{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"suc_simkins_6","title":"Proclamation of Modjeska Monteith Simkins Day","collection_id":"suc_simkins","collection_title":"Modjeska Monteith Simkins: In Her Own Words","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, South Carolina, Richland County, 34.0218, -80.90304"],"dcterms_creator":["Simkins, Modjeska Monteith, 1899-1992"],"dc_date":["1991"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["University of South Carolina. South Carolina Political Collections"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["From Modjeska Monteith Simkins Papers, Biographical Papers. Located in South Carolina Political Collections.","Modjeska Simkins: In Her Own Words"],"dcterms_subject":["African Americans--South Carolina--History","African Americans--Civil rights--History--20th Century"],"dcterms_title":["Proclamation of Modjeska Monteith Simkins Day"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["South Caroliniana Library"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["https://digital.tcl.sc.edu/digital/collection/simkins/id/6"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Digital image copyright 2011. The University of South Carolina. All Rights Reserved. For more information contact South Carolina Political Collections, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208."],"dcterms_medium":["manuscripts (documents)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Simkins, Modjeska Monteith, 1899-1992"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_717","title":"\"Proposed Planning Report, 1986-87-1991-92''","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1991"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","Education--Finance"],"dcterms_title":["\"Proposed Planning Report, 1986-87-1991-92''"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/717"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nDr. Ed Kelly, superintendent\nProposed Planning Report 1986-87 - 1991-92 Dr. Ed Kelly, Superintendent Little Rock School District 810 West Markham St. Little Rock, Arkansas1 Mission Statement Sequence of Events Priorities Organizational Chart Enrollment Projections TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 2 5 7 8 I ) I I !l I' I Comparative School Profile (Staffing) 21 I I Financial Assumptions and Revenue Estimates 42 Student Al locations 46 I !' 1 , Building Utilization Projections 47 Program Plans by Year 51 f ( I 1986-87 52 Goals and Objectives for 1986-87 53 ,1 i  I 11 Calendar for All Contract Lengths 57 I Support Services 64 Educational Programs 75 1 I Administrative Programs 95 t 1987-88 111 ) 1988-89 144 1989-90 162 1 1990-91 177 1991-92 185 i Ji' !i I I 1 i i I I MISSION STATEMENT I OF THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT The mission of the Little Rock School District is to provide an educational program that enables each child to achieve his/her highest potential. To that end, the Little Rock School District will provide: (1) a program of basic education for all students\n(2) programs that address the special needs of students (emotional, physical, and mental)\nand (3) enrichment opportunities such as art, music, and athletics. Through an organized program of studies, each student will experience academic success and will learn and appreciate responsibility and productive citizenship. I I' 1 I I 1 1 I i1 -1- i I J I ) I I I I I If I PLANNING SEQUENCE FOR THE 1986-87 SIX-YEAR PLAN AND MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PLAN i The 1986-87 six-year plan cannot be based upon an evaluation of what happened during the 1985-86 school year because there is not enough time to evaluate the year before the term report has to be filed. Therefore, it must be based upon the results of the 1984-85 school year. For purposes of clarification, the mission statement adopted by the Board of Directors will be the general goal of the District. All activities of the District will be centered around that mission statement. The goals that are stated in the first year of the six-year plan are goals that have been established that will be addressed in the six-year plan. These are the specific plans around which the plan will be written. The annual goals that are adopted by the Board prior to the beginning of the school year will be used as specific measurements by which the District will be able to evaluate its growth. GOALS FOR MEASURING GROWTH 1 GOALS FOR THE SIX-YEAR PLAN MISSION STATEMENT 1. The District administrators will evaluate the degree to which the 1984-85 goals were reached. 2. 3. The Board of Directors will approve the goals for the 1985-86 school year, (see attached) 1 I The District will hold three public meetings for the purpose of receiving input from the citizens concerning the 1986-87 school year. The dates for those meetings are listed below. i Rockefeller Intermediate School - September 19, 1985 Pulaski Heights Junior High School - September 23, 1985 Parkview High School - September 30, 1985 , I 4. Appoint a planning coordinator November, 1985. t 5. The Board of Directors will adopt a mission statement November, 1985. 1 I i I I -2- I j  6. The Superintendent will appoint grade level and/or subject area committees composed of staff members to study their respective areas. Recommendations will be presented to the Superintendent prior to December. 1985. 7. The individual buildings will begin to plan how they will receive community input for developing tneir building plan. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 1 The Superintendent will prepare for the Board a six-year plan. The plan will be presented to the Board prior to January 22, 1986. The District will conduct a series of public meetings for the purpose of sharing the plan with the public and for the purpose of receiving input on the plan. Those meetings are scheduled as listed below. On or about January 28, 1986 On or about February 5, 1986 On or about February 13, 1986 The Board of Directors will conduct a series of public work sessions on the proposed six-year plan. The Board of Directors will discuss the proposed six-year plan at regularly scheduled Board meetings in January, February, and March. The public shall have the opportunity to address the Board about their concerns relating to the planning report. The Board shall adopt the six-year plan on or before May 1, 1986. The Board shall adopt the individual building plans on or before May 15, 1986. The District and the individual building plans will be submitted to the Arkansas Department of Education prior to July 1, 1986. The District will evaluate the degree to which the goals established for 1985-86 school were attained and report those to the Board and the public prior to September 1, 1986. The Board will adopt goals for the 1986-87 school year prior to the beginning of the 1986-87 school year. The Superintendent will announce the dates for the public meetings for the purpose of hearing concerns of the public on items included in the 1987-88 school year prior to October 1, 1986. The Board will adopt or modify the mission statement prior to December 1, 1986. -3- 1 Revised 8-28-85 1 IITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT GOALS/OBJECTIVES 1985-86 1. 2. 3. At least eighty-five (85%) percent of the students in the Little Rock School District will master the skil1s/competencies on the Arkansas Minimum Performance Test (grades 3, 6, and 8) and the Little Rock School District Criterion Referenced Test (Grades 1, 2, 4, 5 ) in the 1985-86 school year. At least seventy-five (75%) percent of the students as determined by performance on a standardized test measure will show individual growth of at least one year and one month or be at least one year above grade 1evel. The school climate at individual buildings will improve as evidenced by: a. b. decrease in behavioral incidents that cause classroom and building disruptions and result in administrative referrals and/or suspensions. increase in parental participation. I I r c. improved attendance. d. reduction in the number of class tardies. e. f. improved building cleanliness. increase in student participation by race and sex in extracurricular activities. (Where the race is in a minority increase must be shown.) (1) more black student participation in academic and service club activities. 4. (2) more white student participation in athletic activities. The difference between the percentage of black students above grade level and the percentage of white students above grade (5) percent as measured by stan- level will decrease by five dardized tests. 5. 6. Teacher absences due to short term illness (1-19 days) will be decreased by ten (10) percent over the 1984-85 school year. Ninety (90) percent of the parents who complete the \"Quality of Education\" survey that will be conducted during the 1985-86 school year will rate the quality of education being provided in the Little Rock School District as satisfactory. (This goal will not be used in principal's evaluation.) -4-I PRIORITIES First Priority A. To help all students receive and master the tools for learning: 1 . 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. reading writing mathematical skills science and scientific skills study skills speaking (communication) creative thought critical thought B. To develop in students an awareness and an appreciation of their heritage: 1 . 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. history music art language literature politics economics philosophy sociology Second Priority The second level of priorities are listed below. These are. as the rafpnnri-zation of second priority suggests, not as important as the areas in the first priority. These are areas in which the educational system should assist but for which it should not assume primary responsibility. The * schools do not have the financial capability nor the expertise to assume total responsibility for these activities. 'I I a a II I I! The development of socialization skills and internprsnnal tjki 1 1 \u0026lt;:: f I 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. counseling services psychological services health education sex education drug education extracurricular activities -5-  1 1 fl fl Third Priority Support services or logistical concerns:  f 1 . 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. business concerns personnel functions school lunch programs school transportation programs negotiations and contract management building use and maintenance I Fourth Priority 1 These areas could be classified as \"other\" functions with which the schools become involved: I 1. 2. 3. i hot breakfasts day care centers community use of facilities 3 -6- I I I ri Hrwi I Director of Communications Associate Superintendent PRINCIPALS-CommunitY I Board oi Directors Superintendent Special Assistants Associate Superintendent Evaluallon/Testing Salety Pupil Accounting Student Records Desegregatlon/Human Relations Manager for Support Services Administrative Assistant Director ol Special Education [Supervisors ol Special Education Director of Vocational-Technical Education [Supervisors of Vo-Tech Education Director of Physical Educallon/Alhleflcs Stall Academy Director ol Personnel Director ol Federal Programs [pAC Coordinator Coordinator of VIPS Legislation Litigation Director ol Pupil Services Administrative Assistant Director ol Financial Services Director ol Data Processing Director ol Plant Services Facilities Coordinator Supvs. of Custodians Supv. ol Adult Education Supv. ol Engllsh/Soclal Studies Supv. ol Elementary Education Supv. ol Instructional Technologies Supv. ol Math Supv. ol Reading/Director of IRC Supv. ol Music Supv. ol Science Coord, ol Cultural Arts Resources Coord, ol Gilled/Talenled Nurses Guidance Counselors Social Workers Psychological Examiners CARE Program Director ol Purchasing [warehouse Manager Director of Transportation [Supvs. of Transportation I Difflctor of Food Service Supvs. of Food Service Warehouse Manager J I ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 1986-87 by Grade Level I I 4$ t !L I 1 -8- T r \u0026amp; (  f'** Little Rock Public Schools November 26, 1985 TO: FROM: Dr. Ed Kelly, Superintendent of Schools Dr. Leonard L. Thalmueller, Special Assistant // to the Superintendent, Evaluation and Testing SUBJECT: Projected Enrollment for 1986-87 Attached are the enrollment projections for the 1986-87 school year. The October 1, 1985, enrollment data and the percentages of change in the primary, intermediate, junior high, and senior high levels over a four-year period were used in calculating the projected enrollments. Basic Assumptions 1. The present school organization will remain intact for the 1986-87 school year. 2. The October 1, 1985, enrollment summary is accurate. 3. The pattern during the past four school years will continue into the 1986-87 school year. 1I These projections represent the enrollments anticipated for October 1, 1986. em JI cc: Executive Staff 3 p p -9- I I 5 * ft. _ jg SCHOOL BUILDING CAPACITY UNGRADED CENTRAL HALL PARKVIEW METROPOLITAN TOTAL SENIOR HIGH 2050 1250 1150 N/A 4450 19 19 I o I Special Schools Kindergarten Primary Elementary Intermediate Junior High Senior High Total ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 1986-87 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 10th GRADE 818 402 417 1637 Actual Enrollment October 1, 1985 15 1 ,640 2,925 3,619 2,559 4,484 4,057 19,299 nth GRADE 614 346 334 1294 SUMMARY 12th GRADE 533 289 344 1166 SUBTOTAL 1965 1037 1095 19 4116 Projected Enrollment October 1, 1986 15 1,634 2,974 3,613 2,681 4,358 4,116 19,391 KINDERGARTEN 63 25 19 107 Percent Change 0 -0.4% +1.7% -0.2% +4.8% -2.8% +1.5% +0.5% TOTAL 2028 1062 1114 19 4223 li   J 4i iMUtl Iw  lit  - i SCHOOL BUILDING CAPACITY UNGRADED DUNBAR FOREST HEIGHTS HENDERSON MANN PULASKI HEIGHTS SOUTHWEST TOTAL JUNIOR HIGH 870 725 1000 950 725 765 5035 13 13 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 1986-87 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 7 th GRADE 165 240 229 355 245 221 1455 Sth GRADE 178 246 241 342 246 227 1480 9th GRADE 173 237 271 286 238 205 1410 TOTAL 516 723 754 983 729 653 4358 I I 1J SCHOOL BOOKER FRANKLIN GARLAND GIBBS PULASKI HEIGHTS ROCKEFELLER STEPHENS WASHINGTON TOTAL INTERMEDIATE BUILDING CAPACITY 620 490 465 350 500 450 400 330 3605 UNGRADED 36 19 55 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 1986-87 INTERMEDIATE SCHOOLS 4 th GRADE 180 133 100 92 130 95 114 80 924 5th GRADE 178 130 111 90 128 101 98 72 908 6 th GRADE 164 110 84 79 130 90 79 58 794 SUBTOTAL KINDERGARTEN TOTAL 558 373 314 261 388 286 291 210 2681 558 68 88 48 26 150 51 47 478 441 402 309 414 436 342 257 2159. L J J a a a a n CALE SCHOOL BUILDING CAPACITY UNGRAOEL) 1st GRADE 465 12 75 CARVER ISH KING MITCHELL RIGHTSELL 455 375 280 255 375 9 84 57 83 73 72 I co I ROMINE WESTERN HILLS WILSON SUBTOTAL ELEMENTARY WILLIAMS MAGNEl GRAND TOTAL ELEMENTARY 585 210 470 3470 530 4000 99 49 77 21 21 669 72 741 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 1986-87 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS 2nd GRADE 69 65 46 70 47 68 90 52 5 593 75 668 3rd GRADE 57 66 50 54 54 58 61 48 57 505 78 583 4 th GRADE 56 43 55 67 36 40 77 33 51 468 72 540 5 th GRADE 56 55 45 50 45 44 66 44 4 469 63 532 6th GRADE 50 49 49 60 33 40 63 49 0. 453 75 528 SUBTOTAL KINDERGARTEN TOTM 375 362 311 384 288 322 456 275 405 3178 435 3613 75 50 50 51 49 50 100 41 52 518 0 518 45C 412 361 435 337 372 I 556 31S 457 3656 435 4111 JI E . IBIm BRADY SCHOOL BUILDING CAPACITY 450 FAIR PARK FOREST PARK FULBRIGHT JEFFERSON MCDERMOTT MEADOWCLIFF TERRY WOODRUFF TOTAL PRIMARY SCHOOLS 300 450 590 465 565 470 535 300 4125 UNGRADED 10 19 29 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 1986-87 PRIMARY SCHOOLS 1st GRADE 138 99 99 141 105 176 141 165 92 1156 2nd GRADE no 75 94 109 84 150 120 116 58 916 3rd GRADE 92 61 90 84 100 134 103 138 71 873 SUBTOTAL KINDERGARTEN TOTAL 340 235 283 344 308 460 364 419 221 2974 50 63 47 57 75 63 50 75 51 531 390 298 330 401 383 523 414 494 272 3505 7 1 1 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 1986-87 Through 1991-92 1 I I I. I 1 I j I -15-Utti mhuI immI UM' ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS SUMMARY 1986-87 THROUGH 1991-92 I ! ENROLLMENT PRIMARY INTERMEDIATE ELEMENTARY JUNIOR HIGH SENIOR HIGH TOTAL 1-12 .1 I I -1 1986-87 2974 531 2681 478 3613 518 4358 4116 107 17,742 1634 - 2 Lui 1987-88 2993 541 2849 474 3689 525 4342 4056 107 17,929 1647 I II i I i 1 o ex 5 Q Lui I o ex: 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 3015 3023 3084 3131 551 560 571 583 2888 2936 2984 3034 472 469 467 464 3773 3877 3995 4071 534 543 549 557 4284 4248 4199 4156 4062 4069 4077 4085 107 107 107 107 18,022 18,153 18,339 18,477 1664 1679 1694 1711 t r f I I I f II  1 - 3 K 4 - 6 K 1 - 6 K 7 - 9 i I I I I * These data do not include approximately fifteen students who likely will be assigned to schools such as, Fullerton, Francis Allen, Pathfinder, and Youth Home. TeH mi s ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS SECONDARY SCHOOLS 1986-87 THROUGH 1991-92 r ( SCHOOL PROJECTED ENROLLMENT 1986-87 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT 1987-88 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT 1988-89 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT 1989-90 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT 1990-91 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT 1991-92 1 I I I ! SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 10-12 K 10-12 K 10-12 K 10-12 K 10-12 K 10-12 K I I t r Central 1965 63 1947 63 1972 63 1998 63 2026 63 2054 63 I 'i I I Hall 1037 25 1056 25 1056 25 1056 25 1056 25 1056 25 r Parkview 1095 19 1033 19 1014 19 995 19 975 19 955 19 II I I Metropolitan 19 20 K 20 20 20 20 I I L I I I II 1- I II I u k TOTAL SENIOR HIGH JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Dunbar Forest Heights Henderson Mann Pulaski Heights Southwest TOTAL JUNIOR HIGH 4116 7 - 9 516 723 754 983 729 653 4358 107 4056 107 4062 107 4069 107 4077 107 4085 107 K 7 - 9 496 728 680 1039 747 652 4342 K 7 - 9 K 7-9 K 7-9 K 7 9 K 1 465 716 636 1051 757 659 4284 437 415 400 J i 728 596 1068 762 657 4248 735 742 561 531 1086 1105 748 728 654 650 ) ( 4199 4156 *Represents the full-time students at Metropolitan. rw\"! A] ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS INTERMEDIATE SCHOOLS 1986-87 THROUGH 1991-92 II SCHOOL PROJECTED ENROLLMENT 1986-87 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT 1987-88 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT 1988-89 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT 1989-90 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT 1990-91 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT 1991-92 INTERMEDIATE SCHOOLS 4 - 6 K 4-6 K 4-6 K 4 - 6 K 4-6 K 4 - 6 K Booker 558 608 609 609 609 609 I I 00 I t j Franklin Garland 373 314 68 88 399 326 63 88 403 321 59 88 405 327 55 88 407 330 51 88 410 332 47 88 T\u0026lt; i ir Gibbs 261 48 270 48 262 48 255 48 247 48 240 48 Pulaski Heights 388 26 385 27 383 28 386 29 390 30 395 31 I I Rockefeller 286 150 306 150 315 150 319 150 324 150 330 150 Stephens 291 51 333 52 360 53 384 54 409 55 434 56 t i Washington 210 47 222 46 235 46 251 45 268 45 284 44 I L I TOTAL INTERMEDIATE 2681 478 2849 474 2888 472 2936 469 2984 467 3034 464 u I, ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS 1986-87 THROUGH 1991-92 SCHOOL PROJECTED ENROLLMENT 1986-87 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT 1987-88 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT 1988-89 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT 1989-90 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT 1990-91 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT 1991-92 CO 4- I ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS 1 - 6 K 1 - 6 K 1 6 K 1 - 6 K 1 6 K 1 6 K Bale 375 75 427 75 482 75 528 75 575 75 610 Carver 362 50 354 50 345 50 350 50 352 50 350 50 Ish 311 50 303 50 ,294 50 278 50 267 50 262 50 Ki ng 384 51 401 52 430 53 441 54 462 54 480 55 Mitchel 1 288 49 292 49 286 49 293 49 291 49 294 49 Rightsei 1 322 50 331 50 336 50 347 50 348 50 350 50 Romine 456 100 462 104 465 no 481 115 513 120 520 I 125 Western Hills Wil son Williams Magnet TOTAL ELEMENTARY 275 405 435 3613 41 52 518 255 422 442 3689 41 54 525 251 435 449 3773 41 56 534 257 447 455 3877 41 59 543 258 470 459 3995 41 60 549 260 480 465 4071 41 62 557 Ilin a E ftSwfcj I ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS PRIMARY SCHOOLS 1986-87 THROUGH 1991-92 SCHOOL PROJECTED ENROLLMENT 1986-87 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT 1987-88 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT 1988-89 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT 1989-90 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT 1990-91 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT 1991-92 I I I I I I r t I k i I h ki ti f I I PRIMARY SCHOOLS Brady Fair Park Forest Park Fulbright Jefferson McDermott Meadowcii ff Terry Woodruff TOTAL PRIMARY 1 - 3 340 235 283 344 308 460 364 419 221 2974 K SO 63 47 57 75 63 50 75 51 1 - 3 K 1 - 3 K 1 - 3 K 1 3 K 1 - 3 K 360 249 283 340 289 481 372 412 207 2993 50 65 43 57 75 65 60 75 51 541 378 259 258 340 287 495 369 428 201 3015 SO 67 41 58 75 67 67 75 51 551 398 270 225 344 287 506 369 436 188 3023 SO 69 38 60 75 69 73 75 51 560 421 282 222 351 291 519 378 444 176 3084 SO 71 35 63 75 71 80 75 51 571 446 295 210 357 294 534 378 452 165 3131 SO 74 32 66 75 73 87 75 51 583 ( ( i I 1 I I I COMPARATIVE SCHOOL PROFILES (STAFFING) 1985-86/1986-87 i I I ! I s J B I -21-HIGH SCHOOL 1985-8I) COMPARATIVE SCHOOL PROFILE CENTRAL 1986-87 Change 1985-86 HALL 1986-87 Change 7 ! p ENROLLMENT K 10 11 12 Ungraded TOTAL ENROLLMENT* STAFF, CERTIFIED English/Language Arts Journa1i sm Speech/Drama Reading Mathematics Science Social Studies Vocational Ed. Business Ed. Distr. Ed. Home Ec./Child Devel Health/P.E. Foreign Languages Mu', i ( Art ROTO Special Ed. Counselors E i bra r1ans Speech Therapy Admini s tra tor'. TOTAL certifiedSTAFF STAFF, NON CERTIFIED Clerical Custodia1 Food Service Nurses I I I i I I1 I Aides (except CARI) Instructional Superv i sory I TOTAI NON'CE'RTIFIFt) tOtaC staff Students arc counted at their base schools 63.0 763.0 607.0 556.0 0.0 63.0 818.0 614.0 533.0 0.0 25.0 380.0 300.0 324.0 0.0 25.0 402.0 346.0 289.0 0.0 1989.0 2028.0 (+39.0) 1029.0 1062.0 I 16.0 1 .0 3.2 2.0 12.0 8.8 9.0 5.0 8.0 3.0 7.0 5.0 6.2 2.2 2.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 2.0 16.0 1 .0 3.2 2.0 12.0 8.8 9.0 5.0 8.0 3.0 7.0 5.0 6.2 2.2 2.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 2.0 8.2 1 .0 1 .4 1 .0 6.0 4.6 5.2 5.6 5.4 1 .0 2.6 3.0 4.4 1 .6 1 .0 0.0 3.0 4.0 1 .0 8.2 1 .0 1 .4 1 .0 6.0 4.6 5.2 5.6 5.4 1 .0 2.6 3.0 4.4 1 .6 1 .0 0.0 3.0 4.0 1 .0 r 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 .109.4 109.4 (0) 64.0 . 64.0 (Q) 14.0 12.0 7.0 1 .0 14.0 12.0 7.0 1 .0 8.0 10.0 5.0 .5 8.0 10.0 5.0 .5 t L II I\" 1,1 I 3.0 3.0 1 .0 1 .0 37.0 37.0 (0) , .24,5_____ 24.5 __(0_l 146.4 146.4 _X0) J._84t.5 88.5 ZCOJ -22- HIGH SCHOOL 1985-86 COMPARATIVESCHOOL PROFILE METROPOLITAN PARKVIEW 1986-87 Change 1985-86 1986-87 Change I' ir: ] I I ENROLLMENT K 10 11 12 Ungraded TOTAL ENROLLMENT* STAFF, CERTIFIED Engli sh/Language Arts Journa1i sm Speech/Orama Reading Mathematics Science Social Studies Vocational Ed. Business Ed. Uistr. Ed. Home Ec./Chi 1d Devel Health/P.E. Foreign 1 anguaejes Muit Art ROTC Special Ed. Counselors Librarians Speech Therapy Admin i s t rators lOTAL CERYi'FIEO STAFF STAFF. NON CLRTIFILI) Clerical Custodi a I Food Service Nui'ses Aides (except CARL) I ns true t i ona1 SupervIsory TOTAl NON CERT IFILO TOTAL STAFF Students are counted at their base schools I 19.0 19.0 656.0..........'656.0 25.5 25.5 2.0 2.0 .2 2.0 2.0 29.7 29.7 (0): 2.0 5.0 1 .0 1 .0 2.0 5.0 1 .0 1 .0 I 2.0 1 .0 2.0 1 .0 12.0 41 .7 -23- 12.0 4'1 .1 (0) 20.0 403.0 383.0 321 .0 0.0 19.0 417.0 334.0 344.0 0.0 1127.0  111'4.0 Fn.'o) 9.6 1 .0 2.0 1 .0 8.0 5.0 5.4 4.8 6.0 1 .0 3.0 3.0 3.2 2.0 1 .0 2.0 3.4 4.0 1 .0 9.6 1 .0 2.0 1 .0 8.0 5.0 5.4 4.8 6.0 1 .0 3.0 3.0 3.2 2.0 1 .0 2.0 3.4 4.0 1 .0 I I 4.0 4.0 70.4 70.4 (0} I 8.0 8.0 3.0 .5 8.0 8.0 3.0 .5 L 1 .0 1 .0 ^L.L*2d.5 'JjCo} _ l-lQ) I ' 90.9' 90.9 Ml I I. H ' L 'I' iJI I I COMPARATIVE SCHOOL PROFILE [ JUNIOR HIGH DUNBAR FOREST HEIGHTS /aE-a ENROLLMENT 7 89 Ungraded total' ENROLLMENT* 198*^-86 1986-87 Change 1985-86 1986-87 Change a STAFF, CERTIFIED English/Language Arts Journali sm Speech/Orama Reading Mathematics Science Social Studies Vocational Ed./Career Ed. Business Ed. Distr. Ed. Home Ec. Health/P.E. Foreign Languages Musi c Art ROIC Special Ed. Counselors 1 ibra ri ans Speech Therapy Admi n i s tra tors lOIAL CERTIFIED STAU I I t 1 '.lAFl . NON CERTIFIED C 1 ei'i ea 1 Cus todi a 1 Food Servict* Nurses I Aides (except CARE) 1 ns true t i ona1 Superv i sory I 1 101 Al NON CERT I I I ED I 10TA1 staff 4 Students are counted at their base schools 175.0 183.0 228.0 0.0 586.0 5.0 3.0 5.2 4.6 5.0 3.2 1.0 2.6 1.6 2.0 1 .0 2.0 3.0 1 .0 3.0 43.2 3.0 6.0 4.0 .3 13.3 56.5 -24- 165.0 178.0 173.0 0.0 516.0, LJC-lQiO 5.0 3.0 5.0 4.0 4.8 3.2 1 .0 2.6 1 .6 2.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 1 .0 3.0 42.2 3.0 6.0 4.0 .3 13.3 55.5 i I I I (-1-0) I I iI (0) (-1.0) I i I I 1 i 241 .0 240.0 253.0 0.0 240.0 246.0 237.0 0.0 734,^0 ^723,0____QT. 0} 6.4 6.4 3.0 6.8 5.2 5.8 3.6 1 .0 3.0 6.8 5.2 5.8 3.6 1 .0 I I ! 1 3.4 1 .6 1 .4 1 .0 3.4 1 .6 1 .4 1 .0 i t 1i . I 3.0 2.0 1 .0 3.0 2.0 1 .0 3.0 3.0 48.2 48.2 (0) 3.5 6.0 7.0 .5 3.5 6.0 7.0 .5 'I I [ 17.0 17.0 (0) 65.2 65.2 (0) H. ' i  ii-i ! 'ic! t f T JUNIOR HIGH ENROLLMENT 789 Ungraded TOTAL'ENROLLMENT* STAFF. CERTIFIED English/Language Arts Journa 1 i srn Speech/Draina Reading Mathematics Sc i ence Social Studies Vocational Ed./Career Ed. Business Ed. Distr. Ed. Home Ec. Health/P.E. Foreign Languages Music' Art ROIC Special Ed. Counselors I ibr.irians Speech Therapy Adminis trators I 245.0 290.0 280.0 13.0 828.0 7.4 4.0 6.8 6.8 6.8 2.6 1 .0 3.0 2.0 2.2 1.0 5.0 3.0 1 .0 3.0 COMPARATIVE SCHOOL PROFILE HENDERSON 1986-87 Change 229.0 241 .0 271 .0 13.0 754.0 7.2 4.0 6.6 6.4 6.6 2.6 1 .0 3.0 2.0 2.2 1 .0 5.0 3.0 1 .0 3.0 MANN 1985-86 355.0 292.0 268.0 0.0 ( -74- 0l_., '91. O 8.2 3.0 7.6 9.8 6.0 4.0 1 .0 101 AL CERTIFIED STAFI 55.6 54,6 (-1.0) 1986-87 Change 355.0 342.0 286.0 0.0 1 i 1 1 I ...._Z983',__[+6o) 9.0 3.0 8.0 10.0 6.2 4.0 1 .0 I i I I STAFF. NON CERTIFIID C 1 er i Cl) 1 Lus tod i a 1 Food Service Nurses I I 1( i i i i I Ii 2.2 1 .6 1 .6 1 .0 2.2 1 .6 1 .6 1 .0 5.0 3.0 1.0 5.0 3.0 1 .0 I 3.0 3.0 58.0 59.6 (+1.6) i!i 4.0 8.0 6.0 .5 4.0 8.0 6.0 .5 I I 4.0 7.0 6.0 .5 4.0 7.0 6.0 .5 i 1 H. 1 Aides (except CARI ) 1 ns true t iona1 Superv1snry lOIAl NON CiRTIFlED total staff Studentb are counted at their base schools 11 I 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 24.5 24.5 (0) I I i 3.0 3.0 80.1 79.1 (-1.0) -25- 20.5 20.5 (0) 78.5 80.1 (1.6) COMPARATIVE SCHOOL PROFILE JUNIOR HIGH PULASKI HEIGHTS SOUTHWEST 1980-87 Change 1985-86 1986-87 Change fl ENROLLMENT 7 89 Ungraded 240.0 239.0 252.0 9.0 245.0 246.0 238.0 9.0 222.0 215.0 244.0 0.0 221 .0 227.0 205.0 0.0 fl total\" E'NROLLMENT*  740.0 738.0 (72.0) _^68]_.0____ 653.0 . (-28.0) fl fl fl I STAFF, CERTIFIED Engli sh/Language Arts Journa1i sm Speech/Urarna Reading Mathematics Sc i ence Social Studies Vocational Ed./Career Ed. Business Ed. Distr. Ed. Home Ec. Health/P.E. Foreign 1, anguages Music Art RO 11 jpecial Ld. Counselors I ill IS) ri,) ns Speech Therapy Admi nistrator s I i 5.6 5.6 6.0 6.0 lOlAl ClRIIFITl) SIAM MAI 1 , NON Cl RI II Ii.p (. 1 er ) c.i 1 Cus tod i ,11 Iood Service Nurses I I i Aides (excepi (ARI ) 1 os tr'ui 1100a 1 luper'v 1 sor-y s OHAI non (J HI II ill) lOlAl MATT Students are counted at their base schools 3.0 5.6 5.6 5.6 2.6 .6 3.0 5.6 5.6 5.6 2.6 .6 3.0 5.2 4.8 5.0 2.2 .8 3.0 5.2 4.8 5.0 2.2 .8 2.8 2.0 1 .2 1 .0 2.8 2.0 1 .2 1 .0 II 2.2 1 .2 2.0 1 .4 2.2 1 .2 2.0 1 .4 4.2 3.0 1.0 4.2 3.0 1 .0 I 3.0 3.0 I II 4.0 3.0 1 .0 4.0 3.0 1 .0 3.0 3.0 46.8 46.8 (0) 44.8 44.8 (0) 3.5 6.0 7.0 .3 3.5 6.0 7.0 .3 1 I I I i i 16.8 16.8 (0) I 63.6 63.6 {0}  -26- 3.0 5.0 7.0 .3 3.0 5.0 7.0 .3 1 .0 1 .0 16.3 16.3 (0) 61 .1 61.1 (0) ''SI J COMPARATIVE SCHOOL PROF IL E INTERMEDIATE BOOKER FRANKLIN 1I9 ENROLLMENT K 4 5 6 Ungradlid TOTAL ENROLL'mLNT 1985-86 1986-87 Change 1985-86 1986-87 Change 1 STAFF, CERTIFIED I ns true ti ona1 K 4 5 6 Ungraded TOTAL INSTR.' S'TA'FF ' %Isi AVG. CI ASS SIZE \" I sIIClAl INSTR. SIAII I I bra ri (ins Music leathers Art Tf'achers Counselors Resourte Room (Sp. In.) Ch. 1 Readin\u0026lt;) Ch. I Math f 1 P.L. Teachers Adm Inis Lra Lors Speech Therapy 101Al CLRTITIEd STAH SI AFI , NGN CERTIFIED C let) (, a 1 Custodia1 I ood Scrv 11.(.' Nurses A i\u0026lt;lf. ((XI cpt CARI ) 1 ns t. riji t iona 1 Superv1sory T0TAL_N0N CLRTJFILI) total staff i I I I I I I I I I I I 179.0 141 .0 160.0 37.0 180.0 179.0 164.0 36.0 74.0 131 .0 109.0 145.0 0.0 68.0 133.0 130.0 110.0 0.0 Tu'.o\" 6.0 6.0 7.0 5.0 24.0,, 21 .5 1 .0 1 .5 1 .0 .3 1.5 2.0 1.0 1 .0 2.0 2.0 37.3 2.5 5.0 5.0 0.0 10.0 4.0 26.5 63.8 659 .d  {,+42.0) 7. .459. d 44h0_ __,_{-18^0) 7.0 7.0 7.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 3.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 0.0 I _2A.fO   X+2Xi ' 18.0 JL.0_ _ _ 21 .5 1 .0 2.0 2.0 .3 1 .5 2.0 1 .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 41 .8 2.5 5.0 5.0 0.0 10.0 4.0 26.5 68.3 (0) I i I I (+4.5) J I (o) I I I i I 25.5 25.9 ( + .4) fc -11- 1 .0 .5 .2 .3 2.0 1 .0 1 .0 0.0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 .5 .2 .3 2.0 1 .0 1 .0 0.0 1 .0 1 .0 26.0 25.0 (-1.0) 2.0 4.0 4.0 .3 2.0 4.0 4.0 .3 1 .0 2.2 1 .0 2.2 13.5 ,.13.5_____(0) (+4.5)1 39.5 \" 38.5 (rb.O) I 4 3 7 T COMPARATIVE SCHOOL PROFILE INTERMEDIATE ENROLLMENT K 4 5 6 Ungraded T_OTAL XnMlME_NT  STAFF, CERTIFIED I ns true ti ona1 K 4 5 6 Ungraded JJS1C,s1af ' avg. class size GARLAND GIBBS I I 1985-86 1986-87 Change 1985-86 1986-87 Change n dFClAl INSTR. STAII LI bra f ians Music Teacher-s Art Teachers Counsel 0 r*. Resource Room (Sp. Id.) Ch. I Readinij Ch. I Math P.L. Teachers Administrators Speech Thera()y I I total CERTirirD SJAFf I I SIAFI , NON CERTIFIED (Clerical Custod i a 1 loud Service Nurses 1 I * i I I i I Aide', (e^xcept (.API ) In', t.riK t lon.il Superv1 SOIy 1 I t I Wkk.NQN C'E'RTIFIED iPJAl:. 8tAF 87.0 109.0 87.0 113.0 19.0 88.0 100.0 111 .0 84.0 19.0 49.0 95.0 77.0 83.0 0.0 48.0 92.0 90.0 79.0 0.0 I, I  41570' '\"40270 (''3-OT'L3O4._O_\nlo?-Zo7ZZIt5^o) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 18.0 23.0 1 .0 .5 .4 .3 2.0 1.0 1 .0 1 .0 .6 25.8 1.5 3.0 3.0 .3 3.0 1.7 12.5 38.3 \"1'8.0 14.0 T4.0 is:: -28- 22.3 1 .0 .5 .4 .3 2.0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 .6 25.8 1 .5 3.0 3.0 .3 3.0 1.7 12.5 38.3 (-.7) (0) [ I I I I II I i (0) _ 21 .7 1 .0 .5 .4 .3 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 .4 20.6 1.5 3.5 4.0 .3 1 .0 1 .6 11.9 (0) L.. 32.1 22:0I+.3') 1 .0 .5 .4 .3 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 .4 20.6 1 .5 3.5 4.0 .3 1 .0 1 .6 - J_b9_ 22^ I (0) (0) ::cq)_\nh 7 COMPARATIVE SCHOOL PROFILE INTERMEDIATE PULASKI HEIGHTS ROCKEFELLER 1985-86 1986-87 Change 1985-86 1986-87 Change w ENROLLMENT K 45 6 Ungraded TOTAL ENROLLMENT STAFF, CERTIFIED Instructional K 4 5 6 Ungraded TOTAL INSTR. STAFF \" AVO. CLASS SIZE ' Ul (,|AI INSIR. SIAM I 25.0 131 .0 130.0 108.0 0.0 26.0 130.0 128.0 130.0 0.0 150.0 97.0 88.0 76.0 0.0 150.0 95.0 101 .0 90.0 0.0 I i II I 394,0 414.0 (+20.01 .411 '.0 T .43.JL_X+21..O) 1 .0 5.0 4.0 6.0 0.0 1 .0 5.0 4.0 6.0 0.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 i! ( 16.0 16.0 (or: 18_.-0______ m... s, I 24.6 25.8 (+1.2) t 22.8 24.2 ^I+lJ) ' I 1 I hr.i r I an Music Teachers Art, TeacFiers Counselors Resource Room (Sp. id.) Ch. 1 Reiidint) Cii. 1 Ma t il P.E. Teachers Administrators Speech Therapy total certified STAFF STAFF , NON CERTIFlED C1 er 1 (.a 1 Cus tod i a 1 Food Servite Nurses Aides (except CARI ) Inst rue 11ona1 Superv1sory JlQN CER11F irp total STAFF-I I I IIII I I I 1 .0 .5 .2 .3 2.0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 .5 .2 .3 2.0 1 .0 1.0 I I i 1 .0 .5 .4 .3 1 .0 1 .0 0.0 1 .0 .5 .4 .3 1 .0 1 .0 0.0 il ' t : i 1 .0 .4 1 .0 .4 II 1 .0 .6 1 .0 .6 23.4 23.4 (0) t I ! I 23.8 23.8 (.0) I il I 1 I' 1.5 3.0 0.0 .5 1 .5 3.0 0.0 .5 I I I 1 .5 3.5 4.0 .5 1 .5 3.5 4.0 .5 1 .0 1 .9 1 .0 1 .9 1 .0 1 .3 1 .0 1 .3 I! . 1 1- i!. 7.9 7.9 (0) 11.8 ~ 11.8~~' Co) I SI .3 31 .3 (0) 35.6 35.6 .(0) I I I 1 li -29- II 1 I I 5 COMPARATIVE SCHOOL PROFILE I INTERMEDIATE ENROLLMENT K 4 5 6 Ungraded TOTAL' ENROLLMENT STAFF, CERTIFIED Instructional K 4 5 6 Ungraded TOTAL TNSTR. STAFF '' AYG. CLASS size SPECIAI INSTR. STAFF I. i brar ians Music Teachers Art Teachers Counselors Resource Room (Sp. Ed.) Ch. I Readintj Ch. I Math P.E. Teachers Administrators Speech Therapy I 1985-86 50.0 103.0 79.0 72.0 0.0 304.0 2.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 12.0 25\n3  .5 .5 .4 .3 3.0 1 .0 0.0 1 .0 .5 STEPHENS 19.86-87 Change 1985-86 WASHINGTON 1986-87 Change I 1 IO 19.2 I I STAFF , NON CERTIFIED Clerical Custodial Food Service Nurses i 2.0 3.0 3.0 .3 Aides (excepi (.ARI ) 1 ns truet i ona1 Superv1sory I 1 .0 1 .6 total non'C'ERilFl EO LQIAL^tafT'.... 10.9 51.0 114.0 98.0 79.0 0.0 342_.O ' 1+38.0} 2.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 0.0 13.0 I+l^ 48.0 76.0 70.0 44.0 0.0 47.0 80.0 72.0 58.0 0.0 238.0 257.0 (+19.01 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 0.0 ( 10.0 10.0 '26.3 I+iYol......_y_.8_ Ma9), .5 .5 .4 .3 3.0 1 .0 0.0 1 .0 .5 20.2 2.0 3.0 3.0 .3 1 .0 1 .6 .5 .5 .4 .3 1.0 1 .0 0.0 .5 .5 .4 .3 1 .0 1 .0 0.0 I I 1 .0 .4 1 .0 .4 (+1 - OL ' Y5 J1 .15.1 _ -.(0), 3o_J\n:L jij ?~ (+i\nb) -30- 2.0 3.0 3.0 .3 2.0 3.0 3.0 .3 if : I 1 .0 1.1 1 .0 1.1 10.4 10.4 ..J.CQl 1 \u0026lt; 25.^ 25^PRIMARY COMPARATIVE SCHOOL PROFILE BRADY FAIR PARK I ENROLLMENT K123 Ungraded (Sp. Ed.) 1985-86 1986-87 Change 1985-86 1986-87 Change ' 'I s TOTAL ENROLLMENT STAFF, CERTIFIED Instructional K 1 2 3 Ungraded (Sp. Ed.) TOTAL INSTR. STAFF I' AVG. CLASS SIZE SPECIAL INSTR. STAFF Librarians Music Teachers Art Teachers Counselors Resource Room (Sp. td.) Ch. I Reading Ch. I Math P.L. Teachers Admini strators Speech Therapy totalcertified stafi STAFF. NON CERTIFIED C1 eri ca1 Custodial Food Service Nurses s Aides (except LARI ) Inst rue 11ondI Superv1sory 110N.Cj._RXl_FIL0 T0IA13TA1T------ 47.0 132.0 102.0 94.0 50.0 138.0 110.0 92.0 JZ5. Q____ 390.0____t+I5_,01 2.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 15.0 15.0 UH _ _____ 25.0______ 26.. 0____(+1.0) 1 .0 .5 1 .0 .5 I .3 1 .0 1.0 1 .0 .3 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 21 .8 21 .8 (0) 1.5 3.0 4.0 .3 1 .5 3.0 4.0 .3 1 .0 2.1 1 .0 2.1 11.9 11.9 (oi._: 33.7 -31- 62.0 95.0 67.0 66.0 61 .0 99.0 75.0 61.0 II i 290.0 296.0 I+6,OJ  3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 22.3 .5 .5 .3 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 19.3 2.0 3.0 3.0 .3 1 .0 2.0 IJ ..3 33.7. -.,-101,. .L._30,L_ 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 10} .5 .5 .3 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 19.3 2.0 3.0 3.0 .3 1 .0 2.0 (0) 11. J____ 10). 30.6 1 (Oj I I ( i' I I t I I' 1 COMPARATIVE SCHOOL PROFILE PRIMARY J 1985-86 JEFFERSON MCDERMOTT 1986-87 Change 1985-86 1986-87 Change i ENROLLMENT K123 Ungraded (Sp. Ed.) 71 .0 107.0 101 .0 94.0 18.0 75.0 105.0 84.0 100.0 19.0 65.0 171 .0 138.0 104.0 0.0 63.0 176.0 150.0 134.0 0.0 ( Ia TOTAL ENROLLMENT 391.0 383.0 I=ajU. 478.0 523.0 (+45.0) I ' I STAFF. CERTIFIED Instructional K 1 2 3 Ungraded (Sp. Ed.) TOTAL INSTR. STAFF AVG. CLASS SIZE r I1 3 SPECIAL INSTR. STATE L i bra rians Music Teachers Art Teachers Counselors Resource Room (Sp. Ed.) Ch. I Reading Ch. I Math P.L. Teachers Admini s tra tors Speech Therapy total' CERTIFIED STATE I I STAFF. NON CERTIFIED Clerical Custodial Food Service Nurses I 1 Aides (except (ARI ) I ns trui t i ona1 Superv1sory I TOTAim CERjjriED TOKriTATT'-- 3.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 5.0 3.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 7.0 6.0 4.0 0.0 3.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 0.0 II 18.0 17.0 1-1... 0) X+LJD. 21 .7 1 .0 1 .0 .3 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 24.3 1 .5 2.0 4.0 .3 3.0 1 .4 12.2 ... 36.5. 22.5 7+-8y 1 .0 1 .0 .3 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 23.3 1.5 2.0 4.0 .3 3.0 1 .4 12.2 I 23.9 1 .0 1 .0 .3 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 24.9 I+l.O) 1 .0 1 .0 .3 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 (-1.0) 26.3 27.3 (+1-0) 1 .5 3.0 5.0 .3 1 .5 3.0 5.0 .3 1 1 .0 1 .8 1 .0 1 .8 I (0). ____ 12.6______ _Cq) Z 35 Z Zl-ltQ) .L. -38,9_ .35. 9. (+1.0) -32- ..s I T I PRIMARY COMPARATIVE SCHOOL PROFILE MEADOWCLIFF 1985-86 1986-87 Change 1985-86 TERRY 1986-87 Change a3s ENROLLMENT K123 Ungraded (Sp. Ed.) 50.0 144.0 107.0 115.0 43.0 141 .0 120.0 103.0 75.0 149.0 138.0 115.0 75.0 165.0 116.0 138.0 I TOTAL ENROLLMENT 416.61 24O7.6 19^ 477.0 494.0 (+17.0) pI STAFF. CERTIFIED Instructional K 1 2 3 Ungraded (Sp. Ed.) 2.0 6.0 4.0 5.0 2.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 3.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 r TOTAL INSTR. STAFF 17.0 16.0 (--bQl 21 .0 21.0. IM i AVG. CLASS SIZE SPECIAL INSTR. STAFF L ibrarians Music Teachers Art Teachers Counselors Resource Room (Sp. Ed.) Ch. I Reading Ch. I Math P.E. Teachers Administrators Speech Therapy totalCERTIFIED STAFF 2'4V4 23.9 22.7 23.5 I+^8J 1 .0 .5 1 .0 .5 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 I 1 I staff, non CERTIFIED Clerical Custodial Food Service Nurses I Aides (except CAKE) I ns true tlona I SupervIsory I j i TOTAL NON CERTIFIEO total' staff .3 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 23.8 1 .5 3.0 4.0 .3 1 .0 2.0 11.8 .3 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 22.8 1.5 3.0 4.0 .3 1 .0 2.0 11.8 (-1.0) .3 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 .3 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 28.3 2.5 4.5 5.0 .3 1 .0 2.6 28.3 _ (0) 2.5 4.5 5.0 .3 1 .0 2.6 ! (0)_______15.9_______ J5.2_____ XQ) 35.6 ....,3A.6_ ._Irl.Q)_L._44,2______44^ (Q) I i h. -33- i COMPARATIVE SCHOOL PROFILE ^1 h PRIMARY FOREST PARK FULBRIGHT 1985-86 1986-87 Change 1985-86 1986-87 Change 1 ENROLLMENT K123 Ungraded (Sp. Ed.) 50.0 98.0 91 .0 109.0 0.0 47.0 99.0 94.0 90.0 0.0 58.0 141 .0 101 .0 102.0 10.0 57.0 141.0 109.0 84.0 10.0 i. Ii TOTAL ENROLLMENT 348.0 330.0 (-18.0) 412.Q 4Q1.0 t-n.oj -a STAFF, CERTIFIED Instructional K 1 2 3 Ungraded (Sp. Ed.) 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 3.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 1 .0 3.0 6.0 4.0 3.0 1 .0 Are I Is TOTAL INSTR. STAFF MG. CLASS SIZE SPECIAL INSTR. STAFF L ibrar ians Music Teachers Art Teachers Counselors Resource Room (Sp. Ed.) Ch. I Reading Ch. I Math P.L. Teachers Admini strators Speech Therapy TOTAL CERTIFIED STAR STAFF, NON CERTIFIED Clerical Custodial Food Service Nurses Aides (except CARI ) Instrut 11ond 1 Superv i sory TOTAL NO'N CERTIFIED total STAFF 4- 14.0 14.0 ioi 18.0 17.0 L--L-Q) ^_24r8 23.5____ 22,.-a___ 23 ..5_____ t+JJ 1 .0 .5 .3 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 19.8 2.0 3.0 2.0 .3 3.0 1.9 12.2 1.0 .5 .3 1 .0 1 .0 1.0 1 .0 19.8 2.0 3.0 2.0 .3 3.0 1 .9 (0) 1 .0 .5 1 .0 .5 .3 1 .0 1 .0 .3 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 23.8 22.8 (-1-.0) 2.0 3.0 5.0 .3 2.0 3.0 5.0 .3 3.0 2.1 3.0 2.1 (0) _ J5-5 15.4 {.0} 32,0.___ 13210, lllQL JZ _3_9_.L2_1 ._,_3K.2 .(-T.0) -34- PRIMARY 1985-86 COMPARATIVE SCHOOL PROFILE WOODRUFF 1986-87 Change 1985-86 1986-87 Change I1 \u0026lt; .1 I i I ENROLLMENT K123 Ungraded (Sp. Ed.) TOTAL ENROLLMENT STAFF. CERTIFIED Instructional K 1 2 3 Ungraded (Sp. Ed.) TOTAL INSTR. STAFF AVG. CLASS SIZE SPECIAL INSTR. STAFF L i bra ri ans Music Teachers Art Teachers Counselors Resource Room (Sp. Ed.) Ch. I Reading Ch. I Math P.L. Teachers Admi ni s trators Speech Therapy TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF STAFF, NON CERTIFIED Clerical Custodia1 Food Service Nurses Aides (except CARL) I ns true Liona1 Superv i sory TOTAL NON'certified TWL~sTA7r 59.0 84.0 71 .0 59.0 0.0 51.0 92.0 58.0 71 .0 0.0 273\no-- -27270 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 5.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 13.0 13.0 101 I 21 .0 20.9 .5 .5 .5 .5 I ' J I I !\nj '  It J .3 .5 1 .0 1 .0 .5 17.3 2.0 2.5 2.0 .3 1 .0 1.4 9.2 .3 .5 1 .0 1 .0 .5 17.3 2.0 2.5 2.0 .3 1 .0 1 .4 (0) 9,2 .......(OJ______ 26.5 \" 26.5 \"(Of -35- I I , , I i ' ' I': I,! i ! i I J Till bh fli I i 1 II I Ii T COMPARATIVE SCHOOL PROFILE ! i ELEMENTARY BALE CARVER i 1985-86 1986-87 Change 1985-86 1986-87 Change I 1 I 1 ENROLLMENT K123 4 56 Ungraded TOTAL ENROLLMENT STAFF. CERTIFIED Instructional K 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ungraded TOTAL INSTR. STAFF\" AVG. 