{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_255","title":"Board of Education members","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1991/2006"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","School board members","School boards","Little Rock (Ark.). Office of Desegregation Monitoring"],"dcterms_title":["Board of Education members"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/255"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["correspondence"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nA V :\u0026gt; THU : 3 1 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Of THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT and THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS CONCERNING THE JOINT OPERATION OF KLRE FM The purpose of this agreement is to provide for the joini operation of the radio station, KLRE FM, (hereafter referred to 1V as the \"Station) by the Little Rock School District (hereafter referred to as the \"School District\") and the University of Arkansas for the University of Arkansas at Little Rock (hereafter - -J', referred to as the \"University\".) i I. Purpose of the Station The station will operate in the interest, convenience, and ry of the Arkansas radio listener and will provide educa-informational, and cultural programming of consistently good quality. It will also provide an opportunity to qualified students of Doth institutions to participate in the operation of the Station. The Station will continue to conform to high stan-dards of operation. as represented by its present adherence to the criteria for qualification given by the Corporation for nacc I Public Broadcasting and Natioh'al Public Radio. II. Board of Overseers There will be a joint Board of Overseers (hereafter referred to as the \"Board\") to embody the unity of purpose of the two institutions in the operation of the station and to unify to the % maximum degree possible the resources contributed by them, with the following composition and general purposes: li 1 -1- ' M A V THU 3 : 3 2 P . 0 1. The Board will be responsible for establishing policy consistent with the purposes of the Station, as set forth above, and for recommending to the School District the selection of the Station Manager. 2. The Board will be comprised of seven (7) members. Three will be appointed by the Superintendent of the School District. Three will be appointed by the Chancellor of the University of Arkansas at Little Rock. These six members will jointly, by majority vote, select an additional at-large member. In recognition of the commitment and significant contribution to KLRE FM of the organization known as the Friends of KLRE, the Superintendent and chancellor will each regularly select one of his or her three appointees to the Board from among the members of the Board of Directors of the Friends of KLRE, so long as the organization, its purposes, commitment and interest in KLRE remain essentially unchanged and at substantially the same or greater level of commitment as presently exists. Each selection of a Frlends of KLRE Board Member will be from a list of two nominees presented to the Superintendent or Chancellor by the Board of Directors of the Friends of KLRE. 3. Members of the Board will serve terms three years in length, with the Superintendent and Chancellor, respectively, determining which of their initial appointees will serve for terms of one, two, and three years. The at-large member will serve a three-year term. Any vacancy that occurs other than at the end of a term will be filled by the District, the University or the Board, as the case may be, for the balance of the unex- -2-T H LI : 3 2 F- . 0 3 pired term. When the term of Board position occupied by a a member of the Board of Directors of the Friends of KLRE expires, that position will be filled with a member of the Friends Board, so that there will always be two members of the Friends Board serving on the Board of Overseers, subject to Paragraph 2 above. 4. The Board will, by majority vote. elect its chair- person and otherwise organize and conduct its business in accordance with recognized rules of order. 3 . The school District will provide the members of the Board with general liability insurance against risks customarily insured against by Boards of commercial radio stations, if such coverage is obtainable at reasonable cost. III. Station Manager Under the oversight of the Board, the Station Manager will be responsible for the operation of the Station, including the selection and supervision of personnel and the administration of the budget, subject to the provisions of Section VIII below. IV. Sharing of Basic Financial Support The School District and the University will contribute equal amounts of basic financial support to the Station annually. a The Superintendent and the Chancellor will determine. in timely manner, the level of support to be contributed by the respective institutions for each succeeding year. In the event they are not able to agree on revised level of support for the upcoming year, the level set for the current year will continue to be applicable. -3- aM ft V  2 3  =\u0026gt; 1 THU F- . 0 -4 V. Location The University will provide a studio and house the Station in Stabler Hall. However, the Board may seek relocation of the Station to another site subject to the concurrence of the Superintendent and Chancellor. The university will accord to radio station staff the usual privileges, with regard to parking, building access, and such matters, as are accorded to institutional personnel. Withdrawal or Dissolution Withdrawal from this agreement, by either the School District VI . or the University, will require a written notice of two years. unless decided otherwise by mutual agreement. In the event of withdrawal, or of dissolution as a result of nonperformance of obligations, the party, if either, which beco- mes sole Ixcensee of the Station, will be granted use of all movable equipment which has been an integral part of the Station's operations, for the amount of One Thousand Dollars (Sl/000) per year, unless decided otherwise by mutual agreement. and the use of such equipment shall be automatically renewed annually for the sum of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000) per year. The withdrawing party or the party causing dissolution of the joint agreement as a result of nonperformance of its obligations, agrees to execute such documents. assignments, notices, applica- tions, instruments of transfer and any other documents or instru- ments necessary to effect the transfer of the license or any permits to the surviving party as sole licensee of the Station. -4- 3 1 THU 3:33 If because of the withdrawal by the University from this P . 0 5 joint undertaking or if the School District should become sole licensee of the Station as a result of the nonperformance of the obligations of the university hereunder, the School District shall have the option to lease the space in which the Station is then located. Such lease shall be upon terms and conditions as mutually agreed between the parties and shall be terminable by the lessee on reasonable notice out not less than sixty (60) days. The rental shall be reasonably related to the rental for similar space in the community considering, however, the value to the University of the continuing use of the Station by its students. VII. implementation 1. For the fiscal year during which this Agreement becomes effective, the School District and the University will each contribute on the effective date an amount equal to $178.08 for each day remaining in the fiscal year. This meets the cri- ter ion set by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting as the minimum total budget for stations applying for Community Service Grant. 2. The current station Manager and staff of KLRE FM will be retained as employees of the School District\nprovided, however, nothing herein shall be deemed to accord a contractual right to continued employment to any such employee or to modify the employment agreements between the Little Rock School District and the current Station Manager and staff of KLRE FM. -S aM A  THU Si : 3 -T R . 0 e 3. The School District will contribute to the joint agreement KLRE FM, with its license, Corporation for Public Broadcasting and National Public Radio qualification that provi- des National Public Radio programming and yearly Community Service Grant, the support of the Friends of KLRE FM, its underwriting, its grants and agreements, including the grants a from the Arkansas Arts Council and the Arkansas Endowment for the Humanities. The tower, transmission equipment, and building with associated land, currently used at 7701 Scott Hamilton Drive, will continue to be dedicated to KLRE FM as a backup for the main transmission system, use in microwave relay, and for ancillary services. in addition. such movable equipment, programming, programming supplies, and related materials as would enhance sta- tion operations in new location will be dedicated to the a jointly-operated station. Depending on the effect of applicable regulations on purchasing and property, and upon the judgment of the Board, such equipment may be retained on the School District inventory or may become jointly owned property or may be leased to the University. 4. The university will contribute to the joint agreement construction permit, 1icense, transmitter, transmission line. tower site and associated equipment for a transmission at the tower site including any buildings that the University may deem necessary, and the audio equipment that was previously purchased for a campus radio station. Depending on the effect of applicable regulations on purchasing and property, and upon the judgment of the Board, such equipment may be -6-THU = : 3 -4 R - 0 T retained on the university inventory or may become jointly owned property or may be leased to the School District. VIII. Continuing Operations 1. In order to conform to the laws of the State of Arkansas, the funds of the Station shall be received, recorded, disbursed, and reported through the accounting system of the School District. The Station shall, therefore, operate under the same laws, acts. regulations, administrative policies and proce- dures, and personnel policies and procedures as the School District. In addition. the Station shall be subject to the normal review. audit. and support of the School District officers having a function in the process. 2. The Board of Overseers shall cause an annual audit, independent or legislative. of the books to be made and shall make an annual financial report in writing to the cooperating institutions. 3. Contracts by the Station shall be let and purchases shall be made in accordance with the legal requirements applicable to contracts and purchases of the School District and shall be in accordance with the policies and procedures of the School District. The Station staff shall be eligible for the benefit programs available to the employees of the School District and shall for ail purposes be considered employees of the School District. 5. The foregoing approach is not meant to preclude other arrangements which might later be necessary or more -7- 4.r-1 V  2 3  5 1 5 I T H II appropriate and advantageous, if agreed to by the Superintendent F- . 0 S and Chancellor. IX. Special condition This Agreement shall be in effect and binding upon the School District and the University upon the satisfaction of the following specific condition: All necessary permits, applica- tions and approvals from the Federal Communications Commission shall have been obtained. X. Effective Date This Agreement shall become effective on the day the KLRE FM signal is broadcast simultaneously on its present frequency (90.5 FM) and on the frequency assigned to KUAR ( FM). XI. Binding Effect This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto, and upon their successors and assigns including any successor to the School District by merger or consolidation. THIS AGREEt*lNT is entered into this 7th day of July , 1986 by the undersigned officers of the University and the School District each of whom is duly authorized by appropriate resolution of the Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas and the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District, as the case may be. for the school DISTRICT! FOR IVERS, Ys Ed Kelly, Superintendent ay T rnton, President - fir Date 7- 7- Date -8-STATfc OF ARKANSAS COUNTY OF PULASKI SCHOOL EMPLOYEES CONTR LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Copy SALARY CLASS Unci SCHOOL KLRE/KUAR This contract, made and entered into by and between the LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT of PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS, and Charles Saults Witnesseth\n/ R - 0 By a majority vote Of the directors present at a legally held meeting\" on !I agrees to employ the said Charles Saults as Board Operator/ Producer I Position) in the above named school district for a period of days 12 months, beginning July 1, 1990 and ending June 30, 1991 paying for said services as follows\ncVJ/) bi / (check one) The rate of $ gcrfev-t .5ma,cn/per year (Daily Rate $ Plus ) The rate of $ Plus per hour for hours authorized.  RELATIVE OF BOARD MEMBER, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS, OR SENIOR ADMINISTRATOR: Said Employee WAS NOT related to a member of the School Board, Superintendent of Schools, or senior administrators reporting directly to the Superintendent of Schools at the time of employment (Board Policy EPS Code: CBCA). ( ) Other conditions\nGiven this the AZ day of May 1990 I LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Employer) (Employee Signature) X Preitirlanf_____ ______ iPresideni cftle tdurai Board, J trresiaeni ci me Doar (Address of Employee) (SeSMr^UtUy School Board) Copies of this contraci are to be given to (1) employee, \u0026lt;2\u0026gt; the school board, \u0026lt;3) the county treasurer, and (4) the county supervisor. Food handlers must Comply with Act 128 of 1965. \"A legally held meeting is One held: (1) on the regular meeting date of the school board at which a quorum is present\n(2) at a called meeting lor which each director has been duly notified In advance and at which a quorum is present r-ttm r^\\frrr\u0026gt; r\u0026gt;z\u0026gt;rv [ i Little Rock School District Personnel Directory 1992 Board of Directors 2Lone 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 Director Dr. Katherine Mitchell PO Box 1896,03 375-9377 W. D. \"Bill\" Hamilton 306 Arthur Drive, 04 664-8727 Dorsey Jackson 2901 No. Fillmore, 07 664-2393 Rollin Armstrdng 711 Shea, 05 Dr. 224-6982 John Moore 12015 Pleasant Tree Drive, 11 223-2297 Patricia Gee 8409 Dowan Drive, 09 562-0571 Oma Jacovelli 6622 Gold Court, 09 568-7585 Term ends 1993 1992 1994 1992 1993 1994 1994 Dr. Ruth S. Steele, Superintendent Little Rock School District 810 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 (501)324-20003-vear terms r T SCHOOL DISTRICTS BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY OF PULASKI 1992 - 1993 Ijii . a ll, ITLE ROCK **M3.9 Mills Dr-. C. .T ------ -- IL^lac Bernd, Supt., 810 West Marltham. LR 72201 G. Jacovelli 6^22 Gold Court------- -resident___________________ Little Rock,^AR 72209 4^ 12015 Pleasant Tree Dr. President__________________ Little Rock, AR 72211 -atricia Gee 8409 Dowan Drive ^cretarv------------------------------- Little Rock, AR 72209 2W1 N. Fillmore _________________Little Rock, AR 72207 Dr. Katherine P. Mitchell 1605 Welch St. .Iember_________________________Little Rock, AR 72206 y^ohn A. Riggs 3600 Foxcroft rr------------------------Little Rock, .AR 72207 ill D. Hamilton 306 .Arthur Drive vQn----r-i----------------------Little Rock, AR 72204 x992 LRSD school election postponed- 568-7585(H) 374-6535(W) 223-2297(H) 3r9-2498(w) 562-0571(11) 375-3275(W) 664-2393(H) 374-6305(W) 375-9377(H) 5'70-3528(W) 223-8916(H) 661-2590(W) in in #6 in in #4 #2 324-2000 TW 1993 1994 199^ 1993 1992* 1992* xyyz school election postponed- when rescheduled, those elected shall serve to 1995 ^.TH SmERoS*---STf?fG was appointed to serve the unexpired tern biiiLh, kucK__36.3 Mills Mr. James Smith. Sunt. p^5 Rnv AS? tTTd toTTS------771-5000 1^ Mable Mitchell President Pat Blackstone 'ice President Prentice Dupins Secretary_______ Lynn Hariiilton Member___________ Dixie Harrison Member J. W. Johnson -iember Marty Moore Member Smith, Supt., P.O. Box 68/. NT.R, 771 IS 5006 Glenview Blvd. -------------------------------------------- North Little Rock, AR 72117 3409 Bunker Hill North Little Rock, AR 72116 431 McCain Blvd., F-23 North Little Rock, .AR 72116 4103 /Arlington North Little Rock, AR 72116 One Shady Valley Court North Little Rock, AR 72116 437 West Fourth St. ~ North Little Rock, AR 72114 4417 Central North Little Rock, AR 72118 753-5128 791-O267(H) 758-2209(H) 753-146KH) 771-4506(H) 758-3181(H) iil JE in in #5 in in 1993 1994 I99i^ 1993 1993 1995 4-vear terms __________________ ^ULASKl COUNTY SPECIAL**43.9 Mills -'Ir. Gene Goss President 3-r. Jim Burgett '.^ice President_________ ZMr, Reedie Ray Secretary_______________ Mr. Doyan Matthews Member___________________ LMr. Mack McAlister Member_________________\nirs. Mildred Tatum Member Mrs. Ruth White Tucker -Iember Mr. Bobby Lester, Supt. 29 Narragansett Dr. P.O. Box 8601, L.R. 72216 490-W North Little Rock, AR 72120 35 Fairfield Drive North Little Rock, AR 72120 414 East Valentine Rd. Jacksonville, AR 72076______ 5422 Elizabeth Lane North Little Rock, AR 72118 P.O. Box 956  Jacksonville, AR 72076 11405 Highway 365 Little Rock, AR 72206 19001 Kanis Road Little Rock, AR 72211 835-1311(H) 982-5650(H) 851-2O97(H) 982-4491(W) 897-4842(H) 821-3224(11) in in in in #6 #1 ?Z2 1994 199^ 1996 1996 1995 1995 1993 - repared by Ms. Debbie Crownover, Secretary PULASKI COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION .Q/16192 372-7800 J CCT I 9 1552(5-year terms) Mr. Cecil Bailey President Mr. Thomas Broughton Vice President Dr. George McCrary Member Mr, E, Grainger Williams PULASKI COUNTY BO.ARD OF EDUCATION 1992 - 1993 5805 Eagle Creek North Little Rode, AR 72116 4602 W. 23rd Little Rock, AR 72204 #2 Crestview Plaza Jacksonville, AR 72076 P.O. Box 366 372-4181(W) 835-7104(H) 664-6577(W) 982-4551(W) 372-3056(W) #1 NLRSD 1995 #3 LRSD South 199fc #2 PCSSD 199'' North #5 LRSD 1 . Little Rock, AR 12202, 666-8697(H) \"'North ~ 1992 election postponed, position is currently at-large, but will be Zone 5 LRSD/No. 199. Dr. Martin Zoldessy Member 11601 Rodney Parham Little Rock, AR 72212 224-0200(W) 223-0100(H) #4 PCSSD 199^ South Ms. Debbie Crownover Secretary to the Board 504 E. Devon Sherwood, AR 72116 372-7800(W) 835-9347(H) Secretary sine 1985John Moore 374-6535 (work) 223-2297 (home Bill Hamilton 664-8727 (home) Dr. Katherine Mitchell 374-6305 (work) 375-9377 (home) John Riggs 570-3528 (work) Pat Gee 569-2498 (work) 562-0571 (home) Oma (O.G.) Jacovelli 568-7585 (home) Dorsey Jackson 375-3275 (work) 664-2393 (home) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Board of Directors 1992-93May 5, 1992 Ms. Pat Gee Arkansas State Highway Dept. 10324 Interstate 30 Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 Dear Ms. Gee: As taxpayers in the Little Rock School District, we feel that now IS the time for the Little Rock School Board to deal effectively with the needs of the district as well as being sensitive to the needs of the majority of the patrons of the district. The Board must hire an African American Superintendent. It is because of the current high rate of failure for African American students in the Little Rock School District that we support the hiring of an African American Superintendent. are many factors which have resulted in this very high statistic. There Realizing that all of the blame does not belong to the schools, the schools must share some of the responsibility for this problem. There have not been programs or directed curriculum which have dealt with the problems of our children effectively. The fact that the district is 68% African American is a most prevalent statistic which should be considered in the hiring of a Superintendent. We need a Superintendent who can relate to the majority complexion of the district, as well as addressing the most urgent needs of our educational system. At this time, the hiring of a Superintendent who can alleviate our problems and bring our district into focus is most imperative. You must consider the most urgent needs of the district, as well as doing what is best to bring the majority on equal standards as the minority. For too long, the School Board has addressed the needs of the minority and neglected the needs of the majority. The solution for a district such as ours demands special consideration. You must consider the fact that African-Americans represent the majority of students in the Little Rock School District, and black patrons and students should be given special consideration in light of the years of neglect. Very truly yours.1. 2. 3 . Patron's List 4. V^- 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11V 12. 13. 14 . 15. 16.1 17. nri^ 18. 19. 20. 21. 22 . 23 . 24 . 25. - H3.?af''\u0026lt;i^\n-S^z /z - 8, ^2^ - 3 (^\n(U - 1 I I i. .JUL-27-92 MON 15:29 U S DISTRICT CLERK FAX NO. 15019724612 JUL-27-92 HON 13:09 U. S. DIST. CT. LR ARK. FAX NO. 7406096 P. 02 P. 03 t ii-iesQ. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS J- 3 ra . WESTERN DIVISION 'r --------------- dale CHARLS3, ROBERT L. BROHN, SR., GHBN HBVBY JACKSON, DIANE DAVIS, and RAYMOND FRAZIER V. 1cRC^92=476 PLAINTIFFS O.G. JACOVELLI, Individually and As President of the Board of Education o the Little Rock School District, PATRICIA GES, DR. GEORGS CANNON, JOHN MOORE, DORSBV JACKSON, DR. KATKERINB MITCHELL and ff.b. BItiL\u0026gt;' HAMILTON, Individually and In Their official Capacities as Members of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District, A Public Body, Individually and in their Official Capacities and THB little rock school DISTRICT, A Public Body Corporate DEFENDANTS COMPLAINT 1. Jurisdiction is pursuant to 28 u.S.c.  1331, 1343 and 42 U.S.c. 1973j as amended. Relief la sought pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution and 42 U.S.c. S1973j, as amended. 2. Plaintiffs are citizens of the United States of the African American descent who reside in the Little Rock, Arkansas School District, a public body corporate. They bring thia action to redress rights guaranteed them under the Constitution of the United states and federal laws. 3. The defendants are O.G. Jacovelli, Patrioia Gee, Dr. George Cannon, John Moore, Doraey Jackson, Dr. Katherine Mitchell and W.D. \"Bill\" Hamilton, the individual directors of the BoardJUL-27-92 MON 15:29 U S DISTRICT CLERK JUL-27-92 MON 13:09 U. S. DIST. CT. LR ARK. FAX NO. 15019724612 FAX NO. 7406096 P. 04 of Education of P. 03 the Little School District, a public body corporate\nand the Board of Education of Little Rock School District, 4. This is an action to reform the single member district school zone lines which are utilized by the defendants in school lections for the purpose of electing school directors. This is also an action to ensure that such reformation is pursuant to and consistent with the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended. Plaintiffs seek to have the district reformed into eeven (7) single member districts of approximately equal population pursuant to a plan that allows citizens of African American descent the opportunity to maximize their opportunity to participate in the political process Early relief prior and to elect representation of their choice, to another school election is further sought. 5. When single member districts were established approximately seven (7) years ago. each district had approximately 25,000 residents. The lines were then drawn using data collected in 1980. That data is now obsolete. 6. The 1990 census reflects that Little Rock has a population of 175,795. The white population in Little Rock is 113,707 while the African American population is 59,742. The balance of th population consists of persons who are designated by the census as others including persons of Hispanics and Aslan origin. 7, Between 1980 and 1990, the African American population in Little Rock increased by approximately 6,600 while the white 2-JUL-27-92 MON 15:30 U S DISTRICT CLERK FAX NO. 15019724612 P. 04 JUL-27-92 MON 13:09 U. S. 01 ST. CT. LR ARK. FAX NO, 7406096 P.05 population decreased by approximately 9,100. 8. Between 1980 and 1980/ the white population dramatically moved into the western sector of the Little Rook while the African American population moved into the southwest and central sectors of Little Rock. 9. As a consequence of demographic changes, the zones or election districts which are currently utilized fox the election of school directors are now significantly imbalanced. The following listing Bhowfi the relative population (by racial percentage) of each election population by race of each of the zones in the Little Rock school District or school zone in the defendant school district. RGHOQl DT3THICT (ZONE)_(Racial %1 1980 ONE 25,399 (31%) TWO 25,295 (69%) THREE 25,210 (7,3%) FOUR - 24,844 (2,9%) FIVE 25,016 (18,0%) STX 25,107 (17.36%) SEVEN 25,043 (14.1%) 1990 21,239 (85%) 16,607 (77.3%) 26,375 (15.0%) 32,421 (4.9%) 30,354 (24.3%) 23,536 (29.9%) 22,601 (33.2%) Imbalance 4,070 -8,688 +1,165 +7,577 +5,738 -1,571 -3,442 10, Ths United States Constitution provides that each person's vote shall be of equal weight. above do not allow for equal weight of pie of \"one man - one vote.\" The imbalances set forth each vote under the princi 11. The out of balance election syetem in the Little Rook School District limits and denies citizens of African American descent appropriate opportunity to elect representatives of their choice. 3' JUL-27-92 MON 15:30 U S DISTRICT CLERK . jUL-27-92 nON 13!10 u. S. DI ST. CT. LR ftRK. FAX NO. 15019724612 FAX NO. 7406096 P. 05 P.06 12. There is a history of Glectiona in the City of Little racially polarized voting in Rock and in school elections. Fuxthemore, the Little Rock School District has a history of unremadiated racial segregation in staff of African American descant. the treatment of pupils and Moreover/ resident citizens of African American descent continue to ejtperience difficulty in securing equal treatment from and by the access directors in the Little Rock School District. to the board of 13. The defendants are aware of the grossly inbalanced numbers in the zones or alection districts. They have taken no steps to bring the itibalance within the \"one man - one vote\" principle or within the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended. The original redistricting of the Little Rock School District was encompassed in the cases of Little Rook School District at ^1. JLu Pulaski County Special Sohool-D.iatrict, ..ell,al  t (USDC HO. lr-C-82- 866) . These plaintiffs believe that Lt is appropriate for that history and background to be consldaxed in formulating the relief for which they pray, Ag^ga- 14. School elections are presently set to be held on September 15, 1992 for positions two (2) and four (4) now held by Defendants Hamilton and Cannon. Both districts are naw grossly imbalanced. See Paragraph Hine, supra 13. IC new school elections now set for September 15, 1992 proceed, plaintiffs stand to ba deprived of the right to vote and of their voting rights secured by th* Voting Rights Act. plaintiffs therefore seek to enjoin the schedule elections until a 4'jUL-27-92 MON 15:31 . , JUL-27-92 nON 13:10 U S DISTRICT CLERK u. S. DIST. CT. LR ARK. FAX NO, 15019724612 FAX NO. 7406098 P. 07 P.06 new plan is approved by the Court which meets: (a) the \"one man - one vote\" requirement of the Constitution and, (b) the requirements of the Voting Rights Act. 16. The plaintiffs nave been deprived of well defined and well protected tights as guaranteed by federal law. They have no adequate remedy by which to redress these wrongs but this action for injunctive relief- Any other remedy would be eo uncertain, vexatious and time consuming as to deny full relief. WHEREFORE, plaintiffs request that this matter be expedited on the merits so that a decision thereon can ba promptly reached. Plaintiffs further pray that the present sones be realigned and redistricted in accordance with the \"one man - one vote\" principle and the principles of the Voting Rights Act including the creation of an additional majority African American school voting district. Plaintiffs also pray for their costa including reasonable couneel fees. Respectfully submitted, JOHN W. WAbKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rook, AR 72206 (501) 374-3758 dselidrliiS-lP By: W. walker - Bar Ko. 64046 ^ley A. Branton, Jr., #90053 Mark Burnette - Bar Ko. 88073 Austin Porter Jr,, #86145 5.1 F5LED U.SS.. DDIISSJT-RRIlCCTT CCOOUUPRT EASTEh.--' r/.T-.rcT . nvMMCA OKiCO ci u IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION SEP 04 1992 CARL R, iiritr* LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DEW. CLERK .INTIFFS V. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE'tfOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ORDER On motion of the Little Rock School District (LRSD) and the Pulaski County Board of Education (PCBE), and without objection from any of the parties to this action, the PCBE Zone 5 election currently scheduled for September 15, 1992, is hereby postponed until the time of the LRSD 1992 Board of Education election. IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of September, 1992. UNITED SSTTAATTEESS DISTRIICCTT JUDGE R 3 c 1 THIS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET IN :OMPL!^^WWiil^TlI RRIULE 53 AND/OR 79(a) FRCP BY L TO: FROM: SUBJECT: little rock : SCHOOL DISTRICT STREET 72201 810 WEST  little rock, ARKANSAS January 4, 1993 All Building principals = Z 9 BWX 'J V JAN 1 2 159.3 -''ce cf Cuss-rsjation Mj and Department Heads ttonriQ id Mac Bernd, superintendent new policies of Schools C-- the manner in Bnclosed pleaee find .XaTgeSdat^SStralJ^e*^^\"-? Which we review meeting on the eliminated. -- \u0026amp;oi to he at e p.h. on The regular school Boar conduct an will continue the fourth Thursdajy of each month. Please dispose new policies  these two new poxx^^-- ?Aloies they replace. of the policies in your policy manual and r\"EPS CODE: BDDB ADOPTED: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 12/18/92 REPLACES OR REVISES POLICY: BDDB  SCHOOL BOARD AGENDA An agenda for each regular meeting of the Board of Directors shall be prepared by the Superintendent of Schools. The method used by the Superintendent to establish the Board agenda must provide an opportunity for the Board members to voice objections or add items. The agenda will contain only those items introduced by the Board members and Superintendent. Only items scheduled in the agenda will be acted upon in a regular Board meeting unless a suspension of the rules is agreed to in compliance with Policy BDDEB (Suspension of the Rules of Order). The order of business at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors shall be: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Call to Order Roll Call Minutes Presentations A. B. C. D. Superintendent Citizens Committees Board Members Partnerships Remarks From Citizens Action Agenda Report Agenda Consent Agenda Audience with Individuals or Groups Student and/or Employee Disciplinary Recommendations Adj ournment Persons wishing to address the Board during the \"Remarks from Citizens\" section of the agenda will be required to sign up and state the subject of their remarks prior to the convening of the meeting. The Board may vote to set time limitations or representatives to speak for large groups whose interests similar. P - require are Persons speaking about issues on the agenda for Board action will be given priority during the \"Remarks from Citizens\" section. If additional time is required for or employee remarks or if there is a large delegation wishing to address a single issue not on the agenda, the Board may vote to defer their comments to the \"Audience with Individuals or Groups\" complete the pending agenda in a timely manner. section in order toEPS CODE: BDDC ADOPTED: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 12/18/92 REPLACES OR REVISES POLICY: BDDC PREPARATION OF SCHOOL BOARD AGENDA An agenda for each regular meeting of the Board of Directors shall be prepared by the Superintendent of Schools in the following manner: On the second Thursday of each month the- Board of Directors will meet to review the agenda topics proposed by the Superintendent of Schools for that month's regular Board meeting on the fourth Thursday During the agenda review meeting Board members will have the opportunity to place items on the agenda and will decide whether items will be on the action agenda, report agenda, or consent agenda. At the conclusion of the agenda review meeting, the agenda will contain only those topics introduced by either the Superintendent or members of the Board of Directors. The Board will strive to keep its regularly scheduled meetings on the second and fourth Thursday of each month\nhowever, for good cause, the Board may move any regularly scheduled date to another date agreed to by a majority vote of the Board. The Superintendent will have the agenda and the appropriate background materials printed and delivered to the Board members at least two days prior to the regular Board meeting.CHRISTOPHER HELLER FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK A PARTNEMHI? of INOmDUAU AND PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS ATTCaNEYS AT LAW 2000 FIRST COMMERCIAL 3LTLDING 400 WEST CAPITOL LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-3493 Tslepaone (501) 376-2011 Fix No. (501) 376-2147 Dizcet Ko. 370-1506 MEMORANDUM TO: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS DR. MAC BERND, SUPERINTENDENT DATE: FEBRUARY 22, 1993 I am writing to provide you a report about the significant developments in this case since the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals approved our desegregation plans and settlement agreement and to advise you about matters which are pending before the District Court. In its order approving the settlement plans and settlement agreement submitted by the parties, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals noted that\" [i]t may be necessary, in order to make a smooth transition, for the details of the settlement plans to be adjusted to produce an appropriate fit between their future application and existing circumstances.\" Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District. 921 F.2d 1371, 1394 (8th Cir. 1990). All three school districts propos^ modifications to the settlement plans. The District Court issued a forty-four page order on May 1, 1992 approving some of the proposed modifications and rejecting others. The four desegregation plans presently in effect (one for each of the three school districts and the interdistrict desegregation plan) have been revised to include the modifications authorized by the May 1, 1992 order. The following documents define the desegregation obligations of the Little Rock School District and the other parties to this case, and are available to each of you at the Administration Building if you do not have a personal copy: 1. Pulaski County School Desegregation Case Settlement Agreement - March, 1989 (as revised September 28, 1989)1. Desegregation Plan - Little Rock School District - April 29, 1992 (there was an order filed on June 1, 1992 which corrects four typographical errors found in the bound volume) 3. 4. 5. The orders Desegregation Plan - Pulaski County Special School District - April 29, 1992 Desegregation Plan - North Little Rock School District - April 29, 1992 Interdistrict Desegregation Plan - April 29, 1992 which have been issued by the District Court since the publication of the desegregation plans have been mailed to each of you. A complete collection of court orders is maintained at the Administration Building. Jerry Malone (370-1553) and I (370-1506) are always available to answer any questions or concerns you may have about this case or about our district's implementation of our desegregation pl^. The most pressing issues now before the Court concern the structure of the Little Rock School District's budget and the implementation of its desegregation plan. In October 1991, the Office of Desegregation Monitoring informed the Little Rock School District that it must be able to provide the Court with information which: \"(1) Accurately and comprehensively accounts for the expenditure of settlement funds\n(2) demonstrates the link between the district's legal requirements and the fiscal underwriting of those requirements\n(3) describes a desegregation budgeting process that can be demonstrated, justified, and verified\nand (4) enables the district to determine what adjustments might be necessary in order to align finances with desegregation allegations. It On January 21, 1992, the District Court found that \"the LRSD's current budgetary process does not meet the above requisites\" and ordered the Little Rock School District to \"submit a revised 1991-92 budget which is directly correlated to the specific provisions of the settlement plan\" together with a long range budget projection and a long range revenue projection. On May 1, 1992 the District Court ordered the Little Rock School District to submit a revised budget. The Little Rock School District filed on June 1,1992 a document titled \"LRSD Projected Revenue and Expense - 1992/93 - 1996/97\". The Little Rock School District revised its budget projections based upon then current information and supplied the revised budget projections to the District Court on July 31, 1992. The Little Rock School District also filed a special status report which contained the budget proposal for the 1992-93 school year which had been approved by the Board. Following an August 3, 1992 hearing to discuss the Little Rock School District budget, the District Court issued an order on August 4 approving the proposed reductions except the elimination of a seventh period at McClellan Community High School. The 2Court alsQ.notifT.ed the Little Rock School District that it would require that music teacher ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------tu n'vvu.u 1C4UJ.1C uiai inusxv Lcavuci positionsf^he seventh period at Henderson Junior High School be restored for the 1993-94 academy year. The Court promised that a more detailed order which would explain the Court's reasoning would follow. The detailed order was filed on December 30, 1992. The December order explained that the budget reductions made for the 1992-93 school year \"will all be monitored closely and may have to be restored if the Court determines the cuts are having a negative impact on the district's desegregation efforts\". The Court required the Little Rock School District to submit any future proposed budget changes to the Coun and directed the Little Rock School District not to implement any changes prior to the Court's approval. The Court provided some insight into how future budget reduction proposals will be reviewed. For example, the Court expressed concern \"about the district's decisions to tamper with popular programs like gifted and talented, music, magnet features, and eliminating staff at schools that are successful (such as the established magnets) and those schools trying to be successful (such as the incentive schools and the new magnets, McClellan and Henderson).\" The Court also expressed concern about the impact of budget proposals on teacher morale and reductions which put the Little Rock School District at risk of non-compliance with State standards or statutes. The District Court also entered an order on November 5 concerning the impact of the 1992-93 budget reductions upon the magnet schools. The Court directed Little Rock School District to reinstate certain positions of the magnet schools and to present to the Court prior to pre-registration any changes in the magnet schools contemplated for the 1993-94 school year. Following the Board's decision on January 28, 1993 not to pursue a grant application to fund an Aerospace Technology School, the District Court notified the Little Rock School District that the hearing scheduled for February 1, 1993 to consider the Aerospace grant would instead be directed toward \"other issues of concern to the Court\". At that hearing, the Court expressed concern about the Little Rock School District's commitment to complying with its desegregation plan. The Court was particularly concerned that our budget make it difficult to discern budget priorities and to monitor spending on implementation of the desegregation plan. The Court emphasized the need for good faith compliance with the desegregation plan in order for the Little Rock School District to eventually be released from District Court supervision and also emphasized that the Little Rock School District should make clear to the community that the desegregation plan is something to which we are committed. The result of the hearing is that the District Court will take a more active role in directing and monitoring the budget process and that the Little Rock School District will be required to hire one additional person to work on the budget. I have ordered a transcript of the hearing and you are all welcome to review it once it has been prepared, all previous hearings if anyone would like to review Aem). (I have transcripts of almost 3There will be a hearing at 9:30 a.m. on Friday, March 19, 1993 to review the effects of the Little Rock School District 1992-93 budget cuts which were addressed by the District Court in its December 30, 1992 order. The has Court asked me to remind you of its continuing concern about the Little Rock School District's budget process and to encourage you to attend the March 19, 1993 hearing. It would be helpful to review in advance of the hearing the budget cuts adopted by the Board this summer, together with the District Court's August 4 and December 30, 1992 orders concerning those cuts. I will continue to forward all orders to Dr. Bernd as soon as I receive ttem for immediate distribution to the Board. I will also provide periodic written reports to the Board concerning the legal proceedings in this case. 4M.i\\R 3 1995 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION Office of Desegregation Monitoring LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. ORDER FILED U.S. OIST.^ICT COURT =ASTERhl 0!S7?:CT ARKANSAS MAR -1 1993 CARL h. p!LEF.K DEF.CLEft PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS The Court hereby orders the members of the Little Rock School District Board of Directors to be present at the March 19, 1993, hearing, which will begin at 9:30 a.m. in Room 305 of the United States Post Office and Courthouse Building. The Court had previously requested that they be present but upon further reflection has detemnined that their presence is required. DATED this 1st day of March, 1993. TED ST?AATTEESS DISTRICT JJUUTDGE RSCFr/FD V. 'THIS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET IN COMPLIANCE W5TH RULE 53 ANO/OR 7S(a) FRCP ON tl E STATEMENT OF JUDGE SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT to Little Rock School Board and Counsel - March 19, 1993 An Order was issued directing the Little Rock School Board members to appear in Court this morning so that the Court may take this opportunity to explain this case and to explain the constraints placed upon your actions by the orders of the U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. The Court does not believe that you understand those orders, or if you do understand them, you do not seek to comply. Hopefully, after this morning, you will have an understanding\nbut whether you do or not. you must comply. This Court has been too lenient with you. The Court has given you ample leeway and opportunity to move toward a unitary school system. Those days of Court leniency and the assumption by the Court of good faith on your part are over. This current litigation is in a larger sense the continuation of desegregation litigation in the Little Rock School District which began in the Spring of 1956. At one time that litigation was thought to have been brought to a successful conclusion and the Little Rock school system seemed to have entered a period of relative tranquility and complete self-management. However, in 1982, the current litigation was brought by the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District, as plaintiff, against the North Little Rock School District and the Pulaski County Special School District. The Little Rock School District essentially was seeking county-wide desegregation and the -1-reconstituting of school boundaries between Little Rock and the County School District. The complaining party, the Little Rock School District, won its case. It also won its case against the State of Arkansas, and in a settlement involving the three school districts and the State, the State was assessed over $129,000,000 as something in the nature of reparations for its alleged role in promoting continued segregation in Pulaski County. As a part of the settlement approved by the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, the school districts agreed to a program which, it was believed, would ultimately lead to a unitary. desegregated school system in Little Rock, North Little Rock, and Pulaski County. This settlement was essentially the product of the Little Rock School District, the victor in this litigation, and it was approved by the Court of Appeals at the behest and active encouragement of the Little Rock School District. Now, it must be put into effect by the District Court. This Court settlement which you and your lawyers agreed to put in place is a costly settlement. The magnet school aspect of it. which seems to be an enormous success, is not nearly as expensive as the incentive schools. which. with one exception, presently appear to be failures as far as desegregation is concerned. In addition to the structure of this system, there are innumerable other aspects of your settlement agreement. which OU were instrumental in having approved, which are very costly. Since the time of victory by the Little Rock School District in this case, when the Court of Appeals granted almost every facet -2-of relief requested by Little Rock, the Little Rock School District has shown a tendency to drag its feet and act as if it had lost, rather than won, the litigation which it instituted. The Little Rock School District and the other school districts are in Court because the Little Rock School district won its case and won the relief it requested. Yet the major complainer, the chief whiner, the number one barrier to a legitimate declaration of a unitary desegregated school system is the victorious complaining party, the Little Rock School District. The biblical reference, in a different context, is to the effect that if you ask, you will receive. Well, you asked, you got it, and it is the basic job of this Court to see that you receive it in full measure. To help this Court and to assist you in obtaining the relief that you sought and that has been approved for you as you requested, there has been created and approved by the Court of Appeals the Office of the Desegregation Monitoring. That office. as created, has been sufficient as currently staffed until recently when it became increasingly apparent that the Little Rock School District could not or would not develop a budget sufficient to identify the expenditure of desegregation funds. It is unclear to the Court  and would be unclear to anyone  how funds are being allocated to achieve the desegregation goals sought by the LRSD and approved by the Eighth Circuit. This Court has brought home this deficiency to the administration and attorneys of the LRSD on a number of occasions and has received only unfulfilled promises and requests to give you time. These deficiencies were brought to your -3-attention in the 1990 Curriculum Audit Report and in the Court's order of January 21, 1992. It was discussed again in a budget hearing in August 1992. You have had time. Because you have evidently failed to understand this concern, the Court directed that you appear here today. The Court, either today or in the next few days, will appoint a budget officer to be paid by the Little Rock School District, who will be a part of the Office of Desegregation Monitoring and who will operate under the direction of Ann Brown. Now, there are some questions that you and others raise from time to time. My list is not exhaustive by any means, but it contains some rather common questions that are raised or falsely asserted as fact. Here are some of the leading ones, and here are the answers\n1. Whv can't we have neighborhood schools? That is a perfectly sound question to be put forward by someone who does not know anything about law. The fact is, there are many neighborhood schools. Because the settlement plans foster voluntary movement to facilitate desegregation, there are other types of schools too. such as magnets. interdistrict schools. and incentive schools. Many features of the desegregation plan are designed to give parents a choice in where their children attend school. However, because the order of the Court of Appeals requires racial balance in the schools, it is not always possible to have neighborhood schools and meet the requirements that have been imposed. That is why busing  which originated as a device to bring distant or -4-rural children to the closest public school - is employed as a device to disperse black children to predominantly white areas and white children to predominantly black areas. Racial barriers imposed by law in housing are unconstitutional\nbut for socioeconomic reasons, there is racial segregation in living patterns here. Extensive and expensive busing of school children to achieve racial balance is the only answer. Until the U. S. Supreme Court changes the law or until the Court of Appeals alters its orders, busing will remain a requirement that cannot be avoided. 2. Why can't we have a revised desegrecration plan focusing on high Quality education and student achievement? The Court is very sympathetic toward that goal and reminds you that the ultimate goal of desegregation is high quality. equitable education for all children. However, that is not all that you agreed to do in your settlement agreement, which you were successful in having the Court of Appeals approve. And so this Court, which in this respect acts as much in an administrative capacity as in a judicial capacity, is directed to carry out your expensive, approved plan. That plan of yours does focus on high quality education, but it also provides large sums of money for items that are not necessarily part of a basic or core curriculum. It was your plan that you agreed to\nyou got it approved by the Court of Appeals\nand I must enforce it. Let me make this clear: while the District Court has some latitude in modifying the plan, the Court of Appeals has identified elements of the plan which it deems essential and which, under present circumstances, are not within the prerogative of this Court of modify. -5-3. A budget officer to assist the School District is just a \"make work situation. No, it is not\nthat is patently false. The Court cannot determine how you are spending your money to achieve desegregation. Your administrators do not know. Your lawyers do not know. And you do not know. If the LRSD were a corporation, I would put it in receivership. By the way, do not think that I have not considered that with regard to the LRSD. Finally, I wish to close these remarks with some more words directed to the School Board. You are in the position of trustees for the school patrons. Until you begin to comply with the orders of this Court and the Court of Appeals, you are not carrying out your trust in an acceptable manner. I have never seen, heard or read of a case in which the victors conducted themselves like the vanquished  until now. If we have to have two full hearings a month, in which Board members are required to be present, then we will do so. We will do everything that is required to see that you take the medicine to achieve the cure that you asked the Federal Courts to give you. Following is a reminder of some of the provisions of the Plan or Court orders that you have yet to fulfill. Board Responsibilities According to the introductory section of the 1992 LRSD desegregation plan, the LRSD Board of Directors has committed to the following goals, but has so far not fulfilled them:  Eliminating achievement disparity between black and white students on norm-referenced and criterion referenced tests.  Promoting positive public reaction to desegregation. -6-in  Effectively using interdistrict and intradistrict recruitment strategies to meet the desegregation requirements all schools and to avoid resegregation. Additionally, under the title \"Leadership\" on pages 2-3 of the 1992 plan, the board and superintendent have failed to assert strong leadership in the following areas\n Clearly delineating the district's desegregation mission to the staff and the community.  Utilizing the desegregation mission as a guide for developing policies and setting expectations for the superintendent to implement those policies.  Adopting a budget that will provide the resources necessary for an effective, desegregated school system.  Making budgetary decisions consistent with district desegregation policies in terms of buildings, staff, materials, and equipment.  Conducting an annual self-evaluation of their commitment to a quality desegregated education. Incentive Schools  The district has failed to reserve kindergarten and four-year- old program seats for white students and to documented, those students. sustained, engage in and vigorous recruitment to attract (Plan page 140\nMay 1992 Order, page 28)  Program specialists have not been hired and placed at all incentive schools. (May 1992 order, page 41) A staffing needs assessment has not been administered, analyzed, and used as the basis for staffing decisions. 1992 order, page 41) (May  Themes have not been incorporated into the core curriculum at each incentive school. (May 1992 order, page 42)  Little significant progress has been made toward desegregating the incentive schools, (1992 plan, page 149) with the exception of Rockefeller.  There is a lack of coordinated recruitment and failure to implement all plan recruitment activities. 215-217) (1992 plan, pages  The Parent Council has not begun to monitor or report on all -7-activities related to the incentive school plan, page 151) program. (1992 Equity Issues  The district has failed to show significant progress in reducing the achievement disparity between black and white students. 26) (1992 plan, page 1\n1989 Settlement Agreement, page  Black students (particularly black males) continue to be disciplined at a rate disproportionate to their percentage of the student population. (1992 plan, pages 28, 33-34)  The district has failed to effectively address the overrepresentation of black students (particularly black males) in special education. (1992 plan, page 111) Recruitment  The district has not developed a strategic recruitment plan pursuant to the ODM Incentive School Recommendations (page 4) and the LRSD Marketing Plan.  