Submitted to the Office of Desegregation and Joshua Intervenors
MEMO To: From: Subject: Date: Ann Linda LRSD Quarterly Status Reports August 2, 2002 Attached is the LRSD Unitary Status 2002 hearing exhibit list of Quarterly Status Reports. We did not receive the reports prior to receiving them as exhibits. The only quarterly reports logged are M-to-M Quarterly Attendance Reports.Lpjo 3. Sample pages from the 2001-02 Middle School (Grades 6-8) Curriculum Catalog published for principals, counselors, registrars, and department chairs or team leaders (includes District mission statement, middle school mission statement, directive to principals about the construction of the master schedule including an emphasis on enrollment in Pre-AP courses, and the Placement Criteria for v Pre-Advanced Placement and Advanced Placement Courses. ) " / AfjEopy of the 2000-01 High School Student and Parent Guide to Course Selection '' and Graduation Requirements (the first such publication in LRSD). y72- 5. Sample pages from the 2001 -02 High School Student and Parent Guide .to Graduation Requirements and Course Selections (includes letter to all LRSD high school students with advice about taking challenging courses, making no excuses for not learning, choosing a Career Focus of interest, taking all the tests seriously. and getting involved in co/extra-curricular activities and a copy of the Districts graduation policy and regulations). 773 6- Sample pages from the 2001-02 High School (Grades 9-12) Curriculum Catalog published for principals, counselors, registrars, and department chairs (includes Instructional Division mission, directive to principals relating to the construction of the master schedulewith emphasis on student enrollment in Pre-AP and AP courses, copies of the policy and regulations relating to Pre-AP and AP courses, and Placement Criteria for Pre-AP and AP courses). / Exhibit No/^ Summary of Assessment/Evaluation Activities by LRSD. Exhibit No.(^ Quarterly Status Report to LRSD Cabinet, April 2000. Exhibit No. Quarterly Status Report to LRSD Cabinet, June 2000. Exhibit No. Quarterly Status Report to LRSD Cabinet, November 2000. Exhibit No.^ Exhibit No. yyy Exhibit No.^^ Quarterly Status Report to LRSD Cabinet, February 2000. Quarterly Status Report to LRSD Cabinet, April 2001. Quarterly Status Report to LRSD Cabinet, June 2001. y77 y 7? Exhibit No.^: y?/ Exhibit No. VFZ. Exhibit No.^ LRSD .Assessment Notebook, August 2000. ECOE/ACSIP Feedback Report 1999. ECOE/ACSIP Feedback Report 2000. yO Exhibit No.(pp ECOE/ACSIP Feedback Report 2001. 38nvY . OU. JUMH w whlklh h m - TTrT XIT* 'f rT^f\ T> A TTTT JUUiN VV. VVAAjCJX9 X ax'-!.* Attorney At Law 1723 Bko-adwat Little Sock, Aix-utSAS 72206 TL?nOw (uClj o7437uo PAY /ems <3*74.41 fi7 NO.382 P.2 JOHNW. WALKEK 5HAW.N UHiUXi 01' OU'u'NbtiL 052?'' VaXtpvov d a DOmV/.McHmY 32x0 nXMUt-fidUN Ku.w Lwlp Boor. .<uiKANSA8 72210 Via Fatsiiniie-447-7flG5 November 30, 2004 PsONt: (501) 372-3426 Rcc (50^ 372-3429 I i Dr. Karen. DeJamette Director, PRE 3Gol Suuihrulaski Littie Rock, AK 72206 Dear Dr. DeJamette
Tz^cU? I am in receipt of the LRSD Quarterly Update dated December 1,2004 to ODM and , Enclosed therein, is a letter to vni, rvr. Pos? dtitcd November 11 2004 indicatinff ULUXk XXV X' V k.t_t r* iiifk.iii I t._iL>^..^_ . . . . .. provide a copy ui ini.s ducuiucju to uxc as 'well. TJpdst?? you ViwHHr Finally, I further note that I have not received a response to my letter to you of November 16.2004. To date, I have not been involved in any initial/preliminary discussions nor have I been provided any Tninutes, notes, documents, etc. reaarding any preliminary meetinas, preliminary conversations qt oonvercations regardinj the Comnliance Remedy ordered bv the I look forward to meeting with you. As I review my calendar for next week, I am available on luesday and Wednesday. Sincerely, Tl-i/*#wkoz) M Wl f T-uT__Tir TT7.,nr.M^ I IV JUUU ** . JWW:js cc
Mr. Gene Jones, ODMI IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ETAL RECEiVED DEC 2 - 2004 DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING INTERVENORS INTERVENORS PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF FILING QUARTERLY UPDATE TO OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING AND JOSHUA Plaintiff Little Rock School District (LRSD) for its Notice of Filing Quarterly Update to Office of Desegregation Monitoring and Joshua dated December 1, 2004 states
1. The attached document is the first quarterly written update by the Little Rock School District and its Planning, Research, and Evaluation Department. It has been provided to the Joshua Intervenors and the Office of Desegregation Monitoring in accordance with the District Courts 2004 Compliance Remedy (Memorandum Opinion of June 30, 2004). 2. LRSD is filing this Quarterly Update so that the Court may be aware of the compliance work done by LRSD to comply with the Courts Memorandum Opinion of June 30, 2004. WHEREFORE, the LRSD submits its Quarterly Update to Office of Desegregation Monitoring and Joshua as required by the Court.Respectfully Submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Friday, Eldredge & Clark Christopher Heller (#81083) 2000 Regions Center 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 (501)376-2011 Christopher Hell^ BTS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the following people by depositing a copy of same in the United States mail on the 1 day of December, 2004: Mr. John W. Walker JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Sam Jones Wright, Lindsey & Jennings 2200 Nations Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON & JONES, P.A. 425 W. Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201-3472 Judge J. Thomas Ray U. S. District Courthouse 600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 149 Little Rock, AR 72201 Desegregation Monitor 1 Union National Plaza 124 W. Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Tim Gauger Mr. Mark A. Hagemeier Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Clayton Blackstock Mr. Mark Burnett 1010 W. Third Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Christopher JJ^ler 2 Attachment furnished November 30, 2004 separately^n Individual Approach to a World of Knowledge April 21,2005 Mr. Gene Jones & Ms. Marjorie Powell Associate Monitors Office of Desegregation Monitoring US District Court 1 Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 received may 27 2005 desegregSmonuorihg Dear Mr. Jones & Ms. Powell: This accompanies a copy of the third quarterly update, in compliance with the June 30, 2004 memorandum opinion of the U.S. District Court, due June 1, 2005. Tucked inside the front is a copy of Dr. DeJamettes letter to Mr. Walker indicating our interest in evaluating the 2U Century Learning Communities as the Joshua intervenors recommended in his letter of May 24 (previously sent to you by Mr. Walker). Please let us know if you would like more information. Thank you for your advice and support in carrying out our responsibilities. Sincerely yo' Director, PRE xc: John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206-1220 Mr. Chris Heller Friday Eldredge & Clark 2000 Regions Center 400 Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 810 W Markham Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 www.lrsd.kl2.ar.us 501-324-2000 fax: 501-324-2032Ct 'h t LUSD Little Rock School District (LRSD) QUARTERLY UPDATE to Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM) and Joshua 'W' - .'
! /'(. FES 2 8 2005 a-e. March 1, 2005 C
T?
:T2R!?!3 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, PLAINTIFF V. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NOT ET AL., DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ETTL., INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL., INTERVENORS Planning, Research, and Evaluation (PRE) Little Rock School District 3001 South Pulaski Little Rock, AR 72206 RECEIVED AUG 29 2005 ft OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING 6^ August 23, 2005 Mr. Chris Heller Friday Eldredge & Clark 2000 Regions Center 400 Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Chris: We are delivering this fourth quarterly written update to you, counsel for Joshua, Mr. Walker, and the Office of Desegregation Monitoring. It is due September 1. Please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions. Director, PRE Department xc: Mr. Gene Jones, Associate Monitor Marjorie Powell, Associate Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring US District Court 1 Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206-1220Little Rock School District (LRSD) QUARTERLY UPDATE to the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM) and Joshua September 1, 2005 received AUS 2 9 2005 OFHCEiX' DESEGREG ATSQM UOMTORUIC LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, PLAINTIFF V. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 ET AL., DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ETAL., INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ETAL., INTERVENORS Planning, Research, and Evaluation (PRE) Instructional Resource Center (IRC) Little Rock School District 3001 South Pulaski Little Rock, AR 72206 C-. &ene. ha-, RECEIVED AUG 2 9 2005 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONUOflJNG August 23, 2005 Mr. Gene Jones, Associate Monitor Marjorie Powell, Associate Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring US District Court 1 Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Gene and Marjorie: We are pleased to deliver this fourth quarterly written update, due September 1, 2005. Please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions. Sincerely yours, Karen DeJamette, Director, PRE Department xc: John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206-1220 Mr. Chris Heller Friday Eldredge & Clark 2000 Regions Center 400 Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Little Rock School District (LRSD) QUARTERLY UPDATE to the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM) and Joshua September 1, 2005 received AUG 2 9 2005 OFFICE Of desegregation aQMcrafiMic LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, PLAINTIFF V. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NOT ETAL., DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ETAL., INTERVENORS KATHERINEKNIGHT, ETAL., INTERVENORS Planning, Research, and Evaluation (PRE) Instructional Resource Center (IRC) Little Rock School District 3001 South Pulaski Little Rock, AR 72206 Introduction This is the fourth quarterly written update by the Little Rock School District (LRSD) and its Planning, Research, and Evaluation (PRE) Department, submitted in accordance with the District Courts 2004 Compliance Remedy (Memorandum Opinion of June 30, 2004, pp. 61-67). The organization of this report is that of the Compliance Remedy: A. LRSD must promptly hire a highly trained team of professionals to reinvigorate PRE. The first task PRE must perform is to devise a comprehensive program assessment B. process which must be deeply embedded as a permanent part of LRSDs curriculum and instruction program. >5 C. During each of the next two academic school years (2004-05 and 2005-06), LRSD hire one or more outside consultants to prepare four (4) formal step 2 evaluations. PRE must (1) oversee the preparation of all eight of these step 2 evaluations
(2) work closely with Dr. Ross and any other outside consultants ... and (3) provide the outside consultants with any and all requested assistance and support. . .' E. Evaluations will contain numbers and grade levels of teachers and administrators who must D. 99 F. contributed data, recommended program changes necessary for improved academic achievement by African-Am erican students, and brief explanations of how each change will increase a programs effectiveness. . . . PRE must notify the ODM and Joshua in writing of the names of those eight programs. In addition, after PRE and Dr. Ross have formulated a comprehensive program assessment process and reduced it to a final draft, PRE must provide a copy to the ODM and Joshua at least thirty days before it is presented to the Board for approval ... by December 31, 2004." 99 G. PRE must submit quarterly written updates on the status of the . . . four step 2 program evaluations . . . during the 2004-05 school year and the four step 2 program evaluations that will be prepared during the 2005-06 school year ... to ODM and Joshua on December 1, March 1, June 1, and September 1... H. [ODMs responsibilities.] I. [Joshuas responsibilities.] J. Four step 2 program evaluations due to the Court October 1, 2005 and four more due October 1, 2006. K. Compliance Report due October 15, 2006. L. [This Compliance Remedy supersedes earlier one.] Page 2Status as of September 1, 2005 A. Hire a highly trained team of professionals. LRSD hired a highly trained team of professionals in 2004 and reported this action in its first quarterly written update of December 1, 2004. This team continues its activities, as stated in this fourth quarterly written update. B. Devise and embed a comprehensive program assessment process. The comprehensive program assessment process, devised by the PRE Department and approved by LRSD Board of Directors December 16, 2004, includes school portfolios among a spectrum of evaluative efforts. (The final draft was in Appendix B of the first quarterly written update.) School portfolios assemble comprehensive data about classrooms, schools, and districts from disparate sources into databases that are accessible and informative particularly to teachers and administrators as well as to board members, parents, and other stakeholders. By aiding identification and description of student groups who achieve less than expected, portfolios are especially useful for formative evaluations of student achievement and the educational programs, schools, and districts that implement them. LRSD is implementing portfolios during 2005-2006. To learn and to implement this model in the LRSD, four PRE Department members attended the first summer institute for data analysis by Education for the Future, conducted by the director. Dr. Victoria Bernhardt, July 25-29. Members of PREYvette Dillingham, Maurecia Robinson, Dr. Ed Williams, and Jim Wohllebwrote portfolios for schools and the district along side employees of other school districts. Appendix A has the press release about the institute. In preparation for their training, Mr. Brad Geise, one of Dr. Bernhardts staff, visited LRSD and reviewed its data collection procedures and resources. From August 28 through September 2, Dr. Bernhardt, the pre-eminent leader of school portfolios, is participating in implementation of her model with PRE staff and school principals. Dr. Bernhardts abbreviated resume is found in Appendix B. C. Hire outside consultant(s) to prepare eight formal step 2 evaluations. Credentials of external evaluators Drs. Catterall and Ross were in this section and Appendix of the first quarterly written update. They undertook step 2 evaluations of four LRSD programs during 2004-2005 whose progress D below describes. For step 2 evaluations in the 2005-2006 school year. Dr. Ross identified four 2.7 programs, named in the June 1 quarterly written update. Joshua subsequently requested that PRE consider evaluating the 21 Century Community Learning Centers. PRE complied with Joshua's request and substituted this evaluation for one of PLATO Learning. (Please see Appendix C for communications about this.) The programs now to be evaluated in 2005-2006 are listed below