'CLASS' SI'ZE SPECIAL INSTR. STAFF Librarians Music Teachers Art Teachers Counselors Resource Room (Sp. Ed.) Ch. 1 Reading Ch. I Math P.E. Teachers Administrators Speech Therapy TOTAL CER'TIFIED STAFF ' STAFF. NON CERTIFIED Clerical Custodial Food Service Nurses Aides (except CARE) Instructional Supervisory total non CERTIFIED TTyTAL\" STAFF I i 75.0 60.0 50.0 55.0 51 .0 49.0 43.0 12.0 75.0 75.0 69.0 57.0 56.0 56.0 50.0 12.0 50.0 83.0 63.0 60.0 63.0 54.0 46.0 0.0 50.0 84.0 65.0 66.0 43.0 55.0 49.0 0.0 I 395.0 450.0 (+55.0) 419.0 412.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 0.0  18.0 19.0 19X1_____ 19_.P______ LOX . 21\n9'\"' 23.6 (+1.'7') \"22.0 21'.6 (-.4) 1 .0 .5 .4 .3 1 .0 1.0 0.0 1 .0 2.0 1 .0 .5 .4 .3 1 .0 1 .0 0.0 1 .0 2.0 1 .0 .5 .4 .3 2.0 2.0 1 .0 1 .0 .5 .4 .3 2.0 2.0 1 .0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 ^2^2 26.2 r+1-0) 2872 28.2 Jol77 1 .5 3.0 3.0 .5 3.0 2.1 BTT 38.3 1 .5 3.0 3.0 .5 3.0 2.1 TXT 39.3 1 .5 3.5 5.0 .5 1 .0 2.3 liJ. 42.0 1 .5 3.5 5.0 .5 1 .0 2.3 13.8 UU 7 ELEMENTARY 1985-86 COMPARATIVE SCHOOL PROFILE ISH KING 1986-87 Change 1985-86 1986-87 Change 1 ip1 1 1 -A ENROLLMENT K123 4 5 6 Ungraded TOTAL ENROLLMENT STAFF, CERTIFIED Instructional K 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ungraded TOTAL INSTR. STAFF AVG. CLASS SIZE SPECIAL INSTR. STAFF L ibrari ans Music Teachers Art Teachers Counselors Resource Room (Sp. Ed.) Ch. 1 Reading Ch. I Math P.E. Teachers Admi ni strators Speech Therapy TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF STAFF, NON CERTIFIED Clerical Custodial Food Service Nurses Aides (except CARE) Instructional Supervisory total NON CERTI FlEB total staff 50.0 57.0 59.0 56.0 50.0 48.0 46.0 7.0 50.0 57.0 46.0 50.0 55.0 45.0 49.0 9.0 50.0 86.0 55.0 65.0 48.0 64.0 45.0 0.0 51.0 83.0 70.0 54.0 67.0 50.0 60.0 0.0 I 373.0 361 .0 (-12.0) 413.0 435.0 (+22.0) 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 16.0______15.0 23.3 1 .0 1 .0 .5 .3 2.0 2.0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 ____ 25.8 1.5 3.0 4.0 .4 2.0 1 .7 12^ 38.4 2.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 1 ! (-1..0)____ 17^.0______ 18.a_. 2~4'.O ' '(+.7} 1 .0 1.0 .5 .3 2.0 2.0 1.0 1 .0 1 .0 24.2 24.1 -(1.0.) I 1 .0 .5 .4 .3 1 .0 1 .0 0.0 1 .0 1 .0 ( 24\\8r_ _23^ 1.5 3.0 4.0 .4 2.Q 1.7 12^ UI 2ZU JUL.0J 1.5 3.0 4.0 .3 1 .0 1.1 11^ 1 .0 .5 .4 .3 1 .0 1.0 0.0 1 .0 1 .0 24.2 1.5 3.0 4.0 .3 1 .0 1 .7 Iki 35.7 t ib(bj Bi (i) . 0 Hi' I'I 1 I if -11 I1 ELEMENTARY 1985-86 COMPARATIVE SCHOOL PROFILE MITCHELL 1986-87 Change 1985-86 RIGHTSELL 1986-87 Change ENROLLMENT K123 4 5 6 Ungraded TOTAL ENROLLMENT STAFF. CERTIFIED Instructional K 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ungraded TOTAL INSTR. STAFF MG. CLASSSfZE SPECIAL INSTR. STAFF Librarians Music Teachers Art Teachers Counselors Resource Room (Sp. Ed.) Ch. I Reading Ch. I Math P.E. Teachers Administrators Speech Therapy TOTALCERT1FIEO STAFF \" STAFF. NON CERTIFIED Clerical Custodial Food Service Nurses Aides (except CARE) Instructional Supervisory tutal non cEftnniD total STAFF 50.0 58.0 64.0 43.0 51 .0 35.0 47.0 0.0 49.0 73.0 47.0 54.0 36.0 45.0 33.0 0.0 50.0 78.0 62.0 47.0 45.0 40.0 56.0 0.0 50.0 72.0 68.0 58.0 40.0 44.0 40.0 0.0 f I 348.0 337.0 UlUU 378.0 2ZZJ1 1-6.0). 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1 .0 0.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1 .0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1 .0 2.0 1670 2177 1 .0 1 .0 .4 .3 1 .0 2.0 1.0 1 .0 1.0 U.l 1 .5 2.0 2.0 .3 1 .0 1 .7 317? -38- 141P \"  'r-2,.. 0L_ .16,0. ____ 16..0_____ 2470 1 .0 1 .0 .4 .3 1 .0 2.0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .5 2.0 2.0 .3 1 .0 1 .7 T+2.3y ~ 23.6 23.2 (-4) I 1 .0 .5 .4 .3 3.0 3.0 1 .0 1 .0 .5 .4 .3 3.0 3.0 1 .0 1 1 .0 .5 1 .0 .5 J. _Z2'^-J ______ (Qi 3T7~2 7-7-07 26.7 iol 1 .5 3.0 4.0 .3 3.0 1 .4 13.2 1 .5 3.0 4.0 .3 3.0 1 .4 13.2 30^ I 1 nn Hl li I Ji 7 ELEMENTARY ENROLLMENT K123 4 5 6 Ungraded TOTAL ENROLLMENT 1985-86 95.0 96.0 69.0 85.0 73.0 68.0 84.0 570.0 COMPARATIVE SCHOOL PROFILE ROMINE 1986-87 Change WESTERN HILLS 1985-86 1986-87 Change STAFF. CERTIFIED Instructional K 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ungraded 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 TOTAL INSTR. STAFF 24.0 AVG. CLASS SIZE ^2 I 100.0 99.0 90.0 61 .0 77.0 66.0 63.0 556.0 (-14.0) 41 .0 56.0 54.0 41 .0 39.0 54.0 41 .0 41.0 49.0 52.0 48.0 33.0 44.0 49.0 326.0 316.0 MQ-0) - I I 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1 .0 2.0 2.0\ni  24-b - JQI_____ 14^ 13.0,____(-K0) II 22x1 23.2 24.3 SPECIAL INSTR. STAFF Librarians Music Teachers Art Teachers Counselors Resource Room (Sp. Ed.) Ch. I Reading Ch. I Math P.E. Teachers Admi ni strators Speech Therapy TOTAL* CERTIFIED staff STAFF. NON CERTIFIED Clerical Custodial Food Service Nurses I il Aides (except CARE) Instructional Supervisory wial non ccftTiriCD B^tAl staff 1.0 1 .0 .2 .3 1 .0 1 .0 1.0 1 .0 1 .0 .2 .3 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 .2 .3 1 .0 1 .0 0.0 1 .0 1.0 .2 .3 1 .0 1 .0 0.0 I, 1 I i!| ri* II- 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 I II I. 11 .1 il I I * 31 ?5 31 .5 7\nJPIZL'_L,22,5 19.5 2.5 4.5 6.0 .5 2.5 4.5 6.0 .5 1 .5 2.5 2.0 .5 1.5 2.5 2.0 .5 jf ifkI 2.0 5.8 2.0 5.8 1 .0 1 .5 1 .0 1.5 2173 BIT 2x2 2J1 iPi i 52.8 52.8 -39- (0) I 2975 22^ IIJ il T Fp I I si a COMPARATIVE SCHOOL PROFILE ELEMENTARY ENROLLMENT K123 45 6 Ungraded TOTAL ENROLLMENT STAFF, CERTIFIED Instructional K 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ungraded TOTAL INSTR. STAFF AVG. CLASS SfZE SPECIAL INSTR. STAFF L ibrarjans Music Teachers Art Teachers Counselors Resource Room (Sp. Ed.) Ch. I Reading Ch. I Math P.E. Teachers Administrators Speech Therapy total certified staff ~~ STAFF, NON CERTIFIED Clerical Custodial Food Service Nurses Aides (except CARE) Instructional Supervi sory TOTAL NON CERTTmg TCTATTrAFF *Posit1ons for UnaradedStu^ WILLIAMS MAGNET 1985-86 1986-87 Change 1985-86 WILSON 1986-87 Change 0.0 75.0 71 .0 71.0 72.0 77.0 67.0 16.0 0.0 72.0 75.0 78.0 72.0 63.0 75.0 0.0 50.0 94.0 61.0 61 .0 60.0 59.0 74.0 0.0 52.0 77.0 86.0 57.0 61 .0 64.0 60.0 0.0 I 435.0 (-14.0) 459.0 457.0 (-2.0) 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 *2.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 *2.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 *1 .0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 *1 .0 I 2o:o 2O.O  lor::. 21 .0 2O.O\"3.-L_Q) 22.4 1.0 1 .0 1.0 .3 1.0 0.0 1 .0 1.0 0.0 26:3' 2.0 3.5 4.0 .5 3.0 2.0 15.0 TTTs 2_] .1_____ (.-_^ 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 .3 1 .0 0.0 1 .0 1 .0 0.0 26.3 2.0 3.5 4.0 .5 3.0 2.0 15.0 21 .8 1 .0 .5 .2 .3 .5 1 .0 0.0 1 .0 1 .0 (0] 26'. 5 IS IS 22.8 ~ (+1.0) 1 .0 .5 .2 .3 .5 1 .0 0.0 1 .0 1 .0 25.5 (-1.0) I J I 2.0 3.5 5.0 .3 2.0 3.5 5.0 .3 ( 3.0 4.4 3.0 4.4 18.2 44.7 iS^ 43.7 in !' r (-1-Q) .3 T T J I I PERSONNEL SUMMARY I! ' I 1 1985-86 1986-87 Positions Total Regular Federal Total Regular Federal i Admini strators Teachers Clerical Central Admin. School Secretaries Library Clerks Federal Health/Social Services Nurses Social Workers Therapists Psychological Examiners Support Personnel Food Service Transportation Custodial Maintenance Aides Instructional Instructional Assistants Non Instructional *40.4 FTE GRAND TOTAL 1 127 116.1 10.9 127 116.1 10.9 1191.3 1047.2 144.1 1186.9 1039.2 1 147.7^ 55.5 76.5 31 2.9 16 2 2 1 145 111 180.5 37 51 28 75 2138.7 53.5 70.5 31 16 2 4 111 180.5 31 28 28 69* 2 6 2.9 2 3 145 23 6 1 55.5 76.5 31 2.9 16 2 2 7 145 111 180.5 37 51 28 75 2134.3 53.5 70.5 31 16 2 4 111 180.5 37 28 28 69* 2 6 2.9 2 3 145 23 6 Reflects a net decrease of 4.4 FTE derived from the following reductions and additions: Reductions Addi tions Dunbar Henderson Frankl in Jefferson Meadowci iff Fulbright Woodruff Ish Mitchell Western Hills Wilson 1.0 1.0 1 .0 1 .0 1.0 1.0 1 .0 1 .0 2.0 1 .0 1.0 77:0 Mann Booker Stephens McDermott Bale King 1 .6 2.0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 1 : I I I 1 I : -41- II j h I i h 3 I i FINANCIAL ASSUMPTIONS AND REVENUE ESTIMATES 1 1 ( t '11. I' 1 -42- 1 t I I\nt I SIX-YEAR REVENUE ESTIMATE ASSUMPTIONS 1986-87 THROUGH 1991-92 9 I . GENERAL SCENARIO  Revenue (jrouth will be constrained durino the period by several factors. Nationally, it is likely the administration will continue to follow policies that will \"boil the fat out\" of the economy, and the Arkansas economy will continue to do worse than the national picture. It is unlikely that federal funds for education will increase significantly even if the voucher system gets the treatment it should. Since Congress seems to have no better handle on the national economy than the administration, it is questionable that the 1988 election will have any positive effect on the economy. 1' 11 ! P I f id I 2. LOCAL REVENUES  Amendment 59 will prevent growth in local income i' from personal property until the millage rate equals that of real property (that may take ten years). Utility property income will be frozen for the first five years and will begin a reduction process in the sixth year. The growth in real property will depend on the state of the I* I economy. Ue have projected annual growth for the period at the average annual rate experienced for the past nine years. 3. STATE AID  Besides the general impact of the national economy, the agricultural outlook specifically will restrict state income in the near In addition, our form^a aid nay be reduced the first two years of the period for \"repayment\"/excess formula payments in the past two future. years. In light of these constraints, we have projected small Increases In state aid for the period. Ue have projected operational funding for the gifted and talented program for the entire period. 4. FEDERAL AID  We have not projected the Magnet School Assistance Grant in 1986-87 because, although two-year funding is the normal life of the grant, there are no guarantees. Ue should have more specific information about the grant before the 1986-87 budget Is adopted. The projection of federal aid Is baaed on Indirect costs and Impact aid. 5. BAL ANGES  The district should maintain a minimum of *1 million in the contingency throughout the period. I I I I I s -43- I I I 'Ip4 I p1 pI p 1 I 8B87rvBS DESCRIPTION BEGINNING BALANCE REVENUE LOCAL SOURCES Current Taxes Delinquent Taxes 40X Pullback Excess Treasurer's Fee Depository Interest Revenue in Lieu of Taxes Tuit ion 'Miscellaneous and Rents Interest on Investnents Athletic Receipts REVENUE TOTAL COUNTY SOURCES County General REVENUE TOTAL STATE SOURCES 1986-87 REVENUE ESTIMATE REVISION 1 (11-26-85) 85-86 ESTIMATE 86-87 ESTIMATE GAIN (LOSS) $1,13S,840 20.071.156 1,244.318 11.060.350 68.000 150,000 60.000 50,000 50,000 175,000 55,000 $32,983,824 36 $36 .000,000 (133,840\u0026gt; I I I I I I 3 Kindergarten Supplies MFPA Apportionment Vocational Guidance Handicapped Children Orphan Children Transportation High School Textbooks Gifted Grant 18.104 14,341.961 80,000 953,323 0 132,325 16,801 993,018 435,092 75,000 TOTAL $17,045,624 IS REVENUE OTHER SOURCES I I Public Lau 874 Tranefer Tron Fed. Grants Transfer Tron Bond Acct. 40,000 80,000 360.209 TOTAL $480,209 TOTAL REVENUE $51.649,533 -44- 22.364,071 1,244.318 11.597.625 68.000 150.000 60.000 50.000 50.000 175.000 55.000 $2,292,915 0 $537,275 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I i i I! r $35,814,014 Z,830,190 36 0 $36 $0 I. I ! II 18,104 14,457,967 80,000 953,323 0 132,325 16,801 1,051,233 435,092 144,269 $17,289,114 40,000 80,000 0 $120,000 $54,223,164 0 $116,006 0 0 0 0 0 $58,215 0 $69,269 1 i $243,490 0 0 ($360,209) Ir ($360,209) $2,573,631 1 I  I 1 II j 3 r iiSS^sii  YEAR 1986-87 CATEGORY BALANCE 1,000,000 LOCAL REVENUE 35,814,014 SIX-YEAR REVENUE ESTIMATES 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1,000,000 37,454,280 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 38,990,249 40,619,454 42,338,423 44,160,612 I 4^ tn I COUNTY REVENUE 36 36 36 36 36 36 STATE AID 17,290,112 17,523,309 18,049,008 18,590,478 19,148,192 20,105,602 FEDERAL 120,000 120,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 210,000 TOTAL 54,224,162 56,097,625 58,239,293 60,409,968 62,686,651 65,476,250 I T 1 I ! STUDENT ALLOCATIONS I i': I . St Allocations for materials, supplies, and textbooks will be made on the following basis: School Based Materials \u0026amp; Supplies K-6 $16.00 Junior High $17.00 s Senior High $21.00 Includes kindergarten supplies, instructional supplies, instructional equipment, library supplies, and library books. Textbooks K-6 $31.50 I i Junior High $30.00 Senior High $39.00 Includes state and local funding. I  1 I i I i! i ' -46- 5 I I g f 1 -3 BUILDING UTILIZATION PROJECTIONS I I i I\nI n  1 1 t.i I i i 1 II I I I i I I A J B I 0 b -47- T  1985-86 BUILDING UTILIZATION (Based on October 1, 1985 Enrollment) 1 SCHOOL CAPACITY ENROLLMENT Z UTILIZATION PORTABLE BLDG. CAPACITY ADJUSTED % I OF UTILIZATION ' ' s Senior High Schools I  b Central Hall Parkview Junior High Schools Dunbar Forest Heights Henderson Mann Pulaski Heights Southwest Elementary Schools Bale Carver Gillam Ish King Mitchell Rightsell Romine Western Hills Williams Wilson 2050 1250 1150 870 725 1000 950 725 765 465 455 255 375 280 255 375 585 210 530 470 1934 1008 1110 573 717 824 917 738 669 397 417 0 380 421 349 384 559 324 443 450 -48- 94Z 81Z 97Z 66Z 99Z 82Z 97Z 102Z 87Z 85Z 92Z 0 lOlZ 150Z 137Z 102Z 96Z 154Z 84Z 96Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 (1) 25 (1) 0 65 (3) 115 (5) 100 (4) 0 80 (4) 90 (4) 0 50 (2) 94Z 81Z 97Z 66Z 99Z 82Z 97Z 102Z 87Z 81Z 87Z 0 86Z 107Z 98Z 102Z 84Z 108Z 84Z 87Z I I7 1985-86 Building Utilization PORTABLE BLDG. ADJUSTED ) SCHOOL CAPACITY ENROLLMENT Z UTILIZATIONS CAPACITY OF UTILIZATION Intermediate Schools Booker 620 522 84Z 0 84Z Franklin 490 467 95Z 0 95Z Garland 465 414 89Z 0 89Z Gibbs 350 306 87Z 0 87Z Pulaski Heights 500 394 79Z 0 79Z Rockefeller 450 407 90Z 0 90Z I Stephens 400 304 76Z 0 76Z Washington 330 240 73Z 0 73Z Primary Schools Brady 450 366 81Z 0 81Z r ' 1 1 Fair Park 300 288 96Z 25 (1) 89Z i Forest Park 450 348 77Z 0 77Z I i 1 Fulbright 590 417 71Z 0 71Z Jefferson 465 394 85Z 0 85Z 1 I I i I McDermott 565 474 84Z 0 84Z Meadowcliff 470 408 87Z 0 87Z i I' Terry 535 484 90Z 15 (1) 88Z u Woodruff 300 275 92Z 0 92Z ! u ! I i r F I I a f ! I I 'I i I I -49- I IT I BUILDING UTILIZATION SUMMARY Capacity Enrollment !S Utilization High School 4450 4052 91Z 1 I Junior High School Elementary School Intermediate School Primary School TOTALS Adding the Portable Classrooms (26) Elementary Bale Carver Ish King Mitchell Romine Westren Hills Wilson Primary Fair Park Terry 5035 4255 3605 4125 21,470 Capacity 4438 4124 3054 3454 19,122 Enrollment 88Z 97X 85% 84% 89% % Utilization 25 25 65 115 100 80 90 50 550 + 4255 - 4805 4125 86% I 25 15 40 + 4125 - 4165 3454 83% The total capacity of the Little Rock School District, including portable classrooms and Gillam, Is 22,060, based on classroom sizes as specified In the new standards. The October, 1985 enrollment is 19,122. That is a difference of 2,938 excess spaces I 1 at 100% capacity. If the building capacity were at 95%, then there would be 1,835 spaces in excess space. -50- I 1 II I j f I PROGRAM PLANS BY YEAR .1 I I I (I i i I J -51- at 1 r J I 3 1986-87 a J 1 a I I I r i I 4 ji t -52- 1 I I I f  1 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 1986-87 1 1 1 I -53-r p1pg EDUCATIONAL GOALS The Little Rock School District will provide a comprehensive educational program that will enable each child to achieve his/her highest potential in the least restrictive environment. statement of Need I. I The Little Rock School District has developed a system which emphasizes a the basics in reading, mathematics, and writing skills. The District p attempts to evaluate how well the student masters these basic skills. In addition to the \"basic\" skills, the District needs to put more emphasis on the developmental skills. Students need to do more reading and writing, and develop higher level thinking skills. Objective Number One J The District will attempt to develop an early childhood program. Objective Number Two I Specific curriculum objectives and specific levels of knowledge in measurable forms for all subjects will be developed for grades 7, 8, and 9. Objective Number Three Various methods, including criterion referenced tests, will be used to test students in grades K-8 that will assess \"basic\" skills and higher level thinking skills. Objective Number Four The District will test student progress through measures other than standardized tests. Objective Number Five The District will continue to work toward the elimination of barriers that prohibit academic progress of all students. I I -54- 7 1 I 3 FINANCIAL GOALS The Little Rock School District will provide the most comprehensive programs within the limits of the District's financial capabilities. r statement of Need Limited financial resources will require the administration to manage the District on a priority basis. what items have the highest priority. Decisions will have to be made as to J New sources of revenue will be needed if special programs are to be p1 it t funded. Changes in Amendment 59 and the manner in which school districts are funded will be needed in order to improve the long-term financial position of the District. Objective Number One The District will fund programs for the 1986-87 school year on a priority basis. Objective Number Two The District administration will seek sources of revenue to fund specific programs. Objective Number Three The District administration will continue to seek more efficient ways of managing the District's limited funds. Objective Number Four The District will work cooperatively with state entities to seek improvements in the funding of education at the state and federal levels. -55- I I1I J 1 ADMINISTRATION GOALS J I . .1 The Little Rock School District administration will manage the District in a manner that will provide the most efficient and equitable education possible. I p statement of Need I There is a need to continue to improve the quality of teaching and the quality of administration in the Little Rock School District. There is a need to broaden expectations of students academically in order to avoid limiting expectations to just the \"basics.\" There is a need to increase the academic expectations of students in the \"regular\" and \"basic\" classes and avoid the development of elitism in the gifted and talented programs. There is a need to remove any barriers that prohibit the District from reaching a unitary status. There is a need to limit the administrative requirements of paperwork for teachers and a need to develop a better communication between schools concerning students who have problems that are not easily recognized through the record-keeping procedures. The District needs to eliminate the practipe of taking the teachers and principals from the building during periods of instruction. Objective Number One The District administration will examine practices of the District that are discriminatory and will remove them. Objective Number Two The District administration will remove all unnecessary and burdensome paperwork. Objective Number Three The District administration will reduce, if not eliminate, the amount of time that teachers and principals are out of the building during periods of instruction. I Objective Number Four The District administration will continue to monitor employee performance and develop strategies to improve weak performance when it is observed. I -56- I t J .urI-n I  J HBB n CALENDAR FOR ALL CONTRACT LENGTHS 83 B I rf I -57- I July WO SV I 4^' Ji' 1 ip M T W 1 2 August September LH 1 2 3 October CM CO I 1 November 3 4 5 December 1 2 3 January 87 February 2 3 4 March 2 3 4 April 1 May 0 June 1 WO 2 WO 3 Teacher Work Day - No School First Day of Student Attendance Last Day of Student Attendance Spring Vacation 1986-87 Calendar 9.25 Months - 185 Days August 21 - June 3 SH LH SD I Special Holiday Legal Holiday - No School Snow Day Inservice Day - No School O tn o  \u0026lt; tn m XJ O m X (ZV o -o s: o o Th 3 4 2 6 4 LH 1 5 5 2 SD 4 f M T W Th F M T W Th F M T U Th F M T U Th F m on co LH 4 1 5 3 7 5 SH 2 6 6 3 1 SO 5 7 4 8 6 10 8 5 9 9 6 4 SD 8 8 9 10 11 14 15 16 17 18 21 22 23 5 9 7 11 9 6 10 10 7 5 SD 9 6 7 8 11\n12 T 13 14 15 18 19 20 24 I 21 25 I 22 28 WO 25 29 WO 26 30 WO 27 31 28 29 2 2 3 7 10 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 22 23 24 25 26 29 30 21 1 21 8 9 10 13 14 15 16 17 20 i 21 22 12 13 14 17 18 19 20 21 10 11 12 15: 16 17 18 19 24\n25 SH SH 22 23 + 7 8 9 12: 13 LH WO 11 11 8 6 SO 10 14 15 16 19 20 26 SH 24 21 12 13 16 17 18 19 20 23 24 25 12 13 16 17 18 19 WO 20 SV SV 23, 24 SV 25 9 7 11 10 13 14 15 16 17 201 21 22 8 12 11 15 12 16 13 17 14 18 15 19 18, 19 22 23 + I i 20 24 23 LH 27 LH 25 22 26 SV 26 23 21 25 24 SH 28 SH 26 23 27 SV 27 24 22 26 27 28 29 30 WD 31 22 18 1 1 1 23 18 SH 29 26 30 27 LH 25 29 SH 30 SH 31 15 1 7 15 27 28 29 30 31 28 29 30 26 30 27 28 29 18 20 16 22 20 1 175 2 2 1 6 1 1 1 2 9 8 19 20 17 22 20 3 185 M I July August September October November December January '87 Februa ry March April May June wo e SV T 1 W 2 LH 1 2 3 1 3 4 5 1 2 3 2 2 1 3 3 2 1 4 4 1 3 1mm' '.iWltiU iMii' WJ Teacher Work Day - No School First Day of Student Attendance Last Day of Student Attendance Spring Vacation 1986-87 Calendar 12 Months - 240 Days July 1 - June 30 SH LH SD I Special Holiday Legal Holiday - No School Snow Day Inservice Day - No School t/i m P o O T5 o   i o I CO z o O Th 3 4 2 6 4 LH 1 5 5 2 4 F LH 4 M T W 'Th F M T W Th F M T W Th F M T U Th F co to GO o GO 1 5 3 7 5 2 6 6 3 1 5 7 4 8 6 10 8 5 9 9 6 4 8 1 8 5 9 7 11 9 6 10 10 7 5 9 9 6 10 8 12 10 7 11 11 8 6 10 10 7 11 9 13 11 8 12 12 9 7 11 1 11 8 12 10 14 12 9 13 13 10 8 12 14 15 11 : 12 15 13 17 I 16 14 18 15 i 16 12 , 13 16 16 13 11 15 17 17 14 12 16 16 13 17 15 19 17 14 18 18 15 13 17 T 17 14 18 16 20 18 15 19 19 16 14 18 18 15 19 17 21 19 16 20 20 17 li 19 21 22 23 24 25 28 29 30 31 1 22 18 I 19 22 I 23 20, 21 24 , 25 22 23 liT 19 20 23 . 24 23 24 20\n21 t 18, 19 22 23 1 20 24 22 26 SH 24 21 25 25 22 20 24 .. 21 22 25 26 27 28 29 21 25 26 29 30 1 21 23 24 27 28 29 30 31 23 LH 27 LH SH 28 SH SH 25 22 26 26 23 21 25 26 23 27 27 24 22. 26 29 26 30 27 LH 25 29 30 27 31 28 26 39 31 28 29 30 29 27 30 28 29 1 1 2 1 7 4 1 3 18 19 20 20 22 22 20 22 250 250 days minus 10 vacation days = 240 contracted day M WD SV T M July 1 2 August 'iiWIM r I cn oI LH September 1 2 3. October 1 November 3 4 December 1 2 January '87 February 2 3 Ma rch 2 3 April May WD June 1 2 Teacher Work Day - No School First Day of Student Attendance Last Day of Student Attendance Spring Vacation 1986-87 Calendar 11 Months - 220 Days July 21 - June 19 SH LH SD I Special Holiday Legal Holiday - No School Snow Day Inservice Day - No School o tz GO O -\u0026lt; GO tn m 2 O -O ( m O  o m o z GO Z o o o GO (/ Th 3 A 2 F M T M Th F M T W Th F M T W Th F M T W Th F 5 3 4 4 1 WD 3 6 4 LH 1 5 5 2 WD 4 LH 4 WD 1 5 3 7 7 WD 4 1 6 10 5 8 SH 2 6 6 3 1 WO 5 5 9 9 6 4 WD 8 8 WO 9 WO 10 WD 11 WD 14 WD 15 WD 16 WD 17 WD 18 WD WO 21 WO WD 22 WD WD 23 WD 5 9 7 11 9 6 10 10 7 5 WD 9 6 7 8 n , 12 13 14 15 18 19 20 WD 24 I 21 WO 25 I WD 28 WO WD 29 WD WD 30 WD WD 31 * 9 9 22 25 26 27 28 29 2 2 17 21 10 8 12 10 7 11 11 8 6 WD 10 11 9 13 11 8 12 12 9 7 WD 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 22 23 24 25 26 29 30 21 1 21 10 14 12 9 13 13 10 8 WD 12 13 14 15 16 i 17 20' 21 22 23 24 27 28 29 30 WD 31 22 1 23 1 17 j 18 J i 15 i 16 12\n13 16 16 13 11 WD 15 19 20 17 14 21 24\n25 SH SH 26 SH 18 15 19 16 22! 23 t LH WD 19 20 24 21 17 17 14 12 WD 16 18 18 15 13 WD 17 19 19 16 14 WD 18 LH 27 SH 28 18 1 1 18 LH 25 22 SH SH SH SH 26 29 30 31 15 1 7 15 23 26 27 28 29 30 18 2  1 1 19 20 WO 20 17 15 WD 19 23. 24 SV SV 23. 24 20| 21 18, 19 22 23 t 25 SV 25 22 20 24 26 SV 26 27 SV 27 30 31 20 16 1 20 11 23 24 21 22 27 LH 25 28 29 30 22 22. 25 26 29 26 27 28 29 20 1 20 30 1 175 2 6 9 14 15 43 220   a M M ID .V T July 1 August September LH 1 2 October W 2 3 1 f  I*\nI cn * I November 3 4 5 December 1 2 3 January '87 February 2 3 4 March 2 3 4 April 1 May June 1 WD 2 WD 3 Teacher Work Day - No School First Day of Student Attendance Last Day of Student Attendance Spring Vacation 1986-87 Calendar 10.5 Months - 210 Days July 31 - June 17 SH LH SO I Special Holiday Legal Holiday - No School Snow Day Inservice Day - No School tz* o o O m r- o cn Th 3 4 2 6 4 LH 1 5 5 2 WD 4 F M T W Th F M T U Th F M T W Th F M T W Th F I tn O -D r- m a  o X iz* co z o D LH 4 WD 1 7 WD 4 8 wo\" 5 9 WD 6 10 WD 7 11 WD 8 14 WO 15 WD 11'12 T 5 3 7 5 SH 2 6 6 3 1 WD 5 8 6 10 8 5 9 9 6 4 WD 8 9 7 11 9 6 10 10 7 5 WD 9 10 8 12 10 7 11 11 8 6 WD 10 11 9 13 11 8 12 12 9 7 WD 11 12 10 14 12 9 13 13 10 8 WD 12 isl 16 13 14 17 I 18 15 16 12: 13 16 16 13 11 WD 15 17 17 14 12 WD 16 16 WO 13 17 15 19 17 14 18 18 15 13 WO 17 17 WO 14 18 WD 15 21 WD 18 22 WD 19 23 WD 20 24 1 21 25 I 22 28 WD 25 29 WD 26 30 WD 27 WD 31 28 29 2 2 1 1 17 21 18 19 16 117 20 18 15 19 19 16 14 18 i 21 19 16 20 WD 20 17 15 19 22 20 i 23 21 24' 25 X SH SH 221 23 t LH WD 19 20 23, 24 SV SV 23, 24 20| 21 18| 19 22 23 t 1 24 22 26 SH 24 21 25 SV 25 22 20 24 1 25 23 LH 27 LH 25 22 26 SV 26 23 21 25 26 24 SH 28 SH 26 23 27 SV 27 24 22 26 29 27 SH 29 26 30 27 LH 25 29 30 28 SH 30 27 31 28 26 30 29 SH 31 28 29 27 30 29 30 28 21 1 21 WD 31 30 29 22 18 15 18 20 16 1 1 1 23 18 1 7 15 2 1 1 1 19 20 17 22 20 1 175 2 22 1 6 9 12 33 21 13 210July roos I UD SV Teacher Work Day - No School First Day of Student Attendance Last Day of Student Attendance Spring Vacation M T U Th F H T U Th F 1 2 3 LH 4 7 8 9 August September October November December January '87 February Ma rch April May June 1 4 5 6 10 WD 7 11 WO 8 r LH 1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 3 1 2 2 o 1 4 2 3 3 WO 2 5 3 4 4 1 WD 3 6 7 10 11 12 13 14 1986-87 Calendar 10 Months - 200 Days August 7 - June 10 SH LH SD I Special Holiday Legal Holiday - No School Snow Day Inservice Day - No School -\u0026lt; x co o : in O TJ C 1 tn O m z o o o M T W Th F M T W Th F M T W Th F co co co o co 14 MD 15 WO 11 12 15 i 16 T I 13 i 14 t 16 WD 13 17 15 17 I 18 19 17 WD 14 18 16 20 18 WO 15 21 WO 18 22 WD 19 23 WO 20 24 I 21 25 I 22 28 WO 25 29 WD 26 30 WD 27 31 28 29 2 2 13 17 19 17 21 22 23 201 21 24 22 25 26 29  30 21 1 21 23 24 27 28 29 39 WD 31 22 1 23 4 LH 1 5 SH 2 8 5 9 6 10 11 12 15 i 16 17 18 19 24\n25 SH SH 22! 23 LHt' WD 7 8 9 12 13 14 15 16 19 20 5 5 2 WD 4 6 9 10 11 12 13 16 17 18 19 20 23 24 6 3 1 WD 5 9 6 4 WD 8 10 11 12 13 16 17 18 19 WD 20 SV SV 23 24 7 5 WD 9 8 9 10 13 14 15 16 17 20| 21 6 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 I 18 19 26 SH 24 21 25 SV 25 22 20 WD 10 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 22' 23 1 t t 24 LH 27 LH 25 SH 28 SH 26 SH 29 SH 30 SH 31 18 15 1 1 18 1 7 15 22 23 26 27 28 29 30 18 2 1 1 19 26 27 20 20 SV 26 SV 27 30 31 16 1 17 23 24 27 28 29 30 22 22 21 22 LH 25 26 27 28 29 20 1 20 25 26 29 30 1 7 8 175 2 6 9 23 200 July cn GO  E I M August LH , September October November Oecember January '87 February March April May June 1 3 1 2 2 o 1 wo SV T 1 2 4 2 3 3 wo 2 W 2 3 1 5 3 4 4 1 wo 3 Teacher Work Day - No School First Day of Student Attendance Last Day of Student Attendance Spring Vacation 1986-87 Calendar 9.50 Months - 190 Days August 14 - June 3 SH LH SO I Special Holiday Legal Holiday - No School Snow Day Inservice Day - No School o un tz o o \u0026gt; z -\u0026lt; izv  I f c co o m o -o O m un 2 O O o (/\u0026gt; 2 \u0026gt; O X \u0026lt;  Ln o Th 3 4 2 6 4 LH 1 5 5 2 so 4 F M T W Th F M T W Th F M T W Th F M T U Th F LH 4 1 5 3 7 5 SH 2 6 6 3 7 4 8 6 10 8 5 9 9 6 8 5 9 7 11 9 6 10 10 7 9 6 10 8 12 10 7 11 11 8 10 7 11 9 13 11 8 12 12 9 11 8 12 10 14 12 9 13 13 10 14 15 16 17 18 21 22 23 11 : 12 15 13 17 I 16 14 18 15 16 12i 13 16 16 13 17 17 14 13 17 15 19 17 14 18 18 15 1 SD 5 4 so 8 5 SD 9 6 SD 10 7 8 n 12 13 11 12 15 16 17 WD 14 18 I WD 15 19 16 17 20 18 15 19 19 16 14 18 21 19 16 20 WD 20 17 15 19 WO 18 22 WD 19 23 20 21 24 25 X SH SH 22 I 23 LH WD 19 20 23 24 SV SV 23\n24 20| 21 18| 19 I 22 23 t  t - WD 20 24 22 26 SH 24 21 25 SV 25 22 20 24 24 I 21 25 23 LH 27 LH 25 22 26 SV 26 23 21 25 25 1 22 26 24 SH 28 SH 26 23 27 SV 27 24 22 26 28 29 WD 25 29 27 SH 29 26 30 27 LH 25 29 WD 26 30 28 SH 30 27 31 28 26 30 30 WD 27 29 SH 31 28 29 27 31 28 29 2 2 8 12 30 WD 31 21 22 18 15 1 1 1 1 1 7 21 23 18 15 29 30 18 20 16 30 28 29  I 2 1 1 1 22 20 1 175 2 1 2 6 9 13 19 20 17 22 20. 3 190 -i-i . -,5'  I \u0026lt;4?  JU'. SUPPORT SERVICES 1986-87 I I I. I  I I1 I X. -64- I ' *1 I I  I T n 'I: PROBLEM NUMBER ONE J 1 The current school bus fleet consists of ninety-one (91) route buses and sixteen (16) special education vehicles, the majority of which must be replaced within the next three (3) years to ensure current service levels. A. Proposed Solution I i I I I 1. Accelerate the procurement cycle of buses by entering into lease-purchase agreements. 2. Offer for sale all vehicles considered to be unrepairable. B. Analysis I i i The current bus fleet has forty-eight (48) 1977 Ford buses, most of which have in excess of 100,000 miles. The District is averaging five (5) breakdowns a day with a high (worst case) estimate of eleven (11) on any one day. Replacement parts, particularly engines and transmissions, are becoming increasingly difficult to obtain. Recognizing replacement requirements, the District has obtained ten (10) new buses each year for the past four (4) years. Continuation of this replacement cycle is required to maintain current service. A five year lease-purchase plan will allow the procurement of buses at approximately $6,400 per bus per year with a purchase option of $1 at the end of five years. The total cost of a bus 1 would be approximately $32,000 as opposed to $25,000. This would appear to be the best method of updating and increasing the fleet within yearly budgetary constraints. C. Operational Plan 1. Objectives a. To provide adequate operational vehicles to ensure service at the present levels. b. To continue replacement at minimum cost. I 2. Implementation Strategy a. Funds will be allocated to lease buses at $6,400 per bus per year. I b. Older, high mileage buses will be sold to partially alleviate the cost of the replacement program. I -65- i'T 3. Responsibility S' Under the direction of the Manager of Support Services, the Director of Transportation will be responsible for implementing this plan. 4. Evaluation I Evaluation will be based upon the time line and cost of modernizing and increasing the size of the bus fleet. pj a a 5. Cost Ten additional vehicles at $6,400 per bus per year $ 64,000 -66-T 1 PROBLEM NUMBER TWO I District lunch and breakfast programs operate as an integral part of the educational process without financial support from District operating funds. Participation in the federal child nutrition program provides free and reduced price benefits for approximately 9,500 students. Because of the federal legislative process, there is no stability in funding from year to year. A. B. Proposed Solution j I Operation of the lunch and breakfast programs will continue under the federal and state guidelines, based on available funding for 1986-87. Analysis Program income from federal reimbursement is not expected to increase by any significant amount. Child nutrition programs are up for reauthorization by Congress in 1985. Federal section 4 reimbursement is currently received for all reimbursable meals served in the program. Reimbursement for free meals. Section 11, covers the cost of raw food, labor, and other expenses, including replacement eeqquuiippmmeenntt.. The price charged for student meals increases in direct relation to rising labor (salary increases) a,.n.Jd f'o--oJd cosLts_.. The value of donated commodities received from I I a C. the United States Department of Agriculture will possibly decrease by one-half to one cent per meal. Operational Plan 1. Objectives a. b. To break even for the 1986-87 school year in the District lunch and breakfast programs. Report by July 20, 1987. 1 2. 1  To utilize microcomputer capability in supplying individual school food service operations with three financial management statements within the 175-day operating period by January 1, 1987. Implementation Strategy a. b. To direct department operations for preparation and service of 2,099,475 meals in the lunch program and 428,000 meals in the breakfast program. Monthly financial reports will be available to the Manager, Support Services, by the 20th of the second month following the report period. -67- I I 7 Ri I 3. Responsibility 3 I ss' Under the direction of the Manager, Support Services, the Director of Food Services will be responsible for implementing this plan. 4. Evaluation The District programs will be evaluated by District and State Department of Education personnel, using the Assessment Improvement Monitoring System Performance Standards and I I the Supervisory Assistance Review procedures. Financial audits will be performed by independent school auditors. State Department of Education auditors, and a commodity reviewer. 5. Cost Operational cost for all programs is anticipated to be $5,181,901 (includes no funds from District operating budget). |l! 1 'ft I1 I 1 HII li .III i' I -68- J I T T .1I ' 4 PROBLEM NUMBER THREE The existing nutrition education program for kindergarten through third grade is coordinated and funded by the Food Service Department. The funds for this program are from continuing federal grants which provide for payment of educational food experiences only. The program is an integral part of the basic skills curriculum for all students in K-3, emphasizing language arts, reading, and math skills to teach nutrition concepts. Skills are cross-referenced with the Early Prevention of School Failure Program, the Cumulative Reading Record Folder, and Mastery Skills Record for Mathematics currently used by the District. A. B. C. Proposed Solution Funding application will be made to the State Department of Education to continue the Little Rock School District nutrition education program for all students in grades K-3 for 1986-87. Analysis Federal legislation will impact the continuation of this program. Should Congress decide to cut nutrition education funds for 1987, the Nutrition Education Section of the State Department of Education would determine the outcome of the grant applications. Operation Plan 1. 2. Objective a. b. To submit a letter of application to the Arkansas State Department of Education by April 30, 1986. To coordinate the curriculum plans, revision, and implementation for the 1986-87 school year. Implementation Strategy a. b. c. Review the nutrition education curriculum with the Elementary Education Supervisor by August 15, 1986. Procure and organize the distribution of food, materials, and supplies to Kindergarten, Primary 1, Primary 2, and Primary 3 classrooms by September 30, 1986. Complete pre-test and post-test procedures at all grade levels by May 30, 1987. -69- .1 ll 3. Responsibility 1 4. -Il 5. Under the direction of the Manager of Support Services and the Director of Food Service, the Coordinator of Nutrition Education will be responsible for this plan. Evaluation a. b. c. Cost The State Department of Education requires a financial audit of grant funds. The Nutrition Education Coordinator will conduct pre-tests and post-test evaluations of randomly-selected students to measure knowledge gained through program participation. At the end of the school year, teachers will be surveyed to evaluate curriculum and program organization. Grant and coordinator's salary is $26,214. (This amount is included in Program Operation Cost in a preceding problem.) I I I -70- i 4 ri I PROBLEM NUMBER FOUR S The computer system currently makes no provision for the addition of test scores (standardized or other) into the student database. A. B. Proposed Solution The computer system should be able to capture and manipulate student test scores for both standardized tests and District-wide tests for all District students. Analysis The addition of standardized and District test scores would make it possible to produce statistics and studies of student perform-ance without the current investment in staff time. Also, the addition of these scores to the student record would become a part of the student's historical record, which could be used for longitudinal studies. The District is currently considering an in-depth evaluation of each child for placement in the gifted program. Specific computer assistance will be required in order to effectively utilize standardized test scores as a component of this evaluation and to be complete the evaluation in a timely manner for student placement. C. Operational Plan 1. 2. 3. Objective To add the ability to capture and manipulate student test scores to the District's computer system by June, 1987. Implementation Strategy During the 1985-86 school year, an analysis of the requirements for effective use of such test scores and the best method for collecting the scores will be performed. Appropriate procedures and computer programs will be developed and tested using the results of standardized tests given to students during the 1984-85 and the 1985-86 school years. The system will be implemented for all students in the 1986-87 school year. Responsibility \"I The Director of Data Processing, under the supervision of the Manager of Support Services, will be responsible for the implementation of this plan. -71- J I 4. Evaluation This plan will be considered successful if the 1987-88 multi-year analyses of student standardized testing can be performed by the computer system instead of manually and if the 1986-87 single-year analyses can also be performed using the computer system. 5. Cost Staff time 1 /A'. i 1  -72- 'I l!l r f:' hi J I n PROBLEM NUMBER FIVE 3 The lack of funds to replace antiquated equipment continues to affect the efficient operation of the District's food service facilities. The identification of equipment for replacement has been on an emergency basis as opposed to a plan. The Food Service Department has developed a manual property accounting system during the last five (5) years\nhowever, an automated system would provide timely reports that would provide better management and utilization of equipment. A. Proposed Solution Manage available resources to maintain quality nutrition feeding program. I B. Analysis The implementation of an automated property accounting system will enable the department to systematically replace antiquated equipment on a priority basis. The Food Service Department has w classified equipment and will develop an automated inventory control system, using the department microcomputer. c. Operational Plan n J- 1. Objectives a. n To implement a department automated property accounting system for food service equipment by January 1, 1987. b. B To revise plan for capital expenditures for a three-year period, based on equipment replacement schedule, using automated data and maintenance records, by May 30, 1987. B 2. Implementation Strategy a. B Complete property accounting data for input by January 1, 1986. b. Using automated property accounting reports, establish criteria and adjust plan for a five-year capital expenditure plan by May 30, 1987. 3. Responsibility Under the direction of the Manager, Support Services, the Director of Food Service will be responsible for this plan. I n 4. Evaluation I Evaluation will be based on task completion schedule. -73- *I 4' 5. Cost I No increase in funding will be required. Implementation will be through utilization of existing staff and hardware. I 3 I I 'i I t -74- ), I aS 4n 4 1 1 B] 1' K] E 1 I B 'S EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 1986-87 I r DB I I PROBLEM NUMBER ONE Many youngsters are entering kindergarten in the Little Rock School 3 District unprepared for kindergarten work, their school career at a disadvantage. A. Proposed Solution As a result, they begin A program for pre-kindergarten youngsters that will concentrate on developing the skills necessary for learning will be developed. B. Analysis Pre-kindergarten youngsters who have not been exposed to early childhood experiences that lead to learning readiness are at a disadvantage upon entering kindergarten. The Little Rock School District will develop a program to identify youngsters who need kindergarten readiness skills and offer this program on a volunteer basis at selected sites. I I il C. Operational Plan 1. Objective To offer a program to identify and serve pre-kindergarten youngsters who need learning readiness skills. 2. Implementation Plan The program will be developed prior to January, 1986, in order to begin the identification process in the spring of 1986. The number of children served will depend on the number of available teachers. Criteria for entrance to the I program will be developed prior to the identification process being developed. 