K / LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIST. v. PULASKI COUNTY cite M 964 F.Supp. 326 (1964) 353 oard of i982), ry of de udgments is District ' Arkansas, /icts in the uty to elimi- ate-mandated snn V. Char- of Bdueaiion, 28 L.Ed.2d S54 if Missouri, 781 1984), at n, 10. istrict transfers, i. pattern of an- mce of all parts le county u.s the Unit, the history in'i'ica, and the Il's supervisory listricts demon- icts historically und were not tonomous, Ev- pp. 428 (D.Del, 7, The governmental actions affecting housing patterns in Pulaski County have had a significant interdistrict effect on the schools In Pulaski County, which has resulted in the great dispurity in the racial composition of the student bodies of the Little Rock district and the two defendants districts. Swann v. Charlotte Mecklen- I J School District suit in further- to eliminate all >c and brunch, orders of thiis aied education r, Charlotie 'afioH, ctu^jro,' >>i, niipra. In iichievc inter- J I I fregated resi- iiur^ Soard of Edu,ealion, eupra. fi. The segregative actions taken by the two defendant districts and their failure to take desegregative actions have had a significant interdistrict effect on the achnols in Pulaski County, which has also contributed to the great disparity in the racial composition of the student bodies of the Little Rock district and the two defendant districw. Swann v. Charlotte Mechlou burg Soard of Education, supra. [2] 9, The Pulaski County Special School District has committed the following purposeful acts with continuing racially segregative intcrdistrict effoew: (a) failed to adhere to the requirements of the /!i)h namon decree
(b) constructed schools in locutions which ensured that they would be racially identifiable schools
(c) failed to apportion the burdens of transportation equally on black and white students
(d) refused to hire und promote bluck faculty and stuff
(e) refused to allow deanne.xa- tion to or consolidation with the other two districts
(f) failed to assign students to schools in such a way as to maximise desegregation
(g) assigned students to special education classifications and gifted progrums on u discriminatory basis
(h) assigned black principals to schools with high black enrollments
(i) created and maintained a racial imbalance in almost half its schools
and (j) closed and downgraded schools in black neighborhoods and failed to build new schools there. 10. The North Little Rock School District has committed the following purposeful acts with continuing racially segregative interdistrict effects
(a) failed to assign blacks to its central administration or to high school principalships and couching pcBitions
(b) concentrated whiles in schools north of Intersute 40 and blacks in schools south of It
(c) assigned students to special education classifications on a discriminatory basis
and (d) failed to apportion Uie burdens of transportulion equally on black and white students. 11. When Pulaski County Special School District and North Little Rock School District took the purposeful acts set forth in Conclusion Nos. 9 and 10 above, they knew or should have known that they would have iiiterdistrict segregative effects, 12. The unconstitutional and racially discriminatory acta of the Pulaski County and North Little Rock School Districts have resulted in significant und substuntiul inter- district segregation. Milliken r. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717, 744, 94 S.Ct. 3112, 3127, 41 L.Ed.2d 1069. 13. Since there are constitutional violations with interdislrict effects, an interdis- tricl remedy is appropriuie. Milliken c. Bradley, aupra
Liddell v. State of Missouri, supra. The remedial hearing will begin April 30, 1984. 14. The Pulaski County Board of Education and Arkansas Stute Board of Education are necessary parties who must be mado subject to the Court's remedial order. 1 I li I J ( County have degree by the 11 bodies, act- ler, with the exKtsn I Tb
i. ELSMrS'TAAV BCHOOLS: FACIUTIEB, SNROLLMeNTlANO I iitcrssis, and a series of ing choices. 2S4, 96 a.Ct. : Sii'onn u (I of Educa' NAME LiUk RatM 1) Rrtd)' 8) FiA Firli I) Frn?ir 0 PulltiH|ht Bl 11 MeOsritou 7) MiidftwiliK 11 Tvry LT.' H a 11 'Sll 17 'SA '4 l^il eo.s- Dl. TIOX OSAOSI CAPACITY* mt KNtl.MT * utilization BLACK exsi.MT. 4 BL IIU TCHBI, IL, TCHBt. ADWM I ASKsa I s 3 I 3 3 9 3 i I K-3 K-A X B X 3 K-1 ..HI 121 ITS sss ,7W Ml) 30 B40 904 94B 430 W7 430 113 ,791 94 73 77 7} 71 M 97 xi w7l -* 2M 1H0 310 309 113 UO 301 340 n 79 b: 77 44 71 73 U 71 WI ii.i a 294 144 U! 01 ^114 i.i III 11 11 i.i i.t 1.1 1.1 . u I 9 I 1 0 0 9 U 4 ^5^ .. I t *I I 354 NAME YKAU Bl.T. CfW. IN TIUN 1 t I r t i I LiUlv Hin'k 19} lil 111 Ckrvir If) Iih 19) irittMll 14) Dm IS] II) lUmiii *99 *34 *04 'W 17 11 17) VMtmKk *M UI ViHUffli III WllMl Totti: U I I 9 I I 8 I . >9 I I 5 f ) I 584 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT ('A MA rn" ITHi KNIlluMT. I^ATHJN HLtCK KNKLMT. HL r*! Tt'HIlM. HL TrHiW. a AD.MRX A41.MAM li 1 * a*f af t44mi ti, *1^ pi.i X 4 X-l X-0 X 0 KU X 0 XU 1-0 XU KU 800 410 400 174 >00 400 MO __BU ftW BOO UO 414 Ml NO 177 MB Ut 111 4M 470 . f I.7B4 7.691 S' tuhowfii________ IJBft 91 104 It lU IN IT 101 149 91 M m 9 411 117 810 m 993 4M 10 100 too lOO 71 M IS 111 17,7 M.I , 11.1 tl.l 18.4 71 11.9 94 II 1.0 10.9 171 I 1 I I I I 1 1 I 9 ft 1 9 ft ( { I '* Frublel*Mrm nvi IntlurtMi In upliity teuol. NAMS YBAR BU. CON. Dl> flON aHAOKH CAFA. CITY ll RNRLHT. %UTIL> IRATION Lluh tok lau?tdliu BIwmUry ikhwli 10! BmUp 91) rhUla M) Oirlud M) aibha M) PulukiMU. U) RBibhllf 90) SUpUn* ri VMhiifwi Ttti
MAMI WrU< Lhtf Hart M] AinMy III A>tnu W) BaivoM ni lnh. It) CmtvnO U) QhpHtv Ml lill&aKli. Ml UlMvaM Ml Ur/ 17) LyiHDp. Ill HmOP)l Ml H. Malibu 40) FnrhHlI] 411 41) Flit U) 1U49M 441 BMC>1r 44) MnatlMU TaUl? lie ri ft,741 4T 01 70% Ml M0.9 11-9 1.0 lets 1 1 It I 9 BUCK BNRLMT- HL. IIW TCIiBI. BL TCRRi ADUM. I AOXR& J 'M * U *t 19 'tb 80 9 8 3 9 ft I 5 I 4U 4^0 4 4 4U 4 0 4U 4*0 Ml S49 340 173 WO UO 42fi | 471 4 M4 411 <91 Ml W7 M Oft 191 III M iff n Ml M7 III 404 MB M 117 ftilM M7I 63 71 19 17 01 71 71 to 104 93.4 HO n.0 91.4 HI 114 17.4 lUO 19.1 7.0 111 191 1.0 14 94 1.1 71.0 YEAR BLT. CON. 01. TION Okadrs CAFA* CITY' UM BxnLMr. 1 UTIL. SATN- BLaCX" EMRI.MT HL TCiiar IL TCXM 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I adkri. I 9 I 1 ft 0 9 0 I AOM, XU x-o X I K-0 X-O KU KU KI KU KU KU KU XU KU KU X I x-o KU 170 409 9W 4M 300 300 470 100 100 400 IM 300 440 BU 4M 940 UO 4M 7.904 M EM IM MO 911 IM 494 HI Ml 349 IM 4M Ml 104 8M Mt SO 375 SAM 71 M 01 100 Tft tt 19 M U M n It M to M 41 M 13 17 71 11 07 N It 197 H IM lot 101 N 10 111 111 70 104 <7t IJQ7 * htimiind fnn UM llUmM4/ lANlIrniBU. U
ft| hi|hMt rw. r9UK<M. H 98 10 H 41 11 II 40 U 39 41 13 97 M Bl II II M 311 M.> 11.4 134 44.1 114 11.4 tf.t 4 114 tie n.ft ai H.e M.ft 11.4 114 HO 944 nui 40 LO 1.0 9 M U u 1.0 90 U 4.0 70 IJ U 41 1.3 44 4.4 ILO I 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I 0 ft ft ft 0 9 0 I ft 0 0 0 0 9 0 I 9 0 ' I . 1 I II I I 9<u nM Olnailjr anitabia an alMtrtartea itulMtt Alts, dlauifi d nst i1lilln|vil& Slaak fiwi otha? mlaaHi/ ituOlfttS la rwarti. SHlisKn aM by littr>eUtli| ft(n Iwa rapeni. HAMS Canity 411 ApbiM 47) Ambld Ml BMittt 41) labar 40) BOMJIfia III la/MMai* 49} Cau HI ChlMC ^1 Cttwlak-.. 43) CII.9U YEAR BLT. C05. 01. TIO.Y flRADU CSfA- CITY IMS RNRLMT. UTIL. HATION BUCK e.sxlmT. 1 IL TCXU. IL TCM1 I DXM. ADMU 'M NA 'll 'H H 17 74 71 I HA I I I I X I x-o X I K-< K-4 K.4 K.4 X I WO IM MO ftoo 400 WO OM M7 4tl 341 2M M3 OlS 000 004 111 to lot M tl7 IM lOl in III to 1U 4 03 10 14 ns H 11 u 1 41 9 9 31 14.0 lie 10.0 11.0 97.6 MO HO M.O 90 40 4.9 le 1.9 3.0 1.0 to 0 0 0 0 I 9 0 0 i It I K ri u* II 1.4 i-O 1 I CfC) 2 v .<v' I/ / i 1 s ! i little rock school DIST. r * R AhMRt 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 it 1 0 6 1 0 0 0 I 0 6 ADM8I. I aDmri. 'A 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 ft 0 1 9 0 ft 9 1 rnunlv >,) Cm ) DM, 61) Dwprn U) 61) RiFmJ II) ^MlUKVlt. 66) (an^mvk 64) Lawhr M) Mlbilviit 69) OtkftrMai 67} Ou Cnv U) OtMrCnik 61) Pin* Pork 7ft) 71) RoOIrua 7|) Smh n} IbUWMd 74) Sylvia HJi. 71) Tsyltr 76) ToltIMA 77) WiUhtld 71) Wiuea Tftuii YK.\H Ill.T. VIIN-HI-THIS (UiAbh
* AOMRS. s ADM. .SAM Lil< Baek 7ft) Dunbir ChOA< 584F.aupp..U8 (1964) V. PULASKI COUNTY 355 CITY KSIll MT ' UTtl. fZATins IIIaAI'K >:.V1(J,.MT. HI.. IS'HRm. H AliftlllS. AHUKS 1 16 0 0 0 9 0 ft ft 1 0 9 ft 0 ft 0 ft 1 9 0 2 1 ^ns. ina4 h/ B ADMAI 0 0 9 9 0 ft 0 0 01 *64 ll 'll ftl '56 *8t V 6ft '10 71 71 10 74 74 '30 '69 6ft '10 NA ft! '67 YEAR ALT, '20 - ftBftkKU....- 8S) IlMdmOT - ID m PyiuMHu. 64) bulhwMi Ttm
Nwh LttU Rwk W) Cintritl U) UktWMrI 17) RIdrtreU SI) iUMCty TeUl. Pu:*ikl C.-uftty M) Mil/ tl) Jkinvlt/NQ tD Jbn^iH/la Ift) MlMiViia 14) .Srt)iw>M4 66) RftbinkM *6) Sylvin K!|. Tsiil! * Ml04l*Hhai I 2 I 8 I I I ft a I s 1 1I I 1 I 2 1 .SA 1 } COS. Dt-t: on 2 '64 66 11 'M NA NA NA ma -w *94 'ftft 'M M '76 '14 69 X K'6 X-6 K-6 x-i K 6 x-a X.6 K-0 K-6 X-6 X>6 K.| xa XI X-6 X-6 X-6 K-ft K-6 K-l Sftft na 4ft0 40ft isa KO 464 4H I.IU 77ft 490 960 .IM 609 7tft 9M 609 IM .MO ftsa lift 7IQ 600 7ftft 67ft 600 H.m SOO . .<^SQ 14 11 101 121 Iftft 11 91 11? U Ifta iw ifto Sift 4.6 SO 4.0 1.9 1 I 1 1 fl 0 600 754 617 UI Ml 411 au 444 la 647 477 Si4 174 7Sft 4M aw its aw 16.021 as Oft lift lift iftt ftS 71 It IM in tft 41 lift IM M U St 111 t4 lU 4 141 II II TO 91 181 *4 II 16ft 111 110 61 170 534 IJ4I 14 I M It 10 16 18 83 M 49 0 16 84 16 13 42 ft4< lO.Q 21.0 III SiO 8t0 no 10.9 U.9 n.9 100 11.6 ro UJ 20.0 SII lO.ft VA nt.i to 33^ exNIUT! Tih ,. JUNIOR IIION ROHOOUI Rri^iutiu, rnrollmknts, and sTArr CRaDU CAPA. CHY lira ENdLMT. I L'Tfb UTS, BUCK ENALMT. lu. 1114 XKU 7-0 8 woL,7t 2 3 2 I ,Sa Na MA NA 2 3 S 2 I ft 1 t 7-ft 7 I 7 7 I 7-1 b.ft 7.1 7-6 7 1 7 t 7-9 ft 6 7^9 7-^ F5 7Sft taa 661 TOO TOO 4J76 l.QOO U6 1J)OQ 400 1.200 747 7'fi 616 IM U7 1.000 77S 07j 1401 992 M] 6ft4 600 710 4Jr ftift ait3 4 2,411 *640 4W Ml 970 611 076 4n ft4S 9,902 U.9 w 16 W tm SI u 6ft IM la* 4ft4 ftftl ftftO 417 2.0W 71 M W tn 1 117 209 164 7.14 30 12 u Oil 67 M 64 72 M 02 99 *6 Ift? Ill 1.44 W It 14 106 1.M2 W 2ft 27 ft U 1)W SA 4.6 IQ 6.0 6.0 4.9 40 6.0 6.0 4.0 1,0 Al 4.9 1.0 1.0 6.0 14M IL TCKIi. 14,4 . 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I I 1w ft 0 0 ft 0 0 9 0 1 ft 0 0 9 0 1 1 0 6 I 1I I AOMRI. D AD.SKI. > S .6 14.0 wo Sift 54.0 W.ft 37.6 lU 112.0 61.6 ftSJI 92.1 ftl.O 4?.ft K.6 47ft lOt.B IH 1.0 1.B Ml tJ 4.6 6.0 7.0 27.0 SAtta-. lift l.ft 7,0 6A 7,0 6.6 6 ft U.S ft I 3 II 2 SII 7 I 1 1 I 0 9 16 1 2 28 a6 I It I t 9 I 1 6 I II , 7 - J 1 xj i /hHi .' 1 E i 356 584 FEDEKAL SUPPLEMENT I I CXKI8IT> I . - I Hi Tibk IQ. BRNlOilKiaHKCHUtiUi rAUUTiCS.INX0LLMSNT8,ANDSTArr XANI IT) Cittftl M) Klt 99) Fvkviiv TUl: YCAB LT. COX* Db fiox cxAnr.8 CArA> CITY IHQ KNRLMt *UTfT^ 8ATH. AUfX ENRbMT. 8U itu TCHM. lU TCHM. I AOMM. ARMU. f ll *M I I t IQ 18 ICkll 10-14 1,909 I.IRQ 1.698 4,187 1,918 l,QB4 1,8 4Jtl 101 91 110 104* I.IQQ H4 788 1.4 M SB an I4 <1.4 <7.9 tt.O 11.6 .O 17.9 M.e I 4 4 14 8 I Worth Utti IUe9 190) HtrMiiHl Ml) Ok Hiin Tout! 198) nir 161) JukiRvla. 104) HfOtUM IQI) Ml 164) Oik Orav* 197) N. Hillki IM) KoktAMn 109) Srl>ia Hb. TM): TO t4 *1 'M '84 99 *93 71 '84 'M 1 I I 8 9 I 8 8 10-18 IQ-IS T-12 l^M M 18 11^11 r.it ICkM IM 10 18 1,400 1,006 3,466 un 1^ 1.494 949 971 13 ni H9 *1.911 1,OM 1,Q3 8.133 m 1,181 1.478 1,090 824 734 411 884 7379 7B H 91* tt4 199 977 r 39 33* M.B MB 134.0 194 lU tio 8 t 9 1 I 68 97 168 IM in 49 H 94 m n ai IM ,0. lU 41 u U9 1,497 It a ]> 4Q 14 11 14 lQ 48.4 44.4 7U6 10.6 436 94.0 91.0 436 8W.0 16.4 86 11-0 11.6 3.6 4.6 76 79 Mi 6 3 1 6 I I 8 I I 21 6 I1 11 ( I Rollin FROST. Plaintiff, V, CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 83-1169. f i United States District Court, D. Hawaii. I April IS, 1984. I ( I I I I Secliun 1983 action was brought against city and county and others to recover damages arising out of alleged boating of plaintiff by police officers. On defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state claim and un ground that complaint was vague and conelusory, the District Court, Fong, J., hold that
(1) fact that recourse tu state tort remedies was available to person who was allegedly beaten by police who responded to domestic disturbance call did not preclude section 1983 action in federal court for deprivation of substantive due process, given the alleged liberty deprivation sufficiently serious to shock the conscience and officers willful and deliberate abuse of state authority, in manner which could not be characterised as random, and (2) construing complaint liberally, it was not so vague and conelusory as to warrant dismissal, particularly at early stage of proceedings and In view of fact that some defendants were os yet unidentified. Motion denied. I I. Consiitutiunal Law <*252.5 Ideiitifkatiun of specific requiremenU c>f due process requires consideration of, among other factors, nature of the affected interest, and implicit In that principle is recoKniiiun that some Interests, by their very nature, require more procedural pro-tGctioriR than others. Amend. 14. U.S.C.A. Const. I 2. Civil Rights *^13.9 Fact that recourse to state tort reme-dins was available to person who was allegedly bcaton by police who responded to domestic disturbance call did not preclude section 1983 action in federal court for deprivation of substantive due process, given the alleged liberty deprivation suffi-i i .Ji V ' lJ? 1 I SCHOOL 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 Central Fair Hall MoClellan Parkview 2112 995 1397 1259 1150 2150 936 1220 1200 991 2150 936 1220 1200 991 2050 936 1220 1200 991/846 Cloverdale Jr. Dunbar Forest Heights Henderson Mabelvale Jr. Mann Pulaski Heights Jr. Southwest 657 792 843 990 669 975 774 807 750 1000 780 960 600 935 700 754 750 1000 780 960 600 935 700 754 750 812 780 960 600 935 700 754 Badgett Bale Ba.seline Booker Brady Carver Chicot Cloverdale Dodd Fair Park Forest Park Franklin Fulbright Garland Geyer Springs Gibbs Ish Jefferson Mabelvale McDermott Meadowcliff Mitchell Otter Creek Pulaski Heights Rightsell Rockefeller Romine Stephens Terry Wakefield Washington Watson Western Hills Williams Wilson Woodruff King 303 397 492 720 440 475 634 394 422 346 440 467 535 397 235 348 256 488 558 483 465 326 374 378 328 414 510 306 515 472 305 492 328 530 418 268 374 278 394 417 660 420 472 563 420 424 351 461 447 607 320 235 351 220 490 541 531 465 280 383 328 280 320 467 260 537 472 Closed 472 328 515 409 245 Closed 258 397 417 656 480 613 543 422 403 359 436 463 612 320/316 237 351 180 473 564 559 454 280/273 383 328 234/240 484 260 537 472 840 472 328 515 504 209
