Correspondence

- -re^f RECEIVED JAN 5 1996 Office of Desegregation MonitoringCf^: A'fiMe 4c?. ^f1 1 RECEfv ijpy.nr Little Rock School District JAN 1 2 1996 J Vo ^.->1 Office Of Desegregation Momtcnnr. January 11, 199S Mr. John Walker, Attorney At Law 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Dear Mr. Walker: I am pleased that you are willing to discuss the role of the Advisory Committee For Financial Stability with me. With regard to the Committees role as it relates to making recommendations for specific changes in the Desegregation Plan, there is none. The Committees intent is to merely recommend that the LRSD Board follow a logical process in the development of its budget. We feel that there will be greater public support for additional revenue in the form of a millage, if required, if the public knows that a logical process has been followed and all expense reduction strategies have been examined. Additional revenue in the form of increased taxes should only be sought as a last resort to maintain quality educational programs. I will contact your office today or tomonow to arrange a time for us to visit. Sincerely, rred L. Smith Manager of Support Services FLS:ca cc: Ms. Linda Pondexter Ms. Judy Magness Dr. Henry P. Williams Dr. Russ Mayo Ms. Ann Brown 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)374-3361 Cp. .6en: ,, JOHN w. Walker, p.a. ATTORNEY At Law 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 Telephone (501) 374-3758 FAX (501) 374-4187 RECEIVED .I4N ) 2 1996 Office of Desegregaiicn Morutonny JOHN W. WALKER RALPH WASHINGTON MARK BURNETTE AUSTIN PORTER. JR. via Pacsimila - 324-2146 Mr. Fred Smith Manager of Support Services Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Fred
You indicated that we should talk. I am available at any time to discuss any action which will strengthened the school Hd i1=s5-t1-rr-iirctt- wwiitthhiinn the context of the desegregation ppllaann.. I am not available for any other agenda. At the meeting this morning, you indicated that we were not to discuss the ramifications of the desegregation plan in this committee. I believe that one of the agenda items (points in the process) is "start desegregation plan modification process if required. Another one is "to seek additional revenue, if required". _I do -n-o-t understand how you can recommend cut backs on programs which are desegregation in nature for economic reasons where you have not first sought and been denied additional revenue. There seems to be a presumption that you would be denied additional revenue for desegregation if you sought it. That is not an acceptable premise within the context of the desegregation plan. I look forward to visiting with you in the future regarding this and other matters. I also wish to thank you for providing me with the information regarding past meetings. Very truly yours, ohn W. Walker JWW:js cc: Ms. Linda Pondexter Ms. Judy Magness (Committee Board representative) Dr. Henry Williams Ms. Ann Brown t. City of Little Rock Charles Nickerson City Manager City Hall 500 W. Markham Little Rock. Arkansas 72201-1429 (501)371-4510 FAX # (501) 371-4498 December 22, 1995 COPY J Li Dr. Henry Williams, Superintendent Little Rock School District 810 W. Markham Little Rock AR 72201 JAM 1 8 1996 Office of Desesregaiicn Monnoiiiiy Dear Dr. Williams: a At a recent meeting of the Little Rock Neighborhood Connection organization, there was strong interest to have more detailed presentation of issues related to the Little Rock Public Schools at toe January' meeting of toe m-oup. The Neighborhood Connection is an organization consisting of the Presidents of each of toe'88 orsanized neighborhood associations located throughout the city. The group meets quarterly to discuss a variety of conTmunitv issues and concerns related to neighborhood reviulization. The next meeting has been set for January 20, 1996 and will be devoted totally to public school issues. The meetine wwiillll hbpe bhpellrdl afStt the PCTilt-yt/sc TU niversity Park AA dult TL e-.1is__u_r_e. Center, 6401 W. 12th. A continental. .b reakfast begins at 8:00 a.m. and the meeting begins at 8:30 a.m. The group has set aside two hours for discussion of the key school issues. T1 nhcerrce aarree tfoouurr ssppeecciifriicc aarreeaass ootf ccoonncceerrnn bbyy tthhee nneeiigghhbboorrhhoooodd ccoonnnneeccttiioonn ggrroouupp.. We ask that you have representatives from toe district to address each of toe areas and be prepared for questions and discussion related to toe topics. It would be beneficial if School Board members could also attend. First, there is strong interest in toe Strategic Planning Process that is now being completed by the District. We would like additional information - a-----------------------3------------------------ vuuipittcu uy uic uisirici. we wouiu iiKe aoQitionai mtormation on the process being used, the results and *e direction being set by the District Second, we understand that the School Facility Plan has been completed and that it has been recognized as a valuable product. We would like information about the plan and the implementation strategy. In addition, toere is a great interest in the financial status of the School District particularlv in the years ahead. We ask for a review of the fiscal plan of the District with emphasis on the next five years and whatever implications this may have related to school services and facilities. Finally, there tLcr." L.:___ _ L. J.. ^,,3^ lawsuit. A history of the litigation and the School Districts role in responding would also be very helpful. is strong interest in the status of the desegregation The result of our January meeting- should be an increased level of understanding by Little Rocks neighborhood leaders on a variety of issues related to the public school district There is a strong feeling on behalf of our neighborhood leaders to help the district and to serve and motivate neighborhood associations to be helpful in addressing school district issues and to participate in finding solutions. This is a great opportunity to beain a positive and on-going dialogue between e District and our key neighborhood leaders. We look forward to your participation in this meeting. Please advise if any audio visual or additional equipment is needed. If you have other questions, please call. Sincerely, Charles Nickerson City Manager CN/CC/lm City of Little Rock Office of the Mayor City Hall. Room 203 500 W. Markham St. Little Rock. Arkansas 72201-1427- (501)371-4516 FAX (501) 371-4498 REG COPY January 9, 1996 JAN 1 3 1956 Ms. Linda Pondexter, President Little Rock School Board 502 Green Mountain Dr., #56 Little Rock, AR 72211 Office ci Dessjrstjaiicn ivcnaofing Dear Ms. Pondexter: I personally encourage you to attend a special meeting of the Citys Neighborhood Connection group set for Saturday, January 20, 1996, at University Park Adult Leisure Center, 6401 West 12th Street. The Neighborhood Connection is a recently formed group of neighborhood leaders including the presidents of all organized neighborhood associations. The group has successfully met during the past year and has addressed a wide variety of important community topics. The January session has been established to exclusively address a variety of public school issues. The letter inviting Superintendent Williams to the meeting and outlining the key issues is attached. The morning starts with an informal continental breakfast at 8:00 a.m. with the meeting beginning at 8:30 a.m. As you will note in the letter to Dr. Williams, this is a unique opportunity to continue to build the relationship between neighborhood leaders and the school district and for neighborhood leaders to offer assistance in addressing school/community issues. Neighborhood Connection citizens have requested a presentation on the school districts recently adopted Strategic Plan, and an overview of the districts financial picture. In addition, a detailed review of the newly published facility plan would be helpful. Also, please include any particulars related to school closings and an update on the desegregation plan. We have set aside the morning of January 20, for this session and I look forward to your participation. If we can provide additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Jim Daily Mayor JD/rs Attachment.///co 7 Little Rock School District January 22, 1996 J&N 2 4 >996 Office of To: From: Subj ect: Ann Brown, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring
tV "Linda Young and -Leon Modeste Strategic Plan Facilitators Little Rock School District Strategic Plan In accordance with our telephone conversation, we are responding to your request for an update on the Strategic Plan. We are most grateful to you and your staff for taking the time to read the LRSD Strategic Plan. Also, we deeply appreciate your support and thoughtful comments. There were two specific questions that you were concerned about: First, what are our expectations of funding action plans that are expensive? It is our intention to implement a funding strategy with the support of our advisory committees. We will be seeking a variety of funding sources. However, this is not anticipated for this first year. Second, a response to your request regarding implementation: We are currently making preparations to move into the most difficult part of 'implementation phase". the Strategic Plan, which is the Dr. Williams has assigned key administrators to specific strategies (See Attached). On January 30 and 31, 1996, Dr. Howard Fedema will facilitate the "Mutual Expectations Workshop". At that time the key administrators will began to design their work through the lens of the strategic plan. If you or any of your staff wish to attend the workshops, please feel free to inform us 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)324-2000Response to Strategic Plan page 2 Accountability, time schedules, and quarterly check points will be set in an effort to monitor what progress is being made. In the Fall of 1996, ve will reconvene the over-all planning committee to evaluate the progress of the Strategic Plan during the first year. If you should have additional questions, please feel free to contact us. In fact, if you are interested, we would be willing to meet with you for a more detailed discussion. LY/LEM/dge Attachment cc: Dr. Henry WilliamsResponse to Strategic Plan page 3 Attachment strategy Assigned Administrator #1 Curriculum Gene Parker, Supervisor Communications, English, ESL, and Foreign Languages/ Acting Director of Reading #2 Desegregation Russ Mayo, Associate Supt. of Desegregation #3 Scores Below 50% Victor Anderson, Asst. Superintendent/Secondary #4 Communications Suellen Vann, Director, Communications #5 Community Partnerships Debbie Milam, VIPS Coordinator *6 Personnel Brady Gadberiry, Director Labor Relations #7 Staff Development Sterling Ingram, Director Staff Development #8 Equity Patty Kohler, Director Div. of Except. Children 9 Finances Fred Smith, Manager Support Services #10 Safety JoEvelyn Elston, Director Pupil Sezrvices #11 Technology David Beason, Director Information Services Strategic Plan Facilitators Linda Young, Liaison New Futures/Restructuring Director Leon E. Modeste, Special Asst, to SuperintendentI I If Q UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS REGION VI Arkansas, Louisiana. Mississippi, Oklahoma, Texas 1200 MAIN STREET, ROOM 2260 DALLAS. TEXAS 75202 RECEIVED JAM, 2 6 1996 FEB 51996 Ref
06955012 Office of Deseflregation Moniiomiy Dr. Henry P. Williams, Superintendent Little Rock School District 810 Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Dear Dr. Williams: The Office for Civil Rights (OCR), U.S. Department of Education, has completed its compliance review of the Little Rock School District (LRSD), Little Rock, Arkansas. The compliance review addressed the issue of whether the LRSD discriminates against minority students by failing to identify and place them in its gifted and talented educational programs/classes, on the basis of race, in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. OCR is responsible for enforcing Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VI), 42 U.S.C. 2000d et s^g., and its implementing regulation, at 34 C.F.R. Part 100, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in educational programs and activities receiving Federal financial assistance. The LRSD is a recipient of Federal financial assistance from the U.S. Department of Education, and is subject to the reguirements of Title VI. Our investigation determined that the LRSD is operating under a Federal court order. Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District No. 1, et al., 584 F. Supp. (E.D. Ark. 1984) affirmed 778 F. 2d 404 (8th Cir 1985) . pertinent part, the order addresses the desegregation of the LRSD. In addition, OCR determined that the LRSD along with Pulaski County Special School District No. 1 and the North Little LRSD. 328 In Rock School District were placed under an interdistrict countywide remedial desegregation plan which included a responsibility of all three Our mission is to ensure equal access to education and to promote educational excellence throughout the Nation Page 2 - Dr. Henry P. Williams, Superintendent school districts to increase minority participation in G/T (gifted and talented) programs. II Under the requirements of the Federal court order, there are specific steps outlined and II approved by the Federal court for achieving increases in the number of minority students attending the LRSD. During the investigation, OCR reviewed records of gifted and talented program students as well as the records of students that were identified as potential gifted and talented program students in the district
and reviewed the district's policies and procedures regarding gifted and talented education identification, evaluation and placement. teachers, administrators and parents. OCR also interviewed On the basis of evidence submitted by the LRSD and testimony provided by witnesses, OCR has determined that there exists a significant underrepresentation of minorities in the LRSD's gifted and talented educational programs in 62.5% of the District's schools. Inasmuch as the Federal court maintains jurisdiction in Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District No. 1, et al, supra, and the ongoing nature of the court litigation, OCR has referred the enclosed findings and a list of suggested recommendations to address this area and will defer to the decision of the United States District Court, for the Eastern District of Arkansas, for whatever action it deems necessary. Therefore, OCR is closing this compliance review as of the date of this letter. However, the LRSD is urged to evaluate its identification, evaluation and placement policies and procedures to ensure that the underrepresentation of minority students is not caused by any actions on the part of the LRSD's gifted and talented education placement process that may be discriminatory on the basis of race. Under the Freedom of Information Act, it may be necessary to release this document and related correspondence and records upon In the event that OCR receives such a request, we will request. seek to protect, to the extent provided by law, personally identifiable information which, unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. if released, could constitute an This letter of findings addresses only the issue discussed herein and should not be construed to cover any other issues regarding compliance with Title VI which may exist.Page 3 - Dr. Henry P. Williams, Superintendent Thank you for the cooperation extended to OCR staff during the conduct of this compliance review. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Ms. Page Baird or Mr. Eddie Laney of our staff, at 214/767-9443. Sincerely, Tayl or D. Augus Regional Civil Right Region VI Director J Enclosure cc: Chief State School Officer Ann Brown Metropolitan Desegregation Supervisor Office of Desegregation 201 East Markham Suite 510 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 LITTLE ROCK (ARKANSAS) SCHOOL DISTRICT OCR CASE #06955012 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS I. Overview
