Little Rock School District (LRSD) Fourth Quarter Status Report, Volume I, part 2

Page: 162 Progran Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Program Name: School Operations Program Code: Priaary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportisiities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Nuifcer Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Cosfiletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 7. (cont'd) 4.1 Provide a district transportation program for student transportation when necessary to assure equitable participation for students participating in district-sanctioned extracurricular activities. 4.2 Provide a program for students* access to equipment/isiiforsB, etc., needed for participation at mininal cost. 4.2 (LRSD will develop guidelines explaining the procedures in acquiring equipment/uniform needs at minimal cost will be available to students) July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 Jire 30, 1994 June 30, 1994 Manager of Si<:port Services, Assoc, sipt. for Desegregation, Assistant Sipts. (Director of Transportation) Principals 4.1 Yearly (annual) analysis of participation data and cosfmrative profiles 4.1 (Survey the schools to see how many students will need transportation in order to assure equitable participation) 4.2 (Track the utilization of the program in order to determine the nurber and cost) 0^1Page: 163 Progroi Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Program Name: School Operations Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremlllion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportivtities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Mimfcer 7. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date (kmpletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 5. Develop (and use) school profiles (to) provide overview of school success or its iipect on students so that changes and/or interventions can take place as needed. or o July 1, 1993 Jme 30, 1994 (Principals and Staff, Monitoring Teams) 5. (An assessment of the data collected for the school profile will be reviewed by the principals and staff at each school to determine degree of student success and if any new procedures or changes need to take place)Page: 164 Progran Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Prograa Name: School Operations Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportmities for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Munfcer Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 7. (cont*d) 5.1 Profile school by: a. grade distribution b. attendance c. disciplinary outcomes d. test scores e. student involvement in school- related activities f. course enrolIments/special program enrol Iments Senior High Schools A. Three of the six high schools have gathered information for the School Profile. B. Tuo of the six schools reported developing school profiles cKiring the second quarter. C. Three of the six high schools have reviewed and examined information on school profiles. 0. Three high schools have reviewed and examined information on School Profile in the fourth quarter. Area Junior High Schools or, 3 July 1. 1993 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 June 30, 1994 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 Principals, Staffs, Assistant Sipts. 5.1 Use of data-besed school profiles 5.1 Yearly comparative students 5.1 Production of iiqx'ovement plans to address disparities 5.1 (The data based school profiles by grade distribution, attendance, and disciplinary outcomes will be analyzed each nine week period to make recommendations for change where indicated. The data based school profiles by course enrollment/special program enrollment will be analyzed each semester. The data based school profile by test scores will be analyzed and compared annually)Page: 165 Prograa Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Prograa Noae: School Operations Prograa Code: Priaary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Prograa Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportmities for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Mmtoer Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Ccapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 7. (cont'd) A. One of six area junior high schools permit the enrollment of students who do not meet the typical academic profile into a special Science program with parent request or permission. B. Three of the six schools reported relative data on the school profile is reviewed and utilized. C. Two of the six area junior high schools have gathered information for the school profile. D. Three area junior high schools reportedly developed and used profiles. Junior High Magnet Schools A. Both junior high magnet schools reported that relative items are available on the school profiles. B. Both magnet junior high schools have gathered information for the school profile and they are available for review. Elementary Area Magnet Schools A. School profile in place. B. One school reported thirteen field trips involving students in school-related activities. C. All magnet schools report reviewing school profiles on a quarterly basis for revision as needed. D. All schools report reviewing school profiles on a quarterly basis for revision as needed. Elementary Interdistrict Magnet Schools 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 10/01/93 01/03/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 12/31/93 03/30/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94Page: 166 ProgrM Seq f: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Progrm Hme: School Operations Progrm Code: Primry Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Progrm Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Wmfccr Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria A. Both schools report using all components to determine the need to alter programs implemented at their schools in order to focus on the learning condition of students. B. Both schools report conpiling and revising data-based school profiles according to information requested. 08/2493 10/01/93 09/30/93 12/31/93 7. (cont'd) C. Both schools report reviewing school profiles on a quarterly basis for revisions as needed. D. Both schools report reviewing school profiles on a quarterly basis for revisions as needed. Incentive Schools A. Three incentive schools are completing the School Profile, and three schools have conpleted School Profiles. Elementary Area Schools A. Data is being collected by seven schools. B. Six area schools report reviewing school profiles on a quarterly basis for revisions as needed. C. Nineteen area schools report reviewing school profiles on a quarterly basis for revisions as needed. 0. Twenty-two area schools report reviewing school profiles on a quarterly basis for revisions as needed. 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 03/31/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94Page: 167 Progran Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Program Name: School Operations Program Code
Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Hudtner 5.2 L 40 7. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 5.2 Data to be disaggregated by race. Senior High Schools A. Two of the six high schools gathered disaggregated data by race. B. One of the six high schools reported data being disaggregated by race during the second quarter. C. One of the six high schools reportedly disaggregated data by race. 0. One high school reportedly disaggregated and updated data by race during the fourth quarter. Area Junior High Schools A. One of six schools reported HPT data disaggregation completed. B. Four of the six area junior high schools disaggregated by race. C. Three area junior high schools reported the disaggregation of data by race. For example, one school reported data from school reports analyzed by teachers/administrators. Junior High Magnet Schools A. One of the two junior high nagnet schools reported that disaggregated data is available for review. July 1. 1993 June 30, 1994 (Principals, Pupil Services Team, Teachers) 5.2 Outcomes en/aluation 5.2 (Data in annual school report) (All data submitted in the school's annual report is to be disaggregated by race) 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 10/01/93 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 12/31/93Page: 168 Program Seq f: 09 Revisicxi Date: July 26, 1994 Program Naaie: School Operations Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Numiter Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria B. Both magnet junior high schools have gathered disaggregated date by race. Elementary Area Magnet Schools A. Data in place at four schools B. All schools reported collecting student data by race/gender for performance monitoring. C. All schools reported collecting student data by race/gender for performance monitoring. Elementary Interdistrict Magnet Schools A. Both schools report initiating programs to decrease disparity as a result of disaggregating the data. 6. One of the schools reports collecting student performance data. C. Both schools reported collecting student data by race/gender for performance monitoring. D. Both schools reported collecting student data by race/gender for performance monitoring. Incentive Schools A. One incentive school has addressed the data in their School Profile. B. One incentive school reports that enrollment is 98X black. Elementary Area Schools A. Seven schools report that data to be desegregated by race included in the school's profile. 01/03/94 08/24/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 08/24/93 03/30/94 09/30/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 09/30/93 IPage: 169 PrograM Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Program Mame: School Operations Prograa Code: Priaary Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Prograa Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Mtfifcer 5.3 L 40 7. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Caa|>letion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria B. Five schools reported collecting student data by race/gender for performar>ce monitoring. C. Nineteen schools reported collecting student data by race/gender for performance monitoring. 0. Twenty schools reported collecting student data by race/gender for performance monitoring. 5.3 Provide for developaent of and ii^jlcmentation of intervention strategies to address disparate situations with specific steps for iiqwovaaent. Senior High Schools A. One of the six schools reported analysis of conditions and the development of strategies to address those needs by the Student Biracial Conmittee during the second quarter. B. Three of the six high schools reported the developnent and inplementation of Intervention strategies. C. Three high schools reported the development and implementation of intervention strategies. Area Junior High Schools A. One of six area schools reported the development and implementation of intervention strategies. 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 July 1, 1993 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 Jine 30, 1994 12/31/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 (Principals, Pupil Services, Team, Teachers) 5.3 (Based on the data provided by the schools in the school profile (5.1) each school team will address and docunent the disparate situations with specific steps for improvement on the identified timeline in 5.1) 0=^8Page: 170 Program Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Program Name: School Operations Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportmities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Mififeer Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria B. One of the six schools reportedly has developed an action plan to address disparate situations based on equity monitoring response. C. Four of the six junior high schools reported the development and implementation of intervention strategies. 0. Two area junior high schools provided for the development of and implementation of intervention strategies to address disparate situations with specific steps for improvement. Junior High Magnet Schools 7. (cont'd) A. Both magnet junior high schools reported the development and inplementation of intervention strategies. B. One magnet junior high school provided for the development of and implementation of intervention strategies to address disparate situations with specific steps for improvement. Elementary Area Magnet Schools A. Strategies in place at four schools 6. One school has implemented a buildinglevel criterion reference tests of mastery. C. Five schools report interventions strategies to address disparate situations are in place. 0. All schools report interventions strategies to address disparate situations are in place. Elementary Interdistrict Magnet Schools 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 12/31/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 03/30/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94Pase: 171 Progran Seq t: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Progran Mane: School Operations Progran Code: Prinary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Progran Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Mmfcer Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Conpletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria A. Both schools report interventions strategies to address disparate situations with specific steps for improvement. B. Both schools report having instructional plans and special strategies for students with the eliminations of disparities as priority. C. Both schools report interventions strategies to address disparate situations are in place. 0. Both schools report interventions strategies to address disparate situations are in place. Incentive Schools A. 1. One incentive school has homework centers and peer tutoring implemented as strategies to address disparity situations. 2. One school reports a self-esteem building program to provide for black males. Elementary Area Schools A. One school is in the process of reviewing intervention strategies to be implemented for improvements. B. Seven schools report intervention strategies to address disparate situations are in place. C. Eighteen area schools report interventions strategies to address disparate situations are in place. D. Nineteen area schools report interventions strategies to address disparate situations are in place. 