LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS July 1, 1992 JUL 9 1992 TO: FROM: Boaxd, of Directors C.'^mT"Bernd, Superintendent of Schools Office of Desegregation Monitoring SUBJECT: EMPLOYMENT OF NEW ADMINISTRATORS I recommend that the Board approve the employment of the following individuals: Janet L. Bernard as Associate Superintendent of School Operations and Climate, effective August 1, 1992, at an annual salary of $68,900 plus car allowance of $1200 per year
Marie Parker as Associate Superintendent for Organizational and Learning Equity, effective July 27, 1992, at an annual salary of $65,000 plus car allowance of $1200 per year. Estelle Matthis as Associate Superintendent for Educational Programs and Learning Improvement, at an annual salary of $65,000 plus car allowance of $1200 per year. I am attaching biographical information on Ms. Parker. Bernard and Ms. In addition. I am recommending that the Board appoint Earl M. (Chip) Jones as Interim Manager of Support Services at an annual salary equivalent to $60,000, prorated for the number of days he serves in this position. 1, 1992. Mr. Jones' appointment is effective JulyRESOLUTION TO REFINANCE BONDS
Dr. Bernd explained that the District can save approximately $323,632 by refinancing the May 15, 1988 bonds. He recommended that the Board adopt the Resolution authorizing Stephens, Inc. to file application with the State Board of Education to issue bonds in the estimated amount of $5,500,000 for the purpose of refunding the District's bonds issue dated May 15, 1988. moved adoption of the Resolution. Mr. John Moore motion, and it carried unanimously. Mr. Dorsey Jackson seconded the attached to these minutes and made a part hereof. A copy of the Resolution is RESOLUTION ON POLICE RESOURCE OFFICER: Dr. Bernd recommended that the Board adopt the Resolution reiterating its commitment to the Police Resource Officer Program which was approved by the Board of Directors on December 19, 1991. Mr. Dorsey Jackson moved adoption of the Resolution. Ms. Pat Gee seconded the motion, and it carried five (5) to two (2), with Mr. Hamilton and Dr. Mitchell casting the dissenting votes. A copy of the Resolution is attached to these minutes and made a part hereof. APPOINTMENT OF ACTING ASST. SUPERINTENDENT FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS
Dr. Bernd recommended that Sam Stueart be appointed Acting Assistant Superintendent for Secondary Schools effective October 19, 1992, at a salary of $50,128 plus $1200 per year car allowance. Ms. Pat Gee moved the Superintendent's recommendation. Mr. John Moore seconded the motion, and it carried with five affirmative votes. Dr. Katherine Mitchell and Mr. Bill Hamilton abstained. ADJOURNMENT
Mr. Dorsey Jackson moved to adjourn, the motion, and it carried unanimously. Mr. John Moore seconded ___________________ _ There being no further business to come before the special meeting, the meeting adjourned at 6:05 p.m. 0. 0 : JaaSveTTi"^ PPrreesident Pat Gee, Secretary APPROVED: SLIP SHEET FOR REGULAR BOARD MEETING ON AUGUST 27, 1992 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS w' .m SB J3 ci Sases-'. H 1 August 27, 1992 TO: Board of Directors FROM: C. M. Bernd, Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: EMPLOYMENT OF MANAGER OF RESOURCES AND SCHOOL SUPPORT I am pleased to recommend the employment of Gary E. Jones as Manager of Resources and School Support at a salary of $65,000 plus $1200 car allov/ance effective September 14, 1992. A copy of Mr. Jones' resume' is attached for your review. POP*, 3 -x <53? WED Office SEP 1 M2 of Dososregation Monitoring TO: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS June 24, 1993 Board of Directors 72201 JUN 2 5 1993 OSiice of Desegregation Monttonng bD FROM: SUBJECT: C. M. (Mac) Bernd, Superintendent of SchoolscSJ DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS POSITION I recommend that Ms. Jeanette Wagner be appointed Director of Communications effective July 1, 1993 on the Administrative Non- Certified Salary Schedule at 04-7, which is a salary of $40,080.00 for the 1992-93 school year.EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT BETWEEN DR. CLOYDE M. BERND AND THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS This employment contract is made and entered into this twenty second day of May, 1992 by and between the Little Rock School District Board of Directors (hereinafter referred to as and Dr. II Cloyde M. Bernd Superintendent"). (hereinafter referred "Board"), to as WHEREAS, the Board desires to provide the Little Rock School District Superintendent with a written employment contract in order to enhance administrative stability and continuity within the Little Rock School District, which the Board believes improves the quality of its overall educational program
and. WHEREAS, the Board and Superintendent believe that written employment contract is necessary to specifically describe their relationship and to serve as the basis of effective communication between them as they fulfill their covenants and administrative functions District
in the operation of the educational program of the a NOW THEREFORE, the Board and Superintendent, for the consideration herein specified, agree as follows: 1. Term The Contract shall be from the starting date until June 30, 1995. It is mutually understood and agreed between the Board and Superintendent that in the absence of a written notice from one to the other of an intention not to renew this contract, such notice to be given by the parties hereto not sooner than October 31 and not later than December 31 of each calendar year, this Contract shall be automatically extended and kept in full force and effect subject to all its terms and conditions for a three year term commencing on the following July 1. Service of notice shall be by hand delivery or by certified mail, return receipt requested. Should the Superintendent be able to work for the Board prior to July 1, 1992, the Board shall pay for this work on a per diem basis calculated from the Superintendent's annual salary. Travel for the Superintendent to accomplish this work shall be paid for by the Board and shall not count as the "house hunting" discussed in Paragraph 3b. below unless the Superintendent's spouse accompanies him on such trips. 2 . Salary The Board shall pay the Superintendent an annual salary of $110,000.00 payable in equal monthly installments for the 1992-93 school fiscal year. JPersonnel Changes Page 5 June 24, 1993 NAME POSITION OR SCHOOL EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY CLASS SALARY Resiqnations/Terminations Non-Certified Employees Taylor, Alexander Reason: None Given Bus Driver Transpoirtation 5-13-93 3-10 9 $ 36.40 per day I Thompson, Tina Reason: Terminated Woods, Kimberly Reason: Medical Abrams, Annie Beasley, Christine Bryant, Axie Myers, Nona Randel, Charlott Spurgeon, Helen Stone, Martha Whiteside, Ida Bus Driver Transportation Custodian McClellan 5-21-93 5-22-93 Retirees Coordinator PAC Nurse Rightsell Secretary Mann Secretary Special Ed Media Clerk Wilson Secretary P/Personnel Secretary Mabelvale Jr Inst Aide Adult Ed 6-15-93 6-14-93 6-16-93 6-30-93 6-14-93 6-30-93 6-25-93 6-10-93 3-10 9 1-01 9.25 7-13 10 2-15 9.25 3-14 10 4-14 12 1-14 9.25 4-14 12 4-14 11.50 5-05 9.25 $ 36.40 per day $7,993 $22,965 $31,416 $15,362 $21,066 $14,484 $16,239 $16,239 $16,768 52.I Personnel Changes Page 2 September 23, 1993 NAME POSITION OR SCHOOL EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY CLASS Resiqnations/Terminations Certified Employees Patty, Barbara Reason: Accepted Another Position Pearson, Susan Reason: Relocating Purdy, Milton Reason: Accepted Another Position Quattlebaum, Steven Reason: Personal Rule, Elizabeth Reason: Accepted Another Position Smith, Natalie Reason: Personal Vanbibber, Cynthia Reason: Personal Wallace, Yulonda Reason: Personal Fike, Sarah Hardin, Richard Koehler, Yvonne Wood, Dianne SALARY Fifth Grade Pul Hgts Jr Counselor Wakefield Voc Elec Metropolitan Civics Mabelvale Jr French Central Sixth Grade Pul Hgts Elem Lrng Fnd Forest Hgts Sixth Grade Forest Park 8-13-93 8-12-93 7-30-93 6-14-93 8-9-93 7-31-93 9-10-93 8-11-93 Retirees Sixth Grade Chicot Music Parkview Phy Ed Booker Math Supv IRC 8-13-93 8-10-93 8-12-93 8-20-93 5-06 9.25 4-08 9.25 1-16 10 4-10 9.25 4-14 9.25 1-03 9.25 1-01 9.25 1-06 9.25 6-20 9.25 3-17 9.25 6-20 9.25 3-20 11 $28,324 $28,846 $32,118 $30,452 $33,664 $21,680 $20,074 $24,089 $40,670 $35,009 $40,670 $50,225 31.<! WILSON JONES COMPANY T70a0UF I PfcparecBy I
Approved 3y j
tniikus I Date J L I I J HUOE FH U.S>. ~ r I I- t ! '' h 3 1 C.7^t/4lJJSi4 ll 5 :c ie 1? 2C 21 ii II L.^^ 7ffr/^C k/b>o^j I L n .1 Ik^z ' r 7,3 y^r/^L - II li'^ZlP A-^ rz ??^ d- I* u 54^: xl /f i yW J5S^ to 06 k'jrl^zi b !> II _____LIS^&4 C^^Accoai il i L !^<^^'=^
^AU^y i |! ill 1,5^:^^ ^/O^r) C/yt/^Ldd 5]WI^j J___I
'^) CATtAcuyu I 7c (2/h^/ka>j T'o'ryf-L. l
|_____1 I i i| __i li-a/ ll 7o'7>}-(^ !! ^7^^ O'O DO >D I lifeg 3 oo| i lal/1teL
l I H
5^^l^jL 155^^ y3<y.... ' .^S, - /,A^__. . iJt,- ..a^iiiLiiM Id44^ oc JIW^ '773. : pcJ ? f}'' f Ml. Jjs OT gi J___1^ ^^11 I 1$^ <^1 i ' lyblct*^ LL^ 1 II I ^z:g>^^li I I 1 I il IL k5Wo!i 11:1! 11 tQ>iS> 3^. /,.^.x> jc. y/T 1 S'- I a? I ! I :4l3^^^i ^LzB/I^p^^ IM .1 II! '.c-/tl X. '^7'1 ^19. 0 erC !o2^ / Joo tiiI Communications I Assoc Supt I Oganizational & Lmmrig Equity J Ltiectivo Schools Sluders AssignmerS I Monitors j M ~ tmplementaiiorV Plannmg * EvatuMexi VeKrrteers si PvUc Schools Betore- < .^er School CARE L Parers ReouitmerS Parers Coordinator BOARD OF DIRECTORS I Superintendent 1 ITumair? As&tK. Sijpl. School Opera*. &C&rnate Hsaring Oflicor Ami SifS. Ele me rS ary 15 Schools Principale Teachers I WieetShre Schoote(7) Awl. 8^S. Elementary 14 Sdhoob Asel. Supi. Reading Language Sdanoa Principals PHncftal* Mathematics Teachers Teachers New Figures Atttletica Aflerrulhra Learning Sociel Slucfies Re sources/ ^abgHJsIgignB Assoc. Sl<3t I CtarfaAimA I LiminOhtpwmiJ Rne bstmctioruri Technology Physical Education Ovgt Heatih Education EarV Childhood Shdt Oevelopmenl Little Rock School District Organizational Structure September 1992 1 ' Manager Rasouroes & School S(<f>on I Vocatiofwy ConlroKer R.sk Wan ager*ient _ Federal Programs/ Grants FaoMas Services Procurement Eiceptiortal Children AduH Education Library Services Foreign Language Transportation Food Services Secunty ate Piocvse.ng 1 I I I Assoc. Supt Organizational & Laming Equity I Effective Schools Student Assignment I Monrtorirtg & ImplementatiorV desegregation Plan I Communications I Assoc. Supt. School Operat. &Cfrnate Hearing Officer Asst. Supt. Elementaiy 15 Schools Planning & Evaluation Principals Volunteers in Public Schools Teachers Before* & After-School CARE Parent Recruitment Parent Coordinator BOARD OF DIRECTORS I Superintendent I 1 11 I Schools (7) r Asst. Supt. Elementary 14 Schools Principals Teachers Reading 1 Asst. Supt. Secondary 13 Schools T Prirtcipals Teachers New Futures Athletics Ahematrve Learning Language Arts Science Mathematics Social Studies Human Resources/ Labor Relations Assoc. Supt. Curriculum & I Loaming Imprymt. I Fine Arts Irtstrudional Technology Physicat Education Drug & Health Education Early Childhood Staff Development Little Rock School District Organizational Structure APRIL 1993 1 Manager Resources & School Stpport I Vocational Controller _ Federal Programs/ Grants Facilities Services Procurement Exceptional Children Adult Education Library Services Foreign Language Transportation Security/Risk Management Food Services Information Services Board of Directors Regular Meeting June 24, 1993 6 table the Proposal for "President's Day" Holiday, seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. Ms. Pat Gee B. Approval of Custodian's Agreement Ms, Pat Gee moved to remove from the table the matter of the Custodian's Agreement. and it carried four (4) to two (2) . Mr. Bill Hamilton seconded the motion, John Riggs voted in opposition to the motion. Mr. Dorsey Jackson and Mr. Discussion ensued concerning the financial condition of the District and the financial ramifications of the Custodian's Agreement. Following discussion, Ms. Pat Gee moved to accept the agreement with the custodians. motion, and it carried four (4) to two (2) . Jackson voted in opposition to the motion. Dr. Katherine Mitchell seconded the Mr. Riggs and Mr. C. Approval of Bus Driver's Agreement Ms. Pat Gee moved to remove from the table the matter of the Bus Driver's Agreement. and it carried four (4) to two (2) . voted in opposition of the motion. Mr. Bill Hamilton seconded the motion. Mr. Riggs and Mr. Jackson Discussion ensued in which the same concerns were expressed concerning the financial condition of the District and the financial implications of the Bus Driver Agreement. Hamilton moved to approve the Bus Driver Agreement. Mr. Bill Dr. Katherine Mitchell seconded the motion, and it carried four (4) to two (2). Mr. Riggs and Mr. Jackson voted in opposition to the motion. D. Approval of Agreement on Central High Wellness Clinic Mr. Hamilton moved to approve the Agreement as reflected in the printed agenda. and it carried five (5) to one (1) . opposition to the motion. Dr. Katherine Mitchell seconded the motion. Mr. John Moore voted in E. Administrative Salaries Dr. Bernd directed the Board members' attention to the slip sheet on administrative salaries and recommended that the Board adopt the following: A $68,000 annual salary for the positions of Associate Superintendent and Manager of ResourcesBoard of Directors Regular Meeting June 24, 1993 7 and School Support for FY 1993-94
A $61,000 Assistant annual Superintendent, salary for the positions of Controller, Student Hearing Officer, and Desegregation Facilitator
A 1.5 percent base salary increase for all 12-month administrators for FY 1993-94
A 250 day contract for all 12-month administrators with paid vacation days based on experience in LRSD and PCSSD of 15 days for 0-7 years of service
20 days for 8-14 years of service
and 25 days for 15 or more years of service. A 3 percent base salary increase for all administrators on a less than 12-month contract