The Little Rock School District (LRSD) operates 53 campuses, including 5 II incentive elementary schools (desegregation campuses receiving extra funding), 13 magnet schools (7 elementary, 3 junior high, and 3 high school), and 4 interdistrict elementary schools. According to statistical data provided, the district serves 25,195 students with 4,072 students enrolled in its academically oriented Gifted Education Program (GEP). II. Analysis of GEP Enrollment Utilizing Fisher's Exact Test (FET), OCR's analysis of data provided by LRSD yielded statistically significant underrepresentation of black students when comparing overall student enrollment to GEP enrollment for the 1994-95 school year. Based on 1994-95 data (grades 3-12), 30 (62.5%) of 48 LRSD campus GEP's, were underrepresented for black students (statistically significant) by a projected 860 students. To account for the effects of interdistrict transfer, OCR also conducted a FET on combined student and GEP enrollment for all three districts, which was also statistically significant for underrepresentation of black students, total of 640 students less than expected frequencies. a LRSD Campuses with statistical underrepresentation of black students in the GEP were as follows: Elementary: 21 of 35 campuses were underrepresented for black students. Carver Magnet Fair Park Booker Magnet Forest Park Chicot Fulbright Brady Geyer Spring Gibbs Magnet McDermott Terry Woodruff Jefferson Meadowcliff Wakefield M.L. King Otter Creek Washington Mablevale Pulaski Heights Western Hills Middle Schools black students. 5 of 8 campuses were underrepresented for Dunbar Jr. High Magnet (LRSD Gifted and Talented Magnet) Henderson Mann Jr. High Magnet Mablevale Pulaski HeightsPage 2 - Findings and Recommendations High Schools 4 of 5 campuses were underrepresented for black students. Central High Hall High J.A. Fair High McClellan High OCR found that the LRSD offers academically oriented GEP services for 4,072 identified students (1994-95 data) in grades 3-6 (enrichment, resource rooms) and special GEP classes (e.g.. Advanced Placement, Honors) for grades 7-12. Based on information provided by the LRSD, OCR also found that the LRSD, North Little Rock School District (NLRSD), and the Pulaski County Special School District No.l (PCSD) transfer students across district borders in order to achieve Federal court mandated racial percentages of 45%/55% black/white student enrollment. The LRSD's GEP supervisor indicated that transfer students included GEP students, but no numerical data was provided to OCR on the number or race but of transfer students. Based on 1994-95 student enrollment, OCR found statistically significant underrepresentation of black students enrolled in the GEP and in the number of black students versus white and other race students nominated for GEP evaluation. However, OCR did not find a statistical significant racial disparity among nominees who were placed following evaluation. The data suggests that black students may be screened out at the referral level. As the referral data provided did not include information on the referring party, OCR was unable to determine if the underrepresentation in referrals was due to low teacher versus parent referrals or both. Documentation provided by the district for 1994-95 for sample schools indicated that 93.6% of referrals occurred at level). the elementary level and 6.4% at the junior high (secondary level). This documentation also revealed that the majority of elementary children referred are from grade 2 (approximately 2/3's). Based on the information reviewed, OCR concludes that the LRSD had written criteria to identify students for GEP services, and that these criteria .were neutral and non- discriminatory on face with regard to race/ethnicity. AtPage 3 - Findings and Recommendations the elementary level, the review revealed that the GEP criteria consists of a standardized achievement test with a screening score cutoff at the 50th percentile level Stanford Achievement Test Sth Edition (SAT-8), the Torrence Test of Creative Thinking (TTCT), a standardized creativity test, . teacher referral checklist form, and grades
occasionally, scores on a non-verbal ability test Raven's Progressive Matrixes Test (Raven's) were also utilized. At the junior high level, the criteria were the same except for a different standardized creativity instrument, Williams Divergent Thinking Test from Creativity Assessment Package (CAP/DT). a OCR found that the LRSD utilized a 50 percentile cutoff score on selected SAT-8 subtests in screening GEP candidates. OCR reviewed the 1994 mean "Complete Battery" scores of students districtwide on the SAT-8 which revealed a large racial disparity among scores, with black students scores at roughly half of white students' scores. At all grade levels from 1-11, black LRSD students average SAT-8 percentile scores below 50 percentile on the complete battery. OCR found limited validity and reliability data for the creativity instruments. Stronger validity and reliability data were available for the SAT-8, which was reviewed for racial bias by a panel of minority educators. The Evaluation Assistance Center-West (EAC) funded by the U.S. Department of Education advised that a (I band width" rather than fixed cutoff score for the SAT-8 would take into account the standard error of measurement for the instrument. Information provided by the EAC suggests that the non-verbal ability test may be the most effective of the program's standardized criteria for identifying culturally and linguistically diverse students. III. Recommendations TESTING TkND ASSESSMENT OCR recommends that a review of the standardized criteria used in the GEP identification process be conducted. especially in the use of a fixed cutoff It is score. further suggested that all standardized instruments be reviewed to determine if empirical data support the validity and reliability of the use of the tests for the purpose ofPage 4 - Findings and Recommendations gifted and talented student identification. It is further recommended that the District(s) evaluate the ethnic composition of the norming sample to determine whether it is reflective of the District's student population and to ascertain whether the test manufacturers have attempted to control for racial bias, particularly with regard to the creativity instruments. Finally, the District(s) is advised to monitor the performance of its students by ethnic group on standardized instruments used for GEP identification. NOTIFICATION AND DISSEMINATION OF GEP INFORMATION Documentation reviewed and statements of LRSD staff and parents indicated that dissemination of GEP information to parents is primarily limited to cursory information in general District brochures. The LRSD did provide documentation of GEP parent in-services at some schools. However, documentation and parent interviews suggested that these in-services tended to target the parents of children who had already been referred rather than parents whose children had not been referred. Interviews with a random sample of black and white parents suggested parental awareness among the majority of both groups
however, white parents were more likely to report having had a child referred to the GEP. few parents were aware of the Also, program's identification criteria. However, OCR concludes that there is no pattern of differential treatment based on race with regard to dissemination of GEP information. program It is recommended that the following recommendations be considered: 1. Disseminate GEP information to parents whose children have not been previously referred for identification, including information on the criteria for GEP placement
2 . Conduct outreach to local minority organizations to increase awareness of the GEP and the characteristics of gifted children
and 3 . Provide training to all district administrators, counselors, teachers, and School Based Committee (SBC) members regarding the characteristics of giftedne students, including culturally diverse students. ss in training should also address the non-discrimination provisions of Title VI. ThePage 5 - Findings and Recommendations Based on the findings in this review, OCR determined that black students are significantly underrepresented in the LRSD's GEP. The district is urged to evaluate its referral, identification, evaluation and placement policies and procedures and make whatever changes are necessary to ensure that this underrepresentation is not caused by any steps in the Gifted and Talented placement process that may be discriminatory on the basis of race. To assist the District in evaluating the Gifted Education Program and increasing minority participation in the program, OCR is providing the following resources funded by the Department of Education in assessing the impact of referral and evaluation processes on the participation of black students in the GEP: Evaluation Assistance Center- West 121 Tijeras NE, Suite 2100 Albuquerque, NM 87102 (505) 242-7447 Fax (505) 242-7558 Intercultural Development Research Association (IDRA) (Desegregation Assistance Center--South Central Collaborative Services) 5825 Callaghan Rd, Suite 350 San Antonio, Texas 78228 (210) 684-8180 Fax (210) 684-5389 Director: Mr. Bradley ScottOffice of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown. Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 February 14, 19% Dr. Russ Mayo Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Russ: In an Order dated July 10, 1992, the Court adopted the recommendations of ODM which were contained in the Incentive Schools Monitoring Report of June 1992. On page five of that report, we recommended that the district "Identify the factors that are working to make Rockefeller a desegregated school and adopt or adapt them for the other incentive schools." Tlie same recommendation has appeared in subsequent ODM monitoring reports, and has also been discussed by Judge Wright during hearings. As the district is poising itself to consider changes in the desegregation plan, and perhaps particularly in the incentive schools, it seems especially important that we know the results of the districts analysis of the factors that have worked to desegregate Rockefeller. Tlierefore, please immediately forward to me the results of the districts identification of the Rockefeller success factors. Also explain how the identification process was conducted, including when it was undertaken, who participated in it, the analysis criteria and methods used, and how the results have been applied to the other incentive schools. Tltank you very much for your assistance. Sincerely yours. LG.!*___ Ann S. Brown CC: Hank Williams Chris HellerOffice of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor March 5. 1996 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 Dr. Henry P. Williams Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Uttle Rock, AR 72201 Dear Hank: Im perplexed by some of the comments attributed to you in an article entitled, "LRs Latest School Crisis-Henry Williams," which appeared in the March 1 edition of the Arkansas Times. Im well aware that the media sometimes dont accurately capture the statements or intentions of the interviewee. However, if the article is accurate, 1 want to set the record straight about certain points you made, which Ive enumerated below. 1. The writer reports that you complained about needlessly prolonging the case by tying up district money in court-ordered programs that make meaningful improvements impossible. To illustrate such a regressive "court-ordered" program, you were quoted as citing the example of teaching Spanish in the incentive schools. You and 1 are both aware that the desegregation plans were not authored by the Court, but by the Little Rock School District and the other parties, who appealed the Court to approve those plans. Thus, the desegregation programs are court-approved, rather than court-ordered, a fact judge Wright has frequently stressed. It was the LRSD-not the Court-which promised Spanish to incentive school children and their parents. That fact squarely places with the school district the responsibility for both creating and fulfilling the various desegregation commitments. 1 do agree with your comment that teaching Spanish in the incentive schools has "never been done," a failure we have repeatedly brought out in our monitoring reports. 2. You chose to tell the reporter that you had once written a letter directly to judge Wright. You were quoted as saying that 1 told you that you shouldnt do that again. My records reflect that, in the late fall of 1994, you had in fact written three letters to Judge Wright, all of which she forwarded to me to handle, as is her custom. 1 contacted your attorney, who was unaware that you had written to the judge, asking him to diplomatically remind you of judge Wrights policy of refraining from ex partie communication with the parties. By asking your attorney to tactfully reiterate to you the judges policy of participating only in on- the-record communication, my intention was to be as discreet as possible, hoping to spare you embarrassment. That was also the reason 1 had never publicly revealed that you had privately written to the judge.Page Two March 5, 1996 3. Tlie most puzzling and disturbing assertion in the article is your claim that "[ODM] never really talks to us before issuing their reports.'II Not only do we routinely talk to your representatives before issuing our reports, we also talk with them before we even begin a monitoring project. At that time, we explain our monitoring guide and procedures so the district will know exactly what to expect before we ever begin. Tlien, after completing our site visits, interviews, and examination of documents, we review a draft of our findings with your representatives to provide an opportunity for discussion, clarification, and any needed correction. Im sure youll recall having participated in such a session in my conference room during August of 1994 with Russ Mayo, Sterling Ingram, Margaret Gremillion and others, along with me and my staff. At that meeting, we reviewed with you a draft of ODMs report on involvement in the principal selection process. You yourself did not challenge any of our findings in that report nor express any dissatisfaction. Im sure you share my frustration about reading inaccurate reports in the newspaper, and that you understand my desire to correct misrepresentations. Sincerely yours, Ann S. Brown cc: Board of Directors CAtris 51- Ci Little Rock School Disikict APR 't^ iviQyQoA OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT Office of Osssgrogaion vioiikar.ng April 15, 1996 Walter I lussman Publisher Arkansas Democrat-Gazette P. O. Box 2221 Little Rock, AR 72203 Dear Walter: Public education has been, and will continue to be, an important concern among residents of this community. It is critical, therefore, that dialogue exists between educators and the community. It is equally important that media representatives meet periodically with educational leaders to discuss the issues which we must address. In fact, the Tri-District Desegregation Plan calls for regular meetings between a media coalition and the superintendents of the three public school districts. I would like to invite you, or your representative, to meet with Bobby Lester, Pulaski County Special School District Superintendent
