{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_296","title":"Compliance hearing exhibits, 97-116","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1998/2001"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Educational law and legislation","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics"],"dcterms_title":["Compliance hearing exhibits, 97-116"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/296"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["exhibition (associated concept)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nExhibit No. 97: LI230-90 Memos from Dr. Watson re: behavioral report deficiencies. ALITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 OFFICE OF STUDENT HEARING TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Dr. Linda Watson, Assistant Superintendent Student Discipline Behavio^ Report Deficiencies DATE: Your l^avior Report(s) sent to the Student Hearing Office __dated__ 'arding 'the following deficiencies: Insufficient evidence to support recommendation Administrative Codes are absent or incomplete Due Process Hearing Section incomplete Parent Report Section incomplete Building principals signature missing Report was not received in the Student Hearing Office within the time frame prescribed in the Little Rock School District SRRH Student information Section I incomplete Other Comment/Disposition Please note the disposition and/or deficiencies identified above and return the corrected Behavior Report form immediately to the Student Hearing Office. Attachments(s) C: Associate Superintendent Assistant Superintendent lTSON, LINDA rrom: Sent\nro: Subject\nWATSON, LINDA Monday, June 04, 2001 1\n17 PM PHILLIPS, TABITHA Long-term suspensions Mrs. Phillips\nI am reading 5/11/01 and the student may return - -ion 1 noticed that the suspension began on 5/i /u losnua n. u\u0026lt;=y'=' may issue short-term suspensions for 10 day y , which violates taw. P nf the Board of Directors. A memo was - A .4 A ic an nd reouires a vote of the Boa Anmmo states that anythmg^^ovei^^10 days s a Joshua R. Degter's suspension. short-term suspensions today, 6/04/01 State Law sent out earlier this year which stated that principals may expulsion and requires not suspend students for more than 10 days without it coming to my office. unless you send it through as a long-term suspension 1TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 October 28, 1998 Mary Menking, Principal Williams Elementary Magnet School Linda Watson\nAss!stant Superintendent Student Discipline Deficient Behavior Report On October 23, 1998, the Student Hearing Office received a Behavior Report from Williams Elementary Magnet School, dated October 22, 1998, recommending that Alex Martin be expelled. The Behavior Report did not have information marked in the Due Process Hearing section. Please complete this section and return to Student Hearing. If you have questions, feel free to contact me.TO: FROM\nSUBJECT: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 October 28, 1998 Lionel Ward, Principal Garland Elementary School Linda WatsonjAssistant Superintendent Student Discipline Deficient Behavior Report On October 28, 1998, the Student Hearing Office received a Behavior Report from Garland Elementary School, dated October 27, 1998, recommending that Doncurian Ely be expelled. The Behavior Report did not have information marked in the Due Process Hearing and Administrative Action sections. Please complete these sections and return to Student Hearing. If you have questions, feel free to contact me.TO: FROM\nSUBJECT\nLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 October 28,1998 Vernon Smith, Principal Forest Heights Junior High School 0- 4U-' . Linda Watsotv Assistant Supenntendent Student Discipline Deficient Behavior Report On October 26, 1998, the Student Hearing Office received a Behavior Report from Forest Heights Junior High School, dated October 20, 1998, recommending that Brandon Mobley be expelled. The Behavior Report did not have information marked in the Due Process Hearing section. Mr. Smith was this student given due process? If so, please complete this section and return to Student Hearing. If this student was not given due process, he will be returned to Forest Heights. If you have questions, feel free to contact me.ir P.W/117 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MaRKHAM STREET LITTLEROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 huv - OFFICE OF STUDENT HEARING TO: FROM: Dr. Linda Wats6?^, Assistant Superintendent Student Discipline Assistant Superintendent subject\n: DATE: Beha^r Report Deficiencies / 7, ' y*' o the Student Hearing Office . xX, ( M _______ ^dated has the following deficiencies: lice Mg:yarding t Insuflicient evidence to support recommendation Administrative Codes are absent or incomplete Due Process Rearing Section iacomptete Parent Report Section incomplete Building principals signature missing Report was not received In the Student Hearing Office within the time frame prescribed in the Little Rock School District SRRH Student Information Section I incomplete Other Comment/Disposition Please note the disposition and/or deficiencies identified above and return the corrected Behavior Report form Immediately to the Student Hearing Office, Attaclimen(s(s) C\nAssociate Superintendent Assistant Superintendent LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 TO:. zpmCEOEST ENT HEARING FROM: SUBJECT: Dr. Linda Watson, Assistant Superintendent Student Discipline Behayior Report Deficiencies DATE: I' our behavio/Report^) sent to the Student Hearing Offic^eMi Your behavio] xding hasTEe following deficiencies: / Insufficient evidence to support recommendation Administrative Codes are absent or incomplete u- Due Process Hearing Section incomplete Parent Report Section incomplete Building principals signature missing Report was not received in the Student Hearing Office within the time frame prescribed in the Little Rock School District SRRH Student information Section I incomplete Other Comment/Disposition Please note the disposition and/or deficiencies identified above and return the corrected Behavior Report form immediately to the Student Hearing Office. Attachments(s) C: Associate Superintendent Assistant SuperintendentTO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLEROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 OFFICE OF STUDENT HEARING UtMLLUr ------------- - . hr. Linda Wats^M-ssistant Superintendent Student Discipline Behavior Report Deficiencies the Student Hearing Office bearding dated ice rgi h?s the following deficiencies: Insufficient evidence to support recommendation Administrative Codes are absent or incomplete Due Process Hearing Section incomplete Parent Report Section incomplete Building principals signature missing Report was not received in the Student Hearing frame prescribed in the Little Rock School District SRRH Student information Section I incomplete Other Comment/Disposition Ple.s. te the disposition and/or dendencies Identined aboveand retnrn the corrected Behavior Report term immedlalel, to the Student Hearing Office. Attachments(s) C: Associate Superintendent Assistant SuperintendentLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLEROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 OFFICE ORSTUDENT HEARING TO: FROM: Dr. Linda Wats^, Assistant Superintendent Student Discipline SUBJECT: DATE: Beha^or Report Deficiencies 4^ / Your behavior .6' sVsent to dated haS^he following deficiencies: Insufficient evidence to support recommendation Administrative Codes are absent or incomplete Due Process Hearing Section incomplete Parent Report Section incomplete Building principals signature missing Report was not received in the Student Hearing Office vdthin the time frame prescribed in the Little Rock School District SRRH Student information Section I incomplete Other Comment/Disposition Please note the disposition and/or deficiencies identified above and retnrn the corrected Savl Report form Immediately to the Student Hearing Office. Attachments(s) C: Associate Superintendent Assistant Superintendent LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: OFFICE OF STUDENT HEARING Dr. Linda WatsMf,%sisttht Superintendent Student Discipline Behavior Report Deficiencies DATE: Your behaviorReport(^seiU'^thi A ! S-4- lias the following deficiencies: le Student Hearing Office/regarding dated Insufficient evidence to support recommendation Administrative Codes are absent or incomplete Due Process Hearing Section incomplete Parent Report Section incomplete Building principals signature missing Report was not ir ece-i-v-e--d-- -i-n-- t-h--e-- -S--t udent Hearin-g O. ffice within the time otidu frame prescribed in the Little Rock School District SRRH. Student information Section I incomplete Other Comment/Disposition Please note the disposition and/or deficiencies identified above and return the corrected Behavior Report form immediately to the Student Hearing Office. Attachments(s) C: Associate Superintendent TO: FROM: Dr. Lind: SUBJECT\nDATE: little rock SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 OFFICE OF STUDENT HEARING Student Discipline 7 Assistant^perintendent Behavior Report Deficiencies /X /Z n 4-n behavior Re^(^ sent to the Student Yo^ behavior Report(s) sent to t has the following deficiencies: Insufficient evidence to support recommendation Administrative Codes are absent or incomplete Due Process Hearing Section incomplete Parent Report Section incomplete Building principals signature missing Report was not received in the Student Hearing Office within the time frame prescribed in the Little Rock School District SRRH Student information Section I incomplete Other Comment/Disposition Please note the disposition and/or deficiencies identified above and return the corrected Behavior Report form immediately to the Student Hearing Office. Attachments(s) C: Associate Superintendent Assistant SuperintendentLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 OFFICE OF STUDENT HEARING TO: FROM: Dr. Linda Watson, Assistant Superintendent Student Discipline SUBJECT: Bieehhaayvjtoerr Report DDeeffiicciieenncciiee:s DATE: )U/behaviB^Mort(s) s - .eort(sent to the Student Hearing Office r\u0026amp; has the following deficiencies: di dated ! ree^djng^ n/ iqjSp Insufficient evidence to support recommendation Administrative Codes are absent or incomplete Due Process Hearing Section incomplete Parent Report Section incomplete Building principals signature missing Report was not received in the Student Hearing Office within the time frame prescribed in the Little Rock School District SRRH Student information Section I incomplete Other Comment/Disposition Please note the disposition and/or deficiencies identified above and return the corrected Behavior Report form immediately to the Student Hearing Office. Attachments(s) C: Associate Superintendent Assistant Superintendent LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET little rock, ARKANSAS 72201 FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: OFFICE OF STUDENT HEARING Dr. Linda Watson, Assistant Superintendent Student Discipline BehayiM Report Deficiencies l\"^:!I . _ X7aot Your behayior Repprt(s) sent to the Student Hearing Office regarding dated_______ TO: \" the following deficiencies: Insufficient evidence to support recommendation Administrative Codes are absent or incomplete Due Process Hearing Section incomplete Parent Report Section incomplete Building principals signature missing Report was not received in the Student Hearing O^^ the time frame prescribed in the Little Rock School District SRRH Student information Section I incomplete Other Comment/Disposition Please--------- . Behavior Report form immediately to Attachments(s) C: Associate Superintendent Assistant SuperintendentTO: FROM\nDr. Linda SUBJECT\nDATE: little rock school distwct 810 WEST MARKHAM ST^ET little rock, ARKANSAS 72201 OFFICE OF STUDENT HEARING atson, Assistant Superintendent Student DiscipUne\ne regarding __dated ,the Student Hearing Office ha: le following deficiencies: Insufficient evidence to support recommendation Administrative Codes are absent or incomplete Due Process Hearing Section incomplete Parent Report Section incomplete Building principals signature missing not received in the Student Hearing Report was frame prescribed in the Little Rock School District SRRH Office within the time Student information Section I incomplete Other Conunent/Disposition Please note the disposition and/or deficiencies identified above and return the corrected Behavior Report form immediately to the Student Hearing Office. Attachments(s) C: Associate Superintendent Assistant Superintendent TO\nFROM: SUBJECT: DATE: little ROCK SC HOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 F STUDENT HEARING Dr. Linda Watson, Assistant Superintendent Student Discipline Behaviw Report Deficiencies 'the following deficiencies: 5 Insufficient evidence to support recommendation Administrative Codes are absent or incomplete Due Process Hearing Section incomplete Parent Report Section incomplete Building principals signature missing Report was not received in the Student Hearing frame prescribed in the Little Rock School District SRRH Student information Section I incomplete Other Comment/Disposition Please note the disposition and/or deficiencies ies identified above and return the corrected Behavior Report lauuaivtMM ---------------- . form immediately to the Student Hearing Office. Attachments(s) C\nAssociate Superintendent Assistant Superintendent LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 TO: OFFICE OF STUDENT HEARING FROM: SUBJECT: Dr. Linda Watson, Assistant Superintendent Student Discipline Behavior Report Deficiencies DATE: Yourr behaviorRepprt(s) the Allowing deficienci ,rt(s)/ent to the Student Hearing :he following deficiencies: Insufficient evidence to support recommendation Administrative Codes are absent or incomplete Due Process Hearing Section incomplete Parent Report Section incomplete Building principals signature missing Report was not received in the Student Hearing Office within the time frame prescribed in the Little Rock School District SRRH Student information Section I incomplete Other Comment/Disposition Please note Ihe dlspositlo. and/or derieiencles Identilied above and return the corrected rlvdbv UUlV V**V --------------- Behavior Report form immediately to the Student Hearing Office. Attachments(s) C: Associate Superintendent Assistant Superintendent little rock school ^strict 810 WWEESSTT MMAAKRiKsH-nA/vMi SoT. REET. little rock, ARKANSAS 72201 OFFICE OF STUDENT HEARING TO: FROM: Dr. Linda a^ats^,Assistant Superintendent SUBJECT: Student Discipline Behavior Report Deficiencies DATE: Your behayi it Hearing Offij dated ji4g the following Insufficient evidence to support recommendation Administrative Codes are absent or incomplete Due Process Hearing Section incomplete Parent Report Section incomplete Building principals signature missing Report was frame prescribed not received in the Student Hearing ,he Little Rock School Dktnct SRRH Office within the time Student information Section I incomplete Other^______ _ Comment/Disposition SiXoSX\" and return the corrected Attachments(s) C: Associate Superintendent Assistant Superintendent 1 I1 little rock school district 810 west MARKHAM STREET LITTLEROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: son, Assis nt Superintendent Student Discipline OFFIICCE,^F STUDENT HEARING Behavi^Report Deficiencies l/ . . . . H Your behavioiRepqrtj^sent to the Student Hearing Office dated TO: , Wthe followirig deficiencies: Insufficient evidence to support recommendation Administrative Codes are absent or incomplete Due Process Hearing Section incomplete Parent Report Section incomplete Building principals signature missing 1 lu .be Student Hearing Office within the time Little Rock School District SRRH Report was not received in the frame prescribed in the 1-------- Student information Section I incomplete Other Comment/Disposition Please note the disposition and/or deficiencies identified above and return the corrected Behavior Report form immediately to the Student Hearing Office. Attachments(s) C: Associate Superintendent Assistant Superintendent TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: little rock SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 OFFICE OF STUDENT HEARING I Dr. Linda Watsbfa', Assistant i Student Discipline Behavior Report Deficiencies Your behavior Report(s) sent to has the following deficiencies: the Student Hearing Office regarding dated______ Insufficient evidence to support recommendation Administrative Codes are absent or incomplete Due Process Hearing Section incomplete Parent Report Section incomplete Building principals signature missing Report no. received 1. .he SWden. Hewing *\u0026gt; frame prescribed in .he Link Rock School D.s.r.c. SRRH Student information Section I incomplete Other_____ Comment/Disposition Behavior Report form immediately to Attachments(s) C: Associate Superintendent Assistant Superintendent TO: FROM: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLEROCK, .ARKANSAS 72201 OFFICEJQF STUDENT HEARING Watson, Student Discipline Assistant Superintendent SUBJECTBehavi^Report Deficiencies DATE: Your behavioxJRepi sent to the Student Hearing Office. dated jM)\u0026lt;the following Insufficient evidence to support recommendation Administrative Codes are absent or incomplete Due Process Hearing Section incomplete Parent Report Section incomplete i v *. *XW**w*i-**'^- Building principals signature missing Report was not received in the Student Hearing Office within the time fra*m e prescribed in the Little Rock 1 Sch1 ool DistriCc'tT JS'DRTJRH Student information Section I incomplete Other Comment/Disposition Please note the disposition and/or deficiencies identified above and return the corrected Behavior Report form immediately to the Student Hearing Office. Attachments(s) C: Associate Superintendent Assistant Superintendent I i. Cj-\u0026gt;y-- LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLEROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 Ar- Q 4i f OFFICE ORSTUDENT HEARING TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: Dr. Linda Watsi Student Discipline ^,Assistant Superintendent Behauor Report Deficiencies 4x liii Your beha-vior haS^he foUo-wing Insufficient evidence to support recommendation Administrative Codes are absent or incomplete Due Process Hearing Section incomplete Parent Report Section incomplete Building principals signature missing Report was not received in the Student Hearing Office within the time frame prescribed in the Little Rock School District SRRH Student information Section I incomplete Other Comment/Disposition Please note the disposition and/or deficiencies identified above and return the corrected Behavior Report form immediately to the Student Hearing Office. Attachments(s) C: Associate Superintendent Assistant Superintendent LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLEROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: OFnCE OF STUDENT HEARING Dr. Linda Watson, Assistant Superintendent Student Discipline BBeehhaavviiowr RReeppoorrtt Dueeifiicciieenncciieess Cr'S#ir Ill n r r* UCs. 0 I ^8 r *' DATE: Your behavior Reppr^sent to the Student Hearing Office regarding // dated--------------------- the following deficiencies: Insufficient evidence to support recommendation Administrative Codes are absent or incomplete Due Process Hearing Section incomplete Parent Report Section incomplete Building principals signature missing Report was not received in the Student Hearing Office within the time frame prescribed in the Little Rock School District SRRH Student information Section I incomplete Other Comment/Disposition Please note the disposition and/or deficiencies identified above and return the corrected Behavior Report form immediately to the Student Hearing Office. Attachments(s) C: Associate Superintendent Assistant Superintendent NOV 2 4 1998 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 1 a ! (' t OFnCE OF STUDENT HEARING TO: FROM: Dr. Linda Watson, Assistant Superintendent Student Discipline SUBJECT: lehavlor Report Deficiencies DATE: Yourr behavior^eDprt(s) th^ollowing deficienci ,rt(s)2ent to the Student Hearing ihe tollowing deficiencies: Insufficient evidence to support recommendation Administrative Codes are absent or incomplete Due Process Hearing Section incomplete Parent Report Section incomplete Building principals signature missing Report was not received in the Student Hearing Office within the time frame prescribed in the Little Rock School District SRRH Student information Section I incomplete Other Comment/Disposition Please note the disposition and/or deficiencies identified above and return the corrected Behavior Report form immediately to the Student Hearing Office. Attachments(s) C: Associate Superintendent Assistant Superintendent Exhibit No. 98\nDiscipline reports used by Dr. Watson in conferencing with Hall High School. LI230-90 IDML008R2 Date: 1/09/01 School 002 HALL Dlsclplina Management System Action Summary Report 2000/08/21 2001/01/05 Page 1 11:53 AM hr, (\ng ?. fK' ACTION: PC PARENT CALLED Sch 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 Student __________ ____________ 930025 AMOS, CANDICE M^ 915665 BROWN, ERIC K. 923993 BRCWN, FRANKLIN J. 974900 CARROLL, KENNEIH W. 921026 CATO, WHITNEY J. 933666 CLAYBORNE, THOMAS W. 92B852 COATS, ARCHIE M. 927165 CYRUS, TERRELL C. 919723 DAVIS, JEFF. 919723 DAVIS, JEFF. 915910 DONAHUE, JESSICA M. 928810 DULANEY, VAMON. 930261 GREEN, CHRISTOPHE B. 916573 HARRIS, MICHAEL D. 923794 JAMES, QUINTON T, 992375 JOHNSON, EARVIN B. 919336 JOHNSON, TAURUS T. 922193 JONES, COREY D. 933051 JONES, SHANELLE L. 933051 JONES, SHANELLE L. 894448 LOWE, CORNELL D. 922360 MARSHALL, KENDALL E. 987741 MCMILLON, CHASE R. 919855 MORRIS, THURLON. 933035 MORTON, BRIAN E. 960701 NORRIS, LATOYA R. 919843 NOWDEN, SHAKITA. 908102 PATTON, MICHAEL C. PERRY, JASON L. PETERS, LATISHA S. 926747 TRUMBLE, STUART S. 935480 USSERY, BRYAN O. 962849 WADE, BRANDI L. 916864 WALKER, GERALD D. 929131 WILLIAMS, BRANDY L. 938569 WILLIAMS, CURTIS L. Data 9/12/00 9/21/00 10/27/00 9/18/00 11/08/00 9/14/00 8/29/00 9/21/00 10/27/00 12/07/00 9/22/00 9/12/00 9/19/00 8/28/00 8/29/00 9/01/00 8/24/00 12/04/00 9/08/00 9/22/00 8/30/00 9/12/00 9/14/00 11/10/00 9/15/00 9/12/00 11/08/00 8/29/00 11/08/00 9/12/00 9/28/00 10/25/00 11/09/00 12/04/00 12/11/00 9/13/00 9/12/00 Cl 09 10 09 09 12 09 09 09 09 09 12 09 09 12 10 12 12 10 09 09 11 09 12 12 09 09 12 12 12 12 09 09 09 10 09- 09 09 Eth 02 02 02 02 01 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 01 02 02 02 Sex F M M M F M M M M M F M M M M M M M F F M M M M M F F M M F M M F M In fraction________ _________ _- 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT 0 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLCW RULES OR DIR 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1070 REFUSE TO OBEY BUS RULES/REGUL 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW ROLES OR DIR 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OB DIRECT 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIB 1050 LEFT 02----- F 02 02 F M ACTION: PF PARENT CONFERENCE SCHCKHi/CLASS WITHOlfT PERM 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLCW RULES OR DIR 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLCW RULES OR DIR 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 1062 REFUSE-TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY BULES OR DIRECT Inf Pate 9/08/00 9/15/00 10/10/00 9/14/00 11/08/00 9/12/00 8/29/00 9/13/00 10/27/00 12/01/00 9/22/00 8/31/00 9/19/00 8/28/00 8/29/00 9/01/00 8/24/00 12/01/00 9/07/00 9/22/00 8/29/00 9/08/00 9/14/00 11/10/00 9/12/00 9/08/00 11/08/00 8/29/00 11/08/00 9/12/00 9/25/00 10/25/00 11/09/00 12/01/00 12/07/00 9/08/00 9/08/00 //yo t Sch 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 Studant___________________ ___ 969383 ALBA, RAMON. 917218 EASON, KATRINA L. 926278 HALL, CORMELLA L. 916418 PAYNE, JOHN W. 918947 PETTUS, TERRILYN. 959550 POWELL, WALTER. 924679 REED, ANGELA R. 910466 BOUSE, TYRELL E. 917395 TUCKER, KDURTNEY C. Date 12/04/00 9/11/00 8/30/00 10/05/00 12/05/00 8/29/00 9/11/00 10/02/00 11/20/00 Cl 09 12 10 12 12 12 10 12 12 Eth 03 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 Infraction ii 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1110 USE OF VERBAL ABUSE/FIGHTING W F F M F M F M M 3072 VERBAL ABUSE OF STAFF 1070 REFUSE TO OBEY BUS RULES/REGUL 1040 BEHAVIOR THAT VIOLATES A PERSO 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLCW RULES OR DIR 1110 USE OF VERBAL ABUSE/FIGHPING W 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLCW RULES OR DIR Inf Date 12/04/00 9/11/00 8/30/00 10/05/00 12/05/00 8/29/00 9/11/00 10/02/00 11/20/00 // DML008R2 Date: 1/09/01 School 002 HALL Discipline Management Systran Action Sunmary Report 2000/08/21 2001/01/05 Page 2 11:53 AM ACTION: SW STUDENT WARNED Sch 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 Student _______ ___________ 979010 ABDO, JON I. 974579 H,-0TAIBI, TUKKI T. 918699 ALEXAMDER, DERRICK D. 926887 ALLISON, CRYSTAL N. 936556 ANDERSON, JULIA M. 927271 ANDERSON, THEODIS. 922422 ANGLIN, ANTHONY D. 917188 ANTHONY, TAMMI D. 965739 ARNOLD, ANGELA M. 965739 ARNOLD, ANGELA M. 929840 ATKINSON, SHAKERRA L. 928073 AUSTIN, SHAKANA M. 928751 BEAVERS, CORTE L. 928906 BEULAH, RONNIE E. 928080 BLUEFER, SABRENDIA L. 928080 BLUEFER, SABRENDIA L. 935386 BRCWN, AMY Y. 929347 BROWN, BENJAMIN D. 927231 BROWN, ERIC L. 927231 BRCWN, ERIC L. 923993 BRCWN, FRANKLIN J. 923993 BRCWN, FRANKLIN J. 937002 BROWN, TANISHA R. 911925 BRYANT, ALEX C. 929848 BUCKNER, CEDRIC R. 933200 BUFORD, SHAUNICE L. 927878 BURSE, TONY D. 935483 CARTER, ARRIN T. 92BB52 COATS, ARCHIE H. 002- 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 922465 CRUTCHFIELD, SHANKA L. 927165 CYRUS, TERRELL C. 933180 DAVIS, NIKKI T. 300226 DAVIS, SHAUNTE. 932736 DIXON, ASHLEY N. 916444 DOSS, KENNETH W. 935451 DOWTHARD, ERNEST. 929843 DUHART, ALLYNNCIA S. 922858 DUHART, COURTNEY D. 928810 DULANEY, VAMON. 917218 EASON, KATRINA L. 935320 EVANS, ALICIA W. 923617 GILES, TYRONE D. 927578 GOODMAN, KEISHA N. 927578 GOODMAN, KEISHA N. 927576 GOODMAN, KEITH D. 927576 GOODMAN, KEITH D. 928297 GRAY, JENNIFER D. 992603 GREEN, TAKISHA S. 929523 GREENE, TRUDRELL L. 928418 GRIFFIN, LARON L. 921517 HADLEY, CHAUNCEY R. Date 10/16/00 9/07/00 9/18/00 1/05/01 12/06/00 9/20/00 11/16/00 9/12/00 9/05/00 9/08/00 12/05/00 9/07/00 9/11/00 9/14/00 9/19/00 1/05/01 12/07/00 9/19/00 9/01/00 10/25/00 8/29/00 12/07/00 9/22/00 12/01/00 8/30/00 9/11/00 10/05/00 9/07/00 11/21/00 10/30/00 8/29/00 12/07/00 12/05/00 10/26/00 11/09/00 10/17/00 10/06/00 9/01/00 9/18/00 9/01/00 9/20/00 11/16/00 9/12/00 11/06/00 8/31/00 9/12/00 10/24/00 11/20/00 9/07/00 8/31/00 10/24/00 Cl \"09 Eth 10 11 09 09 09 11 12 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 12 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 12 09 12 09 09 10 09 12 09 10 09 09 09 09 09 09 12 09 09 04 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 . 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 Sex M 1 M M F F M M F F F F F M M F F F M M M M M F M M F M M M F M F M F M M F M M F F M F F M N F F M M M Infraction__________ __________ 1133 REPEATED SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 1062 REFUSE 10 OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 2123 POSSESSION OR U3E/PA0ING DEVIC VERBAL ABUSE/FIGHTING W : TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1110 USE OF 1060 FAILURE 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLCW RULES OR DIR 2123 POSSESSION OR USE/PAGING DEVIC TO OBEY BULES OR DIBECT : TO FOLLOW BULES OR DIR 1062 REFUSE : 1060 FAILURE 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1060 FAILURE TO 1062 REFUSE TO ( ) FOLLOW RULES OR DIR OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY BULES OR DIRECT 1060 FAILURE TO follow rules or DIR 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIBECT 1060 FAILUBE TO FOLLOW BULES OB DIB 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 1110 USE OF VERBAL ABUSE/FIGHTING W 1062 REFUSE TO 1062 REFUSE TO 1062 REFUSE TO Inf Date 10/16/00 OBEY RULES OR DIRECT OBEY RULES OR DIRECT OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLCW RULES OR DIB 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 2123 POSSESSION OR USE/PAGING DEVIC 1060 FAILUKE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1133 REPEATED SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLCW RULES OR DIR 1060 failure to follow RULES OR DIR 9/07/00 9/18/00 1/05/01 12/05/00 9/08/00 11/17/00 9/12/00 9/05/00 8/24/00 12/01/00 9/07/00 9/01/00 9/11/00 9/13/00 1/05/01 12/01/00 9/13/00 9/01/00 10/25/00 8/29/00 12/07/00 9/22/00 12/01/00 8/29/00 9/01/00 10/03/00 9/07/00 11/21/00 10/30/00 8/29/00 12/07/00 12/05/00 10/26/00 10/16/00 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLCW RULES OR DIR 1070 REFUSE TO OBEY BUS RULES/REGUL 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLCW RULES OR DIR 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OB DIR 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION __ 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY BULES OB DIBECT 10/05/00 9/01/00 9/15/00 9/01/00 9/14/00 11/16/00 9/12/00 10/01/00 8/31/00 9/12/00 10/18/00 11/20/00 9/07/00 8/30/00 10/19/00 DML008R2 Date: 1/09/01 Discipline Management System Action Summary Report School 002 HALL 2000/0B/21 2001/01/05 ACTION: SW STUDENT WARNED Page 3 11:53 AM Sch 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 . 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 Student________________________ _ 301168 HARRISON, BRANDON D. 301168 HARRISON, BRANDON D. 960268 HAYNES, DERRICK D. 907806 HENDERSON, REGGIN D. 928189 HINES, KEVIN L. 933953 HOLMES, HOY L. 933962 HORTON, TERRA N. 935758 HUMPHREY, AUBREY J. 998645 HYDE, MATTHEW K. 928805 IRBY, TAMARA D. 922193 JONES, COREY D. 922193 JONES, COREY D. 301942 LANKFORD, DAVID C. 917084 LEWIS, ANTON K. 896526 LONDON, TERRY D. 950865 LYTLE, JOSEPH D. 927425 MACK, REGGIE. 928083 MACKINTRUSH, KENDRA L. 933206 MANNING, ARTHUR L. 922360 MARSHALL, KENDALL E. 303251 MARTINEZ, ISAAC. 917390 MATLOCK, MARCUS L. 998332 MCCULLOUGH, LAJEAN M. 913332 MCDANIEL, ARIEL J. 974381 MCDANIEL, AVIVA M. 974381 MCDANIEL, AVIVA M. 993967 MCDANIEL, NELSON D. 980071 MCMULLIN, TOCABRA R. 984984 MEAD, KATBALIYA. 912898 MEITZENHEIMER, BRAIN M. 919344 MILLEN, SHADRICK L. 995504 MILLER, MARQUITA R. 306110 MILLER, PIERRE D. 929413 MINICK, MATTHEW D. 911864 MYERS, KEVIN G. 936111 NEELY, BRANDON M. 936111 NEELY, BRANDON M. 913208 NEELY, DEBECK M. 995351 PARKER, ADRIANE D. 934808 PARKER, HELEN A. 928457 PARKER, KINGSTON E. 916418 PAYNE, JCSN W. 933004 PHILLIPS, CALLIE J. 928088 PIERKOWSKI, DAVIN V. 959550 POWELL, WALTER. 300957 RODRIGUEZ, DANIEL. 990177 SANTIAGO, ROBERT L. ggom Santiago, boberi l. 935039 SCOTT, RODNEY D. 301899 SHELLY, JONATHAN W. 927458 SMITH, ALEXIS C. Date 9/15/00 11/16/00 12/07/00 11/03/00 1/05/01 9/12/00 9/13/00 11/06/00 9/18/00 9/01/00 9/29/00 10/27/00 11/08/00 12/11/00 9/25/00 10/06/00 11/21/00 8/30/00 9/19/00 11/17/00 9/07/00 9/22/00 9/19/00 9/01/00 9/19/00 9/25/00 10/17/00 9/19/00 9/01/00 10/09/00 10/02/00 12/05/00 11/17/00 11/20/00 9/22/00 8/30/00 11/08/00 8/29/00 11/10/00 10/25/00 9/05/00 9/12/00 11/15/00 10/31/00 8/28/00 9/21/00 9/29/00 10/06/00 8/31/00 9/05/00 9/07/00 Cl 09 09 09 12 09 12 09 09 12 09 10 10 09 12 10 09 09 09 09 09 09 12 09 12 09 09 09 09 12 12 12 12 09 10 12 09 09 10 12 09 09 12 09 09 12 12 09 09 09 09 09 Eth 01 01 02 02 02 02 02 02 01 02 02 02 01 02 02 01 02 02, 02 02 03 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 04 02 02 02 02 01 02 02 02 02 02 02 : 02 = 02 02 01 02 03\n06: 06 02 02 02 Sex M M M M M M F M M F H M M M M M M F M M M M F F F F M F F M M F M M M M H M F F M M F M M M M N M M F Infraction_________________________ __ failure to foIiLOw rules or dir 1060 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 2123 POSSESSION OR USE/PA0IN6 DEVIC 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY BULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1133 REPEATED SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1030 MINOR ALTERCATICSi 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1133 REPEATED SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1110 USB OF VERBAL ABUSB/FIGHTING W 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 1100 USE OR POSSESSION OF TOBACCO 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY BULES OR DIRECT 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIB 1110 USE OF VERBAL ABUSE/FIGHTING W 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT Inf Date 9/15/00 11/16/00 12/07/00 11/03/00 1/05/01 9/12/00 9/13/00 10/27/00 9/18/00 8/30/00 9/29/00 10/27/00 10/06/00 12/11/00 9/14/00 9/29/00 11/21/00 8/30/00 9/18/00 11/17/00 9/07/00 9/22/00 9/15/00 8/30/00 9/14/00 9/14/00 10/17/00 9/08/00 9/01/00 10/09/00 10/02/00 12/05/00 11/16/00 11/20/00 9/22/00 8/30/00 11/01/00 8/29/00 11/10/00 10/25/00 9/05/00 9/12/00 11/14/00 10/31/00 8/28/00 9/21/00 9/29/00 9/26/00 8/31/00 men FiTT.iniB TO FOTlfM RHT.ES OR DIB---- 1060 FAILURE TO -F-O-L-L-O-W- -R-U-L-E-S- -O-R- -D-I-R---- 8/31/00 DML008R2 Date: 1/09/01 Discipline Management System Action Summary Report Page 4 11:53 AM School 002 HALL 2000/08/21 2001/01/05 ACTION: SW STUDENT WARNED Sch 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 Student______________________ 918316 SMITH, ANTRONE W. 933162 SMITH, TIMOTHY J. 931509 SPROUSE, KRISTIAN T. 952053 STARKS, GREGORY J. 922240 TATE, ASHLEY N. 936920 THOMPSON, BREON D. 926366 THOMPSON, JOHNNIE L. 923975 THOMPSON, LATOYA R. 923975 THOMPSON, LATOYA R. 960526 THORNTON JR,, CHESTER L. 915455 THORNTON, THEOTIS D. 927657 VEASEY, MARCUS D. 987863 VIDRINE, KYLE W. 930092 WADE, KEITH J. 930092 WADE, KEITH J. 928693 WADE, KRYSTAL L. 994416 WARREN, MARCUS S. 915680 WASHINGTON, KRISTOPHER K. 929183 WESTON, TRAVIS D. 922332 WHITE, KELLIE P. 929131 WILLIAMS, BRANDY L. 929131 WILLIAMS, BRANDY L. 929240 WILLIAMS, GREGORY J. 928737 WILLIAMS, LAMONT D. 968967 WILLIAMS, MARQUES A. 301849 WILSON, APRIL L. 916470 WIMBLEY, LOUIS G. Date 9/22/00 8/30/00 9/27/00 12/11/00 8/30/00 9/27/00 9/22/00 9/12/00 12/08/00 10/02/00 10/03/00 11/14/00 10/09/00 10/03/00 10/11/00 9/05/00 11/03/00 11/03/00 9/25/00 8/29/00 8/30/00 11/21/00 9/14/00 11/16/00 10/24/00 8/31/00 9/13/00 Cl 11 09 12 09 10 09 09 09 09 12 12 09 09 09 09 09 12 12 09 10 09 09 09 09 09 11 12 Eth 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 01 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 , 02 02 02 02 02\n02 : 02 , Sex M M F M F H M F F M M M M M M P M M M F F F M M M F M Infraction____________________ 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT REFUSING TO FOLUW DIRECTIVES 1062 2105 1133 REPEATED SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2123 POSSESSION OR USE/PAGING DEVIC 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1070 REFUSE TO OBEY BUS RULES/REGUL 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR refuse to OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 2105 1062 1050 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT left SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW BULES OR DIR 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM Inf Date 9/22/00 8/30/00 9/27/00 12/11/00 8/30/00 9/27/00 9/22/00 9/11/00 11/21/00 10/02/00 10/03/00 11/14/00 10/09/00 10/02/00 10/10/00 8/31/00 11/03/00 11/03/00 9/22/00 8/29/00 8/30/00 11/21/00 9/14/00 11/16/00 10/06/00 8/31/00 9/13/00 ACTION: 01 IN-SCHOOL SUSPENSION Sch 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 Student_________________________ 979010 ABDO, JON I. 974579 AL-OTArai, TURKI T. 926887 ALLISON, CRYSTAL N, 933036 ALLISON, RICKY S. 933222 ANDERSON, DEMETRIA A. 936556 ANDERSON, JULIA M. 927271 ANDERSON, THEODIS. 965739 ARNOLD, ANGELA M. 928751 BEAVERS, CORTE L. 928451 BECKTON, SHANNON L. 986145 BENNETT, STEVEN R. 973698 BENRAHOU, IKRAM. 926906 BEULAH, RONNIE E. 928906 BEULAH, RONNIE E. 927432 BLUB, MIRANDA D. 002 931379 BROWN, CHRISTOLYN M. nf\u0026gt;2 020214 BRCWN ,_ LAMEATRIA S- . 002 929214 BRCAfN, LAMEATRIA S. Date 1/05/01 11/01/00 11/27/00 12/11/00 10/19/00 10/10/00 9/18/00 11/27/00 11/07/00 12/12/00 11/08/00 11/07/00 9/27/00 9/27/00 10/30/00 9/14/00 10/16/00 9/08/00 9/08/00 Cl 09 10 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 12 10 09 09 10 12 10 09 09 Eth 04 } 04 * 02 02\n02 02 02 02 02 02 . 02 01 02 02 02 02 ' 02 02 t 02 * Sex M M F M F F M P M F M F M M F M F F F Infraction_________________________ 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY BULES OR DIRECT 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1110 USE OF VERBAL ABUSE/FIGHTING W repeated SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES 1133 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1050 LEFT Inf Date 1/04/01 10/31/00 11/20/00 11/30/00 10/17/00 10/09/00 9/15/00 11/20/00 10/24/00 12/06/00 11/08/00 11/06/00 9/20/00 9/26/00 10/27/00 9/14/00 10/13/00 8/29/00 8/29/00DML00BR2 Data: 1/09/01 School 002 HALL Discipline Management System Action Summary Report 2000/08/21 2001/01/05 Page 5 11:53 AM ACTION: 01 IN-SCHOOL SUSPENSION Sch 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 Student 926897 BRCWN, SHARON M. 935060 BROWN, TAMEIKA D. 922147 BROWN, TYWAN D. 926918 BRUTON, BLAKE A. 928132 BUCKLEY, JOY J. 929848 BUCKNER, CEDRIC R. 927878 BURSE, TONY D. 916431 BUTLER, JEFF M. 921701 CAMPBELL, JARED L. 926574 CARPENTER, MATTHEW T. 975122 CARVAJAL, ADELA. 975122 CARVAJAL, ADELA. 950742 CLARK, DEITRA R. 928156 CLARK, SHAKITA V. 928831 CLEMMONS, MARCELL L. 928852 COATS, ARCHIE M. 927886 COLWYE, GREGORY J. 973904 CRAWFORD, ASHLEY A. 922465 CRUTCHFIELD, SHANKA L. 922465 CRUTCHFIELD, SHANKA L. 922465 CRUTCHFIELD, SHANKA L. 933260 CURLBTT, AYANA J. 924435 CURLEY, BRANDON S. 922171 DAVIS, CHRISTOPHE P. 933180 DAVIS, NIKKI T. 916474 DENNIS, GARRY C. 915910 DONAHUE, JESSICA M. 974302 EASON, BRITTANY. 974302 EASON, BRITTANY. 935320 EVANS, ALICIA W. 995769 FINN-SMITH, CLAIRE K. 992486 GAGE, ANTOINE B. 910120 GARDNER, MARYNTHIA R. 923617 GILES, TYRONE D. 916131 GLASPIB, CRYSTAL G. 321513 GOODMAN, KEISHA N. 927576 GOODMAN, KEITH D. 927576 GOODMAN, KEITH D. 928297 GRAY, JENNIFER D. 928297 GRAY, JENNIFER D. 930261 GREEN, CHRISTOPHE B. 930602 GREEN, KENYONE S. 992606 GREEN, MYISHA R. 916521 GRIDLEY, EBONY T. 928418 GRIFFIN, LARON L. 912510 GRIGSBY, NICOLE R. 936370 HAMPTON, CLIFTON E. 930547 HARDY, LAKESHIA L. 930547 HARDY, LAKESHIA L. 975070 HARRIS, YESMAN L. 91501Q HARRIS, YESMAN L. Date 11/16/00 9/20/00 11/16/00 11/15/00 11/16/00 11/14/00 11/07/00 9/11/00 11/30/00 10/26/00 10/18/00 11/30/00 11/06/00 10/30/00 10/17/00 10/03/00 12/11/00 10/13/00 9/08/00 9/08/00 11/15/00 11/29/00 10/06/00 11/20/00 9/14/00 12/07/00 10/24/00 10/10/00 12/08/00 12/11/00 12/04/00 9/14/00 10/20/00 10/10/00 11/09/00 9/22/00 9/21/00 11/14/00 9/07/00 12/04/00 9/22/00 9/27/00 10/16/00 10/06/00 9/15/00 10/12/00 9/14/00 11/06/00 12/08/00 9/25/00 11/06/00 Cl 10 09 10 10 09 09 09 12 09 10 10 10 10 09 09 09 10 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 12 12 09 09 09 10 12 12 10 12 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 12 09 12 09 09 09 09 09 Eth 02 02 02 01 02 02 02 01 01 01 03 03 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 , 02\n02 02 01 02 : 02 I 02 I 02 02 ! 02 J 02: 02\n02: 02 i 02 02 I 02 02 02 I 02 ' 02 I 02 02 , 02 Sex F F M M F M M M M M F F F F M M M P F F F F M M F M F F F F F M F M F F M M F F M M F F M F M F F M M Infraction _________ ____________ 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1110 USE OF VERBAL ABUSE/FIGHTING W 1080 FAILURE TO SERVE DETENTION 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1133 REPEATED SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1110 USE OF VERBAL ABUSE/FIGHTING W 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1080 FAILURE TO SERVE DETENTION 1080 FAILURE TO SERVE DETENTION 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1040 BEHAVIOR THAT VIOLATES A PERSO 1133 REPEATED SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1040 BEHAVIOR THAT VIOLATES A PERSO 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1133 REPEATED SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1090 REFUSED TO SERVE DETENTION 1080 FAILURE TO SERVE DETENTION 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1090 REFUSED TO SERVE DETENTION 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1090 REFUSED TO SERVE DETENTION 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO F(aiLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1110 USE OF VERBAL ABUSE/FIGHTING W 1110 USE OF VERBAL ABUSE/FIGHTING W 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1133 REPEATED SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR-DIRECT Inf Date 11/15/00 9/18/00 11/15/00 11/14/00 11/06/00 11/14/00 10/27/00 9/11/00 11/30/00 10/25/00 10/17/00 11/29/00 11/01/00 10/16/00 10/14/00 9/28/00 12/08/00 10/12/00 9/07/00 9/08/00 11/09/00 11/01/00 10/05/00 11/17/00 9/13/00 12/07/00 10/24/00 10/09/00 12/07/00 12/08/00 12/01/00 9/14/00 10/20/00 10/09/00 11/09/00 9/21/00 9/20/00 11/14/00 9/07/00 11/29/00 9/21/00 9/22/00 10/13/00 10/06/00 9/14/00 10/12/00 9/06/00 11/01/00 12/07/00 9/19/00 11/01/00 DML008R2 Date: 1/09/01 Discipline Management System Action Sunmary Report Page 6 11:53 AM School 002 BALL 2000/06/21 2001/01/05 ACTION: 01 IH-SCHOOL SUSPENSION Sch 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 . 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 Student__________________________ 929217 HART, ALISA R. 935452 HAWKINS, DEREK T. 935453 HAWKINS, ERIC T. 923305 HAYNES, DERRICK D. 959119 HAYWCXJD, RICKEY L. 929312 HEARD, DIA M. 979726 HENDERSON, RICARDO. 928189 HINES, KEVIN L. 986526 HINTON, PRESTON R. 922119 HOLLOWAY, JACQUITA R. 929156 HOLLCWAY, QUINCY C. 933953 HOLMES, ROY L. 921853 BOUSE, LEANN M. 931927 HOWARD, JILNIAL A. 917030 HUMPHREY, NATHAN J. 998645 HYDE, MATTHEW K. 915968 JACKMAN, IRVING P. 915544 JACKSON, DANNY J. 923794 JAMES, QUINTON T. 993806 JANISZEWSKI, PATRYK L. 993806 JANISZEWSKI, PATRYK L. 923150 JEFFERSON, EARNEST E. 931020 JOHNSON, AMANDA D. 927431 JOHNSON, ANTOINETTE L. 927431 JOHNSON, ANTOINETTE L. 992375 JOHNSON, EARVIN B. 930877 JOHNSON, JEROME E. 928703 JOHNSON, LATASBA L. 919336 JOHNSON, TAURUS T. 994765 JONES, LATEASHIA M. 916512 JONES, MONTAYE D. 933051 JONES, SHANELLE L. 922041 JORDAN, TIFFANYE D. KENNEY, TALISHA L. 928409 KING, ANTWOIN D. 984289 LANGLEY, CRYSTAL H. 924076 LEE, JENNIFER L. 917084 LEWIS, ANTON K. 910356 LOVE, CARLOS D. 916005 LOVE, MARQUIIA k. 950865 LYTLE, JOSEPH D. 932666 MADISON, JEROME. 932269 MANNING, SCOTTIE G. 922360 MARSHALL, KENDALL E. 922360 MARSHALL, KENDALL E. 960036 MARTIN, JOHN E, 996454 MARTINEZ, YEFRI Y. 930020 MCCRAY, BRADLEY S. 998332 MCCULLOUGH, LAJEAN M. 913332 MCDANIEL, ARIEL J. 974381 MCDANIEL, AVIVA M. Date___ 10/18/00 12/08/00 10/13/00 1/04/01 12/11/00 11/27/00 12/07/00 1/03/01 11/10/00 10/18/00 12/13/00 12/01/00 11/16/00 11/07/00 12/05/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/09/00 9/14/00 9/22/00 9/22/00 11/10/00 11/29/00 9/05/00 11/30/00 9/05/00 9/27/00 9/28/00 9/08/00 9/14/00 11/09/00 9/06/00 9/28/00 10/18/00 11/06/00 10/12/00 10/25/00 10/12/00 10/05/00 9/27/00 10/10/00 11/15/00 11/27/00 9/18/00 11/15/00 9/22/00 12/05/00 12/07/00 10/26/00 9/14/00 10/31/00 Cl___ 09 10 10 11 10 10 12 09 10 10 10 12 09 10 12 12 12 10 10 12 12 10 09 10 10 12 10 09 12 12 12 09 10 10 09 12 10 12 12 11 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 12 09 12 09 Eth 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 01 02 06 01 02 02 02 01 , 01 ' 02 02 02 02 02 02 I 02 i 02 02 02 . 02 i 02 1 02 I 02 02 f 02 \u0026lt; 02 t 02 02 I 01 02 . 02 02 02 02 06 01 02 ' 02 02 Sex F M M M M F M M M F M M F F M M M M M M M M F F F M M F M F M F F M F F M M F M M M M M M M H P F F Infraction__________ 1062 PKFUSS TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1080 FAILURE TO SERVE DETENTION 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1133 REPEATED SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1110 USE OF VERBAL ABUSE/FIGHTING W 1080 FAILURE TO SERVE DETENTION 1080 FAILURE TO SERVE DETENTION 1060 1110 2105 FAILUBE TO FOLLCW RULES OR DIR USE OF VERBAL ABUSE/FIGHTING W REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1080 FAILURE TO SERVE DETENTION 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1110 USE OF VERBAL ABUSE/FIGHTING W 1080 FAILURE TO SERVE DETENTION 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLCW RULES OR DIR 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1080 FAILURE TO SERVE DETENTION 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1133 REPEATED SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1090 REFUSED TO SERVE DETENTION 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1080 FAILURE TO SERVE DETEOTION 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1080 FAILURE TO SERVE DETENTION 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1080 FAILURE TO SERVE DETENTION 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1133 REPEATED SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES 1133 REPEATED SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1133 REPEATED SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES Inf Date 10/05/00 12/07/00 10/12/00 1/03/01 12/08/00 11/21/00 12/07/00 1/03/01 11/10/00 10/17/00 12/12/00 12/01/00 11/14/00 11/06/00 12/05/00 10/12/00 10/12/00 10/06/00 9/12/00 9/22/00 9/22/00 11/09/00 11/21/00 9/01/00 11/29/00 9/05/00 9/26/00 9/14/00 9/08/00 9/14/00 11/09/00 9/05/00 9/27/00 10/17/00 10/30/00 10/12/00 10/24/00 10/12/00 10/05/00 9/27/00 10/06/00 10/31/00 11/21/00 9/18/00 11/09/00 9/21/00 12/04/00 12/07/00 10/05/00 9/14/00 10/30/00DML008R2 Date: 1/09/01 Discipline Management System Action Summary Report School 002 HALL 2000/08/21 2001/01/05 ACTION: 01 IN-SCHOOL SUSPENSION Page 7 11:53 AM Sch 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 Student 918615 MCKINNBYr JAMES 980071 MCMULLIN, TOCARRA R. 984968 MEAD, DEBBIE D, 924732 MEDLOCK, CORINIHIA M. 912898 MEITZENHEIMER, BRAIN M. 936449 MENDEZ-WARD, DEONE M. 921659 MILLER, WILLIE M. 921659 HILLER, WILLIE M. 929413 MINICK, MATTHEW D. 922369 MOORE, JOHNATHON T. 928857 MOORE, LEANDER L. 929155 MOORE, WILLIE. 907380 MORGAN, FELTON T. 933516 MYERS, GERARD L. 911864 MYERS, KEVIN G. 936111 NEELY, BRANDON M. 305160 NORMAN, LADONNA A. 960701 NORRIS, LATOYA R. 931800 NORWOOD, GALON C. 931600 NORWOOD, GALON C. 931800 NORWOOD, GALON C. 919843 NOWDEN, SHAKITA. . 973702 ORTEGA, FRANK M. 928619 OWENS, ANTHONY D. 918601 PARKER, KORTNI D. 908102 PATTON, MICHAEL C. 916416 PAYNE, JOHN W. 916223 PENNINGTON, CEDRIC E. 935385 PHILLIPS, JEFFREY A, 928088 PIERKOWSKI, DAVIN V. 959853 PONCE, INGRID J. 972721 POSTELL, ALIYA C. 922663 POTTLE, KRISTIN J. 907726 PRIDE, LONZELL L. 936011 RATLIFF, THOMAS M. 928677 RAYFORD, OTIS. 926843 REED, ANDRE D. 933723 REED, SHASTA L. 993875 RBVUELTA, RIGOBERTO M. 919498 REYNOLDS, SEAN P. 919498 REYNOLDS, SEAN P. 928209 REYNOLDS, SHAUN K. 928209 REYNOLDS, SHAUN K. 931748 RICE, ARLO D. 931748 RICE, ARLO D. 928624 ROBERSON, JOHATHAN A. 932730 ROBINSON, TANEISHA L. 928766 ROSE, MALESA R. 929900 SCOTT, INDIA C. 935039 SCOTT, RODNEY D. 996909 SHERRER, CHRISTOPHE D. Date 9/01/00 12/12/00 11/30/00 11/08/00 10/24/00 10/25/00 9/22/00 11/09/00 11/13/00 9/28/00 12/01/00 12/04/00 9/21/00 9/08/00 12/11/00 10/13/00 9/28/00 11/27/00 9/28/00 9/28/00 12/04/00 11/03/00 9/11/00 9/15/00 12/07/00 11/03/00 11/03/00 11/16/00 11/16/00 12/06/00 11/15/00 10/03/00 12/07/00 9/27/00 12/11/00 9/18/00 11/07/00 9/28/00 1/05/01 11/10/00 1/04/01 9/13/00 11/10/00 10/24/00 10/29/00 10/17/00 11/06/00 10/09/00 11/30/00 9/13/00 12/05/00 Cl 10 09 10 09 12 10 12 12 10 10 10 09 12 09 12 09 10 09 09 09 09 12 12 09 12 12 12 10 09 09 10 09 12 12 10 09 10 09 09 12 12 09 09 09 09 10 09 10 10 09 12 Eth 03 02 03 02 02 02 02 02 01 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 03 02 02 02 02 02 02 01 03 02 01 02 02 02 02 02 03 02 02 , 02 : 02 02 02 02 t 02 ! 02 : 02\n02\n02 Sex M F F F M F M M M M M M M M M M F F M M M F M M M M M M M M F F F M M M M F M M M M M M M M F F F M M Infraction__________________ ________ 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1133 REPEATED SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1090 REFUSED TO SERVE DETENTION 1080 FAILURE TO SERVE DETENTION 1110 USE OF VERBAL ABUSE/FIGHTINO W 1040 BEHAVIOR THAT VIOLATES A PERSO 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1090 REFUSED TO SERVE DETENTION 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1133 REPEATED SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES 1133 REPEATED SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1110 USE OF VERBAL ABUSE/FIGHTING W 1110 USE OF VERBAL ABUSE/FIGHTING W 1090 REFUSED TO SERVE DETENTION 1133 REPEATED SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLCW RULES OR DIR 1080 FAILURE TO SERVE DETENTION 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 1080 FAILURE TO SERVE DETENTION 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1080 FAILURE TO SERVE DETENTION 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1070 REFUSE TO OBEY BUS RULES/REGUL 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1133 REPEATED SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES 1133 REPEATED SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO oRgv RinES OB DTHgCT 1090 REFUSED TO SERVE DETENTION Inf Date 8/31/00 12/08/00 11/29/00 9/28/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 9/22/00 11/09/00 11/10/00 9/28/00 11/30/00 11/27/00 9/21/00 9/07/00 12/11/00 10/02/00 9/27/00 11/07/00 9/20/00 9/26/00 11/28/00 11/03/00 9/11/00 9/14/00 12/07/00 11/03/00 11/03/00 11/15/00 11/10/00 11/30/00 11/14/00 9/29/00 12/07/00 9/27/00 12/08/00 9/12/00 11/06/00 9/27/00 1/04/01 11/06/00 1/03/01 9/08/00 11/06/00 9/29/00 9/29/00 10/16/00 11/01/00 10/06/00 11/01/00 12/05/00 DML008R2 Date: 1/09/01 Discipline Management System Action Sunmary Report School 002 HALL 2000/08/21 2001/01/05 ACTION: 01 IN-SCHOOL SUSPENSION Page 8 11:53 AM Sch 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 Student 950190 SKAGGS, SARAH K. 917237 SLOAM, KATRINA A. 918316 SMITH, ANTRONE W. 929697 SMITH, ROCHELLE L. 932573 STEVENSON, SHEENA P. 917556 STEWART, TERRENCE D. 928366 THOMPSON, JOHNNIE L. 923975 THOMPSON, LATOYA R. 929683 TILLMAN, MONIQUE D. 951887 TURNER, ARIC D. 951776 lURNER, DEMARIO Q. 950645 USREY, JOHN C. 935480 USSERY, BRYAN O. 301051 VALENCIA, EDWIN L. 927657 VEASEY, MARCUS D. 962849 WADE, BRANDI L. 932913 WALKER, CHIKE A. 935777 WALKER, CYRUS A. 916864 WALKER, GERALD D. 937535 WARREN, BRANDON L. 916398 WHITE, EBONY S. 922332 WHITE, KELLIE P. 930035 WHITE, TAMEKA L, 952489 WHITE, TAWANNA J. 305192 WILKERSON, ASHLEY R. 305192 WILKERSON, ASHLEY R. 929863 WILLIAMS, AMBER. 928962 WILLIAMS, LASHIKKA S. 922782 WILLIAMS, RORY M. 990591 WILLS, KATY L, 301849 WILSON, APRIL L. 916470 WIMBLEY, LOUIS 6. 916470 WIMBLEY, LOUIS G. 996402 WIRGES, TRACEY A. 933054 WITHERS, BRIEN A. 933054 WITHERS, BRIEN A. 924669 WRIGHT, DOMONIC D. 927658 WRIGHT, RODNEY J- 937479 YOUNG, FANTASIA U. 910724 YOUNG, GERRY L. Date 10/31/00 12/07/00 9/29/00 11/07/00 9/18/00 10/06/00 9/28/00 9/18/00 12/12/00 11/01/00 10/27/00 12/06/00 9/08/00 12/05/00 11/09/00 10/19/00 10/10/00 10/30/00 12/08/00 10/24/00 10/12/00 9/12/00 12/11/00 9/28/00 9/13/00 10/13/00 12/08/00 11/27/00 12/11/00 10/20/00 10/12/00 10/24/00 12/01/00 9/22/00 11/08/00 1/04/01 10/26/00 12/04/00 10/13/00 9/26/00 Cl 09 12 11 10 09 10 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 10 12 10 11 09 09 09 10 10 09 12 11 12 12 12 09 09 10 09 09 12 Eth 01 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 06 02 02 01 02 03 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 01 02 02 02 01 02 02 02 02 02 02 Sex F F M F F M M F F M M M M M M F M M M M F F F F F F F F M 7 F H H M M M M M F M Infraction ___________ __________ _ 1133 REFITTED SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES 1090 REFUSED TO SERVE DETENTION 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1080 FAILURE TO SERVE DETENTION 1110 USB OF VERBAL ABUSE/FIGHTING W 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1133 REPEATED SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1110 USE OF VERBAL ABUSE/FIGHTING W 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1040 BEHAVIOR THAT VIOLATES A PERSO 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1040 BEHAVIOR THAT VIOLATES A PERSO 1133 REPEATED SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1090 REFUSED TO SERVE DETENTION 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1133 REPEATED SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM Inf Date 10/20/00 12/07/00 9/26/00 11/06/00 9/15/00 10/05/00 9/27/00 9/15/00 12/12/00 10/31/00 10/26/00 11/30/00 9/05/00 12/04/00 11/08/00 10/10/00 10/09/00 10/27/00 12/07/00 10/20/00 10/12/00 9/11/00 12/11/00 9/25/00 9/11/00 10/10/00 12/07/00 11/21/00 12/05/00 10/20/00 10/12/00 10/24/00 12/01/00 9/22/00 11/07/00 1/03/01 10/25/00 12/01/00 10/12/00 9/26/00 ACTIONJ 02 OUT-OF-SCHOOL(NOT EXCEED 10 DY Sch 002 002 002 002 .002. 002 Student____________________ 979010 ABDO, JON I. 931439 ACOME, ERIC A. 931439 ACOME, ERIC A. 924232 ADROW, KANISHA L. onMft menu kwh b 916699 ALEXANDER, DERRICK D. Date 9/27/00 9/15/00 10/09/00 12/01/00 10/06/00 9/25/00 Cl 09 10 10 11 11 11 Eth 04 . 01 Oil 02 i 02 I 02 I Sex M M M F F H Infraction____________________ ________ 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT Inf Date 9/27/00 9/15/00 10/09/00 12/01/00 10/06/00 9/25/00 DML008R2 Date: 1/09/01 Discipline Management System Action Summary Report Page 9 11:53 AM School 002 HALL 2000/08/21 2001/01/05 ACTION: 02 OUT-OF-SCHOOL(NOT EXCEED 10 DY Sch 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 . 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 Student 918699 ALEXANDER, DERRICK D. 915415 ALLISON, TYRONE J. 927271 ANDERSON, THEODIS. 927271 ANDERSON, THEODIS. 927271 ANDERSON, THEODIS. 922422 ANGLIN, ANTHONY D. 965739 ARNOLD, ANGELA M. 921515 BANKSTON, CANDACE L. 922165 BATTEN, RARICOS L. 928751 BEAVERS, CORTE L. 933541 BELL, MARTIESBA D. 924986 BELL, MICHAEL W. 924986 BELL, MICHAEL W. 986145 BENNETT, STEVEN R. 986145 BENNETT, STEVEN R. 973698 BENRAHOU, IKRAM. 927827 BERMAN, DAVID J. 928906 BEULAH, RONNIE E. 998630 BOUIE, DARREN 0. 969818 BRADSHAW, CJHRISTOPHE R. 969818 BRADSHAW, CHIRISTOPHE R. 969818 BRADSHAW, CHRISTOPHE R. 922174 BROOKS, VERNON J. 915814 BRCWN, ANTOINE L. 915665 BROWN, ERIC K. 927231 BROWN, ERIC L. 927233 BRCWN, FLOYD L. 927233 BROWN, FLOYD L. 927233 BRCWN, FLOYD L. 927233 BROWN, FLOYD L. 923993 BROWN, FRANKLIN J. 923993 BROWN, FRANKLIN J. 926897 BROWN, SHARON M. 935060 BRCWN, TAMEIKA D. 937002 BROWN, TANISHA R. 916450 BRCWN, TRACY. 916450 BRCWN, TRACY, 927878 BURSE, TONY D. 927878 BURSE, TONY D. 916431 BUTLER, JEFF M. 930151 BYRD, RICHARD A. 986332 CABALLERO, JUAN C. 931893 CALLOWAY, BRYAN M. 931893 CALLCWAY, BRYAN M. 921701 CAMPBELL, JARED L. 303894 CANTU, MICHEAL C. 974900 CARROLL, KENNETH W. 974900 CARROLL, KENNETH W. 923743 CARROLL, SCORPIO L. 923743 CARROLL, SCORPIO L. 935483 CARTER, ARRIN T. Date 11/29/00 10/13/00 9/29/00 9/29/00 11/01/00 10/20/00 10/12/00 10/06/00 11/10/00 11/07/00 11/10/00 9/22/00 11/09/00 11/17/00 11/17/00 11/27/00 11/07/00 9/01/00 10/09/00 9/19/00 10/11/00 10/27/00 9/29/00 9/01/00 9/19/00 10/10/00 9/01/00 9/13/00 9/21/00 10/03/00 9/11/00 11/10/00 11/20/00 _11/17/00 11/16/00 9/28/00 10/13/00 10/18/00 11/10/00 10/10/00 11/01/00 9/28/00 8/30/00 9/20/00 12/11/00 9/06/00 10/13/00 12/05/00 9/26/00 9/28/00 9/18/00 Cl 11 11 09 09 09 11 09 09 10 09 09 11 11 12 12 10 11 09 10 12 12 12 10 11 10 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 09 09 11 11 09 09 12 09 12 09 09 09 11 09 09 09 09 09 Eth 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 : 02 02 02 02 . 02 02 02 01 01 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 . 02 02 02 02 02 i 02 02 j 02 - 02 02 02 02 01 02 03 : 02 02 01 01 02 02 02 02 , 02 I Sex M~ M M M M M F F M M F M M M M F M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M F F F F F M M M M M M M M M M M M M M Infraction________________________ 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OP CATEGOR 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2122 FALSIFYING SIGNATURE/INFOBMATI 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 2150 POSSESSION OR USE OF ALCOHOL O 3072 VERBAL ABUSE OF STAFF 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 2020 BATTERY 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLCW DIRECTIVES 2150 POSSESSION OR USE OF ALCOHOL O 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLCW DIRECTTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLCW DIRECTIVES 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLCW DIRECJTIVES 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLCW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLCW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLCW DIRECTIVES 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT Inf Date 11/28/00 10/13/00 9/27/00 9/27/00 10/27/00 10/20/00 10/12/00 10/06/00 11/10/00 10/24/00 11/09/00 9/22/00 11/09/00 11/17/00 11/17/00 11/27/00 11/07/00 9/01/00 10/09/00 9/19/00 10/11/00 10/27/00 9/29/00 9/01/00 9/19/00 10/10/00 8/31/00 9/11/00 9/21/00 10/03/00 9/07/00 11/07/00 11/17/00 11/16/00 11/16/00 9/27/00 10/13/00 10/13/00 11/10/00 10/10/00 10/27/00 9/28/00 8/29/00 9/19/00 12/11/00 9/06/00 10/12/00 12/04/00 9/26/00 9/26/00 9/15/00DML008R2 Date: 1/09/01 Discipline Management System Action Summary Report Page 10 11:53 AM School 002 HALL 2000/08/21 2001/01/05 ACTION: 02 OUTOP-SCHOOL(NOT EXCEED 10 DY Sch 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 Student 305238 CHANCE, JOHN M. 922361 CLARK, COURTNEY J. 928852 COATS, ARCHIE M. 928852 COATS, ARCHIE M. 928852 COATS, ARCHIE M. 928852 COATS, ARCHIE M. 927886 COLWYE, GREGORY J. 936876 CONNORS, DEANDRE A. 936876 CONNORS, DEANDRE A. 936876 CONNORS, DEANDRE A. 914146 CONNORS, KENYATTA C. 918458 CONWAY, RICKY. 926087 COTTON, KEVIN L. 926087 COTTON, KEVIN L. 934705 CRAIN, KENNETH. 934705 CRAIN, KENNETH. 922465 CRUTCHFIELD, SHANKA L. 924435 CURLEY, BRANDON S. 924435 CURLEY, BRANDON S. 927165 CYRUS, TERRELL C. 916550 DANIELS, CHRISTOPHE H. 919723 DAVIS, JEFF. 919723 DAVIS, JEFF. 933180 DAVIS, NIKKI T. 996430 DAVIS, RODIRQUES D. 996430 DAVIS, RODIRQUES 0. 930477 DEAN, RICKEY L. 915910 DONAHUE, JESSICA M. 928454 DUKES, BOBBY J. 928810 DULANEY, VAMON. 925512 ELLIS, GLENN D. 925512 ELLIS, GLENN D. 917083 FIELDS, AARON N. 927128 FIELDS, ARIANE N. 917026 FOSTER, COURTNEY R. 915901 FRAZIER, BRALON F. 915901 FRAZIER, BRALON F. 915901 FRAZIER, BRALON F. 992486 GAGE, ANTOINE B. 923617 GILES, TYRONE D. 923617 GILES, TYRCWE D. 927576 GOODMAN, KEITH D. 928297 GRAY, JENNIFER D. 928297 GRAY, JENNIFER D. 916963 GRAY, WILLIAM X. 985093 GRAYDON, CANTRELL. 985093 GRAYDON, CANTRELL. 985094 GRAYDON, CHRISTOPHE T. 930261 GREEN, CHRISTOPHE B. 930261 GREEN, CHRISTOPHE B. 930602 GREEN, KENYONE S. Date 9/08/00 9/26/00 9/08/00 10/24/00 10/24/00 12/01/00 12/11/00 9/12/00 9/27/00 9/27/00 9/22/00 11/01/00 9/26/00 11/14/00 10/18/00 11/30/00 9/27/00 10/09/00 11/10/00 11/13/00 9/19/00 10/05/00 11/29/00 11/07/00 10/27/00 11/08/00 10/17/00 10/27/00 11/10/00 12/11/00 8/29/00 10/06/00 9/13/00 9/21/00 9/26/00 9/15/00 11/01/00 11/27/00 11/17/00 10/11/00 12/12/00 12/06/00 11/30/00 11/30/00 8/30/00 10/31/00 11/17/00 9/28/00 10/05/00 10/13/00 11/21/00 Cl 11 10 09 09 09 09 10 09 09 09 11 10 10 10 09 09 09 09 09 09 11 09 09 09 10 10 10 12 09 09 10 10 10 10 12 12 12 12 12 10 10 09 09 09 11 09 09 09 09 09 09 Eth 01 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 . 01 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 i 02 02 02 02 i 02 1 02 02 ! 02 ' 02 02 02 j 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 ' 02 02 02 Sex M M M M M M M M M M F M M M M M F M M M M M M F M M M P M M M M M F M M M M M M M M F F M M M M M M M Infraction__________________________ 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2150 POSSESSION OR USE OF ALCOHOL O 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2122 FALSIFYING SIGNATURE/INFORMATI 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATSGOR 2040 MITTUAL COMBAT 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 2070 LOITERING OR CRIMINAL TRESPASS 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2121 REPEATED VIOLATION - CATEGORY 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 2030 THEFT/THEFT BY RECEIVING 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES Inf Data 9/08/00 9/26/00 9/08/00 10/24/00 10/16/00 11/30/00 12/11/00 9/11/00 9/26/00 9/26/00 9/22/00 10/31/00 9/26/00 11/14/00 10/13/00 11/29/00 9/26/00 10/06/00 11/09/00 11/10/00 9/19/00 10/03/00 11/19/00 10/20/00 10/26/00 11/08/00 10/17/00 10/27/00 11/10/00 12/11/00 8/29/00 10/06/00 9/13/00 9/21/00 9/26/00 9/15/00 11/01/00 11/27/00 11/17/00 10/11/00 12/12/00 12/05/00 11/16/00 11/29/00 8/30/00 10/30/00 11/16/00 9/27/00 10/03/00 10/12/00 11/20/00DKL00BR2 Date: 1/09/01 Discipline Management System Action Sunanary Report School 002 HALL 2000/08/21 2001/01/05 ACTIONI 02 OUT-OP-SCBOOL(HOr EXCEED 10 DY Page 11 11:53 AM Sch 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 Student___________________________ 992606 GREEN/ MYISHA R. 922785 GREEN, TORIBIO M. 929523 GREENE/ TRUDRELL L. 967674 GRIMES, ELBERT K. 304489 GUERRA, RODRIGO. 921517 HADLEY, CHAUNCEY R. 936370 HAMPTON, CLIFTON E, 936370 HAMPTON/ CLIFTON B. 936370 HAMPTON, CLIFTON E. 936370 HAMPTON, CLIFTON B. 922689 HARRIS, CLABORN L. 956716 HARRIS, LIMZI R. 921978 HARRIS, MARCUS D. 921978 HARRIS, MARCUS D. 936192 HARRIS, WHITNEY A. 975070 HARRIS, YESMAH L. 300751 HARRISON, CHRISTOPHE L. 929217 HART, ALISA R. 935452 HAWKINS, DEREK T. 935453 HAWKINS, ERIC T, 960268 HAYNES, DERRICK D. 959119 HAYWOOD, RICKEY L. 959119 HAYWOOD, RICKEY L. 952255 HENSON, LUVENA A. 922204 HIGGINS, PATRICK L. 924461 HINTON, BOBBY R. 924461 HINTON, BOBBY R. 933962 HORTCI, TERRA N. 931927 HOWARD, JILNIAL A. 913129 HUDSPETH, LEIFKL. 913129 HUDSPETH, LEIFEL. 924404 HUDSPETH, RAFEL L. 979383 HUGHES, WILLIAM R. 917030 HUMPHREY, NATHAN J. 928805 IRBY, TAMARA D. 915968 JACKMAN, IRVING P. 935672 JACKO, MICHAEL A. 920733 JACKSON, ANTONIO D. 999416 JACKSON, DALE E. 922186 JACKSON, TERRENCE L. 923794 JAMES, QUINTON T. 923794 JAMES, QUINTON T. 923794 JAMES, QUINTON T. 305875 JIMENEZ, NESTOR S. 931020 JOHNSON, AMANDA D. 932313 JOHNSON, EARVIN B. 960639 JOHNSON, IVORY J. 930877 JOHNSON, JEROME B. 919336 JOHNSON, TAURUS T. 919336 JOHNSON, TAURUS T. 935764 JOHNSON, TYRONE. Date 12/06/00 11/08/00 11/16/00 11/07/00 11/21/00 10/06/00 9/28/00 10/16/00 12/04/00 12/12/00 9/06/00 9/19/00 10/19/00 1/04/01 11/27/00 8/30/00 9/19/00 12/05/00 11/01/00 11/01/00 10/06/00 10/25/00 12/12/00 9/18/00 8/30/00 10/31/00 11/01/00 9/21/00 10/02/00 9/18/00 10/09/00 10/09/00 11/16/00 12/06/00 9/29/00 12/12/00 11/01/00 9/11/00 10/18/00 10/09/00 8/30/00 9/20/00 11/16/00 11/10/00 10/25/00 9/18/00 9/19/00 9/29/00 10/02/00 10/30/00 10/30/00 Cl 09 10 12 11 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 09 10 10 09 09 10 09 10 10 09 10 10 11 10 09 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 12 09 12 11 10 11 11 10 10 10 10 09 12 10 10 12 12 09 Eth 02 02 02 02 03 02 * 02 02 02 02 02 01 02 02 02 02 01 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 i 02 i 06 02 ' 02 02 02 02- 02 j 02 i 02\n02 * 03 02 02 02! 02 i 02 02 02 Sex F M M M M M M M M M M F M M F M M F M M M M M F M M M F F M M M M M F M M M F M M M M M F M M M M M M Infraction____________________-___ _ - 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2120 HARASSING COMMUNICATIONS 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF 2080 2090 VANDALISM (INTENTIONAL DESTRUC non-threatening profanity at O 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT 0 2080 VANDALISM (INTENTIONAL DESTRUC 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT 0 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2122 FALSIFYING SIGNATURE/INFORMATI 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 1070 REFUSE TO OBEY BUS RULES/REGUL 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT 0 2090 non-threatening PROFANITY AT O 2020 BATTERY 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT 0 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OP CATEGOR 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT Inf Date 12/04/00 11/08/00 11/16/00 11/07/00 11/20/00 10/06/00 9/28/00 10/16/00 12/01/00 12/11/00 9/06/00 9/19/00 10/19/00 1/03/01 11/06/00 9/01/00 9/18/00 12/01/00 10/27/00 10/27/00 10/02/00 10/25/00 12/11/00 9/18/00 8/29/00 10/31/00 10/09/00 9/21/00 9/29/00 9/18/00 10/09/00 10/09/00 11/15/00 12/06/00 9/26/00 12/12/00 11/01/00 9/11/00 10/18/00 10/09/00 8/30/00 9/20/00 11/15/00 11/10/00 10/24/00 9/18/00 9/19/00 9/29/00 10/02/00 10/30/00 10/27/00 DML008R2 Date: 1/09/01 Discipline Management System Action Sunmary Report page 12 11:53 AM School 002 HALL 2000/08/21 2001/01/05 ACTION: 02 OUT-OF-SCHOOL(NOT EXCEED 10 DY Sch 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 Student_____________ 935764 JOHNSON, TYRONE. 933051 JONES, SHANELLE L. 933051 JONES, SHANELLE L. 937594 JORDAN, ERIC D. 937594 JORDAN, ERIC D. 916691 JORDAN, RICHARD M. 922041 JORDAN, TIFFANYE D. 913703 LANGFORD, TONY L. 924076 LEE, JENNIFER L. 919085 LEE, JESSICA Y. 919085 LEE, JESSICA Y. 896526 LONDON, TERRY D. 910356 LOVE, CARLOS D. 916005 LOVE, MARQUITA A. 916005 LOVE, MARQUITA A. 916005 LOVE, MARQUITA A. 950865 LYTLE, JOSEPH D. 921843 MALLORY, JONATHON L. 921843 MALLORY, JONATHON L. 932269 MANNINO, SCOTTIE G. 922360 MARSHALL, KENDALL E. 922360 MARSHALL, KENDALL E. 994417 MASON, DAVID C. 922196 MCCLENDON, EDDIE L. 998332 MCCULLOUGH, LAJEAN M. 974381 MCDANIEL, AVIVA M. 998793 MCKINNEY, STEPHEN W. 998793 MCKINNEY, STEPHEN W. 987741 MCMILLON, CHASE R. 987741 MCMILLON, CHASE R. 980071 MCMULLIN, TOCARRA R. 984984 MEAD, KATHALIYA. 924732 MEDLOCK, CORINTHIA M. 922751 MERRITT, TERRY L. 917577 MILLER, JOSHUA M. 952061 MOLES, JENNIFER M. 952061 M3LES, JENNIFER M. 922279 MONTGOMERY, CASEY A. 922369 MOORE, JOHNATHON T. 925376 MOORE, LASHONDA L. 923768 MORRISON, QUINCY Z. 923768 MORRISON, QUINCY Z. 933035 MORTON, BRIAN E. 933035 MORION, BRIAN E. 305128 MUNOZ, OSCAR A. 936111 NEELY, BRANDON M. 936111 NEELY, BRANDON M. 913208 NEELY, DERECK M. 924343 NORRIS, BRANDON L. 924343 NORRIS, BRANDON L. 924343 NORRIS, BRANDON L. Date 12/07/00 10/03/00 11/13/00 9/21/00 10/09/00 11/08/00 10/30/00 10/09/00 9/01/00 9/11/00 9/26/00 10/02/00 10/24/00 10/09/00 10/13/00 11/10/00 12/05/00 9/26/00 11/10/00 9/07/00 9/20/00 12/01/00 11/17/00 10/30/00 10/27/00 11/10/00 9/14/00 9/27/00 10/03/00 10/20/00 11/27/00 9/29/00 11/10/00 10/18/00 9/06/00 9/29/00 11/16/00 10/17/00 11/06/00 10/18/00 8/31/00 9/15/00 10/13/00 11/09/00 11/28/00 10/13/00 11/13/00 9/21/00 9/22/00 11/21/00 11/21/00 Cl___ 09 09 09 10 10 12 10 11 10 09 09 10 12 11. 11 11 09 10 10 09 09 09 11 10 09 09 11 11 12 12 09 12 09 11 11 10 10 11 10 11 11 11 09 09 10 09 09 10 09 09 09 Eth 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 01 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 04 02 01 01 01 01 02 ' 02 02 02 02 02 02 03 02 1 02 02 02 02 02 I Sex M F F M M M F M F F F M M F F F M M M M M M M M F F M M M M F F F M M F F M M F M M M M M M M M M M M Infraction _. 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT 0 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2070 LOITERING OR CRIMINAL TRESPASS 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2150 POSSESSION OR USE OF ALCOHOL O 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2122 FALSIFYING SIGNATURE/INFORMATI 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2090 NCJ-THREATENINO PROFANITY AT O 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1133 REPEATED SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES 2115 VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2070 LOITERING OR CRIMINAL TRESPASS 2121 REPEATED VIOLATION - CATEGORY 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2122 FALSIFYING SIGNATURE/INFORMATI 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1110 USE OF VERBAL ABUSE/FIGHTING W Inf Date 12/01/00 10/03/00 11/10/00 9/21/00 10/09/00 11/08/00 10/27/00 10/09/00 9/01/00 9/05/00 9/26/00 9/29/00 10/24/00 10/09/00 10/13/00 11/10/00 12/01/00 9/25/00 11/09/00 9/07/00 9/20/00 11/29/00 11/17/00 10/27/00 10/27/00 11/09/00 9/14/00 9/27/00 10/03/00 10/20/00 11/10/00 9/29/00 11/09/00 10/18/00 9/06/00 9/29/00 11/15/00 10/17/00 11/01/00 10/18/00 8/31/00 9/15/00 10/12/00 11/07/00 11/28/00 10/02/00 11/09/00 9/21/00 9/21/00 11/20/00 10/26/00 DML008R2 Date\n1/09/01 School 002 HALL Discipline Management System Action Summary Report 2000/08/21 2001/01/05 Page 13 11:53 AM ACTION: 02 OUT-OF-SCHOOL(NOT EXCEED 10 DY Sch 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 Student_____________________ _____ 916325 NORRIS, ELDRIDGE B. 916335 NORRIS, ELDRIDGE B. 960701 NORRIS, LATOYA R. 931800 NORWOOD, GALON C. 931600 NORWOOD, GALON C. 959966 OLIVE, ROSHAWN L. 959966 OLIVE, ROSHAWN L 921453 OLIVER, TANESUA L. 928619 OWENS, ANTHONY D. 927451 CWENS, JASON M. 927451 CWENS, JASON M. 995061 PARKER, ANTHONY D. 928457 PARKER, KINGSTON E. 928457 PARKER, KINGSTON E. 928457 PARKER, KINGSTON E. 921885 PARKER, MILLICENT R. 921885 PARKER, MILLICENT R. 908102 PATTON, MICHAEL C. 975191 PATTON, MONTEZZ D. 916418 PAYNE, JOHN W. 916418 PAYNE, JOHN W. 916223 PENNINGTON, CEDRIC B. 916223 PENNINGTON, CEDRIC E. 301041 PERRY, CURTIS M. 907287 PETERS, LATISHA S. 935385 PHILLIPS, JEFFREY A. 926088 PIERKOWSKI, DAVIN V. 979139 POLANCO, CARLOS E. 959853 PONCE, INGRID J. 972721 POSTELL, ALIYA C. 972721 POSTELL, ALIYA C. 972721 POSTELL, ALIYA C. 959550 POWELL, WALTER. 907726 PRIDE, LONZELL L. 994525 RAMIREZ, ISAAC R. 928677 RAYFORD, OTIS. 928677 RAYFORD, OTIS. 928209 REYNOLDS, SHAUN K. 968177 RICHARDSON, GARY D. 925269 RIDEOUT, RICHARD C. 916491 ROBINSON, PETER H. 916491 ROBINSON, PETER H. 916491 ROBINSON, PETER H. 932730 ROBINSON, TANEISHA L. 965742 RODRIGUEZ, MARIA T. 926766 ROSE, MALBSA R. 910466 ROUSE, TYRELL E. 967852 SALERS, ROBERT D. 304665 SANDERS, EDWARD L. 304665 SANDERS, EDWARD L. 935039 SCCTT, RODNEY D. Date___ 10/09/00 10/19/00 10/09/00 10/05/00 11/01/00 11/01/00 11/07/00 9/13/00 10/09/00 9/19/00 10/17/00 9/15/00 9/28/00 10/09/00 11/15/00 10/05/00 10/13/00 11/30/00 10/26/00 9/22/00 11/06/00 10/02/00 11/01/00 9/05/00 10/25/00 9/11/00 12/05/00 10/31/00 11/27/00 10/10/00 10/20/00 11/09/00 10/13/00 11/16/00 9/29/00 11/10/00 11/29/00 10/09/00 10/11/00 12/04/00 10/06/00 11/15/00 12/12/00 11/20/00 11/28/00 11/17/00 11/17/00 10/12/00 10/19/00 12/06/00 9/18/00 Cl 10 10 09 09 09 10 10 11 09 11 11 11 09 09 09 10 10 12 10 12 12 10 10 09 12 09 09 12 10 09 09 09 12 12 11 09 09 09 09 10 11 11 11 09 10 10 12 10 11 11 09 Eth 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 01 01 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02\n02 ) 02 I 02 01 03 . 03 ! 02 02 02 02 J 02 I 03 02 02 02 02 02\n02 02 02 02 03 02 ' 02 01 02 02 02 Sex M M F M M M M F M M M M M M M F F M M M M M M M F M M M F F F F M M M M M M M M M M M F F F M M M M M Infraction _______ _ 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1090 REFUSED TO SERVE DETENTION 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2122 FALSIFYING SIGNATURE/INFORMATI 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 1132 USB/POSS. DRUGS {1ST) 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 1070 REFUSE TO OBEY BUS RULES/REGUL 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2090 NCW-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2122 FALSIFYING SIGNATURE/INFORMATI 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2120 HARASSING COMMUNICATIONS 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2150 POSSESSION OR USE OF ALCOHOL O 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2115 repeated violations of CATEGOR 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2122 FALSIFYING SIGNATURE/INFORMATI 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT Inf Date 10/06/00 10/19/00 10/03/00 10/03/00 10/27/00 11/01/00 11/06/00 9/13/00 10/06/00 9/19/00 10/17/00 9/15/00 9/27/00 10/06/00 11/14/00 10/03/00 10/12/00 11/30/00 10/25/00 9/22/00 11/06/00 10/02/00 10/31/00 8/31/00 10/25/00 9/08/00 11/30/00 10/31/00 11/27/00 10/10/00 10/19/00 11/08/00 10/13/00 11/16/00 9/29/00 11/09/00 11/28/00 10/06/00 10/11/00 12/01/00 10/06/00 11/15/00 12/12/00 11/17/00 11/27/00 11/16/00 11/17/00 10/12/00 10/19/00 12/06/00 9/ie/oo DML008R2 Date: 1/09/01 DiBcipline Management System Action Summary Report Page 14 11:53 AM School 002 HALL 2000/08/21 2001/01/05 ACTION\n02 OUT-OP-SCHOOL{NOT EXCEED 10 DY Sch 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 Student 924424 SHELLS/ KATHERINE N. 930946 SHELTON/ LATOYA S. 938606 SHINE/ RICKEY T. 905263 SIMMONS/ AARON G. 950190 SKAGGS/ SARAH K. 918316 SMITH/ ANTRONE W. 923826 SMITH/ PATRICE L. 933162 SMITH/ TIMOTHY J. 922323 SPENCER/ MICHAEL D. 922323 SPENCER/ MICHAEL D. 917556 STEWART, TERRENCE D. 917556 STEWART, TERRENCE D. 921290 STOKES, STEVEN A. 921290 STOKES, STEVEN A. 938719 STRIBLET, LA DON L. 938719 STRIBLET, LA DON L. 938719 STRIBLET, LA DON L. 938719 STRIBLET, LA DON L. 925024 STRICKLAND, MARQUITIA L. 998638 STROMAN, AMANDA M. 996638 STROMAN, AMANDA M. 922240 TATE, ASHLEY N. 921374 TAYLOR, BRIAN K. 916336 TAYLOR, JAMES X. 994915 TAYLOR, OZONE I. 936920 THOMPSON, BREON D. 304211 THOMPSCW, KANDACE M. 304211 THOMPSON, KANDACE M. 923975 THOMPSON, LATOYA R. 923975 THOMPSON, LATOYA R. 915455 THORNTON, THEOTIS D, 915490 TICEY, JAMES H. 915490 TICEY, JAMES H. 990231 TILMON, DONYA D. 971399 TODD, JEREMY T. 926747 TRUMBLE, STUART S. 926747 TRUMBLE, STUART S. 926747 TRUMBLE, STUART S. 951887 TURNER, ARIC D. 951776 TURNER, DEMARIO Q. 951776 TURNER, DEMARIO Q. 935480 USSERY, BRYAN 0. 935480 USSERY, BRYAN O. 935480 USSERY, BRYAN O. 927657 VEASEY, MARCUS D. 987863 VIDRINE, KYLE W. 962849 WADE, BRANDI L. 930092 WADE, KEITH J. 930092 WADE, KEITH J. 930092 WADE, KEITH J. 930092 WADE, KEITH J. Date 10/13/00 10/09/00 11/17/00 11/08/00 12/01/00 10/31/00 10/20/00 11/08/00 11/01/00 12/06/00 10/09/00 11/16/00 10/20/00 12/12/00 9/01/00 10/06/00 10/20/00 11/09/00 10/12/00 9/19/00 11/17/00 10/13/00 12/06/00 10/12/00 10/06/00 9/20/00 9/20/00 9/20/00 9/18/00 10/26/00 10/27/00 9/15/00 12/11/00 9/22/00 10/19/00 10/05/00 10/13/00 12/05/00 10/17/00 10/03/00 10/10/00 9/20/00 10/09/00 10/30/00 12/04/00 10/31/00 12/08/00 9/18/00 10/11/00 10/20/00 10/24/00 Cl 11 10 11 10 09 11 10 09 11 11 10 10 10 10 09 09 09 09 11 10 10 10 11 10 10 09 10 10 09 09 12 10 10 10 10 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 Eth 02 02 02 02 01 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 01 01 02 02 02 02 02 01 01 02 02 02 02 02 06 . 01 01 01 01 02 02 02 ' 02 : 02 - 02 . 02 01 5 02 02 02 02 02 Sex F F M M F M F M M M M M M M M M M M F F P F M M M M F F F F M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M F M M M M Infraction____________________ ______ 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2121 REPEATED VIOLATION - CATEGORY 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2122 FALSIFYING SIGNATURE/IBJFORMATI 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 2080 VANDALISM (INTENTIONAL DESTRUC 2122 FALSIFYING SIGNATURE/INFORMATI 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2150 POSSESSION OR USE OF ALCOHOL O 2150 POSSESSION OR USE OF ALCOHOL O 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 2040 MOTUAL COMBAT 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2090 N\u0026lt;M\u0026lt;-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 1070 REFUSE TO OBEY BUS RULES/REGUL 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT Inf Date 10/13/00 10/06/00 11/17/00 11/07/00 11/20/00 10/31/00 10/19/00 11/01/00 10/31/00 12/06/00 10/09/00 11/15/00 10/19/00 12/11/00 9/01/00 10/05/00 10/19/00 11/08/00 10/12/00 9/19/00 11/16/00 10/12/00 12/06/00 10/12/00 10/06/00 9/20/00 9/20/00 9/20/00 9/18/00 10/24/00 10/27/00 9/15/00 12/11/00 9/22/00 10/19/00 10/03/00 10/12/00 12/04/00 10/05/00 10/03/00 10/09/00 9/19/00 10/06/00 10/27/00 12/01/00 10/31/00 12/04/00 9/15/00 10/10/00 10/19/00 10/24/00 DML008R2 Date: 1/09/01 School 002 HALL Discipline Management System Action Suinniary Report 2000/08/21 2001/01/05 ACTIONS 02 OUT-OF-SCHOOL(NOT EXCEED 10 DY Page 15 11:53 AM Sch 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 Student___________________ 960119 WADE, RENALDO K. 960119 WADE, RENALDO K. 916864 WALKER, GERALD D. 937535 WARREN, BRANDON L. 911910 WARREN, WAYNE. 929183 WESTON, TRAVIS D. 922265 WHITE, ASHLEY D. 916398 WHITE, EBONY S. 922332 WHITE, KELLIE P. 922332 WHITE, KELLIE F. 952489 WHITE, TAWANNA J. 305192 WILKERSON, ASHLEY R. 305192 WILKERSON, ASHLEY R. 929131 WILLIAMS, BRANDY L. 929131 WILLIAMS, BRANDY L. 986647 WILLIAMS, CHRISTOPHE M. 938568 WILLIAMS, CURTIS L. 917010 WILLIAMS, DERRICK E. 929240 WILLIAMS, GREGORY J. 921571 WILLIAMS, LARRY M. 928962 WILLIAMS, LASHIKKA S. 897592 WILLIAMS, RODNEY E. 922782 WILLIAMS, RORY M. 933561 WILSON, GERALD A. 996402 WIRGES, TRACEY A. 996402 WIRGES, TRACEY A. 924669 WRIGHT, DOMONIC D. 924670 WRIGHT, JONATHAN L. 927658 WRIGHT, RODNEY J. Date 9/18/00 10/02/00 10/09/00 9/29/00 9/13/00 12/07/00 10/12/00 10/16/00 9/21/00 10/26/00 10/20/00 9/12/00 11/10/00 9/18/00 10/17/00 10/31/00 12/07/00 9/22/00 11/06/00 11/09/00 9/21/00 11/06/00 9/25/00 11/17/00 10/18/00 11/08/00 9/15/00 9/15/00 12/04/00 Cl 09 09 10 10 12 09 11 12 10 10 09 09 09 09 09 10 09 10 09 11 10 11 09 09 12 12 10 11 09 Eth 02 02 02 02 : 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 01 01 02 02 02 Sex M M M M M M F F F F F F F F F M M M M M F M M M M M M M M Infraction________ ______________________ 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIBECTIVES 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2122 FALSIFYING SIGNATURE/INFORMATI 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT 0 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIBECTIVES 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1110 USE OF VERBAL ABUSE/FIGHTING W 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIBECTIVES 2090 NOH-THBEATENING PROFANITY AT O 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY BULES OB DIRECT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIBECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIBECTIVES 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY BULES OB DIRECT Inf Date 9/15/00 9/29/00 10/09/00 9/28/00 9/13/00 12/05/00 10/12/00 10/16/00 9/21/00 10/25/00 10/18/00 9/07/00 11/08/00 9/15/00 10/16/00 10/31/00 12/07/00 9/22/00 11/05/00 11/09/00 9/21/00 11/01/00 9/22/00 11/14/00 10/18/00 11/08/00 9/15/00 9/15/00 12/05/00 ACTION\n03 OOS (LONG TEBM)/EXPULSION RCMD Sch 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 Student_____________ 931439 ACOME, ERIC A. 927271 ANDERSON, IHEODIS. 923699 BELCHER, NATASHA Y. 922174 BROOKS, VERNON J. 927233 BROWN, FLOYD L. 927233 BROWN, FLOYD L. 927233 BROWN, FLOYD L. 923993 BROWN, FRANKLIN J. 923993 BROWN, FRANKLIN J. 931893 CALLOWAY, BRYAN M. 923743 CARROLL, SCORPIO L. 998621 CHERRY, ROLLY M. 912353 CLICK, LASHONDRA D. 928852 COATS, ARCHIE M. 936876 CONNORS, DEANDRE A. 927165 CYRUS, TERRELL C. 924086 DIXON, CLBAVONE M. Date 11/07/00 11/17/00 9/22/00 11/09/00 9/29/00 10/20/00 12/01/00 9/29/00 9/29/00 12/08/00 10/10/00 10/11/00 9/28/00 12/11/00 10/18/00 9/18/00 9/14/00 Cl 10 09 10 10 09 09 09 09 09 09 09 10 11 09 09 09 10 Eth 01 02 02 02 02 02 02 . 02\n02 02 02 01 02 ' 02 02 02 02 Sex M M F M M M M M M M M F F M M M M Infraction ______________ _ _________ 3072 VERBAL ABUSE OF STAFF 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 3140 TERRORISTIC THREATENING 3072 VERBAL ABUSE OF STAFF 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIBECTIVES 2105 BEFUSING TO FOLLOW DIBECTIVES 2020 BATTEBY 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 3072 VERBAL ABUSE OF STAFF 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2010 ASSAULT 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 3072 VERBAL ABUSE OF STAFF 2020 BATTEBY 3090 POSSESSION OF WEAPON Inf Date 11/07/00 11/16/00 9/22/00 11/09/00 9/29/00 10/19/00 11/30/00 9/28/00 9/26/00 12/07/00 10/09/00 10/11/00 9/28/00 12/11/00 10/18/00 9/18/00 9/14/00 DML008R2 Date: 1/09/01 Discipline Management System Action Summary Report Page 16 11:S3 AM School 002 HALL 2000/08/21 2001/01/05 ACTION: 03 OOS (LONG TERM)/EXPULSION RCMD Sch 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 Student 925512 ELLIS, GLENN D. 917026 FOSTER, COURTNEY R. 928410 GRIFFIN, LARON L. 916573 HARRIS, MICHAEL D. 916573 HARRIS, MICHAEL D. 959119 HAYWOOD, RICKEY L. 918572 JAMES, KELVIN L. 923794 JAMES, QUINTON T. 923794 JAMES, QUINTON T. 992375 JOHNSON, EARVIN B. 982283 JONES, ANDREW D. 933051 JONES, SHANELLE L. 926653 KELSEY, WILLIAM P. 894448 LOWE, CORNELL D. 919352 MARTIN, SHELLY R. 988504 MCBRIDE, WILLIAM D. 922196 MCCLENDON, EDDIE L. 987741 MCMILLON, CHASE R. 923603 MORGAN, CAESER S. 933035 MORTON, BRIAN E. 933035 MORTON, BRIAN E. 928626 NORRIS, ARLANDRIS K. 931800 NORWOOD, GALON C. 973702 ORTEGA, FRANK M. 995061 PARKER, ANTHONY D. 967585 PATTON, DARLENE A. 973336 PETERS, TAKESHA R. 979139 POLANCO, CARLOS E. 990177 SANTIAGO, ROBERT L. 935039 SCOTT, RODNEY D. 924603 SIMPSON, CHRISTOPHE R. 931509 SPROUSE, KRISTIAN T. 932573 STEVENSON, SHEENA F. 938719 STRIBLET, LA DON L. 916336 TAYLOR, JAMES X. 951776 TURNER, DEMARIO Q. 935480 USSERY, BRYAN O. 930092 WADE, KEITH J. 960119 WADE, RENALDO K. 998679 WALKER, ALEXANDER D. 916470 WIMBLEY, LOUIS G. Date 11/13/00 10/09/00 10/16/00 9/26/00 11/17/00 9/06/00 8/31/00 10/10/00 11/15/00 10/17/00 9/28/00 9/12/00 11/13/00 11/01/00 12/05/00 10/31/00 1/05/01 11/10/00 9/21/00 12/01/00 12/11/00 9/18/00 12/11/00 10/18/00 10/31/00 9/28/00 10/27/00 10/01/00 10/10/00 11/07/00 9/12/00 12/07/00 11/13/00 12/01/00 11/16/00 11/18/00 12/01/00 12/05/00 10/27/00 12/11/00 12/06/00 Cl 10 12 09 12 12 10 10 10 10 12 09 09 09 11 12 09 10 12 09 09 09 09 09 12 11 09 11 12 09 09 10 12 09 09 10 09 09 09 09 09 12 Eth 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 . 02 02 02 03 02 02 02 03 06 02 02 02 02 i 02 i 02 02 02 02 02 01 02 ! J Sex M M M M M M M M M M M F M M M M M M M M M M M M M P F M M M M F F M M M M M M M M Infraction______________________________ 2020 BATTERY 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 3072 VERBAL ABUSE OF STAFF 2020 BATTERY 2121 REPEATED VIOLATION - CATEGORY 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 3072 VERBAL ABUSE OF STAFF 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 3072 VERBAL ABUSE OF STAFF 3072 VERBAL ABUSE OF STAFF 2020 BATTERY 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2100 SEXUAL MISC^DUCT/BEHAVIOR OR 3072 VERBAL ABUSE OF STAFF 2020 BATTERY 3072 VERBAL ABUSE OF STAFF 3072 VERBAL ABUSE OF STAFF 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 3072 VERBAL ABUSE OF STAFF 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2020 BATTERY 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 3140 TERRORISTIC THREATENING 3072 VERBAL ABUSE OF STAFF 2010 ASSAULT 3071 PHYSICAL ASSAULT OF STAFF 3140 TERRORISTIC THREATENING 3072 VERBAL ABUSE OF STAFF 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 3072 VERBAL ABUSE OF STAFF 3140 TERRORISTIC THREATENING 3072 VERBAL ABUSE OF STAFF 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2080 VANDALISM (INTENTIONAL DESTRUC 3092 POSS./WEAP KNIFE/CLUB/FACSIM.B Inf Date 11/13/00 10/09/00 10/16/00 9/26/00 11/17/00 9/06/00 8/31/00 10/10/00 11/15/00 10/17/00 9/28/00 9/12/00 11/13/00 11/01/00 12/05/00 10/31/00 1/05/01 11/10/00 9/21/00 11/30/00 12/11/00 9/18/00 12/08/00 10/18/00 10/31/00 9/28/00 10/27/00 10/01/00 10/10/00 11/07/00 9/12/00 12/07/00 11/13/00 11/30/00 11/16/00 11/17/00 11/30/00 12/04/00 10/27/00 12/08/00 12/06/00 ACTICW\n05 SENT HOME Sch 002 002 002 002 002 Student 301009 ALDACO, DALIA E. 923699 BELCHER, NATASHA Y. 973698 BENRAHOU, IKRAM. 925170 BOWMAN, KELION D. 915665 BROWN, ERIC K. Date 9/22/00 9/15/00 9/22/00 8/31/00 9/19/00 Cl 09 10 10 10 10 Eth , 03 : 02 01 02 02 Sex F F P M M Infraction_________________________ 1110 USE OF VERBAL ABUSE/FIGHTING W 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1110 USE OP VERBAL ABUSE/FIGHTING W 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OH DIRECT 2020 BATTERY Inf Date 9/22/00 9/15/00 9/22/00 8/31/00 9/19/00 t LDML006R2 Date: 1/09/01 School 002 HALL Discipline Management System Action Summary Report 2000/08/21 2001/01/05 ACTION I 05 SENT HOKE Page 17 11:53 AM Sch 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 Student__________ _______________________ 926897 BROWN, SHARON M^ 305516 CAZARES, CARLA M. 913182 CLAY, DEWAYNE. 928852 COATS, ARCHIE M. 926087 COTTON, KEVIN L. 927165 CYRUS, TERRELL C. DEAN, RICKEY L. 922858 DUHART, COURTNEY D. 925512 ELLIS, GLENN D. 992486 GAGE, ANTOINE B. 923617 GILES, TYRONE D. 936370 HAMPTON, CLIFTON E. 936370 HAMPTON, CLIFTON E. 921820 HENDERSON, LATOYA T. 304729 HILLSMAN, MICAH D. 932577 IFABIYI-APOLABI, VICTORIA B. 924166 JOHNSON, IRVING A. 960639 JOHNSON, IVORY J. 960639 JOHNSON, IVORY J. 930877 JOHNSON, JEROME E. 930877 JOHNSON, JEROME E. 922041 JORDAN, TIFFANYE D. 919085 LEE, JESSICA Y. 896526 LONDON, TERRY D. 977402 LOPEZ, MARIA P. 921843 MALLORY, JONATHON L. 932269 MANNING, SCOTTIE G. 987741 MCMILLON, CHASE R. 922369 MOORE, JOHNATHON T. 323391 MORRIS, TREMIN M. 925476 NEAL, TERRANCE R. 959966 OLIVE, ROSHAWN L. 959966 OLIVE, ROSHAWN L. 959966 OLIVE, ROSHAWN L. 935385 PHILLIPS, JEFFREY A. 921330 PHILLIPS, TOMI J. ____91907^POINTER, JOSEPH E. 928677 RAYFORD, OTIS. 924679 REED, ANGELA R. 935039 SCOTT, RODNEY D. 935759 SMITH, SHASTA N. 936048 STEPHENS, CRAIG L. 938719 STRIBLET, LA DON L. 930092 WADE, KEITH J. 305192 WILKERSON, ASHLEY R. i 301074 YOUNG, AMANDA B. Date 9/26/00 9/22/00 9/15/00 9/08/00 8/31/00 8/31/00 10/16/00 11/15/00 11/08/00 11/10/00 12/11/00 9/28/00 9/28/00 11/01/00 10/10/00 10/06/00 8/31/00 9/19/00 10/10/00 9/21/00 12/05/00 8/31/00 9/05/00 11/01/00 9/22/00 8/31/00 9/01/00 11/09/00 9/26/00 8/31/00 11/16/00 11/01/00 11/01/00 Cl 10 09 11 09 10 09 10 10 10 12 10 09 09 10 09 09 10 10 10 10 10 10 09 10 10 10 09 12 10 09 10 10 10 Eth 02 03 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 . 02 . 02 02 02 02 02 02 : 02 02 . 02 02 02 02 03 , 02 02 ' 02 II 02 ACTION: 502 STODENT HEARING OHLY - 502 Sch Student 12/05/00,_____ 10 9/08/00 12/05/00 8/30/00 10/17/00 11/01/00 10/14/00 10/27/00 10/11/00 10/19/00 11/17/00 9/05/00 10/27/00 Date 09 10 11 09 10 09 09 09 09 09 09 11 Cl 02 02 02 i 02 i 02 I 02 : 02 02 1 02 02 02 01 02 i 02 02 02 01 . Sex F F M M M M M M M M M M M F M F M M M M M F F M F M M M M M M M M __ M M F M M F M F M H M F F Infraction 1110 USE OF 1110 USE OF VERBAL ABUSE/FIGHTING W VERBAL ABUSE/FIGHTING W 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT FAILURE TO FOLLCW RULES OR DIR 1060 2105 2122 refusing to follow DIRECTIVES FALSIFYING SIGNATURE/INFORMATI 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 2020 BATTERY 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OP CATEGOR 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 3080 POSSESSION OF FIREARM 3072 VERBAL ABUSE OF STAFF 1090 REFUSED TO SERVE DETENTION 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 2020 BATTERY 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1133 REPEATED SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES 1050 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERM 1050 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1080 FAILURE TO SERVE DETENTION 1110 USE OF VERBAL ABUSE/FIGOTING W 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 1060 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIR 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 1110 USE OF VERBAL ABUSE/FIGHTING W 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 3140 TERRORISTIC THREATENING 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 1090 REFUSED TO SERVE DETENTION 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 2040 MUTUAL COMBAT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1080 FAILURE TO SERVE DETENTION 1062 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECT 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION 2090 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT O 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1030 MINOR ALTERCATION Inf Date 9/26/00 9/22/00 9/15/00 9/08/00 8/31/00 8/31/00 10/16/00 11/15/00 11/08/00 11/10/00 12/11/00 9/28/00 9/28/00 11/01/00 10/09/00 10/05/00 8/31/00 9/19/00 10/10/00 9/21/00 12/05/00 8/31/00 9/05/00 11/01/00 9/22/00 8/31/00 9/01/00 11/09/00 9/26/00 8/31/00 11/16/00 11/06/00 11/01/00 12/05/00 9/08/00 12/05/00 8/30/00 10/17/00 11/01/00 10/13/00 10/27/00 10/11/00 10/19/00 11/17/00 9/05/00 10/27/00 Eth Sex Infraction Inf Date DML00BR2 Date: 1/09/01 School 002 HALL Discipline Management System Action Sunmary Report 2000/08/21 2001/01/05 Page 18 11:53 AM ACTION: 502 STUDENT HEARING ONLY - 502 Sch 002\" 002 002 002 002 002 Student ______________ 923993 BROWN, FRANKLIM J. 927165 CYRUS, TERRELL C. 916573 HARRIS, MICHAEL D. 959119 HAYWOOD, RICKEY L. 962283 JONES, ANDREW D. 913102 ORTEGA, FRANK M. Date 9/28/00 9/18/00 9/26/00 9/06/00 9/28/00 10/18/00 Cl 09 09 12 10 09 12 Eth 02 02 02 02 02 03 Sex M M M M M M Infraction________________ 2020 UATrEH? ' 2020 BATTERY 2020 BATTERY 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 2020 BATTERY 3140 TERRORISTIC THREATENING Inf Date 9/28/00 9/18/00 9/26/00 9/06/00 9/28/00 10/18/00 ACTION: 503 STUDENT HEARING ONLY - 503 Sch 002 002 002 Student_____________________ 927233 BROWN, FLOYD L. 936B16 CONNORS, DEANDRE A. 924603 SIMPSON, CHRISTOPHE R. Date 10/19/00 10/18/00 9/12/00 Cl 09 09 10 Eth 02 02 02 Sex M M M In fraction__________________________ 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 3072 VERBAL ABUSE OF STAFF 3072 VERBAL ABUSE OF STAFF Inf Date 10/19/00 10/18/00 9/12/00 ACTION: 507 STUDENT HEARING ONLY - 507 Sch 002 Student_______________ 987741 MCMILLON/ CHASE Date 11/10/00 Cl 12 Eth 02 Sex M Infraction____________________________ 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR Inf Date 11/10/00 ACTION: 508 STUDENT HEARING ONLY - 508 Sch 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 002 Student______________________ 923743 CARROLL, SCORPIO L. 998621 CHERRY, HOLLY M. 912353 CLICK, LASHONDRA D. 924086 DIXON, CLEAVONE M. 917026 FOSTER, COURTNEY R. 928418 GRIFFIN, LARON L. 992375 JOHNSON, EARVIN B. 967585 PATTON, DARLENE A. 990177 SANTIAGO, ROBERT L. Date 10/09/00 10/11/00 9/28/00 9/14/00 10/09/00 10/16/00 10/17/00 9/28/00 10/10/00 Cl 09 10 11 10 12 09 12 09 09 Eth 02 01 02 02 02 02 02 02 06 Sex H F F M M M M F M Infraction_____ 3072 VERBAL ABUSE OF STAFF 2115 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGOR 2010 ASSAULT 3090 POSSESSION OF WEAPON 2110 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 3072 VERBAL ABUSE OF STAFF 3072 VERBAL ABUSE OF STAFF 2010 ASSAULT 3072 VERBAL ABUSE OF STAFF Inf Date 10/09/00 10/11/00 9/28/00 9/14/00 10/09/00 10/16/00 10/17/00 9/28/00 10/10/00 ACTION: 512 STUDENT HEARING ONLY - 512 Sch 002 002 002 002 Student _________________ 923699 BELCHER, NATASHA Y. 918572 JAMES, KELVIN L. 923794 JAMES, QUINTON T. 928626 NORRIS, ARLANDRIS K. Date 9/22/00 8/31/00 10/10/00 9/18/00 Cl 10 10 10 09 Sth 02 02 ' 02\n02 Sex \"T\" M M M Infraction_________________________ 3140 TERRORISTIC THREATENING 3072 VERBAL ABUSE OF STAFF 2105 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 2020 BATTERY Inf Date 9/22/00 8/31/00 10/10/00 9/18/00DML008R2 Date: 1/09/01 School 002 HALL Discipline Management System Action Summary Report 2000/06/21 2001/01/05 ACTION: PC PARENT CALLED Black White Infraction_________ MINOR ALTERCATION M 1 P 1 M F Hispanic Asian Indian Total Students Total Infractions M F M F M F M 1 P 1 M 1 F 1 Page 19 11:53 AM Total Actions M 1 F 1 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERMISSBON 2 2 2 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIRECTEVES2 1 5 3 5 3 5 3 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECTIVEa 12 12 12 5 1 5 5 5 REFUSE TO OBEY BUS RULES/REGULATIONS 1 1 1 NON-TgREATRHIMQ PROFANITY AT OR ABOUT STAFF X X .1 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Totals: 25 10 26 11 26 11 26 11 ACTION: PF PARENT CONFERENCE Black White Infraction Hispanic Asian Indian Total Students Total Infractions Total Actions BEHAVIOR THAT VIOLATES A PERSON'S RIGHTS M P 1 1 M F M P M P M F M F 1 M P 1 M F 1 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERMISSION 1 1 1 1 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIRECTEVES I 2 2 2 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECTIVEa 1 1 1 REFUSE TO OBEY BUS RULES/REGULATIONS 1 1 1 USB GP VERBAL ABUSE/FIGHTING WORDS/GEaTURES 2 2 2 VERBAL ABUSE OF STAFF 1 1 1 1 Totals: 4 1 5 4 5 4 S 4 ACTION: SW STUDENT WARNED Black White Infraction_________ MINOR ALTERCATION Hispanic Asian Indian Total Students M 13 Total Infractions M 13 Total Actions M 13 M e F 8 M 3 P M 1 F M 1 F M F F 6 F 6 F e LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WIISOUT PERMISSBON 3 3 3 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIRECTIVES1 1 1 1 29 12 30 12 30 12DML008R2 Date: 1/09/01 Discipline Management System Action Summary Report Page 20 11:53 AM School 002 HALL 2000/08/21 2001/01/05 ACTION: SW STUDENT WARNED Black White Infraction M REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECTIVM 14 M 4 F Hispanic Aslan Indian Total Students Total Infractions Total Actions M F M F M F M 23 F 14 M 25 F 14 M 25 F 14 REFUSE TO OBEY BUS RULES/REGULATIONS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 USE OR POSSESSION OF TOBACCO 1 1 1 1 USE OF VERBAL ABUSB/FIGHTING WORDS/GE9TURES 2 2 2 2 2 2 REPEATED SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES 2 2 1 3 2 3 2 3 2 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT OR ABOUTISTAFF 1 1 1 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 POSSESSION OR USE/PAGINQ DEVICE 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 Total*: 68 44 8 2 2 1 81 45 84 45 84 45 ACTION: 01 IN-SCHOOL SUSPENSION Black White Infraction_________ MINOR ALTERCATION M 2 F 3 M F Hispanic Asian Indian Total Students Total Infractions Total Actions M F M F M F M 2 F 3 M 2 F 3 M 2 F 3 BEHAVIOR THAT VIOLATES A PERSONSIRIGBTS 1 4 1 4 1 4 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WIIHOUT PERMISSION 11 5 3 1 2 28 16 29 16 29 16 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIRECTIVES 5 1 1 1 8 5 8 5 8 5 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECTIVM 17 1 1 29 18 30 18 30 19 REFUSE TO OBEY BUS RULES/REGULATIONS 1 1 1 FAILURE TO SERVE DETBNTICW 8 6 2 2 10 8 10 8 10 8 REFUSED TO SERVE DETENTION 6 4 6 4 6 4 6 4 USE OP VERBAL ABUSE/FIGHTING W0RDS/GE8TURBS 1 1 8 5 8 5 8 5 REPEATED SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES 6 11 1 1 7 12 7 12 8 12 NON-THREATENING PROFANITY AT OR ABOUT STAHF 1 1 1 REFUSING TO FOLLOW DIRECTIVES 19 9 1 19 10 19 13 19 13 Total*: 100 74 12 6 4 2 120 85 122 88 123 89DML008R2 Date: 1/09/01 Discipline Management System Action Summary Report Page 21 11:53 AM School 002 HALL 2000/08/21 2001/01/05 ACTION: 02 OUT-OP-SCHOOL(NOT EXCEED 10 DY Black White P M P Hispanic Aslan Indian Total Students Total Infractions Total Actions M F M F M P M 1 P M 1 F M r Infraction_________ MINOR ALTERCATION M 1 1 LEFT SCHOOL/CLASS WITHOUT PERMISSION 3 3 3 3 FAILURE TO FOLLOW RULES OR DIRECTIVES 2 2 2 REFUSE TO OBEY RULES OR DIRECTIVES 3 9 3 9 3 9 3 REFUSE TO OBEY BUS RULES/REGULATIONS 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 REFUSED TO SERVE DETENTiai______.JI. 1 T .1 1 _____1 _ USB OF VERBAL ABUSE/FIGHTING WORDS/GESTURES 1 1 1 1 1 1 USE/POSS. DRUGS (1ST) 1 1 1 1 REPEATED SCHOOL/CLASS TARDIES 1 1 1 1 BATTERY 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 THEFT/THBFT BY RECEIVING MUTUAL COMBAT 16 11 21 13 21 14 21 14 3 1 1 1 LOITERING OR CRIMINAL TRESPASS 3 3 3 3 1 2 1 2 1 2 VANDALISM (INTENTIONAL DESTRUCTIOH/PROPERTY) 2 NON-OHREATENING PROFANITY AT OR ABOUT7STAEF 27 28 28 REFUSING TO FOLLCW DIRECTIVES 43 21 47 22 68 25 71 25 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 26 33 34 34 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGORY ISOFFBNSES 54 64 65 6 1 1 8 9 9 3 1 1 4 2 1 6 6 6 9 9 9 HARASSING COMMUNICATIONS 2 2 2 2 REPEATED VIOLATION - CATEGORY II OFFENSES 3 3 3 FALSIFYING SIGNATURE/INFORMATION 6 2 1 2 1 4 7 4 7 4 POSSESSION OR USE OF ALCOHOL OR DHUGS 1 5 1 5 1 5 2 VERBAL ABUSE OF STAFF 1 1 1 1 Totals: 195 63 20 224 74 257 79 261 80 8 6 2 1 1 ACTION: 03 OOS (LONG TERM)/EXPULSION RCMD Black White Hispanic Aslan Indian Total Students Total Infractions Total Actions Infraction M F M P M F M F M P H P M F M FDML00eR2 Date: 1/09/01 Discipline Management System Action Summary Report School 002 HALL 2000/08/21 2001/01/05 ACTION: 05 SENT HOME Black White Hispanic Asian Indian Total Students Total Infractions Page 23 11x53 AM Total Actions F Infraction MUTUAL COMBAT M 2 M F 2 M F 2 F M F M F M F M M 2 7 NON-TOBEATENINO PROFANITY AT OR ABOUT STAFF 2 2 2 3 1 REFUSING TO FOLLCW DIRECTIVES 3 1 3 1 3 1 REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGORY I4OFFENSES 4 4 4 FALSIFYING SIGNATURE/INFORMATION 1 1 1 1 1 VPPPIT. iwigg np STAgg. X J. 1 1 POSSESSION OF FIREARM 1 1 1 1 TERRORISTIC THREATENING 1 1 1 To tala: 36 36 15 36 15 36 15 ACTION: 502 STUDENT HEARING ONLY - 502 Black White Hispanic Aslan Indian Total Students Total Infractions Total Actions 9 3 3 M 4 F M F M F M F M F M 4 F M 4 F M 4 F Infraction BATTERY 1 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 1 1 1 1 TERRORISTIC THREATENING 1 1 1 6 Totals: 5 1 6 6 ACTION: 503 STUDENT HEARING ONLY - 503 Black White Hispanic Asian Indian Total Students Total Infractions Total Actions M F M F M F M F M 1 F M 1 F M 1 F Infraction______________ REFUSING TO FOLLCW DIRECTIVES M F 1 2 VERBAL ABUSE OF STAFF 2 2 2 3 Totals: 3 3 3 ACTION: 507 STUDENT HEARING ONLY - 507 Black White Hispanic Aslan Indian Total Students Total Infractions Total Actions M F M F M F M F M 1 P M 1 F M 1 P Infraction M F REPEATED VIOLATIONS OF CATEGORY IIDFFENSES Totals: 1 1 1 1 ACTION: 508 STUDENT HEARING ONLY - 508 innEioxsatiEQSisEr aurc OMlWS. IKE 1 o a. gaau (a sSJtBSHSKQ SWICTIONS HWi ___ lOGItR'----- Lf) CEHHE Dt (DE ff QIO-HKOr 8 o JKailt i Mtey I 12 CBO 2 HK W KT 2 11 oi i Offl I cis 031) 2 W 33e2 2 IS P133' 3 \u0026gt;.! BBidt cue: \u0026lt; 3 a) C0 aBRSt ' nW B4 Ttr 1 HK *f TO SF WiT a4 ET aw w4 \u0026gt;p TOT Wff HK TS liHT TO 4 J 6 8 1 3 1 4 8 1 2 B 8 I 'I 3 1 3 2 3 1 1 1 1 K\u0026gt; in cy I CM 8 (O lisKnJ 2 7 11 RMjsy 2 1 1 6 3 13 1 12 1 X\u0026gt; 2 2 2 6 3 n 5 4 9 4 41 2 1 1 15 1 1 iij z Q. 3 a (/\u0026gt; Hs n ansn. I 1 1 4 1 5 8 S 1 2 1 1 2) 2 1 1 7 2 18 13 1 3 1 3 23 2 2 2 1 ? 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 4 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1. I 1 3) 2 2 3 B 3 1a 1 1 2 U 1 i 1 I 1 g 3s**^n- i3a SrmS 5 2 1 1 2 3 1 3 1 1 axiLansE 41 1 2 1 1 1 13 1 3 I 4 14 8 M) 1 1 1 1 1 2 IB 2 5 T! 2 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 9 fS 3 1 1 ID 2 5D 16 1 3 Z 1 1 Q \u0026gt; 1 1 3 2 3 1 1 T a 2 1 3 10 1 4 1 a 1 1 2 2 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1\u0026amp; BB IjnffiKtK 3301.1! awfc Ca/LQOl BCE 6 8zazo g SMEL CO) aZ SAWCTXONS -Bffl33E- TEBC-offcraHOr in 'J aiE M, 032 B4 ff 8 Cl o (Z rt) iKsrff 1 (j\nS C6 33CBC. HESTf? 2 2 IJr ID aisw-D Tt^. 2 jirlMJ 2 ja2 3 Qj n aans. 1 I 1 1 2 1 1 2 SK VH Bf 1 1 WP EM ' Tcr BK W TX w ------- lOGHH-WT Bl ff 'HK S TOt ff aK wr iDr CT 2 t 5. 1 1 1 2 3 5 1 1 t 3 ) 1 i 1 1 1 2 1 ) 1 1 11 T K m oI Cm O in rtsOrd 2 00 * 0/66 K aHttPt 2 gjULaHCSPL \" 8 ID 1 1 2 8 15 1 1 I 1 UJ a z\n\u0026gt; 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I J 1 I 10 1 2 3 16 1 1 2 3 5 1 1 1 11 1 2 3 13 ijraEfaKaMKOsiKEr 3JB4C OLOatt BtF. 9 s SHJIi rffi fflRWHSDQi n cBafis lit c lO 2 iW 2 0 ______ojicFsacQ\" ff HK Wl Td SANCT'iCNS tXffilHJ-- -----'lOMr 1 1 7 Hdtiro 2 0 ' 1 1 \u0026gt; I j? m I St OsOnJ J\nc 3 2 !\u0026gt; 2 3 1 ojffi ffl aarsB rt OED CBD lefiaii 3 HOffif 3 Sittoq 3 a Th* 2 55 1 J.) z Xi 'Z. d 3 1 1 8 3 3 3 7 B 1 3 3 3 2 6 3 3 3 1 3 1 i 3 1 4 2 ( i, tffi IRHMF 2 W lati^D 2 BL? 3**^ m S 2 1 ? s a on ojg\n gaoR 1 3 5 1 3 5 2 3 1 3 24 1 I 2 3 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 6 3 5 6 0 3 1 1 9 SW w tr 3 ff HK M4 ET ------IQCTSM- OW i*5 H\" TOf HK 4 * Td ttff HK TT WI i 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 4 8 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 ?. 3 1 4 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 2 3 7 3 3 3 3 C 3 3 3 1 2 3 6 5 2 3 1 3 3 3 1 36 3 o 1 3 8 itaw 3 SDK 3 lefib. 2 a tSdtin 2 MO MSB*? 2 .,. [istird 2 3^ Cffl 2 1 3 4 1 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 1 5 3 1 1 2 2 2 3 J 3 3 2 3 3 2 3D 1 3 4 2 3 30 3 3 3 3 3 a I 3 3 3 2 3 6 1 5 7 3 3 3 3 1 3 36 3 2 2 3 5 3 3aHItr OB Effl'-KnisrHO. iifU tax SHIL iiiaiwc sfl: wnmiEHfieaN^ KMIHE: a-f-i-S-y--U-) TDCfflE: IjWl n SANCTIONS OffCFSCHD:--------- ------TaGTO-- lA OtBlE Ui offi m SK KT m w wr Bl ff' w SK W W JT ii4 Bl TOT ff oo o 2 2 ZtrCHIB 2 115 122 121 13) 1 \u0026lt;d ro in oI CM (D l/y s UI Q. t-H 1=1 a=) UWGS 11 siast Riil Id) 1 HCKWF 2 CisGit) 2 9ne2 2 110 ca\u0026gt; w 115 121 OKS 12 3ECBt 3HlhaHnH\u0026gt; O/lifSl HK H4 IT Btr TO EiaUID-------- 'UMr- HIT HK MU TT U' 1 3 E. 4 Z4 1U a 5 1 6 1 1 10 1 fl 2 e 1 1 4 27 6 1 1 4 27 1 5 24 1 I 1 1 12 28 18 1 1 5 24 1 12 1 1 1 5 24 1B 4 9 1 2 9 UB 9 1Z7 IJXEEF iftK SJfllj [EEKT aaic (J/W- JKE 14 HQIDWI R/MD lAiwa gjQi\n(j2 (caawuwsHiL SANCTIONS ______nrcFsaoir g^lE B4' E ff HK W St' 3 IfiStaU I M o ERis 1 SEDsitB 1 133 \u0026lt;3 /CTUlt Bttay 2 {SO 2 C 2 MO 2 on UO K\u0026gt; Lf) O I 3 CM -.-4 O in Icte - mSKF 2 0 CisOnl 2 W I^IAd 2 IC 33e 2 2 M r(RIE 2 a VKS 3 rbW 3 OT S w\u0026gt; QJffi III z a 1=) a 4 8 4 2 i 3 7 9 3 1 1 TOf 7 8 5 3 1 3 ICT ff HK *4 IT tF ------KMSTaH-------- WK B4 ff qpy id '\u0026gt;e ____ -TCBtr 2 2 z 14 21 12 21 1 1 1 1 WC HK WK TT IT 2 2 IB 1 1 5 2 7 4 IB 36 1 1 1 3 I 1 2 1 3 1 2 1 5 1 1 8 5 3 3 5 21 a 1 7 5 41 2 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 I 1 C6 aaapt e 5? iB i\u0026gt;g7K$3 T. 010 5 SitKiro } it Baillai 1 DC 1 1 4 1 1 5 12 3 1 15 1 1 1 334 1 7 8 S 3 3 5 21 22 1 7 6 44 2 2 2 1 1 6 MD 6 2 2 23 3 7 1 1 2 2 2 2 25 3 7 1 1 2 2 11 2 0 tlijtfq Iflita: - HaHef 2 DislDO 2 W (^rtVlD 2 115 0^ ID aBSUt 2 on \u0026amp; i Kciis I 2 CO 2 on 1 4 2 1 5 7 2 3 3 1 U 4 4 2 5 J) (D M 34 5 1 1 2 1 1 1 5 5 1 1 2 7 1 V 1 I 1 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 q 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 7 12 2 3 q 15 1 1 1 11 2 1 6 4 1 2 5 59 80 5 1 1 2 7 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ID 1 2 2 5 1 1 1 1 2 11 i 7 4 2 2 (\u0026gt; 20 99 5 1 1 2 1 I 1iiffiERiKswrrasiREr 3fC iEMtra?\nDBaaaEHCfaeNcnE aaco iDo^ i(W3i q2 3301: C92 hCaUUHlOSOQl SAUCTIONS Cm u aSrCFSKOr laGTHM-Cffiao\nn.1 (HE a5 s' HK ( XT Wf WiT IM X3' ff HK (H KF KT a/a IKT M BK W4 13 XT Bffi \u0026amp; TOHi- ff MT HK rr XT xr O o DisOld 2 M tetlfio 2 IK 3 Ml t 1 2 ? OKS 11 3HCB1 IB g 36 I 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 'I. 8 1 3 1 2 e13 er t) rtflaw. i BHT 1 ItfRjls 1 kilta\nKmi 2 2 XaSJD 2 CBD OO oe (W) (SO (W) ((ft !6 OWS 12 aHOM. 1 1 1 1 1 X 1 2 9 1 1 2 1 12 1 1 1 2 2 n 2 1 1 21 1 I2 11 2 1 I 2 1 11 2 11 UO bO T 3. Cm O SHn.aafE^ 149 a 230 C 2 35 6 2 1 1 2 17 2J9 Si IxJ z I a (/\u0026gt; L lUBF.ioKaHibasiBin aiMC (MU BS 2 hwim\n'695S^'won 8/ajro 3 3110\nOP iI\u0026gt;WB53HIl\u0026gt; SANCTIONS tjjrCFSMtlr IQGTHH- O3nJH\u0026gt;- -----Tinr 3 n 3- CHBtE nt, roE 05 a HK CT' W w CT 04 BF SK TiT S F wr 34 CT ff HK M I*' CT WP HK MS CT rt 3 Cffi HBPe^ 1 ftullin 1 Tadits 1 74it 2 W 13 2 \"\u0026gt; SS 1 s Bsojri 2 HrQjffi 2 Hrdnin 1 7 1 2 1 1 1 1 9 1 2 1 3 11 1 7 D 6 4 I 4 3 12 1 11 I 2 I 1 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 a 1 2 .o n 7 Ar 2 12 2 ID 1 3 ffi 7 6 1 1 3 4 I 1 1 5 1 1 1 I? ) 1 B J ffl aBOfC M\u0026gt; 51 IC 9 1 n 5 a 1 3 6 Zi 1 2 1 1 9 1 2 1 1 4 32 V 31 1 101 ) 6 1 1 3 6 1 1 2 2 5 1 1 1 13 I 9 1 2 1 1 4 B 3 13 1 1C6 8 2 1 1 3 1 S2 wt ffllsy Helt 1 2 2 ro 2 PC 2 0 .ij z\nI .J 55 4 lldtinj IoIb: - I-fcrtiirf 2 BOW I IBKH) 2 i. li? ftptVSo 2 115 ^2 2 ta 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 3 I I 1 1 1 3 1 5 1 3 y) 4 12 2 13) VAS St 3 OB 15 4 U 21 1 4 1 4 2 3 19 4 13 2 1 4 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 I 1 2 2 19 1 1 1 4 1 5 1 1 1 1 I 5 1 10 sum iBftaJi 1 2 67 W SI 8 8 16 9 1 1 1 1 IP 1 1 I 1 3 1 1 2 13 26 1 4 1 5 1 1 a 1 1 1 2 3 6 1 1 IS 1 1 1 3 1 8 1 1 20 8 15 31 1 9 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 7 1 4 4 1 1 4 1 2 1 14 1utBEWKaoBi.asBn' aarc CBZOtli \\KF. gaiIHE: \u0026amp;az i./itt S CL aanv 0$ UILHQI^^ sanctions Deua)- .-nSr ___ iqgtbm------- om -ojrcs'sffio-\" (HBIE QL cn ff 8 Cl o iRsraF c \u0026lt;0 as ord 04 tttXfto I\n2 1. 8 i- S 2 XB Uf\u0026gt; 115 53 3 3 i IZL 11 sacftt- 1 1 5L itiiatJ ftfnis i ?e 1 to Lf) I a Cm 8 ttugai I 2 TO acarff 9 rm CisOIti KftViD (grrtw 3idc2 flrCRffi 1 X 1 1 X 1 X 3 LU 2 J li HK XN w 2 1 11 16 1 X 15 X 1. cm 2 UD 2 32 2 W ' r la 2 IS 3 OE 3 cm 3 MD I 1 1 X1 1 1 w 1 6 wr iM IT fT 0K 'ffT WIT Bl ET HK IM TOC MIT HK Wff KT BS X 6 a 12 3EP6 oiaLSdaafl' If. 31 X 1 1 2 1 I 1 1 2 's : LX X X X 1 X 3 2 1 X ZE u 2 2 1 2 1 2 4 2 1 X 1 3 2 13 2 X 1 X I 2 X U X X X 2 ffi X X X 2 1 2 1 1 2 4 14 X 1 G n 1 3 1 9 1 9 f0 3X1 36 11 45 X 1 1 1 1 ^6 1 X 1 1 1 2 1 X 33 3flS T -n 4 1 2 X 12 22 1 ?. \u0026gt; 1 2 a X X X 2 1 2 3 X 3 7 16 X 2 X 1 3 48 j2 a \u0026lt;f\u0026gt; School Short Term Suspension ANNUAL Name Central J.A. Fair Hall McClellan Metropolitan Parkview ALE ALC Cloverdale Dunbar Forest Heights Henderson Mablevale Mann Pulaski Hgts. Southwest Totals Badgett Bale Baseline Booker Brady Carver Chicot Cloverdale Dodd Fair Park Forest Park Franklin Fulbright Garland Enrolled 1855 757 790 935 %Blk 59 81 71 84 911 51 Long Term Suspension 622 771 648 724 506 858 767 510 10,654 233 362 323 597 372 596 537 512 224 248 430 464 495 271 89 57 69 86 75 52 57 83 59 92 73 83 52 63 52 69 92 65 76 48 92 48 93 BM 153 145 164 186 15 41 h____ 1 41 382 173 321 372 142 112 129 221 2,598 5 15 55 34 22 39 106 0 18 12 21 53 43 0 BF WM WF 1998 Student Hearing Office Expulsion Total 64 61 53 65 2 22 0 19 147 80 114 124 74 51 51 106 1,033 37 14 4 _____6 4 24 07 13 13 6 18 0 33 10 36 15 1 34 0 14, 32 67 81 43 23 36 19 25 469 0 2 66 5 7 22 07 3 2 3 20 14 68 11 0 18 0 __ 1 16 21 22 8 14 16 6 13 174 0 000 ___ 3 0 3 01 0114 0 TOTAL 264 222 261 277 18 115 ___ _ 75 577 341 538 547 253 215 205 365 4,274 8 24 75 44 36 50 155 0 33 28 37 63 67 0 BM ____2q 8 28 ____ 12 34 0 10 31 27 7 33 21 7 6 ____31 248 1 21 1 _____ 1j 1 7 01 0 _____q 1 _____ i_ 1 BF__ 13 9 5 __ ____ 1_ 0 0 3 13 9 13 8 13 13 ___12 104 ____ 1_ ____12 ____q 0 0 ____q 0 0 5 0 ____q ____q 0 WM 0 0 ___4 ___ 0 ___ 0 ___001 ___36311 ___ 1_ ___4 ___ 5 29 ___ 0 ___01 ___ 0 ___ 0 0 ___ 0 ___ 0 21 ___ 0 ___ 0 __ 0 WF 01 0 01 0 0 02 30 20 00 2 11 00 0 00 0 1 0 0 00 10 0 TOTAL 33 18 ____ 37 ____ 13 _____ 5 4 0 14 ____ 45 ____ 23 44 35 _____ 9 13 ____ 50 392 _____ 2 _____ 34 _____ 1_ 1 _____ 1 _____803 6 _____ q _____ 2 _____21 BM 23 3 6 ____4 10 ____0 0 ____8 ____9 53 51 0 ____2 70 0 ____0 ____01 00 0 ____1_ 00 ____0 0 0 ___ 0 0 BF 1 1 0 00 00 02 32 1 6 0 3 2 21 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 1 WM ___ 2 ___ 0 ___010 ___ ___00 ___ 0 ___012 01 ___ 0 ___ 0 __ 8_ ___ 0 ___ a 0 ___ 0 0 ___ q ___ q ___q0 ___q0 ___ q ___q0 WF 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 01 0 0 0 00 0 1 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 _0 00 00 TOTAL ______ 26 _______ 4 _______ 6 _______ 5 _______ I _______ 1 _______ q 0 ______ 10 ______ 8 _______ 6 ______ 11 _______ 2 _______ 4 4 _______q _______ q 0 0 _______ q _______ q 1 _______ q 0 _______ q _______ q _______ q _______ q 1 #Blk 274 227 256 268 22 _____67 1 73 583 301 462 541 261 172 192 374 4,074 _____10 25 72 _____39 _____29 ____ 138 ______q 26 _____3q _____34 _____eq _____62 2 %Blk 85% 93% 84% 91% 100% 56% 100% 82% 92% 75% 81% 91% 87% 76% 87% 89% 84% 100% 93% 91% 87% 78% 86% 84% 0% 72% 88% 92% 92% 90% 100% Page 2 School Name Geyer Spgs. Gibbs Jefferson King Mabelvale McDermott Meadowcliff Mitchell Otter Creek Pulaski Hgts. Rightsell Rockefeller Romine Terry_______ Wakefield Washington Watson Western Hills Williams Wilson Woodruff Totals G Total 97/98 G Total 97/98 Difference Enrolled 316 311 513 658 407 477 332 242 328 464 249 450 328 511 373 660 493 315 479 362 284 14,216 24,886 24,986 100 % 75 52 44 54 73 57 79 92 46 55 94 59 63 46 86 53 89 70 52 82 71 65 67 66 1998 Student Hearing Office BM Short Term Suspension BF WM WF TOTAL Long Term Suspension BM BF Expulsion Total 7 97 30 55 12 22 8 16 37 16 28 6 39 23 12 93 18 1 42 _____9 913 3511 3,297 214 11 11 10 14 9 4 5 2 23 5 93 6 17 5 8 0 16 1 285 1318 1,320 -2 3 2 0 7 22 2 1 1 14 0 15 5 4 03 10 8 0 0 3 156 625 653 -28 1 0 066110 00 0211 00 4 0 000 36 210 216 -6 22 12 8 53 97 24 28 14 19 64 21 54 15 50 40 20 123 34 1 58 13 1390 5664 5,486 178 1 00 010 2 0 0103243 9 2 a01 1 48 296 319 -23 1 0 0 0100 1 0 0 00 0 0010 0 00 0 13 117 79 38 WM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 51 0 0 0 0 16 45 41 4 WF ____000 0100 000 000100 10 00 0 5 16 14 2 TOTAL 2 0 0 1 3 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 4 7 3 15 4 0 0 1 1 82 474 453 21 BM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1716","title":"Court filings: District Court, motion for pre-trial order; District Court, Joshua intervenors' response to motion for pretrial order; District Court, two orders; District Court, Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) Baker (Elementary School) recruitment plan; District Court, motion for extension of time to respond to the Baker recruitment plan; District Court, Joshua intervenors' objections to Baker recruitment plan; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool; District Court, order","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["2001-07"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Joshua Intervenors","Little Rock School District","Baker Interdistrict School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Arkansas. Department of Education","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School management and organization","School enrollment"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings: District Court, motion for pre-trial order; District Court, Joshua intervenors' response to motion for pretrial order; District Court, two orders; District Court, Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) Baker (Elementary School) recruitment plan; District Court, motion for extension of time to respond to the Baker recruitment plan; District Court, Joshua intervenors' objections to Baker recruitment plan; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool; District Court, order"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1716"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["4 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MOTION FOR PRE-TRIAL ORDER For its Motion, Little Rock School District (LRSD) states: RECEIVED .JlJL 1 o '7h01 _O.OUC f .. ... . , PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS 1. The Court directed counsel for the Joshua interveners on Friday not to directly contact LRSD employees concerning this case. On Saturday, counsel for the Joshua interveners called an LRSD employee at home to discuss the case. 2. The Court also directed the Joshua interveners to provide LRSD a witness list by Friday subject to revision of the witness list on Monday. Joshua provided a list on Friday afternoon which listed twenty-five people as witnesses, and additional seven people \"tentative witnesses\" and noted that Joshua also intended to call \"the monitor and associate monitors of the ODM\". Counsel for Joshua said by telephone and confirmed in a letter that Joshua's witnesses for Thursday and Friday would be five LRSD witnesses as well as Ann Marshall, Gene Jones and Horace Smith from the Office of Desegregation monitoring. LRSD confirmed in writing that the witnesses would be available and asked Joshua to provide the order of their expected testimony so that arrangements could be made to have them in Court at the appropriate time. 3. Counsel for Joshua also said by telephone and confirmed in writing that Dr. Lesley would not be needed as a witness until the August hearing dates. LRSD confirmed in writing that - Dr. Lesley will not be available until the August hearing dates. 4. On Monday afternoon, counsel for Joshua added ten names to his witness list bringing Joshua's total number of witnesses to forty-five. 5. Counsel for Joshua requested time to \"interview\" for LRSD witnesses on Monday evening or Tuesday. Joshua was informed that two of the witnesses were out of town and that the other two were busy preparing the hearing. 6. On June 10, 1998, LRSD and Joshua made the following agreement with respect to Joshua's participation in implementing and monitoring the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan: For fees and costs incurred for implementing and monitoring the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan, LRSD will reimburse your firm up to $48,333 .33 per year for three years beginning July 1, 1998. The Revised Desegregation and Education Plan contained a process by which Joshua could bring to the attention ofLRSD, and ultimately the Court, and problems with LRSD' s implementation of the plan. No such problems were brought to the Court's attention during the entire three-year period. LRSD filed an interim compliance report in March of2000 which showed that LRSD was in compliance with its obligations under the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan. Joshua filed no response or objection to the interim compliance report. LRSD' s final compliance report was filed on March 15, 2001 . Joshua was given until May 18, 2001 to file objections and a hearing was set for July 5 and 6, 2001. Joshua's deadline for filing objections was extended twice and the objections were filed on June 25, 2001. Within the past two weeks, Joshua has sent dozens of FOI requests seeking thousands of pages of documents many of which were previously provided to Joshua, many of which were produced by committees which contained Joshua representatives and all of which Joshua could easily have reviewed months ago in accordance with the LRSD's 2 agreement to reimburse Joshua's fees for implementing and monitoring the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan. During the last two weeks, Joshua representatives have also met personally and by telephone with the LRSD Administrators responsible for drafting the Compliance Report. 7. After the close of business on Monday evening, Joshua sent two faxes. The first added eleven names to Joshua's witness list, which now totals fifty-six. Joshua has apparently still not made a final determination about the exhibits to be presented at trial. The second fax purports to rescind Joshua's agreement that Dr. Leslie would not be called as a witness on Thursday or Friday. Apparently in retaliation for LRSD's inability to present witnesses for \"interviews\" at the last minute, counsel for Joshua threatened to subpoena Dr. Leslie to appear on Friday. This can only be because of counsel's knowledge that Dr. Leslie is willing to appear on Thursday but must attend a family reunion in Texas on Friday. 8. The Court expressed on Friday the hope and the expectation that counsel for the parties would be able to resolve any pre-trial issues. That has not happened. LRSD must now request that the Court limit Joshua's presentation on Thursday and Friday to the five LRSD witnesses originally requested as well as the representatives of the Office of Desegregation Monitoring, and that the Court require reasonable witness and exhibit lists and establish the parameters for any remaining discovery in this case, including the opportunity for LRSD to depose the witnesses from outside the district who were added last night to Joshua's witness list. WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth above, LRSD prays for an order limiting the presentation of witnesses on Thursday and Friday to those originally identified by Joshua, establishing deadlines for providing exhibit lists and reasonable witness lists, establishing a pre-trial process to determine the expected length of trial and providing reasonable limitations on the issues 3 to be presented at trial and on the length of the trial, and establishing a deadline for the completion of any remaining discovery. Respectfully submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026 CLARK 2000 Regions Center 400 West Capitol Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3493 (501) 376-2011 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Christopher Heller, hereby certify that a copy of the above and foregoing pleading has been served upon: by mailing a copy of same by U. S. Postal Service on July 3, 2001. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the following on this 3rd day of July 3, 2001 : Mr. John W. Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell Law Firm 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 M. Samuel Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 200 NationsBank 200 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, AR 72201 5 Ms. Ann Brown Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Sammye Taylor Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES 3400 TCBY Tower 425 Capitol Avenue ock, AR 72201 RECEIVED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V NO. 4: 82CV00866 SWW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. - KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. JOSHUA INTERVENORS' RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR PRETRIAL ORDER JUL 5 -1001 OfflCEOf DESEGREGAl\\ON MONUOUI PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTER VEN ORS INTER VEN ORS Comes now the Joshua Intervenors, for their response to LRSD' s Motion for Pretrial Order, and state that Joshua is just in receipt ofLRSD's motion to limit evidence and to prevent a fair hearing. Since the court orders on Friday, June 29, 2001, the District has sought to obstruct and preclude the Joshua Intervenors from obtaining information and having access to witnesses. The District's counsel has made himself unavailable to be responsive to the reasonable requests of the Intervemors for information and access to personnel. This is the same vein in which LRSD's sought to lull Intervenors counsel's into the belief that counsel was preceding to undertake settlement negotiations in good faith. It is now evident that the settlement negotiations were delayed, and not otherwise conducted in good faith in an effort to prevent Intervemors' counsel from having access to information. The Motion for Pre-Trial Order is untimely and designed - further to interfere with Intervenors' counsel's ability to prepare for hearing set for Thursday. LRSD's motion is a motion for reconsideration of the court's ruling wherein the court required the LRSD to make its personnel reasonable accessibility to Joshua so that neither side would be subject to surprise during the trial. WHEREFORE, the Joshua Intervenors pray that the court reinforce its order requiring the LRSD to cooperate with the Joshua Intervenors, in the manner established during the years of this litigation so that the court can have the benefit of actual facts and evidence to enable the court to make her judgments herein. Respectfully submitted, John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 501-374-3758 501-374-4187 (fax) Sii:::t~~fe CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I do hereby state that a copy of the foregoing response has been faxed to Mr. Chris Heller at 376-2147 and Ms. Ann Brown at 371-0100 and copies sent to other counsel ofrecord via United States mail, postage prepaid on this 3\" day of~ 'ti!; y('~ FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT .A.RKANSAS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION JUL O 9 2001 JA_MESJW.~\\CORMACK CLERK By. \\v ,~\\l [\\ C\\I\\ ~C\u003e D PCLERK LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT vs. NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL MRS. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL JUL 11 2001 OffiCEOf DESE6REGATJON MONITORING 0 RD ER PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTER VENO RS INTERVENORS On July 5th and 6th , 2001 , a hearing was conducted pursuant to Little - Rock School District's request for the Court to declare it t o be in unitary status and Joshua's objections thereto. The evidence not being completed, the hearing with respect to the issues of achievement and discipline will continue on August 1, 2001, at 9:00 a.m., and proceed until noon on August 2, 2001. The deadline for the mutual exchange of witness and exhibit lists shall be no later than July 2 4, 2001. Thereafter, the remainder of the hearing on the issues of achievement and discipline will continue on November 19th and 20th , 2001, at 9:00 a.m., if necessary. The parties are to exchange lists o f any additional witnesses or exhibits no later than November 1, 2001. A hearing on additional issues in this matter is hereby scheduled to begin on Monday, January 28, 2002, at 9:00 a.m., if necessary. For P. 1 :14 5 4 i, - 2 - this hearing, witness and exhibit lists are to be exchanged no later than January 4, 2002. IT IS SO ORDERED this '11t\\_ day of~' 2001. S~B8u.~~ Chief United States District Judge THIS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET IN COMPLIANCE WITH RULl;.58 AND/OR 79(a) FRCP ON 2:ID-0 J sv___.Ttr\"---t---- RECEIVED ttrric~ ..... VITI f: !.Jr COURT FILED \u00266REGATIOM IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION U.S. DISTRICT COURT '=ASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL JUL 1 0 2001 JAMESJ. M~RMACK, CLERK By: \\ , -....U /\\ (\\/\\ fl..A DEP ~LEf$.-. vs. NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL No. 4:82CV00866 SWW ORDER Pending before the Court is a motion for a pretrial order filed by Little Rock School District which appears to be moot at this time pursuant to the order entered this date setting forth deadlines for the mutual exchange of witness and exhibit lists prior to the hearings that currently are scheduled in this matter. The Clerk is directed to make the necessary docket entry removing said motion from the pending motions' report in this matter. Dated this 10~ day of July, 2001. THIS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET IN COMPLIANCE WITH RULE: 58 AND/OR 79(a) FRCP ON 7--f0 - 0/ BY lJt:: SUS WEBERWRIGirr' Chief United States District Judge \"\"\" . t J4 5 5 I, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. NO. 4:82CV00866SWW PULASKI COlJNrv S~PE CIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KA THERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. BAKER RECRUITMENT PLAN RECEIVED JUL 16 2001 OFFICE OF DESmREGATION MONITOill PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS There has been significant demand by LRSD minority students for seats at Baker Elementary over the past several years. Exhibit 1 is a copy of the most recent enrollment projection for Baker. The conversion of Baker to a middle school frees up the two sixth grade classrooms. The PCSSD proposes to add an additional kindergarten class for the 2001-2002 school year to be followed by the addition of yet another kindergarten class for the following school year. This would give Baker, in year 2, three first grade classes and three kindergarten classes. These classes would then be \"rolled up\" year by year until the first entering kindergarten class matriculated in the fifth grade and the process would then start over. The PCSSD believes that the emphasis upon recruiting at kindergarten over two years is the most practical approach it can take. It believes that attracting children at this level before they are settled into other schools is both rational and the most reasonable strategy to deploy. 249234-v1 Baker needs to recruit only about 22 additional minority children over two years to attain an enrollment that is safely 20% minority 1 . The PCS SD believes that this strategy, as outlined above, will accomplish this objective.2 The PCSSD believes that the construction of the new activities complex, approved by this Court, will facilitate and ---~!lhance it~ current recT~i!i!1] _effort_s. A~ a source for new students, the District's recruitment strategy will be narrowly focused as described below. Recruiting Target A new apartment complex for low income housing was completed recently at 15000 Chenal Parkway approximately one-half mile from Baker Elementary. The name of the complex is \"Chenal Park\". It is on the border of the PCSSD and LRSD. Chenal Park contains 176 two and three bedroom apartments for low income families. Information supplied by the LRSD reveals that the LRSD currently educates 48 elementary-aged minority students from Chenal Park of whom 40 are currently assigned to Terry with the remainder scattered among other schools, principally the stipulation magnet schools. (Exhibit 2). In the last two years, school-aged children from Chenal Park have applied to attend Baker under the assumption that its proximity to their homes meant it was their neighborhood school. Until now, the PCSSD has not had room at Baker to accommodate all of these requests. Because of Baker's proximity to Chenal Park, its reputation, the enhancements to the campus that the Court has approved and because of the prior interest expressed by - 1 This, of course, is a minimum goal. However, the PCSSD believes this to be a reasonable initial goal for this on-going effort. 2 Ideally, the PCSSD could commit the funds to add a class at each grade level. However, the recent millage defeat and the allegation made by some that Baker is an \"identifiably white\" school has dissuaded the District from this proposition. 249234-v1 2 some residents of Chenal Park, the PCSSD believes that this recruitment effort over a period of two years should bring Baker into compliance with its racial balance goals. The PCSSD has scheduled a \"registration carnival\" to be held at Baker on August 1, 2001. The publicity for this event has been targeted to Chenal Park. August 1st is the first day of PCSSD's three-day registration period. Thus, this timing will permit - - - - - -- --. -- - ---- - -- --- the PCSSD to prefer potential M to M students from Chenal Park before the PCSSD must commit any remaining seats to applicants from within its attendance zone. 249234-v1 Respectfully submitted, WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS LLP 200 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3699 (501) 371-0808 FAX: (501) 376-9442 By __:__...:;....,1 _ ___;;;_.....:..;1=-------M. A Sc 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On July 13, 2001, a copy of the foregoing was served via U.S. mail on each of the following: Mr. John W. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway -- Little Rock, Arkansas 7220f --. - Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 2000 First Commercial Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Ms. Ann Brown Marshall ODM One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell Law Firm P.O. Box 17388 Little Rock, Arkansas 72222-7388 Ms. Sammye L. Taylor Mr. Mark A. Hagemeier Arkansas Attorney General's Office 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 249234-v1 M.S~onesll 4 07 / 12/!ll f.Iru 15: 46 FAX -~141002 Memo . ... _ To: From: Date: Re: STUDENT REGISTRATION OFFICE Chris Heller x/ /\\ J Julie Wiedo~er, Director of Student Reg-istrati~O v eJ unes~~ ~ Requ.~~~ for Student Information Pursuant to our telephone conversation yesterday, I have determined that there have been at least 40 Little Rock School District students who have applied through the M to M Transfer application for a school assignment at Baker Elementary School in the Pulaski County Special School District over the past four years and who have not been enrolled. The County's inability to place our M to M students at Baker has been related to a lack of scat capacity after they have placed the Baker zone students. Our data for the 2001-02 school year shows a total of27 Little Rock School District M to M students assigned to Baker, including no kindergartners and only two 1st graders. Pulaski County Special School District has requested the number of elementary students currently on our database living at the apartment complex at l.5000 Chenal Parkway. There are 48 black students and 12 non-black students and 40 of these students are attending Terry Elementary school, the attendance zone school for that area. The remaining 20 are attending Williams, Carver, Booker, King and Washington magnet schools, as well as McDermott, Fulbright and Dodd attendance zone schools. All of these schools are racially balanced. CC: Junious Babbs, Associate Supcdntendent for Administrative Services EXHIBIT I 501 SHERMAN STREET - LITTLE ROCK AR. 72202 - P.HONE: 32~2272 - FAX: 324-2281 - - - .. . al --.J '- PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT I-'. ! w Enrollment ProiecUons - 2001-2002 Revised 05-21-01 i '-' Iv C1ass PRE-K KIND. FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH FIFTH SIXTH TOTA\\. ELEMENTARY a:19 .a..l. . Capacity DLK WHT TOT BLK WJIT TOT BLK WlIT ror BLK WBT TOT BLK WOT TOT BLK \\VDT T\u003cJf fiLK WIIT 1'0T BLK WJIT ror BLK \" WBT ,,. TOT ~LEMENTARY SCHOOLS CS) .C.D I-' .DIJNS 370 16 4 20 16 4 20 29 19 48 23 18 41 21 11 44 19 20 39 25 22 47 0 0 0 155 60% 104 40% 259 I-' illNOLDDR. 420 0 0 0 ts Gl 77 15 62 77 11 6S 76 I4 41 62 17 44 61 J-4 47 \" 0 0 0 86 21~ 328 1''il, -414 IAXER 330 0 0 0 6 34 40 6 34 40 7 37 44 7 41 4\u0026 2 46 48 10 30 -4(1 0 0 0 38 15~ 222 \u0026s'il, uo U1 al I-' IATBS 750 31 n 54 31 23 54 43 43 16 47 '7 94 48 3:5 83 51 46 97 12 S8 J'.lO 0 0 0 323 S4'1\u003e 27S 46~ S'JS I ~ IAYOUMETO \" 0 0 0 4 61 n 4 6B n 2 83 15 3 11 80 2 90 n 2 75 77 0 0 0 17 4'1, 461 96'11 478 \u003c.D al I :ATO 576 0 0 0 15 49 64 JS 49 64 10 68 78 16 46 62 20 59 79 16 54 70 0 0 0 92 2291- 325 78'1, 411 I-' w :LINTON 8l3 31 33 71 38 33 71 37 41 78 42 49 91 59 52 111 41 48 89 S9 52 lit 0 0 0 314 50% U1 308 50% 622 Iv '.:OLLl!GESTA 34-0 0 0 0 6 3 9 4 6 10 9 3 12 II 2 13 27 19 46 20 lO 50 0 0 0 77 SS% 63 45% 140 CRYSI\"ALIUL uo 29 24 53 29 24 53 46 54 JOO 53 49 102 41 47 9S ,1 49 96 54 52 ,~ 53 59 111 359 50% 3S\u0026 50% 717 DUPIIJ!R 465 0 0 0 13 39 52 13 39 .52 15 31 46 ll 34 47 20 49 69 12 37 49 0 0 0 86 17% 229 7311, 315 IJ..UUUS 525 0 0 (I 12 10 22 12 10 22 16 12 78 16 12 28 21 7 34 29 21 50 0 0 0 112 61~- 72 :w;i. 184 l'VILU .ELE.\"1 715 0 0 0 62 4, 111 62 49 Ill 45 SI ,6 j5 38 93 54 45 99 51 40 91 0 0 0 329 5$\\l, 272 45',/, 001 l.ANDllfARK 568 11 18 3S 11 u lS 24 26 50 25 26 SI 22 28 ,o 30 37 61 35 34 69 0 0 0 170 48111, 187 52% 3S7 111 LAWSON 325 0 9 40 49 9 40 49 3 32 JS 8 24 32 7 34 41 ' 11 36 0 0 0 45 19~ 197 81',\\ 242 ) C H JAKGROVJU 476 17 55 72 17 55 n 9 .(0 .(9 12 41 SJ 11 33 44 JO 33 43 14 41 55 14 37 51 104 24~ 335 76\\l- .. 439 --1 \u003c DAirnROOKB 500 0 0 0 II 27 38 11 27 38 18 33 51 21 )6 51 14 41 55 14 27 41 0 0 0 \u00269 32% 191 6S% 280 lJ C ~JNRFORIISf 556 0 16 44 w 16 4' 60 JO 5-2 62 13 31 so 10 73 83 II 53 M 21 65 116 91 21% 361 19% 6:5 lJ H r ~INJ!.WOOO 5l3 0 0 0 12 54 76 12 54 16 n 38 61 22 4\u0026 70 22 411 10 30 39 69 0 0 0 141 3J'ilo 211 67% 422 lf) lWBIN. ELEM. 459 0 s 39 47 ' 41 .:so ~ 39 48 14 43 S1 15 41 51 15 47 62 0 0 0 10 21')1, 251 78'i1, 321 111 ;o \u003c SCOTI 180 0 4 19 23 4 l9 2) 8 21 29 7 10 17 8 10 18 7 JI 18 0 0 0 38 30,t 90 7(111, 118 H () 111 SRl!Jl \\\\'0OD 460 0 )9 37 SC, 19 37 56 19 33 52 16 37 53 20 43 (i3 19 33 52 0 0 0 112 34'll\u003e 220 6~1' 3]2. SYL. IDLl.S El 456 0 11 38 s~ 18 38 56 11 33 44 21 19 so 22 45 67 25 46 71 0 0 0 11:5 339, 2:2.9 67'l 344 TAYLOR uo 0 21 3S 56 21 35 56 19 36 55 JO JI 61 30 36 66 22 32 54 0 0 0 143 4191, 205 59'1- 348 l'OLLl!SON 570 0 0 0 13 46 59 13 '6 S9 15 51 66 11 48 6.5 20 47 61 14 40 54 0 0 0 92 l!i'll, 278 7S'l, 310 T01\"AJ.11L~t. U81 141 157 .l415 421 150 tl72 461 921 1312 452 943 1400 519 853 nn 535 1011 1546 51JI 941 1527 88 161 l49 32Al~ 35~ S1149 65% ,e53 lJ l\u003e EXHIBIT G) 111 I I al Iv '- CS) Iv -- - --- UFILEO EASTElN '6\\i~~',g. COURT ARKANSAS JUL 2 6 2001 ~AMES W. McCORMACK IN THE UNJTED STATES DISTRICT cctDR1 CLEF~K EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS DEP CLERK WESTERN DMSION LITTLE'ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V NO. 4:82CV00866 SWW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL RECEIVED DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. JUL 2 7 2001 INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. OFFICE OF INTERVENORS DESEGREGATION MONITORIN\u0026 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE BAKER RECRUITMENT PLAN Come now the Joshua Intervenors, by and through undersigned counsel, for their Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Baker Recruitment Plan, state: 1. Counsel is preparing in the instant case for a hearing scheduled for next week, August 1, 2001. 2. This request is not made for purposes of delay. 3. Undersigned counsel has been unsuccessful in contacting counsel for the Pulaski County Special School District to determine whether he has objections to this request. WHEREFORE, the Joshua Intervenors pray that the Court enters an Order extending the time in which they may respond to the Baker Recruitment Plan up to and including July 30, 2001. Respectfully submitted, John W. Walker, P.A. 1 723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 (501):-J)3758 By ~ fi'Wdl~ John W. Walker - Bar No. 64046 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I do hereby state that a copy of the foregoing motion has been sent to all counsel of record on this 26th day ofJuly, 2001 via United States m , postage prepaid. fY, W'ttt\u0026~ RECEIVED AUG 1 2001 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS JUL 3 0 2001 OfRCEOF QESEGREGATION MONITORING EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JAMES W. McCORMACK CLERK WESTERN DMSION By: ' DEP CLERK LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF v. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. DEFENDANTS JOSHUA INTERVENORS' OBJECTIONS TO BAKER RECRUITMENT PLAN The Court entered an order on June 5, 2001 where it approved defendant's motion for permission to add an activities complex in Baker Interdistrict school. The Court noted that the defendants had asserted \"that the addition of an activities complex would enhance recruitment of minority students to Baker ... \" The Order was not a final one for purposes of appeal. Accordingly, the Court noted the Joshua Intervenors' objections in Footnote 2 of the Order and called attention to Section J of the plan by which the defendants are now reportedly operating their school. The Court did not address the Joshua question of the possibility that private donations may not be used to establish \"separate but unequal schools\". The Court required the Defendant PCSSD to file a report \"setting forth how it intends to improve racial balance at Baker and how it is going about meeting its obligation of Section J of Plan 2000. The Court further [ directed] the PCS SD to set forth target dates for the completion of these obligations. The defendants have now submitted their recruitment plan. The Joshua Intevenors observe that the Court required a report which set forth how the district intends to meet its obligation under Section J and directed a target date for completion of the obligation. The Joshua Intervenors do not believe that the defendants have complied with the -1- Court's requirements. The defendants propose the following: a) There will be no recruitment. This is so because enough Little Rock students who reside within the Chenal Park area have applied for entry to Baker but have not been admitted before now because Baker did not have sufficient space to accommodate b) c) d) e) their requests. If PCS SD recruitment does occur, it will be at the kindergarten level only, and be spread over a two year period. It will involve only 22 Little Rock minority children, a number which will cause the Baker enrollment to eventually be 20% minority. It will not involve and be limited to those pupils who apply during recruitment of black students from the Little Rock District as a whole. It will involve the \"registration carnival\" targeted to occur on August 1st . The Joshua objections at the least are as follows pending a hearing: a) The defendants' response is totally insufficient in that it to meet the explicit orders of the Court. b) The defendants seek to limit the geographic area of Little Rock from which minority students may be selected or, may themselves make a choice of their own for school attendance. Joshua objects to transfers from the Little Rock School District of minority students being limited to the Chenal area or, for that matter to low income minority children. c) The purported recruitment plan imposes no affirmative obligations upon the -2- d) defendants, or for that matter the Little Rock School District, to recruit minority students to Baker, by number, method of recruitment, or by date of recruitment. The defendants allege that they have not admitted more minority students to Baker, despite the applications of minority students for Baker from Little Rock, because the PCSSD \"has not had room at Baker to accommodate all of [their] requests\". This proposition is factually incorrect on its face. See the ODM report on capacity. Baker does not now appear to be at or near capacity. Indeed, Baker has space to accommodate, without class additions 70 students. It could easily accommodate more than 40 black applicants in grades kindergarten through fifth with ease at one time. Accommodation of only 40 black applicants, assuming that the defendants' projections are otherwise correct, would mean that Baker would experience a racial balance of74% white and 26% black for the next school year. The District's proposal to limit placement of black students in kindergarten classes is totally unreasonable and negative to desegregation objectives. Furthermore, the school district proposes to add two kindergarten and effectively an additional first grade class. This undoubtedly would result in between 60 and 75 additional students for a total enrollment 335 students with a net result of Baker's enrollment being only 17% - up from 15% - rather than 20%. Joshua submits that the Baker plan is simply a plan to further enrollment options for majority race students at Baker. Joshua further submits to obtain preliminary Court approval for expanding the basic enrollment capacity of Baker and to enlarge the Baker attendance zone in order to accommodate the increased demand being made by white pupils. -3- e) There is no justification submitted by PCS SD for disallowing primary grade minority students' attendance at Baker as proposed by the defendants. f) The defendants did not set forth as required target dates for the completion of its obligations. Specifically, the defendants did not consult the Joshua Intervenors nor did they otherwise meet the Court's expectations before they submitted their report. g) The defendants' plan requires a minimal goal of 20% for an interdistrict school. The Joshua Intervenors further believe that they are entitled to have an evidentiary hearing before school for which they pray. At that time the defendants should be required to sufficiently . demonstrate the actions which it has taken in response to the Order of the Court. Joshua notes that the response of the defendant is from defendant's counsel; it is without affidavit support and the factual representations may not be subject to examination because they have been lawyer generated. WHEREFORE, the Joshua Intervenors respectfully request that the defendants' \"Baker Recruitment Plan\" be disapproved, because it is not in compliance with the Court's Orders of June 5, 2001 ; that the defendants be directed not to accept any new white students for registration for Baker pending further Orders of the Court; that the defendants be required to develop and implement an effective recruitment plan which affords Little Rock School District minority students immediate transfer options and to assure that such persons electing to transfer will be treated on equally favorable terms as PCSSD Baker attendance zone white children; and that the Court schedule a hearing, before the beginning of school, so that the defendants may report upon the actual progress and results that the district has achieved. The Joshua Intervenors further requests that the defendants be specifically required to involve the Joshua Intervenors in all planning and implementation activities of the school district to the extent that same is required by the revised desegregation plan -4- approved by the Court, pendente lite. By: Respectfully submitted, JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 (501) 374-3758 (Tel.) (501) 74- 187 (Fax) J CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing has been mailed, postage prepaid to the following counsel or record, postage prepaid on this M day of July, 2001. Mr.M. SamuelJones,ill Wright, Lindsey \u0026 Jennings 200 West Capitol Avenue Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3699 Ms. Ann Brown Marshall ODM One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell Law Firm P.O. Box 17388 Little Rock, Arkansas 72222-7388 -5- Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 400 W. Capitol, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jones, Lyon \u0026 Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Ms. Sammye L. Taylor Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 \\ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DMSION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF v. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of ADE's Project Management Tool for July, 2001. RECEIVED JUL 3 0 2001 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORINQ Respectfully Submitted, MARK.PRYOR Attorney General Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 20 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 682-3643 Attorney for Arkansas Department of Education CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Mark A. Hagemeier, certify that on July 27, 2001, I caused a copy of the foregoing document to be served by U.S. mail, postage prepaid, on the following person(s) at the address(es) indicated: M. Samuel Jones, ill Wright, Lindsey \u0026 Jennings 2000 NationsBank Bldg. 200 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 :TohnW. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway LittleRock, AR 72201 Richard Roachell P.O. Box 17388 Little Rock, AR 72222-7388 Timothy G. Gauger Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026 Woodyard 425 West Capitol Ave. Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 72201-3525 Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 2000 Regions Center 400 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 s'tepheri w. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026 Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Ann Marshall One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 - -------- IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1763","title":"Court filings regarding motion for extension of time, Joshua intervenors' arguments concerning funding of Office of Desegregation Management (ODM), Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) response to appellants' motion to stay, and Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool.","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit"],"dc_date":["2007-07/2007-08"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st century","School districts","Little Rock School District","Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","Joshua intervenors","Education--Finance","Arkansas. Department of Education","Project management"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings regarding motion for extension of time, Joshua intervenors' arguments concerning funding of Office of Desegregation Management (ODM), Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) response to appellants' motion to stay, and Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool."],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1763"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["40 page scan, typed"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\u003c?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"utf-8\"?\u003e\n\u003citems type=\"array\"\u003e \u003citem\u003e \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_description type=\"array\"\u003e \n\n\u003cdcterms_description\u003eCourt filings: Court of Appeals, motion for extension of time; District Court, response to Joshua intervenors' arguments concerning funding of Office of Desegregation Management; District Court, letter-order; District Court, order; Court of Appeals, Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) response to appellants' motion to stay; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool; District Court, order; District Court, amended order; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project mangement tool This transcript was create using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT RECEIVED JUL -9 2007 OFFICEOF DESEGREGATION MONITORING LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF/,\\PPELLEE V. CASE NO. 07-1866 JOSHUA INTERVENORS, ET AL. DEFENDANTS/APPELLANTS MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Come the Joshua Intervenors, et al., by and through undersigned counsel, and respectfuU~, request an additional fifteen (15) days in order to allow time to have this matter resolved between the parties as set forth by the Court's Order Qr in which to have appellant's brief filed. This request is made with the understanding that no further extensions for filing appellant's brief would be requested or allowed in the event that this matter was not 1Iediated or otherwise disposed of. , Appellant's counsel has been unable to make direct contact with appellee's counsel on either !uly 5 or July 6, 2007 and can not state whether appellee's counsel objects to Lll! delay. There is no prejudice to the appellee by the request. Respectfully Submitted, ls/John W. Walker John W. Walker, AR Bar #64046 JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 (501) 374-3758 (501) 374-4187 (fax) Email: johnwalkeratty@aol.com Robert Pressman 22 Locust A venue Lexington, Mass 02421 (781) 862-1955 Certificate of Service ' I, John W _ Walker, do hereby state that on this 6th day of July, 2007, a copy o:f the foregoing Motion has been electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using the C M/EF, which.shall send notification of such filing to the following: Christopher J. Heller heller@fec.net brendak@fec.net tmiller@fec.net M. SatnuelJones,m siones@mwsgw.com aoverton@mwsgw.com Stephen W. Jones sjones@jlj .com linda.calloway@jli.com Scott Paris Richardson . Scott.richardson@arkansasag.gm: agcivil@arkansasag.gov and to the following counsel via United States Mail, postage prepaid: Mr. Norman J. Chachkin NAACP Legal Defense \u0026amp; Educational Fund, Inc. - New York 99 Hudson Street Suite 1600 New York, NY 10013 Mr. Margie Powell Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 ls/John W. Walker 07/13/2007 14:13 5016045237 USDC Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4131 FilAn 011111200? IN Tl IE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EA.STERN DIS .l .l(ICr 0.t AKKAMSA:S W .b:sT~KN Vl V 1:SION PAGE 03 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT . PLAINTIFF v. