{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1414","title":"Report: ''Monitoring Report: The Little Rock School District, 1994-95 Incentive School Extended Year Program,'' Office of Desegregation Monitoring, United States District Court, Little Rock, Ark.","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)"],"dc_date":["1995-12-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School improvement programs","School integration","School management and organization"],"dcterms_title":["Report: ''Monitoring Report: The Little Rock School District, 1994-95 Incentive School Extended Year Program,'' Office of Desegregation Monitoring, United States District Court, Little Rock, Ark."],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1414"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":["59 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_625","title":"Program planning and budgeting tool, FY 1997","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1995-11-30"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance"],"dcterms_title":["Program planning and budgeting tool, FY 1997"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/625"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["budgets"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nLittle Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 1 Code PINV Name % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Jul 3 '95 Scheduled Finish Aug 31 '95 Revised Finish Resource Names Jackson 2 PINV Identify and revise DSeg and NonDSeg Programs 100% Jul 3 '95 Aug 11 '95 Jackson, Lewis,Smith RE 'i/' c. 3 3 PINV Review and adjust primary and secondary leaders for DSeg and NonDSeg Programs 100% Jul 17'95 Aug 14 '95 Lewis, Mayo NOV 3 0 1995 Office of Desegregation Mon ion 4 PINV Finalize list of DSeg and NonDSeg Programs 100% Aug 15 '95 Aug 18'95 Jackson,Lewis 5 PINV Generate a Program Inventory Report for 1995-96 100% Aug 18 '95 Aug 31 '95 Jackson,Lewis PEVAL PROGRAM EVALUATION 100% Jul 3 '95 Jackson 7 PEVAL Notify program managers that program evaluation begins in fall\nbegin data collection 100% Jul 3 '95 Jul 28 '95 Jackson 8 PEVAL Review/revise process for cabinet review of program evaluations 100% Aug 1 '95 Aug 15 '95 Jackson,Cabinet Page 1 FY97 November 30 '95Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 9 Code PEVAL Name Review/revise program evaluation instrument % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Aug 1 '95 Scheduled Finish Aug 15'95 Revised Finish Resource Names Cabinet,Jackson 10 PEVAL Distribute program evaluation instruments and instructions to primary and/or secondary leaders: provide additonal information/instruments, if needed 100% Aug 25 '95 Aug 25 '95 Jackson 11 PEVAL Conduct required training sessions describing the process and evaluation criteria for designated staff 100% Aug 4 '95 Aug 31 '95 Jackson 12 PEVAL Program evaluations due from secondary or primary leaders 100% Sep 15 '95 Sep 15 '95 Cabinet 13 PEVAL Review program evaluations (DSeg and NonDSeg) for potential target programs for extended evaluations 100% Sep 18 '95 Oct 2 '95 Cabinet 14 PEVAL Finalize identification of extended evaluation targets 100% Oct 2 '95 Oct 13'95 Cabinet 15 PEVAL Notify appropriate staff to prepare Extended Program Evaluations 100% Oct 16 '95 Oct 20 '95 Jackson,Cabinet 16 PEVAL Extended evaluations due 100% Nov 13 '95 Nov 13'95 Program Managers Page 2 FY97 November 30 '95Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 17 Code PEVAL Name Cabinet review extended evaluations for merge into needs assessment report % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Nov 17'95 Scheduled Finish Nov 22 '95 Revised Finish Resource Names Jackson NEEDS 100% Sep 1 '95 Nov 30 '95 Jackson.Cabinet 19 NEEDS Review types of data to measure needs of district for FY 96-97 100% Sep 1 '95 Sep 8 '95 Cabinet,Jackson 20 NEEDS Analyze results of the budgeting and planning priorities revealed from the 94-95 Needs Assessment Report 100% Sep 1 '95 Sep 8 '95 Jackson,Cabinet 21 NEEDS Review strategic planning mission statement and goals of the District (and implement) 100% Sep 1 '95 Sep 8 '95 Jackson,Cabinet 22 NEEDS Board identifies District concerns for input from public at Town Hall/District Dialogues 100% Sep 14 '95 Sep 14 '95 Williams,Board 23. NEEDS STANFORD 8 TEST DATA STUDY 4^^ 100% Seo 11 '95 Oct 31 '95 Jackson 24 NEEDS Define purpose and scope for Stanford 8 Test data study 100% Sep 11 '95 Sep 15 '95 Jackson,Cabinet Page 3 FY97 November 30 '95Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 25 Code NEEDS Name Assign responsibilities for study of Stanford 8 Test data % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Sep 11 '95 Scheduled Finish Sep 15 '95 Revised Finish Resource Names Jackson 26 NEEDS Design data collection plan for study of Stanford 100% Sep 11 '95 Sep 15 95 Jackson,Lacey 27 NEEDS Collect and analyze data from Stanford 8 Test (Spring 95 administration) 100% Sep 15 '95 Oct 13'95 Jackson,Lacey,Savage 28 NEEDS Prepare Stanford 8 Test Report 100% Oct 13'95 Oct 31 '95 Lacey 29 NEEDS Submit Stanford 8 Test Report to PRE for merge into needs assessment 100% Oct 31 '95 Oct 31 '95 Jackson,Lacey NEEDS PRE EDUCATIONAL EQUITY MONITORING REPORTS SURVEY 100% Seo 11 '95 Oct 31 '95 Jackson 31 NEEDS Define purpose and scope for PRE Educational Equity Monitoring Reports Study 100% Sep 11 '95 Sep 15 '95 Jackson,Cabinet 32 NEEDS Assign responsibilities tor PRE Educational Equity Monitoring Reports Study 100% Sep 11 '95 Sep 15'95 Jackson Page 4 FY97 November 30 '95Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 33 Code NEEDS Name Analyze data from PRE Educational Equity Monitoring Reports Studies % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Sep 18 '95 Scheduled Finish Sep 30 '95 Revised Finish Resource Names Jackson,Smith 34 NEEDS Prepare PRE Educational Equity Monitoring findings 100% Oct 2 '95 Oct 13'95 Smith 35 NEEDS Submit PRE Educational Equity Monitoring Reports Study to PRE for merge into needs assessment listing 100% Oct 31 '95 Oct 31 '95 Jackson,Smith 3fi NEEDS SCHOOL CLIMATE/HUMAN RELATIONS SURVEY ISC/HRISTUDY 100% Seo 11 '95 Oct 31 '95 Jackson 37 NEEDS Define purpose and scope of SC/HR Survey 100% Sep 11 '95 Sep 15 '95 Jackson,Cabinet 38 NEEDS Assign responsibilities for SC/HR data collections 100% Sep 11 '95 Sep 15 '95 Jackson 39 NEEDS Design data collection plan for study of SC/HR 100% Sep 11 '95 Sep 15 '95 Jackson,Hobby 40 NEEDS Collect and analyze data from SC/HR Survey 100% Sep 15 '95 Oct 13'95 Jackson,Hobby Page 5 FY97 November 30 '95Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 41 Code NEEDS Name Prepare SC/HR Survey Report % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Oct 13'95 Scheduled Finish Oct 31 '95 Revised Finish Resource Names Hobby 42 NEEDS Submit SC/HR Survey Report to PRE for merge into needs assessment 100% Oct 31 '95 Oct 31 '95 Jackson.Hobby 43 NEEDS PORPORTIONALS ALLOCATION FORMULAS STUDY 100% Seo 11 '95 Smith. Milhollen 44 NEEDS Define purpose and scope of Proportional Allocation Formulas 100% Sep 11 '95 Sep 15 '95 Smith,Milhollen,Cabinet 45 NEEDS Assign responsibilities for Proportional Allocation Formulas 100% Sep 11 '95 Sep 15 '95 Smith 46 NEEDS Design data collections plan for Proportional Allocation Formulas 100% Sep 11 '95 Sep 15 '95 Smith 47 NEEDS Collect and analyze data for Proportional Allocation Formulas 100% Sep 15 '95 Oct 13'95 Hurley,Eaton,Gadberry,Neal,Milhollen,Smith 48 NEEDS Prepare Proportional Allocation Formulas Report 100% Oct 13 '95 Oct 31 '95 Milhollen, Hurley,Eaton,Neal,Smith Page 6 FY97 November 30 '95Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 49 Code NEEDS Name_______________________________ Submit Proportional Allocations Formulas Study Report to PRE for merge into needs assessment listing % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Oct 31 '95 Scheduled Finish Oct 31 '95 Revised Finish Resource Names Milhollen 5Q NEEDS DISTRICTWIDE FACILITIES STUDY 100% Sep 11 '95 Qct 3t.'95 Smith 51 NEEDS Define purpose and scope of Districtwide Facilities Sfudy/Report from 1994-95 Study for purposes of 1995-96 Needs Assessment Report 100% Sep 11 '95 Sep 15 '95 Williams,Smith,Cabinet 52 NEEDS Assign responsibilities for the Districtwide Facilities Study/Reporting of findings 100% Sep 11 '95 Sep 15 '95 Smith,Eaton 53 NEEDS Prepare findings from the Disfrictwide Facilities Study 100% Sep 16'95 Oct 31 '95 Nov 15'95 Smith,Mayo, Eaton,Vann 54 NEEDS Submit Districtwide Facilities Study Report recommendations to PRE for merge into needs assessment report (recommendations cited in this report are subject to change) 100% Oct 31 '95 Oct 31 '95 Smith,Mayo,Eaton 5 NEEDS DESEGREGATION MONITORING REPORTS AUDIT FROM PPM 100% Sep 11 '95 Nov 30 '95 Mavo 56 NEEDS Define purpose and scope of Desegregation Monitoring Reports Audit 100% Sep 11 '95 Sep 15 '95 Williams,Mayo,Cabinet Page 7 FY97 November 30 '95ID 57 Code NEEDS Name Assign responsibility for data colledion of transcripts and Desegregation Monitoring Reports Audit- Little Rock School Distrid Program Planning and Budgeting Tool % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Sep 11 '95 Scheduled Finish Sep 15'95 Revised Finish Resource Names Mayo 58 NEEDS Design data collection plan for study of Desegregation Monitoring Reports Audit 100% Sep 11 95 Sep 15'95 Mayo 59 NEEDS Coiled data 100% Sep 18'95 Od 13'95 Mayo 60 NEEDS Review with Cabinet and Attorneys 100% Od 16 '95 Oct 31 '95 Mayo 61 NEEDS Report findings to PRE 100% Od 31 '95 Nov 18'95 Mayo 62 NEEDS Merge new obligations with Program Budget Document 100% Nov 1 '95 Nov 30 '95 Mayo,Lewis 63 NEEDS COURT ORDERS AUDIT 100% Seo 11 '95 Nov 30 '95 Mavo 64 NEEDS Define purpose and scope of Court Orders Audit 100% Sep 11 '95 Sep 15'95 Cabinet,Mayo Page 8 FY97 November 30 '95Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 65 Code NEEDS Name Assign responsibility for data collection of Court Orders Audit % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Sep 11 '95 Scheduled Finish Sep 15'95 Revised Finish Resource Names Mayo 66 NEEDS Collect data 100% Sep 18 '95 Oct 13'95 Mayo 67 NEEDS Review with Cabinet and Attorneys 100% Oct 16 '95 Oct 31 '95 Mayo 68 NEEDS Report findings to PRE 100% Nov 1 '95 Nov 18'95 Mayo 69 NEEDS Merge new obligations with Program Budget Document 100% Nov 1 '95 Nov 30 '95 Mayo. Lewis 2fl NEEDS TOWN HALL MEETINGS 100% Sep 11 '95 Nov 21 '95 Williams. Jackson.Modeste 71 NEEDS Define purpose and scope of Town Hall Meetings 100% Sep 11 '95 Sep 15'95 Jackson.Modeste.Cabinet 72 NEEDS Review previous years data from Town Hall Report 100% Sep 11 '95 Sep 15 '95 Modeste. Jackson,Vann Page 9 FY97 November 30 '95Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 73 Code NEEDS Name Review and data collection plan (matrix)for Town Hall Meetings % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Sep 11 '95 Scheduled Finish Sep 15 '95 Revised Finish Resource Names Jackson. Vann.Lewis 74 NEEDS Set locations and schedule for Town Hall Meeting 100% Sep 11 95 Sep 15'95 Vann.Modeste 75 NEEDS Develop advertisement plan and schedule for Town Hall Meetings\nPrepare sample agenda 100% Sep 11 '95 Sep 15 '95 Vann.Modeste 76 NEEDS Execute advertisement plan for Town Hall Meeting I 100% Sep 10'95 Oct 31 '95 Vann.Modeste 77 NEEDS Conduct Town Hall Meeting I 100% Sep 10 '95 Oct 31 '95 Williams 70 NEEDS Gather feedback data from Town Hall Meeting I for input into matrix 100% Sep 10 '95 Oct 31 '95 Vann.Lewis 79 NEEDS Execute advertisement plan for Town Hall Meeting II 100% Sep 10'95 Oct 31 '95 Vann.Modeste 00 NEEDS Conduct Town Hall Meeting II 100% Sep 10 '95 Oct 31 '95 Nov 9 '95 Williams Page 10 FY97 November 30 '95 JLittle Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 81 Code NEEDS Name Gather feedback data from Town Hall Meeting II for input into matrix % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Sep 18 '95 Scheduled Finish Oct 31 '95 Revised Finish Nov 9 '95 Resource Names Vann,Lewis 82 NEEDS Execute advertisement plan for Town Hall Meeting III 100% Sep 18 '95 Oct 31 '95 Nov 14 '95 Vann.Modeste 83 NEEDS Conduct Town Hall Meeting III 100% Nov 14 '95 Nov 14 '95 Williams 84 NEEDS Finalize and publish Town Hall Meeting Report 100% Nov 1 '95 Nov 15'95 Nov 17'95 Modeste, Lewis 85 NEEDS Merge findings of Town Hall Meeting Report, 1995-96 into needs assessment listing 100% Nov 15'95 Nov 21 '95 Jackson,Lewis 100% Nov 21 '95 Williams. Jackson. Modeste 87 NEEDS Define purpose and scope of District Dialogues 100% Sep 11 '95 Sep 15 '95 Williams, Jackson,Modeste,Cabinet 88 NEEDS Review previous years data from District Dialogue Report 100% Sep 11 '95 Sep 15 '95 Modeste,Vann Page 11 FY97 November 30 '95Little Rock School Distnct Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 89 Code NEEDS Name Review data collection plan (matrix) for District Dialogues % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Sep 11 '95 Scheduled Finish Sep 15'95 Revised Finish Resource Names_____ Jackson. Vann.Modeste 90 NEEDS Set locations and schedule for District Dialogue Meetings 100% Sep 11 '95 Sep 15'95 Modeste.Vann 91 NEEDS Develop advertisement plan and schedule for District Dialogues\nprepare sample agenda 100% Sep 11 '95 Sep 15 '95 Vann.Modeste 92 NEEDS Execute advertisement plan for District Dialogue l(Principals) 100% Sep 18 '95 Oct 31 '95 Vann.Modeste 93 NEEDS Conduct District Dialogue I 100% Sep 18 '95 Oct 31 '95 Williams 94 NEEDS Gather feedback from District Dialogue 1 for input into matrix 100% Sep 18 '95 Oct 31 '95 Vann,Lewis 95 NEEDS Execute advertisement plan for District Dialogue ll(Ass't Principals) 100% Sep 18 '95 Oct 31 '95 Vann.Modeste 96 NEEDS Conduct District Dialogue II 100% Sep 18 '95 Oct 31 '95 Williams Page 12 FY97 Novemtser 30 '95Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 97 Code NEEDS Name Gather feedback data from District Dialogue II for input into matrix % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Sep 18 '95 Scheduled Finish Oct 31 '95 Revised Finish Resource Names Vann,Lewis 98 NEEDS Execute advertisement plan for District Dialogue lll(Teachers) 100% Sep 18 '95 Oct 31 '95 Nov 1 '95 Vann,Modeste 99 NEEDS Conduct District Dialogue III 100% Sep 18 '95 Oct 31 '95 Nov 1 '95 Williams 100 NEEDS Gather feedback data from District Dialogue III for merge into matrix 100% Sep 18 '95 Oct 31 '95 Nov 6 '95 Vann,Lewis 101 NEEDS Execute advertisement plan for District Dialogue IV(Admin. and Classified) 100% Sep 18 '95 Oct 31 '95 Nov 6 '95 Vann,Modeste 102 NEEDS Conduct District Dialogue IV 100% Sep 18 '95 Oct 31 '95 Nov 6 '5 Williams 103 NEEDS Gather feedback data from District Dialogue IV for input into matrix 100% Sep 18 '95 Oct 31 '95 Nov 6 '95 Vann,Lewis 104 NEEDS Execute advertisement plan for District Dialogue V(Transportation) 100% Sep 18 '95 Oct 31 '95 Nov 8 '95 Vann.Modeste Page 13 FY97 November 30 '95Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 105 Code NEEDS Name Conduct District Dialogue V % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Sep 18 '95 Scheduled Finish Oct 31 '95 Revised Finish Nov 8 '95 Resource Names Williams 106 NEEDS Gather feedback data from District Dialogue V for input into matrix 100% Sep 18 '95 Oct SI '95 Nov 8 '95 Vann,Lewis 107 NEEDS Finalize and publish District Dialogue Report 1995-96 100% Nov 1 '95 Nov 15'95 Nov 17'95 Jackson.Lewis 108 NEEDS Merge findings of District Dialogue Report 1995-96 into needs assessment listing 100% Nov 15'95 Nov 21 '95 Jackson,Lewis 109 NEEDS PREPARE NEEDS ASSESSMENT REPORT 100% Nov 1 '95 Nov 30 '95 Jackson 110 NEEDS Conduct Administrative review of available districtwide reports and objective data 100% Nov 1 '95 Nov 15'95 Jackson,Cabinet 111 NEEDS Review of available districtwide reports and objective data by Board 100% Nov 1 '95 Nov 15'95 Williams, Jackson,Board 112 NEEDS Publish Draft of Needs Assessment /Report and disseminate to selected persons 100% Nov 27 '95 Nov 27 '95 Jackson,Cabinet Page 14 FY97 November 30 '95Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 113 Code NEEDS Name________________________________ Publish Needs Assessment Report, 1995-96 % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Nov 30 '95 Scheduled Finish Nov 30 '95 Revised Finish Resource Names Jackson 114 Oct 2 '95 Jan 31 '96 Jackson 11\u0026amp; GOALS CABINET PLANNING SESSION 63% Oct 2 '95 Dec 11 '95 Jackson.Cabinet 116 GOALS Review 1994-95 Needs Assessment Report 100%, Oct 2 '95 Oct 31 '95 Jackson,Cabinet 117 GOALS Distribute 1995-96 Needs Assessment Report to Cabinet members 0% Dec 1 '95 Dec 8 '95 Jackson,Cabinet 118 GOALS Distribute District goals to Cabinet 0% Dec 1 '95 Dec 8 '95 Jackson,Cabinet 119 GOALS Cabinet review of goals 0% Dec 11 '95 Dec 11 '95 Jackson,Cabinet Page 15 120 BOARD WORK SESSION 51% Nov 15 '95 Dec 19 '95 Jackson. 'illiams FY97 November 30 '95 Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 121 Code GOALS Name Establish date and site for Work Session % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Nov 15'95 Scheduled Finish Nov 30 '95 Revised Finish Resource Names Williams.Cabinet 122 \\ GOALS J identify materiais for Board Work Session 100y Nov 15'95 Nov 30 '95 Jacks\u0026lt;w,Williams 123 GOALS Prepare materials for Board Work Session 100% Nov 15'95 Nov 30 '95 Jackson 124 GOALS Conduct Board Work Session 0% Dec 12'95 Dec 15 '95 Board,Williams 125 GOALS Distribute background materials to Board members 0% Dec 12'95 Dec 15'95 Jackson 126 GOALS Review/revise mission statement and goals (review Strategic Planning mission statement) 0% Dec 12 '95 Dec 15 '95 BoaN^*. 127 GOALS Review DSeg and NonDSeg Program Inventory 0% Dec 12 '95 Dec 15 '95 Board 128 ^^AL^I^eview id^tified^ropprtiongj aljjcations Dec 12'95 Dec 15 '95 Board Page 16 FY97 November 30 '95 Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 129 Code GOALS Name________________ Establish written priorities % Complete 0% Scheduled Start Dec 12'95 Scheduled Finish Dec 15 '95 Revised Finish Resource Names Board 130 GOALS Identify strategies for funding shortfalls Dec 12'95 Dec 15 '95 Board 131 GOALS Develop timeline for identification and researching of funding shortfall strategies 132 GOALS Develop communication strategy tor mission statement and goals 133 GOALS Distribute mission statement and goals 134 GOALS Distribute list of priorities 135 GOALS BOARD RETREAT 136 GOALS Determine date and site for Board Retreat Page 17 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Dec 12 '95 Dec 15'95 Board Dec 14 '95 Dec 14 '95 Williams,Vann Dec 19'95 Dec 19'95 Jackson,Vann Dec 19 '95 Dec 19 '95 Jackson,Vann Pec 8 '.95 Dec 8 '95 FY97 Jan 31 '96 Dec 20 '95 Williams Williams,Board November 30 '95ID 137 Code GOALS Name Identify agenda items for Board Retreat 138 GOALS Establish agenda for Board Retreat 139 GOALS Identify materials for Board Retreat 140 GOALS Distribute materials for Board Retreat 141 GOALS Conduct data analysis work session in preparation for Board Retreat 142 GOALS Conduct Board Retreat 143 GOALS Report outcomes of Board Retreat 144 Page 18 Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool % Complete 0% Scheduled Start Dec 8 '95 Scheduled Finish Dec 20 '95 Revised Finish Resource Names Williams,Board 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Dec 8 '95 Dec 8 '95 Jan 9 '96 Jan 12 '96 Jan 22 '96 Jan 31 '96 Nov 1 '95 FY97 Dec 20 '95 Dec 20 '95 Jan 10'96 Jan 12 '96 Jan 26 '96 Jan 31 '96 Aug 30 '96 Williams,Board Williams,Jackson Williams,Jackson Williams,Cabinet Williams,Board Williams,Board Jackson,Sabinet November 30 '95 Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 145 Name 146 PDEV 147 PDEV 148 PDEV 149 PDEV 150 PDEV 151 PDEV 152 PDEV Page 19 SUBMIT BUSINESS CASE FOR PROGRAM AND/OR MODIFICATIONS TO SUPERINTENDENT Review process for program development Use extended program evaluations to identify program additions, modifications, deletions Notify appropriate staff to prepare Business Cases on results of extended program evaluations Review recommendations from district needs assessment report in order to identify additional programs or programs modifications resulting in business case(s) Business Cases due Review of Business Cases by Cabinet Submit Business Cases for program and/or program modifications to Board of Directors oy 100% 100% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% Scheduled Start Nov 1 '95 Nov 1 '95 Nov 17'95 Nov 17'95 Dec 5 '95 Jan 8 '96 Jan 15 '96 Feb 8 '96 FY97 Scheduled Finish Feb 22 '96 Nov 10'95 Nov 27 '95 Nov 30 '95 Dec 11 '95 Jan 8 '96 Jan 22 '96 Feb 8 '96 Revised Finish Resource Williams Cabinet.Jackson Cabinet Cabinet Cabinet Primary Leaders Cabinet Jac^on, Williams November 30 '95 Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 153 Code PDEV Name Review of Business Cases by Board % Complete 0% Scheduled Start Feb 8 '96 Scheduled Finish Feb 22 '96 Revised Finish Resource Names Board BUDGT BUDGETING Nov 20 95 Auq 30 '96 adberrv.Hurlev.Milhollen 155 BUDGT Develop budget preparation training materials 100% Nov 20 '95 Nov 27 '95 Smith,Milhollen 156 BUDGT Conduct budget preparation training sessions and distribute instructions for budget preparation training at all levels 100% Dec 1 '95 Dec 8 '95 Smith 157 BUDGT Budget managers develop and submit revised 1995-96 expense budget revisions and 1996-97 expense budget requests 0% Dec 11 '95 Jan 6 '96 Milhollen,Smith 158 BUDGT Begin districtwide expense budget consolidation and executive review process 0% Jan 9 '96 Mar 8 '96 Smith 159 BUDGT Year to date revenue expenditure analysis 0% Jan 9 '96 Jan 31 '96 Smith,Milhollen 160 BUDGT Revise financial forecast for coming year 0% Feb 26 '96 Mar 6 '96 Smith Page 20 I FY97 November 30 '95 Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 161 Code BUDGT Name Submit proposed budget to Board % Complete 0% Scheduled Start Mar 14 '96 Scheduled Finish Mar 14 '96 Revised Finish Resource Names Williams 162 BUDGT Conduct Board Work Sessions on proposed budget 0% Mar 18'96 Mar 29 '96 Smith.Board, Wiliiams 163 BUDGT Revise proposed budget, as needed 0% Mar 14'96 Apr 2 '96 Smith,Milhollen 164 BUDGT Prepare tentative budget 0% Apr 3 '96 May 13'96 Smith,Milhollen 165 BUDGT Board review of tentative budget 0% May 23 '96 May 23 '96 Board,Smith 166 BUDGT Conduct Board Work Session on tentative Budget 0% May 24 '96 May 31 '96 Board, Williams 167 BUDGT Account reconciliation and Purchase Order (PO) clean-up 0% Jun 17'96 Jul 12'96 Eaton 168 BUDGT Receipt of state generated revenue numbers (payroll liabilities, adjusted supplemental payroll, last payroll, Carl Perkins, M to M, JTPA, Vocational Ed., Chapters 1 and 2. Compensatory Ed., MFPA, Transportation, ABC) 0% Jun 16 '96 Jun 16 '96 Milhollen,Smith Page 21 FY97 November 30 '95Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 169 Code BUDGT Name Close-out 1995-96 accounts: adjust physical inventory, (fiscal)federal grants, magnet, state grants, accruals % Complete 0% Scheduled Start Jul 1 '96 Scheduled Finish Jul 19 '96 Revised Finish Resource Names Smith,Milhollen,Cabinet 170 BUDGT Compute ending fund balance 0% Jul 22 '96 Jul 22 '96 Milhollen,Smith 171 BUDGT Administrative review of final budget 0% Jul 24 '96 Jul 29 '96 Williams.Cabinet 172 BUDGT Submit final budget to Board 0% Aug 1 '96 Aug 1 '96 Williams,Smith 173 BUDGT Board review and adoption of 96-97 final budget 0% Aug 1 '96 Aug 8 '96 Board 174 BUDGT Submit final Budget to Court/Parties 0% Aug 8 '96 Aug 21 '96 Williams,Attorney 175 BUDGT Submit 96-97 final budget to State 0% Aug 21 '96 Aug 30 '96 Williams,Smith 12fi BUDGT Staffing 0% Jan 26 '96 Aug 15 '96 Hurley Page 22 FY97 November 30 '95 7Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 177 Code BUDGT Name_________________________________ First review of changes in course offerings by Board % Complete 0% Scheduled Start Jan 26 '96 Scheduled Finish Feb 8 '96 Revised Finish Resource Names Board,Williams 178 BUDGT Meeting with counselors and principals to review courses offerings 1995-96 0% Jan 29 '96 Feb 1596 Elston 179 BUDGT Print secondary course selection sheets 0% Jan 29 *96 Feb 15'96 Williams,Gadberry 180 BUDGT Counselors meet with students and complete course selection sheets 0% Feb 19'96 Mar 8 '96 Principals,Counselors 181 BUDGT Counselors send course selection sheets to receiving schools 0% Mar 8 '96 Mar 11 '96 Principals,Counselors 182 BUDGT Registrars tally course selections 0% Mar 11 '96 Mar 29 '96 Principals,Registrars 183 BUDGT Review course tallies secondary. Note possible staffing changes based on courses requested 0% Apr 1 '96 Apr 19 '96 Gadberry,Hurley,Asst. Supts. 184 BUDGT Identify elementary enrollment (tentative) for 1995-96 0% Apr 1 '96 May 19'96 Mayo,Hurley,Gadberry .Asst Supts Page 23 FY97 November 30 '95ID 185 Code BUDGT Name____________________________ Make determination by subject area (secondary) of possible changes and by projected elementary enrolled Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool % Complete 0% Scheduled Start Apr 1 '96 Scheduled Finish Apr 19'96 Revised Finish Resource Names__________ Gadberry,Hurley,Assf. Supts. 186 BUDGT List known retirements, resignations, and intern positions 0% Apr 3 '96 Apr 24 '96 Gadberry,Hurley 187 BUDGT Identify certified personnel for Reduction in Force (RIF), if needed 0% Apr 17'96 Apr 26 '96 Hurley,Gadberry 188 BUDGT Notify certified personnel of Reduction in Force (RIF), if needed staff reduction 0% Apr 24 '96 Apr 29 '96 Hurley,Gadberry 189 BUDGT Recall certified personnel from RIF, it needed 0% Jun 3 '96 Aug 1 '96 Hurley,Gadberry 190 BUDG Notify classified personnel of staff reduction 0% May 6 '96 Jul 15'96 Hurley,Gadberry 191 BUDGT Recall classified personnel from RIF, if needed 0% Jun 3 '96 Aug 15'96 Hurley 192 BUDGT EBQVIDE BROAD-BASED INTERNAL AND 0% Feb 1 '96 Apr 30 '96 Modeste.Vann. Williams Page 24 FY97 November 30 '95 7Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 193 Code BUDGT Name Plan for internal and external feedback. Set locations and dates % Complete 0% Scheduled Start Feb 1 '96 Scheduled Finish Feb 15'96 Revised Finish Resource Names Williams,Modeste,Vann 194 BUDGT Execute advertisement for district feedback. Session I 0% Feb 1 '96 Apr 30 '96 Modeste.Vann 195 BUDGT Conduct District Feedback Session I 0% Feb 1 '96 Apr 30 '96 Williams 196 BUDGT Execute advertisement plan for district feedback. Session II 0% Feb 1 '96 Apr 30 '96 Modeste.Vann 197 BUDGT Conduct District Feedback Session II 0% Feb 1 '96 Apr 30 '96 Williams 198 BUDGT Execute advertisement for district feedback. Session III 0% Feb 1 '96 Apr 30 '96 Williams 199 BUDGT Conduct district feedback, Session III 0% Feb 1 '96 Apr 30 '96 Williams 200 BUDGT Execute advertisement plan for Town Hall feedback. Session I 0% Feb 1 '96 Apr 30 '96 Modeste.Vann Page 25 FY97 November 30 '95Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 201 Code BUDGT Name Conduct Town Hall feedback. Session I % Complete 0% Scheduled Start Feb 1 '96 Scheduled Finish Apr 30 '96 Revised Finish Resource Names Williams 202 BUDGT Execute advertisement plan for Town Hall feedback. Session II 0% Feb 1 '96 Apr 30 '96 Modeste,Vann 203 BUDGT Conduct Town Hall feedback , Session II 0% Feb 1 '96 Apr 30 '96 Williams 204 BUDGT Execute advertisement for Town Hall feedback, Session III 0% Feb 1 '96 Apr 30 '96 Williams 205 BUDGT Conduct Town Hall feedback, Session III 0% Feb 1 '96 Apr 30 '96 Modeste,Vann 206 MR MONITORING AND REPORTING OF DESEG AND NONDESEG PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT REPORTS (1ST QUARTER: 2ND QUARTER: 3RD QUARTER: 4TH QUARTER! 36% Aug 1 '95 Aug 31 '96 Jackson 207 MR PRE performs necessary diskette management functions for the summer (i.e. archival filing, achievement erasures, copying, etc.) 100% Aug 1 '95 Aug 17'95 PRE Clerical 208 MR Revise written program budget document instructions, as needed 100% Aug 31 '95 Sep 5 '95 Lewis Page 26 FY97 November 30 '95 JLittle Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 209 Code MR Name PRE forward program budget document diskettes to principals and program managers % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Aug 31 '95 Scheduled Finish Sep 5 '95 Revised Finish Resource Names PRE Clerical,Lewis 210 MR Distribute written program budget document instructions to principals and program managers 100% Sep 1 '95 Sep 5 '95 Lewis.PRE Clerical 211 MR Plan maintenance education and orientation regarding the program budget document process 100% Aug 1 '95 Aug 31 '95 Jack son,Lewis 212 MR Conduct maintenance education workshops and orientation sessions regarding the program budget document process for principals, clerical staff, program managers, primary and secondary leaders 100% Sep 4 '95 Sep 30 '95 Jackson,Lewis 213 MR 1ST QUARTER PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT REPORTS 86% Aug 8 '95 Dec 21 '95 Jackson 214 MR Review program budget document with program managers and principals 100% Aug 8 '95 Oct 14 '95 Asst. Supts,Lewis,PRE Clerical 215 MR Generate diskette management flow information to relative staff School Operations and PRE office 100% Aug 8 '95 Aug 31 '95 Jackson,Lewis 216 MR Carryout training sessions on the Program Budget Document and WordPerfect 100% Sep 2 '95 Sep 15 '95 Lewis,Jackson Page 27 FY97 November 30 '95Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 217 Code MR Name Send reminder notice regarding deadline for submission of 1st Quarter PBD diskettes % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Oct 3 '95 Scheduled Finish Oct 3 '95 Revised Finish Resource Names Lewis 218 MR DSeg and NonDSeg diskettes returned to PRE 100% Oct 14 '95 Oct 14 '95 Principais,Program Managers 219 MR PRE performs check-in procedures and data clean-up on diskettes 100% Oct 16 '95 Nov 8 '95 PRE Ciericai,Lewis 220 MR PRE generate hard copies of diskettes 100% Oct 16 '95 Nov 8 '95 PRE Clerical 221 MR PRE develops narrative and the Controller provides financial info for the PBD reports 100% Oct 16 '95 Oct 31 '95 Lewis,Milhollen 222 MR PRE combines all information for the 1st Quarter Program Budget Report 100% Oct 31 '95 Nov 8 '95 Lewis,PRE Clerical 223 MR Submit report to Attorney for review 100% Nov 8 '95 Nov 13'95 Lewis 224 MR Prepare for publication of 1st Quarter Program Budget Document Reports 100% Nov 13 '95 Nov 13'95 Lewis,Jackson Page 28 FY97 November 30 '95Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 225 Code MR Name Submit 1st Quarter Program Budget Document Reports to Court % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Nov 21 '95 Scheduled Finish Nov 21 '95 Revised Finish Resource Names Jackson,Attorney 226 MR Return diskettes and hard copies to managers and principals 100% Nov 21 '95 Nov 22 '95 PRE Cierical 227 MR Primary leaders provide feedback to the secondary people regarding achievement reporting in the PBD 0% Nov 21 '95 Dec 21 '95 Primary Leaders 223 MR 2ND QUARTER PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT REPORTS 0% Nov 21 '95 Mar 22 '96 Jackson 229 MR Advise program managers and principals on Programs Budget Document 0% Nov 21 '95 Jan 13 '96 Asst. Supts,Lewis 230 MR Send reminder notice regarding deadline for submission of 2nd Quarter PBD diskettes 0% Jan 6 '96 Jan 6 '96 Lewis 231 MR Diskettes due back to PRE 0% Jan 13 '96 Jan 13 '96 Program Managers.Principais 232 MR PRE performs check-in procedures and data clean-up on diskettes 0% Jan 13 '96 Jan 26 '96 PRE Clericai Page 29 FY97 November 30 '95I Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 233 Code MR Name PRE generates hard copies of diskettes % Complete 0% Scheduled Start Jan 15'96 Scheduled Finish Jan 31 '96 Revised Finish Resource Names PRE Clerical 234 MR PRE revises narrative and the controller provides financial info for Program Budget Document Reports (DSeg and NonDSeg) 0% Jan 29 '96 Feb 3 '96 Lewis,Milhollen 235 MR PRE combines all revised information for 2nd Quarter Program Budget Document Reports 0% Jan 29 '96 Feb 3 '96 Lewis.PRE Clerical 236 MR Submit report to Attorney for review 0% Feb 14 '96 Feb 19'96 Attorney,Jackson 237 MR Prepare publication of 2nd Quarter Program Budget Document Reports 0% Feb 22 '96 Feb 22 '96 Lewis 238 MR Submit 2nd Quarter Program Budget Document Reports to Court 0% Feb 23 '96 Feb 23 '96 Jackson ,Attomey 239 MR Return diskettes and paper copies to principals and program managers 0% Feb 23 '96 Feb 24 '96 PRE Clerical 240 MR Primary leaders provide feedback to their secondary people regarding achievement reporting in the PBD 0% Feb 23 '96 Mar 22 '96 Primary Leaders Page 30 FY97 November 30 '95 JLittle Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 241 Code MR Name 3RD QUARTER PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT REPORTS % Complete 0% Scheduled Start Feb 23 '96 Scheduled Finish Jun 24 '96 Revised Finish Resource Names Jackson 242 MR Advise program managers and principals on the Program Budget Document 0% Feb 23 '96 Apr 12'96 Asst. Supts,Lewis 243 MR Send reminder notice regarding deadline for submission of 3rd Quarter PBD diskettes 0% Mar 7 '96 Mar 7 '96 Lewis 244 MR Diskettes due back to PRE 0% Apr 12'96 Apr 12'96 Principals,Program Managers 245 MR PRE performs check-in procedures and data clean-up on diskettes 0% Apr 15'96 Apr 28 '96 PRE Clerical 246 MR PRE generate hard copies of diskettes 0% Apr 15'96 May 3 '96 PRE Clerical 247 MR PRE revises narrative and the controller provides financial information for 3rd Quarter Program Budget Document Reports 0% Apr 29 '96 May 3 '96 Lewis,Milhollen 248 MR PRE combines all revised information for 3rd Quarter PBD Reports 0% May 6 '96 May 10'96 Lewis,PRE Clerical Page 31 FY97 November 30 '95Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 249 Code MR Name Submit report to Attorney for review % Complete 0% Scheduled Start May 13'96 Scheduled Finish May 16 '96 Revised Finish Resource Names Lewis 250 MR Prepare publication of 3rd Quarter Program Budget Document Reports 0% May 20 '96 May 23 '96 Lewis 251 MR Submit 3rd Quarter Program Budget Document to Court 0% May 24 '96 May 24 '96 Jackson,Attorney 252 MR Return diskettes and paper copies to principals and program managers 0% May 24 '96 May 27 '96 PRE Clerical 253 MR Primary leaders provide feedback to their secondary people regarding achievement reporting in the PBD 0% May 24 '96 Jun 24 '96 Primary Leaders 254 MR 4th QUARTER PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT REPORTS 0% May 9 '96 Aug 31 '96 Jackson 255 MR Advise program managers and principals on Program Budget Document 0% May 22 '96 Jul 22 '96 Asst. Supts,Lewis,PRE Clerical 256 MR Send reminder notice for completing the PBD to principals and program managers 0% May 9 '96 May 15'96 Lewis Page 32 FY97 November 30 '95Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 257 Code MR Name Principals submit School Operations Diskettes to Asst. Supts. % Complete 0% Scheduled Start Jun 10 '96 Scheduled Finish Jun 16 '96 Revised Finish Resource Names Principals 258 MR Diskettes due from Program Managers who are on a less than 12 month contract 0% Jun 10 '96 Jun 16 '96 Program Managers 259 MR All Program diskettes due back to PRE 0% Jul 14 '96 Jul 14 '96 Program Managers 260 MR PRE performs check-in procedures and data clean-up 0% Jul 15'96 Jul 28 '96 PRE Clerical,Lewis 261 MR PRE develops narrative and the controller provides financial information for 4th quarter Program Budget Document Reports 0% Jul 29 '96 Aug 4 '96 Lewis,Milhollen 262 MR PRE combines all information for 4th Quarter Program Budget Document Reports 0% Jul 29 '96 Aug 4 '96 Lewis,PRE Clerical 263 MR Submit report to Attorney for review 0% Aug 12 '96 Aug 12'96 Jackson 264 MR Prepare for publications the 4th Quarter Program Budget Document Reports 0% Aug 16 '96 Aug 19 '96 Lewis Page 33 FY97 November 30 '95ID 265 Code MR Name_________________________ Submit 4th Quarter Program Budget Document Reports to Court Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool % Complete 0% Scheduled Start Aug 22 '96 Scheduled Finish Aug 22 '96 Revised Finish Resource Names Jackson ,Attorney 266 MR Primary leaders provide feedback to their secondary people regarding achievement reporting in the PBD 0% Aug 1 '96 Aug 31 '96 Primary Leaders 267 MR PRE house diskettes as 1996-97 school year begins 0% Jun 16 '96 Aug 22 '96 Lewis 268 MR SUBMIT MONTHLY MANAGEMENT REPORT IMANAGEMENT lOflU IQ CQUBI 38% Jul 31 '95 Aug 31 '96 Jackson 269 MR Submit July's monthly management report to Court 100% Jul 31 '95 Jul 31 '95 Jackson,Attorney 270 MR Submit August's monthly management report to Court 100% Aug 31 '95 Aug 31 '95 Jackson,Attorney 271 MR Submit September's monthly management report to Court 100% Sep 29 '95 Sep 29 '95 Jackson,Attorney 272 MR Submit October's monthly management report to Court 100% Oct 31 '95 Oct 31 '95 Jackson,Attorney Page 34 FY97 November 30 '95 7Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 273 Code MR Name Submit November's monthly management report to Court % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Nov 30 '95 Scheduled Finish Nov 30 '95 Revised Finish Resource Names Jackson.Attorney 274 MR Submit December's monthly management report to Court 0% Dec 21 '95 Dec 21 '95 Jackson .Attorney 275 MR Submit January's monthly management report to Court 0% Jan 31 '96 Jan 31 '96 Jackson .Attorney 276 MR Submit February's monthly management report to Court 0% Feb 29 '96 Feb 29 '96 Jackson .Attorney 277 MR Submit March's monthly management report to Court 0% Mar 29 '96 Mar 29 '96 Jackson.Attorney 278 MR Submit April's monthly management report to Court 0% Apr 30 '96 Apr 30 '96 Jackson.Attorney 279 MR Submit May's monthly management report to Court 0% May 31 '96 May 31 '96 Jackson.Attorney 280 MR Submit June's monthly management report to Court 0% Jun 28 '96 Jun 28 '96 Jackson.Attorney Page 35 FY97 November 30 '95Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ID 281 Code MR Name Submit July's monthly management report to Court % Complete 0% Scheduled Start Jul 31 '96 Scheduled Finish Jul 31 '96 Revised Finish Resource Names Jackson .Attorney 282 MR Submit August's monthly management report to Court 0% Aug 31 '96 Aug 31 '96 Jackson 283 ORG Jul. 5 '95 Aug 30 '96 Jackson.Attorney 284 ORG Analyze, reassess, and revise planning organization and structure 10% Jul 5 '95 Jul 28 '96 Williams,Jackson 285 ORG Revise, discuss and reach consensus regarding format and tasking of 1996-97 Management Tool 100% Jul 5 '95 Jul 24 '95 Cabinet.Lewis. Jackson 286 ORG Initial circulation of 1996-97 Management Tool 100% Jul 13'95 Jul 31 '95 Lewis.Jackson 287 ORG Evaluate tasking of 1996-97 Management Tool 15% Jul 24 '95 Aug 30 '96 Cabinet.Lewis Page 36 FY97 November 30 '95 7Quarter 1 st Quarter ID 1 Code PINV Name % Complete 100% May I Jun~ Jul | Aug | Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov' Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May 1 Jun 1 st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2n Oct 2 PINV Identify and revise DSeg and NonDSeg Programs 100% 3 PINV Review and adjust primary and secondary leaders for DSeg and NonDSeg Programs 100% 4 PINV Finalize list of DSeg and NonDSeg Programs 100% I 5 e 7 PINV PEVAL PEVAL Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Generate a Program Inventory Report for 1995-96 Notify program managers that program evaluation begins in fall\nbegin data collection Critical Noncritical 100% 100% 100% Progress h Milestone | Summary Rolled Up Page 1ID 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Code PEVAL PEVAL PEVAL PEVAL PEVAL PEVAL PEVAL PEVAL Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Name Review/revise process for cabinet review of program evaluations Review/revise program evaluation instrument Distribute program evaluation instruments and instructions to primary and/or secondary leaders: provide additonal information/instruments, if needed Conduct required training sessions describing the process and evaluation criteria for designated staff Program evaluations due from secondary or primary leaders Review program evaluations (DSeg and NonDSeg) for potential target programs for extended evaluations Finalize identification of extended evaluation targets Notify appropriate staff to prepare Extended Program Evaluations Critical Noncritical % Complete 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Quarter May I Jur? 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep H I I 4 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec H I 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2n Oct Progress h Milestone Summary Rolled Up Q Page 2ID 16 17 Ifi 19 20 21 22 Code PEVAL PEVAL NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Name Extended evaluations due Cabinet review extended evaluations for merge into needs assessment report Review types of data to measure needs of district for FY 96-97 Analyze results of the budgeting and planning priorities revealed from the 94-95 Needs Assessment Report Review strategic planning mission statement and goals of the District (and implement) Board identifies District concerns for input from public at Town Hall/District Dialogues Critical Noncritical % Complete 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Quarter May I Jut? 1 st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep B B B 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov' I I Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1 st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2n Oct Progress m Milestone Summary Rolled Up Page 3Quarter ID 22 24 25 26 27 28 29 Code tlEECS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Name STANFORD 8 TEST DATA STUDY Define purpose and scope for Stanford 8 Test data study Assign responsibilities for study of Stanford 8 Test data Design data collection plan for study of Stanford Collect and analyze data from Stanford 8 Test (Spring 95 administration) Prepare Stanford 8 Test Report Submit Stanford 8 Test Report to PRE for merge into needs assessment Critical Noncritical 1st Quarter % Complete 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% May I Jun~ Jul | Aug | Sep I I I 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter 2n Jul I Aug I Sep Oct Progress m Milestone Summary Rolled Up Q Page 4 7ID Sfl Code NEEDS Name PRE EDUCATIONAL EQUITY MONITORING REPORTS SURVEY % Complete 100% Quarter May I Jun 1 st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov~ Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1 st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2n Oct 31 32 33 34 35 as NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Define purpose and scope for PRE Educational Equity Monitoring Reports Study Assign responsibilities for PRE Educational Equity Monitoring Reports Study Analyze data from PRE Educational Equity Monitoring Reports Studies Prepare PRE Educational Equity Monitoring findings Submit PRE Educational Equity Monitoring Reports Study to PRE for merge into needs assessment listing SCHOOL CLIMATE/HUMAN RELATIONS SURVEY (SC/HRISTUDY Critical Noncritical 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Progress h Milestone Page 5 I I B Summary Rolled Up ID 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 Code NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Name Define purpose and scope of SC/HR Survey Assign responsibilities for SC/HR data collections Design data collection plan for study of SC/HR Collect and analyze data from SC/HR Survey Prepare SC/HR Survey Report Submit SC/HR Survey Report to PRE for merge into needs assessment PQPPQRTIQNALS ALLOCATION FORMULAS STUDY Define purpose and scope of Proportional Allocation Formulas Critical Noncritical Quarter % Complete 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1st Quarter May I Jun Jul [ Aug | Sep I I I 2nd Quarter Ocd I Nov I Dec I 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar 4th Quarter | 1 st Quarter Apr I May | Jun Jul | Aug | Sep 2n Oct Progress h Milestone Summary Rolled Up Page 6 7 Quarter ID 45 46 47 48 49 SQ 51 52 Code NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Name 1 st Quarter Assign responsibilities for Proportional Allocation Formulas Design data collections plan for Proportional Allocation Formulas Collect and analyze data for Proportional Allocation Formulas Prepare Proportional Allocation Formulas Report Submit Proportional Allocations Formulas Study Report to PRE for merge into needs assessment listing DISTRICTWIDE FACILITIES STUDY Define purpose and scope of Districtwide Facilities Study/Report from 1994-95 Study for purposes of 1995-96 Needs Assessment Report Assign responsibilities for the Districtwide Facilities Study/Reporting of findings Critical Noncritical % Complete 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% May I Jun~ Jul | Aug | Sep I I I I i 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov' I Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2n Oct Progress h Milestone Summary Rolled Up Page 7ID 53 54 5 56 57 58 59 60 Code NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Name Prepare findings from the Districtwide Facilities Study Submit Districtwide Facilities Study Report recommendations to PRE for merge into needs assessment report (recommendations cited in this report are subject to change) DESEGREGATION MONITORING REPORTS AUDIT FROM PPM Define purpose and scope of Desegregation Monitoring Reports Audit Assign responsibility for data collection of transcripts and Desegregation Monitoring Reports Audit Design data collection plan for study of Desegregation Monitoring Reports Audit Collect data Review with Cabinet and Attorneys Critical Noncritical % Complete 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Quarter May I Jun 1st Quarter Jul Progress m Milestone | 2nd Quarter I Aug I Se^ Oct | Nov | Dec I I I Summary Rolled Up n 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar ~Apr | May | Jun I I Page 8 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2n OctID 61 62 3 64 65 66 67 68 Code NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Name Report findings to PRE Merge new obligations with Program Budget Document COURT ORDERS AUDIT Define purpose and scope of Court Orders Audit Assign responsibility for data collection of Court Orders Audit Collect data Review with Cabinet and Attorneys Report findings to PRE Critical Noncritical % Complete 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Quarter May I Jun 1 st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep I I 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov\" H I Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2n Oct Progress h Milestone | Summary Rolled Up Q Page 9ID 69 22 71 72 73 74 75 76 Code NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Name Merge new obligations with Program Budget Document TOWN HALL MEETINGS Define purpose and scope of Town Hall Meetings Review previous years data from Town Hall Report Review and data collection plan (matrix)forTown Hall Meetings Set locations and schedule for Town Hall Meeting Develop advertisement plan and schedule for Town Hall Meetings\nPrepare sample agenda Execute advertisement plan for Town Hall Meeting I Critical Noncritical % Complete 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Quarter May I Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep I I I I I 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov~ Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar 1 Progress hi Milestone | Summary Rolled Up Page 10 4th Quarter | 1st Quarter Apr I May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep 2n OctID 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 Code NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Name Conduct Town Hall Meeting I Gather feedback data from Town Hall Meeting I for input into matrix Execute advertisement plan for Town Hall Meeting II Conduct Town Hall Meeting II Gather feedback data from Town Hall Meeting II for input info matrix Execute advertisement plan for Town Hall Meeting III Conduct Town Hall Meeting III Finalize and publish Town Hall Meeting Report Critical . Noncritical % Complete 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% i Quarter May I Jut? 