3. Responsibility 4. The Associate Superintendent will be responsible for the development and implementation of this program. Evaluation This program will be evaluated over a three-year period. Successful accomplishment of the objective will be measured by test scores on standardized tests of the youngsters identified for the program as compared with test scores of youngsters not included in the readiness program. -75-  1 7 1 5. Cost The cost will be determined by the number of teachers employed. It is estimated that more students should receive pre-school instruction than will be able to receive service immediately. The cost per teacher based on 1985-86 figures is about $23,500 per teacher. 1 1 -76- ,.1 T \"4\" PROBLEM NUMBER TWO  \u0026gt; i Opportunities are limited for gifted and talented students to investigate and create beyond the regular classroom. A. B. Proposed Solution After evaluation of the seventeen pilot gifted and talented programs of the Little Rock School District, a gifted and talented program shall be developed in each school by June, 1987. Analysis C. I I There is a need to provide equitable access to programs designed to give comprehensive opportunities for students to extend their educational experiences. Operational Plan 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Objective To establish gifted and talented programs in each Little Rock School District school by spring, 1987. Implementation Strategy a. b. c. d. e. Revise current pilot program consistent with spring, 1986, evaluation. Summer of 1986, staff training Inform principals of training possibilities and state requirements Recruit staff Conduct training Responsibility The Coordinator of gifted and talented programs will be responsible for the implementation of this plan under the direction of the Associate Superintendent. Evaluation The success of this proposal will be determined by observations, evaluations, and surveys. Cost $168,000 -77- T PROBLEM NUMBER THREE I The Little Rock School District is far behind in offering computer programming opportunities. A. Proposed Solution H In order to meet state standards and to strengthen the quality of the mathematics program, a committee for computer implementation should be established immediately to determine the cost and guidelines for computer implementation. B. Analysis rj 1. With PASCAL now being offered as an Advanced Placement, all three school districts in Pulaski County will need to lay the groundwork for this course offering. C. 2. 3. Integration of computers into every applicable phase of the District's K-12 instructional program should be mapped out. With the number of microcomputers continuing to double each year, the following areas require immediate attention: a. b. establishment of a maintenance fund and/or programs to prevent repair costs from limiting programs\nestablishment of a line item in the budget to provide seed money for short-term computer pilots and feasibility studies in a wide variety of K-12 subject matter areas. Operational Plan 1. Objective I ! To form a committee for computer implementation to determine guidelines, pilot expenditures, and expenses for implementing computers into the District's K-12 curriculum. 2. Implementation Strategy Prepare recommendations for implementing the computer curriculum  February, 1986. 3. Responsibility a. Selection of committee members -- The Associate Superintendent, the Math Supervisor, and the Supervisor of Instructional Technology. b. Election of chairman and recorder--Committee Members -78- 1  n J c. Selection of sub-committee -- Committee Chairperson, working under the direction of the Math Supervisor 4. d. e. Schedule meetings Committee Chairperson Write committee report  Committee Chairperson and Recorder Evaluation Successful completion will be determined by the development and submission of the Committee's recommendations. a 5. Cost n 1  I 1'1 Seed money for computer pilots Maintenance program for microcomputers Resource/consultant/travel expenses Total $ 15,000 7,000 2,000 $ 24,000 -79-1 I PROBLEM NUMBER FOUR A tremendous need exists in today's society for youngsters to receive instruction in drug, alcohol, and sex education. A recent cover story in Time states that \"...each year more than a million American II II teenagers will become pregnant... some 30,000 of them under age 15. Arkansas leads the nation in the number of teenage pregnancies, and many of these occur in Pulaski County. Clearly the problem of alcohol and drug abuse and the problem of teenage pregnancy must be addressed more effectively than we have been able to do thus far. A. Proposed Solution The Little Rock School District will provide instruction on drug, alcohol, and sex education in grades 4-9. B. Analysis Ui Efforts to address the problems of drug, alcohol, and sex education through extended day services have not been successful. It is necessary to provide instruction in these areas within the regular curriculum. c. Operational Plan 1. Objective 2. To incorporate instruction in drug, alcohol, and sex education as part of the regular curriculum in grades 4-9. Implementation Strategy A committee of supervisors and teachers will be appointed to recommend appropriate content for programs in drug, alcohol, and sex education for students in grades 4-9. Their recommendations will be received by September, 1986. Teachers will receive inservice training in appropriate methods of instruction in these areas during the first semester of the 1986-87 school year. Program content will be incorporated into the regular curriculum by January, 1987. 3. Responsibility The Committee will make its initial recommendations to the Associate Superintendent in charge of curriculum who will present them to the Superintendent and Board. Curriculum content decisions will be made by the Superintendent and Board. The responsibility for implementation will be that of the Associate Superintendent in charge of curriculum. -80-Lrd 4. Evaluation  III 1 5. I The evaluation of the program will be determined by teachers, principals, students, and parents who are involved with the program. Cost Supplies and printing Inservice training, 1 day 0 $35 for 142 Total $ 2,000 $ 4,970 $ 6,970 I -81- '1* if - PROBLEM NUMBER FIVE  There is a need to ensure that at the junior high and high school levels all students are being required to master the same basic level of knowledge in each subject area taught. Presently, teachers have a heavy burden grading tests. There is a need to give some type of district-wide standardized tests that assures uniformity in teaching and learning without placing an additional burden on the teachers. A. Proposed Solution B. C.  I It is recommended that the District develop a bank of test questions for each of the subject areas taught. These test questions will be stored in the District's mainframe computer. When it is necessary to give quarterly, semester, and year-end tests, such tests could be generated by requesting from the computer a certain number of test questions which are selected from the storage bank. This procedure would allow uniform expectations of teaching and learning. Analysis Although the curriculum that is used in the District is uniform, it is necessary to develop a uniform level of expectation for subject material that is mastered by students. By developing a computerized testing program where tests can be generated from the computer from a \"bank\" of questions, testing for uniform knowledge is possible. It is also possible to develop an answer sheet that can be graded by using scanning procedures. By developing such a procedure, the District can make its expectation level more uniform and aid the teachers in their areas of responsibility. replace essay tests. Operational Plan 1. 2. Objective This system cannot and should not, however. It will be used only for objective tests. To develop a system where the computer can store, select, and print computer tests for all subject areas taught in the District. The objective is to develop a system that will grade the tests. The purpose of developing this system is to make uniform our expectations of students in all subject areas. Implementation Strategy The District will begin this process in the 1986-87 school year by making sure the instructional objectives for each subject area are updated, and the plan for developing the computerization will begin in 1986-87. In 1987-88, it is planned that the areas of English, mathematic, science, and 1 -82- 1 1 iS  social studies at the junior high level will be completed. In the 1988-89 school year, all other courses at the junior high level will be included. During the 1986-87 and 1988-89 school year, the process of writing test questions and including them in the computer will take place for all subjects at the senior high level. It is planned that by the 1989-90 school year, this process can be used for all subjects in grades 7-12. I A 3. Responsibility The responsibility for this effort will be the Associate Superintendent in charge of curriculum and instruction and the Director of Data Processing. F 4. Evaluation 3 The success of this proposal will be determined by whether or not this plan is implemented. h 5. Cost Staff Time  1 I -83- I rI PROBLEM NUMBER SIX For several years, the junior high school has suffered from an identity crisis that remains somewhat unresolved. Some educators believe the junior highs should be abolished and replaced with middle 4 schools. Others believe the existing junior high structure, with a different program, would best meet the needs of early adolescents. There are some indications that young adolescents of today are maturing faster than they used to and that the typical six-three-three grade pattern no longer works well for today's students. Other concerns are that junior high schools too often are simply miniature versions of high school (complete with emphasis on subject matter mastery) with little regard for growth characteristics and special needs of early adolescents. All of these concerns point to the need for reviewing the total junior high program. In addition to these concerns, the Arkansas standards will require that several courses be offered at the seventh and eighth grade levels which are not now required by the Little Rock School District. The present six-period day will make it difficult if not impossible to provide all the required courses, to students. Many electives will be unavailable I A. B. Proposed Solution Appoint a task force to review the total junior high program and make recommendations to the Superintendent regarding curriculum, scheduling, staffing, and extracurricular activities. Analysis J Besides apparent differences that exist between District offerings and state requirements, there are some obvious concerns with the overall effectiveness of the junior high program. Attention needs to be given to such issues as cognitive development of early adolescents, learning styles, physical and social maturation. 11 teacher qualities\" most needed by those who instruct junior high youngsters, appropriate extracurricular I activities, and guidance and counseling needs. The scheduling of classes should be reviewed to determine if a different system of instructional delivery might be more appropriate for the junior highy school. Other issues include the opportunity to develop I learning and study skills under the direction of trained personnel, the opportunity to explore career interests, and the need to establish programs in drug, alcohol, and sex education for junior high youngsters. -84- I I C. Operational Plan 1. Objectives a. To develop a task force to study the junior high program and make recommendations to the Superintendent in the following areas: I 1. 2. 3. 4, Curriculum Scheduling Staffing patterns Extracurricular activities b. f To establish timetables for implementation of program changes prior to June, 1987. I 2. Implementation Strategy a. Select committee members and define role of task force by February, 1986. b. Present committee recommendations to the Superintendent by April 15, 1986. 1 I I I 3. Responsibility The Task Force will present recommendations to the Superintendent. Responsibility for implementation will rest with the Associate Superintendents and the Manager of Support Services. 4. Evaluation Final reports from the Task Force will be evident. Surveys of teachers and students will be used for evaluative purposes. 5. Cost The cost of the Task Force will be minimal. The costs for redesigning the junior high program will be developed in the report of the Task Force to the Superintendent. -85-PROBLEM NUMBER SEVEN Many students in our District would like to have the opportunity to take additional courses beyond what is available to them within a six-period day. Additionally, the new standards will require that new courses be added to the curriculum. Some of these courses will be required. This is a special problem for the junior high program. : 1 A. Proposed Solution Provide an extended school day for junior and senior high school students so that they will be able to take additional courses and thus receive a more comprehensive education than would otherwise be possible. B. Analysis i1 It will be difficult, if not impossible, to offer all the required courses necessary to meet the standards within the current six-period day. While consideration has been given to a seven-period day, such a decision would mean shortening class periods and thus reducing individual teacher-student interaction within a given class. At the same time, many students would like the opportunity to take additional courses beyond those required for graduation. From a cost perspective, it would be difficult if not impossible to employ teachers to teach an additional hour. A method for extension of the school day that is cost effective is needed. 1 C. Operational Plan I 1. Objectives a. b. 2. \u0026gt; To complete a report to the Superintendent and Board by January 1987 containing an analysis of extended day programs and recommendations for implementation. To implement an extended day schedule in the 1987-88 school year. Implementation Strategy A committee of principals, teachers, and central office administrators will study extended day programs and will make recommendations to the Superintendent and Board for the implementation of a cost-effective program by the 1987-88 school year. Principals will assess staffing needs, determine staff reporting and leaving time, and develop a master schedule by April, 1987. needs A -86- J  3. Responsibility 7J1 The initial recommendations will be made by the Committee. Responsibility for implementation will be that of the secondary principals working under the assigned associate superintendent. I 4. Evaluation 1 5. Teachers, students, administrators, and parents will assess the success of the extended day program. Cost Committee expenses (printing and supplies) $ 50.00  w  s -87- '5' II si\n'31 k-\u0026gt;il I a f I  I PROBLEM NUMBER EIGHT I The Little Rock School District needs to continue planning secondary magnet schools. A. B. C. 1 Proposed Solution 1I Planning for a secondary high school for the visual and performing arts should continue. Analysis The magnet schools program of the Little Rock School District has been very well received by students and patrons. The Eighth Circuit Court has directed Little Rock School District and the Pulaski County District to examine magnet options. Operational Plan 1. 2. 3. 4. Objective To design a high school that would develop the potential of students from all cultural and socio-economic backgrounds who exhibit an interest, talent, and ability in the visual and performing arts. Implementation Strategy a. b. c. Determine course, objectives, content, and teaching strategies. Determine what materials, textbooks, and supplies will be needed. Spend the 1986-87 school year developing the with implementation set for 1987-88 school year. Responsibil i ty courses The Associate Superintendent will have major responsibility. The Community Committee which began work in 1984-85 will continue work with the Supervisor of Music and Coordinator of Cultural Arts as resource personnel. Evaluation Evaluation will be consistent with the evaluation that is made of all educational programs in the Little Rock School District. -88r 1 I  H II I I I T 7 5. Cost s The feasibility of funding such a school under a Department of Education grant, State of Arkansas funds, or through combined efforts of the Little Rock School District, Pulaski County, and North Little Rock should be explored. I I I I E -89- I 9 I I PROBLEM NUMBER NINE The District has provided a comprehensive staff development program for its staff members for several years, but it has been unevenly utilized. Some administrators and teachers avail themselves of every possible opportunity to upgrade their skills and learn more about effective educational practices. Others are either reluctant participants or choose not to participate at all. One of the concerns regarding staff development is how to get employees oriented to the philosophy and program of the District while at the same time not adversely impacting on instruction time for 4 students. There are disadvantages to programs which operate only after hours, on the weekends, and during the summer, but clearly, the impact of removing teachers from their duties in the classroom in order to receive inservice instruction training must be carefully assessed. At the same time, if a mediocre teacher's performance can 4 improve as a result of participation in a program during the school day, that too must be considered. During the 1984-85 school year, at least two schools whose teachers were out for seven half-days to participate in PET showed gains in achievement on the SRA test. 4 Another concern has to do with providing training opportunities for administrators and support personnel and for providing school-based staff development programs. Without appropriate leadership from principals, it is unlikely that any lasting change will occur in the instructional practices of teachers. At the same time, unless principals receive the training they need, they can hardly be expected to emerge as instructional leaders of their schools. Further, specially trained teachers have unique needs that are not always appropriately addressed by the District's staff development model. A. B. Proposed Solution Establish a staff development program for all District employees and Board members which will provide systematic training in issues and concerns vital to the District and which will enhance the ability of the identified groups to carry out their responsibilities more effectively. Analysis 1. Effective June 1, 1987, the State Department of Education will require that each district develop and implement a plan for professional staff development and inservice training for school board members, school and district administrators, teachers, and support staff on a continuing and regular basis throughout the year. -90- -I.  1: C. 2. Although the District has recognized the need for staff development as evidenced by the staff development model, scheduling has prevented full and/or effective implementation. Operational Plan rI i J  ( i 1 I 1. Objective To upgrade student performance and achievement by providing systematic inservice training for Little Rock School District School Board members, school and district adminstrators, teachers, and support staff. i I 2. Implementation Strategy a. The Board will adopt a policy concerning staff development. b. A staff development advisory committee will be appointed with a provision for rotating membership. This committee will receive and act upon proposals and recommendations from employees concerning the content of staff development programs. 1 c. A needs assessment will be conducted to determine the areas of interest and concern as perceived by all groups of District employees. I d. Each principal and central office administrator will attain observation status in PET. I e. Annual inservice for principals will be provided, utilizing the Leadership Academy and the Principals Center. f. By February 1 of each year the principal will present to the Associate Superintendent (Curriculum) a building level staff development plan for the year based on local needs assessment data. g. The Associate Superintendents will complete all areas of staff development as set forth in the Little Rock School District Staff Development Model (i.e., PET, Mastery Learning, TESA, and Assertive Discipline). I I h. Annually, staff development in PET, TESA, Classroom Management, and Assertive Discipline will be provided until all schools have completed training in these components. I I i. A Principals Center will be established. I ! -91- i p, I  j. k. 1. The components of the Program for Effective Building Leadership (PEBL) will be implemented. All teachers will have completed PET by 1991-92 and new teachers will be employed on the condition that they take PET. -I' 3. 4. A trainer of trainers cycle will be conducted to assist principals and other employees in the delivery of staff development activities at the local schools, utilizing current and relevant theories of adult development and learning. Responsibility I The Associate Superintendent in charge of curriculum will have primary responsibility for the development and implementation of the staff development program.  \u0026lt;3 ' Evaluation s a. b. c. d. 5. Cost The objective(s) for each inservice or staff development activity must be clearly defined. Each participant will evaluate the inservice as it relates to the stated object!ve(s). The evaluation instrument for personnel will reflect the application of skills and concepts taught in the Little Rock School District Staff Development Model. The number of students working at, above, or below grade level at the end of the first and third nine weeks of the current year will be compared with the same data of the previous year. SRA data will be used to compare growth of students for the current year with the previous year. Five PET Cycles @ $6,000 per cycle Principals Staff Development and Inservice Four Cycles of TESA, Assertive Discipline, and Classroom Management $ 30,000 $ 20,000 TOTAL $ 30,600 $ W76(m 1. L. f -92- I\nII I- 'I I .! I 11 ii J I J 9 'I * PROBLEM NUMBER TEN In order to avoid the emphasis that is being placed on minimum competencies as being an acceptable level of work for all students, it is necessary to try to develop an attitude or atmosphere for learning that accepts the best a student can do as the minimum level of performance. A. B. Proposed Solution In order to try to create an atmosphere for learning and achievement, the District will develop a series of steps to promote learning for the sake of learning without any differentiation through the use of grades. Those steps will be listed below. The District will expand the opportunities for students to learn by developing an academic summer school program. This will be a \"set\" program that will become an automatic part of the summer school offerings each summer. Admission to the classes that are offered will be open to any student who wishes to pursue the subjects that are taught. The District will develop a lecture series. The lecture series will be developed for the purpose of exposing students in the Little Rock School District to some of the nation's politicians, academicians, and newsmakers. The District will consider developing the use of a voluntary scholar's test. The purpose of the test, which will be voluntary, would be to give students the opportunity to know to what degree they have mastered academic material. No differentiation will be made on any diploma. Analysis For the past several years the Little Rock School District has worked hard to improve the basic skills of its students. While the basic skills have improved, the District has not developed an attitude that indicates that learning for the sake of learning is important. The above steps are proposed in order to try and create the idea that not only can all students learn but that developing ones own talent and interests can be done in various ways. The academic summer school is proposed in order to try to expand the opportunities for students to take interesting and challenging classes. The lecture program is proposed in order to give students the opportunity to be exposed to national figures in various areas. The scholars test is proposed in order to try to give students an opportunity to self-evaluate their academic development. -93- 1 i ____3-t C. Operational Plan 1. 2. Objective The objective is to develop and instill an idea of academic performance in the students in each of the buildings in the Little Rock School District. By using these activities, the importance of academics can be emphasized without additional emphasis on grading and acceptance into programs based on prior performance. Implementation Strategy .JH 1! 3. 4. 5. 1 It is proposed that implementation of the proposed plan be completed by the fall of 1986, with the exception of the scholars test. It is anticipated that the scholars test will be available for all students at the end of the 1987-88 school year. Responsibility Responsibility for the program will be shared by the associates superintendents. Evaluation I Evaluation of this program will be measured by the participation in the academic summer school program, attendance at the lecture series, and by the number of students who take the scholar's test. The success of the academic coaches will be measured by an analysis of whether or not that position has had an impact on improved academic participation and performance of the students. Cost Funding for the summer school program will be by tuition. Funding for the lecture series will be sought from private donations. Costs for the tests will be determined later. depending upon what tests are used. -94- II } I i I il Hi I I I rt 5 1 I I I I ,'1 w ' 3 1 ADMINISTRATION 1986-87 -95- II (I i! 4' PROBLEM NUMBER ONE By 1990, the Little Rock School District will have to extend the number of student attendance days from 175 to 179. With the increased cost of utilities, it is necessary for the District to use as many as possible of the \"low energy consumption days\" for student attendance. Recently, the Arkansas General Assembly passed legislation, which was later modified, that emphasized the importance of schools scheduling student attendance days to begin after Labor Day of each year. Temperatures increase significantly after Memorial Day\ntherefore, it is necessary for the Little Rock School District to use as many of the days available between Labor Day and Memorial Day as possible since these are usually lower energy consumption days. A. B. C. Proposed Solution It is recommended that the Board direct the administration to negotiate a change in the manner in which the District has dismissed school for the Arkansas Education Association Convention and to study the alternatives for changing the use of spring vacation during the 1987-88 school year. Analysis ihe District has tried various energy management plans in the past. Some have been more successful than others. The District will again have to become more energy-conscious as a result of the Grand Gulf settlement and anticipated increases in the price of natural gas. This matter is further complicated by the requirement of the new state standards to increase the number of student days from 175 to 179. between Labor Day and Memorial Day. There are a given number of days Unless more days between those two dates are used for student attendance, school days will have to be used either prior to Labor Day or after Memorial Day to a greater degree than they are now used. This not only reduces the effectiveness of teaching because of the heat but also increases utility costs. Operational Plan 1. 2. Objective To better utilize the dates that are available between Labor Day and Memorial Day for student instruction by reducing the days when students are dismissed for other activities. Implementation Strategy To ask the Board of Directors to direct the administration to change the practice of dismissing school two days for the AEA convention. To examine the possibility in future years I' I I i I I E -96- 19 fl of better utilizing the days now used for spring vacation and/or Christmas vacation. 1 3. Responsibility Responsibility for this project will be that of the Superintendent of Schools and those to whom he delegates certain areas of responsibility. 4. Evaluation Successful completion of this proposed solution will be the reduction of utility consumption and by expanding the number of days of student attendance. I. b bl 5. Cost None I 1 -97-9 Bl PROBLEM NUMBER TWO Despite the District's efforts to remediate students who are placed in remedial or \"low\" sections of a subject, too many students are still allowed to remain in a \"lower track.\" A. Proposed Solution I i Beginning in the 1986-87 school year, no student will be promoted beyond the sixth grade who has not been evaluated in a manner that indicates that he/she has the ability to be successful in the seventh grade. I Beginning with the 1987-88 school year, the Little Rock School District will have only two levels of required classes: regular and honors. The classes that are separated because of content level such as Algebra I, Algebra II, or Geometry, will remain. In the 1988-89 school year this requirement will be moved to the eighth grade. I In the 1989-90 school year, it will be moved to the ninth grade and on through the succeeding years until it includes the twelfth grade. p d B. Analysis There is a need to educate all students to a level of competence that enables them to be successful once they get out of high school. Presently, too many students are not required to master a minimal level of knowledge that will enable them to be successful in ensuing years. By phasing out the present levels that place students in different groups, we will ensure that all students have at least a minimal level of knowledge. Remedial programs will need to be developed other than summer school. These remedial programs can only be developed, however, with additional funds. Nonetheless, it is best to set the requirement and the expectations of all students rather than allow the number of students who presently go through school performing at such a low level. C. Operational Plan 1. Objective 1 To ensure that all students achieve a minimum amount of knowledge in a subject. 2. Implementation Strategy 1'! It is recommended that this procedure be phased in in order to prevent any additional hardships to those students who have already reached the junior high level or grades above junior high without having mastered the minimum requirements. Again, remedial programs should be established to help teach students and will be done if money is available. -98-a 1 1 II 3. Responsibility The responsibility for this effort will be that of the two Associate Superintendents. 4. Evaluation I, i I? 5. The success of this proposal will be measured by the elimination of the present grouping patterns and the increase in the number of students who master the minimum skills. Cost None 1 11 1 I 1 I -99-9 PROBLEM NUMBER THREE At the high school level, students are assigned by the computer to certain classes. The computer is not able to anticipate the fact that students have had teachers in previous years and failed the class or identify situations where learning and teaching styles don't match. The computer also is not able to know of personality conflicts between specific students and specific teachers. As a result, there are a i! large number of transfer requests early in each semester. In addition, there are a large number of students who have difficult semesters or difficult years because of the teacher to whom the student was assigned. ' I I I A. Proposed Solution I i ' B. 1 C. It is recommended that at least one of the high schools voluntarily accept on a trial basis the responsibility for developing a system where students are allowed to select their teachers and the period they want to take the particular class. Analysis It is necessary to try to adopt a plan that accommodates students in not only selecting a class, but also selecting the hour in which it is taught and the teacher they would like to have as an instructor. Student-teacher conflicts can be reduced and schedule changes can be substantially reduced. The most common concern that has been expressed about this idea is that students are not able to select teachers for themselves that are in their best interests because they will select the teachers who are the II easiest.\" Principals who have been involved in this type of scheduling, however, indicate that this is not so and are in favor of this process. By trying this on an experimental basis in one of our high schools, we can determine the degree to which it is successful and whether or not it should be continued and expanded to include the other high schools. Operational Plan 1. Objective To develop a scheduling system which allows the students to select not only their subjects but the hours in which the subjects are taught and the teacher that will be teaching the particular classes. I I 2. Implementation Strategy During the 1986-87 school year, high school principals will be questioned about their willingness to volunteer in such a project. After a high school has been selected, the scheduling process will be started for the spring of 1987 and will take effect in the fall of 1988. -100-9 I 3 3 2 3. Responsibility Responsibility for this project will be under the direction of the Associate Superintendent in charge of administration and the principal of the high school that is to participate. 4. Evaluation I I I The success of this project will be determined by the high I school principal. The information in his evaluation would i' '3 4 5. be gathered from students and teachers in his/her building. Cost None I I R I I J 4 I -I I I I -101- I 7 PROBLEM NUMBER FOUR The District does not have a handbook to assist administrators in the interviewing, evaluation, and selection of certified personnel. A. Proposed Solution To develop an interview handbook for the selection of certified personnel. B. Analysis The development of an interview handbook for the selection of certified personnel will provide assistance in the interviewing, evaluating, and selection of certified personnel. The handbook will also provide for some standardization in the selection of teaching personnel when a number of people are involved in the interviewing and selection process. I i I C. Operational Plan 1. Objective I I I To develop a handbook that will provide assistance to administrators as they interview to achieve an assessment of a potential candidate in a short amount of time. 2. Implementation Strategy I a. b. The selection of a committee to assist the Personnel Director in the development of the handbook by May 1, 1986. p Instructional Supervisors and Principals will be trained in the use of the handbook by June, 1986. i I i I h  3. Responsibility The Director of Personnel, under the direction of the proper Associate Superintendent, will be responsible for developing the handbook and its implementation. 4. Evaluation The selection process of certified personnel will be evaluated to determine what impact the handbook has had on the selection of quality certified personnel. Il i( II II li 5. Cost Printing and binding $ 1.000 -102-p.-iT PROBLEM NUMBER FIVE A problem exists in finding an adequate method of preparing first-year teachers to teach in the Little Rock School District.  I' i  S-l Each year the Little Rock School District spends a substantial amount of funds to pay for substitute teachers. During the 1984-85 school year, the District spent in excess of $700,000 for substitute teachers. In addition to the amount of money spent on substitute teachers, the quality of instruction provided by substitutes is substantially below the level of instruction provided by the regular classroom teacher. It is becoming increasingly difficult to attract competent young professionals to the teaching staff and keep classroom teachers in the classroom. A. Proposed Solution To address the problems stated above, it is recommended tht the District institute a \"differentiated staffing\" plan. B. Analysis There is a need to provide training for first year teachers in the Little Rock School District, to provide an available source of competent substitute teachers, and to develop a means of providing a career ladder or some way of keeping professional teachers in the classroom. The differentiated staffing plan would incorporate three basic ingredients, include an entry level group of teachers. The first would These individuals would be employed in the \"training\" part of the program. Although all individuals would be college graduates, they will be assigned to work and be supervised by a \"master teacher.\" They will receive additional training in the areas designated by the District such as the Program for Effective Teaching, etc. and will serve as substitute teachers. II It is hoped that this pool of training\" staff will provide the source from which we will employ regular classroom teachers for the following year. The second level is the level of regular classroom teacher, is the same level that the District presently employs and the responsibilities will be the same. This ihe third level would be called the \"career\" category. After a given number of years of satisfactory performance, a regular classroom teacher would be eligible to be placed at the II level. career\" 1 i! The \"career\" level teachers would not only be placed on a different salary schedule, but they would form the nucleus from which department chairmen, master teachers, and course instructors would be chosen. The individuals at the II career\" level would be eligible for extra work during the summer to work on curriculum and instruction, performance based. All promotions would be -103- 7 C. Operational Plan 1. Objective The objective is to provide the District with a source from which it can draw first-year teachers who are well-prepared to go into the classroom, a reliable source of substitute teachers who are more competent than those from which we draw at the present time, and an incentive plan that will recognize, encourage, and reward career teachers in the Little Rock School District. 2. Implementation Strategy It will not Implementation will begin in the fall of 1986. be possible for us to employ all of the first-year teachers that will be needed in the fall of 1986 and create a pool of \"training\" teachers. We will attempt to begin hiring the \"extra\" staff members and developing a pool. The District will seek grants and other means of trying to establish the training pool. t I During the 1986-87 school year, the District will attempt to develop the complete career ladder process with the appropriate levels and appropriate evaluation instrument being developed. Full implementation is planned for the fall of 1987. I 3. Responsibility r The ultimate responsibility will be under the direction of the Superintendent of Schools with specific parts of the program being assigned to the Associate Superintendents, the Manager of Support Services, and the Director of Personnel. 4. Evaluation I I i The success of this plan will be dependent upon its implementation and the degree to which the quality of instruction from first-year teachers and substitute teachers I is improved. Evaluation of the career ladder element of the plan will be through staff surveys. I 5. Cost I 1 The cost is dependent upon the number of teachers that can be hired at an approximate cost of $15,700 per new teacher, including fringe benefits. I I I 1 I -104-7 PROBLEM NUMBER SIX The need exists within the Little Rock School District to eliminate pre-school registration for students who are attending the same schools as the previous year. It would be the goal of this system to reduce the number of days of registration and the manpower used in filling out registration forms. It will, however, be necessary for students new to the District and new to the school to pre-register. A. Proposed Solution Have only two days of registration. The pupil data forms will be entered into a computer and these students placed on a printout. The school would need to send any changes to the Pupil Accounting Office on a change form. B. Analysis Through computerization of our registration process, the office personnel will be able to plan more efficiently and effectively for the upcoming school year. Also, fewer days will be necessary for registration. i I' C. Operational Plan 1. Objective 2. 