Page 3Arkansas A-(- Schools Network, at Woodruff Elementary School, incorporates the arts in teaching language and mathematics. KnowledgePoints is a Supplemental Educational Service (SES)one of several locally availablewhich Bale, Brady, Chicot, Wakefield, and Watson Elementary Schools offer as an after-school learning program. (No Child Left Behind legislation provides for SES programs.) Pre-K literacy development is a comprehensive program implemented in 31 elementary schools with classes for 4-year-old children. 21* Century Community Learning Centers were implemented by Hall and McClellan High, Mabelvale and Henderson Middle, and Woodruff Elementary Schools with funding by the Arkansas Department of Education. Offering various extra educational activities and services, the program continues through 2009 at Mabelvale Middle School
but its funding ends in 2006 at the other schools. D. PRE (1) oversees the preparation of the step 2 evaluations, (2) works closely with Drs. Ross and Catterall, and (3) assists them. PRE continued working closely with Dr. Steven Ross and his team at the Center for Research in Educational Policy (CREP), University of Memphis, and with Dr. James Catterall of UCLA. Dr. Ross team is conducting three step 2 evaluations of LRSD programs, reported March 1, 2004 Compass Learning (CL), Reading Recovery (RR), and Smart/Thrive (S/T)
while Dr. Catterall completed data collection instruments and instructions for his step 2 evaluation of Year-Round Education (YRE). In this fourth quarterly written update, PRE reports further progress for all four step 2 evaluations. Progress on the three evaluations conducted by Dr Ross: CompassLeaming (CL) Data collection for the CL evaluation ended this quarter. It includes the following (as of July 5): Compass Learning Teacher Technology Questionnaires were sent to all 20 Compass Elementary schools of LRSD. Evaluators asked teachers of children who participated to complete a survey. Approximately 425 teachers from all 20 schools returned it. Compass Learning Survey of Computer Use was completed during two-hour lab observations at 7 randomly selected elementary schools. Student Focus Group Interviews were conducted by Dr. Ross staff at four randomly selected elementary schools, where 23 randomly selected 5* grade students participated. Compass Learning Parent Surveys were distributed at five randomly selected elementary schools. One class from each grade at each school was selected, and all parents of children in that class were asked to complete a survey. All five schools returned surveys, and approximately 450 parents participated. Page 4Principal Telephone Interviews were conducted with one elementary school principal. two middle school principals, and their schools had used Compass but one high school principal. They were selected because were no longer implementing the program. Lab Attendant Interviews were conducted via telephone with the lab attendants at six elementary schools where observations took place. This number represents attendants who were active at their respective elementary schools. One schools lab attendant was on sick leave, and the position was covered by substitutes. Technology Specialist Phone Interviews at selected elementary schools. were conducted with five technology specialists District-Level Interviews were conducted over telephone with two LRSD staff members who were directly involved with facilitating Compass. Compass Learning Representative Phone Interview was conducted with the Little Rockarea representative/contact person for Compass Learning. Reading Recovery (RR) The table below summarizes the data available for statistical analysis. Instrument Evaluation of Reading Recovery RR Teacher Questionnaire Classroom Teacher Questionnaire (non-Reading Recovery teachers) Parent Survey Principal Interview (Phone) Teacher in Training Interview (Phone)_________ Implementation Assessment Instrument Actually Collected 22 July 2005 Total Possible 23 Per cent Collected 96% Comments 156 95 10 4 14 95 10 4 14 100% 100% 100% 100% Responses from K-3 teachers in all schools 86 in English 9 in Spanish______________ 2 external observers went to 8 schools. Dr. Anna Grehan completed RR data collection in nine schools from 22 RR teachers 156 (nonRR) teachers in classes to which former RR students proceeded, 95 parents of RR children, 10 principals whose schools coach RR students, and four teachers in training. In addition, Drs. Cliff Johnson of Georgia State University and Melissa Schultz of Ohio State University, both of them experienced and trained observers of the RR program, observed 14 teachers in their classrooms. Page 5SMART/THRIVE (Sm As of July 5, data collected by S/T evaluators, coordinated by Dr. Lyle Davis for Dr. Ross group, included the following: 5 one-hour observations of Saturday tutoring sessions using the School Observation Measure, with Math Instruction addendum, and the Rubric for Student-Centered Activities 144 Student Questionnaires (estimated 76 per cent return rate) 3 student focus groups (5 to 7 students in each focus group) 18 S/T Instructor Questionnaires (estimated 75% return rate) 32 Algebra 1 Teacher Questionnaires (estimated 71% return rate) 34 Parent Questionnaires (estimated 19% return rate) Evaluators used mail-outs and followup data collection at the end of Thrive Carnival to increase the return rate. Smart Program Mentor focus group (group interview with mentors from the Summer 2004 Smart program) Student attendance data at Smart/Thrive sessions Progress on the evaluation conducted by Dr. Catteralh Year-Round Education fYRE') YRE evaluation includes the following: Review of all existing LRSD reports on YRE Detailed review of the longitudinal YRE student test-score database, provided by the PRE Department of LRSD, and construction of trial models for analysis of longitudinal scores accommodating 2005 scores Alternative data cells and alternative data formats have been specified for 2005 student longitudinal achievement assessment Review of 2003 and 2004 student survey data and presentations from participating YRE schools Planning for 2005 student surveys Development of the 2005 parent interview protocol and discussion and exploration of work agreements with professional personnel to conduct parent interviews PRE sent Dr. Catterall a list of all 4*- and 5*-grade teachers at YRE schools and a list of parents and students in both YRE and traditional year schools. Page 6'E. Evaluation will have (1)-numbers and grade levels of teachers and administrators who submit idata for evaluations, (2) recommended program changes necessary for improved achievement by African-American students, and (3) succinct explanations of how each change will increase its respective programs effectiveness. The evaluations will address these requirements when prepared for PREs review later this year. F. Delivery of names of programs to be evaluated and the comprehensive program assessment process to ODM and Joshua. Names of the four programs evaluated during 2004-2005 and the LRSD comprehensive program assessment process were delivered before they were due last year and reported in the first written quarterly update. This fourth written quarterly update names the four LRSD programs selected for step 2 evaluations during 2005-2006. (Please see C above.) PRE has now notified both ODM and Joshua of all eight LRSD programs selected for step 2 evaluations and furnished both parties with the comprehensive program assessment process per F of the June 30,2004 remedy by the US District Court (page 65). G. PRE must submit quarterly written updates on the status of step 2 evaluations. Per F of the June 30, 2004 remedy by the US District Court (page 65), PRE submitted its first written quarterly update on December 1, 2004, its second on March 1, 2005, its third by June 1, 2005, and now this fourth written quarterly update prior to September 1, 2005. To date, PRE has met all due dates of this remedy. Page 7Appendices A. Data Analysis Institute: Portfolios B. External Consultant for Portfolio Development C. Correspondence with Joshua Page 8A. Data Analysis Institute: Portfolios FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE School District Personnel Continue Learning Education for the Future, Chico, California - July 29, 2005 While many of their colleagues and students were enjoying a vacation, members of the Planning, Research, and Evaluation Department of the Little Rock School District spent a week improving their own knowledge about collecting, analyzing, and using data to improve learning for all students. Yvette Dillingham, Maurecia Robinson, Dr. Ed Williams, and Jim Wohlleb joined more than 40 school personnel from across the United States in a week-long Data Analysis Institute in Chico, California. Conducted by Dr. Victoria Bernhardt, renowned data expert and Executive Director of Education for the Future, the Institute focused on developing data profiles of each learning organization to improve processes and operations to increase student learning and to build its capacity to make decisions based on actual data. Information Contact: Joy Rose mjroseJ 14@aol.com Education for the Future 400 West First Street Chico, CA 95929-0230 530-898-4482 http://eff.csuchico.edu Page 9B. Victoria L. Bernhardt, Ph. D. Director, Education for the Future Page 10Victoria L. Bernhardt 400 W. First Street, Chico, CA 95929-0230 EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND Ph.D. University of Oregon, Eugene, OR. Major area in Educational Psychology Research and Measurement and minor area in Mathematics. M.S. Iowa State University, Ames, lA. Degree in General Graduate Studies
major areas in Statistics, Psychology, and Education. B.S. Iowa State University, Ames, lA. Major in Psychology and Minor in Mathematics. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE_________________________________ Education for the Future Initiative, Department of Professional Studies in Education, California State University, Chico, California 1991 - Tenure, College of Communication and Education, Department Professional Studies in Education, California State University, 1997. of Director, Institute for Advanced Studies in Education, University, Chico, 1986-91. California State California Commission on Teacher Credentialing, Sacramento, 1981-1986. California, Office of Program Evaluation and Research, California State Department of Education, Sacramento, California, 1980-1981. Research, Development and Evaluation Division, Eugene Public School District, Eugene, Oregon, 1979-1980. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, Portland, Oregon, 1976-1979. PUBLICATIONS (2000 - PRESENT) Published Books Bernhardt, V.L. (2005). Using data to improve student learning in school districts. Larchmont, NY
Eye on Education, Inc. Bernhardt, V.L. (2005). Using data to improve student learning in high schools. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education, Inc. (2005) . Bernhardt, V.L. (2004). Using data to improve student learning in middle schools. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education, Inc. (2004). Page 11Bernhardt, (2nd V.L. (2004). Data analysis for continuous school ed.). Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education, Inc. improvement. Bernhardt, V.L. (2003) . Using data to improve student elementary schools. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education, Inc. learning in Bernhardt, V.L. (2002) . The implementation, school portfolio toolkit: A planning, and evaluation guide for continuous school improvement. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education, Inc. Bernhardt, V.L. (2000). Designing and using improvement. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education, Inc. databases for school Bernhardt, V.L. & Others (2000). The example school portfolio, A companion to the school portfolio: A comprehensive improvement. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education, Inc. framework for school Published Refereed Journal Articles , chapters , Monographs , and Newsletters . Bernhardt, V.L. (2005, February). Data tools for school improvement. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). Educational Leadership Volume 62, Number 5. Herman, J. & Winters, L. (2005). Tracking your school's success]. Corwin Press, Inc. School Success [Review of manuscript Mausbach, A. (2004). Assessment [Review of manuscript Six steps to help you and your principals use assessment data Superintendents insider]. Brownstone Publishers, Inc. effectively: School Murnane, R. J., instruction Boudett, K, Journal of [Review < Research & City, E. (2004) . of manuscript Using data Using data to improve and Development Council. Professional to improve instruction: Development]. National Staff Bernhardt, V.L. (2004, November/December). Continuous improvement: It takes more than test scores. Association for California School Administrators
