Little Rock Schools: Franklin Elementary

What is the Highland Park Redevelopment Initiative? With a HUD development grant and investments by corporations, the community and the City, the Highland Park Redevelopment Initiative is a strategic, catalytic reinvestment effort in a centrally located neighborhood of Little Rock. The approach includes: The total demolition of the former Highland Park public housing site
The reconstruction of a new mixed-income development
and Perhaps more significantly, assisted housing residents and community members living in and around Highland Park have and will continue to participate throughout the development process. Whom may I contact for additional information or for a presentation to my community or civic organization? L. Lee Jones, Executive Director Little Rock Housing Authority or Polly Kinslowe, Sr. Vice President McCormack Baron and Associates 1000 Wolfe Street, Little Rock, AR 72202 (501)340-4821 phone (501)340-4845 fax The Highland Park Community Redevelopment Initiativer Invitation MEETING AGENDA The Development Team Tke Little Rock Housing One of the overarching goals of the redevelopment of Highland Park is the ACTIVE INVOL VEMENTof community residents in the creation of an economically strong community. T'he highly experienced development firm of McCormack Baron and Associates, along Autkority Boand of Commissioners, Residents and Staff, join witk our experienced development partner McCormack Welcome and Acknowledgments with the Fennell Purifoy Architectural firm will provide the leadership for the Little Rock Housing Authority, housing residents, and community members in the planning and Baron and Associates, Inc. Highland Demolition Update in inviting you to attend a community meeting to review and discuss tke preliminary arckitectural design and renderings for tke new mixed-income di on Development Team Introductions An overview of the Design Process Review of the Proposed Site Plan evelopment to Le kuilt Review of the Proposed Unit Plan building of the development. M new mixed-income cCormack Baron is a unique for-profit company that approaches the development tke former Hi^kland Park pukkc kousing site Review of the Proposed Building Elevations 1 Discussion /Questions/ Comments Thursday December 5,1996 6:00 p.m. - 7:30 p.m. Wrap-up / Next Steps Franklin Incentive Elementary School 1701 S. Harrison Street Mrs. Ethel Dunbar, Principal process with a social purpose. A nationally recognized leader in urban revitalization, MBA's corporate purpose and commitment is ^to create quality housing and provide superior property management. With this as a beginning premise, McCormack Baron has' found that the redevelopment process is best served by creating strong relationships with cities, as well as with neighbors and neighborhood groups to learn their goals, needs and expectations with respect to new housing within their community. The LRHA, housing residents, McCormack Baron, Fennell Purifoy and the community of Little Rock working together have the expertise necessary to make the Highland Redevelopment Initiative a model for others throughout the nation. Little Rock School District c ommunication technology is integrated into the core curriculum at Franklin through the addition of r creative writing, public speaking, interpersonal skills, multi-cultural education, and conflict resolution. Skills that are taught throughout the curriculum are speaking, writing, reading, studying, listening, test taking and thinking. Technology is utilized in five areas: individualized learning group interaction management and coordination of student learning student expression knowledge production (creating, exploring and discovering) Goals of the program are to enhance student achievement, reduce gender and racial disparity, promote self-discipline, develop higher level thinking skills, instill task commitment and responsibility, develop basic academic skills, and to enhance the educational, cultural and social opportunities of students. Students are allowed, with instructional guidance, to set their own pace. The positive learning atmosphere at Franklin is success-oriented, risk-free, organized, orderly and flexible. Our student-centered atmosphere has learning centers and interactive computer software. Students are encouraged to set their own goals. They're free to move about the classroom and receive positive reinforcement for their efforts and accomplishments. At Franklin, we teach communication skills that are the building blocks for understanding. ft Xo) Xo" > JO O to LA 00 3* ft) 3 OO 3 fp (T> ?3 O o pr c a. > !CZ/>5 C 3 O O o Sc OQ 3 3 O O o I 1 a 72 O > 72 o 3 z o NJ o co > o c w Iort tfOoJ n> o dQQJ 0n)' o' 2O 3 O Franklin Communications Technology Elementary School First Class Schools For World Class Kids Communication Skills En-* hance Ability To Succeed Students at Franklin get a head start as they learn to speak and write effectively and interact with people who have varying viewpoints. Some of the special programs that promote communications skills include: Beta Club, Math Olympiads, international pen pals. Quiz Bowl, Career Club, Drama Club, B.U.G. (Bring Up Your Grades), Lunch Bunch Computer Club and a school newspaper. Students become active learners by engaging in project-oriented activities and by writing activities that broaden their knowledge of telecommunications. We promote G.U.M. - Getting, Understanding and Manipulating information. Through this process, students become independent thinkers, doers and learners. These are the skills which ultimately can lead them to a successful and productive career. SPECIAL ATTRACTIONS Interactive Technology to Enhance Communications Skills Science Lab and Production Lab Management and Coordination of Student Learning A Different Learning Environment A 54-station computer lab, a "Writing to Read" lab, and the usage of other interactive technology creates an enhanced learning environment for students at all levels. Our trained staff promotes independent thinking and responsibility among students. We promote the best of both educational worlds - high sensitivity and high tech - which develops students with a head and a heart for the future. * Conflict Resolution Multicultural Education Achievement Recognition Emphasis on Individualized Learning Styles Franklin Communications Technology Elementary School 1701 South Harrison Little Rock, AR 72204 501/671-6380 Activities: Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, Spanish Club, Interdistrict Pen Pals FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, CALL OR VISIT THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ASSIGNMENT OFFICE 501 SHERMAN, LITTLE ROCK, AR 501/324-2272 OR CALL OUR INCENTIVE SCHOOL HOTLINE, 501/688-3085 Gifted/Talented Program Extended Day and Extended Week Activities Before and After School Care Program - Supervised Activities, 7 a.m.-5:30 p.m. Four-Year-Old Program Franklin Communications Technology Elementary School is a part of the LRSD Incentive School Program. Incentive schools receive extra financial resources which allow for big results in basic skills education and enrichment. experiences. Reading and mathematics will be stressed in the academic program, and parent involvement will be encouraged. Franklin Early Childhood Environmental Sciences/Basic Skills Magnet (Pre K-6) An early childhood and environmental sciences magnet will be opened at the Franklin Elementary school beginning in the 1991-92 school year. Romine Gifted and Talented/Basic Skills Magnet (Pre K-6) An interdistrict magnet school will be established at Romine Elementary featuring an intensive traditional program along with a strong gifted and talented program. An emphasis on critical thinking will prepare students for earning a living, for responsible citizenship. and for self-development after formal education is completed. Because the magnet parent committee recommends traditional programs for elementary magnet schools, all students will take the same course of study. Students will benefit from the use of three learning modes
1) traditional instruction by lecture and reading. 2) individualized instruction in coaching labs that use active learning and critical thinking, and 3) student discussion seminars that further the understanding of basic ideas and values. This program will start at the beginning of the 1991-92 school year. 12 FACILITIES LRSD will have thirty-one non-magnet elementary schools. The magnet schools will continue to operate under present court orders. Elementary Academies There will be twenty-two Elementary Academies. The name reflects LRSD's commitment to provide an excellent desegregated education program in each of these schools. The Elementary Academies with the capacity and projected racial composition of each, are listed below: School Capacity Black Non-Black Total % Black Badgett 275 92 73 155 53% Bale 394 188 124 312 60% Baseline 417 206 125 331 6 2% Brady 420 190 172 362 52% Chicot 563 255 231 486 52% Cloverdale 420 213 141 354 60% Dodd 424 198 164 362 55% I Fair Park Forest Park Fulbright Geyer Springs Jefferson Mabelvale McDermott Meadowcliff 351 154 130 284 54% 436 203 180 383 53% 607 267 236 503 53% 235 120 98 218 55% 490 541 531 465 226 205 431 52% 261 260 237 231 216 208 492 476 445 53% 55% 53% 25 02227 School Capacity Black Non-Black Total % Black Otter Creek 383 183 162 345 5 3% Pulaski Heights 328 159 119 278 57% Terry 537 260 224 484 54% Wakefield 472 215 184 399 54% Watson 472 227 157 384 59% Western Hills 328 165 140 305 54% Wilson 409 228 170 398 57% Totals 9,501 Incentive Schools There will be eight Incentive Schools which are listed below with the number of classrooms in each each at twenty-five students per classroom: as well as the capacity of School Classes Capacity at 25 Franklin 28 700 Garland 16 400 Ish 11 275 Mitchell 14 350 Rightsell 12 300 Rockefeller 16 400 Stephens 13 325 Washington 42 1050 Totals 136 3800 26 02228Black Enrollment in Incentive and Interdistrict Schools Total Enrollment in Ele. Aca Racial Composition of Ele. Aca. Recruitment Capacity for Ele. Aca. 2,000 10,350 62.3% <89> 2,500 9,850 60.9% 411 3,000 9,350 58.8% 911 3,500 8,850 56.5% 1,411 3,600 8,650 56% 1,511 Construction 1988-89 Washington School is closed for the 1938-89 school year. A new Washington School is being built at the same site with a projected capacity of 1,050 students. The students who were originally assigned to Washington for the 1938-39 school year have been reassigned to Ish, Mitchell, Rockefeller and Rightsell. These students (166) will have a preference to return to the Washington in the 1989-90 school year. new 1989-90 A new wing is being added to Franklin School and will be completed prior to the start of the 1989-90 school year. Franklin's new capacity will be 560. Woodruff has a capacity of 245 students and is situated in a neighborhood that has no real potential for white growth. Woodruff is presently 75% black. Probably the best use of this facility is to use it as the Instructional Resource Center (IRC) * or as an alternative school. Woodruff will be closed as an elementary school at the end of the 1988-89 school year. 29 02231<o introduction incentive SCHOpr. PROGRAM Beginning in the 1989-90 school year, District will have the Little Rock School school program. eight (8) schools Rockefeller may become providing the incentive but would continue to provide the i an interdistrict school, incentive school purpose or the incentive program. The academic excellence desegregate. will school program is to promote and ensure in schools that have been It is believed that the difficult to incentive school nor only compensate the program victims of program will also segregation, but the serve as a tool for long-lasting desegregation promoting meaningful and in these schools school district. and in the entire The following schools program: will provide the incentive school -Franklin -Garland -Ish -Mitchell -Rightsell -Rockefeller -Stephens -Washi.net on In order to be successful, the incentive the academic, program must address ticipants. social and emotional needs_ of all student The incentive parprogram must also serve as a recruit- 31 02233ODM Visits to LRSD Schools, Opening Days 1994 Franklin Incentive School We were pleased to note that: Brush had been cleared from the fenceline on the northern border of the school. A new sidewalk had been installed at the entrance to the building. The parking lot had been resurfaced. A new parent center, which is attractive and comfortably-appointed, had been situated across from the office. The school's new business partner, the City of Little Rock, had installed two new picnic tables on the playground. The entrance area had bright, attractive signs welcoming students and visitors. Classrooms appeared well-prepared and ready for students. Hallways were clean and decorated with bright, attractive displays and bulletin boards
hall floors were waxed. Hall mles posted throughout the building were expressed in positive terms. Staff and students were fnendly and helpful. We also noted some areas needing attention. On June 2, 1994, ODMfiled a letter to the court regarding the condition of the Mitchell and Franklin facilities. Later in June, the LRSD responded to that letter, indicating that the problems cited in the letter had been addressed. However, as we visited Franklin during the opening week of school, monitors found some of the same deficiencies cited in the June 1994 letter. The problem areas now include: Most of the walls throughout the building had paint that is splotchy and mis-matched
splashes and drips of misplaced paint mar the windows, baseboards, and bathroom fixtures. Ceiling tiles throughout the building had been discolored and damaged by water stains. The glass in many of the windows and exterior doors was dirty. Several hall flooring tiles were broken. A girls' restroom on the first floor contained only one fully operable sink (one sink had no water, and two other lacked water pressure sufficient for hand washing). All of the sinks were dirty, one was rusty, and all bore the remains of old paint, as did the toilet seats. A boys' bathroom on the second floor contained a continuously rutming urinal. The rocky hill on the northeast border of the school property remains a tempting danger zone. Continual erosion has exposed solid rock outcroppings whose slopes are covered with small, sharp stones.Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 June 2, 1994 fileo EASSTR'CTARV'^< The Honorable Susan Webber Wright U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas P.O. 3316 Little Rock, AR 72201 JIM - 2139^ Bv:. OEP CLEW< Dear judge Wright: During the process of monitoring the six incentive schools in the Little Rock School District (LRSD) this year, we recendy concluded visits to Franklin, Garland, Mitchell, Rightsell, Stephens, and Rockefeller. We are presently preparing a comprehensive incentive school monitoring report that will include findings based upon these on-site inspections. During our May visits to the incentive schools, we noted problems with the Franklin and Mitchell facilities that alarm us. Because our complete report will not be published until later this summer, 1 am filing this short, preliminary report to alert the Court and the parties to conditions at Franklin and Mitchell that need immediate correction before staff and students return to those buildings next school term. The comments are excerpted from the draft Facilities Section of our incentive school report and, therefore, include our positive observations as well as notations describing conditions needing prompt attention. The LRSD is presently petitioning the Court to close Stephens Incentive School, citing the "declining condition" and "structural problems" of that facility as among the reasons for seeking to close it. By immediately tending to needed repairs at Franklin and Mitchell, the LRSD will be able to prevent declining conditions that could lead to structural problems at those two buildings. Quick attention to facility needs should help the district avoid any appearance that it is failing to maintain incentive schools as a basis for eventually closing them due to deterioration. Sincerely yours, Ann S. Brown Enc. cc: All Parties and Counsel of Record ODM Observations of the Facilities at Franklin and Mitchell Incentive Schools When the monitors visited the incentive schools in the spring of 1993-94, we noted several problems with the facilities at both Franklin and Mitchell. Below is our description of the conditions we observed at those two schools, followed by a summary list of problems that require immediate attention. Franklin: The Franklin facility has deteriorated visibly since the last monitoring visit we made during the 1992-93 school year. The roof leaks that have plagued the school for years persist, leaving damaged ceilings throughout the building. Gaping holes mar the cafeteria ceiling, and the ceiling of the principals office collapsed a few weeks prior to our visit. Rainwater also floods under doors into one office and a classroom on the third level of the building. On the first level, both ceiling and floor tiles have deteriorated and are unattractive. Walls throughout the interior are grubby and unattractive. The Franklin custodians have spot- painted some walls, but the spots stand out conspicuously because the new paint does not match the old. The district made several improvements to the schools exterior during 1993-94. Workers removed some old, dangerous wooden equipment from the playground and replaced it with more modem equipment salvaged from Ish Incentive School, which closed at the end of the 1992-93 school year. Four-year-olds received an additional climbing structure in their play area and e assistant principal reported that the PTA and Student Council were working cooperatively on future projects for playground improvements. Mitchell: Our previous reports on the incentive schools have praised the Mitchell facility. Indeed the 1908 structure designed by Charles Thompson, Arkansas most noted architect, is beautifully designed and appears structurally sound. But several areas of the building have fallen into disrepair. During 1993, we noted a severe ceiling leak in the reading room. During the past year, the math classroom next door developed a similar problem. Teachers told us that district workers made several attempts to correct the problem, but the leaks have nevertheless persisted. The district installed new carpet in each classroom during the spring of 1994, but the unabated leaks ruined the ceilings and the new carpet in both these classrooms, leaving an objectionable musty smell. The new carpet in other parts of the building looks fresh and neat, but its slate blue color clashes with the earth-toned walls. When the district renovated Mitchell several years ago, the architects took care to select a color palette appropriate to the period of the schools construction. The new carpet ignores those earlier efforts, and gives the interior a rather hodgepodge appearance. The multi-story building includes a basement that houses the cafeteria, kitchen, and minimal classroom space. The stairs leading down to one section of the basement have become so tilted, due to settling of the building, that they present a danger to solid footing. Workers had replaced the broken floor tiles noted in our 1992-1993 report, but several of the brown and white floor tiles, used throughout the first floor of the building, were loose when we visited this time.The exterior of the building includes some commendable improvements and some obvious needs. The schools entry area is now pleasantly adorned by a large flower bed planted with blooming annuals. The four-year-old children have an additional play structure designed for their use, but it is inconveniently located and inaccessible from their classroom. The youngsters must leave their room and walk into the main building to find the only exit that leads to this fenced play area. The buildings exterior trim paint has begun to flake off in some areas, signaling the need for scraping and repainting. Summary Listing of Conditions Requiring Immediate Correction Franklin: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Ceiling leaks Ceilings damaged by leaks Holes in the cafeteria ceiling Collapsed ceiling in the principals office Dirty walls Mismatched spot painting Flooding from rainwater on the third level Deteriorated ceiling and floor tiles on the first level Mitchell: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Ceiling leaks Ceilings damaged by leaks Carpets damaged by leaks Tilted basement stairs Loose floor tiles Peeling exterior paint9 f- Drcib^rr Little Rock School District OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT June 21, 1994 JUN 2 4 1994 Mrs. Ann Brown, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 East Markham Street, Suite 520 Heritage West Building Otiios ci Dessgrsgaiion iv: -g Little Rock, AR 72201 .^2 -V Dear Ann: !i I have enclosed for your perusal and records a copy of a document that was forwarded to me by Mr. Eaton in response to your partial report on the physical condition of particularly Mitchell and Franklin. the incentive schools. The report provided by Mr. Eaton seems to suggest that the buildings are not being neglected and are on a regular maintenance schedule and obviously do receive special consideration when circumstances warrant special attention. It might be a good idea, Ann, for us to meet with Doug regarding the incentive schools so that you and your people are aware of what the capital plans call for with regard to the repairs of all District facilities. Should you require additional information on the incentive schools. please let me know, and I'll get it for you. In the meantime. please consider the possibility of scheduling a meeting with Doug to look at all of the facilities. Sipcerely, Hl P. Williams Superintendent of Schools HPW:nr Encl. 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 324-2000 JOHN W. WALKER RALPH WASHINGTON MARK BURNETTE AUSTIN PORTER, JR. JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. Attorney At Law 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 Telephone (501) 374-3758 FAX (501) 374-4187 RECEIVED AUG 8 1995 Office of Desegregation Moniicring Via Facsimile - 324-2146 August 7, 1995 Dr. Henry P. Williams Superintendent of Schools Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Dr. Williams: In making a routine monitoring visit today, we were shocked to find at Franklin Incentive School the following: 1) There is no principal
2) 3) There is no assistant principal
There are eight teaching vacancies
and 4) Registration is underway and staff, parents and students are in substantial disarray. By return facsimile these facts
and if so, ' are obvious plan violations. 1, please let me know, if you are aware of what you intend to do about them. These Very truly yours, John W. Walker JWW:js cc: Ms. Linda Pendexter Ms. Ann BrownI SW' Lar -'J LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Franklin Incentive School 1701 South Harrison Phone 671-6380 Little Rock, Arkansas 72204 September 29, 1995 -IS9S Dear Mrs Lyon: As you know, our theme is Communications and Technology with an emphasis on reading and writing. As a staff, we realize that we must adhere to the language of the Desegregation Plan and develop this selected theme through Interdisciplinary Thematic units. A thorough assessment of equipment in our building revealed that computers have not been placed in any of the classrooms and there is one VCR/television for each grade level. To say this poses a problem with instructional planning is an understatement The computer laboratory is equipped with 56 computer stations, but many are in need of repair. needed. New mice, headphones, and pads are In addition, there is a need for current software programs on the hard drive. Deluxe. For example
Wordperfect, and Print Shop * ' I I^.-^HSSWAIW^ As the building principal, I am asking that you give consideration to making a request through your department to determine if the district would purchase VCR's, and television for each classroom in our building. I am especially appreciative of your past assistance. Sincerely, Ethel Dunbar, Principal cc: Dr. Henry Williams Mr. Mark MilhollenZ-"' A - IMN' LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT
-r4rs'v EDUCATIONAL EQUITY MONITORING / PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION DEPARTMENT Little Rock, Arkansas September 1995 I 08/23/95 <9 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 Equitable Placement by Race/Gender in School Programs 1 2.0 Curriculum 2 3.0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4 4.0 Committees 4 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 5 6.0 Student Achievement/Assessment 5 7.0 Special Education 6 8.0 Gifted and Talented Education 7 9.0 Staff Development 8 10.0 Parental Involvement 9 11.0 Student Discipline 10 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 11 Key: I Interview O = Observe / SP School ProfileLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNTNGf RESEARCH--AwNi'tDw EVALUATION DEPARTMENT 1995-96 Froz'klli CominM_nic<v+on SCHOOL
4>Tffl>nol PRINCIPAL: MONITOR(S) GRADE LEVEL(s): DATE: NUMBER OF CLASSES VISITED: AAalt n^la ^A^ctr4-
in .on Observers are recruired to provide evidence for each criterion. Please print observations and evidence in sufficient detail to indicate positive practices and areas in need of improvement. Observers should review the School Profile prior to completing this form. CRITERIA CIRCLE ONE 1.0 Ejuitable Placement by RaceZGende: in School Programs The school ensures equal access and fair treatment in all programs resulting in optimum conditions for student learning. S 1.1 The composition of students have access to, he school staff ensures that YES 3P SP 1.3 and contact with, NO varied staff of certified and non-certified a personnel. School enrollment reflects the racial,/ethnic composition prescribed by the court approved desegregatip: EVIDENCE: 1 hbuml i oalQeTs VikH Class/course enrollments generally reflect the racial/ethnic co: YES YES NO imposition of the school. --------- Scj\QpX\5 s 5 gn/OC 4^ EVIDENCE: 1 Educational Equity Monitoring CRITERIA CIRCLE ONE SP 1.4 If needed, strategies to eliminate disproportionate class/course enrollments or one- YES NO SP/0 1.5 race classes EVIDENCE: / evident.j ffUoh a55n nm s_ Indicate specific subject, (math, science. 11 \ /> > 7 2.0 /I O/I 0 language, etc.) room number and approximate number of students of any one race classes. . Rm# Rm# Rm#' 5 Number of students 7 Race^ Time^/^'Sub j ect Number of students RaceTTTime//?,'#/7Subj ect / ___ ^Number of students/^ Race'^Timey^^Z/fSubject Rm# ^3.44umber of students___ Race__ Time___ Subject____ Curriculum Race The school provides a curriculum that is reflective of cultural differences. Local and/or state-developed course content guides enhance multicultural content in all curriculum areas. 2.1 2.2 2.3 In classrooms observed, the teachers have adequate materials and equipment to deliver, the curriculum. oLseujjna/^ei d aiuA/Ta ddjj-ia--j-^-- FJyLu'ld^ onfy) t)r\P. j-eAC/juC Current and complete student records are maintained in the classroom and school o ice to monitor the progress in achievement of the individual learner (i.e. grade books. Abacus reports, PRFs, interim and parent conference reports, r^ort cards lesson plans) EVIDEN' had be.^ ' I I IUX( i tti I i YES NO ts, reoort cards, iBsson , idupJ aiSplcuJ^ All students are actively involved in classroom YES NO iinnssttrruuccttiioonr.jX / / , i H EEVVIIDDEENNCC:E: cla^5 ohs^e^d i>j jp^ni-tof^r LS~i Educational Equity Monitoring TS^n--------- --------- 0 2.4 _____________________ CRITERIA____________________________ Classroom seating patterns promote interaction among students of ^i^er , EVIDENCE: race/<6^de: e 0 0 o O/I 2.5 There is evidence that the multicultural curriculum is being implemented. 2.5.1 2.5.2 c. 5. k 2.6 3 yp. CIRCLE ONE YES NO Bulletin boards, displays of projects, publications, and productions throughout the school (including the media center) reflect the racial/ethnic/gender differences of the student body and/or multiculturali EVIDENCE: inWrTf^ YES NO ralism. il I J VP s lUL Bulletin boards, displays of projects, publications, and productions in the classroom reflect ,the racial/ethnic/ gender differences of the student body and/or multiculturalism. / j ClS^ ZXy6UAzA4j^fl-Z. tre is a. disolay af 'ttudenr diidJ There a display ____________ __ 1 i . EVIDENCE: Liosr^.. n{nn^' JZl [<1 , YES YES NO NO Multicultural objectives of the curriculum EVIDENCE: YES NO
kce: ovTQMXnc::, im^uides are tn aught 7^f>>nc^ 'amnmffKfi J t The library media specialist annually evaluates the adequacy of multicultural materials in the media collection and continually evaluates new materials to be considered for^purchase. EVIDENC, .14- Y-ES NO ! .als tor purcnase. i Kk-Tt/x ij^ r,jg4a^ . Gfy> . -r z? zpipa i, \ferr ITYUjvC SrVuyitAy N\jp a. ^TCUtT ITYXO^ Educational Equity-Monitoring PS^g' 4------------------------------------- CRITERIA 3.0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards * The school ensures that no student is denied access to being selected for honors and awards through establishment of non-biased and equitable policies and procedures. SP 3.1 A variety of awards and honors is provided in areas such as scholarship, citizenship, oporto, school and .ance ubs, a: SP 3.2 SP c 4.0 S CIRCLE ONE YES NO ^ENCE
ga/^zationsy . Written procedures and requirements governing honors and awards are distributed to staff, students and parents EVID^CE: fthOfe. YES NO The offerings and procedures regarding honors and awards are evaluated regularly for equity and to determine if new awards are necessary to meet student need: riarr^-hiX. I I The distribution of honors and awards is generally i reflective Ev: lective O',thhee school ppccppuullaattiioonn./ YES YES NO NO Committees The school staff ensures that appointments to all school based committees are made in a non-biased and equitable manner which results in comm.' ttees with diverse population that have knowledge of educational programs for a varied student population. 4.1 The composition of each appointed school based staff/parent committee generally reflects the vYES f NO staff/ stude: ) cf kJK'kt' oJ' c/>7 4 kJ h 4L'z2cnnifrt^,, , /III k, Equity Monitoring Plga.ft.., ,, __ _ -U .------f _ __ _ __________________________ CRITERIA 5-0. Extracurricular Activities t CIRCLE ONE SP SP 6,0 The school's extracurricular I , -------------- program helps to develop important academic/non-academic skills, abilities and interests t = S' I 5.1 Procedures 5.2 are ev-i-d--e--n t' to assure t^XhAaU Vt Os tVuUd ents apprisedof infonnation regarding various opportunities in extracurricular activities/ eexxcteenndaeedd eedd-u--c--a--t------- ' fJ2c2izU}zzx:^ tiqn. are YES NO ^AvT the, c^mi7iayh,t^ P^^'^^oipation in extracurricular extended educational activities/ tthhee sscchhooooll pooulation. 7*> programs generally reflects YES^ NO ^czhievement/Assessment The school staff implements i._ procedures for administration, most recent standardized tests. non-discriminatory analysis, and use of the I SP ^.1 When test results are examined, students remains stable oi -o-----l--a-----c----k------ -----s----t--u-denl^ achievemen sEA^IKD- safe evement a^M improves achievement of increases as YES NO spfo e.2 * fwiyr I, ry r tCLaP !/> ^^aixh Goals and strategies a__r__e_ __d_e__v_el,o__o__e,d _ ana. .i mp.l ement i. to aecrease the achievement differences between iscK students and white students ed YES KO measure of student achievement. ...Stanford Eight Achievement Test EVIDENCE: on the following / Cin+.'" I'n acJ^e-verne^ i)/ Whife intiMSfcd or nv!UMJ swjwUe ach'wemt/ir oP blatk inwezbS^- AJo Usf GrcJeS' 6o^^ cumL V)V
R djetxti^sec/- 3Ti5\afJk VxiVaiI'C vjU'te s'juJ^: Monitorrn CRITERIA CIRCLE ONE SP 6.3 Failure/retention rates reflect the school population YES O/I 6.5 Ev: Graduation rates reflect the schoo (high school only) EVIDENCE
* NO Test taking skills a: 7.0 Special Education k opulation. taught througho' bpcki useJ .0/ YES NO t the year. YES NO The school staff ensures that student placement and services provided in the special education program are non-discriminatory. SP/I 7.1 Strategies to eliminate disproportionate student assignmenntt t' o specia'l education,are evident EVIDENCE YES NO Q/T 1.1 o 7.3 Q -J il education evident. '/ f The teachers have adequate materials and equipment to deliver ii^hhee ccuurrrriiccuulluxi ji. , gDENCE: Cor>\l d n/)f Facilities are comparable to those of the campus in general.^ t / ^IDENCE: \ ccmaPgX^^ (^Are, A.i.. J Classrooms are integrated into the total school environment. EVIDENCE: YES O YES YES NO NO ^IDEN^L^'\ is /-hit M. ^cith3naT -Equfty "Hon i ng / O/I 7.5 0 7.6 CRITERIA CIRCLE ONE the students served/., ^^ENC^ special education meet the needs of '( ^rrent copies of student records are maintained in the classroom to monitor the progress and achievement of the individual learner (i.e., grade books, lEP--------- ---------------- EVIDENCE:
