Desegregation: District Desegregation Team, minutes, North Little Rock School District

The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.
/ Attachment I - Nll NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT North Little Rock, Arkansas Minutes of the District Desegregation Team Meeting on March 11, 1991. The North Little Rock School District Desegregation Team met on Monday, March 11, 1991, at 1:30 p.m., in the Board Room of the Administration Building. The following team members attended the meeting: Mr. James Smith, Mrs. Mable Bynum, Mr. Gene Jones, Mr. Bobby Acklin, Mr. Donald Watkins, Mr. Jim Morris, Mr. Greg Daniels, Mrs. Mable Mitchell, and Ms. Scharmel Bolling. Mrs. Bynum opened the meeting and furnished copies of the agenda. (See copy attached.) The first matter discussed was the comparison of disciplinary referrals for first semester 1989/90 and 1990/91. The total number of disciplinary referrals reflected an increase of 4.4% and disciplinary actions reflected a 17% overall increase in suspensions. Current year expulsions reflected a 44% decrease. Fewer expulsions and the establishment of an elementary suspension program at the Boys Club were cited as factors contributing to increased suspensions. Mr. Smith noted that far fewer referrals related to misbehavior on buses even though approximately twenty buses had been added by the Transportation Department. Mr. Smith questioned what percentage of the total referrals reflected individual students with several referrals. Mr. Daniels explained that the Computer Services Department could generate information to address this concern in an easy-to-read format. Mrs. Bynum requested that such a format be used for all monthly reports in the future. Mrs. Bynum expressed concern about the accuracy of coding disciplinary referrals. She requested Mr. Acklin to address this concern with Principals at the next Administrator's meeting. Ms. Bolling expressed concern with the number of students ref~rred for possession of dangerous objects. She requested clarification of the District's Policy, noting a difference between the number of students referred for this infraction and the number actually expelled. Mr. Acklin explained that each incident is examined on an individual basis as he personally reviews every reported incident of possession of a dangerous object. Depending on the circumstances, some of the students are suspended rather than expelled. Mrs. Mitchell expressed appreciation for the use of discretion in recommending expulsions. Mr. Acklin also mentioned that all expelled students are referred to the Juvenile Courts School in order for student to continue earning academic credits. Unfortunately, some students elect not to attend. These students are not given the option of attending the Alternative School. .. It was noted that the West Campus has not recommended any students for expulsion. Mrs. Mitchell inquired as to why there have been more expulsions on the East Campus. Mr. Smith noted that the age of the students more than the size of enrollment was a major factor in the number of expulsions. Mrs. Bynum mentioned that often situations arising in the community result in campus misbehavior. Mr. Jones requested statistics from the West Campus regarding the incidences of older students electing to withdraw from school to avoid expulsion. Mr. Smith noted that next year all students must remain in school until age eighteen or graduation, therefore, an Alternative School Program will be significant in the District. Mr. Morris mentioned that District administrators had anticipated some increase in disciplinary problems due to the secondary school reorganization, which necessitated changes in assignments for many students and staff members. Mrs. Bynum added that we had been concerned about the large number of suspensions on the seventh grade campus last year, however, the number of current year suspensions for seventh and eighth grade students show a marked decline. We will continue to monitor disciplinary referrals for these groups of students, also. Mrs. Mitchell expressed appreciation for the East Campus staff, and confidence that they were working to ensure a safe educational environment for all students. She was concerned, however, about counselors needing more time to work directly with students experiencing difficulties. Mr. Jones questioned the need for a disciplinary referral category for the Bi-District Alternative School. Mr. Acklin advised the group of the school not being a suspension program, instead one designed for students with unique needs such as inability to cope with school, poor school attendance, or habitual tardiness. Ile stressed the importance of making this factor known in order to benefit students enrolled in this program. The next matter discussed was how to best provide information that monitors need to compare academic achievement of black students with that of white students. The lack of this information was cited by most first semester school teams. A procedure is needed to encompass disaggregated achievement test data, grades and graduation information. Mr. Jones will assemble a committee to address this concern and provide this team a report on findings and plans next month. Several members discussed the need to follow-up on the performance of students removed from basic classes. The team also discussed reviewing the performance of students assigned to teachers who have completed specific inservice programs such as TESA and Cooperative Learning. Elementary grade distribution sheets must be prepared by hand due to the absence of on-site computer terminals. This process requires more time. There is a need for standardization in relation to the secondary schools. Mr. Daniels stated tl1at he was eager to bring elementary schools into the computer network. Mrs. Bynum acknowledged the District's financial situation, but stressed the fact that data collection is such a critical part of monitoring, therefore, constant accumulation of data will prove to be very cumbersom without adequate computer terminals. We next reviewed and discussed first semester School Monitoring Reports. Mr. Morris expressed the need for principals to correctly code building expenditures in order to document purchases of materials and supplies for each department. Other areas of concern discussed were those related to student discipline, one-race classes, parental involvement, and seating patterns for students, with the team making note to stress the importance of school personnel encouraging interaction between various ethnic groups. The team stressed the importance of Principals sharing the Monitoring Reports with their staffs so they can see the critical concerns, as well as how other schools are handling certain matters as reflected in the numerous positive comments offered by the teams. Mrs. Bynum shared reports prepared by Principals as responses to monitoring teams concerns. The final matter discussed was the Success Through Outstanding Role Models Program (S.T.O.R.M.). There are approximately fifteen North Little Rock High School-West Campus students who completed training February 25, and returned required paperwork. The three pilot elementary schools, Argenta, Pine and Redwood, have identified approximately twenty students for participation. An equal number of participants will be chosen from each school. Mentors will work with the mentees during school time, after school, and much telephone contact will be involved. Each child's needs will be unique and each mentor will convey to his mentee a message of being on his side. Plans call for mentors and mentees to have been paired prior to the March 17 meeting of the Di-racial Committee. There has been long term interest from this committee for the development of such a program and some members have indicated an interest in meeting some of the mentors. Mrs. Bynum mentioned a plan to add tenth grade students prior to the end of the school year. These students could become replacement mentors for graduating participants. Ms. Dolling noted that Classmates for each school might be interested in helping with the STORM program by providing things for them to do or incentives for accomplishments of goals. Mrs. Mitchel expressed pleasure with the initiation of the program and advised the team that she would like to see a program started for female students at some future time. The meeting adjourned at 3:30 p.m. N (0)J E'F IBII LIITTILJE JE(Q)CIBC:J PTIJiffiIIILC C CCIH (ID )( D)I L ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 2700 POPLAR STREET RECEIVED NOV 9 1992 July 29, 1992 Office of Deseg
egtliN1 Monitoriilg Minutes of Administrators' Meeting on July 29, 1992 The Central Office Administrators and Principals of the North Little Rock School Dis~rict met with Steve Jones, District Attorney, on July 29, 1992, at 9:00 a.m., in the Board Room of the Administration Building. The following perscnnel attended: Mr. James Smith, Mrs. Mable Bynum, Mr. Gene Jones, Mr. Bobby Acklin, Mr. Donald Watkins, Ms. Esther Crawford, Mr. Dana Chadwick, Dr. Steve Phaup, Mr. Jim Morris, Mrs. Jo Stt!wart, Mr. Eugene Wise, Mr. Gary Goss, Dr. Jess Walker, Mrs. Letitia Martin, Mr. Doyne Ward, Mrs. Barbara Gilkey, Mrs. Ann Kincl, Mr. Gregg Thompson, Mr. Ken Kirspel, Mrs. Ginny Wiseman, Mr. Arthur Tucker, Mrs. Kathy Ccok, Mrs. Jane Ford, Mrs. Susie Jackson, Mrs. Pat Siegel, Mrs. Kaye Lowe, Mrs. Linda Wilson, Mr. Harold Allen, Mrs. Portia Power, Mrs. Beverly Kelso, Mr. James Zeigler, Mrs. Fran Jackson, Miss Dana Snowden, Mrs. Diane Crites, Ms. Linda Chancellor, Ms. Katherine Tweedle, Mrs. Marsha Paul and Mr. Johnny Kellar. The objective of the meeting was to increase staff's awareness of the Desegregation Plans (North Little Rock School District and Interdistrict) as approved April 29, 1992. Mr. Smith opened th~ meeting by explaining that Attorney Steve Jones would go through the plans with them so they would be familiar enough to follow through with implementation and be capable of making their building staffs aware of the District's responsibilities in meeting these mandated orders. Mrs. Bynum furnished copies to each person and informed the group that a copy of the plans would be placed in the media centers of each school. Mr. Smith went on to say that Judge Wright always remind& us that "this is r.ot my plan, it is yours," so we all have to be well informed of its content and meet our responsibilities in seeing that every phase of the plan is carried out. Attorney Jones gave a brief explanation cf how our plan evolved and its development. He explained that our plan AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER p: 0. BOX 687, NORTH LITILE ROCK, AR 72115/0687 501/771-8000 evolved around the original "Storm Plan" developed in 1973. He said that he did not feel that the North Little Rock School District contributed to the segregation problems of the Little Rock School District, but the Eighth Circuit Court had the last word and we have to live with it. The NLR Plan was initiated by the filing on March 17, 1986 of the "Plan for Implementing the Remedial Order of the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit as It Applies to the North Little Rock School Dist:rict." The purpose of this initial submission was to address the interdistrict violations add:tessed by the Court of Appeals in LRSD v. PCSSD. The district court required the NLRSD to provide a plan to address its intradistrict violations as well, and in response the NLRSD filed on October 14, 1986, its "Supplement to Plan for Implementing the Remedial Order of the Court of Appeal~ for the Eighth Circuit as It Applies to the North Little Rock School District." Scme modification occurred either by petition to and approval by the district court or by operation of the settlement among the parties which has now been approved. Attorney Jones explained that our District was the only one of the three districts that had a plan approved in 1987. He stressed that our plan draft gave us enough flexibility that would allow us some leadway in implementation, where the other two districts bogged down in not leaving themselves flexibility to change without going back to the court for approval. He commented that our District was accomplishing more with the sn1all amount of desegregation money awarded in the settlement than the other two districts. lie said that all of our money is going into compensa~ory education (slightly more than $500,000. each year). He went on to say that the over-riding element was that we are doing what we said we would do and much more than our pian requires. He said that we could be very proud of our District's sovereignty. He said the court commends us. He also commended us in the smooth implementation of our restructuring process and the fact that implementation of our Reduction in Force policy for the 1992-93 school year had left all the compensatory programs intact. He said that our efforts to involve the community, patrons, students and employees in making decisions for both of these changes was a credit to our District. Attorney Jones complimented Mr. Gene Jones for being instrumental in securing funding to implement additionul programs that our desegregation money would never have covered. He reminded the group that both Master McCutheon and Mr. Reville both said that desegregation is a state of mind. Mr. Smith reminded the group that the District was receiving $500,000. per year for seven years to fund the implementation of the mandated orders. He went on to say that we must keep in mind that we are now in the fourth year of this funding. The first item of the plan discussed by the group was Section 1: Student Assignment Plan. Attorney Jones gave a short explanation of M-to-M transfers and student transfers to magnet schools. He explained the concept used for elementary student assignment where schools in a predominately black area are paired with one or more schools in a predominately non-black area. Each elementary school in the district must have a student population which approximates as nearly as is feasible a racial balance of 42 ptrcent black and 58 percent non-black students. To assure each school will have a student population composed of these percentages, schools are placed in groups so that students within each group can be assigned to schools in such numbers as is necessary to achieve the desired racial composition. Kindergarten students are assigned to their neighborhood schools and are not transported for purposes of racial balance. The next item discussed was our special education program. ~ir. Smith said that we need to look closely at new students entering. Be said that we have a very good evaluation system in identifying special education students, but we do have over representation of blacks in special education. Mrs. Fran Jackson questioned if we over identify special education students, what impact this would have on M-to-M transfers? Attorney Jones could not give an immediate answer to this. He said the District did not guarantee a racial balance in special education. He said that our compensatory programs were in place to help us in this area and we have already seen some good results from the programs. Mr. Smith commented that we are closely monitored by the State Department of Education in special education. They come each year to closely scrutinize our program. Mr. Thompson questioned transfer of a student "in geed standing" from one district to another. It was brought out that a student caught with a gun in a Little Rock school could be transferred to the North Little Rock School District. Mr. Watkins asked if Attorney Jones could see us reaching a deadline of M-to-M transfers. Attorney Jones responded that he did not. Mr. Thompson asked for a brief description of the "School Choice Act." Attorney Jones responded that the Act 762 did have its limitations in that a student residing in one school district can transfer to another school district, the Board of Directors of the resident district may enter into an agreement with the Board of Directors of the receiving school district trar1sferring the student to the receiving district for purposes of education. Boards of Directors of local school districts are prohibited from granting legal transfers in the following situations: (a) where either the resident or the receiving district is under a desegregation relatea court order or has ever been under such a court order
