Date: From: May 18, 1993 Alm Brown To: Marie Parker MEMORANDUM Subject: McClellans Enrollment for 1993-94 Im concerned about reports Ive received regarding student assignments to McClellan. Below are some comments and information to set the context of my concerns about McClellan and the crucial pre-school recruitment and registration period. They are followed by some specific questions about enrollment, magnet seats, parent complaints, desegregation transfers, and recruitment. As you know, McClellans white enrollment has been steadily declining for a number of years. Since the 1989-90 academic year, the schools black enrollment has been higher than any other LRSD high school. The McClellan community school program and business/communications magnet program are very well-thought-out (and expensive) attempts to improve the schools racial balance. The district has invested considerable resources in the McClellan specialties and, with proper management and intensive recruitment, these programs hold great promise for improving desegregation at McClellan. The chart below depicts McClellans annual enrollment since 1988-89. The figures for 1993-94 reflect the schools enrollment according to information available May 10, 1993: 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Black White Total % Black 615 634 613 640 638 576 447 390 340 328 1,191 52% 1,081 59% 1,003 61% 980 65% 966 66% (710) (230) (940) (76%) The following provision regarding desegregation transfers appears at page 140 of the LRSD Desegregation Plan: Deseg^gation Transfers 1. Junior and senior high school students may transfer to another school as long as the reassignment allows both the sending and receiving school to comply with the desegregation requirement and a seat is available... The minimum and maximum black percentages constitute the desegregation requirement (or acceptable range) for a desegregation transfer. The desegregation requirement in secondary schools is that all schools will remain within a range of 12-1/2 percent above to 25 percent below the district-wide percentage of black students at each organizational level (i.e., high school and junior high school). Secondary enrollment for the 1992-93 school year determined that the acceptable maximum for a desegregation transfer on the senior high level was 675% black. Please answer the attached questions as soon as possible. If youd like to arrange a time for us to talk over these items. Ill be happy to meet with you. Thanks so much for your help. cc: Mac Bernd1. March enrollment On March 10, 1993, school assignment letters were mailed to parents. At that time, what was McClellans total enrollment (excluding kindergarten)? What was the black percentage of that number? How many of that number were 10th, 11th, and 12th graders? How many of the children in each grade were black and what percentage of each grades enrollment did that number represent? What were the comparable enrollment figures at the other LRSD high schools at that time? 2. Current enrollment What is the current enrollment of McClellan (excluding kindergarten)? What is the black percentage of that number? How many of them are 10th, 11th, and 12th graders? How many of the children in each grade are black and what percentage of each grades enrollment does that number represent? Currently, what are the comparable enrollment figures at the other LRSD high schools? 3. Magnet seats and enrollment What is the number of total magnet seats at McClellan by grade level and race? During 1992-93, how many of those seats were filled (by grade level and race)? By grade level and race, how many of the magnet seats are currently filled? 4. Parent complaints Some parents have told ODM that, according to Student Assignment, there are presently no McClellan magnet seats available and their children would have to be put on a waiting list. Is this information correct? One parent complained that someone in the LRSD Student Assignment Office discouraged him from enrolling his child at McClellan. What could account for this parents impression? 5. Desegregation transfers By grade and by race, how many desegregation transfers have been permitted from McClellan so far during the current pre-school registration period? To which schools were these transfers made? What criteria are being use to grant desegregation transfers from McClellan? 6. Recruitment What recruitment efforts have been made this year to recruit white students to McClellan? What recruitment efforts are still to be implemented to increase white enrollment at McClellan? When are these efforts scheduled?ALtS-27-1993 10:31 LRSD 501 324 2146 P.001 Vj KCg0E 5 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 FAX (501) 324:2146 _ DATC TO FROM SENDERS PHONE # -U SUBJECT SPECIAL INSIKUCnONS Number of Pages (include cover page)_z^ Fax Phone Number Speed DialAUG-27-1993 10:31 LRSD 501 324 2146 P.002 To
From
Re
Date
5<^ CKCBBBi Little Rock School District Ms. Melissa Guldin, Associate Monitor Sterling ingram^^irector - Planning, Research and Evaluation Request for Student Enrollment August 27, 1993 On Friday, August 27, 1993, you to request the third (3rd) day Rock School District. I am : I am a .m. called at approximately 9:20_ enrollment figures for the Little faxing that information to you in response to your request. Thanks. cc: Estelle Matthis Jerry L. MaloneftUG-27-1993 10:52 LRSD 501 !4 2146 P.003 IJrSDS^ooI Checklist Hiflh School* [5] Grode* 10-12 ---------------------- TdZL---------------- 1500 Pork, 72202 - 376-4751__________ -----77^^--------- .5201 Dovid O-"0odd, 72210 - 224-66OT ------------------------------------------ 6700 "H", 72205 - 661-9000 _ McClellan nior 9417 Geyer Springs, 72209 565-0314 Pnrkvifiw Fine Arts Mognet Junious Bobbs 2501 Borrow, 72204 - 225-6440 V,ntioHol-Tchnkt>l Center [f] Grode* 10-H i-ii^kg Metropolitan - Df> Doyl^ Diitohunty - 7701 Scott Hamilton, 72209 - 565-8465 lueiof High S<hool7] Grode* 7-9* Cloverdole - Ounbor - _ Forest Heights - Henderson - Mobelvale - . 6300 Hinkson Rd.. 72209 565.8426 1100 Wright Ave., 72206 - 375-5574 - 5901 Evergreen, 72205 - 66a-3391 _____. 401 Borrow Rd., 72205 - 225-3358 10811 ,V\abelvaleW^^________________ PG Box 187, Mobelvale,_72103 - 455-2413--------------- . -3793123 Mann MognTT, - 1000 2 ? Puloski Height?: _ 401 N- ------------------------ 4n..HM^t. - 3301 S.Bryont, 72204 - 565-4416 Elementory Sthool* [37] Grode* K-6 6900 Pecan Rood, 72206 490-1582 Badgett - Mory Golston - ______ ftnU - levcnno Wilson - 6501 W. 32nd, 72204 565-6621 -------------------------- . 3623 Rnseline Rd., 72209 - 565-5589 Boseline - Booker Arts Magnet - Brady - 2016 Sorbet, 72206 - 376-3319 - 7915 W. Morkhom, 72205 - 225-1315 __ Carver Mognet School - Mery Guinn - 800 Apperson, 72202 - 374-3783 (2hicot - Otis Preslor - 11100 Chicot Rd., PO Sox 405, Mobelvoie, 72103 - 563-2554______ - Cloverdol?^ _ - ^SOO Hinkson Rd., 72209 - 565-0986 Dodd - 6423 Stcgecocch Rd., 72204 - 455-3110------------: F
i7~Pa?k~--------------- . 616 N. Horrison, 72205 - 666-0359 " 16QQ N. Tyler, 72207 - 666-5415 _ Forest Park - Virginia Ashley -, Franklin * - 1701 S. Harrison, 72204 666-0348 7ulbright . Mac Huffmon - 300 Pleosont Volley Dr., 72212 - 22^gS Gorlond - __________ Geyer Springs - Eleanor Cox . 3615 W. 25th, 72204 - 666-9436 o> T 21^ A-3^ 321 :-V5g> -if! 1 }')(
Gibbs Mognet - Donno Do vis ' <* /\ rs e I 5240 Mobelvoie Pike, 72209 - 565-0184 1115 W. 16lh. 72202 - 372-0251 20 i "1 Z-l rrswii*??' ^**>*4?*' ih. i-n i22- 1 ^7nkn^l, 2-7-i^v^ gX ' ' I , QMri 5 i 71 130 12'2 203- C? Id 511 iJ-L ZU-O. i~i5 no- 3 '' Up, S' i^^Sl ! I ' 7.fc 1,2^ i i . m I h 5ZLm+.^ L , I L-x-n l4- \ SJJ342iA 2^2! i 2*^7! '-1-^ I m 1 I I 11^ 2OS Ith Jefferson - King - Mobelvale - . 3001 S. Puloski, 72206 - 376-3629 _________ . 2600 N. McKinley, 72207 - 663-9472 4800 W. 26th, 72204 - 663-6397 ,r . 9401 Mobelvoie Cut-off_____ PO Box 207, Mobelvale, 72103 - 455-2227 _______________ McDermott- ~ 1200 Reservoir Rd., 72207 - 225^^ M,,rlnwrl
ff - Jerry Worm '- 25 Sheraton Or., 72209 - 563-032 Mitcheir' P41Q aottery. 72206 - 375-6931 _ Otter Creek - 16000 Otter Creek Pkwy., 72209 - 455-3320 Elementary SchoeU l<antinu<il an back) inSi 201 3^ n 3Z S3: mi 275 lX:3iZ W i 4^:^3' mo ^tlXiS 22,61/ ll 15212, x,o\z- uMzV (ii=l>7^ S(L) 3^^ CM- I a^3 u/iuif 1 6pW^ 1^17Prepared by The Office of Desegregation Monitoring Based upon information furnished by the LRSD Little Rock School District Enrollment Comparison Oct 1 1992 vs Sept 71993 Day after Labor Day 1 School Principal 1 2 5 8 12 Central High Hall High______________ Parkview High__________ Fair High McClellan Community High Totals for High Schools 1 1 1 1 1 Rudolph Howard Vic Anderson Junious Babbs Al Niven Jodie Carter Black 92-93 1133 560 485 562 638 3378 White 92-93 761 390 358 310 312 2131 Other 92-93 56 11 14 ___W 123 Total 92-93 1950 976 854 886 966 5632 edacity Black 93-94 1070 544 469 580 641 3304 White 93-94 630 321 297 282 243 1773 Other 93-94 43 34 20 8 7 112 Total 93-94 1743 899 786 870 891 5189 Black Diff -63 -16 __ 18 3 -74 White Diff -131 -69 -61 -28 -69 -358 Other Diff -13 8 9 -6 -9 -11 Total Diff -207 -77 -68 -16 -75 -443 Total % Diff -10.62% -7.89% -7.96% -1.81% -7.76% -7.87% 92 Black Percent 58.10% 57.38% 56.79% 63.43% 66.05% 59.98% 93 Black Percent 61.39% 60.51% 59.67% 66.67% 71.94% 63.67% Percent Diff 3.29% 3.13% 2.88% 3.24% 5.90% 3.69% 3 7 9 10 11 13 15 16 Mann Jr. High Dunbar Jr High Forest Heights Pulaski Hts. Jr High Southwest Jr High Henderson Jr High Cloverdale Jr. High Mablevale Jr. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Marian Lacey Nancy Volson Richard Maple Ralph Hoffman Charity Smith Clell Watts Gayle Bradford 505 410 554 452 Totals for Junior High Schools 523 685 571 438 4138 327 283 319 166 215 192 226 1948 17 12 13 3 6 14 12 3 80 849 705 787 774 695 914 775 667 6166 479 438 542 432 507 678 528 339 3943 336 243 187 357 145 199 122 169 1758 18 9 14 6 10 25 7 6 95 833 690 743 795 662 902 657 514 5796 -26 28 -12 -20 -16 -7 -43 -99 -195 9 -40 ~-33 38 -21 -16 -70 -57 -190 1 -3 1 3 4 11 -5 3 15 -16 -15 -44 21 -33 -12 -118 -153 -370 -1.88% -2.13% -5.59% 2.71% -4.75% -1.31% I -15.23% -22.94% -6.00% 59.48% 58.16% 70.39% 58.40% 75.25% 74.95% 73.68% 65.67% 67.11% 57.50% 63.48% 72.95% 54.34% 76.59% 75.17% 80.37% 65.95% 68.03% -1.98% 5.32% 2.55% -4.06% 1.33% 0.22% 6.69% 0.29% 0.92% 19 17 22 6 18 21 28 yr 32 23 24 25 48 26 37 27 49 30 35 46 20 Badgett Bale Baseline Booker Brady Carver Chicot Cloverdale Dodd Fair Park Forest Park Franklin Fulbright Garland Geyer Springs Gibbs Ish Jefferson King Mablevale McDermott 3 3 3 6 3 6 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 4 3 6 4 3 5 3 3 Mary Golston Levanna Wilson Mary Jane Cheatham Dr. Cheryl Simmons Mary Menking Mary Guinn________ Otis Presler Frederick Fields Barbara Means Virginia Ashley Franklin Davis Mac Huffman Robert Brown Eleanor Cox Donna Davis Stan Strauss Francis Cawthon Sadie Mitchell Julie Davenport Mike Oliver 154 248 262 345 275 329 350 291 183 192 198 352 225 233 177 191 182 204 48 62 74 269 111 262 177 71 121 49 242 50 296 17 105 134 5 273 0 11 3 7 12 7 8 4 0 2 4 9 9 6 0 11 0 6 202 321 339 621 398 598 535 366 304 243 444 411 530 256 282 336 187 483 278 275 219 220 3 14 500 509 257 401 390 656 467 613 558 492 328 351 376 544 540 346 328 353 0 492 7M 515 517 126 222 262 324 255 319 352 304 177 198 197 293 244 182 182 168 a 206 371 310 251 52 62 71 262 131 257 136 78 94 67 254 34 269 3 ^80 118 0 280 202 172 237 0 12 6 11 14 7 5 7 5 5 3 6 17 21 4 g 0 4 7 3 15 178 296 339 597 400 583 493 389 276 270 454 333 530 206 266 295 ~0 490 580 485 503 -28 -26 0 -21 -20 -10 2 13 -6 6 -1 -59 19 -51 5 -23 -182 2 371 32 -24 4 0 -3 -7 20 -5 -41 7 -27 18 12 -16 -27 -14 -25 -16 T 7 202 -47 17 0 1 3 4 2 0 -3 3 5 3 -1 -3 8 15 4 -2 0 -2 7 0 1 -24 -25 0 -24 2 -15 -42 23 -28 27 10 -78 0 -50 -16 -41 -187 7 580 -15 -6 -11.88% -7.79% 0.00% -3.86% 0.50% -2.51% -7.85% 6.28% -9.21% 11.11% 2.25% -18.98% 0.00% -19.53% -5.67% -12.20% -100.00% 1.45% 76.24%, 77.26% 77.29% 55.56% 69.10% 55.02% 65.42% 79.51% 60.20% 79.01% 44.59% 85.64% 42.45% 91.02% 62.77% 56.85% 97.33% 42.24% 70 79% 75.00% 77.29% 54.27% 63.75% 54.72% 71.40% 78.15% 64.13% 73.33% 43.39% 67.99% 46.04% 88.35% 68.42% 56.95% -5.45% -2.26% 0.00% -1.28% -5.35% -0.30% 5.98% -1.36% 3.93% -5.68% -1.20% 2.34% 3.58% -2.67% 5.66% 0.10% -3.00% -1.18% 55.60% 54.03% 42.04% 63.97% 63.92% 49.90% -0.20% 8.32% -4.13%Prepared by The Office of Desegregation Monitoring Based upon information furnished by the LRSD Little Rock School District Enrollment Comparison Oct 1 1992 vs Sept 71993 Day after Labor Day 2 School Principal 33 34 50 38 39 36 40 41 47 51 42 52 29 43 44 45 Meadowdiff Mitchell Otter Creek Pulaski Hts. Rightsell Rockefeller Romine Stephens Terry Wakefield Washington Watson Western Hills Williams Wilson Woodruff 3j 4 3 s' 4 4 ? 4 3 3 5 3 3 6 3 3 Jerry Worm Samuel Branch Carolyn Teeter Lillie Carter Sharon Davis Anne Mangan Lionel Ward Lonnie Dean La Dell Looper Willie Morris Karen Buchanan Teresa Courtney Totals for Elementary Schools Dr. Ed Jackson Gwen Ziegler Pat Higgenbotham Black 92-93 292 232 143 198 239 250 277 202 238 347 483 332 209 275 265 147 9073 White 92-93 147 28 203 173 9 104 74 7 286 147 332 117 124 218 90 83 4947 Other 92-93 1 4 7 8 1 7 ___10 0 17 6 ____ 2 2 9 0 4 201 Total 92-93 440 264 353 379 249 361 361 209 541 500 822 451 335 502 355 234 14221 Capacity 442 346 351 351 346 425 467 298 492 492 939 492 328 517 394 324 16256 Black 93-94 294 205 130 192 182 237 233 139 242 322 450 365 209 240 259 143 8785 White 93-94 134 18 195 199 4 93 68 3 290 107 261 86 117 211 89 82 4816 Other 93-94 1 2 6 11 1 8 14 1 26 6 12 0 3 10 4 5 271 Total 93-94 429 225 331 402 187 338 315 143 558 435 723 451 329 461 352 230 13872 Black Diff 2 -27 -13 -6 -57 -13 -44 -63 -25 -33 33 0 -35 -6 -4 -288 White Diff -13 -10 -8 26 -5 -11 -6 -4 4 -40 -71 -31 -7 -7 -1 -1 -131 Other Diff 0 -2 -1 3 0 1 4 1 9 ____0 5 -2 1 T 4 1 70 Total Diff -11 -39 -22 23 -62 -23 -46 -66 17 -65 -99 0 ___ -41 -3 -4 -349 Total % Diff -2.50% -14.77% -6.23% 6.07% -24.90% -6.37% -12.74% -31.58% 3.14% -13.00% -12.04% 0.00% -1.79% -8.17% -0.85% -1.71% -2.45% 92 Black Percent 66.36% 87.88%, 40.51% 52.24% 95.98% 69.25% 76.73% 96.65% 43.99% 69.40% 58.76% 73.61% 62.39% 54.78% 74.65% 62.82% 63.80% 93 Black Percent 68.53% 91.11% 39.27% 47.76% 97.33% 70.12% 73.97% 97.20% 43.37% 74.02% 62.24% 80.93% 63.53% 52.06% 73.58% 62.17% 63.33% Percent Diff 2.17% 3.23% -1.23% -4.48% 1.34% 0.87% -2.76% 0.55% -0.62% 4.62% 3.48% 7.32% 1.14% -2.72% -1.07% -0.65% -0.47% Totals for the School District 16589 9026 404 26019 16032 8347 478 24857 -557 -679 74 -1162 -4.47% 63.76% 64.50% 0.74%fl d ur FEB 19 1993 Offica of Cese^
n f.' FORMULA FOR CALCULATING ACCEPTABLE RACIAL RANGE 1993-94 Basis of calculations
