Presentation given at the third annual Governor's Conference on Leadership, Arlington Hotel, Hot Springs, Arkansas, May 19-20, 1991
1 DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE IN THE STATE OF ARKANSAS 1980-1990 Dr. Lawrence Santi Division of Demographic Research University of Arkansas at Little Rock Little Rock, AR 72204 501-569-8571 < I Prepared for presentation at the Third Annual Governor's Conference on Leadership The Arlington Hotel Hot Springs, Arkansas May 19-20, 1991 I I DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE IN THE STATE OF ARKANSAS, 1980-1990 Dr. Lawrence Santi Division of Demographic Research University of Arkansas at Little Rock Little Rock, AR 501-569-8571 Prepared for presentation at the Third Annual Governor's Conference on Leadership The Arlington Hotel Hot Springs, Arkansas May 19-20, 1991I PREFACE from the first major The data presented in this document come _ release of detailed data from the 1990 Census of the Population, of 1990 Census data for reapportionment contained a minimal (An earlier release mandated by Public Law 94-171, purposes, as _ number of population characteristics.) Generally speaking, data from the decennial censuses (and the _ .. I _ J____\ af-tzA VOloaCi printed reports based on these data) are organized and released in terms of "Summary Tape Files" (or STFs). STF data are released first in machine-readable format, with the official printed reports following in a year or so. As with the 1980 Census, data from the 1990 Census are organized into four major STFs. STFs 1 and 2 contain "complete count" data items that were gathered from all Census respondents. consist mainly of basic demographic characteristics such as sex, household relationship, marital and family These data items age, race, status, and so on. STFs 3 and 4 contain "sample data items that were gathered only These for those Census respondents who received the "long form" Census questionnaire, approximately one-sixth of all households. T-cce data items include more "socioeconomic" characteristics such as education, income, labor force status, and the like. Unfortunately, STF3 data are still about a year away. 1991. This document is based on Summary Tape File 1, which was received by the Arkansas State Data Center on May 1, Out of the literally hundreds of data items available on STFl, I extracted a subset that I hoped would be of fairly general interest. Those who want a more comprehensive overview of 1990 Census data products should contact the State Data Center, located on the UALR campus, at 569-8530. iiI a a a a THEMATIC LISTING OF TABLES AND MAPS Population Change and Its components for the State as a Whole Table 1: Analysis of Population Change 1980 to 1990............. in the State of Arkansas, Table 2: Components of Population Change for the State of Arkansas, 1940 to 1990....................... Population Change and Its Components for Arkansas Counties Table 3: Components of Population Change for Arkansas Counties, 1980 to 1990........................................ Map 1: Map 2: Population Change among Arkansas Counties, Natural Increase among Arkansas Counties, 1980-1990 1980-1990 Map 3: Net Migration among Arkansas Counties, 1980-1990 1 1 2 4 5 6 General Population characteristics for Arkansas Counties 7 a a Table 4
Map 5: Age Structure of Arkansas Counties, 1980-1990........... Percentage of the Population Under 18 Years of Age, 1990... Percentage of the Population 65 Years of Age or Older, 1990.............................................. .9 10 Table 5: Gender Composition of Arkansas Counties, 1980-1990 11 Map 6: Sex Ratio of Arkansas Counties, 1990 13 Map 4: Table 6: Racial Composition of the State of Arkansas, 1980-1990... 14 fl Table 7: The Black Population of Arkansas Counties, 1980-1990 15 Map 7: The Black Population of Arkansas Counties, 1990 17 fl Household and Fzmily Structure within Arkansas Counties Table 8: Basic Data on 1980-1990. Living Arrangements for Arkansas Counties, 18 Map 8: Percentage of the Population in Group Quarters, 1990 20 111 I 1 I <iI thematic listing OF TABLES AND MAPS (CONTINUED) Map 9: Average Household Size, 1990 21 Table 9: Households by Type of Household for Arkansas Counties, 1980-1990........................................... 22 Map 10: Percentage 1990.. of Households Headed by Married Couples, 24 Map 11: Percentage 1990. . of Households That Are Female-Headed Families, 25 Table 10: Living Arrangements of Persons Under 18 Years of Age, 1980-1990........................................ 26 I I Map 12: Percentage of Children Living with Both Parents, 1990 28 Map 13: Percentage of Children Living with One Parent, 1990 29 Table 11: Marital Status of Females 15 Years of Age and Older, 1980-1990....................................... 30 I a I Map 14: Percentage of Women Currently Married, 1990 32 Map 15: Percentage of Women Never Married, 1990 33 Map 16: Percentage of Women Divorced or Separated, 1990 34 Map 17: Percentage of Women Widowed, 1990 35 The Shape of Things to Come? Change in Economic Well-Being among Arkansas Counties a a a a a Table 12: Per Capita Money Income for Arkansas Counties, (from 1980 Census) and 1987 (Estimates) 1979 36 Map 18: Estimated Change in Per Capita Money Income, 1979-1987....38 iv aTABLE 1: ANALYSIS OF POPULATION CHANGE IN THE STATE OF ARKANSAS, 1980 TO 1990 1980 Population 1990 Population Growth, 1980-1990 Percentage Growth, 1980-1990 2,286,357 2,350,725 64,368 2.8 Births, 1980-1989 Deaths, 1980-1989 Natural Increase, 1980-1989 Percentage Natural Increase, Estimate of 1990 Population, based on natural increase 1980-1989 353,000 236,000 117,000 5.1 2,403,357 a Implied Net Migration, 1980-1990 Implied Percentage Migration, 1980-1990 TABLE 2: -52,632 -2.3 COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE a FOR THE STATE OF ARKANSAS, 1940 TO 1990 COMPONENTS OF INTERCENSAL CHANGE a CENSUS POPULATION 1940 1949387 1950 1909511 a 1960 1786272 1970 1923295 a 1980 2286357 1990 2350725 INTERCENSAL CHANGE % NATURAL CHNG. INCREASE -39876 -123239 137023 363062 64368 -2.0 -6.5 7.7 18.9 2.8 375000 307698 188095 131764 117000 % NATL. NET INC. MIGRATION 19.2 16.1 10.5 6.9 5.1 -414876 -430937 -51072 231376 -52632 % NET MIG. -21.3 -22.6 -2.9 12.0 -2.3 a a 1 aTABLE 3: COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE FOR ARKANSAS COUNTIES, 1980 TO 1990 COUNTY 1980 1990 CHANGE X CHNG. BIRTHS NATURAL DEATHS INCREASE X NATL. INC. NET MIGRATION X NET MIG. I I fl fl fl fl fl H fl Arkansas Ashley Baxter Benton Boone Bradley Calhoun Carrol I Chicot Clark Clay Cleburne Cleveland Colimbia Conway Craighead Crawford Crittenden Cross Dallas Desha Drew Faulkner Franklin Fulton Garland Grant Greene Hempstead Hot Spring Howard Independence Izard Jackson Jefferson Johnson Lafayette Lawrence Lee Lincoln Little River Logan Lonoke Madison Marion Hiller Mississippi Monroe Montgomery Nevada Newton Ouachita Perry Phillips Pike Poinsett Polk Pope Prairie Pulaski Randolph 24175 26538 27409 78115 26067 13803 6079 16203 17793 23326 20616 16909 7868 26644 19505 63239 36892 49499 20434 10515 19760 17910 46192 14705 9975 70531 13008 30744 23635 26819 13459 30147 10768 21646 90718 17423 10213 18447 15539 13369 13952 20144 34518 11373 11334 37766 59517 14052 7771 11097 7756 30541 7266 34772 10373 27032 17007 38964 10140 340597 16834 21653 24319 31186 97499 28297 11793 5826 18654 15713 21437 18107 19411 7781 25691 19151 68956 42493 49939 19225 9614 16798 17369 60006 14897 10037 73397 13948 31804 21621 26115 13569 31192 11364 18944 85487 18221 9643 17457 13053 13690 13966 20557 39268 11618 12001 38467 57525 11333 7841 10101 7666 30574 7969 28838 10086 24664 17347 45883 9518 349660 16558 -2522 -2219 3777 19384 2230 -2010 -253 2451 -2080 -1889 -2509 2502 -87 -953 -354 5717 5601 440 -1209 -901 -2962 -541 13814 192 62 2866 940 1060 -2014 -704 110 1045 596 -2702 -5231 798 -570 -990 -2486 321 14 413 4750 245 667 701 -1992 -2719 70 -996 -90 33 703 -5934 -287 -2368 340 6919 -622 9063 -276 -10.4 -8.4 13.8 24.8 8.6 -14.6 -4.2 15.1 -11.7 -8.1 -12.2 14.8 -1.1 -3.6 -1.8 9.0 15.2 0.9 -5.9 -8.6 -15.0 -3.0 29.9 1.3 0.6 4.1 7.2 3.4 -8.5 -2.6 0.8 3.5 5.5 -12.5 -5.8 4.6 -5.6 -5.4 -16.0 2.4 0.1 2.1 13.8 2.2 5.9 1.9 -3.3 -19.3 0.9 -9.0 -1.2 0.1 9.7 -17.1 -2.8 -8.8 2.0 17.8 -6.1 2.7 -1.6 3356 3791 2903 11865 3710 1719 715 2188 3059 2884 2240 1874 949 3916 2790 9160 6004 9595 3399 1522 3418 2624 7481 2036 1112 9158 1738 4053 3293 3494 2203 4330 1108 2629 14825 2438 1429 2499 2755 1795 1914 2860 5334 1698 1330 6159 12031 2209 863 1400 1082 5113 1055 6802 1366 3867 2365 6340 1290 61454 2107 2773 2617 4415 8497 2925 1793 706 1969 2034 2326 2638 2172 839 3065 2079 5630 3560 4629 2044 1389 2033 1636 3977 1635 1250 9553 1319 3185 2633 2860 1692 3094 1500 2416 8813 2136 1328 2229 1776 1205 1325 2408 3240 1291 1367 3962 5759 1749 990 1387 692 3771 865 4040 1182 2877 2092 3463 1079 29015 1842 583 1174 -1512 3368 785 -74 9 219 1025 558 -398 -298 110 851 711 3530 2444 4966 1355 133 1385 988 3504 401 -138 -395 419 868 660 634 511 1236 -392 213 6012 302 101 270 979 590 589 452 2094 407 -37 2197 6272 460 -127 13 390 1342 190 2762 184 990 273 2877 211 32439 265 2.4 4.4 -5.5 4.3 3.0 -0.5 0.1 1.4 5.8 2.4 -1.9 -1.8 1.4 3.2 3.6 5.6 6.6 10.0 6.6 1.3 7.0 5.5 7.6 2.7 -1.4 -0.6 3.2 2.8 2.8 2.4 3.8 4.1 -3.6 1.0 6.6 1.7 1.0 1.5 6.3 4.4 4.2 2.2 6.1 3.6 -0.3 5.8 10.5 3.3 -1.6 0.1 5.0 4.4 2.6 7.9 1.8 3.7 1.6 7.4 2.1 9.5 1.6 -3105 -3393 5289 16016 1445 -1936 -262 2232 -3105 -2447 -2111 2800 -197 -1804 -1065 2187 3157 -4526 -2564 -1034 -4347 -1529 10310 -209 200 3261 521 192 -2674 -1338 -401 -191 988 -2915 -11243 496 -671 -1260 -3465 -269 -575 -39 2656 -162 704 -1496 -8264 -3179 197 -1009 -480 -1309 513 -8696 -471 -3358 67 4042 -833 -23376 -541 -12.8 -12.8 19,3 20.5 5.5 -14.0 -4.3 13.8 -17.5 -10.5 -10.2 16.6 -2.5 -6.8 -5.5 3.5 8.6 -9.1 -12.5 -9.8 -22.0 -8.5 22.3 -1.4 2.0 4.6 4.0 0.6 -11.3 -5.0 -3.0 -0.6 9.2 -13.5 -12.4 2.8 -6.6 -6.8 -22.3 -2.0 -4.1 -0.2 7.7 -1.4 6.2 -4.0 -13.9 -22.6 2.5 -9.1 -6.2 -4.3 7.1 -25.0 -4.5 -12.4 0.4 10.4 -8.2 -6.9 -3.2 1 fl COUNTY 1980 TABLE 3: 1990 COMPONENTS OF CHANGE FOR COUNTIES (CONTINUED) CHANGE % CHNG. BIRTHS NATURAL DEATHS INCREASE X NATL. INC. NET MIGRATION X NET MIG. II Saint Francis Saline Scott Searcy Sebastian Sevier Sharp Stone Union Van Buren Washington White Woodruff Yell 30858 53156 9685 8847 95172 14060 14607 9022 48573 13357 100494 50835 11222 17026 28497 64183 .10205 7841 99590 13637 14109 9775 46719 14008 113409 54676 9520 17759 -2361 11027 520 -1006 4418 -423 -498 753 -1854 651 12915 3841 -1702 733 -7.7 20.7 5.4 -11.4 4.6 -3.0 -3.4 8.3 -3.8 4.9 12.9 7.6 -15.2 4.3 5802 7567 1239 980 15256 1842 1507 1128 7640 1393 16252 7452 1636 2324 3223 3997 1162 994 9124 1644 1951 1032 5740 1539 8332 5122 1430 2001 2579 3570 77 -14 6132 198 -444 96 1900 -146 7920 2330 206 323 8.4 6.7 0.8 -0.2 6.4 1.4 -3.0 1.1 3.9 -1.1 7.9 4.6 1.8 1.9 -4940 7457 443 -992 -1714 -621 -54 657 -3754 797 4995 1511 -1908 410 -16.0 14.0 4.6 -11.2 -1.8 -4.4 -0.4 7.3 -7.7 6.0 5.0 3.0 -17.0 2.4 I State Totals 2286357 2350725 64368 2.8 352714 236057 116657 5.1 -52289 -2.3 III aa aaa 3 a MAP 1: POPULATION CHANGE AMONG ARKANSAS COUNTIES, 1980 1990 madisn'I RANK wiw 0iHe /NEWON SEARCri' tocAfij WONTC POLK-fes VANjB
CONW GAR.LNC WLtpN INO pliASKT PIKE HOT SPRG SEMEI CLARK CALLAS' L'.RIVER-: ew^MP -dlXER luAF? NEV OU AC
COLUMB \ RAND j -76REENE^ lawr c a -76REENE, INDEp UACK MU S^OOD ThAIR MON ra ARKANSAS gm CALK UNION CL?^ BRAD LIW DREW -/ASHLET, Percentage Change Loss of 10.0% or more POINSETT CROSS. icRlT-ST FRAN LEE IHILLIPS, DESHA, :hiC( Lo of 5.0% to 9.9% Loss of less than 5.0X Gain of 5.0% to 9.9% Gain of less than 5.0% Gain of 10,0% or more Division of Demogrophlc Research University of Arkonsos at Little Rock I MAP 2: NATURAL INCREASE AMONG ARKANSAS COUNTIES, 1980 1990 ui *sra POLK RANK : fW.t
: pike: MARI01 BAX FULTON7^0 SHHAARRPP- /.X? . : LAWR. VAN a CLEB POPE .Wt MONTC > A''V
I* GARLND H<_IW
SPRG|<{^NT CLARK. DALI Ci\^ ClAY
pdl N'SETT.'
. M It .'f-L Across !! 'ST'^W 5> > :f WO \:-nHiLLi^ Percentage Increase DecreQ3 of 5.0% or more Dfloroaa^ of looo than 5.0% Increase of less than 5.0% Increase of 5.0% to 9.9% Increase of 10.0% or more t>i oLOcH CALH. 'BRAD icij .flLLERj
-. Jto '.LOMa 'Xshlet 6' Division of Demogrophlc Research University of Arkonsae at Little Rock ( z < 'uNk5f}<>^^ INO^R VGREENfey ark
ws^4^^ MAP 3: NET MIGRATION AMONG ARKANSAS COUNTIES, 1980-1990 Percentage Migration fOlton T'if <Ti MADISH CRAW' A RANK SEB MM- SlZAROi 10.0% or more out NEMOH sEARcrr JOHN: LOGAN CO nW. s jtELC ^fp'
T
ERff?- POLK-IHOW SEMEI L RIVER UQNTG GAR.LHD PIKE HEMP 4ILLEH LAF
ihdep r JACK POINSOT WIE- lOOD J Ira>RAlR PULASKI silONOil HOT SPRGl iCRiijt CLARK OALLAS' MISS, 5.0% to 9.9% out CROSS ''CRiT? Less than 5.0% out ST FRAN Mb*' OUACI CALK JEFF CLEVE BRAD MONI ARKANSAS UNO DREW LEE IHILLI^ 5.0% to 9.9% tn DESHA, Le33 than 5.0% in 10.0% or more in cdLlJMB UNION ASHLEY 1HICO Division of Demographic Research Univereity of Arkansas at Little Rock TABLE 4: AGE STRUCTURE OF ARKANSAS COUNTIES, 1980-1990 (PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTIONS) 1980 1990 COUNTY < 18 18-64 65+ TOTAL < 18 18-64 65+ TOTAL I I I Arkansas Ashley Baxter Benton Boone Bradley Calhoun Carroll Ch i cot Clark Clay Cletxirne Cleveland Colunbia Conway Craighead Crawford Crittenden Cross Dallas Desha Drew Faulkner Franklin Fulton Garland Grant Greene Hempstead Hot Spring Howard Independence Izard Jackson Jefferson Johnson Lafayette Lawrence Lee Lincoln Little River Logan Lonoke Hadi son Marion Hiller Mississippi Monroe Montgomery Nevada Newton Ouachita Perry Phillips Pike Poinsett Polk Pope Prairie 28.6 32.6 21.8 27.3 27.0 28.3 27.9 24.8 35.2 24.9 27.1 25.8 29.8 28.0 30.7 27.6 31.6 36.2 34.4 29.3 34.5 30.0 27.6 29.1 26.3 24.6 30.0 28.7 29.5 28.9 29.3 28.6 23.0 29.6 31.2 27.7 31.7 27.8 36.7 28.6 32.8 29.7 33.0 28.5 26.6 31.1 33.7 32.7 25.5 29.5 30.4 28.3 30.8 36.4 28.2 31.1 28.5 28.8 29.8 57.2 54.5 50.8 56.7 56.3 53.2 55.3 56.3 49.3 60.7 54.4 56.2 54.1 56.1 54.8 61.5 56.6 54.1 53.1 53.6 51.7 56.6 61.8 54.9 54.2 55.9 57.1 57.1 53.5 56.9 53.1 57.4 52.3 55.6 56.6 55.0 50.6 55.4 48.6 57.9 54.0 53.2 55.4 55.9 54.0 55.5 55.3 51.3 55.7 52.1 56.3 55.6 54.7 49.8 55.3 56.1 53.2 59.4 55.4 14.2 12.8 27.3 16.0 16.7 18.4 16.8 18.9 15.4 14.4 18.5 17.9 16.1 15.9 14.4 10.9 11.9 9.7 12.5 17.1 13.7 13.4 10.6 16.0 19.4 19.5 12.9 14.2 17.0 14.2 17.6 14.0 24.7 14.8 12.2 17.3 17.7 16.8 14.7 13.5 13.2 17.0 11.6 15.6 19.5 13.4 11.0 16.0 18.8 18.4 13.3 16.1 14.5 13.8 16.6 12.8 18.3 11.8 14.8 24175 26538 27409 78115 26067 13803 6079 16203 17793 23326 20616 16909 7868 26644 19505 63239 36892 49499 20434 10515 19760 17910 46192 14705 9975 70531 13008 30744 23635 26819 13459 30147 10768 21646 90718 17423 10213 18447 15539 13369 13952 20144 34518 11373 11334 37766 59517 14052 7771 11097 7756 30541 7266 34772 10373 27032 17007 39021 10140 27.4 28.2 19.5 24.8 24.8 25.8 26.9 24.2 32.4 22.3 23.0 21.7 26.3 26.2 27.2 24.7 29.0 31.9 30.3 26.6 31.7 27.8 25.6 26.3 23.6 21.5 26.8 25.2 27.7 25.9 27.6 26.3 21.5 25.7 28.3 24.7 27.7 24.6 33.6 23.3 28.1 27.0 29.5 26.8 22.0 28.4 31.3 29.5 23.1 27.1 28.0 27.0 25.3 34.2 26.1 26.7 25.7 26.3 25.9 55.8 57.3 51.3 57.3 58.0 55.3 56.6 57.6 51.5 61.0 56.3 57.4 58.8 57.0 56.4 63.2 59.0 57.5 55.8 55.2 53.5 58.7 63.7 57.0 55.3 56.3 60.4 59.3 55.7 57.5 55.1 59.0 52.6 56.6 58.3 57.9 54.6 56.7 50.7 64.7 57.8 56.0 58.9 56.8 55.3 57.6 57.0 52.6 57.0 54.6 57.0 56.5 58.4 50.7 55.6 58.0 55.0 61.3 57.5 16.7 14.6 29.2 17.9 17.2 18.9 16.5 18.2 16.2 16.7 20.7 20.9 14.9 16.8 16.4 12.1 12.0 10.6 13.9 18.3 14.8 13.5 10.7 16.8 21.2 22.1 12.8 15.5 16.7 16.6 17.2 14.7 25.9 17.7 13.5 17.4 17.7 18.7 15.7 12.1 14.1 17.0 11.6 16.4 22.8 14.0 11.7 18.0 19.9 18.3 15.1 16.5 16.2 15.1 18.3 15.3 19.3 12.4 16.6 21653 24319 31186 97499 28297 11793 5826 18654 15713 21437 18107 19411 7781 25691 19151 68956 42493 49939 19225 9614 16798 17369 60006 14897 10037 73397 13948 31804 21621 26115 13569 31192 11364 18944 85487 18221 9643 17457 13053 13690 13966 20557 39268 11618 12001 38467 57525 11333 7841 10101 7666 30574 7969 28838 10086 24664 17347 45883 9518 f 7 COUNTY TABLE 4
< 18 AGE STRUCTURE OF COURTIES (CONT I HUED) 1980 1990 18-64 65+ TOTAL < 18 18-64 65+ TOTAL I I Pulaski Randolph Saint Francis Saline Scott Searcy Sebastian Sevier Sharp Stone Union Van Buren Uashington White Woodruff Yell 29.4 29.7 36.5 31.0 28.3 27.7 28.6 29.7 25.2 28.1 28.6 26.7 25.7 28.3 32.2 27.6 60.9 55.1 51.5 59.9 55.0 55.3 58.8 54.8 52.1 56.5 55.7 55.5 63.6 58.2 51.3 55.6 9.8 15.3 12.0 9.1 16.7 17.0 12.7 15.5 22.7 15.4 15.7 17.8 10.7 13.5 16.4 16.8 340613 16834 30858 53161 9685 8847 95172 14060 14607 9022 48573 13357 100494 50835 11222 17026 26.2 25.7 33.0 27.3 25.5 24.3 26.1 26.1 21.7 24.2 27.4 22.4 24.7 25.1 28.8 25.7 62.3 57.1 53.6 61.6 57.7 55.8 59.9 57.4 51.2 58.3 55.9 53.9 64.0 60.3 53.5 57.9 11.5 17.2 13.4 11.1 16.8 19.8 14.0 16.4 27.2 17.4 16.6 23.7 11.3 14.7 17.7 16.4 349660 16558 28497 64183 10205 7841 99590 13637 14109 9775 46719 14008 113409 54676 9520 17759 I I State Totals 29.4 57.0 13.7 2286435 26.4 58.7 14.9 2350725 I I I I 8 MAP 4: PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE, 1990 7 BENTON ? Carroll BOONE BAX WASH TT MARION 7, CfiAWi .SE8. FULTOH rAnp. CLAY Percentage IZARD SHARI \LAWR <^.EENE
Less than 22.49% 4NES/rON RAW ,>JOHN pbiK:- /
':liWVL seMEI i
' SEARCY '.fWE-STONE <-Jf)OEP VAN B MONTG OARLND CLEB JACK PIKE-CLARK pRA'f^ CRAICHEAD PDINSETt
22.50% to 24.99% 25,00% to 27.49% :GFtANt SALINE-. 3) LING CLEVE /ARKANSAS. 27.50% to 29.99% 30.00% or more i**. ' 4 HEMF?.- ^2- O NEV : DALLAS OUACH' 4LLErJ j-T l-Ar,CT .