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov~ I Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2n Oct Progress m Milestone | Summary Rolled Up Q Page 11ID 85 87 88 89 90 91 92 Code NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Name Merge findings of Town Hall Meeting Report, 1995-96 into needs assessment listing % Complete 100% 100% Define purpose and scope of District Dialogues Review previous years data from District Dialogue Report Review data collection plan (matrix) for District Dialogues Set locations and schedule for District Dialogue Meetings Develop advertisement plan and schedule for District Dialogues\nprepare sample agenda Execute advertisement plan for District Dialogue l(Principals) Critical Noncritical 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Quarter May I Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep I I I I I 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec Jan | Feb | Mar tauH I I i 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2n Oct Progress m Milestone | Summary Rolled Up Page 12ID 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 Code NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Name Conduct District Dialogue I Gather feedback from District Dialogue 1 tor input info matrix Execute advertisement plan for District Dialogue ll(Ass't Principals) Conduct District Dialogue II Gather feedback data from District Dialogue II for input into matrix Execute advertisement plan for District Dialogue lll(Teachers) Conduct District Dialogue III Gather feedback data from District Dialogue III for merge into matrix Critical Noncritical % Complete 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Quarter May I Jun 1 st Quarter 2nd Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep Oct | Nov I T Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1 st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep I I 2n Oct Progress h Milestone | Summary Rolled Up Page 13ID 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 Code NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Name Execute advertisement plan for District Dialogue IV(Admin. and Classified) Conduct District Dialogue IV Gather feedback data from District Dialogue IV for input into matrix Execute advertisement plan for District Dialogue V(Transportation) Conduct District Dialogue V Gather feedback data from District Dialogue V for input info matrix Finalize and publish District Dialogue Report 1995-96 Merge findings of District Dialogue Report 1995-96 into needs assessment listing Critical Noncritical % Complete 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Quarter May I Jun 1 st Quarter 2nd Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep Oct | Nov | Dec H I i 3rd Quarter Jan [ Feb | Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun I I 1 st Quarter 2n Jul I Aug I Sep Oct Progress mi Milestone Summary Rolled Up Q Page 14 7ID 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 Code MEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS GOALS GOALS Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Name EBEEABE NEEDS ASSESSMENT REPORT Conduct Administrative review of available districtwide reports and objective data Review of available districtwide reports and objective data by Board Publish Draft of Needs Assessment /Report and disseminate to selected persons Publish Needs Assessment Report, 1995-96 PLANNING AND BUDGET GOALS CABINET PLANNING SESSION Critical Noncritical % Complete 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 39% Quarter | 1 st Quarter May I Jun 1 Jul | Aug | Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec H H 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb [ Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1 st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2n Oct 1 Progress h Milestone Summary Rolled Up Q Page 15ID 116 Code GOALS Name Review 1994-95 Needs Assessment Report % Complete 100% Quarter May I Jun 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep Oct | Nov I Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar 4th Quarter 1st Quarter Apr I May | Jun Jul | Aug | Sep 2n Oct 117 GOALS Distribute 1995-96 Needs Assessment Report to Cabinet members 0% 3 118 GOALS Distribute District goals to Cabinet 0% 3 119 120 121 122 123 GOALS GOALS GOALS GOALS GOALS Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Cabinet review of goals BOARD WORK SESSION Establish date and site for Work Session Identify materials for Board Work Session Prepare materials for Board Work Session Critical Noncritical 0% 51% 100% 100% 100% Progress h Milestone | Page 16 E B I I I Summary Rolled Up 1 IID 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 Code GOALS GOALS GOALS GOALS GOALS GOALS GOALS GOALS Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Name Conduct Board Work Session Distribute background materials to Board members Review/revise mission statement and goals (review Strategic Planning mission statement) Review DSeg and NonDSeg Program Inventory Review identified proportional allocations Establish written priorities Identify strategies for funding shortfalls Develop timeline for identification and researching of funding shortfall strategies Critical Noncritical % Complete 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Quarter May I Jun 1 1 st Quarter 2nd Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep ~Oct | Nov Dec 0 0 0 B 0 0 0 0 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb [ Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1 1 st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2n Oct Progress n Milestone Summary Rolled Up Page 17ID 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 Code GOALS GOALS GOALS GOALS GOALS GOALS GOALS GOALS Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Name Develop communication strategy for mission statement and goals Distribute mission statement and goals Distribute list of priorities BOARD RETREAT Determine date and site for Board Retreat Identify agenda items for Board Retreat Establish agenda for Board Retreat Identity materials for Board Retreat Critical Noncritical % Complete 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Quarter May I Jun I i 1 st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov Dec I I I 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb [ Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2n Oct Progress h Milestone Summary Rolled Up Page 18ID 140 Code GOALS Name Distribute materials for Board Retreat % Complete 0% Quarter May I Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar 4th Querter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2n Oct 141 142 143 144 145 146 GOALS GOALS GOALS PDEV PDEV PDEV Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Conduct data analysis work session in preparation for Board Retreat Conduct Board Retreat Report outcomes of Board Retreat SUBMIT BUSINESS CASE FOR PROGRAM AND/OR MODIFICATIONS TO SUPERINTENDENT Review process for program development Critical Noncritical 0% 0% 0% 11% 51% 100% Progress h Milestone | Summary Rolled Up Q Page 19 SID 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 Code PDEV PDEV PDEV PDEV PDEV PDEV PDEV BUDGT Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Name Use extended program evaluations to identify program additions, modifications, deletions Notify appropriate staff to prepare Business Cases on results of extended program evaluations Review recommendations from district needs assessment report in order to identify additional programs or programs modifications resulting in business case(s) Business Cases due Review of Business Cases by Cabinet Submit Business Cases for program and/or program modifications to Board of Directors Review of Business Cases by Board BUDGETING Critical Noncritical % Complete 100% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5% Quarter May I Jun i 1 st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov Dec I I 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar I I 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1 st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2n Oct Progress h Milestone | Summary Rolled Up Q Page 20ID 155 Code BUDGT Name Develop budget preparation training materials % Complete 100% Quarter May I Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1 st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2n Oct 156 BUDGT Conduct budget preparation training sessions and distribute instructions for budget preparation training at all levels 100% I 157 BUDGT Budget managers develop and submit revised 1995-96 expense budget revisions and 1996-97 expense budget requests 0% 158 BUDGT Begin districtwide expense budget consolidation and executive review process 0% 159 BUDGT Year to date revenue expenditure analysis 0% 160 BUDGT Revise financial forecast for coming year 0% 0 161 BUDGT Submit proposed budget to Board 0% I 162 BUDGT Conduct Board Work Sessions on proposed budget 0% Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Critical Noncritical Progress Milestone Summary Rolled Up Page 21ID 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 Code BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Name Revise proposed budget, as needed Prepare tentative budget Board review of tentative budget Conduct Board Work Session on tentative Budget Account reconciliation and Purchase Order (PO) clean-up Receipt of state generated revenue numbers (payroll liabilities, adjusted supplemental payroll, last payroll, Carl Perkins, M to M, JTPA, Vocational Ed., Chapters 1 and 2, Compensatory Ed., MFPA,_______ Close-out 1995-96 accounts: adjust physical inventory, (fiscal)federal grants, magnet, state grants, accruals Compute ending fund balance Critical Noncritical Quarter 1 st Quarter % Complete 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% May [ Jun~ Jul | Aug | Sep i 2nd Quarter Oct [ Nov I Dec 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar Apr | May | Jun I 0 1st Quarter Jul [ Aug I Sep I 2n Oct Progress m Milestone | Summary Rolled Up Page 22ID 171 Code BUDGT Name Administrative review of final budget % Complete 0% Quarter May I Jut? 1 st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb 1 Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1 st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2n Oct 172 BUDGT Submit final budget to Board 0% 173 BUDGT Board review and adoption of 96-97 final budget 0% 0 174 BUDGT Submit final Budget to Court/Parties 0% 175 BUDGT Submit 96-97 final budget to State 0% 0 12fi BUDGT Staffing 0% 177 BUDGT First review of changes in course offerings by Board 0% 178 BUDGT Meeting with counselors and principals to review courses offerings 1995-96 0% Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Critical Noncritical Progress h Milestone Summary Rolled Up Page 23ID 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 Code BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Name Print secondary course selection sheets Counselors meet with students and complete course selection sheets Counselors send course selection sheets to receiving schools Registrars tally course selections Review course tallies secondary. Note possible staffing changes based on courses requested Identify elementary enrollment (tentative) for 1995-96 Make determination by subject area (secondary) of possible changes and by projected elementary enrolled List known retirements, resignations, and intern positions i Critical Noncritical % Complete 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Quarter May I Jun 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep Oct | Nov | Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar 0 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun Progress Milestone H Summary Rolled Up Q Page 24 1st Quarter | 2n Jul I Aug I Sep OcTID 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 Code BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT BUDG BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Name Identify certified personnel for Reduction in Force (RIF), if needed Notify certified personnel of Reduction in Force (RIF), if needed staff reduction Recall certified personnel from RIF, if needed Notify classified personnel of staff reduction Recall classified personnel from RIF, if needed PROVIDE BRQAD-BASED INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL FEEDBACK Plan for internal and external feedback. Set locations and dates Execute advertisement for district feedback. Session I Critical % Complete 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Quarter May I Jun 1 st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov\" Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 0 1 st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2n Oct Progress m Milestone Summary Rolled Up Page 25ID 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 Code BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Name Conduct District Feedback Session I Execute advertisement plan for district feedback. Session II Conduct District Feedback Session II Execute advertisement for district feedback. Session III Conduct district feedback. Session III Execute advertisement plan for Town Hall feedback, Session I Conduct Town Hall feedback. Session I Execute advertisement plan for Town Hall feedback, Session II Critical Noncritical % Complete 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Quarter May I Jur? 1 st Quarter 2nd Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep Oct | Nov I PeF 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar ~Apr | May | Jur? J. 1st Quarter 2n Jul I Aug I Sep Oct Progress h Milestone | Summary Rolled Up Q Page 26ID 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 Code BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT MR MR MR MR MR Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Name Conduct Town Hall feedback , Session II Execute advertisement for Town Hall feedback. Session III Conduct Town Hall feedback. Session III MONITORING AND REPORTING OF DESEG AND NONDESEG PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT REPORTS (1ST QUARTER: 2ND QUARTER: 3RD QUARTER: 4TH QUARTERI PRE performs necessary diskette management functions for the summer ( i.e. archival filing, achievement erasures, copying, etc.) Revise written program budget document instructions, as needed PRE forward program budget document diskettes to principals and program managers Distribute written program budget document instructions to principals and program managers Critical Noncritical % Complete 0% 0% 0% 36% 100% 100% 100% 100% Quarter May I Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep I I I 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov J Dec 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar ~Apr | May | Jun 1 st Quarter 2n Jul I Aug I Sep Oct i Progress H Milestone Summary Rolled Up Q Page 27ID 211 Code MR Name Plan maintenance education and orientation regarding the program budget document process % Complete 100% Quarter May I Jun 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep Oct | Nov Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2n Oct 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 MR MB MR MR MR MR MR Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Conduct maintenance education workshops and orientation sessions regarding the program budget document process for principals, clerical staff, program managers, primary and secondary leaders 1ST QUARTER PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT REPORTS Review program budget document with program managers and principals Generate diskette management flow information to relative staff School Operations and PRE office Carryout training sessions on the Program Budget Document and WordPerfect Send reminder notice regarding deadline for submission of 1 st Quarter PBD diskettes DSeg and NonDSeg diskettes returned to PRE Critical Noncritical 100% 86% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Progress H Milestone | H I Summary Rolled Up Page 28 IID 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 Code MR MR MR MR MR MR MR MR Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Name PRE performs check-in procedures and data clean-up on diskettes PRE generate hard copies of diskettes PRE develops narrative and the Controller provides financial info for the PBD reports PRE combines all information for the 1st Quarter Program Budget Report Submit report to Attorney for review Prepare for publication of 1st Quarter Program Budget Document Reports Submit 1st Quarter Program Budget Document Reports to Court Return diskettes and hard copies to managers and principals Critical Noncritical % Complete 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Quarter May I Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec ^9 B B I I I I 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun i 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2n Oct Progress m Milestone | Summary Rolled Up Page 29ID 227 22a 229 230 231 232 233 234 Code MR MB MR MR MR MR MR MR Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Name Primary leaders provide feedback to the secondary people regarding achievement reporting in the PBD 2ND QUARTER PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT REPORTS Advise program managers and principals on Programs Budget Document Send reminder notice regarding deadline for submission of 2nd Quarter PBD diskettes Diskettes due back to PRE PRE performs check-in procedures and data clean-up on diskettes PRE generates hard copies of diskettes PRE revises narrative and the controller provides financial info for Program Budget Document Reports (DSeg and NonDSeg) Critical Noncritical % Complete 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Quarter May I Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb [ Mar I I 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1 st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2n Oct Progress h Milestone | Summary Rolled Up Page 30ID 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 Code MR MR MR MR MR MR MR MR Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Name PRE combines all revised infomiation for 2nd Quarter Program Budget Document Reports Submit report to Attorney for review Prepare publication of 2nd Quarter Program Budget Document Reports Submit 2nd Quarter Program Budget Document Reports to Court Return diskettes and paper copies to principals and program managers Primary leaders provide feedback to their secondary people regarding achievement reporting in the PBD 3RD QUARTER PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT REPORTS Advise program managers and principals on the Program Budget Document Critical Noncritical % Complete 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Quarter May I Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov J Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun a 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep i 2n Oct Progress h Milestone Summary Rolled Up Page 31ID 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 Code MR MR MR MR MR MR MR MR Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Name Send reminder notice regarding deadline for submission of 3rd Quarter PBD diskettes Diskettes due back to PRE PRE performs check-in procedures and data clean-up on diskettes PRE generate hard copies of diskettes PRE revises narrative and the controller provides financial information for 3rd Quarter Program Budget Document Reports PRE combines all revised information for 3rd Quarter PBD Reports Submit report to Attorney for review Prepare publication of 3rd Quarter Program Budget Document Reports Critical Noncritical % Complete 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Quarter May I Jun 1 st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep i 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3rd Quarter Jan [ Feb | Mar I 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun I Q Q 0 0 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2n Oct Progress M Milestone | Summary Rolled Up Q Page 32ID 251 252 253 \u0026amp; 255 256 257 258 Code MR MR MR MR MR MR MR MR Project: FY 96 Date. 11/30/95 Name Submit 3rd Quarter Program Budget Document to Court Return diskettes and paper copies to principals and program managers Primary leaders provide feedback to their secondary people regarding achievement reporting in the PBD 4th QUARTER PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT REPORTS Advise program managers and principals on Program Budget Document Send reminder notice for completing the PBD to principals and program managers Principals submit School Operations Diskettes to Asst. Supts. Diskettes due from Program Managers who are on a less than 12 month contract Critical Noncritical % Complete 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Quarter May I Jun 1 1 st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep i 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 0 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 0 0 2n Oct Progress Milestone Summary Rolled Up Q Page 33ID 259 Code MR Name All Program diskettes due back to PRE % Complete 0% Quarter May I Jun 1 st Quarter Jul I Aug [ Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1 st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2n Oct 260 MR PRE performs check-in procedures and data clean-up 0% 261 MR PRE develops narrative and the controller provides financial information for 4th quarter Program Budget Document Reports 0% 262 MR PRE combines all information for 4th Quarter Program Budget Document Reports 0% 0 263 MR Submit report to Attorney for review 0% I 264 MR Prepare for publications the 4th Quarter Program Budget Document Reports 0% 0 265 MR Submit 4th Quarter Program Budget Document Reports to Court 0% I 266 MR Primary leaders provide feedback to their secondary people regarding achievement reporting in the PBD 0% Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Critical Noncritical Progress - Milestone | Summary Rolled Up Q Page 34ID 267 Code MR Name PRE house diskettes as 1996-97 school year begins % Complete 0% Quarter 1 st Quarter | 2nd Quarter May I Jun Jul | Aug | Sep Oct | Nov 3rd Quarter Dec Jan | Feb | Ma? 4th Quarter [ 1st Quarter [ Apr I May | Jun Jul [ Aug | Sep | 2fifi MR SUBMIT MONTHLY MANAGEMENT BEEQBT (MANAGEMENT TOOLI TO COURT 38% 269 270 271 272 273 274 MR MR MR MR MR MR Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Submit July's monthly management report to Court Submit August's monthly management report to Court Submit Septembers monthly management report to Court Submit October's monthly management report to Court Submit November's monthly management report to Court Submit December's monthly management report to Court Critical Noncritical 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 0% Progress Milestone I I I Summary Rolled Up Page 35 2n Oct I f I IID 275 Code MR Name Submit January's monthly management report to Court % Complete 0% Quarter May I Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov~ Dec 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar ~Apr | May | Jun I 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2n Oct 276 MR Submit February's monthly management report to Court 0% I 277 278 279 280 281 282 MR MR MR MR MR MR Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Submit March's monthly management report to Court Submit April's monthly management report to Court Submit May's monthly management report to Court Submit June's monthly management report to Court Submit July's monthly management report to Court Submit August's monthly management report to Court Critical Noncritical 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Progress m Milestone Summary Rolled Up Page 36 I I I I IQuarter ID 283 284 285 286 287 Code ORG ORG ORG ORG ORG Project: FY 96 Date: 11/30/95 Name REASSESSMENT OF PROCESS AND ORGANIZATION 1996-97 Analyze, reassess, and revise planning organization and structure Revise, discuss and reach consensus regarding format and tasking of 1996-97 Management Tool Initial circulation of 1996-97 Management Tool Evaluate tasking of 1996-97 Management Tool Critical Noncritical 1st Quarter % Complete 17% 10% 100% 100% 15% May I Jun~ Jul | Aug | Sep s 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2n Oct Progress Milestone Summary Rolled Up Q Page 37\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"noa_sohpcr_q-0002","title":"Oral history interview with Floyd Alston Jr., November 29, 1995","collection_id":"noa_sohpcr","collection_title":"Oral Histories of the American South: The Civil Rights Movement","dcterms_contributor":["McCoy, James Eddie (James Edward), 1942-","Alston, Ethel Thorpe, 1916-","Southern Oral History Program"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, North Carolina, Granville County, 36.30402, -78.65302"],"dcterms_creator":["Alston, Floyd, 1933-"],"dc_date":["1995-11-29"],"dcterms_description":["Granville County, North Carolina, residents Floyd Alston (in his sixties in 1995) and his mother, Ethel Thorpe Alston, remember their lives in the area in this interview. Floyd and Ethel trace their family lines, some of which lead to slaves, others to sharecroppers, some to brothers and sisters who died, still others to factory workers. This interview offers more information on the Alston and Thorpe families than it does about African Americans' lives in the rural South generally, but it does offer some revealing insights into racial identity and the struggles of post-emancipation African Americans to find economic and social security.","The Civil Rights Digital Library received support from a National Leadership Grant for Libraries awarded to the University of Georgia by the Institute of Museum and Library Services for the aggregation and enhancement of partner metadata."],"dc_format":["text/html","text/xml","audio/mpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":["Forms part of Oral histories of the American South collection."],"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["African American men--North Carolina--Granville County","African American women--North Carolina--Granville County","African American families--North Carolina--Granville County","African Americans--North Carolina--Granville County--Social life and customs"],"dcterms_title":["Oral history interview with Floyd Alston Jr., November 29, 1995"],"dcterms_type":["Text","Sound"],"dcterms_provenance":["University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Documenting the American South (Project)"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://docsouth.unc.edu/sohp/Q-0002/menu.html"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["transcripts","sound recordings","oral histories (literary works)"],"dcterms_extent":["Title from menu page (viewed on Nov. 14, 2008).","Interview participants: Floyd Alston Jr., interviewee; Ethel Thorpe Alston, interviewee; Eddie McCoy, interviewer.","Duration: 00:58:50.","This electronic edition is part of the UNC-Chapel Hill digital library, Documenting the American South.","It is a part of the collection Oral histories of the American South.","Text encoded by Jennifer Joyner.","Sound recordings digitized by Aaron Smithers."],"dlg_subject_personal":["Alston, Floyd, 1933-","Alston, Ethel Thorpe, 1916-"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"pth_bcja_metapth611393","title":"Remarks by Barbara Jordan, Chair, U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform, to the Immigration and Naturalization Service","collection_id":"pth_bcja","collection_title":"Barbara C. Jordan Archives","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Texas, 31.25044, -99.25061"],"dcterms_creator":["Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996"],"dc_date":["1995-11-28"],"dcterms_description":["Text for a speech given by Barbara C. Jordan, as chair of the U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform, to the Immigration and Naturalization Service, speaking of the work of her commission in the area of immigration."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":["local-cont-no: TSOU_0459-001-005"],"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":["ark: ark:/67531/metapth611393"],"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["ark: ark:/67531/metapth611393"],"dcterms_subject":["African American women politicians--Texas","Speeches, addresses, etc.","U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform","United States. Immigration and Naturalization Service","Emigration and immigration--United States"],"dcterms_title":["Remarks by Barbara Jordan, Chair, U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform, to the Immigration and Naturalization Service","Texas Senate Papers"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Texas Southern University. Library"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth611393"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["speeches (documents)"],"dcterms_extent":["9 p. ; 28 cm."],"dlg_subject_personal":["Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_734","title":"Report: ''Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study Supplement to Executive Summary,'' 3D/International, Volume I","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1995-11-22"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational statistics"],"dcterms_title":["Report: ''Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study Supplement to Executive Summary,'' 3D/International, Volume I"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/734"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nreceived FEB 29 199 Office of Desegregation Monitoring Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study Supplement to Executive Summary Revisions based on 1995 enrollment and various modifications to tables and cost data. Recommendations remain unchanged November 22,1995 Volume No 1 Prepared By: 3D/ International Facilities Master Planning, Program Management, Engineering, Strategic Planning, Architecture \u0026lt;S Interior Architecture Educational Planning Consultants Educational Consultants The Grier Partnership Demographers112 Easl Pecan Streel. Suite 2350 San Antonio, Texas 78205 Telephone 210/227-2500 Fax 210/227-9704 November 22, 1995 Little Rock School District Subject: Supplement to the Executive Summary Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study The following documents represent changes to tables provided in the August 30, 1995 Executive Summary to the Facilities Master Plan Study. In addition, certain new tables have been added which reflect enrollment impact on the middle school concept as well as readjustment of enrollment projections based on the actual 1995 enrollment. These documents are being provided in this bound form and should be substituted for the previously provided tables issued report. in Volume 1 of the I 9 3D International Central Region Tab_______ Cost Factor Table CST-1 CST-3 CST-4 CST-5 CST-6 Action Replace Replace Replace Replace Replace a Demographic Study Analysis of 1994-1995 Enrollment Projections New Document Educational Study Table 4A and 4B Table 5 Table 6 Table 7 Table ES-1 Table ES-3 Table ES-4 Table ES-7 (95) Table ES-8 (95) Replace Replace Replace Replace Replace Replace Replace New Document New Document Attendance Zone AZ-1 Replace Based on the 1995 enrollment and a review of the projections, no substantial change were encountered that would alter the recommendations set out in Volume 1. Very truly yours, Barbara Trammell Project AdministratorIN ij IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT O EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS s' I WESTERN DIVISION district court eastern district ARKANSAS I LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FEB 2 81996 PLAINTIFF JAMES W McCORiVirtGK, CLER By------------- - V. LR-C-82-866 OEP CL. I PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS I MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS NOTICE OF FILING I The Little Rock School District hereby gives notice of the I1 filing of the attached \"Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study Supplement to Executive Summary. H Respectfully submitted. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT I N FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Street Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 By: Christopher Helled It I Bar No. 81083 L CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Notice of Filing has been served on the following people by depositing copy of same in the United States mail on this 28th day of February 1996: Mr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026amp; Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell and Streett First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Timothy G. Gauger Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Christopher Heller Cost FactorCOST SUMMARY OF BUILDINGS Renovation and Repair, Existing Buildings Little Rock School District TYPE OF SCHOOL NO NAME TOTAL BASE COST 1995 PRIORITY 1 1-2 Years 1995-1997 PRIORITY 2 3 Years 1998 HIGH SCHOOLS 1 CENTRAL (Main Building) (Gymnasium) (Library) (Quigley Stadium) Subtotal Central $4,790,209 $290,617 $201,263 $481,629 $5,763,718 $2,942,332 $77,225 $51,905 $153,017 $3,224,480 $922,092 $172,597 $10,158 $69,536 $1,174,383 2 McClellan 3 J.A.FAIR 4 HALL 5 PARKVIEW (Building 1) (Building 2) (Buildirtg 3) Subtotal Parkview TOTAL HIGH SCHOOLS VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL 6 METROPOLITAN TOTAL VTS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 7 CLOVERDALE 8 DUNBAR 9 FOREST HEIGHTS 10 HENDERSON 11 MABELVALE 12 MANN MAGNET (Building #1) (Building #2) 13 PULASKI HEIGHTS (Building #1) ___________________(Building #2) (Building #3) 14 SOUTHWEST TOTAL JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 15 ALTERNATE LEARNING CENTER ALC TOTAL ALC Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I Table CST-1 PRIORITY 3 3-5 Years 98-2001 $172,319 $7,328 $3,618 $162,128 $345,393 PRIORITY 4 5-10 Years 2001-2008 SO $33,467 $0 $0 $33,467 PRIORITY 5 10-15 Years 2006-2011 $753,466 $0 $135,580 $96,948 $965,994 PRIORITY TOTALS No Escalation $4,790,209 $290,617 $201,263 $481,629 $5,763,718 DIST SITE NO 1 $3,489,032 $1,725,309 $2,182,064 $724,389 $24,087 $89,396 $837,872 $13,997,995 $3,488,387 $3,488,387 $687,389 $3,855,668 $2,410,310 $845,431 $2,263,241 $930,224 $484,276 $926,119 $74,076 $619,988 $1,483,632 $14,580,354 I $1,183,270 $1,183,270 $579,059 $411,771 $453,800 $8,690 $0 $0 $8,690 $4,677,800 $412,381 $412,381 $228,836 $1,476,235 $822,810 $219,472 $277,011 $99,054 $21,565 $43,756 $12,890 $233,662 $18,690 $3,453,981 $415,614 $415,614 $1,397,303 $235,246 $800,095 $314,469 $24,087 $19,621 $358,177 $3,965,204 $505,588 $505,588 $73,850 $533,350 $632,646 $105,642 $819,091 $70,719 $348,274 $379,487 $12,786 $120,624 $468,791 $3,565,459 $474,524 $474,524 $1,078,795 $454,968 $404,394 $967 SO so $967 $2.284,516 $1,567,873 $1,567,873 $228,017 $1,442,690 $722,897 $191,157 $944,741 $328,736 $37,185 $211,865 $11,088 $35,202 $548,199 $4,701,777 $133,401 $133,401 $16,586 $77,696 $0 $0 so $0 $0 $129,750 $3,567 $3,567 $0 $86,423 $8,415 $0 $24,526 $125,146 $26,257 $111,557 $5,211 $220,540 $182,264 $790,338 $40,658 $40,658 $415,286 $545,629 $523,775 $400,263 $0 $69,775 $470,038 $2.940.722 $3,489,032 $1,725,309 $2,182,064 $724,389 $24,087 $89,396 $637,872 $13,997,995 12 6 2 5 $996,969 $998,969 $156,684 $316,970 $223,542 $326,960 $197,872 $306,569 $50,996 $179,454 $32,101 $9,960 $265,689 $2.068,798 $119,074 $119,074 $3,488,367 $3,488,387 $687,389 $3,855,668 $2,410,310 $645,431 $2,263,241 $930,224 $484,276 $926,119 $74,076 $619,968 $1,483.632 14,580,354 $1,183,270 $1,183,270 Table CST-1 Page 1 4 15 7 9 13 16 3 10 11 14COST SUMMARY OF BUILDINGS Renovation and Repair, Existing Buildings Little Rock School District TYPE OF SCHOOL NO NAME ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS 16 BADGETT TOTAL BASE COST 1995 $666,504 17 BALE $1,200,466 18 BASELINE $1,111,915 19 BOOKER MAGNET $892,564 20 BRADY $476,919 21 CARVER MAGNET $378,889 22 CHICOT $0 23 CLOVERDALE $481,989 24 DAVID 0 DODD $954,119 25 FAIR PARK $714,626 26 FOREST PARK $752,687 27 FRANKLIN $1,845,175 28 FULBRIGHT $484,019 29 GARLAND $1,373,658 30 GEYER SPRINGS $321,017 31 GIBBS MAGNET $215,003 PRIORITY 1 1-2 Years 1995-1997 $145,216 $341,296 $156,719 $154,780 $220 $5,028 $0 $45,062 $12,275 $35,836 $91,391 $214,024 $26,102 $63,502 $36,857 $5,446 PRIORITY 2 3 Years 1998 $145,305 $423,784 $351,026 $25,820 $263,911 $121,554 $0 $56,127 $183,633 $538,790 $373,162 $626,040 $43,098 $620,356 $96,646 $12,684 Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I Table CST-1 PRIORITY 3 35 Years 98-2001 $279,738 $150,163 $402,280 $472,862 $76,076 $45,033 $0 $241,614 $474,315 $47,995 $190,839 $650,595 $129,202 $431,070 $51,671 $39,827 PRIORITY 4 5-10 Years 2001-2006 $21,651 $178,047 $8,001 $1,557 $0 $1,332 $0 $0 $127,580 $0 $0 $136,192 $71,761 $28,034 $2,588 $38,364 PRIORITY 5 10-15 Years 2006-2011 $74,594 $107,175 $193,889 $237,544 $136,712 $205,943 $0 $139,186 $156,315 $92,005 $97,295 $218,324 $213,856 $230,695 $133,255 $118,682 PRIORITY TOTALS No Escalation $666,504 $1,200,466 $1,111,915 $892,564 $476,919 $378,889 $0 $481,989 $954,119 $714,626 $752,687 $1,845,175 $484,019 $1,373,658 $321,017 $215,003 OIST SITE NO 19 17 22 6 18 21 27 31 32 23 24 25 48 26 37 27 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 ISH $656,776 $10,800 $328,091 $216,525 $0 JEFFERSON $1,814,531 $953,937 $601,600 $120,203 $0 MARTIN L KING MABELVALE MCDERMOTT MEADOWCLIFF MITCHELL MARTIN L KING OTTER CREEK PULASKI HEIGHTS RIGHTSELL ROCKEFELLER ROMINE TERRY WAKEFIELD WASHINGTON WATSON WESTERN HILLS WILLIAMS MAGNET WILSON WOODRUFF TOTAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION BUILDINGS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 $239,042 $1,568,674 $689,136 $1,138,095 $579,516 $239,042 $674,313 $1,389,146 $645,652 $399,444 $1,660,421 $498,742 $1,238,092 $313,822 $937,532 $850,067 $723,963 $933,698 $212,098 $29,271,352 $0 $334,844 $94,614 $71,174 $139,245 $0 $48,281 $302,995 $61,724 $133,487 $233,762 $96,792 $126,957 $7,807 $308,388 $89,413 $211,937 $23,358 $37,892 $4,621,163 $0 $474,776 $208,177 $921,415 $258,663 $0 $422,872 $429,235 $264,764 $11,695 $499,837 $194,583 $734,402 $7,206 $252,213 $304,581 $294,576 $440,444 $11,315 $10,542,382 $0 $561,070 $231,863 $27,798 $37,943 $0 $86,664 $175,058 $58,917 $48,492 $89,785 $60,406 $253,058 $12,597 $205,311 $316,702 $67,012 $198,818 $38,301 $6,489,803 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $650,913 $2,540 $4,489 $0 $0 $5,537 $0 $101,260 $3,476 $1,383,323 ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ANNEX CASHION BUILDING TRANSPORTATION PLANT SERVICES PURCHASING SAFETY/SECURITY TOTAL ADMINISTRATION SUBTOTAL SCHOOLS \u0026amp; ADMIN $597,648 $539,715 $117,330 $247,707 $498,894 $272,004 $387,874 $2,661,172 $65,182,530 $274,848 $54,724 $17,576 $47,649 $53,716 $41,951 $20,563 $511,026 $14,091,965 $110,770 $128,376 $1,981 $54,714 $19,625 $47,959 $126,004 $24,594 $172,268 $187,670 $32,380 $27,469 $113,938 $215,840 $115,296 $12,736 $39,574 $26,403 $313,590 $697,256 $19,750,412 $34,671 $812,769 $15,990,139 $759 $296,593 $2,644,228 $101,360 $138,791 $239,042 $197,984 $154,481 $117,708 $143,666 $239,042 $116,496 $481,858 $260,247 $205,770 $186,123 $144,419 $119,186 $286,212 $171,619 $133,834 $150,437 $169,818 $121,114 $6,234,682 $81,673 $70,339 $20,280 $25,425 $63,760 $63,760 $18,292 $343,530 $12,705,775 1 $656,776 $1,814,531 $239,042 $1,568,674 $689,136 $1,138,095 $579,516 $239,042 $674,313 $1,389,146 $645,652 $399,444 $1,660,421 $498,742 $1,238,092 $313,822 $937,532 $850,067 $723,963 $933,698 $212,098 $29,271,352 $597,648 $539,715 $117,330 $247,707 $498,894 $272,004 $387,874 $2,661,172 $65,182,531 Table CST-1 Page 2 49 30 35 46 20 33 34 35 10 38 39 50 40 47 51 42 32 29 43 44 45 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 I COST SUMMARY OF BUILDINGS Renovation and Repair, Existing Buildings Little Rock School District TYPE OF SCHOOL TOTAL BASE COST NO NAME DISTRICT ESTIMATES AOA COSTS ROOF REPLACEMENT ASBESTOS ABATEMENT TOTAL SCHOOLS \u0026amp; ADMIN ESCALATION IMPACT COST ESCALATION @ 4%/ YEAR ESCALATION DETAIL 1 1996 2 1997 3 1998 4 1999 5 2000 1995 $5,386,000 $3,452,000 $3,185,000 $77,205,530 $77,205,530 1 Year 1995 $3,088,221 $80,293,751 $3,088,221 $80,293,751 PRIORITY 1 1-2 Years 1995-1997 $1,386,000 $674,000 $1,587,000 $17,738,965 $17,738,965 1 -2 years 1995-1997 $1,447,500 $19,186,464 $709,559 $16,448,523 $737,941 $19,186,464 $767,459 $19,953,923 $798,157 $20,752,080 $830,083 $21,582,163 PRIORITY 2 3 Years 1998 $1,000,000 $261,000 $1,598,000 $22,609,412 $22,609,412 3 Years 1996 $2,823,102 $25,432,514 $904,376 $23,513,789 $940,552 $24,454,340 $978,174 $25,432,514 $1,017,301 $26,449,815 $1,057,993 $27,507,807 Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I Table CST-1 PRIORITY 3 3-5 Years 98-2001 $1,000,000 $406,000 $17,396,139 $17,396,139 3-5 Years 2000 $3,768,924 $21,165,063 $695,846 $18,091,985 $723,679 $18,815,664 $752,627 I $19,568,290 $782,732 $20,351,022 $814,041 $21,165,063 PRIORITY 4 5-10 Years 2001-2006 $1,000,000 $1,425,000 $5,069,228 $5,069,228 5-10 Years 2005 $2,434,468 $7,503,696 $202,769 $5,271,997 $210,880 $5,482,877 $219,315 $5,702,192 $228,088 $5,930,280 $237,211 $6,167,491 PRIORITY 5 10-15 Years 2006-2011 $1,000,000 $686,000 $0 $14,391,775 $14,391,775 10-15 Years 2010 $11,526,998 $25,918,773 $575,671 $14,967,446 $598,698 $15,566,143 $622,646 $16,188,789 $647,552 $16,836,341 $673,454 $17,509,794 PRIORITY TOTALS No Escalation $5,386,000 $3,452,000 $3,185,000 $77,205,530 $77,205,530 $22,000,991 $99,206,521 DIST SITE NO hl hl I + 6 2001 7 2002 8 2003 9 2004 10 2005 11 2006 n 12 2007 13 2008 Bl n Bl Bl 14 2009 15 2010 $863,287 $22,445,449 $897,818 $23,343,267 $933,731 $24,276,998 $971,080 $25,248,078 $1,009,923 $26,258,001 $1,050,320 $27,308,321 $1.092,333 $28,400,654 $1,136,026 $29,536,680 $1,181,467 $30,718,147 $1,228,726 $31,946,873 $1,100,312 $28,608,119 $1,144,325 $29,752,444 $1,190,098 $30,942,542 $1,237,702 $32,180,244 $1,287,210 $33,467,453 $1,338,698 $34,806,152 $1,392,246 $36,198,398 $1,447,936 $37,646,333 $1,505,853 $39,152,187 $1,566,087 $40,718,274 $846,603 $22,011,665 $880,467 $22,892,132 $915,685 $23,807,817 $952,313 $24,760,130 $990,405 $25,750,535 $246,700 $6,414,191 $256,568 $6,670,758 $266,830 $6,937,589 $277,504 $7,215,092 $288,604 $7,503,696 $700,392 $18,210,186 $728,407 $18,938,593 $757,544 $19,696,137 $787,845 $20,483,983 $819,359 $21,303,342 $1,030,021 $26,780,557 $1,071,222 $27,851,779 $1,114,071 $28,965,850 $1,158,634 $30,124,484 $1,204,979 $31,329,463 $300,148 $7,803,844 $312,154 $8,115,998 $324,640 $8,440,638 $337,626 $8,778,263 $351,131 $9,129,394 $852,134 $22,155,476 $886,219 $23,041,695 $921,668 $23,963,363 $958,535 $24,921,897 $996,876 $25,918,773 ..............in n I ............ Table CST-1 Page 3 hCOST SUMMARY OF BUILDINGS By Options and Priorities Little Rock School District TYPE OF SCHOOL TOTAL BASE COST NO NAME 1995 PRIORITY 1 1-2 Years 1995-1997 PRIORITY 2 3 Years 1998 HIGH SCHOOLS 1 CENTRAL (Main Building) (Gymnasium) (Library) (Quigley Stadium) Subtotal Central $4,790,209 $290,617 $201,263 $481,629 $5,763,718 $2,942,332 $77,225 $51,905 $153,017 $3,224,480 $922,092 $172,597 $10,158 $69,536 $1,174,383 2 McClellan 3 J.A.FAIR 4 HALL 5 PARKVIEW (Building 1) (Building 2) (Building 3) Subtotal Parkview TOTAL HIGH SCHOOLS $3,489,032 $1,725,309 $2,182,064 $724,389 $24,087 $89,396 $837,872 $13,997,995 $579,059 $411,771 $453,800 $8,690 $0 $0 $8,690 $4,677,800 $1,397,303 $235,246 $800,095 $314,469 $24,087 $19,621 $358,177 $3,965,204 VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL 6 METROPOLITAN TOTAL VTS $3,488,387 $3,488,387 $412,381 $412,381 $505,588 $505,588 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 7 CLOVERDALE 8 DUNBAR 9 FOREST HEIGHTS 10 HENDERSON $687,389 $3,855,668 $2,410,310 $845,431 $228,836 $1,476,235 $822,810 $219,472 $73,850 $533,350 $632,646 $105,842 11 MABELVALE 12 MANN MAGNET 13 PULASKI HEIGHTS (Building #1) (Building #2) (Building #1) (Building #2) (Building #3) $930,224 $484,276 $926,119 $74,076 $619,968 14 SOUTHWEST TOTAL JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS $1,483,632 $12,317,113 $99,054 $21,565 $43,756 $12,890 $233,662 $18,690 $3,176,970 $70,719 $348,274 $379,487 $12,786 $120,624 $468,791 $2,746,368 ALTERNATE LEARNING CENTER 15 ALC TOTAL ALC $1,183,270 $1,183,270 $415,614 $415,614 $474,524 $474,524 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS 16 BADGETT 17 BALE 18 BASELINE 19 BOOKER MAGNET 20 BRADY 21 22 23 24 25 CARVER MAGNET CHICOT CLOVERDALE DAVID O DODD FAIR PARK $666,504 $1,200,466 $1,111,915 $692,564 $476,919 $378,889 $0 $481,989 $954,119 $145,216 $341,296 $156,719 $154,780 $220 $5,028 $0 $45,062 $12,275 $145,305 $423,784 $351,026 $25,820 $263,911 $121,554 $0 $56,127 $183,633 26 FOREST PARK 27 FRANKLIN 28 FULBRIGHT $752,687 $1,845,175 $484,019 $91,391 $214,024 $26,102 $373,162 $626,040 $43,098 29 30 GARLAND GEYER SPRINGS $321,017 $36,857 I $96,646 Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I Table CST-3 PRIORITY 3 3-5 Years 98-2001 $172,319 $7,328 $3,618 $162,128 $345,393 $1,078,795 $454,968 $404,394 $967 $0 $0 $967 $2,284,516 $1,567,873 $1,567,873 $228,017 $1,442,690 $722,897 $191,157 $328,736 $37,185 $211,865 $11,088 $35,202 $548,199 $3,757,036 $133,401 $133,401 $279,738 $150,163 $402,280 $472,862 $76,076 $45,033 $0 $241,614 $474,315 $190,839 $650,595 $129,202 $51,671 PRIORITY 4 5-10 Years 2001-2006 $0 $33,467 $0 $0 $33,467 $18,588 $77,696 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $129,750 $3,567 $3,567 $0 $86,423 $8,415 $0 $125,146 $26,257 $111,557 $5,211 $220,540 $182,264 $765,812 $40,658 $40,658 $21,651 $178,047 $8,001 $1,557 $0 $1,332 $0 $0 $127,580 $0 $136,192 $71,761 $2,588 PRIORITY S 10-15 Years 2006-2011 $753,466 $0 $135,580 $96,948 $965,994 $415,286 $545,629 $523,775 $400,263 $0 $69,775 $470,038 $2,940,722 $998,969 $998,969 $156,684 $316,970 $223,542 $328,960 $306,569 $50,996 $179,454 $32,101 $9,960 $265,689 $1,870,926 $119,074 $119,074 $74,594 $107,175 $193,689 $237,544 $136,712 $205,943 $0 $139,186 $156,315 $97,295 $218,324 $213,856 $133,255 PRIORITY TOTALS No Escalation $4,790,209 $290,617 $201,263 $481,629 $5,763,718 $3,489,032 $1,725,309 $2,182,064 $724,389 $24,087 $89,396 $837,872 $13,997,995 $3,488,387 $3,488,387 $687,389 $3,855,668 $2,410,310 $845,431 $930,224 $484,276 $926,119 $74,076 $619,988 $1,463,632 12,317,113 $1,183,270 $1,183,270 $666,504 $1,200,466 $1,111,915 $892,564 $476,919 $378,689 $0 $481,989 $954,119 $752,687 $1,845,175 $484,019 $321,017 Table CST-3 Page 1 OIST SITE NO 1 12 8 2 5 4 15 7 9 13 16 3 10 11 14 19 17 22 6 18 21 27 31 32 23 24 25 48 26 37COST SUMMARY OF BUILDINGS By Options and Priorities Little Rock School District TYPE OF SCHOOL NO NAME 31 GIBBS MAGNET 32 ISH 33 JEFFERSON 34 MARTIN L KING 35 MABELVALE 36 MCDERMOTT 37 MEADOWCLIFF 38 MITCHELL 39 MARTIN L KING 40 OTTER CREEK 41 PULASKI HEIGHTS 42 RIGHTSELL 43 ROCKEFELLER 44 ROMINE 45 TERRY 46 WAKEFIELD 47 WASHINGTON 48 WATSON 49 WESTERN HILLS 50 WILLIAMS MAGNET 51 WILSON TOTAL BASE COST 1995 $215,003 $239,042 $1,568,674 $689,136 $1,138,095 $239,042 $674,313 $1,389,146 $645,652 $399,444 $1,660,421 $498,742 $313,822 $937,532 $850,067 $723,963 $933,698 PRIORITY 1 1-2 Years 1995-1997 $5,446 $0 $334,844 $94,614 $71,174 $0 $48,281 $302,995 $61,724 $133,487 $233,762 $96,792 $7,807 $306,388 $89,413 $211,937 $23,358 PRIORITY 2 3 Years 1998 $12,684 $0 $474,776 $208,177 $921,415 $0 $422,872 $429,235 $264,764 $11,695 $499,837 $194,583 $7,206 $252,213 $304,581 $294,576 $440,444 52 WOODRUFF TOTAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS $22,682,055 $3,252,993 $7,449,166 ADMINISTRATION BUILDINGS TOTAL ADMINISTRATION $2,661,172 $511,026 $697,256 SUBTOTAL SCHOOLS \u0026amp; ADMIN $56,329,991 $12,446,784 $15,838,105 DISTRICT ESTIMATES ADA COSTS ROOF REPLACEMENT ASBESTOS ABATEMENT TOTAL SCHOOLS \u0026amp; ADMIN Deduct District Costs TOTAL BASIS AMOUNT Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I Table CST-3 PRIORITY 3 3-5 Years 98-2001 $39,827 $0 $561,070 $231,863 $27,798 $0 $86,664 $175,058 $58,917 $48,492 $89,785 $60,406 $12,597 $205,311 $316,702 $67,012 $198,818 $5,344,708 $812,769 $13,900,303 PRIORITY 4 5-10 Years 2001-2006 $38,364 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $650,913 $2,540 $0 $0 $5,537 $0 $101,260 $1,347,324 $296,593 $2,583,704 PRIORITY 5 10-15 Years 2006-2011 $118,682 $239,042 $197,984 $154,481 $117,708 $239,042 $116,496 $481,858 $260,247 $205,770 $186,123 $144,419 $286,212 $171,619 $133,834 $150,437 $169,818 $5,287,864 $343,530 $11,561,084 PRIORITY TOTALS No Escalation $215,003 $239,042 $1,568,674 $689,136 $1,138,095 $239,042 $674,313 $1,389,146 $645,652 $399,444 $1,660,421 $498,742 $313,822 $937,532 $850,067 $723,963 $933,698 $22,682,055 $2,661,172 $56,329,992 OIST SITE NO 27 49 30 35 46 20 33 34 35 10 38 39 50 40 47 51 42 32 29 43 44 45 IH OPTIONS OPTION M ESCALATION OPTION T ESCALATION OPTION C ESCALATION TOTAL PROJECT COST TOTAL PROJECT COST TOTAL PROJECT COST I $5,386,000 $3,452,000 $3,185,000 $68,352,991 ($1,223,000) $67,129,991 $12,730,000 $3,194,400 $63,054,391 $23,413,500 $3,621,740 $94,165,231 $18,281,000 $3,416,440 $88,827,431 $1,386,000 $674,000 $1,685,000 $16,191,784 ($1,223,000) $14,968,764 $0 $1,221,453 $16,190,237 $0 $1,221,453 $16,190,237 $0 $1,221,453 $16,190,237 $1,000,000 $261,000 $1,500,010 $18,599,115 $18,599,115 $12,730,000 $3,911,879 $35,240,994 $12,808,500 $3,921,680 $35,329,296 $11,807,000 $3,796,629 $34,202,745 $1,000,000 $406,000 $15,306,303 $15,306,303 $0 $3,316,155 $18,622,458 $8,291,000 $5,112,424 $28,709,728 $6,474,000 $4,718,766 $26,499,069 $1,000,000 $1,425,000 $5,008,704 $5,008,704 $0 $2,405,401 $7,414,105 $2,314,000 $3,516,687 $10,839,391 $0 $2,405,401 $7,414,105 $1,000,000 $686,000 $0 $13,247,084 $13,247,084 $0 $10,610,166 $23,857,250 $0 $10,610,166 $23,857,250 $0 $10,610,166 $23,857,250 $5,386,000 $3,452,000 $3,185,010 $68,352,991 ($1,223,000) $67,129,991 $12,730,000 $21,465,054 $101,325,045 $23,413,500 $24,382,410 $114,925,901 $18,281,000 $22,752,415 $108,163,406 Table CST-3 Page 2 COST SUMMARY OF BUILDINGS By Options and Priorities Little Rock School District TYPE OF SCHOOL NO NAME TOTAL BASE COST 1995 PRIORITY 1 1-2 Years 1995-1997 PRIORITY 2 3 Years 1996 OPTION M ADDITIONS NEW SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION $5,811,000 $6,919,000 $5,811,000 $6,919,000 Total Option Cost ESCALATION IMPACT COST ESCALATION @ 4%/YEAR ESCALATION DETAIL 1 $12,730,000 $79,859,991 1 Year 1995 $3,194,400 $83,054,391 $3,194,400 1996 I $83,054,391 2 1997 3 1998 4 1999 5 2000 6 2001 7 2002 e $0 $12,730,000 + 2003 9 2004 T 10 2005 11 2006 12 2007 13 2008 Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I Table CST-3 PRIORITY 3 3-5 Years 98-2001 $0 PRIORITY 4 5-10 Years 2001-2006 $0 PRIORITY 5 10-15 Years 2006-2011 $0 PRIORITY TOTALS No Escalation $5,811,000 $6,919,000 $12,730,000 DIST SITE NO $14,968,784 1 -2 years 1995-1997 $31,329,115 3 Years $15,306,303 3-5 Years $5,008,704 5-10 Years $13,247,084 10-15 Years $79,859,991 $1,221,453 1998 $3,911,879 2000 $3,316,155 2005 $2,405,401 2010 $10,610,166 $21,465,054 $16,190,237 $598,751 $15,567,536 $622,701 $16,190,237 $647,609 $16,837,847 $673,514 $17,511,360 $700,454 $18,211,815 $728,473 $18,940,287 $757,611 $19,697,899 $787,916 $20,485,815 $819,433 $21,305,247 $852,210 $22,157,457 $35,240,994 $18,622,458 $7,414,105 $23,857,250 $101,325,045 $1,253,165 $32,562,280 $612,252 $15,918,555 $200,348 $5,209,052 $529,883 $13,776,967 $1,303,291 $33,885,571 $1,355,423 $35,240,994 $1,409,640 $36,650,634 $1,466,025 $38,116,659 $1,524,666 $39,641,326 $1,585,653 $41,226,979 $1,649,079 $42,876,058 $1,715,042 $44,591,100 $1,783,644 $46,374,744 $636,742 $16,555,298 $662,212 I $17,217,510 $688,700 $17,906,210 $716,248 $18,622,458 $744,898 $19,367,357 $774,694 $20,142,051 $805,682 $20,947,733 $837,909 $21,785,642 $871,426 $22,657,068 $208,362 $5,417,414 $216,697 $5,634,111 $225,364 $5,859,475 $234,379 $6,093,854 $243,754 $6,337,608 $253,504 $6,591,113 $263,645 $6,854,757 $274,190 $7,128,948 $285,158 $7,414,105 $551,079 $14,328,046 $573,122 $14,901,168 $596,047 $15,497,215 $619,889 $16,117,103 $644,684 $16,761,787 $670,471 $17,432,259 $697,290 $18,129,549 $725,182 $18,854,731 $754,189 $19,608,920 } i I T I 14 2009 15 2010 $886,298 $23,043,756 $921,750 $23,965,506 $958,620 $24,924,126 $996,965 $25,921,091 $1,036,844 $26,957,935 $1,854,990 $48,229,734 $1,929,189 $50,158,923 $2,006,357 $52,165,280 $2,086,611 $54,251,891 $2,170,076 $56,421,967 $906,283 $23,563,351 $942,534 $24,505,885 $980,235 $25,486,120 $1,019,445 $26,505,565 $1,060,223 $27,565,788 $296,564 $7,710,670 $308,427 $8,019,096 $320,764 $8,339,860 $333,594 $8,673,455 $346,938 $9,020,393 $784,357 $20,393,277 $815,731 $21,209,008 $848,360 $22,057,369 $882,295 $22,939,663 $917,587 $23,857,250 Table CST-3 Page 3COST SUMMARY OF BUILDINGS By Options and Priorities Little Rock School District TYPE OF SCHOOL NO NAME TOTAL BASE COST 1995 PRIORITY 1 1-2 Years 1995-1997 PRIORITY 2 3 Years 1998 OPTION T ADDITIONS NEW SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION Total Option Cost ESCALATION IMPACT COST ESCALATION @ 4%/ YEAR ESCALATION DETAIL 1 1996 2 1997 3 1998 4 1999 5 2000 6 2001 7 2002 6 2003 9 2004 10 2005 11 2006 12 2007 T X 13 2008 14 X 2009 15 2010 $13,513,500 $9,900,000 $23,413,500 BASE COST $90,543,491 1 Year 1995 $3,621,740 $94,165,231 $3,621,740 $94,165,231 $0 PRIORITY 1 $14,968,784 1-2 years 1995-1997 $1,221,453 $16,190,237 $598,751 $15,567,536 $622,701 $16,190,237 $647,609 $16,837,847 $673,514 $17,511,360 $700,454 $18,211,815 $728,473 $18,940,287 $757,611 $19,697,899 $787,916 $20,485,815 $819,433 $21,305,247 $852,210 $22,157,457 $866,298 $23,043,756 $921,750 $23,965,506 $958,620 $24,924,126 $996,965 $25,921,091 $1,036,844 $26,957,935 Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I Table CST-3 PRIORITY 3 3-5 Years 98-2001 PRIORITY 4 5-10 Years 2001-2006 PRIORITY S 10-15 Years 2006-2011 PRIORITY TOTALS No Escalation DIST SITE NO $7,858,500 $4,950,000 I $12,808,500 PRIORITY 2 $31,407,615 3 Years 1998 $3,921,680 $35,329,296 $1,256,305 $32,663,920 $1,306,557 I $33,970,477 $1,358,819 $35,329,296 $1,413,172 $36,742,468 $1,469,699 $38,212,166 $1,528,487 $39,740,653 $1,589,626 $41,330,279 $1,653,211 $42,983,490 $1,719,340 $44,702,830 $1,788,113 $46,490,943 $1,859,638 $48,350,581 $1,934,023 $50,284,604 $2,011,384 $52,295,988 $2,091,640 $54,387,828 $2,175,513 $56,563,341 $3,341,000 $4,950,000 $8,291,000 PRIORITY 3 $23,597,303 3-5 Years 2000 $5,112,424 $28,709,728 $943,892 $24,541,195 $981,648 $25,522,843 $1,020,914 I $26,543,757 $1,061,750 $27,605,507 $1,104,220 $28,709,728 $1,148,389 $29,858,117 $1,194,325 $31,052,441 $1,242,098 $32,294,539 $1,291,782 $33,586,321 $1,343,453 $34,929,773 $1,397,191 $36,326,964 $1,453,079 $37,780,043 $1,511,202 $39,291,245 $1,571,650 $40,862,894 $1,634,516 $42,497,410 $2,314,000 $2,314,000 PRIORITY 4 $7,322,704 5-10 Years 2005 $3,516,687 $10,839,391 $292,908 $7,615,612 $304,624 $7,920,237 $316,809 $8,237,046 $329,482 $6,566,528 $342,661 $8,909,169 $356,368 $9,265,557 $370,622 $9,636,179 $385,447 $10,021,626 $400,865 $10,422,491 $416,900 $10,839,391 $433,576 $11,272,966 $450,919 $11,723,885 $466,955 $12,192,840 $487,714 $12,680,554 $507,222 $13,187,776 $0 PRIORITY 5 $13,247,084 10-15 Years 2010 $10,610,166 $23,857,250 $529,863 $13,776,967 $551,079 $14,328,046 $573,122 $14,901,166 $596,047 $15,497,215 $619,869 $16,117,103 $644,684 $16,761,787 $670,471 $17,432,259 $697,290 $18,129,549 $725,182 $18,854,731 $754,189 $19,608,920 $764,357 $20,393,277 $815,731 $21,209,006 $848,360 $22,057,369 $882,295 $22,939,663 $917,58 $23,857,250 $13,513.500 $9,900,000 $23,413,500 TOTAL 1-5 $90,543,491 $24,382,410 $114,925,901 I ( I i Table CST-3 Page 4 I ICOST SUMMARY OF BUILDINGS By Options and Priorities Little Rock School District TYPE OF SCHOOL TOTAL BASE COST NO NAME 1995 PRIORITY 1 1-2 Years 1995-1997 PRIORITY 2 3 Years 1998 OPTION C ADDITIONS NEW SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION $14,365,000 $3,916,000 $7,891,000 $3,916,000 Total Option Cost $18,281,000 $0 $11,807,000 ESCALATION IMPACT BASE COST PRIORITY 1 PRIORITY 2 COST Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I Table CST-3 PRIORITY 3 3-S Years 98-2001 $6,474,000 $6,474,000 PRIORITY 3 PRIORITY 4 5-10 Years 2001-2006 $0 PRIORITY 4 PRIORITY 5 10-15 Years 2006-2011 $0 PRIORITY 5 PRIORITY TOTALS No Escalation $14,365,000 $3,916,000 $18,281,000 TOTAL 1-5 OIST SITE NO H II H II n ESCALATION @ 4%/ YEAR ESCALATION DETAIL 1 1996 2 1997 3 1998 4 1999 5 2000 6 2001 7 2002 I 8 2003 9 2004 10 2005 : 11 2006 ! 12! 