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94PrograiB Seq *: 09 ProgrsM Natae: School Operations Program Code: Program Goal: Plan Reference Page Nuiber 9. L 41 1. L 41 1.1 L 41 1.2 L 41 LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Primary Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSO. Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Page: 173 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 9. To review and assess testing practices, formats, and results in order to better address the needs of all students while providing special intervention for disadvantage students. 1. Visits to schools by testing/evaluation monitoring team to assess validity and reliability of testing procedures and strategies eaployed to prepare students for test taking. 1.1 Meetings with principals, teachers 1.2 Infonaal classroom visits by monitors Senior High Schools A. One of the six schools reported informal monitoring visits during the second quarter. B. Two of the six high schools docunented monitoring team visits. C. Three high schools documented monitoring team visits the fourth quarter. Area Junior High Schools July 1, 1993 July 1. 1993 July 1. 1993 July 1. 1993 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 Jine 30. 1994 June 30. 1994 June 30. 1994 Jaw 30. 1994 12/31/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 (Planning, Research, and Evaluation) Planning. Research, and Evaluation Assistant Supts.. Principal. Staffs. Educational Programs 9. Random monitoring by Planning. Research, and Evaluation 1. (The Planning. Research, and Evaluation Team will provide performance reports of teacher interviews to principals following each monitoring visit) 1.1 Monitoring visits and reports 1.1 (The monitoring team will report back to the principal the assessment of their classroom visits) 1.2 (Schedule of meetings and docunentation of participants) 1.2 (The monitoring team will report back to the principal the assessment of their classroom visits)Page: 174 Prograa Seq f: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Prograa Naiae: School Operations Prograa Code: Priaary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Prograa Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportKiities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Mtmber Objectives Strategies Beginning Date C(xq>leticin Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria A. Two of the six area junior high schools reported teacher observations by monitors had occurred for this quarter. 10/01/93 12/31/93 9. (cont'd) B. Two of the six area junior high schools reported informal classroom visits by monitors hod occurred. C. Three area junior high schools reported informal classroom visits by monitors had occurred during the fourth quarter. Junior High Magnet Schools A. Both junior high magnet schools reported informal classroom visits by monitors had occurred. B. Informal classroom visits by monitors have been conducted at each magnet junior high school. C. One magnet junior high school reported informal classroom visits by monitors had occurred during the fourth quarter. Elementary Area Magnet Schools A. One magnet school reports visits by monitors. B. Three magnet schools report visits by the monitors. C. Three magnet schools report visits by the monitors. Elementary Interdistrict Magnet Schools A. Both schools report visits by monitoring teams. One school reports the second formal observation completed on the staff. B. Both schools report visits by the monitors. or 9 01/03/94 04/01/94 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 10/01/93 01/03/94 03/30/94 06/30/94 12/31/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 12/31/93 03/31/94Page: 175 Program Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26. 1994 Program Name: School Operations Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportisilties for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Nuii^er 1.3 L 41 1.4 L 41 9. (contd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria C. Both schools report visits by the monitors. Elementary Area Schools A. Seven area schools report visits by monitors. B. Nineteen area schools report visits by the monitors. C. Fifteen schools report visits by the monitors. 1.3 Compilation of comparative data b/ school. 1.4 Evaluation of data with recommendations for changes/iaprovements Senior High Schools A. One of the six high schools reported activity for changes/improvements based upon the evaluation of data. Pupil Services Comnittee Example: B. Three high schools reported activity for changes/iiTprovements based upon the evaluation of data. Test Inservices Ex: Grades/semester Area Junior High Schools A. Three of the six area junior high schools reported methods for evaluation of data with reconmendations for changes/improvements. Examples: Review of Stanford 8 test scores and evaluation of instruction 0^3 04/01/94 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 July 1. 1993 July 1. 1993 01/03/94 04/01/94 10/01/93 06/30/94 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 Juw 30, 1994 Jme 30, 1994 03/30/94 06/30/94 12/31/93 Educational Programs Principals and Staff 1.3 (Graphs or tables illustrating yearly changes in scores on state and standardized tests will be prepared and distributed to all schools) 1.4 (Each school's staff will analyze and evaluate all data with recommendations for changes and/or improvements)Page: 176 Prograai Seq *: 09 Reviaion Date: July 26, 1994 Progran Naate: School Operations Progran Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Progran Goal: The intent of the School Operations goat is to provide equitable educational opportKiities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Wmtoer Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria B. Three of the six area junior high schools reported changes/improvements based upon data evaluation. C. Three of the junior high schools evaluated data with recomnendations for changes/improvements. Ex: Management Team Meetings. Educational 01/03/94 04/01/94 03/30/94 06/30/94 Junior High Magnet Schools A. One of the two junior high magnet schools documented the review of at-risk student data and a review of discipline problems data as strategies for the evaluation of data with recomnendations for changes/improvements. B. Changes/inprovements based upon evaluation of data are noted by one magnet junior high school. Example: English Plus classes C. One magnet junior high school evaluated data with recommendations for changes/improvements. Ex: Educational Management Team Meetings 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 12/31/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 Elementary Area Magnet Schools A. Changes/improvements rxjted in school improvement plan of three schools. 08/24/93 09/30/93 9. (cont'd) B. Five schools reported determining needs, changes and/or improvement pertinent to successful student opportunities. 01/03/94 03/31/94 C. Four schools reported determining needs, changes and/or improvement pertinent to successful student opportunities. 04/01/94 06/30/94 Elementary Interdistrict Magnet Schools or/JPage: 177 PrograM Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Program Name: School Operations Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Mtmtjer Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Ccapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria A, Both schools report having refined the programs to make necessary changes for interventions. e. One school reports determining needs, changes, and/or improvements needed to meet student needs. One school reports the use of multicultural strategies to aid in student achievement. C. Both schools reported determining needs, changes and/or improvement pertinent to successful student opportunities. D. Both schools reported determining needs, changes and/or improvement pertinent to successful student opportunities. Incentive Schools A. Three schools report that the evaluation of data with strategies for improvement is reported in the Annual School Plan. Elementary Area Schools A. Eight schools report that the evaluation data with strategies for changes/improvements is reported in the school's improvement plan. B. Six area schools reported determining needs, changes, and/or improvements pertinent to successful student opportunities. C. Sixteen schools reported determining needs, changes, and/or improvements pertinent to successful student opportunities. 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94Page: 178 ProgrsM Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26. 1994 Prograa Name: School Operations Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Muifcer 2. L 41 9. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 0. Nineteen schools reported determining needs, changes, and/or improvements pertinent to successful student opportunities. 2. Disaggregation of test results by grade, by race (and by gender) for review and assessment for intervention purposes. Senior High Schools A. Two of six high schools identified activities where disaggregated data was reviewed. B. One of the six high schools identified activities where disaggregated data was reviewed. C. During the fourth quarter one high school identified activities were disaggregated data was reviewed. Area Junior High Schools A. Three of the six area junior high schools reported that the disaggregation of test results by grade, race, and gender for review and assessment for intervention purposes had occurred for this reporting quarter. B. Two of the six area junior highs identified activities where disaggregated data was reviewed. C. Three area junior high schools reported disaggreagation of test results by grade, by race (and by gender) for review and assessment for intervention purposes occurred during the fourth quarter. Junior High Magnet Schools 04/01/94 July 1, 1993 08/24/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 06/30/94 Jkw 30, 1994 09/30/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 12/31/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 (Principals, Staffs) 2. (Intervention strategies to reduce disparity by race and gender will be written at each grade level where disparities exist)Page: 179 Prograa Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Prograa Maae: School Operations Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Mtiiber Objectives Strategies Begirviing Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria A. One of the two junior high magnet schools reported the disaggregation of test results for review and assessment for intervention purposes. B. Both magnet junior high schools recorded data disaggregation and review activity. Elementary Area Magnet Schools A. Data reviewed by three schools. B. One school has secured a Winthrop Rockefeller Grant of S7,500 to provide interventions for disadvantaged students. 9. (cont'd) C. All magnet schools report disaggregation of test results by grade, race and gender for review and assessment for intervention purposes. 0. AU schools report disaggregation of test results by grade, race and gender for review and assessment for intervention purposes. Elementary Interdistrict Magnet Schools A. Both schools report having developed strategies based on disaggregate test data. B. One school reports utilizing appropriate intervention strategies to meet students' needs. One school reports developing strategies to reduce disparities based on disaggregated test data as needed. C. Both schools report disaggregation of test results by gra^, by race and gender for review and assessment for intervention purposes. 10/01/93 01/03/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 12/31/93 03/30/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 IPage: 180 Progra* Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26. 1994 PrograM Name: School Operations Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Progran Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Ntiitjer 2.1 L 41 9. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coaipletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 0. Both schools report disaggregation of test results by grade, by race and gender for review and assessment for intervention purposes. Incentive Schools A. Three incentive schools report that test results by grade and race can be reviewed in the Annual School Plan. Elementary Area Schools A. Eleven schools report that test data has been disaggregated by grade, race and gender. B. Six schools report disaggregation of test results by grade, race, and gender for review and assessment for intervention purposes. C. Sixteen area schools report disaggregation of test results by grade, race and gender for review and assessment for intervention purposes. D. Nineteen schools report disaggregation of test results by grade, race and gender for review and assessment for intervention purposes. 2.1 School analysis of test results by grade, teachers, race, and sii>ject area. Senior High Schools A. One high school included special intervention strategies for disadvantaged students in the Annual Improvement Plan. 04/01/94 08/24/93 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 July 1, 1993 08/24/93 06/30/94 09/30/93 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 June 30, 1994 09/30/93 Principals, staffs, Assistant Si<>ts., Testin^Evaluat ion 2.1 Data assessaent and docuaented interventions as needed 2.1 (Intervention strategies will be written to address any disparities in race occurring in subject areas)Page: 181 PrograM Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Program Name: School Operations Progran Code: Priamry Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, GremlUion and Anderson Progran Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportixiities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Muifcer Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria B. One of the six high schools reported a grade/semester test inservice as an activity to analyze data. C. One high school reported a Grade/Semester Test Inservice as an activity to analyze data. Area Junior High Schools A. Three of the six area junior high schools reported school analysis of test results by grade, teachers, race, and subject area. 01/03/94 04/01/94 10/01/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 12/31/93 B. One of the six area junior high schools indicated special intervention strategies for disadvantaged students on the School Improvement Plan. 01/03/94 03/30/94 C. Three area junior high schools reported the analysis of test results by grade, teachers, race, and subject area. 04/01/94 06/30/94 Ex: Biracial Meetings Junior High Magnet Schools A. Analysis was reportedly completed at both magnet junior high schools. 