S COLUMS CACH brad Division of Demogrophlc Research Univeraity of Arkansas ot Little Rock MAP 5: PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION 65 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER, 1990 o i^S, BENTON WASH CRAW SEB RW-i< boone
Percentage EL /WlW lii'i'iajiLCjhi' RANp. it?: si. :STON& '.p.W ,4. INOEP JOHN-g^ fflECNE: CRAIGHEAD I MISS, POPE POINSETT Less th on 12.50% :\L 12.50% to 14.99% Lco^ SCOTT :YEtL TTGifi ifePOLK SSiKiiK . A seMi L RIVER V'hemp
JILLER CCNW
7 . ': JFAULK PERRYp PULASKI SALINE .HOT^SPRG grant . I 'x glark: yt 5i:i WHITE LONO lAlR I sr FRAN iW CROSS CRIT 15,00% to 17.49% LEE Fpv 1 17.50% to 19.99% 0 x 'HILLIPS jefe CLEVE OUACH' cXchT^W BRAD ARKANSAS, r**v A. .... 'y'. 20.00% or more UNG desHaJ DREW aCOLUMB : 'UNIONw 1 ASHLE?r aiipo
Division of Demographic Research Univereity of Arkansas at Little Rock TABLE 5: GENDER COMPOSITION OF ARKANSAS COUNTIES, 1980-1990 1980 1990 FEMALES PER 100 MALES COUNTY MALES FEMALES MALES FEMALES 1980 1990 I II I I III i Arkansas Ashley Baxter Benton Boone Bradley Calhoun Carroll Chicot Clark Clay Cleburne Cleveland Columbia Conway Craighead Crawford Crittenden Cross Dallas Desha Drew Faulkner Franklin Fulton Garland Grant Greene Hempstead Hot Spring Howard Independence Izard Jackson Jefferson Johnson Lafayette Lawrence Lee Lincoln Little River Logan Lonoke Madison Marion 11709 12813 13162 38019 12470 6523 2943 7813 8342 11224 9885 8307 3842 12657 9428 30498 18159 23597 9905 5044 9330 8700 22340 7324 4856 33656 6415 14865 11288 13002 6426 14641 5244 10422 43951 8526 4872 8857 7314 7299 6738 9958 16826 5662 5516 12466 13725 14247 40096 13597 7280 3136 8390 9451 12102 10731 8602 4026 13987 10077 32741 18733 25902 10529 5471 10430 9210 23852 7381 5119 36875 6593 15879 12347 13817 7033 15506 5524 11224 46767 8897 5341 9590 8225 6070 7214 10186 17692 5711 5818 10230 11674 14846 47531 13540 5604 2816 9015 7222 10163 8652 9406 3783 12043 9179 33169 20775 23566 9222 4602 7837 8350 29016 7392 4802 34943 6860 15380 10272 12620 6513 15171 5460 9044 41107 8876 4600 8375 6155 8055 6775 10128 19297 5700 5843 11423 12645 16340 49968 14757 6189 3010 9639 8491 11274 9455 10005 3998 13648 9972 35787 21718 26373 10003 5012 8961 9019 30990 7505 5235 38454 7088 16424 11349 13495 7056 16021 5904 9900 44380 9345 5043 9082 6898 5635 7191 10429 19971 5918 6158 106.5 107.1 108.2 105.5 109.0 111.6 106.6 107.4 113.3 107.8 108.6 103.6 104.8 110.5 106.9 107.4 103.2 109.8 106.3 108.5 111.8 105.9 106.8 100.8 105.4 109.6 102.8 106.8 109.4 106.3 109.4 105.9 105.3 107.7 106.4 104.4 109.6 108.3 112.5 83.2 107.1 102.3 105.1 100.9 105.5 111.7 108.3 110.1 105.1 109.0 110.4 106.9 106.9 117.6 110.9 109.3 106.4 105.7 113.3 108.6 107.9 104.5 111.9 108.5 108.9 114.3 108.0 106.8 101.5 109.0 110.0 103.3 106.8 110.5 106.9 108.3 105.6 108.1 109.5 108.0 105.3 109.6 108.4 112.1 70.0 106.1 103.0 103.5 103.8 105.4 > 1 i 11 TABLE 5: GENDER COMPOSITION OF COUNTIES (CONTINUED) 1980 1990 FEMALES PER 100 MALES I COUNTY MALES FEMALES MALES FEMALES 1980 1990 I i I I I Miller Mississippi Monroe Montgomery Nevada Newton Ouachita Perry Phillips Pike Poinsett Polk Pope Prairie Pulaski Randolph Saint Francis Saline Scott Searcy Sebastian Sevier Sharp Stone Union Van Buren Washington White Woodruff Yell 18030 28704 6699 3854 5352 3891 14386 3587 16186 5037 13059 8286 19177 5016 162475 8162 14610 26475 4803 4337 45557 6833 7134 4443 22927 6585 50322 24727 5382 8284 19736 30813 7353 3917 5745 3865 16155 3679 18586 5336 13973 8721 19844 5124 178138 8672 16248 26686 4882 4510 49615 7227 7473 4579 25646 6772 50172 26108 5840 8742 18372 27793 5317 3868 4826 3843 14419 3919 13188 4915 11872 8446 22665 4670 166481 8000 13233 31718 5013 3829 48144 6737 6708 4778 22101 6899 56060 26539 4473 8641 20095 29732 6016 3973 5275 3823 16155 4050 15650 5171 12792 8901 23218 4848 183179 8558 15264 32465 5192 4012 51446 6900 7401 4997 24618 7109 57349 28137 5047 9118 109.5 107.3 109.8 101.6 107.3 99.3 112.3 102.6 114.8 105.9 107.0 105.2 103.5 102.2 109.6 106.2 111.2 100.8 101.6 104.0 108.9 105.8 104.8 103.1 111.9 102.8 99.7 105.6 108.5 105.5 109.4 107.0 113.1 102.7 109.3 99.5 112.0 103.3 118.7 105.2 107.7 105.4 102.4 103.8 110.0 107.0 115.3 102.4 103.6 104.8 106.9 102.4 110.3 104.6 111.4 103.0 102.3 106.0 112.8 105.5 State Totals 1104688 1181747 1133076 1217649 107.0 107.5 12 ) ite w .BOfTON 1 MAP 6: SEX RATIO or ARKANSAS COUNTIES, 5 [filniia. / MADISH-J NE?ArrON CRAW HARIONS! SEARC? tfR^ .^( SEB , eX OHN.I jii LOGAN" Sl 4,' > gcbiTzy ^1. POPE YELL' ^eOLK-^ VAN B wedhW 7j.il PERRY .HOW ___tr I'^Ei
piKE,q ( 8 [AIR 1990 Females per 100 Males Less than 100.0 : 100.0 to 104.9 *105.0 to 109.9 110.0 or more SAIJNE fj rj -HOT SPRG ({i FWI.V LOl^O 5*:: 0 li. u> sWW-sSer? V'' ili'- vMjlU-ER Li'fjii** Division of Demographic Research Univereity of Arkansas at Little Rock TABLE 6: RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS, 1980-1990 A: ABSOLUTE NUMBERS WHITE BLACK INDIAN ASIAN OTHER TOTAL I 1980 1990 1890322 1944744 373768 373912 9428 12773 6740 12530 6177 6766 2286435 2350725 i B: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTIONS WHITE BLACK INDIAN ASIAN OTHER TOTAL 1980 1990 82.7 82.7 16.3 15.9 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.3 100.0 100.0 5 c: PERCENTAGE CHANGE, 1980-1990 WHITE BLACK INDIAN ASIAN OTHER TOTAL 1 1980-1990 2.9 0.0 35.5 85.9 9.5 2.8 I ( i H 1 t < i fl a a 14 a TABLE 7
THE BLACK POPULATION OF ARKANSAS COUNTIES, 1980-1990 1980 1990 COUNTY BLACK TOTAL %BLACK BLACK TOTAL %BLACK I I I II Arkansas Ashley Baxter Benton Boone Bradley Calhoun Carroll Chicot Clark Clay Cleburne Cleveland Columbia Conway Craighead Crawford Crittenden Cross Dallas Desha Drew Faulkner Franklin Fulton Garland Grant Greene Hempstead Hot Spring Howard Independence Izard Jackson Jefferson Johnson Lafayette Lawrence Lee Lincoln Little River Logan Lonoke Madison Marion Miller 4805 7237 26 50 2 4022 1706 4 9414 5079 3 4 1194 9242 2974 2876 460 21207 5068 3957 8444 4886 3700 154 1 5756 420 5 7062 3014 2486 551 3 2887 36825 273 4189 84 8520 4794 3470 307 4218 0 2 9136 24175 26538 27409 78115 26067 13803 6079 16203 17793 23326 20616 16909 7868 26644 19505 63239 36892 49499 20434 10515 19760 17910 46192 14705 9975 70531 13008 30744 23635 26819 13459 30147 10768 21646 90718 17423 10213 18447 15539 13369 13952 20144 34518 11373 11334 37766 19.9 27.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 29.1 28.1 0.0 52.9 21.8 0.0 0.0 15.2 34.7 15.2 4.5 1.2 42.8 24.8 37.6 42.7 27.3 8.0 1.0 0.0 8.2 3.2 0.0 29.9 11.2 18.5 1.8 0.0 13.3 40.6 1.6 41.0 0.5 54.8 35.9 24.9 1.5 12.2 0.0 0.0 24.2 4738 6616 4 124 5 3648 1447 6 8859 4913 6 6 1059 8992 2876 3778 374 21401 4782 3698 7139 4754 4778 99 10 5604 377 20 6464 2865 2919 595 11 2759 36877 309 3711 88 7487 4935 2931 273 3536 3 6 8625 21653 24319 31186 97499 28297 11793 5826 18654 15713 21437 18107 19411 7781 25691 19151 68956 42493 49939 19225 9614 16798 17369 60006 14897 10037 73397 13948 31804 21621 26115 13569 31192 11364 18944 85487 18221 9643 17457 13053 13690 13966 20557 39268 11618 12001 38467 21.9 27.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 30.9 24.8 0.0 56.4 22.9 0.0 0.0 13.6 35.0 15.0 5.5 0.9 42.9 24.9 38.5 42.5 27.4 8.0 0.7 0.1 7.6 2.7 0.1 29.9 11.0 21.5 1.9 0.1 14.6 43.1 1.7 38.5 0.5 57.4 36.0 21.0 1.3 9.0 0.0 0.0 22.4 15 TABLE 7: BLACK POPULATION OF COUNTIES (CONTINUED) 1980 1990 COUNTY BLACK TOTAL %BLACK BLACK TOTAL %BLACK II II Mississippi Monroe Montgomery Nevada Newton Ouachita Perry Phillips Pike Poinsett Polk Pope Prairie Pulaski Randolph Saint Francis Saline Scott Searcy Sebastian Sevier Sharp Stone Union Van Buren Washington White Woodruff Yell 16164 5738 11 3398 5 11002 133 18410 414 1868 2 836 1417 81407 155 14190 1458 2 0 4916 783 100 7 13970 51 1475 1497 3490 352 59517 14052 7771 11097 7756 30541 7266 34772 10373 27032 17007 39021 10140 340613 16834 30858 53161 9685 8847 95172 14060 14607 9022 48573 13357 100494 50835 11222 17026 27.2 40.8 0.1 30.6 0.1 36.0 1.8 52.9 4.0 6.9 0.0 2.1 14.0 23.9 0.9 46.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 5.2 5.6 0.7 0.1 28.8 0.4 1.5 2.9 31.1 2.1 16006 4422 8 3196 0 10739 119 15753 378 1773 0 1129 1294 92200 146 13521 1348 1 2 5666 787 66 8 14061 41 1676 1703 2991 371 57525 11333 7841 10101 7666 30574 7969 28838 10086 24664 17347 45883 9518 349660 16558 28497 64183 10205 7841 99590 13637 14109 9775 46719 14008 113409 54676 9520 17759 27.8 39.0 0.1 31.6 0.0 35.1 1.5 54.6 3.7 7.2 0.0 2.5 13.6 26.4 0.9 47.4 2.1 0.0 0.0 5.7 5.8 0.5 0.1 30.1 0.3 1.5 3.1 31.4 2.1 state Totals 373768 2286435 16.3 373912 2350725 15.9 I I 16 I MAP 7: THE BLACK POPULATION OF ARKANSAS COUNTIES, 1990 (Source
Division of Demogrophic Research, UALR) Percentage Black BEMTON WASH / CRAW SEB iRROLL BOONE MARIilOM, BBAX FULTON .IZARD SHARP Less than 1.0% MAOISM NEWTON SEARCr STONE RANK "JOHN LOGAN XVELL SCOTT POLK HOW MONTG SEVERi. L RIV^ POPE I VAN B CLEB C0NW7 JFAULK PERRT-GARLND SALII HOT SPRG PIKE 7 V CLARK. HEMP .ilLLER INDEP WACK ..'POINSETT WHITE ,0 i'^UtASKt LONO GRANT !AIR PMISS, 1.0% to 0.9% .DALLAS' CLEVE NEV OUACl CALH BRAD fcOLUMO UNION. CROSS
tSili < fCRIT4( iSTsFRAN MON)^ 20.0% to 29.9% p'dl esiw 10.0% to 19.9% 30.0% to 39.9% OhEW''LW 40.0% to 49.9% A^L^-.' 50.0% or more TABLE 8: BASIC DATA ON LIVING ARRANGEMENTS FOR ARKANSAS COUNTIES, 1980-1990 1980 1990 COUNTY POP HHPOP X IN GQ HH HHSIZE POP HHPOP X IN GQ HH HHSIZE i I I I i I H H fl fl fl fl Arkansas Ashley Baxter Benton Boone Bradley Calhoun Carroll Chicot Clark Clay Cleburne Cleveland Colunbia Conway Craighead Crawford Crittenden Cross Dallas Desha Drew Faulkner Franklin Fulton Garland Grant Greene Hempstead Hot Spring Howard Independence Izard Jackson Jefferson Johnson Lafayette Lawrence Lee Lincoln Little River Logan Lonoke Madison Marion Miller Mississippi Monroe Montgomery Nevada Newton Ouachita Perry Phillips Pike Poinsett Polk Pope Prairie Pulaski 24175 26538 27409 78115 26067 13803 6079 16203 17793 23326 20616 16909 7868 26644 19505 63239 36892 49499 20434 10515 19760 17910 46192 14705 9975 70531 13008 30744 23635 26819 13459 30147 10768 21646 90718 17423 10213 18447 15539 13369 13952 20144 34518 11373 11334 37766 59517 14052 7771 11097 7756 30541 7266 34772 10373 27032 17007 39021 10140 340613 23902 26268 27151 76736 25681 13582 5846 16140 17712 21031 20395 16803 7802 25674 19236 60342 36456 49227 20171 10329 19567 17221 42767 14170 9846 68980 12903 30431 23442 26588 13164 29692 10603 21401 87908 17011 10109 18085 15389 11619 13822 19391 33980 11307 11262 37387 58337 13946 7710 10918 7725 30194 7232 34472 10241 26880 16838 37582 10140 333646 1.1 1.0 0.9 1.8 1.5 1.6 3.8 0.4 0.5 9.8 1.1 0.6 0.8 3.6 1.4 4.6 1.2 0.5 1.3 1.8 1.0 3.8 7.4 3.6 1.3 2.2 0.8 1.0 0.8 0.9 2.2 1.5 1.5 1.1 3.1 2.4 1.0 2.0 1.0 13.1 0.9 3.7 1.6 0.6 0.6 1.0 2.0 0.8 0.8 1.6 0.4 1.1 0.5 0.9 1.3 0.6 1.0 3.7 0.0 2.0 8909 9061 11181 28622 9781 5040 2121 6431 5993 8134 7911 6405 2769 9535 6800 22334 12566 15701 6631 3735 6640 6200 15489 5164 3765 28171 4504 11228 8578 9683 4818 10901 4284 7786 30588 6395 3587 6797 4942 3918 4735 7059 11408 4094 4311 13476 19757 4920 2922 3980 2718 11198 2564 11434 3839 9465 6318 13615 3658 124516 2.68 2.90 2.43 2.68 2.63 2.69 2.76 2.51 2.96 2.59 2.58 2.62 2.82 2.69 2.83 2.70 2.90 3.14 3.04 2.77 2.95 2.78 2.76 2.74 2.62 2.45 2.86 2.71 2.73 2.75 2.73 2.72 2.48 2.75 2.87 2.66 2.82 2.66 3.11 2.97 2.92 2.75 2.98 2.76 2.61 2.77 2.95 2.83 2.64 2.74 2.84 2.70 2.82 3.01 2.67 2.84 2.67 2.76 2.77 2.68 21653 24319 31186 97499 . 28297 11793 5826 18654 15713 21437 18107 19411 7781 25691 19151 68956 42493 49939 19225 9614 16798 17369 60006 14897 10037 73397 13948 31804 21621 26115 13569 31192 11364 18944 85487 18221 9643 17457 13053 13690 13966 20557 39268 11618 12001 38467 57525 11333 7841 10101 7666 30574 7969 28838 10086 24664 17347 45883 9518 349660 21285 24020 30756 95908 27868 11529 5737 18490 15607 19145 17894 19108 7710 24738 18778 66393 41950 49438 18946 9407 16584 16677 56505 14417 9902 71593 13838 31347 21216 25760 13165 30559 11111 18686 81111 17668 9534 17045 12903 10481 13812 19865 38771 11546 11904 37727 56382 11204 7542 9884 7618 30140 7882 28470 9913 24401 17160 43989 9429 342290 1.7 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.5 2.2 1.5 0.9 0.7 10.7 1.2 1.6 0.9 3.7 1.9 3.7 1.3 1.0 1.5 2.2 1.3 4.0 5.8 3.2 1.3 2.5 0.8 1.4 1.9 1.4 3.0 2.0 2.2 1.4 5.1 3.0 1.1 2.4 1.1 23.4 1.1 3.4 1.3 0.6 0.8 1.9 2.0 1.1 3.8 2.1 0.6 1.4 1.1 1.3 1.7 1.1 1.1 4.1 0.9 2.1 8389 8890 13486 37555 11131 4545 2185 7550 5557 7907 7504 7926 2868 9638 7179 26285 15251 17120 6754 3600 5957 6342 21325 5578 4010 30836 5118 12325 8212 10115 4975 11846 4684 7361 30001 7059 3584 6857 4578 3796 5150 7628 13866 4392 4970 14273 20420 4361 3062 3798 2818 11712 3055 10183 3855 9368 6827 16828 3661 137209 2.54 2.70 2.28 2.55 2.50 2.54 2.63 2.45 2.81 2.42 2.38 2.41 2.69 2.57 2.62 2.53 2.75 2.89 2.81 2.61 2.78 2.63 2.65 2.58 2.47 2.32 2.70 2.54 2.58 2.55 2.65 2.58 2.37 2.54 2.70 2.50 2.66 2.49 2.82 2.76 2.68 2.60 2.80 2.63 2.40 2.64 2.76 2.57 2.46 2.60 2.70 2.57 2.58 2.80 2.57 2.60 2.51 2.61 2.58 2.49 18 flI TABLE 8: BASIC DATA ON LIVING ARRANGEMENTS (CONTINUED) 1980 1990 I COUNTY POP HHPOP % IN GO HH HHSIZE POP HHPOP % IN GO HH HHSIZE I Randolph Saint Francis Saline Scott Searcy Sebastian Sevier Sharp Stone Union Van Buren Washington White Woodruff Yell 16834 30858 53161 9685 8847 95172 14060 14607 9022 48573 13357 100494 50835 11222 17026 16743 30653 51511 9611 8782 93700 13910 14540 8968 47964 13317 94815 48104 11141 16772 0.5 0.7 3.1 0.8 0.7 1.5 1.1 0.5 0.6 1.3 0.3 5.7 5.4 0.7 1.5 6079 9930 17572 3534 3257 35803 5057 5642 3280 18080 5018 36072 17423 4014 6219 2.75 3.09 2.93 2.72 2.70 2.62 2.75 2.58 2.73 2.65 2.65 2.63 2.76 2.78 2.70 16558 28497 64183 10205 7841 99590 13637 14109 9775 46719 14008 113409 54676 9520 17759 16349 28153 62921 10074 7764 97979 13400 13883 9662 45874 13873 109124 51606 9392 17601 1.3 1.2 2.0 1.3 1.0 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.2 1.8 1.0 3.8 5.6 1.3 0.9 6445 9958 23037 3957 3117 39298 5118 5819 3866 17819 5698 43372 19823 3630 6907 2.54 2.83 2.73 2.55 2.49 2.49 2.62 2.39 2.50 2.57 2.43 2.52 2.60 2.59 2.55 a State Totals 2286435 2234921 2.3 816065 2.74 2350725 2292393 2.5 891179 2.57 a a a a a a a a a 19 a1- to o MAP 8: PERCENTAGE OF "J BENTON I. . WASH.' CARROLL MADISN CRAW SEB BOONE T MARION NEWTON rank JOHN- T-* LOGAN , YELL SCOTT POLK MONTG' PIKE SEMEfA-, L RIVER HEMP MILLER LAR POPULATION IN GROUP QUARTERS, 1990 T FULTON RAND V \ ----------7GREENE / Jy, IZARD I lawr-------- /t- Percentage Less than 2.5% I SEARCY VAN B .'POPE-CONW PERRY CLEB PULASKI darlnd^^saune HOT SPRG CRANT NEV Bja DALLAS OUACH CALH LONO WEEFl Im CLEVE BRAD ' JACK 'wood RAIR MONR ARKANSAS DESHA DREW lCOLUMB UNION ASHLEY CHICO