and (b) the transier in question would negatively affect the racial balance of that district which is or has been under such a court order. Attorney Jones discussed Act 624 of 1987 which states that "the children or wards of anyone who is a public school teacher in one school district and a resident of another school district shall be entitled to attend school in either district " Mr. Goss brought up a short discussion of transportation of students for extra curricular activities. Attorney Jones pointed out that our District had provided transportation for extra curricular activities even though the plan did not mandate that we do so. The state finances the cost for transportation of M-to-M transfer students. Attorney Jones said the District is to be commended for an equitable process in achieving a racial balance in our schools. At this time a ten minute break was called. The next item discussed after return from break was Section 2: Staff Recruitment Plan. Attorney Jones commented that this was the most difficult part of the plan. He went on to say that the North Little Rock School District had made great strides in correcting the racial imbalance of Central Office Administrators, Principals and coaches, but has had a problem in recruiting black teachers. He went on to explain that there has been a tremendous drop in black teacher applicants since 1970. He said that many blacks have opted to go into other areas of employment that would offer greater financial security than is offered in the teaching area. He also stressed that our District faced vicious competition just in the i~.rnediate area, since the other two districts in our area are able to offer a higher salary. He commented that we have had a good record of retaining the black teachers we have been able to hire. He said the pool of qualified black applicants continues to shrink, and we do compare favorably with the shrinking pool of applicants. He pointed out that when attending recruitment fairs, we will offer a commitment on the spot to a good black teaching applicant. Mr. Morris brought up a discussion of transferring staff to achieve racial balance. Attorney Jones responded that we certainly could involuntariiy transfer non-black teachers to other schools whose staff is racially imbalanced. Attorney Jones suggested skipping over Secticn 3: Special Education Plan, since it was largely dictated by the State Department of Education. He reminded the group that emphasis should be placed on the evaluation process to identify special education students and constant scrutiny of the process. A short discussion of Section 8: Gifted and Talented Education was the next item. Attorney Jones commented that the same consideration applies to Gifted & Talented Education, in that it is dictated by the State Department of Education. He pointed out that we do have better participation of minorities than the ether two districts. Ann Kincl spoke to th6 problem of getting more black students and black teachers in ~he G/T program. She also said that she would like to see our principals more involved in the program. The next item discussed was Section 4: Compensatory Education. Attorney Jones explained that many new programs had alread~ been implemented and others are in the making. He said that many of our teachers had complained about requirements in having to participate in the training program, "Teacher ExpE,ctations and Student Achievement" ('l'ESA). This training consists of five workshop sessions and iive classroom observations per teacher. In the program, teachers learn to inciease specific motivating and supportive interactions with low achievers. He also said that teachers had complained about the project, "Prac~ical Approach to Curriculum and Instructional Renewal" (PACIR). In this program, objectives are developed
students' progress is measured
students' needs identified
and programs, practices and resources adjusted. Attorney Jones said that the North Little Rock School District will continue to focus on remediation of identified deficiencies in reading, language arts and mathematics. He commtanted that "it was just to bad if teachers did not like it - it is a part of our desegregation plan and we do not have ar. option." He went on to say that we could not deviate from the plan. Mr. Smith referred the group to page 36. Mr. Gene Jones explained that the District had hired compensatory a.:.aes and extended day personnel to concentrate efforts toward remedial ~eading and remedial mathematics supplementaty instruction for elementary stuoents in grades 1, 2 and 3. He said we have gone beyond this by employing Remedial Reading teachers. He went on to say other options were being looked at for grades 4, 5 and 6. Ms. Crawford spoke up to say that emphasis in elementary is on grades 1, 2 and 3, and other programs developed for 4, 5 and 6 are our own option. In looking at Section 5: Compensatory Programs Aimed at Dropout Prevention, Attorney Jones pointed out that we have moved far beyond what we have committed to. He used as example our Alternative Education Center - an alternative program for cut-of-school suspensions. The commitment was to provide for selected secondary school students, but has already been expanded to include elementary students. The center will provide services to grades K-12 during the 1992-93 school year. The program is available for students whose behavior is unmanageable both at school and at home and who cannot function in the on-campus suspension program. Students continue their academic work and receive counseling services. The next item discussed was Section 6: Extracurricular Activities. Attorney Jones explained that the Joshua Intervenors had filed & suit against the District challenging the process in selection of spirit groups. He said that we had followed our plan and could not see that in any way the process was unfair. He went on to say that the extra curricular activities were constantly scrutinized and we encourage participation. The district pays for uniforms and transportation because we recognized these were problems that kept some students from participation. Mrs. Bynum reminded the principals at elementary level to closely monitor the awards, committees, etc. to be sure they were racially equitable. Mr. Goss brought up a discussion of the athletic selection process, in that the coaches decide who participates. Attorney Jones said that we certainly have a higher black representative in sporting activities, but it is not a legal matter at this time. Mr. Morris pointed out that coaches have to be certified, but spirit group sponsors do not, although all the district sponsors are certified personnel. Mrs. Wisen,an questioned if the suit was against people or process. Attorney Jones was adamant that the district used a process instead of setting quote
"pick a certain number." Mr. Thompson said we should have a written plan to address each extra curricular activity, the same as we do for curriculum. Attorney Jones suggested that principals keep recvrds of all activities and keep aware of what is going on, when prcblems arise, make plans to correct them. Mrs. Bynum said that principals should look at their School Profiles from the monitori~g process. She suggested they call their staffs' attention to the extra curricular activities, and ask for their input and assistance in monitoring these activities. She also said they might want to look back at the Joshua monitoring reports for their schools. Attorney Jones said that if a problem was seen, we should immediately look for ways to eliminate any disproportionate process in selection of committees, etc. Mrs. Bynum said the key factor was communication to students and parents . The next item discussed was Section 7: Discipline, Expulsions and Suspensions. Attorney Jones said there were three factors to consider for any infraction: (1) communication, (2) consistency, and (3) documentation. He said that documentation will vary commensurate with infraction. He went on to say that we were the first of the three districts to ke~p students in school --- expulsion only for possession of weapon. He said we did not think it was good to put students out on the street, we want to make sure that discipline referrals are in school. A very brief discussion of Section 10: Desegregation Monitoring followed. Attorney Jones commented that he was sure that everyone was familiar with the school based monitoring process, and we were more concerned with the Joshua monitoring. Mrs. Wilson said the Joshua monitoring team was very thorough --- even looking at teachers' lesson plans. Attorney Jones commented that we have to understand their role and be courteous and cooperativew Attorney Jones called attention to pages 1 and 2 of the Interdistrict Desegregation Flan. He informed the group that he had written the introduction and that our role was very limited in the Interdistrict Plan. Mrs. Bynum said she hoped that the overview gave the group a better understanding ot our Desegregation Plan and would enable them to answer questions, and to keep their building staff informed. Meeting was adjourned at 1~:00 p.m. ~ ov 9 1?9 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 0:1 .a of 1:er.c~')':-'i:,, I 'J,.::
1g North Little Rock, Arkansas Minutes of District Desegregation Team Meeting on September 14, 1992 The North Little Rock District Desegregation team met on September 14, 1992, at 1:30 p.m., in the Board Room of the Administration Building, with the District Attorney, Members from the Federal Courts Office of Desegregation Monitoring and Members of the Joshua Intervenors Monitoring team. Persons attending the meeting were: Ann Brown, Federal Monitor - ODM Horace Smith - Associate Monitor - ODM Ms. Joy Springer - Joshua Intervenors Mrs. Lorene Joshua - Joshua Intervenors Mrs. Delois Sikes - Joshua Intervenors Ms. Debbie Parker - Joshua Intervenors Mr. Kirke Herman - Joshua Intervenors Steve Jones, Attorney - NLRSD Mr. James Smith - Superintendent of Schools - NLRSD Mrs. Mable Bynum - Asst. Supt.-Desegregation - NLRSD Mr. Gene Jones - Asst. Supt.-Instruction - NLRSD Mr. Bobby Acklin - Asst. Supt.-Student Services - NLRSD Mr. Donald Watkins - Asst. Supt.-Business - NLRSD Mr. Jim Morris - Director-Personnel - NLRSD Mr. Greg Daniels - Director-Computer Services - NLRSD. Steve Jones opened the meeting by expressing concern that information required for internal monitoring as well as requests for additional information from the Office of Desegregation Monitoring and the Joshua Monitoring Team could become a tremendous task for our District Desegregation Office. He stressed a need to come up with a schedule of reports and information to be provided to both ODM and Joshua, thus lessening the voluminous paper work involved. He also said that some of the information requested by the Joshua team was impossible to provide prior to their visits due to the early date. He pointed out that we did not allow our internal monitoring teams to interrupt the educational process in the classrooms and that last year some of our teachers had felt intimidated during Joshua's monitoring visits. Ms. Springer responded that they had already agreed that they would go about the process somewhat differently from last year. A discussion then pursued relating to individual data on students. Steve Jones reminded everyone that students records were protected by the Educational Privacy Act
therefore, individual records could only be viewed with written permission from the parents of students. Mr. Gene Jones explained that aggregated test data was compiled and could be furnished to them for perusal. Ms. Springer responded that their team just wanted to be sure that the tests were being given and data kept for each student. Steve Jones replied that the data was available in Principals' offices, and with written permission from parents, individual student data could be made available to them. The next item discussed was the Joshua team's request to view teachers' plan books. Steve Jones requested their rationale for this request? Ms. Springer responded that they wanted to know what was going on in the classroom and to make sure the multicultural curriculum was being included in the classrooms. Steve Jones pointed out that teachers' plan books were as varied as the individual teachers themselves, and a lesson plan would not always reflect a true picture of the learning process of a particular class, or the many facets of a particular lesson. Steve Jones used an example of an instructor he had in college that lectured without notes, but to him represented one of the best instructors he had. Mr. Herman responded that although he had been out of the educational field for some time, that teachers always used an organization plan. Ms. Springer commented that the group looked at teachers' lesson plan books last year and did not understand why this was a problem now. Further discussion continued on this issue. Steve Jones explained that he had thought Joshua monitors were asking to collect all the teachers' plan books for scrutiny. Mr. Morris commented that it would be a problem for one of the team members to look at a plan book and understand it without a teacher to explain the contents. Ms. Springer and Mr. Herman agreed that they would be upset if they did not find a plan book "up to date," asking how a teacher's lessons could be evaluated. Mr. Gene Jones pointed out that principals confer with teachers about plan books to evaluate what is occurring in the classroom. He went on to say that there are two formal observations of each teacher in the classroom every year and this is used by the principal in evaluating the teacher. Mr. Acklin commented that not only are there two formal observations, there are also many informal observations occurring in the schools, in the way of walk through observations of classes by principals, but that it would be impossible to document everything. Mrs. Brown agreed that monitoring during a class session could be made very intimidating to a teacher. Mr. Horace Smith spoke to the issue of multicultural education. He said that it is not necessarily that which is highlighted in a "plan book," but observations and conferences with the principal regarding multicultural infusion into the curriculum and activities occurring in the schools would assure the monitoring groups that multicultural education is being included in the educational procccc cf the schools in our area. Steve Jones again reiterated that the District does not want its teachers to worry about monitoring so much that the educational process will be hindered in any way. A discussion between Steve Jones and Ms. Springer continued. Mr. Jones pointed out that it would be best for monitoring teams to talk with teachers during breaks and preparation periods. He stressed that the monitoring process should not be observed as a process to place the blame on any one, but should be as constructive as possible for the teachers and