01/03/94 03/30/94 Elementary Area Magnet Schools A. Analysis coinpleted by four schools. B. Five magnet schools report having analyzed test results by grade, teacher, race and subject area. 08/24/93 01/03/94 09/30/93 03/31/94 C. All schools report having analyzed test results by grade, teacher, race and subject area. 04/01/94 06/30/94 Elementary Interdfstrict Magnet SchoolsPage: 182 PrograM Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Program Name School Operations Program Code Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportoiities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Nurtjer Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 9. (cont'd) A. Both schools report having analysis data provided by Planning, Research, and Evaluation to determine intervention strategies. B. Both schools reports using the Planning, Research, and Evaluation test data summaries to plan special strategies to reduce disparities. C. Both schools report having analyzed test results by grade, teacher, race and subject area. D. Both schools report having analyzed test results by grade, teacher, race and subject area. Incentive Schools A. 1. One school reports that their school analysis of test results by grade, teacher, race and subject area can be reviewed in the Annual School Plan. 2. Two schools report that their schools' analysis by grade, teacher, and race are complete. Elementary Area Schools A. Nine schools report reviewing, analyzing, and disaggregation of test results by grade, teacher, race and subject area. B. Eight schools report having analyzed test results by grade, teacher, race, and subject. C. Seventeen area schools report having analyzed test results by grade, teacher, race and subject area. 0. Twenty-three area schools report having analyzed test results by grade, teacher, race and subject area. ^70 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94Page
183 Program Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26. 1994 Program Mame: School Operations Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportKiities for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Muifcer 2.2 L 41 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 2.2 Development of coaperative data to assess disparity areas, if any. July 1, 1993 June 30, 1994 (Planning, Evaluation and Testing, Principals, and Staff 2.2 Report of outcoates 2.2 (Correlation of grades between races will be analyzed for additional remediation) Senior High Schools 9. (contd) A. One high school conducted a faculty meeting to address disparities on 8/19/93. 08/24/93 09/30/93 B. Two of the six high schools reported conpared data the third quarter to assess disparity areas. C. Two high schools reportedly compared data the fourth quarter to assess disparity areas. Area Junior High Schools A. Two of the six area junior high schools reported the development of comparable data to assess disparity areas, if any. B. Four of the six area junior high schools compared data to address disparities. C. Two area junior high schools docunented the development of comparative data to assess disparity areas. Junior High Magnet Schools A. One of the two junior high magnet schools reported the development of coiTparative data to assess disparity areas, if any. B. One of the two magnet junior high schools reportedly compared data to address disparities. 01/03/94 04/01/94 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 10/01/93 01/03/94 03/30/94 06/30/94 12/31/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 12/31/93 03/30/94Page: 184 Progran Seq f: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Progran Nane: School Operations Progran Code: Priiaery Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Nuiber Objectives Strategies Beginning Date CcMf>letion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 9. (cont'd) Elementary Area Magnet Schools A. Data compared to address disparities at one school. B. All elementary magnet schools report utilizing performance data to address disparities. C. All schools report utilizing performance data to address disparities. Elementary Interdistrict Magnet Schools A. Both schools report using data to study disparity and to provide interventions. B. Both schools report utilizing student performance data to address disparities. C, Both schools report utilizing performance data to address disparities. D. Both schools report utilizing performance data to address disparities. Incentive Schools A. Two schools report that their baseline data is established and a comparative analysis is done by grade level. Elementary Area Schools A. Eight schools report comparing test data from one year to the next to determine disparities. B. Six schools report utilizir^ performance data to address disparities. C. Sixteen elementary area schools report utilizing performance data to address disparities. 0. Twenty area schools report utilizing performance data to address disparities. Q 08/24/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 09/50/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94Page: 185 PrograM Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Program Name: School Operations Program Code: Priaery Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportisiities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Nuiber 2.3 L 41 9. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date CoRfiletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 2.3 Preparation of intervention plans to address specific student needs. Senior High Schools A. Two of the six high schools developed intervention plans to address specific student needs. B. Two of the six schools reported preparation of intervention plans to address student needs during the second quarter. C. Three of the six high schools developed intervention plans to address specific student needs. D. One high school developed intervention plans to address specific student needs. Ex: Assessment Project Completed Area Junior High Schools A. One of six schools reported each teacher completed intervention strategies to address specific student needs. B. Two of the six schools docunented the preparation of intervention plans to address specific students needs. Example: Math Assistance Program C. Two of the six area junior high schools developed intervention plans to address specific student needs. 0. Three area junior high schools prepared intervention plans to address specific student needs. Ex: UALR tutoring in Mathematics and Reading o 3 July 1, 1993 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 Jisie 30, 1994 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 Principals, Staff, Asst. Sqots., Assoc. Si^ts. 2.3 Existence of plans 2.3 (Intervention plans addressing specific student needs will be prepared and distributed by the teachers within and between the grades)Page: 186 Prograa Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Prograa Maae: School Operations Prograa Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Prograa Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportmities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Nud^er Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coaipletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 9. (contd) Junior High Magnet Schools A. One of the two junior high magnet schools docunented the preparation of intervention plans to address specific student needs. B. One of the two junior high magnet schools reportedly developed intervention plans. Elementary Area Magnet Schools A. Intervention plans are in place at two schools. B. One school reports that intervention plans are addressed in its Annual School Improvement Plan. C. Five schools report that intervention plans are addressed in the annual school improvement plan. 0. Four schools report that intervention plans are addressed in the annual school improvement plan. Elementary Interdistrict Magnet Schools A. Both schools report having intervention strategies distributed to all grade levels. B. Both schools report reviewing intervention plans for students' progress. C. Both schools report that intervention plans are addressed in the annual school improvement plan. 0. Both schools report that intervention plans are addressed in the annual school improvement plan. 10/01/93 01/03/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 12/31/93 03/30/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94Page: 187 PrograiB Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Program Name: School Operations Program Code: Priiaary Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportwities for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Mmber Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria Incentive Schools A. One school reports that the student education plans and school improvement plans have been developed. Elementary Area Schools A. Six schools reported that intervention plans are developed. B. Seven schools report that intervention plans are addressed in their Annual School Improvement Plan. C. Twenty area schools report that intervention plans are addressed in the annual school improvement plan. 0. Twenty-one schools report that intervention plans are addressed it the annual school improvement plan. 08/24/93 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 09/30/93 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 Qnr uProgram Seq *: 09 Progran Nane: School Operations Progran Code: Progran Goal: Plan Reference Page Nifiber 10. Page 42 1. Page 42 1.1 Page 42 LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Prinary Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportmities for alt students in the LRSO. Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coaf)letion Date Psge: 188 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 10. To give school principals sufficient authority to iaprove schools and to advocate for students, and to hold them acccMjitable for results and opporttsiities for all students. 1. Develop/enhance site-based management at designated schools. 1. (Form a committee to define site-based management and to survey school principals for interest in piloting) Area Junior High Schools A. One of six schools indicated a Steering Committee had addressed the objective to define site-based management. 1.1 Staff developaient for principals. 1.1 (Make available to all principals ongoing staff development programs that will enhance their skills) Senior High Schools A. One high school conducted a computer workshop for the building administrators. G July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 08/24/93 July 1, 1993 08/24/93 Jkw 30, 1994 Jisie 30, 1994 09/30/93 Jine 30, 19 09/30/93 (Board of Directors, Superintendent, Cabinet) (Representatives from Principals' Roundtable, Staff Development, Asst. Supts.) Assoc, and Assistant S(<>ts. (Staff Development) 10. (The annual school report should reflect an increase in achievement and a reduction in disparity) 1. Principal Evaluation Process 1. (Implement site-based management plan for the pilot schools) 1.1 Conduct of staff develcpBient 1.1 (A quarterly report will identify each principal and the workshop in which he/she participated)Page: 189 Prograa Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Prograa Maae: School Operations Prograa Code: Priaary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Prograa Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportiaiities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Nimtier Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 10. (cont'd) B. All secondary principals were invited to attend an inservice on completing the Program Budget Document durir>g the secorxj quarter. One high school reported another staff development activity requested for its administrative staff. 10/01/93 12/31/93 C. One of the six high schools docunented the Program Budget Docunent inservice for principals as a staff development activity. 0. One high school docunented an inservice on the proposed academic support program in math relative to the staff development for principals. Area Junior High Schools A. One of the six area junior high schools reportedly has provided staff development for principals. B. One of the six area junior high schools reported staff development for principals had been provided. C. One school reported staff development for the principal had occurred at one school. Junior High Magnet Schools A. One of the two junior high magnet schools docunent staff development activities for prirv:ipals. Example: Discipline Management Elementary Area Magnet Schools A. One school reports staff development for the principal. B. Five magnet schools report principals atteixling staff development. 01/03/94 04/01/94 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 01/03/94 10/01/93 01/03/94 03/30/94 06/30/94 12/31/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 03/30/94 12/31/93 03/31/94Page: 190 PrograM Seq 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Program Mane: School Operations Progran Code: Prinary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Nuiber 1.2 Page 42 10. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coaf>letion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria C. Five schools report principals attending staff development. Elementary Area Schools A. Six area schools report principals attending staff development. B. Seventeen area schools report principals attending staff development. C. Seventeen area schools report principals attervling staff development. Elementary Interdistrict Schools A. Both schools report principals attending staff development. B. One school reports atterKling National Convention. 1.2 Revision of district procedures to provide technical support from central office rather than strict control. Senior High Schools A. One of the six senior high schools reported working on a district convnittee to revise the administrative evaluation procedures during the second quarter. Area Junior High Schools 04/01/94 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 01/03/94 04/01/94 July 1, 1993 10/01/93 06/30/94 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 03/31/94 06/30/94 Jie 30, 1994 12/31/93 (Planning, Research, and Development