and The ability for administrators to accumulate sick leave up to contract. the length of the individual's informed the Dr. is Bernd Board that the Principal's supportive of the pay proposal as outlined. explained that he felt this pay proposal would allow the District Roundtable He to attract quality candidates for top administrative positions. on the budget. the proposal. Discussion ensued concerning the proposal and its impact After discussion, the chair called for a vote on There was no motion nor second, however, the vote on the issue carried five (5) to one (1). Mr. John Riaas voted "hav " Mr. John Riggs voted "nay. June 24, F. 1993-94 Budget Dr. Bernd reviewed the information sent to the Board 1993 marked "Corrected" in which he summarized . on the requested budget changes since the submission of the April 26, 1993 tentative budget. The chair asked Board members to state any opposition to a specific item included in the proposed budget. Discussion ensued concerning specific items included in the proposed budget, following which Mr. Jackson moved to adopt the proposed budget with the exception of the $280,000 for police resource officers and the $160,000 for the four assistant principals at incentive schools. for and it carried five (5) Ms. to one (1) . Pat Gee seconded the motion, Mr. John Riggs voted inNAME Linda Watson Othello Faison Leon Adams Mary Jane Cheatham Lavanna Wilson J ' & FROM Student Hearing Officer Alter. Learning Center Fed. Programs/Grants Baseline Elem. Bale Elem. TO J.A. Fair Asst. Principal Coordinator Fed. Program/Grants Arts, Music & Technology Transportation Hippy /Early Childhood LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS JULY 28, 1994 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Dr. Ricf? Director of Human Resources THROUGH: Dr. Henry Williams, Superintendent SUBJECT: Administrative Transfers reassignments of individuals have been completed and are presented for your information. NAME FROM TO Linda Brown Asst. Prin. PHJ Asst. Prin. Mann Othello Faison Principal Alt. Lrng. Center Coordinator Federal Programs Dennis Glasgow Supervisor Science Director IRC & Science/ Acting Director Mathematics Ed Jackson Unassigned Act/Parent Coord Office of Deseg Gene Parker Supervisor Eng/F Lang Acting Director Reading/L-Arts
F/Lang & ESL Larry Robertson Asst. Supt. Elementary Asst. Supt.'^'^^^^' Student HearingZ .C'U-k Vera Robinson Asst. Prin. Jefferson Asst. Prin. Watson Anna Joiner-Tatum Asst. Prin. Watson Asst. Prin. JeffersonRoger N. Williams Asst. Prin. Henderson Asst. Prin. Mabelvale Jr. Marion Woods Specialist Staff Development Acting Director Staff Developmentr> Regular Board Meeting September 22, 1994 Page 8 The Board returned from Executive Session at 8:45 and reported that no action was taken. p.m. The Superintendent recommended the following personnel changes which were presented on a slip sheet: MAME FROM TO Sadie Mitchell Principal King Acting Asst. Supt. Elementary Tyrone Harris Asst. Principal Terry Elem. Acting Principal King Elementary Othello Faison Coordinator Federal Programs Assist. Prin. Hall High School James Washington Asst. Prin. Hall High School Acting Prin. Henderson Jr. High Karen Buchanan Principal Henderson Jr. High Temporarily Assigned Student Office Assignment Dr. Edwin Jackson Prin. on Special Assignment - Student Assignment Office Principal on Special Assignment - Staff Development Betty Burr Assistant Prin. Fair High School Acting Asst. Voc. Director Metropolitan The following additional personnel changes were recommended: Arbadella Smith Assist. Principal McDermott Robert Jones Director of Safety and Security Alicia Finch Acting Asst. Prin. Fair High School Jacovelli moved that the items recommended by the Superintendent on personnel be approved as presented, seconded by Ms. Gee, and it carried unanimously. Ms.SLIP SHEET TO REGULAR BOARD AGENDA LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS n? ? January 27, 1994 21994 To: From: Brady Gadberry, Board of Directors or, Human Resources Through: Hen lliams. Superintendent of Schools Subject: Personnel Changes I recommend the approval of the following employment of new staff at the indicated positions, salaries and classifications: NAME POSITION OR SCHOOL EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY CLASS SALARY Glowers, Robert Director PRE 1-28-94 6-06 12 E/Stip C/A $22,423.48 1,362.50 408.75 (pro-rated) Hurley, Richard Director Human Resources 2-21-94 ADMUNC 12 C/A $28,287.81 348.75 (pro-rated) Modeste, Leon Sp/Asst/Supt Admin 2-21-94 6-18 12 C/A $22,984.95 348.75 (pro-rated) Personnel Changes Page 2 July 23, 1992 NAME POSITION OR SCHOOL EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY CLASS SALARY Resignations/Terminations Non-Certified Employees Ray, Jim Reason: None Given Bus Driver Transportation 6-5-92 3-02 9 $ 44.24 per day Scott, Chantra Reason: Terminated Bus Driver Transportation 6-12-92 3-01 9 $ 41.70 per day Smith" Gladys Reason: None Given Food Service Gari and 5-20-92 1-01 9 $ 6.22 per hour Tate, Erma Reason: None Given Supv Aide Watson 4-24-92 25-3 9 $ 5.05 per hour Harris, William Montgomery, Bradford Runyan, Debra New Non-Certified Employees Glazier Mai ntenance Di rector Transportation Secretary Plant Services 6-29-92 7-20-92 6-8-92 6-01 12 6-07 12 3-04 12 $18,490 $44,677.50 pro-rated $14,234 i I II Board of Directors Regular Meeting June 24, 1993 Jeanette Wa?Ser ^P^-^i"tendent appointed as Director of appointed as Princinai - - School, that Teresa r Carter be 10 recommended that Personnel, that Lilly ' i T_T.... 4 J , sss. Lan Mahony and the retirement of Da^z^i J ' --.oa.yi,auxui on elip sheets provided to Superintendent slip sheets Principal at Watson approve the resignation of provided to the Board in recc^nded that the Board approve the pS^onnei printed agenda. Mr. John Rigjs Pst Gee seconded changes that are contained in the moved the Superintendent's the motion, and it carried the room when the VI. Board. Board are the recommendation. vote was taken. report agenda A. Mr. J^nanimously. Mr. John Moore Desegregation Report Mr. Marvin Zimmerman development report to the exceeded the state members asked B. was out of Board. presented the 1992-93 annual staff requirements for%tafthat the District has questions. elopment hours. Board hours. Status Report This report was given during the section on the agenda. C. Progress Report: H Remarks From Citizens" Garland Incentive School black males in his school^^and ^^^jj^e^te^d Progress of allowing him to spend his budget on aonrrmri s assistance in school. Board members asked questions!^ materials for his on the VII. CONSENT AGENDA Mr. ___ John Riggs moved consent agenda, r x\.j.ggs moved approval of all t-ho -i-i- rried Mtchm seconded^S^^S
, The items approved by the foregoing motion were: (A) Adoption of Policy BDDB, (B) "School Board Agenda." Approval T the submission Local Application of the Carl to the Vocational Perkins and TechnicalLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS TO: FROM: Board of Directors Brady Gadherzry, Di THROUGH: He: aril. SUBJECT: Pers el C November 4, 1993 Human Resources imfeSuperintendent of Schools inges 7 I recommend the approval of the following employment indicated position, salary and classification: of new staff at the NAME POSITION OR SCHOOL EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY CLASS SALARY Glowers, Robert PRE Specialist 11-23-93 PRE 2-06 $20,297.50 , 10.5 Ed/ S t-17786.25 C/A 526.25 (pro-rated) I Assoc. Supt Organizational & Learning Equity T Effective Schoob Student Assignment I Monitonng & ImplementaliorV ubse^regatior^^ Plamir^g & Evaluation Volunteers in Public Schoob Before- A After-School CARE Parent Recruitment Parent Coordinator I Communicat ions I Assoc. Sqpl. School OperaL & Cfrnata Hearing Officer Asst Supt. Elementary 15 Schoob Principals Teachers ktcentfve Schools (7) Asst. Supt. Elementary 14 Schools Principals Teachers 1 BOARD OF DIRECTORS I Superintendent I Reading 1 Asst. Supt. Secondary 13 Schools J Principals Teachers New Futures Athletics Ahemalive Learning Language Arts Science Mathematics Social Studies Human Resources/ Labor Relattons Assoc. S(J0. Curriolumi I Leaning Imprvmt.l Fine Arts Instnxtional Technology Physicd Education Drug & Health Education Early Childhood Staff Development Little Rock School District Organizational Structure APRIL 1993 1 Manager Resources & School Sqcporl 1 Vocational Controller _ Federal ProgramaZ Grants Facilities Services Procurement Exceptional Children Adult Education Library Services Foreign Language Transportation Security/Risk Management Food Services Information Services RECEIVED JUL 2 G LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 July 15, 1993 TO: Mrs. Ann Brown, Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring FROM: e Estelle Matthis, Interim Superintendent SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE VACANCIES This communication is a follow-up of the productive meeting that Jerry Malone and I had with you in your office on July 9, 1993. I am providing you a listing of the people who are currently performing responsibilities that were assigned to the top administrators who recently resigned from the District and/or returned to another assignment: Vacated Position Assigned Responsibilities Superintendent Estelle Matthis Assoc. Supt. for School Operations Estelle Matthis (with advice and counsel from Jerry Malone) Assoc. Supt. for Curriculum Dennis Glasgow Manager of Support Services Jerry Malone (providing primary advice and counsel to Mark Milhollen) Asst. Supt.-Secondary Schools Victor Anderson Limited Science Supervisory Activities Annita Paul Mark Milhollen will consult with Bill Mooney on financial matters. The assistant superintendents report directly to me on a daily basis. The assistant superintendents will assume supervisory roles for the Incentive Schools.Maria Palter r ^eanalle WagrMr Communicalions I I ToBeAnnexneed AssockSid, SchodCpei^ BOARD OF DIRECTORS I Estells Manhi* Inlerlm Superintendent I Brady Oadberry Labor Relations I Estate Matthis Assoa D J CurlciMuin 'StLrdent Asejgnment T Rudolph Howard Hearing Offtesr Arma Hart Desegregation Rteilrtator 1 4 Alice Stovall Reading ] { *Rne Arts Debbie Milam Volunteers In Pubilo Settle Margaret Gremillior Aset. Supt.. Elem. ISSchoota Lany S. Roberteon Aset. Supt.. Bern. 14 Schools I To Be irwuncsd Gone Parker PdncFpote I Supt., Seo. 13 Sdioole ? I Arte/ Foreign L^uage - Dennis GJasgow Principals Inatrudiorml Techrwlogy ] } 4 Mariha Rodgers Balore- & After- School CARE Sdenoe terL Teachers Teachers Principals Teachers Physical Education DiartneWood MaJhomatl( Jo Evelyn Elston Drug location L Werie A McNeaJ BecbRafhw I Pannt Bacruitmentl Ooofdinator | Social Studies Pal Price Jncerrtivo Schools <7) Linda Young New Futures Early Childhood _ OonitaHudspoih ^herine Gill Parent Coordinator ] Responsibaily of Appropriate Associate Superinteadeitl SioK Development Athletics Othello Prison AAemathre Leamrno Fy Little Rock School District Organizational Structure JULY 1993 1 To Be Announced HumanResources Carol Green Yocalionai Leon Adama 1 ToBaAnnounoad Man^ReeoKss and Scind Support I 1 _ MarfcMillholfen Controner jPecieri Programa^ Grarrta [ Doug Eatpn Fadlitlea Servicae Charfle NeaJ Procursment Dr. Palty .Kohlor Ibnal Iren PaUehe Uprlln _ *w ivapuiMi Adub Education- 1 _ Brad Morilgo^ry Transporlalton . Lucy Lyon Library Services JacMeBoyMn Food^rvicea Bill Bamhousa SecvrityyRtsk ^an^gmenrt Dave Kngselia Wofmabon BeniceiAnn Brown Memo July 15, 1993 Page 2 The role and responsibilities of Desegregation Facilitator have been clarified and Mrs. Arma Hart will relocate to the Desegregation Office at 501 Sherman in a timely manner. (See Organizational Chart) Bill Mooney will continue to provide technical assistance. Interviews will be held to select principals for the following schools: July 15, July 20, July 21, 1993 1993 1993 Central High School Wakefield Elementary Mitchell Incentive School Mary Jane Cheatham, who is returning from a sabbatical, has been assigned to Baseline Elementary School. The District will need to advertise and select an Assistant Superintendent for secondary schools by the end of August, 1993. These responsibilities cannot be performed by Victor Anderson after school starts. You were most cordial and helpful during our visits. We will make every effort to respond to your concerns and requests in a timely manner. If additional information is needed, please contact me. /bjf cc: Board of DirectorsBoard Of Directors I Dr. Henry P, Williams Superintendent To Be Announced Special Assistfitt to Supt Estelle Matthis Deputy Superintendent Dr. Russ Mayo Assoc. Superintendent lor Desegregation I Sterling Ingram Assodaa tor Instruction to the Deputy Supetlrrtendent Jeanette Wagner Communications I 1 'Student Assignment Margaret QremlNton Larry S. Robertson Asst Suit, Elm. r- AsstStptElem. 