{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_346","title":"''Program Planning and Budgeting''","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1993-07-30"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","School improvement programs"],"dcterms_title":["''Program Planning and Budgeting''"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/346"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 I COURT SUBMISSION JULY 30, 1993 RECEIVED JUL 3 0 1993 Office of Desegregation Monilonng LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING July 30, 1993 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING GENERAL CONCEPT A comprehensive program planning and budgeting process will improve the district's ability to allocate its revenue rationally and, therefore, have maximum impact on achieving the goals of the district. By linking program objectives and program expenditures we can see more clearly if our money is being spent appropriately. During the planning and budgeting process, we will do the following: 1. Determine the needs of the district, particularly legal obligations under the desegregation and settlement plans. 2. Define goals and objectives. 3. Define programs to achieve those objectives. particularly those reguired by the desegregation plans. 4. Measure performance and expenditures. 5. Prepare information for corrective decision-making. A. Organizational structure for Planning and Budgeting Process 1. Key Players - The Superintendent shall lead the planning and budgeting process with direct support from his/her cabinet. The Board is the ultimate decision- maker for the planning and budgeting process. 2. Description - The planning and budgeting process shall be under the leadership of the Superintendent withLRSD - Page 2 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING direct support from the Superintendent's Cabinet. The planning and budgeting process will be coordinated by the Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation (PRE) and the Manager of Resources and School Support who both serve on the Superintendent's Cabinet. The Board will provide guidance for developing a planning and budgeting calendar. The calendar will allow the Board to continuously monitor progress of the planning and budgeting process. The Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation will be the lead planning person. He/She will ensure that the planning process is conducted according to established timeframes, provide technical assistance. coordinate the planning process, collect appropriate reports, coordinate the preparation of related documents and advise the Superintendent and Board relative to the planning process. In addition, the lead planning person will be responsible for ensuring all requirements from the desegregation plans and court orders are integrated into the planning process. The Director of PRE will be assisted by a Planning, Research and Evaluation Specialist whose major responsibility will be district-wide planning. The PRE Specialist will be housed in the PRE office. The job description for the PRE Specialist details the necessary qualifications and job responsibilities (See Attachment 1).LRSD - Page 3 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING 3. Outcome - An organizational chart that displays the current lines of authority and responsibility is attached (Attachment 2), as well as the proposed Planning and Budget Development Calendar (Attachment 4). 4. Timeframe - The lead planning person will be named in July 1993. The Planning and Budget Development Calendar will be finalized in August 1993. The organizational structure will be reviewed in May 1994 to ensure that the July 1993 configuration is the most effective and efficient arrangement. Necessary revisions and adjustments will be made by the district at that time. B. Needs Assessment A needs assessment is a process of comparing the current situation with the desired conditions. 1. Key Players - The Superintendent will provide leadership and direction for the needs assessment process. The lead planning person will coordinate the process. The Superintendent's Cabinet will be responsible for directing the staff in the collection of assessment information. The Superintendent and the Cabinet will be the decision-makers for identifying the needs. 2. Description - Utilizing a combination of district-wide perceptual, empirical and objective instruments, dataLRSD - Page 4 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING will be collected and analyzed to determine the needs of the students, parents, teachers, and administrators. Perceptual information will be collected through broadbased input sessions such as community forums and district dialogue sessions. Three community forums will be conducted. One forum each for area schools, magnet schools and incentive schools will be scheduled. Every effort will be made to strategically locate the sessions to accommodate maximum participation. Additional sessions may be scheduled with other focus groups, when necessary. One district dialogue will be conducted with principals, teachers, classified staff, and central office administrators. An administrative work session will be conducted to review and analyze various districtwide reports and objective data. The following data will be reviewed: Arkansas Minimum Performance Test Results Stanford Achievement Test Results Desegregation Monitoring Reports Desegregation Plan Audit LRSD Desegregation Plans and Court Orders Curriculum Audit School Climate/Human Relations Survey ResultsLRSD - Page 5 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Facilities Study Proportional Allocation Formulas Program Inventory A comparison between identified needs and the program inventory will be conducted to determine if there are programmatic gaps and areas of need. 3. Outcome The outcome of the administrative work sessions, community forums and district dialogue sessions will be a list of needs in the curriculum, desegregation, and support areas that will be rank ordered based on supporting data. The Superintendent and Cabinet will begin to identify programs in need of \"fast-track\" evaluations. 4. Timeframe - The needs assessment for the 1994-95 budget process begins in August 1993 with data collection. An C. initial list will be developed in September 1993. The final list will be developed in November 1993 after the community forums and district dialogues are completed. Progreun Inventory During the needs assessment period which starts in August 1993 for the 1994-95 budget year, current desegregation programs will be identified. 1. Key Players - The Superintendent will provide overall direction, and the Board will review the findings. The lead planning person will coordinate the collection of basic data and prepare the data into appropriateLRSD - Page 6 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING documents for use in goal setting and program modification and/or development. The Cabinet and staff 2. 3. 4. will collect the necessary data. Description - All current programs and services will be identified. Using the desegregation Audit, desegregation programs will be identified and defined first. Non-desegregation programs will be identified, defined and merged with the list of desegregation programs to formulate a composite list of all programs. The desegregation plan and court orders will be reviewed to ensure all obligations related to compliance are operative. Primary and secondary responsible persons will be identified for each program or service. Outcome - A Program Inventory Report will be generated and used during the goals and objectives development process, program modification and/or development process, and the budgeting process. Timeframe - The program inventory will be conducted during the needs assessment period. All desegregation programs will be identified in August 1993. The non-desegregation programs should be identified by the completion of the needs assessment period in November 1993.LRSD - Page 7 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING D. Planning and Budget Goals The goal setting process helps guide all actions of the administration. The process defines the expected outcomes for a specified period of time. 1. Key Players - The Board and Superintendent will provide leadership for identifying the mission and goals of the district. 'The Cabinet will provide assistance and support by defining objectives for programs which will satisfy the accepted goals. The goal setting process 2. will be coordinated by the lead planning person. Description - The Board will conduct a work session. After reviewing the preliminary list of issues for the needs assessment and the Program Inventory Report, the Board will: * Review and revise, if necessary, the mission statement. * Establish tentative written goals/objectives. The goals and objectives will define what the district expects to realistically accomplish for the year. Goals and objectives that conflict with the desegregation plan will not be adopted. * Review and provide guidance related to proportional allocation formulas (materials and supplies. staffing, etc.). * Establish written priorities. These priorities will guide staff in program modification and programLRSD - Page 8 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING development, as well as to help allocate funding and resources during the budgeting process. * Identify any additional programs for \"fast-track\" evaluation. * Consider strategies for funding shortfalls. The Cabinet will work to ensure that program goals and evaluation criteria are linked to the established goals. 3. Outcome - At the conclusion of the goal setting session(s), the Board will publish: * a written mission statement * written goals * a list of priorities The staff will revise program objectives and evaluation criteria as needed for each program, and these will be incorporated into the Program Budget Document. 4. Timeframe - Although the goal setting process is dependent on the needs assessment and program inventory, it will operate concurrently with them. The E. work session will be conducted in September 1993. Program objectives and evaluation criteria will be established by November 1993. A status report will also be provided to the Board in November 1993. Prograun Development If a service or program does not exist to support needs addressed by the defined goals, it may be necessary to develop a program or modify an existing program.LRSD - Page 9 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING 1. Key Players - The Superintendent will provide leadership and guidance to ensure that goals are achieved by offering the best possible programs. The Cabinet will provide direction to staff in developing, modifying, and implementing effective and efficient programs. The lead planning person will monitor and advise the Superintendent throughout the program modification and development phase. 2. Description - Programs may need to be developed to address newly identified needs or fill gaps. Current programs may have to be modified to successfully meet objectives. Some programs may have to be eliminated. The District will establish a framework for program development. The framework will include: * Overview/Program Description * Program Goals/Objectives * Identified Needs * Target Population * Organizational Management/Personnel * Staff Development * Parental Involvement, if any * Physical Facilities, if any * Identification of possible funding sources * Proposed Budget (start-up costs/recurring costs) Impact on Desegregation Plan * Evaluation Criteria * Program Budget Document (See Attachment 5, p. 2)LRSD - Page 10 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Program development and modification will be conducted by staff with the appropriate cabinet level official providing oversight to ensure that all tasks are completed in a timely manner. The Superintendent and the Cabinet will review all program development and modification to ensure that commitments in the desegregation plan are not hindered by such program development or modification. 3. Outcome - Existing programs and programs that are developed to satisfy a need will include all of the elements for budget development and can be directly placed into the Program Budget Document. 4. Timeframe - The program development process will begin in October 1993, if necessary, and conclude in January 1994. F. Budget Priorities - Budgeting 1. Key Players - The Board is the ultimate decision-making authority on the budget. However, the Superintendent will ensure that a balanced budget is developed that meets the needs and goals of the school district. The Manager for Resources and School Support will coordinate the budget preparation process and the lead planning person will ensure that the planning and budgeting components are linked appropriately. Budget managers will provide input relative to his/her area ofLRSD - Page 11 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING responsibility. The Controller will produce the budget 2. 3. 4. information. Description - Funds, personnel and facilities will be allocated based on the goals and objectives of the district. Directions for budget preparation will be issued by the Superintendent. These directions will include the identification of all proportional formulas and exceptions. Outcome - A budget document will be developed that satisfies traditional budgeting and accounting requirements with a program planning and budgeting component which links the program and budget allocations. Funding of desegregation requirements will be a priority. Timefreune December - Prepare initial financial forecast for next and out years. - Issue directions for budget preparation. - Budget managers submit requests for 1994-95 school year. - Begin developing program budget document. January - Begin budget development February - Continue budget development. - Continue developing program budget document March - Revise financial forecast. - Revise program budget document April - Complete program budget documentLRSD - Page 12 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING May-June - Revise budget as needed G. July August - Adopt Budget - Submit 1994-95 budget to Arkansas Department of Education Budget-Planning Document (Program Budget Document) The document will provide the means for monitoring program performance and expenditures throughout the fiscal year. 1. Key Players - The Superintendent will provide guidance for the development of the document. The Cabinet members will provide program information for their respective areas. The Controller will provide financial information for each program. The lead planning person will coordinate the document into the final product. 2. Description - The Desegregation Audit and Program Inventory will provide the information necessary to develop the initial budget document. Programs will be developed or modified in such a manner that the Program Budget Document (Attachment 5, p. 2) will be a necessary component of the submission. A Cabinet member will be assigned as the responsible primary leader for each identified program. A secondary leader will also be assigned. The primary leader is tasked with ensuring the program meets its objectives, coordinating the required activities or IPROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING LRSD - Page 13 strategies, and the preparation and submission of regular reports. 3. Outcome - A program budget document will be developed that will become the basis for monitoring and reporting, and will become a guide for interim decision-making. (See Attachment 5) 4. Timeframe - Development of the document will begin in December and be completed in conjunction with the completion of the tentative budget in April. H. Monitoring and Reporting 1. Key Players - The Board and Superintendent will be the recipients of the reporting for oversight and decision- making. The lead planning person will coordinate the process and prepare a composite report. The Manager for Resources and School Support will provide matching financial information by program. The Cabinet and Staff will prepare all reporting documents falling within their area of responsibility. 2. Description - The program budget document will be the basis for monitoring and reporting, and will establish the format and design. The document would merge both program performance and expenditure reporting on a quarterly basis. Programs with poor performance or expenditure problems could be addressed with corrective action during the year rather than after the year is completed.LRSD - Page 14 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING 3. Outcome - The result would be a quarterly composite progress report on identified programs within the district, supported with expenditure information. The quarterly report would be an extension of the program 4. budget document. Timeframe - The first report would be generated by the end of October for the period July, August, and September. Subsequent quarterly reports would be due by the end of January, April, and July. I. Program Evaluation Program evaluation will provide an assessment of performance for decision-making purposes. 1. Key Players - The Board and Superintendent are recipients of the evaluations, and will use the information to determine direction and resource allocation. The lead planning person will coordinate the program evaluation process. The Manager of Resources and School Support will provide supporting financial information. The Cabinet and staff will 2. prepare all reporting documents falling within their area of responsibility. Description - During the first year of the planning and budgeting process only, there will be two concurrent and parallel program evaluation components, evaluation and a \"fast-track\" evaluation. A regular II fast- A track\" evaluation does not have the details orLRSD - Page 15 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING dimension of a regular evaluation, since the evaluative process is conducted in a reduced time frame. After the first year, \"fast-track\" evaluations will be utilized as necessary. Each program will be evaluated through the district's regular program evaluation component. As 3. 4. J. programs are developed and implemented, they will contain program objectives and evaluation criteria. Special evaluations might be directed by the Superintendent. Programs may be identified for \"fast- track\" evaluation if they have high impact on the goals and direction of the district. Outcome - Program evaluation information will enable the district to make programmatic decisions in the areas of program modification, program development. program elimination and resource allocation which are the result of careful planning and thoughtful analysis. Timeframe - The initial evaluation period will begin in August 1993 and continue until the initial decision point in the budgeting phase in January 1994. Broad-Based Feedback Broad-based feedback is designed to provide feedback to the various groups who participated in the community forum and district dialogues. Every effort will be made to include other interested groups, if needed. 1. Key Players - The Board and the Superintendent will provide direction for the broad-based feedback. TheLRSD - Page 16 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Director of Communications, with the assistance from the lead planning person, will develop a plan for disseminating information. 2. Description - Seven broad-based feedback sessions will be conducted to provide information relative to the planning and budgeting process to the community and our employees. The target populations will be the same as the broad-based input sessions conducted in October 1993 and November 1993. 3. Outcome - Positive community support in recognition of the thoughtfully planned budgeting process may be generated. 4. Timeframe - Broad-based feedback sessions will be conducted in March 1994. K. Summary - A Strategy to Address shortfall of Funding One of the primary goals of the long-range planning and budget process is to instill in the minds of the patrons and others interested in the affairs of the District a new sense of fiscal responsibility, accountability and internal program evaluation by the District. Such tools as the program inventory, needs assessment strategies and quarterly reporting will serve to not only strengthen the process, as outlined in the monthly calendar of critical events, but to increase the community's awareness of the Desegregation Plan, the commitments it contains and the District's carefully thought-out process designed to live up to thoseLRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 17 commitments. with commitment comes the responsibility of providing funds and ensuring that the funding levels are sufficient to support those programs that are determined by the planning and evaluation process to be effective toward achieving the desired goals. Increased use and refinement of the District's new Position Control Inventory System software should yield valuable data for program evaluation and budget decision making. Internal monthly reporting will be structured to provide more historical data for additional analysis and on-going monitoring. Quarterly monitoring reports, by way of the Program Budget Document, will also be provided. serve as This process, plus the program linkages will the basis for future funding decisions by the Board and the administration. Once these steps and procedures become fully operational, the District will be able to identify those operations which can either be modified or eliminated, thereby serving to demonstrate the level of fiscal responsibility needed to garner community support for future requests for funding. Further, by achieving greater staffing efficiency, reducing over-use of materials and supplies (i.e., through proportional allocations, etc.) and by directing the District's resources toward those programs with demonstrated track records of success, the District will be able to reduce or, hopefully, eliminate its reliance on non-recurring revenue sources. Accordingly, the long- range planning and budget process will be the key componentLRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 18 of the District's strategy to address anticipated funding shortfalls. The Continuing Process - Planning and budgeting is a continuing process. As such, the needs assessment and program inventory for FY 1994-95 will begin in May 1994. The lead planning person will review the process and make recommendations for changes to the Superintendent, if necessary. The lead planning person will ensure that the planning process is implemented as designed and coordinate the activities.ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1 Planning, Research and Evaluation Specialist Job Description Attachment 2 Organizational chart Attachment 3 Attachment 4 Planning and Budget Cycle Planning and Budget Calendar Attachment 5 Budget FoirmatAttachment 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 please post July 14, 1993 PLEASE POST The Little Rock School District is now accepting applications for the following position for the 1993-94 school year: POSITION: Planning, Research and Evaluation Specialist qualifications\n1. A master's degree or higher in psychology, counseling education. or 2. Eligibility for an Arkansas teacher or administrator certificate. 3. At least five (5) years of successful public school or higher 4. 5. 6. 7. NOTE: counselor, psychologist. education experience as a teacher, psychologist, or Additional related experience may be substituted administrator. for public school experience. Evidence of strong organizational and interpersonal skills. Knowledge of planning concepts and techniques. Demonstrates the conviction that all children can learn and will learn in the Little Rock School District. Evidence of a strong commitment to quality desegregated education. APPLICANTS SHOULD BE PREPARED TO SHOW EVIDENCE OF THESE QUALIFICATIONS IN THE INITIAL SCREENING INTERVIEW. reports TO: Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation JOB GOAL: To provide technical support in the area of strategic planning to the Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation so that he/she is able to provide the Superintendent and Board of Directors with pertinent evaluative data on all programs and services (both educational and supportive) being provided by the school district. BASIC PERFORMANCE RESPONSIBILITIES: Provides technical support to the Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation in the following ways: 1. Coordinates and provides assistance and technical support for the districtwide planning process.planning. Research and Evaluation Specialist page 2 Attachment 1 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Assists in preparing and implementing the planning document. Assists with the collection of reports and other documents related to the planning process. Ensures that all requirements from the desegregation plans and court orders are integrated into the planning process. Keeps continually informed regarding research in educational testing and the development of useful information and improved tests for use in educational and supportive programs. Develops system-wide evaluation designs and develops schedules for implementing the evaluation designs. Administers and/or supervises the administration of group tests. Monitors, on an ongoing basis, the programs being evaluated by the Planning, Research and Evaluation Department. Assists with the supervision and scoring of tests and conducts statistical analysis of test results for all schools and areas of group testing conducted. Prepares informative reports and instructional materials for the guidance of counselors, teachers, and other professionals who use evaluation results and/or test data in performing their own duties. Provides leadership in the development of improved instruments and procedures for evaluating programs and services. Designs and/or administers studies to identify community, fiscal, staff, and other factors which can account for variations in quality within the school system, and suggests ways to improve level of student achievement. Assists with the implementation of data processing programs in the area of student testing and evaluation. Serves as a resource person in planning and conducting inservice educational activities for the improvement of teaching practices in the areas of test construction, test administration, and test results evaluation. Prepares various reports as designated by the Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation. Assumes other duties as assigned by the Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation. TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT: Twelve month annual contract plus Educational Stipend, Car Allowance and Benefits Package.planning. Research and Evaluation Specialist page 3 Attachment 1 gBADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF APPLICATION* pBNP WRITTEN LETTERS OF INQUIRY TO- Director of Human Resources Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 IIOTE: INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN THE ABOVE POSITION MUST COMPLETE A VERY RIGOROUS SELECTION PROCESS. ___ THEREFORE, BECAUSE AN INDIVIDUAL applies for a position does not NECESSARILY MEAN THAT AN INTERVIEW WILL BE CONDUCTED.ATTACHMENT 2 I I Communicationa Planning Rasaarchl i Equation | I Assoc. Sqpl. Desagretabon I Assoc. Stet. School OperaL I \"Student Aaaignment Hearing Officar I _ Daaegregtfion Fadlitalor Volunleera in Public Sd^b ] I 1 Before- A After- SchoofCARE - Parent RecruHment Crwrdinalor ] ) Parent Coordinator Aaai. Supt., Elem. 16 Schoola . Sipt., Elem. 14 Schoola PrindpEela Teaehera 1. *lncentive Schoola (7) Principe Teachera BOARD OF DIRECTORS Little Rock School District Organizational Structure JULY 1993 Interim Superintendent Reading Aaat. Supt., SSae c. 13Scho^ - Language ArW J Principato 1 Teadwra New Futurea *Athletica Alternative Leamirig 1 *RespoDsibiUty of Appropriate Associate Superinteadail Revisions will be made in accordance with district procedures. 1. I 1 Labor RaMiona Human Ftesoums Foreign Language Sdanoe Mathemalica Social Sludiea I 1 Assoc. SL0. CurricUum I Rne Aria Vocadiortal Manager Resourees and \u0026amp;hool Support ControNer I *lnatnxhor^ Technology *Phyaical Education Drug Education - Early Childhood  Staff Development Tentative placement in recognition of LRSD Curriculum Audit, 12/21/90, p.l02. - Federal Programed x!ti EaceptiorMrf Children Adu* Education 1 FadMiea Servioee 1 Procuramanl Library Servioea Tranaportalion FoodSarvioea 1 4 Security/Riok Manag^enl 1 Mormaiien Sarvicea1 PLANNING AND BUDGETING CYCLE Attachment 3 I -- I ACTIVITIES July Aug. 19 9 3 Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May 3 9 9 4 June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. 19 9 5 Apr. May June July Aug. I Needs Assessment Begins Program Inventory Degins May= Goa 1s/Object ives Development Program Development i Budgeting Budget Document Monitoring and Reporting '(prior qnaiterly reports) Progr-jm EvaluationATTACHMENT 4 PROPOSED PLANNING BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 JULY 1993 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSONfS) Designate lead planning person Superintendent Develop proposed budget calendar for budget year 1994-95 Superintendent and Cabinet Begin Desegregation Program Inventory using desegregation audit as baseline Superintendent and Cabinet Identify tentative list of various types of districtwide objectives and perceptual data to be collected for the needs assessment Superintendent and Cabinet AUGUST 1993 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Establish final Budget Calendar for 1994-95 that will allow the Board to monitor progress of the planning and budgeting process Superintendent Begin to develop monitoring and reporting procedures and issue instructions, as needed. Superintendent and Cabinet Begin development of proportional allocation formulas Superintendent and Cabinet Begin data collection Lead Planning Person Begin to identify programs for \"fast-track\" evaluation Complete Desegregation Program Inventory Superintendent and Cabinet Superintendent and CabinetATTACHMENT 4 P. 2 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 SEPTEMBER 1993 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Conduct work session for analysis of collected data Superintendent and Cabinet * Develop preliminary list of issues for needs assessment * Identify the need for program modification or development Conduct Board work session Board and Superintendent * Review preliminary list of issues for needs assessment * Review Desegregation Program Inventory Report * Review and revise, if necessary, the mission statement. * Establish tentative written goals/obj ectives. * Establish written priorities. * Review and provide guidance related to proportional allocation formulas * Consider strategies for funding shortfall * Identify any additional programs for \"fast-track\" evaluation (End of first quarter reporting period.)ATTACHMENT 4 P. 3 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 OCTOBER 1993 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Begin necessary program modification or development Cabinet and Program Manager Begin to generate broad-based input for budget process Superintendent and Director of Communications Issue first quarter FY 1993-94 cycle monitoring and evaluation report (Program Budget Document) Controller Lead Planning Person NOVEMBER 1993 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Complete the gathering of broad-based input for budget process Superintendent and Director of Communications Complete identification of proportional allocation formulas and exceptions Superintendent Complete Needs Assessment listing using infoirmation gathered from broad-based input sessions. Superintendent and Cabinet Finalize program objectives and evaluation criteria for each desegregation program. Superintendent and Cabinet Complete inventory list of non-desegregation programs Superintendent and Cabinet Status report to Board on Budget Process Superintendent and Lead Planning PersonATTACHMENT 4 P. 4 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 DECEMBER 1993 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Prepare initial financial forecast for next and out years Controller Issue directions for budget preparation Superintendent Manager Resources and School Support Controller Budget managers submit request for 1994-95 school year Manager Resources and School Support Controller Begin developing program budget document Controller (End of second quarter reporting period.) JANUARY 1994 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Complete fast-track evaluations Lead Planning Person Cabinet Begin Budget Development Manager of Resources and School Support Controller Complete modifications or program development for submission to Superintendent and Cabinet Program Managers in Curriculum, Desegregation, and Resources and School Support Submit program modifications and development to Board Superintendent Issue second quarter FY 1993-94 cycle monitoring and evaluation report (Program Budget Document) Controller and Lead Planning PersonATTACHMENT 4 P. 5 FEBRUARY 1994 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Continue Budget Development Controller Continue developing the program budget document Controller MARCH 1994 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Revise financial forecast Controller Revise the program budget document Controller Provide feedback to input participants Superintendent and Director of Communications (End of third quarter reporting period.)ATTACHMENT 4 P. 6 APRIL 1994 ACTIVITY PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Complete program budget document Controller Submit proposed budget to Board Superintendent Conduct Board work session on budget Superintendent and Board Revise budget as needed Superintendent and Cabinet Certified personnel reduction deadline Superintendent Issue third guarter FY 1993-94 cycle monitoring and evaluation report (Program Budget Document) Controller and Lead Planning Person MAY 1994 ACTIVITY Revise budget as needed RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Superintendent and Cabinet Board work session on budget, if needed Superintendent and Cabinet Approval of tentative budget Board and Superintendent Classified personnel reduction deadline Superintendent Reassess planning organization for FY 1994-95 cycle Superintendent and Cabinet Begin FY 1994-95 cycle needs assessment Lead planning person Begin program inventory for FY 1994-95 Lead planning personATTACHMENT 4 P. 7 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 JUNE 1994 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Revise budget as needed Superintendent and Cabinet Continue FY 1994-95 cycle needs assessment Lead planning person Continue FY 1994-95 cycle program inventory Lead planning person (End fourth quarter reporting period.) JULY 1994 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Adopt Budget Board Conduct Board work session on planning and budgeting to include: Board and Superintendent * defining tentative goals A A A defining guidelines on broad-based input designing tentative planning and budget development calendar defining any \"fast-track\" evaluations Continue FY 1994-95 cycle needs assessment Lead planning person Continue FY 1994-95 cycle program inventory Lead planning person Issue fourth quarter FY 1993-94 cycle monitoring and evaluation report Controller and Lead Planning PersonATTACHMENT 4 P. 8 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 AUGUST 1994 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Submit 1994-95 budget to Arkansas Department of Education Superintendent Establish final Budget Calendar for FY 1994-95 cycle Superintendent Continue FY 1994-95 cycle needs assessment Lead planning person Complete FY 1994-95 cycle program inventory (Program Budget Document) Lead planning personProgram Seq H: Program Name\nProgram Code\nProgram Description: District Goal Support: Program Ob|eclive\nPlfln References: FY Program Budget: YTD Expenditures: ATTACHMENT 5 LRSD FY 93-94 TENTATIVE PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Primary Leader Secondary Leader Page: 1 Revision Data\n] l6t Qlr Expend: 2nd Qtr Expend: 3rd Qtr Expend: 4th Qtr Expend:ATTACHMENT 5 p.2 Program Seq H: Program Nome\nProgram Code\nProgram Ob|eclive\nPlan Reference Page Number Objectives LRSD FY 93-94 TENTATIVE PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Primary Leaden Secondary Leader\nPage\n2 Revision Date\nStrategics Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibi 1ity Evaluation Criteria 1J LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 HI r I\" COURT SUBMISSION JULY 30, 1993 I I I iLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING July 30, 1993 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING GENERAL CONCEPT A comprehensive program planning and budgeting process will improve the district's ability to allocate its revenue rationally and, therefore, have maximum impact on achieving the goals of the district. By linking program objectives and program expenditures we can see more clearly if our money is being spent appropriately During the planning and budgeting process, we will do the following: 1. Determine the needs of the district, particularly legal obligations under the desegregation and settlement plans. 2 . Define goals and objectives. 3. Define programs to achieve those objectives, particularly those required by the desegregation plans. 4. Measure performance and expenditures. 5. Prepare information for corrective decision-making. A. Organizational Structure for Planning and Budgeting Process 1. Key Players - The Superintendent shall lead the planning and budgeting process with direct support from his/her cabinet. The Board is the ultimate decision- maker for the planning and budgeting process. 2. Description - The planning and budgeting process shall be under the leadership of the Superintendent withLRSD - Page 2 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING direct support from the Superintendent's Cabinet. The planning and budgeting process will be coordinated by the Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation (PRE) and the Manager of Resources and School Support who both serve on the Superintendent's Cabinet. The Board will provide guidance for developing a planning and budgeting calendar. The calendar will allow the Board to continuously monitor progress of the planning and budgeting process. The Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation will be the lead planning person. He/She will ensure that the planning process is conducted according to established timeframes, provide technical assistance. coordinate the planning process, collect appropriate reports, coordinate the preparation of related documents and advise the Superintendent and Board relative to the planning process. In addition, the lead planning person will be responsible for ensuring all requirements from the desegregation plans and court orders are integrated into the planning process. The Director of PRE will be assisted by a Planning, Research and Evaluation Specialist whose major responsibility will be district-wide planning. The PRE Specialist will be housed in the PRE office. The job description for the PRE Specialist details the necessary qualifications and job responsibilities (See Attachment 1).LRSD - Page 3 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING 3. Outcome - An organizational chart that displays the current lines of authority and responsibility is attached (Attachment 2), as well as the proposed Planning and Budget Development Calendar (Attachment 4). 4. Timeframe - The lead planning person will be named in July 1993. The Planning and Budget Development Calendar will be finalized in August 1993. The organizational structure will be reviewed in May 1994 to ensure that the July 1993 configuration is the most effective and efficient arrangement. Necessary revisions and adjustments will be made by the district at that time. B. Needs Assessment A needs assessment is a process of comparing the current situation with the desired conditions. 1. Key Players - The Superintendent will provide leadership and direction for the needs assessment process. The lead planning person will coordinate the process. The Superintendent's Cabinet will be responsible for directing the staff in the collection of assessment information. The Superintendent and the Cabinet will be the decision-makers for identifying the needs. 2. Description - Utilizing a combination of district-wide perceptual, empirical and objective instruments, dataLRSD - Page 4 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING will be collected and analyzed to determine the needs of the students, parents, teachers, and administrators. Perceptual infoirmation will be collected through broadbased input sessions such as community forums and district dialogue sessions. Three community forums will be conducted. One forum each for area schools, magnet schools and incentive schools will be scheduled. Every effort will be made to strategically locate the sessions to accommodate maximum participation. Additional sessions may be scheduled with other focus groups, when necessary. One district dialogue will be conducted with principals, teachers, classified staff, and central office administrators. An administrative work session will be conducted to review and analyze various districtwide reports and objective data. The following data will be reviewed: Arkansas Minimum Performance Test Results Stanford Achievement Test Results Desegregation Monitoring Reports Desegregation Plan Audit LRSD Desegregation Plans and Court Orders Curriculum Audit School Climate/Human Relations Survey ResultsLRSD - Page 5 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Facilities Study Proportional Allocation Formulas Program Inventory A comparison between identified needs and the program inventory will be conducted to determine if there are programmatic gaps and areas of need. 3. Outcome - The outcome of the administrative work sessions, community forums and district dialogue sessions will be a list of needs in the curriculum, desegregation, and support areas that will be rank ordered based on supporting data. The Superintendent and Cabinet will begin to identify programs in need of \"fast-track\" evaluations. 4. Timeframe - The needs assessment for the 1994-95 budget process begins in August 1993 with data collection. An C. initial list will be developed in September 1993. The final list will be developed in November 1993 after the community forums and district dialogues are completed. Program Inventory During the needs assessment period which starts in August 19 for the 1994-95 budget year, current desegregation programs will be identified. 