Principals
Principals* Roundtable) 1.2 Principal Feedback 1.2 (A survey will be implemented by the principals to identify the district procedures that they consider to be barriers) 9 Q aPage: 191 PrograM Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Prograai Name: School Operations Program Code: Primry Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Wuitoer Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria A. One of the six junior schools reported the practice of maintaining a file on each applicant for a school position. B. One of the six area junior high schools noted an inservice from the Federal Programs Office had been provided. C. Two area junior high schools reported activity relative to the revision of district procedures to provide technical support from central office rather than strict control occurred during the fourth quarter. Ex: District staff development for acfcninistrators. Junior High Magnet Schools A. One of the two junior high magnet schools reported that the adninistration have provided input, when requested, to Central Office. Elementary Interdistrict Magnet Schools 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 01/03/94 10. (cont'd) A. Both of the interdistrict magnet schools report providing feedback and information to district staff upon request. Elementary Area Schools A. Three of the area schools report 10/01/93 12/31/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 03/30/94 12/31/93 evidence of technical assistance rather than strict control. O*) 9 10/01/93 12/31/93Page: 192 Progra* Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Program Naae: School Operations Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, GremiUlon and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportmities for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Wuifeer 1.3 L 42 2. L 42 2.1 L 42 3. L 42 3.1 L 42 10. (cont*d) 10. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coa^letion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1.3 Enhance principal accomtabi Iity for program at the building. 2. Provide support to revitalize school environaents to make it conducive to student learning and to order. 2.1 Plan of district school renovation to meet prograaiaatic and student population needs. 3. Respond to principal requests for assistance in a timely manner. 3.1 Set i<> format for technical assistance with assigned personnel to work with individual schools. 3.1 (Provide to the principals an organizational chart with names and job responsibilities as a format for technical assistance) Senior High Schools * July 1, 1993 July 1. 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 Jirte 30, 1994 Jine 30, 1994 Jine 30, 1994 Jine 30, 1994 Jine 30, 1994 (Asst. Supts.) Director of Support Services, Asst. Supts., Dept. Heads) Support Services (Asst. Supts.) (Director of Support Services) Assoc, and Assistant Supts., Educational Prograias Curriculim Directors, Stpervisors, and Coordinators (Communications Dept.) 1.3 Asst. S(<)t. evaluations of school climate and prograam and principal manageaent of these 1.3 (Assistant Supts. will provide feedback to principals regarding his/her performance throughout the year preceding the written evaluation) 2. (Number of requests completed will be compared to the number of requests made by the school principals in order to evaluate support given by the district in a timely manner) 2.1 (Identify the number of renovations completed which enhance progrannatic and student population needs) 3. (List number of requests received and identify nurber of actions taken) 3.1 C(f>letion of task and principal evaluation of plan 3.1 (Quality feedback from the principals on the timeline completion for assistance requested)Page: 193 Program Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Program Mame: School Operations Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Greffiillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Nimber Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria A. One school maintains a file of applicants for school positions and reviews race and gender balance as vacancies arise. 08/24/93 09/30/93 B. One of the six high schools reported format for technical assistance had been set up. 01/03/94 03/30/94 QQlPrograM Seq f: 09 PrograM Haiae: School Operations PrograM Code: PrograM Goal: Plan Reference Page Muifcer 11. Page 43 1. Page 43 LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Priaiary Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSD. Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coafiletion Date Page: 194 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Robertson, GrefliiUion and Anderson Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 11. To review staffing patterns and staff assignaents in all schools and district offices for equity. July 1. 1993 Jine 30, 1994 (Principal, Staff, Asst. Supts., Monitoring Team) 11. (Equitable racial and gender representation in all positions will be achieved) 1. Update review of recruiting needs by age, race, sex, and seniority in positions in the district to ascertain projected needs. Senior High Schools A. One of the six high schools reported reviewing files at Hunan Resources during the second quarter. B. Review of recruiting needs and adjustments were reported by three of the six high schools. C. Review of recruiting needs and adjustments were reported by tuo schools. Area Junior High Schools A. Two of the six area junior high schools reported that an updated review of recruiting needs by age, race, sex, and seniority is done. B. Two of the six junior high schools noted the review of recruiting needs. July 1, 1993 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 10/01/93 01/03/94 Jine 30, 1994 12/31/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 12/31/93 03/30/94 (Director of Human Resources, Principals, Department Heads and Recruitment Officer) 1. District-wide Monitoring process (all departaents) 1. (A structured process will be inplemented in the Hunan Resources Office to make lists of applicants by race available to the principals in a timely manner) Q O OPage: 195 Progran Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Prograai Name: School Operations Program Code: Priaery Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Mwber Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Caaf>letion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria C. Three area junior high schools reported activity relative to the update review of recruiting needs by age, race, sex, and seniority in positions in the 04/01/94 06/30/94 11. (cont'd) district. For example, one school reportedly utilized the services of the Recruitment Office of LRSO Junior High Magnet Schools A. One of the two magnet schools reported relative files were maintained to keep an updated review of recruiting needs. B. Review of recruiting needs and requests based upon the relative review has been conducted at both magnet junior highs. Elementary Area Magnet Schools A. Review of recruiting needs conducted by two schools. B. Five magnet schools report reviewing recruiting need by age, race and sex and providing feedback and information to the district on request. C. Five schools report reviewing recruiting needs. Elementary Interdistrict Magnet Schools A. Both interdistrict magnet schools report providing feedback and information to district staff upon request to ascertain projected needs of recruitment. B. Both schools report reviewing recruiting need by age, race and sex and providing feedback and information to the district on request. 003 10/01/93 01/03/94 08/24/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 10/01/93 01/03/94 12/31/93 03/30/94 09/30/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 12/31/93 03/31/94Page: 196 Progran Seq f: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Progras Name: School Operations Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Nuiiwr 1.1 Page 43 11. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coafiletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria C. Both schools report reviewing recruiting needs. Elementary Area Schools A. Thirteen area schools report reviewing recruiting need by age, race and sex and providing feedback and information to the district on request. C. Fourteen schools report reviewing recruiting needs and providing feedback and information to the district on request. 1.1 Review of all current staffing with identification of staff by sex, race, and subject area who will be retiring to project needs Senior High Schools A. One of the six senior high schools reported activity toward the review of staffing. B. Four schools reported activities toward the review of staffing. Area Junior High Schools A. Two of the six area junior high schools reported a review of all current staffing with identification of staff by sex, race, and subject area of projected retirees had been done. 04/01/94 01/03/94 04/01/94 July 1, 1993 01/03/94 04/01/94 10/01/93 06/30/94 03/31/94 06/30/94 June 30. 1994 03/30/94 06/30/94 12/31/93 Director of Human Resources, Principals (Department Heads) 1.1 Coapletion of tasks 1.1 (Provide and maintain an updated list of those staff members who will be retiring) 1.1 (Review available staffing) ">04Page: 197 Program Seq f: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Program Name: School Operations Program Code: Prinary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportuiities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Himber objectives Strategies Beginning Date (^mpletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria B. The assessment of current and future staff needs was reported by two of the six junior high schools. C. Three area junior high schools documented activity regarding the review of all current staffing with identification of staff by sex, race, and subject area who will be retiring to project needs. Junior High Magr>et Schools A. Or>e of the two junior high magnet school principals has reviewed staffing and provided data as requested. Elementary Area Magnet Schools A. Assess current and future staff r>eeds implemented by one school. B. Five magnet schools report reviewing all staffing patterns by race, sex and subject area projected needs based on retirements. C, Five schools report reviewing all staffing patterns by race, sex and subject area projected needs based on retirements. Elementary Interdistrict Magnet Schools 01/03/94 04/01/94 01/03/94 08/24/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 03/30/94 06/30/94 03/30/94 09/30/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 11. (contd) A. Both schools report having maintained an updated list of staff -- on-goir>g monitoring of sex and race of current and incoming staff. B. Both schools report reviewing all staffing patterns by race, sex and subject area projected needs based on retirements. C. Both schools report reviewing all staffing patterns by race, sex arxJ subject area projected needs based on retirements. 08/24/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 09/30/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 005Page: 198 Progran Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Progran Hane: School Operations Progran Code: Prinary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Progran Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Muitner 1.2 L 43 2. L 43 11. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coa^letion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria Incentive Schools A. One incentive school reported a complete breakdown of certified staff by sex, race, and subject area. Elementary Area Schools A. Five schools report that they review ell current and incoming staff according to race, sex and gender. B. Fifteen area schools report reviewing all staffing patterns by race, sex and subject area projected needs based on retirements. C. Nineteen schools report reviewing all Staff patterns by race, sex and subject area projected needs based on retirement. 1.2 Projection of student population on two-year basis to validate expected needs. Senior High Schools A. One school reviewed student enrollment and identified the need to recruit more students. 2. Review of position assignaents related to racial equity (so) so that all races are represented in every position and job description in the district. Senior High Schools A. One high school identified activities to ensure a racially balanced staff. QOG 08/24/93 08/24/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 July 1, 1993 08/24/93 July 1. 1993 08/24/93 09/30/93 09/30/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 June 30, 1994 09/30/93 June 30, 1994 09/30/93 Assoc. Sqst. for Desegregation (Director of Human Resources, Principals, and Department Heads) 1.2 (A student population projection wi11 be published) 2. (Annual study of report provided by Human Resources showing all positions in the district by race and sex)Page: 199 Program Seq f: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Program Name: School Operations Program Code: Priaery Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportuiities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Muifcer Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria B. Two of the six high schools identified activities to ensure a racially balanced staff. C. Two high schools identified activities to ensure a racially balanced staff. Area Junior High Schools A. One of six schools indicated the principal had performed the relative review. B. Three of the six area junior high schools docimented the review and statistical analysis of data for the second quarter. C. Three of the six area junior high schools identified activities to ensure a racially balanced staff, of Position Control Example: Review D. Three area junior high schools docimented activity related to the review of position assignments for racial equity. Junior High Magnet Schools A. Both magnet junior high schools documented review and statistical analysis of data so that racial equity is evident in every position and job description in the district had occurred. B. One magnet junior high principal analyzed statistical data in the building to ensure racial equity in all positions. Elementary Area Magnet Schools A. Review of needs identified annually. 