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL . DEFENDANTS INTER VENO RS INTER VEN ORS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATIIERlNE KNIGIIT, ET AL RESPONSE TO JOSHUA INTERVENOR'S A n.rTJ'l .1 .,-.~.,..,...... ~,..,..,..,-.,-..\"'-,.,... ,..,..,.Y,...9-- --. _,..._, I 00YuJ.1u .. c11:1 \"''''\"--'.\u0026amp;.=.ru,11,u ru.1,1111,..u ur u.uw1 For its response to the arguments of the Joshua Intervenors at a telephone hearing on June 27, 2007, the Little Rock School Districts (LRSD) states: 1. Joshua argues that \"Little R.ock is appropriately stiU in [this case) because there's relief that still must be provided by Little Rock in order to facilitate the agreements of t'he other 'two districts, so that it would-still be appropriate for Little Rock to make financial contributions to this matter.\" (Tr. of June 27, 2007 telephone hearing, p. 6) Joshua also makes the following argument: Id. atp. 7. Llttle Rock whHe as the plaintiffs sought the relief, and part of the ,-.-Jjpf jo ;,.,,.~,H c-,.,.;M ~ncl'bfll\"l:I anA foJ..oftOI ;.- lA- tn. l\\A tt,.,tt,,. 1'1 ~,..., - --- ,..., ..,_..., __ ,._, - , .... __ ... .., ....... , -- ,w '\" -.v ,A - \"'- _, A,11, ._,.,,, 1\\6 .,.,,f .... __ ...... . \"\"A \"\"'\"'\" .......... -A.-h ,..A1,,,.AA,,,.. .,.,J...:.-J,.. _,, -\u0026amp; ..... ,.._ ,,,_ __ ;_ AAf .. .o. ... .,,,,.,., ~ ' \"\"''\"' ~..,.., .,,...,. .\u0026amp;MU!J\u0026amp;\u0026amp;\"' ..,~,,vu.a~ wuu.,,, cau VA.\"''\"''\"' Cl.A\"' .1.1a, a;;G Llt\"J.~ Rvek :.;till !i@ a w11ti.r,~lli,,\u0026amp; vtlige1tivJ, tv ii.~ tv ~t t~4.at what W.ili i'c'1u11cd l:,y tl1e p,iui.lc:, wiil, Jl:;:,pc~i iv. ihc uli,c, ui::il,j~t:s i:s iwpiCJlltmicu. Page 1 of 3 07/13/2007 14:13 5016045237 USDC PAGE 04 Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4131 FilP.r1 07 /11 /?007 Pag~ 2 of 3 2- These arguments do not justify or authorize the court to continue to require LRSD's par6cipation in the lunding of the Office of Desegregation Monitoring. The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals ''ordC1'ed the creation of the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM) to assist the district court in its supervision\" of the desegregation efforts of LRSD. PCSSD and NLRSD. LRSD v. PCSSD, 451 F.3d 528, 529 (8th Cir. 2006). This Court has released LRSD \"from all further supervision and monitoring from the Court, ODM and Joshua based upon its having subs~ntially complied with all of its obligations under the Revised Plan, the September 2002 Compliance Remedy, and the June 2004 Compliance Remedy.\" Order Declaring the little Rock School District Unitary, February 23, 2007, p. 49. This Order has not been stayed and r,ernains in effect pending appeal. 3. Since ODM was created ''to assist the district coun in its supel'Vision\" of LRSD, and the Court has held \"that LRSD is released from all further supervision and monitoring,\" then tbere is no practical reason for requiring LRSD to continue to participate in the funding of ODM. More importantly, however, LRSD has achieved unitary status and is no longer subject to the Court's jurisdiction to impose further remedies such as a requirement to continue to fund the '. ODM- Board of Edu.catwn v. Dowelt 498 U.S- 237, 247 (1991) (\"From the very first, federal supervision of local schooJ ~ystems was intended as a temporary measure to remedy past discrimination.\"); Freeman v. Pitts, 503 U.S. 467, 490 (1992) (\"Returning schools to the con_trol of local autttorities at the earliest practicable date is essential to restore their true accountability in our govemmental system.\") WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth above, Joshua's request that LRSD continue to participate in the funding of OJ\u0026gt;M should be denied. Page 2of3 07/13/2007 14:13 5016045237 usoc Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document4131 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 3 of 3 Respectfully submitted, ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark Christopher Heller (#81083) 400 We!it Capitol Little :Rocle, AR 72201-3493 (501) 376-2011 Isl Christopher Heller CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE PAGE 05 I certify that on July ll, 2007, I have electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of th .. r'r\"1..+ ,,ci,,n- ~hp. r\\1~r1: ~ 1'tA.., u1ftirl, f'.lht.:!:ll 11,.,...,~ nl\":-- ,_.,. ..:,}:;_ ...,._.,, ,.c, - ---- \"'JY .....A J\u0026amp;Af .... - 'tlllll-- ..,_,,_ ,,V-,1;.,,A;!..'.~.U-;-!'\u0026amp;\\'!'\\, Vn 4~ ~t\"\"-'t6, '....\".. ~f' .1.;.,.;,'1_\",',\u0026gt;e1:\",!' ,1.1~ . ~~~- F-,.,JJ-nu.._.r..;..n. e,. Scott. rjchardson@ai.state.ar. u~ sjones@mwsgw.com sjones@J1j.com johnwalkeratty@aol com and mailed by U.S. regular mail to the following addresses: Hon. Andree Roaf r)ff;.,..D .,,,./ Tl.o~.t!l,~ .t!!!J -,;.,,..,,,, ~l_,.n ;,_., ~, - ........ - ..,._ --Vi'lol't:,,'..,.0'--'..._v,, AAv .. \"\"\"\"\"\"\" 1 TT-: ..-. .... 1'.Y .. ...: - - - 1 n1 .... ,.. .. ~ VUAVU ~Cl.1.,1.VUCi41. A 4,04,0 ,..,,... TJ7 r,.ro_:_.,,,. , c, . ,: . .. iD,-,~ A.k-r YT., \"\"\"'1}'1\\Vl, JUAL'-' .J.U7.J T :~.,'t .. '\"- ' -\" 'T\"t. ,..,,,_,.../'1,4 J..,j.LL.lC ~\"'-\"-, ~ / ,1,,,,1,VJ.. Mr. Qayton Blackstock ivir. Mark Burnett iOiO W. Third 5treet Little Rock, AK 72201 JudgeJ. Thomas Ray U. S. District Courthouse 600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 149 Little Rock, AR 72201 Pase 3 of 3 Isl Christopher Heller 07/13/2007 14:13 5016045237 USDC Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4132 Filed 07/12/2007 Page, of 1 Mr. John W. Walker J,..1-,., UT ,111,..11,.~r n \" .,..., , . ,. ,. ~..,, A,a ol; JV UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTEAN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS RICH-\"RO SHEPPARD ARNOLD UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE 6w W. CAPITOL, r.iuOM 423 Facsimilei /e01) 004-51\u0026lt;69 July 12, 2.007 Re: LRSD v. PCSSD, ~t al, 4:82CV866WRW Dear Mr. Walker: PAGE 02 I have received and reviewed LRSD's response to your suggestion that it should continue helpinp; fund the ODM. It appears to me that LRSD is rip;ht. I am in the process of preparing an order covering the \"new direction\" of the ODM and plan to exclude LRSD from the program. If you have any ~pecific statutory or case law support for your position, please send it to me by noon, Thumi:iy; .Jn\\y J.9, ?007. Original to the Qerk of Court cc: The Honorable Joe Th.Qmas Ray Other Counsel of Record Cordially, Isl Wm. R. Wilson, Jr. 07/13/2007 14:13 5016045237 USDC Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4125 Filed 0o_/')7/'XJ07 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS RICHARD SHEPPARD ARNOLD UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE CUO VW , ...,._,-, 1 UL, HUUM 423 , , .,,,-rt r .n,.,,,._,,. ,. ,.,,.,11.,,..,.,,. _,,,,.,.,.,. ,,.,.,.,. ._. f --- .,..,._,,, -fllY\"ll'IV-,. ILLV T~.,) FacslmMe (5011 604-5149 June 27, .2007 Mr. Christopher J. Heller Friday, F,ldrecl~e \u0026amp; f'.l~rlr. T .T ;p - T Ittl_,. ~.t:\"t:-.k Region.c: rentAI' 400 WP.-d. r-.1-1,:n-i-tn--l -A---\"'-\".\"... \"-'-\" S.tlt~ 21]1)1) T ,tt! .. 1),-.,-\\,- \"1) ,.,..,,,1'11 -,,.n,, _ .......... _ \"\"\"'\"'-\"'' .. _, '--v ... ...,_.,,.J Re: LRSD v. PCSSD; et al, 4:82-CV-866 Dear Mr. Heller: PAGE 06 P~nA 1 nf 1 ~ . I held a telephone conference tx.,day with all the parties except the LRSD. The primary purpose was discussing Judge Roaf's appointment as the new Director of 0DM. She was present durinjt the telephone conference. Mr. Walker expressed the opinion that LRSD is still 14in the case\" for the purpose of defraying the expenses of the 0DM, including Judge Roaf's i:alllry r J:i:1n n.,:it ~v~ri ttiJs point much th,;mght, but had concluded th.at J . R.~n i41 ''01Jt'' ~i.nr~ It ~..J.1.~ ~~ 4'!d.a.re\u0026lt;l .mita.\"J. JJn!et e., c!-c-c.!TT:e, the Cc'(!rt nf An~~lc ,f,.,.lo,.,,.c tn thP ,.,., ... ~\"' . -- .. :,:,; - __ .. ,,,_., _ _ - . , . .. .,._ ..... - .. J I would like your response to 1his. You will probably want to order a transcript of the telephone ,c~nferen-c-e C~fer~ ~Z-r'f.d1r.i; :,v tha.t yvu ~, ~ ~~r. 11/G~kriic'~ ~-~\"t-fiL.- iX'irtLS. ,Please let me have your response by noon, Wednesday, July 11, 2007. Original to the Ocrk of the Court cc: Thr1 H.nnor:it:,)1'1 .Ji:,l'I Th,:1m~s R?.y 0th,-,- r,mng.oJ nf Jl.o,v,r,-1 Page 1 of 1 Cordially, /s/ Wm, R.WilsonJr. I 07/13/2007 14:13 5016045237 USDC WILLIAM R. WILSON, JR. united states District Judge bU0 West Capito~, Room 4~~ Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 501.604.5140 Fax - 501.604.5149 fax *: 19-371-0100 da'te: July 13, 2007 !'\u0026gt;nbj~ct:: I T.Rsn ___________________ ...... NOTES: I 5 including cover page I I think this is more than what vou I are lookina for, but better toolmuch than too little!! If this I isn' t what vou are lookina for. lolease call~me at 604-514i and I l~ill continue the search. I Mary I \\\" PAGE 01 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS RICHARD SHEPPARD ARNOLD UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE 600 W. CAPITOL, ROOM 423 LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-3325 Mr. John W. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 (501) 604-5140 Facsimile (501) 604-5149 July 12, 2007 Re: LRSD v. PCSSD, et al, 4:82CV866WRW Dear Mr. Walker: RECEIVED JUL 1 3 2007 OFACEOF DESEGREGATION MONITORING I have received and reviewed LRSD's response to your suggestion that it should continue helping fund the ODM. It appears to me that LRSD is right. I am in the process of preparing an order covering the \"new direction\" of the ODM, and plan to exclude LRSD from the program. If you have any specific statutory or case law support for your position, please send it to me by noon, Thursday, July 19, 2007. \\ Original to the Clerk of Court cc: The Honorable Joe Thomas Ray Other Counsel of Record Cordially, Isl Wm. R. Wilson, Jr. \\ Case : 4 : 82cv866 Office of Desegregation Monitor 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Little Rock , AR 72201 \\ MIME-Version : 1 . 0 From : ecf_ support@ared.uscourts . gov To:ared_ecf@localhost.localdomain essage-Id: \u0026lt;950536@ared . uscourts . gov\u0026gt; cc: ubject:Activity in Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Little Rock School , et al v . Pulaski Cty School, et al Order Content-Type : text / plain***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** You may view the filed documents once without charge . To avoid later charges , download a copy of each document during this first viewing.U . S. District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was e ntered on 7/12/2007 1:45 PM CDT and filed on 7/12/2007 Case Name : Little Rock School , et al v. Pulaski Cty School, et al Case Number : 4 : 82-cv- 866 http://ecf . ared . uscourts . gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?26052 Filer : WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 01 / 26/1998 Document Number : 4132 Copy the URL address from the line below into the l ocation bar of your Web browser to view the document : http : //ecf.ared.uscourts .gov/cgi-bin/show_case_ doc?4132 , 26052 ,,MAGIC ,,, 2005701 Docket Text: LETTER/ORDER Joshua intervenors are to file any specific statutory or case law in support of their position re. ODM funding by noon July 19, 2007 Signed by Judge William R. Wilson Jr . on 7/12/07 . (dac) 4 : 82-cv-866 Notice has been electronically mailed to : Clayton R. Blackstock cblackstock@mbbwi . com \u0026amp;:hilip E . Kaplan pkaplan@kbmlaw.net, nmoler@kbmlaw.net ~ hristopher J . Heller heller@fec.net , brendak@fec . net, tmiller@fec.net M. Samuel J bnes, III sjones@mwsgw . com, aoverton@mwsgw.com Stephen W. Jones sjones@jlj . com, linda.calloway@jlj . com John W. Walker johnwalkeratty@aol.com, jspringer@gabrielmail.com, lorap72297@aol.com Mark Terry Burnette mburnette@mbbwi.com John Claybb rn Fendley , Jr clayfendley@comcast.net , yeldnef@yahoo.com Scott Paris Richardson scott.richardson@arkansasag.gov, agcivil@arkansasag . gov, patsy . dooley@arkansasag.gov 4 : 82- cv-866 Notice has been delivered by other means to: Norman J. Chachkin NAACP Legal Defense \u0026amp; Educational Fund, Inc. - New York 99 Hudson Street Suite 1600 New York, NY 10013 Timothy Gerard Gauger Arkansas Attorney General ' s Office Catlett-Prien Tower Building 323 Center Street Suite 200 Li ttle Rock, AR 72201-2610 James M. Llewel l yn, Jr Thompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn , P.A . A Post Office Box 818 W,rort Smith , AR 72 90 2- 0818 Office o f Desegregation Monitor One Union Nat iona l Plaza 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 William P. Thompson Thompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn, P.A. ost Office Box 818 ort Smith , AR 72902-0818 The following document(s) are associated with this transaction : Document description: Main Document Original filename : n/a Electronic document Stamp : [STAMP dcecfStamp_ ID=l095794525 [Date=7/12 /2007 ] [FileNumber=950535-0 ] [6eeb968ba3a74ea39c6ded7f0a1968bddaaf99clldb3e7159930b41aebbda760ac6dd4299be529c f01534577b554f6792c2992da40e8b8753fb9437be068dac4] J llfJ L ,~ DURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT coURyAS'TERN d~cT~BAS EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JUL 1 g 2007 WESTERN DIVISION LITILEROCKSCHOOLDISTRICT v. 4:82CV00866 WRW/JTR PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. ORDER JAMES W. McCORMACK, CLERK By: ~CLERK DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS On July 17, 2007, I received the Office of Desegregation Monitoring's proposed budget for the 2006-2007 fiscal year. I have attached a copy of the budget to this Order, and if there are - any objections, parties must respond within five (5) days; otherwise, the ODM's proposed budget will be accepted as presented and become effective immediately. IT IS SO ORDERED this _if.!_ day of July, 2007. RECEIVED JUL f O 2007 OFACEOF DESEGREGATION Jt10NITORING ~------ STATESDrsTRICT JUDGE Office of Desegregation Monitoring l.ln!t9d stal8s Ola1rlct Cell.It Eastam District of Arlcarllas RECEIVED July 17, 2007 JUL 2 3 2007 OFFICE OF The Honorable William R. Wilson DESEGREGATION MON/TOR/NG Judge, United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas 600 West Capitol. Room 423 Little Rock, AR 72201-3325 Dear Judge Wtlson: One Union National Plaza 124 West Cspltol, Suite 1895 llttle Rock, Arlc:ansas 72201 (601} 37'6-620\u0026gt; Fax (fi01) 371-0100 Attached for your approval is the proposed ODM budget for 2006-07, the fiscal year just concluded. The format of the budget document follows that ofODM's previous budgets, including annotations to explain revenue calculations, definitions of budget categories, and the budgeted allocations for the year by category. The LRSD has requested that we provide the amount of accumulated vacation days for the ODM staff so that they may discharge their accrued shared of this :financial obligation. However, we have not included this sum in the 2006-07 budget pending resolution of the iss~ of the future operation of ODM and ofLRSD's participation in the 2007-08 budget In addition, we have a small amount of money ($2,603.25) from the sale of smplus furniture that will be carried over to the 2007-08 fiscal year. I will promptly provide any additional information upon request. Sincerely yours, ~ft,,)/ Director, Office of o\"::::l.on Monitoring Enc. OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING 2006-07 BUDGET REVENUE 2005-08 2005,08 200M7 Budget ~ Proposed Budaat State of Arkansas 200,000.00 200,000.00 200,000.00 LRSD Budget allocation 119,348.00 119,348.00 112,358.00 Minus aedll from pnwlous year (1,283.00) (1,283.00} 4,324.00 Equals LRSD'a share of the budget 120,831.00 120,831.00 108,032.00 NL.RSC Budget allocatlon 43,327.00 43,327.00 41,786.00 Mlnua aedll from prrricus year (-488.00) (-488.00) 1,608.00 Equals NLRSO's shara of the budge! 43,793.00 43,793.00 40,178.00 PCSSD Budget allocaClon 84,084.00 84,084.00 77,999.00 Minus credit from previous year (904.00) (904.oo) 3,002.00 Equals PCSSD'a share of the budget 84,968.00 84,988.00 74,997.00 Interest 2,398.58 Tolal Revenue 446,739.00 '148, 138.56 432,141.00 Nole: 1118 un of1he cndlB In lhe above chm1 II the unspent amount of our previous year's budget, lndudlng bank lnlnat eemed. EW!ll'J budget C'/dl, 00M aJllies lhls amount IDwmd each IChool dlllrtcl'8 bu\"'8IBd allocallon. Bolh 1hat allocallon and the c:nldlt .. delelmlned ~ the proposed budget by lhe pnMOUS ,_., OclDber 1 erlRll!nent numbn, than adjuslBd accordlngly wlWI Iha erllDllment numbn fir' the CUITlnt yw become avallabla. EXPENDmJRES 200\u0026amp;-08 2005-GI 2D04MJ7 Budget ExpenclltUla Proposed Budfd Communk:atlorm 8,000.00 8,380.12 4,805.00 Dues and Fees 276.00 0.00 0.00 Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 FoodSenllca D.00 0.00 0.00 Management Servtcea 0.00 0.00 0.00 Per1odlcals 0.00 135.00 108.00 Priming \u0026amp; Binding 6,250.00 4,114.54 4,331.00 Prof \u0026amp; Tech Servicea 1,700.00 722.50 783.00 Rent 62,584.00 51,246.16 41,\"54.00 Repelra\u0026amp;Malnteralce -400.00 0.00 162.00 Resource Library 0.00 0.00 0.00 Salariee 300,803.00 300,803.00 302,181.00 Beneflla 74,322.00 73,681.16 76,020.00 Staff D881opi1ient 0.00 0.00 0.00 SUpplJe8 3,500.00 1,785.38 1,711.00 Travel 1,525.00 90.32 0.00 Insurance 800.00 601.00 606.00 Tatal Expendlluraa 448,739.00 439,338.17 432,141.00 Dlffllrwlc:e (Income minus EJq,erxllturw 0.00 8,933.87 0.00 ANNOTATED ODM BUDGET FOR 2006-07 REVENUE The Court's Interim Order of June 27, 1989 required that: ... [T]be amount previously ordered fur the Pulaski County :Educational Cooperative (Co-op) [$200,000.00] shall be applied towatd the budget of the office of the MetropolitanSupen,isor .... Thebalaor.eofthebudgetwillbeapportionedamongtbe school districts on a per pupil basis .... Eighth Circuit Order of December 12, 1990: ... [T]be officeprmously known as the Office of the Metropolitan Supervisor will be reconstituted as the Office ofDategregation Monitoring. ... 20lll-07 lludgat 1ar1 %al 200l-47 2DOIMl8 200I-01 EnralJ- TCICld Budget Crwdlt 8udglt ment Enroll- Allaclllaa (Budglt Pa.,rmnt ment not~ LRSO 28,470 41.40 112,388 4,124 108.032 NLR8D 9,842 18.00 41,7115 1,808 40,178 PCSSD 18,374 33.80 TT,\u0026amp; 3,00'l 74,997 SIIIBafM 200,000 200,000 .. Tdal 64,886 100.00 ~141 8,1134 423;Jm Desmibed below is the step-by-step process, reflected in the chart above, that we use to cfetemri~ eacli district's contribution to the ODM budget: 1. The State of Arbosas' contn\"bution ($200,000.00) is subtracted from ODM's total budget. 2. Based on this year's October 1 enrollment, the districts are charged their pro rata share of ODM's budget (minus the state's contnl\u0026gt;Ution). 3. Each district is cn:dited with its pro nta share of ODM's unspent budget for the previous year. 4. The S1Dil is the amount each district is to contribatc to ODM's budget. The districts will be notified before the close of the current fiscal year of the exact m:nount due fur its share of ODM'sbudgct. - EXPENDITURES N.: Definitions of expense categories are based on the .Arkansas School Finalfclal Accounting Manual. Communieadom: Services provided by persons or businesses to assist in transmitting and receiving messages \u0026lt;\u0026gt;r information. This category includes telephone services aa well as postage machine rental and postage. 1-=1 ~ .. 1-~1 The decrw In 1he 2006-07 budget 1B due ID a negolalBd ,die wllh a 118W aervlca pruvldar flld a reduced number of phone Ines Wti1 !he ollk:a. Dues and Fees: Expenditures or aiae,,smeot fi\u0026gt;r m.eDJbcrship .in professional or other organi:zatfons or mmociations or payments to a paying agent for services provided. such aa conference registration fees. Equipment: Expenditures fbr the initial, additional, and repl8'YMlent items or equipment. such as ~ and machinery, 0.00 Manageu.ent Serriccl: Services pex~ by persons qualified to assist management either in the broad policy atca or in gem:ral operations. This category includes consultants, indmdually or as a team, to assist the chief executive in confelence ur through systematic studies. --:1 ~J-.:::1 Pagc3 - Periodkals: Expenditures for periodicals and newspapers for general use. A periodical is any publication appearing at R:gular iDtcrvals ofless than a ye,ar and continuing for an indefinite period. 1-~00l ~~1-..::1 Printing and Binding: Expenditures for job printing and binding, usually according to specifications. This includes the design aod printing of forms as well as printing and binding publications. 2005-08 Budget 200MB 2006-07 PropoNd ExpencllturN Budget 5,460.00 4,114.54 4,331.00 Professional and Teelmlcal Sea vie\u0026amp;; Services which by their nature can be per.fanned only by persons with specialized skills and knowledge. 1-=1 ~1-..:::1 Rent: Expenditures for leasing or renting land and buildings for both temporary end long-range use. 200l-08Budgat 200s-GI 2008-o7 Propoaed l!xpendllurN Budget 52,564.00 51,245.18 41,-464.00 The decnsa8e In 1he 200\u0026amp;-07 budget 18 due to a radudlon In office apace. Repaln and Maintenance: Expenditures for repairs and roairrtenaoce !la'Vices which restore equipment t.o its original state or are a part of a routine preventive maintenance program. This includes service contracts and contmctua1 agreements covering the mainter,an~ end operation of equipment and equipment systc.ms. 1-::1 --=:001-~1 Page4 - Salaries: Salarus are the amounts paid to employees who are considered to be in positions of a pennaneot or temporary nature. 200\u0026amp;-48Budget 2005-08 2008-G'TPropoeed Expendltulva Budget . 300,803.00 300,803.00 302,181.00 Below is a breakdown of each employee's budgeted 2006-07 salary, reflecting a 3.29% annual base increase, which is equal to or less than the annual step increase on the salary scales of the local districts. flllmeof -- 20GI-07 Em..,_ 8alaJy Salary Andl98Roaf' 1,373 GenaJonas' 63,438 48,480 Margie Powell 74,880 77,354 HonamSmllh* 74,890 84,694 Polly Ramer 66,212 68,081 UndaBlyarlt 31,173 32,189 Total 300,803 302,181 1Judge Andrea Roaf began a !he Oll9dDr d ODM on June '/1, 'l!X1/. 'Gaut Jona raduc:ad his wm time fnJm 415 ht 2005-08 ID 315 llme for ~7. In addllloo, Gene elacfl 1D recelw payment for fGUIU8I lneunmcapnlffllana In Beu af1he lnlUl'ance benetllsand lllsaalary ra1lacll lhatdedalon. Gene l8Slgned 3-15-07. His sallly Includes 45 dayl of aa:umulallld vatlarl. 31-knce Smllt realgnad ~-Hie aalary lndudaa 33.5 day\u0026amp; of 8DCUIIIJlalBd vacabl. Bencfia: Benefi1Bare1he amounts paid on behalf of mnployees and not included in the gross salary, but are over and abo~ Such payments an, fringe benefit payments. 20CHl,08 Budgat 2GO\u0026amp;,,OI 2Qae.o7Propoeed E!xpendlturN Budget 74,322.00 73,881.16 78,020.00 Beow a breakdown .ofeachemnw,cc's2006-07 . 1 is bv \" : . . frirui benefits Name car 8oclll RilClnt- Hoapllal,- Litt Dental Hoapltal Short Total Allowance Sec:urftr ,_ -lzdan lnL fndela1111J Tenn ..... Roaf 105.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 105.03 Jena 720,00 3,783.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,'4\u0026amp;5.92 POMJII 1200.00 5,1173.13 10,997.80 3,137.98 32.84 275.79 60.98 82.88 21,740.93 8mllh 1200.00 8,326.44 12,025.17 3,143.84 32.84 275.78 80.118 62.88 23,128.49 Rimer 4,364.21 8,128.48 3,162.72 32.84 275.78 60.88 62.81 18,077.93 Biyant 2,G\u0026gt;.17 4,507.80 3,137.98 20.40 275.78 80.98 82.88 10,485.83 Tdal 3,120.00 22,941.80 35,651.03 12,582.28 118.32 1,103.04 243.84 251 .62 78,019.93 Pages Supplies: Expcnditurcs for all supplies for the operation, including freight and cartage. Amounts paid fur material items of an expc:ndablenature that are consumed, worn 01!4 or detcrlo.rated in use or items that lose their identity through filbrication or incorporation into different or more complex uoits or substunces. 200a-o8 Budget 20ff.fl 2006-07PropoNCI ExpendlturN Budget 3,600.00 1,785.38 1,711.00 Travel: Expenditures for transportation, meals, hotel, and other expenses associated with naveling or business, such as puking fees. Payments fur per diem in lieu of reimbursements for subsistence (room and board) also are charged here. 90.32 IDJurancc: Expenditures fur all types of insurance coverage such as property, liability, fidelity, as well as the costs of judgments. 2GOI-08 Budgllt I ..... I 2008-07 Proposed I e.pendHurw ~ . 800.00 801.00 608.~ Page6 Case : 4:82cv866 Office of Desegregation Monitor 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Li ttle Rock , AR 72201 MIME-Version:1.0 From:ecf_support@ared.uscourts .gov To:ared_ecf@localhost . localdomain 6:~~age-Id : \u0026lt;955298@ared.uscourts . gov\u0026gt; W;bject:Activity in Case 4:82-cv- 00866-WRW Little Rock School, et al v . Pulaski Cty School, et al Order Content-Type: text/plain***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** You may view the filed documents once without charge. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing.U.S. District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered on 7/19/2007 1:41 PM CDT and filed on 7/19/2007 Case Name: Little Rock School , et al v. Pulaski Cty School, et al Case Number: 4:82-cv-866 http://ecf.ared.uscourts . gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?26052 Filer: WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 01/26/1998 Document Number: 4134 Copy the URL address from the line below into the location bar of your Web browser to view the document: http://ecf . ared.uscourts . gov/cgi-bin/show_case_doc?4134,26052, , MAGIC, ,, 200S707 Docket Text: ORDER parties have five days to file any objections to the Office of Desegregation Monitoring ' s proposed budget for the 2006-2007 fiscal year. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson Jr. on 7/19/07. (Attachment: # (1) ODM ' s Proposed Budget) (dac) 82-cv-866 Notice has been electronically mailed to: ayton R. Blackstock cblackstock@mbbwi.com hilip E. Kaplan pkaplan@kbmlaw. net, nmoler@kbmlaw.net Christopher J . Heller heller@fec.net, brendak@fec . net, tmiller@fec.net M. Samuel Jones, III sjones@mwsgw.com, aoverton@mwsgw.com Stephen W. Jones sjones@jlj.com, linda.calloway@jlj.com John W. Walker johnwalkeratty@aol.com, jspringer@gabrielmail.com, lorap72297@aol.com Mark Terry Burnette mburnette@mbbwi.com John Clayburn Fendley, Jr clayfendley@comcast . net, yeldnef@yahoo.com Scott Paris Richardson scott.richardson@arkansasag.gov, agcivil@arkansasag.gov, patsy.dooley@arkansasag.gov 4:82-cv-866 Notice has been delivered by other means to: Norman J. Chachkin NAACP Legal Defense \u0026amp; Educational Fund, Inc . - New York 99 Hudson Street Suite 1600 New York, NY 10013 Timothy Gerard Gauger Arkansas Attorney General's Office Catlett-Prien Tower Building 323 Center Street Suite 200 Little Rock, AR 72201-2610 A ames M. Llewellyn, Jr Wl,ompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn, P.A. Post Office Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 Office of Desegregation Monitor One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Little Rock , AR 72201 A 11iam P . Thompson ~ ompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn, P.A. Post Office Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 The following document(s) are associated with this transaction: Document description: Main Document Original filename: n/a Electronic document Stamp : [STAMP dcecfStamp_ ID=l095794525 [Date=7/19/2007] [FileNurnber=955297-0) [6c47df384b878d59fd66b8156lcflc07443ffbcac49763a0c6f65d4f08918b352ee5f46825al6f0 7e330e6ceeldd6f6528d0a3be42b7224da38ebel00b94eca4)) Document description : ODM ' s Proposed Budget Original filename : n/a Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP dcecfStamp_ ID=l095794525 [Date=7/19/2007) [FileNurnber=955297-1) [70fa24bb774a735fll633220c3a4c5lfcb2dac89a5d943a47929d3b362649218ca83633c04a44f8 2fb9lc8lb7c64c65b015f9c8220cfa9bc5376dbc5293a0daa)) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT Case No. 07-1866 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellee V. NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. DALE CHARLES, ET AL., RECEIVED JUL 31 2001 Off\\CEOf DESEGREGAl\\Otl MOtl\\lORlMG V. PULASKI COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, ET AL. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL., Intervenors \\ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT'S RESPONSE TO APPEALLANTS' MOTION TO STAY For its response, the Little Rock School District (LRSD) states: LRSD agrees that this appeal should be stayed during the time the parties are engaged in the mediation process. Respectfully submitted, Christopher Heller (Ark. Bar #81083) Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol A venue, Suite 2000 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 376-2011 Atto~ Christopher Heller '------ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on July 27, 2007, I have electronically filed the foregoing with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit using the CM/ECF system, which shall send notification of such filing to the following: Scott.richardson@ag.state.ar.us sjones@mwsgw.com sjones@jlj.com johnwalkeratty@aol.com and mailed by U.S. regular mail to the following addresses: Hon. Andree Roaf Office of Desegregation Monitor 1 Union National Plaza 124 W. Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Clayton Blackstock Mr. Mark Burnett 1010 W. Third Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Judge J. Thomas Ray U.S. District Courthouse 600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 149 Little Rock, AR 72201 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT Case No. 07-1866 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellee V. NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. RECEIVED DALE CHARLES, ET AL., JUL 31 2007 OFFICE OF v. DESEGREGATION MONITORING. PULASKI COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, ET AL. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL., Intervenors/ Appellants \\ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT'S RESPONSE TO SECOND AMENDED MOTION TO INTERVENE For its Response to the Second Amended Motion to Intervene, the Little Rock School District (LRSD) states: 1. A group of taxpayers, parents and patrons of the LRSD (\"proposed intervenors\") claim to represent the legitimate interests of LRSD and seek to intervene in this appeal. See Second Amended Motion to Intervene, paragraphs 21 - and 24. The proposed intervenors assert that the LRSD Board of Directors \"is unable to represent the interests of the District because the majority of the Board - members are under the influence of [Appellants' counsel].\" Id. at paragraph 25. They ask the Court to dismiss this appeal or, alternatively, to enjoin LRSD from seeking to resolve this appeal through the Court's prehearing conference program. Id. at paragraphs 31 and 32; see Rules for the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 32A; Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 33. 2. The director of the Court's prehearing conference program has scheduled a prehearing conference for August 9 and 10, 2007 at Little Rock. Appellants have presented LRSD a \"settlement proposal\" which will likely represent their opening position at the prehearing conference. The proposed intervenors believe that the Appellants' settlement proposal should be rejected. See Second Amended Motion to Intervene, paragraph 9 (\"[T]he proposed settlement will create a nightmare for the District\"); paragraph 8 (\"The settlement prop'osed by Mr. Walker would provide Mr. Walker unwarranted contractual leverage over the District);\" paragraph 14 (LRSD's attorney advised the LRSD Board that the \"settlement proposal would unduly bind the District\" and \"likely would violate the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution .... \"). LRSD has not agreed to Appellants' proposal, however, or decided to do anything more than participate in the Court's prehearing_ conference program. 3. The Intervenors do not provide the Court a sufficient basis to justify the extraordinary use of federal power to prevent opposing parties in litigation from even talking about their differences in an effort to resolve them. The federal 2 - courts have always respected the democratic process and the legitimate auth0rity of local officials. Even in cases involving constitutional violations ( and no illegal acts of any kind are alleged here), federal courts have recognized the importance of returning control to locally elected school officials at the earliest possible time. Freeman v. Pitts, 503 U.S. 467, 490 (1992) (\"Returning schools to the control of local authorities at the earliest practicable date is essential to restore their true accountability in our governmental system.\") 4. The proposed intervenors want to intervene to ask the Court to dismiss this appeal \"for failure to prosecute or, in the alternative, on mootness grounds.\" Second Amended Motion to Intervene, paragraph 31. Appellants have been ~anted two extensions of time but those have been within the authority of the clerk to grant. Rules for the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, 37B{a). In a separate response filed today, L~D agrees with Appellants that this appeal should be held in abeyance pending the outcome of the prehearing conference. There has therefore been no sanctionable failure to prosecute this appeal. 5. The question of the viability of the Joshua Intervenors as a class will be addressed by the Appellants. LRSD simply sees no legal impediment to its participation in the Court's prehearing conference program and then, if necessary, - seeking to have the District Court's Order affirmed on the merits of this appeal. 3 6. The proposed intervenors contend that the \"[t]he interests of the District and the community represented by the proposed intervenors cannot be ' served by regular school board elections.\" They argue that \"[t]he ballot box is an inadequate remedy in this case.\" Second Motion to Intervene, paragraph 24. The LRSD Board members are the elected representatives of the people. They are free to exercise all of the authority granted them under Arkansas law. The proposed intervenors do not accuse the Board of having acted illegally or beyond the scope of its authority, but only in a manner which the proposed intervenors consider to be \"contrary to interests of the District.\" There is no reason for this Court to determine who represents the interests of LRSD. The voters have already done ' that. If the proposed intervenors disagree with the legal actions of the LRSD Board of Directors, the ballot box provides not only an adequate remedy, but the only 'remedy. 7. In the absence of an alleged constitutional violation, the exercise of federal jurisdiction to limit or control a school board's legitimate exercise of its statutory authority also offends the right of the State of Arkansas to exercise governmental power through the creation of political subdivisions such as school districts. Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh, 207 US 161 (1907); See also, Sailors v. Board of Education, 387 US 105 (1967). 8. The proposed intervenors \"are not entitled to intervene based merely on the belief that their representatives on the School Board are not aggressively 4 defending the instant lawsuit.\" Graham v. Evangeline Parish School Board, 223 F.R.D. 407, 435 (W.D. La. 2004); citing United States v. Franklin Parish School Board, 47 F3d 755, 757 (5th Cir 1995). The proposed intervenors have not overcome the \"presumption that government institutions represent the interests of the public at large.\" Graham v. Evangeline Parish School Board, 223 F.R.D. 407 at 435; citing United States v. Louisiana, 90 F.R.D. 358, 363-364 (E. D. La. 1981). The Second Amended Motion to Intervene should be denied. WHEREFORE, LRSD respectfully requests that the Court deny the Second Amended Motion to Intervene and grant it all other proper relief. Respectfully submitted, Christopher Heller (Ark. Bar #81083) Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol A venue, Suite 2000 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 376-2011 Attorneys for Appelle~ ChriSt- ~~ 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on July 27, 2007, I have electronically filed the foregoing with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit using the CM/ECF system, which shall send notification of such fihng to the following: Scott.richardson@ag.state.ar.us sjones@mwsgw.com sjones@jlj.com johnwalkeratty@aol.com Jess L.Askew[jaskew@williamsanderson.com] and mailed by U.S. regular mail to the following addresses: Hon. Andree Roaf Office of Desegregation Monitor 1 Union National Plaza 124 W. Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Clayton Blackstock Mr. Mark Burnett 1010 W. Third Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Judge J. Thomas Ray U.S. District Courthouse 600 West Capitol A venue, Suite 149 Little Rock, AR 72201 6 - ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF Dr. T. Kenneth James, Commissioner . Educatilfn 4 State Capitol Mall Little Rock, AR 72201-1071 (501) 682-4475 http://ArkansasEd.org July 31, 2007 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 LittleRock,AR 72201 RECEIVED Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. M. Samuel Jones III AUG -1 2007 OFFICE OF - DESEGREGATION MONITORING Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. U.S. District Court No. 4:82-CV-866 WRW Dear Gentlemen: fer an agreement with the Attorney General's Office, I am filing the Arkansas Department of Education's Project Management Tool for the month of July 2007 in the above-referenced case. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. 1~ General Counsel Arkansas Department of Education SS:law cc: Scott \u0026amp;sb\u0026amp;40P, M2wsx Qeperaj's Ptfiss STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION: Chair: Diane Tatum, Pine Bluff Vice Chair: Randy Lawson, Bentonville Members: Sherry Burrow, Jonesboro ., Jim Cooper, Melbourne Dr. Calvin King, Marianna ., Dr. Tim Knight, Arkadelphia Dr; Ben Mays, Clinton MaryJane Rebick, Little Rock Dr. Naccaman Williams, Springdale An Equal Opportunity Employer UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DNISION RECEIVED AUG -1 2007 OFRCEOF DESEGREGATION MONITORING LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. No. LR-C-82-866 WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of the ADE's Project Management Tool for July 2007. Respectfully Submitted, ~~ General Counsel Arkansas Department of Education #4 Capitol Mall, Room 404-A Little Rock, AR 72201 501-682-4227 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Scott Smith, certify that on July 31, 2007, I caused the foregoing document to be served by depositing a copy in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to each of the following: \\ Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr.M. SamuelJones,III Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard 425 West Capitol, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 72201 J?:. ti Jq-c_, Scott Smith IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION RECEIVED LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL V. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL NO. LR-C-82-866 WRW .r AUG -1 2007 (fRCEOF PLAINTIFFS DESEGREGATIOU MOr.rmruNG DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions - of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. - IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year: 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DMSION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. 4:82CV00866 WRWIJTR PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. RECEIVED AUG -1 2007 OFRCEOF DESEGREGATION MONITORING ORDER PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS As discussed, without objection, in the June 27, 2007 telephone conference, the Honorable Andree Roaf is appointed as Director of the Office of Desegregation Monitoring. Her - annual salary will be $119,000, which will be paid by the parties through the annual ODM budget. Additionally, with no objections having been filed, the ODM's Proposed 2006-2007 ' Budget1 is accepted and effective immediately. Since the Little Rock School District has been declared unitary, it has no obligation with respect to this budget. IT IS SO ORDERED this 31st day of July, 2007. Isl Wm. R. Wilson, Jr. UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1Doc. No. 41 34, Ex. 1. Case: 4 : 82cv866 Office of Desegregation Monitor 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 MIME-Version:1.0 From : ecf_support@ared.uscourts . gov To : ared_ecf@localhost.localdomain . essage-Id:\u0026lt;963593@ared.uscourts.gov\u0026gt; w ee: Subject:Activity in Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Little Rock School, et al v. Pulaski Cty School, et al Order Content-Type : text/plain***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** You may view the filed documents once without charge. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing . U.S. District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered on 7/31/2007 3:54 PM CDT and filed on 7/31/2007 Case Name: Little Rock School, et al v . Pulaski Cty School, et al Case Number: 4:82-cv-866 http://ecf.ared . uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?26052 Filer: WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 01/26/1998 Document Number: 4135 Copy the URL address from the line below into the location bar of your Web browser to view the document: http://ecf.ared .uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_case_doc?4135,26052,,MAGIC,,,2005709 Docket Text: ORDER, the Honorable Andree Roaf is Appointed as Director of the Office of Desegregation Monitoring . The ODM'S Proposed 2006-2007 Budget is accepted and effective immediately. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson Jr . on 7/31/07 . (dac) 4:82 - cv-866 Notice has been electronically mailed to: a 1ayton R. Blackstock cblackstock@rnbbwi.com 9 hilip E. Kaplan pkaplan@kbmlaw.net , nmoler@kbmlaw.net Christopher J . Heller heller@fec.net, brendak@fec.net, tmiller@fec.net M. Samuel Jones, III sjones@mwsgw . com, aoverton@mwsgw.com Stephen W. Jones sjones@jlj.com, linda.calloway@jlj.com John W. Walker johnwalkeratty@aol . com, jspringer@gabrielmail.com, lorap72297@aol.com Mark Terry Burnette mburnette@rnbbwi.com John Clayburn Fendley, Jr clayfendley@comcast . net, yeldnef@yahoo . ~om Scott Paris Richardson scott . richardson@arkansasag.gov, agcivil@arkansasag . gov, patsy.dooley@arkansasag.gov 4:82-cv-866 Notice has been delivered by other means to: Norman J. Chachkin NAACP Legal Defense \u0026amp; Educational Fund, Inc . - New York 99 Hudson Street Suite 1600 New York, NY 10013 Timothy Gerard Gauger Arkansas Attorney General's Office .Catlett-Prien Tower Building 323 Center Street Suite 200 Little Rock, AR 72201-2610 ames M. Llewellyn , Jr hompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn , P.A. ost Office Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 Office of Desegregation Monitor One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Little Rock , AR 72201 'lliam P . Thompson ompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn , P .A. ost Office Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902- 0818 The following document(s) are associated with this transaction : Document description : Main Document Original filename: n/a Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP dcecfStamp_ ID=l095794525 [Date=7/31/2007] [FileNumber=963592-0] [3c22accd0728a391213cb920e00ab7b73lae8a76e918889d7234b31538af24e74d7955929890362 c0399ab5lfd9facf067fl3f95eaa90381233bl2a05c958c5b]J IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DMSION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. 4:82CV00866 WRWIJTR PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. AMENDED ORDER RECEIVED AUG - 2 2007 (ffCEQF rnDllM! IISHRBlllOII IOIITunma PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS As discussed, without objection, in the June 27, 2007 telephone conference, the Honorable Andree Roaf is appointed as Director of the Office of Desegregation Monitoring. Her - annual salary will be $119,000, which will be paid by the parties through the annual ODM budget. Additionally, with no objections having been filed, the ODM's Proposed 2006-2007 \\ Budget1 is accepted and effective immediately. Since the Little Rock School District has been declared unitary, it has no obligation with respect to future budgets. IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of August, 2007. Isl Wm. R. Wilson, Jr. UNITED ST ATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1Doc. No. 4134, Ex. 1. Case: 4:82cv866 Office of Desegregation Monitor 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Little Rock , AR 72201 MIME-Version:1.0 From:ecf_support@ared.uscourts . gov To:ared_ecf@localhost . localdomain - ~~age-Id: \u0026lt;964503@ared.uscourts.gov\u0026gt; Subject:Activity in Case 4 : 82 - cv-00866-WRW Little Rock School, et al v . Pulaski Cty School, et al Order Content-Type: text / plain***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** You may view the filed documents once without charge . To avoid later charges , download a copy of each document during this f i rst viewing.U . S . District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered on 8 / 1 / 2007 3:33 PM CDT and filed on 8/1/2007 Case Name: Little Rock School, et al v. Pulaski Cty School , et al Case Number: 4 : 82-cv-866 http : //ecf . ared.uscourts.gov/ cgi-bin/ DktRpt . pl?26052 Filer: WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 01 / 26 / 1998 Document Number : 4138 Copy the URL address from the line below into the location bar of your Web browser to view the document : http://ecf . ared.uscourts.gov/ cgi-bin/ show_case_ doc?4138 , 26052 , ,MAGIC,, , 20057l9 Docket Text : AMENDED ORDER since the LRSD has been declared unitary, it has no obligation with respect to future budgets re [4135) Order Signed by Judge William R. Wilson Jr. on 8/1/07. (dac) 4 : 82-cv-866 Notice has been electronically mailed to : Clayton R. Blackstock cblackstock@mbbwi . com a hilip E. Kaplan pkaplan@kbmlaw . net , nmoler@kbmlaw . net - hristopher J . Heller heller@fec . net, brendak@fec . net , tmiller@fec.net M. Samuel Jones , III sjones@mwsgw . com, aoverton@mwsgw . com Stephen W. Jones sjones@jlj.com, linda.calloway@jlj.com John W. Walker johnwalkeratty@aol.com, jspringer@gabrielmail . com, lorap72297@aol.com Mark TerrY'.Burnette mburnette@mbbwi.com John ,Clayburn Fend l ey, Jr clayfendley@comcast . net, yeldnef@yahoo . com Scott Paris Richardson scott . richardson@arkansasag . gov, agcivil@arkansasag . gov, patsy . dooley@arkansasag.gov 4 : 82-cv-866 Notice has been delivered by other means to : Norman J . Chachkin NAACP Legal Defense \u0026amp; Educational Fund, Inc . - New York 99 Hudson Street Suite 1600 New York , NY 10013 Timothy Gerard Gauger Arkansas Attorney General ' s Office Catlett-Prien Tower Building .323 Center Street Suite 200 Little Rock , AR 72201-2610 James M. Llewellyn , Jr A Thompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn, P.A. W ?ost Office Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 Office of Desegregation Monitor One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol Suite 18 95 Little Rock, AR 72201 William P. Thompson ompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn , P.A. st Office Box 818 rt Smith, AR 72902-0818 The following document (s) are as s ociated with this trans action : Document description : Main Document Original filename : n / a Electronic document Stamp : [STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=l095794525 [Date=8/l / 2007] [FileNumber=964502-0) [559cf8fcaldbd9b7a 9dc60la8clffd8f9596dfc3b78205332flf93ea5544b2418b9f6189ce49all 87122c48809a7b52ba74dff4edfe772albbf7e20cb05ad9le)] \\ Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4140 Filed 08/30/2007 Page1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION ir--- FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN OISTRICT ARKANSAS AUG 3 O 2007 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. No. LR-C-82-866 WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Cowt's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Dep;ll'tment of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of the ADE's Project Management Tool for August 2007. \\ 1~1- General Counsel Arkansas Department of Education #4 Capitol Mall, Room 404-A Little Rock, AR 72201 501-682-4227 RECEIVED AUG 3 O 2007 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING ''\"\";\"1'\"' ,;' ., Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Document 4140 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 2 of 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Scott Smith, certify that on August 30, 2007, I caused the foregoing document to be served by depositing a copy in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to each of the following: Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Marlc Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes. Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-151 0 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr.M.SamuelJones,ill Mitchell, Williams,. Selig,. Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard 425 West Capitol, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 72201. J~~ C Smith I Page 1 of2 polly From: ecf_support@ared.uscourts.gov Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 3:59 PM To: ared_ecf@ared.uscourts.gov Subject: Activity in Case 4:82-cv-00866-WRW Little Rock School, et al v. Pulaski Cty School, et al Notice (Other) This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** You may view the filed documents once without charge. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. U.S. District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered on 8/30/2007 at 4:59 PM CDT and filed on 8/30/2007 Case Name: Little Rock School, et al v. Pulaski.Cty School, et al . Case Number: 4:82-cv-866 Filer: Arkansas Department.of Education WARNING~ CASE CLOSED on 01/26/1998 Document Number:-4140 Docket Text: NOTICE Of Filing AD E's Project Management. Tool for August 2007 by Arkansas-Department of Education (available in paper format only). (mkf) 4:82-cv-866 Notice has been electronically mailed to:_ Clayton R. Blackstock cblackstock@mbbwi.com Philip E. Kaplan pkaplan@williamsanderson.com, nmoler@williamsanderson.com Christopher J. Heller heller@fec.net, brendak@fec .net, tmiller@fec .net M. Samuel Jones, III sjones@mwsgw.com, aoverton@mwsgw.com Stephen W. Jones sjones@jlj.com, linda.calloway@jlj.com John W. Walker johnwalkeratty@aol.com, jspringer@gabrielmail.com, 1orap72297@aol.com Mark Terry Burnette mburnette@mbbwi.com John Clayburn Fendley, Jr clayfendley@comcast.net, yeldnef@yahoo.com Scott P. Richardson scott.richardson@arkansasag.gov, agcivil@arkansasag.gov, patsy.dooley@arkansasag.gov Office of Desegregation Monitor andreeroaf@odmemail.com, aroaf@seark.net, paramer@odmemail.com 4:82-cv-866 Notice has been delivered by other means to: Norman J. Chachkin 8/3 1/2007 NAACP Legal Defense \u0026amp; Educational Fund, Inc. - New York 99 Hudson Street Suite 1600 New York, NY 10013 Timothy Gerard Gauger Arkansas Attorney General's Office Catlett-Prien Tower Building 323 Center Street Suite 200 Little Rock, AR 72201-2610 James M. Llewellyn , Jr Thompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn, P.A. Post Office Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 William P. Thompson Thompson \u0026amp; Llewellyn, P.A. Post Office Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 The following document(s) are associated. with this transaction: Document description:Main Document Original filename:n/a Electronic document Stamp: [ST AMP dcecfStamp ID= 1095794525 [Date=8/30/2007] [FileNumber=986709-0] [638fbf95750fdb2bcc38d438al 759982e6393219filca65cfc6afbfedl 6b241432el 9 4ccf6c1097234311a6eab7650d2f8c784aed51ed8blcdlae3ed31fac7cel]] 8/31/2007 Page 2 of2 This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\u003c/dcterms_description\u003e\n \n\n\u003c/dcterms_description\u003e \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/items\u003e"},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_99","title":"Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2008-11"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Little Rock (Ark.). Office of Desegregation Monitoring","School integration--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Project managers--Implements"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/99"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["project management"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nDr. T. Kenneth James Commissioner State Board of Education Randy Lawson Bentonville Chair Dr. Naccaman Will iams Springdale Vice Chair Sherry Burrow Jonesboro Jim Cooper Melbourne Brenda Gullett Fayetteville Sam Lerlbetter Little Rock Alice Mahony El Dorado Dr. Ben Mays Clinton Diane Tatum Pine Bluff - ur Capitol Mall ttle Rock, AR 72201 -1019 (501 ) 682-4475 ArkansasEd.org An Equal Opportunity Employer ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION November 26, 2008 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0 . Box 1510 LittleRock, AR 72203-1510 9NIH011NOW NOl1V93H93S30 ~O 33H~O 800Z T -- J.::: J 031\\13~31:1 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. M. Samuel Jones III Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al., U.S. District Court No. 4:82-CV-866 WRW Everyone: By way of this letter, I am advising you that I am filing the Arkansas Department of Education's Project Management Tool for the month of November 2008 in the above-referenced case. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (501) 682-4227 should you require additional information. Sincerely, ~C-~~ Jeremy Lasiter General Counsel cc: Mr. Scott Richardson, Assistant Attorney General ECEIVED [:: - 1 2008 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. CASE NO. LR-C-82-866 WR\\V PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (Department) hereby gives notice of the filing of the Department's Project Management Tool for November, 2008. Respectfully submitted, C. Lasiter, Bar No. 2001-2005 General Counsel Arkansas Department of Education Four Capitol Mall, Room 404-A Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 682-4227 jeremy.lasiter@arkansas.gov CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Jeremy Lasiter, certify that on November 26, 2008, I caused the foregoing document to be served by depositing a copy in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to each of the following: Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 LittleRock,AR 72203-1510 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. M. Samuel Jones, III Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard 425 West Capitol, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 72201 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. - IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 C. Process and distribute State MFPA. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 D. Determine the number of Magnet students residing in each District and attending a Magnet School. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as ordered by the Court. 2 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 - eafG lated:a ,f),cto.b~fj*2~fgij It should be noted that currently the Magnet Review Committee is reporting this information instead of the staff attorney as indicated in the Implementation Plan. F. Calculate state aid due the LRSD based upon the Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 ,_a~e\u0026lt;lontn~j r:i ,. [FY o uby. '~ ~ ~~~J~:11.!ELIB\u0026gt;:J G. Process and distribute state aid for Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 H. Calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school district is entitled. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 Auditor revision payments for FY 07/08 at September 3, 2008 were: LRSD - $342, 160 NLRSD - $185,648 PCSSD - $590,858 .e5Lcm)~J~nL(?rl1}a_tJ_~!JAVa~a_ 08/0%_ subject to c.adi 3 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, September - June. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 J. Districts submit an estimated Magnet and M-to-M transportation budget to ADE. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, December of each year. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 In September 2007, the Magnet and M-to-M transportation budgets for FY 07/08 were submitted to the ADE by the Districts. K. The Coordinator of School Transportation notifies General Finance to pay districts for the Districts' proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 In April 2008, General Finance was notified to pay the second one-third payment for FY 07/08 to the Districts. In September 2008, General Finance was notified to pay the third one-third payment for FY 07/08 to the Districts. In September 2008, General Finance was notified to pay the first one-third payment for FY 08/09 to the Districts. It should be noted that the Transportation Coordinator is currently performing this function instead of Reginald Wilson as indicated in the Implementation Plan. 4 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) L. ADE pays districts three equal installments of their proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 In April 2008, General Finance made the second one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 07/08 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At April 30, 2008, the following had been paid for FY 07/08: LRSD - $2,802,393.34 NLRSD- $819,833.10 PCSSD - $2,255,969.00 In September 2008, General Finance made the last one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 07 /08 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 30, 2008, the following had been paid for FY 07/08: LRSD - $4,460,451.00 NLRSD - $1 ,232,311.77 PCSSD - $2,948,764.22 In September 2008, General Finance made the first one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 08/09 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 30, 2008, the following had been paid for FY 08/09: LRSD - $1 ,428,235.67 NLRSD - $419,360.19 PCSSD - $1 ,114,952.61 M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 5 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) In August 1997, the ADE transportation coordinator reviewed each district's Magnet and M-to-M transportation costs for FY 96/97. In July 1998, each district was asked to submit an estimated budget for the 98/99 school year. In September 1998, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 98/99 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. School districts should receive payment by October 1, 1998 In September 1999, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 99/00 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2000, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 00/01 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2001 , paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 01/02 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2002, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 02/03 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2003, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 03/04 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2004, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 04/05 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In October 2005, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 05/06 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2006, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 06/07 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2007, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 07/08 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2008, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 08/09 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. 6 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as stated in Exhibit A of the Implementation Plan. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) In FY 94/95, the State purchased 52 buses at a cost of $1 ,799,431 which were added to or replaced existing Magnet and M-to-M buses in the Districts. The buses were distributed to the Districts as follows: LRSD - 32\nNLRSD - 6\nand PCSSD -14. The ADE purchased 64 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $2,334,800 in FY 95/96. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 45\nNLRSD - 7\nand PCSSD - 12. In May 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $646,400. In July 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $624,879. In July 1998, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $695,235. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD-6. Specifications for 16 school buses have been forwarded to state purchasing for bidding in January, 1999 for delivery in July, 1999. In July 1999, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $718,355. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD- 6. In July 2000, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $724,165. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD-6. The bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was let by State Purchasing on February 22, 2001. The contract was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include two 47 passenger buses for $43,426.00 each and fourteen 65 passenger buses for $44,289.00 each. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 2 of the 47 passenger and 4 of the 65 passenger buses. On August 2, 2001, the ADE took possession of 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $706,898. 7 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) In June 2002, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include five 47 passenger buses for $42,155.00 each, ten 65 passenger buses for $43,850.00 each, and one 47 passenger bus with a wheelchair lift for $46,952.00. The total amount was $696,227. In August of 2002, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $696,227. In June 2003, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include 5 - 47 passenger buses for $47,052.00 each, and 11 - 65 passenger buses for $48,895.00 each. The total amount was $773,105. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 5 of the 47 passenger and 1 of the 65 passenger buses. In June 2004, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The price for the buses was $49,380 each for a total cost of $790,080. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8, NLRSD - 2, and PCSSD - 6. In June 2005, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses for the LRSD include 8 - 65 passenger buses for $53,150.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 1 - 47 passenger bus for $52,135.00, and 1 - 65 passenger bus for $53,150.00. The buses for the PCSSD include 6 - 65 passenger buses for $53,150.00 each. The total amount was $849,385.00. In March 2006, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Central States Bus Sales. The buses for the LRSD include 8 - 65 passenger buses for $56,810.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 1 - 47 passenger bus for $54,990.00, and 1 - 65 passenger bus for $56,810.00. The buses for the PCSSD include 6 - 65 passenger buses for $56,810.00 each. The total amount was $907,140.00. In March 2007, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Central States Bus Sales. The buses for the LRSD include 4 - 47 passenger buses for $63,465.00 each, and 4 - 65 passenger buses for $66,390.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 2 - 47 passenger buses for $63,465.00 each. The buses for the PCSSD include 1 - 65 passenger bus with a lift for $72,440.00 and 5 - 47 passenger buses for $63,465.00 each. The total amount was $1,036,115.00. 8 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) In July 2007, 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses were delivered to the districts in Pulaski County. Finance paid Central States Bus Sales $1 ,036,115. In March 2008, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Central States Bus Sales. The buses for the LRSD include 8 - 65 passenger buses for $66,405.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 1 - 65 passenger bus with a wheelchair lift for $72,850.00 and 1 - 47 passenger bus with a wheelchair lift for $70,620.00. The buses for the PCSSD include 2 - 65 passenger buses for $66,405.00 each, 2 - 47 passenger buses for $65,470.00 each and 2 - 47 passenger buses with wheelchair lifts for $70,620.00 each. The total amount was $1 ,079,700.00. In July 2008, 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses were delivered to the districts in Pulaski County. Finance paid Central States Bus Sales $1,079,700. 0. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to LRSD as required by page 23 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 and January 1, of each school year through January 1, 1999. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 Obligation fulfilled in FY 96/97. P. Process and distribute additional payments in lieu of formula to LRSD as required by page 24 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. Q. Process and distribute payments to PCSSD as required by Page 28 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1994. 9 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) Q. Process and distribute payments to PCSSD as required by Page 28 of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) Final payment was distributed July 1994. R. Upon loan request by LRSD accompanied by a promissory note, the ADE makes loans to LRSD. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing through July 1, 1999. See Settlement Agreement page 24. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 The LRSD received $3,000,000 on September 10, 1998. As of this reporting date, the LRSD has received $20,000,000 in loan proceeds. S. Process and distribute payments in lieu of formula to PCSSD required by page 29 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. 2. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. Actual as of November 30, 2008 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. T. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to NLRSD as required by page 31 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 of each school year through June 30, 1996. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. U. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 10 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) U. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 00/01 . Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01 /02 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 04/05. Distribution in July 2005 for FY 05/06 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 05/06. Distribution in July 2006 for FY 06/07 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 06/07. Distribution in July 2007 for FY 07/08 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 07/08. Distribution in July 2008 for FY 08/09 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 08/09. V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. 1. Projected Ending Date Not applicable. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 11 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 00/01. Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 04/05. Distribution in July 2005 for FY 05/06 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 05/06. Distribution in July 2006 for FY 06/07 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 06/07. Distribution in July 2007 for FY 07/08 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 07/08. Distribution in July 2008 for FY 08/09 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 08/09. 12 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION A Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. 1. Projected Ending Date January 15, 1995 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 In May 1995, monitors completed the unannounced visits of schools in Pulaski County. The monitoring process involved a qualitative process of document reviews, interviews, and observations. The monitoring focused on progress made since the announced monitoring visits. In June 1995, monitoring data from unannounced visits was included in the July Semiannual Report. Twenty-five per cent of all classrooms were visited, and all of the schools in Pulaski County were monitored. All principals were interviewed to determine any additional progress since the announced visits. The July 1995 Monitoring Report was reviewed by the ADE administrative team, the Arkansas State Board of Education, and the Districts and filed with the Court. The report was formatted in accordance with the Allen Letter. In October 1995, a common terminology was developed by principals from the Districts and the Lead Planning and Desegregation staff to facilitate the monitoring process. The announced monitoring visits began on November 14, 1995 and were completed on January 26, 1996. Copies of the preliminary Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the ADE administrative team and the State Board of Education in January 1996. A report on the current status of the Cycle 5 schools in the ECOE process and their school improvement plans was filed with the Court on February 1, 1996. The unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1996 and ended on May 10, 1996. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and the data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Districts provided data on enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Districts and the ADE Desegregation Monitoring staff developed a definition for instructional programs. 13 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) ' A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996 with copies distributed to the parties. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996 and concluded in December 1996. In January 1997, presentations were made to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties to review the draft Semiannual Monitoring Report. The monitoring instrument and process were evaluated for their usefulness in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on achievement disparities. In February 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was filed. Unannounced monitoring visits began on February 3, 1997 and concluded in May 1997. In March 1997, letters were sent to the Districts regarding data requirements for the July 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and the additional discipline data element that was requested by the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Desegregation data collection workshops were conducted in the Districts from March 28, 1997 to April 7, 1997. A meeting was conducted on April 3, 1997 to finalize plans for the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report. Onsite visits were made to Cycle 1 schools who did not submit accurate and timely data on discipline, M-to-M transfers, and policy. The July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were finalized in June 1997. In July 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were filed with the court, and the ADE sponsored a School Improvement Conference. On July 10, 1997, copies of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were made available to the Districts for their review prior to filing it with the Court. In August 1997, procedures and schedules were organized for the monitoring of the Cycle 2 schools in FY 97/98. 14 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) A Desegregation Monitoring and School Improvement Workshop for the Districts was held on September 10, 1997 to discuss monitoring expectations, instruments, data collection and school improvement visits. On October 9, 1997, a planning meeting was held with the desegregation monitoring staff to discuss deadlines, responsibilities, and strategic planning issues regarding the Semiannual Monitoring Report. Reminder letters were sent to the Cycle 2 principals outlining the data collection deadlines and availability of technical assistance. In October and November 1997, technical assistance visits were conducted, and announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 2 schools were completed. In December 1997 and January 1998, technical assistance visits were conducted regarding team visits, technical review recommendations, and consensus building. Copies of the infusion document and perceptual surveys were provided to schools in the ECOE process. The February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report was submitted for review and approval to the State Board of Education, the Director, the Administrative Team, the Attorney General's Office, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process, external team visits and finalizing school improvement plans. On February 18, 1998, the representatives of all parties met to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. Additional meetings will be scheduled. Unannounced monitoring visits were conducted in March 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process and external team visits. In April 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were conducted, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. 15 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) In May 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. On May 18, 1998, the Court granted the ADE relief from its obligation to file the July 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report to develop proposed modifications to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. In June 1998, monitoring information previously submitted by the districts in the Spring of 1998 was reviewed and prepared for historical files and presentation to the Arkansas State Board. Also, in June the following occurred: a) The Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed, b) the Semiannual Monitoring COE Data Report was completed, c) progress reports were submitted from previous cycles, and d.) staff development on assessment (SAT-9) and curriculum alignment was conducted with three supervisors. In July, the Lead Planner provided the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee with (1) a review of the court Order relieving ADE of its obligation to file a July Semiannual Monitoring Report, and (2) an update of ADE's progress toward work with the parties and ODM to develop proposed revisions to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. The Committee encouraged ODM, the parties and the ADE to continue to work toward revision of the monitoring and reporting process. In August 1998, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Attorney General, the Assistant Director for Accountability and the Education Lead Planner updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and proposed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. In September 1998, tentative monitoring dates were established and they will be finalized once proposed revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring Plan are finalized and approved. In September/October 1998, progress was being made on the proposed revisions to the monitoring process by committee representatives of all the Parties in the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement. While the revised monitoring plan is finalized and approved, the ADE monitoring staff will continue to provide technical assistance to schools upon request. 16 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) In December 1998, requests were received from schools in PCSSD regarding test score analysis and staff Development. Oak Grove is scheduled for January 21 , 1999 and Lawson Elementary is also tentatively scheduled in January. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD has been rescheduled for April 2000. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD was conducted on May 5, 2000 and May 9, 2000 respectively. Staff development regarding classroom management was provided to the Franklin Elementary School in LRSD on November 8, 2000. Staff development regarding ways to improve academic achievement was presented to College Station Elementary in PCSSD on November 22, 2000. On November 1, 2000, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Director for Accountability updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and discussed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for February 27, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group meeting that was scheduled for February 27 had to be postponed. It will be rescheduled as soon as possible. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting is scheduled for June 27, 2001. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from June 27. It will take place on July 26, 2001 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 17 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) On July 26, 2001 , the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 11, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. On October 11, 2001 , the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the ADE's intent to take a proactive role in Desegregation Monitoring. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 10, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting that was scheduled for January 10 was postponed. It has been rescheduled for February 14, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On February 12, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 11 , 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On April 11, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 11 , 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. 18 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual' as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) On July 18, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, talked about section XV in the Project Management Tool (PMT) on Standardized Test Selection to Determine Loan Forgiveness. She said that the goal has been completed, and no additional reporting is required for section XV. Mr. Morris discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. He handed out a Court Order from May 9, 2002, which contained comments from U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr., about hearings on the LRSD request for unitary status. Mr. Morris also handed out a document from the Secretary of Education about the No Child Left Behind Act. There was discussion about how this could have an affect on Desegregation issues. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 10, 2002 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from October 10. It will take place on October 29, 2002 in room 201-A at 1:30 p.m. at the ADE. On October 29, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Meetings with the parties to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan will be postponed by request of the school districts in Pulaski County. Additional meetings could be scheduled after the Desegregation ruling is finalized. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 9, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On January 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. No Child Left Behind and the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD were discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from April 10. It will take place on April 24, 2003 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 19 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) On April 24, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Laws passed by the legislature need to be checked to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Ray Lumpkin was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he left, we will discuss the legislation with Clearance Lovell. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On August 28, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The LRSD has been instructed to submit evidence showing progress in reducing disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. This is supposed to be done by March of 2004, so that the LRSD can achieve unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 9, 2003 at the ADE. On October 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 8, 2004 at the ADE. On October 16, 2003, ADE staff met with the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee at the State Capitol. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, and Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, presented the Chronology of activity by the ADE in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan for the Desegregation Settlement Agreement. They also discussed the role of the ADE Desegregation Monitoring Section. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, reported on legal issues relating to the Pulaski County Desegregation Case. Ann Marshall shared a history of activities by ODM, and their view of the activity of the school districts in Pulaski County. John Kunkel discussed Desegregation funding by the ADE. 20 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) On November 4, 2004, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The ADE is required to check laws that the legislature passes to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Clearence Lovell was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he has retired, the ADE attorney will find out who will be checking the next legislation. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 6, 2005 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On May 3, 2005, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The PCSSD has petitioned to be released from some desegregation monitoring. There was discussion in the last legislative session that suggested all three districts in Pulaski County should seek unitary status. Legislators also discussed the possibility of having two school districts in Pulaski County instead of three. An Act was passed by the Legislature to conduct a feasability study of having only a north school district and a south school district in Pulaski County. Removing Jacksonville from the PCSSD is also being studied. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 7, 2005 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On June 20, 2006, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. ADE staff from the Office of Public School Academic Accountability updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The purpose, content, and due date for information going into the Project Management Tool and its Executive Summary were reported. There was discussion about the three districts in Pulaski County seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 17, 2006 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 21 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) On March 16, 2007, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review previous Implementation Phase activities. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, reported that U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr. declared the LRSD unitary and released the district from federal court supervision. It was stated that the ADE should continue desegregation reporting until the deadline for an appeal filing has past, or until an appeal has been denied. House Bill 1829 passed the House and Senate. This says the ADE should hire consultants to determine whether and in what respects any of the Pulaski County districts are unitary. It authorizes the ADE and the Attorney General to seek proper federal court review and determination of the current unitary status and allows the State of Arkansas to continue payments under a post-unitary agreement to the three Pulaski County districts for a time period not to exceed seven years. The three Pulaski County districts may be reimbursed for legal fees incurred for seeking unitary or partial unitary status if their motions seeking unitary status or partial unitary status are filed no later than October 30, 2007, and the school districts are declared unitary or at least partially unitary by the federal district court no later than June 14, 2008. Matt McCoy and Scott Richardson from the Attorney General's Office updated the group on legal issues related to desegregation. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 5, 2007 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On July 12, 2007, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. He handed out the syllabus of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling from June 28, 2007 about the Seattle School District. The court ruled that the district could no longer use race as the only criteria for making certain elementary school assignments and to rule on transfer requests. Mr. Scott Richardson from the Attorney General's Office said that an expert was going to study the Pulaski County school districts and see what they need to do to become unitary. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 4, 2007 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 22 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) On October 11 , 2007, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. He handed out news articles about the LRSD being declared unitary and the Joshua intervenors filing a notice of appeal to the 8th Circuit Court. The LRSD and the Joshua intervenors have asked that the appeal be put on hold while they pursue a mediated settlement. Mr. Scott Richardson from the Attorney General's Office said that the LRSD had until October 31 to respond to the appeal filed by the Joshua intervenors. He said that the NLRSD was trying to get total unitary status and the PCSSD was working on getting unitary status in their student assignment. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 10, 2008 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On January 10, 2008, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. He handed out news articles about the districts in Pulaski County seeking unitary status. The Joshua lntervenors filed a motion with the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn the ruling that gave the Little Rock School District unitary status. The Little Rock School District filed its response to the motion by the Joshua lntervenors. After the Pulaski County Special School District sought unitary status, the Joshua lntervenors requested that school desegregation monitors do a study on the quality of facilities in the district, or on the district's compliance with its desegregation plan. Judge Wilson denied the requests by Joshua lntervenors. The North Little Rock School District asked for unitary status and Joshua lntervenors objected and asked for a hearing. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 10, 2008 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 23 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) On April 10, 2008, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. House Bill 1829 that passed in 2007, allowed Pulaski County districts to be reimbursed for legal fees incurred for seeking unitary or partial unitary status if they are declared unitary or at least partially unitary by the federal district court no later than June 14 of 2008. Act 2 was passed in the special legislative session that started March 31 , 2008. This extends the deadline for unitary status to be reimbursed for legal fees from June 14 to December 31 . Also discussed in the Implementation Phase meeting was the push by Jacksonville residents to establish a Jacksonville School District. On April 15, 2008, the PCSSD School Board voted 4-2 against letting Jacksonville leave the district. In 2003, U. S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr., stopped an election in Jacksonville on forming an independent district. He said that taking Jacksonville out of the PCSSD would hinder efforts to comply with the court approved desegregation plan. A request by the PCSSD for unitary status is pending in federal district court. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 10, 2008 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On July 10, 2008, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. He handed out a news article that talked about an evaluation of the North Little Rock School District's compliance with its desegregation plan. The evaluation was done by the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM), a federal desegregation monitoring office. ODM said \"NLRSD has almost no compliance issues that would hinder its bid for unitary status\". Another article said that ODM has proposed a 2008-09 budget that would allow for closing at the end of December 2008 if the school districts in Pulaski County are declared unitary before then. Each of the districts has petitioned U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr. for unitary status. Another article was handed out stating that legislators, attorneys from the Attorney General's Office and representatives of the three school districts in Pulaski County have been conducting meetings to discuss ways to phase out desegregation payments. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 9, 2008 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 24 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) On October 9, 2008, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Meetings have been taking place to prepare for the possibility that the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upholds the ruling that gave the Little Rock School District unitary status. The LRSD has requested that for the next seven years, the three school districts in Pulaski County continue to receive the same amount of desegregation funding that they will receive this year. The LRSD also asked for restrictions on new charter schools in Pulaski County, protection from sanctions if they are in fiscal or academic distress, and a new state-funded education service cooperative in Pulaski County. In a September 17 update on the status of the PCSSD implementation of its desegregation plan, the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM) stated that in some PCSSD schools, black males have suspension rates above 50%. ODM stated that \"districtwide, discipline rates continue to climb\" and black males \"have discipline rates far out of proportion to their presence in the student body.\" Issues listed in the ODM report lead them to \"suggest that PCSSD is not presently in the posture to either seek or be awarded unitary status by the district court.\" The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 8, 2009 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201 -A at the ADE. 25 Ill. A PETITION FOR ELECTION FOR LRSD WILL BE SUPPORTED SHOULD A MILLAGE BE REQUIRED A. Monitor court pleadings to determine if LRSD has petitioned the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 Ongoing. All Court pleadings are monitored monthly. B. Draft and file appropriate pleadings if LRSD petitions the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 To date, no action has been taken by the LRSD. 26 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION A. Using a collaborative approach, immediately identify those laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date December, 1994 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. 8. Conduct a review within ADE of existing legislation and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. C. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. Request of the other parties to the Settlement Agreement that they identify laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. D. Submit proposals to the State Board of Education for repeal of those regulations that are confirmed to be impediments to desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. 27 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 A committee within the ADE was formed in May 1995 to review and collect data on existing legislation and regulations identified by the parties as impediments to desegregation. The committee researched the Districts' concerns to determine if any of the rules, regulations, or legislation cited impede desegregation. The legislation cited by the Districts regarding loss funding and worker's compensation were not reviewed because they had already been litigated. In September 1995, the committee reviewed the following statutes, acts, and regulations: Act 113 of 1993\nADE Director's Communication 93-205\nAct 145 of 1989\nADE Director's Memo 91-67\nADE Program Standards Eligibility Criteria for Special Education\nArkansas Codes 6-18-206, 6-20-307, 6-20-319, and 6-17- 1506. In October 1995, the individual reports prepared by committee members in their areas of expertise and the data used to support their conclusions were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. A report was prepared and submitted to the State Board of Education in July 1996. The report concluded that none of the items reviewed impeded desegregation. As of February 3, 1997, no laws or regulations have been determined to impede desegregation efforts. Any new education laws enacted during the Arkansas 81st Legislative Session will be reviewed at the close of the legislative session to ensure that they do not impede desegregation. In April 1997, copies of all laws passed during the 1997 Regular Session of the 81 st General Assembly were requested from the office of the ADE Liaison to the Legislature for distribution to the Districts for their input and review of possible impediments to their desegregation efforts. In August 1997, a meeting to review the statutes passed in the prior legislative session was scheduled for September 9, 1997. 28 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) On September 9, 1997, a meeting was held to discuss the review of the statutes passed in the prior legislative session and new ADE regulations. The Districts will be contacted in writing for their input regarding any new laws or regulations that they feel may impede desegregation .. Additionally, the Districts will be asked to review their regulations to ensure that they do not impede their desegregation efforts. The committee will convene on December 1, 1997 to review their findings and finalize their report to the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. In October 1997, the Districts were asked to review new regulations and statutes for impediments to their desegregation efforts, and advise the ADE, in writing, if they feel a regulation or statute may impede their desegregation efforts. In October 1997, the Districts were requested to advise the ADE, in writing, no later than November 1, 1997 of any new law that might impede their desegregation efforts. As of November 12, 1997, no written responses were received from the Districts. The ADE concludes that the Districts do not feel that any new law negatively impacts their desegregation efforts. The committee met on December 1, 1997 to discuss their findings regarding statutes and regulations that may impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. The committee concluded that there were no laws or regulations that impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. It was decided that the committee chair would prepare a report of the committee's findings for the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation is now reviewing proposed bills and regulations, as well as laws that are being signed in, for the current 1999 legislative session. They will continue to do so until the session is over. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation will meet on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The committee met on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The purpose of the meeting was to identify rules and regulations that might impede desegregation, and review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. This is a standing committee that is ongoing and a report will be submitted to the State Board of Education once the process is completed. 29 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) The committee met on May 24, 1999 at the ADE. The committee was asked to review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. The committee determined that Mr. Ray Lumpkin would contact the Pulaski County districts to request written response to any rules, regulations or laws that might impede desegregation. The committee would also collect information and data to prepare a report for the State Board. This will be a standing committee. This data gathering will be ongoing until the final report is given to the State Board. On July 26, 1999, the committee met at the ADE. The committee did not report any laws or regulations that they currently thought would impede desegregation, and are still waiting for a response from the three districts in Pulaski County. The committee met on August 30, 1999 at the ADE to review rules and regulations that might impede desegregation. At that time, there were no laws under review that appeared to impede desegregation. In November, the three districts sent letters to the ADE stating that they have reviewed the laws passed by the 82nd legislative session as well as current rules \u0026amp; regulations and district policies to ensure that they have no ill effect on desegregation efforts. There was some concern from PCSSD concerning a charter school proposal in the Maumelle area. The work of the committee is on-going each month depending on the information that comes before the committee. Any rules, laws or regulations that would impede desegregation will be discussed and reported to the State Board of Education. On October 4, 2000, the ADE presented staff development for assistant superintendents in LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD regarding school laws of Arkansas. The ADE is in the process of forming a committee to review all Rules and Regulations from the ADE and State Laws that might impede desegregation. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will review all new laws that might impede desegregation once the 83rd General Assembly has completed this session. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will meet for the first time on June 11 , 2001 at 9:00 a.m. in room 204-A at the ADE. The committee will review all new laws that might impede desegregation that were passed during the 2001 Legislative Session. 30 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations rescheduled the meeting that was planned for June 11 , in order to review new regulations proposed to the State Board of Education. The meeting will take place on July 16, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on July 16, 2001 at the ADE. The following Items were discussed: (1) Review of 2001 state laws which appear to impede desegregation. (2) Review of existing ADE regulations which appear to impede desegregation. (3) Report any laws or regulations found to impede desegregation to the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts. The next meeting will take place on August 27, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on August 27, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on September 10, 2001 in Conference Room 204-8 at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on September 10, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on October 24, 2001 in Conference Room 204-8 at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on October 24, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. On December 17, 2001, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation composed letters that will be sent to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. Laws to review include those of the 83rd General Assembly, ADE regulations, and regulations of the Districts. 31 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) On January 10, 2002, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to respond by March 8, 2002. On March 5, 2002, A letter was sent from the LRSD which mentioned Act 1748 and Act 1667 passed during the 83rd Legislative Session which may impede desegregation. These laws will be researched to determine if changes need to be made. A letter was sent from the NLRSD on March 19, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation. On April 26, 2002, A letter was sent for the PCSSD to the ADE, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation except the \"deannexation\" legislation which the District opposed before the Senate committee. On October 27, 2003, the ADE sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County asking if there were any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to review laws passed during the 84th Legislative Session, any new ADE rules or regulations, and district policies. In July 2007, the ADE sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County asking if there were any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to review laws passed during the 86th Legislative Session, and any new ADE rules or regulations. 32 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES A. Through a preamble to the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1 . Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 The preamble was contained in the Implementation Plan filed with the Court on March 15, 1994. B. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 Ongoing C. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement by actions taken by ADE in response to monitoring results. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 Ongoing D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 33 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 At each regular monthly meeting of the State Board of Education, the Board is provided copies of the most recent Project Management Tool (PMT) and an executive summary of the PMT for their review and approval. Only activities that are in addition to the Board's monthly review of the PMT are detailed below. In May 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the total number of schools visited during the monitoring phase and the data collection process. Suggestions were presented to the State Board of Education on how recommendations could be presented in the monitoring reports. In June 1995, an update on the status of the pending Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the State Board of Education. In July 1995, the July Semiannual Monitoring Report was reviewed by the State Board of Education. On August 14, 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the need to increase minority participation in the teacher scholarship program and provided tentative monitoring dates to facilitate reporting requests by the ADE administrative team and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In September 1995, the State Board of Education was advised of a change in the PMT from a table format to a narrative format. The Board was also briefed about a meeting with the Office of Desegregation Monitoring regarding the PMT. In October 1995, the State Board of Education was updated on monitoring timelines. The Board was also informed of a meeting with the parties regarding a review of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and the monitoring process, and the progress of the test validation study. In November 1995, a report was made to the State Board of Education regarding the monitoring schedule and a meeting with the parties concerning the development of a common terminology for monitoring purposes. In December 1995, the State Board of Education was updated regarding announced monitoring visits. In January 1996, copies of the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the State Board of Education. 34 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) During the months of February 1996 through May 1996, the PMT report was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. In June 1996, the State Board of Education was updated on the status of the bias review study. In July 1996, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the Court, the parties, ODM, the State Board of Education, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In August 1996, the State Board of Education and the ADE administrative team were provided with copies of the test validation study prepared by Dr. Paul Williams. During the months of September 1996 through December 1996, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. On January 13, 1997, a presentation was made to the State Board of Education regarding the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report, and copies of the report and its executive summary were distributed to all Board members. The Project Management Tool and its executive summary were addressed at the February 10, 1997 State Board of Education meeting regarding the ADE's progress in fulfilling their obligations as set forth in the Implementation Plan. In March 1997, the State Board of Education was notified that historical information in the PMT had been summarized at the direction of the Assistant Attorney General in order to reduce the size and increase the clarity of the report. The Board was updated on the Pulaski County Desegregation Case and reviewed the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued by the Court on February 18, 1997 in response to the Districts' motion for summary judgment on the issue of state funding for teacher retirement matching contributions. During the months of April 1997 through June 1997, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. The State Board of Education received copies of the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and executive summary at the July Board meeting. 35 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on August 4, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. A special report regarding a historical review of the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement and the ADE's role and monitoring obligations were presented to the State Board of Education on September 8, 1997. Additionally, the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Board for their review. In October 1997, a special draft report regarding disparity in achievement was submitted to the State Board Chairman and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In November 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on November 3, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. In December 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. In January 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and discussed ODM's report on the ADE's monitoring activities and instructed the Director to meet with the parties to discuss revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. In February 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and discussed the February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report. In March 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary and was provided an update regarding proposed revisions to the monitoring process. In April 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In May 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. 36 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) In June 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also reviewed how the ADE would report progress in the PMT concerning revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In July 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also received an update on Test Validation, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee Meeting, and revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In August 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the five discussion points regarding the proposed revisions to the monitoring and reporting process. The Board also reviewed the basic goal of the Minority Recruitment Committee. In September 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed the proposed modifications to the Monitoring plans by reviewing the common core of written response received from the districts. The primary commonalities were (1) Staff Development, (2) Achievement Disparity and (3) Disciplinary Disparity. A meeting of the parties is scheduled to be conducted on Thursday, September 17, 1998. The Board encouraged the Department to identify a deadline for Standardized Test Validation and Test Selection. In October 1998, the Board received the progress report on Proposed Revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring and Reporting Process (see XVIII). The Board also reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In November, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the proposed revisions in the Desegregation monitoring Process and the update on Test validation and Test Selection provisions of the Settlement Agreement. The Board was also notified that the Implementation Plan Working Committee held its quarterly meeting to review progress and identify quarterly priorities. In December, the State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion by the ADE, the LRSD, NLRSD, and the PCSSD, to relieve the Department of its obligation to file a February Semiannual Monitoring Report. The Board was also notified that the Joshua lntervenors filed a motion opposing the joint motion. The Board was informed that the ADE was waiting on a response from Court. 37 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) In January, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion of the ADE, LRSD, PCSSD, and NLRSD for an order relieving the ADE of filing a February 1999 Monitoring Report. The motion was granted subject to the following three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua intervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement. In February, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was informed that the three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua lntervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement had been satisfied. The Joshua lntervenors were invited again to attend the meeting of the parties and they attended on January 13, and January 28, 1999. They are also scheduled to attend on February 17, 1998. The report of progress, a collaborative effort from all parties was presented to court on February 1, 1999. The Board was also informed that additional items were received for inclusion in the revised report, after the deadline for the submission of the progress report and the ADE would: (1) check them for feasibility, and fiscal impact if any, and (2) include the items in future drafts of the report. In March, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received and reviewed the Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Progress Report submitted to Court on February 1, 1999. On April 12, and May 10, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On June 14, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. 38 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) On July 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On August 9, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On September 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On October 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was notified that on September 21 , 1999 that the Office of Education Lead Planning and Desegregation Monitoring meet before the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee and presented them with the draft version of the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan. The State Board was notified that the plan would be submitted for Board review and approval when finalized. On November 8, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. 39 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) On May 8, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 12, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and. its executive summary for the month of July. On September 11 , 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 9, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 11 , 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 8, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 12, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 12, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 9, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 14, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 11, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. 40 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) On July 9, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 13, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 10, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 8, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 19, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 10, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 11 , 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 11 , 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 13, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 10, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 12, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. 41 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) On September 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 18, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 14, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 12, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 9, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 11 , 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 8, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. 42 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) On January 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 10, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 14, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 11, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On January 10, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of November and December. On February 14, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 14, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 11, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. 43 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) On May 9, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 13, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 11, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 8, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 12, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 10, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 14, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On January 9, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of November and December. On February 13, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 13, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 10, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 8, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 12, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 10, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. 44 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) On August 14, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 11 , 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 9, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 13, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 11 , 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 17, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 12, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 12, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 9, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 14, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 11 , 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 9, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 13, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 10, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 8, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. 45 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) On November 5, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 10, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 15, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 11 , 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 10, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 21 , 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 12, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 9, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 14, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 11 , 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 8, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 13, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. QI} Nov~m,ber .3, 20Q8, the Ai'k'pnsas State ~oar of.\u0026amp;. ~he-PMT and ,ts executive suirimary fer themontflof 0 46 VI. REMEDIATION A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 During May 1995, team visits to Cycle 4 schools were conducted, and plans were developed for reviewing the Cycle 5 schools. In June 1995, the current Extended COE packet was reviewed, and enhancements to the Extended COE packet were prepared. In July 1995, year end reports were finalized by the Pulaski County field service specialists, and plans were finalized for reviewing the draft improvement plans of the Cycle 5 schools. In August 1995, Phase I - Cycle 5 school improvement plans were reviewed. Plans were developed for meeting with the Districts to discuss plans for Phase 11 - Cycle 1 schools of Extended COE, and a school improvement conference was conducted in Hot Springs. The technical review visits for the FY 95/96 year and the documentation process were also discussed. In October 1995, two computer programs, the Effective Schools Planner and the Effective Schools Research Assistant, were ordered for review, and the first draft of a monitoring checklist for Extended COE was developed. Through the Extended COE process, the field service representatives provided technical assistance based on the needs identified within the Districts from the data gathered. In November 1995, ADE personnel discussed and planned for the FY 95/96 monitoring, and onsite visits were conducted to prepare schools for the FY 95/96 team visits. Technical review visits continued in the Districts. In December 1995, announced monitoring and technical assistance visits were conducted in the Districts. At December 31 , 1995, approximately 59% of the schools in the Districts had been monitored. Technical review visits were conducted during January 1996. In February 1996, announced monitoring visits and midyear monitoring reports were completed, and the field service specialists prepared for the spring NGA/COE peer team visits. 47 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) In March 1996, unannounced monitoring visits of Cycle 5 schools commenced, and two-day peer team visits of Cycle 5 schools were conducted. Two-day team visit materials, team lists and reports were prepared. Technical assistance was provided to schools in final preparation for team visits and to schools needing any school improvement information. In April and May 1996, the unannounced monitoring visits were completed. The unannounced monitoring forms were reviewed and included in the July monitoring report. The two-day peer team visits were completed, and annual COE monitoring reports were prepared. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits of the Cycle 5 schools were completed, and the data was analyzed. The Districts identified enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996, and copies were distributed to the parties. During August 1996, meetings were held with the Districts to discuss the monitoring requirements. Technical assistance meetings with Cycle 1 schools were planned for 96/97. The Districts were requested to record discipline data in accordance with the Allen Letter. In September 1996, recommendations regarding the ADE monitoring schedule for Cycle 1 schools and content layouts of the semiannual report were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. Training materials were developed and schedules outlined for Cycle 1 schools. In October 1996, technical assistance needs were identified and addressed to prepare each school for their team visits. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996. In December 1996, the announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools were completed, and technical assistance needs were identified from school site visits. In January 1997, the ECOE monitoring section identified technical assistance needs of the Cycle 1 schools, and the data was reviewed when the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, the State Board of Education, and the parties. 48 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) In February 1997, field service specialists prepared for the peer team visits of the Cycle 1 schools. NCA accreditation reports were presented to the NCA Committee, and NCA reports were prepared for presentation at the April NCA meeting in Chicago. From March to May 1997, 111 visits were made to schools or central offices to work with principals, ECOE steering committees, and designated district personnel concerning school improvement planning. A workshop was conducted on Learning Styles for Geyer Springs Elementary School. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 15-17, 1997. The conference included information on the process of continuous school improvement, results of the first five years of COE, connecting the mission with the school improvement plan, and improving academic performance. Technical assistance needs were evaluated for the FY 97/98 school year in August 1997. From October 1997 to February 1998, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives. Technical assistance was provided to the Districts through meetings with the ECOE steering committees, assistance in analyzing perceptual surveys, and by providing samples of school improvement plans, Gold File catalogs, and web site addresses to schools visited. Additional technical assistance was provided to the Districts through discussions with the ECOE committees and chairs about the process. In November 1997, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives in conjunction with the announced monitoring visits. Workshops on brainstorming and consensus building and asking strategic questions were held in January and February 1998. In March 1998, the field service representatives conducted ECOE team visits and prepared materials for the NCA workshop. Technical assistance was provided in workshops on the ECOE process and team visits. In April 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process and academically distressed schools. In May 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process, and team visits were conducted. 49 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) In June 1998, the Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 13-15, 1998. Major conference topics included information on the process of continuous school improvement, curriculum alignment, \"Smart Start,\" Distance Learning, using data to improve academic performance, educational technology, and multicultural education. All school districts in Arkansas were invited and representatives from Pulaski County attended. In September 1998, requests for technical assistance were received, visitation schedules were established, and assistance teams began visiting the Districts. Assistance was provided by telephone and on-site visits. The ADE provided inservice training on \"Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement\" at Gibbs Magnet Elementary school on October 5, 1998 at their request. The staff was taught how to increase test scores through data disaggregation, analysis, alignment, longitudinal achievement review, and use of individualized test data by student, teacher, class and content area. Information was also provided regarding the \"Smart Start\" and the \"Academic Distress\" initiatives. On October 20, 1998, ECOE technical assistance was provided to Southwest Jr. High School. B. Identify available resources for providing technical assistance for the specific condition, or circumstances of need, considering resources within ADE and the Districts, and also resources available from outside sources and experts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. C. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 50 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) C. D. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 An updated ERIC Search was conducted on May 15, 1995 to locate research on evaluating compensatory education programs. The ADE received the updated ERIC disc that covered material through March 1995. An ERIC search was conducted in September 30, 1996 to identify current research dealing with the evaluation of compensatory education programs, and the articles were reviewed. An ERi C search was conducted in April 1997 to identify current research on compensatory education programs and sent to the Cycle 1 principals and the field service specialists for their use. An Eric search was conducted in October 1998 on the topic of Compensatory Education and related descriptors. The search included articles with publication dates from 1997 through July 1998. Identify and research technical resources available to ADE and the Districts through programs and organizations such as the Desegregation Assistance Center in San Antonio, Texas. 1. Projected Ending Date Summer 1994 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. E. Solicit, obtain, and use available resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. 51 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 From March 1995 through July 1995, technical assistance and resources were obtained from the following sources: the Southwest Regional Cooperative\nUALR regarding train ing for monitors\nODM on a project management software\nADHE regarding data review and display\nand Phi Delta Kappa, the Desegregation Assistance Center and the Dawson Cooperative regarding perceptual surveys. Technical assistance was received on the Microsoft Project software in November 1995, and a draft of the PMT report using the new software package was presented to the ADE administrative team for review. In December 1995, a data manager was hired permanently to provide technical assistance with computer software and hardware. In October 1996, the field service specialists conducted workshops in the Districts to address their technical assistance needs and provided assistance for upcoming team visits. In November and December 1996, the field service specialists addressed technical assistance needs of the schools in the Districts as they were identified and continued to provide technical assistance for the upcoming team visits. In January 1997, a draft of the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties. The ECOE monitoring section of the report included information that identified technical assistance needs and resources available to the Cycle 1 schools. Technical assistance was provided during the January 29-31 , 1997 Title I MidWinter Conference. The conference emphasized creating a learning community by building capacity schools to better serve all children and empowering parents to acquire additional skills and knowledge to better support the education of their children. In February 1997, three ADE employees attended the Southeast Regional Conference on Educating Black Children. Participants received training from national experts who outlined specific steps that promote and improve the education of black children. 52 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) On March 6-9, 1997, three members of the ADE's Technical Assistance Section attended the National Committee for School Desegregation Conference. The participants received training in strategies for Excellence and Equity: Empowerment and Training for the Future. Specific information was received regarding the current status of court-ordered desegregation, unitary status, and resegregation and distributed to the Districts and ADE personnel. The field service specialists attended workshops in March on ACT testing and school improvement to identify technical assistance resources available to the Districts and the ADE that will facilitate desegregation efforts. ADE personnel attended the Eighth Annual Conference on Middle Level Education in Arkansas presented by the Arkansas Association of Middle Level Education on April 6-8, 1997. The theme of the conference was Sailing Toward New Horizons. In May 1997, the field service specialists attended the NCA annual conference and an inservice session with Mutiu Fagbayi. An Implementation Oversight Committee member participated in the Consolidated COE Plan inservice training. In June and July 1997, field service staff attended an SAT-9 testing workshop and participated in the three-day School Improvement Conference held in Hot Springs. The conference provided the Districts with information on the COE school improvement process, technical assistance on monitoring and assessing achievement, availability of technology for the classroom teacher, and teaching strategies for successful student achievement. In August 1997, field service personnel attended the ASCD Statewide Conference and the MEA Administrators Conference. On August 18, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held and presentations were made on the Early Literacy Learning in Arkansas (ELLA) program and the Schools of the 21st Century program. In September 1997, technical assistance was provided to the Cycle 2 principals on data collection for onsite and offsite monitoring. ADE personnel attended the Region VI Desegregation Conference in October 1997. Current desegregation and educational equity cases and unitary status issues were the primary focus of the conference. On October 14, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held in Paragould to enable members to observe a 21st Century school and a school that incorporates traditional and multi-age classes in its curriculum. 53 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) In November 1997, the field service representatives attended the Governor's Partnership Workshop to discuss how to tie the committee's activities with the ECOE process. In March 1998, the field service representatives attended a school improvement conference and conducted workshops on team building and ECOE team visits. Staff development seminars on Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement are scheduled for March 23, 1998 and March 27, 1998 for the Districts. In April 1998, the Districts participated in an ADE seminar to aid them in evaluating and improving student achievement. In August 1998, the Field Service Staff attended inservice to provide further assistance to schools, i.e., Title I Summer Planning Session, ADE session on Smart Start, and the School Improvement Workshops. All schools and districts in Pulaski County were invited to attend the \"Smart Start\" Summit November 9, 10, and 11 to learn more about strategies to increase student performance. \"Smart Start\" is a standards-driven educational initiative which emphasizes the articulation of clear standards for student achievement and accurate measures of progress against those standards through assessments, staff development and individual school accountability. The Smart Start Initiative focused on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. Representatives from all three districts attended. On January 21, 1998, the ADE provided staff development for the staff at Oak Grove Elementary School designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement. Using achievement data from Oak Grove, educators reviewed trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. On February 24, 1999, the ADE provided staff development for the administrative staff at Clinton Elementary School regarding analysis of achievement data. On February 15, 1999, staff development was rescheduled for Lawson Elementary School. The staff develo.pment program was designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement using achievement data from Lawson, educators reviewed the components of the Arkansas Smart Initiative, trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. Student Achievement Workshops were rescheduled for Southwest Jr. High in the Little Rock School District, and the Oak Grove Elementary School in the Pulaski County School District. 54 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) On April 30, 1999, a Student Achievement Workshop was conducted for Oak Grove Elementary School in PCSSD. The Student Achievement Workshop for Southwest Jr. High in LRSD has been rescheduled. On June 8, 1999, a workshop was presented to representatives from each of the Arkansas Education Service Cooperatives and representatives from each of the three districts in Pulaski County. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACT MP). On June 18, 1999, a workshop was presented to administrators of the NLRSD. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACTMP). On August 16, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACT MP program was presented during the preschool staff development activities for teaching assistant in the LRSD. On August 20, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACT MP program was presented during the preschool staff development activities for the Accelerated Learning Center in the LRSD. On September 13, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACTMP program were presented to the staff at Booker T. Washington Magnet Elementary School. On September 27, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was presented to the Middle and High School staffs of the NLRSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACT MP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On October 26, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was presented to LRSD personnel through a staff development training class. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACT MP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On December 7, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was scheduled for Southwest Middle School in the LRSD. The workshop was also set to cover the components of the new ACT MP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. However, Southwest Middle School administrators had a need to reschedule, therefore the workshop will be rescheduled. 55 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) On January 10, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for both Dr. Martin Luther King Magnet Elementary School \u0026amp; Little Rock Central High School. The workshops also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program , and ACT 999 of 1999. On March 1, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for all principals and district level administrators in the PCSSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On April 12, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for the LRSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. Targeted staffs from the middle and junior high schools in the three districts in Pulaski County attended the Smart Step Summit on May 1 and May 2. Training was provided regarding the overview of the \"Smart Step\" initiative, \"Standard and Accountability in Action,\" and \"Creating Learning Environments Through Leadership Teams.\" The ADE provided training on the development of alternative assessment September 12-13, 2000. Information was provided regarding the assessment of Special Education and LEP students. Representatives from each district were provided the opportunity to select a team of educators from each school within the district to participate in professional development regarding Integrating Curriculum and Assessment K-12. The professional development activity was directed by the national consultant, Dr. Heidi Hays Jacobs, on September 14 and 15, 2000. The ADE provided professional development workshops from October 2 through October 13, 2000 regarding , ''The Write Stuff: Curriculum Frameworks, Content Standards and Item Development.\" Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation provided the training . Representatives from each district were provided the opportunity to select a team of educators from each school within the district to participate. The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems by video conference for Special Education and LEP Teachers on November 17, 2000. Also, Alternative Assessment Portfolio System Training was provided for testing coordinators through teleconference broadcast on November 27, 2000. 56 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) On December 12, 2000, the ADE provided training for Test Coordinators on end of course assessments in Geometry and Algebra I Pilot examination. Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation conducted the professional development at the Arkansas Teacher Retirement Building. The ADE presented a one-day training session with Dr. Cecil Reynolds on the Behavior Assessment for Children (BASC). This took place on December 7, 2000 at the NLRSD Administrative Annex. Dr. Reynolds is a practicing clinical psychologist. He is also a professor at Texas A \u0026amp; M University and a nationally known author. In the training, Dr. Reynolds addressed the following: 1) how to use and interpret information obtained on the direct observation form, 2) how to use th is information for programming, 3) when to use the BASC, 4) when to refer for more or additional testing or evaluation, 5) who should complete the forms and when, (i.e., parents, teachers, students), 6) how to correctly interpret scores. This training was intended to especially benefit School Psychology Specialists, psychologists, psychological examiners, educational examiners and counselors. During January 22-26, 2001 the ADE presented the ACT AAP Intermediate (Grade 6) Benchmark Professional Development Workshop on Item Writing . Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation provided the training. Representatives from each district were invited to attend. On January 12, 2001 the ADE presented test administrators training for mid-year End of Course (Pilot) Algebra I and Geometry exams. This was provided for schools with block scheduling. On January 13, 2001 the ADE presented SmartScience Lessons and worked with teachers to produce curriculum. This was shared with eight Master Teachers. The SmartScience Lessons were developed by the Arkansas Science Teachers Association in conjunction with the Wilbur Mills Educational Cooperative under an Eisenhower grant provided by the ADE. The purpose of SmartScience is to provide K-6 teachers with activity-oriented science lessons that incorporate reading, writing, and mathematics skills. The following training has been provided for educators in the three districts in Pulaski County by the Division of Special Education at the ADE since January 2000: On January 6, 2000, training was conducted for the Shannon Hills Pre-school Program, entitled \"Things you can do at home to support your child's learning .\" This was presented by Don Boyd - ASERC and Shelley Weir. The school's director and seven parents attended. 57 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 30, 2008 (Continued) On March 8, 2000, training was conducted for the Southwest Middle School in Little Rock, on ADD. Six people attended the training. There was follow-up training on Learning and Reading Styles on March 26. This was presented by Don Boyd - ASERC and Shelley Weir. On September 7, 2000, Autism and Classroom Accommodations for the LRSD at Chicot Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Karen Sabo, Kindergarten Teacher\nMelissa Gleason, Paraprofessional\nCurtis Mayfield, P.E. Teacher\nLis\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_431","title":"Election zone","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1992/1994"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","School boards","Educational law and legislation","Elections"],"dcterms_title":["Election zone"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/431"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nRECEIVED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION AUG 3 1592 Office of Desegregation Monitoring DALE CHARLES, ROBERT L. BROWN, SR., GWEN HEVEY JACKSON, DIANE DAVIS, and RAYMOND FRAZIER PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-92-476 O.G. JACOVELLI, Individually and As President of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District, PATRICIA GEE, DR. GEORGE CANNON, JOHN MOORE, DORSEY JACKSON, DR'. 'KATHERINE MITCHELL and W.D. \"BILL\" HAMILTON, Individually and In Their Official Capacities as Members of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District, A Public Body, Individually and In Their Official Capacities and THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, A Public Body Corporate DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS For their motion, defendants O.G. Jacovelli, Patricia Gee, Dr. George Cannon, John Moore, Dorsey Jackson, Dr. Katherine Mitchell, W.D. \"Bill\" Hamilton and the Little Rock School District (LRSD) state: 1. The stated purpose of this lawsuit is to create new zones from which members of the LRSD Board of Education will be elected \"in accordance with the 'one man one vote' principle and the principles of the Voting Rights Act\". These defendants, however. have no duty and no authority to establish or to reform the boundaries of the zones from which LRSD board members are elected. 'ChMiIcn.MTDThe complaint does not allege that these defendants had a duty or the authority to reform the election zones. 2 . LRSD has an average daily attendance in excess of twenty- four thousand students. Under Arkansas law, it is the duty of the county board of education of each county encompassing a district the size of LRSD to \"divide that school district into zones for the purpose of electing members to that school district's board of directors.\" Ark. Code Ann. 6-13-607. 3 . The present LRSD election zones were established by court order in Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, Case No. LR-C-82-866, on December 18, 1986. The plaintiffs should not be allowed to maintain a suit against these defendants which is premised upon defendants' compliance with the December 18, 1986 order of the district court. 4 . In order to resolve all issues concerning the election zones in LRSD expeditiously and in the proper forum, LRSD has filed in Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District. LR-C-82-866, concurrently with this motion. a motion asking the court to modify its December 18, 1986 order by either relinquishing jurisdiction of this issue so that the Board of Education of Pulaski County can establish appropriate election zones or by establishing a schedule pursuant to which the parties in that case can resolve the issue of appropriate election zones. 5. Both plaintiffs' counsel and the lead plaintiff in this case are also involved in Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District. LR-C-82-866 and therefore know or kihy\\Charle.MTD 2should know that the present election zones have been established by court order in that prior pending case. Further, an investigation of the facts and the law prior to the filing of this lawsuit would have shown that these defendants are not responsible for redistricting the election zones within LRSD. Plaintiffs have failed to state a claim for which relief can be granted against these defendants and have raised issues which are controlled by a district court order in a prior pending lawsuit. WHEREFORE, for the reason^ set out above, the defendants pray . J \" - for an order dismissing this case with prejudice and for all other proper relief. Respectfully submitted, ( , , O.G. Jacovelli, Patricia Gee, Dr. George Cannon, John Moore, Dorsey Mitchell, Jackson, W.D. Dr. \"Bill Little Rock School District Katherine Hamilton, FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Street Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 By: Christopher Helle Bar No. 81083 tCHLby t tea. MT D 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion to Dismiss has been served on John W. Walker, JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. , 1723 Broadway, Little Rock, AR 72201 by depositing copy of same in the United States mail on this 31st day of July, 1992. --------------- .ristopher Heller / ) !. iaihyXChsrlca.MTO 4U 1 'W '5\nV 5X0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION AUS 3 1992 Office of Desegregation Moniioriuo DALE CHARLES, ROBERT L. BROWN, SR., GWEN HEVEY JACKSON, DIANE DAVIS, and RAYMOND FRAZIER PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-92-476 O.G. JACOVELLI, Individually and As President of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District, PATRICIA GEE, DR. GEORGE CANNON, JOHN MOORE, DORSEY JACKSON, DR,'.-KATHERINE MITCHELL and W.D. \"BILL\" HAMILTON-, Individually and In Their Official Capacities as Members of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District, A Public Body, Individually and In Their Official Capacities and THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, A Public Body Corporate DEFENDANTS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS The plaintiffs in this case are African-American residents of the Little Rock School District. The defendants are the Little Rock School District and the members of the Board of Education the Little Rock School District. The stated purpose of this lawsuit is to create new zones from which members of the LRSD Board of Education will be elected \"in accordance with the 'one man - one vote' principle and the principles of the Voting Rights Act.\" Complaint, p. 5. These defendants, however, have no duty and no authority to establish or to reform the boundaries of the zones from which the LRSD board members are elected. The complaint does lui(hy\\Chr\u0026gt;Bri.MTDnot allege that these defendants have the duty or the authority to reform the election zones. The present LRSD election zones were established by district court order in Little Rock School District V. Pulaski County Special School District. Case No. LR-C-82-866, on December 18, 1986 . That case remains pending in the Eastern District of Arkansas. A copy of the Order which established the present LRSD election zones is attached to this brief as Exhibit A. LRSD has an average daily^attendance in excess of twenty-four thousand students. Under Arkansas law, it is the duty of the county board of education of each county encompassing a district with more than twenty-four thousand students to \"divide that school district into zones for the purpose of electing members to that school district's board of directors.