3. All children attending the same school in the LRSD will be able to attend school without pre-registering. Implementation Strategy a. b. Utilize one person from Pupil Accounting to feed the information into the computer. Develop a \"change form\" to be fed into the computer for any changes of address, phone number, etc. Responsibility i I b. Pupil Accounting Office The school secretary will be responsible for securing the \"change forms\" and submitting them to Pupil Accounting along with any new pupil data forms. I a. 1 4. Evaluation Registration at the beginning of the school year will r\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_773","title":"P.T.A.","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1991/1998"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","School management and organization","Parents' and teachers' associations"],"dcterms_title":["P.T.A."],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/773"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nI \u0026gt; you are invited to the Little Rock PTA Council Founders Day Luncheon Tuesday February 12, 1991 11:30 AM Asbury United Methodist Church 1700 Napa Valley Drive R Please send reservations by February S\u0026gt; 1991 Sounders 9)ai/ Luncheon David Tutz 13S2S W. iMarkham Little Rock AR 72211 Uh School number oj reservations at (10 each (bjicLVirr LtS'roy amount encfosed .Ilium  iiifc.iiii ml m LR COUNCIL OF PARENTS AND TEACHERS ASSN. 810 W. MARKHAM LI I TLE RO( K, AR 72201 f Non-Profit Organ. U.S. Postage PAID Little Rock, AR 72201 Permit #143 Polly Rainer McClellan High PTA 11411 Kerry Dr. Little Rock, AR 72209 TO : Mr. Stan Strauss Principal, Ish Incentive School FROM: Ms. Sandra Thomas Members Present: President, Ish Incentive School PTA and PTA Members Present on 3/9/93 DATE : March 12, 1993 RE : Concerns of Parents/Patrons At the last PTA meeting, held March 9, 1993, issues and concerns were raised by members present, not only their concerns, but also concerns expressed by many parents not present. The following is a list of these present. 1 . 2 . 3 . concerns. Second Grade Students Formerly Taught by Mr. Ellis Many parents \"passed out\" and there or lack thereof. feel that the second 9-weeks grades were is no Indication of advancement We want a special meeting with you. the appropriate district the new teacher, administrator, parents of these students to discuss the present classroom situation and the grading procedure. Extended Day There is It is concern for what occurs our primarily for understanding that this the extension and the during Extended Day. program of classroom either as a tutorial or for accelerated learning. provides academics, At the December PTA meeting you stated that Extended Day would was being Implemented to foster \"higher level thinking\". writing, However, arithmetic) we want learned children need extension of what we want to take place. the first. basis And (reading, if our classroom learning, that is We want to be assured that the classroom coordinates each child's Extended Day activities. acknowledge and desire leisure children but not in lieu of academics. activities teacher for We our Music Instruction The number of children who are participating in choral music has diminished significantly.4 . 3 . The children are expressing that the music presented is not interesting or relevant to their experiences. Why are these children expected to sing along with recorded music played on a low quality system? Why is there not a musician on staff available for these students? We want a meeting with you. the music teacher, and the appropriate district administrator to discuss this situation. Building Maintenance Restroom facilities for boys and girls were observed during the meeting tl-me, earlier on the meeting date. and numerous other times found to be unsatisfactory during this school and paper towels, flushed clean floors toilets: (especially toilets ( lacking warm after school around year and water, hours), the base soap dispensers environment). obviously over a long (bar soap is not period of of the time), and satisfactory in this The bathrooms were also odorous. want these deficiencies corrected\nDuring the PTA meeting roaches were We observed abundantly around the base of the water fountain in the cafeteria. during spring break. We want this building exterminated Water fountains were found to running continuously. We recommend all fountain sites . not be or to have very low pressure. that cups and dispensers working, be installed at Classrooms are not being cleaned after school ends (trash emptied, bathrooms cleaned, floors mopped and waxed on a routine basis). perform these tasks. haven to situation. only as well. We We have personnel hired to our We children want them want this building regardless 0 f to experience in a warm supportive environment, Campus Facilities There area i s for no playground Pr e-K students. equipment or What forthcoming to alleviate this situation to be their a home learning not but a clean one designated play provisions are as spring will be here shortly and these children will spend more time out of doors? Non-students and non-parents are utilizing during school hours or otherwise loitering on the groundscampus . We want this stopped IMMEDIATELY. We want the grounds properly maintained durln season. this These are some very specific concerns that we have about the overall operation and administration of this institution. As this is an Incentive School, we feel compelled to bring this next item to your attention. as it has been brought to our attention. Dur i ng Mrs . Redwood's Black History program. Mr . Ford, a grasp singing new teacher in this school, was observed choosing not to the hands of the children standing around him during the of \"We Shall Overcome\" and \"Reach Out and Somebody's Hand\" when all other members of the audience Touch did so . We were told that he ultimately \"slipped out\" of the assembly. THIS IS A PROBLEM. Mr . Strauss, we do not want you to feel that the PTA is not proactive. We want you to know that we want this school to the best that is can be and we are willing to help. be However, it has been expressed that if a parent comes to or a problem his/her child may soon come home you with a concern with a Behavior Document. THIS IS A PROBLEM. In keeping with our time day to Inform you that the PTA proactive stance, we want to take this has scheduled a campus clean up for April 3, 1993 from 9a.m. to support in this clean up effort and 4p.m. your We solicit attention to concerns detailed above. March 24, 1993. We anticipate a written response your the by cc : Ms. Janet Bernard Ms . Arma Hart Ms. Gill South Little Rock Community Development Corp.ODM 002/002 Little Rock School District MEDIA ADVISORY August 1,1994 For more information: Dina Teague, 324-2020 Following are some events for news coverage and/or photo opportunities in the Little Rock School District for this week: Monday, August 1, 5:30 - 7:00 p.m Superintendent Henry Williams and the Parent Teacher's Association host a Kickoff for the Little Rock PTA Council and the PTA Presidents. The event is held in the William H. Kennedy, Jr. Auditorium in the Worthen National Bank Building and is sponsored by Worthen and the Capitol Club. Members of the LRSD Board of Directors have been invited to attend. Thursday, August 4, 7:30 - 9:00 a.m. The Greater Little Rock Chamber of Commerce hosts the annual Tri-District Partners in Education Breakfast. The Event is held at the Main Event at 2602 Cantrell Road. Members of the LRSD Board of Directors have been invited to attend. 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 78201  (301)324-2000COBB LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT C ! I B Romine Interdistrict School Theme: Computer Science and Basic Skills 3400 Romine Road Phone 228-3086 Little Rock, Arkansas 72204 February 4, 1994 - SENT BY FAX - TO: ODM Monitoring Team FROM: Lionel Ward, Principal SUBJECT: Requested Information Please find enclosed the information requested: 1993-94 PTA TOTAL MHSBERSHIP BY RACE AND GENDER RACE/GENDER t X white male 35  111 black male 62 .198 other male 1 .003 white female 65 .207 black female 142 .453 other female 8 .025 TOTAL 313 .997 If I can be of any further help, please contact me. LW/lw Poi'kCs to tr 1  i (t i J Little Rock School District News Release February 13, 1995 For more information\nDina Teague, .324-2020 Ifte Little Rock Karent teacher .^Haxiation (FFA) CouncU celebrates 98 years of service to children and families at the 1995 Founders Pay Luncheon on Friday, Februart 17 at 11:30 a m. in the j.A Gilbreath Conference Center at Baptist Medical f ! I-If ( enter. J ickets are $15.00 at the door, and reservabom may be made by calling Becky Rather at (50i) 324-2272, or Carla Bobo at (501) 224 6746. Dr. Katherine Mitchell, President of Shorter College and member of the 1 title Rock School District Board of Directors, is the keynote speaker. Other highlights of the celebration include the announcement of the Educator of the 'iear Av/ard and the winners of the national PTA elections. Founders Day is observ'ed annually by the PTA Council to honor its founders and review past achievements, to inform members and the community about the FTA, and to encourage contributions to expand and strengthen the PTA. it CO/eO'd T  01/1 1X7/3di \u0026lt;K****/\u0026gt;*^ 0:i?l '36. LT *rT'QQOOnn-i  ZSA1\\al nAAA 20-V\u0026lt;r-T0S-:: xej SZ!l,'vyj3$ lacydiTS QS^n zsAi\\Q\u0026lt;iM nnnA \u0026lt; !  T jaEiacaBi as \u0026gt; \" LRSD SUPPORT SERUICES Pax:1-501-324-2032 f Feb 20 95 10:34 P. 02/06 Little Rock School District -a i Media Advtsorv I! February 20,1995 For more information\nDina Teague, 324-2020 Following is a list of events for announcements, news coverage and/or photo opportunities in the Little Rock School District for thi.s v-eek: Monday, February 20, 7:45 -10:30 a.m. I'he student council of Parkview Arts and Sciences'Magnet High School hosts a Past President's Breakfast in the Gilbreath Center at Baptist Hospital. Students have the opportunity to meet former Parkview student council presidents such as Dr. Sandra Bruce Nichols, Director of the State Health Department, and other role models. Tuesday, February 21,10:00 - IT.OO a.in. Reverend Hezekiah Stewart, Executive Director of the Watershed Project, speaks to students of McClellan Business/ Communications Magnet High School at their Black History Month/Multicultural .Assembly-. fuesday, February 21,1:00 - 2:00 p.m. The Jubilee tRorus presents a vocal program on Black History to students at Rightsell Career Awarenes-s and Mass Media Elementary School. r-h- Tuesday, February' 21, 7:00 - 8:00 p.m. Students in the Gifted Program at Watson Elementary School host an International Bazaar and Chinese Ribbon Dance to showcase what they have learned in their muticultural studies. Wednesday, February 22, 5:00 p.m. The LRSD Board of Directors holds a special meeting to review business cases and to consider their effects on the 1995-96 budget. Thursday, February 23, 8:30 - 9:45 a.ni. In observance of Black History Month, Patrick Oliver presents a lecture on famous black ^American and African artists for students at Woodruff Elementary School. '^inore) I ! i ii! ,1 II k SIO West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkiasas 72301  (501)8242000 RBoi jt*  mao . ..yC / LRSD SUPPORT SERVICES Fax:1-501-324-2032 Feb 20 95 10:35 P. 03/06 LRSD Events Februar}- 20 24 Page Iwo of tliree I.humday, February' 23, 1:00 -2.00 p.m. Ihe Philander Smith College I'frama Department performs for students at Wakefield Elementary School in celebration of Black History Month. ihursday, Februar monthly meeting. Lur rhe LRSD Board of Directors hold their regular Friday, February 24.8:15 a.m ,- 2:35 p.m. Elizabeth Ellis promotes student awareness of muiticultiural folk tales as she visits groups of students at Terry Elementary School. .Ms, Ellis is a well knoum storyteller and is endorsed bv the American Library Journal. Friday, Febry^ 24 8:30 - 10:(X) a.m. Students at Gibbs Foreign Languages/ International Studies Magnet Elementary School host SIKUKLU, a musical history of black music. Special \"guests\" will be ^ott lopHn, The Supremes, and a Dixieland Jazz baiid Friday, February 24, 9.QP a.m. - 3:00 p.m. Parkview Arts and Sciences Magnet High School hosts a blood drive for the ?\\merican Red Cross. Student demonstrate their commitment to the community as they provide needed donations to the Red Cross. Friday, February 24, 9:30 IQ.'OQ a.m. \u0026amp; 2:00 - 2:30 p.fn. Meadowcliff Elementary School celebrates Black History Month with performances of dramatic .skits about the lives of notable black Americans, lite school choir will perform freedom songs and spirituals.  -.A Ead.aix.Febru.ary 2-4/1:00- 2:30 p.m. Pulaski Heights Elementary School presents \"We /Are the World,\" a multicultural celebration. The event begins with a parade of classes cany'ing flags from around the world. Each grade level will present information about the culture they have studied to the other students tn the school. Friday, February 24,1 V.OO a.m. - 1:00 p.m. McDermott Elementary Schoo! hosts Grandparents Day. Grandparents will join students in the cafeteria for lunch and will participate in Book Fair Week activities (see below). CONTINUING EVBNTS Monday, F_ebraajy\\2Q, through Friday, February 24, 8:30 a.m. - 2:30 p.m. Brady Elementary School students show achievement and enthusiasm for learning as they display their entries in a school-wide science fair. Judging is at 8:,30 a.m, on Wednesday, and award.s are presented at 9:00 a.m. on Friday. Contact: Tami Vardaman, 228-3065 (more)  *'LRSD SUPPORT SERVICES Fax:1-501-324-2032 rebruan' 20,1995 I i Feb 20 '95 10:36 Lirrix Rock School District News Release For more information: Dina Teague, 324-2020 P.05/06 rhe Little Rock PTA Council celebrated 99 years of service to children and tamilies at the 1995 Founders Day Luncheon on Friday, Febmart' 17. Approximately 250 teacf^ers, parents, students, and district admirustrators gathered in the Gilbreath Conference Center at Baptist Hospital to honor PI A founders and to recognize outstanding achievements. Irish Williams, a teacher at Fulbright Elementary\nand Lillie Carter, Principal at Pulaski Heigl.!, Elementary School, were named co-winners of the Educator of the Year Awarti Ashley Carradine, a student at Carver Basic Skills/Math - Science Magnet Elementary School was recognized os a finalist in the National Reflections Art Contest. Dr. Katherine Mitchell, President of Shorter College, former President of the PT A Coundt and member of the Little Rock School District Board of Directors presented the keynote address entitled \"We Must do More,\" Mitchell 810 Weet Markham Street  i (more) .liUff Little Rock. -ArkRnsas 7!S201  (501)3StV!i000 LRSD SLPPORT SERVICES Fax:1-501-324-2032 Feb 20 95 10:37 P. 06/06 s I-TA Founders Day February 19,1995 Page two of tuo acknou ledged the contnbutions of EI A members and reaffirmed that parental involvement is the kev to successful schools. She then encouraged the audience to work even harder to persuade more parents to become involved in the ETA. The next targets for recruitment are businesses, churches and community groups since their support of parents and schools is vital to reaching the goals of the ETA. Mitchell further suggested that parents use part of their vacation leave during the school year in order to spend valuable time in their children's schools. She  ? s_ concluded by reminding the audience that all of our children need all of us and, in time, we will depend on all of them. Debbie Glasgow, El'A Council President, presented several membership drive awards to .schools which had shown increases or 100% participation in their individual PTAs. Beverly Jones also recognized all nominees for the Educator of . -M the Year Award with a cerbheate. Students from Southwest Junior High School assisted ivith .serving the lunch. Entertainment was provided by students from Horace Mann Arts and Saences Magnet Junior High School, and Western Hills Elementary School. fe''*'- h',., I* I. A?!.\nS'  1owl SiDxcik IPTA Cfflsmcnll RECEIVED FEB 2 4 1995 February 20.1995 Olfice of Desegregation Monitoring Dear Dr. Williams and Little Rock School District Board of Directors: The Little Rock PTA Council is gravely concerned about the administrations proposed budget cuts pertaining to the school nurses. The decision to eliminate 19 registered nurses is quite shocking in view of the 1994-95 Little Rock School Board Priorities compiled just last September, 1994, in which Quality Nursing Services ranked third highest in priority. The PTA Council feels that the level and quality of nursing health care and services received by ail students would be greatly diminished under this proposal and in the area schools would be virtually non-existent. Although it appears that most magnet and incentive schools would retain their school nurse positions, in reality these nurses probably would frequently be pulled to work at other schools that have no nurses. Consequently, the PTA Council feels that, ultimately, our schools are at risk of losing the professional health care and services currently rendered to our children by the school registered nurses. The PTA Council is also extremely concerned about possible future plans to consider replacing the RNs (registered nurses) with LPNs (licensed practical nurses) and/or health aides. The knowledge and skills base of a registered nurse is significantly more appropriate in the school based setting in comparison to a licensed practical nurse. Neither an LPN nor a health aide possesses the specialized skills, judgment or knowledge necessary in providing the types of nursing care and services needed in our schools for our children. No parent wants his child to suffer the consequences or risks of mismanaged care given by inadequately trained personnel. During the process of identifying student health needs and intervening however necessary to meet those needs, school nurses provide innumerable types of professional services. In many cases, registered nurses are the only persons legally authorized under state public health regulations to complete the myriad of referral and evaluation forms for students needing special services. Consequently, the PTA Council feels that replacing RNs with LPNs and/or health aides would be comparable, theoretically, to replacing our classroom teachers with instructional aides. Many parents are greatly concerned about the continued assurance of basic nursing services received daily by their children such as administering medications and making pertinent observations, giving specific medical treatments, providing mental health observation and intervention, and providing observation and care for acute and chronic health conditions, such as diabetes, asthma, and head or other traumatic injuries. Every student has the right to a physically safe and emotionally secure environment in our schools, but will this right be severely compromised or. at worst, denied under this proposal? It must be noted that children in the lower socio-economic strata of our student population will undoubtedly stand to suffer greatly under this plan, because the school nurse is their only source of medical care for their health needs. The number of children in this category ranges from 100 to 150 per day. Currently, there are 1260 students in the LRSD served each day for acute illnesses and injuries, and over 1200 individual doses of medication are given daily. School nurses serve an extremely important function as health educators and advocates. As positive role models in developing permanent healthy lifestyles, they promote good health habits and illness prevention, carry out many health education programs, and work closely with students, parents and teachers regarding special health needs. Oftentimes the school nurse is the first and foremost person in whom a student will confide concerning personal problems and needs. Therefore, the nurses play a key role in providing support and intervention and handling the daily crises that arise. Therefore, the PTA Council strongly holds that in order for students to function at their highest learning ability and to have a successful educational experience, they must have access to the health services and education necessary to promote optimal levels of wellness. The PTA Council firmly takes the stand for maintaining health services as they are presently delivered and preserving the school nurse positions that we currently have. Thirty schools are covered daily with nurses while twenty schools are not covered\ntherefore, it would appear that the LRSD should consider adding school nurse positions rather than eliminating them. We also feel strongly that budget cuts should be made further away from the children, because school nurses directly serve 100% of the students in our district. At the last PTA Council meeting the members voted to make known to the LRSD Administration and the School Board of Directors our position on the proposed budget cuts affecting school nurses. Attached is a list of those members in attendance and the schools they represent. These individuals represent more than 13,000 PTA members in the LRSD. At a time when we are striving for safe schools. this situation certainly acquires a chilling perspective if we are to lose our school nurses and. as parents, suddenly feel that our children are truly in an unsafe environment. The Little Rock PTA Council sincerely hopes that you will give strong consideration to our viewpoints regarding this issue and will not make any changes in the current school nurse program in the proposed budget cuts. Sincerely,\nUJ Dfeb^e Glasgow, President Barbara Mills and Debbie Velez, Council Representatives Little Rock PTA Council cc: Honorable Judge Susan Webber Wright Ann Brown, ODM LRSD Administrators Gwen Efird and School Nurses PTA PresidentsName 73 T Little Rock PTA Council DATE: School/PTA Office Home Address/Phone ^'(VAV^k) S^'acnS____ VvU  V\\a2) CL\u0026lt;^ro| Q 'Dgc^ m\nkc 0'0^^ -r C' A A 9cS z\u0026gt;Q n , c\n(.k^VaASAi3 WAV /kJM toen^ I A. ( A ' A ________L.r2 A/f- SiiS^S'/C, b (^ fi.- -13^1 L \u0026lt;Name Little Rock PTA Council DATE: IDJ^^5' School/PTA Office LAXS^rrn AA\\ \\Uy Pri /\\r') Home Address/Phone 72??? CR, f 7/0/\u0026gt; 0'0\u0026lt;^ L- 'T Lu.^k2/(r ^'' i ' f C^k kAkdaCk ') 1-^ '.6 i^\\r T (3i( /^lC\u0026gt; /Gd ck C2) I I.1 [Ai.- ^02./ /y/AAi^'^''-' I /j 5 7^ -^Cij xf 't doc/zieU 3- \"!^:)0'5 /UcCk[l 0~^i/\\ a k-76 / (10 PK \u0026lt;k\u0026lt;y6cy~yi cT,o \u0026gt;t)ur.ou vu\u0026gt;*iiiui i XI X uno ri3t 01/02 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 For Immediate Release April 26, 2004 For more information: Scott Morgan, 447-6902 State PTA Meeting Set NORTH LITTLE ROCK (AR) - Parents, teachers, students, administrators and friends of the State PTA (Parent-Teacher Association) are set to gather by the river in downtown North Little Rock for the 19^ annual Arkansas State PTA Convention April 30 and May 1 at the Wyndham Riverfront Hotel. The national slogan for PTA, which is 107 years old and the largest childrens advocacy organization in the world, is Every child. One voice. Delegates from around the state will attend workshops, hear from prominent Speakers, discuss recent legislation and expand their network of schools searching forknowledge on how to make the educational system in Arkansas work successfully for all students. The Governors Mansion will be the site for the pre-convention Tea at 3:00 p.m. on Thursday, April 29. All registered delegates will visit the mansion for refreshments. Delegates are asked to bring a childrens book with them which will be given to Arkansas First Lady Janet Huckabee. She will distribute the books to Arkansas schools that are in need of library books. State PTA President Kathy McFetridge of Springdale will officially open the 79 Annual State Convention at 9:00 Fnday morning, April 30. Opening day festivities include North Pulaski High School ROTC presentation of the colors, followed by the National Anthem sung by Tawanna Campbell of Little Rocks Martin Luther King Elementary School. Special guests include North Little Rock Mayor PatnekHays, National PTA President-elect Anna Weselak, Regional Director of the U.S. Department of Education Dr. Gaye Lang and Joy Rockenbach of the Arkansas Health Advisory Committee. National PTA President Linda Hodge could not attend, but sent this message\nAs PTA members, s we are very fortunate to have state and national PTA conventions. They provide us with wonderful opportunities to learn from one another as we share stories of the amazing and successful efforts that have been under way in our communities. This gathering is a time for you to reenergize and inspire each other as you strengthen your commitment and ability to make a difference for all children. On Friday and Saturday the delegates will attend a variety of workshops. Some will cover national and state topics such as No Child Left Behind ... Parents Rights and Responsibilities\nLegislation: Arkansas rwot 0^/02 Arkansas PTA Convention Page 2 of2 Parental Involvement Act 603\nand Building Successful Partnerships...National PTA Is Parent and Community CW wpics .nclud. p,c\u0026lt;i.u,rs\nusing Kchology .0 help child succeed\n,d raismgpositivc, confidentand caringyouth. Many sessionswill address PTA leadership training. Fun workshops are also included. Diane Vibhakar of the Arkansas School Boards Association will demonstrate how to build trust between schools and home with Study Circles. North Little Rock PTA Council will host a Make-N-Take\" workshop with glue, scissors, paint, etc., as participants leant how to say thank you to special individuals back home. National PTA workshop Dogs for Dads\" will teach schools how to get dads, grandpas, uncles, preachers, and other positive male role models involved with their schools. Another component of the convention is the celebration of accomplishments in 2003-04. The National PTAis an advocate of the arts in all schools. The Reflections program honors outstanding students in the areas of music, literature, photography and art. This years state awards will be presented by U.S. Senator Blanche Lincoln at a noon luncheon on Friday, April 30. Sponsors of the luncheon are Radiology of Arkansas and Arvest Bank of Central Arkansas, and the luncheon is hosted by the North Little Rock PTA Council. Friday will be topped off with the Stete PTA Awards Banquet at 7:00 p.m. Schools, PTA units and individuals will be honored. Arkansas PTAs Teacher of the Year Michele Hutton of Springdale and Adnunis- traior of the Year John Bacon of Little Rocks Dunbar Middle School will be introduced. Other awards include Parental Involvement\nHealth \u0026amp; Safety\nCommunications\nBoard ofDistinction\nChampion ofChil- dren\nand Outstanding Councils. Four scholarships will be presented to a parent, a certified teacher and two high school seniors. All scholarship recipients must be working or plan to work on educational degrees. The awards banquet is hosted by the Little Rock PTA Council. The convention will wrap up on Saturday, May 1, with the Membership Awards Luncheon at noon which IS sponsored by the Pulaski County PTA Council. Charters will be presented to new PTA units throughout the state, and outstanding membership schoolswill also be honored. Throughout the convention delegates will be kept busy. The PTA Boutique will offer the latest m PTA jewelry and promotional items. The Exhibit Hall will enable vendors from Arkansas and surrounding states to display their products and services. Information on fundraising items, playground equipment, safety equipment for schools, insurance and other services will be available. A Hospitality Room will help delegates make it through the three-day convention, as will the annual Silent Auction. ###'Welcome KiKsaaiistia SMB, LI'TTDE KOC'K.'PdA. COU(fICIl^ dOWlpE'RS (DAy 12,1991 irrfVi'r DeBBie Velez President Ldi^DTA Council lunch Tresentatum of Awards Life iMemhersfiip Award Introduction of Special Quests Ulistory of the L'K^A Council Introduction of Speaker Speaker (DeBbie Velez dipsie Dunham (Past (President 1967-68 Lssie 9diddleton Arl^gnsas State VTA ^MemBership Chairperson iMemBersBip Awards Special Council Awards ^marll\ns Coats for  Dougd^rde (Honorary (\\demBership Chairman Arliansas State (PTA Announcements Closing Dechy d(ather 1990 Life ddemBership Award (Ppcipient Linda Kussenherger DeBBie Velez dlr. diuth S. Steele L'S^D Superintendent Carla 'BoBo DeBBie Velez KI I aJJ I Special Thanks Special music during lunch was provided by the Central High School Orchestra, directed by Tom McDonald. Lunch was served by the Pulaski Heights Junior High Junior National Honor Society. Hostesses: Essie Middleton Joyce Perry Becky Rather Sue Roland Dudda Sanders Grace Stanley The Council would especially like to thank Glynda Tarpley^ Betty Ruth Davis and their Founders Day Committee for making this day a special occasion. 1 1 II A I 'If' k\" LrrruL J{ocK_ 12,, 1991 Asbury United^detbodist Cburcb WBWgI Wednesday, September 11. 1991.. .Gazette Ot'-ii LR parents claim teacher threatened students over PTA membership By Cary Bradburn Gazette Staff [Three Western Hills Elementary Jchool parents said Tuesday a eacher threatened to punish their ixth-grade children if they didn t oin the Parent Teacher Associa-ion. . Colleen Pritz, the teacher, said CT1M ft. IIMinilP J Monogramn a 821*2106/VUJaA K (behind ChUl'a) 10' OTii FUN \u0026amp; UNIQUE GIFTS Monogramming Atailable la^ at Ploaaant Valley 10770000 RBxoxdlnneeyy Parham If f----------- MP*- she did not threaten the children and thought she had settled the issue after speaking to one of the parents about it Tuesday after school. Margie Puckett, the principal, said none of the parents complained to her and that Pritz told her Tuesday afternoon the matter seemed to be resolved. But Joni Felkins and Gayla Mathis, two of the parents, said nothing has been resolved. They said they would meet with Puckett and Pritz today and go to the school board with their attorney if necessary. Four of Fritzs students said -ar Tuesday night that the teacher assigned as homework the task of enrolling their parents in the PTA and bringing the $2 annual membership back to school today. She said if you dont bring the money back, dont come back to school, said Patches Hedemark, 11, a student in the class and Felkins daughter. I did assign it as homework, Pritz said. I didnt threaten them with punishment. I would never t-   JLftW ajigsai^ r : I' threaten a student. I would never put my job on the line. The students said Pritz threat-' ened to take away recess and write their names on the board if they didnt bring the membership' money. And for each additional day, they would get a checkmark by their name, the students said. Patches said two checkmarks prompts a parent-teacher conference and a third one leads to the long form, or a behavior notice. TH* T r .-.H, \u0026lt; nFMDCRAT-GAZETTE  WEDNESDAY, JUNE 3.1992  PTA urges parents schools to interact Scripps Howard News Service The national Parent . Teacher Association on Tues-, day called for more parentschool interaction to improve education. Its ideas for getting parents more involved in schools:  Principals and teachers should visit parents homes and set up brown bag lunch meetings at work sites.  School buildings should  open earlier and close later to accommodate students and\nparents.  Schools should invite par- ents to curriculum workshops that explain what they're doing and why and offer classes for adults on the ABCs of raising children. The national PTA said these suggestion.s came out of a workshop it held in Wisconsin in April for education advocates and business and civil rights leaders. PTA President Pat Henpf told a news conference in Washington Tuesday that inad- . equate financing of education has resulted in mixed messages and a very confused group of parents out there. But she said schools can do a lot to improve the situation by taking simple steps to get parents more interested and involved in what their children do in class. I do not see the parent involvement effort taking a lot of financial resources as much as ' deep-seated commitment to make it happen, she said. Keith Geiger, president ol the National Education Association, the nations largest teachers union, said Tuesday needed but more support for schools is. The kind of support and involvement Im talking about isnt necessarily financial, he said. Lillian Brinkley, president of the National Association ol Elementary School Principals and principal at the Willard Model School in Norfolk, Va., said Tuesday social and economic realities make the parent-teacher partnership essential. Never, during my 30 years as an educator, has there been a more urgent need for families and schools to help each other, she said. Kent Allison, vice president at Scholastic Inc., a major texb book publisher, said the business community understands that the growth of technology now requires a keenly educated workforce. He called for the federal government to provide money for every child eligible for Head Start and other early intervention programs that improve a childs chances for success. complete overhaul of the public school system is not aOUR CHILDREN ARE THE WORLD What: LR PTA Founders Day Luncheon When: February 11,1997 Where: Pulaski Heights United Methodist Christian Life Center at Woodlawn and Monroe Streets Time: 11:30a.m. to 1:00p.m. Cost: $ 10 per person before Jan. 31 $ 15 per -^person at the door Send payment to: Cathy Drilling, Treasurer 226 Markwood Little Rock, AR 72205 Tickets will be sent through the school mail. Little Rock PTA Council 501 Sherman Street Little Rock, AR 72202 c C a i '-p\\ -.5 t\" A  ysA'SOc iZI I JAN 2 2 1997 Off ICE OF OEStGREGATOHWlTOWHS Largest % Membership Increase Jr. High - Mabclvalejr, High Elementary - Western Hills Elementary Little Red Schoolhouse Award - 100% Staff Parkview Magnet High Fair High Hall High McClellan Magnet High Dunbar Magnet Jr. High Forest Heights Jr. High Mabetvale Jr. High Mabctvale Elementary Pulaski Heights Elementary Terry Elementary Geyer Springs Elementary Williams Magnet Elementary King Magnet Interdistrict Elem. 100% Membership iia/i . 'iJt , Rightsell Academy Baseline Elementary Horace Mann Magnet Carver Magnet Elem. Forest Park Elementary Fulbright Elementary Ciarland Elementary McDermott Elementary Western Hills Elementary Watson Elementary Komine Elementary Jefferson Elementary Meadowcliff Elementary Welcome Carver Magnet Elementary Mcl\u0026gt;ermott Elementary Terry Elementary Williams Magnet Elementary Fulbright Elementary Pulaski Heights Elementary Western Hills Elementary Schools With 10% or More Increase Founders Day Luncheon Little Rock PTA Council February 10, 1998 Pulaski Heights Methodist Church Thought For The Day Introduction Of Entertainment Entertainment Introduction of Special Guest and Past Presidents Introduction of Guest Speaker Guest Speaker Doris Williams, President Selma Chandler Doris Williams Horace Mann Choral Ensemble- Carolyn Forman Director Doris Williams Jeannie Price, 1st. VP. Dr. Sandra Nichols Director - Arkansas Depart, of Health Presentation of Awards Forest Heights Jr. High Mabclvalejr. High Frrrcst Park Elementary Garland Elementary Mitchell Elementary Rockefeller Elementary Terry Elementary Pulaski Heights Jr. High Cloverdale Elementary Fulbright Elementary McDermott Elementary Rightscll Academy Romine Elementary Western Hills Elementary Membership Awards Life Membership Award Educator of the Year Award Rhonda Burton Vai Henry I '.r , -. I Karen Greenlee, 3rd. V.P. Dr. Les Gamine. Supt. Doris Williams, President .JI *FIRST 100% PTA UNIT REPORTING* Announcements I  Rlghtscll Academy - September 10, 1998 Presentation of Door Prizes Ixa Russt^The Little Rock PTA Council would like to thank the following schools, people and organizations for the assistance provided for this event. TOGETHER EVERYONE ACHIEVES\" Richard Davis Photography Pulaski Heights Jr. High Servers Horace Mann Choral Ensemble Carolyn Forman - Director Shamrock, Inc. (Innishrook) Cherrydalc Farms Kathryn Beich Entertainment Betty Raper Stu Trent Nancy Ware Founders Day {Committee Chairman Rhonda Burton would like to thank her committee: Lea Russ, Cathy Drilling, Connie Brown, Brenda Casey, Patti Hamilton, Doris Williams and all the PTA Presidents who took the time help us. Thanks! Special Thanks to all the local PTA units who donated the door prizes! blTTEE ROCK PTA GOUNGlb FOUNDERS DAY bUNGHEON FEBRUARY 10,1908 PUbASKI HEIGHTS UNITED METHODIST GHURGH 11\nSO -1:00 i-: :: 'K \nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_793","title":"Purchasing","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1991"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Finance","Educational planning"],"dcterms_title":["Purchasing"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/793"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nRECEIVED JUL 1 Office of Desegregation Monitoring DATE: June 24, 1991 TO: Board of Directors THROUGH: Dr. Ruth S. Steele, Superintendent of Schools (JZI FROM: SUBJECT: /VChip Jones, Manager of Support Services [^Charlie Neal, Director of Purchasing Corrected Copy of Purchasing Policy Attached is a corrected copy of the purchasing policy to replace that submitted for first reading on June 19, 1991. The substantive changes are: a. Section 1-101\nRewritten. b. Section 1-108\nLast sentence added to clarify useage of singular and plural words. c. Section 1-108 (13)\nAdded subsection (o) to exempt commodities purchased for resale. d. Section 2-105\nLast line should have read, \"involved or when special knowledge or skills are needed.\"BOARD OF DIRECTORS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROCUREMENT POLICY SECTION GENERAL PROVISIONS Purpose: The primary purposes of this policy are\nTo simplify, clarify and update the policy governing procurement by the District. To permit the continued development of procurement regulations and procedures. To provide for increased public confidence in the procedures followed in the District's procurement activities. To ensure the fair and equitable treatment of all persons who deal with the procurement system of this school district. To provide increased economy in District procurement activities by fostering effective competition. To provide safeguards for the maintenance of a procurement system of quality and integrity. 1-101 General Principles of Applicable Law\nThe Little Rock School Districts Procurement Policy shall be governed by the applicable laws of the State of Arkansas. 1-102 Obligation of Good Faith\nAll parties involved in the negotiation, performance, or administration of procurement transactions or contracts are required to act in good faith. tl Good faith II means honesty in fact in the conduct or transaction concerned and the observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing. 1-103 Application\n1 The policy shall apply to every expenditure of District funds or funds controlled by the District, regardless of their source, including state and federal assistance monies, under any contract or procurement action for commodities or contractual services. District commodities. It shall also apply to the disposal of Nothing in this policy or in regulations promulgated hereunder shall prevent the District from complying with the terms and conditions of any grant, gift, bequest, or cooperative agreement.Little Rock School District Procurement Policy Page 2 1-104 Severability\nIf any provision of this policy or any application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions of application of this policy which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, coid to this end the provisions of this policy are declared to be severable. 1-105 Current Policies Repealed\nThe following policies are rescinded and replaced by provisions contained herein\nEPS CODE DJ EPS CODE DJA EPS CODE DJC EPS CODE DJF EPS CODE DJG EPS CODE EDA EPS CODE GBI TITLE: TITLE: TITLE: TITLE: TITLE: TITLE: TITLE: PURCHASING PURCHASING AUTHORITY BIDDING REQUIREMENTS PURCHASING PROCEDURES VENDOR RELATIONS RECEIVING AND WAREHOUSING STAFF GIFTS AND SOLICITATIONS 1-106 Current Policies Amended: The following policies, or all other policies or parts of policies containing provisions which may be in conflict or inconsistent herewith, are hereby amended and the application of this policy shall prevail. EPS CODE KHA EPS CODE DI EPS CODE DIA EPS CODE DK TITLE: TITLE\nTITLE: TITLE: GIFTS TO THE SCHOOLS FISCAL ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING INTRA SCHOOL FUNDS DISBURSEMENTS 1-107 Determinations\nWritten determinations and findings required by this policy shall be retained in the appropriate official contract file of the Purchasing office for a period of five (5) years. 