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 10/01/93 01/03/94 08/24/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 12/31/93 03/30/94 09/30/93Page: 200 Program Seq f: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Program Hane: School Operations Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportuiities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Himber Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Ccm^letion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria B. One school reports using the school's profile to review assignment related to racial equity. C. Five schools report making employee recommendations that are consistent with racial equity. D. Five schools report making employee recommendations that are consistent with racial equity. 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 11. (cont'd) Elementary Interdistrict Magnet Schools A. Both schools report making ^loyee recomnendations that report racial equity in all job assignments wherever possible. B. Both schools report making employee recommendations that are consistent with racial equity. C. Both schools report making employee recommendations that are consistent with racial equity. Incentive Schools A. Two schools report new job position assignments related to racial equity Elementary Area Schools A. Eight schools report reviewing position assignments relative to racial equity. B. Five area schools report making employee recommendations that are consistent with racial equity. C. Seventeen area schools report making employee recommendations that are consistent with racial equity. 08/24/93 10/01/93 04/01/94 08/24/93 08/24/93 10/01/93 04/01/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 06/30/94 09/30/93 09/30/93 12/31/93 06/30/94Page: 201 Program Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Program Mame: School Operations Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportKiities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Mtijfcer 2.1 L 43 11. (cont'd) 11. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coi^)letion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 2.1 Development and assessment of school and divisional staffing patterns. Senior High Schools A. One high school completed staffing assessment in August 1993. B. Two of the six high schools reported the assessment of staffing had been developed. C. Two high schools reported the assessment of staffing had been developed. Area Junior High Schools A. One of six schools reported the assessment of staffing patterns had been done. B. One of the six schools reported that data of the school's staffing patterns are maintained. C. The assessment of staffing patterns had been conducted at three of the six schools. C. Activity relative to the development and assessment of school and divisional staffing patterns was documented by two schools. Ex: Review of Position Control Junior High Magnet Schools A. One of the two magnet junior high schools reported that data of the school's staffing p>atterns are maintained. OOP vJ July 1. 1993 08/24/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 10/01/93 Ji>w 30, 1994 09/30/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 12/31/93 Director of Huaan Resources, Principals, Department Heads (Assistant Supts.) 2.1 Coaf)letion of tasks 2.1 (Assess annual school study to ensure the staffing patterns are meeting the district's staffing guidelines)Page: 202 Progran Seq f: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Progran Hane: School Operations Progran Code: Prinary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportmities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Niiit)er Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coa|)letion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria B. One of the two magnet junior high schools maintained data of school staffing patterns. C. Activity relative to the development and assessment of school and divisional staffing patterns was documented by two schools. Elementary Area Magnet Schools A, 1. 2. School staffing assessed. School Profile staffing". B. Five schools report having developed or is developing assessments of school and divisional staffing patterns. C. Five schools report having developed or is developing assessment of school and divisional staffing patterns was documented by two schools. Elementary Interdistrict Magnet Schools A. Both schools report having all staff members interviewed by a team consisting of principal and representatives from the PTA, Joshua, and curriculm specialists. B. One school reports using the school profile to review staffing patterns and staff assignments. C. Both schools reports having developed or is developing assessments of school and divisional staffing patterns. D. Both schools reports having developed assessments of school and divisional staffing patterns. 11. (cont'd) Elementary Area Schools A. Five schools refer to staff/school personnel rosters provided by the Human Resources Office. 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 06/30/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 09/30/93Page: 203 Program Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Program Name: School Operations Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportinities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Muifeer 2.2 L 43 objectives Strategies Beginning Date Conpletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 8. Eighteen area schools reports having developed or is developing assessments of school and divisional staffing patterns. C. Thirteen schools reports having developed assessments of school and divisional staffing patterns. 2.2 Recruitment of support and nonteaching staff to reflect equitable racial representation in all positions. Senior High Schools A. One of the six high schools reported having a recruitment team during the second quarter. B. One of the six high schools reported recruitment relative to non-teaching staff to reflect equitable racial representation is operating. C. One school reported recruitment relative to non-teachir>g staff to reflect equitable racial representation is operative. 01/03/94 04/01/94 July 1. 1993 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 03/31/94 06/30/94 Jifie 30, 1994 Principals, Director of Hunan Resources (Recruiting Officer) 12/31/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 2.2 Enhance racial balance in all positions 2.2 (The nunber of support and non-teaching staff recruited will reflect an equitable racial representation as measured by LRSD guidelines) 2.2 (Equitable racial end gender representation in all positions will improve) 2.2 (Principals and department heads will document evidertce that effort was put forth to recruit racial representation in their respective areas)Page: 204 Prograa Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Prograa Naae: School Operations Prograa Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Prograa Goat: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Muifcer Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 11. (cont'd) Area Junior High Schools A. One of the six area junior high schools documented evidence of the recruitment of support and non-teaching staff to reflect equitable racial representation in all positions. B. Three of the six area junior high schools documented recruitment efforts to reflect equitable racial representation in all positions. C. Three area junior high schools reported activity related to the recruitment of support and non*teaching staff to reflect equitable racial representation in all positions. Elementary Area Magnet Schools A. Recruitment in place. B. Five magnet schools report making employee recommendations consistent with racial equity. C. Five schools report making employee recomnendations consistent with racial equity. elementary Interdistrict Magnet Schools A. place. Both schools report recruitment in B. Both schools report making employee recommendations consistent with racial equity. C. One school report making employee recommendations consistent with racial equity. onp 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 12/31/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94Page: 205 Program Seq f: 09 Revision Date: July 26. 1994 Program Name: School Operations Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for alt students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Ntmfcer Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria D. Both schools report making employee recomnendations consistent with racial equity. Incentive Schools A. One school reports doing a breakdown on non-certifled staff to reflect equitable racial representation. B. One school reports that the principal works in conjunction with the Human Resources Department to help ensure equity. Elementary Area Schools A. Eight schools report activities for recruitment of support and non-teaching staff to reflect equitable racial representation. B. Five area schools report making employee recommendations consistent with racial equity. One area school reported that a racial balance will exist among classified personnel. C. Fifteen area schools report making employee recommendations consistent with racial equity. 0. Fifteen area schools report makir>g employee recommendations consistent with racial equity. 04/01/94 08/24/93 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94Progra* Seq f: 09 Prograa Naaie: School Operations Prograai Code: Prograai Goal: Plan Reference Page Nimtier 12. Page 44 1. Page 44 1.1 Page 44 1.2 Page 44 1.3 Page 44 LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Primry Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSO. Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Page: 206 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 12. To establish recruitment prograaK for representat i on positions. of minorities in all July 1, 1993 Jine 30, 1994 12. Increase in representation of minority persons as ccmpared to baseline data. 1. Create pool of currently-certified teacher applicants and of students pursuing certification. 1.1 Share applicant pools with PCSSO/NLRSO (see collaborative) 1.1 (Collaborative" refers to the Desegregation Plan) 1.2 Share with NLRSO/PCSSO recruitment processes at local, state, and regional schools with particular concentration on schools (colleges) with populations of minority students. 1.2 (Each district will share and evaluate their recruitment process as it relates to the recruitment of minority students) 1.3 Establish "in school" recruitment procedures for Juiior and senior high school students who evidence an interest in the teaching profession. 004 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 June 30, 1994 June 30, 1994 Jine 30, 1994 June 30, 1994 (Director of Human Resources, Minority Recruiter, Asst. Supts.) Huaan Resources Direetors-- three districts (LRSO Minority Recruiter) Huaan Resources Directors*- three districts (LRSO Minority Recruiter) Practicing teachers (three districts) on a voluntary basis. Principals, Kuaan Resources Office, Teacher Sponsors of FTA (LRSD Minority Recruiter, Counselors) 1. (The number of applicants in the pool (by race and gender) will be recorded in the Human Resources Office and updated each semester) 1.1 Completion of task 1.1 (The nuiber and names of applicants by race and gender will be shared with the other school districts) 1.2 Preparation of and implementation sharing plan 1.2 (The list of college students and teacher applicants recruited will be kept by name, race, and gender by each district for sharing) 1.3 lapleaientation of procedures 1.3 (Survey high schools to determine the number of students by race and gender who are participating in the Teachers of Tomorrow Club)Page: 207 Program Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Program Naaie: School Operations Program Code: Priaiary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Ntarfcer 12. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria Senior High Schools A. Three of the six high schools have established Teacher of Tomorrow programs. B. One of the six high schools reported in school recruitment procedures for prospective teachers during the second quarter. C. Three of the six high schools have reportedly established recruitment procedures for junior and senior high students who evidence and interest in the teaching profession. 0. Four schools have reportedly established recruitment procedures for junior and senior high students who evidence an interest in the teaching profession. Area Junior High Schools A. Two of six schools indicated the establishment and use of Teacher of Tomorrow for recruiting students interested in the teaching profession. B. Three of the six schools reported the establishment of "in school" recruitment procedures. C. One of the six schools noted the establishment and activity Teacher Appreciation Day. D. Two area schools reported the establishment of "in school" recruitment procedures. Junior High Magnet Schools A. One magnet school hosts pre- professional students from five universities. 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 005Page: 208 Progran Seq f: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Progran Naiae: School Operations Progran Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Progran Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page MuNber 1.4 L 44 12. (contd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria B. Both magnet schools reported the establishment of in school recruitment procedures. C. At one of the tuo magnet junior highs, students reportedly shadow teachers in Career Orientation Class project. Elementary Area Magnet Schools A. B. 10/01/93 01/03/94 12/31/93 03/30/94 Clubs organized in two schools. One school has established a Teachers of Tomorrow Club for sixth grade students. Incentive Schools A. One school reports the organization of a Teachers of Tomorrow Club. purchased for 6th graders profiling careers in education. Videos were 1.4 Provide internship prograas at district schools for aspiring teachers and aspiring adainistrators. Senior High Schools 08/24/93 10/01/93 08/24/93 July 1, 1993 09/30/93 12/31/93 09/30/93 Jwie 30, 1994 Collaborative effort with local universities, Huaan Resources Office, Educational Programs (Director of Teachers of Tomorrow) 1.4 Increase in pool of (minority) teacher/ administrator applications for LRSD 1.4 (Document the number of internship programs and the number of aspiring minority teacher/administrator applicants who participated in the programs)Page: 209 Program Seq f: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Program Name: School Operations Program Code: Prinary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportmities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Umber objectives Strategies Beginning Date Cosfsletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria A. One high school has a teacher who is currently enrolled in an internship program for administrators. B. Two of the six high schools reported the existence of internship programs. C. Two schools reported the existence of internship programs. 08/24/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 09/30/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 00*7PrograM Seq *: 09 Program Name: School Operations Program Code: Program Goal: Plan Reference Page Nisifcer 13. L 45 1. L 45 LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Prinary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSO. Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Page: 210 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 13. To ensure school-wide planning and individual academic achievement