1. Key Players - The ferintendent will provide overall direction, and the Board will review the findings. The lead planning person will coordinate the collection of basic data and prepare the data into appropriateLRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 6 documents for use in goal setting and program modification and/or development. The Cabinet and staff 2. 3. 4. will collect the necessary data. Description - All current programs and services will be identified. Using the desegregation Audit, desegregation programs will be identified and defined first. Non-desegregation programs will be identified. defined and merged with the list of desegregation programs to formulate a composite list of all programs. The desegregation plan and court orders will be reviewed to ensure all obligations related to compliance are operative. Primary and secondary responsible persons will be identified for each program or service. Outcome - A Program Inventory Report will be generated and used during the goals and objectives development process, program modification and/or development process, and the budgeting process. Timeframe - The program inventory will be conducted during the needs assessment period. All desegregation programs will be identified in August 1993. The non-desegregation programs should be identified by the completion of the needs assessment period in November 1993.LRSD - Page 7 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING D. Planning and Budget Goals The goal setting process helps guide all actions of the administration. The process defines the expected outcomes for a specified period of time. 1. Key Players - The Board and Superintendent will provide leadership for identifying the mission and goals of the district. 'The Cabinet will provide assistance and support by defining objectives for programs which will satisfy the accepted goals. The goal setting process will be coordinated by the lead planning person. Description - The Board will conduct a work session. After reviewing the preliminary list of issues for the needs assessment and the Program Inventory Report, the Board will: * Review and revise, if necessary, the mission statement. * Establish tentative written goals/objectives. The goals and objectives will define what the district expects to realistically accomplish for the year. Goals and objectives that conflict with the desegregation plan will not be adopted. * Review and provide guidance related to proportional allocation foirmulas (materials and supplies, staffing, etc.). * Establish written priorities. These priorities will guide staff in program modification and program LRSD - Page 8 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING development, as well as to help allocate funding and resources during the budgeting process. * Identify any additional programs for \"fast-track\" evaluation. * Consider strategies for funding shortfalls. The Cabinet will work to ensure that program goals and evaluation criteria are linked to the established goals. 3. Outcome - At the conclusion of the goal setting session(s), the Board will publish: * a written mission statement * written goals * a list of priorities The staff will revise program objectives and evaluation criteria as needed for each program, and these will be incorporated into the Program Budget Document. 4. Timeframe - Although the goal setting process is dependent on the needs assessment and program inventory, it will operate concurrently with them. The E. work session will be conducted in September 1993. Program objectives and evaluation criteria will be established by November 1993. A status report will also be provided to the Board in November 1993. Prograun Development 3 service or program does not exist to support needs addressed by the defined goals, it may be necessary to develop a program or modify an existing program.LRSD - Page 9 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING 1. Key Players - The Superintendent will provide leadership and guidance to ensure that goals are I 2. achieved by offering the best possible programs. The Cabinet will provide direction to staff in developing, j modifying, and implementing effective and efficient programs. The lead planning person will monitor and^ advise the Superintendent throughout the program modification and development phase. Description - Programs may need to be developed to address newly identified needs or fill gaps. Current  programs may have to be modified to successfully meet objectives. Some programs may have to be eliminated. The District will establish a framework for program development. The framework will include: * Overview/Program Description * Program Goals/Objectives * Identified Needs A A Target Population Organizational Management/Personnel * Staff Development * Parental Involvement, if any A Physical Facilities, if any Identification of possible funding sources A  Proposed Budget (start-up costs/recurring costs) Impact on Desegregation Plan * Evaluation Criteria A Program Budget Document (See Attachment 5, p. 2)LRSD - Page 10 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Program development and modification will be conducted by staff with the appropriate cabinet level official providing oversight to ensure that all tasks are completed in a timely manner. The Superintendent and the Cabinet will review all program development and modification to ensure that commitments in the desegregation plan are not hindered by such program development or modification. 3. Outcome - Existing programs and programs that are developed to satisfy a need will include all of the elements for budget development and can be directly 4. placed into the Program Budget Document. Timeframe - The program development process will begin in October 1993, if necessary, and conclude in January 1994. F. Budget Priorities - Budgeting 1. Key Players - The Board is the ultimate decision-making authority on the budget. However, the Superintendent will ensure that a balanced budget is developed that meets the needs and goals of the school district. The Manager for Resources and School Support will coordinate the budget preparation process and the lead planning person will ensure that the planning and budgeting components are linked appropriately. Budget managers will provide input relative to his/her area ofLRSD - Page 11 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING responsibility. The Controller will produce the budget 2. 3. 4. information. Description - Funds, personnel and facilities will be allocated based on the goals and objectives of the district. Directions for budget preparation will be issued by the Superintendent. These directions will include the identification of all proportional formulas and exceptions. Outcome - A budget document will be developed that satisfies traditional budgeting and accounting requirements with a program planning and budgeting component which links the program and budget allocations. Funding of desegregation requirements will be a priority. Timeframe - December - Prepare initial financial forecast for next and out years. - Issue directions for budget preparation. - Budget managers submit requests for 1994-95 school year. - Begin developing program budget document. January - Begin budget development February - Continue budget development. - Continue developing program budget document March - Revise financial forecast. - Revise program budget document April - Complete program budget documentPROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING LRSD - Page 12 May-June - Revise budget as needed G. July August - Adopt Budget - Submit 1994-95 budget to Arkansas Department of Education Budget-Planning Document (Program Budget Document) The document will provide the means for monitoring program performance and expenditures throughout the fiscal year. 1. Key Players - The Superintendent will provide guidance for the development of the document. The Cabinet members will provide program information for their respective areas. The Controller will provide financial infonnation for each program. The lead planning person will coordinate the document into the final product. 2. Description - The Desegregation Audit and Program Inventory will provide the information necessary to develop the initial budget document. Programs will be developed or modified in such a manner that the Program Budget Document (Attachment 5, p. 2) will be a necessary component of the submission. A Cabinet member will be assigned as the responsible primary leader for each identified program. A secondary leader will also be assigned. The primary leader is tasked with ensuring the program meets its objectives, coordinating the required activities orPROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING LRSD - Page 13 strategies, and the preparation and submission of regular reports. 3. Outcome - A program budget document will be developed that will become the basis for monitoring and reporting, and will become a guide for interim decision-making. (See Attachment 5) 4. Timeframe - Development of the document will begin in December and be completed in conjunction with the completion of the tentative budget in April. H. Monitoring and Reporting 1. Key Players - The Board and Superintendent will be the recipients of the reporting for oversight and decision- making. The lead planning person will coordinate the process and prepare a composite report. The Manager for Resources and School Support will provide matching financial information by program. The Cabinet and Staff will prepare all reporting documents falling within their area of responsibility. 2. Description - The program budget document will be the basis for monitoring and reporting, and will establish the format and design. The document would merge both program performance and expenditure reporting on a quarterly basis. Programs with poor performance or expenditure problems could be addressed with corrective action during the year rather than after the year is completed.LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 14 3. Outcome - The result would be a quarterly composite progress report on identified programs within the district, supported with expenditure information. The quarterly report would be an extension of the program 4. budget document. Timeframe - The first report would be generated by the end of October for the period July, August, and September. Subsequent quarterly reports would be due by the end of January, April, and July. I. Program Evaluation Program evaluation will provide an assessment of performance for decision-making purposes. 1. Players  The Board and Superintendent are recipients of the evaluations, and will use the information to determine direction and resource allocation. The lead planning person will coordinate the program evaluation process. The Manager of Resources and School Support will provide supporting financial information. The Cabinet and staff will prepare all reporting documents falling within their area of responsibility. 2. Description - During the first year of the planning and budgeting process only, there will be two concurrent and parallel program evaluation components. A regular evaluation and a \"fast-track\" evaluation. A \"fast- track\" evaluation does not have the details orLRSD - Page 15 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING dimension of a regular evaluation, since the evaluative process is conducted in a reduced time frame. After the first year, \"fast-track\" evaluations will be utilized as necessary. Each program will be evaluated through the district's regular program evaluation component. As programs are developed and implemented, they will contain program objectives and evaluation criteria. Special evaluations might be directed by the Superintendent . Programs may be identified for \"fast- track\" evaluation if they have high impact on the goals and direction of the district. 3. Outcome - Program evaluation information will enable the district to make programmatic decisions in the areas of program modification, program development. program elimination and resource allocation which are the result of careful planning and thoughtful analysis. 4. Timeframe - The initial evaluation period will begin in August 1993 and continue until the initial decision point in the budgeting phase in January 1994. J. Broad-Based Feedback Broad-based feedback is designed to provide feedback to the various groups who participated in the community forum and district dialogues. Every effort will be made to include other interested groups, if needed. 1. Key Players - The Board and the Superintendent will provide direction for the broad-based feedback. TheLRSD - Page 16 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Director of Communications, with the assistance from the lead planning person, will develop a plan for 2. disseminating information. Description - Seven broad-based feedback sessions will be conducted to provide information relative to the planning and budgeting process to the community and our employees. The target populations will be the same as the broad-based input sessions conducted in October 1993 and November 1993. 3. Outcome - Positive community support in recognition of the thoughtfully planned budgeting process may be 4. generated. Timefrzune - Broad-based feedback sessions will be conducted in March 1994. K. Sxunmary - A Strategy to Address Shortfall of Funding One of the primary goals of the long-range planning and budget process is to instill in the minds of the patrons and others interested in the affairs of the District a new sense of fiscal responsibility, accountability and internal program evaluation by the District. Such tools as the program inventory, needs assessment strategies and quarterly reporting will serve to not only strengthen the process. as outlined in the monthly calendar of critical events, but to increase the community's awareness of the Desegregation Plan, the commitments it contains and the District's carefully thought-out process designed to live up to thoseLRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 17 commitments. with commitment comes the responsibility of providing funds and ensuring that the funding levels are sufficient to support those programs the planning and evaluation process that are determined by to be effective toward achieving the desired goals. Increased use and refinement of the District's new Position Control Inventory System software should yield valuable data for program evaluation and budget decision making. Internal monthly reporting will be structured to provide more historical data for additional analysis and on-going monitoring. Quarterly monitoring reports, by way of the Program Budget Document, will also be provided. This process, plus the program linkages will serve as the basis for future funding decisions by the Board and the administration. Once these steps and procedures become fully operational, the District will be able to identify those operations which can either be modified or eliminated, thereby serving to demonstrate the level of fiscal responsibility needed to garner community support for future requests for funding. Further, by achieving greater staffing efficiency, reducing over-use of materials and supplies (i.e., through proportional allocations, etc.) and by directing the District's resources toward those programs with demonstrated track records of success, the District will be able to reduce or, hopefully, eliminate its reliance on non-recurring revenue sources. Accordingly, the long- range planning and budget process will be the key componentLRSD - Page 18 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING of the District's strategy to address anticipated funding shortfalls. The Continuing Process - Planning and budgeting is a continuing process. As such, the needs assessment and program inventory for FY 1994-95 will begin in May 1994. The lead planning person will review the process and make recommendations for changes to the Superintendent, if necessary. The lead planning person will ensure that the planning process is implemented as designed and coordinate the activities.ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1 Planning, Research and Evaluation Specialist Job Description Attachment 2 Organizational chart Attachment 3 Planning and Budget Cycle Attachment 4 Planning and Budget Calendar Attachment 5 Budget FoirmatAttachment 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 PLEASE POST July 14, 1993 PLEASE POST The Little Rock School District is now accepting applications for the following position for the 1993-94 school year\nPOSITION\nPlanning, Research and Evaluation Specialist QOALIFICATIONS\n1. A master's degree or higher in psychology, counseling or education. 2. Eligibility for an Arkansas teacher or administrator certificate. 3. At least five (5) years of successful public school or higher education experience as a teacher, counselor, psychologist, or Additional related experience may be substituted or 4. 5. 6. 7. NOTE\nadministrator. for public school experience. Evidence of strong organizational and interpersonal skills. Knowledge of planning concepts and techniques the conviction that all children can learn and will Demonstrates -- learn in the Little Rock School District. Evidence of a strong commitment to quality desegregated education. SHOULD BE PREPARED TO SHOW EVIDENCE OF THESE QPALIFI- APPLICANTS _________________ CATIONS IN THE INITIAL SCREENING INTERVIEW,. REPORTS TO\nDirector of Planning, Research and Evaluation JOB GOAL\ntechnical support in the area of strategic planning to the To provide Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation so that he/she is able to provide the Superintendent and Board of Directors with pertinent evaluative data on all programs and services (both educational and supportive) being provided by the school district. basic performance RESPONSIBILITIES\ntechnical support to the Director of Planning, Research and Provides ----- Evaluation in the following ways\n1. Coordinates and provides assistance and technical support for the districtwide planning process.Planning, Research and Evaluation Specialist Page 2 Attachment 1 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13 . 14. 15. 16. Assists in preparing and implementing the planning document. Assists with the collection of reports and other documents related to the planning process. Ensures that all requirements from the desegregation plans and court orders are integrated into the planning process. Keeps continually informed regarding research in educational testing and the development of useful information and improved tests for use in educational and supportive programs. Develops system-wide evaluation designs and develops schedules for implementing the evaluation designs. Administers and/or supervises the administration of group tests. Monitors, on an ongoing basis, the programs being evaluated by the Planning, Research and Evaluation Department. Assists with the supervision and scoring of tests and conducts statistical analysis of test results for all schools and areas of group testing conducted. Prepares informative reports and instructional materials for the guidance of counselors, teachers, and other professionals who use evaluation results and/or test data in performing their own duties. Provides leadership in the development of improved instruments and procedures for evaluating programs and services. Designs and/or administers studies to identify community, fiscal, staff, and other factors which can account for variations in quality within the school system, and suggests ways to improve level of student achievement. Assists with the implementation of data processing programs in the area of student testing and evaluation. Serves as a resource person in planning and conducting inservice educational activities for the improvement of teaching practices in the areas of test construction, test administration, and test results evaluation. Prepares various reports as designated by the Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation. Assumes other duties as assigned by the Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation. ?BRM5 of EMPLOYMENT\nTwelve month annual contract plus Educational Stipend, Car Allowance and Benefits Package.Planning, Research and Evaluation Specialist Page 3 Attachment 1 DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF APPLICATION\nSEND WRITTEN LETTERS OF INQUIRY TO\nDirector of Human Resources Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 MOTE\nINDIVIDUALS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN THE ABOVE POSITION MUST COMPLETE A VERY RIGOROUS SELECTION PROCESS. THEREFORE, BECAUSE AN INDIVIDUAL APPLIES FOR A POSITION DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEAN THAT AN INTERVIEW WILL BE CONDUCTED. ATTACHMENT 2  CommuncatiorwIPIannbg Retearchl A Evaluation | I Aaaoc. Supt. Deeegretabon Assoc. Sum. Schod Opera*. *Studam Aaaignmam Hearing Officar } I Oaaagragmion FaoMator Aaat. SupI. Etom. leSchooto . S^)(., Etom. MSdwoto Volumaara in Public Schooli I Principato I Prwvipato Balora- A Aftar- SdwolCARE I - Param Racruttmant CMrdinator Param Coordinator Taactwra Taadwra 1. *lncemM Schools (7) BOARD OF DIRECTORS Little Rock School District Organizational Structure JULY 1993 Interim Superintendent AMt Suol .S*:. I Schoola I 13 T Prkcipada Taachara Naw RAuraa *Athlatics ANamativa Laammg *RespoosibiUty of Approprlale Attociate SuperatteodeDl Revisions will be made in accordance with district procedures. 1. Raading - Languaga ArW I 1 Labor Ralitior* HumanRMOurcas Foratgn Lartguaga Scianca Mathamalica Sedai Studiaa I 1 Assoc. Sqpl. Currtculum I Rna Arts Vocational Manager Rc avl^iool Resources SuRWt ControNar I Inatructional Technology *Physicat Edu^ion - Drug Education - Early Childhood -* Staff Davaloprrtam Tentative placement in recognition of LRSD Curriculum Audit, 12/21/90, p.l02. - Fadar,al aP2mxi,yvnaf Exceptional Chibran Achi Education * Library Sarvioaa F^diitiaa Sarvioaa \" Tranaportaiion Food Sarvioaa Procuramant Saily/Ri\u0026gt;k Managmarn - Mormation Sarvicaa I Attachment 3 ACTIVITIES July Aug. 19 9 3 Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. PIANNING AND BUDGETING CYCLE Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May 3 9 9 4 June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. 19 9 5 Apr. May June July Aug. Needs Assessment Begins Program Inventory Degins JJay- Goals/CbjectIves Development Program Development Budget i ng Budget Document Monitoring and Reporting i (prior quazterly reports) Program Evaluation ATTACHMENT 4 PROPOSED PLANNING BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 JULY 1993 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Designate lead planning person Superintendent Develop proposed budget calendar for budget year 1994-95 Superintendent and Cabinet Begin Desegregation Program Inventory using desegregation audit as baseline Superintendent and Cabinet Identify tentative list of various types of districtwide objectives and perceptual data to be collected for the needs assessment Superintendent and Cabinet AUGUST 1993 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Establish final Budget Calendar for 1994-95 that will allow the Board to monitor progress of the planning and budgeting process Superintendent Begin to develop monitoring and reporting procedures and issue instructions, as needed. Superintendent and Cabinet Begin development of proportional allocation fojrmulas Superintendent and Cabinet Begin data collection Lead Planning Person Begin to identify programs for \"fast-track\" evaluation Complete Desegregation Program Inventory Superintendent and Cabinet Superintendent and Cabinet kATTACHMENT 4 P. 2 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 SEPTEMBER 1993 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Conduct work session for analysis of collected data * Develop preliminary list of issues for needs assessment * Identify the need for program modification or development Conduct Board work session * Review preliminary list of issues for needs assessment * Review Desegregation Program Inventory Report * Review and revise, if necessary, the mission statement. * Establish tentative written goals/obj ectives. * Establish written priorities. * Review and provide guidance related to proportional allocation formulas * Consider strategies for funding shortfall * Identify any additional programs for \"fast-track\" evaluation (End of first quarter reporting period.) Superintendent and Cabinet Board and Superintendent ATTACHMENT 4 P. 3 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 OCTOBER 1993 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSONfS) Begin necessary program modification or development Cabinet and Program Manager Begin to generate broad-based input for budget process Superintendent and Director of Communications Issue first quarter FY 1993-94 cycle monitoring and evaluation report (Program Budget Document) Controller Lead Planning Person NOVEMBER 1993 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Complete the gathering of broad-based input for budget process Complete identification of proportional allocation formulas and exceptions Complete Needs Assessment listing using information gathered from broad-based input sessions. Finalize program objectives and evaluation criteria for each desegregation program. Complete inventory list of non-desegregation programs Status report to Board on Budget Process Superintendent and Director of Communications Superintendent Superintendent and Cabinet Superintendent and Cabinet Superintendent and Cabinet Superintendent and Lead Planning Person ATTACHMENT 4 P. 4 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 I DECEMBER 1993 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Prepare initial financial forecast for next and out years Controller Issue directions for budget preparation Superintendent Manager Resources and School Support Controller Budget managers submit request for 1994-95 school year Manager Resources and School Support Controller Begin developing program budget document Controller (End of second quarter reporting period.) JANUARY 1994 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Complete fast-track evaluations Lead Planning Person Cabinet Begin Budget Development Manager of Resources and School Support Controller Complete modifications or program development for submission to Superintendent and Cabinet Submit program modifications and development to Board Issue second quarter FY 1993-94 cycle monitoring and evaluation report (Program Budget Document) Program Managers in Curriculum, Desegregation, and Resources and School Support Superintendent Controller and Lead Planning Person ATTACHMENT 4 P. 5 FEBRUARY 1994 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Continue Budget Development Controller Continue developing the program budget document Controller MARCH 1994 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Revise financial forecast Controller Revise the program budget document Controller Provide feedback to input participants Superintendent and Director of Communications (End of third quarter reporting period.) ATTACHMENT 4 P. 6 APRIL 1994 ACTIVITY PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Complete program budget document Controller Submit proposed budget to Board Superintendent Conduct Board work session on budget Superintendent and Board Revise budget as needed Superintendent and Cabinet Certified personnel reduction deadline Superintendent Issue third quarter FY 1993-94 cycle monitoring and evaluation report (Program Budget Document) Controller and Lead Planning Person MAY 1994 ACTIVITY Revise budget as needed RESPONSIBLE PERSONfS) Superintendent and Cabinet Board work session on budget, if needed Approval of tentative budget Classified personnel reduction deadline Reassess planning organization for FY 1994-95 cycle Begin FY 1994-95 cycle needs assessment Begin program inventory for FY 1994-95 Superintendent and Cabinet Board and Superintendent Superintendent Superintendent and Cabinet Lead planning person Lead planning person ATTACHMENT 4 P. 7 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 JUNE 1994 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Revise budget as needed Superintendent and Cabinet Continue FY 1994-95 cycle needs assessment Lead planning person Continue FY 1994-95 cycle program inventory Lead planning person (End fourth quarter reporting period.) JULY 1994 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Adopt Budget Board Conduct Board work session on planning and budgeting to include: Board and Superintendent A A A A defining tentative goals defining guidelines on broad-based input designing tentative planning and budget development calendar defining any \"fast-track\" evaluations Continue FY 1994-95 cycle needs assessment Lead planning person Continue FY 1994-95 cycle program inventory Lead planning person Issue fourth quarter FY 1993-94 cycle monitoring and evaluation report Controller and Lead Planning Person ATTACHMENT 4 P. 8 PROPOSED BUDGET CALENDAR 1993-94 AUGUST 1994 ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE PERSON(S) Submit 1994-95 budget to Arkansas Department of Education Superintendent Establish final Budget Calendar for FY 1994-95 cycle Superintendent Continue FY 1994-95 cycle needs assessment Lead planning person Complete FY 1994-95 cycle program inventory (Program Budget Document) Lead planning person Program Seq #: Program Name: Program Code\nProgram DeacrlpUon: District Goal Support: Program Ob(ecllve: Plan Relerencea: FY Program Budget: YTD Expcndlturea\nATTACHMENT 5 LRSD FY 93-94 TENTATIVE PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Primary Leader\nSecondary Leader Page: 1 Revision Date:  tat Qtr Expend: 2nd Qtr Expend\n3rd Qtr Expend: 4th Qtr Expend\nProgram Seq #: Program Nome: Program Code: Program Ob)ecllve: Plan Reference Page Number Oblectives LRSD FY 93-94 TENTATIVE PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Primary Leader: Secondary Leader: Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date ATTACHMENT 5 p.2 Page\n2 Revision Date: Responsibil ity Evaluation CriteriaI I\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"auu_auc-098_auc-098-0028","title":"\"A Daughter of Slavery Makes the Senate Listen\", July 23, 1993","collection_id":"auu_auc-098","collection_title":"Johnson Publishing Company Clipping Files Collection","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, New York, New York County, New York, 40.7142691, -74.0059729"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1993-07-23"],"dcterms_description":["\"A Daughter of Slavery Makes the Senate Listen\" article on Carol Moseley-Braun speaking to the senate about opposing the defense of the American flag."],"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Johnson Publishing Company Clipping Files Collection||http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12322/fa:098"],"dcterms_subject":["African Americans--Civil rights","African Americans--Politics and government","Political participation","Voting","African American women"],"dcterms_title":["\"A Daughter of Slavery Makes the Senate Listen\", July 23, 1993"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Atlanta University Center Robert W. Woodruff Library"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12322/auc.098:0028"],"dcterms_temporal":["1990/1999"],"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["articles"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1422","title":"Report: ''Monitoring Report: Pulaski County Special School District School Racial Balance,'' Office of Desegregation Monitoring, United States District Court, Little Rock, Ark.","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)"],"dc_date":["1993-07-19"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School enrollment","School integration","School management and organization"],"dcterms_title":["Report: ''Monitoring Report: Pulaski County Special School District School Racial Balance,'' Office of Desegregation Monitoring, United States District Court, Little Rock, Ark."],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1422"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":["192 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"gsu_ajc_12754","title":"Nelson Mandela with Atlanta Mayor Maynard Jackson, 1993","collection_id":"gsu_ajc","collection_title":"Atlanta Journal-Constitution Photographs","dcterms_contributor":["Bridges, W. A. (William Anderson), 1949-"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Georgia, Fulton County, Atlanta, 33.749, -84.38798"],"dcterms_creator":["Atlanta Journal-Constitution"],"dc_date":["1993-07-10"],"dcterms_description":["Printed on back: \"Mayor Maynard Jackson and his daughter Alexandra greet Nelson Mandela at Fulton County Airport on 7-10-1993. W. A. Bridges Staff. Jackson, Maynard Atlanta Mayor 1993\" Caption: \"When Nelson Mandela arrived in July, Jackson was back before the cameras with daughter Alexandra. Monday October 11, 1993 JC\""],"dc_format":["image/jp2"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":null,"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Atlanta Journal-Constitution Photographic Archive;","Photographic Collections;"],"dcterms_subject":["Mayors","Politicians","Presidents","Civil rights workers"],"dcterms_title":["Nelson Mandela with Atlanta Mayor Maynard Jackson, 1993"],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Georgia State University. Special Collections"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://digitalcollections.library.gsu.edu/cdm/ref/collection/ajc/id/12754"],"dcterms_temporal":["1990/1999"],"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":["Cite as: AJCP432-031a, Atlanta Journal-Constitution Photographic Archives. Special Collections and Archives, Georgia State University Library."],"dlg_local_right":["Copyright to items in this collection is owned by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Items may be used for scholarship, educational, and personal use. Additional uses will require permission of the rights holder."],"dcterms_medium":["color photographs"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Jackson, Maynard, 1938-2003","Mandela, Nelson, 1918-2013","Jackson, Alexandra, 1984-"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1275","title":"Proceedings: ''Budget Hearing,'' Little Rock School District budget","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1993-07-08"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Education--Arkansas","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Court records"],"dcterms_title":["Proceedings: ''Budget Hearing,'' Little Rock School District budget"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1275"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["legal documents"],"dcterms_extent":["45 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1253","title":"Proceedings: ''Budget Hearing,'' Pulaski County Special School District budget","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1993-07-07"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Education--Arkansas","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Court records"],"dcterms_title":["Proceedings: ''Budget Hearing,'' Pulaski County Special School District budget"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1253"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["legal documents"],"dcterms_extent":["12 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"umc_awr_50466","title":"Ad Hoc Labor Committee Meeting, July 1993","collection_id":"umc_awr","collection_title":"Advancing Workers’ Rights in the American South","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1993-07"],"dcterms_description":["Folder of materials from the \"National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, 1956-1999\" series from the AFL-CIO Civil Rights Department records"],"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["Civil rights","Labor movement"],"dcterms_title":["Ad Hoc Labor Committee Meeting, July 1993"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["University of Maryland, College Park. Libraries"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["https://hdl.handle.net/1903.1/50466"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["records (documents)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1553","title":"Court filings concerning legal fees, Ish Incentive School closure, North Little Rock School District planning and integration, and Little Rock School District planning","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1993-07"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Pulaski Association of Classroom Teachers (PACT)","Little Rock School District","Arkansas. Department of Education","North Little Rock High School (North Little Rock, Ark.)","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Education--Economic aspects","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School management and organization","School facilities","School integration","School improvement programs","School enrollment","Ish Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings concerning legal fees, Ish Incentive School closure, North Little Rock School District planning and integration, and Little Rock School District planning"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1553"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["legal documents"],"dcterms_extent":["80 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"gsl_borm_borm1993-1994","title":"Minutes, Board of Regents, 1993-1994, July 1, 1993-June 30, 1994","collection_id":"gsl_borm","collection_title":"Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia Meeting Minutes, 1932-2005","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Georgia, Fulton County, Atlanta, 33.749, -84.38798"],"dcterms_creator":["Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia"],"dc_date":["1993-07-01/1994-06-30"],"dcterms_description":["Meeting minutes and agendas of the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia. Digitization of this collection is a project of the Georgia Public Library Service, a unit of the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, in association with the University System. The project is supported with federal LSTA funds administered by the Institute of Museum and Library Services."],"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia Meeting Minutes, 1932-2005"],"dcterms_subject":["Education, Higher--United States--Administration","Universities and colleges","Schools","University System of Georgia. Board of Regents","Minutes (Records)","Agendas (Series)"],"dcterms_title":["Minutes, Board of Regents, 1993-1994, July 1, 1993-June 30, 1994"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia"],"edm_is_shown_by":["https://dlg.galileo.usg.edu/do:gsl_borm_borm1993-1994"],"edm_is_shown_at":["https://dlg.usg.edu/record/gsl_borm_borm1993-1994"],"dcterms_temporal":["1993-07-01/1994-06-30"],"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":["Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia Meeting Minutes, 1932-2005. Office of Legal Affairs, Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, Atlanta, Georgia."],"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["minute books"],"dcterms_extent":["559 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_926","title":"''Status Report,'' North Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1993-07/1993-09"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School discipline","School employees","School enrollment","School facilities","School improvement programs","Student activities","Student assistance programs","Gifted persons"],"dcterms_title":["''Status Report,'' North Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/926"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1125","title":"Little Rock School District Court Submission","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1993-06-30"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Little Rock (Ark.). Office of Desegregation Monitoring","Educational statistics"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District Court Submission"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1125"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\n/ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 COURT SUBMISSION JUNE 30, 1993 \u0026lt;l Little Rock School District Mr. Chris Heller Friday, Eldredge and Clark 2000 First Commercial Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Chris: June 30, 1993 This document represents the updated 1993-94 tentative budget as requested in Judge Wright's order of June 15, 1993. Each section that has been revised since the April 26, 1993 document either by court order or by suggestions from the Office of Desegregation Monitoring is included in this submission. Columns for FTE's and 1992-93 unaudited actual expenses (through May 31 , 1993) have been added where ordered. A new section has been inserted to include revenue and expense projections for the next five years presented in a format to include three scenarios. A final budget document will be produced once the District's books have been closed for the 1992-93 fiscal year and Judge Wright has issued any orders that may generate changes. s~~\nrJ~ ~ / // f /~4d4 //M~o.