2007 I 13 2008 14 2009 T 4- 15 2010 $85,410,991 1 Year 1995 $3,416,440 $88,827,431 $3,416,440 $88,827,431 I $14,968,784 1-2 years 1995-1997 $1,221,453 $16,190,237 $598,751 $15,567,536 $622,701 $16,190,237 $647,609 $16,837,847 $673,514 $17,511,360 $700,454 $18,211,815 $728,473 $18,940,287 $757,611 $19,697,899 $787,916 $20,485,815 $819,433 $21,305,247 $852,210 I $22,157,457 ! $886,298 I $23,043,756 I I $30,406,115 3 Years $21,780,303 3-5 Years $5,008,704 5-10 Years $13,247,084 10-15 Years $85,410,991 1998 $3,796,629 2000 $4,718,766 2005 $2,405,401 2010 $10,610,166 $22,752,415 $34,202,745 $1,216,245 $31,622,360 $1,264,894 $32,887,254 $1,315,490 $34,202,745 $1,368,110 $35,570,854 $1,422,834 $36,993,669 $1,479,748 $38,473,436 $1,538,937 $40,012,373 $1,600,495 $41,612,868 $1,664,515 $43,277,383 $1,731,095 $45,008,478 $26,499,069 $7,414,105 $23,857,250 $108,163,406 I $871,212 $22,651,515 $906,061 $23,557,576 $942,303 $24,499,879 $979,995 $25,479,874 $1,019,195 $26,499,069 I $1,059,963 $27,559,032 $1,102,361 $28,661,393 $1,146,456 $29,807,849 $1,192,314 $31,000,163 $1,240,007 $32,240,170 $200,348 $5,209,052 $208,362 $5,417,414 $216,697 $5,634,111 $225,364 $5,859,475 $234,379 $6,093,854 $243,754 $6,337,608 $253,504 $6,591,113 $263,645 $6,854,757 $274,190 $7,128,948 $285,158 $7,414,105 $529,883 $13,776,967 $551,079 $14,328,046 $573,122 $14,901,168 $596,047 $15,497,215 $619,889 $16,117,103 $644,684 $16,761,787 $670,471 $17,432,259 $697,290 $18,129,549 $725,182 $18,854,731 $754,189 I $19,608,920 $921,750 $23,965,506 $956,620 $1,800,339 $46,806,818 $1,872,353 $48,681,170 $24,924,126 $996,965 $25,921,091 $1,036,844 $26,957,935 $1,947,247 $50,628,417 $2,025,137 $52,653,554 $2,106,142 $54,759,696 $1,289,607 $33,529,776 $1,341,191 $34,870,967 $1,394,839 $36,265,806 $1,450,632 $37,716,438 $1,508,658 $39,225,096 $296,564 $7,710,670 $308,427 $6,019,096 $320,764 $8,339,860 $333,594 $8,673,455 $346,938 $9,020,393 $784,357 $20,393,277 $815,731 $21,209,008 $848,360 $22,057,369 $882,295 $22,939,663 $917,587 $23,857,250 Table CST-3 Page 5 Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I ATTENDANCE ZONE COMPOSITION (A TTENDANCE ZONE MODIFIED) CST - 4 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT tn D . tn tn LU in in SCHOOL OPTION \"M II BADGETT BALE (REVISED) BASELINE (REVISED) BOOKER MAGNET BRADY CARVER MAGNET CHICOT CLOVERDALE (REVISED) DAVID O DODD FAIR PARK (CLOSED) FOREST PARK (REVISED) FRANKLIN FULBRIGHT GARLAND (CLOSED) GEYER SPRINGS (REVISED) GIBBS MAGNET q: LU X o LU X O \u0026lt; m \u0026lt; O o \u0026lt; to z. LU o Qt LU Q. o \u0026lt; 0. \u0026lt; o o z \u0026lt; tn LU Ql o o LL LU to \u0026lt; LU Q 56 49 138 129 101 143 200 152 152 143 74 69 141 129 162 268 281 25 21 353 328 26 61 104 104 89 257 239 268 442 160 138 395 368 369 585 65% 64% 65% 65% 73% 76% 179 118 379 270 47% 44% z o u tn LU Q. LL tn o o \u0026lt; LU tn \u0026lt; Li. \u0026lt;2 in tf\u0026gt; /\u0026gt; o o o z LU tn tn O o tn tn z o o 5 LU z. 358 335 421 395 173 156 194 137 171 449 418 287 255 313 226 379 510 478 495 464 314 285 356 405 452 474 439 640 583 339 287 483 70% 70% 85% 85% 55% 55% 54% 34% 38% 95% 95% 45% 44% 92% 79% 78% 219 219 335 335 400 400 641 641 445 445 598 523 523 434 434 369 369 340 430 430 472 472 565 565 297 321 321 341 341 59 81 -60 -33 31 -185 641 66 175 598 13 45 -61 -30 55 84 -16 25 -22 -2 33 -75 -18 -42 34 -162 341 Elementary 5,900 8,100 -6,000 -3,300 3,100 -18,500 64,100 6,600 17,500 59,800 1,300 4,500 -6,100 -3,000 5,500 8,400 -1,600 2,500 -2,200 -200 3,300 -7,500 -1,800 -4,200 3,400 -16,200 34,100 Subtotal $214,500 $1,202,500 $195,000 $143,000 $117,000 $1,053,000 $2,925,000 I Table CST-4 Page 1 $0Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I ATTENDANCE ZONE COMPOSITION (ATTENDANCE ZONE MODIFIED) CST - 4 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL OPTION \"M ISH II (CLOSED) JEFFERSON (CLOSED) MARTIN L KING MCDERMOTT (REVISED) MABELVALE) MEADOWCLIFF MITCHELL (CLOSED) OTTER CREEK (REVISED) PULASKI HEIGHTS RIGHTSELL (REVISED) ROCKEFELLER ROMINE TERRY (REVISED) WAKEFIELD (CLOSED) WASHINGTON WATSON (REVISED) a LU I o iu X g O 2 m \u0026lt; t- O 340 250 590 o \u0026lt; _l m 2 LU O O' LU Q. 42% o \u0026lt; 0. \u0026lt; o o z \u0026lt; O' LU Q. o 445 tn D Q. X D V\u0026gt; + O u. LU Q LU Q -145 z o w X LU O. LL tn o o \u0026lt; LU X \u0026lt; -14,500' u. 55 \u0026lt;o V) o o o z UJ Of u. 52 u\u0026gt; U) Vi @) h V\u0026gt; O O X I Z Q O 5 LU Z Elementary 1 4 2^7 27% 167 153 170 155 11 336 306 254 235 18 14 27 26 34 32 557 408 106 16 15 110 107 462 465 169 302 356 315 316 278 317 469 469 466 578 523 468 486 433 328 99% 99% 36% 52% 68% 67% 65% 64% 97% 634 634 510 510 527 527 448 448 283 165 165 44 -68 4 59 -38 15 -45 16,500 16,500 4,400 -6,800 400 5,900 -3,800 1,500 -4,500 $442,000 160 135 92 80 316 306 222 204 390 368 229 282 394 666 574 427 414 496 441 346 315 334 320 249 230 424 400 786 690 500 682 589 537 521 32% 31% 27% 25% 95% 96% 89% 89% 92% 92% 29% 41% 79% 367 367 380 380 264 264 426 426 409 409 526 526 524 -129 34 65 -70 -56 177 196 -15 ___9 -260 -164 24 -12,900 -7,400 3,400 6,500 -7,000 -5,600 17,700 19,600 -1,500 900 -26,000 -16,400 2,400 $481,000 $364,000 $1,066,000 98% 97% 80% 79% 782 782 491 491 100 193 -46 -30 10,000 19,300 -4,600 -3,000 Subtotal $195,000 $2,548,000 $0 Table CST-4 Page 2fl Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I ATTENDANCE ZONE COMPOSITION (ATTENDANCE ZONE MODIFIED) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL OPTION \"M WESTERN HILLS WILLIAMS MAGNET WILSON WOODRUFF II (REVISED) (CLOSED) PROPOSED NEW SCHOOL PROPOSED NEW SCHOOL OPTION \"M II CLOVERDALE DUNBAR FOREST HEIGHTS HENDERSON MABELVALE MANN MAGNET (CLOSED) PULASKI HEIGHTS SOUTHWEST CST - 4 to 3 _l Q. U. D CO LU kO IO IX LU I o LU X 5 O m \u0026lt; I- O t- o \u0026lt; m z LU o a: LU Q. O \u0026lt; 0. \u0026lt; o o z \u0026lt; K LU 0. O 122 119 193 186 315 305 61% 61% o LU LU Q \u0026lt; LU Q 202 199 60 287 274 85 489 473 145 59% 58% 59% 340 340 501 421 421 316 25 35 501 -68 -52 171 28 449 127 200 139 129 255 222 247 209 148 314 295 281 313 614 642 96% 0 -642 167 616 27% 0 -616 z o Vi lU Q. iu tn o o \u0026lt; LU O' \u0026lt; LX. u5 \u0026lt;o t Vi O U O z LU O' m O o IX tn z o o 5 ai z Elementary 2,500 3,500 50,100 -6,800 -5,200 17,100 -64,200 -61,600 Subtotal TOTAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS $338,000 $338,000 $5,811,000 $3,531,000 $3,388,000 $6,919,000 $6,919,000 657 741 585 517 452 574 685 542 415 784 941 724 646 707 796 932 751 563 84% 79% 81% 80% 64% 72% 73% 72% 74% 1000 1000 1046 1046 1268 1268 1221 1221 737 216 59 322 400 561 472 289 470 174 Jr.High School 416 378 591 53S 730 673 872 848 57% 56% 68% 63% 938 955 971 971 971 938 225 298 99 123 TOTAL JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Table CST-4 Page 3 $0Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/1 ATTENDANCE ZONE COMPOSITION (A TTENDANCE ZONE MODIFIED) CST-4 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT co o _l a. Of 3 U) U. io IO SCHOOL OPTION \"Wl II CENTRAL FAIR HALL MCCLELLAN PARKVIEW MAGNET K LU X I- O LU I 5 O 3 ffi \u0026lt; I- O o 3 m z UJ o a: UJ Q. O \u0026lt; Q. \u0026lt; O o z \u0026lt; K UJ Q. O o LL UJ Q \u0026lt; in o Z o CO Q UJ LU Ui o o \u0026lt; in q: \u0026lt; u. io u\u0026gt; @ CO O O O z UJ tn w O o O' co z o o 5 LU Z 575 496 257 242 404 333 211 272 365 1030 1164 579 491 533 420 882 755 435 1605 1660 836 733 937 753 1093 1027 800 64% 70% 69% 67% 57% 56% 81% 74% 54% 2252 2252 1206 1206 1385 1385 1157 1157 991 647 592 370 473 448 632 64 130 191 TOTAL SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS SUMMARY OPTION \"M\" COSTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Sr.High School $0 ADDITION $5,811,000 $0 ________$0 $5,811,000 NEW $6,919,000 $0 _______$0 $6,919,000 $12,730,000 Table CST-4 Page 4Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I ATTENDANCE ZONE COMPOSITION (ATTENDANCE ZONE MODIFIED) CST-5 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT (0 :o _i Q. Z Z) w u. 2 U) lA SCHOOL OPTION \"T II BADGETT (REVISED) BALE (REVISED) BASELINE_______ BOOKER MAGNET (REVISED) BRADY__________ CARVER MAGNET CHICOT (REVISED) CLOVERDALE (REVISED) DAVID O DODD FAIR PARK (CLOSED) I FOREST PARK FRANKLIN (REVISED) FULBRIGHT GARLAND (CLOSED) GEYER SPRINGS GIBBS MAGNET (REVISED) UJ I o UJ z S o m O O \u0026lt; _i DO z tu o a: UJ Q. to \u0026lt; Q. \u0026lt; o o z \u0026lt; ce UJ Q. o O iu Q \u0026lt; I- _i LU Q z o w q: UJ LL (n o o \u0026lt; UI q: \u0026lt; LL io vy @ I to O to o z UJ a: V) O o d: tn z O o g UJ z Elementary 56 6 138 158 101 108 200 212 152 243 74 113 141 106 162 268 239 25 48 353 382 26 61 148 104 329 257 434 268 592 160 335 395 592 369 700 65% 98% 65% 73% 73% 85% 179 4 379 216 47% 2% 358 329 421 325 173 154 194 510 572 495 438 314 260 356 70% 58% 85% 74% 55% 59% 54% 219 219 335 335 400 400 641 445 445 598 523 523 434 434 369 369 340 59 -116 -60 -257 31 -300 66 229 13 -49 -61 -4 55 109 5,900 -11,600 -6,000 -25,700 3,100 -30,000 6,600 22,900 1,300 -4,900 -6,100 -400 5,500 10,900 $754,000 $1,670,500 $1,950,000 $318,500 $26,000 137 ___7_ 449 561 287 39 313 405 246 474 609 640 421 339 34% 3% 95% 92% 45% 9% 92% 430 430 472 472 565 565 297 25 184 -2 -137 -75 144 -42 2,500 18,400 -200 -13,700 -7,500 14,400 -4,200 $890,500 226 519 287 667 79% 78% 321 321 341 34 -346 341 3,400 -34,600 34,100 Subtotal $2,249,000 $7,858,500 I $0 Table CST-5 Page 1Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I ATTENDANCE ZONE COMPOSITION (ATTENDANCE ZONE MODIFIED) CST \u0026lt;5 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT tn D a. tn =3 tn SCHOOL OPTION \"T II ISH (CLOSED) JEFFERSON (CLOSED) MARTIN L KING MCDERMOTT MABELVALE (NOT USED) MEADOWCLIFF (NOT USED) MITCHELL (CLOSED) OTTER CREEK PULASKI HEIGHTS (REVISED) RIGHTSELL (NOT USED) ROCKEFELLER (REVISED) ROMINE (REVISED) TERRY (REVISED) WAKEFIELD (CLOSED) WASHINGTON tn UJ I I- o Z 5 O 3 CO o 340 250 590 o \u0026lt; m z UJ o tn UJ Q. 42% o \u0026lt; o o z UJ Q. O 445 t o u. UI Q \u0026lt; LU Q -145 7 91 297 445 167 462 378 169 35 356 469 469 466 480 523 99% 81% 36% 7% 68% 634 634 510 510 527 165 165 44 30 4 170 316 486 65% 448 -38 11 336 233 254 312 18 27 19 34 173 557 506 106 16 13 317 328 97% 283 -45 160 60 92 144 316 496 293 346 456 334 32% 20% 27% 32% 95% 367 367 380 380 264 -129 74 34 -76 -70 z O 0) tn LU Q. LL tn o o UJ tn \u0026lt; -14,500 16,500 16,500 4,400 3,000 400 -3,800 -4,500 -12,900 7,400 3,400 -7,600 -7,000 u. \u0026lt;2 u\u0026gt; \u0026lt;0 W O O O Z LU OC u. 52 in in @) 0) O o od CO z o o 5 UI z Elementary $494,000 222 451 390 574 229 76 394 249 470 424 747 786 582 500 89% 96% 92% 77% 29% 13% 79% 426 426 409 409 526 526 524 177 -44 -15 -338 -260 -56 24 17,700 -4,400 -1,500 -33,800 -26,000 -5,600 2,400 $286,000 $2,197,000 $364,000 666 645 682 658 98% 98% 782 782 100 124 10,000 12,400 Subtotal $3,341,000 I $0 Table CST-5 Page 2Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I ATTENDANCE ZONE COMPOSITION (ATTENDANCE ZONE MODIFIED) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CST-5 SCHOOL OPTION \"T II WATSON (REVISED) WESTERN HILLS WILLIAMS MAGNET (REVISED) WILSON (NOT USED) WOODRUFF NEW SCHOOLS (NOT USED) (LOCATIONS TO BE DETERMINED) Of LU Z I- O iu I 5 it: o 3 m O it: o 3 m z LU O z UJ Q. 110 139 122 240 427 538 193 270 537 677 315 510 80% 79% 61% 53% 202 287 489 59% 60 85 145 59% 128 125 743 743 871 868 85% 86% SUMMARY OPTION \"T\" COSTS (/} 3 Q. K W o \u0026lt; CL \u0026lt; o o z \u0026lt; q: lU Q. o 491 491 340 340 501 421 316 900 900 O u. UI Q \u0026lt; Ui Q z o Ui z UJ Q. LL Ui o o \u0026lt; UJ Q \u0026lt; u. 52 in to Ui O o o z UJ q: u. w in in @ W o o cd (Z\u0026gt; z O o UI Z Elementary -46 -186 25 -170 501 -68 171 465 466 -4,600 -18,600 2,500 -17,000 50,100 -6,800 17,100 90,000 90,000 Subtotal TOTAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS (Not Effected) SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS (Not Effected) $1,209,000 $1,105,000 $2,314,000 $13,513,500 $4,950,000 $4,950,000 $9,900,000 $9,900,000 ADDITION $13,513,500 $0 ________$0 $13,513,500 NEW $9,900,000 $0 _______$0 $9,900,000 $23,413,500 Table CST-5 Page 3H Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I B ATTENDANCE ZONE COMPOSITION (A TTENDANCE ZONE MODIFIED) CST-6 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT w D _l Q. 0 O v\u0026gt; u. 52 io IO SCHOOL OPTION \"C II BADGETT (REVISED) BALE (REVISED) BASELINE BOOKER MAGNET BRADY__________ CARVER MAGNET CHICOT CLOVERDALE (REVISED) DAVID O DODD (REVISED) FAIR PARK (CLOSED) FOREST PARK (REVISED) FRANKLIN (REVISED) FULBRIGHT GARLAND (CLOSED) GEYER SPRINGS GIBBS MAGNET ISH (REVISED) (CLOSED) 0* UJ I I- O UJ X 5 o 3 m o lx: o m z UJ o a: LU Q. o \u0026lt; Q. \u0026lt; O o z. \u0026lt; K UJ Q. O O u. UJ o Ji _i UI o z o w a: UI LL o o \u0026lt; UJ O' \u0026lt; u. 52 u\u0026gt; (D @ CD o o o z LU q: W O o q: Z o o 5 UJ z Elementary 66 66 138 137 101 145 200 300 152 90 74 89 141 221 162 268 516 25 47 353 380 26 61 152 104 292 257 247 268 186 170 358 395 384 369 331 61% 82% 65% 64% 73% 56% 179 55 379 355 47% 15% 358 386 421 438 173 227 194 137 202 449 612 287 48 313 226 548 510 476 495 527 314 448 356 405 718 474 659 640 428 339 287 700 70% 81% 85% 83% 55% 51% 54% 34% 28% 95% 93% 45% 11% 92% 79% 78% 219 219 335 335 400 400 641 445 445 598 523 523 434 434 369 369 340 430 430 472 472 565 565 297 321 321 341 49 -139 -60 -49 31 69 66 90 598 13 47 -61 -93 55 -79 25 -288 -2 -187 -75 137 -42 34 -379 341 -13,900 -4,900 6,900 9,000 4,700 -9,300 -7,900 2,675 -28,800 -200 -18,700 -7,500 13,700 -4,200 3,400 -37,900 Subtotal $903,500 $318,500 $604,500 $513,500 $1,872,000 $1,215,500 $2,463,500 $7,891,000 $0 Table CST-6 Page 1Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/1 ATTENDANCE ZONE COMPOSITION (ATTENDANCE ZONE MODIFIED) CST-6 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT w Q. X 3 tn SCHOOL OPTION \"C II JEFFERSON (CLOSED) MARTIN L KING MCDERMOTT MABELVALE MEADOWCLIFF (NOT USED) MITCHELL (CLOSED) OTTER CREEK PULASKI HEIGHTS (NOT USED) RIGHTSELL (REVISED) ROCKEFELLER (REVISED) ROMINE (REVISED) TERRY WAKEFIELD (CLOSED) WASHINGTON WATSON or UJ X o X 5 O m \u0026lt; (- o 340 590 o \u0026lt; _i 03 2 LU O 01 LU Q. 42% o \u0026lt; Q. \u0026lt; o o z \u0026lt; 01 LU Q. O 445 5 LL LU Q \u0026lt; LU O -145 z o w O' LU LU o o \u0026lt; LU Q^ \u0026lt; u. u5 co F tn O o O z LU O' LU 52 lO in U) o o q: z o o S LU Z Elementary 7 147 297 419 167 187 170 462 459 169 83 356 217 316 469 606 466 502 523 404 486 99% 76% 36% 17% 68% 54% 65% 634 634 510 510 527 527 448 165 28 44 8 4 123 -38 2,800 4,400 800 400 12,300 -3,800 11 336 304 254 18 20 27 88 34 94 557 399 106 16 98 110 22 317 328 97% 283 -45 -4,500 160 66 92 496 370 346 32% 18% 27% 367 367 380 -129 -3 34 -12,900 -300 3,400 $19,500 316 531 222 587 390 536 229 87 394 334 551 249 675 424 630 786 486 500 95% 96% 89% 87% 92% 85% 29% 18% 79% 264 264 426 426 409 409 526 526 524 -70 177 -249 -15 -221 -260 40 24 -7,000 -28,700 17,700 -24,900 -1,500 -22,100 -26,000 4,000 2,400 $1,865,500 $1,618,500 $1,436,500 666 667 427 419 682 765 537 441 98% 87% 80% 95% 782 782 491 491 100 17 -46 60 10,000 1,700 -4,600 6,000 Subtotal $4,940,000 $0 Table CST-6 Page 2Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I ATTENDANCE ZONE COMPOSITION (ATTENDANCE ZONE MODIFIED) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CST-6 SCHOOL OPTION \"C II WESTERN HILLS WILLIAMS MAGNET a: UJ I O UJ I o m O 122 182 193 394 315 576 202 287 489 o 3 m z UJ o a: UJ Q. 61% 68% 59% Ui ZD -I Q. q: o Ui LL w A m o \u0026lt; a. \u0026lt; o o z \u0026lt; q: UJ Q. o 340 340 501 421 6 LL UJ O \u0026lt; UJ Q z O Ui a: UJ IL Ui o o ? IE. \u0026lt; u. !2 io (O @) w O o O z UJ Q (0 O o of Ui z o 5 UJ z Elementary 25 -236 501 -68 -23,600 $1,534,000 WILSON (NOT USED) 60 85 145 59% 316 171 WOODRUFF (CLOSED) PROPOSED NEW SCHOOL 73 639 712 90% 712 71,200 Subtotal TOTAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS $1,534,000 $14,365,000 $3,916,000 $3,916,000 $3,916,000 I Table CST-6 Page 3Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I ATTENDANCE ZONE COMPOSITION (A TTENDANCE ZONE MODIFIED) CST-6 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT w o Q. o u. OT in lA SCHOOL OPTION \"C II CLOVERDALE DUNBAR FOREST HEIGHTS HENDERSON MABELVALE MANN MAGNET (CLOSED) PULASKI HEIGHTS I a SOUTHWEST Q UJ I 1- O LU I 5 O m \u0026lt; I- O O 3 OQ z UJ o O' UJ Q. (D \u0026lt; Q. \u0026lt; o o z \u0026lt; O' UJ a. O 6 u. UJ Q \u0026lt; UJ Q z o tn UJ u V) o o @) \u0026lt; UI O' \u0026lt; u. A to in O o O z UI Q^ o o oi H W Z o o 5 UJ z Jr.High School 127 195 139 19 255 609 247 174 148 657 602 585 746 452 462 685 433 415 784 797 724 765 707 1071 932 607 563 84% 76% 81% 98% 64% 43% 73% 71% 74% 1000 1000 1046 1046 1268 1268 1221 1221 737 216 203 322 281 561 197 289 614 174 21,600 20,300 32,200 28,100 56,100 19,700 28,900 61,400 17,400 314 110 281 264 416 473 591 582 730 583 872 846 57% 81% 68% 69% 935 955 955 971 971 935 225 372 99 125 93,500 22,500 39,804 9,900 12,500 TOTAL JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS $oT $0 SUMMARY OPTION \"C\" COSTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS (Not Effected) ADDITION $14,365,000 $0 $0 $14,365,000 NEW $3,916,000 $0 _______$0 $3,916,000 $18,281,000 Table CST-6 Page 4Demographic StudyLittle Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I Analysis of 1994 1995 Enrollment Projections Table DS-1 Summary 1994 1995 1994 25258 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 24515 24076 23610 23156 22795 22550 22348 22154 21941 21805 21636 24922 24711 24280 23829 23385 22990 22731 22537 22353 22157 22042 delta delta % 407 635 670 673 590 440 383 383 412 1.66% 2.64% 2.84% 2.91% 2.59% 1.95% 1.71% 1.73% 1.88% 352 406 1.61% 1.88% Enrollment Projections 1995 to 2005 Grades Pre-K Kindergarten 1st 2nd 3rd 4fh 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th Ungraded elem jr.hi sr. hi 1994 1995 747 2050 2051 1900 1858 1760 1860 1797 1840 1791 1899 1946 1598 1435 1996 718 2046 2094 1890 1843 1749 1849 1796 1821 1789 1846 1917 1608 1426 1997 704 1941 2076 1989 1820 1794 1706 1803 1818 1671 1680 1921 1597 1432 1998 707 1901 1970 1972 1916 1773 1750 1664 1830 1667 1569 1749 1594 1423 1999 703 1914 1928 1872 1900 1868 1731 1707 1687 1679 1565 1633 1450 1418 2000 696 1889 1942 1832 1803 1852 1825 1688 1730 1548 1578 1629 1355 1289 2001 690 1872 1918 1845 1765 1759 1809 1781 1715 1587 1454 1642 1353 1206 2002 683 1855 1901 1822 1778 1720 1718 1766 1815 1575 1491 1513 1361 1205 2003 677 1839 1885 1806 1756 1733 1680 1677 1802 1668 1480 1551 1255 1210 2004 671 1823 1869 1791 1741 1712 1694 1640 1713 1655 1569 1541 1287 1116 2005 665 1808 1853 1775 1726 1698 1673 1653 1671 1574 1558 1634 1275 1145 SpcI Schools totals 162 93 89 156 64 53 154 65 63 154 78 66 155 69 60 154 71 63 24876 24665 24234 23783 23339 22944 154 73 62 154 71 63 154 71 63 154 72 63 154 71 63 46 46 46 46 46 46 22685 22491 22307 22111 21996 46 24922 24711 24280 23829 23385 22990 22731 46 46 46 46 22537 22353 22157 22042 Table DS-1, Page 1 of 2 II Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I H II 11 Impact of Middle School Enrollment Middle School (Option #1) 6th 7th 8th Ungraded 6th 7th \u0026amp; 8th totals elem@1/6 jr. hi @2/3 Middle School (Option #2) 7th 8th Ungraded 7th \u0026amp; 8th totals jr. hi @2/3 High Schools 9th 10th 11th 12th Ungraded 9th jr. hi @1/3 sr. hi @1/3 totals 1797 1840 1791 1796 1821 1789 1803 1818 1671 1664 1830 1667 1707 1687 1679 1688 1730 1548 1781 1715 1587 1766 1815 1575 1677 1802 1668 1640 1713 1655 1653 1671 1574 27 62 5517 26 43 5475 26 43 5361 26 52 5239 26 46 5145 26 47 5039 26 49 5157 26 47 5229 26 47 5220 26 48 5082 26 47 4971 1840 1791 1821 1789 1818 1671 1830 1667 1687 1679 1730 1548 1715 1587 1815 1575 1802 1668 1713 1655 1671 1574 1227 4858 1214 4824 1212 4701 1220 4717 1125 4491 1153 4431 1143 4445 1210 4600 1201 4671 1142 4510 1114 4359 1899 1946 1598 1435 1846 1917 1608 1426 1680 1921 1597 1432 1569 1749 1594 1423 1565 1633 1450 1418 1578 1629 1355 1289 1454 1642 1353 1206 1491 1513 1361 1205 1480 1551 1255 1210 1569 1541 1287 1116 1558 1634 1275 1145 31 89 6998 21 53 6871 22 63 6715 26 66 6427 23 60 6149 24 63 5938 24 62 5741 24 63 5657 24 63 5583 24 63 5600 24 63 5699 H H H n n n II H Assumptions: 1. Ungraded elementary enrollment is pro-rated evenly among grades 1 through 6. 2. Ungraded junior high enrollment is pro-rated evenly among grades 7, 8, and 9. 3. Ungraded senior high enrollment is pro-rated evenly among grades 10, 11, and 12. 4. Special school enrollment is assumed to remain constant and students in this program are housed in facilities other than those included in this survey, and therefore, do not impact enrollment projections. H a Table DS-1, Page 2 of 2r ibH Educational Study FS? teWBLittle Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/1 TABLE 4-A PROJECTIONS 1995-1999 Grade Level Pre4\u0026lt; Kindergarten 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Ungraded Total 1994 Current \"^26 2060 1990 1914 1796 1895 1842 1797 1949 1966 1843 1930 1601 1548 338 25195 1995 575 2056 2146 1855 1824 1770 1844 1795 1847 1798 1791 1897 1620 1403 273 24494 1996 564 1951 2126 2000 1768 1798 1722 1797 1843 1702 1638 1844 1593 1419 283 24048 1997 566 1911 2017 1982 1906 1743 1749 1678 1847 1698 1550 1687 1545 1395 299 23573 1998 562 1923 1976 1880 1888 1878 1696 1704 1724 1703 1546 1596 1413 1353 285 23127 1999 557 1898 1989 1842 1791 1861 1828 1652 1749 1589 1551 1592 1341 1237 287 22764 TABLE 4-B PROJECTIONS 2000-2005 I Grade Level Pre^K Kindergarten 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Ungraded Total 2000 552 1882 1962 1853 1755 1765 1811 1781 1697 1611 1447 1597 1338 1175 292 22518 2001 546 1865 1945 1829 1766 1730 1719 1765 1831 1564 1467 1489 1341 1173 287 22317 2002 541 1849 1928 1812 1742 1740 1684 1675 1815 1688 1424 1510 1252 1175 288 22123 2003 536 1833 1911 1796 1726 1717 1694 1641 1723 1674 1537 1466 1271 1097 288 21910 2004 531 1818 1894 1780 1710 1702 1672 1651 1686 1589 1524 1583 1232 1114 288 21774 2005 526 1802 1878 1764 1695 1686 1657 1629 1698 1555 1447 1569 1329 1080 288 21603 Page 10Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I TABLE 5 Elementary Schools with High Value Scores and Estimated Capacity for Each School Value Score Estimated Permanent Operating Capacity ! i I I 1 I I Baseline Brady Carver Magnet Cloverdale Forest Park Fulbright Garland Geyer Springs Gibbs Magnet McDermott Mablevale Otter Creek Rightsell Rockefeller Romine Terry Washington Watson Western Hills Williams Wilson Martin Luther King Chicot (new) 755 820 850 765 765 850 815 870 835 885 900 820 790 915 785 755 895 780 820 770 765 940 Not Rated 400 445 598 434 430 565 297 321 341 510 527 367 264 426 409 523 782 491 340 501 421 634 523 10549 e:ltl-rock\\ed-survey\\table5 Page 11Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan 3D/I Table 6 Elementary Schools with Average Value Scores and Estimated Capacity for Each School Value Score Estimated Permanent Operating Capacity Badgett Bale Booker Magnet David O. Dodd Franklin Meadowcliff Pulaski Heights 735 725 735 730 705 710 705 Total Operating Capacity this Group L w 219 335 641 369 472 448 380 2864 Table 7 Elementary Schools Subject to Alternate Use Or Closure Estimated Capacity for Each n I School Value Score Estimated Permanent Operating Capacity II I n Jefferson Woodruff Ish Fair Park Wakefield Mitchell 680 670 660 685 690 600 445 316 0 340 524 283 i Total Operating Capacity this Group 1908 I I Garland (Previously shown on Table 5) 815 297 L E Page 12 Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/1 RANKING BY EVALUATION SCORES Table-ES-1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT TYPE OF SCHOOL EDUCATIO RATING FACILITY RATING SCORE NO NAME TOTAL COST ESTIMATE PRIORITY 1 ESTIMATE ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET 900-1000 * HIGH SCHOOLS NONE HIGHLY * JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS SATISFACTORY NONE * ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS 700-900 ACCEPTABLE 1 2 1 2 3 4 * 1 2 w 1 * 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ' 15 ' 16 17 18 ' 19 20 21 ' 22 23 24 ' 26 I 27 ! 28 I MARTIN L KING WASHINGTON HIGH SCHOOLS PARKVIEW J.A.FAIR HALL McClellan Subtotal JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS CLOVERDALE FOREST HEIGHTS VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL METROPOLITAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS CARVER MAGNET FULBRIGHT GEYER SPRINGS ROCKEFELLER incentive WESTERN HILLS OTTER CREEK BRADY McDermott MABELVALE GIBBS MAGNET baseline ROMINE WATSON FOREST PARK TERRY WILSON BALE DAVID O DODD BOOKER MAGNET WILLIAMS RIGHTSELL incentive BADGETT CLOVERDALE FRANKLIN incentive PULASKI HEIGHTS MEADOWCLIFF T Subtotal I 940 895 82S 760 780 700 755 755 830 850 850 870 915 820 820 820 885 900 835 755 785 780 765 755 765 725 730 735 770 790 735 765 705 705 710 1 T 986 968 814 872 704 695 890 711 724 896 862 818 759 823 814 806 733 689 752 801 740 727 742 747 737 771 755 746 708 688 721 680 690 680 623 $239,042 $313,822 $552,864 $837,872 $1,725,309 $2,182,064 $3,489,032 $687,389 $2,410,310 $3,488,387 $378,889 $484,019 $321,017 $399,444 $850,067 $674,313 $476,919 $689,136 $1,568,674 $215,003 $1,111,915 $1,660,421 $937,532 $752,687 $498,742 $933,698 $1,200,466 $954,119 $892,564 $723,963 $645,652 $666,504 $481,989 $1,845,175 $1,389,146 $1,138,095 $36,710,512 $0 $7,807 $7,807 $8,690 $411,771 $453,800 $579,059 $228,836 $822,810 $412,381 $5,028 $26,102 $36,857 $133,487 $89,413 $48,281 $220 $94,614 $334,844 $5,446 $156,719 $233,762 $308,388 $91,391 $96,792 $23,358 $341,296 $12,275 $154,780 $211,937 $61,724 $145,216 $45,062 $214,024 $302,995 $71,174 $6,162,534 $1,773,977 $2,258,943 $4,032,920 $3,678,656 $3,041,886 $3,233,040 $3,366,982 $1,957,408 $2,464,108 $1,334,595 $2,134,430 $1,544,004 $823,012 $1,955,387 $926,227 $938,437 $1,147,571 $1,322,150 $1,343,716 $1,320,131 $972,972 $1,364,597 $1,202,740 $1,130,600 $1,363,947 $1,159,664 $1,081,655 $916,524 $2,342,801 $1,873,461 $1,029,820 $704,527 $1,107,190 $1,838,099 $1,004,237 $1,144,114 $52,768,688 Table-ES-1 Page 1RANKING BY EVALUATION SCORES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT TYPE OF SCHOOL EDUCATIO RATING SCORE NO NAME 600-700 * HIGH SCHOOLS NEED OF REPAIR 400-600 POOR CONDITIONS RE-STUDY T 5 * 3 4 5 6 7 * 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 8 * * 1 CENTRAL 665 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS MANN MAGNET HENDERSON SOUTHWEST PULASKI HEIGHTS DUNBAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS GARLAND incentive JEFFERSON WOODRUFF ISH FAIR PARK WAKEFIELD MITCHELL incentive HIGH SCHOOLS NONE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS MABELVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS NONE ALTERNATE LEARNING ALTERNATE LEARNING CNTR Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I Table-ES-1 FACILITY RATING TOTAL COST ESTIMATE PRIORITY 1 ESTIMATE ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET 687 $5,763,718 $3,224,480 $4,998,321 685 630 665 680 640 815 680 670 660 685 690 600 565 475 T Position ranking is based on an average of the Education and Facility Rating scores in | decending order by score groups I 1 726 771 691 616 652 629 764 772 752 718 693 683 682 628 4- $1,414,500 $845,431 $1,483,632 $1,620,183 $3,855,668 $120,619 $219,472 $18,690 $290,309 $1,476,235 $3,264,881 $3,049,193 $2,133,841 $2,323,492 $2,287,694 $1,373,658 $1,814,531 $212,098 $656,776 $714,626 $1,238,092 $579,516 $21,572,429 $2,263,241 $1,183,270 $3,446,511 $62,282,316 $63,502 $953,937 $37,892 $10,800 $35,836 $126,957 $139,245 $1,246,993 $1,437,864 $735,334 $1,572,822 $924,020 $1,178,781 $1,242,719 $6,717,973 $26,395,955 $277,011 $415,614 $692,625 $13,580,939 $2,162,579 $445,144 $2,607,723 $85,805,286 Table-ES-1 Page 2CAPACITY ANALYSIS SUMMARY OF BUILDINGS BY GROUPS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT A B C D TYPE OF SCHOOL LU NO NAME HIGH SCHOOLS 1 CENTRAL 2 HALL 3 PARKVIEW 4 J.A.FAIR 5 McClellan TOTAL HIGH SCHOOLS Average Size VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL 1 METROPOLITAN TOTAL VTS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 1 CLOVERDALE 2 DUNBAR 3 FOREST HEIGHTS 4 HENDERSON 5 MABELVALE 6 MANN MAGNET 7 PULASKI HEIGHTS 8 SOUTHWEST TOTAL JR HIGH SCHOOLS Average Size ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS 1 BADGETT 2 BALE 3 BASELINE 4 BOOKER MAGNET 5 BRADY 6 CARVER MAGNET 7 CHICOT 8 CLOVERDALE 0\u0026gt; Oi co z o V) Oi LU Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I Table ES-3 E F G H J K PUPIL STATIONS CO z o CAPACITY CO It UJ s UI uT Q CO z o o \u0026lt; Q UJ CO 3 O X w UJ o \u0026lt;2. CO 10,11,12 10,11,12 10,11,12 10.11.12 10.11,12 0 0 7,8.9 7,8.9 7,8.9 7,8.9 7,8.9 7,8.9 7.8.9 7,8.9 0 PK-6 K-6 PK-6 K-6 PK-6 K-6 K-6 PK-6 z UJ S o It z UJ 1,637 1,031 800 917 897 5,282 1,058 0 0 647 707 780 917 585 845 771 610 5,862 733 177 309 326 573 408 588 503 392 UJ co It o Q. 3 o 0 0 0 2 Single S.ID.+ann 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5D. IS 0 2Double 2D. IS 0 2 Double 3 Double 0 0 2 Double 0 0 0 2649 1629 1344 1419 1421 8462 0 0 1111 1162 1409 1357 1054 1437 1160 1179 9869 230 353 421 716 468 671 550 457 m (t o S Vi z o W o Q. 0 0 0 0 60 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 235 0 99 100 434 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0. z UI z \u0026lt; S Ct UJ z UJ (t (t o o 2649 1629 1344 1419 1361 8,402 1,680 0 0 1111 1162 1409 1357 819 1437 1061 1079 9,435 1,173 230 353 421 716 468 671 550 457 \u0026lt; U \u0026lt; z o 2 UJ O z UJ It It 3 u 2252 1385 1142 1206 1157 7,142 0 0 1000 1046 1268 1221 737 1293 955 971 8,492 219 335 400 680 445 637 523 434 z LU s UJ LU oi \u0026lt; o UJ Vi LU o LU LU s o (0 z LU s co D J Q -151 151 0 0 -358 358 -39 -39 o O z o UJ O LU co D Q z UJ It (t 3 o @85% utiliz. 2252 1385 991 1206 1157 6,991 1,338 0 0 @90% utiliz. 1000 1046 1268 1221 737 935 955 971 8,134 1,017 @95% utiliz. 219 335 400 641 445 598 523 434 OQ o O CO CO UJ o X UJ 615 354 191 289 260 1,709 342 0 0 353 339 488 304 152 90 184 361 2,272 284 42 26 74 68 37 10 20 42 Table ES-3 Pagel o z o s o D CQ U Ct CO A 1 2 5 8 12 4 ' 15 I 9 1 13 I 16 1 3 10 11 19 17 22 6 18 21 27 31CAPACITY ANALYSIS SUMMARY OF BUILDINGS BY GROUPS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT A B C D TYPE OF SCHOOL UJ NO NAME ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (cont) 9 DAVID 0 DODD 10 FAIR PARK 11 FOREST PARK 12 FRANKLIN 13 FULBRIGHT 14 GARLAND 15 GEYER SPRINGS 16 GIBBS MAGNET 17 JEFFERSON 18 MARTIN L KING 19 MCDERMOTT 20 MABELVALE 21 MEADOWCLIFF 22 MITCHELL 23 OTTER CREEK 24 PULASKI HEIGHTS 25 RIGHTSELL 26 ROCKEFELLER 27 ROMINE 28 TERRY 29 WAKEFIELD 30 WASHINGTON 31 WATSON 32 WESTERN HILLS 33 WILLIAMS MAGNET 34 WILSON 35 WOODRUFF 36 ALTERNATE LEARNING CNTR TOTAL ELEMENTARY Average Size | TOTAL ALL SCHOOLS I Oi co z o co 0^ UJ Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I Table ES-3 E F G H J K PUPIL STATIONS CO z o CAPACITY Q UJ co D o X UJ Q z UJ S O a Z UJ s UJ _J ffi s E O CL CO o K-6 K-6 K-6 PK-6 K-6 PK-6 PK-6 K-6 K-6 PK-6 K-6 PK-6 K-6 PK-6 K-6 K-6 PK-6 PK-6 PK-6 K-6 K-6 PK-6 PK-6 K-6 K-6 K-6 PK-6 298 282 432 443 542 282 300 293 502 551 494 474 411 272 359 420 229 403 323 559 413 687 427 317 474 345 243 14,051 401 I 25,195 0 3 Double 2 Single 0 ISingle 0 0 2 Double 3 Double 0 0 0 1 Double 0 0 1 Double 1 Double 0 2D, IS 1 Single ID, IS 0 ID. IS 0 2D, 2S 2 Single 0 0 0 388 386 481 497 595 313 338 358 552 667 537 555 472 298 386 456 278 448 431 582 552 823 517 358 537 443 333 16,447 i 34,778 I co IX UJ I UJ co 0^ o Q. Z \"Z o I co 0 28 28 0 0 0 0 0 84 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 224 lU Q CO z o I CO D 0. z UJ z \u0026lt; s ce UJ Q. z UJ o o 388 358 453 497 595 313 338 358 468 667 537 555 472 298 386 400 278 446 431 554 552 823 517 358 537 443 333 16,223 464 34,060 o \u0026lt; \u0026lt; o z o I- UJ Q. o z UJ o\n 369 340 430 472 565 297 321 340 445 634 510 527 448 283 367 380 264 426 409 526 524 782 491 340 510 421 316 15,412 31,045 z UJ s UJ UI O' o \u0026lt; o UJ co UJ o UJ UJ S O Vi I- z UJ s Vi Q X 1 -9 -86 595 o o \u0026lt; z o p UJ 0. o UJ co D Q \u0026lt; z UJ a: z D 369 340 430 472 565 297 321 341 445 634 510 527 448 283 367 380 264 426 409 526 524 782 491 340 501 421 316 15,326 436 30,450 OQ o \u0026lt; O CO CO UJ o X UJ 71 58 .2 29 23 15 21 48 -57 83 16 53 37 11 8 -40 35 23 86 -33 111 95 64 23 27 76 73 1,275 36 5,255 I Table ES-3 Page 2 o z o z Q co o 5 W A 32 23 24 25 48 26 37 27 30 35 20 46 33 34 10 38 39 50 40 47 51 42 32 29 43 44 45 14UTILIZATION RATIOS SUMMARY OF BUILDINGS BY GROUPS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT TYPE OF SCHOOL UJ NO NAME HIGH SCHOOLS 1 CENTRAL 2 HALL 3 PARKVIEW MAGNET 4 J .A.FAIR 5 MCCLELLAN TOTAL HIGH SCHOOLS Average Size VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL 6 METROPOLITAN TOTAL VTS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 1 CLOVERDALE 2 DUNBAR 3 FOREST HEIGHTS 4 HENDERSON 5 MABELVALE 6 MANN MAGNET 7 PULASK! HEIGHTS 8 SOUTHWEST TOTAL JR HIGH SCHOOLS Average Size ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS 1 BADGETT 2 BALE 3 BASELINE 4 BOOKER MAGNET 5 BRADY 6 CARVER MAGNET 7 CHICOT 0\u0026gt; O) (0 z o Vi a: UJ Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I Table-ES-4 WITH PORTABLES WITHOUT PORTABLES TRAILERS TRAILERS (f) UJ co UJ Q o UJ (Z) o o UJ Q o z UI S O z UJ Q 10,11.12 10,11.12 10,11,12 10,11,12 10,11,12 0 0 7,8.9 7,8.9 7.8.9 7,8.9 7,8.9 7,8.9 7.8.9 7.8.9 0 PK-6 K-6 PK-6 K-6 PK-6 K-6 1,637 1,031 800 917 897 5,282 1,056 0 0 647 707 780 917 585 845 771 610 5,862 733 177 309 326 573 408 588 503 UJ ffi 5 o z o UJ O 0 0 0 2 Single 1S,1D,+annex 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5D, IS 0 2Double 1 Single 0 2 Double 3 Double 0 0 2 Double 0 not in service 1206 1208 2414 0 0 949 1044 1061 3054 219 335 445 o s Z o I- 3 @85% utiliz. 76% 74% 75% 0 0 62% 74% 57% 64% 81% 92% 92% o \u0026lt; Q \u0026lt; z 2 I- UJ O Q UJ CO Q 2252 1385 1142 1206 1157 7,142 1,428 0 0 1000 1064 1268 1221 737 1293 955 971 8,509 1,064 219 335 400 680 445 637 2 s z o Z3 @85% utiliz. 73% 74% 70% 76% 78% 74% 0 0 @90% utiliz. 65% 66% 62% 75% 79% 65% 81% 63% 79% @95% utiliz. 81% 92% 82% 84% 92% 92% not in service 6 z 0 z Q m g a: w Q 1 2 5 8 12 4 15 7 9 13 16 3 10 11 19 17 22 6 18 21 27 Table-ES-4 Page 1UTILIZATION RATIOS SUMMARY OF BUILDINGS BY GROUPS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT TYPE OF SCHOOL Oi Oi UJ fA Z o \u0026lt;0 UJ NO NAME ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (continued) 6 CLOVERDALE 9 DAVID 0 DODD 10 FAIR PARK 11 FOREST PARK 12 FRANKLIN 13 FULBRIGHT 14 GARLAND 15 GEYER SPRINGS 16 GIBBS MAGNET 17 JEFFERSON 18 MARTIN L KING 19 MCDERMOTT 20 MABELVALE 21 iMEADOWCLIFF 22 MITCHELL 23 OTTER CREEK 24 PULASKI HEIGHTS 25 RIGHTSELL 26 ROCKEFELLER 27 ROMINE 28 TERRY 29 WAKEFIELD 30 WASHINGTON 31 WATSON 32 WESTERN HILLS 33 WILLIAMS MAGNET 34 WILSON 35 WOODRUFF 36 ALTERNATE LEARNING CTR TOTAL ELEMENTARY Average Size TOTAL ALL SCHOOLS Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I Table-ES-4 WITH PORTABLES TRAILERS WITHOUT PORTABLES TRAILERS V) w UJ O o \u0026lt; o o UJ co 3 O Z (0 UJ o s o \u0026lt; Z UJ S o z UJ PK-6 K-6 K-6 K-6 PK-6 K-6 PK-6 PK-6 K-6 K-6 PK-6 K-6 PK-6 K-6 PK-6 K-6 K-6 PK-6 PK-6 PK-6 K-6 K-6 PK-6 PK-6 K-6 K-6 K-6 PK-6 0 0 392 298 282 432 443 542 282 300 293 502 551 494 474 411 272 359 I 420 229 403 323 559 413 687 427 317 474 345 243 14,051 401 4 I I 25,195 I 2 UJ O m \u0026lt; ft O z O I- UJ o 0 0 3 Double 2 Double 0 ISingle 0 0 2 Double 3 Double 0 0 0 1 Double 0 0 1 Double 1 Double 0 2D. IS 1 Single ID, IS 0 ID, IS 0 2D. 2S 2 Single 0 0 0 367 457 565 340 524 448 433 264 409 553 524 491 510 421 7.306 12,774 4. O I- 2 z o 77% 95% 96% 86% 96% 92% 97% 87% 79% 101% 79% 87% 93% 82% \u0026lt; z o 2 UJ Q. o UJ CO 3 o 434 369 340 430 472 565 297 321 340 445 634 510 627 448 283 367 380 264 426 409 526 524 782 491 340 510 421 316 14,889 425 30,541 I o I z o s 3 @95% utiliz. 90% 81% 83% 100% 94% 96% 95% 93% 86% 113% 87% 97% 90% 92% 96% 98% 111% 87% 95% 79% 106% 79% 88% 87% 93% 93% 82% 77% 88% 6 z o z o CD o 0^ \u0026lt;/) Q 31 32 23 24 25 48 26 37 27 30 35 20 46 33 34 10 38 39 50 40 47 51 42 32 29 43 44 45 14 Table-ES-4 Page 2Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I ENROLLMENT ANALYSIS 1995 SUMMARY OF SCHOOLS BY GRADE LEVELS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT TYPE OF SCHOOL Table ES-7 (95) ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTION BY GRADES/ BY SCHOOLS I I 2 I 3 I NO HIGH SCHOOLS 1 2 3 4 5 CENTRAL HALL PARKVIEW J.A.FAIR McClellan TOTAL HIGH SCHOOLS PK I 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 I UNGR 45 17 18 15 20 115 625 330 310 337 344 527 287 268 241 275 389 269 259 280 238 1946 1598 1436 5 25 0 32 27 89 0 1 0 0 0 4 5 6 7 I 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL 1 metropolitan TOTAL VTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 CLOVERDALE DUNBAR FOREST HEIGHTS HENDERSON MABELVALE MANN MAGNET PULASKI HEIGHTS SOUTHWEST TOTAL JR HIGH SCHOOLS 199 251 241 234 152 291 272 200 192 234 222 252 157 281 266 187 214 247 271 279 169 275 233 211 1840 1791 1899 0 0 0 4 0 25 27 13 0 10 14 93 Table ES-7 Page 1 of 2ENROLLMENT ANALYSIS 1995 SUMMARY OF SCHOOLS BY GRADE LEVELS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT TYPE OF SCHOOL NO ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS 1 BADGETT Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTION BY GRADES/ BY SCHOOLS PK 1 I 2 I 3 I 4~r 5 I 6 Table ES-7 (95) I 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 I UNG'R 2 BALE 3 BASELINE 4 BOOKER MAGNET 5 BRADY 6 CARVER MAGNET 7 CHICOT 8 CLOVERDALE 9 DAVID O DODD 10 FAIR PARK 11 FOREST PARK 12 FRANKLIN 13 FULBRIGHT 14 GARLAND 15 GEYER SPRINGS 16 GIBBS MAGNET 17 ISH 18 JEFFERSON 19 MARTIN L KING 19 McDermott 20 MABELVALE 21 MEADOWCLIFF 22 MITCHELL 23 OTTER CREEK 24 PULASKI HEIGHTS 25 RIGHTSELL 26 ROCKEFELLER 27 ROMINE 28 TERRY 29 WAKEFIELD 30 WASHINGTON 31 WATSON 32 WESTERN HILLS 33 WILLIAMS 34 WILSON 35 WOODRUFF 36 ALTERNATE LEARNING CNTR TOTAL ELEMENTARY 36 35 36 17 0 18 53 36 69 18 37 38 39 59 78 60 60 59 78 39 39 60 63 78 29 39 40 22 47 51 90 62 66 72 69 32 45 67 75 76 37 41 48 23 46 31 79 64 91 56 55 39 31 68 51 71 30 46 45 17 50 41 93 53 99 46 51 45 26 64 38 64 35 35 42 28 36 30 77 37 107 60 50 29 42 50 44 65 29 43 40 20 40 36 92 50 105 61 51 44 24 73 39 75 32 26 47 18 41 37 95 44 101 58 45 50 27 53 40 82 38 43 45 8 13 6 0 7 0 22 1 16 0 0 12 7 7 0 0 71 17 18 18 93 33 53 35 18 36 60 103 60 59 57 37 40 57 30 58 52 75 57 78 59 40 60 55 40 62 86 69 74 63 38 48 61 30 53 45 72 74 96 67 47 73 61 32 74 57 73 58 61 37 45 67 19 42 47 70 61 83 63 43 75 61 38 73 68 70 52 50 23 48 67 37 47 37 98 47 79 55 49 72 46 41 72 47 66 63 66 24 41 54 26 40 26 67 66 71 62 48 81 50 23 77 51 75 73 54 36 61 49 39 39 20 72 63 105 57 49 75 28 22 74 48 74 55 49 34 56 51 20 34 32 82 61 87 46 I 39 72 44 22 9 0 0 9 0 10 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 4 0 0 0 21 0 747 1935 2051 1900 1858 1760 1860 1797 0 0 0 0 0 0 162 TOTAL ALL SCHOOLs| 747 2050 2051 1900 1858 1760 1860 1797 1840 1791 1899 1946 1598 1435 344 Table ES-7 Page 2 of 2Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I ENROLLMENT ANALYSIS 1995 COMPARISON OF JR. vs MIDDLE SCHOOLS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Table ES-8 (95) TYPE OF SCHOOL ENROLL OPTIONS #1\u0026amp; NO HIGH SCHOOLS TOTAL PK OPTION #1 6TH-8TH enroll capcty delta OPTION #2 7TH-8TH enroll capcty delta OPTIONS #1 \u0026amp;tf2 k-9TH-12 enroll capcty delta 1 2 3 4 5 CENTRAL HALL PARKVIEW J.A.FAIR McClellan TOTAL HIGH SCHOOLS 1591 928 855 905 904 5183 45 17 18 15 20 115 ASSUMPTIONS 2172 1286 1149 1216 1202 7026 2256 1389 991 1206 1157 6999 1. If 85% factor is deleted capacity is adequate 83 103 -158 -10 -45 -27 VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL 1 METROPOLITAN TOTAL VTS 0 2. If the 151 deduct, is removed from Parkview capacity, capacity exists in all buildings and overall factor = 83.8% 3. Indications are that middle school is possible by 1996 4 9th grade has been prorated to % of building capacity (all assumptions do not consider class choice loading) JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 CLOVERDALE DUNBAR FOREST HEIGHTS HENDERSON MABELVALE MANN MAGNET PULASKI HEIGHTS SOUTHWEST TOTAL JR HIGH SCHOOLS 609 732 759 792 491 847 781 612 5623 652 742 745 770 579 829 805 658 5,778 1000 1046 1268 1221 737 935 955 971 8,134 348 304 523 452 158 107 150 313 2,356 391 485 463 486 309 572 538 387 3,631 1000 1046 1268 1221 737 935 955 971 609 561 805 735 428 363 417 584 8,134 4,503 Table ES-8 Page 1 of 2ENROLLMENT ANALYSIS 1995 COMPARISON OF JR. vs MIDDLE SCHOOLS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT TYPE OF SCHOOL ENROLL OPTIONS #1\u0026amp; NO ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS TOTAL PK Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I Table ES-8 (95) OPTION #1 6TH-STH enroll capcty delta OPTION #2 7TH-8TH enroll capcty delta OPTIONS #1 \u0026amp;#2 k-9TH-12 enroll capcty delta 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 BADGETT BALE BASELINE BOOKER MAGNET BRADY CARVER MAGNET CHICOT CLOVERDALE DAVID O DODD 10 FAIR PARK 11 FOREST PARK 12 FRANKLIN 13 FULBRIGHT 14 GARLAND 15 GEYER SPRINGS 16 GIBBS MAGNET 17 ISH 18 JEFFERSON 19 MARTIN L KING 19 MCDERMOTT 20 MABELVALE 21 MEADOWCLIFF 22 MITCHELL 23 OTTER CREEK 24 PULASKI HEIGHTS 25 RIGHTSELL 26 ROCKEFELLER 27 ROMINE 28 TERRY 29 WAKEFIELD 30 WASHINGTON 31 WATSON 32 WESTERN HILLS 33 WILLIAMS 34 WILSON 35 WOODRUFF 36 ALTERNATE LEARNING CNTR TOTAL ELEMENTARY 210 347 327 604 394 629 452 453 294 270 435 431 518 255 310 307 0 501 531 487 460 400 257 339 406 219 406 302 536 429 656 444 315 508 384 254 0 14070 184 293 284 509 343 528 372 407 228 243 382 379 429 210 267 262 0 418 483 413 396 351 213 283 355 199 372 260 454 368 565 398 276 436 319 232 0 12111 18 41 37 95 44 101 58 45 50 27 53 40 82 38 43 45 0 74 48 74 55 49 34 56 51 20 34 32 82 61 87 46 39 72 44 22 0 1797 219 335 400 641 445 598 523 434 0 369 350 430 472 565 297 321 341 459 634 510 527 448 283 367 380 264 426 409 526 524 782 491 340 501 421 316 0 15350 35 42 116 132 102 70 151 27 -228 126 -32 51 43 355 30 59 341 41 151 97 131 97 70 84 25 65 54 149 72 156 217 93 64 65 102 84 0 3239 No of schools] 29 25 TOTAL ALL SCHOOLS] 24,876 Table ES-8 Page 2 of 2Attendance Zoner H a a Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I ATTENDANCE ZONE COMPOSITION (ATTENDANCE ZONE MODIFIED) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Table AZ-1 \u0026gt; SCHOOL OPTION \"M II BADGETT BALE (REVISED) BASELINE (REVISED) BOOKER MAGNET BRADY CARVER MAGNET CHICOT CLOVERDALE (REVISED) DAVID O DODD FAIR PARK (CLOSED) FOREST PARK (REVISED) FRANKLIN FULBRIGHT GARLAND (CLOSED) GEYER SPRINGS GIBBS MAGNET (X UJ z O \u0026lt; CD o \u0026lt; 0. \u0026lt; co o z O UJ t X 5 O \u0026lt; CQ \u0026lt; o Z UJ o ix UJ 0. UJ Q. o ELEMENTARY SCH OOLS 56 49 138 129 101 143 200 152 152 143 74 69 141 129 162 268 281 25 21 353 328 26 61 104 104 89 257 239 268 442 160 138 395 368 369 585 65% 64% 65% 65% 73% 76% 219 219 335 335 400 400 641 179 118 358 335 421 395 173 156 194 137 171 449 418 287 255 313 226 379 379 270 510 478 495 464 314 285 356 405 452 474 439 640 583 339 287 483 47% 44% 70% 70% 85% 85% 55% 55% 54% 34% 38% 95% 95% 45% 44% 92% 79% 78% 445 445 598 523 523 434 434 369 369 340 430 430 472 472 565 565 297 321 321 341 TABLE AZ-1 PAGE 1Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I ATTENDANCE ZONE COMPOSITION (ATTENDANCE ZONE MODIFIED) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Table AZ-1 \u0026gt; SCHOOL ISH (CLOSED) JEFFERSON (CLOSED) MARTIN L KING McDermott (REVISED) MABELVALE MEADOWCLIFF MITCHELL (CLOSED) OTTER CREEK (REVISED) PULASKI HEIGHTS RIGHTSELL (REVISED) ROCKEFELLER ROMINE TERRY (REVISED) WAKEFIELD (CLOSED) WASHINGTON WATSON WESTERN HILLS (REVISED) x LU I o iu X 5 o \u0026lt; m \u0026lt; o 340 7 4 297 276 167 153 170 155 11 336 306 254 235 18 14 27 26 34 32 557 408 106 16 15 110 107 122 119 250 462 465 169 302 356 315 316 278 317 160 135 92 80 316 306 222 204 390 368 229 282 394 666 574 427 414 193 186 590 469 469 466 578 523 468 486 433 328 496 441 346 315 334 320 249 230 424 400 786 690 500 682 589 537 521 315 305 O \u0026lt; m Z lU o x LU Q. 42% 99% 99% 36% 52% 68% 67% 65% 64% 97% 32% 31% 27% 25% 95% 96% 89% 89% 92% 92% 29% 41% 79% 98% 97% 80% 79% 61% 61% O \u0026lt; a. \u0026lt; O o z \u0026lt; X LU Q. O 445 634 634 510 510 527 527 448 448 283 367 367 380 380 264 264 426 426 409 409 526 526 524 782 782 491 491 340 340 TABLE AZ-1 PAGE 2Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/1 ATTENDANCE ZONE COMPOSITION (ATTENDANCE ZONE MODIFIED) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Table AZ-1 \u0026gt; SCHOOL WILLIAMS MAGNET WILSON WOODRUFF (CLOSED) PROPOSED NEW SCHOOL PROPOSED NEW SCHOOL OPTION \"M II CLOVERDALE DUNBAR FOREST HEIGHTS HENDERSON MABELVALE (CLOSED) MANN MAGNET PULASKI HEIGHTS SOUTHWEST 0^ UJ X O LU I 5 o \u0026lt; m \u0026lt; O 202 199 60 287 274 85 489 473 145 28 449 614 642 167 616 JR HIGH SCHOOLS 127 200 139 129 255 222 247 209 148 314 295 281 313 ie o \u0026lt; m z LU O q: UJ Q. 59% 58% 59% 96% 27% o \u0026lt; Q. \u0026lt; O o z \u0026lt; q: UJ Q. o 501 421 421 316 0 0 657 741 585 517 452 574 685 542 415 784 941 724 646 707 796 932 751 563 84% 79% 81% 80% 64% 72% 73% 72% 74% 1000 1000 1046 1046 1268 1268 1221 1221 737 416 378 591 535 730 673 872 848 57% 56% 68% 63% 935 955 955 971 971 TABLE AZ-1 PAGESLittle Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I ATTENDANCE ZONE COMPOSITION (ATTENDANCE ZONE MODIFIED) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Table AZ-1 \u0026gt; SCHOOL OPTION \"M CENTRAL FAIR HALL McClellan II PARKVIEW MAGNET OPTION \"T BADGETT BALE BASELINE BOOKER MAGNET BRADY CARVER MAGNET CHICOT CLOVERDALE DAVID O DODD FAIR PARK 'll (REVISED) (REVISED) (REVISED) (REVISED) (CLOSED) O' UJ Z o UJ t z g O \u0026lt; _l m _i \u0026lt; o o \u0026lt; m I-z UJ o q: UJ Q. o \u0026lt; Q. \u0026lt; O o z a UJ Q. o HIGH SCHOOLS 575 496 257 242 404 333 211 272 1030 1164 579 491 533 420 882 755 1605 1660 836 733 937 753 1093 1027 64% 70% 69% 67% 57% 56% 81% 74% 5525 2252 1206 1206 1385 1385 1157 1157 991 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS 56 6 138 158 101 108 200 212 152 243 74 113 141 106 162 104 329 257 434 268 592 179 4 358 329 421 325 173 154 194 160 335 395 592 369 700 379 216 510 572 495 438 314 260 356 65% 65% 73% 73% 85% 47% 2% 70% 58% 85% 74% 55% 59% 54% 219 219 335 335 400 400 641 445 445 598 523 523 434 434 369 369 340 TABLE AZ-1 PAGE 4 Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I ATTENDANCE ZONE COMPOSITION (ATTENDANCE ZONE MODIFIED) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Table AZ-1 \u0026gt; SCHOOL FOREST PARK FRANKLIN (REVISED) FULBRIGHT n Q n H n a GARLAND (CLOSED) GEYER SPRINGS GIBBS MAGNET ISH JEFFERSON MARTIN L KING MCDERMOTT MABELVALE MEADOWCLIFF MITCHELL OTTER CREEK PULASKI HEIGHTS RIGHTSELL ROCKEFELLER (REVISED) (CLOSED) (CLOSED) (NOT USED) (NOT USED) (CLOSED) (REVISED) (NOT USED) (REVISED) QC UJ X o UJ t X 5 268 239 25 48 353 382 26 61 148 340 7 91 297 445 167 170 11 336 233 254 312 18 27 19 O \u0026lt; CQ O \u0026lt; Q. \u0026lt; O o z o \u0026lt; CQ \u0026lt; O Z UJ o IX UJ CL UJ Q. O 137 7 449 561 287 39 313 405 246 474 609 640 421 339 34% 3% 95% 92% 45% 9% 92% 430 430 472 472 565 565 297 226 519 250 462 378 169 35 356 316 317 160 60 92 144 316 222 451 287 667 590 469 469 466 480 523 486 328 496 293 346 456 334 249 470 79% 78% 42% 99% 81% 36% 7% 68% 65% 97% 32% 20% 27% 32% 95% 89% 96% 321 321 341 445 634 634 510 510 527 448 283 367 367 380 380 264 426 426 TABLE AZ-1 PAGE 5Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I ATTENDANCE ZONE COMPOSITION (ATTENDANCE ZONE MODIFIED) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Table AZ-1 \u0026gt; SCHOOL ROMINE (REVISED) TERRY (REVISED) WAKEFIELD (CLOSED) WASHINGTON WATSON (REVISED) WESTERN HILLS (REVISED) WILLIAMS MAGNET WILSON (NOT USED) WOODRUFF NEW SCHOOLS (NOT USED) (LOCATIONS TO BE DETERMINED) DC UJ X (J \u0026lt; m o \u0026lt; Q. \u0026lt; O \u0026lt;3 Z o UJ t X 5 34 173 557 506 106 16 13 110 139 122 240 202 60 128 125 O \u0026lt; _J CO \u0026lt; o Z UJ o DC UJ Q. \u0026lt; CC UJ Q. O 390 574 229 76 394 666 645 427 538 193 270 287 85 743 743 OPTION T JR. HIGH \u0026amp; HIGH SCHOOLS SAME OPTION M OPTION \"CII BADGETT (REVISED) BALE REVISED) 424 747 786 582 500 682 658 537 677 315 510 489 145 871 868 92% 77% 29% 13% 79% 98% 98% 80% 79% 61% 53% 59% 59% 85% 86% ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS 409 409 526 526 524 782 782 491 491 340 340 501 421 421 316 316 900 900 BASELINE 66 66 138 137 101 145 104 292 257 247 268 186 170 358 395 384 369 331 61% 82% 65% 64% 73% 56% 219 219 335 335 400 40 BOOKER MAGNET BRADY 200 300 179 55 379 355 47% 15% 641 445 445 TABLE AZ-1 PAGE 6 Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I ATTENDANCE ZONE COMPOSITION (ATTENDANCE ZONE MODIFIED) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Table AZ-1 H \u0026gt; SCHOOL CARVER MAGNET CHICOT CLOVERDALE (REVISED) DAVID O DODD (REVISED) FAIR PARK (CLOSED) FOREST PARK (REVISED) FRANKLIN (REVISED) FULBRIGHT GARLAND (CLOSED) GEYER SPRINGS (REVISED) GIBBS MAGNET ISH (CLOSED) JEFFERSON (CLOSED) MARTIN L KING McDermott MABELVALE MEADOWCLIFF (NOT USED) 0^ LU z O u] X g O \u0026lt; I OQ \u0026lt; O lx: o \u0026lt; I co I- z LU O QO LU Q. o \u0026lt; Q. \u0026lt; O O z LU Q. O 152 90 89 141 221 162 268 516 25 47 353 380 26 61 152 340 7 147 297 419 167 187 170 358 386 438 173 227 194 137 202 449 612 287 48 313 226 548 250 462 459 169 83 356 217 316 510 476 527 314 448 356 405 718 474 659 640 428 339 287 700 590 469 606 466 502 523 404 486 70% 81% 83% 55% 51% 54% 34% 28% 95% 93% 45% 11% 92% 79% 78% 42% 99% 76% 36% 17% 68% 54% 65% 598 523 523 434 434 369 369 340 430 430 472 472 565 565 297 321 321 341 445 634 634 510 510 527 527 448 TABLE AZ-1 PAGE?Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I ATTENDANCE ZONE COMPOSITION (ATTENDANCE ZONE MODIFIED) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Table AZ-1 \u0026gt;- SCHOOL MITCHELL (CLOSED) OTTER CREEK PULASKI HEIGHTS (NOT USED) RIGHTSELL (REVISED) ROCKEFELLER (REVISED) ROMINE (REVISED) TERRY WAKEFIELD (CLOSED) WASHINGTON WATSON WESTERN HILLS WILLIAMS MAGNET WILSON (NOT USED) WOODRUFF (CLOSED) PROPOSED NEW SCHOOL QC LU I O LU I g 11 336 304 254 18 20 27 88 34 94 557 399 106 16 98 110 22 122 182 202 60 83 o \u0026lt; m 317 160 66 92 316 531 222 587 390 536 229 87 394 666 667 427 419 193 394 287 85 635 \u0026lt; I- O 1- 328 496 370 346 334 551 249 675 424 630 786 486 500 682 765 537 441 315 576 489 145 718 o \u0026lt; -I m Z 111 o UJ CL 97% 32% 18% 27% 95% 96% 89% 87% 92% 85% 29% 18% 79% 98% 87% 80% 95% 61% 68% 59% 59% 88% o \u0026lt; Q. \u0026lt; O o z \u0026lt; q: UJ Q. o 283 367 367 380 264 264 426 426 409 409 526 526 524 782 782 491 491 340 340 501 421 316 TABLE AZ-1 PAGE 8II H Little Rock School District Facilities Master Plan Study 3D/I ATTENDANCE ZONE COMPOSITION II (ATTENDANCE ZONE MODIFIED) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Table AZ-1 II H \u0026gt; II 0^ UJ z O \u0026lt; CO o \u0026lt; a. \u0026lt; o o z II H tl II n II n a SCHOOL o UJ t z 5 o \u0026lt; 00 \u0026lt; 1- O z UJ o Qt UJ Q. \u0026lt; q: UJ Q. o OPTION \"C II JR HIGH SCHOOLS CLOVERDALE DUNBAR FOREST HEIGHTS HENDERSON MABELVALE MANN MAGNET PULASKI HEIGHTS SOUTHWEST (CLOSED) 127 195 139 19 255 609 247 174 148 657 602 585 746 452 462 685 433 415 784 797 724 765 707 1071 932 607 563 84% 76% 81% 98% 64% 43% 73% 71% 74% 1000 1000 1046 1046 1268 1268 1221 1221 737 314 110 281 264 416 473 591 582 730 583 872 846 51% 81% 68% 69% 935 955 955 971 971 OPTION C HIGH SCHOOLS SAME AS OPTION M TABLE AZ-1 PAGES\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1663","title":"Court Filings: District Court, affidavit of John W. Walker","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Walker, John W."],"dc_date":["1995-11-21"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Joshua Intervenors","Education--Arkansas","Educational law and legislation","Education--Economic aspects","Lawyers"],"dcterms_title":["Court Filings: District Court, affidavit of John W. Walker"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1663"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["37 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":["Walker, John W."],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors. I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,, I I I I I IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. V. LR-C-82-866 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KA THERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. AFFIDAVIT OF JOHN W. WALKER STATE OF ARKANSAS ) )ss. COUNTY OF LONOKE ) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS INTERVENOR$ INTERVENOR$ Come now the affiant, JOHN W. WALKER, who submits the following affidavit under oath: A. Educational and Professional Qualifications 1. I graduated from Arkansas AM\u0026N College in Pine Bluff, Arkansas in 1958 with a major in Sociology. In 1960, I was awarded a John Hay Whitney Opportunity Fellowship which I used to obtain a Master's Degree from New York University in Education (Human Relations) in 1961. In 1961, I enrolled in the Yale University Law School from which I received my law degree in 1964. At Yale Law School, in 1964, I was a finalist in the Thunnan Arnold Appellate Moot Court Competition. I have studied further at Fisk University (the Race Relations Institute) and at many legal training seminars which focused upon the subject of civil rights law in particular. 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2. In 1964, I was admitted to practice before the Bar of Arkansas. Subsequently, I was admitted to, and still practice before, the United States Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals for the Eighth, Fifth, Eleventh, and Tenth Circuits, the United States District Court, Western District of Texas, and the United States District Court, Eastern and Western District of Arkansas. 3. I completed a legal training internship in New York City with the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund (LDF) in September, 1965. In 1965, I opened a private general law practice in Little Rock which emphasized civil rights law. In 1968, Norman Chachkin (now of the LDF) and I opened one of the first integrated law firms in the South. That law firm has continued to be operated on an integrated basis since that time although it has undergone several name changes. My own work continues to emphasize civil rights legal activity. 4. I hold membership in the American and National Bar Associations, and the W. Harold Flowers and Pulaski County Bar Associations. From 1976 to 1982, I was a member of the Arkansas Board of Examiners. I have served as a member of the Federal Rules Advisory Committee of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. I am a member of the Board of Directors of the LDF in New York. 5. The following is a partial listing of major cases where I have been lead counsel: Employment Paxton v Union National Bank, 688 F. 2d. 522, 574 (8th Cir. 1982); Maney v Brinkley Municipal Water Works, 802 F 2d. 1073, 1076 (8th Cir. 1986); Rogers 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I v International Paper Co., 423 U.S. 809 (1975); Powell v Georgia Pacific Paper Company, Civ. Nos. 73-C-1 and E.D. 73-C-3 (Ark. 1993); Williams v Anderson, 562 F 2d. 1081 (8th Cir. 1977); Clark v Mann, 562 F 2d. 1104 (8th Cir. 1977); Parham v Southwestern Bell, 433 F 2d. 421 (8th Cir. 1970); Robinson v Klassen, Civ. No LR-C-73-301 (E.D. Ark. 1981); McFadden v Arkansas State Hospital, Civ. No. LR-C-78-153 (E.D. 1989; 1994); Taylor v Jones, 653 F 2d. 1193 (8th Cir. 1981); Hollowell v Gravett, Civ. No. LR-C-86-600 (E.D. Ark. 1989); and Perryman v Johnson Products, 698 F 2d. 1138 (11th Cir. 1983); Hollowell and Day v. Randy Johnson, E.D. Ark., October 30, 1995 .. Education Clark v Board of Education, 705 F 2d. 265 (8th Cir. 1983); Dowell v Oklahoma City Board of Education, 890 F 2d 1483 (10th Cir. 1989); Arvizu v Board of Education of Waco, Texas, 296 F 2d. 1309 (5th Cir. 1974); Kemp v Beasley, 389 F 2d. 178 (8th Cir. 1972); Raney v Board of Education of Gould, Arkansas, 381 F.2d 252 (8th Cir. 1967); Kelley v Altheimer, 378 F 2d. 483 (8th Cir. 1967); Little Rock School District v Pulaski County Special School District , 839 F 2d. 1296 (8th Cir. 1987), cert den., 102 L. Ed. 2d. 146 (1988); Smith v Board of Education of Morrilton, 365 F 2d. 770 (8th Cir. 1966); and Sherpell v. Humnoke School Dist. No. 5.; Rusk v. The Stuttgart School District,_ F.Supp. _, E.D. Ark. (1994). Housing 3 I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Williams v Matthews, 499 F. 2d. 819 (1974). Criminal Justice Winters v Beck, 407 F 2d. 125 (8th Cir. 1969). Public Accommodations Daniel v Paul, 395 U.S. 298 (1969). Voting Rights Sherpell v Humnoke, __ F.2d. __ (8th Cir. 1989); Harvell v Ladd, 978 F. 2d. 226 (8th Cir. 1992); Harvell v Ladd, __ F. 3d. __ (8th Cir. 1994); Williams v City of Texarkana. __ F. 3d. ___ (8th Cir. 1994). 6. I have served as Chairman of the Board of the Arkansas Opportunities industrialization Center (OIC), the Center for Law and Education (Cambridge, Mass.). and the Leadership Roundtable (Little Rock, Arkansas). In 1968, I was a member of the Arkansas Constitutional Revision Study Commission. In the early 1970's, I was a member of the Land Use Study Commission of the Southern Governors Conference. I have served as a member of the Supreme Court Committee on Legal Education. I have spoken or lectured at several annual meetings of the National Bar Association; the American Bar Association; other bar associations; many public colleges and many high schools regarding many subjects but primarily upon the subject of Civil Rights Law. I have also received numerous awards for my representation of civil rights causes and cases. B. Prior Work in School Desegregation Litigation in Pulaski County 7. I have a very large amount of experience concerning issues of racial discrimination and segregation in the Little Rock, North Little Rock, and Pulaski County 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I school systems. My activities began in 1965 with the preparatory work and the filing of Clark v. Board of Education of Little Rock, in which I was lead counsel. This case was a successor to Cooper v Aaron which had become inactive. Desegregation litigation concerning the North Little Rock Schools, in which I was also lead counsel, was initiated in 1967 in the Graves case. The Clark case was very active through 1982, when the case of Little Rock School District v Pulaski County Special School District was filed. There were many appeals in Clark. I also became involved in desegregation litigation in the Pulaski County Special School District in approximately 1969 in the Zinamon case which was settled. The North Little Rock case also involved considerable time through the early 1980's. The level of activity in Zinaman did not approach that of the other two cases. I filed for black citizens a motion to intervene in LRSD v PCSSD, which was pressed, and denie~ j'fler the district court ruled on behalf of the LRSD regarding liability. On appeal, the Court of Appeals recognized the right of the Joshua intervenors to represent the black parent and students in the three districts. This led to the renewal of my active role in school desegregation litigation in Pulaski County, which has continued to the present. C. 8. Involvement in This Case I was an active participant throughout the negotiations in 1988 and 1989, which produced the five agreements and the settlement of this case. 9. I have done some work on this case, in its post-judgment phase, on the majority of days since June, 1990. My work has included, inter alia, the following activities: 5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I ,, I I I I , (a) negotiating a series of modifications to the agreements which resolved this case, with the revised agreements denominated by the parties the \"May 1991 Plan\"; (b) negotiating a series of stipulations to resolve issues arising in the postjudgment phase of this case; (c) preparing for, attending, and participating (by argument, as well as crossexamination and presentation of witnesses), in approximately 55 hearings scheduled by the court (not including the hearings concerning the return of Arkansas officials as defendants and the election case); ( d) raising in the hearings many significant issues not raised by other parties; (e) calling problems/issues to the attention of the attorneys for the defendants and school officials, in each of the three districts, on many occasions; (f) meeting with counsel and school officials, with ODM representatives present at times, to gather information, to present concerns, and to seek to resolve issues regarding compliance with and modification of the court-approved agreements; (g) responding to proposals for plan modification in accordance with the courtapproved procedure (see Pulaski County Plan, at 104-05); (h) attending community meetings to brief the plaintiff class on the agreements, to answer questions and to discuss particular issues, and, generally, to secure the views of the class members on the direction of the case; (i) informing ODM of the concerns of the Joshua lntervenors and responding 6 I I I I ,, I I I .I I I I I I I I I I I to questions posed by ODM personnel; 0) overseeing the work of Ms. Joy Springer, members of my firm, and other persons who have represented the Joshua lntervenors in the post-judgment phase of this case; (k) overseeing the work of Ms. Springer and the other members of the Joshua monitoring team who prepared and disseminated to the parties, ODM, the Court and the public for a period of three school years, three lengthy reports setting forth findings and recommendations regarding the three school districts; (I) assisting individual class members - by responding to inquiries and more formal representation - who were experiencing problems regarding discipline, placement, and other matters; also assisting school district staff members who were experiencing problems; (m) studying the large volume of correspondence, pleadings, reports, court orders, and other documents generated in the post-judgment phase of this case, as well as internal memoranda prepared by Ms. Springer for my use; (n) determining the need for particular correspondence and pleadings and their content; ( o) drafting correspondence and pleadings; (p) speaking in public forums to support the desegregation plan; and (q) resisting efforts to undermine the plan and to diminish the constitutional rights involved. 