James Smith, North Little Rock School District Superintendent
and me on Wednesday, April 24, at 8:30 a.m. The meeting will be held in the Board Room of the Little Rock School District Administration Building, 810 West Markham. I look forward to meeting with you, other media representatives, and the other local superintendents. Sir/cerely, :< :nry P. Williams superintendent of Schools cc: Bobby Lester James Smith 810 WcNl Miirkhatn Sirvcl l.ltUc R<x:k, ArkajisaH 72201 (501)321-2(X)0 4- -1 Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 4Pft d J 1996 April 18, 1996 Office of Desegregation Woniioring TO: All Little Rock School District Personnel FROM: Linda Young, Internal Coordinator, Strategic Planning ,^S>c^on Modeste, Internal Coordinator, Strategic Planning THROUGH: enry r. Willi: s, Superintendent of Schools RE: Questions Following the April 5th Strategic Planning Update As promised, we are providing responses to the questions and thoughtful concerns that were articulated by staff members across the district following the closed circuit telecast about strategic planning. We are very pleased with the interest in and positive comments about our district-wide effort to ensure continued success for our students into the 21st century. What follows is a response by Dr. Williams to your questions. We encourage each of you to continue to think about the strategies addressed through our strategic planning effort and to become involved in the work that must be done to ensure that our mission becomes our reality. Again we encourage you to become involved by volunteering to serve on one of the numerous stratgic planning teams that are currenly being formed. Listed below are the lead administrators responsible for the implementation of the strategic plan. Please feel free to contact us or any of the strategy leaders if you wish to become involved. Leon Modeste, Internal Coordinator Linda Young, Internal Coordinator 324-2011 324-2112 I Strate^ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Title Core Curriculum Standards Implement Desegregation Plan Students Testing Below 50% Communication Plans Community Partnerships______ Personnel Policies Staff Development____________ Equitable Delivery System Financial Stability____________ School Safety_________________ Use of Technology Leader | Gene Parker Russ Mayo Vic Anderson Suellen Vann Debbie Milam Brady Gadberry Sterling Ingram Patty Kohler Fred Smith JoEvelyn Elston David Beason Telenhone # 324-0510 324-2429 324-2005 324-2020 324-2297 324-2118 324-2130 324-2190 324-2003 324-2162 324-2056Little Rock School District Strategic Planning Update April 18, 1996 Follow Up Questions And Answers Is it really possible by the year 2001 for average student performance for every identified sub group to be at or above the 75th percentile as measured by standardized tests? Those of us who have taken a course in measurements and statistics have probably come away from that experience believing that this objective is impossible to achieve. Why? The answer is simply because of the nature of statistics. But, the strategic planning committee wanted to set objectives that would really stretch us and force us to grow into a new way of thinking about what can happen for students. This objective is a desired objective. Our hope is that through the strategic planning effort -all of us- administrators, teachers, and support staff-will come together to create an optimum learning environment for all students. The intent of this environment will be to nurture all of our students in ways that encourage them to achieve their personal maximums. The strategic planning committee has identified ambitious strategies for moving the district toward realization of this objective. Specifically, strategies 1, 3, 7, and 8 address comprehensive systemic changes designed to accomplish this through standards for curriculum and assessment, innovative strategies for improving below grade level performance, staff development, and site-based management. Finally, do I believe that the intent of this objective is obtainable? Yes - absolutely. As we work together throughout the district, building on a common belief system, we can achieve our mission. Student behavior and discipline issues in our classrooms and schools remain major concerns for most of us. Where among the twelve strategies are these concerns addressed? These concerns are actually addressed throughout the entire strategic plain. However, they are explicitly addressed in strategy 10 which focuses on the development and implementation of actions aimed at restoring public confidence in the safety and security of our schools. These actions include providing ongoing conflict resolution training and skiU development for our 1 students
improving behavior and safety on school buses and at bus stops
controlling access to school buildings, grounds and events
implementing a staff development plan for all personnel to hilly understand safety policies and procedures
developing and enhancing a system of communication among schools, administration, and the public regarding issues of safety and security
implementing measures to control drug activity, prevent violence and secure each campus
and ensuring that student behavior allows for a productive learning environment by putting into place appropriate disciplinary actions that are uniformly pursued when behavior is inappropriate. In the brochure, A Vision for the Future, one of the beliefs is that the family is a primary influence on the development of a child. Since we know that teachers cannot do it alone, where in the strategic plan are parents assisted in fulfilling their responsibilities to the education of their children? Indeed the beliefs that are included in the strategic plan focus heavily on the need for parental and community involvement in the education of every child. These beliefs mean nothing if the community fails to recognize its responsibilities in the education effort. Strategy 8 articulates actions intended to bring together parents, school board members, citizens of the community, and schools in a joint effort to provide a quality education for every child. Implementation of this strategy will bring about greater collaboration with the community to offer more comprehensive early childhood programs. These programs will include an emphasis on parenting skills as weU as a provision for community based services that bring together parents, students, and a host of community resources for the purpose of furthering the education of all children. Additionally, strategy 8 outlines actions to create an educational climate which encourages meaningful and ongoing parent/teacher interaction by eliminating barriers and providing opportunities for broad participation in the learning process. if t Little Rock School District OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT .1 May 3. 1996 0 19^0 OfficQ Of fc... Ms. Ann Brown ODM 201 E. Markham, Suite 510 Little Rock, AIv "I 2201 Dear Ms. Brown: You are cordially invited to join me for a very special announcement concerning the progress of the Little Rock School District in its ongoing effort to meet the obligations of the Desegregation Plan. The announcement will be made as part of a press conference to be held on Wednesday, May 8, 1996, 1:00 p.m. at 1500 Park Street. We will meet in the auditorium in the event of inclement weather. I look forward to seeing you on May 8. Sincerely, Henry P. Williams Superintendent 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 324-2000 MAY-15-1996 09=05 GEVEF SPRINGS FBC CP 50i 5c2 aiS3 F.Ol ^^^Gjzggr Springs First Saptist Church 5615 Ginger Springs l^oad Litt I p RocL 72209 Ip Rock, 72209 To: Of: Prom: PpIX pages
Time: phonp 501 55-3474- PfiX 501 562-4159 ate: o /<4/a 0! 0 '5 Comments: A- .-rj A -\ 4 * r u. .Aja.'T' I y = cj I c A ' 3 0 -/ - i J I 5 / f s. / < TS-- iTt-- Q. f c ^5 IMAY-15-1996 09:06 GEYEP 3FRIM1. SOI c. 4139 i3. Mav 15, I9Q6 J Two roads diverged in ayellow' wood, and 1- I took rhe one less travelled by. And that has made af 1 the difference. From now on each time I read this poem by Robert Frost, I will think of you - our special Senior Class ot 1996. I will remember that, by choosing to continue with the Honors/AP prouram. you have metaphorically chosen a different path and. in this case, a more difficult one I will remember your perseverance in the face of so many assigned works to read, so many papers to write, so much red ink. ( 1 hope you know that sadism is not part of my nature, but rather that 1 knew you were capable of excellence and that life demands attention to detail.) I will remember your courage as I played Devil's Advocate in discussions and tried to hold you accountable for generalized statements. ( I hope you realize that I wished not to change your point of view, but to strengthen it and that you will be held accountable in medicine and law. teaching, engineerinn, the ministry, business, and family life.) I will remember your endurance as you played volleyball, softball, and baseball, golf, soccer, and tennis, as you ran track and put together the school newspaper, panicipated in drama productions and oratory contests and Superintendent's Cabinet and Mercantile Bank Board meetings. You sang in the choir, played in the band, marched and cheered at every home game and many of those away Some of you worked at afterschool jobs and several endured personal trauma and family trials. You accomplished all this and still stayed through .AP to the end and met all the deadlines, ^'ou have surpassed my greatest expectations. ?Vid, consequently, 1 want to thank you for that and for the new and unique perspectives you have given me on so many different subjects. Some people believe that studying the Humanities, literature in panicuiar, is a waste of time because these subjects do not help you make a better living. I would like to hope they will make living better. You have read of the nature of good and evil from Shakespeare and Golding, of racism and Colonialism from Achebe . Existentialism from Hemingway, selfhood from Kafka, the impact of an unjust society on the individual from Wright, courage of conviction from Huck, the human tragedy that can result from those who blindly follow tradition from Jackson, and the rewards of grit and determination from a little girl who named herself Ellen Foster and whose II. 'new mama" showed us all what a loving parent should be. We learn mainly from e.xperience, of course, but we define and conceptualize through these things that come from books - the products of long hours and days of thought and editing, visions and revisions, (to paraphrase Ellen Gilchrist ) the best parts of the best minds that have ever lived on earth, your real legacy from the educational sy.stem that no one can ever take from you in any-MAV-15-I99b 09:07 I3E\E? SPPiriG PBC -11 way As long as there are schools and libraries and free societies, this will be waitinu for you whenever you wish to take it And lire will be better for vou w hen you do Some time ago ar a party an acquaintance ct'ours, a businessman in the community, discussed the wonders of the corporate world with my husband for a few minutes and then turned to me - with incredulity, 1 thought- and asked why on earth I chose teaching as a career, especially in Arkansasyou can guess the rest 1 was stunned and could only answer at the moment that. well, I liked it It was a question 1 could not let go of and, as we so often do, I replayed the moment in my mind. I suppose I
-hose teaching initially because, except for Donna Reed , June Cleaver, and my own sweet mother, my only role models were the strong, traditional women who tauuht me at Puiaski Heia.hts and Central High School Later I stayed because, luckily, mv salary was not the primary one in our family. But it is more than this - these are the superftcial reasons. If he reeled around at .me once more, if 1 could replay that instant with all my wits about me, I would say, "Why did I choose teaching Well, it is because of Bry an and Jeremy, Clif, Ryan, and Cheryl, Erica and Ashley, Liz, Sarah, .Alicia, Brigette, and Meredith, Tara , Leslie and Erin, John Paul, Corey, and Patrice, Tamika and Tanika, Dereka and Daphne, Laura, Brandi, Charneile. Amber and Stacy. And certainly it is also because of Cristy and Felicia, Jeremy H. and Jason, Lizz. Hunter, Jill and Kara. Torrie and Angie. Tamara, Aronna, Kevin, Kelly, and Jeff, Allison and Ron. Kerrie, Tametra. Melvelyn, and Rusty.Kisa, Reesa, and Mackenzie. .May the sun snine warmly on your face, -May the rain fall gently on your shoulders. May the road rise up to meet you. And may God always hold you in the palm of His Hand With much love, / d TOTAL P.yZ6 -Sec. yn ee n received OCT 2 5 1996 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION Office of Desegfesaiion Date: October 9, 1996 To: District Biracial Committee Members From: Dr. Paul J. Smith, Coordinator, Program Monitoring Through: Dr. Ed Jackson, Director Subject: Incentive School Program Monitoring Enclosed are copies of the Planning, Research and Evaluation/School Biracial Committee monitoring dates. One list is arranged alphabetically by school, and the other list is arranged chronologically. These lists are provided to make you aware of dates PRE will be monitoring this semester. Members of the District Biracial Committee have a standing invitation to accompany the Planning, Research and Evaluation (PRE) Team to any of the Little Rock School District (LRSD) schools for a monitoring visit Whether you visit schools with the PRE team or on your own, our ofBce stands ready to assist you if needed. Our phone number is 324-2120. I have enclosed three monitoring checklist instruments for your use in addition to the one distributed earlier...one for each quarter. It would be appreciated if you would return the completed monitoring instrument and a team consensus report to the PRE ofBce as soon as possible after the monitoring visits to incentive schools. LRSD incentive schools are: Franklin, Garland, Ivlitchell, Rightsell and Rockefeller Please note that we have also enclosed four copies of the Incentive School Student Recruitment addendum checklist for your use. Encl: (9) Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District o( Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 Date: October 18, 1996 To