~:~ Controller MDM/cfh 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501).374-3.361 .., 0. lj 1-. ~ 1-, Iii' (l LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1991-94 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE PROJECTION (DRAFT 5) 06-30-93 ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROPOSED BUDGET REVISED 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 REVISIONS 1993-94 REVENUE-LOCAL SOURCES CURRENT TAXES 31,899,357 38,196,979 39,088,120 41,027,982 41,027,982 40% PULLBACK 20,601,593 21,081,833 21,694,576 21,420,949 21,420,949 DELINQUENT TAXES 3,214,974 4,250,186 4,250,186 4,277,692 225,000 4,502,692 EXCESS TREASURERS FEES 118,998 140,858 140,000 145,690 145,690 DEPOSITORY INTEREST 317,646 241,476 300,000 303,000 303,000 REVENUE IN LIEU OF TAXES 120,412 224,667 224,667 245,162 245,162 MISC. AND RENTS 317,978 406,878 461,000 484,050 484,050 INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 141,376 354,446 300,000 350,000 350,000 ATHLETIC RECEIPTS 91,322 100,857 100,857 102,874 102,874 TOTAL 56,823,656 64,998,180 66,559,406 68,357,399 225,000 68,582,399 REVENUE - COUNTY SOURCES COUNTY GENERAL 73,971 73,419 73,419 73,419 73,419 SEVERANCE TAX 16,232 15,350 11,000 18,000 18,000 TOTAL 90,203 88,769 84,419 91,419 91,419 REVENUE - STA TE SOURCES MFPA 22,037,764 27,264,460 27,042,713 27,142,713 27,142,713 SETTLEMENT PROCEEDS 10,356,778 8,637,482 8,926,606 8,094,112 8,094,112 SETTLEMENT LOAN 6,000,000 4,500,000 1,500,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 APPORTIONMENT 73,971 73,426 73,419 0 0 VOCATIONAL 1,265,710 1,513,699 1,341,887 1,341,887 1,341,887 HANDICAPPED CHILDREN 602,063 824,870 821,449 1,210,000 1,210,000 EARLY CHILDHOOD 0 147,050 229,403 240,873 240,873 ORPHAN CHILDREN 8,820 3,000 3,000 3,000 540 3,540 TRANSPORTATION 2,885,960 2,379,879 2,692,563 2,700,000 2,700,000 COMPENSATORY EDUCATION 609,943 858,743 548,034 575,435 575,435 M TO M TRANSFERS 1,007,481 1,770,486 2,490,900 2,883,425 2,883,425 ADULT EDUCATION 624,119 697,589 697,589 768,715 768,715 TOTAL 45,472,609 48,670,684 46,367,563 47,960,160 540 47,960,700 REVENUE - OTHER SOURCES PUBLIC LAW 874 28,585 9,385 40,000 30,000 10,000 40,000 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUNDS 95,588 129,428 262,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 TRANSFER FROM BOND ACCT 613,166 394,675 600,000 400,000 100,000 500,000 TOTAL 737,339 533,488 902,000 1,680,000 110,000 1,790,000 TOTAL REVENUE OPERATING 103,123,807 114,291,121 113,913,388 118,088,978 335,540 118,424,518 r LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1991-94 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE PROJECTION (DRAFT 5) 06-30-93 ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET PROPOSED 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 REVENUE-FEDERAL GRANTS CHAPTER I 2,886,618 3,275,099 4,288,755 4,288,755 CHAPTER II 227,900 224,423 215,020 215,020 TITLEVI B 468,964 558,810 589,011 589,011 OTHER 974,090 1,164,511 1,186,464 1,186,464 TOTAL 4,557,572 5,222,843 6,279,250 6,279,250 REVENUE-MAGNET SCHOOLS STATE/LOCAL 12,571,785 13,887,841 14,278,796 14,707,160 TOTAL 12,571,785 13,887,841 14,278,796 14,707,160 TOTAL REVENUE 120,253,164 133,401,805 134,471,434 139,075,388 EXPENSES SALARIES 56,996,869 65,368,035 65,063,011 67,397,356 BENEFITS 7,312,664 8,020,788 8,862,732 8,934,265 DESEGREGATION 14,598,558 15,997,240 17,012,939 18,207,812 SERVICES,SUPP ,EQUIP 17,053,677 15,267,935 14,236,764 14,638,463 DEBT SERVICE 6,646,769 7,950,100 9,597,115 8,870,123 CONTINGENCY 0 0 500,000 1,000,000 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 102,608,537 112,604,098 115,272,561 119,048,019 EXPENSES-FEDERAL GRANTS 4,369,442 5,111,131 6,764,930 6,279,250 EXPENSES-MAGNET SCHOOLS 12,571,785 13,887,841 14,278,796 14,707,160 TOTAL EXPENSES , 119,549,764 131,603,070 136,316,287 140,034,429 INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE 703,400 1,798,735 {1,844,853) (959,042) BEGINNING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL 185,838 373,968 485,680 0 OPERATING 119,574 634,844 2,321,867 962,694 ENDING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL 373,968 485,680 0 0 OPERATING 634,844 2,321,867 962,694 3,652 TOTAL 1,008,812 2,807,547 962,694 3,653 BUDGET REVISIONS 335,540 383,002 37,460 307,913 (628,459) 99,916 99,916 235,624 235,624 REVISED 1993-94 4,288,755 215,020 589,01  I 1,186,464 6,279,250 14,707,160 14,707,160 139,410,928 67,780,358 8,971,725 18,515,725 14,010,004 8,870,123 1,000,000 119,147,935 6,279,250 14,707,160 140,134,345 (723,417) 0 962,694 0 239,277 239,277 a I I I I I Date: 06/28/93 Time: 21:05 CERTIFIED UllU REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0115 CERTIFIED INSTRUCT. ASST. 0117 STIPENDS 0130 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS-SHORT 0135 SUBST. CERTIFIED LONG TER CERTIFIED NON-CERT IF I ED 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0121 MAINTENANCE 0124 CLERICAL OVERTIME 0140 SUBST NON-CERTIFIED-SHORT 0145 SUBST. NON-CERTIFIED LONG NON-CERTIFIED BENEFITS Ut.lU SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 0240 INSURANCE 0250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0290 OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS BENEFITS PURCHASED SERVICES 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0311 INSTRUCTION SERVICES 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROG IMPROV 0313 PUPIL SERVICES 0314 STAFF SERVICES 0316 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 0318 BOARD OF ED SERVICES 0319 OTHER PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH 0321 UTILITY SERVICES-NATURAL 0322 UTILITY SERVICES-ELECTRIC 0323 UTlllTY SER-~ATER/SE~AGE/ 0324 CLEANING SERVICES 0325 REPAIRS-BUILDINGS 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0327 RENTAL OF LAND \u0026amp; BUILDING 0328 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT \u0026amp; VEH 0329 OTHER PROPERTY SERVICES 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0332 TRAVEL-PAYROLL 0333 TRAVEL 0334 OFF I CE EXPENSES Page 1 TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL Little Rock School District Line I tern (Object) Sl.lTlll8ry Actual 1991/92 ,..,.\u0026gt;,ooY,6Z6. 75 $8,212.70 S1,229,076.61 S871,099.40 $326,189.12 S56,324,204.58 S15,076,554.61 S1,129,828.37 S91,812.91 S540,253.81 S28,557.67 S16,867,007.37 S5,570,','U~.fll SO.DO S171,904.40 $3,036,037.39 S153,797.29 S60,097 .43 S8,992,742.29 $327,016.05 SlJ,309.42 Sl,052,785.32 S44,070.20 S40.00 S7,529.35 S57,237.67 S91, 162.34 S563,340.02 S2,651,690.07 S173,066.98 SO.DO S519,413.12 S470,552.36 S50,770.81 S23,214.29 S126,364.09 S710,448.27 S2,555.64 S92, 165.12 ($80.00) Budget 1992/93 ,..\u0026gt;.\u0026gt;,O'J' I ,O'J'0.08 SO.DO S1 ,743,639.54 S900,000.00 SO.DO S56,335,335.62 S16,818, 713.84 SO.DO SO.DO S350,000.00 SO.DO S17, 168,713.84 S9, r t.ll, r t.ll.24 S0.00 SO.DO S0.00 S160,000.00 S73,462.00 S9,962, 190.24 S586,390.00 Sl,000.00 S691,900.00 SO.DO S2,000.00 S0.00 S366,862.00 S70,000.00 S28,000.00 S3,531,500.00 S5,500.00 S15,000.00 S501,558.00 S596,964.28 S42,000.00 S18,464.00 S275,500.00 S562,036.00 S21, 120.00 S73,600.00 SO.OD Budget 1993/94 ,..,.,.,341,853.0J SO.DO S453,431.31 S926,321.00 SO.DO S60,721,605.34 S15, 132,521.65 S1, 136,945.28 SO.DO S416,844.45 SO.DO S16,686,311.38 SS,498,155.35 S6,882.48 S148, 194. 77 S4,343, 130.04 S195,000.00 S60,000.00 Sl0,251,362.64 S621,800.00 S21,015.00 S761,357 .00 S53,440.00 Sl,000.00 SO.OD S752,500.00 S72,100.00 S826 ,700. 00 S2,879, 165.00 S209,950.00 S400,000.00 S200, 300. 00 S506,300.09 S135, 700.00 S15,050.00 S128,650.00 S633,067.30 $24,160.00 S71,343.63 SO.OD Date: 06/28/93 Time: 21 :05 0339 OTHER TRANSPORTATION SERV 0341 TELEPHONE 0342 POSTAGE 0350 ADVERTISING 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING ANO BINOING-EXTE 0362 FREE PRINTED ITEMS 0365 COPIER LEASE 0370 lUIT JON 0380 FOCO SERVICES 0390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES PURCHASED SERVICES MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES 0409 SUPPLIES 0410 SUPPLIES 0411 SUPPLIES - SP TRACKING 0412 LOCAL SUPPLIES SP TRACKIN 0413 SOFT\\IARE 0414 SUPPLIES 0415 TEST MATERIALS 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0417 SUPPLIES-SUPPLY CENTER 0420 TEXTBOOKS 0421 TEXTBOOKS - LOCAL SOURCES 0430 LIBRARY BOOKS 0431 LIBRARY REFERENCE MATERIA 0435 0440 PERIOOICALS 0450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0451 AUDIO-VISUAL MATERIALS 0481 PLUMBING 0482 CARPENTRY 0483 ELECTRIC 0485 AIR CONO/HEAT 0486 BOILERS/SH ENGINES 0488 PAINTING 0489 ROOFING 0490 OTHER SUPPLIES 0491 UNIFORMS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 0492 STADIUM OPERATIONS 0494 GAME RELATED EXPENSES 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES CAPTI Al OUT LAY 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER Page 2 TOTAL TOTAL little Rock School District line Item (Object) SUllll8ry Actual 1991/92 Sl,430.88 $336,319.73 $91,358.85 $31,382.16 $109,846.69 $120,347.36 S0.00 $419,811.22 $719,470.11 $138,895.91 $90,673.50 S9, 036, 187. 53 S0.00 S1, 929,459.75 Sl,083,539.56 S46,338.38 $253,368.81 $8,107.60 S112,075.84 S0.00 S0.00 ($10.95) $305,577.99 $786.12 $15,527.70 S0.00 $11,275.65 $3,675.18 S6,788.91 S3,326.06 $1,649.24 S8,319.48 S6,972.10 $17,583.01 $3,637.83 S1 ,350. 78 $10,468.47 $110,144.08 $68,869.93 Sl,928.82 S0.00 S4,010 760.34 si ,422,531.06 Budget 1992/93 $0.00 S311,000.00 $96,893.00 $24,950.00 $188,419.20 $169,954.00 S500.00 $470,000.00 $476,187.20 $168,923.00 $32,000.00 S9,328,220.68 S0.00 $1,217,253.12 $798,339.00 S22, 168.00 S54,500.00 SO.OD S53,950.00 $391,889.00 S1,985.00 S955,000.00 $166,200.00 $1,060.00 S0.00 S3,000.00 $45,081.00 $6,830.00 S50,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 $0.00 $0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $0.00 Sl,000.00 S88, 130.00 S71,820.00 S2, 160.00 SO.OD $3,930,365.12 $492,724.84 Budget 1993/94 $0.00 $386,500.00 S99, 273. 70 $18,006.00 $151,399.89 $153,645.50 $515.00 $5'03,000.00 $945,000.00 $190,062.69 S59,380.00 $10,820,380.80 $0.00 $1,415,208.71 $784,000.00 S30,672.04 $33,405.00 S2,000.00 S53,000.00 S470, 112.22 S2,044.55 S981,500.00 S362,677.50 $1,120.80 S0.00 S2,000.00 S26,498.35 S2,150.40 $30,000.00 $0.00 S0.00 $0.00 S0.00 S15,000.00 S0.00  S0.00 Sl0,300.00 $80,974.40 S71,275.80 S2,224.80 S1,200.00 $4,377,364.57 $689,547.50 Date: 06/28/93 Time: 21 :05 0541 EQUIPMENT PER PROP SP TRA 0542 EQUIPMENT (NOT INVENTORIE 0543 EQUIPMENT (REAL PROPERTY) 0545 EQUIPMENT LEASE PURCHASE 0548 EQUIPMENT - SUPPLY CENTER 0550 VEHICLES 0551 VEHICLES LEASE PURCHASE CAPTIAL OUTLAY OTHER OBJECTS 0610 RED EMPT ION OF PRINCIPAL 0620 INTEREST 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 0635 DUES \u0026amp; FEES - NCA 0640 INSURANCE 0641 PROPERTY INSURANCE 0642 LIABILITY INSURANCE 0649 OTHER INSURANCE 0660 IMPROVEMENT TAX 0690 OTHER EXPENSES OTHER OBJECTS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Page 3 TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL Little Rock School District Line Item (Object) SU11118ry Actual 1991/92 $35,417.01 $836.27 $91,527.78 $1,350,643.15 SO.DO $152,106.60 $906,669.49 $3 959 731. 36 $3,393,324.59 $4,904,977.12 $54,716.42 $12,950.00 $1,196,236.20 $50,000.00 $1,817.08 $51,804.85 $8,971.34 $3,738,667.07 $13,413,464.67 $112,604,098.14 Budget 1992/93 SO.DO $0.00 $92,000.00 $1,489,020.00 $136,302.00 $0.00 $910,000.00 $3 120 046.84 $4,597,115.00 $5,000,000.00 $40,645.00 $26,000.00 $1,018,440.00 $0.00 $0.00 $54,775.00 $0.00 $4,690,713.00 $15,427,688.00 $115,272,560.34 $1 Budget 1993/94 $10,000.00 SO.DO $60,000.00 $926,742.00 $52,093.00 $0.00 $0.00 738 382.50 $4,074,616.00 $4,785,507.40 $57,339.50 $17,000.00 $400,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $54,775.00 $15,000.00 $5,148,290.00 $14,552,527.90 $119,147,935.14 Date: 06/28/93 Time: 21:18 Little Rock School District Function Surmary Function Description 1105 FOUR YEAR OLD PROGRAM 1110 KINDERGARTEN 1120 ELEMENTARY 1125 ELEMENTARY MAGNET 1127 SPECIALTY PROGRAMS 1129 SPECIALTY PROGRAM 1130 MIDDLE\\JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 1132 JUNIOR HIGH 1135 JUNIOR HIGH MAGNET 1137 JUNIOR HIGH RESTRUCTURE 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 1145 HIGH SCHOOL MAGNET 1146 HIGH SCHOOL STANDARDS 1151 BOYS ATHLETICS 1152 GIRLS ATHLETICS 1154 FOOTBALL/MINOR SPORTS 1155 VOLLEYBALL 1156 BASKETBALL 1157 TRACK,TENNIS,GOLF \u0026amp; S~IMM 1158 BASEBALL 1190 OTHER REGULAR 1191 MULTI-ETHNIC PROGRAM 1193 TRAVELING TEACHERS 1195 ACCELERATED LEARNING 1196 ACCELERATED LEARNING 1199 SUBSTITUTES-INSTRUCTION 1210 ITINERANT INSTRUCTION 1220 RESOURCE ROOM 1230 SPECIAL CLASS 1240 HOMEBOUND AND HOSPITAL 1290 OTHER 1292 EXTENDED YEAR HAND. SERVI 1321 MARKETING/DIST EDCOOP 1322 MARKETING/DIST EDEXPL 1331 BUSINESS ED COOP 1332 BUSINESS ED EXPL 1333 BUSINESS ED-SKILL TR 1341 HEALTH COOP 1351 TRADE \u0026amp; INDCOOP 1352 TRADE \u0026amp; INDEXPL 1353 TRADE \u0026amp; IND-SKILL TR 1354 YOUTH APPRENTICESHIP 1360 HOME ECONOMICS 1362 CONS/HMKG 1371 CAREER ORIENTATION 1392 COORD CAREER-COOP 1393 LOORD CAREEREXPL 1410 ADULT BASIC EDUCATION 1420 ADULT GENERAL EDUCATION 1430 ADULT VOCATIONAL PROGRAM 1440 SPECIAL PROJECTS 1445 IIORKPLACE LITERACY 1490 OTHER ADULT EDUCATION 1550 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION 1560 READING 1570 MATHEMATICS 1580 ACADEMIC PROGRESS GRANTS 1595 COMPENSATORY EDUCATION 1910 GIFTED ANO TALENTED 2111 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION 2113 SOCIAL IIORK SERVICES 2114 PUPIL ACCOUNTING SERVICES 2120 GUIDANCE SERVICES Page 1 Actual 1991/92 $312,429.70 S3, 107,993.07 $18,957,936.89 $24,950.47 S0.00 $978,337.42 SB, 134,324.61 S0.00 $71,943.05 $429,684.81 S7,856,636.53 S42, 226.16 $2,300.61 $42,098.02 $43,559.23 $47,638.98 $6,490.16 $42,794.32 S9,066.81 $8,946.68 $63,857.99 $690.88 $21,042.56 $2,283,175.79 $17,394.73 S1 ,393,301. 78 S943, 193 .30 S2,065,293.61 S1 ,253,039.78 S255,077.13 $823,730.20 S14, 151. 72 $197,722.24 S2,869.04 $191,121.48 $853,847.88 $970,157.41 $58,755.33 $193,754.91 $619,807.20 S1,016,956.63 $41,764.48 $38,946.63 $670,989.72 S230,724.89 $201,795.03 S0.00 $437,414.74 S186,704.13 S18,949.50 S28, 974. 75 S25 ,545. 75 S35 ,631 .06 S930,948.93 $11,216.41 S288,660.42 $658,575.23 $967,023.83 S1 ,327,011.59 S11,321.52 S0.00 $145,479.23 $1,561,832.32 Budget 1992/93 S1 ,479 ,804 .31 $3,253,398.91 $21,904,944.99 $265,892 . 02 S0.00 S0.00 S8, 635,782.29 S0.00 S212,863.97 $492,021.18 $8,264,041.10 $273,095.96 S0.00 $44,620.00 $13,230.00 $49,680.00 $7,200.00 $45,540.00 $11, 160.00 S10,800.00 $37,696.84 S0.00 s12,ooo.oo $2,275,181.26 S0.00 S1,096,370.00 S901,880.14 S2, 189,284.37 S1,296,582.62 S240,565.63 $435,287.20 S0.00 S194,886.18 S0.00 S190,480.17 S575,813.91 $965,541.57 S50,996.02 S189,221.26 $537,358.99 $852,818.65 $46,025.56 $36,683.42 $664,130.37 S224,651.50 $203,203.43 S21,518.34 $404,251.48 $180,760.35 S39,221.06 S10,001.85 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S280,068.49 $21,519.20 S320,000.00 $862,437.52 $646,481.75 S5, 150.00 S0.00 $14,700.00 $2,475,037.42 Budget 1993/94 S1 ,681,072.65 $3,328,323.45 $23,073,155.13 $173,979.01 S0.00 $86,475.45 $8,790,806.29 $26,783.84 S452, 190.06 $545,069.54 $8,780,756.57 $100,000.00 S0.00 S44, 797 .oo $4,798.20 $49,680.00 $7,416.00 $45,880.20 S11,354.40 $10,800.00 $18,697.00 S0.00 $15,000.00 $1,332,756.42 S0.00 $1,111,585.20 $1,147,624.46 $2,268,606.18 S1 ,377,005.08 S324,980.11 S997,814.22 S5,705.28 S208, 184.71 S0.00 S202,595.86 $652,853.50 S1 ,021, 150.81 S31,974.81 S204, 169 .82 $558,050.96 S933,655.63 S119,623.23 S0.00 S734,449.69 S250,098.90 S215,630.04 S0.00 $427,317.98 S328,075.39 $2,280.00 $953.04 S0.00 so.oo $245,468.62 S22,400.00 s12,ooo.oo S320,000.00 S1, 102,804.02 11,125,514.75 S5,150.00 $122,361.80 S123,025.50 $2,863,409.70 Date: 06/28/93 Time: 21:18 Little Rock School District Function SU11T\\ary Function Description 2121 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION 2122 COUNSELING SERVICES 2129 OTHER GUIDANCE SERVICES 2134 NURSING SERVICES 2142 PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING SER 2211 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION 2212 INSTRUCTION AND CURR DEV 2213 INSTRUCTIONAL STAFF TRAIN 2215 INST STAFF TRAINING TES 2216 INST STAFF TRAINING PET 2217 CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT 2218 PARTNERS IN EDUCATION 2219 OTHER IMPROVEMENT OF INST 2222 SCHOOL LIBRARY SERVICES 2223 AUDIOVISUAL SERVICES 2229 OTHER EDUCATIONAL MEDIAS 2310 BOARD OF EDUCATION SERVIC 2314 ELECTION SERVICES 2315 LEGAL SERVICES 2317 AUDIT SERVICES 2319 OTHER BOARD OF EDUCATION 2321 OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTEND 2326 DESEGREGATION 2410 OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL 2490 OTHER SUPPORT SERVICES 2510 DIRECTION OF BUSINESS SUP 2521 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION 2525 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING SERV 2529 OTHER FISCAL ACCOUNTINGS 2539 OTHER FACILITIES ACQ \u0026amp; CO 2541 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION 2542 UPKEEP OF BUILDINGS 2543 UPKEEP OF GROUNDS 2544 UPKEEP OF EQUIPMENT 2545 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 2546 SECURITY SERVICES 2548 ASBESTOS PROGRAM 2549 OTHER OPER \u0026amp; MAINT 2551 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION 2552 VEHICLE OPERATION 2553 MONITORING 2554 VEHICLE SERVICING 2572 PURCHASING SERVICES 2573 WAREHOUSING \u0026amp; DISTRIBUTIN 2574 PRINTING, PUB, \u0026amp; DUPLICAT 2585 SAFETY-DRUG TESTING 2587 SAFETY \u0026amp; SECURITY 2589 RISK MANAGEMENT 2590 OTHER SUPPORT SERVICES-BU 2610 DIR OF CENTRAL SUPPORT SE 2623 EVALUATION SERVICES 2632 INTERNAL INFORMATION SERV 2642 RECRUITMENT \u0026amp; PLACEMENTS 2649 OTHER STAFF SERVICES 2664 OPERATIONS 3100 DIRECTION OF COMMUNITY SE 3500 CUSTODY \u0026amp; CARE OF CHILD 3800 INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMS 3820 SUMMER SCHOOL 3900 OTHER COMMUNITY SERVICES 3909 DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION 3911 FAMILY LIFE EDUCATION NF 3916 IN-SCHOOL SUSPENSION Page 2 Actual 1991/92 S8,639.40 S1 ,261,361.90 S97,434.27 $791,264.86 S176,515.50 S719, 148. 16 S2, 142,689.55 S2,238.82 SO.OD ss, 110.19 $14,030.26 S19,373.TT S160,312.59 $2,603,586.90 $36,805.75 S76,000.00 $7,335.80 S0.00 S17,092.67 $40,145.00 $288,020.95 $299,408.55 $433,908.55 S5,965,386.34 S20,954.46 $68,273.22 $61,590.54 $322,743.14 $39,078.26 S282, 107 .60 $141,000.45 S9, 226,708. 98 S33,083.92 S21, 096.97 S72,039.62 $41,627.16 STT,068.61 $49,948.00 sss, 779.28 S3, 161,263.57 S321, 718. 14 S3, 199,247.83 S927,587.06 S28,662.15 S98,917.79 S14,588.24 S760,378.15 S1,325,111.52 so.co S497, 991.88 $571,953.63 S182,505.89 S345, 105.31 $92,350.86 S1 ,223,976.26 ($4.59) $117,854.64 $213,563.35 S28,2TT.44 $10,000.00 S73,488.04 $613,400.00 S188,224.19 Budget 1992/93 S12,850.00 SO.DO SO.DO $812,854.26 SO.OD S730,230.41 S2,505,932.99 S14,000.00 S25,000.00 S40,000.00 S13,000.00 SO.OD S182,022.60 S2,459,369.06 S0.00 S86,000.00 SO.OD S16,500.00 $75,000.00 S31,500.00 $281,462.00 S207,342.23 $424,832.88 SS,746,732.23 S28,000.00 $81,630.00 S0.00 $400,971.31 S0.00 S171,900.00 S0.00 S9, 927,586.43 S0.00 so.co so.co so.oo so.co S0.00 S18, 160.00 S3,500,688.20 so.co S3,227,601.09 S1 ,062, 193.80 S11,500.00 S115,000.00 S16,000.00 $754,228.30 S1, 137,255.98 S0.00 S220,363.00 S524, 133 .87 S217,071.80 $426,439.22 S0.00 S1,295,812.40 S115,000.00 S71,000.00 S196,000.00 S0.00 so.oo so.co $530,400.00 so.co Budget 1993/94 S10,850.00 S38,866.41 SO.OD $808,174.81 S197,617.81 $835,518.00 S2,093,315.15 S10 ,713. 11 S16,070.13 S32, 139.33 S10,713.11 S0.00 S119, 112.97 S2,428,502.46 $32,509.56 S86,000.00 S0.00 s20,ooo.oo $350,000.00 S35,000.00 S305, 100.00 S201,3TT.31 $427,921.09 $6,374,937.44 S11,000.00 S87,000.00 S57,833.96 S318,204.67 so.co S250,598.87 $225, 795. 75 S9,414,554.14 S18,000.00 S17,500.00 S76,000.00 S0.00 $69,557.00 S0.00 S21,325.55 $3,534,753.67 S322,795.40 S1,962,888.40 S1,019,468.79 S59,855.60 S126,500.00 S15,000.00 $870,597.06 $450,000.00 S171,500.00 $84,580.22 S518,678.84 S253,828.22 $413,294.28 S0.00 S1,730, 147.47 S220, 112.24 S87,TTO.OO S249,440.00 so.co S0.00 S92,582.42 S530,400.00 so.co Date: 06/28/93 Time: 21:18 Little Rock School District Function SU1111ary Function Description 4900 I OTHER NON-PROGRAMMED CHAR 5100 I BONDED INDEBTEDNESS 6000 I PROVISION FOR CONTINGENCI LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Page 3 Actual 1991/92 s3, n1, 111 .52 $7,950,100.01 $0.00 $112,604,098.14 Budget 1992/93 $3,800,000.00 $9,597,115.00 $700,000.00 $115,272,560.34 Budget 1993/94 $3,915,500.00 $8,870,123.40 s1,ooo,ooo.oo $119,147,935.14 - Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code Description Code Description 1105 FOUR YEAR OLD PROGRAM 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0130 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS-SHORT 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0311 INSTRUCTION SERVICES 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROG IMPROV 0327 RENTAL OF LAND \u0026amp; BUILDING 0332 TRAVEL-PAYROLL 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINOINGINTERN 0380 FOOD SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES SUPPLY CENTER 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0548 EQUIPMENT SUPPLY CENTER 0630 OUES \u0026amp; FEES 1105 FOUR YEAR OLD PROGRAM TOTALS Page - Little Rock School District Program Budget  OOH Actual 1991/92 $160,0!!4.04 $133.50 $34,804.41 $417.58 $14,756.93 $9,407.17 $195.00 $650.00 $150.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $7,502.13 $75,122.58 S0.00 $8,516.36 S0.00 S90.00 $312,429.70 Budget 1992/93 $623,446.00 S0.00 $549,439.67 $0.00 $204,639.64 S0.00 S500.00 $0.00 S0.00 $1,000.00 Sl,000.00 Sl,500.00 S0.00 $2,123.00 $40,800.00 $5,200.00 $38,656.00 $11,500.00 S0.00 Sl ,479.804.31 Actual 1992/93 $545,954. 73 S0.00 $238,247.19 S0.00 $59,997.89 $56,027.05 $2,220.35 $4,365.37 S0.00 $509.04 $2,469.00 $532.16 $929.22 $22,195.51 $20,420.00 $3,364.59 $14,243.68 $4,871.27 S45.00 $976,392.05 Budget 1993/94 $974, {33.00 $21,770.40 $289,277.19 S0.00 $90,290.58 $89,110.48 $500.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $4,500.00 S0.00 S0.00 $37,186.69 $76,344.49 $2,709.82 $91,050.00 $3,600.00 S0.00 S1 ,681,072.65 - PROG: BU\u0026gt;004 FTE 1993/94 32.00 28.50 60.50 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code Description 1110 ICINDERGARTEII 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0410 SUPPLIES 0412 LOCAL SUPPLIES SP TRACKIN 0416 SUPPLIES SUPPLY CENTER 0417 SUPPLIES-SUPP~Y CENTER 1110 KINDERGARTEN TOTALS Page 2 little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 Budget 1992/93 $2,rou,904,00 S2,848,548.00 $211,208.33 $370,123.91 $107,742.53 S0.00 S15 123.15 $10,182.00 $13,015.06 $12,968.00 S0.00 $9,592.00 S0.00 Sl,985.00 S3 107 993.07 $3,253,398.91 Actual 1992/93 S2,t.u.,u.r .26 $175,356.70 $117,799.64 $12,508.04 $4,826.62 $3,774.55 $1,075.62 S2 607 568.43 Budget 1993/94 $2,932,915.50 S209, 147.91 $150,491.23 $10,487.46 $13,357.04 $9,879.76 $2,044.55 $3,328,323.45 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 9j.OO . 93.00  Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1120 ELEMENTARY 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0115 CERTIFIED INSTRUCT . ASST. 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0124 CLERICAL OVERTIME 0140 SUBST NON-CERTIFIED-SHORT 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 0240 INSURANCE 0290 OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 0311 INSTRUCTION SERVICES 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROG IMPROV 0313 PUPIL SERVICES 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0350 ADVERTISING 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING AND BINDING-EKTE 0365 COPIER LEASE 0380 FOOO SERVICES 0390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0420 TEXTBOOKS 0421 TEXTBOOKS - LOCAL SOURCES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0542 EQUIPMENT (NOT INVENTORIE 0548 EQUIPMENT - SUPPLY CENTER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 1120 ELEMENTARY TOTALS Page 3 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 S14,477,326.70 $8,212.70 S3,124.01 Sl,508, 152.07 SO.DO $44,534.64 Sl,227,137.90 SO.OD S437 .86 S767,930.87 S17.85 S0.00 Sl,486.50 SO.DO $6,809.32 $87,961.35 SO.OD $6,679.16 S5,574.58 S2,937.02 $809.23 S13,839.55 S26.35 Sl,402.00 S341,803. 14 S0.00 S0.00 S219,939.73 S231,063.45 S87.41 SO.OD $643.50 S18 957 936.89 Budget 1992/93 S16,554,844.80 SO.DO S422, 103.36 Sl,496,690.80 S0.00 SO.OD S2,295,506.03 SO.OD SO.OD S0.00 SO.DO SO.DO S400.00 SO.DO S16,050.00 S119,250.00 SO.DO S8,750.00 SO.OD S19,500.00 S750.00 SO.DO S42,000.00 S0.00 S185,300.00 S141,100.00 S475,000.00 S44,750.00 S78,950.00 SO.OD S4,000.00 SO.OD S21 904 944.99 Actual 1992/93 S12,002,277.00 S5,386.52 S514,218.60 Sl ,395, 651. 94 S27.98 S33,920.78 Sl,067,016.81 S4,515.59 S297.09 S837,051.68 SO.OD S372.33 SO.DO Sl,436.00 S3,968.46 S71,789.00 S21,542.38 S5,617.68 SO.DO S2,599. 77 Sl,436.98 SO.DO S73,727.09 $639.00 S119,528.29 S144, 754.19 SO.DO S20,962.41 $41,869.45 SO.OD S6,169.79 Sl,220. 00 S16,377,996.81 Budget 1993/94 S16, 958, 101.80 SO.DO S264,281.00 Sl, 791,271.76 SO.OD SO.OD Sl,413,049.48 S5,774.16 S534.92 Sl,225,085.68 SO.DO SO.DO $412.00 S0.00 S16,531.50 S104,802.50 SO.OD S9,012.50 SO.OD $8,725.00 S772.50 SO.OD S55,000.00 S0.00 S261,589.20 S126,961.14 $489,250.00 S246,162.50 S91,717.50 S0.00 S4, 120.00 SO.OD S23 073 155.13 PROO: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 536.00 247.00 783.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 FIXlCtion Object Code - Description Code - Description 1125 ELEMENTARY MAGNET 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0548 EQUIPMENT - SUPPLY CENTER 1125 ELEMENTARY MAGNET TOTALS Page 4 Little Rock School District Program Budget - DOM Actual 1991/92 so.oo S10, 117.75 SO.DO S774.05 SO.OD $4,002.45 S315.00 SO.OD S9, 741.22 S0.00 S24 950.47 Budget 1992/93 S115,l70.00 SO.OD $43,019.00 S24,103.02 SO.OD s10,ooo.oo S40,000.00 SJ,500.00 S30,000.00 S0.00 S265,892.02 Actual 1992/93 Sr5,325.86 $450.00 S22,190.84 ST,494.43 S6,232.35 SO.OD S200.00 S1 ,472.04 SO.DO S794.61 Sl 14 160.13 Budget 1993/94 S94,710.00 SO.OD S13, 132.45 S7,764. 79 $6,371.77 S5,000.00 S25,000.00 S2,000.00 s20,ooo.oo SO.OD S173 979.01 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 3.00 1.00 4.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1127 SPECIALTY PROGRAMS 0117 STIPENDS 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0380 FOOO SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 1127 SPECIALTY PROGRAMS TOTALS Page 5 little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 SO.OD SO.OD SO.DO SO.OD S0.00 SO.OD SO.DO Budget 1992/93 SO.OD SO.DO SO.OD SO.OD SO.OD S0.00 SO.DO Actual 1992/93 S745.00 S56.99 S1, 129.99 S345.56 S179.63 S781.56 S3 238.73 Budget 1993/94 SO.DO SO.DO S0.00 SO.DO S0.00 SO.OD SO.OD PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: D6/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1129 SPECIALTY PROGRAM 0117 STIPENDS 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 1129 SPECIALTY PROGRAM TOTALS Page 6 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $908,803.26 $69,523.63 $10.53 S978 337.42 Budget 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 Budget 1993/94 S75,000.00 $11,475.45 S0.00 $86,475.45 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1130 MIDDLE\\JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0240 INSURANCE 0313 PUPIL SERVICES 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0342 POSTAGE 0350 ADVERTISING 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING AND BINDING-EXTE 0362 FREE PRINTED ITEMS 0365 COPIER LEASE 0380 FOOD SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0421 TEXTBOOKS - LOCAL SOURCES 0440 PERIOOICALS 0450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0491 UNIFORMS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0541 EQUIPMENT PER PROP SP TRA 0542 EQUIPMENT (NOT INVENTORIE 0548 EQUIPMENT - SUPPLY CENTER 1130 MIDDLE\\JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS Page 7 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $6,993,774.56 S9,871.65 S122,710.09 S545, 139. 94 S0.00 S280,979.39 SO.DO S5,084.57 S5,069.80 Sl0,595.02 S0.00 S5,332.50 S4, 799.94 S0.00 Sl0,268.89 Sl.45 Slll,654.96 S0.00 S5,993.57 S571.90 S161.30 S229.74 S21,586.24 S432.00 $67 .10 SO.DO S8 134.324.61 Budget 1992/93 $6,~.606.20 S504,885.62 S158,482.50 S912,355.97 S0.00 S0.00 SO.OD S8, 178.00 S8,000.00 S8,090.00 S0.00 S16,500.00 S4,000.00 S500.00 SO.OD S0.00 S68,600.00 S47,000.00 S17,500.00 S900.00 S500.00 S500.00 S14, 184.00 SO .OD SO.OD S5,000.00 S8 635.782.29 Actual 1992/93 $6,006,367.84 S200.00 S95,561.34 $466,436.19 S229.45 S314,857.39 S104.00 S3,811.15 S3,150.20 S5,815.17 S681.60 S2,406.65 S4, 133.93 S102.41 SO.DO S0.00 S46,432 .11 S53,397.68 S2,437.67 S133.60 S0.00 S181.25 S22,916.13 S0.00 SO.DO S12,429.71 S7,041,785.47 Budget 1993/94 S7,540,908.27 SO.OD S104,817.29 S545,813.49 S0.00 $400,054.23 S0.00 $8,038.84 S8,210.00 $8,317.70 SO.OD S7,680.00 $6,620.00 S515.00 SO.DO S0.00 S73,946.46 $48,410.00 S15,860.00 S927.00 S515.00 S515.00 S14,508.00 SO.OD SO.OD S5,150.00 S8 790,806.29 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 l45.20 10.00 255.20 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1132 JUNIOR HIGH 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 1132 JUNIOR HIGH TOTALS Page 8 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 Budget 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 SO.DO S0.00 Actual 1992/93 $4,882.45 $373.53 $284.44 S5 540.42 Budget 1993/94 $23,527.00 Sl,677.73 Sl,579.11 $26 783.84 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 1.00 1.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1135 JUNIOR HIGH MAGNET 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROG IMPROV 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0333 TRAVEL 0350 ADVERTISING 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0362 FREE PRINTED ITEMS 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0420 TEXTBOOKS 0421 TEXTBOOKS - LOCAL SOURCES 0450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0483 ELECTRIC 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0548 EQUIPMENT SUPPLY CENTER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 1135 JUNIOR HIGH MAGNET TOTALS Page 9 Little Rock School District Program Budget - ODM Actual 1991/92 S0.00 $238.75 $18.27 S0.00 $450.00 $1,580.20 $3,938.96 $1,506.99 S0.00 S0.00 $26,272.33 S0.00 S0.00 S627.32 S0.00 S0.00 $34,683.80 S0.00 $2,626.43 S71 943.05 Budget 1992/93 $119,727.20 S0.00 S7,136.77 S0.00 S0.00 S5,000.00 $5,000.00 S5,000.00 S1,000.00 S0.00 $16,000.00 $14,000.00 S5,000.00 $16,000.00 $3,000.00 S0.00 S10,000.00 S5,000.00 S1,000.00 $212,863.97 Actual 1992/93 $33,002.54 SO.OD $2,524.70 $1,504.78 SO.DO $317.00 $1,334.70 S0.00 S610.00 S276.01 $23,890.05 S3, 121.19 S0.00 $4,321.95 so.oo $84.40 $39, 123.14 $3,764.33 S1 ,701.00 $115,575.79 Budget 1993/94 $349,064.10 S0.00 $2,484.93 $1,641.04 SO.OD S2,000.00 $3,000.00 $2,000.00 S1,000.00 S0.00 $28,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 so.oo S0.00 $49,000.00 $3,000.00 $2,000.00 S452, 190.06 PROO: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 1.00 1.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 FLnCtion Object Code - Description Code - Description 1137 JUNIOR HIGH RESTRUCTURE 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0410 SUPPLIES 1137 JUNIOR HIGH RESTRUCTURE TOTALS Page 10 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 $360,111.03 $27,548.18 $16,405.96 $25,619.64 $429,684.81 Budget 1992/93 $431,477.00 $60,544.18 S0.00 S0.00 $492,021.18 Actual 1992/93 J3\\lj, rr2.93 $30,123.70 $24,263.31 $0.00 $448,159.94 Budget 1993/94 $480,373.84 $34,491.95 $30,203.75 $0.00 $545,069.54 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 18.00 18.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fl.a'letion Object Code Description Code Description 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0124 CLERICAL OVERTIME 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 0240 INSURANCE 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROG IMPROV 0322 UTILITY SERVICES-ELECTRIC 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING AND BINDINGEXTE 0365 COPIER LEASE 0380 FOOO SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0412 LOCAL SUPPLIES SP TRACKIN 0416 SUPPLIES SUPPLY CENTER 0420 TEXTBOOKS 0421 TEXTBOOKS LOCAL SOURCES 0491 UNIFORMS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0548 EQUIPMENT SUPPLY CENTER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 1140 HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS Page 11 Little Rock School District Program Budget ODM Actual 1991/92 $6,490,560.23 S0.00 S137,858.55 S0.00 $507,043.92 S0.00 so.oo $251,408.56 $14,209.44 S224,508.TT S0.00 SS,974.47 S2,486.20 S261.21 $9,661.83 SS,304.53 S2,500.00 $3,114.59 S2.50 $125,476.61 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $35,651.62 S567.89 $39,660.61 S0.00 S385.00 S7 856 636.53 Budget 1992/93 S6, 146,122.20 S457, 719.49 S152, 134.00 S0.00 $790,875.41 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $12,940.00 S0.00 S0.00 S8,000.00 SS,000.00 S250.00 $9,250.00 $11,500.00 S14,500.00 S0.00 S200.00 $69,600.00 SS00.00 $27,000.00 S475,000.00 $44,000.00 S0.00 S34,000.00 S3,800.00 $1,650.00 S8 264,041.10 Actual 1992/93 SS,492,666.20 S0.00 $156,320.95 SS,596.TT $432,579.04 S781.99 S278.44 S279, 774.84 SS,533.16 S0.00 S0.00 SS,080.34 $3,799.13 S0.00 $9,214.98 $2,825.29 $1,516.02 S0.00 S0.00 $52,594.65 S0.00 $42,251.73 S0.00 $92,553.66 S0.00 $25,052.50 S1, 728. 72 $611.00 S6 616,759.41 Budget 1993/94 S6,984,012.8Y S0.00 $179,658.36 S0.00 $511,280.08 S1, 108.32 S0.00 $356,989.06 SS,500.00 S0.00 S0.00 SS,240.00 SS,150.00 S257.50  SS,467.50 SS,635.00 SS,635.00 S0.00 S206.00 $79,958.35 S515.00 $27,810.00 S489,250.00 $69,570.00 S0.00 S32,900.00 $3,914.00 S1 ,699.50 $8,780,756.57 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 l17.00 15.00 232.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Descrlotion 1145 HIGH SCHOOL MAGNET 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0333 TRAVEL 0350 ADVERTISING 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING AND BINDING-EXTE 0380 FOOD SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0421 TEXTBOOICS - LOCAL SClJRCES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0548 EQUIPMENT - SUPPLY CENTER 1145 HIGH SCHOOL MAGNET TOTALS . Page 12 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $24,976.12 $587.73 $1,955.62 Sl, 120.42 S0.00 $2,341.45 S0.00 $195.50 $54.00 $1,647.02 S0.00 $7,685.52 $1,662.78 S0.00 $42 226.16 Budget 1992/93 $176,625.00 S0.00 $6,470.96 S0.00 S0.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 S0.00 $0.00 $15,000.00 $7,000.00 $20,000.00 $13,000.00 $15,000.00 $273,095.96 Actual 1992/93 $16,998.53 S0.00 $1,300.40 $702.03 $14.40 $8,054.26 $127.00 $0.00 S0.00 $40,224.23 $1,917.71 $27,289.23 $126,235.61 $1, 140.06 $224,003.46 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $8,000.00 $4,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 $64,000.00 $6,000.00 $13,000.00 $3,000.00 $2,000.00 $100,000.00 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code Descri tion Code - Descri tion 1146 HIGH SCHOOL STANDARDS 3 0 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 1146 HIGH SCHOOL STANDARDS TOTALS Page 13 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 Budget 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 Actual Budget 1993/94 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1151 BOYS ATHLETICS 0410 SUPPLIES 0491 UNIFORMS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 0492 STADIUM OPERATIONS 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 1151 BOYS ATHLETICS TOTALS Page 14 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $74.11 $16,944.55 $11,520.00 $13,559.36 $42 098.02 Budget 1992/93 $900.00 $17,200.00 $11,520.00 $15,000.00 $44,620.00 Actual 1992/93 $0.00 $11,030.23 $15,863.00 $12,768.35 $39,661.58 Budget 1993/94 $927.00 $17,350.00 $11,520.00 $15,000.00 $44,797.00 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 - Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 FlXlCtion Object Code Description Code Description 1152 GIRLS ATHLETICS 0491 UNIFORMS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 0492 STADIUM OPERATIONS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1152 GIRLS ATHLETICS TOTALS Page 15 Little Rock School District Program Budget  OOH Actual 1991/92 $37,979.23 $5,580.00 S0.00 $43 559.23 Budget 1992/93 $7,650.00 $5,400.00 $180.00 $13 230.00 Actual 1992/93 $19,674.43 $5,580.00 S0.00 $25 254.43 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 $4,618.20 $180.00 S4 798.20 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Code - Description Code - Description 1154 FOOTBALL/MINOR SPORTS UJl1 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0491 UNIFORMS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 0492 STADIUM OPERATIONS 1154 FOOTBALL/MINOR SPORTS TOTALS Page 16 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 $1 ~08. lU $24,596.97 $21,533.91 $47 638.98 Budget 1992/93 $1,980.00 $25,200.00 $22,500.00 $49 680.00 Actual 1992/93 $2,507.00 $21,108.82 $25,375.00 $48 990.82 Budget 1993/94 $1,980.00 $25,200.00 $22,500.00 $49 680.00 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1155 VOLLEYBALL 0130 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS-SHORT 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0491 UNIFORMS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 0492 STADIUM OPERATIONS 0494 GAME RELATED EXPENSES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1155 VOLLEYBALL TOTALS Page 17 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 S135.00 Sl0.33 S1 ,373. 79 S2,936.04 Sl ,370.00 S665.00 S0.00 S6,490.16 Budget 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 Sl,440.00 S3,600.00 Sl,440.00 S720.00 S0.00 S7 200.00 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 Sl,358.09 S2,813.54 Sl,990.00 S0.00 S232. 10 S6,393.73 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 S0.00 Sl,483.20 S3,708.00 Sl,483.20 S741.60 S0.00 S7 416.00 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fi.net ion Object Code - Description Code - Description 1156 BASKETBALL 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0491 UNIFORMS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 0492 STADIUM OPERATIONS 0494 GAME RELATED EXPENSES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1156 BASKETBALL TOTALS Page 18 little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 $2,485.02 $0.00 $13,633.08 $26,015.02 $661.20 $0.00 $42,794.32 Budget 1992/93 SJ,240.00 $0.00 $15,300.00 $26,280.00 $720.00 $0.00 $45,540.00 Actual 1992/93 $3,0~4.39 $160.50 $12,039.40 $26,700.00 $0.00 $877.80 $42 832.09 Budget 1993/94 $j,l83.20 $0.00 $15,435.00 $26,420.40 $741.60 $0.00 $45 880.20 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 FlllCtlon Object Code Description Code - Description 1157 TRACIC,TENNIS,GOLF \u0026amp; SIIIMH 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0491 UNIFORMS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 0492 STADIUM OPERATIONS 0494 GAME RELATED EXPENSES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1157 TRACK TENNIS,GOLF \u0026amp; SIIIHH TOTALS Page 19 Little Rock School District Program Budget OOH Actual 1991/92 S1,303.29 $4,309.90 S2,851.00 $602.62 SO.OD $9,066.81 Budget 1992/93 S2,880.00 $4,680.00 S2,880.00 S720.00 SO.DO $11. 160.00 Actual 1992/93 S140.00 S2,702.39 SS,320.00 SO.DO S2,959.00 $11,121.39 Budget 1993/94 S2,YU.40 $4,766.40 S2,934.00 S741.60 SO.OD $11,354.40 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Fl.l'ICt ion Object Code Description Code Description 1158 BASEBALL 0491 UN I FORMS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 0492 STADIUM OPERATIONS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1158 BASEBALL TOTALS Page 20 Little Rock School District Program Budget OOM Actual 1991/92 $8,946.68 $0.00 $0.00 S8 946.68 Budget 1992/93 $9,000.00 $1,800.00 $0.00 $10 800.00 Actual 1992/93 $4,982.87 $2,000.00 $287.70 $7 270.57 Budget 1993/94 $9,000.00 $1,800.00 $0.00 $10 800.00 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1190 OTHER REGULAR 01H STIPENDS 0130 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS-SHORT 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROO IHPROV 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0410 SUPPLIES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 1190 OTHER REGULAR TOTALS Page 21 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $27,218.98 S504.40 $2,120.95 $18,025.44 S9,635.92 S18.85 SO.OD $3,337.15 S182.30 S2,814.00 $63 857.99 Budget 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S20,000.00 S10,000.00 $48.00 S500.00 S2,429.00 S2,324.84 S2,395.00 S37,696.84 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S15,482.78 S0.00 SO.OD S1,731.18 SO.DO S2,936.00 $20,149.96 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S1,000.00 S10,000.00 $48.00 S500.00 S2,429.00 S2,325.00 S2,395.00 S18,697.00 PROO: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1191 MULTI -ETHNIC PROGRAM OlJD SUBSTITUTE TEACH~RS-SHORT 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROG IHPROV 1191 MULTI-ETHNIC PROGRAM TOTALS Page 22 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $171.12 S13.09 5506.67 $690.88 Budget 1992/93 SD.DD SO.OD SO.OD SO.OD Actual 1992/93 SD.DO SO.OD SO.OD SD.OD Budget 1993/94 SD.OD SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO PROG: BUDOD4 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code Description Code Description 1193 TRAVELING TEACHERS 0332 TRAVEL-PAYROLL 0333 TRAVEL 1193 TRAVELING TEACHERS TOTALS Page 23 I I I Little Rock School District Program Budget OOM Actual 1991/92 SO.DOI $21,042.561 s21,042.56 I Budget 1992/93 s12,ooo.001 so.001 s12,ooo.oo I Actual 1992/93 S0.00 $16,011.32 $16,011.32 Budget 1993/94 $15,000.00 S0.00 S15,0DO.DD PROG: BUOD04 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 FlllCtion Object Code - Description Code - Description 1195 ACCELERATED LEARNING 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0290 OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0328 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT \u0026amp; VEH 0333 TRAVEL 0380 FOOD SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0413 SOFTWARE 0416 SUPPLIES  SUPPLY CENTER 0421 TEXTBOOl(S - LOCAL SOJRCES 0483 ELECTRIC 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0545 EQUIPMENT LEASE PURCHASE 1195 ACCELERATED LEARNING TOTALS Page 24 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 S447, 048. 20 S480.00 $508,728.05 $74,297.38 $69,334.95 $60.00 $1,000.00 $20,042.22 $12,765.00 S0.00 so.oo $58,667.45 S13, 297 .12 S0.00 S2, 727 .03 $4,428.43 $32,735.96 $1,037,564.00 $2 283 175 .79 Budget 1992/93 $358,860.00 S0.00 $601,845.00 $180,762.26 S0.00 S0.00 SS,000.00 SS0,000.00 $714.00 S10,000.00 $50,000.00 S10,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 $8,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 S1,000,000.00 $2,275 181.26 Actual 1992/93 S.\u0026gt;vr, 11ll.86 S0.00 $415,952.48 $62,207.94 $77,754.28 S0.00 $925.00 $14,283.78 S0.00 $1,286.73 S0.00 $21,455.98 $736.64 $3,575.87 S196.41 S0.00 $7,009.54 $1,037,564.00 $2 040 131.51 Budget 1993/94 $491,815.94 S0.00 $292,702.65 $57,434.87 $68,302.97 S0.00 $3,000.00 $18,000.00 $300.00 S4,000.00 $5,000.00 $27,000.00 $1,200.00 S0.00 S2,000.00 $0.00 S12,000.00 $350,000.00 $1,332 756.42 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 15.00 39.00 54.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1196 ACCELERATED LEARNING 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0410 SUPPLIES 0421 TEXTBOOICS - LOCAL SOORCES 0450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 1196 ACCELERATED LEARNING TOTALS Page 25 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 S52.75 S10,553.14 $6,676.57 S112.27 S17,394.73 Budget 1992/93 SO.OD SO.OD SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO Actual 1992/93 SO.DO SO.OD SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO Budget 1993/94 SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO SO.OD PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fi.,ction Object Code - Description Code - Description 1199 SUBSTITUTES-INSTRUCTION 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0130 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS-SHORT 0135 SUBST. CERTIFIED LONG TER 0140 SUBST NON-CERTIFIED-SHORT 0145 SUBST. NON-CERTIFIED LONG 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 0240 INSURANCE 1199 SUBSTITUTES-INSTRUCTION TOTALS Page 26 Little Rock School District Program Budget - ODM Actual 1991/92 S33,360.18 $869,871.30 S326, 189.12 S33,985.53 S28,557.67 S101,337.98 S0.00 SO.OD Sl,393,301.78 Budget 1992/93 SO.OD S900,000.00 SO.DO s100,ooo.oo SO.OD S96,370.00 SO.DO SO.OD Sl.096,370.00 Actual 1992/93 S30,693.49 S1,285,230.67 SO.DO S115,688.90 SO.DO S109,653.58 S18.42 S30.83 Sl 541.315.89 Budget 1993/94 SO.OD S926,321.00 SO.DO S185,264.20 SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO SO.OD Sl,111,585.20 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fl61Ction Object Code - Description Code - Description 1210 IT I NE RANT INSTRUCTION 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1210 ITINERANT INSTRUCTION TOTALS Page 27 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 5842,551.43 $64,456.02 $33,503.54 $1,797.08 S0.00 $885.23 $943 193.30 Budget 1992/93 $793,737.00 $104,043.14 S0.00 Sl,600.00 S0.00 $500.00 $901 880.14 Actual 1992/93 $739,887.39 $56,601.38 $38,273.58 $1,531.80 $13.70 $126.60 $836 434.45 Budget 1993/94 $1,018,946.50 $72,661.61 $53,716.35 S2,000.00 S0.00 $300.00 $1 147 624.46 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 47.00 47.