16 Schools 14 Schools Dr. Victor Anderson Acting Asst Supt., Sk. 13 Schools Alice Stovall Reading Arma Hart Desegregation Fadiitator Debbie Milam Volunteers in Public School Principals Principals Principals Gene Parker - Lar^uage Arts/ Foreign Language _ Dennis Glasgow Science Bedw Rather Parent Rreeccrruurittmmeeint Coordinator Parent Involvement Brad Montgomery Transportation I I Teachers Teachers Teachers _ To Be Announced Mathematics Incertrve Schools Urxla Yotrng New Futures 'Athletics Othello Faison Alternative Learning Center Responsibility of Appropriate Associate Superintendent Marie A. McNeal Social Studies Dr. Linda Watson Hearing Officer Catherine Gill Parent Involvement Rne Arts 'tnstnjctional Technology physical Educational _ Jo Evelyn Elston Pupil ^rvices Pat Price Early Childhood Donita Hudspeth Stall Development Little Rock School District Organizational Structure December 2,1993 DRAFT #4 Mark MIhollen Acting Manager lor Support Senricss Carol Green Vocational Education Financial Services Leon Adams Federal Programs/ Grants _ Dr. Patty Kohler Ex Coptic Childe trorral ren Paulette Martin Adult Education Lucy Lyon Lbrary Services Doug Eaton Facilities Services Jackie Boykin Food Services Charlie Neal Procuremertt Bill Bamhouse Security/Risk Manaoement To Be Announced! Planning, Research and Evaluation I Dave Ki I InkxTTti ^ingsella Tallon Slices I Busness Systems Student Systems _ Brady Qadberry Labor Relations 1 To Be Announced I Human Resourcer Board Of Directors c Little Rock School District Organizational Structure November 4,1993 DRAFT #2 To Be An nouncod Special Assistant to Supt Dr. Russ Mayo Assoc. Superirrtendent for Des^regatlon Jeanette Wagner Communications I Student Assignment Margaret Gremlllion Asst Supt, Elem. 16 Schools 1 Arma Hart Desegregation Facilitator Debbie Milam Volunteefs in Public School Principals I Parent R Rather Recruitment Teachers Coordinator Parent Involvement Brad Montgomery Transportation Dr, Henry P. Williams Superintendent Estelle Matthis Deputy Superintendent Sterling Ingram Associate for Instruction to the Deputy Superintendent 1 Mark MIhoilen Acting Manager for Support Services It Human Resources To Be Announced Planning, Research and Evaluation I Dave Kingseila Information Services I I Business Systems Student Systems Larry S. Robertson Asst St^ Elem. 14 Schools Or. Victor Anderson Acting Asst Supt, Sec., 13 Schools Alice Stovall Reading Gene Parker Language Arts/ Foreign Language Rne Arts Instructional Technology Principals I Teachers Incentive Schools Principals Teachers Linda Young New Futures 'Athletics Othello Faison Alternative Learning Center _ Dennis Glasgow Science -( Physical Educational Carol Green Vocational Education Leon Adams Federal Programs/ Grants Dr. Patty Kohler Exceptional Children { AnandaJ Services Doug Eaton Facinties Services Jackie Boykin Food Services Brady Gadberry Labor Relations To Be Announced Mathematics Marie A. McNeal Social Studies Dr. Linda Watson Hearing Officer Catherine GiD Parent Involvement _ Jo Evelyn Ebton Pupil ^rvices Paulette Martin Adult Education Charlie Neal Procurement To Be ArwTounced Human Resources Pat Price Early Childhood Donrta Hudspeth Staff Development 1 Lucy Lyon Library Services Bill Bamhouse Security/Risk Management D Robert Glowers Phfswig. Resewdi I kWvin Schwartz Graras Miter } Board Of Directors I <45. Little Rock School District I La Sf>aW Atriium t S><. Or. C. Rueeelt Uayo Aaeoo. Superhtandent J Suaflen Vann ConMnunteattona I Student Assignment Lhrgaret OremIKon Aset SiipL, Elam. __H?^t I SedbUlohea Aset Supt, Elam. 14 Schools 1 Debbie Mlam Volunteers in Public Sc hod Becky FUlhar Parent Heaulmei Coordnator PrincipaJs I Taachars 1 Prindpsls I Taachars Dr. Henry P. Williams Superintendent Organizational Structure 1994-95 February 7,1995 (Sub)ect to Revtalona) Estelle Matthis Deputy Superintendent Sterthg Ingram Aaeodate tor Inatruotlon Io the Deputy Superbtendant I lnc*ntiv School* Denrrb Snider AaaL Supl., Secondary 13 Schools Gena Pakar Reading Gene Parker Language Arts/ Faaign Language ] Prindpais Teach ars Linda Young New Futures Athletics ] ] Di. Waler MaiMedi Akernafve Leamrig Center __ Dannis Qatgow Sdanoa Danrris Glasgow Mathematics Marie A. McNeal Sod al Studes Larry S. Robertson Hearing Officer Catherine QU Parent Irrvohramant ______J.. . IBA Legal Servtoee *Fine Arts/TAMic 1 Irrstructional Tachndogy Physical Educstiorral _ Jo Evelyn Elston Pi4^l Services Pat Price Early Childhood Marion Woods "" StaR DavaloprTtenl Marian Shaad HIPPY Fred Srrith He fie gw ler Support Senrkoae Card Qaen YocationaJ Education L*on A(Um - FadaraJ Programs/ Grants Dr. PaRy KoWar Excapeonal Cfildren Paulette Martin Adult Education Lucy Lyon Library Services Mark Mlhdtan Finarxial Services 1 Doog Eaton Fadtitias Sarvicas Jackie Anderson Food Sarvicas Charite Neat Procurerrrent Bobby Jones Secunty/Risk Manage me ra D Wary .*a*' Dishi Acing Dir. of Transportation 1 1 David Beason Inbimason Services rrp Mrwtt I trr* I Butirwtt SytUrr* Skidanl Systems ] _ Brady Gadbarry Labor Ralations ] 3 Or. Richard Hurlay Hurruan RasocrcatJBoard Of Directors Little Rock School District Organizational Structure 1994-95 \ (Subject to Revisions) I Leon Modesti Special Assistant to Supt. Or. C. Russell Mayo Assoc. Superintendent Desegregation Jeanette Wagner Communicalions 'Student Assignment -7---------- Margarft( Gfmiliion Asst. Supt. Ekm. 18 Schools Sadie Mitchell Asst. Supt., Elem. 14 Schools TBA Desegregation Facilitator Debbie Milam Volunteers in Public School Principals I Be< Parent )cl^ Rather nt Recruiimenl Coordinator 'Parent involvement TBA - Transportation Cr. Mary Jane Cheatham A^t. Dir. ot Transoortation Teachers Principals I Teachers 'Incentive Schools Responsibility of Appropriate Associate Superintendent Dr. Henry P. Williams Superintendent Estelle Matthis Deputy Superintendent Sterling Ingram Associate for Instruction to the Deputy Superintendent I TBA AssL Supt., Secondary 13 Schools Principals Teachers Linda Young New Futures Athletics Dr. Waler Marshaledt Alternaltve Learning Center DEC 1994 TBA Legal Services Mark Mllhollen Manager lor Support Services Or. Robert Glowers : Planning. Research & Evafuation David Beason In formal ion Services I Business Systems I Office of Desegregafci .,,13 Marvin Schwart: Grants Writer Student Systems TBA Reading Gens Parker Language Arts/ Foreign Language _ Dennis Glasgow Science TBA Mathematics Marie A. McNeal Social Studies Larry S. Robertson Hearing Oflicer Leon Adams Fine Arts<Muslc 'Instructional Technology Physical Educational _ Jo Evelyn Elston Pupil Services Pat Price ~ Earty Childhood 14 TBA Staff Development Carol Green Vocational Education Leon Adams Federal Programs/ Grants Dr. Patty Kohler Excecxional Children Paulette Martin Adult Education Lucy Lyon Lbrary Services TBA Financial Services Doug Eaton Facilities Services _ Jackie Boykin Food Services Charlie Neal Procurement ] Brady Gadberry Labor Relations Dr. Richard Hurley Human Resources Catherine Gill ! Parent Involvement: 1 Marian Shead HIPPY Bobby Jones Security/Risk Management TBA Technology ComponentBoard Of Directors Little Rock School District Dr C Ruaiati Uaya Aieoc. Suparlnianrtant SoMan Vann C am muAka Uon a 1 I iMoUtdaAa Sf>acWAubtaniia Sa/t - 1 >1 Aar<Uiyw>ar ... tdrgarat OrtaJOta AaattMiL.Ua. Udb kUclMl AaiAtif*.. (ha Swcly Raihar Coowuiar 0(4 I Uir^an Sdiwwta I Grarwa Wna I DaUMkUam Voaxa.ar h Pu s<*aat 1. Piincipab IlSdtoob Pnndpati U Sdwwb rrtnc^ S Inoa/aka S^tadt Dr. Henry P. Williams Superintendent IBA AaiUtanl Suparinlartdani Curriculum Support Or. Vkiar Artrtaraait iaA SManOary Gn PvMr nadlng4.anguag Am Oanrtb Glaagow SdanoartAtfhamaila PtiftaptU I) Schooh Carat Obaan Vocatlanal (Nucaiion PaUaSa Manh ArtUiENuatbn O.Wal* UanUbA AkamatnaLoanttng I AMdia Marta A. Uctlaal Social Sludlaa Caihartna OH Parant Invokamanc Bfarty Labor Ralallona Dr. ftkhafrt Hurtay Human Raaotrrcaa Or. Paly KoMar Eaoanienat ChU< 'A Jo Evalyn EUlon Pk44 mrvfoaa SUrtiAQ Ingram Sun Oawkfwnart Pal Pftoa Eart/ ClilUltood Lucy Lyon Ta<Ninotogyrt4a41a Martan Shaart HIPPY Organizational Structure 1995-96 August 22, 1995 (Sub|oc| (o Roylaloru) Lany S. Aobadaen Aathtad Suparlntard^ SludanI Haartrig FnNSrrAli Uanaf It lar Sbpport SarvkM Mark Miltolan Fhnandal Sarvloaa ChartbNaal Proouramari Ooug Ealon Plant Sarrtoaa Bobby Jenaa Saouny/Rlih UanagamarN Mary Jana Chaaiham OIr.ot Tranaportatton Obactor Food Sarvtoaa Oa^M Caaaon hbrautiBA SarvtcM laon Adarvw Programa/ Or anta Lkyrta Young Haw FUutaa o w p 2 n p cr. o 3 P rt zr p > H H > n K 2 w HBoard Of Dlractora Little Rock School District 1 LawHodssla tpadd JWolantto Or. C. Ruaaafl Mayo Asaoe. Supartrtlandard Daoagragstten T tusMan Vm CemmunleaMona Dlrador til SludanI AaalgnmanI I T~- Margarat QramMan As<9up(.,ElaoR. HUhyIg UdtaURchal Aaa1.tu|rt.,EI>ni. HUteoto 1 Or hobail Ctowars Ranr>g Rmadi I EvatuMoi PfhdfMita Pibclpato Marvin Schwartt Oranis WrVa* I I Taachara Taacteft OateWMInm Voixrtaara li Pu^tc Schoob BacWnnlhar ParanI naorulmani Coordinalor | Dr. Henry P. Williams Suparlntandanl I nA Etlella Matthis Deputy Supwinlendenl Starting Irigrnm Assoalala for fnalruetleg M Iha Daguty BupartrHarHlard Lwry notertaen uftarlrdandaM Wudant Kaarintomoar 9chooJf1 tonntolnWw M. k*t, iMoitoi llldieeta OanaParIrar naadbg Oana Psikar Larxiuaga Arts/ Foraign Languaga f Im ArfMjlo 'Inilfudlonat Taohnotogy Pr1ndpt I TaMter t Inda Young Naw Futuraa 1 AthtaHca O WtfWVwtfWadt ARsmiIvS Lstnirig Canlsr Dannb QIaagow Sclanea Dannb Glasgow Malhematica Marta K McNaat Social Sludtaa CattMflna OP Parard Involvamatd physical Education Jo Evatyn EWon PupI Sar^rtcaa PalFfloa Fifty ChMhood Marton Woods Sfaft Oavalopman* Martan Shaad HIPPY Organizational Structure 1994-OS March 15,1005 (Bub|et to nevtolMW) StoSaMi kt topper laikM OavtlBaason Worms Ion Sanbaa Buabaaa Syalama CMilQraan \AMilanil GduealQn lon Advm - rdnit Ptoortn Qi I PtOOrtmt/ IflM w, raiay nKwohiRte f eM4tonaf ChibrM PauMloMarth Adul Education Lucy Lyoo Library SanXoM Marit MBwIan Fbandal SacAoaa OougEfon JacMa Andarson Food Sarvleoa Chama NmI Pfoeuramanl PobbyJoras SacunryAUilt Managjmard 53.JhraChiWupn IngOfr. ol taportaHon Studard Syslama Prarfy Oadber^ Late) netatlona Or. Richard Hurta^ Human Rasouroo' SLIP SHEET TO REGULAR BOARD AGENDA LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS RC rL?l o**B January 27, 1994 '"fS 219^4 Office of Dessgrogaiicn Monucring To: From: Brady Gadberry, Board of Directors or. Human Resources Through: Hen Hi ts. Superintendent of Schools Subject: Personnel Changes I recommend the approval of the following employment of new staff at the indicated positions, salaries and classifications: NAME POSITION OR SCHOOL EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY CLASS SALARY C1owers, Robert Director PRE 1-28-94 6-06 12 E/Stip C/A $22,423.48 1,362.50 408.75 (pro-rated) Hurley, Richard Director Human Resources 2-21-94 ADMUNC 12 C/A $28,287.81 348.75 (pro-rated) Modeste, Leon Sp/Asst/Supt Admin 2-21-94 6-18 12 C/A $22,984.95 348.75 (pro-rated) T)eC..,Aiay 11^ 1fiV-Board Of Dlraclora Little Rock School District 1 Leonlkidiala Ipettd Aadttmtte Or. Henry P. Wllllame Suparintendenl I Eatalle Malthla Deputy Superintendent BtarllnQ Ingram Or. e. RueeeH Mayo Aaaoe. Supartntandard Deaegragallon T uaHet) Vatwr CommurrteaUona I 1 AtaoelHla lor tnMruetton t . _ Iha Deputy Su|>f1nfndar4 T IncaolM Schoda] Dlreciorol Student Aaelgrunent Margaret OreriMen AeM. Supt., Elam. KSdtyle tatfta igietMl Aaat.fupt.Elam. KScbeela Dannie tnWar AaalSupt, Saeoni llUhooto3 Dr Robert Ooeera Ramrtg Ramrdi I Eveiuelan PrbdpaM Mardn Schtearlt Oranit Wrier I 1 Prinelpeie Pflndpata Taachare DebMa Mam Vobntaertb Pubhc Schoole ] T T Taechere Teaohare Lbda young NewFutufee 1 Declw Rather Parent Reorulmeni Cmdtnalor I AIhMIca D ytiMdi Alamalve Laarring Center ZZEZ TBA LagrfSarvleaa Lry nebeftaon Aeet. tupertnlendent Wudent Hearing Otnoer OeneParhet Readbg Qene Parker Language Ada/ Foreign Language Dannie Qleegow Sclanee Dennla Olaegow MMhemaitca 11 tine ArteAluaio 'tnatructlonat Technology ThyelcW Educehon Jo Evelyn EWon Pupl9en4cee Marte A KfcNeal Social Studtea CatharbeOl Parent Involvemenl1 Pal Pftoe - Earty Chldhood Marton Woode Staff Oavalopmanl Martan Shead HIPPY Organizationai Structure 1094-05 March 15,1005 (8uMet to Revtalone) Red Maith KhnagvhrMitoert tofkee DavUBaaeon Inlormelon Sarvloae Buebeee Syeteme CereOeen 'Acelenai GdueaVon Marti MBwIen Ftnarwtal SorMoee1 Student Syeleme leer) Adeim - rejanl Ptcgrvra/ QrM O. Pally Kohler ~~ aEaaaea^a<kaimMMaatl CtwtM PauMte Marib Adul Educalloo Lucy Lyon Ltwary Serwtoae OougEelon Fecttlae Sarvlcas . JacMe AMeteon Pood Sarvleoe J Brady Oadberry Labor ReUlone Chama Neal Procurement Bobby Jonee Securty4Uil( a 'JbreChatfkam Acting DIf, ot TmnaportaMon Or. Richard Huday ttuman Raeouroas Board Of Directors Little Rock School District Organizational Structure 1994-95 Draft (Sub|ect to Revisions) 4- i Dr. Henry P. Williams Superintendent I Leon Modest* Special Assistant to Supt. Estelle Matthis Deputy Superintendent TBA Legal Services Or. C. Russel! Mayo Assoc. Superintendent Desegregation Sterling Ingram Associate lor Instruction to the Deputy Superintendent Mark Milhollen Uartagerlor Support Services Or. Robert Clowers Planning, Research & Evaluation 1 David Beason ' Inlorrnalion Services Marvin Schwartz Grants Writer Jeanette Wagner Communications 1 Student Assignment htargarei Gremilllon Asst. Supt,, Elem. 16 Schools 1 Business Systems Student Systems TBA Desegregation Faalltaior Debbie Milam Volunteers in Pudic School Principals I arent Rather ecrunmenl Coordinator Parent Involvement TBA - Transportation D. Mary Jane Cheatham Asst. Dir. ol Transoorlation Teachers Sadie Mitchell AssL Supt.. Elem. 14 Schools TBA AssL Supt., Secondary 13 Schools TBA Reading Gene Parker Language Arts/ Foreign Lartguage Principals 4- Teachers Incentive Schools Responsibility oC Appropriate Associate Superintendent Principals Teachers Linda Young New Futures Athletics Dr. Waler Marshaleck Alternative Learning Center Dennis Glasgow Science TBA Mathematics Marie A. McNeal Social Studies Larry S. Robertson Hearing OWicer Catherine Gil Parent Involvement Leon Adams Fine Arts/Muslc InslrucSlonal Techrwiogy Physical Educational _ Jo Evelyn Elston Pupil Services Pat Price ~ Early Childhood TBA Carol Green Vocational Education Leon Adams Federal Programs/ 1 . SiaH Development Marian Shead HIPPY Grants Dr. Patty Kohler Excecxional Children Paulette Manin Adult Education Lucy Lyon Lbrary Services TBA Financial Services Doug Ealon Facikiies Services Jackie Boykin Food Services Charlie Neal Procurement Bobby Jones -> Secunty/ftisk Management _ Brady Gadberry Labor Relations Dr. Richard Hurley Human Resources TBA Technology Comoonent 1 D Robert Clowar* PWraig. Ranach I ] Board Of Directors Little Rock School District Marvin Schwarts Grarat VWrter } I leoa blodeba SpeoW is detent Ie Sipt Dr. Henry P. Williams Superintendent I Estelle Matthis Deputy Supeiinlendenl TBA legal Servicea Dr. C. Ruaaall Uayo Aaaoo. Suparkvtandant Daaegragelion T Suellan Vanrv Com m un io at ion a I Student Assignirvent Ibrgsrel Okamlllan Asel $MPL, Etam. Sada Ulohe4 Atal Supt, EWfn. 14 Sohoole 1 Dabtsa Mtsm Voluntaart in Public Schc^ Becky Rather Raautmai Parani C^inHof Piincipalt I Taachars Prindpa/t I Taacliars Starling kigram Aaaocleta (or kiatructlon to the Deputy Suparkitandar't I lno*n1tv SchooJi Dannie Snider Aatl. Supt., Secertdery 13 Schools Gene Perkar Reading Gena Parker Language Azts/ Fvaign Language ] Tina Arts/Muaic 'instructional Tachndogy Prindpds _ Daniia Glasgow Sdanc* Physical Educational Taachars Dannis Glasgow Malltenuilics Jo Evelyn Elston Pl4>I Sarvicat linda Young New Futures AUiletics ] ] D W^KUaihdtck Akernsive Liaming Cn)i MndaA MUUal Sodal Studies Pat Price Early Childhood Livry S Fkbertson Hearing Officer Catherine OB Parent involvament Marion Woods Staff Oavafoprrwnt Marian Sira ad HIPPY Organizational Structure 1994-95 February 7,1995 (Subject to Revialona) Fiad Strfdi Msnegir lar Support Sarvloae David Baason Inbimstion Sarvicat Businass Sytiam* Stieda n( System* ] Card Gf^n 7ocaoo*l Education Mark MIhdIan Financial Services ] Laon Adam* - FadaraJ Piogram*/ Grants Doug Eaton Fadlilia* Sarvicat Or. PaR/ Kohlar Exceptional Children Parlelta Martin Aduh Education Lucy Lyon LiLvny Services Jadu* Anderson Food Sarvicat _ Brady Gadbarry Labor Ralationa Charlia PiocuramanI Bobby Jonas Security/Risk Management Ct Ui Usry .