Leadership, 16 - 18. Bernhardt, V.L. (2004). Data Analysis. In L. Easton (Ed.), Powerful Designs for Professional Development. Council (NSDC). Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Bernhardt, V.L. (2003, Fall). Requirements to district. The Leadership Academy Newsletter. (2) become a data-driven Bernhardt, V.L. (2003, achievement. No February). schools left behind. Using data to improve student Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). Educational Leadership Volume 60, Number 5. Bernhardt, V.L. (2000, development of a Fall). Building leadership capacity through the school portfolio. The Leadership Academy Developer, published by Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Jefferson City, MO. Bernhardt, V.L. (2000, Winter). Intersections: How crossing data can help you piece together a clearer picture of your school. Development. Journal of Staff Page 12FEATURED PRESENTATIONS (2000 - PRESENT) Keynote Addresses and Featured Presentations Bernhardt, V.L. (2005, Florida Association School Administrators July). Using Data to Improve Student Learning, of School Administrators and Dade Association First Administrators. Statewide of Summer Leadership Academy of Bernhardt, V.L. (2005, April). Using Data to Improve Student Learning in Middle Schools, Using Data to Improve Student Learning in School District, and The School Portfolio Toolkit. to Improve Education. Conference sessions. Wichita, KS. Kansas State Department of (2005, Bernhardt, V.L. (ZUU5, April). Data Driven School Improvement. National School Board Association (NSBA). General session. San Diego, CA. Bernhardt, V.L. (2005, March). Doing the Most With Groiifing It. TetraData User's Conference. Greenville, Your Marehouse and SC. Bernhardt, V.L. (2005, February). Using Data to Improve Student Learning. American Association of School Administrators TIASA). Conference sessions. San Antonio, TX. (hASA). Bernhardt, V.L. (2004, December). Using data to improve student learning in middle schools. National Staff Development Conference. Vancouver, BC. Easton, L., Bernhardt, V.L., & Lewis, C. (2004, December). Planning, designing, and implementation of effective professional development. session. National Staff Development Conference. Vancouver, BC. L. , V.L. , C. December). PreBernhardt, V.L. Keynote (2004, November). Using Data to Improve Student Learning. address. Assessment and Data Analysis. Administrators' Assessment Conference. Myrtle Beach, SC. Analysis. Bernhardt, V.L., framework for & Geise, Continuous B. (2004, November). School Improvement. The school portfolio: Schools Fall Forum. San Francisco, CA. Coalition of Essential Bernhardt, V.L. data. (2004, November). Engaging staffs in conversations about Texas Elementary Principals Conference. Arlington, TX. and Supervisors Association. Fall A Bernhardt, V.L. (2004, August). Using Data to Inform Instruction. address. Santa Clara County Office of Education. San Jose, CA. Keynote Bernhardt, V.L. (2004, June). Pulling it all together. Keynote address. 13'" Annual Standards and Assessments Conference. Denver, CO. Bernhardt, V.L. Continuous School (2004, April). Decisions. Denver, CO. Improvement. Data Analysis Colorado and Consortium its Importance for for Data Driven Bernhardt, affects V.L. student (2004, April). performance. Data driven decision making and how it Development Council. Hershey, PA. Keynote address. Pennsylvania Staff Bernhardt, V.L. (2004, March). Big Things Come in Small Packages. User's Conference. Greenville, SC. Page 13 TetraDataBernhardt, V.L. (2004, March). The School Professional Development Center. Exeter, NH. Portfolio Toolkit. Seacoast Bernhardt, V.L. (2004, March). Working Smarter, Not Harder, ivith Effective Association Use of Data. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). Conference sessions. New Orleans, LA. Bernhardt, V.L. (2004, March). Engaging Staffs in Conversations about Data. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). Conference sessions. New Orleans, LA. V.L. Bernhardt, (2004, February). Using data to improve student learning across school districts. American Association of School Administrators (AASA). Conference sessions. San Francisco, CA. Bernhardt, V.L. must invest in (2004, February). Data ivarehousing: to close the achievement What every district gap. School Administrators (AASA). Conference sessions. American Association of San Francisco, CA. Bernhardt, V.L. (2004, January). Using data to improve student performance. New Hampshire Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). Full day Conference session. Concord, NH. Bernhardt, V.L. (2003, December). Using data to improve student learning in elementary schools. National Staff Development Council (NSCD). Full day Pre-conference session. New Orleans, LA. Bernhardt, address. (2003, October). V.L. Analyzing student achievement. Keynote Minnesota Association of Administrators and Federal Education Programs. Brooklyn Park, MN. Bernhardt, V.L. (2003, October). Data analysis for comprehensive school^ide improvement. Connecticut Association Development (ASCD). Rocky Hill, CT. for Supervision and Curriculum Bernhardt, V.L. (2003, September). Data and school improvement. North Dakota Conference on Educational Improvement. Bismarck, ND. Keynote. Bernhardt, V.L. (2003, August). Planning and using data to improve student learning. Montana Superintendents' Conference. Lewiston, MT. Bernhardt, V.L. (2003, July). Using your data for continuous schoolhride improvement. TetraData User's Conference. San Jose, CA. Bernhardt, V.L. (2003, July) . Getting Started hrith data driven decision making. Pennsylvania Governor's Conference, Selinsgrove, PA. Bernhardt, V.L. (2003, April). Learning Community. Orlando, FL. Facilitate Leadership Hetreat. South Bernhardt, V.L. (2003, March). Needs assessment South Carolina State Department of Education. Columbia, SC. and student achievement. Bernhardt, V.L. (2003, February). Using your data for continuous schoolwide improvement. Keynote. TetraData User's Conference. Greenville, SC. Bernhardt, V.L. (2002, December). The school portfolio toolkit: A planning, implementation and evaluation guide for continuous school improvement. National Staff Development Council (NSCD). Pre-conference 2-day session. Boston, MA. Page 14Bernhardt, V.L. (2002, December). Using your data to improve student learning. WestEd Board Meeting. San Francisco, CA. Bernhardt, V.L. (2002, December). Data analysis for comprehensive schoolwide improvement. New England Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). Boston, MA. Bernhardt, V.L. (2002, September). Data analysis for comprehensive schoolwide improvement. Idaho Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). Couer d'Alene and Boise, ID. (2002, July). Leading the Culture of Change with Data-Driven Bernhardt, V.L. Decision Making. National Academy for Superintendents. Columbus, OH Bernhardt, V.L. improvement. (2002, July). Data analysis for comprehensive schooiwide New York Comprehensive Facilitator's Academy. Cooperstown, NY. District Education Planning Bernhardt, V.L. (2002, July). The school portfolio toolkit: A planning. implementation and evaluation guide for continuous school improvement. New York Comprehensive District Education Planning Facilitator's Academy. Cooperstown, NY. Bernhardt, V.L. (2002, June). Using data to make instructional decisions. Montana Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) Summer Institute. Helena, MT. Bernhardt, V.L. (2002, June). The school portfolio toolkit: A planning, implementation and evaluation guide for continuous school improvement. Gwinnet County School District. Athens, GA. Bernhardt, V.L. (2002, May). Keynote speaker for graduation ceremony. Point Loma Nazarene University. San Diego, CA. Bernhardt, V.L. (2002, May). Data analysis for comprehensive schoolwide improvement. Monroe County Intermediate School District. Monroe, MI. Bernhardt, V.L. (2002, April). Data analysis for comprehensive schoolwide improvement. Los Lunas School District. Los Lunas, NM. Bernhardt, V.L. (2002, April). Data analysis for comprehensive schoolwide improvement. New Jersey State Department of Education. New Brunswick, NJ. Bernhardt, V.L. (2002, April). Data driven decision making. University of Minnesota. St. Cloud, MN. Bernhardt, V.L. (2002, March). The school portfolio toolkit: A planning. implementation and evaluation guide for continuous school improvement. National Staff Development Council (NSDC). Greenville, SC. Bernhardt, V.L. (2002, March). The school portfolio toolkit: A planning. implementation and evaluation guide for continuous school improvement. Tan-Tar-A Show-Me Conference. Osage Beach, MO. Bernhardt, schoolwide V.L. (2002, Bloomington, IN. improvement. February). Indiana Data State analysis for Department of comprehensive Education. Bernhardt, V.L. (2002, February). Data analysis for comprehensive schoolwide improvement. Kansas City School District. Kansas City, MO. Page 15Bernhardt, V.L. {2002, February). The school portfolio: A comprehensive framework for school improvement. Wentzville School District. Wentzville, MO. Bernhardt, V.L. (2002, schoolwide improvement. Bismarck, ND. February). North Data Dakota analysis for State Department comprehensive of Education. Bernhardt, V.L. (2001, December). The school portfolio toolkit: A planning, implementation and evaluation guide for continuous school improvement. Westerville School District. Westerville, OH. Bernhardt, V.L. (2001, October). The school portfolio toolkit: A planning, implementation and evaluation guide for continuous school improvement. The Leadership Academy. Springfield, MO. Bernhardt, V.L. (2001, October). The school portfolio toolkit: A planning, implementation and evaluation guide for continuous school improvement. The Leadership Academy. Columbia, MO. Bernhardt, V.L. (2001, October). Data analysis for comprehensive schoolwide improvement and The school portfolio: A comprehensive framework school improvement. The Leadership Academy. Springfield, MO. for Bernhardt, V.L. (2001, October). Data analysis for comprehensive schoolwide improvement. South Carolina Staff Development Council. Charleston, SC. Bernhardt, V.L. (2001, October). Data analysis for comprehensive schoolwide improvement. North Central Educational Service District. Wenatchee, WA. Bernhardt, V.L. (2001, August). Data analysis for comprehensive schoolwide improvement and The school portfolio: school improvement. Conference. Seattle, WA. Washington Education A comprehensive framework for Association (WEA) State Bernhardt, V.L. (2001, July). Data analysis for comprehensive schoolwide improvement. Keynote address. The Learning Network 7^ Portland, OR. Annual Conference
Bernhardt, V.L. for comprehensive (2001, June). Data driven decision making
Data analysis schoolwide improvemen t
The school portfolio: comprehensive framework for school improvement
and Designing and using databases for school improvement. Connecting Classrooms, Communities, and Careers 2001. Beaver Creek, CO. Bernhardt, V.L. improvement and (2001, June). Data analysis for comprehensive schoolwide The school portfolio: A comprehensive framework for school improvement. Administrators' Conference. Pioneer RESA Atlanta, GA. Bernhardt, V.L. improvement and (2001, June) . The school portfolio: Data analysis for comprehensive schoolwide A comprehensive framework for school improvement. The Advanced Satellite Academy Graduation. Leadership Academy. Lake Ozark, MO. Bernhardt, V.L. improvement. (2001, April). Data analysis for comprehensive schoolwide Utah School Education. Sandy, UT. Improvement Conference. Utah Office of Bernhardt, V.L. improvement , and (2001, April). Data analysis for comprehensive schoolwide The school portfolio: A comprehensive framework for A Page 16school improvement. South East Kansas Educational Service Center. KS. Girard, Bernhardt, V.L. (2001, April). Education Decision Systems Meeting. United States Department of Education's Information Officer. Portland, OR. Invitational Office of the Chief Bernhardt, support V.L. , presented by Lauck, M. the understanding of student (2001, March). achievement. Technology can Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). Boston, MA. Association for Bernhardt, V.L. (2001, February). The school portfolio and data driven systems. Kansas City area administrators. University of Missouri. Kansas City, MO. Bernhardt, V.L. (2000, December). Developing school portfolios: collecting and using data at the school level. Washington Educational Research Association (WERA) State Assessment Conference. Seattle, WA. Bernhardt, V.L. (2000, December). continuous schooli^ide improvement. Tools and strategies for assessing (NSDC) Annual conference. Atlanta, GA. National Staff Development Council Bernhardt, schoolwide V. L (2000, improvement. September). North Data Dakota Improvement. General Session. Fargo, ND. analysis Conference for comprehensive on Educational Bernhardt, V. L (2000, September). The school portfolio: A comprehensive framework for school improvement. North Dakota Conference on Educational Improvement. General Session. Fargo, ND. Bernhardt, V.L. measures of data. (2000, September). Gathering and analyzing multiple Conference. Nashville, North Central Association Commission on Schools Fall IN. Bernhardt, V.L. (2000, framework for school July). The improvement. school portfolio: A comprehensive Program, Disney Learning Institute. Orlando, FL. Creative Learning Communities Grant Bernhardt, V.L. (2000, July). Perspectives from assessment experts, panelist. National Coalition for Technology in Education and Training (NCTET). Incline Village, NV. Bernhardt, V.L. (2000, June) . Data use in schools. Education Research. Madison, WI. Wisconsin Center Bernhardt, V.L. (2000, May). Data analysis for comprehensive schoc^ improvement. Maine Association for Supervision and Curriculum Deveicc (ASCD). Portland, ME. Bernhardt, V.L. (2000, March) . Da ta SchoolNet State Technology Conference. Columbus, OH. analysis and systemic change. Bernhardt, V.L. (2000, March). Technology planning panel discussion. C SchoolNet State Technology Conference. Columbus, OH. Bernhardt, V.L., Lauck, M. , & Geise, B. (2000, February) . Data gathering and use. Ten presentations. UCAN Rural Systemic Initiative. Albuquerque, NM. Page 17Bernhardt, V.L. (2000, schoolwide improvement. Angeles, CA. February). Data analysis for comprehensive Los Angeles Annenberg Metropolitan Project. for Los Bernhardt, V.L. expectations, (2000, local January). action. Making successful standards results. real: Leadership Academy, Convocation 2-000. Burlingame, CA. California Statewide School Bernhardt, V.L. (2000, January) . Data analysis for comprehensive schoolwide improvement and The school portfolio: school improvement. Galef Institute. A comprehensive framework for Los Angeles, CA. MEDIA PRESENTATIONS (2000 - PRESENT) Bernhardt, V.L. (2004, Improvement. Cyberchat, South Australia. May) . Data Analysis for Continuous School Department of Education and Children's Services. Bernhardt, V.L. (2004, January). Educational Impact. Warminster, PA. The school portfolio. Cyberchat, Bernhardt, V.L. (2002, February). Data analysis schoolwide improvement and The school portfolio: framework for school improvement. Video Training. Ringold, PA. (2002, school for A comprehensive comprehensive Education On-Line. New Bernhardt, V.L. (2002, January). Data analysis for comprehensive schoolwide improvement. Instruction. Statewide videoconference, Montana Office of Public Bernhardt, V.L. (2001, December). Analyzing data for school improvement. Video conference. Northview School District. Grand Rapids. MI Bernhardt, V.L. (2001, January). Designing and using databases for school improvement. Statewide videoconference. Montana Office of Public improvement. Instruction. videoconference. Bernhardt, V. L (2000, October). Data analysis for comprehensive schoolwide improvement. Statewide videoconference, Montana Office of Public Instruction. Montana of Bernhardt, V.L. improvement. Helena, MT. (2000, June). Videoconference, Designing and using databases for school Montana Office of Public Instruction. Bernhardt, V.L. (2000, January). framework for school Office of Public Instruction. improvement. The school portfolio: Statewide videoconference. A comprehensive Montana Bernhardt, V.L. (2000). Databases. A Multimedia Presentation Education for the Future Initiative and its work on databases. (2000). of the Page 18C. Correspondence with Joshua regarding 2r^ Century Community Learning Centers Request to evaluate 2P^ Century Community Learning Centers Letter of John W. Walker May 24, 2005 Approval of requested evaluation Letter of Steven M. Ross, Ph.D. July 20,2005 Page 19MAY. 24.2005 12= 15PM JOUS U WALKER P A NO.778 P.2 JOHN W. WALKER, PA. ATTOBHrrAiUw 17M BsoADm Liriss Boost aikansas -72206 TYn.CTB-nira (501) 374-37EB FAX (601) 574-4137 JOHlf W. TOtLKBK SBJ0M OSILIIS OF COttHSEL ROBSaTMiHBNEPX DONNAJ. McKSMSY 8210 HeMDBBSOHHXUD Lrmz Sficz, aicamas 72310 JHOMK (Ml) 372^ pjj (501) 373*3428 B^anj wAjtmydflig'aalLajt May 24,2005 Karen DeJamette, PitD. Little Rock School District 3001 Pulaski Little Rock, AR 72202 Dear Dr. DeJamette-. Thank you for providing the list of programs, interventions, and models in the Little Rock School District -which you indicate was prepared by the District last year. I am also in receipt of the list of programs that you intend to submit to the Board for approval in ydth the courts order. Joshua notes that the 21 Century Comm unity T j^Tning Centers are in at least 10 schools (Hall High, McClellan, and J. A. Fair