0/297 257 415 390 656 491 613 558 464 386 383 403 484 587 300 255 351/332 200 513 562 562 481 280/273 378 378 240 320 537 260 537 517 866 537 355 517 428 209 SUPPORT SERVICSS The function of the Division of Support Services shall be to 1 a
5'$- rovice all of positive arrangements and services necessary to the promotion school climate, an environment of learning, quate supplies and equipment in each build ilities A District is committed to and making al magnets, this e.n and adeing and classroom. providing clean, safe facilities repairs fundamental to academies, ma itain incentive schools. and secondary schools in good condition. , roofing repairs, painting, plastering. other needed repairs will be made. drives will be in good repair. New public address systems buildings where such items correctly. To recarpeting, and Concrete walks and macadam and bell systems will be placed in are not adequate or not functioning Any school which . has portable .these portables replaced buildings will have with new units or repaired such that they will be in a .condition suitable to housing a class and pro- vide a positive environment for The capacities light of needed as necessary. learning. of Junior high schools will be reviewed in programs. Such capacities will then be If upon review. Junior high capacity exists in the Distr needs of the District revised it is determined that inadequate or to meet programmatic and/or intradistrict and M-to-M needs as they develop, then an adequate will begin for the Appropriate site will be located and planning construction of parties. including a new Junior high school. curriculum specialists and 174 01689associate superintendents, will be involved in the planning process. Construction of this junior high school will be completed on timeline comparable to that followed for other newly a constructed Dlstrict/magnet schools and in a manner commensurate with building needs. The Purchasing Department will work with staff and principals in all schools to provide all necessary materials and equipment basis to school goal achievement. Dara Processing The Data Processing Department will provide the necessary support for all school and central office-based functions. Programs will be developed and implemented relative to the following areas: Dropout Statistics (to include the ability to generate data I** by race, gender, grade and on -districtwide basis). a school by school as well as Scores (to include the CRTM and MAT-6 with capacity to score the tests and to generate data by school, subject area, and districtwide). race, gender, grade, Attendance (shall be kept in such a way as to allow data to be gathered for any period of time. for withdrawals and reenrollment , for students by grade. school. race. gender. and districtwide) . Disciplinary Data (by offense, ject, race, gender, districtwide and school, teacher, class, sub- over any period of time). 175 01690TO: Board of Directors FROM: THROUGH: SUBDECT: cc: October 15, 1987 Dames Dennings, Associate Superintendent - Desegregation Dr. George Cannon, Interim Superintenden Enrollment Report - October 1, 1987 Executive StaffTOTAL ENROLLMENT Senior High Schools Central Fair Hall McClellan Parkview Metropolitan TOTAL HIGH SCHOOLS Junior High Schools Cloverdale Dunbar Forest Heights Henderson Mabelvale Mann Pulaski Heights Southwest TOTAL JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS ENROLLMENT REPORT October 1, 1987 enrollment 26,853 2108 882 1448 1278 833 15 6566 678 682 862 1033 672 653 754 804 6138 X BLACK 61 57 48 50 38 55 80 51 63 68 62 60 50 53 63 66 61Elementary Schools Badgett Bale Baseline Brady Chicot Cloverdale Dodd Fair Park Forest Park Franklin Fulbright Garland Geyer Springs Ish Jef ferson King Mabelvale McDermott Meadoucliff Mi tchel1 Otter Creek Pulaski Heights Rightsell Rockefeller Romine Stephens Terry Wakefield Washington Watson Western Hills Wilson Woodruff Total 230 337 448 423 642 408 338 315 426 403 503 323 235 214 462 263 546 471 443 256 325 340 246 283 484 218 481 467 214 431 314 407 223 12,383 72 70 71 65 57 64 61 63 53 72 57 85 66 81 56 81 53 56 65 86 60 75 77 87 71 30 57 62 33 63 61 71 76 67 Elementary Magnet Schools Booker Carver Gibbs Will lams Total 638 362 265 436 1 .753 51 43 43 50 50 TOTAL ELEMENTARY 14,148 85 Special Schools I 0Mc! uml cwnuuLntii i ot B = Black W .= White 0 - Others October 1, 1935 1. School Year
1986-87 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS SCHOOL Unaraded B j 0 T . .W GRADE 7 I I. B 0 ^DJ__8 W B 0 il GRADE ' 9 W B 0 Sub-Total W B 0 I Sub j, iTot.., iSI BI.- Kindergarten ___ W B O' W GRAND 8 TOTAL 0 Total JBl. ! Dunbar Forest Heights Henderson 2 5 0 47 36 87 121 187 135 1 1 3 53 38 94 125 198 157 1 0 4 68 53 100 119 175 177 1 3 4 168 127 283 365 560 474 3 4 11 536 691 768 68 81 62 168 127 283 365 560 474 3 4 11 536 691 768 Mann 66 279 6 62 253 6 59 232 2 187 764 14 965 79 187 764 14 965 Pulaski Heights Southwest TOTAL 2 5 0 89 54 379 136 181 1039 0 3 14 77 65 389 168 159 1060 3 5 19 106 140 3 272 .444 6 722 61 272 444 6 722 55 144 2 174 484 10 668 174 I 484 10 668 441 987 15 1211 3091 48 4350 71 1211 3091 48 4350 2. 1 62 79 61 72 I 71 I 1 t T ! i I I > I I + i I I i i I I ,1OCTOBER 1, 1986 B = Black H = White ' 0 - Others School Year: 1986-fi7 ACTUAL ENROLLMENT BY RACE SPECIAl SCHOOLS* SCHOOL Easter Seal Francis Allen Fullerton uacKson county Learning Center Pathfinder LniiQ^stuoy tenter 3rd Tlocr Dav Treattont Proo Frankie Dennie - United C. Palsv TOTAL *Handicapped Schoo 5. Ungraded I GR.ADE 8__ 'J I g i 0 GRADE 9 . I B 0 GRADE n w B 0 OK 1 1 I Sub-iotal W B 0 Sub IXBl. wb K Kindergarten W B ' & w GRAND TOTAl B U lOtai Bl.'i -/ith Kl 1 2 1 2 I I I 1 2 1 2 5 0 I 1 5 0 2 1 2 66 122 jna M 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 2 1 0 I i i 6. 66 I 100 J i 100
i I I T i i I T I I I iB = Black W .= White 0 - Others School Year: 1986-87 SCHOOL Unqraded W B 0 ? I GRADE to' W B 0 Central Hall Parkview Metropolitan 3 12 5 297 209 51 530 211 13 2. i TOTAL 3. 15 5 522 I111Z2 12 GRADE 11 W 277 195 99 521 S~1 0 325 231 12 1 4 19 ACTUAL ENROLLMENT BY RACE OCTOBER 1, .1996. HIGH SCHOOLS ti GRADE 12 T Sub-Total W B 0 W B 0 Sub Tot.. IB1 Kindergarten w B' 0 U B 0 Total %B1. 248 IlL 101 500 326 130 244 700 3. 82? 555 291 3 118.1 595 JSl 16 34 3. 5. 0 2037 1159 1050 19 15 1121 2543 51 4265 jsa 51 72 84 60 7 30 2 14 (,7 0 0 822 578 298 3 IZfil 1232 521 755 16 2fi,ia 34 9 8 0 51 I i T ! t 2088 1184 1071 19 4362 59 21 84 60 I I I I J I I i I I I I I I 1 I IACTUAL EHROLLMEHT BY RACE OCTOBER 1, 1986 ' , B = Black W = White .0 - Others School Year: 1986-87 INTERMEDIATE SCHOOLS SCHOOL ~l Upgraded GRADE A 3. 0 Ji R 0 GRADE Ji L. 5 0 I GRADE Ji 5. 6 0 Booker 4 28 2 -n 21 2 52 202 2 7? 22 2- Franklin Garland 2 11 1 26 12 Gibbs 2 Sub-Total A 0 Sub Tot.. erqarten 0 GRAND TOTAL R 21 Total 5B1. Pulaski Heights Rockefeller Stephens Washington Total 12 39 -.1 31 2 17 29 207 TOTAL 55 25 86 90 22 71 56 644 I I T 2 2 5 1 1 0 0 8 22 12 0 34 7 30 12 201 21 81 95 21 61 54 667 6 2 0 1 1 0 2 15 32 15 2 27 2 20 13 184 T 215 292 2 512 52 215 297 2 SIQ 57 22 81 82 97 52 58 60 605 4 0 1 1 1 0 11 102 58 4 92 12 67 54 604 255 242 255 282 252 190 170 1955 12 2 0 3 2 1 2 35 369 212 259 377 222 258 226 2594 52 79 98 75 22 74 75 75 2 5 0 3 2 0 0 8 e,7 60 49 10 125 48 45 399 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 105 58 4 95 317 308 304 292 14 383 67 54 612 238 215 2354 22 2 2 2 2 1 2 35 i T 434 374 308 390 400 306 271 1 82 99 75 96 78 79 i J 2002 I J i I I ! i iOCTOBER 1, 1986 UI KHLt ELEMENTARY I I W - White B = Black 0 = Other Ungraded W School Year: 1986-87 Grade 1 W Grade 2 W SCHOOL B 0 B 0 B O-'- Bale 2 12 17 60 1 Carver 0 1 45 67 1 1 Ish 0 8 0 0 0 80 0 69 1 Ki ng 6 0 37 80 2 5 0 63 1 Mi tchel1 1 73 0 Rightsei 1 1 JI 60 79 0 JI Romine 12 61 69 13 Western Hills 83 26 32 Wi11i ams 33 0. 24 39 36 . Wilson 32 0 39 47 2 2 22 54 1 0 .T0TAL-4.x 20 0 136 609 5. 117 . '546 3 Grade 3 W B 0 6 1 0 37 0 66 50 2 49 0 44 0 48 11 52 0. 0 2 1 21 34 2. 29 1 35 16 44 3 0 91 454 9 Grade 4 W B 0 14 41 0 0 2 1 59 0 57 0 59 2 0 49 0 51 9 65 20 25 (1. 31 36 13 41 89 483 2 0 5 Grade 5 W B 0 11 46 0 0 52 0 0 2 1 1 13 21 28 9 86 51 0 44 4 49 39 61 20 40 41 443 JI J2_ 1 1 1 7 Grade 6 W B 0 14 34- 1 0 0 "S' SUB-TOT. W B 0 Sub >Total %BL. 71 275 Kindergar. W B 0 12 w GRAND TOTAL B 0 Total- 0'0] Ll 57 0 45 0 43 0 3 3 349 79 62 83 1 0 41 0 9 24 38 17 JI 2 38 1 56 1 27 37 47 108 425 2 152 0. 2 1 5 00 109 381 _____0 317 0 338 11 316 316 386 151 JI 2. 3. 2. 226 g- 274 4 529 2980 34 0 5 337 384- 318 371 jiia. 320 456 202 "435 387 , :3643. 99 71 3 8 428 79 1 0 452 100 QQ 25 20. 52 ' 71 82 43 2 0 455 99 0 0 16 20 10 0 360 37 3 375 46 n. 2 362 50 80 21 40 63 450 2 0 14 362 415 361 99 90 JI 1 a 0. 9 366 83 2. 22a QQ 172 200 119 692 466 4 2S2 21 172 2. 316. 50 226 a 432 22. 314 4 437 I 7? 3430 . 43 4165 82ACTUAL ENROLLMENT BY RACE . B Black W = White 0 - Others OCTOBER 1, 198 6 School Year: 1986-87 PRIMARY SCHOOLS SCHOOL __Ungraded T GRADE 1 GRADE 2 GRADE 3 Sub-Total Brady Fair Park Forest Park Fulbright Jefferson McDermott Meadowcliff Terry Woodruff Total w 0 2 4 1 0 w B 0 W B 0 w 1 0 0 Sub Tot,. i%i
bi.- Kindergarten O' GRAND B TOTAL 0 Total SBK J2. 2 21 19 a. 2 2 o-. ?3 18 35 12 21 31 38 55 24 316 3&. 8? 78 212 21 114 94 127 71 854 T I 2 2 1 j2 1 0 3 1 0 2 25. IB .34 19 55 27 29 36 13 143 -8S. BO 67 85 21 87 83 79 56 2 2 2 0 2 3. 2. 0. 3 I 640 Ho 22 2 7B 11 42 25 21 32. 14 1212 M 54. 22 56 22 22. 22 53 626 2 2 2 1 5 2 2 0 4 SA >,Z 94 51 175 83 Ifll 133 51 784 254 195 221 297 179 296 249 295 180 2139 i 2 2 0 Z. 6 2 1 2 21 309 7X1 290 348 .3B6 222 356 429 7.34 2944 8? 21 21 2 280 1 78 22 67 22 50. 22 70. 69 22. 22 12 53 22 71 45 22 61 12. 357 47 18 55. 4 26 77 31 21 244 1 2 0 0 1 1 JQ. 2 2 54 212. 87 222 128 139 194 68 I 1141 242 212 222 183 322 271 326 214 2383 1 4 2 2 7 1 1 2 22 232. 36.3 420 . 431 457- T 417 521 ! .3.667 58 79 42 7n 22 22 25. !67 I T i I I I i I -II I /o/^/Yo K LRSD School Checklist Senior High Schools [5] Grades 10-12 M-cl E........ Ha J A Fair Scm Stu..ar. SiH Barnho'jse s 1500 Park. 72202 376 475! 5201 Oov.d O Dodd. 72210 - 2 'I*:* '^:/^^05_661.9000 6609 . __ McCIe,^r, Rudoloh Ho.j
d
~^l7 G
yer Spcr?^. 7fM9~y^rO3T7 PorK-r.e.v r.ne Arts Mcgr.ef Jgn.oos Bobbs 2501 iarrow. 722'0^721 72204 . 225-6440 2 Vocational-Technical Center [1] Grades 10-12 Me'ropoliton - Dr. Doyle DiHohu7ty.' 7701ScottHc cmil 565-3465 Junloj^ High Schools [8] Grades 7-9 Clov^^ - Dexier Boorh - 6300 Hink Our,bar - Menon L :son Rd., 72209 - 565-3426 ecey - 1100 Wnght Ave.?~72206 - 375-5574 IP- /2:^J^_2=-2L:^s^:^^verjreen2^T5'^'^^^ Henderson - Brody Grodberry - 401 Barro ^c^^v al^Clein^ctts - 'TosTT'MJb^ Ivale W,. l^d.. 72205 - 225-3358 _____ _ PO Box 187. Mohelvole. 72103 - 455-2413 k^22jl^53-et_-_0_y
ctor Anderson I_____ Pulaski Heights - 0.-. J im 1000 . Roosevelt Rd., 72206 - 372-3123 Holey - 401 N. Pine, 72205 - 664.7073--------------------------- So_utl^Gaj Metoughlin - 330 1 j^nh 72204 . 565-4417 Elementory Schools [37] Grodes K-6 Badgett - Mary Golston Sale Levonni - 6900 Peecn Rood. 72206 - 490-1582 _____ . Wilson - 6501 W. 32nd. 72204 - 565-6621 Bosetine - Anno Tatu .____ Booker Arts Mpgnet - William Fin - 3623 Baseline Rd.. 72209 - 565-5589 n f 2016 Borber. 72206 - 376-3319 Brody - Helen Thomos - 7915 W. Morkhom, 72205 - 225-1817 Corver - Otis Preslor - 1 11 QQ Chir.-^t Rd., __ Box 405. Mcbelvole. 72103 - 568-2554 Cloverdale - Joequgline Dedm7 Pocid Robert Nelson n - 6500 Hinkson Rd., 72209 - 565-0986 -- ----------' 4423 Stogeeoqch Rd., 72204 - 45573110 __c2r_Pork - Catherine Gill - 616 N. Horrison, 72205 - 666-0359~ Forest Pork Virginio Ashley - 1600 N. Tyler, 722^ I Fronklin - .Connie Aston -
^'bright - Mcz Hufrmiicn 666-5415 1701 s. Horrison, 72204 - 666-0343 - 300 Pleoscnt Volley Dr., 72212 - 224-2350 i ! T I I I I T I I IT I 'I I I TX i T 278 221 ! 417 J_A_ j 420 r472 I I I 4. T T49 1 83 261 1133 -244 421 2ii ( nz 440 i 8 I i I 4 I TI I i I T T I I 1 232 i 64 I 394 I 6c. 365 ' n p85 I 261 ' i Bry I ! 448 I 98 . 46 ? ! 420 i pgfl I 424 j 351 2i 1 aza I (97 413 /tl- I 151 Kin. Je'ferson _377._^Fieryl A Simmons - 3615 W. 25th 72204 - Springs - Eleanor Co Gibbs Magnet - Doi j 451 I in I (5 7 1 550 ! 513 ! 25 ' 3(3 I 59?. ' 512^ I ^10 i 537, 538 OS IX Oevis 5240 Mobelvole Pike, 666-9436 72209 - 565-0184 1115 W. 16th. 72202 - 372-0251 Ish - Michoel Oli^77]ooTT^^k~2?76 - 376-362'7 _Morgarel Gremillion 2600 N. MeKin!ey.~72207 - 663-9472 Bo^b^e Goodwin__4800 W _ 26^ ^0^7^6'^6397 ! J.9 5~ i S7Z_ i ! 320 I 298 I 5 235 i in i /eV 303 ___ _517. 98' X 220 I I 211 I 1 ' 218 ' Mabelv_ale_. Oorothy__Fau_ikne^_ ^9 B07, Mobelvole. 72103 -'455-2227 490 "^*^7