CRAlGH^fi POINSEn CROSS ST FRAN LEE 'HILLIPS MISS, : 2.5% to 4.9% 1 CRIT Division of 5.0% to 9.9% 10.0% or more Demographic Research Univereity of Arkansas at Little Rock BENTON CARROLL 1 WASH fTAOtSN' Wit 4 RANK John SEB MAP 9: average household size, 1990 -9 LO^N yA-i YELL 7 'POPE- \scoTr POLK SEMEI x-RiyeR MONTG V-, PIKE HEMP JEAf-f' PERRY GARLND T FULTON J \ rand j -jX K 1- :M1 CRAICHEAb' VAN B CLEB INDEP JACK I : -POlNS'Eltf. J JFAUUK -..WH.ITE-- lOO PULASKI ^NEI-t ___HOT SPRG ?C^r
CLARK NE^ PRAIR IJON^ ARKANSAS Persons per household Less than 2.50 2.50 to 2.59 2.60 to 2.69 2.70 to 2.79 :DALLAS OUACH J . . . (A.CALH COLUMB Al CLEVE :/BRADt-- UNION fW DRD< S# 2.80 or more Division of Demogrophlc Research University of Arkansas ot Little Rock COUNTY TABLE 9: HARRIED COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE OF HOUSEHOLD FOR ARKANSAS COUNTIES, (PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTIONS) FAMILY 1980-1990 1980 1990 NON FAMILY FAMILY NONFAMILY HALE FEHALE HALE FEHALE HEAD HEAD HEAD HEAD TOTAL HARRIED COUPLE MALE FEMALE HEAD HEAD HALE FEMALE HEAD HEAD TOTAL I I I fl fl fl H fl fl fl fl fl fl Arkansas Ashley Baxter Benton Boone Bradley Calhoun Carroll Chicot Clark Clay Cleburne Cleveland Columbia Conway Craighead Crawford Crittenden Cross Dallas Desha Drew Faulkner Franklin Fulton Garland Grant Greene Hempstead Hot Spring Howard Independence Izard Jackson Jefferson Johnson Lafayette Lawrence Lee Lincoln Little River Logan Lonoke Madison Marion Miller Mississippi Monroe Montgomery Nevada Newton Ouachita Perry Phillips Pike 64.7 66.0 72.9 72.9 69.1 64.0 65.1 67.0 53.1 62.8 67.2 73.9 70.2 60.5 68.1 66.0 73.0 59.7 66.9 63.2 57.8 63.6 67.1 69.9 71.3 60.8 74.3 69.6 63.6 69.7 66.8 70.0 72.2 64.5 60.1 68.7 59.1 68.4 57.4 64.6 67.4 68.6 71.7 74.2 72.7 61.6 62.7 57.6 72.8 64.2 73.9 62.2 71.8 54.3 70.0 2.9 2.4 1.3 1.7 1.7 2.6 2.0 1.9 3.6 2.2 1.9 1.9 2.9 2.5 2.0 2.1 2.0 3.4 2.5 2.4 3.1 2.5 1.8 2.2 1.6 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.4 2.1 1.9 2.1 1.7 2.5 2.8 2.0 3.0 1.9 2.8 2.8 2.5 2.1 2.1 2.2 1.7 2.6 2.9 2.7 2.3 2.8 2.5 1.9 2.0 3.3 1.9 9.0 10.3 5.4 6.0 6.9 9.8 10.4 6.8 17.3 8.4 7.3 5.6 6.2 11.4 9.2 8.7 7.9 15.7 10.2 9.8 13.7 10.6 7.3 7.5 6.3 8.7 6.0 7.7 10.0 7.6 8.7 7.4 4.9 10.0 13.3 7.1 11.0 8.0 16.5 10.9 9.2 7.2 8.0 4.9 6.2 12.2 12.7 13.1 5.7 9.6 5,4 11.1 6.4 17.3 6.2 8.9 7.6 6.5 7.0 7.2 7.1 7.9 8.2 8.7 9.5 7.0 6.9 6.5 8.7 6.9 8.5 6.2 8.8 7.3 8.7 10.2 8.9 9.1 7.4 7.4 11.2 5.9 6.9 8.7 6.8 6.2 7.3 7.0 8.0 9.9 7.7 10.1 6.5 8.5 8.1 7.9 7.2 6.4 6.7 7.5 8.2 8.0 9.7 7.0 8.5 7.4 8.4 7.6 9.5 8.3 14.4 13.8 13.9 12.5 15.1 16.6 14.7 16.1 17.4 17.1 16.5 11.7 14.3 17.0 13.8 14.7 10.9 12.4 13.0 15.9 15.3 14.4 14.5 13.0 13.4 17.4 11.9 13.8 15.3 13.8 16.4 13.2 14.2 14.9 13.9 14.5 16.8 15.1 14.9 13.7 13.0 14.9 11.8 12.0 11.9 15.3 13.7 16.9 12.3 14.8 10.9 16.3 12.3 15.6 13.6 8909 9061 11181 28622 9781 5040 2121 6431 5993 8134 7911 6405 2769 9535 6800 22334 12566 15701 6631 3735 6640 6200 15489 5164 3765 28171 4504 11228 8578 9683 4818 10901 4284 7786 30588 6395 3587 6797 4942 3918 4735 7059 11408 4094 4311 13476 19757 4920 2922 3980 2718 11198 2564 11434 3839 56.9 61.7 65.4 67.9 64.2 57.0 60.9 61.0 45.8 55.7 61.4 67.2 66.7 54.4 60.8 58.7 67.6 53.1 61.2 57.4 52.8 57.4 62.1 65.3 65.8 57.5 69.1 64.7 56.6 62.6 60.6 64.0 65.4 57.8 54.0 61.3 55.1 61.9 49.0 58.2 61.4 63.6 67.2 68.2 65.4 55.7 56.7 50.9 65.3 57.7 68.5 56.4 64.7 46.3 66.9 3.1 3.1 2.0 2.4 2.2 3.1 2.5 2.6 3.7 2.4 2.6 2.1 2.9 3.0 3.0 2.6 2.7 4.0 3.6 3.9 3.4 3.1 2.5 2.9 2.5 2.4 3.1 2.6 3.1 2.9 3.0 2.9 2.1 3.0 3.3 2.9 3.2 2.3 3.5 3.0 3.5 2.7 3.0 2.8 2.6 3.3 3.3 3.0 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.8 3.0 3.1 2.5 12.1 11.9 6.1 6.9 7.9 13.3 10.5 8.4 21.7 11.2 7.7 6.7 9.5 13.8 10.9 10.5 9.9 18.7 12.8 11.6 17.5 13.6 9.3 8.0 7.0 9.5 7.2 8.5 13.4 10.0 11.5 8.2 6.9 12.2 16.0 8.6 13.9 9.3 20.1 14.0 11.5 8.6 9.4 6.2 6.8 14.9 15.3 15.8 6.9 12.3 6.1 13.0 6.9 22.1 6.8 11.1 9.4 9.4 9.1 9.2 9.4 11.2 10.9 10.3 11.7 9.8 9.0 8.4 10.7 10.0 11.6 8.0 10.6 8.0 10.7 10.0 10.4 11.1 9.2 8.8 12.0 8.2 9.3 10.4 9.1 9.0 9.6 9.0 10.2 11.1 10.9 10.8 8.8 11.0 9.8 9.8 9.4 8.4 9.2 10.5 10.1 10.4 10.9 10.3 10.6 9.1 10.6 11.4 10.9 9.1 16.8 13.9 17.1 13.6 16.4 17.3 14.9 17.1 18.5 19.1 18.5 14.9 12.6 18.2 15.4 16.6 11.8 13.6 14.4 16.4 16.4 15.5 15.0 14.6 15.9 18.6 12.4 15.0 16.5 15.4 15.9 15.3 16.6 16.8 15.7 16.3 17.0 17.7 16.4 15.1 13.9 15.6 12.0 13.6 14.8 15.9 14.4 19.4 14.7 16.7 13.4 17.2 13.9 17.7 14.7 8389 8890 13486 37555 11131 4545 2185 7550 5557 7907 7504 7926 2868 9638 7179 26285 15251 17120 6754 3600 5957 6342 21325 5578 4010 30836 5118 12325 8212 10115 4975 11846 4684 7361 30001 7059 3584 6857 4578 3796 5150 7628 13866 4392 4970 14273 20420 4361 3062 3798 2818 11712 3055 10183 3855 fl 22COUNTY HARRIED COUPLE TABLE 9: FAMILY 1980 MALE FEMALE HEAD HEAD households by type for counties (CONTIMUED) NONFAMILY MALE FEMALE HEAD HEAD MARRIED TOTAL . COUPLE 1990 FAMILY MALE FEMALE HEAD HEAD NONFAMILY MALE FEMALE HEAD HEAD TOTAL I Poinsett Polk Pope Prairie Pulaski Randolph Saint Francis Saline Scott Searcy Sebastian Sevi er Sharp Stone Union Van Buren Washington White Woodruff Yell 67.0 68.9 69.1 68.0 57.9 69.7 59.4 74.9 72.2 70.7 62.7 68.6 73.3 72.5 60.9 73.5 63.8 69.9 59.5 70.0 2.6 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.2 3.0 2.0 1.8 2.3 1.8 2.0 1.7 2.3 2.3 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.4 2.0 10.2 7.3 7.9 7.2 12.4 7.2 15.2 7.3 5.5 5.8 9.6 7.8 5.3 6.0 10.9 6.2 6.9 7.1 12.3 6.8 6.9 7.3 8.1 9.2 11.1 7.0 8.7 6.1 7.4 8.3 9.8 7.5 6.8 7.5 8.8 6.9 12.7 6.8 9.7 7.6 13.3 14.4 12.6 13.5 16.2 14.0 13.7 9.7 13.2 12.9 16.1 14.1 12.9 11.6 17.2 11.5 14.6 14.2 16.0 13.6 9465 6318 13615 3658 124516 6079 9930 17572 3534 3257 35803 5057 5642 3280 18080 5018 36072 17423 4014 6219 61.0 64.2 64.1 62.4 51.8 63.8 52.0 69.6 65.4 65.6 57.6 62.9 65.7 66.5 56.4 66.0 58.2 65.2 51.9 63.2 3.0 2.7 2.6 2.8 2.8 2.7 3.4 2.6 3.0 3.7 2.9 3.0 2.2 2.6 2.8 2.4 2.8 2.7 3.3 3.2 11.4 7.5 8.7 8.9 13.5 8.5 19.2 8.1 8.1 5.5 9.8 8.8 6.5 7.0 13.0 6.5 8.1 8.5 16.3 8.4 9.0 10.0 10.6 10.4 13.3 9.0 9.9 8.5 9.3 9.4 12.5 10.5 8.6 9.6 10.4 10.0 14.6 8.8 10.7 9.9 15.6 15.7 14.0 15.5 18.5 16.0 15.6 11.2 14.1 15.7 17.2 14.8 17.0 14.2 17.3 14.9 16.3 14.8 17.8 15.4 9368 6827 16828 3661 137209 6445 9958 23037 3957 3117 39298 5118 5819 3866 17819 5698 43372 19823 3630 6907 I State Totals 64.7 2.2 9.7 8.8 14.6 816065 59.2 2.8 11.1 10.8 16.1 891179 I I I I I I 23 4NJ h MAP 10: PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS HEADED BY MARRIED COUPLES, 1990 ^1 08 Mi n jk&jaj! MTWSfiiin, Percentage Less than 50.0% ViASH Su?*)!? E?l "TOLk'
3 s^o l'rwer^ SitFEB JACK HEMP mller CAF> CflAIGTTEAQ': MISS, ' '< 50.0% to 54-.9% ! 'wood a fe,CROSS^ ST FRAN - CRIT 55.0% to 59.9% GAf^p. ." GLAW< NE? I PUtASKI DALLAS OOAfcH' COLUMB '.'ttNIC^ Ri? wMONR Veff ^^^:AR>W'SAS Llrte OREM aRApf-: oHico
LEE 60.0% to 64.9% 'HILLIPS 65.0% or more DESHA Division of Demographic Research University of Arkansas at Little Rock BENTON K WASH N) (JI CRAW MAP 11: PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS THAT ARE FEMALE-HEADED FAMILIES, 1990 "T CARROLL MADISN RANK boone: NEWTON JOHN SEB LOGAN \ SCOTT POLK 1|-HOW seviEi L'RiyER MARIONV>N A BAX FULTON J \ . RAND j ClAY Percentage IZARD SHARI' \ LAWR GREENE Less than 7.50% SEAfiCT 7 VAN B STONE "3. CLEB ^CRAIGHEAD': toinsettL POPE OONWJ FAULK \ WHITE YELLv MONTG PIKE - 7.50% to 9.99% 10,00% to 12.49% qarLND t-Ti saline PERRY LONO Hair 12.50% to 14.99% <.HbT:sHG grant :CLARK
DALLAS
nev-si ILER CLEVE .. , faak '4 1 1 J arv iosi .:ARi<A
js^s. ashlex if Ff* 15.00% OF more Division of Demographic Research Univerelty of Arkansas at Little Rock TABLE 10: LIVING ARRANGEMENTS OF PERSONS UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE, 1980-1990 (PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTIONS) 1980 1990 COUNTY BOTH PARENTS SINGLE PARENT OTHER TOTAL BOTH PARENTS SINGLE PARENT OTHER TOTAL I I I I I fl fl Arkansas Ashley Baxter Benton Boone Bradley Calhoun Carroll Chicot Clark Clay Cleburne Cleveland Columbia Conway Craighead Crawford Crittenden Cross Dallas Desha Drew Faulkner Franklin Fulton Garland Grant Greene Hempstead Hot Spring Howard Independence Izard Jackson Jefferson Johnson Lafayette Lawrence Lee Lincoln Little River Logan Lonoke Madison Marion Miller Mississippi Monroe Montgomery Nevada Newton Ouachita Perry Phillips Pike Poinsett Polk Pope 72.9 72.0 81.7 81.5 83.1 73.4 71.7 80.1 55.9 75.1 80.9 82.2 81.2 67.7 76.4 79.1 81.0 62.0 71.6 73.0 62.2 70.7 79.8 80.4 83.9 72.5 86.2 80.9 71.7 79.8 78.8 80.6 83.5 73.5 64.6 79.5 68.3 81.1 59.3 69.0 74.6 78.7 79.7 85.4 81.2 68.1 67.1 62.1 84.3 72.1 84.9 70.6 81.2 55.4 82.6 74.3 80.0 81.0 16.2 16.4 11.6 10.2 10.8 14.1 16.0 12.7 28.1 13.9 12.1 10.0 9.6 20.0 13.2 13.3 11.9 23.5 15.6 14.4 22.3 17.0 10.8 9.4 9.9 16.8 7.7 11.8 16.1 11.7 11.8 10.7 9.1 15.2 21.3 11.0 17.2 11.1 25.4 15.9 15.6 10.4 11.9 7.2 12.2 19.8 20.6 20.7 8.0 15.8 8.7 16.7 8.8 29.6 9.1 16.1 12.3 11.5 10.9 11.5 6.7 8.3 6.1 12.5 12.2 7.2 16.0 11.0 7.0 7.8 9.3 12.3 10.4 7.5 7.2 14.5 12.8 12.7 15.4 12.3 9.4 10.2 6.2 10.7 6.1 7.3 12.2 8.5 9.3 8.7 7.4 11.3 14.1 9.5 14.4 7.8 15.3 15.1 9.8 10.9 8.4 7.4 6.6 12.1 12.3 17.2 7.7 12.1 6.4 12.8 10.0 15.1 8.3 9.6 7.7 7.5 6916 8660 5982 21347 7035 3913 1695 4024 6268 5812 5578 4365 2343 7458 5997 17436 11644 17924 7029 3084 6827 5376 12741 4282 2628 17332 3908 8819 6972 7748 3950 8624 2475 6412 28281 4827 3236 5129 5700 3824 4582 5990 11376 3236 3010 11746 20061 4599 1984 3274 2357 8653 2238 12662 2924 8409 4842 11236 66.6 66.7 77.2 78.9 77.7 64.1 69.3 76.3 44.0 66.7 78.1 77.5 75.5 62.9 70.1 73.5 76.0 54.2 66.5 66.6 57.6 65.3 77.5 77.4 78.4 68.9 81.3 77.5 65.2 73.5 70.5 77.4 79.0 67.8 57.4 75.4 61.1 76.4 47.8 63.8 68.4 74.7 76.9 81.8 76.7 63.1 62.7 54.6 76.7 66.9 83.2 66.1 78.1 46.2 80.9 69.1 77.0 78.2 22.9 20.8 16.4 13.4 15.5 23.4 16.1 16.3 34.5 23.4 13.6 14.9 16.5 23.3 18.6 18.9 16.7 28.4 20.9 19.6 27.7 22.9 15.2 14.0 14.0 20.9 11.5 14.4 23.3 18.3 19.6 14.2 13.2 20.4 27.7 16.5 22.4 15.6 34.4 22.2 19.8 15.0 14.9 10.8 15.6 25.1 25.8 29.7 14.3 20.1 10.4 22.1 12.3 37.0 11.5 20.2 15.1 15.0 10.5 12.6 6.4 7.7 6.9 12.5 14.6 7.4 21.5 9.9 8.3 7.6 8.0 13.8 11.4 7.6 7.3 17.4 12.7 13.9 14.7 11.8 7.3 8.6 7.5 10.2 7.2 8.1 11.4 8.2 9.9 8.4 7.8 11.8 14.9 8.2 16.5 8.1 17.8 14.0 11.8 10.3 8.2 7.4 7.7 11.8 11.5 15.7 9.0 13.0 6.5 11.8 9.6 16.8 7.5 10.7 7.9 6.7 5942 6851 6067 24184 7016 3047 1568 4521 5086 4789 4173 4218 2046 6733 5206 17034 12340 15925 5817 2554 5324 4829 15345 3911 2365 15817 3744 8015 5985 6757 3751 8193 2448 4864 24155 4509 2667 4300 4392 3184 3929 5551 11566 3115 2635 10927 18002 3341 1811 2740 2143 8258 2020 9869 2633 6576 4461 12077 26COUNTY BOTH PARENTS TABLE 10: 1980 SINGLE PARENT LIVING ARRANGEMENTS (CONTINUED) OTHER TOTAL BOTH PARENTS 1990 SINGLE PARENT OTHER TOTAL Prairie Pulaski Randolph Saint Francis Saline Scott Searcy Sebast i an Sevier Sharp Stone Union Van Buren Uashington White Woodruff Yell 80.7 69.0 81.8 63.0 82.6 86.0 84.4 76.2 81.0 81.4 81.4 69.4 80.1 80.8 80.8 66.9 81.8 12.0 21.9 11.2 23.6 10.4 6.2 8.4 15.9 11.1 9.8 9.7 19.0 10.9 11.3 10.8 20.9 10.5 7.3 9.1 7.0 13.4 7.0 7.8 7.2 7.9 7.9 8.7 8.9 11.6 9.0 7.9 8.4 12.3 7.7 3025 100104 4992 11270 16468 2743 2454 27173 4176 3676 2537 13871 3562 25839 14393 3616 4695 74.6 64.2 77.1 53.9 79.2 78.4 80.1 74.3 76.4 77.6 78.5 65.2 76.7 76.8 77.8 58.9 73.2 15.4 25.0 14.9 30.4 13.5 14.2 11.9 18.2 14.6 13.8 14.0 22.4 13.8 16.0 14.4 27.9 16.9 10.0 10.8 8.0 15.7 7.3 7.4 7.9 7.5 9.1 8.5 7.5 12.4 9.5 7.3 7.9 13.2 9.9 2463 91743 4248 9394 17528 2600 1908 25950 3565 3055 2368 12814 3131 28040 13699 2743 4556 I State Totals 73.8 16.2 10.0 671374 69.4 20.3 10.3 621131 271 MAP 12: PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN LIVING WITH BOTH PARENTS, 1990 I CO ,**=*<* I --.st- * H / u%'v'i1!:f* 1i 'ShSS CWN: 8 J if'ri l^g nK*'' o I i i Lk-lV I aa 1 Percentoge Less than 50.0% MB feiisM IWWl W' J"!! iS is "* <5' 1 ' Swl^ g -Cbl Sfflil fssj IG': A'V/'g' PGINSETT. CROSS 100 ST FRAN MlSSr^ 50.0% to 59.9% CRIT 60,0% to 69,9% *1 EwJrd ic MdNf? LEE y : IQ.Qr,, to 79.9% 'HILLIPS 'Tii 80,0% or more : ARKANSAS. JEFF L-RIVER Mik VGLARK .rl DALLAS UtlG OKHA TjEMP mller LAE NEV i OUACH 7 -.^-.f^. fT .calhI- \:.-:-::lBrtAp coLpwei .'UNIOH otew ASHLEy. . 3HICO
Division of Demogrophlc Research Univereity of Arkansas ot Little Rook I i i IBENTON CARRI 7^ I ' CARROLL WASH MAOISM RANK to ID CRAW SEB MAP 13
PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN LIVING WITH ONE PARENT, 1990 7 aOONE MARION NEWTON SEARCY JOHN f r' POPE d LOGAN C 1 YELL SCOTT POLK
1[HOW SEVIEI L RIVER MONTG PIKE iHEMP. ..Y-T MliERj . CAF? J i ruLTON rand J \ C
I SHARiT^--^GREENE / I \IAWR / /___- -Y Jvv Al.LI - . _ J VAN B STONE CLE0 T. INOEP JACK CRAIGHEAD POINSETT-Percenloge Less than 15,0% Mil 15.0% to 19.9% C0NW7
V FAULK PERRY BAF^'d 1^ WPUlASKi! TiSALINE WHITE LONO HOT SPRG grant t-CLARK -