October 1, 1992 enrollment Elementary: Enrollment Less Magnet Enrl. Total 14,003 2,057 Area School Enrl. 11,946 Black 3994 1140 7854 %Black 64 55.42 65.75 65.75 X .125 8.22 73.97 74.00% Maximum Black % 40.00% Minimum Black % (Set by Plan) Junior High: Enrollment Less Magnet Enrl. Area School Enrl. 6166 849 5317 4138 505 3633 67 59.48 68.33 68.33 X .125 8.54 76.87 76.75% Maximum Black % 68.33 X .25 = 17.08 51.25% Minimum Black % Senior High: Enrollment Less Magnet Enrl. Area School Enrl. 5632 871 4761 3378 501 2877 60 57.52 60.43 60.43 X .125 7.55 67.98 68.00% Maximum Black % 60.43 X .25 15.11 45.32 45.50% Minimum Black %School Enrollment % BIk Elem Jr. High High Area Badgel Elem Bale Elem Baseline Elem Booker Elem Brady Elem Carver Elem Ghicol Elem Cloverdale Dodd Elem Fair Park Elem Forest Park Franklin Elem Fulbright Elem Garland Elem Geyer Springs Gibbs Elem Ish Elem Jefferson Elem King Elem Mabelvale McDermott Meadowcliff Mitdieft Elem Otter Creek Pul Heights Rightsell Elem 189 303 343 595 397 595 609 386 292 263 458 345 520 205 288 299 504 553 488 509 434 230 341 398 189 70 74 77 54 33 55 70 79 65 76 44 87 45 88 72 57 42 65 64 51 71 93 41 48 97 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1993-94 Incentive Magnet Inter- diSt Magnet Inter- dist Magnet Prog 4-Year- Olds Prog X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Annexed X X X X X X X X Comments Closed after the 1992-93 school year. Qpbri^ frit the 1993^94 sishSchool Enrollment % BIk Elem Jr. High High Area Incentive Magnet Inter- dist Magnet Inter- dist Magnet Prog 4-Year- Olds Prog Annexed Comments Rockefeller 340 71 X X X X An incentive school with an early childhood magnet program serving children beginning a 6-weeks old Romine Elem 334 74 X X Stephens Bern Terry Elem Waketieid Elem Washington Watson Efem Western Hills Williams Etem Wilson Elem Woodruff Elem Cloverdale Jr. Dunbar Jr. Forest Heights Henderson Jr. Mabelvate Jr. Mann Jr. Pulaski Heights Southwest Jr. Central High Fair High HallMigh McClellan High Parkview High High Sch Kind 145 561 447 721 442 332 472 354 236 701 701 788 915 654 851 790 679 1,829 899 958 866 768 127 97 43 7S 63 80 65 74 62 81 63 73 74 69 58 65 77 64 65 61 75 58 87 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X An area school with a magnet program. X X X X X X X X X X X X X An area school with: a magnet program. An area school with a magnet program. All high schools house 1 or 2 kindergarten classes.School Acceptable Balance Otter Creek Jefferson Terry Forest Park Fulbright Pulaski Hts. McDermott Out of Balance Woodruff Mablevale Dodd Western Hills Brady Meadowcliff Chicot Badgett Geyer Springs Wilson Wakefield Bale Fair Park Baseline Watson Cloverdale Incentive Franklin Garland Mitchell Stephens Rightsell Rockefeller Interdistrict Washington King Romine Magnet Booker Williams Carver Gibbs LRSD Enrollment Showing Available Seats and Excess Capacity Principal Carolyn Teeter Francis Cawthon La Dell Looper Virginia Ashley Mac Huffman Lillie Carter Mike Oliver Pat Higgenbotham Julie Davenport Mary Menking Jerry Worm Otis Presler Mary Golston Eleanor Cox Gwen Ziegler Willie Morris Levanna Wilson Barbara Means Mary Jane Cheatha Teresa Courtney Frederick Fields Franklin Davis Robert Brown Samuel Branch Lonnie Dean Sharon Davis Anne Mangan Karen Buchanan Sadie Mitchell Lionel Ward Capacity Black Other Total 93-94 Black Available Dr. Cheryl Simmons Dr. Ed Jackson Mary Guinn Donna Davis Totals for Elementary Schools Below Capacity Seats & Percent of Capacity BOBSSPEC.XLS 93-94 93-94 93-94 Percent Seats 351 492 492 376 540 351 517 141 213 243 200 233 190 262 200 291 318 258 287 208 247 3119 1482 1809 341 504 561 458 520 398 509 3291 41.35% 42.26% 43.32% 43.67% 44.81% 47.74% 51.47% 45.03% 10 -12 -69 -82 20 -47 8 -172 324 515 328 328 467 442 558 257 328 394 492 401 351 390 492 492 147 311 189 215 265 306 346 124 208 263 337 216 200 247 353 277 89 177 103 117 124 128 144 49 80 91 110 69 63 65 89 69 6559 4004 1567 236 488 292 332 389 434 490 173 288 354 447 285 263 312 442 346 5571 62.29% 63.73% 64.73% 64.76% 68.12% 70.51% 70.61% 71.68% 72.22% 74.29% 75.39% 75.79% 76.05% 79.17% 79.86% 80.06% 71.87% 88 27 36 -4 78 8 68 84 40 40 45 116 88 78 50 146 988 544 346 346 298 346 425 300 181 215 141 184 240 2305 1261 939 728 487 1667 451 357 247 808 660 515 613 351 321 257 325 170 2139 1073 45 24 15 4 5 100 193 270 196 87 466 274 215 270 129 888 345 205 230 145 189 340 1454 721 553 334 1274 595 472 595 299 1961 15789 8628 4923 13551 2238 86% 86.96% 88.29% 93.48% 97.24% 97.35% 70.59% 86.73% 62.55% 64.56% 73.95% 63.42% 53.95% 54.45% 54.62% 56.86% 54.72% 63.67% 199 141 116 153 157 85 851 218 175 153 546 65 43 18 52 178 2238Date: May 17, 1993 From: Bob & Polly MEMORANDUM To: Subject: Ann McClellans Enrollment for 1993-94 Below are the highlights of a telephone conversation between Polly and Mattie Ruth Tipton, McClellans registrar, on May 17,1993 about McClellans 1993-94 enrollment and the loss of 109 students. On March 11, one day after all assignments had been made and letters mailed to parents, Mattie Ruth pulled up on the terminal McClellans enrollment: 1,029 students (not including kindergarten students) 75.1% total black population 427 tenth graders 336 black 91 white 78.7% black 213% white All other high schools were eight to ten percentage points higher than McClellans black percentage. On April 23, Mattie Ruth pulled up on the terminal McClellans enrollment: 929 students (not including kindergarten students) 75.4% total black population 336 tenth graders 268 black 68 white 79.8% black 203% white McClellan had lost 100 students, 91 of which were tenth graders, between March 11 and April 23. Mattie Ruth and Mr. Carter met with Marie Parker on the 23rd to find out why McClellan had lost so many tenth graders. Reason given: student assignment had "worked the deseg transfers".On May 10, Mattie Ruth pulled up on the terminal McClellans enrollment: 920 students 755% total black population No tenth graders transferred 9 eleventh and twelfth graders transferred out 5 black 4 white This information was given to Marie Parker during a meeting on April 23, Dr. Bernd during a meeting on May 10, and the Biracial Monitoring Team last week during a monitoring visit. Both Mattie Ruth and Mr. Carter attended the meetings with Marie Parker and Dr. Bernd. Reported incidents: Dr. Stanford from UALR wanted to enroll a child in McClellan. At the Student Assignment Office, Dr. Stanford was discouraged about enrolling in McClellan: no magnet seats, lives in Central attendance zone, really does not want to send child to McClellan. Enrolled at Central Another person wanting a McClellan assignment was told by the Student Assignment Office they would have to be put on a waiting list. Enrolled in another district high school. A tenth grader wanted to be assigned to Fair where her boyfriend attended. She received a deseg transfer to Fair. A parent was dissatisfied with the McClellan baseball coach. Student Assignment granted a deseg transfer. McClellan has a 100% black satellite attendance zone. We requested and Bob picked up from Mattie Ruth the attached copies of the enrollment print-out for the above dates.General Information: McClellans Enrollment 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Black White Total % Black 615 576 1,191 52% 634 447 1,081 59% 613 390 1,003 61% 640 340 980 65% 638 328 966 66% 710 230 940 76% Desegregation Transfers 1. Junior and senior high school students may transfer to another school as long as the reassignment allows both the sending and receiving school to comply with the desegregation requirement and a seat is available... The minimum and maximum black percentages constitute the desegregation requirement (or acceptable range) for a desegregation transfer. The desegregation requirement tn secondary schools is that all schools will remain within a range of 12-1/2 percent above to 25 percent below the district-wide percentage of black students at each organizational level (i.e., high school and junior high school). Desegregation Plan, page 140 LRSD For the 1992-93 school year, the acceptable maximum for a desegregation transfer on the senior high level was 6750% black. Questions: With McClellans black enrollment, why were deseg transfers permitted after March 11? According to our information, McClellans magnet program has never been full. Why were parents told either there were no seats or they would have to be put on a waiting list? Why are personnel in the LRSD Student Assignment Office discouraging parents to enroll their children at McClellan? What recruitment efforts have been made this year to recruit white students to McClellan? Why did not a "red flag" appear in student assignment when McClellans black enrollment increased 10 percentage points since last school year? How does LRSD plan to correct the increasing black enrollment at McClellan? Why can parents so easily get deseg transfers from McClellan?/TA Po// Little Rock School District September 3, 1993 RECEiVEO SEP 7 1993 To
Mrs. Ann Brown, Federal Monitor From: ,stelle Matthis, Interim Superintendent Subject: Office of Desegrcgaiion i. aing Enrollment Figures for Romine and Washington Interdistrict Schools Per your request, the following information is provided by the District's Student Assignment Office: INTRADISTRICT TRANSFERS - 1992-93 School: Romine Interdistrict Elementary School Students: Black 144 White 59 Total Enrollment 203 School: Washington Elementary Interdistrict School Students: Black 176 White 186 Total Enrollment 362 We will make I regret the delay in responding to your request. an extra effort to be more timely. Please call if additional information is needed. EM:nr 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)324-200009/.08/93 15:08 301 324 2032 L R School Dlst ODM 001/004 ( LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 FAX (501) 324-2032 DATE: TO: <3 . FROM: SENDER'S PHONE#: SUBJECT: SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: Number of Pages (include cover page . Speed Dial _________ Fax Phone Number ^7/ - C> I CiC> 09/08/93 15:09 501 324 2032 L R School Dlst ODM 0002/004 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION DEPARTMENT Date
September 8, 1993 To: Melissa Guldin, Associate Monitor From: Sterling Ingramf^Director Planning, Research and Evaluation Re: Enrollment Data Attached you will find the eleventh day enrollment data, as requested. Official October 1, 1993 information will be forwarded as soon as the report is completed. If additional information is needed, please let me know. bjgt 09-08-93 13:09 301 324 2032 L R School Dlst s>ep ODM 08,93 0003-004 11:06 Nc ,002 P .02 r LRSD School Checklist , niff High SehooU [SI Grade, 10^ 12 _r_ar^l - Everett Hawks - 1500 Pork, 72202'- 376-475 -
:A12P' - Soni Sloeort 5201 ^'cvld O. Dodd, 72210 Bill Bornhouta ' ~ 6700 "H", 72205 -?61-90dQ' ^2.**]!' '^'^olph Howard - 9217 Ge^g Porkvie^^,- f 224-6609 ir Springs, 72209 . SdS-OSU Bobbs 2501 Borrow. 72204' 225-6440 VoeeHonol-Technicol Cenf.r [I'fGrodAs lolfx' ' _ Metropa!a_an_-r. DoyleJ^lahani^ Homiltoi. 7'25H77
74:^ Junior Htflh SchooU [8J Gro'des 7-9 --------, 63'oo Hlnksan Rd., 72209 - "f.dTwx" --------Lacey - 11?6 Wright Ave., 722O6r37S:n74------------------------------------ Forest Heights James Wise -~'S9Xl"'Evergreen, 72205 -'66r33?r~ ____Gradberry 401 Borrow Rd., 72205 225-3358" ____.Mobelvale Clell Walls - igsi'~Mobeivale W.. -------------------------- PC 3x 1S7, Mobelvaie, 72103 . 455-2^13 ft ......J-M -tp ....U-IMasJJji' -^^'1 j > ! 5% xo.. W'^ .'nL. 5Vh^ (pt-j 1 5. m.O..] (1,3 * - V i.yB I 0 3&d-R. ----- loop E. Roosevelt Rd", 72206 - 372-3123 uloiki Heights - Dr. Jim Haley - 401 N. Pine, 72205 - 664-"7073-------------------- -------McLaughlin -3301 .5, Bryant. 722Dr."56S-44i6 '--------------------------------------------------------- EUmantory Sehook [37] Grades K-S' ' 6900 'p'^roiT^pd, 72206 - '4^1582------------------ Wilson . 6501'77.' 32nd, 72204 - 565-6621-------------------- T^nno Tatum 3623~Baseline Rd., 72209 -'"sdST^-------------------- ''.'1 - 2016 Barber, 72206 - SZdlaS 19 --------glSfy ihomas - 7915 W. Marfcham. 72205 225-7'815 -------^^ir_^.'?Snttt School Mary Guimi'"-" 800 A7p~erson. 72202 - 374.T77r" Chicot - Olis'Prusiar - IIIQ'q Chicot Rd., --------------------------- 6900 Pc-con Rood, ^2206 490.1562 icm Carver Magntfl 72205 2251615 PO Box 405^ Mabatyglp, 72103 568-25^ 14 Dednson . 6500 Hinksan~PH 72209 : 565:^ ..........Nelson - 6423 Stogacoaeh Rd.. 72204455-3110 ......-''' Qill 616 N. Harrison, 72205 - 666^359 " ' ..........Ashley 1600 N. Tylur, 722d7'^^
34T5_____________________________ i-rrwLli A ak - .. . . * -^^_______ _____ Rd.. 72204 - 455-3110 .-rcnklin - Connie Aston 1701 S. Ilniiitori, 72204 - 666-0348 I ____ * * Wv'\*v*v Huffman - 300 Pieasent Volley~5^.' 722127224-2350 --------'. Pp.Cheryl A." Simmons . 361.5 \w"2Slh. 72204 - 666-9^'6~ Eleanc^r Cax - 5240 --------Magnei Donno Davis - 1115 W, 16th^ 72202 - 372-02.81 --------iZhcMiihq^liyer - 30^
'Pu[oski, 72206 737613629'................ -------- 663-9472 --------Goodwin - 4800 W. 26th, 72204 - '663-6397 ' 2 - 224-2350 on*
--------Foull.ner-'9d0-| "Mobelvule Cul-^ff _______207, Mobelvole, '72103 455-2227 -------- --------Mcber^H lynn Moore - 1200 Rcservair Rd., 72207 - 22T61^6S..... . .Meodoweliff Jerry Wom77~25 Sheroton Dr., 72209^ Mikheil Danila .Hu^eth - 2410 Bettery, - 565-0324 Qner Creek - PoTPrice 72206 - 37.5-6931 16Q0Q Oner Creak Pkwy., 72207 ** l*l-w*rrfirtzv^ / 423-3320 i3(, 425 ^l3'd Ji ) 0 .233 ..,5^ .2^^' .5^ ' r:',o r/ JA^J' 6 i'r2Tj) "hI A' 7^^'' -f -m. cis-.S' 7 I?) 'll .ky. S5' 3^ I '*7*^ in fl I I 3 46'^^ H5 -......^13 ..J^ ri.,_ sjo 34 (, I -----'Jxl M' { ------------..luj H lACL-U-i, ......IVl. \\T i 5'1 ! iaoG ij'^5 11L ?lb I . I .....J.-3^ iT'Kd' c3__ --U 15 I 331 ( J09/08/93 13:10 0301 324 2032 L R School Dlst ODM 004/004 IB LRSD School Checklist Etamentary School* [37] Grode* K<-6 (conttnutd) Pvioski Haights - E6dja McCoy - '319' N. Pine, 72205 663-9469 ___Rightsell ~ Kay lost 911 W. 19th. 72206 - 374-7448___________ Roeke^eller - Anne Mongon - 700 E. 17fh, 72206 - 374-1226 Romina - Lionel Ward 3400 Romine Rd., 72204 225-8tl33 - __^hert5_- Stan Strouts - 3700 W. iSth, 72204 - 663-8374 Terry - Noncy Volsen - 10800 Mora Lynn Dr., 72211 -225-1215 Wakefield - Lloyd Black - 75 Westminster, 72209 - 568-3674 f Woth'tngton Lonnie Sue Peon 115 W, 27th, 72206 375-5275 _ Wattcn - Dr. Diana Glaae - 7000 Votisy Dr., 72209 565-1577 Wastarn l-lill - Maggie Puckett - 4901 Western Hills, 72204 - 562-2247 _Williams Magnet - Dr. Ed Jackion - 7301 Evergreen, 72207 666-0346 Wilson - Seine Price - 4015 Stannus Rd., 72204.565-0924 Woodruff - Keren Buchanan - 3010 W. 7th, 72205 -.665-4149 q' ^^- i). A bn gits) nt AnZ cMJ \%^1. 1 ss lis m3. .'iii lg3S7 - 13. ...zJl. -e2-O T _L JJl -A- 0 _3. IH-S im. J1J_ .W, ^.^\. "1^ jiJh.. 1^ < i' yn n'U MH i,^.5 ... . 1 ( I I -1 I I I I 1 I i f00/08/93 15:08 301 324 2032 L R School DISt ODM @001/004 ( LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 FAX (501) 324-2032 DATE: -?3 TO: FROM: SENDER''S PHONE#: SUBJECT: SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: Number of Pages (include cover page Speed Dial__________ Fax Phone Number S-7J "G ICiC> oa/08/93 15:09 301 324 2032 L R School Dlst ODM 002/004 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION DEPARTMENT Date
September 8, 1993 To
Melissa Guldin, Associate Monitor From
Sterling Ingramf^Director Planning, Research and Evaluation Re: Enrollment Data Attacbed you will find the eleventh day enrollment data, as requested. Official October 1, 1993 information will be forwarded as soon as the report is completed. If additional information is needed, please let me know. bjgI 09'08/93 13:09 301 324 2032 L R School Dlst ODM 08.93 0003.-004 ll''O6 Nc .002 P , 02 t r . High SchooU [5] Grodet 10-12 LRSD School Checklist - Centrol . E~ver(t Howks - isop Pc^2202 ' 376-4757 .