to address disparities, individual needs and student success, and to provide staff development on an ongoing basis. July 1, 1993 Jine 30, 1993 13. Evaluation of school iifw-ovement plan and annual report. 1. Provide school-based planning based on analysis of all available data
a specific format for addressing school racial, gender, SES disparities. 1. (SES = Socio-Economic Status) Senior High Schools A. Three of the six high schools conducted planning activities that required the use of data analysis. B. One of the six high schools reported on activity on school-based planning to evaluate school racial, gender, SES disparities. C. Two of the six high schools conducted planning activities which required the use of data analysis. D. Two high schools conducted planning which require the use of data analysis during the fourth quarter. Area Junior High Schools A. One of six schools presented a student assistance program as a means for addressing relative disparities. July 1. 1993 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 Jiaie 30. 1994 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 (Principals
Staffs,
Educational Programs
Planning, Research, & Evaluation
Asst. Supts.) 1. (Assessment of individual school improvement plan will show an increase in student achievement and a reduction in disparity by race and gender)Page: 211 Program Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Program Name: School Operations Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Nimtier Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Conpletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria B. One of the six schools reported school-based planning based on analysis of all available data uas occurring. 10/01/93 12/31/93 13. (cont'd) C. Two of the six area Junior highs conducted planning activities that required the use of data analysis. D. Provision for school-based planning based on analysis of all available data and a specific format for addressing school racial, gender and SES disparities occurred at two areas junior high schools. Ex: At on school, faculty and steering coimiittee meetings held discussions about student achievement. Junior High Magnet Schools A. Both magnet Junior highs conducted planning activities which required the use of data analysis. Elementary Area Magnet Schools A. Data is on file at four schools. B. Four elementary magnet schools report providing school-based planning based on analysis of all available data. C. All elementary magnet schools reported providing school-based planning based on analysis of all available data. Elementary Interdistrict Magnet Schools A. Both schools report having their Annual School Plans revealing the increase in student achievement and therefore reducing disparities based on assessment by race and gender. Qog 01/03/94 04/01/94 01/03/94 08/24/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 03/30/94 09/30/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 09/30/93Page: 212 Progran Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Progran Nane: School Operations Progran Code: Prinary Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Progran Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Nuaber Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Ccmpletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria B. Both schools report reviewing the Annual School Plan, school profile, and NCE data analysis to address school racial, gender, and disparities. 10/01/93 12/31/93 13. (cont'd) C. Both schools report providing school- based planning based on analysis of all available data. D. Both schools report providing schoolbased planning based on analysis of all available data. Incentive Schools A. One school responded to strategies of analysis of all available data. Elementary Area Schools A. Eight schools provided school-based analysis in their Annual School Plan. B. Six area schools report providing school-based planning based on analysis of all avallable data. 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 08/24/93 10/01/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 09/30/93 12/31/93 C. Eighteen schools report providing school-based planning based on analysis of all available data. 01/03/94 03/31/94 0. Nineteen schools report providing school-based planning based on analysis of al I available data. 04/01/94 06/30/94 1.1 L 45 1.1 Formulate guidelines for school iaprovement plans which will lead to specific achievement increases and interventions to assist students. July 1, 1993 June 30, 1994 Educational Program
Canaittees of Principals
Planning, Research, & Evaluation 1.1 Formulation of guidelines, plans, and interventions 1.1 (School improvement plans wi11 reflect achievement increases in targeted students) Area Junior High SchoolsPsge: 215 Progran Seq f: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Progran Name: School Operations Progran Code: Prinary Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Progran Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportuiities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Nurber objectives Strategies Beginning Date Conpletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria A. Guidelines have been formulated at one of the six area junior high schools. B. One area junior high school formulated guidelines for school inprovement plans. Junior High Magnet Schools A. Guidelines have been formulated for school improvement plans and are utilized regularly to assist in achievement increases. Elementary Area Magnet Schools A. Guidelines formulated at four schools. Elementary Interdistrict Magnet Schools A. One of the two schools report reviewing the Annual School Improvement Plan to enhance student achievement. Incentive Schools A. Five schools report the Annual School Plan contains guidelines for school improvement plans which will lead to specific achievement increases and interventions to assist students. 01/03/94 04/01/94 01/03/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 08/24/93 13. (cont'd) Elementary Area Schools A. Eight schools report that the Annual School Plan contains guidelines for school improvement which will lead to specific achievement increases and instructions to assist students. B. Tuo schools report reviewing the Annual School Improvement Plan to enhance student achievement. 03/30/94 06/30/94 03/30/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 09/30/93 08/24/93 10/01/93 09/30/93 12/31/93 401Page: 214 PrograM Seq f: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Program Name: School Operations Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Huifcer 1.2 L 45 13. (contd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria C. Five area schools report having school wide planning to address achievement. 1.2 Via disaggregation of data relative to: (Specific date with reference to:) a. student performance b. discipline c. attendance d. participation in school activities e. placement in classes Senior High Schools A. Three high schools conducted data collection and analysis activities in preparing the School Improvement Plan. B. One of the six schools reported that the School Improvement Plan addressed issues of student performance, discipline, attendance, participation in activities, and placement. C. Two of the six high schools conducted data collection and analysis activities. 0. Three high schools conducted data collection and analyses activities the fourth quarter. Area Junior High Schools A. Two of the six area junior high schools reported strategies to address the relative disparities. B. Two of the six schools reported the disaggregation of data relative to the associative items. 01/03/94 July 1. 1993 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 03/31/94 June 30, 1994 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 School staffs, Principals, School laproveaent Teaae 1.2 Disaggregated outcoae- based data 1.2 (Data will reflect an increase in student performance, positive discipline and attendance, participation in school activities, and equitable placement in classes)Page: 215 PrograM Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Program Mame: School Operations Program Code: Prinary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, GremiIlion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportisiities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Nudaer Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria C. One of the six junior high schools conducted data collection and analysis activities in preparing the school improvement plan. D. Two area junior high schools docimented activity related to the disaggregation of data. Junior High Magnet Schools A. One of the two magnet schools reported an analysis of relative data had been completed for school profile. B. Data is reportedly disaggregated and available for use at both magnet junior high schools. Elementary Area Magnet Schools A. Data disaggregated by four schools B. Four schools report referring to the school profile and quarterly district report to determine appropriate instructional needs. C. Five schools report referring to the school profile and quarterly district report to determine appropriate instructional needs. Elementary Interdistrict Magnet Schools A. Both schools report following the specific data in reporting performance. B. Both schools report referring to the school profile and quarterly district reports to determine appropriate instructional r>eeds. C. Both schools report referring to the school profile and quarterly district report to determine appropriate instructional needs. 01/03/94 04/01/94 10/01/93 01/03/94 08/24/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 03/30/94 06/30/94 12/31/93 03/30/94 09/30/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 403Page: 216 PrograM Seq f: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 PrograM Name: School Operations PrograM Code: PriMary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, GreRiillion and Anderson PrograM Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Mirfcer 1.3 L 45 13. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria D. Both schools report referring to the school profile and quarterly district report to determine appropriate instructional needs. Incentive Schools A. Two schools report that data relative to the five subjects is recorded in the Annual School Plan. Elementary Area Schools A. Eight schools report data relative to the above strategies is addressed in their School Profiles or Annual School Plan. B. Five schools report referring to the school profile and quarterly district reports to determine appropriate instructional needs. C. Sixteen schools report referring to the school profile and quarterly district report to determine appropriate instructional needs. D. Nineteen schools report referring to the school profile and quarterly district report to determine appropriate instructional needs. 1.3 Train staff to deal with data and iapleaentation of strategies Senior High Schools 04/01/94 08/24/93 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 July 1, 1993 06/30/94 09/30/93 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 Jwe 30, 1994 Educational Prograas
Planning, Research, and Evaluation (Principals, Staff Devlp.) 1.3 Outcoaes evaluations conducted on a coaperat ive basis 1.3 (Classroom monitoring will reflect teacher utilization of test data training and increased student achievement and participation) 224Page: 217 Program Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26. 1994 Program Name: School Operations Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Nuiber Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coiif>letion Date Responsibi lity Evaluation Criteria 13. (cont'd) A. One of the six high schools reported using classroom visits during the second quarter to train staff to deal with data and implementation of strategies. B. Staff at two of the six high schools have been trained the third quarter to deal with data and implementation strategies. C. Staff at two high schools have been trained the fourth quarter to deal with data and implementation of strategies. Ex: New Staff Member Inservice. Area Junior High Schools A. One of the six area junior high schools reported the training of staff to deal with data and implementation of strategies. B. One area junior high school reported activity relative to the training of staff to deal with data and implementation of strategies. For example, the school provided inservice to teachers by counselors. Elementary Area Magnet Schools A. One magnet school has received a Rockefeller school improvement grant to help train staff to deal with data and implementation of strategies. 