A recruitment tracking system, first requested during the March 1991 hearing implemented. on LRSD school construction, has not been Additional Items from the May 1992 Order  A plan has not been submitted describing the extended activities designed to address the needs of Washington Magnet School attendance zone students. (May 1992 order, page 38) -8-RECgIVO Little Rock School District Board of Directors Memorandum APR I 1993 Office of Desegregation Mi To: Ann Brown From\nJohn Riggs, IV Re: Attached Statement Date\nMarch 31, 1993 Ann: I read the attached statement at the March 25th board meeting. I thought you may want a printed copy for your and possibly the court's information. If you should have any questions on what my intent or meaning in any of this was, kindly call me and I will do my best to explain the somewhat warped way that my brain sometimes operates. What do you think about the new MLK attendance zones? I like the idea of letting our patrons have the choice of attending a new interdistrict school or an old incentive school, but I fear we may run afoul of the court. STATEMENT OF JOHN RIGGS, IV TO THE LITTLE SCHOOL BOARD AND THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT COURT AT THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL BOARD MEETING -3/25/93 Last Friday, March 19th, was my first visit to a federal court. I have a few observations on that first visit that I would like to share with our board, our administration, and our students and patrons. First, for the most part, people invoked in the federal court system are nice folks. Although at times some folks do get a tab over emotional, on the whole I was very well treated. The court folks were kind enough to reserve a nice big chair especially for me that was in front so that I could see the action up close and personal-if the proceedings had been a Razorback basketball game we would have had the equivalent of court side seats. Being fairly naive about courts and lawyers in general, I found the day to be a very interesting civics lesson, much like the civics lesson Dr. Bernd referred to when discussing some of our Central students and our hearing for Mr. Hickman. I would say on the whole, I enjoyed most of the day and look forward to my ne.xt indoctrination into how our court system works. I just wish you lawyers would stop suing me for trying to do the best I can in this job. I do feel I did pick the best profession for me by becoming a simple tractor salesman rather than a lawyer or judge While we were in court, the judge was nice enough to give us a report on our conduct and what she expects of us as the ultimate leaders of the LRSD. Some patrons and citizens I have talked with since Friday think the Judge was way out of line with this documentI do not. Frequently, as a manager, I give folks who work with and for me oral and written evaluations so that they can become better at their jobs by working on weaknesses and emphasizing strengths. Any good manager (and surly our federal judge would want to be construed as a good manager) does thisso I do not think her actions were out of line. I concur with Judge Wright that we have a legal if not moral obligation to do everything under our power to ensure that the LRSD is pursuing a course of quality desegregated education. I also happen to believe that we should do what ever it takes to comply with Judge Wrights ordersafter all, she is a federal judge, makes a hell of a lot more money than we do, and can not be fired or beat in an election. But besides those reasons, I believe we should do what we can to carry out this plan because the Little Rock School District Board of Directors voted to implement it to the best of the school district's ability, and I believe there are parts of it that are effective in achieving the goal of a quality, desegregated educational experience for our students though I again agree with the judge that there are parts of the plan that are expensive and may not be the most economical or effective means to achieve our goals. I do take offense to some of the statements made by Judge Wright in her report to us. First of all, I am not a whiner or a complainer. It offends me that the Judge feels the need to stereotype me for comments that were not made by me nor that reflect the official and stated policy of the LRSD. I would remind the Judge of her own words from the hearing last week \"impressions are important\". I believe that we should not allow ourselves to be involved in name callit will serve no useful purpose. Again, though I find other areas of agreement with Judge Wright. Her statement that the LRSD acts as if it lost its court case is a dead solid perfect description of how many of the patrons and even this board feels about our current situation. And understandably so, for any time that people lose the right to direct their lives and institutions, then those people have LOST. And in a real sense, the citizens of LR have lost most of the ability to direct the most important institution in our fair cityour schools. The vital, important lesson here is this: do the moral and right thing the first time and hold people accountable so that you do not put yourself in the position where you have to seek help from the federal court system. I also am very concerned about the judge's statements seemingly discouraging discussion by duly elected public officials at an official public meeting. Discussion and debate are key elements in a true democracy. Certainly public debate over the direction of our most important political entity, our schools, should be encouraged. Again. I am not suggesting in an way that we disregard the federal authorities in this casewe should make every reasonable effort to carry out our desegregation plan and Judge Wright' orders with all deliberate speed. I also have some concerns over Judge Wright's orders in regards to our attendance at court hearings. I chose to believe that Judge Wright is being truthful in her document when she requested our attendance at this particular hearii^ because she feared we do not understand our obligations or her ordersothers in the community believe Judge Wright's actions to be purely punitive and vindictive. I chose to reject this argument. I truly believe the judge is concerned about our understanding of some of the issues and her orders in this case. I would ask. though, that the judge give some considerations to the nature of this board when she requires our attendance at more hearings. The LRSD board is composed of non-paid volunteers who are elected by the ta.xpayers of the school district. Each of us have a job we are employed at in order that we can pay the rent, cloth and feed our family, and pay our taxes. We serve because we are committed to public service and to quality public education. The court must be mindful of the already countless hours of time that we take away from our jobs to serve our patrons. I believe the judge runs a very real risk of implying that only the independently wealthy who do not have to work can serve on this or any other public boardthis is a dangerous and wrong signal to send to our community, and again I will remind the Judge that in her own words that \"impressions are important\". I would contend that if the judge is truthful in her belief that we do not understand her orders (and again I believe that she is) then I would say that if this board does not understand what Judge Wright expects after Friday's hearing then there is absolutely no hope for us and Judge Wr^t should go ahead and hold us in contempt and take over complete control of the school district. I believe that this board certainly got the message and that there is no need to continue to require us to attend hearings for the expressed reason of understanding her orders. The judge also expressed concern that our council and superintendent were not relaying to the board the full concern of the court. I would suggest that as a compromise, if the judge will cancel her order to require us to attend hearings, I will agree to attend all hearings in the next year and give a personal report back to the board on just exactly what the court expects. Although I am like the rest of the board with a job outside of my school board activities, I am very fortunate to work for an employer who will allow me to make this time commitment to the court and fortunate to work with very competent and thoughtful co-workers who will take up the slack in my absence. So I believe the judge has accomplished her goal of getting our attention and I will be willing to attend further hearings to ensure the board keeps the message, although I am sure other board members will want from time to time to attend hearings as they can and as they have done in the past. I would like to explain to the judge and our patrons also why sometimes members of this board seemed confused ( as I am most of the time) about our desegregation plan. Partly, and especially as it relates to our budget, we get mixed signals from the court. One the one hand the judge and Mr. Morgan at the ODM(and certainly me and Tm sure other board members) are insisting that we spend the proceeds of our desegregation settlement wisely and where it will do the most good. Yet, the judge also directs us to fund programs that the school district, this board, perhaps the Joshua Intervenors, and the judge herself feel are ineffective and a waste of money. So here is the great dilemma: we get accused of not spending money wisely by the court and then we are told by the court to spend money on programs that the court feels are wasteful and will not further us on oiu- road to achieve unitary status by having excellent desegregated education in Little Rock. It is no wonder that my wife thinks Fm turning into a schizoid. I talked at the February board meeting about how my company produces a marketing document first and then puts the dollars to it, not vice-versa. This statement was made in the context of agreeing with the court for the need to hire someone to assist us with developing a budgeting process along those lines. I would also remind the court that one of the values of a marketing document is that it is flexible and can be changed as market conditions change. An inflexible document or plan is the surest way I know of to send a company or a school district into bankruptcy. Judge Wright stated in court Friday that we have some latitude to modify this plan.There are only a very few provisions of the plan that are sacred according to the Sth Circuit court of appeals. I have those items and will pass them out to our board in case some of us have forgotten what they were. Anything else is fair game as long as the parties in the case agree that the plan needs to be changed and the changes are not facially unconstitutional. .And finally, since I have taken up too much time already, let me address some thoughts to the Joshua intervenors, the LRSD administration, this board, the Office of Desegregation Monitoring, the court and most importantly, our patrons. I find it very disheartening that this board and district seem to always find themselves in some sort of battle on a continuing basis. What particularly bothers me is that most times those that we fight have the exact same goals as we do!! And that goal is this: that Little Rock should have the finest desegregated school system that can afford where fairness and equity are found as the rule and where our patrons and students feel that they getting the best education possible in our town. As I was leaving the hearing Friday, Mr. John Walker was we are holding the elevator door for me and said, \"come on Mr. Riggs, as long as you don't mind riding with the enemy.\" Now I know Mr. Walker said this in jest because he knows that I consider him a friend and have great respect for him, but it is this misconception that since we sometimes do not agree on strategies that we must be enemies that holds this district and even this city back from greatness. We are not the enemy of the Joshua Intervenors\nwe are not the enemy of the Office of Desegregation Monitoring\nwe are not the enemy of Judge Wright and the eighth circuit court\nwe are not the enemy of the patrons of our gifted and talent programs\nwe are not the enemy of the students and parents from Central High\nwe are not the enemy of the Aero Space Education Center advocates. We are the enemy of ignorance\nwe are the enemy of prejudice\nwe are the enemy of inequity in education. I believe all these other groups believe ignorance, prejudice and inequity to be their enemy also. And so instead of enemies, we are allies in this school district's attempt to be an example of excellent desegregated education. It is this Paradigm that we must go forward with from this day on. This paradigm must have at its core inclusiveness\nthis paradigm must go along the lines of this: that to accomplish our ambitious and noble dream YOU AND I, not you OR I, but you AND I must work together, hand in hand to make our dream reality.f  RECEIVED FILED APR 7 1993 U.S. DIS) EASTERN OiS Office of Desegregation Monitofing IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION DALE CHARLES, ROBERT L. BROWN, SR., GWEN HEVEY JACKSON, DIANE DAVIS, and RAYMOND FRAZIER APR - 2 1993 OiaRu I i bt'iMi * t wi wucFiK ey: CC?. CU5HK PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C92-476 O.G. JACOVELLI, Individually and As President of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District, PATRICIA GEE, DR. GEORGE CANNON, JOHN MOORE, DORSEY JACKSON, DR. KATHERINE MITCHELL and W.D. \"BILL\" HAMILTON, Individually and In Their Official Capacities as Members of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District, A Public Body, Individually and In Their Official Capacities and THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, A Public Body Corporate\nCECIL BAILEY, THOMAS BROUGHTON, DR. GEORGE McCRARY, DR. MARTIN ZOLDESSY, and E. GRAINGER WILLIAMS, Individually and In Their Official Capacities as members of the Pulaski County Board of Education\nand THE PULASKI COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, A Public Corporate DEFENDANTS SEPARATE ANSWER OF O.G, JACOVELLI, PATRICIA GEE, DR. GEORGE CANNON, JOHN MOORE, DORSEY JACKSON, DR. KATHERINE MITCHELL, W.D. \"BILL\" HAMILTON AND THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT For their Separate AnsvJer to the Amended Complaint, defendants O.G. Jacovelli, Patricia Gee, Dr. George Cannon, John Moore, Dorsey Jackson, Dr. Katherine Mitchell, W.D. \"Bill\" Hamilton and the Little Rock School District (collectively \"LRSD\" defendants), state: lalhy\\P-Ete-S^.Amt 1. The LRSD defendants admit the jurisdiction of the court. 2. The LRSD defendants admit the identity of the plaintiffs. 3. The LRSD defendants admit the identity of the defendants named in paragraph 3 of the Amended Complaint, but deny that the Amended Complaint provides a sufficient basis upon which to proceed against any of the defendants individually. 4. Insofar as paragraph 4 alleges any wrongdoing on the part of the LRSD defendants, those allegations are denied. 5. Paragraph 5 of the Amended Complaint is admitted. 6. Paragraph 6 of the Amended Complaint is denied. 7. Paragraph 7 of the Amended Complaint is denied. 8. The LRSD defendants admit that during the decade between 1980 and 1990 there was western movement of both black and white populations in the City of Little Rock and the Little Rock School District, but deny the remaining allegations contained in paragraph 8 of the Amended Complaint. 9. The LRSD defendants admit that the current LRSD election zones are imbalanced by population according to the 1990 census. but deny the remaining allegations contained in paragraph 9 of the Amended Complaint, 10. Paragraph 10 of the Amended Complaint is admitted. 11. Paragraph 11 of the Amended Complaint is denied. 12. Paragraph 12 of the Amended Complaint is denied. 13. Paragraph 13 of the Amended Complaint is denied.  14. Defendants admit that the elections scheduled for September 15, 1992 have been postponed. k*diy\\P-Efc-Sep.Ai 215. Paragraph 15 of the Amended Complaint is denied. 16. Paragraph 16 of the Amended Complaint is denied. 17. The LRSD defendants admit that the County Board of Education is authorized and required by statute to divide the Little Rock School District into zones for the purpose of electing members to the Little Rock School District Board of Directors, but deny the remaining allegations contained in paragraph 17 of the Amended Complaint. 18 Paragraph 18 of the Amended Complaint is denied. 19. Paragraph 19 of the Amended Complaint is denied. 20 Paragraph 20 of the Amended Complaint is denied. 21. The LRSD defendants deny that plaintiffs are entitled to any of the relief requested in the prayer of the Amended Complaint. 22. The LRSD defendants deny each and every allegation contained in the Amended Complaint which is not specifically admitted in this Separate Answer. 23. The LRSD defendants affirmatively state that the Amended Complaint has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 24 . The LRSD defendants affirmatively state that they are public school officials who acted at all times in good faith and that they claim such immunities as are available to them on the basis of their status as public school officials and their good faith. 25. The LRSD defendants affirmatively state that they have no statutory duty or authority to establish or to reform the ]ci(l^\\P-Eb*Sep.AoB 3t boundaries of the zones from which the Little Rock School District Board Members are elected. 26. The LRSD defendants affirmatively state that the present Little Rock School District election zones were established by court order and that plaintiff should not be allowed to maintain a suit against these defendants which is premised upon defendants' compliance with an order of the district court. 27. The LRSD defendants affirmatively state that the Pulaski County Board of Education has prepared and presented to the district court a plan which brings the Little Rock School District election zones into compliance with the \"one-man one-vote\" and which is in compliance with the Voting Rights Act. WHEREFORE, the LRSD defendants pray that the Amended Complaint be dismissed with prejudice and for all other proper relief. Respectfully submitted, O.G. Jacovelli, Patricia Gee, Dr. George Cannon, John Moore, Dorsey Mitchell, Jackson, W.D. Dr. \"Bill\" Little Rock School District Katherine Hamilton, FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Street Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 By: Bar No. 81083 |a\u0026lt;\u0026gt;y\\P-Be-S\u0026lt;p.Am 4t I  CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Jacovelli, I certify that a copy of the foregoing Separate Answer of O.G. Jackson, Dr. Patricia Gee, Katherine Mitchell, Dr. George Cannon, John Moore, Dorsey W.D. \"Bill\" Hamilton and the Little Rock School District (collectively \"LRSD\" defendants) has been served on the following counsel by depositing copy of same in the United States mail on this 2nd day of April, 1993. Mr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A'. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell and Streett First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Larry Vaught County Attorney Pulaski County Board of Education 201 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 stopher Helle k\u0026gt;lly\\P-Elo-Sep.Am 5 ReCEIVPi^ APR 1 3 1993 Ofiics ot L IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL DEFENDANTS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS MOTION TO EXCUSE ATTENDANCE For their Motion to Excuse Attendance, Ms. O.G. Jacovelli, Mr. John Moore and Mr. W.D. \"Bill\" Hamilton, individual members of the Little Rock School District Board of Directors, state: 1. That by Order dated March 1, 1993, the court has scheduled a hearing to consider budget cuts for Monday, April 19, 1993 to continue, if necessary, through Tuesday, April 20, 1993. 2. That Ms. Jacovelli was recently discharged from University Hospital and remains under the care of her physician. Dr. William E. Golden, M.D. By letter dated April 7, 1993, Dr. Golden has requested that his patient be excused from court appearances while she is recovering from her recent surgery. copy of Dr. Golden's letter to counsel is attached to this motion as Exhibit \"A\". That Mr. Moore is a practicing attorney. He is counsel of record in a case which is set for a jury trial beginning Monday, April 19, 1993 at 9:00 a.m. in the Saline County Courthouse. He kiihyXP-Budtei.Exc 3 . Aalso has a pre-trial conference in another case set for Monday, April 19, 1993 at 10:00 a.m. in the Grant County Courthouse. See attached Exhibit \"B\". 4. That Mr. Hamilton is employed by the Arkansas Department of Health. On behalf of the Department of Health he must attend a meeting of the Regional Program Advisory Committee for the Title X Family Planning Program of the Federal Department of Health and Human Services, Region 6. The meeting will be held in Dallas, Texas. Due to this meeting, Mr. Hamilton will be out-of-state from April 18, 1993 to April 21, 1993. A copy of the RPAC agenda is attached to this motion as Exhibit \"C\". WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons. these board members request to be excused from the court's order directing their attendance at the April 19 and 20, 1993 hearing. Respectfully submitted. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Street Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 By CKristopher Hell^ Bar No. 81083 kaihyVP-Budget.Exc 2CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion to Excuse Attendance has been served on the follo^i^ same in the United States mail on this depositing copy of day of April, 1993: Mr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell and Streett First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Christopher Helle: kiihy\\P*Budset.Exc 3 .4hPF'-G\"- (et' o\nIEuI.IhI'IS II ITEF'KhL I IEE' Fh/ (10:501-1 1 n FOi 1? University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences DIVISION OF jeneralinternal MEDICINE 4301 Wesl Maiktiam Mail Slot i41 Little Rock, Arkansas 72205-7199 Office (501)606-5236 Williom E. Golden, M.D. Directo* (Obert C. Lavender. M D. DiieCtOf General Meriidno Clinic Susan S. Beland. M D. Director MeOicBi Education Generat Meoicme Clinic Appt? 688-7911 Pflrioperative Consullaiion Service Appts 686-5236 epeppr- 688-6022 Univerailv Private Modical Group Appts 088-5545 zqual Opponuntty fcmployer April 7, 1993 Chri.s Heller Attorney at Law, Friday, Eldridg4 and Clark Dear Mr. Heller, Re: Oma C. Jacovelli Please excu.ae Oma G. Jacovelli from her .scheduled coiu-t appearances. Ms. Jacovelli has recently been diochnrgcd from University, .She is recovering from Hospital and remains under my care. surgery and will be unable Lo be in court for the indetennirifuL near .future. Sincerely, - - - - - .5\n V William E. Go.ldhiv, M.D. Director WG/pm Exhibit \"A\" DI STATE OF ARKANSAS Office of The Circuit/Chancery Judge SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS GRANT COUNTY COURTHOUSE SHERIDAN. ARKANSAS 72150 January 6, 1993 Mr. John E. Moore Attorney at Law 400 West Capitol, Suite 1900 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Charles R. Padgham Attorney at Law 229 Hobson Avenue Hot Springs, AR 71913 RE: Glenn and Bradley VS Scallion Saline County Circuit Number CIV-92-721-2 Dear Mr. Moore and Mr. Padgham: PHILLIP H. SHIRRON CIRCUIT/CHANCERY JUDGE PHONE 501-942-7818 FAX 942-2442 I have set the above styled case for a jury trial, Monday, April 19. 1993 at 9:00 a.m. at the Saline County Courthouse in Benton, Arkansas. I am in possession of Mr. Moore's witness and exhibit lists and jury instructions. I have Mr. Padgham's jury instructions, but need his witness and exhibit lists by April 19. I would also need copies of any changes to the above, and copies of any new motions, etc. you. ene Davis Case Coordinator /dd cc: Pat Lightfoot, Court Reporter Saline County Circuit Clerk and File I i I i JAN - 7 1993 Exhibit \"B\" COUNTIES OF GRANT, HOT SPRING AND SALINE ! STATE OF ARKANSAS SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS GRANT COUNTY COURTHOUSE SHERIDAN. ARKANSAS 72 1 50 JOHN W. COUE CIRCUIT JUDGE PHONE S01 -942-2 1 65 March 18, 1993 Mr. John E. Moore Attorney at Law First Commercial Building 400 West Capitol Mr. Peter A. Miller Attorney at Law The Stephens Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 111 Center Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr, James F. Swindoll Attorney at Law Suite 200, 217 W. 2nd Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Lynn D. Lisk Attorney at Law Suite 1620, 111 Center Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Robert L. Depper, Jr. Attorney at Law 314 East Oak Street El Dorado, Arkansas 71730 Mr. Kevin J. Staten Attorney at Law Suite 300, 101 Spring Little Rock, AR 72201-2488 RE: Cason V. House Grant County Circuit No. CIV 92-101-1 Dear Attorneys: A pre-trial conference and hearing on all pending motions are hereby set for Monday, April 19, 1993 at 10:00 a.m. in the Grant County Courthouse. A trial date will be scheduled at the pre-trial conference. All attorneys or someone authorized to agree to a binding trial date, are required to attend. J\u0026lt;^hn W. Cole Cordially, JWC/me cc: Mrs. Lois Green, Court Reporter Mrs. Linda Shepherd, Circuit Clerk Court File V'\nMW I 0193 J II COUNTIES OF: HOT SPRING SAUNE. AND GRANT I-IhR 29 93 19:33 TO 93762147 FRijri kcPkuL'LiC . . -'C. ncr-ii- \u0026gt; r. JAMES BCWMAN ASSCXJIATES 421 EAST eth STREET  SUITE B  AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701  (512) 476-8341 MEMORANDUM TO: RPAC and RTAC Members PROM: Dick Casper SUBJECT: Schedule for our April meetings in Dallas DATE: 26 March 1993 Sunday, 4/18 - RPAC Members travel to Dallas and check into t Embassy Suites, Love Field (PH. 214/357-4500). the TBP has made room reservations and will provide airline tickets. Monday, 4/19 - RPAC Members meet in executive session to: 1. Develop plans for FY'94-'96 Regional Service Enhancement Activities 2. Develop Requests fur Proposals for any Ot the above Activities which are to be undertaken by one or more contractors 3. Plan for August 1993 RPAC meeting. Tuesday, 4/20 AM - RPAC Members continue in executive session. 1:30 PM - Begin general session to include reports from Paul Smith and Dick Casper. ??? PM - Resume executive session as needed. Wednesday, 4/21 AM - State Training Managers (other than Maggie Lujan) travel to Dallas, airline tickets provided by TCHT (see enclosed itineraries). (Hotel reservations have been made for Maggie to stay the night of 4/20. ) 8:30 AM - Nurse Practitioner RTAC meeting. 10:30 - General Training RTAC meeting. 1:30 PM - RPAC rAMirna frt laxecutivo taasion and Stato Training Managers have their own meeting. 4:30 ADJOURN Exhibit \"C\" RECEIVER COURT ijTcR.. district ARKANSAS APR 1 9 1993 IN THE UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS APR J 5 1995 Office of Desegregation Monitoring WESTERN DIVISION CARL R, Sy.-. CLERK /bvU'yy  DEP. CLERK LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. INTERVENORS ORDER Before the Court is the motion of Ms. Oma G. Jacovelli, Mr. John Moore, and Mr. W.D. \"Bill\" Hamilton, individual members of the Little Rock School District Board of Directors, to be excused from attending the hearing on the 1992-93 budget cuts, scheduled to resume on Monday, April 19, 1993. The motion is granted as to Ms. Jacovelli and Mr. Hamilton. The motion is conditionally granted as to Mr. Moore. If Mr. Moore does not have to appear at either of the two state court hearings. he is to appear at this Court's hearing. Because of their absence. a special, on-the-record hearing will be scheduled for Mr. Moore and Mr. Hamilton. If necessary. this hearing will be scheduled during an evening or on a Saturday. Ms. Jacovelli may attend the special hearing if her health permits. DATED this J^ day of April, 1993. COMFLL'J  -  II ' J DOCKET SHEET IN ^D/On_73{a) FRCP UNITED STATES DIS JUDGE f-h1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT vs. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL ORDER FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS ' 17 1993 CARLR. BRENTS, CLERK Bv.-_ J V DSP.CUKK PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS The Court has previously determined that the members of the Little Rock School District Board of Directors either do not understand the Court's Orders with respect to the District's obligations under the Plan, or deliberately do not seek to comply with those Orders. Because such noncompliance impedes the realization of a desegregated school system, this Court hereby orders each member of the school board to be present at all hearings in the Little Rock School desegregation case unless given specific permission to be absent. Those school board members who are excused from attending a particular hearing will be reguired to attend a review session. The Court has given much thought to the imposition of the attendance requirement on the school board members and concludes that there are no other suitable alternatives at this time. The ultimate accountability for the District lies with the District's school board. and it is the members of that board who are ultimately responsible for the District's good faith compliance \u0026amp; 2with the settlement plan. Yet the school board members, for whatever reason, have failed to fulfill their duties to ensure that the Court's Orders are heeded and that the District is competently managed. Such dereliction of duty has not gone unaddressed. In the past, the Court has instructed counsel for plaintiffs to inform the school board members of the Court's continuing concerns. At the February 1, 1993 hearing, the Court stated as follows\nI do intend to order that the counsel for the Little Rock School District inform the district concerning what the Court's concerns have been. Again, I mean, the whole theme for this hearing is that the Little Rock School District is not getting this Court's message ... It didn't get the message with respect to the junior high school problem. to the budgetary process. It didn't get the message with respect It didn't get the message with respect to preregistration and changes in the magnet school programs that had to be made and approved by the Court before preregistration. It didn't get that message. There is a communications problem between the Court and the Little Rock School District and I intend to be more active with respect to the Little Rock School District to address this problem. frequent hearings. I expect to have more I expect to ask Mr. [Christopher] Heller to tell them specifically what the Court has done. There needs to be more communication. Transcript of February 1, 1993 Hearing, pp. 104-05 (doc.#1756). The Court went on to instruct Mr. Heller that he inform the school board members of the Court's concerns, to which he replied that he would. Id. at 206. Mr. Heller subsequently issued a Memorandum (attached to this Order) to the Board of Directors and to Dr. Mac Bernd dated February 22, 1993, in which he purports to relay the Court's concerns. The Court finds Mr. Heller's Memorandum to state a brief history of the case that essentially does nothing to emphasize this -2-Court's concerns. Despite the Court's specific request, the school board members did not \"get the message.\" The District continues to suffer from repeated and continuous mismanagement, confrontation and delay with respect to Orders issued by this Court, and a lack of any leadership that could be expected to turn the situation around in a reasonable time. The District is hereby put on notice that these and other problems currently besetting the District would justify the imposition of a receivership, see, e.g., Morgan V. McDonough, 540 F.2d 527 (1st Cir. 1976), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 1042 (1977) , a situation to which the District finds itself moving ever closer. Although some have expressed concern that requiring the school board members to attend hearings in this matter will possibly deter individuals from running for the school board, implementation of the Plan is the Court's primary concern. Any impact such a requirement will have on the decision of others to run for the school board is secondary.* The Court would only note that it has never refused a reasonable request from a board member to be absent from a hearing. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that each member of the Little Rock School District Board of Directors be present at all hearings in the Little Rock School desegregation case unless given specific permission to be absent. Those school board members who are * Board member John Riggs, FV, in a letter to the Court dated June 10, 1993, requests that he be allowed to appear in court on behalf of the school board members instead of requiring that all members attend. Although the Court does not doubt the sincerity of Mr. Riggs request, the Court has unsuccessfully tried such an approach in its requests to counsel that the school board members be informed of the Courts continuing concerns. -3-excused from attending a particular hearing will be required to attend a review session. Dated this f C? day of June 1993. -4- IJNIT SS DtSSTtRriIct judge entered on docket rwpct i / '^1 - BY IN CHRISTOPHER HELLER FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK A PARTNERSHIP OF INDIVIDUALS AND PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS ATTCaiNEYS AT LAW 2000 FIRST COMMERCIAL BUILDING 400 WEST CAPITOL LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-3493 Tctophooe (501) 375-2011 Fix No. (501) 378-2147 DiratNo. 370-1506 MEMORANDUM TO: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS DR. MAC BERND, SUPERINTENDENT DATE: FEBRUARY 22, 1993 I am writing to provide you a report about the significant developments in this case since the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals approved our desegregation plans and settlement agreement and to advise you about matters which are pending before the District Court. In its order approving the settlement plans and settlement agreement submitted by the parties, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals noted that\" [i]t may be necessary, in order to make a smooth transition, for the details of the settlement plans to be adjusted to produce an appropriate fit between their future application and existing circumstances.\" Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District. 921 F.2d 1371, 1394 (Sth Cir. 1990). All three school districts propos^ modifications to the settlement plans. The District Court issued a forty-four page order on May 1, 1992 approving some of the proposed modifications and rejecting others. The four desegregation plans presently in effect (one for each of the three school districts and the interdistrict desegregation plan) have been revised to include the modifications authorized by the May 1, 1992 order. The following documents define the desegregation c^ligations of the Little Rock School District and the other parties to this case, and are available to each of you at the Administration Building if you do not have a personal copy: 1. Pulaski County School Desegregation Case Settlement Agreement - March, 1989 (as revised September 28, 1989)2. 3. 4. 5. The orders Desegregation Plan - Little Rock School District - April 29, 1992 (there was an order fEed on June 1, 1992 which corrects four typographical errors found in the bound volume) Desegregation Plan - Pulaski County Special School District - April 29, 1992 Desegregation Plan - North Little Rock School District - April 29, 1992 Interdistrict Desegregation Plan - April 29, 1992 which have been issued by the District Court since the pubEcation of the desegregation plans have been maUed to each of you. A complete collection of court orders is maintained at the Administration Building. Jerry Malone (370-1553) and I (370-1506) are always available to answer any questions or concerns you may have about this case or about our district's implementation of our desegregation plan. The most pressmg issues now before the Court concern the structure of the Little Rock School District's budget and the implementation of its desegregation plan. In October 1991, the Office of Desegregation Monitoring informed the Little Rock School District that it must be able to provide the Court with information which: II (1) Accurately and comprehensively accounts for the expenditure of settlement funds\n(2) demonstrates the link between the district's legal requu-ements and the fiscal underwriting of those requirements: (3) describes a desegregation budgeting process that can be demonstrated, justified, and verified\nand (4) enables the district to determine what adjustments might be necessary m order to align finances with desegregation allegations. II On January 21, 1992, the District Court found that \"the LRSD's current budgetary process does not meet the above requisites\" and ordered the Little Rock School District to \"sij)mit a revised 1991-92 budget which is directly correlated to the specific provisions of the settlement plan\" together with a long range budget projection and a long range revenue projection. On May 1, 1992 the District Court ordered the Little Rock School District to submit a revised budget. The Little Rock School District filed on June 1, 1992 a document titled \"LRSD Projected Revenue and Expense - 1992/93 -- 1996/97\". The Little Rock School District revised its budget projections based upon then current information and suppEed the revised budget projections to the District Court on July 31, 1992. The Little Rock School District also filed a special status report which contained the budget proposal for the 1992-93 school year which had been approved by the Board. FoUowing an August 3, 1992 hearing to discuss the Little Rock School District budget, the District Court issued an order on August 4 approving the proposed reductions except the elunination of a seventh period at McClellan Community High School. The 2Court also notified the Little Rock School District that it would require that music teacher positions in the seventh period at Henderson Junior High School be restored for the 1993-94 academy year. The Court promised that a more detailed order which would explain the Court's reasoning would follow. The detailed order was filed on December 30, 1992. The December order explained that the budget reductions made for the 1992-93 school year \"will all be monitored closely and may have to be restored if the Court determines the cuts are having a negative impact on the district's desegregation efforts\". The Court required the Little Rock School District to submit any future proposed budget changes to the Court and directed the Little Rock School District not to implement any changes prior to the Court's approval. The Court provided some insight into how future budget reduction proposals will be reviewed. For example, the Court expressed concern \"about the district's decisions to tamper with popular programs like gifted and talented, music, magnet features, and eliminating staff at schools that are successful (such as the established magnets) and those schools trying to be successful (such as the incentive schools and the new magnets, McClellan and Henderson).\" The Court also expressed concern about the impact of budget proposals on teacher morale and reductions which put the Little Rock School District at risk of non-compliance with State standards or statutes. The District Court also entered an order on November 5 concerning the impact of the 1992-93 budget reductions upon the magnet schools. The Court directed Little Rock School District to reinstate certain positions of the magnet schools and to present to the Court prior to pre-registration any changes in the magnet schools contemplated for the 1993-94 school year. Following the Board's decision on January 28, 1993 not to pursue a grant application to fund an Aerospace Technology School, the District Court notified the Little Rock School District that the hearing scheduled for February 1, 1993 to consider the Aerospace grant would instead be directed toward \"other issues of concern to the Court\". Ar. that hearing, the Court expressed concern about the Little Rock School District's commitment to complying with its desegregation plan. The Court was particularly concerned that our budget make it difficult to discern budget priorities and to monitor spending on implementation of the desegregation plan. The Court emphasized the need for good faith compliance with the desegregation plan in order for the Little Rock School District to eventually be released from District Court supervision and also emphasized that the Little Rock School District should make clear to the community that the desegregation plan is something to which we are committed. The result of the hearing is that the District Court will take a more active role in directing and monitoring the budget process and that the Little Rock School District will be required to hire one additional person to work on the budget. I have ordered a transcript of the hearing and you are all welcome to review it once it has been prepared. aU previous hearings if anyone would like to review them). (I have transcripts of almost 3There will be a hearing at 9:30 a.m. on Friday, March 19, 1993 to review the effects of the Little Rock School District 1992-93 budget cuts which were addressed by the District Court in its December 30, 1992 order. The has Court asked me to remind you of its continuing concern about the Little Rock School District's budget process and to encourage you to attend the March 19, 1993 hearing. It would be helpful to review in advance of the hearing the budget cuts adopted by the Board this summer, together with the District Court's August 4 and December 30, 1992 orders concerning those cuts. I will continue to forward all orders to Dr. Bernd as soon as I receive them for immediate distribution to the Board. I will also provide periodic written reports to the Board concerning the legal proceedings in this case. 4IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION ay' LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT vs. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL ORDER FILED U.S DlSTniCT COURT eastern D1STR!*T ARKANSAS JUN J^1993 MS, CLERK IT PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS The Court has scheduled a hearing in this case for June 24, 1993 and ordered the members of the Little Rock School District Board of Directors to be present. The Little Rock School District C16RK R/^ has filed a motion to excuse board members Patricia Gee and O.G. Jacovelli from the hearing on grounds that Ms. Jacovelli is currently hospitalized and recovering from surgery, while Ms. Gee is required to appear in the District Court of Kay County, Oklahoma. Upon careful consideration, the Court finds that the motion should be and hereby is granted. A review session for board members Patricia Gee and O.G. Jacovelli will be scheduled by separate order of the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED this day of June 1993. STATES DI st: CT JUDGE  - JOCU.MCHr Ei'ITERED ON ^CKET SHEET IN COMPLIANCE ON WITH RU' P !Y p/OR 79^) FRCP FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK HERSCHEL H. FRIDAY, P.A. ROBERT V. LIGHT, WILLIAM H. SUTTON, P.A. JAMES W . MOORE BYRON M. EISEMAN. JR.. P.A. JOE D. BELL. P.A. JOHN C. ECHOLS, P.A. JAMES A. 8UTTRY, P.A. PREDERICK S. URSERY, P.A. A PARTNERSHIP OF INDIVIDUALS AND PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2000 FIRST COMMERCIAL BUILDING 400 WEST CAPITOL H.T. LARZELERE, P.A. OSCAR E, OAVIS. JR,. P.A. LITTLE ROCK. ARKANSAS 72201-3493 JAMES C. CLARK, JR.. P.A. THOMAS P. LEGGETT, P.A. JOHN DEWEY WATSON. P.A PAUL 8. BENHAM III. P.A. larry W. BURKS. P.A. TELEPHONE 501-376-2011 FAX NO. 601-376-2147 A WYCKLIFF NISBET. JR.. P.A. JAMES EDWARD HARRIS, P.A. J PHILLIP MALCOM. P.A. JAMES M. SIMPSON. P.A. MEREDITH P. CATLETT, P.A. June 23, 1993 JAMES M. SAXTON. P.A. J- SHEPHERD RUSSELL III. P. DONALD H. BACON, P.A. WILLIAM THOMAS BAXTER. P WALTER A. PAULSON II. P.A. BARRY E. COPLIN. P.A. Richard d. Taylor, p.a. JOSEPH 8 HURST. JR.. p.A. ELIZABETH J. ROBBEN. P.A. CHRISTOPHER HELLER P A LAURA HENSLEY SMITH. P.A ROBERT S. SHAFER. P.A. WILLIAM M. GRIFFIN III. P.A Thomas n. rose. p.a. Michael s. moore. p a Diane s. mackey, p.a. WALTER M. EBEL III. P.A. KEVIN A. CRASS. P.A. WILLIAM A. WADDELL. JR.. P A CLYDE -TAB' TURNER. P.A. CALVIN J. HALL, P.A. SCOTT J. LANCASTER. P.A JERRY L. MALONE. P.A. M. GAYLE CORLEY. P.A. ROBERT 8 BEACH, JR.. P A J. LEE BROWN, P.A. JAMES C. BAKER. JR . P A H. CHARLES GSCHWENO, JR.. P A HARRY A. LIGHT. P.A. SCOTT H. TUCKER. P.A. JOHN CLAYTON RANDOLPH. P.A. GUY ALTON WADE PRICE C. GARDNER THOMAS F. MEEKS J. MICHAEL PICKENS TONIA P. JONES DAVID 0. WILSON JEFFREY M. MOORE T. WESLEY HOLMES ANDREW T. TURNER SARAH J. HEFFLEY JOHN RAY WHITE DAVID M. GRAF PAMELA O. PERCEFULL CARLA G. SPAINHOUR JOHN C. FENDLEY.JR. COUNSEL WILLIAM J. SMITH WILLIAM A. ELDREDGE. JR.. P.A. B.S. CLARK WILLIAM L. TERRY WILLIAM L. PATTON. JR.. P A.  ITEM'* DIRECT NO. (601) 370-1606 Honorable Susan Webber Wright United States District Judge U.S. Post Office \u0026amp; Courthouse 600 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 received JUN 2 4 1993 Re\nLRSD V. PCSSD Case No. LR-C-82-866 Office of Desegregation Monitoring Dear Judge Wright: Little Rock School District Board Members Bill Hamilton and John Riggs are out of the state in connection with our search for a new superintendent. They are scheduled to return Wednesday evening, but asked me to advise you that any unexpected delay in their travel plans could result in their being late for the hearing scheduled for Thursday, June 24, 1993. Yours very truly, Christopher Heller CJH/k cc: All Counsel of Record I R I? JUN 2 9 1993 PILED  Oitico of Oo^ V' i''.cn !9 ^'^kansas UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION CARLR, 2 5 133J clerk ^P- CLERK LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, PLAINTIFF, vs. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL., INTERVENORS, MRS. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL., INTERVENORS. ORDER Pending before the Court is the motion of the Little Rock School District (LRSD) requesting that School Board President John E. Moore be excused from attendance at hearings scheduled in this case for June 24, July 7, and July 8, 1993. Attorney Moore states that he must be absent on the 24th of June because he must attend a seminar to earn credits toward the required Continuing Legal Education hours that each Arkansas attorney must obtain each year. He further states that he must be absent on July 7 and July 8, 1993 because of trials scheduled in state court. The Court is familiar with the Continuing Legal Education requirements. Further, the Court assumes that since Mr. Moore is an officer of the Court (as an attorney licensed in this District) as well as a School Board Member, that he is being truthful with the Court and is acting in good faith. Mr. Moore is therefore excused from the June 24, July 7, and July 8 hearings. He must, however, attend the review sessions that are to be scheduled on these hearings. The Court would further require that he discuss the contents of those hearings with his fellow Board Members and with the School District attorney. I It is so ordered this day of June, 1993. -2, tates District Judge DOCKET SHeP IN this L - COMPLIANCE ON -2- DOCUME^^Wf IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION CAfli. yy - 1 J393 K LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFFS No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ORDER The Court has scheduled a budget hearing for the PCSSD and the CLfl^ vs. LRSD on July 7th and 8th, 1993. This Order is to inform the members of the Little Rock School District Board of Directors that they will not be required to be present on Wednesday, July 7th, since the hearing on that day will primarily cover the budget for the PSCCD. However, there is a possibility that the hearing regarding PCSSD's budget could conclude on the afternoon of the 7th, in which case the Court would immediately begin the hearing on the budget for the LRSD. Therefore, the LRSD board members may desire to attend the afternoon session on Wednesday, July 7th, although they are not required to do so. The board members will, however, be required to attend the hearing on the budget for the LRSD on Thursday, July 8th, and there is a possibility that the hearing will continue into the morning of Friday, July 9th, which also will require the presence of the board members. The parties are put on notice that should the hearing not be completed during the morning of July 9th, the matter will possibly be continued into the following week. The Pulaski Association of Classroom Teachers (PACT) has filed a motion to quash the subpoena of Sandra Roy [doc.#1870], Executive Director of PACT, on grounds that she has made prior travel plans and her testimony is not essential to the hearings on July 7th and Sth, 1993. PACT has also filed a motion for a continuance of the hearings on July 7th and Sth, 1993 [doc.#1871] on grounds that it will not have an adequate opportunity to prepare for any testimony that might be given by PACT in support of certified raises for Pulaski County Special School District teachers for the 1992-93 school year. For good cause shown, the motion to quash the subpoena of Sandra Roy is granted. The motion for a continuance, however, is denied. The Court has asked the PCSSD to explain how it can continue to fund its desegregation obligations, not whether it can justify the increase in teachers' salaries. Should justification for the increase in teachers' salaries become an issue, the Court will schedule a separate hearing on that issue. IT IS SO ORDERED this 1st day of July 1993. UNITED STATES DISTRI'CT JUDGE -OMPLIANCE.WTTH RULE 5S AN, docket SHEET IN ON y-/-^ BY R 79(a) FRCP HLED M-S. district cm mv IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION 0 1993 I I I I I I I LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT VS. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL 301 1 2 1993 ORDER ncc/^rsi DEP. CtEflK PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS The Court has scheduled a hearing in this case for July 7 and 8, 1993 and ordered the members of the Little Rock School District Board of Directors to be present. In addition, the Court has informed the parties that this matter may be continued on July 9, 1993 and into the following week. The Little Rock School District (LRSD) has filed a motion [doc.#1884] to excuse board members Dr. Katherine Mitchell and O.G. Jacovelli from the hearing on grounds that Dr. Mitchell is out of the State from June 28 to July 11 to attend conferences in connection with her work as President of Shorter College, while Ms. Jacovelli is currently hospitalized and recovering from surgery. The LRSD has also filed a motion [doc.#1880] asking that board member Dorsey Jackson be excused from the hearing on July 8, 1993 at 3:45 pB. in order to attend a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Centers for Youth and Families, and a motion [doc.#1889] to excuse board member Bill Hamilton on Friday, July 9 at 10:30 a.m. in order to attend a funeral, after which he will return to court. 18 9 2 I I I -I I (Finally, the LRSD has filed a supplemental motion [doc.#1890] to excuse board member John Moore from the budget hearing on July 8 and 9, 1993. Upon careful consideration, the Court finds that each of these motions should be and hereby is granted. A review session for these board members will be scheduled by separate order of the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED this day of July 1993. united 'STATfS DISTRI ITRICT JUDGE THIS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET BM COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 58 AND/OR 7(a) FRCP ONP fl p WSTc\nijD\n5TRfcT,\n)^LsAS '\u0026lt;^UL 2 1 1995 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION carl R i3^E\n\\jTQ, Sy-. CLl:RK L:~f. Ci. hX LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, PLAINTIFF, I I vs. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, I i MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL., INTERVENORS, V MRS. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL., INTERVENORS. ORDER Little Rock School Board Members Pat Gee, Kathrine Mitchell and John Moore were excused, for good cause shown, from attendance at recent hearings in this case. After consultation with these Board Members and with counsel for the District, Jerry Malone, a hearing has been set for 10:00 a.m. on Friday, July 30, 1993, to review the matters discussed at the missed hearings with these Board Members. It is so ordered this \u0026lt;?'! day of July, 1993. I I United States ates District Jud Judge THIS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET IN ICE WITH RULE 58 AND/OR 79(a) FRCP I I I COMPL)^^ITHj ON BY J ! IUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Eastern District of Arkansas Office of the Clerk P.O. Box 869 Little Rock, Arkansas 72203-0869 Carl R. Brents Clerk July 19, 1993 Gerald M. Parsons Chief Deputy Clerk Mr. Michael E. Gans, Clerk United States Court of Appeals 1114 Market Street St. Louis, MO 63103 Case No. LR-C-82-866 Re: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT vs. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL . DISTRICT, ETC ET AL Dear Sir: Enclosed please find in duplicate, copies of the following in the above case: Notice of Appeal [certified] Docket Entries (certified] Order filed 6/17/93 Sincerely, Carl R. Brents, Clerk By: i Doris Collins, Deputy Clerk cc: w/encs. All Counsel of Record IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS c WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL NOTICE OF APPEAL JUL i 6 1555, PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS Notice is hereby given that plaintiff Little Rock School District appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit from the Order finding that \"problems currently besetting the district would justify the imposition of a I I 1 I receivership\" and requiring each Member of the Little Rock School District Board of Directors to be present at all hearings in the Little Rock School Desegregation case unless given specific permission to be absent, entered in this case on June 17, 1993. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 I I BY Christopher Hell I 1 R^CEiven JUL 1 9 1993 Office of Desegregation Monitoring IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS NOTICE OF APPEAL Notice is hereby given that plaintiff Little Rock School District appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit from the Order finding that It problems currently besetting the district would justify the imposition of V. 1 a receivership\" and requiring each Member of the Little Rock School District Board of Directors to be present at all hearings in the Little Rock School Desegregation case unless given specific permission to be absent, entered in this case on June 17, 1993. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 BY Christopher HellCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Notice of Appeal has been served on the following counsel of record by depositing copy of same in the United States mail on this 16th day of July, 1993: Mr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Norman Chachkin LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 99 Hudson Street New York, N.Y. 10013 Mr. Richard Roachell MITCHELL \u0026amp; ROACHELL, P.A. 1014 West Third Little Rock, AR 72201 1 I i 1 1 i 07-2'=\u0026gt; 1^993 07:20 \"ALKER RALPH WASHJNGTriN .mark BrRNETJE '' RRAWIDN, JR. AUSTIN porter. .\nii * AlfloadriHt^lo Fnirtw h FROM JOHN U.UALKEP P.fi. in (inwcu tt Ibn I'\u0026gt;nfnr. i.-tJumhi, TO 3710100 P . 02 r f H r . JOHN w. Walker, p.a. Attorney At l.aw 1723 BKoArnvAV Litile R(k:k. Arkansas 72206 Telephone (.501) .374-3758 FAX (.501) .374-4187 July 29, 1993 Mr. John Moore, President Little Rock School District 610 West Markham Little Rock, AR Dear Mr. Moore: I 1 Board 72201 Re\nDr. Henry Williams vjj n  ^1 morning's paper William's schedule, ------- .. it which set out Dr Henry t, scneauie, appears that Pha ------  capriciously omitted from his itinerLv t Intervenors 'versight and surely the Board of assume that is an with us. This is so blcaX the most . to meet District is implementation of its dSL?^ Problem facing the are the principal party. man ... him, except for the The other are urgent problem desegregation plan to which we  groups which will meet with ODM, are only minlmV117 involV^d^f at:?! ^Jt^ .JStSuSnS whTi^s^a? V a^sle^TarZ Tf h^ghi^t^r^oX constituencyrTglt^ShSr^' ' that litigation. defamation of constitutional rights, components of the school board' to have had we Would you please let meeting by Joshua e to include at leaest representatives with him. arrange an hour Thank you for your cooperation. sincerely yours, JtVW: j s cc\nmembers receive Dr. f v W( 'hn w. Walker Matthis (with the a Henry Williams copy Ms. Ann Brown Mr. Jerry Malone XtamwMiMaEWff TOTAL P.02 ESS i. d i. 11 I eanaFRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK HERSCHEL H. FRIDAY. P.A. ROBERT V. LIGHT. P.A. WILLIAM H. SUTTON. P.A. JAMES W. MOORE BYRON M. EISEMAN. JR.. P.A. JOE D. BELL. P.A. JOHN C. ECHOLS. P.A. JAMES A. BUTTRY. P.A. FREDERICK S. URSERY. P.A. H.T. LARZELERE. P.A. OSCAR E. DAVIS. JR. JAMES C. CLARK. JR., P.A. THOMAS P. LEGGETT. P.A. JOHN DEWEY WATSON. P.A. PAUL 8. BENHAM III, P.A. LARRY W. BURKS. P.A. A. WYCKLIFF NISBET. JR.. P.A. JAMES EDWARD HARRIS. P.A. J. PHILLIP MALCOM. P.A. JAMES M. SIMPSON. P.A. MEREDITH P. CATLETT. P.A. JAMES M. SAXTON. P.A. J. SHEPHERD RUSSELL III DONALD H. BACON. P.A. WILLIAM THOMAS BAXTER. P.A. WALTER A. PAULSON II. P.A. BARRY E. COPLIN. P.A. RICHARD 0. TAYLOR. P.A. JOSEPH B. HURST. JR.. P.A. ELIZABETH J. ROBBEN. P.A. CHRISTOPHER HELLER. P.A. LAURA HENSLEY SMITH. P.A. ROBERT S. SHAFER. P.A. WILLIAM M. GRIFFIN III. P.A. THOMAS N. ROSE. P.A. MICHAEL 8. MOORE A PARTNERSHIP OF INDIVIDUALS ANO PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2000 FIRST COMMERCIAL BUILDING 400 WEST CAPITOL LITTLE ROCK. ARKANSAS 72201-3493 TELEPHONE 501-376-201 1 FAX NO. 601-376-2147 August 4, 1993 RECEIVED DIANE S. MACKEY. P.A. WALTER M. EBEL III. P.A. KEVIN A. CRASS. P.A. WILLIAM A. WAOOELL. JR.. P.A CLYDE *TAB' TURNER. P.A. CALVIN J. HALL. P.A. SCOTT J. LANCASTER. P.A. JERRY L. MALONE. P.A. M. GAYLE CORLEY. P.A. ROBERT B. BEACH. JR.. P.A. J. LEE BROWN, P.A. JAMES C. BAKER. JR.. P.A. H. CHARLES GSCHWEND. JR.. P.A. HARRY A. LIGHT. P.A. SCOTT H. TUCKER JOHN CLAYTON RANDOLPH GUV ALTON WADE PRICE C. GARDNER THOMAS F. MEEKS J. MICHAEL PICKENS TONIA P. JONES DAVtO 0. WILSON JEFFREY H. MOORE T. WESLEY HOLMES ANDREW T. TURNER SARAH J. HEFFLEY JOHN RAY WHITE ceuMtci AUG 5 1993 WILLIAM J. SMITH WILLIAM A. ELDREDGE. JR.. P.A. B.S. CLARK WILLIAM L. TERRY WILLIAM L. PATTON. JR., P.A. VNITCR* OmiCT MO. (601) 370-1566 Mr. Carl Brents, Clerk United States District Court U.S. Post Office \u0026amp; Courthouse 600 W. Capitol Avenue, Room 402 Office of Desegregation Monitoring Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al U.S.D.C., Eastern District, No. LR-C-82-866 Dear Mr. Brents: Please find enclosed the original and one copy of a Motion to Excuse Board Member From Hearing on behalf of the Little Rock School District which I would ask you to file in the above- referenced matter. A self-addressed, stamped envelope has been enclosed for your use in returning a filed-marked copy of the Motion to me. By copy of this letter I am forwarding a copy of this pleading to all counsel of record. Kindest regards. Sincerely yours. Frederick S. Ursery FSU/dkf Enclosures cc: Mr. John Walker w/enclosure Mr. Sam Jones w/enclosure Mr. Steve Jones w/enclosure Mr. Richard Roachell w/enclosure Ms. Ann Brown w/enclosureIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS MOTION TO EXCUSE BOARD MEMBER FROM HEARING For its motion, the Little Rock School District (LRSD) states: 1. The court has scheduled a hearing in this case for August 12 and 13, 1993. The members of the Little Rock School District Board of Directors are required to attend the hearing. 2. LRSD board member John Moore requests to be excused from the hearing in order to attend a jury trial in which he is the defense attorney in a case which is scheduled to start in the Independence County Circuit Court in Batesville on August 11 and continue through August 12, 1993. 3. Also he is currently scheduled to attend with his family an Arkansas Association of Defense Counsel seminar in Dallas, Texas on August 13 and 14, 1993. He is booked on a flight which is scheduled to leave Little Rock on the morning of August 13, 1993. 4. Attached hereto in support of the motion are the following items:(a) Letter from the Case Coordinator of the Independence County Circuit Court dated January 27, 1993, setting the case for trial during August 9 through 13, 1993. (b) A letter from John Moore of July 30, 1993, to the Case Coordinator confiirming that the case will start on the afternoon of August 11, 1993. (c) A copy of the airline ticket for a trip to Dallas on August 13. (d) A copy of an agenda for the Arkansas Association of Defense Counsel meeting for August 13 and 14 in Dallas, Texas. WHEREFORE, for the reasons set out above, LRSD prays for an order excusing Mr. Moore from attending the August 12 and 13, 1993 hearing. Respectfully submitted. FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Street Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 Attorneys for Little Rock School District By: FREDERICK S. URSERY, #67055 2CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion to Excuse Board Member From Hearing has been served on the following by depositing copy of same in the United States mail on this 4th day of August, 1993: Mr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell and Streett First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 FREDERIC URSERY 3JOHN E. MOORE Huckabay, Munson, Rowlett \u0026amp; Tilley, P.A. LAW OFFICES FIRST COMMERCIAL BUILDING 400 WEST CAPITOL. SUITE 1900 LITTLE ROCK. ARKANSAS 72201 (501) 374-6535 FAX (SOU 374-5906 July 30, 1993 Ms. Donna Sullivan Case Coordinator Post Office Box 329 Mountain View, Arkansas 72560 RE: Kirby vs. Cameron Mutual Insurance Co. Independence Circuit No. CIV-91-338 Dear Ms. Sullivan: This conf inns our telephone conversation on July 30, 1993, in which you advised we would pick a jury on the above case Monday morning. August 9, 1993, and begin with the trial at 1:00 p.m. on Wednesday, August 11, 1993. I look forward to seeing you then. Ji E. Moore Sinc^ely, JEM/tbr cc: Mr. Jerry Post 5336 JOHN DAN KEMP CIRCUIT JUDGE P.O. BOX 329 mountain view, ar 72560 (SOI) 269-6989 FAX 269-8964 Circuit Court SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT INDEPENDENCE. CLEBURNE. STONE. IZARD AND FULTON COUNTIES January 27, 1993 FAY OILBECK COURT REPORTER PHONE 793-M13 DONNA SULUVAN CASE COORDINATOR PHONE 2e9-9e9 Mr. Jerry Post Attorney at Law P.O. Box 2595 Batesville*,- AR 72503 KE: Kirby v. Cameron Mutual Ins.Co. Independence County CIV 91-338 Dear Mr. Post: This will confirm that the above case is set for trial during the August 9th-13th, 1993, jury term in Batesville. Sunc^ely, Donna Sullivan DS/s cc: Mr. John E. Moore I? JAN28I993 ISSUED BY ANO VALID OHLY ON  ^SOUTHWEST AIRLINES . 