___i-A. Pair - Sqm St, ------- ------------------------------- iy.yPO ^701 pcvid O. Dodd, 72210 - 224-6609 Hall R-ll a k-------------- - - 444-6609 -2^.Ml?nf'Ouse - 6700 "H", 72205 - 6779000---------------------------- ^Oellon - R'-'d9l_ph H^7r7^417A^^r
^7^^ ------- 2SQ] Borrow. 72204 ft ...Cl-'Zi.. FzI. .....4 - Had..u a.'ixi ^25 1 c: h 0 ^3/7 - - VeeQlone|.T,ehnict,[ Cnt,, [lyGrgda, 10-12 S6S-846S > <^ F\ I /5 / I VA ...'JU, Uc Junior High SchpoU [sf Gra'dei - - ------i~ --------Sooth . 630FH
nl<jan Rd., 7226
. --------5H!LLM2'-fpn Lacey - 11^' Wright Ave,, 7220?7375,' barest Heights Jomas Wie,-. _ --------n3....... - ' a63-3391 --------*^0^ Borrow RdJJ 72205 72209 . 65-8426 ::-S574 - 5901 Evergreen, 72205 - 663-3391 -------Mobelvale - Clell Wgtl
-'laSlTMabelvnle W "'----------- FO Sux_I87, Mobelvale, 72103 . 455-2413 ---------^^7 V'7?
Anderson - IQQQ E.^Rj^^eyelt Rd.,_722n6 ^^g9ht5 - Dr-Jim Holey - 401 hi. Pine,'72205 - 664-7073------ --------McLoughlin . ,3301 .5. Brygnt, 722br.~5A4.42ix ' ' Elemantory SehooU [oFf Grodes K-6 664.7073 372-3123'' ^90D Pfccon Rood, 72206 --------------- M/iison - dsom 32nd. 72204.56S-662'l--------------------- ------- Anna Tolum 3623ba^e Rd..'729nP ---------------- --------1227 :,Hgle_n Thoff,a, 7915 W. Marfchcm. 72205 225-"lS15 Sehpol M7.2A2*5='725or3S:H , _ Chjcot - Olli, PrcJcr . ] n QO Chi ------ 565*5539 ->."1.0..j' (,3 ' 11L ''J f >-f jAy-'Chj
' ,-9<j.'j(ill -zAV'Oi ..h LS bi Ut. rM^^-lAClsj^a tu n r- .c>. H-... .s.C)
-] JO 21 .5^ .3 n ^s- snil'Sa , p 0 11'1^)' l""'71 li Ab9\.. Li3i i#: I Wr'ii ,'i ' l3 'I. 'll _________ licot Rd., PO Box 405, Mabelvale, 72103.568-2554 -----gy?-L. ..'..{?oqoollp* Deamon - 6500 Hinkson Rd., 7220? i 565-0986 --------Agf Nelson - 6423 Stggecoqch Rd., 72204 J 455.35'10 .......N. Harrison, 72205 - 666^0359 ' --------Ashley'. 1600 ,\. Tylur, 72207~66(l^------------------------------------------------- .-rqnklin - Connie Aston 1701 S. ' '^ ------------- 1-1011 bon, 722C4 - 666.0343 --------Moc-Huffmon . 300 Pleasant Volley Dr.."72?~i
~224.235Q cjorland . Or. Cheryl A. Simm, ....... I- --
-.-... --
"r. Z1..ZIU. - 666-94.16 Springs- aegno^Caz^^^ 7
2Gg --------^bbs Mggnei . Donno Davis - 1115 W. 76fh,"722D??37rii2r----------- --------Slij ' Michce^Oliver - SOOTsrprioiki, 72206 -"3777629' ................ --------. 663-9472 --------Bobbie Goodwin - 4800 W. 26th 7??rir: AAyj.2a-r XAnkA ii^lx. . Pk _ l * * " ion*
3615 W.''2Slh. 72204 - 666.9436 --------Foutkner- 9401 Mqbelvule CulAfF'---------------------------------------------------- -----------^Q7, Mobelvoie, 72103 455.2227 --------------------------- --------^i'^^Lynn Mporc'.' 1200 R
7
ir Rd., 72207.2
2To^61----- 7 ^^7.yw^n,?72nh
7
i
7K77^^ . . MOehell - Oon.la He^peth 2410 Sctte,7. 72204 . q75.xc.Qi------------ f^PlAr { VAJhL t>_ n.-' - '' * _Qner Creek - Forprice. i6qqq 6T
rc?
z>iz: f * * F wrt >ut..R^ r- 7220? 455 3320 aaq. sq- .m. .^J. .^33/71 : I -i I "I yyi (-I -s I -UelZiSj.,5" '7J\ .3.... a'7/. U4 -------U.iJ55J..5-MS-B 73 lamm 3 a-s'-j 43 5 45/^ ----------- -----------zi(
: .1^? MU XVL T^lb '*! li. Ji olbC ^^3 i ...b-.'i i 5'7 i i 213C, -4^-S i' if'-t ....nii I?. 3<SI w. 130 --k -bsa.-.-T 0 <r\ /I f LdLi5 33} i09/08/93 15:10 501 324 2032 L R School Dlst ODM 0004/004 LRSD School Checklist ElTnntQry Sehoel* [37] Grad* K-4 (eontfnutd) Piilo$ki Haights - Eddia MeCoy 319 N. Ping, 72205 6639469_____________ Rightsall ~ Koy toss 911 W. 19th, 72206 374-7448_______________________ Rockafaller - Anne Mongon 700 E, 17th, 72206 - 374-1226 Romina Lionel Word - 3400 Rornina Rd'., 72204 - 225-8833 - Stephens - Stan Strauss - 3700 W. 1 Sth, 72204 - 663-8374 Terry - Nancy Volsen - 10800 Mora Lynn Dr,, 72211 - 225-1215____________ Waketield - Lloyd Black - 75 Westminster, 72209 - 568-3674 Washington - Lonnie Sue Peon 115 W, 2ih, 72206 375-8275 Watson - Dr. Diana Glaze - /OOb'Voiley Or-, 72209 565-'1577 Wastarn Hilts Margie Puckett - 4901 Western Hills, 72204 - 562-2247 _^W!Iiiams Magnet - Dr. Ed Jockion - 7301 Evergreen, 72207 666-0346 Wilson Reine Price - 4015 Stonnus Rd.. 72204 - 565-0924 Woodruff - Keren Suchonan - 3010 W, 7fh, 72205 665-4149 AAA' "A ..I i *13 Ah! An. _JU. Bilk s. __ZJA 1^^ ay? i 9, fm SS :5^sr AL3_ \^3 M _L Aik jL IS o _3. _A I 5KS' AiL^ jSSX 2BLi. Jl]_ .w.. US. JL^. U (g Al_' -kAi... azik.. 11^1 r-^iMru I I -1 I i 4.. - I 1 I I I 1 I {Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 376-6200 Fax (501) 371 -0100 Date: September 10, 1993 To: Little Rock School District Board of Education Members From: in Brown Subject: 1993-94 LRSD Enrollment Figures After last nights Agenda Meeting, my associate Bob Morgan gave the enclosed chart to Estelle Matthis because there had been an inquiry about enrollment numbers during the meeting. Bob used ODMs PC software to quickly compile and format this information. The chart compares school-by-school October 1, 1992 enrollment data with the numbers we received from Sterling Ingram on September 7, 1993. We hope you will find this preliminary information helpful. Enc. cc: Hank Williams Estelle MatthisPrepared by The Office of Desegregation Monitoring Based upon information furnished by the LRSD Little Rock School District Enrollment Comparison Oct 1 1992 vs Sept 7 1993 Day after Labor Day 1 School Principal 1 2 5 8 12 Central High I Hall High______________ Parkview High__________ Fair High McClellan Community High Totals for High Schools 1 1 1 1 1 Rudolph Howard Vic Anderson Junious Babbs Al Niven Jodie Carter Black 92-93 1133 560 485 562 638 3378 White 92-93 761 390 358 310 312 2131 Other 92-93 56 26 11 14 16 123 Total 92-93 1950 976 854 886 966 5632 Capacity Black 93-94 1070 544 469 580 641 3304 White 93-94 630 321 297 282 243 1773 Other 93-94 43 34 20 8 7 112 Total 93-94 1743 899 786 870 891 5189 Black Diff -63 -16 -16 18 3 -74 White Diff -131 Ira -61 -28 -69 -358 Other Diff -13 8 9 -6 -9 -11 Total Diff -207 -77' -68 -16 -75 443 Total % Diff -10.62% -7.89% -7.96% -1.81% -7.76% -7.87% 92 Black Percent 58.10% 57.38% 56.79% 63.43% 66.05% 59.98% 93 Black Percent 61.39% 60.51% 59.67% 66.67% 71.94% 63.67% Percent Diff 3.29% 3.13% 2.88% 3.24% 5.90% 3.69% 3 7 9 10 11 13 15 16 Mann Jr. High Dunbar Jr High Forest Heights Pulaski Hts. Jr High Southwest Jr High Henderson Jr High Cloverdale Jr. High Mablevale Jr. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Marian Lacey Nancy Volson Richard Maple Ralph Hoffman Charity Smith Clell Watts Gayle Bradford Totals for Junior High Schools 505 410 554 452 523 685 571 438 4138 327 283 220 319 166 215 192 226 1948 17 12 13 3 6 14 12 3 80 849 705 787 774 695 914 775 667 6166 479 438 542 432 507 678 528 339 3943 336 243 187 357 145 199 122 169 1758 18 9 14 6 10 25 ~T 6 95 833 690 743 795 662 902 657 514 5796 -26 28 -12 -20 -16 -7 -99 -195 9 -40 -33 38 -21 -16 -70 -57 -190 1 -3 1 3 4 11 -5 3 15 -16 -15 -44 21 -33 -12 -118 -153 -370 -1.88% -2.13% -5.59% 2.71% -4.75% -1.31% -15.23% -22.94% -6.00% 59.48% 58.16% 70.39% 58.40% 75.25% 74.95% 73.68% 65.67% 67.11% 57.50% 63.48% 72.95% 54.34% 76.59% 75.17% 80.37% 65.95% 68.03% -1.98% 5.32% 2.55% -4.06% 1.33% 0.22% 6.69% 0.29% 0.92% 19 17 22 6 18 21 28 31 32 23 25 48 26 37 27 49 30 35 46 20 Badgett Bate Baseline Booker Brady Carver______ Chicot Cloverdale Dodd Fair Park Forest Park Franklin Fulbright Garland Geyer Springs Gibbs Ish Jefferson King________ Mablevale McDermott 3 3 3 6 3 6 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 4 3 6 4 3 5 3 3 Mary Golston Levanna Wilson Mary Jane Cheatham Dr. Cheryl Simmons Mary Menking______ Mary Guinn Otis Prester Frederick Fields Barbara Means Virginia Ashley Franklin Davis Mac Huffman Robert Brown Eleanor Cox Donna Davis Stan Strauss Francis Cawthon Sadie Mitchell Julie Davenport Mike Oliver 154 248 262 345 275 329 350 291 183 192 198 352 225 233 177 191 182 204 48 62 74 269 111 262 177 71 121 49 242 50 296 17 105 134 5 273 0 11 3 7 12 7 8 4 0 2 4 9 6 0 11 0 6 202 321 339 621 398 598 535 366 243 444 411 530 256 282 336 187 483 278 275 219 220 3 14 500 509 257 401 390 656 467 613 558 492 328 351 376 544 540 346 328 353 0 492 728 515 517 126 222 262 324 255 319 352 304 177 198 197 293 244 182 182 168 0 206 371 310 251 52 62 71 262 131 257 136 78 94 67 254 34 269 3 118 0 280 202 172 0 12 6 11 14 7 5 7 5 5 3 6 17 21 4 9 0 4 7 3 15 178 296 339 597 400 583 493 389 276 270 454 333 530 206 266 295 0 490 580 485 -28 -26 0 -21 -20 -10 2 13 -6 6 -1 -59 19 -51 5 -23 -182 2 371 32 -24 4 0 -3 -7 20 -5 -41 7 -27 18 12 -16 -27 -14 -25 -16 -5 7 202 -47 17 0 1 3 4 2 0 -3 3 5 3 -1 -3 8 15 4 -2 0 -2 7 0 1 -24 -25 0 -24 2 -15 -42 23 -28 27 10 -78 0 -50 -16 -41 -187 7 580 -15 -6 -11.88% -7.79% 0.00% -3.86% 0.50% -2.51% -7.85% 6.28% -9.21% 11.11% 2.25% -18.98% 0.00% -19.53% -5.67% -12.20% -100.00% 1.45% 76.24% 77.26% 77.29% 55.56% 69.10% 55.02% 65.42% 79.51% 60.20% 79.01% 44.59% 85.64% 42.45% 91.02% 62.77% 56.85% 97.33% 42.24% 70.79% 75.00% 77.29% 54.27% 63.75% 54.72% 71.40% 78.15% 64.13% 73.33% 43.39% 87.99% 46.04% 88.35% 68.42% 56.95% -5.45% -2.26% 0.00% -1.28% -5.35% -0.30% 5.98% -1.36% 3.93% -5.68% -1.20% 2.34% 3.58% -2.67% 5.66% 0.10% -3.00% -1.18% 55.60% 54.03% 42.04% 63.97% 63.92% 49.90% -0.20% 8.32% -4.13%Prepared by The Office of Desegregation Monitoring Based upon information furnished by the LRSD Little Rock School District Enrollment Comparison Oct 1 1992 vs Sept 71993 Day after Labor Day 2 School Principal 33 34 50 38 39 36 40 41 47 51 42 52 29 43 44 45 Meadowcliff Mitchell Offer Creek Pulaski Hts. Rightsell Rockefeller Romine Stephens Terry______ Wakefield Washington Watson Western Hills Williams Wilson Woodnrff 3 4 3 3 4 4 5 4 3 ? 5 3 3 6 3 3 Jerry Worm Samuel Branch Carolyn Teeter Lillie Carter Sharon Davis Anne Mangan Lionel Ward Lonnie Dean La Dell Looper Willie Morris Karen Buchanan Teresa Courtney Dr. Ed Jackson Gwen Ziegler Pat Higgenbofham Totals for Elementary Schools Black 92-93 292 232 143 198 239 250 277 202 238 347 483 332 209 275 265 147 9073 White 92-93 147 28 203 173 9 104 74 / 286 147 332 117 124 218 90 83 4947 Other 92-93 1 4 7 8 1 7 10 0 17 6 7 2 ____2j 9 0 4 201 Total 92-93 440 264 353 379 249 361 361 209 541 500 822 451 335 502 355 234 14221 Capacity 442 346 351 351 346 425 467 298 492 492 939 492 328 517 394 324 16256 Black 93-94 294 205 130 192 182 237 233 139 242 322 450 365 209 240 259 143 8785 White 93-94 134 18 195 199 4 93 68 3 290 107 261 86 117 211 89 82 4816 Other 93-94 1 2 6 11 1 8 14 r ___26 6 12 0 3 10 4 5 271 Total 93-94 429 225 331 402 187 338 315 143 558 435 723 451 329 461 352 230 13872 Black Diff 2 -27 -13 -6 -57 -13 -44 -63 4 -25 -33 33 ____0 -35 -6 -4 -288 White Diff -13 -10 -8 26 -5 -11 -6 -4 4 -40 -71 -31 -7 -7 -1 -1 -131 Other Diff 0 -2 -1 3 0 1 4 1 9 0 5 -2 1 1 4 1 70 Total Diff -11 -39 -22 23 -62 -23 -46 -66 17 -65 -99 0 -6 -41 -3 -4 -349 Total % Diff -2.50% -14.77% -6.23% 6.07% -24.90% -6.37% -12.74% -31.58% 3.14% -13.00% -12.04% 0.00% -1.79% -8.17% -0.85% -1.71% -2.45% 92 Black Percent 66.36% 87.88% 40.51% 52.24% 95.98% 69.25% 76.73% 96.65% 43.99% 69.40% 58.76% 73.61% 6239% 54.78% 74.65% 62.82% 63.80% 93 Black Percent 68.53% 91.11% 39.27% 47.76% 97.33% 70.12% 73.97% 97.20% 43.37% 74.02% 62.24% 80.93% 63.53% 52.06% 73.58% 62.17% 63.33% Percent Diff 2.17% 3.23% -1.23% -4.48% 1.34% 0.87% -2.76% 0.55% -0.62% 4.62% 3.48% 7.32% 1.14% -2.72% -1.07% -0.65% -0.47% Totals for the School District 16589 9026 404 26019 16032 8347 478 24857 -557 -679 74 -1162 -4.47% 63.76% 64.50% 0.74%Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 Date: September 29, 1993 To: From: Subject: Nancy Acre, Faith Donovan, and Joyce Underwood Horace Smith and Connie Hickman Tanner, ODM Associate Monitors Dunbar Enrollment and Recruitment This memo is to confirm our meeting on Friday, October 8,1993 at 10:00 a.m. We are very interested in your magnet programs success, since it was designed to help desegregate Dunbar. At this time we will be looking for answers to a variety of questions regarding your recruitment efforts and results. We will also need certain documentation. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Please bring copies of the following information to our meeting on the Sth. Enrollment Data: October 1 magnet program enrollment by grade, including race and gender, for the 1990- 91 school year October 1 magnet program enrollment by grade, including race and gender, for the 1991- 92 school year October 1 magnet program enrollment by grade, including race and gender, for the 1992- 93 school year October 1 magnet program enrollment by grade, including race and gender, for the 1993- 94 school year October 1 total school enrollment by grade, including race and gender, for the 1993-94 school year The number of new students by grade, including race and gender, enrolled in your program for the 93-94 school year The number of students by grade, including race and gender, who withdrew from the magnet program since the 1992-93 school yearRecruitment Data: The number of LRSD students recruited by grade, including race, gender and where they were recruited, during the 1992-93 school year The number of private school students recruited by grade, including race and gender, during the 1992-93 school year The number of PCSSD students recruited by grade, including race and gender, during the 1992-93 school year The number of any additional students recruited by grade, including race and gender, and where they were recruited during the 1992-93 school year Documentation of all recruitment strategies and activities - For example, if you developed a brochure name the person(s) responsible for the brochure, identify your targeted audience (ie. white sixth grade PCSSD students at Lawson, Baker, Romine), state the date it was distributed, report how much was budgeted for the brochure and distribution and how much it actually cost, and explain how you tracked your results. If you made a presentation, include the person responsible, type of presentation, date, location, sign-in sheets and explain how you tracked your results.Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 Date: September 29, 1993 To: From: Subject: Clell Watts and Joyce Stiedle Horace Smith and Connie Hickman Tanner, ODM Associate Monitors Henderson Enrollment and Recruitment This memo is to confirm our meeting on Thursday, October 7,1993 at 10:00 a.m. We are very interested in your magnet programs success, since it was designed to help desegregate Henderson. At this time we will be looking for answers to a variety of questions regarding your recruitment efforts and results. We will also need certain documentation. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Please bring copies of the following information to our meeting on the 7th. Enrollment Data: October 1 total school enrollment by grade, including race and gender, for the 1992-93 school year October 1 magnet program enrollment by grade, including race and gender, for the 1992- 93 school year October 1 total school enrollment by grade, including race and gender, for the 1993-94 school year October 1 magnet program enrollment by grade, including race and gender, for the 1993- 94 school year The number of new students by grade, including race and gender, enrolled in your program for the 93-94 school year The number of students by grade, including race and gender, who withdrew from the magnet program since the 1992-93 school yearRecruitment Data: The number of students recruited who live in Hendersons attendance zone by grade, including race and gender, during the 1992-93 school year The number of private school students recruited by grade, including race and gender, during the 1992-93 school year The number of PCSSD students recruited by grade, including race and gender, during the 1992-93 school year The number of any additional students recruited by grade, including race and gender, and where they were recruited during the 1992-93 school year Documentation of all recruitment strategies and activities - For example, if you developed a brochure name the person(s) responsible for the brochure, identify your targeted audience (ie. white sixth grade PCSSD students at Lawson, Baker, Romine), state the date it was distributed, report how much was budgeted for the brochure and distribution and how much it actually cost, and explain how you tracked your results. If you made a presentation, include the person responsible, type of presentation, date, location, sign-in sheets and explain how you tracked your results.ST) f u-t Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 376-6200 Fax (501) 371 -0100 Date: September 29, 1993 To: From: Subject: Rudolph Howard and Dorthy McDonald Horace Smith and Connie Hickman Tanner, ODM Associate Monitors Central Enrollment and Recruitment This memo is to confirm our meeting on Friday, October 8,1993 at 1:40 p.ra. We are very interested in your magnet programs success, since it was designed to help desegregate Central. At this time we will be looking for answers to a variety of questions regarding your recruitment efforts and results. We will also need certain documentation. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Please bring copies of the following information to our meeting on the Sth. Enrollment Data: October 1 magnet program enrollment by grade, including race and gender, for the 1990- 91 school year October 1 magnet program enrollment by grade, including race and gender, for the 1991- 92 school year October 1 magnet program enrollment by grade, including race and gender, for the 1992- 93 school year October 1 magnet program enrollment by grade, including race and gender, for the 1993- 94 school year October 1 total school enrollment by grade, including race and gender, for the 1993-94 school year The number of new students by grade, including race and gender, enrolled in your program for the 93-94 school year The number of students by grade, including race and gender, who withdrew from the magnet program since the 1992-93 school yearRecruitment Data: The number of LRSD students recruited by grade, including race, gender and where they were recruited, during the 1992-93 school year The number of private school students recruited by grade, including race and gender, during the 1992-93 school year The number of PCSSD students recruited by grade, including race and gender, during the 1992-93 school year The number of any additional students recruited by grade, including race and gender, and where they were recruited during the 1992-93 school year Documentation of all recruitment strategies and activities - For example, if you developed a brochure name the person(s) responsible for the brochure, identify your targeted audience (all white PCSSD junior high students, private school students, and LRSD junior high students), state the date it was distributed, report how much was budgeted for the brochure and distribution and how much it actually cost, and explain how you tracked your results. If you made a presentation, include the person responsible, type of presentation, date, location, sign-in sheets and explain how you tracked your results.Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 Date: September 29, 1993 To: From: Subject: Jodi Carter and Steve Garrett Horace Smith and Connie Hickman Tanner, ODM Associate Monitors McClellan Enrollment and Recruitment This memo is to confirm our meeting on Thursday, October 7, 1993 at 1:30 p.m. We are very interested in your magnet programs success, since it was designed to help desegregate McClellan. At this time we will be looking for answers to a variety of questions regarding your recruitment efforts and results. We will also need certain documentation. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Please bring copies of the following information to our meeting on the 7th. Enrollment Data: October 1 total school enrollment by grade, including race and gender, for the 1992-93 school year October 1 magnet program enrollment by grade, including race and gender, for the 1992- 93 school year October 1 total school enrollment by grade, including race and gender, for the 1993-94 school year October 1 magnet program enrollment by grade, including race and gender, for the 1993- 94 school year The number of new students by grade, including race and gender, enrolled in your program for the 93-94 school year The number of students by grade, including race and gender, who withdrew from the magnet program since the 1992-93 school yearRecruitment Data: The recruitment committee roster by race, gender, and position Recruitment committee agenda and minutes A list of all recommended recruitment strategies developed and implemented by the recruitment committee Recruitment training documentation,including the person(s) responsible, topic,location, time, sign-in sheets, and evaluation criteria The number of students recruited who live in McClellans attendance zone by grade, including race and gender, during the 1992-93 school year The number of private school students recruited by grade, including race and gender, during the 1992-93 school year The number of PCSSD students recruited by grade, including race and gender, during the 1992-93 school year The number of any additional students recruited by grade, including race and gender, and where they were recruited during the 1992-93 school year Documentation of all recruitment strategies and activities - For example, if you developed a brochure name the person(s) responsible for the brochure, identify your targeted audience (all white PCSSD junior high students, private school students, and LRSD junior high students), state the date it was distributed, report how much was budgeted for the brochure and distribution and how much it actually cost, and explain how you tracked your results. If you made a presentation, include the person responsible, type of presentation, date, location, sign-in sheets and explain how you tracked your results.Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 October 20, 1993 Sue Pederson LRSD Student Assignment 501 Sherman Little Rock, AR 72202 Dear Sue: As we discussed today, I anticipate receiving the following information from you by Wednesday, October 27,1993: October 1, 1992 four-year-old enrollment by school, including race and gender Information on where each of these children are as of October 1,1993 (For example, are they currently enrolled in a kindergarten class at the school where they were enrolled in a four year old class, have they transferred to another LRSD school, and if so which one, or have they left the LRSD.) I will be out of the office until October 26,1993. If you have any questions, please call me on the 26th at 376-6200. Sincerely, Connie Hickman Tanner Associate MonitorOffice of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 Date: October 26, 1993 To: Donna Grady Creer From: Melissa Guldin Subject: Magnet School Enrollment In reviewing the 1993-94 enrollment figures for the Little Rock School District, I noted that none of the magnet schools is filled to capacity and some have enrollments significantly below their maximum. In order to complete monitoring of this years enrollment, I will need some information from the Magnet Review Committee. Please provide the number of unfilled seats at each of the six original magnet schools. In addition to identifying empty seats by school, also indicate the number of vacancies attributed to each school district, and whether the empty seats are reserved for black or white students. I have included a chart that you may wish to use in order to simplify the reporting process. Since the information requested is part of an ongoing monitoring project, I would appreciate receiving the figures as soon as possible. Thank you for your cooperation.The Number of Unfilled Magnet Seats as of October 1,1993 School LRSD NLRSD PCSSD TOTAL Black White Black White Black White Black White Booker Carver Gibbs Wiliams Mann Parkview- A A 1^- Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 Date: November 1, 1993 To: From: Subject: Anne Mangan and Pat Price Connie Hickman Tanner, ODM Associate Monitor Rockefeller Magnet Program Enrollment and Recruitment This memo is to confirm our meeting on Monday, November 15,1993 at 11:00 a.m. ODM is very interested in your magnet programs success, since it was designed to help desegregate Rockefeller. At this time I will be looking for answers to a variety of questions regarding your recruitment efforts and results. I will also need to review certain documentation. Please bring copies of the following information to our meeting on the 15th. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 376-6200. Eorollment Data: October 1 magnet program enrollment by age level, including race and gender, for the 1989-90 school year October 1 magnet program enrollment by age level, including race and gender, for the 1990-91 school year October 1 magnet program enrollment by age level, including race and gender, for the 1991-92 school year October 1 magnet program enrollment by age level, including race and gender, for the 1992-93 school year October 1 magnet program enrollment by age level, including race and gender, for the 1993-94 school year The number of new children by age level, including race and gender, enrolled in the magnet program as of October 1,1993 The number of children by age level, including race and gender, who withdrew from the magnet program between the 1992-93 school year and the 1993-94 school yearRecruitment Data: The number of children recruited to Rockfellers magnet program by age level, including race, gender, and where they were recruited, during the 1992-93 school year Documentation of all recruitment strategies and activities during the 1992-93 school year and those planned for the 1993-94 school year Examples: A. If a strategy involves developing a brochure: name the person(s) responsible for its development and distribution
provide a copy of the brochure, if it has been completed
identify the audience targeted to receive the brochure (day care centers, PCSSD children, private school students, and targeted LRSD students), state the brochure distribution dates
identify the amount of money budgeted for the brochures development and distribution, the total expenditures to date, and any remaining budget expenses
and explain how you will track your results. B. If an activity involves a presentation: identify the persons(s) responsible for developing and making the presentation
identify the audience targeted for the presentation
briefly describe the type of presentation, including the date and location
provide copies of participant sign-in sheets
and explain how you will track your results.>1 1-1 Little Rock School District RSCSIVFD November 24, 1993 NOV 2 9 1993 Cr:c3 or Desi3
c'nsl
o
i fZo
Mrs. Ann Brown Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 E. Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building LittleRock, AR 72201 Dear Mrs. Brown
Thank you for your letter of November 9, 1993. Obviously, I did not use October 1, 1993 enrollment figures in reporting to the Board. Instead, I attempted to give an updated report which I thought included enrollees since October 1. Please be assured that the information supplied to your office regarding October 1 enrollment by this District is correct. We will be updating the Board as it relates to enrollment trends at Washington Magnet School. Again, thank you for your assistance. Sincerely yours. Larry S. Robertson cc