6. Five schools reports the monitoring of teachers convnitments to effective instructional strategies. C. Five schools reports the monitoring of teachers commitments to effective instructional strategies. Elementary Interdistrict Magnet Schools 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 01/03/94 04/01/94 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 12/31/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 03/30/94 06/30/94 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94Page: 218 Prograai Seq f: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Prograai Maae: School Operations Prograai Code: Priaary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Prograai Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportmities for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Wmfeer 1,4 L 45 13. (contd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria A. One of the two interdistrict schools reports monitoring of teachers' commitments to effective instructional strategies. One school reports providing multicultural monitoring and providing ongoing staff development inservices. B. Both schools reports the monitoring of teacher conmitments to effective instructional strategies. Elementary Area Schools A. Five area schools report the monitoring of teachers' commitments to effective instructional strategies. B. Eighteen area schools reports the monitoring of teacher commitments to effective instructional strategies. C. Nineteen schools reports the monitoring of teacher commitments to effective instructional strategies. 1.4 Evaluation of outcomes of interventions via milestone reports and final yearly reports. 1.4 (Frequent monitoring of students progress through the use of interim reports, report cards, classroom assessments, and annual report) Senior High Schools A. Two high schools reviewed interim reports during September 1993. B. One of the six schools reported evaluating outcomes of interventions during the second quarter. 10/01/93 01/03/94 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 July 1. 1993 08/24/93 10/01/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 Jioe 30, 1994 09/30/93 12/31/93 Principal, School Staff, School laprovement Team 1.4 (Report will be used to make and implement reconnendations of corrected actions)Page: 219 Progran Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Progran Nane: School Operations Progran Code: Priiaary Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Progran Goal: The intent of the School Operations goat is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSD. Plan RefererKe Page Wtufcer Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria C. Two of the six high schools reportedly evaluations outcomes of interventions using milestone reports. 0. Two high schools reportedly evaluated outcomes of interventions using milestone reports. Ex: Assessment of Retention List of Students with failing grades. Area Junior High Schools A. Evaluation was conducted by two of the six junior high schools. B. Three area junior high schools evaluated outcomes of interventions via milestone reports and final yearly reports. Junior High Magnet Schools A. One magnet school reported using interim reports, report cards, classroom assessments, and annual report for evaluation of intervention outcomes. B. Two of the six schools reportedly evaluated intervention outcomes via milestone reports and final yearly reports. Example: Grade Distribution Report C. Milestone reports have been reviewed at both magnet junior high schools during the third quarter. Elementary Area Magnet Schools 13. (cont'd) A. Evaluation conducted by three schools. B. One magnet school reported quarterly reviews of grade distributions as milestone reports. C. Four schools report having a process to review an evaluate outcomes of interventions via reports. 01/03/94 04/01/94 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 03/30/94 06/30/94 03/30/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/30/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 A O (Page: 220 Prograai Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26. 1994 PrograM MaMe: School Operations Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportKiities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Wmfccr Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria D. Four schools report having a process to review an evaluate outcomes of interventions via reports. Elementary Interdistrict Magnet Schools A. Both schools report having interventions available as a result of all reports received concerning student progress. B. Both schools continue to review printed student/parent reports as they pertain to school objectives and goals. C. Both schools report having a process to review an evaluate outcomes of interventions via reports. D. Both schools report having a process to review an evaluate outcomes of interventions via reports. Incentive Schools A. Five schools report that the interim reports for parents have been used to report student successes and/or needs. Elementary Area Schools A. Eleven schools report that the interim reports for parents have been used to report student achievement and/or needs. B. Eight area schools report having a process to review and evaluate outcomes of interventions via reports. C. Twenty area schools report having a process to review and evaluate outcomes of interventions via reports. D. Twenty-three schools report having a process to review and evaluate outcomes of interventions via reports. /log 04/01/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94Page
221 PrograM Seq f: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Program Naate: School Operations Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goat: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportmities for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Himber 1.5 L 45 13. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1.5 Re-assessaient of and modification of objectives and strategies. Senior High Schools A. One of the six high schools reported the implementation of the Alternative Assessment Program as a modification based upon re-assessment. B. One high school reported the implementation of the alternative assessment program s a modification based upon re-assessment. Area Junior High Schools A. One of the six area junior high schools reported activity related to the re-assessment of and modification of objectives and strategies. B. The review of the annual plan and the continued review of C.O.E. strategies were used for re-assessment at two of the six junior high schools. C. Re-assessment of and modification of objectives/strategies reportedly occurred at two area junior high schools. Junior High Magnet Schools A. One of the two junior high magnet schools reported re-assessment of objectives has occurred as a monitoring tool. Elementary Area Magnet Schools A. Review COE July 1, 1993 01/03/94 04/01/94 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 01/03/94 08/24/93 Jiste 30, 1994 03/30/94 06/30/94 12/31/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 03/30/94 09/30/93 B. One school reports re-assessment and modification of strategies and objectives in monthly grade level meetings. 10/01/93 12/31/93 Assistant S(<}ts., Principals, Staffs 1.5 (Revise school improvement plan based upon quarterly assessment) A nqPage: 222 Prograa Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Prograai Nane: School Operations Prograai Code: Priaary Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportisiities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Nuiijer 1.6 L 45 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria C. Four schools report revising their school improvement plans as needed based on quarterly assessments. D. Four schools report revising their school improvement plans as needed based on quarterly assessments. Elementary Interdistrict Magnet Schools 01/03/94 04/01/94 03/31/94 06/30/94 13. (cont'd) A. Both schools report that modifications of their Annual School Plans will be ongoing as needed to meet the needs of their students. B. Both schools report revising their school improvement plans as needed based on quarterly assessments. C. Both schools report revising their school improvement plans as needed based on quarterly assessments. Elementary Area Schools A. Six schools report that based upon quarterly assessments, the Annual School Plan will be reviewed as needed. B. Six area schools report revising their schools' improvement plans as needed based on quarterly assessments. C. Fifteen schools report revising their school improvement plans as needed based on quarterly assessments. 0. Seventeen schools report revising their school inprovement plans as needed based on quarterly assessments. 1.6 Creation of final plan and strategies. Senior High Schools ^10 08/24/93 10/01/93 04/01/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 July 1, 1993 09/30/93 12/31/93 06/30/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 Jine 30, 1994 Principals, School StaffsPage: 223 Progran Seq f: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Progran Mane: School Operations Progran Code: Prinary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Progran Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportmities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Muitoer Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coay>letion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 13. (cont'd) A. Three high schools reported the creation of final plan and strategies. Area Junior High Schools A. One of the six area junior high schools reported activity toward the creation of final plan and strategies. B. Two area junior high schools reported the creation of final plan and strategies. Elementary Area Magnet Schools A. B. 04/01/94 10/01/93 04/01/94 06/30/94 12/31/93 06/30/94 COE in place at one school. One school reported its five-year COE plan has been accepted and approved. C. Four schools reported following recofmended strategies based on the school's annual improvement plan. 0. Three schools reported following recommended strategies based on the school's annual improvement plan. Elementary Interdistrict Magnet Schools A. Both interdistrict magnet schools reported following reconmended strategies based on the schools annual improvement plan. 6. Both schools reported following reconmended strategies based on the school's annual improvement plan. C. Both schools reported following reconmended strategies based on the school's annual improvement plan. Elementary Area Schools A. Six schools report submitting the Annual School Plan and revising strategies as necessary. 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 09/30/93Page: 224 Progran Seq f: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Program Name: School Operations Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportmities for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Nudier Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Cospletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria B. Three schools reported following reconvnended strategies based on the school's annual inprovement plan. C. Thirteen area schools reported following recommended strategies based on the school's annual improvement plan. 10/01/93 01/03/94 12/31/93 03/31/94 D. Sixteen area schools reported following recommended strategies based on the school's annual improvement plan. 04/0194 06/30/94 1.7 L 45 1.7 Annual assessment of outcomes of yearly plan. July 1, 1993 Jme 30, 1994 Deputy/Assoc. and Asst. Sipts., Principals, Staffs, School Improvement Team 1.7 Assessment process and reamdiation plans for areas in need of iaprovement 1.7 (Annual progress report) Senior High Schools A. Three high schools documented activities relative to the annual assessment of outcomes of the year plan. 04/01/94 06/30/94 Area Junior High Schools A. One of the six area junior high schools reported activity toward the annual assessment of outcomes of yearly plan. 10/01/93 12/31/93 B. One area junior high school reported activity relative to the annual assessment of outcomes of yearly plan. 04/01/94 06/30/94 Elementary Area Magnet Schools A. Refer to annual review. 08/24/93 09/30/93 B. Three Elementary magnet schools report providing feedback and other information significant to progress made to date. 04/01/94 06/30/94 Elementary Interdistrict Magnet Schools 4 10Page: 225 Program Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Program Name: School Operations Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Coal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Muiber Objectives Strategies Begiming Date Conpletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 13. (cont'd) A. Both interdistrict magnet schools report outlining student/staff accomplishment related to school goals. B. One school report providing feedback and other information significant to progress made to date. C. Both schools report providing feedback and other information significant to progress made to date. Elementary Area Schools A. Reflection of Annual Progress Report will show assessment of outcomes of yearly plans. B. Three area schools report providing feedback and other information significant to progress made to date. B. Seventeen schools reported providing feedback and other information significant to progress made to date. C. Ten schools report providing feedback and other information significant to progress made to date. 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 04/01/94 01/03/94 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 06/30/94 03/31/94 ^"3Progran Seq f: 09 Progran Nane: School Operations Progran Code: Program Coal: Plan Reference Page Nimber 14. Page 46 1. L 46 LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Primary Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportinities for all students in the LRSO. Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Page: 226 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 14. Provide staff developaent on an ongoing basis to staff and information to parents relative to student success. July 1. 1993 Jtfw 30. 1994 (Principal. Staff, Staff Development) 14. (List of nunbers and kinds of staff development activities provided and number of meetings or informtional sharing sessions held with parents) 1. To update skills of all district staff on a regular basis and to keep all staff abreast of developments in their field of endeavor. Senior High Schools A. Three of the six high schools reported staff development activities during the second quarter. B. Staff development inservices occurred at two of the six high schools to update the relative skills. C. Staff development inservices occurred at two schools during the fourth quarter to update the relative skills. Area Junior High Schools A. Two of the six area junior high schools reported activities toward the updating of skills of all staff and keeping staff aware of developments in their associative fields. B. Staff development activities were conducted at two of the six high schools. /II 4 July 1. 1993 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 10/01/93 01/03/94 Jww 30. 1994 12/31/93 03/30/94 06/30/94 12/31/93 03/30/94 (Principal, Staff, Staff Development) 1. Meet established guidelines of equity monitoring process 1. (Document the nud>er of inservice announcements made available to district staff and record the nunber of staff who participated)Page: 227 Program Seq f: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Program Name: School Operations Program Code: Primary Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Program Goal