From: Brown Bobby Lester, Don Roberts, James Smith, Gene Wilhoit Subject
ODM 1996-97 Monitoring Priorities and Procedures My staff and I have identified our monitoring priorities for the 1996-97 school year, which are listed on the enclosure. As is our custom, we identified our monitoring emphasis by reviewing the desegregation plans and mandates from both the circuit and district courts. We also noted court orders and directives given us by Judge Wright that require ODM to review certain desegregation activities or to scrutinize specific provisions of the plans or court orders. It is possible that some of the attached topics will change depending upon unforeseen events that may develop, such as new court orders. Some of our monitoring will be in the nature of an annual follow-up on previous reports, such as school enrollment and the LRSD incentive schools. A few of the topics appeared on our list for the last school year, but we won't complete the reports until this year, such as multicultural education in the PCSSD. At the conclusion of each monitoring project, we will summarize our findings to the Court in some type of written report. Some of our reports will be brief and limited in scope, such as the extended year program in the incentive schools
others, such as that on ADE's monitoring, will be more comprehensive and, therefore, lengthier. You can expect our monitoring procedures to remain essentially unchanged from previous years, continuing to include review of records and other written information, interviews with principals and other administrators, and visits to schools. Our observations will be directed by the same type of written guide we've used in the past. This instrument is based on provisions of the settlement agreements, court orders, or other documents that are part of the case record. As appropriate, we'll review the guide with your staff before beginning formal monitoring to talk over what we'll be looking for and to answer any questions. October 18, 1996 As our monitoring timetable develops, we will notify you so you can plan accordingly. We will try to establish a schedule that avoids dates which would conflict with the calendar of other monitoring groups, such as the Biracial Committees or the ADE monitoring teams. As you're aware, some of our monitoring guides include charts that reflect various data, such as school enrollment and staffing. Because ODM monitors gather this data from the annual school profiles, rather than asking school staff to fill out forms or charts, please send the 1996-97 profiles on all schools to ODM by November 15.1996. Of course, this request applies only to the three local school districts, not ADE. I also want to reiterate that, because Judge Wright has repeatedly reminded all of us about the role and importance of plan modification, my staff and I remain wilhng to assist you in this process as appropriate. If you have any questions or comments, please call me. We're looking forward to working with you during the year ahead. cc: Bobby Acklin Billy Bowles Counsel of Record /1996-97 ODM Monitoring Priorities The 1996-97 budgets of the three school districts ADE monitoring of Pulaski County desegregation in accordance with the Settlement Agreement, the Allen Letter, the ADE Implementation Plan, and relative court orders Academic achievement and closing disparity in achievement between e races Functioning of the districtwide Biracial Committee in the LRSD The alternative learning centers in the three districts Recruitment for the four-year-old program to promote desegregation School facilities in the LRSD and PCSSD, with emphasis on buildings not previously monitored on this topic M-to-M transfers among the three school districts Student enrollment and racial balance within individual schools Staffing patterns and staff recruinnent for racial balance among administrators, non-certified personnel, and secondary teachers Incentive schools, with emphasis on facilities, theme implementation, programs, and those aspects of the schools that previously have been cited as needing improvement Staffing in the Incentive schools to examine hiring procedures and determine the extent of racial balance within employee categories Double funding of the incentive schools The extended year program for the incentive schools during the summer of 1997 Multicultural education in the PCSSD Finance: assuring that use of settlement monies is consistent with the desegregation plans and court orders
determining that the districts exercise fiscal responsibility such that they can fulfill their plan obligations
whether money is being wastedJOHN W. WALKER, PA. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 Telephone (501)374-3758 Fax (501) 374-4187 JOHN W. WALKER RALPH WASHINGTON MARK BURNETTE AUSTIN PORTER JR KIMBERLY R DICKSON RECEIVED OCT 2 5 1596 October 21, 1996 jifics ct Mcfiiicriny Ms. Ann Brown OflBce of Desegregation Monitoring Heritage West Bldg. 201 E. Markham Suite 510 Little Rock, Arkansas Mr. James Smith Superintendent of Schools North Little Rock School District 2700 Poplar Street No. Little Rock, Arkansas Mr. Bobby Lester Superintendent of Schools Pulaski County Special School District 925 E. Dixon Road Little Rock, Arkansas Mr. Gene Wilhoit, Director Arkansas Department of Education 4 State Capitol Mall Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1071 Dr. Don Roberts Superintendent of Schools Little Rock School District 810 W. Markham Little Rock, Arkansas Dear Ms. Brown and Gentlemen: This letter is somewhat in response to Ms. Brown's letter to you gentlemen dated October 18, 1996. It is also to put you on notice of some Joshua concerns and requests. I am asking that Ms. Brown share my letter with the Court. First, we intend to be more active in monitoring the activities of the North Little Rock School and Pulaski County Special School Districts and in bringing to the Court's attention the defections in monitoring by Mr. Wilhoit's office.Page Two October 21, 1996 not Second, we are also concerned about the OOMS own monitoring because in substance it does address the treatment, including the quality of education, of the African American students in either of the school districts on a substantive basis. We are, therefore, asking Ms. Brown to consider addressing the problems, i.e., of rules fairness and implementation as applied to minority students, the districts' use of police officers in helping to implement disciplinary rules
the grading practices of teachers
the testing practices of the districts insofar as standardized tests are provided and assessed
the use of means tests for participation in activities
and, just the general exclusionary treatment of Afiican American students. We also note an increasing tendency of each district to wear blinders to acts of provocation which often result in unnecessary student self protection response. We specifically ask Ms. Brown and Mr. Wilhoit to review this phenomena for the past two years and the current year as well. We observe that the ADE substantially "doctored" its report on monitoring last year and did not provide its full report to the Court. We are asking Ms. Brown to look into this and to make a competent assessment of the ADE monitoring with appropriate consideration of the option of reinstatement of the ADE as a party defendant. We are also asking Ms. Brown and Mr. Wilhoit to pay special attention to the situation involving Mr. Hoffman's treatment of Black and poor white students at Robinson High School. It appears that his practices there are similar to, if not more onerous, than what they were when he was at Pulaski Heights. We are prepared. to demonstrate th<at1 h1e h as sup__p__o___r_t. 1b__e__y___o__n__d_1 c_ a__v__i:li bUy.r xM/rr. Bobby Lester which makes remediation of that schools problems more difficult. Finally, we are asking that Ms. Brown not meet with any of you to suggest plan modifications unless and until we are given notice and an opportunity to participate in such meetings. We insist that this year should be about making the plan work rather than, with Court encouragement, about ways to aid you gentlemen in circumventing or obviating the plan through suggestions to which we are not privy. Thank you for your attention to these matter. Sincerely, John W. Walker JWW:lp Little Rock School District OCT 2d ter, Becky Rather & Essie Middleton, Parent Recruiters Student Assignment Office 0/tice of ^Weflajion Dear Community Leader, The Little Rock School District realizes that the transition from Elementary to Junior High is a very confusing time for many of our parents. In an attempt to make this process easier for our parents, we are preparing for our first annual 6th to 7th grade transition meeting. The meeting is schedul^ for Sunday, November 17, 1996, from 2:30 until 4:00 p.m. at Henderson Junior High School, 401 Barrow Road, Little Rock, AR.. Members of the Student Assignment Staff will present information as to how to take advantage of the choices available to parents when making the transition from Elementary to Junior High School This will include how to register for attendance zone and magnet schools, applying for desegregation and M to M transfers, and an overview of our safety and security polices and procedures. After the general meeting parents wiD have an opportunity to visit with personnel from each of our Junior High Schools to determine how they will create a learning environment thats tailored to their childs personality and talents. Opi Houses will follow the transition meeting beginning Monday, November 18, 1996 at 10:00 a.m. and 1:30 p.m. We would like to request that you make your members or patrons aware of this special event and encourage them to call our oflBce for further information. We are enclosing a flyer that we hope you will post in a conspicuous location. Likewise, if you print a bulletin or newsletter, this information ma\ be shared in written form. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation in this matter. It is extremely important that families are made aware of these and other services available to them through the Little Rock School Eiistrict. Remember, our schools are what we make them. Sincerely, Essie Middleton Parent Recruiter Parent Recruiter ENCLOSLTtE receivf^ Becky Rather OCT 2 d 1996 Office of DesesfegaDwi Momtonns 501 Sherman Lillie Rock, AR 72202 (5011324-2272 F,\X (5ni)324.2:KlSPECIAL NOTICE TO PARENTS OF ALL 6TH GRADERS For information on the transition from Elementary to Junior High School... LRSD 6th to 7th Grade Transition Meeting Sunday, November 17, 1996, 2:30 - 4:00p.m. HENDERSON JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 401 Barrow Road, Little Rock, AR Learn the choices and opportunities available to your child in the LRSD Junior High Schools for the 1997-98 school year. FOR INFORMATION, CALL 501-324-2272 CF f*5k C./f STEPHENS AREA FAITH NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIA TION (Boundary: Pine to Woodrow, 12th to 20th Streets) 1622 S. Martin Street, Little Rock, Arkansas 72204 (Phone: 663-2962) President: Mazola Johnson Vice-President: Ollie Bradford Secretary: Stephanie Foreman Treasurer: Elder Oscar Bradshaw Chaplain: Reverend Ben Edwards June 17, 1997 received Dr. Don Roberts, Superintendent Little Rock School District 810 W. Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Dr. Roberts: JUN ! 8 1997 OFFiCEOF DESEGREGATION MONITORING The Stephens Area Faith Neighborhood Association would like to go on record endorsing the rebuilding of Stephens School at the original site which was so generously donated by Ms. Charlotte E. Stephens. Stephens School has long been a source of pride for this community and the residents of this area were devastated when it was demolished. At that time there was a promise that Stephens School would be rebuilt, however, no information has been released to the public as to when the construction is scheduled to begin. We know you and the Board are very much aware of the value to our young people of seeing promises being kept. Please do not allow Ms. Stephens contribution to the education of youth in this city to be ended. The presence of a school always makes a positive impact on a community. However, in the absence of our school, this Neighborhood Association continues to promote community awareness through neighborhood revitalization. We are focusing on neighborhood clean-ups, painting and fix-up, weed lot eradication, and helping to make our neighborhood safe. We are aware that Garland School has been proposed for closure for sometime now. Also, we learned that a facility study has been done for Mitchell School which shows that the school is not operating at peak efficiency. A state-of-the-art facility constructed on the Stephens site could support the students from these schools, as well as the students in the Stephens area who are currently attending school in other areas of town. The Stephens Area Faith Neighborhood Association would like to partner with the Little Rock School District and offer its service and support for planning the new school.Dr. Don Roberts May 17, 1997 Page 2 We are aware that the Little Rock School District is in the process of selecting a new superintendent. However, we feel that you will play a vital role in the orientation of the new superintendent to the major issues that are pending, which includes the rebuilding of Stephens School. We are very much interested in the status of the plans to rebuild Stephens School. Looking forward to hearing from you. During day hours I can be reached at 682-4268, or evening at 663-2962. Sincerely, Mazola Johnson, President cc: Little Rock School Board Members yxOffice of Desegregation and Monitoring, LRSD District Judge Susan Webber Wright JOHN W. VV4LKER, P.A. .Attorney .A? Uw 1723 Broadway Little Rock. Arkansas 72206 TELEPHO.NE (501) 374-3758 FAX (501) 374-4187 JOH.N W. W.UKER R.ALPH WASHINGTON MARK BURNETTE AUSTIN PORTER, JR, Ila Fax August 19, 1997 Dr. Don Roberts, Superintendent of Schools Little Rock School District Slow. Markham Little Rock, Arkansas Re
Little Rock School District Dear Dr. Roberts
Since my fax to you this morning, Mr. Doug Eaton has effectively suspended Mr. Wilson from driving vehicles. I believe this action borders on retaliation for having filed a protest on behalf of Mr. Wilson against the treatment described in my earlier letter of today. Would you kindly ask someone, possibly Mr. Ray Gillespie to look into this matter to ascertain the facts. Retaliation certainly should not befall persons who make complaints regarding acts which they believe to have racial overtones directed toward them by their supervisors be they black or white. Thank you for your immediate attention to this matter. Sincerely, John W. Walker JWW:Ip cc: Mr. Ricky Wilson T2:T i6, 6T anti Z0d T00 udid ciH-i a3