7 I 1 I I I I l1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 10. The documentation of my work and that of Ms. Springer for the post-settlement period shows a very considerable emphasis on assisting individual class members and school staff. This emphasis is a result of my many years of experience in this type of litigation, as well as the experiences of others, discussed in articles and when counsel litigating these kinds of cases convene. It has been recognized that what have been termed \"second generation school desegregation problems\" have often worked to defeat the improved educational opportunities for black youth, which are the goal of school desegregation. We have, therefore, worked to apply provisions of the plans to particular instances of discipline, program placement, grading practices, participation in extracurricular activities, hostile faculty and staff attitudes, and adverse treatment of staff. It is our goal that each time we work in a particular school, we not only help the class member ( or staff member) involved, but also help to educate the school staff to be more sensitive to those we represent in the future. 11. It is apparent from our time records that much of the work which we have had to do in the post-settlement period has been attributable to the inadequate implementation of the Court-approved settlements, particularly by the Little Rock School District. The Court has often recognized these compliance problems. See, for example, the Court's 8- page written statement of March 19, 1993, identifying many problems and areas of noncompliance; see also; Tr., March 29, 1993, at 17 (\"[The LRSD Board] must be driven by this plan. The plan has to drive their actions and that has not been happening clearly.\"); at 19-20 (\"But [the LRSD defendants] drag their feet, and they don't have a plan in place to focus and they don't have a process in place to focus on what needs to be done to fulfill their obligations and I have waited long enough and I'm tired of waiting.\"); 8 I 1- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Tr., June 7, 1994 ('Well, saying that you can do this and saying that you will do it is not going to be enough in this courtroom any more. You're going to have to say specifically in some detail what you will do, when you'll do it, whom you'll contact and what have you.\"); Tr., June 29, 1994, at 54-62 (court notes inadequacies in LRSD, in budgeting practices, program evaluation, communication with the Joshua lntervenors, and community involvement). 12. We saw the settlement agreements in their totality as designed to promote desegregation, much stronger educational outcomes for black pupils, and real efforts to eliminate harsh practices affecting black youth. We perceived these agreements to require actions bespeaking the equality of all citizens. We anticipated good faith, competent implementation of the agreements. However, we have often been disappointed. We have, therefore, used every available advocacy technique, in an effort to hold the defendants to the agreements which they made, to improve their performances. We provided three detailed monitoring reports to the systems. Our goals included strengthening cooperation and helping the defendants to identify the barrirs to full equality for black students. We offered models to produce effective results in the Incentive Schools. We have taken the lead, in dealing with the State, to protect (and increase) the financial resources available to the districts. We have been conscientious in terms of preparation for and participation in the budget (and other) hearings. We have sought to promote improved budgeting practices and to prevent the waste of resouces. We have opposed harmful budget cuts. We have emphasized that considerations of equity and equality in the provisions of resources require that some new facilities be opened in the black community ( opposing the pattern of merely closing schools in our class members' neighborhoods). The intervening class does not accept \"one way'' remedies - and we 9 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1, I I I I t I have made that point. We have addressed issues concerning staff hiring and placement, transportation, participation in extracurricular activities, and many others. Ms. Springer and I have been available to assist class members day after day, as evidenced to our affidavits. This description and others in my affidavit are, of course, only a brief description of our efforts and accomplishments. D. My Hours In the Post-Settlement Phase of This Case 13. The attachment to this Affidavit contains 97 pages, documenting my work in the post-judgment phase of this case. While the identification of my work is the product of a reconstruction of my efforts, I am confident that it is accurate. This is so because a variety of sources, containing overlapping information, including my memory, as well as records and court documentation were used to identify particular tasks. The identification of 1,798 hours, approximately 6.4 hours per week, is very conservative. I am certain that my actual time on this case greatly exceeded the number of hours claimed. 14. One basis for my confidence that the time claimed for me is conservative is a comparison of this time with the time for which counsel for the LRSD, the NLRSD, and the PCSSD have been paid in the post-settlement period . Analyses performed in my office, utilizing documents secured by invoking the State Freedom of Information Act, show the hours worked by opposing counsel to be as follows: LRSD NLRSD PCSSD 1995 (1-8/95) 1995 (1/4/95) 1995 (March) 1029.5 hrs. \"230.75 hrs. \"29.8 hrs. 128.7 per mo. *57.7 per mo. 10 I I' I I 'I I II I 1 I I I I I ' I I I f I 1994 1994 1994 (6-19/94) *1774.3 hrs. *668.75 hrs. *148.4 hrs. *147.9 per mo. *55.7 per mo. Note: Other bl/,. show ,,.yment for WOiie throughout the period since December 1990, but not the hours claimed. 1993 (8 mo.) 1993 *1465.5 hrs. *55.0 per mo. *122.1 per mo. (1-2, 7-12/90) 1992 1992 (11 mo.) *1256.5 hrs. 555.75 hrs. *104.7 per mo. 50.5 per mo. 1991 1991 (10 mo.) *1529 hrs. 814.25 hrs. *127.4 per mo. 81.4 per mo. 1990 (4-12/90) 1990 (5 mo.) *206.75 hrs. 372.5 hrs. 74.5 per mo. TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL 7261.55 hrs. 3301.8 hours Incomplete While this time does include some time which we have excluded in the current motion - for example, the time involved in seeking to require state officials to comply with the settlement agreement - it is to be noted that my work is directed to all of the school 11 I I J I -1 I, I ' I I I' I I I , , , I I I districts to a greater extent than counsel representing each district, E. The Reasonable Hourly Rate and Related Matters 15. The following factors establish, I believe, that the rate sought for my work in the post-settlement phase of this case, $250.00 per hour, is a reasonable rate: (a) I was described by Circuit Judge Richard Arnold in Taylor v. Jones as a member of the bar of the ''first rank.\" In 1995, in an order awarding attorneys' fees, Judge George Howard, Jr. of this Court wrote: ''The Court notes that Walker is one of the most preeminent civil rights attorneys in the State.\" See McFadden v. Arkansas State Hospital, C.A. No. LR-C-78-153, at 3. (b) I have very extensive experience in school desegregation litigation, both generally and in Pulaski County, as detailed in paragraphs 1 through 7 of this Affidavit. (c) I regularly charge fee paying clients $250.00 per hour when they are able to pay that rate. In most of the cases in which I have represented prevailing parties, I have settled my fee requests with the losing party at my regular rate in order to avoid the additional cost of litigating and preparing fee petitions. (d) On September 7, 1994, John Haley of the firm of Arnold, Grobmyer \u0026 Haley signed an Affidavit for use in the case of Leapheart v. City of Morrilton and Carl Gipson, C.A LR-C-91~96. Mr. Haley stated that his rate for \"a practice consisting mostly of commercial, corporate and bankruptcy law'' was then $225.00 per hour. He supported that rate for my work in Leapheart, which was for the period from October 12, 1992 through September 13, 1994 as \"consistent with fees charged 12 I 1' J I I I I I 1 I I I 'I I' I :I I by (him) and other attorneys in Central Arkansas with similar lengths of practice, standing, expertise, and ability'' (at 1-2). (e) I was awarded $175.00 per hour for work in the McFadden case, concerning employment discrimination, by Judge Howard in 1989. In the 1995 Order in McFadden to which I have referred, Judge Howard increased the rate for my work to $225.00 per hour (at 3). This year, in Ashford v. City of Hamburg. El Dorado No. 93-1032, I was awarded $225.00 per hour by the Honorable Harry Barnes. In that case, involving police brutality, Attorney John Hall reviewed my affidavit and time record for the defendant and agreed that $225.00 per hour was a reasonable hourly rate for my services. (f) The publication Arkansas Business sets forth in its November 13, 1995 issue, the results of a survey of 12 Little Rock law firms regarding their \"hourly fee range[s].\" Of 10 firms willing to furnish information, one identified a top rate of $250.00 hour, i.e., Jack, Lyon and Jones, and two identified top rates of $225.00 per hour. See Attachment Two to this Affidavit. (g) The counsel for the school districts have been paid regularly throughout the post-settlement period. In contrast, any comprehensive award to our firm will be delayed. (h) The volume of the work in this case and the unpredictable demands on my time have limited my ability to represent fee paying clients. (i) We seek the vast majority of the amount sought from the LRSD. Granting the requested rate would, hopefully, provide an inducement for those defendants 13 I I I I I I I I I I I I i 1 I I I l , , I, ' t i I I t I t I I to improve the poor quality of the district's compliance with the Court-approved settlements, about which the Court has frequently commented. 16. It is the practice in this market to bill a fee-paying client separately for the time worked by a paralegal. Our firm currently bills fee-paying clients $50.00 per hour for the work of Joy Charles Springer, given the level of her experience and the quality of her work. It is also worth noting that the assignment of considerable work to Ms. Charles, in this case, greatly reduces the defendants' liability for fees. 17. I have expended more than $150,000.00 in out-of-pocket monitoring costs over the course of this Settlement Decree. This includes time for Ms. Springer and the others who assisted with the undertaking. Her time is not separatelyclaimed except byher affidavit and time statement. Monitors Clementine Rouse (now deceased), Evelyn Jackson, Delores Sykes and Kirke Heman, are former school teachers in schools within this county. Debbie Parker is a former paralegal for Woodson Walker \u0026 Associates in Little Rock. She is a graduate of UALR. LaRhonda Pondexter is a graduate of Hendrix College. Pondexter and Parker worked frull-time in monitoring and in writing the report filed by Joshua herein. To my knowledge, both live outside the city; hence we only claim the actual payments made to them for reimbursement. The claim for monitors, except for Springer does not include their 1995 receipts (i.e., payments which I made to them for monitoring work). I expressly reserve the right to make a later claim for this time and/or expense. I seek reimbursement for the time and expense as verified by Ramsey Eddington, C.P.A. in the amount of $96,812.81. 18. Our motion seeks an apportionment of the award of fees and costs among 14 I I I I J I I t 'I j '' I I t 'l f t I the school districts as follows: Little Rock School District (75 to 85), Pulaski County Special School District (15 to 20 percent), and North Little Rock School District (5 to 10 percent) (total to be 100 percent). This reflects my assessment of the time spent litigating against the three systems, including reviewing information and filings, and their relative culpability. E. The Negotiation of and the Content of the Settlement Agreement 19. In the years 1988 and 1989, I represented the Joshua lntervenors in a series of negotiation sessions with counsel for the other parties which ended with the five agreements ultimately approved by the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and this court. These agreements set forth desegregation plans for the LR, NLR, and PCSSD systems, an interdistrict plan, and the financial commitments of the state. Other participants in these discussions were counsel for the parties: Herschel Friday, Chris Heller and, Jerry Malone, for the LR school district; Alston Jennings and Sam Jones for the PCSSD,\" and Steve Jones and Phil Lyon, for the NLRSD; Walter Smiley, a local businessman, and Skip Rutherford, also a local businessman who was then a member of the Board of LRSD. 20. In the course of the discussions we addressed relief of benefit to the Joshua lntervenors and other students, which had definite financial implications for the districts and the state. The participants recognized explicitly, that in order to arrive at a meaningful desegregation plan, it had to clearly be undertaken in an arms length matter. We therefore separated those discussions from any discussion of an amount to compensate LDF and Joshua counsel for their time and expenses in litigating school desegregation issues 15 I ~ \\ J I I I' ''I I l ' ,, I I , , I I I through the years until the conclusion of the settlement itself. 21. Paragraph IV.B. of the settlement was agreed upon before we reached a substantive discussion of the topic of fees and costs. It does not refer to those subjects. There was no discussion of fees and costs in the context of this provision. This paragraph deals in its entirety with \"issues which have been raised, or could have been raised, in this Litigation . . . \" as of the time of the settlement discussions. This did not include a fee request for the monitoring phase of the case, the parameters of which could not be known at the time of the settlement discussions. 22. Paragraph V of the agreement on the state's liability reflects the parties' settlement of the issue of attorneys' fees and costs for LDF and Joshua counsel. It is limited to compensation for the work through the preparation of the settlement. It does not by its terms address fees for the monitoring period. Moreover, in the context of discussions regarding this paragraph, no one took the position either that the fee settlement included compensation for the monitoring period, or that Joshua and/or LDF counsel were precluded from securing fees for any part of the monitoring period. I have read the foregoing statements and they are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and information. 16 ., -I I ) ,, , I' t fl I I J' \\ i I I ,'t , , I SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 2 / day of November, 1995. MY COMMI. SION EXPIRES: ''/ /1 \"a'.' ~ NOTARY PUBLIC 17 I ,, I ! , , , , I I I t I l , , \\ I I. t r -I I I John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 In reference to: Little Rock School District, et al. v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al.; Lorene Joshua, et. al.; Katherine Knight, et al. (lntervenors); NO. LR-C-82-866 DATE 02/18/90 02/26/90 03/12/90 03/12/90 03/21/90 06/28/90 ACTIVITY STATEMENT OF JOHN W. WALKER 1990 ACTIVITY HOURS Talked to Mayor Smith about Reville's letter .3 Attended two school suspension hearings .5 Tim Montgomery preparation, consultation, re: hearing for 03/13/90 1.0 Met with Arma Hart, re: Incentive Schools and dictated letter to her 3.5 Spoke with Pat Scarborough about Central High problem regarding Magnet School; spoke with Herts about one race result in student elections . 75 Talked to C. Heller re: loan approval motion; signed motion; reviewed settlement agreement prior to signing; talked to Wiley Branton about agreement .8 SUBTOTAL 6.85 Activity Statement John W. Walker 1 I I I I , , I I I t., l 1 \\ I I I r \\I I I DATE 01/03/91 01/04/91 01/05/91 01/06/91 01/08/91 01/09/91 01/10/91 01/11/91 01/13/91 01/14/91 01/15/91 01/16/91 01/17/91 01/18/91 ACTIVITY HOURS 1991 Began implementation discussions with counsel Discussions with counsel continued 2.5 3.1 Meeting with office staff re: ways to assist in implementing plan and helping districts identifying problem areas 3.0 Continued meetings re: office monitoring and implementation assistance 1.0 Plan for and meetings with district counsel re: desegregation implementation 6.2 Plan for and meetings with district counsel re: desegregation implementation 7 .1 Plan for and meetings with district counsel re: desegregation implementation 8.0 Plan for and meeting with sam Jones re: desegregation implementation 4.0 Received mandate from 8th Circuit .1 Discussions with counsel about plan changes; conference with Springer re: Joshua monitoring instrument 6.1 Conference with Heller regarding plan modifications, Incentive School - Aerospace School 5.3 Conference with Steele and Heller re: plan implementation; review of plan 4.4 Reviewed extended day provisions of plan; talked with Steele, Jennings, Heller 2.4 Read Order denying motions for reconsideration .1 Activity Statement - John W. Walker 2 I t I I' f, I I t t, 1 t \\l I I I I t I, DATE 011/22/91 01/23/91 01/24/91 01/24/91 01/24/91 01/25/91 01/25/91 01/25/91 01/26/91 01/26/91 01/28/91 01/28/91 01/29/91 ACTIVITY HOURS Read part of Tri-District Plan; read part of LRSD Aerospace Magnet Plan; conference with Heller 3.5 Read 20 pages of Aerospace Magnet Proposal; conference with Heller and Steele 2.5 Prepare for Little Rock Hearing before Judge Wright on Aerospace Magnet School; conference with Heller and Paulson 3.2 Consideration of Magnet School Proposal; received fax from C. Heller regarding proposed stipulation; conferences with C. Heller; no agreement reached 1.2 Read letter to court from Burl lntervenors Prepared for Hearing before Judge Wright Preparation for and hearing before Judge Wright on Aerospace .2 1.1 Magnet School 3.0 Conference with Chris Heller about plan for the next day .3 Began review of QOM curriculum audit 1.2 Waited at Holiday Inn for Chris Heller who didn't show; read 40 pages of magnet application . 7 Met with Dr. Steele and Chris Heller about 2.0 gpa rule and Aerospace Magnet; telephone conferences with Heller and Jennings re: scholarship incentive 4.0 Called Dr. L.A. Davis to discuss his employment as expert, re: critique of Aerospace Magnet and to work with Angela Sewell to try to strengthen plan; Davis agreed to work for $45.00 per hour or $300.00 per seven hour day. He is to start at once; sent proposal to Pine Bluff by Vincent Maxwell; district is to reimburse costs; conferences with counsel 2.8 Obtained Little Rock Aerospace Project support - Mahlon Martin of Rockefeller Foundation; Dick Hulbert, Central Flying Service writings in support; conference with Heller; met with Activity Statement - John W. Walker 3 l ., , l ' , , I I \\ :I, t I' II I I I f I I I DATE 01/30/91 01/30/91 01/30/91 01/31/91 02/01/91 02/02/91 02/03/91 02/04/91 02/04/91 02/04/91 02/07/91 ACTIVI1Y HOURS ministers re: plan Spoke with Chris Heller by phone, re: Aerospace Magnet; telephone conference with L.A. Davis, re: Aerospace Magnet and met with Committee and Dr. A. Sewell who agreed to work for $45.00 per hour or $300.00 per seven hour day. He is to 4.0 start at once; Sent proposal by Vincent Maxwell 4.5 Met with Dr. Davis, re: Little Rock proposals for Aerospace Magnet; began revising and drafting formal document 6.5 Order granting motion of Knight lntervenors for order to substitute class representatives .1 Continued to work on Aerospace Magnet issue; conferred with C. Heller, Dr. Steele, and parents, as well as expert Lawrence Davis; additional drafting and editing of proposal 11.5 Drafting, editing and redrafting plan for Aerospace Magnet for finalization for filing with Judge; conference with Heller, Springer, et al. 6.0 Four telephone conferences with C. Heller; telephone conference with Dick Hulbert, re: revising Aerospace Magnet School settlement; revising same with Mark B. 2.5 Preparation 2.1 Returned Chris Heller's call regarding settlement approval; conference with Hulbert, preparation 3.1 Worked with Chris Heller, Richard Roachell and J.S. on Aerospace proposal 2.0 Read Stipulation \u0026 Consent Order finding that the LRSD's desegregation plan is modified to include the Aerospace Technology Magnet School; spoke with C. Heller, and district officials .5 Conferences with counsel re: stipulation and extended day problems 1.5 Activity Statement - John W. Walker 4 I - I , . I 'I I I I I , , t \\I '' I I, t l DATE 02/09/91 02/11/91 02/12/91 02/13/91 02/13/91 02/19/91 02/21/91 02/22/91 02/25/91 02/26/91 02/26/91 02/26/91 02/26/91 02/28/91 ACTIVITY HOURS Reviewed PCSSD's First Quarter Status Report for 1990-91 \u0026 Special Report concerning the J.C. Cook Elementary School .6 Reviewed Order granting motion of Burl lntervenors .1 Reaching agreement and entering Stipulation, filed by Joshua lntervenors, LRSD, PCSSD, NLRSD \u0026 Knight lntervenors, for approval of substituting Bonnie Brown in place of Sara Matthews Facen as class representative .4 Reviewed Order granting stipulation of parties re: class representatives .1 Read Stipulation \u0026 Consent Order concerning Washington and four other topics .6 Reviewed Affidavit of Richard N. Hulbert re: Aerospace Magnet School .2 Read letter to Stephen Jones re: concerns on memo with appearances of plagiarism and racism; attended school board meeting 2.2 Read State's letter to court re: funding payments from Dept. of Educ. to the Office of Desegregation Monitoring .2 Conference with Joshua monitoring team members to discuss monitoring LRSD schools 1.5 Review of letter from Sharon Street to Judge Wright .3 Received and reviewed letter to Chris Heller from Sam Jones; letter to Sam Jones .2 Review of letter from Sharon Street to Judge Wright .3 Received \u0026 reviewed letter to Chris Heller from Sam Jones; letter to Sam Jones .4 Read Order finding that the State is obligated under the terms of the settlement agreement to continue funding the ODM .1 Activity Statement - John W. Walker 5 1- 1 I I I ' II I I t i t I f '' f' I t 1 DATE 03/01/91 03/05/91 03/06/91 03/15/91 03/15/91 03/17/91 03/18/91 03/18/91 03/19/91 03/20/91 03/21/91 03/21/91 03/25/91 03/26/91 ACTIVITY HOURS Conference with Jennings, Matthis re: Incentive Schools 1.1 Meeting about plan m "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1640","title":"Court Filings: District Court, affidavit of Joy C. Springer","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Springer, Joy C."],"dc_date":["1995-11-21"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Education--Economic aspects","Educational law and legislation","Lawyers","Court records"],"dcterms_title":["Court Filings: District Court, affidavit of Joy C. Springer"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1640"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["116 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":["Springer, Joy C."],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. v. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS AFFIDAVIT OF JOY C. SPRINGER STATE OF ARKANSAS) SS) COUNTY OF PULASKI) Comes now the affiant, Joy c. Springer, who submits the following affidavit under oath: A, EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT HISTORY 1. I received a BSBA degree in three years from Henderson State University in Arkadelphia, Arkansas in 1977. I was also selected as a member of Who's Who Among American College and University Students in 1977. I was a member of the student Senate and served on one of the first Human Relations Committees at the University. I am currently enrolled at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock pursuing a master's degree in Elementary Education having completed approximately 40 hours. My post graduate work in education was necessitated by my current job 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I responsibilities and the need to become more familiar w~th educational terminology and concepts. In May, 1995, I was selected as a charter member of Alpha Sigma Lambda Honor Society with a GPA of 3.9. 2. In 1978, I was employed by Allstate Insurance Company as a telephone claims representative in the Little Rock, Arkansas claims office. This office concentrated on handling personal lines insurance claims. Having completed one year of employment, I was recognized as Employee of the Year. over the next several years, I received a number of promotions. Around 1985, I was promoted to Casualty Claim Manager for the State of Arkansas. I was responsible for the training and supervision of claim representatives for the entire state. This training included proper investigation of auto, homeowner and bodily injury claims. I was also a budget manager. I was responsible for reviewing and analyzing claim data (past and present) for use in the preparation of budgets from year to year. The office had a list of goals and commitments for which I was responsible for tracking and reporting to the Regional office. In addition to these duties, I was responsible for the assigning of complaints, which were in the form of lawsuits, to defense attorneys over the entire state for the purpose of providing proper defense to policy holders and the company. I worked closely with our defense attorneys by making periodic contacts with them to monitor the progress of the pending litigation. I was also responsible for maintaining a trial log. I provided monthly 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I reports to our Regional office. Having worked in a claims office for over ten years, I have extensive training and experience in procedure implementation and compliance, data analysis, time management, file organization, research, and investigations. 3. Most of my actual paralegal training has been on the job for the last five years. However, during my previous employment, many of my paralegal skills were developed. Because of my previous job experience, I was already very familiar with many of the tasks that I currently perform as a paralegal. B, OVERVIEW OF WORK IN THIS CASE 4. Around January, 1990, I went to work full time for John w. Walker, P.A. One of my assignments from Mr. Walker was the Pulaski County school desegregation case. I have attended all of the Court hearings in the Pulaski county school case for the last four years. My work on the school case has included the following tasks: a. reading and review of the Office of Desegregation Monitoring and the three districts' monitoring and status reports, and preparing position papers and memoranda for lead counsel for review and discussion; b. review of all pleadings and orders in this case, and preparing position papers and memoranda for lead counsel for review and discussion; c. overseeing the monitoring activities of the Joshua monitoring team during the 1990-1991, 1991-92, 1992-93 and 1993- 94 school years (see also paragraphs 4 - 11 below); 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I d. conducting monthly and bimonthly meetings with Joshua monitoring team members to discuss findings during scheduled and unscheduled monitoring visits; e. ensuring that monitoring teams visited every school in the three school districts during the 1991-92 and 1992-93 school years; f. review and discussion of monitoring reports prepared by Joshua team members with lead counsel and team members; g. dissemination of Joshua's monitoring reports to the parties, Office of Desegregation Monitoring and the Court; h. initiating and scheduling of meetings and conferences with the Office of Desegregation Monitoring to secure their monitoring schedules and areas of monitoring priorities for the school year; i. pre-hearing preparations which included interviewing of witnesses, preparation of exhibits, organization of exhibits, file organization and consulting with lead counsel on the issues to be presented at Court; j. abstracting of witness testimony during Court hearings; k. assisting lead counsel with exhibits during court hearings; 1. assisting lead counsel with witness testimony during court hearings; m. representing class members in the Little Rock, 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Pulaski County and North Little Rock school districts to ensure implementation of plan provisions for nondiscriminatory practices with respect to discipline and educational placement (see paragraphs 12-18 below); n. contacts with district officials in the three districts to request information with respect to plan provisions and implementation; o. handling telephone calls from class members in the three districts with respect to educational placement, student rights, discipline and plan provisions; p. draft of motions and draft responses to pleadings; q. attending school board meetings and meetings between the parties with respect to plan implementation and proposed modifications; and r. management and organization of the case file, a significant task due to its volume and the need to draw upon its content. C. JOSHUA INTERVENORS' MONITORING REPORTS 4. Since the settlement agreement, the Joshua Intervenors have completed three comprehensive monitoring reports for the years 1990-91, 1991-92 and 1992-93. I spent a considerable amount of time working on these reports and am familiar with the manner in which information was gathered, the content of the reports, and the roles played by the persons involved in preparing each report, whom it was my responsibility to supervise. 5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5. The first year of its monitoring, the team visited approximately thirty (30) schools in the Little Rock, Pulaski County and North Little Rock school districts. This report reflected findings at the Incentive schools, in the Little Rock School District, in the following areas: curriculum; student educational plans; discipline; recruitment; parental involvement; biracial committees; classroom findings; interim reports; budget management; staffing; and general concerns. The remaining schools which included elementary and secondary schools were monitored in the areas of: curriculum; discipline; staffing; and general concerns. of these schools. A team of at least three persons visited each One team member met with the principal to ask general questions about student enrollment by race and gender, staff makeup by race and gender, curriculum expectations, parental involvement, discipline expectations, etc. as contemplated by the respective desegregation plans. The remaining team members visited at least one classroom on every grade level, including resource rooms and specialty programs and made contact with the guidance counselor and other support staff in each of the respective schools. This Joshua report and the reports for the next two school years differed from reports later prepared by the Office of Desegregation Monitoring in that they were based upon visits to a more representative number of schools and contained more anecdotal information from students, parents and staff, including information secured during the school visits and in the course of day-to-day work in monitoring the 6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I agreements. Much of the statistical data reflected in the report came from the school's profile. The final report for 1990-1991 consisted of 142 pages of Joshua's findings and recommendations. A copy was initially provided to the central administration of each school district. Later, based upon requests which we received, we provided full copies and/or excerpts to other persons including the representatives of the desegregation offices and individual schools who sought particular portions pertaining to their schools. 6. The other persons who participated in the preparation of the 1990-91 report were Kirke Herman, Evelyn Jackson, and Clementine Rouse, each of whom had a background of teaching in public schools in one of the three Districts; Opal Sims, who taught at the Little Rock Job Corp Center, substituted in the Little Rock School District for a year and monitored federal programs for ACTION, now referred to as Corporation for National Service; and named class representative Lorene Joshua. This report was written by Ms. Sims and me and reviewed by lead counsel, John w. Walker, who had also participated in defining the team's overall approach. 7. During the 1991-92 school year, Joshua's monitoring team members visited every school in the three districts. The team members decided to start with the Pulaski County School District during this school year since Little Rock was monitored first in 1990-91. Afterwhich, North Little Rock was monitored and finally Little Rock. once again, the areas addressed in the monitoring 7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I report were: curriculum; discipline; parental involvement; staffing; and general areas of concern. The areas addressed in the Incentive school report for 1990-91 were discussed again. The same general approach was followed whereby a team visited certain schools with at least one monitor holding a conference with the principal and the other team members making visits to the other classrooms as previously indicated. In this report, the team members felt it necessary to indicate to the schools their areas of strengths along with their areas of concerns. Statistical data was gathered from the school's profile and from the school's principal. The team once again felt that it was important to include anecdotal findings from students, parents and staff members, drawn both from the monitoring visits and other work. The final report for the 91-92 school year was completed and filed with the Court on or about June 5, 1992 by LaRhonda Pondexter and myself. The document contained 328 pages of Joshua's findings for over 119 schools that were visited. It was shared with all parties and others, in a manner similar to the previous year. The report indicated that there was a substantial amount of noncompliance by each of the districts regarding their commitments to address achievement disparities, discipline disparities, integrated parental involvement, student assignments, integrated staffing, overrepresentation in special education and underrepresentation in gifted programs and advanced placement classes. 8. In addition to the co-author, LaRhonda Pondexter, the 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I persons who participated in the second year monitoring efforts were Kirke Herman, Evelyn Jackson, Lorene Joshua, Clementine Rouse, and a second new team member, Delores Sykes, a retired teacher from Rockefeller Incentive School of the Little Rock School District. This report was also reviewed by lead counsel, John W. Walker. 9. The last comprehensive report by the Joshua Intervenors was completed and filed with the Court on or about June 27, 1993. It consisted of 396 pages of the team's findings and recommendations to the three school districts, following visits to every school in the three systems. This report followed the same format as the two previous reports. The report reeked with continued noncompliance regarding desegregation commitments. Joshua Intervenors followed the same approach as the previous years in disseminating the report. 10. The third report was written by Deborah Parker and myself. Other team members were Kirke Herman, Clementine Rouse, Delores Sykes, and Lorene Joshua. Lead counsel, John w. Walker again reviewed this report. 11. Following each report, we received responses and feedback to what we had written. Persons who called and provided written responses were the assistant superintendents for desegregation in the Little Rock and Pulaski County districts (multiple occasions); principals from all of the districts (multiple occasions); members from the Incentive School Parent Council and Biracial committees; patrons of the Districts; as 9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I well as representatives of newspapers and television stations who publicized on several occasions our findings of noncompliance and recommendations. A number of the school representatives thanked us for undertaking this work and stated that they would address the concerns in areas such as deficiencies in the Incentive school program, discipline, staff racial composition, student assignments, enrollment in gifted programs, participation in extracurricular activities, etc., which the reports by Joshua Intervenors identified. D. ASSISTANCE TO CLASS MEMBERS FACING DISCIPLINE 12. Each plan requires that discipline be carried out in a manner that is free of racial discrimination. See LRSD Plan, pages 33-34, PCSSD Plan, pages 73-76, and NLRSD Plan pages 41-42. Nevertheless, data reported for each system, during the period after approval the settlement, has repeatedly established that black students, particularly black males, are disciplined more frequently and severely than white students. During the 1990-91 school year, lead counsel, John W. Walker assigned me the task of representing class members threatened with discipline by one of the three systems, and their parents, in order to secure for them the benefits of the relevant plan's protection against racial discrimination in discipline. As shown by the attached summary of my work, this has been one of my significant activities since that time. 13. In the course of this work on discipline, I have represented at hearings a total of approximately 120 class 10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I members. I have also assisted a significant number of class members experiencing discipline problems by a telephone call to the student's teacher, principal, or central office administrator. These discipline problems have also been resolved through appeal at the hearing officer level for the Little Rock School District, the Discipline committee level for the Pulaski County Special School District and the Assistant Superintendent for Student Affairs level for the North Little Rock School District. I have assisted class members in all three school districts with approximately 75-80% concerning Little Rock schools. I have attended hearings at among other the following schools: Little Rock Elementary schools - Mabelvale, Washington, Franklin, Mitchell, Rockefeller, Ish, Rockefeller, Martin Luther King, Fulbright, Jefferson, Woodrow, Fair Park, Badgett, Baseline, Geyer Springs; Little Rock Junior High schools - Horace Mann, Dunbar, Southwest, Cloverdale, Henderson, Mabelvale, Pulaski Heights and Forest Heights, Cloverdale, and Mabelvale; Little Rock High Schools - central, Fair, Parkview, Hall, J.A. Fair and McClellan; North Little Rock schools - North Little Rock East and West campuses, Ridgeroad and Lakewood Junior Highs, Boone Park, Bellwood, and Rose City elementary schools; Pulaski County Elementary schools - Fuller, Bates, Sylvan Hills, Sherwood, Jacksonville, Homer Atkins, Baker, Lawson, Landmark, and Crystal Hill elementary schools; Pulaski county Junior High schools - Jacksonville North and south Junior High, Fuller, Sylvan Hills, Northwood, and Oak Grove; Pulaski County High 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I schools - Jacksonville, North Pulaski, Sylvan Hills, Mills and Oak Grove. Approximately 75% of the cases in which I represented students, class members were not excluded from school as had initially been proposed. Joshua Intervenors also used in another way the information learned in representing these class members. When there appeared to be a problem of racial discrimination in a particular school, we notified the Superintendent or Assistant Superintendent of the particular district. In some schools, as a result of my work, I have detected that class members are treated more fairly in the discipline process, although, there remains a need for improvement. 14. It is clear to me that racial discrimination affects the discipline process in these three school systems in a variety of ways. For example, there are instances of teachers and administrators being insensitive to the fact that a student acted out as a result of racial harassment, advocating exclusion from school and not proposing to utilize in-school suspension or other non-exclusionary placement, proposing harsh discipline for trivial conduct, etc . E. OTHER ASSISTANCE TO CLASS MEMBERS FACING DISPARATE TREATMENT 15. Each of the districts also requires that class members receive educational opportunities that they have previously been denied but for racial discrimination such as participation in extracurricular activities, participation in gifted and talented and advanced placement programs, etc. See LRSD Plan pages 39-40; 12 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I NLRSD Plan pages 39-40; and PCSSD Plan pages 69-70. These plans also require that class member placement in special education programs be free of racial discrimination. See LRSD Plan pages 111-123; NLRSD Plan pages 16-23; and PCSSD Plan pages 44-52. 16. However, data reported from each of the three districts since the settlement agreement continue to show that black students are placed in special education programs more frequently and at a higher rate than white students. Black student participation in extracurricular activities such as Honor Society, Beta Club, Student Government Association, etc. remained predominately white. In addition, white students continue to be placed in advanced placement and gifted and talented programs at a higher rate than black students. As a result of these statistics, personal and telephone conferences with class member parents, lead counsel, John w. Walker also assigned me the task of participating in conferences with parents of students with concerns about educational placement. 17. I have participated in over 50 conferences over the last five years regarding educational placement. I have assisted class members in all three districts with approximately 75-80% concerning Little Rock schools. I have attended conferences in Little Rock Elementary schools - Mabelvale, Washington, Franklin, Mitchell, Rockefeller, Ish, Rockefeller, Martin Luther King, Fulbright, Jefferson, Woodrow, Fair Park, Badgett, Baseline, Geyer springs; Little Rock Junior High schools - Horace Mann, Dunbar, Southwest, Cloverdale, Henderson, 13 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~I Mabelvale, Pulaski Heights and Forest Heights, Cloverdale, and Mabelvale; Little Rock High schools - Central, Hall, J.A. Fair and Parkview; Pulaski Elementary schools - Fuller, Bates, Sylvan Hills, Sherwood, Jacksonville, Homer Atkins, Baker, Lawson, Landmark, and Crystal Hill elementary schools; Pulaski County Junior High schools - Jacksonville North and South, Fuller, Sylvan Hills and Oak Grove; Pulaski county High schools - Mills, Sylvan Hills, North Pulaski and Jacksonville; and North Little Rock schools - North Little Rock East and West campuses, Ridgeroad and Lakewood Junior High schools and Bellwood and Boone Park Elementary schools. I would say in 90-95% of the conferences held, the parent was satisfied with the outcome of the educational placement. Joshua representatives have employed the knowledge and information gained in these conferences to alert district administrators to perceived problems of racial discrimination. 18. In addition to the work previously outlined above, I had personal and telephone conferences with parents of class members to provide assistance and direction regarding student assignments, transportation, and general concerns about school operations. over the past five years, I have had over 500 conferences of this nature. I would estimate that approximately 85-90% of these had satisfactory results in that a resolution was reached satisfying the parent and class member. 19. Finally, I have also been instructed by lead counsel to conference with black staff members in all three Districts to 14 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I listen, assist and give direction regarding problems they perceive as violative of the Consent Decree herein. A number of these conferences have addressed disparate treatment of student and staff relating to the overall school operation. However, many have to do with perceived racial discrimination by the Districts with respect to their individual employment. I have had conferences with approximately 20 staff members in all three Districts. I have had conferences with staff from the following schools in Little Rock: Rockefeller, Wakefield, Garland, Mitchell, Gibbs, Franklin, Mabelvale, Parkview, Central, Hall, Pulaski Heights, Forest Heights, Southwest, Cloverdale and Mabelvale. I have given other assistance to staff member in the following schools in North Little Rock: West and East campuses, Alternative school and Ridgeroad Junior High school; and Oak Grove High, Sylvan Hills Elementary and Junior High, Fuller Junior High and Mills High schools in Pulaski County. l, HOURS CLAIMED, HOURLY RATE AND OTHER INFORMATION 20. Attachment 1 to this affidavit denotes 3169.1 hours which I have worked on this matter from June, 1990 to October 31, 1995 including time for preparation of this fee statement. I have worked closely with Mr. Robert Pressman and Mr. John Walker since September, 1995 regarding the compilation and preparation of this motion, memorandum, affidavits, fee petitions, expense statements and other related documents. With respect to the time expended by me regarding this massive undertaking, my actual time 15 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I ,, I I I records reflect that I have worked for more than 12 hours a day from November 8, 1995 to November 20, 1995 including Saturdays and Sundays. The time expended during this period of time is in excess of 150 hours. Because I had already reviewed and organized many of the documents used for the preparation of this motion, I only make claim for ~ hours. I believe this request is reasonable given the voluminous nature of this case file. No time is being claimed for orientation of Mr. Pressman. My time statement excludes time for the following matters related to this case: a. the Little Rock Rezoning case; b. fees already awarded by this court regarding the ADE matter in 1993; and c. fees related to the PCSSD reorganization in 1993. 21. I compiled from the check registers maintained by Mr. Henry Hall, office manager for John W. Walker, P.A. information showing the following total payments reimbursed to me for mileage costs and other monitoring expenses in the case of LRSD v PCSSD in the years 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, and 1995. The totals are: 1991 - $1669.29 1992 - $1523.97 1993 - $75.00 1994 - $1208.75 1995 - $265.00 Total - $4742.01 These payments are evidenced by the \"checks stubs\" maintained by Mr. Hall for the following checks. 1991 12022 12028 12253 12509 16 627.00 50.00 94.16 222.64 I I I 1 I I I I I ,, I I I I I I I I I 12573 173.64 12668 201.85 12994 300.00 $1669.29 1992 1797 66.19 1817 220.69 1879 1000.00 1935 53.28 2343 100.00 2369 150.00 $1523.97 1993 13599 75 . 00 $75.00 1994 1268 116.15 1439 92.60 15811 1000.00 $1208.75 1995 16457 65 . 00 16463 200.00 $265.00 The records also reveal a payment to Kirke Herman for expenses on February 8, 1995 in the amount of $100.00 (check number 14871). I have also compiled from the check register of Mr. Henry Hall other expenses related to this case such as witnesses fees and copying of the docket. These payments were as follows: ~ !:;hegt Number Pumose Amount 9/16/95 17121 copy of docket $ 60.00 6/23/95 16819 witness fee 40.00 3/3/94 14981 expert witness 215.00 2/15/94 14921 copy of transcript 39.00 'l'otal - $354.00 17 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 22. I am also in a position, based upon my work, to estimate the amount for facsimiles, postage, and copying costs which we have incurred for this case from the period of 1991 through October 1995, a period of 58 months. It is as follows: COPYING *average of 1500 copies per month multiplied by 58 months equals 87,000 copies; *cost at .15 cents per page equals $13,050.00; conservative estimate of cost for copying in absence of records equals $6500.00 (43,333 copies or 747 copies per month, 1 1/2 packages of copy paper). conservative estimate of cost for copying of Joshua monitoring report for years 1991, 1992, and 1993 would be 1000 pages at 10 copies (includes copies for Court, parties and file) equal 10,000 copies *cost of 10,000 copies at .15 cents per page is $1500.00 Total costs for copying - $8000.00 FACSIMILES average of 100 pages of faxed material per month multiplied by 58 months equals 5800 copies; cost at .10 cents per page equals $580.00; average of 1 case of facsimile paper per month at a cost of $33.18 by 58 months equals $1924.44 *conservative estimate of cost for faxing documents totals $2504.44 in absence of records equals $1250.00 Total fax costs - $1250.00 POSTAGB average of 25 letters to the eight counsel (two to LRSD and one for file) of record per month multiplied by 58 months 58 months equals 11600 letters; 18 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I average cost of postage per letter@ .55 equals $6380.00 *conservative estimate of cost for postage totals $3190.00 in absence of records Total postage costs $3190.00 23. My other work in the Walker firm includes personal injury claim handling, interviewing of potential clients for other cases being handled by the office, conferring with potential clients regarding other school matters across the state, and other duties as assigned by Mr. Walker for which the office currently bills my time at the rate of $50.00 per hour. It is the practice in the Little Rock area to bill paralegal time separately. 24. In the course of my employment at the Walker firm, I have also worked on the following cases: Robert Webb, et al v Missouri Pacific Railroad (employment discrimination); McFadden v Arkansas state Hospital (employment discrimination); Lou-Ease Simmons v Augusta School District (school case/tracking); Judy Smith v Harvest Foods (employment discrimination); Gay Rusk v Stuttgart School District (employment discrimination); Richard Day and Calvin Hollowell v Randy Johnson (employment discrimination); Angela Piggee v Hope School District (employment discrimination); Willie Ashford v The City of !fmburg, et al, (police brutality) and Gloria Leapheart v city of Morrilton (employment discrimination) to name a few. I was awarded a fee of $45.00 per hour in the case of McFadden, et al. y Arkansas State Hospital, Civ. No. LR-C-78-153 as recently as April, 1995 19 I I I I I ., I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I for my work. 23. My work as a paralegal in this case minimizes the fee liability of the districts by reducing the lawyer time expended on the case. I have read the foregoing affidavit and it is true and correct to the best of my knowledge SPRINGER I f1~UBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this ?,.{day of 1/vb-{ , 1995. NOTARY PUBLIC MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: Ci/ 17 l'-1.0~ 20 I I I I I I I ,, I I I I I I I I I I I J IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. NO. LR-C-PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. ACTIVITY STATEMENT OF JOY CHARLES SPRINGER DATE ACTIVITY TIME 6/28/90 Conference with JWW regarding Pulaski .5 County School case 6/28/90 Reading and review of Pulaski County 1.5 school settlement agreement 6/29/90 Conference with JWW regarding Incentive 3.5 school hearing; Preparation for hearing; review of Incentive school plan 6/30/90 Prehearing conference with JWW; Hearing 8.0 before Judge Wright re: Incentive school hearing; abstract of witness testimony 8/5/90 Review of LRSD desegregation plan 3.5 8/21/90 Review of LRSD desegregation plan 4.0 9/8/90 Review of PCSSD desegregation plan 4.0 10/15/90 Review of NLRSD desegregation plan 2.5 1/5/91 Conference with JWW re: implemetationn 3.0 of desegregation plan and discussion re: assistance Joshua can provide to parties re: implementation and identification of problem areas c:\\wpdos\\jcs.stmt 1 PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS AMOUNT I I I I I I I I I I I , , I I I I I I I 1/6/91 1/8/91 1/9/91 1/10/91 1/11/91 1/11/91 1/14/91 1/15/91 1/24/91 1/25/91 1/30/91 2/4/91 2/18/91 c:\\wpdos\\jcs.atmt Conference with JWW re: plan 1.0 implementation, assistance to District, and identification of problem areas Pre-meeting conference with JWW; 1.9 meeting school district officials and lawyers regarding modifications to desegregation plan; took notes; post meeting conference Meeting with school district officials and 6.0 lawyers regarding plan modifications; post meeting conference with JWW Meeting with school districts officials and 5.5 lawyers regarding plan modifications Conference with PCSSD attorney, SJ, to 3.0 discuss plan modifications; travel to his office; parking $4.25 Preparation of memorandum to JWW re: 2.0 meetings with respect to plan modifications Discussion of monitoring instrument with 2.5 JWW; preparation of same Preparation of monitoring instrument 4.0 Preparation for hearing re: Aersospace 4.5 proposal; telephone confemce with CJ re: implementation procedure; telephone with PCSSD,NLRD, LRSD re: implmentation procedure; preparation of exhibits; conference with JWW re: trial strategy Hearing before Judge Wright re: 1.0 Aerospace grant proposal Continued review of Aerospace proposal 2.0 Continued review of Aerospace proposal 2.0 and LRSD desegregation plan Deafted proposal for monitoring activities 6.5 and instrument for Joshua monitoring team 2 I I I I I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2/25/91 2/26/91 2/26/91 2/27/91 2/27/91 2/27/91 2/28/91 2/28/91 c:\\wpdos\\jcs.stmt Conference with Joshua team members to 3.0 discuss monitoring activities and instrument; updated monitoring instrument; discussed LRSD schools to be monitored; conference with JWW Used personal vehicle for travel to Mitchell 1.5 Incentive school to monitor Incentive school program with Joshua team members; conference with principal and visted classrooms Used personal vehicle for travel to lsh 1.5 Incentive school to monitor Incentive school program with Joshua team members; conference with principal and visted classrooms Used personal vehicle for travel to Garland 2.0 Incentive school to monitor incentive school program; conference with principal and visited classrooms Used personal vehicle for travel to 1.5 Stephens lncentve school to mointor incentive school program; conference with principal and visted classrooms Used personal vehicle for travel to 1.5 Rightsell Incentive school to monitor incentive school program; confemce with principal and visited classrooms Used personal vehicle for travel to 2.0 Rockefeller Incentive school to monitor incentive school program; conference with principal and visited clasrooms Conference with team members to discuss 2.5 results of monitoring visits and discussion of monitoring instrument for Incentive schools 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3/1/91 3/4/91 3/4/91 3/5/91 3/5/91 3/6/91 3/6/91 3/7/91 3/7/91 3/7/91 c:\\wpdoa\\jcs.stmt Conference with team members to further 1.5 discuss findings from incentive school visits and formulate draft report on findings Used personal vehicle for travel to lsh and 2.3 Mitchell Incentive schools to observe extended programs Preparation of draft report re: first week's 2.5 observations and findings at Incentive schools Used personal vehicle for travel to LRSD 1.5 elementary schools -Geyer Springs and Cloverdale for discussion and inspection of construction at these school with administration. Court approval? Preparation of report regarding visits to 1.3 elementary "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1666","title":"Court Filings: District Court, affidavit of Opal Sims and affidavit of Ramsey Eddington","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Sims, Opal","Eddington, Ramsey"],"dc_date":["1995-11-21"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Education--Economic aspects","Educational law and legislation","Lawyers","Court records"],"dcterms_title":["Court Filings: District Court, affidavit of Opal Sims and affidavit of Ramsey Eddington"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1666"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["47 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":["Sims, Opal","Eddington, Ramsey"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. LORENE JOSHUA ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. STATE OF ARKANSAS COUNTY OF .