Estelle Matthis 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)374-3361Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown. Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376.6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 November 19, 1993 Mr. Larry S. Robertson Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, ?\R 72201 Dear Larry: At the districts Board of Education meeting last night, 1 heard you and Estelle Matthis answer the boards questions about the number of students attending Washington Magnet and the schools racial balance. The board also asked about the number of Washington M-to-M students and how the schools total 1993-94 enrollment compared to that of the previous year. You told the board that Washingtons enrollment was 765 and its racial distribution was within the desegregation plans racial balance mandate of between 60% and 40%. ODM annually compiles enrollment data based on the October 1 figures reported to the State by the three Pulaski County school districts. The attached chart reflects Washingtons October 1 enrollment data for the last five school years, information which the LRSD furnished ODM. Note that Washingtons 1993-94 enrollment is 721, 101 fewer pupils than the previous year, and that the schools racial balance is 63% black, a proportion that places the school in violation of the desegregation plan. Our records also indicate that 106 M-to-M students presently attend Washington, 69 of them from PCSSD and 37 from NLRSD. We phoned Washington this morning to see if there had been some recent influx of children into the school that would account for the 765 total you reported to the board last night. We were told that the school presently has 722 students enrolled, 63% of whom are black. Because ODM is an arm of the Federal Court, 1 necessarily place a great deal of emphasis on the accuracy of all information given us by the school districts. If ODMs October 1 enrollment information on Washington is incorrect, please immediately furnish me with the accurate figures. If, however, you agree that our records are correct, 1 trust you will immediately supply Mrs. Matthis and your Board of Directors with accurate data on Washington so they can make decisions based on sound information. Sincerely yours. in S. Brown Enc. CC: Estelle Matthis FIVE YEAR ENROLLMENT COMPARISON Using October 1 Enrollment Washington Elementary School 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Washington Elem Black 510 438 480 483 451 White 313 356 332 260 Other 11 10 Total 519 762 841 822 721 % Black 98 57 57 59 63 8 1 5 7 Prepared by ODM based on information supplied by LRSDAikansas Democrat (gazette WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 20,1993 Public school rolls plunge by 1,933 in county BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazette Education Writer Enrollment in the three Pulaski County school districts has dropped dramatically this year by 1,933 students compared to last year, according to the official Oct. 1 enrollment reports the districts submitted to the state Department of Education. Nearly all 1,885, or 97.5 percent of the missing stu- dents are white. The loss of students has significant financial implications for the districts. The bulk of the decrease occurred in the Pulaski County Special School District, where enrollment fell by 1,207, from 21,633 to 20,426. Little Rock School District enrollment also dropped by a significant number, 618, from 26,212 to 25,594. North Little Rock School Dis- trict enrollment fell by 108, to 9,085. The decrease represents 3.4 percent of the total enrollment in the three districts last year. "If I had to give my best guess, I would say the drop has to do with the instability of school assignments, Eddie Collins, assistant superintendent for pupil personnel in the county district, said Tuesday. r Collins said parents have voluntarily called or sent letters to explain why they left the system. Many said they went elsewhere when they were unable to send their children to neighborhood schools because of overcrowding. When a schools enrollment reaches capacity, surplus children are assigned to more dis- See SCHOOLS, Paqe 16A Schools NLR enrollment PCSSD enrollment School 1992 1993 Continued from Page 1A tant schools. Some parents chose not to accept the assignment, Collins said. Estelle Matthis, deputy superintendent of the Little Rock district, said Tuesday that administrators are making student recruitment a priority this year. The emphasis will be on showcasing each individual school and the district, educating the public on the choices available in the district, and making the enrollment process user- friendly," she said. She said the enrollment decline resulted from a number of factors, including uncertainty last summer about leadership at Central High and in the district superintendency, and a perception that the schools are unsafe. Statistics show that the number of weapons and firearms found in the schools declined last year. Matthis said district officials need to get the message out about school safety, and the good programs and students in the schools. Matthis said the district will contact parents who have left the schools to solicit suggestions for improvement. District officials said Tues- The county district lost day that the loss of more than 1,144 white and 63 blacks, ac- ' ............. Elementary Alternative Amboy Baring Cross Belwood Boone Park Central Crestwood Glenview Indian Hills Lakewood I School 1992 1993 1b1el % Black iblal % Black Elementary iblal SBisch Total % Black Lynch Drive Meadow Park LRSD enrollment School 1992 1993 20 70 390 44 14 36 171 42 450 61 468 54 241 44 230 57 447 45 277 51 464* 48 243 51 North Heights 403 48 Park Hill Pike View Redwood Seventh St. Total_____ Secondary Alternative Baring Cross 210 45 429 49 239 60 363 49 5.058 50 30 77 31 71 Lakewood Md. 545 46 Ridgeroad Md. 578 46 Rose City Md. ... _. NLRHS-East 1,339 45 408 51 NLRHS-WesI 1,204 44 Total Grand total 4.135 46 9,193 48 25 52 380 51 13 46 168 45 441 62 429 60 251 45 237 54 387 44 255 52 449 54 264 56 418 47 276 46 370 50 210 62 338 46 Adkins Arnold Baker Bales Bayou I Cato Moto 4 911 52 66 70 35 71 539 40 544 53 366 51 1.419 46 1.205 44 4.174 46 9,085 49 College Stetlon Crystal HHI Dupree Fuller Harris Jacksonvltle Landmark Lawson Oak Grove OakbfCK>ke Pino Fores! Pinewood Robinson Scott Sherwood Sylvan HOIs Taylor Tolleson Total Secondary 420 36 390 17 283 27 680 45 648 1 650 21 326 33 603 36 458 23 524 57 546 40 847 27 518 46 321 14 469 24 592 18 518 20 682 28 420 25 191 35 490 24 735 18 420 26 569 24 12.300 28 411 37 348 23 294 25 599 45 649 1 569 22 277 40 746 43 428 22 473 60 479 47 763 31 498 46 304 16 438 24 600 21 434 21 580 31 411 24 147 34 450 27 685 23 388 31 532 24 11.503 30 Elementary Ibtal % Black BadgeH Bale Baseline Booker Brady Carver Chicot Cloverdata Dodd Fair Park Forest Park Franklin Fulbrighi Gariand Geyer Springs Gibbs Ish Jefferson King Mebelvats McDermott Meadowdlff Mitchell Otter Creek 202 76 321 77 339 77 621 56 398 69 598 55 535 65 366 60 304 60 243 79 444 45 411 86 530 42 256 91 282 63 336 57 187 97 463 42 500 56 509 54 440 66 264 88 353 41 Iblal %Blacl 189 70 303 74 343 77 595 397 54 66 595 55 509 70 388 79 292 65 263 76 458 44 34S 87 520 45 205 88 288 72 299 57 504 42 553 65 488 64 509 51 434 71 230 93 Adult Learning Ctr, 66 24 Fuller Jacksonville N. Jacksonville S. 935 45 654 26 602 34 Jacksonville Hi. 1,023 29 Combined 1992 enrollment lor Lynch Drive and Rose City Elementary Schools. students. The Oct. 1 report showed a decrease of 84 students compared to the enrollment on the eighth day of school this year. The eighth-day figures showed a loss of 682 students compared to the eighth day last year. MUIS N. Pulaski Northwood Oak Grove Robiruon Jr. Robinson HI. Sylvan Hills Jr. Sylvan Hills HI. Tbtal Qrarxl total 627 44 837 22 939 25 915 23 411 27 408 26 932 25 935 46 9.284 31 21.584 29 949 43 594 31 566 36 967 30 671 48 838 21 948 23 869 25 485 27 354 25 919 26 796 26 8.858 30 20,361 30 Pulaski Heights 379 52 Highlsell Rc^efeller Romlne Stephens Terry Wakefield Vfeshinglon Watson Western Hills Williams WBson Woodruff Total_______ Secondary 249 96 361 69 361 77 209 97 541 44 500 69 822 59 451 74 335 62 502 55 355 75 234 63 14,221 63 341 398 189 340 334 145 561 447 721 442 332 41 48 97 71 74 97 43 75 63 80 65 472 54 354 75 236 62 14 017 cording to the statistics. The Little Rock district lost 566 whites and 52 blacks and the North Little Rock district lost 175 whites but gained 67 black students. Thirty percent of the pupils in the county district are black and 70 percent are white or are of other races. The county districts enrollment was 30 percent black and 70 percent white. Last year the enrollment was 28 percent black. The district lost 903 students at the elementary level and 300 in the secondary schools. The fact the district lost a 1,200 students seemed high but the figures were the most accurate they had. The Little Rock district remains the largest in the state. The black enrollment in the district grew by 1 percent to 65 per- cent black, after remaining stable at 64 percent since 1989. ficial Oct. 1 enrollment fell from 9,193 last year to 9,085 this year. The districts racial composition is nearly 50-50 black and white. Whites make up 50.6 percent of the enrollment, while blacks make up the remaining 49.4 percent. The Oct. 1 enrollment total is considered the official enrollment for the schools. While it is not the number used to determine state funding for a district, it does have implications for the state aid. Central Fair Han McClellan Parkview Cloverdale Dunbar 1,999 59 905 64 994 57 985 67 871 58 775 74 705 58 1.879 65 918 976 65 60 886 75 Foreel Heights 787 70 Henderson Mabelvale Mann 914 75 667 66 849 59 Pulaski Heights 774 58 Southwest Iblal Special Grand Total 695 75 11.920 64 71 39 26,212 64 . 788 701 701 788 915 654 851 790 679 11.526 51 25.594 59 81 63 73 74 69 58 55 77 67 53 65 Elementary enrollment in If the numbers are accurate, Little Rock fell by 204 students they could cost the three disand the secondary school enrollment dropped by 414. Matthis attributed the secondary school drop in part to a small class moving into the 10th grade this year. The class is small as the result of the con- --------------------- .XX..V troversialcohtrolled-choicestu- large number of students this dent assignment plan in the mid year became evident in the - early September enrollment reports. However, the loss at the time did not exceed 1,000 1980s, she said. That plan resulted in a large enrollment decline at the time. In North Little Rock, the of- tricts together over $4 million in future years up to $3 million for the county district, as much as $1.5 million for the Little Rock district and about $264,000 for the North Little Rock district. The financial losses would not hit the already financially strapped districts all in one year, though. Dr. Robert Shaver, associate director for finance in the state Department of Education, said Tuesday that a relatively new state law allows districts that are losing students to collect state aid based on their average student enrollment for the last three years. That would cushion the loss, especially if enrollment can be increased in subsequent , years. / Traditionally, state aid to | school districts is not based on J the Oct. 1 enrollment but on a formula that uses the average enrollments for the first three quarters of each school year. Each school year consists of four nine-week grading periods . or quarters.Arkansas Democrat (gazette WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 20,1993 NLR enrollment PCSSD enrollment School 1992 1993 School 1992 1993 LRSD enrollment Elementary Total % Black Total %.BIack| Elementary School 1992 Total % Black Total % Black 1993 Elementary Total % Black Total % Black Alternative Amboy Baring Cross Belwood Boone Park Central Crestwood Glenview Indian Hills Lakewood Lynch Drive Meadow Park North Heights Park Hill Pike View Redwood Seventh St, Total________ 20 70 390 44 14 .. 36 171 42 450 61 468 54 241 44 230 57 447 45 277 51 464* 48 243 51 403 48 210 45 429 49 239 60 363 49 5,058 50 25 52 380 51 13 46 168 45 441 62 429 60 251 45 237 54 387 44 255 52 449 54 264 56 418 47 276 46 370 50 210 62 338 46 4,911 52 Secondary Alternative Baring Cross Lakewood Md. Ridgeroad Md. Rose City Md. 30 77 31 71 545 46 578 46 408 51 NLRHS-East 1,339 45 NLRHS-West 1,204 44 Total Grand total 4,135 46 9,193 48 66 70 35 71 539 40 544 53 366 51 1,419 46 1,205 44 4,174 46 9,085 49 Adkins Arnold Baker Bates Bayou Meto Cato - College Station Crystal Hill Dupree Fuller 7 Harris Jacksonville Landmark Lawson Oak Grove Oakbrooke Pine Forest Pinewood Robinson Scott Sherwood Sylvan Hills Taylor Tolleson Total Secondary 'Combined 1992 enrollment for Lynch Drive and Rose City Elementary Schools. 420 36 390 17 283 27 680 45 648 1 411 37 348 23 294 25 599 45 650 21 7 326 33 603 38 458 23 524 57 546 40 847 27 518 46 321 14 469 24 592 18 518 20 682 28 420 25 191 35 490 24 735 18 420 26 569 24 12,300 28 649 1 569 22 277 40 746 43 428 22 473 60 479 47 763 31 498 46 304 16 438 24 600 21 434 21 580 31 411 24 147 34 450 27 885 23 388 31 532 24 11,503 30 Adult Learning Ctr. 66 24 Fuller Jacksonville N. Jacksonville S. Jacksonville Hi. Mills N. Pulaski Northwood Oak Grove Robinson Jr Robinson HL Sylvan Hills Jr. Sylvan Hills Hi. Total Grand total 935 45 654 28 602 34 1,023 29 627 44 837 22 939 25 915 23 411 27 408 28 932 25 935 46 9,284 31 21,584 29 949 43 594 31 566 36 967 30 571 48 838 21 948 23 869 25 485 27 354 25 919 26 798 26 8,858 30 20,361 30 Badgett Bale Baseline J... Booker ' Brady Carver Chicot Cloverdale Dodd Fair Park Forest Park Franklin Fulbright Garland Geyer Springs Gibbs Ish Jefferson King Mabelvale McDermott Meadowdiff Mitchell 3, Otter Creek Pulaski Heights Rightsell Rockefeller Romine -fd:.