1-108 Definitions\nThe following words shall have the meanings as defined whenever they appear in this policy or associated implementing regulations or contracts, unless: (a) the context in which they are used clearly requires a different meaning, or (b) a different definition is prescribed for a particular policy provision or regulation. Also, unless the context requires otherwise, words in the singular include the plural, and those in the plural include the singular.Little Rock School District Procurement Policy Page 3 (1) Business means any corporation, partnership, individual, sole proprietorship, joint stock company, joint venture, or any other private legal entity. (2) Commodities means all supplies, goods, materials. equipment, machinery, facilities, personal property and services to include personal and professional. (3) Construction means the process of building. altering, repairing, improving, or demolishing any public structure or building, or other public improvement of any kind to any public real property. It does not include the routine operation, repair, or maintenance of existing structures, buildings, or real property. (4) Contract means all types of District agreements. regardless of what they may be called, for the procurement or disposal of commodities, services, or construction. Collective bargaining agreements between the District and its employees are excluded from coverage under this policy. (5) Contract Modification means any written alteration in specification, delivery point, rate of delivery, period of performance, price, quantity, or other provision of any contract accomplished by mutual action of the parties to the contract. (6) governmental body. Contractor means any person having a contract with a (7) Cooperative purchasing means procurement conducted by or on behalf of more than one public procurement unit. (8) or characteristic. Data means recorded information, regardless of form (9) Designee means a duly authorized representative of a person holding a superior position. (10) Debarment means the disqualification of a person or business to receive invitations for bids, requests for proposals, requests for quotes, or the award of a contract by the District for a specified period of time commensurate with the seriousness of the offense, the failure, or the inadequacy of performance. (11) Employee means an individual drawing a salary from a governmental body, whether elected or not. (12) Excess commodities means commodities having a remaining useful life but which are no longer required by the using organization in possession of the commodities.Little Rock School District Procurement Policy Page 4 (13) Exempt commodities and services means those categories of commodities and services that are exempt from competitive bidding. The categories are\n(a) Advertising in electronic and print media, periodicals and related publications. (b) Fees, including medical and physician fees. (c) Freight and storage charges and demurrage. (d) Licenses. (e) (f) Maintenance on office machines and technical equipment. Membership in professional, trade, and other similar associations. (g) Postage. (h) Taxes. (i) Services of visiting speakers, lecturers, and performing artists. (j) Travel expense items, such as room and board and transportation charges, (k) Utility services or equipment which is defined, recognized, and regulated by the Arkansas Public Service Commission as a monopoly offering. (1) Professional and consultant services except as may be provided elsewhere in this policy. (m) Published books, manuals, maps, periodicals, films, tapes, diskettes, technical pamphlets, copyrighted material, informational and educational resource material, and other educational program support material when appropriately designated. (n) Items, components, or parts that would be compatible or otherwise cause incompatibility when used with or added to an existing set or system. (o) Commodities procured for resale in bookstores, canteens, gift shops and other similar operations. However, commodities procured under this definition shall not be shared, sold or transferred as a method of circumventing policy or regulation.Little Roc)c School District Procurement Policy Page 5 (14) Grant means the furnishing of assistance, public or private, whether financial or otherwise, to any person to support a program authorized by the Board of Directors. (15) May denotes the permissive. (16) Person means any business, individual, union. committee, club, other organization, or group of individuals. (17) Procurement means buying, purchasing, renting. leasing, or otherwise acquiring any commodities, services, or construction. It also includes all functions that pertain to the obtaining of any commodity, service, or construction, including description of requirements, selection and solicitation of sources, preparation and award of contracts, and all phases of contract administration. Procurement Official or Purchasing Official means (18) the person duly authorized to enter into and administer contracts and ma)te written determinations with respect The term also includes an authorized representative thereto. acting within the limits of authority. (19) Regulation means the administrative instructions developed to interpret and define applicable policy, and to prescribe the requirements, procedures, and practices necessary to implement that policy. (20) Services means the furnishing of labor, time, or effort by a contractor, not involving the delivery of a specific end product other than reports which are merely incidental to the required performance. This term includes professional and personal services but does not include employment agreements or collective bargaining agreements. (21) Shall means the imperative. (22) State Contract means a contract for the procurement of commodities or services awarded and administered by the State of Arlcansas. (23) Surplus commodities means any commodities no longer having any use to the District. This includes obsolete commodities, scrap materials, and nonexpendable supplies and equipment that have completed their useful life cycle.Little Rock School District Procurement Policy Page 6 (2U) Siis pens ion means the disqualification of a person or business to receive invitations for bids, requests for proposals, requests for quotes, or the award of a contract by the District for a temporary period pending the completion of an investigation, or during any legal proceedings that may ensue because a person is suspected upon probable cause of engaging in criminal, fraudulent or improper conduct, or failure or inadequacy of perfoiroance which may lead to debarment.Little Rock School District Procurement Policy Page 7 SECTION 2 - AUTHORITY AND DUTIES OF THE PROCUREMENT OFFICE 2-101 Designated Purchasing and Contracting Official: The designated legal purchasing agent for the Little Rock School District is the Director of Purchasing. This appointment is in accordance with Title 6, Chapter 21, Subchapter 3 of the Arkansas Code of 1987 Annotated. 2-102 Purchasing Director's Authority: Except as otherwise expressly provided in this policy, the authority of the Purchasing Director encompasses procurement of all commodities, services, and construction on behalf of the Little Rock School District, regardless of the source of funding. 2-103 Responsibilities of the Purchasing Director: The Director of Purchasing is the primary responsible official and shall possess the express authority and jurisdiction in matters pertaining to: (1) The procurement and supervision of procurement of all comnodities, services, and construction needed by the District. (2) The supervision, management and control over all inventories of commodities belonging to the District, regardless of the method or source of acquisition. (3) The management and supervision of the distribution, disposition, disposal and inventory control procedures of the District's fixed assets (personal property). (4) Management responsibility for the operation of the District's Central Supply Center and such warehouses and storerooms as may be established for the storage and distribution of materials and supplies. (5) The selection, qualification and disqualification of vendors, suppliers, and contractors. (6) Establishment, management and control of programs for the development of specifications, quality standards, inspection, testing and acceptance of commodities and services. (7) Recommendations to the Superintendent and the Board of Directors on policies pertaining to procurement functions of the Little Rock School District.Little Rock School District Procurement Policy Page 8 (8) The promulgation, dissemination, and enforcement of rules, regulations, and procedures related to procurement, materials management and construction, as long as these are not inconsistent with applicable federal, state, or Little Rock School District Board statutes or policies. 2-104 Authority to Delegate\nThe Director of Purchasing shall have the authority to delegate certain procurement functions and responsibilities as required to enhance effectiveness and economy, and convene such committees or advisory councils as may be necessary to accomplish procurement activities. The Director shall retain oversight and general management authority in instances where purchasing activities have been delegated. 2-105 Coordination: The Director of Purchasing shall coordinate with user schools and departments as needed in the development of reciuirements and specifications. Users will provide specifications when technical or nonstandard factors are involved or when special knowledge or skills are needed. 2-106 Unauthorized Purchases: Except as provided herein, it shall be unlawful for any District official or employee to order or initiate purchase of any commodities, services, or construction, or make any contract or agreement within the provisions of this policy other than through the Purchasing Department, and the District shall not be obligated for any purchase or contract made contrary to these provisions. 2-107 Procurement Violations: The Director of Purchasing shall have investigative responsibility involving alleged violations and make recommendations to the Superintendent in those instances of actual violations of procurement statutes as prescribed by Act 724 of 1991, the \"Local Fiscal Management Responsibility Act.\"DATE: June 19, 1991 TO: Board of Directors FROM: SUBJECT: Dr. Ruth S. Steele, Superintendent of Schools Purchasing Policy for First Reading The attached policy presents the first and most important sections of the new purchasing policy, which will consist of a total of 10 sections when finished. The remaining sections will be completed for the July Agenda meeting. Although the procedures have been in place, the development of the formal governing policies to replace the rather ambiguous and confusing 1981 policies have evolved slowly due decision-making level. to several changes in administrators at the As part of the overall policy review, and because of current personnel turnover, we are making a major effort to complete this rather complex change prior to the start of the coming school year. The overall concept is to replace several random policies with one comprehensive document that reaffirms the authority and responsibility assigned to the central purchasing office, while realigning the manner in wiiich the policy and the implementing regulations are presented to conform to the format of the procurement code model developed by the American Bar Association. Converting the District purchasing to a system patterned after the Model Procurement Code (MPC) has been an objective of the District for a long time. This process was first presented to the Board in February of 1989. (See enclosed transmittal memorandum dated February 13, 1989) Also enclosed is a brief introduction to the MPC, which will give you an idea of what is involved. The entire document will consist of 10 sections. The Model Procurement Code contains 12 articles, but for our purposes all appropriate provisions can be combined into 10 sub-headings or sections. The first two are key in that they establish the authority and the level- of responsibility which will prevail throughout the full procurement process. The provisions covered have been carefully cross-referenced against all current federal and state laws and regulations to ensure conformity. Enclosed also are copies of selected laws and policies that should assist you in your review. I recommend that you approve for first reading the enclosed new initial policy. BOARD OF DIRECTORS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROCUREMENT POLICY SECTION GENERAL PROVISIONS Purpose: The primary purposes of this policy are: To simplify, clarify and update the policy governing procurement by the District. To permit the continued development of procurement regulations and procedures. To provide for increased public confidence in the procedures followed in the District's procurement activities. To insure the fair and equitable treatment of all persons who deal with the procurement system of this school district. activitie To provide increased economy in District procurement by fostering effective competition. To provide safeguards for the maintenance of a procurement system of quality and integrity. 1-101 Supplementary General Principles of Law Applicable\nUnless displaced by the particular provisions of this policy, the principles of law and equity, including the applicable statutes of the State of Arkansas, and law relative to capacity to contract, agency, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, or bankruptcy shall supplement the provisions of this policy. 1-102 Obligation of Good Faith: All parties involved in the negotiation, performance, or administration of procurement transactions or contracts are required to act in good faith. \"Good faith means honesty in fact in the conduct or transaction concerned and the observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing. 1-103 Application: 1 The policy shall apply to every expenditure of District funds or funds controlled by the District, regardless of their source, including state and federal assistance monies, by this District under any contract or procurement action for commodities or contractual services. the disposal of District commodities. It shall also apply to Nothing in this policy or in regulations promulgated hereunder shall prevent the District from complying with the terms and conditions of any grant, gift, bequest, or cooperative agreement.Little Rock School District Procurement Policy Page 2 1-104 Severability: If any provision of this policy or any application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions of application of this policy which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this policy are declared to be severable. 1-105 Cixrrent Policies Repealed: The following policies are rescinded and replaced by provisions contained herein: EPS CODE DJ EPS CODE DJA EPS CODE DJC EPS CODE DJF EPS CODE DJG EPS CODE EDA EPS CODE GBI TITLE: TITLE: TITLE: TITLE: TITLE: TITLE: TITLE: PURCHASING PURCHASING AUTHORITY BIDDING REQUIREMENTS PURCHASING PROCEDURES VENDOR RELATIONS RECEIVING AND WAREHOUSING STAFF GIFTS AND SOLICITATIONS 1-106 Current Policies Amended: The following policies, or all other policies or parts of policies containing provisions which may be in conflict or inconsistent herewith are hereby amended and the application of this policy shall prevail. EPS CODE KHA EPS CODE DI EPS CODE DIA EPS CODE DK TITLE: TITLE: TITLE: TITLE: GIFTS TO THE SCHOOLS FISCAL ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING INTRA SCHOOL FUNDS DISBURSEMENTS 1-107 Determinations: Written determinations and findings required by this policy shall be retained in the appropriate official contract file of the Department of Purchasing for a period of five (5) years. 1-108 Definitions: The following words shall have the meanings as defined whenever they appear in this policy or associated implementing regulations or contracts, unless: (a) the context in which they are used clearly requires a different meaning, or (b) a different definition is prescribed for a particular policy provision or regulation.Little Rock School District Procurement Policy Page 3 (1) Business means any corporation, partnership, individual, sole proprietorship, joint stock company, venture, or any other private legal entity. joint (2) Commodities means all supplies, goods, materials. equipment, machinery, facilities, personal property services to include personal and professional. .nd (3) Construction means the process of building. altering, repairing, improving, or demolishing any public structure or building, or other public improvements of any kind to any public real property. It does not include the routine operation, repair, or maintenance of existing structures, buildings, or real property. (4) Contract means all types of District agreements. regardless of what they may be called, for the procurement or disposal of commodities, services, or construction. Collective bargaining agreements between the District and its employees are excluded from coverage under this policy. Contract Modification ( 5 ) means any written alteration in specifications, delivery point, rate of delivery, period of performance, price, quantity, or other provisions of any contract accomplished by mutual action of the parties to the contract. (6) governmental body. Contractor means any person having a contract with a (7 ) Cooperative purchasing means procurement conducted by, or on behalf of more than one public procurement unit. (8) or characteristic. Data means recorded information, regardless of form { 9 ) Designee means a duly authorized representative of a person holding a superior position. (10) Debarment means the disqualification of a person or business to receive invitations for bids or requests for proposals or requests for quotes or the award of a contract by the District for a specified period of time commensurate with the seriousness of the offense, of the failure, or the inadequacy of performance. (11) Employee means an individual drawing a salary from a governmental body, whether elected or not. Excess commodities means supplies having a remaining (12) useful life but which are no longer required by the using organization in possession of the supplies.Little Rock School District Procurement Policy Page 4 (13) Exempt commodities and services means those categories of commodities and services that are exempt from competitive bidding. These categories are: (a) Advertising in electronic and print media, periodicals and related publications. (b) Fees, including medical fees and physician fees. (c) Freight and storage charges and demurrage. (d) Licenses. (e) Maintenance on office machines and technical equipment. (f) Membership in professional, trade, and other similar associations. (g) Postage. (h) Taxes. (i) Services of visiting speakers, lecturers, and performing artists, Travel expense items, such as room and board and transportation charges. (k) Utility services or equipment which is defined, recognized, and regulated by the Arkansas Public Service Commission as a monopoly offering. (1) Professional and consultant services except as may be provided elsewhere in this policy. (m) Published books, manuals, maps, periodicals, films, tapes, diskettes, technical pamphlets, copyrighted material, informational and educational resource material, and other educational program support material when appropriately designated. (n) Items, components, or parts that would otherwise be compatible or cause incompatibility when used with or added to an existing set or system. (j )Little Rock School District Procurement Policy Page 5 ( 14) Grant means the furnishing of assistance, public or private, whether financial or otherwise, to any person to support a program authorized by the Board of Directors. It does not include an award whose primary purpose is to procure an end product, whether in the form of supplies, services. or construction\na contract resulting from uch an award is not a grant but a procurement contract. (15) May denotes the permissive. (16) Person means any business, individual, union, committee, club, other organization, or group of individuals. (17) leasing, Procurement means buying, purchasing, renting. construction. or otherwise acquiring any commodities, services, or It also includes all functions that pertain to the obtaining of any commodity, service, or construction, including description of requirements, selection and solicitation of sources, preparation and award of contract, and all phases of contract administration. (18 ) Procurement official or purchasing official means the person duly authorized to enter into and administer contracts and make written determinations with respect thereto. The term also includes an authorized representative acting within the limits of authority. (19) Regulation means the administrative instructions developed to interpret and define applicable policy, and prescribe the requirements, procedures, and practices necessary to implement that policy. (20) Services means the furnishing of labor, time, or effort by a contractor, not involving the delivery of a specific end product other than reports, which are merely incidental to the required performance. This term includes professional and personal services, but does not include employment agreements or collective bargaining agreements. ( 21) Shall means the imperative. ( 22 ) State Contract means a contract for the procurement of commodities or services awarded and administered by the State of Arkansas. ( 23 ) Surplus commodities means any commodities no longer having any use to the District. This includes obsolete supplies, scrap materials, and nonexpendable supplies and equipment that have completed their useful life cycle.Little Rock School District Procurement Policy Page 6 (24) Suspension means the disqualification of a person or business to receive invitations for bids or requests for proposals or requests for quote the or the award of a contract by District, for a temporary period pending the completion of an investigation, or during any legal proceedings that may ensue because a person is suspected upon probable cause of engaging in criminal, fraudulent. or improper conduct or failure or inadequacy of performance which may lead to debarment.Little Rock School District Procurement Policy Page 7 SECTION 2 AUTHORITY AND DUTIES OF THE PROCUREMENT OFFICE 2-101 Designated Purchasing and Contracting Official: The designated legal purchasing agent for the Little Rock School District is the Director of Purchasing, This appointment is in accordance with Title 6, Chapter 21, Subchapter 3 of the Arkansas Code of 1987 Annotated. 2-102 Purchasing Director's Authority: Except as otherwise expressly provided in this policy, the authority of the Purchasing Director encompasses procurement of all commodities, services, and construction on behalf of the Little Rock School District, regardless of the source of funding. 2-103 Responsibilities of the Purchasing Director: The Director of Purchasing is the primary responsible official and shall possess the express authority and jurisdiction in matters pertaining to: (1) The procurement and supervision of procurement of all commodities, by the District, services, and construction needed (2) The supervision, management and control over all inventories of commodities belonging to the District, regardless of the method or source of acquisition. (3) The management and supervision of the distribution, disposition, disposal and inventory control procedures of the District's fixed assets (personal property). (4) Management responsibility for the operation of the District's Central Supply Center and such warehouses and storerooms as may be established for the storage and distribution of materials and supplies. (5) The selection, qualification and disqualification of vendors, suppliers, and contractors. (6) Establishment, management and control of programs for the development of specifications, quality standards, inspection, testing and acceptance of commodities and services. (7 ) Recommendations to the Superintendent and the Board of Directors, on policies pertaining to procurement functions of the Little Rock School District.Little Rock School District Procurement Policy Page 8 ( 8 ) The promulgation, dissemination, and enforcement of rules, regulations, and procedures related to procurement, materials management and construction, as long as these are not inconsistent with applicable federal, state, or Little Rock School District Soard statutes or policies. 2-104 Authority to Delegate: The Director of Purchasing shall have the authority to delegate certain procurement functions and responsibilities as required to enhance effectiveness and economy, and convene such committees or advisory councils as may be necessary to accomplish procurement activities. The Director shall retain oversight and general management authority in instances where purchasing activities have been delegated. 2-105 Coordination: The Director of Purchasing shall coordinate with using schools and departments as needed in the development of requirements and specifications. Users will provide specifications when technical or non-standard factors are involved or a less special knowledge or skills are needed. 2-106 Unauthorized Purchases: Except as provided herein, it shall be unlawful for any District official or employee to order or initiate purchase of any commodities, services, or construction, or make any contract or agreement within the provisions of this policy other than through the Purchasing Department, and the District shall not be obligated for any purchase or contract made contrary to these provisions. 2-107 Procurement Violations: The Director of Purchasing shall have investigative responsibility involving alleged violations and make recommendations to the Superintendent in those instances of actual violations of procurement statutes as prescribed by Act 724 of 1991, the Local Fiscal Management Responsibility Act. IILITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS I February 13, 1989 TO: Board of Direct 3 FROM: Dr. Ernest f. Associate Superintende Charles Neal, Director of Purchasing ident /f' or Business Administration THROUGH: SUBJECT: Dr. George D. Cannon, Superintendent of Schools Report on Bid Requirements and Purchasing Procedures Attached are copies of purchasing and bidding procedures currently in practice. The format follows that which was developed during the 1983-84 effort to publish the Administrative Procedures Manual. The Purchasing Department is presently working on a project to rewrite and consolidate the functions and responsibilities of the Purchasing Department along with the rules, regulations. and procedures associated with those functions. The product will be a procedures manual patterned after the Model Procurement Code for State and Local Governments. This is a major rewrittlng task but the results will be a more comprehensive procurement procedures manual. We're projecting completion in August.laaa ,1 nil 0 /fcf BASIC: PUBLIC PURCHASING \u0026amp; MATERIALS MANAGEMENT Most of these Acts are covered in FM 74-7, Attachment _______ , 0  All purchasers must be fully aware of and comply with these laws. MODEL PURCHASING CODES AND ORDINANCES The laws under which public purchasing must operate vary from state to state as within each state. well as among municipal entities These variations can and do create confusion for vendors and, in some cases, may not provide or the best purchasing practices. Many laws and ordinances are not specific as to the responsibility for the purchasing I but speak only to some of the legal requirements. practices, es. The National Institute of Municipal Law Officers \u0026lt;NIMLO) and the American Bar Association (ABA) have attempted to structure model purchasing ordinances. Both, organizations have agreed that centralization of purchasing authority is far superior to fragmented authority xa xar superior to iragmented authority, and that the installation of sound purchasing methods, including centraliza- tion, will result in savings to the municipalities. NIMLO Ordinance. , _ ______________ This model purchasing ordinance National Institute of Municipal Law Officers in cooperation with the National Institute of Governmental Pi^chasing to assist any states or municipalities in their adoption of a centralized purchasing policy ordinance. or -^A Code. The American Bar Association is now coordinating the development of a model procurement code for state and local governments. The Association has worked extensively with NIGP and the National Association of State Pj^chasing Officials (NASPO). They have also worked with the National Purchasing Institute (NPI), as well as with the private sector, including the National Association of Purchasing Management (NAPM). The suggested code is still in workingpaper form, but when completed it should provide for unifomnity among public purchasing jurisdictions, just as the Uniform Commercial Code has provided the business world with uniformity. is governments. They have also worked with as well as with The suggested code is still J The proposed Code is intended to provide statutory controls and appropriate limitations of a fundamental nature public. The Code will contain only necessary details so as to establish a practical structure which motes good purchasing practices. to protect the public. 16 statutory - pro- The new Code should permit \"I I 2 8 8 1 1 '1 -4 1 JINTRODUCTION This Model Procurement Ordinance for Local Governments is designed to provide a small unit of local goverrunent with (1) policy guidance and statutory language for managing and controlling its procurement of supplies, services, and construction for public purposes, (2) guidance for 1 itracts, and (3) 2 set iC CO! tile administrative arid judicial resolution of controversies relating to of ethical standards governing public cind private participants in the procurement process. The Model Procurement Ordinance is essentially a condensation of the ABA Model Procurement Code I for State and Local Governments, tailored for consideration and use by smaller units of local government. The Model Procurement Ordinance was drafted by the American Bar Association Coordinating Committee on a Model Procurement Code for State and Local Governments, a joint committee of the ABA Section of Public Contract Law and the ABA Section of Urban, State, and Local Government Law. The Ordinance was developed by the Coordinating Committee with the active cooperation and financial support of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). To help ensure that the Model Procurement Ordinance would be practical for use by small local jurisdictions, the Coordinating Committee established a Purchasing Officials Review Group whose members were appointed by the National Institute of Governmental Purchasing (NIGP), a key member of the Coordinating Committee's Advisory Board. NIGP, and many of its members, had actively participated in the drafting and review of the ABA Model Procurement Code for State and Local Governments and the Code's Recommended Regulations. f- Procurement Under Federal Assistance and Certification I Attachment O to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-102 (Uniform Ad- ministrative Requirements for Grants-In-Aid to States and Local Governments\nProcurement Standards) sets forth procurement standards that govern public purchases made by states and local governments using most federzil assistance funds. The Model Procurement Ordinance is designed to provide a small local government with a sound, workable, and consolidated public purchasing idards. Although the Ordinance was developed with the system that meets those federal assistance of EPA, it is also aa^ \u0026gt;le to procurements made using federal funds awarded under grants or cooperative agreements from other federal agencies. Pursuant to Attachment O, many of the major federal grantor agencies have established programs for the certification of the procurement systems used by their state and local government grantees. Since the Model Procurement Ordinance was designed to meet Attachment O standards, it should be an especially helphJ tool to those units of local government that choose to participate in such procurement system certification programs. Drafting Concepts The ABA Model Procurement Code for State and Local Governments has proven readily useful to a jurisdiction with a large procurement responsibility and a substantial procurement organization available to manage the public purchasing function. It could be readily adapted for use by most states, major cities, large urban counties, and other large public entities. The Code's adaptation for use by smaller public bodies, however, proved to require substantial modification. To meet this challenge, the Coordinating Committee undertook the drafting of the Model Procurement Ordinance for Local Governments. The Ordinance is tailored to the more limited procurement responsibilities and limited administrative resources available to most local governments. At the same time, the fundamental principles of good procurement and ethical standards set forth in the Code have been retained, but appear in a \"streamlined\" form. The Ordinance is designed for consideration by small cities and counties, towns, townships, and other small public bodies exercising a public purchasing responsibility. viiAN OVERVIEW OF THE ORDINANCE General Provisions Article 1 states the general purposes of the Ordiriance, and contains definitions of terms used in the Ordirumce.  1 Office of the Purchasing Agent Article 2 suggests the basic organizational structure for managing and conducting public purchasing on a centralized basis. At the same time, the Article gives clear recognition to the benefits of specific delegations of appropriate authority to other professionals available within the local government. Source Selection and Contract Formation Article 3 establishes competitive sealed bidding as the preferred method of contracting, but also authorizes the use of other source selection methods in appropriate, specified situations. The other source selection methods are competitive sealed proposals, a competitive selection procedure for designated types of professional services, simplified procedures for making small purchases, and strict requirements relating to sole source procurements and emergency procurements. The Article states the requirements for contracting by each method. Contracts not awarded by competitive sealed bidding generally require a written justification, which becomes a matter of public record. The Article also provides for cancellation of solicitations, the correction or withdrawal of bids, and the cancellation of awards. The Article provides for determinations relating to the responsibility of prospective contractors, and provides authority to require bid and performance bonds. It also requires the submission of cost or pricing data, and conducting of a price analysis or a cost analysis, for contracts awarded without adequate price competition and for contract price adjustments. The Article authorizes the use of the type of contract most appropriate to the procurement, although it retains a preference for fixed-price contracts and prohibits cost-plus-a-percentage-of-cost contracts. It also permits, and regulates, the use of both multi-year contracts and the technique of multiple source contracting. Finally, Article 3 also specifies requirements for effective contract administration, and for the reporting of anticompetitive practices. 5 1 ! ! I ! I 5 I I I ! Specifications Article 4 requires that specifications be written in a manner that maximizes competition. In particular, it regulates the use of brand name specifications to encourage competition. Procurement of Construction, Architect-Engineer and Land Surveying Services Article 5 covers special aspects of coristruction procurement, including the selection of the appropriate method of construction management, and the use of bid, performance and payment bonds. It also provides a procediue for the competitive award of contracts for architect-engineer and land surveying services in lieu of techniques provided in Article 3. Debarment or Suspension Article 6 contains procedures for making debarment or suspension determinations. 'i it ix I I rI' i I' The Model Procurement Ordinance, like the ABA Model Procurement Code from which it is derived, was developed as a ' mode!' rather than a \"uniform\" legislative proposal in recognition of the substanKal differences among local governments in terms of both governmental orgrini: hon and legal authority to prescribe their own procurement systems. Therefore, the focus of the Model Procurement Ordinance is on the policies and procedures necessary for a modem and cost-effective public purchasing system that is fair and open to public scrutiny. 'The Cnordinating Committee ere courages thoughtful modification to meet local needs, but calls to the attention of those responsible for adapting the Model Procurement Ordinance the process through which its recommendations were developed. Drafting and Review Process The Model Procurement Ordinance for Local Governments was developed during a drafting and review process that spanned more th^ two years. In addition, the Ordinance, as a condensation of the ABA Model Procurement Code for State and Local Governments, had the benefit of the five years of effort that went into drafting the Code and its Recommended Regulations. The initial draft of the proposed Model Procurement Ordinance was prepared by the ABA Model Procurement Code Project staff, under the general guidance of the Coordinating Committee on a Model Procurement Code. Working with Project volunteers and EPA's Task Force on the Model Procurement Ordinance, the proposed Ordinance was refined during the preparation of three internal review drafts. Following a line-by-line review of the last internal review draft, undertaken in conjunction with the EPA Task Force, the Coordinating Committee issued a Public Review Draft of the proposed Model Procurement Ordinance in August of 1981. Almost 3,000 copies of the Public Review Draft were circulated. Comments were actively solicited until the close of the comment period in March of 1982. The Purchasing Officials Review Group and the Coordinating Committee then conducted a line-by-line review of the Public Review Draft in light of the comments received. Following further discussion, a Coordinating Committee's Final Draft was presented to the governing Councils of the cosponsoring ABA Sections in May 1982. Following Council review over the next several months, final approval action on the text of the Model Procurement Ordinance was taken in August during the 1982 Annual Meeting of the American Bar Association. I I I 8 i Drafting Mechanics Commentary has been occasionally inserted to explain the purpose of a particular provision, to provide further amplification of its meaning, or to demonstrate its application in the context of a particular procurement situation. In addition. Commentary may indicate where adjustments may be needed to make a particular provision conform to existing law or regulations. The Ordinance also includes several 'Editorial Notes,\" which provide addibonal assistance to those adapting the Ordinance for use by a particular jurisdiction. Experience indicates that most jurisdictions will not include the Commentary or the Editorial Notes in their ordinances. Bracketed material [ ) indicates matters needing particular attention during the drafting of an ordinance based on the Model Procurement Ordinance. Brackets enclosing a blank require the insertion of language appropriate to that jurisdiction for such things as dollar and time limitations, position descriptions, or references to ^lecific state laws. Suggested language in brackets indicates that the jurisdiction may want to make changes in light of its own experience and circumstances, or because other local requirements may be applicable. Two bracketed phrases appearing side by side usually indicate that one should be inserted and the other deleted. I' viiir' I Cost Principles fl I. Article 7 has been rcscr/cd. Should an enacting jurisdiction wish to iriclude in its ordinarice a comprehensive set of contract cost principles, the text of Chapter 7, Cost Principles, of the Recommended Regulations to the ABA Model fh-ocurement Code for State and Local Governments may be considered. Supply Management Article 8 has been reserved. Should an enacting jurisdiction wish to include in its ordinance the coverage of such topics as quality control, inventory management, excess property transfer, and the disposition of surplus property, the text of Chapter 8, Supply Management, of the Recommended Regulations to the ABA Model Procurement Code for State and Local Governments may be considered. 