***' Oreihem Acting Dir, ol franspcrution ] J _ Or Richard Ihtley Human Rasoctca!]Employees Earning $40,000 or Above DONNA C BROADAWAY EMANUAL BROOKS SHARON A BROOKS KATHLEEN BROTHERTON JAMES BROWN lInda'g brown ROBERT L BROWN JR ETHER L BRUCE-UPKINS DELOIS BRYANT JUDY E BRYANT KAREN J BUCHANAN DOLORES J BUFFINGTON SCOTTIE L BURCHETT BOBBYE H BURK BETTY R BURR EVELYN J CALLAWAY MORM'AN M CALLAWAY ^ATSY R CAMPBELL CHARLENE D CARPENTER RENE T CARSON JODIE T CARTER LILLIE M CARTER________ 'HYLLIS V CARUTH FRANCES H CAWTHON SUSAN L CHAPMAN GUY H CHEATHAM MARY J CHEATHAM GEORGE E CIRKS ELLEAN D CLEVELAND UBRARIAN-ELEM TEACHER (KSSTPRINCPALELEM TEACHER____________ TEACHER *SST PRINCIPAL SEC V ROBERT L CLOWERS SUSAN E CODY-TAYLOR ELEANOR R COLEMAN STEVEN B COLUE MABEL A COLLINS______ ROBERT S CONNOLLY MARY A COOPER SUE J CORKER BILLIE J CORROTHERS THERESA J COURTNEY BERNIE L COX ELEANOR V COX ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER COUNSELOR-SEC COUNSELOR-ELEM ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER ASST PRINCIPAL SEC TEACHER_____________ TEACHER COUNSELOR-SEC_____ COUNSELOR-SEC TEACHER SECONDARY PRINCIPAL ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER ELEM PRINCIPAL SUP SPED TEACHER_____________ ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER ASST PRINCIPAL ELEM DIRPLNG, RES & EVAL TEACHER_____________ COUNSELOR-ELEM "TEACHER TEACHER SYSTEM MANAGER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER_________ ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER ^AMELA J CRAWFORD BILLIE J CROSS KATHRYN L CROSS SAM H DACE ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER__________ TEACHER TEACHER COUNSELOR-SEC $41,728.54 $48,083.14 $42,371.00 $40,670.00 $43,846.74 $39,269.00 '$50,668.20 $40,670.00 $43,891.62 $40,670.00 $50,975.00 $40,670.00 $32,696.44 $33,664.00 $39,883.00 $43,846.74 $36,676.00 $41,791.23 J43,846.74 $45,964.94 $61,018.00 $44,169.40 $40,670.00 $46,336.40 $45,648.10 $40,670.00 $56^086.80 $38,763.00 $42,371.00 $49,370.40 $40,670.00 $12'670.00 $47,438.82 $42,116,22 $43,148,00 $43,846,74 $43,846,74 $40,67060 $42,002.40 $40,670.00 $51,752.80 $45,964.94 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $41,791.23 $0.00 $661.00 $2,205.60 $0.00 $0.00 $1,731.00 $4,326.00 $0.00 $751.00 ___ $0.00 $2,625.00 $0.00 $9,428.66 $6,732.60 $1,952.00 ____$0.00 $7,648.90 $0.00 $0.00 ____$0.00 $900.00 $2,064.00 ____$0.00 $2,064.00 $2,126.00 $0.00 $2,564.00 $5,034.35 $1,731.00 $900.00 $751.00 $0.00 $6.00 $750.00 $926.00 ____$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $564.00 $9,376.30 $2,566.00 $658.00 $0.00 $656.61 $0.00 $41,728,54 $48,744,14 $44,578,60 $40,670,00 $43,846,74 $41,000,00 $54,994,20 $40,670,00 $44,642,62 $40,670,00 $53,600,00 $40,670.00 $42,325,10 $40,396,80 $41,635,00 $43,846,74 $44,524,90 $41,791,23 $43,846,74 $45,964,94 $61,918,00 $46,233,40 $40,670,00 $46,400,40 $47,774,10 $40,670,00 $58,650,60 $43,797,35 $44,102,00 $50,270,40 $41,421,00 $40,670,00 $47,438,62 $42,866,22 $44,074,00 $43,646.74 $43,846.74 $40,670.00 $42,566.40 $50,046.30 $54,316.80 $46,622.94 $40,670.00 $41,326.61 $41,791.23 as of 2/22/94Employees Earning $40,000 or Above EMPLOYEE____________ FRANCES M ABLES NANCY L ACRE JANET L ADAMS WAYNE E ADAMS Leon L ADAMS JR MARTHA D ALLEN MARY L ALLEY VICTOR ANDERSON III JOYCE A ARICK JANE G ARTHURS VIRGINIAS ASHLEY CLARA D AUSTIN JUNIOUS C BABBS JR MARY D BARKSDALE CAROL BARNHOUSE WILLIAM G BARNHOUSE V/ANDA F BASKINS V MARJORIE BASSA FRANCES K BATEMAN MICKEY L BATES SHARON A BAUGH EMMA J BEAVERS ... LINDA J BELL RUTH E BERRY IRA L BETTON DANNY H BLACK NANCY P BLACKSTONE BARBARA B BLAINE SAM K BLAIR RITA L BLEDSOE DONALD K BLESSING EDDIE L BOONE DEXTER L BOOTH JACKIE L BOYKIN JUI^ L BOYLE ROBERT L BRACK GAYLE B BRADRDRD MARTHA A BRANCH SAMUEL BRANCH NANCY L BRANDT DENNIS R BRANT DONALD E BRATTON ROSEMARY M BREWER MARILYN J BREWSTER TITLE librarian-JR ' SECONDARY PRINCIPAL TEACHER____________ COORD PLANT SERVICE DIR FED PROGRAMS COUNSELOR-VOC TEACHER____________ ' SECONDARY PRINCIPAL TEACHER TEACHER ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER_____________ SECONDARY PRINCIPAL asstprincipaL elem TEACHER_________ DIR SECURITY_________ TEACHER_____________ EVAL SPECIAUST TEACHER TEACHER ASST PRINCIPAL SEC COUNSELOR-SEC TEACHER TEACHER_____________ TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER COUNSELOR-ELEM COUNSELOR-SEC TEACHER TEACHER_____________ TEACHER ASST PRINCIPAL SEC DIR FOOD SERVICES COUNSELOR-SEC TEACHER SECONDARY PRINCIPAL TEACHER_____________ ELEM PRINCIPAL LIBRARIAN-ELEM TEACHER_____________ TEACHER TEACHER_____________ ASSTPRINCIPAL SEC __ BASE $41,728.54 $56,798.00 $40,670.00 $50,781.00 $60,2^.00 $48,083J 4 $40,670.00 $65,676.00 $48,083.14 $43,846.74 $52,837^40 $40,670.00 $62,18200 $42,371.70 $40,670.00 $57,546.00 $46,165.42 $38,400.00 $40^670.00 $40^670.00 $45,474.00 $43,646.74 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $36,676.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $47,024.04 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $32,118.00 $46,088.00 $50,592.00 $42981 48 $40,670.00 $57,962^00 $40,670.00 $42,002.40 $40,905.08 $43,846.74 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $42,986.00 STIPEND $0.00 $2,300.00 $0.00 $2,013.00 $2,900.00 $0.00 $0.00 $21,294.00 ___$661.00 $430.00 $2,064.06 _____$0.00 $2,400.00 $1,665^06 $750.00 $2,783.00 $661.00 $3,900.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,840.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $6,893.90 $750.00 $0.00 $751.00 $0.00 $0.00 $7,901.20 $1,952.00 __$900.00 $0 00 $0.00 $2,800.00 _____$0.00 $5,684.00 $0.00 $8,134.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,709.65 TOTAL $41,728.54 $59,098.00 $40,670.00 $52,794.00 $63,192.00 $46,083.14 $40,670.00 $86,970.00 $48,744.14 $44,276.74 $54,901.46 $40,670.00 $64,582.00 $44,036.76 $4 <420.00 $60,329.00 $46,846.42 $42,300.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $47,314.00 $43,846.74 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $43,769.90 $41,420.00 $40,670.00 $47,775.04 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,019.20 $46,040.00 $51,492.00 $42^981 ?46 $40,670.00 $60,762.00 $40,670.00 $47,686.40 $40,905.08 $51,960.74 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $46,695.85 as of 2/22/94 IEmployees Earning $40,000 or Above MARTHA G DANIEL ROSAUE G DANIEL MABLE L DANIELS JULIE K DAVENPORT DONNA J DAVIS PRANKLIN A DAVIS KENNETH W DAVIS JWERAJDAVIS RICHARD A DAVIS SHARON D DAVIS SHIRLEY A DAVIS SUANNA J DAVIS LONNIE S DEAN JOHN L DEDMAN JR LOiS M DERRINGTON DEBORAH DESJARDIN PATRICIA D DICKINSON DOYLE R DILIAHUNTY TOMMY L DODSON MABLE L DONALDSON FAITH R DONOVAN MARTHA S DOUGLAS JOSEPHINE DUMAS vFTHELB DUNBAR DANA H DUNCAN LENORAADYER MARION O EASTER L.B. EASTER JR DOUGLAS C EATON CAROLYN EIDSON JO E ELSTON GLEN E ESKOLA RICKY L EVANS THELLO O FAISON JEROME FARMER JR VIRGINIA S FAUBEL FREDERICK L FIELDS ALFRED W FLANIGAN EUZABETR T FOTI EARLENE W FOWLER JANICE R FREEMAN DANNY A FULLER LENA A FULMER BRENDA J FUTRELL BRADY L OADBERRY JR TEACHER LIBRARIAN-JR COUNSELOR-SEC ~ ELEM PRINCIPAL_________ ELEM PRINCIPAL ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER TEACHER COUNSELOR-SEC_______ ELEM PRINCIPAL_________ COUNSELOR-ELEM TEACHER ELEM PRINCIPAL_________ asst PRINCIPAL SEC JBRARIAN-JR___________ TEACHER TEACHER________________ VOC ADMIN TEACHER GIFTED & TAL SUPERVISOR TEACHER TEACHER_______________ TEACHER EVAL SPECIAUST_________ TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER DIR PLANT SERVICES LIBRARIAN-ELEM DIR PUPIL SERVICES TEACHER TEACHER DIR ALT LEARNING CTR TEACHER TEACHER ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER________________ TEACHER TEACHER________________ TEACHER TEACHER SUP SPED________________ TEACHER DIR LABOR RELATIONS $40,670.00 $41,726.54 $41,791.23 $48,503.40 $57,169.20 $40,920.00 $36,876.00 $40,925.97 $43,846.74 $50,668.20 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 .$57,169.20 $45,034.00 $41,728.54 $40,670.00 $35,009.00 $55,397W $39,756 42 $47,a4242 $40,670.00 $43,646.74 $40,670.00 $42,371.00 $40,670.00 $43>46.74 $40,670.00 $33,664.00 $57,135.00 $41,728.54 $58,587.00 $40,670.00 $45,037.98 $50,225.00 $38,763.00 $45 829.03 $38,750.80, $33,162.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $36,876.00 $45,648.10 $48,083.14 $63,347.00 ________$0 00 $0.00 ________$0.00 $2,064.00 ____$2,064.00 $2,825.00 $5.746.90 ________$0.00 $1,000.00 $4,263.20 _______$000 _______$0.00 $4,828.00 $451.49 ________$0.00 $751.00 ____$7,001.80' $6,100.00 ____$1,90 LOO $2,189.00 ________$0.00 ________$0.00 ________$0.00 $2,206.00 ________$0W $0.00 ________$0.00 $6,732.60 $1,200.00 ________$0.00 $2,400.00 $6,897.36 ________$0.00 $1,952.00 $5,985.35 ______ $0.00 $2,064.00 $7,409.60 ________$0.00 ________$0.00 ________$0.00 $6,499.60 $2,169.00 _____$660.57 $2,400.00 $40,670.00 $41,728.54 $41,791.23 _______$50,567.40 _______$59,233.20 _______$43,745,00 _______$42,622.90 _______$40,925.97 $44,646.74 _______$54,931.40 _______$40,670.00 _______$40,670.00 $61,997.20 _______$45,485.49 _______$41,728.54 _______$41,421.00 _______$42,010.60 _______$61,497.00 _______$41,657.42 _______$50,031 42 _______$40,670.00 _______$43,846.74 _______$40,670.00 $44,577.00 ______$40,670.00 _______$43,646.74 _______$40,670.00 _______$40,396.80 _______$56,335.00 _______$41,728.54 _______$60,987.00 _______$47,567.36 _______$45,037.98 _______$52,177.00 _______$44,746 35 _______$45,829.03 _______$40,814.80 _______$40,571.60 _______$40,670.00 _______$40~670.00 _______$40,670.00 $43,375.80 _______$47,837.10 $48,743.71 $65,747.00 as of 2/22/94. Employees Earning $40,000 or Above HELEN B GADDY MARY J GAGE CHARLES W GATES NELUEC GERARD CATHERINE J GILL HARVEY R GILLESPIE DENNIS R GLASGOW RANDALL A GLENN LAVERNE G GOLDSBY MARY R GOLSTON JEAN A GOZA HARRYETTE GRAHAM JAMES T GRANT BARBARA A GRAVES JESSICA A GRAVES CAROLYN W GRAY PEGGY A GRAY__________ CAROL B GREEN_________ CHRISTINE GREEN MARGARET B GREMILUON PAULA E GRIER__________ VIRGINIA A GROCE_______ WILLIAM J GRUMMER . CARLFGRUMMERJR MARY E GUINN__________ RANDY E GULLETT GRACIE J HALL SHIRLEY L HALL ANNE HANSEN SHIRLEY B HARPER ARMA J HART EVERETT M HAWKS STEVE A HAYES ND A L HAYS VERDIA M HENCE BETSY D HENDERSON J C HENRY TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER COORD INCENTIVE SCH TEACHER_____________ SCIENCE SUPERVISOR SPEC/LC COUNSELOR-SEC ELEM PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT TEACHER TEACHER_____________ SUP SPED COUNSELOR-SEC TEACHER TEACHER_____________ DIR VOCATIONAL ED TEACHER_____________ ASST SUPT - ELEM STAFF DEVELOPMENT TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER TEACHER__________ TEACHER__________ ASST PRINCIPAL SEC TEACHER DESEG FACIUTATOR ASST PRINCIPAL SEC SUPV MNT TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER RONALD F HESSELSCHWERDT TEACHER =>ATRICIA H HIGGINBOTHAM EDNA W HIGGINS-NORTH BEVERLYJ HINES SELMA P HOBBY SANDRA L HOFF' DOUGLAS B HOFFMAN RALPH G HOFFMAN ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER TEACHER EVAL SPECIALIST LIBRARIAN-ELEM TEACHER SECONDARY PRINCIPAL $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $48,083.14 $40,670.00 $57,169.20 $35,270.00 $53^334.91 $40,700.00 $41,791.23 $55,002.20 $42,057.00 $43,846.74 $40,670.00 $45,648.10 $41,791.23 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $49,270.00 $40,670.00 $61,000.00 $43,949.40 $43,597.62 $41,391.18 $41,250.96 $56,798.00 $37,787.85 $40^670.00 $40,670.00 ,$50,225.00 $40,670.00 $61,000.00 $47,122.00 $40,319.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $36,876.00 $43,846.74 $41,791.23' $57,169.20 $36,876.00 $40,670.00 $45,474.00 $41,728.54 $34,467.00 $60,292.00 $0.00 $0.00 $661.00 $0.00 $900.00 $6,720.00 $2,691.00 $2^064.00 $0.00 $2,064.00 $3,000.00 $0.00 $6,798.34 $2 J 89.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,400.00 $0.00 $1,200.00 $2,189.00 $661.00 $661.00 $0.00 $2,625.00 $9,458.44 $0.00 $0.00 $3,452.00 $0.00 $1,200.00 $2,400.00 $855.00 $0.00 $0.00 $8,126.20 $0.00 $430.00 $2,064.00 $7,375.20 $0.00 $3,706.00 $0.00 $6,893.40 $2,800.00 $40,670.00 $40,670,00 $48,744.14 $40,670.00 $58,069.20 $41,990 00 $56,025.91 $42,764.00 $41,791.23 $57,066.20 $45,057.00 $43,846.74 $47,468.34 $47,837.10 $41,791.23 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $51,670.00 $40,670.00 $62,200.00 $46,138.40 $44,258.62 $42,052.18 $41,250.96 $59,423.00 $47,246.29 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $53,677.00 $40,670.00 $62,200.00 $49,522.00 $41,174.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $45,002.20 $43,846.74 $42,221.23 $59,233.20 $44,251.20 $40,670.00 $49,180.00 $41,728.54 $41,360.40 $63,092.00 as of 2/22/94Employees Earning $40,000 or Above ELEANOR L HOLEMAN RUDOLPH HOWARD MARION A HOWEY MARY J HUDDLESTON ELOUISE J HUDSON SHELIA A HUDSON DONITA HUDSPETH MAC W HUFFMAN ANN J HURD STERLING INGRAM CHRiSTAL L ISOM MARGARET V ISUM DELORES S IVEY_______ EDWIN S JACKSON RUBY L JACKSON BRENDA F JAMES CHARLOTTE A JAMES EMOGENEBJAMES RITA A JAMES carol A JENNINGS ARTHURL JOHNSON CHARLIE JOHNSON GERALDINE A JOHNSON MAYREAN S JOHNSON WONDRUE M JOHNSON ANNA M JOINER-TATUM DORIS J JONES JACK A JONES MARY R JONES NANCY C JONES UNDA A KAMARA_______ CLEMENTINE KELLEY JOHN W KELLEY HELEN B KELLY A DOUGLAS KENDALL LINDA L KINDY JERI B KING TERRY G KIRKPATRICK ATRICIA A KOHLER TEACHER_____________ SECONDARY PRINCIPAL TEACHER "LIBRARIAN-JR_________ ASST PRINCIPAL SEC TEACHER DIR STAFF DEV________ ELEM PRINCIPAL - READING______________ ASSOC TO DPTY SUPT COUNSELOR-SEC LIBRARIAN-ELEM COUNSELOR-SEC "ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER ASST PRINCIPAL SEC TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER_____________ TEACHER NAVY_________________ TEACHER_____________ COUNSELOR-ELEM TEACHER TEACHER_____________ ASST PRINCIPAL ELEM TEACHER_____________ COUNSELOR-SEC TEACHER TEACHER______________ TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER_____________ TEACHER______________ EPA COORD ASST biR ADULT ED TEACHER TEACHER $42,116.22 $64,512.00 $48,083.14 $41,728.54 $40,303.00 $36,073.00 $55,093.00 $57,169.20 *____$40,670.00 $65,000.00 $41,105.52 $41,728.54 ____$43,846.74 $6 <456.00 $40,670.00 $37,815.00 $40,670.00 $40*670.00 $40,670.00 $43,846.74 $46,078.00 $32,118.00 KARIN S KVATERNIK MARIAN G LACEY JESSE J LACEY JR CHARLES H LANCE LAURA P LANDERS BERNICE W LANEY DIR SPECIAL ED TEACHER SECONDARY PRINCIPAL ASST PRINCIPAL ELEM TEACHER_____________ COUNSELOR-SEC COUNSELOR-ELEM $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $43,846.74 $45474?00 $40,383.63 $41,250.96 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $33,664.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $55,3K.6O $40,553 31 $46,18542 $47,438.82 $51,599.00 $40,670.00 $61,456.00 $46,576.00 $43,846.74 $48,083.14 $40,670.00 $0.00 $1,700.00 $1,611.00 $0.00 $1,640.00 $7,965.60 $900.00 $564.00 $0.00 $725.00 $750.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,625