principals. Ms. Springer responded that their team would like to spend more time in the classroom this year. The next item discussed was the possibility of the District Desegregation Office forwarding the same or similar information to the Court, the Office of Desegregation Monitoring and the Joshua Intervenors, instead of having to gather different information for each. Steve Jones pointed out that at least a fifty percent change occurs during any one school year and gathering the data in the many ways requested by the different groups was becoming such a tremendous task that it was hard to carry on the regular business required of the Desegregation Office. He also commented that a clear cut assignment of students was not completed for at least two weeks after the opening of school and then it was constantly changing. A discussion between Ms. Springer and Mrs. Bynum concerning the School Profiles was the next item. Mrs. Bynum responded that October 1 enrollment and assignments were usually the basis for the profiles, so the profiles would not be ready until sometime in October. Mrs. Brown reported that her office had been studying materials used by schools in Cleveland, Ohio, and they would decide if some of the methods and forms used there could be useful in this area. She said they would furnish all three districts a survey form to be used to audit all reports and information generated. The Office of Desegregation Monitoring could then make its requests for information match the district's schedule. Format and appropriate dates for reports were discussed. Once these are agreed upon, the Compute~ Services Departments in all three districts could generate information for transmittal to the Office of Desegregation Monitoring and Joshua Intervenors. Mrs. Brown commented that there was great redundancy in information, including the school monitoring process. She indicated a need to coordinate team visits and collaboration of our efforts to avoid such redundancy. Ms. Springer brought up a discussion of the Desegregation Plan relating to the Special Education section. She asked if we had a Special Education Committee. Steve Jones responded that the committee was in place and Dr. Steve Phaup was in charge of thi~ committee. Mrs. Bynum pointed out that she had invited Joshua Intervenors through Attorney John Walker last spring to inform the District of its appointee to the Special Education Review Committee. Mrs. Bynum said that she was not aware if the committee had met yet this year, but Dr. Phaup would know and could answer any concerns they would have about our Special Education Program. The next item discussed was the compensatory education programs that have been implemented by the District. Steve Jones commented that we should not be surprised if these classes are racially disproportionate. Ms. Springer asked whether we knew if the compensatory education programs were working? Mr. Gene Jones said that the program goals are being monitored closely, and thus far had shown a definite improvement
however, some of the programs are too new for much analysis. Ms. Springer questioned criteria for classroom aides. Mr. Gene Jones responded that it depends on the number of Chapter I students and criteria is set to meet the needs. He went on to say that the District increased the number of these positions last year and uses computer lab aides at the elementary and middle school levels. He stressed that needs vary greatly in different elementary schools
however, each elementary school has a half-time compensatory aide in addition to those associated with the Chapter I and computer labs. Ms. Springer questioned the use of social workers in the District. Mr. Jones responded that Barbara Gilkey does work in this capacity and heads up our HIPPY Program. He went on to say we had added a position of Social Case Worker, whose responsibility is to work with pregnant students and students who have young children of their own. Social workers receive referrals for assistance from school personnel. Steve Jones praised the District's efforts in compensatory education programs, stressing the expansion of our HIPPY Program which is now serving at least 200 families. Several aides are working in this program which helps to give home instruction to students who might not otherwise get the pre-school attention they need. Mrs. Joshua voiced a concern about the nature of the bussing plan for some of the students in the Gribble Addition and Boone Park areas. Mr. Acklin explained that all elementary students living more than two miles from their school were provided transportation. A discussion concerning this practice ensued. Mrs. Joshua was concerned that some of these students lived more than two miles from school and were not being transported. Mr. Acklin assured her this was not the case. Mr. Acklin reported that the State does not require student transportation, but if a District chooses to transport students, reimbursement is made for students being transported two miles or more. He also pointed out that we furnish transportation by choice for the benefit of our students, but the District could not afford to transport all students. He reiterated his intention to review the areas of concern with a commitment to fairness in approving any new bus routes. The next item discussed was class size. Mrs. Bynum addressed this concern by reporting that classes are kept within the maximum student limit, but stressing that at both the elementary and secondary levels student counts above 25 are allowed. Mrs. Bynum questioned Mrs. Brown concerning the forms she would furnish to the District. Mrs. Brown responded that a master schedule would be developed that we could all work with. Steve Jones thanked the group for their attendance, and Mrs. Bynum requested that the regular District Desegregation Team members remain for further discussion. Mrs. Bynum questioned Steve Jones about what we should do about the quarterly reports. Steve Jones responded that he thought we should continue to submit the reports, since much of the instructional information submitted in the reports was not available in any other complete report. It was agreed that we would continue to compile information to be submitted for July, August and September. Comparison data of achievement disparity was discussed. Steve Jones said that the achievement disparity in our District had been impacted by some factors beyond our control
however, we continue to do many things to address the issue. We discussed the need to keep follow through data on students who remain in our District for all of their education. We could then compare that data with that collected on students that come and go from the District. Meeting was adjourned at 3:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, f:::w~~ NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT North Little Rock, Arkansas Minutes of District Desegregation Team Meeting on September 14, 1992 The North Little Rock District Desegregation team met on September 14, 1992, at 1:30 p.m., in the Board Room of the Administration Building, with the District Attorney, Members from the Federal Courts Office of Desegregation Monitoring and Members of the Joshua Intervenors Monitoring team. Persons attending the meeting were: Ann Brown, Federal Monitor - ODM Horace Smith - Associate Monitor - ODM Ms. Joy Springer - Joshua Intervenors Mrs. Lorene Joshua - Joshua Intervenors Mrs. Delois Sikes - Joshua Intervenors Ms. Debbie Parker - Joshua Intervenors Mr. Kirke Herman - Joshua Intervenors Steve Jones, Attorney - NLRSD Mr. James Smith - Superintendent of Schools - NLRSD Mrs. Mable Bynum - Asst. Supt.-Desegregation - NLRSD Mr. Gene Jones - Asst. Supt.-Instruction - NLRSD Mr. Bobby Acklin - Asst. Supt.-Student Services - NLRSD Mr. Donald Watkins - Asst. Supt.-Business - NLRSD Mr. Jim Morris - Director-Personnel - NLRSD Mr. Greg Daniels - Director-Computer Services - NLRSD. Steve Jones opened the meeting by expressing concern that information required for internal monitoring as well as requests for additional information from the Office of Desegregation Monitoring and the Joshua Monitoring Team could become a tremendous task for our District Desegregation Office. He stressed a need to come up with a schedule of reports and information to beprovided to both ODM and Joshua, thus lessening the voluminous paper work involved. He also said that some of the information requested by the Joshua team was impossible to provide prior to their visits due to the early date. He pointed out that we did not allow our internal monitoring teams to interrupt the educational process in the classrooms and that last year some of our teachers had felt intimidated during Joshua's monitoring visits. Ms. Springer responded that they had already agreed that they would go about the process somewhat differently from last year. A discussion then pursued relating to individual data on students. Steve Jones reminded everyone that students records were protected by the Educational Privacy Act
therefore, individual records could only be viewed with written permission from the parents of students. Mr. Gene Jones explained that aggregated test data was compiled and could be furnished to them for perusal. Ms. Springer responded that their team just wanted to be sure that the tests were being given and data kept for each student. Steve Jones replied that the data was available in Principals' offices, and with written permission from parents, individual student data could be made available to them. The next item discussed was the Joshua team's request to view teachers' plan books. Steve Jones requested their rationale for this request? Ms. Springer responded that they wanted to know what was going on in the classroom and to make sure the multicultural curriculum was being included in the classrooms. Steve Jones pointed out that teachers' plan books were as varied as the individual teachers themselves, and a lesson pl~n would not always reflect a true picture of the learning process of a particular class, or the many facets of a particular lesson. Steve Jones used an example of an instructor he had in college that lectured without notes, but to him represented one of the best instructors he had. Mr. Herman responded that although he had been out of the educational field for some time, that teachers always used an organization plan. Ms. Springer commented that the group looked at teachers' lesson plan books last year and did not understand why this was a problem now. Further discussion continued on this issue. Steve Jones explained that he had thought Joshua monitors were asking to collect all the teachers' plan books for scrutiny. Mr. Morris commented that it would be a problem for one of the team members to look at a plan book and understand it without a teacher to explain the contents. Ms. Springer and Mr. Herman agreed that they would be upset if they did not find a plan book "up to date," asking how a teacher's lessons could be evaluated. Mr. Gene Jones pointed out that principals confer with teachers about plan books to evaluate what is occurring in the classroom. He went on to say that there are two formal observations of each teacher in the classroom every year and this is used by the principal in evaluating the teacher. Mr. Acklin commented that not only are there two formal observations, there are also many informal observations occurring in the schools, in the way of walk through observations of classes by principals, but that it would be impossible to document everything. Mrs. Brown agreed that monitoring during a class session could be made very intimidating to a teacher. Mr. Horace Smith spoke to the issue of multicultural education. He said that it is not necessarily that which is highlighted in a "plan book," but observations and conferences with the principal regarding multicultural infusion into the curriculum and activities occurring in the schools would assure the monitoring groups that multicultural education is being included in th1: 1::d.ucationa1p:
::-ocess cf the schools in our area. Steve Jones again reiterated that the District does not want its teachers to worry about monitoring so much that the educational process will be hindered in any way. A discussion between Steve Jones and Ms. Springer continued. Mr. Jones pointed out that it would be best for monitoring teams to talk with teachers during breaks and preparation periods. He stressed that the monitoring process should not be observed as a process to place the blame on any one, but should be as constructive as possible for the teachers and principals. Ms. Springer responded that their team would like to spend more time in the classroom this year. The next item discussed was the possibility of the District Desegregation Office forwarding the same or similar information to the Court, the Office of Desegregation Monitoring and the Joshua Intervenors, instead of having to gather different information for each. Steve Jones pointed out that at least a fifty percent change occurs during any one school year and gathering the data in the many ways requested by the different groups was becoming such a tremendous task that it was hard to carry on the regular business required of the Desegregation Office. He also commented that a clear cut assignment of students was not completed for at least two weeks after the opening of school and then it was constantly changing. A discussion between Ms. Springer and Mrs. Bynum concerning the School Profiles was the next item. Mrs. Bynum responded that October 1 enrollment and assignments were usually the basis for the profiles, so the profiles would not be ready until sometime in October. Mrs. Brown reported that her office had been studying materials used by schools in Cleveland, Ohio, and they would decide if some of the methods and forms used there could be useful in this area. She said they would furnish all three districts a survey form to be used to audit all reports and information generated. The Office of Desegregation Monitoring could then make its requests for information match the district's schedule. Format and appropriate dates for reports were discussed. Once these are agreed upon, the Computer Services Departments in all three districts could generate information for transmittal to the Office of Desegregation Monitoring and Joshua Intervenors. Mrs. Brown commented that there was great redundancy in information, including the school monitoring process. She indicated a need to coordinate team visits and collaboration of our efforts to avoid such redundancy. Ms. Springer brought up a discussion of the Desegregation Plan relating to the Special Education section. She asked if we had a Special Education Committee. Steve Jones responded that the committee was in place and Dr. Steve Phaup was in chu~gc of this committee. Mrs. Bynum pointed out that she had invited Joshua Intervenors through Attorney John Walker last spring to inform the District of its appointee to the Special Education Review Committee. Mrs. Bynum said that she was not aware if the committee had met yet this year, but Dr. Phaup would know and could answer any concerns they would have about our Special Education Program. The next item discussed was the compensatory education programs that have been implemented by the District. Steve Jones commented that we should not be surprised if these classes are racially disproportionate. Ms. Springer asked whether we knew if the compensatory education programs were working? Mr. Gene Jones said that the program goals are being monitored closely, and thus far had shown a definite improvement