5 Appeals and Remedies 1 Article 9 suggests mechanisms for the resolution of disputes arising from the solicitation and award of procurement contracts, bid protests, and contract performance claims. In addition, this Article provides procedures for handling contracts awarded in violation of law. ! Cooperative Purchasing I ! Article 10 has been reserved. Cooperative purchasing and joint-use arrangements among units of local government or with the state have proved to be cost-effective management tools. However, given the broad array of potential users of the Model Fh-ocurement Ordinance, and the various state law limitations on their authority to enter into such intergovernmental agreements, it was not possible to address effectively this important subject. Should an enacting jurisdiction be able to include in its ordinance coverage of agreements for cooperative purchasing and the joint use of equipment, faciEties and personnel, it may consider Article 10, Intergovernmental Relations, of the ABA Model Procurement Code for State and Local Governments and Chapter 10 of the Code's Recommended Regulations. i I i Assistance to Small and Disadvantaged Businesses Article 11 has been reserved. Provisions to assist small and disadvantaged businesses, and other socio-economic programs implemented through the procurement process, could be inserted in this Article by the enacting jurisdiction. Ethics in Public Contracting Artide 12 contains ethical standards with accompanying sanctions that are appbcable to all participants in the pubEc procurement process. The proposed ethical standards cover conflicts of interest, gratuities and kickbacks, contingent fees, and misuse of confidential information. I'i APPENDIX The Appendix sets forth provisions which address the various socioeconomic and other federal public policy goals implemented through Attachment O (Procurement Standards) to OMB Circular A-102 (Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants-in-Aid to States and Local Governments). They have been included with the Model Procurement Ordinance as a convenience for any enacting jurisdiction that wants its pubEc purchasing system to address aU the current requirements of Attachment O. They do not constitute the recommendations of the American Bar Association, or of any of its Sections or Committees. XStjlv o (\" 74 th General Assembly HGl OJO UI iJUd Hegiil.ir Session. 1933 1 \"AN ACT TO REQUIRE THE SOLICITING OF BIDS Ir-\"E^ COIIMODITV TO BE 2 PURCHASED BY A SCHOOL DISTRICT zHAS^l^TIgASgJ^PURCtttSESP^ 3 ^7j,T(^f^tH0USAin)\nDOLLARS..ORlM^^^^ AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. 4 b 6 BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSSIBLY OF THE STATE OF ARKiVNSAS: 7 SECTION 1. Definition. (A) \"Purchasing Official' shall mean the yv. '.'ifcV'. I 29 30 8 9 10 1 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Board of Directors of any school district or a of the school district lawfully designated agent with authority to contract or behalf of the school district. (B) Commodities make purchases on shall mean all supplies, goods, material. ment, machinery, facilities, personal property equip- , and services, other than personal and professional services, purchased for school district. (C) :ioq^3i3 \"Purchase Price shall mean or on behalf of the the full sale or bid price of without any allowance for trade-in. Purchase shall mean and include not of a commodity but also the acquisition only the outright purchase of commodities agreements or lease-purchase agreements or any o whereby the school district has an option the rental payments on the pu (E) under rentar-purchase ther type of agreements to buy the rchase price thereof. \"Open Market Purchases by any purchasing official in SECTION 2. shall mean commodity and to apply those purchases of commoditVes which competitive All purchases bidding is not required of commodities by any school district. except those speclflc.lly exempted by Section 3, shell be made as folic' (A) ImeecK. instenccln which .he.esU.eted.:POPoh,Tp.tlc.hvn oc.exceed.two-thousan4e\u0026lt;ldUe\u0026gt;t= th,e=ood_le\u0026gt;, shell-.be ptocered y except those spccifica soliciCi n^Tds\\ provided that the and may purchase the commodity by negotiating a official may reject all bi\u0026lt;l contract. If the AS SNCROSSCD J/15/81 H.D. 190 1 2 J 4 0 8 9 10 1 I 12 13 14 15 2216 17 18 purchasing official, after rejecting all bids, determines that the purchase shou!-i be mude bij ne j-at lat i'jn then each raspons ible bidder \u0026gt;/ho s-ab.nitte bid shall be notified cf the determination and shall be rjiaen a port uni t \u0026lt;j to rx-^gotiate. f 1-.) Open ilarkei less chan cwo the. (C) Purcli.-isen nay Ik- matle wbev? -anii doll.iis ($2,000). No purciiasin.c\nf. ffiei.al shall p.irccl. or C:  iniic':in!\nc price is n D1 i t witii the intent or purpose to enable the purcha.se restrictive procedure. SECTION 3. to be in.Jde u er a less The hereinafter ii.sted commodities may be purchased without soliciting bids: and unavoidable emergency. (A) Commodities in instances of an unforeseen Provided, that no such emergency purchase shall be approved by the superintendent, unless a statement at cached co Che in writ ?. shall be purchase order describinp. the er.-crgency purcha.s.e of such cot (B) Commnuic (C) n.acess tatinu t n e I I r .otity without competitive bidding. s available onlv from the feder.al government' Ocilicy services, Ji'\n- by.  state '26 21 '22 23 24 25 6 27 28 29 30 31 che. races lor which re subject co reguiaiion e-.'.cy or a federal regulatory agency.' (D) lise.d '.nt and ~ac.hinere. 1 I I i I I SECTION 4.,The board of Directors of each school district shall p.c-- scribe che method oi soliciting bids by regulation and may adopt other rules and regulations governing the procurement of co.mmodiCies. SECTION 5. A violation of the provisions of this Act shall be a Class C misdemeanor. SECTION 6. hereby repealed. Ail laws and parts of laws in conflict with this Act ar 3? 32 33APPROVED V nGnOvVFERRNN.OTRR /s/ Dobby Tullis -7- i. State of Arkansas 75th General Assembly Regular Session, 1985 A Bill HOUSE BILL 725 By: Representative Doramus For An Act To Be Entitled 1 2 \"AN ACT TO AMEND SECTION 3 OF ACT 639 OF 1983 [ARK. STATS. 80-553] TO PERMIT SCHOOL DISTRICTS TO MAKE PURCHASES OF COM-available only from a single source without solicit7 3 9 ation OF BIDS\nAND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.\" BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS: SECTION 1. Section 3 of Act 639 of 1983, the same being Section 80-553 of the Arkansas Statutes, is hereby amended to read as follows: 10 \"Section 3. The hereinafter listed commodities may be purchased without 1 1 12 soliciting bids: (A) Commodities in instances of an unforeseen and unavoidable emergency. n 1 13 Provided, that no such emergency purchase shall be approved by the superlnten- 14 15 15 17 16 dent, unless a statement in writing shall be attached to the purchase order describing the emergency necessitating the purchase of such commodity without competitive bidding. (B) Commodities available only from the federal government. (C) Utility services, the rates for which are subject by regulation by 19 state agency or a federal regulatory agency. (D) Used equipment and machinery. ^Z^E) Commodities available only from a single source. Provided, that the 23 24 purchasing official determines in writing that it is not practicable to us\u0026amp; other than the required or designated commodity or service and a copy of tlr statement is attached to the purchase order.\" 26 27 25 SECTION 2. All laws and parts of laws in conflict herewith are hereb 28 29 30 repealed. 'PROVED BY\nGOVERNOR ? I I A 1 : ( lsbl28 State of Arkansas 76th General Assembly Regular Session, 1987 By: Representative Flanagin ACT 65 1987 A Bill HOUSE BILL 1 fl?-'' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For An Act To Be Entiiied AN ACT TO AMEND SECTION 2 OF ACT 639 OF 1983 [ARK. STAT. 80-552] TO REQUIRE SCHOOL DISTRICTS TO SOLICIT BIDS FOR PURCHASES OF AT LEAST $5,000.00\nAND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.\" BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS: SECTION 1. Section 2 of Act 639 of 1983, the same being Arkansas Statute 80-552, is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 2. All purchases of commodities by any school district, those specifically exempted by Section 3, shall be made except as follows: 11 12 (A) In each instance in which the estimated purchase price shall equal or exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000) the commodity shall be procured by ( S r S 13 soliciting bids. 14 Provided that the purchasing official may reject all blds and may purchase the commodity by negotiating a contract. If the purchasing 15 official, after rejecting all blds, determines that the purchase should be 16 made by negotiation then each responsible bidder who submitted a bid shall 17 18 19- 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 be notified of the determination and shall be given a reasonable opportunity to negotiate. (B) Open Market Purchases* may be made where the purchase price is less than five thousand dollars ($5,000). (C) No purchasing official shall parcel or split any item or items. with the intent or purpose to enable the purchase to be made under a less restrictive procedure. SECTION 2. hereby repealed. All laws and parts of laws in conflict with this Act are -16- .\"'PROVED BY bbkl31 GOVERHOR 1 2 3 : 4 5 6 7 S 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 IB 19 20 21 tl 23 24 25 26 27 23 29 30M O tn 2 \u0026gt; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 .. 20 21 22 23 24 25 ... 26 .. 27  28 29 30 31 32 33 34 Stale of Arkansas _ 78ih General Assembly Regular Session, 1991 ACT 7 24 1991 A Bill B}\nReprcseata'j.'es Stephens, McCuision, and McJunkin For An Act To Be Entitled HOUSE BILL 1807 \"AH ACT TO PROVIDE CIVIL PENALTIES FOR VIOLATING CERTAIN ARKANSAS LAWS RELATING TO FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY AND MANAGEMENT OF COUNTIES, MUNICIPALITIES AND SCHOOL DISTRICTS\nAND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.\" BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS\nSECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be known and cited as the \"Local Fiscal Management Responsibility Act\". SECTION 2. provides: DEFINITIONS. As used in this Act, unless the Act otherwise \"Public officer or employee\" means any officer or employee of a county, municipality, or school district located in the State of Arkaxisas{ XTb) \"Fiscal responsibility and management lavs\" means the following laws, as amended, and as applicable to the following subdivisions: (1) Counties: (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (E) Revision of County Government, Amendment 55 of the Arkansas Constitution\nCounty Record Retention, Title 13, Chapter 10 of the Arkansas Coda Annotated\nCounty Legislative Procedures, Title 14, Chapter 14, Subchapter 9 of the Arkansas Code Annotated\nCounty Executive Powers, Title 14, Chapter 14, Subchapter 11 of the Arkansas Cods Annotated\nCounty Persotmal Procedures, Title 14, Chapter 14, Subchapter 12 of the Arkansas Code Annotated\nCounty Officers, Title 14, Chapter 15 of the Arkansas Code Annotated\njmb055 1 1 / 1 (G) HB 2 3 (H) 4 5 (I) 6 7 (J) 8 9 (K) 10 11 (L) 12 13 (M) 14 15 (N) 16 17 (0) 18 Sale of County Property, Arkansas Coda Annotated SS 14-16- 105 and 14-16-106\nCounty Funds, Title 14, Chapter 21 of the'Arkansas Code Annotated\nCounty Purchasing Procedures, Title 14, Chapter 22 of the Arkansas Code Annotated\nClaims Against Counties, Title 14, Chapter 23 of the Arkansas Coda Annotated\nCounty Warrants, Title 14, Chapter 24 of the Arkansas Code Annotated\nArkansas County Accounting Law of 1973, Title 14, Chapter 25 of the Arkansas Code Annotated\nCorrection of Errors on Tax Books, Arkansas Code Annotated 26-28-111\nSettlement - Payment of Taxes, Arkansas Code Annotated 26- 39-201\nand Review of Audit Reports by Legislative Governing Bodies, Act 187 of 1991\n19 (2) Municipalities: 20 (A) 21 22 23 (B) . 24 .. 25 (C) . 26 27 (D) 28 29 (E) 30 31 (F) 32 cn 5 9 33 (G) rt- ''34 3 g M M 2 \u0026gt; 9 35 (H) Prohibited Actions by Municipal Council Members or Municipal Officials and Employees, Arkansas Coda Annotated $$ 14-42- 107 and 14-42-108\nPowers and Duties of Municipal Officers Generally, Title 14, Chapter 43, Subchapter 5 of the Arkansas Code Aiwotated\nPurchase, Lease and Sale of Real and Personal Property, Arkansas Code Annotated S 14-54-302\nCities of First Class Generally, Title 14, Chapter 58 of the Arkansas Code Annotated\nMunicipal Accounting Law of 1973, Title 14, Chapter 59 of the Arkansas Code Annotated\nMunicipal Water and Sever Department Accounting Law, Title 14, Chapter 237 of the Arkansas Coda Annotated\nArkansas Municipal Courts, Police Courts, City Courts, And Justice of the Peace Courts Accounting Law, Title 16, Chapter 10, Subchaptar 2 of the Arkansas Coda Annotated\nand'\\ Review of Audit Reports by Legislative Governing Bodies, Act J 1 jmb0551 187 of 1991} HB 2 (3) Schools: 3 (A) 5 (B) 6 7 (C) 8 9 (D) 10 11 12 13 /o3o /I ^7 (F) School Disbursing Officer, Arkansas Coda Annotated 6-13- 613\nSchool District Treasurer, Title 6, Chapter 13, Subchapter 7 of the Arkansas Code Annotated\nArkansas Teachers Salary Law, Title 6, Chapter 17, Subchapter 9 of the Arkansas Coda Annotated\nSchool Finance Acts, Title 6, Chapter 20 of the Arkansas Code Annotated\nSchools Acquisition of Commodities, Title 6, Chapter 21, Subchapter 3 of the Arkansas Code Annotated\nand Review of Audit Reports by Boards, Act 4 of 1991\n14 (4) The following laws are applicable to some or all of the political 15 subdivisions: 16 5 17  18 (A) (B)  19 20 ' 21 (C) 22 23 (D) . 24  25 (E) 26  27 28 (F) (G) 29 6 O M cn W 2 \u0026gt; a 30 31 32 (H) (I) (J) Limitation on Legislative and Taxing Power, Article 12, Section 4 of the Arkansas Constitution\nPolitical Subdivisions Kot to Become Stockholders in or Lend Credit to Private Corporations, Article 12, Section 5 of the Arkansas Constitution\nLending Credit, Article 16, Section 1 of the Arkansas Constitution\nLevy and Appropriation of Taxes, Article 16, Section 11 of the Arkansas Constitution\nLocal Capital Improveaient Bonds, Amendment 62 of the Arkansas Constitution\nRevenue Bonds, Amendment 65 of the Arkansas Constitution\nClerks of Courts, Collection and Settlement, Additional Fees, Investment of Moneys held in trust, Arkansas Code Annotated 5516-20-106, 16-20-107, and 16-20-108\nDepositories for Public Funds, Title 19, Chapter 8 of the Arkansas Code Annotated\nPublic Worrks, Title 22, Chapter 9 of the Arkansas Code Annotated\nand Local Fiscal Management Responsibility Act\nIi) (c) \"Political Subdivieion\" means any county, tnunicipality, or school 35 V 36 3 jmbO55 HB 1 district of the State of Arkansas\n2 ^(d) \"Executive Officer\" means the following for the applicable 3 political subdivisions: 10 11 1) (e) ?qt: sxsctiCivs officsT** is tHs supGirintsndenw of the school or the director of the educational cooperative\nFor municipalities, an \"executive officer\" is the mayor, city manager, or city administrator\nFor counties, an \"executive officer\" is the elected official exercising administrative control over a particular county employee\nand \"Knowingly\" means that a person is aware or should have been aware 4 5 6 7 8 9 W 12 that his conduct will violate the fiscal responsibility and management laws. 13 14 SECTION 3. COMPLIANCE WITH FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY AND MANAGEMENT LAWS. 15 16 All public officers and employees shall comply with the provisions of the fiscal management and responsibility laws contained in this Act. 17 18 SECTION 4. INVESTIGATION BY EXECUTIVE OFFICER. Upon discovery or 19 20 21 notification of an alleged violation of the fiscal responsibility and management laws, the executive officer of the political subdivision shall investigate such allegations and take appropriate administrative action. 22 23 SECTION 5. DOCUMENTATION OF VIOLATION. After completing the . 24 . 25 . 26 . 27 28 investigation, if the executive officer of the political subdivision determines that one or oxsre of the fiscal responsibility and management laws have been violated, the facts and circumstances relating to a violation and any corrective or remedial action shall be documented and placed in the personnel files of the public officer or employee involved in the violation. 29 30 SECTION 6. NOTIFICATION OF VIOLATION. The executive officer of the 11  31 political subdivision shall notify the public officer or employee of its A x) 12 findings and any corrective or remedial action to be taken. Notification 33 O M 3\" O tn co M 2 \u0026gt; a shall be made in a manner ensuring actual notice to the public officer or en^loyeo. The public officer or employee shall be notified that the failure to make corrective or remedial action within thirty(30) days after the date of notification creates the rebuttable presuinptlon that the violation was 35 4 jmbO55 1 committed knowingly. HB 2 3 SECTION 7. REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION. The public officer or employee 4 5 6 violating a fiscal responsibility and management law shall ba given not more than thirty (30) days from the date of notification to effect corrective or remedial action recommended by the executive director of the political 7 suhdiviaion. Failure to make corrective or remedial action within thirty (30) 8 9 days after notification createa the rebuttable presumption that the violation was committed knowingly. 10 11 SECTION 8. REFERRAL TO PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, (a) If the executive 12 officer determines that there has been a violation of the fiscal 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 responsibility and management laws, the executive officer may request the appropriate prosecuting attorney to conduct an Investigation regarding the violation(s). (b) The Legislative Joint Auditing Committee may request the appropriate prosecuting attorney to conduct an investigation regarding violations of the fiscal responsibility and management laws documented in the audit report. (c) The prosecuting attorney shall conduct a timely investigation into 21 all matters referred to him under the provisions of thia Act. If the 22 23 .24 25 prosecuting attorney falls to conduct a timely investigation or file a civil suit under the provisions of this Act, the executive officer or the Legislative Joint Auditing Committee may request the Attorney General to conduct an investigation into the violations. .26 -.27\n^28 29 SECTION 9. CIVIL SUIT BY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY. After conducting an 30 I 31 32 investigation Into the alleged violations, the appropriate prosecuting attorney or the Attorney General may file a civil suit In Circuit Court against the public offlcer(s) or employee(s) alleged to have violated the fiscal responsibility and management laws. Venue shall be in the county where the political subdivision Is located. I 3 to 2 tn M 2 \u0026gt; a 33 SECTION 10. CIVIL PENALTY. If the public officer or employee la found 35 by the Court to have knowingly violated the provialona of the fiscal responsibility and management laws, the Court shall Impose a civil penalty 5 jmbO55 '/i HB V 13 C' 44- \u0026gt; O n CO \u0026gt; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 '18 19  20 21 22 23\n24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 12 33 .34 ye upon the public officer or employee of not less than one hundred dollars ($100), nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000) for each violation, and may subject the public officer or employee to the payment of damages resulting as a direct consequence of any violation. SECTION 11. RECOVERY OF COSTS. If the public officer or employee is found by the Court to have knowingly violated the provisions of the fiscal responsibility and management laws, the prosecuting attorney or the Attorney General shall be allowed to recover costs and attorney fees associated with the civil suit from the public officer or employee. Any costs or fees recovered by a prosecuting attorney under this provision shall be deposited into an account administered by the prosecuting attorney and shall be used for expenses of the office. Any costs or fees recovered by the Attorney General under this provision shall be deposited into the State Treasury. SECTION 12. CIVIL PROCEDURES APPLY. All actions and procedures under the provisions of this Act are civil in nature and shall be governed by the appropriate rules, regulations, and laws regarding civil actions and remedies. SECTION 13. EXISTING REMEDIES NOT IMPAIRED. The provisions of this Act are supplemental to any other remedies available by law. In addition, the provisions of this Act do not limit or diminish any civil rights administrative procedures available political subdivision. SECTION 14. or to any public officer or employee or All provisions of this act of a general and permanent nature are amendatory to the Arkansas Code of 1987 Annotated and the Arkansas Code Revision Commission shall incorporate the same in the Code. SECTION 15. If any provision of this act or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the act which can be given affect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this act are declared to ba severable. SECTION 16. hereby repealed. All laws and parts of laws in conflict with this act are tn r PROVED ( I -A 3 - governor inibOS? 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT EPS CODE: DI FISCAL ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING The district accounting system will provide an accurate record of financial tmraen saaiscitniocns . acRuueucoiiurdnsi y will be nse..t. upK and ma in4t. ai7n edJ on a kbaaes4ics consistent with the accounting system detailed in the Accounting Manual for Local __ School District of Arkansas. riifli. In keeping with Board Policy, accounting will be bandied P-PtV^o^tnthaa.^t .nthee Board may receive monthly reports fr,o,m,, ,t,heer s .\u0026gt; Si. Superintendent on 4,.,^. --------------- -  - - , of funds as needed, and make investments of surplus funds. Cr. ixa js SSS .Vr .1 'X :*i The following purposes must be satisfied by the accounting system: . 1. 2 Administrative Control: The financial records must be adequate to guide the making or deferring of purchases, the expanding or curtailing of programs, and the controlling of expenses. Current data should\nbe c immediately available and in such form that periodic suntnarie^ may be,.I^^^^ readily made from the data. Budget Preparation: The financial records must be ad^uate-fd?serY^iAtgj^^ a guide to budget estimates of subsequent years, and to hold expenditure^ to the amounts appropriated. Accounts are to be kept for each item for.--/\" which separate budget estimates must be made. An adequate code of^expep^ diture accounts will be used. *. 1* \u0026gt; .'.tk/ 4\u0026lt;. '-'TT.^nZJZJX^laCKlUam  \u0026lt;- ................-i. a.-' Accounting for Stewardship: The financial records of the district\nntsra adequate to show that those .in charge have handled funds within the frame  work of law and in accordance with Board policy. The districts financial records will provide the following information 1. 2. I V3. 4. 5. e  -  ' A--- y . For each account in the districts budget: the appropriation, expenditures\nencimbrances, and unencumbered balance.   For each purchase order\nthe name of vendor, description of the item -a involved, the amounts, the call for bids if required, and an abstract:\nof the bids received. , For each purchase\nthe purchase order information above, plus the record, of receipt and condition of goods, the invoice and the record of payment For each income account\nthe budget estimate, the estimates as revised periodically, the receipts to date, and the balance anticipated. Income received under the-abatement procedure will be debited to the appropriate previously expended account. Legal Reference: Arkansas School Laws\n80-524, Act 384 of 1977, Section 7. Act 111 of 1979.  f  '5 I t U s A. B. C. D. E. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT INTRA-SCHOOL FUNDS EPS CODE: DIA Depository Intra-school or activity funds shall be deposited in a single bank account at the bank selected for District funds. Source of Funds Funds to be deposited in these accounts are those derived from school organization activities, athletic events, school concessions, bookstore operation, and authorized fund raising drives. Record and Management Procedures Record keeping and management procedures to be followed in handling of these funds shall be prescribed by administrative directive. Purchasing . Purchase shall be in accordance with district purchasing policies and defined by administrative directive referenced above. Responsibility *  ' The fund manager shall be responsible for the proper management of  these funds. He/she shall sign all requisitions/purchase orders or related transaction documents that initiate or result in disbursement of activity funds. The Director of Financial Accounting Services shall be responsible for ensuring that activity fund transactions conform to appropriate policies and procedures and are accounted for properly. f Adopted: 12-17-811 '4' 5 i '/\u0026gt; ' LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT  \u0026gt; f-,r\u0026gt;, 'S .^EPS CODE^ : DJ I? ''r * f R 'y\\-. vc'* \u0026gt; I purchasing\n4 J/jiSS ,T !r ''O'T\nThe function of purchasing Is to serve, the' eHucaildhal pro^^^ K the necessary supplies, equipment, and services IX\nV 4 The Board I\nn_t_e_n_d__s to ,purchase competitively without prejudice.\nand. to/seek maximum educational value for every dollar expended ,1. 0^ be^entril 1 ze\u0026lt;\n^1n ? lAhe acquisition of supplies, equipment, and services w^Vbe^ceri^^ J rhe Purchasing PepartmentHwhich functions under the supervision of, the.Ex- Officio Financial Secretary, and through whose office all purchasing-\ntransaction '^are conducted. he acquisition of supplies, equipment, and services will the Ex-Officio Financial Secretary the responsibility for The prime guidelines governing_ The Board assigns the quality and quantity of. purchases made. ...- r. \n-  -- -jf tthhiiss rreessppoonnssiibbiilliittyy aarree tthhaatt aallll ppuurrcchhaasseess ftaailll wwiittmhinn txhnee fTrraammeewwuor r/,Of\n'-pZ budgetary limitations and be consistent with the approved educational- goals and programs of the district.. 'p'. i Adopted: 12-17-81 -V' .A 4 i j a . '4' \u0026gt; f. It?- r -fT ^'.4 'I 1 ' rT : 1  LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT EPS CODE: DJA PURCHASING AUTHORITY the responsibility of the Purchasing Department to make purchases for school use. The Superintendent or his designee, the Director of Purchasing U.ruuyh the Ex-Officio Financial Secretary, is authorized to approve purchases in accordance with budget allocations except when such transactions must be It is through put to bid. D Individual.schools and departments will have no authority to make purchases except as these are approved by the Purchasing Office, 0 . 1 mzA -   Purchasing shall be*made on written order from the Purchasing Office in keeping with properly approved written requisitions. F-\"?* ,only-as\n:provided for by administwtive,directive., , .. ,.... Exceptions may be made X\"' 3\n'P.  Jt- S'' 'F^.j 'acti/sujr.s {A\u0026gt;. 2'^ y-i- 4* ^sjcr\u0026gt;\ncjcr\u0026gt;\u0026lt;oc  e- 75' R I .. Adopted: . 12-17-81 r 'tt- \u0026gt;\u0026gt;: -* \u0026lt;LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT EPS CODE: DJC BIDDING REQUIREMENTS Any item or group of items having an estimated cost of $2,000 or more must Exceptions may be made upon approval uf be purchased by soliciting bids. the Superintendent of Schools or his designee, in cases of bona fide emergencies, single source purchases, and other instances where bidding is not Any item or group of items feasible or required conimodities are exempt. having an estimated cost of less than $2,000 may be purchased as an Open Market Purchase at the discretion of the Director of Purchasing. When bids are solicited, the lowest responsible, responsive bidder meeting specification requirements shall be awarded the order or contract unless (1) all bids are rejected and the purchase negotiated, or (2) bidders have been informed that factors other than price alone, are to be considered in the award of the bid. Sufficient documentation will be maintained to substantiate competitive bid determinations. .'7'9*' LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT A i EPS CODE\nDOF PURCHASING PROCEDURES K Quality/Quanity Control  The Director of ':y The Director of Purchasing, has full authority to question and kind of materials requested and delivered.in order that the best interests of the district may be served. Consolidation of Purchases shall seek to consolidate purchases into such the district within the limits The Director of Purchasing quantities as will result in the lowest cost to of available warehousing. V School^ Books tore \u0026lt;.T terns  . i^^^^tHe^i^Wf^tbe'dlstH to-purchase\nin^quWt/and ^princ^ple iterns handled by'school bookstores.-. ...oto-. the .school bookstores at cost plus a minimum markup ^^^ocaT ^^i^sing%?s .'i . Those'^-1 terns will be sold \"to -^utner^dcwr\n^ u=..na..=M-.r.. ttoi.strict prefer^ to^dwl^ with local sources of _^s'uppTyt\nin\ntOrminimize conmunication and ..shipping problems. Where out- gg??gKS!ro.\u0026gt;ftf.-c'tate'~ve'n aqai nst.-local vendors, the local ...vendor. \"^^r^rqfanl'ed-^the five'percent preference allowed by Arkansas Preference Lai^^.-if. . Requested in writing at the time the bid is submitted. Other^actors being .equal ST is r jr z :52 nrs . bi I Adopted: 12-17-81LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT EPS CODE: DJG .. VENDOR RELATIONS No favoritism will be extended to any vendor. 'Each order will be placed on the basis of quality, price, and delivery\npast services being a factor if all other considerations are equal. No employee or director of the district who has authority or influence over purchasing decisions will be an agent for, or-have any pecuniary or beneficial interest in, or receive any compensation or reward of any kind from any vendor for sale of supplies, materials, equipment, or services. Adopted: 12-17-81LITTLE RCLK SCHOOL DISTRICT EPS CODE: DK DISBURSEMENTS Disbursements shall be made only with appropriate authorization and directly to the vendors, except for petty cash expenses which shall be limited to the minimumnecessary for effective and efficient operation. Documentation (requisitions, purchase orders, evidence of receipt of goods or services, invoices, etc.) to support disbursements shall be retained in active files until after audit has been completed. A list of disbursements for each month shall be submitted for Board approval at the regular meeting the fol lowing month. I I i I Adopted: 12-17-81I i I J I I i I II }I i I 1 I I LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT EPS-CODE: GBI STAFF GIFTS AND SOLICITATIONS ..L No employee of the Little Rock School District or member of\"the Board of Directors of the said district shall accept any gratuity or favor from any supplier, contractor, or person performing personal services for the Little Rock School District. Further, the same policy will apply to any person, partnership, company or any other entity which may reasonably be expected to perform such services, or offer bids orprices for any supplies, construct!on,-or maintenance work to .. be performed for the Little Rock School District. District. or any ye Adopted: A-.? 2-25-82  T- i:\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_39","title":"Rankings of Arkansas School Districts on Selected Items","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["1991-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Educational statistics","Public schools","Pulaski County (Ark.)--History--20th century"],"dcterms_title":["Rankings of Arkansas School Districts on Selected Items"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/39"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nRANKINGS OF ARKANSAS SCHOOL DISTRICTS ON SELECTED ITEMS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS JANUARY 1991 Alicansas DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 4 STATE CAPITOL MALL  LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-1071  (501) 682-4475 BURTON L ELLIOTT, Director, General Education Division January 1991 Memo To: The Governor of Arkansas, Members of the General Assembly, and Superintendents of Public Schools Fran: Burton L. Elliott, Director, General Education Division Subject: Rankings of the School Districts on Selected Items Contained herein are the names of the school districts of Arkansas ranked on the basis of twelve (12) selected items contained in the Annual Statistical Re\nirt of the Public Schools (Re~rt op the !louse Concurrent Resolution No. 58 of 1961) dated January, 1991. These figures do not incl e expenditures of restricted ederal funds such as OCIA or personnel paid with federal funds. Data for 1989-90 are actual\ndata for 1990-91 are estimates. The school districts are listed in LF.An 1111bero rder beginning on page 3 for easy reference. This should permit the reader to quickly locate an individual district on any table. Definitions of iteir.s included are listed below: l. ~ Per AM. The current expense, less the amount received fran the other districts for tuition, divided by the resident ADA~. rgarten expense and kindergarten pupils are included in this figure. n,e 1989-90 ADAw ere used in computing the expense for both years. 2. Average Daily Attendance. TI,e ADA is total days of attendance divided by the nunber of days taught. This nt\u0026gt;nber includes those who attend school outside the district on a tuition agreement between the respective districts. Th.is is the annual average. 3. Avera~~ llenbership. n1e total days of attendance and absence divided by the n1111ber of day, taught. This nunber includes t eo attend outside the district on tuition agreement between the respective districts. Th.is is the annual average. nie overage for tlie first three (3) quarters is used for MFPA and transportation aid purposes. 4. llnber of Teachers lt-12. Includes all certificated personnel except superintendents, principals, supervisors, assistant superintendents, and those paid with federal funds. 5. Average Salary of Teachers lt-12. The average salary of tlie personnel defined in item four (4) above. 6. NU11beco f Certificated Persomel. n,e n1111bero f personnel defined in item four (4) above plus superintendents, principals, supervisors, and assistant superintendents. Personnel paid with federal funds are not included. 7. Average Salary of Certificated Persantl. The average salary of the personnel defined in item six (6). The data contained lierein should be of interest to persons desiring to compare the statistics of one district with those of another. for additioMl infonMtion call or write the Office of Statistics and Local Fiscal Services, Division of Department of Finance and Aan.lnistration, 501-682-4259. Printing of this publication has been made possible by n1e United States Department of Education in conjunction with The National Center for Education Statistics (ICES), P. L. 100-297. The information presented or reported herein was printed pursuant to a grant Cran the United States Office of Education, Department of Health, Education and Welfare. However, the opinions expressed herein do not necesarily reflect the position or policy of tl,e United Stales Office of Education, and no official endorsement by the lklited States Office of Education should be inferred. In keeping with the guidelines on Title VI, Section 601 1 Civil RipJ1ts Act of 1964 j Title IX, Section 901, F.ducstional Amenclincnts of 1972\nand Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 197J, the Arkansas Department of Education assures that no person tn the United States shall on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex or handicap be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any progr1111 or activity receiving federal financial assistance.  An Equal Opportunity Employer Page 2 CONSOLIDATIONS AND ANNEXATIONS Effective July l, 1990, the following districts were consolidated or annexed: Wilmar consolidated with Drew Central (Drew County). Washington annexed to Blevins, Hope and Saratoga (Hempstead County). Oil Trough annexed to Newark and Southside (Independence County). Garland (Miller County) consolidated with Lewisville (Lafayette county). Effective October 16, 1990, court ordered annexation for the following district: *Camden annexed to Fairview (Ouachita County). T *Due to late annexation of Camden to Fairview, the 1990-91 information for Camden was reported separately. ARKANSAPSU BLIC SCHOOi ANNUALFI SCAL REPORTA NAYi SIS 3 EXPENSE 1989-90 NUMBERO f AVG, SLRY. NO. OF CERT. AVG. SLRY. PER ADA TEACHERSK -12 TCHRS. K-12 PERSONNEL CERT. PERS. 89 90 90-91 AIPIA A/DIM 89-90 90-91 89-90 90-91 89-90 90-91 89-90 90-91 I EA  COUNTY DISTRICT RANK 1 ,, 3 4 5 6 7 B 9 10 11 12 01 01 ARKANSAS PEWITT ? 536 2 622 3-=\no 1 ,4':)? 94 0 9'1 Q ,,,, oc\n3 ?2 or.:\no j00,4 jOi .4 22,905 ?2.964 01 02 ARKANSAS GILLETT 2 :\u0026gt;,906 3.357 281 :,94 24.3 26.5 19.032 19,066 26.9 29 ..5. 20.442 20.444 01 04 ARKANSAS STIITTGART 3 2,3?8 2 467 ,, 3?6 ?,445 152.4 15?.1 22 .10B 23.172 162+5 16?.i 22.966 24,059 01--05 ARKANSAS HJJHPHREY 4 ') C-.94 ?,785 294 309 -\"\u0026gt;? 5 ~,, fl 20 ?''3 ?i 755 ?4,6 24,6 21 .20~\n2:\u0026gt;.741 02-01 ASHLEY CROSSETT 5 2,518 2,595 2,638 2,759 179.8 184.1 23,442 23,595 190.2 196.i 24.240 24,434 02 02 ASHLEY ECIINTAINH ILL 6 3,013 3,099 234 248 21.2 21.3 19.983 :?0.030 23,2 ?3,3 21.228 2i. 632 02 03 ASHJE Y HAHBIIRG 7 2 512 ,, 656 :t , 6Cj6 1 748 l12 Q i09 4 :\u0026gt;0.707 :,?,346 !19.7 ii7.2 2?,Qj6 2\n5,314 0? 04 ASHLEY PARKDALE 8 2,953 2.787 161 168 14.3 14.5 17.153 17,445 16.3 16.5 19,540 16,893 03-02 BAXTER COTTER 9 2,709 2,729 510 540 36.8 36.5 21,033 21.576 39.8 39.5 22,265 22,742 03-03 BAXTER MOUNTAIHNO ME 10 ?.534 2,602 3,229 3,401 195.5 195,0 22,878 23,360 210.5 210.7 23,819 24,366 03-04 BAXTER NORFORK ii 2,288 2,443 455 478 29.6 31.0 19,675 20,001 32.6 34.0 21,058 21,351 03-06 BAXTER TRI-COUNTYC ON. 12 4,646 4,547 164 175 18.7 18.2 20,384 20,769 21.7 20.2 21,765 21,980 04-0i BENTON BENTONVILLE i3 2,353 2.438 3,789 3,996 229.0 232 .. 7 22,905 23,166 244.0 247.7 23,975 24,278 04-02 BENTON DECATUR 14 2,677 2,961 477 503 39.2 43.0 18,905 19,466 42.2 46.0 19,871 20,414 04-03 BENTON GENTRY i5 2,540 2,608 969 1,022 70.6 71.5 20,871 20,597 74.6 75.5 21,600 21,281 04 04 BENTON GRAVETTE 16 2,081 2,455 1,056 1.119 64.5 67.0 20.604 22,504 69.0 71.0 21,436 23,264 04--05 BENTON ROGERS 17 2,555 2,626 5,861 6,187 350.7 357.9 25,081 25,296 379.3 385 .. 5 26,126 26,389 04-06 BENTON SILOAM SPRINGS 18 2.421 2,664 2,074 2.198 129.0 133.0 22,695 23,808 139.0 144.0 23,745 24,980 04-07 BENTON PEA RIDGE 19 2,308 2,726 665 708 45.8 51.0 19,387 21,391 49.1 54 .. 2 20,569 22,320 05-01 BOONE ALPENA 20 2.592 2,699 458 481 32.0 31.6 21,356 22,577 35.0 34.6 22,521 23,845 05-02 BOONE BERGMAN 21 2,468 2,702 646 673 40.2 42.6 23,312 23,420 43.2 45.6 24,605 24,730 05 03 8QONE HARRISON 22 2,284 2,403 2,490 2,612 i45.4 i5i,4 22.355 23.057 162.3 162.3 23,461 24,212 05-04 BOONE OHAHA 23 3.308 3,398 266 285 23.1 22.9 20,416 20,629 25.9 25.7 21,840 22,109 05-05 BOONE VALLEYS PRINGS 24 2.484 2.557 760 798 50.0 50.5 23.166 23,672 54.0 54.5 23.931 24,431 05 06 BQONE LEAD HILL 25 3,124 3,256 321 341 26.1 26.3 20.035 20.221 28.8 29.1 2L656 21.756 06--01 BRADLEY HERHITAGE 26 2,591 2,612 602 636 39,5 40,0 21,056 21,062 42.5 43.0 22,194 22,049 06-02 BRADLEY WARREN 27 2,428 2,470 1.727 i.805 121.0 114.7 22,192 23,046 130.4 125 .. 