A I T I SfZ I 541 I ISO I 3 37 I_____ l^cJOermof^^nn^^ore - 1200 Re" r _Meodowc^ff _._Jer^7^ Dr'~'-.La7.6, I _'^"chell - Donita_ Hy^s^eth^- 24 l_0 Satte'ry, '722O6'~375-6977 Otter Creek - Pot Price - Id'oOO 6tet~c7 servoir Rd.. 72207 - 225-6568 72209 . 565-0324 t aI Elementary Schools - {continud reek on back) y. 72209 . 55-3320 I T 4 531 I 2L2. ' 3-2<j 465 i m ' lie l?76 i ! 383 II 5^ I I 5. I I 221 7 I LRSD School Checklist jElemenfary Schooll [37] Grades K-6 (continued) Pulai!<i Heights Eddie McCoy 19 N. Pme. 72205 663-9469 Rightseii Kay Loss 911 W. 19th, 72206 374-7448 Rockefeller - Anne Mangon - 700 E. 17th. 72206 374-1226 Romine Lionel Word 340b~Romine Rd., 72204 - 22S-8833 Stephens Ston Strauss 3700 W. 18th, 72204 - 663-8374 Terry - Nancy Volsen - 10800 Mora Lynn Dr., 72211 225-1215 Wakefield - Lloyd Slock - 75 Westminster, 72209 - 568-3874 Washington - Lonnie Sue Deon - 115 W. 27th, 72206 - 375-8275 Watson - Dr. Diana doze - 7000 Volley Dr., 72209 - 565-1577 Western Hills - Margie Puckett - 4901 Western Hills, 72204 - 562-2247 Williams Magnet - Dr. Ed Jackson - 7301 Evergreen, 72207 - 666-0346 Wilson - Reine Price 4015 Stannus Rd., 72204 - 565-0924 Woodruff - Karen Buchanan - 3010 W. 7th, 72205 - 663-4149 3^ ._L55 j. 230-^25a
320 291 I Uio._Q5O_i I s: o -7 I 2?4 I Ig.tai s *260 spaces left open for white students. I -, il._. 1 n 9 7472 pll ' a.7 (^lt
6lQ0
340 I M2 ! 2&a- 3* 2^3 'c _5Ks 323 ! , /W I I S3 / I _______________ 409 i W7 I 178 J3S 245 I (It I /IV I
13 563. my i I I t I I j. I I T I T ! I I i T -x I i T T I T I i I i T I I I I T T I 1 I 9 + I I I TSCHOOL ^3//~ BLACK WHITE OTHER (/37 -y/3 /779 <90? CAP /3)^G ?// MIN Z BIX -77=7~ ^30 .373^ /979-70 CURR BIX MAX Z Bm ' O/D 77<9 /C35 \oo ee> 70C .^Ooo 3Z). co 333/(5 -^:,3/>t33- /^/)pe737:> 5/0/ /()7~ 3 ^777'.' -/(^y 933 ^67 ^/9 3-73 /?3 3i3O //3^ tiliC) 9<^O y// 7^C> y^c> /oO 3^0 /ovc 77.^^ 7^o^7 /T^tc /7(i(. ez>r /33i^l>Z> 3//^ 72>f/3^ (9/3CO-Z //t/Zi ^99 6-5C> 37^ 3^3 /<^S" ^^3 33^ 3>/^ /T'C 33 7 /9O K /V9 3/3 /oc 97 /75 /3 /67 /3C> 377 ~73<7> 397 (^/3 393 3~i7C> ^90 3^0 -7/7 33C 4- 39. ^C.cC -39.30 37^ ,^o7 33<9 3/C3 3/<i> 3>l 3-V3 33^ ^9^7) ^'GCO 3/(95 70/2 9>599 ^9.7? ^^.ct> 3^. OO y/cC '7/00 y/oo 7/cC) 'f^/CC ^7.7/ 333(9 7^./-:3 '/iS.<i>'/ <^/. /=2> 73-^^ //.73 70.^9 9-S-co ^70/ (9^.37, y/.co '//OC .oc> -36.^6 7i^.s6 3^^.oo y37) 7C. II I Senior n LRSD School Checklist High Schools [S] Gracies 10-12 Central E.i-ri-n Hqa. J Pair Sem Sip..art Holl Bill Barnhouse ( IS 1500 Park_^72202 376 4751 t 5201 Oovid O^Dodd, 72210 - 2 ' P2205 - 661-9000 E 6609 McClellan^ Ruciolph Ho/a
dJ94 I 7_ Geyer Spr,n~gs. 72209~56T03U Porxv.e.v F.ne Aris Magnet J^njops Bobbs 250 f Sorrow, 7?20?~22 I T . 72204 . 225-6440 -r I T i I T Vocotioncl-Technicol Center [1] Grades 10-12 Metropoliton - Dr. Doyle DdlohLnty - /J^fScott'HomiltbATiib^Tf^^ I I r _ *^'9^ Schools [8] Grades T-3 -------Dexter Booth - 6~300'Hjnfeson Rd.."7'2~2b9 -365-54^26 Dunbar Monon Lccey -1100 Wright A* ve., 72206 375-5574
-------/ores^e2gl^s_.2ome^S. ^_|vergreen, 722T5~W3:339T --------Hend.erson - ^rody Grodberry - 401 Borrow Rd., 72205 - Watts . 10811 'Mob^I? w7 PO Box 187, Mobelvole, 72103 - 455-2413 225-3358 J_____I A j i I T I J___ I T t --------2n Magn2_- jf- V'Ctor Anderson - 1000~T Roosevelt Rd TwiZ Heights - On Jim Holey - 401 N, Pine, Southwest - Goll McLaughlin 72205 - 664-7073 - 372-3123 3301 Bryonh 72204 - 565-4416 I t T Elementory Sthoois [37] Grodes K-6 Badgett - Mary Golsto. Bole - Levonno Wilson n - 6900 Pecon Rood, 72206 - 490-1582 Boseline - Anno Totum . 3623 Baseline - 6501 W. 32nd, 72204 - 565-6621 278 ._____8col<er Arts Mcgnet - Wiiliom - 2016 B^ Rd., 72209 - 565-5589 h I Brody . Helen Th Carver er, 72206 - 376-3319 lomos - 7915 Morkhom. 722ns . 225-1815 Chicot - Otis Preslor IHOQ Chicot Rd. PQ Box 405, Mobelvole, 72103 - 568-2554 ^erdo2_Jocquol2e_Dedm
?77500 Hinkson Rd.. 72209 - SAS-nOR/ Do^_-_R obert Nelson - 6423 Soge:G^Ta7 72704-------- Poir Pork - Colherine Gill - 616 N. H Forest Pork - Virgmio franklin - Connie Aston - - 455-3110 arrison, 72205 - 666-0359 Ashley - 1600 (M. Tyler, 72207 - 666-5475 1701 S, Horrison, 72204 . 666-0343 ------------------------ 300 Pleosont Volley Dr., 72212 - 224-'73?n G3r^d_D^her2A^2tnmons - 3615 W. 25th 72204 . .n6A.9a<r~ Puibright - Mac Huhmcn Geyer Springs - Eleanor Cox Gibbs Mognet - Donng Dcyis IX - 5240 Mobelvole Pike, 72209 - 565-0184 Ish - Michoel Oliver ____j^g'^grson - Morgoret Gremillion 1115 W. 16th, 72202 - 372-0251 2 3001 5. Pulaski 2206 - 376-3629 I 417 __X 149 83 261 jl33' 244 ,421 I I 394 i 65- I ' 365 ' 67 '~420 j 2ti r 113 ! 472 I 440 I 8
563 I 285 i 261 ! I i 1.420 i 248 t 424 i51 461 2l 1 ItT. ! m i I5( 413 i (8 7 550 ! 513 ! 25 T I i 777 I sj-7. T 448 I 98 2-5-46 5?- 413 _59 I 3/? I 5<72. ' 3(3 ' SlZ I hlc : S37. 607 I 75 7 i n:," j ! 320 ! 298 5 ' 235 i /i7 I MV I A I I 538 : Q5' 303 ' 9B s^l AJA I -220 I 211 ! 490 i in 7 218 97 - 2600 N, McKinley, 72207 - 663-9472 ( ..5'.'^.5
,So_b2ge_Go^wm_^_4800_W. 26th, 72204~ j Mobelvale_Dorothy_F_au2kne^_ 940 l~7
b
f
j7^Q^----------------- I. _207, Mobelvole. 72103 455-2227 " 1--^'5Dermot^_^yn
^^e-2^0 TeT^rU^
Rd~ 72207 2757^ I _Me_adowc^ff_._j^\y^ns_2_5 Sherron 5r.. 7270?-565-0371 I _Mitchell - Donito Hu_dspefh_. 2410 Botte'ry. 72206~375.693 1------ Otter Creek - Pot Price - 16000 dtiel'cTelk Bobbie Goodwin 663-6397 A I T I S-fZ orrn lools - (confinutd on back) y. 72209 - 455.3320 541 I 35'0 I I SiZ 531 j _______I 465 j 2/7
/5 4 -----------LJAV275 ! ! 383 j Isy TiT: -^'3 ^37
I I I 231 IkI LRSD School Checklist JEIementory SchooU [37] Grodet K-6 (continued) [ Fuloiiki Hfighrs - Eddie Z^AcCoy 319 N. Pme, 77705 - 665-9469 Ri9huerr~l<^^ W. 19th. 72206 374^7448___ J Rockefeller - Anne Mongan - 700 E. 17th, 72206 - 374-1226 [ Romme Lionel Word - 3400 Romine Rd., 72204 225-8833 Stephens - Stan Strauss - 3700 W. 18th, 72204 663-8374 J Terry - Nancy Volsen 10800 Mora Lynn Dr., 7221 1 - 225-1215 [ W^efield - Lloyd Block - 75 Westminster, 72209 568-3874 Washington - Lonnie Sue Deon - 115 W. 27th, 72206 375-8275 Worsen - Dr. Diana Gloze - 7000 Volley Dr., 72209 - 565-1577 I Western Hills Margie Puckett - 4901 Western Hills, 72204 - 562-2247 Williams Magnet - Dr. Ed Jackson 7301 Evergreen, 72207 - 666-0346 J Wilson - Reine Price - 4015 Stannus Rd., 72204 - 565-0924 I Woodruff - Karen Buchanan - 3010 W. 7th, 72205 - 663-4149 S' tJ. 323 .47 ZaQ,^25Q__ 21. ' 320...U51.J__:7 4qn i I 5 J 'c* Totals *260 spaces left open for white students. T -ShO-U-SO-L 537 'ar4 iU 2- ' r472T'^^\ ! 6l00
340 3* M2 i 2&&. 195 1 328 1 /4V sir. Vi/ sijy. 343 ____ 54^ 409 1 I 178 ! 275 245 I Mt I Ziv I I 13563 ! no^ i I T I T I I T t I I I T I u i I t 4 I I T _l I T I I I T + I T I i _l_ I + X. + I T I iTO: Board of Directors FROM: THROUGH: SUBJECT: cc: October 20, 1988 James Jennings, Associate Superintendent - Desegregation Dr. George Cannon, Superintendent of Schools Enrollment Report - October 3, 1988 Executive StaffTOTAL ENROLLMENT Senior High Schools Central Fair Hall McClellan Parkview TOTAL HIGH SCHOOLS Junior High Schools Cloverdale Dunbar Forest Heights Henderson Mabelvale Mann Pulaski Heights Southwest TOTAL JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Elementary Schools Badgett Bale Baseline Brady Chicot Cloverdale Dodd Fair Park Forest Park Frankl in Ful bright Garland Geyer Springs Ish Jefferson Ki ng ENROLLMENT REPORT October 3, 1988 ENROLLMENT 26,543 2,070 920 1 ,268 1 ,191 847 6,296 712 741 770 954 581 882 694 734 6,068 279 414 400 447 560 446 414 341 423 442 598 299 239 197 488 94 BLACK 16,753 1,185 466 635 615 493 3,394 424 600 492 614 325 516 429 512 3,912 202 297 292 278 363 281 270 247 251 414 327 276 157 178 272 88 NONBLACK 9,790 885 454 633 576 354 2,902 288 141 278 340 256 366 265 222 2,156 77 117 108 169 197 165 144 94 172 28 271 23 82 19 216 6 % BLACK 63 57 51 50 52 58 54 60 81 64 64 56 59 62 70 64 72 72 73 64 65 63 66 72 59 74 55 92 66 90 56 94ENROLLMENT BLACK NONBLACK V /o BLACK Elementary Schools (Cont.) Mabelvale McDermott MeadowcTfff Mi tchel1 Otter Creek Pulaski Heights Rightsei 1 Rockefeller Romine Stephens Terry Wakefield Watson Western Hills Wilson Woodruff 586 506 456 261 361 326 241 300 472 233 522 501 465 332 412 221 373 298 312 220 207 226 196 255 360 227 307 316 297 213 289 163 213 208 144 41 154 100 45 45 112 6 215 185 168 119 123 58 63 59 69 84 58 70 81 85 76 97 59 63 65 64 70 74 TOTAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS 12,276 8,452 3,824 68 Elementary Magnet Schools Booker Carver Gibbs Williams 647 446 335 475 355 222 172 246 292 224 163 229 55 50 51 52 TOTAL ELEMENTARY MAGNETS 1 ,903 995 908 52 TOTAL ELEMENTARY 14,179 9,447 4,732 66SCHOOL <7^(70 e/c( 5/ ^^^53 7/i/c/^f// - /^(/'^.^ BLACK ^93 />^////A'n3 7^a0fiOf~7 7^(i3fl)./ ^b/9 b^(f/f9o ^fi7s<s0) ^/7 733 7/7 797 33^ 7C3 -77(^ 73^9 303 I 1 4- I t WHITE /.^3 /^/ /<i/ 7^ /(7> z^y ^g7 /'/7 ?>/a9 I I + OTHER ->/36 ^oS ^// -7/& -79^ /Z=2> 7333 -3'/C> 373 /(fi / -75Q ^,3'// '! I 1 MAX CAP 3^^ ^73 ^97 .3^7 3^3^ ~73V jV^> ^/3 ^o9 ^37 -333 -773^ 773>- c79^,7^^ I I 1 MIN Z BIX 39.3b 39.3b 39.3b 37.3b 39. 39.3b CURB Z BIX ^^./^> 7^-73 /^3. 75 ^7^0 39.3b 39.30 3730 3930 37.30 (T^.S'Y 77. 77 (/.^ 9<(. .-/?( ^7.77 77^/^ 37 39.0/ 357/ 97.^^ 73./9 73.33 1 i I... MAX Z BIX 7(7.37) 77.33) 77^3 77.^3 77.33 77.^3 7733 77.30 77.3(0 77.30 77.3b .^. oo 77.3(0 77.3b 77.3b 77. ^b 77. Sb 77.30 77.3b 7750 77.3(0 I IGRADE WHITE K 629 1 653 2 697 3 675 4 691 5 612 6 579 Ungr. 43 Total Elem: 4579 7 641 8 617 9 680 Ungr. 13 Total Jr: 1951 10 777 11 810 12 854 Ungr. 20 Total Sr: 2461 Total: 8991 Spec. Sch: 39 Grand Total: 9030 SUMMARY OF OCTOBEI^ 2, 1989 ENROLLMENT BLACK OIHER>> TOTAL XBLACK 1264 1450 1334 1407 1356 1302 1286 90 9489 1325 1422 1159 31 3937 1229 1104 916 15 3264 16,690 27 16,717 16 19 18 21 18 17 18 0 127 25 35 30 0 90 27 23 27 0 77 294 1 295 -'SUIMARY OF STUDENTS LISTED IN "CTHER CATEGORY: 1909 2122 2049 2103 2065 1931 1883 133 14,195 1991 2074 1869 44 5978 2033 1937 1797 35 5802 25,975 67 26,042 Spanish Asian/Pac. Is. 66 68 65 67 66 67 68 68 67 67 69 62 70 66 60 57 51 43 56 64 40 64 76 186 Eskimo/Amer. Indian 32 Other 11 ( LITILE ROCK SCHOOL DIS'lKICf October 2, 1989 I 1 i 1 .1 I 4 I '4 J 1 3 ( I I I J < ! J J I 1 1 I niack - B Miilc " W Other - 0 SaiCOL/CRADE CENTRAL Ungraded 10 11 12 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total FAIR Ungraded 10 .11 12 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total HALL Ungraded 10 11 12 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total MCCELLAN Ungraded 10 11 12 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total Mini-
DUCK on II31 lOl'Al. DL>\CK 200 270 250 720 0 720 13 145 119 120 397 3 400 1 169 154 221 551 16 567 141 145 153 439 3 442 396 343 321 1060 50 1110 7 211 156 133 507 10 517 8 213 245 163 629 3 632 271 207 156 634 13 647 8 12 13 33 0 33 0 3 1 3 7 0 7 0 4 2 6 12 1 13 2 2 4 8 , 0 8 604 66% 625 55% 584 55% 1813 50 1863 20 359 276 256 911 13 924 15 386 401 390 1192 20 1212 414 354 313 1081 16 1097 58% 100% 60% 35% 59% 57% 52% 56% 77% 56% 53% 55% ' 61% 53% 15% 52% 65% 58% 507. 59% 81% 59%V I I ' J V', LITTLE ROCK SO IDOL DISTKICT I J I > s I . i ! j I 3 1'1 J .1 .1 d 1 I October 2, 1989 Black - n Miitc W Ollier 0 i-MKoi.iMia'fr- SaiOOL/CRADE PARKVIEW Ungraded 10 11 12 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total Uiigradcil 10 .11 12 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total Ungraded 10 11 12 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total Ungraded 10 11 12 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total MUTE BLACK tniiEii lOIAL i: DLACK 122 122 110 354 5 359 138 153 143 434 14 448 10 270 51% 6 1 17 1 18 281 54% 254 805 20 825 56% 54% 70% 54% 1 II I I i I 1 I I ! 1 ( -I ( 1 J I ( 4 t a 1 hlnck - n Mil ic Other W 0 SaiOOL/CR/VDE (/^CLOVERDALE Ungraded 1 8 9 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total DUNBAR Ungraded 1 8 3 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total FOREST HEIGHTS Ungraded 7' 8 9 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total HENDERSON Ungraded 7 . 8 9 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total WllTE 58 93 100 251 251 49 35 36 120 120 3 78. 83 84 254 254 73 91 92 256 256 l.nTLE ROCK SaiCOL DISnUICT October 2, 1989 BLACK fZIllEU lOI'Al. 1. BLACK 126 218 126 470 128 ,154 172 454 454 12 175 197 154 538 538 247 240 193 680 680 5 3 2 10 10 0 2 0 2 2 0 3 8 5 16 16 6 7 1 20 20 . 189 314 228 731 731 177 191 208 576 576 15 256 294 243 808 808 326 338 292 956 956 69X 55% 64% 64X in. 81% 83% 137. 137. 80% 68% 67% 63% 67% 67% 76% 71% 66% 71% 71%' I .'.I LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIS'llUCT October 2, 1989 . ! Ill nek - 11 Wiite W .1 Other = 0 I-MI(Ol.llll-T<r SaiOOL/CnADE MI m
CLACK (ziiip:u lUI'AL CLACK I mabelvale Ungraded 9 12 0 21 57% I I I
I t 1 .1 I t ! 7 75 158 1 234 687. 3 67 114 1 182 63% 9 84 88 0 172 51% I I 1 . I 1 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total MANN Ungraded 7 8 9. Sub-Total Kindergarten Totol PULASKI HEIGHTS Ungraded 7 8 9 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total SOUTHWEST Ungraded 7 8 9 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total 235 yii 2 609 61% 235 372 2 609 61% 140 125 116 381 381 1 91 74 90 256 256 77 43 78 198 198 158 . 158 160 lili, 476 7 158 170 119 454 454 175 171 147 493 493 4 9 7 20 20 0 2 3 6 11 11 4 2 3 9 9 302 292 283 Z22 Z22 8 251 247 215 721 721 256 216 228 700 700 52% W/. 527. 54% 54% 88% 637. 69% 55% 63% 63% 68% 79% 64% 70% 70%V I i I ) I 1 I ! 'I -1 I I J 3 I I i Clack - 11 M111 e 17 Other 0 SaiOOL/CRADE BADGETT Ungraded 1 2 3 A 5 6 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total BALE Ungradcil 1 2 3 A 5 6 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total BASEL IUE Ungraded 1 2 3 A 5 6 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total BOOKER Ungraded 1 2 3 t, 5 6 Sub-Total, Kindergarten Total wiriT. . 1 6 9 6 10 7 13 52 5 57 4 8 17 15 15 7 11 77 11 88 19 15 14 15 14 9 86 14 100 33 45 40 42 41 42 243 32 280 UTILE ROCK SaiOOI. DIS"nilCr AllUUAL. REPORT OCTOBER-2,.1989* CLACK 3 29 30 30 18 21 34 165 15 180 5 50 49 42 41 36 40 263 29 292 47 41 45 39 35 30 237 45 282 47 45 45 48 57 47 289 36 325 t]ll(OI.I.UIKr uiiir