00 $0.00 $2,432.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $9,226.20 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,731.00 $0.00 ___$0.00 $8,134.00 $751.00 $6,732.80 $0.00 $8,713.30 $0.00 $1,636.46 $0.00 $661.00 $2,650.01 $3,900.00 $0.00 $2,800.00 $3,452.00 $1,791.00 $750.00 $0.00 $42,116.22 $66,212.00 $49,694.14 $41,728.54 $42,143.00 $44,03860 $55,993.00 $57,733.20 $40,670.00 $65,725.00 $41,855.52 $41,726.54 $43,846.74 $65,061.00 $40,670.00 $40,247.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $43,846.74 $46,078.00 $41,346.20 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $43,846.74 $47,205.00 $40,383.63 $41,250.96 $46,804.00 $41,421.00 $40,396.80 $40,670.00 $49,363.30 $40,670.00 $57,002 06 $40,553.31 $46,646.42 $50,068.83 $55,499.00 $40,670.00 $64,256.00 $52,028 00 $45,637.74 $48,833.14 $40,67000 as of 2/22/94 1Employees Earning $40,000 or Above NANCY G LESLIE WILHELMINA E LEWELLEN JANICE LEWIS LEE E LEWIS____________ MARY R LOFTON Ladell looper TONALD N LOOPER DOROTHY J LOVELACE JULIA F LOYALL LUCY M LYON SUE MADDISON ANNE P MANGAN RICHARD L MAPLE JR WALTER A MARSHALECK BARBARA A MARTIN PAULETTE H MARTIN CASSANDRA N MASON JAMES D MATHEWS ESTELLE W MATTHIS JAMES L MATTHIS HAZEL L MAY____________ BONNIE B MAYBERRY C RUSSELL MAYO SHERRIE S MAYS HARRIETTE B MAZZANTI EDWINA Y MCCLURKAN ROBERT I MCDONALD THOMAS A MCDONALD SANDRA L MCFADDEN JUDY A MCGRATH LONA G MCKINNON JOANNE B MCLENDON "REDIE D MCLENNAN PATRICIA A MCMURRAY MARIE A MCNEAL PATRICIA A MCNEIL BARBARA W MEANS MARYAMENKING JUDITH L MILAM MARK D MILHOLLEN EMMAUNE C MILLER SUSAN P MILLER NANCY B MITCHELL SADIE M MITCHELL TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER________________ TEACHER ELEM PRINCIPAL__________ STAFF DEVELOPMENT TEACHER TEACHER________________ COORD LIB/INST TECH TEACHER ELEM PRINCIPAL SECONDARY PRINCIPAL___ SECONDARY PRINCIPAL TEACHER DIR ADULT ED ASST PRINCIPAL SEC TEACHER DEPUTY SUPT____________ ASST PRINCIPAL SEC COUNSELOR-SEC________ TEACHER________________ ASST SUPT - DESEG TEACHER TEACHER________________ TEACHER TEACHER________________ TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER______________ TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER ASSTPRINCIPAL SEC SOC STUDIES SUPERVISOR ELEM PRINCIPAL ELEM PRINCIPAL ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER________________ MGR SUPPORT SVCS TEACHER TEACHER________________ TEACHER ELLA M MOBLEY ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER $43,931.31 $40,670.00 ___$40,670.00 $40,670 00 $40,670.00 $48,503.40 $46,283.40 $41,791.23 ____$40,670.00 $43,895.32 $40,670.00 $49,585.80 ____$65,676.00 $45,151.00 $40,670.00 $46,754.51 $38,849.00 $43,846.74 $85,000.00 $48,576.00 $42,981.48 $40,383.63 $68,000.00 $45,236.56 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 ____$40,670.00 $39,064.00 $32,116.00 $39,193.38 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $43,597.62 $41,337.00 $45,648.10 $45,251.80 $44,169.40 $52,837.40 $40,670.00 $68000.00 $40,670.00 $36,676.00 $40,670.00 $45,251.60 $40,670.00 $661.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,064.00 $2,688.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,189.00 $751.00 $4,326.00 $2,300.00 $2,600.00 $0.00 $1,500.00 $1,640.00 $950.00 $1,200.00 $2,673.00 $0.00 $0.00 $895.00 $661.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,576.00 $9,003.60 $950.00 $0.00 ____$0.00 $661.00 $1,840.00 $669.00 $2,063.20 $2,380.00 $2,566.00 $0.00 $1,200.00 $0^00 $8,126.20 $0.00 $564.00 $0.00 $44,592.31 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $50,567.40 $50,971.40 $41,791.23 $40,670.00 $46,084,32 $41,421.00 $53,911.60 $67,976.00 $47,951.00 $40,670.00 $50,254.51 $40,669.00 $44,796.74 $66,200.00 $51,249.00 $42,981.48 $40,383.63 $68,895.00 $45,897.56 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,640.00 $41,121.60 $40,143.38 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $44,258.62 $43,177.00 $46,337.10 $47,315.00 $46,549.40 $55,403.40 $40,670.00 $69,200.00 $40,670.00 $45,002.20 $40,670.00 $45,615.80 $40,670.00 as of 2/22/94Employees Earning $40,000 or Above FLORA D MOLDEN__________ BRADFORD G MONTGOMERY FRANCILE MOORE SCOTT MORGAN WILUEC MORRIS JIMMY J MOSBY JOANNA M MOSLEY BETTY C MUENCH MARY L MURPHREE DIANA K NAGEL LOU E NAUDEN CHARLES A NEAL JOE A NIVEN BOBBIE J NORMAN LEOLA P NORMAN MICHAEL NORTON 4RTHUR C OLDS MICHAEL E OUVER JUDYKORINTAS MARTHA V PACE WILLIE PAIGE JR PATT J PARKER____________ GENE PARKER JR DAVID H PATTERSON ROSALIE T PATTON ANNITA C PAUL MARY J PEDIGO <ATHY PENN-NORMAN YORIKO U PERRITT MITCHELL PERRY________ MICHAEL W PETERSON EMMA J PEYTON DOROTHY A PHILUPS =^ATRICIA A PHILLIPS TABITHA L PHILLIPS FLORENE J PHIPPS SHIRLEY K PICKLE CELESTNE PIGGEE KRISTANNA D PITTENGER GAIl G PITTS JNDA M PORTER JAMES E POWELL TIS M PRESLAR MARY J PREWIT PATRICIA A PRICE TEACHER_____________ DIR TRANSPORTATON teacher ELEM PRINCIPAL ELEM PRINCIPAL >SST PRINCIPAL SEC JBRARIAN-SEC TEACHER COUNSELOR-SEC TEACHER TEACHER DIR PROCUREMENT SECONDARY PRINCIPAL TEACHER ____ TEACHER TEACHER ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER_____________ TEACHER TEACHER_____________ TEACHER ENGLISH SUPERVISOR >SST PRINCIPAL SEC TEACHER_____________ TEACHER TEACHER EVAL SPECIALIST TEACHER TEACHER_____________ >SST PRINCIPAL SEC TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER_____________ Asst PRINCIPAL elem TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER_____________ TEACHER_____________ IKSST PRINCIPAL SEC DOUNSELOR-SEC Asst PRINCIPAL sec ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER COORD EARLY CHILD $40,670.00 $49,501.00 $40,670.00 $40,093.00 $42,002.40 $42,371.00 $41,726.54 $40,670.00 $43,846.74 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $57,546.00 $57,524.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $4O
67O.OO $33,443.00 $49,585.80 $40,670.00 $40,670W $43,846.74 $43,846.74 $42,664.80 $42,371.00 $34,467.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,303.00 $40,670.00 $44,341.44 $41,951.00 $43,846.74 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $37,200.00 $40,670.00 $35,270.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $36,234.00 $42,637.32 $50,225.00 $57,169.20 $40,670.00 $60,292.00 $0.00 $900.00 $0.00 $563.20 $564.00 $340.00 ____$0.00 $0.00 ____$0.00 ____$0.00 $0.00 $2,179.00 $2,400.00 ____WW $751.00 $0.00 $6,688.60 $2,064.00 $0.00 $0.00 $950.00 $751.00 $2,189.00 $340.00 $6,693.40 $0.00 $0.00 $751.00 $0.00 $0.00 $452.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,052.00 $500.00 $7,054.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,342.00 $750.00 $5,665.27 $2,064.00 $0.00 $2,400.00 $40,670.00 $50,401.00 $40,670 00 $40,656.20 $42,566.40 $42,711.00 $41,728.54 $40,670.00 $43,846.74 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $59,725.00 $59,924.00 $40,670.00 $41,421.00 $40,670.00 $40,131.60 $51,649.80 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $44,796.74 $44,597.74 $45,053.80 $42,711.00 $41,360.40 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $41,054.00 $40,670.00 $44,341.44 $42,403.00 $43,846.74 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,252.00 $41,170.00 $42,324.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,576.00 $43,387.32 $56,090 27 $59,233.20 $40,670.00 $62,692.00 as of 2/22/94Employees Earning $40,000 or Above H. D, PRUETT BEVERLY A RALEY CATHERINE M RAND SUSAN D RAYMOND ELUS E REGISTER________ LUCYLRHODES DPAL E RICE LEAH A RILEY CHARLES J RIPLEY JR LAYMOR B ROBERTS JR AUDRON S ROBERTSON LARRY S ROBERTSON CONSTANCE F ROBINSON JOHN H ROBINSON */ERA L ROBINSON SHIRLEY A ROLAX SHYREL D ROSE__________ PAULA D RYNDERS_______ DORIS L SARVER DOROTHY D SCHEIBNER BRENDA LYNN SCRIMAGER DARRELL L SEWARD GENEVA S SHELLS CHERYL A SIMMONS" J C SKIPPER_____________ CHARITY O SMITH GARY S SMITH TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER izAULJ SMITH PAULA M SMITH PHYLLIS A SMITH WILLIAM O SMITH ^/ERNON SMITH JR EVELYN H SOO CHARLES S SPRINGER DANNY W STEELE MARY L STEELMAN SARA J STEPHENS ALICE S STOVALL STANTON L STRAUSS ROYCE C STROUD BRENDA J STUCKEY SAM J STU EART CLAYTON L TAYLOR FRANCES D TAYLOR CAROLYN F TEETER COUNSELOR-VOC TEACHER_____________ COUNSELOR-ELEM TEACHER TEACHER_____________ TEACHER_________ TEACHER UBRARIAN-SEC_______ ASST SUPT - ELEM TEACHER_____________ ASST PRINCIPAL SEC ASST PRINCIPAL ELEM TEACHER SUP SPED COORD GIFTED & TAL UBRARIAN-ELEM TEACHER DIR COMM SCHOOL TEACHER_____________ TEACHER ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER SECONDARY PRINCIPAL SPEC CBI EVAL SPECIAUST TEACHER TEACHER_____________ TEACHER_____________ ASST PRINCIPAL SEC TEACHER yOC COORD__________ TEACHER SP COORD TEACHER DIR ASST PRINCIPAL ELEM TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER____________ TEACHER TEACHER____________ ELEM PRINCIPAL $40,670,00 $40,670,00 $40,670,00 $40,383,63 $36,876 00 $40,670,00 $40,670,00 $40,670,00 $36,876,00 $43,846,74 $41,728,54 $61,000,00 $43,846,74 $45,054,00 $40,303,00 $40,670,00 $40,155,61 $44,548,71 $41,728,54 $40,670,00 ____$40,255,20 $36,354,00 $40,670,00 $50,975,00 ____$31,165,92 $49,810,00 $39,958,52 $49,387,81 $43,846,74 $42,116,22 $40,670,00 $50,225,00 $45,964,94 $47,189,03 ____$45,829,03 ____$44,958.41" $40,670,00 $53,928,00 $47
418,80 $43,8^,74 $43,597,62 $40,670,00 $40,383,63 $40,670,00 $48,503,40 $0,00 $0,00 $0,00 $0,00 $6,749,90 $0,00 $0,00 $0,00 $3,616,00 $0,00 $0,00 $1,200,00 $0,00 $452,00 $1,731,00 $0,00 $2,189,00 $2,189,00 _____$0 00 $0,00 $1,740,00 $5,706,10 $0,00 $3,625,00 $8,933,82 $2,300,00 $2,100,00 $3,751,00 $0,00 $751,00 $0,00 $1,951,50 $656,00 $340,00 $1,412,00 $2,126,00 $0,00 $2,900,00 $4
32660 $12,568,58 $1,091,00 $0,00 $10,407,88 $0,00 $2,064,01 $40,670,00 $40,670,00 $40,670,00 $40,383,63 $43,625,90 $40,670,00 $40,670,00 $40,670,00 $40,692,00 $43,846,74 $41,728,54 $62,200,00 $43,646,74 $45,506,00 $42,034,00 $40,670,00 $42,344,61 $46,737,71 $41,728,54 $40,670,00 $41,995,20 $42,060,10 $40,670,00 $54,600,00 $40,099,74 $52,110,00 $42,056,52 $53,138,81 $43,846,74 $42,867,22 $40,670,00 $52,176,50 $46,622,94 $47,529,03 $47,241,03 $47,084,41 $40,670,00 $56,628,00 $51,744,60 $56,415,32 $44,668,62 $40,670,00 $50,791,51 $40,670,00 $50,567,41 as of 2/22/94Employees Earning $40,000 or Above DHARLOTTE A TEETER JUDY S TEETER HELEN J THOMAS MICHAEL C THOMAS SHI RLEY A THOMAS NANCY K THOMPSON =EGGYS"THOMPSON BEVERLY "BTH^SHER______ BARBARA "N THRONEBERRY LINDA E TODD SAMMIE N TOLLETTE JUDITH TROWELL MARILYN E TURNER__________ JOYCE M UNDERWOOD ANDREW P VANECKO GLORIA O VENABLE BOY L WADE JEANETTE WAGNER ARDELIA A, WALKER CHERRIE D'WALKER ELLA M WALKER_____________ MILDRED J WALKER COLLEEN S WALLS LIONEL WARD JAMES L WASHINGTON BILLY N WATSON Cl^UDlA G WATSON GLADYSTINE WATSON Linda WATSON MARYLEE R WATSON CLELL WATTS BECKY S WEBB CECIL H WEBB JR VERA WELLER DAISY M WHEELER GLORIA A WHITE SUZANNE D WHITE NONA M WHITTAKER HENRY P WILLIAMS JOYCE YWILUAMS ROGER N WILUAMS EULAMWILUS GLORIA P WILSON LEVANNA M WILSON TEACHER_____________ TEACHER ^SST PRINCIPAL ELEM TEACHER_____________ TEACHER_____________ 'TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER"__________' TEACHER LIBRARIAN-JR MATH SUPERVISOR "TEACHER "TEACHER "TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER_____________ DIR COMMUNICATIONS TEACHER ^SST PRINCIPAL SEC "TEACHER_____________ TEACHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ELEM PRINCIPAL IKSST PRINCIPAL SEC TEACHER "TEACHER TEACHER HEARING OFFICER TEACHER SECONDARY PRINCIPAL TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER TEACHER_____________ SUPERINTENDENT TEACHER >SST PRINCIPAL SEC TEACHER_____________ TEACHER JANE A WINSTON ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER |$40,670.00 |$40,670.00 $45,474.00 $36,763.00 ___$40,670.00 $43,846.74 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670 66 $40,670.00 $41,726.54 $53,334.91 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $43,846.74 $38,763.00 $40,682.00 $40,670.00 $38,849.00 $43,846.74 $38,763.00 $47,196.80 $52,637.40 $39,883.00 $40,670.00 $43,646.74 $43,646.74 $61,000.80 $48,083.14 $61,456.00 $40,670.00 $46,083.14 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 ' $115,000.00 $40,670.00 $48,576.00 $41,791.23 $40,670.00 $47,418.80 $40,670 00 ____$0.00 $0.00 $1,731.00 $2,90300 $0.00 $500.00 ____$0.00 ____$0.00 $0 00 $0.00 $0.00 $401.66 $0.00 $0.00 ____$0.00 ____$0.00 $8,277.35 $666.00 ____$0.00 $1,952.00 $1,251.00 $6,503.60 $689.00 $2,064.00 $6,135.50 $751.00 $0.00 $0.00 $900.00 $3,312.00 $2,300.00 $0.00 $661.00 $0.00 $0.00 ____SOW $0.00 $0.W $0.00 $0.00 $1,840.00 $750.00 $0.00 $2^566.00 $0.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $47,205.00 $41,666.00 $40,670.00 $44,346.74 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $41,728.54 $53,736,57 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $43,646.74 $47,040.35 $41,370.00 $40,670.00 $40,801.00 $45,097.74 $47,266.60 $47,687.60 $54,901.40 $46,018.50 $41,421.00 $43,846.74 $43,6^.74 $61,900.80 $51,395.14 $63,756.00 $40,670.00 $46,744.14 $40^670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $40,670.00 $115,000.00 $40,670.00 $50,416.00 $42,541.23 $40,670.00 $49,984.80 $40,670.00 as of 2/22/94Employees Earning $40,000 or Above CRYSTAL A WOOD MARION E WOODS MAUD E WOODS WILLIE L WOODS JERRY P WORM TEACHER____________ STAFF DEVELOPMENT ASST PRINCIPAL SEC ASST PRINCIPAL SEC ELEM PRINCIPAL ROBERT B WRIGHT LINDA I YOUNG GWENDOLYN S ZEIGLER JUDY R ZINK COUNSELOR-SEC NEW FUTURES ELEM PRINCIPAL TEACHER $40,670.00 $43,949.40 $50,225.00 $48,576.00 $53,919.80 $43,846.74 $48,750.03 $50,668.20 $41,791.23 $0.00 $2,070.81 $452.00 $1,840.00 $2,064.00 $0.00 $2,400.01 $2,064.00 $0.00 $40,670.00 $46,020.21 $50,677.00 $50,416.00 $55,983.80 $43,646.74 $51,150.04 $52,732.20 $41,791.23 as of 2/22/94To: Ann From: Polly MEMO Subject: Comparing LRSD Organizational Charts Date: February 27, 1994 In comparing the April 1993 organization chart (Mac Bernd) to the February 1995 chart (Hank Williams), I have two summaries for your review. Attachment A (^) and Attachment B (5). Because I have gone as far as I can with inhouse resources, I stopped here for you to review the data and decide whether to proceed to the next step, which would be to call LRSD and request salary information. A and B are two different approaches to comparing the organizational charts: A is a simple fact-to-fact comparison