>rinJOHN W. W.ALKER R-4LPH Washington MARK BURNETTE .AUSTIN PORTER, JR. JOHN w. Walker, p.a. Attorney .at Liw 1723 Sro.wwav Little Rock. .Ark.a.ns.\s 72206 Telephone (SOU .374-3758 fax (501) 374-4187 Via Fax August 19, 1997 Dr. Don Roberts, Superintendent of Schools Mr. Doug Eaton Little Rock School District 810 W. Markham Little Rock, Arkansas Re: Little Rock School District Gentlemen
xW. Ricky Wilson who works in Plant Services was referred to by his supervisor as a "boy' on Thursday of last week and XL. Wilson challenged the usage of that term, he was advised that he was tenmnated. I w sure that Mr. Eaton wiU have a slightly different interpretation regarding this matter but I would like to confer with you regarding this matter and the other parties because I believe that this violates the desegregation plan commitments regarding fair and nondiscriminatory treatrnent of empl^-ees as weU as students. I would like to schedule a meeting regarding this matter for Thursday of this week if you are available. Otherwise, it would be my advise to Mr. Wilson to .fl pursue legal remedies for damages for discrimination in violation of the Desegregation plan . plan. you both will recall, my office has consistently questioned Mr. Eaton's genuine commitment to the dese^egauon plan and has suggested that he has taken efforts to undermine it. Tolerance of this kind of behavior, in my opinion, is undermining behavior itself. Thank you for your immediate attention to this matter. lincerely, 't ohn W. Walker JWW:lp cc
Mr. Ricky Wilson I 02:t z.6< St sny 20d t00 waid nyi asxw! dstrfictes' J, Summary of Proposed Remedy Methodology and Estimated Outcomes Fiscal Years 1997 & 1998 Including Federal Participants In Health Insurance Excluding Employees of the Office of Desegregation Monitoring I LEA 6001 6002 6003 County Pulaski Pulaski Pulaski 9999 District Little Rock School District North Little Rock Sch, Dist, Pulaski County Special S,D, State Totals 1 1996-97 State Equalization $40,785,144 $23,335,255 $55,946,194 $1,228,697,744 2 1996-97 Retirement/ Insurance $13,775,834 $4,458,912 $9,585,724 $182,946,180 3 1996-97 Equalization for Benefits $6,072,908 $3,474,619 $8,330,388 $182,953,094 4 1996-97 Desegregation Adjustment $7,702,926 $984,293 $1,255,336 $9,942,554 Exhibit 604 Revised Percentage of Equalization: Total Adjustment: 14 89% $9,942,554 LEA 6001 6002 6003 9999 County Pulaski Pulaski Pulaski District Little Rock School District North Little Rock Sch. Dist, Pulaski County Special S.D. State Totals Percentage of Equalization: Total Adjustment: GRAND TOTAL
1997-98 State Equalization $12,452,259 $24,407,785 $55,691,010 $1,296,496,325 1997-98 Retirement/ Insurance $14,278,811 $4,006,297 $9,665,873 $191,593,564 1997-98 Equalization for Benefits $6,274,444 $3,607,471 $8,231,131 $191,622,157 1997-98 Desegregation Adjustment $8,004,367 $998,827 $1,434,742 $10,437,935 14.78% $10,437,935 $20,380,490 Exhibit A to DeclarationSummary of Proposed Remedy Methodology and Estimated Outcomes Fiscal Years 1997 & 1998 Including Federal Participants in Health Insurance Excluding Employees of the Office of Desegregation Monitoring 1 LEA 6001 County Pulaski 6002 Pulaski District Little Rock School District North Little Rock Sch. Dist. 6003 Pulaski 9999 Pulaski County Special S.D. State Totals 1996-97 State Equalization $40,785,144 $23,335,255 $55,946,194 $1,228,697,744 2 1996-97 Retirement/ Insurance $13,420,826 $4,458,912 $9,585,724 $182,591,173 3 1996-97 Equalization for Benefits $6,060,672 $3,467,619 $8,313,604 $182,584,485 4 1996-97 Desegregation Adjustment $7,360,154 $991,293 $1,272,120 $9,623,567 LEA 6001 County Pulaski 6002 Pulaski 6003 Pulaski 9999 Percentage of Equalization: Total Adjustment: District Little Rock School District North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Pulaski County Special S.D. State Totals 1997-98 State Equalization $42,452,259 $24,407,785 $55,691,010 $1,296,496,325 14.86% $9,623,567 Percentage of Equalization: Total Adjustment! GRAND TOTAL
1997-98 Retirement/ Insurance $13,914,580 $4,606,297 $9,665,873 $191,229,334 1997-98 Equalization for Benefits $6,261,708 $3,600,148 $8,214,424 $191,233,208 1997-98 Desegregation Adjustment $7,652,872 $1,006,149 $1,451,449 $10,110,470 14.75% $10,110,470 $19,734,037 12/11/98RI r- Little Rock School District January 23,1998 Ms. Ann Brown ODM 201 E. Markham, Suite 510 Little Rock, AR 72201 -JAN 2 6 1988 ^^^SREGATIONMONITORIHG Dear Ms rown: The Little Rock School District is serving as a local site for a national videoconferernce presented by The Annenberg Forum at Brown University on Thursday, January 29,1998 from 6:00 - 8:00 p.m. The topic is Hope, Fairness and Power: Building Strong Schools in Urban M America. Additional Information is enclosed for your review. We hope you will be able to join us for this opportunity. Please share this information with others you feel may also be interested in attending the videoconference! Thanks so much. Sincerely, Linda Young New Futures Liaison and Restructuring Director 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)324-2000 1 ^1 Annenberg orum II .- -4 Jr- X 1 a,'t A
r- . [ i U iXAi -J * x<.. * i i aS
How can urban schools be fractured to, serve all children welt? ": f : How are teachers prepared and f supportedforworkiiiurban ' Hawdo urban ^ook build cohnec^hs with^rnUii^Snd, immunity? Hope^ Farabi antl^Pawer" tirnedjtajcoincrderw^ '**x * I Power: Building Jrban America A National Videoconference Thursday, January 2Q, i^q8 I .,^.'^SZrj segoh<tQnar^j Gom^Jxjepa^ 1
m^pMQi^^Batssec^<^j^tesg^jSW,: Sk F5,J (.Si I. I-r& s QOjintinjties S't FinQ 75*
'^ A S-^ Hi We encourage you to gather at a downlink site with educators, parents and others in your community to view the videoconference and to consider together how the videoconference might help you launch a series of local conversations about urban education in your community. HROUGH video profiles produced by WGBH, the national videoconference will take viewers into two urban high schools that are on the road to success. Students and teachers will tell about the promising ideas and hard work that have brought real improvements to each school and to its students. Their provocative stories will serve as starting points for an interactive, live conversation about what must be done to build stronger schools for our urban children. From the studios of wgbh in Boston and Turner Entertainment Network in Atlanta, a panel of educators, students and urban education experts will be convened for an on-air discussion about what they have seen in these two school profiles. The group will include: Teachers, administrators and students from the profiled schools Lisa Delpit, author of Other Peoples Children, professor of education at Georgia State University Carl Cohn, superintendent of the Long Beach Unified School District * Jean Anyon, author of Ghetto Schools, professor of education at Rutgers University Newark Ronald A. Wolk, publisher of Education Week and Teacher Magazine, will moderate the discussion. \ A Special I UY ipap ion Po Join Pls... S- ^ ?^gsfey-^- V Jr W -iSU --- r- , . i. A. Hope/iFairness-andiRowerss i&Buildirig Strong Schools irr Urban America -t ,x ** A 1^ ri? - The Annenberg Forum at Brown University presents this national videoconference on Thursday, January 29, 1998 from 6:00 - 8:00 p.m. Local Site: Little Rock School District Board Room 810 West Markham Educators, students and urban education experts from around the nation will participate. Please plan to attend in person. The videoconference also will be broadcast over LRSD-TV, Comcast Cable Channel 4. * '*<uiMMaatK>s>. W LnTLE Rock School District OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT June 10, 1998 John Walker 1723 South Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Dear Mr. Walker: Section 2.1.1. of the uW?l'e>'' received 1 1 1998 OFFICE Of OESfSfiESAIIONMONJTOfiJi^Q "Revised Desegregation and Education Plan LRSD ssnhaailll rreettaaiinn aa ude.seycxrceaacaittii onnn e education expert approved by the Joshua Intervenors development of the programs. states, desegregation and/o to policies and procedures to be implemented in accordance with this Revised Plan aanndo ttoo aassssiisstt LLRRSSDD in devising concerning desegregation or racial which adversely affect remedies to problems discrimination students." African-American This letter is to formally inform Roberts and Steven Ross have to you that the aesegregation experts aforementioned requirement. desegregation verbally agreed to experts of their caliber have in We compliance Terrance serve as with are excited that am writing them to confirm the agreed to work with agreed upon terms. us. the two I It is my understanding from our telephone that you are comfortable conversations with both of these gentlemen to some is not -in agreement, please notify me as soon as possible? Otherwise, we will continue * serve this role. please some me reason Joshua as soon as our present course. When we have scheduled dates with them to be district, we will provide you that we have scheduled dates schedule. in the Thank you very much for your cooperation. Sincerely, Lesli Carnine Superintendent of Schools cc: Ann Brown Clay Fendley 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 324-2000 I I .,5^- RECEIVED LnTLE Rock School District OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT JUL 2 1 1998 July 17, 1998 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATOM MONITORfNS Mr. Ray Simon. Director Arkansas Department of Education 4 State Capitol Mall Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1071 Re: State Department Monitoring Requirements-Pulaski County Dear Mr. Simon: My apologies for not responding to you in writing, but I mistakenly thought the previous comments of Dr. Roberts and my subsequent verbal thoughts were sufficient. We agree that the Departments requirements should be modified. We have suggested a more proactive approach to student learning issues should be emphasized. We particularly stressed the reading and early childhood issues. Further, we see the issue of student learning coupled with economic and demographic issues as being paramount and a significant state issue. The ovenwhelming social and education issues demand state intervention and monitoring. We had expressed that early childhood assistance, and targeted educational development for teachers would be two areas which research has suggested could assist in minimizing the gap between majority and minority youth. - We look forward to assisting the Department in designing a strategy to maximize the achievement of ail students. Sincerely, /I amine Superintendent of Schools cc: Ms. Ann Brown, ODM Mr. John Walker, Joshua 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 324-2000 .Ill'll' iwi '.**HiKs.\
\ 1 *T>$7*=**V^ 81 < Saie^ry ^cJlt.tJt4/t^ .^'MMKK\
\. ' 3 LnTLE Rock School District J *V3
OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT JUL 2 1 IS July 17, 1998 CrriCc GF ^-SEGREGATION klCWRU-iQ Ms. Ann Brown, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: Revised Desegregation and Education Plan Section 2/3 2.2.3 Dear Ms. Brown: We have extended the current administrative pay system by two new levels. Levels 7 and 8 have been added to the current structure for the purpose of placing the newly appointed assistant superintendents and associate superintendents. As has been previously noted, the changes and promotions will not require additional funds for district leadership positions. We have and will continue to look for opportunities to consolidate administrative and staff positions. Please understand that the rationale will be to look for opportunities that will increase services to children and teachers rather than compromise a service function. We further have indicated to the individuals promoted and to the Board of Directors that we believe the total salary plan should be independently reviewed for adequacy and equity. We anticipate contracting forthat service and are optimistic that a report and recommendations will be forthcoming during November 1998. Further, we believe that by the conclusion of the 1998-99 academic year that we will have accomplished the goal v/hich was established by the revised desegregation and education plan. Respectfully, Vesli^ V. Carnine Superintendent of Schools Attachment: Administrative Sala^ Plan & Placements cc
Board of Directors Mr. Chris Heller 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 324-2000 Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 August 7, 1998 Dr. Les Gamine Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Les: Thanks for your recent letter informing me about some of the changes youve made in the LRSDs administrative pay levels. The letter arrived July 21, which was just after Td left for a two-week trip to tend to ill family members. Im presently processing the mail that accumulated while I was out of state, so please forgive my delay in responding to you. It may be helpful for you to know that the Court has a history of intense concern about how the LRSD constructs and manages its budgets, because of the relationship between finances, district operations, and desegregation goals. For example, the Court has been concerned about such past district practices as: funding long-term commitments (such as salaries) with one-time or short-term monies
failure to clearly align each annual budget with the districts educational and desegregation commitments
basing new budgets on the previous budget instead of actual expenditures (known as "budgeting on budget)
top-down rather than bottom-up budgeting (top-down budgeting sets numbers at the summary level and then forces the detail figures to fit those totals)
failure to link planning and evaluation activities to drive budget decisions