~ O;rJ{)le.., AFFIDAVIT OF OPAL SIMS ) )ss. ) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS INTERVENOR$ INTERVENORS Comes now the affiant, Opal Sims, who submits the following affidavit under oath: 1. I received a B.A Degree from the University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff in the Spring of 1980. My program involved a major in the area of physical education and a minor in science. 2. I worked as a substitute teacher in the Plum Bayou Tucker School District during the 1980-81 school year. In 1982 and 1983, I worked in the Job Corps center located in Little Rock. During a part of this employment, I taught a \"life skills\" course to persons served by the center. In 1984 and 1985, I worked as a program manager for Arkansas Career Resources, a non-profit agency located in Little Rock. My work involved developing programs to promote the movement of women from welfare status I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I to involvement in the work force. 3. I was employed as a \"state program specialist\" by the Action Agency, an agency of the United States Government, from February 1986 until 1990. The Action Agency provides funds to generate volunteer activities and takes measures to promote use of the monies in an effective manner, consistent with federal regulations. My work included management oversight, program development, training, program evaluation, and monitoring of programs. My monitoring activities involved on-site review of 25 to 30 programs a year and included observation of the programs, review of records, interviews, and preparation of written reports to the regional office of the Action Agency. 4. I was employed by the John W. Walker law firm in the period from April 8, 1991 through July 7, 1991, as one of the members of the team which prepared the first Joshua Monitoring Report. My work included the following tasks: helping to develop the monitoring instrument; visiting schools; interviewing principals, teachers, and support staff; observing classes; compiling data; writing reports on findings at particular schools; conferring with other monitoring team members and John W. Walker; and helping to write the overall monitoring report, including the recommendations. 5. During my work at the Walker firm, I prepared daily records reflecting the time which I worked and the nature of my activities. Attachment One to this Affidavit sets forth my time and activities, based upon those records. I have read the foregoing affidavit and it is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and information. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I OPAL SI SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this ,2,/ day of /(J{),1,\u002641{) /J$/ , 1995. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 9/ n f:ul!::, YPUBLIC I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ACTMTY STATEMENT - OPAL SIMS In reference to: Little Rock School District, et al. v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al.; Lorene Joshua, et al.; Katherine Knight, et al. (lntervenors) DATE 04/08/91 04/09/91 04/09/91 04/10/91 04/10/91 04/11/91 04/11/91 04/12/91 04/12//91 04/15/91 1991 ACTMTY HOURS Reviewed monitoring instruments; reviewed PCSSD proposed desegregation plan 6.6 Reviewed PCSSD's proposed desegregation plan 3.0 Visit to lsh Incentive School to monitor classes and conference with school principal 4.0 Reviewed interdistrid desegregation plan 3.0 Visit to Garland Incentive School to monitor classes; visit with teachers and held conference with principal 4.0 Reviewed NLRSD's desegregation plan 3.0 Visit to Stephens Incentive school to monitor classes; visit teachers and instrudional aides; and held conference with principal 4.6 Visit with Dr. Cheryl Simmons to discuss increasing parent involvement in school and to schedule parent meeting for an evening at the school .6 Meeting with Joshua monitoring group to review visits for week and to plan reporting 2. 7 Worked on locating phone numbers, addresses of parents with children attending Garland Incentive School; worked on letter notifying parents of meeting scheduled for 4/18 3.0 1 I I DATE ACTIVITY HOURS I 04/15/91 Picked up mailing list of Garland Incentive School parents from LRSD Administrative offices .3 I 04/15/91 Worked on mailing notices for Thursday night meeting at Garland Incentive School 6.0 I 04/16/91 Brady Elementary School observation of classrooms and conference with principal 3.0 I 04/16/91 Went to Bale Elementary School to drop off survey to Mrs. Wilson .5 I 04/16/91 Visited Fuller Jr. High and Mills High School for principal's conferences and classroom observations 4.0 I 04/17/91 Compiled notes from monitoring visits made to Garland, I Stephens, and Bale Elementary Schools 3.0 04/18/91 Attended meeting between attorneys for the PCSSD, LRSD and I Joshua to discuss desegregation plan 2.0 04/18/91 Observation of classroom and conference with principal at I Romine Elementary School 3.0 04/19/91 Conference with monitoring team Mrs. Charles and Mrs. Rouse I to review visits made during the period 4/15-4/18 and to plan for week of 4/22-4/26 1.5 I 04/19/91 Made phone calls to elementary schools to schedule visits for week beginning 4/22 and prepared folders on each school 5.0 I 04122/91 Visit to Fairpark Elementary School for principal confrerence and classroom observation 3.0 I 04/22/91 Visit to Badgette Elementary school for principal conference and classroom observation 2.0 I 04/23/91 Visit to Mabelvale Elementary School for principal conference and classroom observation 2.0 I 04/23/91 Visit to Chicot Elementary School for principal conference and I 2 I I I DATE ACTIVITY HOURS I classroom observation 2.0 I 04/24/91 Visits made to Baseline \u0026 Meadowcliff Elementary Schools for principal conferences and classroom observation 5.5 I 04/25/91 Visits made to Fulbright, Williams and Jefferson Elementary Schools for principal conferences and classroom observation 6.0 I 04/29/91 Visted Wakefield, Geyer Springs and Western Hills Elementary Schools for principal conferences and classroom observation 5.0 I 04/29/91 Made phone calls to parents of Garland Incentive School students to remind them of 4/30 meeting 2.0 I 04/30/91 Visits to Cloverdale, and Watson Elementary Schools for principal conferences and classroom observation 4.0 I 04/30/91 Phone calls to parents about meeting scheduled for 7:30 at Garland Incentive School 1.0 I 04/30/91 Went to Bale Elementary School to pick up survey form. It was not completed as planned (the secretary will call when the form I is completed) .5 04/30/91 Meeting with parents of students attending Garland Incentive I School 2.5 05/01/91 Visits to Gibbs Magnet School and Dunbar Jr. High for I conferences with the principals and classroom observation 4.0 05/02/91 Visit to Mam Magnet and Central High Schools for conference I with principals and classroom observation 4.0 I 05/03/91 Made phone calls to schools in LRSD to schedule appointments for week of 5/6-10 and worked on narratives/survey forms from schools visited during the week 7.0 I 05/06/91 Picked up survey forms from the following schools: Mabelvale Elementary, Wakekfield Elementary, Wilson Elementary, I Western Hills Elementary, Geyer Springs Elementary, Meadowcliff Elementary, Baseline Elementary 5.0 I 3 I I I DATE ACTIVITY HOURS I I 05/06/91 Phone calls to parents to remind them of Tuesday night meeting at Garland Elementary School 2.0 I 05/07/91 Visits to Dunbar Jr. High and Woodruff Elementary for principal conferences 4.0 I 05/09/91 Visits to Metropolitan Vo-Tech and Southwest Jr. High for visit with principals and classroom observation 6.0 I 05/10/91 Organized files and completed survey forms on schools visited to date 4.0 I 05/10/91 Conference with Joshua monitoring team members to plan for I final report and scheduling of visits 2.0 05/13/91 Visited Forest Heights, Jr. High and Mabelvale Jr. High for I conference with the principals and classroom observation 6.0 05/14/91 Visited JA Fair and Washignton Elementary for conference I with the principals and classroom observation 4.0 05/15/91 Visited Scott Elementary and North Little Rock High School for I conference with the principals and classroom observation 5.0 05/17/91 Picked up survey forms from Watson Elementary, Cloverdale I Elementary and Hendeson Jr. High; visited classroom at Henderson Jr. High 2.5 I 05/20/91 Visited Oak Grove Elementary Jr. High and Sr. High for conferences with principals and classroom observation 6.0 I 05/21/91 Visited Robinson Elementary, Robinson Jr. High and Robinson Sr. High for principal's conferences and classroom observation 6.0 I 05122/91 Visits made to Sylvan Hills Elementary, Sylvan Hills Jr. High and Sylvan Hills High School for principal's confrences and I classroom observation 6.0 05/23/91 Visits to Agenta Elementary, and Ridgeroad Middle School for I principal's conferences and classroom observation 4.0 I 4 I I I DATE ACTMTY HOURS I 05/28/91 Visited Metropolitan Vocational-Technical Center for conference with the principal and classroom observation 2.0 I 05/29/91 Made phone calls to schools to schedule appointments to secure survey forms; worked on compiling monitoring materials 6.0 I 05/30/91 Visited LRSD Alternative School Leaming Center for a conference with the principal; also visited Central High School I for classroom observation and teacher conferences 5.5 05/31/91 Visited Scott Elemetary school to pick up survey data; visited I some classrooms. Conference with team members to discuss progress to date 4.0 I 06/03/91 Compiled monitoring materials for report 3.0 I 06/03/91 Franklin Elementary school; helped to conduct interview for Incentive school teachers for the 1991-92 school term 2.0 I 06/04/91 Meeting with Ann Brown, Desegregation Monitor, to discuss monitoring activities in the tri-district schools 2.5 I 06/05/91 Conducted interviews for Incentive School teachers at Franklin Elementary for 1991-92 school year 2.5 I 06/06/91 Picked up survey forms from Fuller Jr. High and MIiis High School 1.0 I 06/07/91 Worked on monitoring report 4.0 06/10/91 Compiled Incentive School data for monitoring report 4.0 I 06/10/91 Participated in interviews for prospective teachers for Franklin I Incentive School for 1991-92 school term 2.5 06/11/91 Worked on LRSD monitoring report 4.0 I 06/12/91 Worked on LRSD monitoring report 6.0 I 06/12/91 Participated in interviews for Franklin Incentive School teaching staff for 1991-92 school year 2.0 I 5 I I I DATE ACTMTY HOURS I 6/13/91 Worked on LRSD monitoring report 7.5 I 06/14/91 Worked on LRSD monitoring report 4.0 06/14/91 Participated in interviews for Franklin Elementary Incentive school I teachers for the 1991-92 school year 3.0 06/17/91 Worked on LRSD monitoring report 7.0 I 06/18/91 Worked on LRSD monitoring report 7.0 I 06/19/91 Worked on monitoring report for LRSD 8.0 I 06/19/91 Conference with Karen Buchanan, principal at Washington Magnet School 2.0 I 06/20/91 Worked on monitoring report for LRSD 6.0 06/21/91 Worked on monitoring report for the LRSD 8.0 I 06/22/91 Participated in interviews for Franklin Incentive School teachers for the 1991-92 school year 3.0 I 06/24/91 Worked on monitoring report for LRSD 6.0 I 06/25/91 Writing of monitoring report section on the LRSD 8.0 06/26/91 Writing monitoring report on LRSD 6.0 I 06/27/91 Writing monitoring report for LRSD 6.0 I 06/28/91 Meeting with teachers from Cloverdale Jr. High School to discuss concerns about the school's administration 3.5 I 06/28/91 Wrote up concerns voiced by Cloverdale Jr. High teachers to be included in the LRSD monitoring report 4.0 I 07/01/91 Worked on monitoring report for PCSSD 7.5 I 07/02/91 Worked on PCSSD monitoring report 6.0 I 6 I - -- -- - - - - - - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DATE 07/03/91 07/03/91 07/05/91 07/06/91 07/08/91 07/09/91 07/09/91 ACTIVITY HOURS Worked on PCSSD monitoring report 4.0 Worked on NLR School District monitoring report 3.0 Compiled numerical data from LRSD, survey forms (incentive, area, magnet elementary schools; magnet and area Jr. High \u0026 magnet and area Sr. High schools) 7.5 Compiled numerical dta from LRSD survey forms (nicentive, area, magnet elementary schools; magnet and area Jr. High schools and magnet and Area High schools) 7.0 Using numerical data from survey froms and talley sheets made revisions to LRSD monitoring report. Also made additional editing/proofing changes 8.0 Worked on revisions to LRSD monitoring report 3.0 Worked on recommendations to be presented to LRSD administrators re: findings/concems from the monitoring report 3.5 TOTAL HOURS EXPENDED 365.3 7 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCKSCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. LORENE JOSHUA ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. STATE OF ARKANSAS COUNTY OF l cnc,KL AFFIDAVIT OF RAMSEY EDDINGTON ) )ss. ) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS INTERVENOR$ INTERVENOR$ Comes now the affiant, Ramsey Eddington, who submits the following affidavit under oath: 1. I am a Certified Public Accountant with my own business located at 201 S. Chester, Little Rock, Arkansas. I compile the business records of John W. Walker, P.A. 2. From data previously secured from the Walker law firm, I compiled the amounts paid by the Walker law firm to Clemetine Rouse, Evelyn Jackson, Delores Sykes, Kirke Herman, Debbie Parker, and LaRhonda Pondexte for the calendar years 1991, 1992, 1993, and 1994. This information is as follows: I I I ., I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PAYEE 1991 1992 1993 1994 Clementine Rouse 2200.00 1000.00 2000.00 Evelyn Jackson 2700.00 Delores Sykes 1000.00 3600.00 3600.00 Kirke Herman 16675.00 8400.00 12732.00 4587.00 Debbie Parker 26,225.81 LaRhonda Pondexter 5218.74 6875.00 I have read the foregoing affidavit and it is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and information. I f.a lr RAMSEt}DDI roN SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this / 7 day of _ _.;.A._' --,-~L';..._;v__. _ _, 1995. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 4/ 1'7 / 200 3 / I NOTARY PUBLIC I I I I, I I I' I I I I I I I I II I I I CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, John W. Walker, hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion and Memorandum of the Joshua lntervenors for an Interim Award of Attorneys' Fees and Costs for Post-Judgment Monitoring have been served individuals listed below, by placing a copy of the same in the United States Mail with sufficient postage prepaid, on this 21st day of November, 1995. Steve Jones, Esq. Jack, Lyon \u0026 Jones, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026 Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Christopher Heller, Esq. Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark . 2000 First Commercial Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Jerry Malone, Esq. rJo Little Rock School District 81 O West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Sam Jones, Esq. Wright, Lindsey \u0026 Jennings 2200 Worthen Bank Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Richard Roachell, Esq. Roachell \u0026 Streett 401 W. Capitol Ave. Suite 504 Little Rock, AR Ms. Ann Brown, Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Little Rock, AR 72201 Tim Humphries, Esq. Attorney General's Office 200 Tower Building 323 Center Street Little Rock, Ar 72201 This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources. "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1627","title":"Court Filings: District Court, declaration of Robert Pressman and affidavit of Austin Porter Jr.","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)","Pressman, Robert","Porter, Austin, Jr."],"dc_date":["1995-11-21"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Education--Arkansas","Educational law and legislation","Lawyers"],"dcterms_title":["Court Filings: District Court, declaration of Robert Pressman and affidavit of Austin Porter Jr."],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1627"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["46 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":["Porter, Austin, Jr.","Pressman, Roberta"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Little Rock Sch. Dist. v. Pulaski County Spec. Sc. Dist. Number 1 Civil Action No. LR-C-82-866, E.D. Ark., Western Div. DECLARATION OF ROBERT PRESSMAN Robert Pressman swears under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct: A. Employment in Civil Rights Division (1.) Following my graduation from Columbia Law School in June 1965, I worked as an attorney in the Civil Rights Division, U.S. Department of Justice, from August 2, 1965 ' through July 31, 1970. The Division enforced civil rights laws concerning voting rights, access to public facilities and public accommodations, school desegregation, equal employment opportunity, and freedom from mistreatment by police personnel. My work at various times involved each of these areas. It encompassed giving guidance to the Federal Bureau of Investigation on investigations of possible civil rights violations and compiling factual material and analyzing complex fact patterns, as well as legal research. (2.) For roughly the first two years of my tenure in the Division, I was assigned to work on problems arising in the northern part of Mississippi. During this period, I frequently travelled to Mississippi and, among other things, made appearances in the Carroll County school desegregation case. I also investigated the status of school desegregation in other systems, including Lee County, Pontotoc County, Tunica County, and the City of Corinth. In 1967, the Division was reorganized and my work shifted to 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Illinois. There, I developed facts concerning school segregation in School District 151 of Cook County, Illinois. The Department's suit against that district was its first northern case. I participated in the trial. See United States v. School District 151, 286 F. Supp. 786, 787 (N.D. Ill. 1968); 301 F. Supp. 201, 205 (N.D. Ill. 1969). My Illinois work also included school segregation issue in Cairo, East St. Louis, and Madison County, Illinois. (3.) In 1969, the Division was again reorganized, this time along subject matter lines. I was assigned to the education section. From October 1969 through my departure from the Division at the end of July 1970, I worked principally on Alabama school desegregation issues, particularly on Lee v. Macon County Board of Education, a statewide case involving 100 local districts, as well as state officials. Efforts were underway in this period to secure implementation of plans satisfying the standards of Green v. County School Board. I prepared written comments on issues arising in more than 30 Alabama districts and appeared frequently before the three-judge court (Judges Richard T. Rives, Frank M. Johnson, and H.H. Grooms). I also appeared before Judge Johnson in the separate Montgomery County school desegregation case and prepared for the Department briefs in two appeals from the decisions of the three-judge court in the Lee case. See, for example, Lee v. Macon County Board of Education, 448 F.2d 746, 747 (5th Cir. 1971). (4.) On December 15, 1969, I received a Certificate of Award for outstanding work, in the Attorney General's Twentieth Annual Awards Ceremony. Four of the Division's ninety attorneys were given this award at that time. 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I B. . Employment at the Center for Law and Education (5.) In August 1970, I began working at the Center for Law and Education (CLE), a component of the federally-funded program of legal services for low-income persons, administered since 1975 by the Legal Services Corporation. As the \"national back-up center'' on education issues for the entire legal services program, the Center's principal role was to promote throughout the program strong representation of clients experiencing education problems. The work consisted of providing advice to legal services personnel on particular client problems; conducting training programs; writing publications and articles; engaging in administrative advocacy; and participating as co-counsel in some cases. My employment at the Center ended as of September 15, 1995, due to lay off, because the Congress chose to eliminate funding for national support programs like CLE. (6.) In 1972, upon its filing, I began working on the Boston school desegregation case as co-counsel for the plaintiff class of Black parents and students. My involvement has continued to the present, although the case is largely inactive with only a few orders remaining in place. See, for example, Morgan v. Hennigan, 379 F. Supp. 410, 414 (O.Mass. 1974) (liability ruling) and Morgan v. McDonough, 540 F. 2d 527, 528 (1st Cir. 1976) (argued appeal in which the court affirmed the placing of the operation of a high school in receivership). Through the years, I had the occasion in Morgan to address the issue of an award of attorneys fees and costs in a number of instances. Indeed, Judge Garrity presently has under submission a request that CLE receive an award for 547 hours of my work in Morgan in the period from October 1988 through June 1993 at a rate of $200 per hour. There were also a number of times through the years when the inquiries from 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I legal services attorneys and other advocates to which I responded concerned fee awards. (7.) In the 1970's I also did some work in the Detroit school desegregation case, Bradley v. Milliken, and more than 1000 hours of work on behalf of the plaintiffsintervenors in the Omaha school desegregation case, United States v. School District of Omaha. See, for example, 521 F.2d 530 (wrote brief for successful appeal with the court's opinion reflecting to a substantial degree the factual statement in the brief). In addition, particularly in the earlier years of my tenure at the Center for Law and Education, legal services attorneys and other advocates asked questions about school desegregation issues in a number of instances, to which I responded. (8.) During the 1970's, I played a role at CLE in the development of a racial discrimination theory ultimately employed successfully in securing a delay in the Florida program of denying standard high school diplomas to students failing a \"competency test.\" See Debra P. v. Turlington, 474 F. Supp. 244 (M.D. Fla. 1979), affd, 644 F.2d (5th Cir. 1981). In the Debra P. litigation, I participated briefly in the trial (due to an illness in the family of a CLE colleague) and wrote a portion of the trial memorandum setting forth a theory accepted by the courts ( denial of standard high school diploma based upon competency test result perpetuated earlier intentional discrimination against black students who began their educations in segregated and unequal elementary schools). (9.) In 1986, I wrote two memoranda on racial discrimination claims for use in the legal services program. (a) The first, focusing on racial discrimination in school discipline and curricula, contained the following headings: ''Typical Problems,\" \"Gathering Information About a Discrimination Problem,\" ''The Legal Bases of Racial Discrimination 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Claims\" (including constitutional and Title VI claims), \"Other Material re Disparate Discipline,\" ''Material Regarding Disaimination in Curriculum,\" and \"Remedial Principles.\" (b) The second memorandum is titled \"Discriminatory Allocation of Resources within a School District\" (14 pages). I first used this document in a training program for legal services attorneys in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in 1986. (10.) I participated during my tenure at CLE, as a trainer or lecturer, in a minimum of 40 sessions on education issues for legal services workers, parents, and\\or students. One such session in the late 1980's for legal services attorneys concerned ways to monitor consent deaees and other judgments in institutional refonn cases. I prepared for this event a lengthy memorandum summarizing and organizing, according to topic, a large number of reported and unreported decisions relevant to the topic of monitoring a decree. C. Work on the Ayers Case (11.) In January 1987, the North Mississippi Rural Legal Services Program asked me to join their staff members providing representation to the named plaintiffs and the plaintiff class in the case then styled Ayers v. Allain, Civil Action No. 4:75CVOO9-B-O, Northern District of Mississippi. Ayers concerns the nature of the obligation of Mississippi officials to eliminate racial disrimination and segregation from the operation of the Mississippi system of public universities. I have played an active role in the case since that time. My work in Ayers through March 1995, totalled in excess of 6,000 hours, and involved, inter alia, framing and responding to discovery requests; taking depositions; identifying and preparing exhibits; preparing exhibit lists and other materials required as 5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I part of the standard pre-trial submission; participating in settlement efforts; making an opening statement; presenting and aoss~xamining witnesses and otherwise participating in two lengthy hearings; 1 preparing proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law; preparing appellate briefs; arguing before a panel of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circui~ as well as that court sitting en bane, 2 and supporting the efforts of my brother and sister co-counsel. Currently, some of my time is spent working on an appeal from the district court's decision on remand, Ayers v. Fordice, 879 F.Supp. 1419 (N.D. Miss. 1995). D. Court Appearances (12.) During the course of my legal career, I have made appearances in the following federal courts: M.D. Ala., S.D.Ala., M.D. Fla., S.D. Fla., N.D. Ill., D. Mass., N. D. Miss., E.D. Mich., D. Neb., D. N. H., and D. S. Car.; Court of Appeals for the First, Fifth and Eleventh Circuits (filed briefs and argued); Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (filed briefs); United States Supreme Court (filed briefs). E. Work in this Case (13.) In September 1995, John W. Walker requested me to assist him and other persons in his firm to prepare a comprehensive fee application for the post-judgment monitoring phase of this case. Attachment One to this declaration, which is incorporated 1 The first hearing in 1987 consumed approximately 25 trial days. In 1992, the United States Supreme Court held that the lower courts had employed the wrong legal standard in dismissing the case, articulated the correct standard, and remanded for further proceedings. see united states Y, Fordice, 112 s.ct. 2727. The hearing on remand in the trial court consumed 44 trial days in 1994. 2 see Ayers v, Allain, 893 F.2d 732 (5th cir. 1990); Ayers y, Allain, 914 F.2d 676, 677 (5th Cir. 1990) (en bane) (argued in each instance). 6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I herein by reference, sets forth my time and activities in working on this project. Because it was necessary for me to learn matters already known by Mr. Walker and his staff, and the nature of some of the work, the motion seeks an award for 120 hours, only 50.2 percent of the time which I actually worked on this very extensive undertaking. I believe that my \"learning curve\" regarding the case was less than it would have been, had I not had extensive experience regarding school desegregation, racial discrimination, monitoring, and fee award issues. (14.) The amount sought for my time is $175 per hour. The following factors support the reasonableness of this hourly rate: (a) the higher rates awarded to John W. Walker by Arkansas district courts as shown by his affidavit, filed with the joshua motion; (b) the approval of rates of $200 per hour to counsel in this case and the Kansas City school desegregation case by the Court of appeals for the Eighth Circuit during the mid- 1980's, as shown by that court's McDonald decision cited in the Joshua memorandum in support of the motion; (c) the rates for Little Rock law firms shown in Arkansas Business, November 13, 1995, at 25; (d) the fact that the Center for Law and Education seeks an award of $200 per hour for my time in the Boston school desegregation case for work in the period from 1988 through 1993; and (e) the fact that the Center seeks an award of $250 per hour for the more than 6000 hours which I worked in the Mississippi higher education case in the period from 1987 to 1994 (with any award to be used by the Center for work on behalf of low income persons). I dedare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing information, and the information set forth in the attachment, which is incorporated herein by reference, are true and correct. 7 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Executed on this :)J)day of tJ ~ , 1995. Robert Pressman STATE OF ARKANSAS ) 1 )ss. COUNTY OF hJ})1tu ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this c20 day of 1995. Notary Public My Commission Expires: 9/;7/~? l I 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IN THE UNITED SATES DISTRICT COURT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. v. LR-C-82-866 PUIASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. ATTACHMENT ONE PIAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS SCHEDULE OF HOURS OF ROBERT PRESSMAN DATE ACTIVITY TIME 9/18/95 Discuss fee 3.00 petition with JWW and JS seeking relevant records, such as docket and ruling of 12/1/92; identify substantive decisions on case; identify pertinent Eighth Cir. \u0026 Ark. fee decisions (MQQon~lg, HslcQissi, Jeffer, etc.); study rel. parts of Schwartz treatise on fees I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 9/19/95 9/20/95 9/21/95 9/23/95 9/24/95 9/25/95 9/26/95 9/27/95 Begin to draft motion; Schwartz treatise (paralegals, rates, fees for fee petition); call to Norman Chachkin ~ status of fees for appeals; read prior LR, vs, PCSSD decisions Study Del. Vallev decision and cases cited on monitoring; identify issues to discuss with JWW Review case docket Read PC settlement agreement \u0026 study parts bearing on fees \u0026 make notes Work on memorandum in support of award of fees for post-judgement monitoring Work on memorandum Work on fee memorandum and motion for award of fees; study docket; study treatise (fees for fee petition and rates) Motion for fees 2.40 1.00 1.00 1.50 7.50 3.00 5.50 0.25 I I 9/28/95 Work on topics for 4.50 JS affidavit and I discuss with JS; work on motion for fees (areas I covered in LR plan); examine transcript 2/24/94 .I n JWW role; work on topics for JWW aff. and fee memorandum I 9/29/95 Work on memorandum 5.50 I 9/30/95 Work on fee memo; 6.50 read Tr. 6/7/94 I and make notes I 10/1/95 Work on fee memo; 7.00 complete Tr. of 6/7/94 and make notes I 10/2/95 Work on Part II. 6.50 of memo; work on I motion in support of fees (attachments) I 10/10/95 Read Duran case 0.16 I (10th Cir.) 10/11/95 Work on memo; 0.80 I research cases on allocation among defendants, cost I of investigators and post-judg. mon. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 10/12/95 10/14/95 10/15/95 10/16/95 10/17/95 10/18/95 Identify tasks to get petition filed; research on waiver issue; work on motion (attachments) Read Tr. of 1/24/94 \u0026 make notes Work on list of tasks (3 pages) Work on RP affidavit for fee petition; speak to JS i:g JWW affidavits in other cases \u0026 securing transcripts Work on RP affidavit; research Eighth Cir. and Ark. cases on scope of settlement/release ; identify and read cases on interim fees; read cases on fees for post-judgement monitoring; topics for JWW affidavit; work on ideas~ para. IV-B of settlement Read Tr. 1/24/94 and make notes; work on \"to do list\"; work on memo in support of motion 1.50 0.50 LOO 2.75 7.66 3.80 I I 10/19/95 Work on memo. , RP 3.25 I affidavit 10/20/95 Read Tr. 1/25/94 3.25 I and make notes 10/21/95 Read transcripts 7.75 , 1/25/94 \u0026 6/28/94 \u0026 make notes; work on memo; work with I JS on aff. (Joshua mon., discipline work); review JS aff. I 10/22/95 Read transcripts 6.25 I 6/28/94, 6/29/94, 3/29/94 and 7/28/94 and make notes; work on I memo; work on motion (attachments) I 10/23/95 Discuss \"to do 1.50 list\" for fee I petition \u0026 issues presented with JWW \u0026 JS; call to CH I n fee petition I 10/24/95 Determine JWW 3.00 hours as reflected in transcripts; review bills I submitted by other counsel in post-settlement period; I help gather \u0026 organize time records for JWW firm I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 10/26/95 10/25/95 10/27/95 10/30/95 10/31/95 11/1/95 Review transcripts at ODM for the period 1/25/91 to 8/3/92 to identify time and role for JWW and other members of the firm and make notes Substantive work on case: work with JS on motion and memorandum n LRSD faculty and administrators Review JS aff. Organize data from review of transcripts of hearings, including members of the firm participating in each hearing: issues to discuss with JS Work on memorandum in support of fees: work on motion (attachment): work on ideas re Para. IV-B of settlement Read decisions on interpreting settlement: plan needed steps in call to JS \u0026 work on JWW hours week of 10/23/95 2.25 2.33 0.33 1.0 7.0 1.0 I I 11/4-5/95 Make notes for 2.0 I section of brief addressing PC settlement agreement (9/89) I 11/7/95 At law library, do 4.25 research on I interpreting contracts (Restatement, I Eighth Circuit and Ark. cases); write part of memo on I contract principles, including reading decisions I 11/8/95 Work on 3.75 I memorandum; compile RP hours on fee petition for affidavit; I review JS compilation of hours I 11/9/95 Organize materials 8.50 n: reconstruction I of JWW time ., 11/10/95 Organize materials 9.00 n: reconstruction of JWW time; check RP schedule of I hours and JS schedule I 11/11/95 Work on 9.50 reconstruction of JWW time with JWW 1 and JS; check JS schedule of hours I I I I I 11/12/95 Work on 10.25 I reconstruction of JWW time with JWW and JS; calculate number of hours I worked by counsel for NLRSD after settlements I 11/13/95 Work on 9.75 reconstruction of I JWW time with JWW and JS; work on memo in support of I fees 11/14/95 Work on 9.50 I reconstruction of JWW time with JWW and JS; interview I Opal Sims u: her work at Walker law firm; brief law student on two 'I projects; discuss Mark B. time with him I 11/15/95 Work on 10.25 reconstruction of I JWW time with JWW and JS; work on Opal Sims and R. I Eddington affs.; prepare motions for extension; I work on summary chart I 11/16/95 Work on 10.25 reconstruction of JWW hours with JWW I and JS I I I I I 11/17/95 Compile hours 9.50 I worked by Friday firm: work on motion (attachment): work I on topics for JWW affidavit: review litigation I expenses: read cases on fees for fee petition: review JS I attachment I 11/18/95 Work on 11.25 memorandum: confer with WAB I 11/19/95 Work on 14.75 memorandum: work I on motion and attachments: confer with JWW n: strategy: work ,, on topics for JS aff. : work on expenses and H. I Hall aff.: identify remaining steps; work on BP I aff. 11/20/95 Work on BP aff.: 4.25 I work with JWW and JS on JWW hours; work on memo and ,, attachments to motion I 238.98 Hours TOTAL I I I I .I , , , , I I I I .I ,, , :, t I t I I I' I I IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. AFFIDAVIT OF AUSTIN PORTER JR. PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS Comes the affiant, Austin Porter Jr., submitting the following affidavit under oath: 1. I graduated from the University of Arkansas at Little Rock in the fall of 1982 with a major in criminal justice. During the spring of 1983, I was awarded one of two Winthrop Rockefeller Scholarships to attend law school at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock (UALR) School of Law. I enrolled at the UALR School of Law during the fall of 1983. I graduated from the UALR School of Law on May 18, 1986. On August 25, 1986, I was admitted to the practice of law before the Bar of Arkansas. I have also been admitted to practice before the United States District Court, Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas. 2. Upon completion of law school, I went to work for Central Arkansas Legal Services (CALS), where I handled cases such as domestic relations, consumer, real estate and landlord tenant. I worked at CALS from August, 1986 until May 5, 1989. I then worked at Walker, Roaf, Campbell, Ivory \u0026 Dunklin. While at this firm, I handled personal injury litigation and criminal matters. I also continued to handle consumer matters. I joined 1 I I I 1, I I t I I I I ,, I I ,, I ,, I I the firm of John W. Walker, P.A. on September 2, 1991, and have been involved in employment discrimination cases and voting rights cases. 3. The professional associations that I hold memberships are: American Bar Association, Pulaski County Bar Association and the W. Harold Flowers Law Society. I served on the Board of Directors of the Pulaski County Bar Association during 1990 and 1991. I served as chairman of the Law Day Committee for the Pulaski County Bar Association. 4. Some of the cases that I have been involved in are: Tammie McFarlin, et al. v. Newport Special School District, 980 F.2d 1208 (8th Cir. 1992); Harrison v. Moore, United States District No. PB-C-91-0468, Johnny Whitfield, et al. v. Forrest City School District, fil..lll, United States District Court No. H-C-88-86, Adams v. Hartwick, United States District Court No. LR-C-86-747, Petty v. Scan, United States District Court No. LR-C-91- 324, Green v. Bell, 308 Ark. 473, 826 S.W.2d 226 (1992), Simmons on Behalf of Simmons v. Hooks, 843 F.Supp. 1296 (ED.Ark. 1994), Gloria Leapheart v. The City of Morrilton, et fil., United States District Court No. LR-C-91-696, Sherri Betton v. Sears. United States District Court No. LR-C-91-852, Willie Ashford v. The City of Hamburg, Arkansas, et al., United States District Court No. 93-1032, Tarar Porter v. Carolyn Staley. United States District Court No. LR-C-94-8, Richard Day and Calvin Hollowell v. F. G. \"Buddy\" Villines, fil..fil., United States District Court No. LR-C-94-849. 5. The fee that I am requesting in this case is $130.00 per hour which is reasonable and commensurate with my experience and qualifications. The rate is comparable to that of other attorneys with my experience, and working in Little Rock, Arkansas who are 2 I , , I 'I I 'I ' I I I I I I (' ,, t ,, 'I I involved in this type of litigation or in general practice. (See the affidavits of Mark D'Auteuil and Jerome Green attached herein as Exhibits \"A\" and \"B\", which were recently submitted in the case of Gloria Leapheart v. The City of Morrilton, et al., United States District Court No. LR-C-91-696). 6. I was recently awarded an hourly rate of $130.00 for the work that I performed in the case of Gloria Leapheart v. The City of Morrilton, et al., United States District Court No. LR-C-91-696 and Willie Ashford v. The City of Hamburg, Arkansas, et al., United States District Court No. 93-1032. 7. The total time that I am seeking to be compensated for in this case is 175.50 hours. 8. The total time of 175.50 hours is a conservative but reasonable submission based upon my time records which were prepared contemporaneously to the performance of the work. I have attached a true and accurate account of the hours that I have expended in representing the Joshua lntervenors and their interest in this case. The total amount of time being billed is submitted upon careful review of my records, and consultation with co-counsel, and necessary reductions of hours have been made in order to avoid unproductive and duplicative work. 9. My time record is being submitted for hours that I have expended for work directly related to this case (68.50) and for hours that are related to this case and came about as a result of students who were referred to our office either by the school districts and/or class members; the total hours for these cases are 1 07. 00 hours. 10. As a result of our representation of the Joshua lntervenors as well as our 3 I I , , 'I I I I I I I I I I' I l ,I t ,, , I I monitoring of the schools in Pulaski County, we are often asked to take cases whereby a student has been disciplined or has been denied some right in school due to race or color. The cases listed below (with the exception of Brandon Nunnely) involved students who were recommended to be suspended and/or expelled from school due to having been charged with a criminal offense. During the school hearings where we would be representing the child, we often argued that it is fundamentally unfair to suspend and/or expel a child for merely being charged with a criminal offense. Furthermore, these students had criminal charges filed against them by the state. A. Cynthia Mahomes/Brandon Nunnely - I represented Brandon Nunnely in a case against the Pulaski County Special School District. Brandon is a handicapped child, and wanted to attend a special Dyslexia school. The PCSSD did not want to pay for this school. A hearing was held, and ultimately the Special Law Judge ruled that the district did not have to pay for this expense. B. Carla Jordan - a student at North Side Jr. High. Ms. Jordan was charged with Battery 2nd, Disorderly Conduct, and Attempted Assault. Ms. Jordan was accused of attacking Nolan Ricks and was charged with Battery 2nd, a class D felony. The Battery charge was thrown out of court, and she was found delinquent on the Disorderly Conduct and Attempted Assault charges. C.. Remal Brown - a student at Sylvan Hills High School. Remal was charged with Criminal Attempt to Commit Rape - Class A felony, Terroristic Threatening - Class D felony, and Battery in 3rd Degree - Class A misdemeanor. Remal was accused of trying to rape a student at Sylvan Hills High School during school hours. This juvenile was 4 , , 1 I I -I I' I 'I I ,, \\ t I I ,I ,'I I II ultimately found delinquent on these charges. D. Richard Ridgel - a student a Joe T. Robinson. Richard was charged with Battery 2nd for striking a teacher during a fight with another student. The juvenile accidently hit the teacher during the fight. The juvenile plead no contest to these charges. E. Kenneth Clay - a student at McClellan High School. This case received a great deal of publicity; the paper reported that a gang fight occurred at school. Kenneth is charged with inciting a riot, a class D felony. Trial on this case is set for trial on January 3 \u0026 4, 1995. This statement is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, records, information and belief. STATE OF ARKANSAS) )ss. COUNTY OF LONOKE ) Austin Porter Jr. ,8 SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me, a Notary Public, on this dOday of !Ver. , 1995. 5 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: q I I l I 2-0o,:s 6 ,, I t t I I 1 \\ I ,, I ,, 1' I I ,I. ' I II I I In reference to: DATE 09/04/91 12/18/91 12/19/91 01/12/92 06/30/92 08/03/92 07/05/93 07/06/93 07/07/93 07/08/93 04/19/94 04/20/94 ACTIVITY STATEMENT -AUSTIN PORTER JR. Little Rock School District, et al. v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al.; Lorene Joshua, et. al.; Katherine Knight, et al. (lntervenors) ACTIVITY HOURS Court appearance before the 8th Circuit of Appeals regarding the proposed plan modifications 3.5 School Hearing before Judge Wright on the financing aspects of the desegregation plan and interdistrict schools 6.5 School Hearing before Judge Wright on the financing aspects of the desegregation plan and interdistrict schools 8. 0 School Hearing before Judge Wright on proposed plan modifications 8.0 School Hearing before Judge Wright the incentive schools 7.5 School Hearing before Judge Wright regarding the LRSD budget 8.0 Reading over school budget - Preparation for the budget hearing 6.5 Reading over school budget - Preparation for the budget hearing 3.5 School hearing before Judge Wright on the LRSD and PCSSD budgets 8.5 School hearing before Judge Wright on LRSD and PCSSD budgets 8.5 Met with client Richard Ridgel 2.0 Court appearance on behalf of Richard Ridgel 1.0 1 I I DATE ACTIVITY HOURS ' 04/28/94 Met with client Richard Ridgel to discuss trial strategy 1.5 ' 06/07/94 Court appearance on behalf of client Richard Ridgel 1.0 09/23/94 Went to juvenile court to copy Ridgel file 1.5 I' 09/25/94 Read Ridgel file 1.0 I 09/28/94 Met with client Ridge; discussion of trial strategy 1.5 09/29/94 Court appearance on behalf of Richard Ridgel 2.5 I' 10/26/94 Met with client R. Brown and parent S. Williams 2.0 discussed case I 10/27/94 Read over Brown file 1.5 ' 11/07/94 Received client's letter; re: school actions .5 I 11/07/94 Spoke with client over the telephone re: case and strategy .5 11/07/94 Spoke with Dr. Patrick Smith, M.D. re: R. Brown .3 I 01/20/95 Met with client K. Clay and parent to discuss case 1.0 t 02/08/95 Conference with Joy Springer re: B. Nunnerly matter .5 02/09/95 Read over Nunnerly file 1.0 I 02/13/95 Read over Nunnerly file 1.0 I 02/14/95 Met with Client C. Mahomes; discussed case 2.5 ii , 02/15/95 Worked on trial brief for hearng on behalf of Nunnerly 8.5 02/16/95 Reviewed evidence and documents in file re: Nunnerly 1.0 t 02/17/95 Dictated letter to Client Mahomes re: hearing .2 \\I 02/19/95 Legal Research re: Nunnerly hearing 2.5 I 2 , , I I' DATE ACTIVITY HOURS I 02/20/95 Hearing preparation and Hearing re: Nunnerly matter 11 .5 I 02/22/95 Spoke with Ms. Mahomes re: Nunnerly hearing .2 02/24/95 Hearing preparation re: Nunnerly matter 1.5 I 02/24/95 Hearing re: Nunnerly matter 5.5 I 03/01/95 Court appearance on behalf of R. Ridgel 1.5 03/13/95 Worked on Findings of Fact re: Nunnerly matter 6.5 , , 03/14/95 Worked on Findings of Fact re: Nunnerly matter 6.5 I 03/22/95 Met with client K Clay and parents; discussed hearing strategy 1.0 I 03/23/95 Court Appearance - LR. Municipal Court on behalf of K Clay 1.5 05/05/95 Went to juvenile court to pick up subpoenas and prepared for I service re: R. Brown matter 2.5 11 05/15/95 Spoke with witnesses re: R. Brown matter 1.5 I 05/17/95 Went to juvenile court to copy file re: Brown matter 2.0 t 05/25/95 Preparation for hearing re: R. Brown matter 4.5 05/26/95 Hearing re: R. Brown matter 4.0 I 06/15/95 Spoke with clients' sister and aunt re: hearing of R. Brown .5 ' 06/15/95 Dictated letter to client re: hearing of R. Brown 1.5 I, 07/17/95 Met with client C. Jordan 2.0 07/17/95 Read over Jordan file 1.0 ' 07/19/95 Court Appearance - Pulaski County Circuit Court on behalf of K Clay 2.0 I 07/19/95 Spoke with the case coordinator for Judge Warren re: C. Jordan.25 I 3 I I I DATE ACTIVITY HOURS I 07/20/95 Received letter from case coordinator re: C. Jordan matter .1 I 08/02/95 Spoke with client and Dr. Smith re: R. Brown matter .5 08/07/95 Court appearance on behalf of R. Brown 1.0 ' 09/19/95 Prepared Motion for Discovery re: K Clay matter 1.0 I. 09/21/95 Copied file in Prosecuting Attorney's Office re: K Clay matter 2.0 09/21/95 Read over clients' file re: K Clay matter 3.5 I' 09/21/95 Drafted Motion for Severance re: K Clay matter 2.5 I 09/22/95 Court Appearance on behalf of K Clay 1.5 09/22/95 Spoke with Larry Jegley re: K Clay matter .2 I 10/30/95 Dictated letter to client C. Jordan .25 I 11/14/95 Hearing in Juvenile Court on behalf of C. Jordan 1.7 I t TOTAL HOURS EXPENDED 175.2 II I I ' 11 I 4 I, This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources. "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1613","title":"Court Filings: District Court, motion and memorandum of the Joshua intervenors for an interim award of attorneys' fees and costs for post-judgment monitoring","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Walker, John W."],"dc_date":["1995-11-21"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Educational law and legislation","Education--Economic aspects","Court records","Lawyers"],"dcterms_title":["Court Filings: District Court, motion and memorandum of the Joshua intervenors for an interim award of attorneys' fees and costs for post-judgment monitoring"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1613"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["legal documents"],"dcterms_extent":["12 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_777","title":"Report: ''Little Rock School District 1995-96 First Quarter Status Report, Program Planning and Budget Document for Desegregation Programs,'' Volume 1, exhibit 1","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1995-11-21"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance"],"dcterms_title":["Report: ''Little Rock School District 1995-96 First Quarter Status Report, Program Planning and Budget Document for Desegregation Programs,'' Volume 1, exhibit 1"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/777"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["budgets"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nVOLUME I LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FILED district ARSaksAS 1995-96 FIRST QUARTER STATUS REPORT NOV 2 'I 1995 JAMiS V/. MCCORMACK, PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGET DOCUMENT FOR DESEGREGATION PROGRAMS By: CLERK DcP CtERK PLANNING, RESEARCH, AND EVALUATION DEPARTMENT November 21, 1995 EXHIBIT 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SEQUENCE tt PAGE# SEQUENCE tt PAGE ft Preface 1 SCHOOL OPERATIONS CLUSTER (BUFF) 09A,l - 18,2 Mission 3 Goals 4 District Financial Summary 5 Definitions 6 Organization of the Report 9 Cluster Budget Documents 11 09A 09B 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 School Operations (Principals) School Operations (Central Off. Adm.) Extracurricular Participation Smdent Hearing Officer In-School Suspension New Futures Academic Incentive Grants/Focused Activities McClellan Community School Unassigned Testing Assistance - Disadvantaged Job Fair 09A,l-82 09B,l-59 10,1-14 11,1-3 12,1-55 13,1-4 14,1-8 15,1-8 17,1-3 18,1-2 CURRICULUM CLUSTER (PINK) 01,1 -08,15 SCHOOL SUPPORT CLUSTER (BLUE) 20,1 - 35,3 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 HIPPY 4 Year Old Program/City Wide Early Childhood Education Program Academic Support Program (PAL) Multicultural Curriculum Special Education Gifted Education Federal Programs Vocational Education 01,1-7 02,1-8 03,1-10 04,1-23 05,1-36 06,1-7 07,1-7 08,1-15 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Unassigned Office of Desegregation/Student Assignment Staff Development Library/Media Computerized Transportation Data Processing Unassigned Minority Teacher Recruilment Educational Equity Monitoring Commitment to Desegregation/Leadership Summer School (Interdistrict) Summer Learning Program - JTPA 20,1-15 21,1-12 22,1-7 23,1-4 24,1-31 26,1-6 27,1-3 28,1-3 29,1-8 30,1-9 ISEQUENCE PAGE# SEQUENCE H PAGE# 31 32 33 34 35 36 Unassigned Unassigned Facilities Guidance/Counseling Program Leadership Employment Practices Unassigned 33,1-4 34,1-9 35,1-3 RECRUITMENT CLUSTER (PURPLE) 37,1 - 39,10 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 37 38 39 40 Parent Involvement - Recruitment VIPS - Recruitment Public Relations Unassigned 37,1-18 38,1-10 39,1-10 INCENTIVE SCHQQLS CLUSTER (YELLQW) 41,1 - 72,13 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 Qffice of Incentive Schools Writing to Read Science Labs Unassigned Foreign Language Program Unassigned Extended Day/Week Field Trips Unassigned Tranportation Unassigned Unassigned Instructional Aides Extended Year Recognition Program 41,1-10 42,1-2 43,1-3 45,1-2 47,1-9 48,1-4 50,1-2 53,1-5 54,1-4 55,1-3 Camp Pfeifer Monitoring Unassigned Unassigned Unassigned Staffing Required Staff Development Teacher Stipends/lnservice Qther Incentive Schools Academic Programs Peer Tutors/Retired Teacher Mentors Themes Kindergarten Reading Across the Curriculum Qral Expression Across Curriculum Learning Styles Inventory Semi-Departmental Instructional Tech Study/Test-Taking Parent Home Study ~ Computer Managed Instruction Student Education Plans Specialized Programs Incentive Programs Homework Criterion-Referenced Test Heterogeneous Grouping Effective Schools ~ African/American History 56,1-2 57,1-11 61,1-10 62,1-18 63,1-3 64,1-19 iiSEQUENCE H PAGE SEQUENCE H PAGE# 65 Social Skills Family Folklore Positive Imaging Interpersonal Skills Rites of Passage Mentoring Program 65,1-5 71 Counseling/Social Work Community Services Access College/Post Graduate Awareness ~ Study Skills Home/Neighborhood Meet ~ Wellness Program 71,1-15 66 Special Activities Peer Tutoring Program Academic Reinforcement Clubs Special Interest Clubs 66,1-5 72 73 74 School Policies and Procedures - Qther Unassigned Unassigned 72,1-13 67 68 69 Latin Enrichment Program Unassigned Career Skills Development 67,1-6 STUDENT CHQICES/QPTIQNS CLUSTER (GREEN) 75,1 - 82,3 70 69,1-2 Incentive Schools Qperations Support Services 70,1-5 Community Access/Field Trip Community Involvement Special Skills Program Special Training Parental Involvement - Learning Time Schedule Home/School Community Extracurricular Program - Attendance and Behavior - Subject Related Extracurriculum 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 Student Choices/Qptions Unassigned Unassigned Unassigned Unassigned Qriginal Magnets Unassigned M-to-M Magnet Schools (Central, Dunbar, Washington, Henderson, McClellan) QRGANIZATIQNAL CHART Hi 75,1-2 80,1-7 82,1-3PREFACE The mission statement and goals for the Little Rock School District are the guidelines for all decision making. The Program Budget Document provides additional direction for quality, interim and summative decision-making for the district. The Program Budget Document is a monitoring instrument used by the Little Rock School District to assist with the planning and budgeting process. The PBD provides an overview of all district programs. This reporting method allows the district to monitor the performance and expenditures of each program and take corrective measures throughout the year rather than at the end of the year. The 1995-96 First Quarter Status Report Program Budget Document for Desegregation Plan Programs list achievements and expenditures occurring during the first quarter (July 1, 1995 - September 30, 1995). Several reporting practices should be noted as follows: The first quarters report consist of two volumes for desegregation program reporting: Volume I (Seq fl's 1-18) and Volume II (Seq#s 19-82). 