Compliance hearing exhibits, ''Writings on Program Evaluation-Grant Funded Projects,'' Volume II

'WRITING ON PROGRAM EVALUATION" -GRANT-FUNDED PROJECTS VOL. 2 OF 2Writings on Program EvaluationGrant-Funded Projects \ 2U Century Community Learning Centers (grant-funded project) / 1. Grant Performance Report, Year One, 1998-99 2. Annual Performance Report, 1999-2000 3. Annual Performance Report, 2000-01 Safe Schools/Healthv Students (grant-funded project) 4. Grant proposal to United States Department of Education for funding for the Safe Schools/ Healthy Students project 5. Grant Performance Report, Jan, 30, 2001 Carnegie High School Reform^tanning (grant-funded proiecf) 6. Grant proposal to the Carnegie Foundation to fund a planning year for high school reform 7. Study Circle,Xction Forum Report on Issues and Suggestions, March 1, 2001 Accelerated Learning Center / 8. App^ation for a Charter School Planning Grant (see p. 3 for Justification of the nedd) Magnet School Grant 9. Magnet Programs Grant Proposal to United States Department of EducationTABLE OF CONTENTS PART
ITEM
PAGE PARTI
APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE PART II \ ASSURANCES & CERTIFICATION PART III
BUDGET FORM & INFORMATION PART IV
PROGRAM NARRATIVE : Abstract I i Performance Indicators Reference Sheet ill t A. i INTRODUCTION 1 : NEEDS ASSESSMENT 6 B. PLAN OF OPERATION
Effectiveness of the Management Plan 29
Attainment of Specific Objectives Effective Use of Resources to Achieve the Objectives
Equal Access for Eligible Participants 37 56 68
Recruitment of Students of Different Backgrounds 73 C. i QUALITY OF PERSONNEL
Quality of the Project Director 7Q D. I Experience of Key Personnel i Quality of the Teachers i Time Commitment of Key Persormel
District Non-Dlscriminatory Practices
QUALITY OF PROJECT DESIGN
I. Magnet Schools Profile IL Program Descriptions J. A. Fair High School Mabelvale Middle School 79 92 103 104 106 107 143 McClellan High School Cloverdale Middle School 183 223 December 18, 2000 Little Rock School District TABLE OF CONTENTS PART i ITEM i PAGE E. i BUDGET AND RESOURCES
Adequacy of Facilities 267 F, G ' H. II II I i Adequacy of Equipment and Supplies I Adequacy of Reasonableness of the Budget i EVALUATION PLAN i Summatlve Evaluation i Formative Evaluation i COMMITMENT & CAPACITY i PRIORITIES
Need for Assistance
New or Significantly Revised Magnet Schools i Use of the Lottery s Innovative Approaches ! State Plan for Goals 2000 i Comprehensive Community Involvement Plan : PART V i DESEGREGATION INFORMATION PART VI
APPENDICES 278 278 282 992 297 301 305 307 309 320 329 A. pplication Education for r e d e r a 1 Note: if available, please provide A s s i s t a D c e application package on diskette and specify the file format. rar
U.S. Department of Education Fottn Approved 0MB No. 1875-0106 Exp. 06/30/2001 [j Applicant Information 1. Name and Address Organizational Unit Legal Name:. Address:___ City Little Rock School District 810 West Markham_____ ______ School District Little Rock AR State Pulaski County 72201 ZIP Code + 4 2. ApplicantsD-U-N-SNumber | 0|4 |0 |6 4| 4 |0 |0 |7 3. Applicants T-I-N 71-60 14717 4. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance #
5. Project Director:. Linda Austin Address
. 810 West Markham Little Rock City Tel.#: (501 ) 6. Is the applicant delinquent on any Federal debt? (If "Yes," attach an explanation.) 8 I 4 B 1 I 6 I 5 I a|'- Title:. 7. Dves B No AR Sute 72201 - ZIP Code + 4 324 2112 Fax#: (501 ) .324 -2115 E-Mail Address: livoung@lrsdadm. Irsd.kl2.ar.us Application Information 9. Type of Submission: PreApplication [3 Construction Non-Construction Application Construction 13 Non-Construction 10. Is application subject to review by Executive Order 12372 process? IXI Yes (Date made available to the Executive Order 12372 process for review): 12 /19 /2000 I I No (If "No." check appropriate box below.) 1 I Program is not covered by E.O. 12372. I 1 Program has not been selected by State for review. Start Date: End Date: Magnet Schools Assistance Program___________________ Type of Applicant (Enter appropriate letter in the box.) [Il A State B County C Municipal D Township Interstate F Intermunicipal G Special District H Independent School District I Public College or University J Private, Non-Profit College or University K Indian Tribe L Individual M Private, Profit-Making Organization N Other (Specify):_____________________ 8. Novice Applicant B Yes No 12. Are any research activities involving human subjects planned at any time during the proposed project period? Yes No 11. Proposed Project Dates: J7/^/200L Q6/2QQ4 Estimated Funding 14a. Federal b. Applicant c. State d. Local e. Other f. Program Income g. TOTAL RV. 11/12/99 a. If "Yes," Exemption(s) #' c. IRB approval date: s $ $ $ 5 s s lx] No b. /Assurance of Compliance #
OR I 1 Full IRB ar r~l Expedited Review 13. Descriptive Title of Applicants Project: Magnet Schools Assistance Program Propos. 1 Aiming for Excellence Authorized Representative Information 3,999,832 3,999,832 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 15. To the best of my knowledge and belief, all data in this preapplicationZapplication are true lU Uic ucsi u* Uiy luawvTivMgv uuw -------------- < t .j ri. r and correct. The document has been duly authorized by the governing body of the applicant and the applicant will comply with the attached assurances if the assistance is awarde . Typed Name of Authorized Representative Dr. Leslie V. Gamine b. Title Superintendent of Schools Tel.#: (501 ) 324 - 2012 Fax#: (501) 3^ .2146 d. E-Mail Address: e. Signature of Autl lvcami@lrsdadm.lrsd.kl2. ar. us Tzcd Represem IVI Datel2 zQ8/200g ED 424 assurances - NON-CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS 0MB Approval No. 0348-0040 hiirripn for this collection of information is estimated to average 15 minutes per response, includ. ing, time for reviewing Public reporting-b--u--r-d---e--n- for this coiieciio maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET. SEND IT TO THE ADDRESS PROVIDED BY THE SPONSORING AGENCY._______ If you have questions, please contact the is the case, you will be notified. As the duly authorized representative of the applicant, I certify that the applicant: 1. 2. Has the legal authority to apply for Federal assistance and the institutional, managerial and financial capability (including funds sufficient to pay the non-Federal share of project cost) to ensure proper planning, management and completion of the project described in this application. Will give the awarding agency, the Comptroller General of the United States and, if appropriate, the State, through any authorized representative, access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related to the award
and will establish a proper accounting system in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards or agency directives. 3. Will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their positions for a purpose that constitutes or presents the appearance of personal or organizational conflict of interest, or personal gain. 4. Will initiate and complete the work within the applicable time frame after receipt of approval of the awarding agency. 5 Will comply with the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 4728-4763) relating to prescribed standards for merit systems for programs funded under one of the 19 statutes or regulations specified in Appendix A of OPM's Standards for a Merit System of Personnel Administration (5 C.F.R. 900, Subpart F). 6. Will comply w..i.t.h. a-l l Federal statutes .relatingJ .t o. nondiscrimination. These include but are not limited to. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin
(b) Title IX of the Eduction Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. 1681- (a) 1683, and 1685-1686), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex
(c) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Previous Edition Usable 7. Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. 794), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicaps
(d) the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6101-6107), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age
(e) the Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972 (P.L. 92-255), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of dnjg abuse
(f) the Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-616). as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of alcohol abuse or alcoholism
(g) 523 and 527 of the Public Health Service Act of 1912 (42 U.S.C. 290 dd-3 and 290 ee 3), as amended, relating to confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records
(h) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C, 3601 et seq.), as amended, relaUng to nondiscrimination in the sale, rental or financing of housing
(i) any other nondiscrimination provisions in the specific statute(s) under which application for Federal assistance is being made
and, 0) the requirements of any other nondiscrimination statute(s) which may apply to the application. Will comply, or has already complied, with the requirements of Titles II and 111 of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646) which provide for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced or whose property is acquired as a result of Federal or federally-assisted programs. These requirements apply to all interests in real property acquired for project purposes purchases. regardless of Federal participation in 8. Will comply, as applicable, with provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. 1501-1508 and 7324-7328) which limit the political activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with Federal funds. Authorized for Local Reproduction standard Form 424B (Rev. 7-97) Prescribed by 0MB Circular A-102 9 Will comply, as applicable, with the provisions of the Davis- Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 276a to 276a-7), the Copeland Act (40 U.S.C. 276c and 18 U.S.C. 874), and the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 327- 333), regarding labor standards for federally-assisted construction subagreements. 10. Will comply, if applicable, with flood insurance purchase requirements of Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-234) which requires recipients in a special flood hazard area to participate in the program and to purchase flood insurance if the total cost of insurable construction and acquisition is $10,000 or more. 11. Will comply with environmental standards which may be prescribed pursuant to the following
(a) institution of environmental quality control measures under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (P.L. 91-190) and Executive Order (EO) 11514
(b) notification of violating facilities pursuant to EO 11738
(c) protection of wetlands pursuant to EO 11990
(d) evaluation of flood hazards in floodplains in accordance with EO 11988
(e) assurance of project consistency with the approved State management program developed under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1451 et seq.)
(f) conformity of Federal actions to State (Clean Air) Implementation Plans under Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act of 1955, as amended (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.)
(g) protection of underground sources of drinking water under the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, as amended (P.L. 93-523)
and. (h) protection of endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (P.L. 93- 205). 12. Will comply with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 (16 U.S.C. 1271 et seq.) related to protecting components or potential components of the national wild and scenic rivers system. 13. Will assist the awarding agency in assuring compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470), EO 11593 (identification and protection of historic properties), and the Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. 469a-1 et seq.). 14. Will comply with P.L. 93-348 regarding the protection of human subjects involved in research, development, and related activities supported by this award of assistance. 15. Will comply with the Laboratory Animal Welfare Act of 1966 (P.L. 89-544, as amended, 7 U.S.C. 2131 et seq.) pertaining to the care, handling, and treatment of warm blooded animals held for research, teaching, or other activities supported by this award of assistance. 16. Will comply with the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. 4801 et seq.) which prohibits the use of lead-based paint in construction or rehabilitation of residence structures. 17. Will cause to be performed the required financial and compliance audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and OMB Circular No. A-133. 18. Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations." Will comply with all applicable requirements of all other Federal laws, executive orders, regulations, and policies governing this program. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED CERTIFYING OFFICIAL TITLE Superintendent of Schools APPLICANT ORGANIZAVlpN Little Rock School District DATE SUBMITTED December 22, 2000 standard Form 4248 (Rev. 7-97) Back 1. Type of Federal Action: b. disclosure of lobbying activities Complete this form to disclose lobbying activities pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352 (See reverse for public burden disclosure.) ___________ ---------------------------------- , - .T_______________ , > _!___ In Dannrt Tune
2. Status of Federal Action: 3. Report Type: Approved by 0MB 0348-0046 a. contract b. grant c. cooperative agreement d. loan e. loan guarantee f. loan insurance_______ a a. bid/offer/application b. initial award c. post-award a. a. initial filing b. material change For Material Change Only: year quarter date of last report 4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity: 0 Prime I I Subawardee Tier_____ 5. If Reporting Entity in No. 4 is a and Address of Prime: Subawardee, Enter Name Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 , if known'. Congressional District, if known'. 6. Federal Department/Agency: Two U.S. Department of Educatim 8. Federal Action Number, if known: 10. a. Name and Address of Lobbying Registrant (if individual, last name, first name. Ml)'. N/A 11. authorized by tlno 31 U.S.C. sootton Z13J52S '-jrnatiB dniaccaau rwoa ao lP kitibSyftbnyo tahc.d dviUBa la .a. hm.artie rliaal trampraoaa.n^tabori ol tact c aritariKl Irito. Thia dl.Uo.ur, 1. rwulhid pur.u.ht m 31 W.C 135^ Wormatlori wilt be reported Io the CortBrea. Krrrwinhuelly ^d W^all^e public rapmSori. An, penmn B-o fail, to file the repuWrd ^ecl to e dtril pertelt, al not leu that 510.000 and not more than $100,000 for mrormalion nqirtlted BinxjBh ttlis torn is 31 U.S.C. 1352. This such failure. Federal Use Only
Congressional District, if known : 7. Federal Program Name/Description: CFDA Number, if applicable'. 9. Award Amount, if known: $______________________ ___________ ____________ b. Individuals Performing Services (including address if different from No. 10a) (last name, first name, Ml): Signature
_____ 4 Print Name: _ Title
_______ Telephone No. N/A TiPsuV V. Gamine Superintendent of Schools (501) 32A-2012 Date
12/22/00. Authorized for Local Reproduction Standard Form LLL (Rev. 7-97) INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETION OF SF-LLL, DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES This disclosure form shall be completed by the ^Tfil" action, or a material change to a previous filing, pursuant to btle 31 U.S.C^seotion 1352. Member of Congress, an officer or employeeof ppaayymmeenntt ttoo aannyy lloobbbbyyiinngg eenntUittyy ffoor^ linnfflluueennccilnngg oorr attemp^ng o m uen 1. Identify the type of covered Federal action for which lobbying activity is and/or has been secured to infiuence the outcome of a covered Federal action. 2. Identify the status of the covered Federal action. 3. Identify the --------- the year and quarter in which the change occurred. Enter action. 4. Enter the full name, address, city, State and the first subawardee of the reporting entity that designates if it Is, or limited to subcontracts, subgrants and contract awards under grants. of the prime is the 1st tier. Subawards include but are not 5. If the organization filing the report in item 4 Checks -Subawardee.-then enter the full name, address, city. State and zip code of the prime Federal recipient. Include Congressional District, if known. 6. Enter the name of the Federal agency making the award or loan commitment. Include at least one example. Department of Transportation. United States Coast Guard. organizationallevel below agency name, if known. For 7. Enter the Federal program name or description for the covered Federal action (Item 1). If known, enter the full Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number for grants, cooperative agreements, loans, and loan commitments. 8 Enter the most appropriate Federal Identifying number availablefor the Federal action identified in XmlXei ' Invitation for Bid (IFB) number, grant announcement "* " **" "---------------------- '' assigned by the Federal agency). Include prefixes, e.g.. RFP-DE-90-001. award number