als and objectives YES NO ES NO ^als objectives, .lesson plans). , 8-0 Gifted and Talented Education The school staff ensures that student placement and services provided in the Gifted/Talented program non-discriminatory. are SP/I 8.1 Strategies to eliminate disproportionate assignment to gifted and talented are evident. EVIDENCE: student YE, \ctervhBA/J^" NO 8.2 *he teachers have adequate materials and eouipment to deliver the curriculum. EVIDENCE: YES NO Q 8.3 Facilities are comparable to those of the in general. EVIDENCE: campus YES NO 0 8.4 Classrooms are integrated into the total school environment. EVIDENCE: YES NOPage 8 Hgnitogina CRITERIA CIRCLE ONE O/I 8.5 Facilities for gifted and talented meet the needs of the students served. EVIDENCE: _______________________________ ___ ______________ YES NO 0 8.6 Current copies of students' records are maintained in the classroom to monitor the progress and achievement of the individual learner (i.e., test results, identification folder, progress folder). EVIDENCE: ~~ ______________________ YES NO 9.0 Staff Development The staff development plan for the school demonstrates commitment to educational equity. SP/I 9.1 Staff development activities related to educational equity to enhance the achievement of a diverse student population have been provided and YES are ongoing (i.e., Cooperative Learning, TESA, PET) m J p\j T rvn I eAri ti>p * tl SP/I 9.2 staff development activities in teaching straxegies for multicultural have been provided. EVIDENCE: :urriouluE delivery YES NO I SP/I 9.3 Staff development activities related to discipline/classroom management have been provided (i.e., assertive discipline, conflict management, and positive classroom discipline, ere.). YES EVIDENCE: ar Educational Equity Monitoring Page-9 ------ ______ SP/I 9.4 _____________________ CRITERIA______________________ Regular classroom teachers are provided ongoing training in understanding the remedial programs. EVIDENCE: 3Z3 CIRCLE ONE YES 10.0 Parental Involvement The school provides equitable opportunities for parental involvement in the district/school activities. O/I 10.1 The school utilizes a variety of methods (memo, letter, phone, home visits) to encourage parental involvement in school and in home supported educational activities. (List in order of YES NO eeffffeeccttiivveenneessss^)) ^EIVDIDEENNCCEE:: ut f.,cnALmJU<l I <gxh^ib(4^ 1 n.-bi SP/I 10.2 All identifiable groups of parents are actively involved in school functions. YES EVIDENCE: ^nvolv- SP/I 10.3 Documentation is available to indicate that parents are actively involved in each phase of YES NO I SP remediation programs in which their child(ren) 10.4 Contact is made regularly with the home to communicate positive/negative (as appropriate) information related to student behavior and/or aacchnievxeemvenetmenrv J I | | pts I EVIDENT 10.5 School patrons and parents are given an opportunity to actively participate in developing the local School Improvement Plan/Comprehensive Outcome Evj s (COE). _m 5 YES NO (^Y^P NO ^duea t i-ona l--Equity-MenirtogiB^ Page 10 . _ __________________________________CRITERIA________________ SP/I 10.6 Mini-seminars at PTA meetings and/or in the community have been held to make parents aware of district structure, policy and programs, and ways CIRCLE ONE YES NO to access them. SriDENCE: . _ 11.0 Student Discipline I The staff ensures that student disciplinary policies and practices are non-discriminatory. 11.1 Information, including the staff's expectation for student conduct, in the form of handbooks and/or public presentations regarding student disciplinary policies and procedures is distributed to all students EVIDENCE: den^s and parente. _________a I 11.2 School staff has plans, procedures, and practices which are designed to enable students to remain in school, promote academic success and alleviate behavior problems. EVIDENCE: =------------ X SP 11.3 Suspension and expulsion rates are generally representativie of, the student population,. EVIDENCE
SP/I 11.4 If needed, strategies to eliminate disproportionate discipline sanctions among identifiable student groups are evident. ^IDENCE: /2^,. ,7^^ l -d A J7/i 0 11.5 Classroom instruction proceeds in an orderly manner. EVIDENCE: (I r-TkAj^ t c:u. 'TL^ I'-Yi YES ') YES (Jt- 22.- NO NO NO YES^ YES NO NOEducationalEquity Monitoring Page 11 0 ___________________________ CRITERIA__________________ _ 11.6 How visible are the following persons in directing/controlling students? . the following for each person(s). Indicate one of CIRCLE ONE A. B. C. Very active/very visible Somewhat active/somewhat visible Not active/not visible Principal Assistant Principal(s) Teachers A Supervision Aides/Security EVIDENCE: >ervision :E: j/4, ..4^ Aidi 4 t 12.0 Building Leadership/Management In the desegregated setting, the principal must demonstrate a strong commitment tt_o educationa'l' equity. SP/O 12.1 The school has a clear, concise, well-written ye: NO Statement of EVIDENCE,*, C A f specific improvement goals.,
Jicf. AO/ '' J! t ------------------------------------------------- 12.2 The campus and building are clean and free of debris and graffiti EVIDENCE:, '7L^. YES, NO 12.3 Hallways EVIDENCE: IL derly 'ti' d are ^rd^ly, - - NO O O 't X 12.4 There is evidence that curriculum monitoring YES ) NO occurs. EVIDENCE: I^age 12 CRITERIA CIRCLE ONE .0/1 12.5 There is evidence that the guidance program provides equitable services to all students (i.e., counselor's YES NO T/Q /SP .cheduleindividual/group). (l~Y^. y rj.^JL Af.'u 12.6 District and school security guidelines are being followi PN'LP>P:SiQ.^'. '^^. l , TA xiL^ 'U^ T-YES NO ADDITIONAL OBSERVATIONS RELATIVE TO THE MONITORING VISIT: .____________________________ discipline manacement qvautcrly retort School Franklin Incentive Beginning Period QJ Cp ' Principa'.. Ending Period. PART I. Please indicate number of suspensions by race and category. \\ I A. Out of School Suspensions - Category 1 Violations Black TiMal Black While Total While Spanish T.ilal Span Asia/Fac Total Asia/ Pac Total InJ/ Elk Total Other TkHali I J- zz Total* column Ctiieo- riT 777 199( on 1 ontlo mg Ill- M F M F F M F M I F M n yiin J - Sb h'u 9 I o 5 3 i i 1 B. Long-Term Suspension - Category II Violations Cradei Black Total Black While Total White Spanish Total Span Aaia/Pac Total Alia/ Pac b4/Esk Total IndZ Elk Oiher ht Total Other Toiali I i 3 4 5 2- 2. 3- St M F I M F M F M F M F F Toult ?< column 4 i 1 iS C. Expulsions - Category III Violations T Gra Jet. Black Total Black While ToUl While Spaniih Total Span Asia/Pac r 1 -i2_ 3 2E Total Aaia/ Pac Ind/Esk Total Ind/ l-.ik Oiher Toul Other TsiUls M F l M F M F M F F M F 5 11 I TtMlIl per >olumn NOTE: Quarterly Reports are due in the Hearing Office one (1) week following the end of each Gradi Period. SEE REVERSE FOR PARTS 11, III AND IV.PART II. Please complete. NOIE: These fl NOTE: ni.a M Peinn'<ab H'Xrwrhi If.'tnuti San.-ljktfia Sprcal PART III. Teaching Fipcncfuie 0 3 4-10 li-iS 16-20 11-2S 26-30 30 Over Touli Grtdi K 9 If,Ures are to he included in Part I. Students on Sent Homes are not included in Patt 1. 1996 1 .taI Black w.l.lk- M Tot,I Spnnisli M 1 |. Total Span AsinO.' M I Foial Asia/ P.'ie hulVA M r Total InJ/ P k Oihcr M F Tpt,i Oil.vr T.'t.-N i I 1 it ! r I' Personal I'laia - Please indicate lecoinnicnding the various suspensions. race, .sex and experience of staff inenibilets- Bla-k mJ F Tuial bta-k ^1 Lj Total Volute Spanish I ' ToIaI S( an Asia/Piie ~ r 1 iital Asia/ Pae Ind'H.'k M I Total Ind/ I sk Other M I T.rial Other Touli I J PART IV. Id s r P-nrollmcnt Data - Please indicate and Race. liMal black V-hiie your school.s enrollment by Grade l evel, ,S, -i-ZHl M ^2 i' Tsital hilc Spoiiish M Total Span Air./p,c 2 ^3g Sr F Total Ab/ Poe M i- Total In.l/ i sk Other M F Total Other Toiah Per 3 4 5 6 Totali r>jr eolomn PK 51 0 J i W- & -L i I 1 0 1 i_ t^ 0 'p-ta .XL.., 3. I t. T 10 i4 1 STiJ. <rf? hPP- 1 2 G 1 : 2 4 PN P . 0 1 I. 1. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Franklin Incentive School 1701 South Harrison Phone 671-6380 Little Rock, Arkansas 72204 April 12, 1996 TO: Horace Smith FROM: Ethel Dunbar5 rincipal Mr. Smith, Please review the attached list of field trips by grade level. Please call, if there are questions. Hl w P R - 1 2 O 1 PM P . 0 Grade 6 1. 2 . 3 . United Artist Theatre - "Jumanj i" Capitol Palace - Chinese Cuisine" Hot Springs - Radford House Grade 5 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7 . 8. Territorial Restoration Old State House State Capitol Jumanj i Shorter College National Weather Service NLR NLR Power Co - Arkla Smart House Toltec Mounds Franklin Falcon Singers 1. 2. 3 . 4 . 5. 6. 1. 8. 9. Park Plaza Rosecare Nursing Home Franklin PTA Open House Washington Elementary School Cloverdale Elementary School Franklin Black History Program Hillcrest Community First Baptist Highland Park First Commercial Bank Downtown Little Rock 10. Franklin PTA Christinas Program 11. VIP's ReceptionLITTLE AOCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Franklin Incentive School 1701 South Harrison Phone 671-6300 Little Rock, Arkansas 72204 April 12, 1996 ATTENTION: PROSPECTIVE PARENTS LOCAL REALTORS, DAYCARE OWNERS, & Qraatings, rranXlin School is looking for bright, nthuaiastic leatnarai As part of our recruitment efforts, we are inviting incoming parents and children in the Tri District Pulaski County School zone A__________ _________1________ 1 J ________________JI _ M . .k to tour our building and "Check Os Out. M Wa are located in Central Little Rook. Franklin offers quality programs, competent staff members, smaller class size, Extended Day/Week activities and before and after school CARE. Please examine the brochure and share the good news with clients and friends. Don't hesitate to call us at 671-6380 between 7:45 A.M. and 3:05 p.m. sincerely. Q c Pamela Person-Theme specialist 5013744107 UALKER LAW FIRM 047 P02/04 SEP 17 90 16:52 John W. Walker^ P.a. Attorney At Law 1723 Broadway Dttle Rock. Arkansas 72206 :Telephone (5C1) 374-3758 : FAX (501) 374-4187 JOHN W. WALKER RALPH WASHINGTON XtARK BURNETTE AUSTIN PORTER, JR. Via Facsimile - 324-2146 September 17, 1998 Dr, Leslie Gamine Superintendent of Schools Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: Franklin Jncentive School Dear Dr. Gamine: J T P'^" commitments regarding Franklin Section 5.5 of the Revised Plan, "Incentive Schcois. This sectio: in reads: LRSD shall continue to provide double funding t "r '-tt_serv!ces depanmeni shall provide the. to Franklin, Garland. Mitchell... It fonher reads: "The clant necgssarvto preserve the comparable chvsieal equality oFthese schnnls JeallocX of'rXX ' ^O'ene -Joshua that she has received several calls from patrons and i ^'^*'71"CMtivc School indicating that there is much work to be done regardmg the physical condition of this builcing. I understand that a concerned parent aroup has alLdy They further ir.d.cate, in foeir opinion, student assignment and public relations &i c n ' assigned to Franklin from a viri or attendance zones and the Communications Department is not promoting Franklin with the much work to be done regarding 'ns. are not comparable Tom a variety announcements and articles, I am available to discuss this ma|ter with you. Ms. Sadie Mitchell or Mr. Junious Babbs the appropriate person who has responsibility for this area. or Also, I have not heard from you regarding my letter of .August 20 1998 staffing at Rockefeller Incentive School I convenience regarding the am attaching a copy of that letter for your I501374Z1S7 WALKER LAW FIRM 647 P0J/04 SEP 17 98 16:52 Page 2 - Letter to Dr. Leslie Gamine September 17, 1998 1 await a response from you. incerely. ( Joy C. Springer Joshua Intervenors JCS/ Enclosure cc: Mr. Julius Babbs Ms. Sadie Mitchell Mr. Chris Heller Mr. John W. Walker Ms. Lorene Joshua Ms. Ann Brown I I )5013744187 WALKER LAW FIRM 914 P02 OCT 01 98 15:10 r w 10^ Little Rock School District Associate Superintendent - Operations Phone (501)324-2009 FAX (501)324-2032 September 21,1998 Ms. Joy C. Springer Joshua Intervenors Walker Law Firm 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Dear Ms. Springer
I have been asked to respond to your correspondence It Gamine wherein you express concerns about the Franklin school fe 17, 1998, to Dr. [ding. You reference correspondence to Dr. Gamine from a group of parents regarding building concerns. Dr. Gamine has not received any correspondence from a parent group regarding the Franklin building, nor has any Cabinet member. I have located correspondence from Mrs. Dunbar of August 12, 1998, to Frances Cawthon, Assistant Superintendent. In the letter, she expressed a need for air conditioning to be purchased for the auditorium, referred to nonspecific roof leaks, a light fixture in need of repair, and requested the walls be repainted following summer school. She also wrote Mr. Doug Eaton on September 8,1998, in which she requested the installation of an air conditioning unit in the auditorium. Mr. Eaton responded to Mrs Dunbars request on September 14, 1998, and explained that the maintenance and operation budget does not fund capital projects such as the installation of an air conditioning unit at Franklin. The type of unit needed to cool the space requested would cost approximately $30,000. As there are no funds remaining for Franklin in the bond account, a project of this size must be deferred until the District raises additional capital funds through a millage campaign or a bond issue. Franklin does have an air conditioned cafeteria which is large enough in size to hold a PTA meeting or other comparable function Please be assured that the District remains committed to the maintenance and upkeep necessary to preserve the comparable physical equality of the Incentive schools. During the 1997-98 school year, from 7-1*97 to 6-30-98, there were 273 work orders logged and completed by the Facilities Servias Department at Franklin. This school year 83 work 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)324 2000 5013744187 UfiLKER LAtJ FIRM 914 P03 OCT 01 98 15:10 Ms. Joy C. Springer September 21,1998 Page 2 orders have been logged and completed since 7-1-98. Regarding roof leaks, Mrs. Dunbar states in her August 12 correspondence, Work orders are submitted, but most are not responded to . . During the 1997-98 school year eight work orders for roof leaks were logged
six repairs were completed One additional roof leak was reported on 9-15-98, and has not been repaired as of 9-21-98. Mrs. Dunbar further alludes to a pomise to repair a light fixture that fell from the ceiling in the auditorium in May 1998. She says, Plant Services was called, they came, gave us a temporary fix, promts^ to return, but havent. The promised repair was completed 7- 22-98. Mrs. Dunbar states, in her letter to Mr. Eaton,, but projects in other buildings that require funding are being completed Other capital projects that require expenditures of this magnitude are only being funded in schools where the pre-existing bond money was not already spent, as it has been at Franklin. Regrettably, the requested air conditioning unit for the auditorium cannot be funded at this time. When the District begins a capital campaign in the near future, the Franklin community may choose to make it a priority for their campaign. The Facilities Services Department will continue to respond to the work orders that it receives at Franklin in a timely and professional manner. Sincerely, Victor Anderson Associate Superintendent, Operations c Dr. Les Carnine Frances Cawthon Ethel Dunbar Doug EatonJohn W. Walker, RA. Attorney At Law 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 Telephone (501) 374-3758 FAX (501) 374-4187 RECB SEP 3 3 199^ JOHN W. WALKER RALPH WASHINGTON MARK BURNETTE AUSTIN PORTER, JR. OFFICE Or DESEGREGATION MONITORING Via Facsimile - 324-2032 September 28, 1998 Dr. Victor Anderson Associate Superintendent for School Operations Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: Franklin Incentive School Dear Dr. Anderson