and failure to use written business cases (or a similar process) as a decision-making tool to define and support all manner of decisions, including salary increases, adding or deleting positions and programs, and so on. I'm not sure I understand how the information in your letter and its attachments fits into the districts approach to fulfilling its Plan commitment (2.2.3) to establish a uniform salary schedule for all positions within the district, provide compensation in accordance with qualifications, and minimize complaints of favoritism. I note that you chose to set the salaries of top administrators before establishing the uniform salary schedule for all positions in the district, which sounds like the carts before the horse and also could be construed as a form of favoritism. I also note that youve chosen to establish the salaries of top administrators before concluding contract and salary negotiations with the union, a timing decision that could bolster the unions leverage position..August 7, 1998 Page Two I'm not questioning your right to make decisions about salaries or timing. Rather Tin concerned about the district's overall financial management practices. I would be remiss if 1 didn't emphasize that the Court has paid considerable attention to budget management over the years and has frequently admonished the LRSD about the need for a budget planning and management system that will enable the district to make careful financial decisions, effectively manage its multimillion dollar business, and reach its desegregation goals. I would be happy to discuss with you any aspect of the districts budgeting history, including the role of the Budget Specialist the Court appointed for the district in 1993. .Although Ill be closely monitoring the districts budget development and management process and will need further information later on, right now Id appreciate a copy of your administrative organizational chart that includes the names of each individual administrator. Id also like the job description for each position so I understand who is responsible for what. Thank you very much. Sincerely yours. .Ann S. BrownBOffice of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 August 14, 1998 Dr. Les Gamine Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Dr. Gamine: One of the joys of working with the Little Rock School District is supporting district initiatives that are designed as both prevention and intervention programs attuned to the special needs of students. Thats why Im pleased to endorse the Residential Alternative Elementary School for at-risk 3*, 4* and S"* graders. The optimal application of the charter school concept is to develop innovative, break-the-mold schools that venture beyond the constraints of traditionally stmctured institutions. The Residential Alternative Elementary School will apply fresh but proven ideas and approaches to meet the unique needs of at-risk children where other schools have fallen short. Since 1988,1 have been well-acquainted with the Pfeifer Kiwanis Camp program on which the new school will be modeled. My staff and I have closely observed the Camps alternative program and know that it works: children who were on the verge of failure in schoolas well as lifelearn how to learn, expand and hone their academic skills, relinquish self-defeating behaviors, and take responsibility for their actions. These children leave the Camp with new-found direction, capabilities, and confidence. The Pfeifer Camp methods deserve to be applied in a school designed specifically to turn at-risk children around while their malleable minds and moldable character can be reshaped and redirected. The Residential Alternative Elementary School is worthy of support by everyone who cares about making a difference for all children. f" Sincerely yours, I Ann S. Brown) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT INSTRUCTIONAL RESOURCE CENTER 3001 PULASKI STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72206 2 1398 OffiCfOF August 31, 1998 TO
Ann Brown, ODM FROM: Dr. Bonnie Lesley, Associate Superintendent - Instruction SUBJECT: Promised Documents As I promised, I am sending to you a couple of documents: 1. A copy of the Executive Summary of the Kansas City, Kansas, Exit Plan ( ) 2. A copy of adiafi of our Division 1998-99 Work Plan. Wed welcome your feedback. - (t"*? jIviac,4 .'#) Tm looking forward to our meeting at ODM and to my lunch with you and T rr-i 1 _ 1-_____T tl-iA pnn^'prcntmn I Liz. Thanks to for your Friday phone cal. I enjoyed the conversation! BAL/rcmOffice of Desegregation Monitoring United Stales District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 September 21, 1998 Dr. Les Carnine, Superintendent Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Les: As I explained when we met on August 31, each fall as the school year gets underway, ODM monitors briefly and informally visit a few schools in all three districts. The observations we make at that time are in the same vein as those of parents, students, and staff as they enter the building to start the new year. That's why we pay attention to the aspects of a school that are most likely to initially impress those entering it, such as the condition of the grounds, building upkeep and cleanliness, displays and furnishings, student and staff conduct, and so forth. This year we dropped in on ten LRSD schools during the first full week of classes: Bale, Booker, Cloverdale, Otter Creek, Rightsell, Wakefield, and Washington Elementaries
Forest Heights and Mabelvale Junior Highs
and Hall High School. A list of our observations about each school is attached. As I told you last month, overall we were favorably impressed with the condition of the buildings and the many fine preparations for the opening of school that we saw. We intend for these comments to give you, your administrators, and the principals of these buildings the benefit of our impressions. Therefore, as has been our custom, we will not publish or file these observations at this time, although we might eventually factor them into some aspect of a report. I hope the enclosed information is helpful. Please dont hesitate to call if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely yours, S. Brown Enc. cc: Sadie Mitchell Building principalsForest Heights Junior High School We were pleased to note that: The exterior of the building was well tended and despite a very dry, hot summer, the ground plantings were in good condition. The shaded courtyard where students gathered to sit at picnic tables and on benches was litter free. The entryway and all corridor floors were polished to a high shine. Waste baskets were placed at intervals along each corridor, and no litter was evident anywhere on the campus. Concrete walls were attractive and lockers were in like-new condition. Some exterior doors in the older building were decorated with colorful murals. Stairways were well lit and wide enough for heavy traffic. The buildings and classrooms were very quiet. Fire extinguishers were highly visible and plentiful. The cafeteria was spotless and the tables were in good repair. Wide aisles in the kitchen facilitated trafiic flow. The gymnasium was old but well maintained and had handicapped seating available in the bleacher area. The basketball court sparkled, and the locker rooms were clean and neat. The media centers special lighting over the checkout desk and magazine section greeted visitors with a dramatic effect, almost like sunlight. The room had well-kept carpeting, educational displays, attractive furnishings, an eye-catching materials collection, and a computer work station that was on-line to the Internet. The girls restrooms were exceptionally clean with no litter or graffiti
the sinks and faucets (including those in the older buildings) were in excellent condition
they had plenty of paper products available
the stall doors looked new
and each restroom was handicapped accessible. The boys restrooms in the main building were spic-and-span, well supplied, and furnished with mirrors that glistened. The boys restrooms in the older sections of the building were similarly clean, despite their age. We also noted some areas needing attention: The raised planting beds were overgrown with weeds. The older areas of the campus had serious soil and concrete erosion. The courtyard where students gathered was barren from heavy traffic. One stairwell window had a horizontal crack that ran the entire length of the casement. The cinder block wall at the entrance to the cafeteria was badly soiled and stained, creating a very unsightly and unappealing appearance. In the cafeteria, the stools were in poor condition and the ceiling tile was seriously water damaged. In the kitchen, the wet areas lacked mats
several floor tiles were chipped, cracked, or broken
an oven was broken
and a wheel was missing from a large milk cart, causing it to tip to one side. The temperature in the gymnasium was near 100. Some girls restrooms lacked soap and disposals for feminine hygiene products. The ceiling in one girls restroom that was located in an older building was badly peeled and insulation was pulled from one section of a heating vent pipe. One restroom had no identifying sign.Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 Memo To: Les Gamine From: Ann Bro' Subject: LFpcoming ODM Monitoring in the LRSD Date: February 4, 1999 I want you to know that my associate, Margie Powell, will be undertaking a monitoring project in the LRSD over the next few weeks. Margie will be reviewing district records to determine the types of disciplinary sanctions used in the LRSD and the rates at which black and white students are disciplined in the districts schools. I believe that Margie has already spoken to Dr. Linda Watson and Jo Evelyn Elston about her monitoring project. Margie explained that our report will be similar to that which we published last year on discipline in the Pulaski County Special School District and one we will soon publish on the North Little Rock School District. As is our routine, we will share our findings with the district before we publish our report. If you have any questions, please dont hesitate to call me or Margie. As always, we appreciate your cooperation.c.' Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 Date: February 8, 1999 To: Les Gamine From: Ann Browi Re: ODM Monitoring Project We are in the process of researching and writing a report on the LRSDs preparation for implementation of its revised desegregation plan. We plan to publish this report in the spring so you can have the benefit of our observations as the district enters into final preparations for the 1999-2000 school year. Please let your staff know that they can expect to be contacted in the near future by my associates, who will be requesting certain records and documents and also making appointments for interviews with some district managers. As is our custom, we will share our findings with the district to check for accuracy before we publish our report. If you have any questions, Ill be happy to answer them. Thanks very much for your cooperation.Little Rock School District February 25, 1999 MEMORANDUM TO: Ms. Melissa Guldin, ODM FEB 2 b iS9y OffiCt Cr KS6RK.AT!CraSBi,VG FROM: Sadie Mitchell, Associate Superintendent - School Services SUBJECT: Information Needed I have attached copies of the following information you needed: 1. Letter-Narcissus Tyler Mitchell Task Force Committee (P-'Icj 2. Timeline for Summer School (Hi'ltd Suryjmev' 3, Educational Specification Committee Education Committee 4. Flyers 5. Summer School Report Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)324-2000 Plan -L'/cJ i' RECEIVED Little Rock School District MAR 2 1999 OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OFHCEOF DESEGREGAnOMMO^i'CP'^ March 1,1999 Ms. Melissa Guldin 201 E. Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ms. Guldin: I am pleased to share that the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District approved the Strategic Plan 1998 - 2003 at the January board meeting. Paula Patterson and Diane Vibhaker did an outstanding job of presenting the Strategic Plan recommendations to the Board. A special thank you to Paula and Diane. The work outlined in the plan is proceeding on the timeline that was recommended. The District is actively implementing the major initiatives of campus leadership, middle school implementation, and standards based curriculum development in the core areas, all of which will lead to increased student achievement. I have enclosed a copy of the approved plan. Again, thank you for your commitment and support to the District. Your participation on the Strategic Planning Team is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, A LesliaV. Carnine SuperiWendent Encl. 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 824-2000 Cormpldt -C'le.' Correi. + Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 376-6200 Fax (501) 371 -0100 March 12, 1999 Ms. Catherine Ware 7705 McDaniel Drive Little Rock, AR 72209 Dear Catherine: Thanks very much for your phone call this morning. It was a pleasure talking with you. I can understand your distress at the Little Rock School District declining to allow your four-year- old son to remain at Rockefeller for kindergarten next year. Once our children have settled into a school and are happy, we naturally want them to remain. As I explained, the districts new desegregation plan has resulted in the district choosing to make significant changes in its student assignment policies. Tm including a copy of some pages from the LRSD Student Registration Handbook for 1999-2000, which lists the student assignment priorities. As youll see, children living in the new assignment zones have top priority for assignment to their neighborhood school, with grandfathered students second. Apparent, this policy is responsible for your childs reassignment from Rockefeller to another school. As a parent, you have every right to make your concerns about the new student assignment policies known, especially in relation to the purpose and spirit of the Rockefeller magnet program. You may wish to talk with Mr. Junior Babbs, who supervises the Student Registration Office (phone 324-2045), or the Superintendent of Schools, Dr. Les Carnine (324-2012). You may also contact one or more members of the Board of Education. Ive enclosed a page from the districts telephone directory that lists their names and phone numbers. Dr. Katherine Mitchell is the representative from the zone in which Rockefeller is located and Mrs. Sue Strickland represents the area in which you live. If you have more questions or need further information, please dont hesitate to call me. Sincerely yours, Ann S. Brown Enc. Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown. Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 March 15, 1999 Dr. Bonnie Lesley Little Rock School District IRC 3001 Pulaski Street Little Rock, AR 72206 Bv Fax Dear Bonnie: Enclosed are copies of the two sheets of paper that I, as the parent of a Rockefeller 6* grader, received Thursday night from my son. Andrew said that he had been instructed to have his parents fill out one form (headed only Dunbar Magnet Middle School, 7' Grade 1999/2000") and return it the next day, on Friday. Judging by the number of phone calls Ive received from confused, bewildered parents of soon-to-be middle school students (most of them from Rockefeller), Im not the only prospective LRSD middle school parent who has been directed by a sheet of paper (hereafter The Form) to make careful choices" for an entire academic year in her youngsters life because no schedule changes will be allowed, yet have received no guidance whatsoever in how to intelligently do so. As parents (including me) have tried to make sense of this baffling course selection form, some of the following questions have crowded our minds: The Form came to us with checks at certain points in the first 6 categories. Who put the checks there? Did she or he follow the criteria listed on the Teacher Recommendation Form (for students currently in grade 6) that includes an item that reads, Placement in mathematics determined by interest and path that began in seventh grade? Neat time trick. Do we have the option of changing any of these selections ? Can we elect keyboarding in a category where bold Xs appear to preclude a different choice students and parents might want to make? If not, how long must our children wait to learn this critical skill? What does exploratory Foreign Language and Culture entail? (And why was that course selected for my child rather than the others listed?) Amd what is Global Expressions? Planet Earth? International Money? Some parents have been at a loss to understand the encryptions Pre-AP, G/T, and RR, as they arent decoded anywhere on the form.(tijt Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 March 18, 1999 Mr. Junious Babbs LRSD Student Registration Office 501 Sherman Street Little Rock, AR 72202 Dear Junious: My office is receiving calls from some distressed parents of students who are presently in the four-year-old program at Rockefeller. At least one of these students has been enrolled at Rockefeller since babyhood. These parents, who are probably African-American, maintain that the LRSD is not allowing their children to remain at Rockefeller through grandfathering and complain that the district has reassigned the children to their zoned school, which in at least one instance is a one-race incentive school. They say that when their children were accepted at Rockefeller, they were told their children could remain there throughout the elementary years. These parents contend that they havent been given an adequate explanation of why their children are being forced to leave Rockefeller. I have not seen any of the letters they say they have received from the district. Please send me a copy of whatever generic correspondence your office is sending to parents, such as those at Rockefeller, whose children are being displaced by assignment zone students. Im aware that the districts Student Registration Handbook 1999-2000 lists assignment priorities for attendance zone schools, with zoned students first on the list and grandfathered students second, followed by other categories. I assume that this assignment policy is driving the displacement of the Rockefeller four-year-old students whose parents are upset. As you know, the historical purpose of Rockefellers ECE magnet program has been multifaceted to promote student achievement through early prevention and intervention