the application/proposal control number 9, For a covered Federal action where there has been an award or loan commitment by the Federal agency, enter the Federal amount of the awardfioan commitment for the prime entity identified In Item 4 or 5. entity kJenlified in item 4 to influence the covered Federal action. (b) Enter the full names Middle Initial (Ml). of the Individual(s) performing services, and include full address dfiferent from 10 (a). Enter Last Name. First Name, and 11. The certifying official shall sign and date the form, print hisArer name. tiUe. and telephone number. collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB Control According to the Paperwork Reduction Act. as reporting burden for this collection of information is Number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection to OMB No.^M<^. PubK ,aitoining the data information. DC 20503. CERTIFICATIONS REGARDING LOBBYING
DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION AND OTHER SoSlI^^TTERS
AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS Annlicants should refer to the regulations cited below to ddeetteerrmmiinnee tthhee cceerrttiiffiiccaattiioonn ttoo wwhhiicchh tthheeyy aarree rreeqquuiirreeud to attest. Applicants ?Govemment-wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurer^nOjan Hacked wheMhe'^ (Grants)." The certifications shall be treated as a material representation of fact upon which reliance will be placed when the Departrnent of Education determines to award the covered transaction, grant, or cooperative agreement. 1. LOBBYING As required by Section 1352, Title 31 of the U.S. Code, and implemented at 34 CFR Part 82, for persons entering into a grant or cooperative agreement over $100,000, as defined at 34 CFR Part 82, Sections 82.105 and 82.110, the applicant certifies that
(a) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the making of any Federal grant, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal grant or cooperative agreement
(b) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress In connection with this Federal grant or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form - LLL, Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instnjctions
(c) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subgrants, contracts under grants and cooperative agreements, and subcontracts) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. (c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (2)(b) of this certification
and (d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application had one or more public transaction (Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause or default
and B. Where the applicant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, he or she shall attach an explanation to this application. 3. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (GRANTEES OTHER THAN INDIVIDUALS) As required by the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988, and implemented at 34 CFR Part 85, Subpart F, for grantees, as defined at 34 CFR Part 85, Sections 85.605 and 85.610 - A. The applicant certifies that it will or will continue to provide a drug-free workplace by
(a) Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, disUibution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee s workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for 2. DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS As required by Executive Order 12549, Debarment and Suspension, and implemented at 34 CFR Part 85, for prospec- five p articipants in primary cover_e_d1 t..r_a_n__saatctions, as detineo at 34 CFR Part 85, Sections 85.105 and 85.110 A. The applicant certifies that it and its principals: (a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency. violation of such prohibition
(b) Establishing an on-going drug-free awareness program to infomi employees about
(1) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace
(2) The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace
(3) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs
and (4) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drag abuse violations occurring in the workplace
(c) Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph (a)
(b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application been convicted of or had a civil judgement rendered (d) Notifying the employee in the statement required by para- g' ra' ph (a.) that, as a condition of employment Iu innHdAerr ftkhae ngrroanntt, the against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in co nnection w...i.t..h.. ..o..b...t.a...i.n ing, .a. ttempt_i_nrgiA trof norbmtianirn, or perfomning a public (Federal, State, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction
violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery. employee will: (1) Abide by the terms of the statement
and (21 Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false later than five calendar days after such conviction. statements, or receiving stolen property
(e) Notifying the agency, in writing, within 10 calendar days after receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2) from an ernployee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title, to: Director, Grants Policy and Oversight Staff, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, S.W. (Room 3652, GSA Regional Office Building No. 3), Washington, DC 20202- 4248. Notice shall include the identification number(s) of each affected grant
(f) Taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar days of ' ' . _______L* t.rifh raenort tn anv III I onii a---------- receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2), with respect to any employee who is so convicted: (1) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an ' ' ..................... ._______oo<.M>ie>tanf lAiith t em- ^1^ 1 aixii ly tij-'i-'* r ** . ... .. ployee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended
or (2) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug ' ' . . .....x!_______ for ftiinn abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency
DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (GRANTEES WHO ARE INDIVIDUALS) As required by the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988, and implemented at 34 CFR Part 85, Subpart F. for grantees, as defined at 34 CFR Part 85, Sections 85.605 and 85.610- A. As a condition of the grant, I certify that I will not engage in the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance in conducting any activity with the grant
and B. If convicted of a criminal drug offense resulting from a violation occurring during the conduct of any grant activity, I will report the conviction, in writing, within 10 calendar days of the conviction, to
Director, Grants Policy and Oversight Staff, Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, S.W. (Room 3652, GSA Regional Office Building No. 3), Washington, DC 20202-4248. Notice shall include the identification number(s) of each affected grant. (g) Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a iviarjiiy a y-wv ------- drug-free workplace through implementation of paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f). B. The grantee may insert in the space provided below the site(s) for the performance of work done in connection with the specific grant
Place of Perfonnance (Street address, city, county, state, zip code) Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Little Rock, Pulaski, AR 72201 Check [ ] if there are workplaces on file that are not identified here. As the duly authorized representative of the applicant, 1 hereby certify that the applicant will comply with the above certifications. NAME OF APPLICANT Little Rock School District PR/AWARD NUMBER AND / OR PROJECT NAME Magnet Schools Assistance Program PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Leslie V. Gamine Superin teendent of Schools SIGNATURE DATE December 22, 2000 12/98 ED 80-0013Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineiigibiiity and Voluntary Exciusion Lower Tier Covered Transactions t of Education regulations implementing Executive Order 12549. Debarment and Suspension, 34 CFR certiticauon oy me ue|jaiui,o,.i oi coucauun ioyuiouu,.o v a .-n Part 85, for all lower ber transactions meeting the threshold and tier requirements stated at Section 85.110. This certification is required by the Department Instructions for Certification 1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective lower tier 6. The prospective lower tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility, and Voluntary Exclusion-Lower participant is providing the certification set out below. Tier Covered Transactions." without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered 2. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was entered into. If. it. is. l ater d...e..t.e..r.m....i.n.e. d .t.h..a...t. .t.h..e.. .p. frioosrp nencrttiivre.in lao'wer tier parbcipant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the departmen or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment. 3 The prospective lower tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the person to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective lower tier participant learns that its certitica- _ J __ rternriATH IC hu tion was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. 4. The terms covered transaction," debaiTed, susperided," ineligible," lower tier covered transaction," participant,"" person, primary covered transaction,"" principal," proposal," and volumarily excluded,' as used in this clause, have the meanings set out in me Definitions and Coverage sections of rules implementing Executive Order 12549. You may contact the person to which this proposal is submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations. 5. The prospective lower tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered ^nsarton. unless authorized by the department or agency with which this transaction originated. transactions. 7. A parttcipant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant may decide the method and frequency by which it determines the eligibility of its principals. Each participant may but is not required to. check the Nonprocurement List. 8. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the cerfificabon required by this clause. The knowledge and informaUon of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings. 9. EExxcceepptt ffoorr ttrraannssaaccttiioonnss aauutthhoornizzeeda uunndoeerr ppaarraaggrraapphn 5u uoif tuh.ecoseo instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is suspended, debamed, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment. Certification (1) The orosoective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this proposal, that neither it nor suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntanly excluded from participation in its principals are presently debarred, in this transaction by any Federal department or agency. (2) Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in attach an explanation to this proposal. NAME OF APPLICANT Little Rock School District________ PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Leslie V. Gamine Superintendent of Schools___________ _ SIGNATURE in this certification, such prospective participant shall PR/AWARD NUMBER AND/OR PROJECT NAME Magnet Schools Assistance Program DATE December 22, 20CMD ED 80-0014, 9/90 (Replaces GCS-009 (REV.12/88), which is obsolete) I I MAGNET SCHOOLS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ASSURANCES In accordance with section 5106(b)(2) of the Improving America's Schools Act of 1994, the applicant hereby assures and certifies that it (1) will use funds under this part for the purposes specified in section 5102 of the Improving America's Schools Act of 1994
(2) will employ teachers in the courses of instruction assisted under this part who are certified or licensed by the State to teach, or supervise others who are teaching, the subject matter of the courses of instruction
(3) will not engage in discrimination based on race, religion, color, national origin, sex or disability in the hiring, promotion, or assignment of employees of the agency or oth personnel for whom the agency has any administrative responsibility, (4) will not engage in discrimination based on race, religion, color, national ongin, sex or disability in the assignment of students to schools or to courses of instruction within the schools of the agency, except to carry out the approved plan
(5) will not engage in discrimination based on race, religion, color, national origin, sex or disability in designing or operating extracurricular activities for students. (6) will carry out a high-quality education program that will encourage greater parental decisionmaking and involvement
and (7) will give students residing in the local attendance area of the proposed magnet ' ' - .... __X- _ X_in thnco nrniortc school projects equitable consideration for placement in those projects. FOR THOSE APPLICANTS THAT HAVE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED REQUIRED DESEGREGATION PLANS The applicant hereby assures and certifies that it is implementing that desegregation plan as approved. Signature i^f Authorized _ lature Representative 12/22/00 Date FY 2001 Magnet Schools Assistance Program Application Section D (Required Forms) - Page 18Certification of EligibiUty for Federal Assistance in Certain Programs I understand that J4 CFR 75.60,75.61, and 75.62 require that I make specific certifications of eligibiltty to the U.S. Department of Education as a condition of applying to Federal funds in certain progtarre m4 tot these requnemmts are r to any other eligibility toquiraneats that toe U.S. Department of Education miposet under program regulations. are m Under 34 CFR 75.60 - 7S.62: L I certify that k. I do not owe a debt, or I am current in repaying a debt, or I am not in default (as that term is used at 34 CFR Part 668) on a debt: I. To the Federal Qovenment under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., a previous loan, scholarship, grant, or cooperative agreement)
or 2. For a feUowshjp, scholarship, stipend, discretionary grant, or loan in any program of the U. Department of Education that is sulgect to 34 CFR 75.60,7S.61, and 75.62, including
Fcdscal Pell Grant Program (20 U AC 1070a, et seq.)
n,.4>pii Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant (SEOG) Program (20 UAC. 1070(b), et mq.): State Student Incentive Grant Program (SSIG) 20 U.S.C- 1070c, et seq.). Federal Loan Ptugtam (20 U.S,C 1087aa, et aeq-X Irtoome OvutetMU I^jceet Loan Dentonsttation Project (20 U.S.C 1087a, note)
p,t>nil Stafford Loan Program, Federal Supplemental Loans for Students [SLS], Federal PLUS, or Federal Consolidation Loan Program (20 UAC. 1071, ct seq.), Cuban Student Loan Program (20 U.S.C 2601, ct aeq.), Robert C Byrd Honors Seb^eship Program (20 UAC 1070d-31, et seq.)
Jacob K. Javits Fellows Program U5.C 1134h-11341): Patricia Roberts Barris Fellowdiip Program (20 U.S.C. 1134d-1134g)
Christa M'^^iitifTe Fellowtiup Program (20 UAC. 110S-ll05i): Biimprat Bducation FcHowship Program (20 U.S.C 3221-3262)
p >4whnwt
nn 1 .<mg.Tenn Traiinag Program (29 UA.C 774(b))
Paul Douglas Teacher Sobolatship Program (20 UAC. 1104, et aeq.)