\" Ark. Coc^e Ann. 6-13-607. The complaint does not allege that any elections in LRSD have been conducted in violation of the district court order which established the election zones. Even if the issue of LRSD election zones were not controlled by a district court order in a prior pending case, the responsibility for establishing election zones would rest with the Board of Education of Pulaski County and not with the Little Rock School District or the members of its board of directors. These defendants cannot be held responsible for failing to revise election zones which they had no responsibility to revise. McGruder v. Phillips County Election Com'n.. 850 F.2d 406, 410 (Sth Cir. 1988). laihy\\Char-Bri.MTD 2Both plaintiffs' counsel and the lead plaintiff in this case are also involved in Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District. Case No. LR-C-82-866 and therefore know or should know that the present election zones have been established by court order in that prior pending case. See Exhibit B to this brief. This lawsuit is unnecessary and frivolous, it raises only issues that are controlled by a court order in a prior pending case, and it states no claim for which relief can be granted against these defendants. It should be dismissed with prejudice. Respectfully submitted. O.G. Jacovelli, Patricia Gee, Dr. George Cannon, John Moore, Dorsey Mitchell, Jackson, W.D. Dr. \"Bill\" Little Rock School District Katherine Hamilton, FRIDAY, ELDREDGE CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Street Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 By: _________ Shristopher Heller Bar No. 81083 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss has been served on John W. WWaallkkeerr,, JOHN W. WALKER, P.A., 1723 Broadway, Little Rock, AR 72201 by depositing copy of same in the United States mail on this 31st, day of July, 1992. Christopher Hell'^r kaihy \\Char* B ri. MTD 3 'i 'i c^Z2 KxiU '} if IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION AUG 3 1992 Cilice of Dessj.'ogation f,\n! IQ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL DEFENDANTS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS MOTION TO POSTPONE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD ELECTION AND TO REFORM LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ELECTION ZONES For its motion, the Little Rock School District (LRSD) states: 1. The present LRSD election zones were established by this court on December 18, 1986. The order which established the U a '1 \u0026gt; present zones is attached as Exhibit A to this motion. 2. The LRSD election zones should be reformed on the basis of 1990 census information so that each zone contains a relatively equal population and in a way that does not abridge or deny the right of minorities to vote. 3 . LRSD has an average daily attendance in excess of twenty- four thousand students. Under Arkansas law, the responsibility to divide LRSD into zones for the purpose of electing members to the taihylLRiOVPCSSD.MTPLRSD Board of Education rests with the County Board of Education of Pulaski County. Ark. Code Ann. 6-13-607. 4. The election zones were originally established by this court, but there are no findings in this case concerning any voting rights violations within LRSD. The election zones are not a part of any desegregation plan and the settlement agreement contains no particular requirements concerning election zones. There is no reason that responsibility for redrawing the zones should not now be relinquished to the Board of- Education for Pulaski County pursuant to Arkansas law. 5. In the alternative, the court should establish a schedule for resolution of the LRSD election zone issue in this case. 6. The deadline for filing as a candidate for a position on the LRSD Board of Education is July 31, 1992. The court should therefore order an extension of the filing period and any necessary postponement of the LRSD school board election so that school board members can be elected from zones which have been appropriately adjusted in response to the 1990 census. WHEREFORE, for the reasons set out above, LRSD prays for an order relinquishing responsibility for redrawing the LRSD election zones to the Board of Education for Pulaski County, for any necessary extension of the filing period and postponement of the election so that the next school board election can be conducted 2 k*ihy\\LK5DVPCSSD.MTPwith appropriately adjusted election zones, and for all other proper relief. Respectfully submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Street Little Rock, AR 72201 7(501) 376-2011 By:' _ Christopher Heller Bar No. 81083 kihy\\LR5DVPC3SD.MTP 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion to Postpone Little Rock School District School Board Election and to Reform Little Rock School District Election Zones has been served on the following by depositing copy of same in the United states mail on this 31st, day of July, 1992: Mr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 zJ. Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell #15 Hickory Creek Drive Little Rock, AR 72212 Ms. Ann Brown Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Chri^opher Helled kuhyvUUOVKSSD.MTP 4 07/29/92 13:45 URIGHT,LINDSEY\u0026gt;JEN 501/376-9442 NO. 464 R00i I little vs. EXHIBIT A Filed THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR^ EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION IN THE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. LR-C-82-866 COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL PULASKI --- district no. 1, et al MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al - ORDER Pursuant to the directions of conference Board tion U* OIITWCT COURT OSTCRN OHTRtCT ARMARlAt n\n..',K':=96 carc r. brents, cleric By: PLAINT 3?B^ defendants INTERVENORS the court at the pre-Trial of December 9. 1986 the Little of Directors adopted a I i SSi I I I Rock ^school District proposal for the March, 1987 elec- of school board members. Pursuant to the proposal adopted I by the Little Rock School District Board of Directors, the following order is hereby entered: I I 1. The Little Rock School District at the Juno, 1986 I hearing proposed dividing the district into seven (7) school board election zones with the following populations and black compositions: Zone 1 - 25,399 total population\n81.50 % black zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6 - 25,295 total population\n- 25,210 total population\n- 24,844 total population\n- 25,016 total population\n- 25,107 total population\n68.90 % black 7.83 % black 2.96 % black 18.30 % black 17.30 % black Zone 7 - 25,043 total population\n14.10 black 2. The Court finds that the seven (7) contiguous xonas07/29/92 13:45 UR IGHT.LINDSEY,JEN 501/576-9442 NC. 464 6005 I with comparable populations comports with the pr l^iple required by the constitution. one-man onevote that the Little Rock School Distri The Court further find^ compliance with the mandate of Cts redistricting plans are 'in Act (codified amended 52 of the Voting Rights 42 U.S.C .51973) and does the right of minorities not abridge or deny ' to vote. 3. It is also the intention of I allow incumbents to the election plan to serve the -fetnainder of thei r terms. for that purpose to be In order the seven (7) 4. realized it will be zone election plan. Zone Four (4) residing within the zone. election in March, 1987. necessary to phase ip presently has four (4) incumbents Two of the incumbents will be up for i These two incumbents will gible to run for re-election. not be eli5. In March, 1987, Zones One (1) and Six (6) will be combined for the purpose of electing one school board member to the Little Rock School District Board of Directors. 6. In March, 1987, Zones Five (5) and Seven combined for the (7) will be the Little Rock : purpose of electing one school board School District Board of Directors. member to 7, In March, 1988, the third incumbent Four (4) will be up for election. residing in Zone This incumbent will eligible to not be I 8. run for re-election in March, 1988. Zone Two (2) presently has two (2) incumbents residing within the zone. One of the incumbents will be election in March, 1988. up for This incumbent for re-election in March, 1988. will not eligible to I ru:| 9. Zone Three (3) presently has one (1) incumbent I I i07/29/92 13:46 URIGHT.LINDSEY.JEN 501/376-9442 NO. 464 P004 I ! I i residing within the zone. The incumbent's terra will expire in March, 1988. I' -Ti The incumbent will be eligible to run for eleJtion because re- no other incumbent presently resides in thi a zone. 10. In March of 1988, whichever zone between the two combined zones of one (1) and six (6) and five (5) and did not elect a school board member, seven {7\u0026gt; an election will be held I in that zone at this time. In other words, if the March, 1987 election provides representative from Zone One (1) an election will be held in Zone six (6) in March, 1988. If the March, 1987 election provides representation from Zone Five (5) an election will be held in Zone Seven (7) in March, 1988. By March, 1988 all seven zones will have duly elected representatives. In March, 1989 the terms of the incumbents in Zones Two (2) and Fou .r (4) will expire. The incumbents will be eligible to run for reelection since no other incumbent will reside in those zones. 11. The board member elected from a particular zone must reside within that zone\nonly the electors within a zone will be eligible to vote for candidates from that zone. 12. Howard Dieraer, the Pulaski county elections coordinator, and the. Pulaski County election commission are directed to implement the necessary voting maps, ballots and other necessary steps to insure the election of school board members ir the Little Rock School District pursuant to this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED this day of December, 1986. HBHRYz' U.S. District Judge This dccuraent entered on docket sheet in compliance with1* i I I j I I I r 07--31z'92 11:31 UR IGHT.LINDSEY\u0026gt; JEN 501z 376-9442 NO, 4S5 P002 FILED _ (i\u0026gt;a\u0026gt;iMereoHV ::h the united states district could EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION MAIU1989 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CMC O Byf OBW F. II V. NO. LR-C-82-86e PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, NO. 1, ET AL. defendants , MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. INTERVENORS : KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. INTERVENORS STIPULATED AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT The partiei submit the following stipulation for Court approval: The Complai\nbe amended in on filed by the \"Joshua intervenors\" herein der to: f nay 1. Ac I d Marcellus Person, Parent and Next Friend of Ameerah Person, as a party plaintiff. Aneerah Person is a black school child whi J*-----------* -------------------------s-i. a is eligible to attend and who attends the public ' iMmw MtiiHcr I I t J I I I schools of the lulaski County Special School District, defendant herein. The parties further stipulate that Marcellus Person, j I parent and next friend of Aneerah Person, may adopt by reference i all allegations Intervenors\"\nan heretofore made in this proceeding by the \"Joshua j d I I 2. Substitute Dale Charles for Reverend Robert Willingham as Pn al Association li esident of the Little Rock Chapter of the Nation- ! or the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). I EXHIBIT BI 1 I ) 07/29/92 13:45 UR IGHT,LINDSEY,JEN 501/376-9442 Nu. 464 P002 little V3 . . EXHIBIT A FiLtD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION COUR?' UA. OHTWCT eOMWT OlTWeT R-o tf.'sses carl r. brents, clerk By\ni i i CT ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. LR-C-82-866 PLAINTIVE'\"*\" ! I I COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL PULASKI --- DISTRICT NO. 1, et al DEFENDANTS I MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al 1 INTERVENORS Pursuant conference ORDER to the directions of December 9, 1986, the of the court at the Pre-Trial Little Rock^school District Board of Directors adopted a proposal for the March, 1987 election of school board members. Pursuant to the proposal adopted I by the Little Rock School District Board of Directors, the following Order is hereby entered: 1. The Little Rock School District at the June, 1986 I hearing proposed dividing the district into seven (7) school board election rones with the following populations and black compositions: Zone 1 - 25,399 total population\n81.50 % black zone 2 - 25,295 total population\n68.90 t black Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 zone 6 - 25,210 total population\n- 24,844 total population\n- 25,016 total population\n- 25,107 total population\n7.83 % black 2.96 % black 18.30 black 17.30 % black Zone 7 - 25,043 total population\n14.10 % black 2. The court finds that the seven (7) contiguous zones07/29/92 13: 45 UR IGHT.LINDSEY.JEN 501/376-9442 NG, 454 r00j I with comparable populations comports with the pr H^iple required by the one-man onevote constitution. that the Little Rock School The Court further findls compliance with the mandate of amended 52 of District's redistricting plans are in Act (codified the Voting Rights 42 U.S.C .51973) and does the right of minorities to ,vote. not abridge or deny i 3. It is also the intention allow incumbents to of the election plan to i serve the -remainder of thei for that purpose to be r terms. In order the seven (7) 4. realized it will be zone election plan. Zone Four (4) residing within the zone lotion in March, 1987, gible to\" run for S. t necessary to phase in presently has four (4) incumbents . Two of the incumbei^ts will be up for These two incumbents will not be elire- election. In March, 1987, Zones One (1) and Six combined for the (6) will be purpose of electing one the Little Rock School school board member to 6. District Board of Directo ra, In March, 1987, Zones Five (5) and Seven combined for the (7) will be the Little Rock purpose of electing one school board member to 7, School District Board of Directors. In March, 1988, the third incumbent Four (4) will be up for election. residing in Zone This incumbent will eligible to not be 8. run for re-election in March, 1988. Zone Two (2) presently has two (2) incumbents residing within the zone. One of the incumbents will be election in March, 1988. for re-election in March, This incumbent 1988. 9. Zone Throe (3) up for will not eligible to run Pr..enny one ,1, icu.b.nt 07/29/92 13:46 UR IGHT,L1NDSEY.JEN 501/376-9442 NO. 464 P004 I t i residing within the zone. The incumbent's term will expire in March, 1988. I' -Ti The incumbent will be eligible to elec/tion because no zone. 10. run for re- I I I other incumbent presently resides in thia In Maren of 1988, whichever zone between the two combined zones of did not elect a school board member. one (1) and six (g) and five (5) and seven (7) an election will be held i in that zone at this time. election provides In other words, if the March. 1987 representative from Zone One (1) an election will be held in Zone six (6) in March, 1988. If the March, 1987 election provides representation from Zone Five (5) an election will be held in Zone Seven all seven zones will have . (7) in March, 1988. By March, 1988 ves. In March, 1989 the terms of the incumbents in Zones Two (2) and Pour (4) will expire, election since no The incumbents will be eligibl other incumbent will reside in e to run for re- those zones. 11. The board member elected from a particular zone must reside within that zone\nonly the electors within a zona will be eligible to vote for candidates from that zone. 12. Howard Dieraer, the Pulaski county elections coordinator, and the. Pulaski County election commission are directed to implement the necessary voting maps, ballots and other necessary steps to insure the election of school board members ir the Little Rock School District pursuant to this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED this day of December, 1986. HfiNRy, U.S. District Judge This dccuraent entered on docket sheet In compliance with / J Zif/// iiRECEIVED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OP ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION AUG 2 1993 Office of Desegregation Moniioring LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. INTERVENORS DALE CHARLES, ET AL. V. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. MOTION REQUESTING SEPARATE ENTRY OP JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO RULES 54(B) AND 58, FED.R.CIV.P., ON CLAIMS THAT WERE SUBJECT TO THE ORDER OF THE COURT ENTERED ON JUNE 21, 1993 Come the Charles Plaintiffs/Intervenors by and through their undersigned counsel, and move the Court to make \"an express determination that there is no just reason for delay\" in having a final judgment entered in this case regarding the statutory and constitutional voting rights claims which were the subject of tho Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order entered on June 21, 1993. Plaintiffs herewith submit a brief more fully explaining the need for such an Order and Judgment. Respectfully submitted, ,1 Mark Burnette, Bar# 88078 JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 S. Broadway Little Rock, Ar. 72205 (501) 374-3758 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed, postage,pre-paid, by regular mail, to all opposing counsel this -^O day of . k i (' \u0026lt;__________/ 1993. Mark Burnette, Bar # 880781^ECEED AUG 2 1V93 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION Office of Desegregation Monitoring LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. INTERVENORS DALE CHARLES, ET AL. V. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION REQUESTING SEPARATE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO RULES 54(B) AND 58, FED.R.CIV.P., ON CLAIMS THAT WERE SUBJECT TO THE ORDER OF THE COURT ENTERED ON JUNE 21, 1993 On June 21, 1993, the Court filed a document entitled \"Memorandum Opinion and Order\" which recited the pleadings and claims of the Charles Plaintiffs, and went on to set out findings of fact and conclusions of law in compliance with Rule 52(a), FRCP, regarding the \"Charles\" Plaintiffs/Intervenors constitutional and statutory voting rights claims. The clerk of the court marked that Mem. Op. and Order as being \"entered on the docket sheet in compliance with Rule 58 and/or 79(a), FRCP. II The I single entry on the docket of that Mem. Op. and Order does not. however, comply with the \"Separate Document\" requirement of Rule 58. See St. Marv's Health Center v. Bowen. 821 F.2d 493, 496 (Sth Cir. 1987)(stating the separate document requirement)\nands^, Moore v. Warwick Public School Dist., 794 F.2d 322, 325 n.1 (Sth Cir. 1986)(\"We previously have stressed to the district judges that the rule is mandatory and is more than a mere formality in that it plays an important role in making a judgment final for purposes of determining when the time for filing ppst- judgment motions or notice of appeal starts to_run Id. (emphasis added)(citations ommitted). Clearly, the single Order entered by the clerk does not constitute a judgment, and does not constitute compliance with Rule 58, 1 although it does comply with Rule 79(a). Entry of a \"Judgment\" is made pursuant to Rule 58. The first sentence in Rule 58 states however that it is \"Subject to the provisions of Rule 54(b).\" The treatment of the June 21, 1993 Mem. Op. and Order is controlled by the language of Rule 54(b). This action was consolidated by the court with LRSD v. PCSSD on motion by the LRSD plaintiffs. The Court had previously made findings on voting rights issues involved in the case prior to the Charles plaintiffs entry into the case, and may well enter further orders on this issue pursuant to its continuing 1 Charles plaintiffs also point out that the Courtis June 21, 1993 Mem. Op. and Order does not comply with the definition * \"Judgment\" because it includes a and form requirements of a recital of of the claims and is not a final appealable order. II Judgment 11 as used in these rules includes a decree and any order from which an appeal lies. A judgment shall not contain a recital of the pleadings, a report of a master. or the record of prior proceedings. 11 Rule 54(a), FRCP\nand see. St. Marv's Health Center v. Bowen, 821 F.2d 493, 497 (Sth Cir. 1987).jurisdiction. This case is ongoing and the court has certainly not lost jurisdiction over these parties based upon one order issued on June 21, 1993. If that were the case, this Court would have long lost jurisdiction based upon other similarly entered Orders filed and stamped by clerk with the identical language i.e. \"this document entered in compliance with Rule 58 and/or 79(a). II Because the Court clearly has continuing jurisdiction in this case, Rule 54(b) imposes another requirement before an Order which deals with one issue or issues becomes a final appealable order\nspecifically: When more than one claim for relief is presented in an action ... or when multiple parties are involved ... the court may direct the entry of final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay and upon an express direction for the entry of judgment^ In the absence of such determination and direction, an order or other form of decision, however designated which adjudicates fewer than all the claims or rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties shall not terminate the action as to any of the claims or parties and the order or other form of decision is subject to revision at any time before the entry of judgment adjudicating all the claims and the rights and liabilities of all the parties. This Court has not ruled on all the rights and liabilities of all of the parties in this consolidated case, and no \"order or other form of decision, however designated. II can make the June 21, 1993 Order a final judgment until the Court makes \"an express determination that there is no just reason for delay and upon an express direction for the entry of judgment.\" This Court has not done that yet. Plaintiffs are now seeking such an \"express determination and direction\" by motion so that the order willbecome an appealable order after entry of Judgment. Reading Rule 58 alone, and thus assuming that the Court's Mem. Op. and Order was an adjudication of all claims as to all parties such that Rule 54(b) were not controlling, then \"the clerk, unless the court otherwise orders, shall prepare, sign. and enter the judgment without awaiting any direction by the court\n\" Rule 58, FRCP. Rule 58 is explicit, and requires that \"Every judgment shall be set forth on a separate document. A judgment is effective only when so set forth and when entered as provided in Rule 79(a).\" The district clerk has not done so in this case. The only document recorded on the clerk's docket sheet is the Court's own Mem. Op. and Order. St. Marvs, supra, and Moore, supra. To fully comply with Rule 58 and 54(b), the Court must further direct the clerk as stated above so that a separate entry of judgment can be entered. Respectfully submitted. M^rk Burnette, Bar# 88078 JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 S. Broadway Little Rock, Ar. 72205 (501) 374-3758 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed, postage pre-paid, by regular mail, to all opposing counsel this 30th day of July, 1993. '/J Mark Burnette, Bar # 88078. n (I n:S' TRICT COUR I i', IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION 1 6 1993\n'a:: :-l ?jT CLERK LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET 2^. ISy: \\J . jYa PLAINTIFFS CHP. CL^ V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. DEFENDANTS HRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. INTERVENORS RECEIVED DALE CHARLES, ET AL. V. 4UG 1 7 WJ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. Office oi Dssegregalion Monitcnng ORDER Defendant, Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\"), has moved for a one week extension of time in which to answer plaintiff's Motion Requesting Separate Entry of Judgment Pursuant to Rule 54 (B) and 58, Fed.R.Civ.P. , on Claims that were Subject to Order of the Court Entered June 21, 1993. Plaintiff has no objection to the Court granting this motion. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that defendant be granted a one week extension of time to answer plaintiff's Motion Requesting Separate Entry of Judgment Pursuant to Rule 54 (B) and 58, Fed.R.Civ.P., on Claims that were Subject to the Order of the Court Entered on June 21, 1993. HONORABLE SUSAN SIGNATURE APPROVED BY: JOHN C. FENDLEY, JR. U' A j THIS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET IN irtMMi lANfc '.vT!-\n\"J' II 1^ c* aNn/OR TWa) FRCP wn\\0orto\\lrW-pcM.er^ ON BY WRIGHT F.Y.I. Date: cs^Ann c/ Bill Boj Connie 53^ Horace Linda Margie Melissa Polly Return to: r TP?.: i! COUrtV IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION 1 6 1993 /'A y: A 5, CLErK LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS CEP. Gt\nX V. NO. LR\u0026lt;-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. INTERVENORS RECEIVED DALE CHARLES, ET AL. V. 4UG I 7 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. Office of DessyreQSuCii L-jni.c-ios ORDER Defendant, Little Rock School District (\"LRSD), has moved for a one week extension of time in which to answer plaintiff's Motion Requesting Separate Entry of Judgment Pursuant to Rule 54 (B) and 58, Fed.R.Civ.P. , on Claims that were Subject to Order of the Court Entered June 21, 1993. Plaintiff has no objection to the Court granting this motion. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that defendant be granted a one week extension of time to answer plaintiff's Motion Requesting Separate Entry of Judgment Pursuant to Rule 54 (B) and 58, Fed.R.Civ.P., on Claims that were Subject to the Order of the Court Entered on June 21, 1993. HONORABLE SSUUSSAANN WEBBER WRIGHT SIGNATURE APPROVED BY\nJOHN C. FEJIULEY, JR. A J rwis DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET IN lANCt: .A/TM n AND/OR 79/Af FRCP ON BY pc wi I AUG-18-92 TUE 15:18 U.S. DIST. CT. LR ARK. FAX NO. 7406096 p.02 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OP ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION CAf?, Sy. 1992 DALE CHARLES, ROBERT L. BROWN, SR., GWEN HEVEY JACKSON, DIANE DAVIS, and RAYMOND FRAZIER PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-92-476 O.G. JACOVELLI, Individually and As President of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District, PATRICIA GEE, DR. GEORGE CANNON, JOHN MOORE, DORSEY JACKSON, DR. KATHERINE MITCHELL and W.D. \"BILL\" HAMILTON, Individually and In Their Official Capacities as Members of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District, A Public Body, Individually and In Their Official Capacities and THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, A Public Body Corporate DEFENDANTS The STIPULATION parties hereto are in agreement that it would be 'Jr\u0026gt;r appropriate to defer the forthcoming school election in the Little Rock School District until a date to be determined by the Court after the Pulaski County Board of Education has been added as a party defendant hereto. The parties hereto are also in agreement that the school zone lines presently in use do not conform to the requirement of the \"one man one vote\" principle and that adjustments to the existing zone lines may be required a as consequence of the new census and demographic changes within the commun'ty. Pursuant to their stipulation, the parties or either of them, shall be expected to move in a timely fashion to add the Pulaski BAUG-18-92 TUE 15:19 U.S, DIST. CT. LR ARK. FAX NO. 7406096 County Board of Education as a party defendant herein. P.03 It is therefore the Order of the Court that the election for school directors for the Little Rock School District be stayed pending further orders of this Court. It is also the order of this court that the current directors remain in their present positions until new elections are held. This stipulation is filed simultaneously in Charles Vj Jacovelli. No. LR-C-92-476 and LRSD v, PCSSD, No. LR-C- 82'866, without prejudice to defendants' position that Charles should be dismissed. UNITED STATES DISTRICT/JUDGE Approved: ^ohh W. Walker JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 (506) 374-3758 THIS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET IN CCOCMMPPLLIIAANNCCEE WWrIIHRULE 58 AND/\u0026lt;------ ON BY '9(aJ FRCP ' .^^r Heller Christopher Heller FRIDAY, ELDREDGE Se CLARK 2000 First Comnercial Bldg. Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 RECEIVED -i X -'5 C'STPiCT cnicr AUG 19 1992 Office of Desegregation Monitoring IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION m fS92 CARJ. 5v: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL DEFENDTkNTS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS STIPULATION The parties hereto are in agreement that it would be ( LERK Cth.-t/'' appropriate to defer the forthcoming school election in the Little Rock School District until a date to be determined by the Court after the Pulaski County Board of Education has been added as a party defendant hereto. The parties hereto are also in agreement that the school zone lines presently in use do not conform to the requirement of the \"one man one vote\" principle and that adjustments to the existing zone lines may be required as a consequence of the new census and demographic changes within the community. Pursuant to their stipulation, the parties or either of them. shall be expected to move in a timely fashion to add the Pulaski County Board of Education as a party defendant herein. It is therefore the Order of the Court that the election for school directors for the Little Rock School District be stayed pending lathy\\P'Electkxx.Sd further orders of this Court. It is also the order of this court that the current directors remain in their present positions until new elections are held. This stipulation is filed simultaneously in Charles v. Jacovelli. No. LR-C-92-476 and LRSD v. PC5SD. No. LR-C- 82-866, without prejudice to defendants' position that Charles should be dismissed. UNITED STATES DISTRICT ZTUDGE Approved: Ji J/ Walker IN W. WALKER, P.A. Broadway Little Rock, AR 122Q6 (506) 374-3758 document a ON - c. BY 1 L.-. Christopher Heller FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 ka(l]y\\P-Elect\u0026gt;on.Sd 2 AUG-18-92 TUE 15:18 U.S, DIST. CT. LR ARK, FAX NO, 7406096 P, 02 EAsie, CCU/?r IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION J 71992 dale CHARLES, ROBERT L. BROWN, SR,, GWEN HEVEY JACKSON, DIANE DAVIS, and RAYMOND FRAZIER oep PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-92-476 O.G, JACOVELLI, Individually and As President of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District, PATRICIA GEE, DR. GEORGE CANNON, JOHN MOORE, DORSEY JACKSON, DR. KATHERINE MITCHELL and W.D. \"BILL\" HAMILTON, Individually and In Their Official Capacities as Members of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District, A Public Body, Individually and In Their Official Capacities and THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, A Public Body Corporate DEFENDANTS The STIPULATION parties hereto are in agreement that it would be appropriate to defer the forthcoiaing school election in the Little Rock School District until a date to be determined by the Court after the Pulaski County Board of Education has been added as a party defendant hereto. The parties hereto are also in agreement that the school zone lines presently in use do not conform to the requirement of the \"one man one vote\" principle and that adjustments to the existing zone lines may be required as a consequence of the new census and demographic changes within the community. Pursuant to their stipulation, the parties or either of them, shall be expected to move in a timely fashion to add the PulaskiAUG-18-92 TUE 15:19 U.S, DIST, CT, LR ARK, FAX NO, 7406096 County Board of Education as a party defendant herein. P. 03 It is therefore the Order of the Court that the election for school directors for the Little Rock School District be stayed pending further orders of this Court. It is also the order of this court that the current directors remain in their present positions until new elections are held. This stipulation is filed simultaneously in Charles v. Jacovelli. No. IiR-C-92-476 and LRSD v, PCSSD, No. LR-C- 82-866, without prejudice to defendants' position that Charles should be dismissed. UNITED STATES DISTRICT/JUDGE Approved: John W. Walker JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 (506) 374-3758 THIS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET IN COMPLIANCE W1 RULE 58 AND/(------ ON BY :9(a) FRCP Chri' stoph .eirx HHeelllleerr FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Conaaercial Bldg. Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 AUG-18-92 TUE 15:18 U.S. DIST. CT. LR ARK. FAX NO. 7406096 P.02 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS \u0026gt;IS. WESTERN DIVISION CAR, Hy- DALE CHARLES, ROBERT L. BROWN, SR., GWEN HEVEY JACKSON, DIANE DAVIS, and RAYMOND FRAZIER PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-92-476 O.G. JACOVELLI, Individually and As President of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District, PATRICIA GEE, DR. GEORGE CANNON, JOHN MOORE, DORSEY JACKSON, DR. KATHERINE MITCHELL and W.D. \"BILL\" HAMILTON, Individually and In Their Official Capacities as Members of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District, A Public Body, Individually and In Their Official Capacities and THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, A Public Body Corporate DEFENDANTS The STIPULATION parties hereto are in agreement that it would be appropriate to defer the forthcoming school election in the Little Rock School District until a date to be determined by the Court after the Pulaski County Board of Education has been added as a party defendant hereto. The parties hereto are also in agreement that the school zone lines presently in use do not conform to the requirement of the \"one man one vote\" principle and that adjustments to the existing zone lines may be required as a consequence of the new census and demographic changes within the community. Pursuant to their stipulation, the parties or either of them, shall be expected to move in a timely fashion to add the PulaskiAUG-18-92 TUE 15:19 U.S. DIST. CT. LR ARK. FAX NO. 7406096 county Board of Education as a party defendant herein. P. 03 It is therefore the Order of the Court that the election for school directors for the Little Rock School District be stayed pending further orders of this Court. It is also the order of this court that the current directors remain in their present positions until new elections are held. This stipulation is filed simultaneously in Charles v, Jacovelli. No. LR-C-92-476 and LRSD v, PCSSD, No. LR-C- 82-866, without prejudice to defendants' position that Charles should be dismissed. UNITED STATES DISTRICT/JUDGE Approved\n^ohh W.Walker JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 (506) 374-3758 THIS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET W COMPLIANCE WIT^ULE 58 AND/Q^9(a) FRCP ON BBYY vV Chri's toph ^err HHeelllleerr FRIDAY, ELDREDGE Se CLARK 2000 First Comaercial Bldg. Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 RECEIVED tUG 2 4 1993 Ottice o! Dssegregaiion Monitoring IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS DALECHARLES, ET AL V. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. RESPONSE TO MOTION REQUESTING SEPARATE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO RULES 54(B) AND 58 FED.R.CIV.P. ON CLAIMS THAT WERE SUBJECT TO THE ORDER OF THE COURT ENTERED ON JUNE 21. 1993 Defendant, Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\"), for its Response to the Charles Plaintiffs/Intervenors' Motion Requesting Separate Entry of Judgment Pursuant to Rules 54(B) and 58 , Fed.R.Civ. P. , on Claims That Were Subject to the Order of the Court Entered June 21, 1993, states: 1. The Charles Plaintiffs/Intervenors have waived any right to request a separate entry of judgment pursuant to Rule 54(B) and 58 by their filing of a Motion to Alter and Amend the Judgment on June 6, 1993 . It is clear from the Court's June 21, 1993 , Order that the Court intended the Order to constitute a final judgment. -1- cvaifcndleyMrud.rtniThe Charles Plaintiffs/Intervenors treated the June 21, 1993, Order as a final judgment in their Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment filed June 6, 1993 . Moreover, in the long history of the litigation between these parties, a separate order of judgment has usually has not been entered, and the parties in earlier appeals have never raised the District Court's failure to enter a separate judgment. 2. The docket sheet for this case indicates that the parties have not before insisted upon separate judgements and have waived the requirement of a separate entry of judgment in prior appeals. WHEREFORE, LRSD prays that the Charles Plaintiffs/Intervenors' Motion Requesting Separate Entry of Judgment Pursuant to Rule 54(B) and 58, Fed.R.Civ.P., On Claims That Were Subject to the Order of the Court Entered June 21, 1993, be denied. Respectfully submitted. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHRISTOPHER HELLER JOHN C. FENDLEY, JR. FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Street Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 By: i^r No. 92182 Iz -2- eva \\fend ley M rad. runCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion has been served the following by depositing copy of same in the United States mail on this , day of August, 1993: on Mr. John W. Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72205 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell 401 W. Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 -3- evaUendfeyUrad.rtm beceiveo ^Ug 2 1993 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ,Office ot Desegregation Monitoring EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS DALECHARLES, ET AL V. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT'S RESPONSE TO THE CHARLES PLAINTIFFS/INTERVENORS' MOTION REQUESTING SEPARATE ENTRY OF JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO RULES 54(B) AND 58 FED.R.CIV.P. ON CLAIMS THAT WERE SUBJECT TO THE ORDER OF THE COURT ENTERED ON JUNE 21, 1993 In Sanders v. Clemco Industries, 862 F.2d 161 (8th Cir. 1988), the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals on facts identical to those in the present case held that the Rule 58 separate document requirement had been waived. In that case, the plaintiff, Terry Wayne Sanders, appealed from orders of the District Court granting summary judgment for Clemco Industries and Ingersoll-Rand Company and denying Sanders motion to reconsider and set aside the summary judgment order. -1- eva\\fendleyMnd2.briThe court in Sanders reached the merits of Sanders' appea1 only with regard to the denial of his motion for reconsideration. The court found the appeal with regard to the order of summary judgment was untimely. Although Sanders had filed his notice of appeal with regard to the summary judgment order within thirty days after the District Court had denied his motion for reconsideration, the motion for reconsideration was filed more than ten days after the order for summary judgment, and therefore, that motion did not toll the deadline for the filing of the notice of appeal of the summary judgment order. Sanders. 862 F. 2d at See Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 59(e) (1993)\nFed.R.App.P. Rule 4(a)(4) (1993)\nSpinar v. South Dakota Board of Regents, 796 F.2d 1060, 1062 (Sth Cir. 1986). In order to preserve his right to appeal the summary judgment order, Sanders had argued that the District Court had never entered a final judgment on a separate document as required by Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and consequently, the time period for filing of a notice of appeal had never begun. The court rejected this argument and determined \"that the parties have waived the separate document requirement.\" Sanders. 862 F.2d at 166. The court identified four factors indicating that the parties waived the separate document requirement during the course of that litigation. One factor was Sanders' motion \"for Reconsideration 164 . and to Set Aside Summary Judgment\" which referred to the District Court's order as \"the court's granting of summary judgment. 11 Likewise in the present case. on June 6, 1993 , the Charles -2- evtifendleyMndZ.briPlaintiffs/Intervenors filed a \"Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment\" referring to the Court's Order entered June 21, 1993. The Charles Plaintiffs/Intervenors in their Brief in Support of the Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment state that \"plaintiffs seek to alter the Judgment\" Brief in Support of Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment, p.l. That the Charles Plaintiffs/Intervenors consider the Court's Order of June 21, 1993, to constitute a final judgment is further evidenced by the fact they requested to be awarded attorneys' fees as prevailing parties based on the Court's Order. See, Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment, p.4. Next, the court in Sanders stated that the trial court's consideration of its summary judgment order as a final judgment provided further support to the conclusion that the parties had waived the separate document requirement. In the present case, the final two paragraphs of this Court's June 21, 1993, Order read as follows: The Court finds that the Complaint should be dismissed and that the proposal adopted by PCBE on December 29, 1992 and submitted to the Court in 1983 should be accepted. and is hereby The Court adopts the plan submitted on January 6, 1993, and sets the election which was postponed from September of 1992 to coincide with the annual school election of September 21, 1993, implemented elections. and for orders that that and the future plan be school Order, June 21, 1993 , p.29. This language clearly evidences the Court's intent that its June 21, 1993 Order constitute the final -3- evaMendfeyUrad2.briX resolution of the claims set forth in the Charles Plaintiffs/Intervenors Complaint. The court in Sanders also found it important that the parties in prior appeals had not raised the District Court's failure to enter a separate judgment. Numerous orders of this Court have been appealed without a separate judgment having been entered or requested in accordance with Rule 58. Hence, the past history of this litigation provides further evidence that the Charles . Plaintiffs/Intervenors waived the separate document requirement of Rule 58. The court in Sanders also noted that neither party had raised the question of noncompliance with Rule 58 prior to the appeal being filed. However, this fact should not distinguish the case at hand. The acts constituting a waiver of the Rule 58 separate document requirement were complete prior to the filing of the Charles Plaintiffs/Intervenors' present Motion. The Charles Plaintiffs/Intervenors should not now be allowed to recover rights already waived. The Charles Plaintiffs/Intervenors will undoubtedly emphasize language from Sanders which indicates that a finding of waiver may be inappropriate when the right of appeal may be lost. However, the Eighth Circuit in Sanders responded to this argument as follows: We recognize that if we remanded for the entry of a separate judgment, Sanders could appeal on the merits of the case, not merely on the question of whether the trial judge abused his discretion in denying reconsideration of his -4- cva\\fendlcy\\lrd2.bri4 order. As we have noted, however, when parties have proceeded in a district court and in this court on two occasions memorandum order constituted as though a as final and appealable judgment, and where the appeal is not entirely lost, we should accept appellate jurisdiction to the extent that we can. Sanders. 862 F.2d at 167. Hence, the court in Sanders recognized that by finding that Sanders had waived the Rule 58 separate document requirement he would be unable to appeal the court's summary judgment order. It noted that Sanders' right to appeal was \"not entirely lost\" because he retained the right to appeal the court's denial of his motion for reconsideration. Similarly, the Charles Plaintiffs/Intervenors could appeal this Court's resolution of its Motion to Alter and Amend Judgment should the Court find that they have waived the separate document requirement of Rule 58. Therefore, it is entirely appropriate that the Court conclude that the Rule 58 separate document requirement has been waived by the Charles Plaintiffs/Intervenors. Respectfully submitted. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CHRISTOPHER HELLER JOHN C. FENDLEY, JR. FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Street Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 By: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE -5- ev\\fer)dky\\Jnd2.bn I certify that a copy of the foregoing Brief is Support has been served on the following by depositing copy of same in the United States mail on this day of August, 1993: Mr. John W. Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72205 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell 401 W. Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 L. C. Fendley, Jr. -6- evti\\fendley\\lRd2.bn IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. JUDGMENT h filed CARL R. By: AUG 2^1993 p: I S, CLER NQSKE.ERX DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS The claims of the Charles plaintiffs that the election zones for members of the Little Rock School District Board of Directors violate the Voting Rights Act of 1964 and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution came on for trial before the Court, Honorable Susan Webber Wright, District Judge, presiding. The Court expressly determines that there is no just reason for delay of entry of judgment as to these claims, which are a part of this consolidated case. Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b)\nFed.R.Civ.P. 58. The issues having been duly tried and a decision having been duly rendered pursuant to the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered in this matter on June 21, 1993, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Voting Rights Act claims raised in the complaint filed by the Charles plaintiffs, which was consolidated with the above-styled case, be and are hereby, denied. The Clerk is directed to enter the judgment accordingly. DATED this day of August, 1993. V. UNITED STATES DISTRIOT JJIUDGE THIS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON COMPI ON_^ ULE S Ai EY (OCKET SHEET IN VOR^f^CP 1 9'5 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS ' WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. ORDER ',.3 ^L'G o ^993 Sy:. :p. CLep,^ PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS Before the Court is the Charles plaintiffs' motion to alter or amend the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order of June 21, 1993, and their subsequent motion requesting separate entry of judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) and 58. Defendants have responded to the motions and the Charles' plaintiffs filed a reply to the Little Rock School District's response to their motion to alter or amend. The Court entered its Memorandum Opinion and Order on June 21, 1993, dismissing the Charles plaintiffs' complaint challenging the election zones for the Little Rock School District Board of Directors. The Charles plaintiffs filed a motion to alter or amend on July 6, 1993 but did not serve the defendants until July 9, 1993 . The defendants contend the Charles plaintiffs' motion is untimely according to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e), which requires that such motion must be served not later than 10 days after entry of judgment. The defendants also argue that the motion should be denied on the merits. In reply, the Charles plaintiffs assert the motion is not untimely because no final judgment has been entered. On the same day that they filed their reply to the defendants' response to the motion to alter or amend the judgment, the Charles plaintiffs filed a motion requesting separate entry of judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) and 58. In response, the defendants contend the Charles plaintiffs waived the Rule 58 separate-document requirement. Having considered the motions, responses, and reply. the Court finds that the motion for separate entry of judgment should be granted and the motion to alter or amend should be denied. In support of their argument that the Rule 58 separatedocument requirement was waived, the defendants cite Sanders v. Clemco Industries, 862 F.2d 161 (8th Cir. 1988). In Sanders, the plaintiff appealed from a Memorandum and Order granting summary judgment and an order denying his motion for reconsideration. The appeals court concluded that the parties waived the separatedocument requirement for several reasons. The court noted that neither party raised the issue of non-compliance with Rule 58 and proceeded as if the Memorandum and Order constituted a final judgment. In addition, the court pointed out that the plaintiff labeled his motion as one 11 for reconsideration and to set aside summary judgment\" and referred to the district court's action as \"granting of summary judgment.\" Next, the court stated that the trial court considered the Memorandum and Order as a final judgment when it denied plaintiff's motion to set aside summary judgment. Finally, the court noted that the parties in prior appeals in the -2- case had not raised the district court's failure to enter a separate judgment. In holding the parties waived the separate-document requirement, the Sanders court stated: \"Although we determine that the parties waived the separate-document requirement in this case, we stress that such a determination is not to be made routinely. Waiver may be entirely inappropriate, and the separate-document requirement enforced, when the right to appeal otherwise would be lost. II Sanders, 862 F.2d at 167. Defendants contend this language should not influence the Court's decision whether to enter separate entry of judgment because the Charles plaintiffs could still appeal this Court's resolution of their motion to alter or amend. In this case. No. LR-C-82-866, the Court's orders are typically in the nature of equitable decrees from which the parties may appeal without the entry of judgment pursuant to Rule 58. However, the claims adjudicated in the Charles' complaint address matters that are separate and distinct from those issues about which the Court routinely enters orders, and which the parties almost as routinely appeal, concerning the settlement plans and agreement. The Charles plaintiffs brought their voting rights claims in a separate lawsuit which the Court consolidated with LR- C-82-866. The facts here are not identical to Sanders and the Court cannot find that the parties waived the requirement for a separate document in this instance. The Court therefore determines that the Charles plaintiffs' claims have been adjudicated and that there is no just reason to -3-delay entry of judgment as to these claims. In accordance with Rule 54(b), the motion requesting separate entry of judgment is granted. In their motion to alter or amend judgment, the Charles plaintiffs argue that the Court erred in finding that the plan adopted by the Pulaski County Board of Education did not violate 2 of the Voting Rights Act when viewed in light of the standards set forth in Thornburg v. Gingles, 478 U.S. 30 (1986) or the standards for retrogression set out in Turner v. State of Arkansas, 784 F.Supp. 553 (E.D.Ark. 1991). They contend the PCBE plan is retrogressive because, applying the 65% minority population benchmark for a \"safe\" district, the number of minority districts is reduced from two \"safe\" districts to one. Additionally, the Charles plaintiff argue the Court misapplied the requirements under Thornburg. The Charles plaintiffs also ask the Court to amend its Order and find that they are the prevailing parties on their claim that the 1986 plan violated the one-man one-vote principle. They contend they are the prevailing parties on the other claims as well because as a result of their lawsuit, regardless of the disposition of the motion to amend or alter, they will be better off under the plan approved by the Court because there is less packing and there is a zone established in which they have a stronger impact as well as a clear chance that the zone will become a third majority minority zone in the future. In Hagerman v. Yukon Energy Corp., 839 F.2d 407, 414 (8th Cir. -4-1988), the court cited with approval a Seventh Circuit case which stated\n\"'Motions for reconsideration serve a limited function: to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence. . . . Nor should a motion for reconsideration serve as the occasion to tender new legal theories for the first time.'\" The Court finds that the Charles plaintiffs' motion attempts to re-argue issues already decided by this Court and to raise issues that could have been made at trial. Therefore, it will be denied.* IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Charles plaintiffs' motion for separate entry of judgment [doc. # 1924] is granted. Their motion to amend or alter [doc. # 1885] is hereby denied. DATED this 'day of August, 1993. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JI X.'JMENT c.NTF ON DOCKET SH' M JUDGE W Pi ,1 02^- ON UY ' The Charles plaintiffs may renew their argument that they are the prevailing parties when they submit a motion for attorneys fees. -5-'Ot t \u0026lt; recesved SEP 2 1993 Office of Desegregation Monitoring IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS SEP 0 1 1993 CARL R.BRENTS, CLERK 8z:. R.,BREN7 DlEE PP. .CCLLEERRKlC-LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. INTERVENORS ORDER The Clerk is hereby directed to substitute the attached pages. nos. 20, 23, 24, and 26, for the corresponding pages in the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered in this matter on June 21, 1993 as Document No. 1853. The Court directs this action in order to more appropriately cite Thornburg V. Gingles in subsequent references in the opinion. DATED this day of August, 1993. 1 UNITED STAATTEESS DISTRICT' JJUUEDGE rms DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET kN COMPLIANCE WITH P ON tE AND/OR 79(a) FRCP ev r' W'W.. been elected to public office in the jurisdiction. Gingles, 478 U.S. at 30, 44-45 (1986). Additional factors that in some cases have had probative value as part of plaintiffs' evidence to establish a violation are unresponsiveness on the part of elected officials to the particularized needs of the members of the minority group and whether the policy underlying the state or political subdivision's use of the contested practice is tenuous. Id. at 45. 9. Consideration of the Senate factors in determining whether a violation of 2 exists has been criticized because the factors often take attention away from the real issue. In this regard, the court in Whitfield v. Democratic Party of Arkansas, 686 F.Supp. 1365 (E.D.Ark. 1988), aff'd 902 F.2d 15 (Sth Cir. 1990) wrote: Having reviewed the Senate Report factors and some of the proof relating thereto, the Court must determine whether its positive findings with respect to many of those factors make it more probably true than not true that the challenged runoff provision makes the political processes not tl equally open to participation\" by blacks in that blacks have \"less opportunity than whites to participate in the political process and to elect representatives of their choice. II It should be apparent by now that most of the positive findings with respect to the Senate Report factors have no tendency to prove, or disprove, that proposition. The truth is that focusing on some of those factors serves more as a distraction than a useful tool for evaluating the cause and effect operation of the challenged runoff laws. Id. at 1386-87. See also, Jeffers, 730 F. Supp. at 232 (federal courts have felt the need to make findings concerning the Senate factors whether or not they have any relevance to the issues at hand). An evaluation of the Senate factors adds little to the -20-to give a remedy solely on the latter basis.\" Jeffers, 730 F. Supp. at 237. Therefore, the Charles plaintiffs have not proved that they have less opportunity to participate in the political process under the districting plan adopted by the PCBE. 11. The second element of a Voting Rights Act claim which the Charles plaintiffs have the burden to establish is that they have less opportunity to elect representatives of their choice under the districting scheme adopted by the PCBE than under the 1986 districting plan. The Supreme Court has identified three \"necessary preconditions\" to a finding that a districting scheme impairs minority voters' ability to elect representatives of their choice: First, that [the minority group] is sufficiently large and geographically compact to constitute a majority in a single-member district. 7\" '' - - - If it is not, as would be the case in a substantially integrated district, the multimember form of the district cannot be responsible for minority voters' inability to elect its candidates. Second, the minority group must be able to show that it is politically cohesive, politically cohesive, it If the minority group is not cannot be said that the selection of a multi-member electoral structure thwarts distinctive minority group interests. Third, the minority must be able to demonstrate that the white majority votes sufficiently as a bloc to enable it in the absence of special circumstances, such as a minority candidate running unopposed . . . usually to defeat the minority's preferred candidate. In establishing this last circumstance, the minority group demonstrates that submergence in a white multi-member district impedes its ability to elect representation. representatives of its chosen Gingles, 478 U.S. at 50-51. These \"necessary preconditions\" will -23-be discussed in turn.^ 12. More than mere numerical superiority needs to be considered in determining whether the Charles plaintiffs constitute a sufficient majority in a single-member district to elect representatives of their choice. They must constitute more than a simple majority in order to ensure that they have the opportunity to elect candidates of their choice. As the court explained in Smith v. Clinton, 687 F.Supp. 1361, 1363 (E.D.Ark. 1988)\nA guideline of 65% of total population is frequently used, and is derived by supplementing a simple majority with an additional 5% to offset the fact that minority population tends to be younger than that of whites, 5% for the registration, minorities. well-documented and 5% for pattern low voter of low turnout voter among See also Fletcher v. Golder, 959 F.2d 106, 110 (Sth Cir. 1992). Therefore, the minority group must be sufficiently large and geographically compact that one or more zones with at least 65% minority population may be created. The Charles plaintiffs argue that three majority black districts should be created. The zones they propose, however, all fall below the 65% guideline. The Charles plaintiffs' proposed Zone 1 is 64.7% black, but it encompasses an area of declining black population and has an initial population variance of -4.5%. The other two proposed majority black zones are 61.7% and 64% black. The minority group is apparently not sufficiently large and ^Thc Court follows the Gingles preconditions but notes that Gingles addressed alleged voting rights violations in the context of a multi-member structure. In Growe, supra, the Supreme Court held that the Gingles preconditions apply in challenges to single-member districts. -24-In fact, racial polarization may not be shown where, in six of ten races with a black candidate facing a white candidate head to head, the black candidate won. 14. In general, \"a white bloc vote that normally will defeat the combined strength of minority support plus white 'crossover' votes rises to the level of legally significant white bloc voting.\" Gingles, 478 U.S. at 56. This situation simply does not exist in Little Rock. In 1980, Judge Eisele, after careful review of a voluminous amount of data, concluded that Little Rock does not have racially polarized voting. Leadership Roundtable, supra. This Court also concludes that racially polarized voting does not exist in Little Rock. The Court is mindful of Mr. Lynch's testimony that many factors other than race determine the outcomes of elections. This evidence is relevant to determine whether \"bloc voting by white voters will consistently defeat minority candidates.\" Gingles, 478 U.S. at 100 (O'Connor, J., concurring). It also \"would suggest that another candidate, equally preferred by the minority group. might be able to attract greater white support in future elections.\" Id. The Charles plaintiffs have not set forth proof that other factors usually determinative of political success, i.e. the candidates' platforms and policies, their ability as speakers. their II track records\" in the community. their name recognition, their financial support, were not the factors which attracted white voters. See Jeffers, 730 F. Supp at 246 (Eisele, J., concurring and dissenting). -26-SEP-'3-92 THU 10:44 U.S, DIST. CT, LR ARK, FAX NO, 7406096 P, 02 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT' EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION SE^-1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT by- V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS MOTION TO POSTPONE ELECTION For their motion, the Little Rock School District (LRSD) and the Pulaski County Board of Education (PCBE) state: 1. Members of PCBE are elected both at large and from zones from within the boundaries of the three school districts in Pulaski County, Arkansas. PCBE elections normally coincide with the wc- r (? regularly scheduled school elections each year. 2. The only PCBE election scheduled for 1992 is in Zone 5, a zone situated entirely within the boundaries of LRSD. The regularly scheduled school elections in LRSD have been postponed by the court. The PCBE . Zone 5 election remains scheduled for September 15, 1992. 3. The incumbent in PCBE Zone 5, Mr. E. Grainger Williams, is unopposed for reelection. He will continue to serve Zone 5 whether or not an election is held on September 15, 1992.SEP- 3-92 THU 10:45 U.S. DIST. CT. LR ARK. FAX NO. 7406096 P. 03 4. LRSD will be required to pay the cost of the PCBE Zone 5 election. There will be no significant additional cost to LRSD if the PCBE Zone 5 election is held at the same time as the LRSD Board of Education election. There will be a significant cost to LRSD if the PCBE election is held as scheduled. The PCBE election should be rescheduled to coincide with the LRSD Board of Education election to avoid a waste of money which will be better spent for education and implementation of LRSD's desegregation plan. WHEREFORE, for the reasons set out above, the Little Rock School District and the Pulaski County Board of Education pray for an order postponing the Pulaski County Board of Education Zone S election until the time of the Little Rock School District 1992 Board of Education election. Respectfully submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Street Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 By: Christopher Heller Bar No. 81083 PULASKI county BOARD OF EDUCATION PULASKI COUNTY ATTORNEY Pulaski County Courthouse Little Rock, AR 72201 By: L:a.ra\nr?y Vahght kidyVP-PoiipcBB.Eieciiqa 2 SEP- 3-92 THU 10:45 U.S. DIST. CT. LR ARK. FAX NO. 7406096 P. 04 - \\ I CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion to Postpone Election has been served on the following by depositing copy of same in the united states mail on this 1st day of September, 1992\nMr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell #15 Hickory Creek Drive Little Rock, AR 72212 Ms. Ann Brown Office of Desegregation Monitoring Heritage West Bldg Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 \u0026gt; Christopher Heller 3 F\u0026gt; W.w: V T? C,\"- ii ILse Laan FILED U.S. DISJ-RlCT COURT r .r.n , ni/**! e nu'iMOAe SEP 9 1992 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION SEP 04 1992 CARL R. liritft Office of Desesregation Mcnitoring LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DEW.tlERK INTIFFS V. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE 'fJOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ORDER On motion of the Little Rock School District (LRSD) and the Pulaski County Board of Education (PCBE), and without objection from any of the parties to this action, the PCBE Zone 5 election currently scheduled for September 15, 1992, is hereby postponed until the time of the LRSD 1992 Board of Education election. IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of September, 1992. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET IN :OMPU, ON WITH RULE 58 AND/OR 79(a) FRCP BYRECEIVED RLP.0 SEP 1 0 1992 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT Cj Office of Desegregation Moni'^rjfigTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS SEP 09 1992 im WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. INTERVENORS RESPONSE TO MOTION TO POSTPONE ELECTION The Little Rock School District and the Pulaski County Board of Education have moved to delay the election for Pulaski County School Board Election Zone 5 until such time as the Court determines Little Rock School Board Elections. The Joshua Intervenors have no objections to an Order granting the requested delay herein. Respectfully submitted. JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR (501) 374-3758 72206 Joli: Bar No. 64046 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, John W. Walker, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document has been served upon the following, by placing same in U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, on this 9th day September, 1992: of Christopher Heller, Esq. FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldq. 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Larry Vauqht Pulaski County Attorney Pulaski County Courthouse Little Rock, AR 72201 Sam Jones, Esq. WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Steve Jones, Esq. JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Richard Roachell, Esq. #15 Hickory Creek Drive Little Rock, AR 72212 Ms. Ann Brown Office of Desegregation Monitoring Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 E. Markham St. Little Rock, AR 72201 ohn W. Walker Jobreceived FILED u e oisrnici COURT eastern OISTRIAT ARKANSAS Office OCT 1 1992 of Desegregation Monitofing IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION SEP 24 1992 CARji Ry^ftENTS, CLERK DEP. CLeSt DALE CHARLES, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-92-476 O.G. JACOVELLI, ET AL. DEFENDANTS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. NO. LR-C-82-866V PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. INTERVENORS ORDER Pending in both of the above-named cases are motions to consolidate. The motions are granted. The Clerk is directed to close LR-C-92-476 and to transfer any pleadings that are not duplicates to LR-C-82-866. Any further pleadings in LR-C-92-476 should be filed in LR-C-82-866. 1 On August 18,1992, this Court entered a Stipulated Order in LR-C-92-476, postponing the election for school directors for the Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") until further orders of the Court. The Court also granted the motion of the LRSD and the Pulaski County Board of Education (\"County Board\") to postpone the County Board's Zone 5 election. Upon review of the pleadings filed in both cases concerning the matter of rezoning. the Court The motions to dismiss filed in former Case No. LR-C-92-476 (Doc. HH 3, 11, and 12) arc moot, the case having been consolidated with LR-C-82-866. 0 determines that it is appropriate for the County Board to address the issue of LRSD election zones. By law, the County Board is charged with the responsibility of dividing the LRSD into zones for the purpose of electing members to that District's Board of Directors. Ark. Code Ann. 6-13-607 (Michie 1991). The County Board will determine whether the zones are out of compliance with the \"one mafi* - one vote\" principle, and if they are, will rezone the LRSD accordingly. 3 Should the County Board find it necessary to redraw the zones, the Court asks it to be mindful of LRSD school attendance zones. A IT IS SO ORDERED this / day of September, 1992. UMITOD STATES DISTRICT , JUDGE TMis 00! ON \u0026gt; 1/-C WiTi i Ri 0 ON DOCKET SHENIN 79{a) FRCP BY.______ i: In responseto the LRSDs motion for joinder (Doc. # 1664), the County Board entered an appearancein LR-C-82-866 for the limited purpoic of complying with the orders of this Court to rezone the LRSD. The Court finds this appearance is appropriate and the motion for joinder is granted. in December 1986, the Court approved a proposal adopted by the LRSD dividing the district into seven election zones. Those zones have remained unchanged under the 1986 order of the Court. -2-UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Eastern District of Arkansas Office of the Clerk P.O. Box 869 Little Rock, Arkansas 72203-0869 September 30, 1993 Mr. Michael E. Gans, Clerk United States Court of Appeals 1114 Market Street St, Louis, MO 63103 Case No. LR-C-82-866 Re: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT DISTRICT PULASKI COUNTY vs. Dear Sir: Enclosed please find in duplicate, copies of the following in the above case: Notice of Appeal [certified] Docket Entries [certified] Order filed 8/24/93 Judgment filed 8/24/93 Amended Notice of Appeal Sincerely, Carl R. Brents, Clerk Doris Collins, Deputy Clerk cc: w/encs. All Counsel of Record Lois Lambert-Court ReporterFILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COWF'* district Arkansas EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION ,SFP ? ? 1995 CARL R. BRENTS, CLERK LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL By: PT.ATNTTFFS DEP. CLERK V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHLA, ET AL. INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. INTERVENORS DALE CHARLES, ET AL. V. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. NOTICE OF APPEAL Notice is hereby given that the Plaintiffs and the Joshua Intervenors appeal the Judgment of the Court entered herein on August 24, 1993 to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Respectfully submitted. No. 64046 JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR (501) 374-3758 72206CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing has been mailed. postage prepaid to the counsel of record listed below on this 22nd day of September, 1993. Larry D. Vaught Pulaski County Attorney 201 So. Broadway, Suite 400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Steve Jones, Esq. Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Christopher Heller, Esq. Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 2000 First Commercial Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Sam Jones, Esq. Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 2200 Worthen Bank Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Richard Roachell, Esq. #15 Hickory Creek Drive Little Rock, AR 72212 Ann Brown, Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 210 East Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT UOURT p., EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS' - WESTERN DIVISION ! LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, As next Friend of Minors Leslie Joshua, Stacy Joshua\nSARA MATTHEWS\nAs Next Friend of KHAYYAM DAVIS\nALEXA ARMSTRONG\ntARLOS ARMSTRONG\nALVIN HUDSON\nTATIA HUDSON\nMRS. HILTON TAYLOR, As Next Friend of HILTON TAYLOR, JR., PARSHA TAYLOR and BRIAN TAYLOR\nREV. JOHN M. MILES, As Next Friend of JANICE MILES and DERRICK MILES\nNAACP\nand ROBERT WILLINGHAM, Next Friend of TONYA WILLINGHAM INTERVENORS DALE CHARLES, ROBERT L. BROWN, SR., GWEN HEVEY JACKSON, DIANE DAVIS, and RAYMOND FRAZIER PLAINTIFFS V. O.G. JACOVELLI, Individually and As President of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District, PATRICIA GEE, JOHN RIGGS, III, JOHN MOORE, DORSEY JACKSON, DR. KATHERINE MITCHELL and W.D. \"BILL\" HAMILTON, Individually and In Their Official Capacities as Members of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District, A Public Body, Individually and in their Official Capacities\nTHE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, A Public Body Corporate\nCECIL BAILEY, THOMAS BROUGHTON, DR. GEORGE McCRARY, DR. MARTIN ZOLDESSY, and E. GRAINGER 4 19 8 4 WILLIAMS, Individually and In Their Official Capacities as members of the Pulaski County Board of Education\nand THE PULASKI COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, A Public Corporate DEFENDANTS AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL Notice is hereby given that the Plaintiffs, Dale Charles, et al. and the Joshua Intervenors appeal the Judgment of the Court entered herein on August 24, 1993 to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Appellants will request the transcript from the Court Reporter and make arrangements for payment therefor within five (5) days. z-n Respectful/ly submitted ) John alker Bar No. 64046 jo: 17, . WALKER, P.A. Broadway Little Rock, AR (501) 374-3758 72206 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing has been mailed, postage prepaid to the counsel of record listed below on this ___ day of September, 1993. Larry D. Vaught Pulaski County Attorney 201 So. Broadway, Suite 400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Steve Jones, Esq. Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Christopher Heller, Esq. Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 2000 First Commercial Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Sam Jones, Esq. Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 2200 Worthen Bank Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Richard Roachell, Esq. #15 Hickory Creek Drive Little Rock, AR 72212 Ann Brown, Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 210 East Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Johhnn^z^. Walker COUNTY ATTORNEY COUNT PULASKI Pulaski County ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 201 SOUTH BROADWAY Lime ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 501-377-6285 501-377-6282 FAX RECEfVEo CITIES ALEXANDER CAMMACK VILLAGE JACKSONVILLE LITTLE ROCK MAUMELLE NORTH LITTLE ROCK SHERWOOD WRIGHTSVILLE UNINCORPORATED AREA 600 SQUARE MILES MILITARY BASES LRAFB CAMP ROBINSON October 20, 1993 OCr 2 1 1995 Office of Desegregation c Docket Clerk Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals 1114 Market Street St. Louis, MO 63101 Re: Little Rock School District v. PCSSD Eight Circuit No.: 93-3469 Dear Clerk: Nelwyn Davis and I recently filed f\u0026lt;^on!toring entries of appearance in the above appeal on behalf of the Pulaski County Board of Education, an appellee. We received notice from you that the Board was not listed as an appellee. Since the Board is the body that created the zones that are being attacked, and since we defended them in the District Court, I hereby request that the Pulaski County Board of Education be added as a party appellee and be allowed to participate in the appeal. sincerely, Larry D. Vaught Pulaski County Attorney LDV:sd cc: All Counsel of Record COUNTPULASW CITIES ALEXANDER CAMMACK VILLAGE JACKSONVILLE LITTLEROCK MAUMELLE NORTH LITTLEROCK SHERWOOD WRIGHTSVILLE UNINCORPORATED AREA 600 SOUARE MILES MILITARY BASES LRAFB CAMP ROBINSON Pulaski County COUNH ATTORNEY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 201 SOUTH BROADWAY LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 501-377-6285 501-377-6282 FAX ED October 20, 1993 OCT 2 J 1993 Of'ics of Desi Docket Clerk Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals 1114 Market Street St. Louis, MO 63101 Re: Little Rock School District v. PCSSD Eight Circuit No-: 93-3469 Dear Clerk: Nelwyn Davis and I recently filed Mcnircring entries of appearance in the above appeal on behalf of the Pulaski County Board of Education, an appellee. We received notice from you that the Board was not listed as an appellee. Since the Board is the body that created the zones that are being attacked, and since we defended them in the District Court, I hereby request that the Pulaski County Board of Education be added as a party appellee and be allowed to participate in the appeal. Sincerely, Larry D. Vaught Pulaski County Attorney LDV:sd cc: All Counsel of Record RECEIVED JiN 2 8 1994 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT Office of Desegregation Monitoring NO. 93-3592 PULASKI CTY. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. SPECIAL SCH. DIST. NO. 93-3469 LORENE JOSHUA V. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIST. NO. 93-3594 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIST. V. LORENE JOSHUA APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION THE HON. SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, DISTRICT JUDGE MOTION TO EXPAND PAGE LIMIT FOR APPELLANTS' BRIEF The Appellants Dale Charles, et al., and the Joshua Intervenors, by and through undersigned counsel, for their Motion to Expand the Page Limit for Appellants' Brief, state as follows: 1. Because the three above-referenced appeals have been consolidated, the 50-page limit may be inadequate to permit the Appellants to adequately brief the issues on appeal. 2. A maximum limit of 75 pages would be sufficient. WHEREFORE, Appellants pray that the page limit be increased to / 75 pages. Respectfully submitted. r / / I. DaVid SchoenDAVID SCHOEN, ESQ. P.O. Box 3483 120 West Spring Fayetteville, AR (501) 444-6200 72702 JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR (501) 374-3758 72206 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing has been mailed, postage prepaid to the counsel of record listed below on this day of January, 1994 . Steve Jones, Esq. Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones, 3400 Capitol Towers P.A. Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Christopher Heller, Esq. Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 2000 First Commercial Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Sam Jones, Esq. Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 2200 Worthen Bank Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Richard Roachell, Esq. #15 Hickory Creek Drive Little Rock, AR 72212 Ann Brown, Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 210 East Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 \\) I / I J' --- David SchoenRECEIVIE?D JAW y 8 1994 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT Office of Desegregation Monitoring NO. 93-3592 PULASKI CTY. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SPECIAL SCH. DIST. V. NO. 93-3469 LORENE JOSHUA V. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIST. NO. 93-3594 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIST. JOSHUA V. LORENE APPEAL ] FOR FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION THE HON. SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, DISTRICT JUDGE SECOND MOTION FOR APPELLANTS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THEIR BRIEFS The Appellants Dale Charles, et al., and the Joshua Intervenors, for their Motion for an Extension of Time to File Their Briefs, stated that: 1. The Appellants' Briefs in the above referenced consolidated appeals are due on January 27, 1994 . 2. Due to the press of business in counsels' office. an additional extension of time of two weeks is necessary in which to file the briefs for the Appellants. WHEREFORE, Appellants Dale Charles and the Joshua Intervenors request an extension of time to and through Febiuary 10, Respectfully submitted, 1994.c- ( s. David Schoen DAVID SCHOEN, ESQ. P.O. Box 3483 120 West Spring Fayetteville, AR (501) 444-6200 72702 JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR (501) 374-3758 72206 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing has been mailed, postage prepaid to the counsel of record listed below on this day of January, 1994. Steve Jones, Esq. Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones, 3400 Capitol Towers P.A. Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Christopher Heller, Esq. Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 2000 First Commercial Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Sam Jones, Esq. Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 2200 Worthen Bank Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Richard Roachell, Esq. #15 Hickory Creek Drive Little Rock, AR 72212 Ann Brown, Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 210 East Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 / ( } - David Schoen UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT RECE!VFS| lO. 93-3592 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. FEB 1 1994 PULASKI CTY. SPECIAL SCH. DIST. NO. 93-3469 LORENE JOSHUA V. LITTLE ROCK Office of Desegre^. SCHOOL DIST. iioring NO. 93-3594 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIST. V. LORENE JOSHUA APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION THE HON. SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, DISTRICT JUDGE THIRD MOTION FOR APPELLANTS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THEIR BRIEF The Appellants Dale Charles, et al., and the Joshua Intervenors, for their Motion for an Extension of Time to File Their Brief, stated that: 1. The Appellants' Brief in the above referenced consolidated appeals is due on February 10, 1994. This court has previously granted the appellants two extensions. 2. The Appellants Brief is prepared at the office of John W. Walker, one of the counsel for the appellants. A fire at said counsel's office caused the office to be without heat and electricity for a period of one week, created confusion as to the location of documents, and has necessitated noisy and distracting repairs which continue to the present. Such conditions have substantially interfered with completion of the brief.3. The appellants' brief is substantially completed as of the date of this motion, but additional time is needed to prepare the appendix, and to copy, bind and mail the brief and appendix. WHEREFORE, Appellants Dale Charles and the Joshua Intervenors request an extension of time to and through February 15, Respectfully submitted. 1994. David Schoen DAVID SCHOEN, ESQ. P.O. Box 3483 Fayetteville, AR (501) 444-6200 72702 JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR (501) 374-3758 72206CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing has been mailed. postage prepaid to the counsel of record listed below on this day of February, 1994. Steve Jones, Esq. Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Christopher Heller, Esq. Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 2000 First Commercial Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Sam Jones, Esq. Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 2200 Worthen Bank Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Richard Roachell, Esq. #15 Hickory Creek Drive Little Rock, AR 72212 Ann Brown, Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 210 East Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 J__ David Schoen L Z)ii't'fr-f Clt,t-1~ ^i-lt-f-i IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS RECEIV* No. 93-3592 NO. 93-3469 NO. 93-3594 No. FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT FEB 2 2 1994 Office of Desegregation Mori,iu,...a LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT LORENE JOSHUA V. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. LORENE JOSHUA MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE BRIEF OPT OF TIME For its motion, the Little Rock School District (LRSD) states: 1. The Little Rock School District is an Appellant in Case 93-3592 and an Appellee in the other two of these consolidated cases. 2. LRSD and the Joshua Intervenors both appealed the district court's order of September 27, 1993. LRSD expected to join Joshua's brief in Case No. 93-3592. 3. Upon reviewing Joshua's brief, LRSD determined that its position is somewhat different than that of the Joshua Intervenors and that it would be necessary to file a separate brief. 4 . LRSD has prepared its brief as expeditiously as possible and requests that the clerk file its brief out of time. WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth above, LRSD moves for permission to file the attached brief out of time. Respectfully submitted. FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201(501) 376-2011 Attorneys for Appellants Little Roc: School District B \u0026gt;a: J^topher Heller 4no. 81083 CERTIFICATE T SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion For Permission to File Brief Out of Time been served on the following people by depositing copy of same in the United States mail on this 18th day of February, 1994: Mr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell and Streett First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Elizabeth Boyter Arkansas Dept, of Education 4 State Capitol Mall Little Rock, AR 72201-1071 Chri fer Heller ! IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS No. 93-3592 NO. 93-3469 NO. 93-3594 FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT APR 2 0 1994 Cifioa cf Dcsegr\nC.1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT LORENE JOSHUA V. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. LORENE JOSHUA Appeals From The United States District Court For the Eastern District of Arkansas Western Division Honorable Susan Webber Wright, District Judge BRIEF FOR APPELLEE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT IN NOS. 93-3469 AND 93-3594 Christopher Heller John Clayburn Fendley, Jr. FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 37602911 Attorneys for Little Rock School DistrictTable of Contents Statement Of The Case 1 I. The Voting Rights Act Issue 1 II. The Desegregation Plan Modification Issue 3 Summary Of Argument 11 Argument 13 I. The District Court's Finding That The Charles Plaintiffs Failed To Establish A Violation Of The Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. 1973, Is Not Clearly Erroneous And Should Be Affirmed .............................................. 13 II. The District Court Properly Approved The Closing Of Ish School And The Assignment Of Ish Students To The New And Integrated King Interdistrict School..............................38 Conclusion 50 iR J i=i rXTTJ q IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS No. 93-3592 NO. 93-3469 NO. 93-3594 FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT APR 2 0 1994 Cifico cf Dcsegr .uCil LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT LORENE JOSHUA V. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. LORENE JOSHUA Appeals From The United States District Court For the Eastern District of Arkansas Western Division Honorable Susan Webber Wright, District Judge BRIEF FOR APPELLEE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT IN NOS. 93-3469 AND 93-3594 Christopher Heller John Clayburn Fendley, Jr. FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg, 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 37602911 Attorneys for Little Rock School DistrictTable of Contents Statement Of The Case 1 I. The Voting Rights Act Issue 1 II. The Desegregation Plan Modification Issue 3 Summary Of Argument 11 Argument 13 I. The District Court's Finding That The Charles Plaintiffs Failed To Establish A Violation Of The Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. 1973, Is Not Clearly Erroneous And Should Be Affiraed .............................................. 13 II. The District Court Properly Approved The Closing Of Ish School And The Assignment Of Ish Students To The New And Integrated King Interdistrict School 38 Conclusion 50 1^PH 2 2 'W IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT Oliico oS No. 93-3592 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 93-3469 LORENE JOSHUA V. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 93-3594 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. LORENE JOSHUA MOTION TO RE-OPEN AND TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD Appellees, Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") and Pulaski County Board of Education (\"PCBE\"), for their motion to re-open and supplement the record state\n1. This appeal concerns the alleged violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. 1973 (Supp. 1993). Appellants, the \"Charles Plaintiffs,\" contend that the plan for LRSD election zones adopted by PCBE violates Section 2. A trial was conducted on April 13 and 14, 1993. The district court by Memorandum Opinion and Order dated June 21, 1993, held that the Charles Plaintiffs had failed to establish a violation of Section 2. On August 24, 1993, the district court entered judgment dismissing the Charles Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint from which the Charles Plaintiffs appeal. 2. On September 21, 1993, LRSD elections where conducted under the PCBE plan. In that election, a black candidate was elected from a majority white zone, and a white candidate was elected from a majority black zone. T. Kevin O'Malley, who is white, received a majority of the vote and defeated two black opponents in the LRSD Zone 2 election, and Linda Poindexter, who is black, defeated a white candidate in the LRSD Zone 5 election. Zone 2 is 59.4% black, and Zone 5 is 19.1% black. Certified copies of the election results are attached hereto as Exhibit A. 3. In order to establish a violation of Section 2, a minority group must establish racially polarized voting. Thornburg v. Gingles. 478 U.S. 25, 50-51 (1986). The results of the September 21, 1993, LRSD elections provide further support for the district court's finding that LRSD does not suffer from racially polarized voting. 4. At trial, LRSD entered into evidence without objection by the Charles Plaintiffs certified copies of election results from past LRSD election. WHEREFORE, LRSD and PCBE move that the record in this matter be re-opened and supplemented to include the results from the September 21, 1993, LRSD elections. Respectfully submitted, FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 Attorneys for Appellants Little Rock School District By: Christopher Helle: Bar No. 81083 \u0026lt;CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion to Re-Open and to Supplement the Record has been served on the following people by depositing copy of same in the United States mail on this 20th day of April, 1994: Mr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell and Streett First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Elizabeth Boyter Arkansas Dept, of Education 4 State Capitol Mall Little Rock, AR 72201-1071 Ms. Nelwyn Davis Pulaski County Attorney 201 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Christopher Heller I LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT The Pulaski County Election Commission hearby certifies the Election held in Pulaski County on September 21, 1993, i i } SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER, ZONE 5 \"D C LINDA PONDEXTER 191 \u0026lt;/)O co CZ5 m re JIM GONZALES 160 um 47 STATE OF ARKANSAS COUNTY OF PULASKI cn WE, VAUGHN MCQUARY, MARY LOUISE WILLIAMS AND BECKY TERRIEN, THE PULASKI COUNTY ELECTION COMMISSION, WITHIN AND FOR PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS ON THIS DAY DO FIND AND HEREBY CERTIFY THE ABSTRACT OF VOTES CAST IN THE 1993 ELECTION HELD IN PULASKI COUNTY ON SEPTEMBER 21, 1993 AS SHOWN BY THE ATTACHED RETURNS. WITNESS OUR HANDS AS CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF SAID BOARD THIS 24TH DAY OF s: lER, 1993. CHAIRMA MEMBER ^MfeMl^ER SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME. A NOTARY PUBUC, FOR AND WITHIN THE COUNTY AND OF SEPTEMBER, 1993. zM KES I s ( ! I I X LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FILS 93SEP 30 PM |: 13 The Pulaski County Election Commission heaiby certifies the Election held in PulasH^County^PY COUHTY CLERK on September 21, 1993, PULASKI COUNTY. ARK SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER, ZONE 2 EMMETT WILLIS uO to I 23 T. KEVIN OMALLEY 3'^ DR. ALDA MOORE STATE OF ARKANSAS COUNTY OF PULASKI WE VAUGHN MCQUARY, MARY LOUISE WILLIAMS AND BECKY TERRIEN, THE PULASKI COUNTY ELECTION COMMISSION, WITHIN AND FOR PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS ON THIS DAY DO FIND AND HEREBY CERTIFY THE ABSTRACT OF .\nVOTES CAST IN THE 1993 ELECTION HELD IN PULASKI COUNTY ON SEPTEMBER 21, 1993 AS SHOWN BY THE ATTACHED RETURNS. WITNESS OUR HANDS AS CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF SAID BOARD THIS 24TH DAY OF S\n, 1993. cha: MEMBER o 3:r IMMX 0 MEWB^ SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME, A NOTARY PUBLIC, FOR AND WITHIN THE COUNTY AND AFORESAID, THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1993. PUBLIC, MY COMMISSION E: I 38t LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 '::n ' w J 93 SEP 30 PH n 13 The PulesU County Election Commission hearty certifies the Election held in PulgM Cju^^l^ on September 21, 1993, COUHTY CLERK PULASKI CCJHTY. AR SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER, ZONE 2 EMMETT WILLIS T. KEVIN OMALLEY DR. ALDA MOORE STATE OF ARKANSAS COUNTY OF PULASKI LOUISE WILLIAMS AND BECKY TERRIEN, THE -lire vATTPTiM MCDTIARY MARY LOUISE WILLIAMS AWU uctM , PuaSKI county ELECTioN CO^SSION 7u?akkac nN THIS DAY DO FIND AND HEREBY CERTIFY THE ABSTRACT OF .\nVOTES CAST IN THE 1993 ELECTION HELD IN PULASKI COUNTY ON SEPTEMB 21, 1993 AS SHOWN BY THE ATTACHED RETURNS. :S OUR HANDS AS WITNESS Ab CH? OF SEPTEMK^, 1993. CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF SAID BOARD THIS 24TH 5 chai: MEMBER . \\ , member SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME, A NOTARY PUBLIC, FOR AND WITHIN THE COUNTY AND THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1993. aforesaid, iX^IRES tfflTARY PUBLIC, MY COMMISSION E: 3eo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ..... xsonVwC' \"3 CiViCQ Ct FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 93-3592 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 93-3469 LORENE JOSHUA V. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 93-3594 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. LORENE JOSHUA MOTION TO RE-OPEN AND TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD Appellees, Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") and Pulaski County Board of Education (\"PCBE\"), for their motion to re-open and supplement the record state: 1. This appeal concerns the alleged violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. 1973 (Supp. 1993). Appellants, the \"Charles Plaintiffs,\" contend that the plan for LRSD election zones adopted by PCBE violates Section 2. A trial was conducted on April 13 and 14, 1993. The district court by Memorandum Opinion and Order dated June 21, 1993, held that the Charles Plaintiffs had failed to establish a violation of Section 2. On August 24, 1993, the district court entered judgment dismissing the Charles Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint from which the Charles Plaintiffs appeal. 2. On September 21, 1993, LRSD elections where conducted under the PCBE plan. In that election, a black candidate was elected from a majority white zone, and a white candidate was elected from a majority black zone. T. Kevin O'Malley, who is white, received a majority of the vote and defeated two blackopponents in the LRSD Zone 2 election, and Linda Poindexter, who is black, defeated a white candidate in the LRSD Zone 5 election. Zone 2 is 59.4% black, and Zone 5 is 19.1% black. Certified copies of the election results are attached hereto as Exhibit A. 3. In order to establish a violation of Section 2, a minority group must establish racially polarized voting. Thornburg v. Gingles. 478 U.S. 25, 50-51 (1986). The results of the September 21, 1993, LRSD elections provide further support for the district court's finding that LRSD does not suffer from racially polarized voting. 4. At trial, LRSD entered into evidence without objection by the Charles Plaintiffs certified copies of election results from past LRSD election. WHEREFORE, LRSD and PCBE move that the record in this matter be re-opened and supplemented to include the results from the September 21, 1993, LRSD elections. Respectfully submitted. FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 Attorneys for Appellants Little Rock School District By: Christopher Helle: Bar No. 81083 \u0026lt; CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion to Re-Open and to Supplement the Record has been served on the following people by depositing copy of same in the United States mail on this 20th day of April, 1994: Mr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Roache11 and Streett First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Elizabeth Boyter Arkansas Dept, of Education 4 State Capitol Mall Little Rock, AR 72201-1071 Ms. Nelwyn Davis Pulaski County Attorney 201 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Christopher Heller !/ t LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT The Pulaski County Election Commission hearby certifies the Election held in Pulaski County on September 21, 1993, I I } SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER, ZONE 5 \"D c: LINDA PONDEXTER 191 t/\u0026gt;O xO co GO m TS JIM GONZALES 160 Cot/' u C STATE OF ARKANSAS COUNTY OF PULASKI cn WE, VAUGHN MCQUARY, MARY LOUISE WILLIAMS AND BECKY TERRIEN, THE PULASKI COUNTY ELECTION COMMISSION, WITHIN AND FOR PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS ON THIS DAY DO FIND AND HEREBY CERTIFY THE ABSTRACT OF VOTES CAST IN THE 1993 ELECTION HELD IN PULASKI COUNTY ON SEPTEMBER 21, 1993 AS SHOWN BY THE ATTACHED RETURNS. WITNESS OUR HANDS AS CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF SAID BOARD THIS 24TH DAY OF s: ER, 1993. CH ER SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME, A NOTARY PUBLIC, FOR AND WITHIN THE COUNTY AND .AFORESAID, IN THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1993. j s4 ITARY PUBLIC, MY COMMISSION i/9tr r I The Pulaski County little rock school district PI V 5 n 'r 93 SEP 30 Pf\nH 13 Election Commission hearby certifies the Election held in Pulasla^County[_p on September 21, 1993, COUNTY CLERK PULASKI COUNTY. ARK SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER, ZONE 2 c co co EMMETT WILLIS cn2 T. KEVIN OMALLEY 3^ o I DR. ALDA MOORE STATE OF ARKANSAS COUNTY OF PULASKI czrjco 231-- tm \u0026gt; \u0026gt; cn cn WE VAUGHN MCQUARY, MARY LOUISE WILLIAMS AND BECKY TERRIEN, THE PULASKI COUNTY ELECTION COMMISSION, WITHIN AND FOR PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS ON THIS DAY DO FIND AND HEREBY CERTIFY THE ABSTRACT OF .\nVOTES CAST IN THE 1993 ELECTION HELD IN PULASKI COUNTY ON SEPTEMBER 21, 1993 AS SHOWN BY THE ATTACHED RETURNS. WITNESS OUR HANDS AS CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF SAID BOARD THIS 24TH DAY OF S: ., 1993. cha: MEMBER SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME, A NOTARY PUBLIC, FOR AND WITHIN THE COUNTY AND AFORESAID, THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1993. PUBUC, MY COMMISSIOONN EElXPIRES 7 38 The Pulaski County LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT I? V 1 93 SEP 20 PH H 13 Election Commission hearby certifies the Election held in P^^^^Couji^lEY on September 21, 1993, COUHT-Y CLERK PULASKI COUNTY. AR SCHOOL BOARD MEMBER, ZONE 2 EMMETT WILLIS T. KEVIN OMALLEY r S' DR. ALDA MOORE STATE OF ARKANSAS COUNTY OF PULASKI WE, VAUGHN LOWSE Wn^S^^^ PULASKI COUNTY rT .PmON COMMISSION, WITHIN AND FOR PULASKI COUNTY, day do find and hereby certify the abstract of . ARKANSAS ON THIS 1993 ELECTION HELD IN PULASKI COUNTY ON SEPTEMBER VOTES CAST IN THE 21, 1993 AS SHOWN BY THE ATTACHED RETURNS. S OUR HANDS AS CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF SAID BOARD THIS 24TH cha: septPeEmM: B^, 11999933. .N MEMBER z M:^EfeR SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME, A NOTARY PUBUC, FOR AND ^V^rHIN THE COUNTY AND aforesaid, THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1993. Jbhjjr PUBUC, MY COMMISSION E\niXI^IRES 3 /''A Co/Y Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones, p.a. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3400 TOBY TOWER 425 WEST CAPITOL AVENUE LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 -3472 (501) 375-1 122 TELECOPIER (501) 375-1027 Nashvill* Office *11 Music Circle South Nashville. Tennessee 37203 (615) 259-4664 Telecopier (61S) 259-4668 April 26, 1994 RECEIVED Ms. Mary Loida Deputy Clerk United States Court of Appeal U.S. COURT \u0026amp; CUSTOM HOUSE 1114 Market Street St. Louis, MO 63101 APR 2 8 tW OfJics of Desegregatioi! Moiiiiuiuig\nRE: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, Appeal Nos. 93-3469 and 93-3594 Dear Ms. Loida: In response to your inquiry, neither the North Little Rock School District nor the Pulaski County Special School District intended to enter an appearance as an appellee in the above referenced appeals which involve respectively the election of members of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District (No. 93-3469) and the closing of Ish Elementary School in the LRSD (No. 93-3594). Rather, it was our mutual intent only to enter an appearance and file a brief in Case No. 93-3592 which involves the District Court's order of September 27, 1993 ruling out the old Stephens Elementary School site as a potential location for construction of a new Stephens interdistrict school. Please be advised that I have been authorized by the attorney for the PCSSD, Sam Jones, to communicate to the Court the position of the Pulaski County Special School District. I hope this resolves any confusion regarding the appearance of the PCSSD or NLRSD in the above referenced appeals, please do not hesitate to contact me. If you have any questions. SWJ:le Very truly yours. cc: Sam Jones Christopher Heller John Walker Ann Brown Richard Roachell James Smith Elizabeth Boyter Jerry Malone JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR (501) 374-3758 72206 DAVID SCHOEN, ESQ. 667 Betty Jo Fayetteville, AR (501) 444-6200 72702 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing has been mailed, postage prepaid to the counsel of record listed below on this day of April, 1994. Steve Jones, Esq. JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Christopher Heller, Esq. FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Sam Jones, Esq. WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Richard Roachell, Esq. ROCHELL \u0026amp; STREETT 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Ann Brown, Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 210 East Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 ^rk Burnette M^r' SiLR School Board OKs new election zones As the filing date nears, officials hope redrawn districts will be in place by Sept. 18 BY CHRISTOPHER SPENCER , ' ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE The Little Rock School Board adopted new election zone boundaries Thursday night, but theres some doubt as to whether the new zones will be in place be-i fore the Sept. 18 School Board elections. Were operating on the assumption that this process will be complete, based on what our lawyers have told us, Superintendent Ken James said. Redrawing the districts seven election zones is needed so the zones will mirror the demographic data from the 2000 Census, said Clay Fendley, the school districts attorney. Earlier this week, Sandy Dyer, Pulaski County election coordinator, expressed alarm about changing the election zones so close to the Aug. 6 filing date for candidates. I think it will be a very tight squeeze for us to effect all the changes that would be necessary to accomplish a redistricting project six weeks out from a fullblown [School Board] election, Dyer said Tuesday. James told the board he felt the process would work out. During a School Board meeting Thursday night, board member Baker Kurrus questioned Fendley on the status of the by the adoption of the new zones, change. School district officials plan to We have an upcoming elec- contact the Pulaski County Election, I know because Im running. tion Commission today to discuss Do we anticipate these zones be-ing used for the election? Kur- __ _ rus asked. proved the first of three election The election commission is zone plans prepared by the staff responsible for approval. I dont of Metroplan, a council of local know if they anticipate these governments in central Arkansas, changes, Fendley said. in the plan, population loss in Kurrus is an incumbent board 2one 1 the easternmost zone member running for re-election jg balanced with westward ex-in Zone 4, which encompasses northwest Little Rock. He has become a certified candidate with a petition signed by at least 20 people in his zone, but some of those signatures might be invalidated implementation of the new zones. The board unanimously ap- In pansion. The zone will now take in the Capitol View and Stifft Station neighborhoods. Four of the seven zones will See ZONES, Page 4B Zones Continued from Page IB be comprised of a majority black population with three majority white zones. The current zone boundaries allow for two majority black zones. Arkansas law requires school districts with black or Hispanic populations of 10 percent or greater to have zoned elections. The plan also calls for the Robinwood and Foxcroft neighborhoods, now in Zone 4, to become part of Zone 3, represented by board member Judy Magness. James said after the meeting that it became apparent soon after he took office in mid-June that the rezoning project, initially begun in April, had become stymied somewhere between the School Board administration and the mayors office. We hit the ground running with this, James said. This needs to be done as soon as possible. Information for this article was contributed by Cynthia Howell of the Arkansas Revised Little Rock School Board Election Zones Little Rock School Board has revised the boundaries of its election zones to make the populations in each of the zones approximately equal based on 2000 U.S. Census data. Population has shifted out of east 3 2 7 6 Little Rock, making it necessary to expand the area encompassed in Zone 1, which set off a \\ chain reaction in the other zones. 1 POPULATION ZOIE Tinu PERCENTAGE 1 3 5 1 24,926 25,994 25,715 26,206 WHTE 22.7% 90.2 71.4 41.3 BUCK 75.1 % 6.7 22.3 ,, 53.5 SATURDAY, MARCH 24, 2001 Gamine told to study census data, need to redraw LR election zones BY CYNTHIA HOWELL before the candidate filing dates ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE fop the September 2001 school The release of 2000 Census fig- board election. The filing dead- ures means the Little Rock School line is usually in early August. Board election zones may need Sv The seven Little Rock School Board members are elected solely some adjustments. ____________ School Board members this voters who live in the zone week directed Superintendent Les they are running. Gamine and his staff to review the population numbers in each zone to determine whether the zone boundary lines need to be changed to make the populations in each area about the same. There are no at-large positions on i the Little Rock board. The 1992 Little Rock School Board election was delayed a year and combined with the 1993 election after civil rights lawyer John Walker sued in federal court to Early reports from the census show that there has been an in- -------- ------------- .. crease in population in the west- equalize the populations in the ern part of the city and a decline zones. He also asked in the lawsuit in piirts of the citys core. that the zone boundanes be re- Camine said an effort would be drawn so that three of the zones made to complete the review and would have majority black popula- make any necessary recommenda- t----------------------- tions for changes to the board well ed at the time. tions instead of the two that exist-o CM lf\u0026gt; CM Dyer also noted that the filing deadline for School Board candi- J~ dates is Aug. 6, less than two weeks away, and that the zoning changes could affect who is eligi-oping the boundary proposals. ble to run for two open board seats Walker represented the Nation- in September. ................. ' She said board candidate Bak- Board Continued from Page 1B Joshua intervenors, before devel- Current Little Rock School District election zones tween Markham Street and Kanis the zones had majority-black popRoad. ulations and five were predomi- D al Association (or the Advance- ment of Colored People in a 1992 er Kurrus has already become a lawsuit to force changes in the certified candidate on the basis of boundary lines that existed at the a petition signed by at least 20 peo-time. The NAACP had said the pie in his zone. zones should be redrawn on the The candidacy could become basis of updated 1990 population invalid if the zones change and the figures and should in.c..l.u..d..e.. ..t.h ree petition signers no longer live in majority-black election zones instead of two. Kumis zone, she said. Kumis is an incumbent board The lawsuit, which was ulti- m---e-m---b-e--r- r-u--n--n ing for reelection in mately decided by the Sth U.S. Cir- Zone 4, which encompasses north- -cuit Court of Appeals, resulted in west Little Rock. A' one-year delay in what should -A--c-c--o-r-d--i-n-g- to each of the three ive been the 1992 School Board Metroplan proposals, the Robin-lection. News that the School Board is wood and Foxcroft neighborhoods north of Cantrell Road, now in ^7 The Little Rock School Board is considering changes to current School Board election boundaries so that the population in each of the seven zones will be approximately the same. iJbnsidering zone changes for the Zone 4, would become part of Zone , elec.t.i.o..n.. .a..l.a..r..m...e..d.- S an,d y_ D yer, P_u - J 2one 3 is represented on the 'iaski County election coordinator. V I think it will be a very tight ^ueeze for us to effect ^1 the board by Judy Magness. Arkansas law requires school districts that have black or His- Ranges that would be necessary panic populations of 10 percent or Id accomplish a redistricting pro- greater based on the 2000 Census ject six weeks out from a fullblown [school board] election, to have zoned elections. Those new or redrawn zones were sup-ecutive director, said in a letter to Little Rock Superintendent Ken James last week that east Little Rock has lost population over the past decade. As a result, boundaries for Zone 1 which is the school districts eastern most zone would be expanded westward into the Capitol View or even Stifft Station neighborhoods, setting off a chain reaction of boundary she said Tuesday night posed to be in place by the middle Dyer said neither she nor the of last month. But the law specifi- Pulaski County Election Commis- cally exempts from its require-sion had been approached about ments those school districts such . the possibility of zone changes for as Little Rock that are operating changes tn the other election the election although she believed under federal court desegregation \" \" the Election Commission would orders. have to approve such changes. I Jim McKenzie, Metroplans ex-zones. Zone 2, which encompasses central Little Rock and is repre- Arkansas Democrat-Gazette sented by board member Mike Daugherty, would lose some of its eastern territory to Zone 1. But the western border of Zone 2 would move from Mississippi Street and Boyle Park to Interstate 430 in ail three Metroplan proposals. In two of the three proposals.\nZone 2 would take in the area north of Markham Street and south of Rodney Parham Road all I the way to 1-430. In the third proposal, Zone 2 5 would remain south of Markham Street but extend west to 1-430 be-op \u0026lt;g3 g gc -gS-S si 1 o Ila'S g.-2gg^=l c tfl mOO*35 a Q Ow Cc/j3 O Besides Kurrus Zone 4 seat, nantly white. The demographic Daughertys Zone 2 seat is the only changes occurred over time in board seat up for election this Zones 8 and 7, which are in south year. Daugherty has not yet filed central and southwestern Little with the Pulaski County clerks of- Rock. The other majority-black flee for re-election but has said he - - intends to by the filing deadline. As another example of the changes, the southern border of Zone 5 and the northern border of Zone 7 may be tweaked. In two of the proposals, Zone 5 would take in territory east of Stagecoach Road, almost to Chicot Road, which is contrary to the current zone makeup. zones are 1 and 2. Zones 3,4 and 5 remain predominantly white. The zone populations would range from a low of 24243 to a high of 26,438 depending bn the zone and which of the three plans is selected. Metroplan attempted to balance the populations within an accepted range of plus or minus 5 percent of the average. In each of the three Metroplan The Little Rock district ha.s. .o-p-proposals, four of the seven board erated for about 15 years with a zones would be made up of major- single-member election zone sys-ity black populations and three tent School Board members are would have majority white popula- elected by voters in the zones in tions. When the zones were last re-which they reside. There are no citywide or at-large School Board drawn in the early 1990s, two of positions in Little Rock. 2^ '2.2'2^ I? i.ri.Hri.So 2o *5 (Q g w ojS a i 2 o fl T1 \u0026gt; a \" *9 -n 5 -2 -5 S \u0026lt;3 .. o Ty3 COQ ? MCB b S fl O G fo C3 G W} yoot-' tfl S fi r* . 2*2 .fl zM cii G -\"M S ^11^ g ^9 W flj o o .S2-2$SS-2 s g o 73 g a-s I = is I la \" 0-2 \"S '9 g'-ri'^P g c a SmS -2 - G Q.S 2-5^ y y O 2 d g-G y G fa \u0026gt;,00 S gy 'aoSG'-\nxs-fi o UnagSea OGyu^ C .2g^x3 -Hy.Otz3s onO.gP coiSyooiao wSSisy 430 \u0026gt;\u0026gt;-.4) 'O --.g' 2 2 w S yni bc Sep Q gyj eg \u0026lt;U t- s .2 -\" e ri 9 if\nS \u0026lt;u a\u0026gt; 2 vi ^5 . o U3 5-. o G g U2 cn c fl \u0026lt;u C \"3 rH O 2 - .99 o OJ CO iX33 Xy5 oO. \u0026lt;O.- QOO .S Si 'o,2i Sis y aj5 S u U O-C gro 6^0 2\n2yfMyOyoo5i ri .G-O S - 2 SS-'s y g g.2 jfl\u0026gt;- G rti a o j3 ts .-^95 S 3 Jh U ^=2 S S \u0026lt;u co 2 S X3 O 4} - ri g S ri ffll 2 ..5S3 owt u G I So^So-hsIs- Saigas! I ssi G .Ss 'isS2 uSuT tSn3 'afl j- . Q) CQ g S3 cn -ri Si s a-i CQ o 2 cUo. a3 3S iSG' Cco ? 9? .2 O O M V\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_119","title":"Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2007-07"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Little Rock (Ark.). Office of Desegregation Monitoring","School integration--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Project managers--Implements"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/119"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF Or. T. Kenneth James, Commissioner .Educatilfn 4 State Capitol Mall Little Rock, AR 72201-1071 (501) 682-4475 http://ArkansasEd.org July 31 , 2007 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 -3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1 723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 LittleRock, AR 72201 RECEIVED Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. M. Samuel Jones III AUG -1 2007 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. US. District Court No. 4:82-CV-866 WRW Dear Gentlemen: Per an agreement with the Attorney General's Office, I am filing the Arkansas Department of Education's Project Management Tool for the month of July 2007 in the above-referenced case. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. J~ General Counsel Arkansas Department of Education SS:law cc: Scott Richardson. Attorney Gepera1's Office STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION: Chair: Diane Tatum, Pine Bluff Vice Chair: Randy Lawson, Bentonville Members: Sherry Burrow, Jonesboro Jim Cooper, Melbourne Dr. Calvin King, Marianna Dr. Tim Knight, Arkadelphia Dr. Ben Mays, Clinton MaryJane Rebick, Little Rock , Dr. Naccaman Williams, Springdale An Equal Opportunity Employer UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION REC~PJED AUG -1 2007 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. No. LR-C-82-866 WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of the ADE's Project Management Tool for July 2007. Respectfully Submitted, Arkansas Department of Education #4 Capitol Mall, Room 404-A Little Rock, AR 72201 501-682-4227 I CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Scott Smith, certify that on July 31, 2007, I caused the foregoing document to be served by depositing a copy in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to each of the following: Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1 723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. M. SamuelJones,III Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard 425 West Capitol, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 72201 )1,i(Jdtc, Scott Smith IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION RECEIVED AUG - 1 2007 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL V. QFACEOF PLAINTIFFS DESEGREGA110N MO'.lTiJRI G PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL NO. LR-C-82-866 WRW r DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the AD E's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. - IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 ~~@fiEmf.oribafion:avaJ@ofeat.Jurfe:3P~2JiO:ZtfruraoEca@latem6e1Sffl EB[fill]tiomrauiia1oomrd.\u0026amp;woewzwojecffo~e1ioo1c\naa1ustmeats1 B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 C. Process and distribute State MFPA. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 Pfilune:M:2mm@lsfrIBffiioris\"of]1ate_Eouncatjon Eunaing ior,ES~1l6/0Z,were.as l,oilowS\nJ\nR~$p[g_il6Q8 ~[RSD...,.$35,'47itl2ZD e,c,-:SSD,4$06\n.463:Qz.O [ .tie'allotments-of,.S ate.Eounaaffon\nF,uncling:caletilate]Jof.$06/07lalKJunej301 2oo_z]s]6]ect to~oerioclic:aaiustments~-xtere~as1touows1 D. Determine the number of Magnet students residing in each District and attending a Magnet School. 1. Projected Endirig Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 lfa' ~=~~~~ava~Jli lculatea.arJune 30,\n20:011@:Q b-6Z . ajustments E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as ordered by the Court. 2 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 B.i1efilo@fbe1i6t@a1ia6ta2SJ1aolat6e?AbEtca1c01are:atatJu@mom2ooziidM b13ID71tsu6ie.ctlofotdictacHustmentsJ It should be noted that currently the Magnet Review Committee is reporting this information instead of the staff attorney as indicated in the Implementation Plan. F. Calculate state aid due the LRSD based upon the Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 ~~fsed''o!flieJnfofma'flon\"availat:ilef'lffe,.AD-E~ulate\"'di'af'JuiieE3o:200\"Ztfcm6@ 06/0trstifilecffctpefioqicWci)usfinents'! G. Process and distribute state aid for Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 t5istriou1lon.iliQflf.Y!0~ O~O7'.:)otalecfr T Allq_tinefil [c]latect,'for..,EYl06707 57: subjec eJo a rs, H. Calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school district is entitled. 1 . Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 Calculated for FY 06/07, subject to periodic adjustments. 3 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, September - June. I 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 o:isiri6riuonsRorifuYIO:ezo1ra1rou:o:e11r200M:wa J. Districts submit an estimated Magnet and M-to-M transportation budget to ADE. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, December of each year. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 In September 2006, the Magnet and M-to-M transportation budgets for FY 06/07 were submitted to the ADE by the Districts. K. The Coordinator of School Transportation notifies General Finance to pay districts for the Districts' proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 In September 2006, General Finance was notified to pay the third one-third payment for FY 05/06 to the Districts. In September 2006, General Finance was notified to pay the first one-third payment for FY 06/07 to the Districts. In March 2007, General Finance was notified to pay the second one-third payment for FY 06/07 to the Districts. It should be noted that the Transportation Coordinator is currently performing this function instead of Reginald Wilson as indicated in the Implementation Plan. 4 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) L. ADE pays districts three equal installments of their proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 In September 2006, General Finance made the last one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 05/06 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 2006, the following had been paid for FY 05/06: LRSD - $4,200,321.00 NLRSD - $975,891.96 PCSSD - $3,062,606.93 In September 2006, General Finance made the first one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 06/07 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 2006, the following had been paid for FY 06/07: LRSD - $1,413,384.34 NLRSD - $333,217.73 PCSSD -$1,074,447.23 In March 2007, General Finance made the second one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 06/07 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At March 2007, the following had been paid for FY 06/07: LRSD - $2,826,768.68 NLRSD - $666,435.46 PCSSD - $2,148,894.46 M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 5 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued} M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) In August 1997, the ADE transportation coordinator reviewed each district's Magnet and M-to-M transportation costs for FY 96/97. In July 1998, each district was asked to submit an estimated budget for the 98/99 school year. In September 1998, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 98/99 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. School districts should receive payment by October 1, 1998 In September 1999, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 99/00 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2000, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 00/01 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2001, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 01/02 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2002, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 02/03 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2003, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 03/04 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2004, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 04/05 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In October 2005, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 05/06 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2006, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 06/07 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as stated in Exhibit A of the Implementation Plan. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 6 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) ' In FY 94/95, the State purchased 52 buses at a cost of $1,799,431 which were added to or replaced existing Magnet and M-to-M buses in the Districts. The buses were distributed to the Districts as follows: LRSD - 32\nNLRSD - 6\nand PCSSD - 14. The ADE purchased 64 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $2,334,800 in FY 95/96. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 45\nNLRSD - 7\nand PCSSD -12. In May 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $646,400. In July 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $624,879. In July 1998, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $695,235. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD-6. Specifications for 16 school buses have been forwarded to state purchasing for bidding in January, 1999 for delivery in July, 1999. In July 1999, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $718,355. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD- 6. In July 2000, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $724,165. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD - 6. The bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was let by State Purchasing on February 22, 2001. The contract was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include two 47 passenger buses for $43,426.00 each and fourteen 65 passenger buses for $44,289.00 each. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 2 of the 4 7 passenger and 4 of the 65 passenger buses. On August 2, 2001, the ADE took possession of 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $706,898. 7 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) ! In June 2002, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include five 47 passenger buses for $42,155.00 each, ten 65 passenger buses for $43,850.00 each, and one 47 passenger bus with a wheelchair lift for $46,952.00. The total amount was $696,227. In August of 2002, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $696,227. In June 2003, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include 5 - 4 7 passenger buses for $47,052.00 each, and 11 - 65 passenger buses for $48,895.00 each. The total amount was $773,105. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 5 of the 47 passenger and 1 of the 65 passenger buses. In June 2004, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The price for the buses was $49,380 each for a total cost of $790,080. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8, NLRSD - 2, and PCSSD - 6. In June 2005, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses for the LRSD include 8 - 65 passenger buses for $53,150.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 1 - 47 passenger bus for $52,135.00, and 1 - 65 passenger bus for $53,150.00. The buses for the PCSSD include 6 - 65 passenger buses for $53,150.00 each. The total amount was $849,385.00. In March 2006, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Central States Bus Sales. The buses for the LRSD include 8 - 65 passenger buses for $56,810.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 1 - 47 passenger bus for $54,990.00, and 1 - 65 passenger bus for $56,810.00. The buses for the PCSSD include 6 - 65 passenger buses for $56,810.00 each. The total amount was $907,140.00. In March 2007, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Central States Bus Sales. The buses for the LRSD include 4 - 47 passenger buses for $63,465.00 each, and 4 - 65 passenger buses for $66,390.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 2 - 47 passenger buses for $63,465.00 each. The buses for the PCSSD include 1 - 65 passenger bus with a lift for $72,440.00 and 5-47 passenger buses for$63,465.00 each. The total amount was $1,036,115.00. 8 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) 0. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to LRSD as required by page 23 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 and January 1, of each school year through January 1, 1999. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 Obligation fulfilled in FY 96/97. P. Process and distribute additional payments in lieu of formula to LRSD as required by page 24 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. Q . Process and distribute payments to PCSSD as required by Page 28 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1994. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 Final payment was distributed July 1994. R. Upon loan request by LRSD accompanied by a promissory note, the ADE makes loans to LRSD. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing through July 1, 1999. See Settlement Agreement page 24. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 The LRSD received $3,000,000 on September 10, 1998. As of this reporting date, the LRSD has received $20,000,000 in loan proceeds. 9 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) S. Process and distribute payments in lieu of formula to PCSSD required by page 29 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. T. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to NLRSD as required by page 31 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 of each school year through June 30, 1996. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. U. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 00/01. Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 02/03. 1 0 I. FINANCIAL OBUGATIONS (Continued} U. Process.and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued} Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 04/05. Distribution in July 2005 for FY 05/06 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 05/06. Distribution in July 2006 for FY 06/07 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 06/07. V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. 1. Projected Ending Date Not applicable. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 00/01. Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 04/05. 11 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) Distribution in July 2005 for FY 05/06 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 05/06. Distribution in July 2006 for FY 06/07 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 06/07. 12 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. 1. Projected Ending Date January 15, 1995 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 In May 1995, monitors completed the unannounced visits of schools in Pulaski County. The monitoring process involved a qualitative process of document reviews, interviews, and observations. The monitoring focused on progress made since the announced monitoring visits. In June 1995, monitoring data from unannounced visits was included in the July Semiannual Report. Twenty-five per cent of all classrooms were visited, and all of the schools in Pulaski County were monitored. All principals were interviewed to determine any additional progress since the announced visits. The July 1995 Monitoring Report was reviewed by the ADE administrative team, the Arkansas State Board of Education, and the Districts and filed with the Court. The report was formatted in accordance with the Allen Letter. In October 1995, a common terminology was developed by principals from the Districts and the Lead Planning and Desegregation staff to facilitate the monitoring process. The announced monitoring visits began on November 14, 1995 and were completed on January 26, 1996. Copies of the preliminary Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the ADE administrative team and the State Board of Education in January 1996. A report on the current status of the Cycle 5 schools in the ECOE process and their school improvement plans was filed with the Court on February 1, 1996. The unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1996 and ended on May 10, 1996. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and the data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Districts provided data on enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Districts and the ADE Desegregation Monitoring staff developed a definition for instructional programs. 13 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996 with copies distributed to the parties. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996 and concluded in December 1996. In January 1997, presentations were made to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties to review the draft Semiannual Monitoring Report. The monitoring instrument and process were evaluated for their usefulness in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on achievement disparities. In February 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was filed. Unannounced monitoring visits began on February 3, 1997 and concluded in May 1997. In March 1997, letters were sent to the Districts regarding data requirements for the July 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and the additional discipline data element that was requested by the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Desegregation data collection workshops were conducted in the Districts from March 28, 1997 to April 7, 1997. A meeting was conducted on April 3, 1997 to finalize plans for the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report. Onsite visits were made to Cycle 1 schools who did not submit accurate and timely data on discipline, M-to-M transfers, and policy. The July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were finalized in June 1997. In July 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were filed with the court, and the ADE sponsored a School Improvement Conference. On July 10, 1997, copies of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were made available to the Districts for their review prior to filing it with the Court. In August 1997, procedures and schedules were organized for the monitoring of the Cycle 2 schools in FY 97 /98. 14 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) A Desegregation Monitoring and School Improvement Workshop for the Districts was held on September 10, 1997 to discuss monitoring expectations, instruments, data collectio~ and school improvement visits. On October 9, 1997, a planning meeting was held with the desegregation monitoring staff to discuss deadlines, responsibilities, and strategic planning issues regarding the Semiannual Monitoring Report. Reminder letters were sent to the Cycle 2 principals outlining the data collection deadlines and availability of technical assistance. In October and November 1997, technical assistance visits were conducted, and announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 2 schools were completed. In December 1997 and January 1998, technical assistance visits were conducted regarding team visits, technical review recommendations, and consensus building. Copies of the infusion document and perceptual surveys were provided to schools in the ECOE process. The February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report was submitted for review and approval to the State Board of Education, the Director, the Administrative Team, the Attorney General's Office, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process, external team visits and finalizing school improvement plans. On February 18, 1998, the representatives of all parties met to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. Additional meetings will be scheduled. Unannounced monitoring visits were conducted in March 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process and external team visits. In April 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were conducted, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. 15 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) In May 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. On May 18, 1998, the Court granted the ADE relief from its obligation to file the July 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report to develop proposed modifications to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. In June 1998, monitoring information previously submitted by the districts in the Spring of 1998 was reviewed and prepared for historical files and presentation to the Arkansas State Board. Also, in June the following occurred: a) The Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed, b) the Semiannual Monitoring COE Data Report was completed, c) progress reports were submitted from previous cycles, and d.) staff development on assessment (SAT-9) and curriculum alignment was conducted with three supervisors. In July, the Lead Planner provided the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee with (1) a review of the court Order relieving ADE of its obligation to file a July Semiannual Monitoring Report, and (2) an update of ADE's progress toward work with the parties and ODM to develop proposed revisions to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. The Committee encouraged ODM, the parties and the ADE to continue to work toward revision of the monitoring and reporting process. In August 1998, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Attorney General, the Assistant Director for Accountability and the Education Lead Planner updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and proposed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. In September 1998, tentative monitoring dates were established and they will be finalized once proposed revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring Plan are finalized and approved. In September/October 1998, progress was being made on the proposed revisions to the monitoring process by committee representatives of all the Parties in the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement. While the revised monitoring plan is finalized and approved, the ADE monitoring staff will continue to provide technical assistance to schools upon request. 16 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) In December 1998, requests were received from schools in PCSSD regarding test score analysis and staff Development. Oak Grove is scheduled for January 21, 1999 and Lawson Elementary is also tentatively scheduled in January. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD has been rescheduled for April 2000. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD was conducted on May 5, 2000 and May 9, 2000 respectively. Staff development regarding classroom management was provided to the Franklin Elementary School in LRSD on November 8, 2000. Staff development regarding ways to improve academic achievement was presented to College Station Elementary in PCSSD on November 22, 2000. On November 1, 2000, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Director for Accountability updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and discussed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for February 27, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group meeting that was scheduled for February 27 had to be postponed. It will be rescheduled as soon as possible. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting is scheduled for June 27, 2001. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from June 27. It will take place on July 26, 2001 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 17 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (dontinued) On July 26, 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 11, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. On October 11, 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the ADE's intent to take a proactive role in Desegregation Monitoring. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 10, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting that was scheduled for January 10 was postponed. It has been rescheduled for February 14, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On February 12, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 11, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On April 11, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 11, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. 18 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) On July 18, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, talked about section XV in the Project Management Tool (PMT) on Standardized Test Selection to Determine Loan Forgiveness. She said that the goal has been completed, and no additional reporting is required for section XV. Mr. Morris discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. He handed out a Court Order from May 9, 2002, which contained comments from U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr., about hearings on the LRSD request for unitary status. Mr. Morris also handed out a document from the Secretary of Education about the No Child Left Behind Act. There was discussion about how this could have an affect on Desegregation issues. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 10, 2002 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from October 10. It will take place on October 29, 2002 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. On October 29, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Meetings with the parties to discuss possible revisions to the AD E's monitoring plan will be postponed by request of the school districts in Pulaski County. Additional meetings could be scheduled after the Desegregation ruling is finalized. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 9, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On January 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. No Child Left Behind and the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD were discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from April 10. It will take place on April 24, 2003 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 19 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) On April 24, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Laws passed by the legislature need to be checked to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Ray Lumpkin was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he left, we will discuss the legislation with Clearence Lovell. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On August 28, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The LRSD has been instructed to submit evidence showing progress in reducing disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. This is supposed to be done by March of 2004, so that the LRSD can achieve unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 9, 2003 at the ADE. On October 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 8, 2004 at the ADE. On October 16, 2003, ADE staff met with the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee at the State Capitol. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, and Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, presented the Chronology of activity by the ADE in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan for the Desegregation Settlement Agreement. They also discussed the role of the ADE Desegregation Monitoring Section. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, reported on legal issues relating to the Pulaski County Desegregation Case. Ann Marshall shared a history of activities by ODM, and their view of the activity of the school districts in Pulaski County. John Kunkel discussed Desegregation funding by the ADE. 20 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) On November 4, 2004, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The ADE is required to check laws that the legislature passes to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Clearance Lovell was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he has retired, the ADE attorney will find out who will be checking the next legislation. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 6, 2005 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On May 3, 2005, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The PCSSD has petitioned to be released from some desegregation monitoring. There was discussion in the last legislative session that suggested all three districts in Pulaski County should seek unitary status. Legislators also discussed the possibility of having two school districts in Pulaski County instead of three. An Act was passed by the Legislature to conduct a feasability study of having only a north school district and a south school district in Pulaski County. Removing Jacksonville from the PCSSD is also being studied. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 7, 2005 at 1:30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On June 20, 2006, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. ADE staff from the Office of Public School Academic Accountability updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The purpose, content, and due date for information going into the Project Management Tool and its Executive Summary were reported. There was discussion about the three districts in Pulaski County seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 17, 2006 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 21 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) On March 16, 2007, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review previous Implementation Phase activities. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, reported that U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr. declared the LRSD unitary and released the district from federal court supervision. It was stated that the ADE should continue desegregation reporting until the deadline for an appeal filing has past, or until an appeal has been denied. House Bill 1829 passed the House and Senate. This says the ADE should hire consultants to determine whether and in what respects any of the Pulaski County districts are unitary. It authorizes the ADE and the Attorney General to seek proper federal court review and determination of the current unitary status and allows the State of Arkansas to continue payments under a post-unitary agreement to the three Pulaski County districts for a time period not to exceed seven years. The three Pulaski County districts may be reimbursed for legal fees incurred for seeking unitary or partial unitary status if their motions seeking unitary status or partial unitary status are filed no later than October 30, 2007, and the school districts are declared unitary or at least partially unitary by the federal district court no later than June 14, 2008. Matt McCoy and Scott Richardson from the Attorney General's Office updated the group on legal issues related to desegregation. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 5, 2007 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 22 111. A PETITION FOR ELECTION FOR LRSD WILL BE SUPPORTED SHOULD A MILLAGE BE REQUIRED A. Monitor court pleadings to determine if LRSD has petitioned the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 Ongoing. All Court pleadings are monitored monthly. B. Draft and file appropriate pleadings if LRSD petitions the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 To date, no action has been taken by the LRSD. 23 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION A. Using a collaborative approach, immediately identify those laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date December, 1994 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. B. Conduct a review within ADE of existing legislation and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. C. Request of the other parties to the Settlement Agreement that they identify laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. D. Submit proposals to the State Board of Education for repeal of those regulations that are confirmed to be impediments to desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. 24 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 A committee within the ADE'was formed in May 1995 to review and collect data on existing legislation and regulations identified by the parties as impediments to desegregation. The committee researched the Districts' concerns to determine if any of the rules, regulations, or legislation cited impede desegregation. The legislation cited by the Districts regarding loss funding and worker's compensation were not reviewed because they had already been litigated. In September 1995, the committee reviewed the following statutes, acts, and regulations: Act 113 of 1993\nADE Director's Communication 93-205\nAct 145 of 1989\nADE Director's Memo 91-67\nADE Program Standards Eligibility Criteria for Special Education\nArkansas Codes 6-18-206, 6-20-307, 6-20-319, and 6-17-1506. In October 1995, the individual reports prepared by committee members in their areas of expertise and the data used to support their conclusions were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. A report was prepared and submitted to the State Board of Education in July 1996. The report concluded that none of the items reviewed impeded desegregation. As of February 3, 1997, no laws or regulations have been determined to impede desegregation efforts. Any new education laws enacted during the Arkansas 81st Legislative Session will be reviewed at the close of the legislative session to ensure that they do not impede desegregation. In April 1997, copies of all laws passed during the 1997 Regular Session of the 81 st General Assembly were requested from the office of the ADE Liaison to the Legislature for distribution to the Districts for their input and review of possible impediments to their desegregation efforts. In August 1997, a meeting to review the statutes passed in the prior legislative session was scheduled for September 9, 1997. 25 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued} E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued} On September 9, 1997, a meeting was held to discuss the review of the statutes passed in the prior legislative session and new ADE regulations. The Districts will be contacted in writing for their input regarding any new laws or regulations that they feel may impede desegregation. Additionally, the Districts will be asked to review their regulations to ensure that they do not impede their desegregation efforts. The committee will convene on December 1, 1997 to review their findings and finalize their report to the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. In October 1997, the Districts were asked to review new regulations and statutes for impediments to their desegregation efforts, and advise the ADE, in writing, if they feel a regulation or statute may impede their desegregation efforts. In October 1997, the Districts were requested to advise the ADE, in writing, no later than November 1, 1997 of any new law that might impede their desegregation efforts. As of November 12, 1997, no written responses were received from the Districts. The ADE concludes that the Districts do not feel that any new law negatively impacts their desegregation efforts. The committee met on December 1, 1997 to discuss their findings regarding statutes and regulations that may impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. The committee concluded that there were no laws or regulations that impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. It was decided that the committee chair would prepare a report of the committee's findings for the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation is now reviewing proposed bills and regulations, as well as laws that are being signed in, for the current 1999 legislative session. They will continue to do so until the session is over. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation will meet on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The committee met on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The purpose of the meeting was to identify rules and regulations that might impede desegregation, and review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. This is a standing committee that is ongoing and a report will be submitted to the State Board of Education once the process is completed. 26 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) t The committee met on May 24, 1999 at the ADE. The committee was asked to review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. The committee determined that Mr. Ray Lumpkin would contact the Pulaski County districts to request written response to any rules, regulations or laws that might impede desegregation. The committee would also collect information and data to prepare a report for the State Board. This will be a standing committee. This data gathering will be ongoing until the final report is given to the State Board. On July 26, 1999, the committee met at the ADE. The committee did not report any laws or regulations that they currently thought would impede desegregation, and are still waiting for a response from the three districts in Pulaski County. The committee met on August 30, 1999 at the ADE to review rules and regulations that might impede desegregation. At that time, there were no laws under review that appeared to impede desegregation. In November, the three districts sent letters to the ADE stating that they have reviewed the laws passed by the 82nd legislative session as well as current rules \u0026amp; regulations and district policies to ensure that they have no ill effect on desegregation efforts. There was some concern from PCSSD concerning a charter school proposal in the Maumelle area. The work of the committee is on-going each month depending on the information that comes before the committee. Any rules, laws or regulations that would impede desegregation will be discussed and reported to the State Board of Education. On October 4, 2000, the ADE presented staff development for assistant superintendents in LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD regarding school laws of Arkansas. The ADE is in the process of forming a committee to review all Rules and Regulations from the ADE and State Laws that might impede desegregation. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will review all new laws that might impede desegregation once the 83rd General Assembly has completed this session. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will meet for the first time on June 11, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. in room 204-A at the ADE. The committee will review all new laws that might impede desegregation that were passed during the 2001 Legislative Session. 27 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations rescheduled the meeting that was planned for June 11, in order to review new regulations proposed to the State Board of Education. The meeting will take place on July 16, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on July 16, 2001 at the ADE. The following Items were discussed: (1) Review of 2001 state laws which appear to impede desegregation. (2) Review of existing ADE regulations which appear to impede desegregation. (3) Report any laws or regulations found to impede desegregation to the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts. The next meeting will take place on August 27, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on August 27, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on September 10, 2001 in Conference Room 204-8 at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on September 10, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on October 24, 2001 in Conference Room 204-8 at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on October 24, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. On December 17, 2001, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation composed letters that will be sent to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. Laws to review include those of the 83rd General Assembly, ADE regulations, and regulations of the Districts. 28 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) On January 10, 2002, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to respond by March 8, 2002. On March 5, 2002, A letter was sent from the LRSD which mentioned Act 1748 and Act 1667 passed during the 83rd Legislative Session which may impede desegregation. These laws will be researched to determine if changes need to be made. A letter was sent from the NLRSD on March 19, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation. On April 26, 2002, A letter was sent for the PCSSD to the ADE, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation except the \"deannexation\" legislation which the District opposed before the Senate committee. On October 27, 2003, the ADE sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County asking if there were any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to review laws passed during the 84th Legislative Session, any new ADE rules or regulations, and district policies. 29 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES A. Through a preamble to the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 The preamble was contained in the Implementation Plan filed with the Court on March 15, 1994. B. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 Ongoing C. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement by actions taken by ADE in response to monitoring results. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 Ongoing D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 30 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 . I At each regular monthly meeting of the State Board of Education, the Board is provided copies of the most recent Project Management Tool (PMT) and an executive summary of the PMT for their review and approval. Only activities that are in addition to the Board's monthly review of the PMT are detailed below. In May 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the total number of schools visited during the monitoring phase and the data collection process. Suggestions were presented to the State Board of Education on how recommendations could be presented in the monitoring reports. In June 1995, an update on the status of the pending Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the State Board of Education. In July 1995, the July Semiannual Monitoring Report was reviewed by the State Board of Education. On August 14, 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the need to increase minority participation in the teacher scholarship program and provided tentative monitoring dates to facilitate reporting requests by the ADE administrative team and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In September 1995, the State Board of Education was advised of a change in the PMT from a table format to a narrative format. The Board was also briefed about a meeting with the Office of Desegregation Monitoring regarding the PMT. In October 1995, the State Board of Education was updated on monitoring timelines. The Board was also informed of a meeting with the parties regarding a review of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and the monitoring process, and the progress of the test validation study. In November 1995, a report was made to the State Board of Education regarding the monitoring schedule and a meeting with the parties concerning the development of a common terminology for monitoring purposes. In December 1995, the State Board of Education was updated regarding announced monitoring visits. In January 1996, copies of the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the State Board of Education. 31 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) ' During the months of February 1996 through May 1996, the PMT report was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. In June 1996, the State Board of Education was updated on the status of the bias review study. In July 1996, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the Court, the parties, ODM, the State Board of Education, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In August 1996, the State Board of Education and the ADE administrative team were provided with copies of the test validation study prepared by Dr. Paul Williams. During the months of September 1996 through December 1996, the PMTwas the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. On January 13, 1997, a presentation was made to the State Board of Education regarding the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report, and copies of the report and its executive summary were distributed to all Board members. The Project Management Tool and its executive summary were addressed at the February 10, 1997 State Board of Education meeting regarding the ADE's progress in fulfilling their obligations as set forth in the Implementation Plan. In March 1997, the State Board of Education was notified that historical information in the PMT had been summarized at the direction of the Assistant Attorney General in order to reduce the size and increase the clarity of the report. The Board was updated on the Pulaski County Desegregation Case and reviewed the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued by the Court on February 18, 1997 in response to the Districts' motion for summary judgment on the issue of state funding for teacher retirement matching contributions. During the months of April 1997 through June 1997, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. The State Board of Education received copies of the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and executive summary at the July Board meeting. 32 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regularoversight of the Implementation Phase's Project ManagementTool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued} 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) ' The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on August 4, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. A special report regarding a historical review of the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement and the ADE's role and monitoring obligations were presented to the State Board of Education on September 8, 1997. Additionally, the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Board for their review. In October 1997, a special draft report regarding disparity in achievement was submitted to the State Board Chairman and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In November 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on November 3, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. In December 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. In January 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and discussed ODM's report on the ADE's monitoring activities and instructed the Director to meet with the parties to discuss revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. In February 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and discussed the February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report. In March 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary and was provided an update regarding proposed revisions to the monitoring process. In April 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In May 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. 33 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) ! In June 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also reviewed how the ADE would report progress in the PMT concerning revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In July 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also received an update on Test Validation, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee Meeting, and revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In August 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the five discussion points regarding the proposed revisions to the monitoring and reporting process. The Board also reviewed the basic goal of the Minority Recruitment Committee. In September 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed the proposed modifications to the Monitoring plans by reviewing the common core of written response received from the districts. The primary commonalities were (1) Staff Development, (2) Achievement Disparity and (3) Disciplinary Disparity. A meeting of the parties is scheduled to be conducted on Thursday, September 17, 1998. The Board encouraged the Department to identify a deadline for Standardized Test Validation and Test Selection. In October 1998, the Board received the progress report on Proposed Revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring and Reporting Process (see XVIII). The Board also reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In November, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the proposed revisions in the Desegregation monitoring Process and the update on Test validation and Test Selection provisions of the Settlement Agreement. The Board was also notified that the Implementation Plan Working Committee held its quarterly meeting to review progress and identify quarterly priorities. In December, the State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion by the ADE, the LRSD, NLRSD, and the PCSSD, to relieve the Department of its obligation to file a February Semiannual Monitoring Report. The Board was also notified that the Joshua lntervenors filed a motion opposing the joint motion. The Board was informed that the ADE was waiting on a response from Court. 34 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) ' In January, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion of the ADE, LRSD, PCSSD, and NLRSD for an order relieving the ADE of filing a February 1999 Monitoring Report. The motion was granted subject to the following three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua intervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement. In February, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was informed that the three conditions: ( 1) notify the Joshua lntervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement had been satisfied. The Joshua lntervenors were invited again to attend the meeting of the parties and they attended on January 13, and January 28, 1999. They are also scheduled to attend on February 17, 1998. The report of progress, a collaborative effort from all parties was presented to court on February 1, 1999. The Board was also informed that additional items were received for inclusion in the revised report, after the deadline for the submission of the progress report and the ADE would: (1) check them for feasibility, and fiscal impact if any, and (2) include the items in future drafts of the report. In March, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received and reviewed the Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Progress Report submitted to Court on February 1, 1999. On April 12, and May 10, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On June 14, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. 35 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) I On July 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On August 9, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On September 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On October 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was notified that on September 21, 1999 that the Office of Education Lead Planning and Desegregation Monitoring meet before the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee and presented them with the draft version of the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan. The State Board was notified that the plan would be submitted for Board review and approval when finalized. On November 8, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. 36 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) f On May 8, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 12, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 11, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 9, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 11 , 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 8, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 12, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 12, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 9, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 14, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 11, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. 37 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of AD E's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) r On July 9, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 13, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 10, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 8, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 19, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 10, 2001, the Arkansas State Boardof Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 11, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 11, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 13, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 10, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 12, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. 38 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) ' On September 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 18, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 14, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 12, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 9, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 11, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 8, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. 39 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project ManagementTool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) ' On January 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 10, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 14, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 11, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On January 10, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of November and December. On February 14, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 14, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 11, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. 40 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) I On May 9, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 13, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 11 , 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 8, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 12, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 10, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 14, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On January 9, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of November and December. On February 13, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 13, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 10, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 8, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 12, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 10, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. 41 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) y On August 14, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 11, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 9, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 13, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 11, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 17, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 12, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 12, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 9, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 14, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 11, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. Pn Julv..9 t 200Z, the ~rkaosas.State.Boar .. of Education revjewed,anq appcoved tlje\u0026amp;M] and~itsAexecillfveYsumrnarvlffi:Jfie\"?rnontb\"of!fwie1 42 VI. REMEDIATION A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 During May 1995, team visits to Cycle 4 schools were conducted, and plans were developed for reviewing the Cycle 5 schools. In June 1995, the current Extended COE packet was reviewed, and enhancements to the Extended COE packet were prepared. In July 1995, year end reports were finalized by the Pulaski County field service specialists, and plans were finalized for reviewing the draft improvement plans of the Cycle 5 schools. In August 1995, Phase I - Cycle 5 school improvement plans were reviewed. Plans were developed for meeting with the Districts to discuss plans for Phase II - Cycle 1 schools of Extended COE, and a school improvement conference was conducted in Hot Springs. The technical review visits for the FY 95/96 year and the documentation process were also discussed. In October 1995, two computer programs, the Effective Schools Planner and the Effective Schools Research Assistant, were ordered for review, and the first draft of a monitoring checklist for Extended COE was developed. Through the Extended COE process, the field service representatives provided technical assistance based on the needs identified within the Districts from the data gathered. In November 1995, ADE personnel discussed and planned for the FY 95/96 monitoring, and onsite visits were conducted to prepare schools for the FY 95/96 team visits. Technical review visits continued in the Districts. In December 1995, announced monitoring and technical assistance visits were conducted in the Districts. At December 31, 1995, approximately 59% of the schools in the Districts had been monitored. Technical review visits were conducted during January 1996. In February 1996, announced monitoring visits and midyear monitoring reports were completed, and the field service specialists prepared for the spring NCA/COE peer team visits. 43 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) f In March 1996, unannounced monitoring visits of Cycle 5 schools commenced, and two-day peer team visits of Cycle 5 schools were conducted. Two-day team visit materials, team lists and reports were prepared. Technical assistance was provided to schools in final preparation for team visits and to schools needing any school improvement information. In April and May 1996, the unannounced monitoring visits were completed. The unannounced monitoring forms were reviewed and included in the July monitoring report. The two-day peer team visits were completed, and annual COE monitoring reports were prepared. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits of the Cycle 5 schools were completed, and the data was analyzed. The Districts identified enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996, and copies were distributed to the parties. During August 1996, meetings were held with the Districts to discuss the monitoring requirements. Technical assistance meetings with Cycle 1 schools were planned for 96/97. The Districts were requested to record discipline data in accordance with the Allen Letter. In September 1996, recommendations regarding the ADE monitoring schedule for Cycle 1 schools and content layouts of the semiannual report were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. Training materials were developed and schedules outlined for Cycle 1 schools. In October 1996, technical assistance needs were identified and addressed to prepare each school for their team visits. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996. In December 1996, the announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools were completed, and technical assistance needs were identified from school site visits. In January 1997, the ECOE monitoring section identified technical assistance needs of the Cycle 1 schools, and the data was reviewed when the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, the State Board of Education, and the parties. 44 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued} 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (~ontinued} In February 1997, field service specialists prepared for the peer team visits of the Cycle 1 schools. NCA accreditation reports were presented to the NCA Committee, and NCA reports were prepared for presentation at the April NCA meeting in Chicago. From March to May 1997, 111 visits were made to schools or central offices to work with principals, ECOE steering committees, and designated district personnel concerning school improvement planning. A workshop was conducted on Learning Styles for Geyer Springs Elementary School. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 15-17, 1997. The conference included information on the process of continuous school improvement, results of the first five years of COE, connecting the mission with the school improvement plan, and improving academic performance. Technical assistance needs were evaluated for the FY 97 /98 school year in August 1997. From October 1997 to February 1998, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives. Technical assistance was provided to the Districts through meetings with the ECOE steering committees, assistance in analyzing perceptual surveys, and by providing samples of school improvement plans, Gold File catalogs, and web site addresses to schools visited. Additional technical assistance was provided to the Districts through discussions with the ECOE committees and chairs about the process. In November 1997, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives in conjunction with the announced monitoring visits. Workshops on brainstorming and consensus building and asking strategic questions were held in January and February 1998. In March 1998, the field service representatives conducted ECOE team visits and prepared materials for the NCA workshop. Technical assistance was provided in workshops on the ECOE process and team visits. In April 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process and academically distressed schools. In May 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process, and team visits were conducted. 45 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (~ontinued) In June 1998, the Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 13-15, 1998. Major conference topics included information on the process of continuous school improvement, curriculum alignment, \"Smart Start,\" Distance Learning, using data to improve academic performance, educational technology, and multicultural education. All school districts in Arkansas were invited and representatives from Pulaski County attended. In September 1998, requests for technical assistance were received, visitation schedules were established, and assistance teams began visiting the Districts. Assistance was provided by telephone and on-site visits. The ADE provided inservice training on \"Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement\" at Gibbs Magnet Elementary school on October 5, 1998 at their request. The staff was taught how to increase test scores through data disaggregation, analysis, alignment, longitudinal achievement review, and use of individualized test data by student, teacher, class and content area. Information was also provided regarding the \"Smart Start\" and the \"Academic Distress\" initiatives. On October 20, 1998, ECOE technical assistance was provided to Southwest Jr. High School. B. Identify available resources for providing technical assistance for the specific condition, or circumstances of need, considering resources within ADE and the Districts, and also resources available from outside sources and experts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. C. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 46 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) C. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 An updated ERIC Search w~s conducted on May 15, 1995 to locate research on evaluating compensatory education programs. The ADE received the updated ERIC disc that covered material through March 1995. An ERIC search was conducted in September 30, 1996 to identify current research dealing with the evaluation of compensatory education programs, and the articles were reviewed. An ERIC search was conducted in April 1997 to identify current research on compensatory education programs and sent to the Cycle 1 principals and the field service specialists for their use. An Eric search was conducted in October 1998 on the topic of Compensatory Education and related descriptors. The search included articles with publication dates from 1997 through July 1998. D. Identify and research technical resources available to ADE and the Districts through programs and organizations such as the Desegregation Assistance Center in San Antonio, Texas. 1. Projected Ending Date Summer 1994 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. E. Solicit, obtain, and use available resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. 47 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 From March 1995 through July 1995, technical assistance and resources were obtained from the following sources: the Southwest Regional Cooperative\nUALR regarding training for monitors\nODM on a project management software\nADHE regarding data review and display\nand Phi Delta Kappa, the Desegregation Assistance Center and the Dawson Cooperative regarding perceptual surveys. Technical assistance was received on the Microsoft Project software in November 1995, and a draft of the PMT report using the new software package was presented to the ADE administrative team for review. In December 1995, a data manager was hired permanently to provide technical assistance with computer software and hardware. In October 1996, the field service specialists conducted workshops in the Districts to address their technical assistance needs and provided assistance for upcoming team visits. In November and December 1996, the field service specialists addressed technical assistance needs of the schools in the Districts as they were identified and continued to provide technical assistance for the upcoming team visits. In January 1997, a draft of the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties. The ECOE monitoring section of the report included information that identified technical assistance needs and resources available to the Cycle 1 schools. Technical assistance was provided during the January 29-31, 1997 Title I MidWinter Conference. The conference emphasized creating a learning community by building capacity schools to better serve all children and empowering parents to acquire additional skills and knowledge to better support the education of their children. In February 1997, three ADE employees attended the Southeast Regional Conference on Educating Black Children. Participants received training from national experts who outlined specific steps that promote and improve the education of black children. 48 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) On March 6-9, 1997, three members of the ADE's Technical Assistance Section attended the National Committee for School Desegregation Conference. The participants received training in strategies for Excellence and Equity: Empowerment and Training for the Future. Specific information was received regarding the current status of court-ordered desegregation, unitary status, and resegregation and distributed to the Districts and ADE personnel. The field service specialists attended workshops in March on ACT testing and school improvement to identify technical assistance resources available to the Districts and the ADE that will facilitate desegregation efforts. ADE personnel attended the Eighth Annual Conference on Middle Level Education in Arkansas presented by the Arkansas Association of Middle Level Education on April 6-8, 1997. The theme of the conference was Sailing Toward New Horizons. In May 1997, the field service specialists attended the NCA annual conference and an inservice session with Mutiu Fagbayi. An Implementation Oversight Committee member participated in the Consolidated COE Plan inservice training. In June and July 1997, field service staff attended an SAT-9 testing workshop and participated in the three-day School Improvement Conference held in Hot Springs. The conference provided the Districts with information on the COE school improvement process, technical assistance on monitoring and assessing achievement, availability of technology for the classroom teacher, and teaching strategies for successful student achievement. In August 1997, field service personnel attended the ASCD Statewide Conference and the AAEA Administrators Conference. On August 18, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held and presentations were made on the Early Literacy Learning in Arkansas (ELLA) program and the Schools of the 21st Century program. In September 1997, technical assistance was provided to the Cycle 2 principals on data collection for onsite and offsite monitoring. ADE personnel attended the Region VI Desegregation Conference in October 1997. Current desegregation and educational equity cases and unitary status issues were the primary focus of the conference. On October 14, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held in Paragould to enable members to observe a 21st Century school and a school that incorporates traditional and multi-age classes in its curriculum. 49 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) In November 1997, the field service representatives attended the Governor's Partnership Workshop to discuss how to tie the committee's activities with the ECOE process. In March 1998, the field service representatives attended a school improvement conference and conducted workshops on team building and ECOE team visits. Staff development seminars on Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement are scheduled for March 23, 1998 and March 27, 1998 for the Districts. In April 1998, the Districts participated in an ADE seminar to aid them in evaluating and improving student achievement. In August 1998, the Field Service Staff attended inservice to provide further assistance to schools, i.e., Title I Summer Planning Session, ADE session on Smart Start, and the School Improvement Workshops. All schools and districts in Pulaski County were invited to attend the \"Smart Start\" Summit November 9, 10, and 11 to learn more about strategies to increase student performance. \"Smart Start\" is a standards-driven educational initiative which emphasizes the articulation of clear standards for student achievement and accurate measures of progress against those standards through assessments, staff development and individual school accountability. The Smart Start Initiative focused on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. Representatives from all three districts attended. On January 21, 1998, the ADE provided staff development for the staff at Oak Grove Elementary School designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement. Using achievement data from Oak Grove, educators reviewed trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. On February 24, 1999, the ADE provided staff development for the administrative staff at Clinton Elementary School regarding analysis of achievement data. On February 15, 1999, staff development was rescheduled for Lawson Elementary School. The staff development program was designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement using achievement data from Lawson, educators reviewed the components of the Arkansas Smart Initiative, trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. Student Achievement Workshops were rescheduled for Southwest Jr. High in the Little Rock School District, and the Oak Grove Elementary School in the Pulaski County School District. 50 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) On April 30, 1999, a Studert Achievement Workshop was conducted for Oak Grove Elementary School in PCSSD. The Student Achievement Workshop for Southwest Jr. High in LRSD has been rescheduled. On June 8, 1999, a workshop was presented to representatives from each of the Arkansas Education Service Cooperatives and representatives from each of the three districts in Pulaski County. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACT MP). On June 18, 1999, a workshop was presented to administrators of the NLRSD. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACT MP). On August 16, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACT MP program was presented during the preschool staff development activities for teaching assistant in the LRSD. On August 20, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACTMP program was presented during the preschool staff development activities for the Accelerated Learning Center in the LRSD. On September 13, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACT MP program were presented to the staff at Booker T. Washington Magnet Elementary School. On September 27, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was presented to the Middle and High School staffs of the NLRSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACT MP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On October 26, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was presented to LRSD personnel through a staff development training class. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACT MP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On December 7, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was scheduled for Southwest Middle School in the LRSD. The workshop was also set to cover the components of the new ACT MP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. However, Southwest Middle School administrators had a need to reschedule, therefore the workshop will be rescheduled. 51 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) On January 10, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for both Dr. Martin Luther King Magnet Elementary School \u0026amp; Little Rock Central High School. The workshops also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On March 1, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for all principals and district level administrators in the PCSSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On April 12, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for the LRSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. Targeted staffs from the middle and junior high schools in the three districts in Pulaski County attended the Smart Step Summit on May 1 and May 2. Training was provided regarding the overview of the \"Smart Step\" initiative, \"Standard and Accountability in Action,\" and \"Creating Learning Environments Through Leadership Teams.\" The ADE provided training on the development of alternative assessment September 12-13, 2000. Information was provided regarding the assessment of Special Education and LEP students. Representatives from each district were provided the opportunity to select a team of educators from each school within the district to participate in professional development regarding Integrating Curriculum and Assessment K-12. The professional development activity was directed by the national consultant, Dr. Heidi Hays Jacobs, on September 14 and 15, 2000. The ADE provided professional development workshops from October 2 through October 13, 2000 regarding, \"The Write Stuff: Curriculum Frameworks, Content Standards and Item Development.\" Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation provided the training. Representatives from each district were provided the opportunity to select a team of educators from each school within the district to participate. The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems by video conference for Special Education and LEP Teachers on November 17, 2000. Also, Alternative Assessment Portfolio System Training was provided for testing coordinators through teleconference broadcast on November 27, 2000. 52 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) On December 12, 2000, the ADE provided training for Test Coordinators on end of course assessments in Geometry and Algebra I Pilot examination. Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation conducted the professional development at the Arkansas Teacher Retirement Building. The ADE presented a one-day training session with Dr. Cecil Reynolds on the Behavior Assessment for Children (BASC). This took place on December 7, 2000 at the NLRSD Administrative Annex. Dr. Reynolds is a practicing clinical psychologist. He is also a professor at Texas A \u0026amp; M University and a nationally known author. In the training, Dr. Reynolds addressed the following: 1) how to use and interpret information obtained on the direct observation form, 2) how to use this information for programming, 3) when to use the BASC, 4) when to refer for more or additional testing or evaluation, 5) who should complete the forms and when, (i.e., parents, teachers, students), 6) how to correctly interpret scores. This training was intended to especially benefit School Psychology Specialists, psychologists, psychological examiners, educational examiners and counselors. During January 22-26, 2001 the ADE presented the ACT AAP Intermediate (Grade 6) Benchmark Professional Development Workshop on Item Writing. Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation provided the training. Representatives from each district were invited to attend. On January 12, 2001 the ADE presented test administrators training for mid-year End of Course (Pilot) Algebra I and Geometry exams. This was provided for schools with block scheduling. On January 13, 2001 the ADE presented SmartScience Lessons and worked with teachers to produce curriculum. This was shared with eight Master Teachers. The SmartScience Lessons were developed by the Arkansas Science Teachers Association in conjunction with the Wilbur Mills Educational Cooperative under an Eisenhower grant provided by the ADE. The purpose of SmartScience is to provide K-6 teachers with activity-oriented science lessons that incorporate reading, writing, and mathematics skills. The following training has been provided for educators in the three districts in Pulaski County by the Division of Special Education at the ADE since January 2000: On January 6, 2000, training was conducted for the Shannon Hills Pre-school Program, entitled \"Things you can do at home to support your child's learning.\" This was presented by Don Boyd - ASERC and Shelley Weir. The school's director and seven parents attended. 53 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) On March 8, 2000, training was conducted for the Southwest Middle School in Little Rock, on ADD. Six p'eople attended the training. There was follow-up training on Learning and Reading Styles on March 26. This was presented by Don Boyd - ASERC and Shelley Weir. On September 7, 2000, Autism and Classroom Accommodations for the LRSD at Chicot Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Karen Sabo, Kindergarten Teacher\nMelissa Gleason, Paraprofessional\nCurtis Mayfield, P.E. Teacher\nLisa Poteet, Speech Language Pathologist\nJane Harkey, Principal\nKathy Penn-Norman, Special Education Coordinator\nAlice Phillips, Occupational Therapist. On September 15, 2000, the Governor's Developmental Disability Coalition Conference presented Assistive Technology Devices \u0026amp; Services. This was held at the Arlington Hotel in Hot Springs. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On September 19, 2000, Autism and Classroom Accommodations for the LRSD at Jefferson Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Melissa Chaney, Special Education Teacher\nBarbara Barnes, Special Education Coordinator\na Principal, a Counselor, a Librarian, and a Paraprofessional. On October 6, 2000, Integrating Assistive Technology Into Curriculum was presented at a conference in the Hot Springs Convention Center. Presenters were: Bryan Ayers and Aleecia Starkey. Speech Language Pathologists from LRSD and NLRSD attended. On October 24, 2000, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On October 25 and 26, 2000, Alternate Assessment for Students with Severe Disabilities for the LRSD at J. A. Fair High School was presented. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. The participants were: Susan Chapman, Special Education Coordinator\nMary Steele, Special Education Teacher\nDenise Nesbit, Speech Language Pathologist\nand three Paraprofessionals. On November 14, 2000, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On November 17, 2000, training was conducted on Autism for the LRSD at the Instructional Resource Center. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. 54 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) On December 5, 2000, Access to the Curriculum Via the use of Assistive Technology Computer Lab was presented. Bryan Ayres was the presenter of this teleconference. The participants were: Tim Fisk, Speech Language Pathologist from Arch Ford Education Service Cooperative at Plumerville and Patsy Lewis, Special Education Teacher from Mabelvale Middle School in the LRSD. On January 9, 2001, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. Kathy Brown, a vision consultant from the LRSD, was a participant. On January 23, 2001, Autism and Classroom Modifications for the LRSD at Brady Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Beverly Cook, Special Education Teacher\nAmy Littrell, Speech Language Pathologist\nJan Feurig, Occupational Therapist\nCarolyn James, Paraprofessional\nCindy Kackly, Paraprofessional\nand Rita Deloney, Paraprofessional. The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems for Special Education and Limited English Proficient students through teleconference broadcast on February 5, 2001. Presenters were: Charlotte Marvel, ADE\nDr. Gayle Potter, ADE\nMarcia Harding, ADE\nLynn Springfield, ASERC\nMary Steele, J. A. Fair High School, LRSD\nBryan Ayres, Easter Seals Outreach. This was provided for Special Education teachers and supervisors in the morning, and Limited English Proficient teachers and supervisors in the afternoon. The Special Education session was attended by 29 teachers/administrators and provided answers to specific questions about the alternate assessment portfolio system and the scoring rubric and points on the rubric to be used to score the portfolios. The LEP session was attended by 16 teachers/administrators and disseminated the common tasks to be included in the portfolios: one each in mathematics, writing and reading. On February 12-23, 2001, the ADE and Data Recognition Corporation personnel trained Test Coordinators in the administration of the spring Criterion-Referenced Test. This was provided in 20 sessions at 10 regional sites. Testing protocol, released items, and other testing materials were presented and discussed. The sessions provided training for Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy, Algebra and Geometry Pilot Tests. The LRSD had 2 in attendance for the End of Course session and 2 for the Benchmark session. The NLRSD had 1 in attendance for the End of Course session and 1 for the Benchmark session. The PCSSD had 1 in attendance for the End of Course session and 1 for the Benchmark session. 55 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued} F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) On March 15, 2001, there . was a meeting at the ADE to plan professional development for staff who work with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) students. A $30,000 grant has been created to provide LEP training at Chicot Elementary for a year, starting in April 2001. A $40,000 grant was created to provide a Summer English as Second Language (ESL) Academy for the LRSD from June 18 through 29, 2001. Andre Guerrero from the ADE Accountability section met with Karen Broadnax, ESL Coordinator at LRSD, Pat Price, Early Childhood Curriculum Supervisor at LRSD, and Jane Harkey, Principal of Chicot Elementary. On March 1-2 and 8-29, 2001, ADE staff performed the following activities: processed registration for April 2 and 3 Alternate Portfolio Assessment video conference quarterly meeting\nanswered questions about Individualized Educational Plan (IEP) and LEP Alternate Portfolio Assessment by phone from schools and Education Service Cooperatives\nand signed up students for alternate portfolio assessment from school districts. On March 6, 2001, ADE staff attended a Smart Step Technology Leadership Conference at the State House Convention Center. On March 7, 2001, ADE staff attended a National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Regional Math Framework Meeting about the Consensus Project 2004. On March 8, 2001, there was a one-on-one conference with Carole Villarreal from Pulaski County at the ADE about the LEP students with portfolios. She was given pertinent data, including all the materials that have been given out at the video conferences. The conference lasted for at least an hour. On March 14, 2001, a Test Administrator's Training Session was presented specifically to LRSD Test Coordinators and Principals. About 60 LRSD personnel attended. The following meetings have been conducted with educators in the three districts in Pulaski County since July 2000. On July 10-13, 2000 the ADE provided Smart Step training. The sessions covered Standards-based classroom practices. 56 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) On July 19-21, 2000 the AD!= held the Math/Science Leadership Conference at UCA. This provided services for Arkansas math and science teachers to support systemic reform in math/science and training for 8th grade Benchmark. There were 200 teachers from across the state in attendance. On August 14-31, 2000 the ADE presented Science Smart Start Lessons and worked with teachers to produce curriculum. This will provide K-6 teachers with activity-oriented science lessons that incorporate reading, writing, and mathematics skills. On September 5, 2000 the ADE held an Eisenhower Informational meeting with Teacher Center Coordinators. The purpose of the Eisenhower Professional Development Program is to prepare teachers, school staff, and administrators to help all students meet challenging standards in the core academic subjects. A summary of the program was presented at the meeting. On November 2-3, 2000 the ADE held the Arkansas Conference on Teaching. This presented curriculum and activity workshops. More than 1200 attended the conference. On November 6, 2000 there was a review of Science Benchmarks and sample model curriculum. A committee of 6 reviewed and revised a drafted document. The committee was made up of ADE and K-8 teachers. On November 7-10, 2000 the ADE held a meeting of the Benchmark and End of Course Mathematics Content Area Committee. Classroom teachers reviewed items for grades 4, 6, 8 and EOC mathematics assessment. There were 60 participants. On December 4-8, 2000 the ADE conducted grades 4 and 8 Benchmark Scoring for Writing Assessment. This professional development was attended by approximately 750 teachers. On December 8, 2000 the ADE conducted Rubric development for Special Education Portfolio scoring. This was a meeting with special education supervisors to revise rubric and plan for scoring in June. On December 8, 2000 the ADE presented the Transition Mathematics Pilot Training Workshop. This provided follow-up training and activities for fourth-year mathematics professional development. On December 12, 2000 the ADE presented test administrators training for midyear End of Course (Pilot) Algebra I and Geometry exams. This was provided for schools with block scheduling. 57 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) The ADE provided training .on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems for Special Education and Limited English Proficient students through teleconference broadcasts on April 2-3, 2001. Administration of the Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy took place on April 23-27, 2001. Administration of the End of Course Algebra and Geometry Exams took place on May 2-3, 2001. Over 1,100 Arkansas educators attended the Smart Step Growing Smarter Conference on July 10 and 11, 2001, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center. Smart Step focuses on improving student achievement for Grades 5-8. The Smart Step effort seeks to provide intense professional development for teachers and administrators at the middle school level, as well as additional materials and assistance to the state's middle school teachers. The event began with opening remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. Carl Boyd, a longtime educator and staff consultant for Learning 24-7, presented the first keynote address on \"The Character-Centered Teacher\". Debra Pickering, an education consultant from Denver, Colorado, presented the second keynote address on \"Characteristics of Middle Level Education\". Throughout the Smart Step conference, educators attended breakout sessions that were grade-specific and curriculum area-specific. Pat Davenport, an education consultant from Houston, Texas, delivered two addresses. She spoke on \"A Blueprint for Raising Student Achievement\". Representatives from all three districts in Pulaski County attended. Over 1,200 Arkansas teachers and administrators attended the Smart Start Conference on July 12, 2001, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center. Smart Start is a standards-driven educational initiative which emphasizes the articulation of clear standards for student achievement and accurate measures of progress against those standards through assessments, staff development and individual school accountability. The Smart Start Initiative focused on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. The event began with opening remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. Carl Boyd, a longtime educator and staff consultant for Learning 24-7, presented the keynote address. The day featured a series of 15 breakout sessions on best classroom practices. Representatives from all three districts in Pulaski County attended. On July 18-20, 2001, the ADE held the Math/Science Leadership Conference at UCA. This provided services for Arkansas math and science teachers to support systemic reform in math/science and training for 8th grade Benchmark. There were approximately 300 teachers from across the state in attendance. 58 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of July 31, 2007 (Continued) The ADE and Harcourt Educational Measurement conducted Stanford\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_665","title":"Meeting schedules","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1996/2000"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","School boards","Meetings","Educational planning"],"dcterms_title":["Meeting schedules"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/665"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n******************************************************************************************* LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS January, 1997 SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS DATE-TIME MEEIIKG PLACE Wednesday- 1 Winter Vacation Schools \u0026amp; Administration Closed Thursday- 2 Winter Vacation Schools Closed (Administration Offices Open) Friday-3 Monday- 6 No Meeting Scheduled Classes Resume Tuesday-7 6:00 p.m. - LRSD Biracial Committee Board Room Wednesday- 8 8:30 a.m. - 3:30 p.m. English Department Visitation Southwest Jr. 4:00 p.m. - Drug Free Schools Advisory Council Board Room 4:00 p.m. - Super Saturday Planning Session IRC 4:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. Parents/Community on Your Side IRC *******************************************************************************************December DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Thursday- 9 10:00 a.m. AR National Association of PIE Chamber 5:00 p.m. - Agenda Meeting Board Room Friday-10 10:00 a.m. - Partners in Education Tri-District Committee Chamber Saturday-11 Super Saturday Parent Training IRC Monday- 13 11:30 a.m. - VIPS Executive Committee Board Room Tuesday- 14 9:00 a.m. - SAT-9 Test Interpretation Elementary Principals Board Room 2:00 p.m. - SAT-9 Test Interpretation Secondary Principals Board Room 4:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. Bulletin Board Magic w/Printshop Deluxe Ensemble II IRC 4:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. I Think Im Having Stress 4:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. Cooperative Team Learning IRC******ili** Wili**********ilt** A*** ******** ******* A******* ***********1^**** **************** A A A* December page 3 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Wednesday-15 8:00 a.m. - 3:30 p.m. Paraprofessional Inservice 8:30 a.m. - 3:30 p.m. English Department Visitation Parkview Lecture Hall Mann Magnet 8:30 a.m. - 3:30 p.m. Jr. High Science \u0026amp; Health Teachers IRC 1:00 p.m. - Secondary Counselors Inservice Metropolitan 4:00 p.m. - Super Saturday Planning Session IRC Thursday- 16 3:45- Transition/Annual Review IRC 4:00 p.m. - Student Assignment Appeals Committee SAO 4:15 p.m. - 5:15 p.m. Foreign Languages Council IRC Friday-17 8:30 a.m. - 2:30 p.m. Elementary Counselors Insen'ice King Elem. ***************************************************************************^*************** Monday- 20 No Meeting Scheduled Tuesday- 21 Wednesday- 22 No Meeting Scheduled 4:00 p.m. - Super Saturday Planning Session IRC *******************************************************************************************December page 4 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Thursday- 23 6:00 p.m. - Board Meeting Board Room Friday- 24 8:00 a.m. - 2:30 p.m. Group D - Gifted and Talented Specialists IRC Saturday - 25 9:00 a.m. - Super Saturday Parent Training IRC ******************************************************************************************* Monday- 27 11:30 a.m - VIPS Chairpersons Appreciation Luncheon Adislt Center 1:30 p.m. - General Principals Meeting Board Room 4:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. Tuesday- 28 Polaroid Workshop (Materials Fee is S15.00) IRC 2:30 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. Positiye Parental Relations IRC 4:15 p.m. - Gifted \u0026amp; Talented Council Hall Wednesday- 29 Thursday- 30 No Meeting Scheduled 4:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. TESA for New Teachers IRC r riday- 31 8:00 a.m. - 2:30 p.m. Group E - Gifted \u0026amp; Talented Specialists IRC ******************************************************************************************4 '01/06/97 13:56 Q301 324 2023 I.RSD COlBIfMCATl -\u0026gt; GDM @001 001 Little Rock School District Correction January 6, 1997 For more information: Zeomee Herts, 324-2020 Following is a correction for the Media Advisory released earlier today: Thursday. January 9. 5:00 p.m. The LRSD Board of Directors holds its monthly agenda meeting Franklin Communications and Technology' Incentive Elementary, 1701 S. Harrison. n It Ji I I fir TT TTTr NOTE TO MEDLA: All LRSD Board members receive this advisory' and may choose to attend these events. A Special Board Meeting situation may occur if two board members are in attendance at an event. Some events listed above are subject to change. A ! si ' ' (23/97 14:14 'ifll 324 202.3 i.Rsn co'iMCMCATi onj 002/002 I5f Little Rock School District Special Board Meering ?- k?'r For immediate Release Jamiary 23,1996 hi'- For more information: Suelicu Vann, 324-2020 The Little Rook School District (LRSD) Board of Di_'.ctors will visit icforTnally with area legislators at a reception this aftemooDi prior to the Boards monthly meeting. H If: k I? z I The reception for legislators will be held at 5:00 p.m. in the Board Room of the LRSD Administration Building, 810 West Markham. The monthly Board meeting will begin at 6\n00p,ra. .L \u0026lt; 1w/ TTr rrr T 1 1 IB7r' r I- 'J L 810 West Markham Street Uttle Roch, Arkansas 72201 (501)324-2000 5 la III 31 '97 10:11 501 324 2023 i.Rsn coMMi \\ic vri - , Ol)i| @002/002 Si r I *****************************************************************************************J,* LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS RECEIVE' March, 1997 FES 3 - 1997 DATE-TIME SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS MEETING office OF PLACE Monday- 3 4:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. PET 3:30 p.m. - 6:30 p.m. Managing the Aggressive Student IRC Tuesday- 4 4:15 p.m. - 5:30 p.m. Secondary Social Studies Council IRC 6:00 p.m. - Biracial Advisory Committee Board Room Wednesday- 5 8:00 a.m. - 3:30 p.m. Special Education Paraprofessionals Board Room Thursday- 6 4:30 p.m. - 7:30 p.m. Children w/Asthma IRC Friday- 7 No Meetings Scheduled Saturday-8 2:00 p.m. - Parent Involvement Day 1st. Comm. Bank/ Capitol \u0026amp; BroadwayMarch page 2 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Monday- 10 11:30 a.m. - VIPS Board of Directors Board Room Tuesday- 11 8:00 a.m. - (Tentative date) Partners Idea Exchange TBA 1:00 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. School Nurse StafCTnservice How to Plan A Health Fair TBA 4:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. Bulletin Board Magic IRC 4:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. Grant Writing IRC Wednesday-12 No Meetings Scheduled Thursday- 13 5:00 p.m. Board Agenda Meeting Board Room Friday- 14 Teachers Workday (Students Out) 8:30 a.m. - 3:30 p.m. Pre-K Instructional Aides CD A Training IRC 1 t******************************************************************************************* March page 3 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Monday- 17 Spring Break Tuesday- 18 Spring Break Wednesday-19 Spring Break Thursday- 20 Spring Break Friday- 21 Spring Break Administration Offices Closed Monday- 24 No Meetings Scheduled Tuesday- 25 3:15 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Pre-K Teachers Early Childhood Education IRC 4:15 p.m. - Gifted and Talented Council Hall High Wednesday- 26 No Meetings Scheduled* * * * ** * itik * it ** W.* it-it * tk *** *if'it 'k is ** * * 4t icit it */( * ile it * 'k :if 'k * * is 'k * 'k * 'it 'k'k -k -k * * it -k * -it it * it tfe /( -it * \"it * -k it * * * * * March page 4 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Thursday- 27 5:30 p.m. - 7:30 p.m. Early Childhood Education Parent Workshops King 6:00 p.m. - Board Meeting Board Room Friday- 28 Parent Conference Day (Students Out) Monday- 31 4:15 p.m. - 5:30 p.m. Secondary Social Studies Council IRC5 ' ' J LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS RECEfl'BP February, 1997 SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS OmCEOF it iHr A ifc A A ifc A W A ilr A :j\u0026lt;r A * ilr it A A A A A A A A A W A A ilc it it A A A i\u0026gt;r A A A A A ilr A ilr A A A A it ilr ilr A i\u0026lt;e ilr A A PATE-TIME MEETING PLACE '\"\"fB 5 - 1937 Monday- 3 t/ 4:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. PET IRC 1:00 p.m. -3:30 p.m. School Nurse Staff /Inservice How to Deal with Behavior Disorders in Children, Anger Centered TBA Tuesday- 4 1:30 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. Pre-K Instructional Aides CDA Training IRC 1:30 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. Cluster A- Kindergarten Teachers Behavior Management King 1:45 p.m. - 3:45 p.m. Reading Dept. Writing and the Young Child 1st. Grade TeachersfTargeted Schools) Chicot Media 2:45 p.m. - 4:45 p.m. Secondary English Teachers TBA 2:45 p.m. - 4:45 p.m. Foreign Languages Teachers TBA 4:00 p.m. - Secondary Special Education Issues Hall High Media Cntr. 6:00 p.m. - Biracial Advisory Committee Board RoomV February page 2 DATE-TIME MEETING ELACE Wednesday- 5 12:30 p.m, - 3:30 p.m. UALR Pre Pros Early Childhood Education IRC Thursday- 6 2:00 p.m. - Parent Involvement Admin. Team HIPPY 2:00 p.m. - 3:00 p.m. ESL Tutors IRC 4:15 p.m. - 5:30 p.m. Seeondary Social Studies Council IRC Friday- 7 8:00 a.m. - 2:30 p.m. Gifted Specialists Group F IRC Rm. 19 10:00 a.m. - Tri-District Partners Meeting Chamber of Commerce Saturday- 8 9:00 a.m. - Super Saturday Parent Training IRC it * * W * it * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 4e * * is 4c -it it it -k * Jr it it it * it it it it -k -k it -it Tk * * * * * it it it * * k * -k -it * * * * it -k ik * it -k -k ik 'it ick-it Monday- 10 11:30 a.m. - VIPS Executive Committee Board Room Tuesday-11 11:30 a.m. - PTA Founders Day Luncheon Pul. Hgts. Methodist Church) ' February pageJ DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Wednesday-12 No Meetings Scheduled Thursday- 13 5:00 p.m. - Board Agenda Meeting Board Room Friday-14 No Meetings Scheduled Monday-17 4:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m PET IRC 4:15 p.m. - 5:15 p.m. Secondary English council IRC Tuesday- 18 3:15 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Pre-K Teachers Agenda for Fire Safety Education Activities IRC 4:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. Positive Discipline IRC Wednesday-19 8:00 a.m. - 3:30 p.m. Special Education Paraprofessionals Parkview Media Cntr. 8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. AGATE Conference DoubleTree Hotel Thursday- 20 8:00 a.m. - 9:00 p.m. AGATE Conference 8:30 a.m. - 11:30 a.m. Elementary Librarians (B-K schools) DoubleTree Hotel IRCFebruary page 4 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE 12:30 p.m. -3:30 p.m. Elementary Librarians (M-W schools) IRC 3:45 p.m. - Special Education Discipline Separate Prog. Issues IRC 4:00 p.m. - Student Assignment Appeals Committee SAO 4:15 p.m. - 5:15 p.m. Foreign Languages Council IRC Friday- 21 8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. AGATE Conference DoubleTree Hotel Saturday- 22 9:00 a.m. - Super Saturday Parent Training IRC Monday- 24 1:30 p.m. General Principals Meeting Board Room Tuesday-25 4:15 p.m. - Gifted and Talented Council Hall High Wednesday- 26 No Meetings Scheduled Thursday- 27 6:00 p.m. - Board Meeting Board Room Friday- 28 No Meetings Scheduled********************************************************************J^J^*J^******J^************ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS April, 1997 SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS **************************************************************************j.**j^************* DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Tuesday - 1 Early Dismissal 5:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. Mahlon Martin Professional Development Program IRC 6:00 p.m. - LRSD Biracial Meeting Board Room Wednesday - 2 8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. SAFAK Training Thursday - 3 St. Paul U. Methodist 8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. SAFAK Training St. Paul U. Methodist 2:00 p.m. - 3:00 p.m. ESL Tutors IRC 4:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. SECME Steering Committee Board Room 6:30 p.m. - LRAEOP Bosses Night Gibbs Cafetorium Friday - 4 8:00 a.m. - Saturday - 5 Strategy 7 Stair Development IRC 9:00 a.m. - Super Saturday Parent Training IRCApril, 1997 page! DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Monday - 7 No Meetings Scheduled Tuesday - 8 Custodians Appreciation Day 8:15 a.ni. - 3:00 p.m. Australian Mathematics Workshop IRC 11:30 a.m. - 3:30 p.m. Secondary Counselors Meeting PARK Cntr. Gey.Spgs. Rd. 5:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. Mahlon Martin Professional Deyelopment Program IRC Wednesday - 9 No Meetings Scheduled Thursday -10 5:00 p.m. - Board Agenda Meeting Board Room Friday -11 8:00 a.m. - Strategy 7 Staff Deyelopment IRC 8:30 a.m. - 2:30 p.m. Elementary Counselors Meeting Geyer Spgs. Elementary Monday - 14 4:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. PET IRC * * ** * * *** * * * it-it * * ** * * ** * A * ** -k * * ie it it -k ** -k -k * * it * ifrit * /( * irir k-k * ** -k * * ik * * * * * -it * * * it -k * * -it * * * ie * * *April, 1997 page 3 DATE - TIME MEETING PLACE Tuesday -15 1:00 p.m. - Strategy 3 Board Room 4:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. Bulletin Board Magic w/Printshop Deluxe IRC 5:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. Mahlon Martin Professional Development Program IRC 6:00 p.m. - 8:30 p.m. SECME Multicultural Extravaganza Ricks Armory Wednesday -16 Bus Drivers Appreciation Day Thursday- 17 3:45 p.m. - Residential/Day Treatment Referrals IRC 4:00 p.m. - Appeals Committee Meeting SAO 4:15 p.m. - 5:15 Foreign Languages Council IRC Friday- 18 Saturday-19 No Meetings Scheduled 9:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. Mahlon Martin Professional Development Program IRC *************************************************************************j^***j^***j[****j^****April, 1997 page 4 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Monday - 21 Beginning of National Secretaries Week 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Cardiac Pulmonary Resuscitation for Nurses (Each nurse will attend 4 hrs.) TBA 4:15 p.m. - 5:15 p.m. English Council IRC Tuesday- 22 8:00 a.m. - 2:15 p.m. Quiz Bowl - Elem. Diy. I (Preliminary Round) Western Hills 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Cardiac Pulmonary Resuscitation for Nurses (Each nurse will attend 4 hrs.) TBA 4:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. PET IRC 4:15 p.m. - G/T Council Hall 4:15 p.m. - 5:15 p.m. Math Council Meeting IRC 5:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. Mahlon Martin Professional Deyelopment Program IRC Wednesday- 23 National Secretaries Day 8:00 a.m. - 2:15 p.m. Quiz Bowl - Elem. Diy. II (Preliminary Round) Western Hills 12:30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m. Title I Meeting IRC 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Cardiac Pulmonary Resuscitation for Nurses (Each nurse will attend 4 hrs.) TBA 8:30 a.m. - 3:45 p.m. Project Alert Training MetropolitanApril, 1997 page 5 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Thursday- 24 8:00 a.m. - 2:15 p.m. Quiz Bowl - Jr. High (Preliminary Round) Western Hills 4:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. TESA IRC 6:00 p.m. - Board Meeting Board Room Friday- 25 8:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Connected Math Project IRC Saturday- 26 8:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Connected Math Project IRC Monday- 28 1:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m. General Principals Meeting Board Room Tuesday - 29 9:00 a.m. -1:00 p.m. Job Fair-12' Grade Woodys Sher. Forest 10:00 a.m. - 12:00 Noon Title I Para- Professionals IRC 5:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. Mahlon Martin Professional Deyelopment Program IRC****j**j\u0026lt;2*j**j**\u0026lt;2^***j2'2t***i^^ April, 1997 page 6 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Wednesday - 30 1:00 p.m. - 3:00 p.m. Truancy Review Board Board Room 1:00 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. HIV- AIDS in Elem. School Setting TBA 4:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. Secondary Textbook Adoption Committee IRCRECBVED LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MAY 81997 May, 1997 OFFICE OF DATE-TIME SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS MEETING PLACE Thursday- 1 2:00p.m. - ESL Tutors IRC 4:00p.m, - 5:00p.m. SECME Steering Committee Board Room 4:30p.m - LRAEOP Meeting IRC-Room 19 Friday- 2 8:00 a,m - 4:00p.m Word Workshop IRC Lab 8:30 a.m - 2:30 p.m Elementary Counselors Inservice Romine Saturday- 3 9:00 a.m - 4:00p.m Mahlon Martin Professional Development Program McClellan 11:00 a.m -1:00p.m Parent Advisory Awards Picnic McArthur Park Monday- 5 4:00p.m - 9:00p.m PET IRC 6:30p.m - 8:30p.m SECME Awards Banquet UALRMay page 2 Tuesday- 6 Early Dismissal 8:00 a.m. - 3:30p.m. Elementary Quiz Bowl Finals Hall High 1:30 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. Pre-K Instructional A ides CDA Class IRC 1:30 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. Kindergarten Teachers Inservice IRC Cluster C 5:00p.m. - 9:00p.m. Mahlon Martin Professional Development Program IRC 6:0 0 p.m. - Bi-Racial Committee Board Room Wednesday- 7 8:00 a.m. - 3:30 p.m. Elementary Bowl Finals Hall High Thursday- 8 8:00 a.m. - 3:30p.m. Jr. High Quiz Bowl Finals Hall High 8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. Excel Workshop IRC Lab 5:00 p.m. - Board Agenda Meeting Board Room Friday- 9 No Meetings Scheduled ******************************************************************************************* Monday- 12 4:00p.m. - 7:00p.m. Grant Writing IRC******************************************************************************************* A/iflj paged Tuesday- 13 No Meetings Scheduled Wednesday- 14 No Meetings Scheduled Thursday-15 4:00 p.m. - Student Assignment Appeals Committee SAO 4:15p.m. - 5:15p.m Foreign Languages Council IRC Friday- 16 No Meetings Scheduled Saturday- 17 9:00 a.m -11:00 a.m Super Saturday Parent Advisory Committee IRC Monday-19 1:30 p.m - General Principals Meeting Board Room 4:00p.m - 9:00p.m PET IRC 4:15p.m - 5:15p.m English Council IRC Tuesday- 20 8:00 a.m - 4:00p.m Access Workshop IRC Lab 3:15p.m - 4:30p.m Pre-K Teachers Inservice IRCMay paged Wednesday- 21 8:30 a.m, -1:45p.m. \u0026lt;/* Grade Challenge Parkview Thursday- 22 8:00 a.m. - 4:00p.m. PowerPoint Workshop IRC Lab 8:30 a.m. -1:45p.m. Grade Challenge Parkview 2:00 p.m, - Annual Reports TBA 4:00p.m. - 9:00 p.m. TESA IRC Lab 6:00 p.m. - Regular Board Meeting Board Room Friday- 23 No Meetings Scheduled Monday- 26 Memorial Holiday Schools and Administration Closed Tuesday-27 5:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. Wednesday- 28 Mahlon Martin Professional Development Program IRC Thursday- 29 Friday- 30 10:00 a.m. -1:00 p.m. No Meetings Scheduled No Meetings Scheduled VIPS Mentor Picnic Murray Park*********************************************************************** * LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS JUN 4 _ iggy June, 1997 OFFICE OF desegregation MONITOflINQ SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS ******************************************************************************************* DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Monday- 2 4:00p.m. - VIPS Board of Directors Board Room Tuesday- 3 6:00 p.m. - LRSD Biracial Committee Board Room Wednesday- 4 Last Day for Students Thursday - 5 8:00 a.m. - Noon School Nurses Annex Friday- 6 Last Day for Teachers 7:45 a.m. - 9:30 a.m. Soc. Studies Textbook Inservice (Cluster ASchools) Philander Smith College (Titus Acad. Center) 8:30 a.m. - Math Council Parkview 9:45 a.m. -11:30 a.m. Soc. Studies Textbook Inservice (Cluster BSchools) Philander Smith College (Titus Acad. Center) 11:30 a.m. - S'' Grade Calculator Training IRC ******************************************************* *W**Wilf**W*T^r*WW******** June page! DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Monday- 9 No Meetings Scheduled Tuesday-lO 8:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. Summer School Registration Forest Hgts., Hall High 5:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. Mahlon Martin Professional Dev. Program IRC Wednesday-11 8:00 a.m. - 3:00p.m. Summer School Registration Forest Hgts., Hall High Thursday-12 10:00 a.m. - Tri-District Partners Meeting Chamber 5:00 p.m. - Board Agenda Meeting Board Room Admin. Bldg. Friday-13 8:30 a.m. - 3:30p.m. K-3 Summer School Teachers Inservice IRC 9:00 a.m. - 4:00p.m Mahlon Martin Professional Dev. Program M.L.King it it it it it it it it It it'k it it it-k-k Ie \"k-it-k it it it it it it it Ie \"it it-it ie Ie it it it it It it Ie-k it It it it it'it it'k it it it it it it it ie ie ie if ie ie it-it it it it it it it ieie-it it-ie \"it-k-kieie it it it it it ie Ie if it it Ie Monday- 16 7:45 a.m -1:00p.m 1 Day of Summer School Forest Hgts., Hall High 8:30 a.m - Noon Vital Link Internships Tuesday-17 8:30 a.m - Noon Vital Link Internships\u0026lt; ******************************************************************************************* June page 3 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Wednesday-18 8:30 a.m. - Noon Vital Link Internships Thursday-19 8:30 a.m. - Noon Vital Link Internships 4:00 p.m. - Student Assignment Appeab Committee SAO Friday- 20 8:30 a.m. - Noon Vital Link Internships ******************************************************************************************* Monday- 23 8:30 a.m. - Noon Vital Link Internships Tuesday- 24 8:30 a.m. - Noon Vital Link Internships Wednesday- 25 8:30 a.m. - Noon Vital Link Internships Thursday- 26 8:30 a.m. - Noon Vital Link Internships 6:00p.m. - Board Meeting Board Room Admin. Bldg. Friday-27 8:30 a.m. - Noon Vital Link Internships *******************************************************************************************\u0026gt; ******************************************************************************************* June paee 4 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Monday- 30 No Meetings Scheduled 07 Ma''?!\" 10: 32 SOJ 524 2023 LRSt) COMMOICATI ODM 002'002 I Llttk^ Kock School District Special Board M.eerinf For (mraediak- Release i|-- I For more mformation: Snellen Vann, 324-2020 I be Lirtle kock School kistrict (LRSD) Bo\nTd of Duectors will bold a special a -Ct tag tomorrow afternoon m conjur.'Ttiun with its regular agenda msehaE. The special M to di: :uss the sup^sriutcndents conmaci xid the proposed bcdger for Oon. ' 'ii I ke meetings will oegin :n. 5\nCCt p.m. on Inursday. Jtily 10. T^qp Ll:e iscorn ot tbe LRSD Administra: r B ildi . ti vVe.si Matkhar'. J MEDL-\\ \u0026gt;OT: 1 ohciwiijg i,L XDj'kS r- \"T-inbers aqd .Dr, Leshe Cami.ne have been in med to Lciaid m- -jcr J L_ :\nss diane 708 FLT.l Dnve) A special meeting Sit'j.-jon e :r. tn-7 \u0026lt;^ii? Board member anends h:\n?. tjoii. sto West Majurtairt Street Lierle Rock, Aikansas 72j\nui (501)324-2000 ******************************************************************************************* LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS July, 1997 SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Tuesday-1 No Meetings Scheduled Wednesday-2 No Meetings Scheduled Thursday- 3 No Meetings Scheduled Friday- 4 INDEPENDENCE DA Y HOLIDA Y Administration Offices Closed ****************************************************************************************** Monday- 7 No Meetings Scheduled Tuesday- 8 9:00 a.m. - 4:00p.m. Excel Computer Class IRC Wednesday- 9 9:00 a.m. - 4:00p.m. Windows 95 IRC\u0026lt; ******************************************************************************************* July page? Thursday-10 9:00 o-m. - 4:00 p.m. PowerPoint IRC 5:00 p.m. - Board Agenda Meeting Board Room Friday-11 No Meetings Scheduled ****************************************************************************************** Monday-14 8:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. Principals Meeting Adult Cntr. Tuesday-15 No Meetings Scheduled Wednesday- 16 2:30p,m. - 4:00p.m. Principals Retreat Clarion Resort Hot Springs Thursday-17 7:00 a.m. - 8:00 a.m. 4:00 p.m. - (Registration begins at 2:30 p.m.) Principals Retreat Clarion Resort Hot Springs Student Assignment Appeals Committee SAO Friday- 18 7:00 a.m. - 8:00 a.m. Principals Retreat Clarion Resort Hot Springs (Institute ends at 3:00p.m.) *******************************************************************************************1 kititititititititititititititititititititiritititititititirititititititititititititititititititititieititiritieitititititititittititititititititieititititititititititieitititieieit JuTv pagej Monday- 21 No Meetings Scheduled Tuesday- 22 No Meetings Scheduled Wednesday- 23 8:30 a.m. -12:00 Noon School Start-Up Information Board Room 12:00 - 3:00p.m. New Principals Meeting Board Room Thursday- 24 6:00p.m. - Board Meeting Board Room Friday- 25 No Meetings Scheduled it it it it it it it it it it it it It it it it it it-it it it it it it it it it it it it it it it \"it it it it it-k it it it it it it it 1t it It It It it it it it it It it it \"it it it it it it-kit It it-it it it It-it it it it'k'it it it it \"kit-kit it it-k-kit Monday- 28 No Meetings Scheduled Tuesday- 29 No Meetings Scheduled Wednesday- 30 No Meetings Scheduled Thursday- 31 No Meetings ScheduledJ** 13:40 'S-'OI 324 2023 I..RSI' COMltl'MCATI ODM 002 002 R Scboo) uistiik \u0026gt;\u0026lt;: vrni ,1 O:-- T Th 2c\nini 1,51 i'. Disnict (LRSD) Boar-J / 'ors will hoi . ilie mee^iEg mil be held to di-,^uL\u0026gt;., a resolution J.CV .1 elecho'i , uder state law, it'only one candidate petiti ho o' b'-ord position, the elecnon commission may be asked to limit the number 1 A I. Tr:'! le school noara seats up forelection next month are 2 Wl-: :OCt p.m. in the Board Room of the LRSD Fill' s' m ' )! ******************************************************************************************* LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS August, 1997 SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS ******************************************************************************************* DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Friday-1 No Meetings Scheduled ******************************************************************************************* Monday- 4 8:30-4:30 Pre-School Conference- Leadership at the Middle Level Principals/Asst Principals PHJH,CJH, FHJH, SW, Mabelvale Jr. PH United Methodist Church Tuesday- 5 8:00-4:00 School Legal Institute AU Principals St James Methodist Church 8:30-3:30 Pre-School Conference- Leadership at the Middle Level Team Leaders, Steering Comm. Chairs, Dept ChairsFHJH, CJH, PHJH, SW, Mabelvale Jr. Board Room Wednesday- 6 8:30-3:30 Pre-School Conference - New Teacher Middle Level Orientation University Park Adult Center 10:00- 7:00 School Check - In (Registration) AU Schools Thursday- 7 10:00- 7:00 School Check - In (Registration) AU Schools******************************************************************************************* August page 2 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Friday- S through Aue. 14 8:30-4:00 Summer Institute - Middle Level Cloverdale, Forest Heights Local Schools 9:00-11:00 Junior High Word Processing Teachers Metro ******************************************************************************************* Monday-11, through Wednesday 13 8:00-4:00 AR Vocational Association State Conference Excelsior 8:30- New Futures Middle Level Summer Institute Mabelvale Jr. 8:30- New Futures Middle Level Summer Institute SouthwestJr. 8:30- New Futures Middle Level Summer Institute PHJH 8:30-12:00 New Librarians Winnebago Training IRC 1:00-3:30 Elementary LibrariatK IRC 8:00-11:30 Substitute Teachers Board Room Tuesday-12 8:00-4:00 AR Vocational Association State Conference Excelsior 8:30-11:30 New Teachers - Elementary IRC 12:30-3:30 New Teachers - Secondary IRC Wednesday- 13 8:30-3:00 Adult Education Teachers Adult Ed. Center 8:30-3:00 HIPPY Coordinators IRC******************************************************************************************* Aueust page 3 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE 11:30-12:30 DriU Team, Cheerleaders, Dance Team Pep Club Sponsors/Coaches McClellan 12:00-3:30 PreSchool Gifted and Talented Facilitators Hall High 12:30-2:00 All Junior High Language Arts Plus Teachers IRC,Rm.l8 1:00-2:30 Volleyball Coaches Conf. Room 1:00 -3:00 All Theme/Curr. And Subject Area IRCfiin.19 1:00-3:00 Title I Spec. King 1:00-3:30 Sec. Counselors Ins. Workshop Board Room 2:15-3:45 AU Sr. High Language Arts Plus Teachers IRCJlm.18 3:30- Safe \u0026amp; Drug Free Schools \u0026amp; Comm. Advisory Council Board Room Thursday -14 8:00-9:30 Social Studies Inservice - Grade 6 Cluster A Teachers, Resource Teachers Romine 8:00-10:00 Social Studies Insevice - K-5 Cluster 1 Teachers, Resource Teachers K-1 WiUiams 2-3 Washington 4-5 King 8:00 -12:00 Elem. Counselors Ins. Workshop Board Room 8:30-3:00 Adult Education Teachers Adult Ed. Center******************************************************************************************* Aueust paee 4 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE 8:30-3:00 Title I SFA New Schools/Mitchell,Brady, Fair Park), 2^ Year Schools w/newK-3 teachers\nteachers moved to new grades, Teachers/schools adding grade 3-6 Wakefield 8:30-3:30 Elementary Speech Teachers/ All Self-Contained J^. Fair 8:30-11:00 Secondary Science Teachers Parkview Science Wing 8:30-3:30 Jr. High Social Studies Teachers All Resource Teachers Henderson 8:30-3:30 Sr. High Social Studies Teachers All Resource Teachers Parkview S:30 -3:00 Pre-School- Gifted \u0026amp; Talented Facilitator Western HOk 10:00-11:30 Social Studies Inservice, Grade 6 Cluster B Teachers, Resource Teachers Romine 10:00-3:00 Pre-K Teachers and HIPPY Staff Jacksonville Comm. Center 10:15-12:15 Social Studies Inservice, K-5 Cluster 2 Teachers, Resource Teachers K-1 Williams 2-3 Washington 4-5 King 11:30-1:00 Key Communicators (PR Coordinators) University Park Adult Center 12:30-3:00 7-12 math Teachers 1:00-3:00 Secondary Librarians Parkview Math Wing IRC******************************************************************************************* August page 5 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE 1:15-3:15 Social Studies Inservice K-5 Cluster 3 Teachers, Resources Teachers K-1 WiUiams 2-3 Washington 4-5 King 5:00 - Board Agenda Meeting Board Room Friday-15 8:00-12:00 All Vocational Education Teachers Metro 8:30-3:00 SFA New Schools- 2^ year schools w/new teachers\nteachers moved to new grades, Teachers/schools adding grades 3-6 Wakefield 8:30-3:00 CCC Lab Attendants Rightsell ******************************************************************************************* Monday-18 8:30-11:30 New Instructional Aides IRC 8:30-3:00 SFA Tutors/facilitators :til new schools\n2^ year schools - new tutors/facilitators Romine 12:00- CTA Luncheon for New Teachers AEA Bldg. Tuesday-19 8:30-11:30 New Supervision Aides IRC Wednesday- 20 First Day of School************ W*WW*W**WWWWW4r*4r**irirWirir**Wir\u0026lt;r1lrir1lrir\u0026lt;rWW*1lr*****irWirirW***ir**4r*******4r*******irW**W**W*ir August page 6 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Thursday- 21 Friday- 22 No Meetings Scheduled 11:30- VIPS Chairpersons Orientation Board Room ******************************************************************************************* Monday- 25 1:30 p.m. - Principals Meeting Board Room Tuesday- 26 5:00 - 8:00 Wednesday- 27 Fall Semester Registration Evening High School Metro 9:00- VIPS Chairpersons Orientation Board Room 4:00- PAC Executive Board IRC Thursday- 28 6:00- Board Meeting Board Room Friday- 29 No Meetings Scheduled September- 2 5:00-9:15 Classes Begin Evening High School Metro******************************************************************************************* Received 1 1997 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLEROCK, ARKANSAS OFFICE OF December, 1997 DESEGHESATIQUmiTORINS SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS it'kiiit'ltiiiticitie'k'ifkifkie-ifie'k'k-le-ieifififk-k'k'it'lcieieie-kifitififkieiiii-ie-itie-kifkifttififlt'ie'k'k-kitic'k'ie-kifieitieitifk-itifk-ififit'ifkit'ie'k'kie-kisieitie'ie-kit'k DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Monday- 1 3:30 - 6:30p.m. Technology Trainer Testing IRC Tuesday- 2 All Day- School -Wide Discipline NLR Community Center 12:00- Strategy 5 Team VIPS Office 3:30 - 6:30p.m. Technology Trainer Testing IRC 4:00 - 7:00 p.m Conversational Spanish (Contd. from November) IRC 4:00 - 7:00p.m Polaroid Workshop IRC 6:00 p.m - LRSD Biracial Committee Board Room Wednesday- 3 8:00 - 4:00p.m Windows 95 Workshop (Principals) IRC 4:00p.m - PAC Planning Session IRC Thursday- 4 All Day - IDEA IRC 9:00 - Noon SECMA Team Training McClellan 2:00p.m - ESL Tutors IRCDecember page 2 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Thursday fcontd.) 5:00p.m. - Board Agenda Meeting Board Room Friday- 5 8:30 - 3:00p.m. Gifted \u0026amp; Talented Specialist Inservice IRC Saturday- 6 9:00 a.m. - Super Saturday Parent Training IRC Monday- 8 9:00 - 3:00 p.m. Portfolio Technical Assistance Training ( SECME Coordinators) TBA 4:00 - 7:00p.m. Conversational Spanish (Continued) IRC Tuesday- 9 12:30- Vocational Coordinators Metro 3:00 - 4:30p.m. Pre-K Inservice IRC-Rm.18 Wednesday- 10 All Day- IDEA Board Room 1:30 - 4:00p.m. School Nurse Staff Meeting TBA Thursday-11 8:30-11:30 a.m. Drug Education Curriculum Inservice (Civics Teachers) IRC 12:30 - 3:30p.m. Drug Education Curriculum Inservice (American History Teachers) IRCDecember pane 3 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE 4:00 - 7:00p.m. Domestic/Dating Violence IRC 6:30- LRAEOP Holiday Celebration ML. King Friday-12 8:30 - Noon Elementary Counselors Inservice Booker Elem. Monday-15 11:30- VIPS Board Board Room 1:30 - 5:00p.m. General Principals Meeting Board Room 3:30 - 6:30p.m. Technology Trainer Testing IRC 4:15-5:15 p.m. English Council IRC Tuesday- 16 4:00 - 7:00p.m. Conversational Spanish (Continued) IRC 4:00 - 7:00p.m. Surf the Internet for Thematic Units IRC 4:30p.m. - Student Assignment Appeals Committee SAO Wednesday-17 All Day - IDEA IRC 1:00 - 3:45p.m. Secondary Counselors Inservice Metro Thursday- 18 6:00 p.m.- Board Meeting Board RoomDecember pane 3 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Friday-19 Last Day of School (Winter Vacation Begins) Monday- 22 Winter Vacation/Christmas (Schools and Administrative Offices Closed) Tuesday- 23 Winter Vacation/Christmas (Schools and Administrative Offices Closed) Wednesday- 24 Winter Vacation/Christmas (Schools and Administrative Offices Closed) Thursday- 25 Winter Vacation/Christmas (Schools and Administrative Offices Closed) Friday- 26 Winter Vacation/Christmas (Schools and Administrative Offices Closed) Monday- 29 Winter Vacation/Christmas (Schools and Administrative Offices Closed) Tuesday- 30 Winter Vacation/Christmas (Schools and Administrative Office Closed) Wednesday- 31 Winter Vacation/Christmas (Schools and Administrative Offices Closed) Schools and Administrative Offices will reopen on January 5,1998LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS RECEIVED February, 1998 2 1998 SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS OFICEOF DESEGREGATION MONITORING DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Monday- 2 Pilot - Grade 4 Benchmark Elent. Schools 4:00 7:00 p.m. Surf the Net for Thematic Units IRC Tuesday- 3 Pilot-Grade 4 Benchmark Elem. Schools 8:30 a.m.- Elementary Library Media Specialists IRC r 4:00 - 7:00 p.m. Cooperative Team Learning (second night of course) IRC 6 p.m. - LRSD Biracial Committee Board Room Wednesday-4 Pilot - Grade 4 Benchmark Field Test - Grade 8 Benchmark Elem. Schools Jr. High Schools Thursday- 5 Pilot - Grade 4 Benchmark Elem. Schools 12:00- Reading Initiative (LR Alliance Meeting) Board Room 2:00p.m. - ESL Tutors IRC 3:00 - 5:00 p.m. Elementary Language Arts Textbook Adoption Committee IRCFebruary Pase 2 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Friday- 6 Pilot - Grade 4 Benchmark Elem. Schools 9:00 - Noon SECME Martin Luther King Essay Contest (Oral Presentations) Board Room Saturday- 7 9:00 -12:00 p.m. OM Judges Training Office for Deaf/ Hearing Impaired (212 South Palm) ******************************************************************************************* Monday- 9 Pilot - Grade 4 Benchmark Elem. Schools Tuesday-10 4:15 - 5:30p.m. Secondary Social Studies Council IRC Wednesday-11 No Meeting Scheduled Thursday- 12 8:30 - Noon Elem. Counselors Inservice Board Room 1:00-3:00 p.m. School Nurse Staff/Inservice Assessment of the Ear and Implants (Dr. Charles M. Bower) King Magnet 1:00 - 3:45 p.m. Secondary Counselors Inservice Board Room 5 p.m. - Board Agenda Meeting Board Room Friday- 13 8:00 - 5:00 p.m. Mini AGATE Conference St. Fincent******************************************************************************************* February Pase 3 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Saturday- 14 8:00-12:00 MiniAAGEA Conference (Gifted Learners at Middle Level) St Vincent Monday- 16 11:30-1:00p.m. VIPS Executive Committee Board Room 4:15 - 5:15p.m. English Council IRC Tuesday- 17 8:00 - 3:00 p.m. 3'* Grade Calculator Training IRC 12:00- Strategy 5 Committee VIPS Office 4:00 - 7:00 p.m. National Staff Development Standards IRC 4:30p.m. - Student Assignment Appeals Committee SAO Wednesday-18 8:30 - 3:00 p.m. National Faculty Henderson 12:15 - 3:30 p.m. Special Education on lEPs Board Room Thursday- 19 8:00 - 3:00 p.m. 3^ Grade Calculator Training IRC 8:30 - 3:00 p.m. National Faculty Henderson 4:15 - 5:15 p.m. Foreign Languages Council IRCFebruary Pase 4 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Friday- 20 6:30p.m, - Pulaski County Volunteer Summit Hall High Saturday- 21 8:30 p.m. - Pulaski County Volunteer Summit Hall High Monday- 23 4:00 - 7:00 p.m. Polaroid Workshop IRC Tuesday- 24 1:00 - 3:00 p.m. HIPPY Paraprofessionals Inservice IRC 3:00 - 4:30p.m. Pre-K Teachers Inservice IRC 4:15 p.m. Gifted \u0026amp; Talented Council Hall High Wednesday- 25 No Meeting Scheduled Thursday- 26 8:30 - 3:00 p.m. Vertical Teaming Workshop (Math) IRC 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. Special Education on lEPs Board Room 4:00- 7:00 p.m. Domestic/Dating Violence IRC 6 p.m. - Board Meeting Board Room 6:00 - 8:00 p.m. SECME Multicultural Extravaganza Ricks ArmoryFebruary Pase 5 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Friday- 27 8:30 - 3:30p.m. Pre- K Instructional Aides CDA Class IRC 1:00p.m. - English Vertical Teams Saturday- 28 N.L.R. Hilton Riyerfront 8:00 - 3:00 p.m. English Vertical Teams N.L.R. Hilton Riverfront\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\w^^ R 7 1338 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS OFFiCECF DESEGREGATION MONITORING ^przY, 1998 SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS niiiiHinninnHnnninnniiiiiiiHiinununiHiiniinniiiiiiiHiimiuHniHHimiiiiiinmHuumnmniimnumiimmmminnumimu DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Wednesday- 1 Spring Break (Students Out) Thursday- 2 Spring Break (Students Out) Friday- 3 Spring Break (Students Out) Monday- 6 No Meetings Scheduled Tuesday- 7 6 p.m. - LRSD Biracial Committee Board Room Wednesday- 8 No Meetings Scheduled Thursday- 9 8 - 3:30 p.m. - Computer lEP Training Rockefeller 3-5 p.m. Elem. Language Arts Textbook Adoption Committee IRC 5p.m. - Board Agenda Meeting Board Roomuummummmmmunnmuumummmuunmmuuumnmummmmuuuuunummmuuuuumnuuuununmmmnnmuu April Pase 2 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Friday-10 Staff Deyelopment (Students Out) Monday- 13 All Day CPR Training for Nurses (Everyone must, attend A day) TBA Tuesday- 14 4-7 p.m. Polaroid Workshop IRC All Day CPR Training for Nurses (Eyeryone must attend A day) TBA Wednesday- 15 No Meetings Scheduled Thursday- 16 8-4 p.m. K-3 Summer School Training IRC 4-7 p.m Domestic/Dating Violence IRC 4:15 - 5:30 p.m Foreign Languages Council IRC 6:30p.m - LRAEOP Bosses Night Metro Friday- 17 8-4 p.m K-3 Summer School Training IRC 8:30 a.m - Elementary Librarians Terry ElemuuuiHunninuuunuuuuuunuuumuummuuuumunuumnmmuunummuunuuuummnmmnnmmuuummuummm April Pase 3 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Saturday-18 All Day State OM Competition Sheridan Monday- 20 ACTAP Retest - Grade II 8-4 p.m. K-3 Summer School Training IRC 4:15 - 5:30 p.m. English Council IRC Tuesday- 21 ACTAPRetest- Grade 11 8 - 3:30 p.m. Secondary Language Arts Textbook Adoption Committee IRC 8:30 - 3:00 p.m. LRSD Quiz Bowl Preliminary W. Hills 4:30 p.m. - Appeals Committee SAO Wednesday- 22 ACTAP Retest - Grade 11 8-4 p.m. K-3 Summer School Training IRC 8:30 - 3:00 p.m. LRSD Quiz Bowl Preliminary W. Hills\\uuuumummmuuumummuiunuunnuiuiuuuununmnnnnunnumimmmHinnmmuuuunnmnmmuumnnmmmm April Pase 4 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Thursday- 23 ACTAP Retest Make - Up Day 8-4 p.m. K-3 Summer School Training IRC 8:30 - 3:00 p.m. LRSD Quiz Bowl Preliminary W. Hills 6p.m. - Board Meeting Board Room Eriday- 24 Monday- 27 ACTAP Retest Make - Up Day (SOMETIME DURING THIS WEEK) COE/COE Addendum Survey - Grade 10-12 (Replaces School Climate/Human Relation Survey) (All junior high schools except Dunbar, Henderson \u0026amp; Southwest) 1:30p.m. - General Principals Meeting Board Room 2-3 p.m. School Nurse Staff Meeting TBA Tuesday- 28 4-7 p.m. National Staff Development Standards IRC 4:15 p.m. Gifted \u0026amp; Talented Council Hall Wednesday- 29 No Meetings Scheduled Thursday- 30 No Meetings Scheduled V .k: 'I RECEJVEO ?\u0026lt;: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS May, 1998 OmCEOF l^^SEGREGAnOfiMOmOlilfiQ -'2.S . SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS lUUUUUHUUUlUUUHHHUUUHllHUUlHUUlUHUUUllUnUllUlUUHUlUniUUlHUHnUUlUUUlHUUllUUUHUUHlUUUUUHlUUUUUn DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Friday-1 No Meetings Scheduled Monday- 4 8:30-3:30p.m. Secondary Counselors Inservice Metro 6:30-9 p.m. SECMEAwards Banquet UALR Tuesday- S 8:30-3:30 p.m. Service Learning Coordinators Board Room 6p.m. - LRSD Biracial Meeting Board Room Wednesday-6 8:30 - 3 p.m. Quiz Bowl Finals - Div. I Hall High 9-2 p.m. Tri District Job Fair Woodys Sherwood Forest Thursday- 7 8:30 - 3 p.m. Quiz Bowl Finals - Div. H Hall High 10-Noon Supts. Student Cabinet HendersonW' VI* ****** May Page 2 5 '^ DATE-TIME MEETING . PLACE Friday- 8 8:30-3 p.m. Quiz Bowl FinaE - Jr. High Hall High 8:30-Noon Elementary Counselors Inservice Garland Monday- Il No Meetings Scheduled Tuesday-12 4:30p.m. - Middle School Steering Committee Board Room Wednesday- 13 No Meetings Scheduled Thursday-14 5 p.m. - Board Agenda Meeting Board Room Friday-15 No Meetings Scheduled Monday-18 4- 7p.m. Test Taking Strategies IRC 1:30p.m. - PrincipaE Meeting Board Room 7p.m. - Graduation (Central) Barton ColEeumI May Page 3 J. : DATE-TIME MEETING. PLACE ' ' ll' Tuesday-19 4:30p.nt. - Appeals Committee SAO 6p.m. - Graduation (Parkview) Barton Coliseum 8:30p.m. - t. Graduation (McClellan) Barton Coliseum Wednesday- 20 8:30 -1:45p.m. 6^ Grade Challenge Parkview 6p.m. - Graduation (J.A. Fair) Barton Coliseum 8:30 p.m. - Graduation (Hall) Thursday- 21 Barton Coliseum 8:30-1:45p.m. Grade Challenge Parkview Friday- 22 No Meetings Scheduled Monday- 25 Memorial Day (Observed) Students Out/Administrative Offices Closed Tuesday- 26 No Meetings ScheduledMay Pase 4 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Wednesday- 27 No Meetings Scheduled Thursday 28 6 p.m. - Board Meeting Board Room Friday- 29 No Meetings Scheduled . i 3 J. .-I\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\^^^^ received LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS May, 1998 OFFICE OF ^^S^GATIOfiMONITORIHQ SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS uuunnuuuuuniuuuuuuuunuunuuuuuuuuunuuuuuuuuuuuuuunnnuuuunuunnuunuuuuuiuunuuuuuuuuuuuu DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Friday- 1 No Meetings Scheduled Monday- 4 8:30 - 3:30p.m. Secondary Counselors Inservice Metro 6:30 - 9 p.m. SECMEAwards Banquet UALR Tuesday- 5 8:30 - 3:30p.m. Service Learning Coordinators Board Room 6 p.m. - LRSD Biracial Meeting Board Room Wednesday-6 8:30-3 p.m. Quiz Bowl Finals - Div. I Hall High 9-2 p.m. Tri District Job Fair Woodys Sherwood Forest Thursday- 7 8:30 - 3 p.m. Quiz Bowl Finals-Div. H Hall High 10 - Noon Supts. Student Cabinet HendersonMay Page 2 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Friday- 8 8:30 - 3 p.m. Quiz Bowl Finals - Jr. High Hall High 8:30 - Noon Elementary Counselors Inservice Garland Monday- Il No Meetings Scheduled Tuesday-12 4:30 p.m. - Middle School Steering Committee Board Room Wednesday- 13 No Meetings Scheduled Thursday-14 5p.m. - Board Agenda Meeting Board Room Friday-15 No Meetings Scheduled Monday- 18 4- 7p.m. Test Taking Strategies IRC 1:30p.m. - Principal * Meeting Board Room 7p.m. - Graduation (Central) Barton Coliseum**************************************************************jj********************^******* May Page 3 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Tuesday- 19 4:30 p.m. - Appeals Committee SAO 6 p.m - Graduation (Parkview) Barton Coliseum 8:30 p.m - Graduation (McClellan) Barton Coliseum Wednesday- 20 8:30 1:45p.m 6\"* Grade Challenge Parkview 6 p.m - Graduation (J.A. Fair) Barton Coliseum 8:30 p.m - Graduation (Hall) Barton Coliseum Thursday- 21 8:30-1:45p.m Grade Challenge Parkview Friday- 22 No Meetings Scheduled Monday- 25 Memorial Day (Observed) Students Out/Administrative Offices Closed Tuesday- 26 No Meetings ScheduledMay Paged DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Wednesday- 27 No Meetings Scheduled Thursday 28 6 p.m. - Board Meeting Board Room Friday- 29 No Meetings Scheduledk^'k-k-k-itik-k-k-k'k'k'fctck-k'ick-k^ck-fcfckik'k^'kik-k-k^-k-k-k-k-kii-k-fck-kk-k-k-k'ifft^'it'/ck'ifk-ifkik-k-k-k'k'it-k-k-k-fe-k-k-k'k'k-k'ki F*' LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 00^ 6 1998 October, 1998 SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS -OSSWESATIOnMONITORINd DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Thursday- 1 8:30-3:00 p.m. New Teachers Inseryice Reading Dept.(Grades 4,5,6) IRC 10-11:00 a.m. Superintendents Student Cabinet Central High 2 - 3:30 p.m. ESL Tutors IRC 3-5 p.m. Open House IRC 5-8:00 p.m E-mail IRC Friday- 2 8:30-3:45 p.m. Jr. High Counselors Inseryice IRC/Rm.l9 Saturday-3 9-10:30 a.m. Title I Parent Inyolyement Kick-Off IRC Monday- 5 4- 4:00 p.m. Basic Internet Bale Tuesday- 6 3:30-4:45 p.m. Language Arts Textbook Inseryice Grade 3 St. Vincent 4- 7:00 p.m. Surf the Net-Thematic Units IRC 4:30-6 p.m. Middle School CIA Committee IRCOctober Page 2 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Wednesday- 7 8-3:30 p.m. Middle Sehool CIA Committee IRC 4- 7:00 p.m. Basie Into to Using the Internet IRC Thursday- 8 8-3:30 p.m. Middle Sehool CIA Committee IRC 8:30-3:00 p.m. New Teachers Inseryice Reading Dept.,( Grades 1,23) IRC 3:30-4:45 p.m. Language Arts Textbook Inservice Grade 3 St. Vincent Terrace Rm. 4-7:00 p.m. Middle School IRC 5 p.m. - Agenda Meeting Board Room Friday- 9 8-3:30 p.m. Middle School CIA Committee IRC 8-12:00 p.m. Winnebags Training (Beginners) IRC 8-2:30 p.m. Elementary Counselors Inseryice King. Elem. Monday- 12 8 - 3:30 p.m. Middle School CIA Committee IRC 11:30 a.m. - VIPs Board of Directors Board Room 3:30 - 4:45 p.m. Language Arts Textbook Inseryice TBA 4- 7:00 p.m. Basic Intro to Using the Internet IRCJjt***************************************************************************************** October Page 3 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Tuesday-13 8- 3:30 p.m. Middle School CIA Committee IRC 3:30 - 4:45 p.m. Language Arts Textbook Inservice Grade 6 TBA 4 - 7:00 p.m. Cooperative Team Learning IRC 4:30 - 6:00 p.m. Middle School CIA Committee IRC Wednesday-14 8-3 p.m. EPSF Study Inservice for Teachers IRC/Rm.l7 Thursday- 15 ALL DAY AEDA Conference (AR Early Childhood Association) Riverfront Hilton 4:15-5:30 p.m. Foreign Languages Council IRC 4 - 7:00 p.m. Computer 101 IRC Friday- 16 ALL DAY AECA Conference (AR Early Childhood Association) Riverfront Hilton Saturday-17 8:30 -1 p.m. Youth Leadership Institute Water Treatment Plant (on Rocky Valley)October Page 4 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Monday- 19 3:30 - 4:45 p.m. Language Arts Textbook Inservice Grade 3 TBA 4-7:00 p.m. Computer 101 IRC 4-7:00 p.m. Diversity in the Classroom IRC 4:15 - 5:30 p.m. English Council IRC Tuesday- 20 3:30 - 4:45 p.m. Language Arts Textbook Inservice Grade 5 TBA 5-8:00 p.m. Basic Internet IRC Wednesday-21 4-7:00 p.m. Surf the Net-Thematic Units IRC Thursday- 22 8:30-11:30 a.m. Elementary Librarians Bale Elem. 1 p.m. - All Librarians Central AR Library (Main) 4 - 7:00 p.m. Diversity in the Classroom IRC 6 p.m. - Board Meeting Board Room Friday- 23 No Meeting Scheduled Saturday- 24 9-11:00 a.m. Title I Key Facilitators Training IRC******************************************************************************************* October Page 5 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Monday- 26 8-3:00 p.m. Pre-K Instruction! Aides Inservice IRC 12-3:00 p.m. School Nurse Staff Inservice TBA Tuesday- 27 4 - 7:00 p.m. Surf the Net-Thematic Units IRC 4-7:00 p.m. Cooperative Team Learning IRC 4 - 7:00 p.m. Basic Internet Bale Wednesday- 28 3:30 - 4:45 p.m. Language Arts Textbook Inservice Grade 1 TBA 4-7:00 p.m. Surf the Net-Thematic Units IRC Thursday- 29 4-7:00 p.m. Computer 101 IRC Friday- 30 No Meeting ScheduledREcir ************************************************************************* MOV 4 1998 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS November, 1998 SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS ************************************************************************jj********j^********* DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Monday- 2 4-7 p.m. Basic Internet Bale Elem. 4-7 p.m. NatI. Staff Dev. Standards IRC 5-8 p.m. Basic Computer Tools IRC Tuesday-3 4-7 p.m. First Steps in Using the Internet IRC Wednesday- 4 9 a.m. - Lyceum High School Reception Thursday- 5 Philander Smith College 5 p.m. - Board Agenda Meeting Board Room Friday- 6 No Meetings Scheduled Monday- 9 9-3 p.m. - Jr. High Quiz Bowl Final Hall High 4-7 p.m. Positive Discipline - Discipline w/Dignity IRC 5-8 p.m. Basic Computer Tools IRC 4 November Page 2 DATE/TIME MEETING PLACE Tuesday- 10 9-3 p.m. - Elementary, Division I Hall High 4:15 5:30 p.m. Social Studies Council Meeting IRC 5-8 p.m. Excel 97, Module I Hall High 5-8 p.m. PowerPoint, Module I Rockefeller 6 p.m. - LRSD Biracial Committee Board Room Wednesday-11 9-3 p.m. Elementary, Division H Hall High Thursday- 12 8-11 a.m. Winnebago Nonbook Cataloging (Session A) IRC 12 Noon Winnebago Nonbook Cataloging (Session B) IRC 10 a.m.-Noon Superintendents Student Cabinet Hall High 5:30-6:30 p.m. Early Childhood Education Task Force IRC Rm.l7 5-8 p.m. PowerPoint, Module I Rockefeller Friday- 13 No Meetings Scheduled Saturday- 14 8:30-12-30 p.m. Title I Annual Mandated Meeting ML KingNovember Page 3 DATE/TIME MEETING PLACE Monday-16 11:30-1 p.m. VIPS Executive Committee VIPS Office 4-7 p.m. Surf Net for Thematic Units IRC 4-7 p.m. Diversity in the Classroom IRC Tuesday-17 VIPS READING DAY Elementary Schools 8- 3 p.m. Cluster A Gifted \u0026amp; Talented Specialists IRC Rm. 19 3-4 p.m. Pre-K Teacher Observation and Enrichment for Gifted Students IRC Rm.l9 4-7 p.m. Surf the Net for Thematic Units IRC 4-7 p.m. 5-8 p.m. Basic Internet Word 97, Module I Bale Rockefeller 5-8 p.m. PowerPoint 97, Module I Hall Wednesday- 18 8-3 p.m. Cluster B - Gifted \u0026amp; Talented Specialists IRC Rm. 19 9 a.m. - Tri-District Partners in Education Chamber of Commerce 4 - 5:30 p.m. SAP Coordinators Meeting Hall High**A*iliiliili**AA*A*AAAA*****ili* *********************** A***AAAAAiliA******A*A**A***AA**A**A* ******* November Page 4 DATE/TIME MEETING PLACE Thursday- 19 8-3 p.m. Cluster C - Gifted \u0026amp; Talented Specialists IRC Rm.l9 2:50-3:50 p.m. ECERS Inservice for Pre-K Teachers at Washington, Wilson, Franklin IRC Rm.21 4-7 p.m. Diversity in the Classroom IRC 5-8 p.m. PowerPoint 97, Module I Hall High 6 p.m. - Board Meeting Board Room Friday- 20 No Meetings Scheduled Saturday- 21 8:30 -1 p.m. Youth Leadership Institute TBA Monday- 23 1-3:30 p.m. School Nurse StaffZInservice TBA 4-7 p.m. Multiple IntelUgences IRC Tuesday- 24 4:15 p.m. - Gifted \u0026amp; Talented Council Hall HighNoyember Page 5 DATE/TIME MEETING PLACE Wednesday- 25 Students Out Thursday- 26 THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY Students Out Administration Offices Closed Friday-27 THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY Students Out Administration Offices Closed Monday- 30 No Meeting Scheduled ***No Principals Meeting Scheduled for November***If******A**********A**A*************A*A*A***AAA**A***A*AAA*A**************************** LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS February, 1999 SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS *****************************************************************************:lrib***)t*******^ DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Monday- 1 6:30 p.m. - Magnificent Monday Wilson Elem. Tuesday- 2 9-Noon SECME Technical Assistance Workshop McClellan 4:30 p.m. - Career Orientation Teachers Metro 6 p.m. - LRSD Biracial Committee Meeting Board Room Wednesday- 3 NO MEETING SCHEDULED Thursday- 4 10-Noon Superintendents Student Cabinet TBA Friday- 5 5 p.m. - PAC Workshop/Facilitators Meeting Excelsior Hotel Saturday- 6 9 a.m. - PAC Workshop/Facilitators Meeting Excelsior HotelFebruary Page 2 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Monday- 8 NO MEETING SCHEDULED Tuesday- 9 8:30-3:30 p.m. Elementary Librarians IRC Wednesday- 10 NO MEETING SCHEDULED Thursday- 11 5 p.m. - Board Agenda Meeting Board Room Friday-12 NO MEETING SCHEDULED Monday- 15 6:30 p.m. - Magnificent Monday Garland Elem. Tuesday- 16 4:30 p.m. - Middle School Steering Committee Board Room 4:30 p.m. - LRSD Appeals Meeting Student Registration Office 6:30 p.m. - Terrific Tuesday Fair Park\u0026lt; February Page 3 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Wednesday-17 NO MEETING SCHEDULED Thursday- 18 8:30 - Noon Elementary Counselors Inseryice Board Room Friday-19 Oyernight- Secondary Peer Retreat 4-H Center Saturday-20 8:30 -12 Noon Youth Leadership Education Session TBA 9 a.m. - Super Saturday TBA Oyernight - Secondary Peer Retreat 4-H Center * 'it * * * ** A * it -it -fe -ie -k -k * \"k * * -it * * * -k -it'ft 'kit * * A * * it * 4e * * -k 'k'k -k-k * -ft -k -k * -k -ft rk ie -it -k -ft is tk ie is it * * -k * * -k * * * -k * * * -it Sunday- 21 Secondary Peer Retreat 4-H Center Monday- 22 NO MEETING SCHEDULED Tuesday- 23 AR Association of Partners in Education Holiday Inn Select 4:15-5:15 p.m. G/T Council Hall High**************************************************************^*********************^****^* February Page 4 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Wednesday- 24 8 - 4:30 p.m. AGATE Pre-Conference Hot Springs 1:30 p.m. - Thursday- 25 8 a.m. - 9 p.m. 6 p.m. - 6-9 p.m. Friday- 26 8-4 p.m. AR Association of Partners in Education Principals Meeting AGATE Conference Board Meeting SECME Multicultural Extrayaganza AGATE Conference Holiday Inn Select TBA Hot Springs Board Room Ricks Armory Hot Springs************************************************* J^***********^*^J[*****^** r a 23VEO \u0026gt;3KS NiAR 2 1 d LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS OFFICE CF March, 1999 DESEGnEGQ?^i^G:^SM SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS *******************************************************************^*^^^*^^^ DATE-TIME MEETING *************** PLACE Monday-1 4-7 p.m. Basic Internet Bale 4-7 p.m. Action Research IRC Tuesday- 2 8:30 - 4 p.m. Project Alert Workshop Board Room 8:30-4 p.m. Peer Mediation Workshop Metro 4-7 p.m. Computer 101 IRC 4:30 p.m. - Middle School Steering Committee Lounge Wednesday- 3 8:30 - 4 p.m. Peer Mediation Workshop Metro 4-7 p.m. Diversity in the Classroom IRC 6:30 p.m. - Terrific Tuesday Workshop Franklin Thursday- 4 8:30 - 4 p.m. Peer Mediation Workshop MetroMarch page 2 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Friday- 5 No Meeting Scheduled Saturday- 6 8-6 p.m. SE Regional OM Monday- 8 4-7 p.m. Surf Net for Thematic Units IRC Tuesday- 9 10 a.m. - AR Association National School Public Relations Assoc. AR School Board Assoc. 4-7 p.m. Middle School IRC Wednesday- 10 4-7 p.m. Diversity in the Classroom IRC Thursday- 11 4 -7 p. m. Positive Discipline/Instruction IRC 5 p.m. - Board Agenda Meeting Board Room Friday- 12 No Meeting Scheduled Saturday -13 8:30 -1 p.m. LRSD Biracial Retreat Board RoomMarch page 3 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Monday-15 12:00- VIPS Board of Directors Board Room 4-7 p.m. Surf Net for Thematic Units IRC 6:30 p.m. Magnificent Monday Workshop Mitchell Tuesday- 16 Curriculum Reference Testing (Grades 2 -6) 9-11 a.m. Tri-District Patners in Education Idea Exchange Jacksonville Comm. Cntr. 4:30 p.m. - LRSD Appeals Committee SRO 4:30 p.m. - Middle School Steering Committee Board Room 6:30 p.m. - Terrific Tuesday Workshop Badgett Wednesday- 17 Thursday- 18 Curriculum Reference Testing (Grades 2-6) Friday- 19 Curriculum Reference Testing (Grades 2-6) Saturday - 20 No Meeting Scheduled 8:30-12:00 Youth Leadership Institute TBA 9 a.m. - Super Saturday Workshop IRCMarch page 4 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Monday- 22 4-7 p.m. Surf Net for Thematic Units IRC Tuesday- 23 1 -3:30 p.m. School Nurse Staff/Inservice TBA 4-7 p.m. Basic Internet Bale 4:15 p.m. - Gifted \u0026amp; Talented Council Hall High Wednesday-24 1:30- Principals Meeting TBA Thursday- 25 6 p.m. - Board Meeting Board Room Friday- 26 No Meeting Scheduled received LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MAR 2 4 1999 April, 1999 OmCEOF DESEGREGATION MONITORING SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Thursday-1 SPRING BREAK No Meeting Scheduled Friday- 2 SPRING BREAK No Meeting Scheduled Monday- 5 4-7 p.m. Basic Internet Bale Elem. 4-7 p.m. Action Research IRC 4-7 p.m. Diversity in the Classroom IRC Tuesday- 6 6 p.m. - LRSD Biracial Committee Board Room Wednesday-7 8:30-3:30 p.m. Elementary Librarians IRC Thursday- 8 10-Noon Superintendents Student Cabinet PuLHgts. Jr. 5p.m. - Board Agenda Meeting Board RoomApril Pase 2 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Friday- 9 No Meeting Scheduled Saturday-10 8-6 p.m. State Odyssey of the Mind Russellville, AR 9 a.m. - Cluster Saturday IRC Monday-12 4-7 p.m. Diversity in the Classroom IRC 11:30-1:30 p.m. VIPS Board Meeting Board Room Selected Times CPR for Nurses TBA Tuesday- 13 Selected Times CPR for Nurses TBA Wednesday-14 8:30-Noon Secondary Counselors IRC Thursday - 15 No Meeting Scheduled Friday-16 8:30-2:30 p.m. Elementary Counselors Washington Magnet Elem. Saturday- 17 8-5 p.m. Paint Your Heart Out******************************************************************************************* April page 3 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Monday- 19 No Meeting Scheduled Tuesday- 20 4-7 p.m. Basic Internet Bale Elem. 4:30 p.m. - LRSD Appeals Committee SRO Conf. Room 5:30 - 7:30p.m. An Evening for the Stars Volunteer/Staff Reception Ricks Armory Wednesday- 21 1:30 p.m. - Principals Meeting TBA Thursday- 22 4-7 p.m. Middle School IRC 6 p.m. - Board Meeting Board Room Friday - 23 No Meeting Scheduled Saturday-24 8-5 p.m. Rain Date - Paint Your Heart Out Sunday- 25 AR Volunteer Directions Conference Hot SpringsMonday- 26 i AR Volunteer Directions Conference Hot Springs Tuesday- 27 4:15 p.m. - Gifted and Talented Council Hall High Wednesday- 28 AR Volunteer Directions Conference Hot Springs 1:30 - 3:00p.m. School Nurse Staff Meeting TBA Thursday- 29 7 a.nt. - National Coalition of Title I Parents Region VI - Training Conference Excelsior Hotel/ Statehouse Convention Center Friday- 30 Meeting ScheduledLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS May, 1999 my 4 1999' SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS ^SHESATIOfJ mTSBUi^ * W **** ilf A **** A tfc A **** W ilf tte ******************** ******** A st ww DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Monday- 3 4-7 p.m. Basic Internet Bale Tuesday- 4 4:30 p.m. - Appeals Committee SRO Conference Room Wednesday- 5 No Meeting Scheduled Thursday- 6 6:30 p.m. - LRAEOP Bosses Night McClellan High Friday- 7 No Meeting Scheduled Monday-10 No Meeting Scheduled Tuesday- 11 No Meeting Scheduled********************************** ********************************************************* May Calendar Page 2 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Wednesday-12 No Meeting Scheduled Thursday-13 4-7 p.m. Diyersity in the Classroom IRC 5 p.m. - Board Agenda Meeting Board Room Friday-14 No Meeting Scheduled ******************************************************************************************* Monday- 17 No Meeting Scheduled Tuesday-18 4-7 p.m. Basic Internet Bale 6 p.m. - LRSD Biracial Meeting Board Room Wednesday-19 8:30- 1:30 p.m. 6* Grade Challenge Parkyiew Thursday- 20 4-7 p.m. Diyersity in the Classroom IRC 8:30 -1:30 p.m. 6'*' Grade Challenge Parkyiew *******************************************************************************************May Calendar Page 3 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Friday- 21 No Meeting Scheduled Monday- 24 No Meeting Scheduled Tuesday- 25 No Meeting Scheduled Wednesday- 26 8:30-11:30 a.m. Superintendents Quarterly Staff Meeting Quality Foods 1:30-4:30 p.m. General Principals Meeting Quality Foods Thursday- 27 6 p.m. - Board Meeting Board Room Friday- 28 No Meeting Scheduled Sunday- 30 2:30 p.m. - McClellan High Bacclaureate McClellan 4 p.m. - J.A. Fair High School J.A. Fair 4 p. m. - Parkyiew Magnet 9999 Parkyiew 5 p.m. - Hall High 9999 Hall High 6 p.m. - Central High School 9999 Central High****************************************************************************************** May Calendar Paee 4 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Monday- 31 MEMORIAL DAY SCHOOLS AND ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES CLOSEDAUGUST, 1999 SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Monday- 2 1:30 p.m. - Brokers Meeting Board Room Tuesday- 3 8:30-3 p.m. Inseryice/Secretaries Board Room 9 a.m. - Lab School Meeting Conference Room 9-4 p.m. Summer Technology Class Using Writing Processors in the Classroom IRC Wednesday- 4 8-4 p.m. 1999-2000 Diyision Meeting IRC 9-4 p.m. Summer Technology Class Using Writing Processors in the Classroom IRC 10-7 p.m. Student Check-In (Registration) All Schools Thursday- 5 10-7 p.m. Student Check-In (Registration) All Schools 6 p.m.- Orientation (J.A. Fair) August Calendar Page 2 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Friday- 6 7:30 a.m. - Tri-District Partners Immanuel Baptist Church Mondav-9 9-7 p.m. Lab School Meeting Board Room Tuesday- 10 No Meeting Scheduled Wednesday-11 8:30- 5 p.m. Planning Meeting Board Room Thursday- 12 Teachers Report to Work All Schools 9-3 p.m. Physical Education Teachers Inservice Board Room 2-5 p.m. Orientation (Central) 5 p.m. - Board Agenda Meeting Board Room Friday-13 9-3 p.m. Physical Education Teachers Inseryice Board Room Monday- 16 8:30-3:30 p.m. G/T Specialists Inseryice PH Elem. 12:30-3:30 p.m. G/T Facilitators Inseryice PH Elem.August Calendar Page 3 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Tuesday- 17 8:30-3:30 p.m. Elem. Counselors Board Room 8:30-3:30 p.m. G/T Specialists Inservice PH Elem. 4:30-8 p.m. G/T Curriculum Development PH Elem. 4:30- Appeals Committee SRO Wednesday- 18 8 a.m. - Employee Convocation Statehouse Convention Center 1:30 p.m. - Principals Meeting Quality Foods Thursday- 19 10 a.m. - Orientation (Hall) Hall Friday- 20 9-11 a.m. 1-3 p.m. 10 a.m. - 1 p.m. - Orientation (6'*' Grade) Orientation (7*'' Grade) Orientation (Parkview - 9' Grade) Orientation (Parkview - 10\" Grade) All Middle Schools All Middle Schools Parkview Parkview Sunday- 22 2 p.m. - Orientation (McClellan) McClellan Monday- 23 9-4 p.m. Lab School Meeting Board RoomAu2ust Calendar Page 4 DATE-TIME MEETING PLACE Tuesday- 24 Student Report to Class Wednesday- 25 No Meeting Scheduled Thursday- 26 6 p.m. - Board of Directors Meeting Board Room Friday- 27 No Meeting Scheduled Monday- 30 4:30-8 p.m. G/T Curriculum Deyelopment PH Elem. Tuesday-31 8 a.m. - SAT-9 Inseryice Board Room Elementary Open House All Elementary SchoolsSEP 15 1999 OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT SEPTEMBER, 1999 SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION Wednesday- 1 8-4 p.m. 1999-2000 Division Meetings IRC 8:30-4 p.m. Sr. High Counselors Metro Media Center 9:30 -12 noon Lab School Conf. Rm. (Admin. Bldg.) 11- 1:30 p.m. VIPS Board Room Thursday- 2 No Meeting Scheduled Friday- 3 8:30 - 3 p.m. New Counselors Orientation Board Room Monday- 6 LABOR DAY HOLIDAY (All Schools \u0026amp; Admin. OBices Closed) September Calendar Page 2 DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION Tuesday- 7 8:30-10 a.m. 504 Training (Secondary Principals) Board Room 1- 2:30 p.m. 504 Training (Elementary Principals) Board Room Wednesday- 8 4 p.m. Drug Free Schools \u0026amp; Comm. Adyisory Council Board Room Thursday- 9 9:30-11:30 Smart Start Liye Forum IRC 5 p.m. - Board Agenda Meeting Board Room Friday-10 No Meeting Scheduled Monday- 13 No Meeting Scheduled Tuesday- 14 SAT-9 Testing AU Schools 10 -11:30 a.m. Laidlaw Transportation Board Room Wednesday- 15 SAT-9 Testing All Schools 10-11:30 a.m. Laidlaw Transportation Board RoomSeptember Calendar page 3 DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION Thursday- 16 SAT-9 Testing All Schools 10-11:30 a.m. Laidlaw Transportation Board Room 4-7 p.m. Computer 101 IRC Friday- 17 No Meeting Scheduled Monday- 20 Tuesday- 21 No Meeting Schedule 4:30 p.m. - Appeals Committee Student Registration Wednesday- 22 1:30 p.m. Principals Meeting Quality Foods Thursday- 23 9-12:30 Lab Schools Board Room 9-4 p.m. SEDL CAT Training TBA 1 -2:30 p.m. Lab Schools Board Room 6 p.m. - Board of Directors Meeting Board Room Friday- 24 No Meeting Scheduled Monday- 27 4-7 p.m. Classroom Effectiyeness New Teachers (Middle \u0026amp; Secondary) IRC 11-1 p.m. VIPs Board Meeting Board RoomSeptember page 4 DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION Tuesday- 28 8:30-4 p.m. Life Skills Training Middle School Health Teachers Metro Media Center 4:15-5:30 p.m. Social Studies Council IRC/Rm.l9 4:15- Gifted \u0026amp; Talented Council Hall High Wednesday- 29 8:30-4 p.m. Life Skills Training Middle School Health Teachers Metro Media Center Thursday- 30 8:30 - noon ACT Discoyer Workshop H.S. Teachers \u0026amp; Career Ed. Teachers Metro Media CenterDATE/TIME Monday-1 4:00 - 7:00 p.m. 4:30 - 7:30 p.m. 4:00-8:00 p.m. Tuesday- 2 8:00 -3:00 p.m. 4:00 - 7:00 p.m. 4:00 - 7:00 p.m. 4:00- 6 p.m. - Wednesday- 3 8:30 a.m. - 8:30 a.m. - NOVEMBER, 1999 SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS MEETING Internet Basic Computer Toolbox K-4 Crusade ELLA Action Research Basic Computer Skills LRCPMSA Biracial Committee Diyision Meeting (Instruction) PRE/Computer Lab RECESVED NOV 03 1999 OFFICFOF 0ES6RE6An0N MONITORING LOCATION IRC IRC IRC IRC IRC IRC IRC Board Room IRC IRC Noyember Calendar Page 2 DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION Thursday- 4 8:30-11:30 a.m. 10 a.m. - 4 p.m. - 5 p.m. - Basic Internet Supts. Student Cabinet Early Childhool Board Agenda Meeting IRC Parkyiew IRC Board Room Friday- 5 8 a.m. - Standards IRC Monday- 8 8:00 - 3:00 p.m. 4:30 - 7:30 p.m. 4:00 - 8:00 p.m. Effectiye Literacy Basic Computer Toolbox K-4 Crusade IRC IRC IRC Tuesday- 9 8:00 a.m. - 8:00-3:00 p.m. 8:00-3:30 p.m. 4:30-7:30 p.m. Charter Schools ELLA G/T Computer Class Windows 95 Middle Schools Networking IRC IRC IRC IRC IRC Wednesday-10 8:00-3:00 p.m. 12:00-2:00 p.m. Effectiye Literacy Smart Start IRC IRC Thursday- 11 8:30-4:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. - 4:30 - 7:30 p.m. Diyersity Early Childhood Printshop IRC IRC IRC AEA Teachers Conyention (Students Out)Noyember Calendar Page 3 DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION Friday- 12 8:30-4:00 p.m. 8:30-4:00 p.m. Diyersity Character Education IRC IRC Monday- 15 AEA Teachers Conyention (Students Out) 12:30-3:00 p.m. 4:00-8:00 p.m. 4:30-7:30 p.m. Printshop K-4 Crusade Basic Computer Toolbox IRC IRC IRC Tuesday-16 8:00-3:00 p.m. 8:00-3:00 p.m. 4:00 - 7:00 p.m. 4:30 p.m. - 6th Grade-CMP ELLA MVT Appeals Committee 4:30-7:30 p.m. Word Processors in Classroom IRC IRC IRC SRO Conf. Room IRC Wednesday- 17 8:00-3:00 p.m. 8:00-3:00 p.m. 6* Grade-CMP ELLA Elementary Peer Retreat IRC IRC Femdale 4-H Center Thursday- 18 4:00 p.m. - 4:30 - 7:30 p.m. 6 p.m. - Elementary Peer Retreat Early Childhood Word Processing in Classrooms Board Meeting Ferndale 4-H Center IRC IRC Board Room Friday- 19 No Meetings ScheduledNovember Calendar Page 4 DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION Monday- 22 4:00 - 7:00 p.m. 4:30 - 7:30 p.m. 4:00 -8:00 p.m. Character Education Basic Computer Toolbox K-4 Crusade IRC IRC IRC Tuesday- 23 4:15 p.m. - Gifted \u0026amp; Talented Council Hall High Wednesday- 24 8:30-3:30 p.m. Diyersity IRC Thursday- 25 Staff Development Day (Students Out) THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY Friday- 26 THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY Monday- 29 4:00 p.m. - 4:30-7:30 p.m. 4:00 8:00 p.m. Texthook Adoption Basic Computer Toolbox K-4 Crusade IRC IRC IRC Tuesday- 30 8:00-3:00 p.m. 4:00 p.m. - 4:15-5:30 p.m. ELLA Early Childhood Social Studies Council IRC IRC ParkviewRECEIVED FEB 4 2000 Office OF desegregation MONITORIMQ SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS MONTHLY CALENDAR FEBRUARY, 2000 DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION Tuesday-1 10 a.m. - Tri-District PIE Steering Committee Chamber of Commerce 12:30-3:30 p.m. Printshop IRC 4-7 p.m. Surfing the Net IRC 4-7 p.m. Classroom Effectiyeness for 6-12 Teachers IRC 4:30-7:30 Basic Computer Toolbox Mabelvale Elem. 6 p.m. - Family Math/Science Terry Elem. Library Wednesday- 2 12 Noon - Education Committee Chamber of Commerce Thursday- 3 7:30 a.m. - Collaboratiye Action Team Uniyersity Park Adult Leisure Center 10-Noon Supt. Student Cabinet Mabelyale Middle 4-7 p.m. First Steps in Using Internet IRC February 2000 Page 2 DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION Friday- 4 No Meetings Scheduled Saturday- 5 10 a.m. - Family Math/Science Terry Elem. Library Monday- 7 4-7 p.m. Cultural Diyersity Techniques IRC 4-7 p.m. Using Data, Analysis and Curriculum Alignment IRC 4-7 p.m. Classroom Effectiyeness for Elementary Teachers IRC 4:30 - 7:30 p.m. PowerPoint 97 I Mabelyale Elem. 4:30 - 7:30 p.m. Basic Windows 95 IRC Tuesday- 8 8:30-3:30 p.m. Word 97 II IRC 9:30-Noon SECME Technical Assistance Workshop McClellan 4 p.m. - LR CPMSA Goyerning Board Meeting Admin. Bldg. Conf. Rm. 4:30-7:30 p.m. Basic Computer Toolbox Mabelyale Elem. 4:30-7:30 p.m. Prinshop IRC 6 p.m. - Biracial Committee Meeting Board RoomFebruary 200Q Page 3 DATE/TIME meeting location Wednesday-9 3-6 p.m. CPR Class Admin. Bldg. Board Room 4-7 p.m. Accountability Skills IRC Thursday- IQ 8:30 - Noon Elem. Counselors Inservice IRC 8:30 - 3 p.m. Middle School Quiz Bowl Finals Hall 1 - 3:45 p.m. Secondary Counselors Inservice IRC 4:30 - 7:30 p.m. PowerPoint 971 Mabelvale Elem. 4:30-7:30 p.m. Integrating Internet into the Classroom IRC 5 p.m. - Board Agenda Meeting Board Room Friday-11 No Meetings Scheduled Monday-14 No Meetings Scheduled Tuesday- 15 8:30-3 p.m. Div. I Qui^ Bowl Finals HaU 8:30 -11:30 a.m. E-Mail IRC 12:30-3:30 p.m. Basic Internet IRC 4:30 p.m. - Appeals Committee SRO 4:30-7:30 p.m. Basic Computer Toolbox Mabelvale Elem. February 2000 Page 4 DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION Wednesday-16 8:30-3 p.m. Div. II Quiz Bowl Finals Hall Thursday-17 4:30-7:30 p.m. Integrating Internet into the Classroom IRC 4:30 - 7:30 p.m. Windows 95 Mabelvale Elem. 6 - 8:30 p.m. SECME Multicultural Extravaganza Ricks Armory Friday-18 No Meetings Scheduled Monday- 21 1-3:30 p.m. School Nurses Inservice AR Childrens Hospital 4:30 - 7:30 p.m. Excel 971 IRC Tuesday- 22 4:15 p.m. - 4:30-7:30 p.m. 4:30-7:30 p.m. Parent Conference Day (Students Out) G/T Council Hall Basic Computer Toolbox Excel 971 Mabelvale Elem. IRCFebruary 2000 Page 5 DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION Wednesday- 23 ALL DAY AGATE Conference Hot Springs 8:30-3:30 p.m. Word 97 II IRC 1:30 p.m. Principals Meeting Greater Second Baptist Geyer Springs Road Thursday- 24 ALL DAY AGATE Conference Hot Springs 4-7 p.m. From Cartoons to Ekis Letters Teaching with Documents IRC 4:30-7:30 p.m. Integrating Internet into the Classroom IRC 6 p.m. - Board Meeting Board Room 6:30 p.m. - AGATE Parent Night Hot Springs Friday- 25 ALL DAY AGATE Conference Hot Springs 9- 4:00 p.m. AP Conference Saturday- 26 9- 3:30 p.m. AP Conference 11 a.m.- Community Meeting LR CPMSA South End Alert CenterFebruary 2000 Page 6 DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION Monday- 28 4-7 p.m. Performance Assessment and Use of Rubrics IRC 4:30 - 7:30 p.m. PowerPoint 97 II Mabelvale Elem. 4:30 - 7:30 p.m. Inspiration IRC Tuesday- 29 4:30-7:30 p.m. Integrating Internet into the Classroom IRCC.' I RECSVED Off iCt Ct desegregaticmmonitoring SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS MONTHLY CALENDAR MARCH, 2000 DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION Wednesday- 1 3-6 p.m. CPR-Adult Board Room Thursday- 2 10 a.m. - Noon Supt. Student Cabinet McClellan 2-4 p.m. Middle School Nurses Henderson 4-7 p.m. Surfing the Net IRC Friday- 3 No Meetings Scheduled Monday- 6 8:30-3:30 p.m. Excel 971 IRC 4-7 p.m. Performance Assessment in the Classroom IRC 4:30 - 7:30 p.m. Excel 971 Mabelyale Elementary Achieyement Leyel Test (ALT) Grades 2-11 All Schools March Calendar Page 2 DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION Tuesday- 7 4-7 p.m. Focus on Thinking: Creating Thoughtful Learners IRC 4:30 - 7:30 p.m. Expand Your Outlook (E-Mail) Mabelvale Elem. 4:30 - 7:30 p.m. PowerPoint 97II IRC Achievement Level Test (ALT) Grades 2-11 All Sehools Wednesday- 8 Achievement Level Test (ALT) Grades 2 - 11 All Schools Thursday- 9 4:30 - 7:30 p.m. Expand Your Outlook (E-Mail) Mabelvale Elem. 4:30-7:30 p.m. Powerpoint 97II IRC Achievement Level Test (ALT) Grades 2-11 All Schools 5 p.m. - Board Agenda Meeting Board Room Friday- 10 Achievement Level Test (ALT) Grades 2 -11 All Schools Saturday-11 All Day S.E. Regional Odyssey Of the Mind Competition Lakewood MiddleMarch Calendar Page 3 DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION Monday- 13 4-7 p.m. Performance Assessment and the Use of Rubrics IRC 4:30-7:30 p.m. Excel 971 Mabelvale Elem. 4:30-7:30 p.m. Expand Your Outlook (E -Mail) IRC Tuesday-14 9-4 p.m. Learning to Cope w/Differences IRC 4-7 p.m. Computers 101 IRC 4:30-7:30 p.m. Expand Your Outlook (E-Mail) Mabelvale Elem. 6 p.m. - LRSD Biracial Committee Board Room Wednesday- 15 9-4 p.m. Learning to Cope w/Differences IRC 2-4 p.m. Senior High Nurses Meeting Parkview Thursday- 16 4-7 p.m. First Steps in Using the Internet IRC 4:30 - 7:30 p.m. Expand Your Outlook (E-Mail) Mabelvale Elem. Friday- 17 No Meetings ScheduledMarch Calendar Page 4 DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION Monday- 20 9 a.m. - Noon SECME (Bridge Bldg. \u0026amp; Portfolio Comp.) (Elementary Competition) Washington 9 a.m. SECME Secondary Competition Board Room 4-7 p.m. Cultural Diversity Techniques IRC 4:30 - 7:30 p.m. Expand Your Outlook (E-Mail) IRC Tuesday- 21 9-2 p.m. SECME Olympiad UALR 4-7 p.m. Computers 101 IRC 4:30 p.m. - Student Registration Appeals Committee SRO Conf. Room Wednesday- 22 1:30 p.m. - Principals Meeting Quality Foods Thursday- 23 6 p.m. - Board Meeting Board Room Friday- 24 8:30 -11 a.m. School Nurses Meeting 12-4 p.m. CPR- Adult and Child IRCMarch Calendar Page 5 DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION Monday- 27 No Meetings Scheduled Tuesday- 28 No Meetings Scheduled Wednesday- 29 No Meetings Scheduled Thursday- 30 Friday- 31 No Meetings Scheduled No Meetings ScheduledC - Ci= SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS MONTHLY CALENDAR f^MAY, 2000 D 2 4 2000 Off ICE OF desegregation MOHHORiHG DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION Monday-1 8:30-4 p.m. Smart Step Kickoff Summit Statehouse Conyention Cntr. Tuesday-2 8:30-4 p.m. Smart Step Kickoff Summit Statehouse Conyention Cntr. 6 p.m. - SECME Awards Banquet UALR Wednesday- 3 8:30 - Noon Diyision of Instruction Monthly Staff Meeting IRC Rm. 19 8:30-3 p.m. GT Teachers/lnyestigations IRC 8:30-4 p.m. Smart Step Kickoff Summit Statehouse Conyention Cntr. Thursday- 4 10 - Noon Supt. Student Cabinet Henderson Middle School Friday- 5 8-3 p.m. Elementary Counselors Board Room May, 2000 Page 2 DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION Monday- 8 4-7 p.m. Putting All the Pieces Together IRC Tuesday-9 NO MEETINGS SCHEDULED Wednesday-10 8:30 - 3 p.m. Sp. Ed Teachers/STC IRC 8:30-4 p.m. High School Counselors Mtg. Pulaski Tech. Admin. Board Rm. Thursday-11 8:30-4 p.m. Middle School Counselors Metro Actiyity Center 5 p.m. - Board Agenda Meeting Board Room Friday-12 NO MEETINGS SCHEDULED Monday-15 4-7 p.m. What Matters Most\" Henderson Tuesday-16 3-4 p.m. Pre-K Teachers/Shared Reading IRC 4:30- Student Registration Appeals Committee SRO Conf. Rm. Wednesday-17 NO MEETINGS SCHEDULED Thursday-18 8:30 - 1:30 p.m. 5 Grade Challenge Parkyiew Magnetr 4 . \u0026gt; May, 2000 Page 3 DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION Friday-19 8:30-1:30 p.m. 5 Grade Challenge Parkview Magnet Monday- 22 NO MEETINGS SCHEDULED Tuesday- 23 9 - 3:30 p.m. Learning to Cope w/Differences IRC Wednesday- 24 9 - 3:30 p.m. Learning to Cope w/Differences IRC Thursday- 25 9 - 3:30 p.m. Learning to Cope w/Differences IRC 2 - 3:30 p.m. Immunization Update (Dr. Richard Jacobs) Nurses, Secretaries, Principals AR Childrens Hospital Brandon Conf. Center 6 p.m. - Board Meeting Board Room Friday- 26 9 - 3:30 p.m. Learning to Cope w/Differences IRC Sunday- 28 TBA Baccalaureate All High Schools World OM University of Tenn. Knoxville, Tenn. Lr May, 2000 Page 4 DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION Monday- 29 NO MEETINGS SCHEDULED Tuesday- 30 9:30-11:30 a.m. Smart Start Quarterly Meeting IRC 6 p.m. - Parkyiew Graduation Barton Coliseum 8:30 p.m. McClellan Graduation Barton Coliseum Wednesday- 31 6 p.m. - J.A. Fair Graduation Barton Coliseum 8:30 p.m. - Hall Graduation Barton ColiseumCP SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS MONTHLY CALENDAR MAY, 2000 RECEiVED may 2 6 2000 DATE/TIME MEETING OFHCEOF DESEGREGATION MOMING LOCATION Thursday-1 Last Day for Students 7 p.m. - Central Graduation Barton Coliseum Friday- 2 School Nurses Record Exchange/Turn in Equipment Monday- 5 Last Day for Teachers 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. Professional Development School Level- Curriculum Mapping Individual Schools Tuesday-6 8:30-3:30 p.m. Social Studies Assessment Dev. IRC 8:30-3:30 p.m. Planning for High School Math Preschool Conference IRC 9 - 3:30 p.m. Learning to Cope w/Differences M.L. King Wednesday- 7 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. Social Studies Assessment Dev. Secondary Social Studies Teachers IRC 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. Career Action Planning Greater Second Baptist Church June. 2000 page 2 DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION 9-3:30 p.m. Learning to Cope w/Differences M.L King 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. Investigations-Coins, Coupons \u0026amp; Combinations (2\"'' Grade Teachers) IRC 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. Operation Primary Physical Science(OPPS) IRC Thursday- 8 8:30 - 3 p.m. Summer School Training M.L. King 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. Social Studies Assessment Dev. IRC 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. Operation Primary Physical Science (OPPS) IRC 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. End-of-Module Test Prep IRC 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. Investigations- From Paces to Feet IRC 9 - 3:30 p.m. Learning to Cope w/Differences M.L. King 10 - Noon T.I.P. Recognition Ceremony \u0026amp; Reception UALR 2-4 p.m. T.I.P. Recognition Ceremony \u0026amp; Reception UALR 5 p.m. - Board Agenda Meeting Board Room Friday- 9 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. Social Studies Assessment Dev. Secondary Social Studies Teachers IRC TBA Principals/Brokers Picnic TBAJune, 2000 Page 3 DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION Monday-12 Summer School Starts 8:30-3:30 p.m. New Textbook Adoption German Teachers IRC 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. New Textbook Adoption Latin Teachers (Or June 13) IRC 8:30-3:30 p.m. ESL Summer Academy Parkview 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. Computer Toolbox IRC 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. Integrating Internet into Instruction 2 Cool 4 School Henderson Chicot Tuesday-13 8:30-3:30 p.m. ESL Summer Academy Parkview 8:30-3:30 p.m. Computer Toolbox IRC 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. Integrating Internet into Instruction Henderson 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. Investigations - From Paces to Feet IRC 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. 2 Cool 4 School Chicot 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. Investigations - Coins, Coupons and Combinations IRC 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. Graphing Calculators 7\u0026gt;h \u0026amp; 8th Grade Teachers IRC 4:30 p.m. Student Registration Appeals Committee SRO Conference Room Wednesday-14 8:30-11:30 a.m. ESL Summer Academy Parkview 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. Computer IRC 8:30-3:30 p.m. 2 Cool 4 School ChicotJune, 2000 page 4 DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. STC - Land \u0026amp; Water 4\" Grade Teachers IRC 8:30-3:30 p.m. STC - Animal Studies 4* Grade Teachers IRC 8:30-3:30 p.m. End-of-Module Test Prep. 6th, ym, Qih Qpg^g IRC 12:30-3:30 p.m. ESL Summer Academy/B Parkview Thursday-15 8:30-11:30 a.m. New Textbook Adoption Spanish Teachers IRC 8:30-3:30 p.m. 2 Cool 4 School Chicot 8:30-3:30 p.m. ESL Summer Academy/B Parkview 8:30-3:30 p.m. STC- Ecosystems S' Grade Teachers IRC 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. STC- Floating and Sinking IRC Friday-16 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. 2 Cool 4 School Chicot 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. ESL Summer Academy/B Parkview Sunday-18 thur 23 Advanced Placement Summer Institute UALR/ Hot Springs Monday-19 8:30-3:30 p.m. Word 97 I IRC 8:30-3:30 p.m. New Textbook Adoption French Teachers IRC 8 - 3:30 p.m. Child Nutrition Department Workshop- Sanitation Washington 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. Middle School, Level II IRCJune, 2000 page 5 DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION Tuesday-20 8 - 3:30 p.m. Child Nutrition Department Workshop - Sanitation Washington 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. Middle School, Leyel II Middle School Eng. Teachers IRC 8:30-3:30 p.m. Plant Growth and Deyelopment/Assessment IRC Room 19 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. Plant Growth and Deyelopment/Assessment IRC Workroom 8:30-3:30 p.m. Excel 97 I IRC Computer Lab Wednesday- 21 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. 8:30-3:30 p.m. 8- 3:30 p.m. Thursday- 22 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. 8:30-3:30 p.m. 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. 8 - 3:30 p.m. 6 p.m. - Learning Eyerywhere - in and Out of School Pow/erPoint 97 I Middle School, Leyel II Middle School Eng. Teachers Child Nutrition Dept. Workshop-Child Nutrition II Middle School, Leyel II Middle School Eng. Teachers STC- Changes/Assessment STC-Changes/Assessment Child Nutrition Dept. Workshop - Main Dish Board Meeting Video Tape for check out IRC IRC Washington IRC IRC Room 19 IRC Work Room Washington Board RoomJune, 2000 page 6 DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION Friday- 23 8-1:30 p.m. Child Nutrition Dept. Workshop- Main Dish Washington 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. Middle School, Leyel 11 Middle School Eng. Teachers IRC Sunday- 25 - Wednesday- 28 8:30 - 4:30 p.m. AR Association of Superyision \u0026amp; Curriculum Arlington Hotel Hot Spring Sunday-25 - Friday- 30 Adyanced Placement Summer Institute- Math \u0026amp; Science UALR- Hot Springs Monday- 26 - Friday- 30 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. Reading/Writing Workshop Leyel I IRC Monday- 26 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. Word 97 II IRC 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. Integrating Internet into Instruction Henderson Tuesday- 27 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. Integrating Internet into Instruction Henderson 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. Excel 97 II IRC 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. STC- Plant Growth \u0026amp; Deyelopment Assessment IRC Rm. 19 8:30-11:30 a.m. 12:30-3:30 p.m. STC- Chemical Tests STC- Sound IRC IRC Wednesday- 28 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. PowerPoint 97 II IRCJune, 2000 page? DATE/TIME MEETING LOCATION Thursday- 29 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. STC- Changes/Assessment IRC 8:30-11:30 a.m. 12:30- 3:30 p.m. STC-Butterflies STC- Soil IRC IRC 8:30 - 3:30 p.m. Inspiration IRC Friday- 30 No Meetings ScheduledArkansas Democrat vTz (Gazette TUESDAY, AUGUST 6, 1996 . LRSD announces 1996-97 schedules Democrat-Gazette Staff Elementary school starting and I closing times in the Little Rock School District have been altered slightly for the coming school year for more efficient use of school buses. The following elementary- schools will start at 7\n40 a.m. and dismiss at 2:25 p.m.\nBadgett, Cloverdale, Franklin. Geyer Springs. Otter Creek, Romine, Wakefield, Williams, Woodruff, Booker, Fair Park, Fulbright, King, Rightsell, Terry, Watson and Wilson. These schools will start at 7:50 a.m. and dismiss at 2:35 p.m.\nBale. Brady, Chicot, Forest Park, Gibbs, Mabelvale, Meadowcliff, Pulaski Heights, Washington. Baseline. Can-er, Dodd. Garland, Jefferson. McDermott, Mitchell, Rockefeller and Western Hills, Hours for the secondary' schools will not change. Junior highs start at 8:45 a.m. and dismiss at 3:45 p.m. High schools start at 8:50 a.m. and dismiss at 3:45 p.m. with the e.xception of Park^ew Magnet High, which starts at 8:40 a.m. and dismisses at 3:45 p.m. Parents and students should notify their school or the districts Student Assignment Office, 324- 2272, as soon as possible if their address has changed. Current addresses are needed' to ensure bus routes and bus stops are accurate. Jrkansas Democrat (j^HZcttc TUESDAY, JANUARY 7, 1997 LR School Board to meet at Franklin i The Little Rock School Board is taking its monthly agenda meeting on the road this week to Franklin Incentive Elementary, 1701S. Harrison St The meeting will be at 5 p.m. Thursday at the school. The board usually meets at the administration building at 810 W. Markham St., but occasionally conducts a meeting at a school to encourage community interest in the district.Arkansas Democrat CBazctte FRIDAY, APRIL 11. 