however, some of the programs are too new for much analysis. Ms. Springer questioned criteria for classroom aides. Mr. Gene Jones responded that it depends on the number of Chapter I students and criteria is set to meet the needs. He went on to say that the District increased the number of these positions last year and uses computer lab aides at the elementary and middle school levels. He stressed that needs vary greatly in different elementary schools
however, each elementary school has a half-time compensatory aide in addition to those associated with the Chapter I and computer labs. Ms. Springer questioned the use of social workers in the District. Mr. Jones responded that Barbara Gilkey does work in this capacity and heads up our HIPPY Program. He went on to say we had added a position of Social Case Worker, whose responsibility is to work with pregnant students and students who have young children of their own. Social workers receive referrals for assistance from school personnel. Steve Jones praised the District's efforts in compensatory education programs, stressing the expansion of our HIPPY Program which is now serving at least 200 families. Several aides are working in this program which helps to give home instruction to students who might not otherwise get the pre-school attention they need. Mrs. Joshua voiced a concern about the nature of the bussing plan for some of the students in the Gribble Addition and Boone Park areas. Mr. Acklin explained that all elementary students living more than two miles from their school were provided transportation. A discussion concerning this practice ensued. Mrs. Joshua was concerned that some of these students lived more than two miles from school and were not being transported. Mr. Acklin assured her this was not the case. Mr. Acklin reported that the State does not require student transportation, but if a District chooses to transport students, reimbursement is made for students being transported two miles or more. He also pointed out that we furnish transportation by choice for the benefit of our students, but the District could not afford to transport all students. He reiterated his intention to review the areas of concern with a commitment to fairness in approving any new bus routes. The next item discussed was class size. Mrs. Bynum addressed this concern by reporting that classes are kept within the maximum student limit, but stressing that at both the elementary and secondary levels student counts above 25 are allowed. Mrs. Bynum questioned Mrs. Brown concerning the forms she would furnish to the District. Mrs. Brown responded that a master schedule would be developed that we could all work with. Steve Jones thanked the group for their attendance, and Mrs. Bynum requested that the regular District Desegregation Team members remain for further discussion. Mrs. Bynum questioned Steve Jones about what we should do about the quarterly reports. Steve Jones responded that he thought we should continue to submit the reports, since much of the instructional information submitted in the reports was not available in any other complete report. It was agreed that we would continue to compile information to be submitted for July, August and September. Comparison data of achievement disparity was discussed. Steve Jones said that the achievement disparity in our District had been impacted by some factors beyond our control
however, we continue to do many things to address the issue. We discussed the need to keep follow through data on students who remain in our District for all of their education. We could then compare that data with that collected on students that come and go from the District. Meeting was adjourned at 3:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ~w~~ rmv 9 t992 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Of/leec ,f0 ~~\1~a:l!ioMro. nitoring North Little Rock, Arkansas Minutes of District Desegregation Team Meeting on October 12, 1992 The North Little Rock District Desegregation team met on October 12, 1992, at 1:30 p.m., in the Board Room of the Administration Building. The following persons attended the meeting: Mrs. Mable Bynum, Mr. James Smith, Mr. Gene Jones, Mr. Donald Watkins, Mr. Jim Morris, Ms. Scharmel Bolling and Mr. Greg Daniels. Mrs. Bynum opened the meeting by reminding the members that she had furnished copies of a memo from the Office of Desegregation Monitoring regarding a survey/information audit. She pointed out that she had furnished a list of forms and information previously required from each particular department and asked that the administrator responsible feel free to add to or revise the list. Ms. Bolling questioned "date available." Mrs. Bynum responded if it was information or report due periodically that an approximate date could be used. Ms. Bolling stated that she usually FAXed a copy of any information from her office to the Federal Monitor's office. Mr. Jones commented that the items listed for instruction were not nearly as comprehensive as his regular quarterly status update. He mentioned that vocational assessments, extended day program and the summer transition program were not shown on his list. Mrs. Bynum agreed that these items should be included since they pertain to our compensatory education program. Mrs. Bynum inquired about the personnel department's responsibilities. Mr. Morris responded that he thought his list was complete. Mr. Daniels questioned the instructional requirement of interim grades/report cards. Mrs. Bynum stated that we could only report the dates that interim grades/report cards were issued. She pointed out that the Joshua team had reported in its findings that we were only doing interim reports for the first quarter. We discussed the practice that Lakewood Middle School has made to furnish parents/guardians a copy of the students' interim grades as part of their MGAP project. Mrs. Bynum reiterated that the list she had prepared was only a start to give each administrator an idea to expand upon, and if they would make her aware of any and all information/reports issued from their offices or other offices under their respective area, she would then pass the information on to the Federal Monitor's Office. She reminded them that this information is due on October 19th. Mr. Jones reported that our annual school report to the State Department of Education is due on October 15, 1992. We discussed the fact that this is reported from Computer Services in the form of a disk which could be furnished to other sources if requested. Mrs. Bynum informed the team of our student enrollment statistics for the 1992-93 school year. She reported that we have 9,251 students enrolled with 48.3 percent black as compared with 46.9 percent during the 1991-92 school year. Mrs. Bynum noted that we have several elementary schools with more than 50 percent black students. Mrs. Bynum reported that the District has 295 black M-to-M transfers from the Little Rock District and we have 143 non-black M-to-M transferring to the Little Rock District. The District also has 545 students enrolled in Magnet Schools (276 non-black and 269 black). It was also pointed out that our District has 57 black students going to Oak Grove and only 7 non-black coming to our District from Oak Grove. It was further noted that under the School Choice Act we had only one black student going to Pulaski County Special School District, while 81 non-black from Pulaski County attend North Little Rock Schools. Mr. Morris asked if we report on home schooling? Mr. Jones responded that the parents notify us of the home schooling and from there it was handled through the State Department of Education. He pointed out that there seemed to be an increase in home schooling each year. Mrs. Bynum asked Mr. Jones if he had any information on the Special Education Committee? Mr. Jones responded that the committee was in place and had met once thus far. He reported that Mr. Prentice Dupins had been appointed to the committee. Mrs. Bynum commented that the Joshua t~am had inquired about the committee and that she had sent a copy of her earlier letter inviting them to appoint a member to serve on the committee, but Joshua had not responded to the invitation at this time. Mr. Morris furnished copies of the staffing percentages by race and gender for 1992-93. He reported that we had made some progress in that we now have a black teacher placed in the Gifted/ Talented program. He pointed out that we did have a glaring need for black teachers at Baring Cross, but that the enrollment was down this year at the school, therefore, no new staff were hired. Ms. Bolling inquired if the courts have set down a specific quota we must meet for staffing. Mr. Morris responded that state legislation says we should have the same percentage black teachers as students. We discussed the relevant labor market as compared to our district's accomplishment in recruiting black teachers and agreed that we were ahead in percentages as compared to the applicants available as represented by the labor market statistics. Mr. Morris commented that the district had offered contracts to four black teachers that had turned us down this year. We discussed our inability to compete in salaries with the other two districts in our area with our budget. Mr. Morris reported that he would start next week visiting colleges/universities in recruitment efforts for the 1993-94 school year. Recruitment packets have been sent to all major colleges in Arkansas and surrounding states in preparation of recruiting. Mr. Watkins reported that in budget comparisons from last year, some pre-school money was added from the desegregation budget for supplies and equipment. He further explained that some of the cost was paid under the Chapter I program. The next discussion concerning "Project Promise" was led by Mr. Jones. He explained that this program is targeted at black students for our Gifted/Talented program. He reported that we have employed three persons to work part-time as home visitors. Mrs. Bynum commented that we also have non-black students with the same needs. Mr. Jones reported that $25,000 had been allocated for band instrument purchase in an effort to recruit students that would not otherwise participate in band because of lack of funds for instruments. Mrs. Bynum inquired about the status of the pre-school program scheduled to open at Redwood Elementary. Mr. Jones responded that materials had been ordered and plans were to get the program in operation during the month of November. Further discussion of the pre-school program continued. Mr. Jones explained that funding for teachers was provided by Chapter I and that the Arkansas Better Chance Program (ABC) provided funding for the paraprofessionals. He said that we also used some desegregation money for supplies and materials. Mr. Jones reported that the program required that a separate fenced play area be provided for these students. Mr. Morris asked if the ABC funds were recurring? Mr. Jones responded that it could be a very competitive process, but he felt sure that it will continue. The next item discussed was staff development. Mrs. Bynum asked if plans were being implemented for secondary TESA training. Mr. Jones said we would prefer the teachers participate in the training after regular work hours and pay them a stipend. He expressed assurance that we will conclude total staff training in areas mandated by the court order by the time required. Mr. Jones asked that we discuss a problem he has seen in the compensatory education program. He reported that he thinks there is an erosion of the extended day program in some of our elementary schools. He said that we needed to decide if we were going to continue this program as a part of our disparity reduction plan and if so, we had to come up with a definite plan or face continued erosive process in the program. He pointed out two problems with the program: (1) transportation and (2) some principals' attitudes. Ms. Bolling asked if we had shown any improvement in students' test scores? Mr. Jones said we had seen about a three point gain on test scores from the participating students. He said that schools in Oklahoma City had used this program and it had proved to be very effective. Mr. Jones reported that three of our elementary schools are now using the compensatory aides to provide services to at risk students in other ways than the extended day program. Mrs. Bynum responded that if they are operating successfully in some schools, we should have them in all schools. She went on to say that she liked the idea and hoped we would be able to impact the test scores, but also we should be able to see some behavior improvement from these students. Mr. Jones agreed to address this issue with elementary principals. The next item discussed was the positive effect we are seeing in the HIPPY program. We discussed the differences in the extended day program and HIPPY program. It was agreed that the personnel involved and the attitudes displayed make the difference in the programs effectiveness. Mr. Jones announced a pre-school parents' meeting at Central Elementary School scheduled for tonight and encouraged the other administrators to attend. Ms. Bolling brought up a discussion of the district's participation in services offered to students eligible for medicaid assistance for a new dental/vision clinic that has offered its services. Ms. Bolling reported that we were getting some resistance from principals in releasing students for the services. The clinic personnel are responsible to furnish a signed statement from the parents for release of the students. Mr. Jones responded that there was some employee concerns about the clinic's operation being questionable, as to whether it is offering medical treatment or merely providing medicaid screenings. He further stated that the district has approximately 600 students that would be eligible for the services. He also pointed out that the district does some screening and we could possibly bill medicaid for those. All agreed that efforts should be made to help students to be physically fit for learning. Mrs. Bynum reminded the team members to submit quarterly desegregation status update information by October 30, 1992. Respectfully submitted, ~Wo~~ ' NLRSD Dese re ation Team Meetin s Year Dates Attendance (13) Proof Number Percent 2002-03 7 54% Minutes 2001-02 11 85% Minutes 9/11/01 Canceled Notice 4/9/02 Notice 3/02 Canceled Note 2/12/02 Notice 1/02 Canceled Note 12/11/01 Canceled Notice 11/28-29/01 ??????? Notice 11/13101 Notice 2000-01 3/12/01 10 77% Minutes 5/8/01 Canceled 10/10/00 Notice 1999-00 3/14/00 11 85% Minutes 2/8/00 8 62% Minutes 1/11/00 Notice 12/14/99 Canceled Notice 11/9/99 11 85% Minutes 10/12/99 11 85% Minutes 1998-99 10 77% Minutes 9 69% Minutes 11/10/98 10 77% Minutes 1997-98 5/12/98 Canceled Notice 14/14/98 12 92% Roster 3/10/98 Canceled Notice 2/10/98 12 92% Minutes 1/13/98 10 77% Roster and 12/9/97 11 85% Roster and 11/11/97 12 92% Roster and 10/14/97 10 77% Roster f9~9l 4=,~, 1995-96 4 31% Minutes 1994-95 r 1993-94 1992-93 12/14/92 8 62% Minutes NLRSD Desegregation Team Meetings Year Dates Attendance (13) Proof I Number Percent 2002-03 3/18/03 t 7 54% Minutes - 2001-02 ~ 10/9/01 11 85% Minutes 9/11/01 Canceled Notice 4/9/02 Notice 13/02 Canceled Note 12/12/02 Notice -- - 1/02 Canceled -- Note 12/11/01 Canceled Notice 11/28-29/01 ??????? Notice - 11/13/01 Canceled 1 Notice - 2000-01 3/12/01 10 77% Minutes 5/8/01 10/10/00 Notice 1999-00 3/14/00 11 85% Minutes - 2/8/00 8 62% Minutes 1/11/00 Notice 12/14/99 Canceled Notice 11/9/99 11 85% Minutes - -, 10/12/99 11 85% Minutes - 1998-99 2/9/99 10 77% Minutes -, - ~ 12/8/98 9 69% Minutes I- - -11/10/98 - 10 77% Minutes 1997-98 5/12/98 Canceled Notice ~ -, - 4/14/98 12 92% Roster >-- - 3/10/98 Canceled Notice -2/10/98 12 92% Minutes 1/13/98 10 77% Roster and agenda - -12/9/97 11 85% Roster and agenda - - - 11/11197 12 92% Roster and agenda ~ -10/14/97 - 10 77% Roster 1996-97 1995-96 7/13/95 4 31% Minutes - 1994-95 -- - I- 1993-94 c--- 1992-93 12/14/92 8 62% Minutes E SEP 1 9 2003 OFFIOCFE DESEGREGMAOTNIOITNO Rl,IG NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 2700 Poplar Street North Little Rock, Arkansas 72114 Minutes of the District Desegregation Team Attachment 1 a The North Little Rock School District Desegregation Team met on Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 1:30 p.m., in the Conference Room of the Administration Building. The following members were present: Bobby Acklin, Greg Daniels, Kaye Lowe, Jerry Massey, )viable Mitchell, Danny Reed, and Donald Watkins. Mr. Acklin started the meeting off with appreciation to the Desegregation Team for attending the first meeting of the school year. With everyone covered up in work and showered with things to do, we have not sat down and talked about what's going on with the different departments. Mr. Acklin reported the Biracial Committee resumed meeting, and he shared his appreciation to the Desegregation Team for attending those meetings as well. It helps us keep informed on what each department is doing. Mr. James Smith and Mr. Dana Chadwick may be 15 minutes late to the meeting due to their presence required at the Monitoring Exit Meeting in the District. Mr. Acklin reported monitoring is in progress, as we do every year. Monitoring is designed to help improve the schools. To the best of his knowledge, no one else has monitored and each year it gets a little less and less. Office of Desegregation Monitoring could have been in the first week of school, but he does not recall. That is not to say we are doing everything right, but he thinks someone recognizes that we are trying to do things right. He mentioned that as we work through desegregation, we will never get it perfect because it is based on individuals