19 nmiat anoiOR coupons FOR RELated.Chm PASSENGER TICKET AND BAGGAGE CHECK L. nc rwdTBAf^T HM REVERSE SIDE SUBJECT TO COHOITlONS OF CONTRACT ON ISSUED SY ANO VALtO ONLY 0 ' ^SOUTHWEST AIRLINES . k\u0026lt;9t a norm anoor coufons fon related charoes  Ufi22SSaSP5?X5S^ tokHaoeweh scieo or w exiendco l!S5SSSSSioET!MK^ro^tT^^ I SSSSn iSSomSIS^ niwSiE io Of cou,Af bsuo okd NO REfUHO ON LOST TICKETS lx s r 6T0NATURE OF CARDHOLDER FLIGHT COUPON 1 oS Touncooe 5O30t,\"ra oosflasHasas ifS'rttyOTErraroHN DATTBir (TOORTT^OHN I'LITTLE ROCK AR HOI TRANSFERABLE sziTTSTymi ITINERARY O\" f-. vr^trv I, V *SisniCKET DESiQNATOfl OTACLAS LOVE FIELD HKIF' . _______________ ISSUED IN EXCHANGE FOR I Efg H ig^HGiaiTOA OK*\"\" aWnffS ' LITDALHN 13'A*UG13'AG' CONJUNCTION TICKETS ODALLITHN a3H 13AUG 81 SHH 15AUG I ***** e 5prTnrenrrRES check-in and * if TRAVEL WITH COMPANION * FP TBM/CCIRS3m3Q3abDlDlb5M JOHN Luth. CODE: DaSObU FC LIT UN DAL71.82HXR UN LITALS 4HUR 116.36 *** E MOORE EXP Ob/TS ** !! UTH. code: SOtU FC USD TIS TAX lib.3b 11. bM Ml SC TICKET'EfT MAIL STOCK CONTROL HO. TX 4 CK nno7A77nn7? I CRN ALLOW PCS WT UNCKO DOCUMENT NUMBER CK 1 55b 510M7blD01i 0 I ***** ** *\u0026gt;* CHECR-IN REQUIRED 1 sab SlDMTblOOl Seminar Details Program Highlights ( Agenda Friday, August 13 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. 1:00 to 1:45 p.m. 1:45 to 5:00 p.m. 5:30 to 7:00 p.m. Saturday, August 14 8:45 to 9:30 a.m. 9:30 to 11:30 a m, 11:30 to 11:45 a,m, 6:30 p,m, 7:00 p.m.  f \"Trial Strategy and Techniques\" presented by James McElhaney, Professor of Law Registration What You Need to Know about the Americans with Disabilities Act Trial Strategies and Techniques Reception for the President-Elect Proposed Changes in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure .  How to Practice Law and Handle Stress ' Business Meeting Bus Leaves for the Cowboys Game Kickoff - Cowboys versus Raiders Hotel Accommodations Hotel rooms are available at The Westin Hotel in the Galleria for $88 per night (single occupancy) or $98 per night (double occupartcy). To reserve a room, call the Westin at 214-934-9494 and be sure to tell them you are with the Arkansas Association of Defense Counsel. Gfo F\u0026amp;S'S -CeA\u0026lt;**^  Registration I 4^ The cost of the seminar is $90 per registrant through August 1 and $ 100 per registrant thereafter. The spouse / guest fee is $25 and children are free. To register, please detach the registration form at the right and mail it and a check made payable to Arkansas Association of Defense Counsel to: Michael R. Mayton First Commercial Building, Suite 1700 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Registration will last from 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. on FridcQA------- August 13. Those who have not pre-registered may do so at this time. The fee includes all seminar materials and the reception. Travel Arrangements American Airlines is offering special rates for the meeting. To take advantage of the discounted fares, call American at 1-800-433-1790 between 7:00 a.m. and 12:00 a.m., daily, and refer to Meeting Number 0283HA. Continuing Legal Education The application process is underway for approximately five hours of CLE credit. Case Western Reserve University, School of Law James McElhaney is North America's most widely road author on the art of trial advocacy. Ho is author of McElhaney's Trial Notebook Secot^Edition (LS87, Amarican Bar Association), columnist for the ABA Journal's popular monthly feature \"Litigation\", and writes \"Trial Notebook\" lot Litigatiort Journal. As one of tha country's premier lecturers on evidence and trial :. practice, ho is consistently applauded tor his creative, energetic and elfoctiva teaching style. J \"How to Practice Law and Handle Stress\" ' presented by T. L. \"Pete\" Caudle, III Pete Caudle is a Dallas lawyer and frequent lecturer on numerous topics dealing with stress manag\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eLittle Rock School District\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_253","title":"Board of Education members","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1991/2006"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","School board members","School boards"],"dcterms_title":["Board of Education members"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/253"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["correspondence","clippings (information artifacts)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nB5032302 Date: March 23, 1995 To: Fred Smith From: Bill Mooney Subject: Finance Analysis Model We both know that the financial situation of the district makes sound decision-making critical to the future. .As resources become increasingly strained, decision-makers operate with less margin for error. The chance of making a good decision is increased by having useful information readily available. The main purpose of the Program Budget Document is to link program accomplishments with program expenditures so we would have better information to guide the district. We must always seek better ways of collecting data and analyzing it into useful information. One of the better ways might be the Finance Analysis Model. I want to share the attached pamphlet with you, and get your thoughts into further investigation of this model. Since the model is PC-based, it could probably run in our existing environment. Such a tool might assist the administration. Board, and community in making better decisions. The model has something of a history around Little Rock. Last year, Ann Brown and I encouraged Gene Wilhoit to look into using the models forerunner, the Micro-Finance Model, statewide. Additionally, one of the authors of the model, Sheree Speakman, was the lead person on the Coopers \u0026amp; Lybrand study conducted for the district. I would bet she used some of her experience from that project as material for the model. Please read the pamphlet, then let me know what you think. I will be glad to help you in any way I can. Copy to: Ann Brown Hank Williams*! fu*:\nAPR 1 0 1995 Officu cf IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS . WESTERN DIVISION r AnAiAriSAo 95iPR-5 PM t*: L3 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 8Y. PLAINTIFF Ot^LST\nlRa V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS MOTION TO EXCUSE BOARD MEMBER FROM HEARING For its motion, the Little Rock School District (LRSD) states: 1. The court has scheduled hearings in this case for April 10, 1995 and June 8-9, 1995. The members of the Little Rock School District Board of Directors are required to attend the hearings. 2. LRSD board member John Riggs has previously made I arrangements to host a trade association meeting on April 10, 1995 and to attend a National Security Seminar in Pennsylvania during the week of June 5-9, 1995. Documents reflecting these commitments are attached. LRSD requests that Mr. Riggs . b^ excused fr ths hearings. Mr. Riggs understands that he may be required to attend review sessions. WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, LRSD requests that board member John Riggs be excused from the court's order which requires his attendance April 10, 1995 and June 8-9, 1995. Respectfully submitted. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICTFRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Street Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 B Christopher He Bar No. 81083 er CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion to Excuse has been served on the following on this 6th day of April, 1995: Mr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell and Streett 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown Desegregation Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Elizabeth Boyter Arkansas Dept, of Education 4 State Capitol Mall Little Rock, AR 72201-1071 opher Heller c 2 APR-03-1995 11 = 55 FROn RIGGS ENG I Nt Di'-'. I u 50 f ^1595 x?SPRINGS!^ SOUTHEASTERN CATERPILLAR DEALERS PRODUCT SUPPORT ASSOCIATION March 31, 1995 PO BOX 1399 LITTLE ROCK. AR 72203 (501) 570-3100 J. A. Riggs Tractor Company Mr. John Riggs IV P. 0. Box 1399 Little Rock. AR 72203 Dear Mr. Riggs\nJ. A. Riggs Tractor Company is pleased to be hosting the 1995 Southeastern Caterpillar Dealers Product Support Association Meeting. This meeting is being held in Hot Springs, Arkansas beginning Sunday evening, April 9th and ending at noon on Tuesday, April 11th. You have been pre-registered for this meeting. Hotel reservations have been made for you, for Sunday night 4/9 and Mondiy-^/lO. The meeting will conclude Tuesday at noon. Please plan to be in Little Rock by 9:30 a.m. on Sunday at our store. We have a total of 120 people involved in this meeting and will require assistance from all Riggs personnel. We will have someone in charge of various responsibilities, transporting personnel from the Airport to Hot Springs, transporting personnel to the various activities and etc. You may be notified prior to the Sunday meeting for any assistance or assignment of responsibilities. If you are interested in attending the horse races at Oaklawn, contact Keith Riggs ASAP at extension 3536. Advance arrangements must be made. Wc want to be a good host and make our counterparts stay in our great state a pleasant experience. I know wc can count on you for whatever assistance is needed. We have an excellent meeting planned and should be very informative. See you Sunday morning April 9. Sincerely, PRESIDENT John Bennett I.A. Kisgs Ttjuoi Co. VICE PRESIDENT Sob McCarthy Stowers Mjirhinery Corp. John Bennett President Southeastern Caterpillar Dealer Product Support Association secretary/ TREASURER Bill Gregory Ubnehdrd Machinery Co. Winning Combinations 1x^00 TKun KlUUO ClNuiHC. Vi I u 30 fo^x^ r r. RfiPLVTO ATTeNTIONOF DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY UNITEO STATES ARMY WAR COLLEGE CARLISLE BARRACKS, PENNSYLVANIA 17013-5050 March 9, 1995 (if 50* B Iq '^1 Office of the Commandant Mr. John A. Riggs, IV 3600 Foxcroft Little Rock, Arkansas 72207 Dear T4r. Riggs: We are delighted to invite you to participate in the 41st Annual National Security Seminar at the U.S. Army War College, Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania, from June 5-9, 1995. Each year we cap our academic program by inviting leading citizens from throughout the United States to discuss national security issues with our students in a week-long seminar. The focus for these discussions is provided by four nationally prominent speakers who will address international, domestic, defense, and economic/environmental issues as they relate to the welfare and security of the United States. The enclosed Prospectus outlines the objectives and organization of the Seminar and provides basic information on our College, its students, and the faculty. Briefly, the purpose of the Anny War College is to prepare a select group of officers to assume positions of great responsibility in the Army and throughout the defense community. A major portion of this preparation focuses on developing a deeper understanding of the society they serve, and the interests, issues, and trends that influence the formulation of national security policy. Over the years, the National Security Seminar has been an outstanding academic exercise. The participation of leading citizens from across the country has made that possible. You will be our guest ft^r die period of tlie National Security Seminar. You will have a student escort and we will provide all meals, lodging, and transportation at the Seminar site. Unfortunately, we are not able to pay for your travel to and from Carlisle. You may obtain additional information on these arrangements by writing to us at the above address, or calling the National Security Seminar Office at 717/245-3321. Pnmed onRecycietf Papv . RPR-03-1995 11 = 56 FROM RIGGS ENGlNt Diti. 30 rox.x\u0026lt; I I u -2- We have enclosed several forms which we ask you to complete. The first is a postcard acknowledging your commitment to attend. Please respond by the date indicated. If you are able to join us in June, we also ask that you complete a biographical form (Mail or FAX-717/245-3530) so that our students and other guests will know who you are. We will consider the returned biographical form as consent to maintain your name on the National Security Seminar Guest List file. Applicable Privacy Act data arc on the reverse of that form. We hope you will be able to join us. Il is important to our Army that our students have an opportunity to know your views on issues that impact on the welfare and security of our country. They need to understand your priorities and concerns. While we are not unmindful of the travel costs, you will find the Seminar very interesting and Carlisle Barracks and south-central Pennsylvania strikingly beautiful in June. Please join us for the experience. Sinccrely, Richard A. Ctiilcoat Major General, U.S. Anny Conunandant Enclosures i TOTAL P.04FILED COURT eastern district ARKANSAS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION AP 7 1995 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. ORDER JAMESjy^^RMACK CLERK -a PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS Before the Court is a motion to excuse John Riggs, a member of the Little Rock School District Board of Directors, from the budget hearings scheduled for April 10, 1995 and June 8-9, 1995. For good cause, the motion is granted. so ORDERED this 'day of April 1995. TRICT/JJUUDD(GE 7^ !_ _ c docket sneer in RULE 58 ANOOR 79(aj SJi.' a 2 3 9 7 ( /rye\u0026lt;/ LRSD SUPTS OFFICE 718 P01 AUG 10 95 15:54 Little Rock School District 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LnTLEROCK,AR 72201 r SUPERINTENDENTS OFFICE FAX (501) 324-2146 I 1. DATE TO /a '3xZ4 3s \"1] FROM SENDERS PHONE # SUBJECT SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: /U ,  \u0026lt; No. of pages (including cover page) Fax Phone No. 3*7/\"^ Speed Dial 1 1^'  -Ui LPSD SLPTS OFFICE 718 P07 AUG 10 35 15:56 I ?5r COMSli^eD^TATeM^NT OFsRVtflU$^lxF^NDITVRfeS ANO IN ^UNJ V X X '%X- \u0026gt;* '\u0026gt; POATrtePEH'lo6sN0e0jDNe,3S J^ANPta^S IN ^UND SALANCE xf.-ZS\u0026gt;X:XjxSx*^x*-.\n. ,. --xftwx - V\nAPPROVED I RECEIPTS 1993/94 06/30/94 COLLECTED iREVENUE-LOCAL SOURCES CURRENTTAXES DELINQUENT TAXES 40% PULLBACK___________ EXCESS TREASURER S FEE 41,027,982 4,502,692 21,420,949 145,eo x\u0026lt;x DRAFT 7 1994/95 * RECEIPTS 'S8',5S-  ! . 1 06/30/95 COLLECTED ! DEPOSITORY INTEREST !~revenue in lieu of taxes i MISCELLANEOUS AND RENTS INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS ATHLETIC RECEIPTS Bl 3-X-X Si\nrii REVENUE - COUNTY SOURCES COUNTY general SEVERANCE TAX roii'\na:a ( h 303,000 245,162 484,050 350,000 102,874 73,419 is.OOO REVENUE - STATE SOURCES MFPA SETTLEMENT PROCEEDS 25,350,138 8,094,112 i SETTLEMENT LOAN I VOCATIONAL________________ ! HANDICAPPED CHILDREN iORPHAN CHILDREN________ J^RLY CHILDHOOD transportation INCENTIVE FUNDS - M TO M ADULT EDUCATION ____ COMPENSATORY EDUCATION SUMMER SCHOOL__________ WORKER S COMPENSATION r is 'X^s'^s i REVENUE - OTHER SOURCES ^PUBLIC LAW 874 [^TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUND i TRANSFER FROM BOND ACCT ITRANSFER FROM MAGNET FUN P REVENUE - OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS i MAGNET SCHOOLS 1.341,887 1,210.000 ' 3,540 240,873 ' 2,700,000 2,883,425 ' 768,715 575,435 j 40,000 1,250,000 500,000 6,l88,199j\n13,930.088 ' i 39,625,387 5,666,289 22,011,928 146,379 333,970 182,353 194,465 265.622 74,416 96.58% 125.84% 102.76% 100.47% 110.22% 74.38% 40.17% 75.89% 72.34% 38,600,327 4,802,692 21,420,949 145,000 325,000 180,000 220,892 322,232 ' 102,005 40,330,355 5,030,840 ' 22,372,541 I 154,473! 5^345 'l57.38s' 280.904 I------ 104 48% 104.75% 104 44% 106.53% 162.21 3 !6%x 14^ 87.449 127.17% 487,906 115,^4J 151,41% 113.6736 T fog\u0026lt;gs.% I I 73,210 99.72%i 98.6'l%t 7^419 108,747 18,000 20,299 ! 148.12%! 1 24,710,980 8.094,112 1,382,418 1.282.804 3,198 263,992 3,553,095 2,720,581 792,081 517,260 29,969 1.228,696 6,262.966 13.301,449 97.48% 26.162,235 100.00% 103.02% 106.02% 90.34% 109.60% 131.60% 94.35% 103.04%' 89.89% 6,042,591 1,600,000 ' 1,320,000 1,344 499 3,198 } 233,992 [ 3,700,000 ! 3,100,000 I 797,893 580,435 367,319 26,499,961 6.042,591\n101.29%! 100.00% -------------------- 1,141,688 !__ 1,379,7O4T e,984~l' 233.992 3,786.987 2,831,743 811,822 565,922 428,361 528,051 iissL 86 49% 102,62% 218.39% 100.00% 102 35% 91.35% 101.75% 97.5094 143.76% 74.92%l QU 'anZtT 98.30%! 60.699 + 38.000 500,000 900,000 716.116 23.773 I 511,,561 I t 67.82% 102.31% 735,687 102.7$% jS?,10% 1O1.21! 95.15% -ii 6.107,922 I 6.406.502 14.236,l^ 13,542,343 340 104.89% 95.12%i -.5I sa r. LOCAL COUNTY STATE OTHER TOTAL INCOME BEGINNING BALANCE BUDGETTOTAL EXPENCHTLIRra SALARIES 1 EMPLOYEE benefits ' PURCHASED SERVICES f MATERIALS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES CAPITAL OUTLAY \"__ ' OTHER objects' DEBT SERVICE TOTAL EXPENDITUBES FUND BALANCE CONTINGENCY UNDESIGNATED ENDING BALANCE BUDGET TOTAL a LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT GENERAL FUNO BUDGET SUMMARY FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1995 euo^\n66,119,097 91,419 45,252,162 2,154,116 113,616,794 4,164.563 117.SO1.157 APPROVED: 73.341,379 10,338,688 13,170,903' 3,273.118 2,644.992 5,504,406 6,533,631' 116,607,317 _____JO 993,840 993,840 117.801,167 69.457,703 129,046 44.257,796 1.273,021 115,117,566 kslj u FORECASTED\nsJRqjEQTW IN(X)M\u0026amp; 69,457.703 _____ 129,046' 44,257.796 _____1,273.021 115.117,'56 pfiOitEijrgp 3,338,606 37,627 (994,366) (831,095) 1,600,772 T) in in ' DISBURSEMENT 74,328,796 10,127.412* 12,285,606 3,200,799 1,934,494 5,592.513 ___ 8,647.933 116,117,553 EH^MBEiANCe FOH^STEO PROJECTED mjieetiaj (T) C-i n n o EXreNawREs tfAX^ 74,326,796 10,127,412 \" 12,285,606 3,200,799 1,934,494 5,592.513 8,647.933 116,117.553 (937,417) 211,476 885.297 72.319 710,498 ' (88,107) (114,302) 689,764 _______0 3,194,376 3,184,376 -J m n o w g 1 \u0026lt;s iX' JI cn in cn IW!JIU!L,,?\u0026lt;2222^ LRSD SUPT'S OFFICE 71R P04 AUG 10 95 15:57 ^ww.w^trOjsTRici^ :ae,y.x*v.\u0026gt;..x-,v.UA\u0026amp;b\u0026gt;xSt ^xyy.xx-\n\u0026lt;*** ?* FORTHePERWSeNOCOJUNeao 1994AJ^OT996 f *  -a '' x*'-i.-* 0^ S* __________________________________________________.:....,,_________ Expenses SALARIES_____________ BENEFITS_____________ PURCHASED SERVICES MATERIALS 4 SUPPLIES CAPITAL OUTLAY i OTHER OBJECTS DEBT SERVICE CONTINGENCY iAPPROVED 1993/94 06/30/94 S!?*\"!-\n 76,127,991 9,240,239 10,855.851 I 4,596,277 j 1,606,2^ 5.258,186 I 8.870,123 1,000,000 I GOtLEG^FEG*\n75,079,647 9,305,313 I 11,369,363 i 3,420,371 1,704,608 4,537,917 8,903,285 'W'WT' DRAFT 7 1994/95 06/30/95 % m\nI .,.49o:j8^ I EXPENSES-OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS MAGNET SCHOOLS ~T 7,074.106 \u0026gt;*/(+ \u0026lt; 13.980,088 6,687,447 13,301,449 98.62% 100.70% 104.73% 74.42% 106.1 f 2%^ 86.30% 100.37% T ---------------------1-------------------------J. 73,341,379\n74,328,796' 10,338,888 r 10,127,412\n101.36% t 13,170,903 ! 12,285,606 3,273,118 2,644,992 5,504,406 8,533,631 3,200,799 1,934,494 5,592.513 + 97.95% 93.28% 97 79^ 73.14%) 101.60%! 8,647,933 1 t 101.34% 94.53% 8,711,620 35.15% 14.236.418 6,552,303 13,542,343 97.63% 95.12% 95:?^ INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE i (4,234,335) I (1,225,306) (3,794,221) IBEGINNING FUND BALANCE I I {1,145,788)1 I L I FEDERAL OPERATING I t 964,951 4,109,970\nr 1,034,369 4,985,188 609,068 4,184,363 609,888 4,184,363 I ENDING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL OPERATING I i 79,044 i * 761,542 I SSi -w *45^:1 609,888 4,184,363 isjssiisss 5,370 993,840 t 'ms y 5S*' 464,087 3,184,376 ILRSD SUPTS OFFICE 718 P05 AUG 10 95 15:56 PROJECT BEG BALANCE 07-01-94 MUOFt BOND ISSUS PLANT SERVICES SUBTOTAL 32,467.82 32,467.82 F7,64Ct,(700 BOND ISSUC CONTINGENCY SUBTOTAL 3,631.66 3,631.66 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ACCOUNT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30,1995 INCOME 1994-95 TRANSFERS 1994-96 EXPENDITURES 1994-95 ENCUMBRANCES 1994-95 ENO BALANCE 06-30-96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32,467.82 32,467.82 0 00 0.00 0.00 3,631.66 3,631.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 I I iS, 1S4.100 BQNO issue. KING FACILITIES STUBY CHICOT CONTINGENCY soarowz fl6,900.000 BOND ISSUE CENTRAL METROPOLITAN BOOKER DUNBAR FAIR PULASKI HGTS SOUTHWEST ALT LEARNING CENTE BRADY BADGETT BASELINE FAIR PARK WESTERN HILLS DODD PULASKI HGTS El EM OTTER CREEK WAKEFIELD WATSON EAST SIDE FRANKLIN STEPHENS MITCHELL CLOVERDALE ELEM WILSON CONTINGENCY , SUBTOTAL tis. 100,000 BOND issue BALE BASELINE BRADY CHICOT DODO FOREST HEIGHTS FOREST PARK 0188$ 469,839.22 37,154.41 506,993.63 729,98 10,541.35 203.26 10,279.42 12,610.03 4,370.30 381,618.93 19,680.93 6,160 02 3,569.07 11.684 73 28,352.62 9.876 16 2.514.28 19,040.60 3,625.09 47,812.10 17X22.54 68.082.96 472.32 3,370,631.05 1,998.17 0.00 0.00 294,135.83 4,325,311,73 24,976.69 11,086.46 10.306.60 235,777.43 48.184.93 25,872.19 27,640.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 (460,373.60) 242,000.00 150,000.00 68,373.60 0.00 24.894,99 (10,541.35) 9,101.79 (4.286.49) (12,194.57) (4,370.30) 453.08 1393.99! 1,131.61 (8,179.73) (13,648.52) (9.876.16) (2,514.28) 41.870.63 (3,625.09) (46,625.07) (7,152.01) 43.286 28 38,941.26 11,497.50 2,287.03 (51.136.61) 0.00 3.914.54 (8.536.80) 15.864.29) 66,146.49 134,127.81 (5.320,78) 730.14 53.684.00 61,080.00 114,764.00 10,368.03 9.305.04 5.992.93 108,763.17 20,034,01 6,766.03 4,700.68 3,505.00 14,704.10 21.695.25 2,287.03 7,983.50 20,644.10 348,321.32 40.939.43 11,497.50 2,287.03 638,694.15 8,070.67 3,427.86 1,770.00 206,984 91 83,331,42 (16,000.00) 22.319.84 730.14 0.00 0.00 9 466.72 188.316.00 150,000.00 44.447.91 392,229.63 15,256 84 0,00 0.00 0.00 415.46 0.00 272,855.76 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 39,216.88 0.00 0.00 2,287.03 68.082.96 23.084.50 3.022,409.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 242,999.32 3.686,617.58 16,906.02 11,572.14 0.00 22,928.23 20,000.00 175,000.00 0.00 0.00 (fl ... li 1 i. J JLRSD SUPTS OFFICE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ACCOUNT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30,1995 1 718 P06 AUG 10 95 15:58 J J J PROJECT GILLUM HALL HENDERSON IRC JEFFERSON KING MABELVALE JR MANN MEAOOWCLIFF MCCLaLAN PARKVIEW PURCHASING RIGHTSELL ROCKEFELLER ROMINE TERRY WATSON ADMINSTRATION PLANT SERVICE WILLIAMS CONTINGENCY susrorxu BEG BALANCE 07-01 94 46,623.40 72,167.34 0.00 10.500.00 665,076.52 677,649.27 779,529.23 10,218.50 128,163.14 0.00 99.566.59 1,678.10 0.00 0.00 18,925.35 92.76 26,050.53 0.00 0.00 353,182.02 897,457.69 4,170,624.36 INCOME 1994-95 o.oo TRANSFERS 1994 95 (66,973.17) 52,915.83 (529.041,77) 32,000.00 110,022.40 (107,795.15) 8,167.46 114,016.06 5.788.16 102,980.51 155,009.18 (14,180.88) (92.76) 40,206.61 12,450.52 36,228.44 1126.888.631 0.00 EXPENDITURES 1994.S6 6,194.17 48,666.83 277,502.71 147,999.30 389,774.96 34,733 76 20,367.99 8,157.45 213.582.66 7,366.25 101,812.28 6.044.18 4,744.47 1,340.22 12,450.52 389,410.46 1,91,77a.O3 ENCUMBRANCES 1994-95 END BALANCE 06-30-96 46,623.40 0.00 4,260.00 10,500.00 387,573.81 608.20 421,764.28 85.507.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,168.23 148.966.00 0.00 0,00 26,050.53 33,866.29 0.00 0.00  i I -1 0.00 770,669.06 2,188,852.33 KEVEWS SALE OF PROP/MI8C PROCEEOS-FIRE LOSS HENDERSON HENDERSON WATER METRO GRANT INTEREST SUBTOTAL GffAND TOTAL 441,340.44 101,741.55 35,864.20 4,100.00 36.998.72 1,268.948.69 1,888.983.60 10.928.012.80 6.680.10 200.60 35,000.00 408,431.25 4)6,011.36 416,011.35 0.00 0.00 35,200.60 2.806.530.26 0.00 447,719.94 101.741.66 854.20 4,100.00 36,998.72 1,677,379.94 2,268,794.35 8.536,49,?, as 1 3 bOffice of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 376-6200 Fax (501) 371 -0100 October 27, 1995 Mr. Michael Daugherty 2101 South Margin Little Rock, AR 72204 Dear Michael: Congratulations on your election to the Little Rock School District Board of Directors. From what Ive read, your professional and personal experiences give you insights that will be invaluable as the district makes decisions that affect the lives of so many. Im looking forward to getting to know you, and hope well find a time to begin that process soon. Please give me a call at your earliest convenience and lets arrange to get together. 1 hope you will also feel free to drop by ODM at any time to meet my colleagues and tour our offices. Under separate cover to your LRSD mail box. Im sending you some of our recent monitoring reports. 1 know that as a new board member youll be inundated Avith all sorts of paper, and 1 dont want to add too much to the pile. As is our practice, well routinely send you and other members of the board our new reports as we issue them. Please feel free to call on me or any member of my staff whenever we can answer a question or furnish information. We keep an open door and a pot of coffee on at all times, and well always be pleased to see you. Best wishes on your new venture. I know youre going to do a fine job. Sincerely yours, Ann S. Brown Enc. Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 October 29, 1995 Ms. Stephanie Johnson 8701 Interstate 30 Apt. 206 Little Rock, AR 72209 Dear Stephanie: I should have written this letter to you right after the election. Please forgive me for being slow to tell you how much 1 will miss you as a member of the Little Rock School District Board of Education. Although your tenure on the board was brief, it was nonetheless very significant. You displayed a quick grasp of the issues and a sincere, steadfast concern for the welfare of the children, parents, and employees of the district. You stepped in during a difficult time in the districts history, but you did not flinch when making touch decisions nor did you waver when taking a stand for your convictions. As both the desegregation monitor and a fellow citizen, 1 greatly appreciate the service you gave to our community as a board member. Although this phase of your public service is over for now. I know youll continue to serve in other roles because your heart is full of love and you will always care for others. Thank you for all youve done to make our town a better place for all of us. Your have my sincere best wishes for every success. Please dont ever hesitate to call on me whenever 1 can be of any help. Sincerely yours, Ann S. Brown Enc. i -LRSD ADMIN. BULDING 17:45 P. 02/02 (o Fax:1-501-324-2032 Jan 3 '96 \"a  LrrfLE Rock School District Media Advisory Januaiy' 3, 1996 For more information: Suellen Vann, 324-2020 1 i Special Board Meeting t\nI The Little Rock School District (LRSD) Board of Directors has called a special Board meeting for '1 hursday, January 4,1996. The agenda for the meeting will include: I I Dress Code at the Alternative Learning Center Review of LRSD contract with Laidlaw Transit Personnel Item J. !t I The meeting will begin at 6:30 p.m, in rhe Board Room of the LRSD Administration Building at 810 West Markham. 3 i t,' 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock. Arkansas 73301  (.501)334-8000 -1*.%  gs3a!iamgai\u0026lt;!gajgaB!gMimj^ ss I F!LgD U S OISTaiCT COURT eastern DISTRICTARKANSAS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION JUL 1 2 1996 JAM^yv. McCormack. CLERK OEP CLERI^- LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF vs. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS SERVICEMASTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES, A Limited Partnership INTERVENORS 30, ORDER The Court has previously scheduled hearings for July 29 and 1996 to consider Little Rock School District (LRSD) budget matters for FY 1996-97. Also on those dates, the Court intended to review the 1996-97 budgets for the North Little Rock School District (NLRSD) and the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD). Due to scheduling conflicts on the Court's docket (primarily as a result of an ongoing criminal trial), the Court will be unable to hold budget hearings on the dates scheduled. Those hearings are therefore canceled. In lieu of budget hearings. the Court orders the LRSD, NLRSD, and PCSSD to submit to the Office of Desegregation monitoring (ODM), on date and time to be a determined by them, any information ODM deems necessary for an adequate review of each district's budget. The Court expects the LRSD, NLRSD, and PCSSD to cooperate in good faith with ODMI regarding submission of any requested information so that further orders of the Court are unnecessary. Also before the Court is the Joshua Intervenors' motion for an interim award of attorney's fees and costs [doc.#2565]. * The Court hereby schedules a hearing on this motion to begin at 9:30 a. m. on July 29, 1996, in room #305, 600 West Capitol Avenue, U.S. Courthouse, in Little Rock, Arkansas. IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of July 1996. un1tT) states^ di: .TES DlSTJ^ICT JUDGE rws document e.ntfc'- rule 56 '^ND/qh 7^) L I SHEET irj  Al hearing on this motion had previously been scheduled for July 1, 1996, but had to be cancelled due to an ongoing criminal trial. -2- /08 '30 96 12:05 301 324 2023 LRSD COM5IUXICATI --- 0D)I @002 002 1 xons Little Rock School District School Board Candidate Forum August 30,1996 For more information: Suellen Vanm 324-2020 Candidates for the upcoming Little Rock School Board elections wiU answer questions during a televised public forum on Tuesday, September 3, 1996, The forum will provide voters the opportunity to learn more about the Little Rock School Board candidates and their thoughts on educational issues. In Zone 1 the incumbent, Dr. Katherine Mitchell, has filed for re-election. Dr. Mitchell IS challenged by Sarah Facen and Kenyon Lowe, Sr. In Zone 5 only one individual, Larry Berkley, filed for election\nthe incumbent, Linda Pondexter, is not seeking re-election. School board elections are set for September 17. The school board candidate forum is sponsored by the Coalition of Little Rock Neighborhoods and the Little Rock School District. Norns Deajon, KATV reporter, wiU serve as moderator. The forum wiU be broadcast live from the Little Rock School District Administration Building, 810 West Markham, over Comcast Cable Channel 4 at 6\n00 p.m., and wiU be rebroadcast each weekday at 8:30 a.m. and 1\n30 pm, through September 17, 810 West Markham StreetbaA PAGE 01/01 i i. , S\\  p. isms t  '  \u0026lt;J .1. ILittle Rock School District OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT received August 4,1998 AUfi ? - '933 Ann Brown, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ms. Brown: I want to update you on a change in the development of the agenda for Little Rock School District board meetings. The Board voted in July to open the Special Presentations section of the agenda to give more groups who are stakeholders in the District the opportunity to address the Board. We want to hear from representatives of all interested groups. Beginning with the August meeting, we ask that.you notify the Superintendents office if your organization wishes to have a representative address the Board at the regular monthly meeting. Contact Beverly Griffin at 324-2012 by noon on Monday preceding the board meeting and you will be placed on the agenda. Thank you for helping create the very best schools for our students. We look fcr.vard to conti Jing to hear from you at Board meetings. Yours truly, Judy Magness, President Board of Directors 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 824-2000 ** 1998-99 BOARD MEETING DATES MONTH August September October November December January February March April May June ** ** MEETING DATE * (Notification Date) 08-27-98 *(08-24-98) 09-24-98 *(09-21-98) 10-22-98 *(10-19-98) 11-19-98 *(11-16-98) 12-17-98 *(12-14-98) 01-28-99 *(01-25-99) 02-25-99 *(02-22-99) 03-25-99 *(03-22-99) 04-22-99 *(04-19-99) *(05-24-99) 06-24-99 *(06-21-99) November and December Meetings are scheduled one week earlier than usual to avoid conflict with holidays.Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 August 21, 1998 Mr. Mike Kumpuris 7606 Westwood Avenue Little Rock, AR 72204 Dear Mike: Congratulations on your recent appointment to the Board of Directors in the Little Rock School District. Your experiences as an administrator, budget manager, and volunteer give you insights that will be invaluable as the district makes decisions that affect the lives of so many. I'm looking forward to getting to know you, and hope we'll soon be able to spend some time doing just that. Please give me a call at your earliest convenience so we can arrange a time to get together. Id be happy for you to drop by to meet my colleagues and tour our offices. Im enclosing the mission statement of our office so you can get a sense of our values and philosophy. Our intention is always to work positively and cooperatively with the school districts. Were very excited about the possibilities now taking shape in the LRSD and are anxious to support the districts implementation of its new desegregation and education plan. Please feel free to call on me or any member of my staff whenever we can answer a question or furnish information. We keep the door open and the coffee hot at all times, and we'll always be pleased to see you. Best wishes on your new venture. Sincerely yours, Brown Enc.Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 October 12, 1998 Baker Kurrus 10816 Crestdale Lane Little Rock, AR 72212 Dear Baker: Congratulations on your recent election to the Board of Directors in the Little Rock School District. And to think we almost lost you to north Arkansas! Glad you decided to stay here in Little Rock where your experiences and insights will be invaluable as the district makes important decisions that affect the lives of so many. .Although youre no stranger to ODM and I think of you as a friend, its my custom to invite new board members to visit the office to get their bearings on our location and meet the staff. Id love to spend some time catching up with you. Please give me a call at your earliest convenience so we can arrange to get together. Ill be out of state for a while this month, but Polly will be happy to set up a time for us to meet after I return. Youve probably seen it before, but in case not. Im enclosing the ODM mission statement, which encompasses our values and philosophy. As you know, our intention is always to work positively and cooperatively with the school districts. Were very excited about the possibilities now taking shape in the LRSD and are working to support the districts implementation of its new desegregation and education plan. Please feel free to call on me or any member of my staff whenever we can answer a question or furnish information. We keep the door open and the coffee hot at all times, and we'll always be pleased to see you. Best wishes on your new venture. Sincerely yours, Auin S. Brown Enc. Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham. Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock. Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 October 16, 2000 Mr. Tony Rose 8109 Mellwood Little Rock, AR 72204 Dear Tony: Congratulations on your election to the Board of Directors in the Little Rock School District! Achieving public office is a significant accomplishment, and aspiring to service on the school board indicates that you care a great deal about children, which makes you a very important person indeed.. Its my custom to invite new board members to come visit us at ODM to get a bearing on our location, tour our offices, and meet the staff. Wed love to spend some time getting to know you and answering any questions you might have about our office and how we work. Please give me a call at your earliest convenience so we can arrange to get together. Im enclosing the ODM mission statement, which encompasses our values and philosophy. Our intention is always to work positively and cooperatively with the local school districts. We value our history of working closely with the LRSD and enjoy a congenial and productive relationship with the districts leaders. Please feel free to call on me or any member of my staff whenever we can answer a question or furnish information. We keep the door open and the coffee hot at all times, and well always be glad to see you. Best wishes on your new venture. Sincerely yours, Ann S. Brown Enc. ZONE I 2 3 4 5 6 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS NAME Katherine Mitchell Michael Daugherty Judy Magness re/-ary H. Baker Kuitus Vce. Lairy Berkley Tony Rose 7 Sue Strickland ADDRESS 1605 Welch St. Little Rock, AR 72206 2101 S. Martin Little Rock, AR 72204 e-mail: mdaugh@virlualhosts.net 708 Hall Drive Little Rock, AR 72205 e-mail: jmagncs@ibm.net 10816 Crestdale Lane Little Rock, AR 72212 e-mail: bkunus@aol.com 14005 St. Charles Blvd. Little Rock, AR 72211 e-mail\nlany@carti.conQ 8I09Mellwood Little Rock, AR 72204 e-mail: lonyrose@cei.net 19 Peartiee Place Little Rock, AR 72209 e-mail: terrell@anstotle.nel TELEPHONE 375-6957 (li) 370-5255 (o) 664-3143 (h) 370-3580 (vm) 666-0923 (h) 224-4154 (h) 376-3300 (w) 225-7377 (h) 296-3254(w) 568-7587 (h) 569-3122 (w) 455-1843(h) TERM 2002 q CS) s? hO (S CS o (S co 2001 Cd K) A KO KO 2003 2001 2002 2003 2003 Q-aq-co a o I C5 N110/18/2000 08:48 3242032 LRSD PAGE 02/02 2000-2001 BOARD MEETING DATES MONTH AGENDA MF-KTING * (Items Due) REGULAR MEETING * * (Items Due) July 07-13-\u0026lt;X) (07-11-00) (n-n-OKi **(07-24-00) 08-10-00 * (00-00-00) 08-24-00 **\u0026lt;0-22-00\u0026gt; SqAember 09-14-00 (09-12-00) October 10-12-00 09-23-00 **(09-25M)0) 10.36300 **\u0026lt;20-25-00\nNovember 11-02-00 (10-31-00) 1146-00 **fJJ-J3-Wj December 12-07-00 *fJ2-O5-fl0 12-14-00 (12^11^0) laawxy 01-11-01 *f02-09-02\u0026gt; 01-25-01 **\u0026lt;02-22-02\nFebruary 02-08-01 *(02-06-01) 02-22-01 March 03-08-01 *\u0026lt;05-06-00 JJ 03-22-01 **(03-19-01) Afoil 0442:5.1 *(04-10-01) 04-26-01 May 05-10-01 *\u0026lt;05-0-02\u0026gt; 05-24-01 **rO5^2J-OZ\u0026gt; June 06-14-01 06-28-01 **(0^25-01) * Proposed agenda items due in the Superintendent's office by noon on Tuesday prior to meeting. (For publication and distribution to the Doard two diQis prior to the meeting.) fuudi^enda items due in tite Superintendents office BY NOON onMonday, (For publication in tiie monthly board agenda.)CM S) \\ CM O LU CL little rock school oistrict superintendent of schools Roy S. Brooks, Ed.D. BIO West Markhom Street Little Rock, AR 72201 (SOI) 447-1005 board of DDtECTORS ZONE 1 LU o Ll U. o (n q: LU cn a co a 2 3 4 cn in 5 __________NAME Kotherine Mitchell MichfleJ bflugheTty Bryon bay H. Baker Krrus t-arry Berkley I Y rH (S in 6 Tony ftase cn CM in 7 - Sue Strrcklond (S ID CM cn ADDRESS 1605 Welch St. Little Rock, AR 72206 e-mail: KPMITCHELL@PHILANDER.EDU 2101 S. Mortin Little Rack, AR 72204 e moil: rmdaughertyearistotle.net 337 Crystol Court Little Rock, AR 72205 e-moil: Bday@little\u0026lt;ock.state.arus 10816 Crestdale Lane Little Rock, AR 72212 _e-^il\nbkurrus@aol com 14005 St. Charles Blvd. ' Little Rock, AR 72211 e-tnail: iarry@corti.com 8109 Melfwood Little Rock, AR 72204 e-mail: tonyrosel@comca$t.net 13600 Otter Creek Parkway 4pt, 147, LR.AR 72219 e-mail: tstrickland33@conicosf.net tclephone 375-6957 (h) 370-5255(0) 664-3143 (h) 664-5776 (fi) 371-4770 (w) 224-4154 (h) 376-3300 (w) (h) 296-3254(i) 568-7587 (h) 569-8122 (w) 455-1843 term 2005 2004  2006 2004 2005 2006 2006ZONE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS NAME Katherine Mitchell Michael Daugherty Bryan Day H. Baker Kurrus Larry Berkley Tony Rose Sue Strickland ADDRESS 1605 Welch St. Little Rock, AR 72206 e-mail: KPMITCHELL@PHlLANDER.Fni) 2101 S. Martin Little Rock, AR 72204 e-mail: rmdaugherty@aristotle.net 337 Crystal Court Little Rock, AR 72205 e-mail\nBdav@littlei'ock.sta(e.ar.us 10816 Crestdale Lane Little Rock, AR 72212 e-mail\nbkurrus@aol.com T4OO5 St. Charles Blvd. Little Rock, AR 72211 e-mail: laiTv@carti.com 8109 Mellwood Little Rock, AR 72204 e-mail: tonvrosef^ei.net 19 Peartree Place Little Rock, AR 72209 suestrickl and200Q@yah oo.com TELEPHONE 315-695'1 (h) 370-5255 (o) 664-3143(h) 664-5776 (h) 371-4770 (w) 224-4154 (h) 376-3300 (w) 225-7377 (h) 296-3254(w) 568-7587 (h) 569-8122 (w) 455-1843 (h) TERM 2005 2004 2006 2004 2005 2006 2006,LRSD Board of Directors Page 1 of2 Little School [ Mom I Info [ parents | Schools | gjoard of E.d ) Adiitn VipS 5tu\u0026lt;lnt3 JoiS C.on*ac* (J Si* LK5D OKG Board Members Board Members Board Meeting Dates Board Meeting Minutes Board Policies Board Elections Policy Search ''1 .\"i i I I Katherine Mitchell Zone 1 R. Micheal Daughei Zone 2 President 7 Bryan C Zone : Secreta IfiBUf\nJ H. Baker Kurrus Zone 4 Vice President Larry Berkley Zone 5 Tony Rt Zone I http ://www. lrsd.org/Gen_Info/boardindex. cfrn?id=3 7 11/10/2005 .LRSD Board of Directors Page 2 of 2 aggwi ''v J -C-Msi*' Sue Strickland Zone 7 Home I Info | Schools | Board of Ed | Admin | News | Students Employees | Jobs | Contact Us | Site Guide Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Little Rock AR 72201 Ph. 501.4 http://www.lrsd.org/Gen Info/boardindex.cfm?id=37 11/10/2005 Arkansas Democrat-Gazette FRIDAY, MARCH 6, 1992 Armstrong, 86 newcomer to LR School Board, resigns CYNTI-114 uniA/ci I r ....______________________ BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazette Staff Writer Robin Armstrong, a Little Rock School Board member since 1986. resigned the position Thursday, citing job duties that would keep her from devoting enough time to the selection of a new superintendent and making other district- related decisions. I  w % a frequent Armstrong ally a knowledgeable board member who brought realism and common Armstrong, 39,' said her job LuJS as community affairs coordina- o t Central Arkansas Radiation Therapy Institute s sense to an out-of-touch educational bureaucracy. Armstrong was president of the board in 1989 when Steele was hired and when the settlement to the desegregation lawsuit was negotiated among the three Pulaski County school districts. has expanded. She UM expanaea. bhe promotes he three CARTI centers in Little Rock, Mountain Home and Searcy, and IS a major organizer of the annual Festival of Trees fundraiser. -a I Armstrongs three-year term as the school board member ------= .he board Applicants should live hi the zone. The board will interview applicants March 19. Zone 4 encompasses an north of Rodney Parham --------  Hinson roads and r -   successor, who Arkansas River. The west re- boundary is the city limits Zih\"/ members, while the east boundary   would serve until the Sept. 15 aong North UniverLt? school election and be eligible AA._-...^.\"'''.Csity a three-vear term. the school board must make some critical decisions in the next few months including the selection of a superintendent to succeed Ruth Steele, who is retiring June 30. will be appointed by the remembers 1 Robin Armstrong an area and south of the runs nueandMissis.-ippfs^re^t.^''\" Rutherford, a former met school board member who was In her letter of resignation to board President O.G. Jaco- velli, Armstrong said the last six years had been a unique experience. She called her term a period of extreme highs and the lowest of lows. The lows included the loss school families in 1987 because of the controlled- choice student assignment plan, Armstrong said. Other lows included the financial problems that almost closed the district in 1990, The highs included the at- tainment of a court-approved settlement  at- . - in the desegregation lawsuit, she said. ~ uun Other highs included increasing en- T*- cooperation among cnh  ftilaski County school districts, the reinstatement of junior high athletic programs, passage of an 8-mill tax increase in 1990 and the employment of elementary school counselors. I iI 1 ) t -4 Arkansas Democrat-Gazette FRIDAY, MARCH 20, 1992 Pulaski Ex-LR schools chief gets Zone 4 position  BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democral-Gazette Staff Writer\nFormer Little Rock Superintendent George D. Cannon was selected Thursday by iLittle Rock .School Board\nto fill the va- ' cancy created by the resig- .nation of Robin Arm. strong March 5, on / Cannon, mow a faculty\nmember I  Related article 3B the a t George Cannon Ihe University of Arkansas at\nLittle Rock, was one of seven ?applicants interviewed by the '.board for the Zone 4 position. The board interviewed each -applicant and then met in a closed session for about an hour before voting 4-0 in favor iisr Cannon. Board members present Thursday were O.G. jacovelli, W.D. Bill Hamilton. Pat Gee and Dorsey Jackson. iDr. Katherine Mitchell and 'John Moore were absent.\n Cannon. 50, will serve until the Sept, 15 school election, at which time he will be eligible '.to run for election to the\nboard. He said he will focus on the duties the board now faces and did not say whether he would seek election in Sep-\ntember. Cannon, who lives at 34 Inverness Circle, was superin- ffendent of the school district from October 1987 until he resigned in August 1989. He formerly was superintendent of schools in Meridian, Miss. He teaches school finance, school law, and board and superintendent relations at UALR, In his interview. Cannon said he has an understanding of many of the issues that make the Little Rock district more difficult to manage than 75 percent to 80 percent of other districts in the country. He said his top priority would be to clearly establish goals for the district so that all employees can articulate and work toward them. In response to questions from the board. Cannon said that he supported the health clinic at Central High School and that one of the most serious issues facing the district is the possible financial collapse of the Pulaski County Special School District, He said other concerns were the disparities in academic achievement of black and white students, and the districts financial stability. Cannon and his wife, Peggy, a sixth-grade teacher at Otter Creek Elementary, have three sons, the youngest of whom attends Carver Elementary School. The older sons have graduated. t j f 1Arkansas Democrat-Gazette FRIDAY, MARCH 20, 1992 LRSD board member proposes contracting for support services BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazette Staff Writer Little Rock School Board member Dorsey Jackson asked the board Thursday to authorize a feasibility st 'n hiring private companies 'a provide the district with janitorial, transportation or other support services. Jackson said his discussions with district administrators and a private firm indicated the district could save as much as $1 million a year by contracting for the services rather than continuing to employ its own workers. Jackson said *hf districts mission is to provide a quality education. In :o doing, we should explore ,-a-\n.ous alternatives to providing such education in the most effective, cost-efficient manner as possible. Not only do I believe the cost savings would be substantial, Jackson said, but I think the amount of time devoted to these services by Dr. (Ruth) Steele and her administration could be much better spent on curriculum management and improving the educational performance of the students. He said the study would not commit the district to contracting services. But should 'he savings be substantial, he said, it would be difficult to justify not proceeding with implementation. The board took no action Thursday, but could do so at a meeting March 26. The proposal generated immediate reactions from board member W.D. Bill Hamilton and Frank Martin, executive director of the Classroom Teachers Association. Hamilton said private firms do not always treat their employees well and frequently when the employees and dishire part-time workers, who are ineligible for insurance benefits that district employees receive. 7 think the amount of time devoted to these services by Dr. (Ruth) Steele and her administration could be much better spent on curriculum management and improving the educational performance of the students.  Many of our support service employees are parents of children in our district, he said. By contracting services, we may be hurting our children as well as our employees. Martin said the CTA, which represents almost 1,000 of the support employees, will oppose any plans for contracting services. The district explored contracting for custodial services in 1986. but turned it down trict officials agreed to find other ways to cut costs. In other district business, James Ivey, the districts manager for support services since last summer, has submitted his resignation from the school district, effective June 30. Steele said steps will be taken immediately to fill the position so the new employee will be able to work with Ivey before he leaves. Ivey is the third top district administrator to announce plans to retire or resign this year. Steele and Deputy Superintendent Tony Wood also are leaving at the end of June. James Jennings, associate superintendent for desegregation. said a year ago that he may take a position at Hendrix College at Conway next year, although he has not yet taken any formal action.Arkcinscis Democrat-Gozette SATURDAY, JUNE 13 , 1992 Cannon makes finals for job in Louisiana by CYNTHIA wnvuci . V. BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Oemocrai-Gazetto Siad Writer lu Dr. George Cannon h Cannon, a member of the Little Rock School Board and a former district superintendent, is one of six finalists for the job of superin- Monroe, La., City School District.  Brass, a member of the Monroe School Board and chairman of the superintendent search committee, said Friday that Cannon is one of the leading contenders for the job. The names of finalists were announced Thursday night. Brass said the school board plans to decide on a new superintendent on June 29. Cannon will be interviewed by the board Thursday. The advertised salary range for the position is $75,000 to $85,000 plus benefits that are negotiable. The district has about 11,000 students and an annual budget of $34 million . The current superintendent IS James L. Pughsley, who is resigning after serving two years of his four-year contract. Besides Cannon, finalists are Dr. H.P. Bell, an assistant superintendent in Dallas, Texas: Dr. Maxine Pijeau superintendent of the East Orange County, N.J., School District\nDr. Terry Terril, superintendent of the Caddo Parish La.. School District\nRichard Miles, an assistant superintendent in Monroe\nand Abe Pierce, an assistant superintendent in Ouachita Parish, La., School District. Cannon was superintendent of the Little Rock district from 1987 until August 1989. He IS a faculty member in the College of Education at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock. has unex- Since March, Cannon L been a Little Rock School Board member. He was appointed to fulfill the unex- Pired term of Robin Armstrong. who resigned. The term will end Sept. 15, at t'n'e Cannon would be elootion to the board from Zone 4. Arkansas Democrat Established 1871 Arkansas (gazette Established 1819 Arkansas Democrat gazette An Independent Daily and Sunday Newspaper   MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 1992 Teacher contract on boards agenda The Little Rock School Board will hold a special meeting at 5 p.m. today to vote on the 1992- 93 teacher contract. In other business, the board will decide what process to use to fill the board vacancy created by the recent resignation oi ur. George Cannon. Cannon represented Zone 4, which encompasses northwest Little Rock. Also on the agenda will be a discussion on the feasibility of changing some of the districts Friday night high school football games to Saturday mornings.Arkansas Democrat THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 1992 -- I School board hears proposal to rewrite policy on complaints BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazette Education Writer Anonymous complainers to the Little Rock School District may find their future complaints unheeded if the school board next week approves a policy change on the matter. Superintendent Mac Bernd recommended during a board committee meeting Wednesday that the existing complaint policy be altered to say anonymous complaints will not be checked out. However, after board members objected to a blanket rejection of all anonymous calls and letters, the superintendent said he would rephrase the proposal to say that if facts in the anonymous complaint are verifiable, the complaint will not be ignored. We think it is important to have a statement in policy about handling anonymous complaints, Bernd said in introducing the proposal. We suggest they be disregarded. He said people should identify themselves so problems can be fully investigated. During an investigation, the person making the complaint may need to provide additional information. Bernd said no particular incident prompted the proposed policy change. Sometimes people have legitimate reasons for not identifying themselves, said board member Katherine Mitchell. Employees may be afraid to say something about a problem. Mitchell said writing a policy on anonymous complaints was a waste of time, and people should use common sense to determine whether a complaint is worth considering. The proposed policy also says the district welcomes constructive criticism when it is motivated by a sincere desire to improve the quality of the educational process. The policy proposal also states that employees will treat patrons courteously at all times. However, teachers or other school personnel need not endure insults or abusive treatment from any person pertaining to any complaint, the proposal says. Also on Wednesday, Brady Gadberry, the districts director of human relations, said that approximately 160 certified employees resigned or retired from I k I I 9 h n A 4 If M M w II \u0026lt; ill f r I I I 1 rArkansas Democrat \"^(^azcUc   MONDAY. FEBRUARY 1, 1993 Copyright o 1993, Little Rock Newspapers, Inc. Education briefs LR board names lawyer president John Moore, an attorney with the Huckaby, Munson, Rowlett and Tilley law firm, was elected president of the Little Rock School Board on Thursday night. He replaced O.G. Jacovelli, who remains on the board but is no longer an officer. Dorsey Jackson was elected vice president and Dr. Katherine Mitchell was elected secretary of the seven-member board.Arkansas Democrat .w\u0026gt; (gazette FRIDAY. FEBRUARY 26, 1993 CoDyngnt 5? 1993. Little Rock Newspapers. !nc. School boards must meet after 5 p.m. under bill passed 29-1 by Senate BY RACHEL ONEAL Democrat-Gazette Capitol Bureau An amendment that would allow school boards to meet in special session before 5 p.m. was soundly defeated Thursday by the state Senate. After the amendment failed, the Senate approved Senate Bill 418, which would require all school board meetings to be held after 5 p.m. The lead sponsor of the bill is Sen. James Scott of Warren. The unsuccessful amendment was proposed by Sen. David Malone of Fayetteville. If you call a special meeting and you have it at 2 p.m., then the people who want to come and voice their opinions will be at work, Sen. Mike Everett of Marked Tree, who voted against the amendment, said. But Malone said school districts dont want the Legislature to dictate all their rules and regulations. The bill was approved by a vote of 29-1. Sen. Joe Yates of Bentonville was the only senator who voted against the legislation. Also Thursday, the Senate approved two versions of bills to prohibit stalking. Before approving the bills, the Senate amended Senate Bill 2 to make it identical to House Bill 1201. SB 2 is sponsored by Sen. Eugene Bud Canada of Hot Springs. HB 1201 is sponsored by Rep. Judy Smith of Camden. Both bills would classify a stalker as a person who purposefully engages in a course of conduct that harasses another person and makes a terroristic threat with the intent of placing that person in imminent fear of death or serious bodily injury. Under both bills, the acts of stalking must be separated by at least 36 hours and occur within one year. Second-degree stalking would carry a three- to 10-year prison term and a $10,000 fine. Under first-degree stalking, the convicted person must have been convicted of second-degree stalking within 10 years of the crime or must have been armed with a deadly weapon. SB 2 was approved unanimously. SB 1201 was approved 34-1.Arkansas Democrat SATURDAY, MARCH 13, 1993 ' Copyright C 1993, Little Rock Newspapers. Inc. Legislative digest Sponsor delays bill on school boards The House sponsor of a bill that would require school boards to meet after 5 p.m. delayed consideration of the proposal by the House on Friday after several members objected. . The debate over Senate Bill 418 by Sen. James Scott of Warren was about the only discussion on a day when legislators were anxious to head home before expected bad weather hit  and catch the Razorback basketball game on TV. What it (SB 418) is doing is requiring them to meet when the public can meet with them, said Rep. Jimmie Don McKis- sack of Star City, who was handling the bill in the House. Rep. Pat Flanagin of Forrest City called it an honest and good government bill. But McKissack asked for the delay after Reps. Jimmie Wilson . of Lakeview and Roger Rorie of Clinton said the bill would take away local power from school boards.Arkansas Democrat (Bazcttc Arkansas Democrat Qpazette FRIDAY, MARCH 26,1993 Copyright  1993. Little Rock Newspapers. Inc. LRSD board commits to court plan I I I I BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazette Education Writer In response to U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wrights stern lecture last week to the Little Rock School Board, board members said Thursday that they believe the district must be committed to implementing the court-approved desegregation plan. Board members Dorsey Jackson and John A. Riggs IV both read lengthy statements, saying they didnt agree with all parts of the plan adopted by their predecessors, but court orders must be obeyed. In spite of my philosophical differences with this plan, I intend to use my influence as a board member to see it is implemented, Jackson read. Jackson, whom the judge called on to stop reading a magazine during the court hearing, apologized for his courtroom behavior and said he had no intention to resign despite pressure to do so. He went on to say that demands made on the district by the black Joshua intervenors were unreasonable. He asked that John Walker, the intervenors attorney, restrain his hostilities and enable the district to educate all children. Walker, who attended the meeting, questioned Jacksons sincerity and said he was begging the board to drop its adversary role and be cooperative in the school case. Riggs said in his six-page statement that he would attend all future court hearings and report to the board on them if Wright would release other members from attending. District Superintendent Mac Bernd told the board that steps are planned to immediately assess what components of the desegregation plan are being implemented and what remains to be done. In other business, the board approved\n A committee recommendation that a new interdistrict elementary school be built on the site of the Stephens Incentive Elementary School at 3700 W. 18th St.  