1997 School Board to hold 3 special meetings The Little Rock School Board plans three special meetings next week, two of them on the same night The board will meet at 6 p.m. Monday to select a company to help find a superintendent to replace Don Roberts, who wants to retire. At 7 p.m.. the board will play host to the Little Rock Board of Directors for a meeting on issues of mutual interest including a recent study of the district done by the University of Arkansas at Little Rock and a new program. Vital Link, where 500 sixth-graders will spend a week working in local businesses and government agencies. The board will meet again at 6 p.m. Wednesday at the request of a group of parents from Hall High School. The parents are concerned about the administration of Hall and suspension statistics indicating that black students at Hall are more likely to be disciplined than white students. Hall parents called the special meeting by using a state law that allows school district patrons to call a meeting by presenting a petition signed by at least 25 patrons. All the board meetings will be in the board room of the districts administration building, 810 W. Markham St.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_700","title":"Roberts, Don, Ph.D.","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1996/1998"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","School superintendents","School management and organization"],"dcterms_title":["Roberts, Don, Ph.D."],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/700"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nRoberts was Little Rock School District superintendent.\nCONTfNGENCY COMMITTEE REPORT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JULY 18, 1996 Rett Tucker and Roosevelt Brown, Co-chairmen Debbie Glasgow, Marian Lacey, Betty Mitchell, Skip Rutherford, John Walker Members of the School Board and citizens of Little Rock, my name is Rett Tucker and I am Co-chairman of the Contingency Committee approved by this Board earlier this year. Other members, who are present, include Co-chairman Dr. Roosevelt Brown, PTA Council President Debbie Glasgow, Mann Principal Marian Lacey, CTA President Betty Mitchell, fomier school board president Skip Rutherford and attorney John Walker. On behalf of Dr. Brown, let me begin by thanking the Board for putting your confidence and trust in us. We also want to thank th? committee members for their dedication and hard work. We met numerous times in the spring and put together the framework of a contingency plan in the event it was needed. We have had almost perfect attendance at every meeting. We took this assignment very seriously. We considered it an honor and an opportunity to participate in this very important process. We resolved from the beginning that we would put our differences aside and work toward consensus. When we were notified Sunday that Dr. Williams was going to Kansas City, we were prepared. To finalize our recommendations, we have met every day this week and now come before you with a recommended plan of action. 1This plan comes to you with our unanimous support. In fact, I must say that our committee-with strong wills, strong personalities, strong views and all the diversity we prize in Little Rocknever once had a split vote and never met an issue that we didnt resolve in a civil and thoughtful way. I have been part of many committees both personally and professionally, but this one has represented the best and most gratifying experience Ive ever had. Lets clarify first what we did not do. Although there has been a great deal of speculation, we did not consider the selection of a permanent Superintendent. That Was not our assignment. We do believe, however, that this is a very important decision in its own right because it comes at such a critical time. We focused on the short-term, although we define short-term as one to two years. Tonight, we have two major recommendations. Our first deals with getting through the next several days and weeks. In this regard, we congratulate Dr. Williams on his new position and wish him well. We thank him for his leadership and his service. This is a tough job. We recognize that and appreciate all he has done. Although Dr. Williams will remain on the payroll until September 1, we know that he will be spending a great deal of his time, his talent and his energy-as he should-on Kansas City and the future. 2While he will still be a very valuable resource for this school district, we proposefrom tomorrow through August 14, the formation of a five-person management team which would report directly to the Board. This team would operate in the same spirit that our Contingency Committee has operated: successfully addressing a short-term assignment. We spent a great deal of time and thought on the membership of this team. We looked for people with experience, with dedication and who had the energy to take on extra assignments. We recommend the following individuals: Dr. Victor Anderson would serve as the daily operations officer. He biings a wealth of experience as a principal, an administrator and, more importantly, as a person who is recognized as both a consensus builder and a team player. He would be in charge of day to day administration. Joining him on the team will be Sadie Mitchell, a former teacher, a former principal, and now an administrator, who has worked very closely with the elementary schools. Also, Jodie Carter, the principal of McClellan High School, who from first hand experience understands both the challenges and the opportunities of our senior high schools. Sadie will be in charge of all elementary schools and Jodie will have the responsibility for the senior high schools. The two other members come from our Contingency Committee. Let me add that neither sought a position on the team. In fact, both had to be drafted. 3Marian Lacey is the principal of Mann Junior High School. She is a principals principal and was such a positive voice on our committee. Marian knows the junior highs and her outstanding record at Mann speaks for itself. She will focus on all aspects of the junior high schools. Skip Rutherford, the only non-educator on the team, understands the school board better than most. He served on the Board from 1987 to 1991, as its president in 1989 and 1990 and coordinated two victorious millage campaigns. He will supervise communication and student assignments and will serve without pay. All of these members will continue to perform their current responsibilities. Marian Lacey will still be the principal at Mann and Jodie Carter will still be the principal at McClellan. Skip Rutherford will still work at Cranford Johnson Robinson Woods. Vic Anderson and Sadie Mitchell will still be district administrators. All of them, however, for the good of the district, will work on the management team which means extra duty and long hours for each of them. Please note that all four educators are or have been successful principals and the non-educator is a former school board member and president. The team is experienced. It needs to be because much will be happening over the next four weeksincluding the opening and beginning of school. We simply cant put this district on hold for that time period. This professional team addresses that issue. 4The second part of our recommendation relates to the position of Interim Superintendent. We considered many people and possibilities. We listened to board members and to interested citizens. We wanted to recommend someone who could provide effective, steady, experienced leadership\nsomeone with local ties who understands Little Rock, Arkansas and state school funding\nsomeone who could help this district and the Board in its search for a permanent Superintendent. We believe we have found that person. Tonight, we unanimously recommend to you. Dr. Don Roberts--the former Director of the Arkansas Department of Education and the former Assistant Superintendent of the Little Rock School District.-Dr. Roberts is an Arkansas native and was educated at Henderson State and the University of Arkansas. He served as State Education Director during the administrations of both Governor Bill Clinton and Governor Frank White. He has been a successful Superintendent in three urban school districts. We recommend him to you as Interim Superintendent for a minimum of one year and a maximum of two. This will give you the time, the breathing room and the opportunity to find the best Superintendent possible. As we know from experience, finding a Superintendent is not always a quick process. Dr. Roberts can and will help you in the search. He is 61 years old and retired in 1994 after seven years as Superintendent of the Fort Worth School District. This is a district with 72,000 students and 9,000 employees. Since that time, he has been doing consulting work with school districts across the country. 5He loves Little Rock, loves Arkansas, knows Little Rock and knows Arkansas. We sought him out for this position. He has always been dedicated to high quality desegregated education and seeks to build cooperation across racial lines. He is known as a person who keeps his word and works in good faith. He is an educator, an administrator and, we believe, a healer. He did not seek the job. We went after him. Dr. Roberts can be here tomorrow to meet with you individually and as a group. He can be in Little Rock and on the job no later than August 15. We also recommend the followins: When Dr. Roberts arrives on August 15, the management team will become an advisory team to him. Dr. Roberts would, of course, take over the day to day operations, but we envision the advisory team helping him on both a regular and as-needed basis. Their assistance in this transition will be invaluable. As I noted earlier, we believe Dr. Roberts should be given a one- year contract with the possibility of another year if needed. He has indicated he is not interested in the full-time Superintendents position, but, again, that subject is a matter for the Board to discuss at the appropriate time. We believe his compensation package should be comparable to that of Dr. Williams. 6V Dr. Roberts said it is extremely important to him that the citys leadership, the business community and other groups come together in support of the public schools. Weve seen a great deal of that happening already and tonight we have with us Mayor Dailey, other elected officials, city leaders, school patrons, parents and interested citizens who are here in support of quality desegregated public education in our city. As chairman of the Greater Little Rock Chamber of Commerce, I can pledge to Dr. Roberts, the board, and the management team, the Chambers continued support. The next two Chamber Chairmen, Doug Buford and Janet Jones, are here to back me up. Finally, and this is very important: to provide tfiis district with stability as it works its way through some difficult problems and prepares for the 21st century, our colleague and fellow committee member John Walker, has agreedin good faithto a two-year moratorium on initiating any new legal action against the school district related to the settlement agreement. Dr. Roberts expressed reservations to our committee about accepting a position in a district embroiled in litigation and controversy. This offer was made by Mr. Walker to Dr. Roberts because of Dr. Roberts past record in the Little Rock School District and the State Department of Education. This means that the Board, Dr. Roberts and the employees in the District, for the first time in almost 40 years, can concentrate totally and fully on educating our children and on implementing and, if necessary, modifying the current desegregation plan and getting out of court. 7These are our recommendations. We believe they serve as a sound and reasonable short-term plan. We also believe they serve as a new beginning for the district and a bridge to the future. It is amazing what we can accomplish when we work together. Madame President and members of the Board, the Contingency Committee respectfully requests your approval of these recommendations. Having discharged our duties and responsibilities, we have concluded our assignment and will disband as a committee following tonights meeting. We thank you for this opportunity to serve our school district and our city. Dr. Brown and I as well as members of the committee are now available to answer any questions you might haye. Thank you. C:\\wpwin61'wpdoc3\\aicker\\Supmntendent.78 8RECEPCP Dr. Don R. Roberts 7216 Johnstone Lane Fort Worth, Texas 76133 (817) 346-6253 JUL I 1996 f 5 Office of Deseflfegation Monito..:0 Dr. Don fi. Roberts, served as superintendent of the Fort Worth (TX) Independent School District from March 1987 to July 1994. Before assuming the post in Fort Worth, he was a teacher, principal, and later superintendent of Weston (OR) Public Schools. He has served as associate superintendent of the Little Rock (AR) Public Schools\nsuperintendent of Newport News (VA) schools\ndirector of the Arkansas Department of Education, and superintendent of the Amarillo (TX) Independent School District. He holds B.A. and M.S.E. degrees from Henderson State Teachers College, (AR), has done other graduate study at the University of Oregon, and holds an Ed.D. degree from the University of Arkansas. Dr. Roberts has developed the Fort Worth\nC^ (Community, Corporations, and - .- - - c is Classrooms) in cooperation with the Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce, the process to transform the FWISD through a variety of creative programs, educational restructuring, and school/business partnephips. Some of the initiatives under the c umbrella include: 0 The nationally recognized Vital Link program, which shows middle school students the connection between classroom achievement and workplace success, students and is The program began three years ago with 40 students. now a year-round activity involving 3,3Q0 Approximately 1,000 teachers have also been directly involved in Vital Link: 0 Equity 2000, a project with The College Board, that from the 1990- 91 to the 1993-94 school year. Sth and 9th grade enrollment in Algebra I showed a substantial increase. The enrollment increased from 2,850 to 5,626. Furthermore, by the end of the ninth grade more than 90% of all students had successfully completed Algebra I. Approximately 30% of the students made a \"B or better in the course: 0 Significant technology improvements such as TechLab 2000, which enables FWISD students in all high schools and middle schools to use computer networks to study new industrial technologies and eliminate out-of-date industrial arts-type programs\nApplied Learning activities, 0 including an Applied Learning Elementary School at Alice Carlson, and an Applied Learning Academy Middle School where students use the community as a resource and learn through hands-on activities in many locations\nPage 2 0 0 The New Standards Project, a national effort to define world-clys assessment standards and develop an examination system that includes student projects and portfolios of student work\nand The JCPenney High Performance Schools Project to train school personnel and parents in school'based decision making concepts tn FWISO schools. The District has become more open and more inclusive with strong emphasis on school-based decision iwking (SAW) and continued involvement and support of the Fort Worth ISD PTAs-PTOs, parents and the general coramunity. There are health collaboratives between ^^^5choo^ district and hospitals at three elementary schools. include the multi-age \"Connections\" program. .... . schools now offer year-round classes. The District s Adopt-A-School program has expanded with parent and connunity volunteers donating more than 575,000 hours to schools in 93-94. community. Early childhood initiatives On their own initiative, 12 Dr. Roberts has received many awards and honors, including twice being named one of the top 100 school chief executive officers by The Executive Educitor magazine. He was nationally recognized in Ndvenber, 1993 by the National Association of Partnerships in Education for his significant contributions to education reform and restructuring efforts. In April, 1994 Fort Worth won the Scholastic/National Alliance of Business Community in April, Award for Eacellence in Education. Following retirement from Fort Worth ISD in 1994, Dr. Roberts has worked with school districts in Arkansas and He several other states to implenent Vital Link programs. 1 has also represented Creative Learning Systems, Inc., developer and supplier of Technology Labs 2000 and other comprehensive laboratories for the study of science and technology.November, 1994 DON R. ROBERTS 7216 JOHNSTONE LANE FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76133 (817) 346-6253 TEACHING AND ADHIHISTRATIVE EXPERIENCES\nInstitution and Location Position Period Size Student/Emplovee Fort.Worth Ind. Sch. Dist. Fort Worth, Texas Superintendent 1987-94 72,000/9,000 Texas Christian University Superintendentin-Residence 1987-94 Amarillo Public Schools Amarillo, Texas Superintendent 1984-1987 27,500/3,200 Arkansas Dept, of Educ. Little Rock, Arkansas Director 1979-1984 450,000/1,600 Newport News Public Sch. Newport News, Virginia Superintendent 1974-1979 30,000/3,000 Little Rock Public Sch. Asst. Supt. Admn. Services and Pupil Services 1968-1974 23,000/2,000 Little Rock Public Sch. Little Rock, Arkansas Interim Deputy Superintendent 1967-1968 23,000/2.000 Weston Public Schools Weston, Oregon Superintendent 1959-1966 High Sch. Principal, Teacher, Coach 300/30 University of Arkansas Instructor Spring, 1970-1971Don\nR. Roberts page 2 FORMAL EDUCATION\nB.A. Economics Graduate Study Education M.S.E. Social Studies Graduate Study Education Ed. D. Educational Admn, Danforth NASE Fellow Henderson State Teachers College, 1958 Eastern Oregon College - Summer, 1959 Henderson State Teachers College, 1963 University of Oregon - Summer, 1965 University of Arkansas, 1969 1974 Selected and participated as one of 40 educational administrators from throughout the United States and Canada in an intensive two-month ^tudy program under the sponsorship of the Danforth Foundation and the National Academy for School Executives.Don R. Roberts page 3 RECOGNITION - HONORS, AWARDS. PRESENTATIONS, PUBLICATIONS (PARTIAL LIST]\n. \"Profile\" - School Administrator, November 1994 Community Award for Excellence in Education - National Alliance of Business/Scholastic Inc., 1994 McKee Award - National Association of Partnerships in Education, 1994 Outstanding Service to the Counseling Profession, N.C.T.C.A., 1993 Distinguished Library Service Award, Texas Association of School Librarians, March 1993 The College Board - \"Reducing the Education Deficit\", Equity ZOOO - conference participant, Washington, D.C. Hay 1993 Alliance Recrafting the Business of Schooling\" a JC Penney Compaiiy-Fort Worth Independent School District-National of Business Collaboration The Executive Educator 100 - Selected as one of The Top School Manaagers in the Nation, 1990 and 1993 it II What Superintendents Want From The Legislature And The Courts School Leaders Forum - University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, Hay, 1992 The College Board - Presentation to Foundations, Equity 2000 -New York, New York, April, 1992 Secretary of Labor - Press Conference SCANS - Washington D.C,, April, 1992 The College Board Regional Meeting, Equity 2000 - Fort Worth, Texas, February, 1992 The College Board National Forum - Equity 2000 - San Francisco, California, November, 1991 - NSBA, \"Grow Your Own - Alternative Certification\" San Francisco, California, April, 1991 Center for Creative Leadership Chief Executive Officer Leadership Development Program, 1990, 1991Don R. Roberts page 4 REC06NITIQW - HONORS. AWARDS, PRESENTATIONS, PUBLICATIONS (PARTIAL LIST)\nThe Danforth School Administrators Fellowship Program, 1987-1988 The Academy for Educational Leadership - Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas 1986, 1987, 1988 \"Improving the Climate for Learning\", Irving Independent School District, Irving, Texas 1985 \"Improving Student Achievement Through Outcome-Based Schools\", NASE Seminar, Boston, Massachusetts, 1985 Basic Skills: General Leadership Workshop\", Educational Service Center - Region.X, Richardson, Texas, 1985 Arizona Principals Institute, Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, Arizona, 1984 i Secondary School Recognition Panel, Department of Education, Washington, D.C., 1983 n Improving Student Achievement\", NASE Seminar, San Francisco, California, 1983 Member of Who's Who in American Colleges and Universities Student Body President - Henderson State Teachers College Distinguished Alumnus - Henderson State UniversityDon R. Roberts page 5 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS fPARTIAL LIST)\n0 Member of Executive Board - New Standards Project 0 Member Board of Trustees - The CoHege Board 0 Texas Association of School Administrators 0 Texas Center for Educational Research - Board of Trustees 0 American Association of School Administrators 0 Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development 0 Association for Childhood Educational International 0 Phi Delta Kappa 0 Horace Mann League I 0 Congress of Parents and Teachers - Texas and Virginia COMMUNITY SERVICES (PARTIAL LIST)\n0 United Way Board of Directors 0 Collaborative Leadership Development Program 0 Leadership Forum Fellow - Fort Worth 0 Rotary PROFESSIONAL CREDENTIALS\nTexas - Professional Superintendent Arkansas - Social Studies, Secondary, and Administrator Virginia - SuperintendentLRSD ADMIN. BULDING F.a\\: I-501-32d-20: Jul 19 '96 11:41 P. 02/0i Little Rock School District Press Conference Interim Superintendent Dr. Don Roberts July 19, 1996 For more information: Suellen Vann. 24-2020 Little Rock School District interim superintendent Dr. Don Roberts will hold a press conference today at 1:00 p.m. School board members and LRSD manacement team members also will attend the press conference. The press conference wall be held in the Board Room of the Administration Building, 810 West Markham. ### 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, .Arkansas 72201 (.501)324-2000iP-H- - '^rp T ,-'C 1?5 PC12 H'JS 5e , 14:09 Dr. uon ii. Roberts 72IS Johnstone Lane fort !rLn, Texas 7513,? (^:.7} 34C-6253 Ct. f\non R, Ruterts, Inaepihidert Schoo! u-,su ict -r.-m narrn h3/ to Juv, 1994 Before 111 fort ^worth. ns was a tcachar, pr{nripa\\ and later 4!sst,(nilng t-is poit ~.--v.,..,..y u.m S(jr,e\u0026gt;-\u0026lt;r.tQ'c!unt sfe'vad as superintc.-ident of the Fort inorth (''Xl s*r,rt Narrh I\u0026lt;?37 to duly, 1954 - - ' DisUict , . , Weston (3H) f\"j3ic Schac'^s superHitandent of the nt 01 He ^a5 server* as isscciats iii -^OCk (AR) Public Schools\nsuper!nter,dsn* i,Vn, schools\ndirector of the Arkansas Denartmert (TX) IrdapeMent Schco' '' :2''^ oeyrees from Henderson State Teachers and h^lds V 'idivensity ct Crsgon. ano noias a., td.D. decree froir. tne University of Arkansas Newport Nows Edecotiort, Cl of ^1 deve.op^c the ren wc-th' t (tomnunity, Corporations t.asu.bueisj tf. couperatinn with the Fort Worth Chamber of Co.-rmerce the process to triiisforr me fki\u0026gt;U chreugh a va, ,vi- r tre e.-jeat!final reslr uctur jng. 400 sthool/b'isi.ness psrtnonship\n, , i:.a is variety of creative programs, Some qC th? init:4{ives uiui^r the C umbreiia ircluoe- 0 0 0 workplace SL'ccfss itUdirntJ students i 11X 01 /eC lecogaiZgp V'lT.a'' link program, which shows miuglc. tonriPttisr. bewce.n ciaisrocn, aphieverent and ... reyah three years ago wth 40 (jiiiJd'le ano is r.pM ,4 ynar-fubncl activity invoUi.-.T 3 390 tsarhers have also been diractlv ifi Vitai tinx\n4 year f'jbncl fqvSty ZODD, witii The toiiege i^oard, that from the 1990- *1 sefisc' ysar, Stn anj gvn grade enrnlinent if, '\".'c\u0026lt;,Mru shnwed a Subsantul increase from 2,3%a to 5,676 91 to tn\nFij'\"the.\"iio'\"^, 1 fl j The ehroHfuert increcfsec! by the ena of the ninth grade mors than 90, of 31 i students hod success^u' 1 v cc-roloted AloGCrs Approximateiy 3in o'^ the studenrs raade a '\u0026gt; vr better in the rour.s\n' I Siyniftcart ethnotosy itnprovar.cnt$ sucn ^tynirt^aft ethno\u0026gt;osy itufirove.'i'.cnt$ suer 33 'echi4rt jgQo rao\ne3 fWlSD students in all high schorls and middle 5 use computer n?t*'crki t.c study n^w indusfrig'! \u0026lt; J,- e. ira.natg cut-of-date industrial arts-tyDe pregrar.s, i-r 3!i wh i ch Choo's to tef\nhno''ogios and ivit\u0026gt;fs, an Applied learning fjtmfen.ofy \u0026gt;chool at AHce Cur'ior, ina in Appiic-d Lsarninq Acaceiry H'ldoie Sciioof where students us? the cenmumtv 35 a resource and e^rr. througn hands-cri activities in .'nany 'ocaticns\nleafni05 nd \"ear activnihi including ira Appi1pd use the ccnmunity 35 .c \u0026gt;jFr ICt 195 H!JG ' 96 14: eg 0 c Page 2 The Wert Stt\u0026lt;j3-d5 Prcjsct. a natuinat effort ic def'\nne war'.d-cUss assess?fit standards .y .\u0026lt;.j d- ew^Jnp an exaSinatian system that includes student proerts portfolios cf student wank\nand The jr,Pe*irey High Perfovnafce st^cwils project to train school personnel and carrnts in school-hosed decision eiakmg concepts in rwisc schools. The District has becc.-*? wre open and laone inclusive with strong emphasis on school iiset! deciSion 'taki'\u0026gt;g (SSC**) and toAliwued involve-'nent and supp-.rt of the fort Wd-th .SO FTAs PlUs, p-ents and the general There a^^ health coraWirativE.s between the school district tariy childnood initiatives coomunity. ard iivspitJls it thres elewptary schools. Ir.rludi- th? BuUi-ige \"Can,igctsons\" program, Un tneir own initiative, 12 schools co* offer year-rriird classes, Ihe District's Adopt*A-School prcgfs has expanded fith parent ccnwjmty voiunteeri donating more than S?5.tK\u0026gt;C hours to srhoois in 93'54 Pr. Hoberts has rt-z^^vpt} many sMargs and honors. inc1u4n9 twice being named on* of the top lUO schnol chief executive officers by ZAe Ixvcuti^e fdf/catijr oagiiilne. He wa?. nationally recogniied in November. 1953 by the hatiortl Association af Pa-'lnrrsilip? Fducation for nis significant centrib'Jtions to ?ijucti3n reforw and restructuring efforts. Jn April, 19P4 Fort Worth won the ScholasJ\u0026lt;/\u0026lt;atinna' aPianee of Business Cnmunty /M^rd for excellence m Educator, Dr. Foliovino retirewer.t I rort) ~ort Werth ISO in 1594 , Pyterts has wotVeel witn school districts in Ai-kaneas and eevex^si other states to iwpicjment Vical uin'K programs. has .also ropresnnted Creative Le^rhing SystaCuS, Inc He deve-oper and supplier of Techoologry r.abs 2C00 and other come-to,hen si ve laboratories for the study of soieno and tec.hKo.l cgy. .1' I HI I iN hiili imi LITTLEROCK is IA rSi FOR OUR PUBLIC SCHOOLS RECF'a SEP 1 1 JS3Z OFFICE Of SIC Bi RESOLUTIOR'w*R14Lf^ Qnnes Together OF APPRECIATION JOINTLY ADOPTED BY THE LITTLE ROCK ALLIANCE FOR OUR PUBLIC SCHOOLS AND THE EDUCATION COMMITTEE OF THE GREATER LITTLE ROCK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WHEREAS Dr. Don Roberts has served this community in a leadership role as the Superintendent of the Little Rock School District, and WHEREAS his leadership has lead to significant improvements in the health of the District, and WHEREAS his seasoned approach to managing the District has reinforced a sense of trust and commitment among its patrons, and WHEREAS his strategic focus throughout his tenure has stayed fixed upon an overriding goal of whats best for the education of all of Little Rocks young people, and WHEREAS our community, as represented by the Little Rock Alliance For Our Public Schools and the Greater Little Rock Chamber of Commerce, will benefit from Dr. Roberts hard work and commitment for decades to come. The Board of Directors of the Little Rock Alliance For Our Pubhc Schools and the Education Committee of the Greater Little Rock Chamber of Commerce do hereby adopt this special resolution in appreciation of Dr. Don Roberts, for his tireless efforts to provide stability and improvement to UUU RuUCl USj ivx uii. vxwuu r the operation of the Little Rock School District as its Superintendent. ADOPTED THIS ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, NINETEEN HUNDRED AND NINETY SEVEN. Baker Kumis President, Little Rock Alliance For Our Public Schools Hubert Barksdale Chairman of Education, Greater Little Rock Chamber of CommerceArkansas Democrat ^(Gazelle FRIDAY, JULY 19, 1996 Board 1 Schools name interim leader with ties to LR BY CYHTHIA HOWELL Oemocral-GazBtle Education Writef Dr. Don R. Roberts, a retired Fort Worth, Texas, superintendent with deep Arkansas roots, is set to become interim superintendent of the Little Rock School District beginning Aug. 15. The Little Rock School Board voted unanimously to appoint Roberts to the position Thursday during a meeting in which civil rights attorney John Walker, as a show of support for the move, offered a two-year moratorium on, any new legal action against the , district related to the 1989 de-' segregation plan. Announcement of the moratorium prompted a standing ovation and cheers from the audience of more than 100 business leaders, government officials, parent activists and district employees. See BOARD, Page 12A Cooiiouod ftom Pago 1A lloborls, (H. wa.s a Lillie Rock assistant superintendent in the units and director of Ilie stale Department of Education under Govs. Bill Clinton and Frank While. He ha.s been nationally recognized for his Icadersliip in educational programming. in Fort Woi'th. Roberis mini- aged a district of 72.11011 studeuLs and 9.009 employees. When lie retired two years ago. the president of the Fort Worth teachers union wa.s (luoted a.s saying she ilid not believe Roberts had\ni single enemy. Roberts will replace Dr. Henry Williams, 54, who iilans to become superiiilendenl of public schools in Kansas City, Mo., by the first of September. I want to help, Roberts said jp a telephone interview from lii.s home in Fort Worth. Ive always had an allegiance to Lillie Bock. i\nPending the outcome of contract negotiations, Roberts will sei-ve as interim superintendent for at least one and possibly two years while tlie school board looks for someone to fill the job permanently. ij He was reconiniended to the .school board Thursday night by 4 high-profile citizens' commit- lee that has been working since spring to develop a plan for teni- jSorarily filling the vacancy they ttiought might occur in the superintendent's position. T We considered many people dnd possibilities, Rett Tucker, 'co-chairman of Ihe cominittec, told the board Thursday. . Dr. Roberts loves Little Rock, loves Arkansas, knows Lit- lle Rock and knows Arkansas, Tucker said. \"We sought him out fpr thi.s position. He has always been dedicated to high-ciuality xtesegregated education and Spek.s to build cooperation across raci!d lines. He is known ,as a person who keep.s hi.s word itnd works in good faith. He is ... we believe, a healer. The board also agreed Thursday to establish a management tpam to oversee operation of the district until RoberLs assumes .tlie job. The team, which will report, directly to the board, will begin its work today. r The appointment of that team elTeetiveLv end.s Williams supervision of the Little Rock district, although he will serve in an advisory role and draw his salary Until he officially resigns.\nMembers of the team include foUKdistrict employees, all with e$p^ricncc a.s principals, and (5n4 former school board president. ' The learn members are Dr. Vjc Anderson, assistant superintendent for secondary schools\nSadie Mitchell, assistant superihtendcnl for elementary schools\nMarian Lacey, principal at Mann Magnet Juniur High\nJodie Carter, principal at McClellan High: and Skip Rutherford, former board president and a public relations executive. Anderson will oversee day-to- day operations of the school district. Lacey, Mitchell and Carter will work with the schools. Rutherford, who will serve without pay, will focus on student as- signiiieiil 1111(1 coiiiiiiiiiiicalioiis. All Hie team members will take on the duties in addition to their rurrenl jobs. Aller making the personnel recoiiniiendalions, Tucker an- nouuced the moratorium offered b.v Walker, who represents black families in the district's 13-year- old school desegregation lawsuit. \"Thi.s offer wa.s made b.v Mr. Walkc'r to Hr. Robert!! because of Hr. Roberts' past record in the Little Rock School District and the state Department of Education. Tucker told the board. Thi.s inean.s that the board. Dr. Roberts and the employees in the district, for the first time in almost 40 years, can concentrate totally and fully on educating our children and on implementing and, if necessary, modifying the current desegregation plan and getting out of court,\" he said. At a break in the meeting. Walker praised Roberts, whom he has known since the 1960s. My commitment is to Dr. Roberts and what he stands for and the record he has in this district, Walker said. Dr. Roberts was here during the hard days. He demonstrated he was committed to the princi- ples of desegregation. lie showed it by example and personal witness. 1 do not know of a single thing that he ever did or said that would be racially divisive. I think someone like him has to have a chance, Walker said. The moratorium, while not unprecedented, is rare. It is significant because Walker routinely charge.s the district with violating provisions of its desegregation plan. Those charges lead to time-consuming federal court hearings. Walker said the moratorium will not negate the challenges already pending before U.S. Dis- trict Judge Susan Webber Wright. Rut some of the issues might now be negotiated bC-' tween him and the (listi'ici, making some of the court hearings and judicial orders unnecessary. Walker, who was a member of the contingency committee, said Roberts was tire group's first and only choice for the interim position. The committee recommended Roberts be given a contract similar to the one that paid Williams $115,000 a year. Roberts said Thursday he first talked to contingency committee members in April, but only in an advisor.v capacity. He said he wasn't interested in the job then. But when the committee members called him earlier this ' week, he said he would take the interim position if the board supported it unanimously and the busines.s community demonstrated support for the district. He said he wa.s sympathetic to the counuillees desire to stabilize the district, and he pointed out that this is the wrong time of year for a (piick search for a permanent superintendent. Roberts, who will be in Little Rock today to meet with board members and staff, grew up in NcNeil, in Columbia County. He earned a bachelors degree in economics and a masters degreeArkansas Democral-Gazettc/KAREN VANDONGE Civil rights lawyer John Walker talks Thursday with Marian Lacey, principal at Mann Magnet Junior High, as a Little Rock School Board audience applauds news that Walker won't file any desegregation-related complaints against the district for two years. He made the pledge in response to a board decision to hire Dr. Don Roberts of Fort Worth, Texas, as interim superintendent. in social studies from what is and hands-on instruction add now Henderson State University fostered a system of schoOlin Arkadelphia, and received a based decision making. ,t. *9* doctorate in educational admin- of Roberts three adult istraUon from the University of children live in Little Rock. One Arkansas at Fayetteville. son, Jon Roberts, attended the He first became a superinten- school board meeting Thursday dent al age 29 in a tiny comniuni-ty in Oregon. He served as assis-night. The other son, Dqn Roberts Jr., stayed at home jo tant superintendent in Little hold the telephone receiver next Rock between 1967 and 1974. He was superintendent of Newport News, Va., public schools between 1974 and 1979, when then- Gov. Clinton appointed him di-to the television .iso his father ,0' could hear newsireports about the board meetingj Also Thursday,' board mem-rSecto ro fo Ef dthuec afAlorkna nsas Denart- tractubarli eoflbyl idgiastciounsss etdo tWheililri acmohs,- ment ot Education. superintendent since 1993. In 1984, he left Arkansas to be ... ., superintendent in Amarillo, Attorneys for the district and Texas, for three years. He served Williams had-'been negotiating 7'/2 years as Fort Worth's super- early end to his contract even intendent. While there, he initi- before the Kansa^ City job offer. ated academic programs that at-\n]Price GardnerTan attorney for traded national attention. J the district, said Williams had Under one program, the num- sought a payment of more thqn her of students^taking and pass- $200,000 from the district to end ing algebra in Fort Worth almost his contract. That 'includedna doubled. Another program, now duplicated in North Little Rock and other Arkansas districts, in$ 60,000 bonus that he was notJo get unless he stayed in the dis-trict until September 1998. 't Eager to keep the meeting lip-volved placing young adoles- beat, board members took no ap-cenls in various businesses and industries for a short time so they could see how academics are applied in the workplace. tion on the issue Thursday, saying they could meet with Williams next week to iron out the details of his transition from Ile also increased technology Little Rock to Kansas City. I I kiKaiiMs lyviiHKial iWiOpazvdv SAI UfJDAY. JULY 20, 1996 Intel iiii cliief of schools tells team: Carry on Roheils BY Cl inis HEINOLDS OntixKial Gn7Pllf' 3lnH Witlcr Little Rock'.s interim school siipeiiritendenl told a temporary nianagemeid team I' liday Io op erate the distiict as it's been run d!ig until In* takes over next month. Hnlil Dr Dim R. Robiutsstail.s Aug. 15. the Lillh* Rock .School Board ha.s established a manage ment learn of four ediicalors and OIK* businessman to ovrrser* IIk\nOpel atiini of the district. The ap poinlmenl of the team elfeclively ends Dr. Ilenr.v Williams' super vision of the Little Rock district allhongh In* will serve in an advisory mle ami draw hi.s salary until he ofllcially resigns. Williams has been in Kansas (.'ity, Mo., Ihi.s week ami may return to Litth Rock Sunday. There was no word Friday whether he had negotiated a contract with of- ficials there, and Little Rock ) Sen nOBERIS, Page 9A * CoolioiiP'l hoin Paeje t A boaul noiidans were unsure it he planned to show up for work Monday. If be (Willianisi is hen* Mon flay, I want to talk Io him,\" team mtunln'r Dr. Vic Anderson said. We're not tiying to usurp bi.s an Ibfuily. The Imard askefl n.s Io pnivido the liansilion Irom Dr. Williams. Un's nia\u0026lt;b a caicei \u0026lt;!' cisifm. If any ptdbh'in.s arisf', Ainh'r ag.ed a di.-ilrict \u0026lt;if 72.(K)() sindetifs and (inphiyees. 'Last Sunday afternoon, I was onlsidi' playing wilh my two gi mxlkids in I'Oll Wculh.\" Roberts said. Monday morning Ihing.s changed.\" Although Roberts said he was unprepared for a ncw.s coiifer- (*nce. Ids remarks and easygoing style evoked applause and amens of approval. I in going to work wilh Ibis board and Ibis community Io pro vide I he best education for the children who go to the Little son snid lie cxpocls Ilie sfhool Uovk public schools.\" he snid. bojiKl Io work it Old will! Williams. Wf'v(! ben \u0026lt;h?i rijcd wilh the responsilul ity of moving forward.\" Tlie manage ment team hud died hriday with its future (inai'terback I\" L ' jII Robeits and planned for the big game, School slarl.s in one inonih. You know what ha.s Io be done to get school started, Robeits saifL 'I'he team members are Anderson, assistant snperin t(*ndenl for secoinlaty schmds\nSadie Mitchell, assistant superintendent for elementary schools\nMarian Lacey, principal at Mann Magnet .Innior llidh\nJodie (barter, principal at Mc\u0026lt;'lellan High Scimol\nand Skip Ruth(*i- ford. former board president and a public relalion.s executive. Anderson will overset* day to day operation.s of Ihe school dis- Irict. ami the other edncaliou.s will work wilh the .schools. Rutherford will focus on commu uicatiou inside ami outside the disirict and student school as signments. Rutherford said Ihe leam will guide the district belwecfi now and when Ihe new superintendent lakes the wheel. Fridays first meeting was orderly and organized rh'spite Hie absence of a (listrici ebifd. We're doing what we would normally do. Anderson said. The p(!ople that open Ihe schools are not the superinten dent. Fresh off Hu* plane fnmi Texas, Roberts eascfl into bi.s role al a news conference Friday by letting busines.s leaders ami eflucalors km)W lu^ is not here to fix the schools. When Roberts beaded Hu* F(rt Worth schools, business leaders asked him how he would fix the schools. Roberts replied, I can't do anything al)oul il. I dfui'l know what io do ... but I said we can do something about il. The laid back Texan with Ar- Itobert.s said ht.s philosophy of education is to teach kids to dream, but he understands that not all student.s will end up at the Massachusells Institute of Technology. Lvmy kid who wakes up anywhere in the world has the right to dream about being a high achiever.\" Roberts said. Ann Brown, a federal court-appointed desegregation monitor, called Hoberls wonderful.\" We're very fortunate to have his view of the world,\" Brown said, lies down-home folk, and we can relate to that. Roberts said he had no immediate plan.s for hiring staff but did note that the districts' top t hree positions are vacant. I'm ready to try to provide any assistance and help to you that I can. Hoberls said. So the next time you hire a superinten (lent you can pick from the cream of the crop.\" Roberts said his contract with the district will be similar to Williams except a.s an interim superintendent, he won't rcipiire any bonus clause. Williams' contract set an annual salary of bonuses. and provision.s for Frank Marlin, Little Rock Classroom T(*achers Associalion executive ilirector, said (he buzz aboul Roberts is positive. Ue has a laitl-back style and seem.s to be firm in hi.s comic lions.\" Martin .Said. Board member Dr. Katherine Mitchell agreed. Dr. Roberts can do very well if Ihe boanl lets him do his job.\" I said Mitchell who has been a strong supporter of Williams. While she wa.s satisfied wilh the committee s choice. Mitchell said Williams should have been notified of the management team. Pending the outcome of con tract negotiations. Roberts will serve as interim superintendent for one and possibly two years while the school board looks for someone Io fill the job permanently. 'i'he board has not announced when or how the permanent superintendent search will be conducted. Roberts was recommended to Kansas roots expects the same support in Little Rock. The Little the school board by a citi zens ................................ committee that has been working Rock School Board voted unani- nionsly 'I'hur.sday for his appoint since spring to develop a plan for ment, and he received a standing temporarily filling the vacancy, ovation Friday when he was in trofiuced at the afternoon new.s conference at district headcpiar- teis. When 1 move on. 1 hope you'll still stand up.\" Roberts said. Roberts. 61, was a Little Rock assistant superintendent in the 1970s and director of the state Department of Education under (ovs. Bill (Jlinton and Frank White. He has l)een nalionally recognized for hi.s hmdersbip in educational programming. In Fort Wfuth. Rolu'ils man-Retired? No, just on recess School was out 2years for Roberts BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrai-Gazette Educaoon Wnter Dr. Don R. Roberts told colleagues and friends in Fort Worth two years ago when he retired as school superintendent that he wanted to rest but would return to work someday. Still. Roberts associates in Texas were surprised by the news last week that hes returning to a superintendents position, this time in Little Rock. Dr. Roosevelt Brown, a Little Rock dentist and co-chairman of the school districts citizen contingency committee, first contacted Roberts about the possibility last April. The committee was working on ideas for replacing Dr. Henry Williams, who they knew was like- his sons, who live in Little Rock, ly to leave the superintendents called to say that Williams had job at any time. Roberts told Brown he wasnt Mo. After more telephone con-interested. But he agreed to meet versations with Brown and other with the group on an advisory ba- committee members during the sis. week, Jan Roberts heard her hus- He didnt think much about band give his permission over the job until last weekend when the telephone to submit his name 1 Democrat (gazette F ------SUNDAY, 1996 ------------- Arxansas Democral-GazsneZSTATON BREDENTHA, Don Roberts talks Friday about his return to Little Rock, where the proud Papa\" will be near two granddaughters. accepted a job in Kansas City, to the board. Roberts is a former assistant superintendent in Little Rock and a former director of the Department of Education. Pending the finalization of his contract, Roberts will serve at least one year and maybe longer in Little Rock while the school board searches for a permanent replacement I thin! he always wanted to be a part o. the Little Rock School District Jan Roberts said about her husband. It was just that there wers other things in the way or othe\nthings to do. Helping to lure the Robertse\nSee ROBERTS, Page 8E 8B Roberts Continued from Page 10 to Little Rock are two young granddaughters, the children of their sons, Don Jr., a respiratoby therapist at Baptist Medical Center, and Jon, who works at Landers Auto Sales Co. Daughter Susan Robbins, 32, a school librarian, lives in Fort Worth with her minister husband and two children. The Robertses are known as Papa and Mimi to their grandchildren. Hes excited about this move and Im thrilled about it, Jon Roberts said last week. Asked why his father would come oift of retirement for such a job, Jon Roberts said, My dad loves kids more than anything in the world. Anything he can do for a child, he is willing to do. Hell do a good job for Little Rock. tenure, he turned that around. He Business Community Award for also worked to equalize Fort Excellence in Education. ing veteran teachers pass a basic --------------------- skills test to keep their jobs, , . - . ------- Donna Parker, vice president Roberts said he would implement salaries paid in the suburban of the Fort Worth Chamber of the test because it was law. He got school districts. Commerce and its chief adminis- t .................... When Dr. Roberts came to trative officer, said that as the re- Fort Worth, there was not a soul suit of Roberts leadership, the .vAa,... uv.u.c , who had a good thing to say about schools had become responsive to actually given in 1985. the schools, Steve Palko, a for- the needs of the business commu- ~ ......... mer member of the Fort Worth nity and vice-versa. School Board, said Friday. Now ................... Worth teacher salaries with people are excited about the schools. He caused people to have faith. _ - Fort Worth Assistant Superin- He listened to us because he the process started but became superintendent in Amarillo, Texas, in 1984 before the test was Fayetteville Superintendent Bobby New. who once worked for Roberts at the department, knew we would get the students in praised him as a visionary able to our companies when they com- ................... - * pleted school, Parker said. He was intense and deliberate, and tendent Joe Ross called Roberis a he did what was good for kidk hands-on superintendent, espe- .................. ........... daily on matters pertaining to the move his vision from the boardroom to the classroom. Roberts was the fifth of five children in his family in McNeil. As a Little Rock district admin- ... .--------------- istrator in 1967 to 1974, Roberts district's budget. was credited with almost single- He would do his superinten- handedly designing and imple- denfs duties during the day, but menting the districts federal at about 4:30 in the afternoon he court-ordered, cross-town busing umwiwv. iw was mwr- would call in the district s finance system for desegregation in 1971, rupted by a two-year stint as a Ma- people, and they would work on which affected students in grades budget planning until two or three six through 12. in the morning, Ross said. He His parents operated a dairy for a while. Later his father was an of- fice manager for a construction company. Roberts left McNeil to attend what is now Henderson State University. That was interrine in Korea in 1953 and 1954. He retunied to Henderson, So after a vacation on the knew where every dime beach in North Carolina, Roberts \"\" ' . . . .. ----------.- One day we had one bus for where he pitched on a team that got down to counting pennies. He transporting orthopedically handi- won the AIC chanipionshio He knew where Him, was. capped kids, Roberts recalled, tried to play football but quit after Seventeen days later we were won the AIC championship. He When Roberts announced his recognized^trict of 72,000 stu- nizations in the district bought a well. During that^tZ hralZmetZ hrwaspaid^220( aZr'nri! At the end of the 1971-72 school marrifd. tnSa-W^his wifrwho moving to a district of 25,000 stu- FrmX,\ni,c\n\"tT-----J/Tu\"? At the end ofthe 1971-72 school married, in 1958, his wife, who fort worth Star-Tetegram\" to thank year, a group of parents honored . ~ . him for his 35 years of service to Roberts for his work by present- grew up in Delight. Roberts taught junior high a year in Welch, La., before the young family moved to Oregon to dents that has experienced falling students. ing him with a miniature school enrollment, public criticism, He ccuIJ ao Luo and uic li dwindling funds and a 13 year old long as he wanted to stay, Palko ing, or BuD. ....................... wiirk in a frozen foods rnr^nanv desegrega .on laj^ - for a said. ' In different capacities in Little Robet^S inSon salary of about $115,000 a year. ................. . nuqeiu. imeiiuon He could have been here as bus and the title of Doctor of Bus- !rj r u XL J. . . , . : X., ixuMciLs itiienuuii was to earn Under Roberts, the district, in Rock, Roberts also handl^ stu- enough money to go back to Ar- ooerahon nitvs eham- a,Hiwow ------- to attend law school. That ~ . .J , ... X vx.w UUUJVb, XO XIVVIV, llUUCI W (lldU lldllUlCU tU- Robem said last week that cooperation with the citys cham- dent disciplinary matters, super- | vised principals, developed the did3? haDDenwead''he^^^ rested and played with his grand- ject C-Cubed. which is made up of budget and served as chief nego- children. He also did consulting programs to prepare children for tiator in bargaining the annual for school districts and represent- the workplace. C-Cubed short teacher contract ed an instructional computer com- for Community, Corporations and pany. He continues to serve on Classrooms became a national some national education boards. - - - - during his brief retirement he ber of commerce, developed Pro- wife took teaching jobs in Weston. He conceded that retirement took some getting used to after the After a five-year stint as super- , , ----------------- intendent in Newport News, Va., pawwm model. Educators from more than Roberts returned to Arkansas, *\n, at age 29 a dozen states, as well as foreign this time as the director of the'-' Oree First a teacher and a coach, Robe^ capped his seven-year ca- reer in Oregon by becoming superintendent of the little district rigors of being an urban superin- duplicate it in their schools, tendent. His wife joked that his re- ...... ' countries, studied the program to General Education Division of the The family returned to Arkan- sas so Roberts could get his doctor- Little Rock residents have to newed interest in household af- look no further than across the Ar- fairs took some adjustment on her kansas River to see one such pro- Frank White and then Clinton . ----------------------------... jxxw again. P n . . . During his tehure,'Roberts in- Roberts, 61, has aged well since School District last year adopted stigated a training program titled he last uyed in Arkansas. He lost Fort Worths Vital Links program. Program for Effective Teaching the pipe he always used to smoke. Seventh-graders, supervised by or PET. Virtually every adminis- teachers, spend a few days of their trator and teacher in the state at- state Department of Education ate at the University of Arkansas at under Gov. Bill Clinton, then Gov. ............................................. Fayetteville. He then took ^e job of interim deputy superintendent gram. The North Little Rock His brown hair is thinner and grayer, but not much. He is tall, standing 6 feet 3 inches. Uis summer vacation performing jobs tended workshops where key com- - -------- in local businesses and industries. ' \" ................... tanned face highlights the blue The purpose is to show the stu- eyes behind his glasses. dents how lessons they learn in On Friday, he wore a dark suit school are actually applied in and starched white shirt with red- businesses. in Little Rock, working while Paul Fair, who held that position tlien, went to get his doctorate. Roberts intended to stay on the Little Rock job a year but stayed seven years, serving as an assis- tant superintendent under Super- ponents of successful instruction intendents Floyd Parsons and were identified and practiced. - Also during Roberts tenure, the statewide student testing pro- then Fair. Fair, now executive director of the Arkansas Retired Teachers and-blue print tie when he attended a news conference in Little Other C-Cubed initiatives in ----- ---------- Fort Worth led to more students Rock. He wore dark dress shoes, taking and passing Algebra I and not Western boots.----------------------the increased use of technology as Roberts speaks slowly and with a tool for acquiring academic little inflection. But speaking to skills, Roberts said. the school board, district employ- ..................... gram was started and scores were Association, said Friday that he publicized, gifted-and-talented ed- was overjoyed to learn of Roberts ucation was developed, including intentions to return to the school the Governors School for Gifted 1 dont want to scare evei-yone into thinking that I am going to and Talented, and the department began assisting schools in acquiring and using computers. system. He is a very able school administrator, Fair said about his ees, city leaders, reporters and a few old friends, Roberts joked easily about himself. , _____ _____________,xxx I want to establish my intel- more kids would go to college if mittee Hillary' Rodhani'^Clinton lectual capabilities first, Roberts they knew a reason for it. More led that devised education stan- told the group. I graduated third kids wouldnt drop out mentally dards for the state. Also during his in my class in McNeil, Arkansas. when they are in middle school if. directorship, the states ftinding He paused, Of course there were they knew why they were there. -----' ' * only six people in the class. Thats what C-Cubed was about. , former colleague and golfing bud- Roberts in Arkansas is closely dy. They could not have chosen linked to education initiatives of come into Little Rock and do all of Clinton as governor. Roberts was this, he said. But, I do believe an ex ofilcio member ofthe com- formula was declared unconstituanyone better than Dr. Roberts. But turning around the Fort Worth system may be Roberts greatest achievement so far. If there was any criticism of him in Texas it was for not making changes quickly enough to satisfy some people and for a reluctance to conthont controversy. There are those who believe you can only have growth if you have controversy and chaos, he told the Star-Telegram. I simply do not believe that. tional and revamped. Lawmakers Colleagues say The Fort Worth C-Cubed pro- approved a penny sales-tax in- wrought miracles for the Fort ject is heralded as the forerunner crease that resulted in improved Worth district. of the School-to-Work movement teacher salaries. The districts finances were in now sweeping . the nations . Roberts was on board when the disa^ay, and jts^ cash reserves schools, Ross said. ,/. /state's controversial teacher test- r:?-'\n.L_.. Lw- In 1994, Fort .Worth won the \u0026gt; ing law was enacted in 1983. Became superintendent. During his Scholastic/National Alliance for spite his own opposition to mak- Roberts nearly depleted when Roberts be-MONDAY, JULY 22 1996 Convripht O I htia \u0026amp;. Welcome, Don Roberts Little Rock has been waiting for you w HO SENT Little Rock this new. interim superintendent of schools, the search com- mittee or Heaven? Don Roberts sounds custom-ordered. You got your .Arkansas rootsMcNeil in Columbia County. You got your Little Rock connectionsDr. Roberts was an assistant superintendent of the school district back in the '70s before becoming director of the state Department of Education in the administrations of both Bill Clinton and Frank White. Yes. you got your cool, even, bipartisan temperament. When he re- Tliank you. Mr. Walker. Welcome. Dr. Roberts! Peace, ain't it grand? Little Rock could use a breather from the positively Dickensian case that has held the school district and its families in thrall for what seems as long as Jamdyce v. Jamdyce. Can it be I possible? Can people treat one an- i other as people instead of plaintiff j and defendant? To quote Rett Tucker This means that the (school) board. Dr. Roberts. ' and the employees in the district for the first time in almost 40 years can i tired as school su- concentrate fully on educating our children....' That perintendent in Fort Worth, where he ran a district with 72.000 students and 9.000 teachers, the president of the teachers there said union she didn't believe Dr. Roberts had made a single enemy. .And thats the opinion of the president of the would be nice. It would be glorious. .Actually, there's a lot of education going on in the Little Rock district but for too long its been obscured by lawyering and badmouthing and all that race business and general ideological irrelevance. Itll be good teachers union! Those negotiating sessions must have been remarkable. To quote Rett Tucker, co-chairman of the citizens committee that recommended Don Roberts\nWe sought him out for this position. He has always been dedicated to high-quality desegregated education and seeks to build cooperation across racial lines. He is known as a person who keeps his word and works in good faith. He is... a healer. Dr. Roberts was healing the school districts most obvious woundthe legal kindeven before a unanimous school board voted to hire him. It seems thaL in the course of his interviews, he e.xpressed reservations about accepting the job so long as the district was tied in Gordian knots by litigation and ill will in general. And so John (The Litigator) Walker offered to hold off any new lawsuits over the settlement of Little Rocks endless school desegregation suit. John Walker had been filing such pleas for years. Now hes declaring a welcome truce. Wow. to get the spotlight back on whats important teachers teaching and kids learning. John Walker knows Don Roberts, and thats enough to let him give the man a chance\nDr. Roberts was here during the hard days. He demonstrated he was committed to the principles of desegregation. He showed it by e.xample and personal witness. I do not know of a single thing he ever did or said that would be racially divisive. I think someone like him has to have a chance. Everybody in Little Rocks school district, especially the kids, deserves a chance. Don Roberts may be just the man to give it to us. Welcome home, Don Roberts. We have missed you. And its clear we need you. Just your arriving has lifted the whole tone of how we speak to one another. Itll take some getting used to, but all of us look forward to being nice to one another again. Its about time the kids had that kind of i example set by the alleged grown-ups. |I Arkansas Democrat^^azcltc THURSDAY JI II Y 9R . iQQR \"\" 1 --------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------ Walker qualifies no litigation vow: Board must back new school chief I I BY JULIAN E. BARNES Democrat-Gazette Staff Writer HENRY WILLIAMS signs 35-month The attorney for black chil- contract to become superintendent of dren in the Little Rock school desegregation case said Wednesday his moratorium on new litigation against the school district hinges on board support for the new interim superintendent. Civil rights attorney John Walkers six-page letter Wednes- Kansas City, Mo., scboois. Page 9A. ate a climate of \"good will and sues with the federal court. Immediately after Little Rock school board members appointed Roberts on July 18 to the interim post for one to two years. Walker announced his plan to temporari- racial cooperation. which he ly halt new legal action. That prosaid will be needed after the dis- nouncement prompted a standing trict gets out of court. ovation from an audience of 100 The letter is addressed to two business people, government offi- members of a black community cials. activist parents and school group formed to analyze Little employees. ! Rock'S school desegregation plan. Roberts, retired superintendent lines ongoing litigation that he although copies were sent to 19 of the Fort Worth. Texas. School ' plans to pursue and tells school black communitv leaders inboard members that they risk le- ' ' ' day to critics of his stance places limits on the moratorium, out- Roberts. retired superintendent gal action if they do not follow the wishes of Don Roberts, named interim superintendent a week ago. The letter concludes by emphasizing Walker's desire to cre- DistricL was a Little Rock assistant I volved with the schools. Walker superintendent in e 1970s and i was responding to questions that Hafeeza Majeed and Mark Cole. served under Govs. Bill Clinton and Frank White as director of the members of a fact-finding com- state Department of Education, mittee. raised about Walker's pledge not to raise new legal is- Walker said Wednesday that See Lti ILK, Page 9A Letter Continued from Page 1A he has come to trust Roberts over a period of manj years. Although he was initially skeptical of board. Roberts' ap- ! and a request for about 5600.000 in legal fees from the Little Rock district. Walker said the moratorium does not apply to his concerns about student discipline, either. But he will give Roberts an opportunity to address his complaints before he files a motion in federal court, he said. School board member Judy Magness said she wasnt surprised by Walkers stance. \"He already has enough litiga- - . ------ tion hes filed in the last two trusted. week, months to keep him busv for two In his letter. Walker makes it vears or more, Magness said. clear that if the school board Rett Tucker, co-chairman of seeks to change the spirit of the pledge bodes well for the district, the committee that recommended desegregation plan, he will go ....................... ' ~\nback to court. pointment was j suggested by a j citizens committee charged .... . with finding a Roberts. Walker said, the man replacement for i ' championed black childrens in- Superintendent , terests when it was unpopular to Henry Williams S, ' do so. when it became John Walker I learned ... that he was a dif- i ferent kind of white man. Walker I said. \"He wanted to do the right clear last spring that he was seeking another job. Williams was selected to ! thing, and his words could be become the new superintendent in Kansas City, Mo., last week. School board President Linda Ponde.xter said that Walkers said. Walker alluded to as much ir. his letter. He emphasized that while he remains a passionate advocate for black children, people must understand that giving biac.k children's needs more consideration does not mean that white children suffer. \"The new objective that I have in mind at this time is to ensure that the goals of the settlement agreement are implemented within a framework of good will and racial cooperation which will extend beyond any final court judgment in the case.\" Walker said. ' -Majeed. to whom Walkers let- - J r, J -----------------------------------ter was addressed, was pointed in Both the letter and Pondexter Roberts, said the retired Fort her criticism of Walker. She insin- said Walker had offered Williams Worth superintendent did not . _____ a similar moratorium on litiga- . .. lates solely to Dr. Roberts and not tion. The no litigation promise re- to the school board, Walker wrote, If the board takes any ac- Pondexter said she believes want to come to the district in a litigious environment. Walker, who wanted Roberts to that Roberts will keep the \"lines take the Little Rock post offered of communication open and en- ' tion which is contrary to the de- the moratorium on his ownwhich I segregation plan and to Dr. came as a surprise to Tucker Robertsjudgments, thismorato- As he has come to know Walk- num does not apply. \"er in the last year. Tucker said, he Walker said school boards that opportunity to move forward for has been impressed by the advo- emerged after the 1989 desegrega- the schoolchildren. Ponde.xter ---- tion plan, and the superinten- said. .And John Walker is going sure that the latest moratorium lasts. The district is being given the cate. dents they appointed, have sought to be an integral part of that. to undermine the desegregation Walker said his moratorium \"If you listen and show respect bers. she said, he can be very reasonable,\" Tuck- uated that he had sold out -lo white elites, and she said she feared the black childrens interests would be compromised by a ban on new legal action, \"I don't understand how an attorney who has been so-called fighting for those causes .,. can back away from that unless there has been some sort of agreement made with school board memplan. Walker said Roberts will does not apply to three matters work to implement the plan, now before U.S. District Judge Walker said he wants to make Susan Webber Wright com- er said. Cole, the other person Walkers letter was addressed to, said sure the school board backs up the new superintendent. plaints about the double-funded incentive schools, a motion to on I trust Dr. Roberts. Walker force the Office of Desegregation said. I want to trust the school Monitorings recommendations. _ Tucker also said he thought he had questions about whether Walkers call for a moratorium re- the moratorium would prevent el- fiected cooperation throughout ements of the desegregation plan the community to try to solve the from being implemented or districts problems. changed. Cole would not offer ex- \"1 think Mr. Walker is ready for amples of problems he thought a new day in the district Tucker should be addressed.Arkansas Demcxrrar (gazette J VVEDNESDAY, JULY 31. 1996 New school chief to draw $115,000 in yearly salary 'BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazette Education Writer Dr. Don Roberts, hired July 18 as interim superintendent by the i Little Rock School Board, signed a contract Monday entitling him to an annual base salary of $115,000, a $15,000 retirement investment and $11,639 in fringe benefits. Roberts, 61, the retired superintendent of the Fort Worth, Texas, public schools, said earlier this month that he would take the Little Rock job for a minimum of one year and possibly longer. The language in his new contract permits that flexibility. - The term of the contract is about one year, starting Aug. 15 and ending Aug. 31, ISffJ. After thaL the contract will be in force on a month-to-month basis imtil Roberts or the board ends it with 60 days notice. Roberts succeeds Dr. Henry P. Williams, who will take over as superintendent of the Kansas City, Mo., public school district 'Thursday. As Little Rock superintendenL Roberts will take a cut in his base pay. Before retiring in 1994 from the Fort Worth districL Roberts salary was $122,000. Fort Worth had more than 70,000 students and a budget of about $300 million. In Little Rock, a district of about 25,000 students, Roberts base salary is the same as that paid to Williams in each of the past three years. However\n' Roberts contract allows him to decline certain fringe benefits in favor of cash reimbursements that would be added to his monthly pay. Also, Roberts will be entitled to $15,000 to fund a retirement investment of his choice. If he remains in the district beyond Au-vs-. gaging in any act that brings the disgust 1997, the district will fund the trict into disrepute, including habitretirement account at the rate of ual use of drugs or alcohol., - $1450 a month. Williams was enti- . Roberts, a native of Columbia -------- County, worked as a deputy and tied to a $10,000 yearly payment. Contracts for previous superintendents in Little Rock provided the administrators with district- leased cars for business and personal use. Roberts contract enti- ties him to a $50(}-a-month automo- of Education. bile allowance and $60 a month payment for his cellular telephone expenses. He also will get $200 a month for incidental e.xpenses as well as reimbursements for business trips and other expenses as allowed by district policy. He will get 20 days of vacation and 24 days of sick leave. He will not be entitled to any compensation for accrued vacation time or sick leave unused when his contract ends. During his first six months on the job, Roberts will get up to $5,000 to move his belongings to Little Rock He also will be eligible for monthly payments of up to $1,500 to cover costs associated with relocating. Those may include the cost of maintaining two residences, travel, house-hunting expenses and lease deposits. Roberts contract is five pages long, compared to nine pages for Williams agreement with the district As an interim superintendent Roberts has a contract with none of the trust fund and bonus provisions included in Williams contract Had Williams worked in Little Rock five years, he would have gotten the proceeds flx)m a $60,000 trust fund. His contract also included provisions for bonuses to be paid for accomplishing goals. That provision was never fulfilled. Williams contract with the district also included provisions dealing with professional training, consulting, evaluation of job per- formance. and organizational membership fees. - Roberts contract includes a provision giving the board the authority to fire the superintendent for en- assistant superintendent in the Little Rock district 22 years ago. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, he directed die general education division of the state Department_Ajkansas Democrat W (gazelle J THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 1996 Superintendent ready to start ' work on improving LR schools BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazette Education Writer The Little Rock School Districts new superintendent urged city, business and education leaders Thursday to spend the year working together to improve education, which will in turn cause the city to prosper. At a reception held in his honor, Dr. Don Roberts said he was eager to work. I want to help you improve the educational opportunity and system for kids, he told about 150 people in the lobby of the Aerospace Education Center. Take advantage of me,\" he said. I have done some good things. Im not perfect: I cant walk on water. But I can help you. Take advantage of that. Don't have me sit there and take care of the stuff that goes on from moment to moment. Let me help you come up with something that all of us can support. Roberts, 61, became interim superintendent Aug. 15. He was recruited by a biracial citizens committee and agreed to stay on the job at least a year. Roberts was an assistant superintendent in the district more than 20 years ago and is a former director of the Arkansas Department of Education. Most recently, he was superintendent for almost eight years in Fort Worth, Texas, before retiring in 1994. I am pleased to have this challenge, and, if I have the opportunity to do the job without being overwhelmed by activity and minutiae, 1 believe I can do something to help you,\" Roberts said. And, by doing that. Ill be helping myself because I really want to see Little Rock progress and become the city it can be. This city has tremendous potential, but it liasn't reached where it needs to be,\" he said. As I said to you before, you can't have a wonderful city with a soriy school system. We dont have a sorry one. but we got one that is not near what it could be,\" he said as the crowd applauded. Roberts said a unified effort to improve education is particularly important with the approach of the 40th anniversary of the integration of Central High School by nine black students. He said he hopes city leaders will be able to show the results of a year's efforts to reporters who visit Little Rock and Central High next year. The reception for Roberts and his wife, Jan. was sponsored by the Greater Little Rock Chamber of Commerce and the Little Rock Alliance for Our Public Schools.2B WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 2, 1996 Aikansas Democrat (gazette Students need computer training, LR school superintendent says BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazette Education Writer The Little Rock School Districts superintendent revealed some initial concerns about the district and shared a few of his educational beliefs at a sparsely attended public meeting Tuesday night at J_A Fair High School. Dr. Don Roberts told about two dozen parents, students and staff members that he had visited 31 of the districts 50 schools including six Tuesday since becoming interim superintendent in mid-August.. One of our significant needs is technology. he said. We are not anywhere close to up-to-date. Roberts admitted that he gets frustrated trying to operate his own personal computer, but he said students must have access to the types of computers used in business and industry. \"Its not right to allow students to leave school without showing them current technology. Roberts said, adding that hell be working with the staff and the school board to develop strategies to acquire equipment He also said students in their early teens must be exposed to varied careers so they will understand the importance of their schoolwork and can select courses appropriate for their interests. A career-education program for seventh-graders that Roberts orchestrated as superintendent in Fort Worth. Texas, won national recognition. It is being emulated in other districts, including North Little Rock and Pine Bluff. Roberts described himself as an advocate of converting junior highs into more nurturing middleschool programs. Every place I have been, if they didnt have middle schools when I got there, they did when I left, he said, though he added that he wouldnt recommend an immediate change for Little Rock partly because of the complexity of the districts school assignment plan. In middle schools, the student body is divided into groups and a team of teachers is assipied to each group. Scheduling is more flexible, and more multidisciplinary lessons are offered in middle schools than in junior highs. Generally, middle schools serve sixth, seventh and eighth grades, so sixth-graders would leave elementary schools and ninth-graders would be moved to high schools. Proposed changes in the grade configuration have proven controversial in the past. Roberts also said he believes athletics and the arts are essential programs. He said he didnt particularly agree with Texas no-pass, no-play rule for student participation in e.xtracurricular activities. Roberts is seeing the good and the not-so-great in his visits to the schools. Im seeing some good environments, he told the group. But he also recalled seeing a lot of inactivity at the end of class periods. and he recounted an exchange he had earlier in the day with a student he found sleeping in class. Youngsters hanging around a local mall and smoking at 3 p.m. on a school night also caught his attention. \"They didn't have any business being there, he said. Somebodys mother or father or grandmother or ^andfather was not paying attention. Roberts will hold two more public meetings this month. The next one is set for 6 p.m. Thursday at Franklin Incentive Elementary School.I Arkansas Democrat W! (\u0026lt;3azelle WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 9, 1996 LR official seeks relief for schools Desegregation plan said to be time stealer BY LINDA FRIEDLIEB Democtat-GazetlG Stall Wrilor The Little Rock School District superintendent called Tuesday for the relaxation of the districts desegregation i)lan. Dr. Don Roberts, speaking to a handful of parents at a town hall meeting, called the court-mandated program an activity plan that use.s up stalT time. We have to have some relief from the desegregation pian, either letting us not have to do some things for awhile while we modify the plan or else changing the plan so it's an educational |)lan, not an activity plan,\" he said. Robeils said the requirements the pian imposes on administrative stair nicnibers prevent them from doing other things with their time. He said the plan's requirements could prevent the implementation of a strategic program that parents. community members and educa- i tors developed last year. Nearly 300 volunteers took five months to write the plan, also called A Vision for the Future, to guide district olficials development of school programs and policies over the next five years. It contained recommendations to ! improve student achievement, increase enrollment and strengthen I district finances. I dont want it (the strategic plan) to wither and die,\" Roberts said. But it may have to if we can't get relief. He said he would like to replace the desegregation program with education-based goals and a tiiiietable for getting the district out of court by accomplishing those goals. Then we need to get together a's a community and decide what needs to be done, he said. For example, he said, one part of,the plan requires field trips for students. I'd much rather have a regulation that says all the kids at Mitchell (fneentive Elementary School) will learn to read, Roberts said. Robeils said he also planned to promote extracurricular activities. He said he met with the citys religious leaders to encourage them to help generate programs for children. .-Young people are going to be involved in something, going to join something, he said. Thats lyhy so many are joining gangs.\nHe said he felt programs such ' as athletics, music and art are important to students education.\nIts not where you get involved, necessarily, he said. Its that you get involved.Arkansas Democrat ' . FRIDAY. With dist r-fli c t d1y ing Roberts Continued from Page 1A on vine, chief hcipes new ideas bear fruit BYCYNTHIzX HOWELL ARK.\\.vs.As oExsxux f (.,v.r.n In his first 100 days on the job, Little Rock Superintendent Don Roberts kept many of his thoughts to himself as he became reacquainted with a school district that he left 22 years earlier. This week, Roberts revealed his views on the state of the Little Rock disirict in a televised 45- minute address to the school board and in other conversations. He said the district is dying on the vine. It is a school district so focused on the details of a complex 1989 desegregation plan that employees can't concentrate on leaching children, Roberts said. Dwindling while enrollment, old schools in disrepair, and a lack of up-to-date technology systems also are among problems Roberts cited. The problems aren't hopeless, Roberts said, but the district must change its way of doing busine.ss. He proposes asking a federal\njudge for a break of up to nine Don Roberts Monitoring Io shill temporarily from moiiiloriiig to advi.siiig Ihe disirict in budgeting, sludenl as-signmenl, sluir development and sludenl discipline. A revised plan should focus on eight lo 1(1 points Unit are Ihe most ini])ortai)t, he said. I'm not telling you what we ought lo do al this moniciil,'' Roberts said aboul Ihe operation of the district. Im telling you we ought to slop doing it the way we are doing it During a break, people could form coalitions and everybody would work together to modify the plan. \"If the judge allows us lo lake a break from the plan, its our obligation lo come out of it wilh a new game plan that ________ _ couliiicl .sclllemenl, avcrliiig a sirike by teacher.s. Since Ihcn. he ha.s worked lo unite a school board thal has been publicly split 4 3 on key issues. Lalely. he has been working with the privalc coiiipanies thal provide transportation and custodial management for the district lo improve their services. One of Roberts chief concerns i.s school buildings. The dislricl need.s new ones, and il needs a bond issue lo pay for repairs lo existing schools, he said. Il cant be good advertising for us to have il said in the Wall SliTvl .Itninml thal we have a school that needs .$6 million in re-pairs,* Roberts said, referring lo a recent article about Central High. When do we fix il? When il costs $12 million? We have lo \"I lur (Ilie want a titialily, de-segregated school district.\" Roberts said. Thi.s society is pluralistic. Our young people must learn lo work an\u0026lt;l live logelher. They can't do that if they are .separate during Iheir formalive year.s.\" Roberts also wants to address Ihe district's academic program. The dislricl has some good schools, but others aren't so good and need innncdiale work, he said. Finding new and improved ways to teach inalhemalics to more sludent.s is critical, he said. A recent national study indicated that a black student who doesn't lake high school geoineliy has a 1- in-60 chance of completing college. For whiles who don't take geometiy, Ihe chance is 1 in 20. But students of either race who will have a If the jiiilge allows ns lo take a break front Ihe plan, S Otherwise^ ohHgalioii lo come out of it with a new game so plan Ihal will have a chance of success. Otherwise, much opposition - - chance of sue- Roberts we'll have take the course* have a l in-4 chance of completing college. Nalionally, only about 17 During the proposed brcal\nso fast, we wilt have no chance I of ever getting a new plan going. district officials would conceii- has Roberts also well have so iiiiieh opposition so fast, we will have no chance of ever getting a new plan going. uisuivi uiiiviuia wuuiu vuiivcu-. naS proposed Irate on improving the quality of that the disirict develop a less percent of Don Robei ts , said. black students ever set foot in geometry class- Roberts I months from requirements of court-monitored desegregation. the schools and proposing modifi- disruptive system for handling cations to the desegregation plan. misbehaving sludenLs. Il is a proRoberts also wants the stalT in the posal that John Walker, an attor-federal Ofiice of Desegregation ney for the class of black sludent.s See ROBERTS, Page 20A in the school disirict, has doubts ---------- --------------- about. Too frequently when a teacher suspends or intends to discipline a student in some way, an advocate for the child either an attorney or someone else be- comes involved, Roberts said. That takes everybodys focus ofT what should be occurring in a school and onto a negative. We have lo remove Ihat component to an outside locality, Roberts said. He has suggested Ihal a staff member from the Office of Desegregation Moniloring supeiwise the discipline case.s below Ihe level of expulsions. Student advocates could still participate in the process, but il wouldn't divert the attention of everybody in a school from other duties. Roberts said people may wonder if the proposed timeout from desegregation moniloring is the best idea he can produce. I could have come up wilh a 1,000 things, he said. Thats not the problem. This step will help us say to the community that things are going to be different. Weve got to get people to come togellier lo change the culture in our district. Roberts has made some measurable progress. Almost immediately upon assuming his job, he got the district and the Classroom Teachers Association lo reach a show our kids that we care aboul Iheni and that we dont want them to be in unacceiilable buildings.\" The district also need.s to build one or more schools in west Little Rock lo atlracl while fainilies lo the disirict and lo ensure that the district will continue to seiwe both black and white families. Student enrollment is now 67 percent black and 33 percent while, compared with 65 percent while and 35 percent black in 1974, when Roberts last worked in the district. The disirict also needs to improve alternative education programs for students who arent doing well in traditional academic programs, Roberts said. The programs should help sin-dents grow and improve themselves. he added. Plans are already in the works lo introduce 500 of the district's junior high studenU lo the world of business next summer. The students, supeiwised by teachers, will work for a week in local businesses to show the pupils why an education is important. Roberts, as superintendent in Fort Worth, implemented a similar program that became a national model. The Little Rock Alliance for Our Public Schools has committed to help fund the program next year. Roberts, who at 62 has been an educator for almost 40 years, told the Little Rock board that he is no longer interested in being a traditional superintendent. Tn the time tliat I'm here 1 don't want to just do those things that I've done for my whole lifetime and that you have seen a thousand other people do. That wouldn't be valuable use of my lime.\" he said. I don't think Vm smarter than anyone else. I'm just looking at it from a different point of view. I do believe all'those years ofexpe-rience ought lo let me see sonu things that might be of benefit ti this district and this city. T'm going to be obsessed will*, making .sure that teach the chil dren' becomes our motto. I hope we get a chance to come up with soniething together that will allow us to do that.\" Arkansas Democrat azeUe 9 TUESDAY. MARCH 25. 1997 Find new \"chiefby98, Roberts tells LR scliobls a t U'. .V BY CYNTHIA HOWELL ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE Interim Superintendent Don Roberts has asked the Little Rock School Board to find a successor by the end of this calendar year. i School Board President John ' Riggs IV confirmed Monday that he will issue a news release today announcing that the board will search for a new chief executive with the goal of having that person employed by September. Roberts, 62, said Monday he is willing to stay on the job briefly after the arrival of a new superintendent to help with transition. He also said he is willing to assist the district on future projects but does not want to be the full-time superintendent ! ' T Roberts and his wife, Jan, intend to continue living in central Arkansas, where two of his three adult children and two of his four grand- I See ROBERTS, Page 11A Roberts pontinued from Page 1A children live. Roberts became interim superintendent of the states largest district last August at a salary of $115,000. He succeeded Dr. Henry Williams, who left to become superintendent in tlie Kansas City, Mo., Scliool District. A native of McNeil in Columbia County and a former Little Rock School District employee, Roberts was recruited by a citizens committee chosen by the School Board. Tlie committee co-chairmen were Dr. Roosevelt Brown and Rett Tucker. Tucker was chairman ofthe Greater tittle Rock Chamber of Coimnerce. ' Roberis said when selected that Hd would serve at least one year and possibly two. \"Committee members heralded Rdberts as a healer. Civil rights at- tdrhey John Walker, a committee member, joined in praise of Roberts and pledged to not sue the _ district in federal court during Rbbcrts tenure. Roberts had been living in retirement in Fort Worth, where he hh'd served for more than seven years as superintendent in the district of 72,000 students and 9,000 teachers. During Roberts tenure in Fort ^prth, the district was nationally recognized for academic programs, ihcluding the Vital Link program in which sixth-graders and their t^hchers were placed in businesses and industries for a week so they could see how their lessons were applied in the workplace. Roberts worked in tlie Little Rock district in tlie late 1960s and early 1970s as an assistant and deputy su- p^erintendenL He left Little Rock to become superintendent in Newport I?ews, Va., but returned in the late 1970s to become director of the general education division of the Ajrkan- sas Department of Education under Giivs. Bill Clinton and Frank White. IJe later was superintendent of the Amarillo, Texas, schools and then the Fort Wortli district \" Shortly after taking tlie Little R'bck job last year, Robeifs urged the School Board to ask a federal judge for a hiatus of up to nine months in federal court monitoring of\nthe districts desegregation ef- fqhs. He called it a Kings X, after a gum he played as a child. Roberts spiij district employees needed the time to strengtlien the districts educational program and propose modifications to improve the 1989 qqsegregatioii plan. \n,,U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright agreed to the moratori- ' IArkansas Democrat ^(Ojizclk | \u0026gt; WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 3, 1997 Save our schools, 1997 ust M In 1957, Little Rock again has a choice. The city can stick with the same J old reflexive responses and watch its school district slip back into resegregation. Or it can think anew and act anewwhich is what leaders worthy of the name do when their communitys situation is new, Don Roberts, doing toe district a last service on his way out as school superintendent is a fair-minded, realistic veteran of the school wars. He proposes that the school district concentrate on educating kids regardless of color, and proceed to build public schools where Little Rocks school-age population is. Heres a way to bring back public education for all. But there will always be those who would rather stick to old obsessions. And toe old obsession with racial balance has left this district anything but racially balanced. Some members of toe school board un- derstMd toe challenge and are prepared to meet it Mike DaugherW, for example, cant sw the sense of continuing to bus black kids long distances to already predominantly black schools. He understands toe attraction of neighborhood schoolsfor families of any race. And hes for more nei^borhood schools as a way to keep families in their neighborhoodsand in toe public system. So is Ricky Hicks, another member of toe school board. To quote toe Reverend Mr. Hicks: I dont know how we ever got to the point where we measure educational quality by toe number of white children in a classroom. Ive never been concerned about the number of whites in my sons classroom, but I am concerned about the quality of education. So are most parents. Racial balance in the schools is desirable, but when that one goal began to take precedence over convenience, practicality, efficiency, reason in general, and finally education it^if, we lost sight of what integration was about: equal opportunity. Instead, integration has been reduced to some elaborate, expensive, and in toe end meaningless numbers game. We need to get back to thinking about what is best for each individual child, rather than in terms of racial blocs, their leaders and lawyers. Paul Greenberg Were all in this together. When youve been wandering in the wilderness for 40 years (1957-97) its only natural that leadership becomes reflexive instead of responsive. John Walker, whos been lawyering this cause just about since it was a cause, had an immediate reaction to Dr. Roberts new plan. It sounded a lot like: Hell. No! Or maybe Forget, Never!' To quote him more precisely, Mr. Walker says the new plan has no possibility of meeting our approval. Mike Daugherty is hoping John Walker will reco^ider. I think once he studies these revisions, says Mr. Daugherty, he will imderstand that this is for the better, even if he does not agree with all of it ^e Daugherty sounds like a cockeyed optimist which is just what this school district needs, but it may be too late for some of us to adjust to new realities, John Walker has been fighting the status quo of 1957 so long he may have lost touch with the realities of 1997. It would be nice to have his help in saving public education in this community, but, with or without Mr. Walker, the public schools can and will be saved. They must be if Little Rock itself is to have the kind of future all would wish for it. Sometimes old victories lead to new defeats. By sticking with old strategies, and old plans, new challenges go unmet Just look at what has happened to racial balance in school after school in the Little Rock district Look at how little has been aa A fl I' JI Ji '\u0026gt; ' 4-1 achieved at what great e.xpense. Think of how much could be achieved with some flexibility, imagination, and a newly united communityif we put ideology aside and concentrated on toe kids. A blueprint for toe future of public education in Little Rockits called Plain Talk, and it ishas been produced under the aegis of toe University of Arkansas at Little Rock. Will it be consigned to toe shelf, or take life? .4 grand opportunity to act on that report now approaches: This capital city is about to commemorate toe 40to anniversary of toe crisis at Central High. It was more than a constitutional crisis. It was a moral crisis, too. In many ways, it represented a failure of toe imagination, of toe spirit, of toe local, state and national conversation about race. - If we simply go through this months cer- emoni^ without applying toe lessons of that crisis, without reaching out to one another for new ways to undo old mistakes, those ceremonies will be only thatceremonies. Worse, our leaders can use this occasion to go through the same old motions and take toe same old, predictable positions,.- What a grand opportunity this anniver: sary would be to do something different to get together behind toe school boards new plan. What a good time this would be to convene that Community Congress mentioned in UALRs report on toe schools: an open- minded group of people, people with no axes to grind, who are broadly representative of toe people ofthe city and are connected in ways that will permit their work to flow back and inform others in toe community. Plain Talk uses as its frontispiece a quotation from Will and Ariel Durants The Lessons cf History. Their words would seem particularly relevant to Little Rock just now) When toe group or a civilization declines, it is through no mystic limitation of a corporate life, but through toe failure of its political and intellectual leaders to meet the challenges of change. ----------------- Paul Greeuierff is editorial page editor of the Ariamsas Democrat-Gaeette. He vxn the Pulitzer Prize inl969fi\u0026gt;r editorials oixna civil rights. IbUllOniALS T The continuing crisis L\u0026gt;i\u0026gt;ii liobcrts bluepniit for chaise ,J,I R DA.'.C..R... ..w. .n s Aii/'iisl .2..!.ll.l.i .in .sMvliiiouuuil wwuniiiiihui gfo\u0026lt;) ulipp IiIlIl wWecsstl LLilUllllee llie (jlisoeiiiiglilcncil yenr of Hoek, ifs (Jie lasleslgixnviiig pail of InIIinIKe'(leepn\n -h1lullnldlrrie\u0026lt;dfl a'IInI.dI ninety- II. ..II.. \u0026gt;...1 !, I . r seven. Leading the front page of IJie Uie cily. bill JI lia.sii'l had a new paper were stories, |ilclnres, and graphics re\u0026lt;-ounling Ihe daik ages- Ihe Cenlial High Crisis of l(Ki7. That was years back, when cleaily we .(lidn'l know heller. All llic ncw,s jilay .^.ven Uie aiiniveisaiy left mom at Ihe .lop of Uic page for just one oUier slo-schooi since BZ7H. Il's liard to Lliink of a boiler cx- ample of what's wrong with Liltle Rocks school dislvicl limn IJial last lad. U.S a.s if public educalion had ly: a single column article with Ihe subhead, given lip on a whole section of the cily and was reli-ealing into a shell. If Ulis school dislricl ts Io keep hum be,, 0, , I ....................c o. .m...i.n'og resefgretga*lcd -- amnmd IIlI' s.s amlmmoossti w, ..I i i , 1. Ihei-c, folks-were going to have to at- would be inodiricd. ttrraacctt wwhhiillee sslutuddeennLt-s! ttoo fdhioe opnuhbiilnic ibio li'l ............s-'l'ools. And where are so many of Illis Storys all loo current. those while sludenls? Out west \"It Some Uilngs don t change. Some would biing more whites into die dis- ,U)ing.s don I even have enough d id,\" Dr. RoberLs stus of die pre- 'J'' sL'liool. \"Wc can't recruit go.slisakes. I'oityycais ago, die debate em now\" cciilercd on Litde IliK-k's plan for in tfgiadon. hotly yeais later, die dcbnlo \nNope, its not a reprint iloiii 1957. \u0026lt;11------ -fr- vaicillKV. OIIIIIU Jnjiijs don't liiivc cimiigli com iJ'llie jilan would let more kids go /.QiiUnn .............to schools in Uieir own nelghbor- Wno^nAi TIv iimVi , AIJxevsQeVgfMievgsnii uiMono nhooooudss.. iIimnaaggminee:: AA KkiKdi ccoouulldd walk to school raUier Uiaii spending an hour J** ret^J approach lo '9 schooling. A pleasant side effect . More stable neighborhoods. This plan is a lol like what lute- ---- J i.i vciii:u Ine Revised Desegregation and Edu- 'I'hls latest Cliffs Noles-veislon of t1h,e_ _o_ld, deseg p--l-a--n. Xis\na. lo. t .b e lte* r (Jinn fgturiauloionniaisisls ubaaccKk inin utileie o6o0ss utliioouugj^liitt racially integrated education would fp low and focuses on Uie basics of be: reasonably pracUcal. Instead of education, not racial percentages, al- ... .... tendance zones, and fleoLs of buse.s. wiial it t(K\u0026gt; oflen turned out lo be\nan tanxviiso andi ric\"ki s\"h1 a*w\"s'*. Ilie jd\"!a n wa.s spends mnilnliownosik anbolte lobo ioiinledgogrngllee UUiniet schoolswhile putUng educaUoti not Robei-ls to Lillie Rocks school board rust but last Make Uiat a distant last 'ri' ,interested parlies ln.sl after an biunease check list of minute nTvL?'i I n ............... specincnUoiis Uinl would make the .It was his goodbye gift to Uie dis- smallest-minded bean counter look inct, a last chance to make sense broad-minded and generous and educationof de- .R segregation. But al least one intereslcd parly gave It Uie same old heave ho. John Walker, Who represents a group pf: children in Uie de- Pffgregatlon lawsuit, hn.s V.een uncharaelerlsll-cally recepUve Uiese last few nionUisa leinpo- This plan would move 9U)-Graders out of junior biglis and into high schools, an Idea Uial some of us former rniy concession to Dr. Roberts, a man of'unqualiried good will. But now Mr. iow-on-lhe-totem-pole OUi-Gradeis recommend highly. The Inst Uiiiig must hormone-spiked, rage-agalnsl-authorlty 9Ui-Graders need to be is role models. And most of Uie district's higli schools can acconiniodate .Walker, Esip, sny.s: As far os Im con ., lu.i.m.,..- uh. uie.v,s one 01g, oig eerned (Uic plan} has no possibilily of excepUonCenlral High. How ac-iiiee ng our approval. First of all, its coiiuiiodate a few hundred more stu-a noUinig plan. It doesnl do anyUiing. dents al a school already bursting It says black children have no rights wiUi 2.000 sludenls? Good question \u0026gt;d this ts d.mul cosi^Utuljjjiinl ihc superinlcndenl admils. But where rights lor black childioii.\" Uiere's a will .... . a. '.u.v,, IIU IglllO and tins case Ls about coirsUtutioiial a !llli Grade claw, llicies one big, big '5'Pe pages of i..c.co lu mis piun. nui noi Uie Revised Desegregation and Ed- much. It's only 16 pages long. And Uie ucatioii 1 Ian, we .seem lo have supcrinlcndcnt can sum it up in Iwo oussed die section that .strips black words: Education Fii-st, Now Uint anybody else of Uieir would be a nice legacy lo leave Uie noble Till! l/iliii UZt.ll,..,. i iii . There's more to this plan. But not ' 11 T 1 I ... .. xviiiii MW \u0026lt; iiitu ivgiH-y lu leiive uie Ml i'J ^'slricts incoiiiing superintendenL will Into anything, and. in Uiis case, Ix-slie Caniine. And it wouldnt hurt 1 he's done il ag.ain. Conclusion: If people of good will have to save public education hi this town wllhoul him, Uien we'll have to do il wllhoul him. Uic kids, eilJicr. I Obiy. Now let's get on willi it '\\Vli:il R niiM iriipfessTvi'^nioiir iir. llolieiLs plan i,s Itijil il ran Im\nlead in one silling. Amazing. Compare il lo the 2iiich pile ufjaigon known a.s llu' I T WAS WIIDLLY a plcasuh' (o vis-il with Don Roberts again. lie dropped by before his nieefing Thursday nighl and (irovcd just as Ai kansa.K hoiH'.sl as he w:i.s nine 1 lie monliis ago back when he came up V'c\n'' os ii wwiitihii mthe Iiddeeaa oolf a lIir uiiccee bellwoeen IIhe Df .y.gK.galion 1 ian\nmd iLs equally districts warring liidions. A King's X 3 0^0*'^'\"\n*': he -alled il. Out ol llial peaceliil lime Tool Kit. No piiy.sic.s lexibooks ever lookiti KO inlimidafing. The original plan is big ami complicaled enough lo Ialled i(. Ont ol'ihal peaeel'iil iiinl Ilie wink ol d\u0026lt;izeii.s olroneei'iii'd I'ilizeii.s lamc IIk' Revisml Desegre galion and lxhn'alion I'lnn, Ihil unieK.s we ael oil il, 40 yeais hum now it m: i hc.illh taie leform bill. And aboiil be only bmely recnllcti as the Insl IaIKs tu ls.llepffull]l, Dllro,n,i llR,.oIbe .1i'4ls was a.1b.1le.. II.o. .g..o. ..I__ J I ..... Ihrongh Ihe revised plan section by seclion Ihe oilier da.v in less Ilian an hour. And if you've ever bilked with/lieen hilled by Dr. Robeils. you kmiw he'll never be aci iised of rirsli chance lo keep l.illh- RoeVs school disliii'l horn becoming almosl as seg regaled a.s il wa.s in Ti7. The sohilion, just a,s in .57, is up lo n,s. We can take Ibis plan serionsiv, all ,, ,1...................................................o...f. ..n..s.,. ..o...r. mgivvee up.. vWvee can lfoorrmm tlhimall .1 M M o A Hr Commuiuly t4tugiT.s.s recommended aail lMllecNNmei l, AAlr-klr. , csrpiie.,eitiill, (wl,iliici..hl. ...... I...........11__ . .. . . . nolcli behnv slow. i.s one To simimarize: The pian emphasize.s reading and malhemalics, including algebra. Don Robeils would like to see a I'ily Wille campaign to gel kids Io read. II would be similar to Uio statewide campaign under way now in 'Ibxas. \"I in anolher report and pul educalion lirst - before Ihe race issue, before our own precious egos, b,=fv.v lawyers fees and all the salisfactions before waul lo create an alnio.spliere.\" he .sjijs, \"where you leel had if you're iml of cheap dcmagogueiy ... or we can Walch Ilie laigcsl school ilislricl in Ilie slate go .lim Crow again. This lime maybe for good. Ami what hajipeii-s Io school dis- Irirl.K lia.K a way of Imppctiing (o Ihi* I ........ ^c.iiltiicc..-s. lIuhceyj sseeinveo.. iI,z\u0026lt;nn,iKk aarroouiinndii natl leu\u0026lt;0 ig- (.oiinl ns in anil pass liny America's inner cilies. Tliis discussion RHerieridil'cs EhtnnniilMHwip. ..... ... . .... _. ... The plan calls Ibr building Iwo new elcinenfaiy schools. Due wouhl go up al Ihe site of the former bil l just about Illi' l,ii(Je Kock School Disliicl. Il's aboiil Lillie IliKk We can save our schools, or we can jusl for s,\n........ - jgiveil nil.. W\u0026gt;e\nIc.aIlnl .sMauvee our ciily, or ndrritflti. Slephen.s ^hool near downtown. Once We can squabble, or we can work Io-that school IS budt, Ihe district would gelher. The basic decisions in life cluse down Garland Elemenlar,v jii.sl don'l change all Lhal much: Wlielher a few blocks away. Ilie other new il's ISKTZ or KHZ?, Rs slill decision time. Aikansas iX-inocral B^lnHislirHl inza Avltnnnan 7?r(f\u0026gt;azcllc RsinliliRboil 1819 Arf\u0026lt;an,sa,s Deniociat /^(l,*)jizell\u0026lt;.' Aihans-'if\n' Npwr.f\u0026gt;ni)ei Walter E. Hussmnn, Jr.. Publisher Grinia Smith, |r. F.tpculhx FOHoi Pnul Gificnborg f.Mo'ial Pego FMiv on WUUNESOAY, SEPl EMBER 3. 1997 Poul n. Smith VP/GiuvalMunngitr Lynn tlnmlllon VP. Oi'r/fllioiij John Mobbs Larry Graham Cicul.il:cn Dtifeloi Ealol Jellery, Jr. ot PlOfOOtIQ/'t Cnpylglll C mriMto Rock NnwatMlpAil. Inc Arkansas Democrat '^(ij^azctte ] WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 29, 1^7 Schools awaiting ruling -'Little Rock owes a debt of gratitude to Dr. Don Roberts, who returned to the Little Rock School District more than a year ago. -Roberts, a nationally known educator, had retired after mitigating the Fort Worth School Districts problems. Hanng previously been an assistant superintendent of the LRSD, he was well aware of our problems, but was willing to return and help in a time of crisis. With the help of relaxed requirements from Judge Susan Webber Wright and the hard work of a dedicated school board, the district has had a good year. .As Wright recently reported, virtually no reports of school violence, labor strife or infighting among school board members and the superintendent Where do we go from here? We are rapidly approaching the point where professional educators, dedicated school board members and parents will give up and simply write off the district as a lost cause. Wright has before her a revised school district desegregation and education plan prepared by an outstanding superintendent who knows the problem and has come out of retirement to work and study this problem. The hope of the Little Rock School District will rest with her decision. Is the primary goal of our district to be education or continued litigation? H. PRICE ROARK Little RockArkansas Democrat ^(gazette FRIDAY, JANUARY 23, 199ff^. 5E Fof rhef intcrirn school chief to stny on with district as consultant fet^llS^S15.SS?cS- Sof Edu?ahom''''Sete^re^otiltions'T''\"\" '\"a rt^^P^^vision of the school money for educating children who Mo'o!^ToSvcS^TiS' iofyei ' mSKKSSss\nfor the district as a consultant Tie distocts new superinten- Mauuaie ! dent Les Carnine, said Thursday dent for desegregation that Roberts will work through \" ' March as a consultant to him and to the board on matters related to supervision Of the school pleted negotiations on a revised distnct by the end of the 2000-2001 - plan with civil rights attorney John school year. , Walker. In other business, the School fSSf5 =S SBStoS BBSS ...I..... g.jSTss.-'sa\nCoiSwSpecFa!^ch?o! '5^e Little Rock board also Last week Roberts and attor- Schools vokeSp^ortfoftt^ ?^finl^^X \"1' J th. d^ SSKSKa^LTd,rx^^ S5TdX^Jd'3,t^S\" position of associate superinten- Roberts was an assistant superintendent in the Little Rock dis- trict in the 1960s and later became , J------ST.\"-----------: The proposed plan is now CIVIC leaders asked him to serve as awaiting federal court approval siinonntQTiaor,* lone II . Thursdays regular monthly school board meeting, representa- superintendent in 1996. He accept-\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_678","title":"Little Rock Schools: McClellan Community High","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1995/2002"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","McClellan Magnet High School (Little Rock, Ark.)","School management and organization","School improvement programs","Student assistance programs","School facilities"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock Schools: McClellan Community High"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/678"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nOld Glory' MAY 19 1995 Ms. Ann Brown \u0026amp; Staff Office of Desgregation 201 E. Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Bldg. Little Rock, AR 72201 Office of Desegregation Monitoring 1' You are cordially invited to attend the Open^iouse. and (Dedications^ oftfic .'?V ' T\\\u0026gt;' f ! I 5 \u0026gt;* TV 1 i 1I C[inic T uesday May 30,1995 4:00 - 6:00 p.m. McClellan Health Clinic 9417 Geyer Springs Road t. 111 h, 5 R.S.V.P. 570-4149 by May 25 ieL Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 March 6, 1995 Mr. William Fields, President McClellan Community School Advisory Council 9910 Ramona Little Rock, AR 72209 Dear Mr. Fields: As I'm sure you are aware, the desegregation plans and court orders place a great deal of importance on the Community School Program as a means for desegregating McClellan High School. The school district is obligated to involve the McClellan Community High School Advisory Council in making decisions about the program's operations and funding. Court Orders issued on December 30, 1992 and August 26, 1993 have been particularly explicit about the role of the Advisory Council, including budget planning and adjustment. I am very interested in determining how the Advisory Council has been operating, and especially the extent to which the Council has been involved in decisions that affect the school. I will appreciate your forwarding to me the following information immediately: 1, 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Copies of the Council minutes up to the present time, begiiming with the 1993-94 school year. A list of current Council membership by race, gender, and affiliation (such as school employee, business person, retiree, etc.), and the date each member joined the Council. A list of current officers and date of election. Bylaws and the date they were ratified by the Council. Council guidelines for selecting new members. Council guidelines for electing officers. A list of standing committees and a brief summary of their responsibilities. The job description of the program coordinator. Any other information that would be helpful in assessing the make-up and activities of the Council.March 6, 1995 Page Two Also, you may be aware that a business case, which would significantly change the McClellan Community School Program, was recently presented to the Little Rock School District Board of Directors. Please write a short description telling me how the advisory council was involved in developing this or any other business case that proposes to change the community program or its funding. Thank you very much for your assistance. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely yours, A Ann S. Brown cc\nJodie Carter/:a RECE!VEC Office of Desegregasion Moniic MAR 8 1995 ig Community Education A beacon of hope for our children's future... \\ Presented by: .V The McClellan Community Education Advisory Council \\ February 23, 1995 Community Education: A Smart Investment for the Little Rock School District Introduction J. Southwest Little Rock residents dont have to look too far to see the effects of drugs, crime and gang activity, but they also dont have to look too far to see a beacon of hope...right in their own backyard. Some would say the era of neighborhood schools is long gone...but try telling that to the community who benefits daily from the programs and activities provided by Community Education. It is difficult during times of critical financial cutbacks, for the Little Rock School District not to seek cuts from its many programs. But it is also critical to take note of the programs that do work and are effective, and to take responsibility for exploring feasible financial strategies to keep them alive. One must also keep in mind the long-range outcome of these decisions, and the immediate effects they can have on the community. The City of Little Rock, the U.S. Department of Education, area businesses, churches, and community organizations have demonstrated their support for Community Education in the form of dollars and resources. These contributions directly impact not only Little Rock School District students, but the community in which they live. The following approved business case is being submitted by the Community Educations Advisory Council Executive Committee, noting that the business case submitted by the McClellan Community School Principal was factually erroneous, did not involve Communitv Education staff or Advisory Council members in its development, and was submitted without the staff or Councils knowledge or approval. The following business case is being submitted as/amStcat^i?pfen1or^the^^ Education program, and the following recommendations are hereby set forth by the Community Education Advisory Councils Executive Committee to be considered by the Little Rock School District Board, Administration, and Beacon School Steering Committee: 1. lo merge Community Education programs and services wwiitthh the BBeeaaccoonn SScchhnonoll program at Cloverdale Junior High\n2. To merge Community Educations inventory and other community resources with the Beacon School program at Cloverdale Junior High\nand 3. To modify Community Educations personnel and operating budget to reflect a % cut of its 1994-95 budget paid by the Little Rock School District It is the position of the Community Education Advisory Council that these three dations will ensure the continuation of Community Education programs and services. This modification plan will provide the Little Rock School District with $80,000 in budget cuts through a collaborative effort with the City of Little Rock and other community partners. The plan will also provide a well-trained, highly qualified and motivated program staff to recommen-cuts work in a collaborative effort with the Beacon School Program, including over $100,000 in inventory and community resources. Its truly a win-win proposition! Community Education: A Smart Investment for the Little Rock School District The Proposed Solution The following proposal will outline a strategy for each recommendation that will maintain Community Educations current programs, services, and obligations to the Southwest Little Rock community, as well as afford the Little Rock School District with much needed budgetary cuts. Recommendation #1 To merge Community Education programs and services with the Beacon School program at Cloverdale Jimior High School. Overview of Current Programs and Services Community Education is a community-based program that provides a wide variety of programs, services, and recreational activities to Central Arkansas residents, in particular residents of Southwest Little Rock, by utilizing an existing school facility to serve the community after school, evenings, and weekends. Community Education is a concept that provides opportunities for all local community bers, schools, and organizations to become partners in addressing educational and community concerns. The Community School is open year-round with educational opportunities' available to all residents of Central Arkansas. The Community School, in collaboration with other community agencies, provides academic, extracurricular, sports, health, social services, college and work force preparation programs for citizens of all ages, particularly Little Rock School District youth. mem- The goals of the Community School are: to provide programs and services that meet the needs of the community it serves\nto utilize existing school facilities, after school hours, for the provision of programs and services\nand to offer a variety of classes focusing on educational and personal enrichment, prevention, health, recreation, vocational, and job skill development through the reallocation of existing community resources. The Community School currently provides the following programsJ^sCTvices 3^_______ to the Little Rock School District, the City of Little Rock, and the surrounding community. resources reflecting many of the goals of the Beacon School Program! operates after school, evening, summer, and weekend hours\norganizes positive recreational and socialization opportunities for children and youth\nprovides after school tutoring and homework help program for all ages\noffers summer day camp for children ages 6-12\nCommunity Education: A Smart Investment for the Little Rock School District provides summer jobs for youth\norganizes various community projects such as^nfey and June Bug Days\ncoordinates ACT Lock Ins and Care packai K packages for college students (encouraeine students to stay in school)\nprovides a wide range of health and wellness services\noffers GED, literacy programs, and other educational opportunities for older youth and adults\nand encourages positive community involvement and family participation. The Southwest Little Rock Healthy Family Center a.- -The Healthy Family Center program model is designed to develop, implement, and support a comprehensive, community-wide education, prevention and intervention program for children, youth and families in the Southwest Little Rock area, one of the most troubled neighborhoods in the Little Rock School District. The Center will provide direct prevention/ intervention services to participants aimed to reduce factors that contribute to drug and , alcohol use, abuse, and addiction, teen pregnancy, gang involvement, and school dropouts. The programs and activities provided at the Center offer an^ternative to drugs, gangs, and violence. Through membership in the Center, youth earn ^(Qlloalr^sr\u0026lt;.//jj^^:s and other incentives for participation and performance in approved educatiioonnTTddrruugg pprr\u0026lt;evention, life skills, conflict resolution, support groups, and other self improvement classes and activities, in addition to community service work. This service model is based on integrating the existing services, talents and resources of school personnel, service agencies and organizations, churches, businesses and corporations, local and state governments, parents, neighborhood ' associations and civic groups to meet the needs of high risk youth in the Southwest Little Rock area. Community Education has received a federal grant for a two year period from the U.S. Department of Educations Drug-Free Schools and Communities Emergency Grant Initiative to implement the Healthy Family Center program, much in line with the Beacon School Program model, /Ci A comprehensive case maanaageemeentt prrogrraam iiss onee off ttlhe main components of the Healthy Family Center. Trained adult mentors serve as facilitators of peer support groups to identify needs, discuss problems, situations, and other issues that affect the daily lives of young people. The adult mentors are managed by licensed case managers who provide additional counseling services, referral to services, and follow-up care to youth participants and their families. The Community School s Healthy Family Center brings in the resources of community agencies, organizations, and service providers to meet the needs of youth and family participants. The following list represents the magnitude of resources that are currently offered through the Health Family Center, as well as the collaboration that exists between the Healthy Family Center and other SWLR service providers. 4 Community Education: A Smart Investment for the Little Rock School District The Parent Center The MELD Program (Minnesota Early Learning and Development) Program provides parenting and prenatal classes, role modeling, mentors, and support groups, health checks, drug information, meals, and other support services provided by The Parent Center, a Division of Centers for Youth and Families\nThe Step Up Center Substance abuse assessment and referral services for youth who have been identified as using/ abusing drugs and/or alcohol\nand substance abuse support groups for youth and their families are provided by The Step Up Center\nThe Little Rock School District , A Mobile Resource Unit travels throughout the Southwest Litde Rock area providing substance abuse information, WIC services, AFDC and food stamp applications, immunizations, flu shots, blood pressure checks, and other primary health services provided in a collaborative effort with the Arkansas Department of Health, the Little Rock School District, the Rice Depot, Little^Roc^ightog. Back, and the Arkansas Department of Human Services. \"Creative Solutions for Arkansas, Inc. A computerized on-line information, referral, and tracking system that will link the Healthy Family Center, the above service providers, and thirteen (13) area schools via modem to an exclusive network that will enable users to share information regarding the needs of youth participants and their families, and to establish a more responsive service delivery system for the Southwest Little Rock community. Developed and provided by Creative Solutions for Arkansas, Inc. The Healthy Family Center program is currently operating out of McClellan High School, and provides programs and services Monday - Friday from 4:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m., and Saturdays from 9:00 a.m. 1:00 p.m., and organized Saturday evening activites as well. The Healthy Family Center has a program staff of 42 individuals who schedule, develop, coordinate, and manage the programs and services provided after school hours. Program staff includes: A Healthy Family Center Coordinator A Information Management Coordinator Three (3) Case Managers Fifteen (15) Support Group Mentors (10) Peer Tutors A Creative Expression Coordinator Two (2) Security Officer^ Four (4) Healthy Family Center Youth Staff A Summer Camp Coordinator during the summer 5Community Education: A Smart Investment for the Little Rock School District Three (3) Summer Camp Curriculum Specialists One full-time Summer Health Services Specialist during the summer Community Education will receive over $500,000 for a two year period to staff and operate the Healthy Family Center. A smooth transition of the Community Educations Healthy Family Center program to the Beacon School Program could occur without endangering the guidelines of grant funds, if this recommendation obtains School Board approval. Recommendation # 2 To merge Community Educations inventory and other community resources with the Beacon School prograamm aatt CClloovveerrdale Junior High. nas that the /VvLh. The Advisory Council recommeni le entire inventory of Community Education be merged with the Beacon School Program (see attach^ inventory list) as welTas other com-munity resources that'have Been\"gene'rated by Community Education. Communi^t^ducation leveraged the following community resources and support, more than/tripplmgme Little Rock School Districts investment: Federal Grant................................ Class Tuition.................................. Corporate Donations................... City Tax Allocation......... ............ Community Festivals................... Agencies Support......................... Neighborhood Associations....... 2 Cool 4 School Summer Camp Medical Donations........................ Total............................................ $235,000 (2 years) 50,000 8,500 5,000 10,300 4,150 275 7,250 100,000 $420,475.00 Thousands of citizens have visited and participated in Community Education programs, classes, and activities. Supportive participation by community members translates into support for the Little Rock School District. Recommendation # 3 To modify Community Educations personnel and operating budget to reflect a 55% cut of its 1994-95 budget paid by the Little Rock School District, The Advisory Council is submitting the following modifications to the Community Education budget that is funded by the Liule Rock School District, The recommendation is thnrTKe Little Rock School District maintain two (2) full-time positions, two (2) part-time positions, and $ 10,000 of operating expenses for office, brochure and postage expenses. The Advisory 6 Community Education: A Smart Investment for the Little Rock School District Council requests that the following positions be funded by the modification plan: Full-Time Positions Program Director Office Manager/Bookkeeper Part-Time Positions Technical Writer Receptionist Name Brenda Scrimager Rhetta Mayfield Name Susan Williams Pam Adcock The Little Rock School District will cover the cost of a copy machine, telephone, program ( supplies, and fax service. (See attached budget for specific figures and budget totals.) Implementation Plan April 1, 1995 Community Education will be moved to the Beacon School site and a smooth transition of programs and services will occur at Cloverdale Junior High School. May 1, 1995 All Community Education inventory and other community resources will be merged with the Beacon School Program. June 1, 1995 Implement Healthy Family Center summer program and continue programs and services. Hire additional staff with city funds. August 1, 1995 Conduct 6 month review from participating community agencies and organizations and submit evaluation status report to the Little Rock School Board and the Beacon School Steering Committee. Summary This proposal is being submitted as a modification plan to the McClellan Community Education programj,,to.be-c-onsidered-in4ieu-of deletionrhy-thc-tkl ~ .to.be-c-onsidered-m4ieu-ofdeletionrby-thc-trttl\u0026lt;Ro It is the recommendation of the Advisory Coundlth\nRock School Board and Ad- mmistratioi lat Community Education and its programs, resources, and ^aff, merge with the Beacon School program at Cloverdale Junior Higf^SchooI in order to develop a unified, collaborative program that will best serve e youth and families of Southwest Little Rock and the surrounding area. It is the primary intent of the Advisory Council to ensure that Community Educations programs and services continue, that the Healthy Family Center program is a success, and that the hard-work, dedicated staff of Community Education continue their work in Southwest Little Rock. The investment of the Litde Rock School District in Community Education is minimal in comparison to the resources, support, and funds that opportunity for us all. are in turn leveraged. This is a unique 7McClellan Community Education Proposed Budget 1995 - 1996 Fiscal Year FUNDED THROUGH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Budget Line Item ADMINISTRATION: Director Office Manager/Secretary Technical Writer (Part Time) Receptionist (Part Time) Fringe Benefits Total Administration Budget Amount $44,321.04 $19,667.76 $6,760.00 $5,200.00 $8,024.10 $83,972.90 OPERATIONAL EXPENSES: Printing Supplies Total Operational Expenses $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 TOTAL PROJECTED BUDGET $93,972.90 FUNDED THROUGH CITY OF LITTLEROCK Budget Line Item ADMINISTRATION: After School Activities Coor. Youth Workers (4 part time) Evening Supervisor (part time Fringe Benefits Total Administration Budget Amount $6,240.00 $13,572.00 $8,736.00 $2,183.92 $30,731.92 OPERATIONAL EXPENSES: Print Brochure (2 times) Class Brochure Layout Total Operational Expenses $3,000.00 $400.00 $3,400.00 TOTAL PROJECTED BUDGET $34,131.92 TOTAL PROPOSED BUDGET $128,104.82t McClellan community EDUCATION ftI E i 1 hf H i M I E C I N RI I \"T S E Y /g mm C O M R U R 1995-1996 X E o McClellan Community High School Office of Community Education 9417 Geyer Springs Road Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 Phone: (501) 570-4149 XI o co in co McClellan Community Education is designed to develop a partnership between the school and community in order to provide educational opportunities and services to McClellan students, parents, other patrons, Little Rock School District employees, residents of Southwest Little Rock and neighboring communities.tCIKBBBBg LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT John L. McClellan Community High School 9417 Geyer Springs Road Phone 570-4100 Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 February 26, 1996 RECEIVED MAR 1 8 1996 Linda Pondexter, President Little Rock School Board 810 W. Markham Street Little Rock, AR. 72201 Office of Desegregation Mcmionng Dear Madam President \u0026amp; Little Rock School Board Members\nWe the undersigned wish to express our support for McClellan Community Education. We feel that Community Education assists the Little Rock School District in fulfilling its mission to provide quality, integrated education to all patrons by providing numerous - courses and programs. Currently, Community Education offers educational programming for people of all ages. These programs include: Community Education courses\nthe McClellan Community Education Tutorial Program\n2 Cool 4 School Summer Day Camp\nACT Workshops and Lock-in\nand a variety of activities and services. We feel that it would be a great loss to McClellan and the community if Community Education was no longer available. Please join us in support of McClellan Community Education. Sincerely, McClellan Community Education Advisory Board Members / Student Patrons \u0026lt; (Lhsvel.a ___axad\u0026amp;icd I'l/nJir/ J^hki(KaMtoL. iL3lz2ZS13OOpLjQ(:^ L- ^nMLC..~ftHzinirk/)O lk)k)-\n|X (JUni-xvin, nna.Student Patrons ~ ~ ' u Wes^Jiffidfe^ bnC^Student Patrons a ia. 1 ,0 Ai^V \"7/z 3 J __w\\j Av-tJ\"-- I dm'] f n m? g [v^rs J (I'cprib JAiyryc ^xg?hQ \\ vrvC\\\\'\\\\\\O \u0026lt; \\^p\\a 0^ CXxkdA^ S\u0026lt;\n)^-s-___ P^T^O/V B^a-5 Id\n/ s -Student Patrons 9c\\r'\\rj')tiC P/L \u0026lt;73 ALiXAli^^^ Cr^Tli^ W l\u0026lt;i7Lf^l. arilL^iC 'IZZo'i P lC k CaV \u0026lt;1-. \\ 1^ trc ,tS'yo^i:xA^^c'gd~*^^'3 1 #?(vt: ~itTi\\ ^ZKY)^^ /6 2^. ^-^Sl \u0026lt; klUl^ j^ocU. 7^202. JS^'^ P,.k\u0026lt;tt'^ 3C:)2 7^. /(x\u0026gt; f S kkri __U,^C\u0026lt;S\u0026gt; ^hOMlAA. F\\!)M \u0026lt;37'-Ilb f^/e,Q/e '/Z'zoq \\^\\ s. \\xX^\u0026amp;\\g^ 5io^-^r6^ r n r?\\ /v\\I\\ O nr^fv^o QC^ijiiix qi(\\u yr^oodv.V 9^ n^ql\\jar^i^ ft\\(K'r-c\\AS LrO-^ Student Patrons (:^:(r/r\u0026lt;r'GS 7=^9 5+v^ick lav id (L\\j. ! .P \" - XI Phillips 2_ I KromIi (Tr^-r5p i v\\no. tno.(b/\u0026gt;\u0026gt;i.) Ll^. '?e2M 71, ^\u0026lt;17^ WvaJ/lcM. /..ft. 777Jfl /fl0r74.l\u0026lt;A-(lf\u0026lt;l W k.K iPmp.50n \u0026lt;^roi Kpiff))- P ).?. lif\u0026amp;h-brn'iL____LZ____1SS\u0026gt;c77 hasLc-J^^ llfeti/oti) 1^^. JJi. 7^7.01^1 Adult Patrons iCLVWVj,^^ Ai P/McA-f^^e, LoAp'Wu^ /'reZ//^ /) Ulf , /7e7so ~S/f(i7s6 a u'\u0026lt;7l' '^4' 72c: ? C Oti^ , t\\(^ ~iai\u0026amp;b D 7!^^ i44/^ e,^,2A L/7 7^7. 7zzg7o f^iTuj ^f7YyxPA7()Qin ^pJjj.yyyi DnVfc Li-M^ ^^cki I 7a0x^6 jbV?v^ Ucdl^c^ (d\u0026gt; JlZ^J '770^ 72^/7. ^X)AB77^y\\J\\aAK^j]PJazz\n?y^, 77ib!^ zTs., 1 7a -7A:i6\u0026lt;/ u 3/7 '^,7^ '/\\^ LjdiX'J a-t\u0026gt;i \u0026lt;7 C'- if7^ \u0026lt;4 774L^74 7\u0026gt;772(i4 cAQ/\\(^\u0026lt;i \u0026lt;^cu}lcrk^i5^i7e} M. MfM.ijr, i2. 7^b2s- icfa ^/?, fie / (TctM^ I401 uJakt^i.rx: LiMj,7Lj!',M'J^M cStg-phoG^^ LairnA ftibr i^h-V CLr. CA\u0026gt;Qe^~^3^lp -7^-^ fd Y)~W\u0026lt;jA^ g. ^/IjT^'yryd^ ( ^(jol7rdn7i.(J- ^/\n^t,3777 '77^7':i Adult Patrons v^/-7u/7 7^-71')^!^^ 7 7/,^ SbO. '7'^') -C- ciicY-iy u. Ed. \u0026amp;.)C 'tnrbe^ IoId^ ^^6fci/ib(Ar r4tS 7 i- 1 iir. /' . ,^ , -lastD^ /'lAA Z/.7 ! n C^J- 'Z Alo^c/e-^ 714 !/) / C A 72 ZlZf/C, A7C7^7c4, .ji.^tun Y/^1 lfO\u0026lt;^ (\u0026lt; L^ r c /,C-/.i^ ^C, ' A/L/, /AcJA^ ?W ^1_________p/L, o/nO^fy, :iiC 1/^1/ 77ai^f\\ /iscrn^tiamhf^AT^-C}/.Adult Patrons + cAv^ywiAOiu pvclj. l_/L.-l'!--l- fogwj^s m:.bp(\u0026gt;\u0026gt;aQ,Cktc o\ni\\p'\n^ yz-^,z'j !i.llJ A. WL s\n_: ^/ 17}kib-. /' 72~/^ VlljdY Y.2.\u0026gt;/- 'lv'.,i 23'^lil-rt^.tt.-lltoH :-------.......... i ^ro KU n (Uffl\u0026lt;: M -,-zM AA foy jf /)^ h / /j A A J [) l\\p A , f J^/t- 6-/2/p2- k^^Ok ru ^6//iA\u0026lt;zPi2\\^ ]\u0026gt;r, m\\A PO. UP. ,nd iPlD^7^C)Q ___1^007. 2^ j!^^' 2./^-/^ ^Mx^^ACk, /r}.^r}JP,I^.A^^ 27^-^ -f 1^11 'rCrff^p/tW jo=/^\u0026lt;^^^^Ld:j2 /2c^ C\\. Y \u0026lt;^fCi /Lt r16~vt ^Ztl J UJI PrtzM WtJ? !.- IaJ 1 V A Adult Patrons r/K? iVe^r ^STutzzW, ulX '[V\\(xA^AJl^JrJ^ (ja 1^/0 2 \u0026lt;y I SoLA-//ui?c.z.. L.!?. nSLAC^t ________f-O./^j41^15^M13.\n:iN-i\u0026gt;/3y UOzr. \u0026amp;.rk^2^ l^iJ^ ------------------------ Cjy^a 'Ti YajX^. 172.J3Z2^ \u0026gt; Va3.oI(\\c^x.5^ Qk\\ fbii /Ij l-l? '7'f'i.^'^ JL /y^ '2:i^2crs^ St^r-Lonrrl 'A k c AgspAdc. /^AMryJk l^Ll^-------------- lAJ^'vula. j-il(.i Oi^D, a \u0026lt;A\u0026lt;./\u0026gt;^ ' ^Idd/xfa/^ 1)/. 7-2S/j=1 '-m/j/u^yhMAJ- 1. //1135 \"Kt'\u0026gt;nJimi/i\\^iJ^JJ- ^A'AM'/jI'k^ '1jli. 2oo2^Oku // Adult Patrons /^iz-r S 7i^i------------------------- ^l?)lb'i/fA(ld hii/liDffl, Ac. l'0aL\\ l6j^, 4^. \\^JLlJLj O.iJ^___\u0026gt;^ao l^nLAli^^lJ:^ (tc 1^00 y^- Bl/v^Olf' iTt 1^'/ fyjL^ /o M,(K7' r. CxV'A^Srj .^Ci /^fhDxtA \u0026amp;iij^ Bif^i.n.d ZK 7,?\u0026lt;^^3~ 'noaoc^^y' KVIk^iuuI U) Ajlhuwl- 5^ rM .y^y yl/y y^ay Q'uKy ^^^e(rc-cL \u0026lt;,i/?/)^ 7Adult Patrons 15^/ '7^\u0026lt;^c /Lua. ^/1/1 \u0026lt;: IC ^^QVYf\\.\u0026amp;,^^ ^yteA. OVyif^k^Xi^^ , -\n^5//) ysi^3 5^/ McClellan Community Education 1996-1997 Revised Budget Administration: Full Time Employees: Director Office Manager Receptionist Total Full Time 38,404.56 20,663.13 11,558.00 $ 70,625.69 Full Time Employee Benefits: Retirement (12%) Hospital ($1,963.00) Life ($65.00) Di Lt (.587%) State Tax ($65.00) Hospital Indenity ($67.00) Dental (205.00) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 8,475.08 5,889.00 195.00 414.57 195.00 201.00 615.00 Total Benefits Total Administration Salary and Benefits $ 15,984.65 86,610.34 Part Time Employees: Night Supervisor Security Total Part Time Salaries 8,640.00 8,677.50 17,317.50 FICA Total Administrative 6,727.65 $ 110,655.49 MCE Tutorial Program $ 28,602.17 Total Projected Expenses $ 139,257.66 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $30,000 Operating Expenses are to be paid from Community Education's current Activity Account which has acccumlated to $53,160.06 since 1991. Page 1McClellan Community Education Student Programs McClellan Student Council ACT Tutoring Services ACT Lock-In McClellan CE Tutorial Program - A.M. \u0026amp; P.M. McClellan CE Homework Help Program 2 Cool 4 School Summer Day Camp Healthy Family Center Mentoring Case Management Educational Enrichment - 'Creative Arts Program' Tutoring Program LRSD Students K-121. 2. 3. 4. McClellan community education Community Education Program Needs/Interests Assessment Spring 1996 Have you ever taken a Community Education class? 44 Yes If not. Why not? no interest 4 not affordable 24_ no free time 90 No 26 didnt know about classes A no transportation 9 inconvenient time __ other\nplease explain What are the best days for you to attend classes/activities? Monday 47 Thursday 46 Saturday 55 Tuesday 14 Friday Do you prefer a class/activity that meets: 83 once a week 31 twice a week 18 on weekends 5. If on-site child-care were available while you attended class, would you take advantage of it? 26 Yes 77 No 6 If yes, what are the ages of your children needing childcare? 9 7 0-3 years 4-6 years _ 6-12 years 7. Do you have a problem with transportation which would prevent you from taking a class? Yes ^No 8. Are you most interested in taking a course: 3^ to refresh knowledge and skills of present job. 48_ to increase possibility for promotion in present employment. 41_ to learn skills required for different employment. 9 to return to college. 78_ for personal improvement or recreation. 9. Of the following classes/activities, please check the ones which interest you. A. RECREATION AND SPORT 4 Bridge 1^ Modem Dancing 1^ Square Dancing 10 Tennis 12 Softball 11 Basketball 2 Mens Calisthenics 4 GymnasticsZTumbling 6 Chess Ballet W Ballroom Dancing Golf U Volleyball Fishing 8 Wildlife/Hunting 4_5 Acrobics/Gym exercise B. C. D. DO IT YOURSELF 15 Plumbing 25 Landscaping/Lawn care 2D Fashion design 27 Interior decorating 16 Small engine repair 27 Foods/cooking 36 Auto care for women _2 Other ENRICHMENT COURSES 28 Reading improvement 5 Creative writing 14 Estate planning/wills 14 Oil/watercolor painting 13 Quilting _8 Stitchery 10 Guitar _5 Community theatre _P Macrame 4 Choral group 16 Foreign language _8 Advanced photography _2 Other HUMAN RELATIONS 13 Single parenting First aid/CPR _1 Coping with divorce Self-esteem 39 Home repairs 3^ Gardening 2i Upholstery 19. Sewing 11. Carpentry 16 Cake decorating 20 Furniture refinish/repair Speed reading Family finance 9 Jewelry making 5 Basic design in art 4 Leather craft 9 Knitting/crochet 10 Wood working 23 Flower arranging 1 Decoupage 5 Great books 1^ Basic photography 13 Calligraphy 13^ Parent effectiveness 1 Pre- \u0026amp; post natal Stress management 12 Family relations 3 Support groups (AA, NA, Co-Dependency, Cocaine Anonymous, ACoA) E. EDUCATION EMPLOYMENT 47 Introduction to Computers 23 Small Business Development _5 Electrical Technology _4 Real Estate _5 Professional Child Care 3 Food Service 27 Data Processing 11 Teaching Assistant n Literacy 19 Office Management _5 Commercial Drive Licensing 4 Basic Retail Clerking _6 College Math, Algebra 26 Accounting 23 24 2 Tj-ping/Kejboarding Clerical/Secretarial Marketing Patient Care Aide 16 Social Work Assistant 3 Building/Construction 2 Dental Assistant 3 Pilot License Testing 10 Banking 10 _5 0 Speed Writing Graduate courses Other 10. If there are other classes/activities which you are interested in, please list them. Tourism, air bursh painting, piano lessons, video production classeszor AD I i i / . 1 I f /1AJJ3 11. Please rank the top three (3) concerns you have for your communi ty/neighborhood. 14. Please check your appropriate age group and sex. 6_3_ Drugs 2^ Unemploym^ _3J Poor Citjf Se^cei 9 Health Cime 2 Public Transportation Violence 6 Houaing I Ediicationa! system \"\"41 Crime'*- H, Lack of recreation 1^ Lade of adult education opportunities 9 Lade of community pride 1^ Lack of afterschool program for youth 12. Would you be willing to serve on the Community Education Advisory Council to address problems and concerns of this community and school? 9 18-23 32^ 26 -45 3r 46 -'53 36 + ll'-Nto' \"Il Female IS. If McClellan'Community Education classes were discontinued, would you: 23 Yes 72 No 13. If yes, please give us your name, address and daytime phone number. Name: - \" 78 consider it a loss. Q not care. . - - 47 be disappointed. .'i. 72 expect a replacement. _5 give up on continuing your education. 4 figure that it was in the best interest of the Little Rock School District. 4 other (please explain) See below Address:\nu City, State: y,. Zip: Daytime phone number: 16. In support of McClellan Community Educaiton, I have enclosed a donation of: . $5.00 j:r.- 2 $10.00 _$25.00 .,' 4 I - other: $ m\nQuestion 15 Other: - Find another class - Oomnunity will lose excellent opportunity for learning. - Search for another way to get trining to inprove - Consider producing a 60 second publication service video to air oncable for informing the community about classes. 3I\nI IRepresentative Edward F. Thicksten P,O. Box 2019 Alma, AR 72921-2019 301-632-2117 Business 501-632-4288 Residence 501-632-2149 FAX STATE OF ARKANSAS COMMITTEES CHAIRMAN Joint Budget DISTRICT 11 Part of Crawford County MEMBER Education State Agencies and Governmental Affairs Joint Committee on Energy March 11. 1996 Ms. Linda Ponde.xter. President Board of Directors Little Rock School District S10 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Dear Ms. Pondexter: I am writing to you and the members of the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District concerning the McClellan Community Education Program. Please accept this letter as a statement of my support for the continuation of this valuable education program, which provides a myriad of educational services to the students of McClellan High School as well as to the surrounding community. In addition to working with the community to foster a strong learning environment and providing supplemental instruction to students who score below the 25th percentile on the Stanford 8 Achievement Test, the Director, Ms. Marion Baldwin, is actively involved in the development of programs and activities that address the educational needs of McClellans students. Ms. Baldwin also serves as an advisor to the McClellan Student Council. As the Chairman of the House Joint Budget Committee, 1 understand the difficult choices that must be made to ensure fiscal stabilitv and responsibility. However, I would encourage you to consider the totality of benefits provided bv the McClellan Community Education Program and continue to fund this worthwhile program. Thank vou for vour consideration in this matter If 1 may be of further assistance to y ou regarding this or an\\ other matter, please do not hesitate to contact me Sincereh. Edward F Thicksten State Representative cc: Dr. Henry Williams Ms. Marion Baldwin Jennifer Edwards 9211 Oak Grow Lana Utlla Rock, AR 722096222 Taiaphons (501)560-2067 To Whom It May Concern: It has come to n^ attention that the LRSD is considering cutting community education as a way of dealing with its budget crisis. I think that this would be an incredible loss to those of us who have utilized the community education program. I personally took the ACT prep course. My guidance counselor recommended the program to me after I took the PSAT and did very well on tny verbal section, but showed some problems with the mathematics section. After taking the prep course, I took the December ACT and scored a 30, this was the first time I had taken the ACT. The prep course for the ACT proved to be of enormous value to me. I received scholarships to attend TCU in Fort Worth, Hendrix in Conway, and UCA in Conw^. TCU and UCA both invited me to participate in die Honors Programs. These programs are for those students who are identified as having an enormous potential for contributing academically and socially to the university community. I am currently a member of the Honors Program at UCA. I have maintained my ACT scholarship for the four years I have been at UCA. I am a member of Alpha Chi, Psi Chi, and Who's Who, in part because of my participation in the Honors Prograco. The ACT prep course has proved invaluable to me. For a simple fee of S50.00, my parents and I have saved $8,000.00 in tuitioa Aldiougb the results will not be the same for every student, I strongly believe that the ACT prep course is a necessary part of the community education progranL ft can make the difference from being conditionally admitted, to being unconditionally admitted, ft has been my experience that this can make a big difference for many students. Sincerely, March 7, 1996 Mrs. Pat Leach McClellan Community High School Office of Community Education 9417 Geyer Springs Road Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 Dear Pat: Word Perfect 5.1 offered by the Thank you for teaching me --- McClellan Community High School Office of Community Education. I wanted to tell you how much easier you have made my workload. I can do a memo in less than ten minutes. I*7h came to this position at HUD in November 1995, it took me two hours, and I was wasting so much paper trying to learn. came to When I But when you told us about the \"magic\" key, (Fl) the first day you taught, it changed my whole life! I also appreciated the individual time The class was fun. 1 --- you gave to me when I did not understand how to do Your patience and calm voice were so much something, appreciated. Pat, be sure to our first day of class, to help us. tell Donna Larking that she was very good on She, also, gave us individual time Mrs. Roby's cookies were good, too! Sincerely, Carolyn Henry Multifamily Housing Representative Department of HUD 1/ cc: Mrs. RobyThrough the process of community education the Community Education Office fosters community support for McClellan Community School and the Little Rock School District. Via planned programs and activities the Community Education Office enhances community involvement and coordinates an education service for the community.For information regarding currently offered Community Education courses or to suggest possible course offerings for the future, please contact our office located at 9417 Geyer Springs Road Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 Phone: (501) 570-4149* r A/C'f'*^'/ \u0026lt; Zi Po X, -^ f ft _ _Jn.- \u0026gt;\u0026lt;A- * 1 McClellan community EDUCATION i c I O N Mt N I E T S c o M P U E R S nmw E N R I R E C R E A I O N l_ TVI N 1 i i 1 1 1995-1996\u0026gt;^0'' S\nV. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DI John L. McClellan Community High School 9417 Geyer Springs Road February 26, 1996 Phone 570-4100 Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 RECE5VED Linda Pondexter, President Little Rock School Board Slow. Markham Street Little Rock, AR. 72201 MAR 1 8 1996 Office of Desegregation Monitoring Dear Madam President \u0026amp; Little Rock School Board Members: We the undersigned wish to express our support for McClellan Community Education. We feel that Community Education assists the Little Rock School District in fulfilling its mission to provide quality, integrated education to all patrons by providing numerous courses and programs. Currently, Community Education offers educational programming for people of all ages. These programs include: Community Education courses\nthe McClellan Community Education Tutorial Program\n2 Cool 4 School Summer Day Camp\nACT Workshops and Lock-in\nand a variety of activities and services. We feel that it would be a great loss to McClellan and the community if Community Education was no longer available. Please join us in support of McClellan Community Education. Sincerely, McClellan Community Education Advisory Board Members lyvAjM) L 7 1 i I Student Patrons SOiMLAnkLO 7^ Al __/'l/rs}ir/ k^kovAflc (Lh^le,. /oh/i^ (^i^- ZSzii QJTL r ZZjJiLiik ''\u0026amp;tnMLL1Ht]ij.O^ 'Y^tri^cL^ Ikk'^k-__ (JjTli'XVin, vnj. W7^ M V@ JStudent Patrons Sc(\u0026gt;}iP~^_________ 6^\u0026lt;3/k2. ___________ I IStudent Patrons a 1 p txh, '^iVy P/z 13 coCi^ \u0026gt;^i(l_______________\\ ,____I_ m r g i v^tTs C\\?A ilticer5t'z JAtVyr ^bo \\C\u0026gt; \\vrvpV\\V\u0026lt;r^ AZ/c/-\\ol/:^5 '\\^p\\n Vgicx-^ ov 0f\\Aui5jA. iSz^ \u0026lt;-S H 5 Pq.(7| PEEOSJOAllM ^rPpP(f\\ b(5nPkVfn'f^Student Patrons ^3/)^ Pc f'-ljlf^AA K, 7A.t.U.'tfA [ __^i/J!^ .. 7J yJi\u0026lt;l-XTLH. LlvUlfia^ic lo. L,^J-Li\u0026gt; . -72.^! ^Sf^ Ylts t^trC .vS^XIg^x'x^v^cTcP^^B^ (.\u0026gt;?fvL .\u0026lt;}:LiLSbu\nU)^4^eck 72202. ^/YY}^ IG 2.^ X}\\k^ OtimA 363 /Jrf'/^fbdc /(jy fS ktn ,Cf^'A\u0026lt;kQi. kXD GiSt^s \u0026lt;\"\u0026gt;3 \\^V S .^MaJc/X. A)7/i, (\u0026lt;J-/-Oii\u0026amp;-17Zoq , . \\ kXirw^^Xt^jA BEibLJDeerJLacxhxj^^ jnpif\\C\\C\u0026gt;i TALe.Q-^ Khalifl Ph.ll.p-j Student Patrons 6^T^r\u0026lt;\u0026lt;S S4 yvi'ck (c\\v C,\\j, L^.f^ (ifitjz (Viu'e nAO.(b/h.tj L.^ 'IZ'lO'l Q'z:2(\\^ 2L_\u0026amp;u4ii_2iSJn^li^^ a3{, /pOpgl/A\u0026lt;\\jl W ffiQpa)D_^XlJLUDt-24^^ \npf^elrr i^rh'd L ^9S)O? i^eAi/oui pR. lji.. 7^7.a'j^Adult Patrons ftddi I) 1^4/7^ w 7 At/',/!\u0026lt;' 7:ic7C i44/^ At^.7ZZG6, flmj-nxii @jvHPA\u0026gt;6?^lr) '^pdij_Yr)(i DnV\u0026amp; Li-Me 4-! 0 e J/IAAre?7 {7',Ac3f 4^^, A^f^ 4^1 J/\\AAre?e-t e :i^ XzVTs^LQO^ /j cSxMt Ey2^ I^LU^ ly\u0026gt;^. A^6 'QQ I 740^ Y ^^AA^-VA^A^A^Adj AAaa^. '^/^./^. 41^1 ,7/// Z^4/^\u0026gt; A A ______ 'j/?^wA'4i4cyi' s/'n tmia __7f p * 3/^ 72^/^ 2k. !' lid. \u0026gt;^J^- ^(^15 fy}aJi4i k, -i)~ro7__ UJoackon cS\n)tspPwA\u0026lt;vl^irru Albri\u0026lt;jh-^ dr. L7, ^(\u0026amp;^aJ is \\/\u0026gt;dcc Ld^ Lk\u0026lt;^ IS -7^-^/?) ^/lj2AArry(7\u0026lt;r^ 3 ] ) ?)^)ri' Dr, 7)r,Adult Patrons Hp.n iu, /Q G\u0026gt;h. 1^0 4 A- Ar S bOMb-w-ub/^ NL pp puA A^/Ainy/AAA- Al yA/ 14 -tg. (}i^ XA CXy AfLzxl Io1o?