- .'NEV- 1 DALIAS OUACH CALH CLEVE BRAD COLUMB [.UNION WOOOx CROSS: W fess . 20.0% to 24.9% [AIR r" BSP MWRW S .ARKANSAS l L*' -ung - |t?,OESHA^ DREW L ASHLEY 25.0% to 29.9% 30,0% or more Division of Demogrophlc Research University of Arkansas at Little Rock COUNTY TABLE 11: MARITAL STATUS OF FEMALES 15 TEARS OF AGE AND OLDER, 1980-1990 (PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTIONS) 1980 1990 NEVER HARRIED HARRIED DIV/SEP WIDOWED TOTAL NEVER HARRIED HARRIED DIV/SEP WIDOWED TOTAL I I Arkansas Ashley Baxter Benton Boone Bradley Calhoun Carroll Chicot Clark Clay Cleburne Cleveland Columbia Conway Craighead Crawford Crittenden Cross Dallas Desha Drew Faulkner Franklin Fulton Garland Grant Greene Hempstead Hot Spring Howard Independence Izard Jackson Jefferson Johnson Lafayette Lawrence Lee Lincoln Little River Logan Lonoke Madison Marion Miller Mississippi Monroe Montgomery Nevada Newton Ouachita Perry Phillips Pike Poinsett Polk Pope 15.1 16.2 10.2 13.7 14.1 14.8 17.4 13.2 21.9 25.5 12.9 12.1 15.0 19.6 15.9 20.3 13.6 22.5 17.4 16.7 21.1 20.6 26.2 13.5 11.8 13.9 13.8 13.0 15.0 13.7 13.5 14.3 10.4 15.6 21.5 13.8 17.6 13.9 21.9 19.0 16.1 15.6 15.8 12.3 11.5 16.8 18.2 18.6 10.8 15.0 13.4 16.7 13.9 23.4 12.3 15.4 12.5 17.5 61.0 60.2 69.6 67.6 64.2 58.4 57.4 64.7 47.5 53.4 63.0 69.5 64.1 53.9 61.7 58.4 66.5 51.9 59.2 57.7 51.9 56.8 56.3 64.3 67.2 58.9 67.3 64.6 59.5 64.6 60.4 64.6 69.5 58.9 53.3 64.0 54.6 63.1 48.8 56.8 61.1 62.4 63.6 69.5 69.2 56.6 56.7 52.7 69.6 60.0 69.7 56.4 66.9 47.7 65.9 61.1 64.8 62.6 8.3 7.6 5.4 6.8 7.0 6.9 6.2 6.8 10.7 6.3 6.8 5.2 4.5 8.5 6.8 8.7 7.9 11.6 7.8 6.8 9.3 7.9 6.6 6.0 5.6 10.5 5.4 7.9 7.9 6.9 6.6 6.8 4.1 9.0 10.5 6.5 7.6 6.6 10.1 6.3 7.9 6.7 6.9 5.5 5.5 10.7 9.7 9.0 5.5 7.1 5.4 8.4 6.2 10.1 5.3 8.5 6.6 7.5 15.7 16.0 14.7 12.0 14.7 19.9 19.0 15.3 20.0 14.8 17.3 13.2 16.4 18.1 15.6 12.5 12.0 14.0 15.6 18.8 17.7 14.6 10.9 16.2 15.4 16.7 13.6 14.5 17.7 14.8 19.4 14.3 16.0 16.5 14.8 15.6 20.2 16.4 19.2 17.9 14.9 15.3 13.6 12.7 13.7 15.9 15.3 19.8 14.1 17.9 11.5 18.4 13.1 18.9 16.4 15.0 16.1 12.3 9698 10249 11985 31688 10810 5711 2481 6832 6956 9883 8630 6972 3110 11070 7739 25907 14181 18743 7697 4251 7684 7106 18888 5761 4110 30090 5098 12360 9545 10743 5486 12138 4568 8802 35768 7045 4039 7582 6016 4607 5357 7992 13198 4470 4635 15163 22625 5594 3129 4413 2951 12743 2816 13538 4167 10706 6898 15459 16.4 16.9 9.7 12.8 13.0 17.2 15.3 13.3 26.0 26.1 11.1 9.9 15.6 21.1 15.6 20.2 13.3 24.0 19.0 17.7 22.2 21.5 25.5 12.5 10.9 13.4 13.1 12.8 16.5 13.3 15.6 14.2 10.6 15.7 22.7 14.7 17.1 13.3 23.6 18.9 15.9 13.8 14.9 11.8 10.4 17.9 19.1 19.1 10.2 16.7 12.2 16.9 12.9 24.7 11.7 13.8 11.4 16.6 54.6 58.0 65.0 65.3 61.9 53.5 58.4 60.5 42.4 49.3 61.0 66.0 62.2 50.4 58.1 55.3 63.5 48.0 55.5 53.9 48.8 53.1 55.0 62.4 64.0 57.4 65.2 61.9 54.6 60.6 56.5 61.1 63.9 55.1 49.4 58.9 52.5 59.0 45.4 54.2 58.5 60.8 62.6 66.5 65.3 53.0 53.9 49.0 65.4 54.7 66.8 53.8 63.8 42.7 64.5 58.4 63.4 61.0 10.9 9.4 8.3 9.8 10.3 9.5 9.4 11.3 12.3 9.0 9.5 9.1 6.9 10.9 10.6 11.8 11.4 14.2 10.5 10.0 10.5 10.6 9.5 9.5 8.1 12.7 8.0 10.7 11.1 10.3 10.4 10.5 7.7 11.5 12.7 9.7 10.3 9.9 12.0 9.3 10.9 9.6 10.2 7.7 9.2 13.6 12.0 11.3 8.7 10.2 7.4 11.5 8.3 12.8 7.1 11.4 9.3 10.6 18.1 15.7 17.0 12.1 14.9 19.9 16.9 14.9 19.3 15.6 18.4 15.0 15.3 17.6 15.6 12.8 11.8 13.7 15.1 18.4 18.6 14.8 10.0 15.6 17.0 16.5 13.8 14.6 17.8 15.8 17.5 14.1 17.8 17.8 15.2 16.7 20.0 17.8 19.0 17.7 14.6 15.8 12.3 14.0 15.1 15.5 15.0 20.6 15.6 18.4 13.7 17.8 15.0 19.8 16.7 16.4 15.9 11.7 8985 9818 13944 40125 11949 5003 2385 7826 6443 9334 7807 8301 3170 10855 7829 28873 16762 19741 7690 4000 6726 7093 24801 5992 4246 32099 5579 13235 8877 10828 5550 12810 4944 7977 34566 7569 3986 7409 5187 4301 5599 8273 15334 4627 5131 15642 22351 4695 3250 4192 2967 12772 3240 11561 4120 10131 7121 18389 30COUNTY TABLE 11: 1980 HARITAL STATUS OF FEMALES (CONT I HUED) NEVER MARRIED MARRIED DIV/SEP WIDOWED TOTAL 1990 NEVER MARRIED MARRIED DIV/SEP WIDOWED TOTAL I Prairie Pulaski Randolph Saint Francis Saline Scott Searcy Sebastian Sevi er Sharp Stone Union Van Buren Washington White Woodruff Yell 16.0 20.5 14.5 21.3 15.3 12.7 13.5 16.1 13.9 11.1 13.6 16.5 11.0 22.4 19.3 18.0 13.7 63.6 54.0 64.6 52.4 66.4 67.8 66.3 59.1 63.8 70.0 67.8 56.2 70.2 59.0 60.7 55.0 64.7 6.1 12.9 5.9 10.1 7.7 4.7 5.4 10.8 6.5 5.2 5.7 9.1 5.6 8.0 6.3 8.4 6.0 14.4 12.6 15.0 16.2 10.6 14.8 14.8 14.0 15.9 13.7 12.9 18.3 13.2 10.6 13.7 18.6 15.6 3981 137690 6712 11699 20374 3840 3575 38954 5621 6040 3602 20177 5409 40089 20600 4474 6936 14.5 21.9 12.6 22.7 14.5 11.2 11.9 15.8 13.0 10.6 10.7 17.1 10.7 21.0 17.8 19.0 12.6 60.5 50.6 61.7 47.6 64.6 64.5 64.9 57.1 61.1 64.2 65.9 53.9 65.7 56.9 59.2 49.6 61.9 9.1 15.3 9.5 13.2 10.5 8.6 7.5 13.5 10.3 8.0 8.9 11.6 8.6 11.3 9.2 11.5 10.6 15.9 12.2 16.3 16.5 10.5 15.6 15.7 13.6 15.7 17.2 14.5 17.4 15.1 10.8 13.8 19.9 14.8 3888 145656 6880 11411 25561 4167 3239 40912 5479 6182 4042 19394 5915 45744 22629 3939 7316 State Totals 17.5 59.3 8.8 14.5 917656 17.5 56.5 11.5 14.4 966364 I 31bJ hJ MAP 14: KI WASH-SEB . PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN CURRENTLY MARRIED, 1990 mMMR , *'i: 5^C*D/"*V^ SELWGYS Percentage Less than 50,0% r* CRAISHEAO CRAW ..-KT POINSETT I MISSr- 0\ 50.0% to 54.9% .LOGAN'ji^ > T2--- -t Ph. JfauIk: ./WOOD CROSS CRIT 55.0% to 59.9% . A Li. ' 'Z" T'HiYh itl'.v. SYECG iS SCOKj WTF'.ii PERRVil W' ST FRAN V- PLILASK1 lO' LEE IS I POCR:^? ww VW'ii VI *''"' -. iTy'a^Jh a .MONR 'HILUPS ' TW'' SSEMEF ^HEMP JIUER LAB iHOTiSPRG /F-l CLARK NEV .'h DALLAS OUACH J ... fVcALH COLUMB UNldN JEFF ^/bmd arkwjsas , "UNG' DESHA DREVll A^l^. . 3HICO: 60.0% to 64.9% 65,0% or more Division of Demographic Research Unlvereity of Arkansas at Little Rock MAP 15
PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN NEVER MARRIED, 1990 7 BENTON CARROLL aOONE FULTON MARION BAX J \ RAND j CLAY Percentage Fgfl ^1 MAOISM NEWTON SEARCY IZARD STONE SHARf LAWR 'GREEiNfe" Less than 12.50% 1 INOEP 12.50% to 14.99% RANK w U) CRAW s'eSa SCOTT POLK JOHN ropE-VAN B CLEB jf LOGAN CONW-a ? /YELL PERRY. MONTG OARLNO SALINE ...................... Y, 15.00% to 17.49% 4 LONO PRAIR 17.50% to 19.99% HOT SPRQ CRANT >jiaKA^ISAS 20.00% or more PIKE SEMEI X'RIVER^HEMP. NEV lOUACH CALH Dfvisfon of Demographic Research ^ILLEB-J Univereity of Arkansas at Little Rock s^.tAfA 'UNION BENTOn 55carroll! RO MAP 16: PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN DIVORCED OR SEPARATED, 1990 7 BOONE FULTON Percentage BAX RANp. WASH t 1 ' ''-TfesJ MADISN NEWTON T MARION SEARCY IZARD SIHHAARRPP-.-. 'iAW CLAY Less than 8,50% CRAW >5 i' 1 STONE 'ram< LOGAN SCOTT POLK ll-HOW SEViEI VAN 8 'rpA tZ f MONTG n PIKE L^'RIVE^&^^fe I) CLEB 3EJ H a.50% to 9.49% PERRY 4xl FAULK grant g CLARK NEV- - IZj-- J. -COLUMS , : DALLAS CALH / WHITE LOND. CUEVE RA(R 4ll, *tl VH LING DEJ H iHW R1, Uh IS !3nr>c\M>fei LffiW' ASHLE?r\' 9.50% to 10,49% 10.50% to 11.49% 11,50% or more DIvtsfon of Demographic Research Univereity of Arkansas at Little Rook MAP 17: PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN WIDOWED, 1990 BENTON WASH 7 0.:': HOdNE .: MADISN L NEWdN' RAM< CO UI CRAW fe,r POPE SES 7^ COGAN YELL .K f^Gv 1 IS Vp-'- >M \ ION lOY, EUX* SO VAN B CONW: peRftY- A tPtKra p FULTON '.i'lS t, 1 CRAIGHEAD MISS, CLEB fJAcIi, raNSElXi PAULK Percentoge Less than 12.50% 12.50% to 14.49% WHITE GROSS 14,50% to 16.49% . ...t .GARLND'ip, PULASKI LONO !AIR 16.50% to 18.49% Ai^.BlSALJNE I'A r< GRANT :<\jEFF. iS' ARKANSASt 9 18,50% or more I V, . . . T L-%i ark
w ci^bAtLAsK'.- ..-. ivp. L@ w hfiS.% JK?fSkH> DREW Division of Demogrophlc Research Univereity of Arkansas at Little Rock ASHLEY. . jiva:'County TABLE 12: PER CAPITA MONEY INCOME FOR ARKANSAS COUNTIES, 1979 (FROM 1980 CENSUS) AND 1987 (ESTIMATED) 1987 $ 1979 $ 1979 1987 %Chng 1987 %Chng Rank in 1979 Rank in Rank in 1987 %Chng Arkansas Ashley Baxter Benton Boone Bradley Calhoun Carroll Chicot Clark Clay Cleburne Cleveland Columbia Conway Craighead Crawford Crittenden Cross Dallas Desha Drew Faullaier Franklin Fulton Garland Grant Greene Hempstead Hot Spring Howard Independence Izard Jackson Jefferson Johnson Lafayette Lawrence Lee Lincoln Little River Logan Lonoke Madison Marion Miller 6054 5203 5719 6100 5434 4563 4257 5238 4091 5546 4794 5093 4833 5526 5091 5839 5166 4942 5160 5547 5063 5283 5574 4684 4272 6357 5674 5143 5095 5463 5280 5092 4784 5197 5476 5132 4362 4617 3447 4157 5723 4604 5434 4381 4940 5428 8885 8172 9859 10498 8868 7408 6600 8696 5859 8237 7984 8425 7372 9048 8242 9562 8376 7600 7772 8871 7219 8067 9081 7736 6901 10151 9064 8228 8273 7754 8076 8094 8227 7956 8409 8050 6815 7199 4942 6160 9181 7630 8779 7396 9311 8845 46.8 57.1 72.4 72.1 63.2 62.3 55.0 66.0 43.2 48.5 66.5 65.4 52.5 63.7 61.9 63.8 62.1 53.8 50.6 59.9 42.6 52.7 62.9 65.2 61.5 59.7 59.7 60.0 62.4 41.9 53.0 59.0 72.0 53.1 53.6 56.9 56.2 55.9 43.4 48.2 60.4 65.7 61.6 68.8 88.5 63.0 5678 5223 6301 6709 5667 4734 4218 5557 3744 5264 5102 5384 4711 5782 5267 6111 5353 4857 4967 5669 4614 5155 5804 4944 4410 6487 5793 5258 5287 4955 5161 5173 5258 5085 5374 5145 4355 4601 3158 3937 5867 4876 5611 4727 5951 5653 -6.2 0.4 10.2 10.0 4.3 3.8 -0.9 6.1 -8.5 -5.1 6.4 5.7 -2.5 4.6 3.5 4.7 3.6 -1.7 -3.7 2.2 -8.9 -2.4 4.1 5.5 3.2 2.1 2.1 2.2 3.8 -9.3 -2.2 1.6 9.9 -2.2 -1.9 0.2 -0.2 -0.4 -8.4 -5.3 2.5 5.9 3.2 7.9 20.5 4.1 6 28 11 5 20 60 68 26 71 16 50 38 48 17 40 9 31 43 33 15 41 24 13 56 67 4 12 34 37 19 25 39 53 30 18 36 65 57 75 70 10 58 21 62 44 22 16 33 5 3 18 55 66 21 74 30 41 24 58 15 29 7 26 52 47 17 59 37 13 50 63 4 14 31 28 48 36 35 32 42 25 39 65 60 75 71 12 51 20 56 10 19 69 48 3 4 21 26 54 12 72 66 10 14 60 19 28 18 27 55 62 38 73 59 23 16 33 41 40 36 25 74 58 43 5 57 56 49 51 53 71 67 35 13 32 7 1 22 36 County TABLE 12: 1979 PER CAPITA MONEY INCOME (CONTINUED) 1987 $ 1979 $ 1987 %Chng 1987 5, -6 Chng Rank in 1979 Rank in 1987 b Rank in :Chng Mississippi Monroe Montgomery Nevada Newton Ouachita Perry Phillips Pike Poinsett Polk Pope Prairie Pulaski Randolph Saint Francis Saline Scott Searcy Sebastian Sevier Sharp Stone Union Van Buren Washington White Woodruff Yell 4791 4292 4548 4976 3554 5335 4781 4177 5166 5138 5238 5574 4900 7133 4841 4380 6416 4374 3765 6834 5198 4792 4038 5878 4770 5852 4860 4572 4801 7562 6258 7387 7865 6064 8631 7877 6232 8059 8144 8479 9307 6925 11797 7739 6439 9557 7154 5993 11054 7834 7489 6345 9402 8345 9781 7827 6866 7988 57.8 45.8 62.4 58.1 70.6 61.8 64.8 49.2 56.0 58.5 61.9 67.0 41.3 65.4 59.9 47.0 49.0 63.6 59.2 61.8 50.7 56.3 57.1 60.0 74.9 67.1 61.0 50.2 66.4 4833 3999 4721 5026 3875 5516 5034 3983 5150 5205 5419 5948 4426 7539 4946 4115 6108 4572 3830 7064 5007 4786 4055 6009 5333 6251 5002 4388 5105 0.9 -6.8 3.8 1.0 9.0 3.4 5.3 -4.6 -0.3 1.3 3.5 6.7 -9.7 5.7 2.2 -6.0 -4.8 4.5 1.7 3.4 -3.7 -0.1 0.4 2.2 11.8 6.8 2.9 -4.0 6.3 52 66 61 42 74 23 54 69 32 35 27 14 45 1 47 63 3 64 73 2 29 51 72 7 55 8 46 59 49 53 69 57 44 72 22 43 70 38 34 23 11 62 1 49 67 8 61 73 2 45 54 68 9 27 6 46 64 40 46 70 24 45 6 30 17 64 52 44 29 9 75 15 39 68 65 20 42 31 61 50 47 37 2 8 34 63 11 State Totals 5613 9061 61.4 5791 3.2 U.S. Totals 7295 11923 63.4 7620 4.5 State/U.S. 76.9 76.0 96.8 CPI 72.6 113.6 56.5 37 w co MAP 18: ESTIMATED CHANGE IN PER CAPITA 1979-1987 SEBi-tfeM ?fs
al 5!5 we: i S&PCY: coNw
MONEY INCOME, STONE SHARP I'NQE.P:
WITE- :fWiD LAWR JACK 'wood 'GftFENE.: h^Nsm? CROSS ST FRAN MIS
CRIT Percentoge Change Real income loss Greater than inflation Greater than AR avg. ^S^MoifTGi! QARLND' SAUNE HOW SEMEI eft! IVER L-, PIKE HEMP? jiller
HOT SPRG /ORAHTi CLARK DAU-AS .NEV LAFAfS :o6aChW CALH UNION: 'SKfflPRAIR )WN01 JEPF CLEVE I LEE MONR' HILLIPS ARKANSAS LINO DREW ESHA M Greater than US avg. JfJ ASHLEY
hico
Division of Demographic Research Univereity of Arkansas at Little Rock I DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE IN THE STATE OF ARILANSAS. 1980-1990 Dr. Lawrence Santi < Division of Demographic Research University of .Arkansas at Little Rock Little Rock, AR 72204 501 569-8571 Prepared for presentation at the Third Annual Governor's Conference on Leadership The Arlington Hotel Hot Springs, Arkansas May 19-20, 1991 0 Il I VI N DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGE IN THE STATE OF ARKANSAS, 1980-1990 II Dr. Lawrence Santi Division of Demographic Research University of Arkansas at Little Rock |l ii Little Rock, AR 501-569-8571 72204 II HH B Prepared for presentation at the Third Annual Governor's Conference on Leadership The Arlington Hotel Hot Springs, Arkansas May 19-20, 1991 INCOME AND EDUCATION IN ARKANSAS AND THE U.S., 1980: IMPLICATIONS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Dr. Lawrence Santi Division of Demographic Research University of Arkansas at Little Rock Little Rock, AR 72204 March 7, 1991 The relationship between income and education in modern industrial societies is about as close as one gets to a universal finding within the social sciences. Although the precise magnitude of the relationship may vary from society to society, from historical period to historical period, and across subgroups within a society, it is generally true that one's income increases with one's level of educational attainment. In the present note, we present data from the 1980 Census of the Population about the relationship between income and education in the State of Arkansas and in the U.S. as a whole. Income and education data were collected on the "long-form" Census guestionnaire, which was distributed to about one-sixth of U.S. households. Income received in the calendar year prior to the Census (i.e., 1979) from seven different sources (egs., wage and salary income, interest and dividend income, social security income, public assistance income) was reported for each person listed on the long-form questionnaire. Thus the data presented in this report refer to income received from all of these sources by specific individuals rather than to the total income received by all members of a household or family considered together. Education was measured by reports for each individual of the number of years of regular schooling he or she completed. Specific instructions were included to make sure that persons receiving a GED certificate were recorded with 12 years of schooling, but apart from this there were no specific questions about the receipt of other diplomas or degrees. Thus a person reporting 16 years of school completed may or may not have actually earned a four-year college degree, although we will assume that most have. In view of well-known differences in income between men and women, data are presented separately for each sex. The universe for this analysis is restricted to persons 18 years of age or older at the time of the 1980 Census, an age-break which corresponds roughly to some notion of an "adult" population. Income and Education: The Basic Findings Table 1 and Figure 1 present data on median income by years of schooling, for men and women, and for Arkansas and the U.S. as a whole. Across all four of these population subgroups, we see that median incomes did indeed increase with increasing education. Arkansas men with less than 8 years of schooling received, on average, $4,795 in income, while their counterparts with 19 or more years of schooling received $20,981. Another way of stating these results is that the most educated Arkansas men earned, on average, 4.4 times as much as the least educated Arkansas men. Completing 12 years of school rather than 9 to 11 years (roughly speaking, the difference between graduating from high school and dropping out) raised the median income of Arkansas men from $7,774 to $10,892, an increase of 40.1%. Completing 16 years rather than 12 years (roughly, the difference between a four-year college degree and a high school diploma) raised the median income of Arkansas men by another 51.0%, to $16,451. For Arkansas women, median incomes ranged from $2,500 for the least educated to $11,688 for the most educated, a ratio of 4.7:1. (In reporting these obvious gender differences in median incomes, we note that these particular income data do not take into account differences between men and women in labor force status and number of hours worked.) The "credential premiums" for Arkansas women were 56.5% for a high school diploma and 65.1% for a college degree. As far as Arkansas to U.S. comparisons are concerned, we see that the median income of all Arkansas men (ignoring educational levels) was only 74.6% of the median of U.S. men in general. Arkansas women seemed to fare relatively better than did Arkansas men, with an overall median income that was 78.3% that of U.S. women in general. (This latter finding is probably due more to the relatively disadvantaged income position of women in U.S. society as a whole than it is to any particular committment to gender equality in the State of Arkansas.) The ratio of Arkansas to U.S. median incomes varied across educational levels, and it did so in slightly different ways for men and for women. For men, the income ratios increased up to the "13-15 years of schooling" category, at which point Arkansas men received almost 86% as much in income as did U.S. men in general. So it would seem that having completed some amount of post-secondary education, although not necessarily completing a college degree, put Arkansas men at the most advantageous income position relative to U.S. men in general. Not only were there not additional increases in the income ratio with further increases in education, but there was actually a relative loss experienced by Arkansas men with 17 or 18 years of schooling