R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 1 0 5 0 5 1 2 0 0 1 2 6 1 7 3 1 1 0 0 0 5 0 5' TOl'Al. 4 35 39 36 28 23 47 217 20 221 9 58 67 60 56 44 51 345 40 385 67 58 59 54 50 41 329 60 389 38 91 86 90 98 89 542 68 610 7. CLACK 75% 83% 77% 33% 64% 75% 72% 76% 75% !(>% 56% 86% 73% 70% 73% 82% 78% 76% 73% 76% 70% 71% 76% 72% 70% 73% 72% 75% 72% 53% 49% 52% 53% 58% 53% 53% 53% 53%/ I I i. j 1 . i I I I I . I I I I .. J : . I Black B Uillc W Other 0 SaiCOL/CRADE BRADY Uiigrodcd 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total CARVER Uiigradcil 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sub-Total Klndergorten Total CHICOT Ungraded 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sub-Total Kindergarten To t n 1 CLOVERDALE Ungraded 1 2 3 4 5 . 6 Sub-Total Kindcrgartcii Total niitolj.MiJrr- wim
BLACK criiirai lUl'AI, 7
DLACK 2 h 25 23 27 7 10 6 52 48 38 37 40 39 0 1 2 2 0 2 1 3 74 75 63 64 49 50 75% 70% 64% 6a 58% 82% 78% 115 27 260 32 8 0 383 59 68% 54% 142 292 8 442 66% 33 45 48 49 51 52 33 39 43 40 45 45 1 0 1 5 0 0 67 84 92 94 96 97 49% 46% 47% 43% 47% 46% 278 30 308 12 32 27 29 23 21 13 157 31 188 15 24 24 19' 14 12 108 14 122 2U5 28 273 9 46 40 46 49 57 44 291 48 339 53 44 40 59 33 39 268 26 294 7 1 8 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 4 0 4 1 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 3 530 59 589 21 78 68 76 73 78 58 452 79 531 69 68 64 79 48 51 379 40 419. 46% 47% 46% 43% 59% 59% 61% 67% 73% 76% 64% 61% 64% 77% 65% 63% 75% 69% 76% 71% 65X 70XI- I 1 I I <) I. I i I .! 'J Black " H Mille - 17 Other - 0 SaiCOL/CRADE OOOD Ungraded 1 2 3 I, 5 6 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total FAIR PARK Ungraded 1 2 3 l> 5 6 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total FOREST PARK Ungraded 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total franklin Ungraded 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sub-Total_ Kindergarten Total wirn-: 16 20 11 29 26 16 113 20 138 18 18 9 11 12 12 80 12- 92 19 29 27 21 26 19 141 24 165 3 16 11 10 11 10 61 11 72 LITILE KOCK SQIOOI. DISTK [CT- ANNUAL REPORT OCTOBER 2, 1939 BLACK 30 30 38 38 50 47 233 20 253 50 32 35 37 24 35 213 27 240 28 41 42 38 28 30 207 16 223 64 43 50 54 48 43 302 62 364 laiiioi.i.Mi-j'rr- oiiir-B 2 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 . 0 1 1 1 0 4 0 4 0 2 2 1 3 2 10 2 12 lOl'AI, 48 50 49 67 77 63 354 40 394 63 50 44 48 36 47 293 39 332 48 70 70 60 55 49 352 40 392 67 61 63 65 62 55 373 75 448 . 7.' DLACK 63% 60% 78% 57% 65% 75% 66% 50% . 64% 74% 64% 80% 77% 67% 74% 73% 69% 72% 58% 59% 60% 63% 51% 61% 59% 40% 57% 96% 70% 79% 83% 77% 78% 31% 83% 81% I II ) DInck 11 Wilte - U Other 0 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT OCTOBER 2, 1989 i SdlOOL/CRADE 1711 m
BUCK 1 1 I FULBRIGHT Ungraded 1 2 3 h 5 6 5 39 35 32 35 30 30 4 50 55 43 30 44 47 J I i 1 1 1 '4 I i I .1 i I rmioiji-ii-j-rr UllIER 0 0 1 3 2 0 2 lUfAI. 9 97 91 03 75 82 79 Z' BLACK 44% 60% 61% 58% 51% 54% 59% Sub-Total Kindorgorten Total GARLAND Ungraded 1 2 3 6 5 6 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total GEYER SPRINGS Ungraded 1 2 3 t, 5 G Sub-Total Kindergarten Total GIBBS Ungraded 1 2 3 6 5 G Sub-Total Kindcrgarfcii Total 214 28 242 1 1 2 2 2 5 0 13 2 15 9 10 13 11 7 12 62 7 69 21 16 30 28 23 22 140 19 159 294 31 325 11 26 37 47 48 47 35 251 17 268 15 14 20 32 17 27 125 11 136 23 20 35 17 24 25 152 20 172 8 1 9 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 1 6 1 7 516 60 57% 52% 576 12 27 39 49 51 52 35 265 20 205 24 24 33 43 24 39 107 10 205 46 46 66 45 47 48 56 92% 96% 95% 96% 94% 90% 100% 95% D5X * " 3ao 94% 63% 57% 61% 74% 71% 69% 67% 61% 66% 50% 61% 53% 38% 51% 52% 298 . 40 51% 50% 338 51% I! I Clack - n Milte - U Other 0 l-l-IHOlJ.MIiWV- SaiOOL/CrtADE ISH Ungraded 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total JEFTERSeW Ungraded 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sub-Total Kindergarten Ml LIT. CLACK OIIIEU lOIAL 7. CLACK I I ! 'I .1 J I 1 I Total MABELVALE Ungraded 1 2 3 5 6 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total MCDERMOTT Ungraded 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sub-Total_ Kindergarten Total ,0 1 1 2 1 2 0 7 27 18 28 14 14 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 28 19 30 15 16 13 100% 96% 95% 93% 93% 88% 100% T 0 7 4 37 37 40 35 32 23 208 29 237 1 35 37 34 28 32 . 33 200 22 222 28 27 33 29 28 22 167 23 190 121 36 157 9 37 26 35 34 36 32 209 30 239 3 55 36 49 46 43 41 273 38 311 45 60 56 44 46 30 281 33 314 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 2 2 0 0 1 2 7 3 10 128 36 164 13 74 63 75 70 68 56 419 60 479 4 91 73 83 75 75 74 475 60 535 75 89 89 73 75 54 455 59 514 95% 100% V 1^0 96% 69% 50% 41% 47% 49% 5S% 57% 50% 50% 50% 75% 60% 49% 59% 61% 57% 55% 57% 63% 58% 60% 67% 63% 60% 61% 56% 62% 56% 61% IG1 Black - B Wilte - W Ollicc 0 SCIICOL/CRADE WHITE LITTLE ROCK RQIOOL DISTRICT ENItOUJ-irJ-fC- DUCK OIIICB roi'AL DLACK ,.1 .,.1 I . i EASTER SEALS Ungraded 1 2 3 It 5 6 11 4 0 15 27% 1 j 1 <1 .1 i ! 4 I ] 1 J I , I Sub-Total Kindergarten Total 11 4 0 15 27X ELIZA8ETH MITCHELL Ungraded 1 2 3 6 5 6 Sub-Total Klndergorten TotoL Ungraded 1 2 3 4 5 G Sub-Total Kindergarten Total Ungraded 1 2 3 6 5 6 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total 28 23 1 52 44S 28 23 1 52 44S I.
I I .1 J- ,1 i t i 1 J I .1 Clack - C Wille - U Ollier - 0 niiioij.MiJfr- SClICOL/CnADE ^,x1^STERN HILLS Ungraded 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sub-Total Kindecgoctcn Total WILLIAMS Uiigradcil 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total WILSON Ungraded 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sub-Total Kindcrgarlcn Total Ungraded 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sub-Total . Kindergarten Total Mim: CLACK 01 lira lOlAL 7.' CLACK 15 22 22 24 19 22 33 28 25 27 33 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 50 47 51 52 52 69% 55% 53% 53% 63% 58% 124 16 176 20 0 1 300 37 59% 54% 140 196 1 337 59Z 32 33 45 34 35 33 37 36 39 43 36 34 0 0 1 0 1 2 69 69 85 77 72 69 54% 52% 46% 56% 50% 49% 215 29 225 30 4 1 441 60 51% 50% 241 255 5 501 51Z 9 22 17 12 17 17 11 7 44 33 38 41 38 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 66 50 50 58 55 45 44% 67% 66% 76% 71% - 69% 76% 105 29 134 7 5 6 13 6 6 43 9 52 235 28 263 16 17 24 22. 29 19 127 10 137 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 4 0 4 340 57 397 23 23 31 35 37 25 174 . 19 193 69% 49% 66Z 70% 74% 77% 63% 78% 76% 73% 53% 71%I I I / i Ci I i ( I I . . I i . I I .'j . 1 .Lj I i I ,1 i I i Black II Wille - W Otlrcr - 0 BIIIOIJMI-J'fr- SaiOOL/CBADE wii'it
BLACK OIIILU roi'AL BLACK TERRY Ungraded 1 2 3 5 6 26 28 30 31 27 26 45 46 44 48 52 46 0 1 0 0 1 2 71 75 74 79 80 74 637. 61% 59% 617. 65% 627. Sub-Total Kindcrgarlcn Total WAKEFIELD Ungraded 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total WASHINGTON Ungraded 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sub-Total Kindcrgarlcn Total WATSON Ungraded 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sub-Total, Kindergarten Total 168 29 197 0 26 24 22 22 26 22 142 18 160 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 5 8 26 26 18 34 19 27 150 10 160 281 31 312 4 44 41 44 49 46 51 279 22 301 2 77 62 61 57 42 51 352 158 510 35 47 47 47 42 46 264 30 294 4 0 4 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 2 453 60 62% 527. 513 617, 4 70 65 67 72 73 73 424 40 464 4 77 62 61 57 43 51 355 164 100% 63% 63% 66% 68% 637. 70% 667. 55% (>57. 50% 100% 100% 1007. 100% . 98% 100% 99% 96% 519 987. 62 73 66 81 61 73 56% 64% 717. 58% 69% 63% 416 40 75% 456 64% iI I i I i i 1 I I --I J J I ! . I i I 'I .1 I I Black 11 Wiite - W Other - 0 SaiOOL/CRAOE TERRY Ungroded 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total WAKEFIELD Ungraded 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total WASHINGTON Ungraded 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sub-Total. Kindergarten Total WATSON Ungraded 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sub-Total, Kindergarten Total Wil LIT. 26 28 30 31 27 26 168 29 197 0 26 24 22 22 26 22 142 18 160 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 5 8 26 26 18 34 19 27 150 10 160 HUCK 45 46 44 48 52 46 281 31 312 4 44 41 44 49 46 51 279 22 301 2 77 62 61 57 42 51 352 158 510 35 47 47 47. 42 46 264 30 DlltOIJ MliKr- 01 lira 0 1 0 0 1 2 4 0 4 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 2 TOl'AL 71 75 74 79 80 74 453 60 513 4 70 65 67 72 73 73 424 40 464 4 77 62 61 57 43 51 355 164 519 62 73 66 81 61 73 ZTT 40 456 i: BLACK 63% 61% 59% 61% 65% 62% 62% 52% 61% 100% 63% 63% 66% 68% 63% 70% 66% 55% 65X 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 100% 99% 96% ^7^ 987. 56% 64% 71% 58% 69% 63% 63% 75% 64%I I j i I I j ,1 J J ( 1 :] j I Black 11 MU to - W Olhr.c - 0 i-jiuoiJMiJ-f r SaiCOL/CHADE HEADOWCLIFF Ungroded 1 2 3 5 6 Sub-Total Kindorgorten Total MITCHELL Ungraded 1 2 3 A 5 6 Sub-Total Kindergarten Total OTTER CREEK Ungraded 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sub-Total Kindergactcii Total PULASKI HEIGHTS Ungraded 1 2 3 6 5 6 Sub-Total - Kindergarten Total Mirn-
DLACK omni WrAL Z DLACK 24 30 20 22 14 22 50 36 46 45 32 30 0 1 0 0 0 1 74 67 66 67 46 53 68% 54% 70% 67% 70% 57% 132 30 162 0 3 4 4 4 1 0 16 3 19 27 27 24 22 22 25 147 25 172 20 13 8 9 10 9 69 18 37 239 29 263 8 37 35 24 29 19 35 187 33 220 23 32 25 24 25 26 155 15 170 28 30 34 32 35 38 197 21 218 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 2 373 59 432 8 40 39 28 33 20 35 203 36 64% 49% 62 100% 93% 90% 86% 88 I A> 95% 100% 92% 92% 239 92% 50 59 49 46 47 51 46 54% 51% .52% 53 512 302 40 342 48 44 43 41 45 47 268 39 307 51% 38% 502 58S 68% 79% 78% 78% 81% 74% 54% 712Woodruff Elementary Western Hills Elementary Geyer Springs Elementary Cloverdale Elementary Cloverdale Junior High Forest Heights Junior High 186 339 201 389 764 772 183 336 207 391 749 765 209 355 255 464 750 780 193 337 205 419 731 808 209 328 237 422 750 780 104 295 221 316 137 316 226 357 209 325 236 424 221 332 239 446 712 770 245 328 235 420 750 780 252 308 221 418 245 328 235 420 229 268 287 258 325 305 218 354 328 235 420 314 235 408 678 862 328 235 394 657 843 346 691 315 222 572 840 769 225 200 500 747 725 SCHOOL Central Fair Hall McClellan Parkview Cloverdale Jr. Dunbar Forest Heights Henderson Mabelvale Mann Pulaski Heights Jr. Southwest Badgett Bale Easeline Bocker Brady Carver Chicot Cloverdale Dodd Fair Park Forest Park Franklin Fulbright Garland Geyer Springs Gibbs Ish Jefferson Mabelvale McDermott Meadowcliff Mitchell Otter Creek Pulaski Heights Rightsell Rockefeller Romine Stephens Terry Wakefield Washington Watson Western Hills Williams Wilson Woodruff BUILDING CAPACITIES CAPACITY 2050 936 1220 1200 846 750 812 780 960 600 700 754 257 415 390 656 491 613 558 464 386 383 403 484 587 300 255 332 200 513 562 562 481 273 378 378 240 320 537 260 537 517 866 537 355 517 428 209 /fINCENTIVE SCHOOL CAPACITIES (Question 14.) What is the present capacity of each incentive school? According to the LRSD Settlement Plan, Vol II, Pp. 26 and 28 (attached.) the total capacity of the incentive schools is 3800 seats, figuring eight incentive schools (Franklin, Garland, Ish, Mitchell, Rightsell, Rockefeller, Stephens and Washington) and using the capacity figures of those schools as of January 31, 1589, the date the plan was written. However, according to the changes recently approved by the court which allowed Washington to remain the magnet school it. had become under the Tri-Di strict Plan, there will only be seven incentive schools next year: Mitchell, Rightsell, Rockefeller and Stephens. Franklin, Garland, Ish, LRSD capacity figures for 1990-91 indicate that the total capacity of these seven ince.ntive schools is 2084. We don't knov/ how LRSD arrived at these capacity figures (i.e., number of classrooms and number of children per classroom.) School 1990/91 Capacity Frankli n Garland Ish Mi tchel1 Rightsei 1 Rockefeller Stephens 484 300 200 280 (273) 240 320 260 Toral 2084I School Capacity Black Otter Creek Nor-3lack Total 33 3 % Black 133 Pulaski Heights 162 345 5 3% 323 159 Terry 119 273 57% 537 260 Wakefield 224 484 54% 472 215 Watson 184 399 54% 472 227 Western Hill 157 384 59% 328 165 Wilson 140 305 54% 409 223 170 Totals 393 57% 9,501 Incentive Schools There will be with the number eight incentive Schools which are listed below of classrooms in each as well each at twenty-five students as the capacity of School Franklin Garland Ish Mitchell Rightsell Rockefeller Stephens Washington Totals per classroom: Classes