T w P.wffweement EducatioQ Program (42 U.S.C. 3775), Indian FcDowtiiip Program (29 UAC. 774(b))
OR B. I have made arrangements aatisftcWiy to the U.S. Department of Bducation to re^y a <k*t as desaOit^ A.L or A.2. (above) on which X had not been current in repaying or on which I was m default (as that term IS used m 34 CFRPartd^ u. I eatlftr also ttat 1 have not iKca deelarad by a judge, as a eootfitiM of seateacir^ n^ i^l^^U3^^^^toniC
Weralai.tnfctti.epe,iodoftto 1 taderstand that provSdiitf a &lse coti&atioo So any of the ftateawits abotre makes me li^ to repaymmt to to Ui Dtoot^ f Edaeatico to oo to basis of this oestifieatioo, to ewfl pouiliei, and to enimaal ptoaeeuhoo under 18 U5.C 1001. -Cr (Sigaattue) December 15, 2000 (Date) Leslie V. Carnine, Superintendent (Typed et Printed Name) . ... j_Mamet Schools Assistance Mime w Bnmber of to USOB program under which thu eethficalwo k being imdc
_ , Program Proposal "Aiming for ExcellenceIt BD 804016 (f/n) I Little Rock, Arkansas LITTLE ROCK MSAP SUMMARY YEAR1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 TOTAL FAIR HIGH SCHOOL Direct costs McClellan high school Direct costs MABELVALE MIDDLE SCHOOL Direct costs CLOVERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL Direct costs MAGNET OFFICE Direct costs $796,374 $1,015,354 $837,985 $789,430 $296,225 $1,092,780 $794,320 $759,813 $815,748 $272,664 $937,926 $875,664 $739,531 $822,617 $272,441 $2,827,080 $2,685,338 $2,337,329 $2,427,795 $841,330 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $3,735,368 $3,735,327 $3,648,177 $11,118,873 Personnel Fringe Benefits Travel Equipment Supplies Contractual Construction Other Direct costs $935,220 $179,084 $101,296 $701,517 $1,129,587 $196,500 $0 $492,164 $3,735,368 $958,434 $182,294 $98,192 $474,603 $1,215,128 $182,500 $0 $624,176 $3,735,327 $1,012,140 $189,719 $82,672 $285,862 $1,402,840 $182,500 $0 $459,842 $3,615,575 $2,905,794 $551,098 $282,160 $1,461,982 $3,747,555 $561,500 $0 $1,576,182 $11,086,271 Indirect Costs @.0708 7.0800% $264,464 $264,461 $255,983 $784,908 Total Little Rock $3,999,833 $3,999,788 $3,871,558 $11,871,179 Little Rock MSAP Summary/ Page 1 Uttte Rock, Arkansas FAIR HIGH SCHOOL ITEM PA6ERERENCE ------- ----------------------------YEAR ONE UNIT PRICE NUMBER COST little rock ARKANSAS________ _ YEAR TWO YEAR THREE PERSONNEL Curriculum Coordinator I Medical Studies Lead Teacher Environental Science Lead Teacher Information Science Lead Teacher 32 33 33 $52,000 $48,500 $48,500 $48,500 1.0 1-0 $53,560 $49,440 $49,4401 $49,440 ^l 1.0 $55,167 $50,923 $50,9231 $50,923 1.0 i.ol 1.0 $58,4n $53,978 $53,978! $53,978 SUBTOTAL PERSONNEL 4.0 $201,880 4.0 $207,936 4.0 $220,412 FRINGE BENEFITS ARReBrement Redrement/Soc Sec. Woriwrs Compensation I Unemployment Health Insurance n/a n/8 n/a n/a n/a 12.00% 0.77% 0.87% 0.19% $2,620 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.ol $24,226 $1,544 $1,756 $3861 $10,480 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.01 4.0 $24,952 $1,591 $1,809 $3971 $10,480 4.01 4.0 4.0 4.01 4.0 $26,449 $1,686 $1,918 $4211 $10,480 SUBTOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS $38,392 $39,229 $40,964 IBAMEL Site VIsItato Magnet Schools MSAP Annual Meeting MSA Annual Conference 117 117 117 $778 $896' $1,200 4.0 2.0 2.0 $3,104 $1.7901 $2,400 4.0 2.0 2.0 $3,104 $1,7901 $2,400 0.0 2.0) 2.0 $0 $1,79o! $2,400 $7,294 $7,294 $4,190 ISUBTOTAL TRAVEL EQUIPMENT I Medical Anatomical Torso Electon Microscope Medical Sciences Lab I Environmental I Ecosystems & Environmental Lab I Greenhouse 123 123 123 134 134 $8,860 $6,0001 $66,000 $126,000 $46,000 0.0 0.5 0.51 $0 1.0 $6,650 $32,500 $62,500 Fair High School / Page 1 1.0 0.5 0.5 1.0 $5,000 $32,500 $62,500 $45,000 UtUe Rock, Arkansas Smart Boards Pond aiKl Deck KH Clhnatarium Greenhouse Annex Kit Information Sclenca Systems Engineering A Info. Sci. Lab 134 134 134 134 113 SUBTOTAL EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES Information Science Comp^Aar vri monitor Personal Printers Color Laser Printer Student Computer Furniture Digital Cameras Digital Camcorder Fax Machine Super VMS VCR w/Large Monitor PC Cameras Computer Software Computer Supplies Scanners Laptop Computers Medical Computer w/ monitor Personal Printers Computer Furniture Palm Pllota Disposable Aprons, Glovea, Masks Human Muscular Skelelon Human Muscular & Ligament Skeleton Double Stethoscope Student Stethoscope Virtual Reality Dissection Lab Mlnl-Gel Electrophoresis Kit 113 113 113 113 113 113 113 113 113 113 113 113 113 123 123 123 123 123 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 $15,000 $10,000 $6,000 $6,000 $80,000 $2,100 $325 $3,900 $440 $599 $899 $150 $1,000 $119 $25,000 $1,500 $399 $1,199 $2,100 $325 $440 $399 $300 $1,600 $800 $25 $18 $2,000 $155 1.0 0.0 0.5 10.0 5.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 4.0 20.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 1.0 0.1.0 1.0 3.I .0 30.0 $15,000 $0 $40,000 $21,000 $1,625 $0 $4,400 $0 $0 $150 $238 $25,000 $9,000 $1,596 $23,980 $10,500 $1,625 $2,200 $0 $300 $0 $800 $75 $540 $160,000 Fair High School / Page 2 0.0 1.0 0.5 20.0 10.0 1.0 20.0 3.0 5.0 0.0 2.0 15.0 1.0 6.0 75.0 5.0 5.1 5.1 .0 .0 20.0 1.0 1.0 1.1.0 1..10 30.1.0 $0 $10,000 $40,000 $42,000 $3,250 $3,900 $8,800 $1,797 $4,495 $0 $2,000 $1,785 $25,000 $9,000 $69,925 $10,500 $1,625 $2,200 $7,980 $300 $1,600 $800 $0 $2,000 $4,650 0.0 4.0 1.0 0.0 $0 $20,000 $5,000 $0 $196,000 25.0 10.0 2.0 25.0 3.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 6.0 3.0 125.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 20.0 1.0 0.1 2.1 $31,660 .0 .0 30.10 $52,500 $3,250 $7,800 $11,000 $1,797 $4,495 $0 $0 $25,000 $9,000 $1,197 $149,875 $31,500 $1,625 $6,600 $7,980 $300 $0 $50 $0 $4,650 Little Rock, Arkansas DNA Analysis Package Ethidium Bromide i Methylene Electronic CPR Mannequin Economy CPR Mannequin 1 Anatomical Fitness Equipment I Incubators I Human Torso I Video Microcopy System I Dental Instruments I Microcentrifuge I Human Prenancy Set I Potymerasa Chain Reaction Machine I Computerized Microscope I Spectrophotometer I Electrocardiogram Machine I Electrophoresis Chamber I Electrophoresis Power Supply I Histology Slides I Gel Viewing Box I Adam Interactlvo Anatomy I Cardio Tranduees I Biofeedback Equipment I Pulse Monitor I Human Ear Model I Human Eye Model I Urinary System I Larynx & Tongue I Mannequins I Medical Diagnostic Kits I Medical Supplies I Medical Software and Videos {Medical Books and Subcriptlons 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 125 125 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 126 126 126 123 123 123 125 125 125 125 $4,6351 $3,915 $750 $210 $5,000| $278 $1,415 $2,800 $2,000 $2,400 $875 $2,500 $2,500 $724 $2,8501 $199 $19o| $1,000 $500 $1,295 $i,ooo| $2,0001 $135 $28o| $285 $4io| $250 $750 $3,488 $5,000 $2,5001 $3,000 1.0 2.0 6.0 0.0 1.0 5.1.0 .0 .0 $4,635 $1,500 $1,260 $0 $1,415 1.1 1.1 1 1 .0 .0 $3,750 $3,488 $5,000 $2,500 $3,000 Environmental Computers w/MonItore Personal Printers Computer Furniture Palm Pilots 134 134 134 134 $2,100 $325 $440 $399 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 $10,500 $1,625 $2,200 $0 Fair High School I Page 3 0.0 2.0 1.0 6.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 6.0 1.0 6.0 6.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 15.1.0 1. 1 1 1 .0 .0 .0 1.0 10. 1 1.0 .0 1.1.0 1 1 .0 .0 15.0 5.0 15.0 20.0 $0 $7,830 $750 $1,260 $15,000 $834 $2,800 $2,000 $2,400 $875 $2,500 $2,500 $4,344 $2,850 $1,194 $1,140 $1,000 $500 $0 $0 $2,000 $2,025 $280 $285 $410 $250 $7,500 $3,488 $5,000 $2,500 $3,000 $31,500 $1,625 $6,600 $7,980 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.( 0.1 .0 .0 0.0 0.1.0 1 1 .0 .0 15.0 5.0 15.0 20.0 $0 $0 $5,000 $2,000 $2,850 $199 $1,000 $0 $1,295 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 $2,500 $31,500 $1,625 $6,600 $7,980 Little Rock, Arkansas CBL Calculator ElectronI Balances w/computer 32 Smart Card TV taWo Stereo MIcroscpes Spectrophotometer Mobile Carts General Lab Equipment Environmental Test Kits Environmental Supplies Environmental VWeos/DVD Environmental Reference Books Environmental Periodicals Student Safety Sot Student Microscopes Brock Student Microscopes Fish Growth Pond (Indoors) Video Camera/MonItor/MIcroscope Screen Video Projector DIgItat Camera Quick Pad VCR/DVD Player Lumen Projector Video Documentation Review Cntr Multimedia Projector Laser Printer SUBTOTAL SUPPUES CONTRACTUAL Technology Malntonanco SUBTOTAL CONTRACTUAL qiueb Field Trip Admisslone end Meals UALR Summer Systems Engineering & Information Sciences Program for 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 113 110 110 $700 $400 $2,000 $1,000 $1,500 $200 $200 $100 $6,000 $4,000 $3,000 $3,000 $100 $500 $200 $1,000 $2,000 $2,000 $599 $3,995 $400 $1,500 $3,500 $4,500 $1,000 $25,000 4.0 10.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 10.0 30.0 100.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 60.0 20.0 10.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 $2,800 $4,000 $0 $2,000 $3,000 $2,000 $6,000 $10,000 $6,000 $4,000 $3,000 $3,000 $6,000 $10,000 $2,000 $1,000 $2,000 $2,000 $0 $7,990 $400 $0 $0 $0 $2,000 $223,092 $25,000 $11,400 Fair High School I Page 4 10.0 10.0 2.0 100.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 20.0 10.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 $7,000 $4,000 $0 $0 $3,000 $0 $0 $10,000 $6,000 $4,000 $3,000 $3,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,990 $7,990 $400 $1,500 $3,500 $4,500 $0 $421,707 $25,000 $14,675 $25,000 10.0 10.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 100.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 20.0 10.0 2.0 1.0 1.1.0 $7,000 $4,000 $2,000 $2,000 $3,000 $0 $0 $10,000 $6,000 $4,000 $3,000 $3,000 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,990 $7,990 $0 $1,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $15,725 MS<.64< $25,000 Little Rock, Arkansas 100 -150 freshmen each year Staff Dwelopmant Teacher Leadership Development Project Based Learning Inshucttonal Planning Thematic Teaching 4 Curriculum Scientific Inquiry Socratic Seminar Cooperative Learning Information Science Medical Investigations Environmental Science Cunfeulum Developmont Sys. Engineering 4 Information Scl. Environmental Science Medical Sciences Internal Signage External Signage 400.0 100.0 $40,000 100.0 $40,000 150.0 $60,000 SUBTOTAL TOTAL DIRECT TOTAL FAIR HIGH SCHOOL 136 136 136 136 136 136 136 131 120 138 108 131 120 113 113 $5,382 $5,382 $5,382 $1,170 $5,796 $6,210 $5,796 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 $10,000 $10,000 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1,0 1.0 1.0 $5,382 $5,382 $5,382 $1,170 $0 $0 $0 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 $10,000 $0 $160,716 $796,374 $798,374 Fair High School / Page 5 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.5 1.0 0.8 2.0 2.0 $0 $0 $5,382 $1,755 $5,796 $6,210 $5,796 $30,000 $12,000 $9,000 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 $10,000 $20,000 $196,814 $1,092,780 $1,092,780 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 0.8 0.0 $0 $0 $0 $2,340 $5,796 $6,210 $0 $24,000 $12,000 $9,000 $12,000 $12,000 $0 $0 $159,071 $937,926 $937326 I UtUe Rock, Arkansas McClellan high school YEAR ONE ITEM PAOERERENCE UNIT PRICE NUMBER COST SUBTOTAL NUMBER COST I ITTLE ROCK ARKANSAS_________ YEAR TWO YEAR THREE subtotal number cost SUBTOTAL PERSONNEL Curriculum Coordinator Engineering Lead Teacher Business S Finance Lead Teacher Multi-Media Lead Teacher 32 33 33 33 $52,000 $48,500 $48,500 $48,500 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 $53,560 $49,440 $49,440 $49,440 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 $55,167 $50,923 $50,923 $50,923 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 $58,477 $53,978 $53,978 $53,978 SUBTOTAL PERSONNEL FRINGE BENEFITS AR Rettrwnent ReHfwnenVSoc Sec. Wortcets Compensation Unemployment Health Insurance n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 12.00% 0.77% 0.87% 0.19% $2,620 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 $24,226 $1,544 $1,756 $386 $10,480 $201,880 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 $24,952 $1,591 $1,809 $397 $10,480 $207,936 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 $26,449 $1,686 $1,918 $421 $10,480 $220,412 SUBTOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL Site Visits to Magnet Schools MSAP Annual Meeting MSA Annual Conference IB Conference Fall IB Conference Spring National Academy Conference Project Lead the IN ay Conference SUBTOTAL TRAVEL EQUIPMENT International Baccalaureate Mobile Wireless Language Lab Engineering $38,392 $39,229 $40,964 194 194 194 194 194 194 194 184 $n6 $896 $1,200 $1,200 $1,200 $1,600 $1,172 $22,000 4.0 2.1.0 2.0 6.1.0 6.0 4.1.0 3.1.0 $3,104 $1,790 $2,400 $7,200 $7,200 $6,000 $3,516 $31,210 McClellan High School I Page 1 4.0 2.0 2.0 6.( 6.( 4.1 .0 .0 .0 3.1.0 1 .0 $3,104 $1,790 $2,400 $7,200 $7,200 $6,000 $3,516 $31,210 0.0 2.1.0 2.0 6.0 6.1.0 4.0 3.1.0 $0 $1,790 $2,400 $7,200 $7,200 $6,000 $3,516 $28,106 $22,000 Little Rock, Arkansas Dell Poweredge 9400 Automated Manufacturing Pacitage Engineering Lab MulO Media Multi Media Studio Center Business & Finance Smart Boards I Business & Finance Center SUBTOTAL EQUIPMENT SUPOJES Multi Media Computer w/ rtxxiltor Personal Printers Color Laser Printer Student Computer Furniture pigltal Cameras I Digital Camcorder I Fax Machine I Super VMS VCR w/Large Monitor I PC Cameras I Computer Software I Computer Supplies I Scanners I Laptop Computers I Engineering I Computer wl monitor I Personal Printers I Computer Furniture I HP Design Jet Printer LaserJet Printer I Palm Pilots IPLTW Engineering Mt 1 IPLTW Engineering Mt 2 I PLTW Engineering Mt 3 I PLTW Engineering Mt 4 212 212 212 200 191 181 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 212 212 212 212 212 212 212 212 212 212 $38,780 $28,723 $76418 $60,000 $15,000 $80,000 $2,100 $325 $3,900 $940 $599 $899 $150 $1,000 $119 $25,000 $1,500 $399 $1,199 $2,100 $325 $440 $4,632 $1,310 $399 $4,988 $4,575 $4,650 $5,099 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 15.0 5.0 2.0 15.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.1 6.1 .0 .0 4.0 50.0 15.( 5.1 .0 .0 15.0 1.1 1.1 .0 .0 10.I.O 1.1.0 0.1.0 $0 $0 $75,418 $60,000 $30,000 $80,000 $31,500 $1,625 $7,800 $14,100 $599 $899 $150 $238 $25,000 $9,000 $1,596 $59,950 $31,500 $1,625 $6,600 $4,632 $1,310 $3,990 $4,988 $0 00 $0 $246,418 15.0 5.0 2.0 15.0 1.0 5.0 0.0 1.0 10.0 1.0 6.0 75.0 5.1.0 5.0 5.1.0 10.0 0.0 1 .0 $22,000 McClellan High School / Page 2 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 $39,799 $28,723 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $68,622 $31,500 $1,625 $7,800 $14,100 $599 $4,495 $0 $1,000 $1,190 $25,000 $9,000 $89,925 $10,500 $1,625 $2,200 $0 $0 $3,990 $0 $4,575 15.0 5.0 2.0 15.0 1.