Alternative Learning Center, Henderson. Mabelvale, Southwest, and Cloverdale
and Meadoweliff and Woodruff) in the district In addition, the program description indicates that there are si^ort programs being utilise to student achievement. We, therefore, propose the 21 Century Community Learning adoption by the Board for evaluaaon. ( sincerely, ! xj (ohn W. Walker JWWjs co: Mr. Gene Jones, ODM Mr. Chris Heller Mr. Bob Pressman Page 20 MEMPHIS. A Tennessee Center of Hxceiieni 325 Browning Hal! Memphi: inessee S152-334C Office: 901.67S.231C I oil-Free
866.670.6147 July 20. 2005 Fax: 901.678.4257 www.memphis.edu/cre? Dr. Karen DeJamette Director, PRE Department Little Rock School District 3001 S. Pulaski Little Rock, AR 77206 Dear Dr. DeJamette: I have reviewed ihe 21 Century Community Learning Centers proposed for one of the Step 2 evaluations in the 2005-2006 school year. They serve large numbers of African- American students and continue for another one to four years. I believe that this prosram is another appropriate choice for a Step 2 evaluation. I look forward to working with you and PRE personally on the first three studies (a-c). Please feel free to contact me if any additional information is needed. Sincerely. Steven M. Ross, Ph.D. Faudree Professor and Director Center for Research in Educational Policy A I emessee soars o/ Reoencs InsUlutlor An teuM Osortwt-. tf- revivve A&on tn>vr-_r,Si S RECEIVED SEP - 1 2005 August 29, 2005 OFFICE OF desegregation MONITORING JohnW. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206-1220 Dear Mr. Walker
As indicated in the fourth quarterly written update of September 1, the PRE Department is introducing a district portfolio to the Little Rock School District. This effort responds in part to the US District Courts requirement to embed evaluation in the District. Our primary resource for this is Dr. Vickie Bernhardt, described in the fourth update. Dr. Bernhardt is visiting with us this week and presenting a workshop for directors of the Education Services Group, whose agenda accompanies this letter. We invite you to attend should this interest you. Please contact us for more information. Sincerely yours, Karen DeJamette, Ph.D, Director, PRE Department xc
Mt. Gene Jones, Associate Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring US District Court 1 Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Chris Heller Friday Eldredge & Clark 2000 Regions Center 400 Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 AGENDA AGENDA DATA ANALYSIS WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 31,2005 Outcomes Everyone understands - What data are important for Continuous School Improvement 9.00 With Education Services Group - Welcome / Introductions/Agenda/Logistics What Data Are Important for Continuous School Improvement - Demographics - Perceptions - Student Learning - School Processes How data are important for Continuous School Improvement planning 10:30 Data Analysis Case Study How to work through a "problem" with data 11:30 Lunch 12:30 Continue with Case Study Group Work: Solving a Problem with Data - Share your problem-solving situation Pulling it altogether Questions and Answers 3:00 Closing Eiiuattion /or the Future Victariu L RemhardlRECEIVED SEP -6 2005 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION OmCEOF DESEGREGATION MONITORING LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1,ETAL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS LRSDS NOTICE OF FILING QUARTERLY UPDATE Little Rock School District (LRSD) for its Notice of Filing Quarterly Update dated September 1, 2005 states: 1. The attached document is the fourth quarterly written update by the Little Rock School District and its Planning, Research, and Evaluation Department. It has been provided to the Joshua Intervenors and the Office of Desegregation Monitoring in accordance with the District Courts 2004 Compliance Remedy (Memorandum Opinion of June 30,2004). 2. LRSD is filing this Quarterly Update so that the Court may be aware of the compliance work done by LRSD to comply with the Courts Memorandum Opinion of June 30, 2004. WHEREFORE, the LRSD submits its Quarterly Update as required by the Court.Respectfully Submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Friday, Eldredge & Clark Christopher Heller (#81083) 2000 Regions Center 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 (501)376-2011 BY: Christopher Heller CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the following people by depositing a copy of same in the United States mail on the 31 day of August, 2005: Mr. John W. Walker JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Desegregation Monitor 1 Union National Plaza 124 W. Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Sam Jones Wright, Lindsey & Jennings 2200 Nations Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON & JONES, P.A. 425 W. Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201-3472 Mr. Tim Gauger Mr. Mark A. Hagemeier Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Judge J. Thomas Ray U. S. District Courthouse 600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 149 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Clayton Blackstock Mr. Mark Burnett 1010 W. Third Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Christopher Heller 2 RECEIVED NOV 2 8 2005 OmCEOF desegregation MONITORING November 21, 2005 Mr. Gene Jones, Associate Monitor Ms. Marjorie Powell, Associate Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring US District Court 1 Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201-3714 Dear Mr. Jones and Ms. Powell: We are pleased to deliver this fifth quarterly written update, due December 1, required by the U. S. District Courts 2004 Compliance Remedy (Memorandum Opinion of June 30, 2004, pp. 61-67). Sincerely yours, Caren DeJamette, Pn.D. Director, PRE Department xc: Mr. Chris Heller Friday Eldredge & Clark Mr. John Walker Mr. Robert Pressman -J up ' RECEIVED Little Rock School District NOV 2 8 2005 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING QUARTERLY UPDATE to the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM) and JOSHUA December 1,2005 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, PLAINTIFF PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NOT ETAL., DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ETAL., INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ETAL., INTERVENORS Planning, Research, and Evaluation Department (PRE) Instructional Resource Center (IRC) Little Rock School District 3001 South Pulaski Little Rock, AR 72206February 28,2006 RECEIVED MAR 1 - 2006 Mr. Gene Jones & Ms. Marjorie Powell Associate Monitors Office of Desegregation Monitoring US District Court 1 Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 OFRCEOF desegregation MONITORING Dear Mr. Jones & Ms. Powell: This accompanies a copy of the quarterly written update of March 1, 2006, in compliance with the June 30, 2004 memorandum opinion of the U.S. District Court. Please let us know if you would like more information. Thank you for your advice and support in carrying out our responsibilities. Sincerely yours, Karen DeJamett^Ph.D. Director, PRE xc: Mr. Chris Heller Friday Eldredge & Clark 2000 Regions Center 400 Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201Little Rock School District Planning, Research, and Evaluation 3001 South Pulaski Street Little Rock, AR 72206-2873 FAX 501/447-7609 February 28, 2006 John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206-1220 Dear Mr. Walker: This accompanies the quarterly written update of March 1, 2006 in compliance with the U. S. District Courts 2004 Compliance Remedy (Memorandum Opinion of June 30, 2004, pp. 61-67). Sincerely yours, Director, PRE Department xc
Mr. Chris Heller Mr. Gene Jones Ms. Marjorie Powell Mr. Robert Pressman Little Rock School District Planning, Research, and Evaluation 3001 South Pulaski Street Little Rock, AR 72206-2873 FAX 501/447-7609 February 28, 2006 Robert Pressman 22 Locust Avenue Lexington, MA 02421-5817 Dear Mr. Pressman: This accompanies the quarterly written update of March 1, 2006 in compliance with the U. S. District Courts 2004 Compliance Remedy (Memorandum Opinion of June 30, 2004, pp. 61-67). Mr. Walker has asked that we furnish you with copies of reports. Sincerely yours, Director, PRE Department xc: Mr. Chris Heller Mr. Gene Jones Ms. Marjorie Powell Mr. John Walker I arl-Cir/y Up do ft I Little Rock School District (LRSD) I I QUARTERLY UPDATE I to the I Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM) and Joshua Intervenors I March 1, 2006 I I I LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, PLAINTIFF V. I I PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. ET AL., DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL., INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL., INTERVENORS I I I I I Planning, Research, and Evaluation Department (PRE) Instructional Resource Center (IRC) Little Rock School District 3001 South Pulaski Little Rock, AR 72206Little Rock School District Planning, Research, and Evaluation 3001 South Pulaski Street Little Rock, AR 72206-2873 FAX 501/447-7609 May 31, 2006 recede Mr. Gene Jones & Ms. Maijorie Powell Associate Monitors Office of Desegregation Monitoring US District Court 1 Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 MAX 311006 wbJSS8* Dear Mr. Jones & Ms. Powell: Accompanying this is a copy of the Quarterly Update of June 1, 2006 to the U. S. District Court. FiJjuA. Please let us know if you require more information. Sincerely yours. Karen D Director xc: Mr. Heller Mr. Hattabaugh Mr. Walker 1 Little Rock School District (LRSD) QUARTERLY UPDATE to the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM) and Joshua Intervenors / w
.4 - 'Tk . \ ** II I T I IlC i j LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, PLAINTIFF J - ,deeendA June 1, 2006 .. ..h A it PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. ET AL., MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL., INTERVENORS r KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL., INTERVENORS J- :^NTS Planning, Research, and Evaluation Department (PRE) Instructional Resource Center (IRC) Little Rock School District 3001 South Pulaski Little Rocky AR 72206 (Margie Page 1 of 1 From
To
Sent
Subject
"Dejarnette, Karen" <Karen.Dejarnette@lrsd.org> "Margie" <mqpowell@odmemail.com> Wednesday, August 09, 2006 5:27 PM FW: quarterly From: Dejarnette, Karen Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 5:23 PM To: Griffin, Beverly Cc: Roberts, Olivine
Hattabaugh, Hugh
Brooks, Roy G Subject: RE: quarterly Beverly, I posted the agenda item and draft report on yesterday, the 8. However, it's okay with PRE if the Board does not consider the report tomorrow as long as the Board approves it by the end of the month so Chris can file PREs report with the Court by September 1 (which the U.S. District Court Remedy requires). Karen From: Griffin, Beverly Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 5
05 PM To: Dejarnette, Karen Cc: Roberts, Olivine
Hattabaugh, Hugh
Brooks, Roy G Subject: RE: quarterly Karen
The cover sheet for the Quarterly Update is posted at the Novus site. That gives it a place on the action agenda for August. Per my phone discussion with Dr. Roberts, I will wait and post the actual report sometime prior to the meeting on the 24^. That gives everyone another week for reading, reviewing, revising. If any of the board members ask why its not posted, I will have to say that it was not complete prior to the agenda deadline of August 8^. From: Dejarnette, Karen Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 4:52 PM To: Griffin, Beverly Subject: quarterly Quarterly update enclosed 8/10/2006Margie Page 1 of 1 From: To: Sent: Attach: Subject: "DeJamette, Karen" <Karen.Dejarnette@lrsd.org> <mqpowell@odmemail.com> Thursday, August 24, 2006 1:45 PM updateSep06d.doc FW: Quarterly Report fyi From: Brenda Kampman [mailto:Brendak@fec.net] Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 1:37 PM To: Griffin, Beverly
Hattabaugh, Hugh
DeJamette, Karen
Roberts, Olivine
Brooks, Roy G Cc: Chris Heller Subject: Quarterly Report The attached Quarterly Report contains my most recent suggested changes. I am still in court though, and have not had a chance to make a final review. Chris Heller/bk Beverly: Please forward to Board Members. 8/24/2006(* Little Rock School Distric^^^g^gQ QUARTERLY UPDAW 1 'J to the OFFICE OF DESEGREGATIOM MOMITORUW Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM) and Joshua Intervenors September 1, 2006 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, PLAINTIFF K PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.l ETAL., DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ETAL., INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ETAL., INTERVENORS Planning, Research, and Evaluation Department (PRE) Instructional Resource Center (IRC) Little Rock School District 3001 South Pulaski Little Rock, AR 72206Introduction This is the eighth quarterly written update by the Little Rock School District (LRSD) and its Planning, Research, and Evaluation (PRE) Department, submitted in accordance with the U. S. District Courts 2004 Compliance Remedy (Memorandum Opinion of June 30, 2004, pp. 61-67). The organization of this report is that of the Compliance Remedy: 99 A. LRSD must promptly hire a highly trained team of professionals to reinvigorate PRE. B. The first task PRE must perform is to devise a comprehensive program assessment process which must be deeply embedded as a permanent part of LRSDs curriculum and instruction program. C. During each of the next two academic school years (2004-05 and 2005-06), LRSD must hire one or more outside consultants to prepare four (4) formal step 2 evaluations. D. PRE must (1) oversee the preparation of all eight of these step 2 evaluations