' ' Stephens Terry Wakefield - - 202 76 321 77 339 77 621 56 398 69 598 55 535 65 366 80 304 60 243 79 444 45 411 86 530 42 256 91 282 63 336 57 187 97 483 42 500 56 509 54 440 66 264 88 353 41 379 52 249 96 361 69 361 77 209 97 541 44 5004 69 Washington
822 59 Watson Western Hills. Willfama: 451 74 335 62 ______ '.'502 55- Wilson fe-,, Woodruff 7 Total______ ^.355:<75 234' 63 14,221 63 Secondary Central Fair , Hall McClellan:'
Parkview Cloverdale Dunbar: Forest Heights Henderson Mabelvale Mann ' Pulaski Heights Southwest Total Special Grand Total 1,999 59 905 64 994 57 - 985 87 871 58 775 74 ... 705 58 3T.737 70 914 75 667 66 849 59 774 58 695 75 11,920 64 71 39 26,212 64 189 303 343 70 74 77 595 54 397 595 66 55 509 70 386 292 263 458 345 520 205 288 79 65 76 44 87 45 88 72 299 57 504 553 488 509 434 230 42 65 64 51 71 93 341 41 398 189 48 97 340 - 71
334 74 145 561 447 721 442 332 97 43 75 63 80 65 472 54 354 236 14,017 1,879 918 976 886 788 701 701 788 915 654 851 790 679 11,526 51 25,594 75 62 64 65 65 60 75 59 81 63 73 74 69 58 55 77 67 53 65Tension, fear drive some from Central I I BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazette Education Writer 1 Whitney Singleton, Rachelle Rexer and Mike Lierly were sophomores at Little Rock Central High School last year. But, like dozens of other white Cen-' tral students, the three left the school and are attending classes elsewhere. Centrals official Oct. 1 enrollment dropped this year by 120 students to 1,879 from 1,999 last year. The white enrollment decline was even greater, 143 students, but that was offset by a slight increase in black enrollment. Central was no fun last year, Singleton, a junior at North Little Rock High School, said in an interview. Students were hostile to each other, and some of the teachers felt threatened by their students. There was some tension and fear. But Rexers reasons for leaving Central, also to at- See ENROLLMENT, Page 12A I { I12A SUNDAY. NOVEMBER 7, 1993 Enrollment Continued horn Page 1A lend North Lillie Rock High, were different. She said her de- LRSD eiimlltfteHt sutyey dj/iion was based on conve- nience and family tradition her brother went to North Lit- de Rock High. Concerns about safely or other conditions at Central were not factors in her decision, she said. In fact, she misses some things about Cen- ii al for instance, playing the viola in the schools orchestra and the diverse student body. Bobbi Lierly said her son Mike transferred lo North Lillie Rock High because he wanted to lake a two-hour commercial art class that was not available at Central, and lo take ad- ' vantage of a seven-period class day that allows students to take iilore elective courses. Central has a six-period day, although if also has an early morning "Zero Hour" class period. I^Belween Oct. 1,1992, and this year, the Little Rock School Dis- (ricl's total enrollment dropped by 618 students 599 of them white. That is bad news for a 65- pErcenl-black district that is struggling to desegregate its vir- thally all-black elementary schools in east and central Little Rock, and maintain racial balances in other schools. t-Dislrict officials are pulling tolellier a comprehensive stu- dfent recruitment plan that ^lould be completed by the end of next month and implement- bd before spring registration. Qhe purpose is to reverse the enrollment decline at Central and dislriclwide. Dr. Russ Mayo, associate superintendent for de- sj^regation, said last week. District officials have talked about tracking students who leR the city's public schools to find Util where they went and why, but that has nol yel been done. *The while enrollment fell al Central pai Uy for demographic i^asons. There are fewer white slydents in the ninth-grade class that moved into 10th grade this year than there were in the 12th- gfade class lliat graduated. Bui some students al the .wbool last year chose lo leave (enlral to atleiul other public High schools such as North Little Rock High, Parkview Magnet High or Hall High. riAt lea.st six Central students I Sr. high Central Fair Hall McClellan Parkview Total Jr. high Cloverdale Dunbar Forest Heights Henderson Mabcivale Mann Pulaski Heights Soutliwest Total Elementary Badgett Bate Baseline Booker Brady Carver Chicot Cloverdale Dodd Fair Park Forest Park Franklin Fulbright Garland Geyer Springs Gibbs Ish Jelferson Mabelvale McDermott Meadowcliff Mitchell Otter Creek Pulaski Heights Rightsell Rockefeller Romine Stephens Teriy Wakefield Washington Watson Western Hills Williams Wilson Woodruff Total Special schools , Grand Total Black 1,228 596 586 666 463 3,539 566 439 575 678 453 494 434 524 4,163 132 225 265 321 263 325 356 304 189 200 200 300 233 181 208 170 213 357 311 262 306 215 141 190 184 240 247 141 243 337 451 353 215 257 263 147 8,945 27 16,674 AsotOc.t /. 1993 While 616 314 362 213 315 1,822 Other 33 8 28 7 10 86 Tola! % Black 1,679 918 976 886 788 5,447 65 65 60 75 59 64 hoods, and even in the same families, to different schools. 'll was a complete zoo. Htilherford said, adding lh.nl llie classes of sludcnls now in niiilli and loth grades were in elementary school at the time and were hit the _______ aiid Fulbright lost lOstiidenls. The 12 schools reported a net gain of 95 while.'? (his year compared lo Iasi year. Of the schools, only Fulbright actually losl white sludcnls, 10, ac- 4'Erc accepted al the new ^jkansa.s School for Malliemat- ica and Sciences in Hot Springs. A'couplc of others moved to - viZa.shington, D.C., with relatives vbho work in President Clinton's adjninislratioii. ^Increased enrollmenl in .<dme of Little Rock's private (Jdlools, including Pulaski Acad- "Tiy and Central Arkansas irislian High School, indicates Il some Little Rock students wr tJSl 41pin(loned public schools. Sim- IJarly, enrollments have Increased in school districts surrounding Pulaski County. J-A recent University of Arkansas at Little Rock study aq population migration showed 'lat 2.3,000 people left Pulaski le'unly between 1980 and 1990, 130 251 195 210 197 341 351 141 1,816 57 68 76 265 122 163 147 75 97 60 253 40 272 3 78 121 287 189 174 232 127 12 195 197 93 73 3 292 106 260 89 114 207 87 84 4,822 23 8,463 "The morale was gone. It seemed like the center was mis-sing. She told of visiting the school before her daughter decided lo attend. Two students had a fistfight in a hallway. 3he staff broke it up and Ihe.stndents, escorted by the principal, apologized to the Singletons and said Ihey hoped their fight hadn't ruined the Singletons' image of Central. Those who left Central and those who stayed cited concerns about safety and security. Central is a large, inner-city .school in a rundown neighborhood. "I had apprehensions about going to Central," said one mother whose daughter is now a Central 10th- grader. It was not so much about the academic quality as it was about safely. mother. The who many of them went to Saline Faulkner counties. Faulkn- -------------- . and Saline counties gained named, said she fi,b00 people in the last decade through migration. * Mary McGehee, an associate demographic specialist at asked not to be planned to bail out if her 5 11 18 27 4 16 5 14 100 0 10 2 9 12 7 6 6 3 5 5 15 21 2 8 7 3 15 1 3 5 11 1 7 14 1 26 4 10 0 3 8 4 5 250 437 701 701 788 915 654 851 790 679 6,079 189 303 343 595 397 595 509 386 292 263 458 345 520 205 288 299 504 z 553 488 509 434 230 341 398 189 340 334 145 561 447 721 442 332 472 354 236 14,017 51 25,594 81 63 73 74 69 58 55 77 69 70 74 77 54 66 55 70 79 65 76 44 87 45 88 72 57 42 65 64 51 71 93 41 48 97 71 74 97 43 75 63 80 65 54 75 62 64 53 65 hardest. In addition to controlled- choice problems, Rutherford said, enrollment was affected by the school districts Iwo-year "crime coma." in Tlie district the early 1990s did not respond quickly enough to escalating violence in the schools. There are 618 while 12th- graders in the Little Rock School District Ibis year, and 600 while llth-graders. In the 10th grade, the number drops lo 572, and in the ninth grade, 539. In the seventh and eighth grades, however, the numbers of whiles arc significanlly higher, 632 and 639. respectively. The largest class of whiles in the district is 718 in the first grade. Skip Rutherford, the father of a Central High lOlh-gradcr and a former Lillie Rock School Board member, Entdllment by race (Llltle Rock School District) Grade White Black Other K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Ungraded Spec, schools 4-year-olds Total 662 1.245 718 1,269 662 1,190 660 1,258 663 1,196 618 1,206 625 1,290 639 1,474 632 1,359 539 1,308 572 1,323 600 1,115 618 61 23 191 955 174 27 285 39 38 29 41 40 23 25 32 29 39 21 33 31 0 1 16 blamed the small ninth and 10th grades on problems from tlie mid-1980s, when the districtimplemented the con- Grand total 25,594 Seuree: LUile Rock School Olsltlel 8,483 16,674 437 cording to the stati.slics. The Enrollment history Year (Central High School) Total enrollment % Black 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1,879 1,999 1,771 1,629 1,863 2,070 65% 59% 61% 60% 60% 57% 1987 ------- 2.108 - 37% 1986 1985 1984 1983 2,088 1,989 1,989 1,947 Source: LIWo Rock School DMIilcI he said. As a result, people leR the public schools. 'Violence got out of hand before the district took steps to increase security officers and assign city police officers to schools, lie said. Rutherford said he and his wife considered private schools for their son a year ago because of their disappointment with the way the district handled security. He said he continues to question the district's coinmitmenl to school safety, but he also said the quality of the academic program al Central is second lo none and that be is pleased with the school and its staff. racial composition i!i the schools 59% 59% 61% 61% ranged from 42 percent black and 56 percent while or other at Jefferson Elementary to 76 percent black and 24 percent while or other nt Fair Park Elementary. In the 11- area schools south of Asher, only Cloverdale, Geyer Springs and Baseline elementaries showed enrollment increases. Cloverdale grew by 20 pupils, Geyer Springs by six and Baseline by four. Enrollment at Chicot, Dodd, Mabelvale, Meadowcliff, Otter Creek, Wakefield, Watson and Western Hills fell by a total of 133 students. Of the H Southwest Little Rock schools, the percentage of black students increased or remained stable in 10. The racial composition at the schools ranged from 41 percent black and 59 percent while or other al Otter Creek Elementary to 80 percent black and 20 perffent Following are other pieces of white or other at Watson misinformation gleaned from the districts enrollment statistics. were 70 percent or more black. mentary. Eight of the schbqls The enrollment fell not : The racial makeup in, the only at Central this year but in j eight junior highs ranged from four of the districts five high | 55 percent black at Pulaski schools. Fair High reported an 1 Heights Junior High to 81- increase of 13 students. | cent black at Cloverdale Junibi Enrollment in the district s High. Cloverdale had the ttbSt incentive schools decreased by dramatic change in the studfeirit 25 percent this yey, fa ling[by ^ody. The school lost 74stu-- dw rhihirpn rrnii 1.937 lo 1.4o4. dents and the percentage, of black students grew from 73'pier- 483 children from 1,937 to 1,4M. Incentive schools gel extra district money for programs lo improve the education of black children and attract whiles to the vir- tually all-black schools. The decrease in the incentive school count was partly a result of the districts decision to close Lsh Incentive Elementary, enrollment 187, but each of Ilie other incentive school."! lost students. Some of the incentive school pupils went lo the new King In- lerdistrict Elementary, which has a black enrollment of 357 pupils, most of whom are from Lillie Rock, and a while enroll- iiicnl of 109 pujiils, many of whom are from the Pulaski County Special School District. Regular noiimagnel, noniii- cenlive area elemenlary schools in the west and northwesl sections of Little Rock (north of Asher Avenue) were more likely to show an increase in enrollmenl cent to 81 percent. Total enrollment in the.Jji^ nior highs fell by 87 students from 6,166 to 6,079. WhiteMft- rollment dropped by 132.'t0- dents, from 1,948 to 1,816. eu liic evil- ----------------- ------- trolled-choice including an increase in while enrollment than schools in desegregation plan. "It was a nightmare that drove over 1,000 people out of the district, Rutherford said other parts of the city. Of the 12 schools, six showed increases in total enrollment and three remained stable. Fair Park, Forest Park, JefTerson, Pulaski Heights, Terry and Woodruff elementaries report- last week. ed increases in total enrollment, "I said back while Brady, McDermott and Wilson remained stable. Bale (JALR, said populations pro- j^tions show the trend will continue.
McGehee also said 43,753 people in Lillie Rock are under 18 years of age. Of that group, 49.2 (Jfercent are white, and the re- ihaiiider. 50.8 percent, are black (jrof oilier races. i^ljltle Rock enrollment num- tiSts showed some signs of hope, ^ludy showed that white en- ijjjlment increased or stabilized ijTSome elementary schools iMstly in west Little Rock. Parots and students who chose to ^(ck with Central, which got a of adverse publicity last year, said in recent interviews dfey dont regret it. daughter did not feel secure at the school, but her daughter ad- justed well. She said her daughter's friends from Pulaski Heights Junior High scaltered