\u0026gt; _An L.JC '^^0 3 ^// i.l'l''' -'-i :r 1 (^I^tAAOiy^ 44,, C^.xJ\u0026lt;\u0026gt;i4v^ / 0/^K^ c^^^y\\.fsLiA.^ L-) ^ I V SJj, ( 'c/ C} b. 0(\u0026gt;i/i^h____2 Ahc'rd^e/} C'J- 15 L, -z Q4 \u0026amp;. 7M AJlA, ArL f \u0026lt; ( f 2^/// ?k^ ____________p/b Oj//A(^^ qAA!/ (k^/i 'i\u0026gt; 3 ,-^#Z/ /V. '?:iA.D VT^/ar 4/LAdult Patrons . y^/l 222^2. eAvo^m^ q3\"iqiiz\n'D^.:^c, e/t. 7^t- fofaaicJ^ii rw, h)O^a.P\u0026gt; ,(M n\nno?s \u0026lt;2 C^atrtA s^. XQ^ WL 2 U. fh.UL haki2Biii\u0026amp;2i2\u0026lt; \u0026lt;ir7fjr^(\u0026lt;__ 7/ ij^kTtr. OiKt,^,A/?M- ')^2^.7' ,' yAl/JCckJl--Ik--.. ZA- 727jJY 23^ kA A. L7U.aH !DCi S^/r - C~[^ 7 2.7.'0^ ______________^(\u0026gt;90/^/./^AC y:3. I oy ^^lQ\u0026lt;L3iyy^^Ca^'ry^____^6/yAc\n^C2i4\\(^ Ivy'^C^/l^kk UO, ,nd iDlDlJc ^ij'/ /f/ __7^\n'6f Mx^Ck. 5?0/OreAA. /n.ii^n^.Q.A^. 1^i Ar, 'A,Adult Patrons A/|z\u0026lt;.ric/t U^Ob LdLL7?Ai^ '^OlVWI (1a 1^/02 ^OLVWt 6a f Pazm AU^x i7}ci^6i 'T^lTfx:^ 6^? c I ^c^7Zui?cZ nSL^C(\\ /f),(i^}iL^]/T/cil-J/JiAM-__7-^^^ 3''3~(:\u0026gt;6 ) j?s.^'V.^x^.Qsfc.iQi. X/T. 7^'^7 J'-^J3Z3^ iA3.biRnxc^ Qk\\ .Vj?iCOick).P I 7 J 7? '^ 0 2C,0 77. /-J 1/1/ SfriAJfwl -QA k i-AgSpAdf tAAZVdirw.llg IH O' - a s '77i-3as.- ^5-0 ( ^1 7^..Z'2SXi.'=1. 7/iAjL7/Kft^ //7a 07^ 7\u0026lt;i J(7^3^/) 77]F^i/r77(^ Sou2..I I I I I I I I Ss I Si '/1f^ IB //\" Adult Patrons hrlfiM'Ac,\n^2. ::? i J t^i'\u0026lt;^'^ i-t^-c- L 1^___UM hOA g4at. t^\u0026lt;' 1^. I.H.I, O.lIX- IbvUAli^il^l 1 \\ f / U^vyvvVtZt^Myy ,2--^ i . cl /2. ciVA\u0026gt;Hsrf + \u0026lt;^1 /^pzMvx^ ^Ccuv r)e\u0026amp;rMeoc\u0026amp;^- '^l-y)\u0026lt;y^ -*4 .2 Ai? MjM/ -r- Miiw'ntiTin f'ftMiiHMwrfliiirn'tiiTariit Adult Patrons 15^1 *7 ^/1/1 \u0026lt; /b\u0026lt;^J QVYrs.x\u0026gt;.^^ ^x^yizXvn fOSoo b5j^) fr)a}j^jAk-(14 1:25.:^^ y^i^3McClellan Community Education 1996-1997 Revised Budget Administration\nFull Time Employees\nDirector Office Manager Receptionist 38,404.56 20,663.13 11,558.00 Total Full Time $ 70,625.69 Full Time Employee Benefits\nRetirement (12%) Hospital ($1,963.00) Life ($65.00) Di Lt (.587%) State Tax ($65.00) Hospital Indenity ($67.00) Dental (205.00) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 8,475.08 5,889.00 195.00 414.57 195.00 201.00 615.00 Total Benefits Total Administration Salary and Benefits $ 15,984.65 86,610.34 Part Time Employees\nNight Supervisor Security Total Part Time Salaries 8,640.00 8,677.50 17,317.50 FICA Total Administrative 6,727.65 $ 110,655.49 MCE Tutorial Program $ 28,602.17 Total Projected Expenses $ 139,257.66 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $30,000 Operating Expenses are to be paid from Community Education's current Activity Account which has acccumlated to $53,160.06 since 1991. Page 1McClellan Community Education Student Programs McClellan Student Council ACT Tutoring Services ACT Lock-In McClellan CE Tutorial Program - A.M. \u0026amp; P.M. McClellan CE Homework Help Program 2 Cool 4 School Summer Day Camp Healthy Family Center Mentoring Case Management Educational Enrichment - Creative Arts Program' Tutoring Program LRSD Students K-12McClellan community education Community Education Program Needs/Interests Assessment Spring 1996 1. Have you ever taken a Community Education class? 44 Yes 2. If not. Why not? no interest 4 not affordable 24 no free time 90 No 26 didnt know about classes A no transportation 9 inconvenient time __ other, please explain 3. What are the best days for you to attend classes/activities? 67 Monday 47 Thursday 46 Saturday 55 Tuesday 14 Friday 4. Do you prefer a class/activity that meets: 83 once a week 31 twice a week 18 on weekends 5. If on-site child-care were available while you attended class, would you take advantage of it? 26 Yes 77 No 6 If yes, what are the ages of your children needing childcare? 9 T 0-3 years 4-6 years _ 6-12 years 7. Do you have a problem with transportation which would prevent you from taking a class? B DO IT YOURSELF 15 Plumbing 25 Landscaping/Lawn care 20 Fashion design 27 Interior decorating 16 Small engine repair 27 Foods/cooking 26 Auto care for women _2 Other C ENRICHMENT COURSES 28 Reading improvement 5 Creative writing 14 Estate planning/wills 14 Oil/watercolor painting 13 Quilting Stitchery 10 Guitar _5 Community theatre _P Macrame 4 Choral group 16 Foreign language _8 Advanced photography _2 Other D. HUMAN RELATIONS 13 Single parenting 22 First aid/CPR 1 Coping with divorce 31 Self-esteem M Home repairs Gardening 21_ Upholstery 19 Sewing 11 Carpentry 16 Cake decorating Furniture refinish/repair Speed reading Family finance 9 Jewelry making 5 Basic design in art 4 Leather craft 9 Knitting/crochet W Wood working 23 Flower arranging 1 Decoupage 5 Great books Basic photography 13 Calligraphy Parent effectiveness 1 Pre- \u0026amp; post natal 40 Stress management Family relations _ Yes IOOno 8. Are you most interested in taking a course: 3^ to refresh knowledge and skills of present job. 48_ to increase possibility for promotion in present employment. 41_ to learn skills required for different employment. 9 to return to college. 78_ for personal improvement or recreation. 3 Support groups (AA, NA, Co-Dependency, Cocaine Anonymous, ACoA) E EDUCATION EMPLOYMENT 9. Of the following classes/activities, please check the ones which interest you. A RECREATION AND SPORT 4 Bridge Modem Dancing Square Dancing 10^ 1 ly 2 Tennis Softball Basketball Mens Calisthenics 4 Gymnastics/Tumbling h Chess 4 Ballet W Ballroom Dancing (\u0026gt; Golf Volleyball Fishing 8 Wildlife/Hunting Aerobics/Gym exercise 47 Introduction to Computers 23 Small Business Development _5 Electrical Technology _4 Real Estate _5 Professional Child Care 3 Food Service 27 Data Processing 11 Teaching Assistant _0 Literacy' 19 Office Management _5 Commercial Drive Licensing _4 Basic Retail Clerking _6 College Math, Algebra 26 Accounting ^3 T^Tjing/Keyboarding ^4 Clerical/Secretarial 10 Marketing Patient Care Aide 16 Social Work Assistant 3 Building/Construction 2 Dental Assistant 3 Pilot License Testing 10 Banking 10 Speed Writing 5 Graduate courses 0 Other ___ 10. If there are other classes/activities which you are interested in, please list them. Tourism, air bursh painting, niarro lessons, video production classes11. Please rank the top three (3) concerns you have for your communi ty/neighborhood. 14. Please check your appropriate age group and sex. 62 Drugs Unemployment 3 Poor City Services 9 Healthcare 2 Public Transportation W. Lack of adult education opportunities 9 Lack of community pride 12 Lade of afterschool program for youth Violence 6 Housing 20 Educational system 41 Crime H Lack of recreation 2 32 32 18 18-25 26-45 46-55 56 + n. Male 34 Female 15. If McClellan Community Education classes were discontinued, would you: 12. Would you be willing to serve on the Community Education Advisory Council to address problems and concerns of this community and school? 23 Yes 7^ No 13. If yes, please give us your name, address and daytime phone number. Name: 78 consider it a loss. 0 not care. 47 be disappointed. 22 expect a replacement. _5 give up on continuing your education. 4 figure that it was in the best interest of the Little Rock School District. 4 other (please explain) See below Address: City, State: Zip: Daytime phone number: 16. In support of McClellan Community Educaiton, I have enclosed a donation of: _ $5.00 2 $10.00 _$25.00 other: $ Question 15 Other: - Find another class - Cemmunity will lose excellent oppoirtunity for learning. - Search for another way to get trining to inprove - Consider producing a 60 second publication service video to air oncable for informing the conmunity about classes.Representative Edward F. Thicksten P.O. Box 2019 Alma. AR 72921-2019 501-632-2117 Business 501-632-1288 Residence 501-632-2149 FAX DISTRICT II Part of Crawford County COMMITTEES STATE OF ARKANSAS CHAIRMAN Joint Budget MEMBER Education State Agencies and Governmental Affairs Joint Committee on Energy March 11. 1996 Ms. Linda Pondexter, President Board of Directors Little Rock School District S10 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Dear Ms. Pondexter: I am writing to you and the members of the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District concerning the McClellan Community Education Program. Please accept this letter as a statement of my support for the continuation of this valuable education program, which provides a myriad of educational services to the students of McClellan High School as well as to the surrounding community. In addition to working with the community to foster a strong learning environment and providing supplemental instruction to students who score below the 25th percentile on the Stanford 8 Achievement Test, the Director, Ms. Marion Baldw in, is actively involved in the development of programs and activities that address the educational needs of McClellan s students. Ms. Baldwin also serves as an advisor to the McClellan Student Council. As the Chairman of the House Joint Budget Committee, 1 understand the difficult choices that must be made to ensure fiscal stability and responsibility. However, 1 would encourage you to consider the totality of benefits provided by the McClellan Community Education Program and continue to fund this worthwhile program. Thank you for y our consideration in this matter If 1 may be of fiirther assistance to y ou regarding this or any other matter, please do not hesitate to contact me Sincereix. Edward F Thicksten State Representative cc\nDr Henry Williams Ms. Marion Baldwin Jennifer Edwards 9211 Oak Grove Lane Utile Rock. AR 722066222 Telephone (501) 560-2007 To Whom It May Concern: It has come to attention that the LRSD is considering cutting community education as a way of dealing with its budget crisis. I think that this would be an incredible loss to those of us who have utilized the community education program. I personally took the ACT prep course. My guidance counselor recommended die program to me after I took the PSAT and did very well on my verbal section, but showed some problems with the mathematics section. After taking the prep course, I took die December ACT and scored a 30, this was die first time I had taken die ACT. The prep course for die ACT proved to be of enormous value to me. I received scholarships to attend TCU in Fort Worth, Hendrix in Conw^, and UCA in Conw^. TCU and UCA bodi invited me to participate in the Honors Programs. These programs are for those students who are identified as having an enormous potential for contributing academically and socially to the university communify. I am currently a member of the Honors Program at UCA. I have maintained my ACT scholarship for the four years I have been at UCA. I am a member of Alpha Chi, Psi Chi, and Who's Who, in part because of my participation in die Honors Program. Ilie ACT prep course has proved invaluable to me. For a simple fee of S50.00, my parents and I have saved 58,000.00 intuition. Althou^ the results will not be the same for every student, I strongly believe that the ACT prep course is a necessary part of the community education program. It can make die difference from being conditionally admitted, to being unconditionally admitted. It has been my experience that diis can make a big difference for many students. Sincerely, J *March 7, 1996 Mrs. Pat Leach McClellan Community High School Office of Community Education 9417 Geyer Springs Road Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 Dear Pat: Thank you for teaching me Word Perfect 5.1 offered by the McClellan Community High School Office of Community Education. I wanted to tell you how much easier you have made my I can do a memo in less than ten minutes. workload. When I it took me camo to this position at HUD in November 1995, two hours, and I was wasting so much paper trying to learn. But when you told us about the \"magic\" key, (Fl) the first day you taught, it changed my whole life! came The class was fun. I also appreciated the individual time you gave to me when I did not understand how to do Your patience and calm voice were so much something, appreciated. Pat, be sure to tell Donna Larking that she was very good on She, also, gave us individual time our first day of class, to help us. Mrs. Roby's cookies were good, too! Sincerely, Carolyn Henry Multifamily Housing Representative Department of HUD I i 1/ cc: Mrs. Robyc 5 lUi a E o McClellan Community High School Office of Community Education 9417 Geyer Springs Road Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 Phone: (501) 570-4149 ol 111 BCl o 03 in \u0026lt;D McClellan Community Education is designed to develop a partnership between the school and community in order to provide educational opportunities and services to McClellan students, parents, other patrons. Little Rock School District employees, residents of Southwest Little Rock and neighboring communities.Through the process of community education the Community Education Office fosters community support for McClellan Community School and the Little Rock School District. Via planned programs and activities the Community Education Office enhances community involvement and coordinates an education service for the community.For information regarding currently offered Community Education courses or to suggest possible course offerings for the future, please contact our office located at 9417 Geyer Springs Road Littie Rock, Arkansas 72209 Phone: (501) 570-4149Willie J Edwards 9211 Oakgrove Ln Little Rock, Ar. 568-2887 pager 399-6111 Z/.y- ' rtB 2 .. 1995 CltiCO c! J\niirr. kuiuEianng 0 February 23,1995 Dr. Williams: I would to like to ask your help in a matter of great importance to me and a number ol other individuals. I have been with the McClellan Advisory Board since it's start .We have worked hard to bring about change for the better in our school and community. We had a wonderful relationship with the director and school board prior to August 93 In, or around, August of 93 the director, Malla Dagget, resigned. Brenda Scrimager was selected as the new director in December of 93. It was rumored then that this director, Brenda Scrimager, was telling different individuals that she would not work with this advisory board and counsel. It has become apparent that this rumor was true. Since Ms Scrimager was awarded this position, we have not had timely meetings and she has re\u0026amp;sed to follow bylaws, giving verbal degrading of advisory board and school administration and teachers that don't agree with her. It has come to light recently that the last board election was also rigged. I was informed today, February 23, at 8\np.m that she has now elected her own set of officers to help her proceed with her agenda. Please look into this matter because Community Education is one of the best things to come along in this district. Thanking you in advance, Willie J EdwardsL, i LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT John L. McClellan Community High School 9417 Geyer Springs Road Phone 570-4100 Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 Era Lao H MEMORAKDCM TO: Advisory Council FROM Scrimager DATE: February 27,1995 MAR Ci'ica d 1995 :cc'? RE: Executive Council elections Whoops my fault, this memo was found under my desk - Im sending the results of the Executive Council elections. If you have any questions please call me at 570-4149, I thought some of you may have forgotten because I havent heard from you in such a long time. D fe'. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT f.-i'x\"' B E John L. McClellan Community High School 9417 Geyer Springs Road Phone 570-4100 Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 MEMORANDUM A a TO: Advisory Council members MAR - 1995 FROM: ^^^'l^enda Scrimager ICI DATE: January 15, 1995 RE: Board elections Listed below are the names of the new C.nmmunity Education Executive Board. President - Bobby Thomas Vice President - John Twyford Secretary - Paige Beavers Treasurer - Kelly TuckerMarch 1, 1995 OHic- Vi This is just a reminder that the next Advisory Council meeting will be Thursday March 16, 1995. The meeting will last from 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm in the Media Center.\nMlf f 9 1995 LPSL 'SUPTS OF\"ICE Oc: t1PP 09 35 10:11 QdWti Mi '.liCi\"'':} / 254 FOl DRAFT I t i McClellan community education iPRooRAM The District remains supportive of the' \"community school\" concept which links citizens and their schools together in wavs that are mutually beneficial. n conanunity school The District has provided full financial support for four years providing time for the maturation and development of potential community partnerships. As articulated at the inception of the program, the district was to sustain the concept for limited period (need to verify the exact nu^^ of years in original planning framework) while practice and outside financial resources were I The District will provide one additional year of financial support allowing additional time for the status of self-sufficiency to attained. This would provide a total developmental time period of five years which is adequate for the community education concept to be embraced, adopted, and supported by the gowmunity. i According to the budget figures produced by the community advisory council, anticipated r6Ve~iiz..----- tuition will meet or exceed ^50,000 council indicates a projected dtS^ approximately $90,000. inusfi^enerated from class/coursa \u0026gt; The community advisory ict operational budget of The District will provide a budget of $40,000 to assist the commxxnity advisory council in the operation of the community education program for one additional year with the understanding that self-sufficiency must be attained by the 96-97 school year. program will remai.h housed at the McClellan High School. District will provide technical assistance to the Comunity Education Program in the form of grant writing expertise in securing funding sources. to assist review will take place mid-yelr so that all parties \" info-r-m-e-d-- -a-s- -t-o- --t-h-e- oprrooagrreessss bbeeiinnog mmaadn ea ktAowuaarv,d! achieving self-sufficiency status. The Distr4 will work with the McClellan Community Education to ensure that the integrity of the governance, and operations of the Community Education Program originally defined are recognized. Advisory -C structure, as ffencf. Little Rock School District MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Subject: Ann Brown, Federal Monitor Russ Mayo, Associate Superintendent jijtL August 15, 1995 Response to memorandum of August 9, 1995 4UG / 5 J995 Office of Dose^ The following is a response to your memorandum of August 9, 1995. My response to each of the three items is as follows: 1. We did not feel it necessary to do a plan modification for the McClellan Community School because all components of the program are being offered. We could find no reference to a minimum amount of money that must be budgeted for the program. Some money will come from other sources for this next school year. That which appears in our plan is more an historical account than specific action to be taken. The only exception is on page 94 as you 2. 3. have noted\nWe have reviewed page 94 of the desegregation plan relating to the McClellan Community School. The appropriate items from that page have been added to our list of obligations. I have requested a report of the status and progress of the McClellan Community School. When I receive it, 1 will forward it to you\nand. As noted in item 1 above, obligations relating to McClellan Community School have been added to the list. It now appears as a listing. If you have other questions, please let me know. C: Dr. Henry P. Williams, Superintendent Chris Heller, LRSD Attorney Jerry Malone, LRSD Attorney U.MCCLELDOCOffice of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 Date: August 9, 1995 To: From: Russ Mayo irown Subject: McClellan Community School As Im sure you know, the McClellan Community School program was incorporated into the current LRSD desegregation plan at the behest of the Little Rock School District Board of Directors, with the concurrence of the parties and the approval of the Court. As such, it is an important aspect of desegregation in the district. 111 appreciate the following current information about McClellan: 1. Please explain the statement, which appears in your July 13, 1994 memorandum to Dr. Williams, that \"McClellan was a reduction which does not require a plan change.\" 1 am puzzled by this assertion, because the desegregation plan clearly establishes McClellan as a community school, and court orders (for example, those of August 4, 1992 and December 30, 1992) have reemphasized the importance of the community school, the Advisory Council, and an adequate budget for the program. 2. Page 94 of the LRSD desegregation plan promises that ODM and other groups will regularly receive reports on the progress of the community school and any recommendations for changes. Please forward to me the school districts report on the status and progress of the McClellan Community School for the 1994-95 school year. 3. 1 note that the McClellan Community School is among those desegregation obligations that does not appear in your listing of \"Obligations from the Pulaski County Desegregation Case\" dated August 1995. Because the community school has been prominently featured in both the desegregation plan and court orders, please explain why it was omitted from your listing. Tlianks for your assistance. z c\u0026gt;z// e-/\u0026gt;/ Little Rock School District MEMORANDUM RECEIVED To: Ann Brown, Office of Desegregation Monitoring From: Russ Mayo, Associate Superintendent Date: September 5, 1995 Subject: McClellan Community School Report SEP 7 ms Office of Desegregaion Mcni\nipg Attached is the McClellan Community School Report you requested in your memorandum of August 9, 1995. C: Henry P. Williams, Superintendent Victor Anderson, Assistant Superintendent - Secondary PnnitaMcClellan Community Education Fiscal Year End Report for 1994/1995 Prepared August 16,1995 McClellan Community Education (MCE) has been in existence since the 1990-1991 school year. Initially a Three-Year Plan was developed which set for the goals of the program. Since its inception, MCE has provided a variety of programs and services to the community. By expanding the use of the school facility MCE as an anchor for the community. serves Program operations for 1994-95 were slightly impeded by the absence of an active director. Office personnel were challenged to maintain community support, input and participation. However, with the guidance and support of the McClellan Community School Advisory Council and a $265,000 grant to establish the Healthy Family Center (HFC) MCE was successful in its efforts toward these following goals: Goal 1. To enhance the educational format at McClellan through eradication of racial disparities on test scores. ACT Language taught by Shirley Ferguson with nine enrolled. ACT Math taught by Anita Henson with 15 enrolled. ACT Reading taught by Shirley Ferguson with 10 enrolled. ACT Science taught by Monica Parish with 16 enrolled. After school tutoring through HFC with 52 enrolled. Goal 2. To expand participation in Advisory Board. 8,000 class brochures mailed in the fall and spring announcing classes. 1,400 HFC monthly newsletters mailed announcing classes and services. 1,400 Summer Camp brochures mailed. 130 weekly MCE campus newsletters distributed on campus and to Advisory Board. Goal 3. To expand the use of the well-child clinic. Healthy Clinic renamed the Mala Daggett Health Clinic. Nurse Theresa Bour replaced by Karen Terry. Dr. Sam Schultz came for medical services on Tuesday afternoons. New COPE Representative is Mary Gupton who coordinates early childhood services. Established a new day care, IMAGE Day Care, at 65th and Butler. McClellan mothers and children were feed into the program. Day Care ran by Pastor Harville.Deborah Sweat, College of Nursing, come every other Friday for services, population and community of the goals and objectives of II Iw Qvl Offered classes taughf by local businessmen, community leaders, and senior citizens. Ron Walls taught Critical Thinking, Betty Turner taught Communications, Dr, James Parins taught Grant Writing, Rob Thrope taught Investments in the 9O's, Henry Rambert taught Ladies Car Maintenance, John Sanders taught Ballroom Dancing, Lisa Buckner taught Brochure Design, rack Carmichael taught Developing Your Child's Self-Esteem A _ I . . X _ \u0026gt; a** * Caroline Stanley taught Diamonds Are a Girl's Best Friend Jan Dean taught Yoga, Clergy involved the Community Education and Pastor Harville, program are William Reids MCE Director attended PTSA meetings and fielded questions from PTSA members. Goal 5. To expand the use of the School's facilities. Increase the number of recreational classes. .,^11 K II L- -------------- Recreational classes offered were volleyball, ballroom dancing and yoga. Established the HFC after school tutoring program. Held the 2 Cool 4 School Summer Day Camp on campus. Advertisement in class brochure for organizations, HFC, and PTSA. Task Force lifted canopy surrounding the auditorium, resurfaced the tennis court, and installed awnings on corridor walkways. successful in meeting some of its goals for the 1994-95 fiscal year. With meaningful input from the MCE Advisory Counal. collaboration with local businesses and organizations, and the support of the McClellan Community School and its patrons, MCE is currently in the process of establishing objectives for the 1995-96 fiscal year. Holding to the principle that education is our most valuable resource and believing that the educative process is the most important means of meeting individual and community needs MCE has conducted evaluation of campus resources. an II?patrons enroll in our computer courses. This requires that we have the most up-to-date computer technology available. Currently this is not the case. Attached is a needs request which was presented by the McClellan Business Department. Prior to the change in leadership for MCE, 15 computers were ordered (P.O. attached). This purchase order was cancelled however without Principal Jodie Carter's knowledge by the previous director. As a result of this action, MCE will be impaired in its delivery of services. an Since this time the McClellan Community Advisory Board has selected interim director. With the assistance of the MCE staff, HCF staff, McClellan Community School and the input, support and participation of the community, Marion Baldwin, Interim Director, is dedicated to the challenge of putting community education back on track.CKM ATTACHMENT 1 Little Rock School District In order to upgrade the McClellan Business Department, we need the following: Replace two computer labs with computers with 8 memory - Total number of computers in lab - 45 computers - Cost of each computer approximately $2,000 each. Printers Color and Laser 8 Printers - Approximate cost $10,000 Third Lab - Replace 12 computers - $2,000 each Two keyboarding rooms - Transfer equipment in the two labs to the two keyboarding rooms. (six new printers needed - Cost $2,000) Junior Executive Training and Marketing Classroom - Add ten computers Cost $2,000 for each computer Add four printers - Cost $1,400 New software needed for all classrooms - Cost approximately $5,000 ****** We do not meet the minimum standards required by the state of Arkansas. We must have memory of 8 or above to meet standards, teach WordPerfect 6.1 to meet standards. Also, we must At the present time, we have 80 computers, meet the required standards. Only eight of the computers 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)374-3361LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 'encoi E37 INVOlCeiN TRIPLICATE TO: LITTLE ROCK4OMOOL DISTRICT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 10 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 INfHUmES PERTAaiMa TO THIS ORDER , i KaaetMtcmnmtPUKCH/iSiNG V^_,lRTMeNT. LITTLC ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, tseo t STHSTRerr. LITTLE ROCK, AR 72202, PHONE NUMR (901) 324-2230. SEE TERMS ANO CONDITIONS BELOW u PURCHASE ORDE P/0 75001'19' IMPORTANT PURCHASE ORDER NUMBE MUST APPEAR ON ALL INVOICES, PACKAGES AND CORRESPONDENCE TO\nCOMPUTER WAREHOUSE 4000 LANDERS Rd AD S'.'171: 0 NORTH L.ITTLE ROCK. AR ^SHIP TO: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPPLY CENTER WAREHOUSE 1000 EAST SIXTH STREET DATE: 'ai 1? 525 LITTLE ROCK. AR (301) 324-2230 TuhN JEFFERS (Dellvwy Houra 8:M AM-3:30 PM) ATTN: COMMUNITY ED REQUIRED: 6/01/9S SHIP\nFOB LITTLE ROCK REQ: OOOO0O7B5 lANiT* Ol'AN . I v r rnnt I DESCRIPTION I DISCOUNT T UNIT PRICE TOTAL: 1 EA 1.74Q,0000 \u0026lt;?6 . 20.00 CWI ^i8S- i.N COMPUTERS, TOWER VERSION EA 99.0000 1 ,^85.00 SOUNDBLAS \"ER 16 VALUE EDITION 15 EA .0000 1,1Q5.00 CSlOOO tech speaker KIT EA 19.9500 299,25 AVI-CSIO u TECH HEADPHONE KIT ** T95-133 *** -4.^ Sub Total Taxes . 1 \"3^ '5 1,751.26 Pd. TOTAL 30,940.61 **********+ ORDER MUST BE IN ONE SHIPMENT, RECEIVED . INVOICE RECEIVED NO LATER THAN 6/9/95 IF YOU SHOULD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE call, r- rrv AT (501) 324-2260. THANKS ACCOUNT 16.00.00.3100.01 \u0026lt;560 AMOUNT 30,940.61 AS, CONDITIONS \u0026amp; INSTRUCTIONS: T'-f%rchaae vaNd only arhen signed by Director of Purchasing. 2. Goods to be deMvarad F.O.B. as per address in SHIP TO block. 3. Order may be cancaSarf lor poor delivery or if items are not as specified. 4. District will not honor any commitment made without a purchase order. 0. 5. Priof Io Of Included with shipment, please send Material Safety Data Shaal^^^lproducts conuinino haierdout aubatances or shipment may be refused. \u0026gt;' '.\u0026lt;ye * 'A. - -____. _________.uB /A T 6. Pnce increase or iocreaees in shipping cost in excess of $25 above total P.O. must receive prior school district approval. 7 Do not overship or substitute without prior Purchasing Department approval SCHOOL/DEPT. COPY APPROVED Purchasing Director mBBB s Al lAunntivi J LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT John L. McClellan Community High School 9417 Geyer Springs Road Phone 570-4100 * Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Dr. Vic Anderson, Associate Superintendent Secondary Schools Little Rock School District Jodie Carter, Principal McClellan Community High School August 16,1995 McClellan Community Education Director's Position The McClellan Community School Executive Board met Monday, August 14, 1995 and determined that Marion Baldwin will be the Interim Director. Advertisement for the Director's position will begin so that the vacancy may be filled. c: Dr. Richard Hurley, Director Human Resources RECE!V='' ***4$^ SEP ii I 1995 Office of Desegregation Monitoring ROCK SCHOOL !' DISTRICT John L. McClellan Community High School 9417 Geyer Springs Road Phone 570-4100 Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 AGENDA McClellan Community School Advisory Council Meeting Monday, September 25,1995 6:00 p.m. McClellan Media Center 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Vote on Potential Board Members (Mitchell Moore, Leatrice Russ, Charley, Hilton, Jr., Loletha Wilkins, Herbert Louks, Dudda Sanders) 4 Director's Report inclusive of Financial Report 5. Re-establish Committees 6. Tailgate Party Summary 7. Report on $50,000.00 City Grant 8. Report on Task Force Monies ($5,000.00) 9. Memorial for Mahlon Martin to SVIMC Cancer Center William Fields Kelly Tucker Nancy Reedy Willie Edwards Rosemary Lawson Bobby Thomas Jo Powell 4. EXTENDED EVALUATION of the MCCLELLAN COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL BUSINESS/COMMUNICATIONS MAGNET PROGRAM November 13, 1995 PROGRAM PBSCRIPTION PURPOSE The Business/Communications Magnet Program at McClellan Community High School was developed in the spring of 1992 as a means of achieving the desegregation goals of both the school and the Little Rock School District. The business/communications theme was selected because of McClellans already-existing business program, the largest in the district. The program was designed to serve students in McClellans attendance zone, students from other LRSD attendance zones, and students in the North Little Rock and Pulaski County Special School Districts. The program seeks to provide students with a comprehensive and equitable educational program that will 1) lead to a thorough knowledge of business and communications concepts, and 2) provide marketable skills in various fields of business and communications. SCOPE AND CONTENT McClellans Business/Communications Magnet Program actually consists of two separate programs of study: one in business and one in communications. However, since these two areas share many concepts and skills, several courses fall into both areas. Each of the two programs contains three strands from which students may choose. Although the strands share many of the same courses, there is enough difference to allow students to explore their specific interests. The three strands in the Business Magnet Program are: Business FYinciples and Management Marketing and Advertising Economics and Finance The three strands in the Communications Magnet Program are: Oral Communications Written Communications Visual/Product Communications In each of the six strands, students must complete prerequisites (1 unit), requirements (3/4 to 4 units), and electives (1to 2 units). There is a recommended, year by year plan for completing7 McClellan Magnet Page 2 these courses. If a student completes the 1 unit of prerequisites and 5'/4 units of required and elective courses, he/she is declared a magnet completer. The title \"Magnet Graduate\" is then placed on the diploma and final transcript, and the student wears a white cord with their graduation gown, signifying completion of a special course of study. PARTICIPANTS/BENEFICIARIES Any McClellan student may enter the Business/Communications Magnet Program providing they show interest in the program and voice their intent to complete a magnet strand. (If a students admittance into the program would cause the racial balance to go out of established boundaries, their name would be put on a waiting list\nthey can still enroll in magnet classes.) Students from outside McClellans attendance zone as well as students from the North Little Rock and Pulaski County Special School Districts may enter the program. At this time, however, only white students from these areas may enroll in the program due to the fact that McClellans overall racial balance is out of compliance with current guidelines. There are currently 203 students enrolled in the program, with 32 seniors, 112 juniors, and 59 sophomores. The racial balance is 58.6% black and 41.4% white. PROGRAM GOAL There are two program goals, or objectives, to be dealt with in this extended evaluation. 1. 2. The magnet component of the program will result in the further desegregation of the school by attracting M-to-M and out-of-zone students to the program.\" \"The costs incurred in the delivery of the magnet program are outweighed by the benefits of participation rates in the magnet program and the achievement of the participants.\" EVALUATION CRITERIA Evaluation criteria for this extended evaluation are whether each of the above program goals can be demonstrated to be in the affirmative. McClellan Magnet Page 3 EVALUATION RESULTS Evaluation results reflect data gathered from several sources. These data have been compiled and analyzed and yield the following results, presented in correspondence with each of the previously stated program goals (objectives). OBJECTIVE 1 \"The magnet component of the program will result in the further desegregation of the school by attracting M-to-M and out-of-zone students to the program.\" TABLE 1 M-to-M and Out-of-Zone Students at McClellan (Fall, 1995)* Black White Total Out-of-Zone 98 31 129 M-to-M (NLR) 1 0 1 M-to-M (PCSSD) 7 7 0 Total 98 39 137 from Student Assignment statistics (11/8/95) and the Board of Directors Meeting Agenda (10/26/95) DISCUSSION Table 1 shows that McClellan has attracted 137 M-to-M and out-of-zone students for the current semester. Of 177 non-black students enrolled at McClellan this fall, 39 (22%) of them have been attracted from other attendance zones or from out of the district. The total of 98 out-of- zone black students is curious, given that McClellans black percentage would be out of compliance even if the only black students enrolled were from the schools attendance zone. If these 98 out-of-zone black students had not been placed at McClellan, the schools black percentage would stand at 78% instead of the current 80%.McClellan Magnet Page 4 OBJECTIVE 2 \"The costs incurred in the delivery of the magnet program are outweighed by the benefits of participation rates in the magnet program and the achievement of the participants.\" Part A: Participation Rates TABLE 2 Participation Rates in McClellans Magnet Program for Each Year of Existence October 1992 57 October 1993 67 October 1994 150 October 1995 203 TABLE 3 October 1 Enrollment Figures for McClellan Since 1990 1990 1023 1991 1000 1992* 985 1993 886 1994 897 1995 904 First year of Magnet Program TABLE 4 October 1 Enrollment Figures for Other LRSD Area High Schools 1993 1994 1995 Central 1879 1637 1591 Fair 918 917 905 Hall 976 1031 928McClellan Magnet Page 5 Discussion, Part A McClellans Magnet Program continues to grow in popularity. Table 2 shows that enrollment in the program has almost quadrupled in the 3*/i years of its existence. Table 3 shows that a downward trend in McClellans enrollment ended soon after the inception of the magnet program and the extensive recruitment efforts related to it. While McClellan has enjoyed a slight increase in enrollment since 1993, the other LRSD area high schools have all shown a decrease, as seen in Table 4. Part B: Achievement of the Participants 1. McClellans overall scores on the Stanford Achievement Test have shown a general improvement since the Magnet Program began in the 1992-1993 school year. TABLE 5 McClellan Stanford Achievement Test Scores, Comparison Data for 1993-1995 10th Gr. BASIC BATTERY lOth Gr. COMPLETE BATTERY 1993 1994 1995 1993 1994 1995 Black 38.7 41.1 39.6 37.4 39.6 39.6 White 53.5 47.1 55.2 53.6 47.8 56.4 Overall 42.8 42.0 43.7 41.7 41.8 43.8 nth Gr. BASIC BATTERY nth Gr. COMPLETE BATTERY 1993 1994 1995 1993 1994 1995 Black White Overall 36.8 50.4 41.5 37.8 53.6 41.9 39.9 52.3 42.9 36.2 50.8 41.1 36.7 53.4 41.1 39 51 42McClellan Magnet Page 6 2. The Magnet Program has contributed to the honors and awards won by McClellan, its teachers, and its students. School Honors On December 2, 1995, McClellan will be named the recipient of the prestigious National Programs of Excellence in Business Education Award. Competing with schools from across the country, McClellan was chosen as the outstanding example of quality in business education in the United States for 1995. This award that names McClellan as the top business education high school in the country for 1995 will be presented at the national convention of the American Vocational Association in Denver. Teacher Honors McClellans Stephens Award winners for 1993 and 1994 were teachers in the Magnet Program. The innovative methods used in their magnet courses - Economics 1 \u0026amp; 11, Marketing, and Marketing Management - are part of the reason these teachers were singled out for these awards. Several Teacher of the Year awards have been shared by three McClellan magnet teachers since 1992. There have been five state level awards: Business Teacher of the Year, Vocational Teacher of the Year, Marketing Teacher of the Year, New Business Teacher of the Year, and New Vocational Teacher of the Year. There have been three national level awards: Region IV American Vocational Teacher of the Year, Region IV New Vocational Teacher of the Year, and Southern Business Education Teacher of the Year. Student Honors Involvement in the Magnet Program or in magnet classes has contributed to the success of several students and student groups. In 1994 and 1995, students in the magnet course Junior Executive Training have won first place honors at the Arkansas Executive Business Games. McClellans chapter of the Future Business Leaders of America is the largest chapter in Arkansas and it has won more awards than any other state chapter for the past several years. All FBLA members are involved to some degree in magnet courses\nalmost all magnet students are members. At the National FBLA Conference in 1994 and 1995, the skills students have gained in their magnet courses have contributed to the winning of several awards, including the award for top Annual Business Report in the country for 1995. Since the inception of the Magnet Programs, magnet students have used their business skills to achieve leadership positions in FBLA on the district and state level: District VIII president (twice), vice president, and parliamentarian\nand state vice president (twice) and president. National honors for individuals have gone to two students involved in the magnet program. In both 1994 and 1995, McClellan students were named the National Region 4 Outstanding Business Education Student by the American Vocational Association.McClellan Magnet Page 7 McClellan magnet students are also achieving on another level. Magnet teachers have received feedback numerous times through letters or phone calls as to the high skill levels found in their students. Employers tend to find McClellan magnet students better prepared for the workplace, both in business skills and human relations skills. Discussion, Part B As shown in Table 5, for the three years since the magnet program began, Stanford Achievement Test scores at McClellan have improved. The magnet program has in all probability contributed to this improvement. The substantial amount of equipment and materials brought into the school with the magnet program has benefited not only magnet students, but also a majority of nonmagnet students. A great many non-magnet students enroll in magnet courses, and almost every McClellan student benefits from the magnet computer labs. Increased levels of learning and thus increased test scores ~ may be directly related to the magnet-funded equipment and materials. The entire student body is reaping the benefits of magnet funding. The magnet program has also contributed to an increase in school honors. For a young program such as McClellans to win a national award for excellence is a testament to the hard work and dedication of the magnet teachers and staff. Word of the program has spread statewide, and now nationwide. This positive reputation draws attention to McClellan teachers and students and may contribute to their selection as honorees in various categories. With the upcoming national award, this winning trend should continue and increase. OBSTACLES TO GOAL ATTAINMENT OBJECTIVE 1 \"The magnet component of the program will result in the further desegregation of the school by attracting M-to-M and out-of-zone students to the program.\" This objective has been met to a small degree. Perhaps the biggest obstacle to attaining this goal was the high percentage of black students already present at McClellan at the inception of the magnet program in 1992. McClellan has had the highest percentage of black students of all LRSD high schools since 1990. This results mainly from the fact that McClellans attendance zone is heavily black. A year before the magnet program began, Student Assignment reported that McClellans satellite zone was 100% black and the remainder of McClellans zone wasMcClellan Magnet Page 8 around 65% black. It is understandable, then, that when the magnet program began in 1992, McClellans black population was at 67%. At that time, however. Central, Hall, and Parkview were still below the 60% level. Because other LRSD high schools had a more racially balanced population, the out-of-zone and out-of-district white parents may have simply refused to consider McClellan as a viable choice. As the percentage of black students in McClellans attendance zone, and thus at the school, has continued to grow, white parents from other zones and districts may continue to ignore McClellan as a choice for their children. Since McClellans attendance zone is saturated, with no room for new housing developments, and since there is a trend in the zone toward an increasing black population, this obstacle will become more and more difficult to overcome. McClellans current black population stands at 80%. To reduce its black component to even 65%, McClellan would have to attract about 210 additional white students from other zones and districts. This would be difficult for even the strongest magnet program. Unfortunately, McClellans magnet program has recently been weakened. Other LRSD high schools may now offer the courses Desktop Publishing / and II, two of the specialty courses that originally set McClellans program apart from other schools. At the same time, nothing has been added to the McClellan magnet curriculum to replace the loss of these two courses. This reduces the attraction of the McClellan program, providing another reason why parents would not look to McClellan as a choice. As more technology becomes available to all high schools, this trend will most probably continue. Much of McClellans current magnet curriculum may eventually be available at the other LRSD high schools. Unless a policy is adopted of continually adding new or more advanced courses to the McClellan magnet program, the program will eventually have no drawing power at all. A weakened magnet program and an attendance zone with a high black component: These are two serious obstacles to the achievement of Objective 1. OBJECTIVE 2 \"The costs incurred in the delivery of the magnet program are outweighed by the benefits of participation rates in the magnet program and the achievement of the participants.\" McClellan has been successful in increasing participation rates in the Business/Communications Magnet Program. Its magnet students - and non-magnet students -- have found success on many levels. However, many of the same obstacles to Objective 1 also apply here. Part A: Participation Rates At the time of the magnet programs inception in 1992, McClellans high black component (67 %) mirrored the black component of McClellans attendance zone (above 65 %). If McClellan had originally been given a more racially balanced attendance zone, and had thus kicked off theMcClellan Magnet Page 9 new magnet program with a racial balance similar to Central, Hall, or Parkview, one could speculate that more white parents from outside the zone and district might have considered McClellan as a viable choice. As already stated, this attendance zone problem continues to be detrimental to McClellan today. Part B: Achievement of the Participants Many factors, from state-of-the-art equipment to hard-working teachers and students, have contributed to the achievement thus far of McClellans magnet participants. As stated previously, this success has spread to the entire school. The hard work will continue, but the unbalance attendance zone and the weakened program may make it more difficult to attract students into the program. These weak areas will eventually begin to diminish success levels. RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendation 1 It is recommended that McClellans attendance zone be adjusted in such a way as to bring its black component more into line with the attendance zones of the other LRSD area high schools. OBJECTIVE The objective of Recommendation 1 is to provide McClellan with a more racially balanced attendance zone. Evaluation Criterion Evaluation criterion for this objective is whether McClellans attendance zone becomes more racially balanced. Expected Benefits McClellan will have an attendance zone with a racial balance more in line with the other LRSD area high schools. This new zone make-up will result in a more racially balanced student population for McClellan. This will in turn be an additional selling point for the school and its magnet programs. With a continuation of McClellans rigorous recruitment program, the racial balance of the school should experience even more improvement. Impact Analysis This recommendation will support the Desegregation Plan by providing McClellan with anMcClellan Magnet Page 10 attendance zone with a racial balance that is more in line with the other LRSD area high schools. This change in zones would most certainly be unpopular with the schools which would lose students. There is the argument, of course, that McClellans zone has been unbalanced from the beginning, and that McClellans extremely high black percentage demands quick and perhaps severe action. Risks of taking this recommendation include the possibility of patrons who are unhappy at the thought of their children attending McClellan. McClellans rigorous recruitment program, already in place, could offset much of these complaints. The risk of not taking this recommendation is that the racial balance of McClellans attendance zone will continue in the same direction, making the task of desegregating the school even more difficult. Resources Analysis Implementing this recommendation would take much study and planning by a number of district personnel. Board members, and possibly patrons. Force Field Analysis The primary supporters of this recommendation would be the staff of McClellan and the people of Southwest Little Rock. There is a large degree of unity in the neighborhoods of Southwest Little Rock, and these citizens could be mobilized to support this move. The main forces against this recommendation, of course, would be the schools that would lose students, as well as some of the parents whose children would be involved. The first force could be dealt with by comparing the racial balance of the other schools with the racial balance of McClellan\nthe fairness of this recommendation would be difficult to argue with. The second force could be influenced or won over by McClellans recruitment efforts. General Implementation Plan The officials assigned to carry out this recommendation would need to look at several possible ways of altering McClellans attendance zone, listing the benefits and drawbacks of each. Viewpoints of the principals of affected schools would need to be sought. Public forums might be held. Recomipendation. 2 It is recommended that the LRSD adopt a policy by which a new magnet course will be added to a schools magnet curriculum when one of their existing magnet courses is put into the general course offerings of the LRSD.McClellan Magnet Page 11 OBJECTIVE The objective of Recommendation 2 is to maintain or increase the ability of magnet programs to attract out-of-zone and M-to-M students. Evaluation Criterion Evaluation criterion for this objective is whether this policy is successful in maintaining/ strengthening magnet programs so that they remain attractive to out-of-zone and M-to-M students. Expected Benefits Magnet programs will continue to grow and be strengthened, allowing them to attract new students. Impact Analysis The most important positive impact of this recommendation is that magnet programs will be maintained or strengthened, allowing them to continue to attract out-of-zone and M-to-M students. This will support the Desegregation Plan. The risk of not taking this recommendation is that the LRSD may appear to be purposely weakening magnet programs which the courts have set up to further the desegregation efforts. Resources Analysis At McClellan, no new personnel will be needed unless there is major growth in the size of the student body. Existing magnet staff would teach any new courses. Many McClellan magnet teachers welcome the chance to take further training needed for new curriculum demands. The cost of new magnet courses would vary depending on many factors. The fact that a new magnet course is being added, according to this recommendation, means that a previous magnet course is now being expanded to all schools. The district should consider the cost of adding a new magnet course at the same time that they consider the cost of expanding an existing magnet course to all schools. Force Field Analysis The primary supporters of this recommendation will be magnet school personnel and supporters. These people should be enthusiastic about the chance for their program to grow. The primary detractors may be LRSD officials concerned about the costs of adding to the magnet curriculum. These costs, of course, can be avoided by choosing not to expand magnet courses to all schools.McClellan Magnet Page 12 General Implementation Plan When the LRSD considers expanding a magnet course to all schools, the magnet program from which the course is taken should be notified and asked to propose ideas for new courses to replace the course. The regular guidelines for new course proposals form, timelines, etc. -- would be used. Business Case is recommended___yes___no Plan modification is recommended___yes___no Overall recommendations are likely to have what type of budgetary impact: No budgetary impact___ Increased costs___ Decreased costs___G/- John L. McClellan Community High School A Business and Communications Magnet School RECESVFH FEB 7 1996 Principal\nJodie T. Carter Assistant Principals: Brenda Graham Everett Hawks Cherrie Walker Office of Desegregation Monitoring Dear Parents: The time has come! You and your freshman must decide which high school will best meet your needs. Academic offerings, specialty courses, athletic programs - these are all important factors to examine. How does McClellan rate in these areas? Academically, McClellan is equal to any high school in Arkansas. Our Honors Programs Advanced Placement courses in English, American History, European History, Biology, and French, as well as Honors classes in several subject areas - thoroughly prepare students for success in college. Several of our teachers have won Stephens Awards for excellence in the classroom, and we have several winners of national and state teacher-of-the-year awards. McClellan is academically sound! McClellans Business/Marketing Department was recently chosen as the top program in the nation for 1995-96! This award reflects the advanced and comprehensive instruction available in computers, business concepts, and communications that is available from our Business/Communications Magnet Program. This program has value for all students, regardless of their plans after high school. Knowledge of computers and good written and oral communication skills are necessary for success in almost any college endeavor or career. Our Magnet Program provides these skills. Well-equipped and well-staffed, this program has proven invaluable to many of our graduates. The strength of our athletic program is shown by recent Conference Championships in football, basketball, girls volleyball, and girls track. Our teams also compete successfully on the state level\nwe were State Champion Runners-Up in basketball (1993) and football (1994), and we are currently ranked near the top in the state in basketball. In addition to athletic skill, our coaches also teach character, as evidenced by our winning of the 1994 Conference Sportsmanship Award. Please examine the enclosed materials\nsee if McClellan might be the place for you. Call us at 570-4121 to schedule a visit or to talk to teachers, parents, or students. We want you to learn firsthand what McClellan Magnet High School can offer you! Sincerely, Steve Geurin Magnet Coordinator 9417 Geyer Springs Road Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 Phone 570-4100McClellan The Three Business Magnet Programs Means Business! THE POWER OF CHOICE... Every choice is the right choice when McClellan magnet students select an area of study. With six magnet strands to choose from in the fields of Business and Communications, McClellan students can spend their time exploring possibilities instead of facing limitations. 1 Business Principles \u0026amp; Management For careers and college study in business ownership and management, accounting, financial services, etc. Students take these required courses: Computer Tech: Business Applications Computerized Accounting I Introduction to Business Junior Executive Training 2 Marketing \u0026amp; Advertising For careers and college study in retail management, advertising, sales, marketing research, media, etc. 3 For careers and college study in banking, accounting, stocks and bonds, financial services, etc. Students take these required courses: Economics I \u0026amp; II Junior Executive Training Money \u0026amp; Banking Computer Tech: Business Applications Introduction to Business THE POWER OF KNOWLEDGE... With over 225 computers on campus, many of which are networked in state-of-the-art labs, McClellan provides a potential for learning that is unlimited. McClellan Business Magnet graduates-with their high degree of computer literacy and business sense-have more power in the tough world of higher education and careers. Elective courses include: Business Law Advanced Desktop Publishing At FBLA GOALS UTIL1ZEO Students take these required Advertising Fashion Merchandising Introduction to Business Marketing Marketing Management courses: Elective courses include: International Business \u0026amp; Banking Computer Tech: Database FIND OUT MORE... Call McClellan's Magnet Coordinator at 570-4121, or visit our campus at 9417 Geyer Springs Road. We think you'll be pleasantly surprised! Jt Elective courses include: Business Etiquette Entrepreneurship All magnet courses are available to any interested McClellan student. Enter The The Three Communications Magnet Programs Communications f EVERY CHILD IS DIFFERENT... Parents have always known it. Now at McClellan, we're addressing this fact by offering Communications Magnet programs in written, oral, and visual communications. Based on their own individual preferences, students can choose an area of study that will help them express their unique ideas in an exciting and productive way. A WELL-ROUNDED EDUCATION... Whether experiencing the excitement of broadcasting with our daily students-produced television news program, cultivating writing skills in our Communications Writing Lab, or creating works of art in our screenprinting/airbrush studio, McClellan Communications Magnet student are never at a loss for exciting educational activities. When combined with our Advanced Placement and Gifted \u0026amp; Talented courses, plus our in-depth computer curriculum, the Communications Magnet Program produces students who know how to communicate for success.! !\\ k I .1 . i 0 . 1 Written Communications For careers and college study in advertising, law, journalism, television production, technical writing, etc. Students take these required courses: Journalism I Journalism II Technical or Creative Writing Word Processing I \u0026amp; II Elective courses include: Mass Media Independent Study Desktop Publishing All magnet courses are available to any interested McClellan student. 2 Oral Communications For careers and college study in television and radio, public relations, law, speech pathology, interpreting, etc. Students take these required courses: Communications I Public Speaking Drama I Mass Media I \u0026amp; II Elective courses include: Drama II Debate s 3 Visual/Product Communications For careers and college study in commercial or graphic art, advertising, interior design, architecture etc. Students take these required courses: Art Design/Graphic Design Advertising Introduction to Painting Mass Media I \u0026amp; 11 Introduction to Art Elective courses include: Architectural Drafting Screen Printing/Airbrush John L. McClellan Community High School A Business and Communications Magnet School Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Non-Profit Organization U.S. Postage PAID Permit No. 2608 Little Rock, AR BROWN, JONATHAN M 1201 WELCH ST LITTLE ROCK AR 72202 i 11 It iiII II IIi! IlHililliiliilllllilllilJohn L. McClellan Community High School A Business and Communications Magnet School RECEIVES? fcrr.- FEB 7 1996 Principal: Jodie T, Carter Assistant Principals: Brenda Graham Everett Hawks Cherrie Walker Office of DesegregaiiOii Moniionng fcuJb. . Dear Parents: The time has come! You and your freshman must decide which high school will best meet your needs. Academic offerings, specialty courses, athletic programs - these are all important factors to examine. How does McClellan rate in these areas? Academically, McClellan is equal to any high school in Arkansas. Our Honors Programs - Advanced Placement courses in English, American History, European History, Biology, and French, as well as Honors classes in several subject areas - thoroughly prepare students for success in college. Several of our teachers have won Stephens Awards for excellence in the classroom, and we have several winners of national and state teacher-of-the-year awards. McClellan is academically sound! McClellans Business/Marketing Department was recently chosen as the top program in the nation for 1995-96! This award reflects the advanced and comprehensive instruction available in computers, business concepts, and communications that is available from our Business/Communications Magnet Program. This program has value for all students, regardless of their plans after high school. Knowledge of computers and good written and oral communication skills are necessary for success in almost any college endeavor or career. Our Magnet Program provides these skills. Well-equipped and well-staffed, this program has proven invaluable to many of our graduates. The strength of our athletic program is shown by recent Conference Championships in football, basketball, girls volleyball, and girls track. Our teams also compete successfully on the state level\nwe were State Champion Runners-Up in basketball (1993) and football (1994), and we are cunently ranked near the top in the state in basketball. In addition to athletic skill, our coaches also teach character, as evidenced by our winning of the 1994 Conference Sportsmanship Award. Please examine the enclosed materials\nsee if McClellan might be the place for you. Call us at 570-4121 to schedule a visit or to talk to teachers, parents, or students. We want you to learn firsthand what McClellan Magnet High School can offer you! Sincerely, Steve Geurin Magnet Coordinator 9417 Geyer Springs Road Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 Phone 570-4100rj McClellan 77ze Three Business Magnet Programs Means Business! THE POWER OF CHOICE... Every choice is the right choice when McClellan magnet students select an area of study. With six magnet strands to choose from in the fields of Business and Communications, McClellan students can spend their time exploring possibilities instead of facing limitations. THE POWER OF KNOWLEDGE... With over 225 computers on campus, many of which are networked in state-of-the-art labs, McClellan provides a potential for learning that is unlimited. McClellan Business Magnet graduates-with their high degree of computer literacy and business sense-have more power in the tough world of higher education and careers. FIND OUT MORE... Call McClellan's Magnet Coordinator a t 570-4121, or visit our campus at $417 Geyer Springs Road. We think you'll be pleasantly surprised! 1 Business Principles \u0026amp; Management For careers and college study in business ownership and management, accounting, financial services, etc. Students take these required courses: Computer Tech: Business Applications Computerized Accounting I Introduction to Business Junior Executive Training Elective courses include: Business Law Advanced Desktop Publishing All magnet courses are available to any interested McClellan student. 1 SVC j - i I i 2 Pag, ieit 2 Marketing \u0026amp; Advertising For careers and college study in retail management, advertising, sales, marketing research, media, etc. Students take these required courses: Advertising Fashion Merchandising Introduction to Business Marketing Marketing Management Elective courses include: Business Etiquette Entrepreneurship 3 For careers and college study in banking, accounting, stocks and bonds, financial services, etc. Students take these required courses: Economics I \u0026amp; II Junior Executive Training Money \u0026amp; Banking Computer Tech: Business Applications Introduction to Business Elective courses include: International Business \u0026amp; Banking Computer Tech\nDatabase CLUB /McClellan Means Business! THE POWER OF CHOICE... Every choice is the right choice when McClellan magnet students select an area of study. With six magnet strands to choose from in the fields of Business and Conununications, McClellan students can spend their time exploring possibilities instead of facing limitations. THE POWER OF KNOWLEDGE... With over 225 computers on campus, many of which are networked in state-of-the-art labs, McClellan provides a potential for learning that is unlimited. McClellan Business Magnet graduates-with their high degree of computer literacy and business sense-have more power in the tough world of higher education and careers. FIND OUT MORE... Call McClellan's Magnet Coordinator at 570-4121, or visit our campus at 9417 Geyer Springs Road. We think you'll be pleasantiy surprised! 1 The Three Business Magnet Programs Business Principles \u0026amp; Management For careers and college study in business ownership and management, accounting, financial services, etc. Students take these required courses: Computer Tech: Business Applications Computerized Accounting 1 Introduction to Business Junior Executive Training Elective courses include: Business Law Advanced Desktop Publishing FBLA GOALS UTILIZED MM All magnet courses are available to any interested McClellan student. 2 Marketing \u0026amp; Advertising For careers and college study in retail management, advertising, sales, marketing research, media, etc. Students take these required courses: Advertising Fashion Merchandising Introduction to Business Marketing Marketing Management Elective courses Include: Business Etiquette Entrepreneurship 3 For careers and college study in banking, accounting, stocks and bonds, financial services, etc. Students take these required courses: Economics I \u0026amp; II Junior Executive Training Money \u0026amp; Banking Computer Tech: Business Applications Introduction to Business Elective courses include: International Business \u0026amp; Banking Computer Tech: Database CLDB ... ' LRSD ADMIN. BULDING Fax:1-501-324-2032 May 20 96 17:07 P. 01/01 PRESS RELEASE 'J 4 PRESS RELEASE Jai.i fcjr\nLe firs^ annuv1 H'? * ?\nIT \"ration SatvrJ.^ June 8. 1935 4.1 cm s .rri. tc 5 0 . m . .rstfi'pue -Ciallar. 'ctiTi'.nuni cy Klah -ocated 4 L. (^ay^y 'if .OC 31C''uO ,6 Ai'kc ij MCcXC.\\ Wn^r,. *?!*? .a, -.'cpartm-ent ey Sapr.ist rr/j z of Hirr\u0026gt;-*.r i srv-ces, ci Health. Baptist\n4edina 0*\" Cftvrch, ano \"a.nv o *er aganc: . .. e R'\nc .ci-ocl Lx.at\"-.. .: through ^he Healthy Frirr' \\ er.tt'rgsncy gra f unc7\nnograr. of * 5. Eepar ,!ie. J-or Drug Iree Sch 'Ol? shq CorT..'.n j .. provioe f r .i n fcieakf.i sjf I nd 2u2Z^\\ !vi nun\n, matrons.. :3 J rh i.'*. ! i. a r-Rf\n'. t, certification. and ex.\n. th r f :: n f\u0026lt;z !: i on adou t ser'/t ces I zivs-z to Ij.it t:2e Rc^k Fi-Oi Co LhS' rrst regi strance. Door px,23 very honr. Be eur to jom the Healthy 3*iffi.Uy uelehr atxon on Saturday, June 8, 199s KdClellan Coiiuaunlty High Sehool. sen Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham. Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 Date: January 25, 1995 To: Jodie Carter, Principal, McClellan High School From: Horace Smith, Associate Monitor, Office of Desegregation Monitoring Subject: Magnet Program Information As part of ODMs ongoing monitoring of secondary schools with magnet programs, I would like to receive the following information regarding the McClellan High School Business/ Communications Magnet Program by Friday, February 10, 1995. If you have any questions or concerns, please dont hesitate to call me at 376-6200. Thank you for your assistance. Documentation Requested For each year since the programs inception, magnet program enrollment by race, sex, and grade level. 1994-95 magnet program course enrollments by course title, race, sex, and classification. For each year since the programs inception, the number of students new to the school attracted as a direct result of the magnet program by race, sex, and grade level. 1994-95 magnet program staff by race, sex, and the title of the magnet courses they teach. Furnish an existing comprehensive magnet program description (e.g. philosophy, goals, objectives, structure, curriculum) and any literature describing individual course offerings. Documentation of yearly recruitment activities by the school (e.g. recruitment committee meetings, presentations, site visits to the school by potential parents and students, recruitment visits by staff to other schools) since the programs inception.,7 Sc? 1 J f995 Office of Oese3rs33i\ncii (viociionny ^OU /:\\(Ze COlSPiALLV iNAZireP ro COMl Ff^z\u0026gt;A^, C^PT. 15, 6:00 T^.H. e\u0026gt;y \u0026gt;iC:LCLAtj CDUCAHOW ^oLn J^cClellan CommunUiiji \\\\ie7tjTy A Business/Communications Magnet TELEPHONE 570-4100 9417 GEYER SPRING ROAD LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72209 September 22, 1995 SEP 2 7 1995 Dear Friends: Office of Desegregaiiofi Monitoring On Sunday, Auditorium October will be 1, 1995, dedicated the at Oma G. John L. Business/Communications Magnet High School. 'tfacovelli McClellan The program will start at 3 p.m. honoring Mrs. Oma G. Jacovelli who was a dedicated public servant. Mrs. Jacovelli worked untiringly for the Little Rock and Pulaski County Schools and was a special friend to education in all areas. Because of her commitment to our schools. it is very fitting that McClellan's Auditorium is being renamed in her honor. Please join the faculty and staff of McClellan, the Little Rock School Administration, the Little Rock School Board, and the Jacovelli family at this dedication ceremony and at the reception to follow. .incerelyV ^die Carter \"Principal og/^jygs 13:36 501 324 2023 LRSD COMMUNICATI ODM 002/002 I 1 ! i y J I Little Rock School District ( 1 1 Media Advisory I i September 29, 1995 Dedication of Oma G. JacoveUi Auditorium For more information: Dina Teague, 324-2020 1 i i The auditorium at McClellan Business/Communications Magnet High School will become \"The Oma G. JacoveUi Auditorium\" during a dedication ceremony Sunday, October 1 at 3:00 p.m. at the school. ! Mrs. JacoveUi was a member of the LRSD Board of Directors from December of 1987 until her death last March. She was a founder of the Community School which is located at McClellan High School and was a strong advocate for all schools in southwest Little Rock. i Family members, LRSD administrators and board representatives, members of the school staff, and other community leaders will speak at the dedication ceremony. ### I ! i-.c \u0026lt; I LITTLE I \u0026gt;4 I I ' ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT John L. McClellan Community High School 9417 Geyer Springs Road Phone 570-4100 Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 October 15, 1995 Ms, Ann Brown Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 East Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 PCT 1 7 1995 Office of Desegrasaiioc. Dear Ms. Brown: Thank you very much for coming to McClellan on Sunday, October 1, to help dedicate the Oma 0. Jacovelli Auditorium. We know that you are a very busy person, and we appreciate your helping us make this an outstanding day for the family and friends of Oma. She would have loved the day I Your speech was fantastic I You were truly superb. The family. administration/faculty/staff, and friends of Mrs. Jacovelli were so excited about the remarks made on that day. You are such a caring person, and we thank you sincerely. It was very special. Also, thank you very much for the many things that you do for our school and for all the schools in Pulaski County, made a difference, and we appreciate you very much. You have really If we can ever do anything for you, please do not hesitate to let us know. We all care all John L. McClellan so much, and we will continue to work very hard to bring the best education possible to our students. Sincerely, Phy 14. its Smit id acul t yTS t a f f / and Administration A Business/Communications Magnet G .1 d .3B!?I Jsi/ G iiuonri^ Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 376-6200 Fax (501) 371 -0100 November 20, 1995 Mr. Jody Carter, Principal McClellan Community High School 9417 Geyer Springs Road Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 Dear Jody, The Office of Desegregation Monitoring is preparing a monitoring report on the secondary schools in the Little Rock School District which have magnet programs: Central High School, Dunbar Junior High School, Henderson Junior High School, and McClellan High School. 1 am writing this letter to ask your assistance in gathering data and in establishing a schedule for monitoring visits. The report will be written in eleven sections: (1) enrollment and recruitment, (2) staffing, (3) themes, (4)curriculum and instruction, (5) discipline, suspensions, expulsions, (6) guidance and counseling, (7) student achievement, (8) parent and community involvement, (9) facilities, (10) transportation, and (11) finance and budget. To the extent it is practicable, the report will focus on the magnet program and its effects. We will gather much of the data from district files but will need your assistance in collecting information available at school. I will visit with you in person before the monitoring visit to discuss procedures and to establish a monitoring date. Please have these items available to us during the monitoring visit: 1. A copy of the master schedule 2. Class enrollments for courses identified as magnet offerings 3. Program and course descriptions for magnet offerings as available 4. Curriculum guides for magnet curriculum as available 5. Textbooks and manuals used in magnet courses 6. Descriptions of enhancements of the magnet program as available 6. Brochures and other printed material related to student recruitment and parent involvement 7. A building floor plan.We will also need your help arranging interviews with appropriate staff in these areas: 1. Guidance and counseling 2. Magnet curriculum 3. Recruitment 4. Parent and community involvement 5. Desegregative effects of the magnet program. The district staff have offered to assist with data collection regarding enrollment, discipline, achievement, transportation, and budget. I will call you soon for an appointment that will allow us to clarify issues related to this report and to establish a schedule of monitoring visits. Gene Jones Associate Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arltansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 MEMORANDUM Date: November 28, 1995 From: Gene Jones To: Jody Carter Subject: ODM Monitoring Visit This memorandum is to confirm Thursday, December 7, 1995, as the date for the ODM monitoring visit to McClellan High School. The ODM staff will arrive at 9 a.m. and remain until the relevant data for the magnet program has been compiled. We will come to your office for a brief conference with you or those you designate. Please be prepared at that time to direct us to those staff members with access to information necessary for monitoring the items on the monitoring guide as we discussed during our recent visit. Thank you for the hospitality and candor you have shown us during this process.Office of Desegregation Monitoring Uniled States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 December 11, 1995 Mr. Jody Carter, Principal McClellan Community High School 9417 Geyer Springs Road Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 Dear Jody, Thank you for the hospitality extended to the ODM monitoring team last Thursday. The information packets you prepared for us made the visit workable and enabled us to gather the needed information quickly and handily. Steve Guerin was particularly helpful to me in gaining and understanding of why programs developed in their unique ways. The classroom visits gave us a one-day view of the magnet programs that will be useful in analyzing the desegregative effects of your efforts. The students were orderly and helpful to us as we moved around the campus. The result of the monitoring will be a report on the four LRSD secondary schools with magnet programs. We expect it to be issued in the spring of 1996. Your good work at McClellan is apparent, and I wish you continued success. Sincerely, Gene Jones, Associate Monitor12/11/95 10:52 QoOl 324 2023 LRSD COMMUNICATI ODM 002/004 -.1 Little Rock School District News Release McClellan Named Top Business School in the Nation December 11,1995 For more information: Dina Emfinger, 324-2020 LITTLE ROCK McClellan Business/Communications Magnet High School was named the recipient of the 1995 National Programs of Excellence Business Education Award at the National Vocational Conference in Denver, Colorado on December 2. This award signifies that McClellan's business department is the top business education program in the nation. As the winner, the department received a 'plaque, a $1,000 award, and an all-expense paid trip to the conference for one member of the department. Entries for the award were judged in many areas including business faculty, facilities, curriculum, departmental philosophies and objectives, student organizations, honors, award, and recognitions. Recommendation letters from principal Jodie Carter, students, and personnel from the State Department of Education were included in McClellan's entry. The McClellan High School business program offers more business courses and has more instructors dedicated to its business department than any other school in the state. In addition to the high school offerings, McClellan provides an excellent program of adult classes. (more)12/11/95 10:53 501 324 2023 LRSD COMMUNICATI @003/004 ODM ' McClellan Named Top Business School in the Nation December 11,1995 Page two of three The business program also supports the largest Future Business Leaders of America (FBLA) chapter in the state and one of the largest Distributive Education Clubs of America (DECA) chapters. McClellan business students have won hundreds of awards from both organizations and are elected to their respective state and district offices each year. \"I think that the selection committee was impressed that it did not take a brand new school with endless resources to create a such a successful program,\" said Phyllis Smith, business department chair. \"The determination and teamwork of our staff members are what make our business program an outstanding one.\" Students see that teachers will give extra time needed to make each project successful. The business faculty makes every effort to do their part to carry out the activities necessary to help students flourish and learn. Ms. Smith and Tony Hunicutt attended the conference in Denver. Other members of the business department are Angela McCallie, Shirley Hodges, Audrey Sinith, feri Bob King, Nancy Leslie, Pat Leach, and Brenda Stuckey. ' Ms. Smith is currently the President of the National Association of Classroom Educators in Business Education. She is also the local advisor and District VUI (FBLA) Coordinator in Arkansas. In 1992, Mrs. Smith was named the FBLA Advisor of the Year, and she was honored on the state and national level. She has been named the Arkansas Business Teacher of the Year twice and was named the National Economics Business Teacher of the Year in 1986 and National Business Teacher of the Year in 1988. McClellan Business/Communications Magnet Program High School enrollment is open to students living in its attendance zone and to other students who wish to apply for the magnet program. In addition to the magnet program, McClellan offers a full standard curriculum, advanced placement courses, a gifted and talented program, and honors classes. McClellan also hosts a Community (more)12/11/95 10:54 Q501 324 2023 LRSD COMMUNICATI ODM 004/004 McClellan Named Top Business School in the Nation December 11,1995 Page three of three School which offers tutoring programs, ACT prep courses for McClellan students, night classes for all ages, and summer programs for children and teenagers. Pre-registration for the 1996-1997 school year will be February 5-16,1996. For more information on enrollment, call McClellan at 570-4100, or the LRSD Student -Assignment Office at 324-2272. NOTE: Dr. Henry Williams will recognize Jodie Carter and Phyllis Smith of McClellan High School and will congratulate diem on receiving this award by presenting a Superintendent Citation to the school at the regular board meeting December 21. on ###1.2/11/95 10:52 501 324 2023 LRSD COMMUNICATI ODM @002/004 . r I 5 3 Little Rock School District News Release McClellan Named Top Business School in the Nation December 11,1995 For more information: Dina Emfinger, 324-2020 LITTLE ROCK McClellan Business/Communications Magnet High School was named the recipient of the 1995 National Programs of Excellence Business Education Award at the National Vocational Conference in Denver, Colorado on December 2. This award signifies that McClellan's business department is the top business education program in the nation. As the winner, the department received a plaque, a $1,000 award, and an all-expense paid trip to the conference for one member of the department. Entries for the award were judged in many areas including business faculty, facilities, curriculum, departmental philosophies and objectives, student organizations, honors, award, and recognitions. Recommendation letters from principal Jodie Carter, students, and personnel from the State Department of Education were included in McClellan's entry. The McQellan High School business program offers more business courses and has more instructors dedicated to its business department than any other school in the state. In addition to the high school offerings, McClellan provides an excellent program of adult classes. (more) I12/11/9J5 10:53 501 324 2023 LRSD COMMUNICATI ODM 0003/004 I ! McClellan Named Top Business School in the Nation December 11,1995 Page two of three The business program also supports the largest Future Business Leaders of America (FBLA) chapter in the state and one of the largest Distributive Education Clubs of America (DECA) chapters. McClellan business students have won hundreds of awards from both organizations and are elected to their respective state and district offices each year. \"I think that the selection committee was impressed that it did not take a brand new school with endless resources to create a such a successful program,\" said Phyllis Smith, business department chair. \"The determination and teamwork of our staff members are what make our business program an outstanding one.\" Students see that teachers will give extra time needed to make each project successful. The business faculty makes every effort to do their part to carry out the activities necessary to help students flourish and learn. Ms. Smith and Tony Hunicutt attended the conference in Denver. Other members of the business department are Angela McCallie, Shirley Hodges, Audrey Smith, Jeri Bob King, Nancy Leslie, Pat Leach, and Brenda Stuckey. Ms. Smith is currently the President of the National Association of Glassroom Educators in Business Education. She is also the local advisor and District Vin (FBLA) Coordinator in Arkansas. In 1992, Mrs. Smith was named the FBLA Advisor of the Year, and she was honored on the state and national level. ' She has been named the Arkansas Business Teacher of the Year twice and was named the National Economics Business Teacher of the Year in 1986 and National Business Teacher of the Year in 1988. McClellan Business/ Communications Magnet Program High School enrollment is open to students living in its attendance zone and to other students who wish to apply for the magnet program. In addition to the magnet program, McClellan offers a full standard curriculum, advanced placement courses, a gifted and talented program, and honors classes. McClellan also hosts a Community I (more)12/11/95 10:54 501 324 2023 LRSD COMMUNICATI ODM @004/004 McClellan Named Top Business School in the Nation December 11,1995 Page three of three School which offers tutoring programs, ACT prep courses for McClellan students, night classes for all ages, and summer programs for children and teenagers. Pre-registration for the 1996-1997 school year will be February 5-16,1996. For more information on enrollment, call -McClellan at 570-4100, or the LRSD Student Assignment Office at 324-2272. NOTE: Dr. Henry Williams will recognize Jodie Carter and Phyllis Smith of McClellan High School and will congratulate them on receiving this award by presenting a Superintendent Citation to the school at the regular board meeting December 21. on j i ### I IO'- w ep AGENDA McClellan Community School Advisory Council Meeting Monday, March 25,1996 6:00 p.m. McClellan Media\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_632","title":"Little Rock Schools: Washington Magnet Elementary","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1990/2002"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Washington Magnet Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","School management and organization","Educational statistics","Educational law and legislation"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock Schools: Washington Magnet Elementary"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/632"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nBooker T. Washington Famous Educator Bom a slave, Washington was educated at Hampton Institute in Hampton, Virginia. In 1881, he founded Tuskegee Institute in Alabama. Tuskegee gave blacks a vocational education\nit taught trades and scientific methods of farming. Washington was honored by Harvard University and Dartmouth College as an outstanding leader in education. CERTIFIED STAFF 1 Principal 1 Assistant Principal 2 Curriculum Specialists 2 Counselors 1 Resource Teacher 1 Full-time Nurse 2 Media Specialists 1 Young Astronaut Specialist 2 Music Specialists 1 Math Specialist 1 Science Specialist 2 Reading PAL Specialists 2 Math PAL Specialists 2 Art Specialists 1 Computer Lab Specialist 2 Physical Education Specialists 1 Speech Therapist 1 Learning Lab Teacher and Regular Classroom Teachers Booker T. Washington Magnet School \"Exploration, Invention, and Discovery - The Fun Way to Learn\" SPECIAL ACTIVITIES Choir Young Astronaut Program Citizens of the Month Gifted and Talented Program School Spirit Day Art Exhibits/Contests Book Fair Math Fair CARE Red Ribbon Week Young Astronaut Day Computer Exposure (K-6) Young Inventors Competition Read-a-thon Math-a-thon P.T.A. V.I.P.S. Cheerleaders \"Just Say No\" Club Holiday Parties Odyssey of the Mind Math Olympiad Writing Across The Curriculum H5 W. 27th Street Little Rock, AR 72206 324-2470 Karen J. Buchanan, Principal PHILOSOPHY The philosophy of Washington Basic Skills/ Math-Science Magnet School is to provide educational experiences that meet the needs of all children. To accomplish this end, teaching styles will be matched to learning styles to create an atmosphere where student growth will be assured. A comprehensive educational program will promote intellectual growth, social interaction, development of self worth, acceptance of responsibility for learning, and appreciation for cultural diversity. - to develop values, aspirations, and attitudes that promote the individuals personal involvement with the environment and society: and - to understand the interrelationship of mathematics and science with other subject areas. GOALS CURRICULUM OVERVIEW The goals of Washington Basic Skllls/Math- Science Magnet School are: - to develop the highest possible competence in academic skills and concepts\n- to nurture the student's mental processes: - to foster self-discipline: Washington Magnet School's overall objective is to ensure that each student obtains a minimum of 85% mastery of the basic skills curriculum. The curriculum includes language arts, mathematics, reading, social studies, science, fine arts, and physical education, with additional emphasis on a hands-on approach to math and science education. - to develop task commitment and self-moti - vatlon\n- to help students understand how science works, how it can be useful in daily living, and how science and technology affect society\n- to help students acquire confidence in using mathematics meaningfully\nInstructional activities are presented through child-centered classrooms, large group instruction, effective classroom management, standard basal textbooks, curriculum units and resource materials. A computer lab, math lab, science lab, \"Young Astronauts Program,\" field trips, guest speakers, and specific math/ science projects enhance mathematics and science core curricula. - to give attention to and value science and mathematics as endeavors of human beings from all racial, ethnic, and cultural groups: Sixth grade students are assessed for prealgebra aptitude and grade level math skills. Placement in pre-algebra is based on high assessment in both categories, parental consent, and student motivation. STUDENT APPEARANCE AND DRESS CODE Experience indicates that there is a real connection between proper dress and grooming and the successful operation of the educational system. A reasonable dress code policy will be formulated by parents, teachers, and the school administration. This policy wUl assist the student In setting a standard for his/her personal appearance which directly affects attitude and behavior and indirectly affects the learning process. The policy vzill be disseminated to parents early in the summer so that \"back to school\" clothing can be selected. PARENT'S CONTRACT Every parent will be required to sign a contract at the beginning of each school year. A sample contract is found below. My child (complete name) is presently enrolled in the ----------- grade at Washington Magnet School. As a parent I agree to provide positive support for the philosophy, program and goals of the Washington Magnet School and will: - attend regularly-scheduled and specially- called teacher/parent conferences\n- cooperate with the school when disciplinary actions are necessary\n- support school rules and policies: - ensure the student's compliance with the dress code policy\n- provide a proper study environment and require completion of homework as assigned: - ensure prompt and regular school attendance\nand - be an active member of the parent/teacher organization. I agree with the fundamental principles as stated above and will assist the staff with my support. I am aware that my child's continued enrollment in Washington Magnet School is contingent upon my honoring this contract. Date Parent/Guardian's Name Student's Signature Parent/Guardian's Signature Address (home) phone # (work)OFFICE OF METROPOLITAN SUPERVISOR 201 EAST MARKHAM SUITE 510 HERITAGE WEST BUILDING LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 WASHINGTON ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL ENROLLMENT September 28, 1990 TEACHER GRADE TOTAL WHITE BLACK OTHER % BLACK Miller P-K 20 9 11 0 55% Cenire P-K 21 9 12 0 57% Robinson K 20 8 12 0 60% Sellers K 18 7 11 0 61% Thomas K 18 10 8 0 44% Boyce K 18 8 9 1 50% Steinkamp K 17 6 9 2 53% Moran 1 21 6 15 0 71% Perez 1 23 6 16 1 70% Keith 1 19 6 13 0 68% Ford 1 21 5 15 1 71% Brown 1 17 4 13 0 76% Comer 1 22 7 15 0 68% Boyd 1 20 5 15 0 75% Thompson 1 21 6 15 0 71% Jackson 2 23 7 16 0 70% Chandler 2 23 11 12 0 52% Jenning 2 23 10 13 0 57% Williams 2 22 7 14 1 64% Shackleford 2 22 9 12 1 55%WASHINGTON ELEMENTARY ENROLLMENT- page 2 TEACHER GRADE TOTAL WHITE BLACK OTHER % BLACK Scrubbs 3 23 11 12 0 52% Schoessel 3 23 12 11 0 48% Rhea 3 23 11 12 0 52% Wood 3 22 11 11 0 50% Clark 3 24 12 12 0 50% Kelly 4 24 8 16 0 67% Johnson 4 23 9 14 0 61% Morris 4 24 10 13 1 54% Callaway 4 23 9 14 0 61% Morgan 5 23 7 16 0 70% Moore 5 24 12 12 0 50% Taber 5 24 12 12 0 50% Guin 5 24 13 11 0 46% Raper 6 25 12 13 0 52% McCleein 6 28 14 12 2 43% Hunsoker 6 28 16 11 1 39% Resource 9 2 7 0 78% TOTAL: 803 327 465 11,.V'' -s 'ff ^1 I .V ao 11 7*^ - / Wn*^ 91 \u0026gt;^.Ai\u0026gt;.\u0026lt;^ '3- ^\"Ui Q - :iS .U K\\\\y\\.cvf\\ - ki I. -P. XvtctR \" -At51A- ' *^y\\(ru/'v\\ I - 15 - S - 5-1 0- .13--^ ' n O- -is -53.- IW a 0 . -IS'-'^' -o IS G \" ^1 j9x-.u - as r SiA.\" Ui ?AuuaW^ - 0 - - o- ^@-\u0026lt; \u0026gt; % As^\\\u0026lt;^ I' _ Q?Sl -/s^- o - J^- 11- S 3 -Rvj5Jix,-0-.iq, - 3- - t) 'iQ . pf\\(rv^^\u0026lt;A^ (\"13 (^zMoj^aXvv^-C H 4 - 9 VkkAsJ) 1 IS _-. rTi IA * nA O - /b-o- w- Ai- a^ Lfi j*R.Q\u0026lt;/^isb^- O - .(5 ^\u0026gt;p ^^5 I \u0026lt; Y\\\\^ C5U3LVv\u0026gt;. IK .\\4 - 3^'^ ^1 I I n 4 OFFICE OF METROPOLITAN SUPERVISOR 201 EAST MARKHAM SUITE 510 HERITAGE WEST BUILDING LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 WASHINGTON ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL ENROLLMENT September 28, 1990 TEACHER GRADE TOTAL WHITE BLACK OTHER % BLACK Miller P-K 20 9 11 0 55% Cenire P-K 21 9 12 0 57% Robinson K 20 8 12 0 60% Sellers K 18 7 11 0 61% Thomas K 18 10 8 0 44% Boyce K 18 8 9 1 50% Steinkamp K 17 6 9 2 53% Moran 1 21 6 15 0 71% Perez 1 23 6 16 1 70% Keith 1 19 6 13 0 68% Ford 1 21 5 15 1 71% Brown 1 17 4 13 0 76% Comer 1 22 7 15 0 68% Boyd 1 20 5 15 0 75% Thompson 1 21 6 15 0 71% Jackson 2 23 7 16 0 70% Chandler 2 23 11 12 0 52% Jenning 2 23 10 13 0 57% Williams 2 22 7 14 1 64% Shackleford 2 22 9 12 1 55%WASHINGTON ELEMENTARY ENROLLMENT- page 2 TEACHER GRADE TOTAL WHITE BLACK OTHER % BLACK Scrubbs 3 23 11 12 0 52% Schoessel 3 23 12 11 0 48% Rhea 3 23 11 12 0 52% Wood 3 22 11 11 0 50% Clark 3 24 12 12 0 50% Kelly 4 24 8 16 0 67% Johnson 4 23 9 14 0 61% Morris 4 24 10 13 1 54% Callaway 4 23 9 14 0 61% Morgan 5 23 7 16 0 70% Moore 5 24 12 12 0 50% Taber 5 24 12 12 0 50% Guin 5 24 13 11 0 46% Raper 6 25 12 13 0 52% McCleein 6 28 14 12 2 43% Hunsoker 6 28 16 11 1 39% Resource 9 2 7 0 78% TOTAL:: 803 327 465 11 58%M-to-M TRANSFERS TO WASHINGTON Washington became an interdistrict magnet school beginning with the 1990-91 school year. Below is Washingtons five year enrollment, based on October 1 enrollment figures. BLACK WHITE OTHER TOTAL % BLACK 1988-89 0 0 0 0 0 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 510 438 480 483 313 356 332 11 519 762 841 822 98 57 57 59 8 1 5 7 As reported by NLRSD and PCSSD, below is the number of students sent to Washington by NLRSD and PCSSD on M-to-M transfers. NLRSO PCSSD TOTAL 1990-91 73 61 134 1991-92 65 74 139 1992-93 64 65 129 As reported by LRSD, below is the number of students Washington received from NLRSD and PCSSD on M-to-M transfers. NLRSO PCSSD TOTAL 1990-91 57 43 100 1991-92 65 74 139 1992-93 55 58 113 Prepared by Office of Desegregation Monitoring June 8, 1993.IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ___ EASTER'-!' FILED U.S. ri EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION COURT ARKANSAS FEB 1^1591 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. LR-C-82-866 CAR By: / PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS STIPULATION AND CONSENT ORDER CONCERNING ADJUSTMENTS TO SETTLEMENT PLANS The undersigned parties agree and stipulate as follows: 1. This stipulation is necessary to resolve student assignment questions in the Little Rock School District (LRSD) so that LRSD can proceed to notify its patrons in a timely manner about student assignment options and procedures. 2. The parties have been proceeding during the 1990-91 school year under the terms of desegregation plans different from the plans approved by the Court of Appeals on December 12, 1990. The Court of Appeals recognized that a transition to the settlement plans would be necessary: \"It may be necessary. in order to make smooth transition, for the details of the settlement plans to be adjusted to produce an appropriate fit between their future application and existing circumstances. The parties should be able to agree as to whether any such adjustments are necessary, and, if so, what they should bbee.. Absent such agreement, tthhee DDiissttrriicctt CCoouurrtt is authorized to take such action as may be just.\" a LRSD V. PCSSD. Slip Op. p. 58 (December 12, 1990). 1 3. The Court of Appeals also noted that the parties \"are free, by agreement, to modify the settlement plans by incorporating in them one or more provisions of the Tri-District Plan, subject. of course, to the approval of the District Court. fl Id. at 56. 4. The changes to the settlement plans set forth in this document are drawn from the Tri-District Plan, were implemented during the 1990-91 school year, and are necessary adjustments to the settlement plans to produce an appropriate fit between their future application and existing circumstances. 5. Washington School was a racially identifiable black school during the 1989-90 school year. Washington opened for the 1990-91 school year as a racially balanced (57% black) magnet school. Washington should continue to operate as a magnet school. 6. The settlement plans would establish Dunbar Junior High School as a computer science/music magnet. Dunbar is presently operating as an international studies/gifted and talented magnet school. The racial balance at Dunbar has improved from 79% black during the 1989-90 school year to 64% black for the 1990-91 school year. Dunbar should continue to operate as an international studies/gifted and talented magnet school. 7. An Early Childhood magnet component was added to Rockefeller Elementary School for the 1990-91 school year. The racial balance at Rockefeller has improved from 86% black during the 1989-90 school year to 72% black for the 1990-91 school year. The Early Childhood magnet program at Rockefeller should be continued under the settlement plans. 28. McClellan High School has become a community school under the terms of the Tri-District Plan. The designation of McClellan as a community school has increased community involvement in the school, including the establishment of a Community Advisory Board. McClellan should retain its status as a community school. 9. The settlement plans should be adjusted to continue the programs described above for the 1991-92 school year. The parties anticipate that these adjustments will be a part of the final modified settlement agreement to be submitted to the Court in March. JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Street BY: Ji in Walker Little Rock AR 72201 BT: ChrisjttoopDhheerr HHeellllar 1 * WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 BY: BY: Sam Jom Ste' 'Jones MITCHELL 1014 Wes Little Rock, \u0026amp; RQACHELI .JThird P.A. BY:G\n72201 / Richard Roachell IS SO ORDERED this day of February, 1991. Susan Webber Wright'' y United States District Judge 3 MEETING ON NOVEMBER 19, 1991 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS RECEIVED JJN 6 !S92 TO: FROM: December 19, 1991 Board of Directors Office of Desegregation Mcniioi'ing Ruth S. Steele, Superintendent of School THROUGH: 2 Tony Wood, Deputy Superintendent Ivey, Manager of Support Services SUBJECT: NEW PARTNERSHIP: Booker T. Washington Math/Science Magnet School and The Olive Garden Restaurant I recommend that the partnership between Booker T. Washington Math/Science Magnet School and The Olive Garden Restaurant be approved as follows: Booker T. Washington Math/Science Magnet and The Olive Garden Restuarant have united as Partners in Education for the 1991- 92 school year. The students at Washington Math/Science Magnet School will provide art displays for all the major holidays. They will also send homemade birthday cards to the employees of The Olive Garden. The Olive Garden will sponsor field trips to demonstrate to the students how pasta is made. They will also provide resource speakers for various subject areas and events. In addition, The Olive Garden will participate in the cafeteria behavior incentive program in cooperation with the LRSD Food Service Department and in accordance with federal. state. and District guidelines governing school lunch programs. The school has been very pleased with the positive improvements in students' behavior while in the cafeteria and the students are eager to demonstrate appropriate table manners and noise level because they are eager to receive the Olive Garden's incentives. ! 7 D ' (V Bernd DA?E speciaisy^ RE : Budget Reductions I am writing in Citice of Deseg: ja'icn twcn: uhi.h , /egard to the proposed budget reduction which would elminiate 21 ' media clerk positions. Our media center clerks do much more than certified school librarians with ordering books and equipment\". This year at Washi \"assist the School, our staff completed I and maintaining at Washington Magnet teachers for materials to over 10,148 request from found in our curriculum guides. meet and extend the objectives The clerks at Booker T oouner i. xi,y uuii magnet Bcnool oversee students with research topics including young astronauts studies, the P.E. Free Flow and assist science fair projects, Washington Magnet School Department's black history biography reference questions. . _ unit, and daily X X x Their daily assistance enables objectiJerfounrjn'\"*^! 2-.^:instruction covering curriculum. hands-on me to in the Language Arts and Social Studies The Washington Magnet Media Center program I know you also find this our students because you decided effective. is quite program benefical to positions in the initial cuts. not to elminate these - -------- It is also you know by making these cuts you same\". It is ironic that as the Pulaski County School Di ' ' reassuring that same. \"can't promise that wfl ar-l -istrict is reinstating their library their .iZtakeL clerks, Perhaps we should learn f The LRSD must also be held accountable for potential changes scores. of the daily services of the Media Specialists are able to teach tested on both the MPT and Stanford 8 tests. Last year our r gra e scores in Study Skills Table of Contents 86%, in future test library clerks, accountable for Because and Stanford 8 tests, students had the following on the MPT: - skills 88% . Dictionary 93%, Contents 92 This year the graphs 92%. scores were: Dictionary 86 graphs , Table of Our 6th grade students also showed skills section. Last year the scores were: proficiency on the study resource materials 96%\na., This year our scores were: and charts, glossary 89 %\n88%\nand charts, tables and graphs 88%. glossary 92%\ntables and graphs 88%. resource materials With more clerical responsibilties placed on the Media Specialists, less teaching will take place and students will be less prepared for the higher level thinking on the tests and in their daily work. skills foundI understand that cuts must be made. I feel, however, that these cuts should be made in areas not directly affecting the students. Media Center clerks work on a daily basis with children encouraging them to read, research, and use their minds. One should also be aware of the message these cuts will be sending to our students which is reading and reference skills are not important. These are learning skills our students will use their entire life. Please think about the impact on our students before you make this drastic cut. cc: LRSD Board Members Ann Brown, Office of Metropolitan Supervisorbook er T. 115 West Washington Math/Science Magnet\n7th Little hook, Street Ark ansae 7\nJudge busan Webber Wright United States District Court 'i\u0026lt;ca Post U++ i Box J J 16 Little Rock, September 21, Arkansas 1793 SEP 2 1 1S93 Olfico oi 1 Dear Judge Webber Wright: the We are first , deeply concerned by the Magnet school. third , and fifth grade overlo 1evels , Wa s a surp1 us of Based on state m i mum c1 a two students, our students, and our fifth grade has third g t~ a. c has a As an interdistrict magnet cents gton igned hla-n r first surplus gr: of to ence has seven surplus of two students. school , it we were to recruit throughout the school wss our understanding that when our cl asses are at ma mum received two new students: capac ity'\n' year . In one How can this continue 1 ast grade. feel the in the third grade and one hr iday we in the fifth Both grades were already over the state class size limit. administration desegregation 3urely, pl an without may be it was never the considering foil owing intent of the the the intent 1etter of ot We the the court to permit plan. discourage new students at Washington Math/Science Magnet cl ass size to penalize Magnet school . incentive school students assigned to Washington school or to Math/Sc ience It has been Magnet school our understanding that the Washington school program, wh i ch IS compr i sed of to Math/Science our school children, would not reach the maximum class size limits. incentive is so 1arge, we have a 1arge Since (22-44 students per grade level). number of high risk students spec ial program) programs \u0026lt; i.e . , science It 1 abs , 1 s \u0026gt; our math understanding that our ch i1dren and to were mandated by the court to help 1 aps , meet the young needs astronaut of these not be overcrowded. increase academic achievement. Lab situations should school Recently, district we noticed in the newspaper that each Pulaski was asked to better educate its teachers about County demands and requirements of the courtordered desegregation plan. are concerned that we will be out of the We p 1 an compl iance with the desegregation if our class sizes are at the maximum or above the state 1imits. We fear that we are not meeting the needs of populat ion. It is our incentive school must ' have twenty our understanding that classes for these students or 1 ess cannot be in the best per c 1 as s or el se a ful1-t ime interests of aide. these at-risk students to It havetwenty-eignt by- I aw , r twentynine students in cl ass , even i + It IS all owed + rom The two possibi 1 ity grape ot 1evel3 torming sp 1 It cI asses has been comb med students. with a maximum class size will ment i oned . comprised burely, or tn 13 not best meet the studen needs Of our We have heard that some area enough then students. ten student-\nconsolidated and i 3 It true that Coul dn ' t the Math/Science Magnet This elementary schools some area school some o-r these do cl asses not have surplus teacher(s) school? by large class size. IS a timely- concern. be smal1 er nave 1 ess be reassigned to Wasn1ngtcn Each day students-' October . possible. i st dead line. . Thank you. Decisions must be made be-tore the F'l ease respond to tnis 1ives are concern state 1 as impacted imposed soon as Sincerely, Mary Lcrtp Kahler, Curriculum 3 iahler , Specialist Hl isa Ford, First brade Level Chairperson Eric Coleman, Third Grade Level Chairperson Tommy Wal ker, Fi-fth brade Level Chairperson 3 usan Schoessel, Fourth Gra Grade Teacher Nettie Epps, Primary Science Specialist ntermediate Science Specialist R. e Barnes, Primary Math Specialist ' II xiiior y I Paula Smith, , ^ntermediate Math Specialist Nava Gazitt, Young Astronaut Specialist Ginny ^lotti, Media SpecialistEstelle Matthis, Interim Superintendent Ann Brown, 0+tice o+ Desegregation Joshua Interveners c/o -John Wal ker Frank Martin , Larry Robinson, Karen Buchanan , Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association Assistant Superintendent Principalbooker 7 Wasmngton Matn/bcience Hagnet 115 West 27th Street Little Rock, Arkansas School (if\nDr. Henry Williams Superintendent of Schools SEP 9 8 Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Fock, Arkansas Office -Of DessgrogaiivT 3 Dear Dr. Williams, :0'z We are pleased to have the discuss our building concerns. opportunity to meet with you and month involved is our district scheduled As you know, Therefore, in the presentation of faculty meeting. the first Monday of e h we suggest a meeting the meeting on Uctober 4, Many of us are time of 4:00 p.m. 199S . However, 1st is the state deadline for reporting student attendance. meeting before that date can better facilitate willing to meet at an earlier date. October If ci solution , we are most Please consider our 1etter of interest and We want hept ember z.'l , insight inviting those individuals who received copies 1993 . of into these Each of these people has particular i ssues you to understand that this group of teachers a building level concern. We appreciate your concern for the needs of forward to our meeting. reoresents our students and I ook hincerel y ,y k.aarbler, Curriculum Specialist Alisa Ford, Cd First brade Level Chairperson Eric uoleman, Third brade Level Chairperson Tommy Walker, Fifth Grade Level Chairperson busan bchotssel, Fourth Grade Teacher ' Nettie f / s, Primary Science Soecialist 11 Path r 1 ti e Ul,C dsr , int mediate bcience SpeclaI 15 Rose Barnes, Primary Math Specialist Paula Smith, Intermediate Math Specialist Nava bacitt. g istronaut Specialist S i n n V Media bpecialist Estelle Mathis, Deputy Superintendent Judge Susan Webber Wright, Eight District Court Ann Brown, dt+ice a-f Desegregation Joshua Intervenors c/o -John Walker Prank Martin, Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association Larry Robinson, Karen Buchanan , Assistant Superintendent Principal ILLLLHSi \\ \u0026gt;\u0026lt;\u0026lt; 5\u0026lt; LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL J DISTRICT RECEIVES? NOV 0 2 1993 Office of Desegregation Monuig Booker T. Washington Magnet School 115 West 27 Street Phone 324-2470 Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 October 28, 1993 Dear Little Rock School District Patron: A worthwhile and rewarding program at Booker T. Washington Magnet School, 115 West 27th Street, needs your assistance. The program, STOP (Students That Officially Patrol) Club, is an endeavor that seet^s to teach elementary school students about respect, leaderslrip, scholarship, cooperation and manners. The goal of the program, which has been implemented in the Little Rock School District, is in its fifth year, to help motivate, educate, and improve the self-esteem of students in grades 1-6. We would like for you to serve as an interviewer of prospective STOP Club members. This marks the second year that interviews will be held for students who have expressed a desire to become a member of the STOP Club. The interviews have been scheduled to be held from 11:15 a.m. to 12:30 p.m., on Wednesday, November 24,1993, at Washington Magnet School. We ask that you please arrive at 11:00 a.m. for a brief orientation session. Enclosed you will find information concerning the program, its goals, and past activities. If you can assist in the interviewing process, please contact Mrs. Janet Miles Tippings, the school's secretary, at 324-2470, by noon on November 19, 1993. (Friday) We thank you in advance for leading your valuable time and expertise to this program. We look forward to seeing and hearing from you... P.S. Please Join In With Us To Help Save The Children Fro^ Destruction... Respectfully, Portia Lan^right,,.CCoouunnsseelor Cleveland R Ellis,Director of STOP/Aux. Teacher Staijton oSutLrcaxuusoso ^v /Alosos ' f rPLrXiniiccxippaal /Kar^h J. Buchanan, Principal Enclosure. OVERVIEW The STOP Club (Students That Officially Patrol) is a program that teaches students in the elementary schools about RESPECT and LEADERSHIP! Eighty-five percent of the student body can interview for membership in the club...grades 1-6. v A student will retain Club membership as long as he/she maintains the standards of the club. The goals and objectives of the STOP club are\n1. To enhance students awareness about Respect and Leadership\n2. To increase the self-esteem of the students\n3. To motivate the students to strive to pursue a quality education\n4. To emphasize the importance of a respectful society\n5. To increase parental input in the educational development of their children\n6. To introduce students to positive rolemodels such as: (judges^wyers.doctors,entrepreneurs, contractors, housewives, carpenters, painters, business managers, technicians, chefs, etc.) 7. To guide students in the establishment of a sound value system\n8. To generage a desire to attain excellence in student conduct and achievement\n9. To take pride in themselves and demonstrate self-discipline. All club participants will receive a \"Student That Officially Patrol\" T-shirt. The club members may wear the shirt during the 30 day trial period provided he/she adheres to club rules and regulations. After the 30 day orientation, the students who \"pass the test\" will become officially club members. 10. To help students solve problems among themselves. This includes the ability to report problems to the Principal independently. They are instructed on procedures for maturely handling problems without teacher or playground supervisor's directions. i'M Little Rock School District CSIVEDs November 24, 1993 NOV 2 9 1993 Cfrics or D Air:. . '3 Mrs. Ann Brown Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 E. Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building LittleRock, AR 72201 Dear Mrs. Brown: Thank you for your letter of November 9, 1993. Obviously, I did not use October 1, 1993 enrollment figures in reporting to the Board. Instead, I attempted to give an updated report which I thought included enrollees since October 1. Please be assured that the mformation supplied to your office regarding October 1 enrollment by this District is correct. We will be updating the Board as it relates to enrollment trends at Washington Magnet School. Again, thank you for your assistance. Sincerely yours, Larry S. Robertson cc: Estelle Matthis 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)374-3361Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 November 19, 1993 Mr. Lany S. Robertson Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Larry: At the districts Board of Education meeting last night, 1 heard you and Estelle Matthis answer the boards questions about the number of students attending Washington Magnet and the schools racial balance. The board also asked about the number of Washington M-to-M students and how the schools total 1993-94 enrollment compared to that of the previous year. You told the board that Washingtons enrollment was 765 and its racial distribution was within the desegregation plans racial balance mandate of between 60% and 40%. ODM annually compiles enrollment data based on the October 1 figures reported to the State by the three Pulaski County school districts. The attached chart reflects Washingtons October 1 enrollment data for the last five school years, information which the LRSD furnished ODM. Note that Washingtons 1993-94 enrollment is 721, 101 fewer pupils than the previous year, and that the schools racial balance is 63% black, a proportion that places the school in violation of the desegregation plan. Our records also indicate that 106 M-to-M students presently attend Washington, 69 of them fi-om PCSSD and 37 from NLRSD. We phoned Washington this morning to see if there had been some recent influx of children into the school that would account for the 765 total you reported to the board last night. We were told that the school presently has 722 students enrolled, 63% of whom are black. Because ODM is an arm of the Federal Court, I necessarily place a great deal of emphasis on the accuracy of all information given us by the school districts. If ODMs October 1 enrollment information on Washington is incorrect, please immediately furnish me with the accurate figures. If, however, you agree that our records are correct, I trust you will immediately supply Mrs. Matthis and your Board of Directors with accurate data on Washington so they can make decisions based on sound information. Sincerely yours. in S. Brown Enc. CC: Estelle MatthisFIVE YEAR ENROLLMENT COMPARISON Using October 1 Enrollment Washington Elementary School Washington Elem Black White Other Total % Black 1989-90 510 519 98 1990-91 438 313 11 762 57 1991-92 480 356 841 57 1992-93 483 332 822 59 1993-94 451 260 10 721 63 8 1 5 7 Prepared by ODM based on information supplied by LRSDTEL: Dec 08,93 9:26 No .001 P.03 2) The number of intradistrict tran-sfers to Wash.ington. 1989-90 Sending School Number Male Black Female Male Nonblack Female. Badgect Bale Baseline Brady Chicot Cloverdale Dodd Fair Park Foresc Park Franklin Fulbright Garland Geyer Springs Jefferson Kj ng MabeIvale McDermott Meadowcliff Mitchell Otter Creek Pulaski Heights Rightsell Rockefeller Romine Stephens Terry Wake-field Watson Western Hills Wilson Woodruff 3 4 4 9 9 10 2 9 7 14 16 12 5 14 27 2 10 7 10 7 4 14 23 4 3 8 13 10 3 7 2 2 1 3 6 5 5 3 4 7 6 6 1 9 13 2 4 3 4 1 3 8 10 1 3 1 2 4 5 1 3 2 7 10 6 4 5 14 1 1 1 1 2 TOT2\\L 272 1990-91 Sending School Number 6 8 4 1 3 2 6 4 3 6 1 6 13 4 3 1 5 5 2 4 1 2 1 1 130 131 S 6 Male Black Female Male Nonblack Female Badgett Bale Baseline Brady Chicot Cloverdale Dodd 4 31 5 25 16 20 4 3 1 2 5 2 4 3 1 3 5 3 1 5 2 11 8 8 1 2 1 8 3 3TEL: Dec 08.93 9:27 No.001 P.04 Fair park Forest Park Franklin Fulbright Garland Geyer Springs Jefferson King Mabelvale McDermott Meadowcliff Mitchell Otter Creek Pulaski Heights Rightsell Rockefeller Romine Stephens Terry Wakefield wat.gon Western Hills Wilson Woodruff 14 11 11 35 12 12 21 15 14 29 3 6 7 8 12 22 5 5 22 13 11 7 25 3 2 4 5 7 4 2 7 6 1 2 2 z 2 3 7 6 1 1 3 4 2 1 4 2 1 3 5 9 8 3 6 9 5 2 1 11 1 7 TOTAL 413 98 NOTE: 5 2 8 6 1 4 2 3 3 1 5 13 4 4 1 1 4 3 3 1 7 11 1 6 12 3 112 2 2 2 3 1] 3 4 2 10 119 1 5 1 1 8 84 Information concerning intradistrict transfers is based on We do not have address filci the students' current address. reflecting the students' address at the time of as.gignment.RECB5Vn FEB 7 1QQA Office of Desegregalicn LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Booker T. Washington Magnet School 115 West 27 Street Phone 324-2470 Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 January 29, 1994 Dear community member, I want to take this opportunity to invite you to a very special event. I would like you to join me on Tuesday, February 15, 1994, -for a celebration of excellence. We at Booker T. Washington Basic Skills and Math Science Magnet School are extremely proud of our school and our educational programs. You are an influential member of the greater Little Rock community\nsomeone who is interested and concerned about the needs of our children. Our Washington family believes that we offer wonderful educational opportunities and resources for our students. We would 1 ike you to come to our (\u0026gt; Check Us Out program. Our students, support staff, faculty, and parents welcome you to visit our school between 9:00 a.m. and the beginning of each hour we will provide an 2:00 p.m. At introduction and overview of our programs. Then, we will tour the building visiting classrooms and labs to see how our programs are implemented, for questions and answers, every hour. Finally, we will gather together This format will be repeated Please come II check us out I I welcome you to extend this invitation to other people concerned with local educational opportunities. If you are unable to visit on February 15, don't hesitate to come at some other time or call (324-2470) to schedule a visit. February 15th. I look forward to seeing you on Sincerely,Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor Date: February 2, 1994 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 To: Interdistrict School Principals From: ODM Monitoring Team Subject: Request for documentation On October 26, 1993 we requested that copies of certain documents be available at our scheduled monitoring visit. To date, the following list of items have not been provided. In order to complete our report we ask you send these documents to us no later than Tuesday, February 8, 1994 by 5:00 p.m. Failure to provide copies of these documents by that time will result in a notation in the final report that your school failed to provide monitors with requested documentation. This report will be filed with the federal district court. Crystal Hill 1993-94 PTA total membership by race and gender Total number of conferences each teacher held with parents (by race and gender) during the first semester for the 1993-94 school year. Romine 1993-94 PTA total membership by race and gender Washington Documentation of 1993-94 school committees that includes parent or community representatives by committee name, a brief description of the committees mission, a membership roster (including race, gender^nd position) agenda, and minutes 1993-94 PTA total membership by race and gender 1993-94 school/community partnership agreements 1993-94 volunteer program documentation including the number of volunteers by race and gender and the total number of hours served by month 1993-94 classroom enrollment Discipline Report (first nine weeks) and the definition for SIPSJOHN W. WALKER, P.A. Attorney At Law 1723 Broadway Little Rock. Arkansas 72206 Telephone (501) 374-3758 FAX (501) 374-4187 RECEIVED M4R 1 ' 1994 JOHN W. WALKER RALPH WASHINGTON MARK BURNETTE AUSTIN PORTER. JR. Office of Dosegregation Ktoretcnng March 8, 1994 Mr. Jerry Malone Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Chris Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 2000 First Commercial Bank Bldg. Little Rock, AR 72201 Re\nLRSD V PCSSD Dear Mr. Malone and Mr. Heller: I learned from a meeting this afternoon that the District filed a motion approximately two months ago requesting approval from the court to designate Washington Magnet as an interdistrict school to interdistrict school. satisfy its obligations under the plan for a new My office has no record of receiving a copy of this motion. Would you please provide a copy by return fax. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation. Sincerely, John W. Walker * JWW:j s cc: Honorable Susan Weber Wright Ms. Ann Brown All Counsel of RecordFRIDAY, ELDREDGE fc CLARK HERSCHEL H. ERIOAY, P.A. ROBERT V. LICHT, P.A. WILLIAM H. SUTTON, P.A. JAMES W. MOORE BYRON M. EISEMAN, JR.. P.A. JOE 0. SELL, P.A. JOHN C. ECHOLS. P.A. JAMES A. BUTTRY, P.A. FREDERICK S. URSERY. P.A. H.T. LARZELERE. P.A. OSCAR E. DAVIS, JR.. P.A. JAMES C. CLARK. JR., P.A. THOMAS P. LEGGETT. P.A. JOHN DEWEY WATSON. P.A. PAUL 8. BENHAM ill, P.A. LARRY W. BURKS, P.A. A. WYCKLIFF NISBET, JR., P.A. JAMES EDWARD HARRIS. P.A. .J. PHILLIP MALCOM, P.A. JAMES M. SIMPSON. P.A. MEREDITH P. CATLETT. P.A. JAMES M. SAXTON. P.A. J. SHEPHERD RUSSELL HI. P.A. DONALD H. BACON. P.A. WILLIAM THOMAS BAXTER. P.A. WALTER A. PAULSON II. P.A. BARRY E. COPLIN. P.A. RICHARD 0. TAYLOR. P.A. JOSEPH 8. HURST. JR.. P.A. ELIZABETH J. ROBBEN. P.A. CHRISTOPHER HELLER. P.A. LAURA HENSLEY SMITH, P.A. ROBERT S. SHAFER. P.A. WILLIAM M. GRIFFIN HI. P.A. THOMAS N. ROSE, P.A. MICHAEL 5. MOORE. P.A. DIANE S. MACKEY. P.A. WALTER M. EBEL HI. P.A. A PARTNERSHIP OF INDIVIDUALS AND PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2000 FIRST COMMERCIAL SUILOINO 400 WEST CAPITOL LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-3493 TELEPHONE 5O1-379-2O11 FAX NO. 501-376-2147 March 9, 1994 KEVIN A. CRASS. P.A. WILLIAM A. WADDELL. JR.. P.A. CLYDE TAB* TURNER, P.A. CALVIN J. HALL. P.A. SCOTT J. LANCASTER. P.A. JERRY L. MALONE. P.A. M. GAVLE CORLEY. P.A. ROBERT B. BEACH. JR.. P.A. J. LEE BROWN. P.A. JAMES C. BAKER, JR., P.A. H. CHARLES GSCHWENO, JR.. P A. HARRY A. LIGHT. P.A. SCOTT H. TUCKER. P.A. JOHN CLAYTON RANDOLPH. P.A. GUY ALTON WADE PRICE C. GARDNER J. MICHAEL PICKENS TONIA P. JONES DAVID 0. WILSON JEFFREY H. MOORE ANDREW T. TURNER JOHN RAY WHITE DAVID M. GRAF CARLA G. SPAINHOUR JOHN C. FENOLEY. JR. ALLISON GRAVES 8AZZEL R. CHRISTOPHER LAWSON GREGORY 0. TAYLOR TONY L. WILCOX FRAN C. HICKMAN COUNSEL WILLIAM J. SMITH WILLIAM A. ELDREDGE, JR.. P.A. B .3. CLARK WILLIAM L. TERRY WILLIAM L. PATTON, JR.. P.A. WRITER'S DIRECT NO. Mr. John Walker JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Re: LRSD V. PCSSD Dear John: Several weeks ago, RECEIVED MAR 1 1 1994 Office of Desegregation fkniioring (501) 370-1506 I circulated to counsel a proposal to recognize Washington as a second interdistrict schol within LRSD. You responded that you opposed the proposal. Although we intend to pursue the issue, no motion has yet been filed. has changed, please let me know, advised of any developments. If your position Otherwise, we will keep you Yours very truly. Christopher Heller CJH/k cc: All Counsel Ms. Mr. Ann Brown Jerry Malone .v/ p/oa Ci'iiGS 01 2 2 1994 it Desegregates'' r- IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS72? WESTERN DIVISION ' 2 G 1594 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JAMES W. By:_____ ft' 'PLKINTIFF SRK V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS MOTION FOR MODIFICATION OF DESEGREGATION PLAN For its motion, plaintiff. Little Rock School District (LRSD) states: 1. The LRSD and Interdistrict Desegregation Plans require the establishment within LRSD of three interdistrict schools Romine, King and Stephens. The plans require that two of those schools. King and Stephens, be located in the downtown Little Rock area. Romine and King schools have been established as interdistrict schools. 2. Since the parties agreed that LRSD would establish the King and Stephens Interdistrict Schools in the downtown Little Rock area. there have been significant changes in factual conditions which warrant modification of that agreement. First, Washington Elementary School, which the parties agreed would be an incentive school, presently operates as an interdistrict school in the downtown Little Rock area. Second, there has been a significant movement of population out of the area in which the parties planned Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 May 5, 1994 To Whom It May Concern: If youre considering Stan Strauss for a position in your organization, youre looking at a strong candidate. While Stans resume will acquaint you with his solid background and experience, it will not tell you about the many professional and personal qualities that make Stan such a successful educational leader. Ive worked with Stan for many years (both in my position as a Little Rock School District supervisor and in Court-appointed roles in desegregation oversight) and want you to know why I have consistently been impressed with his abilities and performance. Stan is a man of ideas and action who insists on results. Although hes energetic and rolls up his sleeves to put in as many hours as it takes to get the job done, Stan doesnt mistake effort for outcome. Hes satisfied with nothing less than solid performance-in himself, his staff, and his students. Hes not just a hard worker, hes a smart worker, making excellent, creative use of resources, always looking for \"how we can,\" never \"why we cant.\" Hes a team-builder with vision and courage and a team-sustainer with grit and tenacity, understanding that the best leaders work through and with others to build shared success. Stan has many fine qualities, but I most cherish that aspect of him which I believe is critical to effective education: never-wavering devotion to children. Stan loves kids and it shows. He combines nurturing warmth with strong guidance and encouragement in proportions that are just right for youngsters. No wonder standardized test scores have improved noticeably at both of the schools hes led! Stan wants results and he knows how to get them. If youre looking for a status quo, get-by kind of a man, you wont be interested in Stan. But if you want a champion for children and their success, if you need a leader who knows how to make a difference, then dont let Stan Strauss get away. Sincerely yours, Ann S. Brown receded RLE ly I APR 2 2 W54 U.G, Dli :ICT CgU, Oiiics Ct Desegregation Monitorinfl EASTcRU D\nG7r,iGTA-'? IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAftq 2 G WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JAMES W. McCC' Ey\n___________ ClER r\\ I\u0026gt;ISINTIFF V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR MODIFICATION OF DESEGREGATION PLAN Introduction This brief traces some of the history of the development of the present LRSD and Interdistrict desegregation plans in support of the argument that the parties intended, and now have in place. three interdistrict schools within the Little Rock School District. Some of the documents which were submitted by the parties to Special Master Aubrey McCutcheon do not appear on the docket. For the convenience of the Court and the parties. documents are referred to throughout this brief by their location in the Joint Designated Record which was used for the 1989 and 1990 appeals and subsequently by the district court. Those documents not contained in the Joint Designated Record are referenced by date and docket number.statement of the Case A. Desegregation Plans Aubrey McCutcheon filed his \"Interim Report and Recommendations of the Special Master\" on Febxruary 16, 1988. J.D.R. 714. Special Master McCutcheon approved and recommended for immediate adoption certain \"Proposed Stipulations For Little Rock School District Desegregation Plan\" which had been agreed upon by the parties to this case. The Stipulations contained an interim plan as well as a planning process which was to result in a final plan to be submitted to the Special Master by September 30, 1988. The Little Rock School District submitted its proposed desegregation plan on October 3, 1988. 5 J.D.R. 1040. The October 4 3, 1988 Proposed LRSD Desegregation Plan contained the following language about Washington school\n\"The new Washington will function as an interdistrict magnet school. A tri-district survey will be conducted in October 1988 to determine a theme. The Washington students who were temporarily reassigned for the 1988-89 school years will be assigned to the new Washington school. Washington's location is expected to be a major asset to its ability to attract white students. In particular, it is easily accessible to downtown office workers from both North Little Rock, Pulaski County and Southwest Little Rock. Also, Washington's proximity to 1-30 is expected to attract students who live outside of 2Pulaski County. The Little Rock School District is interested in opening the magnet and M-M programs to students who live outside of Pulaski County.\" 5 J.D.R. 1045-46. The October 1988 plan also recommended Stephens as an interdistrict magnet: \"The recommendations in this section are based on current demographics and geography which identify a need for new construction. It is proposed that the District relocate Stephens Elementary due west of and adjoining the Capitol Hill Complex. The new Stephens will house pre-kindergarten through sixth grades. The new Stephens will be similar to the new Washington in that it will have a capacity of six hundred students and serve as an interdistrict magnet. The magnet theme will be based on the results of the tri-district survey. In addition to being located on the 1-630 corridor, the new Stephens will be easily accessible to downtown office workers, state department employees and University Medical Center personnel.\" 5 J.D.R. 1047-48 (emphasis supplied). The third interdistrict magnet school proposed in the October 1988 plan was King: \"The Little Rock School District also proposes to build a new King Elementary School in downtown Little Rock. The facility would be located in the general area bounded by 1-630, Chester Street, Seventh Street and Center Street. In addition to being an interdistrict 3magnet, the big attraction for this school will be its early childhood program and child care facilities. This location is expected to serve as a natural magnet for individuals who work within governmental and business centers of Little Rock.\" 5 J.D.R. 1048. Working with the parties and the Special Master, LRSD prepared a long term desegregation plan. The plan was submitted in two parts on January 31, 1989. Volume I does not address student assignment issues. Volxime II, which was modified slightly and resubmitted on March 23, 1989, describes \"student assignments\" and \"facilities\". An interdistrict desegregation plan was submitted to the Special Master on February 15, 1989. The March 1989 LRSD plan lists Washington among the incentive schools (10 J.D.R. 2288) and provides the following description of Washington school (10 J.D.R. 2231-33): \"Washington school is closed for the 1988-89 school year. A new Washington school is being built at the samp site with a projected capacity of 1,050 students. The students who were originally assigned to Washington for the 1988-89 school year have been reassigned to Ish, Mitchell, Rockefeller and Rightsell. These students (166) will have a preference to return to the new Washington in the 1989-90 school year.\" The March 1989 LRSD plan contains the following language about Stephens and King schools: 4\"It is proposed that the District relocate Stephens Elementary near the 1-630 corridor between 1-30 and University Avenue. The new Stephens will house prekindergarten through sixth grades and will have a capacity of 600 students. It serves as an Interdistrict school. The new Stephens will be easily accessible to downtown office workers, state department employees and University Medical Center persoimel. The Little Rock School District also proposes to build a new King Elementary School in downtown Little Rock. The facility would be located in the general area along 1-630 between 1-30 and University Avenue. In addition to being an Interdistrict school, an attraction for this school will be its Early Childhood Program and childcare facilities. This location is expected to serve as a natural magnet for individuals who work within governmental and business centers of Little Rock. 10 J.D.R. 3232. According to the March 1989 plan, the non-magnet enrollment in LRSD for the 1988-89 school year was 8,327 black students and 3,835 non-black students for a total of 12,162 students. The projected enrollment for the 1989-90 school year was 8,500 black students and 3,850 non-black students for a total of 12,350 students. 10 J.D.R. 2229. The March 1989 plan listed 22 elementary schools with a total capacity of 9,501 seats and a projected enrollment of 8,187 students. 10 J.D.R. 2227-28. The eight incentive schools. 5including 1050 seats at Washington, would have a total capacity of 3800 seats. 10 J.D.R. 2228. Romine was to be established as an interdistrict school for the 1989-90 school year with a capacity of 490 seats, up to 49% of which would be allocated to PCSSD and at least 51% of which would be allocated to LRSD. 10 J.D.R. 2229. The February 1989 Interdistrict Desegregation Plan lists Washington as an incentive school (8 J.D.R. 1722), proposes the conversion of Romine into an interdistrict school (8 J.D.R. 1731- 32), and reguires LRSD to construct two new interdistrict schools. King and Stephens. Stephens is described as follows in the February 1989 Interdistrict Plan\n\"LRSD will build new Stephens Elementary School operating at grades pre-K through 6 to be located near the 1-630 corridor between 1-30 and University Avenue. This school will be ready by the 1990-91 school year or as soon as reasonably practicable. These parties propose that this elementary center be constructed, owned, and operated by the LRSD and draw its black student body largely from the students then attending the old Stephens school and its white student population, to the extent feasible, from both dependents of state government employees and PCSSD students. This school will have an a early childhood program. The old Stephens school building will then be closed.\" 8 J.D.R. 1732. The February 1989 Interdistrict Plan contains the following language about King school: 6 )MkoADna|*n.Bri\"LRSD will construct a new King Elementary School as a downtown Interdistrict School by the 1992-93 school year or as soon as reasonably practicable. These parties propose that this facility be located in the general area bounded by Interdistrict 630 between 1-30 and University Avenue. These parties believe that this location would serve as a natural attractor for individuals who work within the governmental and business centers of Little Rock.\" 8 J.D.R. 1734. The 1989 LRSD and Interdistrict Plans were among the plans the Special Master recommended for rejection on May 10, 1989 (Docket #1182). The district court accepted the Special Master's recommendation and rejected the 1989 desegregation plans on June 27, 1989 (Docket #1200). All three school districts and the Joshua Intervenors appealed from the June 27, 1989 order. Following the June 27, 1989 order of the district court. metropolitan supervisor Eugene Reville relocated to Little Rock and commenced the task of preparing new desegregation recommendations for the three districts. On January 2, 1990 Mr. Reville filed his proposal, the \"Tri-District Plan\", with the district court. Docket #1291. Under the Tri-District Plan, Washington became an interdistrict magnet school for basic skills/math/science which was described as follows: \"This school will open in 1990-91 for students who learn well in a highly-structured setting\nwho are motivated by 7academic, physical, and social competition\nand who are Interested in math and science.\" 16 J.D.R. 4329. The Tri-District Plan contains the following language regarding assignments to Washington: \"Assignment to Washington will be open to students from the Pulaski County Special School District or the North Little Rock School District based on majority-to- minority provisions and on the provisions of Act 609 of 1989 (the \"School Choice\" law). Preference will be given to black students in the Little Rock School District who live in the attendance zone for Washington School and to white students in the Pulaski County Special School District. Next preference will be given to students who attend schools that are less than fifty-six percent black.\" 16 J.D.R. 4250. The Tri-District Plan does not require the construction of a new Stephens or King Interdistrict School. On March 5, 1990 (Docket #1328) the district court entered an order approving the Tri-District Plan as submitted on January 2, 1990 with only minor exceptions. Washington Elementary School was closed and rebuilt on the same site during the 1988-89 school year. The new Washington school opened for the 1989-90 school year as racially a identifiable elementary school with 519 students, ninety-eight percent of whom were black. During the pendency of the appeals of the district court's order rejecting the settlement plans and 8 ladQ'\\bMg-n.Briapproving the Tri-District Plan, the Tri-District Plan was implemented for the 1990-91 school year. Washington operated during the 1990-91 school year as a racially balanced interdistrict magnet school. Fifty-seven percent of Washington's 762 students were black. One hundred thirty-two white students from outside LRSD attended Washington Interdistrict Magnet School during the 1990-91 school year. The desegregation plans presented to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in the joint appeal of the three school districts and the Joshua Intervenors required only three interdistrict schools within the Little Rock School District - King, Romine and Stephens. On December 12, 1990, the Court of Appeals approved those desegregation plans but recognized that a transition from the Tri- District Plan to the settlement plans would be necessary: \"It may be necessary. in order to make smooth a transition, for the details of the settlement plans to be adjusted to produce an appropriate fit between their future application and existing circumstances. The parties should be able to agree as to whether any such adjustments are necessary, and, if so, what they should be. Absent such agreement, the district court is authorized to take such action as may be just.\" LRSD V. PCSSD. 921 F.2d 1371, 1394 (Sth Cir. 1990). Since certain existing schools, including Washington, were assigned different purposes under the Tri-District Plan than under the settlement plans, it became necessary for the parties to immediately resolve k\u0026gt;thy\\Dwt.pl.Bri 9those differences. The parties reached the following agreement concerning Washington School: \"Washington School was a racially identifiable black school during the 1989-90 school year. Washington opened for the 1990-91 school year as a racially balanced (57% black) magnet school. Washington should continue to operate as a magnet school.\" This agreement is recorded in a stipulation and consent order signed by all the parties and entered by the district court on February 13, 1991 (Docket #1434). On May 1, 1991, the parties jointly proposed certain revisions to their 1989 desegregation plans. Washington was removed from the list of incentive schools in the May 1, 1991 LRSD plan. 22 J.D.R. 5723, 5726, 5729. Although Washington is not listed as an interdistrict school in the May 1, 1991 interdistrict plan (see 22 J.D.R. 5864-70), the May 1991 LRSD plan describes the goals of the Washington Elementary School Basic Skills/Math - Science Magnet and explains how students will be assigned there: \"All students will be assigned to Washington Schools (sic) by the Student Assignment Office. The NLRSD and PCSSD will actively recruit students who are eligible for M-to-M transfers. The target racial balance at Washington will be 60 percent black and 40 percent white.\" 22 J.D.R. 5698. 10This coxirt's final ruling on the May 1, 1991 desegregation plans was filed on May 1, 1992, approving \"the revised plans as attached to\" the May 1, 1992 order. Those are the plans under which the districts presently operate. The LRSD plan contains the following language concerning assignments to Washington Elementary School Basic Skills/Math - Science Magnet\n\"All students will be assigned to Washington Schools (sic) by the Student Assignment Office. The NLRSD and PCSSD will actively recruit students who are eligible for M-to-M transfers. The target racial balance at Washington will be consistent with the Interdistrict Plan, seeking to obtain a ratio of between 60 percent and 40 percent of either race with the ideal goal to be 50 percent black/white.\" LRSD Desegregation Plan, April 29, 1992, p. 144. The difference between the racial composition proposed by the parties in the May 1, 1991 plan (60% black and 40% white) and the racial balance contained in the plan as approved by the district court dated April 29, 1992 (between 60% and 40% of either race with the ideal goal to be 50% black/white) is significant. The racial balance prescribed for Washington by this Court is the racial balance for interdistrict schools found in the Interdistrict Desegregation Plan and described in this Court's May 1, 1992 Order: \"Provisions of the interdistrict plan target the ideal racial balance for the various types of LRSD schools: Interdistrict schools at 50 percent black/white with a variance of 60 to 40 percent of either race ... H kBllqr\\DMeg*^Bri 11May 1, 1992 Order (Docket #1587), pp. 27-28. This Court would not have assigned to Washington the racial balance requirements of interdistrict schools if Washington were not, in fact, operating as an interdistrict school. The decision that Washington should be governed by the racial balance requirements for interdistrict schools set forth in the Interdistrict Plan reflects this Court's recognition of Washington as an interdistrist school. The 1989 desegregation plans approved by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals require the operation of three Interdistrict schools within LRSD - Romine, King and Stephens. 10 J.D.R. 2229- 32\nJ.D.R. 1721, 1731-34. LRSD presently operates three interdistrict schools - Romine, King and Washington. The LRSD and Interdistrict Desegregation Plans should be amended to reflect the fact that LRSD presently operates the number of interdistrict schools contemplated by the plans agreed upon by the parties in 1989 and approved by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in 1990. In its order with respect to the modifications proposed by the parties in the May 1991 plans, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals said: \"It may be helpful for us to state those elements of the 1989 plan that we consider crucial, and with respect no retreat should be approved. They are as follows: (3) operation of the agreed number of interdistrict schools according to the agreed timetable ... II Appeal of Little Rock School District. 949 F.2d 253, 256 (8th Cir. 1991). In accordance with the 1989 plans approved by the Court of 12 8Appeals in December 1990 and the order quoted above, LRSD presently operates three interdistrict schools. B. Demographics According to the LRSD and Interdistrict Desegregation Plans as those plans were approved by the Court of Appeals in 1990, LRSD was to establish three interdistrict schools, two of which would be located in central Little Rock in the general area along 1-630 between University Avenue and 1-30. One school was to be established \"near the 1-630 corridor between 1-30 and University Avenue.\" 10 J.D.R. 3232. The other was supposed to be \"located in the general area along 1-630 between 1-30 and University Avenue.\" 10 J.D.R. 3232. Since those plans were written, both King and Washington schools have been established as interdistrict schools within the area described in the plans. Also since those plans were written, 1990 census information has revealed a dramatic shift of population away from the area in which the interdistrict schools were to be located. This decline in population in the area targeted for the location of interdistrict schools is illustrated by undisputed evidence which was presented to the district court concerning the issue of revised election zones for the LRSD board. When the initial LRSD board member election zones were approved by Judge Woods on December 18, 1986 (Docket # 719), zones one and two had total populations of 25,399 and 25,295 respectively. Zones one and two cover most of central and east Little Rock, which is the 13 ladQADMegPl.Briprimary area in which LRSD interdistrict schools were to be located. According to the 1990 census information, the population of zone one is 20,901, which is 4,498 people lower than the previous census. The 1990 population of zone two was 20,415, which is 4,880 people lower than the previous census. The 1990 census shows an eighteen percent decline of the number of people in zone one and a nineteen percent decline of the number of people in zone two. The movement of population away from east and central Little Rock is further shown in the testimony of Jim McKenzie about the election zone issue. Mr. McKenzie is the executive director of Metroplan, governmental planning and research organization composed of local government entities in the Central Arkansas area. Mr. McKenzie testified that his organization tracks demographic changes in Little Rock and that there was a material demographic change from the 1980 census to the 1990 census. April 13, 1993, Tr. 62-63. Although the population in eastern Little Rock a declined each year since 1980 (Tr. 67) , most of the movement out of that area occurred between 1985 and 1990. Tr. 62-63. Mr. McKenzie testified that the \"center city\" will continue to lose population. Tr. 100-01. Mr. McKenzie prepared four proposals to adjust the LRSD election zones so that they would contain relatively equal populations. He testified that his proposal number four \"looks more to the future in terms of growth and shifts in population than the other proposals.