(2) work closely with Dr. Ross and any other outside consultants . . . and (3) provide the outside consultants with any and all requested assistance and support E. Evaluations will contain numbers and grade levels of teachers and administrators who contributed data, recommended program changes necessary for improved academic achievement by Afiican-American students, and brief explanations of how each change will increase a programs effectiveness. F. . . . PRE must notify the ODM and Joshua in writing of the names of those eight programs. In addition, after PRE and Dr. Ross have formulated a comprehensive program assessment process and reduced it to a final draft, PRE must provide a copy to the ODM and Joshua at least thirty days before it is presented to the Board for approval ... by December 31,2004. G. PRE must submit quarterly written updates on the status of the . . . four step 2 program evaluations . . . dining the 2004-05 school year and the four step 2 program evaluations that will be prepared during the 2005-06 school year... to ODM and Joshua on December 1, March 1, June 1, and September 1... H. [ODMs responsibilities.] L [Joshuas responsibilities.] J. Four step 2 program evaluations are due to the U. S. District Courts October 1,2005 and four more not later than October 1,2006. K. The Compliance Report is due October 15,2006. L. [This Compliance Remedy supersedes earlier one.] FINAL DRAFT Quaiteriy Written Update September 1,2006 Page 2 of 11Status as of September 1,2006 A. Hire a highly trained team of professionals. The Planning, Research, and Evaluation (PRE) Department, the highly trained professionals hired to carry out the Compliance Remedys requirements (first quarterly written update of December 1, 2000), sustains its duties diligently and now submits this eighth quarterly written update. Until the District hires a new test coordinator. Dr. Ed Williams of the PRE Department has filled that responsibihty in addition to his other duties. In June, the District posted a description of the position and invited applications. Interviews were arranged for August 14. The Department has continued to fimetion without a secretary or administrative assistant Services of additional persons for data collection, test administration, and other tasks have been arranged through contracts. B. Devise and embed a comprehensive program assessment process. The PRE Department will continue assessments of the programs which Drs. Catterall and Ross subjected to step 2 evaluations dining the past two years. Additional program assessments will commence up to the limits of PREs capacity. One of its limits is access to multiple types of data, which PRE has diligently worked to improve. C. Hire outside consuitant(s) to prepare eight formai step 2 evaluations. Step 2 evaluations of the last (2004-2005) school year PRE is endeavoring to carry on modified assessments of the four programs evaluated during the 2004-2005 school year, which will place the District in a very small number of districts in the nation which assess their programs with multiple measures. However, limited resources will prevent designs and conclusions as robust as in those evaluations. Step 2 evaluations during the current (2005-2006) school year Following are progress reports of the four evaluationsA+ (by Dr. James Catterall, UCLA) and 21 Century Community Learning Centers, Pre-K Literacy, and Read 180 (by Dr. Steve Ross, the University of Memphis Center for Research on Educational Policy (CREP)): A+ Dr. Catterall is completing his first assessment of the in-depth teacher surveys (ten pages of open response questions) and processing of classroom observations (90 pages of notes). Administering family interviews, he found 61 percent errors in verifying families telephone numbers. Dr. Catterall needs 2005-06 average attendance rates by school, average attendance rates by school and ethnicity, discipline referrals by school or by school and grade level, student short-term suspensions by school or by school and grade level, student long-term suspensions by school and grade level, and student expulsions by school and grade level. PRE is processing this data during August and sending it to Dr. Catterall. 27 Century Community Leamine Centers (2f CCLC) FINAL DRAFT Quarterly Written Update September 1,2006 Page 3 of 11CREP received completed instruments for teachers, parents, and students from all six 21** CCLC schools, and evaluators have interviewed all 21 CCLC site coordinators and principals. Three site observations at the case study school, Mabelvale Middle School, were conduct^ as well as the student focus group. Enrollment and attendance records have also been received from PRE. Scanning and analysis are underway of the following data which have been collected: o o o o o 187 teacher surveys, 82 parent surveys and 270 student surveys (50 elementary school, 140 middle school, and 80 high school), 12 staff interviews (6 site coordinators and 6 principals), 3 site observations, and one student focus group at the case study school, Mabelvale. Pre-K Literacy CREP mailed questionnaires to the 28 schools in the study and has collected the following: Parent Questionnaires (1,316): Pre-K Teacher Questiormaires (69): Pre-K Paraprofessional Questionnaires (69): K & 1 Grade Teacher Questionnaires: 686 64 58 144 In addition to the questionnaires, CREP also conducted: 10 phone interviews with randomly-selected principals 17 pre-k classroom observations using the E-LOT and the ELLCO Quantitative screening and achievement data forwarded by PRE to CREP included: DIBELS data arrived last quarter. TTBS (Iowa Test of Basic Skills) results were received last quarter and confirmed on July 3. ESI (Early Screening Inventory) data was received in June and revised in July. WSS (Work Sampling System) received in June Benchmark data: received in August The last quarterly written update, of June 2006, described PREs extraordinary efforts required for obtaining and editing data for the pre-K literacy evaluation. Pre-K teachers sent sheets from their students Early Screening Inventory (ESI) to PRE, which created an ESI data file. Since the ESI sheets had only students names but not their unique identification numbers, PRE sent its data file to the CISD for students numbers by matching student names and birth dates. Correcting errors in this data continued through most of July. PRE sent ESI data to CREP near the end of July. PRE supplied to CREP results of the Iowa Test of Basic Skills (TTBS) for students in kindergarten, first and second grades (obtained from NORMES) and later sent results from DIBELS (supplied by MGT) and Work Sampling (from Pearson Early Learning). While Riverside Publishing, the vendor, shipped printed individual students results of the Qualls Early Learning Inventory (QELI) to LRSD in fall 2005, neither Riverside nor NORMES could supply the data in electronic format NORMES had only data &om the previous year (2004), and Riverside did not maintain its data in a readily accessible fbnnat Officials there did not know if FINAL DRAFT Quarterly Written Update September 1,2006 Page 4 of 11D. PRE (1) oversees preparations of the step 2 evaluations, (2) works closely with Drs. Ross and Catterall, and (3) assists them. PRE continued close collaboration with the CREP team and Dr. Catterall in executing 2005-06 school years four step 2 evaluations. PRE convened teams for all four evaluations on May 31, and on July 11 the Pre-K literacy evaluation team met once again. Summaries of the sessions are in Appendix A. E. Evaluations will have (1) numbers and grade levels of teachers and administrators who submit data for evaluations, (2) recommended program changes necessary for improved achievement by African-American students, and (3) succinct explanations of how each change will increase its respective programs effectiveness. As it did during the first year of step 2 evaluations, PRE will remind the external evaluators of this requirement and assure their inclusion in evaluation reports. PRE will also include this information in reports of ongoing assessments. F. PRE will deliver names of programs to be evaluated and the comprehensive program assessment process to ODM and Joshua. Earlier quarterly written updates have reported that PRE notified both ODM and Joshua of all eight LRSD programs selected for step 2 evaluations and furnished both parties with the LRSD comprehensive program assessment process per F of the U. S. District Courts June 30, 2004 remedy (page 65). In addition, as has been previously reported, our comprehensive program assessment process has been approved. G. PRE must submit quarterly written updates on the status of step 2 evaluations. Per G of the June 30,2004 remedy by the U. S. District Court (page 65), PRE submitted its first written quarterly update on December 1, 2004, its second on March 1, 2005, its third by Jime 1, 2005, the fourth prior to September 1, 2005, the fifth by December 1, 2005, the sixth written quarterly update of March 1, 2006, and the seventh of June 1, 2006. PRE now submits this eighth written quarterly update prior to its due date of September 1,2006. Thus, to date, PRE has met all due dates of the remedy including the first annual report which the Court postponed from its original date of October 1,2005. FINAL DRAFT Quarterly Written Update September 1,2006 Page 6 of 11they could retrieve the required data at all. Negotiations over two months resulted in agreement by Riverside to process LRSD QELI data again and produce a computer-compatible data file. The estimated cost is $21,000 for the data from 2005 and a repetition of the process with the 2006 data. Riverside forecasted delivery in early September. READ 180 AU questionnaires were sent to the 10 participating schools, with receipt acknowledged (READ 180 Teacher Questionnaire, Non-READ 180 Teacher Questionnaire, READ 180 Student Questionnaire, and Parent Questionnaire). 10 schools have returned Non-READ 180 Teacher Questionnaires Total retumed= 265 8 schools have returned READ 180 Teacher Questionnaires Totalretumed=15 8 schools have returned Student Questionnaires Total retumed=754 8 schools have returned Parent Questionnaires Total retumed=165 AU 10 school observations have been completed Total observations=17 (each observation for one fuU 90 minute class) AU student focus groups have been completed Total student focus groups conducted=8 AU teacher focus groups have been completed Total teacher focus groups conducted=7 AU principal interviews have been completed Total principal interviews=10 Note: Parent surveys, student surveys, and Read 180 teacher surveys have not been received from Henderson and Parkview. AU scanning of instruments has been completed Quantitative and qualitative analyses are underway FINAL DRAFT Quarterly Written Update September 1, 2006 Page 5 of 11Appendix A Summaries of Evaluation Team Meetings PRE Department Little Rock School District May 31 and July 11,2006 A+ 21* Century Community Learning Centers Pre-Kindergarten Literacy Read180 FINAL DRAFT Quarterly Written Update September 1,2006 Page? of 11A+ Attending May 31 were Drs. DeJamette and Ed Williams (PRE)
external evaluator Dr. James Catterall (via mobile telephone from Kentucky)
Ms. Joy Springer (Joshua)
Mr. Gene Jones (ODM)
Ms. Maurecia Robinson and Jim Wohlleb (PRE) Dr. Catterall described progress as in the middle of the evaluationstudent (collected) & parent (nearly aU returned) surveys were administered. Next step, after these short-answer surveys, was a set of teacher surveys on line which his team was collecting at the time. Several that he reviewed indicated considerable depth. An interview with the art coordinator was also scheduled. Dr. Catterall arranged for specialists at UCLA to interview parents, and he scheduled classroom observations of A+ lessons for which Principal Janice Wilson was furnishing six to eight teachers on two days in the next week. She also commented on a protocol for these observations which he developed. Ms. Wilsons severe injuries in an automobile collision during the next month set back the evaluators if not the evaluation itself. The fear of late-arriving achievement test results, based on past experience, led to acceptance if necessary to use of earlier years data without the most recent test results. However, results of the current will allow comparison with earlier years and result in firmer conclusions. Dr. Catterall asked for more recent LRSD data from its portfolio. 21** Century Community Leamine Centers Attending May 31 were Drs. DeJamette and Ed Williams (PRE)
Drs. Heidi Kenaga, Jerry Bates, and Mr. Aaron McDonald (CREP, by phone)
Ms. Joy Springer & Mr. John Walker (Joshua)
Mr. Gene Jones (ODM)
and Jim Wohlleb (PRE). CREP evaluators reported Southwest Middle School completed data collection, i.e., teacher and parent surveys. Attendance at CCLC activities, like sign-in sheets, had not been received yet Students who participated in CCLC on a regular basis were surveyed. CREP stiU needed students unique identifying numbers to match records positively. PRE waited for access to school roster data from ADE. CREP observed classrooms at Mabelvale and held a focus group, in accordance with its evaluation plan. Focusing on one school will limit a foil description of the great variety among schools with respect to implementing CCLC. However, other available data will partially point out differences and account for inter-school differences. Pre-Kindemarten (pre-Ki Literacy Attending May 31 were 11 team members, who mcluded LRSD pre-K teachers and the District director, PRE Department members, evaluators fiom CREP, and representatives of Joshua Intervenors, and Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM): FINAL DRAFT Quarterly Written Update September 1, 2006 Page 8 of 11In the historical or longitudinal data, already furnished to CREP, CREP external evaluators asked during this team conference for dates of students entry into LRSD. CISD agreed to find this and in the next few days added it to the data file both the date and level of entry to the data file, which PRE then sent to CREP. In the Work Sampling results, CREP wanted dates of the teachers observations of their students. The publisher, Pearson, later in July explained the coding of dates in the data file, and PRE sent this documentation to CREP. Since QELI data was available only as printed student reports, rather than easily usable digitally formatted, discussion ensued about options. Because CREP considers it essential in the design, either discarding or replacing it with other data is not an option. The publisher. Riverside, had not responded about possibly supplying the data in a computer file. NORMES, the data warehouse for educational data at the University of Arkansas, from where PRE had assumed the data would conveniently come, announced inaccuracies involving 15,000 records but no date when corrected data would be available. Thus, the only option seemed to be creating a data file from the printed reports of individual students. Thus, there was agreement that requesting an extension of the due date for the report due to the U.S. District Court would be appropriate. In a letter to Dr DeJamette following this session, CREP director Dr. Steve Ross recommended such an extension and based the new date on a period of six to eight weeks for analyzing the data and writing the first draft Later in July, PRE downloaded QELI data from NORMES. This included only the categories delayed, developing, and developed for the six broad skill sets and no assessments for the many items within the six broad sets. For finer differences among students, CREP desired scores of the several items within each broad skill set. During June and July, PRE discussed with Riverside Publishing, the vendor for Qualls Early Learning Inventory (QELI or Qualls), the possibility of generating a computer-compatible data file from last falls QELI screening results. With the expectation of assessing literacy during die next school year, PRE introduced the notion for repeating the procedure then. At the end of July, PRE received an estimated cost of $21,110 for Riverside to create an application allowing a custom extract datafile from both 2005 and again this coming fall (2006). In a conference call on August 1 involving PRE, external evaluation team leader Dr. Grehan, and Riverside officials, they explored how much detail Riverside could retrieve. Further discussion the following day led to conversation between Riverside technical experts and Dr. Grehan. Whether PRE might obtain the same level of detailed information fiom NORMES was asked the next day by Dr. Williams. Read 180 Attending were Drs. DeJamette & Ed Williams (PRE)