09A is the designated sequence number for reporting achievements by Principals, and 09B is the number relative to achievements of Central Office Administrators. Desegregation Monitoring Audits are conducted annually resulting in the inclusion of additional desegregation obligations in the Program Budget Document. The first desegregation audit was completed during the fourth quarter of the 1993-94 fiscal year. This years audit will be conducted according to schedule. All court orders, hearing transcripts, monitoring reports and stipulations will be reviewed. As a result of the ongoing audits and the refinement process some obligations and/or strategies have been deleted from the following programs: Four Year Old, Multicultural Curriculum, Library/Media, Educational Equity Monitoring, Commitment to Desegregation Leadership, VIPS Recruiting, Public Relations, Office of Incentive Schools, Incentive Schools Staffing, Office of Incentive School Academic Activities, Counseling and Social Work, School Policy and Procedures, Student Choices \u0026amp; Options, Office of Desegregation/Student Assignment, School Operations 9A, Tri-District Summer School, Facilities, Parent Involvement, Original Magnets, HIPPY and M-to-M Magnets. Programs that have been removed because all of their objectives and strategies were dropped from the PBD include: Bidding Practices, Rockefeller Early Childhood, Romine Interdistrict School, Computer Loan Program, Computer Lab Program, King Interdistrict School and Contingencies. ]The First Quarter Status Report Program Planning and Budget Document for Desegregation Programs contains the following: (1) The Mission Statement of Little Rock School District\n(2) The Goals of Little Rock School District\n(3) LRSD Quarterly Desegregation Expenses Summary\n(4) Definitions and Data Elements\n(5) Organization of the Report\n(6) Program Budget Documents Grouped by Clusters\nand, (7) The LRSD Organizational Chart. 9 JLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Little Rock School District is to provide a quality, integrated educational program which encourages all children to achieve their optimum acadendc sLial, and emotional development. To that end. the students in the Little Rock School D strict will develop an appreciation for ethnic and cultural diversity, develop skills in problem solving and conflict resolution, and demonstrate mastery of the District s cuniculum. This will be achieved through the collaborative efforts of a Board, a dedicated and competent staff, and of parents and citizens committed to fairness. racial equity and adequate support for education. 31. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT GOALS The LRSD will implement integrated educational programs that will ensure all students grow academically, socially and emotionally with emphasis on basic skills and academic enrichment while closing disparities in achievement. The LRSD will develop and maintain a staff that is well-trained and motivated. The Little Rock Board, administration, staff, and students will demonstrate in their day to day behavior that they accept each individual as a valued contributor to society and view cultural diversity among students, staff and the community as a valued resource upon which our community and nation can draw as we prepare for the 21st Century. The LRSD will solicit and secure financial and other resources that are necessary to fully support our schools, including our desegregation plan. The LRSD will provide a safe and orderly climate that is conducive to learning for all students. The LRSD will ensure that equity occurs in all phases of school activities and operations. 4 Little Rock School District Quarterly Desegregation Expenses Page 1 of 2 Program Code 01 02 05 06 07 08 09 10 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 22 24 25 26 27 28 29 32 33 34 35 49 51 52 53 54 Program Name HIPPY_________________________________ 4-YEAR OLD PROGRAM________________ STUDENT HEARING OFFICER___________ OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION___________ EXTRA-CURRICULAR PARTICIPATION TEACHER RECRUITER STAFF DEVELOPMENT_________________ ACADEMIC SUPPORT PROGRAMS MULTICULTURAL PROGRAMS__________ ACADEMIC INC GRANTS/FOCUSED ACT ORIGINAL MAGNETS___________________ SPECIAL EDUCATION @ WASHINGTON D/P SYSTEM STUDENT INFORMATION M TO-M MAGNET SCHOOLS___________ KING INTERDISTRICT SCHOOL EDUCATIONAL EQUITY MONITORING COMPUTERIZED TRANSP SYSTEM ROMINE INTERDISTRICT THEME________ McClellan community school IN-SCHOOL SUSPENSION job fair TESTING ASSISTANCE_________________ LIBRARY SERVICES____________________ PARENT RECRUITING___________________ VIPS RECRUITING______________________ COMMITMENT TO DESEGREGATION CONTINGENCY FUND OFFICE OF INCENTIVE SCHOOLS WRITING TO READ_____________________ SCIENCE LABS COMPUTER LABS Budget 95-96 233,228.63 2,082,112.79 94,826.02 500,451.75 82,400.00 53,469.17 448,983.75 1,592,924.90 123,868.60 183,900.00 4,336,650.00 56,846.12 717,087.08 359,648.82 1,510,533.27 478,054.39 6,800.00 67,151.00 40,000.00 773,598.00 _______929.00 4,307.00 409,808.64 34,000.00 36,943.36 5,000.00 _________0.00 _________0.00 _________0.00 _________0.00 0.00 FTEs 20.50 88.00 2.00 13.00 0.00 1.00 7.00 75.60 5.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 5.00 7.40 58.50 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.10 0.00 0.00 16.00 0.00 2.00 ' 0.00 0.00 ' 0.00 0.00 0.00 ' 0.00 \" YTD Expense 23,352.90 204,721.39 23,067.57 117,897.77 0.00 13,165.13 78,332.41 132,025.63 11,354.76 2,278.62 __________0.00 8,944.07 601,721.26 28,464.69 151,406.29 161,918.28 __________0.00 53,029.12 __________0.00 87,680.06 __________0.00 __________0.00 32,881.28 298,48 2,945.76 0.00 __________0.00 __________0.00 _______aoo_ 0.00 0.00 1st Quarter 23,352.90 204,721.39 23,067.57 117,897.77 0.00 13,165.13 78,332.41 132,025.63 11,354.76 2,278.62 0.00 8,944.07 601,721.26 28,464.69 151,406.29 161,918.28 ________0.00 53,029.12 0.00 87,680.06 ________0.00 _______0.00 32,881.28 298.48 2,945.76 0.00 0.00 _______0_00^ 0.00 0.00 0.00 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter % Budget Spent 10.01% 9.83% 24.33% 23.56% 0.00% 24.62% 17.45% 8.29% 9.17% 1.24% 0.00% 15.73% 83.91% 7.91% 10.02% 33.87% 0.00% 78.97% 0.00% 11.33% 0.00% 0.00% 8.02% 0.88% 7.97% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 5Little Rock School District Quarterly Desegregation Expenses Page 2 of 2 Program Code 56 57 59 61 64 65 66 72 73 74 75 Program Name COMPUTER LOAN PROGRAM EXTENDED DAY FIELD TRIPS TRANSPORTATION (ADD'LJ INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES________________ EXTENDED YEAR INCENTIVE/RECOGNITION______________ RECOMMENDED STAFFING REQUIRED STAFF DEVELOPMENT TEACHER STIPENDS/INSERVICE OTHER INCENTIVE SCHOOL ACTIVITIES TOTAL Budget 95-96 0.00 440,719.00 31,500.00 0.00 313,763.93 38,678.00 6,893.00 581,135.13 27,696.00 27,176.00 36,663.00 15,737,746.35 FTEs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.00 0.00 0.00 19.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 378.44 YTD Expense __________0.00 9,751.30 1,305.42 __________0.00 31,176.71 38,942.04 __________0.00 51,226.85 __________0.00 __________0.00 __________0.00 1,867,887.79 Ist Quarter _________0.00 9,751.30 1,305.42 _________0.00 31,176.71 38,942.04 0.00 51,226.85 _________0.00 _________0.00 _________0.00 1,867,887.79 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter % Budget Spent 0.00% 2.21% 4.14% 0.00% 9.94% 100.68% 0.00% 8.81% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 11.87% 6DEFINITIONS AND DATA ELEMENTS The following are definitions of terms and data elements used in the Program Budget Documents. Program: A program is an need. established plan of operation, composed of a group or series of related activities which are carried out to serve a specific area of identified Program Description: A program description includes a purpose, scope and content, and participants/beneficianes related to the respective program. Program Goal: A program goal is a broad guiding statement and should describe the overall aim(s), purpose(s), or ambition(s) of the specific program. Objectives: Program objectives present explicitly the desired impact the program should have on a problem. They should provide detail to the goals. Strategies: Strategies are the jobs, tasks, efforts, or actions undertaken in a program which contributes to the accomplishment of the objective. Achievements: Achievements are efforts, tasks, evidence, performance, or actions undertaken in a program which contributes to the accomplishment of the strategy. Achievements are placed in alpha order underneath the relative strategy. Evaluation Criteria: Evaluation criteria are statements which specify the end product of an objective performance of the product. Page: Each Program Budget Document uses one of two formatted pages. or strategy and establish measurable and observable levels of Program Sequence H (Seq. #): The purpose of this sequence number is to establish a reference for placing programs in order within the planning document. Revision Date: This date is the actual date the program document was first documented or last changed. Program Name: To eliminate confusion, an established name for each program has been assigned by the district planner. Program Code: This is a unique accounting code assigned by Financial Services which links budget and expenditure information to the associated program. 7Definitions and Data Elements (cont.) Primary Leader: The Primary Leader is the cabinet-level associate responsible for the management and operation of the respective program. Secondary Leader: The Secondary Leader is the associate who is back-up to the Primary and will function in that capacity in the absence of the Primary (i.e. the Program Manager or the Principal). District Goal Support: Each program directly supports at least one district goal. If more than one district goal is relative, then the appropriate district goals have been listed in descending priority order. Plan Reference: Specific plan and page references will directly cite one of the following desegregation documents: L(LR) = LRSD Desegregation Plan\nI(ID) = Interdistrict Desegregation Plan\nS = Settlement Agreement\nC(CO)= Court Orders\nT (HT) = Hearing Transcripts\nP(CP) = Court Pleadings\nM(MR) Monitoring Reports. The format should be L23 or 113-20, for example. This element has been left blank if the program is not directly cited in one of the desegregation documents. Plan Reference Page Number\nSource references listed for each objective and strategy have been used. If the objective or strategy is desegregation document related, the specific desegregation document and page upon which this objective or strategy has been found should be listed. If the objective or strategy is not related to a desegregation document, then whatever source was used has been listed. This element is contained on page 2 and succeeding pages. Beginning Date: This is the actual date a particular strategy began. For consistency, all dates should be printed in the following manner: MM/DD/YY, (09/30/94). Completion Date. This is the actual date a particular objective or strategy was completed. For consistency, all dates should be entered in the following format: MM/DD/YY, (09/30/94). If an activity toward a strategy has been started but not completed, a percent of completion (for example, 75%) should be entered. Responsibility: This is the name of the individual tasked with ensuring an activity has been accomplished. ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORT This section provides guiding information about the text of the First Quarter Status Report Program Planning and Budget Document for Desegregation Programs. Pagination. Pages in the text are numbered using Arabic numerals. Pages are consecutively numbered at the bottom of the page beginning with the \"Preface.\" The \"Table of Contents\" is on page i, page ii, and page iii. Program areas are numbered according to their sequence number followed by the page number within that program (e.g., 02,5 refers to page 5 of the program with a sequence number of 02). Print. The report employs two kinds of print density. Bold Print denotes original language of the desegregation document(s). Lighter print enclosed in parentheses (parenthetical statements) identifies language that is not literal in the desegregation document(s). The parenthetical statements of lighter print have been integrated throughout the program budget documents for clarification of original language in the desegregation document(s) and/or for providing information generalized from the original language of the desegregation document(s). Parenthetical information should not be construed to mean new legal obligations nor expansion of the obligations under the desegregation document(s). Underlined Print. Underlined Print denotes additional desegregation obligations language which was inserted verbatim in the third quarter report of FY 93-94 as a result of the desegregation audit. 12/09/93 MR *. Denotes additional desegregation obligations language which was inserted as a result of the 1994-95 desegregation audit. Clusters. Programs have been sorted into broad categories called clusters. Clusters include programs or schools grouped together because of similar and related operational functions. For convenience and management of the report, similar programs have been grouped into six separating color-coded clusters. To locate a program, determine the relative cluster of the program by using the \"Table of Contents\" and then refer to the program sequence number (Seq #) or page number for facilitating program reference in the report. School Operations Program (09A and 09B). The School Operations program description warrants that both Principals and Central Office Administrators provide quality planning for students. Therefore, the School Operations Program is divided into two sections for reporting achievements by both Principals and Central Office Administrators. The sequence number for reporting by Principals (i.e., schools) is 09A, and the sequence number for reporting by Central Office Administrators is 09B. For the first reporting period, the inclusionary dates cited in the \"Beginning Date\" column and \"Completion Date\" nOrganization of the Report (continued) column are 07/01/95 and 06/30/96, respectively. These inclusionary dates represent the boundaries for the first quarter. The generic dates of 07/01/95 and 06/30/96 are used to uniform and conform reporting in the School Operations' program budget documents. Specific date information relative to the achievements of Central Office Administrators follows each documented achievement. As a final note, the School Operations Program (09A) classifies the area, interdistrict, and magnet schools into three organizational levels: elementary iiinmr hiok anzi cona/At* kink ' junior high, and senior high. Incentive Schools. The Incentive Schools cluster provides program reporting information for the following schools: Franklin, Garland Rockefeller Mitchell and Rightsell. Non-Monetary Tracking. No entry on page one in the fiscal year program budget field and/or the quarter expenditure field of a Program Budget Document means desegregation money has not been tracked to the respective program. Organizational Chart. An organizational chart is provided. 10 JCLUSTER BUDGET DOCUMENTS 11Curriculum Cluster * HIPPY A-Year Old Program/City Wide Early Childhood Education Program Academic Support Program Multicultural Curriculum Special Education Gifted Programs Federal Programs Vocational Education af\nILRSD FY 95-96 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Program Seq #: 01 Page: 1 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: HIPPY (Home Instruction Program For Preschool Youngsters) Program Code: 01 Primary Leader: Steriing Ingram Secondary Leader: Marian Shead Program Description: HIPPY is a home based developmental program which recognizes the mother as the first significant teacher of the child. HIPPY assists the mother in preparing the child to be successful in kindergarten, therefore assisting in the reduction of the disparity gap between black and white students. HIPPYS major focus is in the shadow areas of major incentive schools and in the Southwest Little Rock area. HIPPY serves primarily economical and educational disadvantaged families. District Goal Support: Program Goal: Implement integrated educational programs that will ensure that all students grow academically, socially and emotionally with emphasis on basic skills and academic enrichment while closing disparities in achievement. To prepare economically disadvantaged children to enter kindergarten with the necessary skills to be successful\nand to improve the educational outcomes of studenu. particularly black students as it relates to the achievement disparity between black and white students. Plan References: Page L-5. L-14, IS. 16 ] FY Program Budget: $233,228.63 1st Qtr Expend: $23,352.90 3rd Qtr Expend: FTE 22.0 YTD Expenditures: $23,352.90 2nd Qtr Expend: 4th Qtr Expend: Related Function Codes: 01. 1Program Seq f: 01 Program Name: HIPPY Program Code\n01 Program Goal: Plan Reference Page Number LI4 L14 LRSD FY 95-96 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Page: 2 Revision Date: Marian Shead November 6, 1995 To prepare economically disadvanugcd children to enter kindergarten with the necessary skills to be success: and to Improve the educational outcomes of students, particularly black students as it relates to the achievement disparity between black aixl white students. Objectives Strategies Beginniirg Dale Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1. 2. 3. To promote the HIPPY program To select HIPPY aides Initial (raining of aides and suff 07/01/95 06/30/96 Staff Mailed letters (Documenution of PSA) 1.1 To compose and mail Public Service Announcement for local radio sutions and Channels 14 and 16 \u0026amp; distribute flyers A. Distributed flyers to Watershed Community Development B. Mailed PSA to LRSD Communication Department C. Distributed flyers to day care centers, health department, and local businesses D. Had information booth at University Mall 2.1 Interview and select ten (10) Home Visitors A. Interview and select Home Visitors B. Printed and mailed flyers to area churches C. Ran classified ad in two local newspapers 01, 2 08/01/95 08/21/95 O8\\OI\\95 08/16/95 07/01/95 08/19/95 07/01/95 08/29/95 09/11/95 08/06/95 08/01/95 08/21/95 08/01/95 09/29/95 06/30/96 08/19/95 06/30/96 06/30/96 09/11/95 09/13/95 Suff Staff Staff Suff Suff Suff Suff Coordinators Suff Suff Pay the bill (requisition paid) JPage: 3 Program Seq #: 01 Revision Date\nNovember 6, 1995 Program Name: HIPPY Program Code: 01 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Marian Shead Program Goal: To prepare economically disadvantaged children to enter kindergarten with the necessary skills to be success\nand to improve the educational outcomes of students, particularly black students as it relates to the achievement disparity between black and while students. LI4 LI4 L14 LI4 LI4 L14 L14 Pbn Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 4. To enroll families into program. 6. To determine service of coordinators 7. To assign families to be serviced by aides. 8. To organize instructional material. 9. To familiarize aides of the HIPPY implementation in LRSD. 10. Obtain material for program 11. To orientate enrolled families to the HIPPY program. 3.1 Arrange logistics with State Regional Office for the initial training 4.1 Conduct home interview and enroll families into program. 5.1 Compose and mail correspondence to community churches to recruit families and instructional aide trainees. 6.1 Identify families to be served by each coordinator 7.1 Identify families to be served by each aide 8.1 Print curriculum material. 9.1 Conduct two (2) day workshop 01, 3 07/01/95 07/01/95 08/28/95 09/11/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 09/13/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 06/30/96 08/29/95 09/11/95 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 09/14/95 06/30/96 06/30/96 Supervisor Supervisor Coordinators Supervisor Coordinators Supervisor Coordinators Supervisor Coordinators Coordinators Coordinators Supervisor Coordinators Supervisor Coordinators Supervisor Coordinators Pay the bill (Documentation of family enrollment) Assignment of families to aides Families enrolled in program (documentation of parent orientation)Page: 4 Program Seq #: 01 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: HIPPY Program Code\n01 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Marian Shead Program Goal: To prepare economically disadvantaged children to enter kindergarten with the necessary skills to be success\nand to improve the educational outcomes of students, particularly black students as it relates to the achievement disparity between black and white students. L15 Plan RefererKe Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Dale Comf^etion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 13. To schedule implementation of HIPPY curriculum. 11.1 Conduct orientation meeting. A. Secured space for orientation (Adult Education Auditorium from Paulette Martin, Adult Education director B. C. D. 09/25/95 09/25/95 09/11/95 09/11/95 Staff Invited LRSD Personnel to Orientation Prepared program agenda for orientation Orientation conducted 12.1 Secure meeting sites for group meeting, (mailed letters Io building principals) 12.2 Mail out notification of meeting sites. 13.1 To schedule aides weekly home visits 13.2 To schedule area group meetings print flyers 13.3 To schedule weekly Inservice Training for aides 01, 4 09/19/95 09/22/95 09/25/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 09/19/95 09/22/95 09/25/95 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 Staff Staff Staff Coordinators CooRlinators Supervisor CoordinatorsPage: 5 Program Seq 9\n01 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: HIPPY Program Code: 01 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Marian Shead Program Goal: To prepare economically disadvantaged children to enter kindergarten with the necessary skills to be success\nand to improve the educational outcomes of students, particularly black students as it relates to the achievement disparity between black and white students. LI5 Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies 13.4 Schedule aides first teaching (with own child). Beginning Date 07/01/95 Comfdetion Date 06/30/96 Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 14. To provide parents with information that will assist them with their children. 07/01/95 06/30/96 Supervisor Coordinators Received materials 14.1 Schedule workshop for parents and aides, mail out and print materials. 07/01/95 06/30/96 Supervisor Coordinators 14.2 Include enrichments for parents at monthly Group Meetings 07/01/95 06/30/96 L15 16. To determine program success 09/01/94 06/30/96 Completion of survey Evaluation using the Early Prevention of School Failure or a similar model which is comparable in validation scope and developmental grounding, will be corxlucted on the HIPPY participants as they enter and exit the kindergarten. A standardized achievement test will be given to each child at the end of the third grade level. L6 16.1 Conduct survey of parents - print materials 07/01/95 06/30/96 16.2 Telephone survey conducted 07/01/95 06/30/96 Supervisor Coordinators Coordinators 01, 5r Page: 6 Program Seq 9: 01 Revision Date: November 6. 1995 Program Name: HIPPY Program Code: 01 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Marian Shead Program Goal: To prepare econonrieally disadvaniaged children Io enter kindergarten with the necessary skills to he success\nand to improve the educational oulcoines of students, pattioularly black sludenis as it relates to the achievement disparity between black arwl white students. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria LI6 LI6 L16 L16 LI6 L16 19. Provide parents with information to be successful with their children 20. Build the aides children self esteem. 21. Graduation of HIPPY children and aides reception 23. Suff in place. 24. Mainuin regular suff. 25. To assist in traveling expense. 07/01/95 06/30/96 Supervisor Consultant fee paid 19.1 Obuin a site and speaker and schedule a lecture for parents 19.2 Hold Parent Appreciation/Motivational Program 20.1 Activities throughout program year with involvement for children\ni.e. fall carnival, holiday party, black history program, group meetings, graduation \u0026amp; recognition ceremony 21.1 Staff will organize 23.1 To begin implemenution of HIPPY program. 24.1 Secreury 01, 6 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 Supervisor Staff Staff Coordinator Coordinator Supervisor Aides Consultant fee paid Suff began implemenution of program To assist in the implementation of program Pay stipend E IPage: 7 Program Seq *: 01 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: HIPPY Program Code: 01 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Marian Shead Program Goal: To prepare economically disadvantaged children to enter kindergarten with the necessary skills to be success\nand to improve the educational outcomes of students, particularly black students as it relates to the achievement disparity between black and while students. L6 L6 Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 25.1 Aides made home visit. 07/01/95 06/30/96 26. The home-based program and the four-year-old school-based program will collaborate in the areas of parental involvement and teacher training. 27. The Little Rock School and Pulaski County School Districts will collaborate and coordinate the on-eoine implementation of the HIPPY Program. 01, 7 07/01/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 06/30/96Program Seq f: 02 Program Name: Program Code: Program Description: District Goal Support: Program Goal: [ Plan ReferciKes: FY Program Budget: YTD Expenditures: LRSD FY 95-96 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Four-Year Old Program/City-Wide Early Childhood Program 02 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Pat Price Page: I RevisioD Date: November 20, 1995 The purpose of the program is to meet the growing needs of disadvantaged students and to improve the racial balance al schools that are difficult to desegregate by incorporating Early Childhood Education programs into the Elementary schools. The program provides eaperiences for young children which meet their needs and stimulate learning in all developmental areas - physical SMial. emononal. a^ inlellecmal^non^ r identification of program sites will be given to areas that have a very high concentration of low income students and in schools that are difficult to desegregate. The Distncl s preschool cumculum rnojelwilljs^ implemented in all incentive schools and other selected schools in the Lillie Kock School Dislrict Efleclive the 1990-91 school year, this model vvill be an integral pan of effort ici improve of minority and economically disadvantaged children and to attract white students to the schools,________________________________ use the four-vear-old program as a means to meet the needs of disadvantaged students and desegregate schools that are difficult to desegregate, L8 A long-range (four-year-old) plan will address demographic, instructional, and structuiil needs. LRSD will conlinuejg Goal *1 - Implement integrated educational programs drat will ensure that all students grow academically, socially and emotionally with emphasis on basic skills and academic enrichment while closing disparities in \" - ......... .wa .a arm ana._ I t..i_ ___ .j_:iww.ai/an cniHantc u/ill rl^mnnciraM dav tni achievement. Goal #2 - Develop and maintain a staff that is well-trained and motivated. Goal #3 - The Little Rock School Board, administration. sUff, and students will demonstrate in their day to day behavior that they accept each diversity among students, staff and the community as resources that are necessary to fully support our in all phases of school activities and operations. -mincu aiMj iiiuuvaicu. irj buuw ixwgu uu..uu. -------------------------------------------- - - . j .i._, he comuiuniry as a valued resource upon which our community and nation can draw as we prepare for the 21st Century. Goal #4 - Solicit and secure financial and other schools, including our desegregation plan. Goal 5 - Provide a safe and orderiy climate that is conducive to learning for all students. Goal #6 - Ensure that equity occurs The District will implement the Four-Year.Old Program by the 1994-95 school year according to the provisions of a long-tinge implemenulion plan developed for additional four-year^ild classes and approved by the Court (720 seats). L7. LIO, L17. 18, 19 $2,082,112.79 $204,721.39 1st Qtr Expend: Ind Qtr Expend: $204,721.39 3rd Qtr Expend: 4th Qtr Expend: FTE 20.50 [ Related Function Codes: ] 02, 1 JProgram Seq f: 02 Program Name: Four-Year Old Program Program Code: Program Goal\nPlan RefereiKe Page Number LI7 L17 L17 L17 L17 L17 LI7 LRSD FY 95-96 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram To implement the Four-Year-Old Program in selective schools. (To meet the needs of disadvantaged students\nto improve racial balance in schools that are difficult to desegregate.) Objectives Strategies 2. Recruit teachers and aides as needed. 3. Obtain curriculum materials, supplies, and furniture as needed. 4. Train teachers and aides in the implementation of E.C.E. curriculum.) 5. Familiarize parents with Four-Year Old Program. 2 1 A. Interview interested teachers and aides as needed. Teachers and aides hired for every classroom. 3.1 A. Page: 2 Revision Date\nNovember 6, 1995 Complete and send orders to vendors. Materials, supplies and equipment available in classrooms. 4.1 Conduct orientation and inservices. A. B. C. Principals training Teachers training Instructional Aides training 02, 2 Secondary Leader: Beginning Date Completion Date Pat Price Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 06/30/96 08/18/95 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 09/22/95 06/30/96 25% 25% 25% 06/30/96 Supervisors, Human Resources Director, Principals Supervisors. Human Resources Director. Principals (Purchasing Dept. Supervisors) Principals Supervisors Supv/Staff Dev Supv/Staff Dev Classroom teachers 2. (A list of qualified applicants.) 2.1 A list of qualified applicants. (Employment of teachers and aides for new and open positions.) 3. (Confirmation of purchase orders.) 3.1 Materials available 4. (Documentation of inservice evaluations.) 4.1 Agenda (Documentation of inservice evaluations) 5. (Documentation of meetings and evaluations.)Page: 3 Program Seq f: 02 Revision Date: November 6. 1995 Program Name: Four-Year Old Program Program Code: Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Pat Price Program Goal: To implement (he Four-Year-Old Program in selective schools. (To meet the needs of disadvantaged students\nto improve racial balance in schools that are difficult to desegregate.) Plan RefereiKC Page Number L17 L17 L18 L18 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 6. Evaluate effectiveness of Four-Year Old Program. 5.1 Conduct parent orientation meeting and parent conference. A. Parent orientation 5.2 IfKlude four-year old children in Master Schedule students receive services of counselors, music teachers, school nurses, librarians, physical education and art teachers. A. Master schedule reflects services children received. 5.3 Ensure key experiences occurring in the classroom. A. Twenty-one classroom visitations 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 08/16/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 25% 06/30/96 09/30/95 06/30/96 25% 06/30/96 Classroom teachers Principals Principals Classroom Teachers Supervisors 5.1 Number of parents attending Parent/Teachcr Conferences 5.2 Master schedules 5.3 Curriculum checklist (Principals Classroom Teachers Supervisors Planning. Research, and Evaluation, Assoc. Supt.) 6. (Annual review of assessment data beginning at the end of the kindergarten year of each child participating in the program. EPSF Post Assessments) (Comparisons of the progress of children who did and did not participate in the program.) (Standardize achievement tests will be given to each child at the end of the third grade level. These tests will provide data indicating the success of the Early Childhood Program as an intervention strategy.) 02, 3Program Seq 02 Program Name: Four-Year Old Program Program Code: Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Program Goal: To implement the Four-Year-Old Program in selective schools. (To meet the needs of disadvantaged students\nto improve racial balance in schools that are difftcult to desegregate.) Page: 4 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Pat Price Plan Reference Page Number Llg LIS LIS Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 6.1 Administer appropriate evaluation to four-year- olds. 6.1 (Maintaining portfolio assessments on four-year- olds.) A.' Portfolio began on all children 6.2 Analyze student assessment test data and prepare report for LRSD Board of Directors. A. Began analyzing student assessment data 6.3 Utilize results for program improvement. A. Results of assessment \u0026amp; parent surveys were utilized to make program improvements. 07/01/95 07/01/95 08/21/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 06/30/96 25% 06/30/96 25% 06/30/96 25% Classroom teachers (Classroom teachers) Assoc Supt Supervisor Planning, Evaluation, and Testing (Assoc Supt Supervisor) 6:1 Evaluation results 6.1 (Documentation of portfolios recording the work which children do and what they know.) 6.2 Evaluation report 6.3 (Areas targeted for improvement.) 7. Support the continued work of the LRSD Early Childhood Task Force as a valuable avenue for parent, teacher, and community input. 07/01/95 06/30/96 7,1 Conduct monthly Task Force meetings A. Task Force formed and meetings scheduled 02, 4 07/01/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 25%LRSD FY 95-96 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Page: 5 Program Seq #: 02 Revision Dale: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Four-Year Old Program Program Code: Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Pat Price Program Goal: To combine the efforts of the LRSD. PC.SSD. NLR.SD, Head Start and other entities to provide quality early childhood experiences to as many disadvantaged students in the city of Little Rock. L19 LI9 L19 Plan Reference Page Number LI9 L19 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 2. To develop a plan for planning a city-wide early childhood program. 3. To initiate the planning for the implementation of a city wide early childhood program. 1.4 To receive a letter of support from each agency desiring to participate. 2.1 To establish planning procedures and identify key committees and chairpersons needed for the planning process. 2.2 To identify appropriate additional representatives from each participating agency for each committee. 2.3 To delineate the goals to be addressed and the tasks to be accomplished by each committee, including appropriate timelines to be met. 3.1 To conduct periodic meetings to review progress of each committee. 3.2 To identify resources needed by identified by each committee, including monetary. 02, 5 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 Key representatives from each agency Key representatives from each agency Key represenutives from each agency Key representatives from each agency Key representatives from each agency Assoc Supt for Educational Programs Assoc Supt for Educational Programs Assoc Supt for Educational Programs File record letters Structured plan for planning on file. Record of committee members Record of committee members Minutes of meetings Identification of committee Page: 6 Program Seq f: 02 Revision Dale: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Four-Year Old Program Program Code: Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Pat Price Program Goal: To combine the efforts of the L.R.S.D.. P.C.S.S.D., N.L.R.S.D., Head Stan and other entities to provide quality early childhood experiences to as many disadvantaged students in the city of Little Rock. L19 LI9 Plan RefereiKe Page Number L7 (N) LIO(N) LIO(N) LIO(N) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3.3 To review the first draft of the comprehensive plan and to make recommendations for refinement. 3.4 To submit the final draft for approval to all participant Boards of Directors (where applicable). 07/01/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 06/30/96 Assoc Supt for Educational Programs Assoc Supt for Educational Programs Submission of first draft Draft submitted to Board 1. (To collaborate with HIPPY. P.C.S.S.C.. N.L.R.S.D., Head Start, and other entities in order to fulfill the district's expecutions for a quality Early Childhood Education Program.) (N) I.l (To establish a schedule of regular meetings of representatives of the various entities.) (N) 1.2 (Supervisors meet to discuss individual program needs and to determine if resources can be shared.XN) A. Group met to di.scuss individual program needs and if resources could be shared. 1.3 (To plan joint inservices for administrators, teachers arxl instructional assistants.)(N) 02. 6 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 06/30/96 25% 06/30/96 (LRSD Supervisors and PCSSD/NLRSD and Headstart Supervisors of ECE programs) (LRSD Supervisors and PCSSD/NLRSD and Headstart Supervisors of ECE programs) (LRSD Supervisors and PCSSD/NLRSD and Headstart Supervisors of ECE programs) 1.1 (Schedule and minutes of all meetings) 1.2 (Roster of participants and minutes of meetings) 1.3 (Roster of participants and evaluations of inservices)Page: 7 Program Seq f: 02 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Four-Year OW Program Program Code: Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Pat Price Program Goal: To combine the efforts of the L.R.S.D.. P.C.S.S.D.. N.L.R.S.D.. Head Start and other entities to provide quality early childhood experiences to as many disadvantaged students in the city of Little Rock. Plan Reference Page Number LIO(N) L1O (N) L11 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria A. Planning for joint inservices for administrators, teachers and instructional aides. 1.4 (To plan joint parent involvement activkies-XN) A. Planning for joint parent involvement activities. 1.5 (To use a student referral system allowing parents on a waiting list to know about vacanc i es.)(N) A. Referrals will be made between agenc i es 1.6 A representative from the Little Rock School Oistrict Student Assignment Office will meet each year with parents from both programs to review the kirxlergarten assignment process. The anrxjal sessions on kindergarten registration will also be used to provide information on magnet school opportunities. A. Parent recruiter coordinators from the student assignment office did presentations for various groups. 02, 7 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 25% 06/30/96 25X 06/30/96 25X 06/30/96 07/29/95 (LRSD Supervisors and PCSSD/NLRSD and Headstart St^rvisors of ECE programs) (LRSD Supervisors and PCSSO/KLRSD and Headstart Supervisors of ECE programs) 1.4 (Roster of participants and evaluations of inservices) 1.5 (List of vacancies each entity has.) Page: 8 Program Seq *: 02 Revision Date: November 6. 1995 Program Name: Four-Year Old Program Program Code: Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Pat Price Program Goal: To combine (he efforts of the L.R.S.D., P.C.S.S.D., N.L.R.S.D., Head Start and other entities to provide quality early childhood experiences to as many disadvantaged students in the city of Little Rock. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Comi^etion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria L11 1.7 Beginning in the 1990-91 school year, a list will be compiled of all graduates from the three early childhood programs. These students will be identified in the Little Rock School District mainframe computer system according to their respective programs. A. Rock. List received from city of Little 07/01/95 25X 02, 8 1.7 At the end of each year for grades K-3, these students will be monitored on the basis of standardized tests, criter ion-reference tests, EPSF screening, or any other academic measures that ere available and applicable. The entities Mill review these results on an annual basis, prior to the beginning of the fol lowing school year, and make prograwnatic changes, individualIv and collectively, as needed. These students will be compared to a control group in order to isolate the effectiveness and/or deficiencies of the various early childhood programs.Program Seq f: 03 Program Name: Academic Support Program Program Code: 10 Program Description: District Goal Support: Program Goal: Plan References: Program Budget: YTD Expeiwlitures: Related Function Codes: LRSD FY 95-96 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Primary Leader: Secondary Leader: Page: 1 Revision Date: Adams/Parker/Glasgow November 6, 1995 except Metropolitan Nam, and Location of Academic Support Programs The name of all district remediation programs will be Academic Support Programs^ All school Vocational-Technical Education Center. Purpose - Ilie purpose of the Academic Support Program is Io provide support for participating students in grades one through twelve in me areas ol reading, languag vocational Technical Mucmm^C_^^^ certified reading specialists additional classes, and labs. Scope and Content - The Academic Support Program offers a variety of options to the individual schools for providing .cce^^taad annual smdent assessment. Multiple criteria, including student grades, teacher recommendations, and smdent records ate used to select smdents from the eligible population to participate tn the Academic Suppo mathematics. The program classrooms, experiences Program. (1) Implement integrated educational programs that will ensure (2) Develop and maintain a suff that is well-trained and motivated. that all studettls grow academically, socially and emotionally with emphasis on basic and academic enrichment while closing disparities in achievement. LZCVCIup dllM iiiaiiiwaiaa a jwiii wim* aw ------------------------------------ , (3) Solicit and secure financial and other resources that are necessary to fully support our schools, including our desegregation plan. (4) Provide a safe and orderly climate that is conducive to learning for all students. S :ni s=\ndl d=te m their day Io day behavior that they accept each individual as a valued contributor to society and view culnital diversity among students, staff and the community as a valued resource upon which our community can draw as we prepare for the 21 st Century. (6) Ensure that equity occurs in all phases of school activities and operations. The goal of the Academic Support Program is Io provide equilable language arts and mathemalics learning eaperiences for all students in the mainstream sening by supporting them with the instructional and technical assistance needed to reduce the learning disparity. LP 1-20 $1,592,924.90 $132,025.63 I 1st Qtr Expend: 2nd Qtr Expend: $132,025.63 3rd Qtr Expend: 4th Qtr Expend: FTE 75.60 03, 1Program Seq f: 03 Program Name: Academic Support Program Program Code: Program Goal: Plan Reference Page Number March 19, 1993 Revised Academic Support Program P I p4.13 LRSD FY 95-96 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Primary Leader: Henry Williams Secondary Leader: Page: 2 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Adams/Parker/Glasgow The goal of the Academic Support Program is to provide equitable language arts and mathematics learning experiences for all students in the mainstreamed setting by supporting them with the instructional and technical assistaiKe needed to reduce the learning disparity. Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1. To identify and serve students who are at-risk in language arts arul mathematics. 1.1 Explain the Academic Support Program options to local school administrators. A. Language Arts Plus and Math Plus and traditional in-class support. 1.2 Provide an overview of how all the Individual Academic Support Progranu will be coordinated for continuity of services to children and efficient use of resources. -All schools will implement the Board-approved uniform curriculum. 03, 2 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/31/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 06/30/96 09/29/95 06/30/96 Local school teams Associate Supt. for Curriculum Associate Supt. for Curriculum, Director of Federal Programs, Curriculum Supervisors 1. (Print-out of eligible students is provided to local school teams. Uniform District criteria are used (Stanford 8 cutoff score and multiple criteria) to identify targeted students.) 1.1 (Schedule of meeting.) 1.2 (Observation reports and staff development activities records are on file.)Page: 3 Program Seq #: 03 Revision Date: November 6. 1995 Program Name: Academic Support Program Program Code: Primary Leader: Henry Williams Secondary Leader: Adams/Parker/Glasgow Program Goal: The goal of the Academic Support Program is to provide equitable language arts and mathematics learning experiences for all students in the mainstreamed setting by supporting them with the instructional and technical assistance needed to reduce the learning disparity. Plan Reference Page Nimber Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria p7.10 The established critical attributes of the Academic Support Program will be evident in each school. The revised curriculum (K-I2) has been sequentially developed and the objectives have been correlated to the skills in Arkansas Minimum Performance Test, Stanford Achievement Test-Eighth Edition, and existing computer-assisted instructional software. Tb provide for continuous improvement of teachers, records will be maintained on staff development activities. -New staff members will be targeted for appropriate staff development activities as well as participation in the districts \"New Teacher Initiative.\" A. Principals Meeting 07/17/95 08/04/95 B. Title I Specialists Meeting 08/15/95 08/15/95 p 13 p 11.13 1.3 Select the local schools appropriate Academic Support Program. (Indirect/direct/extended services) 1.4 Identify students selected for participation in each program by school/grade level. A. Students identified and selected. 03, 3 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 06/30/96 75% Local school administrators Local school teams 1.3 (Selection on File at buildinglevel and in office of Director of Federal Programs.) 1.4 (Print-out of eligible students is provided tn local school teams. Uniform District criteria are used (Stanford 8 cutoff score and multiple criteria) to identify targeted students.) JPage: 4 Program Seq \u0026gt;: 03 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Academic Support Program Program Code: Primary Leader: Henry Williams Secondary Leader: Adams/Parker/Glasgow Program Goal: The goal of the Academic Support Program is to provide equitable language arts and mathematics learning experiences for all students in the mainstreamed setting by supporting them with the instructional and technical assistance needed to reduce the learning disparity. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Comfrfetion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria P 12.13 p 12,13 p 13 1.5 Select staff (Identify by position) responsible for delivering Academic Support Program. A. Staff selected for 1995'96 school year. 1.6 Schedule the academic teams staff. A. Schedules on file at Office of Federal Programs B. Schedules posted in classroom 1.7 Implement selected school options at local level. A. Program options implemented 03, 4 07/01/95 08/01/95 07/01/95 08/22/95 08/22/95 08/21/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 09/29/95 06/30/96 75% 75% 06/30/96 06/30/96 Principal PriiKipal Principal and staff 1.5 (Staff assignments are determined at the building level and assignments filed at the Office of Federal Programs.) 1.6 (Schedules are developed listing team's contact time, number of students served, and other variables associated with the teams responsibilities.) 1.7 (Schedules of targeted students reflect implementation of the selected school option(s).)Program Seq #: 03 Program Name: Academic Support Program Program Code: Primary Leader\nHenry Williams SecoiMlary Leader: Program Goal: Plan Reference Page Number P 7.8,20 P 1 p 14 pl4 Page: 5 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Adams/Parker/Glasgow The goal of the Academic Support Program is to provide equitable language arts and mathematics learning experiences for all students in the mainstreamed setting by supporting them with the instructional and technical assistance needed to reduce the learning disparity. Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Comfrfetion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 2. To prescribe a personalized intervention plan for eligible students. 2. (To prescribe a personal education plan for targeted students.) 1.8 Utilize resources invested in PAL remediation approach by reallocating staff positions, computer hardware, software programs, and other equipment and materials toward the new approach to remediation. 2.1 Cluster schools and develop a staff development schedule for curriculum clusters. 2.2 Begin training staff responsible for delivering each Academic Support Program. 03, 5 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 (Principal. Coordinator of Media Services. Director of Federal Programs, and Curriculum Supervisors) Principal and staff Directors of Staff Development and Reading\nSupervisors of Language Arts and Mathematics Directors of Staff Development and Reading: Supervisors of Language Arts, Mathematics and IRC Specialists, Director of Federal Programs 1.8 (Technology Department's inventory and schedules of staffing reflect reallocations of resources.) 2. (Personal education plans of targeted students reflect implementation of the selected school opiion(s).) 2.1 (Staff development schedule on file.) 2.2 (Staff training for participants will include program administration (student selection process, recordkeeping. progress reports) instructional strategies, parental involvement, and others.)Page: 6 Program Seq #\n03 Revision Date: Program Name: November 6, 1995 Program Code: Program Goal\nPlan Reference Page Number Academic Support Program Primary Leader: Henry Williams Secondary Leader: Adams/Parker/Glasgow The goal of Ihe Academic Suppon Program is lo provide eqoilable language arts and madiemalics learning experiences for all students in the mainstreamed selling by supporting them with the instructional and technical accictunr^ r/\\ re1llAA ikaa lAmmanau ajMOva assistarKC needed to reduce (he learning disparity. Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria A. Workshops -Principal's meeting 08/04/95 08/04/95 p 14 -Principals meeting Title I Specialist Inservice Title 1 Specialist Inservice -Preschool Secondary Math Teachers -Math Plus Inservice Math Plus Inservice -Secondary Math Council 2.3 Monitor the implementation of above. A. On site visits made to elementary and secondary schools by staff 2.3 (Monitor the implementation of the Academic Support Program options. These programs may vary from year-to-year.) 2.4 Monitor instruction and learning in Academic Support Program settings on a regular basis and observe to determine: -Teachers involving students in a variety of classroom activities (hat address learning styles and cultural diversity. 03, 6 08/15/95 09/11/95 08/14/95 09/19/95 09/20/95 09/12/95 07/01/95 08/22/95 07/01/95 08/15/95 09/11/95 08/14/95 09/19/95 09/20/95 09/12/95 06/30/96 20% 06/30/96 Principals, districtwide staff development team, and computer specialists Principals 2.3 (School visits/observations are made to provide feedback (oral/wrillen) to trained staff.) Teacher observations and evaluations on record.Page: 7 Program Seq 9: 03 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Academic Support Program Program Code: Primary Leader: Henry Williams Secondary Leader: Adams/Parker/Glasgow Program Goal: The goal of the Academic Support Program is to provide equitable language arts and mathematics learning experiences for all students in the mainstreamed setting by supporting them with the instructional and technical assistance needed to reduce the learning disparity. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria p 7.9.10.19 -Teachers selecting methods and strategies that capitalize on students interests and experiences. -Teachers demonstrating creativity and resourcefulness tn delivering instruction. -Teachers utilizing effective classroom strategies, such as tutors, small-group Instruction, and extended day/week programs, to maintain the gains students have made. -Teachers interacting with students in a caring manner. -Teachers recording of students data that shows increased student achievement and social skills (letter and citizenship grades, standardized test scores, attendance). p7,15 2.5 Provide technical assistance and maintenance workshops as needed in the above staff development areas. A. Technical assistance has been provided to elementary arxl secondary schools. B. Title I Specialist Inservice C. Title I Specialist Inservice 03, 7 07/01/95 08/22/95 09/11/95 09/19/95 00/30/96 15% 09/11/95 09/19/95 Principals, districtwide staff development team, and computer specialists, Office of Fed. Programs (Principals, districtwide staff development team, curriculum supervisors, IRC specialists) 2.4 (Requests for technical assistance are documented and evaluated. Feedback related to improvement or change is recorded.)Page: 8 Program Seq #: 03 Revision Date: November 6. 