indeed. 2Arkansas men with 17 or 18 years of schooling received a scant $42 more than did Arkansas men with 16 years of education. Among women, the Arkansas to U.S. income ratios increased with education up to the 12th grade level, decreased slightly for women with some college, but then increased to near parity Beyond the "college graduate" (97.7%) at the 16-year level. . _ , level, however, the income position of Arkansas women relative to all American women actually worsened with further increases in education. The "credential premiums" for both men and women (and especially for women) were slightly higher in Arkansas than they were in the U.S. as a whole, probably due to the generally lower levels of educational attainment in Arkansas relative to the U.S. (more about this later). However, the Arkansas to U.S. income ratios suggest that an individual might easily obtain "too much education" for the State Relative to incomes they might receive elsewhere in of Arkansas. the U.S., the point of diminishing returns comes after the completion of one to three years of college for men, and beyond the bachelor's degree level for women. Increasing Education as an Economic Development Strategy In the preceding section, we alluded to "generally lower levels of educational attainment in Arkansas relative to the U.S.". In the present section, we examine this assertion more thoroughly and discuss some of the implications of the available evidence for income growth/economic development strategies in the State of Arkansas. Basic comparative data on educational attainment are presented in Table 2, and Figures 2 (for males) and 3 (for females). For men, we see that Arkansas had an excess (relative to the U.S. as a whole) of persons with less than 12 years of schooling, a deficit of persons with more than 12 years of schooling, and an approximately equal percentage of persons with exactly 12 years Overall, 58.3% of Arkansas men had 12 or more of schooling. years of education (compared to 68.5% of U.S. men) while 11.5% of Arkansas men had 16 or more years of schooling (compared to 17.4% of U.S. men). Arkansas women had a The pattern for women is quite similar, relative excess of persons with less than 12 years of education. and relative deficits of persons with 12 or more years of schooling. Almost identically to the men, 57.7% of Arkansas women had 12 or more years of schooling, compared to 68.0% of U.S. women. And 8.2% of Arkansas women had 16 or more years of schooling, compared to 11.7% of U.S. women. 3Given the relationships between income and education discussed in the previous section, one might well raise the question of what the U.S.-Arkansas income gap would look like if Arkansans had the same educational levels as the U.S. population as a whole. Data bearing on this hypothetical question are presented in Table 3. Table 3 displays, in separate panels for men and women, percentaged educational distributions and mean income^ by education for both the U.S. and Arkansas. Looking first at the "Totals" rows, we observe a difference of $3,360 between the mean income of Arkansas men and the mean income of men in the U.S. a whole, and a difference of $1,431 among women. as In the rows beneath the "Totals" rows (labelled "Assuming U.S. education") we provide hypothetical estimates of what the mean incomes for Arkansas men and women would be if Arkansas men and women had the same educational distributions as their same-sex counterparts in the U.S as a whole. We see that under these upgraded educational conditions, the mean income of Arkansas men would increase from $12,223 to $13,448, while the mean income of Arkansas women would increase from $5,612 to $6,027. The U.S.-Arkansas differences in mean incomes would decrease from $3,360 to $2,136 for men, and from $1,431 to $1,016 for women. These calculations show that approximately 36% of the income difference between Arkansas and U.S. males, and 29% of the income difference between Arkansas and U.S. females, is due to the lower levels of educational attainment observed among Arkansas men and women. These data and calculations provide some basis for assessing the potential impact of improved educational attainment on the economic well-being of Arkansans. The first observation is that if only one-third of the income gap between Arkansas and the U.S. can be attributed to educational differences (slightly more than one-third for men, slightly less for women), then the remaining two-thirds are due to factors other than education. The net effects of these "other factors" are reflected in the fact that at each level of education, Arkansas incomes (whether they be means or medians, for men or for women) are still significantly lower than those of comparable groups in the U.S. as a whole. These income differences that exist within educational levels suggest that for whatever cultural, historical, political, and/or economic reasons, Arkansas society simply does not reward educational achievement to the same extent that the larger American society does. This conclusion is consistent with some of our earlier observations on the relationship between income and education in the State of Arkansas, particularly as compared to the overall We noted that the U.S.-Arkansas income gap U.S. patterns. decreased as education increased, but only up to a certain point. 4(That point was "some college" for Arkansas men and a college degree for Arkansas women.) Upgrading the educational level of the population of the State of Arkansas will improve the economic well-being of Arkansans only to the extent that the economy is capable of absorbing a better- educated workforce. And to the extent that more educated Arkansans can fare relatively better outside of the State, educational upgrades (particularly at the post-secondary level) may only seirve to enhance out-migration. The foregoing discussion is certainly not intended to suggest that Arkansas abandon its attempts to improve its educational resources at all levels, although it might well be so misconstirued. However, it is intended to caution against having unrealistic expectations about a purely education-based strategy for economic development. We must ask ourselves some serious questions about local demand for an educated populace as well as the supply. Are business and economic development leaders earnestly committed to improving the overall quality of life in the State of Arkansas (an important component of which is a first-rate educational system), or are our education and economic development strategies operating independently of one another, or even at cross-purposes? It would appear that only when education is embraced as part of a comprehensive economic development strategy that promotes the kinds of economic activities that can tinily benefit from a better-educated population can economic development efforts in the State of Arkansas be expected to succeed. 5Notes 1. The median is the middle value (or 50th percentile) in a set of observations, when those observations are arranged in order from lowest to highest. For example, the median income of $4,795 for Arkansas males with 0 to 7 years of schooling (shown in Table 1) means that 50% of Arkansas men with that level of education had incomes less than the median while the remaining 50% had incomes above the median. 2. The mean is yet another summary measure of the "central tendency" of a set of observations. It is calculated by summing all the incomes of persons within a given educational category and dividing this sum by the number of persons within that category. A comparison of the mean incomes in Table 3 with the corresponding median incomes in Table 1 will show that the means are, in this case, generally higher than the corresponding medians. This is because means are more sensitive to extreme values (in this case, unusually large values) than are medians. We made the switch from median incomes to mean incomes not to be perverse or obscure, but because means possess certain desirable mathematical properties that medians do not, and these desirable properties will permit the kinds of calculations we'll be performing below. 6Table 1: Median Income in 1979 by Years of School Completed, by Sex, Arkansas and the U.S. Years of Schooling AR Males U.S. AR as % of U.S. Females AR U.S. AR as % of U.S. 0-7 8 9-11 12 13-15 16 17-18 19+ 4795 6469 7774 10892 11791 16451 16493 20981 6438 8521 9686 13149 13724 19224 20822 24770 74.5 75.9 80.3 82.8 85.9 85.6 79.2 84.7 2500 2895 3513 5499 5652 9080 11048 11688 3195 3666 4183 6085 6511 9296 12227 13859 78.2 79.0 84.0 90.4 86.8 97.7 90.4 84.3 All Education Levels 9465 12686 74.6 4318 5514 78.3 Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1980 Census of the Population, Volume 1: Chapter D: Characteristics of the Population, Detailed Population Charactersitics, Part 1, Table 296 (for the U.S.) Part 5, Table 237 (for Arkansas) Compiled by the Division of Demographic Research, University of Arkansas at Little Rock.Table 2: Percentage Distribution of Years of School Completed, by Sex, Arkansas and the U.S. Years of Schooling Males AR U.S. AR as % of U.S. Females AR U.S. AR as % of U.S. 0-7 8 9-11 12 13-15 16 17-18 19+ 15.3 9.0 17.4 33.5 13.3 6.3 3.2 2.0 9.1 6.7 15.7 33.6 17.6 8.8 4.8 3.7 68.0 33.4 11.3 -0.3 -24.2 -28.7 -33.6 -45.4 12.4 9.8 20.1 37.1 12.4 5.4 2.3 0.5 8.4 7.1 16.5 39.0 17.2 7.2 3.4 1.1 47.1 38.3 21.5 -4.8 -28.0 -24.7 -33.7 -53.7 Totals N 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 760910 77404802 854322 85348678 Percentage With: Males AR U.S. AR as % of U.S. Females AR U.S. AR as % of U.S. 12+ years 16+ years 58.3 11.5 68.5 17.4 -14.9 -33.6 57.7 8.2 68.0 11.7 -15.1 -30.1 Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1980 Census of the Population, Volume 1: Chapter D: Characteristics of the Population, Detailed Population Charactersitics, Part 1, Table 296 (for the U.S.) Part 5, Table 237 (for Arkansas) Compiled by the Division of Demographic Research, University of Arkansas at Little Rock.<u cn o c <D U <U Q. 30 25 20 15 10 0 35 5 40 0) cn D c o u l_ 0) CL 40 30 25 20 10 5 0 35 15 45 Table 3: Adjusting Arkansas Mean Income by the U.S. Educational Distribution, by Sex Males Yrs. of Schooling Educational Distribution Mean Income AR US AR US Diff. 0-7 8 9-11 12 13-15 16 17-18 19+ 15.3 9.0 17.4 33.5 13.3 6.3 3.2 2.0 9.1 6.7 15.7 33.6 17.6 8.8 4.8 3.7 6879 8457 9446 12732 14238 20960 20601 31075 8635 10856 11693 14792 15886 23561 24666 32574 Totals 100.0 100.0 12223 15584 3360 Assuming U.S. education Percent of income difference due to education differences 13448 15584 2136 36.4 Females Yrs. of Schooling Educational Distribution Mean Income AR US AR US Diff. 0-7 8 9-11 12 13-15 16 17-18 19+ 12.4 9.8 20.1 37.1 12.4 5.4 2.3 0.5 8.4 7.1 16.5 39.0 17.2 7.2 3.4 1.1 3242 3889 4525 6093 6779 9312 10824 12945 4198 4795 5454 7083 7825 10231 12539 15307 Totals 100.0 100.0 5612 7043 1431 Assuming U.S. education Percent of income difference due to education differences 6027 7043 1016 29.0 Calculations by the Division of Demographic Research, University of Arkansas at Little Rock.Education alone cant boost economy development efforts in the state of One of the primary indicators of Arkansas be expected to succeed. the economic well-being of an area is the level of income received by its residents. ranks of the 50 states and the And by just about any income measure, Arkansas has historically place near the bottom of the Development plans must VDork in concert with education. years of education actually received relatively less income (compared to similarly educated men in the U.S. as a whole) than did Arkansas men with 16 years of schooling. And even though Arkansas women with 16 years of . Quest writer Dr. Lawrence Santi is chief of the division of demographic research at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock. between education and economic education achieved near-parity 5vith their same-sex counterparts in the U.S. as a whole, the income gap between Arkansas and U.S. women increased with further in-creases in education. One cynical conclusion that Lawrence might be drawn is that a successful Santi lumbia. According to data from the performance has become a critical public policy issue at both state and national levels. Indeed, in an address to the Wilowe