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 6.0 3.0 125.1.0 5.0 5.( 5.1 .0 .0 20.0 0.1.0 1 1 .0 .0 $31,500 $1,625 $7,800 $14,100 $599 $4,495 $0 $0 $25,000 $9,000 $1,197 $149,875 $10,500 $1,625 $2,200 $0 $0 $7,980 $0 $4,650 $5,099 Little Rock, Arkansas Lightware Scout Projector Fluke Multimeter w/leads Digital Oeclllloscope Parallax Basic Stamp Nt Multl-Purpoae Workbench POE Supplemental Nt DIglmatIc Mini Priceasor Calper Nt POE Full Nt Discovery I Pneumatic Nt Motors & Generators System Stnicture Stress Analyzer Tenalte Tester Top Loading Adapter Engineering Materials Engineering Software Engineering Vldeoa, DVD, Books 212 212 212 212 212 212 212 212 212 212 212 212 212 212 212 212 $2,543 $160 $335 $132 $336 $65 $510 $1,055 $1,715 $1,297 $2,800 $350 $250 $15,000 $8,000 $5,000 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 $2,543 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $8,000 $5,000 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 $0 $320 $335 $132 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $8,000 $5,000 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 4.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 $0 $0 $0 $132 $672 $260 $510 $4,220 $1,715 $1,297 $2,800 $350 $250 $15,000 $8,000 $5,000 Business & Finance Computers w/Monltors Color Laser Printers Computer Fumlturo Palm Pilots Flatbed Scanners LCD Projector FHIng Cabinets CD-RW Laptop Computers Magazine Racka Easels National Academy Materials Business S Finance VIdeos/DVD Buelnesa & Finance Reference Books Business 8. Finance Periodicals Computer Software & licenses Pentium IV Senrer Media Tower Work Station Contemporary Training Series Nt Digital Camera VCR/DVD Player 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 $2,100 $2,200 $940 $399 $300 $4,000 $75 $300 $1,800 $450 $300 $1,000 $4,000 $3,000 $3,000 $8,000 $3,000 $7,000 $5,000 $599 $400 15.0 5.0 15.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 9.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1.0 1.0 0.1.0 0.0 1.1.0 $31,500 $11,000 $14,100 $0 $300 $4,000 $375 $600 $3,600 $0 $900 $9,000 $4,000 $3,000 $3,000 $8,000 $3,000 $7,000 $0 $0 $400 McClellan High School I Page 3 5.0 1.0 5.0 60.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.( 10.1 .0 .0 1.1.0 $10,500 $2,200 $4,700 $23,940 $300 $4,000 $0 $600 $3,600 $1,350 $0 $0 $4,000 $3,000 $3,000 $8,000 $0 $0 $5,000 $5,990 $400 5.0 1.0 1.0 60.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 10.0 $10,500 $2,200 $940 $23,940 $300 $0 $0 $300 $3,600 $0 $0 $0 $4,000 $3,000 $3,000 $8,000 $0 $0 $10,000 $5,990 $0 I Little Rock, Arkansas SUBTOTAL SUPPLIES ICONTRACTUAL Technology Maintenance 191 $29,000 $341,420 1.0 $25,000 $318,491 $393,221 1.0 $25,000 SUBTOTAL CONTRACTUAL OTHER FleW Trip Admissions and Meals Staff Development Protect Lead the Way Protect Based Learning Instnjcttooal Planning mematlc Teaching & Curriculum Scientific Inquiry I Multiple Intelligences I Cooperative Learning I Engineering iMullFMedla & Graphic Design I Business 4 Finance I Curriculum Development I Engineering I Multi-Media 4 Graphic Design I Business 4 Finance I International Baccalaureate Feee iNAFFee I Internal Signage I External Signage 188 193 193 193 193 193 193 193 193 193 193 216 204 194 184 192 192 192 SUBTOTAL TOTAL DIRECT [total McClellan high school $29,000 $29,000 $29,000 $10,000 $12,000 $15,000 $2,100 $5,382 $5,382 $1,170 $5,796 $6,210 $5,796 $12,000 $12,000 $10,000 $15,000 $10,000 $10,000 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1.0 1.0 $2,100 $5,362 $5,382 $1,170 $0 $0 $0 $12,000 $12,000 $10,000 $12,000 $12,000 $10,000 $10,000 $20,000 $10,000 $0 $132,034 $1,016,394 $1,016,364 McClellan High School / Page 4 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1.0 2.1.0 2.0 $2,100 $0 $5,382 $1,170 $5,796 $6,210 $5,796 $12,000 $12,000 $10,000 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 $10,000 $20,000 $190,494 $794,320 $794,320 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.(.0 1.0 $2,100 $0 $5,382 $1,170 $5,796 $0 $0 $12,000 $12,000 $10,000 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 $0 $0 $99,448 $879,664 $879,664 LiWe Rock, Arkansas MABELVALE MIDDLE SCHOOL ITEM PAGE REFERENCE UNIT PRICE NUMBER YEAR ONE COST SUBTOTAL NUMBER LITTLE ROCK ARKANSAS yeartw ' COST SSUUBBTTOOTTAALL NNUUMMBBEERR COST wee SUBTOTAL PERSONNEL Cunleulum Coordinator Medical Investlgallona Load Teacher Envlronental Science Load Teacher Information Sdonco Load Teacher 32 33 33 33 $52,000 $48,500 $48,500 $48,500 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 $53,560 $49,440 $49,440 $49,440 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 $55,167 $50,923 $50,923 $50,923 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 $58,477 $53,978 $53,978 $53,978 SUBTOTAL PERSONNEL FRINGE BENEFITS ARRodroment RaUramont/Soc Sec. Workers Compensation Unamploymsnt Health Insurance n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 12.00% 0.77% 0.87% 0.19% $2,620 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 $24,226 $1,544 $1,756 $366 $10,480 $201,880 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 $24,952 $1,591 $1,809 $397 $10,480 $207,936 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 $26,449 $1,686 $1,918 $421 $10,480 $220,412 SUBTOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS TRAVEL sna VlaHa to Maflnat Schoda MSAP Annual Meeting MSA Annual Contorence SUBTOTAL TRAVEL EQUIPMENT MtdIctI ExardssBlko Troedmitl Smart Board Autodava Medical Investigattonss Lab EnWronmenta/ Environmental Studies Center Greenhouse Multi Media Projector Twelve Station Ub TaMo Smart Board InformtOon Sclmc* InFoCom Tech Center Cinema Screen Monitor Smart Board $38,392 $39,229 $40,964 163 163 163 169 169 169 169 169 172 172 172 172 172 148 148 148 $ne $896 $1,200 $6,116 $6,386 $16,000 $68,996 $60,000 $76,000 $49,610 $5,300 $6460 $16,000 $76,000 $7,999 $16,000 12.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 1.0 0. 1.5 2 0.0 0.!.5 $9,312 $3,580 $4,600 $17,692 $0 $50,000 $37,500 $12,900 $0 $37,500 $0 $0 Mabehzale Middle School / Page 1 6.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 0.<.0 0.1.0 0.1.5 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.0 0. 0. 0.1.0 $6,208 $3,580 $4,800 $5,115 $5,385 $0 $0 $37,500 $49,610 $5,300 $37,500 $0 $0 0.0 4.0 4.0 $0 $3,580 $4,800 $14,688 1.0 1.0 4i..O 1.0 0I..O 1.0 1.0 $8,380 $15,000 $58,995 $25,800 $15,000 $0 $7,999 $15,000 Little Rock, Arkansas Sound Board Mixer Studio Video Camera Blue Screen Video Editing Kit Multi Media Projector 148 148 148 148 $17,999 $10,000 $8,000 $5,300 $0 $0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 $0 $5,300 1.0 2.0 $5,000 $10,600 $0 SUBTOTAL EQUIPMENT SUEEUES Intbrmatfon Science Computer w/ monitor Netwoilc Servera Laser Printers Color Laser Printer Student Computer Furniture Digital Cameras DIgttil Camcorder Media Editor Palmcorder tur Portable Screen Sound System Planner Boards External RW CD Unlntarrupted Power Source Tapa Back-Up System PaImPilol Projection Stand Projection Tables Conterancs Phono Super VHS VCR w/Largo Monitor Video Conferencing Camera Compular Software Computer Supplies Scanners Laptop Computers Medical Computet eil monitor Network Server Uninterrupted Power Source Laser Printers Computer Furniture Palm Pllob Dbposabla Aprons, Gloves, Masks Lab Fumiturs Human Muscubr & Ligament Skeleton Storage CaUneb Physician Scale Sanitizing Cabinet 148 148 148 148 148 148 148 148 148 148 148 148 148 148 148 148 148 148 148 148 148 148 148 148 148 159 158 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 $137,900 $136,210 $163,394 $2,100 $3,000 $1,000 $3,900 $840 $599 $899 $2,299 $549 $495 $2,500 $85 $345 $260 $350 $499 $125 $135 $500 $1,000 $119 $15,000 $1,500 $399 $1,199 $2,100 $1,800 $260 $1,100 $940 $399 $300 $110 $800 $385 $575 24.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 24.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 15.0 4.0 1.0 0.0 5.0 1.0 6.0 1.0 3.0 12.1.0 1.0 1.0 1 .0 15.0 10.0 5.0 20.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 $50,400 $6,000 $2,000 $3,900 $20,160 $0 $0 $0 $1,098 $495 $2,500 $255 $1,035 $520 $350 $7,485 $500 $0 $500 $0 $595 $15,000 $9,000 $399 $3,597 $25,200 $1,800 $260 $1,100 $14,100 $3,990 $1,500 $2,200 $800 $22,780 $385 $575 Mabelvale Middle School / Page 2 5.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 15.0 2.0 20 5.0 1.0 6.0 2.1.0 .0 .0 S.( 1.1 1.0 5.1 15.1 .0 0 10.0 5.0 15.i.O 1.0 0.0 $10,500 $3,000 $2,000 $3,900 $4,200 $1,198 $1,798 $4,598 $1,098 $0 $0 $340 $0 $520 $0 $7,485 $0 $270 $0 $2,000 $595 $15,000 $9,000 $2,398 $10,500 $1,800 $260 $5,500 $14,100 $3,990 $1,500 $1,650 $800 $0 $0 5.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 50 1.0 2.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 5.0 1.0 6.0 1.0 2.0 0.1 0.1 .0 .0 5.0 15.1.0 10.0 5.1.0 01..0 2.1.0 $10,500 $3,000 $2,000 $3,900 $4,200 $599 $1,798 $11,495 $1,098 $990 $2,500 $340 $690 $520 $350 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $595 $15,000 $9,000 $399 $2,398 $0 $5,500 $14,100 $3,990 $1,500 $0 $0 $0 Little Rock, Arkansas Classroom Blood Pressure PT Ta We PT Mats 08 A Analysis System Electronic CPR Mannequin Transit Chair Sktnfold Calipers Oven Incubators Human Torso Animal Cell Mitosis KH Reaction Timer Stretcher Skillmeter Printer Trauma Cases Repiralion Transducer BIpodal Electrode Assemby Lab Incubator Electrophoresis Call Electrophoresis Lab KH Ceentrlfuge DNAKRs Hot Plats SHreis Force Transducer Eyewash Fixture Microtome Human Ear Modal Human Eye Model Tissue Float Bath Slide Wanning Tabla Embedding Table Slide Cabinet Medical SuppHes Medical Software and Videos Medical Books and Subcripllons Envlmnmanttl Computed w/MonItofs Penonal FMntws Computer Furniture Pehn PtWs Plant TeWe Hydro Table Uninterrupted Power Source MIcroscpes River Tank Ecosystems Mobile Carts General Lab Equipment Incubator Environmental Supplies 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 159 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 $44 $2,500 $620 $2,250 $2,135 $445 $370 $850 $2,250 $795 $115 $206 $235 $160 $270 $145 $850 $189 $908 $1,790 $216 $346 $410 $79 $1,679 $280 $285 $360 $469 $165 $389 $5,000 $2,500 $3,000 $2,100 $325 $840 $399 $320 $465 $260 $679 $561 $200 $200 $350 $9,000 10.0 0.0 0.0 $440 $0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 20.0 4.0 20.0 10.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 15.0 5.0 5.0 20.0 0.0 1.0 $2,135 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 $2,500 $3,000 $42,000 $1,300 $16,800 $3,990 $960 $1,395 $260 $10,185 $2,605 $1,000 $4,000 $0 $9,000 Mabelvale Middle School / Page 3 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.(0 1.0 1.(0 5.0 2.0 5.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 1.0 1.5 $88 $5,000 $1,860 $4,500 $6,405 $445 $1,850 $850 $2,250 $795 $115 $206 $235 $180 $540 $290 $0 $189 $908 $0 $0 $0 $0 $79 $0 $260 $285 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 $2,500 $3,000 $10,500 $650 $4,200 $3,990 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000 $350 $13,500 30.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 $1,320 $0 $0 $370 $650 $0 $850 $0 $0 $1,790 $216 $346 $410 $79 $1,679 $0 .0 .0 5.0 2.0 5.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 $360 $469 $185 $389 $5,000 $2,500 $10,500 $650 $4,200 $7,980 $0 $0 $0 $1,358 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,000 Little Rock. Arkansas I Environmental VWeos/DVD Environmental Reference Books Environmental Periodicals Student Safety Set Environmental Data Logoer I Global Posttlonina Systwm |em Candle Ic-fam Lighting System Iptant Mobile [Environmental Chamber [comell Insect Cabinet [Neb I Rectangle Aquatic Set I Seine [chest Waders [stereo Microscopes [Brooder [Aquarium [pH Meter [Aquaculture System [Binoculars [Mlcroproiector [ Flaxcam [classroom Pond [Laminar Flow Unit I Planb for Aquarium [small Animals [Aquaculture Test KH [Hydroponics System [storage Cabinets [nigh Density Storage Cabinet [pish for Aquariums [water Purification System I KHma-grow system [ Nlma-grow Nxtoaoty Kit [Deep Soil Coring Tube I Field CoHoeBon Kit [Glassware [ Multi Media Screen [soil Salinity Tester 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 172 $4,000 $3,000 $3.000[ $ioo[ $450[ $572 $50 [ $78 840[ $2.850[ $667[ $129 $147 $260 $97 $739[ $350 $1,775 $510 $1,795 $151 [ $625[ $896[ $334[ $3.098[ $96 $42 $181 [ $144[ $1,300 $493 $175 $41 $1,355 $80 $152 $2,300 $530 $205 SUBTOTAL SUPPUES CONTRACTUAL Technotogy Maintenance 148 $26,000 SUBTOTAL CONTRACTUAL QIUEB 1.0 1.0 1.0 80.0 3.0l l 15.0| 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $4,000 $3,000 $3.000] $6,000 $2,2171 $3501 $1,7751 $510 $1,795 $2.265| $625 $0 w 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 1.0 $0 $ol 0.0 1.0 $332,787 $26,000 Mabelvale Middle School / Page 4 1 .0 $4,000 $3,000 $3,000 $100 $450 $572 $50 $78 $2,850 $2,850 $867 $387 $147 $260 $485 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,510 $0 $0 $0 $0 $420 $175 $0 $205 $25,000 $208,446 $26,000 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 10.0 0.0 3.01 lO.ol lO.ol 3.0| 3.o| 8.0l 1 ol 2.o| 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1-0 1.0 $4,000 $3,000 $3,000 w $5.385[ $1,510 $1.002[ $3.098[ $860[ $420[ $543 $432[ $10,400 $493[ $350| $205[ $2.710[ $160 $304 $2,300 $530 *0 $25,000 $196,766 $26,000 I Little Rock, Arkansas FWW Trip Admissions and Moab Staff Dwalomiient Irtardlselpllnaty Instniction ProjactBasadLsamlng Insbuctlonal Planning Thematle Teaching 4 Curriculum Sdenttflc Inquiry Cooperative Learning Medical Sclenca Information Science Environmental Science Currteulum Devetepment Information Sdence Environmental Science Medical Sciences Internal Signage External Signage 157 151 151 151 151 151 151 164 153 177 164 174 161 158 159 SUBTOTAL TOTAL DIRECT TOTAL MABELVALE MIDDLE SCHOOL $11,400 $14,675 $15,725 $5,382 $5,382 $5,382 $1,170 $5,796 $5,796 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 $10,000 $10,000 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1 1.0 1.0 1.0 $0 $5,382 $5,382 $1,170 $0 $0 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $10,000 $0 $84,334 $837,886 $837,986 Mabehzale Middle School / Page 5 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1 2.5 0.6 2.0 2.0 $0 $0 $5,382 $1,755 $5,796 $5,796 $12,000 $30,000 $9,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $20,000 $10,000 $129,404 $769,813 $769,813 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1 2.0 0.8 1.0 $5,382 $0 $5,382 $2,340 $5,796 $0 $12,000 $24,000 $9,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $94,626 $739,631 $739,631 Little Rock, Arkansas ni OVERDALE MIDDLE SCHOOL YEAR ONE ITEM paq^eference unit price number cost SUBTOTAL NUMBER I ITTLE ROCK ARKANSAS_________ YEAR TWO year THREE COST eiiarnTAL NUMBER COST SUBTOTAL SIIHTOTAL NUMBER COST PERSONNEL Cuntculum Coordinator [Engineering Lead Teacher Business & Finance Lead Teacher MultLMedla Lead Teacher 32 33 33 33 $52,000 $48,500 $48,500 $48,500 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 $53,560 $49,440 $49,440 $49,440 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 $55,167 $50,923 $50,923 $50,923 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 $58,477 $53,978 $53,978 $53,978 SUBTOTAL PERSONNEL FRINGE BENEFITS [AR ReBrwnent Rerwnent/Soc Sec. Wortcere Compensation Unemployment Health Insurance n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 12.00% 0.77% 0.87% 0.19% $2,620 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 $24,226 $1,544 $1,756 $386 $10,480 $201,880 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 $24,952 $1,591 $1,809 $397 $10,480 $207,936 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 $26,449 $1,686 $1,918 $421 $10,480 $220,412 SUBTOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS travel Site Visits to Magnet Schools 1 MSAP Annual Meeting MSA Annual Conference IB ConfereiKe Fall IB Conference Spring I National Academy Conference Project Lead the Way Conference SUBTOTAL TRAVEL EQUIPMENT International Baccalaureate MYP Mobile Vflreless Language Lab Eng/rreering $38,392 $39,229 $40,954 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 226 $776 $896 $1,200 $1,200 $1400 $1,600 $1,172 $22,000 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4. kO 3.1 .0 $3,104 $3,580 $4,800 $7,200 $7,200 $6,000 $3,516 $36,400 Cloverdale / Page 1 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.1 .0 4.0 3.0 1.1 .0 $3,104 $3,580 $4,800 $7,200 $7,200 $6,000 $3,516 $36,400 $22,000 0.0 4.0 4.1 6.