Capacity at 25 28 16 11 14 12 16 13 42 136 700 400 275 350 300 400 325 1050 3800 /iWviid y is te V / -S4a) K/.fkssii i?2 a - I 26 I Grace Maximum Numbe el 1 number of Students Per Class Kindergarten LAveragej Maximum Number- of Students Firs 20 Any Class in 'Third Fourth-Sixth 23 20 Tte total 25 25 9z501. Tte capacity of t),, a twenty-two 28 ilementary Academies is Incentive School of 20 to 1 X . There -s will have however, 'ay be more than a maximum pupil/teach ar ratio there will be a certified 20 students per classroom. Poss.bry a second teacher in those aide in each class Incenti ve School classes. and The total exceeds the The and the is 3,800 The ar 25 students capacity of the nonmagnet- el par class. projected overall -ementary capacity of enrollment racial composition of space available for upon the number of LRSD (12,350) by 1,256 seats. (13,61S) the ^^ruitment at Elementary Academies Interdistrict students who Incen expected Schools. The initial ive Schools is expected to be that at least 400 Interdistri hlack Incer ~O- Schools. ive and Interdis Acade.miss: those schools depend enroll racial in Incentive composition predominantly black. LRSD The chart below shows th- students will and of the It is attend tict School a impact of black enrollment upon the ElementaryTO: FROM: THROUGH: SUBJECT: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS April 2, 1990 Office of the Metropolitan Supervisor James Jennings, Associate Superintendent for Desegregation Monitoring and Program Development Dr. Ruth Steele, Superintendent of Schools Dr. Herb Cleek, Deputy Superintendent of Schools Attendance Zone Report Introduction The following report is submitted in compliance with the March 5 court order to review all attendance zones and make projections for the 1995-96 school year. Three sets of data are examined in this report: (1) School enrollment figures (2) Census tract data (3) Zone block (geocode) counts These sources of data should not be viewed in isolation of each other. Population trends are confirmed when different sources of data, over a period of years, suggest or establish the same pattern of growth or decline. Enrollment Comparisons and Census Projections The simplest way to project for the future is to examine any trends that have occurred in the past. In using past trends to project for the future, allowances must be made for any anticipation of deviations from the trends. In regard to projecting school enrollment, the method of studying past trends to project for the future is quite reliable. The Little Rock School District has used past school enrollments to project school enrollments for the future.Although school enrol Imepts have been used in the past for projection purposes, the task of projecting the numbers of students in each attendance zone for tie 1995-96 school year cannot be done by using past school enrollments. The Little Rock School District has used four different assignments plans over the past four years. pairing plan. The 1986-87 school year was the last year for an elementary Primary schools on the west side of the District were paired with intermediate schools on the east side of the District. In 1987-88, the year of annexation, the Little Rock School District used a new attendance zone plan and converted all primary or intermediate schools to K-6. Students were manditorily assigned to schools, based on the new attendance zones, and then allowed to transfer if desegregation requirements could be upheld. trict referred to this plan as "controlled choice. The disIt In 1988-89, the attendance zones and "controlled choice zones" (zones A & B) were abolished and all students could select any school in the district. The present school year, 1989-90, marks the return to the use of an elementary attendance zone plan. The plan applies only to kindergarten, rising, and new students and grandfathers all remaining students. The 1989-90 attendance zone plan is extremely different from the 1987-88 attendanze zone plan. As a result of all of these factors, the analysis of school enrollment trends prior to the 1989-90 school year cannot be used to project attendance zone trends in the future. The 1989-90 school year will serve as the baseline year for the study of school enrollment trends. Attendance zone projections can also be determined by analyzing census tract Although the boundaries of the census tracts are different from information. the boundaries of the school attendance zones, census tract projections are still useful in identifying trends in various geographic areas. In 1988, the Little Rock School District employed The Grier Partnership bn collaboration with Stanton Leggett and Associates) to conduct a demographic study. The demographers reviewed census tract projections from Metroplan and UALR. The next section of this report will examine the results of the demographic study. An attempt will also be made to compare 1988-89 and 1989-90 attendance zone counts. Each student in the Little Rock School District is assigned a geocode or zone block number based on his/her home address. of several contiguous zone blocks or geocodes. Attendance zones consist zone includes one or more satellite areas. In some cases, an attendance A satellite is an attendance area that is detached from the immediate school vicinity and is usually a considerable The 1988-89 school year was the first year able distance from the school site. for the District to load and maintain a computerized file of all zone block counts. As a result, this comparison will be based on one year of experience. Demographic Study As stated earlier, the demographers reviewed census tract projections from UALR and Metroplan. It should be noted that census tracts do not match the attendance zones used by the Little Rock School District. for geocodes, or zone blocks, and not for census tracts. School data are recorded According to the demographer, "about 83 percent of all geocodes fall entirely within a single census tract. II Although the geocodes are not fully compatible with the census tracts, an examination of census data should yield valuable information concerning long-term trends.The Grier report notes that "change in the schools appears to be moving in concert with changes in the city as a whole -- population losses in close-in older neighborhoods, growth in certain outlying areas. II In terms of specific areas, between 1980 and 1986, Metroplan estimated that there were losses in almost every census tract on the eastern side of the city, in the tracts close to downtown, and in those on the near west side but east of University Avenue. These areas are represented by tracts 1-20 (with the exception of Tract 16) on Attachment A ("Changes in Total Population By Census Tract, Little Rock, Arkansas, 1980 to 2010"). zones: These tracts cover the following school attendance -- Rightsell -- Rockefeller -- Mitchell -- Badgett -- Washington -- Stephens -- Garland -- Ish -- Franklin -- Forest Park satellite -- Terry satellite -- McDermott satellite -- Oefferson satellite -- Brady satellite -- Otter Creek satellite -- Meadowcliff satellite The census tract table indicates that almost half of the tracts in this area will experience growth during the period of 1980-2010. However, it is impossible to determine how much of the projected growth will occur in a specific census tract by 1995-96. ience a decline during the 30-year period. The remainder of the tracts in this area will exper- The same problem related to determining when and what degree of growth will occur also applies to projecting 1osses. The overall effect of gains and losses in this area will result in a net increase of 846 persons over a 30-year period. A net increase in total population of 846 persons over a 30-year period will probably have no effect on the boundaries of the attendance zones in 1995-96. Most of the growth during the 30-year period is expected to occur in tracts 41.04, 42.03, and 42.04. the Little Rock School District. These tracts are located on the western boundary of Creek areas. Tract 41.04 covers the Mabelvale and Otter Tracts 42.03 and 42.04 cover portions of the Fulbright, Terry, Wilson, and Dodd attendance zones. The growth in tract 42.03 should also affect the Forest Park satellite zone located on the northwest tip of the di strict. Again, there is not enough data to predict how the projected growth will affect these attendance zones in 1995-96.Although the census data provides useful information for identifying population trends, it will be necessary to wait for the 1990 census results in order to make specific projections. Under normal circumstances, long-term projections are based on data collected over a 3-5 year period. It is difficult to recognize an ongoing pattern or trend by merely comparing two separate years. Since census information is collected every 10 years, it will be necessary to rely on a comparison of 1980 and 1990 census results. The Little Rock School District Student Assignment Office will begin immediately to develop a plan for recording student address information by census tracts This will enhance the District's ability to correlate long-term census projections with student information gathered annually. Geocode Comparisons The comparison of zone block (geocode) student counts is another method that can be used to identify student population trends. Attachment B compares 1988-89 and 1989-90 zone block and attendance zone counts. These counts only reflect students enrolled in the Little Rock School District. It was noted earlier that the census data indicates a population decline in the area east of University. the same trend. The comparison of zone block information indicates 1988-89 to 1989-90. mately 30 students. Most of the incentive schools experiences small gains from However, the Garland attendance zone declined by approxi- The area east of University Avenue experienced a net gain of 149 students. As noted earlier with the census data, the gain of 149 students in the area east of University Avenue is the net result of gains and losses in this area. Although the comparison of geocode counts is a viable method for identifying enrollment trends and making projections, at least three years of geocode data should be used to ensure reliability. The Little Rock School District did not have the capability to maintain accurate geocode information prior to the 1988-89 school year. Therefore, it is recommended that the District be allowed to collect the 1990-91 geocode information before preparing the 1995-96 attendance zone projections. Attendance Zones and Building Capacity The Little Rock School District currently uses 90% of its total non-magnet elementary capacity (See Attachment C). The District has stated on several occasions that the elementary building capacity, particularly in central and east Little Rock, needs to be increased. The District's capacity problem is compounded by the fact that the interdistrict magnet program reduced the number of elementary seats available to Little Rock students. Also, programs such as PAL (Program for Accelerated Learning) and Gifted/Talented have caused a reduction in school capacity.Attachment C shows the number of students who reside in each attendance zone. All of these students are currently enrolled in a non-magnet (area) school even though the school may not be their attendance zone school. (NOTE: Attachment C DOES NOT show the number of students currently enrolled in each attendance zone school. It shows the number of students who live in the attendance zone even though they may attend a non-attendance zone school. The District fully understands the reason for the court's concern about attendance zone projections and adjustments for the 1995-96 school year. However, the elementary capacity must be addressed before attendance zones are adjusted. Otherwise, any adjustments will simply shift the current capacity problem from one school to another school. In regard to the incentive schools, the District has proposed to expand Rightsell and Mitchell (if a new school site in the vicinity cannot be located) close Ish, Stephens, and Garland, and build a new school at the Old King School site. The plan to close and rebuild incentive schools should be finalized before any attendance zones are adjusted. Recommendations As already stated in this report, several factors preclude the District from being able to make reliable attendance zone projections at this time. In light of these factors, the District respectfully recommends the following: 1. The District will prepare attendance zone projections after the release of the 1990 census results. 2. 3. 4. 5. The District will begin immediately to develop a plan for recording student address information by census tracts. Attendance zone projections will also be based on any trends identified by comparing 1990-91 kindergarten and first grade enrollment figures. Both of these grade level assignments are based on the new attendance zones. The District will be allowed to collect the 1990-91 geocode information in order to be able to compare 1988-89 and 1990-91 geocode counts. The plan to close and rebuild incentive schools should be finalized before attendance zones are adjusted.ATTACHMENT A TABLE 5 Census Tract 123 4 5 678 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20.01 20.02 21.01 21.02 22.01 22.03 22.04 22.05 23 24.01 24.02 40.01 41.03 41.04 41.05 41.06 41.07 41.08 42.03 42.04 I blw CHANGES IN TOTAL POPULATION BY CENSUS TRACT* LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 1980 TO 2010 1980 Total Tract 2010 Total Tract Change 1980-2010 No. Pct 860 4,491 2,726 1,508 4,904 3,956 2,969 773 806 4,391 4,831 2,675 5,262 3,417 8,175 5,258 867 6,406 5,029 5,748 5,568 8,468 4,095 5,196 4,935 7,938 6,940 920 11,100 7,378 5,539 3,813 1,354 6,211 6,660 4,058 6,361 8,260 6,614 1,600 4,000 3,200 1,000 5,200 4,000 3,200 800 800 4,600 4,600 2,200 4,800 3,800 10,000 5,100 850 5,900 4,500 5,700 5,600 8,000 6,000 5,600 5,300 8,800 9,500 950 16,800 13,800 4,500 5,500 6,800 12,200 8,400 4,900 7,200 38,900 22,000 740 (491) 474 (508) 296 44 231 27 (6) 209 (231) (475) (462) 383 1,825 (158) (17) (506) (529) (48) 32 (468) 1,905 404 365 862 2,560 30 5,700 6,422 (1,039) 1,687 5,446 5,989 1,740 842 839 30,640 15,386 86.0% -10.9% 17.4% -33.7% 6.0% 1.1% 7.8% 3.5% -0.7% 4.8% -4.8% -17.8% -8.8% 11.2% 22.3% -3.0% -2.0% -7.9% -10.5% -0.8% 0.6% -5.5% 46.5% 7.8% 7.4% 10.9% 36.9% 3.3% 51.4% 87.0% -18.8% 44.2% 402.2% 96.4% 26.1% 20.7% 13.2% 370.9% 232.6% 186,460 266,600 80,140 43.0% *Data for both 1980 and 2010 are for the entire census tract. In some cases, the tract boundaries currently extend beyond the city limits into unincorporated portions of Pulaski County. SOURCES: 1980 data from 1980 Census of Population. 