Institute stares ana tne last fall. Governor Clinton stated District of Co- categorically that at this parti<^lar point in time, income growth in -------- Arkansas is limited only by the campaign to increase the educa-educational level of its population, tional level of the Arkansas popu- However, 1980 Census date on lation could serve only to enhance the education-income relationship out-migration,'as these more edu-suggest a degree of caution in our cated Arkansans leave the state to expectations of educational up- 1980 Census, the per capita money income of Arkansans stood at about 77 percent of the national average, putting the state in 50th eipBvwBwu. u* -------------- place, edging out Mississippi by grading as a lever for economic $430. By 1987, the Census Bureau development. .. estimated that Arkansas had risen to 47th place, inching ahead of South Dakota, Louisiana and West Virginia, even though per capita income had dropped slightly in relation to the U.S. average, to 76 seek their fortunes elsewhere. And data from the 1980 Census do pro-vide some evidence of a brain drain among younger Arkemsans. The median incomes of individuals do indeed increase with their - ----- - _ - educational levels, for men and for make vnth this analysis however The real point that 1 hope to llal Icvcio, lUl *.V* ------- - - in Arkansas and in the is that we must ask ourselves some percent. , Running parallel to the state s historically low income rankings are similarly low rankings in educational attainments. According to the 1980 Census, the most recent comprehensive data source, only 55 percent of Arkansas adults were reported as having completed 12 or more years of schooling, compared to 66 percent of the U.S. adult population as a whole. Only Kentucky and South Carolina and lower percentages of high school graduates. In the percentage of college graduates, Arkansas came in dead last. It doesnt take a whole lot of development activities likely to uTasaShSkK^M .vS hard questions about local dern^d level of education, Arkansas men for an educated populace as well as and women received less income factors affecting ^he supply. Is the than their counterparts in the state economy capable of^hsorb^ larger society. These differences mg and rewarding a more educated place a definite limit on how much labor force? Are current economic we could expect to raise income in Arkansas merely by raising the bring about expanded opportuni-state^ education^ level. My calcu- ties for a more educated labor force lations show that even if Arkan- sans had the same educational education and economic develop-characteristics as the U.S. popula- ment strategies'operatingincon-tion as a whole, the over^l Arkan- cert, with each other i^pen-ties for a more educated labor force in the future? In short, are our m-lTs. income gap would only be dently, or even at cross-purposes! reduced by about one-third. The data we have reviewed strongly Suggest that only when education is embraced as part of a ment strategy that nurtures the But what is perhaps even more distressing from the point of view -------- _ _ of economic development strategy comprehensive economic develop-is that the income gap showed no clear tendency to decrease as levels kinds of economic activities that curiosity to wonder if these two of education increase. On the con- d""ntye^r^T^^^^^ with iY orW ucated population can economic can truly benefit from a better-ed- <1 PREFACE The data presented in this document come from the first major release of detailed data from the 1990 Census of the Population. (An earlier release of 1990 Census data for reapportionment purposes, as mandated by Public Law 94171, contained a minimal number of population characteristics.) Generally speaking, data from the decennial censuses (and the printed reports based on these data) are organized and released in terms of "SummarY Tape Files (or STFs). STF data ate released first in machine-readable format, with the official printed reports following in a year or so. As with the 1980 Census, data from the 1990 Census are organized into four major STFs. STFs 1 and 2 contain "complete count" data items that were gathered from all Census respondents, items consist mainly of basic demographic characteristics such age, race, sex, household relationship, marital and family These data as status, and so on. I STFs 3 and 4 contain "sample" data items that were gathered only for those Census respondents who received the "long form" Census mioeHnnnai rti _ annmYimatelv onesixth of all households. These questionnaire, approximately one-nornnnmif, characteristics such as data items include more "socioeconomic education, income, labor force status, and the like. Unfortunately, STF3 data are still about a year away. This document is based on Summary Tape File 1, which was received by the Arkansas State Data Center on May 1, Out of the literally hundreds of data items available on STFl, I extracted a subset that I hoped would be of fairly general interest. 1991. I Those who want a more comprehensive overview of 1990 Census data products should contact the State Data Center, located on the UALR campus, at 569-8530. 11THEMATIC LISTING OF TABLES AND MAPS Population Change and Its components for the state as a Whole Table 1: Analysis of Population Change in the State of Arkansas, 1980 to 1990......................................... 1 Table 2: Components of Population Change for the State of Arkansas, 1940 to 1990....................... 1 Population Change and Its Components for Arkansas Counties Table 3: Components of Population Change for Arkansas Counties, 1980 to 1990........................................ 2 Map 1: Population Change among Arkansas Counties, 1980-1990 4 Map 2
Map 3
Natural Increase among Arkansas Counties, 1980-1990 5 Net Migration among Arkansas Counties, 1980-1990 6 General Population characteristics for Arkansas Counties 7 Table 4: Age Structure of Arkansas Counties, 1980-1990 Map 4: Percentage of the Population Under 18 Years of Age, 1990....9 Map 5: Percentage of the Population 65 Years of Age or Older, 1990......................................... 10 Table 5
Gender Composition of Arkansas Counties, 1980-1990 11 Map 6: Sex Ratio of Arkansas Counties, 1990 13 Table 6: Racial Composition of the State of Arkansas, 1980-1990...14 Table 7: The Black Population of Arkansas Counties, 1980-1990 15 The Black Population of Arkansas Counties, 1990 17 Map 7: Household and Family Structure within Arkansas Counties Table 8: Basic Data on Living Arrangements for Arkansas Counties, 1980-1990.............................................. 18 Map 8: Percentage of the Population in Group Quarters, 1990 20 1X1I I THEMATIC LISTING OF TABLES AND MAPS (CONTINUED) I Map 9: Average Household Size, 1990 21 Table 9: I Households by Type of Household for Arkansas Counties, 1980-1990........................................... 22 I Map 10: Map 11: Percentage of Households Headed by Married Couples, 1990.............................................. Percentage of Households That Are Female-Headed Families, 1990.............................................. 24 25 I Table 10: Living Arrangements of Persons Under 18 Years of Age, 1980-1990......................................... 26 Map 12: Percentage of Children Living with Both Parents, 1990 28 Map 13: Percentage of Children Living with One Parent, 1990 29 Table 11: Marital Status of Females 15 Years of Age and Older, 1980-1990........................................ 30 I I I Map 14: Map 15: Percentage of Women Currently Married, Percentage of Women Never Married, 1990 1990 32 33 Map 16: Percentage of Women Divorced or Separated, 1990 34 Map 17: Percentage of Women Widowed, 1990 35 I The Shape of Things to Come? Change in Economic Well-Being among Arkansas Counties Table 12: Per Capita Money Income for Arkansas Counties, 1979 (from 1980 Census) and 1987 (Estimates) 36 I I I Map 18: Estimated Change in Per Capita Money Income, 1979-1987....38 IV ITABLE 1: ANALYSIS OF POPULATION CHANGE IN THE STATE OF ARKANSAS, 1980 TO 1990 1980 Population 1990 Population Growth, 1980-1990 Percentage Growth, 1980-1990 I 2,286,357 2,350,725 64,368 2.8 Births, 1980-1989 Deaths, 1980-1989 Natural Increase, 1980-1989 Percentage Natural Increase, Estimate of 1990 Population, based on natural increase 1980-1989 353,000 236,000 117,000 5.1 2,403,357 Implied Net Migration, 1980-1990 Implied Percentage Migration, 1980-1990 TABLE 2: -52,632 -2.3 COMPONENTS OF POPULATION CHANGE FOR THE STATE OF ARKANSAS, 1940 TO 1990 COMPONENTS OF INTERCENSAL CHANGE CENSUS POPULATION INTERCENSAL CHANGE % NATURAL % NATL. NET CHNG. INCREASE INC. MIGRATION % NET MIG. 1940 1949387 1950 1909511 -39876 -123239 1960 1786272 137023 1970 1923295 363062 1980 2286357 64368 1990 2350725 -2.0 -6.5 7.7 18.9 2.8 375000 307698 188095 131764 117000 19.2 16.1 10.5 6.9 5.1 -414876 -430937 -51072 231376 -52632 -21.3 -22.6 -2.9 12.0 -2.3 1COUNTY TABLE 3: 1980 COMPONENTS OF POPULATION 1990 CHANGE % CHNG, CHANGE FOR ARKANSAS COUNTIES. 1980 TO 1990 BIRTHS DEATHS NATURAL INCREASE % NATL. INC. NET MIGRATION % NET MIG. a a a a Arkansas Ashley Baxter Benton Boone Bradley Calhoun Carroll Chicot Clark Clay Cleburne Cleveland Columbia Conway Craighead Crawford Crittenden Cross Dallas Desha Drew Faulkner Franklin Fulton Garland Grant Greene Hempstead Hot Spring Howard Independence Izard Jackson Jefferson Johnson Lafayette Lawrence Lee Lincoln Little Ri ver Logan Lonoke Madison Marion Miller Mississippi Monroe Montgomery Nevada Newton Ouachita Perry Phillips Pike Poinsett Polk Pope Prairie Pulaski Randolph 24175 26538 27409 78115 26067 13803 6079 16203 17793 23326 20616 16909 7868 26644 19505 63239 36892 49499 20434 10515 19760 17910 46192 14705 9975 70531 13008 30744 23635 26819 13459 30147 10768 21646 90718 17423 10213 18447 15539 13369 13952 20144 34518 11373 11334 37766 59517 14052 7771 11097 7756 30541 7266 34772 10373 27032 17007 38964 10140 340597 16834 21653 24319 31186 97499 28297 11793 5826 18654 15713 21437 18107 19411 7781 25691 19151 68956 42493 49939 19225 9614 16798 17369 60006 14897 10037 73397 13948 31804 21621 26115 13569 31192 11364 18944 85487 18221 9643 17457 13053 13690 13966 20557 39268 11618 12001 38467 57525 11333 7841 10101 7666 30574 7969 28838 10086 24664 17347 45883 9518 349660 16558 -2522 -2219 3777 19384 2230 -2010 -253 2451 -2080 -1889 -2509 2502 -87 -953 -354 5717 5601 440 -1209 -901 -2962 -541 13814 192 62 2866 940 1060 -2014 -704 110 1045 596 -2702 -5231 798 -570 -990 -2486 321 14 413 4750 245 667 701 -1992 -2719 70 -996 -90 33 703 -5934 -287 -2368 340 6919 -622 9063 -276 -10.4 -8.4 13.8 24.8 8.6 -14.6 -4.2 15.1 -11.7 -8.1 -12.2 14.8 -1.1 -3.6 -1.8 9.0 15.2 0.9 -5.9 -8.6 -15.0 -3.0 29.9 1.3 0.6 4.1 7.2 3.4 -8.5 -2.6 0.8 3.5 5.5 -12.5 -5.8 4.6 -5.6 -5.4 -16.0 2.4 0.1 2.1 13.8 2.2 5.9 1.9 -3.3 -19.3 0.9 -9.0 -1.2 0.1 9.7 -17.1 -2.8 -8.8 2.0 17.8 -6.1 2.7 -1.6 3356 3791 2903 11865 3710 1719 715 2188 3059 2884 2240 1874 949 3916 2790 9160 6004 9595 3399 1522 3418 2624 7481 2036 1112 9158 1738 4053 3293 3494 2203 4330 1108 2629 14825 2438 1429 2499 2755 1795 1914 2860 5334 1698 1330 6159 12031 2209 863 1400 1082 5113 1055 6802 1366 3867 2365 6340 1290 61454 2107 2773 2617 4415 8497 2925 1793 706 1969 2034 2326 2638 2172 839 3065 2079 5630 3560 4629 2044 1389 2033 1636 3977 1635 1250 9553 1319 3185 2633 2860 1692 3094 1500 2416 8813 2136 1328 2229 1776 1205 1325 2408 3240 1291 1367 3962 5759 1749 990 1387 692 3771 865 4040 1182 2877 2092 3463 1079 29015 1842 583 1174 -1512 3368 785 -74 9 219 1025 558 -398 -298 110 851 711 3530 2444 4966 1355 133 1385 988 3504 401 -138 -395 419 868 660 634 511 1236 -392 213 6012 302 101 270 979 590 589 452 2094 407 -37 2197 6272 460 -127 13 390 1342 190 2762 184 990 273 2877 211 32439 265 2.4 4.4 -5.5 4.3 3.0 -0.5 0.1 1.4 5.8 2.4 -1.9 -1.8 1.4 3.2 3.6 5.6 6.6 10.0 6.6 1.3 7.0 5.5 7.6 2.7 -1.4 -0.6 3.2 2.8 2.8 2.4 3.8 4.1 -3.6 1.0 6.6 1.7 1.0 1.5 6.3 4.4 4.2 2.2 6.1 3.6 -0.3 5.8 10.5 3.3 -1.6 0.1 5.0 4.4 2.6 7.9 1.8 3.7 1.6 7.4 2.1 9.5 1.6 -3105 -3393 5289 16016 1445 -1936 -262 2232 -3105 -2447 -2111 2800 -197 -1804 -1065 2187 3157 -4526 -2564 -1034 -4347 -1529 10310 -209 200 3261 521 192 -2674 -1338 -401 -191 988 -2915 -11243 496 -671 -1260 -3465 -269 -575 -39 2656 -162 704 -1496 -8264 -3179 197 -1009 -480 -1309 513 -8696 -471 -3358 67 4042 -833 -23376 -541 -12.8 -12.8 19.3 20.5 5.5 -14.0 -4.3 13.8 -17.5 -10.5 -10.2 16.6 -2.5 -6.8 -5.5 3.5 8.6 -9.1 -12.5 -9.8 -22.0 -8.5 22.3 -1.4 2.0 4.6 4.0 0.6 -11.3 -5.0 -3.0 -0.6 9.2 -13.5 -12.4 2.8 -6.6 -6.8 -22.3 -2.0 -4.1 -0.2 7.7 -1.4 6.2 -4.0 -13.9 -22.6 2.5 -9.1 -6.2 -4.3 7.1 -25.0 -4.5 -12.4 0.4 10.4 -8.2 -6.9 -3.2 2COUNTY 1980 TABLE 3: 1990 COHPONEMTS OF CHANGE FOR COUNTIES (CONTINUED) CHANGE % CHNG. BIRTHS DEATHS NATURAL INCREASE % NATL. INC. NET MIGRATION % NET MIG. Saint Francis Saline Scott Searcy Sebastian Sevi er Sharp Stone Union Van Buren Washington White Woodruff Yell 30858 53156 9685 8847 95172 14060 14607 9022 48573 13357 100494 50835 11222 17026 28497 64183 .10205 7841 99590 13637 14109 9775 46719 14008 113409 54676 9520 17759 -2361 11027 520 -1006 4418 -423 -498 753 -1854 651 12915 3841 -1702 733 -7.7 20.7 5.4 -11.4 4.6 -3.0 -3.4 8.3 -3.8 4.9 12.9 7.6 -15.2 4.3 5802 7567 1239 980 15256 1842 1507 1128 7640 1393 16252 7452 1636 2324 3223 3997 1162 994 9124 1644 1951 1032 5740 1539 8332 5122 1430 2001 2579 3570 77 -14 6132 198 -444 96 1900 -146 7920 2330 206 323 8.4 6.7 0.8 -0.2 6.4 1.4 -3.0 1.1 3.9 -1.1 7.9 4.6 1.8 1.9 -4940 7457 443 -992 -1714 -621 -54 657 -3754 797 4995 1511 -1908 410 -16.0 14.0 4.6 -11.2 -1.8 -4.4 -0.4 7.3 -7.7 6.0 5.0 3.0 -17.0 2.4 State Totals 2286357 2350725 64368 2.8 352714 236057 116657 5.1 -52289 -2.3 I I 3MAP 1: POPULATION CHANGE AMONG ARKANSAS COUNTIES, 1980 1990 Bbenrt*a BOONE wARI maoism. ^V'lSrtARi NEWTON SEARCT RAND ) LAWR Percentage Change Loss of 10.0% or more 22g42**^ INpEj^ USS, 1^' ^RA^iK ioRN VAN.B
rjACK Lo9 5.0% to 9.9% LOGAS. COfWfJ ORO$S?' ?* /y. iW .f^k- HOW
SEvlEi lvrWw: Seu
Loss of less than 5.0S
V0Nro CAfi.LND. 2aH0T PIKE hEwp LAF? 'RAIR LEE MON! Gain of less than 5.0% '"" dEFP (HILLI^ clXf^
NEV 'COLOMB CALH I BRAD UNI<4 - UMC DREW Ashlk? DESHA. :hic( Gain of 5.0% to 9.9% Gain of 10.0% or more Division of Demogrophlc Research University of Arkonsos at Little Rock Ul MAP 2: NATURAL INCREASE AMONG ARKANSAS COUNTIES, 1980-1990 .. BefrtOf).