and, individuals are not perfect
we will always make mistakes. Our monitoring is to catch those mistakes
things we might be doing wrong or could do differently
make it better for the students and then we can change it. He hopes that monitoring fits into a part of what the schools are doing rather than something that's viewed with apprehension. The final monitoring reports have been turned in from the schools. These reports will be compiled in booklet form, and you will receive a copy. Mr. Acklin stated he has not had a chance to analyze the discipline to report to the Desegregation Team. Mrs. Jackson is still ill, but she is doing better. He announced Thursday, March 20, 2003, at the School Board Meeting, four students will be recommended for expulsion for drugs
smoking marijuana
second offense. There will be two students from the NLRHS-East Campus and two students from the NLRHS-West Campus. Mr. Acklin informed the Desegregation Team that he has started working on student assignments early this year to assure this task is accomplished, and he will make adjustments as he goes. He is in the process of getting the elementary student assignments completed and sent to Computer Services to be entered in the computer, so that printouts could be sent to the schools to check for accuracy. He stated that we have students coming and going from every direction in the District, in which special attention is given. Page 2 Minutes of the District Desegregation Team Mr. Acklin asked Mr. Massey if the capacity of the schools had changed from last year. Mr. Massey explained that nearly every school would change slightly, if the staffing at that school changed. Nothing significant - opts to be less than twenty-change anywhere in the last year. Mr. Acklin stated we would work with him on the capacity of the schools as we move through the assignments. Mr. Acklin announced the Student Handbook Committee would convene in April. As directed by the School Board, the committee will consist of the same number of teachers and Administrators. In addition, parents and high school students will be part of this committee. The Committee will proceed through the handbook to see if there are any changes needed. The School Board wanted this done by a certain time, and we are starting it early to get it done. Mr. Acklin asked if the members had any questions regarding the before mentioned. There was no response from the committee. Mr. Acklin asked if the members had any information that they wanted to share with the committee. Mr. Reed reported Special Education Monitoring would take place the week of May 15, 2003. Regarding Personnel
Mr. Reed reported recruiting efforts are underway, going to colleges and universities
Thursday recruitment will take place at the Chambers of Commerce. One concern Mr. Reed had was the number of college graduates sliming down this year, which would impact recruitment of minority applicants. He reported a number of recruitment activities planned: Grambling State University, Louisiana Tech, University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff, Arkansas Tech and U of A at Fayetteville. Mrs. Lowe reported interviewing twenty-plus applicants for elementary schools. Mrs. Mitchell requested a copy of the minutes so she could share the information with the other members of the School Board. Mr. Acklin explained that everything we do is connected to Desegregation
somehow, someway
and each and every day, he realizes more and more the truth to that statement. "Doing the right things right", that is what desegregation is. Mr. Acklin advised that the next meeting will be next month at the same time and hopes Mrs. Jackson will be back to report on the discipline. Mr. Acklin thanked the team members for their participation and adjourned the meeting. Respectfully Submitted, .ci,:11~
1 d 2003 - vrf\C0F G O, t 'rti:GATAIOO~N l10ffitl NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRIC1 North Little Rock, Arkansas Minutes of the District Desegregation Team Attachment 1 b 2DOI - Z. The North Little Rock School District Desegregation Team met on Tuesday October 9, 2001, at 1: 30 p.111.i, n the Conference Room of the Administration Building. The following members were present: Bobby Acklin, Dana Chadwick, Esther Crawford, Greg Daniels, Fran Jackson, Letitia Martin, Mable Mitchell, Jim Morris, Danny Reed, James Smith, and Donald Watkins. Mr. Acklin opened the meeting by introducing Letitia Martin. Letitia Martin, Director of Federal Programs. New to the table, she was invited to give the Desegregation Team input anytime. Mr. Acklin repo1t the Desegregation Monitoring Team Training has commenced this morning. Only training new monitors, it was an enthusiastic group from across the district. Mr. Acklin shared information to the new monitors to help them in the monitoring process. Mr. Acklin stated that this is the main monitoring becau e it is a self-monitoring and we are not trying to hide anything from ourselves. We are trying to improve upon the areas we are not doing well in, but that is the purpose of self monitoring to find what we are doing well in and build on that and then where we are not doing well we could identify those areas and move forward. Mr. Acklin encouraged the committee not to cover up problems but to note the problem areas and we will try to correct it. The Desegregation Monitoring Team Training make-up session will be this evening from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. for those who could not make this morning's session. Monitoring perimeter dates have been given to the principals
after October 15 to a day in January. Any day during that time, they could have the monitoring team come in and monitor. The principals are to notify Mr. Acklin of their monitoring date. Mr. Acklin reported on State Monitoring. He received a letter from Desegregation Monitoring and Accountability Office
we are continuing Monitoring, "we are continuing our meetings
that will help the State revamp their monitoring program when they come out to the schools." Mr. Acklin will be asking some of the Desegregation Team members to see if the North Lillie Rock School District stands are the same or make changes. We ask the State for help in discipline and staff development. If the State could help us with closing the disparity between black and non-black, we welcome them to come in. Mr. Acklin stated that sometime we close in on orth Little Rock but the problem is not this small it is like this everywhere
we may not be doing as bad as we think we are in discipline. Mrs. Jackson reported the Times ewspaper has requested a breakdown of discipline by - reason and actions. In addition, the Times wanted to know about the alternative Minutes, Desegregation Team Meeting Page 2 Tuseday, October 9, 2001 programs. Mrs. Jackson talked with the reporter, Matthew Hodges, about the Shorter Now Program for the 16 and 17 year old youngsters
The Adult Program for the 18 year old
Argenta
Argenta After School Program
Pulaski Alternative Learning Academy, Step One Program, Water Shed Program, The on-handicap BIA Classroom, and the Incentive Programs in the schools. It has been a concentrated effort to look at the needs of the children and place them in the appropriate placement as we do this then we have a decrease in suspensions. Mrs. Jackson stated that North Little Rock had fewer suspensions this year than the previous year. North Little Rock Administrators in the schools are doing a terrific job. North Little Rock is blessed because we have many alternative programs and we can fit the need of the child with the program. Overall, the data on discipline is showing an improvement. Mr. Acklin informed the members he had received a Jetter from Mr. John Walker's office asking for statistic information on black males as principals and assistant principals. We did provide that information to his office. We have not heard anything back from them. They requested this information after we hired the principal at Poplar Street Middle School. Mrs. Mitchell added she had received calls regarding this situation as well. She referred the callers to the North Little Rock School District's Personnel Office. Mr. Morris stated he had no one to contact him about this situation. Mr. Acklin believes someone who interviewed for the principal position at Poplar Street Middle School felt he/she should have been hired for the position. There were people who applied who had a higher academic degree but no experience. Mr. Acklin remarked that Mrs. Cooley, from John Walker's Office, requested all of the North Little Rock School District committees that a parent could serve. We listed the about 16 committees that parents could serve on and sent the list to Mrs. Cooley. Mr. Acklin reported that he had a visit from Horace Smith from the Office of Desegregation Monitoring regarding the cost of Spirit Group uniforms. He wants to speak with the secondary principals. Mr. Acklin stated we do not have enough in the Desegregation Office budget to help but we do. There was a discussion around the table regarding budgeting Spirit Group uniforms. Some children cannot do fund raising because they do not have an outlet. (Locations and non-working parents). Mr. Acklin mentioned a concern came to his attention regarding a Social Studies Committee that was one-race. Investigating this concern, we found no committee with just one race. Mr. Acklin asked the members to inform him immediately if the members hear of any one-race committees. We are committed to bi-racial committees. .. Minutes, Desegregation Team Meeting Page 3 Tuseday, October 9, 2001 Mr. Acklin brought to the table a personnel issue that may turn into a lawsuit. A teacher felt they were being treated differently than another teacher, based on their degrees
a degree outside of the educational area. This teacher feels like the other teacher is being paid for their degree and he/she is not. We have thoroughly investigating this and cannot find any records where someone is being paid for a doctrine outside of the educational field and someone is not being paid for a doctrine outside of the educational field. We try to do things fair and we are within policy. We have sent the disgruntled teacher a letter explaining this. Mr. Daniels asked for clarification. There was a discussion with Mr. Chadwick, Mr. Acklin, Mr. Morris and Mrs. MitcheJl with explanation and clarification. Mr. Acklin asked the members if they had anything to share. Mr. Daniels mentioned the school profile information would be provided next week. Mr. Reed informed the members that we have not set the Special Education State Monitoring date. We will have a Special Education advisory meeting in November. Mr. Acklin thanked those in attendance and adjourned the meeting. Respectfully Submitted, ,----/..1.. . ,, . ~I \ ./ /2--nd~_ f1/l-C//2( ,.{
, Sandy Juckett, Secretary Sandy Juckett 10/09/01 09:03 AM To: Shara Brazear/NLRSD@NLRSD, Dana Chadwick/NLRSD@NLRSD, Esther Crawford/NLRSD@NLRSD, Greg Daniels/NLRSD@NLRSD, Francical J Jackson/NLRSD@NLRSD, Jerry Massey/NLRSD@NLRSD, Jim Morris/NLRSD@NLRSD, Danny Reed/NLRSD@NLRSD, James Smith/NLRSD@NLRSD, Donald Watkins/NLRSD@NLRSD, Letitia Martin/NLRSD@NLRSD cc: Bobby Acklin/NLRSD@NLRSD Subject: Desegregation Meeting Desegregation meeting today at 1:30 p.m. in the conference room. .N. ., 0 0 U) 0 ' 00 -z 0 ., ... ::r r :::0 0 r,,. .. ..., N I.Jt 0 ' 00 ...... Vl 0 0 0 0 September 28, 2001 Memo To: From: Subject: Shara Brazear, Communication Specialist Dana Chadwick, Administrative Director of Secondary Education Esther Crawford, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Greg Daniels, Director of Computer Services Letitia Martin, Director of Federal Programs Francical Jackson, Director of Student Affairs Jerry Massey, Director of Plant Services Mable Mitchell, School Board Member Jim Morris, Assistant Superintendent for Personnel Danny Reed, Director of Special Services James Smith, Superintendent of Schools Donald Watkins, Assistant Superintendent for Business Affairs Bobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation Desegregation Team Meeting Just a reminder ... Desegregation Team Meeting, Tuesday, October, at 1:30 p.m. in the conference room of the Administration Office. Please note the next seven meeting,
0n vour calendar. November 13, December 11, January 8, February 12, March 12, April 9, May 14, 1 "-----