The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Mmtoer Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Caaf>letion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria C. Three area junior high schools reportedly updated skills. Junior High Magnet Schools 04/01/94 06/30/94 14. (cont'd) A. One of the two magnet schools reported activity toward updating skills of staff and keeping staff aware of developments in their field of endeavor. B. Counseling sessions, counselor's meetings, and inservices are techniques used to update skills at both magnet junior high schools. Elementary Area Magnet Schools A. Staff development inservices conducted at three schools. B. One school reported that curriculun specialist registered for thirteen LRSO inservice sessions in an effort to keep all staff abreast of developments in their field of endeavors. C. Five schools reports that staff persons are updated on a regular basis relative to development in their field of endeavor. 0. four schools reports that staff persons are updated on a regular basis relative to development in their field of endeavor. Elementary Interdistrict Magnet Schools A. Both schools report having distributed staff development catalogues to their teachers to keep them abreast of current inservices. 10/01/93 01/03/94 08/24/93 10/01/93 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 12/31/93 03/30/94 09/30/93 12/31/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 ^^5Page: 228 Progran Seq f: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Progran Mane: School Operations Progran Code: Prinary Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, Gremillion and Anderson Progran Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportmities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Huifcer Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria B, Both schools report communicating vision of school effectiveness through written communiques, PTA meetings, etc. 10/01/93 12/31/93 14. (cont'd) C. Both schools reports that staff persons are updated on a regular basis relative to development in their field of endeavor. D. Both schools reports that staff persons are updated on a regular basis relative to development in their field of endeavor. Incentive Schools A. Three incentive schools report having a pre-school staff meeting and a September staff meeting to keep all staff abreast of developments. 01/03/94 04/01/94 08/24/93 03/31/94 06/30/94 09/30/93 Elementary Area Schools A. Eight schools report having activities designed to update skills of staff on a regular basis. Examples: Faculty meetings, monthly foruns, quarterly summaries, staff development workshops, etc. 08/24/93 09/30/93 B. Nine schools reported that skills of all district are updated as follows: 1. Records kept on staff development participation. 2. Staff development catalogues are distributed. 3. Staff sharing professional articles in monthly meetings. 4. Post staff development announcements. C. Nineteen schools reports that staff persons are updated on a regular basis relative to development in their field of endeavor. 10/01/93 01/03/94 12/31/93 03/31/94 /nrPage: 229 Prograa Seq *: 09 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Prograa Naae: School Operations Prograa Code: Priaary Leader: Estelle Matthis Secondary Leader: Robertson, GremiUion and Anderson Prograa Goal: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportuiities for all students in the LRSO. Plan Reference Page Huiber 1.1 L 46 1.2 L 46 1.3 L 46 14. (cont'd) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Coapletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria D. Nineteen schools reports that staff persons are updated on a regular basis relative to development in their field of endeavor. 1.1 Provide selections of staff developaent opportinities for individual staff and entire faculties to include but not liait to: a. TESA b. PET c. Classrooa Hanageaent d. School Manageaient 1.2 Send selected staff to professional developaent sessions in order to increase the nmber of available trainers and. in return, for a coaaitment to assist with collegial staff developaent. 1.3 Provide district-wide prograas of staff developaent 04/01/94 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 July 1, 1993 06/30/94 Jine 30, 1994 Jine 30. 1994 Jine 30. 1994 Associate Sipt.-- Educational Prograas. Assistant Sipts.. Staff Devlp. Director. State Dept, of Educ. Assoc. Si^Jt.-- Educ. Prograas. Asst. Supts.. Staff Devlp. Director. State Departaent of Education Staff Devlp. 1.1 Provision of staff development Evidence of enhanced classrooa instruction with iaproved student perfonaances 1.2 (Conpare and access the nunber of available trainers as a result of the staff development sessions) 1.3 (Record nunber of participants and kind of staff development programs offered) A 1Program Seq *: 09 Program Name: School Operations Program Code: Program Goal: Plan Reference Page Member 15. L 47 1. L 47 1.1. L 47 LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET 1X)CUMENT Primary Leader: Estelle Hatthis Secondary Leader: The intent of the School Operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSO. Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Conpletion Date Page: 230 Revision Date: July 26, 1994 Robertson, GreffliUion and Anderson Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 15. To collaborate with PCSSO and NLRSD in regard to aspects of the plan which will facilitate and enhance desegregation efforts. 1. To create a collaboration whereby all students in all schools in the three districts (LR, NLR, and PC) will benefit from a mutual set of beliefs and expectations for success for all students and equity for all students and staff. 1.1 Contained in the "Inter-district Desegregation Plan." July 1, 1993 See Inter- district Plan Jine 30, 1994 See Interdistrict Plan (Superintendents and staff from the three districts) LRSO Deseg, Dept. (Delete Deseg. Dept.) (Assoc. Supt. for Desegregation) Si^aerintendents and staff of three districts 15. (Record of the number and kind of collaborative meetings held by the parties) 1. (Evidence of successful implementation of collaborative plans) 1.1 Successful 'R>1ementation of collaborative plan. Positive, measurable outcomes for students, staff, and the three districts in areas addressed ^^8LRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Program Seq #: 09B Page: 1 Revision Date: August 6, 1994 Program Name: School Operations Program Code: Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Ui Iliams Secondary Leader: Central Office Administrators Program Description: School Operations includes the total integrated learning experiences which meet the academic, social, and developmental needs of all LRSD students in a desegregated educational setting. Central Office staff and principals of the schools collaborate to ensure quality educational program planning for all students with the support of staff, parents, and the larger community. District Goal Support: Program Goal: Plan References: FY Program Budget: YTD Expenditures: General cooperation among the Pulaski County districts is necessary. ourselves to the following programs and services in the districts
Underlying principles will include
A collaborative effort is crucial to the success of this countywide desegregation plan. Ue conwiit All students will be accorded equal opportunity te participate in all academic and extracurricular or race
all students, school plans and goals
____________________all district staff and parents will develop and model high expectations for the success of all students without regard to gender all staff and all parents will have equitable access to and input into programs, school and district activities, planning and implementation of special efforts will be concentrated on increasing parental involvement in the schools
needs for contact with minority teachers and a diversity in the racial makeup of support staffs consistent with applicable law
staffing and staff recruitment will reflect student equitable basis
policies directed toward students will reflect an awareness of diversity in the student population, providing for an orderly, supportive learning environment. staff assignments will be made on an its background and learning styles, while also Create a col loboration whereby all students in all schools in the three districts (LR. MLR, and PCSSO) will benefit from a mutual set of beliefs and expectations for success for all students and equity for all students and staff Follow Interdistrict Desegregation Plan. Ensure that equity occurs in all phases of school activities and operations. The intent of the school operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSD. L 30--L 47 1st Qtr Expend: 2nd Qtr Expend: 3rd Qtr Expend: 4th Qtr Expend: FTE [ Related Function Codes: 1 gLRSD FY 93-94 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Page: 2 Program Seq #: 09B Revision Date: August 6, 1994 Program Name: School Operations Program Code: Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: Central Office Administrators Program Goal: The intent of the school operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1. Page 30 1. To ensure an organizational structure which provides equal opportunity and access for parents, students and staff. Principals,, Assistant Supts., Assoc. Supt.) 1. (Sufficient program personnel are in place to meet the needs of all students in the program as measured by the monitoring instrument) 1. To review organizational structure in schools and central office to ensure sufficient support for students and staff success and for the implementation of the desegregation plan. Assistant Superintendent (Robertson) A. Review all building and classroom schedules. (This activity was initiated 07/01/94 and a completion date of 03/31/94 is docimented for the third reporting period.) B. Review all personnel changes. (This activity was initiated 07/01/93 and 75X completion was reported the end of the third quarter.) C. Review ADE reports. (This activity was introduced 07/01/93 and a 75X completion was reported 03/31/94.) documented.} D. Reviewed all building and classroom schedules, all personnel changes, and ADE reports. (This activity was initiated 07/01/93 and was completed at the end of the fourth quarter.) Assistant Superintendent (Gremillion) A. Correspondence was sent to all nineteen schools outlying expectations for the schools in submitting their annual school plans in August, 1993. 01/03/94 01/03/94 01/03/94 04/01/94 01/03/94 03/31/94 03/31/94 03/31/94 06/30/94 03/31/94 4 OPage: 3 Program Seq #: 09B Revision Date: August 6, 1994 Program Name: School Operations Program Code: Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: Central Office Administrators Program Goal: The intent of the school operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Number 1.1 Page 30 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria B. Review annual school plan of all nine- teen elementary schools in October, 1993. C. Critiqued each plan and recorded on a form the evidence of goals addressed, test scores safety plans, and recommendations for change needed if any. < occurred in October, 1993.) (Achievement D. Pre-school on-site visits were made on an on-going basis to ensure readiness and preparation in August, 1993. E. On-site visits, observations, and conferences with principals were ongoing. (The achievement reportedly occurred 08/93-06/30/94.) Assistant Superintendent (Anderson) A. Review master schedules of all secondary schools.(Item initiated and completed 07/93-09/30/93.) B. Review all personnel changes. (Activity was initiated 07/93 with 75X completion reported at the end of the third quarter.) C. Review ADE certification reports. (Item completed 10/93-03/31/94.) D. Review Annual Reports 1.1 Appoint school-based biracial committees to monitor implementation and data. (Report to faculty) Assistant Superintendent (Robertson) 01/03/94 01/03/94 04/01/94 01/03/94 01/03/94 01/03/94 04/01/94 07/01/93 03/31/94 03/31/94 06/30/94 03/31/94 03/31/94 03/31/94 06/30/94 06/30/94 Principals. Assistant Supts. 1. (Satisfactory compliance with the Education Equity Monitoring Document) 1.1 Survey of staff patrons 1.1 School-level documentation of quarterly meetings (minutes, rosters)Page: 4 Program Seq #: 09B Revision Date: August 6, 1994 Program Name: School Operations Program Code: Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: Central Office Administrators Program Goal: The intent of the school operations goal is to provide equitable educational opportunities for all students in the LRSD. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria A. School Biracial Committees established. (Activity started 07/01/93 and completed 12/31/93.) B. Review reports of convnittee formation and committee activities. (Activity convnenced 07/01/93 and 75X completion was reported at the end of the third quarter.) C. Review reports of convnittee formation and convnittee activities. (Activity convnenced 07/01/93 and 100X completion occurred at the end of the fouth quarter.) Assistant Superintendent (Gremillion) A. Review of school profiles to monitor the establishment of the Biracial Convnittee. (The achievement was introduced 10/93 and 75X was reported the end of the third quarter.) B. All schools reported the impleroentaiton and monitoring of their biracial teams. (The achievement reported started 10/93 and was completed 06/30/94.) Assistant Superintendent (Anderson) A. School Biracial Convnittees established. (Item executed 7/93-10/93.) B. Review reports of committee formation and convnittee activities. (Item initiated 10/93 with 75% completion at the end of the third quarter.) 1.2 A district-wide biracial committee will monitor district-wide desegregation efforts and data and (report to Board) Associate Supt. of Desegregation /I no 01/03/94 01/03/94 04/01/94 01/03/94 04/01/94 01/03/94 01/03/94 01/01/93 03/31/94 03/31/94 06/30/94 03/31/94 06/30/94 03/31/94 03/
This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.

<dcterms_creator>Little Rock School District</dcterms_creator>