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 FlXlCtion Object Code - Description Code - Description 1220 RESOORCE ROC'f4 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES  SUPPLY CENTER 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1220 RESOORCE ROC'f4 TOTALS Page 28 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 S1 ,848,lZY.2.5 S0.00 $141,389.11 $70,776.20 $4,025.53 S0.00 $873.54 $2,065,293.61 Budget 1992/93 Sl,9.52,,u .. 54 $5,294.20 $244,297.63 S0.00 $6,700.00 S0.00 $200.00 $2,189,284.37 Actual 1992/93 Sl,554,460.39 SO.DO $118,917.31 $78,850.74 $998.21 $344.20 $0.00 $1,753,570.85 Budget 1993/94 $2,020,960.81 S0.00 $144,115.83 $101,329.54 S2,000.00 $0.00 $200.00 $2,268,606.18 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 78.00 78.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1230 SPECIAL CLASS 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0410 SUPPLIES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1230 SPECIAL CLASS TOTALS Page 29 Little Rock School District Program Budget - ODM Actual 1991/92 s1. 111,088.:,1 $8,833.77 $85,674.58 $44,680.29 $2,762.63 S0.00 $1 253.039.78 Budget 1992/93 s1,120,622.oo $18,108.00 $152,152.62 S0.00 $2,700.00 $3,000.00 $1.296 582.62 Actual 1992/93 $969,932.60 $1,972.10 $74,351.53 $49,861.62 $455.23 S0.00 $1 096 573.08 Budget 1993/94 $1,224,YYY.00 S0.00 $87,355.36 S61, 150.71 $2,000.00 $1,500.00 $1 377 005.08 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 38.00 38.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code Description Code Description 1240 HOMEBOUND AND HOSPITAL 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCf 0410 SUPPLIES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1240 HOMEBOUND AND HOSPITAL TOTALS Page 30 little Rock School District Program Budget OOH Actual 1991/92 $187,392.42 S27, 128.44 $16,410.60 $9,873.13 $8,794.35 $5,478.19 S255 077 .13 Budget 1992/93 $194,977.00 $8,231.00 S25, 157.63 SO.DO S7,200.00 S5,000.00 $240,565.63 Actual 1992/93 $128,692.54 $22,963.99 $11,602.26 S9, 152.81 $6,973.12 $1,652.14 $181,036.86 Budget 1993/94 $250,543.00 $27,376.49 $19,973.89 $16,286.73 Sl,800.00 S3,000.00 S324 980.11 PROO: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 8.00 3.00 11.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Fl.l'lCtion Object Code - Description Code - Description 1290 OTHER 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0370 TUITION 1290 OTHER TOTALS Page 31 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 5131,rrY.18 $10,081.27 $5,414.12 $55,658.30 S0.00 $1,318.97 ' $619,478.36 $823 730.20 Budget 1992/93 $0.00 S0.00 $0.00 $90,000.00 $2,100.00 $2,000.00 $341,187.20 $435,287.20 Actual 1992/93 $100,899:58 $7,718.81 $5,108.07 $36,041.12 $315.38 S0.00 $845,484.28 $995,567.24 Budget 1993/94 $127,075.40 $9,782.62 $7,956.20 $50,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $800,000.00 $997,814.22 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 5.00 5.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 fu,ction Object Code - Description Code - Description 1292 EXTENDED YEAR HAND. SERVI 0117 STIPENDS 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROG IMPROV 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0410 SUPPLIES 1292 EXTENDED YEAR HAND. SERVI TOTALS Page 32 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 $8,351.70 $638.88 $1,926.00 $2,842.80 $392.34 $14,151.72 Budget 1992/93 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Actual 1992/93 $2,692.50 $205.97 $1,049.00 $0.00 $0.00 $3,947.47 Budget 1993/94 $3,705.28 $0.00 $2,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,705.28 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 F1.r1ction Object Code - Description Code - Description 1321 MARKETING/DIST ED-COOP 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0548 EQUIPMENT - SUPPLY CENTER 1321 MARKETING/DIST EDCOOP TOTALS Page 33 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 $178,612.16 $13,663.95 $4,702.49 $0.00 $743.64 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $197 722.24 Budget 1992/93 $172,446.00 $19,870.18 $0.00 $500.00 $2,070.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $194.886.18 Actual 1992/93 $181,931.00 $13,917.34 $6,555.75 $0.00 $64.89 $140.14 $1,124.70 $2,410.68 $129.49 $206 273.99 Budget 1993/94 $185,705.47 $13,242.74 $6,589.40 $515.00 $2,132.10 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $208 184.71 PROO: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 4.00 4.00 Date: D6/3D/93 Time: D9:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1322 MARKETING/DIST ED-EXPL DllD REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX D240 INSURANCE 1322 MARKETING/DIST ED-EXPL TOTALS Page 34 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 S2,594.76 S196.50 S75.76 S2,669.04 Budget 1992/93 SD.DO S0.00 SO.OD SO.DD Actual 1992/93 SO.OD SO.DD SD.DD SD.DD Budget 1993/94 SD.00 SD.DD SD.DO SD.DD PROG: BUDDD4 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1331 BUSINESS ED COOP 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0410 SUPPL! ES 0416 SUPPLIES SUPPLY CENTER 1331 BUSINESS ED COOP TOTALS Page 35 Little Rock School District Program Budget OOH Actual 1991/92 $172,933.32 $13,229.16 $4,786.82 SO.DO $172.18 S0.00 $191,121.48 Budget 1992/93 $169,737.00 $19,643.17 S0.00 $200.00 $900.00 S0.00 $190 480.17 Actual 1992/93 $160,265.55 $12,260.19 $5,833.53 $173.76 S814.n $179.96 $179 527.76 Budget 1993/94 $181,901.88 $12,971.54 $6,589.44 $206.00 $927.00 S0.00 $202,595.86 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 4.00 4.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1332 BUSINESS ED EXPL 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0410 SUPPLIES 0413 SOFTIIARE 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0540 EQUIPMENT -PERSONAL PROPER 0548 EQUIPMENT - SUPPLY CENTER 1332 BUSINESS ED EXPL TOTALS Page 36 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $506,226.88 $38,726.16 $17,724.45 $2,396.10 $7,730.99 $152.16 $0.00 $280,891.14 S0.00 $853 847.88 Budget 1992/93 $476,049.00 $60,214.91 S0.00 $8,000.00 $3,150.00 $0.00 S0.00 $28,400.00 S0.00 $575 813.91 Actual 1992/93 $456,428.24 $34,916.74 $21,239.05 $3,157.50 $602.13 S0.00 $3,306.91 S2, 184.91 $300.48 $522,135.96 Budget 1993/94 $548,626.86 $39,122.83 $24,367.31 $8,240.00 $3,244.50 S0.00 S0.00 $29,252.00 S0.00 $652 853.50 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 16.00 16.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1333 BUSINESS ED-SKILL TR 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0361 PRINTING AND BINDING-EXTE 0410 SUPPLIES 0413 SOFTIJARE 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0420 TEXTBOOKS 0421 TEXTBOOKS LOCAL SOURCES 0440 PERIOOICALS 0450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1333 BUSINESS ED-SKILL TR TOTALS Page 37 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 Sff.\u0026gt;,JOO.Jf S59, 157.48 $23,214.52 $23,416.90 S0.00 $12,848.99 $13,608.14 S0.00 ($10.95) $10,714.68 $101. 92 S0.00 $53,805.36 S970 157.41 Budget 1992/93 $749,126.00 $90,956.57 S0.00 $23,000.00 S0.00 $47,279.00 $13,500.00 S0.00 S0.00 $4,500.00 S0.00 $180.00 $37,000.00 $965 541.57 Actual 1992/93 S739, 709. TB $56,587.95 $30,389.36 $19,445.31 $170.36 $4,108.72 S0.00 $5,862.74 S0.00 $206.17 $79.87 S0.00 $93,230.18 $949,790.44 $1 Budget 1993/94 S834, 157.76 $59,484.22 $35,692.57 $20,963.00 S0.00 $41,180.85 $13,905.00 S0.00 S0.00 $4,635.00 S0.00 S185.40 $10,947.00 021 150.81 PROG: BI.J0004 FTE 1993/94 22.00 22.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fi.net ion Object Code - Description Code - Description 1341 HEALTH COOP 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0421 TEXTBOOtCS - LOCAL SOORCES 0440 PERIOOICALS 1341 HEALTH COOP TOTALS Page 38 little Rock School District Program Budget - COM Actual 1991/92 $51,573.76 $3,945.39 $1,215.22 S0.00 Sl,419.47 S0.00 $561.59 $39.90 $58,755.33 Budget 1992/93 $41,005.00 $4,791.02 S0.00 S200.00 S5,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 sso 996.02 Actual 1992/93 $58,359.84 $4,464.55 $2,335.28 S0.00 $207. 76 $207.09 $504.71 S0.00 $66,079.23 Budget 1993/94 $23,373.75 Sl,666.79 S1 ,578.27 S206.00 $5,150.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $31,974.81 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 1.00 1.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description u51 TRADE \u0026amp; IND-COOP 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0421 TEXTBOOKS - LOCAL SCXJRCES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1351 TRADE \u0026amp; IND-COOP TOTALS Page 39 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 S175, 108.76 S13,395.97 $4,771.13 SO.DO S274.91 SO.OD S204.14 SO.DO S193 754.91 Budget 1992/93 S166,361.DO S19,360.26 S0 . 00 S500.00 SO.OD SO.DO S0.00 S3,000.00 S189,221.26 Actual 1992/93 S160,487.17 S12,277.36 S5,835.37 SO.DO SO.OD S28.05 SO.DO S143.69 S178, 771.64 Budget 1993/94 S181,065.18 S12,911.79 $6,587.85 S515.00 SO.OD SO.OD SO.DO S3,090.00 S204. 169 .82 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 4.00 4.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 FLllCt ion Object Code - Description Code - Description 1352 TRADE \u0026amp; INDEXPL 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0410 SUPPLIES 0413 SOFTIIARE 0416 SUPPLIES  SUPPLY CENTER 0421 TEXTBOOKS LOCAL SOURCES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0543 EQUIPMENT (REAL PROPERTY) 0548 EQUIPMENT  SUPPLY CENTER 1352 TRADE \u0026amp; INDEXPL TOTALS Page 40 little Rock School District Program Budget - COM Actual 1991/92 $483,823.44 $37,012.37 $15,121.90 $953.30 $15,983.65 $105.50 $0.00 $1,356.62 $65,450.42 SO.OD $0.00 $619.807.20 Budget 1992/93 $471,809.00 $57,149.99 $0.00 $4,000.00 $4,400.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 S537 358.99 Actual 1992/93 $403,580.97 $30,874.10 $16,510.92 $667.64 $15,065.73 $0.00 $228.78 $0.00 $40,641.04 $22,240.00 $768.25 $530,577.43 Budget 1993/94 $491,621.64 $35,057.75 $22,719.57 $4,120.00 $4,532.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $558,050.96 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 14.00 14.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1353 TRADE \u0026amp; IND-SKILL TR 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0311 INSTRUCTION SERVICES 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROG IMPROV 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0333 TRAVEL 0350 ADVERTISING 0361 PRINTING AND BINDINGEXTE 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0421 TEXTBOOKS LOCAL SOJRCES 0440 PERIODICALS 0450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0542 EQUIPMENT (NOT INVENTORIE 1353 TRADE \u0026amp; IND-SKILL TR TOTALS Page 41 S1 Little Rock School District Progr11111 Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $769,051.89 $58,832.56 $21,889.44 S0.00 $69,531.00 $3,807.37 $210.59 $192.80 S0.00 $39,021.10 S0.00 S4, 979.14 $932.59 $2,583.40 $45,242.99 $681. 76 016,956.63 Budget 1992/93 lf02,046.00 S84,5n.65 S0.00 $500.00 $1,500.00 $9,000.00 $1,600.00 s290.oo $600.00 $10,500.00 SD.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $42,300.00 S0.00 $852,818.65 Actual 1992/93 $676,224.45 S51, 913. 72 S26,7n.88 S0.00 $66,078.00 $2,359.55 $2,951.06 $3,316.12 S0.00 $29,363.31 $1,696.12 $1,867.92 $649.96 $932.29 $13,167.82 S0.00 $877,293.20 Budget 1993/94 STT4,390.61 $55,222.18 $31,158.83 $515.00 $1,545.00 $3,000.00 S2,000.00 $206.00 $618.00 $25,000.00 SO.OD S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $40,000.00 S0.00 $933 655.63 PROG: BUIJ004 FTE 1993/94 19.88 19.88 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1354 Ya.JTH APPRENTICESHIP 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON -CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0350 ADVERTISING 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0540 EQUIPMENT -PERSONAL PROPER 1354 YOUTH APPRENTICESHIP TOTALS Page 42 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 sa,oou.oo $4,725.00 $400.00 Sl,000.23 S0.00 S0.00 $5,630.44 $137.47 $9,957.90 $11,544.19 so.oo S369.25 S41 764.48 Budget 1992/93 $jl ,990.00 S0.00 S0.00 $4,035.56 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $10,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 $46.025.56 Actual 1992/93 $45.00 S0.00 $1,200.00 $95.24 S0.00 $517.20 $3,548.41 S0.00 S0.00 $3,842.69 $854.36 S0.00 $10 102.90 Budget 1993/94 $98,970.88 S0.00 S0.00 S7,057.64 $3,294.71 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $10,300.00 S0.00 S0.00 $119 .623. 23 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 2.00 2.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Descriotion 1360 HOME ECONOMICS 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 1360 HOHE ECONOMICS TOTALS Page 43 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $35,073.54 $2,683.04 $1,190.05 $38 946.63 Budget 1992/93 $32,597.00 $4,086.42 S0.00 $36.683.42 Actual 1992/93 S2, 726.22 $208.56 $100.92 S3 035.70 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $0.00 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1362 CONS/HMKG 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES SUPPLY CENTER 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1362 CONS/HMKG TOTALS Page 44 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 S:\u0026gt;t.\u0026gt;,.508.3.5 S43 857.91 $19,039.50 S6,642.13 S17,128.14 $0.00 S11,013.71 S670, 989 .72 Budget 1992/93 S::,o::,,0.5.5.00 S72,057.37 S0.00 S2,000.00 S4,040.00 S0.00 Sl,000.00 S664, 130.37 Actual 1992/93 5484, 624. 72 S37,033.81 S21,420.21 S3,506.19 SS,984.26 S699.19 S9,967.14 $566,235.52 Budget 1993/94 S651,380.92 S46,450.37 S29,367.20 S2,060.00 S4, 161.20 S0.00 S1,030.00 S734,449.69 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 19.00 19.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1371 CAREER ORIENTATION 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES SUPPLY CENTER 0421 TEXTBOOKS LOCAL SOURCES 0450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 1371 CAREER ORIENTATION TOTALS Page 45 little Rock School District Program Budget OOM Actual 1991/92 S204,950.42 S15,678.85 S7,038.79 S407. 71 S2,141.00 SO.DO S508.12 SO.OD S230 724.89 Budget 1992/93 S197,908.00 S24,713.50 SO.DO S1,000.00 S1,030.00 SO.DO SO.OD SO.DO S224 651.50 Actual 1992/93 S202,411.27 S15,484.34 SS,695.17 S664.89 S1,184.17 S506.16 S3,289.37 S1,424.10 S233,659.47 Budget 1993/94 S222,328.21 S15,854.33 S9,825.46 S1,030.00 S1,D60.90 SO.OD SO.OD SO.DO S250.098.90 PROO: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 6.00 6.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1392 COORD CAREER-COOP 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0421 TEXTBOOKS - LOCAL SOURCES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1392 COORD CAREER-COOP TOTALS Page 46 Little Rock School District Program Budget - ODM Actual 1991/92 S180,436.35 S13,803.24 S4, 782.23 SO.OD S559.02 S0.00 S154.78 S2,059.41 $201,795.03 Budget 1992/93 S177,795.00 S20,318.43 SO.DO S500.00 Sl ,890.00 S0.00 $0.00 $2,700.00 $203,203.43 Actual 1992/93 S167,486.23 S12,812.40 S5,877.92 S174.07 S134.87 $112.32 $560.73 $1,301.56 $188 460.10 Budget 1993/94 S190,232.30 SlJ,565.60 $6,589.44 S515.00 Sl, 946.70 S0.00 S0.00 S2,781.00 S215,630.04 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 4.00 4.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code Description Code Description 1393 LOORD CAREEREXPL 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 1393 LOORD CAREEREXPL TOTALS Page 47 Little Rock School District Program Budget  COM Actual 1991/92 S0.00 $0.00 S0.00 $0.00 Budget 1992/93 $19,229.50 $2,288.84 S0.00 $21.518.34 Actual 1992/93 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Budget 1993/94 $0.00 S0.00 $0.00 $0.00 PROO: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fl.net ion Object Code - Description Code - Description 1410 ADULT BASIC EDUCATION 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0327 RENTAL OF LAND \u0026amp; BUILDING 0333 TRAVEL 0341 TELEPHONE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0410 SUPPLIES 0411 SUPPLIES - SP TRACKING 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0421 TEXTBOOKS - LOCAL SOURCES 0490 OTHER SUPPLIES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1410 ADULT BASIC EDUCATION TOTALS Page 48 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 S276,425.88 S103,570.81 S29,069.87 S16,081.90 SO.DO S3,927.45 SO.OD S63.98 S149.55 S2,963.99 S356.65 S0.00 S3,395 .71 S0.00 Sl,408.95 $437 414.74 Budget 1992/93 S260,947.65 S111,820.00 S29,483.83 SO.OD S1,000.00 SO.DO SO.OD SO.DO SO.DO Sl,000.00 SO.OD S0.00 S0.00 SO.OD SO.OD $404 251.48 Actual 1992/93 S224,622.66 S97,547.06 S24,646. 15 S18,289. 15 S2,412.79 SO.OD S261.36 SO.OD SO.DO S258.76 SO.OD S71.88 S2,830.76 SO.DO SO.OD S370 940.57 Budget 1993/94 S274,981.58 S103,581.21 S27,590.37 S14,518.97 Sl ,849. 71 SO.OD S1,036.13 S500.00 SO.DO Sl,260.00 SO.DO SO.OD $2,000.00 SO.DO SO.OD S427 317.98 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 9.00 6.00 15.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fll1Ction Object Code - Description Code  Description 1420 ADULT GENERAL EDUCATION 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0327 RENTAL OF LANO \u0026amp; BUILDING 0333 TRAVEL 0341 TELEPHONE 0342 POSTAGE 0350 ADVERT! SI NG 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0490 OTHER SUPPLIES 1420 ADULT GENERAL EDUCATION TOTALS Page 49 Little Rock School District Program Budget OOM Actual 1991/92 $157,824.94 $9,610.67 $12,809.05 $6,227.55 S0.00 $211.82 S0.00 S0.00 $20.10 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $186 704.13 Budget 1992/93 $166,056.99 S0.00 $12,703.36 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $1,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 so.co S1,000.00 $180.760.35 Actual 1992/93 $206,356.51 s9,8n.5o $16,541.44 $9,245.76 $326.00 S0.00 $317.28 S0.00 S0.00 $417.00 S1 ,330.84 $594.36 $1,731.32 $775.15 $247,508.16 Budget 1993/94 S273, 798.22 $18,836.45 $19,744.36 $8,071.47 S0.00 $1,400.00 S0.00 $2,000.00 $300.00 S0.00 $3,624.89 S0.00 S0.00 $300.00 $328 075.39 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 9.00 1.00 10.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code Description Code Descrlotlon 1430 ADULT VOCATIONAL PROGRAM 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX \" 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRSEOUIPHENT 0332 TRAVELPAYROLL 0341 TELEPHONE 0342 POSTAGE 0410 SUPPLIES 0540 EQUIPHENTPERSONAL PROPER 1430 ADULT VOCA Tl ONAL PROGRAM TOTALI Page 50 Little Rock School District Program Budget OOH Actual 1991/92 $11,341.00 S867.62 S473. 70 $0.00 $285 .10 $0.00 $0.00 Sl,259.41 S4,722.67 $18 949.50 Budget 1992/93 $34,576.00 $2,645.06 $0.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 S1,000.00 $0.00 $39 221.06 Actual 1992/93 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 S0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Budget 1993/94 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,030.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 S1,250.00 S0.00 $2 280.00 PROO: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 fu,ction Object Code - Description Code - Description 1440 SPECIAL PROJECTS 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRSEQUIPHENT 0327 RENTAL OF LAND \u0026amp; BUILDING 0332 TRAVEL-PAYROLL 0333 TRAVEL 0341 TELEPHONE 0342 POSTAGE 0350 ADVERTISING 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0410 SUPPLIES 0411 SUPPLIES - SP TRACKING 0421 TEXTBOOKS - LOCAL SOURCES 0490 OTHER SUPPLIES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1440 SPECIAL PROJECTS TOTALS Page 51 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $8,520.00 S2,700.00 $858.35 S0.00 S263.75 S2,249.29 $0.00 S997.05 S2, 781.60 S750.00 S0.00 S36.50 S235.74 S1 ,353.18 S2,870.04 S1,000.00 S4,359.25 S28 974.75 Budget 1992/93 S0.00 SO.DO $8,576.57 SO.DO S925.28 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 so.oo S0.00 $500.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S10,001.85 Actual 1992/93 $0.00 SO.DO SO.OD $0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 SO.OD S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 Budget 1993/94 SO.OD S0.00 $0.00 SO.DO $953.04 S0.00 so.oo S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 SO.DO S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S953.04 PROO: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 FIilet ion Object Code - Description Code - Description 1445 WORKPLACE LITERACY 0451 AUDIO-VISUAL MATERIALS I 0540 EQUIPMENTPERSONAL PROPER! 1445 WORKPLACE LITERACY TOTALS I Page 52 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 S1 ,471.55 I $24,074.201 S25,545.75 I Budget 1992/93 so.001 so.001 S0.00 I Actual 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Descri tion Code - Descri tion 1490 OTHER ADULT EDUCATION 0 10 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0421 TEXTBOOKS - LOCAL SOURCES 1490 OTHER ADULT EDUCATION TOTALS Page 53 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual Budget 1991/92 1992/93 S32,008.80 SO.OD S2,448.72 SO.OD S1, 173.54 SO.OD SO.DO SO.DO $35,631.06 SO.DO PROG: BUD004 Actual Budget FTE 1992/93 1993/94 1993/94 S10,530.00 SO.DO S805.62 SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO S732.02 SO.DO S12,067.64 SO.DO Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1550 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0140 SUBST NON-CERTIFIED-SHORT 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0350 ADVERTISING 0380 FOOD SERVICES 0410 SUPPL! ES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0540 EQUIPMENT -PERSONAL PROPER 1550 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION TOTALS Page 54 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 SJ48,239.02 $449,900.27 S6,847 .68 $61,571.66 S59,049.99 S4,m.6o Sl ,074.23 SO.OD (S351.89) (S131.87) S0.00 (S23.76) S930,948.93 Budget 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 SO.OD SO.OD S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 SO.DO SO.DO SO.OD SO.OD SO.DO S0.00 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 S187, 739.10 Sl,076.76 S14,444.24 S17,853.38 $4,740.88 S357.22 S39.60 S0.00 S21,059.31 S459.12 SO.DO S247 769.61 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 S206,593.30 so.oo S15,903.91 S22,471.41 S0.00 S500.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 SO.OD so.oo S245 468.62 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 21.00 21.00 Date: 06/3D/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Descr i pt I on Code - Oescr i Pt ion 156D READING 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED D210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0332 TRAVEL-PAYROLL 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING ANO BINOING-EXTE 0380 FOOO SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0440 PERIODICALS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 156D READING TOTALS 55 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 SO.OD SO.OD SO.DO SD.00 S217.87 SO.DO S991. 70 S203.13 $31.00 S11.81 $89.25 S7, 167.83 S0.00 S292.39 S2,211.43 S11 216.41 Budget 1992/93 S202,028.00 S2,900.00 S22,774.00 S14,016.49 S0.00 $3,200.00 S0.00 SO.DO S0.00 SO.OD SO.OD $35,150.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S280 068.49 Actual 1992/93 SO.OD SO.DO S0.00 SO.OD S94.95 SO.DO Sl,764.60 S130.09 S95.98 SO.DO SD.OD $12,805.73 S818.35 S189.89 Sl,048.63 $16.948.22 Budget 1993/94 SO.OD SO.OD SO.DO S0.00 S200.00 Sl,800.00 S0.00 S200.00 S200.00 SO.DO SO.DO S20,000.00 S0.00 SO.OD S0.00 S22 400.00 PROG: BUDDD4 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 FIM'let I on Object Code  Description Code  Description 1570 MATHEMATICS 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0332 TRAVEL-PAYROLL 0333 TRAVEL 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING ANO BINDINGEXTE 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES SUPPLY CENTER 0440 PERIOOICALS 0540 EOUIPMENTPERSONAL PROPER 1570 MATHEMATICS TOTALS Page 56 Little Rock School District Program Budget  OOM Actual 1991/92 S261,943.72 S313.34 S18.84 S40.30 S29.50 S7,576.39 S15,949.06 S0.00 S262.40 S2,526.87 S288 660.42 Budget 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 Sl0,000.20 S0.00 S11,519.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S21 519.20 ---- Actual 1992/93 S0.00 S313.66 S0.00 S129.84 S0.00 S0.00 S3,648.98 Sl,691.51 S125.00 S0.00 S5 908.99 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 SS,000.00 S0.00 S7,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S12,000.00 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fl.rlction Object Code - Description Code - Description 1580 ACADEMIC PROGRESS GRANTS 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0124 CLERICAL OVERTIME 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0311 INSTRUCTION SERVICES 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROG IMPROV 0313 PUPIL SERVICES 0316 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0380 FOOD SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0413 SOFTIIARE 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0421 TEXTBOOKS - LOCAL SOURCES 0440 PERIODICALS 0450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0545 EQUIPMENT LEASE PURCHASE 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 1580 ACADEMIC PROGRESS GRANTS TOTALS Page 57 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 S118,uYY.U6 $84.27 S0.00 S9, 138.70 S32.90 S1,625.00 $675.00 S1 ,213.35 S235.00 S7,529.35 S700.00 $35,550.94 S2.90 S1 ,062.17 S8,790.48 $168,725.30 S30,414.31 S0.00 (S88.60) S740.25 (S15.38) S272,444.23 S0.00 S1,616.00 $658,575.23 Budget 1992/93 SO.OD S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $320,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 SO.DO S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $320 000.00 Actual 1992/93 $49,417.48 S0.00 SJ, 199.49 $4,417.62 S7.28 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S126.00 S0.00 S0.00 S12,252.60 S174.00 S0.00 S1,878.7J $45,296.64 S2,004.43 S1,868.81 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S35,332.38 S26,009.22 S0.00 S181 984.68 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $320,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 SO.DO S0.00 S0.00 SO.DO SO.DO S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 SO.DO S0.00 S0.00 $320 000.DO PROG: Bl.ll004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Ft.n:tion Object Code - Description Code - Description 1595 COMPENSATORY EDUCATION 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROG IMPROV 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1595 COMPENSATORY EDUCATION TOTALS Page 58 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $73:i,oo.:.44 $32,581.74 S0.00 $58,784.61 $28,657.95 $628.00 $104,697.68 $0.00 $5,791.41 $967 023.83 Budget 1992/93 SDY,DY( .80 $0.00 $0.00 $99,039.72 $0.00 $0.00 $1,500.00 $2,000.00 $0.00 $862 437.52 - Actual 1992/93 $572,307.32 $27,014.25 $0.00 $45,821.60 $30,114.69 $0.00 $38,978.66 $304.13 $0.00 $714 540.65 $1 -- Budget 1993/94 $896,504.40 $0.00 $85,369.74 $70,502.15 $46,927.72 $0.00 $1,500.00 $2,000.00 $0.00 102 804.02 -- PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 29.00 8.00 37.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0332 TRAVEL-PAYROLL 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING AND BINDING-EXTE 0370 TUITION 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0421 TEXTBOOKS - LOCAL SOURCES 0440 PERIODICALS 0450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0490 OTHER SUPPLIES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED TOTALS Page 59 little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 Sl,143,rYY.80 SO.DO S15, 133.92 $88,658.96 S41, 124.25 SO.OD SO.DO SO.OD SO.DO S120.56 S448.60 $657.39 $618.02 Sl,359.00 S30,421.27 SO.OD SO.OD Sl ,650.91 SO.DO $68.90 S101.90 S2,848.11 S1 ,327, 011. 59 Budget 1992/93 S525,587.00 S10,000.00 SO.DO $67,346.75 SO.DO $4,000.00 $400.00 $810.00 S360.00 SO.DO S1 ,500.00 Sl,000.00 Sl,500.00 SO.DO S27,243.00 SO.OD $450.00 Sl,835.00 $450.00 SO.DO SO.DO S4,000.00 $646,481.75 Actual 1992/93 S581,377.52 SO.OD S14,353.22 $45,573.25 S26,569.31 SO.OD SO.OD S734.20 SO.OD SO.DO S134.84 $698.44 S445.26 S687.25 S15,796.23 $782.10 SO.DO S189.66 SO.DO SO.OD S261.25 Sl,348.42 $688,950.95 Budget 1993/94 S946,743.94 S5,000.00 S15,288.71 $69,503.26 S50,665.84 S2,000.00 S200.00 $810.00 S360.00 SO.DO S1,000.00 Sl,000.00 S1,000.00 SO.DO S27,243.00 SO.OD $450.00 $800.00 $450.00 SO.DO SO.DO S3,000.00 S1,125,514.75 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 41.00 1.00 42.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fu,ction Object Code - Description Code - Description 2111 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION 0310 PROFESSIONAL , TECHNICAL 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINOINGINTERN 0361 PRINTING ANO BINOING-EXTE 0410 SUPPLIES 0430 LIBRARY BOOKS 0540 EQUIPHENTPERSONAL PROPER 2111 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION TOTALS Page 60 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 St!.\u0026gt;( .37 SO.OD S0.00 (S49.00) S417.36 S146.37 S236.52 S10,332.90 S11.321.52 Budget 1992/93 Sl,200.00 S1,200.00 S500.00 S200.00 S300.00 S1 ,250.00 S500.00 S0.00 S5,150.00 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 SO.OD (S16.00) SO.DO S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 (S16.00) Budget 1993/94 s1,200.oo S1,200.00 S500.00 S200.00 S300.00 S1,250.00 S500.00 S0.00 S5, 150.00 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2113 SOCIAL IIORIC SERVICES 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 2113 SOCIAL IIORIC SERVICES TOTALS Page 61 little Rock School District Program Budget  OOH Actual 1991/92 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 SO.OD Budget 1992/93 sa.oo S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 SO.OD Budget 1993/94 $108,422.16 S8,346.63 S5,593.01 S122,361.80 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 10.00 10.00 Date: D6/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2114 PUPIL ACCOONTING SERVICES 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING AND BINDING-EXTE 0410 SUPPLIES 0415 TEST MATERIALS 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 2114 PUPIL ACCOONTING SERVICES TOTALS Page 62 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $57,828.92 $28,961.58 $6,832.98 $2,716.67 $32,289.20 $200.45 $838.36 $86.19 $189.48 $818.81 $11,689.90 S0.00 $2,517.24 $509.45 $145,479.23 Budget 1992/93 $0.00 S0.00 $0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $2,700.00 $12,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $14 700.00 Actual 1992/93 $54,060.29 $19,311.24 $5,612.87 $2,805.79 $7,695.00 $0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $87.67 $8,620.50 $307.49 S0.00 SO.OD $98,500.85 Budget 1993/94 $60,987.00 $38,663.25 $7,129.63 $4,745.62 $0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 so.oo $500.00 Sll,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 SO.DO $123,025.50 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94  1.00 2.00 3.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 fU'lCtion Object Code - Description Code - Description 2120 GUIDANCE SERVICES 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0333 TRAVEL 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES SUPPLY CENTER 2120 GUIDANCE SERVICES TOTALS Page 63 Little Rock School District Program Budget OOM Actual 1991/92 Sl,408,559.51 S107, 755 .13 S44,349.26 S0.00 $1,168.42 S0.00 Sl.561.832.32 Budget 1992/93 sz,~uu,4/4.90 $269,562.52 S0.00 S0.00 $5,000.00 S0.00 S2 475 037.42 Actual 1992/93 S1 ,997,465.05 $152,805.99 $87,369.22 $565.36 $241.11 S82.67 S2,Z38 529.40 Budget 1993/94 S2,557,98/ .81 $182,580.24 $117,691.65 S0.00 $5,150.00 S0.00 S2 863 409.70 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 79.00 79.00 Date: D6/30/93 Little Rock School District PROG: BUD004 Time: 09:13 Program Budget - OOM Function Object Actual Budget Actual Budget FTE Code Descri tion Code - Descri tion 1991/92 1992/93 1992/93 1993/94 1993/94 12 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION 0 0 PROFESSIONAL TECHNICAL $496.00 350.00 $400.00 $350.00 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROG IMPROV Sl,715.97 S2,000.00 S0.00 Sl,000.00 0332 TRAVEL-PAYROLL $20.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 0333 TRAVEL $717.29 S0.00 $603.87 S0.00 0342 POSTAGE $584.30 $2,200.00 $569.65 Sl,200.00 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN S0.00 S1,000.00 S0.00 S500.00 0361 PRINTING ANO BINOING-EXTE $672.01 Sl,000.00 S0.00 S500.00 0410 SUPPLIES $4,433.83 $6,300.00 $79.00 $7,300.00 2121 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION TOTALS $8,639.40 $12,850.00 Sl,652.52 $10,850.00 Page 64  - Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fi.nction Object Code - Description Code - Description 2122 COUNSELING SERVICES 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 2122 COUNSELING SERVICES TOTALS Page 65 little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 $1, 1Jl,Y1.61 S86,591.n $42,848.52 $1,261 361.90 Budget 1992/93 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 S0.00 Actual 1992/93 $45,522.52 $3,482.50 $2,164.69 $51,169.71 Budget 1993/94 $34,748.00 S2,4n.90 $1,640.51 $38,866.41 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 1.00 1.00 Datt!: 06/30/93 Timi!: 09:13 Function Objl!ct Codi! Dl!scri tion Codi! Dl!scri tion OTHER GUIDANCE SERVICES 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 2129 OTHER GUIDANCE SERVICES TOTALS Page 66  - - Littll! Rock School District Program Budgl!t  OOH Actual 1991/92 Budgl!t 1992/93 S0.00 $0.00 S0.00 $0.00 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 Budgl!t 1993/94 $0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 FL11Ction Object Code - Description Code - Description 2134 NURSING SERVICES 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0328 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT \u0026amp; VEH 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0410 SUPPLIES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 0642 LIABILITY INSURANCE 0649 OTHER INSURANCE 2134 NURSING SERVICES TOTALS Page 67 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 SO.DO S0.00 $682,852.45 S52,238.92 S29,310.94 S8, 177.54 S942.54 Sl,393.82 S974.37 S81.31 S727 .85 S12,299.57 S208.47 S240.00 S1 ,817 .08 SO.DO S791 264.86 Budget 1992/93 S9,1'7.50 S757.00 S682, 737 .50 S99,083.86 SO.DO S9,200.00 S200.00 $350.00 SO.DO S90.00 S821.00 S7,982.40 SO.DO SJ00.00 SO.OD S2, 175.00 $812,854.26 Actual 1992/93 SD.00 SO.DO S586,321.70 S44,853.42 $33,849.43 SO.DO S977.45 S4, 125.15 S518.04 S83.16 S587.75 S10,329.43 SO.DO SO.DO SO.OD Sl,748.00 $683,393.53 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 SO.OD $687,569.42 S52,930.65 S44,538. 74 S9,200.00 S200.00 $350.00 SO.DO S90.00 S821.00 S10,000.00 SO.OD SJ00.00 SO.DO S2, 175.00 S808, 174.81 PROO: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 42.20 42.20 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2142 PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING SER 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 2142 PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING SER TOTALS Pege 68 Little Rock School District Program Budget - DOM Actual 1991/92 $157,717.08 $12,065.45 $6,732.97 $176 515.50 Budget 1992/93 SO.DO $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Actual 1992/93 $135,710.30 $10,381.84 $7,012.04 $153 104.18 Budget 1993/94 $176,258.94 $12,569.14 $8,789.73 $197 617.81 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 5.00 5.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code Description 2211 SERVICE AREA OIRECTION 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROO IMPROV 0318 BOARD OF ED SERVICES 0319 OTHER PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0328 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT \u0026amp; VEH 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING AND BINDING-EXTE 0365 COPIER LEASE 0370 TUITION 0380 FOOO SERVICES 0390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES SUPPLY CENTER 0435 0440 PERIOOICALS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0548 EQUIPMENT SUPPLY CENTER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 0635 DUES \u0026amp; FEES NCA 2211 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION TOTALS Page 69 Little Rock School District Program Budget OOH Actual 1991/92 $299, ,o,. 75 S0.00 $127,704.37 $31,744.44 $12,337.02 $118,243.62 S0.00 $2,455.37 S305.96 S79.20 $2,721.00 $592.16 $1,849.29 $491.05 $2,575.82 $98,632.75 S567.56 S0.00 $2,681.11 S0.00 S0.00 $160.83 $3,343.94 S0.00 $126.92 S12,950.00 $719 148.16 Budget 1992/93 $268,653.00 $107,404.00 $33,574.00 S35,430.69 S0.00 $22,600.00 $46,362.00 S0.00 S2,800.00 S0.00 S4,000.00 $1,000.00 $5,998.00 S3,000.00 S0.00 S135,000.00 $200.00 S0.00 $15,761.72 $17,447.00 U,000.00 S0.00 S2,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 S26,000.00 S730 230.41 Actual 1992/93 $248,238.41 S47,425.29 $138,694.16 $32,276.71 $13,577.27 S0.00 S89,500.00 S0.00 S411.46 S0.00 U,644.04 $597.86 $2,473.36 $1, 155.60 S0.00 $136,019.00 $1,151.52 S1, 139.67 $6,677.16 $1,492.66 S0.00 S367.56 S1, 704.68 $129.49 S373.66 S15,023.01 S742,072.57 Budget 1993/94 S322, 120.00 S0.00 $97,848.21 $28,677.37 $14,585.42 S25,000.00 $150,000.00 S0.00 SJ, 125.00 S0.00 U,000.00 $750.00 $4,500.00 $2,500.00 S0.00 $145,000.00 S1,000.00 S0.00 $12,412.00 S5,000.00 S2,000.00 S0.00 S1,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 $17,000.00 $835.518.00 PROO: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 5.00 5.00 10.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Flnctlon Object Code - Description Code - Description 2212 INSTRUCTION AND CURR DEV 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROG IMPROV 0314 STAFF SERVICES 0319 OTHER PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0328 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT \u0026amp; VEH 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0332 TRAVEL-PAYROLL 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING AND BINDING-EXTE 0380 FOOO SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0411 SUPPLIES - SP TRACKING 0412 LOCAL SUPPLIES SP TRACKIN 0413 SOFTIIARE 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0421 TEXTBOOKS - LOCAL S\u0026lt;JJRCES 0431 LIBRARY REFERENCE MATERIA 0440 PERIOOICALI 0450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0451 AUDIO-VISUAL MATERIALS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0548 EQUIPMENT - SUPPLY CENTER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 2212 INSTRUCTION AND CURR DEV TOTALS Page 70 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 $1,243,098.68 $74,532.36 $406,737.78 S134,050.61 $59,576.17 Sl,275.40 S0.00 S40.00 S0.00 S6,568.39 S19.80 $13,573.70 $1,731.70 $3,711.58 S2, 722.18 $9,356.20 $2,681.39 $116.28 $115,716.47 S4,691.25 S6,926.08 Sl,250.00 S0.00 Sl,620.41 $15,527.70 $5,253.82 $833.59 $5,317.36 $25,221.15 $0.00 S539.50 S2 142,689.55 Budget 1992/93 S1 ,047,711.00 $66,903.55 $774,976.00 $297,012.44 S0.00 S22,000.00 S0.00 S2,000.00 S0.00 S6,766.00 S0.00 $2,436.00 $3,600.00 $3,200.00 S3,525.00 S41,700.00 $3,000.00 $0.00 S53,m.oo S4,500.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 S0.00 Sll,000.00 S0.00 $41,330.00 S2,000.00 $50,000.00 $55,500.00 SO.OD $3,000.00 $2 505,932.99 Actual 1992/93 S1 ,078,510.86 $41,213.44 $329,597.38 $110,868.12 $62,206.66 S4, 997 .25 S25,900.00 S61.60 $5,400.00 S4,021.52 $0.00 $13,776.25 S692.20 S6, 730.44 $2,907.03 $10,316.57 $3, 152.63 $328.49 $59,828.87 $0.00 S0.00 $7,045.19 SS,628.12 Sl ,227.72 S0.00 $19,843.11 S417.00 $22,019.01 $5,765.01 S423.55 $736.55 Sl,826,614.57 Budget 1993/94 S1 ,387, 995.10 so.oo $289,901.10 $121,148.28 $71,539.31 S14, 150.00 S0.00 Sl,000.00 S0.00 SS,866.00 S0.00 $17,436.00 $2,500.00 $3,000.00 S4,327.00 $25,335.00 Sl,000.00 S0.00 S60,036.00 $1,000.00 S0.00 Sl0,000.00 S0.00 S6,000.00 S0.00 $22,881.35 S500.00 $30,000.00 $13,500.00 S0.00 $1,200.00 $2,093,315.15 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 29.00 16.60 45.60 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2213 INSTRUCTIONAL STAFF TRAIN 0117 STIPENDS 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0410 SUPPLIES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 2213 INSTRUCTIONAL STAFF TRAIN TOTALS Page 71 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 S2,079.66 S159.16 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S2,238.82 Budget 1992/93 S14,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S14,000.00 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 Budget 1993/94 SI0,000.00 S713.11 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S10 713.11 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 F111Ction Object Code Description Code - Description u15 INST STAFF TRAINING - TES 0117 STIPENDS 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 2215 INST STAFF TRAINING - TES TOTALS Page 72 I I I Little Rock School District Program Budget - ODM Actual 1991/92 so.001 SO.DOI S0.00 I Budget 1992/93 $25,000.001 SO.DOI S25,ooo.oo I Actual 1992/93 SO.OD SO.DO $0.00 Budget 1993/94 S15,000.00 Sl,070.13 S16,070.13 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 FlllCtlon Object Code - Description Code - Description 2216 INST STAFF TRAINING - PET 0117 STIPENDS 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 2216 INST STAFF TRAINING - PET TOTALS Page 73 I I I Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 S4,747 .05 I $363.14) $5 110.19 I Budget 1992/93 S40,000.001 $0.001 S40 000.00 I Actual 1992/93 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Budget 1993/94 $30,000.00 $2, 139.33 $32,139.33 PROG: BU\u0026gt;004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2217 CLASSROOI MANAGEMENT 011, STIPENDS 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0312 INSTRUCTIONAL PROG 2217 CLASSROOI MANAGEMENT TOTALS Page 74 IMPROV Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 s12,,oo.J8 S961.88 S500.00 S14.030.26 Budget 1992/93 Sl.5,000.00 SO.OD SO.OD S13 000.00 Actual 1992/93 SO.DO S0.00 S756.00 S756.00 Budget 1993/94 S10,000.00 S713.11 SO.OD S10 713.11 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Fl.net ion Object Code Description Code Description 2218 PARTNERS IN EDUCATION 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 2218 PARTNERS IN EDUCATION TOTALS Page 75 Little Rock School District Program Budget  ODM Actual 1991/92 S17,041.69 Sl,303.78 Sl ,028.30 s19 373.n Budget 1992/93 SO.Ou S0.00 so.co so.co Actual 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: D6/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2219 OTHER IMPROVEMENT OF INST 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0124 CLERICAL OVERTIME 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0350 ADVERTISING 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING AND BINDING-EXTE 0410 SUPPLIES 0411 SUPPLIES - SP TRACKING 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0440 PER I OD I CALS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 2219 OTHER IMPROVEMENT OF INST TOTALS Page 76 Little Rock School District Program Budget - ODM Actual 1991/92 S10,64.S.62 S0.00 $117,059.37 S0.00 $9,769.44 S6,338. 