2 23,450 24,340 07-0f C.AI HCIIN HAMPTON 28 2.510 2,684 873 910 59.2 59.2 22,333 23,710 62.7 62.7 23,430 24,735 oe-01 CARROLL BERRYVILLE 29 2,277 2,403 1,247 1,310 82.0 81.5 20,959 22,362 86.5 86,0 21,632 23,023 08-02 CARROLL EUREKSAP RINGS 30 2.473 2.476 586 617 41.0 40.0 21,027 21,808 44.0 43.0 22,196 22,943 08-03 CARROLL GREENF OREST 31 2,252 2,435 1.069 1,128 70.3 71.3 20,676 21,864 76.0 77.0 21.557 22,644 09-01 CHICOT DERMOTT 32 2,392 2.574 1,214 1,280 77.8 74.3 22,387 28,490 82.8 79.3 23,287 29,061 09-02 CHICOT EUDORA 33 2,825 2,858 950 991 68.6 68.0 21,672 22,556 74.8 74.1 23,034 23,882 09-03 CHICOT LAKESIDE 34 2,693 2,529 1,258 1.341 86,4 88,0 21,015 20,749 92.4 94.0 21.874 21.634 10-01 CLARK AMITY 35 2,823 2,920 278 295 21.8 21.1 20,943 20,979 23.9 23.2 22,056 22,122 10-02 CLARK ARKADELPHIA 36 2,624 2,739 2,104 2,203 145.1 146.9 22,085 22,426 155.0 156.8 22,900 23,511 i0-03 CLARK GURDON 37 2,554 2,536 869 911 65.0 65.4 20,036 20,094 69.6 69.4 20,986 20,918 ii-Qi CLAY CORNING 38 2,468 2,471 1,201 i,296 85.i 82.4 21,752 21,848 90.6 87.9 22,660 22,756 11-04 CLAY PIGGOTT 39 2,390 2,445 904 948 67.2 64.9 19,495 20,693 71.2 68.9 20,252 21,405 H-06 CLAY CLAYC OUNTYC ENTR4 0 2,403 2,560 756 791 54.7 54,7 19,664 21,264 57.7 57.7 20,353 21,875 12-01 CLEBURNE CONCORD 41 2,479 2,656 512 544 35.7 34,0 20,965 22,053 38.7 37.0 22,059 23,302 12-02 CLEBURNE HEBER SPRINGS 42 2,340 2,509 1,253 1,327 83.5 88.5 21,795 21,878 88.9 93.8 22,741 22,776 12-03 CLEBURNE QUITMAN 43 2,568 2,587 539 570 38.9 38.8 22,553 22,433 41.9 41.8 23,40l. 23,292 12-04 CLEBURNE WEST SIDE 44 2,652 2,899 399 419 30.0 31.7 21,029 20,719 33.0 34.7 21,944 21,694 12-05 CLEBURNE WILBURN 45 3,235 3,089 160 171 15.5 15.7 17,461 17,949 17.5 17.7 19,728 20,319 i3-01 CLEVELAND KINGSLAND 46 2,896 2,879 389 406 26.8 26.8 21,424 19,646 29.9 29.7 22,368 20,791 13-03 CLEVELAND RISON 47 2,503 2,565 632 659 42.7 44.7 22,133 22,391 45.7 47,7 23,204 23,328 ARKANSASP UBLIC SCHOOLD ISTRICTS ANNUALF ISCAL REPORTA NALYSIS LEA ORDE:R PACE NO. 4 EXPENSE 1989-90 NUMBERC F AVG SLRY. NC. CF CERT. AVG SLRY. PER ADA TEACHER$ K-12 TCHRS K-t2 f'fBSONNEL CERT PERS 89-90 90-91 AID/A AIDIM B9 90 90--91 89-90 90-91 82 90 90--91 89-20 90-91 LEA t COUNTY DISTRICT RANK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 to U 12 13 04 CLEYEIAND WQQQI AWN 48 ., 497 2 62f ,407 ,42f 30 4 30 4 f9 525 20,179 33 4 33 4 20 868 21 437 u 01 COLUMBIA EHERSON 49 3,000 3,173 377 395 29.6 30 6 22,992 23,450 32 6 33 6 24 336 24 722 u 02 COLUHBIA HAGNOLIA 50 2,317 2,436 2,947 3.124 175.1 177.2 23.B74 24,616 188.3 121.2 24 933 25,678 14 03 COJ IJHBIA HCHEIL 51 2,632 2 280 334 357 25 5 25 5 17 880 1A 772 28 5 28 5 19 298 19 224 14:=(M COLUHBIA TAYLOR 52 2,820 2,676 351 364 27.5 26.0 20.507 20,641 30.5 29.0 21,719 22.065 14-06 COLUHBIA WALDO 53 2,616 2,633 518 550 40 1 39 3 20 092 20.550 43 6 42 3 21 505 21 226 14-07 COLUHBIA WALKER 54 2,892 2,861 236 246 21 5 2, 5 18 311 18 579 24 5 24 0 19 288 20,059 5- MWAY NEl10 VISTA 55 2.683 2,774 375 395 29.6 29.0 20.633 20.243 32 1 32.0 21,553 21 180 ___ 15-05 CONWAY WONDER'.'LIEW 56 2,465 2,581 421 442 30 5 30.0 18 823 19 064 33,5 33 0 f9 9c\n2 20 303 15-07 CONWAY so. CONWAYco . 57 2 503 2 634 2 450 ., 600 152 0 153 0 21 775 22 283 164 7 165 7 22 7i7 23 193 16-01 CRAIGHEAD tAY-BROWN 8 2,600 2,635 609 642 41.7 4\n\u0026gt;.7 20.745 21,182 44.7 45 7 21,685 22,112 16-02 CRAIGHEAD WEST SIDE 59 2,359 2.518 1.235 1.313 79.8 SLR 20,882 21,321 86 8 89 8 21,805 ?2 307 16 03 CRAIGHEAD BROOKLAND 60 2,461 2,636 797 84t 53 5 54 0 21 528 22 720 56 s 57 0 22 476 23 631 16-05 CRAIGHEAD BUFFALOJS LAt!Q CE 61 2,463 2,650 793 827 sa.o 59.0 20.902 21.367 61-7 63,7 21.581 2?.142 16-08 CRAIGHEAD 2,560 2,617 4.598 4,844 306.3 306.3 25.267 25,674 326 3 376 3 26 133 26 509 16 ii CRAIGHEAD NETTLETON 2,592 2 602 483 1,579 102 5 106 5 21 934 21 4?7 109 5 1:14 3 22 166 ?2 225 16-12 CRAIGHEAD VALLEY YIEW 4 2,185 2,484 932 976 56.3 57.5 22 809 24 308 S2 3 6i s 23 44i 25,084 16-13 CRAIGHEAD IVERSIDE 5_2.,507 2,671 818 861 59.o 59 0 20,362 21,390 62 0 63 0 21 38!5 22 395 17-01 CRAWFORD AIHA 2 257 ., 378 2 158 ., 262 130 0 136 5 22 823 23 5'1 139 2 145 7 24 131 24 851 17-02 CRAWFORD CEDAR~ILI.E_ 6J. 2,418 2,570 723 776 48,6 50,7 2'\u0026gt;.751 23.416 5LB 53 7 23 645 24.355 17-03 CRAWFORD MOUNTAINBURG ----68 ~ 2,592 770 822 53.0 53.6 21,989 2? 526 56 0 56 6 22 801 ?3 372 17 04 CRAWFORD MULBERRY 69 2.504 2,618 422 449 32 7 33 1 21 308 21 652 36 0 36 4 22 487 ?2 736 17-05 CRAWFORD VAN_BUREl'I 70 2,269 2,452 4,207 4,499 256.0 267 2 24.320 25,050 272.5 283,7 25.262 26 037 18-01 CRITTENDEN CRAWF08DSV..ILLE._ 71 2,473 2,607 555 584 38.8 38.8 19.029 19,323 42.0 42,5 20 311 20,546 18 02 CRITTENDEN EARLE 7? ?,919 2 742 1,002 1,069 69 0 71 5 24 67? 2?,883 23 7 76 7 25 543 '\u0026gt;3 843 18-03 CRITTENDEN WEST MEMPHIS 73\n!J27 2,527 5.750 6.121 384.1 385.6 23,966 25.141 411.1 412.6 24.799 25.893 18-04 CRITTENDEN MARION 74 2,373 2.589 2,287 2,426 139.5 142.0 23.420 24.099 151.1 153.7 24. 511 25,102 18-05 CRITTENDEN TURRELL 75 2,926 2,804 530 568 34 0 33 7 2? 421 C'? 648 37 6 37 0 23 839 24 069 19-01 CROSS CROSS COUNTY 76 2,614 2,669 862 902 62.0 61.5 19,776 19.719 65.5 66.6 20,639 20,674 19-03 CROSS PARKIN 77 ~ 2,896 :no 604 43.3 40.9 19.715 20,252 46.3 43.9 21,036 21.678 19 05 CROSS WYNNE 78 2,341 2,516 2.783 \",926 181 4 162 1 22 804 ?4 208 193 0 193 7 23 730 25 051 20-01 DALLAS CARTHAGE 79 3.,204 3,422 163 173 17.5 17.5 17.130 19.129 19.:5 19.5 19,082 20,494 20-02 DALLAS FORDYCE 80 2_,J\nl42 3.030 1.294 1,358 87.2 89.5 22.407 22.403 94.0 96.5 23.255 23.326 20-03 DALLAS SPARKMAN 81 2.514 2.687 370 391 29.7 28,5 18 584 20 029 31 7 30 5 21 463 21-01 DESHA ARKANSASC ITY 82 5\u0026amp;43 ~.942 141 1:i1 11+:5 18.2 22.968 22,955 20.0 20.7 25.273 21-02 DESHA DELTA SPECIAL 83 3,041 2,961 312 331 26.5 27.1 19.992 18,616 29.5 30.i 20,351 21 03 DESHA DESHA DREW 84 3.094 3. 109 189 200 11.6 11.2 17.969 18.097 13.6 20,705 21-04 DESHA DUMAS 85 4.IJ!_92 2,380 2,253 2,377 131.0 130.5 24,355 24,661 141.5 25,782 21-05 DESHA MCGEHEE 86 2,150 2 247 1 252 1 305 78.0 00.0 21,537 21,597 83.5 22.434 22-02 DREW DREW CENTRAL 87 2,410 3.102 860 900 54.9 69.1 22,300 22,066 57.9 23.146 22-03 DREW MONTICELLO 88 2 609 2 578 2 065 2 158 142.1 136.9 21,839 22.764 154.1 23,947 22-05 DREW __ WILMAR 89 3 236 190 1 6 20.5 03 23-01 FAULKNER CONWAY 90 2,346 2,601 5,298 5,575 321.1 345,6 24,427 25. 143 344.6 371.1 25.461 26,109 23-02 FAULKNER ENOLA 91 3,382 2,971 133 139 14.9 12.6 16,491 17,583 16.9 13.6 18.620 19.118 23-03 FAULKNER GREENBRIER 92 2 219 2,430 1,443 1,520 82.0 87.0 23.832 24,914 87.0 93,0 24,691 25,826 23-04 FAULKNER GUY-PERKINS 93 3,089 3,124 278 290 22.9 23.9 20,431 20,290 25.0 26.0 21,578 21,400 23-05 FAULKNER MAYFLOWER 94 2,286 2,438 647 687 40.5 45.0 21,685 21,867 43.5 48.0 23.225 22,743 _LEA_~ COUNTY lW3IRICL ARKANSAS PUBLlC SCHOOL DISTRICTS ANNUAL FISCAL REPORT ANALYSIS LEA ORDER RANK EXPENSE P.ER_ADA 1989 90 89 90 90 91 A/DIA A/D/H J. ____2_ ____3, ___ .:,__ NUMBER Of AVG. SLRY. TEACHERS K 12 TCHRS. K-12 89 90 90-91 89 90 90-91 6 7 8 NO. Of CERT. PERSONNEL B9 90 90 91 9 10 PAGE NO. 2 AVG. CERT. 89 90 11 SLRY. PERS. 90 91 12 23-06 EAIII KNER HOIINT VERNON 95 ,, 662 2 831 2\"9 239 19,5 19,7 18.301 19.027 ?1 5 21,7 19,540 19,946 -23::-07 FAULKNER VILONIA ----'26 ~224 2,649 1.495 1.568 88.5 97.0 23.066 24,103 9:5.:S 104.0 23,961 2~ 4 01 FRANKLIN ALTUS-::DENNING ...97 .2.,_t,03 2,562 319 345 26.6 25.6 19.438 19,388 28.6 27.6 20.629 20,656 __ ?4-02 FRANKi IN CHARI E9TQN 9B ~.397 2.475 676 702 46 O 46.0 2?.091 2?.276 49.0 49.0 22.B73 23,216 ---24::::Q3 FRANKLIN .COUNTY LINE 99 .2,684. ~726 564 599 4L.9_ 41.9 20.022 21.540 __ 4~~9 __ 44.9 20,822 22,328 4:::04 FRANKLIN __C1ZA8K 100 2,364 2.-5.2-1_..,1~-~3~1~e~_.1~--= 4u_0_u.87.ccO_4_ J 85. 5 22. 245 22. 760 -~9~~4~_9 L 9 23, 192 23, 745 EBANKllN PLEASANT VIEW 101 3 136 3.29B 237 251 19,2 21,0 20.001 20.009 21.2 23.0 21.43:5 21.218 -25..-01 FULTON MAMMOTSHP RING 102 2,678 2,766 45~~8 _\n34.3 33.8 21,976 22,068 36.8 36.3 23,108 23,154 --25-_0.2_FUL.ION ALEH 103 2,444 2,545 __6_42 676 45.8 4I__.8 20,380 20_,___570 48.8 50.8 21,403 21,542 2:5 03 FLH TON VIOL A 104 \" 772 2.B32 396 418 30.0 30.0 21.314 21.674 32.0 32.0 22,442 22.802\nu,-O.L..GARLJllil2 CUTTER-MORNING ST105 2,777 2.,899 456 __ 492 34.6 35.6 22 858 22 966 3!L__L 38.6 24,130 24,146 ---26::.Q.2..ldIB.LAt-m. FOUNTAIN LAKE 106 2,978 3,041 868 921 62.7 62.5 24 315 24 497 68.0 67.0 25,635 25,705 26-03 GARI AND HOT SPRINGS 107 3.183 3,216 3,266 3.495 246.0 239.5 24,044 24,583 262.5 256.0 25,062 25,643 -2.6..-~..GABLA!IID_ JESSIEVILLE 108 3,088 3,168 552 _ 581 41.5 41.5 23,389 23 1 441 44.6 44.6 24,573 24 1 573 -26:=05...GARLAND _LAKE..HAHI.LTON 109 2,.346 2,.514 163.5 _ __.,_,,6,.,,3,_..0_24,12356,4 73 176.0 176.0 25 336 26 599 26-06 GARI AND IAKESIDE 110 2,492 2,646 127.3 127.4 23,387 24,147 137,3 137,4 24,256 25,036 26-07 GARLAND HOl.!tffAIN PINE 111 2,690 2,791 43~4 42_.4 20 529 21,943 _4~6-~4~_45.4 21,725 2~84 ..2:Z:::Q3_ Ci.R8NL.. YEN. ___1_12 2,947 3,3:51 250 18.0 0.1 22,892 22,787 -~2=0~~0~_~2=0.1 24,182 24 279 27-04 GRANT PRATTSVILLE 113 2,937 3.009 283 17.0 17.0 25,949 26.600 19,0 19.0 27,386 28,067 27-0:S GRANT SHERIDAN 114 2,361 2,__547 3 4'-' 201. 9_ _,2,,_,0..\u0026lt; .,\u0026gt;65.,,_,,2 .,,2\"--'--'6\"'0\"'5\"-'2\"'3\"'-'-'3 .,~,3 ~o_9 ,\u0026lt;,2-,_...1.,'2-'_-9,.___1.,.,\",6'2-''--\"2,..,3'-L.\u0026gt;5,,0\"'8'-----\"2..:4,___,_,28-01 GREENE DELAPLAINE 115 3,154 3_..__u__7 263 21.4 21.6 20,740 21~4 24.~0~-=2~4--\".2 21 677 21 920 28 03 GREENE MARMADUKE 116 2,389 2.491 657 40,5 40.5 22.218 23,498 43,5 43.5 23,116 24,404 2B-06_GBEENE STANFORD 117 3,082 3__,__gj5 206 216 19.8 20.0 18 518 19 284 22.3 22.3 19,623 20,134 28-07 GREENE GREENE COUNTY TEC118 2,.353 2.,.481 ~O 2 11 26 3 3 3 22 277 22,875 135.1 140.1 23 101 23 683 2B OB GREENE NORTHEAST ARKANSA119 2,529 2 2,404 151.3 151.5 22.378 23,224 162.8 161.7 23,212 23,923 _29_::0_i_l:IEtTEAD ~LEVlNS 120 2,712 2 418 30.9 31,020,372 21,118 33.9 34.0 21,129 21,960 29-03 HEMPSTEAD HOPE 121 2,322 _ _....,_--'-\"-=---\"'-'---\"05197 4.0 79.5 23 262 24,350 186.0 191.5 24,210 25,342 29-05 HEMPSTEAD SARATOGA 122 2,689 284 298 23,8 24.8 18,717 18,996 26.3 27.3 20,028 20,267 29-06 HEMPSTEAD SPRING HILL 123 2,778 2,795 269 288 21.0 22.0 19 456 19 669 -~2~4~~0~_~2=5=~0~2=0~6=4~9~2=0~9~7~6,,__ 29-QJ HEMPSTEA WASHINGTON 124 3,061 201 210 16.7 19,680 18.7 20,413 30-01 SPRING BISMARCK 125 2,412 2,712 727 774 47,o 48.2 21,925 23,135 50.0 51.2 22,989 23,991 30-02 SPRING GLEN ROSE 126 2., 560 2, 725._ __ 7,__7,_,5=-----_-'_8 \"'-=,,-,1_5._9, ,2__, .___,,,,,65. c.,,_,62_', -_=, 2\"'3'--',_,,3'-'9'-'9~:: \u0026gt;=_-',-54,!,6,.5J,,c\"l-.!'-8'~., _5,,0,,,5_~,3.._,, ,6_,_,2,,:,,3:4.,L,,3, ,,,6c..__e,2e,5'--'-'--'7--'30-0 PRING AGNET COVE 127 2.L693 2,_67~ 603 624 44.5 42.4 21,025 21,195 47.5 45.4 21,959 22 1 161 30-04 SPRING MALVERN 120 2,102 2,327 2,638 2,754 172,o 174.0 21,533 22,034 101.0 183.5 22 1 147 22,687 30-05 SPRING OUACHITA 129 2 1 522 2 1 697 379 396 29.4 29.4 18 1 182 18 1 860 32.3 32.3 19,343 20,067 ARD~----~D~I~E~RKS 13Q 2,335 2,471 559 583 39.6 40.2 20,329 21,120 42.6 43.2 21,295 22,139 ARD MINERAL SPRINGS 131 2,333 2,418 496 519 37,1 37.0 19,581 19,600 40.7 40.7 20,813 20,906 D NASHVILLE --=1=3=2~=2~=2~9-=8~1=_2,~,5~9~1~~1~,~6~7~3=----~1,,_,~7~6~3,,__1=0~6,.__,_.2=--=1=0=_8 ==_0,1-=-=12==32=~=,-2==3-~-7--~_4_,,1,=,21~=25~=,..=.,47-',-,'2=037~ ,3~1~0,,_2~3\"'--'--,::D UMPIRE 133 4 441~-4~8 06,=9~_~1=2=0=-----~1=2\"'5,,__---=-1_,4_._.=0--=1-=5ce--\"0~2=0~,__,,0~7---'9_,,2=0'--'''--'7c..e-'6--e\"e03..._.,_4~-=12,,=72~\"-':-.\"c'30'=-'---9-.-.-,-,2--~=--INDEPENDENCE BATESVILLE 134 2,526 2,628 2,338 2,463 156.5 156.5 23,631 25,464 168.0 167.7 24,423 26,114 32-02 INDEPENDENCE CORD-CHARLOTTE 135 2,621 2,746 243 254 19,2 19.1 20,300 20,743 21.2 21.1 21 1 581 22,014 32-03 INDEPENDENCE CUSHMAN 136 3,064 3.515 265 287 22.2 23.9 21,170 21,973 24.7 26.4 22,492 23,228 32-06 INDEPENDENCE NEWARK 137 5.623 7.209 497 525 50,8 70.0 26,866 26,531 56.1 75.3 27.954 27,356 32-07 INDEPENDENCE OIL TROUGH 138 2,847 284 302 21. 1 20,622 23. 6 21,564 32-09 INDEPENDENCE SOUTH SIDE 139 2,295 2,669 972 1,024 62.0 69,121,627 22_,___Q__4,__~6~8_~_- ~75~._5 ~~5\"-'2~2\"-.L..,4~3~4___, _2~3\"'-L~3~32-10 INDEPENDENCE SULPHUR ROCK 140 2,529 2,576 303 321 22.9 23.7 19,575 19~~i~6L9'--~2.-4...... .__,9.,.2,_~ 5~,~1.....,2~0~,~3~3~2,___.2~0u,~3~6~32-11 INDEPENDENCE MIDLAND 141 2,818 2,761 557 598 44.1 43.5 20,838 21,007 47.0 46.4 21,818 22 1012 ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL FISCAi REPORT ANAi YSIS EXPENSE 1989 90 NUMBER OE AVG. SIRY. NO OF CERT. AVG SLRY PER ADA TEACHERS K 12 TCHRS. K-12 PERSONNEL CERT PERS. 89 90 90 9t AID/A AIDIM 09 90 90 91 82 90 90 91 09 90 90-91 82 90 90 91 LEA t COUNil DISTRICT RANK 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 a 9 10 U 12 33-01 IZARD CAI rcn ROCK 142 ? 4?1 2 751 440 465 33 6 34 1 19 O?B ?O 680 36 6 37 1 20 1?0 21 762 33-02 IZARD ____ JM~E~L~BOU.,,,,,~R=N1E4 3 2.375 2.582 471 493 33.4 34.6 20.225 20 000 36.4 37.6 21 459 21 909 --~3 IZARD_ ____ ~M~O-W~N~T~P-L-E-A~S~A~N~I~_1___4 3~~4,~-1-3~~4,-06~~0--24~ 1-5~_ _ 2_8__ 6 __25_.A_ 26.1 21 7!59 21 950 26 6 21 1 \u0026lt;'1 408 21,618 33 06 IZARD IZARD en CONSOL 145 2,573 2 674 494 5?9 38 o 38 6 20 608 ?O 415 41 o 41 6 21 419 21 279 34-02 JACKSON___ GRUBBS 146 2.948 2.979 209 222 19.8 19.3 16 021 17 474 21.0 ?1.3 16 277 18.576 ___ 34-03 JACKSO_N_~-- NEWPOR_T_ ___ ~? 2.356 2.498 2,160 2,264 134.3 133,1 23.563 25.239 142 8 141 6 24 333 26 032 34-04 JACKSON SWIFTON 148 ?.943 3.083 127 209 20,6 ?o o 17 416 10 231 ?2 6 ?2 o 19 239 12 110 34-05 JACKSON JUCKERMAN 149 2,298 2.428 523 552 37.7 36.6 18.2w80,,_\u0026amp;1~a~-~5~9~4c__~ 4~0~u3,uJ79 ~.~6,____.1~2~-~4~0~2._.1L9..._,7~35-01 JEFFERSON ALTHEIMER-SHERRIL150 2,755 2,800 542 574 41.0 41.0 18,584 18,968 44.0 44.0 19.612 19,969_ 35 02 JEFFERSON DOLLARWAY 151 2.587 2,685 1,973 2.004 133.o 13?.o 27 406 23 261 142 5 141 5 ?3 301 24 183 35-05 JEFFERSON PINE BLUFF 152 2 724 2~ _L.__1_64_7~,~5~5~2~-4~4~6~-~424 9.0 25,183 26.374 475.7 480.0 26,064 27,225 35-08 JEFFERSO~ WABBASEKA-TUCKE1R5 3 3.,__Q99 ~~--2~6~5'----2~1~1~--2~1~~5~_~2-1~.6~1~9~,2~11~-1-8~,-8_8~7_ __ 2=4~--2~--2~4~.5 ~ 2~0-,~8-1~1~2~0~,0~5~8~- 35 09 JEFFERSON WATSON CHAPEL 154 2,512 2,726 3.389 J.552 209,6 210.5 25.441 26,461 225 1 226.o 26.493 27.621 35-10 JEFFERSON WHITE HALL 155 2 846 ~~ 2,882 182,0 __ 183~0 24.068 24.153 194.2 194.3 25,024 24.956 36-01 JOHNSON CLARKSVILLE 156 2,312 2,506 ~1~,'--'-4=2~3,__1~-~4~949,35 1.QO_._Q_2 L..390 21.896 99.5 i05.0 36 04 JOHNSON LAHAR 157 2,297 2,451 969 1.025 63,1 64,620,576 21,363 66.6 68,121,342 22,116 22,193 22,726 36-05 JOHNSON DARK 158 3,832 3_,__l_l6 _150 162 _1_7_.2 17~7.934 18.756 19.2 19.2 19,246 1.9..,_979 36-06 JOHNSON WEST SID!\n_ 159 ~548 .2..,_642 ~1 641 ~O 44.5 21,661 21,951 47.0 47.5 22,454 22,760 37 01 LAFAYETTE BRADLEY 160 2.616 2.836 464 492 38 4 37.4 18 136 20 1s1 41 4 40 4 19 998 21 454 37=02 LAFAYETTE LEWISVILLE 161 2_.8. 88 3~ 515 !14.L _38_._6 43,..\nL21,_755 21,342 ~ .2..~. . ,.0'------\"4\". .',.68\u0026lt;-.-,\u0026lt;2.,2 .,,w9~4=4L-\"2~2.._..~5~3~3~ 37=03 LAFAYETTE STAMPS 162 ....2.,_4 63 2,..ll9 868 902 58. ~ 58_._5_2Q_._550_2Q_,_4_9 1 -62....Q ___624---21..,~86 21 . 376.__ 38 01 LAWRENCE BLACK ROCK 163 2,343 2.576 389 410 29,0 29.8 20,769 21 203 32 o 3?.8 21 611 22 101 38-04 LAWRENCE HOXIE 164 2.,_436 ~556 _____f!fj2 9~ ~.__c\n\u0026gt; 60,6 21.999 ~6.4_ 64.1 _____64.82 2,920 23,514 38-05 LAWRENCE LYNN 165 ~47\nL276 __221 233 -21....2 _20.0 20.556 2.0......889- 73.2 22.0 21,330 21,681 38-06 LAWRENCE SLOAN HENDRIX 166 2,647 2.948 498 523 37.o 36 6 22 226 23 226 40 o 39 8 23 491 2S 099 38-07 LAWRENCE STRAWBERRY ii, 7 ~ ~ ----23]' _24L ~ 20, 7 19 ~ ...li,__555 _2~ 22.7 20.4_67_2(L._BQ4_ 38-08 LAWRENCE WALNUTR IDGE 168 2,375 2,432 __8_62_ 913 63.4 ~'L..89fl--2Q.,_709__ .67....A..__ .....6.6..D 20,657 21,489 39 04 LEE MARIANNA 169 2.757 2.793 2.692 40-01 LINCOLN GOULD 1 70 2 460 ~ ~ 40-02 LINCOLN GRADY 171-3.,_0!i7 2.977 302 40 03 LINCOLN STAR CITY 172 2.276 2 ~00 1 467 41-01 LITTLE RIVER ASHDOWN 173 _.?.,_45~ 2,516 2,070 41-02 LITTLE RIVER FOREMAN ---~4 2,726 2,701 593 41-03 LITTLE RIVER WINTHROP 175 3.784 3.751 166 42-01 LOGAN BOONEVILLE 176 2,423 2,521 1,217 ---~4~2~-~2 LOGAN MAGAZINE ---~77 2,634 2,685 448 42 03 LOGAN PARIS 178 2,362 2.629 1,189 42-04 LOGAN SCRANTON 179 2,585 2,571 396 ---~4=3~-...,._01 LON~Oecl\u0026lt;,.,E~--- LONOKE 180 2,326 2, 456 1, 636 43-02 LONOKE ENGLAND 181 2,187 2.386 1,095 43-03 LONOKE CARLISLE 182 2 483 639 69 43-04 LONOKE CABOT ____ 183 2 126 45 4,435 ---43 05 LONOKE HUMNOKE 184 3,721 3.263 169 44-01 MADISON HUNTSVILLE 185 2,392 2 1 480 1,521 44 02 MADISON KINGSTON 186 2 1 689 2,808 292 44-03 MADISON SAINT PAUL 187 2,915 2,966 309 45-01 MARION FLIPPIN 188 2 546 2 671 725 2 889 186,0 178 5 21 579 23 597 201 o 195 o 22 776 24 744 ~-2 ...1..~.. 1.._ . _ ,.2...,.11..~._ _.:..z.1._. .,..=,4_\".'18.~..1,: Zw,c,6~2~2..__~3.,,0., ...~11~.0..1.~. .= _4~~39.,~01,,~_1._-6_~ --6=4'-'1~ 312 .......2.:i,_5_ -20.-...:i...17,105 18,197 28.5 23.5 17,936 19,338 1,524 2.180 620 175 1.306 477 1,263 417 1.714 1.165 7 '5 4,714 180 1,628 309 329 771 89 2 133.6 44.5 14.R 74.4 32,5 ALO 30.4 103.8 74,5 48 1 261.0 20,5 100.3 22.3 25.0 47-0 86.1 21 629 ?3 359 28 o 96 8 22 661 24 366 133, 4 21, 946 ~2..,22~... ._18w.1....=.. .4....._., S_c .o.,.,1.,.1,, 4\"'4'\"'.\"..'09...._ _.9_=.23,\u0026lt;.2-.-,. \u0026lt;2~3,_.,._.1\"\"'4\"'4,.__ 43.6 20.760 21.103 47.5 46.6 21,795 22,126 14.S 20 856 20,981 16 8 16 5 22 466 22 352 74  4 23  040,___,.2-3u,...o 4u_9_c,7..u.,91\u0026lt;._..,, ._.9'-.-. --9'8z....,_0_.9,.2.L ~33.....,,.9,_L, -72..,.._i.=..4,'5~c......L__ 33.S 20.546 20,955 35.5 62 O 22 612 23 465 86 8 28.5 20,687 21.67l5 33.1 103.8 22,425 23.472 110.0 36.!5 21,478 87 8 23 461 30.9 21,869 HO,O 23.281 21,844 24 254 23,163 24.379 73.0 20,631 22,552 79.5 18,021.462 23.596 48_. 1.____,121'\"..1:4..:..,,2_,.\n5 ,.,~.,20.\u0026gt;.,_\u0026lt;2 ..o..c..,1,.. s,. ..1,._1. _,,5,....1..2... 2.. .. u,,1w17 L..1..31. .... ,: :,4\n:L4-i,\"92. ..,9,__ 263.5 23,435 24.697 275.0 277.5 24,224 25,563 16.4 16.126 17.424 22,5 18.4 17 444 18.878 25.3 20.251 21,076 27.5 48.0 22 932 23 082 so.o ARKANSASe UBI IC SCl:!001 PISIRICIS ANl!IIIAEII SCAL REeORI ANALYSIS LEA ORDER eA!.E NO. 7 EXeENSE 1989-90 NUMBERP E AY!.- SLRY. NO. PE CERT. AYI\u0026lt;. eER APA IEACl:IERS K-12 TCl:IBS. K-12 E'ERSONf'!EL 89-90 90-92 Al'.Pl'.A Al'.Pl'M 89-90 90--91 89-90 90-91 89-90 90-91 I EA 0 CPUNI:r: PISIBICT BANK 1 2 3 4 s 6 1 8 9 45 02 MARION YEI I VII I E-S!INNU 289 2 687 2 755 779 831 56,7 sc\n\"'i 21 2651 21,452 59,1 59.5 22 167 2\n'.313 45-03 MARION MARIOl'l co 120 2,830 2,271 222 312 21.2 22.9 21 .164 20,6'Z1 23,2 24,2 22,283 21,7'19 46-01 NII I ER BBI!il:II SIAR 191 2,743 -2.,_'294 245 256 11.0 1:Z.O 22,532 23,604 i9.0 19,0 22,924 2~\\,676 46-02 HI! I EB GENOA CENIBAI 122 2,411 2,675 704 755 49.0 49.3 2i. 122\n:\u0026gt;i.733 51.0 51.3 22.304 22.871 46-03 HILLER EOUKE 123 2.533 2,613 740 76:S :S1,Q ~a.1 21,.!!09 22,313 54.6 54.7 22,386 23,044 46-04 MILLER * !.ARLAND 124 7,307 21 95 13.1 8 5 15.1 1 816 46-05 MIi I ER IEXARKANA 125 ?,76? 5,421 5,802 384.0 381.5 22,797 24,181 409,5 408.0 23,780 25.169 47-01 MISSISSIPPI ABMOREL 196 4,115 2 \"3 2 ., 21.5 21 794 24 960 22.2 23.5 23 060 26 180 47-02 MISSISSIPPI E!LYil:IEYILLE 127 2,6B 4,136 4,400 :ns.1 278.7 23 192 23 6~8 296.6 297.2 24 255 24 730 47-06 HISSISSiee1 1,828 1,920 140,1 135.1 21,5B2 21.809 148.6 143.6 22,548 22.818 47-08 MISSISSIPPI 2 059 2 175 149.5 150.0 24 295 25 575 159.0 159. 5 25 086 26 461 47-12 MISSISSIPPI 862 915 _ 60.6 59.5 21,137 21,366 65.2 64.1 22,167 22,170 47-13 MISSISSIPPI OSCEOLA 2.136 2.266 140.5 144,0 22,182 23,781 149,1 152.3 22,986 24,601 48-01 MONROE BRINKJ....EY 1 286 1 350 86.1 89.1 20 504 20 626 92.1 95.1 21 230 21 321 48-02 MONROE CLARENDON 589 42.0 42.0 19,937 20,045 45.4 45.4 21,194 21,338 48-03 MONROE l:IPLLY !.BOYE 401 28.5 28,5 18.578 19.144 30.5 30.5 19,773 20,269 42-01 MONTGOMERY CADDQ HILLS 514 37.5 38.0 21 552 21 392 40.5 41.0 22 311 22 446 42-02 MONIC.OHERY MOUNT IDA 206 0 36. 37.1 21 573 21 883 39.4 40.1 22 719 23 010 49 04 MONTGOMERY ODEN 201 219 232 18,7 19.5 20,776 20,898 20.7 21.5 21.551 21.643 :10-04 NEVADA EHHET 208 3,228 132 140 12.6 12.9 18,897 19,123 14.6 14.9 20,387 20,578 S0-06 NEVADA PRESCOTT 209 2,592 1,171 1.230 64.5 84.3 20,852 21,224 91.5 91.3 21,752 22,122 :so 08 NEVADA NEVADAC QUNIY 699 739 48,4 47,9 21,372 21,824 51.4 50.9 22,166 22,714\n51-01 NEWTON DEER 335 357 24.5 24.5 20,509 21. 774 26.5 26.5 21,790 22,907 s1-02 NEWTON JASPER 546 577 37.1 36.6 21 580 22 138 40.1 39.6 22 455 22 983 :st-03 NEWTON MOUNT JUDEA 229 246 19,0 19. 1 20,425 21.094 21.0 21.1 21,670 22,322 51-04 NEWTON WESTERN GROVE 262 280 21.2 20.4 20,174 20,248 23.3 22.5 21,154 21,349 :S2 01 OUACl:IIIA BEARDEN 833 865 55,1 55.0 22,327 22,482 60.1 60.0 23,721 23,865 52 02 OLJACHIIA CAMDEN 216 2,619 1 .923 2.021 140.s 142.8 22,791 23,015 158,3 152,6 23.866 24,142 52-04 OUACHIIA FAIRVIEW 217 2.505 2,073 2,170 120.0 119.5 24,599 24,911 129.1 128.6 25,585 25,981 52 05 OUACl:IIIA HARMONGYR OVE 218 2,494 2,692 749 782 47.7 48.4 22,127 22,487 50.7 51.4 23,080 23,440 :S2 06 OUACHIIA STEel:fENS 219 2,764 2.769 sos 525 36.0 35,0 21.866 22.270 39,0 38.0 22,915 23,259 53-01 PERRY EAST END 220 2.802 2,775 480 511 35.8 36.1 20,336 21.093 38. 7 39.0 21,459 22,146 S3-02 PERRY PERRY CASA 221 3,504 3,873 180 193 20.0 21.0 17,576 18,935 22.0 23.0 19,092 20,149 :SJ 03 eEBRY eEBBYVILLE 222 2.490 2,677 785 842 50.1 50.9 21.931 22,439 53.1 53.9 23,006 23,470 S4 01 PHILLIPS BARTON/LEXA 223 2,315 2,622 722 755 44.0 44.0 22,590 23,713 47.0 47.0 23,750 24,882 54-02 PHILLIPS ELAINE 224 2,667 2,679 715 768 51.6 53.0 21.027 21.130 55.6 56.6 21,848 21,958 S4-03 PHILLIPS HELENA-WESTH ELEN225 2,519 2,617 4,231 4,485 291.0 292.0 21,466 22,303 309.0 310,0 22,334 23,293 54 04 Pl:llLLIPS MARVELL 226 2,704 2,701 826 868 59.0 56.0 22,002 22,727 65.0 61.9 23,017 23,699 54-05 PHILLIPS LAKE VIEW 227 2,941 2,649 234 236 19.8 18.3 17,066 17,443 22.0 21.3 18,098 18,802 55 01 PIKE DELIGHT 228 2.776 2,848 385 405 33,5 34,5 19,057 19,119 36,5 37.5 19,656 20,336 55-02 PIKE GLENWOOD 229 2,580 2,633 397 421 31.0 32.0 18,105 18,170 34.0 35.0 19,447 19,470 55-03 PIKE KIRBY 230 2,441 2,471 440 465 34.1 35.8 19,989 18,995 38.1 39.8 20,861 20, 16:5 55-04 PIKE MURFREESBORO 231 2,591 2,808 552 587 43.1 44,2 21,568 21,789 46.1 47.1 22,693 22,927 56-02 POINSETT HARRISBURG ,!32 2,401 2,473 943 1.000 65.5 65.0 20,514 21,337 69.5 69.0 21,186 22,082 56 04 PolNSETT HARKED TREE 233 2.617 2,599 875 938 63.5 64.:5 20,668 20,739 67.5 68.0 21,363 21.411 54 05 POINSETT TRUMANN 234 2,545 2.610 1.601 1,717 113,6 116.2 21,173 21.696 124,5 126.0 22,216 22,6:52 56-07 POINSETT WEINER 235 3,010 3,148 350 370 29.4 30.4 19,997 19,973 31.4 32.4 20,793 20,746 *Includes suhstaoti al bonuses given Drior to the consolidation of the district. LEA COUNTY JU.STRICT ARKANSAS .PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS ANNUAi EISCAI REPORT ANAi YSIS I EA ORDER EXPENSE PER.._ADA_ 1989-90 NUMBER OE TEACHERS K-12 62-90 90 91 AIDIA AIDIH 62 90 90-91 __filllil( ..i__ 2 3 4 5 6 AVG SI RY TCHRS K-12 NO OE CERT PERSONNEi 89 90 90-91 69 90 20 91 7 0 2 iO PAGE NO 8 AVG SIRY CERT PERS 69 90 90-91 H 12 56 OB POINSETT EAST POINSETT COtl236 2 337 2.481 790 B32 57 3 57 a 12 760 21 071 61 3 61 a 20 4?5 ?1 021 57-01 POLK A~ -----2.3:l. 2, ~6_ _2_,_685_ _ _,\n3'-'-5\"'0'-----\"3u6u9L...._~2o..5_. L2~.,5,6.,co,_..,. _..2:., ,_. o.,,0.,._,6,_,. ,0~2,.1~,.e.2_,1 .1,.,z29'-c-_'7_' --_- '~_5.2._::.. c ,00L:i_.._. .2._:\n,._,._.1..5,4.,,..2,4\",'-.7.,._2_\"_'2 \"\"'-'. 57-02 POLK HATFIELD __238 2,848 3.004 282 302 ?4? 23.8 19.516 21 077 26\n\u0026gt; 25,620 254 21 846 57 03 POLK MENA 239 2.530 2 609 615 713 107 o 102 r, 24 526 24 806 114 w, 116 6 25 338 25 628 57-04 POLK VAN COVE 240 3J35---2.,J\nl9J 355 381 32.0 31,512,464 18.787 35.0 34.5 20 5?7 20,097 57-05 POLK WICKES 241 2,35.2___2_._5:iQ_ 479 508 30,8 30.0 21,012 22.342 33 3 32.5 22 221 23.705_ 58-01 POPE ATKINS 242 2.353 2.444 1,035 1,101 68,0 70,023,176 23 216 73 o 75 o 23 2v.o 23 231 58-02 POPE DOVER 243 2,359 2,541 1,082 1,144 66.Q 70.0 23,149 23.522 71.0 75,024.036 24,275 58-03 POPE HECTOR 244 2,505_2_,_?_J_O 632 668 42.5 46.0 22,412 22.424 45.5 49,0 23.2?4 23,122 58 04 POPE POTTSVILLE 245 2,546 2.576 669 102 46,2 47 o 2? 221 23 603 31? r,o o 23 673 24 370 58-05 POPE RUSSELLVILLE 246 2,746-2.,J\n186 4.474 4.727 300,4 302.0 24.694 25.144 319,4 321.0 25.757 26,230 59-01 PRAIRIE DES ARC 247 2,229 ~3 634 670 40.9 41.9 19,929 20,479 44.0 45,020.950 21,295 59 02 PRAIRIE DEYALLS BLUFF 248 2.430 2.653 458 477 33,7 34,912,267 12,664 36 5 37 6 20 356 21 013 59-03 PRAIRIE HAZEN 249 2,256 ~ 55~8._~...,,5~8~1.__~3~6.,_.__,_1 .._3 ,.,_,_9~x0_.1~9~.~9~5~9_..1~9~.~5u9~6.__~3u9u,u1.,__~4~2.._.~o\"-'2-1_. ...._.1~0~6~2-60-01 PULASKI LITTLE ROCK 250 3,416 3,954 ~2L472 24,245 1.809,5 1,838.8 25.211 27.822 1.957.7 1,983.0 26,453 29.303 ___ _.6..,,0c..-_,..0.L \".'.2,A._,_.,,S.P.,_K,.,U.. . I._ ___,NLXOW.L. J. I.R....1 L.\u0026gt;T..T.1..LTH,.L.IE- .-2.o.- R5..1 . .,O~\"3\"cC..,\"''\"K\"Z _. ..,l\"_\"~,l, _3 . 08 3 9 '-z'.= '1c-4,,__~_..6,,0C.L3.0._.\" .'8.u.5.'L-\".'..LO21'- .\u0026lt;4.'.-..3.-. .ul_i3i.68.. _,2...._4. 4'\"~47.. ..._.._.6. .,._ _,5..,_9~9.,...5..~. .0..-..\".'_26-6Lc6, ..-=o1~4~6'-62~6~1=0~9--- 60-03 PULASKI PULASKI COUNTY SP252 3, 112 3 , 2 9 9 ---1Q....l!!l ~  l9l_.1..,,u2...,9c,6,....,~3.9. .1~ .1..,,.0_2.,,..,_., .2_.,.., 65...,,8__..7__. .__. .,.2,3_..,.17.,.,.3_'- --\"'1~,-\"4\"\"1\"'8'-\"._,.0c__.1....,,--=4:S.,,~33,.~33u-,-.,.2__,.2~1~-~61-01 RANDOLPH BIGGERS-REYNO 253 3,051\nLQQO 199 209 18.4 18,520,012 19.351 20,4 20.5 20,922 20.3?1 61 02 RANDOLPH MAYNARD 254 2,582 2 112 480 507 36 1 36 6 20 170 20 122 40 1 41 1 21 048 21 111 61-03 RANDOLPH POCAHONTAS 255 2,153 2..J'.iQ9 717 1,811 101.0 110.0 22.853 24.000 107.0 116,023,641 24,690 61-04 RANDOLPH RANDOLPH COUNTY 256 2,604 2....969 275 294 21.B 23,418.222 18.897 24 8 26 4 12 283 12 988 62 01 ST FRANCIS FORREST CITY 257 2 552 2,630 4.979 5 200 308 3 222 2 22 907 23,071 340 6 332 7 23 9:\n,r, 24 206 62-02 ST FRANCIS HUGHES 258 2,760 2.,_801 L._251_..._1., .._.. _10,_,2 ..____. _7....2.,.a \"_' .1..~. s,...~5._..2_.2...,.\"\"8,.2...,1._.2_,836....1,_ ,6..1.Q_8_3 .4 23.789 24,596 62-05 ST FRANCIS PALESTINE/WHEATLE259 2,745 2.,_803 687 722 47.2 47.0 22,148 22.440 52.2 51.0 23 133 23,355 63-01 SALINE BAUXITE 260 2,565 2.785 601 638 39.0 39.0 23,229 24 437 42 o 4? o 24 487 25 609 63-02 SALINE BENTON 261 2,387 ~ 3,761 3,957 237,5 239.0 23.038 23.917 251.5 254.0 23.939 ?4 843 63-03 SALINE BRYANT 262 2,137 2,\nll2__ 4,803 5,119 277.9 288.1 24.859 25.890 292.1 301.8 25,573 26,587 63-04 SALINE HARMONY GROYE 263 2,402 2 644 523 6?2 31 5 38 r, 2? 110 ?2 942 40 5 41 5 23 37? 24 25? 63-06 SALINE PARON 264 3,784 3.J92- __208_ 221 _.,1~2~-~2~-~1~9J-~4,___.2u1..,.~4u9Ll7L_.._,2 ~21\"L'-,1~~6.,29_\"a '8--.-,,-.. 2.1~.~4'----\"'2~2~.~5~64'-\"2\"'2...,.~7_,.0~8.__ 64-01 SCOTT WALDRON 265 2,715 -2J16 L448 1,548 107.1 109.1 22,025 21.393 113.5 115,222,698 22,130 65 01 SEARCY LESLIE 266 2,459 2,645 295 313 10.1 12,610.232 10 101 21.1 22 6 20 537 20 366 65-02 SEARCY MARSHALL 267 2,441 2~84 712~~ 5(b5_50~-~s.,___.2~0.,_,_,.419L7'---'2~1\"_- -'-\"_,2,.6.5~~33..\"_'\"_~ 5'----~5~3._.,~5,_..2...,1....,.u2...,1~5L--'2~2~.~65-03 SEARCY SAINT JOE 268 3,610\nL593 205 218 1.'L...:i _.1~9~-~51_.,11~9J,~2u1~5.___.1u9~,~5o5o_3_._ _2~~21~\"1-L-'.5~.5..._,._2 .. ,,o6,~.,0_i,9_. ,_2~0~,i9.=,4~3c__ 65 04 SEARCY WITTS SPRINGS 269 4,642 4,862 106 113 14,6 14.6 16 250 18,582 16 6 16 6 12 022 12 626 66-01 SEBASTIAN FORT SMITH 470 3,018 ~o 10,863 11.596 745.4 75B,5,_.2~7u,~0~7~6,_.2~B~-~0~1L9,__7L9~5..i..c.6.,_._s..8~ ...,1 0.. 1\". -~L51'-~\"-2d19-2~ ,_,.ou1~3.__ 66-02 SEBASTIAN GREENWOOD 271 2,376 2.512 2,190 2,298 134.7 141,624,325 24.307 142 7 149.6 25.234 25,207 66 03 SEBASTIAN HACKETT 272 2,462 2,606 509 533 37 5 38 o 20 498 21 742 40 5 41 o 21 450 22,721 66-04 SEBASTIAN HARTFORD 273 2,830 2..J\n!J:l1 441 \"\\7.1_ ~ 36.5 20,437 20.387 39.5 39.6 21,388 21,389 66-05 SEBASTIAN LAVACA 274 2,488 ~ 713 747 52.0 50,520.045 20,623 55.0 53.5 21.114 21,699 66 06 SEBASTIAN MANSFIELD 275 2,424 2,633 865 58,1 58,222 202 22 164 62 1 62 2 23 312 ?3 161 67-01 SEVIER DEQUEEN 276 2,237 ~8 1.428 84,1 _fili._7,_,.2. 2 ......c,8.,3_3~2~4__,_._ ,_,.~_97_~,0.0~~0. ~1 94.2 23,731 25,801 67-03 SEVIER HORATIO 277 2,295 2,353 459 32.0 31.0 20,959 21.896 34.7 33,522,269 23,090 67 04 SEVIER LOCKESBURk 278 2,345 2.502 456 32,5 33,519.620 21.201 35.5 36,520.644 2?.304 ARKANSASP UBLIC SCHOOL Al'fl'fUALE ISCAL REPDRI At,fAL)'.Sl!ii 9 EXPEl',ISE 1989-90 t,fUMBERD E AVG, SLR)'.. t,10. DE CERL AVG. SLR)'.. PER ADA IEACHERS K-12 ICHRS, K-12 PERSQl-ll'IEL CERI. PERS, 89-90 90-91 A/D/A A/D/H 89-90 90-91 89-90 90-91 89-90 90-91 89-90 90-91 LEA  COUl'fTY DIBIRICI RAl'fK 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 8 9 10 u 12 68-06 SHARP PQIJGHKEEPSIE 263 3.404 3.549 125 133 14.9 15.5 17,024 18.003 16.9 17.5 18.156 19.121 69-01 STONE MDUNIAil'f VIEW 284 2.396 2,369 1.010 1,061 64,5 65.5 24,213 23,354 68.0 69,0 25.064 24,196 69-02 STONE STONE COUl'fTY 285 3,409 3,475 201 213 18.5 18.5 19.752 19,670 20.5 20.5 20,441 20.560 69-04 SIONE RIJRAJ SPECIAi 286 2 744 2 711 255 267 17.6 17.6 2'=',140 2?. 168 19.6 19.6 23,291 23,171 70-01 UNION EL DORADO 287 2,579 2.743 4,842 5.113 337.9 338,4 22.516 23.441 359.1 359.1 23,287 24,294 70-02 UNHlN HUTTIG 288 3,334 3,251 278 292 22.0 21.0 22,226 23,259 25.0 23,0 23,317 24.363 70-03 UNION HJNCTION CITY 289 2,442 2,479 877 925 57.1 57.1 23,396 23.596 59.3 59.3 24,433 ?4,626 70-05 UNION MOUNTH OLLY 290 3,755 4,253 230 244 20,8 21.5 22,386 23,932 23.6 24.5 23.851 2:s.201 70-06 UNION l'IORPHLET 291 2,526 2,580 568 593 40.3 41.0 23.103 23,254 43.3 44.0 24,237 24,301 70-07 Ul'fIQN PARKERS CHAPEL 29? 2.529 2.702 581 605 43.2 44.8 21,704 22.183 45,9 47,1 22,414 22,996 70-08 UNION SMACDKY ER 293 2.531 2,659 832 49-1 50,0 23.153 24,348 53.7 54.0 24,351 25.540 70 09 UNION STRDl'IG 42,0 43,0 2i,990 21.851 45,5 46.2 22,869 22.754 70-11 UNION UNIOl'f 25.1 25.1 20,393 21,7:\n9 28.0 28.0 21,643 23.179 71-01 YAl'f BUREi'! ALREAD 9 3 8 391 0 062 15.1 15 .. 2 19 415 21 505 71-02 YAl'f BUREi'! CLINTOl'f 297 2.493 2,545 i,013 1.014 66,9 61,5 22,610 22,732 71.0 72.2 23,313 23,659 71 03 YAN BIJBEl'f scan Al'fD 298 3,406 3,5:53 125 132 13.0 13.5 19,920 20,178 i5.0 15.5 21,187 2i.37i 71-04 YAl'f BUREi'! SHIBLE)'. 299 2,:534 2,857 470 494 33 .. 5 35.5 18,700 21.119 36.5 38.5 19,772 22,300 71-05 YAl'f BUREi'! SOUTH SIDE 300 2,675 2,767 419 440 33,0 32,5 21,134 21,425 35.0 34.5 21,856 22,392 72-01 WASHINGTON ELKINS 301 2.377 2,821 656 695 43,9 45.9 20,669 22,912 46.9 48.9 21,703 23,872 72-02 WASHil'fGTQl'f EARMil-!GIQl'f 302 2,345 2,609 983 1,035 64,5 6!\n!,0 ,U,277 21,308 69.3 72.8 22,200 22,381 __ 72 03 WASHINGTOl'f EAYETTEYILLE 303 2,794 2,865 5,703 6,119 390.3 393.1 25,524 25,773 411.2 415.0 26,215 26,507 7?-04 WASHINGTON GREENAL l'fD 304 2,393 2,746 597 636 40.9 42,9 20.212 20,392 43,9 45,9 21,393 21,488 72-0:S WASHINGTOl',f LINCDLl'f 305 2,566 2,678 926 984 64.0 66.6 21,229 21,394 68.0 70.6 22,234 22,324 72 06 WASHINGTOl'f PRAIRIE GROVE 306 2,542 2,547 993 1,060 63.7 62,5 22,697 22,955 68.2 67.8 23,765 24,010 72-07 WASHINGTON SPRINGDALE 307 2.S89 2,761 6.864 7,376 431,0 438,5 25.486 26,216 464.0 473,5 26.567 27,301 72-08 WASHINGIOl'f WEST EOBK 308 2,492 2,6'.Ui 910 955 61,3 62.4 20,152 20,571 66.3 67.4 21,261 21,630 72:=()9 WASHll' fGTOl'f WINSLOW 309 3,544 3,225 22~ 23fl 20,3 20.0 18,655 18,782 23.1 22.0 19,544 19,676 73-0i WHITE BALD Kl'IOB 310 2,518 2,750 1.295 1,379 84,9 83.9 22.039 23,180 90,9 89.4 22.!\n!26 23,980 73-02 WHITE BEEBE 311 2,237 2,373 1,559 1,651 100.6 102.4 21,117 21,966 107.6 108.7 21,939 22,836 73-03 WHITE BRADEOBD 312 2,555 2,59S 532 ::i65 3e.9 38.7 21,338 21,813 41.9 41.7 22 445 22 920 73-04 WHITE CEl'fIRAJ 2,362 2,483 497 526 35,8 36.3 20.264 21,042 38.6 38.8 21,295 22,009 73-05 WHITE GRIEEITHYILLE 3.728 3,970 164 171 17.1 17.8 19,196 19,425 19.5 20.2 20,348 20,742 73-06 WHITE JUDSONIA 2.488 526 566 37.0 36.5 20,965 21,556 40.0 39.5 22,145 22,784 KENSETT 2,804 469 501 36,0 34.0 22.484 22.878 39,0 37,0 23,797 24,229 5 04 323 25.5 25.1 19 111 20 253 27.5 27.5 20 252 21 2~5 73-09 WHITE PANGBURN 318 2,641 2,762 580 608 41,4 41.8 21,417 22,055 44.9 45.3 22,539 23,537 73 10 WHITE ROSE BUD 319 2,533 2,888 518 549 36.9 37.8 20,786 21,965 39.9 40.8 21,849 23,065 73-11 WHITE SEARCY 320 2,504 2,646 2,e42 3,013 184.0 182.5 23,565 24,562 196.0 196.5 24,635 2:5,447 74-01 WOODRUEE AUGUSTA 321 2,541 2,570 686 722 49.0 46.0 20,837 22,280 52.0 49.0 22,039 23,467 WQQDBUEE COTTON PLANT 322 2,948 2.831 316 336 29.4 28,4 18,032 19,038 32,4 30.9 18,939 19,940 RUEF MCCRORY 323 2,210 2,345 848 891 53.5 53.0 22,149 22,858 57.0 56.5 22,906 23,614 DA VI E 324 2 742 2 647 497 523 38.4 38.6 21 214 21 461 41.3 41.5 22 412 22 604 DARDANELLE 325 2,:526 2.684 1.34i 1.414 86.2 88.8 20.548 2:1..618 92,0 94.8 21,277 22,296 FOURCHE VALLEY 326 4 215 4 968 123 132 17.4 17.6 17 017 21,060 19.4 19.6 18,158 21,924 327 2,499 2,531 4!53 487 35.4 36.3 19,402 19,661 38.4 39.3 20,491 20,710 328 2.451 2.523 347 372 25,9 26,9 17,929 18,080 28.9 29.9 19,157 19,272 N329 2 938 3 051 395 423 35.0 35.0 19 281 19 584 38.0 38.0 20 311 20 607 ARl\u0026lt;ANSASP UBLIC SCHOOLD ISTRICTS ANNUALF ISCAL REPORT ANALYSIS COLUNN 1 RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER PAGE NO. 10 EXPENSE 1989-90 NUl1BER OF AVC. SLRY. NO. OF CERT. AVG. SLRY. -- PER ADA TEACHERS K-12 TCHRS. K-12 PERSONNEL CERT. PERS. .8'1-90 90-91 A/D/A A/D/H 89-90 90-91 89-90 90-91 89-90 90-91 89-90 90-91 LEA  COUNTY DISTRICT RANK I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 I - \"'6-04 HILLER CARLAND 1 7,307 91 95 13.1 28,185 15.1 31,816 ----:21-0iDESHA --- ARKANSAS CITY 2 '5,843 5,942 141 151 17.5 18.2 22,968 22,9:55 20.0 20. 7 25,413 25 273 .s.!-06 INutl\"t:.NDENCE NEWARK 3 !5,623 7,209 497 525 50.8 70.0 26,866 26,531 56.1 75.3 27,954 27,356 03-06 liA~TER TRI-tOUNTY CON. 4 4,646 4,547 164 175 18.7 18.2 20,384 20,769 21.7 20.2 21:765 21,980 65--04 SA~Y WITTS SPRINGS 5 4,642 4,862 106 113 14.6 14.6 18 250 18.582 i6.6 16.6 19 099 19 626 - 31-06 nu-.RD UHPIRE 6 !4,441 4,869 120 125 14.0 15.0 20,079 20,763 17.0 18.0 21,704 22,392 -- 71-01 VANB UREN ALREA~ 7\n4,412 4,914 95 10i 12.9 13.1 18,391 20,062 15.1 i5.2 19,415 21 505 75-05 YELL F~ VALLEY 8 ,4,215 4,968 123 132 17.4 17.6 17,017 21 060 19.4 19.6 18 i58 21 924 36-05 JOHNSON DARK 9 3,832 3,716 150 162 17.2 17.2 17,934 18,756 19.2 19.2 19,2\"'6 19,979 - -41 -~ LITTLE RivtR WINTHROP 10 3,784 3,751 166 175 14.8 14.5 20,856 20,981 16.8 16.5 22,466 22,352 63-06 SALINE PARON 11 3,784 3,792 208 221 19.2 19.4 21,497 21 698 21.2 21. 4 22 564 22 708 70-5 UNION MOUNT HOLLY 12 3,755 4,253 230 244 20.0 21.5 22,386 23,932 23.6 24.5 23,~1 25,201 f .o-v\n:, WM.I. I I:. i.RIH l THVILLE 13 3,728 3,970 164 171 17.1 17.8 19,196 19,425 19.5 20.2 20,348 20,742 -- 43-\u0026lt;= l -'NUil\" Hl.lf'INUKE 14 3,721 3,263 169 180 20.5 16.4 16 126 17,424 22.5 18.4 17 444 18 878 -- 65-03 SEARCY SAINT JOE 15 3,610 3,593 205 218 19.5 19.5 19,215 19,553 21.5 21.5 20,609 20 9-43 72-\u0026lt;\u0026gt;9 WASHIM\u0026gt;TON WINSLOW 16 3,544 3,225 222 238 20.3 20.0 18,655 18,782 23.1 22.0 19,544 19,676 53-02 PERRY PERRY CASA 17 3,504 3,873 180 193 20.0 21.0 17 576 18,935 22.0 23.0 19 092 20 149 47-01 MISSISSIPPI ARHOREL 18 3,-469 4,US 216 231 20.2 21.5 21,794 24,960 22.2 23.5 23,060 26,180 e.u--01 PlLASKI LITTl. ROCK 19 3,416 3,954 22,472 21,782 1,809.5 1,838.8 25,211 27,822 1 957.7 1,983.0 26,453 29 303 69-02 STONE STONE COUNTY 20 3,409 3,475 201 213 18.5 18.5 19 752 19,670 20.5 20.5 20 447 20 560 71-03 VAN BUREN SCOTLAND 21 3,406 3,553 125 132 13.0 13.5 19,920 20,178 15.0 15.5 21,187 21 371 61:1-06 SHARP POUGHKEEPSIE 22 3,404 3,549 125 133 14.9 15.5 17,024 18,003 16.9 17.5 18 156 19,121 23-02 FAUU\u0026lt;NER ENOLA 23 3,382 2,971 133 139 14.9 12.6 16 491 17,S83 16.9 13.6 18,620 19 118 38-05 LAWRENCE LYNN 24 3,347 3,276 221 233 21.2 20.0 20,:556 20,889 23.2 22.0 21,330 21,681 70-02 UNION HUTTIG 25 3,334 3,251 278 292 22.0 21.0 22,226 23,259 25.0 23.0 23,377 24,363 0!!!-04 BOONE UMfV1R 26 3,308 3,398 266 285 23.1 22.9 20,416 20,629 25.9 25.7 21,840 22,109 51-03 NEWTON MOUNT JUDEA 27 3,254 3,384 229 246 19.0 19.1 20,425 21,094 21.0 21.1 21,670 22,322\n:)V--V'f Nl:.VHUH 1:.nnc.1 -\"\"' 3,..:-\u0026gt;0 3,228 132 140 12.6 12.9 18,897 19,123 14.6 14.9 20,387 20,578 22-os DREW WIL\"AR 2'i' 3,236 190 196 20.5 17,036 22.5 18,316 12-v\n:, C'I ~ WILBURN 30 3,235 3,089 160 171 15.5 15.7 17,461 17,949 17.5 17.7 19,728 20,319 ov-v..:. PULA5KI r\u0026lt;ur\u0026lt;IH L.ll 1LE rnA.\" .Sl 3,211 .s,264 9,0B3 9,171 603.5 608.5 24,83:5 24,744 659.9 665.0 26,146 26,109\n.\u0026lt;V--V1 UHl..l..H::\u0026gt; ..\".,.~ ~ 32 3,204 3,422 163 173 17.5 17.5 17,130 19,129 19.5 19.5 19,082 20,494 26-v.o - Hu, SPRINGS 33 3.183 3,216 3,266 3,495 2\"'6.0 239.5 24,044 24,583 262.5 256.0 25,062 25,643\na, 01 1,~1:.1'\u0026lt;1:. DELAPLAu'ft:. .... 3,1..-. 3,117 248 26:5 21.4 21.6 20,740 21,024 24.0 24.2 21,677 21,920 24-05 FRANKLIN Pl~ - T VIEW 35 3,136 3,298 237 251 19.2 21.0 20,001 20,009 21.2 23.0 21,435 21 218 57-04 POLK VAN COVE 36 3,135 2,897 355 381 32.0 31.5 19,464 18,787 35.0 34.5 20,527 20,097 o:,-ol\nBOONE LEAV HILL ,\u0026gt;'\ns, 1.\u0026lt;:'f 3, ..:.:x, \"'\"\"]. ..,... 26.1 :.Z6.3 Lu,035 20,221 28.B ..-:,,.1 21,656 21,756 ov-v.o PULASKI PULASKl 1.,uur,1 T or- .oc, 3,112 3,...,,..., 20,747 21,000 1,L-,,o.9 1,310.2 26,S87 27,313 1,,110.0 1,433.2 27,783 28,5:53 \"'.:\u0026gt; v,, ..,.,., .. c.r,......,,. WA .A JUCKEf\u0026lt; ,\u0026gt;-,, 3,099 2,838 265 277 21.5 21.8 19,917 18,887 24.2 24.5 20,871 20,058 21-03 DESHA DESHA-DREl.l ,ffl .s,v.,. .. 3,lv-,, 10-,, LUU 11.6 11.2 17,YOY 18,097 13.6 13.2 20,515 20,705 ~~- COY-PERRINS \"1 3,v.,.., 3, 1L .. ..: (D ,.,_..,v 22.9 23.9 Lu,431 20,290 25.0 26.0 21,578 21,400 .co O'I - -----ll.LI:. .... , .S, 0l:IB 3, loo ::,52 561 41.5 41.5 23,389 23,441 44.6 44.6 24,573 24,573 ..,... -oo-c:RE~ STANFORD .... 3, \"\"'\" .S,1.:,\n, LVO 216 1Y.B ..:v.0 1s,::118 1'i\",-\"\"'4 ..it:.3 ..:..:.3 l'i\",623 20,134 32-03 INDEPENDENCE cuSRR~ .... .s,064 ... ::,1::, 26::. \"\"\"'' ..:.::.2 23.'i\" 21,170 :21, ... ,3 24.7 26.4 22.492 -\"\"',228 4\u0026amp;:7-V r ~- n- ...., I -r,.., - -- ,_.,...,... . .... .s,uo:i. 201 .!10 16. -, 19,oov 11:1.7 20,413 -.v--v..: LlNCULN .. l'\u0026lt;HUJ \"6 .s,v-1, 2,.,.,, \"'v.:: .S12 ,:\n:, . ::, .:v.::i 17,10::) 1t1,1-,,, ...... s ..:.o.5 17, ....... 1'i',338 - -~COnc.r\u0026lt;1 uuc.n .., 3, V-1.\u0026gt; .. ,.,.vv 21'J' -\"\"'\"\" 11:1.7 1Y.:5 ..:u, r76 -\u0026lt;U,DYa ..:u. 7 21.::, 21,551 21,643 *Includes substantial bonuses given prior to annexation of district. ARKANSAS Pl !Bl re SCHOOi COi IIHN 1 DISTRICTS ANNIIAI FISCAi REPIJRT_Al,,IAU.....,...-2_.._ _______ _ RANKED TN DESCENDING ORDER P~ NO. 11_ ARKANSAS Pl 181 re SCHOOi DISTRICTS ANNUAi FISCAi REPORT ANAi YSXS COi IJMN 1 BANKED IN DESCENDING 08PE8 PAGE NO 12 ARKANSAS PIIBI IC SCHOOi DTSTRTCTS ANNIIAI FISCAi REPORT ANAi YSIS GOIIIMN 1 RANKED TN DESCENDING ORDER PACE NO 13 ARKANSAS PIIBI JC SCHOOi OJSIRJCIS ANNIIAI EISCAI REPORT ANAi YSIS ____________________________ ----1C..iOUJIL..lulcMa.N.N c,.u..K...i.i,E..cr:.ROu.A,_ .._J,.,.E.N :.L1.N1.:0,uicDE.,c.J\u0026lt;.SulNlC0 \u0026lt;GLL...u01DRc..DicEC1:R'-------------- ---- __ :--eAGENiJ---rzi-- 50.7 71.0 137.3 66.3 53.1 ~Q.J. 21,7 145,1 28._9 51.4 72.2 137.4 24_,_25 67.4 21,26 23.00 --- ---- ------------- A8KAliSAlLPUBLIC SCHOOi DISTRICTS ANNIIAI EISCAI REPnRI ANALYSLS COi I !MN RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER P-AGE NO. 15 - No..._OE...cERL.. AVL. SLRY. EERSONJIIEL GERL PERS. -------------------------4--.1:lX.:::xl.L.j...---XlU::.:U..-OlL.LlL..___..LLIJLL,:,1---\"\"'=\u0026gt;CU-----'A.i=\u0026lt;-l.-----\"\"\u0026gt;=:\"-\"---20.=St.1.-. a8-\u0026gt;\u0026lt;9=-c,,9\"'Q'---\"'9\"-Qo.:-,,_9~1--\u0026lt;:8.,,9c:-,-,9u.Q,___,9.,QJ\"-=-:9\"-'66-06 S.EBASUAN 42-01 LOGAN 33-01 lZARJ\u0026gt; 17-02 CRAWFORD 282 2,346 2, :514 2\u0026amp;75 J....22.1.. -1.63..._5 8 51 .10 1.1 12 4B a 50 8 21 403 21.542 59_3 24,433 24,.626 39..13 20,861 20,165 53 s 21 ~,s ~~ 020 64..13 22.,920 23,514 37-.6 .20-,358 21,013 _43_..5 4.3..5 23,-1-16 24,404 .2!51......!5 254-0 23,939 24.843 1291 48...9 21, 703 23,872 142....7 ...149....6. 25.,234 25,207 36 4 21 909 21,489 25,102 ARKANSAS Pl IBI IC SCHOOi DISTRICTS ANNI IAI EISCAI REPORT ANAi. YSIS COi I !MN RANKED TN DFSCENDTNC: ORDER PAGE NO. 16 ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS ANNUAL FISCAL REPORT ANALYSIS COLUMN 2 RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER PAGE NO. 17 1989-90 NUMBER OF AVC. SLRY. NO. OF CERT. AVC. SLRY. TEACHERS l\u0026lt;-12 TCHRS. l\u0026lt;-12 PERSONNEL CERT. PERS. A/DIM 89-90 90-91 89-90 90-91 89-90 90-91 89-90 90- 1 U:A  COUNTY- DISTRICT RANI\u0026lt; 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 H 12 32-06 INDEPENDENCE NEWARK 1 5, 5~ 50.8 70.0 26,866 26,531 56.1 75.3 21-01 DESHA ARKANSAS CITY 2 5, 151 17.5 18.2 22,968 22,955 20.0 20.7 75-05 YELL FOURCHE VALLEY 3 4 132 17.4 17.6 17,017 21,060 19.4 f.9.6 71-01 VAN BUREN ALREAD 4 4 95 101 12.9 f.3.1 18,391 20,062 15.1 15.2 31-06 HOWARD UMPIRE 5 4 120 ___ 125 --14.0 15.0 20,079 20,763 17.0 18.0 65-04 SEARCY WITTS SPRINCS 6 4 106 113 14.6 14.6 18, 0 8, 2 16.6 1 .6 03-06 BAXTER TRI-COUNTY CON. 7 4, 164 175 18.7 f.8.2 :20,384 20,169 21.7 . 70-05 UNION MOUNT HOLLY 8 3, 230--244-- 20.8 21-::-s 22,386 23,932 23.6 25,201 47-01 MISSISSIPPI ARHOREL 9 3, 216 231 20.2 21.5 21,794 24,960 2 .2 23.5 23,0 26,180 73-05 WHITE CRIFFITHVILLE 10 3, 164 171 17.f. 17.8 19,196 19,425 19.5 20.2 20,348 20,742 60-01 PULASKI LITTLE ROCK H 3, 22,472 21,782 1,809.5 1,838.8 25,211 27--\n-0227 , 957. 7 1~983.0 26,453 29,303 53-02 PERRY PERRY CASA 12 3, 180 193 20.0 21.0 17,576 18,935 22.0 2 .o 19,0 2 20, 63-06 SALINE PARON 13 3, 208--221 19.2 19.4 1. 