\" See Memorandum Opinion and Order, June 21, k*d9\\OM\u0026lt;-n.Bri 141993 (Docket /1853), p. 5. According to Mr. McKenzie's description of proposal number four, \"the areas of the City of Little Rock that are projected for growth have a negative variance from the mean while the areas that are projected to lose population have a positive variance\". Id. In proposal number four, which was presented to the court in PCBE Exhibit 1, the only two zones which show a positive variance from the mean, indicating a projected loss of population, are zones one and two. See Tr. 101-02. The movement of population away from the area targeted for the establishment of interdistrict schools within LRSD is also shown in information provided to the parties by the Office of Desegregation Monitoring. A document titled \"Incentive School Attendance Zones and Schools Attended\" shows a total population of the incentive school attendance zones (Franklin, Garland, Mitchell, Rightsell, Rockefeller and Stephens) of 1,946 for the 1993-94 school year. The incentive school attendance zones generally correspond with the area targeted for the location of interdistrict schools. In fact, the interdistrict schools were expected to draw their black student population from among \"those students who otherwise would or could have been assigned to an Incentive School\". J.D.R. 1722. The present number of students in the incentive school zones (1,946) is dramatically lower than the capacity established for the incentive schools in the 1989 desegregation plans of 3800 students. 10 J.D.R. 2228. The parties projected in the 1989 LRSD 8 Desegregation Plan that if 3600 LRSD black students attended 15incentive and interdistrict schools, the racial composition of the area schools would be 56% black. 10 J.D.R. 2231. According to the 1989 Interdistrict Desegregation Plan, the incentive schools alone should be \"sufficient to accommodate that number of black students who, by attending these schools, make it possible to achieve a student population in the remaining Little Rock schools (elementary academies) [now area schools] of 55% black and 45% white with a variance of 5%.\" 8 J.D.R. 1721. That means that in 1989 the parties expected that more than 3600 black students would attend the incentive schools from the incentive school zones, but today only 1,946 students reside in the incentive school zones. The Office of Desegregation Monitoring prepared and distributed to the parties in February 1994 a study of \"Enrollment In Downtown Elementary Schools\". That study defines downtown elementary schools as those located \"east of University, west of Adams Field, north of Fourche Creek, and south of Markham.\" This is generally the area targeted for the location of LRSD interdistrict schools. This study shows that the incentive schools have a capacity of 2,305 students but that the October 1, 1993 enrollment was only 1,454 students. There are 1,429 available seats in downtown elementary schools. Those schools operate at only seventy-six percent of capacity. The February 1994 ODM study also shows that the two existing downtown interdistrict schools. King and Washington, are operating at 80% and 77% of capacity, respectively. There are 139 available seats at King and 218 available seats at Washington. King 16Interdistrict School has attracted 200 white students from outside the downtown area and Washington Interdistrict Magnet School has attracted 249 white students from outside the downtown area. Finally, both the Pulaski County Special School District, which was to be the primary source of white students for the interdistrict schools (8 J.D.R. 1721), and the Little Rock School District have experienced an unexpected overall decline in student population. The number of students attending PCSSD declined from 21,633 for the 1992-93 school year to 20,426 for the 1993-94 school year according to the October 1 enrollment count, a loss of 1,207 students. The number of students attending LRSD declined from 26,212 for the 1992-93 school year to 25,594 for the 1993-94 school year, a loss of 618 students. Both districts expect to lose more students for the 1994-95 school year. C. Plan Modification Process The PCSSD plan contains a desegregation plan amendment process (pp. 104-05) which this Court has found should be implied in the LRSD and NLRSD plans (Memorandum and Order, June 21, 1991, p. 17, Docket #1479). This Court has described the plan modification process as follows: \"Proposed amendments may arise in multiple ways. including by agreement or consultation with the other parties. Any proposal is first submitted to the PCSSD Office of Desegregation (Office) for initial review and analysis. The Office will make a recommendation to the kMfay\\DBHgn.Bti 17superintendent who will in turn make the final recommendation to the Board. If the Board approves, the matter will be submitted to the Court, and formally submitted to the other parties to the litigation. If the Court approves, the plan shall be amended. Note that bv the Plans own terms, agreement of all parties is not required for amendment.\" X^. (emphasis in original). LRSD has followed the desegregation plan amendment process with respect to its proposal to recognize Washington as an interdistrict school in place of Stephens. The proposal was first reviewed by the LRSD Desegregation Office as well as other administrators and the superintendent. Following that review. LRSD informally submitted the proposal to the other parties on November 12, 1993. LRSD proposed: \"That we seek to amend the desegregation plan to acknowledge the fact that both Washington and King have been established as interdistrict schools and that the establishment of two such schools within LRSD satisfies the Eighth Circuit's requirement that LRSD operate 'the agreed number of interdistrict schools'. PCSSD would be expected to 'engage in early, rigorous and sustained recruitment efforts' to recruit students to Washington, but would be relieved of the expectation that the white student population of Washington would come primarily from PCSSD. White LRSD students presently attending Washington would be allowed to remain and LRSD would kM^\\Dna(-n.Bri 18continue to recruit white students for Washington in the future.* Letter to Counsel, November 12, 1993. LRSD further proposed: \"That we delay the construction of a school at the present Stephens site so that LRSD may complete its demographic study to determine how best to meet the requirements of its student population and the desegregation plans. If LRSD determines to build a new school at the Stephens School Site, the new school will be an incentive school and the parties will support LRSD's motion to construct an incentive school at Stephens or in the Stephens area.\" Id. LRSD was notified by counsel for PCSSD, NLRSD and the Knight Inteirvenors that those parties would agree to the Stephens/Washington proposal. LRSD was notified by counsel for the Joshua Intervenors that Joshua would likely agree to some delay in the construction of a school at the present Stephens site, but would not agree that Washington should supplant Stephens as an interdistrict school within LRSD. On November 17, 1993, LRSD counsel provided a written report to the superintendent and the board concerning the status of the Stephens/Washington issue and the response of the parties to LRSD proposal. The LRSD board voted on November 18, 1993, in accordance with the superintendent's recommendation, to submit the matter to the Court with formal notification to the other parties. laUQrMlMet'Pl'Bri 19D. Financial Constraints LRSD operates under financial constraints which are well known to the Court and the parties. LRSD filed on April 15, 1994 its \"LRSD 1994-95 Budget Status Report\", which shows a projected budget deficit for the 1994-95 school year of more than seven million dollars. LRSD is working to balance its budget, but continues to operate with severe financial limitations. The Office of Desegregation Monitoring provided the parties in February 1994 a document titled \"LRSD Per Pupil Expenditure By Elementary School 1993-1994 Budget\". This report shows the impact of low enrollment on per pupil expenditures in the area targeted for the location of interdistrict schools. The average per pupil expenditure in \"western\" Little Rock elmentary schools is $2,526.35. The average per pupil expenditure in \"southwestern\" Little Rock schools is $2,638.91. The average per pupil expenditure for incentive schools is $5,890.36. No school in LRSD, however, has a higher per pupil expenditure than Stephens school. The amount budgeted for each student at Stephens for the 1993-94 school year is $8,781.19. This is nearly $3,000.00 per pupil more than the average amount ($5,890.36) budgeted per pupil at the incentive schools. This illustrates the financial impact of declining population and enrollment in the Stephens area. Argument A. The Law of Modification of Consent Decrees Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides in relevant part: blby\\Dnat-n.Bri 20\"On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or a party's legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: ... (5) the judgment has been satisfied. released, or discharged, or a prior judgment upon which it is based has been reversed or otherwise vacated, or it is no longer equitable that the judgment should have prospective application\nor (6) any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment.\" The United States Supreme Court has addressed the application of Rule 60(b) to institutional reform litigation such as a school desegregation case. In Rufo V. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail. 502 U.S. 116 L.Ed. 2d 867 (1992), the Supreme Court held that Rule 60(b) is applicable to cases in which a consent decree has been entered. Id. at 116 L.Ed.2d 883. In a school desegregation case. the Supreme Court rejected the rigid standard for modification of a consent decree set forth in United States V. Swift \u0026amp; Co.. 286 U.S. 106, 119 (1932) (\"nothing less than a clear showing of grievous wrong evoked by new and unforeseen conditions should lead us to change what was decreed after years of litigation with the consent of all concerned\") in favor of a more flexible standard. Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Dowell. 498 U.S. , 112 L.Ed. 2d 715 (1991). As the Court said in Rufo, Rule 60(b), \"in providing that, on such terms as are just, a party may be relieved from a final judgment or decree where it is no longer equitable kathy\\Dne|-Pl.Bri 21that the judgment have prospective application, permits a less stringent, more flexible standard.\" Buis, 116 L.Ed. 2d at 884. \"The upsurge in institutional reform litigation since Brown v. Board of Education has made the ability of a district court to modify a decree in response to changed circumstances all the more important\". Rufo, 116 L.Ed. 2d at 884. The Rufo Court observed that \"[t]he experience of the District and Circuit Courts in implementing and modifying such decrees has demonstrated that a flexible approach is often essential to achieving the goals of reform litigation\". Id. The Rufo Court also approved the observation of several Courts of Appeal \"that the public interest is a particularly significant reason for applying a flexible modification standard in institutional reform litigation because such decrees \"reach beyond the parties involved directly in the suit and impact on the public's right to the sound and efficient operation of its institutions\". Id. at 885, quoting Heath v. DeCourcv. 888 F. 2d 1105, 1109 (6th Cir. 1989). A party seeking modification of a consent decree bears the burden of establishing that a significant change in circumstances warrants revision of the decree. Id. at 886. The party seeking modification may meet its initial burden by showing either a significant change in factual conditions or in law. If the moving party meets this burden, the court must consider whether the proposed modification is suitably tailored to the changed circumstance. 22The Supreme Court in Rufo provided several examples of situations where modification of a consent decree may be warranted: 1. \"When changed factual conditions make compliance with the decree substantially more onerous.\" Id. at 886. 2. \"When a decree proves to be unworkable because of unforeseen obstacles\", citing particularly relevant case, Philadelphia a Welfare Rights Organization v. Shapp. 602 F.2d at 1120-1121 (modification allowed where State could not find sufficient clients to meet decree targets). Id. at 886. 3. \"When enforcement of the decree without modification would be detrimental to the public interest.\" Id. at 886-87. Once a moving party has met its burden of establishing either a change in fact or in law warranting modification of a consent decree, the district court should apply the following test to determine whether the proposed modification is suitably tailored to the changed circumstance: (1) \"A modification must not create or perpetuate a constitutional violation ... tl hBilQr\\DMe(*Pl.Bri 23(2) \"A proposed modification should not strive to rewrite a consent decree so that it conforms to the constitutional floor ... (3) \"A court should not allow a change greater than that necessary 'to resolve the problems created by the change in circximstances' . Id. at 890-91. within these boundaries, the Court should defer to LRSD: Within these constraints, the public interest and \"\nand n \"[c]onsiderations based on the allocation of powers within our federal system\" Dowell, 498 US, at ___, 112 L Ed 2d 715, 111 S Ct 630, require that the district court defer to local government administrators, who have the \"primary responsibility for elucidating, assessing, and solving\" the problems of institutional reform, to resolve the intricacies of implementing a decree modification. Brown v. Board of Education, 349 US, at 299, 99 L Ed 2d 1083, 75 S Ct 2749. Id. at 891. Finally, although \"[f]inancial constraints may not be used to justify the creation or perpetuation of constitutional violations\", \"they are legitimate concern of government a defendants in institutional reform litigation and therefore are appropriately considered in tailoring consent decree a modification.\" Id. at 891-92. 24The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has described in this case 'the standard to be used by the District Court for reviewing proposed modifications to the plan ... to which all the parties have not agreed\". Appeal of Little Rock School District. 949 F.2d 253, 258 (Sth Cir. 1991). The Eighth Circuit, in a decision which came after Dowell but before gufo, adopted the following standard set forth in Heath v. DeCourcv. 88 F.2d 1105 (6th Cir. 1989)\n\"To modify [a] consent decree [], the court need only identify a defect or deficiency in its original decree which impedes achieving its goal. either because experience has proven it less effective [or] disadvantageous, or because circumstances and conditions have changed which warrant fine-tuning the decree. modification will be upheld if it furthers the original purpose of the decree in a more efficient way, without upsetting the basic agreement between the parties.\" Id. at 1110. The standard adopted by the Eighth Circuit in Appeal of Little Rock School District is in harmony with the later decision of the Supreme Court in Rufo. See Lorain NAACP v. Lorain Bd. of Educ. . 979 F.2d 1141, 1149 (6th Cir. 1992) (treating the Rufo and Heath standards as harmonious and holding that school descregation consent decrees \"are subject to the same standards as annunciated in Rufo and Heath.\") The Eighth Circuit advised the district court to \"proceed with that discretion and flexibility that characterizes courts of equity\" and noted that district court decisions with respect to 25 Aplan modifications will be reviewed on an abuse-of-discretion basis with \"a healthy measure of deference to the reasoned choices made by the District Court.\" Appeal of Little Rock School District. 949 F.2d 253, 257 (Sth Cir. 1991). The Eighth Circuit's deferential standard of review concerning contested proposed modifications of consent decrees is also described in McDonald v. Armentrout. F.2d 388 (8th Cir. 1990)\n908 \"The district court retains authority over the consent decree, including the power to modify the decree in light of changed circumstances, and is subject to only a limited check by the reviewing court. We will reverse a district court's modification of a consent decree only upon a showing of an abuse of discretion. Moreover, the Supreme Court has indicated that a district court's resolution of a motion to modify is due greater deference when the changed circumstances justifying modification are of fact rather than law.\" 908 F.2d at 390 (citations omitted). B. Changed Circumstances There have been two important changes in the factual circumstances of this case since the agreement of the parties in 1989, approved by the Court of Appeals in 1990, that three interdistrict schools would be established within LRSD. First, by operation of the Tri-District Plan, Washington was established and continues to serve as an interdistrict magnet school. With the 26 bi^ntwt FLBriopening of King for the 1993-94 school year, LRSD has established three interdistrict schools. Washington and King are located within the area targeted for location of Stephens and King interdistrict schools in the 1989 LRSD and Interdistrict Plans. Second, the 1990 census and the 1993-94 enrollment numbers show that the area targeted for location of interdistrict schools within LRSD is an area of rapidly declining population. that many elementary school seats are presently available within that area. and that LRSD and PCSSD are beginning to experience an overall decline in student population. These changes warrant modification of the LRSD and Interdistrict Plans to recognize Washington as an interdistrict school in place of Stephens. C. Washington Interdistrict Magnet School The parties have been consistent in their agreement that three interdistrict schools should be established within the Little Rock School District. According to the October 3, 1988 proposed LRSD Desegregation Plan, those three schools would be Stephens, King and Washington. 5 J.D.R. 1045-48. The parties' 1988 agreement to recommend construction of new Stephens and King Interdistrict Schools was \"based on [then] current demographics and geography which identif[ied] a need for new construction.\" 5 J.D.R. 1047. Between the time the parties submitted the October 3, 1988 proposed LRSD Desegregation Plan and the time they agreed upon peirmanent desegregation plans in March of 1989, Romine was substituted for Washington as the third LRSD interdistrict school. There are two reasons for this. First, there was a perceived need laifaBr\\Deae(\u0026gt;P).Bri 27for at least 3,600 incentive school seats which could not be realized without designating Washington as an incentive school. 10 J.D.R. 2228, 2231. Second, when the attendance zones for \"elementary academies\" were drawn in accordance with the 1989 Interdistrict Plan (8 J.D.R. 1721), the target population of \"55% black and 45% white with a variance of 5%\" could not be achieved in the Romine area. The parties therefore substituted Romine for Washington as an interdistrict school and designated Washington as an incentive school. The circumstances changed on March 5, 1990 when the district court entered an order approving the Tri-District Plan. Under that plan, with the parties subsequent acquiescence (Docket /1434), Washington was established at the beginning of the 1990-91 school year as an interdistrict school and continues to operate interdistrict school. as an Because LRSD now has in place the number of interdistrict schools the parties agreed upon in the 1989 Desegregation Settlement, the number of interdistrict schools approved by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals on December 12, 1990 and the number of interdistrict schools considered \" crucial\" by the Eighth Circuit on November 14, 1991, \"it is no longer equitable\" to require the construction of a new Stephens Interdistrict School. Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)\nRufo, 116 L.Ed.2d at 884. D. Demographics 28The significant outflow of population from the area targeted for LRSD interdistrict schools and the great number of elementary seats available in that area, and particularly at King and Washington Interdistrict Schools, constitute significant changes in circumstances which warrant revision of the LRSD and Interdistrict Desegregation Plans. This demographic change, combined with the change which resulted in the establishment of Washington as an interdistrict school, clearly meets the Rufo and Eighth Circuit standards for modification of a consent decree. Modification of a consent decree is \"appropriate when a decree proves to be unworkable because of unforeseen obstacles.\" Rufo. 116 L.Ed.2d at 886. The decline in population of the area targeted for the location of LRSD incentive schools and its impact upon enrollment in schools in central and east Little Rock was not foreseen by the parties. In 1988, the parties believed that \"current demographics\" showed \"a need for new construction\". J.D.R. 1047-48. In 1994, the two newest elementary schools in the LRSD system are King and Washington Interdistrict Schools. Those schools have a total of 357 seats available in them. There are 1,429 available seats in downtown Little Rock, which is the general area in which the desegregation plans presently require the 5 Stephens school to be located. The 1990 census and recent LRSD and PCSSD enrollment data show that there is no longer a need for new construction which would justify the building of new a interdistrict school. 29In a case cited with approval in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals allowed modification of consent decree in a circumstances similar to those in this case even under the stricter pre-Rufo standard. Philadelphia Welfare Rights Organization v. Shape, 602 F.2d 1114 (3rd Cir. 1979). In Shapp. a consent decree required the State of Pennsylvania to perfonn a certain number of medical screenings per year for welfare recipients. Id. at 1118. Due to declining welfare roles, however, the total population eligible for screening \"was significantly lower than had been expected at the time of the consent decree\". Id. The court noted that \"[a]ny injunction imposing mandatory affirmative duties for the future involves elements of prediction ... [which] will always be speculative to some degree\" and that \"[t]his is particularly the case when the defendants' ability to achieve compliance depends upon the receptivity of class members or other third parties not formally before the court.\" Id. at 1120. The declining population and enrollment in this case present changed circumstances equivalent to declining welfare rolls in Shapp. As in Shapp. the requested modification of the decree can be granted \"while preserving its essential features\". including those the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals described as \"crucial\". Id. at 1120. Applying much stricter pre-Rufo standard for modification of consent decrees, the Third Circuit affirmed a modification which \"eliminated the numerical requirements\" for screenings. Id. at 1119. 30\"[T]he public interest is a particularly significant reason for applying a flexible modification standard in institutional reform litigation because such decrees \"reach beyond the parties involved directly in the suit and impact on the public's right to sound an efficient operation of its institutions.\" Elifs, 116 L.Ed.2d at 885, quoting Heath v. DeCourcv. 888 F.2d 1105, 1109 (6th Cir. 1989). Modification of a consent decree may be warranted \"when enforcement of the decree without modification would be detrimental to the public interest\". Eufe, 116 L.Ed.2d at 886-87. In this case, the public interest in sound and efficient operation of the Little Rock School District weighs against a requirement to construct a new school in an area of declining population and relatively low enrollment in its existing schools. Finally, the rule adopted by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in this case for reviewing contested proposed modifications of the desegregation plans is not inconsistent with the Supreme Court's later decision in Rufo. Lorain NAACP v. Lorain Bd. of Edu^, 979 F.2d 1141, 1149 (6th Cir. 1992). In order to modify a consent decree, the Eighth Circuit said, the district court \"need only identify a defect or deficiency in its original decree which impedes achieving its goal, either because experience has proven it less effective [or] disadvantageous, or because circumstances and conditions have changed which warrant fine-tuning the decree.\" Appeal of Little Rock School District. 949 F.2d 253, 258 (8th Cir. 1991), quoting Heath v. DeCourcv. 88 F.2d 1105, 1110 (6th Cir. 1989) . In this case. the post-settlement establishment and ku^\\DaaH-Pl.Bri 31retention of Washington school as an interdistrict school and the decline in population and enrollment in the area targeted for location of LRSD interdistrict schools constitute changed circumstances which warrant fine tuning the settlement plans to recognize Washington in place of Stephens as an interdistrict school. This proposed modification should be approved because \"it furthers the original purpose of the decree in a more efficient way, without upsetting the basic agreement between the parties\". Id. E. Financial Constraints The financial constraints under which LRSD continues to operate provide further support for the consent decree modification requested by LRSD: \"Financial constraints may not be used to justify the creation or perpetuation of constitutional violations, but they a legitimate concern of government defendants institutional reform litigation and therefore are appropriately considered in tailoring a consent decree modification.\" are in Rufo V. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail. 502 U.S. 116 L.Ed.2d 867, 891-92 (1992). LRSD presently projects a budget deficit for next year in excess of $7,000,000.00. The cost of constructing a new interdistrict school and the high per pupil expenditure required to operate a school in an area of declining population and enrollment are a legitimate concern to LRSD which should be considered by the Court as a factor supporting the requested consent decree modification. Id. kMhy\\DBaet-n.Bri 32CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion For Modification of Desegregation Plan has been served on the following people by depositing copy of same in the United States mail on this 20th day of April, 1994. Mr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell and Streett First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Elizabeth Boyter Arkansas Dept, of Education 4 State Capitol Mall Little Rock, AR 72201-1071 Christopher Hell 3gQPglM^iQn The modification of the LRSD and Interdistrict Plans proposed by LRSD does not diminish the basic elements of those plans. The parties agreed in 1989 to establish 600 seat Stephens a Interdistrict School \"near the 1-630 corridor between 1-30 and University Avenue\". 10 J.D.R. 2232. There has been established instead a 939 seat Washington Interdistrict School near the 1-630 corridor between 1-30 and University Avenue. The other two LRSD Interdistrict Schools required by the 1989 LRSD and Interdistrict Plans, Romine and King, are now in operation. The modification can be made without reducing those elements the plan considered crucial by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. The significant changes and circumstances since the settlement plans were written are clearly sufficient to warrant the requested modification of the plans under the standards described by the Supreme Court in Rufo and by the Eighth Circuit in this case. Respectfully submitted. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Street Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 Bv\nr________...______ Christopher Helle^^ Bar No. 81083 33I I I C [ It / 6^,-c.k^ 6^, / ai, l/\\H'-ti i_ (/-CCy' / S' / i f 'RECEIVED yl/C4^^ rf Mji_ 3: (y-c.k^ NOV 1 6 1994 Office of Desegregai i 4 I ioi). z - ?y\\A ^L. t.Cr / 'i 1 1^-. 'tLC' ' i~ C-IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL ORDER FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS FOQ 1995 JAMES W. McCORMACK, CLERK By: .V OEP CLERK PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS On May 20, 1994, the Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") filed a motion to close Stephens Incentive School [doc.#2191]. In its motion, the LRSD states that it has constructed the number of interdistrict schools required by the desegregation plans, and that, assuming the Court grants its April 20, 1994 motion to designate Washington as the required second new LRSD interdistrict school in place of a new Stephens interdistrict school [doc.#2160], the district will have operating within its boundaries the required number of interdistrict schools. The LRSD goes on to state that Stephens school is in an area of declining enrollment and population (and, in fact, has experienced declining enrollment)\nthat there are a large number of empty school seats in the Stephens general area (including empty seats at the King and Washington interdistrict schools)\nand that the facility itself is in a state of decline, the renovation of which cannot be justified. The Court held a hearing on June 7, 1994, to address the issues raised in the LRSD's motion to close Stephens. During the hearing, 2 1 the LRSD provided the Court with a \"Stipulation and Settlement Agreement Regarding Stephens and Garland Schools\" (\"stipulation\") in which it proposes building a new Stephens school within the same general area in which the Stephens and Garland schools are now locatedJ In the stipulation, the LRSD states that the new Stephens will be a magnet school with a student body made up primarily of black students and white students from the LRSD and also some majority-to-minority transfer students from the Pulaski County Special School District (\"PCSSD\"). The LRSD further states that Garland Incentive School will be closed upon the opening of the new Stephens school, and that the Garland students will thereupon be assigned to Stephens. Although all parties to this lawsuit approved the stipulation. the Court announced to the parties its conclusion that the stipulation was deficient in several respects (which will be discussed infra), and that certain inforaation would be required before the Court could give its final approval for the construction of a new Stephens school. Among other things, the Court stated that it required detailed plans for student recruitment and a long- range facilities plan which tcikes into account the declining and shifting populations in Little Rock and which justifies construction of a 700-seat school which the parties have proposed for the Stephens site. The Court did, however, state that Stephens could be closed and its students reassigned. The stipulation, which was filed on June 8, was approved by aU parties to this lawsuit. 2In a status report regarding Stephens that was filed August 24, 1994, the LRSD stated that it had begun a long-range facility study and that it intended to begin demolition of Stephens in the immediate future. The district also stated that it would not begin construction of a new Stephens school building until the parties had addressed issues raised by the Court at the June 7 hearing, such as the size of the school and how it would be populated and desegregated. However, it has now been some five months since the LRSD's status report and the information requested by the Court in June 1994 has yet to be submitted.^ Because the target date for the opening of the new Stephens school draws ever closer, the Court now reiterates what was stated at the June 7 hearing and what is required of the LRSD before this Court will approve construction of a new Stephens school as set forth in the stipulation. As indicated at the Jiine 7 hearing, the LRSD's motions to designate Washington as the new interdistrict school required by the desegregation plan and to close the Stephens Incentive School [doc.#'s 2160 and 2191] should both be and hereby are granted. In approving the LRSD's motion to close Stephens, the Court reiterates that the LRSD is obligated to recruit white students to desegregate the remaining incentive schools. The Court will continue to closely watch all proposed school closings and school capacity 2 The original target date for completion of the facilities study, as noted in the July 29, 1994 LRSD management tool, was November 23, 1994. The target date remained the same in the August and September management tools, but changed to January 30, 1995 in the management tool dated October 31, 1994. The November 30,1994 management tool changed the target date again to August 15, 1995. 3alterations to determine the effect on desegregation and whether there is a pattern of closing schools in areas largely inhabited by black citizens while increasing the capacity of schools in areas largely inhabited by white citizens. With respect to the construction of a new Stephens school, the LRSD cites as justification for closing Stephens the fact that the school has experienced declining enrollment and is located in an area of decreasing population and student enrollment. In this regard, the LRSD states that there are many empty school seats in the Stephens general area, including over 350 vacant seats at the King and Washington interdistrict schools. Nevertheless, the LRSD proposes building a new 700-seat school on the current Stephens site, notwithstanding the fact that during the 1993-94 school year. a total of only 350 students attended Stephens and Garland combined (only 218 of which lived within the schools' attendance zones) and notwithstanding the fact that the LRSD itself indicates that such data counsels against constructing a new Stephens school in the area now under consideration. Indeed, the LRSD states in its brief accompanying its motion for modification of the desegregation plan that \"[tlhe 1990 census and recent LRSD and PCSSD enrollment data show that there is no longer a need for new construction which would justify the building of a new interdistrict school, and that [t]he cost of constructing a new interdistrict school and the high per pupil expenditure required to operate a school in an area of 3 205 children attended Garland (136 from the attendance zone), and 145 attended Stephens (82 from the attendance zone). 4declining population and enrollment are a legitimate concern to LRSD which should be considered by the Court as a factor supporting the requested consent decree modification.\" (Brief in Support, at pg. 29 and 32.) Because of the apparent contradictions contained within the LRSD's proposals, the Court stated that the LRSD must justify the construction of a new school at the existing Stephens site as a prerequisite to the Court approving the stipulation. Specifically, the Court stated that it requires detailed information regarding the size of the new Stephens school to be constructed and the basis for the school's capacity\ndetailed information regarding the plan for recruiting white students\ndetailed information regarding student assignment zones\nand detailed information regarding the impact of the new Stephens school on the racial balance of all the schools. In addition, the Court stated that it requires a new long-range facilities plan that will guide the district's use of its facilities for several years to come. At the hearing, the Court expressed concern over the controversy that had developed when the district prepared to close Baseline Elementary School as the 1993- 94 school year was ending. Many parents at the hearing told the Court they were unaware or surprised at the district's plans to close Baseline, and that they believed the district was not proceeding in good faith to involve the parents and community in making the decisions that directly affected them, their children. and their neighborhood. 5The desegregation plans repeatedly stress the importance of involving parents and other citizens in the schools, calling for the districts to \"solicit and sustain community involvement\" (Interdistrict Plan, pg. 66). The Court of Appeals has recognized the importance of this aspect of the desegregation plans, identifying appropriate parent involvement as an element of the plans which is \"crucial. and with respect to which no retreat should be approved.\" Appeal of Little Rock School District. 949 F.2d 253, 256 (Sth Cir. 1991). This Court has continued to emphasize the role which meaningful parent involvement plays in keeping the community happy with its schools. The Court has stressed that the public is better satisfied when the parties keep citizens adequately informed and involved, and when the districts do a good job of helping their constituents anticipate and prepare for the changes that affect their schools. The Court has noted the link between information. involvement, and stability: \"Anticipating changes and having a process to go through when changes are taking place are very important to stability.\" (June 28, 1994 Hearing Transcript, pg. 55.) Furthermore, the desegregation plan and orders of this Court recognize that \"desegregation will succeed only so far as the community supports and participates in it.\" (December 30, 1992 Order, pg. 17.) Any facilities study which the district conducts must yield a facilities plan which incorporates a coherent and well-reasoned decision-making process that will guide the district in changing the use (including closure) of any school or building. That process must specifically involve the community with the aim of 6preventing situations of trepidation similar to that which surrounded the potential closing of Baseline. The 1988 facilities study, which was produced for the LRSD by Stanton Leggett and Associates and was referred to at the hearing. was quite comprehensive, but it is no longer current. As the LRSD develops its facilities plan, the district may wish to include the same type of information which that study covered, incorporating current data. However, rather than details concerning the condition of physical plants and equipment, the Court is more interested in the district developing criteria for detezrmining how its buildings will be used, modified, expanded, or closed based on information that specifically takes into consideration the district's desegregation obligations, including community involvement. and the effect that building use has on students and achieving the desegregation goals. Components of the facilities plan, as well as minimum planning factors and considerations the LRSD must use, are set forth below. These items are broad general categories to be utilized with respect to determining whether and how the function of a school or other district building might be altered.* The detailed planning of the items should be executed by the LRSD, although the Coxirt notes that its Office of Desegregation Monitoring remains available to provide assistance. Although the LRSD is free to conduct a study that is as comprehensive and detailed as it wishes, the facilities plan should be based at a minimum on those factors Of course, closing schools is a modification of the desegregation plan and the requisite process must be followed. 4 7listed below: A. A facilities needs assessment based on trends in student population and staffing, on demographic and geographic considerations, and on student assignment zones. B. An analysis of facility resources, including capacities. location, campus size, and any special features or limitations. C. A proposed facilities use plan for all district buildings for the next five to ten years that takes into account the factors above and: 1. 2. district goals and objectives desegregation requirements obligations) (including interdistrict 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. decision criteria for facilities actions (criteria the district will use to guide decisions that affect its facilities) identification and analysis of options proposed facilities changes impact of programmatic changes, such as middle schools reassignment of students and the impact on enrollment and racial balance at receiving schools the burden of busing on students impact on financial stability 3. The facilities study should also include an examination of the buildings currently used for administrative space. The Court notes that the district presently expends a considerable sum in renting the Parkin building and a nearby parking lot while several former schools sit empty. At any time the LRSD comes before the Court proposing to change the use of a school or other building, the Court will make its decision on whether to approve the proposal in relation to the district's facilities plan for all of its buildings (based on the elements named above), the extent to which the district has followed the requisite plan modification process, and the manner in 8which the district has involved the community in its decisions. The Court again stresses that parental involvement is a key requirement of the desegregation plan. As stated in a recent order, the swiftest and surest way out of the federal court is to abide by the terms and spirit of the settlement agreement, and this includes community involvement in the planning and decision-making process with respect to school closings. Only with a cooperative relationship between the district and the community can success in implementing the settlement agreement be achieved. In sum, the Court grants the LRSD's motions to designate Washington as the second interdistrict school which the desegregation plan obligated the district to build and also to close Stephens Incentive School [doc.#'s 2160, 2191]. The Court withholds approval of the construction of a new Stephens school as proposed in the stipulation pending receipt of information and data that demonstrates such constniction is justified. IT IS SO ORDERED this day of February 1995. UNlffio STATES IHSTraCT JUDGE rWIS DOCUMENT ENTERED O-N-- -D--O---C--K--ET SHEET IN COMPtlANi ON___ RULE 58 BY 9 * Hearing held, transcript not yet received DATE OF HEARING Sept. 10, 1996 August 29, 1996 August 19, 1996 June 6, 1996 May 31, 1996 May 30, 1996 May 15, 1996 May 14, 1996 May 13, 1996 Mar. 26, 1996 Dec. 14, 1995 Dec. 15, 1995 Dec. 8, 1995 Oct. 28, 1995 Sept. 8, 1995 Sept. 1, 1995 August 31, 1995 August 30, 1995 LISTING OF COURT HEARINGS, DIRECTIVES, AND TRANSCRIPT SUMMARIES SUBJECT HARD COPY ON DISC DIRECTIVES PULLED SUMMARY COMPLETE BY (NAME OF- PERSON) TRO-paying teachers during strike PCSSD strike Joshuas fees LRSD 96-97 budget State funding formula- conf for setting deadlines Expert Witness Gary Orfield Expert Witness David Armor Expert Witnesses Herbert Walberg and David Armor Expert Witness Herbert Walberg LRSD Budget M-to-M Pooling M-to-M Pooling (continued) LRSD, ServiceMaster LRSD, ServiceMaster LRSD, PCSSD, ADE pooling LRSD release of court supervision NLRSD release of court supervision PCSSD release of court supervision Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes YesDATE OF HEARING August 28, 1995 August 25, 1995 August 11, 1995 lUgust 2, 1995 August 1, 1995 July 14, 1995 July 7, 1995 July 6, 1995 June 23, 1995 April 10, 1995 March 24, 1995 March 9, 1995 Sept. 21, 1994 Sept. 16, 1994 Sept. 15, 1994 Sept. 14, 1994 August 12, 1994 July 29, 1994 July 28, 1994 June 29, 1994 June 28, 1994 June 7, 1994 April 22, 1994 Feb 25, 1994 SUBJECT Continuation on contempt motion by Joshua Emergency contempt of court by Joshua LRSD 1995-96 budget LRSD 1995-96 budget NLRSD \u0026amp; PCSSD 1995-96 budget Telephone conference (M-to-M pooling) LRSD 1995-96 budget LRSD 1995-96 budget LRSD 1995-96 budget LRSD 1995-96 budget LRSD 1995-96 budget On-the-record conference (plan modifications) ADE reitLstatement ADE reinstatement ADE reinstatement ADE reinstatement LRSD 1994-95 budget LRSD 1994-95 budget PCSSD 1994-95 budget LRSD 1994-95 budget LRSD 1994-95 budget Closing Stephens LRSD 1994-95 budget LRSD 1994-95 planning \u0026amp; budgeting process HARD COPY Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Ye.s Yes Yes ON DISC No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes DIRECTIVES PULLED Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes SUMMARY COMPLETE BY (NAME OF PERSON) Bob \u0026amp; Polly Polly Margie Margie MelissaDATE OF HEARING SUBJECT HARD COPY ON DISC DIRECTIVES PULLED SUMMARY COMPLETE BY (NAME OF PERSON) Jan 27, 1994 Jan 26, 1994 Jan 25, 1994 Nov 18, 1993 Nov 17, 1993 Aug 17, 1993 Aug 12, 1993 July 8, 1993 July 7, 1993 June 24, 1993 June 9, 1993 June 8, 1993 April 19, 1993 April 14, 1993 April 13, 1993 March 19, 1993 Feb 1, 1993 Aug 3, 1992 July 2, 1992 July 1, 1992 June 30, 1992 May 29, 1992 (p.m.) 1992-93 Incentive Schs Monitoring Rpt (a.m.) 1992-93 Incentive Schs Monitoring Rpt 1992-93 Incentive SchixiLs Monitoring Report PCSSD Racial Balance Monitoring Report Stephens Schtx)! ADE reinstatement PCSSD 1993-93 budget LRSD 1993-94 budget and budget process LRSD 1993-94 budget PCSSD 1993-94 budget Stephens Interdistrict Schcxrl King Interdistrict School en King Interdistrict School LRSD budget cuts Rezoning (not deseg related) (continuation) Rezoning (not deseg related) LRSD budget cuts LRSD budget process LRSD budget PCSSD budget cuts Incentive Schools Incentive Schools Delay of interdistrict schools and modification of the magnet program at McClellan Yes Yes Ye.s Ye.s Yes Yes Yes Yes Ye.s Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Scatmed Yes Yes Scanned Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes . Yes N/A N/A Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A N/A Yes Yes Horace Horace Horace \u0026amp; Polly Melissa Margie Horace Melissa Connie/Bill Bob Bob Margie Melissa Horace Melissa N/A N/A Margie ConnieDATE OF HEARING March 9, 1992 Feb 7, 1992 Feb 6, 1992 Jan 28, 1992 Jan 27, 1992 Jan 23, 1992 Jan 22, 1992 Jan 21, 1992 Dec 19, 1991 Dec 18, 1991 Aug 7, 1991 March 20, 1991 Jan 25, 1991 SUBJECT King Jnterdistrict School site Continuation (completing modification hearings) Continuation Continuation Continuation Continuation Continuation Proposed modifications-1989 settlement plans PCSSD \u0026amp; LRSD budgets PCSSD \u0026amp; LRSD budgets Partial stay Construction Aerospace Magnet School HARD COPY Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes ON DISC No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes Scanned Yes Scanned No DIRECTIVES PULLED SUMMARY COMPLETE BY (NAME OF PERSON)* Hearing held, transcript not yet received DATE OF HEARING Sept. 10, 1996 August 29, 1996 August 19, 1996 June 6, 1996 May 31, 1996 May 30, 1996 May 15, 1996 May 14, 1996 May 13, 1996 Mar. 26, 1996 Dec. 14, 1995 Dec. 15, 1995 Dec. 8, 1995 Oct. 28, 1995 Sept. 8, 1995 Sept. 1, 1995 August 31, 1995 August 30, 1995 LISTING OF COURT HEARINGS, DIRECTIVES, AND TRANSCRIPT SUMMARIES SUBJECT HARD COPY ON DISC DIRECTIVES PULLED SUMMARY COMPLETE BY (NAME OF PERSON) 7/31/94 TRO-paying teachers during strike PCSSD strike Joshuas fees LRSD 96-97 budget State funding formula- conf for setting deadlines Expert Witness Gary Orfield Expert Witness David Armor Expert Witnesses Herbert Walberg and David Armor Expert Witness Herbert Walberg LRSD Budget M-to-M Pooling M-to-M Pooling (continued) LRSD, ServiceMaster LRSD, ServiceMaster LRSD, PCSSD, ADE pooling LRSD release of court supervision NLRSD release of court supervision PCSSD release of court supervision Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes YesDATE OF HEARING August 28, 1995 August 25, 1995 August 11, 1995 ,ugust 2, 1995 August 1, 1995 July 14, 1995 July 7, 1995 July 6, 1995 June 23, 1995 April 10, 1995 March 24, 1995 March 9, 1995 Sept. 21, 1994 Sept. 16, 1994 Sept. 15, 1994 Sept. 14, 1994 August 12, 1994 July 29, 1994 July 28, 1994 June 29, 1994 June 28, 1994 June 7, 1994 April 22, 1994 Feb 25, 1994 SUBJECT Continuation on contempt motion by Joshua Emergency contempt of court by Joshua LRSD 1995-96 budget LRSD 1995-96 budget NLRSD \u0026amp; PCSSD 1995-96 budget Telephone conference (M-to-M pooling) LRSD 1995-96 budget LRSD 1995-96 budget LRSD 1995-96 budget LRSD 1995-96 budget LRSD 1995-96 budget On-the-record conference (plan modifications) ADE reinstatement ADE reinstatement ADE reinstatement ADE reinstatement LRSD 1994-95 budget LRSD 1994-95 budget PCSSD 1994-95 budget LRSD 1994-95 budget LRSD 1994-95 budget Closing Stephens LRSD 1994-95 budget LRSD 1994-95 planning \u0026amp; budgeting process HARD COPY Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes ON DISC No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes DIRECTIVES PULLED Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes SUMMARY COMPLETE BY (NAME OF PERSON) Bob \u0026amp; Polly Polly Margie Margie MelissaDATE OF HEARING SUBJECT HARD COPY ON DISC DIRECTIVES PULLED SUMMARY COMPLETE BY (NAME OF PERSON) Jan 27, 1994 Jan 26, 1994 Jan 25, 1994 Nov 18, 1993 Nov 17, 1993 Aug 17, 1993 Aug 12, 1993 July 8, 1993 July 7, 1993 June 24, 1993 June 9, 1993 June 8, 1993 April 19, 1993 April 14, 1993 April 13, 1993 March 19, 1993 Feb 1, 1993 Aug 3, 1992 July 2, 1992 July 1, 1992 June 30, 1992 May 29, 1992 (p.m.) 1992-93 Incentive Schs Monitoring Rpt (a.m.) 1992-93 Incentive Schs Monitoring Rpt 1992-93 Incentive Schools Monitoring Report PCSSD Racial Balance Monitoring Report Stephens School ADE reinstatement PCSSD 1993-93 budget LRSD 1993-94 budget and budget process LRSD 1993-94 budget PCSSD 1993-94 budget Stephens Interdistrict School King Interdistrict School King Interdistrict School LRSD budget cuts Rezoning (not deseg related) (continuation) Rezoning (not deseg related) LRSD budget cuts LRSD budget process LRSD budget PCSSD budget cuts Incentive Schools Incentive Schools Delay of interdistrict schools and modification of the magnet program at McClellan Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Scanned Yes Yes Scanned Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A N/A Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A N/A Yes Yes Horace Horace Horace \u0026amp; Polly Melissa Margie Horace Melissa Connie/Bill Bob Bob Margie Melissa Horace Melissa N/A N/A Margie ConnieDATE OF HEARING March 9, 1992 Feb 7, 1992 Feb 6, 1992 Jan 28, 1992 Jan 27, 1992 Jan 23, 1992 Jan 22, 1992 Jan 21, 1992 Dec 19, 1991 Dec 18, 1991 Aug 7, 1991 March 20, 1991 Jan 25, 1991 SUBJECT King Interdistrict School site Continuation (completing modification hearings) Continuation Continuation Continuation Continuation Continuation Proposed modifications-1989 settlement plans PCSSD \u0026amp; LRSD budgets PCSSD \u0026amp; LRSD budgets Partial stay Construction Aerospace Magnet School HARD COPY Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes ON DISC No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes Scarmed Yes Scanned No DIRECTIVES PULLED SUMMARY COMPLETE BY (NAME OF PERSON)suop^npojj lapAus mox an3sa\u0026gt;{ ueaaQ jeaio aqjL o V. o )1J Cii Omh Rtto Booker T. Washington Math/Science Magnet School is \u0026lt;0 BECEIV50 MAY 8 1995 OHice of Desegregation Monitoring / You are cordially invited to drop in May 8-11 to observe our fifth grade students as they participate in an exciting interactive technology unit, The Great Ocean Rescue. Please visit during any of the following time blocks: 8:00 a.m. -10:00 a.m. 11:00 a.m. -12:30 p.m. 1:15 p.m. - 2:30 p.m. Booker T. Washington Math/Science Magnet School 115 West 27th Street iUnit Rationale MAY 8 1995 The Great Ocean Rescue Office of Desegreg\n,^. j, ,, , j v m . i v.. The following vision statement was developed by the Technology Planning Committee of the Little Rock School District: The Cittle TCock School District, in keeping with its mission and goals, will provide a quality, integrated educational program through the use of technology which promotes optimum achievement academically, socially, and emotionally. Cittle ^ock School District will provide an environment which promotes interactive learning, thus empowering students to meet the challenges of the advancing technology of the Zlst century. Cittle T^ock School District will provide opportunities through technology which empower students, staff, and community to achieve excellence, to think critically and creatively to solve problems in an ever-changing society and to access, utilize, and communicate information globally. This unit of study has been designed as a tool for fifth grade teachers to use as they begin to meet the challenge of the aforementioned vision statement. The Great Ocean Rescue laserdisc and software program, published by Tom Snyder Productions, has been used as a framework for this unit. The reference books supplied with the game will be used as functional print sources. The Island of the Blue Dolphins will serve as a literature link. Nystrom Study Prints and AIMS materials will be utilized. Our Great Ocean Rescue unit reaches across the curriculum and integrates traditional pencil and paper tasks with cooperative learning teams, computer usage, hands-on activities, and community resources. Students that receive special services (Reading or Math PAL, Resource Room instruction) will receive direct service delivery in the regular classroom so that they may be totally immersed in the unit activities. Fifth grade classrooms will visit the Intermediate Science Lab on a daily basis. Students will visit other specialists classrooms and will complete integrated lessons which support this units theme. The units design has been carefully scheduled so that four classrooms of students may participate and compete against one another as they play The Great Ocean Rescue laserdisc game. It is our intent that this unit be used in the future by classroom teachers without extra specialist support. Individual teachers will find scheduling much less restrictive and will enjoy having the use of a laserdisc player and computer in their classroom for a week long loan period.R MAY 3 The Great Ocean Rescue Office oi C, Unit Rationale The following vision statement was developed by the Technology Planning Committee of the Little Rock School District: 'The CiTtle ^ock School District, in keeping with its mission and goals, will provide a quality, integrated educational program through the use of technology which promotes optimum achievement academically, socially, and emotionally. fit tie JLock School District will provide an environment which promotes interactive learning, thus empowering students to meet the challenges of the advancing technology of the 2.1st century. Ci trie C^^ock School District will provide opportunities through technology which empower students, staff, and community to achieve excellence, to think critically and creatively to solve problems in an ever-changing society and to access, utilize, and communicate information globally. This unit of study has been designed as a tool for Hfth grade teachers to use as they begin to meet the challenge of the aforementioned vision statement. The Great Ocean Rescue laserdisc and software program, published by Tom Snyder Productions, has been used as a framework for this unit. The reference books supplied with the game will be used as functional print sources. The Island of the Blue Dolphins will serve as a literature link. Nystrom Study Prints and AIMS materials will be utilized. Our Great Ocean Rescue unit reaches across the curriculum and integrates traditional pencil and paper tasks with cooperative learning teams, computer usage, hands-on activities, and community resources. Students that receive special services (Reading or Math PAL, Resource Room instruction) will receive direct service delivery in the regular classroom so that they may be totally immersed in the unit activities. Fifth grade classrooms will visit the Intermediate Science Lab on a daily basis. Students will visit other specialists classrooms and will complete integrated lessons which support this units theme. The units design has been carefully scheduled so that four classrooms of students may participate and compete against one another as they play The Great Ocean Rescue laserdisc game. It is our intent that this unit be used in the future by classroom teachers without extra specialist support. Individual teachers will find scheduling much less restrictive and wUl enjoy having the use of a laserdisc player and computer in their classroom for a week long loan period.RECSW I i i HiY 8 ms Office of Dessgregaucn Monnonns I I t I ' 15 You are cordially invited to drop in May 8-11 to observe our fifth grade students as they participate in an exciting interactive technology unit, The Great Ocean Rescue. 1 i Please visit during any of the following time blocks: 8:00 a.m. -10:00 a.m. 11:00 a.m. -12:30 p.m. 1:15 p.m. - 2:30 p.m. Booker T. Washington Math/Science Magnet School 115 West 27th StreetSeptember 30, 1995 ocr j 1995 Office of Desegregation Monitor Ann Brown 201 East Markham Suite 510 Heritage West Bldg Little Rock, AR 72201 Qi Vear Ann Brown\nI have chosen to write this letter directly to you since I have spoken at length with you in the past about certain aspects of the Little Rock School District. My child was involved in an incident at Washington Magnet Elementary on August 28th of this year that I feel should be brought to your attention. The facts of what happened are as follows: (to the best I can ascertain) My first-grader and her friend Lyndsey (also a first grader) went to the restroom before school. Apparently they were in the same stall of the restroom and also sitting or laying on the floor (perhaps crawling under the stalls?)when two older children came into the restroom. These children reported to Ms. Buchanan that \"something strange\" was going on in the restroom. Meanwhile my child and her friend had left the bathroom and gone to class. Ms. Buchanan sent the older children from room to room with an aide until they pointed out the two children they had seen in the restroom. My child and her friend were then escorted to the principal's office where Ms. Buchanan and apparently the counselor Ms. Kuhns questioned them both together and separately to determine what had occurred. Although Ms. Buchanan has maintained that the line of questioning was of a general nature such as \"Has anything happened to either of you?\" and \"Are you alright?\". My child reported the questions as \"Did you lay on top of your friend\" and \"Did you have her dress up?\" I was contacted after the questioning was over and told that I needed to speak with my child about the \"privacy issue\". I later called the other child's parents and was told that they had no knowledge of the incident. When I questioned Ms. Buchanan about this she said that the parents did not speak English (although I did speak with the father on the phone) and that she had thought they were coming in with an interpreter the afternoon of the incident for a conference, so she was planning to talk to them then. However, she later realized that the parents who came in were another child's parents and by that time she had decided that \"nothing had really occurred\" so she decided not to call the other parents.My concerns about this incident are: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Since this type of behavior (sharing stalls \u0026amp; playing in the restroom) is typical of six-year olds the fact that they were questioned at all seems ridiculous. Sin\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_705","title":"Student assignment","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1973/2005"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","School management and organization","School administrators","Educational law and legislation"],"dcterms_title":["Student assignment"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/705"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nC/-44 Little Rock School District Job Description JOB TITLE\nDEPARTMENT: LOCATION: Director of Student Assignment Student Assignment 501 Sherman Street SALARY: GRADE: SUPERVISOR: $34,139-$54,859 ADMN12 Associate Superintendent PREPARED BY: C. Russell Mayo_______________ APPROVED BY: Henry P. Williams, Superintendent DATE: January 6, 1995 DATE: January 6, 1995 SUMMARY Directs and coordinates the day-to-day operation of the Student Assignment Office by performing the following duties personally or through subordinate supervisors. ESSENTIAL DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Directs student assignment program and reviews exceptional assignment cases\nConfers with staff and principals to explain assignment requirements based on the Little Rock School District desegregation plan\nDirects preparation of printed materials explaining assignment requirements and policies for dissemination to schools and patrons\nCounsels patrons having problems understanding assignment procedures and supervises assignment coordinators\nSupervises the student recruitment program\nKeeps the Associate Superintendent for Desegregation informed and updated on progress made in performing responsibilities relating to student assignment and on any relevant information discovered in the performance of these duties\nAssists with developmental planning in the areas of long-range student assignment policies, magnet school development, program placement, and equal educational opportunity planning, and proposal development by providing demographic information and other pertinent information\nAssists with monitoring and evaluating the districts desegregation plan\nAssists in identifying problems or practices that impede the implementation of quality desegregation in the student assignment process\nStays informed of current issues before the Board of Directors by attending Board Meetings\nProvides for the development, implementation, and evaluation of staff training for Student Assignment Office personnel\nAttends LRSD Board of Director meetings and other meetings as requested\nCoordinates the student assignment appeals committee\nand. Performs other duties as assigned\nSUPERVISORY RESPONSIBILITIES Manages three subordinate supervisors who supervise a total of six employees in the Parent Recruitment, Student Assignment, and Student Assignment Information area. Is responsible for the overall direction, coordination, and evaluation of these units. Also directly supervises one non-supervisory employee. Carries out supervisory responsibilities in accordance with the organizations policies and applicable laws. Responsibilities include interviewing, hiring, and training employees\nplanning, assigning, and directing work\nappraising performance\nrewarding and disciplining employees\naddressing complaints and resolving problems. 1M/95U.S. DiSTS\nt court EASTEP,?! DISTRICT A-.'t\u0026lt;.t\u0026gt;K'R4S IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT t 3 1995 EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION JAMES W. McC0R?*5ACK. CL??:/ By\n----------------------------- op- LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS NOTICE OF FILING The Little Rock School District (LRSD) hereby gives notice of the filing of the attached \"Little Rock School District Interdistrict School Assignment Guidelines\". This document is being filed in order to apprise the court. the monitor and the parties of the desegregation efforts being made by LRSD. Respectfully submitted. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Street Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 Byr Jistopher Helled Bar No. 81083CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Notice of Filing has been served on the following people by depositing copy of same in the United States mail on this 3rd day of February 1995: Mr. John Walker .JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell and Streett First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Elizabeth Boyter Arkansas Dept, of Education 4 State Capitol Mall Little Rock, AR 72201-1071 Christopher Heller^ 2Little Rock School District Interdistrict School Assignment Guidelines It is the intent of the Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") that LRSD Interdistrict schools exist primarily to bring non-black students from surrounding school districts together with black students from the LRSD. LRSD non-black students may attend interdistrict schools in the LRSD as outlined in the District's assignment guidelines. The guidelines below will apply to all interdistrict schools in the LRSD. 1. The assignment guidelines are consistent with both the LRSD Desegregation Plan and the Interdistrict Plan with reference to the following sections: a) There will be established interdistrict schools which shall seek to obtain a ratio of between 60 percent and 40 percent of either race with the ideal goal of these interdistrict schools to be 50 percent black/white. Proposed interdistrict schools shall be phased-in to these ratios over time. (Interdistrict Plan, p.3) 2. b) This plan will permit the treatment of interdistrict transfers (including the NLRSD) where students are moving from a situation where their race is a greater proportion of the total student body of a school to a school where their race is a lesser proportion of the student body of a school as Interdistrict Majority-to-Minority transfers under the Court's Order. (Interdistrict Plan, p. 11, Potential Interdistrict M-to-M Enhancements) The process described below will be followed during the LRSD winter pre-registration each year. Following pre-registration each year. additional students may be enrolled at an interdistrict school if there is a seat available for the student and if his or her enrollment does not cause the school's proportion of white students to reach or exceed 50% and does not cause the school's proportion of black students to exceed 60%. as follows: The pre-registration process will be conducted a) Black students from the school's attendance zone will be assigned up to 51% of capacity at each grade level. If demand exceeds capacity, those students who cannot be assigned will be placed on a waiting list. Placement on the kindergarten waiting list will be determined by a lottery. Students who cannot be assigned because of These guidelines assume that interdistrict schools will be located in predominately black attendance zones.3. 4. capacity will be assigned to the closest school with capacity which meets racial balance requirements. If the student's closest school with capacity is an incentive school, that student may choose to attend that incentive school where such an assignment would not inhibit the initial reservation of seats for pre-kindergarten and kindergarten students. Priority for incentive school seats, however, would remain with those students who live in the incentive school attendance zone. b) c) d) Non-black students from the school's attendance zone will be assigned. Non-black students from the Pulaski County Special School District assigned through (PCSSD) and beyond Pulaski County will be the process or appropriate state statutes. Majority-to-Minority transfer The proportion of non-black students will not reach or exceed 50% of the school's total enrollment. Once the Majority-to-Minority transfer students have been assigned, students will be assigned to the school. will not be allowed, however, non-black LRSD An assignment if it would cause the proportion of non-black students to reach or exceed 50% of the total enrollment or would cause the racial balance of the sending school to fall outside of the acceptable racial balance range. Children of staff members will be attendance zone and PCSSD students are placed. assigned after Transfers are subject to desegregation guidelines and the LRSD Desegreijation Plan, p. Employees. 141. Transfer of Children of Those LRSD non-black students currently attending an LRSD interdistrict school may remain until they matriculate out of the sixth grade. However, the siblings of those students may not be assigned to an interdistrict school unless such an assignment complies with these Interdistrict School Assignment Guidelines. LRSD black students who move out of the interdistrict school zone will be reassigned. at the time their address change is processed, to the new attendance zone school. In no event will non-black students from the LRSD, PCSSD or elsewhere be allowed to enroll in a LRSD interdistrict school where to do so would cause that school's enrollment to shift from being majority black to majority white. thereby negatively affecting the interdistrict M-to-M funding status of that LRSD interdistrict school. lottfayVIaiARlialriet.CuidelioM 2Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 May 30, 1995 Mrs. Verma Simmons 2715 Montreal Little Rock, AR 72204 Dear Mrs. Simmons: I am responding to your letter on behalf of Judge Susan Webber Wright. Although she is sensitive to the concerns community members have about desegregation and other educational issues, as a matter of policy. Judge Wright does not correspond directly with citizens. Instead she relies on us in her Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM) to discuss school matters with individuals and organizations. In the letter you sent to Dr. Williams, you described concerns about the enrollment procedures followed by the Little Rock School District and asked the district to reconsider your daughters assignment to Central High School. While I am sensitive to your concern, individual student assignment issues are generally beyond the purview of our office. ODM serves as an arm of the United States Federal District Court and assists the Court in monitoring the three Pulaski County school districts compliance with their desegregation plans and court orders. While the districts refusal to reconsider your daughters assignment may seem unfair, it appears that the Student Assignment Office followed established procedures. It is unfortunate that an official change of address was not recorded prior to the magnet school assignments being made. I hope you are able to work with the district to find a mutually satisfactory resolution to this issue. If in the future you have questions or concerns which may be appropriate for us to address, please dont hesitate to call on us. Sincerely, Melissa Guldin Associate MonitorJOHN w. Walker, P.A. Attorney At Law 1723 Broadway Little Rock. Arkansas 72206 Telephone (501) 374-3758 FAX (501) 3744187 J*' AUG 5 1 1955 a JOHN W. WALKER RALPH WASHINGTON MARK BURNETTE AUSTIN PORTER. JR. via Facsimile - 371-0100 CJfice of Dessgregaiion Mcnixnng August 29, 1995 Ms. Ann Brown Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 East Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ms. Brown: This is a followup to our just completed telephone conversation regarding Little Rock School District pupil assignment practices. Our discussion centered around the experiences of Samantha Smith and her mother, Ms. Joanne Mitchell. Let me recap the conversation for the record. Arkansas. Ms. Mitchell lives at 101 Ellis Drive, Apt. N, Little Rock, ---- She is in the Central High School attendance zone. During the spring, 1995, she applied for Samantha to attend Parlcview Magnet. She was advised by the Student Assignment Office that Samantha was number (3) three on the waiting list for Visual Arts. Later, when she called the Student Assignment Office, she was advised that Samantha was number (5) five. Surprised that she could move up the list rather than down the waiting list, Ms. Mitchell inquired about viewing the list. Student Assignment told her that list was confidential and did not share it with her. In visiting with Dr. Russ Mayo about the matter, he indicated that there was nothing he could do because she was already on the waiting list. At that point she went to Dr. Williams for assistance. This occurred in April, 1995. Upon being presented the facts, Dr. Williams made the following statement: \"why don't you apply for another program?\" Mitchell indicated that the only one for which there was not a This occurred in April, 1995. Ms. waiting list was the one for Band and that her child was not interested in Band. Dr. Williams indicated that she should have Samantha apply anyway in order \"to get her feet in the door.\" Ms. Mitchell indicated that was deceptive at which point Dr. Williams indicated \"that's how you play the game.\" Mitchell indicated that she wanted to teach her child the concept of honesty. Dr. Williams indicated \"teach her the game of life in When Ms. order to get what she wants.\"Page 2 Letter to Ms. Ann Brown August 29, 1995 Ms. Mitchell did not provide a false reason, as suggested by Dr. Williams, for getting into Parkview and to date she has not received a Parkview assignment. I spoke with Dr. Williams this morning and provided him a brief synopsis of Samantha Smith's case. I asked him to check into it and to let me hear from him by the end of the day. now 11:00 a.m. and I expect to hear from him at the end of the It is day. This letter is being written for two reasons: 1) to demonstrate the arbitrariness and unfairness of the Student Assignment/Lottery system which is in use in the LRSD\nand 2) draw attention to the teaching example which emanates from the to Superintendent and extends to parents and pupils of this I intend to ask Ms. Mitchell to take a polygraph examination to verify the foregoing facts. District. She also informs me that Samantha's grandfather, Grady Smith, from Little Rock, Arkansas, was present during the meeting with Dr. Williams and heard his comments. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, John W. Walker JWW:js cc: Ms. Joanne MitchellJ u y .Ai FILED ii-S DISTRICT COURT eastern district ar wnsas SEP 2 9 1995 Cffics of D65egregai!cn Moniioiifig IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION SEP 2 6 1995 JAMES W.McL9HMACK.Cl.fiK \\ A Ml' , M.U oiew LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF j vs. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS The Joshua intervenors filed three motions which have now been resolved by agreement among the parties. The motions were for a temporary restraining order, a preliminary injunction, and to cite the Little Rock School District (LRSD\") for contempt of court in connection with student assignments at Pulaski Heights Junior High School. [Doc. # 2477.] At a hearing on August 28, 1995, the attorneys for the Joshua and Knight intervenors informed the Court that the intervenors and the LRSD had settled the matter. Therefore, the motions are denied as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED this r day of September 1995. JUDGE 5 PHIS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET IN COMPI ON ' ICE WITH RULE 5 AND/OR 79(a) FRCP ^^E^T^R^I BY 0 1A- /./ty ,\u0026gt;i hbrc/iry- ''' R liiX ( LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ASSIGNMENT OFFICE 501 SHERMAN ST. LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72202 JAN 1 199\u0026lt;j Oifice d OeseyiegaiioT! Monm MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Melissa Guldin, Office of Desegregation Monitoring Nancy Acre, Director of Student Assignment DATE: January 11, 1996 SUBJECT: Student Assignment Handbook 1996-97 Enclosed is a draft copy of our Student Assignment Handbook for 1996-97. Please review and return with your comments by January 19. Thank you. NA:pt EnclosureLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ASSIGNMENT OFFICE 501 SHERMAN ST. LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72202 RECE f-' FEB d 1990 ^-/r 9 Office of Deseflfegation Mo,wormy TO: FROM: Principals ^7^ Nancy Acre, Director of Student Assignment DATE: February 1, 1996 SUBJECT\nStudent Assignment Handbook lt'brar Enclosed you will find a copy of the 1996-97 Student Assignment Handbook. It details the process for registering students for the 1996-97 school year. A packet of registration materials has been distributed to your secretary/registrar. Although very few of the procedures have changed since 1995 Pre-Registration, we would like to call your attention to several items. 1. The acceptable racial ranges have been re-calculated (page 2). 2. Transportation will not be provided for any four-year-olds except those attending Crystal Hill Interdistrict Magnet School or Clinton Interdistrict Magnet School. 3. Retention lists must be submitted at the end of the third nine weeks and at the close of the school year. High school lists should include any kindergarten students who will be retained (page 2). 4. Do not allow anyone to complete pre-registration forms before February 6 (page 5). 5. Do not distribute OERFs to NLRSD or PCSSD students (page 10). 6. Register only those students who live in your school's attendance zone. If you have any questions concerning these procedures, please contact either Julie Wiedower or Audrey Lee at *44. cc: Assistant Superintendents Melissa Guldin, Office of Desegregation MonitoringStiinmary of the Court Proceedings of May 13, 14, 15 Judge Wright stated that she had chosen to review the settlement agreement after six years although the settlement agreement does not require such a review. She stated that the portions of the settlement agreement that trouble her are INCENTIVE SCHOOLS AND STUDENT ASSIGNMENTS. Dr. Herbert Wahlberg, an educational psychologist, testified that the extra funding and enhancements of incentive schools have failed to raise achievement scores of black children. He stated that he did not believe that incentive schools were effective in raising achievement levels anywhere\nhe stated that he did not know whether the failure was caused by poor implementation or whether the theory simply does not work. Wahlberg testified that the schools fail in three aspects: They fail to attract white children, achievement scores of black children are not raised. and the \"exotic\" curriculum is inefficiently implemented so that it harms learning. The judge asked Dr. Wahlberg if he had an opinion as to whether black children benefit from going to school with white children. He answered that the percentage of white children in the room has no bearing on what black children learn. He stated that some studies show a mild gain to black children and some show a mild harm so that his conclusion is that there is no effect. In the witness' opinion the socio-economic status of the parents has a consistent relationship with ability.Wahlberg states that there is an achievement gap between minorities and whites which is measurable on the first day of school. He states that children between birth and eighteen years only spend ten per cent of their time in schools and it is unreasonable to expect a school to bear the burden of closing the achievement. He says that it is impossible and that no school district has ever done it. Dr. Wahlberg enumerated 9 factors which affect the quality of learning: 1) Abilityprior achievement. A good reader in the 3rd grade is usually a good reader in the 6th grade. 2) Motivationcapacity to persevere through a difficult situation. A good view of oneself. 3) Ageall thi^s being equal, older students know more. 4) Amount of instructionMore homework, longer school years result in more learning. 5) Quality of instructionMastery learning and cooperative learning have more effect on achievement than desegregation. English, math, civics, history, geography, foreign languages, art and music should be concentrated upon. 6) Classroom environmentChildren should be appropriately challenged. A pleasing climate with good morale results in more productivity. 7) Home environment90% of waking hours spent there. If a child is read to, stimulated, and taken to extracurricular activities, he learns more.8) Peer groupappropriate friends and appropriate activities, particularly in early adolescence when youngsters are geared more toward friends than home, will help a child be a better student. He or she should be steered toward academic competitions, chess. ballet, etc. 9) Televisionthe more television a child watches, generally the poorer they do in school. Wahlberg was asked what he would do to help disadvantaged students. He stated that he would concentrate on learning. He stated that there is a crisis of achievement in the United States. He would assign more homework and extend the school year. He would also change methods of teaching and incorporate mastery learning and cooperative learning. Wahlberg stated that parent education programs have had good success rates. He stated that the above ideas would help the achievement of minority students more than desegregation. Wahlberg testified that the reason socio-economic factors are so important is that if a child's parents value education, have money, and are well-educated, it is more likely that the parents have a wider vocabulary, have taken the child on outings, and that the child was read to and may know his alphabet before beginning school. He stated that child is generally more motivated, will try harder, and may be healthier and miss less school. Wahlberg stated that the benefits continue as the parents go to school more often. coach their children, know other parents so can better keep up with what their child should be doing, and they reinforce what their 34 children learn. Wahlberg pointed out that Asian Americans generally do better in school than white children but not because white children have been discriminated against in favor of Asians, but because of the culture of the Orient. He stated that in that culture parents and teachers are revered, academic achievement reflects on the family. and the school year is longer with a more demanding curriculum. Dr. Wahlberg testified that up to 50% of a child's capacity for achievement is formed by four years of age. By age 8, 80% of a child's achievement in the twelfth grade is predictable. Children of low socio-economic status adjust more poorly to moving from school to school than do middle class students. In very large cities there is lots of movement between schools. particularly where there is mandatory desegregation. According to Dr. Wahlberg, the difference in racial achievement levels in all states is fairly consistent. The main reason for achievement disparity is socio-economic. The witness was asked whether establishing themes at schools helps achievement. Wahlberg stated that a heavy vocational theme hurts academic learning but a foreign language theme helps. An experiment that Wahlberg helped conduct had the following requirements for students in one group: 1) Parents signed pledge to send children to school clean and neat everyday\n2) Homework every night (teacher pledge)\n3) Principal signed a pledge\n4) Merchants contributed money for books. The children in the above group had better test scores than the children in the control group. Wahlberg said that hjgh schools have three tracks: general.vocational, and academic. Dr. David Armor, a sociologist, testified next. He stated that he has concluded from his studies that mandatory integration was not having positive effect either sociologically or a academically. He stated that mandatory busing produces so much white flight that it is ineffective as a remedy. Armor testified that much of the achievement gap between black and white children is because of the long history of segregation. but he believes that desegregation will not eliminate the achievement gap which is influenced so much by home environment. He supports Title I programs to help achievement and magnet schools to voluntarily desegregate a school district. He stated that a magnet should not be based on non-academic programs. Armor stated that he knows of no desegregation plan that he is aware of that overcame the achievement gap. He stated that the majority of the gap lies outside the school purview because the capacity to learn is formed in the early years. Armor stated that studies show that between 87%-100% of the achievement gap in 6th grade is due to home environment. When a lawyer questioned Armor as to whether the lowered expectations of teachers toward children from low socio-economic backgrounds could cause the difference in achievement, the witness answered negatively. Armor stated that the gap is there from the first, so it couldn't be caused by the teacher. Dr. Armor also pointed out that in Wilmington, Delaware, where the school district is fully and successfully desegregated, the achievement gap has stayed the same.Ie Araor testified that he does not believe that most people have a negative attitude toward mandatory busing because of racism. He stated that he thinks parents just don't believe race is a legitimate basis for assigning children to schools. Armor stated that the only school districts that have stabilized with mandatory busing plans began with a very large (80/20) white to minority ration, and were all metropolitan areas which included the central city and huge parts of the suburbs. Armor testified that most districts that began 60/40 or 50/50 are becoming resegregated because of white flight. The judge stated that racial balance requirements are \"choking\" the school districts. Armor testified that our consent decree^ requires much stricter racial balance than most districts. Armor testified that once school district becomes 70% a minority, the considerations for desegregation change. He stated that at that point a district should just try to have as many integrated schools as possible, and live with the fact that the rest are predominantly black. Armor testified that for even a voluntary plan. with neighborhood schools and desegregation options, to stabilize a district racially, there need to be some 50/50 schools or schools that are 60/40% white, or the district will become all minority. His recommendation for Little Rock is to have no more mandatory student assignments. He stated that in the voluntary plans that he has designed, all students are assigned first to neighborhood schools. He said that he tries to draw zones that make sense but may naturally integrate some schools. Thenvoluntary options are adopted such as M to H transfers, and magnet schools strategically placed in minority neighborhoods. An attorney asked Dr. Armor if it was feasible to build schools in one-race neighborhoods. He answered affirmatively if there is a growing population or other need. He stated that a district should build instead of bus\nhe wouldn't deprive a minority of a new school just because it is going to be all black. He stated if the new school was going to be all white, it could probably be integrated with M to M transfers. If the new school is in the inner city, it should have magnet programs. Dr. Armor testified that a study in Boston showed that black children have high levels of self-esteem whether they are in an integrated environment or not. Armor said that he also sees no correlation between more resources and higher achievement.Summary of Court Proceedings on May 30 Gary Orfield The judge stated that the focus of the hearings is to give evidence to the parties so that they can reach modifications. She wants the opinions of the witnesses to generate some new thinking. The judge stated that she was gravely concerned about continuing the incentive schools as they are now. Gary Orfield is a professor of education and social policy at Harvard. He is a political scientist who has studied school desegregation since the late 196O's. He started and heads the Harvard Project on Desegregation which was begun in 1992. That project studies Milliken remedies. Milliken I held that mandatory desegregation remedies must be limited to districts that could be proved to have committed discriminatory practices. Milliken II gave district courts the power to fashion remedies with the contemplation that you could solve the harms of segregation with remediation components. Orfield testified that most districts hurriedly put remedies together by educators with no significant evaluation components\ntherefore, the districts are unable to see if the remedies are effective. Orfield stated that he reviewed the planning process documents and the monitoring reports. He also visited four of the incentive schools. Professor Orfield stated that the incentive school plan has lots of severe problems conceptually. He stated that those problems are magnified by poor implementation. He testified that there were a lot of good ideas in the plan but the ideas were conceived in a rush without thinking how they would play out in actually running the school. He testified that it would be very burdensome to manage the plan\nthat the plan directs so much energy in ways that have nothing to do with achievement progress. Moreover, he stated that the complication of the plan contributes to the administrative implementation problems. Orfield commented that the plans call for very complicated after school and weekend programs along with constantly filling out forms. Orfield stated that there was no reason to expect anyone to cany out the plan. There is no clear sense of purpose because the plan requires too many responsibilities of the staff with the result that the incentive plan does not produce a strong educational product. Orfield stated that the goals for he plan are extraordinarily demanding. Professor Orfield concluded that incentive school remedies are very hard to implement, that school districts rarely succeed in doing so. He stated, however, that there are programs which, if chosen carefully and monitored carefully, are effective in helping disadvantaged students achieve. Professor Orfield testified that incentive schools should have superior staff, administrative support, and significant additional funding. He stated that if you have underachieving students, a low status community, teachers who are unhappy teaching there, and students with no future, it is unlikely to be a successful school. Professor Orfield testified that he has seen very little that has taken place in the last five years which would result in remediation. He stated that there have only been modest educational gains. Orfield stated that the plan contemplated that the process was supposed to be secondary to the outcomes. He testified that if the district only complies with a lot of the details of the plan but does not show good results, then the plan is a failure. When asked to characterize the other experts, Walberg and Armor, Professor Orfield stated that Armor has not done very much independent research and that now he works for parties in civil rights lawsuits. Orfield stated that Armor argues that only parts of a district should be desegregated because only those parts were guilty of discrimination. Orfield stated that Armor ran on an anti-desegregation platform when he ran for the school board in Los Angeles. Orfield said that Armor believes that schools dont affect the achievement of student and therefore schools do not have to provide an equal education. Orfield stated that most scholars in the field disagree with Armor. Orfield stated that schools DO make a difference and that is why everyone sends their children to the best colleges that they can afford. Professor Orfield testified that Walbergs opinions are based on meta-analysis (combining hundreds of studies and then constructing giant statistical models) instead of relying on original research. Orfield stated that this method is highly criticized in education research, but also widely used. Orfield testified that the majority of school desegregation studies are for only one year and are done in the first year of desegregation\ntherefore, Orfield concludes that the majority of the statistics plugged into the giant model are defective. Orfield stated that there is a vast pool of scholars that do desegregation research and neither Walberg nor Armor are in the pool. According to Orfield, Armor has testified that desegregation actually harms black children but he has abandoned that viewpoint. He named many other researchers who have come up with a lot of information on conditions for effective desegregation. Orfield stated that the researchers are nearly all in disagreement with Walberg and Armor. Professor Orfield said that compensation education is a very difficult task and that only a small number of programs have clearly proven results. He stated that it is very important to target those programs with good track records and specially trained persons must be used. Some of those programs are Reading Recovery\nM 444 Success for All, and Algebra Project. Some of the Title One programs are successful and some are not with no net effect from Title One.Schools with disadvantaged students and Title One programs do worse on achievement tests than less impacted schools with no Title One. Children with lower socioeconomic status are more likely to score worse on achievement tests and the converse is also true. If you want to remedy the gap due to socioeconomic status, effective schools have a clear mission, and strong leadership. Good results require extraordinary educational leadership. Standardized tests evaluate content that is not taught exclusively within a school system. Orfield testified that some lower socioeconomic children who dont perform well on standardized tests, do better when put with children with higher socioeconomic status who do perform well on standardized tests. Children need the right level of challenge and motivation. If kids are segregated, disadvantaged kids generally get worse programs and such schools reinforce social status difference. With the low level of competition, they are not challenged and they will not do as well. Professor Orfield stated that if a school has an identity as a minority school or a weak schoolit is hard to attract students. But if you could change identity AND offer a scholarship that would be a great incentive for attracting students. Orfield stated that if you put all gifted programs in poor areas, that whites would come. He stated that if all the white kids come, the school will get better programs. He also stated that all black schools can be very attractive. Professor Orfield said that a number of needed changes are immediately apparent in the incentive schoolsstructural changes that would release a lot of money. He stated that the number of schools should be examined as well as the programs that they offer. He stated that as it is the staff has too much to comply with. He stated that after school programing does not make sense-that the teachers do not want it. He said that the after school program is too expensive and that since there is no required participation, many student who need it may not get it. He stated that there should be targeted tutoring so that children who need help are identified. Orfield stated that the student educational plan takes too much of the teachers time, that there should be a better assessment to identify warning signals for students who need tutoring. Teachers should have to make a long term (five year suggested) commitment and there should be special incentives for principals. He said that perhaps one incentive school should be closed and one should be made a magnet school. Professor Orfield said that there are so many compliance requirements that the staff is unable to focus on the education of children. He stated that based on the plan and interviews with teachers and principals, there is too much pressure on teachers and principals. Professor Orfield said that there is a great deal of evidence that there is no harm to the education of white children by putting them in class with blacks . He stated that black children significantly profit when they got to school with whites. He stated that there is a significant but not large increase in achievement scores when blacks and whites go to school together. The larger gains are what happen in black childrens lives. There is significant evidence to suggest that black children are more likely to go to college if they are in a majority white high school. Most gains are from interaction of isolated children with more successful children. He stated that there is significant research to suggest that if we do certain things in class (like mutual academic projects) that these gains are enhanced with the result of higher achievement and more mutual respect. He stated that desegregation has more benefits than any other intervention. He stated that children that go to desegregated schools are more likely to live in integrated neighborhoods as adults. Separate schools lead to separate lives and separate destinies. Orfield stated that although school has a major influence, it is not more important than the influence of family. Orfield stated that some mandatory desegregation plans work well and some do not. They are usually better when they are in very large metropolitan areas. He said that the maximum education benefit from mandatory plans is when a disadvantaged, racially isolated child is bused to a majority white, middle class school from 1-6 grade. It should be substantially integrated with staff and students and with no tracking on the basis of race. It should also involve parents. He stated that the districts that have gone to neighborhood schools have extremely low achievement in the 100% poor schools, parental involvement did not increase, and white flight did not stop. Orfield stated that the United States is changing from 10% minority to the point that it will be 50/50 in the year 2025. Orfield stated that best kind of goals reflect the metropolitan community and, therefore, he is no advocate of strict racial balance. The higher the racial balance gets in a community, desegregation is more complicated and a schools racial balance must be within a reasonable range. Professor Orfield stated that Little Rock needs a magnet school with a 50/50 ratio in a developing area to get people away from going to private schools.Ir r k I 11/14/96 12:48 501 324 2023 LRSD COIIMLNICATI -^ \u0026gt; ODM Little Rock School District November 14,1996 @002/003 Kress Release More Information\nZeomee Hens. .124-2020 LRSD OrientiitioD Designed to Make 6th to 7tb Grade Transition Smooth for Parents and Students Parents of .students who are currently in the sixth grade will have an opportunity to explore rhe options for their child's educational future on Sunday, November 17. 1996. from 2\n3{) - 4 00 p.m. at Henderson Junior High School. 401 John Barrow Road. The annual Junior High Transition Meeting, spon.sored by the l.inle Rock School District (LRSD) Student Assignment Office, is designed to give parents a closer look at the eight LRSD jurdor high schools and the programs offered at each school. Each school will be given one classroom at Henderson which will be decorated to be.sT showcase their school. Principals, teachers and parents of current students will be available to an.swer questions and give prospective parents helpful information to make the transition to iunicr high sthoui a smooth one. The meeting will be followed by open house tours at the schools at 10:00 a.m, and 1 :S0 o.in. as follows: Monday. xNovember 18 Monday. November 18 .Cloverdale Junior High ITunbar International Studies/Gifted \u0026amp; 1? '' .'.La Vi'ednesday, November 20 Wednesdai'. November 20 Taler.tsd Education Magne! Junior High .Forest Heights Junior High Henderson Heaidi Science Magnet Junior 1 810 West Markham Street li iiO li i'lDors! Little Rock. Arkansas 72201 \u0026lt;501)524-2000 T f t} 4\n\u0026amp; D s e J H a I J if. I t- k' t i: Ei 11/14/96 12:49 501 324 2023 LRSD COMMUNICATI ODM 121003/003 I I fky I Press Release Transition Meeting (11/14/96) Page 2 Thursday, November 21 Thursday, November 21 Monday, November 25 Monday, November 25 Mabelvale Junior High Horace Mann Arts \u0026amp; Science Magnet Junior High Pulaski Heights Junior High .Southwest Junior High School registration uill be held January 21-31,1997. tirTr V- V. '11 I ?1 f ' 3 :i 'w? -'A \"A* .y I 5\n-97 NON SUSAN U WRIGHT FAX NO, 5013246576 P.Ol DISTRICT JLT9GE SUSaN ''AEBBER WRIGHT 600 W. C/NPiT'.A.. i.i niE RIX'K, AR 72201 JUL 101997 JLIDGE WRiQHT. u s. JUDGE SINCE JANT.LARY 1997 i HAVE BEEN V^ ORKING WITH THE LITD_E ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ON THE .STUDENT ASSIGNMENT OF CHILDREN LIVING IN THE WEST LITTLE ROCK AREA AFTER A GREAT AMOUNT' OF EFFORT \\RV LITITE HAS BEEN ACCOMPLISHED I HAVE A WHOLE LOT OF KNOftT.EDGE ABOUT THE PROBLEM PARENTS LIVING IN MY AREA ARE SO UPSFT WITH. THE STUDENT ASSIGNMENT OFFICE TOLD ME THAT OTHER AREAS OF TO'WN HAVE RECRLTTINCt MEETINGS. WELL, I TRIED THAT AND IHE ASSIGNMENT OFFICE WAS KIND .E.NOUGH TO PROVIDE ME WITH SW FLYERS AND ABOLT A DOZEN POSTERS. I WENT IX'XIR. TO DOOR TALKING TO P.ARENTS IN SANDPIPER WEST A.ND CHERRYCREEK SLEDIVTSIONS AND I P'lJT UP THE DISTERS ATTENDANCE FOR THE MEETING WAS IN MY OPEMON DlSM.-\\L. .,2 PARENTS FROM SANDPIPER \u0026amp; 3 FROM CHERRYCRETK. ALL OF THE OTHER PERSONS W.TERE FROM THE SCFEJOL DISTRICT. (THE ?. FROM ?.vNDPIPER CAME AS M\\' SLRFORT) AFIT- \"i '. \u0026lt;1 ' ' rO ICO OR so HOUSEHOLDS IN MY NE.1.GHBORHOOD I HEARD THE SAME I- R AND OVER.-T WON'T PLY MA' CHILDREN IN WILSON . IVE NEVER S rUDENT ASSIGNKLENT OFFICE, .ID PVT MA' CHILD IN SCHOOL IF raEY Il NEIO.rIBORHOOD BUT I'M NOT GOING TO PUT THEM IN WESSON....MA' . I -\u0026gt;K JI )LD WERE ASSIGN.E.D TO WILSON A.ND THEY PUT THEIR KIDS IN A Ki, ATE' .MTHOOL ^O I'M GOING TO DO TOAT TOO' .. OF ALL THE PERSONS THAT 1 7 ^(L.KED TO ONL Y 1 PARENT HAD THEIR CHILDREN IN' PUELiC SCHCXTLS AND IT WAS A magnet there . -NOT ENOUGH SPACE TO PUT .ALL THE CHILDREN IN OLTi AREA IN MAGNET SC HOOL S'SO THE ONES TB.AT DON T MAKE IT TO THEIR CHOICE OPT OUT TO PxRIVATE SCHOOl \u0026lt; -M MOST M.l. CF IHE PARENTS COMMENHED .ABOUT HOW ANGRY THEY WERE THAT F HAVE 2 SCHCK.LS LESS THAN 1 xMILES FROM OUR HOMES AND WERE NOT assigned TO THE.M .AND CANNOT EVEN APPLY TO CO THERE I .AM CVRREN FLY WORKENG WTIH THE LITll.E RCX.K SCHOOL OlS'rRlCT TO COMMLINTCATE WITH THESE P.ARENTS THAT PUHi IC SCHOOLS APE GCOD SAFE PLACES FOR OUR CHILDREN. I SINCERELY HOPE YOU'LL TAKE A GOOD LOOK AT OUR .LRE.'- AND PROVIDE. Ol R CfflLDRF '\u0026lt; '.VITI-i .A CHOICE THAT WE CAN GET THESE PARENTS TO AGREE OX N.TLDING .A NEW SCHOOL IN OLR AREA. YObR CONSEJER.a IiON OF .MY CONCERNS IS GREATLY APPRECIATED AND I lCOR FORW ARD TO GREAT THINGS HAlPENING IN 'CHE LITILE ROCK SCHCXX. DISTRICT .iRFLV 7/\n'CZ/Uy/- M.AR\\'ANNF CAMfBF.Ll, 77c(z MON 6:24 SUSAN W WRIGHT FAX NO, 5013246576 P. 03 1 * anti respond to my person via telephone or writte.u communication, I work.within the Pulaski County School District as a substitute teacner, while waiting to be placed as a secondary Engiish tsacnsr (certification by the Ark. Dept, of Education), but 1 air, also a concerne,d parent. I want to rrake sure that my son and the other black males receive justice in this matter. have a fear that they are being used as a scapegoats, simply because there is not anyone to connect to the liquor bottle alleyedly found by Ms. Clark. 1 I would appreciate my son's name being placed with the black asst, principal, instead of Mr. Allison, whom 1 feel will not properly treat my son fairly because he is a black male. I believe the Asst. Principal I am referring to is a Nr. Twilley (I apologize if I did not spell his name correctly). One final, remark, I do not appreciate the fact that Ms. C.lark fl yei.led at these students and told them to shut up when they asked for permission to speak to tell their side of the. story. We have havQ constitutJ.onal_ rights^ regardless of our age. I hops someone will remind Ms. Clar.k of this fact. It sp-.ct.fu 1 1 y submit I d ^ary rin? Anderson cc cc .Attorney John Walker Judge Susan Webber Wright Retained V.\"' t ! i V JUl M? MON 8:23 To\nFront} Ref J SUSAN W WRIGHT Kupt\nBobby ester, Mary , Artdereon, Dab Artc!e?son, This /iiatC\nr Is relevant FAX NO, 5013246576 pcssn 8fcb Grade Student, SHJH P. 02 'J. .-V to a teiephcne call I received from Prlncxpal^Sue Clark at,the Sylvan Hills Jr. High Schoo at* Thursday, Ui\u0026amp;ids the boy' s, bathroom and observed four Stated bathroom. Ms. Clark also stated tnat, she Saw Dah .With u ...d., gave him to buy a cold soda drink at school). Jr. High School at \"'-A, ''Ass- She stated Ms. Clark also a soda can in his hand (money T. At 7jj3 a...ii. . .1 dropped my. mornxng from home . i, drop my children off at .school every\" rnornxng, and .they dq not leave the school oremises for any reason. _ 1 Wa.tCxhed my son pack his backpack with his books\n^ne orixi items ,in his backpack were books, This same fact holds'trri^ for my daughter, son and my daughter off at SHJH this pencils and paper, Tammy, as well. that, she \"did not\" witness the four s..udenvS drinking.,any kind of wine, but she what was in the strawberry soda of the contents (an assumption) fr assumed\" this Is can from sniffing the remainder I was also advised by, my Ms Cl^irk (wljich she did not mention to a green liquor bottle in .the wastebasket oathroom. Eric, Lewis, au anun, not have this grse.h .bottle,and that he t.ie. soda he bought front the machine at * ' ' ' I Below Is the son my person) found __ inside the boy's aiSd a strident at SHJH, Version of my son's^ school. can attest that was drinking and I want an investigation conducted by the Superintendent's office. I ..ou judgment of Mr. Allison,' nor do I trust the judgment into\na boy's bathroom drawing a T^hdipg an .igoiated bottle inside the bathroom and on a. cohvenxent 90ap$goat.\ni feel that this the fact thfttfmy son^istblack, arid I do not trust the of a a conclusion placing is due to inside the.\nbathroom.' * ....... treatmenh of.the blackstudents , rd SO are the four other students I-have often been told that there the crenc oi.tne^biack scudents are different from the treatment of the wnite students,.and I am concerned this complaint. 1 and disturbed regarding Aafon Walker, and other black rendered at this school, and how they are followed Constantly when they go in the bathroom as a 5roup, as opposed to white students who gather in this same bathroom ahd are not followed or questioned. What is going on withan. this overall enVirotmerit or questioned. Mr. Lester, again, please (investigate this matter to its fullest }7-3-^7 Cr JUL 11 19g/ ANN BROWN OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING 201 E. MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 nro DESEGfiEGAKONMOWTOWS DEAR ANN, THANKS FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK WITH YOU CONCERNING THE OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO PARENTS IN THE WEST LITTLE ROCK AREA. ALTHOUGH WHITE PARENTS MAY HAVE MORE OPTIONS THAN BLACK PARENTS ON WERE TO SEND THEIR CHILDREN TO SCHOOL, I BELIEVE IT IS TOO COMPLICATED AND MANY PARENTS LIVING IN WEST LITTLE ROCK SIMPLY DONT WANT TO PUT UP WITH THE HASSLE THEY HAVE TO GO THROUGH TO GET THEIR CHILDREN ASSIGNED TO A MAGNET SCHOOL OR AN ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL. I PLAN ON WORKING WITH THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL SYSTEM TO PROVIDE INFORMATION TO PARENTS IN THE WEST LITTLE ROCK AREA ABOUT THE OPTIONS THEY HAVE AS YOU RECOMMENDED. I ONLY HOPE YOU WILL COMMUNICATE TO JUDGE WRIGHT THAT MORE COMMUNICATION WITH PARENTS IN THIS AREA IS GREATLY NEEDED. AND FURTHERMORE, IF YOU SEE ANY WAY I CAN BE OF ASSISTANCE TO YOU I WOULD BE GLAD TO HELP. THE LITTLE ROCK PUBLIC SCHOOLS ARE GOOD SAFE PLACES FOR OUR CHILDREN BUT WE NEED TO FIND A WAY TO REACH THE UNBELIEVERS. BEST REGARDS, MARYANNE CAMPBELLOffice cf Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 July 23, 1997 Ms. Maryanne Campbell 2623 Creekside Drive Little Rock, AR 72211 Dear Maryanne: Thank you for your recent letter. Im glad we had the opportunity to talk over the phone, and I commend you for your .zeal in wanting to recruit parents to the public schools. Like you, I believe the public schools are a good place for cliildren. I appreciate your ofter to be of help. I think one of the best ways for you to do that is to work with officials in the Little Rock School District to help make parents aware of the various options for their childrens education. When you give the districts recruiters the benefit of your perceptions and ideas, they can better serve the information needs of the community. Your interest in the educational of children is very important, and I hope you will continue to actively support our citys schools. Sincerely yours, Ann S. Brown JOHN W. WALKER RALPH WASHINGTON MARK BURNETTE AUSTIN PORTER, JR. John W. Walker, P.A. Attorney At Law 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 Telephone (501) 374-3758 FAX (501) 374-4187 RECEJVSE 11998 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING via Facsimile 376-2147 / March 31, 1998 Mr. Chris Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 2000 First Commercial Bank Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: Revised Plan LRSD Student Assignments Dear Chris: A question has arisen with respect to student assignment for which I would like your input. The question is whether white students who wish to attend Incentive or double funded schools who live outside the attendance areas of those schools be allowed to do so? This appears to be an inquiry regarding whether a minority (white in this context) pupil may transfer into another school his/her race is also a distinct minority. I have interpreted 2.3, page 3 of the revised plan to allow the Incentive schools to be desegregated. This seems to be confirmed by 3.1's preamble, i.e. \"this revised plan does not require any sudden or drastic changes to the present student assignment plan. II (p.7) If your interpretation is consistent with mine, please confirm in a responsive writing as soon as possible\nif it is not, will provide your separate determination. The matter is urgent in view of the fact that white parents may feel that they may not be able to attend Rockefeller and other schools because of the 40-60% numbers that we established essentially for the area schools. If our views diverge, I suggest we address the matter at once. STHcerely Cldh W. Walker JWW:js cc: Judge Susan Webber Wright Mrs. Ann Brown501374418? uhlker lau firm 935 P02 PPR 01 98 18:09 FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK HCRSCREL R. XRIOAT \u0026lt;|ltS-lSS4J WILUAM R. VWTTONi P\u0026lt;A. JAMES W.MOORE TRON M. CtStWAN. JA-. JO\u0026lt; 0. BClU. P.A. JOHN C. ECHOLS, P.A. JAMES A. SUTTnV. P.A. PREOERICK 9. UH9ERV. P A. OSCAR C. SAVIS. JW.. P A. JAMI9 C OLARl. J\" . P * THOMAS P LEBOtTT. P.A. JOHN BEWEV WATSON. P A. PAUL B. BENHAM 1(1. P.A. LARRY W. BURKS. P.A. A. WVCKlIPP NISBET, JI., P.A. JAMtB EoWaRO HARRIS. P.A. J. PHILLIP MALCOM, P.A. JAMCa M. SIMPSON. P.A. JAMES M lAXTQN, J. IHEPHSRS RUBBELL. hi. p a. OOHALO M. SACQN. p.A. WILLIAM THOMAS BARTER. P.A- BBRWV E. COPLIN. P A. RICHAROO TAVtOR, p.A. JOSEPH B. nuhBT. JR.. B.A. ELISABETH NOBBEM BBURRAV, P.A. CHRISTOPHES HELLES, P.A. LAURA HENBlET smith. p.A. ROBERT B- BNAFCR, P.A. WILLIAM M. aRI^PlM III. P.A. MICHAEL B. MOORE. P.A. OIANE 1. MACKtb P.A. WALTER M. EBEL III, P.A. XEWIM A. CSaES. P.A. WILLIAM A. WAOOELL. JR., P.A. A I'ARTNEIOHIP at: INDlVlQUAlS AND PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS attqsnevs at law 2000 FIRST'COMMERCIAL aUlLDINO AOO WEST CAPITOL AVENUE LITTLE SOCK, ARKANSAS 71tOI-3l3 TELEPHONE SOI-STS 201 1 FAX NO. B01-3TS-1147 April 1, 1998 lOOTTJ. LANCAOTEB. F * M, QAVLE COWLEV. P A. ROBEWT a BEACH. JR.. P.A. J LEE IffOWN. P.A, \u0026gt; JAMES C. BAWeW. HBBHV A. (.IBMT. P.A SCOTT H TUCKEW, P.A. JOHM CI.BVTQN RAMOOLPR. F.A 4UV ALTON WADE, P.A. PWrCEC QARDNCR.p.a. TOMIA P. JQMB6. P.A. OAVIO B. WILSON. P.A. JEBPNCV R, MO0RE, P.A. ANOWEW T. TURNER, P.A. OAVtd U(. WRAP, PlA. CARLA OUNAWII SPAINmOUR. P A JOHN e. SENdLE*. JR.. P.A. ALLIBdN CNaVCS WARNES. P.A. W. ohBIUTSPHCR Lawbon CREBONV D. TATLQR TONY L. WILCOX FRAN C. HICKMAN AETTV J. OCUOWy lARIARA J. WANO JAMES W. SMITH CLIRPORO W. PLUWKETT OaMiSL L. MERRINOTON ALLISON J. CORNWELL TOGO A. CRECR CllCN M. OWENS HELENE N. RaVOCR JA3Oli S. HEUGREN BUBAN N. CMILGCRS 4euwcti william J. (MlTH I.B, CLARK WILLIAM L. TIRRT WILLIAM L PaTTOn. Jh H.T, LAWIELEXE, P.A. f nitecT . |60n 370-032a Mr. John W. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. Attorney At Law 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 VIA fax: 374-4187 re: LRSD Revised Plan Student Assignments Dear Mr. Walker\nWe have reviewed the LRSD Revised Plan related to the question raised in your fax of March 31, 1998. We cannot agree with your It is overbroad to say that Section interpretation of Section 2.3. 2.3 'allow[s] th incentive echoola to be desegregated.\" Section 2.3 was intended to permit the gradual implementation of the student assignment provisions of the Revised Plan. Because the Revised Flan has yet to be approved, LRSD has assigned students for the 1998-99 school year based on the present student assignment plan. We believe this will be consistent with Section 2.3 should the Revised Plan be approved.5013744137 kWLKER LAU FIRM 935 P03 APR 31 9S 13:10 Mr. John w. Walker April 1/ 1998 Page 3 We agree that section 3,2,1 places certain limitations ' ' . However, voluntary student transfers to incentive schools. However, we believe it is premature to consider modification of section 3.2.1 until the district has adopted revised elementary student assignment zones. Even so, we will consider any proposed modification you would like to present at this time. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions. sincerely, CC! ^ohn C. Fendley, Jr. John Dr, Leslie V. Carnine (via fax 324-2146) MiRECE Little Rock School District JUL 2 7 1998 OFFICE Or DESEGREGATION MONITORING Memo To: From: Ms. Ann Brown Office of Desegregation and Monitoring Leslie V. Gamine, Superintendent of Schools Date: 07/24/98 Re: Revised Student Assignment Plan This notice is to provide information regarding the process and timeline anticipated within the restructuring and student assignment component of the Little Rock School District Revised Desegregation and Education Plan (Sections). As we approach the start of the 98-99 school year, we are also in a position whereby initial plans must be implemented toward '99-2000 and proposed transition of our schools to reflect elementary - grades K-5, middle school grades 6-8, and high school grades 9-12. At present, we are thoroughly reviewing parameters that exist in our plan to provide baseline information toward the development of newly drawn assignment zones that will be proposed. The following timelines are anticipated: July School attendance zone/baseline information is compiled and reviewed. August - September Review of proposed attendance zones with the LRSD Board of Education. The LRSD Student Assignment Work Team will be asked to reconvene. (Please note enclosure) A representative from Office and Desegregation and Monitoring will be placed on this committee (Melissa Guldin). The Student Assignment Work Team will meet weekly.October - November The proposed plan will be presented and made available throughout the City of Little Rock A series of informational announcements / programs will be provided (i.e. media / press releases, publications. Town Hall meetings, cable program presentations). The Little Rock School District will survey students and parents to seek input toward the proposed restructuring and their 99-2000 intended school assignment. November Necessary revisions and modifications in the plan will be made. RECEIVpd The LRSD will vote to approve the new assignment plan. December - January JUL 2 7 1998 Make plans for '99-2000 registration (i.e. forms, building capacities) OFFICE OF desegregation MONITO W Hold registration for kindergartners, new students, M-to-M applications. Magnet applications. Desegregation Transfer request. Employee Preference requests, and P4 students. Two of the primary individuals with the Little Rock School District that are assigned to this project include Mr. Junious Babbs, Associate Superintendent for Administrative Services and Ms. Julie Wiedower, Interim Director of Student Assignment. While recognizing this significant task, we are positive toward successfully incorporating accurate baseline data and necessary input for work team members that will prompt favorable transition. We are moving rapidly beginning to place things in motion and will communicate with you soon on our initial planning session. If you have questions regarding information that has been provided, I ask that you contact Mr. Babbs. Enclosure: Middle School Pamphlet Student Assignment Work Team (Introduction / Members) cc\nJunious C. Babbs, Jr. Julie Wiedower Page 2STUDENT ASSIGNMENT WORK TEAM NEW SCHOOLS AND AREA SCHOOLS JUL 2 7 1998 OmCEOF desegregation MONFiDRlNG 1. INTRODUCTION The Student Assignment Work Team (the Team) was requested by Superintendent Don Roberts to consider whether the Little Rock School District (LRSD) should construct new schools, and whether the school district should consider changes to its present student assignment plan. The task of the Team did not include reconsideration of magnet concepts or interdistrict schools. The Superintendent suggested that the Team specifically examine the need for, and the benefits of, constructing a new Stephens Elementary School and a school in a growth area in the western part of the city. The Superintendent also suggested that the work group consider possible changes in student assignment plans which could lead to more integration and less student transportation. The Team began meeting in late March and generally met weekly through mid-July.Student Assignment Work Team New Schools and Area Schools Junious Babbs (newly appointed) Mary Ann Campbell (newly appointed) Michael Daugherty Pat Gee Melissa Guldin Bill Hamilton Baker Kurrus J.J. Lacey, Jr. Jim McKenzie Leonard Thalmueller Narcissus Tyler Julie Wiedower (newly appointed)Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 April 14, 1999 Mr. Junious Babbs LRSD Student Registration Office 501 Sherman Street Little Rock, AR 72202 Dear Junious: Thank you for spending time with me on Monday discussing the concerns I had raised in my March 18\" letter about assigning four-year-olds at Rockefeller. Its wonderfully easy to talk matters over with you. Your openness and positive thinking is a real asset to the district and a joy to me personally. Im glad we both value the importance of preserving Rockefellers success. As we agreed. Im going to call on some creative thinkers to come up with possible options that might allow the children in Rockefellers early childhood program to remain at the school throughout the elementary years, while still accommodating the assignment zone children who have priority for attending the school. The first step toward that end is a brainstorming session next week with Anne Mangan, Pat Price, and Melissa Guldin. Then well schedule some time with you, Francis, Sadie, and Brady (or whomever you think should be involved) to talk over the ideas that have surfaced and get the benefit of the groups collective thinking. Ill keep you posted on all developments. Meanwhile, so we can work from a solid information base, well appreciate having Rockefellers latest enrollment figures for 1999-2000 by race and grade level, including the number of four-year-olds in the zone, the number of four-year-olds enrolled this year who arent slated to return, and any other figures that will help us get an accurate enrollment picture for next year. Thanks so very much for your help. Sincerely yours, Ann S. Brown cc: Anne Mangan Pat Price Melissa Guldinmi 810 West Markham Little R.ock, .AR. 72201 T. 4\n.- T, -,. A C t 1 _ 4 ^ . . ^Lxi.i.v.utiac xvcie^c July 19, 2004 For more information\nJulie Davis, 447-1027 LRSD Seeks Community Input iQ Student Assignment Flan The Little Rock School District seeks input from the community in the formulation of its revised Student Assignment Plan. For this purpose, the district has organized three community forums where ideas and opinions may be exchanged. The public is encouraged to attend these forums. Tuesday, July 20\n6:00 to 7:30 p.m. Little Rock Neighborhood Resource Center, 3805 West 12* Street Thursday, July 29\n6:00 to 7:30 p.m. Dee Brown Library, 6325 Baseline Road Tuesday, August 10\n6:00 to 7:30 p.m. LRSD Administration Building Board Room, 810 W. Markham Street The primary focus of the meetings will be the snident assignment policies for the districts specialty magnet schools (Central, Fair, Hall and McClellan high schools\nCloverdale, Dunbar, Henderson and Mabelvale middle schools\nand King, Rockefeller, Romine and Washington elementary schools). The LRSD Board of Education encourages the community ro participate, obtain information and provide input at the meetings. ###RECEnn=r LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 501 SHERMAN STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72202 OCT 6 1999 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONlTORi?a OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Junious C. Babbs, Associate Superintendent Phone: (501)324-2272 E-Mail: jcbabbsff:stuasn.lrsd.kl2.ar.us October 5, 1999 Mrs. Ann Brown Office of Desegregation and Monitoring 201 E. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Mrs. Brown: In an attempt to follow-up on earlier communication regarding possible areas that may warrant attention in the 99-2000 LRSD Student Assignment process, a meeting is being scheduled with appropriate staff persons to review projected enrollment / capacity compositions and possible strategies that may be enacted. You and / or representatives from your shop are invited to attend. We look to be in touch regarding the scheduled time. Sincerely, .^nious Babbs Date: October 19, 1999 To: Melissa and Gene From. Am Re: LRSD Meeting Attached is a communication from Junious Babbs, who has invited us to attend a meeting in the Student Registration Conference Room next Tuesday, October 26, 1999 at 9:00 a.m.. This meeting is probably to mollify me, because I have suggested that it would be appropriate to review the present student assignment zones to determine whether some minor adjustments (tweaking) might be appropriate. As you know. Ive been particularly concerned about the Rockefeller zoning, because it has created some big kindergarten enrollment numbers that could develop into overcrowding at the successive grade levels. Other schools might have similar problems, although Im not aware of them. At any rate, please plan on attending this meeting with me next Tuesday. Thanks. Enc.10/14/1999 11:20 501-324-2231 LRSD SRO PAGE 02/02 little rock school district 501 SHERMAN STRFFT LITTLE ROCK. AR 72202 OFFICE OF ADMLMSTRATIVE SER-VICES Junious C. Babbs, Associate Superintendent Phone: (501)324-2272 L-Mail: icbabbsf^stuasn lrcrf L-n October 5,1999 Mrs. Ann Brown OflSce of Desegregation and Monitoring 201 E. Markham LittleRock, AR 72201 Dear Mrs. Brown: In an attempt to follow-up on earlier communication attention in the 99-2000 LRSD Student Assignment appropriate staff persons to review projected enrollment / strategies that may be enacted. regarding possible areas that may warrant process, a meeting is being scheduled with capacity compositions and possible You and / or representatives from your shop are invited to attend. We look to be in touch regarding the scheduled time. Sincerely, inious Babbs 10/14/1999 11:20 501-324-2281 LRSD SRO PAGE 02/02 Qi little rock school district 501 SHERMAN STRFFt little ROCK, AR 72202 OFnCE or ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Junious C. Babbs, Associate Superintendent Phone: (501)324-2272 ' E-Mail\nicbabbs@stuasn lrrt kn October 5,1999 Mrs. Ann Brown Office of Desegregation and Momtorine 201 E. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Mrs. Brown: In an attempt to follow-up on earlier communication regarding oossible areas that o,,,, - strategies that may be enacted. capacity compositions and possible You and / or representatives from your shop are invited to attend. We look to be in touch regarding the scheduled time. Sincerely, L Juinniioouuss BBiabbs Message Page 1 of 1 Ann Marshall From: Sent: Rousseau, Nancy [Nancy.Rousseau@lrsd.org] Friday, October 17, 2003 12:57 PM Subject: FW: Memo from Mr. Babbs Parents - If you are interested in attending this meeting, please let me know, and you can be the LRCH delegates. Obviously, LRCH cannot have 50 parents at this meeting! I cannot attend b/c I already have two places to be during this time. I know that a great many of you are concerned about the proposed assignment plan. Feel free to get involved if you are interested. Nancy -----Original Message----- From: Eggleston, Deana Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 11:23 AM To: Rousseau, Nancy\nNorman, Cassandra\nSmith, Vernon\nBuck, Larry\nMunns, Angela\nBacon, John\nBurton, Marvin\nBlaylock, Ann\nMangan, Anne\nZeigler, Gwendolyn\nScull, Lillie\nHarris, Tyrone Cc: Holmes, Morris\nMitchell, Sadie\nStewart, Don\nGlasgow, Dennis Subject: Memo from Mr. Babbs This following message is from Mr. Babbs: This notice is to provide an update regarding proposed 2004-05 student assignment plan activity and mav where things exist for the moment. It is being pulled as an action item for the October 23^ meeting of the Board of Directors. Given recent conversation through Dr. Holmes, and respective board members, thinking is to seek expanded school/program conversation and input opportunity. This__ include members of your Campus Leadership Team (CLT), Parent Teacher Association (PTA), and/or school representatives that you 'd like to bring on board. A called meeting for principals and/or your representative is scheduled for Tuesday, October 21, 2003, 3:30p.m. in the Student Registration Office, 501 Sherman Street. In this session Dr. Holmes is scheduled to provide an overview of this charge. We will look to review background, pertinent data, our present state, anticipated timeline and availability to obtain additional thinking toward recommendation / adoption of a new student assignment plan. Look to see you Tuesday afternoon. cc: Dr. Holmes Deana Eggleston Student Registration (501)447-2955 deana.eggleston@lrsd.org Got I OOO*G of Smiling Facco for your EmoHol Gat tKam r*owl J 10/17/2003Message Page 1 of 1 Ann Marshall From: Sent: Rousseau, Nancy [Nancy.Rousseau@lrsd.org] Friday, October 17, 2003 3:47 PM Subject: FW: Memo from Mr. Babbs Parents - Sorry! I goofed! The message I sent to you about the meeting was incorrect. Tuesday's meeting is for administrators only. The LRSD will be setting up a meeting soon for parents to get information and give feedback. The October 23'^'* vote has been delayed until the November agenda meeting. I will let you all know of the meeting date when I get the information. Nancy This following message is from Mr. Babbs: This notice is to provide an update regarding proposed 2004-05 student assignment plan activity and where things exist for the moment. It is being pulled as an action item for the October 23^ meeting of the Board of Directors. Given recent conversation through Dr. Holmes, and respective board members, thinking is to seek expanded school/program conversation and input opportunity. This may include members of your Campus Leadership Team (CLT), Parent Teacher Association (PTA), and/or school representatives that you 'd like to bring on board. A called meeting for principals and/or your representative is scheduled for Tuesday, October 21, 2003, 3:30p.m. in the Student Registration Office, 501 Sherman Street. In this session Dr. Holmes is scheduled to provide an overview of this charge. We will look to review background, pertinent data, our present state, anticipated timeline and availability to obtain additional thinking toward recommendation / adoption of a new student assignment plan. Look to see you Tuesday afternoon. cc: Dr. Holmes Deana Eggleston Student Registration (501) 447-2955 deana.eggleston@lrsd.org Got I noO's of Smiling Foccs for your Emails! Get thorn nowl j 10/17/2003uo. o L K S D SRO RASE 02/02 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Student RegistAtion Office 2004-05 School Choice Option Survey I am presently affiliated with: O Wo- TjlB -Use a No.2 pencil only -Fill in bubble completely -Do not fold Or staple a. Original Magnet School b. LRSD Magnet/Specialty School c. Attendance Zone School d. No School I Strongly Disaarge No Opinion Disagree Attendance Zone are important. options outside the Neigh jorhood J__________Agree Strongly Agree School 2. It IS important that schools reflect a diverse st ident population. 3. Diversity promotes equal opportunity and bro? i experience. dens the educational 4. School choice options are desirable even if trs i provided. nsportation is not CJ '-vJ 5. Diversity should take into account factors in addition to race. 6. It is possible to have too many choice options. 7. What options Successful schools must be diverse. attendance zone? should be considered If any, to diversify asJignmentoutsIde of the 8. Random Selection (Luck of the draw) .J O I r L C O O o r 9. 10. Socio-Economic (Free/Reduced Lunch) C o Academic Proficiency (Test Scores) o o o 11. Race (Cultural Group) 12. Sibling Preference (Brother or Sister Living in tie Same Household) C.J O o For District Use Only I P S ci Parent Forums School Choice Proposal The Little Rock School District (LRSD) is proposing changes in the student assignment plan for the 2004-05 school year. The LRSD Board of Education wishes to allow parents additional opportunities to provide input before the Board makes a decision on the recommendation. Two parent forums will be held: Elementary schools: Tues., Oct. 28 Secondary schools: Wed., Oct. 29 5:30 - 7:00 p.m. 5:30 - 7:00 p.m. Location: Board Room, LRSD Administration Building, 810 West Markham. If a parent cant attend the session designated for his/her childs school level, the parent is invited and encouraged to attend the other session. The primary reason for revision of the current school assignment plan is that recent court decisions (Unitary Status / U.S. Supreme Court - University of Michigan) have affected the manner in which we assign students. Need is identified to develop a student assignment procedure where race-based decisions are no longer the sole factor in determining assignments. The plan will affect our current students only when they move to the next school level-for example, when our current fifth grade students enroll for middle school or eighth grade students enroll for high school during the January 26 - February 6, 2004 registration period. The Board of Education and district administrators remind all parents of the districts commitment toward diversity within our schools. We will closely monitor the equitable allocation of resources, including funding and personnel, in order to ensure that students at all schools have experienced teachers, appropriate materials, updated technology, equipment, and current textbooks that promote equal educational opportunity and academic excellence for all students. i October 22, 2003 Dear Specialty Magnet School Patron: You may have heard that the Little Rock School District is developing an updated student assignment plan for implementation during the 2004-05 school year. This proposed plan will be presented to the Little Rock Board of Education for review/approval on November 6, 2003. I want to share with you information about the plan and meetings that will be held to allow for additional input. Attached is a list of Frequently Asked Questions, or FAQ, providing information about the proposed plan. The plan will affect our current students only when they move to the next school level-for example, when our current fifth grade students enroll for middle school or eighth grade students enroll for high school during the January 26 - February 6, 2004 registration period. The primary reason for revision of the current school assignment plan is that recent court decisions (Unitary Status / U.S. Supreme Court - University of Michigan) have affected the manner in which we assign students. Need is identified to develop a student assignment procedure where race-based decisions are no longer the sole factor in determining assignments. The Board of Education and district administrators remind all parents of the districts commitment toward diversity within our schools. We will closely monitor the equitable allocation of resources, including funding and personnel, in order to ensure that students at all schools have experienced teachers, appropriate materials, updated technology, equipment, and current textbooks that promote equal educational opportunity and academic excellence for all students. Please read the attached FAQ. You are invited to attend one of the scheduled meetings to provide input regarding the proposed student assignment plan: Elementary schools- Tuesday, October 28, 2003 - 5:30 - 7:00 p.m. Secondary schools- Wednesday, October 29, 2003 5:30 - 7:00 p.m. Location\nLRSD Board Room - 810 West Markham Street If a parent cannot attend on the specified night for the school level, he or she is certainly welcome to attend the other session. I encourage you to provide your input on either of the scheduled evenings outlined above. Sincerely,b a 2004-05 Proposed School Assignment Plan Frequently Asked Questions Why is the district proposing a change in the student assignment plan? The primary reason for revision of the current assignment plan is that recent court decisions (unitary status / U.S. Supreme Court - University of Michigan) have affected the maimer in which we assign students. Need is identified to develop a student assignment procedure where race-based decisions are no longer the sole factor in determining assignments. What guided the proposal being presented to the School Board? A survey was done of more than 1000 stakeholders (parents, staff, community) representing every school in the Little Rock School District. More than 85% of those responding (535) agree that School Assignment Options outside the Neighborhood School Attendance Zone are important. Additionally, 90% felt that It is important that schools reflect a diverse student population. In addition, the district Strategic Plan Mission Statement (developed by members of our community) states that our schools should not only reflect, but embrace, diversity. Our School Board has been equally clear in its Covenant for the Future which was adopted in February of 2001. Will attendance zones be changed? No Will there be significant student movement as a result of proposed changes? No. Approximately 90% of LRSD students attend their attendance zone school, stipulation magnet, or participate in the M-to-M program. Will the Stipulation! Original Magnet (Parkview, Mann, Booker, Carver, Gibbs, Williams) assignment process change? No. These schook will continue to operate under the current assignment plan. Two meetings are scheduled for additional input from parents and other community residents. They are: Elementary schools - Tuesday, Oct. ZS** 5:30 - 7:00 p.m. 5:30 - 7:00 p.m. Secondary schools - Wednesday, Oct. 29**\"Location: LRSD Board Room Administration Building 810 West Markham Please invite your thinking and input. WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 11,1993 LRSD hired former official to draw up alternate plan The short-handed Little Rock School District turned to an old ally recently. The district hired Dr. James Jennings, its associate superintendent of desegregation from 1987-92, as a consultant July 27 to write an alternative student assignment plan. He was paid $1,381.25 for his services, a district spokesman said Tuesday. The district has a desegregation office, plus a number of staff members who work in its student-assignment section. Jennings was a temporary addition to that department. His job was to develop a student assignment plan to use if U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright had refused to close Ish Elementary School. Wright Oversees the Pulaski County school desegregation case. Jennings student assignment plan was built on the premise f that the judge would require the district to operate Ish and the nearby Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary School in the same 1993-94 academic year. But Wright ended up accepting the districts proposal to close Ish and let the students attend King, so the district scrapped Jennings plan. The new King school is scheduled to open Aug. 23, the first day of classes. As a district employee, Jennings gained experience writing student assignment plans for the district. He is now teaching at Hendrix College in Conway.FRIDAY, MARCH 12, 1993 9B LR district delays assignment of 12,000 to elementary schools BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazette Education Writer The 1993-94 school assignments for as many as 12,000 elementary pupils in the Little Rock School District have not been completed and were not mailed as scheduled Thursday. Marie Parker, associate superintendent for organizational and learning equity, said Thursday that the need to establish an attendance zone for the new King Interdistrict Elementary School has caused a slight delay in sending out assignments to the districts elementary schools. The only exceptions are the elementary magnet school assignments, which have been mailed. Junior high and senior high school assignments were mailed Thursday as scheduled. Parker said she did not know exactly when the elementary assignments will be mailed. A proposed attendance zone for the new King School at Ninth Street and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Drive has been developed, she said. That proposal has been submitted to the superintendent and the districts attorney, who will pass the proposal on to the other parties in the 10-year-old Pulaski County school desegregation lawsuit and to U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright for approval. Also, community meetings are being planned for next week to allow members of the public to review the proposed zone boundaries for the new school. Parker said it is necessary to establish the King zone so that children who live in the zone can be assigned to the new school when other school assignments are made. Otherwise, children might be assigned-to one school now, only to have their assignments changed once the new zone is approved. 1 King is supposed to serve children who live in the area of the school, as well as white children from the Pulaski County Special School District who volunteer to attend the school. . The school, which is to be completed by mid-July, will accommodate about 700 children and will have a special academic theme. A district commit- tee has interviewed candidates for principal of the school. Nei- ther the principal nor the theme of the school has been selected. Arkansas Democrat ^(gazette THURSDAY, JUNE 5, 1997 West LR neighbors to meet, size up idea of single school ARK.-\\NSAS DEMOCR.-\\T-GAZErTE West Little Rock parents who I want to learn more about their public schools will have the oppor- [ tunity to speak with Little Rock School District officials this i evening. ' School district parent re- ' cruiters from the Student Assignment Office will meet with parents today in the Books-A-Million party room at 12201 W. Markham St. from 6 to 7 p.m. Maryanne Campbell, a resident of the Sandpiper Creek subdivision, organized the meeting to rally her neighbors behind the idea - of sending their children to a sin- i gle school, in effect making it their neighborhood school. Most children in the Sandpiper Creek area off Bowman Road south of Kanis Road are in the attendance zones of Wilson or Dodd elementary schools. In fact, Camp: bell said, very few of them attend either one, with many opting out of the public school system altogeth-. er. I dont think its normal for kids to have to go to private, schools, but its an accepted norm here, Campbell said. Unless we imite, nothing will change. Becky Rather, one of the school districts two full-time parent recruiters, said that children from- this part of west Little Rock are scattered through Wilson, Dodd,' magnet and private schools. WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 15, 2003 5B |Parents question diversity plan at forum zone boundary lines for the BY CYNTHIA HOWELL ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE A proposal to lessen the role that race plays in student assignments to some Little Rock magnet schools may be intended to promote diversity, but it has the potential to create more one-race schools, parents told district leaders Tuesday night. About a half-dozen parents attended the forum at the districts administration building on proposed changes to the assignment plan that could go into effect next school year. That plan, if adopted by the School Board on Oct. 23, would take into account a students standardized test scores and family income level, in addition to the students race, in creating a mix of students in the districts 12 special-academic-program or magnet schools that have attendance zones. Thats different than the current system in which race is the main consideration in attempting to achieve a particular mix of students at each of those schools. Delaney Fleming, a black parent, questioned how relying on family income and test scores could lead to diversity in student enrollment when black families are typically poorer than whites and black children on average have lower test scores than their white classmates. He said the two new criteria reinforce racial differences. What safeguards will be instituted to ensure that the plan wont resegregate the schools? Fleming asked. What steps will be taken so schools in the western part of the city wont become predominantly white while the schools in the test of the district will remain or become predominantly black? Junious Babbs, associate superintendent for administrative services, said a new plan is necessary because the district has been declared unitary or desegregated by the U.S. District Court in terms of its student assignments to schools. The district cannot continue to use race as a basis for assignments without that being considered discriminatory. TTie district has the option of assigning all students to schools based on the attendance zones in which they live, Babbs said. About 70 percent of districts 25,000 students already go to their attendance zone schools while 10 percent attend the attendance-zone magnet schools. However, district leaders decided to keep schoolchoice options after getting the results of a community survey that showed 90 percent of parents and school staff said diversity is important in schools and more than 80 percent favored school choice. Babbs agreed that the district, which is now 69 percent black, may end up with more one-race schools. But district leaders will monitor schools to prevent the inequitable distribution of resources among them, he said. Debbie Carreiro, a white parent at Dunbar Magnet Middle School, said giving top priority to students living in the attendance zone will likely leave few seats for others to transfer to Dunbar for its unique gifted education and intematioii^ studies programs. Her own family selected attendance-zone magnet schools years ago when her west Little Rock attendance-zone school was too full I hit all the negatives in the Little Rock School District and found a positive, she said. The proposed assignment plan wont change existing attendanceschools. Nor would It affect the way students are assigned to the six original magnet schools Parkview High, Mann Middle, and Booker, Carver, Gibbs and Williams elementaries which do not have attendance zones. Students now attending the attendance-zone magnet and specialty schools will be grandfathered, or be able to continue attending those schools.O c t o b 8 r 3 0. 2 0 0 3 1 CD oo CD u !/\u0026gt; co X u 3 tf) o !Z) OD CZ3 s g I/) o ap:: o C g b s !3 0-3 e CO s G 03 03 z: \u0026lt;0 s g^ M I 13 .S' SO\n S P \u0026lt;U C *3 .2- OJ -S aj *3a-i.3 QJ fl) fl S\" - 00^ Q.-5 o \" 2 W O 3 (U -2 S tUn boO Gc I, 9P^ 'J X e 3\u0026gt; C SJ2 e w J3 3 J g r A \u0026gt; 0 ) G, 2 G Oe 5 C s C S p-S^cgS iJ-Ss p o.-a ? u tS .S bn I \u0026gt;. G \u0026lt;U C *3 O U n) fi U U X U ' uIS*3 Eg UI-O'S.^ 2I :s g 35 M s o s g 2UD PO3 ngj utj- SflrSis o \u0026lt;U U p Tun nof O V proposal stands, all lawsuits, he said. IldllOlCl children who apply to go to mag- net schools that have attendance tor, just not the only factor, as Continued from Page 1B zones would be put into the ap- the result of a U.S. Supreme ifications, but isnt the fact that plication pool. But students who Court order last summer on Student race can still be a fac-you have this plan running more differ the most in terms of admission decisions at the Uni-whites away from the school dis- race, academic achievement and versity of Michigan law school, trict? asked one black audience family income from the stu- Babbs said. Although the case member. dents living around the schools centered on a specific law Russ Carter, a parent of two would be given preference in the school, the decision is viewed in district students, urged Junious selection process. In other legal circles as having implica- Babbs, an associate superin- words, their names might go in- tions for admissions procedures tendent for the school district, to the pool more times, giving in other education systems, and others to adjust the pro- ^ejn a greater chance of being The change in the Little Rock posed system so the magnet and ^dpjnly selected for the school, assignment plan is being prospecialty schools can retain their 'JS jfiiue Honeycutt, whose chil- posed for next school year even current racial ratio goals of 60 dren attend King Elementary, though Wilsons order on unipercent black and 40 percent said the proposal is an attempt tary status is being appealed to white. to prevent the district from fac- the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Ap-, Gina Parker, another parent, ing another 30 or more years in peals and state lawmakers are on o. \u0026gt;\u0026gt; s\nJ VI y VaI ? j= o .g .2 o o. .w cflTSflwi^O.S- ^-5543.2. G 13 o G D3 i:\n3 13 IK 3 13 3 2^ \"G _fl j_i Ui .y o .5 Q c-T GSg 3 2 \u0026lt;U 2 .G crt *3 aj ftO ' .eg5 2 \u0026gt;1 Cm \u0026lt;D ..Q tc aczj \u0026lt;9 - g G S G 5 n SP-E g \u0026gt; .G G-- G S - B S's -n I\" .17) o also asked for some assurances court. the brink of meeting in a special about the racial make-up of the Ann Marshall, the federal de- legislative session to consider i schools under a new plan. Mt E Da 3-2 3 s S* G O .G ,0 -G efl E G S'S*\" 2 S 7 .3 K'S \".a u n '2 o o V. SS rt O D3 W \u0026gt; .y fS e O V) 73 .!U c xj .5 U O O 3 2 tUJ {UJ JI3- Q_ 2 Ui fl tuf) ^3 o 3 G G X D C iZ)/3GGa)gJ'(UC^X 'U'^_ .w cfl*- E spa P H 2 \"73 S' S?