16 S84.55 S4,828.25 $2,411.41 S29.56 S709.82 $1,540.02 $1,383.92 $2,459.88 S0.00 S91.50 S2,658.09 S305.00 $160.312.59 Budget 1992/93 S0.00 S835.00 $144,523.00 S0.00 $21,664.60 S0.00 S0.00 S2,500.00 S1,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S11,500.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S182 022.60 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 $120,666.02 $16,038.99 $10,457.73 $9,213.68 S0.00 $2,429.29 $3,632.83 S0.00 S1,688.09 S0.00 S644.80 $2,490.84 S985.53 S119.76 S36.87 S325.00 S168 729.43 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 S0.00 $93,428.97 S0.00 S7,192.38 S6,291.63 S0.00 S3,000.00 S5,000.00 S0.00 S1,500.00 S0.00 $2,700.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S119 112.97 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 6.00 6.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 FlXlCtion Object Code - Description Code - Description 2222 SCHOOL LIBRARY SERVICES 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDIMG-INTERN 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0430 LI BR ARY BOOKS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 2222 SCHOOL LIBRARY SERVICES TOTALS Page 77 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $1,554,555.82 $630,210.45 S167, 134.80 S97,028.66 S0.00 S151,623.52 SO.DO S13.61 S3,020.04 $2 603 586.90 Budget 1992/93 $1,553,735.00 S567,938.00 S297,696.06 SO.DO SO.DO S21,750.00 S18,250.00 SO.DO S0.00 S2 459 369.06 Actual 1992/93 Sl ,409, 194.91 S520,410.11 S147,615.59 S112,285.96 S36.00 S146,163.24 S6, 146.58 SO.DO S0.00 S2 341 852.39 Budget 1993/94 Sl ,676,485 .19 $440,867.59 S119,653.84 S150,295.84 SO.DO S22,402.50 S18,797.50 SO.DO S0.00 $2,428,502.46 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 46.00 44.00 90.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - DescrlptiOl'I 2a.\u0026gt; AUDIOVISUAL SERVICES 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 2223 AUDIOVISUAL SERVICES TOTALS Page 78 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 S32,269.66 S2,468. 73 S2,067.36 S36.805. 75 Budget 1992/93 SO.DO SO.DO SO.OD S0.00 Actual 1992/93 S24, 140.00 Sl,846.80 S2,382.68 S28 369.48 Budget 1993/94 S27,370.93 S2,107.07 S3,031.56 S32 509.56 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 2.00 2.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code Descri tion Code Descri tion 229 OTHER EDUCATIONAL MEDIAS 031 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL OTHER EDUCATIONAL MEDIAS TOTALS Page 79 little Rock School District Program Budget OOH Actual 1991/92 S 6,000. 0 S76 000.00 Budget 1992/93 $86,000.00 S86 000.00 Actual 1992/93 S76,000.00 S76,000.00 Budget 1993/94 $86,000.00 S86 000.00 PROG: Blll004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 F111etion Object Code - Description Code - Description 2310 BOARD OF EDUCATION SERVIC 0117 STIPENDS 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 2310 BOARD OF EDUCATION SERVIC TOTALS Page 80 Little Rock School District Program Budget - ODIi Actual 1991/92 $6,694.53 S512.17 S129.10 S7 335.80 Budget 1992/93 SO.DO SO.OD SO.OD S0.00 Actual 1992/93 SO.OD SO.DO SO.OD S0.00 Budget 1993/94 SO.DO SO.OD S0.00 S0.00 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Little Rock School District PROG: BUD004 Time: 09:13 Program Budget  OOH FU'lCt ion Object Actual Budget Actual Budget FTE Code - Descri tion Code Descri tion 1991/92 1992/93 1993/94 1993/94 2314 ELECTION SERVICES 03 BOARD OF ED SERVICES $0. $16, 0 .00 S 0,000.00 2314 ELECTION SERVICES TOTALS S0.00 $16 500.00 $20 000.00 Page 81 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fl.net ion Object Code - Descrl tlon Code - Descrl tlon LEGAL SERVICES BOARD OF ED SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES TOTALS Page 82 little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 Budget 1992/93 Actual 1992/93 Budget 1993/94 $350,000.00 S350,000.00 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code Descri tion Code Descri tion 31 AUDIT SERVICES 0 BOARD OF ED SERVICES AUDIT SERVICES TOTALS Page 83 little Rock School District Program Budget OOH Actual 1991/92 Budget 1992/93 Actual 1992/93 $36,692.50 $36 692.50 Budget 1993/94 $35,000.00 $35 ODO.DO PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 F1n:tion Object Code - Description Code - Description 2$19 OTHER BOARD OF EDUCATION 0240 INSURANCE 0250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0290 OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0318 BOARD OF ED SERVICES 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0350 ADVERTISING 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING AND BINDING-EXTE 0365 COPIER LEASE 0380 FOOO SERVICES 0390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0440 PERIOOICALS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 2319 OTHER BOARD OF EDUCATION TOTALS Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 ($26,989.28) $153,797.29 $60,014.78 $50,465.41 $0.00 $4,735.02 $126.90 $367.80 $3,180.50 $368.75 $1,312.66 $2,585.01 $7,089.61 $3,364.38 $0.00 $492.39 $24,079.73 $3,030.00 $288 020.95 Budget 1992/93 S0.00 S160,000.00 $73,462.00 S5,000.00 $1,500.00 $10,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $0.00 $3,000.00 S6,000.00 $500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $11,000.00 $281 462.00 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 $192,426.52 $57,835.84 $193.07 $0.00 $7,697.99 $104.16 $512.20 $2,732.32 $149.70 $0.00 $2,572.55 $9,411.87 $296.27 $156.06 $30.65 $287.38 $4,710.00 $279 116.58 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 $195,000.00 S60,000.00 S5,000.00 $1,500.00 $10,000.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $4,000.00 $2,000.00 $0.00 $3,500.00 $12,000.00 $600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10,000.00 $305 100.00 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: D9: 13 Fu,ctlon Object Code - Description Code - Description 2321 OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTEND 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0120 REGULAR NOH-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0333 TRAVEL 0334 OFF I CE EXPENSES 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0365 COPIER LEASE 0380 FOOO SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0411 SUPPLIES - SP TRACKING 0412 LOCAL SUPPLIES SP TRACKIN 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0440 PERIOOICALS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 0649 OTHER INSURANCE 2321 OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTEND TOTALS Page 85 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 S198,4\\ll .86 S59,355.68 S17,D27.73 $4,475.91 S240.54 S123.11 S1 ,784.00 ($80.DD) S578.39 S36D.61 S349.5D S283.78 S518.51 S11,484.84 S1, 183.10 SO.OD S107.25 S304.89 $454.00 S2,364.85 S299,408.55 Budget 1992/93 S11D,ODD.OD S59,819.DD S18,295.23 SO.DO S5DD.DD S175.DD S3,55D.OD SO.DD Sl,000.0D S700.0D SO.DO $400.00 Sl,184.00 $6,693.00 Sl,800.00 SO.DO S126.00 SO.DO S500.00 S2,600.00 S207.342.23 Actual 1992/93 Sll0,833.33 S56, 136.85 S12,0D8.43 $4,287.02 $629.90 SD.DO S5D7 .52 SD.DD Sl,279.31 $675.80 SO.DD S196.7D S137 .27 Sl0,048.54 S391. 16 $332.56 S39.00 SO.OD Sl ,488.00 S2,291.68 S201 283.07 Budget 1993/94 SllD,000.DO S58,244.28 S5, 196.89 $4,711.14 S7DD.OD S175.0D S3,55D.DD SD.OD S2,DDD.OD S1,0DO.OO SD.OD $400.00 $800.00 S10,500.00 $800.00 SO.OD S200.00 SO.OD S500.00 S2,600.00 S201 3TT.31 PROG: BUDDD4 FTE 1993/94 1.00 2:00 3.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code  Description Code - Description 2326 DESEGREGATION 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0319 OTHER PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH 0326 REPAIRSEQUIPHENT 0332 TRAVEL-PAYROLL 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0350 ADVERT! SI NG 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING AND BINDINGEXTE 0365 COPIER LEASE 0380 FOOO SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES SUPPLY CENTER 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 2326 DESEGREGATION TOTALS Page 86 little Rock School District Program Budget  OOM Actual 1991/92 s11r,u:.1. H S0.00 $236,071.22 $23,536.94 $10,356.16 S0.00 S0.00 $195.88 $500.00 $6,350.00 $15,939.12 $5,537.18 $1,392.07 S5,876.39 $8.60 $1,265.41 S5, 771.43 S0.00 SJ,730.98 $326.00 S433 908.55 Budget 1992/93 $115,018.80 $6,000.00 $221,932.00 $43,642.08 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $200.00 S0.00 S0.00 $20,040.00 S0.00 $6,000.00 S5,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 $7,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S424 832.88 Actual 1992/93 $106,731.57 SO.DO $203,664.21 $23,745.23 $14,663.86 $4,800.00 SJ, 111.70 $132.93 S0.00 SJ,709.55 $25,275.94 S0.00 S2, 143.42 $442.69 S0.00 $1,004.58 $1,837.77 SJ,569.53 $1,356.74  S75.00 $396 264. 72 Budget 1993/94 $131,400.00 S0.00 $221,054.46 $17,231.69 $16,028.94 S0.00 S0.00 $206.00 S0.00 $4,000.00 S25,000.00 S0.00 $4,000.00 S2,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 S7,000.00 S0.00 SO.OD so.oo $427 921.09 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 2.00 8.00 10.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2410 OFF ICE OF THE PRINCIPAL 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0124 CLERICAL OVERTIME 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 0240 INSURANCE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDINGINTERN 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0548 EQUIPMENT - SUPPLY CENTER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 2410 OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL TOTALS Page 87 Little Rock School District Program Budget - ODM Actual 1991/92 $3,981,j~i.68 $1,356,553.33 $25,234.23 $407,126.16 $0.00 $0.00 $185,459.11 $151.00 $8,871.54 $0.00 $578.29 SO.DO $60 . 00 $5 965,386.34 Budget 1992/93 $j, IY, ,l611.UO $1,252,085.25 $0.00 $661,0TT.98 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $13,700.00 $14,800.00 $13,500.00 $300.00 $0.00 $5,746,732.23 Actual 1992/93 $3,614,894.08 $1,293,900.00 $38,432.92 $377,677.62 $1,152.34 SS.43 $234,608.52 $0.00 $2,426.60 $6,899.73 $3,660.65 s5n.47 $0.00 $5,574,230.36 Budget 1993/94 $4,j08,Hl6.l2 $1,337,675.08 $0.00 $407,179.03 SO.DO S0.00 S2TT,688.11 $0.00 $14,111.00 $15,244.00 $13,905.00 $309.00 $0.00 $6,374,937.44 PROG: BLA'.l004 FTE 1993/94 H6.00 88.00 174.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 FlrlCtion Object Code  Description Code  Description 2490 OTHER SUPPORT SERVICES 0361 PRINTING AND 0410 SUPPLIES 2490 OTHER SUPPORT SERVICES TOTALS Page 88 BINOINGEXTEI I I Little Rock School District Program Budget  OOM Actual 1991/92 $3,901.001 $17,053.461 S20.954.46 I Budget 1992/93 s10,ooo.001 S18,000.00I S28 000.00 I Actual 1992/93 SO.DO S925.63 S925.63 Budget 1993/94 SS,000.00 S6,000.00 S11 000.00 PROO: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 FlllC:tion Object Code Description Code Description 2~10 DIRECTION OF BUSINESS SUP 0411 SUPPLIES  SP TRACKING 0416 SUPPLIES  SUPPLY CENTER 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0548 EQUIPMENT SUPPLY CENTER 2510 DIRECTION OF BUSINESS SUP TOTALS Page 89 Little Rock School District Program Budget OOM Actual 1991/92 S19,.\u0026gt;Yl.60 .$0.00 S48,881.62 $0.00 $68 273.22 Budget 1992/93 $30,000.00 $5,000.00 $6,830.00 $39,800.00 $81,630.00 Actual 1992/93 $8,462.48 $796.70 $28, TT4. 18 $23,403.07 $61,436.43 Budget 1993/94 $15,000.00 $2,000.00 S40,000.00 S30,000.00 $87 000.00 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fl.nCtion Object Code - Description Code - Description 2521 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 2521 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION TOTALS Page 90 little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $56,Jl0.08 $4,116.90 $1,153.56 $61.590.54 Budget 1992/93 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Actual 1992/93 $51,626.67 $3,949.44 $1,503.64 $57.079.75 Budget 1993/94 $~2,170.39 $4,016.21 $1,647.36 $57.833.96 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 1.00 1.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fi.net ion Object Code - Description Code - Description 2525 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING SERV 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING ANO BINDINGEXTE 0365 COPIER LEASE 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES SUPPLY CENTER 0430 LIBRARY BOOKS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 2525 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING SERV TOTALS Page 91 Little Rock School District Program Budget - ODM Actual 1991/92 SO.DO S250, 765.41 S19,183.80 Sl0,571.12 S50.12 S26,399.35 S197.01 $6,203.50 S24.66 S9,070.13 $0.00 S278.04 SO.DO SO.DO S322, 743.14 Budget 1992/93 S2,854.00 S335,510.00 $45,967.31 SO.DO S150.00 Sll,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,690.00 SO.OD S200.00 SO.OD SO.OD S400, 971. 31 Actual 1992/93 SO.OD S253,117.43 S19,363.88 S14,148.06 S109.34 Sl0,722.52 $127.72 $0.00 $0.00 $3,687.66 $1,480.50 SO.OD S261.64 S149.28 S303, 168.03 Budget 1993/94 SO.DO S262,036.33 S19,985.22 S17,283.12 S150.00 S12,500.00 $0.00 SO.OD $0.00 $6,000.00 SO.DO S250.00 SO.DO SO.OD S318,204.67 PROO: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 11.00 11.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 FLnCtion Object Code - Description Code - Description l)l.Y OTHER FISCAL ACCCXJNTING S OllO REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 2529 OTHER FISCAL ACCCXJNTING S TOTALS Page 92 Little Rock School District Program Budget - DOM Actual 1991/92 S35,l.)0.00 $2,696.64 Sl, 131.62 S39 078.26 Budget 1992/93 su.oo S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 Actual 1992/93 SJ,02r.OO S231.58 S101.92 $3,360.50 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2539 OTHER FACILITIES ACQ \u0026amp; CO 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREHE 0240 INSURANCE 0321 UTILITY SERVICES-NATURAL 0322 UTILITY SERVICES-ELECTRIC 0323 UTILITY SER-~ATER/SE~AGE/ 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0329 OTHER PROPERTY SERVICES 0341 TELEPHONE 0390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0411 SUPPLIES . SP TRACKING 0416 SUPPLIES . SUPPLY CENTER 0481 PLUMBING 0482 CARPENTRY 0483 ELECTRIC 0485 AIR COHO/HEAT 0486 BOILERS/SH ENGINES 0488 PAINTING 0489 ROOFING 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0543 EQUIPMENT (REAL PROPERTY) 2539 OTHER FACILITIES ACQ \u0026amp; CO TOTALS Page 93 Little Rock School District Program Budget OOH Actual 1991/92 $85,656.40 S6,552.46 SJ,037.40 SS,639.01 S25,354.92 S105,683.29 SJ,558.65 S891.10 S9,357.56 S5,276.19 SS,900.46 S8,817 .33 S2,467.59 SO.OD S2,676.92 S231.99 Sl,644.12 S4,572.63 S406.11 $631.82 Sl,350.78 Sl ,851. 74 S549.13 S282, 107.60 Budget 1992/93 so.oo S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S28,000.00 S110,000.00 S5,500.00 S0.00 S0.00 SO.OD SO.OD S28,400.00 SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO S0.00 SO.DO SO.DO S171,900.00 Actual 1992/93 $80,699.44 S6, 173.53 S2,688.18 S5,909.00 S27,674.88 S87,412.16 SJ, 165.12 Sl,032.05 Sl,598.64 (S52,561.78) S9,253.18 $6,223.86 SO.OD S3,833.42 SO.DO S376.63 S436.13 S2.31 S53.17 S282.25 SO.DO S624.48 SO.DO S184 876.65 Budget 1993/94 $63,009.81 $4,850.63 S2,339.54 S7,546.89 SJ0,000.00 s110,ooo.oo SJ,600.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 SO.OD S29,252.00 SO.OD SO.OD SO.DO SO.OD SO.DO S0.00 SO.DO SO.DO SO.OD SO.DO SO.OD S250,598.87 PROG: 800004 FTE 1993/94 5.00 5.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2541 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREHE 0240 INSURANCE 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 2541 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION TOTALS Page 94 little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 S117,.H!l.00 $8,979.36 S971.76 $4,383.10 $43.90 Sl,434.00 S7,810.33 S0.00 S141,000.45 Budget 1992/93 SO.DO SO.DO SO.OD S0.00 SO.DO SO.OD S0.00 SO.DO SO.OD Actual 1992/93 S21!1, /04. 74 S16, 730. 71 S930.17 S10,706.59 S19.24 $446.27 S2,487.27 Sl,519.42 S251,544.41 Budget 1993/94 S192,079.14 S14,744.23 SO.OD S11,072.38 S100.00 $800.00 S3,000.00 S4,000.00 S225, 795. 75 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 9.00 9.00 - - - Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2542 UPKEEP OF BUILDINGS 011/ STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0121 MAINTENANCE 0124 CLERICAL OVERTIME 0140 SUBST NON-CERTIFIED-SHORT 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 0240 INSURANCE 0290 OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0321 UTILITY SERVICES-NATURAL 0322 UTILITY SERVICES-ELECTRIC 0323 UTILITY SER-WATER/SEWAGE/ 0324 CLEANING SERVICES 0325 REPAIRS-BUILDINGS 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0327 RENTAL OF LAND \u0026amp; BUILDING 0328 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT \u0026amp; VEH 0329 OTHER PROPERTY SERVICES 0333 TRAVEL 0341 TELEPHONE 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0411 SUPPLIES - SP TRACKING 0412 LOCAL SUPPLIES SP TRACKIN 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0481 PLUMBING 0482 CARPENTRY 0483 ELECTRIC 0485 AIR COND/HEAT 0488 PAINTING 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0541 EQUIPMENT PER PROP SP TRA 0543 EQUIPMENT (REAL PROPERTY) 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 2542 UPKEEP Of BUILDINGS TOTALS Page 95 little Rock School District Program Budget - COM Actual 1991/92 SU.00 S2,586, 199.27 Sl,129,828.37 $66,578.68 S454,885.96 S324, 175.08 S98,616.63 S206,202.70 S2.40 S0.00 S537,985.10 S2,546,006.78 S169,508.33 SO.OD S519,413.12 S14,349.22 S24,375.00 S7,996.01 S101,006.53 $806.13 SO.OD SO.DO SO.OD S30,330.98 S18,609.36 S220,821.34 S9,482.69 S0.00 $649.14 Sl ,417.25 S2,246.93 S2,399.47 S3,006.01 S20,019.47 S33,731.51 S90,978.65 S5,080.87 S9 226,708.98 Budget 1992/93 516,252.00 $4,306,210.87 S0.00 S0.00 S250,000.00 S721,865.56 SO.DO SO.OD S0.00 S2,000.00 SO.DO S3,421,500.00 SO.DO S15,000.00 S501,558.00 S122,800.00 S25,000.00 S10,000.00 S265,500.00 S2,500.00 Sl0,000.00 Sl,200.00 S300.00 S26,000.00 S37,400.00 Sl0,000.00 S5,000.00 S80,000.00 SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO S3,500.00 SO.DO S92,000.00 S0.00 S9,927 586.43 Actual 1992/93 SO.oO S2, 198,634.15 S1 ,029, 129. 73 S3,846.87 S216,737.56 S264, 170.69 $82,950.55 S240,049.81 SO.OD SO.OD S535,898.83 Sl,881,618.58 S122,916.32 S126,721.30 S239,830.12 S0.00 S48,468.00 S6,361.46 S2,662.14 $89.04 SO.OD SO.OD S0.00 S108,935.31 S5,217.15 S23,267.88 S7, 137.50 S40,523.33 SO.DO S0.00 SO.DO S0.00 S0.00 S9,533.42 S4, 154.TT $33,506.47 $4,184.00 S7,236 544.98 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 S2,423,333.70 Sl,136,945.28 S0.00 S231,580.25 S291,905.52 SB9,m.o6 $334,391.33 SO.OD S53,500.00 S796,700.00 S2,769,165.00 S206,350.00 S400,000.00 s200,ooo.oo S27,545.00 S112,300.00 Sl0,000.00 Sl 13,650.00 $800.00 S30,000.00 Sl,236.00 $309.00 $40,680.00 $8,000.00 S20,000.00 S9,000.00 $6,800.00 S0.00 SO.DO SO.DO SO.DO S0.00 S23,090.00 Sl0,000.00 $60,000.00 S7,500.00 S9,414 554.14 PROO: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 189.26 50.00 239.26 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fu,ction Object Code - Description Code - Description 2:\u0026gt;43 UPKEEP OF GROONOS 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0410 SUPPLIES 0411 SUPPLIES - SP TRACKING 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 2543 UPKEEP OF GROONOS TOTALS Page 96 'y little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $126.61 $31,387.91 $303.52 $1,265.88 $33 083.92 Budget 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 $9,856.79 $39.03 S0.00 $9,895.82 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 $16,500.00 S1 ,500.00 S0.00 S18,000.00 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2544 UPKEEP OF EQUIPMENT 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0486 BOILERS/SH ENGINES 2544 UPKEEP OF EQUIPMENT TOTALS Page 97 I I I little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $3,920.071 $17,176.901 $21,096.97 I Budget 1992/93 so.001 so.001 SO.DO I Actual 1992/93 $643.12 $7,622.78 S8 265.90 Budget 1993/94 $2,500.00 $15,000.00 $17 SOD.OD PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2545 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0.S26 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0410 SUPPLIES 2545 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE TOTALS Page 98 I I I Little Rock School District Progrem Budget  OOM Actuel 1991/92 S1r,266.6.SI S54,m.991 S72,039.62 I Budget 1992/93 so.001 so.001 S0.00 I Actual 1992/93 S10, 103.08 $36,613.87 $46,716.95 Budget 1993/94 $16,000.00 S60,000.00 $76,000.00 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2546 SECURITY SERVICES 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 0240 INSURANCE 0319 OTHER PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 2546 SECURITY SERVICES TOTALS Page 99 Little Roc:k School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $3,457.00 $2,532.50 $2,620.75 $658.71 S0.00 $107.69 $31,463.53 $316.03 $470.95 $41 627.16 Budget 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 $2,525.00 S0.00 $193.23 $4.50 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $2 722. 73 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2548 ASBESTOS PROGRAM 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0319 OTHER PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH 2548 ASBESTOS PROGRAM TOTALS Page 100 little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 $69,304.08 SS,301.60 S2, 142.93 S320.00 S77 068.61 Budget 1992/93 SO.OD SO.OD SO.OD SO.OD SO.OD Actual 1992/93 S65,037.50 $4,975.32 S2, 753.48 SO.DO S72 766.30 Budget 1993/94 S61,500.00 $4,655.00 S3,402.00 SO.DO S69 557.00 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 2.00 2.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 fu,ction Object Code - Description Code - Description 25411 OTHER OPER \u0026amp; HAINT 0640 INSURANCE 0641 PROPERTY INSURANCE 2549 OTHER OPER \u0026amp; MAINT TOTALS Page 101 I I I Little Rock School District Program Budget OOH Actual 1991/92 ($52.00) I $50,000.00( S49 948.00 I Budget 1992/93 S0.001 so.ool S0.00 I Actual 1992/93 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Budget 1993/94 so.uo $0.00 $0.00 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 F1..netion Object Code - Description Code - Description 2551 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0328 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT \u0026amp; YEH 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING ANO BINDING-EXTE 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0440 PERIODICALS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 2551 SERVICE AREA DIRECTION TOTALS Page 102 Little Rock School District Program Budget - ODM Actual 1991/92 s:,r,2a.64 $4,363.62 S1,049.46 S0.00 S0.00 Sl, 196.48 S2,082.40 S3,382.14 S2,369.26 S0.00 S244.00 S13,869.08 S85 779.28 Budget 1992/93 so.oo S0.00 S0.00 S500.00 S2,400.00 $600.00 sa,000.00 S1,000.00 S5,400.00 S0.00 S260.00 S0.00 S18.160.00 Actual 1992/93 so.oo S0.00 so.oo S190.72 SO.OD $445.01 S2,532.00 S22.40 S1,040.35 S1,772.40 S137.00 S411.29 S6 551.17 Budget 1993/94 $6,086.15 $468.52 S1 ,470.89 S500.00 S2,400.00 S700.00 S4,000.00 S500.00 $4,000.00 S0.00 S200.00 S1,000.00 S21.325.55 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 1 .00 1.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2552 VEHICLE OPERATION 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREHE 0240 INSURANCE 0290 OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2552 VEHICLE OPERATION TOTALS Page 103 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $2,663,328.58 $203,236.18 $51,886.18 $242,810.23 $2.40 $3,161,263.57 Budget 1992/93 $2,111),000.00 $625,688.20 S0.00 S0.00 SO.DO S3 500 688.20 Actual 1992/93 $2,399,315.89 $183,545.86 $42,757.05 $295,713.95 S0.00 $2,921,332.75 Budget 1993/94 $2,815,761.73 $216,762.13 $37,042.07 $465,187.74 S0.00 $3,534,753.67 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 324.10 324.10 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Function Object Code  Description Code  Description l))j MONITORING OllO REGULAR NON -CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREHE 0240 INSURANCE 0550 VEHICLES 2553 MONITORING TOTALS Page 104 Little Rock School District Program Budget OOM Actual 1991/92 5264,1147.0\\1 $20,268.45 S5, 160.17 S11, 742.43 $19,600.00 $321,718.14 Budget 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 Actual 1992/93 S260,61Z.54 $19,936.97 $6,070.57 $15,633.09 S0.00 $302,253.17 Budget 1993/94 $275,571.52 $21,214.59 $7,079.40 $18,923.89 S0.00 S322 795.40 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 12.00 12.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code Description Code Description 2554 VEHICLE SERVICING 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAK 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 0240 INSURANCE 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0329 OTHER PROPERTY SERVICES 0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0333 TRAVEL 0339 OTHER TRANSPORTATION SERV 0409 SUPPLIES 0410 SUPPLIES 0411 SUPPLIES SP TRACKING 0490 OTHER SUPPLIES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0550 VEHICLES 0551 VEHICLES LEASE PURCHASE 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 2554 VEHICLE SERVICING TOTALS Page 105 little Rock School District Program Budget OOH Actual 1991/92 $0.00 $273,452.95 $20,918.95 $9,359.28 $10,747.15 $278,469.60 $16,000.00 $549,220.97 $1,908.51 $1,430.88 $0.00 $181,396.99 $794,427.65 $9,399.57 $9,903.94 $132,506.60 $906,669.49 $3,435.30 $3 199 247.83 Budget 1992/93 $10,370.00 $585,214.00 $79,871.09 $0.00 $0.00 $259,000.00 $10,000.00 $400,000.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $235,000.00 $737,146.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $910,000.00 $0.00 $3 227.601.09 Actual 1992/93 $0.00 $279,933.31 $21,414.73 $8,049.15 $13,330.04 $335,329.96 $12,703.25 $431,152.60 $1,419.43 $835.70 ($22,450.39) $104,226.16 $698,885.70 $15,271.99 $2,155.95 $0.00 $618,895.35 $9,681.80 $2 530.834.73 $1 Budget 1993/94 $0.00 $280, 791 . 98 $21,616.09 $8,997.36 $14,482.97 $259,000.00 $15,000.00 $478,000.00 $2,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $150,000.00 $722,000.00 $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 962 888.40 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 10.00 10.00 Dete: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 F1.11Ction Object Code - Description Code - Description /.)//. PURCHASING SERVICES Ull/ STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 0240 INSURANCE 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0327 RENTAL OF LAND \u0026amp; BUILDING 0328 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT \u0026amp; VEH 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0350 ADVERTISING 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING AND BINOING-EXTE 0365 COPIER LEASE 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0430 LIBRARY BOOKS 0440 PERIOOICALS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0545 EQUIPMENT LEASE PURCHASE 0548 EQUIPMENT - SUPPLY CENTER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 2572 PURCHASING SERVICES TOTALS Page 106 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 so.oo S374,m.6o $28,563.92 $1,645.68 S14, 963. 13 S0.00 S194.92 $12,857.25 S117.90 $321.45 $2,776.63 S22.50 S0.00 S0.00 $387,415.95 S4, 100. 10 S0.00 S257.95 S0.00 $5,611.69 $93,964.39 S0.00 S0.00 $927,587.06 Budget 1992/93 S5,oro.50 $427,972.00 $58,033.30 S0.00 SO.OU S0.00 $700.00 S10,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 S4,000.00 S750.00 U,000.00 S11,000.00 S470,000.00 $3,600.00 S0.00 $360.00 S0.00 S15,000.00 S0.00 $51,902.00 S0.00 $1,062,193.80 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 $366,392.79 $28,028.98 $1,560.50 $19,649.40 S0.00 S0.00 $13,258.12 S0.00 $140.77 S2, 185.38 S38.95 S52.00 $25.00 $278,783.36 $2,020.87 $1,234.70 S0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $72,802.76 S0.00 $320.00 $786,493.58 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 $371,681.67 $28,491.19 $1,785.50 $22,279.63 S30,000.00 $600.00 S14,000.00 S0.00 S15,000.00 S5,000.00 $800.00 $2,400.00 S7,500.00 $503,000.00 U,000.00 S0.00 $370.80 $360.00 S12,000.00 S0.00 S0.00 Sl,200.00 S1 ,019,468. 79 PROO: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 15.00 15.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Ft.net ion Object Code - Description Code - Description 2573 1/AREHOJSING \u0026amp; OISTRIBUTIN 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0325 REPAIRS-BUILDINGS 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0410 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 2573 1/AREHOJSING \u0026amp; DISTRIBUTIN TOTALS Page 107 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 s21,rn.r!! Sl,667.38 S714.72 S0.00 S102.40 S4, 173.64 SO.DO S208.23 S28,662.15 Budget 1992/93 50.oO SO.OD SO.DO S0.00 S500.00 S11,000.00 SO.DO S0.00 $11,500.00 Actual 1992/93 S34,992.10 S2,676.78 Sl,385.13 SO.DO S200.00 $3,359.81 S28.28 SO.OD $42,642.10 Budget 1993/94 S36,893.51 S2,840.16 S1 ,631.93 S300.00 S500.00 S14,705.00 $0.00 S2,985.00 $59,855.60 PROG: BU\u0026gt;004 FTE 1993/94 1.00 1.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 FlllCtion Object Code Oescrl tlon Code - Oescri tlon 4 PRINTING PUB OUPLICAT 6 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING ANO BINOING-EXTE 0410 SUPPLIES 2574 PRINTING PUB \u0026amp; OUPLICAT TOTALS Page 108 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 Budget 1992/93 S65,000.00 $5,000.00 $115,000.00 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 $25,095.29 $74,994.07 S0.00 $100 089.36 Budget 1993/94 ,000.00 $50,000.00 S65,000.00 $3,500.00 $126,500.00 PROG: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Flfietion Object Code Description Code Description 2585 SAFETY-DRUG TESTING 0117 STIPENDS 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0410 SUPPLIES 0411 SUPPLIES SP TRACKING 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 2585 SAFETY-DRUG TESTING TOTALS Page 109 little Rock School District Program Budget OOH Actual 1991/92 Sl,589.00 S121.56 $380.00 S0.00 S103.S4 S12,394.14 S0.00 $14.588.24 Budget 1992/93 S0.00 S0.00 S500.00 S500.00 S10,000.00 S0.00 S5,000.00 S16,000.00 Actual 1992/93 S0.00 SO.DO S565.00 S71.00 S131.35 S9,242.08 S0.00 S10.009.43 Budget 1993/94 S0.00 SO.OD $600.00 S200.00 S200.00 S12,000.00 S2,000.00 S15 000.00 PROG: BIA\u0026gt;004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code Description 2587 SAFETY \u0026amp; SE CUR I TY 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME 0240 INSURANCE 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0319 OTHER PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0328 RENTAL OF EQUIPMENT \u0026amp; VEH 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0411 SUPPLIES SP TRACKING 0412 LOCAL SUPPLIES SP TRACKIN 0414 SUPPLIES 0416 SUPPLIES SUPPLY CENTER 0491 UNIFORMS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0545 EQUIPMENT LEASE PURCHASE 0548 EQUIPMENT SUPPLY CENTER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 2587 SAFETY \u0026amp; SECURITY TOTALS Page 110 Little Rock School District Program Budget - OOM Actual 1991/92 S103,364.50 $0.00 $435,792.63 $41,209.77 $616.91 S33,998.66 $4,319.00 $46,923.44 S136.62 $842.56 S392.98 $129.76 S155.04 S13,500.00 S5,546.95 Sl,099.38 S1 ,497 .30 sa, 101.60 $0.00 SO.DO S30,880.64 S31,650.41 SO.DO S214.00 S760 378. 15 Budget 1992/93 SO.DO $5,464.00 S483,649.00 S91, 115.30 SO.DO SO.DO S2,000.00 S70,000.00 S2,000.00 S5,000.00 SO.DO SO.OD SO.DO SO.OD $40,000.00 SO.OD SO.OD SO.DO SO.OD S5,000.00 SO.DO S50,000.00 $0.00 SO.DO S754 228.30 Actual 1992/93 $11,967.73 $0.00 $498,078.83 $39,018.72 S701.52 $42,326.98 $5,765.00 S42,515.06 Sl,202.63 Sl,523.84 $454.32 $41.97 S169.59 $4, 180.00 S19,356.74 SO.DO S2,396.88 Sl,098.52 S246.53 S3,407.33 S758.15 $31,650.41 S258.98 S208.00 S707 327.73 Budget 1993/94 $0.00 $0.00 $640,216.08 S49,088.66 $642.92 $59,024.40 $5,000.00 S72,100.00 S2,000.00 S2,000.00 S700.00 $75.00 $250.00 S5,200.00 S21,800.00 SO.OD S3,000.00 S2,000.00 SO.DO S5,000.00 S2,000.00 SO.OD SO.DO S500.00 $870 597.06 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 40.00 40.00 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09: 13 Function Object Code - Description Code - Description 2589 RISK MANAGEMENT 0117 STIPENDS 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0333 TRAVEL 0342 POSTAGE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0361 PRINTING AND BINDING-EXTE 0410 SUPPLIES 0440 PERIOOICALS 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 0640 INSURANCE 0649 OTHER INSURANCE 2589 RISK MANAGEMENT TOTALS Page 111 Little Rock School Olstrict Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 $0.00 $0.00 S0.00 $76,632.13 $198.00 S0.00 $35.35 $37.35 $10.39 $924.29 $181.13 $1,029.68 $335.00 $1,196,288.20 $49,440.00 $1 325 111.52 Budget 1992/93 $688.00 $60,307.00 $7,820.98 S0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 S0.00 $0.00 S0.00 $0.00 $0.00 S0.00 $1,018,440.00 $50,000.00 $1,137,255.98 Actual 1992/93 $0.00 S0.00 S0.00 $93,724.69 $0.00 S447.63 $3.82 $0.00 $0.00 $164.99 $0.00 $0.00 S0.00 $620,983.15 $47,960.00 $763 284. 28 Budget 1993/94 $0.00 S0.00 $0.00 S0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 S0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 S400,000.00 $50,000.00 S450,000.00 PROO: BU0004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fla'let ion Object tlon Code - Descri tion PPORT SERVICES-BU 6 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER OTHER SUPPORT SERVICES-BU TOTALS Page 112 little Rock School District Program Budget - OOH Actual 1991/92 0. 0 S0.00 Budget 1992/93 Actual 1992/93 Budget 1993/94 S 71,500.00 $171 500.00 PROG: BUD004 FTE 1993/94 Date: 06/30/93 Time: 09:13 Fi.nction Object Code Description Code - Description 2610 DIR OF CENTRAL SUPPORT SE 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE 0310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECHNICAL 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0327 RENTAL OF LAND \u0026amp; BUILDING 0333 TRAVEL 0342 . POST~GE 0360 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING-INTERN 0365 COPIER LEASE 0380 FOOO SERVICES 0410 SUPPLIES 0413 SOFTWARE 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 0440 PER I 00 I CALS 0540 EQUIPMENTPERSONAL PROPER 0620 INTEREST 0630 DUES \u0026amp; FEES 0660 IMPROVEMENT TAX 0690 OTHER EXPENSES 2610 DIR OF CENTRAL SUPPORT SE TOTALS Page 113 Little Rock School District Program Budget OOH Actual 1991/92 SlU'.\u0026gt;,899.JO S8, 101.24 S2,986.92 SO.DO S573.92 S7,000.00 Sl,692.05 S46.91 S38.95 S209.24 SO.DO S545.24 S0.00 SO.OD S0.00 S132.09 S355,103.68 S6,691.00 S8, 971.34 SO.DO S497, 991.88 Budget 1992/93 so.oo S0.00 SO.DO S1,200.00 SO.OD S7,000.00 S10,000.00 SO.OD SO.DO SO.DO SO.OD S10,000.00 S1,000.00 SO.OD S450.00 S0.00 SO.OD S0.00 S0.00 S190,713.00 S220 363.00 Actual 1992/93 S98,917.50 S7,567.30 S3,489.63 S483.00 SO.DO SS,000.00 SO.DO S66.14 S821.45 SO.OD S95.92 S722.64 S0.00 S469.02\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eLittle Rock School District\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1182","title":"Little Rock School District Court Submission","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1993-06-28"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational statistics","School improvement programs","School employees"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District Court Submission"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1182"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 COURT SUBMISSION JUNE 28, 1993 Little Rock School District June 28, 1993 Mr. Chris Heller Friday, Eldredge and Clark 2000 First Commercial Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Chris: JUN 2 8 1993 Ollice of Des gregation Monitoring As a prerequisite to the July 7 and 8 court hearings to review budget matters, I submit the following exhibits as required by Judge Wright's order dated June 15, 1993: 1-A Budget Changes Supported by \"Business Cases\" 1-B Major Deficit Reduction Actions 1-C 1993-94 Certified Teacher Salary Increases Matrix 1-D Budget Revision (Draft 4) 1-E Action Plan Based upon my interpretation of the order, the attached exhibits should complete our required filings for the June 28, 1993 court submission date.\n~ly, Mark D. Milhollen Controller MDM/cfh Attachments 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501)374-3361 Exhibit 1-A BUDGET CHANGES SUPPORTED BY \"BUSINESS CASES\" A list of the business cases which relate to the 1993-94 Board approved budget changes are as follows: Four full time social workers at Incentive Schools One Spanish teacher for Incentive Schools A police resource officer at each secondary school Extended contracts for King staff, ABACUS expansion One secretary for desegregation facilitator One half-time communications assistant Director of Human Resources One additional assistant principal at Central High Discontinue KLRE/KUAR funding after 2 year notice One secretary in Human Resources Communications Assistant Curriculum and Learning Improvement Department One secretary in School Operations Plant Services Department Transportation Department One position in VIPS Department Total Additions Total Reductions * Savings will not accrue for two years, so they are not included in the total. $132,000 33,000 203,000 339,137 21,500 10,000 55,000 40,000 $ 833,637 $ 86,000* 21,800 40,040 897,098 23,000 178,031 62,962 20,937 $ 1,243,868 J / / \\/ t/ \\/' t/  V / v  v Exhibit 1-A Page Two Gifted and Talented Counseling Music Teachers IRC Aides Community Schools Parent Recruiting Seventh Period at Henderson $ 242,000 260,000 551,000 38,500 100,000 75,000 303,000 Total Reinstatements $ 1,569,500 A~TIO/J S ti/Toi,) ldfftd-ff T~ 15 /Jo SvS,-l.le.55 ~\"\"\" -- ~~--.. A~f-~V2 ~' ~ - ~J~. I,\u0026lt;'e- ~ - ~~P, ~o/ ~~ - b~~~. ~./ ~ -~/:, .. ~ ~ - ~~-- ~ - t:Jy~_,, \u0026amp;P~ - ~~ t.e~,.. JJ\u0026amp;~~ k~~d:i - ~ ~-- kd~~ ~ t::-~ - :l\n,a---~-- Q',4 ~ - ~ ~,., \u0026amp;~~~ ~7 /.A:~ _ ~ ad-- ~ 4 ~/~-~ 4,..t!