Ms. Nona Whittaker and Ms. Karen Shofrier (teachers)
Drs. Dan Strahl and Molly Crocket and Mr. Aaron McDonald (CREP)
Ms. Joy Springer (Joshua)
Mr. Gene Jones (ODM)
and Jim Wohlleb (PRE). CREP reported virtual completion with its data collection-all surveys returned and 16 classrooms observed (per evaluation design). CREP calculated return rates of 68 percent for students, 19 percent for parents surveys, and 95 percent for teachers, respectively. Only time-on-task by ethnic group and school were missing. Whether this was available was not certain. FINAL DRAFT Quarterly Written Update September 1,2006 Page 10 of 11Mr. Jim Wohlleb, Team Leader Ms. Krista Underwood, Early Childhood Literacy Specialist Dr. Ed Williams, Statistician Dr. Anna Grehan, External Evaluator (CREP) Dr. Freddie Peyton, External Evaluator (CREP) Dr. Karen DeJamette, PRE Reviewer Ms. Maurecia Robinson, PRE Reviewer Ms. Sheneka Alexander, Teacher (Baseline) Ms. Angela Doyne, Teacher (Geyer Spring) Mr. Gene Jones, ODM Ms. Joy Springer, Joshua Intervenors CREP reported completion of surveys among kindergarten and first-grade teachers (64 percent response rate) and among parents (greater than 50 percent returned). Promotion of the evduation by the Early Childhood Department may have improved teachers responsiveness: The director had distributed copies of the evaluation plan to teachers and explained the evaluation to them. On the other hand, perhaps the several requests for information dampened parents responsiveness to CREPs questionnaires: Parents responded to requests by the state Division of Child Care, and in many schools from the State ABC Evaluation, in addition to their completion of lengthy forms for their childrens enrollment. CREP also reported interviews often principals as planned. The two teachers attending this meeting were not observed, and other teachers did not report then- experiences with CREP observers. Administrators described some contusion by teachers, whom evaluators from ADE visited during the same period, about who observed them. CREP reported pleasant, uneventful observations in the classrooms. In light of the delays in obtaining data for this evaluation, PRE convened another session of the pre-K literacy evaluation team on July 11. Participants included LRSD senior administrators, CISD, and LRSD preschool education experts in addition to PRE and CREP. The new director of early childhood education for LRSD, Ms. Glenda Nugent, assumed the role of specialist on the team, succeeding Ms. Krista Underwood who retired this year. Those attending were: Mr. Jim Wohlleb (PRE), Team Leader Ms. Glenda Nugent, (LRSD Early Childhood Director), Specialist Ms. Pat Busbea (LRSD Reading First consultant) Dr. Ed Williams (PRE), Statistician Dr. Debbi Slawson (CREP), External Evaluator Dr. Lynn Harrison (CREP), External Evaluator Dr. John Nunnery (consultant to CREP), Statistician Dr. Karen DeJamette, PRE Reviewer Ms. Maurecia Robinson, PRE Reviewer Ms. Nancy Morgan, Mr. Kevin Crawford, and Mr. Chris Cole (CIS) Mr. Hugh Hattabaugh (LRSD Deputy Superintendent) Dr. Olivine Roberts (LRSD Associate Superintendent) Mr. Gene Jones and Ms. Marjorie Powell, ODM Mr. John Walker and Ms. Joy Springer, Joshua Intervenors FINAL DRAFT Quarterly Written Update September 1, 2006 Page 9 of 11IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1,ETAL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS LRSDS NOTICE OF FILING QUARTERLY UPDATE The Little Rock School District ("LRSD) for its Notice of Filing Quarterly Update dated September 1,2006 states: 1. The attached document is the eighth quarterly written update by the Little Rock School District and its Planning, Research, and Evaluation Department. It has been provided to the Joshua Intervenors and the Office of Desegregation Monitoring in accordance with the District Courts 2004 Compliance Remedy (Memorandum Opinion of June 30,2004). 2. LRSD is filing this Quarterly Update so that the Court may be aware of the compliance work done by LRSD to comply with the Courts Memorandum Opinion of June 30,2004. 1Another task then was to identify ReadlSO students for comparison of achievement scores. An issue of student mobility arose which would mean some students moved into and out of ReadlSO. PRE would query teachers about this. Missing surveys from Southwest, which PRE mailed to PRE, have not been found. Parkviews and Hendersons surveys were in the mail to PRE at the time. One observer followed a schedule devised by a teacher to see several classes and to meet with teachers. The observer sent questions in advance. The other observer arrived unannounced, observed students on computers, but communicated little with the teacher in the classroom. Discussion included some drawbacks of the program: Teachers dont select students. Rather, eighth-grade ACTAAP scores are supposed to determine students participation
but there are errors, and teachers do not have access to scores. Teachers at other schools selected some students. FINAL DRAFT Quarterty Written Update September 1, 2006 Page 11 of 11WHEREFORE, the LRSD submits its Quarterly Update as required by the Court. Respectfully Submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Friday, Eldredge & Clark Christopher Heller (#81083) 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 (501) 376-2011 Zs/ Christopher Heller CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on September 1,2006,1 have electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which shall send notification of such filing to the following: mark.hagemeier@ag.state.ar.us si ones@mwsgw.com siones@ili.com iohnwalkerattv@aol.com and mailed by U.S. regular mail to the following addresses: Gene Jones Office of Desegregation Monitor 1 Union National Plaza 124 W. Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 2Mr, Clayton Blackstock Mr. Mark Burnett 1010 W. Third Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Judge J. Thomas Ray U. S. District Courthouse 600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 149 Little Rock, AR 72201 Zs/ Christopher Heller 3C. D. E, G. H. Linle Rock District FORM NO. FAPO-38 77-01 LEA Number 10.'17/95 Quarter Ending Date 11/10/95 Date Sobtnitted M to M TRANSFERS 1 Quarter Number SUPERINTENDENTS QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT, GRADES K-12 ADT - ADA - ADM Thic rqtnrt Ia dug within fifteen (15) days after tfoe cod of the quarter( Ark. Code Aon. 6-18-213, Sapp. 1991). Said one copy to tbe office of ijyal Fiscal Servy=. M Capito] MaU, Room 202-A, Little Rode, Arkansas 72201 and one copy to tbe County Board of Education. Each quarter is to be no less dian fony (40) and no more than fifty (50) days. I 2 3 I 4 5 KINDERGARTEN DAYS IN ATTENDANCE DAYS ADM Figures in columns 2 thru 14 should be to the nearest whole number Resident pupils sent to other (fist(s) under *M to M transfers List Districts LEA NO. Pulaski County Pulaski County P4 North Little Rock Total C of columns 12, 13, 14. These will be used for MFP/Transp. Aid purposes Non-resident pupils received from other district(s) under 'M to M' transfers. List Districts LEA NO. Pulaski County North Little Rock Pulaski County - P4 Total E I 8 I 9 GRADES 1-12 DAYS IN ATTENDANCE 10 DAYS !\rriSnJeJ SuperilUeildeitf'S ^ignafnm 1995-96 Year Phone si 124-2272 11 12 13 COMBINED TOTAL C3<ADESK-12 14 DAYS IN QTR. NT* TOTAL COL. 2+3 ABSENT* TOTAL + NT T TOTAL COL 4+5 /COL 1 TOTAL ABSENT TOTAL TOTAL T+NI COL. 9+10 /ax. ADT COL. 2 + 7 /COL ADA COL 4 + 9 /COL T NT COLUMNS 7+8 1 AlXf COL 4+5+ 9*10OL1 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 Number of kindergarten pupils enrolled this quarter: 4451 2425 1327 78 1609 1405 50 Full-time
4451 2425 1327 78 1609 1405 192 113 20 2 61 22 Half-time: 116 64 34 2 42 36 39220 7422 11534 2420 13954 Additional instructions on back. 39220 7422 11534 2420 13954 2124 393 426 104- 530 FIN-09-00-005 5/91 1034 195 299 63 362 W/P4 1092 186 1,277 1092 186 1,277 322 62 40 424 1150 195 1,345 333 65 42 440B. A1. c. Pulaski County FOR.y NO. FAPD-3 BI3I32 Read carefully irtstjuctkxts on Page 2 Little Rock Distria 60-01 LEA Number 10/17/95 Qaaner Ending Date 11/10/95 Date Sabmitted SUPERINTENDENT'S QUARTERLY ATTENTJANCE REPORT, GRADES K-12 ADT - ADA - ADM This report is ihie (IS) dajs afisibeead oftbe qaarterf Ark. Code Aim. ^lg-213. Snpp. 1991). Send one c^ry to the office of Local Fiscal Services, 44 Ca|^ Mn, Koom 202-.A, Litde Rock, Arkansas 72201 and one copy to the County Board of Ednearion, Each quarter is to be no less dan forty (40) and no more dan fifty (50) davs. I I I 5 I 6 I g I 10 KINDERGARTEN DAYS IN ATTENDANCE DAYS ADM GRADES 1 -12 DAYS IN ATTENDANCE DAYS Figures in columns 2 thru 14 should be to the nearest whole number Resident pupis atterxfing schools in this distnct Resident pupMs sent to PreK Sp. Ed. (non-puMc) schools urxler a tuition agreement Alternative Learning Envirorvnent List So. Ed.Schoote bv naoM EBzabeth Mitchell Day Treatment Florence Crittenton Home Service Arkansas State Hospital Resident pupils sent to other dist<s) under tuition agreement Cl. Alternative Learning Environmem List Distrlets I LEA NO. D. E. El. G. H. T Total A. 6, C of columns 12. 13, 14. These wiD be used for MFPZTransp. Aid purposes Norwesident pupils received from other distnctfsl under a tuition agreement list Districts LEA NO. Alternative Learning Envirorvnent Non-resident pupils received under *Pnv. Tuit.* &/or No Tuit. being paid* Total (A, B. E and F) 1 Quarter Nanba 1995-96 Year II 12 DAYS IN QTR. 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 Number of kirxtergarten students erwolled this quarter
NP TOTAL COL 2 + 3 ABSENT* TOTAL + NT T TOTAL COL.4 + 5 /COL. 1 TOTAL TOTAL ABSENT T+NT < TOTAL CCM~9+10 AXIL. NT COLUMNS 7+g 10,901 57,745 68,646 2784 1786 318,505 370,131 .. 688,636 42,083 18,268 IMPORTANT: See oou on Reverse Side. FaU-Qme 20g4 Half-dme: 889 746 660 889 746 660 *See Psge 2 Kindergancn Instnictioas 117 12 20 25 19 17 Supenflieodents Sigoarore Phone# 224^22 I 13 I 14 COMBINED TOTAL ADT COL. 2 + 7 /COL 8,235 22 19 17 8,293 8,293 GRADES K-12 COL 4 + 9 /COL ADM COL. 4+5+9+10 /<X)L 1 18,932 20,054 22 19 17 18,990 18,990 25 19 17 20,115 20,115 (O*r) Link Rock District 77-01 LEA Number 10/17/95 Quarter Ending Date 11/10/95 Date Submitted 1 Quarter Nomber FORM NO. FAPO-3B M to M TRANSFERS SUPERINTENDENT'S QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT, GRADES K-12 1995-96 Year Phone# 2242222 ADT - ADA - ADM This report is (fate mtfain fifteen (15) days after dte end of die quarter (Ark. Code Ano. 6-18-213, Supp. 1991). Send one copy to the office of Local Fiscal Services, Capitol Mall. Room 202-A, Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 and one copy to the County Board of Educafion. Each quarter is to be no less (han forty (40) and no mote than fifty (50) days. I 2 I 3 I 5 I 6 I 8 I 9 10 11 12 I 13 I 14 KINDERGARTEN DAYS IN ATTENDANCE DAYS ADM C. D. E. G. H. GRADES 1-12 DAYS IN ATTENDANCE DAYS COMBINED TOTAL QlADESK-12 Rgures in columns 2 thru 14 shotdd be to tfie r>earest whole rwmber Resident pt^xls sent to other cfistls) under "M to M* transfers List Districts LEA NO. Pulaski County Pulaski County P4 North Little Rock Total C of columns 12. 13, 14. These will be used for MFP/Transp. Aid purposes Non-resident pupils received from other districtCs) under *M to M' transfers. List Districts LEA NO. Pulaski County North Little Rock Pulaski County - P4 Total E DAYS IN QTR. NT* TOTAL COL. 2+3 ABSENT* TOTAL + NT T TOTAL COL. 4+5 /COL. 1 TOTAL ABSENT TOTAL T+NT TOTAL COL. 9 +10 /COL. ADT COL. 2 + 7 /COL. ADA COL. 4 + 9 /COL, T NT COLUMNS 7+8 1 1 1 ADM COL. 4+5+ 9+lO/COL. 1 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 Number of kindergarten pupils enrolled this quarter: 50 1327 78 1609 1405 Full-time
7422 7422 393 195 186 186 195 1327 78 1609 1405 20 2 61 22 Half-time
34 2 42 36 11534 2420 13954 Additional instnictions on back. 11534 2420 13954 426 104' 530 FIN-09-00-005 5/91 299 63 362 W/P4 322 62 40 424 333 65 42 440 Little Rock District 76-01 LEANumber 10/17/95 Quarter Ending Date 11/10/95 Date Submitted 1 Quarter Nnmbff FORM NO. FAPD-3A MAGNET SCHOOL REPORT SUPERINTENDENTS QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT, GRADES K-12 ADT - ADA - ADM This report is due witfun fifteen (15)da>'s after the end of the quarter ( Ark. Code Ann. 6-18-213, Supp. 1991). Send one copy to the office of Local Fiscal Services, #4 Capitol Mall, Room 202-A Littfe Rock, Arkansas 72201 and one copy to the Ounty Board of Education. Each quarter is 1995-96 School Year Phone# 224:2222 to be 00 less than forty (40) and no more than fifty (50) da^'S- 2 3 4 5 6 7 I 8 I 9 to 11 12 13 14 This is to report information on the students attending magnet schools. DAYS IN ATTENDANCE DAYS ADM DAYS IN ATTENDANCE DAYS ADM COMBINED TOTAL GRADES K - 12 C. Little Rock (76-01) sent to Little Rock (76-01) Total K-12 C. N. Little Rock 176-02) sent to Little Rock (76-01) Total K-12 C. Pulaski County Special (76-03) sent to Little Rock (76-01) Total K-12 Total to be used in Funding Magnet School ___________________ DAYS IN QTR. NT* [TOTAL COL 2+3 KINDERGARTEN 40 40 40 40 Number of kindergarten pupils enrolled this quarter: 1,258 5,051 6,309 KINDERGARTEN 0 0 1,258 1,026 1,026 KINDERGARTEN 2,128 2,128 8,205 9,463 Full-time