I am in receipt of your letter in response of mind of September 17, 1998 regarding Franklin Incentive School. Thank you for same. The concerns previously referenced in my letter came as a result of parent concerns through Ms. Lorene Joshua. I do not have any knowledge of dialogue or conespondence between Ms. Dunbar, Ms. Cawthon, and Mr. Eaton. I do, however, have personal knowledge of the physical condition of the building having spent the 1998 spring semester there. The purpose of my letter was to bring to the administrations attention concerns from patrons of the District regarding the school and to remind the District of its commitment to maintain Franklin at a comparable level to other schools in the District. I again call your attention to Sections 5.5 and 2.9 of the Revised Plan. LRSD shall continue to provide double funding to Franklin, Garland, Mitchell...' . The plant services department shall provide the maintenance and upkeep necessary to preserve the comparable physical equality of these schools. 99 LRSD shall implement programs, policies and/or procedures designed to ensure an equitable allocation and/or reallocation of resources to LRSD schools. Moreover, the law of this case is that lack of funds cannot be used by the District as an excuse for not meeting plan commitments. It speaks volumes when you acknowledge that the principal of the school has on several occasions called to the attention of your Assistant Superintendent for Elementary Education and the Director of Plant Services the need to address the maintenance and upkeep of the Franklin School building. This is our point exactly. There is a commitment to double fund Franklin and to maintain its physical plant at a level equal to that of other schools in the District. It does not appear that this is being done. We, therefore, request that this be done. I will be happy to meet with you, Ms. Cawthon, Ms. Dunbar, Mr. Eaton and anyone else Page 2 - Letter to Dr. Victor Anderson September (iS,, 1998.,.. -I!-.:'?-- you choose to make sure that all parties are satisfied with the commitments that have been made. Please let me hear from you. jncerely, Joy C. Springer Joshua Intervenors JCS/ cc: Mr. John W, Walker Ms.AniiBrown Dr. Leslie Gamine Ms. Frances Cawthon Ms. Ethel Dunbar Mr. Doug Eaton Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 To
Franklin Parent Involvement Team RSCEWED OCT 1 S 1999 From:^Frances Cawthon, Assistant Superintendent OfflCEOF Date: October 13, 1999 mBnOKMONITORINQ Thank you for the concern you expressed regarding the nursing services at Franklin Academy. I, like you, would like to see a full time registered nurse in all of our schools. However, the way Franklin's budget is currently allocated will not allow for that service. The Campus Leadership Team may consider shifting resources to allow for a full-time nurse. This would be a campus-based decision including all members of the Campus Leadership Team. Many of our elementary schools that do not receive the extra benefits of double funding also have high percentages of students in the categories that you enumerated in your letter. While your students at Franklin do not receive as many services as we would like to provide, there is certainly no discriminatory treatment in the budget allocation. Although Franklin is still a double-funded school, they are currently over their double funding by approximately $80,000. Im sorry I couldnt give you a more satisfying answer. I do appreciate the interest, energy, and concern that the staff and parents have given expressing their ideas and making the inquiry. Please continue working through the Franklin Campus Leadership Team. Your combined efforts can assure the schools priorities are best met within the budgets capabilities. cc: Ann Brown John Walker Junious Babbs Ethel DunbarOctober 6, 1999 / igD Mrs, Frances Cawthon Assistant Superitendent OCT I 8 1999 RE: Nurse Rollins - Reduction of days at Franklin Elementary Dear Mrs. Cawthon: OfriCEOF OESEGREGAUCNMCNITORiNQ We the parents and staff of Franklin Elementary wish to express our concerns relative to the reduction of our schools nursing service. During the Incentive School inception, it was decided at the time (by the Courts) that each Incentive School would have additional staff that the area elementaries did not have. Those persons were identified as being a full-time nurse, social service worker, art specialist, music specialist, counselor, physical education, and a theme specialist. Double funding was established to support this extra staff and to aid with the desegregation efforts of identified schools. Over the past few years, from 1989 to the present, our students have had access to said persons to assist with their many educational, physical, social, and emotional needs. With the re-writing and Court approval of the new Desegregation Plan, changes have been made that has and continues to negatively impact Incentive Schools. First, class sizes increased, second, programs were eliminated, and now services are being denied. were Our children at Franklin School, for the most part, are in a high risk category. Many of these students come from homes where drugs are used, siblings are gang members, parents are incarcerated, education is not valued, little or no medical care is provided, and domestic violence is a way of life. The school nurse along with the counselor and social service worker functions as a team in securing and/or providing services for our students. u> According to recent research from At Risk to Excellence, 'Three decades of research on school reform has led to the identification of four basic elements that students need from their schools
relevant schoolwork, a nurturing and supportive environment, opportunities for academic success, and help with personal problems. Unfortunately, studies of schooling for students at risk of academic failure demonstrate that schools often fail to address the special circumstances including economic, family, community, ethnic, and racial statusthat characterize students placed at risk (Natriello, McDill, & Pallas 1990). We cannot afford to fail our students. Removing Nurse Rollins from our building two days per week is taking away, to a strong degree, the basic / element to provide assistance with personal problems. To reduce the day services of the school nurse at Franklin Elementary School means taking away a service that our students, parents, and staff need so desperately. Please know that Franklin is the largest Incentive School with the greatest need and should be given priority consideration when it comes to meeting the needs of the students and proposedOctober 6, 1999 Page 2 personnel cuts. The new Desegregation Plan states that the Incentive School would continue to receive double funding. We ask what is the purpose of the funding, if its not for programs and personnel. Dont make our students continue to suffer because of segregation practices of the past. For the sake of unitary status, it is imperative at this juncture, that all students are treated in an equitable manner. Our request is that serious consideration be given to reinstating our school nursing services to five days per week. Enclosed please find a petition and services provided for 1998-1999. Please provide a response to our principal and/or Parent Involvement Team at your earliest convenience. Thank you for our cooperation and understanding. Sincerely, Concerned Staff and Parents of Franklin Enclosures cc: Dr. Carnine, Superintendent Sadie Mitchell, Associate Superintendent Ann Brown, Director of ODEMSERVICE PROVIDED - 1998-1999 1. Number of times students seen for illness or injury: 4,^1^ 2. Number of students receiving a physical exam by nurse: 47 3. Daily average number of students who took medications at school. 4. Consultations v/ith Doctors, Pharmacists, Case Managers, Department of Human Services, Arkansas Childrens Hospital 52 5. Health Fair during Fall Fest. 6. Classes - 59 7. Parent Conferences & Home Visits 29 8. Student Immunizations given. 137 9. Staff & B Skin Tests. 10. Faculty Conferences. 100 11. Faculty Health Assessment. SU 12. Pupil Service Team Meetings 9 13. All students were weighed and measured 7 14. Vision Screening 419 16 Referred 15. Hearing Screening 419 2 Referred 16. Dental Screening 108 79 Seen by Dentist All these services will be decreased but especially, #2, #4, #6, #7, #8, #10, #11 and #16. All of the above services were provided at Franklin School. In addition , our nurse was often requested to assist at other locations.PARENT PETTnON % Please sign this petition if you are concerned about our nursing services being reduced from five (5) days to three (3) days!! Parents Name Address <2^QCCSG<Ji 'Ci y' Cl^M 722.{^ /i ,^/ L 1 ttf In -p k ^,e4>e. c Rf}. SelSC'ZZ,^ 1^3 G>C,Cryii 7(.W eddl^/a:Ji rr- - -. .M ,^- - ~ A ]^zvy^ ^icL^ Ln-triecc iTf&iiu Zip Code 722z>< 7Z?d2 7/^^/ 72ZQZ^ ~1].'2-OC 77ZO4' 7^1^ 72.202 Students Name ^(^^2 Qouu Grade 5____ 1^ iz. t &s* 027o-M.^ ^111^7277^ 11X6 7223^ ''la/n/Mmi^hf^ z ^ll~l &l/ol. 7Z2O^ 7sa!l 7z ^chxC'k Rt-v.0<y ^0 AP.^SkxykJU ecKZ^/4<v\p/L 9 zr> Z1 JiUuXLr) '^2k:LL22zL I r I t 2:.ccxqJtjlz2 ^nuAjiy^ .^L? CaV Fr.W j)r. /fbMi4^|(p 311) 5 (/cheC ^17) -^^^UJC)r27 w it. T 1^7 iPARENT PETITION Please sign this petition if you are concerned about our nursing services being reduced from five (5) days to three (3) days!! Parents Name Address Zip Code 'IZZiZ ^^4 >Ai2^ XA{/thvQ> Tq'i?^A)L ^^pssLrrvA,r'-i Students Name Grade ! k>l X S , 'j ^i/xAoM'_kZ A 1^ hJ (z ! /I ~ . MM /M'^ '^6d'V->-ks^ (ajuAoo/ Cil^ 2 2^.qV 19^^ 4-r'4<XcU. ^c>iK^Aa>\ ______ * vkEckAA 2r< 5/3^ I ) .-<Tp~rl__A(g/AxA-^ . SfT? J 1 A A/n a^\.A4, vy^Lyi1( j v n ihKo.StUcfeH &ttofcsjMKidi rg^ A'^rc^ i'7 i C^ a El ) 23(9^12J [G?c>l 5Qn f -A 222^1 7'3-- r 7^7! -A ( ^. ffl ^CEi ^^Ktg^LzsTaode sis^ :C Ct^ PARENT PETITION Please sign this petition if you are concerned about our nursing services being reduced from five (5) days to three (3) days!! Parents Name Address -5 If Zip Code / r Students Name Grade 1 /6/(7KU7 ^ka/lPiCn Q^ I V<i-fA6cA^ SD n ^rrru)7^J^ Hu W lih I wV _ I^QI kUad'^^-f- 5!9P CkfdAc) <8^137)^ 21 ir n '<^(2t'{r, 7^^ 0(-- 122^Q f -^ii Si'll 21 pk i><-4 t 1^- K>i~w iWiT.. '-Si <2h^ by^^^^pQ^Ovivo.Ir, U ^3^ Ho/^2^ b poi ^T,| Id
'll I * m i fc^*i.awr IT I , ..^, t5^Acxr>J<^'^ ViiWctvQ 5 S. CftCt^SlbSm I a c\Q-/V'C<T-^-vo7V A< l([_PARENT PETITION Please sign this petition if you are concerned about our nursing services being reduced from five (5) days to three (3) days!! Parents Name 7 Address SloM 210^ /y '~~-V^ ^Z^XX j 0 UfAA izTOrifTOh^- cA/mj (J, i-ee,! ^^73~t^eG? QAM%Vx-j -f >a. lUilO dl-l -dn d 5- (A(k(b^ 2U-^ctca.J,4(e7^C Zip Code 7'^^04 7o)3(}4^ 72A-2,d^) 774 072^ -i-im laxxt^ I I "ns-^B ^Vl^' rxx-S-^ i 7 ' Students Name Ldc^ 1 Grade "V ^TTr" _!<____ PiAc} I ^jhiKu I ) le,AcXcQ.r I \ /c^-r>/7<Ai^ VAI dtc A n^^7K7( (WhiAym --L 5 I. t 1 fre-K K lc_ c bic4n/^ ddrf-SS k\air{aD(ijWJ/nny.'^ 3: Tph PARENT PETITION Please sign this petition if you are concerned about five (5) days to three (3) days!! our nursing services being reduced from Parents Name c Address Zip Code Students Name Grade _Ljndzf. C><2 2o p) 4ts> 2saj-iE/(f'P^ SP, i-<<L <^13.5.0 a ' 9Jr>l 3-ftas^,^r, ' n'2-j:,<ii /6I^ /^ K 15/^ S/ Uor-r
Sr>7x ZV/jP. cu^ t-^v >-
' 5 Vra 'Ph,lljps//y&C6 ^c~, r -7^^! .77/a Att~] IWr. IW^PSL >O-tn<\ rOo(Qai^ mP:kr\^o\K\ ?Z2o4 Sj'k MUi^ ^D/ot^rf^a', Ifi-ti ^-o/Ci= \A/,jl',^_ p^rwf 3^-^y SMvc lA-^ fpri Oloy a K W>^Af> ix>ep?(^ >l ' tP / /y 3 JQKa S pgQj. fr!t^v3 C26jC^^C^y^_^/)Q^Qx>^ZItr aPARENT PETITION Please sign this petition if you are concerned about our five (5) days to three (3) days!! nursing services being reduced from Parents Name Address p\l LR Zip Code qaji3- 7351 a, Students Name Grade j5Z er IOffice of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham. Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 To: Frances Jones From: Melissa Guldin/A^ Subject: Franklin Nurse Date: October 28, 1999 As we discussed this morning, I have been reviewing the correspondence regarding the reduction of the Franklin nurse from a full-time position to one that is .6 FTE. I have copies of the petition signed by Franklin parents and staff and your memo responding to their concerns. Elements of your memo have raised questions about the budget that neither I nor Skip Marshall could find answers to in the September 1, 1999 LRSD Budget. In the second paragraph of your memo, you note that Franklin (or possibly the incentive schools as a whole?) are over their double funding by approximately $80,000. No matter how we compared budget projections and actual budgets or expenditures, we never arrived at any difference of $80,000. Could you please send further explanation for how that figure was determined? I would also appreciate receiving a copy of the formula that the district used to allocate the nursing staff among the elementary schools. When we talked, you mentioned state requirements for nursing services, but I do not have a copy of that allocation formula. Thank you for taking time to look into this matter. I look forward to hearing from you. CC: Ethel DunbarCAWTHON, FRANCES H. From: Sent: To: MILHOLLEN, MARK Tuesday, November 16,1999 10:51 AM CAWTHON, FRANCES H.. Recently you asked for information concerning Franklin's budget for 99-00 & double funding.Historically when the calculations have been made for double funding they are made as a group & not for individual schools However in an attempt to allocate by school I made an allocation for you as follows: based on previous enrollment numbers Franklin makes up approximately 28% of the total Incentive school enrollment I took 28% of the projected difference between expenditures & actual obligations $285,166.41 (9/1/99 budget tab 6) & arrived at 79,846.59 which I rounded off to 80,000 Hope this answers your question Post-It .TW brand fax transmittal memo 7671 *ot pages y To Co. Van bar Co. 667 Dept. Fax? Phone # Fax# 1LH A/ ^kOCK school district 'ifl Division of School Services Sadie Mitchell, Associate Superintendent NOV 2 8-1999 TO: Melissa Gouldin omcEOh desegregation M0NIT0R1II6 FROM: Frances Cawthon DATE: November 19. 1999 SUBJECT: Franklin Nurse I have attempted to address each of the questions you've raised, so that everyone has clarity and the same understanding on each of these issues. The allocation of nursing services was refigured for all schools for the 1999-2000 school year due to the sixth graders moving into the middle school program and changing the enrollment at all elementary schools. The state requirement for nurses is one per school district with a recommendation for one per thousand students. The Little Rock School District's ratio is one per 775 students at the elementary schools. Because the new plan does not stipulate any differences among area schools, Franklin Academy, whose enrollment at that time was 459, was given the same allocation as all other area schools. Please see Mark Milhollen's attached response to the budget question on the overage of Franklin's budget. These figures are based on the September 1, 1999 budget calculations. If there is further clarification needed, perhaps Mr. Marshall and Mr. Milhollen could meet and work on specific numbers based on the October 1, 1999 report and see if there is any misunderstanding about the method of calculation. Thanks for your patience in waiting for my response. Let me know if you have further questions. Cc Ethel Dunbar 810 W. Markham Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 www.lrsd.kl2.ar.us 501-324-2000 fax
501-324-2032) AHciiisas DciiiocnK i^7!<l,">jzc((c I--------------------------------------------------------------------------. LR classroom burned in possible arson I I 1 t I ni I.- I it - k' ) ? i B ti '^i I Wf O-,- 'iw JU,,. f'l '^ 1 (wphine niomton, a custodian al Franklin Elenienla^ School in Lillie Rock 9llS Fir InSDAcInr r^Hnrfoc .....* _________I If f. * .*11- ci.f. i_ . z<. . fl-------- .w.i.M.,. t_.cii.viiiaiy ovnvuj Hi UHUO nuUK, -Ils Fjre Inspector Charles Dowers how a classroom was arranged before a lite Aikniisns Donioctat Gnzotlo/BEIMJAMIN KGAIN broke out irt the room caily Sunday morning. Principal Ethol Dunbar said the school would return to "business os usual" today. Fire BY DOUG in-Tl-RS ARKANSAS WSUK R.\ I-li-VI I IT Fnmi his vunluRe point on the bulletin board near the door of Franklin Elcinentao's Hoorn tUHI Sunday aReriioon, a cardboard Santa Claus looked out on twisted nuorescent lights, a melted and warped computer, a pile of sog.t