- /:\u0026amp;?Y ~-~ ~7~--~ PROGRAM ANALYSIS for STAFFING THE INCENTIVE SCHOOLS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Desegregation Plan identifies twenty different positions to be considered for staffing at each Incentive School. Over the past several years the District has made a good faith effort to hire most of the recommended positions. The remaining unfilled positions are being considered at this time to further meet the needs of students and the school community. These positions are: assistant principals, social workers, a Spanish teacher(s), and alternative classroom specialists. A. Background These positions identified in the Desegregation Plan have already been placed at the Incentive Schools. The positions include: o Assistant principals for Rockefeller \u0026amp; Franklin o Classroom Teachers o Counselor o Media Specialist o Music Teacher o Art Teacher o P.E. Teacher o Auxiliary Teacher {permanent substitute) o Reading Teacher (remediation) o Math Teacher (remediation) o Computer Lab Attendant o Resource Teacher o Speech Teacher o Media Clerk o Instructional Aide (classroom) o Theme Specialist o Principal o Supervision Aides (cafeteria and playground) The plan clearly states that a needs assessment should be conducted to determine the basis for adding any unfilled positions. A needs assessment was conducted by the Staffing Committee at each Incentive School in February of 1993, to consider the positions of assistant principals, social workers, Spanish teachers, and alternative classroom specialists added to each Incentive School staff. B. C. D. Problem Definition The data received from the needs assessment conducted at each school indicated a need for the following positions: 1) Four assistant principals 2) Four full-time social workers 3) A Spanish teacher 4) Two alternative classroom specialists The staffing committees held lengthy discussions on these positions to determine whether or not these were absolute needs. Adding a full-time social worker at Franklin and Rockefeller will eliminate the need for an alternative classroom specialist. The Board did not approve additional assistant principals for incentive schools in the 1993-94 budget. Rather than add a Spanish teacher at every incentive school for the 1993-94 school year, the Board supported phasing in a pilot program at two (2) incentive schools as recommended by the Staffing Committee. The budget impact of adding four (4) social workers and one (l) Spanish teacher will cost the District approximately $165,000 for the 1993-94 school year. Analysis of Alternatives After compiling and analyzing the data of the needs assessments, each Incentive Schools' Staffing Committee was responsible for writing a statement of rationale to support their findings and recommendations. The staffing recommendations were then prioritized according to the most dire needs at each school. Any other alternative to form a basis for adding unfilled positions would be contrary to the process identified in the Desegregation Plan. Recommendation The specific placement of the recommended positions are as follows: Rockefeller: Full-time Social Worker Half-time Spanish Teacher Garland: Franklin: Full-time Social Worker Full-time Social Worker E. F. Rightsell: Mitchell: Half-time Social Worker Half-time Spanish Teacher Half-time Social Worker* * We already have one (1) full time social worker for incentive schools. We propose to use this person one-half (1/2) time at Ish and Stephens, which will give all incentive schools at least a one-half (1/2) time social worker. Objectives The objective of the recommendation is to meet the needs of each Incentive School community and to further implement our Desegregation Plan. Because school community needs are constantly changing, a needs assessment should be conducted yearly to determine the basis for continuing staffed positions. The specific duties, responsibilities and activities of each position should be analyzed to evaluate program need and position effectiveness. Impact Analysis The expected positive impact of adding additional positions to the Incentive Schools hopefully is an increase in student achievement and success. The possible negative impact of adding additional positions to the Incentive Schools might be that the comparatively low student enrollments at the Incentive Schools may cause duties and responsibilities of various positions to overlap and be perceived as a non-essential staff position. However, a recent court order does state that the addition of staff positions should not be based on enrollment, rather the need for such positions. Resources Analysis The desegregation budget will be impacted by an additional salary expenditure of $162,000 for the 1993-94 school year. Instructional materials, training, and other program costs are estimated to be an additional $3,000. BUSINESS CASE SAFETY AND SECURITY DEPARTMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 1989, after the unfortunate shooting of a student at a Little Rock Junior High School, the Board of Directors authorized the Administration to conduct a safety and security study. This study was to address the security issue on campuses, on buses, and in the neighborhoods surrounding the schools. The Board of Directors made the decision to have a committee from each school study the various safety and security issues in the LRSD. A Task Force was formed that 1. Held public hearings 2. Met with Parent-Teacher groups and/or their designated leaders 3. Interviewed city and community leaders 4. Reviewed secondary school safety and security issues in other urban school districts The Task Force enlisted the expertise of the National School Safety Center who sent its Deputy Director to Little Rock for one week and on later follow-up visits. The Task Force report was dealt with by issuing twenty (20) major recommendations to use as an outline to build a strong, effective safety and security program for the Little Rock School District. Recommendation No. 18 in this report was to establish a school district office of Safety and Security. A. Background 1. At present, the Safety and Security Department is composed of a Director of Safety and Security, two supervisors, and one person who answers all alarm calls to the various sights, meets the police that have been dispatched, and secures the buildings upon completion of his report. There are thirty-six (36) School Based Security Officers assigned to the secondary schools in the LRSD. A recommended addition is the addition of fourteen (14) School Resource Officers. School Resource Officers (SRO) will be assigned to the current secondary schools. A School Resource Officer is a commissioned law enforcement officer that is assigned to the local school district. Safety and Security Page Two B. C. 2. School security is a problem that is currently concerning both school district employees and members of the community throughout the nation. The idea of School Resource Officers and security forces is certainly not a new idea. It is, however, fairly new to the State of Arkansas. The problem of dealing effectively with unruly students and community members has been an ongoing problem through the country for many years. Districts across the country are having to develop plans, policies, and strategies for coping with these issues and the resulting increase of fights, assaults, homicides, drive-by shootings, weapons, and general disruption to previously \"quiet\" schools. Problem Definition 1. Various approaches to better safety and security in the schools have been attempted. It must be recognized that there is no one single approach that will solve the multitude of problems. The School Resource Officer approach is, however, one that has been successful throughout the country in dealing with the various acting out behaviors and in helping create a bridge between local law enforcement and troubled youth in the community. Analysis of Alternatives 1. Many alternatives have been approached in solving the problems. The LRSD has not discarded any of our approaches only attempted to bring new answers to the problem. The National School Safety Center, an advocate of School Resource Officers, supplied this office with information on these programs throughout the country. Visits were made to programs in California and Florida. Numerous telephone conferences were held with Resource Officers on duty in different schools. The Little Rock School District looked at these different options: a. b. Do nothing: A number of school districts do not need a formal security program that involves Resource Officers. With the problems facing the City of Little Rock and the schools in the Little Rock District this option was not chosen. ~ with a guard service. Two private guard services were contacted. Neither of these services had any experience in providing a security force that had expertise in dealing with the diverse student population in our community. Few training programs were available through these groups. Additionally, these groups seemed to have a lack of commitment to and understanding of our educational philosophy. Safety and Security Page Three c. Employ School Resource Officers. Historically, police have played a significant role in public education. They have been involved in handling truancy, juvenile crime, and major collective disturbances. Personnel are trained. The size of the force can be down-sized when needed. A pre-employment background check is always completed and support personnel is available. A formal agreement is prepared that identifies duties and responsibilities of both the police department and the school district. D. Recommendations E. 1. The Little Rock School District recommends that alternative number 3 be employed. It is our belief that School Resource Officers will help provide a balance between crime prevention, education, enforcement, and informed positive contacts. A School Resource Officer will help develop relationships with students. The School Resource Officer will lay a foundation for student confidence and trust by demonstrating both a knowledge and an interest in matters of child advocacy. Objectives 1. Objectives to the recommendation. Program objectives are: a. To prevent students from becoming involved in behaviors that violate state statutes, city codes, and District policy b. To establish an improved rapport between law enforcement officers and youth c. To assist the building staff and administration in providing security for students d. To act as a resource to staff and students in legal matters and violence prevention intervention e. To help to provide an educational environment that offers prevention programs in determining youth involvement in gang activities, crime, alcohol, and drug abuse f. To assist in the coordination of community resources in promoting interagency approaches to the solution of community youth problems Safety and Security Page Four F. 2. Good Support. One of the prerequisites for students to have a chance to learn is to have a safe, secure environment in which to learn. District level goals that would increase educational achievement with emphasis on closing disparities certainly fall within this area. A safe, secure environment is also necessary for students and staff if the following goals are to be reached: a. Providing equitable educational opportunities for all students in a desegregated learning environment b. Enabling all students to develop a lifelong capacity and love for learning c. Teaching all students to be productive contributors in the school, the community, and the work place d. Providing a disciplined, structured learning environment for all students 3. Evaluation Criteria. Evaluation criteria for the School Resource Officer Program include: a. Written evaluation by principals, including suggested improvements b. Written evaluation by school resource officer, including suggested improvements c. Survey of all staff members of schools d. Survey 10% of students, including high school and junior high school students e. Survey 10% of parents of high school and junior high school students f. Compare pre and post data for suspension, attendance, and dropout incidents involving unauthorized non-students on campus and juveniles processed into the juvenile justice system Impact Analysis 1. Program. It is expected that this program will have a positive effect on both the schools and the community. Additional role models, both male and female, will be visible to all children. These officers will be able to provide Safety and Security Page Five G. assistance to students and staff in legal matters. Various crime prevention, drug and alcohol programs will be presented to students. It is expected that the relationship between students and their respect for the law will be a positive move for our community. Some of the built-in mistrust of \"police types\" will be affected. The added protection of a qualified law enforcement officer that is available at all times will also present a positive impact. 2. Desegregation Plan. There will be no negative impact upon the Desegregation Plan. All employees are expected to work together to promote adherence to the Plan. 3. Court Orders. No impact is known. 4. Political Factors. No political factors will have impact upon this program. 5. Risks. Any new program has risks that accompany the program. Schools face the risk of becoming overly dependant on police personnel to solve problems. Police officers generally have not been schooled in educational philosophy. Police lack the flexibility that school administrators have in dealing with student off enders. A special inservice program will be given to all involved before the program will be implemented. After three years of program planning, the administration believes that the community is ready for this program. 6. Timing. The major issues are the extensive training required to replace officers that join this program. The City of Little Rock must take that into account before accepting the program. The Little Rock School District must plan inservice activities before placing the program in action. These programs will be completed prior to program implementation. Resource Analysis 1. Personnel Analysis. Fourteen School Resource Officers will be added to the district staff. One support person, a LRPD supervisor, will perform support duties to the program. Personnel will be recruited from the ranks of the Little Rock Police Department. 2. Financial Analysis. Operating costs have been prepared and submitted by the City of Little Rock. Under the proposed plan, costs will be shared between the city and the Little Rock School District on a 50/50 basis. The Little Rock School District's expense for the first year of operation will be $203,000. This cost will fund fourteen (14) police resource officer positions. Safety and Security Page Six H. These costs are valid for the 1993 school year. A 5% cost of living type of increase in overall personnel costs should be planned for 1994. Additionally, the second year personnel costs should include an additional $34,079 for employee step increases plus $20,000 to pay for benefit increases such as educational pay and longevity. Force Field Analysis 1. Forces For. The primary support of this recommendation will likely be the principals in the affected schools. In addition, teachers in the schools affected will likely form a group that will support this move. It is my opinion that all Board members will support this recommendation. Support will come from these groups because each of the groups has studied this option for approximately three years. They have been presented with both pros and cons of the program. Parents will be a support of this recommendation. All calls to my office have been supportive. 2. Forces Against. The only persons to have voiced concerns in the past have seemed to have the feeling that the policeman may use his authority in an abusive manner. The success of the program for a one semester trial at McClellan High School was discussed at a recent meeting. Board members who had voted in a negative manner in the past seemed to have changed their minds and talked in a positive manner. I. Implementation begins with approval by the governing bodies of both the City of Little Rock and the Little Rock School District. Following approval, meetings will be held with Little Rock Police Department officials to determine starting dates for training newly hired officers to supplement the officers that are selected to become School Resource Officers. Additionally, both the LRSD and LRPD will offer training sessions for officers selected to begin the Resource Officer program. Bill Barnhouse, Director of Safety and Security, will assume the task of scheduling all events that will ensure a successful program implementation. All status reports for program implementation will be submitted to the Manager of Resources and School Support, Little Rock School District. ADDITIONAL BUDGET EXPENDITURES ABACUS - INSTRUCTIONAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Little Rock School District is committed to a comprehensive desegregation plan which focuses on the total learning environment for all students. The method of assigning these students is the first step in creating school and classroom environments that foster academic achievement and improve race relations between students and staff members. The next step involves a commitment to quality desegregated education by the District, the parents, and the community. The commitment requires a plan of action predicated upon the District's commitment to remaining solvent, while providing quality desegregated education for its students. The Educational Audit pointed out the curriculum must be reviewed, revised as necessary, developed in an appropriate scope and sequence, and capable of supporting carefully-written objectives. Not until this was done could we move forward to address in a meaningful way the evaluation of effective teaching and the assessment of student learning. Instructional management systems are very effective and helpful in tracking the progress of individual students and providing corrective prescriptions to improve learning. A. BACKGROUND The Little Rock School District remains committed to providing teachers and principals with the training and technical support necessary to ensure that the Abacus system is used by teachers as a viable instructional management tool. In order to fulfill this commitment using District resources currently available, all principals were trained during the first semester, but the original plan for training all K-12 core-area teachers during the 1992-93 school year was modified and, thus, the initial schedule for training was revised. During the 1992-93 school year, the Abacus system is being implemented in a limited number of schools. All K-9 core-area teachers, specialists, and administrators in these schools were trained to use the system for management instruction in core content areas of the revised curriculum. Because of the large number of schools applying for the limited spaced available in the pilot project, the District decided to conduct two (2) cycles of the pilot training in order to include more schools in the project. The schools chosen to participate in each cycle were as follows: Cycle I Mabelvale Jr. High Southwest Jr. High Baseline Carver Dodd Geyer Springs Gibbs Mitchell Rightsell Romine Terry Cycle II Badgett Booker Chicot Forest Park Ish Jefferson Meadowcliff Otter Creek Pulaski Heights El. Watson Woodruff Each cycle was divided into two phases of training: the first phase consisted of K-9 corearea teachers in each pilot school attending two half-day training sessions\nthe second phase consisted of individual technical assistance conducted by the Staff Development Specialists at the local pilot schools. Additional training for the teachers trained this past summer was also provided. After teachers had completed two training sessions, the Staff Development Specialists spent four to six ( 4-6) days in each school providing Phase II training, which consisted of individual technical assistance to the teachers as they used the Abacus system. This assistance was provided according to a schedule developed cooperatively by each teacher and the Staff Development Specialists. Following completion of the in-school technical assistance, additional class sessions and/or further in-school training will be scheduled and conducted according to the needs of the participants. Several optional Abacus review /refresher workshops were scheduled for those teachers who were originally trained this past summer at the IBM center. These workshops were conducted at Metropolitan during the AEA Convention. Session 1 - November 5, 1992 -- 8:30 - 11:30 a.m. Session 2 - November 5, 1992 -- 12:30 - 3:30 p.m. Session 3 - November 6, 1992 -- 8:30 - 11:30 a.m. Each session was limited to 20 participants per session. The remaining schools are targeted for initial training this summer and during the 1993- 94 school year. B. PROBLEM DEFINITION The District must determine the most appropriate way to complete the training for the remaining schools and how to provide additional technical assistance and support to all schools. The new curriculum offers core content area teachers flexibility in making the best uses of an almost infinite number of assessment possibilities. Teachers realize that assessing student progress is an ongoing part of the instructional process, and most teachers incorporate a variety of assessment strategies into the daily teaching/learning routine. With the new core curriculum, teachers can ensure that students are mastering the grade level objectives by correlating their assessment methods, along with their instructional strategies, to the identified objectives. Since teachers have the freedom to arrange the objectives so that they fit the learner's needs and the teacher's style, they must also choose how to assess. Teachers will continue to use standardized chapter tests and other similar mass-produced assessment with caution. The new curriculum has been designed by LR teachers for LR teachers. The objectives in all core areas are linked to specific learner outcomes, and any assessment must reflect individual student progress consistent with the aims of those outcomes. To assist teachers in the assessment process, a test item bank that is aligned with the District's curriculum is available through the Instructional Management System. The test item bank will be expanded to include more test items by the beginning of the 1993-94 school year. Remaining teachers need to be trained in order to access the test items. C. ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES The District needs to determine the most efficient and user-friendly method of completing this needed training. We have given a great deal of thought and discussion as to the most cost-effective means of providing this training. Feedback from staff in pilot schools was secured in determining what worked and what did not work in Cycle I and II training sessions this school year. A District-wide instructional management system is needed to help us track the progress of individual students and to provide corrective prescriptions to improve teaching and learning. We can no longer wait until spring each year to know whether or not our students have mastered the objectives in our curriculum. D. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the District fully implement the Abacus Instructional Management System during the 1993-94 school year. During the 1992-93 school year, 22 schools participated in the piloting of the Instructional Management System. The pilot schools assisted us in learning to effectively train staff and to work out expected \"glitches\" in the System. The rationale for this recommendation is that the management system, fully operational, can provide: Parents Continuous monitoring of individual student progress. Detailed reports for conferences, Board of Directors, and the Office of Desegregation and Monitoring. Immediate feedback on test results with diagnostic information. Comprehensive library of learning resources. Capability to create, store, and print tests. The Abacus Instructional Management System provides ways to help make the parent an integral part of their student's learning process. It will: Provide reports showing the learning objectives and instructional goals to be mastered. Provide regular and timely update reports showing current progress toward those instructional goals. Clearly show parents which learning objectives have not been mastered or not attempted. Provide suggested instructional resource listings which the parent can use to supplement classroom instruction in areas where the student needs help. Enhance parent/teacher cooperation. E. OBJECTIVE The objective of this recommendation is to fully utilize technology to uniformly manage and monitor instruction as indicated in the desegregation plan. The District needs this technology to help it evaluate programs that are working and to secure the necessary data to assist us in eliminating programs that are not working. Technology, used appropriately, can save staff many hours of manual labor and can provide uniform and consistent reporting of student learning and student mastery of the curriculum. Evaluation Criteria  Continuous monitoring of student progress. Timely, detailed reports for conferences, administration, Board of Directors, and the Office of Desegregation and Monitoring. Increased teacher use of test item bank. Increased use of mastery reports by teachers and principals to intervene in student learning. Increased use of the System by reluctant users. Increased use of mastery reports to parents regarding student learning. F. IMPACT A AL YSIS The Instructional Management System has the potential for assisting the District in gathering data for reports, monitoring and evaluating teaching and learning, and tracking student progress. Reliable data are needed to make professional judgements regarding the effectiveness of District programs. It is important to provide student, class, school, and District Objective Mastery Analysis and Summary. The System can provide a rich and stimulating instructional resource bank that will assist teachers, librarians, media clerks, and parents. Desegregation Plan District-wide implementation of the Instructional Management System will allow us to achieve another objective in our desegregation plan: the use of an instructional management system that will track student progress. Court Orders The District has committed to the utilization of an instructional management system, and this commitment has been noted by the Court. Political Factors The District can receive favorable responses from the community and schools if it commits the necessary resources to correctly implement the System. Risks The quality of support and services provided by the schools and patrons can be positive if implemented correctly. The additional funds requested will be viewed as a wise investment. Should the District decide not to support this system, the results can be very negative and regarded as \"just another gimmick.\" Timing Decisions regarding full implementation should be made prior to teachers and principals going off contract. It will be necessary to begin training the remaining elementary teachers prior to the beginning of school. G. RESOURCES ANALYSIS Provided is a listing of personnel that must be trained to use the Instructional Management System. Included is the projected budget for staff development of teachers. We have developed several implementation plans for your consideration. They are included in this Business Case. The Administration recommends the Board of Directors consider Plan 2 for implementation for the 1993-94 school year. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 PROJECTED BUDGET FOR 1993-94 ABACUS TRAINING I. Secondary 45 teachers ( 4 per each of 11 secondary schools and 1 from Alternative Leaming Center) A. One day of training @ $100 per teacher B. Yearly stipends @ $1,000 per teacher II. Elementary A. One day of training for 440 teachers including G/T, Special Education, Math, and Reading Specialists @ $100 per teachers OR One day of training for 344 teachers including ONLY regular classroom teachers @ $100 per teacher B. One-half day training for 37 designated teachers providing technical support @ $50 per teacher C. Yearly stipends for 37 teachers providing technical support @ $500 per teacher $4,500.00 $45,000.00 $44,000.00 OR $34,000.00 $1,850.00 $18,500.00 TOT AL WITH 440 ELEMENTARY TEACHERS $113,850.00 TOTAL WITH 344 ELEMENTARY TEACHERS $104,250.00 NOTE: If a 10 station lab is used, a total of 51 days will be needed for the above training if 440 elementary teachers are trained, or a total of 42 days will be needed if 344 elementary teachers are trained. If a 15 station lab is used, a total of 35 days will be needed for the above training if 440 elementary teachers are trained, or a total of 28 days will be needed if 344 elementary teachers are trained. The following budget assumes full implementation of all schools except Metropolitan during the 1993-94 school year. It uses current enrollment numbers with the addition of King School's projected enrollment. It does not include any additional personnel costs. Additional equipment numbers are based on having four stations at school with enrollment \u0026gt; 1000 students, three stations at schools with \u0026gt; 800 students, and two stations at schools with enrollments \u0026gt; 600 students. Those schools with less than 600 students would have only one (1) work station. We would have two printers and two scanners only at those locations with four PC's. All other locations would share one printer and one scanner. 52 PC's 7 Laser Printers 13 Sentry 3000 Scanners Total Forms Printer Cartridges In-district Printing Total $1,676.00 3,995.00 3,520.00 Grand Total Equipment/Supplies TOTAL ABACUS BUDGET 1993-94: Equipment/Supplies Inservice for 440 Elementary Teachers Inservice for Secondary Teachers Total OR Equipment/Supplies Inservice for 344 Elementary Teachers Inservice for Secondary Teachers Total $ 87,152.00 27,965.00 45,760.00 $160,877.00 $ 40,000.00 ~ ~ ~ 10,540.00 3,520.00 $ 54,060.00 $214,937.00 $214,937.00 113,850.00 49,500.00 $214,937.00 104,250.00 49,500.00 $378,287.00 $368,687.00 ABACUS TRAINING FOR 1993-94 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2 1. Train only the remaining elementary and secondary schools and provide maintenance for the original pilot schools. .,(A,,/, 1)f11\u0026gt;1.,.Ta?e 2. Add five (5) technicians~ Data Processin~ provide district-wide technical assistance. 3. Designate one (1) teacher in each elementary school to provide technical assistance within the school\neach person will receive a $500 stipend. Training Costs for Plan 2 a. Training July 26 - August 13 Participants: Four (4) remaining incentive schools and King Review Session 3 pilot incentive schools Training for in-school technical person If the above staff members are not on contract, stipends of approximately $50 per day per teacher for approximately 240 teachers $12,000.00 b. Training August 30 - October 4 Participants: Twelve (12) remaining elementary schools Training for in-school technical person One (1) day substitute for approximately 340 teachers @ approximately $30 per day per substitute 10,200.00 c. Remaining eleven (11) secondary schools of approximately 400 teachers added to this plan - $30 per one day substitute for each of the 400 teachers 12,000.00 d. Stipends (approx. $500 per school) 25,000.00 e. Five (5) technicians @ $13,000 each 65,000.00 TOTAL $124,200.00 Training Schedule for Plan 2 Note: the following schedule is based on a 15 station Abacus lab. July 26 - August 13: Remaining incentive schools, King, and Review Sessions for 3 pilot incentive schools (240 teachers\none (1) full day per teacher and one additional full day for technical persons\nif not on contract, a stipend of approximately $50 per day) July 26 - Franklin July 27 - Franklin July 28 - Garland July 29 - Garland and Rockefeller July 30 - Rockefeller August 2 - Stephens August 3 - King August 4 - King August 5 - Review for Ish August 6 - Review for Mitchell August 9 - Review for Mitchell and Rightsell August 10 - Review for Rightsell August 11 - In-school Technical Person (12 schools) August 12 - In-school Technical Person (12 schools) August 13 - In-school Technical Person (13 schools) August 30 - October 4: Tuelve (12) remaining elementary schools and 37 technical persons (340 teachers\ntwo (2) half-day sessions per teacher\none full day for technical person\nuse substitutes) August 30 and September 15 August 31 and September 16 Bale (8) Brady (8) Cloverdale El. (6) Fair Park (4) Fulbright (4) Bale (8) Brady (8) Cloverdale El. ( 6) Fair Park (4) Fulbright (4) September 1 and September 17 September 2 and September 20 September 3 and September 21 September 6 and September 23 September 9 and September 24 September 10 and September 27 September 13 and September 28 September 14 and September 29 Bale (4) Brady (6) Fair Park (4) Fulbright (8) Mabelvale El. (6) Fair Park (8) Fulbright (8) Mabelvale El. (8) McDermott (6) Fulbright (2) Mabelvale El. (6) McDermott (8) Wakefield (8) Washington (6) Mabelvale El. ( 6) McDermott (8) Wakefield (8) Washington (10) McDermott (6) Wakefield (8) Washington (10) Western Hills (6) Wakefield (2) Washington (10) Western Hills (8) Williams (10) Washington (4) Western Hills (6) Williams (10) Wilson (10) Washington (8) Williams (8) Wilson ( 10) September 30 - In-school Technical Person (12 schools) October 1 October 4 - In-school Technical Person (12 schools) - In-school Technical Person (13 schools) October 14 - January 7: Eleven (11) remaining secondary schools ( 408 teachers @ 20 per day\ntwo half-day sessions per teacher) October 14 and November 19 October 15 and November 22 October 18 and November 23 October 19 and November 29 October 20 and November 30 October 21 and December 1 October 26 and December 2 October 27 and December 3 October 28 and December 6 October 29 and December 7 November 1 and December 8 November 2 and December 9 November 8 and December 10 Cloverdale Jr. ( 10) Dunbar (10) Cloverdale Jr. (10) Dunbar (10) Cloverdale Jr. (10) Dunbar (10) Forest Heights ( 10) Henderson (10) Forest Heights (10) Henderson (10) Forest Heights ( 10) Henderson (10) Henderson (8) Mann (6) Pulaski Heights Jr. (6) Mann (10) Pulaski Heights Jr. ( 10) Mann (10) Pulaski Heights Jr. (10) Mann (14) Pulaski Heights Jr. (4) Central (12) Fair (4) Hall (4) Central (12) Fair (4) Hall (4) Central (12) Fair (4) Hall (4) November 9 and December 13 Central ( 12) Fair (4) Hall (4) November 10 and December 14 Central (8) Fair (8) Hall (4) November 11 and December 15 Central (4) Fair (6) Hall (10) November 12 and December 16 Fair (4) Hall (10) McClellan (6) November 15 and January 4 Fair (2) McClellan (9) Parkview (9) November 16 and January 5 McClellan (10) Parkview (10) November 17 and January 6 McClellan (10) Parkview (10) November 18 and January 7 McClellan (2) Parkview (8) BUDGET- ABACUS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2 The following budget assumes full implementation of all schools except Metropolitan during the 1993- 94 school year. It uses current enrollment numbers with the addition of King School's projected enrollment. Additional equipment numbers are based on having four stations at school with enrollment \u0026gt; 1000 students, three stations at schools with \u0026gt; 800 students, and two stations at schools with enrollments \u0026gt;600 students. Those schools with less than 600 students would have only one (1) work station. We would have two printers and two scanners only at those locations with four PC's. All other locations would share one printer and one scanner. 52 PC's 7 Laser Printers 13 Sentry 3000 Scanners Total Forms Printer Cartridges In-district Printing Total $1,676.00 3,995.00 3,520.00 Grand Total Equipment/Supplies .GRAND TQTALA.BACUS BUDGET 1993-94 Equipment/Supplies Stipends for 580 Elementary Teachers Stipends for 400 Secondary Teachers Stipends for one (1) teacher tech. asst. per school (50) Stipends for five (5) computer technicians Total $ 87,152.00 27,965.00 45,760.00 $160,877.00 $ 40,000.00 10,540.00 3,520.00 $ 54,060.00 $214,937.00 $214,937.00 22,200.00 12,000.00 ,1 .. ,o 1-i-\"'11., 25,000.00 65.000.00 $339,137.00 ABACUS TRAINING FOR 1993-94 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 3 1. Train only the remainder of the elementary schools and provide maintenance for the original pilot schools. 2. Add five (5) technicians in Data Processing to providfe district-wide technical assistance. 3. Designate one (1) teacher in each elementary school to provide technical assistance within the school\neach person will receive a $500 stipend. Training Costs for Plan 3 a. Training July 26 - August 13 Participants: Four (4) remaining incentive schools and King Review Session 3 pilot incentive schools Training for in-school technical person If the above staff members are not on contract, stipends of approximately $50 per day per teacher for approximately 240 teachers $12,000.00 b. Training August 30 - October 4 Participants: C. Twelve (12) remaining elementary schools Training for in-school technical person One (1) day substitute for approximately 340 teachers @ approximately $30 per day per substitute $10,200.00 Stipends (approx. $500 per school) $19,000.00 $41,200.00 Training Schedule for Plan 3 Note: the following schedule is based on a 15 station Abacus lab. July 26 - August 13: Remaining incentive schools, King, and Review Sessions for all pilot incentive schools (240 teachers\none (1) full day per teacher and one additional full day for technical persons\nif not on contract, a stipend of approximately $50 per day) July 26 - Franklin July 27 - Franklin July 28 - Garland July 29 - Garland and Rockefeller July 30 - Rockefeller August 2 - Stephens August 3 - Kfog August 4 - King August 5 - Review for Ish August 6 - Review for Mitchell August 9 - Review for Mitchell and Rightsell August 10 - Review for Rightsell August 11 - In-school Technical Person (12 schools) August 12 - In-school Technical Person (12 schools) August 13 - In-school Technical Person (13 schools) August 30 - October 4: Tuelve (12) remaining elementary schools and 37 technical persons (340 teachers\ntwo (2) half-day sessions per teacher\none full day for technical person\nuse substitutes) August 30 and September 15 August 31 and September 16 Bale (8) Brady (8) Cloverdale El. (6) Fair Park (4) Fulbright (4) Bale (8) Brady (8) Cloverdale El. (6) Fair Park ( 4) Fulbright (4) September 1 and September 17 September 2 and September 20 September 3 and September 21 September 8 and September 23 September 9 and September 24 September 10 and September 27 September 13 and September 28 September 14 and September 29 Bale (4) Brady (6) Fair Park (4) Fulbright (8) Mabelvale El. (6) Fair Park (8) Fulbright (8) Mabelvale El. (8) McDermott (6) Fulbright (2) Mabelvale El. (6) McDermott (8) Wakefield (8) Washington (6) Mabelvale El. (6) McDermott (8) Wakefield (8) Washington (10) McDermott (6) Wakefield (8) Washington (10) Western Hills (6) Wakefield (2) Washington (10) Western Hills (8) Williams (10) Washington (4) Western Hills (6) Williams (10) Wilson (10) Washington (8) Williams (8) Wilson (10) September 30 - In-school Technical Person (12 schools) October 1 October 4 - In-school Technical Person ( 12 schools) - In-school Technical Person (13 schools) BUDGET - ABACUS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 3 The following budget assumes full implementation of all elementary schools during the 1993-94 school year. It uses current enrollment numbers with the addition of King School's projected enrollment. Additional equipment numbers are based on having four stations at school with enrollment \u0026gt; 1000 students, three stations at schools with \u0026gt; 800 students, and two stations at schools with enrollments \u0026gt;600 students. Those schools with less than 600 students would have only one (1) work station. We would have two printers and two scanners only at those locations with four PC's. All other locations would share one printer and one scanner. 27 PC's 9 Laser Printers 13 Sentry 3000 Scanners Total Forms $1,676.00 3,995.00 3,520.00 Printer Cartridges (56) 170.00 In-district Printing Total Grand Total Equipment/Supplies Equipment/Supplies Stipends for 580 Elementary Teachers Stipends for one (1) teacher technical asst. per school (38) Stipends for five (5) computer technicians Total $ 45,252.00 35,955.00 45.760.00 $126,967.00 $ 21,000.00 9,520.00 3.520.00 $ 34,040.00 $161.007.00 $161,007.00 22,200.00 19,000.00 65.000.00 $267,207.00 A. Background Decision Analysis of Secretarial Position for Desegregation Office Submitted by Arma J. Hart Executive Summary The position of Desegregation Facilitator is a requirement of the desegregation plan and was, therefore, newly instituted at the beginning of the 1991-92 school year. A new office had to be set up and a secretary was moved from the Business Office to assist in carrying out the technical and clerical responsibilities required by the position. Several weeks later, a Federal Programs Director was hired and the same secretary was assigned to assist both administrators on a half-time basis. The responsibility of the positions for the Desegregation Facilitator and the Federal ~ ~ Programs Director is monumental. The Desegregation Facilitator generated monthly ~ ~--  ./ desegregation reports for the Desegregation Associate Superintendent and the School ~ ~ Board\nplanned, gathered materials, organized and conducted monthly meetings in order to inform, clarify, interpret and assist Incentive School principals with a new desegregation plan. The superintendent and other administrators were to be kept informed when the district was not in compliance. Materials and equipment were ordered and resources were recommended in order to supplement the comprehensive programs during the regular school day, extended day, and on Saturdays. Meetings were held with all teachers and parents to explain the Incentive School program, expectations, and specific roles as they related to ensuring student academic, social, and emotional needs. Recruitment efforts were planned and a Speakers Bureau consisting of teachers and parents was formed in Incentive Schools and at Romine Interdistrict School for desegregation purposes. Training was held for this committee as well as other newly formed parent groups. Night recruitment meetings were held in the Little Rock and Pulaski County Special School Districts to assist with desegregation in both districts. Recruitment meetings were planned by the desegregation facilitator and held every Wednesday at 9:00 a.m. to make sure a recruitment plan was being carried out in the district. Decision Analysis - Executive Summary Desegregation Office Page 2 This office was also responsible for canvassing neighborhoods\nsetting up luncheon meetings with community people\nassisting with the development of a recruitment plan for Martin Luther King School\nmeeting with the City Board of Directors\nplanning programs and scheduling quality extended year summer school programs based -on the needs of children. Checklists were developed for monitoring purposes, test data and student and parent surveys were reviewed. The results were then interpreted, and the impact on integration and desegregation was reported to principals. I attended monthly biracial committee and parent council meetings and presented information as needed on Incentive Schools\nheld parent meetings, responded to parent complaints, and set up criteria for a Parent Night meeting in all Incentive Schools. The job description encompasses that of both an Assistant Superintendent and a Desegregation Facilitator. Therefore, because of the enormous responsibility of providing technical assistance to the schools, monitoring and evaluating programs and staff, addressing facility needs, and other problems that impede desegregation, a substitute secretarial position was approved by the Superintendent during the 1991-92 school year. The substitute was hired to assist the Desegregation Facilitator with typing, filing, answering the phone, scheduling meetings, answering questions about the plan, distributing information to principals and the school communities, responding to principal, parent, and teacher complaints and requests, ordering equipment and supplies, etc. To read the job description of the Desegregation Facilitator and to know what is required in the Incentive Schools is to know that a secretary is needed (see attached job description). The new Federal Programs Director's responsibilities increased as federal and state requirements increased and has continued to do so during the 1992-93 school year. Among the many responsibilities of this administrator is to prepare and submit applications for ongoing federal funding, to supervise all activities paid by these funds, to write and approve all federal project proposals, to compile and maintain written records and reports on results of all federal projects and disseminate this information throughout the district (see job description). With the monumental responsibilities of this position, the State Department personnel noted that in districts with student enrollments that are less than those of the LRSD, at least three clerical persons are needed to do an effective job. Additionally, there are ten private schools that are under the supervision of this office and many state and federal deadlines to meet. Decision Analysis - Executive Summary Desegregation Office Page 3 B. Problem Definition A permanent secretarial position is needed for the Office of the Desegregation Facilitator to provide stability and effective and efficient service. Three very good substitute secretaries left the office after they were trained and understood the functions of the Desegregation Office and its importance. Each of these persons left to obtain permanent positions so they could accrue medical benefits, seniority, etc. This problem is acute and is not cost effective to the district because of the many hours lost in interviewing and training new substitutes rather than hiring a permanent, but efficient, secretary who can meet the needs of the office. C. Analysis of Alternatives '}I, ~......#4 __,/) A need is a gap between current results and required results, as a gap m results between \"what is\" and \"what should be.\" The process that I used in analyzing alternatives for a permanent secretarial position, was to compare the effectiveness of the Desegregation 11.b~ Office with a half-time secretary that is also shared by a Federal Programs Director f..J ~ compared with a full-time substitute that works only for the Desegregation Office. When 'J0 ,J:r~~.:, using a shared secretary, additional secretarial help is often requested from at least two or rr,---.-... three other secretaries on the second floor of the building. Often they are busy with their own assignments. When they are, reports or mail outs are not produced in a timely manner. When some of the reports are confidential, there is a degree of concern regarding public disclosure. A negative impact is hiring a full-time substitute who leaves her employment in my office in the middle of an assignment after finding a permanent position. D. Recommendations Based on the defined problem of not having a secretary, and after carefully analyzing the facts, I am recommending that a full-time secretary be hired immediately. This information was shared with the superintendent and approved over two months ago. Decision Analysis - Executive Summary Desegregation Office Page 4 E. Objectives 1. Objective of the Recommendation To hire an office secretary for the Desegregation Facilitator who will provide effective and efficient service and support so that the maximum positive impact of that office can be realized. 