The assignment of Sadie principal Mitchell, of Cloverdale Elementary School, as principal of the new Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Elementary School.Aikansas Democrat gazette FRIDAY, JUNE 11,1993 - 9B LRSD ponders appeal of hearing attendance order BY DANNY SHAMEER Democrat-Gazene Education Writer The Little Rock School Board will vote June 24 on whether to appeal a federal judges requirement that its members appear at court hearings in the Pulaski County school desegregation case. The idea sparked strong opinions from all sides of the table when board member Dorsey Jackson brought it up during a work session Thursday to develop an agenda for the regular monthly board meeting June 24. He also proposed two other items designed to help ensure that the board will know whether the district and its employees are following court guidelines and the desegregation plan. Those proposals would:  Instruct the districts administration and legal staff to prepare a summarized list of timetables of specific desegregation plan items from all the various court orders in effect.  Direct the administration to prepare specific job descriptions for cabinet-level positions. The descriptions would identify specific sections of the desegregation plan for which the employee is responsible. The cabinet-level employee would be required to develop similar job descriptions for staff members. Since March, U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright has required school board members to attend federal court hearings involving the district and the desegregation case. If she grants excused absences to any members, they must attend a review session at a later date to go over key points. Jackson said that requiring board members to attend hearings during the work day prevents them from performing their regular jobs and may ultimately limit the number of people who can serve on the school board. Board president John Moore, who was fined $100 for contempt of court after leaving a desegregation hearing Tuesday afternoon without permission because of a job commitment, favored placing Jacksons proposal to appeal on the June 24 agenda. Board members Pat Gee, Dr. Katherine Mitchell and Bill Hamilton spoke against adding the appeal to the agenda. They said the judge wants the board to witness firsthand how she believes the district is mishandling desegregation guidelines.Arkansas Democrat (j^azctte FRIDAY, JULY 16, 1993 . Copyright O 1993, Little Rock Newspapers, Inc. i.' EDITORIALS Emergency coming For the schools John Riggs of the Little Rock School Board got credit for this suggestion: When the board interviews prospects for a new superintendent to replace short-timer Mac Bernd, we want to make sure the next superintendent knows every wart on this school district. We want to talk them out of the job before they take it Good idea. Lets hope the board finds a candidate with staying power this time. But considering the challenge, not even a combination of Horace Mann, John Dewey, Maria Montessori and Booker T. Washington could do the job alone  not without a change in public attitude and public policy. The district is going broke, it faces receivership, the money from the legal settlement is running out, and the only clear prospect ahead is more of the same. Ba li .I. \u0026gt; )| 'I r/ I i l .. ll I 'I 111: Even if you dont care much about the school system in Little Rock, though you should, remember that, as the schools go, so goes the capital city. When young folks with families drift away, they take with them not just their kids but their houses and business and civic activities and spirit. Its time for more than a new superintendent. Its time for leadership  for ail those who are bound by the legal settlement to renegotiate it with the object of reviving public education in Central Arkansas. What good is preserving every metropolitan school districts stake in the settlement if it drags all of them down and chases folks away from the city? In the past, Arkansas has been good at rallying in times of crisis. A small band of women saved Little Rocks schools back in the bad old days. Businessmen have come to the citys rescue more than once, often quietly and almost unnoticed. What about an emergency committee of teachers, parents, public officials and civic leaders to rethink and revive public education in Little Rock before the approaching  emergency strikes full force? The community has the resources, it has the leadership, and it has the pride to make a new start. It need only unite and mobilize them. Here is something j to think about, but not too long. Here is j something that needs doing. Soon. I 'f! Arkansas Democrat (gazette TUESDAY, AUGUST 3, 1993 Copyright O 1993. UWe Rock Newspapers. Inc. The responsibilities of a school board I read with interest the article about the citizens committee that is trying to get the Little Rock School District to reconsider hiring John Hickman. They also made a lot of recommendations for other principals and vice principals at various schools in the district. They need to study the duties and responsibilities of a school board in Arkansas. The school board is charged with hiring and firing the superintendent and setting school policy. The superintendent is then charged with the responsibility of recommending the hiring and firing of all other personnel in the district. The school board either approves or disapproves of his recommendations, and other action by the school board should be considered interference with the duties of the superintendent. Everyone who aspires to a professional position must submit an application for that opening based on the qualifications set down by the state of Arkansas.Arkansas Demcxn-at ^(gazette -FRIDAY, FEBRUARY4,1994  School Board to tackle variety of topics The Little Rock School Board will meet today and Saturday for a two-day work session on a variety of topics, including presentation of preliminary information on the districts 1994-95 budget. The work session will begin at 4:30 p.m. today on the fourth floor of Worthen Bank, 200 W. Capitol Ave. 'The session will resume at 8 a.m. Saturday at the same location. Tentative agenda items include a report on the advantages and disadvantages of hiring private companies to perform jobs now done by nonteaching district employees, incentive schools and the districts desegregation plan, facilities, transportation, student discipline, board policies, district goals and the appointment of board members to committees.FRIDAY, APRIL 1,1994 LRSD officials present board with wish list worth $193,480 BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazette Education Writer Despite the need to cut $7.2 million in expenses for next year. Little Rock School District administrators are recommending some more staff and programs for 1994-95. Some of the programs are required by the state and federal governments or the districts own desegregation plan. Programs proposed to the school board this week will cost about $193,480 from revenues that will total $136 million next year. The board hasnt approved the proposals or decided how expenses will be cut. The budget additions include:  $75,000 to expand district services to serve a minimum of 100 students with limited or no English skills.  $38,000 for revising math, language arts, foreign language and science courses to comply with state directives and for training teachers in those changes.  $25,000 for science equipment.  $18,000 for a secretary in the social studies department.  $3,000 for development of a Spanish immersion pilot program where virtually all instruction in a first-grade incentive school class would be in Spanish. The school that would hold the program hasnt been chosen.  $15,000 to revise the foreign language curriculum to accommodate students who have extensive instruction in elementary schools and those who dont. The University of Arkansas at Little Rock will assist with the project.  $18,000 for supplies and graduate course hours for math teachers in grades kindergarten through four. Two teachers in each of the 36 elementary schools will participate in the program. Another $377,000 would be spent on four Spanish teachers for the incentive elementary schools and equipment purchases to support the high-technology themes at Franklin, Rockefeller, Rightsell and Garland incentive schools. Those costs can be absorbed by doubling the funding those schools receive per student under the districts desegregation plan.Arkansas Democrat \"8? azcttc  K FRIDAY, MAY 27, 1 MJ LRSD board chief placed on probation for illegal duck hunt Ducks BY PATRICIA MANSON Democrat-Gazette Federal Reporter Little Rock School Board President Dorsey Jackson was placed on probation Thursday after pleading guilty to violating federal regulations during a January duck hunt. Jacksons conviction on six nnsdemeanor counts wont disqualify him from remaining on the school board, said the boards attorney. Christopher Heller. Five other defendants in the case also pleaded guilty Thursday to misdemeanors and were sentenced in federal court in Little Rock. Jacksons son and three other men admitted they shot more than their limit of ducks and Illegally tagged the birds to conceal the identity of the hunter who killed them. A sixth defendant admitted he had possessed illegally tagged ducks. J L I Federal officials said five of the defendants were responsible for shooting 23 ducks more than the limit dur- ing three days. The sixth defendant took the birds to a commercial picking operation officials said. Officers from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service investi- Dorsey Jackson gated the case. In federal court Thursday, U.S. Magistrate Judge Jerry W. Cavaneau said duck hunters who violate regulations are cheating all the rest of us. When people in positions of trust and authority ignore the law, disrespect the law, we cant expect other people to respect it, Cavaneau told the defendants. The magistrate followed See DUCKS, Page 5B  Continued from Page 1B Assistant U.S. Attorney Kenneth F. Stolls sentencing recommendations, ordering all the defendants to pay restitution and placing five of them on probation. The men had faced a six-month jail term and a $5,000 fine on each count. Stoll told the magistrate that the investigation in the case began Jan. 8. Thal was the day three of the defendants returned to the Circle S Duck Club in Arkansas County with their limit of ducks and then went out hunting again, Stoll said. He said five of the defendants repealed the same procedure the next day, bringing in a limit of ducks and then going out again for more game. After being confronted by wildlife officers, the Jacksons admitted they also had killed more than their limit of ducks and illegally tagged the birds Jan. 7, the day before the investigation began, Stoll said. Defense attorney Jim Rhodes didnt challenge Stolls account, .saying the Jacksons and the other defendants had acknowledged their guilt from Day One. But in a February 3 interview with the Arkansas Democrat- Gazette, Jackson denied having been questioned by authorities about the incident. Five of the defendants were placed on one year of unsupervised probation, barred from hunting during that time and ordered to pay restitution. Those defendants were: Jackson, 50. He pleaded guilty to three counts of killing more than the three-duck daily limit and three counts of improperly tagging the excess. Cavaneau ordered Jackson to pay $2,500 in restitution.  Dorsey Jackson Jr., 22, of Little Rock. The school board presidents son also pleaded guilty to six misdemeanor counts. He was ordered to pay $1,500 in restitution.  CharlesE. Kalb, 31, of Memphis. He pleaded guilty to four misdemeanor counts and was ordered to pay $2,100 in restitution.  E.F. Lord Jr., 50, of Little Rock. He pleaded guilty to three misdemeanor counts and was ordered to pay $1,500 in restitution.  Robert C. Lord, 49, E.F Lord's brother, of Little Rock. He pleaded guilty to two misdemeanor counts and was ordered to pay $1,200 in restitution. Wayne C. Sexton, 44, of Gillett, was the only defendant not placed on probation. He pleaded guilty to one misdemeanor count of having custody of 16 improperly tagged ducks and was ordered to pay $750 in restitution. Outside the courtroom. Special Agent Ron Parker of the federal wildlife service said tagging the hunters name and address the number and species of the birds and the date the birds were killed. The tag must be signed by the hunter, he said Parker said the tagging requirements are designed to make hunters accountable for the birds they kill and to prevent hunters from bagging more than the limit. violations and ''double trinnini\n\" --nr Irillinn \u0026lt;1____. or killing more than one limit  IS .q big problem among hunters. Federal regulations require hunters to lag the migratory game birds they have bagged if they leave the birds outside their homes or in someone elses possession, Parker said. He said the tag must includeSATURDAY. JUNE 4, 1994  Dorsey Jackson should resign Dorsey Jackson should resign from the Little Rock School Board. The board, patrons, community and children attending the Little Rock School District would be served positively by his departure. Jackson was ordered to pay $2,500 for exceeding his daily limitation of duck kills. Jackson allegedly admitted killing his daily limit, disposing of the ducks at a duck club, then returned to kill more ducks. Jackson broke the law six times. Jacksons son was also ordered to pay restitution for the same offense. Jackson, as president of the School Board, is in a position of trust and leadership in the community. He violated his position of trust and leadership. The example Jackson sets for his children is his business, but the example he sets for the community, and more importantly, the children attending the Little Rock School District, is all of our business and concern. How can the community expect Jack- son to credibly carry out the laws which govern our school district and the desegregation orders he is responsible for implementing when he has such disrespect for the law? If he does not resign, the board should pass a no-confidence resolution pertaining to his position as a board member. JOHN ROLLANS Little RockArkansas Democrat 'w (gazette  WEDNESDAY, JUNE 8, 1994 Ducks unlimited When hunters are caught ow embarrassing for Dorsey Jackson, president of Little Rocks school board  and for the rest of us. Shooting only one duck too many would be a dubious examp le to set for the next generation. Mr. Jackson and four others now have pled guilty to bagging twenty-three over the legal limit back in January. Its also reported that they illegally tagged the carcasses to conceal who had killed the ducks. In February, Mr. Jackson denied that he had been questioned by authorities about the hunting incident when a reporter asked about it. Now this. Others on the hunt were Mr. Jacksons son, Dorsey Jackson Jr.\nCharles E. Kalb of Memphis\nand the brothers Lord  E.F. Jr. and Robert C. Another man, Wayne Sexton of Gillett, was arrested for possessing the  ducks. The game warden seems to have bagged quite a few. At least Mr. Jackson wont lose his seat as president of the school board. A federal magistrate could have sent all of the defendants to jail for six months and fined them $5,000. In ad- - dition to making restitution in amounts ranging from $1,200 to $2,500  Mr. Jackson paid the most  all the defendants were placed on probation. Lucky for them the magistrate didnt turn them all over to Ducks Unlimited. Those folks are not fond of people who violate the game laws. The Jacksons and their friends werent the first duck hunters to get caught thinking with their trigger fingers. Temptation has a way of clouding common sense  and legal bag limits. When hunters find themselves in marshlands frequented by swarms of quackers, something strange seems to overtake some of them. Like a spell. Back in the Senseless Sixties, for example, a hi^ official with the states Game and Fish Commission got into hot water over wild ducks. Seems that wildlife officers heard shooting in the woods near Pine Bluff and came upon a trail of duck carcasses with the breasts carved out. The trail led to the state official and another man, who ended up shouldering the blame. The official was suspended pending an investigation, but resigned before a hearing. When hunters disregard the legal limits, theyre cheating the legal hunters, as the judge in this case pointed out. As any school disciplinarian might add, lets hope theyve all learned their lesson by now. Arkansas Demcxaat ^azcttc TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11.1994 Wflliams, board member to host meeting on schools The Little Rock School District will hold a town hall meeting tonight with hosts Superintendent Henry Williams and Little Rock School Board member John Riggs. The 7 p.m. meeting, one in a series the district has scheduled, will be at Fulbright Elementary School, 300 Pleasant Valley Drive.Arkansas Democrat'  THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 1994 LR School Board meets today at Ish The Little Rock School Board will hold its monthly agenda meeting at 5 p.m. today at the old Ish Elementary School building, 3003 S. Pulaski St. The district recently reopened the school to house pupils in pre-kindergarten through third grades who previously attended Chicot Elementary before it was damaged by arson Oct. 13. In addition to setting the agenda for its Nov. 17 meeting, the board will conduct a special meeting to fill an administrative vacancy in the districts data- processing department\ndiscuss a process for selling excess property\nreview the districts budgeting system\nand identify programs to be evaluated this year for their effectiveness.Arkansas Demcx^rat (gazette WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 25, 1995 A I iMi* MMz*nanr Inr LRSD decision-makers huddle to hone skills BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazette Education Writer Little Rock School Board members and the superintendent holed up in a hotel conference room most of Tuesday to stren^hen their working relationships and refine their system for making decisions. New Futures for Little Rock Youth sponsored the training for the board and Superintendent Henry Williams at the Little Rock Hilton Inn. Phillip Schlecty and Marty Vowels, educational consultants from Louisville, Ky,, led the training. New Futures is a collaboration of public and private agencies working in Little Rack to prevent teen-age pregnancy, youth violence and student failure in schools. The agency works closely with the Little Rock School District, Five of the seven Little Rock board members participated in the session. The others couldnt take part in most of the session because of illness or job responsibilities, Schlecty, president of the Center for Leadership in School Reform in Louisville, told school board members their roles should differ from those of other elected officials on governing boards. A school board members responsibility goes beyond representing a group of constituents and working for compromise. Schlecty said. Instead. a school board member should work for the common good of all students in a school district. That should include working with other board members to agree on what is important for students and educating constituents about those agreements and goals, Schlecty said. \"Its hard work. Its boring. It takes lots of conversation, he said of working for consensus. Its so much easier to just represent a constituency. and members Board Williams reviewed and discussed how they function and communicate with each other and the public. The session was held at least in part to prepare the board for coming sessions on the 1995-96 budget. Williams has said the district must cut as much as $8 million in expenses for next year.Arkansas Democrat j WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 1995 Pulaski district grants teacher paid leave for LRSD board time BY CHRIS REINOLDS Democrat-Gazette Staff Writer The Little Rock School Board j president, who teaches in the Pulaski County Special School District. was docked three days pay because she took time oiT to at-  tend board meetings. Classroom Teachers contract states that professional leave may be granted for a school-related or -sponsored activity directly related to professional improvement. Professional leave is granted to improve the instructional program of the district. The contract doesnt limit the But Tuesday night, the Pulaski County Special School Board number of professional days a granted Linda Pondexter paid teacher can use. professional leave. Board mem- Pondexter contended that the bers said Pondexters involve- district didnt apply the professional leave policy fairly. ment in both districts could contribute to solving the desegregation problems that encompass all three districts in the county. If anybody has the opportunity to bridge the gap between the two districts, we need to support them, board member Mildred Im not talking about abusing the leave. Its a day here, a day there, she said. Pondexter said she leaves extensive lesson plans for the days shes absent so her students dont lose important instructional time. My kids are proud of what I do, Pondexter said. Pondexter said she has lost several hundred dollars since she began serving on the Little Rock School Board in 1993. The three days pay the board refused to pay this year would have totaled about $600, Pondexter said. Pulaski County Special Superintendent Bobby Lester said- teachers have served in the past as North Little Rock School Board members but have never been granted professional leave. Instead, those teachers were al\u0026lt; lowed to take unpaid public service leave. I Tatum said. Pondexter, who teachers ninth-grade civics at Fuller Junior High, has asked for three separate days of paid professional leave since being elected board president last fall. The district denied her the pay, and the teachers union has compensated her. My first and foremost job is to educate the children of Pulaski County, Pondexter said. But it is important to extricate ourselves from the desegregation case with interdistrict cooperation. The Pulaski .Association ofArkansas I \u0026gt;ciiKx iat W (bnzclk 7UESDAY, MARCH 14, 1995 O.G. Jacovelli, 49, school board veteran, dies BY SANDRA COX OflfTxwrei-Gftzettfl Staff Wrtlef O.G. Jacovelli. a vocal sevenyear member of the Little Rock School Board who wasn't afraid to take unpopular stances, died early Monday morning of cancer. She was 49. \"She never worried about public opinion, said Linda Pondexter, Little Rock School Board president. \"But she worried about being right\" Jacovelli served on the board since her election in December 1987. She served as board president from September 1991 to January 1993 and as vice president from September 1990 to August 1991. \"We're all saddened, said Dr. Henry Williams, superintendent of Little Rock schools. \"It's an unfortunate and untimely death for a person that has worked so hard to do so much for so many. Oma Glynn Jacovelli was not afraid to make bold moves. For example, she spoke out in 1989 against the appointment of Buffalo. N.Y.. Superintendent Eugene Keville as a Little Rock school desegregation monitor. Angry because the school board voted against appealing U.S. District .Judge Henry Woods order rejecting a proposed desegregation settlement and empowering Keville as the monitor, she made a motion that Southwest Little Kock be de-an-nexed from the district. That motion failed. \"She was a spirited and courageous woman who was a real supporter of education and who, as a school board member, not only was well prepared, but had enormous influences on others. said Skip Kutherford, former Little Kock School Board member and president. Pondexter said it was at Ja-covelli's urging that she ran for board president. Andi Jacovelli was deeply dedicated to the district. Southwest Little Rock in particular, said her sister, Mary Beth Ross of Little Rock. \"This phone rang off the wall the whole time she was on the board until she became sick, Ross said in a telephone interview at her sisters house. \"Calls from parents, calls from teachers, calls from students. She would always call them back. ' Jacovelli was a founder of the McClellan Community School, located at McClellan High School, which serves as a community center and offers various 1 See JACOVELLI, Pago 3B O.G. Jacovelli --------- ------------- OMA GLYNN JACOVELLI, 49, ol Utile Rock, died March 13, 1995. She was a homemaker, a member ol the Little Rock School Board and a Baptist. Survivors Include her husband, Paul Jacovelli\nson, Jason Ross Jacovelli, ot Little Rock\nmother, Sarah Elizabeth Teas, Ft. Smith\ntwo brothers, John P. Teas, Jr. Tulsa, Oklahoma, James H. Teas, Little Rock\ntwo sisters, Dorothy McCartt, Ft. Smith, Mary Beth Ross, Little Rock. Memorial service will be 1 p.m., Wednesday, at the Roller-Drummond Funeral Home Southwest Chapel, with Rev. William Fields officiating. Memorials may be made Io Arkansas Cancer Research Center Tree ol Life, U.A.M.S. Jacovelli  Continued from Page 1B classes to Southwest Little Rock residents. She also took a siie-cial interest in band and music programs in the district. Last October, shortly before cancer began taking its toll on her, she visited Chicot Elementary, which was In her district, aRer it was gutted by fire. The visit was one of her last public appearances as board member. \"She was a woman of passion, conviction and tenacity, said Ann Brown, federal desegregation monitor. \"She fought hard for what she believed was right for children. We lost a very Applicants sought to fill vacant seat The Little Kock School Board will solicit applica-tion. s for the Zone 7 Southwest Little Kock seat lell vacant by Monday's death of O.G. .lacovelli. Snellen Vann, district spokesman, said district policy requires the board to appoint someone to finish a vacated term. Jacovcili'.s term ends in 1997. Vann said the board had not discussed any possible appointments. regular audience members at Little Rock School Board meetings aRer the announcement of the district's student assignment plan. In 1987, she became a candidate for the board In a three-way race for Zone 7, which resulted in a runoff that December with Douglas Hardin. Jacovelli won, with 81 percent of the votes. When re-elected last September, Jacovelli wa.s relieved. \"I take thi.s to mean that I am in touch with the public and I should keep on doing what I am doing. Jacovelli said the night of the election. great lady. .lacovelli wa.s born raised in Fayetteville. She was active in the Fayetteville High School band, playing the clarinet and eventually the saxophone. li, who was in the Navy. The two and had a son. Seventeen years ago, when her husband took a job willi AT\u0026amp;T, the familj moved to Pn-laski County, where her son wa.s a student in the Pulaski And she always dreamed of County Special School District, being a nurse, Ross said. Ja- She volunteered in the school coveili attended Sparks Nursing district, serving as a room moth- School in Fort Smith but never gradnated. In recent years, she had a part time job at the Kroger pharmac.v on Shackleford Koad in Little Kock. er and becoming active in the Parent Teacher.s Association. When her school was annexed to Little Kock's district, she became even more active in While in Fayetteville, she education affairs. .lacovelli, her met and married Paul Jacovel- husband and licr sister became Arkansas Democrat  FRIDAY, MARCH 17, 1995 SWLR candidates sought to serve on school board The Little Rock School Information on the exact Board is seeking applications boundaries is available at the -   -  Pulaski County Election Com\nfrom Southwest Little Rock residents to fill a board vacancy for six months. Applications for the board seat are available at the school mission office or the Pulaski County Board of Education office, both at the county administration building at 201 S. districts administration build- Broadway. _ ing at 810 W. Markham St. School board members don t To aualifv for the seat, left va- receive salaries. qualify The person the remaining six cant by board member O.G. Ja- ' - - covellis death Monday, appli- board members select to fill the cants must be registered voters position will serve until the next school board election in in Pulaski County and live with- ---------- in the boundaries of Zone 7 of September. At that time, the ap- the school board election zones. The zone encompasses the pointee may choose to run for election to represent Zone 7 for the rest of the term, which ex- southwestern part of Little Rock, including most of the pires in September 1997. The deadline for applying area south of Base Line Road.  It also includes a section south for the board seat will be in ear- of Stagecoach Road and west of ly April, 15 days after a legal n^ Chicot Road, tice of the vacancy is published.Arkansas Democrat . SATURDAY, MARCH 18,1995 CoDWWht O UtB Rock Nwpaofj. Inc. O. G. Jacovelli You didnt have to agree with Oma Glynn Jacovelli to adniire her moxie, her dedication to Little Rocks public schools, and the way she always returned phone calls. Mrs. Jacovelli was the kind of citizen-legislator who explains why America works, or anyway why it used to. Her death at the age of 49 this week came as one more blow to a school district that doesnt need any more problems. Count among the mourners the community. It occurs to us at times like these that if every school district had more 0. G. Jacovellis, there would be a lot fewer problems for leaders like her to raise sand about In the end, the solution to the tangled web that all three of the school districts in Pulaski County have so artfully and so long spun around each other doesnt depend on courts or legislatures, but on citizens themselves. If we all just leave education to somebody else, instead of following Mrs. Jacovellis lead, those problems will never be resolved, certainly not the way they should be. Oma Glynn Jacovellis greatest legacy to public education remains her example.WEDNESDAY. MARCH 29,1995 4 seek to fill seat I I on school board opened in SWLR BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazette Education Writer Four Southwest Little Rock residents have applied for the Little Rock School Board vacancy created by the March 13 death of O.G. Jacovelli. So far. the field includes two businessmen, a retired teacher and a community activist. The application deadline is Monday. The school board is advertising, for applicants to fill the position temporarily until the September 1995 school board election. Applicants must be registered voters who live within school board Election Zone 7. which encompasses much of Southwest Little Rock. The present six board members will choose a member from the pool of applicants. The appointment will expire in September when the next regular school board election is held. The appointed member is eligible to run for election then. The four applicants are Douglas Hardin, who ran unsuccessfully for a board position in 1987\nNola Nelms, who retired as a teacher from the Little Rock district three years ago\nDave Cooley, who owns his own lamination supply company\nand Paul Howell,.president of the .Arkansas Council of Vietnam Veterans of America. Hardin, 53, is the credit manager at Jungkind Photo-Graphic. He\nis a 1960 graduate of Central High School and a 1965 graduate of what is now the University of Arkansas at Little Rock. He and hisjwife. Sharon, who works for the' Internal Revenue Service, have two children: a son who will grstduate this year from Central Hi^ and a daughter who will griluate this spring from Notre Dame University. Hardin ran for the Zone 7 board position in 1987 and came in second in a three-way race. He lostthe runoff election to Jacov- ellL I'ive always been interested in the school district and have tried to keep up with it, Hardin said Tuesday. He said he is interested in helping the district improve security, manage its budget and bring an end to court supervision of the district in the 12-year-old school desegregation lawsuit Nelms. 63, worked for the Little Rock district for 23 years at Carver, Romine and Stephens elementary schools before retiring. She has worked 40 years as a teacher after beginning her career in Texas. The mother of two adult daughters. Nelms has a bachelor's degree from the University of -Arkansas at Fayetteville and a masters degree from UALR. Much of her experience in Little Rock came in inner-city schools where the focus has been on raising the achievement levels of black children while enticing whites to voluntarily attend the schools to improve their racial balance. Ive seen a lot of changes in 23 years, Nelms said. Weve made some mistakes, but there are a lot of good things too. Like Hardin, she also said she wanted to help the district meet its desegregation obligations and end the lawsuit. Both Nelms and Hardin said they would be interested in running for election in September. Howell and Cooley could not be reached for comment about their candidacies Tuesday. Cooleys son-in-law said Cooley owns his own business in North Little Rock. Howell is best known for his work in the state on behalf of veterans of the Vietnam War. A former U.S. Marine, he is president of the Arkansas Council of Vietnam Veterans of America. He also is vice president of the Chicot Elementary School Parent-Teacher Association, which has worked hard over the past several months to convince the Little Rock School District to rebuild the school, which arson partially destroyed last October. He most recently sought an appointment to fill a vacancy on the Little Rock Board of Directors.Arkansas Democrat '^(Bazcttc TUESDAY, APRIL 4, 1995 3 more apply for LRSD board seat BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazette Education Writer Three more people submitted applications by Mondays deadline to fill a Little Rock School Board vacancy, bringing the number of applicants for the boards Zone 7 position to seven. Zone 7 encompasses much of Southwest Little Rock. The vacancy was created by the March 13 death of Oma O.G. Jacovelli. The remaining six board members will appoint a person from the applicant pool to serve until the September school board election. The three latest candidates to submit applications are Tina Gatson, Claudius Johnson and Stephanie Johnson. Claudius Johnson, 44. is director of the Dunbar Recreation Center and a 20-year Little Rock Parks and Recreation Department employee. He and his wife Anita have two sons and three daughters who attend Booker Elementary, Magnet Arts Cloverdale Junior High, Henderson Junior High and Parkview High School. He graduated from Philander Smith College with a degree in physical education, and has done postgraduate studies at the University of Arkansas. Gatson. 36, is executive director of the George Washington Carver and College Station branches of the YMCA. She has two sons, who attend McClellan High School and Chicot Elementary School. She is past president of the Chicot Parent Teacher Association. Gatson is a graduate of Portland State University in Portland, Ore. She had a double major of psychology and elementary education. She moved to Little Rock in 1982. Stephanie Johnson, an employee at the Arkansas Department of Health, could not be reached Monday.Arkansas Democraf^Q^azcttc | FRIDAY, APRIL 14, 1995 Ol/ KlowcnarKrc Inz* LR School Board names Johnson to fill seat of late Jacovelli BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazene Education Writer The Little Rock School Board has chosen Stephanie Johnson, a one with tenacity, creativity, objectivity and commitment to service, My desire is to do whatever it takes to make me an effective board member, she said. In response to a question about her views on hiring private project director at the state Department of Health, to temporarily nil the Zone 7 vacancy creat- ----------- _ ed when O.G. Jacovelli died companies to operate the ais- March 13. tricts nonacademic departments. The board voted unanimously Johnson said she was a firm be- Thursday to se- i----- lect Johnson ! after publicly interviewing each of the six applicants for liever in promoting private business. But she also said she would have to know details about the cost of any contract, its feasibility and its impact on einployees, One area I would like to im- uie vacancy, C* prove is the image of the district *hen spending Johnson said, Obviously, there about an hour are a lot of negative images out in a closed ses- j u* there, and people have negative sron, l' 1 perceptions. ' Johnson will Johnson \"This district has so much to serve on the offer. Students who are on the board until the annual school right track truly know the strength of the district and its pro- the Kt election in September. She can run then for election from Zone 7, which encompasses much of Southwest Little Rock. The can- grams. Others interviewed included Tina Gatson, director of the didate elected in September will George Washington Carver YMCA\nserve until September 1997. Dave Cooley, owner of a lamina- Johnson, who has a psychology tion business\nClaudius Johnson, degree from the University of Ar- director of Dunbar Recreational kansas at Little Rock, administers Center\nPaul Howell, a communi- a health promotion project at the ty activist\nand Douglas Hardin, op- Health Department, The project is erations and credit manager for aimed at preventing school jungkind Photo-Graphic, dropouts, substance abuse and teen pregnancy through training in Like Johnson, several of the candidates had experience work- leadership and job skills, ing with youths. Others had finan- Johnsons primaiy duties in- ciai expertise. All but Stephanie elude developing curriculum for Johnson, who is single, have chil- training programs, budgeting, drgn, some of whom are adults, writing grants and monitoring the program. ' Tve been very involved with youth and children here in the city of the Little Rock. Johnson told the board. \"Quite frankly. Ive been on the other side of the fence, meaning that when I meet the children they've already been declared dysfunctional and may already be out of the school system, she sajd. :: -I thought this would be an excellent opportunity to have sorne input on how to keep children in school, to get their test scores up and to present a more positive image of the district.  She described herself as some-4B  FRIDAY, MAY 12, 1995 Teacher hearing halted as LR panel seeks legal opinion BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazette Education Writer The Little Rock School Board will ask the state attorney general for an opinion on whether each of 99 teachers objecting to salary cuts proposed for next! year is entitled to a separate hearing before the board. Board ponders bid to raise tax The boards decision Thursday \"t to seek the opinion cut lyight snort short a planned combined hear- ing for 48 of the 99 teachers. Representatives of the Classroom Teachers Association objected to the combined hearing, saying there were no legal provisions for such a proceeding and their members hadnt agreed to it. The Arkansas Teacher Fair Dismissal Act gives teachers the right to ask for a school board hearing upon being notified by a superintendent that changes in the terms and conditions of their contract will reduce their pay for the next school year. Late last month, the Little Rock district sent certified letters telling 2,500 teachers and administrators that Superintendent Henry Williams had recom- mended that the board cut the work year by two or three days next year, with salaries cut accordingly. Williams is also recommending against incremental pay increases for eligible teachers who traditionally get them for their additional year of experience. The school board has made no final decisions on the recom- mended contract changes. Board members are awaiting the outcome of contract negotiations between district administrators and the Classroom Teachers Association. Brady Gadberry, the districts director of labor relations, argued that the board could hold ar- combined public hearing for the 48 teachers Thursday because each cases circumstances a are identical and no privacy issues are involved. He also said that the contract with teachers and discrimination laws prohibit the board from treating one employee or group of employees differently than any other employee in the same situation. BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazette Education Writer Little Rock School Board members remained undecided Thursday about whether to ask voters in September to approve a tax increase. At their agenda meeting, board members asked Superintendent Henry Williams for information on how much money each additional property tax mill would raise for the schools and how many mills would be necessary to keep the district solvent. Williams asked tlie board to think about whether a millage proposal would be feasible, how the money generated by a millage increase should be spent and how a millage campaign might be conducted. District officials are trying to make about $9 million in cuts and adjustments to balance next years budget. At this time last year, the board had to cut about $7 million in expenses to avoid an illegal deficit in the current year. Williams has said similar cuts might have to continue in subsequent years. The district, which last obtained a millage increase in 1990, has a 43.9-mill tax rate. It isn't among the 135 districts in the state that must seek a tax increase this year to avoid a 10 percent income tax surcharge on their patrons in 1996 as the result of a recent legislative act aimed at districts that dont meet minimum millage requirements for support of schools. The Little Rock district will get a small financial boost from the sale of property adjacent to Forest Heights Junior High School. The board Thursday approved the sale of the University Avenue property for $115,000 to the Mark V. Williamson Co. Inc., an insurance and bonds company. Frank Martin, CTA executive Bestir said she wanted an indi- I* Yidual hearing to get answers to naan t had time to consult with questions about whv the hoard its members about a group hearing and couldn't override an em- questions about why the board wont take actions, such as closing schools, that are more permanent solutions to the districts ployees legal right to a hearing. ov.uuuus lo They have a right to a hear- budget problems mg. and we believe it is a right teacher for 16 Bestir, a Iig ana we neiievci it is a right teacher for 18 years, said she to an individual hearing, he hasn't gotten a salary increase in Said. fwn vparc hpranco u 7\n, two years because she is ineligi- .liJh ** I incremental increase. Teacher Jennifer Farley said proposed budget cuts for next teachers didn't get notice of the liearing set for Thursday until . 1  ''' cosThe'ras mucii nev and benefits, ney for the CTA, said that while Once an employee requests a rontrlct''r,?dn'r ^ r ' *\"'\"K. the board is obligated to contract reduction notices, conduct it within five to 10 days teachers niight have iiidividiial unless both the board and the defenses that might cause their employee agree in writing to a contracts to be renewed without delay. Additional employees cnanges. could ask for hearings hetwopn as After the meeting, teacher Jo between now and May 30.I Arkansas Democrat ^(Bazcttc  WEDNESDAY, JULY 26,1995  OMalley chooses not to seek return to LRSD school board T. Kevin OMalley, a member of the Little Rock School Board since 1993, said Tuesday that he will not seek re-election in September to the Zone 2 position. OMalley cited family and job responsibilities as his reasons for not running for another term. A staff attorney for the Arkansas Board of Review, OMalley and his wife have two young sons. As of Tuesday, no one had filed as a candidate from Zone 2, which encompasses central Little Rock, including the Broadmoor and University Park neighborhoods near the campus of the University of Arkansas at Little Rock. Also, no candidates have filed for the Zones 4 and 7 positions on the board, but the incumbents, John A. Riggs IV and Stephanie Johnson, have announced that they intend to run. Zone 4 encompasses northwest Little Rock and Zone 7 covers Southwest Little Rock, including Otter Creek subdivision. The deadline for filing with the Pulaski County Election Commission as a candidate in the Sept. 19 school board elections is Aug. 4.Arkansas Democrat C^azett^ THURSDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1995 Jty I I W I CoowWitC UB* Rock Nowkokoera. Inc. New board member says wifes job not nepotism emocrat-Gazstte staff 'The Little Rock School Boards newest member says a district policy against nepotism wont affect his family, although his wife is an instructional aide at Henderson Junior High School. The board has a policy against hiring anyone related to a member of the school board, the superintendent or senior-level administrators who report directly to the superintendent. The policy applies to spouses, siblings, grandparents, parents, children. aunts, uncles and even first cousins. Michael Daugherty said his wife, Sherry, has worked for the district for eight years and was a district employee before the nepotism policy was revised and adopted in 1994. He pointed out a policy clause that says the the policy will be applied prospectively and not affect the employment of anyone who was an employee when the policy adopted. was Daugherty said he conferred with several attorneys before entering the school board race. He produced an Aug. 25 letter from Mark Riable, a Little Rock lawyer, who said that after reviewing state laws and district policy he believed that Sherry Daughertys employment was not an issue Uiat would affect Daughertys candidacy. Daugherty was elected to the board 'Tuesday night in a runoff election against the Rev. Robert Willin^am. Daugherty replaces T. Kevin OMalley on the board.Arkansas Democrat ------- TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 7..1995 EDITORIALS r .1 Illi i\u0026gt; II III ii I II III. I H.iiiiimil HIIiHIHH lU li !iJi I MI J School games in Little Rock A wake-ufj call to tlie school board A patron of Little Rocks scliool districtn. Baker Kurris, wlio has three cliildren in the public schoolspretty well summed up the publics disgust with politics-as-usual on the local school board. We are out here trying to recruit parents to the schools, he said of parents like himself, while members of the school board are rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Here the school district is facing bankniptcy as desegregation hinds from the state nin out\na big contract for janitorial services turns out to be legally dubious\nthe school district is still mired in the i web of the law, complete with the usual legal fees\nand yet the board cant find anything better to do tlian play games with its school superintendents contract. Henry Williams, the first superintendent in years who shows promise of hanging around for a good while, now has been denied the conventional third-year extension of his contractby a vote of 4-to-3. Its clear that the school district has problemsand potentialon a large scale. During the last school year, a total of 4,!58O students left the district or 18 percent of enrollment. Yet the school district doesnt conduct exit interviews, and so can't report the reasons families give for leaving little Rocks public schools. Amazing. And sad. After all these years, the district still doesnt conduct the most rudimentary survey to find out why its I losing students. Any private outfit . that kissed off its clientele this way\nwouldnt be in business very long. Its as though the school system still hasn't realized its in a service : business and needs to learn some things about marketing. Many par-\nenis understand tlie problem, which is why theyre organizing a group (Parents in Public Schools) that would let patrons address the board and the bureaucracy with a united voiceand also tell tlie rest of us about the good tilings tliat go on in Little Rocks schools. It should be no surprise by now tliat the school district must attract more students if its going to maintain standards. To quote one finding by a committee of citizens that is drawing up a strategy for the school district: The current trend of declining student enrollment must be reversed, since future State revenue will be based on the number of students in the District Any interested observer can make some good giesses about why the district is losing students, just from reading interviews in the paper. Families are worried about discipline in the schools. Parents dont see enough other parents getting involved. 'The public, especially now, needs to see the superintendent and school board working together to attack the districts problems. Instead, the patrons see the board vote 4-to-3 against extending Dr. Williams contract There is talk about sending him a message, and nimors about some members wanting to replace him, and other fun- andgames. Meanwhile, business piles up. serious No matter how many businesses relocate to Little Rock, or how much construction is approved at the polls, no city can prosper if its public schools dont With the danger signs mounting, and conscientious parents coming together to lobby for the schools, what is the school board doing? Fooling with the superintendents contract Anybody who wants to send Hank Williams a message needs to consider using the U.S. Mails or Southwestern Bell\nvotes at school board meetings should not be conftised with Western Union. Speaking of sending a message, somebody needs to tell this school board to wake up and get serious. Because education is serious business. Not just for students and their families but for the whole community. This is Little Rocks future the public schools are shaping Or misshaping i1 Arkansas Democrat j -------- FRIDAY, DECEMBER 8, 1995 -------- 90 minutes per class up for study NLR board weighs changing schedule BY SUSAN ROTH Democrat-Gazette Education Writer North Little Rock High School students could have radically different schedules next fall if the school board approve.s a proposal to extend class periods to 90 minutes. Students at both the east and west campuses of the high school now have seven-period day.s with 50 minutes for each class. Under the new plan presented to the school board Thursday, they would have four extended class periods each day. Several board members applauded the proposal, but they did not take a vote. Administrators asked the board to consider Teachers say theyre working harder than ever before, but they would never go back, Chadwick said. ^ost administrators and teachers-at both schools are solidly behind the proposal. Several spoke enthusiastically about how working together on the research had dramatically boosted teacher morale. Some teachers are concerned about scheduling for foreign language classes and athletics, but Chadwick said everything can be worked out Were newcomers to this, but so many others have already waded through these waters and answered these questions. he said. Teachers said students are skeptical about having longer classes, but they may like having room for an extra elective. \"Students are stressed out. They have too much going on at once. said Bryan Duffie. a math teacher at the east campus who helped develop the plan. We think this can relieve some of their daily stress, and if we can alleviate some of that, it would help.\" Student stress could be re- lieved by having only four classes the plan at its January meeting so' instead of seven, some noted. they can put it into effect next fall. There are two possible schedOf the usual 50-minute period, only 27 minutes are considered quality instructional time be- ule plans for this block schedul- cause of interruptions, discipline ing concept. Students either See CLASSES, Page 3B would have the same four classes every day for a semester and then take four different classes at midyear, or they would take a total of eight classes at once, with four each day on alternating days for the entire year. Groups of teachers and administrators from each school spent ! the past two years researching similar programs at other high schools around thecountry.  Educators say the longer class- Classes  Continued from Page 2B and paperwork, said Anita es improve student discipline and j grades as well as teacher creativ- i ily. In the past six to eight years, : the concept has become the latest i thing in secondary education, es- ' Cameron, vice principal at the west campus. In addition to the additional class time, Cameron said, the new schedule would\n Allow teachers more time for planning and preparation because they would get a 90-minute prep period each day.  Provide enough time for teachers to present complete concepts.  Improve students comprehension by immersing them in the subject  Reduce the chaos and disciplinary problems associated with class changes by cutting them from six a day to three.  Foster innovations in teaching and allow more time for extra student participation, experimentation, lab work and guest presentations. pecially in other Southern states. ! In Arkansas, 12 to 15 schools have some version of block sched- I tditig while many others are I studying the idea, said Dana i tliadwick, director of North Little Rock secondary school administration. Chadwick said experts believe block scheduling will , .soon completely replace the tra- i (litional seven-period day.I [End spats FRIDAY, DECEMBER 8, 1995 LR board 9 A- rr is advised Find solutions or face disaster, patrons say BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazette Education Writer Prominent Little Rock School District patrons appealed to school board members Thursday night to quit their political in- lighting and, instead, seek solutions to desegregation and money problems that are threatening to bankrupt the citys education system. r*ir. / 4m*- 'M L4^\\ J ^. ^aZ-s-^ 1? Sj nf? SO .KS .. Mtjf t. -M* In an unusual demonstration of community interest in the health of the public schools, corporate chief executive officers, parents, former school board members, community activists and Gov. Jim Guy Tucker turned .r' 1 'S hi* out for the special meeting Tucker did not speak. Little Rock School District Superintendent Henry Williams We need to transcend the di- members listen Thursday night as visiveness, the bitterness the reversing the racism and the mistrust and de- enrollment their top priority. Shulls and seven vote our full attentionand resources to the essential task of Little Rock School District student to meet the challenges of the 21st centu- ly. Baker Kurrus, a father and lawyer, told the board. Arkansas Democral-Gazelta/DAVID GOTTSCHALK Other speakers expressed concern for the school district and appealed to administrators to resolve the districts financial and desegregation-related problems during a special meeting called in response to parents' petitions. The board called the special meeting in response to petitions from more than 500 district pa- irons. About 125 people attended the orderly session, during u/ninh AirU4- _______I______  which eight speakers  renewed their commitment to the district but also chastised the district J , spelled out what would happen if the system goes bankrupt. Several speakers also asked the board to extend Superintendent Henry Williams two-year contract so he will have the full three-year contract permitted by state law. The board voted 4-3 against the extension Oct. 31. Williams has said repeatedly in recent months that the district IS scheduled to lose $5 million in state desegregation funds next year. The loss of those funds coupled with loss of state aid due to a declining student rollment, means the district i en-  - -UlULtltl can- 'r\"Plemeiit all parts I desegregation 31an, Williams has said. The district has cut about $7 nillion in expenses in each of ---I------- **i cavil UI he past two years but will have 0 close some schools next year See LRSD, Page 16AArkansas Democrat (gazelle FRIDAY, DECEMBER 8, 1995 LRSD . Continued from Page 1A to save money. .Rhett Tucker, the chairmanelect of the Greater Little Rock Chamber of Commerce and the father of two public school students, announced he will make state takeover. A 1995 statute allows the state to take over systems in distress. Such a takeover been achieved. But he warned that the aging plan is causing resegregation must be modified im- could result in the replacement of mediately. He urged the parties in the 13-year old court case to be the superintendent and staff, a new board election or the annexa- diplomatic, bold, unselfish and tion of the district to another more viable district. He asked district courageous. The five school board mem- ofiicials to make improvement hers at the meeting listened quiplans now before they are direct- etly to the presentation, which support of the public schools his ed to do so by the state. was interrupted six times by loud Surely local control is better applause, but made no comment top priority during his term. , Jhe well-being of the city and its people depend on the health of. the district. Tucker said, recalling a time a few years ago when a Fortune 500 company considered Little Rock as a site for its business. Three days of ap- than yet another external influ- ence, another cook in the kitchen, Argue said. at the conclusion of the session. Later, board member Katherine Mitchell said the unprece- Ben Smith, one of the founders dented meeting lifted her out of of the new Parents for Public Schools, told the board that he is aware of the districts attributes. the despair she often feels about the districts problems. It made me feel really good, pointments between company and city officials were planned. But. after corporate executives which are rarely publicized  she said. I didnt know that such as the scholarships students many people were knowledge- earn and learning programs. He able about the district and its reqd newspaper accounts of said his organization wants to problems. .scjiool district problems, they serve as the messenger to the But board member Michael canceled their appointments and public about the quality of the Daugherty said the group was lefl'town. .The next 18 months are criticalto the future of public educa- tidri in our city, Tucker said. We believe that the time is now schools. preaching to the choir Thursday Steve Shults, a Little Rock night. He said board members lawyer, asked the board to make it a No. 1 priority to stem the enare well aware of the problems. As for administrative stability, he rollment declines and then work said Williams creates that insta- for-bold new action. The business energetically to make prudent bility by looking for other jobs in community stands ready to do budget decisions. He said the board should focus what we can to be of assistance, he said. other cities. Other board members in atten- on what is best for students, not dance were John Riggs IV, presi- on the desires of any special in[ We can supply a lot of volun- in- dent Linda Pondexter and Pat eer help, and business and fi- terest group of parents, employ- Gee. Absent were Judy Magness ancial expertise and experience you will only ask John Steuri, cliairman and chief executive of- licer of Alltel Information Sys- ees or others. Further, it should and Sue Strickland. extend Williams contract, Shults said, citing Williams reputation as an effective leader who has tejns. told the board. made strides in managing the de- i We care and we want to help, segregation plan and budget bijt the bickering and the person- problems. We need Dr. Henry Williams aljattacks and the personal agen- das have got to stop, and everyone has got to work together to with all of his energy, creativeness, diligence and experience to help us resolve this mess were stthve these problems, he said. It is clear that there are highly in, Steuri said. Since JuneJ.982, diisruptive forces in this commu-  '   nijty who are profiting from this mpss and are hurting our schools arid the children whom we are weve had seven superintendents or acting superintendents in this school district. How do we expect parents to stay in our school district when we cannot even provide an environment where superintendents want to stay? Kurrus said: The more than desperately trying to educate. I am concerned that we will spend 1997 observing the 40th anniversary of the Central High Crisis of 1957 by experiencing yet 500 people who petitioned for another embarrassing, damaging this meeting have told you in a arid unnecessary public school very dramatic way that they care about this district, that they care about its students and that they party to that. care about the future of this com- :Rep. Jim Argue, D-Little Rock munity. He told the board that many of crlsis, Steuri said. And I don't think that any of us want to be a aftd the father of two public school students, warned the board the components of the districts th^t financial ruin could lead to a complex desegregation plan haveAricansas Democrat gazette FRIDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1995  The choir is out of tune In response to Little Rock School Board member Michael Daughertys remark that me group was preaching to the choir at the 7 meeting, let me say to Daugherty that the choir is singing out of tune, and it is the congregation that must listen and the congregation that must suffer. What a pity that sitting in the congregation are our children M.W.SMYLY Little Rock2B  THURSDAY, JANUARY 11, 1996 Pulaski Arkansas Democrat ngr (gazette LRSD to halt televising special school board meetings oemocrawiazBite Edurata^iwter members conferred with and students ns nart nf  tcicH.  , __ n. I uTT superintendent over an  R^k School Di^ict dent where he threatened a news- 1. ., paper photographer. Sueilen Vann, the districts di- plans to stop televising the school boards special meetings and agenda meetings because of a lack of money. conferred with and students as part of a televi- nt production course at Metropolitan Vocational Technical Skills Center, Vann said. inci- thou^t that broadcasting the dis- rector of communications, said this week that the district will I^e change generated a hand- continue to televise the regiiiar fill of complaints to the distnct board meetings held the fourth last week when a special school Thursday of each month. There is bo^ meetingthe first meeting no direct cost to the district for meetings because broadcast During that meeting, they are produced by a teacher The district has televised the regular monthly meetings for several years on Comcast Cable Television Channel 4. Almost a year ago, the district started broadcasting its special and agenda board meetings because board members were trying to cut the districts budget and tnougnt Up until now, broadcasts of the cussioM would be important to special meetings and agenda j . meetings were produced by said the special meeting Bruce Miles. Miles is a district broadcasts were not budgeted for teacher, but he has his own video school year. She took money production company from other p^ of her communi- He produced the meetings cations department bu^et to pay through a business arrangement for broadcaste dunng the first se- between the district and his com- mester. Tom^ts 5 p.m. agenda pany at about $50 an hour, Vann meeting will be televised, but it said. will be the last such broadcast, Vann said. agenda It's not practical to expect the teacher and his students to pro- I I duce all the meetings, Vann said. Many of the students have afterschool jobs and the special meetings are ftequently scheduled by the board with less than a days notice. Additionally, students have transportation problems getting to and from the meetings, which are held in the districts downtown administration building. The meetings often run late into the evening'\"A^sasPemocrat^i^^g^  MONDAY, FEBRUARY 5,1996  Uniforms and the fight against TASS ,  Michael Daugherty called the other day with an update on hijand now the presidentsidea to require that students in public schools wear uniforms. The still-new member of Little Rocks school board wants everybody to know that hes making good on his campaign pledge. He proudly reports that, as of February 1st uniforms were to be required for students in Little Rocks alternative schools. These are the kids most at risk to be^n with, he says. Its a big test case for getting (uniforms) districtwide. Will it work? Who knows? But if it means schools will be safer, lets give it a whirl Besides, some of us remember uniforms as a way to eliminate one more distraction when kids are on the lookout for any at all. When battling TASSTeenage Attention Span Syndrome-teachers need all the help they can get (A note to critics\nUniforms dont give the false impression that all students are the same, just that theyre all in the same boat) We cant wait to see how the new classroom attire works in the alters native schools. Congratulations, Mr. Daugherty, on accomplishing the extraordinary\nYou ve kept a campaign promise. Talk about brazen. ( i 1Arkansas Democrat W (gazette THURSDAY, MARCH 14, 1996 New school board needed ' Seven superintendents in the Little Rock school system in the past nine years. It should be quite apparent to any and all thinking people that what is needed is a new school board, not a new superintendent ' That is a shameful record. DAVID W. HANSON - - Fairfield BayARKANSAS TIMES  APRIL 5. 1996  T1 le Insider In transit The question isnt if, but when and under what terms Henry Williaiiis will depart as Little Rock school superintendent. The Insider has learned that a lawyer for the School Board (or should we say a lawyer See page 3 796756 0 6 Coniiniied from page I dispatched for the Board by President Linda Pondexter) and a lawyer for Williams met for the first time Tuesday to hammer out details of a buyout. .Jerry Malone of the Friday firm and James Penick reponedly tu e handling the chores for the Board and Wil- liams.respectively. Williams$115.(XX) contract runs through the 1996-97 school year. What's next Will the Little Rock School Board (or Czarina Pondexter) be ready with a replacement superintendent to spring on an unsuspecting public when they spring the Williams settlement? No. look for appointment of an interim management committee to run the district until a replacement is chosen. Names mentioned as possible participants on such a committee\nAssociate Superintendent Vic Anderson\nMann Magnet Principal Marian Lacey, and ad man Skip Rutherford, who helped write the current desegregation plan while a member of the School Board. Power mad Add School Board Member Mike Daugherty to the list of of public officials who believe their position exempts them from rule.s of common courtesy. After Pulaski Heights Junior High Principal Mona Briggs wrote Daugherty to object to the School Boards decision to reject janitorial schedule changes meant to improve efficiency, Daugherty responded: You asked why I didnt ask for input from you prior to voting for the change. If the truth be known, I neither desire nor\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eLittle Rock School District\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"ndd_bsams_01015","title":"Box 1, Folder 15: Contact lists, 1991-1998","collection_id":"ndd_bsams","collection_title":"Black Student Alliance records, 1969-2006","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, North Carolina, Durham County, Durham, 35.99403, -78.89862"],"dcterms_creator":["Duke University. Black Student Alliance"],"dc_date":["1991/1998"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":null,"dcterms_publisher":["Black Student Alliance Records, 1996-2006, Black Student Alliance Records, Duke University Archives, David M. Rubenstein Rare Book \u0026 Manuscript Library, Duke University."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["African American college students--North Carolina--Durham","African Americans--North Carolina--Durham--History","African Americans--North Carolina--Durham--Political activity","African Americans--North Carolina--Durham--Social conditions","African Americans--North Carolina--Durham--Social life and customs","African Americans--North Carolina--History--Archival resources","African Americans--North Carolina--Political activity","Duke University. Black Student Alliance","Duke University--Students--Social conditions","Duke University--Students--Societies, etc.","Duke University--Students--Political activity","Student participation in administration"],"dcterms_title":["Box 1, Folder 15: Contact lists, 1991-1998"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["David M. Rubenstein Rare Book \u0026 Manuscript Library"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://library.duke.edu/rubenstein/findingaids/uabsa/#bsams01015"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":["[Identification of item], Black Student Alliance Records, Duke University Archives, David M. Rubenstein Rare Book \u0026 Manuscript Library, Duke University."],"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["rosters"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"tmll_hpcrc_69150709","title":"A broken trust : the Hawaiian homelands program : seventy years of failure of the federal and state governments to protect the civil rights of native Hawaiians","collection_id":"tmll_hpcrc","collection_title":"Historical Publications of the United States Commission on Civil Rights","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Hawaii, 20.78785, -156.38612"],"dcterms_creator":["United States Commission on Civil Rights. Hawaii Advisory Committee"],"dc_date":["1991"],"dcterms_description":["A digital version of the report published by the United States Commission on Civil Rights.","The Civil Rights Digital Library received support from a National Leadership Grant for Libraries awarded to the University of Georgia by the Institute of Museum and Library Services for the aggregation and enhancement of partner metadata."],"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":null,"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":["Forms part of online collection: Historical Publications of the United States Commission on Civil Rights.","Requires Acrobat plug-in to view files."],"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["Homestead law--Hawaii","Hawaiians--Land tenure","Public lands--Hawaii","Hawaiian Homes Commission"],"dcterms_title":["A broken trust : the Hawaiian homelands program : seventy years of failure of the federal and state governments to protect the civil rights of native Hawaiians"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Thurgood Marshall Law Library"],"edm_is_shown_by":["http://www2.law.umaryland.edu/Marshall/usccr/documents/cr12h313z.pdf"],"edm_is_shown_at":["http://crdl.usg.edu/id:tmll_hpcrc_69150709"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports","records"],"dcterms_extent":["84 p. ; 28 cm."],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_287","title":"Care Program Staff manual and other documents","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1991/1999"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Educational planning","School-age child care","Student assistance programs"],"dcterms_title":["Care Program Staff manual and other documents"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/287"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n*-M 1 CA\u0026gt; CARE Program Rockefeller School 700 E. 17 Little Rock, AR 72206 Child's Name Child's Doctor or Clinic - Doctor or ClinicAddress- Hospital Preference Phone ------------------ Describe medical conditions, physical or mental problems, etc. the CARE staff should know about your child: In case of emergency, I auorize the C ARE Program to arrange for medical/dental care and transportation to the hospital or doctor of my choice or the hospital nearest to the school. CARE cannot assume financial liability for injuries, student accident insurance is available through the school office. I have read and understand the Care Program Discipline Plan. I accept responsibility for paying tuition charges according to CARE policies and procedures. Date Signature of Parent or Guardianf y CARE Program F Little Rock School District The CARE Program is anon-profit, self-supporting program of child care provided for elementary-age students and parents of the Little Rock School District. The program operates before and after school and all day on most school holidays. The CARE Program provides a structured program of creative activities and recreation in a nurturing environment. Varied group and independent activities are planned according to the students' ages and interests. The goals of the CARE PROGRAM are:  to provide a safe environment for students before and after school  to offer a wide variety of creative and recreational activities  to help create a positive school attitude  to encourage acceptable social and play skills - to help each child develop a positive self image LOCATIONS A CARE Program is located in LRSD elementary schools where there are a minimum of 15 participants between the ages of 5 -12 years and at selected schools for 4 year olds. received in the CARE Office on or before the 15th of each month for the upcoming month. example: October payment is due September 15th ilications are available for reduced rates at Incentive Schools HOURS Each program operates from 7:00 A.M. until school opens and from the close of school until 5:30 P.M. (6:(X) P.M. at Incentive School\u0026lt;J (y\u0026gt;^^^nklin, Garland, Ish,Mitchell, Rightsell, Rockefeller, Stephens), requirements are based on family size and income. on regular school days. During most school lol 's, from 7:00 A.M. to 5:30 P.M. at specified schools. The CARE Program is also open at several accessible schools when LRSD schools are closed due to severe weather. When school is closed for any reason before the normal dismissal time, CARE begins operation at the earlier time. FOOD SERVICES CARE provides a nuiritous breakfast and snack prepared by the LRSD Food Services Department Registration Fee J Full-time (5 days @ wk.) Part-time (4 days @ wk.) Part time (3 days \u0026lt; wk.) Part time (2 days @ wk.) Part time (1 day @ week) 3 Day Drop-in @$4.50 @day Holiday (reservations required) \"Snow\" Day 6.00 69.25 @ month 56.00 @ month 42.00 @ month 28.00 @ month 14.00 @ month 13.50 @ card 7.00 @ day 7.00 @ day SUPERVISION The CARE Program is supervised by a certified leacher/supervisor. A ratio of one adult instructor to every 18 children is maintained at each site. COST Monthly payments for regular school days, not including holidays, are averaged over nine equal payments. These payments must be REGISTRATION To register, return the completed registration form to the CARE Program Office with the $6.00 registraticn fee and 1st month tuition. The program will be available at schools with a minimum of 15 children participating on a monthly basis. If CARE is not offered due to an insufficient number of participants at a school, fees will be refunded. For further information, please call the CARE Program Office at 324-2395. $ CARE PROGRAM REGISTRATION TO REGISTER for 1991-92, mail $6.00 registration fee, 1st month tuition and completed form (front and back) to: ATTENDANCE AND FEES (Check one): Full-time and part-time fees are due two weeks in advance. example: October payment is due September 15 CARE Program 700 E. 17th Little Rock, AR 72206 Telephone: 324-2395  Full-time (5 days @ wk.)  Part-time (4 days @ wk.) . Part-time (3 days @ wk.) - Part-time (2 days @ wk.) - Part-time (1 day @ week) -3 Day Drop-in @ 4.50 @ day -Holiday (reservations required) -Snow\" Day $ 69.25 @ month 56.00 @ month 42.00 @ month 28.00 @ month 14.00 @ month 13.50 @ card 7.00 @ day 7.00 @ day Child's Name. Date Of Birth School Grade Date To Enter Care Mothers Name Fathers Name. Address- Zip Address Zip Phone (Home). (Woric) .Work Hours. Phone (Home) (Worit). .Work Hours_____ Emergency Information: Name, address and telq)hoDe numbers of persons to contact other than parent/guardian (2 required). Name. Address Plione (Home) (Work) Name Address Phone (Home) (Work) Persons Authorized to Pick Up Child: How/where did you first hear about the CARE Program? (check one) school friend/relative previously enrolled other COMPLETE AND SIGN OTHER SIDE OF FORM4 [Arkansas Democrat  SUNDAY, APRIL 18, 1999 { LR district tests waters on program The Little Rock School District will offer a before-school and afterschool care program at its eight new middle schools beginning next fall if there is sufficient parent interest District officials this week mailed notices asking parents of pupils in grades five through seven to preregister their children for the senice by Friday, A minimum of 15 full-time participants will be needed to open and operate the care program at each of the schools. To preregister, parents must complete a form and pay a $50 nonre- fundable deposit The district offers child care at its elementary schools but not at the ju- The care program fees include a $20 registration and charges ranging from $20 a month for one day of care a week to $100 a month for five days a week. nior highs for students in grades seven through nine. As part of plans to convert the junior highs into middle schools for sixth-, seventh- and eighthgraders, some parents had asked for an e.xpansion of the care program. The program is to provide creative and recreational time for students. The cai-e program fees include a S20 registration and charges ranging from J20 a month for one day of care a week to $100 a month for five days a week. The program hours will be 7 a JU. until the start of classes and from school dismissal until 6 p.m. More information or a preregistration form is available at the districts C.ARE progi'am office at 100 S. Arch Si or from the office at 324-2395. The schools planning to offer the program include Cloverdale. Dunbar. Forest Heights, Henderson, Mabel- vale, Mann, Pulaski Heights, and Southwest schools\nall will be middle schools next year.Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 Date: To: From: Re: April 20, 1999 Junious Babbs, Brady Gadberry, Bonnie Lesley, Sadie Mitchell Ann Bro,wnlk(4^___^ Request ror Information Im sending this memo to all of you hoping that it will increase the odds that I can get a small but critical bit of information. Does anyone know for sure what hours Dunbar Middle School will operate next year' Heres an overview of my plight: As the parent of an elementary school child who will be a 7' grader at Dunbar Middle School next year, I recently received in the mail a brochure for the new CARE Program in the middle schools, including a pre-registration form (copy enclosed). The literature explains that CARE will be available from 7 a.m. until school startup and from school dismissal until 6 p.m.\" and invites me to send a non-refundable $50 deposit to secure a place for my child. Ive used CARE for my children since its inception almost 20 years ago, so Im very familiar with the program. I know that my familys need for CARE depends on the time that school starts in the morning and lets out in the afternoon. Moms got the morning covered, and if school is over late, like 3:50 p.m.. Dad can pick up child and we dont need CARE. But if schools over early, say 2:30 p.m., thats another story and we need CARE. What a simple criterion: to determine whether or not to sign up for CARE, all I have to know is what hours middle school classes will operate. But guess what: no one can tell me! Not only do the school startup and school dismissal hours not appear on the CARE brochure, my phone calls to several offices (including that of CARE, Student Registration, Dunbar, and an associate superintendent) uncovered no one who could tell me with certainty what hours the middle schools will operate. How can the district expect parents to plunk down a non-refundable $50 and sign up tor a program four months in advance without having such a basic piece of information? Not only is a non-refundable $50 deposit outrageous (its way out of line with the programs price history, it isnt clear if it covers or is in addition to the $20 pre-registration fee, and is it still non- refundable if the minimum 15 students dont sign up?), its just plain bad business to expect parents to make a hefty non-refundable down payment on a service they may or may not need depending on school hours that no one can disclose at the time parents are being asked to pre-register. Given these circumstances, it wont be surprising if CARE isnt overwhelmed with sign-ups for its maiden venture into the middle schools. But will any dearth of pre-registration indicate a lack of need or rather parents unwillingness to risk losing fifty bucks on a service that may prove to be unneeded depending on the elusive school hours?Paoe Two April 20, 1999 In asking for your help in learning what hours Dunbar Middle School will operate next year, Im also asking that you carefully examine the scope, quality, and consistency of the customer service processes that need to be in place to effectively support those who are most directly affected by the transition to middle schools, namely parents, students, and teachers. As a parent. Ive already had very unhappy, frustrating experiences trying to navigate the shoals of a decidedly customer-unfriendly course selection process for middle schools. Now Im exasperated by the unsolved mystery of the middle school hours. And Ill bet Im not the only one. Enc.TO\nFROM: fJECHVIED MAY 1339 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATiONMOfllTOfii^'G Ann Brown, Federal Monitor, Office of Desegregation Monitoring T\"^Martha Rogers, CARE Program Supervisor DATE: April 26, 1999 RE: Middle School Hours Ann, I received a copy of your memo and I can understand your frustration. I apologize if our office was partly responsible. The response from the parent survey regarding CARE for middle schools, did not indicate a need for CARE. In order to try to pursue the concept. The Little Rock School District felt that we could better determine a need if parents were asked to make a commitment by requiring a non- refundable deposit. The intention was that if it was determined that there was a need, and a CARE site opened, the deposit would be used for the registration fee and pan of the tuition fee. If CARE did not open at a particular school, the money would be refunded. If a site opened and based on the number of students interested, the staff would be hired and supplies and equipment would be purchased, those parents who withdrew from those programs would not be refunded the deposit. We stated in the middle school brochure that CARE hours would be from 7:00 a.m. until the start of school and from school dismissal until 6:00. Again I apologize that I was unable to confirm the middle school hours for you. If 1 can be of help in the future, please dont hesitate to call me.LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PUPIL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Hay 3, 1999 TO: Ann Brown, Fed^al Honitor, ODH FROM: Jo Fvalyn Blstoity Director ot Pupil services SUBJECT: Follow-up: \"Reguest for information\" 1999 Junious forwarded to me a copy of your memo dated April 20, 1999, regarding guestions and concerns you have about opening and closing times for district middle schools for 1999-2000 and the CARE program deposit for middle school students. First, let me respond to your comments regarding the hours of CARE alluded to in the CARE Middle School registration information that was sent out. Since no information regarding a change in the opening and closing times for junior high/middle schools had been distributed from the District, we made the assumption that the hours would be the same or with only a slight modification. Consequently, we thought it would be safe to indicate that the CARE hours from \"7:00 a.m. until school start-up and from school dismissal until 6\n00 p.m. would PeJR. n capture any minor deviations from the current school schedule if changes in school opening and closing times were subsequently made. If we are to be The reason we made the decision to require a deposit for CARE at Middle Schools is because of our need to determine staffing requirements for 19992000 based on the number of students registered for CARE at specific school locations. _______________ ready to open CARE in new sites in August, staff will have to be recruited and trained, as well as furnishings and equipment purchases made before school starts. This deadline really forces us to have firm participation intentions, early on before this school year ends because of the front-end start-up expenses that would have to be obligated. The In our view, a deposit would indicate a firm intent on the part of parents to participate in the CARE program. The deposit would be credited toward the first months tuition, so it would not be lost. However, if we do not receive the minimum of twelve students to open a CARE site, the deposit would be refunded to the parent. The deposit would only be \"non refundable\" if the parent failed to fill his/her reserved slot. Conditions for a refundable or non refundable deposit were not addressed in the CARE registration information that was distributed. Me apologize tor any confusion or inconvenience this may have caused. Please feel free to call ae if we need to discuss further.STAFF MANUAL REVISED 1991-92 RECEIVED CARE PROGRAM STAFF MANUAL OCT 2 8 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS Office of Desegregation Monitoring I . Introduction 1 II . III. A. B. Program Description Program Goals...... Personnel Policies A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I . J. K. L. M. N. 0. Employee Dual ifications..... Organizational Relationships Selection of Personnel...... Performance Responsibilities Staff Training and Support.. Licensing Requirements...... Conditions of Employment.... Terminations and Due Process Grievances................... Compensation.................. Hours of Work....... Fringe Benefits.............. Service Records.............. Change of Address........... Guidelines for Site Staff... Program Policies 1 1 .4 .4 .4 . 5 .6 .6 .6 .7 .9 .9 .9 10 10 10 10 13 A. B. C. D. E. F. 6. H. I . J . K. L. M. N. 0. Office Check-in...................... Payrol 1 Time Sheets........... Attendance............................. Tuition........................ Late Fees................................ Field Trips. ......................... Parent Sign-Out Sheets.............. Injuries and Accidents............... Medications............................ Inventory and Supply Requests....... Food Service Requirements............ Building Pass. . ........................ Confidentiality. ............. Suspected Child Abuse or Neglect.... Fire, Tornado, and Earthquake Drills 14 14 14 14 14 15 15 15 15 16 16 16 17 17 17 IV. Daily Site Procedures 19 A. B. C. D. Staff Arrival....... Check-In of Children Snack Time........... Active Play......... 20 20 21 22E. P . 6. H. Activity Time H ree P1ay . . . Sign Cut of Children........... Close Down and Staff Departure V. Discipline A. B. C. D. E. Philosophy of CARE Discipline Plan... Discipline Plan........................ Guidelines for Staff................... How to Communicate with CARE Children Handling Common Behavior Problems.... 26 27 29 29 29 VI . Programming with Children A. B. C. D. E. F. Activities....................................... Daily Schedule................................... Time Schedule for Regular School Days....... Time Schedule for Long Days/Holidays........ Activity Ideas...............................   Procedures for Inclement Weather Conditions. 34 34 35 36 36 371 CARE PROGRAM I . INTRODUCTION A. Program Description As a school-age child care service, the CARE Program B. provides an informal and unique environment for children of different, ages to live and learn together. maintains CARE structured environment to insure order and safety, yet provides children with opportunities to make choices and activities. become involved in both group and independent The program includes a wide range of social. recreational, and creative opportunities. Program Goals a The CARE Program staff strives to achieve the following goals: -to provide a safe environment for students before and after school, -to offer a wide variety of creative and recreational activities, -to help children feel good about themselves and develop positive attitudes toward school, growth in -to encourage relationships and social skills.! ! b ''r\u0026gt;'^0^ I : P HOITOUaORlk!! . I no J. J-q XI3 590 (nftipo'-i-i -A 'Ti/\nipo-i'H HflAO sr!?- .ejxvias ns T ta I: X ri 3HA3 jTismno'tx vnti biis . 3gfi J 9po3 3op.iri(j bi!\u0026gt;. !:\u0026gt; I x d r\u0026gt; 9jjw-1 ijijri 7 i \u0026amp;i'\nr'!c\u0026gt;+ni ri\u0026amp; isb3o STu^nx ot in as? b fife  3 \u0026amp; aA 3bxvoiq I znsiTn-io'i 4 S.iaiT! ul 2sxt xnjjJ loqqq I n jn .tnsbnsqsbnx bos quo-e n.tc-d . Xsxnoa to. gpctsTi abii'j fs S'- tl oj- s-spfi .J-ns-'isttib to I s b s 'i).''t ,-j \\i ' J- e i'4stbi.x.\u0026gt;l.:i nX bSVJOxri..\nssox vo'-iq smopsd s api st nifim J SV .,y-tstB'a b(ia esboi onx . esx 4 xri4jd-ioqqc svx\niTifc-irJ'... 'iq scl S3.f..i-1'^ si.\") fi a3.j bn\u0026amp; . : iKnaxJ\u0026amp;s-iqs^ S.(so8 l!iS-ip.~J-)S Q I* o Qnxwgllot Slid ovsxriq?:- ot .egviita tsda fnanpo-i*^' 3\u0026gt;1AO srlT :aXsop tana, slotsd adnsbuda 101 .tnsi'nno'^.xvn\"' sta.a sbxvoiq a:J - I siio.xdssT 39-1 bnfe S'\u0026lt; X j6S\"13 to Yd'3 iiav qo/svsb tans as'x Isamsrid xuods bopp isst H loorioxi staxw 6 isdtfe istirj od , .as'xd xvxdoe- .all .h-de Xsxpoa iaort.oa b36(/i{p.:J nai b I X d 3 q I sd od-. asbudxdda bns aq cd.anaxd-s X S'l svld xapq :ix dfwaip spa-dijoona od- . .iij.^.i.iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii|i mil III II ..-iL_iL.LII.I.II. Jinn, III II |i I.iiiiiilll|^|^ . n.im 1 iiiimnriioiiMnGTjiOT I I4 II. PERSONNEL POLICIES A, Employee Qualification The following minimum qualifications are required of CARE Program site staff members: 1. High school diplofpa or GFiD and background of successful, practical experience in groups of children. working with Genuine 1 ove and respect for young children and strong motivation to work with them. Pleasant personality. 4. Minimum age of 13 years. 5. Understands the positive approach to discipline and student behavior management. Willing to learn the policies and procedures of the CARE Program and the Little Rock School District. 7. Desire to work within school philosophy. the framework of a specific 8. Willing to share any special talents and interests with the children. B. Organizational Relationships CARE staff members are employees of the Little Rock School District and: Work under the supervision of the Supervisor of the CARE Program. Work under the cooperating supervision of the building principal. C. Selection of Personnel 6. 1. 1. All applicants for CARE positions must complete and submit a written application form to the Supervisor who will review forms. interview qualified persons. and recommend applicants for employment. Three personal reference and information regarding the application previous employment are required on form. References and previous employment will be checked by telephone or written reference form.5 4 . 5. D. All employee information will be filed in a confidential permanent personnel record maintained in the LRSD Personnel Office. Applicants recommended for employment must be approved by the LRSD Board of Education. Each employee will receive a contract showing salary, contract length. and other pertinent information. Performance Responsibilities of Site Staff 1. Site staff are responsible for planning and implementation of the daily program. a. Plan and implement a weekly schedule of developmentally appropriate experiences for the school-age children attending CARE. 4. 5. b. c . Provide supervision and leadership in a positive manner to children engaged in CARE activities. Participate in activities with children, encouraging them to become increasingly responsible for their behavior and choice of activities. Follow procedures in safeguarding the health and safety of children at all times and in handling emergency situations. Organize and maintain all CARE equipment, and space\nsupplies, order additional material as needed. Communicate appropriate information to parents. teachers, principal, cafeteria manager. and supervisor/coordinator concerning the children and program. (Lead) Perform the administrative functions of the programs a. Complete the time sheet each day and mail to CARE office in time for preparation of payroll. b. Complete and mail all reports and forms to CARE Office when requested (bi-weekly payroll sheets, monthly student attendance, orders, etc.) supply inventory and Di tributer notices to parents as requested by CARE Office staff. d . Keep accurate records of each student's attendancee f . 9- in the roll book and mail the CARE Main tain business cl 6 copy of attendance Office at the end of each month. record of current addresses, phone numbers, numbers for each child. to home and and emergency telephone Provide cafeteria manager with information regarding number of children eating breakfast each day\nupdate afternoon snack count based on number of children attending. Follow instructions for drop-in procedures section D. average p. 14 E. Staff Training and Support CARE employees are required to attend 10 hours of in-service training yearly to increase skills and learn about creative and enrichment activities. The following staff support and training will be provided: 1. Orientation session before school begins each fal 1 . Periodic workshops and resource materials on developmentally appropriate experiences for school-age children. Frequent personal contact with CARE coordinator and supervisor. F . B. 4. Annual written evaluation of performance with continuous oversight and positive suggestions for improvement. Licensing Requirements 1. Annual skin test for tuberculosis is required by Arkansas day care licensing regulations. Ten hours of in-service training or outside workshop attendance regarding child care practices are required each year and will be documented in personnel records. Conditions of Employment 1. For the first year of continuous employment, persons shall be employed on a probationary basis and may be discharged at any time'they are not needed or when their work. unsatisfactory. IS After employees have worked for one year and been4 . 7 contracted for the second year, permanent emp1oyees \u0026gt; they shall become Job performance will be evaluated annually in writinig by the CARE Supervisor- A recommendation will be made for continued employment, dismissal , or reassignment of the employee. Employees will be assigned by the Supervisor to a specific CARE site on the basis of the number of full-time participants and the needs of the program. 5. Permanent employees may be discharged for inefficiency, repeated absence or late arrival on the job, for conduct unbecoming an employee of the LRSD, or other reasons believed to be detrimental to the best interests of the program. A. Permanent employees may be laid off due to a lack of work or financial circumstances of the program. An employee desiring to terminate employment should submit a written resignation at least two S. weeks in advance. Additional regulations regarding termination and due process for permanent employees can be found in the LRSD \"Non-Organized Support Staff Employee Handbook\" available in the LRSD Office of Human Resources and school offices. H. Terminations and Due Process for Permanent Employees In order to maintain a good working environment, all employees are expected to conform to reasonable standards of performance and conduct. When an employee demonstrates an inability or unwillingness to maintain these standards, the supervisor will take necessary corrective action. This action is directed toward resolving personal and work-related problems which interfere with the employee's effectiveness. When all reasonable efforts to correct employee deficiencies are exhausted, it is necessary that this person be terminated. There are occasions when persons, because of the nature of their misconduct, recommended for immediate termination. must be suspended and 1. Following are examples of offenses for which an employee will be recommended for immediate termination. These offenses may include. but arenot 1imited to: cl n Lonvic tion, felony or m.i a t a t. r i a 1 court 8 level, of I s demeanor which is manifestly inconsistent with the safe and efficient operation of CARE. C. F i g fl t i. n g , threaten ing, bodily injury to an Bodily injury an or attempting to do employee or student. means physical pain, illness 9 or impairment of physical condition. Carrying weapons. A weapon is any object that could cause injury to another person and is not. required to be in the possession of the employee in the normal course of the job. d. Stealing or misappropriation of property of employees of the LRSD. e f . 9  Malicious mischief\nthe abuse, misuse, or deliberate destruction or damaging of property, tools, or employees of the LRSD. equipment of other Altering or tampering with time sheets, sign in/out rosters, or other reporting documents relative to attendance, promptness, departure. or Drinking alcoholic beverages on the job during working hours\nintroduction of, any alcoholic or the possession beverage or of , on or LRSD property at any time. This also includes reporting alcohol. to work while under the influence of h. Use of narcotics and/or the use, possession. or transmitting on school premises of drugs or substances capable of modifying mood and/or behavior. i . Insubordination, including refusal or failure to perform work assigned and/or refusal to obey orders of supervisors. k. Disorder1y, disruptive, school premises. The making of or or ma1ic ious or immoral conduct on publishing of false. vicious, tatements concerning employees j . of the LRSD. 1 . Falsification of personnel or other officialm, n. o. 9 school or insurance records, or making false statements when applying for employment. Falsifying or refusing to give testimony concerning incidents which are being investigated. Harboring a disease which, through carelessness, may endanger .the health of fellow workers. Failure to observe or purposefully disregarding school district or CARE Program policies or procedures. I , Grievances 1. Employees have the right to present grievance and shall be assured of freedom from restraint, interference, discrimination, and reprisal. Employees are encouraged to pursue an informal approach through their immediate supervisor to resolve a grievance. result in a satisfactory solution Should this approach not J the employee should then follow the Grievance Procedure as outlined in the \"Non-Organized Support Staff Employee Handbook available in the LRSD Office of Human Resources. J . Compensation 1. The CARE Program salary schedule is based on job responsibilities and years of experience. Each employee will receive a contract indicating a specific school assignment and salary level. Overtime work shall be avoided insofar as is possible, but may be required in the interest of efficient and safe operation. Overtime hours causing a LRSD employee to work more than' 40 hours in a regular work, week will be paid at the current overtime rate. K. Hours o'f Work Hours of worker shall be determined by the supervisor and shall be designed to facilitate the most efficient operation o'f the CARE Program on a self-supporting basis. Before-school assignments will be for 1 or 2 hours and after-school assignments will be for no more 3-1/4 hours depending upon the specific school site and program needs.L. Fringe Benefits 10 1 . Permanent CARE Program employees who are regularly employed in the LRSD for- 25 hours or more per week are eligible to receive LRSD employee benefits (health, life, dentcal , and disability insurance) . providing they have worked in the position for one year. Enrollment procedures and information concerning the various policies can in the \"Non-Organized Support Staff Employee Handbook available in the LRSD Office of Human Resources. M. Service Records A service record is maintained in the LRSD Office of Human Resources for every employee and contains all information pertinent to employment. N. Change of Address Any change of address or telephone number must be reported to the CARE and Human Resources Offices. O. Guidelines for Site Staff 1. BE ON TIME! If you are sick or an emergency arises, call the supervisor to arrange for a substitute. ARRIVING LATE FOR WORK, AND THEREBY LEAVING CHILDREN UNSUPERVISED, IS GROUNDS FOR TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT. NEVER leave a child or a group of children unsupervised even for a brief time period. Always tell a co-worker if you must leave a group of children briefly. Make sure another person will be temporarily supervising your children. 4, Eat and drink only with the children. 5. Constant and effective supervision of the children is required. while supervising Sitting or standing in one location activities is not a safe or acceptable practice. must move around the area, To effectively supervise, you continuously scan the 6. group, by an adult. and make sure every child is being observed The school telephone may not be used for personal calls during CARE, It may be used only for emergency purposes related to the children or to contact the CARE Office.8. 9, 10. 11. 13. 14. 11 Always handle yourself in a professional manner when dealing with children, parents, and school staff. YOU are a representative of the LRSD! Use good language and correct. English in the presence of the children. Never use paddling. or physical punishment (spanking. sarcastic pinching, hitting, poking, etc.), verbal threats. remarks in CARE. Know what children are capable of at each age level. Hold them to a standard they are capable of achieving. Respect individual differences. Everything should have a special place in the CARE area. Help children learn to return each thing to its place. Care area must be kept clean. Show affection to all children alike\nwith respect. hurt feelings. treat them Never say anything that might cause Children need to experience success most of the time. Guide them appropriately\nplan for success! Dress appropriately for your job in clothes that look neat and clean. are safe for interacting with the children on the playground. and are comfortable in the heat or cold. Remember, all schools have rules for the appearance of their staff. If shorts are worn in very hot weather. the shorts must be \"long\" (no shorter than \" above the knee) and loose fitting.12 I1314 H  Office Cheek I n CARE Program staff members are arrival to check the CARE mail box for messages. required upon This lets the CARE B. C. D. E. teacher receive daily. reports and messages from the CARE office Payroll Time Sheets staff attendance will be mailed A time sheet for recording i.,._= of the time period and will be The lead staff person should record to each school in advane kept in the cabinet. the a.m./p.m. attendance of each person on a daily basis. do not include time Record only time actually worked\nmissed due to arriving late or leaving before the end of the CARE day. At the end of the payroll period, each the time sheet and verify the accuracy to arriving late or person should sign The amount of the payroll checks will of their hours. based on these hours records. Daily Attendance in be and the CARE Office substitute Roll Books\nAttendance records on each child are required for both a.m. and p.m. participation. Specific instructions for recording attendance are of the roll book. Tuition Fees\nlocated on the inside front cover the Parent Handbook are Monthly tuition charges listed in full on the 15th of the preceding month. due in The fee must be paid before the child may continue participation in the program on the 1st of the month. Please call the CARE Office (uncertain about whether a child shoulcT^e'^Tdwfed to continue attending. .1st program is supported completely by parent fees, fees must be paid in advance at the CARE Office. and long days are prepaid, parents purchase drop-in The and the Drop-in or Care teachers will long day cards in the CARE office. record all drop-ins according to instructions and will long day card to equal the value of that punch parent's day. Parents must sign a drop-in or long day attendance form Late Fees\nThe CARE Program concludes at 5 0 p.m. each day (6\n00 at Incentive Schools). the late charge for arriving after closing time late) and an is $ .50 for arriving by 5 5 (1-5 minutes additional $1.00 for each additional five minute period. This charge must be paid directly to the CARE teacher upon picking up the child. Since CAREF. B. H. I . employees and af ter work , school custodian CARE reserves the program when Field Trips\nparents are According to LRSD policy. is required away 15 have other obligations the right to remove a child from late over three times. a signed parent permission form for each child for any trip, from the school. When a field trip copies of this permission form should be the CARE Office and completed in advance Parents should be notified in writing of by foot or car, is planned, requested from b'y the parents, the destination of the field trip and the time of departure and return. In addition, the school secretary and the CARE Office should be advised of your plans. LRSD buses are usually unavailable in the afternoon for CARE Program field trips. possibility of transportation. If you should wish to check the complete the field trip form and mail it to the CARE Office at least three weeks in advance of the field trip date. Parent Sign-Out Sheets\nOn regular school days children come directly from their class to the CARE area. Each parent should be asked to sign his/her name on the computerized Sign-Out Sheet upon picking up a child. It is important to make sure that each child is dismissed only to the parent, specified on the registration card, permission from the parent. On holidays or Teacher Workdays, both sign person or person with written parents are expected to in and out, providing the CARE staff with an emergency telephone number for the day. Inj uries and Accidents\nRecord the occurrence of bumps. received by children in CARE in sc rapes, and scratches the spiral bound injury log. This is to provide information about the injury and its treatment should it be needed at a the instructions on Report more serious later date. Fol low the inside cover of the injury log. injuries to the Supervisor and send her a completed accident form, CARE staff. signed by both parent and Medications CARE staff are to follow the procedures of LRSD Health Services Department regarding medication to be given to chiIdren. On regular school days medicine is given only by the school nurse or principal.16 J . K. L. On long days in CARE, CAKE staff may (jive medicine provided the parent brinijs with directions Keep the in a n d medic\nine in locked cabinet. it in the prescription bottle completes a written permission form, the school office or on a high shelf Inventory and Supply Requests\nAn annual inventory should be completed for each CARE site in the spring. This will indicate which materials need to be replenished before the beginning of school To request supplies or proj ec t, call or send a request in August. items needed for a specific craft Food Service Requirements\nBreakfast\nby our children. CARE is charged for You are asked for the Cafeteria Manager, to the CARE Office. every breakfast consumed to fill out a daily form children eating breakfast that day. indicating the number of Please be accurate, since we will be billed for these breakfasts. Sn ac k\nafternoon The Cafeteria Manager will prepare and leave the nack for CARE based on the number of children and staff regularly attending. Please monitor the leftover snacks carefully and reduce the snack, count when your enrollment or attendance declines. expenses within the budgeted amount, To keep food we have to monitor our snack costs closely and not waste money. Leftover Food\nIf there is extra food, you may divide it among children wanting a second serving. Put remaining food in trash can and return uncut fresh fruit on tray to the kitchen. Do not take left, over food home. The Cafeteria Manager will use several forms each day to exchange information with you. Fill them in daily and leave them on the tray. Use the comments section to adjust the snack number and communicate concerns. Food Not Left\nIf you are unable to find the afternoon snack, call the cafeteria manager at home to see if the snack was prepared. If find it or come to school to locate it, emergency peanut butter and crackers. he is unable to tell you where to you may serve your Let the CARE Office know to send you more emergency food the next day. Buildinq Pass\nA child requesting permission to return to the building to use the restroom must take a CARE \"building pass\". This pass must be returned to the same adult. ' Observe closely the length of time the child is in the building. If the child is away from the playground or CARE area for more than 3 or 4 minutes. an adult needs to check on the child.17 M. Confidentiality\nAlways maintain confidentiality about information related to CARE children. Do not discuss a child or provide written information about him to persons other than his parents or per ons needing the specific information to care for the child. Do not discuss or .give information about a child to the parents of another child. This also includes late charge forms. emergency cards, roll book, and communications from parents or our office. Any requests from other than CARE or school office staff should be referred to the Supervisor. N. Suspected Child Abuse or Neglect: 0. A CARE employee who suspects a child's physical or mental health and/or welfare may be adversely affected by abuse or neglect., shall report these concerns to the school principal. The principal will then contact SCAN. staff is unable to report to the school principal, If CARE she should contact the CARE Supervisor who will contact the appropriate authorities for an investigation. Fire Dri11, Tornado Drill, and Earthquake Drill\nFIRE DRILLS MUST BE HELD MONTHLY! 1. Assign a student to be line leader, if necessary. Announce fire drill in a loud, clear voice. Have the children walk quickly and quietly in a single file to the designated area on the playground. If possible, one adult should be at the front of the line and one at the back. 4. The last adult in line should make sure that all children are out of the building, including restrooms. 5. Take the roll book with you. and check, to make sure every child is out of the building. 6. After accounting for every child, return to the building in an orderly and controlled manner. 7 . Practice and discuss this procedure with your children every month and on all long days in CARE. TORNADO DRILL: Practice monthly Follow steps in fire drill procedure, except go to area in the building specified by the principal. Children shouldface the wall, h?ads to protec t Do riot pract.ice kneel, and place drills on the procedures .18 the.ir arms over the.ir from falling debris. Avoid window areas. fire drill, same day because in the event of tornado drill, and earthquake chiIdren may be confused on a rea 1 emergency. EARTHQUAKE DRILL\nPractice Monthly Be prepared to anticipate and avoid dangers, the following procedures. Prac tice INSIDE\n1. Move away from windows. heavy objects that can fall. brick wal1, shelves and Take cover under table, desk or counter. cover head with elbows clasp hands firmly behind neck. If notebooks or jackets are handy hold over head for added protection from flying debris and glass. Evacuate area as soon as possible away from the building as far as possible and away from power 1ines. OUTSIDE\n1. On playground, move to an open space, away from buildings and overhead power lines. Lie down or crouch close to the ground. looking around for danger movement. that may demand Keep) Remain down until shaking stops! Emergency drill procedures MUST be conducted according to the following schedule. 1. FIRE DRILL First Monday of each month. TORNADO DRILL Second Monday of each month. EARTHQUAKE DRILL Third Monday of each month.19H . TAFF arrival 1. Arrival T imes s_ All CARE Program substitute hould arrive in 20 staff members the CARE area c\\n d 15 minutes before school dismissal. Office Check-In\nCARE mail box in The lead staff member should check the school office to pick up the the mail and for the day (may messages about absences or bookkeeping include supplies or messages procedures). Before the children arrive, Site Check and Set-U\u0026amp;j- staff should complete the following steps: the a. Set up all administrative supplies for book, sign-out form, parent handouts). the day (roll Be organized! b. Set up snack and activity supplies for the day. c . Conduct a d . NOTE\nI B. I I I I to be utilized brief site check of the area cafeteria or gym). by CARE (restrooms, playground. Prepare for the arrival of the children. CARE staff should not disturb any on-going classes. All staff are school personnel or reminded that traffic congestion urrounds every school at dismissal time. inside the CARE area Staff should arrange to arrive time. Strictly follow all regulations regarding patrol guards, and parking Strictly follow traffic flow. areas. on CHECK-IN OF CHILDREN 1. Arrival of Children\nAll children should report to the dismissal from their classroom. CARE area immediately upon During the first week, of school, CARE staff should use list and meet the kindergarten children door. In larger programs, kindergartners met in their wing o* hiiilriino all vear by a CARE staff member. the first week, of school. at their classroom In larger programs. f the building all year by a . Storage of Children's Belgnginas a. b. c . are Each child's personal belongings designated place bookbag or backpack in stool, cubby. locker, a bin ) . Staff should assist children in belongings. After children's belongings should not should be stored in a (cafeteria storing their are stored. the children return to the storage area Without staff approval and supervision.21 C. Roll Call a. b. c. d. e. f . All children must tae seated during roll call. Roll call must be conducted by the CARE staff, usually the lead staff member. Every child must be accounted for within the first 15 minutes after school dismissal (present in CARE, from school today, dismissed early, etc . ) absent When a child does not arrive in CARE as scheduled and cannot be accounted for at the school, the following steps should be taken: 1. 4. Check, with school secretary and teacher to see if the child was absent or dismissed early. Call to inform parent of child's absence in CARE and ask for information concerning the child. Notify the school principal and search the school and school grounds for the missing child. Discontinue the search and inform the parent. principal, located. and CARE Office that the child cannot be When a child not enrolled in CARE arrive on the site, follow these steps: 1. Call the CARE Office for any information. If the child has not been enrolled in CARE, return the child to the school office immediately. Following roll call, daily announcements should be made regarding activities for the day, and rules/procedures that need review. special events. SNACK time The afternoon snack will be left by the cafeteria staff. usually in the refrigerator in or near the kitchen. Fol low these steps for serving snack\n1 . Children should be taken to wash their hands. Upon returning, children should be seated during the serving and eating of snack. All staff should wash their hands before serving snack and use the rubber glove provided on tray.Snack cause should be served the in an efficient manner that does not 1 4 . D. E. F. children to wi^it for a long pt- methods are ef fective s children arrive, use \"iod  Sever 1 put snacks sn ac k. he 1 per s out on to pass table before snack out, or have children walk in table. All children a 1 ine to pick u p snack from cart or should remain seated until snack is finished CARE staff should supervise the clean-up after snacks, helping the children as needed. a. b. c . d . ' NOTE\n6. Have children dispose of uneaten food and paper. Examine paper the floor and clean any spills with broom or towe1s. Wipe tables. Return tray to kitchen. for small group Snack, time is a quiet time should never participate in conversations. Children or move physical activities around the room while eating. ACTIVE PLAY TIME is required every day... Outside play\nraining, below freezing or it is Unless the temperature is should be outside each afternoon for such as the children active play. Four Square, Include both free play and group games. kickbal1, basketba11, etc . Active Play for Bad Weather\nUse the \"Indoor/Outdoor Game Book\" inside in bad weather. for active games to play Use the You may also include group exercising, War Ball, and beachball volleyball. on paper plates to music. \"iceskating\" ... Be creative and in control. include a daily be creative, and be varied. Avoid limiting the activity to crayons or markers and paper day after day. ACTIVITY TIME should be planned in advance, opportunity to be creative, and be varied. or Use aciivi c y LU L.I oy -------------   ' x and weekly and seasonal themes, pecxal_xn-cabinet children, and ideas from your art. resource book, in FREE PLAY should be included in the daily schedule for a specific time. Children should be closely supervised and provided with adequate and varied game Children s/toys/art materials. SIGNOUT 1. Each child must be signed out by a parent/guardian or person listed on tudent registration form or person authorized in writing by parent. to you to show their It is good to require a person not. known driver's 1icense. If an unauthorized person comes to pick, up a child, dismiss the child to them unless you can contact a do not parent to4. H. get verbal permission, identity. Check the driver's license to verify Children authorized by a parent, to leave CARE and walk home or go to a class should have written permission days/time and sign themselves out. Distribute indicating communications from the CARE Office to parents as These communications should be kept they sign out, confidential and may include memos and financial statements. NOTE\nA child may never be checked out by an unauthorized person or allowed to leave on his own without permission from parent. CLOSE DONN AND STAFF DEPARTURE 1. Site Close Downs following steps should be followed: During the last 15 minutes of the day, the a. Return all equipment and supplies neatly to the cabinet. b. Make a final check of areas used by CARE to be sure materials are secured in cabinet, toilets have been flushed. area is clean, and Staff Departure Time a . One staff (Tiember must remain until last child has been picked up, even if parent arrives after closing time. Parent may be charged late fee for arriving past closing b. time. other staff time. hoLild work until their assigned closing c Staff will be paid for working assigned hours. If staff members leave early on any day, they will be paid only for time actually worked. iiM2425V nfSCIPLINE A. Phi 1 ospphv of sc ipline Plan The discipline policy of the CARt rrogram is based on th_ belief that each child is for his own Discipline in CARE should focus teaching, positive reinforcement, rather than punishment, are taught the standards of behavior expected in for misbehavior. of the CARE Program responsible behavior. in CARE on learning, and reinforcement, taught the standards Children CARE and the consequences to handle stressful or They are encouraged to find an acceptable way and to learn from mistakes. difficult situations activity is used to give the child time Time out from group to calm down. reflect on his behavior, consider the consequences, and evaluate alternatives. CARE staff are expected to request parents help with behavior problems that cannot be solved by time out. the right to suspend a We also reserve the right to suspeiiu . child from CARE for a designated amount of time, or to expel a child from the program for an indefinite period of time. or an if all positive i 1 UI U y I CT n I I -u-r. ------- . efforts are made and the child cannot conform required behavior. to the and hitting) of any .child_is Corporal punishment (spankinq never allowed in the CARE Proqram under any------- Threatening, hitting, or spanking a child are immediate suspension and recommendation for termination of employment in the LRSD. Only the means of discipline Ixste ^the CARE discipline plan (time out, behavior documents) permitted in controlling student behavior in CARE. If have followed this plan and a child's behavior continues allowed in circumstances. or and recommendation the LRSD. in the CARE discipline pian (time out, are CARE, you have followed this plan and a child's behavior to be disruptive, you need to request assistance.  ' to redirection t_ children will respond positively activity, discussion of the problem behavior, generous praise for efforts to improve. discussion praise for The aim of discipline is The aim of punishment is NOTICE THE DIFFERENCE! to another time out, and to help children build good habits, to break the child of a bad habit.Il B. Discipline Plan for CARE Program Behavior rules for students! 1. Follow directions of CARE teachers. No cursing, teasing, or 4. 5, 6. Show respect to others\nof all students. Return all materials to Keep hands, threatening. respect the rights and property their proper place. feet and objects to self. Leave assigned area with permission only. Positive consequences may include\nVerbal praise and immediate feedback Positive comments to parents Sood citizen display or individual recognition Ribbons, treats Special group activities, proj ec ts, rewards Negative consequences for breaking the CARE rules\nLevel 1\nFor the first infraction an individual conference between student and staff will be held to discuss the child's behavior, from group activities. Child may receive time out Level Behavioral document or note to parent to be signed and returned. Child will lose a play or recreational privilege in CARE for 1-2 days. Level Second behavioral document to parent. Conference between student, parent, and staff required to discuss behavior. Child will lose a play or recreational privilege in CARE for 3-5 days. Level 4\nShort term suspension of 35 days from CARE, refund of money paid for these days. No Level 5\nExpulsion from CARE Program, paid for remainder of month. No refund of money Severe Clause\nendangers the safety of others, suspended from the CARE Program, between parent and staff. If a student is severely disruptive or he/she will be immediately pending a conference Note\nCorporal punishment (paddling) will not be used in disciplining children in the CARE Program.28 C. (3 u i d alines f o r S t a f f .1 . Consistency of discipline is more important than severity. 2. Any penalty imposed should be the natural outcome of the For example^ if a child gets out of hand while misbehavior, I ----, playing Connect Four, he should be removed from the game to area and allowed back when ready to behave he s another appropriately. Correction misbehavior should be made as close to the time of the as possible and with the child s full understanding of why it. is imposed. 4. State expectations for child's behavior in positive terms, what the child can't do breeds rebellion. Emphasis on resentment, and feelings of frustration. as \"no\", \"don't do that\", etc., emphasizes the negative and rather than what Using words such 6, 7. 8. \"no\" , \"don't do that\", teaches the child what should not be done, he should do. Good discipline allows the child to feel that his side of the case has been heard, that his point of view is understood. administering Good discipline also requires that the person it understand what caused the misbehavior and remove the causes if possible. People are always more cooperative if they feel liked. When a child is frustrated, help him accepted and relaxed, understand his feelings and find appropriate ways PUNISHMENT JUST ADDS TO THE CHILD'S with these feelings. FRUSTRATION. to deal Correction of a child should never be made out of a feeling of anger or on a personal basi evident when we say help with snack. Punitive feelings are she doesn't deserve to play a game. etc. \" or \"if he does this to me, then I will do that to her. around.\" for She can't get away with that while I'm Likewise, good behavior should never be bargained Praise for - \"I'll give you a present if you are good.\" than punishment or good behavior is much stronger motivation bribes. Time out from group activities allows the child to consider his unacceptable behavior and how he could have better handled the situation to stay within Total isolation is not necessary or appropriate. Time out should be limited to three to five minutes for less serious the CARE rules. more than five to ten minutes for more offenses and no -- _ offenses (actions that might cause harm to another serious person).29 D. How to Communicate with CARE Children CARE staff should realize the importance of communication in relation to guidance. The fallowing suggestions will be helpful as you work with the children and try to guide them toward acceptable behavior. 1. RECOGNIZE THAT GOOD COMMUNICATION IS.THE KEY TO GETTING COOPERATION. A conscious effort must be made to learn to communicate effectively with children. ACCEPT THE CHILD'S NEED TO CONTROL YET EXPRESS HIS ANGER, natural. One must help children learn that anger is It i feelings in outward. healthy and wise to express these acceptable ways instead of keeping them pent up. being destructive, or hurting others. LEARN TO LISTEN WITHOUT PRECONCEIVED OPINIONS IN ORDER TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS BEING SAID. Hear the children out completely. Listen to them from their points of view in order to avoid short-circuiting the lines of communication. 4. STAY TUNED IN WITH THE RIGHT TONE OF VOICE. Sarcasm, preaching, and unpleasant tones of voice turn off communication. LEARN TO SPEAK TO THE CHILD'S FEELING, NOT TO THE WORDS. Strive always to decode the underlying message. He 1 p the child find his own answers by asking questions in return. 6. KEEP PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION CONFIDENTIAL. Do not 7. E. laugh at or belittle the child. Do not discuss the child's concerns with others. LEARN FROM MISTAKES. ALL OVER AGAIN. LEARN TO LAUGH, LOVE, AND BEGIN Handling Common Behavior Problems\nChild is angry Causes: Being told \"no\", \"stop\", or \"don't too often. Prevented from doing something he wanted to do. Demands beyond child's achievement level. Do Not: Become angry yourself. Do: Use time out to calm the child. Try to reason or talk with him after he is calm.0 Ch_i l_d_ Causes\nTreated unfairly or another child. New baby in family. Peer Pressure. Lin f a i r comparison made to Do Not\nShame him. Do: Try to help child improve his self-image. Help him express his feelings. Chi Id demands attention Causes: Is bored. Feels left out, insecure. Do Not\nRidicule or shame. Ignore or isolate. Scold or punish. Do: Try to help child improve his self-image. Help him express his feelings. I I Child uses bad language Causes\nTrying to get attention. Imitating others. Letting off steam I I 1 Do Not: Do\nBet exited or Make an show shock or embarrassment. issue of it. Calmly tell child to stop. Suggest substitutes for the word. healthy outlet for his feelings. Offer Child is destructive Causes: Feels jealous, bored. Wants attention. Desires excitement. Do Not: Tell him he is bad or preach at him. Sco1d, yel1, or shout. Punish, spank, or hit him. Do: Provide an adequate space for wear and tear on equipment. play and expect some Substitute something else destroyed. Provide things to pound. for cut., what is being and tear.Child won't share Causes: Do Not: Do: 31 Needs experience in owning and sharing. Snatch things away from him. Scold him or tell him you do not like him. Be fair in settling children's arguments over things. As much as possible let children settle their own arguments. Child hurts other children Causes\nIs troubled or angry about something. Do Not\nPunish or hurt him. Make him feel Act angry. II bad\" . Insist that child apologize. Do: Quietly separate the children. Divert his attention and take away the hurting object, calmly and firmly. Teach him there are some things we do not do. Help child to feel good about himself. Ask that he try to be more tolerant in the future. Child does not tell the truth Causes: Fear of punishment. Likes to exaggerate, Is seeking attention. imitate. Do Not\nPunish or shame or reject. Make him apologize. Do\nProvide him with opportunities for enriching his imagination. Help him discover the difference between fact and fantasy. Tell him the truth. Give positive strokes when he tells the truth under stress.'I l ! I I I J'\u0026lt;4 VI . PROGRAMMING WITH CHILDREN A. Ac tivities The CARE Program much more than babysitting. 11 is a B. school-age child care program of activities that are: '* Planned! Every day has a written plan. * Exciting and fun. * Varied, not the same thing day after day. * Developmental - ones that challenge children to grow, ones learn and try new things. where staff can interact * Done in a small group with children. not just supervise. To help you plan the program for your CARE site, the CARE ideas for activities supervisor and coordinator will provide and games on a monthly. addition, resources in your this section of the staff manual. CARE cabinet include In addition. resources the Indoor/Outdoor Games Book, LRSD Recreation manual and the Art Book. theme for a Activities can be organized around a specific (Me, Friends, Fall, Thanksgiving, Space, etc.) OR around a special event (September week or a month, Insects, Birds, Thanksgiving, birthdays. Circus Day, Have fun! etc.). Keep spicing up the program! staff meeting should be held to plan the Every week a --- activities for the next week, and supplies must be ordered Remember to have alternate plans for bad in advance. weather days when outdoor play is not possible. Daily Schedule The CARE day is planned around the following times\nSnack Time\nWhat's after-school play without a snack? Outdoor Time\nActive game and free play to use lots of Indoor Time\nClean-Up Time\nphysical energy. Large group. activities card games. games, This small group, and independent including art, construction housekeeping, is a time table games, materia1s, active d rama, homework, etc . to create 3 learn a new sk ill, and just have fun. Time to mess, play game put away materials, clean up with a *5! mall group, any and have contact with individual parents as they arrive.\u0026gt;? C. J i b' 35 rIME SCHEDULE FOR REGULAR SCHOOL DAYS (f z L. C| I..' \\ 'll , J I i i -I , I !'  J.i rk.'s ! j' I- \\ I .. bJ 9 .-J-bH tfJ V I , ':3.i Slum , snifi,-ib 3S i-.. q.'J fifislb 3sx:f-.ivjr.j bs yti 1 q  \u0026lt;3S'if fa rife .'.I (i-j I. .l-'jj iJ-'lJifiC-J '/ \u0026gt;5 ( 1 rl.'-inul ?t\nJ i JbO , :11OO 'I ' bi'.iiT J 9 ) ).)\u0026lt; \"q .:\u0026lt; Ef i up yj f. vi V '1 9 n.) \"t fc I 1 7 fl 1.H ' . s v ri '(O I- i I f-\"Orl .-t 1.1  10 11 'I ul.i LisJ uO -i^Oi.id V'lod ) esii iv j J uA \u0026gt;S ( . b.i'a ,. \"uds + cjS SQiTiiO' quo-iU .1 i e-inS toH\" H b 'Ub'fi 3d+. no Cl u i e i m\ni b b.iif qu nsbIC 'y t bd Ifi X ,i esd.unim LJ' sidd 3 n f. p'iid c.i , fa J\nlaris. Id fed S 3f-!d tu .d.., Vb.i-fl 1 3(d li.(j.ir. . (13 1.f X r!3 X 1'aqij : pn.t I. .3Ufe J 3V ZIAHHU fed X V X .d fl fe ,E3MAa nx loxi.d Xxidqferl .c- d'.i.iuf:\u0026gt; arid noi. fz: -t dag Ct J fa if* r I rife J C-I f\n-i 3au3M0ii! Qd gdfiboi ud x.n.rpi * I.) i s\n.n.( Ci.d 3 I (life vrj'n\n\u0026gt;\"i\ni  O.rP-. \u0026lt;1-: 3rM *7? ID. TIME SCHEDULE OR I ONG DAY /'HOL .[DAY 5N0w DAY NOTE\nU S ? this C\nl!E?Puli' ai:i\u0026gt; a 51 a r t i i'l g poin t E. 36 cArtcJ cAcipL it tcc* meet the 7!00-B 0 needs of your children. 0 ,0-9:00 9:OO-1O:OO 10:00-1.1. ! 15 1.1:15-12:00 12 s 00-1\n00 1:00-2 30\no 00 00-4\n45 4:45-5 0 ACTIVITY IDEAS Activi ties Arrival of children Independent Activitie games, free play) 15 (card games, board Breakfast and clean up Creative Activity (art project, puppet construction Outside Play Restroom, and use. drama, music, etc. ) lunch and clean up Quiet Time -kindergartners -Others rest or must.  n p ** have quiet activities Choice of creative activity ?\u0026lt; free play Snack\nrestroom Outside Play Small Group Games ?\u0026lt; Activities (story book ?\u0026lt; record, \"Hot Potato\", etc.) Clean up and dismissal should be ready to begin immediately upon the arrival of the children. Staff should use the 15 before school is dismissed to get supplies out of cabinet and ready to use for planned activities. GAMES, minutes the Labeling CREATIVE the tables with removable signs (HOMEWORK, AREA, ART PROJECT, etc.) has proven to be a helpful tool in sure to locate the quiet organizing the CARE area. Be activities away from the ones action. encouraging conversation and The following pages have many ideas for active play and creative projects you will want to include in your CARL session plans.37 F. PRCCEDURES FOR EMFRPFNCY OR INCLEMENT NEITHER CONDI TJCjNS\nPLAN A\nEARLY CLOSINC Subject: When schools are dismissed early due to increasingly 'bad weather, CARE WILL BE IN OPERATION from the time school is dismissed until 5:30 P.M. (6:00 extended day sites). When schools are 0 Time: CARE staff will report at the time school is dismissed and will remain until the last child is picked up (no later than the usual closing time). Parents are urged to pick up their children as soon as announcements are made about hazardous driving conditions, streets that, become dangerous Some of the schools are on and are closed to traffic at an early time. PLAN B\nLRSD SCHOOLS CLOSED Subj ec t\nWhen school is dismissed for the entire day due to bad weather. CARE WILL BE IN OPERATION IN SPECIFIED SCHOOLS from 8s00 A.M. to 5 0 P.M. If CARE has to be closed due to extremely hazardous road conditions, made on radio and TV stations. announcements will be Charge s There is a $7.00 fee for each emergency day to be paid There will be no additional fee upon signing in your child. charged for snow days added to the school calendar in since these days were paid for in a prior month. Child Needs: June, A sack lunch and drink, for the noontime meal. Breakfast and snacks will be provided. Kindergartners and four year olds need to bring a rest mat and time. towels for nap Location\nCARE will be in operation at specified schools. Parents may use any one of these schools. Upon arrival parents must write their name and daytime phone number The CARE office will be closed on these on the signin sheet, days. Special Staff Instructions: Work schedule for days when LRSD schools are closed for emergency or bad weather will be sent to all staff and a copy will be kept at each snow site. When schools are closed early or before school opens for the day this staff schedule goes into effect. ***0FFICIAL ANNOUNCEMENTS ABOUT EARLY DISMISSAL AND/OR CLOSING OF SCHOOLS WILL BE MADE ON KARN RADIO AND TV STATIONS 4, 7, 11***CARE Program CS Little Rock School District CB CARE Program Rockefeller School 700 East 17th St. Little Rock, AR 72206 (501) 324-2395 RECEIVED OCT 2 8 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS Office of Desegregation Monitoring Introduction 1 Program Description 1 Enrolling Your Child Hours and Days of Operation Payment of Fees Payment of Fees (Drop-In) Fee Schedule Multiple Enrollment Within Family Holiday Attendance Late Pickup Charge 4 Returned Checks 4 Extended Absences 4 Parent Communications 4 Release of Children 4 Food Services 4 Inclement Weather Plans 5 Health Forms 5 Student Accident Insurance 5 Illness in CARE 5 Medication 5 Discipline 6 Parties and Special Occasions 6 Appendix As Inclement Weather Procedures...? Appendix Bs CARE Payment Schedule/Calendar . . 8 Appendix C\nDiscipline Plan 9B EH 1 Introduction The CARE Program is a non-profit. self-supporting program of child care provided for elementary-age students and parents of the Little Rock School District. The LRSD Board of Education authorised the development of the program for the 1980-81 school year. Based on a survey of district needs, CARE was initially offered in thirteen primary schools. The program continues to strive to meet the needs of district patrons by offering CARE in elementary schools with a minimum of fifteen participants. The CARE Program provides a continuation of important elements in the child's educational environment: a well-known, comfortable place. with a friendly staff, and other children they already know. The program eliminates parental concerns about children being transported to 'J another location for child care. This manual explains the CARE policies and operational procedures. suggestions. Parents are encouraged and volunteer to share to observe, make their skills and interests with the CARE children. Program Description As a school-age child care service. the CARE Program provides an informal and unique environment for children of different ages to live and learn together. CARE maintains a structured environment to insure order and safety, yet provides children with opportunities to make choices and become involved in both group and independent activities. The program includes a wide range of social, and creative opportunities. recreational, The CARE Program is based on the following goals: -to provide a safe environment for students before and after school, -to offer a wide variety of creative and recreational activities, -to help children feel good about themselves and develop positive attitudes toward school. -to encourage growth in skills. relationships and socialE n r Q11 i. n q Y o u r C h i 1 ci A child may be enrolled in the CARE Program on a \"full-time, drop-in, or part-time ( 1 , 1 3, or 4 days per week) basis. To register a child, return with the $6.00 registration the completed registration form fee to the CARE Program Office, Rockefeller School, 700 E. 17th, Little Rock, AR. 06. The first monthly payment must be made before your child' first day of attendance in CARE. (324-2395) / Hours and Days of Operation Each program operates from 7:00 A.M. from the close of school until 5\no P.M. until school opens and (6:00 at Incentive Schools) on regular school days and FROM 7:00 A.M.-5 50 P.M. on most school holidays. 8:00 A.M.-5\n0 P.M. On \"Snow days, CARE is open from at specified schools. When a school site is closed before the normal dismissal time, CARE begins operation at the earlier time. CARE is closed on all legal holidays and other holidays when the school sites are unavailable for use. Payment of Fees Full-time and part-time tuition payments are due in the CARE Program Office on the 15th of the month (two weeks in advance) and must be paid in full by th first of the month in order for your child to participate in the CARE Program. A $5.00 late payment fee will be charged for payments received after the 1st day of the month, payment schedule. See appendix B for Reservations for holiday CARE and payment of the $7.00 per day fee are due in the CARE office prior to the holiday. No refunds can be made in event your child does not attend on the holiday. Payment of Fees (Drop-In) A drop-in card must be purchased at the CARE office for any regular school day. 3 days in a month. the card each time the child attends. The cost is $4.50 per day not to exceed Care teachers will punch out one day on accepted on holidays. Drops-ins are not. refer to Holiday Care page 3. Fee Schedule Monthly fees for regular school days, not holidays, are averaged over nine advance each month. including equal payments and due in There is an additional $7.00 charge per day for CARE at specified sites on holidays. Mail or deliver payments and Rockefeller School, reservations to the CARE Office 700 East 171 h, Little Rock, at '7 06. Ar. /There will be a $7,00 charge per child for attending CARE on a \"Snow Day.\" your child. Snow Day fees must be paid when you sign in Applications are available for free or reduced rates at Incentive Schools (Franklin, Garland, Rightsei 1, Rockefeller, Stephens,). Ish, Mitchel 1, Eligibility requirements are based on family size and income. The following fees are charged for participation: Categories Fees \"Annual Registration Fee Ful1-time Part-time Part-time Part-time (5 days @ week) (4 days @ week) (3 days @ week) (2 days @ week) Drop-In (up to 3 days @ month) Holiday (reservations required) \"Snow\" Day Late Payment Fee Late Pickup Charges (1-5 minutes) (Each additional 5 minutes) 6.00 69.25 @ month 56.00 @ mon t h 42.00 @ month 28.00 @ month 13.50 @ card 7.00 @ day 7.00 Q day 5.00 @ month .50 daily 1.00 daily Multiple Enrollment t*lithin Family If one family enrolls three or more children in the CARE Program, the charge for the third child and every child thereafter will be one-half the normal rate. to a one-family unit with all children under the guardianship of the parent making payments. This applies Holiday Attendance Parents will be notified in advance of the schools which will be open for CARE from 7:00 A.M.5 Teacher Workdays and school holidays. 30 P.M. during Reservations for child care at one of these schools and payment of the $7.00 fee for each day must be received in the CARE Office by the reservation deadline in order for your child to attend. Hiring of staff and purchasing of food/supplies for the children must be done in advance on the basis of the paid reservations received by this date. issued to parents upon receipt of payment. A long day card will be No refunds can be made in the event your child does not attend CARE on the hoiiday. $ The CARE Program is closed on all legal holidays and other holidays when chool sites are unavailable for use.4 Late Pickup Charge CARE concludes at 5 O P.M. each day. The late charge for arriving after this time is $.50 for arriving 1-5 minutes late and an additional $1.00 for each additional five minute period. This charge must be paid directly to the CARE teacher upon picking up your child. In addition, you will also be charged for any overtime pay required for the school custodian to remain until your arriva1. A record will be kept of the dismissal time for your child. Since CARE employees and school custodians have other obligations after work, the CARE Program reserves the right to remove a child from the program when parents are late over three times. Returned Checks . A $5 service charge will be assessed for all checks returned due to insufficient funds. In the event a check is returned, future payments must be made in cash. money order, or cashier's check. Extended Absences If your child is out of CARE for 5 or more consecutive days. please notify the CARE Office (324-\n95) upon your child's return and request a credit toward your month. fees for the next Parent Communications Please notify the CARE staff (324-:\np5) of any changes in important information relating to your child (telephone numbers, emergency numbers, address, allergies. etc . ) If your child is sick or will be out of town, would appreciate notification. the CARE staff Release of Children A child will be dismissed from CARE only to his/her parents or persons authorised on the registration form to pick up the child. Each child must be signed out with CARE staff on a daily basis before leaving the CARE site. Food Services CARE students are offered breakfast and snack during the hours of operation. The food is prepared by the LRSD Food Services Department and meets the federal breakfast program guidelines, consideration guide1ines. The snack menu given to IS planned by CARE staff with nu t r i t i ona 1 con ten t and cost.5 inclement weather are explained The CARE Program plans for .in Appendix A. When school .is closed due to inclement Appendix A. weather, CARE will be open at. specified schools unless road conditions are extremely hazardous. This decision will be made by the LRSD Superintendent and based on involved for staff and students to reach the school the safety risk building. CARE will be open from 8\noo A.n.-o\nw r. ri. at. specified schools (Refer to Appendix A). In the event CARE is closed, announcements will be made on radio, Channel 4, and local TV stations. There will be a $/.00 8:00 M.-5:30 P.M. and stations. Cab 1 e This charge per child for attending CARE on a \"Snow day\". '  Breakfast and fee is to be paid upon signing in your child. snack will be furnished by CARE, and each child should bring a sack, lunch and drink. Four year olds and kindergartners need to bring a rest mat and two towels, pick up your children as soon as possible. We urge you to School days missed due to snow will be added to the CARE calendar, and your child may attend CARE on those days with no additional charge. Health Forms section of the Parents must, complete the health information registration form for each child. The form will be on file at the CARE site and should This form for each child. be kept current. information is extremely important in the event your child needs medical or emergency attention. Student Accident Insurance The LRSD CARE Program cannot assume liability for Parents are encouraged to financial injuries received by students. apply for the low-cost student accident insurance offered each year through the school district. Enrollment forms are available in the school office. Illness in CARE ) ill and unable to participate in CARE If your child becomes _____________ a parent will be requested to pick, up the child. Should the staff be unable to reach parents or guardians. activities, emergency persons listed on child's records will be called. Medication to a child must be authorized by Any medication to be given written statement from the physician and/or parent and a given be in by the the school nurse or principal. original container. All medication must with the child's name, type and date of prescribed medication, dosage. amount, and time ofWhen medication nurse for proper is required, storage, completed by the parent. Discipline it is to be given to the school and a medication sheet must be The CARE Program's discipline plan is outlined in Appendix C. In CARE children are expected to be responsible'for their own behavior and respect the rights of others. Time-out from group activities may be used to encourage a child to calm down and reflect on his/her behavior. Parental help will be requested for behavior problems that cannot be solved by time-out. suspend a child for 3-5 days, We reserve the right to or to expel a child from the program, after appropriate efforts to correct the behavior problems have been made and the child is still unable to conform to the required behavior. A child may be immediately suspended for severely disruptive behavior or endangering the safety of others. Parties and Special Occasions Parties may be held throughout the year on special occasions and holidays, appreciated, Although parental help with parties is parents are under no obligation. Parties are organized entirely on a volunteer basis. Arrangements for parties and special celebrations may be made through the CARE staff.7 Appendix A CARE Program INCLEMENT WEATHER PROCEDURES Plan A\nSubj ect: When schools are dismissed early due to increasingly bad weather, CARE WILL BE IN OPERATION from the time school is dismissed until T ime: Plan B\n5 \u0026lt;) P.M. Staff will report to CARE at the time school is dismissed. We urge you to pick up your children as soon as announcements are made about hazardous driving conditions, since some of the schools are on streets that become dangerous and are blocked to traffic at an early time. Subj ect: When school is dismissed for the entire day due to bad weather, CARE WILL BE IN OPERATION in selected schools. We urge you to make early pick ups. Time: 8:00 A.M. to 5\no P.M. Charge: $7.00 fee to be paid upon signing in your child. Bring : Sack lunch and a drink for noontime meal. Rest mat ?\u0026lt; two towels for 4 year olds ?\u0026lt; Kinder gartners. (Breakfast ?\u0026lt; snack furnished by CARE) Location: CARE will be open at the following schools which are the most accessible during ice and snow\nBrady Chicot Forest Park Gibbs Magnet 7915 W. Markham (near Mississippi) moo Chicot Rd. 1600 North Tyler (off Cantrell) 1115 W. 16th (near Chester) You may take your child to any of these schools. bring your child each morning, When you telephone number on the sign-in sheet. write your name and daytime This procedure will enable the CARE staff to contact you in an emergency. CARE has to be closed due to extremely hazardous road If conditions, announcements will be made on. Cable Channel 4, local radio and TV stations. ** OFF IC I AL ANNOUNCEMENTS ABOUT EARLY DISMISSAL ?\u0026lt; CLOSING OF SCHOOLS WILL BE MADE ON RADIO AND TV STATIONS**8 Appendix B CARE Payment Schedule TUITION PAYMENTS ARE DUE ON THE FOLLOWINS DATE: August 15, 1991- September 16, 1991 October 15, 1991 November 15, 1991- December 16, January 15, 1991-- 1992---- February 14, 1992 March 16, 1992--- April 15, 1992 Aug/Sept. Tuition - October Tuition November Tuition December Tuition January Tuition February Tuition March Tuition April Tuition May/June Tuition All payments received ten (10) days after the due date will be accessed a $5.00 late charge. CALENDAR August 26, 1991 September 2, 1991 September 23, 1991 September 30, 1991 October 21, 1991 October 31, 1991 November 1, 1991 November 7-8, 1991 November 28-29, 1991 December 23, 1991 January 6, 1992 January 20, 1992 January 23, 1992 January 24, 1992 March 2, 1992 March 26, 1992 March 27, 1992 March 30-April 3, 1992 May 25, 1992 June 5, 1992 First Day for Students Labor Day (School Closed) Staff Development Day Parent Conference Day Staff Development Day End of First Quarter (45 Days) Work Day (Records Day) AEA (Inservice Days) Thanksgiving Holidays Christmas Vacation Classes Resume Martin L. King Holiday End of Second Quarter (44 Days) Work Day (Records Day) Parent Conference Day End of Third Quarter (43 Days) Work Day (Records Day) Spring Break Memorial Day (School Out) Last Day for Students9 CARE Program Discipline Plan Appendix C Eiehavior rules for students: 1. Follow directions of CARE teachers. No cursing, Show respect to others\nteasing, or threatening. respect the rights and 4. 5. 6. property of all students. Return all materials to their proper place. Keep hands, feet and objects to self. Leave assigned area with permission only. Positive consequences may include: Verbal praise and immediate feedback. Positive comments to parents Good citizen display or individual Ribbons, treats recognition Special group activities. proj ec ts, rewards Negative consequences for breaking the CARE rules\nLevel 1\nFor the first infraction an individual conference between student and staff will be held to discuss the child's behavior. Child may receive time-out from group activities to consider his/her actions. Level Behavioral document or note to parent to be signed and returned. Child may lose a play or recreational privilege in CARE for 1- days. Level Second behavioral document to parent. Conference between student, parent, and staff required to discuss behavior. Child may lose a play or recreational privilege in CARE for 3-5 days. Level 4\nShort term suspension of 3-5 days from CARE, refund of money paid for these days. No Level 5\nExpulsion from CARE Program, paid for remainder of month. No refund of money Severe Clause: endangers the safety of others. If a student is severely disruptive or he/she will be immediately suspended from the CARE Program, pending a conference between parent and staff. Note\nCorporal punishment (paddling) will not be used in disciplining children in the CARE Program.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"auu_auc-047_auc-047-0072","title":"C. Eric Lincoln, circa 1991","collection_id":"auu_auc-047","collection_title":"C. Eric Lincoln Collection","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1991"],"dcterms_description":["C. Eric Lincoln, wearing regalia, stands at a podium and receives a hood in a ceremony."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["C. Eric Lincoln Collection||http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12322/fa:047"],"dcterms_subject":["African American authors","African American scholars","Portraits","Commencement ceremonies","Special events"],"dcterms_title":["C. Eric Lincoln, circa 1991"],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Atlanta University Center Robert W. Woodruff Library"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12322/auc.047:0072"],"dcterms_temporal":["1990/1999"],"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["photographs"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"nge_ngen_m-8749","title":"Charles Weltner","collection_id":"nge_ngen","collection_title":"New Georgia Encyclopedia","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Massachusetts, Suffolk County, Boston, 42.35843, -71.05977"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1991"],"dcterms_description":["Charles Weltner accepts the John F. Kennedy Profile in Courage Award in 1991. An Atlanta native, Weltner served as both a U.S. congressman from Georgia and as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of Georgia. His career was marked by an ardent opposition to segregation during the 1950s.","Photograph of Charles Weltner accepting the John F. Kennedy Profile in Courage Award in 1991. He stands at a large wooden podium and speaks into a microphone. The award sits on the right.","An Atlanta, Georgia native, Weltner served as both a U.S. congressman from Georgia and as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of Georgia. His career was marked by an ardent opposition to segregation during the 1950s."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":null,"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":["http://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/history-archaeology/charles-weltner-1927-1992","Forms part of: New Georgia Encyclopedia"],"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/UND/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["http://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/history-archaeology/charles-weltner-1927-1992","Forms part of: New Georgia Encyclopedia"],"dcterms_subject":["Legislators--United States","Judges--Georgia","Men--Georgia","Civil rights workers--Georgia","Politicians--Georgia","Microphone","John F. Kennedy Library","John F. Kennedy Library. Foundation--Awards","Speeches, addresses, etc., American--Massachusetts--Boston"],"dcterms_title":["Charles Weltner"],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["New Georgia Encyclopedia (Project)"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["https://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/history-archaeology/charles-weltner-1927-1992/m-8749/"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":["Courtesy of John F. Kennedy Library Foundation"],"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["color photographs"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Weltner, Charles Longstreet"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_288","title":"Classroom Teachers Association","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1991/2006"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Parents' and teachers' associations","Teachers","Educational law and legislation"],"dcterms_title":["Classroom Teachers Association"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/288"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nRECEIVED May 5 1991 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION . Filed us. DISTRICT COURT 'TC^M rMO'^Djr-r Ar!L/AM rr-aM ni*?jr.T ^ckansA^ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT No. LR-C-82-86^ fi. E Sy\n----------- MAY 01 1991 PLAINTIFF StNTS, CLEFih i' PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al. INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al. INTERVENORS LITTLE ROCK CLASSROOM TEACHERS ASSOCIATION'S OBJECTIONS TO LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT'SPROPOSED DESEGREGATIONPIJ^N Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association (\"LRCTA\"), one of the Knight. Intervenors, presents the following objections to the May 1, 1991 Litrle Rock School District Desegregation Plan: I. PARTICULAR OBJECTIONS 1. In Volume II, Incentive Schools, page 292, Re: 02267, vs. the Support Programs are described. The Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association (\"LRCTA\") objects to the section of the plan which denies LRCTA the right to negotiate. Pursuant to the Professional Negotiations Agreement, Article II, Subsection A and the Educational Support Personnel (\"ESP\"), Article III, LRCTA is authorized to negotiate \"salaries. teaching conditions. class size, teacher load and other conditions of employment. II Such authorization includes the extra hour(s) of the school day and Office of Desegregation Monitoringextra day of the school year for Incentive School personnel, certified and uncertified. The Little Rock School District imposed the extra hour and the additional pay for Incentive School personnel during 1990-91 school refusing to negotiate despite the demand from LRCTA. Further, LRCTA demands the right to negotiate the stipend for Homework Centers certified personnel and instructional aides described in Volume II, page 292-E, Re\n02268. II. STAFF RECRUITMENT 2. In Volume II, Incentive Schools Staffing, page 318, Re: 02270, LRCTA objects to the lack of clarity in this section calling for staff recruitment with specific experience showing tl a commitment to working in an urban district.\" Will past teaching experience in the Little Rock School District be sufficient evidence of a commitment to working in an urban district? 3. In Volume II, Incentive School Staffing, Section H, Page 322, Re: No. 02296, 02297, LRCTA objects to the denial of the right to appoint members of the committee although LRCTA represents all staff. Pursuant to the Professional Negotiations Agreement, Article XXXV, LRCTA asserts the right to appoint members to this committee as outlined in that section of the PNA for joint committees.Respectfully submitted, MITCHELL and ROACHELL 1014 West Third Street Post Office Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203 01) 378-. By: (da Barr Langford, 89 Attorneys for Knight In' 171 rvenors L CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On May 1, 1991, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was mailed to the following: H, William Allen Allen Law Firm 1200 Worthen Bank Building Little Rock, AR 72201 John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 South Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 2000 First Commercial Building Little Rock, AR 72201 M, Samuel Jones III Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 2200 Worthen Bank Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 3400 TCBY Tower Little Rock, AR 72201 Ann Brown Office of Desegregation Monitoring P. 0. Box 687 No. Little Rock, AR 72115B 09/11/92 18:04 501 324 2032 L R School Dlst ODM @002/003 Little Rogk School District PRESS release Superintendent Bernd Comments on Teacher Contract Agreement Friday, September 11,1992 For more information, contact Dianne G. Woodruff, 324-2020 E\u0026gt;r. Mac Bemd, superintendent of the Little Rock School District, today thanked teachers in the District and their leadership for working together toward a contract agreement for the 1992-93 school year. Teachers ratified at a 4:30 p.m. meeting today the tentative agreement reached by the District and the Classroom Teachers Association teams late Thursday. The agreement provides that senior teachers who have reached the last step of their salary schedule by the start of the 1992-93 school year will receive $200 each on August 1, 1993, as a non-recurring payment if at the close of the District's 1992-93 fiscal year, total operating receipts, excluding loans, exceed total operating expenses by no less than $100,000. The new contract will expire August 1,1993. Other than these provisions, the new contract, which now must be ratified by the LRSD Board of Directors, is the same contract as the successor contract that expired Tuesday. The Board will consider the proposal at a special board meeting set for 5 p.m. Monday, September 14. -more-09?'ll/92. 18:05 501 324 2032 L R School Dlst ODM @003/003 Page 2 LRSD Contract Comments \"I sincerely appreciate teachers being understanding, reasonable and cooperative in light of District finances and other circumstances. The negotiation process was a fruitful effort overall,\" Bernd added. \"Ultimately, it is most important to underscore that all parties have had the best interests of all the children and all our patrons and staff at heart in reaching the agreement. Dialogue and open communication are paramount if we are to work together to improve teaching and learning. H 'We heard loud and clear the teachers' concerns about classroom discipline and we believe they heard our concerns about the importance of the role supervision plays toward improved safety and security. We know that most teachers volunteer much more than the minimum time proposed for supervision and we believe that they are committed to work cooperatively with us to assure that all schools are equally safe and secure,\" Bernd said. Bemd said he would direct principals to work with their individual staffs to develop building-specific discipline management plans that match need to available supervision time under the contract. \"We know that anytime there is change, there is frustration involved. A lot of things have changed in the District this year. We have a new computer system and a new curriculum supported by a computerized management system to enhance teachers ability to meet individual needs of students. And they are dealing with a new administration. That's a full plate and understandably teachers are concerned and somewhat frustrated with the beginning of a new year. I pledge to work closely with them to make the changes as smooth as possible and to address their concerns,\" Bemd said. -more-Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 Date: October 5, 1994 To: Frank Martin From: Aj/'Ann Brown Subject: Reassignment of IRC Personnel I enjoyed our chat today and look forward to talking with you further on October 18. Thanks for agreeing to look into the situation regarding Leola Scoggins and Pearl Jackson, two IRC aides whose reassignments have made these two CTA members very unhappy. They met with me before school started and I suggested that they talk with you to determine the status of their complaint. Heres a copy of what I received from Leola, which you may already have in your files. 1 appreciate your looking into e matter and letting Leola and Pearl Icnow what next steps to anticipate. They both feel pretty helpless, but perhaps the situation isnt hopeless. Although theres probably not much I can do, please let me know how I can help. Thanks very much.July 20, 1993 Brady Gadberry Labor Relations Specialist 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: IRC Position Dear Brady: I would like to reiterate my desire to be reinstated to Aides position at the Instructional Resource Center. I understand that some aides position might be restored and I would like one of them. I have worked at IRC for several years and in the Little Rock School District for 19 years. Your positive consideration of this request will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, eoIaTCScog' Leola Scoggins August 6, 1993 QUALIFICATIONS: 1. High school diploma: Monticello Arkansas/College Beebe Junior College (3 accredited hours) 2. Demonstrates creative/artistic ability: I demonstrate creative/artistic ability, been apart of this staff for more than 10 Having years our duties consist of creating and designing activities for class room use for students, teachers, and administrators. 3. Experience in computer/typing: amount o experience in'computer/typing. I have a limited But I am eager to learn and I now have a computer system at home that will allow me to enhance my computer/typing skills. 4. Evidence of strong organizational and positive interpersonal skills: I have strong organizational and positive interpersonal skills. Working at IRC for some ten years I always had an excellent relationship with my co-workers, supervisor, administration, and students. I always have a positive outlook once I know the direction I cun to For three years I have been the supervisor and organizer for Home Health Care. I'm in total go. control of daily operations which include the scheduling of vacations and the keeping of payroll records. 5. Ability to understand and carry out oral and written instructions independently and efficiently: This is a daily requirement. 6. Ability to be flexible with work schedule: able to have a flexible work schedule. I am 7. Evidence of a strong commi'tment to quality desegregated education: I see people as who they I have always had an open mind regarding desegregation. are. student regardless of race. I want only the best for each BASIC PERFORMANCE RESPONSIBILITIES:1. 2. I have the ability to assist in the creation and preparation of activities that correlate with curriculum objectives, pre-kindergarten - grade 12. I know that together we can develop a system for working with duplicating materials for several departments in order to have the materials ready for workshops or meeting in a timely manner. 3. If given time I will learn the curriculum the area in which I will assist. 4 . content of I have the knowledge to assist with duties such as video distribution, laminating materials, processing resource materials. 5. I can and will participate in inservices and staff meetings. 6. I can and will report to and complete the daily work schedule as assigned 7. I can and will perform other duties best of my ability. as assigned to theOffice of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown. Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 Date: February 9, 1995 To: LRCTA, NLRCTA, and PACT Managers From: Ann Brown Subject: Monitoring Schedules Enclosed is our schedule for upcoming site-monitoring of some schools in all three districts. I realize this is late notice for the dates that are coming up so soon next week, and I apologize for having inadvertently neglected to inform you before now. However, we have already notified the school districts and building principals that we will be in their schools on those days, so our visit won't come as a surprise to them. 1 want to be true to my commitment to keep you posted on our monitoring schedule, and will notify you as we continue to develop our calendar. Unfortunately, I have had very limited success in trying to coordinate monitoring schedules among the various groups. For example, I did not receive ADE's monitoring schedule until after they had almost completed their visits. I have their commitment to notify me before they begin spring monitoring. As for Joshua, counsel has told me that he presently has no monitoring scheduled, although he may decide to do some at the spur-of-the moment. If so, he is to notify me. We have recently discovered that many PCSSD teachers believe that ODM or the Court has required them to color highlight their plan books to indicate such emphasis as multicultural lessons. Neither ODM nor the Court requires or expects any type of color-coding. As a matter of fact, as we discussed last fall, ODM monitors never even look at teacher plan books. The color highlighting is a request from internal PCSSD monitoring teams, who have no relationship to ODM or the Court. If you have any questions or comments, please don't hesitate to call me. I'll be glad to hear from you.Scheduled ODM Monitoring Visits Date School Monday, February 13, 1995 LRSD Alternative School Tuesday, February 14, 1995 NLRSD Alternative School Thursday, February 16, 1995 PCSSD Alternative School Wednesday, February 22, 1995 Rightsell Incentive School Tuesday, February 28, 1995 Rockefeller Incentive School Thursday, March 2. 1995 Garland Incentive School Friday, March 3, 1995 Franklin Incentive School Tuesday, March 7, 1995 Mitchell Incentive SchoolOffice of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 April 25, 1995 Mrs. Betty L. Mitchell Pulaski Heights Junior High School 401 No. Pine Street Little Rock, AR 72205 Dear Betty: Congratulations on your election to the presidency of the Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association! The post is very challenging and important, and 1 know youll bring energetic leadership to the organization. Id like to invite you to visit my office at your convenience so we can get to know each other better. Tlte ODM staff would love to meet you and answer any questions you may have. Wed be happy to give you a tour of our offices and to explain our monitoring philosophy and approach. We also have a number of monitoring reports on the Uttle Rock School District that wed be pleased to share with you. As you look forward to your presidency, 1 wish you the very best and hope you will not hesitate to let me know whenever 1 may be of assistance. Please let me know when youd like to come by. My colleagues and 1 would welcome the opportunity to visit with you. Sincerely yours, Ann S. Brown cc: Frank Martin 1 AUG 14 1995 August 10, 1995 Office of Desegregdiicn ?\u0026lt;ion'!oriP9 Betty Mitchell Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association 1500 West 4th Street Little Rock, Ar 72201 Dear Ms. Mitchell: The CTA membership of Metropolitan is appointment of Mr. MMiicchhaaeell Peterson concerned over recommendation of the teacher/parent interview the about the unanimous j-euuuunenaarion or the teacher/parent interview team and the recommendation of the Director of Vocational Education for the Little Rock District. Mr. Peterson interviewed. neither applied for the position. He also has no vocational background. nor was he Because of the unique situation of vocational education we urgently need stronger and more experienced vocational leadership for our facility. We realize that the appointment of Mr. Peterson has not been voted on or approved by the Board. T\" 12 _ __ 1_\n_ ___J_____ _ timely response to our inquiry before such action is taken. We would appreciate an immediate and Respectfully, CTA Membership cc: School Board ODM/Ann Brown Frank Martin Revolutionizing Education in Arkansas .4 one-day workshop for Arkansas citizens who want our state's schools revitalized and our children s educational performance optimized. Friday, January 26th, Excelsior Hotel, Little Rock Presented by the Arkansas Policy Foundation Featured Keynote Comments By: Denis Doyle of the Heritage Foundation in Washington D.C. Mr. Doyle currently serves as a Senior Fellow in Education at the Heritage Foundation and since 1980 has written e.xtensiveiy on education reform. Among his recently published books are Winning rhe Brain Race, A Bold Plan to .Slake Our Schools Competitive and Reinventing Education: Entrepreneurship in America's Public Schools. His free- markei, competition based ideas concerning schools have captivated leading reformers around the nation. Michael Williams, former U.S. Assistant Secretary of Education Mr. Williams, a prominent black attorney from Fort Worth. Te-xas, served as Assistant U.S. Secretary of Education under Lamar .Alex.'indcr and Lauro Cavazos. His e.xperience as head of the Department of Education's Civil Rights Division provided him unique knowledge of both school choice reforms and desegregation issues. Fannie Lewis, Cleveland Ohio City Councllwoman/Educatlon Activist Ms. Lewis, a black liberal democrat from Cleveland, Ohio, joined forces with Ohio's white conservative Governor, and together they are revolutionizing Cleveland's schools. Her experiences in school reform should be instructive for Little Rock and any other school districts facing similar challenges. Other special work and information sessions will include... 1. New developments on the legal front that could expedite the lifting of court-monitored desegregation plans...of particular interest to Little Rock School Districts. 2. The dangers of Outcome Sased Education (OBE) and what to do about them. 3. A preview of an innovative new privately funded voucher program in Little Rock. The Children's Educational Opportunity Foundation {CEO program). currently benefiting almost 400 parents and children. 4. A comprehensive overview of bold new education reform initiatives across the states. Also...The Great Debate on School Choice and Voucher Issues! Grainger Ledbetter of the Arkansas Education Association (AEA) vs. Jeanne Allen with the Center for Education Reform SPACE LIMITED...PLAN TO ATTEND NOW!! FRIDAY, JANUARY 26TH, EXCELSIOR HOTEL, LITTLE ROCK 10:00 am until 4:00 PM...($15.00 conference fee includes lunch) I Call Donna Watson at 501-227-4815 by Jan. 19th, 1996. The Arkansas Policy Foundation, 8201 Cantrell Road, #325, Little Rock, Arkansas 72227re: Rnoo . rrsi ra TAI \u0026gt; FEB January 30, 1996 Office of Oesesreaaicn M 5018 Country Club Blvd. Little Rock, AR 72207 Betty Mitchell LRCTA 1500 West 4th, Suite 305 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ms. Mitchell, I would like to be appointed to the new Desegregation Planning Committee. I talked with Ms. Pondexter about it today. She suggested that I write the request to you. I am qualified to serve for several reason. My son will graduate next year from Central High School. He has attended the Little Rock public schools since he entered kindergarten. I have taught school for the Little Rock School District for twenty-five years. I taught at the Kramer Project for ten years. For the next fifteen years I have worked at the Rockefeller Early Childhood Magnet/Incentive School. I have taught four-year olds since 19888, I was a member of the Early Childhood Committee that was begun by Mr. Reviile in 1989. Since I have been a strong supporter of the L.R.S.D. and early childhood education, as well as teaching at an incentive school. 1 feel I would be an asset to your committee. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely yours, Beth Foti cc\nLinda Pendexter I*Ln-TLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 TO. Bvidrd of Directors FROM: THROUGH: SUBJECT\nFebruary' 1996 bred L. Smith. Manager of Support Services Henrv^ Superintendent of School.? I SenbeeMaster (jtuestions he toiiowing informatio! is being provided in response to concerns raised by M? Gee (list snacheii\nand .Ms. Pondexte., Section 6.6 of'he ServiceMaster contract is attached. Item s2 of Ms. Gees list - ServiceMaster will receive no more than the contract amount Any additional savings below the 510.8 million budget amo'unt will remam wmh the District Item ot Ms. Gees list - It was agreed that withi.n 40 days no adjustment to the 1995-96 budget would be made since we would only be charged a pro-rated amount for the first year of tiie contract  Item 01 M.\u0026lt;. Gees list - Four (4) payments have oeen made to Se'wiceMaster for the months of October. 1995, tnrough January, 1^96.  Item 45 of Ms. uees h$t - The S'.G.213 per monli: is Lite amount to satisfv the auarantes since ServiceMaster is required to provide actual documentation to support the supplies and equipment cost  Item 46 of Ms. Gees list - Based on actual expenditures for the past several ye.ars, the 1995- 96 budget amount provides a realistic baseline. item ^7 of Ms. Gees list - .^.nached is a schedule that shews the $10 8 million. With respect to the energy savings, the effect of the energy savings orograms has alrcadv be?-, includea m the 1995-96 budget. It is true that a mild winter would have a positive i -noact guarantee compliance. The converse is also true impact on guarantee compliance. on \\ harsh wmter would have a nesatn. 1JC  hem ot Ms. Crees iis' - h is probably not possible to list all potential points of concern However we eo have a detailed budget and Exhibit A is a part of the contract.  Item #9 ol Ms. Gees list - 'fhe OEM system would only enhance, not conflict with, the Districts system. cc. Doug Eaton Jerr/ Compton FLSxa3  Little Rock Schoo! District 1995-So Biidsel Ana'ysis FuncSon ,-tncno.i Jesaiphon 2639 Other Faciiities Acq 3Co 2542 Upkeep or Suildings 2641 Service .Area Oirecuoi 2544 Upkeep of Squipmerii 2545 VePicie Maintenance 26-10 Asbesios rrogra.m \\1agnet SctipoiG Sooeptuies A.^nojn! '$240,213 8.924.431 201.085 12,800 S3.20C 61,338 1.076.370 2'30,000 Tata $10,779,937Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 376-6200 Fax (501) 371 -0100 June 26, 1997 Ms. Betty Mitchell 107 Detonti Drive Little Rock, AR 72113 Dear Betty: As you leave the presidency of the LRCTA and return to the classroom, 1 want to tell you how very much my colleagues at ODM and I have enjoyed working with you during your tenure. You brought your level head and steady hands to the helm during a time when the Little Rock School District was (once again) navigating troubled waters. Despite the turbulence, you never failed to keep your balance, perspective, and on-target grasp of the facts: you could always penetrate the rhetorical fog and see what was really going on. (More than once, your knowing glance inspired me to hang in at yet another tong meeting!) But no matter how great the challenge or vexing the circumstances, you never failed to maintain your congenial, down-to-earth demeanor that has always made me glad to see you. You have earned my respect, gratitude, and affection, Betty, and all of us at ODM will certainly miss you. However, I know where to find you, and Ill look forward to catching up with you at the flea markets. All best wishes for a happy return to the classroom. Sincerely yours, 'Ann S. BrownLRCTA PN UPDATE $$$Big Bucks$$$ for Central Office Chicken Feed for School Employees After months of excuses and delays the District finally presented its salary offer to the Association last night. Rarely have promising negotiations taken so drastic a nose dive. Despite the lavish raises Dr. Camine showered on his favorite administrators, (excluding the superintendent, the highest paid LRSD administrative position jumped 13% from $64,831 to $90,000) there is precious little in the cookie jar for the folks in the trenches. The Districts three year offer is a clear indication of just where teachers and support persoimel figure on the Districts priority list. 1st Year ( 3% of last Years Sth Circuit money) NO NEW MONEY 2nd Year 1.75% 3rd Year 1.75% To sweeten this deal the District threw in a paltry $200 increase in the senior stipend and raised the District contribution on the insurance to $174. To Add Insult To Injury...this so-called offer is withdrawn if\n The property tax amendment passes and the property tax is abolished.  