v. charred ceiling tiles and walls blackened with greasy soot. Early that morning, .someone apparently set fire to the room, used every school day by 11 fourth-, nilh- and si.xlh grade special-education students. Now, a little more than 12 hours aflcr the blaze, cleanup was about to begin. The room won't be back in service until at least next semester, said Les ('amine. Little Hock School District superintendent. And although firefighters isolated tlie blaze to a single classroom, Uic more than 50 computers - 30 of them purchased last year - in the room next door will be out of service for several weeks. The smell of smoke permeated rooms all down the hallway. Nevertheless. Principal Ethel Dunbar said tlie school, al 1701 S. Harrison St., would return to business ns usual" today. School officials will find other spaces for the 11 displaced students, she said. Dunbar spent much of Sunday morning contacting the school's faculty and staff members to tell them that classes would go on. She wasn't sure, tliough. how teachers See FIRE, Page 38 Continued from Page 1B and students would react to news of the su.spected arson. "I will say that our studeiit.s and staff are veiy resilient," she said. The school has an alarm system. Dunbar said, and prior to Sunday morning, there hadn't been a break in for several months. A guard monitored the building and grounds Sunday night. Little Rock lirefigliter.s took the call at 12:30 a.in. and spent nearly four hours al the school. Capt. Harrell Davis said. Al- I though initial fire reports did not mention what, if any. substances were used to fuel the fire, a Little Hoi k police onirer n lio lespond ed to the school's break-in alarm Sunday morning saw that a win dow near the blaze bad been bro ken out and the trim around it was pulled back. Although Carnine said insur ance adjusters bad notyeteslimat- ed the damage, fire dcpartnient of- ficial.s put the toll at about $100,000 - the same as the deductible on the di.strict.s insurance policy, according to spokesman Suellen Vann. "You don't worry about things that can be replaced. Carnine said. He was grateful that no one was in the building when the fire broke out shortly alter midnight, and that the damage wa.s confined to a small area. "When you look at something like this." he said, it could have n |iilArkansas Democrat (gazette FRIDAY, JUNE 3,1994 SB Two schools in disrepair, monitor tells Wright I BY DANNY SHAMEER Democrat-Gazette Education Writer The federal monitor in the Pulaski County school desegregation case alerted the judge Thursday to leaky roofs and damaged floors at two Little Rock inner-city elementary schools. Those schools, virtually allblack in enrollment, get double funding and have special academic themes to enhance the education programs as part of a $129.75 million desegregation settlement with the state. Ann S. Brown, who runs the Office of Desegregation Monitoring, reported to the federal court that repairs are needed at Franklin and Mitchell incentive schools. She wrote in the letter attached to the report that the Little Rock School District in petitioning the court to close Stephens Incentive School cites the buildings condition and structural problems as one of the reasons. Quick attention to facility needs should help the district avoid any appearance that it is Plan would close 2 LR primary schools The parties in the Pulaski County school desegregation case proposed closing two inner-city elementary schools that get double funding Thursday. If U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright approves, the Little Rock School District could close Stephens and Garland incentive schools. The agreement signals a shift in the Joshua intervenors position. The intervenors, who represent black families, have fought closing incentive schools before. Under the agreement: Stephens would close this month and be rebuilt elsewhere by 1996, when it would failing to maintain incentive schools as a basis for eventually closing them due to deterioration, Brown wrote in a letter to U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright. reopen as a magnet school with a faculty that is at least 40 percent black. Stephens students could attend Garland, which would close in 1996, when Garland students would attend the new school. The new school, also named Stephens, would have 700 students, primarily from the Little Rock district. Some Pulaski County Special School District students would attend. No set number is promised. The new school would have a basic education program that may change only on Henry Superintendent Williams recommendation. based on educational and financial reasons. Dorsey Jackson, Little Rock School Board president, said in a telephone interview Thursday that if Brown is implying the district is letting the buildings deteriorate on purpose, shes wrong. There is no master plot by the Little Rock School District to close the incentive schools, Jackson said. Jackson said the problem is that incentive schools arent doing the job they were set out to do because the plan is ill-conceived. But he said the district would carry out the plan. Ninety-five percent of the community wants neighborhood schools, Jackson said. The. other 5 percent read too many sociology books. ."e Browns report said that Franklins cafeteria ceiling has holes and the ceiling of the principals office collapsed a few weeks before the monitoring visit. The report noted that rainwater floods underneath doors into one office and a classroom, and ceiling and floor tiles have deteriorated. At Mitchell, the report said that the district hasnt repaired ceiling leaks, a set of stairs tilts, and some floor tiles are loose.Arkansas Democrat aze^ TUESDAY. DECEMBER 13,1994 Report alleges teacher ordered boys beating A Little Rock substitute teacher ordered students to beat up a classmate, sending the child to the hospital Dec. 5, according to a police report released Monday. Eugene Pitts, 11, of 2005 Lewis St. was struck several times at Franklin Elementary after the substitute teacher encouraged the childs classmates to attack him, the report said. Pitts grandmother. Ruby Irvien, took the boy to the hospital after school. Irvien said she was angry about the schools initial handling of the incident. They didnt let him call me from school, she said. He was in pain. He had some bruised ribs. The youth was treated at Arkansas Childrens Hospital for injuries to his nose and ribs. The Little Rock School District and state Department of Human Services are investigating the incident.AikansasDemocrat^^^^ttc THURSDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1994 Teacher charged after 5th-graders beat classmate BY JIM BROOKS to maintain discipline in her Democrat-Gazette Staff Water rOOm, a police ^davlt said. ' J Pitts IS a chronic discipline ^rouTof problem at the school and was fighting with another student when Howard intervened, district officials said Wednes- Substitute teacher Amanda Howard laughed as a children beat ll-year-oid Eugene Pitts at her bidding. Little Rock police said. Police said Howard, arreted day. up the Wednesday on a second-de^ee Russell Mayo, as- assault warrant stopped a De^ ^te superintendent. She 5 brawl at Franklin Elementa^ sociate sup^ejin School only after one _ oy said. Go at it,and stepped fr^ between them. Another student suggest^ that they all take their tun^ him, and she didnt opp(^ that, said Mayo. Howard surrendei^ Wednesday at Little Rock pol^ peatedly punched Pitts in the Investigators said Howard, 25, of 2002 Scotty Court grew frustrated at Pitts repeated disruptions of the class she was supervising Dec. 5 at the school at 1700 S. Harrison St. ho^nuarters on a second-de* class gree assault warrant. She wasS^ So she encouraged tneomer she wasSs. students in the fifth-grade clas gr g^^ation to appear in LitJ to beat Pitts, police said. W Ie sued a cira^n pp as many as 10 students includ- ^le Rock MWai ing, some girls, toine^d injhe ^J^^ers investigators w^ told that Howard was laughM as the attack took place. io students, uiK joined in the melee, the children who actually beat Pitts will not be charged, police said. They basically were following the instructions of their teacher, said Lt. Charles Ho - Geniasici,< laday, police spokesman. Jofi^e detective. So she thert Howards instruction to the p ASSAULT, Page WB class was an apparent attempt u
ne anacK. luur. - And then, he (Pitts) star^ ino and there was one Kia crying, and who was really getting some licks in, said Gray Lemaste^^a Assault Continued from Page 1B stepped in and said, Thats enough. The director of the agencys Children and Family Services Division said DHS cooperated with Little Rock police in a coordinated investigation. Police took primary respon- Pitts was treated at Arkansas sibility for interviewing her, and Childrens Hospital for injuries of his nose and ribs. He was re- , leased the same day. we did interviews with the children, said Beverly Jones. Howard had been a substi- Hospital workers notified the tute classroom aide for the last Little Rock Police Department two months, Mayo said. She has and the state Department of Hu- been removed from the districts man Services. The school district, substitute list, he said. viewing the incident as a routine ___ Pitts ^andmother said the boy ' fight between students, did not was feeling better Wednesday. ' report the incident to police. Hes been going to school every day, said Ruby Irvien. Im supposed to go up there in the morning and talk to the principal. Second-degree assault occurs when a person. . . recklessly engages in conduct which creates a substantial risk of physical injury to another person. The Class B misdemeanor carries a punishment of up to 90 days in jail and a fine of no more than $500. Howard came to Little Rock police headquarters to sign the citation but was also held for Maumelle authorities, who had an active hot check warrant for her..Arkansas Democrat Odette 1 I Sub teacher at thrashing has rap sheet 5th-graders in melee wont be charged BY CHRIS REINOLDS Democfal-Gazett Staff Writer A substitute teacher charged with encouraging a group of fifth- graders to beat a classmate has a criminal record dating back to 1989, Little Rock police said. Amanda Howard, a Little Rock School District substitute aide, was arrested Wednesday on a second-degree assault warrant. Police said Howard laughed as a group of fifth graders beat 11- year-old Eugene Pitts at her bidding Dec. 5. Howard, 25, of 2002 Scotty Court stopped the brawl at Franklin Elementary School only after boy repeatedly one punched Eugene in the face, police said. Investigators said that after growing frustrated at Eugenes repeated disruptions of the class she was supervising, Howard en couraged the other pupils to beat the boy. Although as many as 10 joined in the melee, the children who actually beat Eugene will not be charged, police said. The incident isnt Howards first brush with the law. She was convicted of theft of property in Pulaski County Circuit Court in 1989 and sentenced to four years in jail, police record.s show. And Howard was charged with aggravated assault and disorderly conduct in 1990 and interfering with a police investigation in 1989. The aggravated assault and disorderly conduct charges were dismissed, police spokesman Terry Hastings said. Records on the interference charge werent available Thursday evening. On Wednesday, when Howard was appeared at the Little Rock Police Department on the misdemeanor battery warrant, she was detained on a hot-check warrant out of Maumelle as well. Police records also show Howard used the alias Kim Moore and was assigned an FBI number routinely given to someone convicted of a felony. Richard Hurley^ human resources director for the school district, said the district doesn't conduct routine background checks on substitutes, though checks are performed on security guards and workers who su-' pervise the before-and-after-, school day-care programs. Howard denied being a convicted felon on her application, Hurley said. School district officials conduct background checks only if they are unsure or suspicious of a potential employee. Hurley said the cost of background checks is one of the reasons the checks are not routine. District officials have said. they are reviewing their hiring: policies.Arkansas Democrat THURSDAY, DECEMBER 22,1994 Teacher pleads innocent in student fight BY OLIVIER UYTTEBROUCK Democrat-Gazette Police Reporter Jr. & substitute Little Rock teacher Amanda Howard pleaded innocent Wednesday to allegations that she told a class of fifth-graders to beat an unruly classmate and then laughed during the beating. Howard, 25, also pleaded innocent to an unrelated charge of harassing communications for A allegedly calling her ex- I' t V - Amanda Howard boyfriends workplace as many as 18 times on one day in 1992. Howard, of 2002 Scotty Court, is scheduled for trial Jan. 19 on both misdemeanor charges in Little Rock Municipal Court. Little Rock police said Howard encouraged her students to attack 11-year-old Eugene Pitts after she grew frustrated by his repeatedly disrupting a Dec. 5 class at Franklin Elementary School, 1700 S. Harrison St. in Little Rock. Howards instruction to the class was an apparent attempt to maintain discipline in her room, police wrote in an affidavit. Police wrote that Howard stood by and laughed while up to 10 students, a majority of the class, attacked the boy. One boy repeatedly punched Eugene in the face, police said. Howard eventually broke up the fight after Pitts began crying, police and Little Rock School District officials said. District officials did not report the attack. Police were notified by Arkansas Childrens Hospital employees after they treated Eugene for injuries to his nose and ribs. He was released the same day. Regarding the harassing communications charge, workers at a Little Rock business told police Howard began calling the business Oct. 15, 1992, and laughing or leaving the line open, police wrote in an affidavit. Howards ex-boyfriend worked at the business, police wrote. On Oct. 31, 1992, police put a trap on the business phone. That day they traced 18 calls made from Howards phone to the business.Arkansas Democrat j I Sub teacher at tlirashing has rap sheet 5th-graders in melee wont be charged BY CHRIS REINOLDS Democrat-Qazette Staff Writer A substitute teacher charged with encouraging a group of fifth- graders to beat a classmate has a criminal record dating back to 1989, Little Rock police said. Amanda Howard, a Little Rock School District substitute aide, was arrested Wednesday on a second-degree assault warrant. Police said Howard laughed as a group of fifth-graders beat 11- year-old Eugene Pitts at her bidding Dec. 5. Howard, 25, of 2002 Scotty Court stopped the brawl at Franklin Elementary School only boy repeatedly after one punched Eugene in the face, police said. Investigators said that after growing frustrated at Eugenes repeated disruptions of the class she was supervising, Howard encouraged the other pupils to beat the boy. Although as many as 10 joined in the melee, the children who actually beat Eugene will not be charged, police said. The incident isnt Howards first brush with the taw. She was convicted of theft of property in Pulaski County Circuit Court in 1989 and sentenced to four years in jail, police records show. And Howard was charged with aggravated assault and disorderly conduct in 1990 and interfering with a police investigation in 1989. The aggravated assault and disorderly conduct charges were dismissed, police spokesman Terry Hastings said. Records on the interference charge weren't available Thursday evening. On Wednesday, when Howard was appeared at the Little Rock Police Department on the misdemeanor battery warrant, she was detained on a hot-check warrant out of Maumelle as well. Police records also show Howard used the alias Kim Moore and was assigned an FBI number routinely given to someone convicted of a felony. Richard Hurley^ human re-. sources director for the school district, said the district doesnt conduct routine background. checks on substitutes, though checks are performed on security guards and workers who su-' pervise the before-and-after-. school day-care programs. Howard denied being a convicted felon on her application. Hurley said. School district officials con-' duct background checks only if they are unsure or suspicious of a potential employee. Hurley said the cost of background checks is one of the reasons the checks are not routine. District officials have said, they are reviewing their hiring I policies.Arkansas Democrat (gazette FRIDAY, JANUARY 20,1995 Substitute teacher gets 90 days in jail for urging classmates to beat 5th-grader punishes only conduct, not speech. Howard BY OLIVIER UYTTEBROUCK Democral-GazeHs Police Reporter A judge Thursday handed a 90-day jail sentence to former substitute tteeaacchheerr Amanda Howard after four fifth-graders testified she told them to beat up an 11-year-old classmate. Though their testimony differed in some details, all four Franklin Elementary School students said Howard gave the command, then laughed while as many as 10 students joined in the Dec. 5 beating. She said: Everybody kick his I butt, a 10-year-old boy testified Thursday. Those were her exact words. A second witness, a 10-year-old girl, said Howards words were: All yall kick his A. Little Rock Municipal Judge Lee Munson commended both students as good witnesses before he con- V