2. Goal Support Having an effective Desegregation Office secretary will indirectly support the desegregation plan and the district's goals of (a) establishing climates of educational excellence and equity in all schools and (b) enhancing human relation skills for principals, teachers, and central office administration. These goals can be achieved through support by the Desegregation Facilitator by having efficient and effective office personnel. 3. Evaluation Criteria The effectiveness of this position can be measured by product outcomes, efficiency of service, comments from principals, parents, district personnel, visitors, etc. 4. Expected Benefits Typing, filing, reports, etc. are expected to be completed in a timely manner. A well- run office will allow information related to the desegregation plan to flow to the parents, students, and district administrators from the Desegregation Facilitator in timely manner. This positive impact will enhance the entire district as an organization and the community it serves. F. Impact Analysis 1. Program If information is not disseminated to the schools and or community in an efficient and effective manner, it will have an adverse effect on the programs in the schools. 2. Desegregation Plan If there is ineffective written and/or oral communication due to the lack of adequate office personnel, the desegregation plan will definitely be negatively impacted. 3. Court Orders Information not submitted to principals by the secretary in a timely manner and interpreted by the Desegregation Facilitator will have an adverse effect on the district. Decision Analysis - Executive Summary Desegregation Office Page 5 4. Political Factors Due to the district's present position on hiring, other persons in the district, unless informed, will perceive this addition of staff as inconsistent with the budget reductions. 5. Risks The risks are to hear complaints from other secretaries in the district who want to fill the vacant position, or from other secretaries who were cut. The risks of not hiring a full-time, competent secretary to run the Desegregation Office is to not assume the responsibility of supporting the desegregation plan as effectively as it should be. Because of the workload and number of reports to be generated, the position requires a secretary who has good organizational skills, maturity, types accurately, is skilled on the computer, has good written and oral communication skills, and has a knowledge and understanding of the desegregation plan. 6. Timing This position needs to be filled as soon as the interview process is completed. The secretary should be hired no later than June 1, 1993. G. Resource Analysis 1. Personnel Analysis The position of Desegregation Facilitator is equivalent to that of the Assistant Superintendent. The workload as evidenced by the job description and the many elements in the desegregation plan requires a high level secretary that can run the office effectively at all times. A recruiting pool by which a secretary is merely placed based on seniority in the district will not suffice. 2. Financial Analysis The salary cost of this position is $21,500. The cost to the district can only be measured by the time lost running around the building to solicit other secretarial help and the loss of commitment to the desegregation plan. Time is money. Decision Analysis - Executive Summary Desegregation Office Page 6 H. Force Field Analysis 1. Forces For Principals Parent and teacher committees Parents in school communities Federal Programs secretary and director Desegregation Facilitator Some district secretaries who are favorable toward the the recommendation of hiring a full-time secretary. a. Principals, parents, and teachers can always call my office and get information from my secretary if I am attending a meeting or doing a school visit. b. My office secretary can type information for parent groups\nsend mail-outs to members of the Staffing Committee, etc.\nsummer school surveys\nand, other information to parents in the school community. c. The Federal Programs Director will be able to use his secretary on full-time basis. In addition to schools in the LRSD, the Federal Programs Office will be able to meet the needs of more than ten private schools and adhere to specific state and federal deadlines. d. The Desegregation Facilitator will not have to interrupt other district secretaries except in emergencies. At least one of the secretaries in another office have missed scheduled breaks and lunch to complete a task for me. This report today is no exception. 2. Focus Against Other secretaries who experienced budget cuts and want the position. Their confidence can be gained by allowing them to interview for the position and hire them if they meet the qualifications. BUSINESS CASE LRSD OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS MAY1993 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Little Rocle School District is faced with budget cuts for the 1993/94 year totaling more than 5 million. When given the choice, reducing positions rather than laying off has less adverse effect on employees. The maJor impact of cutting the position of Communications Assistant to part-time will be the necessity to transfer or delete some services that were in place with two full-time professionals in the office. Savings to the District will be $25,000 in salary, $600 travel stipend and $4,440 in benefits (Total $30,040.00) Current Situation Currently the LRSD Office of Communications is operating with one professional staff member and one secretary. The professional staff member, formerly the Communications Assistant for 1 1/2 years, is now functioning as Acting Director of Communications. The budget cut recommendation is to hire a part-time Communications Assistant at a salary of $10,000 with no travel stipend or benefits package. Background Information Prior to the Director's departure in February 1993, the office operated with the Director of Communications, a Communications Assistant, and a secretary. The Director was responsible for seeing that the office executed communications/marketing/public information strategies and supported the District's overall mission through improved community awareness, understanding and confidence. As part of those duties, the Director functioned as one of the two district spokespersons, was a member of the superintendent's cabinet, represented the District on two major boards, maintained a budget and directed the two other staff members in assigned tasks. As part of these tasks and supportive activities, the Communications Office has obligations it must meet pursuant to the \"Settlement Plan\" generally and specifically in the areas of public relations, incentive schools, focused activities, parent and community involvement and staff. Task areas include media relations, communications planning, crisis communication planning/ training, community /business relations, marketing and recruiting support for various schools detailed by the desegregation plan, development of support materials, such as brochures, videos, etc.\nmanaging the District's cable public access channel (Cable Channel 4), providing information to student households, school-community communications and staff communications. Business Case Office of Communications Page2 The Communications Assistant developed and executed programs for internal and external constituencies. The assistant kept records and developed various reports for the communications office, as well as the superintendent's office. Many of these reports supported items addressed in the desegregation plan. The assistant also planned and executed special events, developed written and video materials, directed school-community communications arid prepared various scripts for the superintendent. The secretary assisted in addressing external/internal requests that average more than 90 per month, media requests averaging more than 30 per month, internal requests for computer support, event planning, bulk mailings, preparation of superintendent citations, and general secretarial duties. College level interns have been used in the past when available. This practice will be continued. Problem Definition and Considerations The current financial status in which the LRSD finds itself, has forced the District to carefully consider budget cuts of all kinds. Everyone understands that the District cannot, by law, operate with a deficit. More than 7.5 million dollars must be cut from the budget. However, the community, as well as the administration, believes that those cuts should be made as far away from the students as possible, affecting the desegregation plan as little as possible. The reduction of professional staff has been considered whenever possible, hence, the recommendation to fill the position of Communications Assistant on a part-time basis. Alternatives As in all budget decisions, management has been sensitive to employees and the loss of their jobs, but cuts must be made. Alternatives for making the decision to make the Communications Assistant's position part-time include: 1. Restructure the department duties and hire an assistant with less experience at almost half the current salary. The assistant could be trained to assume many of the duties that have been returned to the school level, been assumed by the acting director or fallen by the wayside. 2. Leave the position at its current salary and hire a more experienced professional. 3. Do nothing-- do not rehire or restructure. Business Case Office of Communications Page3 4. Do not rehire and begin restructuring the office duties. 5. Hire a part-time Communications Assistant. Analysis of Alternatives 1. Restructuring the department and hiring an assistant at less salary would allow programs and activities that have been put in place to continue. Many of the programs and activities are directly and indirectly mentioned in the desegregation plan. Others duties that have been done by the assistant in the past but have been put on \"hold\" due to the lack of manpower, address the issue of record keeping and reporting which are important in providing materials for monitoring. The impact of the staff reduction has greatly reduced the productivity of the two staff members that remain. Basically the work load of the one vacated staff member has been divided as following: 85% to the remaining professional and 15% to the secretary. There has been minimal restructuring at this time. By hiring another assistant with less experience the restructured work load could be more evenly distributed among the three staff members. The hiring would also more closely align the Communications Office with the recommendations of the Interdistrict Desegregation Plan where it states that all three districts should \"augment\" the communications staffs. The financial savings would be approximately one-half the salary or $18,000. This alternative was rejected because it did not save the District sufficient money. 2. Leaving the position as it is would provide two staff members of a professional level to continue programs and supportive activities as obligated in the desegregation plan. With this alternative there would be no financial savings to the District (loss of $40,040). This alternative was rejected because it was a continuing level budget and would not meet the reduction requirements. 3. The decision to not rehire or restructre would make the office almost impossible to run. Minimal restructuring has begun in order to make the office duties somewhat manageable for the two remaining staff members. The financial savings would be that of $40,040). This alternative was rejected because although the District would save money, the chances of the desegregation plan being implemented would be slim. 4. The decision to not rehire, but instead restructure the office duties to reduce the work load would allow the staff to continue some of the programs and activities. Many of the programs developed and executed by the Communications Office in the past will be managed at the school level as a way Business Case Office of Communications Page4 of addressing the requirements of the desegregation plan. Others will be evaluated and restructured or dropped. The restructuring of the office will allow the staff to realign their duties to compensate for the reduction by placing the duties at the school level. The restructuring will be accomplished in such a way as to avoid an adverse effect on the implementation of the desegregation plan. This alternative is recommended. 5. Hire a part-time Communications Assistant to releive some of the work load and still save the District money. In addition, the Office of Communications will need to enter into a support services contract for services that may no longer be produced internally. These services may include copy writing, typesetting and printing production of written materials, graphic computer support, marketing and recruiting support and event planning. Suggested salary would be $10,000 without benefits. Recommendation The decision to hire a part-time Communications Assistant would allow many of the projects in place to be continued. It would help take the pressure off of the schools to be responsible fo thier own promotion. It would also allow the Communications Office to be more in line with the Interdistrict Desegregation Plan recommendations. This decision would save the District more than $30,000. The alternative is recommended. Objective The objective/ goal is to make budget cuts with as little direct effect on the children/ students of the District without affecting programs and the desegregation plan. This recommendation supports the goal listed above and would be a budget cut that is rather far from students. It cuts the salary and benefits of one position saving the District $30,040. It does not directly affect the education of children. Evaluation of the budget cut will be made by the superintendent, ODM and the Court. The superintendent will assess the office on its capability to support communications/marketing/public relations aspects of education and the ability to support the District in its overall mission through improved community awareness, understanding and confidence. ODM and the Court will monitor the effectiveness of the office in fulfilling the implementation of the desegregation plan. Business Case Office of Communications Pages Expected Benefits Expected benefits are a budget reduction of $30,040. The community will benefit if the District can balance the budget and not be forced to depend on additional taxation. The District will gain public support and confidence in their word by becoming fiscally responsible.  Impact Analysis Desegregation Plan Impact The effects of reduction in personnel will be most noticeable in reduced services to schools, internal staff and the community. Services may no longer be feasible at the level they have been offered, may need to be restructured and moved to another area of responsibility, or may be deleted. Services that are currently being offered that are ex ected to continue are listed below with references to the public relations and incentive school promotion section of the desegregation plan. 1. Innovative ways to disseminate public information (Pg. 62, 63) 2. Brochures (externally produced,) fliers, annual school calendar, PSAs, weekly news releases, and news conferences when appropriate. (Pg 62) 3. School/ administration network to assure accurate and ongoing flow of information. (Pg. 63) 4. Outreach to community - Realtors, key community leaders, Chamber of Commerce, opinion makers, business leaders and others. (Pg. 63, 64) 5. Recognition and reward of achievement for employees, students and parents. (Pg. 64, 7) 6. Continuation of community and internal forums with the Superintendent and administration to gain input for future planning. (Pg. 65, 66, 67) 7. Strengthening the link with business community by promoting the activities of VIPS, the Chamber of Commerce and others who assist us in helping the community to understand the desegregation plan. (Pg. 67) Business Case Office of Communications Page6 8. Assist the SAO in recruiting for all schools as well as aggressive marketing efforts for specific schools such as King and Stephens schools. 9. Continue to assist in recruitment for incentive schools. (Pg. 215, 216) In addition to the services listed above, day to day office operation requires addressing external/internal inquires averaging 90 per month, media requests averaging 30 per month, superintendent's office support in gathering information for script/ citation preparation, internal requests for computer support, event planning such as the District retirement party, National Merit Scholar reception and teacher/ staff appreciation and many more unexpected requests. In addition there are several unknowns that must be factored into the workload for recruiting support for King and Stephens Interdistrict Schools in 1993/94. The following areas are expected to feel the cuts more intensely, be moved to another area of responsibility, or be deleted: School level 1. Management, execution and evaluation of external media requests and programs to present LRSD schools and students in a positive tone (Pg. 62, 2) 2. Training of secretarial and other staff to be ambassadors on behalf of the schools and the desegregation plan (Pg. 64, 8) 3. Preparation of a public relations resource handbook (Pg. 65, d) 4. Internal production of recruitment brochures and other promotional literature (Pg. 62, 3) 5. Internal production of a LRSD newsletter for all staff (Pg. 63, Sd) Community level 1. External production of a LRSD newsletter for the community (Pg. 62, 3, pg. 67, 12) 2. Further development of forms of communication with public who are hard to reach through routine methods (Pg. 63, 4) Business Case Office of Communications Page7 3. Further development of ways to insure that business leaders understand the desegregation plan terminology and programs. (Pg. 67, 11 c) 4. Development of a business-community based speakers bureau (Pg. 67, 11 c) 5. Development of programming for LRSD's Cable Channel 4. (Pg. 62, 63) Court Orders The effect this reduction would have on court orders is unknown at this time. However, concerns about the District's recruiting and support for that effort have been expressed in recent court hearings. Concerns about internal and external communications in providing staff and the public with educational information about the desegregation plan have also been expressed. Political Factors Politically the District would benefit from a balanced budget, public support and confidence gained by becoming fiscally responsible and meeting one of the goals in making cuts as far away from children as possible. Risks Risks in making this cut include the problems that may arise if one or both staff members become ill or are on leave for an extended period, or find other employment. Risks might also occur in not being able to implement all items in the desegregation plan even with the restructuring of the department. Dispersing the duties to others who may or may not be trained properly may be risky. Education is most important at the school level, as it should be. When given the choice, schools may set priorities that do not include requests for good public relations in their schools at the top of their list. These actions, when monitored by the court, could place the District at risk. Timing Budget cuts IDYS.t be made for the coming year. The position is unfilled at this point and presents an opportunity to make a cut without the loss of an employee's job. Business Case Office of Communications Page8 General Implementation Plan Task Responsibility When Identification of Communications Ongoing responsibilities to be restructured Recommendations for Communications Ongoing/ restructuring of as needed responsibilities Identification of Communications/ June 1993/ print projects to be done externally Student Assignment Ongoing Recommendation for Communications July 1993 who will do staff training and resource book Recommendation for who Communications August 1993 will produce newsletters Development of forms of Communications August 1993 communication/ restructure Development of community Communications August 1993 understanding/restructure Development of community- Communications Sept. 1993 based speakers bureau/ restructure Development of programming Communications Oct. 1993 for Cable 4 HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR Executive Summary The Human Resources Department was combined with the Labor Relations Department during the 1992-93 school year, and the position of Human Resources Director was eliminated. The consolidation of these two departments has been unsuccessful, causing departmental operations to further deteriorate and impact school operations. Therefore, it is essential that the position of Human Resources Director be filled immediately. A. B. C. D. E. Background The merger of Human Resources and Labor Relations resulted in the elimination of one cabinet level administrative position. The consolidation of these two departments has been unsuccessful. Problem Definition fe,2\n1411-uA ~r f'~_? The Human Resources Department continues to have difficulty accomplishing the department's organizational objectives. The result of this department's inability to operate in an efficient manner is impacting school operations. Analysis of Alternatives ~~~~1 There appears to be only two viable alternatives, namely\n(1) hire a Human Resources Director, or (2) subcontract this department's operations to a private company. The alternative to recruit a professional Human Resources Director appears to be the best short-run alternative. Recommendation Recruit and hire a Human Resources Director. The total cost including salary and benefits is $55,000. Objective -7~, The objective of this recommendation is to improve the Human Resources Department operations as well as improve school support. PROGRAM ANALYSIS for the ADDITION OF THE ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The five high schools within the Little Rock School District are faced with a multitude of challenges each day to keep teaching and learning a top- priority. The administrative teams have tremendous responsibilities in trying to meet the needs of all students, staff, and parents. A B. Background The current number of teachers, administrative teams, and each school are as follows: studentenrollo/ SCHOOL TEACHERS ADMINISTRATORS ,/It SIUDENT ENROILMENT T Parkview 73 4 18,'Z.S 10-1-92 871 ,,., 4-13-93 823 11.3 McClellan 78 4 l'I,~ 10-1-92 985 ,z., 4-13-93 916 ,,.1 Hall 83 4 z~.7~ 10-1-92 994 //, 1 4-13-93 978 ,,.g Fair 67 4 ,~.7~ 10-1-92 905 ,r .c 4-13-93 855 Central 115 4 7.g,11 10-1-92 1,991 \" 4-13-93 1,867 \" Problem DefinitiQn Central High, with a student population of close to 2,000, needs an additional assistant principal to meet the demands of the daily school operation. The school has been able to function with the number of administrators currently assigned there, but it has been most stressful and difficult. ~ RRnt\u0026gt;S -.4 z,7.8 zoG z#.,3 zz, Z,l'J.5 t.'l'I-'\u0026gt; iZL.3 C. Alternatives ,fJ . I. VU~~ tH\"d ~ ~- ~!'~~ F~: The alternatives are limited in this situation. The decision fo add one additional administrator should be based on an appropriate justification for the need at Central High School. Business Case Addition of the Assistant Principal Page 2 D. E. F. G. H. Recommendation It is recommended that one additional assistant principal be added to the Central High administrative team for the 1993-94 school year. Objective The addition of this position will greatly reduce the individual workload on all the administrators. With over 115 teachers to supervise and evaluate, an additional administrator will significantly make a difference. Students will benefit from this recommendation because one additional administrator will be available to assist with campus supervision, discipline issues, and the coordination of student activities. In addition, parents wuld have one more administrator available to them to address issues and concerns. Impact This recommendation will undoubtedly help the Central High staff to implement the Desegregation Plan more effectively and efficiently. Resources Analysis The addition of one assistant principal to Central High School will cost approximately $40,000. Force Field Analysis The Central High School staff and community will most likely support this recommendation. Forces against the recommendation would include individuals who are opposed to administrative positions being added, while other non-administrative positions have been eliminated or reduced. BUSINESS CASE: KUAR/KLRE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Little Rock School District currently supports a local public radio station. The amount expended for this support is approximately $86,000 per year. The District has come to question this support because of the financial crisis it currently finds itself in. In order to discontinue the support the District must give the radio station two years notice. The following information discusses the radio station situation in greater detail. It is recommended that the School District give the radio station the required two years notice so that resources may be more directly focused on District goals in the future. BACKGROUND: 1. Current Situation: The Little Rock School District has had an agreement with KUAR/KLRE, the local public radio station. This agreement has resulted in the station running public service announcements and giving other forms of support to the District. The station was helpful during the last millage and has provided some opportunities for students to experience radio production over the years. The District is currently paying $86,000 per year to support the station and must give two years notice if the agreement between it and the station is to be severed. This means that the station will have two years to find a source of funds to replace those furnished by the District. 2. Background Information: The District has supported the radio station over the years but has now reached a financial situation that has made continued support subject to question because of the necessity of the District to focus funds on teaching and learning activities and implementation of the Desegregation Plan. PROBLEM DEFINITION: 1. Problem Statement: The District is currently spending $86,000 per year to support the station. It can no longer afford to do this because the money could be spent on activities which are more closely aligned with District goals. 2. Considerations: The radio station has a large number of listeners who feel that the District should continue to support the station for a variety of reasons including enhanced public relations, assistance with recruiting and help with future millages. ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES: 1. Process: Discussions have been held with personnel from the radio station but the station has not yet reported alternatives to replace the funds if the District withdraws its support. 2. Identification: Alternatives to the severing of the contract could include the furnishing of support at a reduced level or the station finding funds from another source. 3. Analysis: Reduced levels of support from the District could lend some assistance to the station, but the question of whether the District really has any business supporting a public radio station would remain. The option of reduced levels of support is rejected at this time because the action contemplated is simply that of giving two years notice on the agreement with the station. This time span will give personnel from the station two years to find alternatives. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Action Recommended: It is recommended that the District give notice to KUAR/KLRE so that the contract with the station will be severed after two years. 2. Rationale: Support for a public radio station is inconsistent with the primary purposes of the District. Resources must be focused on activities that directly impact the classroom. This need is increasingly acute as resources continue to decline. OBJECTIVE: 1. Objective of the Recommendation: The District will begin to save over $86,000 per year at the end of the two year notice period. 2. Goal Support: The most important two goals of the District are to increase student learning and to implement the Desegregation Plan. The funds realized from withdrawing of support from the station will be used to support these two goals. IMPACT ANALYSIS: 1 . Program: Little impact on other programs is expected. 2. Desegregation Plan: Little impact on the Desegregation Plan is expected. 3. Court Orders: No Court Orders will be affected by this recommendation. 4. Political Factors: The radio station has a great deal of support from various segments of the community. These persons will exert pressure to maintain funding for the station. Other members of the community, and parents question why the District is spending money on a radio station. 5. Risks: The School District could lose support for future millages or other programs because supporters of the station are criticial of the withdrawal of funding. The District could also be accused by parents and non listeners of wasting money on activities which take money away from the classroom if the two years notice required by the contract is not given. 6. Timing: Timing for this decision is very good because the District is currently in a financial crisis which may worsen. This makes the giving of two years notice very important if future budget flexibility is to be maintained. BUSINESS CASE FOR PERSONNEL REDUCTIONS HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Reductions in personnel are necessary for the District to balance the budget for the 1993-94 school year. Each cabinet level administrator has been asked to make recommendations to reduce personnel in areas they supervise. The Human Resources Department (HR) has been asked to explore the possibility of reducing one secretarial position to assist in the effort to balance the budget. The secretarial duties of the position can be absorbed by the remaining secretarial staff with minimal impact to the District. The recommended reduction would save the District approximately $21,800 for the 1993-94 school year. However, the action by the Board of Directors must occur in time to notify the employee before June 1, 1993. Although restructuring of duties must take place with the remaining staff, it is possible to implement the recommendations. A BACKGROUND: Currently, the Human Resources Department (HR) has a staff consisting of a Director, a Recruiting Specialist, an Administrative Assistant and ten (10) secretaries. This staffing level is the result of the consolidation of the Labor Relations Department and Human Resources beginning in the 1992-93 school Year. The merger of the two departments was a budget reduction decision and allowed the elimination of one cabinet level administrative position (Director of Labor Relations). Additional needs for budget reductions to balance the 1993-94 budget have caused the District to further examine possible staff reductions for budgetary reasons. To meet that end, HR has been asked to reduce one secretarial position. B. PROBLEM DEFINITION: Given that additional budget reductions must be made in HR, the Problem is to decide which personnel cuts can be made and minimize the impact on the department's ability to accomplish its essential functions. C. ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES: The alternatives were limited by the actual staff size, administrative and secretarial, and by the seniority of the respective members of the staff assigned to HR. In determining if it could be possible to make cuts .other than personnel from the HR budget as an alternative recommendation to staff cuts, it must be understood that the entire operating budget for HR is currently $37,120 excluding salaries. For the 1993-94 school year, the budgeted amount has been reduced by 2 7 % to $27,120. The total non-salary budget for 1993-94 is almost the same as the salary of one secretarial position\ntherefore, a significant reduction in the HR non-salary budget would not be feasible. Since there are only two administrative positions in HR (Director and Recruiting Specialist) the only logical alternative has to be the Recruiting Specialist position. A school district with approximately 4000 employees cannot be expected to function with no director of HR for an extended period. After careful consideration, it has been determined that the recruiting function must remain a high priority with the District, and it is highly desirable for those functions to be coordinated by the Recruiting Specialist. On the secretarial reduction for HR, the selection of the person to be reduced will be decided by seniority with the duties assigned to that position to be distributed between the remaining secretarial staff. D. RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on the analysis of the available alternatives, the following recommendations are made: 1. One secretarial position assigned to HR should be eliminated. The rationale for the recommendation which has been presented is based solely on the analysis of the very limited alternatives. Reductions of personnel in HR represent the only significant monetary savings. The one position being recommended represents the least impact on HR's ability to complete its essential functions. E. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this recommendation is to reduce administrative expenses of the District to aid in the development of a balanced budget for the 1993-94 school year. The reduction of the secretarial position will assist in that effort by approximately $21,800. F. IMPACT ANALYSIS: secretary Program: The responsibilities of one of the s.ecretaries in HR will be absorbed by the remaining secretarial staff. Restructuring of responsibilities of the staff will be implemented to ensure minimal negative impact. Desegregation Plan: This reduction will not impact the plan. Court Orders: This reduction will not impact any court orders. Political Factors: There do not appear to be any political factors associated with this recommendation. Risks: The risk is that the remaining clerical staff will be stretched too thin and the delivery of services could be slowed. Timing: There are no timing problems associated with this recommendation. G. RESOURCES ANALYSIS: PERSONNEL ANALYSIS: This recommendation eliminates one position. The secretarial reduction would result in the transfer of one secretary unless a vacancy occurs as the result of a resignation or retirement. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS: The recommendation will have a first year savings of approximately $21,800. Assuming only an increment increase (approximately 3%) for the next five years, the savings to the District would be as follows: 1993-94 - $21,800 1994-95 - $22,454 1995-96 - $23,128 1996-97 - $23,821 1997-98 - $24,536 H. GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN: If the recommended personnel reduction is approved by the Board of Directors, the secretary will be transferred effective July 1, 1993. This notification will be made by the Director of Human Resources. BUSINESS CASE LRSD OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS MAY1993 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Little Rock School District is faced with budget cuts for the 1993/94 year totaling more than 5 million. Reducing positions has less adverse effect on employees. The major impact of cutting the position of Communications Assistant will be the necessity to transfer or delete services. Savings to the District will be $35,000 in salary, $600 travel stipend and $4,440 in benefits (Total $40,040.00) Current Situation Currently the LRSD Office of Communications is operating with one professional staff member and one secretary. The professional staff member, formerly the Communications Assistant for 11/2 years, is now functioning as Acting Director of Communications. The budget cut recommendation is to continue running the department with the reduced staff of two. Background Information Prior to the Director's departure in February 1993, the office operated with the Director of Communications, a Communications Assistant, and a secretary. The Director was responsible for seeing that the office executed communications/marketing/public information strategies and supported the District's overall mission through improved community awareness, understanding and confidence. As part of those duties, the Director functioned as one of the two district spokespersons, was a member of the superintendent's cabinet, represented the District on two major boards, maintained a budget and directed the two other staff members in assigned tasks. As part of these tasks and supportive activities, the Communications Office has obligations it must meet pursuant to the \"Settlement Plan\" generally and specifically in the areas of public relations, incentive schools, focused activities, parent and community involvement and staff. Task areas include media relations, communications planning, crisis communication planning/ training, community /business relations, marketing and recruiting support for various schools detailed by the desegregation plan, development of support materials, such as brochures, videos, etc.\nmanaging the District's cable public access channel (Cable Channel 4), providing information to student households, school-community communications and staff communications. The Communications Assistant developed and executed programs for internal and external constituencies. The assistant kept records and developed various reports for the communications office, as well as the superintendent's Business Case Office of Communications office. Many of these reports supported items addressed in the desegregation plan. The assistant also planned and executed special events, developed written and video materials, directed school-community communications and prepared various scripts for the superintendent. The secretary assisted in addressing external/internal requests that average more than 90 per month, media requests averaging more than 30 per month, internal requests for computer support, event planning, bulk mailings, preparation of superintendent citations, and general secretarial duties. College level interns have been used in the past when available. This practice will be continued. Problem Definition and Considerations The current financial status in which the LRSD finds itself, has forced the District to carefully consider budget cuts of all kinds. Everyone understands that the District cannot, by law, operate with a deficit. More than 7.5 million dollars must be cut from the budget. However, the community, as well as the administration, believes that those cuts should be made as far away from the students as possible, affecting the desegregation plan as little as possible. The reduction of professional staff has been considered whenever possible, hence, the recommendation not to fill the position of Communications Assistant. ..Alternatives As in all budget decisions, management has been sensitive to employees and the loss of their jobs but cuts must be made. Alternatives for making the decision to cut the Communications Assistant's position include: 1. Restructure the department duties and hire an assistant with less experience at almost half the current salary. The assistant could be trained to assume many of the duties that have been returned to the school level, been assumed by the acting director or fallen by the wayside. 2. Leave the position at its current salary and hire a more experienced professional. 3. Do nothing -- do not rehire or restructure. 4. Do not rehire and begin restructuring the office duties. Business Case Office of Communications Analysis of Alternatives 1. Restructuring the department and hiring an assistant at less salary would allow programs and activities that have been put in place to continue. Many of the programs and activities are directly and indirectly mentioned in the desegregation plan. Others duties that have been done by the assistant in the past but have been put on \"hold\" due to the lack of manpower, address the issue of record keeping and reporting which are important in providing materials for monitoring. The impact of the staff reduction has greatly reduced the productivity of the two staff members that remain. Basically the work load of the one vacated staff member has been divided as following: 85% to the remaining professional and 15% to the secretary. There has been minimal restructuring at this time. By hiring another assistant with less experience the restructured work load could be more evenly distributed among the three staff members. The financial savings would be approximately one-half the salary or $18,000. This alternative was rejected because it did not save the District sufficient money. 2. Leaving the position as it is would provide two staff members of a professional level to continue programs and supportive activities as obligated in the desegregation plan. With this alternative there would be no financial savings to the District (loss of $40,040). This alternative was rejected because it was a continuing level budget and would not meet the reduction requirements. 