2S2 ABSENT* TOTAL + NT T TOTAL COL. 4+5 /COL. 1 ABSENT TOTAL T NT Total Cd.7^8 TOTAL T+NI COL. 9+10 /COL. ADT COL. 2 + 7 /COL. ADA COL. 4+9 /COL. 1 1 1 ADM COL. 4+5+ 9+lO/COL. 1 GRADES 1-6 206 163 14 32 252 Half-time: 26 54 243 31,230 25,734 56,964 0 0 0 0 0 56,964 8,504 39,734 1,044 GRADES 7-12 14,951 40,685 1,643 23,455 80,419 2,687 2,078 1456 2168 2241 GRADES 1-6 11,095 11,095 362 GRADES 7-12 6,482 6,482 286 17,577 17,577 648 456 0 465 482 GRADES 1-6 18,412 18,412 433 GRADES 7-12 16,777 16.777 668 35,189 35,189 1,101 907 0 933 961 76,221 133,185 4.436 3,441 1,456 3,566 3,684 Additional instructions are on the back Little Rock District 26:01 LEANwnbo' 12/19/95 Quarter Eodiog Date 1/16/96 Dae Submitted 1 Quarter Number FORM NO. FAPD-3A MAGNET SCHOOL REPORT SUPERINTENDENT'S QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT, GRADES K-12 ADT - ADA - ADM This report is (fae within fifteen (IS) days afUr tbe end of die quarter (Art Code Ann. 6-18-213, Supp. 1991). Send one copy to die office <rf Loci Fised Services. #4 C^xtol Mali, Room 202-A, Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 and one copy to tbe Cooaly Board of Ethjcatioo. EacbquartCTis \9i5-9(, School Year Fbcoe# sl^UTl to be no less than forT>' (40) and no more fifty (50) days. 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 I 13 14 This is to report information on the students attending magnet schoots. DAYS IN ATTENDANCE DAYS ADM DAYS IN ATTENDANCE DAYS ADM COMBINED TOTAL OADES K. -12 C. Little Rock (76-01) sent to Little Rock (76-01) Total K-12 C. N. Little Rock (76-02) sent to Little Rock (76-01) Total K-12 C. Pulaski County Special (76-03) sent to Little Rock (76-01) Total K-12 Total to be used in Funding Magnet School ______________________ DAYS IN QIR. NT* I TOTAL COL 2+3 KINDERGARTEN 40 1,281 4,866 6,147 KINDERGARTEN 40 40 40 Number of kindergarten pupils enrolled this quarter
0 0 1,281 944 944 KINDERGARTEN 1,958 7,768 Full-time: 1,958 9,049 252 ABSENT* TOTAL + NT T TOTAL C<M>.4+5 /CM-.I ABSENT T NT Total Col.7+8 TOTAL T+NT TOTAL COL. 9+10 lOOL. ADT COL 2 + 7 /COL ADA COL 4 + 9 ZCOL GRADES 1-6 1 1 ADM COL. 4+5+ ^KVCOL-I 381 163 46 25 130 557 Half-time: 52 240 30,785 25,288 56,073 0 0 0 0 0 56,073 8,291 39,076 1,810 GRADES 7-12 14,609 22,900 GRADES 1-S 10,909 GRADES 7-12 6,253 17,162 GRADES 1-6 17,734 GRADES 7-12 16,359 34,093 74,155 39,897 78,973 10,909 6,253 17,162 17,734 16,359 34,093 130,228 Additional instructiOQS are on the back. 2,420 4,230 2,080 I 1434 2128 2243 549 394 943 886 1,099 1,985 7,158 453 902 3,435 I 0 0 1,434 453 477 901 3,482 954 3,674B. Al. c. Pulaski County FORM NO. FAPO-3 &I3I32 Read carefuOy instructions on Page 2 Little Rock District 6(M)1 LEA Number 12/19/95 Qoatter Eoding Date 1/16/96 Date Submitted SUPERINTENDE.NTS QUARTERLY ATTENDAiNCE REPORT, GRADES K-12 ADT - ADA - ADM Tti rfpirticA^wiihm fifteen (15) dsyssfter die end <rfthe qBaittr( Alt. Code Ana. 6-18-213. Snpp. 1991). Send one copy to the office of Local Fiscal Services. #4 Capiul MaO, Room 202-A. Lode Rock, .Arkansas 72201 ad aoe copy to the County Board of Education Eadi quarttr is to be no less than faty (40) and no more tian (50) <fa>-5. I I 5 I 7 I I 9 I 10 KINDERGARTEN DAYS IN ATTENDANCE DAYS ADM GRADES 1-12 DAYS IN ATTENDANCE DAYS 2 Qaner Nanber I 1995-96 Year 11 12 Supermteadcpfs Signature pbce# 13 I 14 COMBINED TOTAL GRADES K-12 Figures in columns 2 thru 14 should be to the nearest whole rumber Resident pupils atterxfing schools in this district Resident pupib sent to PreK Sp. Ed. (nor> pubBcl schools imder a tuition agreement Aftemative Learning Environment List So. Ed, Schools bv name Elizabeth Mitchell Day Treatment FlorerKe Crittenton Home Service Arkansas State Hospital/OHS Resident pupils sent to other dist{s) under tuition agreement C1. Alternative Learning Environment Ust Districts I LEA NO. 0. Total A, B. C of columns 12, 13, 14, These win be used for MFPZTransp. Aid purposes 6. Non-resident pupds received from other districKs) under a tuition agreement List Districts LEA NO. EL Alternative Learning Environment Non-resident pupils received urxler 'Pnv. Turt.* &/or No Tuit. being paid" G. Total |A, B, and F) H. DAYS IN QTR. 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 Number of kindergarten students enrolled this quarter
NT* TOTAL COL 2 + 3 ABSENT TOT.AL + NT T TOTAL COL.4 + 5 /COL. 1 TOTAL TOTAL ABSENT T+NT i TOTAL (XX-9+10 /Ctt-. ADT CCX- 2 + 7 /COL ADA (XL 4 + 9 /(XL NT COLUMNS 7+8 ADM COL 4+5+9+10 /COL 1 13,120 54,131 67351 4761 1800 320,581 342,751 663332 62,239 18,139 8,343 18,265 19.940 IMPORTANT: See nou on Revene Sde. Full-time: 1869 Half-time. 885 863 640 885 863 640 *See Page 2 Kinderganeo Instnictiotu 17 12 11 15 16 11 22 16 8,403 8,403 22 16 18,325 18,325 23 22 16 20,001 20,001 (Over) C. D. E. e. H. LitlleRock District FORM NO. FAPO-3B 77-01 LEA Num ba 12/19/95 Quota EtMfing Date 1/16/96 Dmc Submitted M to M TRANSFERS 2 Quarter Nomber SUPERIOTENDENTS QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT, GRADES K-12 ADT - ADA - ADM This report is <be UTthin fifteeo (15) days after the aid of (be quarter ( Ark. Code Ann. 6-18-213, Supp. 1991). Send one copy to die office of Local Fiscal Ser^-ices, #4 Capitol Mall, Room 202-A, Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 and ooe copy to the County Board of Eibcatioa. Each quarter is to be no less that fbrTv (40) and no more than fifty (SO) days. I 2 I 3 5 6 KINDERGARTEN DAYS IN ATTENDANCE DAYS ADM 1995-96 Year SnperiDteodents Signature Phone# 224:2222 Figures in columns 2 thru 14 should be to the nearest whole nomber Resident pupils sent to other distlsl unrjer 'M to M' transfers List Districts LEA NO. Pulaski County Pulaski County P4 North Little Rock Total C of columns 12, 13, 14, These will be used for MFP/Transp. Aid purposes Non-resident pupils received from other distrtctls) under "M to M' transfers. List Districts LEA NO. Pulaski County North Lttle Rock Pulaski County - P4 Total E I 8 I 9 10 I 11 12 13 GRADES 1-12 DAYS IN ATTENDANCE DAYS I COMBINED TOTAL C31ADESK-I2 14 DAYS IN QTR. NT* TOTAL COL 2+3 ABSENT* TOTAL + NT T TOTAL COL. 4+5 /COL. I TOTAL ABSENT TOTAL TOTAL T+NT COL. 9+10 ."COL. ADT COL 2 + 7 /COL ADA COL 4 + 9 /COL NT COLUMNS 7+8 1 1 1 ADM COL. 4+5+ 9+IO/COL. 1 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 Number of kindergarten pupils enrolled this quarter
1276 76 1461 1352 Ftillaiitic: 7278 7278 441 193 182 182 182 182 193 193 1276 76 1461 1352 2i 31 4 110 35 llalf-ttme 33 2 39 35 11044 2437 13481 Additional instnictions on back 11044 2437 13481 530 289 308 322 181' 711 FINTBTKWXIS 5(91 65 63 37 354 408 W/P4 67 39 428C. D. E. G. H. Lillie Rock District FORM NO. FAPO-3B Agures in columns 2 thru 14 should be to the nearest whole number Resident pupils sent to other tfistls) under "M to M' transfers List Districts LEA NO. Pulaski County Pulaski County P4 North Litde Rock Total C of columns 12, 13, 14, These will be used for MFPZTransp. Aid purposes Non-resident pupils received from other districtlsl under 'M to M' transfers. List Districts LEA NO. Pulaski County North Little Rock Pulaski County - P4 Total E 77-01 LEA Number 12/19/95 Quaner Eodii^ Date 1,'16,'96 Date Submitted M to -M TRANSFERS Quarter Number SUPERINTENDErfTS QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT, GRADES K-12 ADT - ADA - ADM This report is due nilliin fifteen (15) dass after tbe end of the epiarter (Art. Code .Ann. 6-18-213, Supp. 1991L Send one copy to the ofScc of Local Fiscal Services, fr4 Capitol MalL Room 202-A, Little Rock. ,Artansas 72201 am] one copy to the County Board of Education. Each quarter is to be DO less than forty (40) and oo more than fifty (50) days. I 2 I 3 I 5 6 1 KINDERGARTEN DAYS IN ATTENDANCE DAYS ADM I S GRADES 1-12 DAYS IN ATTENDANCE 10 DAYS DAYS IN QTR. NT* TOTAL COL 2+3 ABSENT* TOTAL ' + NT T TOTAL COL. 4-t5 fCOL. 1 TOTAL ABSENT TOTAL COLUMNS 7-^8 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 Number of kindergarten pupils enrolled this quarter: 4036 2468 1276 76 1461 1352 Full-time: 4036 2468 1276 76 1461 1352 S5 304 212 31 4 110 35 Half-time: 109 67 33 2 39 35 38956 7278 11044 2437 13481 Additiofial instruction, on back 38956 7278 11044 2437 13481 1995-96 Year 11 12 TOTAL T+NT COL 9 *10 /COL 1 Siqjcriiitendeois Siznatm I 2995 441 530 181 711 FTN4I4OO00S 5/01 1049 193 289 65 354 i A-zy-n Phrme# 324-2272 13 I 14 COMBINED TOTAL ADT COL 2 + 7 COL, 1 1075 182 1,257 GRADES K-12 AD.A COL. 4 + 9 ZCOL ADM COL 4+5+ 9*10iCOL. I W/P4 1075 182 1,257 308 63 37 408 1157 193 1,350 322 67 39 428B. Al. c. Pulaski________ County FORM NG. FAPO-3 &13I32 Read carehilly instructions on Page 2 Little Rock District 60-01 LEA Number 3/13/96 Quarter Ending Date 4/8/96 Dale Subotined 2 Quarter Number Sapeniead^s S^oaUBe SUPERINTENDENTS QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT, GRADES K-12 ADT - ADA - ADM This report is due w-ithin fifteen (15) days alter the end of the quarter (Ark. Code Arm. 6-18-213, Supp. 1991). Send one copy to the office of L.ocal Fiscal Services. #4 Capitol MalL Room 202-A Little Rock. Arkansas 72201 and one copy to (fae County Board of Education. Esch quarter is to be no less than forty (40) and no more (han fifty (50) days. I I 3 I I 5 I 6 I 8 I 9 I 10 I KINDERGARTEN DAYS IN ATTENDANCE DAYS ADM 1995-96 Year Pbooeo 324-2272 II 12 13 14 GRADES 1-12 DAYS IN ATTENDANCE DAYS COSffiPs'ED TOTAL GR.ADES K -12 Figures in columrrs 2 thru 14 should be to the nearest whole number Resident pupils attending schools in this district Resident pupils sent to PreK Sp. Ed. (non- pubiic) schools under a tuition agreement Alternative Learning Environment List So, Ed. Sctwwb bv name Elizabeth MrtcneU Day Treatment Florence Crittemon Home Service Arkansas State Hosprtal/DHS Resident pupils sent to other dist(s) urrder tuition agreement C1. Attematjve Leaning Environment List Districts LEA NO. D. Total A. 8. C of columns 12. 13. 14. These win be used for MFP/Transp. Aid purposes E. Non-resident pupils received from other districttsl UTKter a tuition agreement List Districts LEA NO. I El. Alternative Leammg Environment F. Non-resident pupils received imder "Priv. Tuit." &/or No Tuit. being paid* G. Total (A, 8. arxJ F) H. IN QTR. 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 Number of kindergarten students enrolled ttus quarter: T* 17,012 NT* 66,021 TOTAL COL. 2 + 3 ABSENT* TOTAL NT TOTAL COL. 4+ 5 /COL. 1 TOTAL TOTAL ABSENT TOTAL T+NT COL. 9 +10 /COL. ADT COL. 2 + 7 KXL. COL. 4 + 9 KOL. NT COLUMNS 7+8 ADM COL. 4+5+9t10 /CXX. I 83,033 5596 1809 388,646 414,398 803,044 82,827 18,079 8,279 18,083 19,888 IMPORTANT: Sec note on Reverse Side. FBU.time: 1896 Half-time: 1,421 1,862 392 1,421 1,862 392 'See Page 2 Kiodergarten Instructions 361 747 36 53 8 29 38 8 8,354 8,354 29 38 8 18,158 18,158 36 53 8 19,985 19,985 <Owr)C. D. E. G. H. Lillie Rock District FORM FJO. FAP0-3B Figures in columns 2 thru 14 should be to the nearest whole number Resident pupds sent to other dist(s) under "M to M* transfers Lbt Districts LEA NO. Pulaski County Pulaski County P4 North Little Rock Total C of cotumns 12,13. 14. These will be used for MFP/Transp. Aid purposes Non-resident pupte received from other district(s) under 'M to M transfers. List Districts LEA NO. Pulaski County North Little Rock Pulaski County - P4 Total E 77-01 LEA Number 3/13/96 Quarter Ending Dale 4/8/96 Date Submitted M to M TRANSFERS 2 Quarter Number SUPERINTENDENTS QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT, GRADES K-12 ADT - ADA - ADM This report is due within fifteen (15) days after the end of the quarter ( Ark. Code Ann. 6-18-213. Supp. 1991). Send one copy to ihc office of Local Fiscal Services, Hi Capitol Mall. Room 202-A. Little Rock. Arkansas 72201 and one copy Io the County Board of Education. Each quarter is to be no less than forty (40) and no more than fifty (50) days I 3 KINDERGARTEN DAYS IN ATTENDANCE I 5 I 6 I 8 GRADES 1-12 10 I DAYS ADM DAYS IN ATTENDANCE DAYS DAYS IN QTR. NT* TOTAL COL. 2+3 ABSENT* TOTAL + NT T TOTAL COL. 4+5 /COL. I TOTAL ABSENT TOTAL T NT COLUMNS 7+8 49 49 48 49 48 49 49 Number of kindergarten pupfts enrolled this quarter: 4896 3060 1516 93 1739 1609 FuU-timr 4896 3060 1516 93 1739 1609 325 224 52 5 112 57 Half-tiioe: 107 67 32 2 38 34 46295 46295 8430 8430 13080 2863 15943 AdditMoal instracoaos on back. 13080 2863 15943 Superimeniieni's Signature 1995-96 Year TOTAL T+NT COL, 9+10 /COL. 1 12 I Phone 324-2272 13 I COMBINED TOTAL ADT COL. 2 + 7 /COL. 1 14 GR.ADESK-12 ADA COL. 4 + 9 /COL. ADM COL. 4+5+ 9+lO/COL. 1 3928 1025 1045 1045 1132 599 797 204 1001 FIN-09-)-005 5/91 188 176 1,220 176 1,220 188 1,320 283 64 347 W/P4 298 62 35 395 315 66 38 419Little Rock District 76-01 LEA Number 3/13/96 Quarter Ending Date 4/8/96 Date Submitted i Quarter Number Supennlendents Signature FORM NO. FAPD-3A MAGNET SCHOOL REPORT SUPERINTENDENT'S QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT, GRADES K-12 1995-96 School Year i Phones 324-22?
This is to report information on the students attending magnet schools. C. Little Rock (76-01) sent to Little Rock (76-01) Total K-12 C. N. Uttle Rock (76-02) sent to Uttle Rock (76-01) Total K-12 C. Pulaski County Special (76-03) sent to Uttle Rock (76-01) Total K-12 Total to be used in Funding Magnet School ADT - ADA - ADM This report is due within fifteen (15) days after the end of the quarter ( Ark. Code Atm. 6-18-213, Supp. 1991). Send one copy to the office of Local Fiscal Services, M Capitol Mall, Room 202-A, Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 and one copy to the County Board of Education. Each quarter is to be no less than forty (40) and no more than fifty (50) days. 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 I 9 10 II 12 13 14 DAYS IN ATTENDANCE DAYS ADM DAYS IN ATTENDANCE DAYS ADM COMBINED TOTAL GRADES K -12 DAYS IN QTR. NT* Itotal col. 2+3 KINDERGARTEN Number of kindergarten pupils enrolled this quarter
49 49 49 49 1,736 6,096 KINDERGARTEN 0 0 1,736 1,239 KINDERGARTEN 2,358 9,693 Full-time