( .0 .0 6.0 4.0 3.0 $0 $3,580 $4,800 $7,200 $7,200 $6,000 $3,516 $32,296Little Rock, Arkansas SMART Board Robotic Automation Module Multi Media Pro|ector Engineering Enterprise Center MuWMed/a Multi Media Prelector I Video Camera Lighting Equipment I SMART Board I Cinema Screen Monitor I Sound Board Mixer I Professional Studio Camera Electronic Madia Enterprises Center I Economics I Economic Enterprise Emporium I SMART Board I Voting Machine I Multimedia Projector 263 263 263 263 241 241 241 241 241 241 241 229 229 229 229 SUBTOTAL EQUIPMENT SUPPUES Muta Media I Computer w/ monitor Color Laser Printer Laser Printer Student Computer Furniture Digital Cameras I Computer Server I CD Player iHarxilCam I Set Props I Lectern I Conference Table I Flat Monitor I Choral Risers I Staddng Chairs Student Text and Reference Books Super VMS VCR w/Large Monitor I PC Cameras 241 241 241 241 241 241 241 241 241 241 241 241 241 241 241 241 241 $1,499 $6,996 $6,300 $70,000 $6,300 $17,900 $14,999 $7,999 $17,999 $10,000 $70,000 $60,000 $14,999 $6,000 $6,300 $2,100 $2,050 $1,125 $940 $599 $1,800 $800 $800 $500 $119 $746 $849 $439 $40 $5,000 $834 $119 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 1.0 2.0 10.0 0.0 1.0 1.( 0.1 .0 .0 00 0.1.0 1.<.0 5.1.0 $0 $0 $35,000 $5,300 $17,900 $14,999 $0 $0 $0 $35,000 $60,000 $0 $0 $21,000 $2,050 $2,250 $9,400 $0 $1,600 $800 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 $595 $168,199 Cloverdale / Page 2 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 2.0 10.1.0 3.( 0.1 0.1 .0 .0 .0 2.0 0.1.0 3.1.0 0.1.0 0.0 0.1.0 0.0 1.(.0 0.0 3.1.0 $1,499 $5,995 $5,300 $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $7,999 $0 $0 $35,000 $9,600 $0 $0 $0 $122,393 $0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 $5,300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $17,999 $10,000 $0 $14,999 $6,000 $10,600 $64,8S8 $21,000 $0 $2,250 $9,400 $1,797 $0 $0 $1,600 $0 $357 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 $0 $357 10.0 1.0 2.0 10< 0.1 .0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 1.( .0 4.kO 4.0 25.1.0 1.(.0
.o 1.0 2. 10. $21,000 $2,050 $2,250 $9,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000 $0 $746 $3,396 $1,756 $1,000 $5,000 $1,668 $1,190 Little Rock, Arkansas KCAT Set Design Telepfompter CD Rewrite Drive Computer Software Computer Supplies Prolectton Screen Scanners Laptop Computers Engineering Computer wl rrwnltor Architectural Printer Laser Printer FHe Server Computer Fumiturs Fax Machine Student Drafting Tools Air Track System Pulley Demonstration Set Space Shuttle Kit Designer's Kit Launch System Altitude Tracker Transroc II rocket locator Waterbottle Rocket Launcher Car Tech Bridge Kit 3-D HOME KIT Giant Stacking Trays -10 drawer Fin alignment Guides Magnetism Kit Van de Graaf Generator WImshurst Machine Lightning Accelerator Superconductor Kit Bobbitt Power supply Oscilloscope RF Signal Generator Multimeter Electronic Lab Kit Helix Coll Pro)ectual 241 241 241 241 241 241 241 241 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 $2,000 $1,850 $345 $25,000 $5,000 $495 $399 $1,199 $2,100 $2,950 $1,125 $1,600 $440 $489 $79 $1,395 $259 $39 $45 $38 $22 $41 $2,400 $89 $69 $86 $698 $19 $83 $449 $115 $28 $85 $395 $765 $259 $92 $105 $90 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 5.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 1.0 25.0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $10,000 $495 $1,596 $2,398 $10,500 $2,950 $0 $0 $2,200 $489 $1,975 Cloverdale I Page 3 1.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 4.0 5.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 1.0 1.0 $2,000 $1,850 $1,035 $25,000 $5,000 $0 $399 $4,796 $10,500 $2,950 $1,125 $1,800 $2,200 $0 $0 $1,395 $259 1.0 6.0 6.0 3.0 4.0 15.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 5.0 30.0 30.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 1.0 30.0 30.0 10.0 3.0 30.0 3.1 1.1 .0 .0 1.0 10.I.0 2.0 5.1.0 2..(0 2.1 10.1 .0 .0 10.1.0 2.0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $30,000 $2,970 $1,197 $4,796 $31,500 $2,950 $2,250 $0 $2,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,170 $1,350 $380 $220 $410 $2,400 $2,670 $2,070 $860 $2,694 $570 $249 $449 $115 $280 $170 $1,975 $1,530 $518 $920 $1,050 $180 Little Rock. Arkansas Magnetic Field Projectual Faraday's Pro)ectual Breadboarding Worirstatlon Laser Optica Set Spectroscope lANgular Momentum Apparatus I Organizer Cart iRobotIxMotorPak I Booster Pak I Remote Speeders I Knex Racing Energy Kit Knex Rollefcoaster KK-Knex Simple Machines Kit I Robotic Arm I Automotive Design Kits I Aerospace Module I Alternate Energy Module I Solar Energy Module I Uninterrupted Power Source I Helium Neon Laser I Electrostatic Kit I Drafting Tables I PLTW Engineering Kit 1 I PLTW Engineering Kit 2 I PLTW Engineering Kit 3 I PLTW Engineering KR 4 Engineering Module |r a D Module I Electronics Module I Uninterrupted Power Source I Air Compressor I Air Brush Kits I Laser Component Module Fiber Optics Module I Structural Engineering Module I Ballistic Cars iTrlcarts I Rocket Carl I Ballistic Pendulum Apparatus I Engineering Materials 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 253 $70 $185 $415 $250 $3151 $2251 $11 ol $59 $169 $691 $130 $259 $259 $399 $3,195 $1,195 $1,795 $2,295 $260 $635 $12ol $75o| $4,9881 $4,575 $4,65o| $5,099! $1,195 $1,195 $1,149 $260 $352 $149 $675| $1,150 $2,98sl $66 $91 $70 $69 $15,0001 1.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 $520 2.0 $5,250 $4,988 $0 $1,195 $0 $o| $520 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,0001 Cloverdale / Page 4 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 1 .0 1.<.0 1 1 .0 .0 10.0 10.0 10.1 3.1 .0 0 1 .0 10.0 2.0 15.0 15.0 2.0 $225 $1,100 $590 $1,690 $690 $1,300 $2,590 $2,590 $399 $0 $0 $0 $0 $520 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,575 $0 $0 $0 $520 $352 $149 $675 $1,150 $2,985 $660 $910 $700 $207 $15,000 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.1.0 1.0 0.0 O.( .0 0. 2. 0. (.0 !.O 1.0 0.1.0 0.1.0 o.< 0.1 .0 .0 O..l0 0.0 0.1.0 0.(.0 1.0 $700 $370 $6,225 $3,750 $630 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,995 $0 $5,975 $8,975 $11,475 $520 $635 $120 $0 $0 $4,650 $5,099 $0 $0 $0 $520 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 Little Rock, Arkansas Engineerlno Software Engineering Videos, DVD, Books 253 253 $15,000 $5,000 1.0 1.0 $15,000 $5,000 1.0 1.0 $15,000 $5,000 1.0 1.0 $15,000 $5,000 Economics Computers w/MonItors Color Laser Printers Laser Printers Computer Furniture Palm Pitots Flatbed Scanners Conference Table Filing Cabinets Dyno Label Writer Electronic Labeler Paper Shredder Zoning Maps Locking Display Case Prototype Displays Paper Trimmers Cash Registers Portable Pro|ectton Screen Laptop Computers Magazine Racks Easels Interactive Globe Title Stamps Economics VWeos/DVD Economies Text & Reference Books Economics Periodicals Computer Software S licenses Netwoek Server Printing Calculator Versa Check Digital Camera VCR/DVD Player 229 229 229 229 229 229 229 229 229 229 229 229 229 229 229 229 229 229 229 229 229 229 229 229 229 229 229 229 229 229 229 $2,100 $2,200 $1,100 $940 $399 $300 $1,500 $75 $200 $80 $199 $336 $2,000 $1,500 $248 $1,125 $495 $1,800 $450 $129 $99 $25 $4,000 $6,000 $3,000 $8,000 $1,800 $30 $5,000 $599 $400 5.0 1.0 2.0 5.0 10.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 1.1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 1 .0 0.0 1 .0 $10,500 $2,200 $2,200 $4,700 $3,990 $0 $1,500 $150 $200 $80 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $645 $196 $75 $4,000 $6,000 $3,000 $8,000 $1,800 $120 $5,000 $0 $400 10.0 0.0 2.0 10.0 5.0 1.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 .0 .0 0.0 2.0 2.1.0 0. 1.0 $21,000 $0 $2,200 $9,400 $1,995 $300 $0 $150 $0 $0 $199 $1,008 $2,000 $3,000 $744 $2,250 $495 $5,400 $1,350 $0 $0 $0 $4,000 $6,000 $3,000 $6,000 $0 $0 $10,000 $1,198 $0 10.0 1.0 1.0 10.0 20.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.1.0 1.0 0.0 10.1.0 $21,000 $2,200 $1,100 $9,400 $7,980 $600 $0 $150 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000 $6,000 $3,000 $8,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,990 $0 SUBTOTAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTUAL Technology Maintenance 263 $26,000 $202,729 1.1.0 $25,000 $246,336 1.0 $25,000 $339,608 Cloverdale / Page 5 Little Rock, Arkansas SUBTOTAL CONTRACTUAL OTHER Field Trip Admissions and Meals Staff Development Project Lead the Way Project Based Learning Instructional Planning Thematic Teaching & Curriculum Scientific Inquiry Multiple Intelligences Cooperative Learning Engineering Multt-Medla Economics Curriculum Development Englrreering Multi-Media Economics Irrtematlonal Baccalaureate Fees Internal Signage External Signage 256 256 256 235 231 234 235 234 258 246 225 254 243 225 225 229 229 SUBTOTAL TOTAL DIRECT TOTAL CLOVERDALE MIDDLE SCHOO . $26,000 $26,000 $26,000 $10,000 $12,000 $15,000 $2,100 $5,382 $5,382 $1,170 $5,796 $6,210 $5,796 $12,000 $12,000 $10,000 $15,000 $10,000 $10,000 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1.0 1.0 $2,100 $5,382 $5,382 $1,170 $0 $0 $5,796 $12,000 $12,000 $10,000 $12,000 $12,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $117330 $789/430 $789/430 Cloverdale I Page 6 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 $2,100 $0 $5,382 $1,170 $5,796 $6,210 $5,796 $12,000 $12,000 $10,000 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 $10,000 $10,000 $140,464 $816,748 $815,748 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 $2,100 $0 $5,382 $1,170 $5,796 $0 $0 $12,000 $12,000 $10,000 $12,000 $12,000 $12,000 $0 $0 $99/448 $822,617 $822,617 UtMe Rock, Arkansas IITTLE ROCK ARKANSAS MAGNET OFFICE ITEM PAGE UNIT YEAR ONE COST ------ 7^ SUBTOTALS YEAR TWO COST SUBTOTALS * year THREE COST SUBTOTALS PERSONNEL Project Director Marketing / Recruiter Secretary 32,79 33,91 133,34,91 $65,000 $35,000 $23,000 1- 1.0 $65,0001 $39,70C $23,000 1.0 $66,950 $36,0501 $23,690 1.0 1.0 1.0 $68,959 $37,1321 $24,400 SUBTOTAL PERSONNEL 3.0 $127,700 3.0 $126,690 3.0 $130,491 fringe benefits AR Retirement Retirement/Soc Sec. Workers Compensation Unemptoyment Health Insurance 32,79,91 32,79,91 32,79,91 32,79,91 32,79,91 12.00% 0.77% 0.87% 0.19% $2,6201 3.0 3.0l $15,324.0 $976.9 $1,111.0 $244.0 $7,860.0 3.0 3.0 $15,202.8 $969.2 $1,102.2 $242.11 $7,860.0 3.0 3.0 $15,658.9 $998.3 $1,135.3 $2491 $7,860 SUBTOTAL BENEFITS $25,516 $25,376 $25,902 SUPPUES Pentium IV Desktop Computer Powertxjok Copying & Duplicating Fax Digital Camera I Phono Sets I Typewriter Scanner I Printer I Office Supplies I Small Conference Table I Magnet Promotional Items I Grand Opening Celebrations iBook Cases I Color Laser Printer I Computer Software iFileCabinels I Computer Supplies 1 Office Fumitute 32,79,91 32,79,91 32,79,91 32,79,91 32,79,91 32,79,91 32,79,91 32,79,91 132,79,91 132,79,91 132,79,91 32,79,91 32,79,91 132,79,91 32,79,91 32,79,91 132,79,91 32,79,91 32, T9.91 $1,500 $2,500 $6,000 $250 $900 $300 $100 $250 $325 $3,000 $250 $4,000 $8.0001 $96 $2,050 $2,000 $180 $1,500 $900 3.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 $4,5001 $0 $6,0001 $250 $900 $900 $100 $250 $325 $3,0001 $250 $4,000 $0 $294 $2,050 $2,000 $540 $1,500 $2,700! 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $0 $2,5001 $6,0001 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000 $0 $4,000 $0 $98 $2,050 $2,000 $0 $1,500 $0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 .0 0.0 1 .0 0.0 1 .0 0.0 1 .0 0.0 1 .0 0.0 $0 $0 $6,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000 $0 $4,000 $0 $98 $0 $2,000 $0 $1,500 $0 Cloverdale / Page 1 Little Rock, Arkansas SUBTOTALSUPPUES IBAYEL Out of District In-District 32,79 32,33,79,91 $7,200 $2,500 $29,559 $21,148 $16,598 SUBTOTAL TRAVEL CONTRACTUAL Evaluation Television Commercials Printing Radio Commercials Production Services Art 5i Layout 280 75 75 75 75 91 $37,500 $20,000 $14,000 $5,000 $16,000 $4,000 $9,700 SUBTOTAL CONTRACTUAL OTHER Memberships Women in Math & Science Camp Magnet Fair Costs SUBTOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $96,500 72 76 $750 $4,000 $2,500 $7,250 $296,225 Cloverdale / Page 2 $7,200 $2,500 $37,500 $15,000 $14,000 $4,000 $10,000 $2,000 $750 $4,000 $2,500 $9,700 $82,500 $7,250 $272,684 $7,200 $2,500 $37,500 $15,000 $14,000 $4,000 $10,000 $2,000 $750 $4,000 $2,500 $9,700 $82,500 $7,250 $272341 Ind irect Cost PropositiFrom: INDIRECT COST PROPOSAL FOR USE IN 1998-1999 (Computed From 1996-97 Financial Information) UMtl. School District Name 6001000 LEA Number MAY 1 2 1999 AMfstant Directors Office Internal Administration X2LASK1 County May 10. 