< She plans to appeal the misdemeanor conviction, Padilla said Thursday. remained free Iw victed Howard of sec- Howard ond-degree assault. Munson rejected the argument of Howards attorney, Fernando Padilla, who said that the second-degree assault statute Thursday on a $2,500 appeal bond. Little Rock School District officials did not report the attack. Police were notified by Arkan-sas Childrens Hospital employees after they treated Eugene Pitts for injuries to his nose and ribs. The boy was reSee TEACHER, Page 10B Teacher Continued from Page 1B leased the same day. In her own testimony, Howard acknowledged she told the stu-lents that she wouldnt interfere f they beat 11-year-old Eugene. Howard said she made the statement after Eugene hit several students in the class a claim Eugene denied in court Thursday. Howard testified she planned to send Eugene to the principals office for talking and disturbing the physical education class. When she called him to the front of the class, Eugene at first refused, Howard said. Other students testified that a student made a comment to Eugene, who responded by grabbing " the other boys neck. A third boy entered the fight at that point, , striking Eugene, one student tes- tified. Howard then told the class to attack Eugene, students said. In Thursdays testimony, the numbers of students involved in j the fight varied from four to 10. Students said Howard sat behind her desk and laughed during the attack, which lasted a minute to three minutes before Howard intervened, students said. Police wrote in an affidavit that one boy repeatedly punched Eugene in the face. Howard - broke up the fight after the boy
began crying, police wrote. a I Arkansas Democrat \^(6azclU' FRIDAY.JylARCH 29. 1996 Teen-ager stabbed in back in brawl A teen-ager playing basketball Wednesda.v allenioon at a Little Hock elenientary school was slabbed in the back in a brawl in volving about a dozen other youths. police sail!. The injured 17 year-old told police he was playing basketball on an outdoor court at Franklin Elenientary about 6 pan. when a fight started involving 10 to 15 other teen agers. The teen-ager told police someone stabbed him in the back during the fight, but he could not describe the assailant. He was treated at Ar-kansa. s Children s Hospital. Police said the wound did not appear to be life threatening. Arkansas Demcxzrat azettc TUESDAY, DECEMBER 9, 1997 i Schbol assesses ! i damage,sleuths seek fire, source Engineers inspected Franklin Elementary School for structural damage Monday, a day after a suspected arson destroyed a specialeducation classroom and saturated a wing of the Little Rock school with smoke. Students attended their normal classes, while cleanup crews scoured the damaged wing and fire investigators looked for the cause of the fire. As of Monday evening, investigators hadnt pinpointed the source of the fire, said Robert Jones..Little Rock School District director of securitj. Engineers also had not concluded the extent of structural damage, if any, Jones said. Fire officials estimated the damage at $100,000 the same amount as the districts insurance deductible but claims adjusters for the self-insured school district havent released a dollar amount. Jones said he expects the structural report and damage estimate to be completed today or Wednesday. Fire investigators did not com- ment on their inquiry, other than to say the blaze is still considered a suspicious fire. Ethel Dunbar, the schools prin- I cipal, wouldnt comment Monday on the fire or the investigation.Arkansas Democrat '^ (gazette THURSDAY, MAY 28. 1998 ~ w Tl k! \ J d I./
' B-A itrr' .W' tfR[O Ct^ fi< "f u .J! Ill 'X l?9j ^j>i Sfj 1/ t\ T' Arkansas Democrat-Gazette/RICK McFARLAND '' ./. I'f. t I ? I 1 ' Franklin Incentive Elementary School pupils color a poster at the school. Little Rock's Public Works Department spon- Wednesday to promote Stuff It! Little Rock Recyc-l es,. a- c ol.- sored the book, intended to educate children about recy-oring and activity book featuring writing and art by students cling. 42 pupils recycling prose, art becoming a book ARKANSAS DEMOCR,\T-U,\ZETTE Nearly 50 young artists and writers from Franklin Incentive Elementary School in Little Rock are getting published. And they may increase environmental awareness along the way. Art and 25-word essays from 42 students at the school are being printed in a 50-page coloring and activity book sponsored by Little Rocks Public Works Department. The city is the schools Partner in Education. The book, Stujf It! Little Rock Recycles, was unveiled at a morning press conference at the school Wednesday. Distribution of the book will begin in the fall. An initial printing of about 100 enabled the city to give each of the contributing pupils copies. The city hopes to produce about 600 copies in the fall and is seeking a corporate sponsor to help pay for printing costs. The books will be distributed at exhibits and functions that Public Works employees attend throughout the year. Dan McFadden, spokesman with the city, said the students were shown a video on recycling and given general guidelines about the type of art they should create. Karon Lawson, the art teacher at Franklin, worked with the children on the project. One little 10-year-old girl wrote
T feel so happy when I know my family and friends are recycling, it makes me want to sing. and then she drew the musical notes, McFadden said. WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 2003 'Dental team gives Franklin pupils screenings THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Pupils at Franklin Elementary School received free dental screenings Tuesday as part of the Dental Health Action Teams Future Smiles pro- . gram. , With parental permission,
pupils received tooth sealants plastic coatings applied to teeth to protect them from cavitycausing bacteria. The team was a group of dental health, education and community professionals that serves about 1,800 children in Little Rock public schools. The program, led by the state Department of Healths Office of Oral Health and the University of Arkansas at Little Rocks Share America, emphasizes prevention and purchases portable equipment to do the screenings through a grant from the Delta Dental Plan of Arkansas.STAFF PEVELOPMEWT - CERTIFIED STAFF TOTAL NUMBER OF CERTIFIED STAFF Number Completing Prior to 1991-92 * Number Completing During 1991-92 TRAINING RELATED TO EDUCATIONAL EQUITY Prejudice Reduction Human Relations Interpersonal Cross-Cultural Communication MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY Learning Styles/Modes Curriculum Infusement STRATEGIES THAT ENHANCE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Teacher Expectations and Student Achievement (TESA) IDEA School Improvement Training Cooperative Learning Steps to Effective Teaching Gifted and Talented Reading Whole Language Mathematics - Elementary (Secondary Subject Areas - List Under "OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT") High Scope Computer Program For Effective Teaching (PET) 1 cycle 2 cycles 3 cycles Assertive Discipline Classroom Management Parent-Teacher Conferences EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES Equitable Staffing Practices OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT (SPECIFY) These data should * To be completed at the end of the third nine weeks. Do not include staff be for completed staff development activities, development activities scheduled for 4th nine weeks (1991-1992). iSTAFF DEVELOPMEWT - SUPPORT STAgg TOTAL NUMBER OF SUPPORT PERSONNEL Number Completing Prior to 1991-92 * Number Completing During 1991-92 TRAINING RELATED TO EQUITY DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT PARENT/COMMUNITY RELATIONS OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT (SPECIFY) These data should * To be completed at the end of the third, nine weeks, be for completed staff development activities. De development activities scheduled for 4th nine weeks (1991--1992) . Do not include staff Do not send to Planning, Research, and Evaluation office.I i I I QUARTERLY DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT REPORT Insert or have available a copy of the most recent report for current school year. This report should be available at the time of the monitoring visit. I nn not send to Planning. Research A and Evaluation office.MAP OF SCHOOL PLANT Insert a copy of the map of the school plant.EXTEMPED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS PROGRAM GRADE BM BP WM WF OM OP TOTAL Governor's School AEGIS Bovs' State Girls' State Summer Laureate Odyssey of the Mind Math Olympiad Others (Please Specify) TOTAL List any educational programs that are conducted outside the * Include the most current information. normal school day. Complete and return to Planning, Research, and Evaluation office.SCHOOLWIDE 8TPDENT HONORS/AWARDS Complete one each grading period. First Nine Weeks WHITE BLACK OTHER Honor/Award Grade MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTAL TOTAL Include the most current information, i.e., scholarship, citizenship, athletic honors/awards, etc. Do not send to Planning, Research, and Evaluation office.SCHOOLWIDB STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS Complete one each grading period. Second Nine Weeks WHITE BLACK OTHER Honor/Award Grade MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTAL TOTAL Include the most current information, i.e., scholarship, citizenship, athletic honors/awards, etc. nn send to Planning, Research, and Evaluation office.SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HOWORB/AWARDS Complete one each grading period. Third Nine Weeks WHITE BLACK OTHER Honor/Award Grade MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTAL TOTAL Include the most current information, i.e., scholarship, citizenship, athletic honors/awards, etc. ASCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS Complete one each grading period. Fourth Nine weeks WHITE BLACK OTHER Honor/Award Grade MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTAL TOTAL Include the most current information, i.e., scholarship, citizenship, athletic honors/awards, etc. Do not send to Planning, Research, and Evaluation office.COMMITTEE WHITE JIALE EMPLOYEES FEMALE PLACE MALE FEMALE SCHOOL dOMMITTEEB/PRREHTM, mvOLVEMEHT OTHER WHITE P?lRElfr8 ! PATROMS HALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE BLACK MALE FEMALE OTHER WHITE OFFICERS MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE FEMALE OTHER MALE FEMALE P L H c y tiAte, aclal Committee ent Teacher Aasoc ES. rent Workahopa lease Specify Others) lotes List membership of all school committees, Including committees composed if parents/patrons, staff merobers, or a combination of parents and staff. lave available upon request documentation concerning physical involvement ixamples of such documentation are the VIPS' Sign-in Roster, notices of various school functions, items of publicity about parent participation, etc. It is not lecessary to provide monitors with a sign-in sheet of attendance at PTA etc. leetings. )uplicate as needed. Complete and return to Planning, Research, and Evaluation office.EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES T I V I T Y t CLUB ___WHITE BMPBRBHIP BLACK ,L1 EMALE OTHER ha: tALB 8_ B-L-L lALB : C K EMa: O-T-H MALE OrnCERS/LEADERSHIP POSITIONS iJB. R_L-A tALB J OTHER lAIiB_ Jisai K T B P O W 8 O R n C K Include information I report should include membership information. irding sponsors and officer positions. In addition, include student Decs of cosuoittees. licate as needed. raplete and return to Planning, Research, and Evaluation office.STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT/ASSESSMENT DATA Please insert or have available the reports provided by the Planning, Research, and Evaluation Department.8TUDEWTS RETAINED include only those students retained at grade At the secondary level. --------------- Do not include failures of-individual gpvrses... level white GRADE LEVEL HALE RBTAIHED BLACK .rBHAXiE. OTHER TOTAL I KAIiS. female HALE FEMALE I total PERCENT Provide the most current information SECONDARY SUBJECT AREA COURSES FAILED WHITE BLACK OTHER SUBJECT AREA Grade Male Female Hale Female Male Female TOTAL Male I Female English 7/10 English 8/11 English 9/12 Hath History/Social Studies______ Science Provide the most current information GRADUATION DATA FOR 1990-91 SCHOOL YEAR (HIGH SCHOOL ONLY) TOTAL NUMBER OF STUDENTS GRADUATING: BM BF WM WF OM OF TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL Duplicate as needed. Complete and return to Planning, Research, and Evaluation office.CLASS/COURSE ENROLLMENT (Secondary Only) Please insert or have available master schedule or current print-out entitled "Summary Master/Teacher Schedule Report - Race and Sex." Do not send to Planning, Research, and Evaluation office.ATTENDANCE DATA Please insert or have available current attendance data for: Staff - Certified - Support Student Provide most current student data, including withdrawals by gender, race, and grade level. Ai A dii}..
:< v'*' 1 I LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL PROFILE 1991-92 SCHOOL: Vc anUicn GRADES: -4 I ' L 1 <-1 __~ ...Lr__ J PRINCIPAL: LcL:dL2 Race/Gender E KA ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL(S): TalOl'-ftlO _______ Race/Gender WSCHOOL f V GRADE li L 'J _E ROOM ,^4 K (5-^ d- 1 r\ 7 7^ 7^ 1___ Z)^ TOTAL CLASS ENROLLMENT (Elementary Schools Only) 1991-92 I TEACHER'S GENDER/RACE F F F WHITE PRINCIPAL CLASS ENROLLMENT BLACK OTHER MALE 4 FEMALE 2. MALE -5- LtI ic) 15- dllL 3^ OL <- 11. JL II 11 1 I p E 3 tA F 6 v/ '^d 27 0 J. o L ! o 2 2. (y'- d. I Q. 0 0 I a I 3 o a _E 3 I I 12 IQ /1 LL IQ 13 /o FEMALE s __ 1 '7 MALE 6? 0 FEMALE I / i I TOTAL c9O ^-O I O /6 c^ Io 1 9 a (L 1 a a <3 -3^ o 0 0 u a 0 0 a c> 2 0 c
0 a o O o CL- 0 20 t I 2- 13 2(2 =?s S.9 o Do not include teachers of pull-out classes (art, music, physical education, etc.). List each class separately. The official date for enrollment data is October 1, 1991. Duplicate if needed.SCHOOL ENROLLMENT GRADE LEVEL 3 A 5 aelf-CQnh TOTAL WHITE MALE IL 3 L A I A 10 BLACK OTHER FEMALE '3 3_ MALE in 3(e FEMALE MALE I 0 FEMALE 3 a C) 0 Cl TOTAL Iq.O.. 2 SPECIAL ED. ~ Self Contained -J A4 .0^ 3 \1 2 0 o S .01 loo ENROLLMENT SPECIAL SERVICES ' MALE WHITE BLACK OTHER FEMALE CD MALE 7 3 FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTAL (O a Resource Room 0 0 T Speech/Vision or Hearing Impaired, etc. Indirect Services *GIFTED/TALENTED REMEDIAL/ COMPENSATORY o 0 TOTAL PERCENT * Include ONLY those students who have been identified as Gifted by the G/T office and are receiving G/T instruction. The official date for enrollment data is October 1, 1991. Do not compute the percentages. AJ SUPPORT PERSONNEL WHITE BLACK OTHER TOTAL POSITION Attendance Clerk Cafeteria Workers Custodians Instructional Aides MALE FEMALE MALE C'- 2 FEMALE MALE a. o FEMALE cj- G I I o 4 O I I \ D 0 Media Clerk ) Nurse I I o I.