one went to Parkview High School, two others went to Mount St. Mary's Academy and another went lo Hall High. The mother said it angers her as a parent and district patron that she and other parents have to worry about safety in a school. Another key reason for the enrollment decline this year is that Little Rocks ninth- and lOth-grade classes have fewer whites than other grades. Even if Central hadn't generated negative publicity last year, its enrollment might have declined anyway because last years graduating class was replaced by a smaller class of lOth-graders. then that the district would feel the repercussions of controlled choice lost 18 students, Romine lost 27 for years, Rutherford said. It will take a whole generation of students I mean 12 years lo recover from it. We are beginning to see some signs of recovery at some of the elementary schools where white enrollment is up or has stabilized. Rutherford said one of the districts strengths now is Rs stable and predictable student assignment plan that assigns many students to schools in their neighborhoods, but also gives them some choice. In the controlled-choice plan, students were assigned to schools and then given the opportunity to choose other schools. Decisions on transfers were based on racially balancing the schools. A persons residence had no connection to the school assignment. Al the time, parents complained that the plan senl children in the same neighbor- 5^he drop in white enrollment ^-Central, from 761 to 618, caused a striking change in the a&iools racial composition. For fifyears, the racial makeup at t^ntral hovered around 60 per- eent black, 40 percent white. TKIs year it shot up to 65 per- <*4it black and down to 35 percent white, as compared to 59 percent black and 41 percent white last year. '.The suspension of former Central Principal John L. Hiek- mpn Jr. in January and resulting furor concerned parents, some of whom moved their chil- di^n out of the school. Hicknian w^s suspended and not rehired based on allegations of sexual and financial misconduct. His suspension was highly publicised and bitterly divisive among students, staff and parents. After he left, things seemed to^o downhill, Carolyn Sin- gleton. Whitneys mother, said.The district is following our obligation to phase out Grandfathering, whereby students were allowed to remain in their current school, whether or not the school was the Attendance Zone school. Because of this effort, many Incentive School students have elected to go to their Attendance Zone school. This effort resulted in a total increase of 165 students in our incentive schools in August of 1994 over the October 1993 student count. This increase occurred with one (1) less Incentive School in 1994-95 than in 1993-94. The Little Rock School District also has moved toward actively and aggressively recruiting students to our district. During the 1993-94 school year, a districtwide recruitment plan was written to address requirements in the desegregation plan, court orders, as well as monitoring reports. The document includes plans for incentive, area, magnet and interdistrict schools. As part of the districtwide recruitment plan, each school is required to have an individual recruitment plan and a school recruitment team to implement activities in their plan. Recruitment efforts for Clinton Elementary, Pulaski County Special School Districts new interdistrict elementary school, were extremely successful. More than 200 Little Rock School District students were part of the desegregation exchange and will now attend Clinton Elementary. LRSDs four-year-old program continues to grow and serve parents of preschool children in preparing them for kindergarten. With the addition of eight more classes, the district enrolled 695 students in the program for the 1994-95 school year, an increase of 203 students over last year . The Little Rock School District will continue to comply with every aspect of our Desegregation Plan. 9CENTRAL SUBTOTAL KG TOTAL FAIR SUBTOTAL KG TOTAL HALL SUBTOTAL KG TOTAL McClellan SUBTOTAL KG TOTAL PARKVIEW SUBTOTAL KG TOTAL TOTAL SR TOTAL SR/KG SUBTOTAL Little Rock School District Enrollment Count Octobers, 1994 1101 Ungraded 10 11 12 Black White Other Total Black % #08 Ungraded 10 11 12 #02 Ungraded 10 11 12 #72 10 11 12 nos Ungraded 10 11 12 6 389 291 305 991 49 1040 0 204 141 203 548 0 548 0 16 18 15 6 100.00% 609 450 523 49 1588 0 63.88% 64.67% 58.32% 62.41% 49 100.00% 49 1637 63.53% 21 245 190 162 818 13 631 7 66 110 93 276 3 279 0 28 3 314 0 300 4 259 7 901 0 16 7 917 75.00% 78.03% 63.33% 62.55% 68.59% 81.25% 68.81% 19 266 199 178 662 7 669 19 276 205 164 664 20 684 0 135 137 148 420 15 435 4 105 112 92 313 13 326 7 77 61 58 203 0 203 0 117 117 94 328 0 328 3355 1668 104 16 3459 1684 Office of Desgregation Page 1 0 10 11 15 23 381 322 285 36 1011 0 20 36 1031 82.61% 69.82% 61.80% 62.46% 65.48% 35.00% 64.89% 0 4 2 4 10 0 10 0 17 7 13 37 0 37 26 357 268 226 877 73.08% 77.31% 76.49% 72.57% 75.71% 20 100.00% 897 0 269 261 255 785 76.25% 50.19% 52.49% 58.04% 53.50% 15 100.00% 800 54.38% 139 5162 0 120 64.99% 86.67% 139 5282 65.49%CLOVERDALE JR TOTAL DUNBAR TOTAL Little Rock School District Enrollment Count October 3, 1994 ms Ungraded 7 8 9 #07 Ungraded 7 8 9 FOREST HEIGHTS 1109 Ungraded 7 8 9 4 161 179 177 521 2 46 30 41 119 0 3 1 3 7 6 210 210 221 647 66.67% 76.67% 85.24% 80.09% 80.53% TOTAL HENDERSON #13 Ungraded 7 8 9 TOTAL MABEL VALE JR #16 Ungraded 7 8 9 TOTAL MANN MAGNET 1103 Ungraded 7 8 9 TOTAL PULASKI HEIGHTS P10 Ungraded 7 8 9 TOTAL SOUTHWEST JR iH1 Ungraded 7 8 9 TOTAL SUBTOTAL 0 172 175 121 468 0 79 80 68 227 0 7 4 1 12 0 258 259 190 707 66.67% 67.57% 63.68% 66.20% 10 179 187 189 565 8 65 64 60 197 0 2 12 4 18 18 246 263 253 780 55.56% 72.76% 71.10% 74.70% 72.44% 22 223 222 194 661 2 80 76 71 229 0 11 11 5 27 24 314 309 270 917 91.67% 71.02% 71.84% 71.85% 72.08% 15 130 136 136 417 0 151 157 148 456 10 172 123 126 431 20 145 170 152 487 4006 6 37 50 68 161 0 139 114 113 366 4 101 126 103 334 1 27 30 47 105 1738 Office of Oesgregation Page 2 0 1 2 4 7 0 9 7 7 23 0 2 3 1 6 0 7 7 18 118 21 168 188 208 585 0 299 278 268 845 14 275 252 230 771 21 179 207 203 610 5862 71.43% 77.38% 72.34% 65.38% 71.28% 50.50% 56.47% 55.22% 53.96% 71.43* 62.55* 48.81* 54.78* 55.90* 95.24* 81.01* 82.13* 74.88* 79.84* 68 34%BADGETT TOTAL BALE P4 K TOTAL BASEUNE TOTAL BOOKER TOTAL BRADY TOTAL Little Rock School District Enrollment Count October 3,1994 1)119 Ungraded P4 K 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 0 0 6 100.00% 20 12 16 9 24 11 16 19 133 Ungraded 1 2 3 4 5 6 5 19 25 34 28 19 29 31 24 214 1(^22 Ungraded P4 K 1 2 3 4 S 6 Ungraded K 1 2 3 4 S 6 Ungraded P4 K 1 2 3 4 5 6 3 23 44 31 30 33 27 24 30 245 }^6 36 42 41 40 48 48 48 305 ^18 2 8 45 35 35 24 38 35 32 254 5 0 25 80.00% 8 0 20 60.00% 8 0 0 4 0 24 13 28 66.67% 69.23% 85.71% 6 0 17 64.71% 2 7 44 6 14 13 12 13 8 11 3 7 87 1 13 12 7 13 3 12 6 8 77 32 37 28 39 30 40 39 245 1 9 27 27 17 23 13 11 9 137 Office of Desgregation Page 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 8 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 4 3 5 5 4 2 2 2 23 0 0 6 4 1 0 1 1 17 18 26 177 11 35 38 48 43 28 41 34 31 309 36 58 38 43 37 40 32 38 326 73 84 74 83 80 90 89 573 3 17 78 66 56 48 51 47 42 408 88.89% 73.06% 75.14% 45.45% 54.29% 65.79% 70.83% 65.12% 67.86% 70.73% 91.18% n.42% 69.26% 75.00% 63.89% 75.86% 81.58% 69.77% 89.19% 67.50% 75.00% 78.95% 75.15% 52.05% 50.00% 55.41% 48.19% 60.00% 53.33% 53.93% 53.23% 66.67% 47.06% 57.69% 53.03% 62.50% 50.00% 74.51% 74.47% 76.19% 62.25%CARVER TOTAL CHtCOT TOTAL Little Rock School District Enrollment Count Octobers. 1994 Ungraded K 1 2 3 4 S 6 Ungraded P4 K 1 2 3 4 5 6 CLOVERDALE ELEM Ungraded P4 K 1 2 3 4 S 6 TOTAL DODD TOTAL Ungraded K 1 2 3 4 5 6 FAIR PARK TOTAL Ungraded P4 K 1 2 3 4 5 6 11121 0 31 35 42 46 52 51 52 309 11128 9 9 36 51 47 48 51 47 46 344 19131 0 34 44 42 39 41 29 35 48 312 itf32 10 27 26 24 19 33 29 25 193 11123 0 18 27 32 25 29 25 25 23 204 Office of DwgrffgatKXi Page 4 0 26 29 41 42 46 45 36 267 15 7 21 16 19 17 16 19 21 151 0 12 13 14 11 8 7 3 6 74 1 9 18 19 9 14 17 10 97 0 15 11 13 8 10 3 8 5 73 0 2 3 0 3 2 0 2 12 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 8 0 1 2 1 0 1 1 0 0 6 0 0 2 3 0 1 2 0 8 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 5 0 59 67 83 91 100 96 92 586 24 18 42 67 66 66 68 69 66 503 47 59 106 52 53 105 43 54 392 11 36 47 46 31 79 53 41 296 36 38 45 33 40 28 34 28 282 52.54% 52.24% 50.60% 50.55% 52.00% 53.13% 56.52% 5X55% 37.50% 50.00% 85.71% 76.12% 71.21% 7X73% 75.00% 68.12% 67.65% 68.39% 72.34% 74.58% 39.62% 75,00% 77.36% 27,62% 81.40% 88.69% 79.59% 90.91% 75.00% 55.32% 50.00% 61.29% 41.77% 54.72% 60 98% 64.77% 50.00% 71.05% 71.11% 75.76% 7X50% 89 29% 73.53% 6X14% 72.34%FORESTPARK TOTAL FRANKUN TOTAL FULBRIGHT TOTAL GARLAND TOTAL Little Rock School District Enrollment Count October 3.1994 Ungraded K 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ungraded P4 K 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ungraded K 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ungraded P4 K 1 2 3 4 5 6 GEYER SPRINGS Ungraded P4 K 1 2 3 4 5 6 TOTAL ltf24 0 0 0 23 33 36 38 30 18 20 196 1^5 12 46 99 49 37 42 36 36 34 393 F48 2 34 34 39 26 36 35 29 235 ill26 6 15 33 31 26 35 30 35 35 246 ^7 0 23 31 37 31 30 18 32 21 223 37 36 33 23 37 36 26 228 4 21 7 2 1 Q 3 1 2 41 4 41 38 29 40 39 50 48 289 1 0 0 3 0 1 1 2 1 9 0 11 7 10 11 6 8 9 4 66 Office of Oesgregation Page 5 0 1 1 0 2 1 1 6 1 5 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 9 1 3 2 2 2 4 2 2 18 0 3 6 3 5 2 3 3 2 27 0 3 4 2 1 0 1 0 0 11 60 70 70 61 69 55 47 432 17 72 107 51 36 42 40 40 36 443 1 78 7A 70 66 79 37 79 542 7 18 39 37 31 38 34 40 38 282 0 37 42 79 43 36 27 41 25 300 38.33* 47.14* 51.43* 62.30* 43.48* 32.73* 42.55* 45.83* 70.59* 63.89* 92.52* 96.08* 97.37* 100.00* 90.00* 95.00* 94.44* 88.71* 28.57* 43.59* 45.95* 55.71* 36.24* 45.57* 36.71* 43.36* 85.71* 83.33* 84.62* 83.78* 83.87* 92.11* 88.24* 87.50* 92.11* 87.23* 62.16* 73.81* 46.84* 72.09* 83.33* 66.67* 78.05* 84.00* 74.33*GtBBS TOTXU. JEFFERSON TOTAL MLK TOTAL Little Rock School District Enrollment Count Octobers, 1994 Ungraded K 1 2 3 4 S 6 Ungraded K 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ungraded P4 K 1 2 3 4 5 6 4MSfZ.U4Z. ELEM Ungraded P4 K 1 2 3 4 5 6 TOTAL MCDERMOTT Ungraded K 1 2 3 4 5 6 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 19 24 24 20 25 23 25 160 5 21 36 24 32 31 34 35 218 0 32 57 44 45 27 42 32 30 309 ilf46 9 9 46 47 45 46 48 47 43 340 ^20 0 25 36 33 36 35 42 34 241 17 17 18 14 21 18 16 121 2 36 37 46 39 48 30 41 279 0 31 34 23 26 28 23 34 28 227 0 8 11 16 13 15 21 16 24 124 0 30 35 32 34 33 35 34 233 Office of Desgregatton Page 6 2 3 2 2 1 2 0 12 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 5 0 3 4 2 1 1 2 2 0 15 0 1 1 2 3 0 2 0 1 10 0 3 2 6 2 3 3 1 20 38 44 44 36 47 43 41 293 7 58 74 71 71 79 66 76 502 0 66 95 69 72 56 67 68 58 551 9 18 58 65 61 61 71 63 68 474 0 58 73 71 71 71 80 69 494 50.00% 54.55% 54.55% 55.56% 53.19% 53.49% 60.96% 54.61% 71.43% 36.21% 48.65% 33.80% 45.07% 39.24% 51.52% 46.05% 43.43% 48.48% 60.00% 63.77% 62.50% 48.21% 62.69% 47.06% 51.72% 56.08% 100.00% 50.00% 79.31% 72.31% 73.77% 75.41% 67.61% 74.60% 63.24% 71.73% 43.10% 49.32% 46.48% 50.00% 49 30% 52.50% 49.28% 48 79%MEAOOWCUFF TOTAL MITCHELL TOTAL OTTER CREEK TOTAL Little Rock School District Enrollment Count October 3.1994 Ungraded K 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ungraded P4 K 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ungraded K 1 2 3 4 S 6 0 0 0 0 41 19 0 60 68.33* 49 42 47 39 31 30 219 8 19 36 34 28 26 40 35 34 2!&a F50 9 13 23 25 19 32 19 23 154 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM 1138 Ungraded K 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 29 24 38 26 24 29 27 14 21 22 23 20 12 131 0 0 2 1 1 1 2 1 0 8 0 27 25 22 23 37 34 28 196 0 28 41 34 24 28 25 27 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 2 0 2 1 9 0 2 4 3 0 3 2 2 63 63 69 62 51- 43 411 8 19 38 35 31 28 42 36 35 272 0 40 SO 49 44 69 55 52 359 0 59 69 75 SO 55 56 56 n.78* 66.67* 68.12* 62.90* 60.78* e9.77% 67.88* 100.00* 100.00* 94.74* 97.14* 90.32* 92.86* 95.24* 97.22* 97.14* 95.59* 32.50* 46.00* 51.02* 43.18* 46.38* 34.55* 44.23* 42.90* 49.15* 34.78* 50.67* 52.00* 43.64* 51.79* 48.21* TOTAL 197 207 16 420 46.90% RIGHTSELL TOTAL Ungraded P4 K 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 0 0 0 17 37 20 34 27 35 20 35 225 Office of OatQregation Paga? 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 38 20 35 27 36 20 35 229 94.44* 97.37* 100.00* 97.14* 100.00* 97.22* 100.00* 100.00* 98.25*ROCKEFELLER TOTAL ROMINE TOTAL TERRY TOTAL WAKEFIELD Ungraded K TOTAL WASHINGTON TOTAL Little Rock School District Enrollment Count Octobers, 1994 Ungraded PI P2 P3 P4 K 1 2 3 4 S 6 Ungraded P4 K 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ungraded K 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 F36 0 0 0 5 5 5 7 6 0 1 0 10 10 13 50.00% 40.00% 53.85% 32 16 5 S3 60.38% 32 20 2 54 59.26% 41 X 26 33 24 X 264 ^0 13 18 34 43 24 23 17 28 34 234 0 29 n X 28 40 X X 234 lUSI 0 44 51 45 52 51 43 41 327 #42 7 3 51 80.39% 19 21 10 11 4 124 0 16 14 10 11 10 3 4 5 73 0 46 41 X X 41 X 295 0 12 9 10 9 5 12 16 73 1 1 0 2 0 15 0 2 2 5 1 0 1 2 3 16 0 4 3 6 3 S 7 2 X Q 4 1 2 1 2 2 1 13 50 48 43 37 34 403 13 X X 58 X 33 21 34 42 323 0 79 71 94 75 X 84 7e 559 0 X 61 57 62 X 57 X 413 60.00% 54.17% 76.74% 64.86% 68 24% 65.51% 1X.00% X.00% 68.00% 74.14% 66.67% 69.70% X.95% 62.X% X.95% 72.45% X.71% X.03% 40.43% 37.X% x.00% 42.X% 47.37% 41 .X% 73.X% X.61% 78.95% 83 87% 87.93% 75.44% 70.69% 79.18% Ungraded P4 K 1 2 3 4 5 6 2 1 0 3 X.67% X X X X 47 78 61 48 443 11 22 X X X X 31 31 211 Office of Desgraoation Page 8 5 3 4 6 3 2 6 4 X 52 78 89 95 X 106 X X X7 69.23% 67-95% 61.80% 66 32% 56 63% 73.58% 62.24% 57.83% 64.48%Little Rock School District Enrollment Count October 3.1994 WESTERN HILLS 11129 TOTAL WILLIAMS TOTAL WILSON TOTAL WOODRUFF TOTAL SUBTOTAL GRANO TOTAL Ungraded K 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ungraded K 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ungraded P4 K 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ungraded P4 K 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 0 0 0 29 28 34 26 33 33 32 215 1143 0 31 34 33 36 39 37 40 250 #44 18 9 32 46 29 28 20 35 37 254 #45 0 18 25 25 28 12 11 14 15 148 8900 16365 8 2 39 7436* 14 13 18 14 10 18 95 0 28 32 35 30 28 32 29 214 3 8 11 12 12 13 6 12 6 83 0 16 7 13 14 8 14 8 7 87 4751 8173 Offtca of Oesgregalion Page 9 1 0 1 1 1 1 7 0 1 1 0 3 4 1 0 10 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 3 8 0 2 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 8 43 47 45 48 44 51 317 0 60 67 68 69 71 70 69 474 21 18 43 60 42 41 27 47 46 345 0 36 33 40 43 21 26 22 22 243 400 14051 657 25195 65.12% 72.34% 57.78% 68.75% 75.00% 62.75% 67.82% 51.67% 5075% 48.53% 52.17% 54.93% 52.86% 57.97% 52.74% 85.71% 50.00% 74.42% 76.67% 69.05% 68.29% 74.07% 74.47% 80.43% 73.62% 50.00% 75.76% 62.50% 65.12% 57.14% 42.31% 63.64% 68.18% 60.91% 63.34% 64.95%L Arkansas Democrat THURSDAY, OCTOBER 6, 1994 Little Rock School District Enrollment i 'SS'M SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS SPECIAL SCHOOLS DISTRICT TOTAL SOURCE: uno Rock School District EnroWment 5,447 5,079 14,017 51 25,594 Percent black 85% 88 84 53 _ 85 Enrotlment 5,282 5,882 14,051 38 25,231 Percent black 05% 42 88 Arkansas OMnocral-Gautte Slightly fewer enroll in LR School District Total off 1.4%
racial breakdown static BY OANNY SHAMEER Oemocrai-Gazefle Education Writer The Little Rock School Dis- trict's enrollment dropped slightly compared with a year ago. the official October enrollment count shows. The district, the state's largest, reported having 25.231 students 363 fewer than the 1993-94 count, and a 1.4 percent decrease from 1993-94'.s 25.594. The district's black enrollment remained at 65 percent. The count on the first class day in October is considered the official enrollment for public schools in Arkansas. While it isn't the number used to determine state funding for a district, it does have state aid implications. Neither the North Little black students and 289 fewer white students than a year ago. In other racial categories, the district gained 220 students. At this time last year, black students had decreased by 52 and white students had decreased by 599. Dr. C. Russell Mayo, associate superintendent for desegregation, said Wednesday. Last .year, the district's overall enrollment dropped 618 students from the 1992 1993 school year enrollment count. Little Rock enrollment figures included 540 students who came from the Pulaski County Special School District and North Little Rock School District under majority-to-minority student transfers. The Little Rock district stu- Rock School District nor the Pu- dent assignment office reported laski County Special School 1.507 students who left the dis- District had official enrollment trict for the Pulaski County Spe- figures available Wednesday. ' " ' The information is due at the cial School District or the North Little Rock School Dis- state Department of Education trict under the transfer pro- by Oct. 15. gram. The The Little Rock districts en- majority-to-minority rollment showed 294 fewer transfer program allows stu- dents to cross district lines to aid in desegregation. Mayo said Wednesday that the district is sending 236 more students out of Little Rock under the transfer program than last year. The net decrease in total enrollment would be 127. Mayo said the net decrease was 532 students last year. Central High School, which has an international studies magnet program designed to recruit white students, had 1,637 students overall 242 fewer students than a year ago. Not every student in the school is part of the magnet program. The school had 186 fewer black students and 70 fewer white students than last year. Four of the five incentive schools continued to have high black enrollment. Those schools had only 34 more white students than a year ago.10'07'94 13:39 301 324 2032 L R School Dlst 0001 LirrLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 I' .6 FAX (501) 324-2032 L DATE: TO: /O/ 7/^^ FROM: SENDERS S PHONE SUBJECT: SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: Number of Pages (include cover page Speed. Dial^_____ Fax. Phone Nn-rnl-haT- /DC? 10.07/94 13:40 S3i:il 324 2032 L R School Dlst @002 To: Little Rock School District MEMORANDUM Dr. Henry P, Williams, Saperintendent From. Mayo, Associate Superintendent Date- Subject