2010 projections from Metroplan, Planning Support Document, ATTACHMENT B LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ZONE BLOCK COMPARISON ZONE BLOCKS FOR BADGETT PAGE 1 1988-89 1989-90 3201 19 10 -9 3250 68 + 11 3251 23 -1 3253 26 6 3255 4 3 -1 3640 19 + 15 TOTAL 133 142 +9 4 ZONE BLOCKS FOR BALE 1988-89 1989-90 o: 21 56 42 -14 0531 33 40 0532 58 -3 0534 29 -4 1921 11 20 +9 1922 28 31 +3 1923 27 +2 1924 57 64 +7 1925 10 8 TOTAL 307 322ZONE BLOCKS FOR BASELINE PAGE 2 3401 3406 3410 3415 3420 3425 3430 3620 3625 cr 365 TOTAL 19SS-S9 1989-90 32 39 +7 107 89 -18 28 33 33 31 21 19 24 17 -7 16 14 34 +9 23 19 -4 11 6 5^ 320 301 -19ZONE BLOCKS FOR BRADY PAGE 3 0540 0591 0592 0593 1010 1020 1311 1321 1331 1332 1630 1712 1713 1716 1910 TOTAL 1988-89 1989-90 6 11 86 67 -19 17 13 -4 0 7 9 17 14 -3 32 38 +6 21 20 0 51 10 42 21 357 0 36 6 35 48 15 31 19 344 -21 + 16 +6 + 10 -3 -11 -3 -13ZONE BLOCKS FOR CHICOT PAGE 4 3435 3440 3445 3464 5408 7401 7405 7410 7415 7425 7467 7468 7469 7470 7471 7474 7476 7479 7480 TOTAL 1988-89 1989-90 10 13 +3 6 0 50 29 79 21 C" 32 9 24 7 18 17 30 32 495 13 +7 0 0 34 36 79 27 54 30 16 27 21 9 14 15 0 23 488 -16 +7 0 +6 -3 +7 -3 +7 -3 -15 -9 -7ZONE BLOCKS FOR CLOVERDALE ELEM PAGE 5 3601 3605 3615 3630 3645 3646 3647 3648 3649 3650 3651 7310 7375 7387 TOTAL 1988-89 1989-90 19 IS 4 12 10 19 26 31 44 15 30 38 316 26 12 14 0 21 13 0 31 33 60 28 21 11 87 357 + 1 -7 -4 -4 +9 +3 -19 + 16 +3 +6 -19 +49 +41ZONE BLOCKS FOR DODD PAGE 6 1722 1728 4001 4010 4017 4020 4025 4046 4049 4052 4053 5467 TOTAL 1988-89 1989-90 61 51 -10 39 er er + 16 17 16 -1 79 73 -6 4 3 -1 20 54 23 35 18 0 3 353 20 46 18 37 0 0 341 0 -8 +4 0 -3 -12ZONE BLOCKS FOR FAIR PARK PAGE 7 1988-89 1989-90 0511 13 +4 9 0512 8 7 -1 0513 68 60 -8 0554 54 51 -3 0920 63 crcr -8 1110 33 31 nil 32 48 + 16 1120 8 6 1121 6 0 6 TOTAL 271 -10 281 . ZONE BLOCKS FOR FOREST PARK 1988-89 1989-90 0411 4 0 -4 0412 12 -12 0 0413 3 0420 14 15 0553 92 76 -16 0556 65 57 -8 0811 10 -1 0821 39 41 0910 54 47 -7 6110 27 -28 K 9 + 1 6125 0 0 0 TOTAL 350 275 -75ZONE BLOCKS FOR FRANKLIN PAGE S 0522 0523 0524 0525 0526 0527 0528 0529 0530 0538 0539 0571 0575 TOTAL 1988-89 1989-90 57 63 +6 60 50 -10 65 70 87 84 -3 35 33 30 35 30 . 71 36 20 54 51 631 21 -9 32 -3 26 -4 59 47 24 53 48 610 -12 + 11 +4 -1 -3 -21ZONE BLOCKS FOR FULBRIGHT PAGE 9 1210 1405 1410 1440 1714 1810 1811 1812 6115 6120 6122 6171 6188 TOTAL 1988-89 1989-90 28 23 -5 0 21 97 89 -8 19 21 104 108 +4 58 32 65 24 12 31 497 66 39 66 18 0 13 30 519 +8 + 1 -6 0 + 1 -1ZONE BLOCKS FOR GARLAND PAGE 10 1988-89 1989-90 0581 42 44 0582 110 57 -53 0584 95 80 -15 0585 50 73 +23 0586 10 21 + 11 0587 42 44 TOTAL 349 319 -30 ZONE BLOCKS FOR GEYER SPRINGS 1988-89 1989-90 3405 71 74 +3 4401 4405 15 20 4410 38 32 -6 4415 17 17 0 4420 21 26 4429 29 17 -12 4430 10 18 +8 TOTAL 226ZONE BLOCKS FOR ISH PAGE 11 0473 0476 0477 0479 0480 0485 TOTAL 19SS-89 1989-90 44 42 23 35 43 CT IT 242 ZONE BLOCKS FOR JEFFERSON 1988-89 49 45 30 30 41 57 rCT' 1989-90 c? +3 +7 + 10 1220 6 6 0 1230 12 6 6 1231 7 11 +4 1240 157 165 +8 0431 38 37 -1 0432 53 72 + 19 0433 38 30 -8 0434 26 28 0435 19 18 -1 0438 45 49 +4 TOTAL 401 422ZONE BLOCKS FOR MABELVALE ELEM PAGE 12 3635 3654 3655 5401 5402 5405 5406 5407 5415 5452 545S 5462 5465 7325 7383 7338 7390 7420 7475 TOTAL 1938-89 1939-90 34 64 30 16 14 28 7 13 . 18 19 15 1 13 31 0 28 27 437 48 67 31 12 23 30 6 14 15 18 21 0 12 35 21 67 34 40 516 + 14 +3 + 1 -4 +9 -1 + 1 -1 +6 -1 -1 +4 0 + 10 +6 + 13 +79ZONE BLOCKS FOR MCDERMOTT PAGE 13 0552 0561 0562 1310 1312 1420 1421 1430 1520 1531 1541 1542 TOTAL 1988-39 1989-90 64 62 63 78 + 15 88 84 -4 24 19 0 0 0 33 39 107 29 10 - 21 0 478 ZONE BLOCKS FOR MEADOWCLIFF 1988-89 -8 40 20 19 19 0 488 1989-90 + 1 + 15 -9 +9 -3 0 + 10 0533 72 65 -7 0535 64 75 + 11 0536 14 11 -3 0537 62 70 +8 2110 94 76 -18 2120 62 76 + 14 4015 16 11 __CT 4048 29 40 + 11 TOTAL 413 424 + 11ZONE BLOCKS FOR MITCHELL PAGE 14 0442 0443 0444 0445 0446 0451 0452 0453 0457 0458 0459 TOTAL 1988-89 1989-90 28 30 itr 18 42 26 46 42 36 340 ZONE BLOCKS FOR OTTER CREEK 1988-89 44 21 28 23 12 31 36 49 48 36 350 1989-90 + 16 -8 -4 +6 -13 -11 + 10 +3 +6 0 + 10 0471 44 47 +3 0472 49 69 0475 68 75 +7 5460 29 19 -10 5470 1 3 5472 0 0 0 5475 40 46 +6 5476 43 45 5477 26 46 5478 5 9 +45492 7 15 TOTAL 312 374 PAGE 14B +S +62ZONE BLOCKS FOR PULASKI HGHTS ELEM PAGE 15 1988-89 1989-90 0610 19 21 +3 0620 24 16 -8 0630 3 0640 7 14 0641 cr 14 +9 0651 7 12 0660 77 96 + 19 0710 30 31 + 1 TOTAL 174 207 +33 ZONE BLOCKS FOR RIGHTSELL 1988-89 1989-90 0439 0 73 +73 0448 0 70 +70 0449 55 61 +6 0450 59 58 -1 0454 0 0464 31 44 + 13 TOTAL 165 306 + 141ZONE BLOCKS FOR ROCKEFELLER PAGE 16 198S-89 1989-90 0232 1 7 0 0440 59 50 -9 0456 44 48 +4 0460 54 41 -13 0461 63 67 +4 0462 53 54 + 1 0463 19 31 TOTAL 299 . 298 -1 ZONE BLOCKS FOR ROMINE 1988-89 1989-90 1715 67 77 + 10 1717 102 SO 1721 93 81 -12 1723 30 1724 46 53 +7 1727 98 98 0 TOTAL 436 421 -15ZONE BLOCKS FOR STEPHENS PAGE 17 0441 0572 0573 0574 0583 TOTAL 1988-89 1989-90 34 97 37 58 81 307 ZONE BLOCKS FOR TERRY 1988-89 38 82 45 67 81 313 1989-90 +4 -15 +8 +9 0 +6 0436 70 54 -16 0437 64 56 -8 0563 78 68 -10 1510 21 23 1511 75 68 -7 1512 27 33 +6 1515 39 -17 1530 8 13 1532 21 34 1550 53 42 -11 1610 7 8 + 1 1620 11 12 + 1 3330 4 0 -4 TOTAL 478 433 -45ZONE BLOCKS FOR WAKEFIELD PAGE 18 7201 7210 7220 7230 7235 7240 7245 7250 7276 7277 7279 7280 7281 TOTAL 1988-89 1989-90 73 71 9 10 35 39 21 .. 34 37 11 26 10 14 344 18 10 37 97 27 31 30 24 31 11 9 418 +9 0 +58 +6 -3 -7 + 13 -4 +6 + 1 +74ZONE BLOCKS FOR WASHINGTON PAGE 19 0111 0112 0121 0122 0123 0124 0125 0126 0127 0210 0220 0240 0301 0455 0474 0478 0481 0482 0483 0484 TOTAL 198S-S9 1989-90 14 16 16 IB 0 29 +7 39 33 -6 79 17 62 14 99 0 12 71 27 39 61 78 58 35 790 0 48 93 120 24 0 51 27 43 74 103 73 38 867 -24 -17 -14 +8 -6 + 120 -1 -12 -20 0 +4 + 13 + 15 +3 +77ZONE BLOCKS FOR WATSON PAGE 20 1988-89 1989-90 7301 48 59 + 11 7305 28 31 +3 7315 76 61 -15 7330 18 11 -7 7377 38 62 7378 19 19 0 7381 0 7382 44 + 11 7384 I er 26 + 1 7385 20 24 +4 7490 9 6 -3 7495 IS 13 343 389 +46 V^ONE BLOCKS FOR WESTERN HILLS 1988-89 1989-90 1725 34 29 er 1726 33 41 +8 1822 94 95 + 1 2010 46 41 5 2015 51 68 + 17 2020 37 42 TOTAL 295 316 +21ZONE BLOCKS FOR WILSON PAGE 21 1988-89 1989-90 1711 23 19 -4 1813 53 53 0 1821 72 79 +7 1823 89 109 1824 46 54 +8 3301 28 38 + 10 3312 51 36 -15 3316 18 19 + 1 TOTAL 380 407 +27 ^ZONE BLOCKS FOR WOODRUFF 1988-89 1989-90 0650 13 10 -3 0670 68 101 +33 0662 23 26 +3 TOTAL 104 137 +33SCHOOL BADGETT BALE BASELINE BRADY CHICOT CLOVERDALE DODD FAIR PARK FOREST PARK FRANKLIN FULBRIGHT GARLAND GEYER SPRINGS ISH OEFFERSON MABELVALE MCDERMOTT MEADOWCLIFF MITCHELL OTTER CREEK PULASKI HEIGHTS RIGHTSELL ATTACHMENT C LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT TOTAL 142 322 301 344 488 357 341 271 275 610 519 319 226 252 422 516 488 424 350 374 207 306 K-6 CAPACITY 241 399 384 491 483 424 353 351 431 556 607 300 236 200 491 533 562 454 280 378 328 260 CAPACITY % 59% 81% 78% 70% 101% 84% 97% 77% 64% 109% 86% 106% 96% 126% 86% 97% 87% 93% 135% 99% 63% 118%PAGE 2 SCHOOL TOTAL CAPACITY CAPACITY % ROCKEFELLER 298 420 71% ROMINE 421 492 86% STEPHENS 313 260 120% TERRY 433 537 81% WAKEFIELD 418 469 89% WASHINGTON 867 820 106% WATSON 389 469 83% WESTERN HILLS 316 325 97% WILSON 407 398 102% WOODRUFF 137 209 66% TOTAL 11,851 13,141 90% (NOTE
These capacity figures do not reflect the proposed capacity changes in the incentive schools for the 1991-92 school year.)SCHOOL BADGETT BALE BASELINE BRADY CHICOT CLOVERDALE DODD FAIR PARK FOREST PARK FRANKLIN FULBRIGHT GARLAND GEYER SPRINGS ISH OEFFERSON MABELVALE MCDERMOTT MEADOWCLIFF MITCHELL OTTER CREEK PULASKI HEIGHTS RIGHTSELL ATTACHMENT C LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT TOTAL 142 322 301 344 488 357 341 271 275 610 519 319 226 252 422 516 488 424 350 374 207 306 K-6 CAPACITY 241 399 384 491 483 424 353 351 431 556 607 300 236 200 491 533 562 454 280 378 328 260 CAPACITY % 59% 81% 78% 70% 101% 84% 97% 77% 64% 109% 86% 106% 96% 126% 86% 97% 87% 93% 135% 99% 63% 118%PAGE 2 SCHOOL TOTAL CAPACITY CAPACITY % ROCKEFELLER 298 420 71% ROMINE 421 492 86% STEPHENS 313 260 120% TERRY 433 537 81% WAKEFIELD 418 469 89% WASHINGTON 867 820 106% WATSON 389 469 83% WESTERN HILLS 316 325 97% WILSON 407 398 102% WOODRUFF 137 209 66% TOTAL 11,851 13,141 90% (NOTE: These capacity figures do not reflect the proposed capacity changes in the incentive schools for the 1991-92 school year.)LRSD enrollment - Oct. 1990 10-12-90 Sr. high [ Non-black 1990 Black %Black 1989 %Black Central Fair Hall McClellan Parkview Total Jr. hiah Cloverdale Junior Dunbar Forest Heights Henderson Mabelvale Junior Mann Pulaski Heights Southwest Total Elementarv Badgett Bale Baseline Booker Brady Carver Chicot Cloverdale Dodd Fair Park Forest Park Franklin Fulbright Garland Geyer Springs Gibbs Ish Jefferson Mabelvale McDermott Meadowcliff Mitchell Otter Creek Pulaski Heights Rightsell Rockefeller Romine Stephens Terry Wakefield j Washington i Watson 652 364 528 393 369 2,306 229 240 242 230 216 371 268 163 1,959 977 515 703 630 447 3,272 535 423 530 . 672 404 515 454 492 4,025 1 Western Hills ! Williams ' Wilson I Woodruff ' Total I Grand total 56 73 98 268 126 276 182 100 137 66 182 68 266 29 56 146 4 232 238 201 157 24 179 114 2 76 69 12 233 176 324 171 135 224 120 66 4,886 166 302 272 346 330 327 362 289 194 279 205 343 293 211 145 187 142 237 321 323 287 183 180 211 191 195 323 190 289 326 438 347 204 281 298 120 9,337 2^ 60 59 57 62 55 58 60 56 52 59 - 54 57 70 64 69 75 65 58 63 75 67 64 79 67 71 61 54 63 70 66 75 81 74 56 72 54 67 74 59 81 53 83 52 88 72 56 97 51 57 61 65 88 50 65 99 72 82 94 55 65 57 67 60 56 71 65 66 __64 76 76 72 53 66 46 64 70 64 72 57 82 56 94 66 51 96 50 58 61 62 92 50 71 92 86 80 100 61 65 98 64 59 51 66 71 67 64 CORRECT FIGURES - A number of figures in the October 1990 Little Rock School District enrollment chart in Thursday s newspaper were incorrect. The chart today has correct figures. Also, because of a reporting error, a storv that accompanied the chart contained some erroneous information when comparing last years official enrollment with this year s to calculate the difference. The Little Rock district actually has 190 fewer students than in October 1989.LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS S November 29, 1990 TO: Board of Directors FROM: THROUGH: V ,v Oames Dennings, Associate Superintendent for Desegregation > -> Monitoring and Program Development <3t Dr. Ruth Steele, Superintendent of Schools SUBOECT: First Quarter Enrollment - 1990-91 School Year Please find attached the enrollment report for the first quarter of the 1990-91 school year. cc: Senior Management TeamLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS COMPARISON OF ACTUAL ENROLLMENT FOR FIRST QUARTER OF 1990-91 AND 1989-90 1990-91 Actual enrollment as of October 31, 1990, First Quarter of the 1990-91 School Y ear. WHITE BLACK OTHER TOTAL %BLACK Special Schools Elementary (w/o Kindergarten) Junior High Schools 48 4041 1861 High Schools (w/o Kindergarten) 2159 26 8209 4004 3077 0 144 87 87 74 12,394 5,952 5,323 35% 66% 67% 58% SUB TOTAL 8109 15,316 318 23,743 65% Ki ndergarten 681 1,206 21 1,908 63% GRAND TOTAL 8790 16,522 339 25,651 64% 1989-90 Actual enrollment as of November 1, 1989, First Quarter of 1989-90 School Y e a r WHITE BLACK OTHER TOTAL %BLACK Special Schools Elementary (w/o Kindergarten Junior High Schools 47 3905 1917 High Schools (w/o Kindergarten) 2408 28 8212 3883 3186 1 76 119 12,236 97 83 5,897 5,677 37% 67% 66% 56% SUB TOTAL 8277 15,309 300 23,886 64% Kindergarten 628 1,269 20 1 ,917 66% GRAND TOTAL 8905 16,578 320 25,803 64%GRADE K 1 2 3 4 5 6 IJNGR TOTAL ELEM. 7 8 9 UNGR SUMMARY OF FIRST QUARTER ENROLLMENT October 31, 1990 WHITE BLACK OTHER* TOTAL %BLACK 681 727 659 670 684 666 595 40 4722 589 638 601 33 TOT. JR HIGH 1861 10 703 11 718 12 709 1206 1450 1271 1279 1408 1380 1309 112 9415 1366 1391 1182 65 4004 1082 980 967 21 30 21 24 29 14 26 0 165 21 26 40 0 87 32 30 24 1908 2207 1951 1973 2121 2060 1930 152 14,302 1976 2055 1823 98 5952 1817 1728 1700 63% 66% 65% 65% 66% 67% 68% 74% 66% 69% 68% 65% 66% 67% 60% 57% 57% UNGR 29 48 1 78 62% TOT. SR HIGH 2159 3077 87 5323 58% TOTAL: 8742 16,496 339 25,577 65% SPEC SCHOOLS 48 26 0 74 35% DIST TOTALS 8790 16,522 339 25,651 64% SUMMARY OF STUDENTS LISTED IN "OTHER" CATEGORY: SPANISH 93 ASIAN/PACIFIC ISLANDER - 218 ESKIMO/AMERICAN INDIAN OTHER 24 4LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FIRST QUARTER ENROLLMENT OCT. 31, 1990 SCHOOL/GRADE WHITE BLACK OTHER TOTAL %BLACK CENTRAL UNGRADED 10 11 12 SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL 0 203 174 227 604 0 604 5 308 278 307 898 49 947 0 12 9 13 