-7T.5 'N.ira ,4 VtASHS si BOONE BAX FULTON RANO CLW Percentage Increase B MAOISM I Cv.'^YZnEWTOM? .IZAto HARI ISHARI / '' ?Xw. Decrease of 5.0% or more JOHN I SEAF?CY STONE VAM0 TELL CLEB SCOTt': < PERRY ^ . Ijf^N POINSEn i Jwrrt ^CREENey inoSp< III? > MONl Oeoreaee of lees than 5.0% Increase of less than 5.0% .'.POLX MONTG pike
GARLND l^l .01^ HOT
SF^q 'CftANT' TonoI ilNC Increase of 5,0% to 9.9% LRI HOAP NE^' rULLERC-. j : NLLI^ I*' 'BRAD 'COLUMB UNION: Increase of 10.0% or more
Jdesha^ iff! ASHLET
hic( Division of Demographic Research University of Arkansas at Little Rock MAP 3: NET MIGRATION AMONG ARKANSAS COUNTIES, 1980-1990 VfASH tTi iaaiaA
' bOone Percentage Migration maricTO 10.0% or more out UADtSN CRAWU - X ^/RANK SE6 WIZARD qNOER \ X . CON^, NEWTOH SEARCT 36HN.:. LOCAN >EP X __ ^WHiE-WACK POINSm CROSS MISS, ''CRfP 5.0% to 9.9% out Less than 5.0% out vell ST FRAN SfcdTt: *l RULASKI RAIR LEE POLK-HONTC PIKE CARLND
1 MONI IHILUPS. HOT SPRi iCRANf JEFF ARKANSAS Less than 5.0% in SEVIEI L RIVER
HEMP XiLLERT ^LAF CLARK N^V/ ? CALLAS' OUACH CALH . rfcOLUMQ UNlOtX CLElJE BRADr UNO DESHA, DREW ASHLEY :hic( Division 5.0% to 9.9% in 10,0% or more in of Demographic Research University of Arkansos at Little Rock TABLE 4: AGE STRUCTURE OF ARKANSAS COUNTIES, 1980-1990 (PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTIONS) 1980 1990 COUNTY < 18 18-64 65+ TOTAL < 18 18-64 65+ TOTAL Arkansas Ashley Baxter Benton Boone Bradley Calhoun Carroll Chicot Clark Clay Cleburne Cleveland Columbia Conway Craighead Crawford Crittenden Cross Dallas Desha Drew Faulkner Franklin Fulton Garland Grant Greene Hempstead Hot Spring Howard Independence Izard Jackson Jefferson Johnson Lafayette Lawrence Lee Lincoln Little River Logan Lonoke Kadi son Marion Miller Mississippi Monroe Montgomery Nevada Newton Ouachita Perry Phillips Pike Poinsett Polk Pope Prairie 28.6 32.6 21.8 27.3 27.0 28.3 27.9 24.8 35.2 24.9 27.1 25.8 29.8 28.0 30.7 27.6 31.6 36.2 34.4 29.3 34.5 30.0 27.6 29.1 26.3 24.6 30.0 28.7 29.5 28.9 29.3 28.6 23.0 29.6 31.2 27.7 31.7 27.8 36.7 28.6 32.8 29.7 33.0 28.5 26.6 31.1 33.7 32.7 25.5 29.5 30.4 28.3 30.8 36.4 28.2 31.1 28.5 28.8 29.8 57.2 54.5 50.8 56.7 56.3 53.2 55.3 56.3 49.3 60.7 54.4 56.2 54.1 56.1 54.8 61.5 56.6 54.1 53.1 53.6 51.7 56.6 61.8 54.9 54.2 55.9 57.1 57.1 53.5 56.9 53.1 57.4 52.3 55.6 56.6 55.0 50.6 55.4 48.6 57.9 54.0 53.2 55.4 55.9 54.0 55.5 55.3 51.3 55.7 52.1 56.3 55.6 54.7 49.8 55.3 56.1 53.2 59.4 55.4 14.2 12.8 27.3 16.0 16.7 18.4 16.8 18.9 15.4 14.4 18.5 17.9 16.1 15.9 14.4 10.9 11.9 9.7 12.5 17.1 13.7 13.4 10.6 16.0 19.4 19.5 12.9 14.2 17.0 14.2 17.6 14.0 24.7 14.8 12.2 17.3 17.7 16.8 14.7 13.5 13.2 17.0 11.6 15.6 19.5 13.4 11.0 16.0 18.8 18.4 13.3 16.1 14.5 13.8 16.6 12.8 18.3 11.8 14.8 24175 26538 27409 78115 26067 13803 6079 16203 17793 23326 20616 16909 7868 26644 19505 63239 36892 49499 20434 10515 19760 17910 46192 14705 9975 70531 13008 30744 23635 26819 13459 30147 10768 21646 90718 17423 10213 18447 15539 13369 13952 20144 34518 11373 11334 37766 59517 14052 7771 11097 7756 30541 7266 34772 10373 27032 17007 39021 10140 27.4 28.2 19.5 24.8 24.8 25.8 26.9 24.2 32.4 22.3 23.0 21.7 26.3 26.2 27.2 24.7 29.0 31.9 30.3 26.6 31.7 27.8 25.6 26.3 23.6 21.5 26.8 25.2 27.7 25.9 27.6 26.3 21.5 25.7 28.3 24.7 27.7 24.6 33.6 23.3 28.1 27.0 29.5 26.8 22.0 28.4 31.3 29.5 23.1 27.1 28.0 27.0 25.3 34.2 26.1 26.7 25.7 26.3 25.9 55.8 57.3 51.3 57.3 58.0 55.3 56.6 57.6 51.5 61.0 56.3 57.4 58.8 57.0 56.4 63.2 59.0 57.5 55.8 55.2 53.5 58.7 63.7 57.0 55.3 56.3 60.4 59.3 55.7 57.5 55.1 59.0 52.6 56.6 58.3 57.9 54.6 56.7 50.7 64.7 57.8 56.0 58.9 56.8 55.3 57.6 57.0 52.6 57.0 54.6 57.0 56.5 58.4 50.7 55.6 58.0 55.0 61.3 57.5 16.7 14.6 29.2 17.9 17.2 18.9 16.5 18.2 16.2 16.7 20.7 20.9 14.9 16.8 16.4 12.1 12.0 10.6 13.9 18.3 14.8 13.5 10.7 16.8 21.2 22.1 12.8 15.5 16.7 16.6 17.2 14.7 25.9 17.7 13.5 17.4 17.7 18.7 15.7 12.1 14.1 17.0 11.6 16.4 22.8 14.0 11.7 18.0 19.9 18.3 15.1 16.5 16.2 15.1 18.3 15.3 19.3 12.4 16.6 21653 24319 31186 97499 28297 11793 5826 18654 15713 21437 18107 19411 7781 25691 19151 68956 42493 49939 19225 9614 16798 17369 60006 14897 10037 73397 13948 31804 21621 26115 13569 31192 11364 18944 85487 18221 9643 17457 13053 13690 13966 20557 39268 11618 12001 38467 57525 11333 7841 10101 7666 30574 7969 28838 10086 24664 17347 45883 9518 7COUNTY Pulaski Randolph Saint Francis Saline Scott Searcy Sebastian Sevier Sharp Stone Union Van Buren Washington White Woodruff Yell State Totals TABLE 4: < 18 29.4 29.7 36.5 31.0 28.3 27.7 28.6 29.7 25.2 28.1 28.6 26.7 25.7 28.3 32.2 27.6 29.4 AGE STRUCTURE OF CtXJHTIES (CONTINUED) 1980 1990 18-64 60.9 55.1 51.5 59.9 55.0 55.3 58.8 54.8 52.1 56.5 55.7 55.5 63.6 58.2 51.3 55.6 57.0 65+ 9.8 15.3 12.0 9.1 16.7 17.0 12.7 15.5 22.7 15.4 15.7 17.8 10.7 13.5 16.4 16.8 TOTAL < 18 18-64 65+ TOTAL 340613 16834 30858 53161 9685 8847 95172 14060 14607 9022 48573 13357 100494 50835 11222 17026 26.2 25.7 33.0 27.3 25.5 24.3 26.1 26.1 21.7 24.2 27.4 22.4 24.7 25.1 28.8 25.7 62.3 57.1 53.6 61.6 57.7 55.8 59.9 57.4 51.2 58.3 55.9 53.9 64.0 60.3 53.5 57.9 11.5 17.2 13.4 11.1 16.8 19.8 14.0 16.4 27.2 17.4 16.6 23.7 11.3 14.7 17.7 16.4 349660 16558 28497 64183 10205 7841 99590 13637 14109 9775 46719 14008 113409 54676 9520 17759 13.7 2286435 26.4 58.7 14.9 2350725 I 8MAP 4: PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE, 1990 kD .SEB. 7 _
C^ROLL BOONE / SCOTT Mk: >>SEVil SiEWTON
i^OHN MARION Searcy Pdl^' BAX FULTOI^Y IZARD STONE VAN B CLEB dAY Percentage SHARlf7'^'P-=--t4?^ SHARI Less than 22.49% 22.50% to 24.99% CbNW:/-\- ': JF'aUlk: PULASK] MONTG GARLND SAONE- HOT-swer^ftWif <8^ 5! ' 25.00% to 27.49% BdnoI !AlR Sil !NR 11^ lEfB
arkansaS 27.50% to 29.99% & w PIKE CLARK .NEV 30.00% or more DALLAS bUACH' CALH COLUMB UNibH' OJE^ brad LING MS .DREW, Division of Demogrophlc Research University of Arkansas at Little Rock o MAP 5: PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION 65 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER, 1990 iBENTON' :f?F' WASH RA.M< I CRAW SEB boo,se: 'J/ T TiEWTOM SEWCT Ji s JOHN- -I SCOTT SEMI POPE "I wSMONTG, HOW kiark:- L RIVER .HEliP. MILLER -n irrir^'.?r?> Percentage ifep INOEFx, wiSir' l-Wte FAULK PULASKI SALINE ^HbT
S^ grant LONO J 1th 'OUACH J^afOOLUMO ,UAO J^F CALH DR^ . aSk' 'UNION :AFYA>iS'^ LING oes.haJ ASHLEYv a^fcoj^ &CRAIGHEAD POINSETT^ CROb STFFlAH LEE HILLIPS MISS, CRIT Less than 12.50% 12.50% to 8 14.99% 15.00% to 17.49% 17.50% to 19.99% 20,00% or more Division of Demographic Research Univeraity of Arkansas at Little Rock TABLE 5: GENDER COMPOSITION OF ARKANSAS COUNTIES, 1980-1990 1980 1990 FEMALES PER 100 MALES COUNTY MALES FEMALES MALES FEMALES 1980 1990 Arkansas Ashley Baxter Benton Boone Bradley Calhoun Carroll Chicot Clark Clay Cleburne Cleveland Columbia Conway Craighead Crawford Crittenden Cross Dallas Desha Drew Faulkner Franklin Fulton Garland Grant Greene Hempstead Hot Spring Howard Independence Izard Jackson Jefferson Johnson Lafayette Lawrence Lee Lincoln Little River Logan Lonoke Madison Marion 11709 12813 13162 38019 12470 6523 2943 7813 8342 11224 9885 8307 3842 12657 9428 30498 18159 23597 9905 5044 9330 8700 22340 7324 4856 33656 6415 14865 11288 13002 6426 14641 5244 10422 43951 8526 4872 8857 7314 7299 6738 9958 16826 5662 5516 12466 13725 14247 40096 13597 7280 3136 8390 9451 12102 10731 8602 4026 13987 10077 32741 18733 25902 10529 5471 10430 9210 23852 7381 5119 36875 6593 15879 12347 13817 7033 15506 5524 11224 46767 8897 5341 9590 8225 6070 7214 10186 17692 5711 5818 10230 11674 14846 47531 13540 5604 2816 9015 7222 10163 8652 9406 3783 12043 9179 33169 20775 23566 9222 4602 7837 8350 29016 7392 4802 34943 6860 15380 10272 12620 6513 15171 5460 9044 41107 8876 4600 8375 6155 8055 6775 10128 19297 5700 5843 11423 12645 16340 49968 14757 6189 3010 9639 8491 11274 9455 10005 3998 13648 9972 35787 21718 26373 10003 5012 8961 9019 30990 7505 5235 38454 7088 16424 11349 13495 7056 16021 5904 9900 44380 9345 5043 9082 6898 5635 7191 10429 19971 5918 6158 106.5 107.1 108.2 105.5 109.0 111.6 106.6 107.4 113.3 107.8 108.6 103.6 104.8 110.5 106.9 107.4 103.2 109.8 106.3 108.5 111.8 105.9 106.8 100.8 105.4 109.6 102.8 106.8 109.4 106.3 109.4 105.9 105.3 107.7 106.4 104.4 109.6 108.3 112.5 83.2 107.1 102.3 105.1 100.9 105.5 111.7 108.3 110.1 105.1 109.0 110.4 106.9 106.9 117.6 110.9 109.3 106.4 105.7 113.3 108.6 107.9 104.5 111.9 108.5 108.9 114.3 108.0 106.8 101.5 109.0 110.0 103.3 106.8 110.5 106.9 108.3 105.6 108.1 109.5 108.0 105.3 109.6 108.4 112.1 70.0 106.1 103.0 103.5 103.8 105.4 11I TABLE 5: GENDER COMPOSITION OF COUNTIES (CONTINUED) 1980 1990 FEMALES PER 100 MALES I COUNTY MALES FEMALES MALES FEMALES 1980 1990 Miller Mississippi Monroe Montgomery Nevada Newton Ouachita Perry Phillips Pike Poinsett Polk Pope Prairie Pulaski Randolph Saint Francis Saline Scott Searcy Sebastian Sevier Sharp Stone Union Van Buren Washington White Woodruff Yell 18030 28704 6699 3854 5352 3891 14386 3587 16186 5037 13059 8286 19177 5016 162475 8162 14610 26475 4803 4337 45557 6833 7134 4443 22927 6585 50322 24727 5382 8284 19736 30813 7353 3917 5745 3865 16155 3679 18586 5336 13973 8721 19844 5124 178138 8672 16248 26686 4882 4510 49615 7227 7473 4579 25646 6772 50172 26108 5840 8742 18372 27793 5317 3868 4826 3843 14419 3919 13188 4915 11872 8446 22665 4670 166481 8000 13233 31718 5013 3829 48144 6737 6708 4778 22101 6899 56060 26539 4473 8641 20095 29732 6016 3973 5275 3823 16155 4050 15650 5171 12792 8901 23218 4848 183179 8558 15264 32465 5192 4012 51446 6900 7401 4997 24618 7109 57349 28137 5047 9118 109.5 107.3 109.8 101.6 107.3 99.3 112.3 102.6 114.8 105.9 107.0 105.2 103.5 102.2 109.6 106.2 111.2 100.8 101.6 104.0 108.9 105.8 104.8 103.1 111.9 102.8 99.7 105.6 108.5 105.5 109.4 107.0 113.1 102.7 109.3 99.5 112.0 103.3 118.7 105.2 107.7 105.4 102.4 103.8 110.0 107.0 115.3 102.4 103.6 104.8 106.9 102.4 110.3 104.6 111.4 103.0 102.3 106.0 112.8 105.5 State Totals 1104688 1181747 1133076 1217649 107.0 107.5 12H W MAP 6: SEX RATIO OF ARKANSAS COUNTIES, CRAW SEB< WADISH 1990 Females per 100 Males Less than 100.0 NEWTON i&ARC? RANK :pope- LOGAbf YELL .gcotr. STONE. VAN B
WCO MW Cl te 1 T? 100.0 to 104.9 :
l?WfAUU ( ^': WR 31 h'. FdEEgSI PlKEii LINC HOW CFlANt- POLK> k^si 1^'11 110.0 or more 105.0 to 109.9 DMsfon of Demogrophlc Research Univereity of Arkansas at Little Rock TABLE 6: RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS, 1980-1990 I A: ABSOLUTE NUMBERS WHITE BLACK INDIAN AS IAN OTHER TOTAL 1980 1990 1890322 1944744 373768 373912 9428 12773 6740 12530 6177 6766 2286435 2350725 B: PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTIONS WHITE BLACK INDIAN ASIAN OTHER TOTAL 1980 1990 82.7 82.7 16.3 15.9 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.3 100.0 100.0 C: PERCENTAGE CHANGE, 1980-1990 I WHITE BLACK INDIAN ASIAN OTHER TOTAL I 1980-1990 2.9 0.0 35.5 85.9 9.5 2.8 H 14I TABLE 7: THE BLACK POPULATION OF ARKANSAS COUNTIES, 1980-1990 1980 1990 COUNTY BLACK TOTAL %BLACK BLACK TOTAL %BLACK I Arkansas Ashley Baxter Benton Boone Bradley Calhoun Carroll Chicot Clark Clay Cleburne Cleveland Columbia Conway Craighead Crawford Crittenden Cross Dallas Desha Drew Faulkner Franklin Fulton Garland Grant Greene Hempstead Hot Spring Howard Independence Izard Jackson Jefferson Johnson Lafayette Lawrence Lee Lincoln Little River Logan Lonoke Madison Marion Miller 4805 7237 26 50 2 4022 1706 4 9414 5079 3 4 1194 9242 2974 2876 460 21207 5068 3957 8444 4886 3700 154 1 5756 420 5 7062 3014 2486 551 3 2887 36825 273 4189 84 8520 4794 3470 307 4218 0 2 9136 24175 26538 27409 78115 26067 13803 6079 16203 17793 23326 20616 16909 7868 26644 19505 63239 36892 49499 20434 10515 19760 17910 46192 14705 9975 70531 13008 30744 23635 26819 13459 30147 10768 21646 90718 17423 10213 18447 15539 13369 13952 20144 34518 11373 11334 37766 19.9 27.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 29.1 28.1 0.0 52.9 21.8 0.0 0.0 15.2 34.7 15.2 4.5 1.2 42.8 24.8 37.6 42.7 27.3 8.0 1.0 0.0 8.2 3.2 0.0 29.9 11.2 18.5 1.8 0.0 13.3 40.6 1.6 41.0 0.5 54.8 35.9 24.9 1.5 12.2 0.0 0.0 24.2 4738 6616 4 124 5 3648 1447 6 8859 4913 6 6 1059 8992 2876 3778 374 21401 4782 3698 7139 4754 4778 99 10 5604 377 20 6464 2865 2919 595 11 2759 36877 309 3711 88 7487 4935 2931 273 3536 3 6 8625 21653 24319 31186 97499 28297 11793 5826 18654 15713 21437 18107 19411 7781 25691 19151 68956 42493 49939 19225 9614 16798 17369 60006 14897 10037 73397 13948 31804 21621 26115 13569 31192 11364 18944 85487 18221 9643 17457 13053 13690 13966 20557 39268 11618 12001 38467 21.9 27.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 30.9 24.8 0.0 56.4 22.9 0.0 0.0 13.6 35.0 15.0 5.5 0.9 42.9 24.9 38.5 42.5 27.4 8.0 0.7 0.1 7.6 2.7 0.1 29.9 11.0 21.5 1.9 0.1 14.6 43.1 1.7 38.5 0.5 57.4 36.0 21.0 1.3 9.0 0.0 0.0 22.4 15TABLE 7: BLACK POPULATION OF COUNTIES (CONTINUED) 1980 1990 I COUNTY BLACK TOTAL %BLACK BLACK TOTAL %BLACK I I I Mississippi Monroe Montgomery Nevada Newton Ouachita Perry Phillips Pike Poinsett Polk Pope Prairie Pulaski Randolph Saint Francis Saline Scott Searcy Sebastian Sevier Sharp Stone Union Van Buren Washington White Woodruff Yell 16164 5738 11 3398 5 11002 133 18410 414 1868 2 836 1417 81407 155 14190 1458 2 0 4916 783 100 7 13970 51 1475 1497 3490 352 59517 14052 7771 11097 7756 30541 7266 34772 10373 27032 17007 39021 10140 340613 16834 30858 53161 9685 8847 95172 14060 14607 9022 48573 13357 100494 50835 11222 17026 27.2 40.8 0.1 30.6 0.1 36.0 1.8 52.9 4.0 6.9 0.0 2.1 14.0 23.9 0.9 46.0 2.7 0.0 0.0 5.2 5.6 0.7 0.1 28.8 0.4 1.5 2.9 31.1 2.1 16006 4422 8 3196 0 10739 119 15753 378 1773 0 1129 1294 92200 146 13521 1348 1 2 5666 787 66 8 14061 41 1676 1703 2991 371 57525 11333 7841 10101 7666 30574 7969 28838 10086 24664 17347 45883 9518 349660 16558 28497 64183 10205 7841 99590 13637 14109 9775 46719 14008 113409 54676 9520 17759 27.8 39.0 0.1 31.6 0.0 35.1 1.5 54.6 3.7 7.2 0.0 2.5 13.6 26.4 0.9 47.4 2.1 0.0 0.0 5.7 5.8 0.5 0.1 30.1 0.3 1.5 3.1 31.4 2.1 State Totals 373768 2286435 16.3 373912 2350725 15.9 16MAP 7: THE BLACK POPULATION OF ARKANSAS COUNTIES, 1990 (Source: Division of Demogrophlc Research, UALR) H 7 BENTON WASH CRAW RANK iRROLL BOONE T MAFaOl B'OC FULTON Percentage Black Less than 1.0% NEWTON SEARCY MJSS, SEB JOHN f X. r POPE LOGAN SCOK POLK HOW.. SEMERi. LRNER. MONTG PIKE /ilLLER J VAN B MACK' ->oiNskrt\ < - CONW, y^ERpt' garlnd AULK WHITE totJ ICRpSS.Lij L-ipiAASKI. LONO ,SAUI HR WON! HOT SPRG GRANT 'ARkANyLS