October 4.1994 Enrollment Comparison 1993 & 1994 (October 1), Attached is a chart comparing 1993 with 1994 October 1 enrollment. Worth noting are the following items
1. Total enroHmenl for the district decreased but not nearly as much as last year this lime: a) b) The chart indicates a decrease in total enrollment of 363 students. Of that number, we have 236 more M-M transfers out of our district than last year. Therefore, the net decrease in total enrollment is approximately 12~ students. This time last year, the net decrease was 532. The number of black students decreased by 301 while white students decreased by 295. The category of other students increased bj' 221. This time last year, black students had c) d) decreased by 52, white students had decreased by 599, and odter students increased by 33. Change in percent of black students in the district is negligible. The Incentive Schools show an increase in total enrollment of 320. This occurred with one less incentive school. We did add t four^year old program. However, this accounts for only 18 additional students. 2. Changes in enroUment by orgartizationai level varies greatly
a) Junior high schools saw the greatest ORcrease with 21 3. b) High schools decreased by 165. c) Elementary schools increased by 7. Racial balance is mixed depending on the type of school: s) Area Schools : i) Elementary Schools show 16 outside of the range *. a) Schools which have moved 3% or more back toward the range in one year are Bale, Brady, and rate Park. b) Schools which have moved 3% or more away from the range tn one year are Badges, Mableoale (8%), Wakefield, and Wesfem Hills. it) Junior High Schools show 2 remaining out of range this year {Southwest & Cloaerdale}. Southwest, howev^T, is 2.56% further out of range than last year. iii) .High Schools show only 1 remaining out of range {McClellan}. a) Though still within their range. Fair and //<?/,' increased in percent black by more than 3%. Ranges vary by organizational le\'el and appear to the right of the attached chart. Unlike junior high and high schools. Elementary Area Schools have a fixed range of 40%-60% black students (Interdistrict Plan, page 3, In. 9).10-07/94 13:40 SOI 324 2032 L R School Dlst @003 ienry P. P'tllieirsS, Superintendent trollment Compariton 1S93 & J994 (October 3) 4. C: b) Parkview decreased in percent black by 4.38%. b) Magnet Schools (original six), with a range of 50%-55%* black students, are all inside of the range. As of this date, all students on the ivaitir^ list of each magnet since 1991 haue been contacted and offered auailoble seats according to grade level and racial balance. Those contacted inere mostly White. We continue to move through the remaining lists which date beyond three years ago. ,. The chance that these students will take seats is reduced because of the time they These students will be in the upper grades of their have spent in their current schools. respective schools now and may not iwant to change schools. c) Magnet Programs: i) Dunbai^ has a range of 40%-60% and remains outside of the range from last year. Ths school moved 357% more out of range this year to 66.20%. ii) Other magnet programs, except the original six, King,^ and Dunbar, are reflected under area schdols and must comply with the appropriate area school range. d) Interdistrict Schools have a range^ of40%-60%
0 Washington (64-48%) and Romine (72.45%') remain outside of the range. ii) King has moved inside of the range this year. e) Incentive Schools remain racially identifiable. However, Rockefeller has decreased in percent black by 5% over last year bringing it to 63.51 %- An important relationship to notice from the chart is that of capacity to raaal Balance (percent black), in many schools, we cannot have both
a) For example, McClellan H^h School is outside of its racial balance range but has 302 seats leh before reaching capacity-. Because racial balance is a priority of the Plan over capacity, only- non-black students can be assigned there now. One-hundred twenty (120) additional nori- black students must be assigned to bring the school into range. If that were accomplisheo, one additional black student could be assigned for each additional non-black student until capacity was reached. Until those additional non-black students are found, the capacity of the school cannot be reached. similar problem. While some are within their ranges, they are b) A number of schools have a--------------------------- near the top of the range but not at capacity. If addidonal black students requested these schools, we could assign up to the maximum edge of the range. If only black students are assigned however, those schools would never reach capacity either. Some examples of this are King 'interdistrict Magnet. Parkview High School Magnet, and Forest Heights Junior High School. Superintendents Council Interdistrict Plan, page 3. In. 31. 2 S LRSD Plan, page 140, In 23. King must comply with Iftienhstrici School ranges. Intcrdistrict Plan, page 2, In. 10.10-07 '94 13:41 301 324 2032 L R School Dlst 0004 OctOtoiK 1. 1SS3 i i I LKte Rock School Onaiet Enrvllmafit Comparison Octot*/1 1S5X Drff^9ftc* 199^ Cents! HS^ r-eeHS HeUHS 1 g M:CatenHS" PalnwwWS* ! i I ! I 1 S 1 ! 1 .!_ I 2 - - I B * 5 I < ! i 9- I > 12281 S16| 33
18791 6S35%i lOMi i>46i ' 49i 163?! 63S3%{-ia8! -70! I6l-242i -1.82% . I Q. 1891! -254 S96I 314i Bl 916! 64.92% 586 ! 362 ! 28! 976 | 60,04% 66S| 213! 71 8S6| 7517% 7[ gl71 6O.8TM35I 669 ! 325 ! 36! 10311 64 89** 631! 2791 -1 684 i 2C3| IPi aS7! 76.25% 83
-36! Bi 55 4631 3151 loi 76Si 58.76%^ 4351 3281 37i 18 -10! 3| 11 389* 4.85* 1.06% 9^ -37 'Magne: "Sot^Tet^l
35391 1S22I WoIUsmOII ClovmialeJH Sunbar-ZW- 7 L ^^SHoightsJH |i A4aM13le JH UannJJr Pufebtr Hiights 800' 54.3S%{ .2b! 13! 27i 1S| -4.38% 86' 5447! u^7%it MB, 1884
133
5Zg2l 65.49%
-Wl-ISei 63I-1S6! 0.52% 3076! 15071 76j '4^r66.0?^|' 3OT4i 13B| 1021 4482! 57-47*4 -t2i-l5l| 251-177! 5661 13O| 4391 2511 5 n 575! 195I 18 701' 80.74% 701! 6282% 521 468 1191 1.45% 7| 647 | 80.53%! -^Si -11'1 21 -941 -O.a% 7881 7257%! 5 227! 121 707 | 66.20%
29j~-24| ll 6i 3.57% 678! 210
4531 197 i 494! 341 2': 197i IS] 915! 74.10%I 6611 229' 27| TSO! 72.44%S^ 4[ 654 ! 6937% 16! 851! 58.05% 417| 161! 91T| 72.0e%|r' -17! 19! Oi 21 Oi -8! -0.53% 1291! -260 1199! -3C2 ioob! -200 SSS5| -1053 53351 -853 863! -221 8121 -105 8581 -78 " Magnel Program Inoenlnre - iwwdBlnc! 49.11% 7317% AreaHSRaigs 21 -2(7i 7| 535 ! 7128%
-36! -SSP3! -69! 2C2% 456 ! 3S5t 23! ' 645 53.96%g -38
25! 7! -6! -4 06% 9071 10 614! -29 r 4341 251 524' 141
5! 790 i 54.94% 14! 679 ! 77.17% 431! 334! 4871 1IS| 18! s! 7T\ 55.90%! -3| -I7i 11 -19! 0.96% 6101 79.84%|i -37i -oei 4| -63' 266% 8501 745i -5 26 Sul>-T<itl
4163! 18161 IDO
6079 | 68.48% Woment|! 3S69i 1475T 84! 522SI 70.18% 4006! 1733| 118! 5862
6aJ4%|j-lS7| -78i 13!-217: 41.14% 35501 1372| 95! 5017! 70.71 Ssfs 3coke^ itsdf Canrsf" CtJaf CiO'^rdeJe Codd rair Park tdtasiPari: trsnUrT ^.itiKd! C^larKf CeyerSpPnes SXf JefJsrss.i 132j 571 0, r 2251 6^ 10! T~ 265! 76I 1 32H 2SS| 5! 9! 189! eS4% 3C3! 7426% 3431 7726% 53.95% 1331 2141 2451 44
871 771 Qi 177! ' 75.14% li -119i-1(K! 1i:.2l1i Bje% n -13| 0! -12
5.30% 8! 309! 65.29%
-11 i 19! -2) 61 -5.00% ! 263| 1221 121 397! S25% 305 l 243, 25
4! 326 ! 75f5S -20i 11 21 -171 -2.11% 573'i ~53.23%i! -161 -2Q| 14! -22i -0.72% |l' 3251 2551 ! 356! 1471 7! 595 ! 54.62% 2541 137! 171 406 ! 622S%| I 304
189
1' 2EQ! 75! 97! 6! 5091 .94% 7! 385! 76.76% f' SJB! 2o7| 121 5831 52.55%pi^ -91 15i 5! 111 -3.99% 344
1511 312i p~200 ! 253i 300! 40! 61 31 5! 51 i! 2721 15, 1811 2081 3
76
211 21 1701 121 213! 257 r 357! 189! 3Vi} 1 /A I jl 2S7! 2321 i- 31g! 127! 2921 64.73* i 1S3I 263 : 76.05%! ' 204
JI ll 215! 12! 1411 195
RorrvfK- Tsfry iVfiSem Hills Wiissr. WOOCfV{^ Seeds! Sef)091s 737! -127 6391! -529 5541! -524 257] -60 4011 -92 3901 -64 655:' -S3 457! -65 613! -25 6681 -55 492! -lOd 3231 -30 351! -69 51.25% 75.88% Aiea JH Range 4, 5! -7| -207% 4: 2! -Si -1.55% 3031 68.39% g -12! 61 6: S' 5' 61 91 181 el 0.84* 6! 0.04% 8! 4! 74! 571 73
332! 73.59% I 2381 S4.77s^ 2821 7234% j 4321 45.83*1! 4451 87i%t S42I 432e%'r 2S2| 67.a%| 300 ! 74.33% t -11 -1! 0, 2! 41 13| 2! 19| -3.71% -2! -25! 11 -261 217% .57%r~i! .96% 456 j 43.57% 345! 86.96% 520! 44.81% 1^t 226I 3S3' 411 S3i 1! 4! 981 1.76% 2051 8629% 1 246: 288 ! 7222*1 2231 6
299 ! 56.66% 4! 7!' 3! 15! 504 ! 4225% 331 Sl.K* 488! 63.73% 509! 5'.47% 235! 2S9i 9! 27! 65! 11 i 21 17! 3i 22
-1.45% Si 6
6| 77, -1.06% 39i 434! 540! 33 9 1631 121! 2181 2791 309 ! 227! 340, 124! TJ 2S3I S4.6>Kji -10! 5| 502 ' 43..43%i 151 10! I5i -12! 9! I2i 211* Ol 4, -6
-225% 5I -81 1| -2! 1.16% 551
96.08%
-46! 35i 8, -2I -8.46% II 4341 70.51%! 279! 1 -nni Ct /oe
7 a: 5: 230! 3.48% 3411 41.33%' 241
233 ' 20' tlM. 71.73^ 4341 48.7^ 29! -501 7i -14! 8.00% 2501 8' 1541 195: II 4| 411! 67.88% ij'27!' II 51 -151 -2% 4
01 -231 -2S2% 2721 S5.59%
|451 -41 1| 42! 2.11% 190! 1971 111 398 | 47.74% I I97i 2071 3| 359! 42! 13i 7 164! 4' 189! 9735% 3401 70.53% 2251 4i 16! 420! 46.90% 229! S825K|I 41 i II 4i 18! 1S% 7i 10! 5! 22, -0.83% 0! -11 40
0,90% r T L -4- 238! -1S 328| -28 353! -63 432! 10 728' -177 5151 517! 465! 54 298
-23 3511 374
8 45 240! 531 7i '2471 73, 3341 755%| 1411 Si 11 1451 9724*1 2431 292! 251 6611 4322% 3l 3371 106! 4i 4471 75.S% 451! 250
lOi 721! 6255% 353! 891 0! 2641 124| 2341 15 73! 15 ClesRl 403! 6.31% 323 ! 724 241 311 8! 631 -5.06% 234! 2S5i ' 30i 5^l 41.88% -9| 3271' 73'i iSi - 73i Oi 2! -Ill -1.51% Ooae_______ 3i 4| .21 -1.46% 258! '-23 469! -65 4S7| -154 ! '215| 1141 257, 2071 4421 79.86% 332 ! 64.76% 4431 211
340! 811 6' 21S| 95! 413I 79.(8%( -101 -331 91 -341 657
84.48% 379% 515! <92! 44 -7B -8! -491 231 -341 153% 835! -149 Tea! 147! 27l S7i 84
23! 4721 54.45%l! 2501 214! 41 3541 7429% 51 236 ' 6229% 51! 5294% 2541 1481 151 831 871 6! 7! 10! 4271 79.63%ll -131 -6
61 -151 -024% 492! -65 317! 67.32%j 0! -19
4i -15! 3.08% 474! 5274% 61 3451 73.62% 8! 2431 60.91% 0! -7! 9
T 71 21 2! -1.71% Jll 4i 3, 31 -91 -0.57% 71. -1.38* 36! 41.67%
-121 -21 -II -151-1127% Su8-Toauj' S972 ! 4S45
251, 14068! 63.7to| 8915
4772 : 400. 14087
6329%|! -67! -7311481 19
-0.48% >4aM>gnall 78721'3968
218! 12066 : 65J0*A|l 7876 ' 3904! 5431 121Z3I 6437%{ 4! .62I12S! S7I .0.3314 SranO 7oi3<| 16674 1 84S3 i <37125594 1 65.15% 116360 ! 8194! 667 : 252311 64.92%|-294i-2S9'l220!-363i -0.23% 4lAfegneBj| I46t7i^| 376121943! 6S61%
i50! SS32i 540 i2l622i '66.S3%^167l-3l6!lS2i-32l. 0:1^ 328! -n 517! -43 394! .49 3241 -81 T 15717,-1630 13578,-1455 284431-3212 24454 TSCZ 4000% 80.00% Area Stem. Range M_5JC.S O1hc ol Dcwrgrvgatian IsrSWJr /10/19/1995 14:24 5013242281 LRSD STUDENT ASSIGNM PAGE 01 Office of SwdeNT AssiqNMENT SO! SheXMAN UnE Rock, AR 72202 Tdephoxs SO FT24-2272 Fax SO FT24-2281 FAX COVER SHEET DATE fo-h - TO -0 D /v\ Fax NiMba^ FROM 3>'7l'0i o SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. /f NUMBER OF PAGES, INCLUDING COVER 3 10/19/1995 14:24 5013242281 LRSD STUDENT ASSIGNM PAGE 03 /08/93 11:31:46 PAGE - Entry Withdrawal Entry/Withdrawal Coda Description 1 E AR CE DX DO HS XE LR NO NP PO RE FROM PUBLIC SCHOOL IN ARKANSAS CHANGE TO ENTRY RECORD FROM DETENTION FACILITY IN ARKANSAS FROM DETENTION FACILITY OUTSIDE ARKANSAS FROM HOME SCHOOL INITIAL ENROLLMENT THIS YEAR FROM ANOTHER LRSD SCHOOL FROM NON-PUBLIC SCHOOL OUTSIDE ARKANSAS FROM NON-PUBLIC SCHOOL IN ARKANSAS FROM PUBLIC SCHOOL OUTSIDE ARKANSAS RE-ENROXX AFTER EXIT SAME SCHOOL W AO ex DC DF ED EM EP EX EY FL GR XD LT ML MM MO MR NA NE NX or PC PG PS SC SI TI UN VD XH ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST CHANGE TO EXIT RECORD DECEASED ASSIGNED TO A DETENTION FACILITY EXEMPTED BY THE DISTRICT WITHDREW/EMPLOYMENT WITHDREW/EMOTXONAL PROBLEMS EXPELLED BY THE DISTRICT END OF YEAR WITHDREW/FAILING GRADES STUDENT GRADUATED DUPLICATE XD LONG TERM SUSPENSION WITHDREW/ENLISTED IN MILITARY M TO M TRANSFER MOVED TO ANOTHER DISTRICT WITHDREW/MARRIAGE WITHDREW DUE TO NON-ATTENDANCE ON RECORD BUT NOT ENROLLED WXTHDREW/LACK OF INTEREST OFFICIAL TRANSFER WITHIN DISTRICT PEER CONFLICT WITHDREW/PREGNANCY ENROLLED IN A PRIVATE SCHOOL enrolled/post-secondary school WXTHDREW/SERXOUS PERSONAL ILUTESS TRANSFER WITHIN DISTRICT/MOVED WITHDREW/UNIDENTXFIABLE REASON WITHDREW VOLUNTARILY/DISCIPLINE EXIT TO HOME SCHOOL END O F REPORT10/19/1995 14:24 5013242281 LRSD STUDENT LSSIGLM PAGE 02 CORRECTED COPY Linia Rock School District Exit Totals 1994-95 August 22, 1994-June 30, 1995 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS central JA Fair.................... MCCLELLAN PARWEW SUB total JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS CLOVERDALE DUNBAR ~ ^EST HEIGHTS HENDERSON mabelvale" MANN magnet " PULASKI HEIGHTS SOUTHWEST ~ SUB TOTAL AD PC Of ED EM EP' Ex EY PU OR lO i 211 1, 2. t 3' 2 21 i
1 1 2i I MU MM MO MR NA NE Nl OT PC PG P3
3c SI 1 Tl I UM VO I XH I TOT ^1 1. ..J. 1 1 2 7
131 2\ 1: 1 3
EUEMEWTarY SCHOOLS | badoett BAL BASELINE_________ booker MAQNET BRAOY CARVER MAGNET CHICOT CLOVERDALE tX>DD______________ FAIR PARK_________ FOREST PARK ^anklin FULBRIGHT ^RLANO__________ Gg^R SPRINGS GIBBS Magnet jgFFSRSQN KING mabelvale ~ MCDERMOTT MEAOOWCliff MfrCHELL i r t TT 2! "17 + I OTTER CWBSK PULASKI HEIGHTS WQHTSELL rockefeller RQMNE^ STEPHENS TERRY__________ WAKEFIELD WASHINGTON WATSON ^STERN HILLS !^1AM3'magnet ' ^QN WOODRUFF SUB TOTAL f 11 2, i 81 T r, 11 81 9. 15i ( I I 4. I T 1 ii + 1 I !~r.2 'M'
' 1'
8 II -r 7T I I 1 I i J. T 1 T T + 1 I 1 r 17 t t' 7 1, 1 T 6 ' I I I U...7 v I f T 1 I X X 1 I I -t i I Tr 31 1 20 -Lij T I 2: i L_L 1 I t H 11 2 2> T I T I I I H X I 4 t I + 4i 1i I ORAND TOTAL! 27 8/23/M X r 4. f I 18 28i 4 t + + X X II X T + i 7j 4-1 ~7 1' 8 41 i 1 T X J. 4-4. X t I T I T I + T t X X 1' I 1 1 + 1 1 1 + 1 T 117 73' _86 1^: 17' 379 1. "3
431 ........t' 7 54. 129
2 711 37' IOS? 24 1 4.. (..... 3{ f-Hi 1 .1 8 4 11 17
I 17' 1 I 408 88 6^ 91 33: sr^f 32 84 L i 701 I 18^ J 901 J 3S& 1: 1 I 2!^ ^'7 47 2' 1188
This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.