97 21,698 21.2 21.4 22,564 22,708 41-03 LITTLE RIVER WINTHROP 14 3, 166 175 14.8 14.5 20,856 20,981 16.8 16.5 22 466 22 352 36-05 JOHNSON CARI\u0026lt; 15 3, 150 162 17.2 17.2 17,934 18,756 19.2 1 .2 65-03 SEARCY SAINT JOE 16 3, 205--218 1'i'.5 19~5 1'i',21:5 19,553 21.5 2L5 71-03 VAN BUREN SCOTLAND 17 3, 125 132 13.0 13.5 19,920 20,178 15.0 15.5 21,1.8 7 21,3' 71 68-06 SHARP POUGHKEEPSIE 18 3, 125 133 14.9 15.5 17,024 18,003 16.9 1 .5 18,156 9,12 32-03 INDEPENDENCE CUSHMAN 19 3, 265 --287 22.2 23.9 21,170 21,i\n,73 24.7 26.4 22,492 23,228 69-02 STONE STONE COUNTY 20 3, 201 213 18.5 18.5 19,752 19,670 20.5 20.5 20,447 20,560 20-01 DALLAS CARTHACE 21 3,2 163 173 17.5 17.5 17,130 19,129 19.5 19.5 19,082 4 05-04 BOONE OMAHA 22 3, 266 285 23.1 22.9 20,416 20,629 2!5.9 2:5.7 21,1:140 51-03 NEWTON HOUNT JUDEA 23 3,2 229 246 19.0 19.1 20.4~ 21,094--21.0 21.1 21.670 01-02 ARKANSAS GILLETT 24 2,9 281 294 26.5 19,032 19,066 26.9 29.5 2 ,4 27-03 GRANT POYEN 25 2,9 237 250 18.1 22,892 22,787 20.0 20.1 24,1 60-03 PULASKI PULASKI COUNTY SP 26 3,11 20,747 1,310.2 26,587 27,313 1,418.0 1 433.2 27 783 24-05 FRANKLIN PLEASANT VIEW 27 3,13 23 21. 20,001 20, 9 38-05 LAWRENCE LYNN 28 3,34 221 20.0 20,:556 20,81:19 60-02 PULASKI NORTH LITTLE ROCK 29 3,21 9,083 608,524,833 24,744 43-05 LONOKE HUMNOKE 30 3,72 9 05-06 BOONE LEAD HILL 31 3 32{ --~4i 70-02 UNION HUTTIG 32 278 292 66-01 BASTIAN FORT SH 33 50-04 NEVADA EMMEf 34 72-09 WASHINGTON WINSLOW 35 26-03 GARLAND HOT PR NGS 36 49-04 MONTGOMERY ODEN 37 47-08 MISSISSIPPI GOSNELL 38 14-01 COLUHB A EHER 26-04 CARLAN!) JESSIEVILI.E 28-06 GREENE STANFORD 56-07 POINSETT WINER 33-03 IZARD HOUNT PLEASANT 38-07 LAWRENCE STRAWBERRY 23-04 FAULKNR CU -PE K s 28-01 GREEN DELAPLAINE 21-03 DESHA l\u0026gt;E:SHA-l\u0026gt;REW ARKANSAS Pl IRI IC SCHOOi DISTFUCIS ANNI IAI FISCAi REPORT ANAi YSIS cm I !MN 2 RANKED IN DESCEND INC ORDER PACE NO JR __ ARKANSAS PltBI TC SCHOOi DISTRICTS ANNUAi FISCAi REPORT ANAi YSTS COi IIMN 2 RANKED TN DESCENDING ORDER PAGE NO 19 .. COIINTY LEA\n, COl.ltilY 1-4-04 CQLUl'IB1A 46.-.02 MILLER 16-J.3 CRAIGHEAD 4.5::-0.1 MARI.Oli _DISTRICT ARIUlliSAS PUBLIC sr.1-mrn DISTRICTS ANNI IAI FISCAi REPORT ANAi YSIS ~ ? RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDE6\" 1989-90 ~ PAGE NO 20 48-02 MONROE 50-08 NE\\lADA 54-01. PHILLIPS 1.3-04 CLEll.ELAND ARKANSAS Pl IBI JC SCHOOi DISTRICTS ANNI IAI FISCAi RFE'ORT ANAi YSTS COi I !MN 2 RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER PAGE NO 21 _ _ LEA t COUNTY DISTRICT ~-0.1 .LCK.AN l!OOliEY I_LLE__ __.1_6-02-...CBAilHEAD WE.8J S.IDE ~i-0.1 llTT.LE_R.IVER_ .ASHDOWN ARKANSAS Pl !Bl IC SCHOOi PISIRICIS ANNI IAI FISCAi REPORT ANAi YSIS COi IIHN 2 RANKED IN DESCENDING......IJRDER__ .-26-0:5 ~ I.AKE__ HAM..IL.ION 73~ITE _ __..,8...::-::,G,0R7E ENE 44-01 HAD=SDN~--- F'AGE NO 22 ___ _ I EA 0 ARKANSAS PllBI IC SCHOOi DISTEUCTS ANNllAI FISCAi REPORT ANAi YSIS COLIIMN 2 RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER PAGE NO23 ARKAl\u0026gt;ISAS Pl IBI IC SCHOOi DISIRICIS Ablbli lAI FISCAi REPORT AblAI YSIS COi 11Mbl 3 RAl\u0026gt;IKED Ibl DESCEblDiblG ORDER PAGE blO 24 ~l,ISAS_ Pl fBf IC SCHOOi DISIRICIS ANNI IAI EISC~LREeORL Al\u0026gt;IAL.YSJS _c()LLJMllL3_ RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDF\".R PISIRICI RANK .LEA__._ COi INTY 32-09 --1W)EPEHDENCE 4.-03- llENIQN___ DISTRICT SOUTH lllDEGENIRY ARKANSAS Pi 191 IC SCHOOL -lUSJ:f\n-JCTS ANN! IAI FTSCAL..REPORT ANAi YSil'l COi i lHN 3 RANKED IN DESCENDING O6\"DER-RANK ---~3 .. 6.. -=0~4 -~.:\u0026gt;1.Jllll... ____ ..J..ecl8tl'---------1='--~..,,:\n.'i.I._-'-\u0026gt;.$:U..~__:u,.:z'._..._.1,u.\nL__....1:\u0026gt;.~..1.... _ _/.:i!I.....0.......::1.L..::U::tt.......:.JL...,.1.CL~-_QtJ:t.....Q.. _ __Jl:ll\nl....J.---\"':l.....-i.a:.....:,,:,..:.....\nu.J:1.... 09-02 CH.I.CCI. -56-02 J\u0026gt;OXNSEII. ----- --------------------------------------------------------------- LEA COUMIY 7Q-09 UNION 51-02. l'IEWillli.__ 12-Q3.__CLE1URNL DIS.TIUCT ARlLJlliSAS _f'LJBLIC SCHOOi DISTRICTS ANNI iAi FISCAi REPORT ANALYSIS 0LUMN 3 RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER ---- ---l\"Pc..,A .G. e,EN uo___..2 ~7 _ .ARKAhlSAS. PUBLIC SCHOOL DI.SIRlCIS-AblNLIAL FISCAi REEORT .ANALYSIEL COLI.JHl\u0026gt;L.3 RAblKED IN PESCFNOING ORDER PAGE NO 28 _ __._c..,..._..,,.,____._c..u011Jll,aNu.I..1.Y_ 32-10 INDEPENDENCE 40-02 LINCOLN. 29-0:S HEMPSTEAD 32-07 INDEPENDENCE 01-02 ARKANSAS 10-01 CLARI\u0026lt; 70-02 UNlQN 33-03 lZARD HEMPSTEAD GRANT BOONE INDEPENDENCE. 35-0.8 JEFFERSON -51=04 . .NEWION. 68-05 SHARP ~ PUBLIC SCHOOL-1lISIRICIS ANNI IA FISCAi REP.DEU ANA YSIS COl..Ut1N 3 Rl\\NllED IN DESCFNil.ING DRDER... DISTRICT SARATOGA 267 2-1,689 2,857 284 298 23.8 24.8 18,li7 .i.8,996 OIL TROUGH 268 2,847 284 302 21.1 20,622 GlLLETT 270 2,906 3,3:57 281 294 24.3 26.!5 19,032 .19~.066 AMITY 271. 2,823 2,920 278 295 21.8 2Li 20,-2,U 20,979 HUTTIG 273 3,334 3,251. 278 292 22.0 2i.O 22,226 -23 .259 MOUNTP LEASANT 274 3,004 3,146 275 286 2!5.6 26  .i 21. 759 2i+950 267 283 17.0 OMAHA 278 CUSHMAN 279  :5 265 2El7 22 ...2 23.9 2.L .1.70 -2.L..973 WABBASEKA-TUCK2E8R0 2_, 1338 265 -277 21.5 21.8 19,9.17 iB,8.87 WESIEfi:hl Gfi:QllE 28! 2. 4 20 j74 ?O 7~8 WILLIFORD 282 2,907 3,000 261 280 22.0 23.0 iB,84.0 iB,869 PAG\nE NO 29 - 26..3 Z:Z.3-20,028 20,267 ---ZL.o 21,,564 26.9 29---5 20,442 20,444 ZL.9 23....2 22,056 22 .. i22 \"'6 0 2l 5:ZB 2l 400 --25--0 23.0 --23,377 24,363 26.6 27--1-21,.408 21,618 24.7... 26.4 22,492 23,228 24.2 24...5. 20,87i 20,058 \"3 3 \"2 5 ?j i5~ '\n)j 349 - ~-5. 25.:S .1.9 ,87i 19,956 ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL lUSIRICTS ANNI IAI FISCAi BEPJJR:L .A. NAL'lSI..S ...cou.JMN 3.- RANK.El)_ ..IN......DESCE ...QRDER... LFA c\nCOillilY 60-Qi Plll ASKI 60-03 PLJJ..ASK.I 66.-0i. SEBASllAl!L 60 02 PIii ASKI 35-0!5. JEFFERSOl'i- 72.-07 WASHING.TON i.8-03 CRITTENDEN 72.-03 WASHINGTON ARKANSAS Pl 181 IC SCHOOi DISTRICTS ANNI IAI FISCAi REPORT ANAi YSIS COIIIMN 4 RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER I ITT! E ROCK 1 euL.ASIU COIJNIY se -2- FORT SM.ITH -3 NORTH I TTTI E ROCK P.I.NE_ BLUFF SPJUNGDALE PAr\nE MJ3l __ _ LEA~ .COUNTY .16-11. CRAIGHEAD 23-07 FAULKNER 40-03 LINCOLN 23-03 F_ilULKNER 36-01 JOHNSON. 01-0.1 ARKANSAS 24-04 FRAN.KLIN. 73-01 WHITE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCl-mOL DISTRICTS ANNUAL.-f:ISCAL.- f\u0026lt;EP-OR+ -ANAL.-SXS. COUJt1N- 4 RANl(X)_ Il\u0026gt;l--CSCENDINi\nOfWER MJHBER OF D1STfUCT 9!1 ...2.,J)B..1. Pl lBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS ANNUAL FISCAL REPORT ANALYSIS COLI IHN 4 RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER PAGE: NO  __ ARKANSAS p1 IBI IC SCHOOi DISTRICTS ANNIIAI FISCAi REPORT ANAi YSJS COi IIMN 4 RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER PAGE NO 35 .ARKAtlSAS .J?illlLIC ...SCI-IDOi DISTRICTS _,.Au,Nu\nulA,Nw1.1L.l. -tFc.1I~S~C,\n,A\ni1.L..-lR~E\n.1PcC10.11R,c.T1-\u0026lt;A~N~A~LL.-Y:r.\nS:\n,i,\nIS::\n_---------------:-:---- .cou.JMN 4-RANKED IN DESCENDIN~ ORDER PA\nE NO 3=6_ _ LEA~ _cnuN]\"'( .IUSIRICI 29-0.1. HEMPSTEAD 42-04 LOGAN 1.3-0.1. 55-0.1. 3Q-Q5 .1..4-0.1. 15-03 57-04 POLK 75-08 YELL 111111111111111 I I I I L EA  _...,c..,OuullDNuT...,Yc_ --ARl\u0026lt;'ANSAS Pl IBLIC SCHOOi DISTRICTS ANNI IAI FISCAL REPOr'T CQI I !MN 5 RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER DISTRICT PAGE NO 39 -LEA-$ COIINTY --21=02 _\\/AN --BURtL _sa-02 P.0\u0026gt;.E ---1..0=03...CLARK -..04-=-0A BENT.ml DISTRICT EUDOAA ATKDIS 40 ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS ANNI/Al FISCAL BeORI ANAi YSIS COLJJMN----5_ RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER PAGE NO. 4l LEA- .$. .couNTY 33-06..UARD. --3 -05-JACKSQN_ 23-.1,0 JJHIIE. 03-02. .l3AlCTER. A9-02JENILOMER't -59\"'3. PRAI.RIE,_ 52-M OUAClilTA 23-07 _)JHU DISTRICT ARKANSAS- PJJBLIC SCHOOL. ..J\u0026gt;LSTfUCTS ~ ElSCAL REP.run ANALYSIS COLUMN 5- ~ IN .DSCENDil\u0026gt;IG ORDER XPENSE .i,982-9.0 NlJMBER_ OF A\\JG. SLR.- f.'ER ADA TEACHERS X-1.2 TCHRS.. K-i2 85'-90 S'0-91 AIDIA All)I~ 89-9 I 89-90 90-91 RANK. 1. 2. 3 A 't 5 7 a NO- OF CERT. PERSONNEL 89-90 90-91 9 ...1.0 PAGE- N0.42 AVG. SLRY  CERT. PERS. 89-90 90-91 LEA t COUNTY .lll.STRICT ARKANSAS fUBLIC SCHOOL DIST~ EISCAl- REeORT ANAi YSIS COWMN .5 RANKD-I.N ~R ___ t~4,,0. 4 Cot I INBIA -- --...U.UJ...ut\u0026lt;------\"\"\"'\"'-__...~.,_,.,_..,,.,_-0-J.-0----'._,.,--~--+-----~..\n,.t--\"'...u.--J.u..,.~+-:.p.,\n'-r-CI..._,. __ ~,-\n\u0026gt;----'-'\"-',-\n.\"\"-~\"'-- .... ~_,._.__ 40.-0i LINCOLN_ 13-01. CLEVELAND_ 24-01 FRANKi IN 21-02 DESHA 05--06. BOONE 2c:\n-oe YFt I 33-03 IZARD 14-03 COLUMBIA. 40-02 I JNCOI N 57-01 POLK 73-08 WHITE 44-03 MADISON 51.-01 .NEl,ITON 57-02- POLK 29-05 HEMPSTEAD ACOf\u0026lt;N_ MCRAE. ARKANSAS UBL.IC SCHOOL- I).1Sl'.JUC1'.S ~ .f\"-ISCAI..- .REPOR.T ANAL.'t'SIS COLUMN S RANl(l)_ IN DESCENDING ORDER EXPNSE J.$189-90- NUmlER- OF AllG- ~- RER ADA TACHERS J\u0026lt;--.12 TO!RS.. K-i.2- --------------~ -~------~8~9~=~9~01--49~0~-~9~11,..--~A~t~I)~t~A1--~A~l~D~l~M\"-+t~a~9~-~~99~~00uJ.-=~9l~ 11-__JS~9~9~09u0. 91 t.EA 4:- COUN'.f't DIS'.TRIC.X RANK- 1- -2- 3- 4.- t !5. 6- 7 A \"3-05 LOblOKE. 72=09 .I.IASHINGTON 53-02- P.ERR'I' 28-06 GREENE. blO- OF CERTP. ERSONNEL SSZ SZO SZ0-9l .9 iO All.!.- SlR'l'. c:ERI:- P8S.. 89-90 90 91 il 12 LEA COllNTX 60,01 PIii ASICI 60-03 Pl II ASK I DISTRICT I ITT! E ROCK ARKANSAS Pl 1B1 IC SCHOOi DISTRICTS ANNI IAI FISCAi REPORT ANAi XSIS COi I IMN 6 RANKED TN DESCENDING ORDER Pl JI ASK I COi lNTY- SP _,:,__.,_._ FORT Sl'I T T-H-HARTON MONTICFII 0 PAGE NO 45 ~KANSAS PUBLIC. SCHOOL DISTf\nICTS ANNI IAL FISCAL-REPORT ANALYSIS COLUHN----6 .RANKD---.IN .DESCEND-UU\nORDER .LEA ._ COUNTY -IlISllUCT RANK 47-06 --lilSSJ:Slllf'e.L SO filSSI.SSIPP.I 41-01 LITTLE.-!U\\I.ER -ASHDOWN ____ 3,.4.,-.,.,3.. o:, _..,1A...1, u\u0026lt;Co uS\n:,,Ou.N-----ANc.E,~,.,1pmu- -------!i.1.--_.:\n~~r,_..-2,..4!\n!8-___\n2-,..,u.~---2.,..24,4_-4~..,.\ni.+------4~1-,...,1,_j,.~~.\nJ_-2:\n.,.:\ni.ijl-_j.-4\n:\ni.._\nli--.1.4~\"---.:\ni4,..:J.\nJ\ni......:\nt4,.,.o\n,hl---- 04-06. ..BENTON -5ILOAH SPRINGS 35-02 .JEFFRSON -IlOU..ARIJAY -1.2::02.J:LEBU_ HEBER SP.R1hlGS 40-03 LJ:.NCOLN _sTAfLCllY 11 ~ I~ I EA 29 01 HEMPSTEAD 62-03 SEVIER ...1k-!U.. COi I IHBIA -ARKANSAS PIIBI IC SCHOOi COLIIMN 6 DISTRICT DISTRICTS ANNUAi FISCAi RFP06'T ANAi YSJS RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER PAGE NO 4L __ _ ARKANSAS Pl IBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS ANNUAL FISCAL REPOl\u0026lt;T ANALYSIS --CC\ntO11.L~IJlil1!UN\u0026gt;l-\u0026lt;6f\u0026gt;---lR~A~NIIIKiC-IEI.IDD-I1\"NN-DD-EESSC~ENN.pD-LINN~c\n-1:io1J,R:llDll:EJiR:..------------------i\"PAA~NcQ\nE.. -.5P_ - 111111111 111 111111111111111 I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I ' I ' ' I ' ' I ' I I I ' I I I ~ Pl IBI IC SCHOOi DISTRICTS ANNI IAI FISCAi RFPO6'T ANAi YSIS COi IIMN 7 RANKED TN DESCENDING ORDER PAGE NO 52 *TocJ11des s11hstaotial ham1ses given prior ta the consolidation of. ~h-~distri~c=~------------------------------------- I FA C041NTY 62-02 ST FRANC.Ia i.6=-12__CRAIGHFAD_ 46-0:S HI! LFR 52=02 OUACl:Uia 72-06 WASHINkTOl'L 04--.06 JlFNTlltL 52-fil_ 01.JACH.IIA l\u0026gt;ISTRICT ARKANSAS Pl IBL IC C::CHOOL l\u0026gt;ISTRICTS ANNUAi FISCAL REPOJ\nT ANALYSIS ~ IN l\u0026gt;ESCENl\u0026gt;IN~ ORl\u0026gt;ER 1989 90 8.33 86.5 -55-...i PAC\nE NO S3 I I I I I .IilSTJUCL ---42--~ ---55-.0AJ\u0026gt;JKE-A6\" KANSAS P-UBLI.C-SCHOOL-DISl\"-fHCT\"l ANNI IAL FISCAL ~ -AWAL-S-I-S-- COUJMN 7 AANKED--IU DESCENDIN~ ORDER pA(\nF N0.55 _ ARKANSAS Pi !BL.IC SCHOOL. DISTRICTS ANN! !AL. FISCAi REPORT ANAL.YSIS --COl...lJHU 7--RANKED IN DESCENDIN~ ORDER PAGE NO 56 I..EA-4 .couNPI DISTRICT J.9-03 CROSS 29-07 HEMPSTEAD 03 04 BAXTER H-06 CLAY 67-0-4 SEVIER 31 04 HOWARD 32-10 INDEPENDENCE_ J.3-0-4 CLEVELAND 75-.09 YELL 59-02 PRAIRIE. ___ 6~-03 SEARCY 73 05 WHITE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL- DISTIUCTS ANNI IAL. FISCAL. FEf'OR:r ANAL.YSlS COI...Ul'1N -4 RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER 1989-90 -1..2....5 PAGE NO.sz AVG SL.RY CERT. Plii:Rlii -LEA- .0. COUNTY DISTRICT AAl\u0026lt;Al\u0026gt;ISAS PUBLIC SCHOOi.- DISTRICTS ANNUAL. f:\"ISCAL. REPOR:r ANAL'l'SIS ~MN 7 -RANK\u0026amp;l\u0026gt;- lt,j DSCENI)J\nNt\n. -lmOER EXPENSE 1989-90 NlJt1BEr,\nPER ADA lil'i' i\nt(j 'i'O 'i'l A ti) IA A II) 1'4 RANK 1- 2 3 4 s ~s 07 bAWRENl~Ce~----~6HT~R~A~UHB~E~R~R~Y1------.!l~:-\n!-li-l\ni ...,:\n.i' . '_i'_\nii_!, ,.--'Nic-- .:.\n.i.\nn~ -~1-4-\u0026lt;r:-\n-i-4-7-1 i.....\u0026amp;-----.\u0026amp;\u0026lt;~-1+-.,.,1,-.,.i----,-\n,\n,~-._\n,j ........ -_\n.i..,.-,...~---,-.:,\"4\u0026gt;-...,.. __ _ 73..0S. WHITE ttcRAE- :5!5-01- -PIKE U:Ll.(.HT 01 02 ARKANSAS CZLLTT 18-01 CRUu:NDEN- CRAWF..oRDS\\/!.LLE 33-01 .IZARD- CAU:C0 ROCK 04-02 :BENTON 4a-oi MONROE 28--e.06 t.REENE 71-01 \\!AN Bllfi:EN 1'I 07 .cou.JMBIA 23.-06 .FAULKNER 2.,..552- 304- 323 44 () 30 ...5 226-3 44 0 19 61'\") 19,969 30.5 --1.9+ 773 20-#269 22.3 J.9+623 20,i.34 '\u0026gt;j E:jQte\n24.0 --1.9,988 20,059 2L7 J.9+!540 i.9,946 39 6 19 40? LEA Ca COUNTY 66-01 SEIIAS'.fIAN-'- 0-0i PULASKI ,o 0~ FULAliil\u0026lt; I 27-04 \u0026lt;.RANT -32-06 lNDEPNDENCE- 35-05 JEFFERSON 72-07 WASHINGTON 63 ...0 3 SALINE 72-03 WASIUNGTON j,6-0S. CRAIGHEAD 47-0e MISSISSIPPI :U-05 GARLAND 32-.0i .INDEPENDENCE. 04=0:5 EIENTON 34-03 JACKSON 58-05 POP-E J.8-03 CRITTENDEN 17-05 CRAWFOF\u0026lt;D 47,0i MISSISSIPPI 23--03 FAULKNER. 52-04 OUACHLTA ::S7r03 POLI\u0026lt; 30-02- HOl\" S1,RiNG '-0-02 PULASK.I '701 t.EVIER 43-04-LONOK --21-.04 .l)SHA. ~TRICT FORT SHI-TH L:tTTLE~OCK ARKANSASP UBLIC SCHOOi..- l)IS+..,R.I. \u0026lt; -C-\u0026gt;-T~S--H\"\"\"'u...'-COLUMN a. RANKEl\u0026gt;-,1,.I~N-jJ=y_. J:'UL.AliilI\u0026lt; COYITY lii~ PRATTSVILLE NEWARK f'INE.. BLUFF Sl?RINGDALE llRYANT FAYETTE'.\\IILLE JONESBORO (\n05NELL LAKE- HAMIL TON BATESV.I LI..E. ROIOER .NEWPORT f,USSE:LLVILLE. WEST HEMF'HIS VAN :SUREN pcHOREL $\\NALYSIS LEA C COUNT 38=06 L.A1JRENCS: 63 02 SALINE 04 06 BENTON ..U,,,U. MISSISSIPPI 54-0i PlUl.LIPS. .07-0i- CALHOUN. QS.,-.OS. .B001'IE- - 47-02 MISSISSIPPI. 62.-02- ST FRANCIS 46-01 MIi I ER 58-04 POPE. 39-04 LEE 02--Di ASHLEY 58-02 P0P.E 17-01 CRAWFORD 28-03 ,!\nREEN 42--0i LO,!\nAN 42-03 LO,!\nAN .14-0i COUJMBlA 26-04 GARLAND. 05-02 BOOblE. 03-03 BAXT.ER 40-03 LINCOLN -ARKANSAS f.'UBUC- SCHOOL lUSUU.CU. Al\u0026gt;INUAL .f\" ISCAL- ~EP..Qf.::f ~ llISTR.tCT S10Al\u0026gt;I-MENllRIX .BENION. SZLOAl'I SE'R-UICS OSCEOLA BAAlOl\u0026gt;l.lLEXA~ TON .\\tAL.L.EY SPRil\u0026gt;IGS BLYTHE.VIllE. HUGHES MAR11ADUKE BOONEVILLE.. MOUNTAIN HOl1E STAR CU -42- 49. -COUJHN S RANKED U1- l\u0026gt;ESCENOINl\n- -Or\u0026lt;~ so 2,421 Sj,~ 52- 2,315 S3 2,::a.o 2,484 Lli:A  CQUMTY AAl\u0026lt;ANli\u0026gt;AS PUBL~C ~ l\u0026gt;lliTRICTS ANNUAL i:::IS.CAL REl\"'ORT ANALYSIS ~- -8  RMll\u0026lt;ED IM DESGI.Nl\u0026gt;ING-~ l).ISTRJ:CT t,IASHl,lll.U: TUJ\nRELL HIINTSVILLE !iOl.JNTA.UIBt..lRGALPENA 1989 90 J\u0026gt;ACE NO 6l LEA c, COUNTY 22m02 DREW 01-01 ARKANSAS 73-09 -WHITE -~i2..Qi..-CLEl.ll.!RNE- 30-04 HOT SPRINC\n32-03 UIDEPNDENCE ~3 02 !JHITE 7.3-10 WHITE 36-06 JOHNSON --- ---33-03 IZARD 26-07 GARLAND 36-01 JOHNSON 49-02 MONTGOMERY -1.2-02 CLEBURNE. 23-0'5 EAi II ICNER 08-03 CARROLL 70-09 UNION 70-11 UNION 01-05 ARKANSAS 66-03 SEBASTIAN 46-02 MILLER --63-06 SALINE 49-0L HONT_GOMERY ARKANSAS PUBUC SCHOOL l)ISTRl~ -FISCAL ~f'OR-T-4\\NAb'l'SIS COLI.INN S AA/111(1) -IN DliCENl)IHG----Qf(PER WSTRICT RANK D~EW CENTRAL --~\ni_~~,0-__...-4'p:\ni._--~16G'----'~~-~...-9------\u0026lt;!,9..,4---i!i!,.-aOO~M\u0026gt;6\u0026lt;!.--j--6+r-9----'ig..-6---zra-~~-2i!~-46-DEWITT fANGBURN --CONCOROliALVERN CUSnMAN IIEEBE-ROSE BUD WEST SIDE HO! !NT Pl EASAN MOUNTAIN PINE CLARKSVILLE MOUNT IDA HEBER SPRINGS HAYE! OIJER GREEN FOREST STRONG UNI.ON HUMPHREY HACKETT GENOA. CENTRAL F'ARON 3,06-4 3,515\ni, 2:17\ni, :17:J 2,533 2.,888 2,548 2,.642 ! lp f~ it I nil~ .. .. . . . .. . . .. .. .. ....r rf LEA 4- .couNTY 72-04 ~4SHDl~TON 66-04 SEBASTIAN 23-04 FP1 II Kl\u0026gt;!Ef\n: 73-08 WHITE i9-03 CROSS i9-0i CRQSS __ _ 6.9-02-..ST(ll,IE_ _ 29 06 75-07 J..3-0i J..J..LJIU::JL..8llil SCMOOL.-l)l~+S- Al#IIJAI.. F..lSGAb-~ AAAb_Sl-SC01.. UMN. S RANKED- :tH- P6SC91~ ORDER PAG\u0026amp; -NO-. ~ ARKANSAS PIISI.IC SCHOOi. DISTIO:ICTS ANNIIAI. FISCAi. REPORT ANALYSIS COi.i iNN El RANKED IN DESCENDIN\u0026lt;\nORDER PAGE NO GS 1989-90 --34-03 IACl\u0026lt;SON 66-07 SEBASTIAN-ARKANSAS Pl IBI IC SCHOJ.10J.11-.rD. .. RU. :-.J.C..I. I\n..s,T c,.S..N, _,.,..AN ls ,.AI. '-L--\"F..1I.,:.S.1 ,\u0026lt;--C\u0026lt;R,1eAc 1E=P~O.~.N .P. A .\n.. L .,-TY_,-,\n.SAS= a\u0026gt;.J-.-.-I- - ------- COL t MN~S!'--..-R~AU\u0026gt;Nuol(\n.cE\n...,E.1 a.D::\u0026gt;S-:J\u0026gt;I1LC-t.N.1~EDa .1N.. R.1. D\u0026lt;D1,i1,,,IE.,Ni:.'Rl'c--\n-..-.-.-.-.-.,-o-- f'Al\nii\nN0.67 _ CO!INTY DISTIUCT 0 4 0~ ill,\nITOI IO liITRY i. lil-02 -CIU-+T+.ET... N ... ,o.E. . N.. e------sE .A... R... L... n0.E -.SS-Oi l?OPE AT-Kuis SS-,02 POPt\n, 7i.-,02 llAN WREbl 9-...Qi. CROSS --..U-J.2 HIS9ISSIPPJ: :54-04 PMIL.L.IPS l)Ol,IER CLLNUlN ARl\u0026lt;-ANSAS-PUa...IC SCHOOL DISTRICTc ANNI IAL. FI\"'CAL. l\"'EPOl\"'T ANAL.YSIS COL.I IMN 9 RANl\u0026lt;li:D IN DEliiCENDINIO ORDli:R i.91i19-90 PAGE NO 68 I EA 0 COIJNTY 52 01 PRAIRIE 7.2=0A-WASHINGTQN COi IIMBTA DISTRICT ARKANSAS Pl IBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS ANNI IAL FISCAL REPORT ANALYSIS ----COUJl'IN--5 RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER PAC\nEN069 COtlNTY .1.2-04 Cl EBt IRNE 03-04 -BAXTER-ARKANSAS PtJBl....IC-SCHO DISTF'ICTS ANNUAL FISCAL ~E:F!OR'f -ANAl..8-IS -COLUl'IN 9 R~DE..scc\nNDIM\n..oRDER DISTRICT .G..Il..l.E.U MOUN.T Pl EASo\\NT DEER -SARATOGA ..!-la TF-IELD \\lEN.J' NG SHADE LU-PERKDIS- -XPENSE: 1989 90 PER-~ NUMBER-Ole TEACHERS-K-1-2 \".\u0026gt; ?Q 8 ~ N0-.71- AVG, SL-RV. .l-\"F.:RS. 90 91 12 L.f:A...- COIINTY -ARKANSAS Pl IBLIC SCHOOi DISTRICTS ANNI IAL FISCAL REP06'T ANAi XSIS ~ RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER 1969-90 0 I STRICT ~K-PAC- MJ 7Z I EA 0 C011NTY PlSTRlCT ARKANSAS PUBLIC SC~OOL PlliTl\u0026lt;ICTS ANNUAL.. FISCAL REPOIH ANAL'\\'~ COLUMN 10----R~-DESC6NP-I-NG--OROER RANK --41.-01 LITTLE RIVER- 9 2~ -~1'.0N-- SILOAM SPR~ -SO- --2-,--4:\n?~ii-,9\"\"8,._-h!,,...,,_..,..__ ----\"'14'47-Q0'6,-M-.15Ui...iUw:ilil111-I\"\"P-\"P\"\"l'-----llilM0~M~l.iililt11liiNl~lilt11l,i.i8h:l.l....--P--:-.--:PM:~..\u0026gt;,,-X-1---~,-:Si-\n.!1S---:-\n,ii ,-9'20~---i-40-.-4----\u0026amp;-\ni5,.--1------2-JM\u0026gt;S\n!-s14-,-8':'9--4-48-r,H-i-4\n..,6H22-~,m.~~Hcl:~- 34 03 IACK SON-- NE1~PORT 2, 498 2, 160~ 35-02 IEFFERSON DOLLARl,IA't- 53 -2.3-03J.AJ.JLKNR_ -2.4-0~ -1..6.-02. ...cruuc.HEAD ...42._-.03-1-0GAfL _()8_-QL.CARROLL__ 21-0S DESHA ___ 62_-02_Sj ffiANC.I.6._ ~O.L.LOGJlli --1.8-02-CRIII.EliD.EN _r.REENBRJER OZARIL _FARIS ____BERRYI/.ILLE ---9 4... 2.,_ 9 i 9 ...2..J 42 .L..0.02. ---1..,.0.69 -62...Jl ----23...2 76.7 .25_,..543 23,843 ARKANSAS Pl IBL.lC SCHOOL. 01sn1cTs ANNI IAL FISCAL REPORT . .ANAL:tSIS. COL.UMN 10 RANl\u0026lt;ED IN DESCENDIN~ ORDER --P-AI.E NO 75 ARKANSAS F'i !BL.IC SCHOOL. l)ISTi::ICTS AM~li iAL. FISCAL. i\n:i.:i\noi\n:T ANALYSIS COi i il'IN 10 RANKE]) IN l)E$Ciii\nNDING ORDEI-' F\"ACE ~10 76 i..EA_._ COUN\"IX- 68-03 SHARI\" 57-02 POLK 44-02. MADISON 40-02 LINCOLN 02-02. ASHLEY MAN BANDOLPH -COUNU'GI IY-PFRt\u0026lt; I NS EVENING SHADE -HATFIELD KINGSTCN GRADY FOUlilAIN HILL ,, ,, 279 2,689 280 3,057 282 3,013 ANAL..YSIS At:\nSL.RY SL.RY. 248 \"\" ,., F. ,, 0oe 292 309 22.3 ,977 .302 312 25--5 ., 3,099 234 248 21..2 60-()j, PULASKI 72-03 -WASHUU\nTON ,o 0~ PIILAli DISTRICT -BL YTHEVII IE NORPHI EI ARKANSAS F'-U8l.--IC~ Wrnl'.S +\\Nl\u0026gt;IUAl... ~-XSCAI..--R~ ANALYSIS COLUNN-- ,U -RANt\u0026lt;.l)_~i\n:!iCl.~IDU-1(\nOJ\n:DEf\n' li:ANK substantial bonuses given prior to the consolidation of the district. ~ 4::1 Oi L.ONOKli: DISTRICT ARKAMSAS PUBLIC SCMOOL. DISTF\u0026lt;ICTS ANNUAL. i\n:ISCAL. REPOJ\nT ANALYSIS --Gt\u0026gt;bUMN-11 RAIKEP IM PaSC!ii:NPJ:~ RANK PA(\nE NO 82 LEA iii 71-0:5 73-10 C0 1lNTY DISTRICT -CUSl,IMAN MUL..BERR-Y-ARKANSAS .f'UBI-I-1,\n----at.-lUl..-ll-.l.4:H-\u0026gt;'4-\\.\n+\u0026gt;!t-4-,'fY\u0026lt;~--t---bAl.------RF.\n~ -ANAk-SI.s- ____ -COLUMN 11 RANl\u0026lt;E:1\u0026gt; IM DErnl\u0026gt;I~~ ..XP\u0026amp;NSE PER-ADA- -NUMi\u0026lt;E:R OF'TEACHERS---- K-1-2 AVG. Sl.RY.----\u0026lt;....,..--{)F-GEfH-. 1'GHR8--.- K--12 --PERSGNNEL. -PAGE NO. 83 -- AV~. SI_RY. .CERT. F'ERS. -05-04-BOONE 32-11 I~l\u0026gt;ENGE: DISTRIGT Oi'IAHA l'HDLAHD OS.--.u\u0026lt;:,-,1$Ul,ffi-------4. 70 04-0 lill.NTON U-05 CRAX1\u0026gt;- ARl(.ANSAS-PUBL~ DISTRICTS ANIUAb FISCAL RE:?ORT--All\u0026gt;IAl~H..1,._------------------ -------{\n9L~ H- RAMKE:D I 1 DE:SCE:IDI IG ORDER PAC\u0026amp;\nN0 84 -RANK 24-03 FRANRL--:rN :Ji-04 HOWARD :m--08 LAWRENCE 29-06 HEMPSTEAD ~SAS PUBLICS CHOOLD ISTRICTSA NNUAFLI SCAL REPORTA NALYSIS cm.JNrrTINE\"\" MINERAL SPRTfilG'!o lJALNOT7UDGE SPR~t: COLUM1N1 RANKEDIN DESCENDING~O~R~D~E~R,\u0026lt;------------------.P\"AGE'\"\"'\"'=--NO=-.--=g5 1989-90 NUMB~R-0~ . S RY. 0. OF CERT. --.E=A--CHERS-K-12 TCHRS. K-12 PERSONNEL 89-90 90-91 89-90 90-91 89-'i'O 90-91 ~~--~~-- ~--~5 6 ---.., 8 9 10 AVC. CERT. 89-'i'O 1 St.RY. PERS. 90-91 --------------------t------+----- 12 ARKANSAPSU BLIC SCHOOLD ISTRICTS ANNUALF ISCAL REPORTA NALYSIS COLUMN11 RANKEDIN DESCENDINGO RDER PAGE NO. 86 1999-90 LEA t COUNTY 43-05 LONOKE HUMNOKE LEA# COUNTY 09-0i CHICOT 66-0i SEBASTIAN 60-03 PULASKI 27-04 CRANT 35-09 JEFFERSON 47-01 rfISSTSSTPPI 32-01 DIDEPENDENCE\" 60-02 POLASKI 17-0S CRAWFORD 52-04 OUACHITA 18-03 CRITTERDEN 67-01 SEVIER 30-02 HOT SPRING ~6-02 GARLAND 14-02 COLUHBIA :IT-03 PCJOr 63-01 SALINE -------ro-00 ~ -----.3- 1 1 ~ Al6-0S-l1TL\"L.~ -'1804 CRITT~ liS-12 Cl\u0026lt;AiGREA-U 19-05 0\u0026lt;oss- ---:23-07 FAULKNER ARKANSAPSU BLIC S~ROOLl \u0026gt;ISTRICTS ANNUALF ISCAL REPORTA NALYSIS DERMOTT 2 l'='ORT73HITH 3 POLASKI COUNTYS P 4 ProITTSVILLE 5 WATSON CHf!iPEL 2. ---vICONTA COLUMN12 RANKEDIN DESCENDING-ORDER-----------------~P~A~c~E~N~o~.-8-7 __ _ EXPENSE PER ADA 1989-90 LEA cocmrr O\"l-06 BENION 3:l-10 JEFFERSOff 54-01 l'HTL1-TPS 63-02 SALINE --:39-04 L~ ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS ANNUAL FISCAL REFORT ANALYSIS COLUMN i2~NKED IN DESCENDINC ORDER DISTRICT SILOAM SPRINGS WHITE RALL TiARTON/LEXA BENTON MARIANNA TiERQiAN AARR 48 49 50 \"\"5S \"\"\"\"5\"6 EXF'ENSE F'ER ADA i 2 2,421 2,664 2,846 2,696 2,315 2,622 . 2,468 2,702 2,520 2,614 2,0 2,~,\"SB2 722 755 646 073 4,139 4,400 i,717 NUMBER OF TEACHERS K-12 ~ SLRY. TCHRS. K-12 89-90 90-91 7 8 ' rn2.o 183.0 24~4.fS'l 44.0 44.0 22,590 23,713 -,823 23,511 23,038 23,917 178.5 21.579 23,597 59.2 22,33 23,710 42.6 23,312 \"\"23,420 278.7 23,192 23,648 NO. OF CERT. PAGE NO. _88 AVG. SLRY. PERSONNEL CERT. PERS. 89-90 90-91 89-90 90-91 9 10 ii 12 9.0 194.2 47.0 139.2 251.5 201.0 62.7 43.2 296.6 .6 ,9.9 H)r.0 144.0 23,745 194.3 25,024 47.0 23,750 145.7 24,131 254.0 23,939 195.0 22,776 62.7 23,430 45.6 24,605 297.2 24,255 3.6 24,336 ~3,939 i 16-:0 23 641 24,980 24,956 24,882 24,851 24,843 24,744 24,735 24,730 24,730 24,722 24,715 24,690 4,676 4,626 24,601 ---LEA .-coONTY DISTRICT DISTRICT ARKANSAPSO BCTCS CHOOLD ISTRICTS ANROAL~i SCAL ~EPORTA NALYSIS RANK i CC[UMN i~ANKED IN DESCEND-INC-ORDER --- 1989-90 NUM~ERO F -- - -TE:ACHE::RKS -12 D/H 8 90-91 2 -\nr---,r S 6 -,wr\n:- SLRY. TCHRS. K-12 89-90 90-91 ,- 8 NO. OF CERT. PERSONNEL 89-90 90-91 9 10 f'A~E NO. 90 AVG. SLRY. CERT. PERS. 89-90 90-91 11  12 144.9 23,144 23,122 90 84 73..:04 WHITE 03..:06\" BAXTER 44-03 MADISON 29-1Y1 HEMPS I EAD ----S-~PH I LLI PS 75-05 YELL 28 0i C:.F\u0026lt;EENE\" 33-02 IZARD 11 06 CLAY SAINI PAUL llLEVINS~ A:rNF ~ACLEY -ELAPLAU!tc MELBOURNE --cr.AY-\"l: PUBLIC SCHOOCDISTRICt!:n!1NNUAL FlSCAL REPORT ANALYSIS COLUMN 12 RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER PAGE NO. 91- - 1999-90 LEA COUNTY 25-02 FULTON 71-01 VAN BOREN 72-04 WASfITNGTOlll 20-03 DALLAS- 13-04 Cl.EVELAND 56-04 POYNSETT H-o-4 CLAY 23-04 FAULKNER 66-04 SEBASTTAN 13-08 WAI IE 24-05 FRANl\u0026lt;Cllr 15-03 CONWAT 59-02 -PRiURIE------- 29-06 HEMPSTEAD 10-03 ct.ARK :n-04 HOWARD 1\"3-01 CLEVELAND 56-07 -POYNSETT\" 73-----oS WAI IE 7'5-07 YEU. 21-03 -UESHA ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL l\u0026gt;ISTRrn ANROAi:::-F\"ISCAL REPORT ANALYSIS- -CO[. UHN 12 RANRElr--xN l\u0026gt;ESCEND!NC O mE:R DISTRICT woom::-Alilff MARKED TREE:PIGGUI I c\nUY-PERKTNS HARTFORD GRIFF I I Av ILLE ULA -i\u0026gt;ESWFUREW 2e..1 252 53 254 2,390 2,445 \"3,0B\u0026lt;r \"3,124 r,830 2,881 2,  63 T,406 AVC. SI.RY. CERT. LEA t COUNTY DISTRICT t\nARCAND ARKANSAPSU BLIC SCHOOLD ISTRICTS ANNUALFI SCAL REPORTA NALYSIS COLUMN12 RANKEDIN DESCENDINGO RDER 1989-90 NUMBEROF AVC. SLRY. , 44 28,185 PACE NO. 93 NO. OF CERl. AVG. SLRY.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1418","title":"\"Reflections on the Little Rock School Case,\" Photocopy","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Woods, Henry, 1918-2002","Deere, Beth"],"dc_date":["1991"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational law and legislation","Law--History","Segregation--Arkansas--Little Rock","School integration","Legal research--Arkansas"],"dcterms_title":["\"Reflections on the Little Rock School Case,\" Photocopy"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1418"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["73 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1452","title":"Report: \"1991-92 Incentive Schools Monitoring Report,\" Office of Desegregation Monitoring, United States District Court, Little Rock, Ark.","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)"],"dc_date":["1991/1992"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School enrollment","School integration","School management and organization"],"dcterms_title":["Report: \"1991-92 Incentive Schools Monitoring Report,\" Office of Desegregation Monitoring, United States District Court, Little Rock, Ark."],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1452"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":["92 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_990","title":"Report: ''Annual School Improvement Plan,'' North Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1991/1992"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Education--Arkansas","Educational planning","School improvement programs"],"dcterms_title":["Report: ''Annual School Improvement Plan,'' North Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/990"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_957","title":"Report: ''Arkansas Compensatory Education Annual Evaluation Report,'' North Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1991/1992"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School improvement programs","Student assistance programs"],"dcterms_title":["Report: ''Arkansas Compensatory Education Annual Evaluation Report,'' North Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/957"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_884","title":"Reports: School building capacities, North Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1991/2010"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School enrollment","School buildings"],"dcterms_title":["Reports: School building capacities, North Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/884"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"loc_rosaparks_47939","title":"Rosa Parks, actress Cicely Tyson, Rev. Joseph Lowery and an unidentified woman at the reception for the unveiling of Rosa Parks' bust sculpture, National Portrait Gallery, Washington, D.C., 1991] [graphic].","collection_id":"loc_rosaparks","collection_title":"Rosa Parks Papers","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, District of Columbia, Washington, 38.89511, -77.03637"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1991"],"dcterms_description":["Title devised by Library staff."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":null,"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":null,"dcterms_title":["Rosa Parks, actress Cicely Tyson, Rev. Joseph Lowery and an unidentified woman at the reception for the unveiling of Rosa Parks' bust sculpture, National Portrait Gallery, Washington, D.C., 1991] [graphic]."],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Library of Congress"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.47939"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Please contact holding institution for information regarding use and copyright status."],"dcterms_medium":["photographic printscolor1990-2000.gmgpc"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","Tyson, Cicely","Lowery, Joseph E."],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"loc_rosaparks_47564","title":"[Rosa Parks and an unidentified man at the Henry Ford mansion (Fair Lane), Dearborn, Michigan] [graphic].","collection_id":"loc_rosaparks","collection_title":"Rosa Parks Papers","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Michigan, Wayne County, Dearborn, 42.32226, -83.17631"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1991"],"dcterms_description":["Title devised by Library staff."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":null,"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":null,"dcterms_title":["[Rosa Parks and an unidentified man at the Henry Ford mansion (Fair Lane), Dearborn, Michigan] [graphic]."],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Library of Congress"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.47564"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Please contact holding institution for information regarding use and copyright status."],"dcterms_medium":["photographic printscolor1990-2000.gmgpc","portrait photographs1990-2000.gmgpc","group portraits"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null}],"pages":{"current_page":719,"next_page":720,"prev_page":718,"total_pages":6797,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":8616,"total_count":81557,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"educator_resource_mediums_sms","items":[{"value":"lesson plans","hits":319},{"value":"teaching guides","hits":53},{"value":"timelines (chronologies)","hits":43},{"value":"online exhibitions","hits":38},{"value":"bibliographies","hits":15},{"value":"study guides","hits":11},{"value":"annotated bibliographies","hits":9},{"value":"learning modules","hits":6},{"value":"worksheets","hits":6},{"value":"slide shows","hits":4},{"value":"quizzes","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":40428},{"value":"StillImage","hits":35298},{"value":"MovingImage","hits":4529},{"value":"Sound","hits":3226},{"value":"Collection","hits":41},{"value":"InteractiveResource","hits":25}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"Peppler, Jim","hits":4965},{"value":"Phay, John E.","hits":4712},{"value":"University of Mississippi. Bureau of Educational Research","hits":4707},{"value":"Baldowski, Clifford H., 1917-1999","hits":2599},{"value":"Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission","hits":2255},{"value":"Thurmond, Strom, 1902-2003","hits":2077},{"value":"WSB-TV (Television station : Atlanta, Ga.)","hits":1475},{"value":"Newman, I. DeQuincey (Isaiah DeQuincey), 1911-1985","hits":1003},{"value":"The State Media Company (Columbia, S.C.)","hits":926},{"value":"Atlanta Journal-Constitution","hits":844},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":778}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"African Americans--Civil rights","hits":9445},{"value":"Civil rights","hits":8328},{"value":"African Americans","hits":5912},{"value":"Mississippi--Race relations","hits":5750},{"value":"Race relations","hits":5604},{"value":"Education, Secondary","hits":5083},{"value":"Education, Elementary","hits":4729},{"value":"Segregation in education--Mississippi","hits":4727},{"value":"Education--Pictorial works","hits":4707},{"value":"Civil rights demonstrations","hits":4440},{"value":"Civil rights workers","hits":3536}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966--Correspondence","hits":1888},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1815},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1709},{"value":"Baker, Augusta, 1911-1998","hits":1495},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1312},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1071},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":858},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":814},{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":719},{"value":"Mizell, M. Hayes","hits":674},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":626}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"name_authoritative_sms","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":2598},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1915},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1704},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1331},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1070},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":856},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":806},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":625},{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":605},{"value":"Snelling, Paula","hits":580},{"value":"Williams, Hosea, 1926-2000","hits":440}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Nobel Prize","hits":1769},{"value":"Ole Miss Integration","hits":1670},{"value":"Housing Act of 1961","hits":969},{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":853},{"value":"Memphis Sanitation Workers Strike","hits":366},{"value":"Selma-Montgomery March","hits":337},{"value":"Freedom Summer","hits":306},{"value":"Freedom Rides","hits":214},{"value":"Poor People's Campaign","hits":180},{"value":"University of Georgia Integration","hits":173},{"value":"University of Alabama Integration","hits":140}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":17987},{"value":"United States, Georgia, Fulton County, Atlanta, 33.749, -84.38798","hits":5437},{"value":"United States, Alabama, Montgomery County, Montgomery, 32.36681, -86.29997","hits":5151},{"value":"United States, Georgia, 32.75042, -83.50018","hits":4847},{"value":"United States, South Carolina, 34.00043, -81.00009","hits":4599},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":4328},{"value":"United States, Alabama, 32.75041, -86.75026","hits":3948},{"value":"United States, Mississippi, 32.75041, -89.75036","hits":2910},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":2580},{"value":"United States, Tennessee, Shelby County, Memphis, 35.14953, -90.04898","hits":2580},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":2536}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Georgia","hits":12823},{"value":"Alabama","hits":11313},{"value":"Mississippi","hits":10220},{"value":"South Carolina","hits":8493},{"value":"Arkansas","hits":4733},{"value":"Texas","hits":4399},{"value":"Tennessee","hits":3786},{"value":"Florida","hits":2602},{"value":"Ohio","hits":2403},{"value":"North Carolina","hits":1875},{"value":"New York","hits":1840}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1966","hits":10632},{"value":"1963","hits":10287},{"value":"1965","hits":10218},{"value":"1956","hits":9840},{"value":"1955","hits":9619},{"value":"1964","hits":9365},{"value":"1968","hits":9345},{"value":"1962","hits":9247},{"value":"1967","hits":8897},{"value":"1957","hits":8523},{"value":"1961","hits":8282},{"value":"1958","hits":8259},{"value":"1959","hits":8061},{"value":"1960","hits":7948},{"value":"1969","hits":7348},{"value":"1954","hits":7240},{"value":"1950","hits":7118},{"value":"1953","hits":6969},{"value":"1970","hits":6835},{"value":"1971","hits":6425},{"value":"1977","hits":6367},{"value":"1972","hits":6254},{"value":"1952","hits":6162},{"value":"1951","hits":6046},{"value":"1975","hits":5894},{"value":"1976","hits":5863},{"value":"1974","hits":5849},{"value":"1973","hits":5689},{"value":"1979","hits":5416},{"value":"1978","hits":5405},{"value":"1980","hits":5366},{"value":"1995","hits":4885},{"value":"1981","hits":4811},{"value":"1994","hits":4704},{"value":"1948","hits":4597},{"value":"1949","hits":4573},{"value":"1996","hits":4542},{"value":"1982","hits":4417},{"value":"1947","hits":4317},{"value":"1985","hits":4313},{"value":"1998","hits":4281},{"value":"1983","hits":4261},{"value":"1997","hits":4258},{"value":"1984","hits":4152},{"value":"1999","hits":4074},{"value":"1946","hits":4047},{"value":"1945","hits":4018},{"value":"1986","hits":4006},{"value":"1990","hits":3988},{"value":"1943","hits":3900},{"value":"1944","hits":3896},{"value":"2000","hits":3894},{"value":"2001","hits":3876},{"value":"1942","hits":3868},{"value":"1940","hits":3765},{"value":"1941","hits":3758},{"value":"1987","hits":3744},{"value":"2002","hits":3624},{"value":"1991","hits":3553},{"value":"1936","hits":3507},{"value":"1939","hits":3501},{"value":"1992","hits":3500},{"value":"2003","hits":3489},{"value":"1993","hits":3478},{"value":"1938","hits":3466},{"value":"1937","hits":3450},{"value":"1989","hits":3441},{"value":"1930","hits":3378},{"value":"1988","hits":3355},{"value":"1935","hits":3307},{"value":"1933","hits":3271},{"value":"1934","hits":3271},{"value":"1932","hits":3255},{"value":"1931","hits":3240},{"value":"2005","hits":3143},{"value":"2004","hits":2995},{"value":"2006","hits":2860},{"value":"1929","hits":2790},{"value":"1928","hits":2272},{"value":"1921","hits":2124},{"value":"1925","hits":2040},{"value":"1927","hits":2026},{"value":"1924","hits":2012},{"value":"2016","hits":2011},{"value":"1926","hits":2010},{"value":"1920","hits":1976},{"value":"1923","hits":1955},{"value":"1922","hits":1929},{"value":"2007","hits":1715},{"value":"2008","hits":1664},{"value":"2011","hits":1661},{"value":"2009","hits":1624},{"value":"2019","hits":1623},{"value":"2015","hits":1613},{"value":"2013","hits":1604},{"value":"2010","hits":1601},{"value":"2014","hits":1567},{"value":"2012","hits":1553},{"value":"1919","hits":1533},{"value":"1918","hits":1531}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"0193","max":"2035","count":506439,"missing":56},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"photographs","hits":10710},{"value":"correspondence","hits":9628},{"value":"black-and-white photographs","hits":7678},{"value":"negatives (photographs)","hits":7513},{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":4462},{"value":"letters (correspondence)","hits":3623},{"value":"oral histories (literary works)","hits":3607},{"value":"black-and-white negatives","hits":2771},{"value":"editorial cartoons","hits":2620},{"value":"newspapers","hits":1955},{"value":"manuscripts (documents)","hits":1692}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/","hits":41201},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":17721},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/UND/1.0/","hits":8830},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/","hits":7090},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/","hits":2186},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/","hits":1778},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-CR/1.0/","hits":1115},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","hits":145},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/","hits":60},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-RUU/1.0/","hits":51},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","hits":27}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Jim Peppler Southern Courier Photograph Collection","hits":4956},{"value":"John E. Phay Collection ","hits":4706},{"value":"John J. Herrera Papers","hits":3288},{"value":"Baldy Editorial Cartoons, 1946-1982, 1997: Clifford H. Baldowski Editorial Cartoons at the Richard B. Russell Library.","hits":2607},{"value":"Sovereignty Commission Online","hits":2335},{"value":"Strom Thurmond Collection, Mss 100","hits":2068},{"value":"Alabama Media Group Collection","hits":2067},{"value":"Black Trailblazers, Leaders, Activists, and Intellectuals in Cleveland","hits":2033},{"value":"Rosa Parks Papers","hits":1948},{"value":"Isaiah DeQuincey Newman, (1911-1985), Papers, 1929-2003","hits":1904},{"value":"Lillian Eugenia Smith Papers (circa 1920-1980)","hits":1887}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"John Davis Williams Library. Department of Archives and Special Collections","hits":8885},{"value":"Alabama. Department of Archives and History","hits":8153},{"value":"South Caroliniana Library","hits":4251},{"value":"Atlanta University Center Robert W. Woodruff Library","hits":4102},{"value":"University of North Texas. Libraries","hits":3854},{"value":"University of South Carolina. Libraries","hits":3438},{"value":"Hargrett Library","hits":3292},{"value":"Richard B. Russell Library for Political Research and Studies","hits":2874},{"value":"Mississippi. Department of Archives and History","hits":2825},{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":2785},{"value":"Rhodes College","hits":2264}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":81102},{"value":"Collection","hits":455}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":81360},{"value":"true","hits":197}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}