to aid desegregation by enrolling racially-balanced early childhood classes and then providing a matriculation pathway for those children through each subsequent grade at Rockefeller
and to promote a sense of belonging, cohesion, and allegiance to the entire school among those students and parents who, starting in the early childhood magnet program, can anticipate spending over a decade together at Rockefeller. Rockefellers enrollment figures over the past 11 years reflect that this strategy has been highly successful. The schools population this year is 44% white and 56% black, proportions that are far more racially balanced than the vast majority of LRSD schools. Further, enrollment at Rockefeller is at an all-time high, with the school at 99% capacity this year. Clearly, Rockefeller is one of the districts success stories.Page Two I am well aware of the student assignment provisions in the LRSDs revised desegregation plan and the nature of the assignment changes the provisions allow the district to make. In that same plan, the district also pledged that it would not modify a magnet program that is successful. Rockefeller is not an area school, but an incentive school with a magnet program. Thus, its classification is unique. Many of Rockefellers staff members and parents are expressing fears that the district is indeed modifying the ECE magnet program and instituting practices that could thwart the continued success of Rockefeller and return this fully desegregated school to the race status from which it has evolved through much painstaking work on the part of many. one- So I can understand the districts current intentions and practices in relation to Rockefeller, I would appreciate answers to the following questions: 1 Has the LRSD revised its philosophy and policies regarding the role and implementation of magnet programs, such as that at Rockefeller? If so, please provide me with this information and a reference to the Board meeting in which the change was approved. 2. The continuity between the ECE magnet program and Rockefellers upper grades is a critical holistic aspect of the school. The new student assignment policies, as I understand they are being applied at Rockefeller, appear to be separating the magnet program from the rest of the school. How does the district foresee that such a dichotomization will help to preserve the success of the magnet program and of the entire schooH 3. The district has a history of allowing children enrolled in the ECE program to remain at Rockefeller throughout the subsequent grade levels. Is the district initiating a policy that will allow students who start Rockefeller in the ECE grades to remain at the school only until such time as they may be crowded out by attendance zone children? 4. The MRC is responsible for overseeing the stipulation magnets, yet the Committee also publicizes and recruits for the schools with magnet programs, such as Rockefeller. What is the MRCs position regarding potential changes in the districts policies and practices in placing and displacing students at Rockefeller? 5. In the spirit of the desegregation case and good faith with the community, does the district intend to preserve the racial balance that has been achieved at Rockefeller? How? 6. How does the district intend to preserve the continuity between the ECE grades and the upper grades at Rockefeller? Thanks very much for your assistance. Sincerely yours, Ann S. Brown '< Little Rock School District recessed JUN 3 1999 owctov MONHOWHS June 2, 1999 The main thing is to keep the main thing the main THING! Dear Colleagues: What a yeai ! I hope all of you have the sense of accomplishment that I do! The positive opportunities for the school district continue to develop. We have had great individual and collective accomplishments, but the most exciting aspect of the year has been that the instructional indicators are pointing to very positive future results. A parent and a teacher asked me how that could be true. Hadnt I seen the newspaper story showing results of the 4' grade literacy and math exam? Yes, but when we looked at those we noticed the schools that were pilots of the ELLA program K-3 and math, all had strong gains. Staff development has not been universally accepted or appreciated, primarily because of the many failed promises of programs and quick fix elixirs of the past! But this time this very basic and focused approach appears to be just what the doctor ordered. Most educational reformers who have produced results over time have agreed it is a matter of focus-getting everyone on the same page with a standard or basic program. All the efforts of parents, students and teachers, regardless of the specialty, are focused to produce progress on a limited set of goals. ELLA training and the focused math training will continue to produce results on basic reading and math achievement goals. And let us not forget district graduates really had no peers when it came to top student awards in a number of state and national academic categories. Student activities have been a very pleasant surprise. The numbers of students participating grew impressively, and I know this helped to produce an improved year in student behavior. Many of you remember when state winners were most often decided within the schools of Little Rock, and Im talking about a variety of co-curricular activities. The district again has asserted itself with impressive performances in music, art, drama, speech, debate and athletics. With the implementation of the middle schools and neighborhood schools our students and programs will only become stronger. Without question, the academic reasoning for middle schools and 9-12 high schools will provide academic strength, and it will have a positive impact with increased student participation in career/technical programs and co-curricular activities. (continued) 810 West Markham Street Little RocR, Arkansas 72201 (501)324-2000RECEIVED AUG 2 1 iS99 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING Little Rock School District August 12, 1999 Ann Brown Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Mrs. Brown: The Little Rock School District will hold a staff convocation at the Statehouse Convention Center on Wednesday, August 18, to welcome staff members back for the coming school year. Our convocation keynote speaker will be Ernest Green, formerly of Little Rock, who now serv'es as Managing Director of Public Finance for Lehman Brothers in Washington. I would like to extend to you an invitation to join us at 9:00 a.m. on August 18 for Mr. Greens address. Please advise Suellen Vann, 324-2020, if you will be able to join us. I anticipate the program will end at about 11:15 a.m. Sincerely, / I
eslie\V. Camine Superintendent of Schools 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)324-2000 Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 To: From: Mark Milhollcn, Manager of Financial Services Little Rock School District i^i^^^^olly Ramer, Office Manager Through^ff^J^'Cm S. Brown, Federal Monitor Subject: Jackie Banks Date: August 25. 1999 Jacquelyn J. Banks (432-66-0119) will be taking 10 days leave without pay during the month of September 1999. As a result, Jackies salary should decrease by $672. 1 would like to have the $672 distributed between the September 1, 1999 and December 15, 1999 pay checks, thereby decreasing Jackies gross from $428 to $344 for the next eight pay days. Beginning with September 1, 1999 and continuing through December 15, 1999, please make the adjustment so that Jackies bi-monthly gross will be $344. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to call.Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 September 9, 1999 Dr. Les Carnine, Superintendent Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, .AR 72201 Dear Les: Thank you for your recent letter in response to our .August 1999 report on the districts preparations for this school year. Im glad to hear that you and your staff have read the document, and we hope you have found it helpful. I appreciate the additional information that you provided in your letter. .As for your speculation that the information may not have been available at the time of our research. I want to emphasize what our reports introduction notes: LRSD staff members who had contributed to our research (either through direct interviews or by providing documentation) received the rough draft of our findings a few days before our report was finalized and published. On .August 3 we hand delivered the drafts, invited your staff to offer corrections or updated information, and picked up their written comments on August 5. We reviewed those comments, made appropriate changes in the report, and then filed the completed document less than a week later on August 11. This advance review of our findings is designed to assure the accuracy and completeness of our reports. How successfully we reach that goal depends in great part on the accuracy and completeness of the information upon which we base our reports. I believe that we afforded your staff a fair opportunity to help us get this report right. Sincerely yours, Ann S. Brown09/17/1999 10:23 5013242090 LRSD HUMAN RESOURSES Sep-17--99 O8S17A cyffice o Desegregation a 501 371 0100 PAGE 02/02 P.02 Office of Desegregation Monitoring United Slatas District CoiMI Eastern District ot AiXansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (S01)376-6a Fax (SOI) 371-0100 To: From: Dr. Richard Hurley, Director-Human Resources 'oily Ramer. Office Manager '^MinirS. Througl . Brown. Federal Monitor Re: SIS Employee Years Experience Report Date: September 16. 1999 /eJ Please help!! hl asking ODM employees to complete the SIS Experience Report, 1 received questions 1 could not answer. Please clarify (in writing) the type of experience you arc requesting in both Experience Total Years and Experience Total Years Out of District columns. For example, is only education-related experience or is all work experience to be counted in the Experience Total_Ycars? Do certified employees count only their educational experience and clerical count any clcncaT) Ittionally, arc ODM employees to include experience whether in an educational sotting or nol^ the years they have worked for OuM In rhe txpcriwicc Total Years in District column? /es As soon a.s I get your response, we will complete the form and return it iinmodiatcly. Thanks for your help.EMPLOYEE SITE: BOARD STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM EMPLOYEE YEARS EXPERIENCE REPORT EXPERIENCE TOTAL YEARS EXPERIENCE TOTAL YEARS IN DISTRICT EXPERIENCE TOTAL YEARS OUT OF DISTRICT BANKS. JACQUELYN J - 4,12-66-0119 BROWN. ANN S - 556-62-9151 BRYANT. LINDA F - 43 1-8S-S471 GULDIN. MELISSA R - 519-63-2999 JONES. GENE -431-76-14.16 .MARSHALL. NORMAN W - 537-23-3125 POWELL. MARGIE L - 105-34-2770 RAMER. POLLY .A - 432-83-0139 S.MITH. HORACE R - 407-74-8169 I I 27 27 18 23 36 16 23 27 10 1 I I 1 j r 8 24 14 20 4 LRSD INFORMATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT I ( I 4 8 13 8 29 3 4 3 32 12 15 14 2 Saiurday, Scpicmbcr 11, 1999 Page 14 of 144STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM EMPLOYEE YEARS EXPERIENCE REPORT EMPLOYEE EXPERIENCE TOTrYL YEARS EXPERIENCE TOTAL YEARS IN DISTRICT EXPERIENCE TOTAL YEARS OCT OF DISTRICT SITE: BOARD BANKS. JACQUELYN J - 432-66-0119 BROWN. ANN S - 556-62-9151 BRYANT. LINDA F- 431-88-8471 r I -GULDIN. .MELISSA R - 519-68-2999 $.1 / 2 Z2Z -H. JONES. GENE -431-76-1436 k i I MARSH.ALL. NORMAN W - 537-28-8125 -POWELL. MARGIE L- 105-34-2770 -RA.MER, POLLY A - 432-88-0189 I -SMITH. HORACE R - 407-74-8169 I I LRSD INFORMATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT Saturday, September 11. 1999 Page 14 of 144Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 Date: October 19, 1999 To: Debbie Milam From: Ann Brown Re: VIPS Reading Day Enclosed are cards filled out by ODM staff who are volunteering to read on VIPS Reading Day, November 16, 1999. As you and 1 discussed, the ODM staff will be leaving for a retreat right after we complete our reading assignments, so please schedule us to begin reading no later that 9:00 am. that morning. Thanks very much.Volunteers in Public Schools Reading Day Commitment Card j^YESI I will read a story to Little Rock School District students on Tuesday, November 16,1999. Name: Address:, Daytime phone: ^76?- City/Zip:. 