3. The decision to not rehire or restructure would make the office almost impossible to run. Minimal restructuring has begun in order to make the office duties somewhat manageable for the two remaining staff members. The financial savings would be that of $40,040). This alternative was rejected because although the District would save money, the chances of the desegregation plan being implemented would be slim. Recommendation 4. The decision to not rehire, but instead restructure the office duties to reduce the work load would allow the staff to continue some of the programs and activities. Many of the programs developed and executed by the Communications Office in the past will be managed at the school level as a way of addressing the requirements of the desegregation plan. Others will be evaluated and restructured or dropped. The restructuring of the office will allow the staff to realign their duties to compensate for the reduction by placing the duties at the school level. The restructuring will be accomplished in such a way Business Case Office of Communications as to avoid an adverse effect on the implementation of the desegregation plan. This alternative is recommended. Objective The objective/ goal is to make budget cuts with as little direct effect on the children/ students of the District without affecting programs and the desegregation plan. This recommendation supports the goal listed above and would be a budget cut that is rather far from students. It cuts the salary and benefits of one position saving the District $40,040. It does not directly affect the education of children. Evaluation of the budget cut will be made by the superintendent, ODM and the Court. The superintendent will assess the office on its capability to support communications/marketing/public relations aspects of education and the ability to support the District in its overall mission through improved community awareness, understanding and confidence. ODM and the Court will monitor the effectiveness of the office in fulfilling the implementation of the desegregation plan. Expected Benefits Expected benefits are a budget reduction of $40,040. The community will benefit if the District can balance the budget and not be forced to depend on additional taxation. The District will gain public support and confidence in their word by becoming fiscally responsible. Impact Analysis Desegregation Plan Impact The effects of reduction in personnel will be most noticeable in reduced services to schools, internal staff and the community. Services may no longer be feasible at the level they have been offered, may need to be restructured and moved to another area of responsibility, or may be deleted. Services that are currently being offered that are expected to continue are listed below with references to the public relations and incentive school promotion section of the desegregation plan. Business Case Office of Communications 1. Innovative ways to disseminate public information (Pg. 62, 63) 2. Brochures (externally produced,) fliers, annual school calendar, PSAs, weekly news releases, and news conferences when appropriate. (Pg 62) 3. School/ administration network to assure accurate and ongoing flow of information. (Pg. 63) 4. Outreach to community - Realtors, key community leaders, Chamber of Commerce, opinion makers, business leaders and others. (Pg. 63, 64) 5. Recognition and reward of achievement for employees, students and parents. (Pg. 64, 7) 6. Continuation of community and internal forums with the Superintendent and administration to gain input for future planning. (Pg. 65, 66, 67) 7. Strengthening the link with business community by promoting the activities of VIPS, the Chamber of Commerce and others who assist us in helping the community to understand the desegregation plan. (Pg. 67) 8. Assist the SAO in recruiting for all schools as well as aggressive marketing efforts for specific schools such as King and Stephens schools. 9. Continue to assist in recruitment for incentive schools. (Pg. 215, 216) In addition to the services listed above, day to day office operation requires addressing external/internal inquires averaging 90 per month, media requests averaging 30 per month, superintendent's office support in gathering information for script/ citation preparation, internal requests for computer support, event planning such as the District retirement party, National Merit Scholar reception and teacher/ staff appreciation and many more unexpected requests. In addition there are several unknowns that must be factored into the workload for recruiting support for King and Stephens Interdistrict Schools in 1993/94. The following areas are expected to feel the cuts more intensely, be moved to another area of responsibility, or be deleted: Business Case Office of Communications School level 1. Management, execution and evaluation of external media requests and programs to present LRSD schools and students in a positive tone (Pg. 62, 2) 2. Training of secretarial and other staff to be ambassadors on behalf of the schools and the desegregation plan (Pg. 64, 8) 3. Preparation of a public relations resource handbook (Pg. 65, d) 4. Internal production of recruitment brochures and other promotional literature (Pg. 62, 3) 5. Internal production of a LRSD newsletter for all staff (Pg. 63, 5d) Community level 1. External production of a LRSD newsletter for the community (Pg. 62, 3, pg. 67, 12) 2. Further development of forms of communication with public who are hard to reach through routine methods (Pg. 63, 4) 3. Further development of ways to insure that business leaders understand the desegregation plan terminology and programs. (Pg. 67, 11 c) 4. Development of a business-community based speakers bureau (Pg. 67, 11 c) 5. Development of programming for LRSD's Cable Channel 4. (Pg. 62, 63) Court Orders The effect this reduction would have on court orders is unknown at this time. However, concerns about the District's recruiting and support for that effort have been expressed in recent court hearings. Concerns about internal and external communications in providing staff and the public with educational information about the desegregation plan have also been expressed. Business Case Office of Communications Political Factors Politically the District would benefit from a balanced budget, public support and confidence gained by becoming fiscally responsible and meeting one of the goals in making cuts as far away from children as possible. Risks in making this cut include the problems that may arise if one or both staff members become ill or are on leave for an extended period, or find other employment. Risks might also occur in not being able to implement all items in the desegregation plan even with the restructuring of the department. Dispersing the duties to others who may or may not be trained properly may be risky. Education is most important at the school level, as it should be. When given the choice, schools may set priorities that do not include requests for good public relations in their schools at the top of their list. These actions, when monitored by the court, could place the District at risk. Timing Budget cuts nms1 be made for the coming year. The position is unfilled at this point and presents an opportunity to make a cut without the loss of an employee's job . .General Implementation Plan Task Identification of responsibilities to be restructured Recommendations for restructuring of responsibilities Identification of print projects to be done externally Responsibility Communications Communications Communications/ Student Assignment When Ongoing Ongoing/ as needed June 1993 Business Case Office of Communications Recommendation for Communications June 1993 who will do staff training and resource book Recommendation for who Communications July 1993 will produce newsletters Development of forms of Communications July 1993 communication/ restructure Development of community Communications August 1993 understanding/ restructure Development of community- Communications August 1993 based speakers bureau/ restructure Development of programming Communications Sept. 1993 for Cable 4 BUSINESS CASE CURRICULUM AND LEARNING IMPROVEMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Little Rock School District is committed to a comprehensive desegregation plan which focuses on the total learning environment for all students. The method of assigning these students is the first step in creating school and classroom environments that foster academic achievement and improve race relations between students and staff members. The next step involves a commitment to quality desegregated education by the District, the parents, and the community. The commitment requires a plan of action predicated upon the District's commitment to remaining solvent, while providing quality desegregated education for its students. To remain solvent requires the District to reduce its budget by nine million dollars and to begin operating effective schools with the funds that are generated on an annual basis. In an effort to contribute to the necessary budget reductions, Curriculum and Learning Improvement proposes reductions in the areas of computer lab attendants, media clerks, secretaries, and academic support math teachers. As a result of these reductions, the District will need to equitably distribute staff through restructuring of computer labs, media and secretarial services, and the Academic Support Program. A BACKGROUND Little Rock School District continues to cope with many of the problems that are unique ~o urban school districts, including safety and security, urban flight, racial issues, financial ~ssues, aging buildings, and political interest groups. It has also been involved in implementing an extremely comprehensive and detailed desegregation plan and initiating major construction projects. The severity of the financial problems has caused the District to focus primarily on \"keeping the doors open rather than teaching and learning.\" The District desperately needs to reduce expenditures significantly in order to have a balanced budget for the 1993-94 school year and to discontinue deficit spending. The Di trict must operate an efficient school district within the boundaries of the revenues it receives on an annual basis. Prior to the 1989-90 school year, the previous administration and Board of Directors had developed desegregation plans and negotiated a financial settlement with the State of Arkansas. Two essential issues regarding the settlement must be understood. First, all ?long, the parties knew that the financial settlement would not be sufficient to implement the desegregation plan and that local dollars would be required to fully fund the plan. No one knew how many local dollars would be required to support the settlement money to pay for this plan. The second issue is the commitment to \"double fund\" the original six racially identifiable incentive schools. At the time the settlement was reached, \"double funding\" was not clearly defined nor had the cost for implementing the plan been determined. Over the years the District has negotiated salaries and benefits with several employee groups and obligated funds without knowing the exact amount it could expect to receive from its tax supported resources The student enrollment has declined for a period of years, yet the number of District employees has increased on a regular basis. The District has continued to add programs, such as computer-assisted instruction and media clerks, but has not deleted any programs. The District usually fully implements programs rather than \"piloting or phasing-in\" programs in an orderly and financially responsible manner. Until recently it has been unsuccessful in passing a millage. The District has attempted to resolve or reduce the financial problems through a process called budget recovery, passage of an eight-mill tax increase, budget reduction of 5.5 million dollars in July, 1990, busing settlement proceeds, and an approximately ten million dollar budget reduction in July, 1992. These short-term resolutions only delayed the financial crisis that we now face. B. PROBLEM DEFINITION The Department of Curriculum and Learning Improvement must assist the District in resolving its financial problems. Over the years major cuts--personnel and materials/supplies--have been made in this department. The budget reduction process escalated our timeline as we evaluated how we use time and other resources, such as technology and staff, differently and more meaningfully. Given these circumstances, it appears that we can reduce the number of computer lab attendants and media clerks in :he District as technology, used appropriately, has the potential for facilitating a decrease in staff. All schools and the community will be impacted by various degrees. The computer labs are used as a recruitment tool by the area schools, and computer attendants provide computer assisted instruction to all students. The computer attendants have been trained to provide these services, while some classroom teachers are not trained and may not be comfortable providing this instruction. The community, however, values these computer !abs. Issues, such as these, can cause the community to view the District as unstable and insensitive to its needs. !ime spent seeking additional revenues through budget reductions is negatively 1~pacting teaching and learning. Media clerks assist the librarians by keeping the libraries open and supervising students doing independent research and checking out books while the librarian is teaching. They also provide clerical assistance in ordering and processing materials. Library clerks will continue to perform these duties, but time can be more effectively used with the development and use of curriculum resource guides. C. ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES The Department of Curriculum and Learning Improvement has been impacted by every budget cut down through the years. Very few options remain if we are to continue to support the schools. Now the Department must determine the most effective means of implementing the newly-proposed budget cuts. Consideration was first given to eliminating all of the computer attendants and to reducing the number of hours that our media clerks work. Consideration was also given to using more of the Desegregation Loan. Concerns were raised regarding the impact this action would have on the community and the schools. Discussions were held with curriculum supervisors, cabinet members, some principals, and representatives from the Arkansas Department of Education. Support was evident. There is a strong commitment to recruit white students to desegregate our schools. Other alternatives were also reviewed, such as cutting teacher positions, closing several small schools, shortening the school year, asking for another millage increase, imposing a five percent (5%) cut across the board, or eliminating library clerks. Student registration for the 1993-94 school year has not been completed, and it would be premature to consider reducing the number of teachers. Presently, there is not enough community support to pass another millage. The process for closing schools is very detailed and it is too late to begin the process for the 1993-94 school year. The reduction of school days would cause the District an accreditation violation or loss of accreditation. A five percent (5%) reduction across the board for all departments may not provide enough revenue to cover our projected deficits. D. RECOMMENDATIONS Following several meetings with curriculum supervisors and central office staff, recommendations are listed below for your consideration. 1. Computer Lab Attendants and Media Clerks: It is recommended that the District eliminate twenty (20) computer lab attendants and twenty-one (21) media clerks in order to reduce the budget deficit. 2. Curriculum Secretaries: It is recommended that through secretarial pooling, the District eliminate four ( 4) positions. 3. Instructional Resource Center: It is recommended that the District reinstate one position in Instructional Technology. One secretary has been eliminated from this department. The technologist will assume some of these duties and assist other supervisors who are located at the IRC. 4. Academic Support Math Teachers: It is recommended that the District eliminate the pull-out program for math in grades 1-3. This action would allow the District to reassign eight (8) teachers. Staff training would be provided to regular teachers to enhance their skills and to provide alternative instructional strategies. It is recommended that the District eliminate twenty (20) computer lab attendants and twenty-one (21) media clerks for the 1993-94 school year. Remaining computer attendants and media clerks will be scheduled into schools on an equitable basis as are music, art, and physical education teachers. (See attachment) The revised curriculum centers on student learning outcomes and is implemented District-wide. We are now able to make decisions that require us to use time and resources, such as technology and staff, differently and more meaningfully. The restructuring of computer-assisted instruction and media clerks will allow us to make the needed budget cuts and, at the same time, allow trained computer lab attendants to provide computer-assisted instruction. The number of library clerks will be reduced, but the remaining clerks will be able to provide services to librarians and the schools. A review of staffing for the computer labs and library clerks was beneficial. All schools except Washington were originally staffed with one (1) lab attendant. Little or no consideration was given to the student enrollment and staff assignments. This recommendation allows the District to continue to provide two 30-minute periods of computer instruction each week for students in grades 1-6. The computer labs will be staffed by trained computer lab attendants. Lab attendants may be assigned to provide services to more than one school. Computer labs will also be available to regular teachers, gifted specialists, etc., to further enhance learning for students, as well as to help them become more comfortable using the computers. Library clerks will be assigned to schools based on student enrollment and identifiable school needs. E. OBJECTIVE The objective of this recommendation is to allow the District to reduce the budget deficit a:s well as to minimally impact the integrity of the District's mission and desegregation plan. We can provide for more equitable distribution of staff. Consideration was given to providing quality computer services to our schools. Maintenance of this service by trained lab attendants will allow the schools to continue to use the computer labs as a recruitment tool. Additionally, this restructuring will allow wider and more comprehensive use of computers, with a greater focus and connection within and across school sites. The more computer-assisted instruction is aligned with the curriculum and used by all staff, the greater is our likelihood of increasing academic achievement for all students. We can, over a period of time, eliminate the need for teachers to stop teaching the curriculum in order to prepare students to pass a particular test. The revised curriculum contains resource guides which identify materials needed to support the teaching of the curriculum. This resource will assist in a more efficient use of media clerks' time. Evaluation Criteria Students in grades 1-6 will be scheduled for the same amount of time in the computer labs as in the 1992-93 school year. Staffing of computer labs will be based on need rather than across the board allocations. Teaching and learning will show greater focus and connection rather than teaching for the test. Increased student achievement should be noted. Increased use of computer labs and libraries by regular teachers should be noted. Media clerks will become more efficient in providing support. Student recruitment will not be negatively impacted by the modified scheduling of computer lab attendants. Students will continue to use the library but in a more meaningful way. Expected Benefits The District will be able to meet its commitment of increasing achievement for all students which will result in a reduction of the disparity between white and black students. As students matriculate through school, there will be positive gains over a three- to five-year period of time. There will be a closer connection between teaching in the classroom and the support provided by the media center. Staff will become less hesitant to use technology to assist in the delivery of daily instruction. The District will expend its funds in a more cost-saving manner which can result in the elimination of deficit spending. F. IMPACT ANALYSIS Basic computer-assisted instruction can be maintained for each school. Fewer lab attendants will be displaced. Staffing will be more equitable in all schools. The school year will not be reduced. Regular teachers will have options and time to become comfortable using computers. Schools will be able to use computer labs as a recruitment tool. Teaching and learning will be more meaningful and connected. All lab attendants will not have jobs. Some lab attendants will have to travel. Additional activities, such as assisting students attending the labs at times other than their prescribed times, will not be performed by lab attendants. Media services will be impacted, but with limited staff, most duties can be performed in a more meaningful manner. The desegregation plan will not be negatively impacted. This recommendation should have a positive impact on the plan. Court orders will be preserved as we have been ordered to make good use of all equipment and supplies that were purchased with desegregation funds. The restoration of most computer lab attendants and their services will provide for the community's needs. Failure to approve this recommendation will result in a need for the District to find $700,000 from some other source. It also prevents the District from dealing with the issue of \"overstaffing\" our schools. The risk of implementing the recommendation is minimal as the labs and media centers will be available for greater usage. It is possible that regular teachers may not take advantage of using the computer labs. Computer lab attendants and media clerks should be notified of their lack of employment thirty (30) days prior to the beginning of their 1993-94 reporting-to-work date. G. RESOURCES ANALYSIS The staffing for computer labs for the 1993-94 school year as compared to the 1992-93 school year is indicated (see attached chart). Training will be needed for regular teachers. This training will be ongoing and can be provided during the school day by using time allocated for faculty meetings. Additional training can be provided during the evenings at the new Instructional Resource Center (IRC) on a volunteer basis.  The District needs to develop a technology plan to determine its equipment needs. Such a plan will include library media equipment costs and proposals for assuming such costs. The existing hardware will be outmoded within the next two to three years. Most new and high-quality software cannot be used by the District due to the type of hardware we are currently using. Such hardware can be purchased from our bond account using a lease-purchase arrangement. Federal funds may also be used to purchase the needed software and limited hardware. Technology is currently available that will eliminate a number of services provided by media clerks. H. FORCE FIELD ANALYSIS The primary supporters of this recommendation will be central office staff, principals, some teachers, and community persons. This recommendation provides for the needs of students, teachers, some computer attendants/media clerks, and the community. Providing information to these forces will assist the District in reassuring patrons and others of our commitment. The primary detractors will be computer lab attendants and media clerks who will be displaced. We will need to assist the displaced persons in securing other employment. They should be dealt with in a very caring and professional manner. I. GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Date Activity Person(s) Responsible 5/93 Plan presented to Board Superintendent and of Directors for Assoc. Supt. for discussion Curriculum 5/27/93 Plan presented to Board Superintendent of Directors for approval 6/93 Staffing needs are Director of Human finalized Resources, Assoc. Supt. and Curr. Supervisors 6/93 Staff notified of Director of Human employment status Resources 6/93 Principals notified of Director of Human 1993-94 staffing Resources 8/93 Develop plans for use of Principals computers by other staff 8/93 Pre-school inservice\nCurriculum Supervisors media clerks/computer lab attendants report to work 8/93 Services provided to Computer lab schools attendants/media clerks 9/93 - 6/94 On-going monitoring of Principals and Curr. computer labs Supervisors 9/93 - 6/94 Quarterly status reports Principals and Curr. Supervisors 5/94 Annual evaluation of Principals, Teachers, computer-assisted and Curr. Supvs. instruction 6/94 Feedback used to Principals, Teachers, improve services and Curr. Supvs. It is recommended that the Department of Curriculum and Learning Improvement eliminate four ( 4) secretarial positions and that a secretarial pool be established at the IRC and Metropolitan Vocational-Technical Education Center to perform the needed services. It is recommended that the Department of Curriculum and Learning Improvement reinstate one position in Instructional Technology. The technologist will assume some of the responsibilities that were performed by the secretaries as well as assist other supervisors at the IRC. The rationale for these recommendations is that given our new location, we can now use remaining staff in a more responsive manner. The existing structure lends itself to make these changes with minimum impact on the schools and our departments. Reduction of the budget is the reason for making such cuts. E. OBJECTIVE The objective of these recommendations is to save money in the area of Curriculum and Learning Improvement. The reduction of the positions will help the District in stopping deficit spending, as well as beginning to staff departments in accordance with their delegated responsibilities. Responsibilities assigned to these staff members will allow the District to provide the needed support to the schools and curriculum departments. It will be necessary for staff to examine how time and responsibilities can become more efficient and effective. Technology such as computers and automated requisitioning should facilitate the smooth operation of these offices. Evaluation Criteria Ongoing monitoring of services to the schools and supervisors will indicate that quality services are being provided to staff.  Customer Satisfaction Surveys will be used near the end of the 1993-94 school year to determine our customer reactions to the reduction of staff. Information gathered through surveys and monitoring of programs will be used to improve services and/ or to recommend that the District consider restoring these positions. F. IMPACT ANALYSIS Each position has been reviewed in terms of assigned responsibilities, the impact on services to the schools, the desegregation plan, and political factors and risks for the District and the Department. The relocation of the IRC may allow the District to utilize a secretarial po_ol to provide the needed services for curriculum supervisors and our 52 schools (including King). All supervisors relocated are housed on one floor and the use of a secretarial pool could be effective and efficient. Prior to this spring, the technology department personnel were not housed with other curriculum supervisors. It is recommended that some of their duties be reassigned to other IRC staff. The remaining two secretaries at Metropolitan will assume the responsibilities and duties that are now performed by three secretaries. The physical location of the site as well as the reduction of grants will help this proposal to work. Desegregation Plan These positions are not identified in the desegregation plan. Some basic secretarial and technology responsibilities are in the plan. The plan does not indicate who will perform such services. The remaining staff will assume responsibilities. Court Orders No existing court orders should have a bearing on these recommendations. Political Factors The administration will be viewed as insensitive by some staff and community members when we discontinue the services of employees. The District should take measures to ensure a supportive and smooth transition for such employees. Risks The quality and level of services to schools and staff could be negatively impacted. Presently, staff is able to respond in a timely manner. The District must look for other alternatives in securing needed funding. Timing It is extremely important that affected staff know as soon as possible their employment status for the 1993-94 school year. G. RESOURCES ANALYSIS Provided is a chart that shows the existing staff and the proposed staffing assignments for the 1993-94 school year. Existing Curriculum Staff 1992-93 Content Area No. of Secretaries English/For. Lang./ESL Instruc. Tech/ Library Services Mathematics Reading Science Social Studies Staff Development Parent Advisory Comm. Early Childhood Educ. Vocational Education TOTAL Content Area Instructional Technology: Supervisor Technologists Total 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 .1--- 1* 0 3 13 1 3 4 Projected Curriculum Staff 1993-94 Content Area No. of Secretaries English/For. Lang./ESL Instruc. Tech/ Library Services Mathematics Reading Science Social Studies Staff Development Parent Advisory Comm. Early Childhood Educ. Vocational Education Content Area Instructional Technology: Supervisor Technologists POOL II II II II II 1* POOL 2 9 1 3 4 * The District assumes financial responsibility for all positions except the secretary for our Parent Advisory Committee which is funded by Chapters 1 and 2. Cost savings should be maintained each year after this budget reduction . H. FORCE FIELD ANALYSIS The primary supporters of this recommendation will be the administration, some schools, staff, and various facets of our community. These persons recognize that the District must make these budget reductions. The cuts will be made without significantly impacting the schools. Providing information and keeping the lines of communication open will help us to gain additional support. The primary detractors will be the displaced staff and some facets of our schools and community. We will be viewed as insensitive and non-caring for our employees who have worked for us over a period of years. We can provide information to our detractors and try to reassure them that efforts will be made to assist displaced staff in securing employment and/or retirement. I. GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Curriculum supervisors will review all responsibilities associated with the operation of their departments and make the necessary adjustments with their remaining staff. These assignment changes will be monitored by the supervisors to ensure that services to the schools are satisfactory. The District proposes to reassign eight (8) academic support math teachers by eliminating the pull-out program for math in grades 1-3. Math support will be provided by the regular teachers. E. OBJECTIVE The objective of this recommendation is to provide appropriate math instruction for primary students in the regular classroom and to reduce the number of elementary academic support math teachers. This proposal will assist the District in the budget reduction process while supporting its overall goal to increase achievement for all students. Math specialists will assist regular teachers by equipping them with useful teaching methods, providing alternatives such as flexible use of time, creating betweenclass grouping plans, developing menus of effective alternative instruction approaches, etc. Extended Day services will also be an option for schools. Evaluation Criteria The revised instructional delivery of math services for students in grades 1-3 will be successfully operating in all schools as evidenced by: Increased student achievement. Improvement on standardized test scores. Increased number of students moving from bottom quartile to the next quartile. Increased number of students moving above the 50th percentile. Improved attendance for targeted students. Improved quality of math instruction provided by regular teachers. Over a period of several years of enhancing the teaching skills of regular teachers, the need for remediation should be reduced and these funds can be used to provide other types of support for students. F. IMP ACT ANALYSIS The implementation of this proposal will allow the District to focus on teaching and learning and, at the same time, reduce its budget. These displaced teachers will be reassigned to other positions in the District. We anticipate the availability of a number of teaching vacancies. Teachers will feel more comfortable in providing math instruction for their students. There will be more time for instruction by classroom teachers . .Desegregation Plan This proposal, implemented c\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eLittle Rock School District\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "}],"pages":{"current_page":648,"next_page":649,"prev_page":647,"total_pages":6766,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":7764,"total_count":81191,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"educator_resource_mediums_sms","items":[{"value":"lesson plans","hits":319},{"value":"teaching guides","hits":53},{"value":"timelines (chronologies)","hits":43},{"value":"online exhibitions","hits":38},{"value":"bibliographies","hits":15},{"value":"study guides","hits":11},{"value":"annotated bibliographies","hits":9},{"value":"learning modules","hits":6},{"value":"worksheets","hits":6},{"value":"slide shows","hits":4},{"value":"quizzes","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":40200},{"value":"StillImage","hits":35114},{"value":"MovingImage","hits":4552},{"value":"Sound","hits":3248},{"value":"Collection","hits":41},{"value":"InteractiveResource","hits":25}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"Peppler, Jim","hits":4965},{"value":"Phay, John E.","hits":4712},{"value":"University of Mississippi. Bureau of Educational Research","hits":4707},{"value":"Baldowski, Clifford H., 1917-1999","hits":2599},{"value":"Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission","hits":2255},{"value":"Thurmond, Strom, 1902-2003","hits":2077},{"value":"WSB-TV (Television station : Atlanta, Ga.)","hits":1475},{"value":"Newman, I. DeQuincey (Isaiah DeQuincey), 1911-1985","hits":1003},{"value":"The State Media Company (Columbia, S.C.)","hits":926},{"value":"Atlanta Journal-Constitution","hits":844},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":778}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"African Americans--Civil rights","hits":9441},{"value":"Civil rights","hits":8347},{"value":"African Americans","hits":5895},{"value":"Mississippi--Race relations","hits":5750},{"value":"Race relations","hits":5607},{"value":"Education, Secondary","hits":5083},{"value":"Education, Elementary","hits":4729},{"value":"Segregation in education--Mississippi","hits":4727},{"value":"Education--Pictorial works","hits":4707},{"value":"Civil rights demonstrations","hits":4436},{"value":"Civil rights workers","hits":3530}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966--Correspondence","hits":1888},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1809},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1709},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1312},{"value":"Baker, Augusta, 1911-1998","hits":1282},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1071},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":858},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":814},{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":719},{"value":"Mizell, M. Hayes","hits":674},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":626}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"name_authoritative_sms","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":2598},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1909},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1704},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1331},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1070},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":856},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":806},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":625},{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":605},{"value":"Snelling, Paula","hits":580},{"value":"Williams, Hosea, 1926-2000","hits":431}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Nobel Prize","hits":1763},{"value":"Ole Miss Integration","hits":1670},{"value":"Housing Act of 1961","hits":965},{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":704},{"value":"Memphis Sanitation Workers Strike","hits":366},{"value":"Selma-Montgomery March","hits":337},{"value":"Freedom Summer","hits":306},{"value":"Freedom Rides","hits":214},{"value":"Poor People's Campaign","hits":180},{"value":"University of Georgia Integration","hits":173},{"value":"University of Alabama Integration","hits":140}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":17820},{"value":"United States, Georgia, Fulton County, Atlanta, 33.749, -84.38798","hits":5428},{"value":"United States, Alabama, Montgomery County, Montgomery, 32.36681, -86.29997","hits":5151},{"value":"United States, Georgia, 32.75042, -83.50018","hits":4862},{"value":"United States, South Carolina, 34.00043, -81.00009","hits":4610},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":4177},{"value":"United States, Alabama, 32.75041, -86.75026","hits":3943},{"value":"United States, Mississippi, 32.75041, -89.75036","hits":2910},{"value":"United States, Tennessee, Shelby County, Memphis, 35.14953, -90.04898","hits":2579},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":2430},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":2387}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Georgia","hits":12843},{"value":"Alabama","hits":11307},{"value":"Mississippi","hits":10219},{"value":"South Carolina","hits":8503},{"value":"Arkansas","hits":4583},{"value":"Texas","hits":4399},{"value":"Tennessee","hits":3770},{"value":"Florida","hits":2601},{"value":"Ohio","hits":2391},{"value":"North Carolina","hits":1893},{"value":"New York","hits":1667}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1966","hits":10514},{"value":"1963","hits":10193},{"value":"1965","hits":10119},{"value":"1956","hits":9832},{"value":"1955","hits":9611},{"value":"1964","hits":9268},{"value":"1968","hits":9243},{"value":"1962","hits":9152},{"value":"1967","hits":8771},{"value":"1957","hits":8460},{"value":"1958","hits":8242},{"value":"1961","hits":8241},{"value":"1959","hits":8046},{"value":"1960","hits":7940},{"value":"1954","hits":7239},{"value":"1969","hits":7235},{"value":"1950","hits":7117},{"value":"1953","hits":6968},{"value":"1970","hits":6743},{"value":"1971","hits":6337},{"value":"1977","hits":6280},{"value":"1952","hits":6161},{"value":"1972","hits":6144},{"value":"1951","hits":6045},{"value":"1975","hits":5806},{"value":"1976","hits":5771},{"value":"1974","hits":5729},{"value":"1973","hits":5591},{"value":"1979","hits":5329},{"value":"1978","hits":5318},{"value":"1980","hits":5279},{"value":"1995","hits":4829},{"value":"1981","hits":4724},{"value":"1994","hits":4654},{"value":"1948","hits":4596},{"value":"1949","hits":4571},{"value":"1996","hits":4486},{"value":"1982","hits":4330},{"value":"1947","hits":4316},{"value":"1985","hits":4226},{"value":"1998","hits":4225},{"value":"1997","hits":4202},{"value":"1983","hits":4174},{"value":"1984","hits":4065},{"value":"1946","hits":4046},{"value":"1999","hits":4018},{"value":"1945","hits":4017},{"value":"1990","hits":3937},{"value":"1986","hits":3919},{"value":"1943","hits":3899},{"value":"1944","hits":3895},{"value":"1942","hits":3867},{"value":"2000","hits":3808},{"value":"2001","hits":3790},{"value":"1940","hits":3764},{"value":"1941","hits":3757},{"value":"1987","hits":3657},{"value":"2002","hits":3538},{"value":"1991","hits":3507},{"value":"1936","hits":3506},{"value":"1939","hits":3500},{"value":"1938","hits":3465},{"value":"1937","hits":3449},{"value":"1992","hits":3444},{"value":"1993","hits":3422},{"value":"2003","hits":3403},{"value":"1930","hits":3377},{"value":"1989","hits":3355},{"value":"1935","hits":3306},{"value":"1933","hits":3270},{"value":"1934","hits":3270},{"value":"1988","hits":3269},{"value":"1932","hits":3254},{"value":"1931","hits":3239},{"value":"2005","hits":3057},{"value":"2004","hits":2909},{"value":"1929","hits":2789},{"value":"2006","hits":2774},{"value":"1928","hits":2271},{"value":"1921","hits":2123},{"value":"1925","hits":2039},{"value":"1927","hits":2025},{"value":"1924","hits":2011},{"value":"1926","hits":2009},{"value":"1920","hits":1975},{"value":"1923","hits":1954},{"value":"1922","hits":1928},{"value":"2016","hits":1925},{"value":"2007","hits":1629},{"value":"2008","hits":1578},{"value":"2011","hits":1575},{"value":"2019","hits":1537},{"value":"1919","hits":1532},{"value":"2009","hits":1532},{"value":"1918","hits":1530},{"value":"2015","hits":1527},{"value":"2013","hits":1518},{"value":"2010","hits":1515},{"value":"2014","hits":1481},{"value":"2012","hits":1467}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"0193","max":"2035","count":500952,"missing":56},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"photographs","hits":10708},{"value":"correspondence","hits":9437},{"value":"black-and-white photographs","hits":7678},{"value":"negatives (photographs)","hits":7513},{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":4462},{"value":"letters (correspondence)","hits":3623},{"value":"oral histories (literary works)","hits":3607},{"value":"black-and-white negatives","hits":2740},{"value":"editorial cartoons","hits":2620},{"value":"newspapers","hits":1955},{"value":"manuscripts (documents)","hits":1692}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/","hits":41178},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":17554},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/UND/1.0/","hits":8828},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/","hits":6864},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/","hits":2186},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/","hits":1778},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-CR/1.0/","hits":1115},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","hits":197},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/","hits":60},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-RUU/1.0/","hits":51},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","hits":27}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Jim Peppler Southern Courier Photograph Collection","hits":4956},{"value":"John E. Phay Collection ","hits":4706},{"value":"John J. Herrera Papers","hits":3288},{"value":"Baldy Editorial Cartoons, 1946-1982, 1997: Clifford H. Baldowski Editorial Cartoons at the Richard B. Russell Library.","hits":2607},{"value":"Sovereignty Commission Online","hits":2335},{"value":"Strom Thurmond Collection, Mss 100","hits":2068},{"value":"Alabama Media Group Collection","hits":2067},{"value":"Black Trailblazers, Leaders, Activists, and Intellectuals in Cleveland","hits":2033},{"value":"Rosa Parks Papers","hits":1948},{"value":"Isaiah DeQuincey Newman, (1911-1985), Papers, 1929-2003","hits":1904},{"value":"Lillian Eugenia Smith Papers (circa 1920-1980)","hits":1887}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"John Davis Williams Library. Department of Archives and Special Collections","hits":8885},{"value":"Alabama. Department of Archives and History","hits":8146},{"value":"Atlanta University Center Robert W. Woodruff Library","hits":4102},{"value":"South Caroliniana Library","hits":4024},{"value":"University of North Texas. Libraries","hits":3854},{"value":"Hargrett Library","hits":3292},{"value":"University of South Carolina. Libraries","hits":3212},{"value":"Richard B. Russell Library for Political Research and Studies","hits":2874},{"value":"Mississippi. Department of Archives and History","hits":2825},{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":2633},{"value":"Rhodes College","hits":2264}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":80736},{"value":"Collection","hits":455}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":80994},{"value":"true","hits":197}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}