-2 it li nJ uJ G m flj fl /i _ hG G S bfi O D3 d U u u \u0026lt;D r\u0026gt; G-XJ j3 no c/: .3 lA O oO u\u0026lt;ut /()/) 5 O nJ X b i- 9(/-) u -o) *o oo ca G O 132 4G= S J a 2 c E (Z)y) 13 I Im yj G 13 G jj:\n- - - tZ) Q segregation monitor in Pulaski a range of education reforms, in- I dont want to see us back County who said she was at- eluding the way school districts where we were [with racial seg- tending the session as a district are funded. regation], Parker said. Is there parent, said the fed-e--r-a-l- -c--o-u--r-t-s Pressed by a parent at the some middle ground where we arent actively forcing the school Tuesday session about why the could have 60/40 split without districts to abandon race-based hurry to change the system when making race the sole factor? Is school assignments and that an there are so many uncertainties, there a way to design that? alteration now might be prema- Babbs said it was being done on LeRoy Mayfield, a black par- ture.--------------------------------- the basis of research and legal ent who lives in southwest Lit- Babbs said at both forums advice. : tie Rock and has children at this week that the plan would af-ra Parkview and Central high feet the 10 percent of district stu- g I schools and Williams Magnet El- dents who typically opt for trans- signment process,\" he said. The , ementary School, complained fers to the 12 affected magnet legal decisions indicate to us that I that the proposal is too compli- schools. The district could go to we must change. We are step-csted. a strict attendance zone olan. nine out on that Snnreme Cmirf We would be ill-advised to retain our present student as- . a strict attendance zone plan, phig out on that Supreme Court This is totally confusing, he Babbs said, but results of an Au- ae^isjon. :S 5 \"y S u 5P o \u0026lt;u ! c ts .G C.2 o o c t, c J2 _ 2 o \" X o tn .. O \u0026gt; u 0 w 2 N o on u .^\"0 \u0026lt;u 2 3 P -G G *' c5 E 5 \u0026lt;D (Z) I \"Gd= 2 0 X Ss o (/) E h 2 ^12 \u0026lt;/) S 1 _M_M. ['/5) *- 3 G \"G fl c OJ G O U *0 U \"O u said. In laymans terms, how can gust survey sHbwed that over- 'iTh'^ School Board was ini- I get my son into, say, Dunbar? whelming percentages of par- tially scheduled to vote on the Babbs said that under the cur- ents and employees believe stu- changes Oct. 23 but delayed a rent system. Mayfields child is dent diversity and school choice vote until Nov, 6. ineligible to transfer to Dunbar are important. Board member Baker Kurrus because only whites can trans- Babbs has repeatedly cited told parents Tuesday that he is fer from another attendance court orders as the reason for up in the air about what the zone into Dunbar. Mayfields making the proposal. district should do child can still apply to the dis- One of those orders was UU..SS.. I think there is a chance tricts six original magnet schools District Judge Bill Wilsons Sept, we wont do anything this year, unaffected by the proposal sys- 13, 2002, decision declaring the Kurrus said. There is a risk in tem. Those are Parkview, Maim, Little Rock district unitary, or doing that, but there is a chance Carver, Gibbs, Williams and desegregated, in most areas of it wont change. The Sth Circuit Booker magnet schools. its operations. The district has could rule tomorrow that this Wilma Hill, who is raising her spent the past 40 years under district is not unitary. What grandchildren, said education court order trying to achieve a would be most productive quality has to be the main con- racial mix of students in schools, would be for you to communi-cern of the district but also ob- Once unitary, a district cannot cate with your board members served that the proposed as- make race-based school assign- not what you think about all of signment system offers some ments without risking accusa- this but how do you think it hope of diversity. tions of discrimination in new should be. M O HM jS rSa? G[fl suz U U a X U E 3 _ flj O u L 2 \" 5 U* O \" 73 -c c E \u0026gt;-B 5 S SS Ovio.SranjU.SpQ e SO O' O. C _ oS\"G y) arot abjf*l'^i p53 S P-G- C0 05 2-g.S S 1 S \u0026gt;,5 o.i cc-^.aocc^ \u0026lt;\u0026lt;ySN_gMQ.2Sr uu .1 ufc 3 a 5.: W C \u0026lt;u Q V) \"O G g *CH C CZTJ f-flj .3 O 3 N di nj -3 1^2 E O o M-s g 2 g u S*-5 3 G 2 (/\u0026gt; o o CM (D E (D o z LR board tom on factoring in students race Assignment plan eludes panel Race Continued from Page IB The desire by some board members to eliminate race from the assignment process puts the district at odds with parents, Berkley initially motioned to approve the policies that would have created the framework for the new assignment plan. Strickland seconded the motion but later expressed reservations. Day asked Strickland to withdraw her second to the motion, causing the motion to die and no new motion was put forward. \"I was counting in my head, and I think the vote [on the revisions] would have been 3- 3, Day said later. That would not have done anybody any good. This is so important. Its a lightning rod of an issue. We \u0026gt; ............... ------ .need to be unanimous or close even in a diminished role is The other schools are Hall, Junious Babbs, the associate su- to^t Sharply divided over unacceptable as it would give Chris Heller, the districts at- whether race should be a factor some preference to white stu- Cloverdale, Mabelvale the ch^ges in the assignment torney, warned the board that , r.. AA A 1. . flv ..X. _ J__x__. J__x____ ,1 . fl, flx XJ A fl.ff.y.xM ... r.1 r. T^l 9 3X7 9 n CT 73 73-17* 17 . . . x . The proposed plan calls for employees and community family income and test scores members who responded over- to be considered, along with whelmingly in favor of school student race, as factors in per- choice and diversity in a district mitting students to transfer out survey in August. of their neighborhood schools That was validated by par- to go to any of 12 magnet or ents attending a series of three special-program schools such public forums on the plan in teas Central High, Dunbar Mag- cent weeks. net Middle and Martin Luther In the public sessions, race BY CYNTHIA HOWELL ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE continued reliance on King Jr. Magnet Elementary was the factor on which there schools. was the most agreement, said Fair and McClellan high perintendent who is overseeing I in making student assignments dents over black students for Henderson middle schools\nplan. They wanted to go back .......auigiuuciit v.ci Miduik biuucnts lor ----, -----.-----\"z7\n---------------: i . ' , to certain magnet schools, a transfers to the special-program Romine. Washington and to using race alone, stymied Little Rock School schools. Rockefeller elementaries.---------------Several of the parents at the Board made no decision Thurs- Im all for promoting di- Those schools serve students forums said they feared the diday on proposed assignment versity [at the magnet schools] their surrounding neighbor- minished reliance plan revisions that would put but I dont think it is appropri- hoods most of which are pre- would result in some of the the district into compliance with ate to use race as a classifica- dominantly black but also ac- magnet schools becoming vir- federal case law. tion, Kurrus said. It punishes transfer students from else- tually black while other schools The boards failure to act some people because of their where in the city. Virtually all would become predominantly , marked the second time in two race\nit promotes some people white. weeks that it has delayed a de- because of their race, and I think have been white. Babbs said the assignment cision on changes to the as- hs time to put that behind us. signment plan. The delays are Im very concerned about using beginning to hamstring districts race as a diversifier, even for preparations for the 2004-05 reasons we think are good. I pre-registration period that be- think were making a mistake. gins the last week in January. Board members Sue Strick- , . Additionally, district leaders land and Mike Daugherty also and income as including the districts at- said they were unwilling to vote **hnhibtv tnr c. torney say that a failure to for the plan because of the con- change the existing system of tinued use of race as a factor, assigning students to schools while board members Larry based solely on student race Berkley, Tony Rose and Bryan makes the district vulnerable to Day favored it. Board member accusations of discrimination Katherine Mitchell, who has and new lawsuits. been critical of the plan, missed But board member Baker the meeting. of those students to this point whitCA on race its The proposed revisions proposal was prompted by the would enable all students to ap- districts release last year from ply for transfers to a special pro- federal supervision of most of gram school, but more weight its desegregation efforts and by would be given to students a U.S. Supreme Court decision whose race, achievement level that said race cannot be the sole measured by factor in school admission deeligibility for subsidized school cisions. meals would provide the Its a unique approach.\" Day most diversity in a school. In said Thursday night about the other words, the names of those district proposal. \"Theyve tried students would go into the pool jq protect what we have, yet of applicants more often giving conform with the law. It's im- them a better chance of being pedant to me to protect what selected in the random lottery, have been working on for so Kurrus said the proposed plans See RACE, Page 5B long without ending up back in court. there is a legal risk of new lawsuits if the assignment system is not changed. I think given the state of the law and our goals this is probably the best we can do. Weve tried to follow the Supreme Courts guidance. Other (^stricts are in the same situation trying the same kinds of things. Asked about eliminating race from the assignment equation and relying just on farnily income and student test scores for diversity in schools, Heller said there is a significant overlap between students of low income and black students, \"but you would have less racial diversity if you took race out ... maybe 15 to 20 percent less racial diversity. Rose said Thursday night that he expects the board to discuss the issue again and attempt to make a decision by the boards next meeting, Nov. 20.April 2 3. 2 0 0 4 11 to study pupa assignment plan ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE Mike Daugherty, a Little Rock School Board member, and Ju- nious Babbs, the Little Rock School Districts associate superintendent for administrative services, will co-chair an U-member committee charged with recommending a long-term student assignment plan for a dozen of the districts magnet and other special-program schools. School Board President Tony Rose announced the names of the committee leaders and members Thursday night. The committee will likely conduct one or more public forums before making a recommendation on a plan to the School Board, possibly as soon as mid-June, Rose said. Faced last fall with some legal issues that made a change in the old assignment plan necessary, School Board members struggled with the issue before settling in December on a one- year plan for 2004-05 only. The board agreed at the time to form a committee to make recommendations on an assignment plan for future years. The assignment-plan changes affect those special-program schools other than the citys six original magnet schools that were initially designed to attract a racially diverse student body even if students didnt live in a schools surrounding neighborhood. Some of the affected schools include Central and Hall highs as well as Dunbar Middle and Martin Luther King Jr., Elementary schools. As the plan has been changed for the coining year, diversity in student achievement and family income are considered along with student race. The temporary plan carries no guarantees that the enrollments at the affected schools wont become virtually all black while others become largely white. The committee members are Lisa Black, Tom Brock, Jody Carreiro, Tommy Hodges, Duane Jackson, Mallory JeweU, Freeman McKindra, Stephanie Purifoy, Jan Vasques, Alma Viscarra and Carol Young.August 2 5. 2 0 0 4 Group demands LR halt assignment plan School district panel stands by changes 75 00 to ft 73 P o y3 y y) fcj C 3'cR 2. yT y\u0026gt; n - 0 3-^ 3 CL O 5 Ts' as BY CYNTHIA HOWELL ARKANSAS DEMOCRAMAZETTE A local activist group Tuesday called on Little Rock School District leaders to slow the train down on developing a new student assignment plan for 2005-06 so officials can get more public input on a new plan and find ways to improve some neighborhood schools. The Concerned Citizens United, which formed earlier this year to advocate for students who organizers say are underserved, made the demands at a news conference outside the districts Student Registration Office. District leaders worked over the summer with a 13-member citizens committee to formulate a new assignment plan for 12 specialty program schools, including Central High, Dunbar Middle and King Elementary, which are popular with students and parents. The committee is expected to put the finishing touches on its proposal over the next several days so it can be presented to the School Board in early September. Terence Bolden, chairman of e Concerned Citizens United, said Tuesday that more legwork needs to be done before any new plan is enacted. He urged the district to hold more public forums on assignment plan issues. Three forums were held in the summer, but community members who might have otherwise attended i were likely distracted by vacations and not necessarily focused on school-related issues, he said. Additionally, he said district leaders and the committee should include measures in the new plan to improve the quality of education at individual neighborhood schools, 'We believe the student assignment plan cannot be looked at alone, Bolden said. Teacher assignments to schools and the quality of education provided at neighborhood schools should be part of the approach to developing a long-term scheme for student assignments that the community at large can sup- See PLAN, Page 5B ys yj S' o' 5- y\u0026gt; fO w \"t: ... 2 CT 3 - \u0026gt; P ni 2 3 o- n2\u0026lt;^ftO'**a3F 2 5 as :: o 13 S-- ft S'- - 3 ft='\u0026lt;(ren ooeg-Q Stj *- Z^x5?3 to^^3S^ O ra i gra J-g ig O S 1'5? HS: ft C c 3 \u0026amp; -r, O C 73 -t as r'e.S \u0026gt; \u0026lt;5 - a- ~ c \u0026lt; -. S 3 in O o c r* ys ft y as 2 S to 73 fB 3 n as n o = 2 5 g 5 CL 73 I ft ft era \u0026lt; y\u0026gt; m ft ft (JQ as =! a.: LOCjq \u0026amp;3 TJ ft c - 2 3- S Z 3^ ft\nrt O yi ft 5 O tT ft 5^ c 13**' BJ c n * 3 c 2 ni 03 ft yi ifS S c - . 3 c S 2 2 o o 2 ft 325\"-.8S3 \u0026gt;3-2.5^rt'3S2' 2 73 E 7) Q c ft O' 3 ft 75 TJ as as Q 3 = 3 3 ft 2 o = S' 2. -Sn^'S- 73 O as Q. ^3 3 T3 0} co a\u0026gt; I ai CD = s: Sie'S Y P ft ft 73 o 2 a . s ft as 7Q : 3 73 5 ft c-c ft cu o O O 3 T* ft C. 2.73 TJ CL 0 ST to y) 2- 03 C/i ft ft CT.'S \u0026lt; ft = 2.S S\ns g-i g\"? i\n= 5. - ^2. 3 . 8 ?g-g'E.2.ra3ra o n \"o'g = = 5 e= 2.Sirs -S S'\" \u0026lt; ! n-? c. 5 E-\" = . ra ~!,312 ra\":ot! ci-5- ra 05 3- -g-o s 2 =-3 o re Si : ft 3 CL 2 ni no 2. w 2 O 3 3 ft O J. 03 O as f? \u0026amp;} ,7' w 1/3 ft as ? 3 ft \u0026amp;3 3 ft o 2 cn yj H rt, rt . in CL as 3-3 u 3 K' 03 = 5' 3 S' no 7 3.2: =r s g1^=SS 3 rt- 75 CC 3* Bi ------------- ft\u0026gt; a. 2. to CT to to 7= rt. Lf ft = 3 3 rt* -3 3 CT* \" ri'ftrt. oSl-^ns: clOv3 3 3 cl2 rzT K 2 g S w alS y] y\u0026gt; irt cC \u0026amp;} y3 3 n ft b3 y) 3 S g -CT o 2 3 ft CT O 3 O O 3 ft rt- -1 I 73 to ft it \"O 71 rj 73 O __ 3* C n. 3 o x. 2 n DT- fn as o Z75'?2 05 O S3 ft 3\u0026gt; ft ft CD C CL O as 0 2 = 3 .2 OS a cr as \" ft 1 Bs t/s as 3 as C- .^2 o o ? * S. 75 3 C . 73 O 75 O (re N 3 c =r i 3\n? = fl,^ y) 2. cn fc X BS 7) as as 3* to 3- 2 W5 cr fh O. o C CL. ftrtto 'F' \"'\"2b -S-S 3 :g,a o 3 3 S-=S!?.' = 3.03 2 c 2. . 3. 5. CTO n = s'i = \"rag 5'2 5 O TJ ft XJ o / y3 - a. o 5:3 = GO f Zt. r- = 75 as 03 o Cl - ..c ~ - as 3- O 5. ft = C/t = \u0026gt;5 ETTft 3 3'\u0026lt; - n 3. r. '\u0026lt;^3f6gn\u0026gt;3to S \" a- m g W - ft O CD CL 2 c^c to X- ft 3. ft ft w 3- 3t\n as c S-o^ B, Q 73 JU 3 rt ** r*. i ? ft ft S\nra g'o 3 = o.ra QQ Cl d . ft to ft to Q 3 73 S g S m 3 3* O CLj^ ft r I O 2 to CT S CL 52. O CL as x\nft 7) f\u0026amp; f^ ZT* 3* to 2- 2 BS 75 ^eng ra S -^5 ra g 2 g 3-'.. .nSS^gns- ^g O J erg 3 2. to LS yj ... 5'0'g ra o M ^n?-gS.g3 ra3\"?ra. gNSa.wg$g.3Ci. :Lsra_oggS5a.5-3o^3,^gSre. = ^o = w = ra5S!iire35a. gg$3craaQra-'\u0026lt;_ = raTO'Orj_-, sSraJ'ra^ _3_ \" 2=-S-.re-nig^o0 2 3. N 75 to o 2 CTrt. ^30^\n^ \u0026lt;5 ft Ti ft 7) -\"Cre 3 \u0026lt; ft 5. ft ft - ra -? S S S == 2 S^ra-2 o H re 5 nJS.-3 3: ft 2.cre to ? s. ft a. {/) ft 3 2 3 ft 2. O O 5 S\n 2 S - as Cl O ft as ft Q. O !=L 3\" 3 3 ft Cro 2 ra ys 0 X, a K.1 \u0026gt;-t cr ft 3. N o 2. (T 2 5 ft 3 73 ft ft CL C n as 7) c o *2 3 to a\u0026gt; . uj 3 3 n. n n\u0026gt; rt. ft 73 3 Tftft*i^7)30 2.2 11, 5 ft C - 73 ZT ft ft 3 3 = ys y) zi BJ o .. 03 y\u0026gt; = 3 S 3 BS CL Q- \u0026lt; o ere \u0026lt; -2. r m '75 5 O . \u0026lt; \"J ft 2. 3 S \"I 3- 5 5 w \" 3\" _ 7) 0 75 ft 0 ft ft 3. 3\" ft S-i :eS'3 5 ?E2?_Xin3ra - re o \" 3' 7- ? ,2 5 Q- 73 ft 73 3 -ere ft S \u0026lt; 3:' 2 2 == fS nJ \" w 2_ y, \u0026lt;2wto3^2a''' 2-~cl\u0026lt; c c 3 \u0026lt; I fp I fD r.* f5 rtf f5 3 O CL - 22 - '5 to L CX.2 ft = S 'E- S S -U as ft r ft as as n ZTs \u0026gt;1 i 3 ft 3 7 \" ra . T* ^T* f5 o \u0026lt; ra 3 Z = 5' 2.- o * n '*3 73 ft O o as Bi 3 X 2 O 3 O C ft CTO rt 8 tw rt 2 tj S-\" ? era 5 \"o' (/3 3 ere 3\" ?r i\n: \u0026amp; 2 g-s o '' 3 as -.3 3 rt. to ft 3 yi ft ~ --------re 3 3 ft yi O ? ? w O O S ns a. 3. as ft as 3 2 Q to fD a. 3 n ~ S 3\" ra p 3' o'grs = r ft 3-G.3-3 ' rt 2rt^a5ftrtf/3 rtto(-t73l-|rtCl,3^U^y)^^ft ~'rt^as. 73rttoJr373^2 rt 2 BS K b 7) O 2 T3 3 fB Cu as 7) 3 O Si f^ 73 \u0026gt; _, - to 3* O 75 2. M 7 to ft n to 3 O = =25 o o W ra a. c to o ft - as ft ft CL Si X' O ft O ft 3 Vi C\u0026gt; 3* O 3- Z ft ft 3 o ft ft o *\u0026lt; O- to 2.3 * 3 ft CD . cl' 2 ao w 3-ra 8 5 o ra K SiO - 3 85 Si 3. 2 're' - ra - - - 5 s ra as 3 73 Z o 5 c 3 ft ft CL 3 n Q ft o 7)\n S era 2^22 :Z' 3. S. ftrt rt. 3-^ 2 2 o hi zrt 73 M . r \u0026lt; 3* I 1 ft I O I ft ft 2. re 3* 75 to ft ** 73 ZC-' s a.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1183","title":"Little Rock School District, personnel directory","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["2000/2001"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","School administrators","School board members","School employees","School management and organization","School principals","School superintendents"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District, personnel directory"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1183"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\ne: /4w LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ZONE NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE TERM l Katherine Mitchell l 605 Welch St. 375-6957 (h) 2002 Little Rock, AR 72206 370-5255 (o) Pr~s,d~t- 2 Michael Daugherty 21 OJ S. Martin 664-3143 (h) 2001 Little Rock, AR 72204 e-mail: mdaugh@virtualhosts.net 370-3580 (vm) 3 Judy Magness 708 Hall Drive 666-0923 (h) 2003 Little Rock, AR 72205 Stt ,.t.. f-o.. ,. '-/ e-mail: jmagnes@ibm.oet 4 H. Baker Kutrus 10816 Crestdale Lane 224-4154 (h) 2001 LittleRock, AR 72212 376-3300 (w) V,u_ Pr~ st de\"+- e-mail: bkunus@aol.com 5 Larry Berkley 14005 St. Charles Blvd. 225-7377 (h) 2002 Little Rock, AR 72211 296-3254(w) e-mail: larry@carti.com 6 Tony Rose 8109 Mellwood 568-7587 (h) 2003 Little Rock, AR 72204 569-3122 (w) e-mail: tonyrose@ce1.net 7 Sue Strickland 19 Peartree Place 455-1843(h) 2003 .. Little Rock, AR 72209 e-mail: terreJl@aristoUe.net 0/18/2E:100 08:48 3242032 LRSD 2000-2001 BOARD MEETING DATES MONTH AGENDA MEETING REGULAR MEETING * {lti!msDKe) **(Items Due) July 07-13--00 07-27-00 *(07-11-60) **(07-24-00) August 08-10--00 08-24-00 * (08-0B--00) **(08-21-00) September 09-14-00 09-28--00 *(0~12-fJO) **(09-25-00) .:24 October 10-12-00 10-2:00 * (10--10-00) **(10..23-00) November 11:-02--00 1H6:00 *(J()..31-60) **(11-13..Q{J) December 12--07-00 12-14-00 *(I2-6S.00) **(IZ.11-60) January 01-11--01 01-25--01 *(Ol-69..(}J) **(OJ-22-01) Fcbruaxy 02-08-01 02-22-01 *(02-06-01) **(02-19-01) March 03--08-01 03-22--01 *(03-~l) **(03-1~1) April 04-lJ-Ol 04-26--01 *(04-10--01) * * (04-23..()1) May 05-10-01 05-24-01 *(05-08-01) **(05-21..()JJ JUDe 06-14-01 06-211-01 *(06-12-61) * * (06-2.5--IJl) * Propost!d age,ada iums dlle in tire Superintendurt's of.fo\ne by ,.oon on TJlesday prior to ~g. (For p,J,licali.on and distributwn u, tire Board two days prior to tJu muting.) Final agenda ikms dlle in the Superintuulnrt's bffice BY NOON\" Mo,ulqy, (Fqr publication in th monthly b\u0026lt;\u0026gt;Ord agenda.) LITTLE ROCK CLASSROOM TEACHERS ASSOCIATION AN ADVOCACY ORGANIZATION REPRESENTING THE INTERESTS OF THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT'S TEACHERS, PARAPROFESSIONALS, CUSTODIANS, BUS DRIVERS \u0026amp; SECURITY OFFICERS \"OVER 25 YEARS OF OUTSTANDING SERVICE TO OUR MEMBERSHIP\" LRCTA AEA NEA STRENGTH THROUGH UNITY 1500 West 4th Street, Suite 305 Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 372-3519 ARKANSAS TEACHERS FEDERAL CREDIT UNION WE OFFER ANOTHER CREDIT UNION CHOICE FOR SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYEES OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS. FIELD OF MEMBERSHIP The field of membership shall be limited to those having the following common bond: Employees and faculty members of the city and county school systems who work in the following counties in Arkansas: Faulkner Saline Pulaski Jefferson Lonoke Services offered by Arkansas Teachers Federal Credit Union are as follows: Share Accounts Auto Loans Christmas Club Share Secured Loans Signature Loans Payroll Deductions For More Information, Call 375-9250 I 2000-2001 CALENDAR August21,2000 September 4, 2000 October 4, 2000 October 20, 2000 October 23, 2000 November 2-3, 2000 November 22, 2000 November 23-24, 2000 December 18, 2000 January 2, 2001 January 11, 2001 January 12, 2001 January 15, 2001 February 19, 2001 March 5, 2001 March 22, 2001 March 23, 2001 March 26 - 30, 2001 April 13, 2001 May 28, 2001 May 31, 2001 First Day for Students Labor Day (Schools Closed) Parent Conference Day (Students Out) End of First Quarter (43 days) Teachers Record Day (Students Out) AEA Teachers lnservice (Students Out) Staff Development Day (Students Out) Thanksgiving Holiday (Students Out) Winter Vacation Begins Classes Resume End of Second Quarter (42 days) Teachers Record Day (Students Out) Martin Luther King, Jr. Holiday (Students Out) Parent Conference Day (Students Out) Staff Development Day (Students Out) End of Third Quarter ( 46 days) Teachers Record Day (Students Out) Spring Break Staff Development Day (Students Out) Memorial Day Holiday Last Day for Students (42 days) The Little Rock School District Employee Directory is compiled and edited by the Communications Department: Michelle Bonds-Hall, Secretary\nSuellen Vann, Director\nand Crystal Bland, Student COE Employee. Southwestern Bell has made wireless easier than ever and more affordable than you imagined. GO WITH SOMEONE YOU KNOW. Todd Lamb Government Accounts ( 501 ) 626-0022 fidministrative fistings ittle \u0026lt;i(ock School Officials Dr. Les Carnine Superintendent 810 W Markham, 72201 324-2000 (W) Dr. Katherine Mitchell - Zone 1 Board President 1605Welch, 72202 375-6957(H) 370-3579(VM) Term Expires: 2002 310 -5~-6 (-) Mike Daugherty- Zone 2 2101 5. Martin Street, 72204 664-3143 (H) 370-3580 (VM) 666-6388 (FAX) Term Expires: 2001 Judy Magness - Zone 3 Board Secretary 708 Hall Drive, 72205 666-0923 (HJ 370-3581 (VM) Term Expires: 2003 H. Baker Kurrus - Zone 4 Board Vice President 10816CrestdaleLane, 72212 224-4154{H) Larry Berkley- Zone 5 14005St. Charles Blvd., 72211 225-7377 (H) 296-3254(W) Term Expires: 2002 :i(CX, -3~~ ( ,j) -p,~d. a1~-~, ~5 Tony Rose - Zone 6 8109 Mel/wood, 72204 568-7587(H) 56~3122(W) Term Expires: 2003 Term Expires: 2001 Sue H. Strickland - Zone 7 19 Peartree Place, 72209 455-1843 (H) Term Expires: 2003 II 111 LRSD CENTRAL OFFICES 111 LOCATIONS Elementary Literacy .......... ...... .............. 324-0526 LRSD Administration Building ............................ 324-2000 English/Foreign Language .................... 324-0510 810 West Markham Street, 72201 ESL ...................................................... 324-0510 Accelerated Learning Center .............................. 570-1400 Instructional Technology/Library Media. 324-0577 7701 Scott Hamilton, 72209 Mathematics/Science ........................... 324-0520 Administration Annex ......................................... 324-2000 NSF ...................................................... 324-0522 100 South Arch Street, 72201 Planning, Research \u0026amp; Evaluation .......... 324-2121 Adult Education Center ...................................... 671-6397 Professional Development.. ................... 324-0500 4800 West 26th Street, 72204 Social Studies .................................... 324-0514 Alternative Learning Center ................................ 324-2370 Metropolitan Career Technical Center ............... 565-8465 800 Apperson Street, 72202 7701 Scott Hamilton, 72209 Alternative Learning Program Procurement \u0026amp; Materials Management .............. 324-2230 Pennick ALE ............................................................. . 1800 E. Sixth Street, 72202 Philander ALE ........................................................... . Safety and Security ........................................... 324-2400 Athletics Department ......................................... 324-2426 800 Apperson Street, 72202 2409 West 14th Street, 72202 Student Hearing Office ...................................... 324-2169 Child Nutrition .................................................... 324-2250 800 Apperson Street, 72202 1501 Jones Street, 72202 Student Registration Office ............................... 324-2272 Facility Services/Maintenance ........................... 570-4020 501 Sherman Street, 72202 3601 S. Bryant Street, 72204 Transportation Department (Laidlaw) .................. 570-4000 Instructional Resource Center (/RC) 30th \u0026amp; Pulaski Streets ...300 J ~ /~, 5400 Murray, 72209 Transportation Department (LRSD) .................... 324-0551 Early Childhood Education .................... 324-0517 1001 E. 21st Street, 72202 111 LRSD ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENTS 111 ADULT EDUCATION Martin, Paulette, Director ........................................... 671-6398 Humphrey, Ella, Secretary ....................................... 671-6397 Kindy, Linda, Assistant Director ................................ 671-6399 Beard, Ken, Maintenance Technician ............................... 2250 Burlison, Phyllis, Secretary, Free \u0026amp; Reduced .................. 2256 Carroll, Fred, Computer Network Specialist .................. 2250 DalSanto, Judy, Administrative Secretary ....................... 2250 Grayson, Mary, Secretary .................................................. 2250 ATHLETICS Knox, John, Warehouse Manager .................................. 2257 Phelps, Don, Assistant Warehouse Manager ................ 2257 Gillespie, Ray, Athletic Director ......................................... 2426 Flanigan, Laura, Adminstrative Assistant ....................... 2427 Islam. Arie, Secretary ....................................................... 2427 Rhodes, Doug, Maintenance Technician .................... 2250 Scruggs, Rosalyn, Nutrition Education Coordinator ..... 2250 Sellers, Richard, Supervisor Maintenance .................... 2250 Sutton, Anna, Secretary .................................................... 2250 CARE PROGRAM Underwood, Dorothy, Supervisor ................................. 2250 Walker, Audrey, Supervisor ............................................. 2250 Rogers, Martha, Supervisor..... ... . . ........................ 2395 Walker, Stephanie, Supervisor ... ...... .. . .... ........ ..... ... .. 2250 Conrad, Wendy, Bookkeeper .......................................... 2395 Wofford, Pat, Bookkeeper .............................................. 2250 Moore, Cathine, Coordinator ....................................... 0540 Houchin, Veda, Bookkeeper ......................................... 2395 Odle, Vicki, Bookkeeper ............................................. 2395 Westbrook-Walton, Annette, Field Assistant ............ 0539 Fletcher, Rebekah, Field Assistant ............................... 0539 COMMUNICATIONS Vann, Suellen, Director ................................................ 2020 Bonds, Michelle, Secretary .......................................... . 2020 Davis, Julie, Communications Specialist ................. 2020 CAREER/TECHNICAL EDUCATION Green, Carol, Director................................................. .. . 4043 Hochstetler Kim, PBX Operator ................................... 2000 Pickett, Larry, Webmaster ........................................ 2020 Walker, Dennis, StudioNideo Technician ..................... 2020 Hammett, Linda, Secretary ......................................... 4043 Putt, Paulette, Bookkeeper .......................................... 4044 Swihart, Barbara, Special Needs Evaluator ......... 565-8465 Vickers, Shelley, Data Entry Assistant .................. 565-8463 COMMUNITY EDUCATION Baldwin, Marion, Director ............................................ 4149 McDuffie, Clem, 21st Century Grant Coordinator ...... 4149 CHILD NUTRITION Haygood-Evans, Vickie, Secretary .............................. 4149 McCoy, Marlin M., Director ................................................ 2250 Armstrong, Sheila, Reimbursement Coordinator ............ 2250 111 LRSD ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENTS 111 COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES Ruffins, John, Director ...................................................... 2056 Anderson, Margaret, Network Analyst ........ ..... .................. 2019 Barton, Bill, Network Analyst ............................................. 2266 Bates, Vera, Computer Technician ................................... 2266 Bruce, Jackey, Computer Technician ............... .. .............. 2266 Crockran, Walter, Computer Technician ........................... 2266 Crawford, Kevin, Network Analyst ..................................... 0503 Freeman, Greta, Support Specialist ................................. 2063 Hall, Alfreda, Network Analyst ........................................... 2106 Jackson, Debbie, Support Specialist ............................... 2052 McGraw, Helen, SIS Liaison ............................................ 2053 Morgan, Nancy, System Analyst ........................................ 2057 Mouton, Velina, Computer/Operations ... .. ........................ 2058 Neal, Pam, Computer Technician .................................... 2266 Payne, Lisa, Computer Technician ................................. 2266 Renaud, Nan, Systems Analyst ........................................ 2054 Savage, Ken, Programmer/Analyst .................................. 2127 Smith, John, Computer Technician .................................. 2266 Smith, Mary, Secretary ....................................................... 2055 Stephens, Sharon, System Analyst ................... ............... 0533 Tipton, Mattie Ruth, Training Coordinator ......................... 2059 Williams, Ruth, Support Specialist ................................... 2061 Bullock, Pat, Indirect Teacher ............................... , ........... 2193 Chapman, Susan, Supervisor .......................................... 2176 Chase, Diane, Psychological Examiner ...... ..... ......... ....... 2184 Davenport, Loretta, Indirect Teacher ................................. 2174 Gilmore, Shirley, Secretary ......................................... ....... 2181 Glenn, Randy, Coordinator .......................................... ..... 2191 Hasberry, Elna, Supervisor ............. ...... ............. .. ............. 2183 Haygood-Geans, Angelia, Secretary ................................ 2172 Hennessey, Jennifer, Psychological Examiner ...... .......... 2178 Jack, Lynda, Psychological Examiner .............................. 2149 Jacobs, Joyce, Administrative Assistant .......................... 2180 Jenkins, Valerie, Secretary ................................. ......... ... ... 2185 Joubert, Kathy, Indirect Teacher ........................................ 21 93 Jones, Lisa, Secretary ...................................................... 2186 Korte, Paula, Indirect Teacher .... ............... ....................... 2193 Lynch, Wendy, Psychological Examiner ........................... 2180 McEwen, Allyson, Psychological Examiner ...................... 2149 ~clntyre, Nina, Psychological Examiner ........................... 2173 McMullen, Lillie, Psychological Examiner ......................... 2171 Mills, Michelle, Psychological Examiner ........................... 2175 Poturalski, Ed, Homebound Instructor ............................. 2180 Peek, Peggy, Speach Therapy .......................................... 2178 Penn-Norman, Kathy, 504 Coordinator ............................ 2171 Phillip, Terry, Psychological Examiner .............................. 2181 CURRICULUM \u0026amp; INSTRUCTION Quattlebaum, Larry, Psychological Examiner ................... 2195 Rogalski, Becky, Psychological Examiner ....................... 2192 Lesley, Dr. Bonnie, Associate Superintendent ............... 2131 Smith, Eunice, Supervisor ................................................ 2188 Gilliam, Anita, Administrative Assistant ............................ 2131 Smith, Jewel, Custodian ........ ........................................... 2168 Moore, Regina, Secretary ................................................. 2132 Smith, Sharon Job Coach .............................................. 2180 Steele, Cassandra, Speech Coordinator ................... ...... 2196 EARLY CHILDHOOD/ ELEMENTARY LITERACY Story, Wallace, Psychological Examiner ........................... 2195 Thomas, Nanette, Secretary ............................................ 2182 Wisner, Beth, Psychological Examiner ........................... 2149 Price, Pat, Director .......................... .................................. 0517 Wyatt-Ross, Janice, Supervisor ....................................... 2192 Busbea, Pat, Specialist ................................................ 0517 Young, Amy, Hearning Impaired Instructor ....................... 2178 Freeman, Ann, Specialist ................................................ 0517 Huffman, Kris, Specialist ................................................. 0527 FACILITY SERVICES Johnson, Darelene, Secretary .......................................... 0526 Milam, Judy, Specialist ..................................................... 0528 Smith, LeKesha, Secretary ... ........................................... 0517 Teeter, Judy, Specialist ................................................. 0528 Wilson, LeVanna, Assistant Coordinator ........................ 0517 Eaton, Doug, Director .................................................. 4022 Adams, Wayne, Facilities Coordinator ................. ............ 4020 Bennett, Tamela, Construction Secretary ........................ 4026 Blaylock, John, Custodial Manager ............................... 4024 Burkhatter, Mark, Contruction Manager ........................... 4026 ENGLISH/FOREIGN LANGUAGES Hare, Michael, Construction Manager .............................. 4026 Hayes, Steve, Maintenance Supervisor ....................... 4020 Davis, Suzi, Director .......................................................... 051 O Hendrix, Dell, Custodial Supervisor .............................. 4024 Brandon, Barbara, Specialist ........................................... 051 o Long, Alisha, Secretary .................................................. 4023 Briggs, Mona, Specialist.. ............................................. 0510 Moon, Chuck, Grounds Manager ................................ 4020 Jackson, Gwen, Secretary ............................................... 051 o Phelps, Stephanie, Work Order Secretary .................... 4020 Rail, Abanell, Financial Secretary ................................. 4020 ESL Broadnax, Karen, ESL Supervisor .................................... 0531 Jackson, Gwen, Secretary ............................................. 0510 Rector, Janet, Budget Assistant ................... ............ 4020 Reeves, Sharon, Parts Clerk ...................................... 4028 Robinson, Mary, Custodial Supervisor ............................ 4024 Robinson, Michelle, Data Entry Clerk ............................... 4024 EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN Sirisombatranont, Aliscia, Financial ................................ 4020 Smith, Vernon, Construction Manager ............................. 4026 Smith, Dr. Gary, Director ................................................... 2190 Anderson, Amy, Psychological Examiner . ... ... .. ........ 2182 Barnes, Barbara, Supervisor .......................................... 2189 Bright, Donna, Psychological Examiner .......................... 2192 Brown, Kathy, Instructor, Visually Impaired ....................... 2174 Brown, Paula, Instructor, Visually Impaired .................. 2192 Smith, Stuart. Environmental Coordinator ....................... 4026 St. John, Steven, Construction Manager ...... ................... 4026 Stone, Donna, Financial Secretary .................................. 4024 Taggert, James Schedular Estimator ............................ 4020 Townsend. Linda, Custodial Secretary ......................... 4024 Watkins, Lora, Construction Secretary ............................ 4026 Iii LRSD ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENTS ill FEDERAL PROGRAMS Adams, Leon, Director ...................................................... 2110 Akbar, Fatimah, Federal Programs Clerk ......................... 2159 Billingsley, Gloria, N \u0026amp; D Coordinator ............................... 2128 Green, Dorothy, Secretary ................................................. 2110 Ward, Lionel, Title I Administrator ..................................... 0542 FINANCIAL SERVICES IRC Austin, Robert, Custodian ............................................... 0507 Berry, Billy, Head Custodian ............................................ 0507 Brumfield, Frank, Security ............................................... 0507 Kilpatrick, Willie, Instructional Assistant... ........................ 0532 Donaldson, Frances, Instructional Assistant ................... 0532 Computer Lab .................................................................. 2306 Milhollen, Mark, Manager\nFinancial Services ................... 2078 Bray, Shirley, Bookkeeper ................................................. 2298 ,.~l.jGa\u0026amp;hey1 '15,11 Bookkeeper~~ . .f?.~~~.f.~.~ 066 Cleek, Janecia, Bookkeeper ............................................. 2065 Cox, Tanya, Bookkeeper ................................................... 2384 Mayfield, Rhetta, Bookkeeper ........................................... 2068 Parker, Charles, Bookkeeper ........................................... 2289 Ring, Jean, Bookkeeper/Accountant ................................ 2074 Robinson, Benita, Payroll Coordinator ............................. 2336 Sanders, Lynette, Bookkeeper ......................................... 2299 Shiflett, Linda, Bookkeeper .............................................. 2070 Wallis, Carolyn, Bookkeeper ............................................ 2072 Woosley, Lucy, Bookkeeper .............................................. 2067 GIFTED PROGRAMS MATHEMATICS/SCIENCE Glasgow, Dennis, Director ............. .... . ......................... 0520 Carr, Marceline, Lead Teacher ....................................... 0520 Carson, Rene', Lead Teacher ........................................ 0518 Finney, Antonette, Lead Teacher ................................. 0518 Harding, Cassandra, Lead Teacher ................................. 0518 Jones, Dacia, Lead Teacher ........................................ 0520 Killingsworth, Trish, Math Specialist ............................ 0520 Kovach, Renee, Lead Teacher ....................................... 0520 Newcomb, Daryl, Lead Teacher ...................................... 0518 Paul, Annita, Lead Teacher ....................................... 0518 Smith, Paula, Lead Teacher .......................................... 0518 Science Materials Center, 7701 Scott Hamilton .... 570-1418 Lola Perritt, Elementary Science Specialist Kellye Hurd, Assistant Manager Donaldson, Mable, Supervisor ......................................... 2197 Low, Merrily, Secretary ....................................................... 2194 Rynders, Diane, Coordinator ............................................ 2187 HEAL TH SERVICES NSF PROGRAM Cleaver, Vanessa, NSF Project Director ........................ 0522 Harris, Jo Anna, Secretary ..................... .............. .. 0522 Swanson, Margo, Coordinator ........................................ 2161 OMBUDSMAN HIPPY Washington, James, Ombudsman ............................. 2014 Jones, Linda, Administrative Assistant ....................... 2014 Shead-Jackson, Marian, Supervisor ........................ 671-6369 Moore, Emmogene, Coordinator .............................. 671-6369 Sutton Donna, Secretary .......................................... 671-6369 Roper, Annett, Coordinator ............. ........................ 671-6369 HUMAN RESOURCES Hurley, Dr. Richard, Director ........................................ 2080 Bennett-Williams, Pauline, Personnel Coordinator ........ 2089 Eckolls, Marcy, Personnel Coordinator ........................ 2081 Hockersmith, Kimberly, Secretary ..................................... 2080 Jones, Rita, Personnel Coordinator..... ....... . . .. .... ...... . 2082 Williams, Shirley, Applications Coordinator ................... 2085 Robinson, Robert, Mgr. Human Resources .................... 2086 Rodgers, Sue, Substitute Coordinator ............................. 2091 OPERATIONS Gadberry, Brady, Associate Superintendent .............. 2009 Armstrong, Carol, Executive Assistant ....................... 2009 Brown, Willie, Head Custodian .............................. 2030 Cochran, Shea, Administrative Printer ................ 2031 Griffin, lssiac, Asst. Head Custodian .. .. .. .............. 2030 PLANNING \u0026amp; DEVELOPMENT Austin, Linda, Director ............................................... 2112 Wilson, Blondell. Secretary................ .. ............... 2112 PLANNING, RESEARCH INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY/ LIBRARY MEDIA Neal, Lucy, Director .................................................. 0577 Cadman. Suzanne, Secretary ..................................... 0577 Crawford, Pam, Instructional Computer Specialist ........ 0515 Washington, Daniel, AV Technician ............................... 0577 Williams, Barbara, Instructional Computer Specialist ..... 0515 \u0026amp; EVALUATION Lease, Dr Kathy, Assistant Superintendent .............. 2121 Dillingham, Yvette, Evaluation Specialist.. .................... 2123 Johnson, Dr. Virginia, Evaluation Specialist ................ 2269 McCoy, Eddie, Title I Specialist ................................ 0542 Summerville, Rosalyn, Secretary ............................ 0572 Truett-Shelton, Irma, Administrat:ve Assistant ............... 2121 Williams, Dr. Ed, Evaluation Specialist ...................... 2125 Test Distribution Center ........................................ 324-0597 11 :, INTERNAL AUDITOR Becker, Sandy, Internal Auditor ...................................... 2004 1: ' ~ PROCUREMENT Paradis, Darral, Director .................................................. 2235 Banks, Vertina, Property Accounting Secretary ................. 2244 Caraway, Gwen, Fixed Asset Property Manager ............... 2242 Hester, Gail, Purchasing Supervisor ................................. 2234 Land, Kitty, Purchase Order Entry Specialist .................... 2240 Luehring, Patrice, Contracting Supervisor ........................ 2238 Manley, Tisa, Purchasing Order Clerk .............................. 2305 Matthews, Gwen, Construction Buyer ............. ..... ............. 2307 Murray, Fran, Contract Specialist ............................... .. ...... 2243 Spinelli, Gretchen, Buyer ................................................... 2239 Tate, Sharrell, Textbook Coordinator ........................... .. .... 2241 Tucker, Debbie, Supply Center ................................. .. ..... 2232 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Woods, Marion, Coordinator ............................................. 0512 Kiilsgaard, Sharon, Secretary ........................................... 0500 Walls, Sue, Specialist ....................................................... 0502 PUPIL SERVICES Elston, Jo Evelyn, Director ............................................ 2163 Blanzenski, Becky, Secretary ............................. ....... ...... 2160 Hawks, Everett, Dropout Prevention Coordinator ..... 671-6325 Hudson, Valerie, Drug Prevention Coordinator ................ 2167 Johnston, Samia, Case Manager .................. ........... ..... 2164 Merritt, Reginald, Violence Prevention Specialist ............ 2164 Merry, Susan, CIC Site Administrator .............................. 2184 Newburn, Linda, Secretary ................................................ 2162 Robinson, Warrine, Homeless Shelter Liaison .. ............ 2166 SAFE SCHOOLS/HEALTHY STUDENTS Paal, Mary, Director ...................................................... 2413 Braden, Carutha, Secretary ............................... .. ....... 2412 SAFETY \u0026amp; SECURITY Jones. Bobby, Director ................................................... 2400 Allen, Don, Coord. of Pupil/Personnel Safety .............. 2400 Anderson, John, Supv. of Building Security .................... 2400 Carter, John, District-Wide Security .................................. 2400 Harshaw, Roberta, Mobile Officer ..................................... 2400 Hill, Claudette, Secretary ................................................ 2400 McDonald, Benny, Supv. of Security Personnel ................ 2400 Miller, Emma, Secretary ............................................... 2400 Opitz, Sarah, Secretary ..................................................... 2400 Smith, Jerry, Substance Abuse Coordinator ..................... 2400 SCHOOL SERVICES Mitchell, Sadie, Associate Supterintendent ................. 2007 Cawthon-Jones, Frances, Asst. Supt. Elementary ........ 2006 Gunter, Kaye, Staff Assistant ......................................... 2016 Hoffman, Gayle, Coordinator .......................................... 0568 Lacey, Dr. Marian, Asst. Supt. Secondary ....................... 2005 Smith, Linda, Administrative Assistant ............................ 2010 Washington, Charlotte, Staff Assistant .......................... 2013 SOCIAL STUDIES McNeal, Marie A., Director ................................................. 0514 Crosslin, Patricia, Secretary .............................................. 0514 STUDENT REGISTRATION (*44) Babbs, Junious, Associate Superintendent ..................... 2272 Click, Tonya, Student Registration Assistant .................... 2272 Eggleston, Deana, Executive Assistant ........ ..... ..... .. .... .... 2408 Lewis, Shirley, Student Registration Assistant ........... ...... 2272 Middleton, Essie, Parent Recruiter .......... ..... ............. ... .... 2438 Miller, Brenda, Student Registration Assistant ................. 2272 Rather, Becky, Parent Recruiter Coordinator .................... 214 7 Teach, Patty, Secretary ............ .. ... .... ................... ....... ........ 2272 Wiedower, Julie, Director .. ................................................. 2155 STUDENT HEARING Watson, Dr. Linda, Assistant Superintendent ... ................ 2170 Campbell, Sharon, Secretary ............................................ 2169 SUPERINTENDENT Carnine, Dr. Leslie, Superintendent ........................... ...... 2012 Stewart, Dr. Don, Chief Financial Officer ................ ..... ...... 2263 Goodwin, Bill, District Engineer .......... ... ........................ ... 2262 Armstrong, Ramona, Secretary ........................ ............ ..... 2116 Edwards, Diane, Staff Assistant ....................................... 2100 Griffin, Beverly, Executive Assistant ...................... ............. 2012 SUPPLY CENTER Willis, Leonard, Manager ...... .. .......................................... 2237 Griffin, Robert, Assistant Manager .................................... 2237 Haygood, Charles, Driver/Warehouse Assistant .............. 2237 Harris, Curtis, Driver/Warehouse Assistant ..................... 2237 Richardson, Wendell, Driver/Warehouse Assistant ......... 2237 Shelton, Tommy, Driver/Warehouse Assistant ... .... ... .. ..... 2237 Sutton, Jim, Driver/Warehouse Assistant ......................... 2237 Terry, Gifford, Inventory Supervisor/Central Receiving ...... 2236 TRANSPORTATION-LASO Martello, Michael, Director ............... ................... .. ............. 0555 Bilal, B.J., Supervisor ......................................................... 0553 Cooper, Floyd, Supervisor ................................................. 0552 Davis, Johnnie, Supervisor ............................................... 0552 Jones, Virgil, Driver Trainer ............................................... 0554 LAIDLAW ........................................ , ........................... 570-4000 Robinson, Bettye, Supervisor ........................................... 0551 Humphrey, Teressa, Executive Liaison to Laidlaw ... 568 1078 VIPS Milam, Debbie, Director .................................................... 2297 Blaylock, Tammy, Volunteer Coordinator ........................... 2294 Geisler, Sherry, Secretary ................. ................................ 2291 Matson, Lee Ann, Resource/Field Trip Coordinator ......... 2295 Patterson, Keisha, Mentor Coordinator ............................ 2292 Rainey, Kaye, Office Manager ........................................... 2293 111 Directory of Commonly Used Fax Numbers 111 Schools/Centers Accelerated Learning Center ....... ... .... 570-4108 Jefferson .... .. ....... ........... .. ... ... ..... .... ...... 671-6289 Alternative Learning Center ........ .... ..... 324-2372 M L King ....... ... .. ......... ... .... ...... ........... .. 324-2150 Badgett ........ .... ............................ .. ....... 324-2483 Mabelvale Elementary ........... .. ........ .. .. 455-7 410 Bale .... ... ... ................ .. ................ ... ....... 570-4134 Mabelvale Middle .... .... .. ......... .. ... ..... .... 455-7 403 Baseline ...................... .. .. .......... ........ .. .. 570-4152 Mann .......... .. .. ............. ........ .. .... .. .. .. .... .. 324-2496 Booker ... ......... .. ...... ............ .... ... .. ......... 324-2108 McClellan ......... .. .... .... .... .. .. ...... ........ ..... 570-4098 Brady .. ..... ......... .. ........... ... ........ .. ... ...... . 228-3129 McDermott ... ................ .. ....................... 228-3104 Carver .. ........... ... ... ......... ....................... 324-2421 Meadowcliff .. ..... .. ...... .. ..... .. ....... .. ....... *570-4037 Central ......... .... ...... ........ ... .... ... .. ..... .. .... 324-2308 Metropolitan ........... .... .......................... 565-0233 Chicot .... .......... ... .. ............. ... ..... .... ...... . 570-4194 Mitchell ............ .... .. .. ..... ...... .... .... .. ... .. .... 324-2419 Cloverdale Elementary .. .. ... ...... ...... ..... 570-4060 Otter Creek .. .. .. ..................................... 455-7 498 Cloverdale Middle ... .... .... .... ... ........ ...... 570-4011 Parkview ...... .... .. ......... .. .. .. ......... .. ......... 228-3061 Dodd .. .... .. .. .. .. .................. ... ..... ..... .... .. .. 455-7427 Pulaski Heights Elementary .. .......... .... 671-6287 Dunbar ..... ..... .. ........ ....... ................ ... .... 324-2439 Pulaski Heights Middle ........................ 671-6294 Elementary Charter .. .. ......... ... ........ .. .. .. 324-0594 Rightsell .................. .. .................. .. ........ 324-0535 Fair Park .. .. ........................ ....... ...... ... ... 671-6205 Rockefeller ...... .. .. ...... .. .... ... .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. 324-2392 Forest Heights .............. ........ .... .. .. ........ 671-638 7 Romine .... .......... .. .. .. .. .. .. ..... ................ *228-3092 Forest Park ........ ... .............. .. ............... 671-6315 Southwest .... .. : .. ..... .. ..... .. ....... .. ............. 570-4015 Franklin ... ... .. ........ .. .... ... .. .... ..... ............. 671-6318 Terry .. .. ..... ........................... .................. 228-3096 Fulbright ............... .. ....... ........ ..... ... ... .. ... 228-3148 Wakefield .. ........... ............. .. ... ........... .. *570-1406 Stephens .. ...... ... ...... .. ... .... .................. .. 671-6295 Washington ........... .. .......... .. .................. 324-24 76 Geyer Springs .. ................ ....... ............. 570-4170 Watson ........ ........... .. ....... ..... ........ .... ..... 570-4184 Gibbs .. ... ........ ... .. .. .. .... .. ........................ 324-0541 Western Hills ........ ... .......................... .. . 570-1405 Hall ...... .. .. .. .... ........ .... ..... ..... .. .. .. ..... ....... 671-6207 Williams ........................ .. ...................... 671-6332 Henderson ................. .. .............. .. ......... 228-3078 Wilson ................ ... ............... ............... .. 570-4083 J A Fair ..... ..... ....... .... .... .. ..... ..... ...... .. .... 228-3133 Woodruff ............ .. .. .. ............................. 671-6338 *l\\.lust dial prefix plus extension Departments/Other Adult Education .. .................. .. .... .. ...... .. 671-6367 LRSD ...... .... .. .... .............. .......... ............ 324-2032 Annex (Exceptional Children) .............. 324-2199 New Futures ........................................ 324-2115 Athletics .... .. .................. .. .. .. ........ .. ........ 324-2119 Ombudsman ..... .......... .............. .. .. ... ..... 324-2260 Career/Technical Education ................ 565-7641 Planning/Research ........ .... ................. 324-2126 Child Nutrition .. .... .. .. ...... .. .. .. ................. 324-2039 ProcuremenUSupply Center ................ 324-2233 Classroom Teachers Assn .................. 375-1703 Pupil Services ........ .. ............................ 324-0543 Communications .................... .. ..... ..... .. 324-2023 Safety \u0026amp; Security .................................. 324-2403 Computer Information Svcs ................ 324-2041 School Services .............. .. .................. 324-2213 Credit Union .... .. ........ .. ............ .. ...... . ... 374-1035 Staff Development ......... .. ................... 324-0508 Curriculum Instruction .................. .. ....... 324-0567' Student Assignment.. ............... .... ..... 324-2281 Facility Services .. .. .. ....... .. ............ ... ..... 570-4027 Student Hearing . .. ............................... 324-0536 Federal Programs .. .. ........ .. .. .. ... ... .. ...... 324-2287 Superintendent's Office .. .................... 324-2146 Financial Services ............. ... .. .. ....... .... 324-2079 Transportation (Laidlaw) ................... ... 570-4009 HIPPY ... .... .... .......... .... .. .. .... ... .. ............ 671-6322 Transportation (LRSD) .................... .. ... 324-0557 Human Resources .. .. .. .. .. ..... .... ............ 324-2090 Truancy Center ................................... 671-6330 IRC .. ........ .. ........ .. .................... ........ .. 324-0504 Volunteers In Public Schools ............... 324-2044 FREQUENTLY CALLED NUMBERS Arkansas Education Association 1400 W. Third Street ................................... 375-4611 Arkansas PTA .................................................... 753-5247 Arkansas State Department of Education ...... 682-4475 Arkansas Teachers' Credit Union ................... 375-9250 Arkansas Teachers' Retirement ...................... 682-1517 Association of Educational Office Professionals President, Regina Moore ............................. 324-2132 1st Vice Pres., Pat Rowland . ..... ... .... . .. 455-7440 2nd Vice Pres., Edna Walton ...................... 228-3080 Secretary, Patricia Crosslin .......................... 324-0514 Treasurer, Alice Clark ............................... 324-2440 Attorneys ........................................................... 376-2011 Friday, Eldredge, Clark - Regions Bank Bldg Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association 1500 W. Fourth, Suite 305 ......................... 372-3519 President, Clementine Kelley ...... 372-3519/663-2584 Vice President, Betty Mitchell ....... 671-6250/851-8650 Secretary, Faye Parker ................. 671-6397/569-9667 Treasurer, Jessie Benson ............. 570-4085/455-5633 Executive Dir., Frank Martin ................. 372-3519 Adm. Asst., Brenda Walton ........................ 372-3519 Little Rock PTA Council ................................... 224-6076 Thelma Jasper, President ........... 224-6076/771-8093 LRSD Insurance Office ..................................... 324-2080 Little Rock Teachers Credit Union .................. 374-7119 Magnet Review Committee Office .................. 758-0156 New Futures ...................................................... 374-1011 Office of Desegregation Monitoring ............... 376-6200 Pfeifer Camp ..................................................... 821-3714 Physician, School District ................................ 320-3605 Dr. Charles Feild - Arkansas Children's Hospital Principals' Roundtable President, Larry Buck ........................... 228-3050 Co -President, Celestine Piggee ............ 228-3000 Vice President, Felecia Hobbs ............... 324-2490 Secretary, Jane Harkey ....................... 570-4062 Assistant Secretary ................................. 455-7430 Treasurer, Tyrone Harris ..................... 324-2135 Past President, Lillie Carter .................. 671-6290 Member at Large, Nancy Rousseau ............ 671-6250 Substitute Office Services To Request Sub ......... , ................................ 324-2221 Help Desk ................................................... 324-2229 Administrators and teachers are good at making plans. So, how are you doing on your retirement? Do you know how much money you 'II need during retirement? And where it will come from? How much should you be saving from each paycheck? Where should you invest your money? What's the best way for you to receive your retirement income? These are the kinds of questions that sound retirement planning answers. And you can get all the planning help you need from V ALIC Amen ca 's leadmg provider of tax-qualified retirement plans to administrators, teachers and other employees at K-12 schools. For face-to-face assistance wit!, your retirement planning, call 501-603-2200 for Britton Nowell, Jim Pate or Ric!,ard Wiseman. VALIC An American General Company C2000 VALIC (The Variable Annu11y Life Insurance Company). llouston Tc,as Your Goals Are Our Goals: We're here to provide you with sound, creative solutions to a lifetime of financial concerns. Come join us under the umbrella Travelers Life \u0026amp; Annu~ A \"1, ,f Trau, lersGr~~~ J W. R. (Bob) Atkins Mary K. Skelton Penny Jones W. R. Atkins Insurance 10220 West Markham, Suite 201-8 Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 Business: 501 228-0300 Residence 501 776-3548 bat kins l@swbell net Representing The Travelers Companies, Hartford, CT 06183 School/(J\u0026gt;rogram fisting Sc/100[ Iriforrnation ACCELERATED LRNG PRG FAIR PARK PRINCIPAL DR ALICIA FINCH v PHONE 570-1400 PRINCIPAL DR SAMUEL BRANCH.,. PHONE 671-6260 7701 SCOTT HAMIL TON FAX 570-4108 616 N HARRISON FAX 671-6205 LITTLE ROCK 72209 LITTLE ROCK 72205 ALTERNATIVE LRNG CTR FOREST HEIGHTS PRINCIPAL LLOYD SAIN v\" PHONE 324-2370 PRINCIPAL ELOUISE HUDSON PHONE 671-6390 800 APPERSON FAX 324-2372 5901 EVERGREEN FAX 671-6387 LITTLE ROCK 72202 LITTLE ROCK 72205 BADGETT FOREST PARK PRINCIPAL MARY GOLSTON ii PHONE 324-2475 PRINCIPAL THERESA KETCHER V PHONE 671-6267 6900 PECAN RD FAX 324-2483 1600 N TYLER FAX 671-6315 LITTLE ROCK 72206 LITTLE ROCK 72207 BALE FRANKLIN PRINCIPAL BARBARA ANDERSON PHONE 570-4050 PRINCIPAL ETHEL DUNBAR V PHONE 671-6380 6501 W 32ND FAX 570-4134 1701 S HARRISON FAX 671-6318 LITTLE ROCK 72204 LITTLE ROCK 72204 BASELINE FULBRIGHT PRINCIPAL ELEANOR COX ,/ PHONE 570-4150 PRINCIPAL DEBORAH MITCHELLV PHONE 228-3080 3623 BASELINE RD FAX 570-4152 300 PLEASANT VALLEY DR FAX 228-3148 LITTLE ROCK 72209 LITTLE ROCK 72212 BOOKER GEYER SPRINGS PRINCIPAL DR CHERYL CARSON Y PHONE 324-2482 PRINCIPAL DONNAHALL V PHONE 570-4160 2016 BARBER FAX 324-2108 5240 MABELVALE PIKE FAX 570-4170 LITTLE ROCK 72206 LITTLE ROCK 72209 BRADY GIBBS PRINCIPAL ADA KEOWN V PHONE 228-3065 PRINCIPAL FELICIA HOBBS v\" PHONE 324-2490 7915 W MARKHAM FAX 228-3129 1115W16THST FAX 324-0541 LITTLE ROCK 72205 LITTLE ROCK 72202 CARVER HALL PRINCIPAL DIANE BARKSDALE V PHONE 324-2460 PRINCIPAL VERNON SMITH a./' PHONE 671-6200 2100 E SIXTH ST FAX 324-2421 6700 \"H\" STREET FAX 671-6207 LITTLE ROCK 72202 LITTLE ROCK 72205 CENTRAL HENDERSON PRINCIPAL RUDOLPH HOWARD PHONE 324-2300 PRINCIPAL LARRY BUCK V PHONE 228-3050 1500 S PARK ST FAX 324-2308 401 BARROW RD FAX 228-3078 LITTLE ROCK 72202 LITTLE ROCK 72205 CHICOT J A FAIR PRINCIPAL JANE HARKEY V PHONE 570-4062 PRINCIPAL CASSANDRA NORMAN PHONE 228-3100 11100 CHICOT RD FAX 570-4194 13420 DAVID O DODD FAX 228-3133 MABELVALE 72103 LITTLE ROCK 72210 CLOVERDALE ELEM JEFFERSON PRINCIPAL FREDERICK FIELDS c/ PHONE 570-4055 PRINCIPAL ROBERTA MANNON I./ PHONE 671-6281 6500 HINKSON RD FAX 570-4060 2600 N MCKINLEY FAX 671-6289 LITTLE ROCK 72209 LITTLE ROCK 72207 CLOVERDALE MIDDLE ML KING PRINCIPAL DAVID PATTERSON PHONE 570-4085 PRINCIPAL TYRONE HARRIS V PHONE 324-2135 6300 HINKSON RD FAX 570-4011 905 MARTIN L. KING, JR. DR FAX 324-2150 LITTLE ROCK 72209 LITTLE ROCK 72202 DODD MABEL VALE ELEM PRINCIPAL FAITH MCLAUGHLIN V PHONE 455-7430 PRINCIPAL TABITHA PHILLIPS - PHONE 455-7420 6423 STAGECOACH RD FAX 455-7427 9401 MVALE CUT-OFF FAX 455-7410 LITTLE ROCK 72204 MABELVALE 72103 DUNBAR MABEL VALE MIDDLE PRINCIPAL DEBORAH BERRY ..,..... PHONE 324-2440 PRINCIPAL ANN BLAYLOCK V' PHONE 455-7400 1100 WRIGHT AVE FAX 324-2439 10811 MABELVALE WEST FAX 455-7403 LITTLE ROCK 72206 MABELVALE 72103 r1 MANN STEPHENS I PRINCIPAL JIM FULLERTON PHONE 324-2450 PRINCIPAL SHARON BROOKS v PHONE 671-6275 I 1000 E ROOSEVELT RD FAX 324-2496 3700 W. 18TH ST. FAX 671-6295 LITTLE ROCK 72206 LITTLE ROCK 72204 MCCLELLAN TERRY PRINCIPAL JODIE CARTER PHONE 570-4100 PRINCIPAL NANCY ACRE ...-- PHONE 228-3093 I 6417 GEYER SPRINGS FAX 570-4098 10800 MARA LYNN DR FAX 228-3096 LITTLE ROCK 72209 LITTLE ROCK 72211 MCDERMOTT WAKEFIELD PRINCIPAL VIRGINIA ASHLEYv PHONE 228-3072 PRINCIPAL LES TAYLOR ....- PHONE 570-4190 II 1200 RESERVOIR RD FAX 228-3104 75 WESTMINISTER FAX 9-570-1406 LITTLE ROCK 72207 LITTLE ROCK 72209 'I MEADOWCLIFF WASHINGTON PRINCIPAL JERRY WORM V PHONE 570-4165 PRINCIPAL GWEN ZEIGLER ....- PHONE 324-2470 25 SHERATON DR FAX 570-4037 2700 MAIN STREET FAX 324-2476 LITTLE ROCK 72209 LITTLE ROCK 72206 METROPOLITAN WATSON PRINCIPAL MICHAEL PETERSON PHONE 565-8465 PRINCIPAL MICHAEL OLIVER v- PHONE 570-4195 7701 SCOTT HAMILTON FAX 565-0233 7000 VALLEY DR FAX 570-4184 LITTLE ROCK 72209 LITTLE ROCK 72209 MITCHELL WESTERN HILLS PRINCIPAL DARIAN SMITH V' PHONE 324-2415 PRINCIPAL SCOTT MORGAN ,/ PHONE 570-4175 2410 BATTERY FAX 324-2419 4901 WESTERN HILLS FAX 570-1405 LITTLE ROCK 72206 LITTLE ROCK 72204 OTTERCREEK WILLIAMS I PRINCIPAL JANIS TUCKER ,_...... PHONE 455-7440 PRINCIPAL MARY MENKING ,_...... PHONE 671-6363 16000 OTTER CREEK PKY FAX 455-7498 7301 EVERGREEN FAX 671-6332 I LITTLE ROCK 72209 LITTLE ROCK 72207 I PARKVIEW WILSON I PRINCIPAL DR. LINDA BROWN PHONE 228-3000 PRINCIPAL BEVERLY JONES v PHONE 570-4180 2501 BARROW RD FAX 228-3061 4015 STANNUS RD FAX 570-4083 LITTLE ROCK 72204 LITTLE ROCK 72204 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM WOODRUFF PRINCIPAL LILLIE CARTER ....- PHONE 671-6290 PRINCIPAL JANICE WILSON V PHONE 671-6270 319 N PINE FAX 671-6287 3010 W 7TH FAX 671-6338 LITTLE ROCK 72205 LITTLE ROCK 72205 PULASKI HEIGHTS MIDDLE PRINCIPAL NANCY ROUSSEAU v PHONE 671-6250 401 N PINE FAX 671-6294 LITTLE ROCK 72205 RESIDENTIAL ELEMENTARY CHARTER PRINCIPAL KRISHNA YOUNG .....- PHONE 324-0590 6900 PECAN RD FAX 324-0594 LITTLE ROCK 72206 RIGHTSELL PRINCIPAL MARY SMITH _. PHONE 324-2430 911 W 19TH FAX 324-0535 LITTLE ROCK 72206 ROCKEFELLER PRINCIPAL ANNE MANGAN V PHONE 324-2385 700 E 17TH FAX 324-2392 LITTLE ROCK 72206 ROMINE PRINCIPAL LILLIE SCULL V PHONE 228-3086 3400 ROMINE RD FAX 9-228-6246 LITTLE ROCK 72204 SOUTHWEST PRINCIPAL JIMMOSBY PHONE 570-4070 3301 S BRYANT FAX 570-4015 LITTLE ROCK 72204 ACCELERATED LRNG PRG PRINCIPAL: DR. ALICIA FINCH ANDERSON, KATHERINE D ARMSTEAD, VICTORIA M BLACKNALL, STACY J BLAKE, WILLIAM BOYD, RENARDO J LEARNING FOUNDATIONS SECRETARY CURRICULUM TECH. AIDE ACC LEARNING ALT LEARNING TEACHER BROADNAX-THRASHER, BEVERLY ALT LEARNING TEACHER BROYLES, BENNIE J. DUKES, MARION F FINCH, ALICIA I GARNER, DEBRA A GARZA,NORAJOSETTE GREER, GEORGIA HENSON, KATHYE HILL, PICCOLA L KELLEY, LOIS W MCCOY, JAMES E MCKINNEY, REBECCA A MATHEMATICS I AIDE ACC LEARNING ASST. PRINCIPAL ALT LEARNING TEACHER SOCIAL STUDIES AIDE ACC LEARNING ALT LEARNING TEACHER ALT LEARNING TEACHER ALT LEARNING TEACHER SCIENCE GUIDANCE SEC. MORRISON-COKELEY, BARBARA A PROGRAM/ACT. COOR. NASH, EV El YN R STRAYER,SUSANJANE TAYLOR, MARY M TERRELL, LEE THOMPSON, CHARLES RAY PUPIL PERSONNEL ENGLISH SPECIAL EDUCATION SECURITY OFFICER SECURITY OFFICER 7701 SCOTT HAMIL TON LITTLE ROCK 72209 PHONE 570-1400 FAX: 570-4108 ALTERNATIVE LRNG CTR PRINCIPAL: LLOYD SAIN BANKS, OTIS R PHYSICAL EDUCATION BECK, SHARYON HODGE ENGLISH BENNETT, GEORGETTA J AIDE BLUFORD, YOLANDA K SECURITY OFFICER BRADEN JR, LEE E AIDE BROWN, LELA MICHELLE ENGLISH CAMPBELL JR, MELVIN ALTERNATIVE LEARNING COLLIER, CLEOPHIS ADMINISTRATIVE ASST. DEPRIEST, PATRICIA S GUIDANCE SEC. FORTE, RODERICK D AIDE GIBSON, FLORA DENISE AIDE GRAY, DAISY L ENGLISH HOBBS, WALTER E. AIDE JACKSON, SHAROL T. AIDE JOHNSON, TAWANNA F SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL KELLEY, LAURIE LYNN SOCIAL STUDIES LESTER, OSCAR E CUSTODIAN HEAD I LOVE, DOREY LYNN MATHEMATICS I I MANN, TRAVIS D IN SCHOOL SUSPENSION MCCRAY, ALAN SECURITY OFFICER MCCRAY, ALAN CRAIG SECURITY OFFICER MITCHELL, JAIME BROOK SPECIAL EDUCATION NESBITT, JEFF RAY SECURITY OFFICER REINHART, THOMAS T MATHEMATICS I REYNOLDS, RODNEY MICHAEL SPECIAL EDUCATION SAIN, LLOYD DIRECTOR ALC SAINE, KENORIS AIDE SMITH, VINCENTE AIDE TARTT, PHYLLIS G BIOLOGY TATE, ANTHONY BERNARD AIDE TAYLOR, DAVID SCOTT SPECIAL EDUCATION WATSON, KELAN SOCIAL STUDIES 800 APPERSON LITTLE ROCK 72202 PHONE 324-2370 FAX: 324-2372 I I BADGETT PRINCIPAL: MARY GOLSTON ADAMS, ARBELLE BROOKS, DEBRA J. CAMPBELL. ETHEL J DUNAHAY, KIM GOLSTON, MARY R GRAY, KATHRYN M HESSELBEIN, APRIL I JOHNSON, CLAUDE COBLE JOHNSON, COTINNA L JONES.MARY MCCRUEL, LESLIE L MCGOWAN, DORIS J MCLENNAN, ANN E PHILLIPS, THELMA SCRUBBS JR, WALTER SWAN, CLAUDIA LAFRAN TRAYLOR, KATHLEEN A VALUE, TERRI VARADY, WANDA Y WAKELYN, JOAN WALKER, BETTY WHITE, TONI WROTEN, MYRTHENE R CHILD NUTRITION ELEMENTARY V ELEMENTARY Ill PARAPROFESSIONAL ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL PARAPROFESSIONAL ELEMENTARY IV SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL KINDERGARTEN CHILD NUTRITION MGR. CUSTODIAN - HEAD ELEMENTARY I ELEMENTARY II PARAPROFESSIONAL PARAPROFESSIONAL ELEMENTARY I ELEMENTARY IV SPEECH THERAPY GUIDANCE COUNSELOR LIBRARIAN - ELEMENTARY CHILD NUTRITION LAB ATTENDANT TITLE I MATH 6900 PECAN RD LITTLE ROCK 72206 PHONE 324-2475 FAX: 324-2483 I BALE PRINCIPAL: BARBARA ANDERSON ANDERSON, BARBARA A ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL BAGGETT, CINDY J. SPECIAL EDUCATION BALENKO-TUCKER, MARYE MATHEMATICS BRADFORD, OLLIE M AIDE BROWN, CLARA J ELEMENTARY I CHILDS, FRANCES C AIDE COLE, KIMBERLY L ELEMENTARY I COLLINS, PEGGY S MUSIC CONLEY, FRANCES J ELEMENTARY Ill COURTNEY, JUDITH E SPEECH THERAPY CUNNINGHAM, LISA D ELEMENTARY II DAVIS, LINDA D AIDE - SUPERVISION DOCKERY, MAE K ELEMENTARY V DOUTT, SHERYLL AIDE FITZPATRICK, DEBORAH L LIBRARIAN - ELEMENTARY FRANCIS, LYNDA S ELEMENTARY V FUNK, PAULA R ELEMENTARY Ill GENTRY-HEARD,RENE~ SPECIAL EDUCATION GEURIN, RAMONA 0 KINDERGARTEN HASAN, ABDULLAH H CUSTODIAN - HEAD HILL, CAROLYN SECRETARY HORNER, BOBBIE RAY AIDE - SUPERVISION HUDSON, MARY B AIDE JOHNSON, CARTHORIA EARLY CHILDHOOD JONES, TANIKA ELEMENTARY II LEWIS, MELVIN D AIDE LITTELL, TERRI S ELEMENTARY I MILLER, VANESSA AIDE MORAVEC, LEIGH A ELEMENTARY IV OWENS, ROMUNDA L AIDE PADILLA, PAULA GIT SPECIALIST PAFFORD, JENNIFER L. SPECIAL EDUCATION PALMER, CHERYLL AIDE ROSSY, KIMBERLY PRE-K ROUSE, WARREN J GUIDANCE COUNSELOR ROY,ALAN D CUSTODIAN - PART TIME SCARBROUGH, VALARIE LAB ATTENDANT SHENEP, CYNTHIA K SPEECH THERAPY SHUTE, KATHLEEN MARIE KINDERGARTEN TALLEY, HELEN J ELEMENTARY II TARKINGTON, RONALD STEVE ELEMENT ARY IV WOODARD, LORETTA Y CUSTODIAN 6501 W 32ND LITTLE ROCK 72204 PHONE 570-4050 FAX: 570-4134 1...111111111 I BASELINE PRINCIPAL: ELEANOR COX BANKS, MARY JO BELIN, PHONTONIA BELL, CLARENCE BENTON, JIMMIE A BOWMAN, ROSE H CANNON, SHIRLEY L CASEY, DOROTHY A COLE, BETTY J CONLEY, TINA A COX, ELEANOR V DEATON, BETTY K DELONEY, GLORIA M DONALD, BETTY J DUKES, ROCHELLE DUNN, WILJ GARNER, BEVERLY B GREER, NIKKI GAY HAMPTON, SHARRA D HUMBERT, MARSHA A HUNT, SAMMIE K JAMES, MARILYN K JORDAN, DIANE M. KING, STEPHANIE D KOEHLER, CATHERINE E. LESTER, REBECCA JILL LOVE, BEVERLY ANN MARTIN, REBEKAH A MCDONALD, MARY J MCPHEARSON, KELLI L MCSPADDEN, ELIZABETH L MOORE, JOLANDA R OUTLAW, ASHLEY SUSAN RENDEL, RAYL RICH, ANDREA KATHRYN ROSS, CHRISTINA MARIE SELF, ELAINE M SHARP, CONNIE D STANFIELD, FRANCESE STUBBLEFIELD, BRYAN THOMAS, BRENDA SUE TUCKER, KELSEY Y WILLIAMS, HENRIETTA AIDE SPECIAL EDUCATION SECURITY OFFICER CUSTODIAN ELEMENTARY V AIDE AIDE SUPERVISION SPEECH THERAPY AIDE ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL ELEMENTARY I SECRETARY PRINCIPAL AIDE SUPERVISION FOUR YR OLD TEACHER MUSIC ELEMENTARY I AIDE GUIDANCE COUNSELOR AIDE SPECIAL EDUCATION ELEMENTARY I ELEMENTARY V AIDE SUPERVISION LIBRARIAN ELEMENTARY ELEMENTARY Ill KINDERGARTEN ELEMENTARY 111 MATHEMATICS AIDE ELEMENTARY 11 AIDE INSTRUCTIONAL KINDERGARTEN CUSTODIAN HEAD ELEMENTARY IV KINDERGARTEN FOUR YR OLD TEACHER ELEMENTARY II ELEMENTARY II AIDE ELEMENTARY IV MEDIA CLERK CUSTODIAN 3623 BASELINE RD LITTLE ROCK 72209 PHONE 570-4150 FAX: 570-4152 BOOKER PRINCIPAL: DR. CHERYL CARSON ALLEY, MARYL ARMSTRONG, ERMA L ARMSTRONG, MARTHA A BIERBAUM, KIMBERLY DAWN BLEDSOE, RITA L BLUE, SUSAN D BROWN, LAWRENCE BROWN, MARTHA C BURNS, PATRICIA M BURROUGH, HOLLY ANN BURRUSS, MERILYN P CALHOUN, JIMMY ORLANDO CARSON, CHERYL A CHARLESTON, SANTONIA CLARK, DENISE W CRIPPS, JOSEPH D CROSWELL, CAROLYN CURRY, VIRGINIA E DAVIS, YOLANDA E DOOLEY, VIVIAN K DORER, ROBERT A ELLINGTON, LORETTA FAIR, DIXIE W GINGERICH, TAMARA L HALLUM, AMY L. HAYDEN, DARRELL L HAYES, OMAH HIGDON, TAMMY HIPP, BRENDA J HIPPS, DEBORAH S. HUIE, CAROLYN K JACKSON, KENNETH RAY JACKSON, PATRICIA B JEFFRIES, VEARLON L JOHNSON, MAYREAN S JONES, ALICIA R KINDER, JAMES B LANG, KIMBERLY LAVERNE LEHNHOFF, DENNA N LOFTON, MARY R MAHNKEN, SUSAN E MANLEY, TISA S MARSHALL, JAMES A MAYWEATHER, LOUISE INSTRUCTIONAL SPEC. READING CREATIVE MOVEMENT KINDERGARTEN ORCHESTRA ELEMENT ARY IV CUSTODIAN MATHEMATICS LIBRARIAN - ELEMENTARY ELEMENTARY Ill MATHEMATICS ELEMENTARY IV ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL AIDE - SUPERVISION ELEMENTARY IV ORCHESTRA AIDE - SUPERVISION AIDE - SUPERVISION ELEMENTARY I GUIDANCE COUNSELOR ELEMENTARY PHYS. ED. ELEMENTARY Ill ELEMENTARY II GUIDANCE COUNSELOR ELEMENT ARY Ill ELEMENTARY Ill CUSTODIAN ELEMENTARY II READING RECOVERY ELEMENT ARY V GIFTED \u0026amp; TALENTED CUSTODIAN ELEMENTARY IV KINDERGARTEN ELEMENTARY V ELEMENTARY I ART ELEMENTARY II ELEMENTARY V MUSIC READING RECOVERY SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL CUSTODIAN HEAD AIDE SUPERVISION 2016 BARBER LITTLE ROCK 72206 MCGILL, MICHELLE L MCGUIRE, STEPHEN K MCMORRAN, MARY E MIDDLETON, PATSY A MIL TON, CAROLYN D MIL TON, KENNETH W POST, JULIA A RAMSEY.DEBORAH RHINES, MICO RENEE SARLO, THOMAS C SCOTT, UVITA L SEXTON, TAMMY L. SPENCER, LYNDA K STANSBERY, ANITA L STRONG, CATHERINE A TAYLOR, JULIA COTHERINE THOMAS, JONI R. TUCKER, TRACY SELBY WALLS, BOBBIE J PHONE 324-2482 FAX: 324-2108 READING RECOVERY SPEECH THERAPY SPECIAL EDUCATION LAB ATTENDANT MEDIA CLERK ARTS CURRICULUM SPEC. KINDERGARTEN DRAMA SPECIALIST ELEMENTARY II ELEMENTARY ART SCHOOL NURSE ELEMENTARY V TECHNOLOGY SPECIALIST AUXILIARY TEACHER SECRETARY PRINCIPAL ELEMENTARY I ELEMENTARY I ELEMENTARY Ill KINDERGARTEN WASHINGTON, MACHERYL DENIS ELEMENTARY II WILLINGHAM, JOYCE D WOLFE, JANICE L. WOODS, BRENDA L ASST. PRINCIPAL ELEMENTARY I AIDE - SUPERVISION BRADY PRINCIPAL: ADA KEOWN BELL, COLETTE D. BRANTON, WILLIE L ELEMENTARY V SECURITY OFFICER BROOKS, JENNIFER MILDRED KINDERGARTEN BROOKS, JENNY TEACHER BROWN, DEBORAH A CUSTODIAN CAPOOT, JEANNE TEACHER CAPOOT, JEANNE A ELEMENTARY II COOK, BEVERLY A. SPECIAL EDUCATION CROMEDY, GERALDINE ELEMENTARY II CROSBY, SUSAN M MUSIC DANIEL, CHRISTIANN M GUIDANCE COUNSELOR DELONEY, RITA P AIDE DOOLITTLE, DOROTHY A ELEMENTARY IV DUGAN, FRANCES R KINDERGARTEN EDWARDS, NORMA CAROL CHILD NUTRITION FLANAGAN, VETA READING-SFA GILKEY, EVELYN D. AIDE GIVENS, LINDA PARAPROFESSIONAL GORDON, JANICE L SPECIAL EDUCATION GRIGGS, MARION LOUISE ELEMENTARY I HARRIS, BEVERLY CUSTODIAN - HEAD HARRIS, LUVENIA PARAPROFESSIONAL HIGHT, REBECCA R ELEMENTARY V HODGES, BARBARA L GIFTED/TALENTED HODGES, BARBARA L GIFTED \u0026amp; TALENTED HORNIBROOK, KAREN HOLLAND FOUR YR OLD TEACHER JAMES, CAROLYN A. AIDE JOHNSON, DELMA J ELEMENTARY Ill JONES, PAMELA K KINDERGARTEN KEOWN, ADA L ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL KING, LILA L AIDE LITTRELL, AIMEE BADEAUX SPEECH THERAPY MCNEIL, EILEEN ALTERNATIVE LEARNING NUNLEY, GLORIA A LIBRARIAN - ELEMENTARY OLIVER, SHELLY R ELEMENTARY Ill ROSE, SHERRYL ELEMENTARY I SCRUBBS, VERNA M ELEMENTARY 11 SHELLS, GENEVA S ENGLISH SEC. LANG. TIDWELL, PAULA CUSTODIAN TOLAND, BETH ALLISON SCHOOL NURSE TOLBERT, IRMA J KINDERGARTEN UWADINEKE, NNANTA C AIDE WHITE-BENNINGFIELD, JOANN PARAPROFESSIONAL WILLIAMS, SARAH M AIDE - SUPERVISION 7915 W MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK 72205 WOOD, MARY LOUISE YOUNG, EVA M PHONE 228-3065 FAX: ELEMENTARY I ELEMENTARY IV 228-3129 CARVER PRINCIPAL: DIANE BARKSDALE ACKER, NATASCH M ELEMENTARY V ACOTT, MARY LEE ELEMENTARY IV ARMSTRONG, HAYLEY KRISTINE ELEMENT ARY I BAKER, PATRICIA A AIDE BARKSDALE, MARY D ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL I BELOTTI, VIRGINIA M LIBRARIAN - ELEMENTARY BAYLES, K.Q. EARL CUSTODIAN BUCK, VIRGINIA S ELEMENTARY IV BUCKLEY, JOANN AIDE SUPERVISION BURCH, CLAIRE E AIDE SUPERVISION BURT, JOY LYNETTE ELEMENTARY IV CALLAWAY, ANN W SCHOOL NURSE CARTWRIGHT, JULIA D ELEMENTARY Ill CRUM, JANES ELEMENTARY (DEV) DANIEL, SUSAN J KINDERGARTEN DIMASSIMO, SUELLEN H MATHEMATICS SPEC. DOYNE, ANGELA K KINDERGARTEN GIBSON, SUSAN Y AIDE - SUPERVISION GLENN, BETTY ELEMENTARY V GLENN, LINDA F PUPIL PERSONNEL GRJMMITT, BONNIE S AIDE HAMILTON, CLAUDIA J ELEMENTARY (DEV) HANDY, ROSIL YN M AIDE - SUPERVISION HOLLIS, DEBRA A MEDIA CLERK HOOKER, MELBA J KINDERGARTEN HOUSE, HOLLY H ELEMENTARY I HUGHES, TERI LYNN MUSIC JACKSON,ROSE CUSTODIAN PART TIME JONES, BETTY L AIDE - SUPERVISION JOSEPH, JUNE D ELEMENTARY II MARBLEY,RAMONALYNN PHYSICAL ED. SPECIALIST MOORE, TIKISHA ELEMENTARY 11 MUNNS, PATRICIA A ELEMENTARY Ill PACE, TEATA D CURRICULUM SPECIALIST PENN, PRISCILLA J ELEMENTARY 111 RICHARDSON, TERESA L ELEMENT ARY I RICHARDSON, TRACY L SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL RODGERS, JUDY C AIDE ROLAND, MIL TON CUSTODIAN HEAD RUEHR, PAMELA W KINDERGARTEN RUNION, DIANNE C LANGUAGE ARTS SPEC. SCHILLING, PAULA B LAB ATTENDANT scan, EDWARD RAY ELEMENTARY V scan, YANAH ASST. PRINCIPAL 2100 E SIXTH ST LITTLE ROCK 72202 SHIELDS, HOLLY E SKUBAL, EUNICE L SPANN, MEREDITH J SUNDERMAN, ANGIE D THOMAS, VANNETTA J THOMASON,TAACYE VALUE, TERRIL WASHINGTON, KIMBERLY V WELLS, VERNITA FAYE WILLIAMS JR, ORVEN E WILLIAMS, DEBBIE WILLIAMS, MARY ANNE K WILLIAMS, RACHEL L WOODS Ill, ROBERT L WROTNY, GAYW. YARBROUGH, LAURIE J. PHONE 324-2460 FAX: 324-2421 ELEMENTARY II ELEMENT ARY I GIFTED \u0026amp; TALENTED ELEMENT ARY ART ELEMENTARY V COUNSELOR SPEECH THERAPY ELEMENTARY (DEV) GUIDANCE COUNSELOR ELEMENTARY (DEV) RESOURCE ELEMENTARY IV SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL CUSTODIAN - PART TIME ELEMENTARY Ill ELEMENTARY II CENTRAL 1500 SPARK ST PHONE 324-2300 PRINCIPAL: RUDOLPH HOWARD LITTLE ROCK 72202 FAX: 324-2308 ADAIR, GLADYS M ATTENDANCE SECRETARY FELLS, JACKIE SECURITY OFFICER ALLEN, FOSTER A SOCIAL STUDIES FIELDS, WILLIE J AIR FORCE JUNIOR ROTC ALVERSON JR, RAYMOND A ASST. LIBRARIAN FINLEY, RICKEY CUSTODIAN ANTHONY, LEE ANDREW ART FITZPATRICK JR, OLIVER SOCIAL STUDIES ARIKAWE, AKIN STEPHHEN voe. BUSINESS ED. FOWLER, RHONDA LEA ORAL COMMUNICATIONS BANKHEAD, CRAIG DEWAYNE SOCIAL STUDIES FUTRELL, BRENDA J voe. MARKETING COOR. BARNEY, NORMAN L CUSTODIAN GADBERRY, SARAH E SOCIAL STUDIES BEGGS, MELINDA J ENGLISH GADDY, HELEN B SPECIAL EDUCATION BEITH, MELINDA KALB ORAL COMMUNICATIONS GATES, KATHY GEOMETRY BERRY, TRACI GIRLS PE GAY, AGNOLIA BEATRICE ORAL COMMUNICATIONS BOSTIC, MARILYN RICHARD SOCIAL STUDIES GIUFFRIA, GREGORY L BAND DIRECTOR BOYETT, EDWARD B WORLD CULT/HISTORY GIVENS, WILLIE T CUSTODIAN - HEAD BRACK, ROBERT L MUSIC GOLDSBY, JR, WILMER D JOURNALISM BRANDON, ERIC R ENGLISH GRAVES, JESSICA A GUIDANCE COUNSELOR BROOKS,SAUNDRAJEAN ENGLISH GRAY, JOE A SOCIAL STUDIES BROWN, JAMES A SOCIAL STUDIES GRIDER, JENNIFER LEIGH SOCIAL STUDIES BROWN, KARYN INFIELD GEOMETRY GUY, KIM T SCHOOL NURSE CALLAWAY NORMAN M BOYS PE HALL-JONES, BETSY SPECIAL EDUCATION CARUTH, PHYLLIS V TRIGONOMETRY HAMMONS, KAREN A ENGLISH CHANDLER, JEANETTE ALGEBRA I HARGIS, ALISON C ENGLISH CLICK, MELEASA R. SECURITY OFFICER HEGGS, URSELLA W ATTENDANCE SECRETARY CLOUD JR, WILLIAM L BUILDING ENGINEER HICKMON, KEVIN L SECURITY OFFICER COLBURN, MELISSA A SOCIAL STUDIES HICKS, ROBIN R HOME ECONOMICS COLE, JENNIE B FRENCH HILL, JAMES PATRICK SPANISH COLE, LAURA CHEMISTRY HOLLADAY, KATHLEEN T ORAL COMMUNICATIONS COOPER, VIRGINIA R ART HOLMES, BOBBY E CUSTODIAN CORTINEZ, KATHERINE SOCIAL STUDIES HOOPER, BEYERL Y R ENGLISH COX, BERNIE L SOCIAL STUDIES HOWARD, RUDOLPH SECONDARY PRINCIPAL DADE, KIMBERLY TOY ORAL COMMUNICATIONS HUDSON, HAROLD CUSTODIAN DANIEL, BRANTON P PUPIL PERSONNEL HUNNICUTT, SUSAN ELIZABETH GERMAN DAVIS, KENNETH W SPECIAL EDUCATION HUNT, SAMUEL ALGEBRA I DAVIS, MABEL L HOME ECONOMICS IRETON, ANDREA LYNN FRENCH DEREE, DANA D SOCIAL STUDIES JOHNSON, LYNDA P GUIDANCE COUNSELOR DINGES, VICKIE SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL JOHNSON, WONDRUE M GUIDANCE COUNSELOR DONHAM, MELISSA C BIOLOGY JONES, XERLOTTA L voe. BUSINESS ED. DOWNING, WILLIAM RICHARD SCIENCE KEARNEY, LESLIE A GUIDANCE COUNSELOR DUMAS, ELAINE K LIBRARIAN KELLEY, JOHN W ASST. PRINCIPAL DUNHOO, KERVIS R CUSTODIAN ASST. HEAD LAMBERT, EVA DIANE ENGLISH EARLEYWINE, SONYA G ENGLISH LEAKS,ALVESTER CUSTODIAN EASTER, MARION 0 ENGLISH LIGON, MARIANNE WYNNE LATIN ENDERSON, DONALD WAYNE ART LOYA, SAMUEL T SPANISH EVANS, CAROLYN J SECRETARY PRINCIPAL MARIS, MARY ELIZABETH CHEMISTRY EVANS, KATHRYN S voe. BUSINESS ED. MAY, HAZELL GUIDANCE COUNSELOR FAUCETTE, MICHAEL ENGLISH MAYS, GRACIE C BIOLOGY CENTRAL PRINCIPAL: RUDOLPH HOWARD MCCUIEN, AMBER C MCDONALD, DOROTHY L MCGEE, KEITH MAURICE MCKINNEY, MICHAEL MCLENDON, JOANNE B MCMURRAY, VICTOR C MEADOWS, MARK E MEREDITH, SAMUEL MAURICE MILES, VALERIE MILLER, BRUCE W MILLER, ROBERT K MOORE, KENT L MORRIS, WILLIE C NASH, LANGEL NELSON, ANNIE L O'CONNOR, ROBERTS. OWEN, MARY ILA ENGLISH ENGLISH SOCIAL STUDIES CUSTODIAN HEALTH SOCIAL STUDIES SCIENCE BAND DIRECTOR SECRETARY - GUIDANCE ALGEBRA I ORAL COMMUNICATIONS PRE-ALGEBRA ASST. PRINCIPAL ENGLISH PBX OPERATOR SOCIAL STUDIES SPANISH PAGLIANITE, REBECCA ELIZABET ENGLISH PAIGE JR, WILLIE PAXTON, VERONICA J PEACE, PAMELA J PEYTON, EMMA J PIERCE, MAUREEN PORTER, LINDA M ROBERTS, JOHN A ROBERTSON JR, THOMAS A ROBINSON, CONSTANCE F ROBINSON, RENEE J ROSENBERGER, BETTY C ROSS, SUZANNE 0 ROWND, MARY C RUCKER, ELNORA L RUTLEDGE, MARILYN F SAINE, NATASHA SCHLESINGER, DEBRA S SELF, JENNIFER LYNN SEWARD, DARRELL L SHOFNER, KIRBY E SIEGEL, LARRY B SIEGEL, TERESA T SIMMONS, MARGUERITE M. SIMS, JEROME E SMITH, ANDREA SMITH, ANGELA M IND. TECH. ED. ENGLISH FRENCH BUSINESS EDUCATION HOME ECONOMICS GUIDANCE COUNSELOR ASST. BLDG. ENGINEER AIR FORCE JUNIOR ROTC voe. BUSINESS ED, JOURNALISM - INTERN MEDIA CLERK ASST. PRINCIPAL ENGLISH CUSTODIAN ALGEBRA I MATHEMATICS I ALGEBRA I PHYSICS BIOLOGY BIOLOGY SOCIAL STUDIES BOOKKEEPER SECURITY OFFICER SECURITY OFFICER SECURITY OFFICER ASST. PRINCIPAL 1500 SPARK ST LITTLE ROCK 72202 SMITH, FLOYD SMITH, PAUL J SNODGRASS, AMY L STAFFORD, BARBARA NELL STEADMAN, ANNICE STELL, LINDA M STRICKLAND, HELEN L. STRONG, SANDRA ANN STUEART, SAM J TEETER, ELLEN B TEARY, KAREN S TEARY, P. DAWN THOMPSON, JOY SALLEE THROWER, TORRENCE L. TINKLE, BETTY TROUTMAN, DENNIS TUCKER, CARLA LYNN WAGE, MARGERY B PHONE 324-2300 FAX: 324-2308 SECURITY OFFICER STUDENT ACTIVITY/CLUB BIOLOGY SPANISH BIOLOGY SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL ORAL COMMUNICATIONS MATHEMATICS I SOCIAL STUDIES BIOLOGY ART ENGLISH CHEMISTRY SCIENCE ATTENDANCE SECRETARY PHYSICS PBX OPERATOR SPANISH WALKER-RICHARDSON, LETHA Tl MATHEMATICS 11 WATSON, BILLY N WELCH, JANE K WHITE, JERRY D WHITEHORN, DANIEL W WILDER, BARBARA A WILLIAMS, BETTYE F WILLIAMS, STANLEY WILLIAMSON, MARGARET A WILLIS, EULA M WILSON, COURTNEY WILSON, DARRYL J WILSON, NANCY L WOMACK, JERRY ZAAICK, AMANDA KATHERYN MATHEMATICS I REGISTRAR CUSTODIAN ASST. PRINCIPAL ALGEBRA I IN SCHOOL SUSPENSION CIVICS SPECIAL EDUCATION voe. BUSINESS ED ORAL COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY ART CUSTODIAN SPEECH THERAPY CHICOT PRINCIPAL: JANE HARKEY ACLIN, KIMBERLY LEIGH ADKINS, JOHN ALLEN, SARAH WILKINSON BAILEY, DEVON BAILEY, JACK BAIRD, IDA B BAKER, LINDA MARIE BANKS, RICKEY D BARRE, FRANCES A BATES, EARNESTINE G BLYTHE, EDITH BRYANT, GEORGIE H BURGIN, JOHN S CARADINE, DONNA M CHU, KRISTINE STRICKER CONWAY, BERNARD L. CRAWFORD, CYNTHIA L CULBERTSON,PAMELA DAVIS, LANITAJ DOVE, WILLETTA L DRANE, WALTER H FIELDS, LEOLA H GALYEAN, NANETTE R GARCIA, MICALA DANIELLE GRIFFIN, LAURIE MICHELLE HARDESTY, SHANNON L HARKEY, JANE A HARPER.SAM HARRISON, DOUG HICKS, KATHLEEN F HILL, ALLEN DESHUN HOBBS, STEPHANIE Y HOLLINGSWORTH, JUDY A HOMAN, REBECCA L HOOD, KAYE HUGHES, ALICIA K. ISBELL, PAMELON J KERR, PAULA D KINSLOW, NANCY C LUCY.BRENDA MARTS, GLENDA RAE MATLOCK, MICHAEL MATLOCK, NANCY S MAYFIELD, CARLOS SPECIAL EDUCATION AIDE SUPERVISION SPEECH THERAPY AIDE PE INSTRUCTOR AIDE ELEMENTARY I MUSIC FOUR YR OLD TEACHER CHILD NUTRITION CHILD NUTRITION MGR. READING RECOVERY READING TEACHER AIDE KINDERGARTEN AIDE LIBRARIAN - ELEMENTARY AIDE ENG. SECOND LANG. AIDE SPECIAL ED. CUSTODIAN COMPUTER SPECIALIST TECHNOLOGY ED. SPEC. ELEMENTARY 11 ELEMENTARY I SPECIAL EDUCATION ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL CUSTODIAN SCHOOL NURSE SPECIAL EDUCATION AIDE - SUPERVISION CHILD NUTRITION ELEMENTARY Ill CHILD NUTRITION AIDE - SUPERVISION ELEMENTARY IV ENG. SECOND LANG. KINDERGARTEN FOUR YR OLD TEACHER MEDIA SECRETARY AIDE PHYSICAL THERAPIST GIFTED \u0026amp; TALENTED P.E. AIDE 11100 CHICOT RD MABELVALE 72103 McKINLEY, APRIL D. MEEKS, NANETTE RACHELLE MIMS, SANDRA J MIRANDA, CARLA J MONTGOMERY, SITAR MURPH, KATIE F PHILLIPS, ALICE POTEET, LISA B REYES, SILVIA C RICHARDS, CATHY A ROBERTS, CECIL J ROSE, SARAG SABO, DEBBIE L SANDERS, SHARI SMITH, DELWIN H SMITH, MELISSA K TEETER, PAMELA D TUCKER, LOUISE VINSON, SYLVERENE G WALKER, CONNIE S WALKER, EDITH M WALLER, MARYE WEEMS, TONIA L WELLS, JEANNIE L WILLIAMS, ERMA J WILLIAMS, KIMBERLY D WILLIAMS, NERESA LASHAY WILLIS, ZEDRIC A WOODHAM, MICHELE E PHONE 570-4062 FAX: 570-4194 ELEMENTARY V SPECIAL EDUCATION KINDERGARTEN AIDE ELEMENTARY V ENG. SECOND LANG. OCCUPATIONAL THER. SPEECH THERAPY CUSTODIAN CHILD NUTRITION CUSTODIAN HEAD ELEMENTARY V KINDERGARTEN COUNSELOR ASST. PRINCIPAL GUIDANCE COUNSELOR ELEMENTARY I SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL ELEMENTARY 11 SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL CHILD NUTRITION AIDE ELEMENTARY Ill ELEMENTARY 11 ELEMENTARY IV AIDE ELEMENTARY Ill AIDE - SUPERVISION SPECIAL EDUCATION CLOVERDALE ELEM PRINCIPAL: FREDERICK FIELDS BUETTNER, SALLY G CALDWELL, JENNIFER LYNN COKELEY, GWENDOLYN D COLLINS, CYNTHIA R DANESHMANDI, KATHRYN D DEDMON, NANCY A DOCKETT-WILSON, TAMMI Y ELLINGTON, TERRIES EPPERSON, BECKY J EWINGS, STEPHEN E FIELDS, FREDERICK L HALL, SHIRLEY L HOBBS, BARBARA A JARRETT, VERONICA NMN JOHNSON, DEBRA J. LACY, CARISSA JONITA LANGSTON, CALVIN L. MCCLAIN, MARION K MILLS, RICHARD M MOZELL, TIMOTHY J MURDOCK, STEPHEN K NELSON, ROSHUNDA L. NORMAN, CHERRY G PACE, KATIE L PALMER, KRISTY L. PENNINGTON, ALLEN EUGENE PHILLIPS, PENNY D ROGERS, CHARLENE I ROLAX, SHIRLEY A RUFFIN, CAROLYN JEAN SNOWDEN, SALLIE R TURNER, DARRL Y VANECKO, ALICE F VINSON, WILLIE JAMES WHITE, DISHOUNGH WILLIAMS, KELVIN WILSON, SANDRA D FOUR YR OLD TEACHER ELEMENTARY I ELEMENTARY I GIFTED \u0026amp; TALENTED SPEC ELEMENTARY (DEV) CUSTODIAN MUSIC SCHOOL NURSE KINDERGARTEN ELEMENTARY V ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL ELEMENTARY I CUSTODIAN HEAD ELEMENTARY Ill ELEMENT ARY TITLE I GUIDANCE COUNSELOR AIDE- P.E. KINDERGARTEN ELEMENTARY IV AIDE-ALT. LEARNING ELEMENTARY IV ATTENDANCE SECRETARY LIBRARIAN ELEMENTARY SPECIAL EDUCATION ELEMENTARY 11 ELEMENTARY V SECRETARY PRINCIPAL FOUR YR OLD TEACHER KINDERGARTEN SPEECH THERAPY ELEMENTARY Ill LAB ATTENDANT ELEMENTARY II ELEMENTARY IV ALTERNATIVE LEARNING AIDE ELEMENTARY V 6500 HINKSON RD LITTLE ROCK 72209 PHONE 570-4055 FAX: 570-4060 CLOVERDALE MIDDLE PRINCIPAL: DAVID PATTERSON ADAMS, REBECCA KAY ALLEN, CLARENCE ANDRESS, WILLIAM S BENNETT.A BROWN, ADRIENNE BROWN, JOHN P BYRD, BRENDA J CHAMBERS, REBECCA P COUNTS, CARLA M CURRY, JOANN DAVIS, MARCUS D DISHMAN, FREDDIE C DORER, ROBERT DOSS, GAILP EARNEST, ALICE F EDDINGS, AMINAH RASHIDAH EDDINGTON, KEENA B ENOCH, LYDIA L FIRESTONE, M. ANN FISHER, KENNETH L FLOWERS, GRACIE LEE OLOVER,MARSHALYNN GOLDSBY, LAVERNE G GFEEIII JONNIE GFIEEW GREGORY GREENLEE, KAREN ESTELLE GULLETT-BENNETT, TAMARA J HAMIL TON, ORAL YN S HARPER, GERALD LAURENCE HARRIS, ANNITHA J HARRIS, SHARON D HUDSON, SUSAN GAIL HUDSPETH, STACIE HARP JACKSON, CHRISTOPHER JACKSON, CHRISTOPHER JACKSON, ERIK TYRONNE JEFFERS, MICHAEL A JONES, EXAPHINE D JONES, JACK A JONES, JAMES L LAFFERTY, VICTOR W. LAMB, CAROLYN F LAUGHLIN, DONICA M MACKEY, ANNA BOOKKEEPER/SEC. AMERICAN HISTORY SOCIAL STUDIES SOCIAL STUDIES SPEECH THERAPY CUSTODIAN - PART TIME LIFE SCIENCE MATHEMATICS I ATTENDANCE SECRETARY SCHOOL NURSE BOYS \u0026amp; GIRLS PE CUSTODIAN SCI ENCE/MATH SPECIAL EDUCATION LIFE SCIENCE MATHEMATICS I ARKANSAS HISTORY REGISTRAR LIBRARIAN BUILDING ENGINEER ENGLISH SPECIAL EDUCATION GUIDANCE COUNSELOR SECURITY OFFICER CUSTODIAN - ASST. HEAD ASST. PRINCIPAL ENGLISH SOCIAL STUDIES PHYSICAL SCIENCE HOME ECONOMICS IN SCHOOL SUSPENSION ENGLISH ENGLISH AIDE - SPECIAL ED. SUPERVISION AIDE voe. CAREER ORIENT. PHYSICAL SCIENCE ART GUIDANCE COUNSELOR CUSTODIAN ENG. SECOND LANG. ASST PRINCIPAL SPECIAL EDUCATION ENGLISH VIII 6300 HINKSON RD LITTLE ROCK 72209 MARTIN, DUNCAN ERAC MCFADDEN.CHARLES MEDLOCK, JANET ANN MITCHELL, ANITA MARIE MOSBY, JONATHAN MUHAMMAD, NAJMAH B NESMITH, ESTELLA PACE, MARTHA V PATTERSON, DAVID H PENNINGTON, JOHN WAYNE PERSON, PAMELA I POORE', PATRICIA A PORTER, JEREL RALEY, BEVERLY A ROY, PORTIA SCHUTTE, SARAH CATHERINE SLOAN, DEBRA R. SMITH, SHAMEKA LYNN STARLING, LILLIAN L STEWART, PRINCESS A TAYLOR, TRAVIS F TURNER, TERRY D WALDROP, DEANA JO WASHINGTON, DWIGHT B WHITTAKER, NONA WICKLIFFE, ALICE E WILLIAMS, BOBBIE JEAN WILLIAMS, CRISTEN MICHELE WOMACH, FREIDA PHONE 570-4085 FAX: 570-4011 SECURITY OFFICER LEARNING FOUNDATIONS SPECIAL EDUCATION voe. BUSINESS ED. HEALTH/P.E. CIVICS MATHEMATICS I MEDIA CLERK SECONDARY PRINCIPAL HEALTH READING SPECIALIST ENGLISH CUSTODIAN SPECIAL EDUCATION ENGLISH ENGLISH ART COMPUTER LITERACY ENG. SECOND LANG. ENGLISH BAND DIRECTOR READING MATHEMATICS I CUSTODIAN - HEAD ENGLISH VI MATHEMATICS I ENGLISH ENGLISH ENGLISH VIII DODD PRINCIPAL: FAITH MCLAUGHLIN ABERNATHY, RAYMOND CUSTODIAN - HEAD BUCHANAN, BELINDA COMPUTER BURTON, JENNIFER AIDE - SUPERVISION CHAMBERS, SHERRYL. ELEMENTARY II CROSBY, KELVIN AIDE DAVIS, PHILLIP L GIFTED \u0026amp; TALENTED DAWKINS, CAROLYN AIDE DILDAY, JENNIFER E ELEMENTARY V FLEMING, BRENDA H ELEMENTARY IV FLEMING, DEODIS D SPEECH THERAPY GADDY, GENEA LACRESCHE FOUR YR OLD TEACHER GOLDMON, YVETTE D ELEMENTARY V HARE, VALERIE T KINDERGARTEN HARRISON, DOUGLAS R SCHOOL NURSE HUFFMAN, COURTNEY KINDERGARTEN JACKSON, ANTHONY L AIDE JAMES, PHILITA LAJUA ELEMENTARY Ill JEFFERSON, CYNTHIA MUSIC KENNEDY, BARBARA A LIBRARIAN - ELEMENTARY KNAPP, TERESA LYNN ELEMENTARY Ill LOWE, MARTHA O GUIDANCE COUNSELOR LUCY, BRENDA F MEDIA CLERK MCLAUGHLIN, FAITH R ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL MEEKS, JULIE A ELEMENTARY I MITCHELL, BEVERLY S SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL MOORE, PAMELA AIDE RAGLAND, CALVIN CUSTODIAN RAINES, ANNIE M ELEMENTARY I REED, DEMETRIC SPECIAL EDUCATION ROBINSON. LISA CHILD NUTRITION SCHOUWEILER, SHAWN DENISE SPECIAL EDUCATION SURRATT, BARBARA CHILD NUTRITION THOMAS, JIMMIE D CHILD NUTRITION MGR. TURNHAM, YALE THOMAS SPECIAL EDUCATION YEAGER, JUDITH A READING TEACHER 6423 STAGECOACH RD LITTLE ROCK 72204 PHONE 455-7430 FAX: 455-7427 DUNBAR PRINCIPAL: DEBORAH BERRY ACRE, GLENDON L ADKINS, CAROLYNE RUTH AVERY, BELINDA AX, EDITH R BACON, JOHN C BELL, JERRY LERONE BEMIS, MONTE L BERRY, DEBORAH P BLACKSHER, RODERICK L BROWN, MICHAEL L BURGESS, RYAN BURKS, ZACHARY R CARTER, LINDA CHILDS, MONIQUE CLARK, ALICE Z CLAYBORN, NATHAN L COLE, BETTYE EARNEST CORBIN, JENNIFER DAVIS, BABBYE R DEAN, OSCAR L DICKERSON, BOBBIE J DORN, EVELYN DUNN, RHONDA T EARNHEART, STEFANIE M. ELLEDGE, JENNIFER JANE FEYEN, MARIBETH FEYEN, MARY ELIZABETH FINNEY, VICKIE D. FLYNN, TYRI ANN FORNERO, DAN K FOSTER, MATTHEW JOHN GAINES, SARA E GAINES, SARA E. GIBBS, CHARLES D. GOSS, TERI D. HARRIS, BEVERLY HART, LILLIAN RENITA HENDERSON, ERIC B HOBBS, LAWRENCE E HONEA, ALICE J HOWARD, MARGARET A IZARD, RHONDA B JACKSON, GERTIE B JACKSON, HARRY B GUIDANCE COUNSELOR voe. CAREER ORIENT. CUSTODIAN - HEAD INTL. STUDIES SPEC. ASST. PRINCIPAL SOCIAL STUDIES READING/WRITING SECONDARY PRINCIPAL SECURITY OFFICER CUSTODIAN - ASST. HEAD ASST. PRINCIPAL IN SCHOOL SUSPENSION CHILD NUTRITION CLINICIAN REGISTRAR PHYS. ED./ HEAL TH PRE-ALGEBRA FRENCH SPECIAL EDUCATION IND. TECH. ED. CHILD NUTRITION MGR. CUSTODIAN ASST. PRINCIPAL SOCIAL STUDIES ARKANSAS HISTORY ARTVI ART SECURITY OFFICER ENGLISH DATA PROC/COMP TECH ENGLISH MATHEMATICS I MATHEMATICS GERMAN MATH TEACHER SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL BAND DIRECTOR PHYSICAL SCIENCE BUILDING ENGINEER ATTENDANCE SECRETARY CUSTODIAN GIFTED \u0026amp; TALENTED SPEC HOME ECONOMICS CUSTODIAN - PART TIME 1100 WRIGHT AVE LITTLE ROCK 72206 JAMES, CLEASTER MARIE JAMES, MARLO JAMES, MARTHA M JONES, KATRINA YVONNE KEARNEY-WEST, MAPLE J PHONE 324-2440 FAX: ENGLISH SPANISH LIBRARIAN EARTH SCIENCE ENGLISH 324-2439 LANCASTER-BLANKENSHIP, CAYS ENGLISH LENSING, BARBARA LENSING, BARBARA L. LOGAN, ANDREW 0 MCDONALD, THOMAS A MCLEROY, CHANDRA RENEE MIMS, MARY H. MORGAN, LATASHA D. MUNDY, SAM T NEWTON, KENNETH NOBLE, HELEN OLDS, ARTHUR C PATTERSON, DAMIAN PATTERSON, DAMIAN L PEARSON, DOROTHY POWELL, DARRYL J REDMON, BEVERLY RICHARDSON, JIMMY L RIDDLE, BRENDA J RIZZARDI, MARCIA M RODGERS, CLAUDIA A ROMNEY, ANGELA GAIL SCOTT, BETH SHAVERS, GREGORY B SIMPSON, REBECCA J SKOTKO, FRANCINE S SLATER, JOYCE A SLOAN, SUSAN RACHEL SMITH, JANICE SMITH, SUSAN M SPRINGER, ROBERT A STUFF, AMYL WARNER. CHARLOTTE WATSON, CHARLES E WEBB, BECKY S WEST, CHUCK WHITTEN, PEGGY R ENGLISH ENGLISH PHYS. ED./ HEAL TH ORCHESTRA ENGLISH SOCIAL STUDIES VI MEDIA CLERK ENGLISH MATHEMATICS I CHILD NUTRITION LATIN MATH TEACHER ENGLISH CHILD NUTRITION ENGLISH ENGLISH CUSTODIAN SCIENCE ENGLISH PHYSICAL EDUCATION SPANISH SPECIAL EDUCATION SPECIAL EDUCATION SOCIAL STUDIES ART GUIDANCE COUNSELOR LIFE SCIENCE CHILD NUTRITION EARTH SCIENCE MATHEMATICS I SCHOOL NURSE CHILD NUTRITION MATHEMATICS I VOCAL MUSIC U.S. HISTORY ENGLISH FAIR PARK PRINCIPAL: DR. SAMUEL BRANCH ARYEE, JESSICA R. BRANCH, SAMUEL BROWN, REBECCA A CAMP, WINNIE S CHILCOTE, MARY S COLE, CAROLYN COTHRAN, DEBORAHJANE DELOZIER, MARY GAIL EDWARDS, SANDRA KAY GOACHER, TINA D. ISUM, MARGARET V JAMES, CHARLOTTE A JOHNSON, KEVIN LEWIS, LEE E MCCLELLAN, DALE A MCGUIRE, JOSEPH MONTGOMERY, CHRISTOPHER MONTGOMERY, LUCILLE PEARSON, BOYCE PETR UK, MARILYN H POWELL, ROSIE M PUSCH, LISA M REED, DELIA RICE, OPAL E RILEY, LEAH A RUSSELL, TAJUANA SARDIN, KIMBERLY KAY SHERWOOD, SHERRY STONE, LINDA G TURNER, MARILYN E - ELEMENTARY II ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL KINDERGARTEN SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL ELEMENTARY Ill CHILD NUTRITION MGR. FOUR YR OLD TEACHER ELEMENTARY I AIDE SPECIAL EDUCATION LIBRARIAN - ELEMENTARY ELEMENTARY IV AIDE KINDERGARTEN GUIDANCE COUNSELOR CUSTODIAN CUSTODIAN - HEAD AIDE MUSIC SPEECH THERAPY ELEMENTARY I FOUR YR OLD TEACHER AIDE - SUPERVISION ELEMENTARY II ELEMENTARY (DEV) GIFTED/TALENTED ELEMENTARY IV ELEMENTARY V AIDE - SUPERVISION ELEMENTARY Ill 616 N HARRISON LITTLE ROCK 72205 PHONE 671-6260 FAX: 671-6205 I I I I FOREST HEIGHTS 5901 EVERGREEN PHONE 671-6390 PRINCIPAL: ELOUISE HUDSON LITTLE ROCK 72205 FAX: 671-6387 ALEXANDER, BEN E CUSTODIAN LANG, CURTIS GIRLS PE ALFORD, COREAN M. PARAPROFESSIONAL MAGEE, MILDRED AMERICAN HISTORY ALLEN, SHERION BOOKKEEPER MAYS, ALVIN MATHEMATICS ANDERS, AMY LEIGH ENGLISH MCCREE, GINA F LEARNING FOUNDATIONS BAKER,MERRIC SCHOOL NURSE MCFADDEN, SANDRA L BOYS \u0026amp; GIRLS PE BASSA, KRISTI SHEREE SPECIAL EDUCATION MIGNOT-BUGEYA, CHRISTINE NM FRENCH BAYLARK, ROBIN N TYPING/KEYBOARDING MUELLER, CATHERINE J SPECIAL EDUCATION BEASLEY, DYANN NMN DATA PROC/COMP TECH. NUNIS, HAROLD S AMERICAN HISTORY BRIGGS, BOBBY C CUSTODIAN PARKER, TARSHALAFAYE SCIENCE BRISCOE 111, JOSEPH W PHYSICAL SCIENCE PEARSON, CHARLOTTE DENEEN AIDE BUCKELEW, MACKIE G BOYS \u0026amp; GIRLS PE PITTS, GAIL G ASST. PRINCIPAL CAFFEY, BARBARA S AIDE POOLE, THOMAS EARTH SCIENCE CARR, JEFF F SOCIAL STUDIES PRAY, BEVERLY DIANNE MATHEMATICS I CARR, PATRICIA V. FAMILY/CONSUMER SCI. PRICE, LILLIE MAE LEARNING FOUNDATIONS CHUNYO, JUDITH LINGLE SPECIAL EDUCATION RELFORD, MELVIA J SPECIAL EDUCATION COBBS, MARY J ENGLISH RUNDELL, MYRNA J DATA PROC/COMP TECH. COTABISH, ALICIA ANN LIFE SCIENCE SHELMAN, SARAH E REGISTRAR CROMEDY, VERNON voe. CAREER ORIENT. SHERRILL, LYNDA LORETTA BOOKKEEPER/SEC. CROSS, NANCY B ENGLISH SHOEMAKER, MARY E ENGLISH CROSS, WALTER JAMES AIDE INSTRUCTIONAL SMITH, ALMA F GUIDANCE COUNSELOR DAVIS, BARBARA T SPECIAL EDUCATION SMITH, DIONNE MICHAELA LEARNING FOUNDATIONS DODSON, VINCENT R IN SCHOOL SUSPENSION SMITH, LLOYD A CUSTODIAN DUNCAN, EDWARD A BAND DIRECTOR SMYLY, TONI M ENGLISH DUNLAP, DORIS D ART SNEED, MARY ELLEN SPECIAL EDUCATION ELLISON, SHANNON CUSTODIAN STEWARD, TRACIE DAWN GEOGRAPHY FERGUSON, TERESA MICHELLE LIFE SCIENCE STEWART, EDDIE J. SECURITY OFFICER FLETCHER, JOHN SAMUEL CUSTODIAN HEAD SUTTON, KENNETH H LIBRARIAN FORE, LISA K ENGLISH TABOR, GINA L ENGLISH FUNDERBURG, CELESTE LEE SPEECH PATHOLOGY TAYLOR, DIANNE F READING GREEN II, TROY W BOYS PE THOMASON, MARIAN M FINE ARTS (ART) GRINAGE, KIMBERLY L ENGLISH THOMPSON, LAWRENCE CUSTODIAN - ASST. HEAD HOLLOWAY, GLENN MATHEMATICS I TODD, LINDA E SPANISH HUBBARD, TINA D CUSTODIAN TURNER, ALVIN D MATHEMATICS I HUDSON, ELOUISE J SECONDARY PRINCIPAL WILLIAMS, BRENDA M. PARAPROFESSIONAL JAMES, TERRIE J MEDIA CLERK WILLIAMS, KATHY L MATHEMATICS I JOHNSON, ELLIOTT JERALD SCIENCE WILLIAMS, MINDY LUE ENGLISH JOHNSON, MARILYN F SPECIAL EDUCATION WILLIAMS, NORA L. ALTERNATIVE LEARNING JOHNSON, TONYA N ENGLISH WILLIAMSON, WANDA M SOCIAL STUDIES JOHNSON, VIVIAN E MUSIC WISE, STEVEN SCOTT CIVICS JONES, TAMARA B SECURITY OFFICER ZAKRZEWSKI, MERRY C MATHEMATICS I JONES-TAYLOR, SHAROLYN M ENGLISH KEYES, NANCY L GUIDANCE COUNSELOR KIRBY, AUDREY A DATA PROC/COMP TECH. KNIGHTEN, REGINALD ASST. PRINCIPAL I, FOREST PARK PRINCIPAL: THERESA KETCHER BALLARD, JENNIFER R. ELEMENTARY V BATT, KATHY M. AIDE SUPERVISION BAUMAN, SUSAN F ELEMENTARY 11 BLOOD, SHELIA L. AIDE - SUPERVISION BOYCE, MARY L LIBRARIAN ELEMENTARY COLEMAN, ELEANOR R GUIDANCE COUNSELOR COMIC, BELINDA F AIDE COURTNEY, THERESAJ ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL CUNNINGHAM, SHAWNTELL AIDE - INSTRUCTIONAL CUNNINGHAM, SHAWNTELL D AIDE DARBY, EVELYN J. AIDE - SUPERVISION DILLARD, CAROLYN ANN ELEMENTARY IV FINLEY, CORA M AIDE - SUPERVISION GESTAUT, HELEN F ELEMENTARY Ill GWIN, LISA K ELEMENTARY II HUNT, MARIETTA S MUSIC ISROFF, KIMBERLY K ELEMENTARY I JACKSON, GWENDOLYN M CUSTODIAN PART TIME JONES, GREGORY K ELEMENT ARY II LAUGHLIN, KRISTEN S GIFTED \u0026amp; TALENTED LINEBERGER, KATHY JANE ELEMENTARY IV LUSBY, MARY B SECRETARY PRINCIPAL MACHEN, JANET A ELEMENTARY Ill MCBRIDE, BARBARA L SPEECH THERAPY MOLDEN, HOMER L CUSTODIAN HEAD MOORE, CYNTHIA C KINDERGARTEN MYERS, SHANNON MILLER ELEMENTARY IV OAASIM, MUNEERAH SPECIAL EDUCATION SCHERER, PATRICIA H GIFTED \u0026amp; TALENTED SCOTT, TINA D. P. E. SIGNAIGO, CYNTHIA L KINDERGARTEN WENGER, CAROLYN J ELEMENT ARY I WILLIAMS, DEBBIE J. ELEMENT ARY I WILSON, ANGELIA CUSTODIAN WILSON, GLORIA p ELEMENTARY V 1600 N TYLER LITTLE ROCK 72207 PHONE 671-6267 FAX: 671-6315 I I \\ FRANKLIN PRINCIPAL: ETHEL DUNBAR ANDERSON, BARRY L ANDERSON, TARIJEAN AUSTIN, SHARON K BASS, JAMES BOWIE, JACQUELINE BURNETT, TARNEISHA L BUTLER, BRENDA J CAMPBELL, SHERRY SHARMA CARROLL, GLORIA CARTER, KAREN A COCKRELL, BRENDA J COOPER, MARQUIS LAVALLE CRENSHAW, ORAL CROW, ANN C DUNBAR, ETHEL B ERWIN, THOMA FINLEY, CALVIN W FRANKLIN, GAYLON J GADDY, ELLISTINE GERHARD, EDITH MARIE GILES, ALMEDA GRAY, CAROLYN W GRAY, LOU A HALL, CHARLES K. HAMPTON, VALDA DENICE HARPER-ROUSE, VALERIE J HARRISON, FRANKIE JO HOLLEY, DENISE HOOD, MARTHA CAROLYN HOOVER, SIN-CHUN HU JACKSON JR, JOSEPH JACKSON, GLORIA J JACKSON, MEKEICHA LENORE JACKSON, SHERYL B JONES, EVERETT L JORDAN, SHELIA D LAWSON, KARON Q LEONARD, SARA MEGHAN MACON, BETTIE J MCINTOSH, SANDRA G MCNULTY, LEANNE MOORE, MICHELLE LANEE MOSS, NATRASHA S MYRICK, AMANDA LEANNE AIDE - INSTRUCTIONAL ELEMENTARY I AIDE - SUPERVISION CUSTODIAN CHILD NUTRITION AIDE - SUPERVISION ELEMENTARY I ELEMENTARY II AIDE ASST. PRINCIPAL CHILD NUTRITION ELEMENTARY IV GUIDANCE COUNSELOR MUSIC ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL ELEMENTARY Ill ELEMENTARY PHYS. ED. AIDE ELEMENTARY IV ELEMENTARY V ELEMENTARY V GIFTED \u0026amp; TALENTED ELEMENTARY II SECURITY OFFICER AIDE - INSTRUCTIONAL SOCIAL WORKER ELEMENT ARY IV LITERACY COACH AIDE SPECIAL EDUCATION ELEMENTARY V WRITING TO READ LAB ELEMENTARY Ill READING RECOVERY CUSTODIAN CHILD NUTRITION ELEMENTARY ART ELEMENTARY Ill CHILD NUTRITION ATTENDANCE SECRETARY FOUR YR OLD TEACHER KINDERGARTEN AIDE - SUPERVISION KINDERGARTEN 1701 S HARRISON LITTLE ROCK 72204 NEAL, LINDA K OLIVER, SANDRA K PARISH-ACKLIN, PATRICIA PHILLIPS, SANDRA POLIFRONE, JENNIFER M PORTER-COLE, GWENDOLYN J POWELL-GLASON, DIANNE M RIGGINS, LINDA J ROBINSON, MARLENE M ROLLINS, HELEN L SAMS, WILLIE M SIMMONS, MILDRED LARITA SIMPSON, CONNIE K SLATER, LEROY SMITH, BEYERL YA SMITH, PAULA L. STAGGERS, ANDREW STUBBLEFIELD, GERTRUDE L STUCKEY, YINKA 0 THORNTON, JOSEPHINE TRIMBLE, BETTY J WARE, KAREN J WATSON, M(STI MATTICE WHITE, CLARISSA DENISE WHITE, JOA WILLIAMS, SHAWN A WINSTON, JANE A WITTENBURG, AMY 0 YOUNG. ELIZABETH PHONE 671-6380 FAX: 671-6318 LIBRARIAN - ELEMENTARY WRITING TO READ LAB FOUR YR OLD TEACHER LAB ATTENDANT KINDERGARTEN AIDE - SPECIAL ED. ELEMENTARY IV WRITING TO READ LAB SPECIAL EDUCATION SCHOOL NURSE AIDE SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL ELEMENTARY I AUXILIARY TEACHER AIDE READING RECOVERY AIDE ELEMENTARY V ELEMENTARY 11 CUSTODIAN - HEAD CUSTODIAN PUPIL PERSONNEL ELEMENTARY I ELEMENTARY 111 MEDIA CLERK SPECIAL EDUCATION FOUR YR OLD TEACHER SPEECH THERAPY CHILD NUTRITION MGR. FULBRIGHT 300 PLEASANT VALLEY DR PHONE 228-3080 PRINCIPAL: DEBORAH MITCHELL LITTLE ROCK 72212 FAX: 228-3148 ~ BARRETT, ROHETTIE M AIDE WILLIAMS, ETHEL L REGISTRAR BEARD, NATOSHA MARIA SPECIAL EDUCATION WILLIAMS, IRISH A ELEMENTARY V BLACKBURN, CYNTHIA LYNN ELEMENTARY I WILSON, ALVIN CUSTODIAN BLUE, KYLA NIKITA AIDE SUPERVISION WILSON, ROBERT L CUSTODIAN BUFFORD, SHERRILL A SPECIAL EDUCATION WOOLLY, CAROL J MUSIC COOPER, DOROTHY M KINDERGARTEN WYATT, GAY KINDERGARTEN CULVERSON, PATRICIA A AIDE DAVIS, WAVERLY Y ELEMENTARY Ill DOWNING, LISA LEIGH SPECIAL EDUCATION FAUSETT, LYNDA M KINDERGARTEN FENTRY, KIM LYNETTE AIDE SUPERVISION GADDIE, OLIVIA S ELEMENTARY V GRAY, PEGGY A ELEMENTARY II GRIFFITH, JERRI LEEANN SPEECH THERAPY HAMMOND, EILEEN A GIFTED \u0026amp; TALENTED HARRIS, SHARON R ELEMENTARY 111 HARRISON, LISA D ELEMENTARY Ill HENTHORNE, MELINDA ELEMENTARY I HERNDON, LILLIAN E. AIDE SUPERVISION HONORE'SMITH, KAREN P ELEMENTARY IV HURD, JACKIENEL KINDERGARTEN JACKSON, JOHNNY L CUSTODIAN HEAD JACKSON, RICHARD A CUSTODIAN PART TIME JOHNSON, BETH MYERS LIBRARIAN ELEMENTARY LANEHART, FRAN S MEDIA CLERK LEWIS, ALICIA T AIDE LONG, KRISTI A AIDE SPECIAL ED. MITCHELL, DEBORAH A ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL NEIKIRK, MATTHEW B ELEMENT ARY II NESMITH, JOE L AIDE PADILLA, PAULA A GIFTED \u0026amp; TALENTED PENN, CARA L ELEMENTARY II PERRY, LUCIA G SCHOOL NURSE PITTMAN, CHARLOTTE M AIDE RAND, ALICE C LAB ATTENDANT ROBERTO, LOIS C AIDE ROBINSON, STEVEN R ELEMENTARY V SHUFFIELD, KELLY L FOUR YR OLD TEACHER SMITH, RHONDA F GUIDANCE COUNSELOR SPEARMAN, KARA R SPEECH THERAPY THOMPSON, AMY DANIELLE ELEMENTARY IV WALTON, EDNA F SECRETARY PRINCIPAL WATSON, THELMA p ELEMENTARY IV WESTLAKE, BEVERLY A ELEMENTARY I GEYER SPRINGS PRINCIPAL: DONNA HALL BABB, MISTY GARRETT BRIGHT, GLADIS BUEHLING, CYNTHIA G BURCH, STACY ANN CAVANESS, DWIGHT L COX, MYRENE A CUNNINGHAM, LOIS DIXON, MICHELLE DOERPINGHAUS, SHERRI L. DUMAS, JOSEPHINE FOLSOM, BARBARA J FRAZIER, RAYMOND U GILBERT, JEAN H GRAVES, INGRID M HALL, DONNA R HARDESTY, PATTY J HUGHES, SHARONDA MARSHA JONES, MARY J JONES, STEPHANIE L KOON, BETTY R PARKER, LINDA F PENNY, JACQUELINE F PUCKETT, PAIGE C RAY, KAREN D REYNOLDS,BARBARAJ RICHARD, SHONNA D ROSS, PATRICIA M SALAZAR, LORETTA D SHEPHERD, LAURA A SIMPSON, ANGIE M SMITTIE, DAISIE L STUBBLEFIELD, EVELYN D THAMES, TYRONZA L WHITE, ERICIA D WHITTAKER, NONA M WILKINSON, SANDRA L ELEMENTARY I CUSTODIAN MUSIC SPEECH THERAPY CUSTODIAN MEDIA CLERK AIDE SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL SCHOOL NURSE READING TEACHER AIDE - SUPERVISION AIDE SPECIAL EDUCATION LIBRARIAN - ELEMENTARY ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL ELEMENTARY II ELEMENTARY 111 LAB ATTENDANT ELEMENTARY IV ELEMENTARY II GUIDANCE COUNSELOR ELEMENTARY Ill KINDERGARTEN ELEMENTARY V AIDE AIDE KINDERGARTEN AIDE FOUR YR OLD TEACHER FOUR YR OLD TEACHER AIDE SUPERVISION ELEMENTARY V ELEMENTARY I ELEMENTARY IV GIFTED \u0026amp; TALENTED KINDERGARTEN 5240 MABELVALE PIKE LITTLE ROCK 72209 PHONE 570-4160 FAX: 570-4170 GIBBS PRINCIPAL: FELICIA HOBBS BAKER, KAYREN G BLOME, CAROLYN H BRADFORD, CICELY BRANCH, SUSANIRENE BRYANT JUDYE CLARK, TINESHA COOPER, DEIDRE DENNIS, ANGELA GRACE EVANS, LEILA Y FORTE, REGINALD FORTNER, KAREN K GONTERMAN, VICKI L HAMILTON, NANCY P HERNDON, SHARON R HESTIR, SUSAN J HOBBS, FELICIA L HOLMES, GLORIA MAY HUFFMAN, KELLY HURD, ANN J JACKSON, PAMELA JOHNSON, JILLANE DEE JORWALL, PATRICIA PATTEN KIDD, KRISTY ATKINSON KIMBALL, BEATRIZ M LAVEY, CATHERINE L LUZZI, PATRICIA C MARTIN, MARY PAULINE MATLOCK, GWEN MILLER, MELANIE p MITCHELL, NANCY B PURVIS, SUSAN T REYNOLDS, REBA F ROBINSON, SUSIE A SHUMATE, CARLE SKARDA, TONI L SMITH, CATHY STRONG, YOLANDA M TALLEY SHIRLEY A TARKINGTON SUSAN D THOMPSON, FLORA DEAN WALTERS, ALICE H MUSIC ELEMENTARY I ELEMENTARY Ill GIFTED \u0026amp; TALENTED GUIDANCE COUNSELOR AIDE - INSTRUCTIONAL AIDE - SUPERVISION SPANISH SPEECH THERAPY AIDE - SUPERVISION TECHNOLOGY SPECIALIST INTL. STUDIES SPECIALIST PHYSICAL ED. SPECIALIST SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL ELEMENTARY II ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL AIDE - SUPERVISION ELEMENTARY II READING SCHOOL NURSE ELEMENTARY IV FRENCH ELEMENTARY IV ELEMENTARY Ill LIBRARIAN - ELEMENTARY ELEMENTARY V LAB ATTENDANT AIDE - SUPERVISION ELEMENTARY I SPECIAL EDUCATION ART ASST, PRINCIPAL ELEMENTARY V CUSTODIAN - HEAD ELEMENTARY I AIDE SUPERVISION AIDE KINDERGARTEN MATHEMATICS KINDERGARTEN KINDERGARTEN 1115 W 16TH ST LITTLE ROCK 72202 PHONE 324-2490 FAX: 324-0541 HALL PRINCIPAL: VERNON SMITH ADAMS, JERALDINE T AGEE, MARGARET ANN ALLGOOD, EMMA J SPECIAL EDUCATION SCHOOL NURSE AIDE ANDERS, MARIBETH CHANCELLO ART ANTHONY, PRISCILLA FAYE ARINGTON, JOANN SPECIAL EDUCATION CAREEMECH. BUS. ED. BAILEY, ROSALYN S HEALTH BANKS, WANDA F ATTENDANCE SECRETARY BAXLEY, MARY A GUIDANCE COUNSELOR BELFORD Ill, JOHN H GEN. COOP. ED. COOR. BELL, LINDA K SOCIAL STUDIES BENTON, LINDA G CUSTODIAN BEST, JOAN B MATHEMATICS BLACKNALL, REVA J voe. BUSINESS ED. BONA, PATRICIA C TRIGONOMETRY/CALC. BOSTIC, KELVIN BUSINESS BOURLAND, CREIGHTON ANDRE BOYS PE/HEALTH BOYLE, JULIA L GUIDANCE COUNSELOR BRANCH, KARON LYNN ORAL COMMUNICATIONS BRANT, DENNIS R PHYSICS BREWSTER, MARILYN J ASST. PRINCIPAL BROWN, ALICE W. LATIN/FRENCH BURKEPILE, BILL L ALGEBRA II BURNETTE, DENNIS R ENGLISH BYNUM, LARRY D BUILDING ENGINEER CARTER, CAROLYN L ENGLISH CIRKS, GEORGE E HEALTH/COACH CLAY, SHARON REGISTRAR COLLIER, JR, RICKY L. SECURITY OFFICER COLLINS, JUDYTHE L COOK, KATHY L COOMBS, LINDA C COOPER, MONICA LYNN CRESS, CAMILLE P DANIELS, JOHN STEVEN DAVIS, LAVERA J DIGGS, JENNIFER WALKER DUNN, VALERIE MICHELLE EASTER, ELIZABETH L FALLS, JACQUELINE A FINLEY, CLARENCE B FLOWERS, ROBERT E GAGE, MARY J GARNER, SUSAN K MATHEMATICS II SPECIAL EDUCATION ATTENDANCE SECRETARY HEAL TH/COACH BIOLOGY ISS/COACH CAREEMECH. BUS. ED. ENGLISH ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ENGLISH SCIENCE BOYS \u0026amp; GIRLS PE CUSTODIAN - PART TIME ENGLISH JOURNALISM 6700 \"H\" STREET LITTLE ROCK 72205 GATLIN, BERTE GRAVES, DON K GREEN, CHRISTINE GUNTERMAN, CHRIS D. GUY, MARYS PHONE 671-6200 FAX: 671-6207 SECURITY OFFICER AMERICAN HISTORY AMERICAN HISTORY P.E. ENGLISH HANSBERRY-HARRISON, BETTY R LIBRARIAN - SECONDARY HAWKINS, MATTHEW BAYLESS ENGLISH HAYGOOD, YVONNE J CUSTODIAN HENDRIX, RONALD E CUSTODIAN - PART TIME HILL, GENEVA CUSTODIAN HINES, MARY ANN voe. BUSINESS ED. HOLDEN JR, WILLIES CUSTODIAN - HEAD HOLLOWAY, KIMBERLY LATRICE SCIENCE HOOKS, JAMES W CUSTODIAN - ASST. HEAD HOPE, BARBARA W BOOKKEEPER HORTON, MARCUS D. SECURITY OFFICER HOWARD, CAROLINE D voe. BUSINESS ED. HOWARD, KATHY AIDE HUDSON, SHELIA A ALGEBRA JACKSON, MICHELLE DENISE MATHEMATICS JARMON, MYRA M SPECIAL EDUCATION JERNIGAN, RITAJ ALGEBRA II JONES, LINDA S GUIDANCE COUNSELOR KING, MARON VALDEZ SOCIAL STUDIES KING, SUSAN L ART LASKER, ALBERTA ENGLISH MADDISON, SUE ENGLISH MALONE, HOSEA D BIOLOGY MANTELS, ALITA I SPANISH/ACT PREP. MARSH, EDWARD W GEOMETRY/ALGEBRA MARSHALECK, 111, WALTER ANTHO PHYSICS MAYS, SHERRIES COOR. CAREER ED. MCCANN, CONNIE SUZANNE MCKASKLE, SONJA F. MCKINNON, LONA GAIL MCTYER, JR., DONALD MEADORS, JAMES EDWARD MEADOWS, JANE S MILLOWAY, MELINDA B MOORE, KENNETH MOORE, MARCUS R MOSBY, SHAILY S NEVELS, CATHY NOBLE, THOMAS 0 ART SOCIAL STUDIES ENGLISH SECURITY OFFICER PLATO LAB CHEMISTRY ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ASST. PRINCIPAL SPECIAL EDUCATION SOCIAL STUDIES PARAPROFESSIONAL BIOLOGY HALL PRINCIPAL: VERNON SMITH NORDMAN, ANTJE H SPANISH NORMAN, BOBBIE J ENGLISH PICADO, ELENA SPANISH PICKLE, SHIRLEY SPANISH PURDY, LESLIE GAYLE SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY RHODES, BERNESTINE BUSINESS EDUCATION ROBERTSON, ANDREW A SECURITY OFFICER ROBINSON, MARY K HOME ECONOMICS ROBINSON, VICKIE ANN MEDIA CLERK ROMAIN, KARL-HENRY MATHEMATICS ROUBY, DAVID P CHEMISTRY ROWLAND, KAMELA (KAMI) M SPEECH PATHOLOGY RUSH, KELLY SHUMATE MUSIC RUSH, LAWRENCE AMERICAN HISTORY SANDERS, DEMAR CORTEZ SOCIAL STUDIES SANDERS, MARY K SOCIAL STUDIES SHELLS, BYRON S SOCIAL STUDIES SHORT, DEBORAH W SPANISH SIBELL, TRACY LEA GEOMETRY SLAYDEN, MARSHALL L. ENGLISH SMITH JR, VERNON SECONDARY PRINCIPAL SMITH, TAMMY L AIDE STEWART, OLIVIA C SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL STORAY, BILLY EUGENE AIDE TAYLOR, PATRICIA SECRETARY THOMAS, JOHNNY CUSTODIAN THORNS, ARIA ELISE DRAMA VAN METER, KIMBERLY SHEA ENGLISH VAN PELT, SHARON E ENG. SECOND LANG. WADE, ROY L ASST. PRINCIPAL WALKER, ELLA M ASST PRINCIPAL WALTON, GEORGIA C ENGLISH WATSON, GLADYSTINE CAREER/TECH. BUS. ED. WATSON, MARYLEE R. RESOURCE TEACHER WATSON, PATRICIA A GUIDANCE COUNSELOR WILLIAMS, IRA L CUSTODIAN - PART TIME WILLIAMS-JONES, VENNETTA P CUSTODIAN WOOD, PAULA K SPECIAL EDUCATION WOOLEY, ANGELA S ORAL COMMUNICATIONS YOUNG, AMY M SPECIAL EDUCATION ZINK, JUDY R ASST. PRINCIPAL 6700 'H' STREET LITTLE ROCK 72205 PHONE 671-6200 FAX: 671-6207 HENDERSON 401 BARROW RD PHONE 228-3050 PRINCIPAL: LARRY BUCK LITTLE ROCK 72205 FAX: 228-3078 ADAMS.BERNARD IN SCHOOL SUSPENSION MALLETT, ORA D MATHEMATICS I ANDERSON, LINDA W voe. CAREER ORIENT. MAYS,HAZELLERCHETTE ENGLISH BATES, MICKEY L TECHNOLOGY ED SPEC. MCFARLAND, BILLY C SOCIAL STUDIES BITELY, S. WARD BAND DIRECTOR MOORE, JOYCE A. SPECIAL EDUCATION BOLTON, JOYCE M CUSTODIAN MOSBY, LORRAINE L GUIDANCE COUNSELOR BOONE, DEWAYNE SECURITY OFFICER MOTHERSHED, LUCILLE E MATHEMATICS I BROWN, JACKIE R CUSTODIAN - ASST. HEAD MURRAY, JUDITH LOUISE ENGLISH BROWN, MARVIN H CUSTODIAN PATTILLO, CHARLES AIDE - SPECIAL ED. BUCK, LAWRENCE J SECONDARY PRINCIPAL PORCHIA, EDGAR A ART BURTON, KAYE L MEDIA CLERK PRIDE, KIFFANY ROCHELLE ENGLISH CARRUTH.KAREN REGISTRAR ROGERS, SHERRY LYNN ASST. PRINCIPAL COLEMAN, NANCY K GUIDANCE COUNSELOR SCOTT, SUSAN A FRENCH COLFORD, SUSAN SOCIAL STUDIES SHONOWO, OWOPELE 0 PHYSICAL SCIENCE DAUGHERTY, SHERRY E AIDE - INSTRUCTIONAL SHORTER, LARRY D CUSTODIAN DICKINSON, PATRICIA D AMERICAN HISTORY SLATER, CAROLYN A PHYSICAL EDUCATION ELLIS, VICKI E. TYPING/KEYBOARDING SMITH, MELANIE FELICE ENGLISH FARMER JR, JEROME ASST. PRINCIPAL SMITH, SHAROL K SPECIAL EDUCATION FLETCHER, VICKI M PHYSICAL SCIENCE STOWERS, WANDA S ENGLISH FLOYD, LEANNE DEE ENGLISH TATUM, KATHY R HEAL TH SCIENCE SPEC. GRANT, JAMES T MATHEMATICS THOMPSON, CAROLE LIBRARIAN GREEN, MICHAEL B HEALTH TRIMBLE, JOHNNIE L CUSTODIAN - HEAD GRISSOM, YOLANDA YVETTE DATA PROC/COMP TECH. TURNER, ANTOINETTE M HOME ECONOMICS GUEST, JULIA M MATHEMATICS I VALBRACHT,CAROLJ MATHEMATICS I HANNAHS.BARBARA I SOCIAL STUDIES WALKER, CARMEN SCIENCE HAYS, LINDA L ENGLISH WALLACE, ROBERT BUILDING ENGINEER HENDERSON, BETSY D SOCIAL STUDIES WEIR, NANCY L EARTH SCIENCE HILL. DARLENE ATTENDANCE SECRETARY WHITLOW, MARY ANN ENGLISH HOBBS, ANTHONY 0 SPECIAL EDUCATION WILLIAMS, VELMA J MATHEMATICS I HOGUE, PAMELA K MATHEMATICS I WILSON, VEKISSA LANISE ENGLISH HOLCOMB, KIM L EARTH SCIENCE JOHNSON, BENNY D SECURITY OFFICER JOHNSON,CHARLIE BOYS \u0026amp; GIRLS PE JONES, EDDIE CUSTODIAN KELLEY, CARLA J SCHOOL NURSE KELLY, TERETHA E voe. BUSINESS ED. KEOPPLE, KAREN K BOYS \u0026amp; GIRLS PE KING, DEBORAH A BOOKKEEPER KYZER, KRISTI LOUISE LIFE SCIENCE LACKINGS, ARLENE NMN SPECIAL EDUCATION LANCASTER, TAMI L SCIENCE LEWIS, LOUIE SPECIAL EDUCATION LOCK, JOCELYN J SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL LOWE, DEBRA W LIFE SCIENCE MADDOX, BEVERLY K. ENGLISH J. A. FAIR PRINCIPAL: CASSANDRA NORMAN ABLES, FRANCES M ANDERSON, SHERRID ARMSTRONG, JAMES BATEMAN, ROBIN SUSANNE BATES, BETTY S BERJOT, NICOLAS P BURTON, MARVIN L CAGLE, CA THY J CALLAWAY, EVELYN J CAROLINA, DANICA CAULEY,SHARON CLEVELAND, KIMMIE R COLEMAN, MARY L COLLINS, MABEL A COOKUS, JERRY K COOLEY, TAMEKA COX-PHILLIPS, CATHY CROWDER, GLEDA C CUMMINGS, DANYELL C DAVIS, MARIE ESTIS, MARYAM ESTIS, MARYAM E FISHER, JONATHAN FLOYD, D'ANDRE GALLEGOS, DANIEL GLASSCO, BELINDA B GOODNIGHT, SHIRLEY M GRUMMER, WILLIAM J HADLEY, CARRIE HALL, LINDA L HARDER, MELANIE HARDIN, JUDITH K HARRIS, BILLY J HARRISON, T.F KENNETH HART, JUDITH N HART, RONALD ARTHUR HARTNESS, PAUL J HAYGOOD JR, CHARLES E HEAVIN, CAROLS HENSON, JAMES L HOBBY, SELMA P HULLUM, BRENDA S JACKSON, ASHIA DARNELL JACKSON, SHARON K LIBRARIAN - SECONDARY ORAL COMMUNICATIONS SCIENCE ENGLISH REGISTRAR LATIN ASST. PRINCIPAL CHEMISTRY HOME ECONOMICS ATTENDANCE SECRETARY ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL HEALTH SOCIAL STUDIES BUSINESS EDUCATION ENGLISH CUSTODIAN CCE SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL ENGLISH SCHOOL NURSE CBI SPECIAL EDUCATION CUSTODIAN - HEAD CUSTODIAN CUSTODIAN SPECIAL EDUCATION PHYSICAL EDUCATION CAREER EDUCATION SOCIAL STUDIES ENGLISH SCIENCE SECRETARY - GUIDANCE CUSTODIAN MATHEMATICS GUIDANCE COUNSELOR GEOMETRY SPECIAL EDUCATION BUILDING ENGINEER MUSIC SECURITY OFFICER ADMINISTRATIVE ASST. GEOMETRY SOCIAL STUDIES ORAL COMMUNICATIONS 13420 DAVID O DODD LITTLE ROCK 72210 JACOBS, MARY V JAMELL, SAMMIE K JAMES, HOSEA E JOHNSON.CHARLIE JOHNSON, JON M JOHNSON, KRISTIE ANN JONES, DENNIS RAY JONES, DOROTHY B JONES, FREDDIE L KING, CARMELITA D . KLAIS, NANCY MATTES LEDBETTER, JOHN S LEWIS, MARSHA LOWE, VIRGINIA L MACON, SHANDA YVETTE MAGEE, BETTY A MATHIS, JEAN MAYS, ROMONDA MCDONALD, STEVEN T. MCDOUGAL, MARK WAYNE MEHYOU, MYRIAM GUIMARAES MILLER, PATRICIA MOORE, JERRY B MOREY, DONNA I MUELLER, CAROLYN S NAHLEN, MARTHA K NEAL, SHANNON NELSON, KAREN Y NELSON, SUE A NESBITT, DENISE A NICHOLS, KARITA NICHOLS, SHERRY A NICHOLS-ANDERSON, PHILLIS L NORMAN, CASSANDRA R OURY, AMY BROWNING PALMER, ROBERT L PHILLIPS, MAZIE B PICKERING, JUDITH C PRICE, LARA RAINS, MARTHA K REGAN, SHAWN BRANDON ROBERTS, VICKIE R ROSS, JR., THOMAS REDMOND ROWE, CHRISTY MARIE PHONE 228-3100 FAX: 228-3133 voe. BUSINESS ED. SPECIAL EDUCATION SECURITY OFFICER ATHLETICS AMERICAN HISTORY ART GEOMETRY GUIDANCE COUNSELOR SOCIAL STUDIES ENGLISH MATHEMATICS I CUSTODIAN PARAPROFESSIONAL BOOKKEEPER voe. MARKETING COOR. SPANISH CUSTODIAN HOME ECONOMICS SCIENCE ART FRENCH CHILD NUTRITION SECURITY OFFICER IN SCHOOL SUSPENSION SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL voe. BUSINESS ED. BUSINESS GEOMETRY SCIENCE SPEECH THERAPY SCIENCE MEDIA CLERK JOURNALISM SECONDARY PRINCIPAL SPANISH SOCIAL STUDIES GUIDANCE COUNSELOR ENGLISH RESOURCE BIOLOGY ENGLISH PARAPROFESSIONAL ENGLISH PARAPROFESSIONAL J. A. FAIR PRINCIPAL: CASSANDRA NORMAN RUPLE, CHARLES LEE RUTHERFORD, PHILIP R SHERBETT, KATHRYN SMITH, DAVID SMITH, JIMMY L STEELE, MARY M THOMPSON, PEGGY S TROUTMAN, TYKE UMERAH, WALTER WALKER, MARVIN WALLACE, DORA J WAVERLY, GUYTON WILDER, R. LEE WILLIAMS, JACQUELINE MARIE WILLIAMS, MARVELL M WILLIS, LUCY E AMERICAN HISTORY ASST. PRINCIPAL HOME ECONOMICS ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL SECURITY OFFICER SPECIAL EDUCATION ENGLISH JOURNALISM MATHEMATICS I BAND ENGLISH CUSTODIAN ALGEBRA 11 voe. BUSINESS ED. SOCIAL STUDIES ART 13420 DAVID O DODD LITTLE ROCK 72210 PHONE 228-3100 FAX: 228-3133 JEFFERSON PRINCIPAL: ROBERTA MANNON ALLEN, MARY J ANDERSON, OLLIE JEAN BAILEY, GARY E BALL, BARBARA J BROTHERTON,KATHLEEN CHANEY, MELISSA DAWN COMPTON, KRISTIN K COOPER, LEIGH A CRUTCHER,CHERYLL DORMAN, BRENDA M FINKBEINER, TERRI K FORD, LINDA P HAMMOND, TERRI A HAWK, SUNNY L HENDRIX, BEVERLY M. HOFF, SANDRA L HUMPHREY, LOISTINE ITZKOWITZ, CAROLYN J JANSSEN, MARY J JONES, MARY A JONES, VALERIE LANKFORD, MARGARET H LONG, ALBERT LUCKADUE, ESTER YVONNE MANNON, ROBERTA A McATEE, KARIN S MOORE, PATSY A MUENCH, BETTY C NASH, LIL TIUNNA L PALMER, TARLISA PlnENGER, KRISTIANNA D POOL, THERESA RHODES, LUCY L CUSTODIAN ELEMENTARY II CUSTODIAN - PART TIME SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL KINDERGARTEN SPECIAL EDUCATION ELEMENTARY Ill ELEMENTARY I ELEMENTARY Ill KINDERGARTEN SPECIAL EDUCATION GIFTED \u0026amp; TALENTED ELEMENTARY V ELEMENTARY I ELEMENTARY IV LIBRARIAN - ELEMENTARY AIDE - INSTRUCTIONAL ELEMENTARY IV SCHOOL NURSE AIDE - INSTRUCTIONAL AIDE - INSTRUCTIONAL ELEMENTARY II CUSTODIAN - HEAD ELEMENTARY I ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL GIFTED \u0026amp; TALENTED AIDE - SUPERVISION ELEMENTARY II AIDE - SUPERVISION AIDE - INSTRUCTIONAL ELEMENTARY V AIDE - INSTRUCTIONAL GUIDANCE COUNSELOR RICHARDSON, SHOUTELL DENISE KINDERGARTEN Ross, ANNIE H ELEMENTARY IV ROSSI, JANET K SMITH, ELIZABETH ANN SMITH, JULIA DIANE STRICKLAND, MARGARET J TENNAL, PRISCILLA N THOMPSON, JEANIE M THORNTON, JODI K WILLIAMS, JOANN S SPEECH THERAPY MUSIC FOUR YR OLD TEACHER SPEECH THERAPY LAB ATTENDANT AIDE - SUPERVISION ELEMENTARY 111 ELEMENTARY V 2600 N MCKINLEY LITTLE ROCK 72207 PHONE 671-6281 FAX: 671-6289 ML KING PRINCIPAL: TYRONE HARRIS ADAMS, PAMELA KATE ALLISON, LAURI S BETTON, IRA L BOHANNON, NITA RACHELLE BOLTON, MATTIE BRANNICK, SHARON P BROOKS, JILL YVETTE BURGESS, SHAWN D CALDWELL, CHARLOTTE CALDWELL, JIMMIE L CAMP, BRIGGETTE L CAPPS, DEBBIE E CHARLES, KATHLEEN M CHEREPSKI, STEVANNA D COOLEY, TAMARA S. COPELAND, JACQUELYN ELEMENTARY (DEV) ELEMENTARY Ill READING TEACHER ELEMENTARY II CUSTODIAN ELEMENTARY Ill ELEMENTARY II ELEMENT ARY IV CUSTODIAN - PART TIME CUSTODIAN - ASST. HEAD MEDIA CLERK ELEMENTARY V FOUR YR OLD TEACHER SCHOOL NURSE AIDE GIFTED \u0026amp; TALENTED COURTNEY-NICHOLS, TONYA LYN KINDERGARTEN CRUDUP, VERDA M DARR, MELISSA RATHER EPPS, NETTIE E FELTON, WILLIAM R FINKBEINER, DEBORAH J FLEMING, TAMLA JO FLETCHER, LINDA M GLASCO, GWENDOLYN J GOODMAN, TAMORA L GREGORY, PATRICIA A GUERRA, TERRY HARRIS, BRENDA GAIL HARRIS, HENRY TYRONE HINES, BEYERL Y J HOOD, SUSIE M JAMES, RITA A JOHNSON, GERALDINE A JONES, CAROLYN D JONES, DEBORAH M JOSHUA, SHELDON KAHLER, MARY L KAY, JERRI LYNN KENTNER, LINDA L KORDSMEIER, LINDA C LAWSON, DEBORAH K LEE, ANNETTE M LEWIS, OCIE L AIDE KINDERGARTEN SCIENCE SPECIALIST ELEMENTARY 11 LANGUAGE ARTS SPEC. ELEMENTARY I ELEMENTARY 11 KINDERGARTEN ELEMENTARY V GUIDANCE COUNSELOR ELEMENTARY 111 ELEMENTARY II ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL FOUR YR OLD TEACHER LAB ATTENDANT MATHEMATICS SPEC. GUIDANCE COUNSELOR AIDE AIDE - SUPERVISION MUSIC ASST. PRINCIPAL SPEECH THERAPY AIDE AIDE LIBRARIAN - ELEMENTARY KINDERGARTEN AIDE ATTENDANCE SECRETARY 905 MARTIN L. KING, JR. DR LITTLE ROCK 72202 LLOYD, HOLLY E. LLOYD, JULIA F LOSAK, PATRICIA L MACK,CHERYLL MARTIN, SHEILA R MATLOCK, ZACHARY MCCLINA, MARY MCCONNELL, DONALD R MCCULLOUGH, JOYCE M MCDONALD, MICHAEL G MCDONNELL, JENA S MITCHELL, BRENT S MITCHELL, SANDRA A MOORE, GINA L MORRISON, ANGELA L. ODLE, NANCY K PENCE, JEAN A PURTLE, SARAH L REED, URSULA ROCHELLE, AMOS T RUTHERFORD, MARJORIE L SALLIE, ANGELA SANDERS, CAROL E SIMS, SHERRY LYNN SPRADLIN, REBECCA L THOMAS, RICHELLE L VAN PATTER, CANDI A WASHINGTON, MINNIE B WATERS, DORIS Z WILLIAMS, PATRICIA B WILLIS, TIJUANA Y ZIES, MARYE PHONE 324-2135 FAX: 324-2150 AIDE FOUR YR OLD TEACHER AIDE AIDE ELEMENTARY 111 AIDE AIDE CUSTODIAN - HEAD ELEMENT ARY I CUSTODIAN AIDE ELEMENTARY V SPEECH THERAPY AIDE ELEMENTARY I AIDE KINDERGARTEN FOUR YR OLD TEACHER AIDE - SUPERVISION ELEMENTARY PE ELEMENTARY 111 AIDE ELEMENTARY I LIBRARIAN - ELEMENTARY ELEMENTARY IV ELEMENTARY I ELEMENTARY IV AIDE SPECIAL EDUCATION AIDE AIDE MUSIC MABELVALE ELEM PRINCIPAL: TABITHA PHILLIPS BELL, CLOIS L BELL, SUSAN E BUREL, BEVERLY D CALDWELL, LINDA L CARGILL, KATHLEEN S CLARK, DONNA J CORLEY, T CAROL COUCH, MARTHA K DEES, CINDY L DURHAM, CATHERINE GILBERT, BEVERLY L GRANT, BRIAN L GREENLEE, LILLIE JO HANSEN, CONSTANCE HART, ANDREW HASTINGS, MARTHA E HUDGENS, DONNA F IGWE, CARRIE MOORE JACUZZI, MARILYN J JOHNSON, BONITA ANN JONES, ROVENA JUNIEL, KATHON MCCOMB, ASHLEY MOORE, JANICE L PARKER, EARLENE PHILLIPS, TABITHA L PINKERTON, SHANNON R PORTERFIELD, DEBORAH K PRICE, CINDY C RANEY, LINDA L ROSEBERRY, LINDA L RUCKER, REBECCA D scan, IOMA y SIMS, MARVA J SMITH, CASSANDRA SMITH, LAURA ANN VAN ENK, LEE A WALKER, ARDELIA A WEST, ANGELA J WESTON, OPHELIA WITT, KAREN S WYMES, ERSENIA MUSIC MEDIA CLERK AIDE - SUPERVISION ELEMENTARY IV ELEMENTARY Ill LIBRARIAN - ELEMENTARY FOUR YR OLD TEACHER ELEMENTARY IV READING TEACHER KINDERGARTEN AIDE - SPECIAL ED. CUSTODIAN SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL ELEMENTARY IV CUSTODIAN - PART TIME AIDE - SUPERVISION KINDERGARTEN SPECIAL EDUCATION ELEMENTARY I GIFTED \u0026amp; TALENTED AIDE - SUPERVISION ELEMENTARY II KINDERGARTEN ELEMENTARY II CUSTODIAN ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL ELEMENTARY I SCHOOL NURSE SPECIAL EDUCATION ELEMENTARY Ill CUSTODIAN - HEAD ELEMENTARY V AIDE SPECIAL EDUCATION AIDE SPEECH THERAPY GUIDANCE COUNSELOR ELEMENTARY Ill ELEMENTARY V ATTENDANCE SECRETARY ELEMENTARY II AIDE 9401 M'VALE CUT-OFF MABELVALE 72103 PHONE 455-7420 FAX: 455-7410 MABELVALE MIDDLE PRINCIPAL: ANN BLAYLOCK BAILEY, JOHNNY BANKS, RHONDA L BANKSTON, BRENDA CREDIT BAUER, EVELYN L BEARD-HUNTING, HOLLACE R BETTON, SHERRI L BLAYLOCK, MARCELLA A BOOTH, VIRGINIA C BRAGG, ABBIE R CAMERON, STELLA F CAMPBELL, HEIDI C. CHILDS, SANDRA D CLEVELAND, ELLEAN D COFFMAN, DONNIE R DORRIS, SHANNON HERNANDEZ ELLINGTON JR, JEFFERY ELLIS, LORENE EMMEL, SHARON KAY FARLEY, KATHEY D FERGUSSON, SHARONLYNN FISK, TIMM. GREEN, CONNIE G GRIMMETT, JEFFREY WILLIAM GULLETT, RANDY E HARDING, HOLLY HARGRO, DOUGLAS W HARVEY, ELIZABETH A HOOD, ETHEL ELAINE HOPSON, TIMOTHY J JACKSON, BENNIE JOHNSON, JOHN C JONES, CECELIA SMITH JONES, MARY R JORDAN, DEMETRIA A JORDAN. MARCUS LAWRENCE, DARRELL D LEWIS, PATSY N MASON, TRACY LYNN MILLIGAN, JENNIFER H MOORE, MELINDA LEA MOSELEY, FRAN N OWENS, KIRK PENNINGTON, PATRICIA A PEOPLES, LINDA C. SECURITY OFFICER REGISTRAR ENGLISH AIDE - SPECIAL ED. ENGLISH GUIDANCE COUNSELOR SECONDARY PRINCIPAL SOCIAL STUDIES CUSTODIAN LIBRARIAN SCIENCE MATHEMATICS I ASST. PRINCIPAL BOYS \u0026amp; GIRLS PE MATHEMATICS I ALGEBRA I SPECIAL EDUCATION ENGLISH SCIENCE MATHEMATICS I SPEECH PATHOLOGY LIFE SCIENCE AIDE - SPECIAL ED. IND. TECH. ED. ENGLISH CUSTODIAN - HEAD AIDE - SPECIAL ED. ENGLISH TYPING/KEYBOARDING ENGLISH IN SCHOOL SUSPENSION ENGLISH READING SPECIAL EDUCATION SECURITY OFFICER BAND DIRECTOR SPECIAL EDUCATION LIFE SCIENCE EARTH SCIENCE ATTENDANCE SECRETARY WORLD CULT/HISTORY CUSTODIAN - ASST. HEAD GUIDANCE COUNSELOR SPECIAL EDUCATION 10811 MABELVALE WEST PHONE 455-7400 MABELVALE 72103 FAX: 455-7403 RHODES, MICHELLE R MATHEMATICS I ROBINSON, GEORGE W CUSTODIAN - PART TIME SELVIDGE, CONNIE LEE SPANISH SIMON, THERESA L FRENCH SMITH, DAVID W. CIVICS WALLACE, CESALIE D SCHOOL NURSE WALLACE, PAMELA G WORLD CULT/HISTORY WALTERS, JEFFREYS PHYSICAL EDUCATION WARD, ROBERT D AMERICAN HISTORY WATSON, YOLANDA MECHELL ENGLISH WEBB, THOMAS C MATHEMATICS I WUNEBURGER, NANCY B SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL MANN PRINCIPAL: JIM FULLERTON ADAMS, TARA ALICE ANDERSON,RUGENAL ATKINSON, ARISTAL BAILEY, S. ROBBIN BAKER.FRANK BELL, LINDA J BENAGE, DUANE L. BERMAN, LINDA L BIVENS, CAROL BOHRA, REBECCA L BOLDEN, YVONNE R BOYKIN, PATRICIA F BRIGGS, RONALD K BROWN, KELLIE M BUMPERS, BONNIE C BYRD, DEBORAH H CARR, JACQUELINE CASTLEBERRY, CAMILLE COMINS. RUTH DANIEL, ROSALIE G DENNIS, BEVERLY A DESJARDIN, DEBORAH DODSON, TOMMY L DORHAN, NORMA DOZIER, KARLA SHENICE DUERR, DONNA p FLEMING, LINDA K FLETCHER, DANNY J FREEMAN, JANICE R FULLERTON, JAMES C FUTRELL, CHARITA L GILBERT-WISE, M BARBARA Goss, CATHY p HARRIS, PAULA R HAYES, STELLA L HEARD,CHERYLJ HOLCOMB, IRENE HOLT, DEEANN JACKSON, ANDY B JOHNSON JR, IVRIA JOHNSON, LORRAINE 0 KIDD, CLEORTIUS LAWSON, ELLENS LEVIN. BARBARA D GUIDANCE COUNSELOR ENGLISH CUSTODIAN ASST. HEAD SOCIAL STUDIES ALGEBRA I ENGLISH GERMAN TEACHER LANGUAGE ARTS MEDIA CLERK SCIENCE LIFE SCIENCE ASST. PRINCIPAL BOYS \u0026amp; GIRLS PE SCIENCE LIFE SCIENCE ENGLISH ENGLISH SCIENCE TEACHER SPANISH TEACHER LIBRARIAN ARKANSAS HISTORY PRE-ALGEBRA voe. CAREER ORIENT. CUSTODIAN SCIENCE ASST. PRINCIPAL SCIENCE BAND DIRECTOR MATHEMATICS I SECONDARY PRINCIPAL SPECIAL EDUCATION READING MATHEMATICS I MATHEMATICS I ENGLISH ENGLISH SOCIAL STUDIES AMERICAN HISTORY CUSTODIAN HEAD LIFE SCIENCE ENGLISH IND. TECH. ED. GUIDANCE COUNSELOR MATHEMATICS I 1000 E ROOSEVELT RD LITTLE ROCK 72206 MARTIN, TANIESA DE'SHURN MATTHIS, JAMES L MCKENNEY, JAMIE MARIE MCSWAIN, JOYCE M MILLER-BOOKHOUT, ROBIN C MIMS, RICHARD L MOORE JR, CHARLES A MOORE, BETTY R. NEWCOMB, DARYL D NICHOLS, SUSAN D NORTON, GARY D PARCHMAN, SOPHIA Y PEARSON, MARVA D PRESLEY, TRACI A QUALLS, LYNDA A RANDLE, BOBBY L REMLEY, 0 C ROBINSON, STEPHEN T. ROSS, BETTY N SAGE, REBECCA A SHINN, BRIDGET ANN SMITH, DAVID M SMITH, HARRY J SMITH, LINDA SMITH, OLYMPIA S. SMITH, TANYA L TACKETT, ANTONIA T THURSTON, MICHELLE C TOLLETTE, JOAN TRICE, NANCY L TRIMBLE, BETTY J WALKER-WHEELER, LISA T WALLACE, RODNEY J WASHINGTON, RUBY J ZIMMER, ROBIN W PHONE 324-2450 FAX: 324-2496 SOCIAL STUDIES ASST. PRINCIPAL PHYSICAL SCIENCE MATHEMATICS I ART SCIENCE MATHEMATICS ATTENDANCE SECRETARY SCIENCE DRAMA SPECIALIST AMERICAN HISTORY DATA PROC/COMP TECH. SOCIAL STUDIES ALT LEARNING TEACHER SECRETARY PRINCIPAL CUSTODIAN SOCIAL STUDIES SECURITY OFFICER BOOKKEEPER/SEC. SCHOOL NURSE ENGLISH ASST. PRINCIPAL SECURITY OFFICER SCIENCE ALT LEARNING TEACHER FRENCH REGISTRAR ART BOYS \u0026amp; GIRLS PE ENGLISH MATHEMATICS I MUSIC PIANO GUIDANCE COUNSELOR SOCIAL STUDIES MCCLELLAN PRINCIPAL: JODIE CARTER ALLMON, TERRY L MATHEMATICS II ARMSTRONG, HERBERT CUSTODIAN BAILEY, MICHAEL HOWARD BIOLOGY BARRETT, JOHNNIE L IN SCHOOL SUSPENSION BASKINS, WANDA F CAREER EDUCATION BILAL-RAFTER, PAULA H BIOLOGY BILBREY, PATRICIA A MATHEMATICS I BLAKNEY, GLORIA S GUIDANCE COUNSELOR BOGAN, ROSE A HOME ECONOMICS BOOTH-TERRY, KAREN SCHOOL NURSE BROWN, JUDITH M MEDIA CLERK BROWN, MICHELE voe. BUSINESS ED. CANTRELL, CHARLES R WORLD HISTORY CARTER, JODIE T SECONDARY PRINCIPAL CHAMBERS, ANTHONY D IND. TECH. ED. COLEMAN, MARSHIA A CIV./WORLD HIST./PSYCH. CONINE, JAN E ENGLISH CUNNINGHAM, VELMA CUSTODIAN - PART TIME DICKSON, REBECCA ANN SPECIAL EDUCATION DUVALL, DALLIE M. SPECIAL EDUCATION EGWIM, SYLVESTER N MATHEMATICS I ESSARY, PAMELA G BOOKKEEPER EVANS, TERRIE RENEE SPECIAL EDUCATION FERGUSON, SHIRLEY L ENGLISH FLOWERS, SUSAN S GUIDANCE COUNSELOR FRANKS, ERMA J AMERICAN HISTORY GABLE, GLORIA J SPECIAL EDUCATION GEURIN, STEPHEN C CURRICULUM SPECIALIST GIBEAULT, SUZANNE NMN ART GLASS, LINDA PHYSICS GODLEY, GLADYS K voe. BUSINESS ED. GRAY, BARBARA D ENGLISH GRAY-AKINS, ELIZABETH L ATTENDANCE SECRETARY GUERRERO, ANA MARIA SPANISH GUNN, ALEACHIA D SECRETARY PRINCIPAL GUNN, DAVID L BIOLOGY HALEY, ELISABETH ANTOINETTE FRENCH HALL, HARRIETT LOUISE SECRETARY GUIDANCE HARRIS, LORETTA J ENGLISH HARTWICK, NORMA R ATTENDANCE SECRETARY HEARN, TONI LYN ENGLISH HENSON, ANITA M GEOMETRY/ALGEBRA II HESTER, SHARON SECURITY OFFICER HODGES, SHIRLEY B voe. BUSINESS ED. 6417 GEYER SPRINGS LITTLE ROCK 72209 PHONE 570-4100 FAX: 570-4098 HOFFMAN, DOUGLAS B MUSIC SPECIALIST HOLEMAN, ELEANOR L IND. COOPERATIVE TRAINI HYNES, MICHAEL P MATHEMATICS II ISOM, CHRISTAL L GUIDANCE COUNSELOR JEFFERSON, ANDRE' L CUSTODIAN JONES, DOROTHY J MATHEMATICS I JONES, GRANVILLE CUSTODIAN ASST. HEAD KEITH, WANDA L GUIDANCE COUNSELOR KING, JERI B voe. BUSINESS ED. LEFFINGWELL, DONALD C. SCIENCE LESLIE, NANCY G DISTRIBUTIVE ED. COOR. MARTIN, PEARLIE M CUSTODIAN MARTS, LEIGH TAYLOR LAB ATTENDANT MCCOY,OLEN ART MCGINNESS, ALANA ANN BUSINESS EDUCATION MCKINNEY, THOMAS W BOYS PE MEADE, BRENDA FAYE SPECIAL EDUCATION MILLER, WILLIAM J. SECURITY OFFICER MOSLEY, BLENDA J ECONOMICS MOSLEY, GREG CUSTODIAN PART TIME NALLEY, MARGARET R LIBRARIAN SECONDARY NEELY, BARBARA A voe. BUSINESS ED. NEELY, BARRY S SECURITY OFFICER NELSON, TRACEY A REGISTRAR NOWDEN, EMMA BARNES ORAL COMMUNICATIONS O'NEAL, ELSA KATE ART ONEIL, SHARON KAY ORAL COMMUNICATIONS OWEN, APRIL H CHEMISTRY PIGGEE, JOYCE CUSTODIAN HEAD RADKE, ERIN D JOURNALISM RANDOLPH, GWENDA MICHELLE SECURITY OFFICER RICHARD, WALTER BUILDING ENGINEER RIKE, APRIL VICTORIA voe. BUSINESS ED. ROBINSON, CHERRY ANN ENGLISH SEATON, TIMOTHY L. SECURITY OFFICER SETTLE, NANCY A ART SHELTON, MARK ERNEST SOCIAL STUDIES SHOFNER, KAREN KAY ENGLISH SMITH, DOROTHY ORAL COMMUNICATIONS SMITH, LEA ANNE voe. BUSINESS ED. SMITH, PHYLLIS A voe. BUSINESS ED. SMITHSON, LAURA D ENGLISH STANDLEY, JOHN LAWRENCE SOCIAL STUDIES STILES, WILLIAM R BAND DIRECTOR MCCLELLAN PRINCIPAL: JODIE CARTER STUCKEY, BRENDA J THREATT, CHRISTOPHER ERROL TIMMONS, CALVIN WALKER, CHERRIE D WALKER, GWENDOLYN WALKER, MILDRED J WEST, VANGELE OTIS WHERRY, YOLANDA WILBON, RENITA WILLIAMS, ADEAL WILLIAMS, JOYCE Y WILSON, WAYNE A WRIGHT, CYNTHIA L WYLES, SHIRLA S YOUNG, VALARIE R. ZINCK, TAMARA ZINCK, TAMARA L voe. BUSINESS ED. ENGLISH CUSTODIAN ASST. PRINCIPAL HEALTH CALCULUS HEALTH AIDE - INSTRUCTIONAL SPECIAL EDUCATION PLATO LAB ENGLISH CUSTODIAN SOCIAL STUDIES CUSTODIAN AIDE COMMUNICATIONS ORAL COMMUNICATIONS 6417 GEYER SPRINGS LITTLE ROCK 72209 PHONE 570-4100 FAX: 570-4098 \\ MCDERMOTT PRINCIPAL: VIRGINIA ASHLEY ALEXANDER, CAROLYN A ALEXANDER, MADIE A ALLEN, SHIRLEY A ANDERSON, AMY G. ASHLEY, VIRGINIA B BOTNER, JANICE E BURKS, SHEALINE L COOPER, LABETHA J CROSBY, ANNE M DOAN, PAULA M DOERPINGHAUS, SHERRI L. DOWNIE, KATHERINE M DOWNING, NANCY N EXSON, EDDIE FIELDS, ALICE FORD, GINGER GARNER, SHEILA D GILL, JUDY C. GOSS, CYNTHIA J. GREENWALD, MELANIE M HEGWOOD, KIMBERLY HOLMES, DELISA Y. JAMES, EMOGENE B KEMP, WANDA L KIMBROUGH, QUINCEY L KITCHEN, DON E MCCARTHER, GERALDINE MILLER, JOYCE MOUNGER, ANITA J MURPHY, LYNETTE C, NOWLIN, WHITNEY L O'NEAL-WILKINS, ERICKA N PACK, JANET E PAIGE, CYNTHIA PARKER, SHIRLEY A PARKER, TAMMY L PULLEN, JODI QAASHI, MUNEERAH H. SANDERS, GALE E SIMONS, REBECCA ANN SWATY, NANCY A TEETER, CHARLOTTE A THOMPSON, SANDRA L WALDEN, KRISTIN J ATTENDANCE SECRETARY AIDE MUSIC PSYCH. EXAMINER ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL ELEMENTARY V GUIDANCE COUNSELOR ELEMENT ARY IV SPEECH THERAPY ELEMENTARY I HEALTH NURSE SPECIAL EDUCATION ELEMENTARY 11 CUSTODIAN CHILD NUTRITION GIFTED \u0026amp; TALENTED ELEMENTARY 111 MEDIA SECRETARY FOUR YR OLD TEACHER KINDERGARTEN CUSTODIAN AIDE - SUPERVISION ELEMENTARY II ASST. PRINCIPAL AIDE CUSTODIAN - HEAD ELEMENTARY V CHILD NUTRITION ELEMENTARY Ill PHYSICAL THERAPIST ELEMENTARY IV KINDERGARTEN GIFTED \u0026amp; TALENTED P.E. INSTRUCTIONAL AIDE AIDE - SUPERVISION ELEMENTARY Ill OCCUPATIONAL THEA. RESOURCE KINDERGARTEN SECRETARY- PRINCIPAL LIBRARIAN ELEMENTARY READING TEACHER ELEMENTARY I ELEMENTARY IV 1200 RESERVOIR RD LITTLE ROCK 72207 WASHINGTON, MARY A WHITE, TONI MARIE WILLIAMS, KENNETH L WILLIS, DARLENE PHONE 228-3072 FAX: 228-3104 ELEMENTARY II LAB ATTENDANT AIDE - SUPERVISION ELEMENTARY I MEADOWCLIFF PRINCIPAL: JERRY WORM ARNOLD, THEESSA J BISHOP, LOIS A BURCH, STACY A. BURGESS,KAREN BUTTS, MARY S CRAIG, DEBORAH L GILBERT, JEAN GOODWIN, KATHERINE A GUNDERMAN, JANICE G HAYDEN, LEE M HENCE, VERDIA M HUGHES, HELEN D HUNTER, MARSHA KULBETH, LORI L. MACK, ROGER E MASON, JOYCE p MOORE, CONSTANCE L MORGAN, DEE ANN MUNCIE, PAMELA M. NELSON, REBECCA M PICKENS, DENISE SEBOURN, KAREN L THOMAS, KATHRYN D TROTTER, DANIELL WEBB, JESSIE L WEBSTER, PHYLLIS WETZEL, MARY D WILLIAMS, JO ANN WILLIAMS, KEENA WORM, JERRY P FOUR YR OLD TEACHER ELEMENTARY II SPEECH THERAPY ELEMENTARY II KINDERGARTEN ELEMENTARY IV RESOURCE MUSIC GUIDANCE COUNSELOR ELEMENTARY Ill ELEMENTARY IV AIDE SUPERVISION GIFTED \u0026amp; TALENTED SPEC ELEMENTARY V CUSTODIAN ELEMENTARY I CHILD NUTRITION MGR. KINDERGARTEN ELEMENTARY V LIBRARIAN ELEMENTARY SUPERVISION AIDE READING TEACHER ELEMENTARY I CUSTODIAN HEAD SECRETARY PRINCIPAL CUSTODIAN PART TIME ELEMENTARY Ill AIDE LAB ATTENDANT ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL 25 SHERATON DR LITTLE ROCK 72209 PHONE 570-4165 FAX: 570-4037 METROPOLITAN PRINCIPAL: MICHAEL PETERSON AMES, CHRISTOPHER R AVERITT, WILLIAM STEVEN BERRY, DARRELL W BRYELS, STERLING LED BURCHETT, SCOTTIE L CARTER, NONA COLLIE, STEVEN B DOWNS, QUEEN ESTER EACKLES, VICTOR EVANS, RICKY L FARMER, WANDA F FELLS, CORINTHIS FORTSON, GWYN D GRUMMER JR, CARL F GUNNELLS. REBECCA HAYMAN, REGINALD DWAIN HOLT, MARGARETE JACKSON JR, MIL TON KIRKPATRICK, TERRY G LAND-LANDERS, VICKIE A LESTER, GEORGIA MCKINNEY, ANTHONY LYNN MILES, BRUCE A MOORE, ROBERT N PARKER, SONYA L PERRY, MITCHELL PETERSON, MICHAEL W POWELL, WOODROW LEE PRATHER, LAURIE RENEE ROLAND, RONALD L SKIPPER, J C SODERLING, LINDA J SPRINGER, CHARLES S WILCOX, JEFFERY LYNN voe. CAREER ORIENT. DIESEL MECHANICS COMMERCIAL ART SECURITY OFFICER COSMETOLOGY CUSTODIAN GRAPHIC COMM. SECURITY OFFICER AUTOMOTIVE GRAPHIC COMM. CUSTODIAN SECURITY OFFICER METAL FABRICATION DRAFTING CUSTODIAN RADIO SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL BUILDING ENGINEER GRAPHIC COMM. ATTENDANCE SECRETARY SECURITY OFFICER CUSTODIAN TELEVISION CUSTODIAN SCHOOL NURSE GRAPHIC COMM. SECONDARY PRINCIPAL FOOD PROD. MGMT JSERV. HEALTH OCCUPATIONS ELECTRONICS AUTO PT/BODY COSMETOLOGY CURA. STU. SERV. COOR. BUILDING TRADES 7701 SCOTT HAMIL TON LITTLE ROCK 72209 PHONE 565-846 FAX: 565-023 MITCHELL PRINCIPAL: DARIAN SMITH ANTHONY, GLADYS ELEMENTARY IV BRADBERRY, ALICE ANN AUXILIARY TEACHER BRIGHT, KENRICK AIDE BROOKS, PATRICIA GUIDANCE COUNSELOR BURKS, VICKI BOLDING FOUR YR OLD TEACHER CALDWELL, JOSEPHINE B AIDE CLEMMONS, JANICE AIDE - SUPERVISION CLEVELAND, JOYCE D ELEMENTARY IV COLEMAN, THELMA LIBRARIAN - ELEMENTARY CROY, LEE A SECURITY OFFICER EAST, THOMAS E AIDE FLOWERS, ELLIS L CUSTODIAN - HEAD HARSHAW, ROSELYN ELEMENTARY II HENDERSON, BARBARA J AIDE IBEKWE, THERESA N ELEMENTARY V IRBY, NETTIE A AIDE IVERSON, DELORIS H WRITING TO READ LAB JACKSON, BARBARA J AIDE JOHNSON, DEBRAJ. SCHOOL NURSE JOHNSON, NIKOL AIDE JOHNSON, SANDRA A SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL JONES, JOSEPH CUSTODIAN KECK, CHRISTOPHER KELLY MUSIC MARSHALL, GWENDOLYN HALL ELEMENTARY Ill MAYWEATHER, YEVETTE M AIDE - INSTRUCTIONAL MILLER, HENRIETTA ELEMENTARY I MITCHELL, CHERYL Y SPECIAL EDUCATION NELSON, JAMES F ELEMENTARY II POE, JERRY L CUSTODIAN - PART TIME RANEY, JODI A KINDERGARTEN REGNIER, MARGARET A SPECIAL EDUCATION RODNEY, ANGELIA R. COMPUTER LAB ATTEND. SHELBY, SABRA M CURRICULUM SHORTER, THELMA p KINDERGARTEN SMITH, DARIAN LYNN ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL SMITH, DORIS J AIDE SMITH, KATHY G ELEMENTARY I TAYLOR, BETHANY E AIDE THOMAS, DEBORAH J ELEMENTARY Ill WARREN, ANDRE L ELEMENTARY V WESSON, LINDA K AIDE - SPECIAL ED. WIGHT, LINDA M AIDE - SPECIAL ED. 2410 BATTERY LITTLE ROCK 72206 PHONE 324-2415 FAX: 324-2419 OTTERCREEK PRINCIPAL: JANIS TUCKER BARNEY, VICTORIA G BEARDEN, MELISSA J BROYLES, DORIS A BRYANT, CAROLINE J CLARK, ETTATRICIA FLOYZINE COLE, THEODOSIA J COSTA, GWEN L COURTOIS, SANDRA K. COX, CYNTHIA G CURTIS, CINDY ANN FLORES, DEBRA R HALL, VENITA L HARRISON, AMAL D HAWKINS, DAWNA CHERYL HAYES, LAURINE D HOLMES, LAMONT HOWARD, DIANNE M KEITH, TRULA C. KESSINGER, REBECCA P KINNEMAN, BEVERLY B MITCHELL, VICKYE Y MOORE, HATTIE L MULKEY, MARYS O'KEEFE, LUCILLE 0 PRINGLE, MARIE F REESE, PATSY J ROSE, JOANN V ROWLAND, PATRICIA A THOMAS, BARBARA J TUCKER, JANIS A VAUGHN, KELLYE SCHOOL NURSE ELEMENTARY IV ELEMENTARY I ELEMENTARY Ill KINDERGARTEN ELEMENTARY I SPECIAL EDUCATION FOUR YR OLD TEACHER ELEMENTARY V AIDE LIBRARIAN ELEMENTARY KINDERGARTEN SPEECH PATHOLOGY AIDE ELEMENTARY 11 CUSTODIAN HEAD GUIDANCE COUNSELOR AIDE SPECIAL ED. READING SPECIALIST GIFTED \u0026amp; TALENTED ELEMENTARY I LAB ATTENDANT MUSIC ELEMENTARY IV ELEMENTARY V ELEMENTARY 111 ELEMENTARY II SECRETARY PRINCIPAL MEDIA CLERK ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL KINDERGARTEN WHITTINGTON, SHERKEYER RENA ELEMENTARY V WILLIAMSON, MYCHELLE KLEYPA ELEMENTARY I 16000 OTTER CREEK PKY LITTLE ROCK 72209 PHONE 455-7440 FAX: 455-7498 PARKVIEW PRINCIPAL: DR. LINDA BROWN ACKLEN, RUTHIE L ALEXANDER, ALICE C BIGGS, LAGAIL RELEFORD BIRGE, ANN A BLACK, DANNY H BOONE, MARIE A BOOSEY II, FRED S BOOTH, DEXTER L BOUREIKO, NATALYA BOURLAND, MAURI S BRADSHER, PATRICIA J BROWN, LINDA G BROWN, OTIS BROWN, ROBERT EUGENE BROWN, SHIRLEY A BURTON, ANGELAJACOBS CALDWELL. CONNIE CAMPBELL, VELRITA L CARPENTER, CAROLYN CARTER, SANDRA Y CLARK, ROBERT L CODY-TAYLOR, SUSAN E COLE, JUDY K COLE. LEIGH CRANE. CHRISTOPHER CRANE. PAMELA RENEA CROSS, KATHRYN L DANIEL, MARTHA G ELLIS, EDITH p FARLOW, AMELIA S FLANIGAN, ALFRED W FOREMAN. CAROLYN A FULBRIGHT, DEBORAH R FULLER. DANNY A GOSS. JUDY B GOYNES JR, LEE S GRAY, CARRIE AMANDA HANSEN. ANNE HARDIMAN, WILLIAM L HENDRICKS, RUTH A HENDRICKSON, TINA L HENRY, SARAH C HERON, BEV ERL y A HERRINGTON, LESLIE LYNN BIOLOGY SECRETARY PRINCIPAL ORAL COMMUNICATIONS MATHEMATICS I SOCIAL STUDIES ALGEBRA II ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ASST PRINCIPAL LATIN PUPIL PERSONNEL DATA PROC/COMP TECH. SECONDARY PRINCIPAL CUSTODIAN BAND DIRECTOR CUSTODIAN CHEMISTRY MATHEMATICS SECURITY OFFICER SOCIAL STUDIES REGISTRAR ART ENGLISH BOOKKEEPER ALGEBRA II ORAL COMMUNICATIONS DANCE FRENCH AMERICAN GOVT/CIVICS ORCHESTRA FINE ARTS (MUSIC) BOYS \u0026amp; GIRLS PE FINE ARTS (MUSIC) SPECIAL EDUCATION CHEMISTRY ORAL COMMUNICATIONS CUSTODIAN - HEAD GERMAN ASST PRINCIPAL AMERICAN HISTORY SCIENCE CHEMISTRY ENGLISH SCHOOL NURSE ENGLISH 2501 BARROW RD LITTLE ROCK 72204 HIETT, RUTHIE R HOBBS, PAMELA A HOKES, HENRY HOWARD, LAHOMA L. HOWELL, DEBBIE D HUNTER-MILLER, MARY E IVERSON, TONJUNA L JACKSON, CHRISTY LEIGH JAMES, MARY A JENNINGS, CAROL A JENNINGS, CINDY L JOHNSON, ARTHUR L JOHNSON,NANCY JONES, ALVENA MARIE JONES, CHERYL T JONES, TRAYCE R. KAMARA, LINDA A KING, BARBARA G KNIGHT, KATHERINE W KREADY, SARAH F LACEY JR, JESSE J LAMEY, JAMES MICHAEL LANDERS, LAURA P LANGSTON,DOROTHEA LEM, LOUIE H LEWIS, EMILY MATSON LUSK, JENNIFER L LYLE, LEE A MAPLE, CATHERINE P MATHIS, BARBARA S MCCLUNG, TERRELL B MCDANIEL, BARBARA G MCGEE, EARNEST E MOGSTAD, BONNIE L MOSES, TERI LYNNETTE MURRAY, DEBRA ANN NEWTH, WILLIAM R OSHIRO, NIDIA PACE-HAMPTON, VANNESSA E PICARD, RICHARD L PICKERING, JASON R. PIGGEE, CELESTINE PRIDE, EDDIE RAMSEY, KATHLEEN E PHONE 228-3000 FAX: 228-3061 SOCIAL STUDIES JOURNALISM CUSTODIAN PHYSICAL EDUCATION ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ATTENDANCE SECRETARY MATHEMATICS MATHEMATICS I GUIDANCE COUNSELOR voe. BUSINESS ED. SCIENCE NAVY ROTC SECRETARY - GUIDANCE BUSINESS EDUCATION GUIDANCE COUNSELOR SECRETARY WORLD CULT/HISTORY ART ENGLISH ENGLISH ACTIVITY COORDINATOR ORAL COMMUNICATIONS GUIDANCE COUNSELOR CUSTODIAN NAVY ROTC ENGLISH GERMAN SPANISH CIVICS HEALTH HEALTH ENGLISH BIOLOGY ART BIOLOGY ART SECURITY OFFICER SPANISH GEOMETRY PHYSICS AMERICAN HISTORY ASST. PRINCIPAL CUSTODIAN BIOLOGY PARKVIEW PRINCIPAL: DR. LINDA BROWN RICHARDSON, DONALD MATHEMATICS I RIOS, DONNA K ATTENDANCE SECRETARY ROBERTS, CORNELIUS C CIVICS SIMS, TERESA L SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL SMITH, SUSANA G SPANISH STEADMAN, BART D BUILDING ENGINEER TAPPIN, LINCOLN R CUSTODIAN - ASST. HEAD TATE, HELEN M ALGEBRA I TAYLOR, CLAYTON L GEN COOP. EDUC. THOMPSON, APRIL D.N. ENGLISH TIDWELL, MICHAEL C DANCE TREADWAY, PATRICIA G DRAMA TURNER, ALVIN G SECURITY OFFICER WARREN, JUDITH SOCIAL STUDIES WASHAM, RICHARD R SCIENCE WATSON, CLAUDIA G voe. BUSINESS ED. WATSON, MONICA RENEE GUIDANCE COUNSELOR WELLS, GEORGIA K LIBRARIAN - SECONDARY WHITE, DERRICK CUSTODIAN WILSON, PHILLIPS MATHEMATICS I WISENER, KAREN K ORAL COMMUNICATIONS WOOD, TOMMIES ENGLISH l 2501 BARROW RD LITTLE ROCK 72204 PHONE 228-3000 FAX: 228-3061 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM 319 N PINE PHONE 671-6290 PRINCIPAL: LILLIE CARTER LITTLE ROCK 72205 FAX: 671-6287 ASHCRAFT, KELLY MICHELLE SPECIAL EDUCATION AUNDRA, EASTER LIBRARY CLERK BROWN, REBECCA RUTH ELEMENTARY V CARTER, LILLIE M ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL CORROTHERS, DONNA M ELEMENTARY V DAVIS, MARJORIE D ELEMENTARY Ill DAVIS, TERRIE ELEMENTARY Ill DECLUE, TRACY A KINDERGARTEN FOUNTAIN, SANDRA GIFTED \u0026amp; TALENTED GILLESPIE, MARYL LIBRARIAN - ELEMENTARY HANLEY, GEORGETTE SPEECH THERAPY HOLMES, DWAYNE AIDE - SUPERVISION HUNT, LORIE ANN PARAPROFESSIONAL IVY, NANCY GIFTED \u0026amp; TALENTED JONES, ANNETTE D CUSTODIAN MASSANELLI, NATHALIE A ELEMENTARY I MATHENY, JUNE W ELEMENTARY II MCBRYDE, LESLIE M PARAPROFESSIONAL MONTGOMERY, MELISSA G SPECIAL EDUCATION NEAL, JAMIE L KINDERGARTEN NEHUS, SHERRY ANN OCCUPATIONAL THERA. NORTHCUTT, MARGIE E SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL PERRY, MARY PARAPROFESSIONAL PETERSON, YVETTE R ELEMENTARY I PIAZZA, OLIVIA ANN KINDERGARTEN SANDERS, LEATHEL CUSTODIAN - HEAD STRICKLAND, MARGARET SPEECH THERAPY TARRY, MARIA S ELEMENTARY IV WESTBROOK, ADRIANNE ROSE MUSIC WHITE, TONI D LAB ATTENDANT WHITE-ERWIN, PATRICIA K GUIDANCE COUNSELOR WILSON, CAROLYN A AIDE - SUPERVISION WOODELL, PEGGY CLAY ELEMENTARY IV WOODS, EVA p ELEMENTARY II YATES, MARY p ELEMENTARY IV YOUNG-GIVENS, ANGELA D PARAPROFESSIONAL PULASKI HEIGHTS MIDDLE 401 N PINE PHONE 671-6250 PRINCIPAL: NANCY ROUSSEAU LITTLE ROCK 72205 FAX: 671-6294 ALMON, WALDINE CAROLINE LIFE SCIENCE LEWIS, LISA C SCIENCE BARBOUR, DUANE J BAND DIRECTOR LINDSEY, DWAYNE SECURITY OFFICER BENNETT, CECELIA R DATA PROC/COMP TECH. LYNCH, JANK READING BLACKSTONE, NANCY P ENGLISH MACK.BRENDA MENTAL HEALTH COUN. BLANN, CAROL M SPECIAL EDUCATION MCFADDEN, ELIZABETH K FRENCH BOOTH, CARLETTE R AIDE MCFARLAND, AMY B LEARNING FOUNDATIONS BRASELTON, ALICE BOOKKEEPER MITCHELL, BETTY L SPECIAL EDUCATION BROWN, ERICK D. ART/COACH MITTELSTAEDT, ANNE MARIE SPECIAL EDUCATION BUFORD, JANET M SOCIAL STUDIES MOORE, BRANDY M voe. BUSINESS ED. BURROUGH, JOANN ENGLISH MOORE,CAROLBEENE PRE-ALGEBRA BYRNE, ROISIN SPANISH MOORE, EDDIE CUSTODIAN CALLAWAY, DWIGHT J SOCIAL STUDIES MUNSON, BETH ENGLISH CARDIN, JOHNA LYNN ENGLISH NEHUS,SHERRY OCCUPATIONAL THERA. COLEMAN JR, GEORGE M ARKANSAS HISTORY NELSON, WILLIE D voe. CAREER ORIENT. COMBS, DIANE M. MATHEMATICS OSBURN, ANNA MARCELLA SCIENCE COOK, TRELA V MATHEMATICS I PAYNE JR, JOHN W BUILDING ENGINEER COOMBS, WOODROW THOMAS SOCIAL STUDIES PHILLIPS, TERRI L PHYSICAL SCIENCE DANIELS, MABLE L GUIDANCE COUNSELOR PRITZ, COLLEEN MATHEMATICS DOUGLAS, MARTHA S HOME ECONOMICS RICHARDSON, KEITH L CIVICS EASTER JR, L.B. FINE ARTS (ART) ROUSSEAU, NANCY L SECONDARY PRINCIPAL FAKOURI, CATHY H IN SCHOOL SUSPENSION SMITH, CALVIN D CUSTODIAN - HEAD FLEMING, CAROL B SPEECH PATHOLOGY SNIEGOCKY, VIRGINIA L. SCHOOL NURSE FOREHAND, SHIRLEY R ALGEBRA I STEEN, KATHERINE S HOME ECONOMICS FRIEDMAN, AMY MEDIA CLERK STEWART, SHIRLEY A GIRLS PE GRANDY, SAMMY L ASST. PRINCIPAL SWEAT, JESCENA BOYS \u0026amp; GIRLS PE GREEN,RAEFANIE ENGLISH THOMPSON, MERLIN LEE SCIENCE HALEY, HAZEL A AIDE - SPECIAL ED. THOMSEN, ARDELL L LIBRARIAN HARRIS, HERBERT E ASST. PRINCIPAL WAGSTER, GREGORY ALLEN SPECIAL EDUCATION HARRISON, BRENDA FAY ENGLISH WALKER, SHEILA R. PRE-ALGEBRA HAWTHORNE, PEGGY CARNAHAN GUIDANCE COUNSELOR WALTHER, TAMMY SUE ENGLISH HOGG, JACQUELINE 0 SOCIAL STUDIES WEST, TRINTY YOLANDA HEALTH HOLLADAY, ROBERT Y SECURITY OFFICER WILLIAMS, LARRY L CUSTODIAN HUGHES.SUSANNE LIFE SCIENCE WIMBERLY, JONATHAN C SOCIAL STUDIES HUIE, JESS R. VOCAL MUSIC WOOLE, RICKY EDWARD LEARNING FOUNDATIONS HUNTER, LYDIA B SPECIAL EDUCATION ISEL Y, RANDY LEA ENGLISH JARRETT, KATHERINE A REGISTRAR JEFFERSON, LARRY L CUSTODIAN - ASST. HEAD JOHNSON, MARY C SPANISH KAFFKA, CAROL B EARTH SCIENCE KEMP, W. LYNETTE ASST. PRINCIPAL KIRWIN, PATRICK 0 LEARNING FOUNDATIONS LEVY, BARBARA N SECRETARY - PRINCIPAL LEWALLEN, MARILYN S SPECIAL EDUCATION RESIDENTIAL ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL PRINCIPAL: KRISHNA YOUNG BROWN, EDMONDA TRENISE DUNAHAY, KIMBERLY R. EASTER, RANDALL J HARRIS, VOUNCILE M HAWKINS, CLIFFORD W. JEFFERSON, CYNTHIA B KELLEY, DARLENE MCDUFFIE, AMY DENISE TWEH, AMBER J YOUNG, KRISHNA L ALT LEARNING TEACHER AIDE AIDE ALT LEARNING TEA\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eLittle Rock School District\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n "}],"pages":{"current_page":1,"next_page":2,"prev_page":null,"total_pages":3,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":0,"total_count":26,"first_page?":true,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":26}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":3},{"value":"Arkansas. Department of Education","hits":2},{"value":"United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit","hits":1},{"value":"United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"Education--Arkansas","hits":26},{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":24},{"value":"Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","hits":20},{"value":"School management and organization","hits":12},{"value":"Education--Evaluation","hits":8},{"value":"Educational law and legislation","hits":8},{"value":"Educational planning","hits":5},{"value":"Educational statistics","hits":5},{"value":"Arkansas. Department of Education","hits":4},{"value":"School employees","hits":4},{"value":"Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","hits":3}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":26},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":26},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":26},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":24}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Arkansas","hits":26}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"2001","hits":18},{"value":"1999","hits":17},{"value":"2000","hits":17},{"value":"1996","hits":16},{"value":"1997","hits":16},{"value":"1998","hits":16},{"value":"1995","hits":13},{"value":"1994","hits":12},{"value":"1993","hits":10},{"value":"2002","hits":10},{"value":"1992","hits":9},{"value":"1991","hits":7},{"value":"2003","hits":6},{"value":"2004","hits":5},{"value":"2005","hits":5},{"value":"1990","hits":4},{"value":"1988","hits":2},{"value":"1989","hits":2},{"value":"2006","hits":2},{"value":"2007","hits":2},{"value":"1973","hits":1},{"value":"1974","hits":1},{"value":"1975","hits":1},{"value":"1976","hits":1},{"value":"1977","hits":1},{"value":"1978","hits":1},{"value":"1979","hits":1},{"value":"1980","hits":1},{"value":"1981","hits":1},{"value":"1982","hits":1},{"value":"1983","hits":1},{"value":"1984","hits":1},{"value":"1985","hits":1},{"value":"1986","hits":1},{"value":"1987","hits":1},{"value":"2008","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"1973","max":"2008","count":205,"missing":0},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":20},{"value":"exhibition (associated concept)","hits":2},{"value":"judicial records","hits":2},{"value":"prints (visual works)","hits":1},{"value":"project management","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":26}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Office of Desegregation Management","hits":26}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":26}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":26}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":26}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}