whereas B breaks down and analyzes the changes in the organizational charts. A needs very little explanation
whereas, B has several areas that need additional explanation. A does not have a bottom line because of the limited inhouse resources
B does have a bottom line. Both have merits
however, if LRSD chose to do so, B is one way they could argue that little change has occurred in the organizational charts. Attachment A: The first column lists all positions from both organizational charts. The next four columns tell the name of the person holding the position and their salary. Shading notes if a position was not listed on that particular organizational chart. The rest of the chart is self explanatory. Most of the salary information used in this chart is 2/22/94 information, which should not have changed much because LRSD issued only step increases for 1994-95. Attachment B: This summary notes the changes between the two organizational charts, the net loss or gain of employees, and the net loss or gain of those employees salaries. Some of the changes are really clear as to whether they are an addition or deletion. However, some are not easily categorized. One change you need to note is on the first page about 2/3 down from the top, regarding Reading, Language Arts, etc. The net loss of salaries shows the salary of Alice Stovall and Dianne Wood when they retired, not in April 1993
probably not a lot of difference, but some. Also, if Hank plans to replace Alice and Diane, then no loss would show
but Hanks chart does not list TBA for those positions. The last row on the first page, regarding Mark Milhollen, shows a change with no net loss or gain. Although Mark received a large salary increase between April 1993 and February 1995, the organizational charts only reflect a change in title.Comparing LRSD Organizational Charts February 27, 1995 Page 2 On the second page, the second row down, regarding Catherine Gill, shows a net loss of one employee with a salary of $22,965. As far as the organizational chart, this change is a Move with no net loss or gain. However, Catherine Gill actually replaced Annie Abrams as the PAC Coordinator. Although Annie was not on Macs chart, LRSD lost an employee because of this change. The next row down shows a net loss of one employee, Arma Hart, with a salary of $54,232. Although Arma received a large salary increase a short time after April 1993, the chart reflects Armas salary in April 1993. Summary/Recommendation: If A was complete so that a bottom line was drawn, it would show a greater difference between organizational charts than B shows, mainly, however, because of salary increasesnot because of additional administrators. If the Legal Services position is filled and Reading and Mathematics supervisors are hired, then Hanks chart would be top heavy. At this time though, neither A nor B shows that Hank has more administrators than Bernd had in April 1993. I can continue on and request the additional salary information from LRSD, getting them involved, or we can file this information for later reference in case Hank wants to hire a Legal Services person or additional administrators. I recommend that we file the information for later reference, because at this time I do not see a significant development from continuing this approach. Just let me know the direction you wish to take.Attachment A COMPARISON BETWEEN APRIL 1993 AND FEBRUARY 1995 ORGANIZATIONAL CHARTS Positions April 1993 February 1995 Name Salary Name Salary Superintendent Deputy Superintendent Communications Human Resources Labor Relations Special Assistant to Supt Legal Services Information Services Business Systems Student Systems Assoc Supt Org & Learn Equity Associate Supt Desegregation Assoc Supt Sch Oper & Climate Assoc Supt Curr & Learn Imp Associate to Deputy Supt Manager Res & Sch Support Effective Schools Student Assignment Monitoring & Implem/Deseg Plan Planning & Evaluation Grants Writer VIPS CARE Parent Recruitment Parent Coordinator Hearing Officer Incentive Schools Assistant Supt-Elem Assistant Supt-Elem Assistant Supt-Sec Principals Teachers Mac Bernd 110,000. Hank Williams 115,000. WA N/A Estelle Matthis 86,200. Jeanette Wagner Brady Gadberry N/A N/A Dave Kingsella N/A Marie Parker N/A Janet Benard Estelle Matthis N/A Gary Jones Responsibility only Responsibility only Arma Hart Sterling Ingram N/A Debbie Milan Martha Rodgers Julie Weidower Catherine Gill Rudolph Howard Responsibility oniyi Margaret Gremillion Larry Robertson Sam Stuart Responsibility onlyi ResfXMieibitity only 40,080. 62,764. N/A N/A 57,365. N/A 65,000. N/A 68,900. 65,000. N/A 65,000 N/A N/A. 54,232. 60,292. N/A N/A 55,120. 50,128 N/A N/A Suellen Vann Richard Hurley Brady Gadberry Leon Modeste TBA David Beason Responsibiirty only Responsibiirty only N/A Russ Mayo N/A N/A Sterling Ingram Fred Smith N/A ResponsbiMy only N/A Robert Glowers Marvin Schwartz Debbie Milan ' Not charts Becky Rather N/A Larry Robertson ResponsfeiWy only Margaret Gremillion Sadie Mitchell Dennis Snider Responsibility only iResponsbitrtyonlyi 40,682. 73,000. 65,747. 53,000. 57,135. N/A N/A 68,895. N/A N/A 65,725. 68,000 ' N/Ai .N/Ai N/A , 53,000. 49,501. N/A '- N/A 62,200. " N/A 62,200. N/A N/AI ' New Futures Linda Young Linda Young 51,150. Athletics i Responsibility only i Responsibility only Alternative Learning Othello Faison Walter Marshaleck 47,951. Reading Alice Stovall 53,928.* Gene Parker 45,054. Language Arts Gene Parker Gene Parker Foreign Language Gene Parker Science Dennis Glasgow Dennis Glasgow 56,026. Math Dianne Wood 50,225.* Dennis Glasgow Social Studies Marie McNeal Marie McNeal 46,337. Fine Arts Res^slbilfty only i N/A Responsibility only Ist/A Music NQitdia,rt6d N/A Instructional Technology Responsibility onlyi N/A ^Responsibility only! I^A Physical Education Responaibtiity only
N/A ^Responsibility only! N/A Drug & Health Education Jo Evelyn Elston N/A W Pupil Services N/A N/A Jo Evelyn Elston 60,987. Early Childhood Pat Price Pat Price 62,692. Staff Development Marvin Zimmerman Marion Woods 46,020. HIPPY Not charted N/A Marian Shead Vocational Carol Green Carol Green 51,670. Federal Prog ram s/G rants Leon Adams Leon Adams 63,192. Exceptional Children Patty Kohler Patty Kohler 55,499. Adult Education Paulette Martin Paulette Martin 50,255. Library Services Lucy Lyon Lucy Lyon 46,084. Parent Involvement Not charted N/A Catherine Gill 58,069. Controller Mark Milhollen N/A N/A Financial Services N/A N/A Mark Milhollen 69,200. Facilities Services Doug Eaton Doug Eaton 58,335. Food Services Jackie Boykin 55,216. Jackie Anderson 51,492. Procurement Charlie Neal 56,880. Charlie Neal 59,725. Security/Risk Management Bill Barnhouse Bobby Jones Transportation Brad Montgomery Mary Jane Cheatham 58,651. Total * Salary at time of retirement (1993-94)Attachment B Comparison between April 1993 and February 1995 Organizational Charts Below is the breakdown describing how the April 1993 organizational chart differs from the February 1995. From the April 1993 organization chart. Hank Williams: Action Net Loss or Gain of Employees Net Loss or Gain of Base Salary Added: Special Assistant to Superintendent, Leon Modeste Legal Services, TBA Separated: Labor Relations/Human Resources, Brady Gadberry into Labor Relations, Brady Gadberry Human Resources, Dr. Richard Hurley Combined: Assoc Supt School Operations & Climate, Janet Bernard Assoc Supt Curriculum & Learning Imp, Estelle Matthis into Deputy Superintendent, Estelle Matthis then added Associate to Deputy Superintendent, Sterling Ingram Combined: Language Arts, Gene Parker Foreign Language, Gene Parker into Language Arts/Foreign Language, Gene Parker Combined: Reading, Language Arts, Foreign Language from two supervisors to one supervisor Science and Mathematics from two supervisors to one supervisor Changed: Drug & Health Education, Jo Evelyn Elston to Pupil Services, Jo Evelyn Elston Changed: Controller, Mark Milhollen to Financial Services, Mark Milhollen +2 +1 0 0 -1 -1 0 0 +53,000 +??? +73,000 +18,000 0 -53,928 -50,225 0 0Moved: Information Services, Dave Kingseila, from under Manager Resources & School Support 0 0 to answering directly to Superintendent then added under Information Services, David Beason Business Systems Student Systems Removed: Parent Coordinator, Catherine Gill -1 -22,965 Added: Parent Involvement, Catherine Gill (new to chart-replaced the PAC Coordinators position) Removed: Effective Schools, program only Monitoring & Implementation/Deseg Plan, Arma Hart -1 -54,232 CARE (Removed from chart only-position still exists.) Added: HIPPY, Marian Shead (new to chart only-existed previously) 0 0 Moved: Communications, Jeanette Wagner, from answering directly to Supt 0 0 to under Assoc Supt Deseg (Suellen Vann) Added Grants Writer, Man/in Schwartz +1 +49,501 Moved: Hearing Officer, Rudolph Howard, from under Assoc Supt 0 0 to under Assoc to Deputy Supt (Larry Robertson) Total 0 +12,154 + Legal ServicesPersonnel Changes Page 5 April 28, 1994 Name Position School Effective Date Salary Class Annual Salary Bynum, Tyrone Furrer, Glenda Greene, Gregory Harris, Kyan Hunkins, Jeffery Jackson, Kenneth Oliver, Stephanie Roberts, Cindy L. Roston, Casandra Schwartz, Marvin New Non-Certified Employees Bus Driver Transportation Food Service Carver Custodian Cloverdale JH Bus Driver Transportation Bus Driver Transportation Custodian Central Bus Driver Transportation Food Service Pulaski Hghts JH Bus Driver Transportation Grant Writer Administration 2/25/94 3/10/94 3/14/94 2/16/94 3/03/94 4/04/94 2/28/94 3/15/94 2/19/94 05/23/94 3-10 BUSDRV $ 37.14 per day 1-01 FSHRLY 1-02 CUSTDL 3-10 BUSDRV 3-10 BUSDRV 1-01 CUSTDL 3-10 BUSDRV 1-01 FSHRLY 3-10 BUSDRV 6-09 ADMNC $ 6.41 per hour $ 5.77 per hour $ 37.14 per day $ 37.14 per day $ 5.57 per hour $ 37.14 per day $ 6.41 per hour $ 37.14 per day $49,501.00 $ 5,568.75 (PR)I Personnel Changes Page 8 December 15, 1994 h NAME POSITION SCHOOL EFFECTIVE DATE SALARY CLASS ANNUAL SALARY I I I I i Hunter, Sheila Johnson, Gloria McKey, Wendell McTyer, Devonda Mitchell, Eric Nutt, Dorothy Phillips, Anthony Ray, Dwight Reece, Curtis Rodgers, Pakita Smith, Freddie Superv Aide DODD Custodian MCCLELLAN Custodian MANN Food Service MABELVALE JR Bus Driver TRANS Custodian PUL HGTS JR Bus Driver TRANS Custodian ROCKEFELLER Bus Driver TRANS Custodian HALL Manager-Finan RESOURCES & 11-07-94 10-31-94 10-31-94 11-01-94 10-18-94 10-31-94 11-03-94 10-31-94 10-10-94 10-20-94 12-15-94 SUPPORT SERVICES 1-01 SVA5 1-01 CUS925 1-01 CUS925 1-01 FSH5 3-01 BUSDRV 1-01 CUS925 3-01 BUSDRV 1-01 CUS925 3-10 BUSDRV 1-01 CUS925 11-01 AUNC12 CA 4.70 per hr 5.57 per hr 5.57 per hr 6.41 per hr 42.54 per day 5.57 per hr 42.54 per day 5.57 per hr 37.14 per day 5.57 per hr 68000.00 annual 36992.00 prorated . 1200.00 annual 652.80 proratedRECEIVE?) SEP 2 9 1995 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENTS OFFICE 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Office of Desegrogaitwi Date: September 27, 1995 To: Ann Brown, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring From: i 11 i^^m^^upehntei^ Superintendent Re: LRSD Organizational Chart The position that has been questioned, which appears on the new organizational chart, is one that was originally proposed for Estelle Matthis. This position was suggested prior to her decision to take long-term sick leave and ultimately retire once her accumulated sick leave and vacation time have been exhausted. As a reminder, I indicated in court that once I had the opportunity to evaluate the Districts needs, I would make some recommendations to the Board as to how I would reorganize the area of curriculum and instruction and what positions might be required. I have now had the opportunity to consider the needs of the District in this area and I believe that a position is needed. Once a business case has been developed it will be forwarded to you as a matter of course to be shared with appropriate parties and for the Court records. Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call.(3//^ CyMrJ) RECEiV^l5 SEP 2 9 1995 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENTS OFFICE 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Offics of DesegregatiOfi Date: September 27, 1995 To: Ann Brown, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring From: I i^in^^uperintei^i Superintendent Re: LRSD Organizational Chart The position that has been questioned, which appears on the new organizational chart, is one that was originally proposed for Estelle Matthis. This position was suggested prior to her decision to take long-term sick leave and ultimately retire once her accumulated sick leave and vacation time have been exhausted. As a reminder, I indicated in court that once I had the opportunity to evaluate the Districts needs, I would make some recommendations to the Board as to how I would reorganize the area of curriculum and instruction and what positions might be required. I have now had the opportunity to consider the needs of the District in this area and I believe that a position is needed. Once a business case has been developed it will be forwarded to you as a matter of course to be shared with appropriate parties and for the Court records. Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call...T LI M - 0 5 - 9 e. WED ? : O 1 P . O 1 Southujcst Office Supplies i Senice * Convenieccs * SeiecdOQ 4723 Base Lins Road Linis Rock, AR 72209 (501)562-6621 FAX (501)562-2466 FAX COVER SHEET DATE