Registrar Secretary I c Security Officerfs) o Social Workerfs) (' ) Supervision Aides O O o n C. ) Other TOTAL 0 o I 1 The official date for staffing information is October 1, 1991. and Evaluation office.CERTIPIED PERSONNEL WHITE POSITION Adminlstratorlsl MALE FEMALE I__ BLACK MALE \ FEMALE o T H E..R TOTAL MALS T Classroom Teachers Counselor(b} I I Librarianfs) Reading (Compensatory/ Remedial)___ I Mathematics (Compensatory/ Remedial)___ Gifted (Elementary only) I raBA-St. - CCi I 7 Speech Therapist- other M u SI c I Q I I U A / I Tf Ouf v^cr TOTAL to 40 J 1 O D Advanced Placement/Honors/Gifted/Enriched (Secondary Only) Of the secondary classroom teachers listed above, indicate the number teaching AP, Honors, Gifted, and/or Enriched classes. ACADEMIC AREA (English, History, etc) WHITE MALE FEMALE BLACK OTHER TOTAL MALE. FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTAL The official date for staffing information is October 1, 1991. Complete and return to Planning, Research, and Evaluation office.u' ^Slt-.' -<<!* A**-, -<' .. :-K*
^r'*' // 'f> /h i i 7r> SCHOOL PROFILE 1991-92 SCHOOL: anUicn GRADES: I ' v_ - Lg__ PRINCIPAL: 'C O-r^ i ><ii ? Race/Gender ^jA ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL(S): 'aVii-fViQ _______ Race/GenderTABLE OP CONTENTS 1. 2 . 3 . 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Personnel: - Certified Staff - Support Staff - Staff Changes (After October 1) Enrollment
- School - Special Services - Class/Course Attendance Data: - Certified Staff - Support Staff - Students Extended Educational Programs Honors/Awards (Schoolwide) Committees/Parental Involvement Extracurricular Activities (Including Student Monitors) Student Achievement/Assessment Data Retention Data Secondary Subject Area Courses Failed Graduation Data (High School Only) Staff Development Activities - Certified Staff - Support Staff Quarterly Discipline Management Report Map of School PlantSTAPP CHANGES (After October 1) Added/Delated Certified Staff Positions During Current School Year POSITION Added Deleted BLACK WHITE OTHER Total M F M F M F TOTAL Added/Deleted Support Staff Positions During current School Year BLACK WHITE OTHER M F POSITION Added Deleted Total M F M F TOTAL Duplicate if needed.CLASS ENROLLMENT (Elementary Schools Only) 1991-92 I Fr v-j SCHOOL PRINCIPAL CLASS ENROLLMENT GRADE ROOM TEACHER'S GENDER/RACE WHITE BLACK OTHER (g - 3 F F MALE FEMALE J___ iL- FEMALE MALE O FEMALE TOTAL \ o li TOTAL z. 30 9 J 1? n I I I O Do not include teachers of pull-out classes (art, music, physical education, etc.). List each class separately. The official date for enrollment data is October 1, 1991. Duplicate if needed.Ip i V<^
V f c^ - ' I l.\/" r^ c * / r _^y)y nJh 1 3^ i 1/ ....9------- _________________________________ i _. .. .._____________________________________________=___ / t \r V 1 5 i V^' 'i f' / I /i^ T?: '.V ~-i. yili -7 :i2U,-i:Z. /i i i____ i I M. J ? T l4 yf -f ? - t /r-^'a .... 1i i A V ^-fr f ------------------------------ fl i- < -f- z / # f u. fi ..fj / I I { 1 I I . ,1 p.. ! I leA.r~:-e4A44:^L, _____ / ff '^.-sr i-'t AL1 -t^VTAt4l4fA. Cfn^ i Afj f-r- Ji^^tiXic f , ________________ '^^6^-f. J c it -/. 't! AJ. Vf j d ) P /} yrieh / f^la 4 A u ia A i f - , L / ^..0^ >* i / JI t L <' .t^-' / I- /lA'i-ViKl^ J t /y. a t / J /i-- t-^-LC^A^d- ^^/ *- t' f 4 / /h f A1 i '- I -/ i ii' V' /.?xc I ___i > J jL_.-:^Sr J t i tf- A r 11. J -..<'llVfe3^. f. iA:< {. '-^i. ! li j
,r 'i' ff y^ - i - -i J f 4 t-t: J I ! i-, ^i^ClLCL -d Ai^^v^Q.^nc/Hi7t il r e. t-cc-iL <- I . - ------------^^2/. t 'i I K I I' r ..9._ .tyilI LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ARKANSAS MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS 1990-91 INDIVIDUAL SCHOOL SUMMARY GRADE 3 SCHOOL
franklin elementary READING 1988 1989 1990 1991 1988 MATHEMATICS 1989 1990 1991 ALL STUDENTS No. Tested No. Passed 58 47 66 55 55 47 38 35 58 49 66 60 55 42 38 33 Percent Passed BLACK MALES No. Passed Percent Passed BLACK FEMALES No. Passed Percent Passed WHITE MALES No. Passed Percent Passed WHITE FEMALES No. Passed Percent Passed AL 11 AS. 15 AS. 14 93 100 83 23 74 16 94 80 10 91 85 18 82 18 90 50 100 92 19 86 100 100 100 84 13 68 16 94 14 93 86 91 76 87 25 81 17 100 100 11 100 16 73 16 80 25 100 18 82 100 50 100 8 8 4 2 2 5 1 1 7 7 2 6 7 2 OTHER MALES No. Passed 0 0 Percent Passed OTHER FEMALES No. Passed *4 -'-4 Percent Passed 100 100 100 100 100 100 0 2 * 2 0 * 2 2 * Total of all students in the "Other - ---- race category. These scores were not reported by gender.SCHOOL: FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY READING _1988_. 1989 1990 I 1991 1988 AI STAAQ.A'S No. Tested No. Passed 47 4 1 64 59 50 43 47 44 47 44 r er c e nX _Pp.s s e d_ .....8 7__ ____A2. 86 94 AA Pe r. AJi'lUA No. Passed 10 18 15 17 13 It Passed .5 L.ACK FEM.ALET- No. Passed rercent. PasseA__ lUITlLJliLKS i
o. Passed Percent Passed '.HITE FEMALES No. passed 63 18 100 8 100 1. Percent Passed 100 OTHER HALES No. Passed Percent Passed OTHER FEKALES No. Passed * 3 Percen t Pa s.s^ 100 of 82 25 96 5 100 1 100 * 4 100 75 17 94 4 80 4 100 * 3 lAA students in the 89 18 100 5 83 1 100 * 3 100 "Other 81 18 100 8 100 2 100 * 3 100 not reported Ly gender. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ARKANSAS MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS 1990-91 INDIVIDUAL SCHOOL SUMMARY GRADE 6 MATHEMATICS 1989 1990 1991 1988 LANGUAGE ARTS 1989 1990 1991 1988 SCIENCE 1989 1990 1991 1988 SOCIAL STUDIES 1989 1990 1991 64 62 Ai 20 91 26 100 5 100 7 100 * 4 AAA race category. 50 39 78 13 65 15 83 5 100 4 100 * 2 Ai 47 39 83 14 74 16 89 5 83 1 100 * 3 100 47 38 AA 11 69 15 83 1 88 2 100 * 3 ADA. 64 57 Ai 19 86 24 92 3 60 7 lAA * 4 AAA 50 30 60 10 50 9 50 4 80 4 lAA. * 3 ADA. 47 32 68 10 53 14 78 5 83 0 0 * 3 100 47 27 51 6 38 10 56 7 88 1 50 * 3 100 64 44 Ai 14 64 17 65 4 80 5 71 * 4 100 50 22 9 45 2 11 4 80 4 100 * 3 100 47 23 A2. 8 42 8 44 5 83 0 * 2 67 47 27 iZ. 6 38 10 56 7 88 1 50 * 3 100 64 49 U- 14 64 20 77 5 100 6 86 * 4 100 50 31 .62. 11 55 9 50 4 80 4 * 3 100 47 26 55. 8 41 10 5 AA 0 * 3 100 I i li J II 4 .LWisx 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: GRADE: FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 1 WHITE FEMALE TOTAL READING 1 991 TOTAL MATHEMATICS MAT-6 Distribution TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE J6481 M6BYSC SOCIAL STUDIES 10/07/91 PAGE 328 COMPLETE BATTERY Percentile Summary N N Z N Z N Z N Z N Z N 50 26 01_ 75 49 25 1____5PZ 1 0 Q 50Z OZ OZ _ .2__J _QQZ___ 0 0 0 OZ OZ OZ ___2_,_1Q0Z 0 0 0 OZ OZ OZ 2 _1OOZ _ 0 Q 0 OZ OZ OZ 0 2 0 0 OZ 1 OOZ OZ OZ 2 0 0 0 1 OOZ OZ OZ OZ 2 0 C 0 1 OOZ OZ OZ OZ 1 I Number Tested ____Mean N<t_H_NC. WHITE MALE Percentile Summary 76 50 26 ?? 75 49 _ oLj^ es. Number Tested Mean Nat_* 1 NCE _ ALL WHITE Percentile Summary ____7^ 50 26 2 j:o.9_ TOTAL READING N Z 2 82.2_______ 2 ___69.3...... TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE N X N X 2 72.6_. BASIC BATTERY N X 2 50.0 2 82.0 2 76.8 SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY . 1 i N X N N X i 0 1 0 OZ 50Z OZ 1- ...soz 2 45,8 TOTAL READING N Z 2 0 0 ipoz OZ OZ 0 1 1 OZ 50Z 50Z 1 0 1 0_ BOZ OZ BOZ OZ _ 1 0 1 0 BOZ OZ BOZ OZ 1 0 1 0 BOZ OZ BOZ OZ 1 0 1 0 50Z OZ 50Z OZ , i I I 2 91 8 2 53,0 2 58.7 2 53.5 2 66.9 2 61.1 TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY I ' 17 I N Z N Z N Z N Z N N I 1-------- ,1 i ^9. 75 49 01 j^es __L 2 0 . 1. 25X_________4___UQZ BOZ OZ ^Z____ 0 0 - J OZ OZ 2 .._.50X - - 1 1 --Q._ 25Z 25Z OZ - 3___75Z____ 0 1 OZ 25Z 1 _ . 25Z ____0____ ox 2 1 0 BOZ 25Z OZ 3 0 1 0 75% OZ 25Z OZ 3 0 1 0 7SZ OZ 25Z OZ I I Is ) Number Tested Mean Nat.Ll_tlE 4 S8^3- 4 4 ___ 4 65.7___ 4 51.8_____ 4 74.4 4 _ 68.9 7CI 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 991 MAT-6 Di fitrIbut ion J6481 M6BYSC 10/07/91 PAGE 329 I I *! SCHOOL: GRADE: FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 1 BLACK FEMALE TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY ' '0 Percintiie SuoBary 76 5 0 26 01 99 75 43 25 Nuaber Tested Mean Nat * I NCE BLACK MALE Percentile Sunmary 76 50 26 01 99 75 49 25 Number Tested Mean Nat * 1 NCE ALL BLACK Percentile Summary 76 50 26 01 99 75 49 25 Number Tested Mean Nat * 1 NCE N X N X N X N X N N X N Li 5 5 7 6 S2X 22X 30X 6 6 7 3 27X 27X 32X 14X 7 7 5 4 30X 30X 22X 17X 4 6 B 4 1 8X evx lex 1 5 3 14 4X 22X 1 3X 61 X 2 4 6 1 1 9X 17X 26X 48X 5 4 7 6 23X 18X 32X 27X | I 23 47.6 22 52.3 23 51 .8 22 49.3 23 33.4 23 38.5 22 46.4 1 I TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY i N X N X N X N X N X N N X 5 3 1 0 23 12X 7X 24X 56X 11 6 9 16 26X 14X 21X 38X 7 5 14 17 1SX 12X 33X 40X 6 3 14 17 15X 8X 35X 43X 3 1 0 9 21 7X 23X 21 X 49X 5 7 9 22 12X 16X 21X 51 X 7 3 12 1 8 18X 8X 30X 45X 41 37.6 42 47.6 43 41.8 40 39.4 43 38.6 43 39.4 40 37.2 TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY N 1 0 8 17 29 64 41 . 1 X 16X 13X 27X 45X N X N X N X N X N X N X 17 12 1 6 19 27X 19X 25X 30X 12 1 3 21 21X 18X 29X 32X 1 0 9 22 21 16X 1 5X 35X 34X 4 15 1 2 35 6X 23X 18X 53X 7 1 1 15 33 1 IX 17X 23X 50X 12 7 1 3 24 19X 1 1 X 31 X 39X -I 64 49.2 66 45.3 62 42.9 66 36.8 66 39.1 62 40.4 I I .i 1 ...T 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: GRADE: FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 1 OTHER MALE TOTAL READING 1 991 TOTAL MATHEMATICS MAT-6 Distribution TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE M6BYSC SOCIAL STUDIES 10/07/91 PAGE 330 COMPLETE BATTERY Percent lie Sunsary N N X N X N X N X N X N X 50 26 AA 75 49 A oi_r..25 1 0 ,0 ___ttX. 1 OOX OX _ox A 1 0 0 __ox 1 OOX ox ox A 1 0 0 __OX 1 OOX OX OX 0 i 0 0 OX 1 OOX OX OX 0 i 0 0 OX 1 OOX OX OX 0 0 1 0 ox ox 1 OOX ox 0 1 0 0 OX 1 OOX OX OX " I ! Number Tested Mean Nat.:i_NtE. ALL OTHER Percentile Summary 7 6 50 26 99 75 49 01. -^25____ Number Tested Mean Nat LL.-NCE 1 1 61^7 57x0 1 ___54,8 . 1 1 1 58.7, 50.0 48.9 1 59.3 r TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY N 0 1 0 1 61 .7 X N X N X N X N X N X N X ox i box ox 0 1 0 0 1 57.0 OX 100X ox ox 0 1 0 OX 1 box OX __0__,__QX 0 1 0 0 ox 1 OOX ox ox 0 1 0 0 OX 1 OOX OX OX 0 0 1 0 OX ox 1 OOX ox 0 1 0 0 ox 1 OOX OX OX ...J 1 1 1 54.8 58.7 50.0 1 1 48.9 59.3 hl i' - H |.V.| i I I vs <4IO tt2 13 IB .WJi'Sl. 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: GRADE: FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 1 ALL STUDENTS TOTAL READING 1 991 TOTAL MATHEMATICS MAT-6 Distribution TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE J6481 M6BYSC SOCIAL STUDIES 10/07/91 PAGE 331 COMPLETE BATTERY Percentile SuBaary 76 - 50 26 75 49 01-25 Number Tested Ht<n_W4t<LJCE. N X N X N X N X N X N X N Ji 1 1 17 JO 14K 16X 25X 43X 21 13 16 19 1 9X 23X 28X lA 14 20 21 _g3X____ 20X 28X 30X _L1 1 0 23 SI ____ 15X 34X _31X____ 5____7X 18 13 35 25X 18X 49X 1 0 1 1 17 33 14X 15X 24X 46X 15 8 20 24 22 X 12X 30X 36X 69 42.3 63 St.5 71 67 -44.4, 71 .37.S_... 