., ~mnlnvPr. www.nlrsd.kl2,ar.us Sandy Juckett 09/28/01 12:59 PM Sandy Juckett North Little Rock School District To: Shara Brazear/NLRSD@NLRSD, Dana Chadwick/NLRSD@NLRSD, Esther Crawford/NLRSD@NLRSD, Greg Daniels/NLRSD@NLRSD, Francical J Jackson/NLRSO@NLRSD, Jerry Massey/NLRSD@NLRSD, Jim Morris/NLRSD@NLRSD, Danny Reed/NLRSD@NLRSD, James Smith/NLRSD@NLRSD, Donald Watkins/NLRSD@NLRSD, Letitia Martin/NLRSD@NLRSD cc: Bobby Acklin/NLRSD@NLRSD Subject: Desegregation Meeting Secretary to the Assistant Superintendent of Desegregation Mr. Acklin would like to remind all of you about the upcoming desegregation meeting on October 9, 2001 at 1:30 p.m. in the conference room. Please note the next seven meetings on your calenciclr. November 13, December 11, January 8, February 12, March 12, April 9, May 14, Sandy Juckett 09/11/01 10:20 AM Sandy Juckett North Little Rock School District Secretary To: Shara Brazear/NLRSD@NLRSD, Dana Chadwick/NLRSD@NLRSD, Esther Crawford/NLRSD@NLRSD, Greg Daniels/NLRSD@NLRSD, Francical J Jackson/NLRSD@NLRSD, Jerry Massey/NLRSD@NLRSD, Jim Morris/NLRSD@NLRSD, Danny Reed/NLRSD@NLRSD, James Smith/NLRSD@NLRSD, Donald Watkins/NLRSD@NLRSD, Letitia Martin/NLRSD@NLRSD cc: Bobby Acklin/NLRSD@NLRSD Subject: Desegregation meeting scheduled for today has been canceled. Sandy Juckett 09/07 /01 02:47 PM To: Shara Brazear/NLRSD@NLRSD, Dana Chadwick/NLRSD@NLRSD, Esther Crawford/NLRSD@NLRSD, Greg Daniels/NLRSD@NLRSD, Francical J Jackson/NLRSD@NLRSD, Jerry Massey/NLRSD@NLRSD, Jim Morris/NLRSD@NLRSD, Danny Reed/NLRSD@NLRSD, James Smith/NLRSD@NLRSD, Donald Watkins/NLRSD@NLRSD, Letitia Martin/NLRSD@NLRSD cc: Bobby Acklin/NLRSD@NLRSD Subject: Desegregation Meeting Mr. Acklin would like to remind all of you about the upcoming desegregation meeting on September 11, 2001 at 1 :30 p.m. in the conference room. Please note the next eight meetings on your calendar. October 9, November 13, December 11, January 8, February 12, March 12, April 9, May 14, I I - 04/08/02 05:27 PM Sandy Juckett To: Bobby Acklin/NLRSD@NLRSD, Dana Chadwick/NLRSD@NLRSD, Danny Reed/NLRSD@NLRSD, Darlene Holmes/NLRSD@NLRSD, Donald Watkins/NLRSD@NLRSD, Esther Crawford/NLRSD@NLRSD, Francical J Jackson/NLRSD@NLRSD, Greg Daniels/NLRSD@NLRSD, James Smith/NLRSD@NLRSD, Jerry Massey/NLRSD@NLRSD, mablejbm@sbcglobal.net, Jim Morris/NLRSD@NLRSD, Letitia Martin/NLRSD@NLRSD cc: Subject: Meeting Just a reminder .... Deseg. mtg. Tue. April 9 1:30 p.m. cont. rm. Sandy Juckett, Secretary North Little Rock School District 2700 Poplar Street, P.O. Box 687 North Little Rock, AR 72115-0687 501 771-8050 Fax: 501 771-8001 March 2002 meeting cancelled Esther Crawford 02/06/02 01:59 PM To: Sandy Juckett/NLRSD@NLRSD cc: Subject: Re: Desegregation Meeting Tuesday, February 12, 2002 Sandy, I will be out of town on Tuesday and will not be able to attend the meeting. Sorry.Esther Sandy Juckett Sandy Juckett 02/06/02 12:29 PM Please respond to Sandy Juckett To: Bobby Acklin/NLRSD@NLRSD, Dana Chadwick/NLRSD@NLRSD, Danny Reed/NLRSD@NLRSD, Darlene Holmes/NLRSD@NLRSD, Donald Watkins/NLRSD@NLRSD, Esther Crawford/NLRSD@NLRSD, Francical J Jackson/NLRSD@NLRSD, Greg Daniels/NLRSD@NLRSD, James Smith/NLRSD@NLRSD, Jerry Massey/NLRSD@NLRSD, mablejbm@sbcglobal.net, Jim Morris/NLRSD@NLRSD, Letitia Martin/NLRSD@NLRSD cc: Subject: Desegregation Meeting Tuesday, February 12, 2002 There will be a meeting of all members of the desegregation team on Tuesday, February 12, 2002 at 1:30 p.m. in the conference room. N "" 0 0 "0 en "d 0 0::, 0 >< z 0.. ..,. ::r ...., N ,... ..... \J\ 0 ' 00 ...., VI 0 ...., ~ 00 0 0 0 Februruy 6, 2002 Memo To: Shara Brazear, Communication Specialist Dana Chadwick, Administrative Director of Secondary Education Esther Crawford, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Greg Daniels, Director of Computer Services Letitia Martin, Director of Federal Programs Francical Jackson, Director of Student Affairs Jerry Massey, Director of Plant Services Mable Mitchell, School Board Member Jim Morris, Assistant Superintendent for Personnel Danny Reed, Director of Special Services James Smith, Superintendent of Schools Donald Watkins, Assistant Superintendent for Business Affairs From: f1f'- Bobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation Subject: Desegregation Meeting Just a reminder .. . Desegregation Team will meet on Tuesday, February 12, 2002 at 1:30 p.m. in the conference room of the Administration Office A- ,:
,,,.,1 n,,nnrtunitv Emolover www.nlrsd.k12.ar.us January 2002 meeting cancelled Sandy Juckett 12/11/01 11:30 AM To: Bobby Acklin/NLRSD@NLRSD, Dana Chadwick/NLRSD@NLRSD, Danny Reed/NLRSD@NLRSD, Darlene Holmes/NLRSD@NLRSD, Donald Watkins/NLRSD@NLRSD, Esther Crawford/NLRSD@NLRSD, Francical J Jackson/NLRSD@NLRSD, Greg Daniels/NLRSD@NLRSD, James Smith/NLRSD@NLRSD, Jerry Massey/NLRSD@NLRSD, mablejbm@sbcglobal.net, Jim Morris/NLRSD@NLRSD, Letitia Martin/NLRSD@NLRSD cc: Subject: Today's Meeting has been canceled. No Deseg Meeting today. Thank you! N -.J 0 0 "O 0 "O (fl 0 t:d 0 X ' 00 -.J '.0., . . :,- 0 -.J N .... .... "' 0 ' 00 -.J "' 0 -.J -.J ' 0 0 November 20, 2001 Memo To: Shara Brazear, Communication Specialist Dana Chadwick, Administrative Director of Secondary Education Esther Crawford, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Greg Daniels, Director of Computer Services Letitia Martin, Director of Federal Programs Francical Jackson, Director of Student Affairs Jerry Massey, Director of Plant Services Jim Morris, Assistant Superintendent for Personnel Danny Reed, Director of Special Services James Smith, Superintendent of Schools Donald Watkins, Assistant Superintendent for Business Affairs From: /4 Bobby J. Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation Subject: Desegregation Plan On November 28 and 29, Steve Jones will meet with us to discuss the desegregation plan revisions. We will meet in the conference room at 1:30 p.m. on November 28 and at 9:00 a.m. on November 29. Please make every effort to attend. An Equal Opportunity Employer www.nlrsd.kl2.ar.us Sandy Juckett 11/13/01 09:21 AM To: Bobby Acklin/NLRSD@NLRSD, Dana Chadwick/NLRSD@NLRSD, Danny Reed/NLRSD@NLRSD, Darlene Holmes/NLRSD@NLRSD, Donald Watkins/NLRSD@NLRSD, Esther Crawford/NLRSD@NLRSD, Francical J Jackson/NLRSD@NLRSD, Greg Daniels/NLRSD@NLRSD, James Smith/NLRSD@NLRSD, Jerry Massey/NLRSD@NLRSD, Jim Morris/NLRSD@NLRSD, Letitia Martin/NLRSD@NLRSD cc: Subject: Just a reminder to let you know the Deseg meeting is today at 1 :30 p.m. in the conference room. Sandy Juckett 05/08/01 09:03 AM Sandy Juckett To: Shara Brazear/NLRSD@NLRSD, Dana Chadwick/NLRSD@NLRSD, Esther Crawford/NLRSD@NLRSD, Greg Oaniels/NLRSD@NLRSD, Jim OyeriNLRSD@NLRSD, Francical J Jackson/NLRSD@NLRSD, Jerry Massey/NLRSD@NLRSD, Jim Morris/NLRSD@NLRSD, Danny Reed/NLRSD@NLRSD, James Smith/NLRSD@NLRSD, Donald Watkins/NLRSD@NLRSD cc: Subject: North Little Rock School District Secretary to the Assistant Superintendent of Desegregation DESEG MEETING HAS BEEN CANCELLED FOR TODAY. THANK YOU! Greg Daniels 03/13/01 12:31 PM To: Sandy Juckett/NLRSD@NLRSD cc: Bobby Acklin/NLRSD@NLRSD, James Smith/NLRSD@NLRSD Subject: Deseg Sandy, We have a Intranet training scheduled from 1 - 2 pm for elementary secretaries. I will be unable to attend the Deseg meeting. Thanks, Greg Daniels Director-Computer Services Greg.Daniels@mail.nlrsd.kl2.ar.us 501.771.8025 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT North Little Rock, Arkansas Minutes of the District Desegregation Team Attachment 1 c The North Little Rock School District Desegregation Team met on Tuesday March 12, 2001, at 1 :30 p.m., in the Conference Room of the Administration Building. The following members were present: Bobby Acklin, Shara Brazear, Dana Chadwick, Jim Dyer, Jerry Massey, Mable Mitchell, Jim Morris, Danny Reed, James Smith, and Donald Watkins. Absent members are Greg Daniels, Esther Crawford, and Fran Jackson Mr. Acklin opened the meeting reminding the members the purpose of the Desegregation Team meetings
first that we said we would have meetings and we are still under a desegregation court order. Mr. Acklin mentioned that Little Rock School District was getting ready to go back in to court to ask for unitary status, which will affect us eventually, depending on what the agreement will be as it relates to Magnet Schools and M to M transfers
weather or not the State will continue to pay. Mr. Acklin reported that the Desegregation Monitoring is complete. We will get a copy to you shortly and we will go over the Monitoring Report at the next Biracial Committee meeting. There are some things we know we need some improvement. Some are minor things. Mr. Acklin reported that the Desegregation Office is working on the Civil Rights Report. It's a Federal report we get periodically from Washington. It is a long drawn-out extensive report and we have that completed. We did have to ask for a ten-day extension. Mr. Acklin thanked Mr. Chadwick, Mr. Reed, and Mr. Morris and others who helped gather the information needed. Mr. Acklin reported that our quarterly reports are doing well. Last years is due now and this is the last call we are going to bind what we have and give it to Steve Jones for him to review it and see what is missing, see what we need to included, move around, or make changes. Mr. Jones will mark it up
give it back to us
we make the corrections
we make fresh copies
give Mr. Jones ten copies bound
and Mr. Jones will furnish the different parties a copy. Mr. Morris elaborated on minority teacher recruitment. We actively recruit at Philander Smith, UAPB, Grambling, Jackson State, and Southern. Mr. Morris reminded the committee members that we still have a desegregation plan in effect
there has been no changes in recruitment retention, hiring. Mr. Morris mentioned he would like to send a letter out to the principals reminding them that this is still part of our plan and that we have responsibility for that. Mr. Acklin stated that we try to document everything we do in recruitment. Even the number of jobs offered but turned down. Minutes, Desegregation Team Meeting Page 2 March 12, 2001 Mr. Acklin asked the members if they had anything they wanted to share with the committee. Mr. Reed mentioned that the Special Education Annual Monitoring was during the last part of January and we have not gotten the report back yet. As a matter of fact they still have Argenta Academy to do. One piece of information from the Magnet Review Committee was the County School District informed us at the last meeting, Carl Brown and Jim Johnson that they were probably going to change the magnet selection process to lottery. Mr. Chadwick reported we will have, on this board agenda for Thursday night, recommendations for summer school and that includes the summer school for eighth graders and tuition assistance for high school summer school. Last year we help eighty students with partial tuitions, using free and reduce lunches to qualify. Ms. Mitchell reported on Act 326 of 1997. This is teaching Black History all year. Mr. Acklin read a letter from a parent, Victoria Hester. Mrs. Hester would like to compliment Mr. Warren for the outstanding job he does, she stated that Mr. Warren takes care of business in a professional manner with immediate results. She was very happy with the way he handled her problem. Mr. Acklin went on to say that, Mr. Warren works in Transportation and he works on concerns from parents and touches a lot of different people in all areas of town. When we receive input back from parents like this, it helps the North Little Rock School District to keep a good name. Mr. Acklin thanked those in attendance and adjourned the meeting. Respectfully Submitted, y -~~~Iv I -,
/~..,
Pf f . Sandy Juckett, Secretary N (0)J fiTl.J BII LITTTJLJIEB (O)mCC
:J FUiffIiL ICI C CCI8 I(D )(OI)L ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 2700 POPLAR STREET March 9, 2001 Memo To: Shara Brazear, Communication Specialist . Dana Chadwick, Administrative Director of Secondary Education Esther Crawford, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Greg Daniels, Director of Computer Services Jim Dyer, Director of Federal Programs Francical Jackson, Director of Student Affairs - Jerry Massey, Director of Plant Services Mable Mitchell, School Board Member Jim Morris, Assistant Superintendent for Personnel Danny Reed, Director of Special Services ,.James Smith, Superintendent of Schools Donald Watkins, Assistant Superintendent for Business Affairs From:,4&, Bobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation Subject: Desegregation Team Meeting Just a reminder ... Desegregation Team Meeting, Tuesday, March 13, at 1:30 p.m. in the conference room of the Administration Office. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Sandy Juckett To: Bobby Acklin/NLRSD@NLRSD, Dana Chadwick/NLRSD@NLRSD, Francical J Jackson/NLRSO@NLRSD, Esther Crawford/NLRSD@NLRSD, Greg Oaniels/NLRSO@NLRSD, Jim Dyer/NLRSD@NLRSD, Shara Brazear/NLRSD@NLRSD, Jerry Massey/NLRSD@NLRSD, Jim Morris/NLRSO@NLRSD, James. Smith/NLRSD@NLRSD, Donald Watkins/NLRSO@NLRSD, Danny Reed/NLRSD@NLRSD cc: Subject: North Little Rock School District Secretary to the Assistant Superintendent of Desegregation Desegregation Meeting, Tuesday, March 13 in the conference room at 1 :30p.m. NCO)~'F IBIJ LJ'IIr 'JrJLJEIff iC O<) Cill : 1P1LJJIBLI I3< C l CCJB (IQ )C OJL) l ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 2700 POPLAR STREET October 6, 2000 Memo To: From: Subject: Shara Brazear, Communication Specialist Dana Chadwick, Administrative Director of Secondary Education Esther Crawford, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Greg Daniels, Director of Computer Services Jim Dyer, Director of Federal Programs Francical Jackson, Director of Student Affairs Jerry Massey, Director of Plant Services Mable Mitchell, School Board Member Jim Morris, Assistant Superintendent for Personnel Danny Reed, Director of Special Services James Smith, Superintendent of Schools Donald Watkins, Assistant Superintendent for Business Affairs Bobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation Desegregation Team Meeting Just a reminder Desegregation Team Meeting, Tuesday, October 10, at 1:30 p.m. in the conference roon: of the Administration Office. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER P. 0. UOX 687. NORTH Ll'TVJ'LR ROf:K AR 7?11 r--mi:
s:n i
r11177 1 QAr,fl Sandy: Shara Brazear 10/06/00 12:56 PM To: Sandy Juckett/NLRSD@NLRSD cc: Subject: Re: Tf haamn kusn!a ble to attend the meeting as I will be on vacation that day. Shara W( DI)B T IBII LTITTILJEIB (D)CI[ CI P11JIB3CILCT CI CI8 I(Q )C OI)L ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 2700 POPLAR STREET July 15, 2000 Memo To: James R. Smith, Superintendent From: Bobby J. Acklin, Assistant Superintendent of Desegregation Subject: Status Report on Desegregation Plan Provisions SECTION X-MONITORING District Biracial Committee The North Little Rock School District's District-wide Biracial Committee met during this quarter to analyze data and discuss matters related to District programs. (See Attachment X-Al and X-A2.) District Desegregation Team The North Little Rock School District Desegregation Team did not convene during the fourth quarter. School Monitoring School monitorinS?w
as completed according to the published schedule. Principals were advised cf their ccn11.I111tteers1 nc.1ngs, urenso f conce1.i.iS and suggestions for improvement. Principals were asked to prepare written responses to findings with specific reference to areas of concern. The District's Desegregation Team, the Biracial Committee and member of the North Little Rock School Board of Education (See Attachment X-B) have reviewed schoolmonitoring information. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER P 0. BOX 687, NORTH LITILE ROCK, AR 72115/0687 501/771-8000 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT North Little Rock, Arkansas Minutes of the District Desegregation Team AT'rACHMENTX -B2 The North Little Rock School District Desegregation Team met on Tuesday, March 14, 2000, at I :30 p.m., in the Conference Room of the Administration Building. The following members were present: Bobby Acklin, Shara Brazear, Dana Chadwick, Esther Crawford, Jim Dyer, Francical Jackson, Jerry Massey, Mable Mitchell, Jim Morris, James Smith, and Donald Watkins. Bobby Acklin opened the meeting by announcing three expulsions coming up, one from Belwood Elementary, a male student had a pellet gun and two students from West Campus involved in drug infraction. One was selling and one was buying. Bobby Acklin reported on the Unifonn Committee meeting held on March 13. There was a good turn out with students and adults. There was a long discussion and the majority of the group requested more information. The next Uniform Committee meeting will be April 17. A lengthy discussion on school uniforms followed. Bobby Acklin thanked the team members for their participation and adjourned the meeting. Respectfully Submitted, 0~ Slli1d. . ,..