34 0 34 5 523 46r' 547 1536 49 1585 100.00% 58.89% 60.30% 56.12% 58.46% 100.00% 59.75% FAIR UNGRADED 10 11 12 SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL 14 107 12 6 107 354 3 357 12 184 160 132 488 10 498 0 3 4 1 8 0 8 26 294 290 240 850 13 863 46.15% 62.59% 55.17% 55.00% 57.41% 76.92% 57.71% HALL UNGRADED 10 11 12 SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL 12 147 180 156 495 10 505 12 223 202 236 673 8 681 0 7 5 3 15 0 15 24 377 387 395 1183 18 1201 50.00% 59.15% 52.20% 59.75% 56.89% 44.44% 56.70% MCCLELLAN UNGRADED 10 11 12 SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL 3 127 121 113 364 2 366 19 209 200 158 586 17 603 1 6 2 2 11 0 11 23 342 323 273 961 19 980 82.61% 61.11% 61.92% 57.88% 60.98% 89.47% 61.53% PARKVIEW UNGRADED 10 11 12 SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL 0 119 117 106 342 0 342 0 158 140 134 432 11 443 0 4 10 5 19 0 19 0 281 267 245 793 11 804 0.00% 56.23% 52.43% 54.69% 54.48% 100.00% 55.10% Page - 1SCHOOL/GRADE t^LOVERDALE UNGRADED WHITE BLACK OTHER TOTAL %BLACK TOTAL DUNBAR UNGRADED TOTAL 7 8 9 7 8 9 FOREST HEIGHTS UNGRADED 7 8 9 TOTAL HENDERSON UNGRADED 7 8 9 TOTAL MABELVALE UNGRADED 7 8 9 TOTAL MANN UNGRADED 7 8 9 TOTAL PULASKI HEIGHTS UNGRADED 7 8 9 TOTAL 2 61 75 80 218 1 190 180 155 526 0 1 2 2 5 3 252 257 237 749 33.33% 75.40% 70.04% 65.40% 70.23% 120 55 56 231 158 143 111 412 3 0 3 6 281 198 170 649 56.23% 72.22% 65.29% 63.48% 7 62 70 83 222 9 156 186 174 525 0 7 3 8 18 16 225 259 265 765 56.25% 69.33% 71.81% 65.66% 68.63% 5 44 74 88 211 9 64 76 67 216 104 134 113 351 4 76 100 78 258 16 214 250 209 689 16 142 147 92 397 196 166 152 514 8 153 138 148 447 Page - 2 0 5 8 9 22 0 0 1 1 2 4 5 6 15 0 1 2 4 7 21 263 332 306 922 25 206 224 160 615 304 305 271 880 12 230 240 230 712 0.00% 81.37% 75.30% 68.30% 74.73% 64.00% 68.93% 65.63% 57.50% 64.55% 64.47% 54.43% 56.09% 58.41% 0.00% 66.52% 57.50% 64.35% 62.78%SCHOOL/GRADE SOUTHWEST UNGRADED WHITE BLACK OTHER TOTAL %BLACK TOTAL BADGETT UNGRADED SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL BALE UNGRADED SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL BASELINE UNGRADED SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 58 54 36 154 15 157 181 141 494 0 5 7 12 21 215 240 184 660 0.00% 73.02% 75.42% 76.63% 74.85% 2 6 4 8 10 11 5 46 11 57 3 10 10 8 11 14 4 60 7 67 13 14 11 6 14 13 71 19 90 3 16 25 35 39 17 21 156 9 165 4 50 38 47 46 41 44 270 32 302 49 42 38 37 30 30 226 37 263 Page - 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 2 6 1 7 1 1 2 0 0 0 4 1 5 5 22 29 43 49 28 26 202 20 222 7 60 48 56 61 55 49 336 40 376 63 57 51 43 44 43 301 57 358 60.00% 72.73% 86.21% 81.40% 79.59% 60.71% 80.77% 77.23% 45.00% 74.32% 57.14% 83.33% 79.17% 83.93% 75.41% 74.55% 89.80% 80.36% 80.00% 80.32% 77.78% 73.68% 74.51% 86.05% 68.18 o. o 69.77% 75.08% 64.91% 73.46%SCHOOL/GRADE BOOKER UNGRADED WHITE BLACK OTHER TOTAL %BLACK SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL BRADY UNGRADED SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL CARVER UNGRADED SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL CHICOT UNGRADED SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 43 36 34 40 46 34 233 30 263 44 50 51 52 53 56 306 44 350 1 4 0 3 0 0 8 1 9 88 90 85 95 99 90 547 75 622 50.00% 55.56% 60.00% 54.74% 53.54% 62.22% 55.94% 58.67% 56.27% 2 20 17 17 16 19 5 96 21 117 3 52 41 47 56 51 45 295 37 332 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 5 0 5 5 73 59 65 73 70 51 396 58 454 60.00% 71.23% 69.49% 72.31% 76.71% 72.86% 88.24% 74.49% 63.79% 73.13% 31 40 43 45 38 44 241 23 264 38 44 49 54 54 53 292 34 326 1 2 0 1 1 2 7 1 8 70 86 92 100 93 99 540 58 598 54.29% 51.16% 53.26% 54.00% 58.06% 53.54% 54.07% 58.62% 54.52% 10 31 25 20 21 22 20 149 27 176 8 66 46 43 46 42 48 299 50 349 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 18 98 71 63 67 65 68 450 77 527 44.44% 67.35% 64.79% 68.25% 68.66% 64.62% 70.59% 66.44% 64.94% 66.22% Page - 4SCHOOL/GRADE ^CLOVERDALE UNGRADED WHITE BLACK OTHER TOTAL %BLACK SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL DODD UNGRADED SUBTOTAL KIND. FAIR PARK UNGRADED SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 FOREST PARK UNGRADED 1 2 3 4 5 6 SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL 13 13 26 19 12 14 97 10 107 35 45 34 46 52 41 253 29 282 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 48 58 60 65 65 55 351 40 391 72.92% 77.59% 56.67% 70.77% 80.00% 74.55% 72.08% 72.50% 72.12% 3 22 17 16 11 28 18 115 19 134 4 20 28 28 28 25 40 173 19 192 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 3 7 43 45 44 39 54 59 291 38 329 57.14% 46.51% 62.22% 63.64% 71.79% 46.30% 67.80% 59.45% 50.00% 58.36% 14 9 8 8 6 6 51 10 61 56 41 40 37 42 32 248 29 277 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 71 50 48 45 48 38 300 39 339 78.87% 82.00% 83.33% 82.22% 87.50% 84.21% 82.67% 74.36% 81.71% 29 23 31 20 19 22 144 33 177 19 26 39 35 33 30 182 26 208 1 0 1 0 0 2 4 1 5 49 49 71 55 52 54 330 60 390 38.78% 53.06% 54.93% 63.64% 63.46% 55.56% 55.15% 43.33% 53.33% Page - 5SCHOOL/GRADE FRANKLIN UNGRADED WHITE BLACK OTHER TOTAL %BLACK SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL FULBRIGHT UNGRADED SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL GARLAND UNGRADED SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 t/GEYER SPRINGS UNGRADED 1 2 3 4 5 6 SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL 1 5 5 7 11 6 11 46 11 57 7 65 54 33 46 53 42 300 49 349 0 1 0 3 3 1 1 9 0 9 8 71 59 43 60 60 54 355 60 415 87.50% 91.55% 91.53% 76.74% 76.67% 88.33% 77,78 a. *6 84.51% 81.67% 84.10% 5 33 43 34 38 41 35 229 32 261 4 47 30 54 41 42 47 265 27 292 0 3 0 0 3 1 0 7 0 7 9 83 73 88 82 84 82 501 59 560 44.44% 56.63% 41.10% 61.36% 50.00% 50.00% 57.32% 52.89% 45.76% 52.14% 0 5 2 2 1 0 3 13 3 16 14 18 23 26 37 39 35 192 16 208 0 1 2 2 1 1 2 9 0 9 14 24 27 30 39 40 40 214 19 233 100.00% 75.00% 85.19% 86.67% 94.87% 97.50% 87.50 89.72 Q, o Q. *0 84.21% 89.27% 7 7 8 14 4 7 47 13 60 16 16 14 22 36 16 120 27 147 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 23 22 36 40 23 167 40 207 69.57% 69.57% 63.64% 61.11% 90.00% 69.57% 71.86% 67.50% 71.01% Page - 6SCHOOL/GRADE GIBBS UNGRADED WHITE BLACK OTHER TOTAL %BLACK SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL ISH UNGRADED SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL JEFFERSON UNGRADED SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL MABELVALE UNGRADED SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 20 17 16 29 24 20 126 15 141 26 26 25 34 27 23 161 25 186 1 1 3 1 0 0 6 0 6 47 44 44 64 51 43 293 40 333 55.32% 59.09% 56.82% 53.13% 52.94% 53.49% 54.95 o. 62.50% 55.86% 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 3 6 33 17 16 26 11 15 124 16 140 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 35 17 16 27 11 15 127 16 143 100.00% 94.29% 100.00% 100.00% 96.30% 100.00% 100.00% 97.64% 100.00% 97.90% 3 30 33 34 38 31 26 195 32 227 6 36 32 32 35 36 33 210 27 237 0 3 0 1 1 0 1 6 1 7 9 69 65 67 74 67 60 411 60 471 66.67% 52.17% 49.23% 47.76% 47.30% 53.73% 55.00% 51.09% 45.00% 50.32% 2 38 34 45 33 25 32 209 28 237 4 60 39 29 44 57 51 284 31 315 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 1 3 6 98 74 74 77 83 83 495 60 555 66.67% 61.22% 52.70% 39.19% 57.14% 68.67% 61.45% 57.37 51.67% 56.76% Page - 7SCHOOL/GRADE MCDERMOTT UNGRADED WHITE BLACK OTHER TOTAL %BLACK SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 23 33 22 35 22 27 162 29 191 2 46 38 59 47 54 47 293 26 319 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 4 4 8 2 71 72 82 82 76 74 459 59 518 100.00% 64.79% 52.78% 71.95% 57.32% 71.05 63.51% 63.83% 44.07% 61.58% MEADOWCLIFF UNGRADED 1 2 3 4 5 6 SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL 23 17 24 25 17 18 124 28 152 49 47 39 49 39 34 257 31 288 0 0 1 1 0 1 3 0 3 72 64 64 75 56 53 384 59 443 68.06% 73.44% 60.94% 65.33% 69.64% 64.15% 66.93% 52.54% 65.01% MITCHELL UNGRADED 1 2 3 4 5 6 SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL 0 10 2 3 2 2 2 21 5 26 7 30 26 24 19 29 18 153 31 184 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 40 28 27 21 31 20 174 36 210 100.00% 75.00% 92.86% 88.89% 90.48% 93.55 90.00% 87.93 Q. 'O 86.11% 87.62% OTTER CREEK UNGRADED 1 2 3 4 5 6 SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL 26 26 26 20 26 28 152 24 176 22 23 24 31 26 24 150 32 182 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 49 50 51 52 52 302 56 358 45.83% 46.94% 48.00% 60.78% 50.00% 46.15% 49.67% 57.14% 50.84% Page - 8SCHOOL/GRADE PULASKI HEIGHTS UNGRADED WHITE BLACK OTHER TOTAL %BLACK SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL RIGHTSELL UNGRADED SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 ROCKEFELLER UNGRADED 1 2 3 4 5 6 SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL ROMINE UNGRADED 1 2 3 4 5 6 SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL 22 17 16 7 12 7 81 23 104 26 30 29 33 31 33 182 31 213 1 0 1 1 0 1 4 2 6 49 47 46 41 43 41 267 56 323 53.06% 63.83% 63.04% 80.49% 72.09% 80.49% 68.16% 55.36% 65.94% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 23 6 4 7 8 2 50 26 76 3 9 8 11 8 7 6 52 8 60 33 33 27 27 21 17 158 32 190 34 24 27 25 26 23 159 33 192 10 58 41 40 39 37 52 277 43 320 Page - 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 3 0 3 33 34 27 27 21 17 159 33 192 60 31 31 33 34 25 214 59 273 13 67 49 51 47 46 59 332 51 383 100.00% 97.06% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 99.37% 96.97% 98.96% 56.67% 77.42% 87.10% 75.76% 76.47% 92.00% 74.30% 55.93% 70.33 76.92% 86.57% 83.67% 78.43% 82.98% 80.43% 88.14% 83.43% 84.31% 83.55%SCHOOL/GRADE STEPHENS UNGRADED WHITE BLACK OTHER TOTAL 5, BLACK SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL TERRY UNGRADED SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL WAKEFIELD UNGRADED SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 WASHINGTON UNGRADED 1 2 3 4 5 6 SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 3 5 7 35 23 19 32 30 17 163 28 191 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 6 1 7 7 35 24 21 33 32 19 171 32 203 100.00% 100.00% 95.83% 90.48% 96.97% 93.75% 89.47% 95.32% 87.50% 94.09% 33 32 30 39 37 28 199 32 231 40 37 41 44 46 52 260 26 286 2 1 1 1 0 0 5 2 7 75 70 72 84 83 80 464 60 524 53.33% 52.86% 56.94% 52.38% 55.42% 65.00% 56.03% 43.33% 54.58% 0 29 27 22 24 23 21 146 21 167 0 45 40 41 54 54 57 291 39 330 0 1 1 2 1 2 0 7 0 7 0 75 68 65 79 79 78 444 60 504 0.00% 60.00% 58.82% 63.08% 68.35% 68.35% 73.08% 65.54% 65.00% 65,48 5, 2 45 58 38 44 43 277 39 316 7 115 65 57 52 51 34 381 51 432 0 2 2 0 1 0 3 8 3 11 9 164 112 115 91 95 80 666 93 759 77.78% 70.12% 58.04% 49.57% 57.14% 53.68% 42.50% 57.21% 54.84 Q, 'O 56.92% Page - 10SCHOOL/GRADE WATSON UNGRADED WHITE BLACK OTHER TOTAL %BLACK SUBTOAL KIND. TOTAL WESTERN : UNGRADED 1 2 3 4 5 6 20 30 22 28 25 27 152 19 171 55 43 51 55 58 55 317 41 358 0 1 0 1 1 0 3 0 3 75 74 73 84 84 82 472 60 532 73.33% 58.11% 69.86% 65.48% 69.05% 67.07% 67.16% 68.33% 67.29% HILLS 1 2 3 4 5 6 SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL 19 17 14 19 22 14 105 17 122 29 32 31 31 31 38 192 19 211 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 1 3 48 49 46 50 53 53 299 37 336 60.42% 65.31% 67.39% 62.00% 58.49% 71.70% 64.21% 51.35% 62.80% WILLIAMS UNGRADED 1 2 3 4 5 6 SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL 30 32 31 41 30 26 190 26 216 38 37 38 49 45 39 246 33 279 2 0 1 2 0 2 7 0 1 70 69 70 92 75 67 443 59 502 54.29% 53.62% 54.29% 53.26% 60.00% 58.21% 55.53% 55.93% 55.58% WILSON UNGRADED 1 2 4 5 6 SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL 4 32 13 13 12 14 18 106 12 118 16 39 52 37 42 41 36 263 43 306 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 20 71 65 50 54 55 56 371 55 426 80.00% 54.93% 80.00% 74.00% 77.78% 74.55% 64.29% 70.89% 78.18% 71.83 *0 Page - 11SCHOOL/GRADE Woodruff UNGRADED WHITE BLACK OTHER TOTAL %BLACK SUBTOTAL KIND. TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 5 5 7 16 9 51 9 60 10 17 15 18 20 31 111 8 119 0 0 1 1 0 2 4 0 4 19 22 21 26 36 42 166 17 183 52.63% 77.27% 71.43% 69.23% 55.56% 73.81% 66.87% 47.06% 65.03% EASTER SEALS UNGRADED TOTAL 15 15 5 5 0 0 20 20 25.00% 25.00% ELIZ. MITCHELL UNGRADED TOTAL 26 26 13 13 0 0 39 39 33.33% 33.33% E. MITCHELL(DAY) UNGRADED TOTAL 7 7 8 8 0 0 15 15 53.33% 53.33% Page - 12)K )K X X X X * DATE START FEB-22 15:09 G3S P.Ol TRANSACTION REPORT FEB-22-91 ERI 15:16 SENDER RX TINE PAGES 6' 55" TYPE NOTE 5 RECEIVE OK X )K )K )K )K * X )|(La % 4 \ TO
'T FACSIMILE COVER SHEET DATE: time
?'O y I-i g'7/ -z^'Z/T! PAT NUMBER 5^. FROM: CLERK, U. S. DISTRICT COURT U. S. POST OFFICE AND COURTHOUSE 600 WEST CAPITOL, ROOM 402 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 (501) 178-S35J^TS 740-6351 j
I THIS FACSIMILE MESSAGE CONTAINS A TOTAL OF THIS COVER PAGE. PAGE(S) INCLUDING I MESSAGE SENT BY: ii 1 A < ... , r- a, Jafte V, Board of (Sth Cir,!9R2). -il histc . t)l de with Judgments i States District j .riot of Arkansas, I Districts in the I ve duty to elimi state-mandated /(cnwri V. Char- ' 0/ Education, L.Ed.2d fi54 I KO V.lLO.gO I if Missouri, 781 I.. 1H!S4), at n, 10. latrict transfers, I pattern of an- ynce of all parts a e county us the "lit, the history H 'tricts, and the supervisory flisti'icLs demon- I icis historically I unci were not E not s tonomoiis, Ev I PP. 428 {D.Del, I I School District >uit in further- ato eliminate all 't and branch, orders of this ..led education r, C/iarlotte UioH, supra
a, supra. In achieve inter! ti-egaed resi- I County have I 'ei^re by the I' bodr. act- witn the g ptoresis, and a series ol mg choices. 464, 90 S.Ct.