122a I Please help us plan foryourparticipation. Complete all information accordnq to your preferences: My first choice is to read to students in Pre-K - 2nd grade 3rd-5th grade at Fg de/z preference School beginning at am no preference I am uniile to volunteer on November 16th, but would like more information about volunteeropportunities with the Little Rock School District. Please return this card to the VIPS office before October 25th by mail, fax 324-2044 or e-mail: sdgei5l@stuasn.lrsd.k12.ar.us Your confirmed assignment will be sent to you in early November. For addib'onal information, call 324-2290. Volunteers in Public Schools Reading Day Commitment Card YESI I will read a story to Little Rock School District students on Tuesday, November 16,1999. Name: Qoec^,e/yAj> -o'. I. .Q <0 X s Address: Daytime phone:. a /n City/Zip: Please help us plan foryourparticipation. Complete all information accordina to your preferences: My firrsstt.jchqjce is to read to students in, Pre-K - 2nd grade 3rd - Sth grade no preference at 'l. cay School beginning at am no preference I am unable to volunteer on November 16th, but would like more information about volunteer opportunities with the Little Rock School District. Please return this card to the VIPS office before October 25th by mail, fax 324-2044 or e-mail: sdgeisl@stuasn.lrsd.k12.ar.us Your confirmed assignment will be sent to you in early November. For additional information, call 324-2290. Volunteers in Public Schools Reading Day Commitment Card YESI I will read a story to Little Rock School District students on Tuesday, November 16,1999. Ll'iy^Q SrVa/li' an T kdiiess: fC 02> g Name: Daytime phone: ^OG City/Zip:. Please help us plan foryourparticipation. Complete all information accordina to your preferences: My first choice is to read to students in B Pre-K - 2nd grade 3rd - Sth grade no preference at School beginning at 7'3^ am no preference I am unable to volunteer on Novemb er 1'I6ttKK,i bbuutt would like more information about volunteeropportunities with the Little Rock School District. Please return this card to the VIPS office before October 25th by mail, fax 324-2044 or e-mail: sdgeisl@stuasn.lrsd.k12.ar.us Your confirmed assignment will be sent to you in early November. For additional information, call 324-2290. Volunteers in Public Schools Reading Day Commitment Card I YES! I will read a story to Little Rock School District students on Tuesday, November 16,1999. Name: Address: Daytime phone: City/Zip: 7 Please help us plan foryourparticipation. Complete all information accordna to your preferences: My first choice is to read to students in at Pre-K - 2nd grade 3rd - Sth grade School beginning at no preference am no preference 1 I am unable tovdunteer on November16th,butwouldlike more information about volunteeropportunities with the Little Rock School District. Please return this card to the VIPS office before October 25th by mail, fax 324-2044 or e-mail: sdgeisl@stuasn.lrsd.k12.ar.us Your confirmed assignment will be sent to you in early November. For additional information, call 324-2290. Volunteers in Public Schools Reading Day Commitment Card 'ESI I will read a story to Little Rock School District students on Tuesday, November 16,1999. Name: Daytime phone: Address: City/Zip: 1.-4'b to.k, AR 12-10^^ Please help us plan foryourparticipation. Complete all information accord no to your preferences: My first choice is to read to students in at Car VC_________ Pre-K - 2nd grade 3rd-Sth grade School beginning at no preference am no preference I am unable to volunteer on November 16th, but would like more information aboutvdunteeropportunities with the Little Rock School District. Please return this card to the VIPS office before October 25th by mail, fax 324-2044 or e-mail: sdgeisl@stuasn.ir5d.k12.ar.us Your confirmed assignment will be sent to you in early November. For additional information, call 324-2290. Volunteers in Public Schools Reading Day Commitment Card YES! I will read a story to Little Rock School District students on Tuesday, November 16,1999.' Name: Daytime phone: Address: 2.01 L. 54-.^ SoluIp. .Sir, Citv/Zip: LiA-VUtor.tc- Please help us plan foryourparticipation. Complete all information accordng to your preferences: My first choice is to read to students in Pre-K - nd grade' 3rd - Sth grade no preference School beginning at 9 .'On .am no preference I am unable to volunteer on November16th,butwDuldlike more information about volunteer opportunities with the Little Rock School District. Please return this card to the VIPS office before October 25th by mail, fax 324-2044 or e-mail: sdgeisl@stuasn.lrsd.k11ar.us Your confirmed assignment will be sent to you in early November. For additional informaUon, call 324-2290.Volunteers in Public Schools Reading Day Commitment Card YESI I will read a story to Little Rock School District students on Tuesday, November 16,1999. Daytime phone: Address:^ e? Citv/Zip: Please help us plan foryourparticipation. Complete all information accordno to your preferences: My first choice is to read to students in Pre-K-2nd grade 3rd - Sth grade JStflo preference 2 at School beginning at am no preference I am unable to volunteer on November 16th, but would like more information about volunteeropportunities with the Uttle Rock School District. Please return this card to the VIPS office before October 25th by mail, fax 324-2044 or e-mail
sdgeisl@stuasn.lrsd.k12.ar.us Your confirmed assignment will be sent to you in early November. For additional information, call 324-2290.Little Rock School District OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT recbved May 2, 2000 MAM i DMm'Ci'JMO.IITOBB Ann Brown, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 East Markham - Suite 510 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ms. Brown: We announced at the April 27 Regular Board Meeting that we are seeing continuing improvement in I .. . -- ----------- ------------- "g wwi Itii lUMiy VTVIllVUUII several critical indicators. During the third quarter, student behavior continued to improve in the schools. Our third quarter discipline report indicates a 21 % decrease in the number of suspensions from the same period last year. The number is significantly lower with only 1,255 suspensions during the quarter. More students are staying in school as evidenced by the decline in the number of dropouts. This years third quarter dropouts are 67% below last year. There were 150 dropouts during the third quarter in 1998-99, while there are only 50 dropouts during the third quarter this year. We might be able to attribute some of this fantastic progress to more participation by the community and especially parents within our schools. Volunteer hours increased 8% this year from 237 336 volunteer hours to last year to 255,937 for 1999-2000. And now for the best news! We had already started a trend the previous year with expulsions and suspensions and that trend is continuing. We are encouraging students to take more challenging courses in order to prepare for college...and careers. Enrollment in Advanced Placement courses by African- American students has risen by 48% from 471 during the 1997-1998 school year to this years 691. Total student enrollment in Advanced Placement courses increased 25% since the 1997-98 school year, from 1,435 to 1,791 this year. We waited to share this trend because we wanted to be sure of the success rate was accurate and that class drops had not occurred in any great numbers from initial enrollment. These are positive trends that bode well for the District and the future increased student achievement for all students. I thought you would be pleased with the continuing progress of the Little Rock School District. Sincerely, I) LeslieV- Carnine Superintendent of Schools cc: Chris Heller 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 324-2012 Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 May 18, 2000 Dr. Leslie V. Camine Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Les: Thank you for your letter earlier this month, in which you related some of the progress the district is making. Good news is always welcome! Im very encouraged to hear that student behavior is improving, dropouts are declining, and volunteer participation continues to be high. The increase in the number of African-American students in AP courses is particularly encouraging. To these accomplishments we can now add the passage of the mileage, a most significant achievement that is a harbinger of more good things to come for the district. We at ODM applaud you and your colleagues for your diligent work and offer our hearty congratulations on your successes. Sincerely yours, Ann S. Brown cc: Chris HellerrECsvEC------- OfflCEOF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 501 SHERMAN STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72202 OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Junious C. Babbs, Associate Superintendent Phone: (501)324-2272 E-Mail: icbabbs@sniasn.lrsd.kl2.ar.us JUL 2 i TO: Ann Brown. Federd Monitor FROM: Junious Babbs t' SUBJECT: Attendance Zone Changes (Response to 7-14-00 Memo) DATE: July 20, 2000 In response to your July 14'* request regarding realigned attendance zones to accommodate Mitchells continued function as an elementary school, the following information is provided. The original Mitchell School Attendance Zone has been adjusted to include what was the old Otter Creek satellite zone. Upon review of proximity and 99-00 realigned school zones, a northern section of the Mitchell zone was removed and absorbed in Martin Luther Kina. To date (7-18-00), projected school enrollments for each grade at these schools reflect: School (Capacity) Mitchell (298) Otter Creek (351) King (728) Stephens (692) P4 18 18 61 37 36 58 98 37 41 77 97 52 41 61 104 39 37 49 105 44 44 51 101 42 47 52 71 46 K 1 2 3 4 5 Copies of updated elementary, middle and high school attendance zone maps have been provided to your attention. Further review (September - October) of student attendance zones to address enrollment, building composition and plan compliance within the 2000-2001 Work Plan for LRSD Priorities is being addressed. If questions come up or additional information is needed, please feel free to give me a call. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 Division of School Services Sadie Mitchell, Associate Superintendent received TO: ice of Desegregation Monitoring FROM: Carnine, Superintendent of Schools DATE: September 7, 2000 SEP 1 3 20GG QFFiGEOf DESEGBESATtO?i MOMVrOWMQ SUBJECT: Magnet Schools Assistance Program Grant The Little Rock School District is in the process of developing a plan that will improve the educational offerings of four schools in Southwest Little Rock
Fair High School, McClellan High School, Mabelvale Middle School and Cloverdale Middle School. The schools have decided to adopt magnet-like school themes to focus on academic content and to increase student engagement in learning. The schools, along with the District's Director of Planning and Development, will aggressively seek resources to support the themes. The Magnet Schools Assistance Program provides grants to eligible local educational agencies (LEAs). Each eligible LEA that desires to receive assistance shall submit an application before December 22, 2000. The Little Rock School District is preparing to submit an application which will include the schools listed above. If you have questions, please call Sadie Mitchell at 501/324-2007. c: Junious Babbs, Associate Superintendent - Student Registration Dr. Terrence Roberts, Desegregation Consultant Dr. Stephen Ross, Desegregation Consultant Little Rock School District ^Eceweo OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OCI I- 5 2000 ORttCf October 4, 2000 Ann Brown, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 East Markham - Suite 510 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ms. Brown
We appreciate your sharing the information from your staff visits to the noted schools. I have made copies of the information and given information to the appropriate supervisor for review. A couple of years ago we would have had great difficulty dealing with the maintenance and renovation issues. Today I suspect we will have most of these items already in a maintenance, replacement or renovation cycle. Thanks again for sharing the information with us. Sincerely, Leslie V. Carnine Superintendent of Schools cc: Brady Gadberry Sadie Mitchell Donald Stewart 810 West Markham Street * Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 324-2012'ii Little Rock School District --------------- OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT October 23, 2000 Mr. John Walker 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Dear Mr. Walker: In response to information noted in your October 19*^ request regarding oversight of the principals relationships between parents and students, this responsibility has not been changed. Dr. Marian Lacey, Assistant Superintendent for Secondary Schools, is assigned this charge. If additional questions come up, feel free to get back with me. Sincerely, Leslie^y. carnine Superintendent of Schools cc: Chris Heller ZAnn Brown 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 324-2012 Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Marshall, Federal Monitor One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 Date: December 17, 2001 To: Members of the LRSD Board of Education From: Ann Marsha Re: LRSDs Contribution to ODMs Budget As 1 watched the televised meeting of the LRSD Board last Thursday, I noted the confusion among some board members about the amount the district contributes to ODMs annual budget. For your information, the correct amount for the current fiscal year is $170,864, which is based on October 1, 2001 enrollment figures. The history of our budget management is such that, every year without fail, we have been able to return to the district a portion of the amount it has appropriated to ODM for the year. I fully expect that again this year we will rebate a portion of the districts contribution at the end of this budget cycle. cc: Dr. Ken James Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Marshall, Federal Monitor One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol. Suite 1895 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 September 11, 2002 Dr. Bonnie Lesley Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Bonnie
Thanks very much for forwarding a copy of your August presentation to the Board on recent algebra, geometry, and literacy test scores. The results indicate some very encouraging improvements, upon which we congratulate you, your professional colleagues, and, of course, the students. We appreciate your keeping us informed and look forward to hearing good news during the school year. Sincerely yours, Ann S. Marshall ^/ll bt<> Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Marshall, Federal Monitor One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 376-6200 Fax (501) 371 -0100 September 17, 2002 Dr. Ken James, Superintendent Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ken: All of us at ODM join in congratulating you and your colleagues in the Little Rock School District on attaining partial unitary status. The beaming faces in the newspaper said it all, and we share in your sense of satisfaction. Weve been pleased to work closely with the district over the years as weve shared our skills and perspectives, lent our support to work teams and committees, and celebrated the schools accomplishments. Under your leadership, the district has made significant progress that makes the community proud. We look forward to resuming our work with you through the coming months as the district continues to move ahead. Sincerely yours, Ann S. Marshall cc: Board of Directors\ ,4. Individual Approach to a World of Knowledge February 13, 2003 received Dr. Kenneth James, Superintendent Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 FEB 1 5 2003 nr... OFFICE OF deseghegation monitoring Dear Dr. James: After 41 years in public educati
This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.