1995 Ih-ogram Name: Academic Support Program Program Code: Primary Leader: Henry Williams Secondary Leader: Adams/Parker/Glasgow Program Goal: The goal of the Academic Support Program is to provide equitable language arts and mathemalics learning experiences for all students in the mainstreamed setting by supporting them with the instructional and technical assistance needed to reduce the learning disparity. Plan Reference Page Number p 7,10,1$ p 10,15 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 2.6 Schedule school based meetings to assess program effectiveness. 07/01/95 06/30/96 Principal 2.5 (Records of dates of meetings and participants, minutes of meetings, and issues related to program effectiveness are maintained.) 3. To reduce or eliminate pull-out academic support programs. 3.1 Collect appropriate data for end of school program evaluation, including pre and post staitdardized test scores, student grades and atlendaiKe, samples of student work, and parent/tcacher/student recommendations. 3.2 Analyze the above data to evaluate program effectiveness in meeting its particular programmatic goals and objectives of remediating student achievement and contributing to the overall reduction of disparity between Mack and white students. 03, 8 07/01/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 06/30/96 Principal and staff\nDir. of Federal Programs Associate Supt. for Curriculum, Assistant Supts., Curriculum Supervisors, and Principals, Office of Fed. Programs 3.1 (Individual student folders that include a systematic collection of student work, pre and post standardized lest scores, grades, and recommendations to provide individual/group/school progress are mainuined for continuous student and program progress.) 3.2 Academic Support Programs will be successfully operating in all district schools as evidenced by: -Increased student achievement. Improvement on standardized test scores. Increased numbers of students moving to the next quartile. Increased number of students moving above the 50(h percentile.Page: 9 Program Seq f: 03 Revision Date: November 6. 1995 Program Name: Academic Support Program Program Code: Primary Leader: Henry Williams Secondary Leader: Adams/Parker/Glasgow Program Goal: The goal of the Academic Suppon Program is to provide equitable language arts and mathematics learning experiences for ail students in the mainstreamed setting by supporting them with the instructional and technical assistance needed to reduce the learning disparity. pis P5 Plan Reference Page Nianber P 1.20 P9 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3.3 Identify modification for (be Academic Support Program for 1995-96. A. Math Plus initiated in regular math, pre-algebra, algebra 3.4 Support and extend learning opportunities for students by making available to targeted students before-school, at lunch, after-school, ar*d periodic exteiwled weeks computer lab instruction. 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 75% 06/30/96 4. To provide parents the knowledge and skills needed to promote the education of their children at home and at school. 07/01/95 06/30/96 Associate Supt. for Curriculum, Assistant Supts., Curriculum Supervisors, PritKipals and Office of Federal Programs Director of Federal Programs, Principals (Principal and staff. Director of Federal Programs. Curriculum Supervisors) 3.3 (The 1995-96 school year will reflect modifications.) 3.4 (Schedules will reflect additional instructional services.) 4. Parental involvement will show an increase in the numbers of parents attending parent confereiKes and parent training sessions and visiting schools. 4.1 Assist parents in obtaining the knowledge and skills needed to promote the education of their children at home and at school through: providing timely information regarding students' achievement and behavior. -involving them in informative and effective conferences concerning their childs education, -involving parents as partners in their childs educational process. 07/01/95 06/30/96 (Principal and staff. Director of Federal Programs, Curriculum Supervisors) 4.1 (Records of parental involvement activities on file.) 03, 9Program Seq #: 03 Program Name: Academic Support Program Program Code: Primary Leader: Henry Williams Secondary Leader: Page: 10 Revision Date: November 6. 1995 Adams/Parker/Glasgow Program Goal: The goal of the Academic Support Program is to provide equitable language arts and mathematics learning experiences for all students in the mainstreamed setting by supporting them with the instructional and technical assistance needed to reduce the learning disparity. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria A. Provided parent/teacher support at schools\ncortducted parent meetings B. Parent Involvement meetings with Key Facilitators and/or Executive Council C. Title I Parent Kick-Off (200) 07/05/95 07/12/95 09/16/95 20% 10% 09/16/95 03, 10Program Seq 04 Program Name: Multicultural Curriculum Program Code: 12 Primary Leader: LRSD FY 95-96 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Page: Revision Date: November 6. 1995 Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Marie McNeal I Program Description: 1. The Multiculhiral Curriculum Program is designed to provide equity and excellence in all curricular and program areas in the Little Rock School District. (6) The program is further designed to reduce the disparity that exists between black and white students in academic performances and the low representation of black students in advanced placement courses as well as in special activities and programs. (1.6) 2. In order to achieve the components klentified in the Multicultural Curriculum Program, multicultural curriculum guides will be used in all schools. Teachers will receive extensive and ongoing staff development in the use of the guides as well as training in the implementation of strategies, techniques, and activities to use to ensure that instruction meets the cultural, academic and social needs of all children. (1,3,6) To supplement existing instructional materials focusing on cultural diversity from a multicultural perspective materials will be purchased for use in all schools and programs. 3. The participants in the Multicultural Program consists of all teachers, K-12. in core area subjects in addition to music and art teachers. Students of all social, cultural, and ethnic backgrounds will be affected the greatest by activities outlined in the Multiculniral Curriculum Program. 4. Smdents will be provided oopoitunities to develop better self-esteem, 5. Students will have opportunities to examine the artistic, musical, scientific, literary, social and political accomplishments of many ethnic groups. District Goal Support: Goal No. I. Implement integrated educational programs that will ensure that all students grow academically, socially and emotionally with emphasis on basic skills and academic enrichment while closing disparities in achievement. Goal No. 6. Ensure that equity occurs in all phases of school activities and operations. Goal No. 2. Develop and maintain a staff that is well-trained and motivated. Goal No. 4. Solicit and secure finarKial and other resources that are necessary to fully support our schools, including our desegregation plan. Goal No. 3. The Little Rock School Board, administration, staff, and students will demonstrate in their day to day behavior that they accept each individual as a valued contributor to society and view cultural diversity among studenu. staff and the conununity as a valued resource upon which our community and nation can draw as we prepare for the 2Ist Century. Program Goal\nTo ensure educational equity in the elementary and secondary curriculum and program areas. (Applies to entire document except for page 76. objectives 1. 2, 3. 4.) To collaborate with the PCSSD and the NLRSD to promote multicultural activities and curriculum development. (Applies only to page 76. objectives 1, 2, 3, 4.) E Plan References: L66 - 80 ] FY Program Budget: $123,868.60 YTD Expenditures: $11,354.76 I 1st Qtr Expend: 2nd Qtr Expend: $11,354.76 3rd Qtr Expend: 4th Qtr Expend: FTE 5 Related Function Codes: 04, 1 1r LRSD FY 95-96 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Page: 2 Program Seq iC: 04 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Multicultural Curriculum Program Code: 12 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Marie McNeal Program Goal\nTo ensure educational equity in the elementary and secondary curriculum and program areas. (Applies to entire document except for page 76, objectives 1, 2, 3. 4.) To collaborate with the PCSSD and the NLRSD (o promote multicultural activities and curriculum development. (Applies only to page 76, objectives 1. 2, 3. 4.) L 66 Plan RefereiKe Page Number L66 L66 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1. To provide teacher learning opportunities through formal course training 1.1 Contact local colleges and universities to obtain information on proposed course offerings related to ethnic studies for the summer and fall, 1991 1.1 (LRSD will receive announcements from local colleges/universities on proposed multicultural courses) A. Original obligation completed. Learning opportunities disseminated as received. 1.2 Receive and advertise course offerings to all certified staff, including opportunities for tuition reimbursement and/or salary credit A. Original obligation completed. Learning opportunities disseminated as received. 04, 2 (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (Director of Staff Development. Subject Area Supervisors. Principals) Assoc Supt.-Educ. Programs Dean of Grad. Sch. Academic Deans (Director of Staff Development) (Supervisor of Social Studies) Assoc Supt Educ Programs Office of Human Resources 1. (Multicultural strategies will be implemented in schools as assessed by administration during classroom observations and teacher conferences) l.I List of college offerings 1.1 (The number of teachers who have received multicultural training will increase.) 1.2 Copy of information providedPage: 3 Program Seq f\n04 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Multicultural Curriculum Program Code: 12 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Marie McNeal Program Goal: To ensure educational equity in the elemenury and secondary curriculum and program areas. (Applies to entire document except for page 76, objectives I. 2. 3, 4.) To collaborate with the PCSSD and the NLRSD to promote multicultural activities and curriculum development. (Applies only to page 76. objectives 1. 2. 3. 4.) L66 Plan Reference Page Number L66 L66 L66 L66 L 66 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1.3 Identify participants in summer and fall courses (07/01/95) (06/30/96) Employees (Director of Human Resources) 1.3 Copy of academic course completion on tile in Personnel office (Office of Human Resources) 2. To develop a district-wide multicultural audio/visual resource catalogue 2. (To maintain district-wide multicultural audio/visual resource catalogue) 2.1 Review and catalogue present audio/visual materials related to multicultural curriculum 2.2 Purchase additional audio/visual materials from the 1988-89 budget 2.3 Identify and catalogue other resources for multicultural audio/visual maleriab, i.e., AR Dept of Education, LR Public Library, AR Library Commission 2.4 Revise, print and distribute multicultural audio/visual resource catalogue for the LRSD 04, 3 (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (Subject area supervisors) Supv of Media Services (Subject area supervisors) Supv of Media Services (Subject area supervisors, principals) Supv of Media Services Superv of Media Services 2. (Multicultural resources will be used for classroom instruction) 2.1 Current catalogue listing 2.1 (Copies of updated multicultural audio/visual catalogue will be distributed) 2.1 (Multicultural materials will be checked out arxl used by instructional staff in the schools) 2.2 Requisition material 2.2 (Materials ordered, received, and catalogued for distribution/use) 2.3 2.4 2.4 Completed catalogue Distribution of catalogue (Multicultural materials will be checked out by schools)Page: 4 I Program Seq f: 04 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Multicultural Curriculum Program Code: 12 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Marie McNeal Program Goal: To ensure educational equity in the elementary and secondary curriculum and program areas. (Applies to entire document except for page 76. objectives I, 2. 3, 4.) To collaborate with the PCSSD and the NLRSD to promote multicultural activities and curriculum development. (Applies only to page 76. objectives 1. 2. 3. 4.) L66 Plan RefererKe Page Number L 67 L67 L67 L67 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 2.5 Place initial supi^emental order for muHicuttural audio/visual materials from the 1989- 90 budget (07/01/95) (06/30/96) Media Specialists 2.5 Requisitions submitted 2.5 (Materials are available for check-out/use) 3. To plan and implement Ihe Instructional Materials Fair (Mullicuilural) 3. (To supply information about multicultural materials for purchase lo teachers, parents atKl the community) 3.1 Involve a team of parents, community resources, and teachers in detailed planning for the Fair-specific dales, time, place and format-to be held as a component of 1988-89 pre-school confereiKe 3.1 (To plan and implement the Instructional Multicultural Materials Fair for current term) A. Tri-District meeting held lo plan Multicultural Materials Fair. Fair date set for October 26. 1995. 3.2 Identify lutional and local vendors of multicultural instructional materials 3.3 Establish pre-school confereiKe dales and extend invitation to vendors 3.3 (Establish date for Fair) A. Date Established - October 26. 1995. 04, 4 (07/01/95) (07/01/95) 07/13/95 07/01/95 (07/01/95) (07/01/95) 07/13/95 07/01/95 (06/30/96) (06/30/96) 07/13/95 09/30/95 (06/30/96) (06/30/96) 07/13/95 09/30/95 (Assoc Supt for Educational Programs) (Supv of Media Services) Assoc Supt for Educational Programs (Supv of Media Services) Assoc Supt for Educational Programs Executive Staff Assoc Supt for Educational Programs 3. (Multicultural materials will he used by instructional staff in all schools) 3. (Evaluate the effectiveness of the Multicultural Fair) 3.1 Implementation Plan 3.1 (Involved input from parents, community, and teachers) 3.2 Completion ol mailing list 3.2 (Major suppliers of multicuftural materials will be invited to exhibit al the Fair) 3.3 Conference scheduled 3.3 (Fair date placed on District master calendar) Program Seq #: 04 Page: 5 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Muiticulniral Curriculum Program Code: 12 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Marie McNeal Program Goal\nTo ensure educational equity in the elementary and secondary curriculum and program areas. (Applies to entire document except for page 76. objectives I. 2, 3, 4.) To collaborate with the PCSSD and the NLRSD to promote multiculniral activities and curriculum development. (Applies only to page 76, objectives 1.2, 3, 4.) L67 L67 Plan RefereiKe Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria L67 L67 L68 L68 L68 L 68 3.4 Confirm Fair participants 3.S Acquaint principals and central office staff with iMans and Fair relationship to desegregation efforts A. Fair date listed on LRSD calendar. 3.6 Conduct media campaign for Fair to staff and parents 3.7 Host tri-district \"Instructional Materials Fair\" 3.7 (Host the Multiculniral Fair rotating the site among the three districts) 4.1 Revise Board policy for textbook adoption 4.2 Identify an ad hoc committee to review criteria presently being used in LRSD and other districts for textbook adoptions (10 members) 4.3 Conduct staff development training on avoiding sex and race bias and stereotyping in textbooks 4.3 (Textbooks on the approved Arkansas State Department of Education's textbook list are free of sex/race bias) 4.4 Submit revised policy and criteria to the Board of Directors for first reading 04, 5 07/01/95 (07/01/95) 07/13/95 (07/01/95) (07-01-95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) 35'' 06/30/96 (06/30/96) 07/28/95 (06/30/96) (6/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) Supv of Media Services Assoc Supt for Deseg and Schoob Supv of Media Services, Dir of Communications Assoc Supt of Educational Programs working with committee Assoc Supt for Educational Programs Assoc Supt for Educational Programs Assoc Supt for Educational Programs (Arkansas State Dept, of Education) Superintendent Assoc Supt for Ed Progs 3.4 3.4 3.S 3.5 ConTirmation (List of participating vendors) Staff agenda (Staff can relate Fair to the District's desegregation efforts) 3.6 Publicity 3.6 (Fair is advertised to the public) 3.7 3.7 4.1 4.2 Validate Fair participation (Materials ordered/purchased) Approved criteria Roster of committee members 4.3 Schedule of meeting and agenda 4.3 (Textbooks selected will be free of sex/race bias) 4.4 Board agenda Page: 6 Program Seq #: 04 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Multicultural Curriculum Program Code: 12 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Marie McNeal Program Goal: To ensure educational equity in the elementary and secondary curriculum and program areas. (Applies to entire document except for page 76. objectives 1. 2, 3. 4.) To collaborate with the PCSSD and the NLRSD to promote multicultural activities and curriculum development. (Applies only to page 76, objectives 1, 2, 3, 4.) L 68 L68 Plan Reference Page Number L68 L69 L69 L69 L69 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 4.5 Adopt policy on textbooks 4.6 Utilize a local consultant to train staff on \"Avoiding Sex and Race Stereotyping in Textbooks\" 4.7 Select and recommend Io Board for adoption of textbooks (elementary and secondary) based on criteria for adoption (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) LRSD Board of Directors Assoc Supt for Educational Programs (Curriculum Supervisors) Assoc Supt for Educational Programs (Curriculum Specialists) 4.5 4.6 4.6 Board agenda Monitoring (Textbooks are free of sex/race stereotypes) 4.7 Board approval 4.7 (Criteria checklist was used for textbook selection) 5. To develop and implement a multicultural curriculum for pre-klndergarlen through grade 6 5. (To implement the LRSD curriculum. K-6. which is multicultural) 5.1 Plan and host at least three (3) public meetings to receive suggestions from patrons on areas to be iiKluded in a multicultural curriculum 5.2 Identify and retain the services of a national expert in multicultural curriculum development (lead consultant for two (2) year contract). 5.3 In cooperation with the lead consultant, the Division of Educational Programs will issue a detailed curriculum development timeline for the year, including a checklist for task completion 04, 6 (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (Principals. Teachers, Asst. Supts., Curriculum Supervisors) Assoc Supt for Educ Prog Assoc Supt for Desegregation Assoc Supt for Educatioital Programs Lead Consultant Assoc Supt for Educational Programs 5. (Observation of curriculum implementation during classroom visits/teacher conferences) 5. (Improvement in student performance and assessment of attitude regarding learning) 5.1 5.2 the Transcript of suggestions Contractual commitment for 1988-89 school year (Dr. James A. Banks was used) 5.3 Timeline/checklist (Timeline included in this document 5.5 5.17)Page: 7 Program Seq 04 Revision Dale: November 6. 1995 Program Name: Multicultural Curriculum Program Code: 12 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Marie McNeal Program Goal: To ensure educational equity in the elementary and secondary curriculum and program areas. (Applies to entire document except for page 76. objectives 1, 2, 3, 4.) To collaborate with the PCSSD and the NLRSD to promote multicultural activities and curriculum development. (Applies only to page 76. objectives 1, 2. 3. 4.) L 69 L69 L69 L 70 L70 Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 5.4 Develop expectations for members participating on multicultural curriculum committee 5.5 Identify curriculum committee members and coittract for services: 8 - Hcahh/Science 5 - Musk 14 * Reading/Language Arts 3-Art 4 - Social Studies 4 Libraries 38 5.5 (Ail core curriculum areas were involved in the development of guides) 5.5 (Curriculum areas revised were: Reading. Language Arts. Social Studies. Math, and Science) 5.6 Obtain multicultural curriculum units from models used in other cities 5.7 Develop expectations for use of local resource consultant tn multicultural curriculum development 5.8 Secure the services of six (6) local resource consultants to serve on the district wide curriculum development committee 04, 7 (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) Lead Consultant Assoc Supt for Educ Programs Assoc Supt for Educatioiul Programs Assoc Supt for Educational Programs Assoc Supt for Educational Programs Assoc Supt for Educational Programs 5,4 Expectations 5.4 (Contractual agreements with curriculum writers) 5.5 Identification of committee members 5.6 Copies of multicultural materials distributed to committee members 5.7 List of expectations 5.8 Contract services of consultants Jr Page: 8 Program Seq f: 04 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 I Isogram Name: Multicultural Curriculum Program Code: 12 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Marie McNeal Program Goal: To ensure educational equity in the elementary and secondary curriculum and program areas. (Applies to entire document except for page 76, objectives 1. 2. 3, 4.) To collaborate with the PCSSD and the NLRSD to promote multicultural activities and curriculum development. (Applies only to page 76, objectives 1, 2, 3, 4.) Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria L70 L 70 L 70 L 70 L70 5.9 Conduct inservice session on \"Methods for Developing Multicultural Teaching Strategies\" to include (a) understanding Ihe rationale, trends, and goals multicultural curriculum, (b) developing a conceptual framework for multicultural curriculum, and (c) establishing procedures for developing a multicultural curriculum A. Preschool science inservice included a component about multicultural contributors in science. 5.10 Conduct task completion monitoring as idenlifted in limeline 5.11 Operatiorulize the curriculum development limeline (monthly meetings with specific dates developed in cooperation with committee members) 5.12 Review and edit the comprehensive guides In each content area at each grade level 5.13 Type and print all guides 04, 8 (07/01/95) 08/21/95 (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (06/30/96) 08/22/95 (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) Assoc Supt for Educational Programs (Curriculum Supervisors) Div of Educational Programs (Assoc Supt for Educational Programs) Assoc Supt for Educational Programs Assoc Supt for Educatiorul Programs Assoc Supt for Educational Programs 5.9 Participants written evaluation 5.9 (Original inservice completed\nongoing inservice will be documented and evaluated by participants) 5.10 Implementation of monitoring instrument 5.11 5.12 5.13 5.13 Agenda of each meeting Implementation of guides Guides completed (Guides delivered to schools)Page: 9 Program Seq 04 Revbiion Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Multicultural Curriculum Program Code: 12 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader\nMarie McNeal Program Goal: To ensure educational equity in the elementary and secondary curriculum and program areas. (Applies to entire document except for page 76. objectives 1,2.3, 4.) To collaborate with the PCSSD and the NLRSD to promote multiculniral activities and curriculum development. (Applies only to page 76. objectives I. 2. 3. 4.) L 70 Plan Reference Page Number L70 L70 L70 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 5.14 Conduct inservice for all elementary principab and teachers A. Inservice in multicultural science curriculum at principals' institute. B. Inservice in multicultural science curriculum at preschool conference for teachers. 5.15 Involve principals and teachers in ordering multicultural materials from local building budgets\n5.16 Extend Inservice through scheduled district level regular elementary cluster meetings (reading, language arts, social studies, art, and music) 5.17 Host three (3) education meetings for parents of elementary children Io provide an overview of (he comprehensive multicultural curriculum 04, 9 (07/01/95) 07/18/95 08/21/95 (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (06/30/96) 07/18/95 08/22/95 (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) Assoc Supt for Educational Programs (Curriculum Supervisors) Assoc Supt for Educational Prog Elem Teachers I^incipals Principals Assoc Supt for Eklucational Programs Division of Educational Programs 5.14 Agenda 5.14 (Curriculum implementation) 5.14 (Inservice on revised curriculum is ongoing) 5.IS Acquisition of materials 5.15 (Instructionalmalerials representing diverse groups will be present in all schools) 5.16 (Inservice on revised curriculum is being offered through minicourses and building meetings during the 1993-94 school year) 5.17 Program and roster of participants 5.17 (Assessment of multicultural education during parent conferences) Page: 10 Program Seq f: 04 Revision Date: November 6. 1995 Program Name: Multicultural Curriculum Program Code: 12 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Marie McNeal Program Goal: Plan RefereiKe Page Number L72 L74 L74 L75 (Applies to entire document except for page 76, objectives 1. 2. 3. 4.) 10 ensure euucaiionai cquuy in uic cichkuuii\nri svwiiwai/ , . -0------------- r. ------ - t -y 1 a \\ To collaborate with the PCSSD and the NLRSD to promote multicultural activities and curriculum development, (Applies only to page 76, ob|ecttves I, z, 4. 4.j To ensure educational equity In the elementary and secondary curriculum and program Objectives 6. To develop and implement a multicultural curriculum for grades 7*12 (To implement the revised curriculum 7-12, which is multicultural) areas. Strategies 6.16 Involve principals and teachers in ordering multicultural materials from local building budgets: 6.17 Monitor the use of curriculum guides A. Curriculum Directors. Supervisors. Coordinators, and Specialisu monitor teachers' implementation of the curriculum guide. 6.18 Extend inservice through scheduled district level regular council meetings (reading, English, social studies, scieiKe, art, and music for the secondary level) 04, 10 Beginning Date Completion Dale Responsibility Evaluation Criteria (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) 07/01/95 (07/01/95) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) 25% (06/30/96) (Principals. Teachers, Asst. Supts.. Subject Area Supervisors) Assoc Supt for Educational Programs PrirKipals Area Supervisors Assoc Supt and Staff for Educational Programs 6. (Observation of curriculum implementation during classroom visits/teacher conferences) 6. (Improvement in student academic performance and assessment of attitude regarding learning) 6.16 Materials purchased 6.16 (Instructional materials representing diverse groups will be present in all secondary schools) 6.17 Schedule/Documenlation 6.17 (Observation of curriculum implementation during classroom visits and teacher conferences) 6.17 (Improvement in student achievement and attitude toward self and learning) 6.18 Agenda of meetings, roster of participants 6.18 Additional inservice will occur through minicourses and council meetings during 1993-94)Page 11 Program Seq f: 04 Revision Date: November 6. 1995 Program Name: Multicultural Curriculum Program Code: 12 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Marie McNeal Program Goal: educational equity in the elementary and secondary curriculum and program areas. (Applies to entire document except for page 76. objectives I, 2. 3. 4.) . ............................. ..... J_______ /i__:____1.. ____ It. I 1 1 A \\ To ensure tuuLdUUim mv wiwiii.iii.\n...... ----------------------r-- v--------- ... ' To collaborate with the PCSSD and the NLRSD to promote multicultural activities and curriculum development. (Applies only to page 76, objectives 1, 2. 3^4.) L75 Plan RefercrKe Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Dale Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria L76 1. To provide staff development in the area of multicultural education L 76 6.19 Host three (3) education meetings for parents of secondary children to provide an overview of the comprehensive multicultural curriculum (07/01/95) (06/30/96) Assoc. Supt. for Educational Programs (Content Area Supervisor, Principals) 07/01/95 (06/30/96) (Director of Suff Development, Subject Area Supervisors, PritKipals) 6.19 Program aiHl roster of participants 1. (Multicultural strategies will be implemented in schools as assessed by administration during classroom observations and teacher conferences) 1. (Academic achievement of students will improve as evidenced by report cards and standardized tests) 1.1 Jointly negotiate for consultants to provide inservice for the districts 1.1 (Conduct staff development in the area of multicultural education) (07/01/95) (06/30/96) LRSD Assoc. Supt for Educ Programs (Director of Staff Development) i.l 1.1 11 Contractual agreement (Roster of participants) (Multicultural strategies will be implemented in LRSD classrooms as determined by classroom observations and teacher conferences) 04, 11 iPage: 12 Program Seq 9: 04 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Multicultural Curriculum Program Code: 12 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Marie McNeal Program Goal: To ensure educational equity in the elementary and secondary curriculum and program areas. (Applies to entire document except for page 76. objectives 1. 2, 3. 4.) To collaborate with the PCSSD and the NLRSD to promote multicultural activities and curriculum development. (Applies only to page 76, objectives 1. 2. 3, 4.) L 76 Plan Reference Page Number L76 L76 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 2. To provide access lo and information about multicultural materials to teachers, parents, community 3. To provide information to staff members on the availability of graduate course work in multicultural education (07/01/95) (06/30/96) (PCSSD - Coor for Multicultural Curr Dev Dir of Library Serv LRSD - Assoc Supt for Educ Programs. Supv of Media Serv NLRSD - Coor of Instructional Materials) 2. (Teachers, parents, community will have the opportunity to attend Multicultural Materials Fair) 2.1 Share responsibility for Multicultural Materials Fair to be held annually A. Tri-District meeting held to plan Multicultural Materials Fair. Fair date set for October 26. 1995. 04, 12 (07/01/95) 07/13/95 (07/01/95) (06/30/96) 07/13/95 (06/30/96) PCSSD - Coor for Multicultural Curr Dev Dir of Library Serv LRSD - Assoc Supt for Educ Programs Supv of Media Serv NLRSD - Coor of Instructional Materials (Director of Staff Development. Subject Area Supervisors. PritKipals) 2.1 Schedule of vendors 2.1 (The Multicultural Fair will be jointly planned by LRSD. NLRSD and PCSSD) 3. (Multicultural strategies will be implemented in schools as assessed by administration during classroom observations and teacher conferences) Page: 13 Program Seq 04 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Multicultural Curriculum Program Code: 12 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Marie McNeal Program Goal: To ensure educational equity in the elementary and secondary curriculum and program areas. (Applies to entire document except for page 76. objectives 1. 2. 3. 4.) To collaborate with the PCSSD and the NLRSD to promote multicultural activities and curriculum development. (Applies only to page 76, objectives 1. 2. 3. 4.) L76 Plan Reference Page Number L76 L 76 Objectives Strategies Beginning Dale Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3.1 Write letters to institutions of higher education in the area concerning (he need for such courses 3.1 Promote such courses to (he staffs of each school district 3.2 (Duplication of number) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) 4. To investigate the possibilities of cooperating on strategies Io acquaint staff and corrununities with muhicullural education (07/01/95) (06/30/96) 04, 13 PCSSD Coor of Instructional Materials LRSD - Assoc Supt for Educational Programs NLRSD - Coor of Instructional Materials PCSSD Coord of Multicultural NLRSD Coord of Instructional Materials (LRSD Director of Staff Development, Supervisor of Social Studies) (PCSSD Coor of Multicultural LRSD Assoc Supt for Educational Programs NLRSD Coord of Instructional Materials) 3.1 letters on file 3.1 (The number of teachers enrolled in multicultural courses will increase) 3.1 Promotional instruments file 3.2 (Duplication of number) 3.2 (The number of teachers enrolled in multiculniral courses will increase) 4. (Multicultural education strategies will be used in LRSD classrooms as determined by classroom observations and teacher conferences) 4. (Assessment of community discussion/conferences, feedback from debriefing of multicultural education)Page: 14 Program Seq f: 04 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Multicultural Curriculum Program Code: 12 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Marie McNeal Program Goal: To ensure educational equity in the clemenury and secondary curriculum and program areas. (Applies to entire document except for page 76. objectives 1. 2. 3. 4.) To collaborate with the PCSSD and the NLRSD to promote multicultural activities and curriculum development. (Applies only to page 76, objectives 1, 2, 3, 4.) L76 Plan Reference Page Number L77 L77 L77 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1. To enhance educational equity in instructional methodology and teacher/student Interaction 4.1 Meet to discuss possibilities of seminars, symposiums, or other activities to promote multicultural education among the three districts 4.1 (Plan, schedule, advertise and implement strategies) 1.1 Research and share effective instructioiuil strategies at regularly scheduled council and program area meetings A. Research/effective instructional strategies shared/demonstrated at preschool/cluster/council meetings in all content areas. 1.2 Purchase science supplies for teachers to facilitate the hands-on science approach 04, 14 (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) 07/01/95 (07/01/95) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) 25% (06/30/96) PCSSD Coor of Multicultural LRSD Assoc. Supt for Educational Programs NLRSD Coord of Instructional Materials (Director of Communications, Director of Staff Development) (Curriculum Supervisors. Curriculum Specialists, Principals) Content Area Supervisors Supvs of Specific Content Areas 4,1 Minutes of meeting 4.1 (Three collaborative activities will be held to inform staff and community about multicultural activities) I. (Assessment of instruction/teacher student interaction during classroom/school observation and conference) I. (Increase in student achievement) 1.1 Documentation within the Division of Educational Programs l.I (Assessment of implementation of instructional strategies through classroom observations and teacher conferences) 1.2 Materials purchased 1.2 (Hands-on science activities used in District classrooms)Page: 15 Program Seq #: 04 Revision Date: November 6. 1995 Program Name: Multicultural Curriculum Program Code: 12 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Marie McNeal Program Goal: To ensure educational equity in the elementary and secondary curriculum and program areas. (Applies to entire document except for page 76. objectives 1, 2, 3. 4.) To collaborate with the PCSSD and the NLRSD to promote multicultural activities and curriculum development. (Applies only to page 76, objectives 1. 2, 3, 4.) L77 L77 Plan Reference Page Number L77 L77 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria A. A box of scierKe equipment and supplies was sent to each elementary school. 1.3 Purchase math manipulative for teachers to facilitate hands-on math instruction A. Math manipulatives and supplies were provided for Math Plus teachers. 1.4 Purchase sets of trade books for teachers to facilitate the emphasis on literature and (he wholeness of language approach A. Tradebooks purchased I.S Provide inservice for using materials identified in 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 A. Provided 18 inservices to assist teachers in use of materials 1.6 Identify needs of teachers for improved delivery of instruction using student data, principal recommendation, school improvement plans, and teacher questionnaires as the basis for decision making. (Resource: LRSD Resource Staff Development Guide) A. Visitation report forms are provided to principals after classroom observations. The comments can be used by principals to identify needs for staff development. 04, 15 09/01/95 (07/01/95) 09/19/95 (07/01/95) 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 (07/01/95) 09/01/95 09/15/95 (06/30/96) 09/20/95 (06/30/96) 25% 06/30/96 25% (06/30/96) 25% Supvs of Specific Content Areas Supvs of Specific Content Areas Supervisors of Specific Areas (Curriculum Specialists, Principals) PrirKipals, Teachers, and Content Area Supervisors 1.3 Materials purchased 1.3 (Manipulative are used in District math classrooms) 1.4 Materials purchased 1.4 (Whole language is used in District classrooms) 1.5 Documentation of participants 1.5 (Desired instructional strategies are being implemented in District classrooms as assessed through classroom observations and teacher confereiKes) 1.6 Observation of instruction 1.6 Disaggregation of data 1.6 (Individual Improvement Plans, HPs, reflect identified needs of teachers) Page: 16 Program Seq f: 04 Revision Date: November 6. 1995 Program Name: Mullicuilural Curriculum Program Code: 12 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Marie McNeal Program Goal: To ensure educational equity in the elementary and secondary curriculum and program areas. (Applies to entire document except for page 76. objectives 1, 2, 3, 4.) To collaborate with the PCSSD and the NLRSD to promote multicultural activities and curriculum development. (Applies only to page 76, objectives I, 2, 3, 4.) L77 L78 Plan Reference Page Number L78 L78 L 78 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 2. To incorporate multicultural materials into Ihe instructional programs 1.7 Submit the inservice needs to the Staff Development Department 1.8 Schedule teachers as IdentiRed for the appropriate inservice A. District wide workshops have been planned. B. Eight (8) workshops conducted to improve delivery of instruction. 1.9 Monitor the teachers use of effective instruclioruil and classroom management strategies A. Classroom visitations by curriculum staff are ongoing. 2.1 Review and assess appropriate multicultural materials 04, 16 (07/01/95) (07/01/95) 07/01/95 08/09/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) 25% 25% 06/30/96 25% (06/30/96) (06/30/96) PritKipals Staff Development Department Supervisors of speciRc areas (Principals) (Supervisors of SpeciRc Areas. Curriculum Specialists. Principals) Supervisors of specific areas (Curriculum Specialists. Principals) 1.7 Staff development documentation (Needs identified in school improvement plans) 1.8 Staff development documentation 1.8 (Inservice will be provided that addresses the needs of teachers as identified in Ihe school improvement plan) 1.9 (Assessment of implementation of strategies through classroom observations and teacher conferences) 2. (Observe implementation of materials at teacher conferences and during classroom visits) 2.1 (Multicultural materials used in District classrooms)Page: 17 Program Seq 04 Revision Dale\nNovember 6. 1995 Program Name: Multicultural Curriculum Program Code: 12 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Marie McNeal Program Goal: educational equity in the elementary and secondary curriculum and program areas. (Applies to entire document eaccE! for page 76. ob^ctives 1.2. 3. 4 ) To ensure ewuva\u0026lt;rai u.w ...v.......m....------ To collaborate with the PCSSD and the NLRSD to promote multicultural activities and curriculum development. (Applies only to page 76. objectives 1. 2. 3^.4.) L 78 Plan Reference Page Number L78 L 78 L78 L78 L78 L78 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 3. To implement organizational practices that will enharKe educational equity 2.2 Identify and suggest multicultural material to be purchased at local school level by content and grade 2.3 Schedule workshops on use of materials (where appropriate) 2.4 Monitor the use of appropriate multicultural materials 3.1 Provide teachers with training for effective in- class grouping 3.2 Monitor implementation of strategies through classroom visitations and feedback in follow-up workshops 3.3 Review placement criteria for enrichment/ hoimrs and advanced placement classes 04, 17 (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) Supervisors of specific areas (Curriculum Specialists. Principals) Supervisors of specific areas (Curriculum Specialists, Principals) Supervisors of specific areas (Curriculum Specialists. Principals) (Assoc. Supt.. Assist. Supt.. Principals, Teachers) Supervisors of specific areas Supervisors of specific areas Assoc Supt of Educational Programs 2.2 (Titles/descripiion of materials forwarded to schools) 2.3 (Catalogue listings) 2.3 (Multicultural materials used in District classrooms) 2.4 (Classroom observations/ teacher conferences reflect use of multicultural materials) (3. Educational programs in LRSD have equitable participation and success by all students) 3.1 (Grouping practices are equitable in LRSD classrooms) 3.2 (Assessment of classroom observation) ' 3.3 (Placement practices in LRSD classrooms will increase participation of black students in GT/Honors/AP classes)Page: 18 Program Seq f: 04 Revision Date: November 6. 1995 Program Name: Multicultural Curriculum Program Code: 12 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Marie McNeal Program Goal: To ensure educational equity in the elementary and secondary curriculum and program areas. (Applies to entire document except for page 76. objectives I. 2. 3, 4.) To collaborate with the PCSSD and the NLRSD to promote multicultural activities and curriculum development. (Applies only to page 76, objectives 1.2, 3. 4.) L 78 Plan Reference Page Number L79 L 79 L79 L79 L79 L79 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria A. AP Committee is reviewing placement criteria. 3.4 Provide support Io principals in monitoring the distribution of students in higher level courses to assess gender and race equity 07/01/95 (07/01/95) 25% (06/30/96) Assoc and Asst Supts 3.4 (Classroom observation of student enrollment and enrollment reports to central office will reflect equitable distribution of gender and race) 4. To ensure increased educational equity throt^h inservice training 5. To ensure equity in the selection and use of textbooks (07/01/95) (06/30/96) 4. (Educational programs in LRSD have equitable participation and success by all students) 1 4.1 Refer to activities outlined in items 1.2 - 1.4 above 4.1 (Purchase science supplies, math manipulative, iradebooks) 5.1 Inventory and assess current textbooks for multicultural presence 5.2 Identify the deficiencies existing in current textbooks 5.3 Select and purchase resource materials to replace or supplement areas of deficiency 04, 18 (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) Supervisor of speciflc areas (Assoc Supt of Curr., Subject Area Supervisors. Teachers. Principals) Supervisor of specific areas (Curriculum supervisors. Teachers) (Curriculum supervisors) (Media specialists) (Principals) 4.1 (Updated multicultural materials in schools) 4.1 (Enrollment/implemen-tation of staff development courses) 5. (Criteria checklist that includes multicultural and sex/race bias-free factors is used to select textbooks) 5.1 (Criteria checklist for textbook selection) 5.2 (Deficiencies are identified) 5.3 (Curriculum resource guides are used to provide updates) Page: 19 Program Seq 04 Revision Dale: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Multicultural Curriculum Program Code: 12 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Marie McNeal Program Goal: To ensure educational equity in the elementary and secondary curriculum and program areas. (Applies to entire document except for page 76. objectives 1, 2, 3. 4.) To collaborate with the PCSSD and the NLRSD to promote multicultural activities and curriculum development. (Applies only to page 76, objectives 1, 2. 3. 4.) L79 Plan RefererKe Page Number L79 L79 L79 L 79 L 80 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 6. To achieve equity in (he implementation of special activities 5.4 Provide training for use of supplemental materials 5.5 Monitor teacher implementation of the use of multicultural texts/materials in the curricula 5.6 Develop a checklist for selection of rKw textbooks during the adoption cycle to facilitate the selection of a text that is free of gender, race, and ethnic stereotypes 6.1 Ensure that student participation in special events is multicultural and that the quality of participation is equitable 6.2 Develop guides for each course area that are multicultural in content and that facilitate equity in methodology 04, 19 (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (Curriculum supervisors) Principals and Content Area Supervisors Content Area Supervisors (Assoc. Supt. for Educational Programs) (Assoc. Supt.. Assist. Supt.. Principals. Teachers. Content Area Supervisors) Principals and Teachers Supervisor of specific area 5.4 (Training is provided during cluster meetings, building meetings, minicourses and/or council meetings) 5.5 Schedule/Documentation 5.5 (Assess implementation through classroom observation) 5.5 (Improvement in snident achievement) 5.6 Textbook checklist 5.6 (Textbook checklist implemented to ensure bias-free textbooks) 6. (Increased representation of black smdents in activities currently under- represented) 6.1 Participation data 6.1 (Increased representation of black students in activities currently under-represented) 6.2 (Implemenution of revised curriculum guides)Page: 20 Program Seq iF: 04 Revision Date: November 6. 1995 Program Name: Multicultural Curriculum Program Code: 12 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Marie McNeal Program Goal: To ensure educational equity in the cicmenury and secondary curriculum and program areas. (Applies to entire document except for page 76, objectives I, 2. 3. 4.) To collaborate with the PCSSD and the NLRSD to promote multicultural activities and curriculum development. (Applies only to page 76, objectives I. 2. 3. 4.) L80 Plan Reference Page Number L80 L 80 L80 L80 L80 L80 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criterto 6.3 Monitor the use of the curriculum guide A. Classroom visitation by curriculum staff are ongoing. (07/01/95) 07/01/95 (06/30/96) 25% (Principals, Subject Area Supervisors) 6.3 (Guide usage is monitored through classroom observations teacher conferences and abacus assessment) 7. To ensure the maintenance of challenging ami relevant course offerings 7.1 Review research and recommended practices for each content/program area A. Research and practices shared by curriculum staff are ongoing. B. Draft Science Standards and State Science Framework were used in revising the science curriculum and providing inservice for teachers. 7.2 Assess (he LRSD course content lo identify needs for changes 7.3 Submit recommendation ami rationale for any new courses to the Assoc Supt for Ed Prog 7.4 Develop curriculum guides for approved courses 7.S Provide inservice for staff on implementation of courses 04, 20 (07/01/95) (07/01/95) 07/01/95 07/01/95 (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) 25% 25% (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (06/30/96) (Assoc. Supt. for Curr., Subject Area Supervisors) (Curriculum supervisors) (Curriculum supervisors) (Curriculum supervisors) (Curriculum supervisors) Content Area Supervisors 7. (Comparison of student achievement with state/ national level) 7.1 (Documentation of research and practices reviewed) 7.2 (Documented comparison with state, national curriculum standards) 7.3 (Documentation of recommendation and rationale submitted) 7.4 (Implementation of guides) 7.S Documentation of inservice Page\n21 Program Seq f: 04 Revision Date: November 6. 1995 Program Name: Multicultural Curriculum Program Code: 12 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Marie McNeal Program Goal: To ensure educational equity in (he elementary and secondary curriculum and program areas. (Applies to entire document except for page 76, objectives 1. 2, 3, 4.) To collaborate with the PCSSD and the NLRSD to promote multicultural activities and curriculum development. (Applies only to page 76, objectives I, 2. 3. 4.) Plan Reference Page Number L 80 L 80 Objectives Srategies Begiiuiing Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 7.5 (Conduct staff development on implementation of new courses) 7.6 Conduct workshops (o appropriate staff on new course offerings 7.7 Monitor implementation of the courses, including equity In assignment of students (07/01/95) (07/01/95) (07/01/95) 06/30/96 (06/30/96) (06/30/96) Content Area Supervisors Principals (Curriculum supervisors) 7.6 Documentation of workshop 7.7 (Moniior/implementation through classroom observations and teacher conferences) L80 L80 L64 L64 7.8 Review placement criteria for enriched/ honors and advanced placement courses A. AP Comminee is reviewing placement criteria. 7.9 Monitor enrollment in courses to ensure equity in assigrunent/participation of students 7.10 (Monitor) staffing 7.11 A speaker's bureau will be developed to promote a better undersanding of multicultural education in the schools and throughout the community. A. Original obligation completed. Aniculation through PTA and Parent-Teacher conferences allows the community to develop an ongoing and better understanding of Multiculniral Education. 04, 21 (07/01/95) 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 (06/30/96) 25% 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 25% Assoc Supt for Educational Prog Assoc Supt for Ed Prog \u0026amp; Principals 7.8 Replacement criteria reviewed 7.8 (Participation of black students in GT/Honors/AP courses will increase) 7.9 Data on file 7.9 (Assessment of enrollment in courses currently under-represented by race (blacks) and sex) 7.11 Parents and community will articulate a positive and knowledgeable understanding of multicultural education. Page: 22 Program Seq #: 04 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Muhicutniral Curriculum Program Code: 12 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Marie McNeal Program Goal\nTo ensure educational equity in the elementary and secondary curriculum and program areas. (Applies to entire document except for page 76. objectives I, 2. 3. 4.) To collaborate with the PCSSD and the NLRSD to promote multicultural activities and curriculum development. (Applies only to page 76, objectives 1. 2, 3, 4.) Plan RefererKe Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Dale Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 17 9.0 A committee with at least one represenutive from each party in the desegregation case will be established to review the curriculum requirements and programs for the three Pulaski County school districts. The committee will recommend any curriculum or program changes necessary to facilitate and/or enhance the movement of students among the districts in Pulaski County. 10.0 Develop and submit to the Board of Directors for adoption a definition and policy regarding multicultural education that provides a rationale and clearly defined goals. 11.0 Initiate a procedure to field-test new curriculum as it is being developed, providing an opportunity to evaluate the program strengths and weaknesses prior to district wide usage. 07/01/95 06/30/96 9.1 (Meetings with parties from all three Pulaski county districts will meet and discuss curriculum/program offerings and make reccomendaiions where applicable.) 9.2 Recommended curriculum changes will be reviewed and submitted to appropriate administrative department level for appropriate action 10.1 Align state and district approved learner outcome goals with all district curriculum guides submitted for Board approval. 11.1 Field testing of new curriculum designed and evaluated by ASDE 04, 22 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 Deputy Supt. Deputy Supt. Curriculum Supervisors Ark. State Dept, of Ed.. Deputy Supt., Curriculum Supervisors 9.1 Implementation of curriculum changes 10.1 District multicultural curriculum reflects learner outcome rationale and goals. 11.1 Implementation and revisions of Held tested curriculum. Page: 23 Program Seq #: 04 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Multicultural Curriculum Program Code: 12 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Marie McNeal t Program Goal: To ensure educational equity in the elementary and secondary curriculum and program areas. (Applies to entire document except for page 76. objectives I. 2. 3. 4.) To collaborate with the PCSSD and the NLRSD to promote multicultural activities and curriculum development. (Applies only to page 76, objectives 1. 2. 3. 4.) Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 11.1 (ASDE provides guidelines and structure for the development and piloting of new curriculum. A. Social Studies framework currently being piloted by ADE. 04, 23 07/01/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 50%LRSD FY 94-95 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Program Seq 05 Page: 1 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Special Education Program Code: 15 Primary Leader: Brady Gadberry Secondary Leader: Dr. Patty Kohler Program Description: PUIPOS. special cducalion is specially designed inslnicion. a.cos. .o parent, lo mee. die unique ,eds of siudenis wilb Xca^X'nM.m aIZhs inslihliions. odier senings: inslnichon m Ac. (IDEA) to. .esuhs in an adverse effec. on educa.ional performance and to A fid, coniinuum of services is provided which toludes mu,iiples oprions f' institutions, and in other settings: and instruction in . --- determined eligible for special education services when a disability is present as defined in ccoorrrreessppoonndoiinnge needu floorr sspueccvikali ceduucvatioun saewrvoiicwess.. r. ----- ------ -- -------------- -- r , .. hme ten idemified as having diaabililies defined by die IDEA. During the 1992 93 school year. 8.13% of the d.stnct s population or 2,026 students received special education services (Dec. 1. 