The Sth Circuit money turns out to be less than 7 million for any of the three years.  The Arkansas Legislature changes the funding formula to little Rocks detriment. The question on the mind of every hardworking teacher and ESP should be... Why does the District always find big bucks for top level administrators and only nickels and dimes for the employees who actually work with students? DISCIPLINE: The two teams are at loggerheads on this critical issue. Our priority is safe and orderly classrooms, the Districts seems to be safeguarding the authority of its principals. WERE MILES APART..BUT WERE STILL TALKING.... The Districts proposal on the supplemental salary schedule is a good beginning but a three year deal with little or no money is impossible. The contract has been extended to the day before students arrive and we believe a settlement is still possible. Any real progress depends on Dr. Camine and his Administration understanding that we need more than lip service on discipline and that our salaries are every bit as important as the salaries of his downtown administrators!!! TRANSFERS \u0026amp; VACANCIES..The District has bungled transfers and vacancies this year even more than usual. If you believed you have been unjustly denied a position, moved or surplused without just cause, call the office ASAP. QUOTE OF THE YEAR.. On July 22, in the Arkansas Democrat, Dr. Camine was quoted as saying that he tried to limit administrators pay raises to 10 percent. Needless to say he was not successful.8' i^nrki \"?, I*-- a: 2201 (5GVittle Rock Classroom Teachers Associafioi\u0026gt; Update RECEIVED NOV 2 3 1988 November 17, 1998 OFFICE OF DESEGS3EGAT10N MONITORING As you well know, the Association has ratified an agreement that includes a 4.5% raise, more than $500.00 added to tlie topped - out stipend for those not receiving an annual increment, increases for stipend work and many other new items in the contract. One of tlie more frustrating aspects of the negotiation was trying to fix a date when we could start collecting the new raises (as well as the 3% raise still due under last years contract). Because the money needs to be released by the Federal District Court, everyone it seems has been pointing the finger there as the cause of the problem. However, our inquiries to the Office of Desegregation Monitoring has indicated that the blame rests with the Little Rock School District and the Pulaski County Special School District, who have been ordered to negotiate a settlement between their differences over how much each district is to receive from the court. Well, those negotiations have broken down and the court now is required to conduct a hearing on the matter before rendering a decision. That date is January 4,1999. No one expects the decision from that hearing to be delayed in any way so as soon as a decision is rendered, then our agreement with the Little Rock School District calls for payment under the contract to begin within thirty (30) days. The court decision will not affect the negotiated agreement in any way. But it will result in the payment being postponed until early 1999.AN OPEN LETTER TO THE MEMBERSHIP OF LRCTA Lou Ethel Nauden 4400 West 22 nd Street Little Rock, AR 72204 November 19, 1998 Willie Givens, President Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association 1500 West 4\nh Street Little Rock, /irkansas 72201 Dear Mr Givens: This letter is written confirmation of my verbal resignation of my membership in the Little Rock Classroom Tt'achers .Association effective for the 1998-99 School 'f ear. I am convinced that the Association vdth its current STAFF and LEADERSHIP is no longer working in the best interest of the tear hets of the Little Rock School l.)istrict. I have spent many years v/orking in the Association with man) different presidents and numerous elected leaders. 1 have agreed and disagreed philosophically with a number of them, however, I was convinced, that all of them v/ere committed to serving in the best interest of the membership. 1 no longer sense that commitment on the part of the current staff and leadership. It saddens me to see how truly self-serving 'the leadership has become. I he lack of staff competence and commitment further troubles me. As I worked 1 dreamed of seeing tfie LRCTA Logo on our owtj building in tine city of Little Rock, and of an organization so strong that we could have a major i mpact ori educational issues in this commiinily. I guess it was just an unrealistic dream. I directed all of my resources toward w\u0026lt;\n-rki ng in the local association, never seeking state or national elective office, because I knew our members were primarily concer ned with issues thiat impacted them in their immediate enviromnent, the Little Rock School Distric t and the state of Arkansas. My tenure as president of the Association, my seivice as a board member, and my many years of w orking with the PN Team as a member and as chairperson were all services rendered unselfishly. There are tho le who hasten to criticize my decision to resign with the\nspurious argument that when the ball game is not played my way, 1 take my ball and go home To those critics I say, You are play ing with my ball - my thirty-two years of service to the organization. And more importantly, yon are not playing the game well. A parapjV'ise of.some advice from the poet, Kipling, expresses my teelings clearly. I CANNOl and WILL NOT be led by a company of fools. Sincerely, Lou Ethel NaadenI I 10B  ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE  SATURDAY, JUNE 13, I I A long way to go as LRSD, CTA open contract negotiations BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazelle Staff Writer In the first teacher contract negotiating session of the year, Little Rock School District representatives Friday pro Elimination of hospital indemnity, short-term disability, long-term disability or life insurance coverage for employees by the district. The district would contribute $17.06 posed cutting the work years employee'per month' for the length next year, freezing teacher salaries and reducing insurance benefits. Representatives of the school district and the Classroom Teachers Association met for about 30 minutes Friday afternoon to exchange economic proposals. state health plan coverage and $13.44 per employee per month for dental insurance. The dis- trict now pays the entire portion of the individual em- The meeting, which was closed to the public, marked the beginning of negotiations on the 1992-93 teachers contract. The three-year contract now in effect is due to expire Sept. 8. Jim Moore, an attorney who represents the school district, and Eleanor Coleman, CTA president, would not disclose the terms of the contract proposals made by their negotiating teams Friday. We have a long way to go, Coleman said. A very long way. A source who asked not to be identified told the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette that the CTA is asking for a 10 percent salary increase for next year. In addition, the source said the district - which is facing a $7.7 million budget deficit next year - is asking for.numerous reductions in employee benefits, including:  A five-day reduction in the work year, which could result in less pay for employees. It was not clear Friday if the reduction would affect all certified employees or just those who have annual contracts for 9'/2 months or longer.  No overall salary raises and no incremental increases for an additional year of experience. District teachers have generally received 3 percent increases for experience along with a general pay raise. ployee health insurance coverage not paid by the state. This year, the state pays $71 per employee and the district pays $122.  An increase in student instruction time for elementary and secondary teachers. Secondary teachers, for example, could eventually be required to teach as much 5% hours a day if the proposal is adopted. That compares with the current limit of 5 hours a day.  A reduction in teacher planning time from 270 minutes to 230 minutes a week.  Teachers may be required to supervise pupils in the lunchroom for an average of one day per week. The current contract gives teachers a duty- free 30-minute lunch period. If the proposal is approved, teachers also could be assigned to supervise children on the playground without extra pay. Now, teachers who volunteer for playground duty are paid $10 an hour. According to the source, the CTA in its proposal has asked for an additional day of personal leave. payment for unused sick leave, a teacher retirement incentive and direct deposit of paychecks. No date was set Friday for the next negotiations session. The negotiations are done by team.s representing the district and the teachers. Any agreement the teams reach must be submitted to the ' school board and the CTA membership for ratification.Aricansas Democrat (gazette SATURDAY, AUGUST 22, 1992 = I B Tough issues take CTA, LRSD through day of talks Representatives of the Little Rock School District and the Classroom Teachers Association worked for about eight hours Friday on the 1992-93 teachers contract without reaching a settlement. The two negotiating teams will resume their talks at 4:30 p.m. Monday  the day most dis- trict teachers will return to' ered by the terms of the 1991-92 contract, which does not expire until Sept. 8. The negotiating sessions are closed to the public, and spokesmen for both teams have declined to give any specific details about the issues in dispute. Frank Martin, executive director of the CTA, said the teams spent Friday holding long discussions on a couple of issues that have disturbed both teachers and administrators for many years. He called them tough issues and said the districts team is asking for concessions from the teachers that the district cant buy. In June, the CTA asked for 10 percent raises, plus an annual 3 percent incremental raise for -- - V.1 yc3r of experience. The district proposed freezing salaries and increments. Since that time, however, the district included the incremental experience raises in the 1992-93 budget. Teachers who are the most experienced and are at the top of the salary schedule are not eligible for the incremental raises. The negotiating teams met each day this week.LRSD, CTA attain tentative agreement Arkansas Democrat \"CSazettc FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 1992. BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazene Staff Writer Negotiating teams for the Little Rock School District and the Classroom Teachers Association reached a tentative agreement on the 1992-93 teacher contract about 10:40 p.m. Thursday after five hours of negotiations. A.W. Mille, a mediator with the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, said no details of the tentative agreement would be released before a CTA membership meeting set for 4:30 p.m. today at Hall High School. Mille said he thought it best not to divulge details so that rumors wouldnt hurt the agreement. He said it was best if all teachers heard the agreement at the same time. We think it is a mutually satisfying agreement, Jim Moore, an attorney for the district, said. Eleanor Coleman, CTA president, said, Weve pushed hard to get a decent settlement. The old contract expired at I midnight Tuesday, Teachers vot-ed earlier this week to take a strike vote Sept. 17 if an agreement was not reached. The big issues in the talks had been the districts request for additional supervision time from teachers and teachers concerns about a lack of enforcement of the student discipline policies. The district team declared an impasse Tuesday, prompting the two teams to call in the mediator. Mille carried proposals back and forth between the teams Wednesday and Thursday nights. 'The teams never met until after the tentative agreement was reached Thursday night. About 1,600 of the districts teachers are expected to get an average 2.8 percent pay raise for their additional year of experience. The remaining teachers are ineligible for an experience increment. The CTA and the Little Rock School Board must ratify the Agreement to make it official. -ARKAN^S DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE  SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 1992  LR teachers union ratifies contract, keeps contror of workday BY CYNTHIA HOWELL mocrat-Gazdfle Start Wmtr The Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association on Friday ratified a 1992-93 teacher con- traclf that virtually is identical to the 1991-92 contract, which e.xpired at midnight Tuesday. The new agreement calls for npuiew teacher supervision duties, no shorter preparation periods or longer workdays, all of which were proposed early in the negotiations by the Little Rock School District. The new agreement does alter the expiration date of the contract so ' that future negotiations wont occur while school is in session. It was moved from Sept. 8 to Aug. I. Host discrict teachers will get an average 2.3 percent pay increase for their additional year of experience. However, about 350 teachers are ineligible for an experience increment The new agreement says that if district revenues exceed expenditures bjf $100,000 this year, senior teachers will get a S200 onetime payment by Aug. 1. \"I feel like an abused senior citizen, one teacher of 20 years quipped after the CT.A. membership meeting at Hall High School. 1 don't know how they can justify not giving raises to those of us who have dedicated our lives to the district\" About 500 of the districts 2,000 teachers attended the meeting. The beginning teacher salary will remain at $19,489. A teacher with 20 years of experience and a masters degree plus 30 hours of additional college credit will earn $39,485. See CONTRACT. Page 18A Teachers  Continued from Page 1A We're pleased to have an agreement.\" Eleanor Coleman, CTA president, said. \"Some of the teachers are not totally pleased and that is understandable. We were not able to get what we wanted for our senior teachers. I am one of them. I won't get a single penny more this year.' Coleman said the CT.A will be able to work with administrators to improve student discipline through a standing ad hoc committee that exists in the contract. During the contract negotiations. the CTA members complained that district administrators were lax in enforcing student discipline policies. Most teachers interviewed Friday were philosophical about the status quo contract, the first in many years that did not provide across-the-board raises, Its acceptable. I can live with it, Jake Tidmore, a teacher at Southwest Junior High School, said. We didnt get a raise. That was the bad news. The good news was we didnt give up anything. Its acceptable. I can live with it. We didnt get a raise. That was the bad news. The good news was we didnt give up anything. Im all right about it for one year, Patsy Campbell, a district employee of more than 30 years, said about the lack of a raise. I think the cuts (made in July by the board) were real. The board cut $10.7 million in expenses this year to balance the district budget. We didnt want to go on strike or disrupt the students, Linda Jones, a teacher at Hall High School, said. But she also said she was disappointed with Superintendent Mac Bernd for creating an adversarial relaSTUDYING THE CONTRACT  Sue Buffalo, a counselor at the Alternative Learning Center in the Little Rock School District, examines Friday a copy of the 1992-93 contract negotiated by the district and the Little Rpck Classroom Teachers Association. Teachers ratifiediti agreement Friday afternoon at Hall High School. tionship with teachers and for reducing the number of counselors in the district. Representatives of the CTA and the school district reached a tentative contract agreement late Thursday night with the assistance of A.W. Mille, a mediator with the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service. The terms of the agreement were not released until Fridays meeting. Before the agreement becomes final, the school board must approve it. A special meeting to vote on the pact, as well as to decide the process for filling a vacant board seat and to discuss the feasibility of Saturday morning football games, is set for 5 p.m. Monday at the administration building at 810 W. Markham St. \"I sincerely appreciate teachers being understanding, reasonable and cooperative in light of district finances and other circumstances, Bernd said at a news conference Friday afternoon. The negotiations process was a fruitful effort overall. He said district administrators heard \"loud and clear Bernd said he would direct principals to work with their staffs to develop discipline management plans at the schools. He also acknowledged the change that teachers face this -4 ZJ Arkansas Oamocrat-Gazena/Oavid GoOschaik teachers concerns about classroom discipline. We believe they heard our concerns about the importance of the role supervision plays toward improved safety and security. We know that most teachers volunteer much more than the minimum time proposed for supervision and we believe they are are committed to work cooperatively with us to assure that all schools are equally safe and secure. 1 year as the result of a new I sincerely appreciate teachers being understanding, reasonable and cooperative in light of district finances and other circumstances. riculum, a new computer system and a new administration. Thats a full plate and understandably teachers are concerned and somewhat frustrated? ... I pledge to work closely with them to make the changes as smooth as possible and to address their concerns, Bernd said. Bernd said he plans to appoint a joint committee as allowed by the contract to study the feasibility of increasing the instructional day. Increasing instructional time was part of the districts original proposal in the contract negotiations, but was withdrawn. He alio called on teachers to assist district administrators in appealing for help from the state Legislature to curb escalating costs of employee health benefits. j The district pays KW percent of the costs of the benefits for individual employees. The district absorbed a $1.4 million increase in insurance costs this year.Arkansas Democrat Y azcttc FRIDAY. FEBRUARY 12. 1993 Copyright C 1993. Little Rock Newspapers, 1nc. Bernd urged to settle pact with CTA Board members ask about 93-94 budget Little Rock School Board members Dorsey Jackson and John Moore urged Superintendent Mac Bernd on Thursday to meet with the Classroom Teachers Association and settle the 1993-94 teacher contract as soon as possible. The topic came up during the boards monthly agenda meeting. The board members asked when the 1993-94 budget would be ready for board action. Bernd has said that expenses would have to be cut for next year by about S5.2 million. Two committees, one made up of district residents and another of employees, are reviewing district expenses and will make a report to Bernd in early March about ways to save money and operate more efficiently- Bernd said he plans to present the proposed budget to the board by late March or early April. Jackson said it would be good to have employee contracts settled by that time, and he recommended that negotiations begin soon so that outdated contract provisions could be discussed and eliminated. Gary Jones, the districts manager of resources and school support, said he has met with eight different employee groups, but only the teachers have a contract for the current year. He said that negotiations are drawing to a close on a two-year contract for district bus drivers and custodians. He estimated that those settlements could be reached within two to four weeks. Were very close, he said.Arkansas Democrat '^(i^azelte SUNDAY, MARCH 14. 1993 Copyright 0 1993, Little Rock Newspapers. Inc. M T . Arkansas Democrat ^(fjazette Ledbetter outpolls 2, wins AEA presidency BY JERRY DEAN Democrat-Gazette Staff Writer Grainger Ledbetter, 36, an English teacher in the Little Rock School District, was chosen Saturday as president of the Arkansas Education Association. About 9,100 AEA members statewide gave Ledbetter 55.1 percent of the vote over candidates Kay Williams, 50, of Greene County Ledbetter Tech in Paragould and Carolyn Jones, 43, of Watson Education Center in El Dorado. Those results mean a runoff wont be necessary in the AEAs general elections April 19-27. Pat Jones, an AEA spokesman, said the AEA Elections Committee will have to certify results of the election to Sid Johnson, a Fort Smith teacher who is the current AEA president, on Monday. Ledbetter, who begins serving his two-year term Aug. 1, said he had campaigned extensively for the office. He thanked his campaign chairman, Eleanor Coleman, and congratulated his opponents on an issues-oriented race. Im going to try to build a unified association that can face tough issues that arent getting any easier, Ledbetter said. Those issues include re-examining health insurance bidding and costs, educational reforms, and collective bargaining efforts aimed at improving teachers salaries and working conditions statewide, he said. Ledbetter, who most recently taught English at Henderson Junior High, promised to remain an outspoken advocate sonnel. He is now on a leave of absence to complete his masters degree in history. Ledbetter, now serving on the AEA Executive Committee and the executive committee of the National Council of Urban Education Associations, has taught in Little Rock public schools 11 years. Ledbetter has been president of the AEA local organi-zation, the Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association,' for four years. ' He is best known for haVing led a districtwide teaghers strike that closed schoojs.for six days, and for having Ipd a strike of the districts school bus drivers. AEA presidents are. restricted to serving no more, than two two-year terms as president. for teachers and support per- I WEDNESDAY, JULY 14,1993  3B CTA will consider renegotiating raises\nBY DANNY SHAMEER Democrat-Gazette Education Writer The Little Rock School District will approach the teachers union Monday to discuss a num- ber of matters  including whether teachers are willing to renegotiate part of their 3 percent raises. Estelle Matthis, interim superintendent, said Tuesday she will bring up the matter of the raises next week when she meets with Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association President Eleanor Coleman and CTA Executive Director Frank Martin. The CTA office is closed until Monday. Matthis meeting with the CTA also will deal with other matters involving the upcoming school year. The federal judge who oversees the desegregation case ordered the Little Rock School Board to pare down its $140 million budget and left it up to the district on how to do it. ! The board met in a workshop session last Friday, when it asked the district administration to look at about $3 million in cuts and outlined four other general areas to consider. The board wants to know if the CTA would be willing to con-' : sider giving up part of the 3 per-: i cent teacher raise for the 1993-: 94 academic year.  ? Other areas the board asked the district to look at included\nreducing expenses in services, supplies and equipment\nstaffing efficiency\nhow to phase in teacher training sessions on a new system to track student learning and the impact of possibly closing Ish Elementary School, a decision that would be made by a federal court. U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright has given the district until 6 p.m. Aug. 2 to submit a revised 1993-94budget. Hearings on the revised bud-\nget are set for Aug. 12-13.  :How to kill a city (And how to build one) Neighborhood rivalries, petty jealousies, suspicions and turf wars . . . all can combine to kill a community. One was reminded of that ugly possi- iility just this week, when the director of one museum in Little Rock issued a public statement attacking plans to build a new, large-screen theater in connection with another museum in town. A different and better spirit was shown by a couple of other items in the news:  The union of classroom teachers in Little Rock agreed to reconsider  not give up. mind you, just rethink  part of the 3 percent raise the teachers are due next school year. For a group that got no raise this last school year, thats civic spirit. The union has recognized the bind that the Little Rock School District has got itself into. Its willingness to cooperate with the school board shows a spirit of cooperation. It also shows a warranted respect for the federal judge overseeing the district. The judge, Susan Webber Wright, has told the district it shouldnt be budgeting money thats going to run out for expenses that will keep recurring  like teachers salaries. Thats sound, if obvious, advice. The teachers willingness to think about this shows sound judgment  and good will. You can build a lot on those qualities.  ACORN, whose local chapter would much prefer electing all city directors by ward, nevertheless has come out in favor of the proposal on the ballot Tuesday to elect only seven directors by ward, and elect another three city-wide. Thats the plan proposed by the Future-Little Rock project after long sessions and considerable effort. By supporting the plan on Tuesdays ballot. .ACORN is accepting the popular will\na plan to elect all directors by ward was turned down by the voters just last year. ACORN is is now ready to accept half a loaf. Or rather seventenths of a loaf, since seven of the ten directors would be elected by ward, while all are elected at-large now. To quote .ACORNs spokesman, The Future-Little Rock proposal is not perfect, but we do believe it is better tian the system we have now. Such an approach shows a talent for compromise and a capacity for good will. Both qualities will be needed if Little Rock is to thrive in the years ahead. Little Rock can work if all its people work together. Arkansas Democrar Established 1871 Arkansas azeUe Established 1819 Arkansas Democrat (gazette Arkansas' Newspaper Walter E. Hussman, Jr., Publisher Griffin Smith, jr. Ejcecubve Editor Paul Greenberg Editoriai Page Editor Paul R. Smith V.P. / General Manager Lynn Hamilton V.P. / Operations John Mobbs Advertising Director Larry Graham Circulation Director Estel Jeffery, Jr. Director of Promotions 6B  SATURDAY, JULY 24, 1993   Copyright 9 1993 UWe Rock Newsoaoers. Inc.Arkansas Democrat (gazette\n SATURDAY, APRIL 23,1994 Copyright  tittle Rock Newspapers, Inc. LR teachers seek 6 percent raise BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat*Gazette Educatkxi Writer The Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association wants a 6 percent across-the-board raise next year, although The CTAs initial proposal school officials initial contract proposal would freeze salaries. Negotiating teams for the Little Rock School District and the CTA met for the first time Monday and Tuesday to clarify their proposals for changes in the 1994-95 teachers contract. There are about 60 proposals on the table. Frank Martin, CTA executive director, and Brady Gad- berry, district labor relations director, said they would like to complete negotiations for next year by the end of May, Martin and Gadberry are the chief negotiators for their teams, which are scheduled to meet at least two afternoons a week until May 23. If the teams reach a tentative agreement on a contract, it must be submitted to the school board and the CTA membership for final approval. calls for a 6 percent raise for all teachers, plus an incremental raise of about 3 percent for each eligible employee for experience. Longtime employees who have reached the top of the salary schedule are ineligible for the experience increment. The district has proposed reductions of two days in the teacher work year, a reduction in fringe benefits, and a cap on William Broadnax. Besides Martin, the CTA the districts contribution to employees health insurance team includes CTA President coverage. Currently, the state and the district pay the employees insurance, although employees must pay for coverage fortheir spouses and chil- dren. -\n, Also on the table is the experience increment, which is now a $2 million provision in the districts 1994-95 budget j proposal but has been proposed as a cut to balance the budget. Besides Gadberry, Little Rock district negotiating team members include Mark Mil- hoilen, manager of support services\nDr. Richard Hurley, director of human resources\nAssistant Superintendent Lan7 Robertson\nFranklin Incentive School Principal Franklin Davis\nDodd Elementary School Principal Patty McNeil\nand Henderson Junior High School Assistant Principal i 1 I Eleanor Coleman and teachers Katherine Wright Knight Betty Mitchell, Don Williams, Clementine Kelley, Deborah DesJardin and Johnny Gross. The next two sessions are set for 4:30 p.m. Monday and Tuesday. hArkansas Democrat '^(Gazette ' FRIDAY, MAY 13,1994 Rival teacher union to fight job cuts Group says LRSD broke law by not sending letters earlier BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazette Education Writer A small and little-known , group of teachers affiliated with the American Federation of i Teachers and the AFL-CIO will challenge the Little Rock School Districts decision to eliminate 80 teaching positions next year. The Federation of Metropolitan Teachers, which says it has about 200 members, will send a letter to the school district alleging the district violated the Arkansas Teacher Fair Dismissal Act. Larry Buck, a teacher at Henderson Junior High School, said 'Thursday the district didnt notify all affected teachers by May 1 of its plans to eliminate their jobs or to discontinue the supplemental pay about 400 teachers get for extra duty. Extra duty includes coaching, sponsoring student activities or supervising students before or after school. The Fair Dismissal Act auto- matically renews the contracts of certified teachers and administrators if the employees arent notified of changes in their working conditions by May 1. May 1 was a Sunday. Buck, chairman of the federations legal services committee, said some of the affected teachers got their letters April 30, a Saturday\nothers didnt get them until the next Monday, May 2. So all affected teachers and supplemental pay contracts should be reinstated. Buck said. He said it would be unfair to employees to only reinstate those teachers who received notices May 2. un- Brady Gadberry, director of labor relations for the district, said all the notices were sent by certified mail April 29, in compliance with the law. He said the significant date is the postmark, not the date the teacher got the letter. Buck said he hopes the dispute can be resolved within the district. Asked if the federation would sue the district, he said that decision would have to be made later. The district is cutting positions as a cost-saving measure. The supplemental pay contracts are being reviewed and many will be reinstated once district officials have determined what extra duty positions are needed based on student enrollment for next year and teacher job signments. as- The federation is affiliated not only with the AFL-CIO but with the Arkansas Federation of Teachers, which has about 2,500 members. Buck said. The AFT and its Arkansas affiliates are rivals of the National Education Association and its affiliates, the Arkansas Education Association and the Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association.I Arkansas Democrat W^azcttTI TUESDAY, AUGUST 2, 1994 Copyright  UWe Rock Newspapers, Jnc. LRSD teachers to decide today on new contract\nOK predicted Little Rock School District teachers will vote today on a proposed contract that would give most of them incremental pay raises in the coming school year for experience. The district and the Classroom Teachers Association tentatively agreed to a contract July 18. The contract doesnt include an across-the-board raise for teachers. The Little Rock School Board also must approve the contract. Frank Martin, CTA executive director, said he expects the teachers to approve the contract. The CTA, which has about 2,000 members, will vote at 4:30 p.m. at Hall High School. The tentative contract includes the incremental raise traditionally paid to eligible teachers for their extra year of That increment experience. will be $803 per teacher this year. The districts most senior teachers, those with 20 or more years of experience, are ineligible for the increment and wont get a raise.WEDNESDAY, WTTW Copyngnt O UWe Rock Newspapers, inc. LRSD teachers approve new contract BY CHRIS REINOLDS Democrat-Gazette Start Writer Little Rock School District teachers grudgingly approved a contract for the 1994-95 school year Tuesday that includes a pay increase for teachers with less than 20 years experience, but no across-the-board raise, No ones coming out of here very happy, Frank Martin, executive director of the Classroom Teachers Association, said after the vote. The teachers are not going to continue to subsidize the districts mismanagement. Martin said the approximate-ly 280 teachers in attendance voted for the contract in a voice  vote. Officials said the turnout teacher at Fair Park Elemen-was low  the district employs tary, said she voted against the about 1,700 teaches  because contract because 20-year veter-many teachers were on vacation ans wont get raises and smok-or at work, ing is now banned on school The contract includes the grounds. raise traditionally paid to eligi Ive been smoking since the ble teachers for their extra year of experience. That increment will be $803 per teacher this year. About 400 of the districts most senior teachers, those with 20 or more years of experience\n, are ineligible for the increment. Gail Delozier, a first-grade eighth grade and I wasnt bothering anybody, Delozier said, Its the only filing I can do to get a release, See TEACHERS, Page 7B BALLOT BROWSING  Little Rock School District schoolteachers Gail Delozier (left) and Malinda Martin look over the ballot before the Little Rock Classroom Teach- Arkansas Defnocrat-Gazstta/DavKl Gottschalk ers Associations vote Tuesday night on the 1994-95 teachers contract. Those present approved the pact reluctantly. Teachers  Continued from Page IB Faye Parker, a teacher at the Little Rock Adult Education Center, said she voted for the contract, We didnt lose any benefits, Parker said. District officials and the Classroom Teachers Association tentatively agreed to the contract July 18, but it required approval by the teachers union and the school board. The school board hasnt voted on the contract. The CTA negotiating team made a plea directly to Superintendent Henry Williams for an increase or bonus for the senior teachers. But Williams said granting that request would deplete the districts pool of reserve money. Other terms of the contract include:  No changes to the 1993-94 salaiy schedule for 1994-95. The starting salary for a beginning teacher will remain at $20,074 for the second straight year.  A new contract expiration date of June 30, 1995, The 1993- 94 contract expired Monday.  Creation of a teacher-administrator committee to clarify ambiguous language in the , contract.  An increase in allowances for travel expenses to conform with changes made for the district administrators and school board members.  Clarification of the longterm leave policies for teachers. FRIDAY, AUGUST 26,1994  7B LRSD board tables motion on teacher bonuses BY SHAREESE HAROLD Democrat-Gazette Staff Writer Tenured teachers in the Little Rock School District will have to wait until the next school board meeting to find out if they will receive a salary bonus this school year. The board voted Thursday to table a proposal that would have given at the end of the school year a bonus to teachers at the top of the pay schedule who are not receiving raises this year. Earlier this month, the board ratified teacher contracts for the 1994 1995 school year that did not include salary increases for those who have taught 20 or more years in the district. Board member Linda Pon- dexter, a Little Rock educator for 26 years, said she felt slighted by district administrators who waited until Thursday to explain that her proposal might cause snags in the districts federal desegregation case. Pon- dexter initiated the proposal three weeks ago. But isnt it strange, she said, that a letter from our attorney, dated with todays date, was sent to us explaining the potential legal problems we could have with this motion? Jerry Malone, one of the districts desegregation attorneys, urged the board to consider how the court would view an action to compensate teachers by a method not spelled out in the budget policy handbook it gave the court. Board member Kevin OMalley moved to table the issue until the legal problems are addressed. I can support the philosophy behind this motion, OMalley said, but there are problems with it now. The board voted unanimously to discuss the issue at its next meeting. It also voted to consider Pendexters proposal to use excess state funds the district might receive this year once student enrollment figures are tallied to compensate the teachers. I think this action is necessary to give those who have served this district the longest a shot in the arm, Pondexter said. About 520 teachers and education support staff members could be alTected by the bonus. Pondexlers motion would direct the districts labor negotiators to settle the bonus amount with the teachers union negotiators. In other business, the board rejected on the first reading a revised employee nepotism policy that would have allowed distant relatives of board members and the superintendent to work in the district. It also voted to sell the Eastside Junior High School building at 14th and Scott Streets. Adult education courses now being held at that school will be moved to Forest Heights Junior High School at University Avt enue and Evergreen Street. The 47-year-old structure is in the citys historical district and has not been used as a junior high school since 1964.1 Arkansas Democrat '^(j?azcltg SATURDAY_, APRIL. 22,1995 Special ed teacher to lead association Betty Mitchell, a special education teacher at Pulaski Heights Junior High School, was recently elected president of the Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association. She defeated John Gross, CTA vice president and a teacher at Dunbar Magnet Junior High, for the position. Mitchell will take office Aug. 1, following Eleanor Coleman, an elementary school counselor who was the union president for four years. I want to maintain the strength and unity that the CTA has always had and exhibited, Mitchell said when asked about the goals for her two-year term. Its imperative that we continue to have stability at a time when the Little Rock School District is unstable because of its finances and the discipline problems in the schools.Arkansas Democrat ^(j^azette THURSDAY, JUNE 15, 1995 LR teachers push for mediation BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Dernocrat-Gazette Education Writer Contract negotiators for the Little Rock School District and the Classroom Teachers Association want help  and fast  from the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service. Brady Gadberry, the districts director of labor relations, and Frank Martin, CTA executive director, agreed Friday to ask the mediation service to select an outside fact-finder who can come into the district this month to recommend terms of a settlement on the 1995-96 teachers contract. Recognizing that difficult bargaining was ahead, negotiators for the two organizations agreed weeks ago to use a fact-finder to help them resolve their differences. The fact-finder from Texas selected by the negotiators couldnt come to Little Rock until mid-August. Martin said Friday the teams cant wait that long. The contract expires the first of August. The two teams of administrators and teachers have been meeting regularly to negotiate changes in the contract language, but theyve set aside some potentially explosive salary issues. Officials in the financially strapped school district have recommended a two-day cut in the teacher work year and an accompanying cut in pay to help avoid a budget deficit next year. The district also has recommended freezing all employee salaries and not distributing the annual 3 percent increment that many teachers traditionally get for their additional year of experience. The CTA opposes those proposals.I Arkansas Democrat (gazette FRIDAY, JUNE3O, 1995 Arbitrator selected to help teachers, LRSD come to terms BY CYNTHIA HOWELL playgrounds and lunchrooms. Democrat-Gazette Educabon Wnter jjjg school district is trying Officials for the Little Rock to cut as much as $9 million in School District and the Classexpenses for the year. The room Teachers Association will school board has already voted turn to a federally appointed to eliminate a deputy superinfact-finder today for help in re- tendents position, close two el- solving disputes in teacher contract negotiations. Francis X. Quinn, an arbitrator based in Tulsa, will listen to arguments by the district and the CTA at a session set for 9 a.m. ementary schools and turn over transportation to a private company. One of the first items to be Most of the contract disputes center on the districts efforts to cut discussed will be an extension of the 1994-95 teachers con- expenses. District tract, Frank Martin, CTA execu- officials have orooosed tive director, said Thursday. proposea The contract for the districts shortening the school more than 1,500 teachers is to expire today, the last day of the districts fiscal year. Most of the contract disputes center on the districts efforts to cut expenses. District officials have proposed shortening year by two days and cutting employee salaries accordingly. The Federal Mediation and the school year by two days and Conciliation Service appointed cutting employee salaries ac- Quinn at the request of Martin cordingly. and Brady Gadberry, the dis- Also, the district has offered tricts director of labor rela- no incremental increases to tions. teachers for their added year of After hearing the presenta- experience. In the past, most tions today, Quinn will have teachers got incremental in- about 20 days to prepare sug- creases of about 3 percent a gestions for resolving the dis- year. Other disagreements con- agreements. The bargaining groups can cern the districts proposals to accept Quinns recommenda- cap health insurance benefits tions, reject them or use them for employees and to require as a basis for further negotia- teachers to handle some supervision of students in such areas tions. Quinn charges $600 a day for outside their classrooms as his arbitration services.Arkansas Democrat TUESDAY, JULY 18, 1995 Copyright O little Rock Newspapers, Inc, Fact finder recommends teacher raise, shorter year BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Denxiciat-Gazette Education Writer nonbinding. The district or the CTA can accept reject or modify A fact finder hired to help re- them. solve contract disputes between Its basically a good recommen- the Little Rock School District and dation, said Brady Gadberry, the the teachers union has recommended that most teachers get a districts director of labor rela- tions. As with any arbitrators decision, there are things you like better than others. Frank Martin, executive direc- pay raise this year for their extra year of teaching experience. But Francis X. Quinn of Tulsa ------------ also recommended a two-day re- tor of the CTA, said he was pieced duction in the 192-day teacher that Quinn recommended continu- work year, which could partly off- ing the incremental pay raise that set any raise. teachers traditionally get for an exRepresentatives of the school tra year of experience. He also district and the Classroom Teach- liked toat Quinn recommended ers Association will meet at 1 p.m. $810 stipends for many of the dis- Wednesday to decide whether tricts most senior teachers. Quinns recommendations can be But the reduction of the fyro used to settle the 1995-96 teacher contract Quinns reconunendations are days will give us some trouble, Martin said, questioning whether it See TEACHERS, Page 5B Teachers schedule and are ineligible for an the shorter year. automatic experience increment A teacher at the top of the Little  Continued from Page 1B would be legal. Quinn also recom- experience but less than hours mended reducing the pay rate for of credit above the bachelors deteachers who choose six periods gree. But Quinn omitted from the pool Rock salary schedule earns $41,051 of teachers eligible for the stipend a year. If Quinns recommendation those who have at least 16 years of was adopted, the teacher would per day instead of five. The district earn an $810 stipend but would lose $427.60 if two work days were cut A beginning teacher who earns has paid teachers 20 percent of those teachers could get paid more their daily rate of pay for the sixth by acquiring more education. The class. -Acting on an administrative district traditionally pays teachers Gadberry said Quinn felt that $20,262 would get the $810 incre- ment but would lose $211.06 if the two days were cut The overriding assumptions in proposal, Quinn dropped that pay not only for their years of expert- this fact-finding were that the 1995- rate to 10 percent. Quinn issued his written recommendations Friday after hearing ence, but also for their extra edu- 96 expenditures would not exceed cational hours. Quinn accepted the districts projected 94-95 expenditures, Quinn wrote. However, we con- presentations from district and proposal that the teacher work eluded, based on the evidence subunion representatives June 30. The year be cut by the two days in No- mitted, that a modest salary in- CTA and the district had asked the vember when teachers attend the Federal Mediation and Concilia- Arkansas Education Association tion Service for a fact finder to rec- convention. In the past, schools ficiency. crease was possible and necessary to maintain morale and teacher ef ommend a resolution to their con- were closed to students on those tract disputes. Most of the disputes days, but teachers were paid to center on money and the districts participate in training programs. efforts to cut up to $9 million in expenses for the coming school year. Martin and Gadberry said Monday they would check with Quinn to The teachers who give their life of service of education to this student generation should be re^ warded on a par with others who render valuable service to the com- Specifically, Quinn recommend- make sure he intended that the two munity, he concluded. ed that the teacher salary schedule AEA days be unpaid days, because remain unchanged but that each teacher move one step on the schedule, making teachers eligible for an $810 increment. Last years teacher contract exit was only implied and not written pired June 30, leaving teachers, in the recommendation. who are supposed to return to work _ The district hopes to save about in mid-AugusL without a contracC- $700,000 this year by reducing the The CTA has a policy against' Teachers who have 17 to 20 work year by two days for teachers years of experience and 24 or more hours of college credit beyond a and three days for administrators. teachers working without a coU'' tract Gadberry said the district is Five employee groups, including continuing to honor the terms of bachelors degree should also get bus drivers, aides, custodians, se- the expired contract in hopes of. an $810 stipend, Quinn said. Those curity officers and food service teachers are at the top of the salary workers would be unaffected by quickly reaching a settlement on a new contractArkansas Democrat (j^azdte  FRIDAY, JULY 28, 1995   LR teachers association will meet to discuss contract negotiations several years ago stating that they programs sponsored by the Arkan- _  ._! __TT, At A MM A/tAn Little Rock Classroom Teach- several years ago stating that they prop-ms sponsoreo oy me mi ,'ScE will report .III not work without a contract sak ^Kat.on l''me''HS's?h.!'oDtrTc^^ \"Tb\"o ncgotlntloB teams met yeuby twdays and the admuiis- i  Mmbe? Eip mcS a 5 WeSwSThurrfa, and will mUe i Sn o\" Aug sTn ttie Pa'rkview resume tnte at.a m. today ld save the district about TrK5CT\"ve ad'tt.\"lsS Sd k Ser this month, a tederally director, said Thursday the meet- teams were optimistic that a r SC'i'wOTkdOTbreteed :5tS'rEe::ua^,'?B^^^^ ssasscSte^ErSiucEts ?uSS-Wd.he SsVeS^ S'E:\ns*'%e7cSeS\"bSith: S\nrrlddS. Lfc im?mh?r?SS u2 proposal as their salarms also experience. The ejsenence inc,^ the meeting to decide what to do if would be reduced by two days, there is no contract settlement by proAug 14 the day that most teachers posal are days in November that are scheduled to return to work schools are traditionally closed so for the 1995-96 school year. that teachers can attend profes- CTA members passed a policy s------ --------------- The two negotiating teams met year by two days and the adminis- Wednesday and Thursday and will trative work year by three days resume talks at 10:30 a.m. today. v. c Jd  \"\" Spokesmen for both the CTA $7(W,0(W. ...................... and the school district said the teams were optimistic that a set- The days affected by the pro- ment amounts to $810 per teacher. District officials said they would accept the fact-finders recommendations, but the CTA balked, say- uiai VC. -__________ W that they were being asked to sional conferences and training fund their own salary increases.L Arkansas Democrat C^azcttc SATURDAY, JULY 29 iqqc\nCoDvnm, o Unio Teachers slate contract session The Little Rock School District and the Classroom Teachers Association will try to reach a contract settlement Thursday morning, just hours before teachers meet at 5 p.m. to decide whether to return to work without contracts. Brady Gadberry, the districts chief negotiator, said after a bargaining session Friday that the negotiating teams appeared close to an agreement and he hopes the talks next week will produce a settlement that the CTA officials can carry to their membership meeting for approval. The teams will present their best and final offers at the Thursday session, Gadberry said. He is optimistic that those proposals will be so similar that a tentative agreement can be reached quickly. The main contention between the teams is a district proposal to discontinue paying teachers for attending two days of professional conferences and training sessions sponsored each November by the Arkansas Education Association. Those two days have been considered work days for teachers in past years, although students do not attend classes on those days. Other unresolved issues include new provisions on enforcing school district discipline policies and an anticipated increase this year in employee insurance premiums.THURSDAY, AUGUST 3, 2000  District, teachers sign tentative pact for coming 3 years LR School Board, union members may OK contract with 7.25% and 5% raises next week BY CYNTHIA HOWELL ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE Most Little Rock School District teachers can expect total pay increases of 7.25 percent this year and more than 5 percent in each of the next two years, according to a tentative contract signed Wednesday by district and teacher leaders. The three-year agreement must be ratified by the Little Rock School Board and the membership of the Classroom Teachers Associ- perience increment traditionally paid eligible teachers for their additional year of work - *** As a result, a majority of teach- ation to become final. That is expected to happen next week. The teachers association has scheduled a membership meeting at 5 p.m. Tuesday, the day before most teachers start work for the 200001 school year. The meeting to act on the contract proposal will be at the Arkansas Education Association building, 1500 W. 4th St. As of late Wednesday, the School Board had not scheduled a time to consider the newly inked agreement but has a special meeting set for 530,p.m. Tuesday on a different matter. 'P Brady Gadberry, special assis- tant to die superintendent and the ence will be $50,363, compared districts chief negotiator, said the   * three-year proposal is significant because it will contribute to longterm stability and enable the district and community to concen- trate on attaining release from . crease percentages as nonrestrict- federal court monitoring of the districts desegregation efforts. The districts 1998 Revised Desegregation and Education Plan establishes procedures for court release by next June. Wednesdays agreement is actually Uie second three-year pact between the district and the teachers union, Gadberry said. But the first agreement, in 1989-90, was concluded after teachers went for almost an entire school year without a contract. As a result, the first year of the three-year contract was retroactive. According to terms of the agreement, all teachers will get a 4.25 percent pay increase this year and a minimum increase of 2.875 percent in each of the next two years, which amounts to a 10 percent raise over three years. The annual raises are coupled with the average 3.03 percent ex- ers should see a 7.25 percent increase this year and well over 5 , percent in the next two years. ' Teachers who have the most experience in the district and have reached the top of the salary schedule are ineligible for the 3.03 percent increment. But they do get a $1,500 stipend. -*  TTie salary for a beginning teacher with a bachelors degree will go from $23,135 in 1999-2000, to $24,118 this year. The top salary for a teacher with 20 years of experi- with $48,372 last year. .. The contract proposal establishes a minimum salary increase for the second and third years.but also establishes a procedure'to in- ed revenues to the district increase. Gadberry said there was a strong probability that pay increases will exceed the minimum. The contract language takes into accoimt the possibility of teacher raises enacted by state lawmakers when the Arkansas General Assembly convenes in January. Gov. Mike Huckabee and others have See TEACHERS, Page 5B V s 7: i )* iit' Icn, a __ f Arkansas Democrat-Gazette/STEVE KEESEE Teachers  Continued from Page IB indicated that raising teacher salaries will be a priority during the legislative session. The Little Rock contract proposal includes adjustments in the salaiy schedule, beginning with the 2001-02 school year, as a way to raise beginning salaries and entice new teachers to the district. According to the proposal, salaries paid first-time teachers this year will be eliminated for 2001-02. This years salaries for all second-year teachers will become the first-year salaries in 2001-02 and a new second-year salaiy level has been developed. Players in the contract negotiations, which began in earnest last June, were reluctant Wednesday to reveal the terms of the proposal until after it could be presented to the teachers. that she felt very positive about the The teams used Francis X. Quinn, a labor relations specialist from Oklahoma, on both Tuesday and Wednesday to complete tlie negotiations. Quinn has been employed by the district and the association at different times in the past as an arbitrator or fact finder in employee and contract disputes. He was in the Little Rock School District this week for matters not related to the contract negotiations when he was called on : to help, Gadberry said. Other changes in the contract for this year include the creation of a sick bank that will enable em-proposal and deferred other com- pigyees to donate unused sick days ments until after next week^s mem-\n    .......... bership meeting. Gadberry released the pro-posed terms to the Arkansas to be used by other critically ill employees. Signing in Heather Passmore stands beside her children, Emily, 4, Eric, 6, and Andrew, 8, at Little Rock's Carver Magnet Elementary School during registration Wednesday. Registration for all Little Rock School District schools will go on3rom 10 a.m.-7 p.m.today. The two older children will be first- and third-graders. Classes start Tuesday at Mabelvale, Woodruff and Stephens. Other Little Jtock schools start classes Aug. 21. and no experience in 2001-02 will, be $25,803. A second-year teacher newspaper submitted a Freedom of Information Act request for the with the same degree will earn $26300. A third year teacher will earn $26,796. In the final year of the contract, . information. The states Freedom of Information Act states that all records maintained in public offices or by public employees with-the beginning salary will be $26,835, i n t-j ie sco.p e of their emplo-y me,nt the second-year salary will be ure presunied to be public records. $27351, and the third-year teacher And according to the law, any citi-with a bachelors degree will be ^^n of the state may inspect and paid ^,687. The top salary in the coPV public records. district that year will be $53,777. Gadberry said his reluctance to Players in the contract negotia- release the information was in def-tions, which began in earnest last erence to the union. June, were reluctant Wednesday to The negotiating teams met most reveal the terms of the proposal of Tuesday and for a few hours until after it could be presented to Wednesday to find acceptable lan-the teachers. guage on the restructuring of the Clementine Kelley, president of salary schedule beginning with the teachers association, said only 2001-2002. , Arkansas Democrat | FRIDAY, AUGUST 4, 1995 CoDvritfrt O.Uttle Rock Newsoaoera. Inc. Teachers send negotiators back to table with orders to hang tough on contract BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazette Education Writer Members of the Little Rock Classroom Teachers .Association sent their officers back to the contract negotiating table Thursday with instructions not to accept less than current benefits and salaries. The CT.A and the Little Rock School District are negotiating a 1995-96 teacher contract. The major remaining hurdle is a proposal to shorten the teacher work year by two days, with an accompanying cut in salaries. We wanted to get a feel from the membership about whether there was room for compromise. We got a resounding no.'  