TIME: TO: # CALLED
FROM: : 4 TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: ~r IF THERE ARE ANY PROBLEMS RECEIVING TRANSMISSION, PLEASE CALL (501)562-6621 REMARKS: rJ LI N - 0 kJ E n 05 0 1 F' , 0 2 Witnessing the submission of the reorganization plan to the School .Board last Thursday night was one of the most iiTesponsibie actions of the superintendent that has been done lately. Not surprisingly, he tried to persuade the Board to approve the plan without a great deal of discussion or explanation Tills plan is a major play by two, maybe tluee players. The players include Dr. Williams, Brady Gadberry, and perhaps Linda Young. None of these people actually know what the staff of the curriculum departments have done or attempted to do in our schools. Dr. Williams seldom goes to the IRC to discuss issues dealing with the curriculum, or has .Brady Gadbeny made it Iris objective to find out what goes on in the schools. Is he even qualified? Does being principal of a junior Irigh make him an expert in curriculum? Does being a Labor Relations Director make him an expert? I don't think so. Yet, he has placed himself as Assistant Superintendent of Curriculum. 1 wonder what he knows about the National or State Frameworks for Math, Science, Social Studies, English, or Reading. What does he know about integrating the curriculum and making it applicable for our students today? Since his illness has often sidelined him for long periods of time, I wonder what he knows about these topics or what goes on in our schools. Linda Young has been made a Director. What exactly does her duties as a Director of New Futures include? The Special Assistant to the Superintendent will be placed under her jurisdiction to do what duties? Tliis seems to be a lofty title for someone who was liired as a liaison for a special giant program only nine years ago. Does planning a reception tor the superintendent and solicting funds for the party deserve being named a director? Serving on committees and advising the superintendent seems to go a long way. Does working in four junior high schools and organizing the teaming approach for these junior high schools deserve the title of a Director? Someone seems to think so. When does dedication to schools and qualification for the job count? How has she worked with the curriculum people in reorganinzing the schools? Communication with most of the supervisors has been very limited. Gene Parker has seemed to be the only supervisor who has worked with her. Where does he fit into the structure? Word has it that he may resign since he was not placed in a Itigh position. Sour grapes??? He is allowed to "do Ins work at home" since the stress of the District bothers him. Ooooo, nice perks for someone who seems so tempermental at times. How cooperative a player is he? Whose team is he playing for? He often doesnt show for meetings at the time set by the group and wants the time changed for his convenience. disjointidness. This seemed to an area of It seems as if responsibilities for the curriculum, the central theme of our schools, is getting left out of the whole plan. No one from the upper level of the administration has made it their task to find out what is going on in the trenches. Margaret GremiUion, Sadie Mitchell, and Vic Anderson are in the schools almost everyday. Ask them how much the curriculum staff works in the schools
ask the principals who haved asked for assistance. A comment which was included in the nanative of the business case states that 'the efforts of the present structure of the curriculum is disjointed." I wonder how any one would know that as a fact. How much communication has been done with all the,instructional supervisors or the specialists who are in the schools on a daily basis? What discussion has. TIJ N - 0 5 WED P . 0 3 taken place with the principals who requested assistance or the teachers who have been helped? Staff development has been orchestrated by the various curriculum departments. This inservice has been the best in the state. No other school district in this state has specialists who can deliver inservice like the teachers in our district are receiving. Other districts must rely on coop stalT or other paid consultants. Our needs as the largest and most integrated District in the state are special. Did any of the upper level stafl' see, hear, or participate in this training? No, I don't tliink so. Tliis staff development was done with a dedicated staff that planned and conducted the inservice with the liighest level of professionalism. Teachers were provided with instruction, supplies, and guidance. Where else in this State could this much preparation be done and instruction be delivered? Planning was done jointly and cooperatively. All areas of the curriculum were Involved. Dividing the instructional staff' up will be detrimental to continued joint planning. Will the current assistant superintendents continue to oversee the everyday operation of their schools, as well meet with the curriculum teams assigned to tliem, plan curriculum inservice, and advise building level administrators? Nothing was etcplained in the plan as to how or who would supervise, advise, or oversee the teams other than just saying they would operate under an assistant superintendent. Would the curriculum department still remain intact or would these teams by split up and placed in different areas? How can, or will, joint planning take place? Who will be placed on these teams? What personnel will be cut or moved'? Nothing has been explained. Does the "appointed" assistant superintendent in charge of curriculum know about the strategies that have been implemented in our schools? Not since Dennis Glasgow worked as acting" assistant superintendent for curricuiura has the instructional staff felt as if they were a pan of the school district. Issues were discussed openly, decisions were made jointly, no secrets were discussed behind closed doors, and efforts were made to do the best tilings for the students and the school district. Maybe this is why Dr. Williams removed Mr. Glasgow from this position. Integrity and honesty apparently count for nothing in the eyes of our superintendent. I guess qualifications aren't worth much either, since Mr. Glasgow has the credentials needed to fulfill the position of an assistant superintendent for curriculum. I hope the Board takes a long and hard look at the reorganizational structure that Dr. Williams is proposing. If his contract is bought out by the Board, his structure should not be put in place for someone else to reorganize. Confusion and a feeling of being unsettled would exist again in our District. Should the superintendent and/or Board have some discussion with the staff and other people who will be affected by this plan? This Distiict has some 25,000 students that will be affected by this reorganization. Is this the best tiling for our District? It seems that cutting some of the top administration would address cutting the Special Assistant to the Superintendent and some of the Director level positions. Most of the instructional staff are teachers, working at the same salary level of the teachers in the district. Moving the instructional staff as a curriculum team under an assistant superintendent does cut cost. Many people do not realize that most of the peopleJ LI H - O 5 WED O 3 F' . 0 4 at the tRC are not on administration level contracts. These people work longer hours than most classroom teachers and are paid as a teacher. The Board asked the superintedent to make cuts as tar away from the students as possible, but making certain people directors and retaining special assistants does cut away from the students. Our students benefit from the specialists going into the classrooms because they get special programs, and their teachei s get on the job training in the latest techniques in teaching strategies. Check into the creditials of the specialists in our District. Most of them are award winning teachers, on the state and national level, who have continued their special training to enrich their education and provide better service for our students and our District, It seems as if the superintendent must have something to hide since he wanted this plan approved so quickly. What is Iris underlying message? 'Does he want some of liis special" people placed in "special" places before he leaves? Most of the Board doesn't seem surprised at this action. Is tills another one of his actions which may prove deadly to our District? Does he even care? How much has he cared about our District since he came here? Lip service doesn't show concern. The fact that this will be discussed and possibly voted on at a luncheon meeting next Thursday frightens most teachers. This should be done at a regular session. He says he has done what he was hired to do, get us out of court. He hasn't done that. He is riding on the coat tails of the people in the trenches who have worked with our students for many years. Who has done the ultimate work in the schools? Surely he doesn't think he has, How many davs has he spent in the schools since he was hired compared to the number of days he has spent looking for another job? Making token visits to a school does not help one understand what is being done on a day to day basis. Let him teach in a junior high class for a week, see the new strategies used in an elementary classroom, or do a hands-on activity in a liigh school class. He needs to understand that it has taken many people and many years to get out of coun. Tliis District needs a leader who cares about ail facets of learning, visits with the staff, takes a true interest in the community, is not afraid to listen and imderstand, not one who acts so arrogant and oblivious to the needs of the entire community, Verbiase doesn't become action unless the person is truly dedicated to making this school district the best in the State. Our students and teachers deserve the best! had the best that someone has to offer! We all wish that we1 1990 J BOARD OF DIRECTORS SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Special Assistant Labor Relations Communications Technology Administrative Services School Services Instruction I Operations Discipline Alternative Education Student Assignment Pupil Services Human Resources chart 04*23-98 Elementary Assistant Secondary Assistant^ Accelerated Learning Athletics Reading/Language Arts Mathemalics/Science Social Studies Stall Development HIPPY Career & Technical Adult Education Early Childhood Planning/Research/Evaluation Exceptional Children Grants Writer New Futures Federal Programs Parent Involvement VIPS Financial Servicesv**^ Internal Auditor Procurement Plant Services Safety/Security Child Nutrition Transportation LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT INSTRUCTIONAL RESOURCE CENTER 3001 PULASKI STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72206 June 28, 1999 TO: John Walker, Attorney at Law FROM: SUBJECT: RECEIVED JUN 3 0 1999 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORIMG Dr. Bonnie Lesley, Associate Superintendent for Instruction Your Request for Organization Chart There have been several drafts of a proposed reorganization plan for the Division of Instruction. One draft was distributed to the staff at a meeting on Thursday, June 17. After their feedback, I made some changes and sent out another draft on Friday, June 18. As I told you, the plan is very much still a draft document and I have made several minor changes since then, a couple after a brief meeting with Dr. Carnine at the end of last week. I am attaching a hard copy of the most recent draft that I have sent to Dr. Carnine. Keep in mind that more changes are likely to occur as we receive more input and think about it. I also have a copy of this latest draft on a disk that you may pick up at my office at your convenience. You may certainly compare the hard copy with what is on my computer, but again, we are changing it almost daily. BAL/adg Attachment cc: Dr. Les Carnine Junious Babbs Brady Gadberry Chris Heller, Esq. Clay Fendly, Esq. zXnn Brown, ODM Reorganization Proposal, June 1999 Division of Instruction, Little Rock School District This proposal to reorganize the Division of Instruction is informed by the following: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. A one-year observation and study of the performance of existing staff, their strengths and interests
An identification of gaps in current staffing, leaving several key areas without designated leadership
An analysis of "the work" to be done, as per the Strategic Plan, the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan, the Campus Leadership Plan, Title I, ACSIP, the NSF Project, and Smart Start
Experience in other urban school districts and reorganizations in those districts
Study of recommendations coming from organizations emphasizing quality management principles, teaming, and providing support and services for internal customers (e.g., schools)
Recommendations from the AA(5T Study presented to the Board of Education in March 1999. The current organizational chart has several weaknesses
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. There are too many people reporting directly to the Associate Superintendent for efficient and effective management
People are organized according to function, not in multi-disciplinary teams required to do the work identified in the District priorities
The current organization does not address the needs to support Campus Leadership teams, to provide coordinated planning, to provide coordinated and targeted technical assistance for school improvement, to coordinate elementary/middle/high school curriculum decisions, etc.