71 41.2 .. 67 42,3 10 I I . I : I I = 'l I I vi1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 991 MAT-6 Distribution J6481 M6BYSC 10/07/91 PAGE 332 I SCHOOL: GRADE: FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 WHITE FEMALE TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY Percentile Summary N X N X N X N X N X N X N 76 so 26 01 99 75 49 25 1 1' 0 1 33X 33X OX 33X 0 1 2 0 OX 33X 67X OX 0 2 0 1 OX 67X OX 33X 0 2 0 1 OX 67X fiY. 33Y. 0 1 2 0 OX 33X 67X OX 0 1 2 0 OX 33X 67X OX 0 2 0 1 OX 67X OX 33X Number Tested Mean Nat'1 NCE 3 50.2 3 48.3 3 42.1 3 47.5 3 50.9 3 49.1 3 48.7 Si i ' WHITE MALE TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL ~ LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY Percentile Summary N X N X N X N X N X N X N X I. . 76 50 26 01 99 75 49 25 0 0 1 0 OX OX 1 OOX OX 1 0 0 0 100X_ "OX OX OX 0 i 0 0 OX 1 OOX OX ox 0 1 0 0 OX 1 OOX OX OX 0 1 0 0 OX 1 OOX OX OX 0 0 1 0 OX OX lOOX OX 0 1 0 0 OX 1 OOX OX OX Number Tested Mean Nat'l NCE 1 1 ALL WHITE Percentile SuBmary 76 SO 26 01 99 75 49 25 Number Tested Mean Nat'l NCE 42.5 79.6 1 1 50.0 54.2 1 1 58.1 46.8 1 55.3 TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY N X N X N X N X N N X N 1 1 1 1 25X 25X 25X 25X 1 1 2 0 25X 25X SOX OX 0 3 0 1 OX 75X OX 25X 0 3 0 1 OX 75X OX 25X 0 2 2 0 OX SOX SOX OX 0 1 3 0 OX 25X 75X OX 0 3 0 1 OX 75X OX 25X 4 48.3 4 56.1 4 44.1 4 49.2 4 52.7 4 48.5 4 50.4 1 U4 /Q 2 14 t1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 991 MAT-6 Distribution #J6481 M6BYSC 10/07/91 PAGE 333 I SCHOOL
GRADE: FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 i'i ! BLACK FEMALE TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY Percentile Sumsary N X N X N X N X N X N X N I .1 76 r, 50 26 - 01 - 75 49 25. .1_____4X_ 1 15 6 4X 65X 26X _4___17X_ 5 11 3 22X 48X 13X 0 8 1 1 4 OX 35X 48X 17X 1 6 1 1 5 4X AZ'A 22X 0 1 6 1 6 OX 4X my. 2 1 5 15 37. AX 22X 65X 1 4 1 1 7 4X 17X 48X 30X 'f I Nunber Tested Mean Nat_*l_NCE BLACK MALE Percentile Sunnary 76 50 26 99 75 49 01 Nunber Tested Mean NatNCE ALL BLACK Percentile Sunnary 76 .^99, 50 26 01 75 49 25_____ Nunber Tested ___Mean NatZlMCE 23 .38..7. TOTAL READING N X 23 ___5,1 .vO_____ 23 .....43.7 23 42.1 23 31.8 23 36.6 23 40.2 TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY N X N X N X N X N N X -I _ _ 0__ 6 4 .__J_7 . 27 33. S _ OX 22X 15X 63X 7 5 1 26X 1 9X zex ._8___3fiX ____2 8 3 7X 30X 1 1 X 3 4 5 ____15 1 IX 1EX 1 9X 56X 0 4 2 21 37. 15X 7X 78X 1 4 9 13 4X 15X 33X 48X a 6 6 IS OX 22X 22X 56X TOTAL READING N X 1____2X_ _ 7 1 9 23 14X 38X 46X 27 46.2 27 38.9 27 37.0 29.4 27 35.5 27 34.7 TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY N X N N X N X N X N --It___22X______ 10 18 1 1 SOX 36X 22X 2 1 6 14 18 4X 32X 28X 36X 4 1 0 16 SO 8X _ SOX 3SX 40X 0 5 8 37 OX I OX 16X 74X 3 5 1 4 28 6X 1 OX 28X 56X 1 1 0 1 7 22 2X 20X 34X 44X 50 .35._9_ 50 ___48.4 ____ 50 ___41 . 1 50 ______39.7 50 -30.5 50 36.0 50 37.2 i.'J1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 991 MAT-6 Distribution J6481 M6BYSC 10/07/91 PAGE 334 J SCHOOL: GRADE: FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2 ALL STUDENTS TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY Percent 11 Sunnary N X N X N X N X N X N N X 0 .n __ 50 26 75 49 8 20 -4X 15X 37X te__zzy, . _ 01 25___ g4___44X 1 1 20 1 1 20X 37X SOX ___e_____4y. 19 14 19 35X 26X 3SX 4 1 3 1 6 21 7X e4X 30X 39X 0 1 1 0 37 OX 13X 19X 69X 3 6 17 28 6X 1 IX 31X 52X 1 13 1 7 23 2X 24X 31 X 43X Nuaber Tested 54 .. Mean NatZJL NCE____ 54 _49.0 54 ____4J.. 3. 54 40,4 54 ____32.1 54 36.9 54 38.2 .'I 'I 1'
rj I st 1. _______10 'I r at I 40 I 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: GRADE: FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3 UHITE FEMALE TOTAL READING 1 991 TOTAL MATHEMATICS riAT6 Distribution TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE ttJ6481 M6BYSC SOCIAL STUDIES 10/07/91 PAGE 335 COMPLETE BATTERY Percentile Sumaary 76 50 26 01 99 75 49 25 Nunber Tested Mean Nat * 1 NCE UHITE MALE Percent lie Sumaary 76 99 50 75 26 01 49 25 Nuaber Tested Mean Nat * 1 NCE ALL WHITE Percentile Sunaary 76 50 26 01 99 75 49 25 Number Tested Mean Nat'I NCE N X N X N 'X N X N N X i.'-i 1 1 0 0 50X 50X OX OX 2 0 0 0 1 OOX ox ox ox 2 0 0 0 ipox ox ox ox 2 0 0 0 1 OOX ox ox ox 1 BOX 1 BOX 0 0 OX ox 0 S 0 0 OX 1 OOX OX ox 2 0 0 0 1 OOX OX OX OX 2 62. 1 2 79.5 2 86.9 2 76.0 2 67.2 2 54.0 2 72.0 TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC" " BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY P-l N 3 1 0 1 5 63.1 X N X N X N X N X N X N X 60X 2 OX OX 20X 4 0 0 1 80% OX OX 20X __3 0 1 1 60X ox 20X 20X 4 0 0 1 80X OX OX 20X 3 1 1 0 60X 20X 20X OX 3 1 1 0 6 OX 20X 20X OX 4 0 0 1 SOX ox ox 20X 5 67.0 5 63.8 5 65.8 5 66.6 5 67.7 5 66.4 t: ( l-i TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY - - -It N 4 2 0 1 7 62.8 X N X N X N X N X N X N X 57X e9X ox 1 4X 6 0 0 1 86X OX ox 1 4X 5 0 1 1 71 X OX 14X 14X 6 0 0 1 8&X OX OX 14X 4 2 1 0 57X 29X 14X OX 3 3 1 0 43X 43X 1 4X OX 6 0 0 1 86X OX OX 1 4X 7 70.5 7 70.4 7 68.7 7 66.8 7 63.8 7 68.0 n I Hi ':'i 1 I- iI -I "I 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: GRADE: FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3 BLACK FEMALE TOTAL READING 1 991 TOTAL MATHEMATICS MAT-6 Distribution TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE J6481 M6BYSC SOCIAL STUDIES 1 0/07/91 PACE 336 COMPLETE BATTERY Percentile Suaaary N Z N Z N Z N Z N Z N Z N 50 26 QI 12. 75 49 25 1 2 5 .11 1 iz 22Z 56Z 1 6 1 1 111 ^17, 1 IZ 1 IZ 1 3 3 2 33Z 33Z 22Z 0 2 6 1 OZ 22Z 1 1Z 1 b 5 3 11% OZ 56Z 33Z 1 0 3 5 1 1Z OZ 33Z 3(>7, 1 0 6 2 1 1Z OZ 67Z 22Z Number Tested Mean NatJ_l_NCJ BLACK MALE Percentile Summary 76 50 26 99 75 49 ____0t,_r__25. Number Tested ___Mean Nat * 1 NCE d----- I ALL BLACK Percent i1 Summary 76 - 93 50 26 75 49 Number Tested .^ean_Nat<r_NC. 3 9 .48., 8 3 A8 5 _ 9 44.3 3 39,5 9 38.3 9 42.8 TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY N Z N Z N Z N Z N Z N N J 1 5Z 3 1 0 14Z 45Z 2 8 7 9Z 36Z 32Z 3K & 6 6 A 27Z 27Z 27Z 3 5 7 14Z 83Z 32Z 7___,32Z_ 3 7 $ (, 14Z 32Z 27Z 27Z 2 6 8 6 9Z 27Z 36Z 27Z 2 7 6 7 9Z 32Z e7Z 32Z !d 22 39.1 22 47.8 22 53.9 22 44.7 22 45.2 22 44.3 22 44.2 I TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY N Z N Z N Z N Z N Z N Z N ._L____6Z. 4 12 1 3 13Z 39Z 42Z 3____1J!X 14 8 6 45Z 26Z 19Z 7 9 9 6 29Z 29Z 19Z 3 7 13 8 J OZ 23Z 42Z 26Z 4 7 1 1 3 . 13Z E3Z 35Z 29Z 3 _ 1 OX 6 1 1 1 1 1 9Z 35Z 35Z 3 7 12 9 1 OZ 23Z 39 Z 29Z 9 f 31 19.9. 31 46.1 31 .52x1____ 31 ___44.7 31 -43.6 31 42.5 31 43.8 I., 11 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 991 I ' I MAT-6 Distribution J6481 M6BYSC 10/07/91 PAGE 337 I I I SCHOOL: GRADE: FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3 OTHER FEMALE TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE Percentile Sunaary SOCIAL STUDIES N X N X N X N X N X N COMPt.ETE BATTERY 50 26 01 75 49 25 1 1 QX- N Nuaber Tested 0 0 0. ox ox ox 1 X 1 Mean Nat * l^NCE_______75.8 ALL OTHER TOTAL READING Percentile Sunmary N X ...r 76 50 26 99 _ 75 49 _ 1 6 Q 1 OOX OX OX OX 0 0 ox ox I__100X ___0_____ox, . 0 0 0 OX OX px ...1 0 0 0 lOOX ox ox ox 0 1 0 0 OX 1 OOX OX OX 1 0 0 0 1 OOX ox ox OX 1 0 0 0 t OOX ox ox ox 1 7J.Q____ 1 ___86*9. TOTAL MATHEMATICS total LANGUAGE N X N X 1 . -79.6 BASIC BATTERY N X 1 64.2 1 70.1 1 77.0 L._J-QQX 0 0 . 0- OX ox -OX. 1 6 0 100X OX OX _____10_____ox , 1 0 0 _____0 to OX OX ox OX SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY N N X N Number Tested Mean Nat'I NCE 1 75.8 1 71 .8 1 __86.9 1 79.6 I I 0 1 0 0 1 64.2 OX t OOX ox ox 1 0 0 0 1 70 . 1 1 OOX ox OX OX 1 0 0 0 1 77.0 1 OOX c ox Q'/.1 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1991 MAT-6 Distribution I J6481 M6BYSC 10/07/91 PAGE 338 SCHOOL: GRADE: FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3 ALL STUDENTS TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY Percentile Summary N X N X N X N X N X N N X 76 50 26 01 JI 75 49 25 7 i 12 1 4 18X 15X 31X 36X 1 0 1 8 7 26X 36X 21X 18X 13 9 1 0 7 33X 23X 26X 18X 1 0 7 13 9 26X 18X 33X 23X 8 1 0 12 9 21X 26X 31 X 23X 1 9 12 1 1 18X 23X 31X 28X 1 0 1 12 1 0 26X 1 8X 31 X 26?. Number Tested Mean NaVl NCE 39 44.9 39 52.7 39 56.4 39 49.9 39 48.3 39 47.1 39 49.0 I )1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 991 MAT-6 DI Ctrl but Ion J6481 M6BYSC 10/07/91 PAGE 339 I i SCHOOL: GRADE: FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4 UHITE FEMALE TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY rl Percentile Sumaary N X N X N X N X N X N N 'A 50 26 75 49 017.25___ _1_ 1 4 .0 .1_TX 17X 67X OX .2. 3 1 0 33X BOX 17X OX 2___33X 2 2 0 33X 33X OX 2 1 3 0 33X 1 7X SOX OX 1 3 2 0 17X BOX 33X OX 1 0 4 1 17X OX 67X 1 7X 1 3 2 0 17X BOX 33X OX Number Tested ______Mean NaVl_NCE. 6 53.0- 6 _____65..5___ 6 -58.9 6 59,5 6 55.7 6 52.1 6 58.3 I' ' UHITE MALE TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY . ! Percentile Summary N X N X N N X N X N X N 4' 76 50 26 99 75 49 . Ok.-.25_____ 0 1 0 OX 25X OX __3_.._75X__ q 1 2 1 OX, 2BX 5Q% 25X 0 1 1 OX 25X 25X __2___BOX 0 1 0 3 OX 25X OX 75X 1 0 0 3 2BX OX OX 75X 0 1 0 3 OX 25X OX 75X 0 1 0 3 OX 25X OX 75X 4 Number Tested Mean Nat'l NCE 4 33.9 4 38.3 4 37.4 4 35.0 4 32.6 4 31 . 1 4 33.6 ALL UHITE TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY Percentile Suaaary N X N X N X N X N X N X N X 50 26 75 49 .1___10X _oi_^_e5. 2 4 3 20X 40X 30X -2. 4 3 1 .2QX____ 40X 3 OX JLPX 2 3 3 20X 30X 3^7, _2__. SOX 2 2 3 3 20X 2 OX 30X 30X 2 3 2 3 20X 30X 20X 30X 1 1 4 4 1 OX 1 0 4 OX 4 OX 1 4 2 3 1 OX 40X 20X 30X u Number Tested ______Ilean_bat2-1_NCE_ 1 0 1 0 ____54.6 1 0 ...50 ,-3 . 1 0 49,7 1 0 - -46.4 . 1 0 43.7 1 0 48.4I I IS ..r I I r I little rock school district 1 991 SCHOOL : SRADE: franklin elementary black female Percent 11 SuBBary SCHOOL total reading total mathematics N X N X mat-6 Distribution total language BASIC battery SCIENCE #16481 M6BYSC Q/Q7/3I PACE 340 -------------- 5Q - Z6 - .SI 75 49 25 1 4 5 22Z 28X -8___44 K A 5 4 7 N X N X N X social studies complete battery N Nuaber Tested Mean NatM_jjCE 22Z 6 39Z________ 3 BLACK MALE Percent 11 e Sunaary 1 8 -^^3_______ TOTAL reading N X 18 ____76 50 26 .99__ 75 49 01-.^25. e S. 5 IS, I IX 1 1X 26X 53X Nuaber Tested Nat/l NCE J 9 - ALL black TOTAL reading Percent tie N X 6--_3S. 50 S6 IS 49 -X-------8X. -----PI T 25______ 6 1 0 1 6X ETZ -49X, Number Tested Mean._Mai_Ll NCE^ 37 -39^5_. 39X 33X -TX_ 1 8 ___50.8.. total mathematics total language N 1 5 5 5X 26X 26X -5__-42X__ 1 3 ____38.8 total mathematics N X N X - . 1 IX 6 4 32X 21X - -T_.37X 1 3 total language N X ------3____17X 2 7 6 1 IX 39X 33X 2 1 e 3 1 1Z 6X 33X SOX 2 4 3 9 X N
This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.