'.!.~ . -!\.\,,!.'.~ ~"'~ J.. ... !.dfY NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOi, DlSTRfCT North Little Rock, Arkansas Minutes of the District Desegregation Team The North Little Rock School District Desegregation Team met on Tuesday, February 8, 2000, al I :30 p.m., in the Conference Room oflhe Administration Building. The following members were present: Bobby Acklin, Dana Chadwick, Greg Daniels, Jim Dyer, francical Jackson. Mable Mitchell, Jim Morris, and Donald Watkins. Bobby Acklin opened the meeting by giving an update report on school monitoring. Bobby Acklin informed the Desegregation Team of the new Onifoml Committee. Seventy-nine le11erst o parents and students will go out today requesting they altend a meeting on March 13 lo discuss the possibility of school unifonns. Mable Mitchell asked how were the students and parents selected. Dana Chadwick responded that the secondary principals were asked to give names of two parents and two students, one black and one non-blac", from each grade level (6-12). The elementary principals were asked to give names of two parents, one black and one non-black, from each grade level (K-5). Every school will have representation. Bobby Acklin asked Fran Jackson lo speak to the Desegregation Team on the new Truancy Law and how the Biracial Committee will satisfy that law. rrnn Jackson handed out a list of the students sited for truancy during the first semester. She slated that each parent/student handbook addressed truancy. She proceeded with a detailed description of the process followed when a violation of the truancy law has been made. Fran Jackson stated that a new law had been implemented that every school district should organize a Community Truancy Board with a new committee or an existing committee with the approval of tha1 committee. The Community Truancy Board concept was presented to the Birncial Com mince and they have agreed to serve as the Community Truancy B011rd. The primary function of the Community Truancy Board is to recommend method:..::. school a1tendancc. Jim Morris reported on teacher recruitment. Mnble Mitchell remarkedo n Charter chools and asked for feedback from the Desegregation fcam when that moment arises for North Little Rock Schools. Mr. Acklin thanked the tenm members for their participation and adjourned the meeting. Respectfully Submitted, (fi,J~ (J.~Jr Sandy Juc~tt, Secretary N (0)J ET IEI ILITTTILJEJ E(Q)(Cil l: IPTIJiIfLfiI T(C CClB IC IT(D> )I L ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 2700 POPLAR STREET January 14, 2000 Memo To: James R. Smith, Superintendent From~ Bobby J. Acklin, Assistant Superintendent of Desegregation Subject: Status Report on Desegregation Plan Provisions SECTION X-MONITORING District Biracial Committee The North Little Rock School District's Biracial Committee convened monthly during the second quarter. The following officers were elected for 1999 - 2000
Vickie Hendrix, President
Autreana Battles, Vice President
and Sue Brummett, Secretary. (See Attachments X-Al, X-A2, and X-A3.) District Desegregation Team The North Little Rock School District Desegregation Team convened twice during the second quarter to analyze information, discuss policies, procedures, activities and programs related to quality desegregated education. Due to other school functions and c-' responsihilitiPs conflictine with the scheduled meeting the December Desegregation Team meeting was canceled. (See Attachments X-Bl, X-B2, X-B3.) School Monitoring Biracial School Monitoring Teams have been named for 1999 - 2000 school year. (See Attachment X-C.) A.~ EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER P. 0. BOX 687, NORTH LIITLE ROCK, AR 72115/0687 501/771-8000 N -.J 0 0 "C 0 '0 -., ... ... .,... .,.. . "C 0 1:11 0 ~ ' 00 -.J 0 ...... :,- ...... -.J N .... .... Vl 0 ' 00 -.J Vl 0 -.J -.J 0 0 January 6, 2000 Memo To: From: Subject: Shara Brazear, Communication Specialist Dana Chadwick, Administrative Director of Secondary Education Esther Crawford, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Greg Daniels, Director of Computer Services Jim Dyer, Director of Federal Programs Francical Jackson, Director of Student Affairs Jerry Massey, Director of Plant Services Mable Mitchell, School Board Member Jirn Morris, Assistant Superintendent for Personnel Danny Reed, Director of Special Services James Smith, Superintendent of Schools Donald Watkins, Assistant Superintendent for Business Affairs Bobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation Desegregation Team Meeting Just a reminder . .. Desegregation Team Meeting, Tuesday, January 11, at 1:30 p.m. in the conference room of the Administration Office . An Equal Opportunity Employer www.nlrsd.k12.ar.us Due to other school functions and responsibilities conflicting with the scheduled meeting the Desegregation Team meeting was canceled today, December 14, 1999. 1. Welcome Desegregation Committee Meeting Agenda Items Nov-99 2. First Quarter Status Reports were due October 15 Thank you to: Shara Brazear and Jerry Massey Still waiting on a few - you know who you are ... 3. Mr. Chadwick - "The Times" report on Benchmark Scores 4. Mrs. Jackson - Discipline Report 5. Mr. Smith - update "Uniform Committee" 6. Next meeting December 14 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT North Little Rock, Arkansas Minutes of the District Desegregation Team The North Little Rock School District Desegregation Team met on Tuesday, November 9, 1999, at 1 :30 p.m., in the Conference Room of the Administration Building. The following members were present: Bobby Acklin, Dana Chadwick, Esther Crawford, Greg Daniels, Francical J. Jackson, Jerry Massey, Mable Mitchell, Jim Morris, Danny Reed, James Smith, and Donald Watkins. Mr. Acklin remarked how astonishing it is that Monitoring Training and the funeral of Daisy Bates fell on the same day. Mr. Acklin reported Monitoring Training started today with a good turn out, lively and positive group. He reflects that desegregation does not have the negative condemnation that it once had. Monitoring is for two purposes, one to celebrate the good things we are doing and, second, to improve on the negative. Monitoring in the schools will begin now until January 15, 2000. The monitoring report will be available after compiling the Final Reports. Mr. Acklin reported the Biracial Committee has resumed meeting once a month. At the last meeting there was a tremendous tum out and participation. Seeking suggestions for programs to discuss from month to month at the Biracial meetings, Mr. Acklin made an open invitation. Mr. Morris will be asked to speak on personnel recruitment and perhaps Mr. Daniels could talk about the new web site. Mr. Acklin asked if the members had anything to share. Mr. Massey stated next month the revised Building Capacity Report will be ready. Mr. Daniels mentioned the school profile information went out to the schools last week. 1 "- r--.,.,::d- informed the members a group had been established to study Understanding Poverty Issues. Mr. Morris spoke on recruiting efforts. The state required recruiting plan has been completed. He stated Friday, November 5, recruiters visited Grambling University and brought back more contacts, then ever before. If adding teachers and building administrators in the recruiting efforts will get more contacts than that is what we want to do. We will continue to identify minority teacher candidates before we go out and make contact at the career fairs. Confident this year with documentation, we will be able to answer questions for ODM. Mrs. Jackson reported due to space at the NLRHS-East Campus, a closure to special education students has been implemented. Mrs. Jackson will contact Mr. Reed before the second semester for any changes. In the way of discipline, Mrs. Jackson reported, there had been no expulsions this year. There is an expulsion recommendation on the table. A black female from Poplar Street Middle School ' " had a knife at the bus stop. Depending on the pending information, we will send this child to Water Shed. In the Other Placements category, she gave the following information: Black Black White White Proeram Male Female Male Female Total Step One Program 4 1 5 Intervention Step One 0 0 0 0 0 Water Shed 1 1 2 Suspensions for the month of October 1999 is 474, including SAC and Home Suspensions, Boys and Girls Club, and K-6 Suspensions. Last year, October 1998 totaled 582. We had 1,878 referrals out of 1,535 students for the month of October 1999. The major reasons for referrals are 1) disruption, 2) excessive tardiness, 3) disregard for direction of teacher/administrator, and 4) physical abuse of students. We are still experiencing more discipline behavior problems from black children. The percentage of total black referrals is 79.12% and 78.17% students
non-black referrals are 20.87% and 21.82% students. The desegregation plan asks to compare to see if we are consistent with consequences and referrals between black and non-black students and we are. In the category Action Taken, from most to fewer
Detention Hall, SAC, Saturday School, Conferences with Students. Comparing black and non-black, is consistent. Mrs. Jackson reports, she looks for repeat offenders when she reviews the discipline information
if so, how many suspension days and reason. She visits with the building administrator and decides what program would be best suited for each student. She makes use of all facets to help the children before they need to go before the board. She reports building principals have been doing a good job in looking at students and working with assistants and counselors. Mrs. Jackson briefly explained the procedures for the Water Shed Program and the Step One Program. '1 .,h reports this year is one of the smoothest we had, and he feels good about what L going on in the buildings. He hopes we can keep it this way. He commented on improvements at Boone Park Elementary School. Ms. Crawford explained the model program at Boone Park. There are six programs like this in the state. To improve reading scores, particularly first grade, one of our first grade teachers went through intensive training this summer, and she now serves as a resource person in that building to help implement the ideal first grade classroom. In January, we will set up another first grade classroom. It is expensive but well worth it. Mr. Acklin thanked the team members for their participation and adjourned the meeting. Respectfully Submitted, ~i:
:j~ N (0)~ TIBII LTITTILJE~ CO>~CC J PllJiffiILCTCI CCI8 I(Q )(QI)L ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 2700 POPLAR STREET October 15, 1999 Memo To: James R. Smith, Superintendent From~Bobby J. Acklin, Assistant Superintendent of Desegregation Subject: Status Report on Desegregation Plan Provisions SECTION X-MONITORING District Biracial Committee The Biracial Committee did not convene during the first quarter. District Desegregation Team The Desegregation Team did not convene during the first quarter. Sc/zoo[ Monitoring A window of time has been established in which the schools may monitor. The established window of time is November 1, 1999 through January 15, 2000. Iv~v.w.L. 6 .... &lug will be conducted on November 9, from 8:30 a.m. until i l :30 a.m. with an evening session on the same day from 5:00 p.m. until 7:00 p.m. This training will be for the monitors who have never gone through the training before. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER P. 0. BOX 687, NORTH LITILE ROCK, AR 72115/0687 501/771-8000 ~~e,veo SEP 1 9 2003 omcoEF eoESEGREGAMTIOONNl 10R\KG NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRI< North Little Rock, Arkansas Minutes of the District Desegregation Team Attachment 1 d The North Little Rock School District Desegregation Team met on Tuesday, October 12, 1999, at 1 :30 p.m., in the Conference Room of the Administration Building. The following members were present: Bobby Acklin, Shara Brazear, Dana Chadwick, Esther Crawford, Jim Dyer, Greg Daniels, Francical J. Jackson, Jim Morris, Danny Reed, James Smith, and Donald Watkins. Welcoming the committee, Mr. Acklin recommended addressing issues as they arise could help move the meetings along. Mr. Acklin reported receiving a few telephone calls from Seventh Street Elementary parents concerned with one-race classes. He stated that once he has the One-Race Reports from the Principals he would have answers for these parents. He noted when mandatory student assignment was in place, Seventh Street Elementary was racially balanced. He also stated racial interaction among the children does occur between classrooms, field trips, and school assemblies. We look at the whole situation and not just at statistics, but what is best for the children. The next item Mr. Acklin discussed was to direct back to quarterly Status Reports instead of yearly. Mr. Smith mentioned the fact that the Desegregation Plan was outdated and changes have occurred as well as directives from the State Department. Mr. Acklin strongly emphasized the importance of reporting the factual items listed in the Desegregation Plan. Mr. Chadwick informed the members he had received the Eighth Grade Benchmark scores. Mr. Dyer added that the pilot testing was performed in February 1999. Mr. Chadwick reported unfortunate results at Lakewood, Ridgeroad and Rose City Middle Schools, with less than proficient level scores from black students. Mr. Chadwick stated "The Times" might release an article on these scores on Thursday, October 14. Mrs. Jackson reported no expulsions for this school year. She spoke on addressing potential problems before they get to the expulsion point by changing student placement, encouraging principals to look at alternative schools, and parent conferences. Mr. Smith asked Mr. Acklin to check with Al McClendon at the Boys Club concerning a request for a school bus to take students from Boone Park Elementary School to the Boys Club in the afternoons for tutoring. Mr. Dyer gave a brief report on the Penn State Project. He stated the project had been completed last year but with carry-over money, he was concluding an evaluation follow-up with student and teacher surveys. The Penn State Project started approximately four or five years ago and currently the North Little Rock School District has approximately sixty-five students throughout the Elementary schools who participate in this project, (with the majority at Boone Park Elementary). Ms Crawford added, the Penn State Project started at Boone Park Elementary and Central Elementary. When Central Elementary closed, those students were disbursed to other schools. Mr. Smith relayed positive responses from staff members at Boone Park Elementary and Seventh Street Elementary pertaining to the reduction of class size. Mr. Smith noted the reduction of class size is certainly part of the desegregation effort. Mr. Daniels stated the whole atmosphere at Boone Park is different from a year ago. Ms Crawford explained, Mavis Cherry, Principal of Boone Park Elementary, hired excellent teachers, a literacy coach and a parent coordinator