CLARK. CLD/E 'viKe: DESI iiFi?b COLUMS UNiOti. HE 1,0% to 9.9% 10.0% to 19.9% 20.0% to 29.9% 30.0% to 39.9% ASHiXy 40.0% to 49.9% Sisl-'Kllifo 50.0% or more I TABLE 8: BASIC DATA ON LIVING ARRANGEMENTS FOR ARKANSAS COUNTIES, 1980-1990 1980 1990 COUNTY POP HHPOP % IN GQ HK HHSIZE POP HHPOP % IN GQ HH HHSIZE I I I fl Arkansas Ashley Baxter Benton Boone Bradley Calhoun Carroll Chicot Clark Clay Cleburne Cleveland Columbia Conway Craighead Crawford Crittenden Cross Dallas Desha Drew Faulkner Franklin Fulton Garland Grant Greene Hempstead Hot Spring Howard Independence Izard Jackson Jefferson Johnson Lafayette Lawrence Lee Lincoln Little River Logan Lonoke Madison Marion Miller Mississippi Monroe Montgomery Mevada Newton Ouachita Perry Phillips Pike Poinsett Polk Pope Prairie Pulaski 24175 26538 27409 78115 26067 13803 6079 16203 17793 23326 20616 16909 7868 26644 19505 63239 36892 49499 20434 10515 19760 17910 46192 14705 9975 70531 13008 30744 23635 26819 13459 30147 10768 21646 90718 17423 10213 18447 15539 13369 13952 20144 34518 11373 11334 37766 59517 14052 7771 11097 7756 30541 7266 34772 10373 27032 17007 39021 10140 340613 23902 26268 27151 76736 25681 13582 5846 16140 17712 21031 20395 16803 7802 25674 19236 60342 36456 49227 20171 10329 19567 17221 42767 14170 9846 68980 12903 30431 23442 26588 13164 29692 10603 21401 87908 17011 10109 18085 15389 11619 13822 19391 33980 11307 11262 37387 58337 13946 7710 10918 7725 30194 7232 34472 10241 26880 16838 37582 10140 333646 1.1 1.0 0.9 1.8 1.5 1.6 3.8 0.4 0.5 9.8 1.1 0.6 0.8 3.6 1.4 4.6 1.2 0.5 1.3 1.8 1.0 3.8 7.4 3.6 1.3 2.2 0.8 1.0 0.8 0.9 2.2 1.5 1.5 1.1 3.1 2.4 1.0 2.0 1.0 13.1 0.9 3.7 1.6 0.6 0.6 1.0 2.0 0.8 0.8 1.6 0.4 1.1 0.5 0.9 1.3 0.6 1.0 3.7 0.0 2.0 8909 9061 11181 28622 9781 5040 2121 6431 5993 8134 7911 6405 2769 9535 6800 22334 12566 15701 6631 3735 6640 6200 15489 5164 3765 28171 4504 11228 8578 9683 4818 10901 4284 7786 30588 6395 3587 6797 4942 3918 4735 7059 11408 4094 4311 13476 19757 4920 2922 3980 2718 11198 2564 11434 3839 9465 6318 13615 3658 124516 2.68 2.90 2.43 2.68 2.63 2.69 2.76 2.51 2.96 2.59 2.58 2.62 2.82 2.69 2.83 2.70 2.90 3.14 3.04 2.77 2.95 2.78 2.76 2.74 2.62 2.45 2.86 2.71 2.73 2.75 2.73 2.72 2.48 2.75 2.87 2.66 2.82 2.66 3.11 2.97 2.92 2.75 2.98 2.76 2.61 2.77 2.95 2.83 2.64 2.74 2.84 2.70 2.82 3.01 2.67 2.84 2.67 2.76 2.77 2.68 21653 24319 31186 97499 . 28297 11793 5826 18654 15713 21437 18107 19411 7781 25691 19151 68956 42493 49939 19225 9614 16798 17369 60006 14897 10037 73397 13948 31804 21621 26115 13569 31192 11364 18944 85487 18221 9643 17457 13053 13690 13966 20557 39268 11618 12001 38467 57525 11333 7841 10101 7666 30574 7969 28838 10086 24664 17347 45883 9518 349660 21285 24020 30756 95908 27868 11529 5737 18490 15607 19145 17894 19108 7710 24738 18778 66393 41950 49438 18946 9407 16584 16677 56505 14417 9902 71593 13838 31347 21216 25760 13165 30559 11111 18686 81111 17668 9534 17045 12903 10481 13812 19865 38771 11546 11904 37727 56382 11204 7542 9884 7618 30140 7882 28470 9913 24401 17160 43989 9429 342290 1.7 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.5 2.2 1.5 0.9 0.7 10.7 1.2 1.6 0.9 3.7 1.9 3.7 1.3 1.0 1.5 2.2 1.3 4.0 5.8 3.2 1.3 2.5 0.8 1.4 1.9 1.4 3.0 2.0 2.2 1.4 5.1 3.0 1.1 2.4 1.1 23.4 1.1 3.4 1.3 0.6 0.8 1.9 2.0 1.1 3.8 2.1 0.6 1.4 1.1 1.3 1.7 1.1 1.1 4.1 0.9 2.1 8389 8890 13486 37555 11131 4545 2185 7550 5557 7907 7504 7926 2868 9638 7179 26285 15251 17120 6754 3600 5957 6342 21325 5578 4010 30836 5118 12325 8212 10115 4975 11846 4684 7361 30001 7059 3584 6857 4578 3796 5150 7628 13866 4392 4970 14273 20420 4361 3062 3798 2818 11712 3055 10183 3855 9368 6827 16828 3661 137209 2.54 2.70 2.28 2.55 2.50 2.54 2.63 2.45 2.81 2.42 2.38 2.41 2.69 2.57 2.62 2.53 2.75 2.89 2.81 2.61 2.78 2.63 2.65 2.58 2.47 2.32 2.70 2.54 2.58 2.55 2.65 2.58 2.37 2.54 2.70 2.50 2.66 2.49 2.82 2.76 2.68 2.60 2.80 2.63 2.40 2.64 2.76 2.57 2.46 2.60 2.70 2.57 2.58 2.80 2.57 2.60 2.51 2.61 2.58 2.49 18I TABLE 8: BASIC DATA OM LIVIMG ARRANGEREMTS (COMTINUED) 1980 1990 COUNTY POP HHPOP X IN GQ HH HHSI2E POP HHPOP % IN GQ HH HHSI2E I I Randolph Saint Francis Saline Scott Searcy Sebastian Sevier Sharp Stone Union Van Buren Washington White Woodruff Yell 16834 30858 53161 9685 8847 95172 14060 14607 9022 48573 13357 100494 50835 11222 17026 16743 30653 51511 9611 8782 93700 13910 14540 8968 47964 13317 94815 48104 11141 16772 0.5 0.7 3.1 0.8 0.7 1.5 1.1 0.5 0.6 1.3 0.3 5.7 5.4 0.7 1.5 6079 9930 17572 3534 3257 35803 5057 5642 3280 18080 5018 36072 17423 4014 6219 2.75 3.09 2.93 2.72 2.70 2.62 2.75 2.58 2.73 2.65 2.65 2.63 2.76 2.78 2.70 16558 28497 64183 10205 7841 99590 13637 14109 9775 46719 14008 113409 54676 9520 17759 16349 28153 62921 10074 7764 97979 13400 13883 9662 45874 13873 109124 51606 9392 17601 1.3 1.2 2.0 1.3 1.0 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.2 1.8 1.0 3.8 5.6 1.3 0.9 6445 9958 23037 3957 3117 39298 5118 5819 3866 17819 5698 43372 19823 3630 6907 2.54 2.83 2.73 2.55 2.49 2.49 2.62 2.39 2.50 2.57 2.43 2.52 2.60 2.59 2.55 I State Totals 2286435 2234921 2.3 816065 2.74 2350725 2292393 2.5 891179 2.57 I fl 19w o MAP 8
PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION IN GROUP QUARTERS, 1990 7 Percentoge BENTON CARROLL wash MADISN CRAW SEB SCOTT POLK I, HOW SEVIEI L RIVER FULTON BOONE T MARION BAX IZARD SHARP Less than 2,5% NEWTON SEARCY STONE INDEP JOHN LOCAN J YELL montO-PIKE HEMP MILLER LAF? VAN B >OIPE-CONW PERRY CLEB JACK PULASKI GARLND SsAUNE HOT SPRG grant B ^CLA NEV DALLAS OUACH CALH LCOLUMB UNION TC.E LONO CLEVE BRAD WOOD RAIR MONR ARKANSAS DESHA blof ASHLEY CHIiico
TcAiCri^6 poiNsen CROSS ST FRAN LEE 'HILLIPS MISS, CRIT s 2.5% to 4-,9% j. 5.0% to 9.9% 10.0% or more Division of Demogrophlc Research Univereity of Arkansas ot Little Rock BENTON CARROLL WASH i, H M CRAVr RANK SEB MAP 9: AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD SIZE, 1990 TT Bodtie T MARION . /iNkEICWUrnOTMNJ s5 SEARCY T FULTON J\ j ClAV S -Ei& A1 V ' l lgs Persons per household Less than 2,50 JOHN POPE-STONE INDEP VAN B CLEB CDNW:. faUlk: YELL PERRY SCOTT 7'. POLK i,-wwj SEMI L-RIVER MONTG GARLND PIKE HEMP JACK CRAIGHEAD
Amiss^ PULASKI I VSADNEfe , j|ir A*ag i lOO PRAIR : -POINSE^ J iirf-T 2.50 to 2.59
A iii 2.60 to 2.69 ^s8 K4CNR 2.70 to 2.79 SPRG fcRANT? W CLARK DALLAS CLEVe OUACH J <.,
1 - V a.cach'1 'xx x\k:xXx>
JsRAD
NEVje fASHLEY# ARKANSAS DREW .<7 deshaL 3 2.80 or more Division of Demographic Research Univerelty of Arkansas at Little Rock I TABLE 9: HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE OF HOUSEHOLD FOR ARKANSAS COUNTIES, 1980-1990 (PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTIONS) I 1980 1990 FAMILY NONFAMILY FAMILY NONFAMILY COUNTY HARRIED COUPLE HALE FEHALE MALE FEHALE HEAD HEAD HEAD HEAD TOTAL HARRIED COUPLE HALE HEAD FEHALE HEAD HALE HEAD FEHALE HEAD TOTAL I Arkansas Ashley Baxter Benton Boone Bradley Calhoun Carroll Chicot Clark Clay Cleburne Cleveland Colutbia Conway Craighead Crawford Crittenden Cross Dallas Desha Drew Faulkner Franklin Fulton Garland Grant Greene Henpstead Hot Spring Howard Independence Izard Jackson Jefferson Johnson Lafayette Lawrence Lee Lincoln Little River Logan Lonoke Madison Marion Hiller Mississippi Monroe Montgomery Nevada Newton Ouachita Perry Phillips Pike 64.7 66.0 72.9 72.9 69.1 64.0 65.1 67.0 53.1 62.8 67.2 73.9 70.2 60.5 68.1 66.0 73.0 59.7 66.9 63.2 57.8 63.6 67.1 69.9 71.3 60.8 74.3 69.6 63.6 69.7 66.8 70.0 72.2 64.5 60.1 68.7 59.1 68.4 57.4 64.6 67.4 68.6 71.7 74.2 72.7 61.6 62.7 57.6 72.8 64.2 73.9 62.2 71.8 54.3 70.0 2.9 2.4 1.3 1.7 1.7 2.6 2.0 1.9 3.6 2.2 1.9 1.9 2.9 2.5 2.0 2.1 2.0 3.4 2.5 2.4 3.1 2.5 1.8 2.2 1.6 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.4 2.1 1.9 2.1 1.7 2.5 2.8 2.0 3.0 1.9 2.8 2.8 2.5 2.1 2.1 2.2 1.7 2.6 2.9 2.7 2.3 2.8 2.5 1.9 2.0 3.3 1.9 9.0 10.3 5.4 6.0 6.9 9.8 10.4 6.8 17.3 8.4 7.3 5.6 6.2 11.4 9.2 8.7 7.9 15.7 10.2 9.8 13.7 10.6 7.3 7.5 6.3 8.7 6.0 7.7 10.0 7.6 8.7 7.4 4.9 10.0 13.3 7.1 11.0 8.0 16.5 10.9 9.2 7.2 8.0 4.9 6.2 12.2 12.7 13.1 5.7 9.6 5.4 11.1 6.4 17.3 6.2 8.9 7.6 6.5 7.0 7.2 7.1 7.9 8.2 8.7 9.5 7.0 6.9 6.5 8.7 6.9 8.5 6.2 8.8 7.3 8.7 10.2 8.9 9.1 7.4 7.4 11.2 5.9 6.9 8.7 6.8 6.2 7.3 7.0 8.0 9.9 7.7 10.1 6.5 8.5 8.1 7.9 7.2 6.4 6.7 7.5 8.2 8.0 9.7 7.0 8.5 7.4 8.4 7.6 9.5 8.3 14.4 13.8 13.9 12.5 15.1 16.6 14.7 16.1 17.4 17.1 16.5 11.7 14.3 17.0 13.8 14.7 10.9 12.4 13.0 15.9 15.3 14.4 14.5 13.0 13.4 17.4 11.9 13.8 15.3 13.8 16.4 13.2 14.2 14.9 13.9 14.5 16.8 15.1 14.9 13.7 13.0 14.9 11.8 12.0 11.9 15.3 13.7 16.9 12.3 14.8 10.9 16.3 12.3 15.6 13.6 8909 9061 11181 28622 9781 5040 2121 6431 5993 8134 7911 6405 2769 9535 6800 22334 12566 15701 6631 3735 6640 6200 15489 5164 3765 28171 4504 11228 8578 9683 4818 10901 4284 7786 30588 6395 3587 6797 4942 3918 4735 7059 11408 4094 4311 13476 19757 4920 2922 3980 2718 11198 2564 11434 3839 56.9 61.7 65.4 67.9 64.2 57.0 60.9 61.0 45.8 55.7 61.4 67.2 66.7 54.4 60.8 58.7 67.6 53.1 61.2 57.4 52.8 57.4 62.1 65.3 65.8 57.5 69.1 64.7 56.6 62.6 60.6 64.0 65.4 57.8 54.0 61.3 55.1 61.9 49.0 58.2 61.4 63.6 67.2 68.2 65.4 55.7 56.7 50.9 65.3 57.7 68.5 56.4 64.7 46.3 66.9 3.1 3.1 2.0 2.4 2.2 3.1 2.5 2.6 3.7 2.4 2.6 2.1 2.9 3.0 3.0 2.6 2.7 4.0 3.6 3.9 3.4 3.1 2.5 2.9 2.5 2.4 3.1 2.6 3.1 2.9 3.0 2.9 2.1 3.0 3.3 2.9 3.2 2.3 3.5 3.0 3.5 2.7 3.0 2.8 2.6 3.3 3.3 3.0 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.8 3.0 3.1 2.5 12.1 11.9 6.1 6.9 7.9 13.3 10.5 8.4 21.7 11.2 7.7 6.7 9.5 13.8 10.9 10.5 9.9 18.7 12.8 11.6 17.5 13.6 9.3 8.0 7.0 9.5 7.2 8.5 13.4 10.0 11.5 8.2 6.9 12.2 16.0 8.6 13.9 9.3 20.1 14.0 11.5 8.6 9.4 6.2 6.8 14.9 15.3 15.8 6.9 12.3 6.1 13.0 6.9 22.1 6.8 11.1 9.4 9.4 9.1 9.2 9.4 11.2 10.9 10.3 11.7 9.8 9.0 8.4 10.7 10.0 11.6 8.0 10.6 8.0 10.7 10.0 10.4 11.1 9.2 8.8 12.0 8.2 9.3 10.4 9.1 9.0 9.6 9.0 10.2 11.1 10.9 10.8 8.8 11.0 9.8 9.8 9.4 8.4 9.2 10.5 10.1 10.4 10.9 10.3 10.6 9.1 10.6 11.4 10.9 9.1 16.8 13.9 17.1 13.6 16.4 17.3 14.9 17.1 18.5 19.1 18.5 14.9 12.6 18.2 15.4 16.6 11.8 13.6 14.4 16.4 16.4 15.5 15.0 14.6 15.9 18.6 12.4 15.0 16.5 15.4 15.9 15.3 16.6 16.8 15.7 16.3 17.0 17.7 16.4 15.1 13.9 15.6 12.0 13.6 14.8 15.9 14.4 19.4 14.7 16.7 13.4 17.2 13.9 17.7 14.7 8389 8890 13486 37555 11131 4545 2185 7550 5557 7907 7504 7926 2868 9638 7179 26285 15251 17120 6754 3600 5957 6342 21325 5578 4010 30836 5118 12325 8212 10115 4975 11846 4684 7361 30001 7059 3584 6857 4578 3796 5150 7628 13866 4392 4970 14273 20420 4361 3062 3798 2818 11712 3055 10183 3855 22TABLE 9
HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE FOR COUMTIES (CONTINUED) 1980 1990 I FAMILY NONFAMILY FAMILY NONFAMILY I COUNTY MARRIED COUPLE MALE HEAD FEMALE HEAD MALE HEAD FEMALE HEAD MARRIED TOTAL COUPLE MALE HEAD FEMALE HEAD MALE HEAD FEMALE HEAD TOTAL I I Poinsett Polk Pope Prairie Pulaski Randolph Saint Francis Saline Scott Searcy Sebastian Sevier Sharp Stone Union Van Buren Uashington White Woodruff Yell 67.0 68.9 69.1 68.0 57.9 69.7 59.4 74.9 72.2 70.7 62.7 68.6 73.3 72.5 60.9 73.5 63.8 69.9 59.5 70.0 2.6 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.2 3.0 2.0 1.8 2.3 1.8 2.0 1.7 2.3 2.3 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.4 2.0 10.2 7.3 7.9 7.2 12.4 7.2 15.2 7.3 5.5 5.8 9.6 7.8 5.3 6.0 10.9 6.2 6.9 7.1 12.3 6.8 6.9 7.3 8.1 9.2 11.1 7.0 8.7 6.1 7.4 8.3 9.8 7.5 6.8 7.5 8.8 6.9 12.7 6.8 9.7 7.6 13.3 14.4 12.6 13.5 16.2 14.0 13.7 9.7 13.2 12.9 16.1 14.1 12.9 11.6 17.2 11.5 14.6 14.2 16.0 13.6 9465 6318 13615 3658 124516 6079 9930 17572 3534 3257 35803 5057 5642 3280 18080 5018 36072 17423 4014 6219 61.0 64.2 64.1 62.4 51.8 63.8 52.0 69.6 65.4 65.6 57.6 62.9 65.7 66.5 56.4 66.0 58.2 65.2 51.9 63.2 3.0 2.7 2.6 2.8 2.8 2.7 3.4 2.6 3.0 3.7 2.9 3.0 2.2 2.6 2.8 2.4 2.8 2.7 3.3 3.2 11.4 7.5 8.7 8.9 13.5 8.5 19.2 8.1 8.1 5.5 9.8 8.8 6.5 7.0 13.0 6.5 8.1 8.5 16.3 8.4 9.0 10.0 10.6 10.4 13.3 9.0 9.9 8.5 9.3 9.4 12.5 10.5 8.6 9.6 10.4 10.0 14.6 8.8 10.7 9.9 15.6 15.7 14.0 15.5 18.5 16.0 15.6 11.2 14.1 15.7 17.2 14.8 17.0 14.2 17.3 14.9 16.3 14.8 17.8 15.4 9368 6827 16828 3661 137209 6445 9958 23037 3957 3117 39298 5118 5819 3866 17819 5698 43372 19823 3630 6907 State Totals 64.7 2.2 9.7 8.8 14.6 816065 59.2 2.8 11.1 10.8 16.1 891179 I 23MAP 10: PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS HEADED BY MARRIED COUPLES, 1990 to Sbi VSASH-HOONfe, ' I ShkxW^ ta ifflOHN, ''T 'wood CRIT sr fraH' LEE Percentage Less than 50.0% 50.0% to 54.9% 55.0% to 59.9% II? !sj51 PULASKI (sS .L POLK Si iSEMi vL'RIVEry HEKIP MILLER LA.D PAFa-NP^^^|j| CLARK : : DALLAS NEV oua'ch' COLUMB MMOyNNRn' 'HILLIPS JEFF artXo . UNO < . OeSHA .Ml .'fiREVf oHico
60.0% to 64.9% 65.0% or more DMsIon of Demogrophlc Research Unlveralty of Arkansas ot Little Rook SEB S:L0GAN
i^ I S61 d 1 ft: s ? MAP 11: PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLDS THAT ARE FEMALE
This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.
<dcterms_creator>Santi, Lawrence L.</dcterms_creator>