Several people are not in the jobs where they can do their best work and make their most positive contributions
Current organization contributes to a lack of coherent, consistent, aligned decisions in some areas. 1Proposal The following proposal organizes the entire staff of the Division of Teaching and Learning (formerly the Division of Instruction) into multi-disciplinary teams to which the Work Plan Priorities will be assigned in 1999-2000. Instead of each team reporting directly to the Associate Superintendent, some will report to her through team leaders and some through team leaders under the Assistant Superintendent. Although the staff may continue to work in current departments and in current assigned space (to avoid cost and the loss of significant amounts of time required to move offices), the bulk of their work and energy will be with their newly assigned teams. The plan is transitional. In two-three years the Division should again be reorganized, shifting more and more staff to roles more directly supportive of school improvement. There should also be some reductions in the need for central staff at that time. Further, as positions become vacant, each one should be evaluated to determine its future need and whether it is at the appropriate level. The following teams shall be established directly under the Associate Superintendent: PreK-12 Curriculum/Instruction Team (Team Leaders to be Assigned According to Tasks) Dennis Glasgow, Director of Mathematics and Science Vanessa Cleaver, Director of NSF Project Marie McNeal, Director of Social Studies Gene Parker, Director of Secondary English Language Arts Patricia Price, Director of Early Childhood and Elementary Literacy TBN, Coordinator of ESL and Foreign Language Carol Green, Director of Career and Technical Education Patty Kohler, Director of Exceptional Children Mable Donaldson, Supervisor of Gifted/Talented Education Leon Adams, Director of Federal Programs TBN, Coordinator of Fine Arts Ray Gillespie, Physical Education 2Lucy Lyon, Director of Libraries/Media Centers and Instructional Technology Barbara Barners, Special Education Supervisor Susan Chapman, Special Education Supervisor Note: According to need, especially for planning curriculum implementation, thematic curriculum, and professional development, teams for elementary, middle, and high school will be formed to include members of the PreK-12 Curriculum/Instruction Team, as well as others from other teams. Also, curriculum audit teams will be formed as schools are identified for sanctions to include members of the Curriculum/Instruction Team, building-level representatives, and representatives from the School Improvement Department. Planning and Development Linda Young, Director of Planning and Development, Team Leader Randy Slenn, Special Education Supervisor VIPs and Parent Involvement Team Debbie Milam, Director of VIPS, Team Leader Coordinator, Title I Parent Involvement Elma Hasberry, Special Education Supervisor Paulette Martin, Director of Adult Education Marion Baldwin, Director of Community Education Department of School Improvement The proposal also includes a recommendation that the department name of Planning, Research, and Evaluation (PRE) be dropped in favor of a new department called School Improvement to be supervised by Dr. Kathy Lease, Assistant Superintendent. The teams reporting directly to her will be as follows: Testing and Program Evaluation Team Ed Williams, Supervisor, Team Leader TBN, NSF Program Evaluation Specialist TBN, Title I/ESL Program Evaluation Specialist Yvette Dillingham, Testing Specialist Kathy Penn-Norman, Special Education Supervisor 3Professional Development Team AAarion Woods, Coordinator, Team Leader Selma Hobby, Specialist Sue Walls, Specialist Sary Smith, Special Education Supervisor Eunice Smith, Special Education Supervisor Technical Assistance Team AAona Briggs, ACSIP (formerly COE) and CDP Coordinator, Team Leader Sayle Bradford, Campus Leadership Eddie McCoy, Title I Specialist Cassandra Steele, Special Education Coordinator This new department pulls together a multi-disciplinary group of people, all of whom are responsible to support school improvement and accountability. Depending on the work that needs to be done, all may be working on professional development, test administration, program evaluation, or other assigned tasks. Yet each team includes the necessary levels of expertise and specialization to provide leadership in the assigned areas. These teams will also work closely with those reporting directly to the Associate Superintendent. The following actions will be necessary to implement the proposal: Promotions Pat Price from Coordinatorto Director of Early Childhood Education and Elementary Literacy, 12-month contract. (In addition to her current early childhood duties, she will assume responsibility for PreK-5 Literacy, will oversee and supervise the elementary reading specialists, and will oversee the HIPPY program and supervise Marian Shead-Jackson.) Marie McNeal from Coordinatorto Director of Social Studies, 12- month contract. (She is the only curriculum leader who is not a director.) 4Ed Williams from PRE Specialistto Supervisor of Program Evaluation and Testing and Team Leader (He will supervise the two new program evaluators to be hired into this team, and he will oversee any evaluation services that are contracted out.) Linda Youngto a 12-month contract (Her new duties will require her to be on board all year.) Mono Briggs from PRE Specialistto Coordinator, Technical Assistance and Team Leader Debbie Milam from Coordinatorto Director, Parent and Community Programs (She is currently a Coordinator, with coordinators reporting to her) Regssignments Linda Young from New Futures Liaisonto Director of Planning and Development
Sene Parker from Director of Reading/English Language Artsto Director of Secondary English Language Arts
Eddie McCoy from Title I Specialist in Federal Programsto Title I Specialist in the Technical Assistance Team
Ann Freeman from Science/Smart Start Specialistto Elementary Reading Specialist
Renee Kovach from Title I Specialist in Federal Programsto Title I Specialist in the Early Childhood and Elementary Literacy Department
IMS Clerk in Federal Programsto Technical Assistance Team
Title I Parent Involvement Staff from Federal Programsto Parents and Community Team Marian Shead-Jackson, HIPPY Supervisor, to report directly to Pat Price
Mable Donaldson from Exceptional Children, to report directly to the Associate Superintendent. Lucy Lyon Neal and her staff from Technology Departmentto Curriculum/Instruction Team. Neglected/Dependent Staff in Federal Programsto Pupil Services. Liz Lucker from New Futures Departmentto Division of Administrative Services to work with Communities in Schools. 5Note: Sayle Bradford's new position was formerly on the chart as Director of Professional Development. This new plan eliminates that old position. Funding in budget will be used for the new position. New Staff Required Coordinator, ESLas per OCR recommendations Coordinator, Fine Artsidentified need Program Evaluator, NSF1/2 funded through NSF
1/2 LRSD Program Evaluator, Title I/ESL3/4 funded through Title I
1/4 from state allocation for LEP programs Secretary, Early ChildhoodDirector of Early Childhood is currently the only administrator without clerical assistance Specialist, Secondary Mathematicsto replace Vanessa Cleaver 4 Elementary Mathematics Specialists2 to be funded through Class- Size Reduction Allocation
1 to be funded through Title VI
1 to be funded through funds yet to be identified
1 Elementary Language Arts Specialistperhaps to be funded through Reading Excellence Act funds, available in late summer or from Poverty Index funds
The determination and commitment of LRSD to improve student achievement significantly, as per the various planning documents and mandates, especially compliance with the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan and the collective responsibility requirements of Campus Leadership, require more resources and more focus on teaching and learning and on support for school improvement than in the past. Every effort has been made to seek alternative funding sources for new staff (as indicated above) to reduce the stress on the local operating budget. Implementation Timeline This proposed reorganization should be implemented August 1,1999, or immediately upon approval. 6LRSD Adult Education ESL and Foreign Language Early Childhood Fine Arts org chart draft.doc 07-27-00 kD O o o f7J r . BOARD OF DIRECTORS o 5 E J SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS Q. "J U3 in LU U U u. o O) co Q CO Ct Special Assistant Communications Administrative Services School Services r* chart I I Labor Relations J Technology Instructror 2 Operations Disa'piine Alternative Education Student Assignment Pupil Services Human Resources Elementary Assistant Secondary Assistant Acceteraled Learning Athletics Reading/Latiguage Arts Mathematics/Science Social Studies Staff Devefcpmenl HIPPY Career & Technical Adult Education Early Childhood Planning/ResearcWEvaluatlon ExcepBcral Children Grants Writer New Futures Federal Programs Parent Involvement VIPS Financial Services Internal Atidibr Proctremenl Plant Services Safety/Security Child IVutrilion Transportation *RECEIVED MAR 1 2005 OFRCEOF DESEGREGATiOfiuflNITnRINR RECEIVED MAR 1 ?M5 . Qcapr f)[: DESEiGl-Etj-i
'.u.:.-u i.iUa,HITORINR Little Rock School District Organizational Audit March 2005 Consultants
Dennis M. Smith, Ed.D. Robert Klempen Leland Newcomer, Ed.D. n* CONTENTS Historical Overview of the Little Rock School District. 1 Superintendents 100-Day Entry Plan 2 Consultant Team Charge and Methodology 3 Findings and Recommendations 4 Implementation Strategy 7 Organizational Charts Summary of Position Changes 10 20 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The consultants wish to acknowledge the support and cooperation received from Superintendent Roy Brooks and the entire transition team in the preparation of this report.< LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ORGANIZATIONAL AUDIT MARCH 2005 HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT _cu uu uiv commencement of a system which will fully meet the w'ants of the whole community, the first public school in Little Rock opened its doors on August 29 1853, under the direction of the City Council of Little Rock s Committee on Schoo . In February 1869, following closure of public schools during the Civil War, the citizens ofTjtt e Founded on the hope Rock voted to establish a school district and elect a Board of Directors as provided by legislation passed by the Arkansas General Assembly that same year. schools were added to accorranodate expanding population, and in 1987, As years passed, new 14 schools from the Pulaski County Special School Distnct were annexed subsequent to legal proceedings initiated by the Little Rock School District. The district now boasts 47 schools along with alternative programs that serve approximately 26,000 students. While the district experienced great stability in its top leadership for many years (e.g.. Superintendent R. C. Halls tenure from 1909 to 1941 and the employment of eight individuals as Lperintendent from 1960 to 1990), recent years have presented a different picture. Since 1990JO individuals have served in the districts top administrative position as supenntendent and/or interim superintendent. The year 1990 also proved to be a watershed year for student enrollment in Little Rock Public 2000, the city of Little Rock experienced a population growth of 4?^6^7175 J95 to 183433). During that same period LRSD enrollment declined, ^ile African Anrericans comprise 40p=rce,>. ottoe city's nercent of the students enrolled in public schools are.----------- , . It is also significant to note that, as of 2003, almost 10,000 of the city s children are enrolled in private schools, and that number is increasing. African American (24 percent Caucasian). In May of 2000 the citizens of Little Rock approved an school building repairs, renovations and expansions d._ established a dedicated building maintenance fund. aimual 5 mil tax increase earmarked for district-wide, technology upgrades, and Also of historical importance is the LRSD desegregation case. Almost 50 years ago the Little Rock School District began the process to desegregate its schools. The governor s attempt to __ KOCK icnooi u c r /-oTitroi Miah <
rhnnl in Sent ember o block the integration of schools resulted in the crisis c,, _ , , 1957. Federafcourts have been involved in LRSD schools for much of the past three decades. Rock at Central High School in September of 1In 2002 the federal judge held that the district had substantially complied with all of its obligations except those related to evaluating programs, policies and/or procedures desired to improve and remediate African-Am eric an achievement. The court has ordered the distnct to complete specified program evaluations with assistance of outside evaluators and file a on or before October 15, 2006. Objections, if any, must be compliance report with the court--------------- . filed by November 15,2006. Subsequently, the federal court will hold a compliance heanng to determine if the district has met its obligations and should be released from further supervision and monitoring. SUPERINTENDENTS 100-DAY ENTRY PLAN During his first 100 days as superintendent of the Little Rock School District, Dr. Roy Brooks fulfilled his commitment to visit each school in the district at least once and, in fact, visited some as many as ten times. These school and department site visits provided the supenntendent opportunities to hear directly from staff members about their concerns, challenges, and hopes for the district Of note were the breakfast and lunch meetings at four schools and four administrative sites which provided the superintendent opportunities for personal interaction with more than 300 staff members. The community forums, neighborhood coffees, and meetings with teachers, ministers, business leaders, PTA Council and Superintendents Student Cabinet facilitated dialog with another 900 interested community members. The primary issues brought forward during these meetings related to accountability
student achievement
curriculum
leadership stability
parent and community involvemerit
school choice options- West Little Rock school
student discipline and attendance
unequal, and yguably inequitable, funding among schools
teacher attendance
class size
lack of matenals, books and other resources
neighborhood issues such as boarded-up houses near schools
customer service
extended year education
alternative schools
portable classrooms
site-based management
school renovation and maintenance needs
technology assistance
limited ESL resources
and inadequate professional development. This information along with input garnered from surveys completed by members of the Superintendents Student Cabinet, the PTA Council, and Teachers of the Year was considered in the development of orgamzational audit recommendations. It is important to note that, despite serious concerns, community members expressed support for LRSD schools and the accomplishments of teachers in the classrooms. The consultants would also be remiss if they did not acknowledge the professionalism demonstrated by teachers and staff members alike. Although the Little Rock School District has some of the best performing schools in the state, it is also clear that many schools are challenged and struggling. In fact, as a result of the most recent No Child Left Behind legislation, 27 of the 47 schools within the Little Rock Schotfr District are failing in performance and have been placed on the school improvement list. The Superintendent and the Board of Education are committed to establishing a system which fully meets the wants of the whole community. With that in mind, the Board recognizes the pivotal 2role the Superintendent plays in providing vision and focus in achieving the following priorities
increased student opportunities and achievement, a safe and positive learning environment a competent and professional staff, wise and efficient use of public monies, provision of state-of- the-art facilities, and increased responsiveness and accountability to LRSD parents, sWents, staff and the community. In turn, the Board supports the Superintendent in these endeavors by setting clear expectations and identifying the parameters within which he must operate as he achieves results. CONSULTANT TEAM CHARGE AND FRAMEWORK FOR AUDIT The consultants were hired to provide the Little Rock School District Board of Education and Superintendent an independent, objective analysis of the dishict. In doing so, the consuhants were to specifically compare the most effective school practices with those m the Little Rock school system and detail areas of strength and specific recommended areas for improvement. To that end the consultants were to conduct interviews, analyze the Little Rock school system, and report on those results to the school board in March 2005 with a specific recoi^ended action plan. The focus of the consultants efforts was to be on identifying practices that will lead to increased and improved student achievement in the Little Rock School District. BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE METHODOLOGY EMPLOYED The consultants were hired in September 2004 by the Board of Education at the recommendation irganizational audit of the Little Rock school system. To 250 individuals within the Little Rock School of the Superintendent to conduct an oi accomplish this, the consultants interviewed over . District and community. Interviewees included classroom teachers, school pnncipals, distnct administrators, union officials, the educational foundation, community members, business leaders, each of the individual board members, and the superintendent. The interviews ranged from 30 minutes to 2 hours. Questions were asked relative to each of the six identified areas o effective schools
applied governance and management, strategic planning, performance^d accountability system, issue resolution and decision making, defined organizational structure. and standardized protocols. consultants worked closely with the transition team of district staff consisting of In addition, the consultants worked closely witn me iransuioi icam Beverly Williams, Director of Human Resources
Sadie Mitchell, Associate Supennfrndent for School Services
Karen DeJamette, Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation
Olivine Roberts, Associate Superintendent of Curriculum and Instruction
Suellen Vann, Director of Communications
and Mark Milhollen, Manager of Financial Services. The consultants give oreat credit and appreciation to the transition team for the invaluable assistance they provided e consultants, particularly as it applies to the reorganization structure^ Additionally the consultants maintained close communication with the Friday Law Firm to ensure that a recommendations are compatible with Arkansas law. o' 3FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Strategic Planning The strategic plan developed by the Board of Education in 2003 was reviewed by the consultants and discussed with stakeholders. Although the objectives of the LRSD strategic plan are laudable portions of the plan are not results-based and data-driven. The consultants found little evidence of an accountability system tied to the strategic plan. Furthermore, in their interviews with staff the consultants found that the current LRSD strategic plan seems to have little influence on the day-to-day actions of administrators or their decision making. It is, therefore, recommended that the Little Rock School District consider revamping the strategic plan to clearly identify the highest priorities as well as an accountability system in which executive staff are able to report back specific evidence of results. This plan must be linked with the budgeting process to ensure that goals established by the Board are driving the human and physical resources of the district. Applied Governance and Management In their review of the district, the consultants found that the school board is a highly involved, caring group of individuals who place the children of the Little Rock School District as their highest priority In July 2004 the school board hired a new superintendent, signaling an apparent mandate to address inefficiencies within the school system and concerns relative to inconsistent student achievement. The consultants review of the governance and management practices within the district found that the Board has done an excellent job of providing the Superintendent with the authority and freedom to work with staff to accomplish the major priorities within the school system. The Board and Superintendent would be well served to engage in Board govemance/management training to refine and reinforce the role of the governing board m relation to the role of the Superintendent to ensure the optimal operation of the school system. Performance and Accountability System The consultants found that, although an evaluation system is in place, a direct linkage between the evaluation system and the goals established by the Superintendent and Board of Education is not evident. Therefore, the priorities of the Board and the Superintendent should be aligned with the performance and accountability system for individuals within the district. The consultants observations point to an over-reliance on accountability for processes and activities as opposed to results. The Little Rock school system must establish clearly identified, results-oriented objectives for staff as well as develop an evaluation system that directly links staff accountability to the achievement of these results. 4The consultants also received significant feedback regarding the physical location of central services for the LRSD. Services such as student registration, curriculum and instruction, special education, facilities, transportation, and others are housed in 10 different locations across the greater Little Rock area. This lack of consolidation and coordination is fundamental to many ot die communication problems experienced by staff and community members alike and creates a disjointed system of administrative services to stakeholders. It is the recommendation of the consultants that consideration be given to the consolidation of all the administrative services into one facility. It is recognized that this will require extensive review and it is recommended that a blue ribbon task force that would include business leaders be involved in examination of this situation. Issue Resolution and Decision Making The consultants found many outstanding and dedicated individuals within the Little Rock School District administration whose efforts reflect a general desire to support teachers, staff, and members of the public. Having said that, there does not appear to be an institutionalized passion and strategy in place to assist individual managers in addressing complex and oftentimes emotional issues, making difficult decisions, and reducing the likelihood of risks based on systematic and sound rational thinking practices. It appears, by the bureaucracy that has been created, the first and only alternative considered when a problem anses is to add central services staff. It is essential that the district provide the training for problem solving and decision m^ng to assist staff in addressing the myriad of challenging situations that occur. These analytic skills and management tools will be essential as leaders at all levels embrace the new philosophy. This emphasis on bureaucratic processes and procedures has diminished the focus on the tme mission of the administrative staff, which is to support the organizational missionstudent achievement. Standardized Protocol The most effective school systems have clearly defined and standardized practices in place which address both daily operational issues and crisis situations which may occur within the organization. These practices and procedures are essential to eliminate guesswork when an issue o7crisis arises. Generally, these protocols will be in writing, or at the least, be well known to all within the organization as a result of effective communication. The Little Rock school system suffers from having a vast bureaucracy with multiple layers embedded within that bureaucracy. There is not an understanding of who can provide needed direction, and there are often mixed messages conveyed to staff, teachers principals et^ resulting confusion about how to respond and react to a given situation. For the most part, there is little evidence that there are consistent, uniform, and standardized protocols in place across h district. 5Following the reorganization of the Little Rock School Districts administrative structoe priority must be placed on establishing specific protocols and practices in the areas of budge , finance, facilities, communications, and Board governance and management. Organizational Structure and is fundamental to many In the opinion of the consultants, this is the area of greatest concern of the problems being experienced within the school district. The LRSD is cle^ly overstaffed at the central office level. This overstaffing has resulted in the inability of the school system to effectively serve the needs of its clientsthe children, teachers, and pnncipals at its school sites. In fact contrary to the intent, the continual adding of positions has produced an opposite effect, that of providing less effective service to those who need it the most. The consultants extensive review of the organization also indicated the multiple and
This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.