Swann w 'd of Educa- Esssr T 'I*' ,'yyy ''fs? .4** SI(~ I I I ..--Al ' *1? b ..Hl-
If i'H c*' ... a. LITTIsE ROCK SCHOOL DIST. v. PULASKI COUNTY cite M 964 F.Supp. 326 (1964) 7. The governmental actions affecting housing patterns in Pulaski County have hud a significant interdistrict effect on the schools in Pulaski County, which has resulted in the great disparity in the racial composition of the student bodies of the Little Rock district and the two defendants districts. i'wnnn w Charlotte Mecklen- burp Board of Education, supra, R. The segregative actions taken by the two defendant districts and their failure to take desegregative actions have had a significant interdistrict effect on the schools in Pulaski County, which has also contributed to the great disparity in the racial composition of the student bodies of the Little Rock district and the two defendant districts. Swann v, Charlotte tfecklen- burg Board of Education, supra. [2] 9, The Pulaski County Special School District has committed the following purposeful acts with continuing racially segregative intcrdistrict effects
(a) failed to adhere to the requirements of the Zin- namon decree
(b) constructed schools in locations which ensured that they would be racially identifiable schools
(c) failed to apportion the burdens of transportation equally on black and white students
(ri) refused to hire and promote black faculty and staff 'efused to allow deanne.va- tion to or co:.. oxidation with the other two districts
(D failed to assign students to schools in such a way as to maximize desegregation
ig) assigned students to special education rlasaificationa and gifted programs on a discriminatory basis
(h) assigned black principals . schools with high black enrollments
(I) created and maintained a racial imbalance in almost half its NAMI Little Rwk 1} Rrtdy 8) rw Fire 8) hn 0 FuCbHr-i 8) Jt/Jtnei 1 I) Terry 353 schools
and (j) closed and downgraded schools in black neighborhoods and failed to build new schools there. 10, The North Little Rock School District has committed the following purposeful acts with continuing racially segregative interdistrict effects
(a) failed to assign blacks to its central administration or to high school principalships and couching positions
(b) concentrated whites in schools north of Interstate 40 and blacks in schools south of it
(c) assigned students to special education classifications on a discriminatory basis
and (d) failed to apportion the burdens Of transportation equally on black and white students. 11. When Pulaski County Special School District and North Little Rock School District took the purposeful acts set forth in Conclusion Nos. 9 and 10 above, they knew Or should have known that they would have iiiterdistrict segregative effects. 12. The unconstitutional and racially discriminatory acts of the Pulaski County and North Little Kock School Districts have resulted in significant and substantial interdistrict segregation. Milliken r. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717, 744, 94 S.Ct. 3112, 3127. 41 L.Eri.2d 1069. 13. Since there are constitutional violations with interdisirict effects, an interdis- trict remedy is appropriate. Milliken e. Bradley, eupra
Liddell v. State of Missouri, supra. The remedial hearing w begin April SO. 1884. 14. The Pulaski County Board of Education and Arkansas State Board of Education are necessary parties who must be made subject to the Cxjurt's remedial order. CXKIBtT I Tab.* I. kEMn\?ARV (CHOOwS
FAGIbITiU INROLlMeXTe.AhS ITAFF 1 I 1 1 I I I } I 4 I riAS SLT.' a ll Tl I? U M /^It Oi> TIOX GKA5E8 CAPA C17Y* im ESSl.MT IIATION siaCk EXStMT 8U im tCHM, IL. TCSSI AOMRI APKU ,! 1 i 9 1 4 8 9 4 I I K ) XJ X I X-J X 1 K-l X I 5A <75 ,W WQ W Ml IM Ud 304 749 4M 447 499 (13 Ml 41 84 73 77 TJ rt w 7 M9 S-.fl IW Iffl ue .ni lU TA 71 4
TT 44 ?4 73 44 73 Wl in 111 nt at 3ti MI ) .114 ^-5 <-1 tn 49 49 49 14 4.4 40 44 (P- I 1 1 I I I I I I 0 I I q 0 0 9 4 I I i I jIB'? li' a * HL. TCHIW little rock school DIST, v. PULASKI COUNTY CllOR0S6AF.$upp,.U8 (1994) 365 b AhMiw. AbMrit< TJ 104 84 I.II 1.0 10.6 lU 80 11.0 1.0 1 I I 1 J 1 I 1 1 1 1 0 0 I 0 NAMK biMiJZauiii U) CMb B7I DMI Ui Dupri* IB) Ftiiltr YKAJ* IlkT. C1N hi- This (ihAhi
** '.li.\. nv KMlIMT ' VTIh IR \Tins KUl'K KMd.MT, hk Tf'HHJ, Hl. TI'HIW. H AhAlDS. AiiAlRX U > i 0 19 I BL 'CliKS ADMRt. K admm I M 11 19 Al i 1 X K-l K-4 K-B SM R7S 4M 400 IM B40 4M 4ia M 11 101 IZl 111 11 Q9 !7 u 10 '.'M 111 110 110 110 4.1 10 4.0 8.0 1 I I 16.8 7.0 140 81.1 8.0 9.0 89 1.0 71.9 i I ' IL AOMRS 80 e.o 16 90 10 04 e 4 0 .0 .0 8 J 10 1 6 6 1 0 0 0 0 9 S APM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 1 0 t Rifi/htUi m h/ ADUrs. * B 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I I I I I I j I tl 11) JMkiftVil. M) LinOmvk M) Lavur Mibiivkit Ml OakMM 17) OUCrsM U] CHMrCnib 11) Rina hm( ffi) RimwoM 71) BsblRMH 7|J Shu 78) Ihtfwood 74) IjMAKli. 70) Tayler 71) Tellmn t7) T^aiuktid 70] Wiuofl Tauli NAME U(t Raeii ?9j Sunbif 81) IltRdtnon ID MnR U] RuiMkl Hu. M} tauihwHi Tatli
Nnvh LiU) Rnk 10/ Rtntml M) LokawMtl 17) RidrrfiM 11) RHtOt^ foul. fw^ki Cfun'.j 101 hhw 111 /kinv|/No ) JbntlR/SA 11] Ml .SarthiMaoQ M) fUtinaM' Ml R/ivinhti. Ttttak * Mld^KMhMl M 09 17 U 10 ll 71 10 71 74 W M U 10 NA 69 17 I 9 A t I 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 NA B 9 X-l K 0 X-B X-0 K-0 K-1 K-< xe K-O X-1 XI K-0 X-4 K-0 K-< XI X-1 I.IM 77S 4M MO ,7 OK 710 9M 060 8N .IM 080 019 700 aw 7 178 OM HIM on 04 8)7 BIO 601 491 860 444 096 04? 477 1)4 074 790 4M au iia iOO )1.0SI U M 118 no 109 M TB n IM in 41 no 164 M U IB 4 968 119 IM 4 141 99 II 70 19 IB 94 M IIO 111 110 01 170 B4 9449 M " B 14 I n 19 10 11 II SO 48 e lO 84 lO II 41 Ml FA 900 11.0 Ho ND n.o o 166 U.0 M.0 NO 11.6 FO UI 900 198 Ifl.O 97.0 782.8 74 1.0 0.6 4.0 10 8.0 0.0 10 40 8.9 1.0 4.0 8.0 18 4.0 80 1.0 0.0 me 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I I J I I 1 98 1 0 0 0 r** 0 0 9 0 fl 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 fl J I 0 8 I SXHiiiTfl TihU . JVNIOR lUOH (TNOOLS. FACtUTlU, ENROLLMKNTS. ANO STAFr vear ALT. M OS 11 M NA NA Na NA H 'U 'M U *79 84 00 CQS Dl- t:on gradss CaFa> crrr 1IR3 ENfiLMT. * l.TfIz tATS SLACK enrlmt *1 bl. :u TCKM. * IL TCHM, AnMfti fi A&MHS. I 9 8 1 9 NA NA HA NA 9 I 8 I I I I 7f 7.1 1-1 7 I 7 7 1 7-1 IU1 <AA. 7-9 7-0 7 9 7-0 0 1 7-1 FO 992 W 175 M U.tf 19.1 1 2 na Ml MO Ttt KI OM MO 716 90 W M M 4.F9 lono MO IJlOC 400 -------- Tii 010 IM lOW o?i 1W> 4jr m 414 Mil MO 417 2.0W or M 14 ui 19a 140 MO Ml a III 1.0 lO.B Ml 8' A I $ u I 1 1 Ml an Ma 4 Bi U M IM UII lat Ml 117 SM IM T.tf tt so u 111 u.e SS.0 37.0 9U 1W.0 u AO 10 74 S7.0 I I J I 7 9 0 I 0 I I aiMi 440 OM 970 911 171 477 MB wM T fi 04 7S M U W **4 107 HI 1.84 09 99 94 106 1.009 29 IT A 11 IIK O!.O MB O&O Ito 47.i M.O 470 il01.9 m=23BK
. lio 8.6 TO 1.4 70 0.0 IB .l 8 I I I a 9 0-^ I 1 1 fl I I f.d -i!- Vz < 1 . i < I: I'i 356 584 FEDEKAL SUPPLEMENT JV ' Hi i
i IXXlBlTl Table IQ. SRKIOR HIUK KCHUUL*. YACJLITItB, BNKOLLMBNTB, ANO BTAfr .l I I NAMI UlwB-b ri Ctatffel Ml Hail M) Rkskviav TiUl YlAH BLT. 11 CON. 91. ttON CMADM 1 I I 10 la llUtl lO-lt CAfA* CITY IH) KXBLMT. <UTf^ ZATH BE.ACK ENRLMT. t BL. IMI TCHM. 4 BL. TGHBB. ADMU. B AOMU. i.m 1,110 1.0*8 4,111 I.H 1,0*4 liM* <i*l IM If 110 } l.iu BI4 79S 1,413 ** M 3 M 4S 01.0 *T,Q lao 11.8 889 n.8 M.8 I H Ninh LiiM lUei 180} NanhiHi IQiJ Ola Main Tfttti
fiJiiMl C>jiny ini rir Itt) Jaakansla. 1*41 MfClaUw 1*B) xnii 18*1 Oak Onr I8T) N Piilaikl IM) BntHMwn IWl Sybaa Hli. TiMl' TO **4 11 I* -If 78 '*4 M 1 I 1 B 3 t a l>lt IB-ll 71I 18-11 18 !A-lt Ml ICKIS 1.12 18 11 1,400 e.ooo 1,400 un 1,228 1.414 B4 lit 1.111 lit i.m l,0M 1,0*3 a.i m 1,181 1.478 1,040 81* 73* 4*1 7*71 54 *10 M4 W5 877 rr an MB MB 104 II* tto t I 1 s 08 I? in itf IM u it H IT 331 i** 401 ni 41 u HI 1.U? It n I* <0 u u H IO 4a.B U.B TUO BO.Q 43-C f* Bi.e 438 ITT.O 10* 8.8 110 11.0 B.I 4.0 14 10 UJ s 1 0 I B 8 I I 81 Q I 1 1 I I ( f .-/w\ Rollin FROST, Plaintiff, t V. i I CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, hIm OefenduntH. Civ. No. 83-1169. United States District Court, D. Hawaii. I April 13, 1984. I 1 I Section 1983 action was brought against city and county and others to recover damages arising out of aiieged beating of plaintiff by police officers. On defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to State claim and on ground that complaint was vague and conelusory, the District Court. Fong, J., held that
(1) fact that recourse tu state tort remedies was available to person who was allegedly beaten by police who responded to domestic disturbance call did not preclude section 1983 action in federal court for deprivation of substantive due process, given the alleged liberty deprivation suffioientl.y serious to shock the conscience and officers' willful and deliberate abuse of state authority, in manner which could not be characterised as random, and (2) construing complaint liber. ally, it was not so vague and conelusory as to warrant dismissal, particularly at early stage of proceedings and tn view of fact that some defendants wore as yet unidentified. Motion denied. i 1 I 1. Constitutional Law e2o2.5 Identificatiun of specific requirements of due process requires consideration of, among other factors, nature of the affected interest, and implicit in that principle is recognition that some interests, by their very nature, require more procedural protoctions than others. Amend. 14. U.S.C.A. Const. I 2. Civil Rights 413.9 Fact that recourse to state tort reme- din.s was available to person who was allegedly beaten by police who responded to domestic disturbance call did not preclude section 1983 action in federal court fur deprivation of substantive due process, given the alleged liberty deprivation siiffi- VI Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 TO: FROM: THROUGH: March 5, 1991 Ann Brown, Office of Desegregation Monitoring James Jennings, Associate Superintendent for Desegregation Monitoring and Program Development Dr. Ruth Steele, Superintendent of Schools p,' Dr. Herb Cleek, Deputy Superintendent SUBJECT: Request for Information - Building Capacities Please find attached the information you requested on building capacities for 1987-88 through 1990-91. Duiiding Although the 1990-91 building capacity information was submitted to your office on an earlier date, I have taken the liberty to include it here for the sake of addressing a concern that needs further explanation. In addition to responding to your request. I would like to use this opportunity to explain why have changed during certain years. At first glance,"it probably appears that building capacities are subject to change at any time without reason. Each change in school capacity, however, was caused by an attempt to correct a problem that started in the 198788 school year, provide some building capacities it space for a new program <1. e. particular grade level. ALP) , year. or address overloads at a As you can see on the attachment, most of the capacity changes occurred on the elementary level. I am working on a report that will explain the reason for each change that occurred at a particular school during the period of 1987-88 through 1990-91. In the interim, it is important that you understand why most of the schools experienced capacity changes between 1987-88 and 1988-89. 1987-88 The 1987-88 school year was the first year of the Districts "controlled choice student assignment plan. conrroiied Although the developers of this plan probably had good intentions, ___ Little Rock School District is still suffering from some of the mistakes that were made In the design of the student assignment plan. You might remember that I assumed my current position two weeks before the assignment letters for the new plan were mailed to parents. I was not Involved In theBuilding Capacities page two the development of the plan. The assignment plan developers are no longer employed by the Little Rock School District, It became apparent shortly after the parents received their assignment letters that the developers of the plan failed to consider the grade levels of students in making assignments. As a result, several schools had more students at a particular grade level than the building could actually accommodate. In addition to the disregard for the grade level of students. I also discovered that some principals were not aware of the capacity figures that were loaded in the computer for their buildings. _ A second set of capacity figures was collected and loaded into the computer shortly before my promotion. The building principals could not warn the developers of the problems that would be encountered with the new set of capacity figures because they were unaware that these figures were being used. The District decided to correct these problems by adding portable buildings. to the extent possible, split classes were used. Also, As you review the capacity figures for 1987-88, please keep in mind that these figures include numerous cases of additional portables and/or split classes. These corrective measures were used with the clear understanding that the District would implement a long-term plan to eliminate split classes and, where possible. portable classrooms. This mission could not be carried out over the ensuing years without reflecting some degree of change in building capacities. The 1987-88 school year also marked the beginning of program that affected capacity in all buildings. Accelerated Learning Program <ALP), a new The for Accelerated Learning <PAL), later renamed Program involved the use of classroom space for a computer lab and/or small group instruction. ' In summary, the disregard for grade levels in assigning students, the use of new capacity figures, * use of classroom space for special programs had a devastating effect on the next item for discussion grade structure. and the Grade Structure Grade structure refers to the number of classes at each grade level. The number of classes at each grade level is very Important because there must be enough seats at the succeeding grade level to accommodate students who have been promoted. The ideal grade structure is to have the number of classes at each grade level. same It is acceptable,Building Capacities page three however, to have more classes at the succeeding grade level than the previous grade level. For Instance, it is acceptable to have two fifth grade classes feeding into three sixth grade classes. acceptable, Although the latter is it does not represent the best use of resources since the succeeding grade level <l.e. have a surplus of seats that sixth grade) will course of the school year. may not be filled during the Only six of the 36 elementary schools in the Little Rock School District have an ideal grade structure. These schools are Booker. (4), Mitchell <2>, Romine (3), Terry (3), Watson (3), and Western Hills <2). The number in parentheses represents the number of classes at each grade level. Only six of the 36 elementary schools in the Little Rock School District have an leve1. These schools are Carver, Wakefield, and Woodruff. acceptable grade structure. Dodd, Garland, Jefferson, schools. In the remaining 24 elementary the grade structure is unacceptabl grade structure, the term "unacceptable means cases where the preceding grade level has more classes than the the next succeeding grade level. For Instance, it is unacceptable to have three third grade level classes feeding into two fourth grade level classes. unacceptable e. In regard to In most cases. the unacceptable grade structures were caused by the circumstances described earlier. The correction of this problem can also affect the capacity of the building.* If three third grade classes (capacity of 69 students) feed into two fourth grade classes (capacity of 50 students), total capacity for the two grades Is 119. If third grade classrooms is used the following yc fourth grade classroom, in order to correct the If one of the year as a the unacceptable the new third grade capacity is 46, new fourth grade capacity is 75. the two grades is 121. grade structure. and the The new total capacity for Another example Involves three kindergarten classes (60 students) feeding Into two first grade classes <46 students). The total for these two grades is 106. If of the kindergarten classrooms is moved to first grade t I f one o resolve the shortage of seats, the kindergarten capacity changes to 40 students, the first grade capacity changes to 69 students, and the new total for these two sradeq 1 no grades is 109. At least two schools currently have this problem, assume that building capacities must always remain static. Building capacities have to change if unacceptable grade structures are going to be corrected. incorrect to It isBuilding Capacities page four A schools capacity can is acceptable. also change when the grade structure If two kindergarten classes <40 students) feed into three first grade classes (69 students) and a first grade classroom is changed to kindergarten (60 kindergarten students and 46 first grade students), the capacity for these grades changes from 109 to 106. Involvement of Building Principals I have worked closely with building principals and assistant superintendents since the second semester of the 1987-88 school year to complete the Districts long-term mission to correct grade structures. ideal, It is absolutely Imperative that or at least acceptable, grade structures are functioning in all buildings, is evident In my February 15, An example of my Involvement 1988 memo to all non-magnet elementary principals (see attachment). This memo Is a good example of the complexities involved in correcting the capacity problems caused by controlled choice. Even though the 1988-89 building capacities were entered in the Districts computer on March 22, 1988 (see attachment), changes had to be made during the summer of 1988 to respond to retentions, new students, attrition, the elimination of additional split classes, etc. Capacities have also been changed since 1987-88 to allow a 1:20 teacher/pupll ratio at the racially identifiable schools. to open early childhood classes. to relieve overcrowding in some open space schools (Dodd and Baseline), to reduce class size in substandard size classrooms (i.e. Geyer Springs and Woodruff), to accommodate changes in the elementary gifted and talented program (1989-90). and to open additional self-contained and kindergarten classes. The District has experienced a steady growth in kindergarten enrollment over the past two years. The extent to which capacity changes in the future depends on the extent to which similar needs occur in the future. I will continue to work on the report I referred to earlier. I hope to get it to you in the near future. free to call memo. Please feel me if you have any questions concerning thisBuilding Capacities page five *(NOTE: Building capacity is based on the average class sizes specified by the standards. for grades 1-3 is 23 students. The average class size grades 4-6 is 25 students. The average class size for for kindergarten. There is no average class size Kindergarten may not exceed 20 students.) cc: Aruia Hart ''' Chip Jones Sterling Ingram Brady Gadberry Chris HellerSCHOOL 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 Central Fair Hall McClellan Parkview 2112 995 1397 1259 1150 2150 936 1220 1200 991 2150 936 1220 1200 991 2050 936 1220 1200 991/846 Cloverdale Jr. Dunbar Forest Heights Henderson Mabelvale Jr. Mann Pulaski Heights Jr. Southwest 657 792 843 990 669 975 774 807 750 1000 780 960 600 935 700 754 750 1000 780 960 600 935 700 754 750 812 780 960 600 935 700 754 Badgett Bale. Baseline Booker Brady Carver Chicot Cloverdale Dodd Fair Park Forest Park Franklin Fulbright Garland Geyer Spri.ngs Gibbs Ish Jefferson Mabelvale McDermott Meadowcliff Mitchell Otter Creek Pulaski Heights Rightsell Rockefeller Romine Stephens Terry Wakefield Washington Watson Western Hills Williams Wilson Woodruff King 303 397 492 720 440 475 634 394 422 346 440 467 535 397 235 348 256 488 558 483 465 326 374 378 328 414 510 306 515 472 305 492 328 530 418 268 374 278 394 417 660 420 472 563 420 424 351 461 447 607 320 235 351 220 490 541 531 465 280 383 328 280 320 467 260 537 472 Closed 472 328 515 409 245 Closed 258 397 417 656 480 613 543 422 403 359 436 463 612 320/316 237 351 180 473 564 559 454 280/273 383 328 234/240 320/297 484 260 537 472 840 472 328 515 504 209 257 415 390 656 491 613 558 464 386 383 403 484 587 300 255 351/332 200 513 562 562 481 280/273 378 378 240 320 537 260 537 517 866 537 355 517 428 209TO: FROM: THROUGH February 15, 1988 All Non-Magnet Elementary Principals James Jennings, Associate Superintendent - Desegregation y.. I^Angel a Sewall, Associate Superintendent - School Improvement SUBJECT: 1988-89 Building Capacity Projections Please find attached the building capacity projections for 1988-89. These ^.projections should reflect the information you recently gave to Mary Jane Cheatham. It is my understanding that these figures will address the following concerns for the 1988-89 school year: (1) the elimination of portable buildings wherever possible
(2) the elimination of split classes wherever possible
(3) enough capacity at next year's grade level to accomodate students presently assigned to your building
(4) enough additional classrooms available to accomodate special programs such as space for an ALP lab, self-contained classes etc. Please sign by the name of your school and return to my office if these projections are accurate. If corrections are needed, please make the corrections sign by the name of your school and return to my office, should be returned by Friday, February 19. All projections Capacities at the racially identifiable schools will be changed at a later date to reflect the 20:1 pupi1-teacher ratio ordered by the Eighth Circuit Court of AppealsK /7 Bale Brady Fair =ark oUlLDir'Jc CAr.-.2.TI53 40-/ 40/ i,' 1 o 5S GS 5"' G = 13SS-3S 4 c 5 Total AV Forest Park 40/ GSJ P~ J2<5^' Frankl in 60^ GS Fulbright 60'"' cr b = V .J Garland 3S 30 X e:~3or\ c z s:- 3 S K i r.g G McCernot t 40 0/ 3^ Pulaski Heights
This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.