7,832 1,239 2,358 11,429 250 ABSENT* TOTAL + NT T TOTAL COL. 4+5 /COL. I ABSENT T NT Total Col.7+8 TOTAL T+NT TOTAL COL. 9+10 /COL. ADT ADA COL. 2 + 7 ZCOL. COL. 4 9 /COL. I 1 ADM COL. 4*5- 9+lO/COL. 1 GRADES 1-6 443 169 35 26 116 594 Half-time: 50 245 38,721 10,081 48,802 1,854 GRADES 7-12 25,423 64,144 0 0 0 0 0 64,144 17,157 27,238 GRADES 1-6 13,353 GRADES 7-12 7,392 20,745 GRADES 1-6 21,962 GRADES 7-12 19,363 41,325 89,308 42,580 91,382 13,353 7,392 20,745 21,962 19,363 41,325 153,452 .Additional instructions arc on the badL 3,142 4,996 1,967 1344 2025 2136 631 630 1,261 449 0 449 475 815 1,510 2,325 8,582 891 0 891 941 3,307 1,344 3,365 3,552B. A1. c. Pulaski County FORM NO. FAPO-3 SI3I32 Read carefully instructions on Page 2 Little Rock Distrkt 60-01 LEA Number 6/3/96 Qusner Fading Dale 6/17/96 Daw Siibnined SVPERINTENDENTS QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT, GRADES K-12 ADT - ADA - ADM This report is due w ilbin fiflecedS) davs after the end of the quarter f Ark Code Am. 6>lt-2l3. Supp 1991). Send one copy to ihe ofTiceof LecaJ Fiscal Services. M Capitol MaU. Rooa 3O2-.K. Litde Rock. Arkansas 72201 and one copy to ihe County Board of Education. Each quarter is to be no less than forts-140) tai tta move than fifh 150) das-s I 2 I I I 5 i 6 I I 10 I KINDERGARTEN DAYS IN ATTENDANCE DAYS ADM GRADES 1-12 DAYS ATTENDANCE DAYS Figures in cokanns 2 thru 14 should be to the nearest whole number Resident pupils anerxiing schools in this district Resident pupils sem to PreK Sp. Ed. (rxxv pubticl schools under a tuition sgreement Anemative Learning Environment List So. Ed, Schoois bv name Elizabeth MitcheU Day Treatment Florence Cnttenton Home Service Arkansas State Hospital/OHS Resident pupils sent to other distlsl under tuition agreement Cl. ARematrve LeamneEflwonoient List DiMricts LEA NO. D. Total A. B, C of columns 12, 13, 14. These wifl be used for MFP/Transp. Aid purposes Norvrestdent pupds received from other <fethct{s) under a tuition agreement List Districts : LEA NO. I El. Attemative Learrang Enwonment Non-resident pupils received urvler Priv. Tuit. &?or *No Tuit. being paid* G. Total (A, B. E and F) H. 4 Quarter Nianber 1222:SS Yew 12 I Supmntendent s 'j/yC nature Phone* J24:i222 13 I 14 COMBINED TOTAL GRADES K> 12 DAYS IN QTR. 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 7T 49 49 49 49 Nurrtber of kindergarten students ervoAed this Quarter TOTAL COL 2*3 ABSENT TOTAL NT T TOTAL COL.4 + 5 /COL I TOTAL TOTAL ABSENT TOTAL T-NT COL 9 *10 ZCOL ADT COL. 2*7 /COL. KQK COL 4*9 /COL. NT COLLMNS T-t ADM COL. 4+5+9*10 /COL. t 18,094 64,703 82,797 5952 1811 386,713 404,661 791,374 87,351 17,933 8,261 17,840 19,744 IMPORTANT: See att en Rcvcnc Side. FaB-tmr 1126 Half*<iiae: 1,255 1372 392 1,255 1372 392 *See Page 2 Kindogata tasnetiaos 194 879 30 46 8 26 28 8 8323 8323 26 28 8 17,902 17,902 30 46 8 19,828 19,828 (Over)C. D. E. G. H. Little Rock District FORM NO. FAPO-3B Figures in columns 2 thru 14 should be to the nearest whole number Resident pupils sent to other dist(s) under *M to M* transfers List Districts LEA NO. Pulaski County Pulaski County P4 North Little Rock Total C of columns 12, 13, 14. These win be used for MFP/Transp. Aid purposes Non-resident pupils received from other district(s) under "M to M* transfers. List Disuicts LEA NO. Pulaski County North Little Rock Pulaski County - P4 Total E 77-01 LEA Number 6/3/96 Quarter Ending Dale 6/17/96 Dale Submined M to M TRANSFERS Quarter Number SUPERINTENDENT'S QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT, GRADES K-12 ADT - ADA - ADM This report is due within fifteen (15) da>-s after the end of the quarter (Ait Code Aim. 6-18-213. Suj^. 1991). Send one cop>-to the office of Local Fiscal Services, #4 Capitol MalL Room 202-A, Little Rock. Arkansas 72201 and one copy to the County Board of Education. Each quarter is to be no less than forty (40) and no more than fifty (50) da^v. I 2 I 5 KINDERGARTEN DAYS IN ATTENDANCE DAYS 1995-96 Year Siqierintendent's Signature Phone# azum I 7 I 8 9 I 10 I 12 ADM GRADES 1-12 DAYS IN ATTENDANCE DAYS I 13 COMBINED TOTAL GRADES K- 12 DAYS IN QTR. NT* TOTAL COL 2+3 ABSENT* TOTAL + NT T TOTAL COL. 4+5 /COL. 1 TOTAL ABSENT TOTAL T NT COLUMNS 7+8 TOTAL T+NT COL 9 +10 /COL ADT COL 2 + 7 /COL. ADA COL. 4+9 /COL. ADM COL. 4+5+ 9+lO/COL 1 49 49 48 49 49 49 Number of kindergarten pupils enrolled this quarter 4908 3004 47 1672 93 1500 1765 Foil-time: 4908 3004 47 1672 93 1500 1765 25 286 279 1 114 5 19 119 Half-time: 106 67 36 2 31 38 44447 44447 3734 983 1007 1007 1089 8370 8370 746 190 175 1,183 175 1,183 191 1,280 13713 13713 764 295 314 332 3004 3004 181 66 65 68 31 31 16717 16717 945 361 410 431 Addidoaal instrucdoos oo back. FIN-09-00-005 5/91 W/P4C. D. E. G. H. Lillie Rock District FORM NO. FAPD-3B Figures in columns 2 thru 14 should be to the (dearest whole rHjrr^ber Residerrt pupds sent to other ^st(s) under *M to M" trartsfers List Districu LEA NO. Pulaski County Pulaski County P4 North Little Rock Total C <ri eokanrts 12, 13,14. These wfl be used for MFPZTrarsp. Aid purposes Non-residem pupis received from other (festrictts) under 'M M* transfas. List Districts LEA NO. Pulaski County North Little Rock Pulaski County - P4 Total E 77-01 LEA Number 6.3/96 Qturter Ending Due 6/17/96 Dale Submioed M to M TRA.NSFERS 4 OuMtCT Number SUPERINTENDENTS QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT, GRADES K-12 ADT - ADA - ADM Thii report dtie wilhirt rincen(I5)d<yt after (he end ofthe quanerC Ark Code Arm 6-18-213,Supp 1991) Send one copy to the ofTice of Local Fiscal Services. *4 Capitol Mall, Roon 202-A, Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 and ooe copy to the County Bard of Educaboo, Each quarter is to be no less than forty (40) and no more (han fifty150) days 7^71 KINDERGARTEN DAYS IN ATTENDANCE I 5 8 9 I GRADES 1-12 10 I DAYS ADM DAYS LN ATTENDANCE DAYS DAYS fN QTK- NT* TOTAL COL. 2*3 ABSENT* TOTAL + ST TOTAL COL. 4+5 /COL, I TOTAL NT COLUMNS 7+8 TOTAL ABSENT 49 49 48 49 48 49 49 Number of kindergarten pupds enrolled this quarter: 1672 93 1500 1765 FuU*Qme: 1672 93 1500 1765 114 5 19 119 Hilf-time: 36 2 31 38 13713 3004 16717 AdiStiaos] iosbvsiaBS cB bsck. 13713 3004 16717 /mw L?9S^ Ye TOTAL T+NT COL. 9+10 /COL. 764 181 945 nfIM<MO5 5l Si 3 Signann Rwoe * 324-2273 12 I 13 CO.MBISED TOTAL GRADES K-12 14 295 66 361 ADT COL- 2-^1 /COL ADA COL 4*9 /COL I 314 65 31 410 W/P4 ADM COL 4+5* 9+lOCOL. I 332 68 31 431C. 0. G. H. Little Rock District FORfZ NO. FAPD 3B Figures in columrts 2 thru 14 should be to the nearest whole number Resident pupils sent to other distls, under "M to M* transfers List Dtttncu LEA NO. Pulaski County Pulaski County P4 North Utde Rock Total C of coturms 12, 13, 14, These wiH be used for MFP/Transp. Aid purposes Norwesideflt pupis received from other (fistrictfsi under *M to M transfers. List Oistricts LEA NO. Pulaski County North Little Rock Pulaski County - P4 Total E 77-01 LEA Number 6/3/96 Quarter Ending Date 6/17/96 De Submined 4 Quarter Number M to M TRANSFERS SUPERINTENDENT'S QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT, GRADES K-12 ADT - ADA - ADM Thu report ii due within fifteen (15, d*\- after the end of the quarter! Ark Code Ana 6.18.213, Supp. 1991,. Send one copy to the office of Local Fucal Services. M Capitol Mall. Room 202-A, Little Rock. Arkansas 72201 and orte copy to the County Board of Education. Each quarter is to be DO less than forty (40) arvd no more than fiftv{50)davs I I 5 1995-% Year KINDERGARTEN DA'l'S IN ATTENDANCE DAYS I 7 I I I 10 12 ADM GRADES 1-12 DAYS IN OTTL 49 49 48 49 48 49 49 Number of kindergarten pupfls enrolled this quarter: DAYS IN ATTENDANCE DAYS 4908 3004 47 1672 93 1500 1765 Foil-time: TOTAL COL. 2+3 ABSENT* TOTAL + NT T TOTAL COL. 4+5 XOL 1 TOTAL NT COLUMNS 7+8 TOTAL ABSENT T+NT TOTAL COL. 9 *10 /COL. 4908 3004 47 1672 93 1500 1765 22 286 279 1 114 5 19 119 106 67 36 2 38 44447 8370 13713 3004 16717 Addioocal issmictioas oo back 44447 3734 983 8370 13713 3004 16717 746 764 181 945 nN-09-00-005 5/91 190 295 66 361 W/P4 /\iY\ le Supenntendent's Signature I U I u COMBINED TOTAL ADT COL. 2*7 rOL 1007 175 1,183 GRADES K > 12 ADA COL 4-9 /COL ADM COL 4-5- 9-lO-COL 1 1007 1089 175 1,183 314 65 31 410 191 1,280 332 68 31 431Little Rock EXstnct 76-01 LEA Number 6/3/96 Quarter Ending Date 6/17/96 Dale Submined 4 Ouaftn Number FORM NO. FAPO-3A MAGNET SCHOOL REPORT SUPERINTENDENT'S QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT, GRADES K-12 ADT - ADA - AD.M Bus rcpon IS due Within fifteen! 15) days after the end of the quarter (Art Code Ann 6-18-213. Supp IWI), Send one copy to the olTice of Local Fiscal Semees. M Capitol Mall, Room 202-A bole Rock, Arkansas 72201 and one (x>p> Io the County Board of Education. Each qumo ts to be no less than forty (40) and no more than fifty (50) days 1995.9 Schrxil Ve 1 3 5 6 7 Sape^niendeni & Signature This is to report information on the students atterxjirtg magnet schools. . DAYS IN ATTENDANCE DAYS ADM C. Little Rock (76-01) sent to Lttle Rock (76-01) Total K-12 C. N. Little Rock (76-02) sent to Little Rock (76-01) Total K-12 C. Pulaski County Special (76-03) sent to Little Rock (76-01) Total K-12 Total to be used in Funding Magnet School I 9 10 12 DAYS IN ATTENDANCE I 13 DAYS IN QTR. DAYS ADM I 14 COMBINED TOTAL GRADES K 12 NT* TOTAL COL. 2*3 KINDERGARTEN Number of kir>def9arten pupils enrolled this quarter
49 49 49 49 1,744 6,168 7,912 KINDERGARTEN 0 0 1,744 1,210 1,210 KINDERGARTEN 2,378 2,378 9,756 11,500 Fuil-tinie: ABSENT* TOTAL NT T TOTAL COL. 4-5 /COL. I ABSENT T NT Total Col.7-8 TOTAL T-KT TOTAL COL. 9 *10 /COL. ADT COL. 2*7 /CW- ADA COL- 4*9 /COL GRADES 1-6 1 1 1 ADM COL. 4-5* ^-lOiCOL. I 365 169 64 26 121 550 HaJf-Gme: 51 246 38,836 10,030 48,866 1,846 GRADES 7-12 17,027 47,524 3,293 69,333 27,057 96,390 5,139 2,072 1451 2129 2241 GRADES 1-e 0 0 0 0 0 69,333 13,353 13,353 612 GRADES 7-12 7,294 7,294 611 20,647 20,647 1,223 446 0 446 472 GRADES 1-S 21,860 21,860 837 GRADES 7-12 19,189 19,189 1,415 41,049 88,753 41,049 158,086 Additionai instructioos are oo tbe bacL 2,252 8,614 884 3,402 0 886 935 1,451 3,461 3,648A1. a. C. Pulaski County Liaie Rod 60-01 10 I? 96 Ooarter Lnirj Date 1 24 9 Date FORM NO, FAPO-3 6.3.32 Read carefully nstrjctions on Paje 2 Agures in columns 2 thru 14 should be to the nearest whole ntmber SUPERLSTENDENTS QUARTERLY ATTEa\DANCE REPORT. GRADES K-12 ADT - ADA - ADM Tie repcr. a x eCK ea. 15. dny acr cad cfstc quarter . Ark. Cede Au. ^16-213. Supp SJ .5J> lo lJ. toed Facal So-nces. *4 Mat. Rom 2O2-.A, LsAe Rock. Arianas ?220l sbl ooe copy- to the Cf^aty Beard of Edocatxn Each esner a vbe adless han fiyy ftimdensnryr fch-f1O>4sys I s 1 i i 11 u u KtMCERGARTEN DAYS IS ATTSOAS ZS DAYS ADM GRADES 1-12 DAYS r.- ATTBOAS'Cl DA^'5 TOTAL GRADES k-12 Residem pupils attending schools r, this district Alternative ueamtns Envtfonment Liet Sp. Ed. Sehoota by name Elaabeth Mrtchel Day Treatment Florence Crrttenton Home SerMce LRSD Evening High School Arkansas State hosprtaVDHS Residem pupds sent to PreK Sp. Ed. (non-pubBc) schools tnder a tixtion agreemerrt Restdent pupds sent to cUer ^stisj under tuition agreement Cl. Alternative Leamng Ertwonmertt List Dbtitcts LEA NO. 0- Total A, , C sf sounns 12, 13, *4. These vifli be used for MFP/Transp-Aid purposes E, Non-readent pupds received from other ^strictfs} mder a tuition a^eement list DisUicts LEA NO. I I El. Aftemative Learning eriysonment Non-resident pupds recerwed tatder Prtv. Tuit.* &?or *No Tiat. being patd* Total (A, D, E and r] H. DAYS DC QTR. 42 42 42 42 42 40 40 Number of kindergarten students enroCed tns 9je.~:( ASSENT- TOTAL 8,142 63,002 TOTAL OOL 2*3 71,144 DCrOKTAXT: Sec aeCc 18SS TOTAL TXT 3905 CCH. 4*5 .'COL 1 1787 299,138 422,030 I I t i R1.IUU. SUe. I T I {URtzoe: 616 569 1.440 I 494 i I I T T I I t I COLUMNS 7- 721,168 616 569 TOTAL T-ST COL 9-IC .<ca. 1 .ADT COL 2-7 JCOL 1 ADA COL 4-9 fCCX. I AD.M COL 4*5*9-K /COL 1 I 36,860 I 18,048 7316 j 18,865 19,835 ! i 7 I 15 15 i 15 25 14 14 14 i T T 15 14 1.440 I 494 1 I ( T I I 1 ) J i } 54 34 I 34 12 12 I I 1^ 12 7391 7391 T I I 18,940 19,910 18,940 19,910 <Owr)Little Rock Dntnct 01 LEA SsBnixT fAurter Endinf* Dale 1 >?4.'9T hate Submitted -JoarUr ''VtJkt SupcnntcrdcnJj Simaturc FORM NO. FAPO-3A MAGNET SCHOOL REPORT StPERlME.SDEM'S QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT^ GRADES K-12 1996-97 School car Phnrw = .ADT - AD.A - AD.M Thu repc?t 15 due wiihm fifteen (15
dap after the end of the quarter (.Ark. Code Ann. 6-1S-2I5. Sapp. !991>. Se:>3 <itK u- ths c-Sce oJ Local Fiscal Semesa. s4 Capitol .Mali, Rxwm 202-Little Rxxk, Arkansas 7220 ] and ooe cop> to the Count) Board of Edocitioo. Each quarter is to be no less than fsrtv 1401 and oo mor: than fifh'/SO) dat's I 6 7 S 9 10 II i: 13 14 This is to report informatior. or. students attending magnet schools. SI .AYTE'D.AVCE DAYS ADM 'S DAYS .ADM COMBL'.TD lOT.AL Or ADES E - 12 C. Little Rock (76-01) sent to Uttle Rock (7601) Total K-12 C. N. Littie Rock (76-02) sent to Little Rock (76-01) Total K-12 C. Pulaski County Special (76-03) sent to Little Rock (7601) Total K-12 Total to be used in Punaing Magnet School DAYS IS QTR. TOTAL COL. 2-? KINDERGARTEN .ABSENT- TOTAL T-NT TOTAL COL. 4-5 -'COL. 1 T Total C44.7-8 .^SEST TOT.AL T-XT TOTAL COL. 9 -rlO /COL. 1 ADT COL. 2-7 /COL. 1 .ADA COL. 4-9 /COL. 1 .ADM COL. 4-5- %-lOCOL. 1 GRADES I.B 42 42 42 42 Number of krxjergarten pupis enroBed tbcs quarter: 575 6,484 7,059 246 KINDERGARTEN 0 575 25,352 24,265 49,617 0 0 16.133 41,485 1,513 GRADES 7-12 18,707 34,840 GRADES 1-6 11,205 GRADES 7-12 6,614 42.972 84,457 11,205 6,614 2,263 3,776 2,101 1195 2179 2275 406 360 1,345 1,345 41 33 0 17,819 17,819 766 443 0 456 476 KINDERGARTEN GRADES 1-6 19,497 19,497 368 GRADES 7-12 0 l7,7l0 17,710 915 1,791 1,791 70 44 0 37,716 37,716 1,641 937 0 941 981 9,620 10,195 357 77 49,617 90,: 139.992 6,183 3,481 1,195 3,576 3.732 FoB-tnae: Hatf-Uzoe
.^4<iiti<xud iastma^aiB sr cs the back.h C. D. E. G. H. Little Rock Disinct 22ii C*sxrui EnJmc Dale 1/22/97 DaU Submitud \-xrha .SupenntnwieDts SierJlure PQAM NO PAPD-3e M tM TRANSFERS SVPERI>TE.\DENTS QVzKRTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT, CR-ADES K-12 ADT - ADA - ADM Thu rep'* wiftc fif.xcs(15) daj-j after the cod of the quarter ( Aric Code Ann. 6-18-213, Supp 1991). Send coe cop> to the oSkc of * hr fK* lew ftar fryfr and on rw
than fifh' <5^* da)'s Little Rock. Arkansas 72201 and otk cop>' to the Count) Board of EdncaXaoc. >eh quarter u I 3 4 I 5 6 7 8 I 9 10 I li 12 Phone o D I 14 KINDERGARTEN D.AT3 p
.ATnyP.ANCE DAYS AD.M GRADES 1-12 DAYS IN AlTEND.ANCE DAYS COMBINED TOTAL GRADES K -12 Figures in columns 2 thru 14 should be to the nearest whole number Resident pupis sent to other distls) under "M to M' transfers List Districts LEA NO. Pulaski County Pulaski County P4 North Little Rock Total C of columns 12, 13, 14. These w3 be used for MFP/Transp. Aid purposes Non-resident pupis received from other district(s| urxler *M to M' transfers. List Districts LEA NO. Pulaski County North Little Rock Pulsski County P4 Total E DAT'S IN QTR. 43 43 43 42 42 42 42 Number of kindergarten pupSs enroled this quarter: ABSENT* TOT.AL TOTAL 42 42 3878 1958 1974 1869 1974 EuD-tisaE: TOTAL COL 2-3 TOTAL T*NT COL 4-5 /COL. 1 T COLL'MNS .ABSENT TOT.AL T-NT TOTAL COL 9-10 .COL I ADT COL 2*7 .-COL. 1 .ADA COL 4-9 COL 1 ADM COL 4-5- 9-lOCCH- 1 387X 1958 1974 42 1869 2016 60 410 192 70 84 70 100 50 49 1 47 50 6030 1576 1576 42236 42236 3524 1064 1072 1958 1164 50 6030 14767 14767 .Additional iostrceticas on hack. 536 13J 140 1,212 153 1,317 14767 1576 16343 854 44 898 FIN-0W5 591 372 39 39 399 39 421 40 411 39 438 461 W/P4 39
This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.