1999 Date Submitted INDIRECT COST RATE FOR 1998-1999 Non-Restricted Programs Rate Restricted Programs Rate INDIRECT COST CERTIFICATION 0.1868 0.0708 1 certify as the responsible official of LITTLE ROCK (School District) that this Indirect Cost Proposd has been prepared in accordance with instructions issued by the Arkansas Department oi Education and is correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Those costs treated as indirect costs have not been claimed as direct cost, and similar types of costs have been accorded consistent treatment All expenditures entered in this proposal have been made and records supporting them have been maintained and Signature: 1 are available foraudit trintendent it Date: May 10, 1999 Superintel Approved By: Assistant Director, Internal Administration Date: Required by: CFR Part 80.40 Submitted To: Arkansas Department of Education Internal Administration #4 State Capitol Mall - Room 103-B Little Rock, AR 72201-1071 IDC-1 December 17, 2000 Little Rock School District ABSTRACT The mission of the Little Rock School District (LSRD) is to equip all students with the skills and knowledge to realize their aspirations, think critically and and face the future as productive. independently, learn continuously contributing citizens. This mission is accomplished through open access to a diverse, innovative and environment with a staff dedicated to challenging curriculum in a secure excellence and empowered with the trust and support of the community. The LRSD is located in Little Rock, Arkansas, the states capital. The LRSD is the largest public school district in Arkansas, with a K through 12 enrollment of 25,560 students for the 2000-2001 school year. Of the total student enrollment. 68% are African-American, 27% are white, and 5% are Hispanic, Asian, or other. The student enrollment is 72% minority. The district has two high schools and two middle schools located in the southwest section of the city that have a degree of minority isolation well beyond the other schools in the district. J. A. Fair High and McClellan High are the most minority isolated high schools in the district. Mabelvale Middle and Cloverdale Middle are the most minority isolated middle schools in the district. The district proposes McClellan, J. A. Fair, Cloverdale, and Mabelvale into magnet schools to convert McClellan, J. A. Fair, cioveraaie, ana iviaucivcuc to reduce and eliminate minority group isolation, to hold the non-minority students currently attending the schools, to attract neighborhood children back from private schools, and to attract student from outside the neighborhood from the private, Pulaski County and surrounding adjacent counties. These four Little Rock magnet schools will develop and implement curriculum national, state, and local systemic reforms aligned with content standards and student performance standards. The that promotes challenging state goals of these magnet schools include developing innovative educational methods . 1 . . J _x ] J. intoracfc frlfl't and practices that meet identified student needs and interests and that strengthen students knowledge of academic subjects and skills needed for O - .1_____-ni morfriAf successful careers in themes: the future. The schools will have the following magnet Abstract - iDecember 17, 2000 Little Rock School District Proposed Magnet Schools J. A. Fair High School McClellan High School Mabelvale Middle School Cloverdale Middle School Theme New or Revised Information Sciences and Systems Engineering Environmental Science Medical Studies Business and Finance Multimedia and Graphic Design Engineering International Baccalaureate Information and Communication Technology Environmental Science Medical Investigations Economics Multimedia Engineering International Baccalaureate Abstract -11 New Revised New New New MSAP INDICATORS REFERENCE SHEETSDecember 18, 2000 Objectiyel Little Rock School District federally fimded magnet, incidence and/of the deVee of minority student isolation m targeted Sources of Data and Next Update Indicator (of success) Application Page Annual Project Report Refs. Year 1 Page Refs. Year 2 Page Refs. Year 3 Page Refs. 1-1. Minority enrollment in targeted schools. Targeted schools with objectives of eliminating or preventing minority group Isolation keep 1 their minority enrollments below 50 percent. Targeted schools with the objective of reducing minority group Isolation I reduce their minority enrollment percentages. Provide overall district enrollment at time of application, by minority status, for the grade levels to be Included In magnet schools. List each magnet school and its
a) enrollment by minority status (both number and percentages of students), by grade, at time of application. 7 b) projected enrollment by minority status (both number and percentages of students), for each year of the proposed project, and 8-9 6,9 Report overall district enrollment by minority status, for the grade levels included in the magnet schools. For each magnet school: a) provide percentages of students) and by grade. b) provide current projections of enrollment by minority status, without the magnet If appropriate), and c) objective (to eliminate, reduce, or eliminate minority isolation). If the objective Is to prevent minority group Isolation, provide projected enrollment by minority I status, with and without magnet (i.e., operational definition of objective), with both number and I percentages of students. 13- 14 c) report the success or progress in meeting ------- the objective. Performance Indicators - UiDecember 18. 2000 Little Rock School District Objective 1 Federally funded magnet programs eliminate, reduce, or preyent .^e,,.^^^^ incidence and/or the degree of minority student isolation in targeted
.. Sources of Data and Next Update Indicator (of success) Application Page Refs. Annual Project Report Year 1 Page Refs. Year 2 Page Refs. Year 3 Page Refs. 1-3. Minority/ Other distribution. Magnet curricular activities generally reflect the same minority/Other distribution as the magnet school (or PWS). Indicate curricular areas (e.g., classes, grades, subjects) in which you plan to promote broad participation and Interaction among different groups of students In the magnet school (or PWS). 21 Provide data on student participation, by minority status, in areas Intended to promote broad participation and Interaction, for selected grades or subjects. Describe what these data suggest tn terms of changes to your project. Performance Indicators - vl December 18, 2000 Little Rock School District Objective 2 Federally funded magnet programs promote national, state, and local systermc reforms and are aligned with challenging State content standards and student Sources of Data and Next Update Indicator (of success) Application Page Refs. Annual Project Report Year 1 Page Refs. Year 2 Page Refs. Year 3 Page Refs. 2-1. National, state, and local reforms. Magnet programs play an active role In Implementing national, state, and local reforms. Describe systemic reforms being implemented in your district, the goals of these reforms, and the contributions your magnet program will make to these efforts. 2-2. State content and performance standards. Project designs explicitly provide evidence of the I use of challenging State content standards and student performance standards. These are reflected in the program curriculum and in planned student assessments aligned to the curriculum. Indicate whether your state has a set of challenging content standards and student performance standards In the core subjects (e.g., reading, writing, math, science). If I NO, Indicate whether such standards are being developed and in what subjects, and briefly 1 describe the standards you are using in lieu of State standards. Indicate whether your state, district, or school has developed an assessment to measure performance against those standards. If YES, Indicate the subjects and whether you plan to use I the assessment. If NO, describe the assessment you Intend to use and why. 21 21 21 Provide a narrative of _____ _____ up to three pages which describes how your magnet program has supported and extended systemic reforms In you district. Identify any exceptions or changes to application information. Submit the assessment data as part of Objective 4. Performance Indicators - vU December 18, 2000 Little Rock School District Objective 3 feature innovative educational methods Federally funded magnet programs and practices that meet identified student needs and mterests. Sources of Data and Next Update Indicator (of success) Application Page Refs. Annual Project Report Year 1 Page Refs. Year 2 Page Refs. Year 3 Page Refs. 3-1 Innovative themes. Magnet programs Incorporate Innovative themes I and elements that meet identified student needs and Interest. Describe the themes and elements In the magnet program that will meet Identified student needs and interests, and provide a rationale for selecting these themes and elements. 106 For each magnet school, provide a narrative of up to two pages which describes how the magnet program has I Implemented these themes and elements and how they are meeting Identified student needs and interests. 3-2. Innovative educational methods and practices. Magnet programs incorporate Innovative educational methods and I practices that promote student achievement. Identify the elements in the magnet program that will promote student achievement, and provide a rationale for selecting these elements. 59-68 For each magnet school, provide a I narrative of up to three I pages which describes activities, methods, and practices, each of which meets all of these criteria: a) is related to the magnet theme, b) was not produced In the school prior to the magnet I program c) is used by at least two teachers in the school, and d) Impacts the achievement of 20 of more students. Performance Indicators - vlUDecember 18, 2000 Little Rock School District Objective 4 Federally funded magnet programs strengthen students knowledge of academic subjects and skills needed for successful careers in the future. Sources of Data and Next Update Indicator (of success) Application Page Refs. Annuzd Project Report Year 1 Page Refs. Year 2 Page Refs. Year 3 Page Refs. 4-1. Improved student achievement. Magnet students show achievement gains In core subjects, as well as In applied learning skills, which meet or exceed the gains I for students in the district as a whole. (Applied learning skills include higher order thinking skills, individual problem-solving ability, 1 communication skills, computer skills, and ability to contribute to group projects). 4-2. Vocational skills. (Optional \for federally /unded magnet school or PWSs that do not /eature development of specialized skills) Magnet students demonstrate knowledge and proficiency In vocational skills related to the magnet theme. Describe how Increases In academic knowledge and applied learning skills will be assessed, overall and by minority status. Identify criteria for defining magnet students measures to be examined, and relevant comparison or reference groups, where appropriate. Describe the specific skills to be developed and how proficiency In these skills will be assessed, overall and by grade and minority status. Identify the standard for performance and the measure to be used against that standard. 26 26 26 Document the results from these assessments, overall and by school, grade, and minority status. Include both the number and percentage of students who meet the standard for performance. Describe what these data suggest In terms of changes to your project. 26 Document the results from these assessments, overall and by school, grade, and minority status. Include both the number and percentage of students who meet the standard for performance. Describe what these data suggest In terms of changes to your project. Performeince Indicators - txINTRODUCTION BACKGROUND HISTORY OF DESEGREGATION AND MAGNET SCHOOLS NEEDS ASSESSMENT December 15, 2000 Little Rock School District INTRODUCTION Little Rock is the geographical, political, and financial center of Arkansas. It is at the meeting point of the states major regions, the northwestern hills and the eastern Delta. a In 1722 Benard de la Harpe is said to have come up the Arkansas River in canoe. rock since a Legend has it that as he came up river he saw the first outcropping of he left the Mississippi and named it the little rock. The larger cliffs little further up stream, he named Big Rock. Today there is still a Big Rock Township in North Little Rock. In 1819 when the Arkansas Territory was formed, the point of rocks were selected as the territorial capital. Little Rock was the ideal site for a capital. It is located where the plains meet the hills, the natural ford of the river, and on the Southwest Trail to Louisiana and Texas. Today, Little Rock is on the move. The River Market Entertainment District has new businesses opening every month, sj al Developments along the river front on both sides of the river have made the river front parks a favorite for all types of festivals, concerts and family outings. Modem Little Rock has a population of 182,274 people. Its population is 64.6% white, 33.9% African-American, and less than 1% each for Native Americans, Asians, and people of Hispanic heritage. A large part of the citys downtovm is a part ofthe Pulaski County Enterprise Zone. The state capital, it is a city that has a relaxed and open feel - a far cry from the dramaUc events of 1957. part Introduction - 1December 15, 2000 Little Rock School District HISTORY OF DESEGREGATION In 1957, Little Rock unexpectedly became the battleground in the first major conflict between state and federal government authority over desegregation. At the time, the city was generally viewed as progressive by Southern standards. All parks, libraries and buses were integrated, a relatively high thirty percent of African-Americans were registered to vote and there were African-American police officers. However, when the Little Rock School Board announced its decision to phase in desegregated schools gradually, James Johnson, a candidate for governor, adopted a position against racially integrated schools. Johnsons rhetoric began to win him support, so the incumbent governor, Orval Faubus, who had previously shown no interest in the issue, jumped on the bandwagon. The first nine African-American students were due to enter Central High School that September. The