smaller class sizes and purchased new materials, contributed to the improvements. The classes in kindergarten and first grade are making so much progress due to the smaller class size and the teachers are teaching well. Mr. Acklin mentioned the Biracial Committee meetings have begun and by next month all vacancies should be filled. He stated it was suggested Ann Kincl give a presentation on the Gifted Program. At the next Biracial Meeting we may need to reorganize, have introductions to the new members, discuss objectives and the developmental aspects for the Biracial Committee. Mr. Smith announced a need for a committee to study school uniforms this year. This committee will consist of two parents from each school, (black and non-black), a school representative, and students at the secondary level. He asked Mr. Chadwick and Ms Crawford to get with the principals and secure parents for this committee. Mr. Smith suggested the principal could be the school representative. The procedure will be to make a recommendation to the School Board and if the School Board says no then it will go on the school election ballet next year. Mrs. Brazear mentioned it could be difficult getting uniforms for all the students in the District. Mr. Smith mentioned the committee would only need to meet a few times. Ms. Crawford mentioned the cost issue. So many of our children are on the Free or Reduced Lunch Program. Mr. Acklin requested to remind principals, as they develop committees, that the District is biracial and try to include what we have in our district to obtain opportunities for imput. Mrs. Brazear mentioned a concern she had for the twenty non-black nominees on file for the Superintendent's Honor Roll. Mr. Smith said to go outside the staff and look in the community. Mr. Smith briefly mentioned a concern with the teacher shortage issue. Mr. Morris said the number of applicants this year is down over a hundred from what it was five years ago. Mr. Smith noted the District's application would be placed on the District's website for availability. Mr. Smith commented on the District's new Web Master, Doye Wasson. He said she has made a lot of progress with the District's new website, and she will welcome any information you would like to share concerning your department. Mr. Daniels reported he would release the October 1 count when it has been sent to the State Department. Mr. Acklin thanked those in attendance and adjourned the meeting. Respectfully Submitted, ~~9~ Sandy Jucketr, Secretary NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT North Little Rock, Arkansas Minutes of the District Desegregation Team Meeting on February 9, 1999 The North Little Rock School District Desegregation Team met on Tuesday, February 9, 1999, at 1 :30 p.m., in the Conference Room of the Administration Building. The following members were present: Bobby Acklin, Shara Brazear, Dana Chadwick, Esther Crawford, Jim Dyer, Francical J. Jackson, Jim Morris, Danny Reed, James Smith, and Donald Watkins. Bobby Acklin opened the meeting by asking Fran Jackson to give the discipline report. Fran Jackson, Discipline Report for January, 1999 REFERRALS Black males: 811 referrals - 672 students, (139 repeat offenders) Black females: 385 referrals - 339 students, (46 repeat offenders) White males: (23 repeat offenders) White females: (9 repeat offenders) Total number of referrals: 1,517 REASONS Black and White males: 1 )Disruption, 2)Disregard for directions, 3)Physical/threatening abuse Black and White females: 1 )Disruption, 2)Tardiness, 3)Physical/threatening abuse ACTION TAKEN Black males: 1 )Detention hall 2)Others 3)SAC 4)Saturday School White males: 1 )Detention hall 2)Saturday School 3)Others 4)SAC Black females: 1 )Detention hall 2)Saturday School 3)Others 4)SAC White females: 1 )Detention hall 2)SAC 3)Others 4)Saturday School West Campus, East Campus, and the Middle Schools are giving out approximately the same number of suspension days. Boys Club, for the most part, is giving out 3 - 5 and 10-day suspensions. HOME SUSPENSIONS: Three at East Campus
22 at Argenta
1 at Ridgeroad
5 at Amboy
2 at Boone Park
5 at Seventh Street, 5 at Lynch Drive, 3 at Meadow Park, 7 at North Heights, 8 at Park Hill. Total of 59 suspensions. Keep in mind, some of those schools have self-contained classes and the next step is Home Suspension. If you have a self-contained BA class you look for the number to be higher than other schools where there is not a self-contained BA class, because the next step, when that child is out of control is to send him home. The first thing suggested is a Cool Off Day. If the child is totally out of control, rather than suspending him that first day, and you have had the conference with the parent, a Cool Down Day would be implemented. Start off fresh the next day this shows the parents we are trying to work with them. When SAC is full a home SAC is given. This is not coded in our discipline referrals. Comments received from staff members concerning students sent back to their regular campus from Argenta initiated my memo. On that memo I asked if they would contact me if they were having problems. First of all, work with Nancy and if they were still having problems talk with me so that we could reassign those students back to Argenta. I have spoken with Nancy about leaving a cushion space so those students could go back to Argenta. EXPULSIONS The number of expulsions this year has been down. We have 3 (black males) coming up for this school board meeting. A student at Argenta had drugs for the second time, a student at the East Campus struck at a couple of campus supervisors, and a student at Ridgeroad was in possession of a gun. All three sets of parents are aware we are taking their children before the board. A request from John Walker's office for discipline records for all students in secondary schools for the past two years with the exception of the West Campus. A copy of our yearly discipline report for the last two years should suffice. Mr. Acklin read part ofa letter dated January 22, 1999 addressed to Mr. Smith from John Walker. "You will recall in a letter to you dated September 30 that I raised the issue rather the District was acting in good faith with respect to its recruitment placement in hiring African American teachers. As I write this letter my concern remains. I now advise that the district was presented with another opportunity to hire a full time, certified, and qualified African American teacher at the second grade level at North Heights Elementary School. Regrettably the district chose to hire a white non-certified long-term substitute. Mrs. Kristine Gatewood applied for this position and was given an interview however, she did not receive notice from central office personnel that she was not selected for the position. In order that I may be assured I do not have incorrect information would you please provide the following: Applications that qualified for that level Race and Gender District Personnel policy that outlines the hiring process Who was interviewed Who did Ms. Snowden interviewed and resume' Copies of the applicants' sore sheets, including objective criteria used by the hiring officials for scoring" Another letter dated January 28, 1999 from John Walker's office stated they received word that we don't have any minority teachers at Amboy nor Crestwood. "Would you please advise if this information is correct." Mr. Acklin stated we have a minority teacher at Crestwood and at Amboy we have a minority administrator but no minority teacher presently. Mr. Acklin asked for comments or questions around the table. There were none. Meeting was adjourned. Respectfully Submitted, 6~ -C:hotce \ -~-- ~ _/- .,-_. -,>:-
_ :,
~: -_-__~_- ':- "-:( , ..J rilr_~.-.~ ,-.,) N -..J 0 0 0 '0 -., "..'. .., /1) /1) 0 t,:l 0 X ex', -..J 0 .., ... ::," t""' ... /1) ::0 0 n :,
- -..J N .... .... \Jl 0 ex', -..J \Jl 0 -..J -..J -0 0 0 February 3, 1999 Memo To: From: Subject: Shara Brazear, Communication Specialist Dana Chadwick, Administrative Director of Secondary Education Esther Crawford, Administrative Director of Elementary Education Greg Daniels, Director of Computer Services Jim Dyer, Director of Federal Programs Francical Jackson, Director of Student Affairs Jerry Massey, Director of Plant Services Mable Mitchell, School Board Member Jim Morris, Assistant Superintendent for Personnel Danny Reed, Director of Special Services James Smith, Superintendent of Schools Donald Watkins, Assistant Superintendent for Business Affairs Bobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation Desegregation Team Meeting Just a reminder .. . Desegregation Team Meeting, Tuesday, February 9, at 1:30 p.m. in the conference room of the Administration Office. An Equal Opportunity Employer www.nlrsd.k12.ar.us I 283 NCOIB) ~/IrIIBLII TTTILJE~@ CC~ JPTIJIB3CILCI T C ClB CI O(Q))I L ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 2700 POPLAR STREET January 15, 1999 Memo To: James R. Smith, Superintendent From: Bobby J. Acklin, Assistant Superintendent of Desegregation Subject: Status Report on Desegregation Plan Provisions SECTION X-MONITORJNG District Biracial Committee The North Little Rock School District's Biracial Committee convened monthly during the second quarter. The following officers were elected for 1998-1999
Vickie Hendrix, President
Jimmy Maxwell, Vice President
and Sandy Pryor, Secretary. (See Attachments X-Al, X-A2, X-A3 and X-A4.) The committee has identified targeted items to work on during this school year. Items are as follows: (I) Conflict Resolution (2) Poplar Street Middle School Update (3) Overall Elementary Changes (4) Pal Program (5) Argenta Academy Update ( 6) PT A African American Recruitment (7) Parent/Community Component District Desegregation Team The North Little Rock School District Desegregation Team convene monthly during the second quarter to analyze information, discuss policies, procedures, activities and ( programs related to quality desegregated education. (See Attachments X-Bl and X-B2.) School Monitoring Biracial School Monitoring Teams have been named for 1998-99 school year. Training sessions and site visits have been scheduled for December and January. (See Attachment X-C.) AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER P. 0. BOX 687, NORTH LI'ITLE ROCK, AR 72115/0687 501/771-8000 283 1998-99 Desegregation Team Meetings November JO, 1998 1:30 p.m. Conference Room December 8, I 998 1:30 o.m. Conference Room January 12, 1999 1:30 p.m. Conference Room Februarv 9, 1999 1:30 p.m. Conference Room March 9, 1999 1:30 o.m. Conference Room April 13, 1999 1:30 o.m. Conference Room May 11, 1999 l:30p.m. Conference Room June 8, 1999 1:30 p.m. Conference Room NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT North Little Rock, Arkansas Minutes of the District Desegregation Team Meeting on December 8, 1998 The North Little Rock School District Desegregation Team met on Tuesday, December 8, 1998, at I :30 p.m., in the Conference Room of the Administration Building. The following members were present: Bobby Acklin, Shara Brazear, Jim Dyer, Jerry Massey, Mable Mitchell, Jim Morris, Danny Reed, James Smith, and Donald Watkins. Mr. Acklin gave the desegregation team an update on North Little Rock School Monitoring. Not all the schools have turned in their monitoring date. Crestwood, Pike View, North Heights, have completed their monitoring and the East Campus is monitoring today. Monitoring is going well and special attention is focused on committee concerns. A brief report was given at the last Biracial Committee Meeting of the monitoring process. Each monitoring report and principal's response will be complied into booklets and distributed to the Biracial Committee, School Board, Attorney John Walker, and the Office of Desegregation Monitoring. January 15 is the final monitoring date. The State Department has asked the courts to postpone their monitoring in February to acquire information from the three districts that would aid the State in compiling pertinent information to benefit the three districts in their monitoring process. So far the three districts have identified five areas: academic disparity, budget, discipline disparity, staff development, and minority staff recruitment. The three districts agreed with the State in obliterating the "Allen Letter" and start over with the monitoring plan. Attorney John Walker has filed an objection with the courts for the State to postpone monitoring. In his deposition he indicated the State had not used the time they had wisely in working toward making the changes and the Joshua Intervenors were not involved in the process. We will be meeting again with the State on December 16. Dana Chadwick and Esther Crawford have been involved discussing Smart Start. Donald Watkins will be meeting on the 16th as it relates to budget and next month Jim Morris will be ready to discuss staff recruitment. Mr. Acklin gave the team an update of the last Biracial Committee Meeting. A parent on the Biracial Committee gave a presentation on parent involve ::!.! ' and focusing on minority parents. It was a program she had been involved with in Rockford, Illinois. She made a good presentation and offered excellent information to take advisement on. The next Biracial Committee Meeting will be a presentation on our alternative school, Argenta Academy. Danny Reed mentioned the Special Education Advisory committee meeting December 10, 1998, Thursday at 5:00 p.m. Jim Morris mentioned the successful UAPB recruitment trip last week. Bobby Acklin dismissed the meeting. Respectfully submitted, SAK. Juckett(l _ /~/- /I c.9(~ -Eut/4 i!Jyodc EfPokd fl)~ a~cg~ Agenda December I, 1998 Opening/Welcome: Vickie Hendrix, President New Member: Vickie Hendrix, President Grace Guajardo School Monitoring: Bobby J. Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation Special Speaker: Linda Morgan, Parent "Parent Involvement" Agenda Items for Tuesday, January 5, 1999: Vickie Hendrix, President Adjournment: Vickie Hendrix, President SEP 1 9 2003 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT North Little Rock, Arkansas DESEGORFEFGIMCAOETNOIOIFT NO MR"mI NutGes o f t he D1. stnc t De segregat10 n Te arn Meeting on November 10, 1998 Attachment 1 e The North Little Rock School District Desegregation Team met on Tuesday, November 10, 1998, at 1:30 p.m., in the Conference Room of the Administration Building. The following members were present: Bobby Acklin, Shara Brazear, Greg Daniels, Jim Dyer, Fran Jackson, Jerry Massey, Jim Morris, Danny Reed, James Smith, and Donald Watkins. Sandra Juckett recorded the meeting. Esther Crawford and Dana Chadwick were at the Smart Start meeting .. Mr. Acklin opened the first Desegregation Team meeting of the 1998-99 school year by asking Fran Jackson to report district discipline with bottom line figures. He also asked her to report on current issues regarding discipline. Fran Jackson reported from August 1998 through October 1998 a total of 2,193 referrals
however, this reflects a number of students as repeat offenders. The number of referrals is up slightly from last year, but down on black referrals by 2.22%. Disruption is the major reason for referrals followed by excessive tardiness, disregard for direction, and threatening physical abuse. D-Hall is the major action taken on referrals followed by SAC, Saturday School, Conference with Student, and Conference with Student and Parent. Fran Jackson will furnish copies of the Disciplinary Report'to those who so desire. Suspensions are down by fourteen with a total of 542. Major Action taken on suspensions is SAC followed by home suspensions. Fran Jackson explained the different programs available for North Little Rock School District students such as, Argenta Academy, Our Program, Step One Program, Youth Challenge Program, C-Step, and the WaterShed Program. Fran Jackson praised the prosecutor for his stand on truancy. Bobby Acklin discussed a meeting, pertaining to discipline, that Margaret Powell invited him to, along with representatives from the Boys Club, YMCA, Parks and Recreation, CStep Program, Youth Challenge, Fortune 5
This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.