Frank .Martin, executive director of the Classroom Teachers Association, said after the closed union meeting. Their message to us was that they have given and given and given, and they dont want to give any more. About 300 teachers attended the late-aftemoon meeting at Parkview Magnet High School. Martin said. About 85 percent of the districts almost 2,000 teachers belong to the CTA. The negotiating teams have another week to reach an agreement. Teachers, now without contracts, are scheduled to begin work Aug. 14. Students return Aug. 21. The CTA has a no-contract, no-work policy. Martin said he expects the district and CTA negotiating teams to meet again soon, possibly as early as today. The teams met briefly Thursday morning, when they were scheduled to present their best and final offers. But the CTA team wanted to delay making an offer until it had a chance to confer with the membership. .As a result, the district team decided to withhold its offer until the CTA was prepared. Brady Gadberry, the districts chief negotiator, refused to disclose the terms of the districts offer. But he did say the offer represented a significant change from the districts previous positions and should move the parties close to a settlement. A federally appointed factfinder called in by the teams last month recommended giving most teachers an incremental pay increase of $810 for their additional year of teaching experience. But he also recommended the two-day work-year reduction, which would cost teachers $220 to $447. While the district was willing to accept the fact-finders recommendations. the CTA balked, saying that teachers would end up paying their own increases through the two-day loss. Those two days are the ones when teachers attend professional conferences and training sessions sponsored by the .Arkansas Education Association in November. Martin said teachers objected Thursday to having district-paid health insurance premiums capped in exchange for keeping the two workdays. The district and the state pay the premiums, but the district recently was told those costs will increase this year by as much as $250,000.Arkansas Democrat [ TUESDAY, AUGUST 8,1995 Copvrifjht  Little Rock Newspepers. Inc. M I 11111 ! rOll % V? i iiriss? Arkansas Democial-GazeMe/STEVE KEESEE administration office at 810 W. Markham St. while district and union officials tried to negotiate a contract. NEGOTIATIONS STALL  Qordon McIntyre, a teacher al Brady Elementary School, makes his position plain as he and about 30 fellow Little Rock teachers picket outside Flap over picketers cancels contract talks BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democfftt-Gazetle EdtJcaHon Writer Contract negotiations between quiet, the Little Rock School District terview in a room off the lobby. Gadberry asked the teachers to be Though the leachers were weland the Classroom Teachers Asso- c--o-m---e- t-o-- -s-i t in the lobby. Gadberi.y. ciation ended before they got said he asked them to take their started Monday, thanks to a confrontation over picketing teachers them, he said. in the Administration Building signs outside. That upset some of Frank Martin. CTA executive lobbv. director, said the organization s The negotiating teams will try again today to bargain, as dead-line. s for reaching a settlement ap proach. The CTA has a member ....... ship meeting at 4:30 p.m. Thursday against continuing the talks lor at Hall High School to ratify a con- -' tract proposal or decide what to do if there is no contract by next Monday  the day most teachers nothing, Martin .said, arc supposed to report to work..................................... . ....... Mondays dispute centered on the picketing teachers. The CTA liad organized about 30 members to picket outside the Administration Building while contract talks took place on the building's third negotiating team became angry about the lobb.v exchange and asked Gadberry to apologize, but he didn't. The C'l'A team decided the day. District administrators overreacted and made a big to-do about If we were going to storm the Bastille, we would do it wiUi more than 30 people.\" Martin said. Despite the dispute and the escalating tensions between the district and the CTA, Gadberry said Boor. Hot, humid weather forced some of the teachers indoors at 2 p.m. for water and a chance to cool off. he is optimistic that the teams can reach an agreement. Martin said the side issue.s arc distracting to the contract talks, but the teams still have time to reach a settlement. Brady Gadberry, the districts The teams arc to meet again at chief negotiator, said the teachers 9 a.iii. today. Teachers are expcct-were noisy and disturbed a job in- eedd ttoo rreessuumee ppiicckkeettiinngg.. 2B  FRIDAY, AUGUST 9. 1996 LR teachers warn district that strike may be imminent BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazette Education Wnter With Monday looming as the first day of work for Little Rock teachers, , union leaders warned the school board Thursday that the districts last salary offer in contract negotiations wont be acceptable, This puts us in a very, verj' dangerous position, Frank Martin, executive director of the Classroom Teachers .Association, told board members Thursday night as he reminded them of the unions longstanding 'no-contract, no-work policy. '.The last best offer that was made to us. in the opinion of my team and my executive board, will be insufficient to get ratified by the membership, Martin told the board. Union leaders are planning a membership meeting this weekend to d^ide exactly how to proceed if there is no contract. Most of the dis- tricSs more than 1,500 teachers are supposed to report to work Monday for.-Jhe new school year. Students are5cheduled to start classes a week later, on Aug. 19. want to remind you that we ar^'not advocating or looking for trouble. Martin said. We have had enOiigh crises in the 12 years that I haydbeen here to last us more than a d^ple of lifetimes. ^iven the good will that has beeji built up in this community, it wouid be an absolute disaster to be priced in a position of having to disrupt the services of the schools to the-students. jtertin asked the board to expand the boundaries in which dis- trietiadministrators are working to seftib the 1996-97 contract. He said it appeared that the districts negotiating team had little authority to bargain over salaries and other money issues. But Dr. \"Vic Anderson, the assistant superintendent overseeing day-to-day district operations in the absence of a superintendent, said administrators are acting appropriately, given district finances, 'Our work force is very impor- , tant to us, Anderson added, We ! value them greatly. We want all our j employees to be satisfied with the i best package that we can provide to i them. We also have a responsibility j to leave the district in a financially j sound condition. We can't give away i that we do not have to revenue give.' Teachers initially sought a 5 percent across-the-board raise, plus cent aLTus5-uie-uu\u0026lt;uu loiac, piuo the incremental raises that some  teachers get for each additional year of experience. Representatives of the two negotiating teams declined Thursday to give any specifics about the districts most recent offer. Skip Rutherford, a public relations company executive who serves with Anderson on the team that is supervising the districL assured the board that administrators are working to resolve the contract disputes. No one in this city wants a work stoppage, Rutherford said. But he said that administrators have to be concerned about the districts future. What we do in August of 1996 may force a school board in August 1997 or August 1998 to make some very painful cuts out of very important programs, Rutherford said.IjVrkansas Democrat THURSDAY, AUGUST 10,1995 \"      IV, .CoovTiffht  Little Rock Newspapers, Inc. LR teachers, district talk into night BY CYNTHIA HOWELL ..... .......................-- AND SANDRA COX Democral-Qazette Staff Writers Negotiating teams representing the Little Rock School District and the Classroom Teachers Association continued talks late Wednesday in an effort to reach a contract Without disclosing details, Marwithout disclosing details. Mar- .solved. The teams have worked con tin said the association had offered sisteiitly to find ways around the its last proposal. settlement and avert a union vote today on a possible teacher strike. Frank Martin, CTA executive director, said he thought the two We think we can make a settlement, he said. The C'JA has set a membership meeting for 4:30 p.m. today at Hall High School. Teachers are expected to either vote on a settlement agreement or decide what to do if hurdles, he said. there is no contract by the time they  . . are supposed to report to work groups were \"relatively close to a Monday. settlement. yiie established a no con- Gadberry and Martin refused to reveal the terms of the proposals. The teams have been negotiating for much of the summer. In July, a federally appointed fact finder recommended a settlement that called for the district to pay teachers an extra $810 for their extra year of work experience. He also ei-s attend professional conferences . and training sessions sponsored by' the Arkansas Education Association. The Little Rock School District has about 2,000 teachers. About 85 percent of the teachers belong to the CTA. As of 10:40 p.m., the two groups were still meeting behind closed doors at the district Administration Building. recommended cutting the two workdays  which would mean cuts in salary ranging from .$200 to rp. .. , , MOO -- and reducing the pay for The negotiating teams began teachers who teach six periods a meeting shortly afier 1 p.m............................. Wednesday, prepared to go until midnight or later if needed to reach tract, no-work policy several years ago. But about 9:30 p.m., after the association took a dinner break lasting more than an hour, Frank Martin, CTA executive director, said the group and the district were still beriy, chief negotiator for wrestling over two issues: proposals ....................... to cap employee insurance benefits and eliminate two workdays. a settlement. p.m. Earlier in the day. Brady Gad the school district, said he hoped an agreement would be reached, but stubborn issues remained to be re- day instead of the traditional five. The school district was willing to accept the fact finders report. But the CTA balked, saying that by cutting the two workdays, they were paying for their own incremental raises. The workday.s at issue are the two day-s in November when teach-Arkansas Democrat ((jazeltcJ FRIDAY, AUGUST 11.1995 LR teachers wrap up $810, new contract BY SUSAN ROTH AND CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazette Education Writers Little Rock teachers have a new contract, four days before most return to school for the 1995- 96 year. And in a year when the district had to close a $9 million budget gap, they managed to keep all 192 workdays, fully paid health insurance and step increases of $810 for all teachers. The increases are for stepping up a year in employment but normally stop after a number of years. The district had sought to cut the step increases and two days from the teacher contract to save more than $1 million. Administrators also tried to cap the health CTA  Continued from Page 1B Tied the settlement after only 15 minutes behind closed doors. Frank Martin, executive director of the teachers union, said he believed that the teachers quickly approved the pact because they  knew we would make no great progress this year. The teachers initially asked for a 5 percent raise besides the $810 step increment across the board. The school district, meanwhile, proposed no raise.s or increments for the teachers. Instead, the district would have cut tlieir pay by reducing the school year by two days to 190. A federally appointed fact-finder recommended last month that the district pay all teachers the $810 step increase but cut the two work- ' insurance plan: collectively teachers would have had to pay an extra $200,000 for insurance. Union officials saw the settlement as a clear victory. Administrators and school board members viewed it as a mixed bag  some gains but losses on some of big-ticket items. The negotiating teams, which started talks in February, tentatively agreed to the settlement just before midni^t Wednesday, \"rhe new contract is retroactive to July 1. We had a real show of support from the membership, said Betty Mitchell, president of the Classroom Teachers Association, after the teachers voted 'Thursday afternoon. 'The message was clear Dont give an inch. As in any negotiations, both sides got some of what they wanted and left the bargaining table wishing they had gotten a few more things, Brady Gadberry, the districts chief negotiator, told school board members Thursday evening as he asked them to approve the agreement By a 54) vote, the board gave it the nod with little discussion. At the teachers meeting in Hall High School auditoriiun, about 350 members of the 1,47^ member CTA unanimously rati- See CTA, Page 5B days. The district liked the recommendation, but the CTA objected. Union officials were particularly pleased that teachers at the top of the salary schedule would also receive the ^10. Top-level teachers earned $41,061 last year. Tliey received no increment or pay raise last year. The teachers did agree to two cuts proposed by the district. Junior and senior high teachers who teach six classes every day instead of the standard five will receive an extra 10 percent stipend, down from 20 percent. Teachers who lose preparation time because they must travel between schools will receive a maximum of $2,000. They used to receive a stipend amounting to 20 percent of their salaries. Those two items wilt save the district $150,000, officials said. Partly as a result of the settle- ment, the district will draw on a $20 million state desegregation loan to cover its expenses this year. U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright, who monitors the districts compliance with its desegregation plan, has objected in the past to using the nonrecurring loan ftinds to finance recurring expenses. IArk,ansas Democrat (gazelle J _ MONDAY, AUGUST 12, 1996 LR teachers ro leaders: Keep talking .^ay raises, insurance .\u0026lt;ey sticking points BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazerte tducation Wrner Members of the Little Rock Tlassroom Teachers Association .iirected their representatives Sunday to continue negotiating vith school district officials over a 1996-97 teacher contract and re-oort back to the membership Thursday. About 250 teachers marked heir last day of summer vacation Sunday afternoon by attending the closed Classroom Teachers Association meeting in the Hall High School media center. Most of the districts teachers will return to work today to prepare for the See TEACHERS, Page 3B Teachers I 1 A 4 1^ Forest Heights Junior High School teachers Patricia Wilkerson (right center) and Meny Zakrzewski (left center) discuss contract  Continued from Page 1B start of school Aug. 19. We wanted to give teachers the status of negotiations,\" said Frank Martin, Classroom Teachers Association executive director. They directed us to go back to the table to get the best settlement we can get.\" The teachers also instructed union leaders to establish a crisis committee, which is routinely formed when tensions in the contract negotiations escalate. The committee supports the union negotiating team in ways ranging from painting signs for informational picket lines to communicating with the membership and the public. Negotiating teams for the Classroom Teachers Association and Little Rock School District met almost everj day last week, but broke for the weekend despite union objections. The teams are scheduled to resume talks at 4 p.m. today. We'd like to get this wrapped up by Wednesday, Martin said, adding that the union membership will meet again at 4:30 p.m. Thursday at Hall for another update. Thursday is also the day inter- Robert.s starts work, adding a new player to the negotiations process. The Classroom Teachers Association has a standing no-contract. no-work policy, which is generally interpreted to mean teachers won't work when schools open for students if the employees do not have a contract. Little Rock teachers have gone on strike only once, in 1987, but have teetered on the brink in other years. 5 V I TS, 'tSCY im Superintendent Dr. Don ri ArXansas Democral-Gazene/BENJAMIN KRA demands Sunday pnor to a meeting at Hall High School. Abe 250 teachers from the Little Hock School District pardcipated. assume at least a share of the cost of the premiums for individual insurance coverage, a cost the district has heretofore paid entirely. Teachers said Sunday that they feared any raises they get will be offset by the cost of the insurance. Another issue deals with providing stipends for senior teachers. Last year, because no across-the- board raises were paid and the senior teachers were ineligible for an incremental raise, the Martin said the union team is employees got an $810 stipend, prepared to negotiate until the The district team has proposed start of school next Monday to get paying that same stipend, but a settlement. over two years' time, resulting in The 1995-96 teacher contract the teachers getting only about expired June 30. $400 each year. Union and school district offi- Sundays union meeting was cials have declined to reveal de- primarily informational. Howev-tails of their contract talks. But, teachers who attended the meeting Sunday indicated that the district is offering an across-the-board 2 percent raise plus the incremental increases many teachers traditionally get for their additional year of experience. The increment is between 2 and 3 percent, but as many as 400 of the districts most experienced teachers er, teachers expressed frustration over the lack of a contract and the possibility they will not get satisfactory raises. Weve had more superintendents in the last five years than we have had raises, quipped one teacher as she left the meeting. Once the two teams reach a tentative settlement, the agree-ment must be ratified by both the have reached the top of the pay Classroom Teachers Association scale and are ineligible for the incremental increases. One of the sticking points in the negotiations is insurance. membership and the Little Rock School board. The district has more than 1,500 teachers, the majority of teachers said Sunday. The district whom are Classroom Teachers team is proposing that teachers Association members. Arkaniias Democrat FRIDAY. AUGUST 16, 1996  3B LR school year wont be tardy: Teacher contract talks settled BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazette Education Wnter The Little Rock School District and its teachers averted a possible strike next week by agreeing Thursday to a contract that gives teachers a 2.46 percent across-the-board raise plus an $830 increase for each additional year of experience. Bargaining teams representing the district and the Classroom Teachers Association negotiated all night Wednesday. They arrived at a tentative agreement just minutes before an association membership meeting at 4:30 p.m. Thursday at Hall High. Several hundred members quickly ratified the agreement as did Little Rock School Board members a few minutes later. Some teachers will get salary increases of almost $2,000 under the new contract \"This will get the school year off to an excellent start Betty Mitchell, teacher association president said. \"This is the first time in three years that teachers have gotten a raise.' she added, although most teachers did get step increases for their years of experience during that time. All in all. its a very good package. Brady Gadberry, the districts director of labor relations, told the school board Thursday. Negotiations on the contract began last spring but intensified last week as the beginning of school year drew closer. The teacher association has a standing \"no-con- tract, no-work policy that threatened to keep schools closed Monday. The bargaining teams began negotiating Wednesday at 9:30 a.m. ____ and kept at it until 7:30 a.m. Thurs- payment by the district day, when they declared an impasse. After lunch, administrators asked to meet again. The teams ________ reached a one-year, tentative each employee for the next two agreement about 4:15 p.m. years. If the premium is less than The major points in the talks centered on salary increases and insurance. In the past, the district and the state have paid each employees insurance premium for individual coverage  $155 per person this past year. The districts negotiating team initially wanted the employees to assume part of the insurance costs, but the teacher association insisted on 100 percent As a result of Thursdays agreement, the district will apply S164 a month to insurance coverage for the monthly allowance, the employee can apply the excess to coverage for a spouse or dependents. If any employee has insurance from a source other than the district and does not want to participate in any of the school insurance programs, he will get a $550 stipend. Also as part of the agreement the district and the teachers agreed to drop the districts longterm disability insurance coverage. That will save $533,000. which will be returned to the teacher salary fund. The agreement gives all teachers the 2.46 percent general raise. The beginning salary for a teacher-, with a bachelors degree will ba\u0026gt; S20.760 this year. The districts top.' salary will be $42,870 for teachers with a masters degree plus 36 ad-\nditional college hours and 21' - years of experience. Most teachers also will get $830\nfor each additional year of experi-' ence. Teachers at the top of the salaiy schedule and ineligible for that experience increment will get an $810 stipend! -Also, a teacher may get $100 a semester for perfect attendance,-. Teachers with perfect attendance, all vear are eligible for a total of $300.Arkansas Den: ?crat (gazette  TUESDAY, AUGUST 25,1998  ( LR teachers, district narrow differences over pay raises Union, schools may reach tentative accord today, director says BY CYNTHIA HOWELL ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE Differences over salary increases for teachers kept representatives of the Little Rock School District and the Classroom Teachers Association at the bargaining table late Monday. Teams negotiating a 1998-99 teacher contract traded proposals for more than nine hours as they worked into the night to reach a tentative agreement before a union membership meeting at 4:30 p.m. today at the Hall High School auditorium. The teams stood 1.5 percentage points apart on a salary agreement, representatives from the teams confirmed shortly before 11 p.m. Neither side would reveal details about the salary offers. Teachers had asked for a 7 per-  cent raise plus the traditional increment of 2.7 percent to 3 percent for their extra year of teaching experience. District officials have expressed a willingness to raise employee salaries but said they cant pay the increases until a federal court rules on the amount of money that the state must reimburse the district for past teacher retirement and health insurance. Classroom Martin, Frank Teachers Association executive director, said the teachers team will present the membership today with a tentative agreement or the districts final offer. The Classroom Teachers Association membership has rarely approved a district offer that lacks the Classroom Teachers Association negotiating teams stamp of approval. If it has no tentative agreement to present today, the teachers team will likely have to recommend alternatives to the membership. But no decisions about alternatives had come Monday. There has been no threat or discussion of a teacher strike. The teams have reached tentative agreements on parts of the contract. Brady Gadberry, the chief negotiator for the district, said the teams had agreed to insurance and stipend provisions. He said he wont describe the agreements until all negotiations are complete. Martin said the teams also had reached a consensus on contract language that would let a teacher appeal to a building or district committee if he thought a principal had failed to enforce student discipline. The Little Rock district the largest in the state, has about 1,800 teachers\nabout 85 percent belong to the association. Besides Martin, the teachers negotiating team includes Classroom Teachers Association President Grainger Led- I better and district teachers. Gadberrys team included the districts financial managers, principals and administrative representatives. 'The Little Rock School Board and the Classroom Teachers Association members must ratify any tentative agreement between the district and the Classroom Teachers Association.' Atluuisas Ueniocrat T^XlifrazclU' |  WEDNESDAY, AUGUS f 26. 1998 Teachers unhappy with raises send negotiators back to table UY CYN IJ llA HOWELL ARJGXNSAS nE.M(X KAI-GAZErii: Dissatisfied with a proposed 4.5 percent raise contingent on a federal court order, member.$ of the Little Ilock Classroom Teachers administrators in the district got raises of 10 percent or more earlier this Slimmer. 'rherc i.s no money in IkhkI and too many *ifs tied to (Ik* promises. teacher IJcmy Ne.sby said after the meeting. Nesby is a contiaclI l\u0026lt; alIlcIs' wiuthT school d*i.'s..t.r.i.c. t g*ocl*ia\u0026gt;tibnegr otefa tmhe. teachers union ne-icpresenlalives. Despite the lack of a contract agreement in what is teachers h,nue KOCK Association told their negotiating team Tuesday to resume 1998-99 The teachers reviewed the sala^ issue during a l'A-hour ......... vn,uu..,enuu5iaiK \"'^filing at Hall High School. They of any kind has been heanl of a asked their negotiating team to re-  port back to them within HI days. About 400 teachers attended district Uie private late-altemoon meeting. Afterward, several teachers grumbled about having to wait for deferred raises fon the second straiglit year when seven top-level third week of work, no serious talk job action, such as a strike. Representatives of the school and the association worked for almost 11 hours Monday to reach a tentative contract agreement before the teachers upion membership meeting. The Teachers \"Continued from Page 1B teams broke up shortly after midnight with tentative agreements on everything except salary and teacher workload. The teams differed by 1.5 percentage points on a salary increase. At the membership meeting, the teachers union team presented teachers with tlie dislricts and the associations respective final salary offers. The district's offer included: .  A total increase of 7.5 percent, consisting of a 4.5 percent across-the- board raise coupled with an increment of 2.7 percent to 3 percent traditionally paid teachers for their additional year of experience. The 4.5 percent increase, however, would be contingent on finalization of a federal court decision expected to reimburse the district for millions of dollars for teacher retirement and health insurance costs that the slate was supposed to pay.  A $1,180 stipend to the districts most experienced teachers who are no longer eligible for the cx- See TEACHERS, Page 3B I? ft if?: 1 V o I Little Rock sclioolleacliers Eleanor Colotnan (left) and Gait Delozier look over contract proposals before a teachers meeting Tuesday to discuss negotiations between the Afknusns Dcmocrnl-G.izclte.CHniS JOHNSON Classroom Teachers Association and the school district. The teachers voted to send their representatives back to the bargaining table. perience increment. would begin Oct. 1. Payment  An increase in the monthly insurance contribution from $164 to $178. beginning Sept. 15. That  would pay the premiums for two of the least expensive health plans available to individual employees.  An increase in the supplemental pay distributed to coaches and other teachers who take on extra duties, such as supervising tracurricular activities. ex- The amount of the increase, beginning this year, would mirror the percentage increase in the base salary. The teachers union salaiy proposal differs only in that it calls for pajinent of the 4.5 percent across-the-board raise plus an additional 1.5 percent if the reini- ' bursement of state fund.s for 1996- 1 98 exceeds $13.4 million. I All totaled, the teachers union . is seeking 6 percent plus the tra- ! ditional increment, as compared to the districts 4.5 percent plus the increment. In addition to tho salary proposals for this year, teachers employed by the district in 1997-98 will eventually get a retroactive 3 percent raise negotiated last school year but deferred until the district won its court case against the stale. As a result, many teachers could eventually see their nav increase by 10.5 percent this year. A beginning teacher would make $22,625 this year, $2,510 more than a beginning teacher last year, under the districts proposal and with the deferred 3 percent from last year. A teacher with 19 years of experience and a masters degree plus 30 hours would make $4,092 more than last year. Frank Marlin, executive director of the teacliers association, said Tuesday that the teachers want a better salary offer and theyre mad because they've had to wait for increases. But, he said, the two negotiating teams agree on the increase in the insurance benefit, the supplemental pay increase and the experience increment. T'he teams also have tentatively agreed on new contract language that makes teachers and principals equally responsible for enforcing student discipline policies. A discipline supcrvisoiy committee will be established with the authority to review disci-plinaiy actions taken by princi-pahs that are inconsistent with a school's discipline plan and district policy. We think weve put an exceptionally good offer on tlie table already, Brady Gadbeny. the districts chief negotiator, said after the association meeting, rm not sure I understand how wo can put anything else on the table, but 1 don't want to foreclose on the possibility of a scUlcincnt agreement. Gadbeny said this years offer of 7.5 percent is belter than last year's package of 725 percent, including the deferred 3 percent, that teachers adopted. Iliis year's benefits offer includes an 8.6 percent increase in the district's contribution to employee Insurance preiniunis, he said. There is no schedule for ob-taining a decision on (he reimbursement of state funds to Uie^ Little Rock district. A federal peals court ruled in July that the-district was entitled to the money. The appeals court directed U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright to decide exactly how much money is owed to tlic district. The stale has proposed a formula by which Little Rock would  get about $15 million. At the same time, the stale has asked the 8tb- U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals- to recon.sider its order. :  Arkansas Democrat '^(iS^azcll^  WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 2/1^^ Teachers to get word on LR contract talks The Little Rock Classroom teachers Association has scheduled a membership meeting for L30 p.m. Thursday at the Hall High School auditorium to consider the outcome of negotiations over a 1998-99 teachers' contract. Contract negotiations scheduled for Tuesday afternoon between Little Rock School District administrators and the teachers' association were postponed until this afteimoon because a negotiator was ill. Last week, the two bargaining teams tentatively agreed to virtually all provisions of a contract except salarv\nThe teams were 1.5 percentage points apart in talks over salan- increases. Teachers sought a 6 per- cent increase plus the traditional 3 percent given for an additional year of experience. The district offered 4.5 percent plus the experience increment. Both proposals hinged on the district receiving reimbursement 01 millions of dollars in state funds for 1996-98 shortfalls in the states contribution toward teacher re- tiiement and health insurance re- costs. The association has since changed its position and is asking for a 2 percent across-the-board salary- increase by Oct. 1 and a 4 percent increase later, when the district gets the state funding.I Arkansas Democrat T^djirtzclle ]  THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 3, 1993 District declares impasse Schools seek mediator to solve salary dispute BY CYNTHIA HOWELL AHKANSAS MCMlMKARiAZI: I! T. Representatives of the Little Rock School District declared an impasse Thursday in salaiy negotiations with the Classroom Teach- Impasse  Continued from Page 1B teacher retirement and health insurance costs for 1996-98. The 0.75 percent brings the possible raise to 5.25 percent. The district asked for the 107 percent reimbursement in federal court last month.  An increase in health insurance contributions, from $164 to $178 a month, and in the stipend paid teachers for extra duty. Coupled with the experience increment and contingent on the court order, the district is offering a total increase of 7.5 percent to 8.25 percent. Gadberiy said that until the impasse is resolved, the district will operate under the terms of last years contract and will proceed , ... , ., ,, with plans to pay teachers the tra- ers Association and said they ditional 2 7 percent to 3 percent in- ,.,i,i ....11 p ii r.  r,...i experience. Teachers at mediator. the top of the salary schedule who Distiict teachers will consider are ineligible for that increment the latest development in tlie 1998- will get a stipend of $980, just as 99 teacher contract tatks at an as- they did last year. sociation membership meeting set The district also will continue for 4:30 p.m. today at Hall High last years payment of $164 a month would call for help from a federal School. Frank Martin, executive director of the association, said district olTicials declared an impasse after the association asked for a 1.5 percent across the-board raise by Oct. 1, plus a 4..5 percent raise when the state reimburses the district for shortfalls in state funding. Coupled with the traditional increase for experience, the association is seeking a total pay increase of about 9 percent. Brady Gadberiy, the districts chief negotiator, said he was disappointed by the impasse. But tlie call for a mediator became necessary when the association team retreated from its earlier salary position to a more entrenched position, he said. Gadberiy said the distr ict cannot give teachers an across-the- board raise until the state reimburses it for 199G-98 teacher retirement and health insurance costs. The district is awaiting a federal court order on how the state debt to the district must be calculated. Also contingent on the court order is a 3 percent salaiy increase for teachers defeired from last year. The teniis of the districts last salaiy oiler included:  The traditional 2.7 percent to 3 percent increase for a teachers additional year of experience.  A $1,130 stipend to teachers at the top of the salaiy schedule who are ineligible for the experience increment.  A 4.5 percent across-the-board raise once the district gets the state funding.  An additional 0.75 percent raise if the district is awarded state funding equal to 107 percent of its See IMPASSE,Page 3B tentatively agreed on virtually every aspect of the contract except salary and a question of whether teachers must be paid extra to teach more than five class periods a day. The teams were 1.5 percentage points apart, with teachers seeking 6 percent and the district offering 4.5 percent. Both proposals hinged on receipt of the court-ordered state funding. The teachers team presented the district's offer to the association membership meeting Aug. 25. About 400 of the district's 1,800 | teachers attended and directed their team to resume negotiations. The existing teacher contract calls for a mediator if the two teams reach an impasse in contract talks. Martin and Gadbeny will write to the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Seivice for a list of potential mediators. Once a mediator is agreed on. that person will attempt to help the teams settle their disputes. If that fails, the contract provides for a federal fact finder, who would conduct a hearing on the disputed issues and within 20 days prepare a insurance premiums. Last week, the negotiating teams issues. I FRIDAY. SEPTEMBER 4, 1998 OB-J I I LR teachers association president resigns BY CYNTHIA HOWELL ARKANSAS UEMOIKAI-UAZE I I E Grainger Ledbetter, a longtime teacher union leader, is resigning as president of the Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association to work for the Labor Education Program at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock He announced his resignation, effective today, in a letter to teachers and repeated it at an association membership meeting Thursday during which teachers received a status report on efforts to negotiate a 1998-99 contract witli the Little Rock School District. Willie Givens, association vice president and head custodian at Central High School, will assume the presidents duties as prescribed in the associations constitution. Givens has been employed by the Little Rock School District for more than 23 years and has been active in the teachers association and Arkansas Education Association since 1983. It unclear Thursday was whether Givens would serve the full year remaining in Ledbetters two-year term. He said he expects to fulfill the term, but there was some talk among teachers about possibly calling a special election to select a teacher. That decision will be up to the associations executive board and its representative council. The Classroom Teachers Association has about 1,800 members, said Frank Martin, its executive director. As many as 800 are educational support personnel, including custodians, aides, bus drivers and security guards. Ledbetter, 41, a Little Rock School District employee since 1^1, will be a labor education specialist at UALR. The 25-year-old labor program is a division of the Institute for Economic Advancement and provides research, educational services and training programs for public and private-sector labor organizations and workers. Training sessions cover topics such as collective bargaining, stewardship, arbitration, labor and employment law and workplace safety. Ledbetter said his resignation was in no way the result of anger or frustration with the organization or the prolonged teacher contract negotiations this summer with school district officials. District officials declared an impasse in those contract talks earlier this week. A fed- oral mediator will be called in to assist the teams in reaching a settlement Im not resigning out of pique and Im not upset Ledbetter said. Its just tliat this is an opportunity that will allow me to spend more time with my family, continue union work, and I get to live in Little Rock. I had hoped to have a (teacher] contract signed, sealed and delivered before I took the new position, but that didnt tuni out to be possible. Ledbetter and his wife, Slieny CuiTy, have three young children and are part of a prominent Little Rock family. Uis father. Cal Ledbetter, a fonner state legislator, is a professor emeritus of political science at UALR. His motlier, Brownie Ledbetter, is a longtime community activist with the Arkansas Fairness Council, a tax reform organization. A junior high teacher, Ledbetter first seived as teacher association president in 1987-91. During his tenure, the teachers and bus drivers went on strike against tlie district. He then served two terms as president of the 17,006-member Arkansas Education Association before returning to the teachers association presidency last year. 1' Lcdbetter attended his last membership meeting Thureday afternoon at Hall Higli. He urged tlie approximately 250 teachers pre-, sent to give tlie mediation a chance i 1 to work. And he told them hebe\nlieved teachers will wind up witli' a.',  better financial settlement thaij the ' 7.5 percent- 8.25 percent raise\ntlie  district is offering. More than half.\nof the raise is contingent upon .the'' state paying the district milliops of\ndollars for 1996-98 shortfalls in I 11 teacher retirement and health in--\nsurancepayments.  . Teachers are seeking 9 percent . J increases for tlie year, including an  incremental raise for an additional : year of teaching experience. , i Ledbetter warned against a \" premature strike, saying that the- two negotiating teams are relatively close to an agreement and liave li long agreed to the use of media-  tion and fact finding should talks stall. t He criticized Superintendent': Les Camine for sending teachei's a J, letter earlier Thursday outlining:\nsome of the issues in the negotia- tions. He called tlie letter a clumsy attempt to influence teachers and said it could derail tlie negotiating . process. I' WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 16.1998  Arkansas Democrat (Bazcttc LR teachers, district select Tulsa mediator BY CYNTHIA HOWELL ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE Negotiators for the Little Rock School District and the Classroom Teachers Association have tentatively selected a Tulsa-based mediator to assist them in completing negotiations on the 1998-99 teacher contract Frank Martin, executive director of the Classroom Teachers Association, and Brady Gadberry, special as\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"vrc_pec_35853","title":"Commemorative monument to L. Francis Griffin, Farmville, Va., 1991","collection_id":"vrc_pec","collection_title":"Edward H. Peeples Prince Edward County (Va.) Public Schools","dcterms_contributor":["Peeples, Edward H. (Edward Harden), 1935-","James Branch Cabell Library. Special Collections and Archives","VCU Libraries"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Virginia, Prince Edward County, 37.2243, -78.44108","United States, Virginia, Prince Edward County, Farmville, 37.3021, -78.39194"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1991"],"dcterms_description":["Commemorative monument to L. Francis Griffin in front of Robert Russa Moton Museum, Farmville, Va.","37.2651527","-78.3991619","http://maps.google.com/maps?q=37.2912633,%20-78.3977735"],"dc_format":["image/tiff"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Edward H. Peeples Prince Edward County (Va.) Public Schools"],"dcterms_subject":["Historic monuments","Monuments--Virginia--Farmville--Pictorial works","Robert Russa Moton Museum (Farmville, Va.)","Griffin, L. Francis--Monuments--Pictorial works"],"dcterms_title":["Commemorative monument to L. Francis Griffin, Farmville, Va., 1991"],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["James Branch Cabell Library. Special Collections and Archives"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["https://digital.library.vcu.edu/islandora/object/vcu%3A35853"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted","This material is protected by copyright, and copyright is held by VCU. You are permitted to use this material in any way that is permitted by copyright. In addition, this material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). Acknowledgment of Virginia Commonwealth University Libraries as a source is required."],"dcterms_medium":["color negatives"],"dcterms_extent":["6 x 9 cm."],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"vrc_pec_35855","title":"Commemorative monument to L. Francis Griffin, Farmville, Va., 1991","collection_id":"vrc_pec","collection_title":"Edward H. Peeples Prince Edward County (Va.) Public Schools","dcterms_contributor":["Peeples, Edward H. (Edward Harden), 1935-","James Branch Cabell Library. Special Collections and Archives","VCU Libraries"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Virginia, Prince Edward County, 37.2243, -78.44108","United States, Virginia, Prince Edward County, Farmville, 37.3021, -78.39194"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1991"],"dcterms_description":["Commemorative monument to L. Francis Griffin in front of Robert Russa Moton Museum, Farmville, Va.","37.2651527","-78.3991619","http://maps.google.com/maps?q=37.2912633,%20-78.3977735"],"dc_format":["image/tiff"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Edward H. Peeples Prince Edward County (Va.) Public Schools"],"dcterms_subject":["Historic monuments","Monuments--Virginia--Farmville--Pictorial works","Robert Russa Moton Museum (Farmville, Va.)","Griffin, L. Francis--Monuments--Pictorial works"],"dcterms_title":["Commemorative monument to L. Francis Griffin, Farmville, Va., 1991"],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["James Branch Cabell Library. Special Collections and Archives"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["https://digital.library.vcu.edu/islandora/object/vcu%3A35855"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted","This material is protected by copyright, and copyright is held by VCU. You are permitted to use this material in any way that is permitted by copyright. In addition, this material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). Acknowledgment of Virginia Commonwealth University Libraries as a source is required."],"dcterms_medium":["color negatives"],"dcterms_extent":["6 x 9 cm."],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"vrc_pec_35856","title":"Commemorative monument to L. Francis Griffin, Farmville, Va., 1991","collection_id":"vrc_pec","collection_title":"Edward H. Peeples Prince Edward County (Va.) Public Schools","dcterms_contributor":["Peeples, Edward H. (Edward Harden), 1935-","James Branch Cabell Library. Special Collections and Archives","VCU Libraries"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Virginia, Prince Edward County, 37.2243, -78.44108","United States, Virginia, Prince Edward County, Farmville, 37.3021, -78.39194"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1991"],"dcterms_description":["Commemorative monument to L. Francis Griffin in front of Robert Russa Moton Museum, Farmville, Va.","37.2651527","-78.3991619","http://maps.google.com/maps?q=37.2912633,%20-78.3977735"],"dc_format":["image/tiff"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Edward H. Peeples Prince Edward County (Va.) Public Schools"],"dcterms_subject":["Historic monuments","Monuments--Virginia--Farmville--Pictorial works","Robert Russa Moton Museum (Farmville, Va.)","Griffin, L. Francis--Monuments--Pictorial works"],"dcterms_title":["Commemorative monument to L. Francis Griffin, Farmville, Va., 1991"],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["James Branch Cabell Library. Special Collections and Archives"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["https://digital.library.vcu.edu/islandora/object/vcu%3A35856"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted","This material is protected by copyright, and copyright is held by VCU. You are permitted to use this material in any way that is permitted by copyright. In addition, this material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). Acknowledgment of Virginia Commonwealth University Libraries as a source is required."],"dcterms_medium":["color negatives"],"dcterms_extent":["6 x 9 cm."],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"vrc_pec_35852","title":"Commemorative monument to L. Francis Griffin, Farmville, Va., 1991","collection_id":"vrc_pec","collection_title":"Edward H. Peeples Prince Edward County (Va.) Public Schools","dcterms_contributor":["Peeples, Edward H. (Edward Harden), 1935-","James Branch Cabell Library. Special Collections and Archives","VCU Libraries"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Virginia, Prince Edward County, 37.2243, -78.44108","United States, Virginia, Prince Edward County, Farmville, 37.3021, -78.39194"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1991"],"dcterms_description":["Commemorative monument to L. Francis Griffin in front of Robert Russa Moton Museum, Farmville, Va.","37.2651527","-78.3991619","http://maps.google.com/maps?q=37.2912633,%20-78.3977735"],"dc_format":["image/tiff"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Edward H. Peeples Prince Edward County (Va.) Public Schools"],"dcterms_subject":["Historic monuments","Monuments--Virginia--Farmville--Pictorial works","Robert Russa Moton Museum (Farmville, Va.)","Griffin, L. Francis--Monuments--Pictorial works"],"dcterms_title":["Commemorative monument to L. Francis Griffin, Farmville, Va., 1991"],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["James Branch Cabell Library. Special Collections and Archives"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["https://digital.library.vcu.edu/islandora/object/vcu%3A35852"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted","This material is protected by copyright, and copyright is held by VCU. You are permitted to use this material in any way that is permitted by copyright. In addition, this material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). Acknowledgment of Virginia Commonwealth University Libraries as a source is required."],"dcterms_medium":["color negatives"],"dcterms_extent":["6 x 9 cm."],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null}],"pages":{"current_page":709,"next_page":710,"prev_page":708,"total_pages":6797,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":8496,"total_count":81557,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"educator_resource_mediums_sms","items":[{"value":"lesson plans","hits":319},{"value":"teaching guides","hits":53},{"value":"timelines (chronologies)","hits":43},{"value":"online exhibitions","hits":38},{"value":"bibliographies","hits":15},{"value":"study guides","hits":11},{"value":"annotated bibliographies","hits":9},{"value":"learning modules","hits":6},{"value":"worksheets","hits":6},{"value":"slide shows","hits":4},{"value":"quizzes","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":40428},{"value":"StillImage","hits":35298},{"value":"MovingImage","hits":4529},{"value":"Sound","hits":3226},{"value":"Collection","hits":41},{"value":"InteractiveResource","hits":25}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"Peppler, Jim","hits":4965},{"value":"Phay, John E.","hits":4712},{"value":"University of Mississippi. Bureau of Educational Research","hits":4707},{"value":"Baldowski, Clifford H., 1917-1999","hits":2599},{"value":"Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission","hits":2255},{"value":"Thurmond, Strom, 1902-2003","hits":2077},{"value":"WSB-TV (Television station : Atlanta, Ga.)","hits":1475},{"value":"Newman, I. DeQuincey (Isaiah DeQuincey), 1911-1985","hits":1003},{"value":"The State Media Company (Columbia, S.C.)","hits":926},{"value":"Atlanta Journal-Constitution","hits":844},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":778}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"African Americans--Civil rights","hits":9445},{"value":"Civil rights","hits":8328},{"value":"African Americans","hits":5912},{"value":"Mississippi--Race relations","hits":5750},{"value":"Race relations","hits":5604},{"value":"Education, Secondary","hits":5083},{"value":"Education, Elementary","hits":4729},{"value":"Segregation in education--Mississippi","hits":4727},{"value":"Education--Pictorial works","hits":4707},{"value":"Civil rights demonstrations","hits":4440},{"value":"Civil rights workers","hits":3536}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966--Correspondence","hits":1888},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1815},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1709},{"value":"Baker, Augusta, 1911-1998","hits":1495},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1312},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1071},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":858},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":814},{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":719},{"value":"Mizell, M. Hayes","hits":674},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":626}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"name_authoritative_sms","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":2598},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1915},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1704},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1331},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1070},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":856},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":806},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":625},{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":605},{"value":"Snelling, Paula","hits":580},{"value":"Williams, Hosea, 1926-2000","hits":440}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Nobel Prize","hits":1769},{"value":"Ole Miss Integration","hits":1670},{"value":"Housing Act of 1961","hits":969},{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":853},{"value":"Memphis Sanitation Workers Strike","hits":366},{"value":"Selma-Montgomery March","hits":337},{"value":"Freedom Summer","hits":306},{"value":"Freedom Rides","hits":214},{"value":"Poor People's Campaign","hits":180},{"value":"University of Georgia Integration","hits":173},{"value":"University of Alabama Integration","hits":140}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":17987},{"value":"United States, Georgia, Fulton County, Atlanta, 33.749, -84.38798","hits":5437},{"value":"United States, Alabama, Montgomery County, Montgomery, 32.36681, -86.29997","hits":5151},{"value":"United States, Georgia, 32.75042, -83.50018","hits":4847},{"value":"United States, South Carolina, 34.00043, -81.00009","hits":4599},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":4328},{"value":"United States, Alabama, 32.75041, -86.75026","hits":3948},{"value":"United States, Mississippi, 32.75041, -89.75036","hits":2910},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":2580},{"value":"United States, Tennessee, Shelby County, Memphis, 35.14953, -90.04898","hits":2580},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":2536}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Georgia","hits":12823},{"value":"Alabama","hits":11313},{"value":"Mississippi","hits":10220},{"value":"South Carolina","hits":8493},{"value":"Arkansas","hits":4733},{"value":"Texas","hits":4399},{"value":"Tennessee","hits":3786},{"value":"Florida","hits":2602},{"value":"Ohio","hits":2403},{"value":"North Carolina","hits":1875},{"value":"New York","hits":1840}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1966","hits":10632},{"value":"1963","hits":10287},{"value":"1965","hits":10218},{"value":"1956","hits":9840},{"value":"1955","hits":9619},{"value":"1964","hits":9365},{"value":"1968","hits":9345},{"value":"1962","hits":9247},{"value":"1967","hits":8897},{"value":"1957","hits":8523},{"value":"1961","hits":8282},{"value":"1958","hits":8259},{"value":"1959","hits":8061},{"value":"1960","hits":7948},{"value":"1969","hits":7348},{"value":"1954","hits":7240},{"value":"1950","hits":7118},{"value":"1953","hits":6969},{"value":"1970","hits":6835},{"value":"1971","hits":6425},{"value":"1977","hits":6367},{"value":"1972","hits":6254},{"value":"1952","hits":6162},{"value":"1951","hits":6046},{"value":"1975","hits":5894},{"value":"1976","hits":5863},{"value":"1974","hits":5849},{"value":"1973","hits":5689},{"value":"1979","hits":5416},{"value":"1978","hits":5405},{"value":"1980","hits":5366},{"value":"1995","hits":4885},{"value":"1981","hits":4811},{"value":"1994","hits":4704},{"value":"1948","hits":4597},{"value":"1949","hits":4573},{"value":"1996","hits":4542},{"value":"1982","hits":4417},{"value":"1947","hits":4317},{"value":"1985","hits":4313},{"value":"1998","hits":4281},{"value":"1983","hits":4261},{"value":"1997","hits":4258},{"value":"1984","hits":4152},{"value":"1999","hits":4074},{"value":"1946","hits":4047},{"value":"1945","hits":4018},{"value":"1986","hits":4006},{"value":"1990","hits":3988},{"value":"1943","hits":3900},{"value":"1944","hits":3896},{"value":"2000","hits":3894},{"value":"2001","hits":3876},{"value":"1942","hits":3868},{"value":"1940","hits":3765},{"value":"1941","hits":3758},{"value":"1987","hits":3744},{"value":"2002","hits":3624},{"value":"1991","hits":3553},{"value":"1936","hits":3507},{"value":"1939","hits":3501},{"value":"1992","hits":3500},{"value":"2003","hits":3489},{"value":"1993","hits":3478},{"value":"1938","hits":3466},{"value":"1937","hits":3450},{"value":"1989","hits":3441},{"value":"1930","hits":3378},{"value":"1988","hits":3355},{"value":"1935","hits":3307},{"value":"1933","hits":3271},{"value":"1934","hits":3271},{"value":"1932","hits":3255},{"value":"1931","hits":3240},{"value":"2005","hits":3143},{"value":"2004","hits":2995},{"value":"2006","hits":2860},{"value":"1929","hits":2790},{"value":"1928","hits":2272},{"value":"1921","hits":2124},{"value":"1925","hits":2040},{"value":"1927","hits":2026},{"value":"1924","hits":2012},{"value":"2016","hits":2011},{"value":"1926","hits":2010},{"value":"1920","hits":1976},{"value":"1923","hits":1955},{"value":"1922","hits":1929},{"value":"2007","hits":1715},{"value":"2008","hits":1664},{"value":"2011","hits":1661},{"value":"2009","hits":1624},{"value":"2019","hits":1623},{"value":"2015","hits":1613},{"value":"2013","hits":1604},{"value":"2010","hits":1601},{"value":"2014","hits":1567},{"value":"2012","hits":1553},{"value":"1919","hits":1533},{"value":"1918","hits":1531}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"0193","max":"2035","count":506439,"missing":56},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"photographs","hits":10710},{"value":"correspondence","hits":9628},{"value":"black-and-white photographs","hits":7678},{"value":"negatives (photographs)","hits":7513},{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":4462},{"value":"letters (correspondence)","hits":3623},{"value":"oral histories (literary works)","hits":3607},{"value":"black-and-white negatives","hits":2771},{"value":"editorial cartoons","hits":2620},{"value":"newspapers","hits":1955},{"value":"manuscripts (documents)","hits":1692}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/","hits":41201},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":17721},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/UND/1.0/","hits":8830},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/","hits":7090},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/","hits":2186},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/","hits":1778},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-CR/1.0/","hits":1115},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","hits":145},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/","hits":60},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-RUU/1.0/","hits":51},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","hits":27}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Jim Peppler Southern Courier Photograph Collection","hits":4956},{"value":"John E. Phay Collection ","hits":4706},{"value":"John J. Herrera Papers","hits":3288},{"value":"Baldy Editorial Cartoons, 1946-1982, 1997: Clifford H. Baldowski Editorial Cartoons at the Richard B. Russell Library.","hits":2607},{"value":"Sovereignty Commission Online","hits":2335},{"value":"Strom Thurmond Collection, Mss 100","hits":2068},{"value":"Alabama Media Group Collection","hits":2067},{"value":"Black Trailblazers, Leaders, Activists, and Intellectuals in Cleveland","hits":2033},{"value":"Rosa Parks Papers","hits":1948},{"value":"Isaiah DeQuincey Newman, (1911-1985), Papers, 1929-2003","hits":1904},{"value":"Lillian Eugenia Smith Papers (circa 1920-1980)","hits":1887}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"John Davis Williams Library. Department of Archives and Special Collections","hits":8885},{"value":"Alabama. Department of Archives and History","hits":8153},{"value":"South Caroliniana Library","hits":4251},{"value":"Atlanta University Center Robert W. Woodruff Library","hits":4102},{"value":"University of North Texas. Libraries","hits":3854},{"value":"University of South Carolina. Libraries","hits":3438},{"value":"Hargrett Library","hits":3292},{"value":"Richard B. Russell Library for Political Research and Studies","hits":2874},{"value":"Mississippi. Department of Archives and History","hits":2825},{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":2785},{"value":"Rhodes College","hits":2264}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":81102},{"value":"Collection","hits":455}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":81360},{"value":"true","hits":197}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}