day before school opened, Faubus reversed his decision to let the African-American students enroll in the interest of safety. Even though he was overruled by the federal court, Faubus ordered state troopers to keep the African-American students from entering the school. On the first day of school, the nine African-American students faced soldiers with bayonets that forced them away from the front entrance and into a seething crowd. Three weeks later. President Eisenhower brought in the 101 Airborne Division, and amfdst violent demonstrations the nine students were at last able to enter Central High School. In 1958, Central High School graduated its first African-American student. Following this historic graduation, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld an order to desegregate the citys schools. Governor Faubus immediately closed all four Little Rock high schools. The schools remained closed for two years. In 1959 the federeil courts declared the school closing unconstitutional and the high schools were reopened for the 1959-60 school year. Although the Little Rock School District faced a hostile governor and state administration and an unfriendly legislature, significant desegregation took place in the 60s. By the end of the decade Central High School had 1542 white students and 512 African- American students. In 1971 the Court of Appeals approved a plan for the desegregation of grades 6 through 12 in the Little Rock School District (LRSD). The School Board plan for the desegregation of the elementary grades was approved, with some modification, in 1972. Introduction - 2December 15, 2000 Little Rock School District By 1982 the LRSD was faced with massive white flight and had become 70% African-American. The district filed a suit to consolidate the three Pulaski County school districts into oned--i-s-t--r-i-c-t that would be 61% white. This was resisted by the other two districts in the county. In 1985 the Court rejected consolidation as too intrusive. The Court, however, extended the boundaries of the Little Rock School District to make them coterminous with the boundaries of the City of Little Rock. In expanding the bboouunnddaarriieess ooff tthhee LLRRSSDD tthnee cCoouurrtt aaududeeud nneeww schools and students. The four schools in the southwestern region of the city that are featured in this application were District to the LRSD. transferred from the Pulaski County School The most recent court action occurred in 1998 when the Court revised LRSD s Desegregation emd Education Plan. Building on its effort to remedy past discrimination by LRSD against African-American students, the Court s revision included seven designated magnet programs, with LRSD reserving the right to modify or discontinue designated magnet programs and to establish new magne programs. THE SOUTHWEST SCHOOLS The four schools that were transferred to the LRSD in 1985 from Pulaski County have changed a great deail since their realignment. The following chart shows the changes in the four schools: J. A. Fair High School McClellan High School Mabelvale Middle School Cloverdale Middle School These changes have occurred while the SW neighborhood has remained predominately white. In fact almost Introduction - 3 December 17, 2000 Little Rock School District one-third of the students in the attendance area are white. These students have opted for private schools, county schools, and home schooling. In fact 1,402 students who live in the neighborhood are not attending the neighborhood schools. Almost five hundred of these are White students. The MSAP application seeks to address this by converting the schools into magnet schools that will draw students from the SW neighborhood as well as from other areas of the county. There are enough White students living in the neighborhood and not attending the schools to achieve project goals. MAGNET SCHOOLS IN LITTLE ROCK The Little Rock School District is located in Little Rock, an urban city of 182,000 in the center of Arkansas, Ijinif Hock Mnal nUnd Sclitml .tfn/t ninl and covers approximately 100 square miles. The District is comprised of approximately 25,560 students and more than 3,500 employees on 50 campuses
35 neighborhood elementary schools, eight middle schools, five high Tai schools, one career and technology high school and one alternative school for grades 6-12. Additionally, 'l there are 11 administrative sites. The ethnic breakdown of the District is 68% African-American, 27% Caucasian and \ ale a 8 rrZ: r ig- LEGEND SenooK Sctvxx* I 0 CiMTwnWrr Scnem ' 5 % 8 2 h t 0 a T Sie ' t I i tfy Carwt Teen Cemr | Hispanic/Asian/Native American. The Little Rock School District offers several school choices for parents including Eirea schools, magnet schools/programs, incentive schools, interdistrict transfers and early childhood educaUon programs. Alternative programs are available for students in grades 4-12. In addition to the programs that are featured in this application, the Little Rock School District offers a full range of magnet programs to students in the city, the Introduction - 4December 15, 2000 Little Rock School District county, and in North LitUe Rock. Students may choose magnet schools operated by any ofthe three school districts as long as the transfer advances desegregabon goals. The following chart gives the magnet offerings that currently exist. The schools are color coded according to the operating district. SCHOOL THEME GRADES OPERATED BY Booker Arts K- 5 Little Rock School District Carver Basic Skllls/Math-Sclence K- 5 Little Rock School District Clinton Speech and Technology K-6 Pulaski County School District Crystal Hill Communications K-6 North Little Rock School District Gibbs International Studles/Foreign Language ____________ K- 5 Little Rock School District King High Intensity Learning Pre K - 5 Little Rock School District Rockefeller Early Childhood Pre K Little Rock School District Washington Basic Skllls/Math-Sclence Pre K-5 Little Rock School District Williams Basic Skills K-5 Little Rock School District Central Dunbar Henderson Mann McClellan Parkview International Studies International Studies Health Science Arts md Science Buslness/Communlcations Arts and Sciences 9-12 6-8 6-8 6-8 9-12 9-12 Little Rock School District Little Rock School District Little Rock School District Little Rock School District Little Rock School District Little Rock School District Introduction - 5 December 15, 2000 Little Rock School District NEEDS ASSESSMENT The District has therefore identified four priority needs which will be addressed by this project. NEED I. There is a need to reduce minority group isolation in four minority isolated schools in the Southwest section of Little Rock. The Southwest schools are in an area of the city which is composed of neighborhoods that have representation of both African-American and White communities. However, the enrollment of the schools is becoming increasingly minority as the White parents opt for private schools and county schools. The district proposes to make the four schools into magnet schools to hoW the other students currently attending the schools, attract neighborhood children back from private schools, and attract students from outside the neighborhood from private and county schools. The district enrollments at the grades to be included in the magnet project are displayed in the chart below. As mandated by LRSDs Court Order, enrollment is reported as African-American and Other. DISTRICT ENROLLMENT BY GRADE LEVEL GRADE LEVEL # African- American Students % African- American Students # Other Students % Other Students TOTAL 10 11 12 1,380 1,267 1,166 1149 1,261 1,078 1,003 69% 70% 67% 66% 69% 66% 64% 626 542 571 589 570 550 557 31% 30% 33% 34% 31% 34% 36% 2,006 1,818 1737 1,738 1,831 1,628 1,560 6 7 8 9 The proposed schools and their objectives are displayed in the following chart. Needs Assessment - 6December 15, 2000 Little Rock School District PROPOSED MAGNET SCHOOLS / OBJECTIV^ Proposed Magnet Schools Objective Whole School or PWS J. A. Fair High School Reduce African-American Student Isolation Whole School McClellan High School Reduce African-American Student Isolation Whole School Mabelvale Middle School Reduce African-American Student Isolation Whole School Cloverdale Middle School Reduce African-American Student Isolation Whole School The chart below gives the baseline enrollment, as of September 30, 2000, for each proposed magnet school. This represents the African-American enrollment at the time of application by grade. BASELINE ENROLLMENT SCHOOL! GRADE LEVEL J. A. Fair High 10 11 12 TOTAL # African- American Students % African- American Students # Other Students % Other Students TOTAL 217 172 177 152 718 79% 80% 79% 82% 80% 59 43 47 33 182 21% 20% 21% 18% 20% 276 215 224 185 900 9 McClellan High 10 11 12 TOTAL 338 272 251 180 1,041 92% 92% 89% 88% 91% 28 24 31 25 108 8% 8% 11% 12% 9% 366 296 282 205 1,149 9 Needs Assessment - 7 December 17, 2000 Little Rock School District SCHOOL / GRADE LEVEL Mabelvale Middle TOTAL Cloverdale Middle TOTAL # African- American Students % African- American Students # Other Students % Other Students TOTAL 162 131 114 407 82% 76% 78% 79% 36 42 32 110 18% 24% 22% 21% 261 206 114 653 198 173 146 517 87% 87% 78% 86% 39 32 32 107 13% 13% 22% 14% 300 238 146 760 6 7 8 6 7 8 The next table presents the projected enrollments for each of the proposed magnet schools for each year of the three-year MSAP project. The table indic^es the number and percentage of African-American and Other students. The proiections reflect the changes in enrollment that will result from the implementation of the MSAP project. It does not take into account demographic and environmental forces that do not relate to magnet school implementation. PROJECTED ENROLLMENT SCHOOL/ YEAR # African- American Students % African- American Students # Other Students % Other Students TOTAL Year 1 October 1, 2001 J. A. Fair High McClellan High Mabelvale Middle Cloverdale Middle 718 1,041 407 653 78% 89% 77% 84% 200 130 120 122 22% 11% 23% 16% 918 1,171 527 775 Needs Assessment - 8 December 17, 2000 Little Rock School District SCHOOL/ TEAR # A&lcan- American Students % African- American Students Other Students % Other Students TOTAL s Year 2 October 1, 2002 J. A. Fair High McClellan High Mabelvale Middle Cloverdale Middle 718 1,041 407 653 75% 86% 74% 81% 233 170 145 149 25% 14% 26% 19% 951 1,211 552 802 Year 3 Oct. 1, 2003 J. A. Fair High McClellan High Mabelvale Middle Cloverdale Middle 718 1,041 407 653 70% 81% 69% 76% 310 250 180 205 30% 19% 31% 24% 1028 1,291 587 858 OBJECTIVE 1.1 By June 30, 2004, as a result of the implementation of magnet schools at the J. A. Fair and McClellan high schools and Mabelvale and Cloverdale middle schools, African-American isolation at these schools will have been reduced by 10% as evidenced by examination of official district records by an independent, outside evaluator in the Spring of 2004. The MSAP legislation is concerned about the effect that the magnet schools have QU the feeder schools. MSAP defines feeder schools as schools that the students attending the magnet school would normally attend. These are the schools from where the magnet schools draw their students. In addition to the Little Rock School District and the other two districts included in the Court Order, the district intends to attract students from private schools, home schooling, and the three Saline County school districts, Benton, Bryant, and Bauxite, that are adjacent to the southwest magnet schools. The following map shows the location of these school districts and the proximity to the target schools. Needs Assessment - 9Saline County is primarily a bedroom community of Little Rock. Most of the people in the county drive to Little Rock to work. This would facilitate enrollment of students since all four of the schools are close to major interstate highways. The following chart identifies the proposed magnet school and their feeder schools. Needs Assessment - 10 December 15, 2000 Little Rock School District FEEDER SCHOOLS Proposed Magnet Schools Feeder Schools J. A- Fair High School McClellan High School LR Central (attendance zone) Pulaski County ajacksonville High a Mills High North Pulaski High Oak Grove High Robinson High Sylvan Hills High North Little Rock Northeast High NLR West Benton School District Bryant School District Bauxite School District Private Schools Home Schools LR Central (attendance zone) Pulaski County Jacksonville High Mills High North Pulaski High Oak Grove High Robinson High Sylvan Hills High North Little Rock Northeast High NLR West Benton School District Bryant School District Bauxite School District Private Schools Home Schools Needs Assessment -11 December 17, 2000 Little Rock School District Proposed Magnet Schools Feeder Schools Mabelvale Middle School Little Rock School District Dunbar Middle (attendance zone) Forest Heights Middle Pulaski Heights Middle Pulaski County Schools Fuller Junior High Jacksonville Middle Jacksonville Junior Northwood Junior Oakgrove Junior Robinson Junior Sylvan Hills Junior North Little Rock Lakewood Middle Benton School District Bryant School District Bauxite School District Private Schools Home Schools Cloverdale Middle School Little Rock School District Dunbar Middle (attendance zone) Forest Heights Middle Pulaski Heights Middle Pulaski County Schools Fuller Junior High Jacksonville Middle Jacksonville Junior Northwood Junior Oakgrove Junior Robinson Junior Sylvan Hills Junior North Little Rock Lake wood Middle Benton School District Bryant School District Bauxite School District Private Schools Home Schools The enrollment for the 2000-01 school year is the baseline enrollment for the feeder schools. The following chart gives the enrollment in the feeder schools on September 30, 2000. In addition, it projects the enrollment for each of the project years. Needs Assessment - 12 December 15. 2000 Little Rock School District SCHOOL/ YEAR Baseline Data Oct. 1. 2000 Little Rock Schools Central High Dunbar Middle (attendance zone) Forest Heights Middle Pulaski Heights Middle FEEDER SCHOOLS ENROLLMENT BASELINE AND PROJECTED # African- American Students % African- American Students 1144 441 497 421 55% 59% 65% 56% # Other Students % Other Students TOTAL 928 306 262 328 45% 41% 35% 44% 2072 747 759 749 Pulaski County Schools Jacksonville High MiUs High North Pulaski High Oakgrove Junior/Senior High Robinson High Sylvan Hills High Fuller Junior High Jacksonville Middle Jacksonville Junior High 341 264 183 209 123 207 343 247 275 37% 41% 24% 26% 14% 28% 49% 39% 38% 579 379 566 597 764 529 364 390 452 Needs Assessment - 13 63% 59% 76% 74% 86% 72% 51% 61% 62% 920 643 749 806 887 736 707 637 727 December 15, 2000 Little Rock School District SCHOOL/ YEAR # African- American Students % African- American Students # Other Students % Other Students TOTAL Northwood Junior High Robinson Junior High Sylvan Hills Junior High North Little Rock Schools Northeast High NLR West High Lakewood Middle 201 104 246 163 578 163 25% 23% 28% 35% 49% 35% 605 349 641 298 590 298 75% 77% 72% 65% 51% 65% 806 453 887 461 1168 461 Benton School District grades 6-12 Bryant School District grades 6-12 Bauxite School District grades 6-12 Project Year 1 Data Oct. 1. 2001 Little Rock Schools Central High Dunbar Middle (attendance zone) Forest Heights Middle 108 5% 2071 95% 2179 56 2% 3067 98% 3123 0 0% 502 100% 1144 441 497 502 55% 60% 67% 928 294 243 45% 40% 33% 2072 735 740 Pulaski Heights Middle 421 57% 314 43% 735 Needs Assessment - 14 December 15, 2000 Little Rock School District SCHOOL/ YEAR # African- American Students % African- American Students # Other Students % Other Students TOTAL Pulaski County Schools Jacksonville High Mills High North Pulaski High Oakgrove Junior/Senior High Robinson High Sylvan Hills High Fuller Junior High Jacksonville Middle Jacksonville Junior High Northwood Junior High Robinson Junior High Sylvan Hills Junior High North Little Rock Schools Northeast High NLR West High Lakewood Middle 341 264 183 209 123 207 343 247 275 201 104 246 37% 43% 25% 26% 14% 28% 49% 40% 38% 25% 23% 28% 163 578 163 574 356 557 592 756 523 355 378 445 599 346 640 36% 49% 36% 293 590 296 Needs Assessment - 15 63% 57% 75% 74% 86% 72% 51% 60% 62% 75% 77% 72% 64% 51% 64% 915 620 740 801 879 730 698 625 720 800 450 886 456 1168 459 December 15, 2000 Little Rock School District SCHOOL/ TEAR # African- American Students % African- American Students # Other Students % Other Students TOTAL Benton School District grades 6-12 Bryant School District grades 6-12 Bauxite School District grades 6-12 Project Year 2 Data Oct. 1. 2002 Little Rock Schools Central High Dunbar Middle (attendance zone) Forest Heights Middle Pulaski Heights Middle Pulaski County Schools Jacksonville High MUIS High North Pulaski High Oakgrove Junlor/Senior High S. Robinson High 108 5% 2069 95% 2177 56 2% 3060 98% 3116 0 0% 499 100% 499 1130 441 497 421 341 264 183 209 123 55% 61% 68% 58% 38% 44% 25% 27% 14% 920 279 235 308 559 336 552 579 742 Needs Assessment - 16 45% 39% 32% 42% 62% 56% 75% 73% 86% 2050 720 732 729 900 600 735 788 865 December 15, 2000 Little Rock School District SCHOOL/ YEAR # African- American Students % African- American Students # Other Students % Other Students TOTAL Sylvan HUls High Fuller Junior High Jacksonville Middle Jacksonville Junior High Northwood Junior High Robinson Junior High Sylvan Hills Junior High 207 343 247 275 201 104 246 29% 50% 40% 38% 26% 24% 29% 508 345 368 443 579 336 608 71% 50% 60% 62% 74% 76% 71% 715 688 615 718 780 440 854 North Little Rock Schools Northeast High 163 37% 277 63% 440 NLR West High 578 50% 587 50% 1165 Lakewood Middle Benton School District grades 6-12 Bryant School District grades 6-12 Bauxite School District grades 6-12 Project Year 3 Data Oct. 1. 2003 Little Rock Schools 163 108 56 0 37% 283 63% 446 5% 2% 0% 2056 3046 500 95% 98% 100% 2164 3102 500 .. Central High 1144 56% 901 44% 2045 Needs Assessment - 17 December 15, 2000 Little Rock School District SCHOOL/ YEAR # African- American Students % African- American Students # Other Students % Other Students TOTAL Dunbar Middle (attendance zone) Forest Heights Middle Pulaski Heights Middle Pulaski County Schools Jacksonville High Mills High North Pulaski High Oakgrove Junlor/Senlor High Robinson High Sylvan Hills High Fuller Junior High Jacksonville Middle Jacksonville Junior High Northwood Junior High Robinson Junior High Sylvan Hills Junior High 441 497 421 341 264 183 209 123 207 343 247 275 201 104 246 59% 68% 57% 39% 42% 25% 27% 14% 30% 50% 41% 39% 26% 25% 30% 305 229 319 539 366 542 556 727 493 344 353 425 564 316 574 Needs Assessment - 18 41% 32% 43% 61% 58% 75% 73% 86% 70% 50% 59% 61% 74% 75% 70% 746 726 740 880 630 725 765 850 700 687 600 700 765 420 820 December 15, 2000 Little Rock School District SCHOOL/ YEAR # African- American Students % African- American Students # other Students % Other Students TOTAL North Little Rock Schools Northeast High NLR West High Lakewood Middle Benton School District grades 6-12 Bryant School District grades 6-12 163 578 163 108 56 39% 50% 38% 5% 2% 257 586 267 2060 3022 61% 50% 62% 95% 98% 420 1164 430 2168 3078 Bauxite School District grades 6-12 Private Schools 0 0% 480 100% 480 The magnet schools will also draw from private schools in the county. The private schools that will feed the magnet are listed in the chart below. The enrollment is not available broken down by race. PRIVATE SCHOOL ENROLLMENT School-/' Grade Levels " Enrollment V Arkansas Baptist School System Pre-K - 6 7-9 10 - 12 440 157 153 Cathedrcd School 6-9 513 Christ Lutheran School Pre-K - 8 6-9 497 no Christ the King Catholic Immaculate Conception K- 8 K- 8 706 441 LR Adventists Academy Our Lady of Good Counsel K- 10 Pre-K - 8 441 i 187 Needs Assessment - 19 December 15, 2000 Little Rock School District School Grade Levels Enrollment 4 , Our Lady of Holy Souls St. Edwards St. Theresas Shiloh Walnut Valley Anthony Catholic Faith Christian Mt. St. Marys Pulaski Academy Southwest Christian Home Schooling Pre-K - 8 K-8 K-8 1 -8 K- 12 Pre-K - 8 9-12 7-12 9-12 Pre-K - 12 Pre-K - 12 525 165 300 17 800 380 664 115 650 1350 471 The Little Rock area has a large number of parents who have opted for homeschooling for their children. The magnet schools will recruit among the home schooling students to attend the magnet programs. The following chart shows the number of students being home schooled in the three districts during the 2000- 2001 school year according to the Arkansas State Department of Education. The racial breakdown of home schooling is not available. NUMBER OF HOME SCHOOLED STUDENTS District i- # Students Home - Schooled: 2000-2001 w Little Rock North Little Rock Pulaski County Total 545 131 618 1294 aiKC32SS33BBEES 8 I y OBJECTIVE 1.2 By June 30, 2004, as a result of the opening of the four magnet schools, there will be no resulting negative impact - becoming African-American student isolated - on the feeder schools, as verified by school and district enrollment records. Needs Assessment - 20December 15, 2000 Little Rock School District The MSAP is also concerned about the assignment of students within the school. The district will monitor the way in which students are assigned to classrooms. The goal is to assure that there are not racially identifiable classrooms within the magnet school. OBJECTIVE 1.3 By June 30, 2002 and for each succeeding school year, students will be placed in the magnet program in a manner wherein classes reflect the same African- American/Other distribution (+/- 10%) as the school as evidenced by school class assignment records. NEED II: The Little Rock School District needs magnet schools that promote national, state, and local systemic reforms and are aligned with challenging state content standards and student ___________performance standards._____________________________________________ The State of Arkansas has adopted the goals of America 2000 as its goals for systemic school reform. These goals are to be met through the implementation of the Arkansas Curriculum Frameworks. These frameworks outline the major content areas and challenging student performance standards for each content area. These standards are the basis for the program designs for the magnet schools included in this application. Arkansas Goals 2000 Arkansas Education Goals: Working Together for Americas Future Readiness for School By the year 2000, all children will start school ready to learn. School Completion By the year 2000, the high school graduation rate will increase to at least 90 percent Student Achievement and Citizenship By the year 2000, students will leave grades four, eight and twelve having demonstrated competency tn challenging subject matter including English, mathematics, science, history, and geography: and every school in the State will ensure that all students learn to use their minds well, so they may be prepared for responsible citizenship, further learning, and productive employment in our modem economy._________________________________________________________________________ Needs Assessment - 21December 15, 2000 Little Rock School District Science and Mathematics By the year 2000, students will be first in the nation in science and mathematics achievement Safe, Disciplined, and Drug-Free Schools By the year 2000, every school in the State will be free of drugs and violence and wUl offer a disciplined environment conducive to learning. Adult Literacy and Lifelong Learning By the year 2000, every adult in the State wUl be literate and will possess the knowledge and skills necessary to compete in a global economy and exercise the rights and responsibilities of cidzenshtp.____________________________________________ The Little Rock School District has established priorities that parallel those of the state. The LRSD priorities are detailed in the following chart. 1. 2. 3. 4. LRSD GOALS: PATHWAY INTO THE FUTURE___________________ Improved Learning CUmate - The district will reduce the number of suspensions, expulsions, and drop-outs. The schools will be safe and free from crime. Improved Student Achievement - The district will align curriculum with the state frameworks and use a standards-based curriculum in language arts, mathematics, social studies, and science. The district will imtiate steps so that more African-American students take Advanced Placement courses. Getting Students Ready of the Working World - The district wiU blend academic training with real-life work experiences. Computer technology will be integrated into the curriculum. Technology literacy standards have been established for every student. Improve Mathematics Performance - The district is participating in a National Science Foundation project to improve mathematics and science instruction over a five year period. The project Includes training for teachers and efforts to increase the number of students taking upper level math courses. These goals are embodied in the District Strategic Plan which identifies three specific objectives that the community should use to judge the success of the district. Needs Assessment - 22December 15, 2000 Little Rock School District Little Rock School District Strategic Objectives Each Student will set and achieve challenging educational goals tailored to his or her interests, abilities and aspirations related to meaningful work, higher learning. citizenship or service to others. By 2003. at least 9 out of 10 students will meet or performance identified in the core curriculum. exceed LRSD standards of By 2003, at least 65% of students in every identified sub-group of race and gender _______f oKrviro the notinnai a VP r a OP in reading and mathematics on will perform at or above the national average in standardized tests
at least 30% will perform at the highest quartile in reading and mathematics on standardized tests
and no more than 10% will perform at the lowest quartile in reading and mathematics n standardized tests. The State of Arkansas has an accountability system to reinforce its goals for student achievement. This is the Arkansas Comprehensive TesUng, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACTAAP). The goal of the program is to ensure that all students in the public schools of the state demonstrate grade-level academic proficiency through the application of knowledge and skills in the core academic subjects consistent with state curriculum frameworks, performance standards. and assessments. The first component of the plan is a set of clear, challenging academic standards which define what students should be able to so in the basic academic core subiects. These are delineated in ten state curriculum framework documents. . 1 ____________J - rt Based on these frameworks, student achievement is assessed according to the time line on the following chart. State-Mandated Assessments Assessments Grade Level Month Administered Primary Benchmark Intermediate Benchmark Middle Level Benchmark End of Course- Algebra 1 End of Course- Geometry End of Course- Literacy Norm-Referenced Grade 4 Grade 6 Grade 8 When Completed When Completed Grade 11 Grades 5.7, and 10 April April April January/May January/May January/May September S a I a I Needs Assessment - 23December 15, 2000 Little Rock School District Student Achievement and Citizenship, and Science and Mathematics and all of the LRSD goals. As such, the MSAP project has objectives that directly relate to the local efforts of systemic reform and are aligned with challenging state content and performance standards. The schools will address the testing program and the system for accountability under the fourth objective of this application. OBJECTIVE 2.1 By June 30, 2002 and for each succeeding school year, the project design of the four magnet schools will show evidence of the use of challenging instructional materials and content that will meet state performance standards as evidenced by observations of classrooms by an outside evaluator. OBJECTIVE 2.2 By June 30, 2002 and for each succeeding school year, the instructional staff at the magnet schools will have a clear understanding of State content and performance standards and provide instructional programs based on those standards as evidenced by the responses to a teacher survey and the classroom observation of an outside evaluator. OBJECTIVE 2.3 By June 30, 2002 and for each succeeding school year, at least 60% of the parents responding to the annual survey will have participated in school activities as evidenced by the responses to a parent survey in the spring of each project year administered by an independent outside evaluator. OBJECTIVE 2.4 By June 30, 2004, there will be at least a 50% increase in the number of volunteer hours at the four schools compared to the base year 2000-01 as documented by the school volunteer logs collected and compiled annually the spring of each project year administered by an independent outside evaluator. Needs Assessment - 24December 15, 2000 Little Rock School District NEED III: The Little Rock School District needs to develop Innovative educational methods and pr
This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.