1992 count). District Goal Support: Program Goal: Goa, , - ,mp,emen. iniegramd educa.iona, progmms to, wil, ensure to, a snidenB grow aodemtofiy socMy a-i T^al'^.^'smdeto wd^dT -hey 21s, Cenniiy. Goa, 4 So,ici, and secum financia, and otor resources to, are necessary ,o fidly suppon our schoo,s. mCudmg our desegregahon p,an. Goa, ,ean,ing for a snidenB. Goa, 6 Ensure to, equi^r occurs in a phases of schoo, aciviries and operaiions. snidenu enrobed ,o reficc, to Disfric, racia, composifion and ,o be comparabie ,0 su,c/na,iona, smlisiics in provision of free The goal of the special education program is to reduce the disparate number of minority appropriate public education to studenu with disabilities. Plan References: LI13 - 123 FY Program Budget: $56,846.12 1st Qtr Expend: $8,944.07 3rd Qtr Expend: YTD Expenditures: $8,944.07 2nd Qtr Expend: 4th Qtr Expend: Related Function Codes: 05, 1 J LRSD FY 95-96 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Page: 2 I I Program Seq iti 05 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Special Education Program Code: 15 Primary Leader: Brady Gadbcrry Secondary Leader: Dr. Patty Kohler Program Goal: To ensure equity in representation of black males in special education through comprehensive staff development. (To reduce the disparate number of minority students cru-oUed in special education to reflect the District racial composition and to be comparable to state/nalional statistics in provision of FAPE to students with disabilities.) I Plan Reference Page Number L 113 - 114 L 114 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1. Provide Inservice (hat focuses on teacher behavior toward a disproportion of minority students especially black males in special education. (A minimum of 80 percent of the Districts staff will utilize strategies derived from the District's staff development program that will assist black males in improving academic and social skills.) Participate in a tri-district assessment committte with a planned agenda and stated direction, 1.2 Identify teachers with high referral rales of black males to special education. A. Special Education classrolls due B. Enrollment data compiled C. Adjustments made regarding teacher placement 05, 2 07/01/95 07/01/95 09/15/95 09/15/95 09/15/95 06/30/96 06/30/96 09/15/95 09/30/95 09/30/95 Director, Div. of Exceptional Children\nSupv/Coor. of Spec. Ed. Principals 1. ( List of inservice topics, personnel involved, and dates, survey results re: inservice effectiveness will reflect increased implementation of appropriate strategies, data re: learning center effectiveness will reflect increase in successful placement in less restrictive settings. 80% of (he District's staff will utilize strategies derived from the Districts staff development program that will assist black males in improving academic and social skills.) 1.2 (Data compiled yearly, re: over representation will reflect decrease in over representation in targeted schools)Page: 3 Program Seq iV: 05 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Special Education Program Code: 15 Primary Leader: Brady Gadberry Secondary Leader: Dr. Patty Kohler Program Goal: To ensure equity in representation of black males in special education through comprehensive staff development. (To reduce the disparate number of minority students enrolled in special education to reflect the District racial composition and to be comparable to state/national statistics in provision of FAPE to students with disabilities.) Plan Reference Page Ntanber L 114 L 114 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Dale Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1.3 Schedule inservice. A. LRSD cosponsored state conference on Inclusion B. Preschool Inservice for all special education teachers C. D. E 07/01/95 08/10/95 08/15/95 06/30/96 08/11/95 08/15/95 (Supv. Spec. Ed) 1.3 Rates of dismissal out of Spec Ed of black males/other students will be increased (List of inservice topics, personnel involved, and dates, survey results rerinservice effectiveness will reflect increased implementation of appropriate strategies, data re\nlearning center effectiveness will reflect increase in successful placement in less restrictive senings) Panicipation in Race/Culniral Diversity Conference Inservice at King on Modifications Request made to all schools to schedule inservice on modifications F. 0. H. 08/15/95 08/16/95 08/23/95 08/15/95 08/16/95 08/23/95 Presentation to NLRSD examiners on SLD Transition Inservice for Secondary LRSD cosponsored State conference on literacy 1.4 Arrange substitutes for regular teachers. 05, 3 09/20/95 09/28/95 09/29/95 07/01/95 09/20/95 09/28/95 09/29/95 06/30/96 SOS 1.4 (Data re: placement in learning center will reflect increased successful placement in less restrictive senings) Page: 4 Program Seq f: 05 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Special Education Program Code: 15 Primary Leader: Brady Gadberry Secondary Leader: Dr. Patty Kohler Program Goal: To ensure equity in representation of black males in special education through comprehensive staff development. (To reduce the disparate number of minority students enrolled in special education to reflect the District racial composition and to be comparable to state/national statistics in provision of FAPE to students with disabilities.) i I 1 :i Plan Reference Page Number L 114 L 114 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1.5 Provide inservice that focuses on: a. Behavior modification for teacher behavior, b. Provide opportunities for teachers to know, accept and utilize information regarding learning styles, language/ dialect, student ways of reacting/ behaving, and value systems. A. LRSD cosponsored state conference on Inclusion B. Preschool Inservice for all special education teachers C. D. E. 07/01/95 08/10/95 08/15/95 06/30/96 08/11/95 08/15/95 Participation in Race/Cultural Diversity Conference Inservice at King on Modifications Request made to all schools to schedule inservice on modifications F. G. H. 08/15/95 08/16/95 08/23/95 08/15/95 08/16/95 08/23/95 Presentation to NLRSD examiners on SLD Transition Inservice for Secondary LRSD cosponsored Sute conference on literacy 1.6 Apply skills at center with students. A. Learning Center programs serve students in two classes 05, 4 09/20/95 09/28/95 09/29/95 07/01/95 08/21/95 09/20/95 09/28/95 09/29/95 06/30/96 09/30/95 Director, Div of Exceptional Children\nLearning Center Staff Regular teachers 1.5 Decrease in discipline referrals (List of inservice topics, personnel involved, and dates, survey results re\ninservice effectiveness will reHecl increased implementation of appropriate strategies, dau re: learning center effectiveness will reflect increased successful placement in less restrictive settings) 1.6 (Data re\nshident placement will reflect increased success of students returning to schools from center.)Page: 5 Program Seq f: 05 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Special Education Program Code: 15 Primary Leader: Brady Gadbeny Secondary Leader: Dr. Patty Kohler ih'ogram Goal: equity In representation of black males In special education through comprehensl.e staff development. (To reduce Ihe disparate number of minority students enrolled in special education lo renect Ihe To ensure ~ *' ... ~ ----------------- -- ----------- ---.- -.-.-.-.-.-.-..-.-.-. ..... ........ e_.-_____1-t___r ri m? JSe-AUISdime \\ District racial composition and to be comparable to state/national statistics in provision of FAPE lo students with disabilities.) Plan RefererKe Page Number L 114 L 114 149 149 149 149 149 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1.7 Return to school. A. Students in regular classes monitored 1.8 Monitor teacher eflectiveness. A. Students in regular classes monitored 1.9 Determine agenda meeting 1.10 Establish consistency in areas of assessment 1.11 Screening A. Examiner meeting D. Mental Reurdation Identification revised C. Presentation to NLRSD examiners re: SLD 1.12 Evaluation instruments A. Examiner meeting B. Mental Retardation Identificaiion revised C. Presentation to NLRSD examiners re: SLD 1,13 Eligibility criteria 05, 5 07/01/95 08/21/95 07/01/95 08/21/95 08/16/95 08/10/95 09/20/95 08/16/95 08/10/95 09/20/95 06/30/96 09/30/95 06/30/96 09/30/95 08/16/95 08/10/95 09/20/95 08/16/95 08/10/95 09/20/95 Regular teachers Supervisors Principals 1.7 (Data re: student placement will reflec\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_694","title":"Report: ''Little Rock School District 1995-96 First Quarter Status Report, Program Planning and Budget Document for Desegregation Programs,'' Volume II, exhibit 1","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1995-11-21"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance"],"dcterms_title":["Report: ''Little Rock School District 1995-96 First Quarter Status Report, Program Planning and Budget Document for Desegregation Programs,'' Volume II, exhibit 1"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/694"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["budgets"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nVOLUME II FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NOV 2 i IV \u0026gt;5 1995-96 FIRST QUARTER STATUS REPORT JAMES W. McCORMACK, CLERK By\nDhP CLtRK PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGET DOCUMENT FOR DESEGREGATION PROGRAMS PLANNING, RESEARCH, AND EVALUATION DEPARTMENT November 21, 1995 EXHIBIT I School Support Cluster * Office of Desegregation/Student Assignment * Staff Development * Library/Media * Computerized Transportation * Data Processing * Minority Teacher Recruitment * Educational Equity Monitoring * Commitment to Desegregation/Leadership * Summer School (Interdistrict) * Summer Learning Program - JTPA * Facilities * Guidance/Counseling Program Leadership * Employment PracticesProgram Seq f: 20 LRSD FY 95-96 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Page: I Revision Date: November 6. 1995 Program Name\nOffice of Desegregation/Student Assignment Program Code: 06 Primary Leader: Dr. C. Russell Mayo. Jr. Secondary Leader: Nancy Acre Program Description: The Office of Desegregation is charged with monitoring the implementation of the Desegregation Plan which includes the appropriate assignment of students to schools. The capacities of the elementary area schools are determined in accordartce with Arkansas accreditation standards which have the following limits: Grade: Maximum Number of Snidents Per Class (Average) Maximum Number of Students in Any Class Kirxlerganen 20 25 First-Third n 25 Fourth-Sixth 25 28 The overall racial composition of the elementary area schools and the space available for recruitment at those schools depend upon the number of students who enroll in Incentive and Inteidistrict Schools. The initial racial composition of the Incentive Schools is expected to be predominately black. It is expected that at least 600 black LRSD students will attend Interdistrict Schools, District Goal Support: Ensure that equity occurs in all phases of school activities and operations Program Goal: To implement a student assignment process that is consistent with the approved Desegregation Plan [ Plan References: L 139 ] [FY Program Budget: YTD Expenditures: $500,451.75 $117,897.77 1st Qtr Expend: 2nd Qtr Expend: $117,897.77 3rd Qtr Expend: 4th Qtr Expend: 1 FTE 13.0 I Related Function Codes: I 20, 1 Program Seq *: 20 Program Name: Office of Desegregation/Student Assignment Program Code: 06 Program Goal: Plan Reference Page Number L 139 LRSD FY 95-96 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Primary Leader: Dr C. Russell Mayo To implement a student assignment process that is consistent with the approved Desegregation Plan Objectives Strategies SecorKlary Leader: Beginning Date Completion Date Page: 2 Revision Date: Nancy Acre Responsibility November 6. 1995 Evaluation Criteria (1.0 To knplement magnet school assignments) (2.0 To implement interdistrict school assignments) 07/01/95 06/30/96 Assoc. Supt. for Desegregation 1.0 Assignments are consistent with the Desegregation Plan as evidenced by an annual review of assignment data 1.1 Magnet Schools - The assignment process to (original) magnet schools will not change under this Plan. A. Assignments are being made per the plan. 1.2 Monitor Student Assignment and enroihnent at Magnet Schools. A. Magnet school seats are monitored and filled on a daily basis. 6. Waiting lists are monitored daily to fill vacancies. 2.1 Interdistrict Schools - LRSD and PCSSD agree to establish interdistrict schools as described in the Interdistrict Desegregation Plan. A. Six interdistrict schools have been established as of 08/01/94 20. 2 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 25% 06/30/96 25% 25% 06/30/96 06/30/96 Assoc. Supt for Desegregation Assoc. Supt. for Desegregation Assoc. Supt for Desegregation Assoc. Supt for Desegregation 2.0 Assignments are consistent with the Desegregation Plan as evidenced by an annual review of assignment dataPage: 3 Program Seq *: 20 Revision Date\nNovember 6. 1995 Program Name: Office of Desegregation/Student Assignment Program Code\n06 Primary Leader: Dr. C. Russell Mayo Secondary Leader: Nancy Acre Program Goal: To implement a student assignment process that is consistent with the approved Desegregation Plan Plan Reference Page Number Ot^ectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria (3.0 To implement elementary area school assignments). The total capacitv of the elen\u0026gt;entarv area schools is 9.676. 07/01/95 06/30/96 Assoc Supt. for Desegregation 3.0 Assignments are consistent with the Desegregation Plan as evidenced by an annual review of assignment data 3.1 Students will be assigned to the elementary area schools by attendance zones. A. Students are assigned to the elen^entary area schools by attendance zones. 3.2 The elementary area school attendance zones are drawn to establish a racial balance at each school of 55 percent black and 45 percent white with a variance of 5 percent The recruitment of white students to elementary area schools may increase the percentage of white students at these schools, but no school shall have a racial composition of greater that 60 percent white. A. The racial balances are monitored daily. 3.3 Students presently assigned to elementary area schools will be given the option to remain in these schools (grandfathered). A. Grandfathered students are monitored. 3.4 After grandfathered students have been assigned, students in the attendance zone will be assigned to the elementary area schools. 20, 3 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 98% 06/30/96 98% 06/30/96 25% 06/30/96 Assoc Supt for Desegregation Assoc Supt for Desegregation Assoc Supt. for Desegregation Assoc SupI for Desegregation 3.1 Enrollment Data 3.3 Student requests to remain in area schools are granted. 3 4 Attendance zone students are assigned based on available seats. Program Seq : 20 Program Name: Office of Desegregation/Student Assignment Program Code: 06 Primary Leader: Dr. C. Russell Mayo Secondary Leader: Program Goal: To implement a student assignment process that is consistent with the approved Desegregation Plan Paa: 4 Revision Date: Nancy Acre November 6, 1995 Plan Reference Page Number L 139 L 148 Directives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria A. Students have been assigned and notified. 3.5 If there is no space available at a student's zoned school or if assignment of the student to the school would put the school out of compliance with racial balance requirements, the student will be assigned to the closest school with capacity which meets racial balance requirements. A. Students are reassigned. 3.6 The elementary school zones will provide a feeder pattern for elementary students going to lunior high school students going to high school. A. Feeder patterns are established. This strategy completed in 1992 3.7 Students in elementary area school zones will be given the option to select an incentive school. A. Options are available for selection to incentive schools. Completion date of 1992 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 98% 06/30/96 98% 06/30/96 06/30/96 Assoc. Supt. for Desegregation Assoc Supt. for Desegregation Assoc. Supt- for Desegregation 3.5 Students are reassigned in accordance with Deseg. Plan. 3 6 A feeder pattern is established for the organizational levels. 3.7 Options were granted in accordance to assignment plan. (4.0 To implement incentive school assignments). The capacity of the incentive schools is 2,558. 07/01/95 06/30/96 Assoc. Supt for Desegregation 4.0 Incentive School Assignments are made in accordance with the Desegregation Plan requirements. 4.1 Each incentive school will have an attendance zone that encompasses the neighborhood around the school (primary attendance zone). A. Attendance zones established in 1992 20, 4 07/01/95 06/30/96 Assoc. Supt. for Desegregation 4 1 School zone mapsPage: s Program Seq *: 20 Revision Date: November 6. 1995 Program Name: Office of Desegregation/Student Assignment Program Code: 06 Primary Leader: Dr. C. Russell Mayo Secondary Leader: Nancy Acre Program Goal: To implement a student assignment process that is consistent with the approved Desegregation Plan Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria CO 194 CO 194 4.2 Students presently assigned to incentive schools will be given the option to remain in these schools (grandfathered). A. Students are notified of options. 4.3 After grandfathered students have been identified and assigned, students in the primary attendance zone will be assigned to the incentive schools. A. Students are assigned and notified. 4.4 All incentive school students will have the option to be assigned to an elementary area school to be selected by LRSD in accordance with desegregation considerations A. Transfers were allowed as available. 4.5 In order to assist in meeting the desegregation requirements, a certain number of seats for black and white students will be reserved (or each pre-kindergarlen and kindergarten class. The seats reserved for white children shall not remain permanently vacant if unfilled. Sufficient time should be allowed for timely, vigorous, and sustained recruitment efforts before filling these seats. A. Seats were reserved until judge released them 4.6 The incentive schools will have a maximum pupit/teacher ratio of 20 to 1 20, 5 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 98% 06/30/96 98% 06/30/96 50% 06/30/96 09/01/95 06/30/96 Assoc Supt for Desegregation Assoc Supt. for Desegregation Assoc. Supt.fbr Desegregation Assoc Supt for Desegregation 4.3 Enrollment data\nschool zone maps. 4.4 Enrollment data 4.5 Reserved seats are available by race for pre* kindergarten and kindergarten studentsPage: 6 Program Seq #: 20 Revision Date: Novembers. 1995 Program Name: Office of Desegregation/Student Assignment Program Code: 06 Primary Leader: Or. C. Russell Mayo SecorKlary Leader: Nancy Acre Program Goal: To implement a student assignment process that is consistent with the approved Desegregation Plan Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria A. Assignments are monitored closely. 07/01/95 25% 4.7 There may be more than 20 students per classroom, however, there will be an aide in each class and possible a second teacher in those classes. 07/01/95 06/30/96 A. Classrooms are monitored 07/01/95 25% 4.6 Assign students with sensitryity to the relationship between placement stabilitv and academic progress as well as the need to measure the impact of incentive programs or student achievement. 07/01/95 06/30/96 A. Assignments are monitored. 07/01/95 25% 4.9 Student assignment process must be the result of carefuHy coordinated decision-making. The incentive school staffs and the LRSD departments responsible for desegregation, student recruitment and assignment, and planning and evaluation must assess the short-and longterm academic and social impact of any anticipated student reassignments 07/01/95 06/30/96 CO 194 A. Assessments are made and studied carefully 4.10 The district must be able to demonstrate that the investment has paid the expected dividends for children, if not, changes must be made guickiv before children are lost along with the settlement money. A. Studies are being carried out. 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 25% 06/30/96 25% 20, 6 7 Page: Program Seq f: 20 Revision Date: November 6. 1995 Program Name: Office of Desegregation/Student Assignment Program Code: 06 Primary Leader: Dr. C. Russell Mayo Secondary Leader: Nancy Acre Program Goal: To implement a student assignment process that is consistent with the approved Desegregation Plan Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria L 140 (5.0 To implement Desegregation Transfers) 4.11 When making student assignments, keep in mind that there Is a relationship between double funding and enrollment figures that represents the greatest return on investment The district is bound to keep its pledge to doubte fund each incentive school for six years or as long as the school maintains an enrollment above 60% black. District must also keep in mind that the incentive schools educate only a small portion of the class that prevailed in the desegregation lawsuit. Ensure that a portion of the incentive school funding fulfills the plan's commitment that \"the children who are in racially-isolated settings are provided meaningful opportunities for desegregated experiences/activities.\" A. The incentive schools are being closely studied and rrtonitored. 5.1 Junior and senior high school students may transfer to another school as long as the reassignment allows both the sending and receiving school to comply with the desegregation requirement and a seat is available. The minimum black percentage is 25 percent below the districtwide percentage of blacks in grades 712. The minimum and maximum black percentages constitute the desegregation requirement (for acceptable range) for a desegregation transfer The desegregation requirements in secondary schools is that all schools will remain within a range of 12 1/2 percent above to 25 percent below the districtwide percentage of black students at each organizational level (i.e., high school and Junior high school). A. Assignments are made according to the plan. 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 25% 06/30/96 25% Assoc Supt for Desegregation 5.1 Racial composition of student enrolhnents are within acceptable ranges. 20, 7Program Seq #\nProgram Name: Program Code: 20 Page: 6 Program Goal: Plan Reference Page Number L 140 L 140 Office of Desegregation/Student Assignment 06 To Implement a student Primary Leader\nDr, C. Russell Mayo assignment process that is consfelent with the approved Desegregatfen Plan Secondary Leader: Revision Date: Nancy Acre Objectives Strategies 5.2 Elementary students may transfer to '-------...w ..,aj uaiisiei IO an incenlive school only K such a transfer enhances ----A wr.. a . desegregation at the incentive school. Desegregation transfers will be granted elementary area schools that are diflicull Io desegregate A. Desegregation transfers guidelines. to meet acceptable 5.3 A student may make Iwo desegregation tranfAr at Ae.\u0026lt;.k _______. ** sown Kansfers at each organizational level intermediate. Junior or (primary, senior high school) The SI JVd*\", \"S'OBSon transfer la to allow a student to return to his school assignment. A. Transfers are monitored. umrted oenad Onr\u0026gt;A Aak a limited period once each Schools only). or her previous year (Secondary A Desegregation transfers were granted as determined to be appropriate 5.5 LRSD will provide transportation desegregation transfer students effective to do so. for where it is cost Novembers. 1995 (60 To implement Sibling Transfers) lieMgregalion transfers using current routes 20, 8 Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 25% 06/30/96 25% 06/30/96 60% 06/30/96 95% Assoc. Supt for Desegregation Assoc, Supt for Desegregation Assoc, Supt. for Desegregation Assoc. Supt. for Desegregation 5.2 Transfers reflect an Improvement in racial balance. 5.3 Desegregation transfer reports reflect appropriate utilization by students 5.4 Desegregation transfer reports reflect appropriate by students. use 5.5 Maintain records of number of students transported using desegregation transfers.Page: 9 Program Seq #: 20 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Office of Desegregation/Student Assignment Program Code: 06 Primary Leader: Dr. C. Russell Mayo Secondary Leader\nNancy Acre Program Goal: To implement a student assignment process that is consistent with the approved Desegregation Plan Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 6.1 Sibling transfers do not apply Io magnet schools. (NOTE\nSiblings are brothers/sisters. or half-brothers/sisters. residing at the same address with brothers/sisters. or half-brothers/sisters. who are enrolled in the LRSD.) A. Magnet assignments follow approved guidelines. 6.2 A student entering the LRSD after fee 1991- 92 school year wiH not be allowed to make a sibling preference transfer to a school outside the student's attendance zone. A. Transfers are monitored. 6.3 Any student who makes a sibling preference transfer before fee 1991-92 school year may remain at the school to which the student transferred until graduation to fee next organizational level. A. Transfers are monitored. 6.4 Sibling preference transfers will be granted if a seat is available and the transfer will allow both the sending and receiving schools to comply with the desegregation requirements. A. Transfers are monitored. 20, 9 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 25% 06/30/96 25% 06/30/96 25% 06/30/96 25% Assoc. Supt for Desegregation Assoc. Supt. for Desegregation Assoc. Supt for Desegregation Assoc Supt for Desegregation 6.1 Publish/distribute procedures regarding sibling transfers. 6.2 Publish/distribute procedures regarding sibling transfers. 6 3 Student transfers reflect acceptance/ rejection of transfer options 6 4 Documentation of sibling transfers meet desegregation requirements.Program Seq : 20 Page: 10 Program Name: Program Code: Office of Desegregation/Student Assignment 06 Revision Date: Novembers. 1995 Program Goal: Plan Reference Page Number L 141 Primary Leader: Dr. C. Russell Mayo To KTiplement a student assignment process that is consistent with the approved Desegregation Plan Secondary Leader: Nancy Acre Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility (7 To implement Transfer of Children of Employees Assignments) 6.5 Sibling transfer applicants must have a sibling currently enrolled in LRSD. Sibling transfers will be granted only to siblings of grandfathered students. A. All transfers are monitored. 7.1 LRSD employees may enroll their children at the schools where they work. A. Transfers are made as requested by employees. 7.2 This provision is not intended to authorize interdistrict transfers (transfers to NLRSO or PCSSD) other than those authorized by the court- approved desegregation plan. A. Rule is observed. 7.3 The transfer of the children of employees is subject to desegregation requirements and the capacity of the particular school. A. Transfers are monitored. 7.4 LRSD is not obligated to provide transportation. A. Rule is applied. 20, 10 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 25% 06/30/96 06/30/96 90% 06/30/96 25% 06/30/96 25% 06/30/96 25% Assoc. Supt. for Desegregation Assoc. Supt. for Desegregation Assoc. Supt. for Desegregation Human Resources Director Assoc Supt. for Desegregation Assoc. Supt. for Desegregation Assoc. Supt. for Desegregation Evaluation Criteria R 6.5 Sibling transfer requirements fl are in accordance with D established requirements fl 5ois requested In M t Evaluation 7 1 Employees enrolled in schools accordance with established requirements. 7.2 All interdistrict transfers are court approved 7.3 Student transfers are consistent with capacities and desegregation requirements. 7.4 Transportation is provided by patrons of employees.Page: 11 Program Seq *: 20 Revision Date: November 6. 1995 Program Name: Office of Desegregation/Student Assignment Program Code: 06 Primary Leader: Or. C. Russell Mayo Secondary Leader: Nancy Acre Program Goal: To implement a student assignment process that is consistent with the approved Desegregation Plan Plan Reference Page Number L 141-142 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria (8 To implement the Reassignment Process) 7.5 This provision does not apply to magnet schools. A. Rule is observed. 7.6 The order of preference for assigning the children of employees is listed below: 7.6.1 First preference\nattendance zone students with siblings 7.6.2 Second preference\nattendance zone students without siblings 7.6.3 Third preference: children of employees 7 6 4 Fourth preference: desegregation transfers 7.6.5 Fifth preference: M-to-M transfers 7 6.6 Sixth preference: Act 609, Act 624, and legal transfers. A. Above guidelines are followed. 20, 11 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 25% 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 25% Assoc. Supt for Desegregation Assoc Supt. for Desegregation Assoc. Supt. for Desegregation Assoc Supt for Desegregation Assoc Supt for Desegregation Assoc Supt for Desegregation Assoc Supt for Desegregation Asso Supt. for Desegregation Assoc Supt for Desegregation 7.6 Documentation of assignments 8.0 The assignment process is consistent with the desegregation requirements.Program Seq *: 20 Page: 12 Revision Date\nProgram Name\nOffice of Desegregation/Student Assignment November 6. 1995 Program Code: 06 Primary Leader: Dr. C. Russell Mayo Program Goal: Secondary Leader: To implement a student assignment process that is consistent with the approved Desegregation Plan Nancy Acre Plan Reference Page Number Objectives . Strategies 8-1 Every effort will be made to install portable buildings in order to accommodate overflow situations at a particular grade level Only if a building cannot be installed, the student will be reassigned to the nearest school that has a seat available in the student's feeder zone. If the student cannot be assigned to any of the schools in the student's feeder zone, the student will be reassigned to a school in a contiguous feeder zone. The Student Assignment Office will be responsible for aH reassignments Reassigned students will be placed on the waiting list for the appropriate attendance zone school. A. Waiting lists are established. 8.2 The minimum black percentage for each elementary area school is 40 percent black Any assignment that causes a school to fall below the minimum black percentage will not be granted In such cases, the student wiM be reassigned to the nearest school that meets the minimum black percentage requirement and has a seat available. If the student cannot be assigned to any of the schools In the student's feeder zone, the student will be assigned to a school in a contiguous feeder zone. A. Alternate assignments comply with desegregation guidelines 20, 12 Beginning Date 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 Completion Date 06/30/96 95% 06/30/96 95% Responsibility Assoc. Supt. for Desegregation Assoc Supt for Desegregation Evaluation Criteria 6.1 Portables are installed in accordance with Deseg. Plan 6 2 Rosters reflect student assignment percentages are within acceptable racial balance. MixPage: 13 Program Sq *: 20 Revision Date: November 6. 1995 Program Name: Office of Desegregation/Student Assignment Program Code: 06 Primary Leader: Dr C. Russell Mayo Secondary Leader: Nancy Acre Program Goal: To implement a student assignment process that is consistent with the approved Desegregation Plan Plan Reference Page Number L 142 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria (9 To establish effective and efficient student assignment procedures) 07/01/95 06/30/96 Assoc. Supt for Desegregation 9 0 Assignment procedures are effective and consistent with the desegregation requirements. 9.1 The Student Assignment Office will\nmonitor new assignments\nprocess all data entry work for elementary schools (data entry tasks decentralized 1992-93 school year)\nprocess inlerdistrict M-to-M transfers and magnet assignments\nreassign students because of over-crowdedness or desegregation requirements\nconsider appeals\nconduct recruitment efforts (transferred to recruitment program)\nprocess desegregation transfer\nassign all earty childhood and incentive school students\nand process all special transfers (Act 609, Act 624, etc.). A. Assignments are monitored daily. B. Appeals Committee reviews and acts on appeals submitted Io them 9.2 New students to the District who enroll after May 17, 1989 will not have to come to the Student Assignment Office to obtain an assignment. Each school will be authorized to enroll students who live within the attendance zone of that school. A. Schools may enroll students in attendance zone. 20, 13 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 25% 50% 06/30/96 90% Assoc. Supt. for Desegregation Assoc Supt. for Desegregation 9.1 The student assignment process will be effective in assigning students and process special transfers to assist with racial balance. A Enrollment Data B Roster of committee members Agendas from meetings 9.2 Each area school will have the ability to assign students within their attendance zone.Program Seq : 20 Page: 14 Program Name\nRevlaton Date\nProgram Code\nProgram Goal: Plan Reference Page Number Office of Desegregation/Student Assignment 06 Primary Leader: Dr. C. Russell Mayo Secondary Leader\nNovember 6, 1995 To implement a student assignment process that is consistent with the approved Desegregation Plan Nancy Acre Objectives Strategies 9 3 The Student Assignment Handbook includes the timeline and procedures used by the schools and the Student Assignment Office to assign students. The Student Assignment Handbook will be revised each year, as necessary, to reflect any changes in the procedures for assigning students Changes will be made as needed to include new deadlines and to Improve the implementation of the court-approved student assignment plan. The handbook will be developed by the Student Assignment Office and dist^uted to the schools and the parties each year. A. Handbook is updated as needed (10 To monitor all aspects of the Desegregation Plan) 10.1 Review Program Budget Documents to identify potential probtems A PBD is reviewed. 10.2 Conduct site visits as necessary. A Site visits are conducted 20, 14 Beginning Date 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 Completion Date 06/30/96 25% 06/30/96 06/30/96 25% 06/30/96 25% Responsibility Assoc. Supt. for Desegregation Assoc. Supt for Desegregation Assoc. Supt for Desegregation. Desegregation Facilitator Assoc. Supt for Desegregation. Desegregation Facilitator Evaluation Criteria 9.3 Revised Student Assignment Handbook is published and distributed. 10.0 Identification of implementation and effoctiveness problems as evidence by the Program Budget Document 10 1 Budget Documents are reviewed and problems are listed. 10.2 Site visits are documented 1 JPaoe*. 15 Program Seq *: 20 Revision Date: November 6,1995 Program Name: Office of Desegregation/Student Assignment Program Code: 06 Primary Leader\nDr. C. Russell Mayo Secorxlary Leader: Nancy Acre Program Goal: To implement a student assignment process that is consistent with the approved Desegregation Plan Plan Reference Page Number CO 166 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 10.3 Develop and implement improvement plans as needed. A. Improvenwnt plans are being studied. 10.4 Monitor implementation of improvement plans. A. Simple plans are being monitored. 10.16 Before the court will consider approving the construction project at J. A Fair High School, the LRSD must account for the 1,270 square feet difference between the 3,450 square feel of the old space and the 2,160 of new space and specify the exact number of new classrooms that will result from the construction. A So noted. 20, 15 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 25% 06/30/96 25% 06/30/96 25% Assoc Supt. for Desegregation. Desegregation Facilitator Assoc. Supt. for Desegregation. Desegregation Facilitator 10.3 Improvement Plans are developed and implemented. 10 4 Scheduled observations of Improvement Plans are documented. L J Program Seq 21 Program Name: Staff Development Program Code: 09 Primary Leader: Program Description: District Goal Support: Program Goal: [ Plan References: 1 LRSD FY 95-96 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader\nLucy Lyons Page: I Revision Date: November 6. 1995 staff development experiences. Goal No. 1. Implement integrated educational achieventeni. r. Additionally, this department will provide support and resources for site-based programs that will ensure that all students grow academically, socially and emotionally with emphasis Goal No. 2. Develop and maintain a staff that is well-trained and motivated. on bask skills arxl academic ennchment while closing disparities in Goal No. 3. The Little Rock School Board, administration, suff. and students will demonstrate behavior understanding of muliiculniral diversity. and human relations skills that value people as human beings and that are consistent with Goal No. 5. Provide a safe and orderly climate that is conducive to learning for all smdenu final Ua .1...__\n..._____ .... ..... Goal No. 6. Ensure dial equity occurs in all phases of school activities and operalions. The Staff Development Department will provide activities that will promote the implementation of the desegregation plan resulting in improved academic achievement. In support of the goal of providing onyning staff development and information L 126-128 an appreciation and means: Update skills of all district staff on 3 [ FY Program Budget: YTD Expenditures: $448,983.75 $78,332.41 1st Qtr Expend: 2nd Qtr Expend: $78,332.41 3rd Qtr Expetsd: 4th Qtr Expend: [ Related FurKlion Codes: 21, 1 JProgram Seq 21 Program Name: Staff Development Program Code: 09 Program Goal: Plan Reference Page Number L 126 L 126 LI26 LRSD FY 9S-96 PROGRAM BUDGET tXKUMENT Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: To provide staff develo|Mnen( to improve race relations and equity. (To provide suff development activities that will promote the implementation of the desegregation plan resulting in improved acidemic achievement.) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Page: 2 Revision Dale: Lucy Lyons Responsibility November 6. 1995 Evaluation Criteria 1. To provide staff development inservice to improve race relations and equity 1.1 Continue to articulate vision/mlssion of LRSD to community 1.2 Schedule and implement workshops and activities related (o improving race relations for the following groups: a. Board of Directors b. District Administrators c. Certified Staff d. District Support Staff 21, 2 (07/01/95) Fall 1988 (07/01/95) 1988-89 Schoo) Year (07/01/95) (06/30/96) Ongoing (06/30/96) Ongoing (06/30/96) (Superintendent. Staff Development, Central Office Staff) Superintendent (Central Office. Director of Communications) Deseg. Asst. Center (DAC) and Central Office Staff (Staff Development Department. Principals) 10 1.0 1.0 Lt II 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 (Increased minority staff representation in areas needed) (Increased representation of minority students in programs currently under-represented) (Administration of Human Relations Survey will reflect improvement in race relations and equity) Public participation Dissemination of material (Increase in number of students remming to public school) (School District's required Annual Report to Community will include mission/goals for LRSD) Roster of participants (Increased minority staff representation in areas needed) (Increased representation of minority students in programs currently under-represented) (Administration of Human Relations Survey will reflect improvement in race relations and equity) 1 J Program Seq if: 21 Page: 3 Program Name: Staff Development Revision Dale: November 6. 1995 Program Code: 09 Primary Leader: Program Goal: To provide staff development to improve race relations and eouity /Tn ...rr J______ . .... J Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Lucy Lyons (To provide staff development activities that will promote the implementation of the desegregation plan resulting in improved academic achievement.) Plan Reference Page Number L126 LI26 L 126 2. L 126 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1.3 1.3 1.4 Provide inservice on cooperative learning strategies in a heterogeneous classroom Plan and implement an evening symposium for the community on \"Community Involvement in a Desegregated School Setting\" (Item completed in April and August. 1988, and is not recurring) Monitor implementation of above strategies 2.1 Inservice teachers and administration on cooperative learning based on Slavin and Johnson and Johnson (or other appropriate cooperative learning models) 21. 3 Fail 1988 Fall 1988 (07/01/95) (07/01/95) July 1991 (07/01/95) Fall 1988 Ongoing (06/30/96) (06/30/96) Ongoing (06/30/96) DAC Consultant Assoc Supt for Educational Prog (Superintendent. District Biracial Committee) (Staff Development Department, Content Area Supervisors) Staff Dev Dept Content Area Supvs 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.4 14 2.0 Roster of participants (Symposium was held in April and August. 1988) Meetings held (Anendance at public meetings) (District-wide Biracial Monitoring Repon will reflect improvement in minority representation in all areas needed) (Increased involvement in group activities in the classroom) 2.0 (Improved classroom climate and social interactions among all students) 2.1 Training model 2.1 (Increased involvement in gniup activities in the classroom) 2.1 (Improved classroom climate and social interactions among all students)Wg*. Program Seq *: 21 Revision Dote\nNovember 6. 1995 Program Name: Staff Development Program Code: 09 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Lucy Lyons Program Goal: To provide staff development to bnprove race relations and equity. (To provide suff development activities that will promote the implementation of the desegregation plan resulting in improved academic achievement.) Plan Reference Page Number L126 L 126 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria L 126 2.2 Monitor teachers' use of cooperative learning strategies (07/01/95) (06/30/96) Principal (Staff Development Department. Content Area Supervisors) 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 Classroom observation and documentation (Random observation of classrooms where teachers have been trained) (Random survey of cooperative learning participants regarding effects of implementation in (heir classrooms) (PriiKipal will observe cooperative learning strategies during routine classroom visitations) 3.0 Provide inservice on additional strategies to improve instruction in desegregated school setting (To improve instruction through the use of effective teaching strategies in (he school setting) 3.1 Provide inservice opportunities on: a. Effective Schools Model PET b. Teachlng/Leaming Styles c. Teacher Expectations and Student Achievement (itSA) d. Classroom Marugement e. (and/or other appropriate inservice opportunities) A. Classroom Management * J.A. Fair 21, 4 (07/01/95) July 1991 (07/01/95) 08/15/95 (06/30/96) Ongoing (06/30/96) 08/15/95 (Staff Development. Content Area Supervisors) Staff Dev Dept (Content Area Supervisors) 3.0 3.1 3.1 (Increase in achievement of students of teachers in tdentified programs) Roster of participants Workshop evaluations (Number of participanls from a cross-section of district staff involved in the identified programs) Program Seq #: 21 P.|e: 5 Program Name: Staff Development Revision Dale: November 6. 1995 Program Code: 09 Primary Leader: Program Goal: Sterling Ingram Plan RefereiKe Page Number L 127 L127 To provide staff development to improve race relations and equity. (To provide staff development activities that will Secondary Leader: Lucy Lyons Objectives promote die implememaiioo of die desegregaiion plan resulting In improved academic achievement ) Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 4.0 Provide inservice on \"EITectlve Impkmentation of the LRSD DiscIpUne Management System\" 3J Send selected staff to professional development sessions in order to increase the number of available trainers and in return for a commitment to assist with collegial staff development. 13 Provide district-wide program of staff development 4.1 Continue to involve counselors, principals, assistant principals, and teachers in discipline management in a desegregated school setting 21, 5 07/01/95 07/01/95 (07/01/95) July 1991 (07/01/95) 06/30/96 06/30/96 (06/30/96) Ongoing (06/30/96) (Director of Pupil Personnel) Director of Pupil Services (Pupil Services Department. Principals. Counselors) 4.0 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.1 (Decrease in the number of students who receive disciplinary sanctions) (Decrease in the dispruportionaie number of minority students who receive disciplinary sanctions) Roster of participants (Building Level Discipline Management Plans established for all schools) (Counseling classes will include orientation to the building level plan and distrkl-wide Rights and Responsibilities Handbook)Pate. 6 Program Seq #: 21 Revision Date: November 6. 1995 Program Name: Staff Development Program Code: 09 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Lucy Lyons Program Goal: To provide staff development to improve race relations arwl equity. (To provide staff development activities that will promote the implementation of the desegregation plan resulting in improved academic achievement.) Plan ReferetKe Page Number L127 L 127 L 127 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Dale Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 4.2 Monitor use of discipline management system Fall 1988 (07/01/95) Ongoing (06/30/96) PriiKipals Counselors School Teams 4.2 4,-2 4.2 4.2 Documentation (Quarterly Behavior Management Reports) (Building level biracial committee reports will be used to monitor and/or adjust discipline plans) (District-wide Biracial Committee) 5.0 Provide PAL (Academic Support) teachers with strategies for planning and delivering more than one type of instructional grouping (To provide academic support teachers with strategies for planning and delivering more (han one type of instructional grouping) (07/01/95) (06/30/96) (Assoc. Superintendent. Academic Support Supervisors, Content Area Supervisors. Staff Development) 5.0 5.0 5.0 (Increase in achievement for all students in Academic Support Programs) (Decrease in achievement gap in representative population) (Decrease in number of students requiring academic support services) 5.1 Continue to investigate and research sources of strategies, models and activities of successful small artd large group instructional practices within heterogeiwus classes 21. 6 Fall 1988 (07/01/95) Ongoing (06/30/96) Assoc Supt for Educational Prog (Staff Deveiopmeni Department. Content Area Supervisors, Academic Support Supervison) S.l 5.1 Identification of sources (Provide staff with information from current research monthly) Program Seq #: 21 Par: 7 Program Name: Staff Development Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Code: 09 Primary Leader: Program Goal: Sterling Ingram Plan Reference Page Number L127 L 127 L 127 To provide staff development to improve race relations and equity. (To provide suff development activities that will Secondary Leader: Lucy Lyons Objectives promote the implementation of the desegregation plan resulting in improved academic achievement.) 6.0 Provide inservice to assist principal and faculties with strategies for promoting student achievement and growth Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 5.2 Conduct workshop to address the following: a. grouping theory and strategies b. demonstration of strategies for varied instruction Fall 1988 (07/01/95) (07/01/95) A. fi Principals' Institute Nuts and Bolts 6.1 Continue to provide inservice for priiKipak methods for developing their school improvement plan on 07/17/95 07/21/95 FaU 1988 (07/01/95) 21. 7 Fall 1988 (06/30/96) (06/30/96) 07/18/95 08/04/95 Ongoing (06/30/96) Supervisor of Math and English (Content Area Supervisors. Staff Development Depanrrwnt) (Asst. Superintendent. Planning. Research and Evaluation. Suff Development. Content Area Supervison) Div of Schools Eval and Testing IRC Specialists (Asst. Superintendents) S.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 6.0 6.0 6.1 6.1 6.1 Written evaluation by participants (Increase in achievement for all students in Academic Suppnn Programs) (Decrease in achievement gap in represenutive population) (Decrease in number of students requiring academic support services) (Principal will observe through classroom observations and teacher conferences) (Increase in achievement for ail students) (Decrease in achievement gap in represenutive population) Comprehensive and accurate product (Number of workshops in Integrating the Curriculum. Literature-based Instruction. Authentic Assessment and/or other relevant methodologies) (Better school improvement plans are submitted)PaV: 8 Program Seq f: 21 Revision Date: Novembet 6. 1995 1 Program Name: Staff Development Program Code: 09 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Lucy Lyons Program Goal: To provide staH development to Improve race relations and equity. (To provide staff development activities that will promote (he implementation of the desegregation plan resulting in improved academic achievement.) Plan Reference Page Number L127 L127 L 128 LI28 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 6.2 6.3 6.4 7.0 Form tri-district committee for collaborative procedures Continue to assist principals in revising school improvement |rians through the analysis of disaggregated data Continue to provide special school-based program and content area inservice meetings scheduled on a regular basis with specific sessions on content methodology and interpersonal relations for program implementation in a desegregated setting To provide special assistance for teachers as requested. 7.1 Establish tri-district committee 21, 8 July 1991 (07/01/95) 1991 School Year (07/01/95) 07/01/95 July 1, 1991 (07/01/95) July 1. 1991 Ongoing (06/30/96) Ongoing (06/30/96) 06/30/96 Ongoing (06/30/96) Ongoing Assoc and Asst Su pts Staff Dev Dept Content Area Supervisors Principals (Directors of Staff Development from LRSD. PCSSD. and NLRSD) (Directors of Staff Development from LRSD. PCSSD. and NLRSD) 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.3 6.3 6.3 7.0 7.0 7.1 7.1 Comfdeted plans (Provide written feedback and opportunities for sharing *What Works\" in various building-level plans) (Plans reflect strategies that evolved from disaggregated data) Workshop agendas and evaluations (A computer based compilation of individual employees/school-widc suff development activities will be available) (Student achievement will increase\ndisparity gap in represenutive population will decrease) Ongoing analysis (Tri-districi workshops will be held) Ongoing analysis (Tri-district committee was forTTKd in August. 1991)Program Seq #: 2] Page: 9 Program Name: Staff Development Revision Dale: November 6, 1995 Program Code: 09 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Program Goal: Secondary Leader: To provide staff development to improve race relations and equfty. (To provide staff development activities that will promote the implementation of the desegregation plan resulting in improved academic achievement.) Lucy Lyons L128 L128 Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date CtHnpletlon Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria L 128 A. Tri-district-PCSSD B. Tri-district-NLR 7.2 Meet four times per year, Iwo times each semester. The committee functions will be (o identify and implement staff development strategies that will assist the districts in fulfilling expectations of \"maintaining quality\" desegregated school districts. 7.3 Plan any activities appropriate for collaboration, e.g., community meetings, etc. A. Tri-disirici Classroom Management Grant 09/13/95 09/19/95 (07/01/95) 07/01/95 (07/01/95) 09/22/95 09/13/95 09/19/95 (06/30/96) 06/30/96 (06/30/96) 09/22/95 8.0 Provide staff development comporrent for effective staff development in desegregated school setting (07/01/95) (06/30/96) 21. 9 (Directors of Staff Development from LRSD. PCSSD. and NLRSD) (Directors of StaO\" Development from LRSD. PCSSD. and NLRSD) (Board of Directors, Superintendent Director of Staff Development) 7.2 7.3 8.0 (Record of meetings and collaborative nature of areas addressed) (Documentation of number of activities among the three districts) (Gather and analyze data from school district participants on the effectiveness of the staff development activities designed to address their speciftc needs)PCC: 10 Program Seq f: 21 Revision Date: November 6. 1995 Program Name: Staff Development Program Code: 09 Primary Leader: Sterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Lucy Lyons Program Goal: To provide staff development to improve race relations and equity. (To provide staff development activities that will promote the implementation of the desegregation plan resulting in improved academic achievement.) Plan Reference Page Number L124 L124 LI 24 LI24 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1 8.1 Establish staff development component a. Staff Development Dept Personnel b. Staff Development Office c. Staff Development Catalogue/Calcndar A. Staff Development Professional Library Catalog issued 8.2 Certified staff members (administrators and teachers) shall be trained to teach and counsel black and educationally-advantaged students. 8.3 The Little Rock School District will hire a five-member staff development team for this purpose. 8.4 The Little Rock School District Staff Development Department will be responsible for implementing the staff development services. 8.5 The staff development goals and programs currently used by the District, such as TESA, PET and others, will be continued, but a far more creative and comprehensive staff development program suitable for the needs of all employees and volunteers will be implemented. 21, 10 July 1991 July 1991 July 1991 (07/01/95) 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing 10/07/94 07/21/95 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 Board of Directors/Supt Human Resources Dir of Staff Dev 8.1 Implementation of Staff Development Dept Employment of Director, four specialists and one secretary 8.1a (Implementation of Staff Development Department in July. 1991) 8.1b Offke is operational 8.1b (Office was established in July. 1991 8.1c Distribution of catalogue/ calendar 8.1c (Staff Development Catalogue/Calendar distributed annually Program Seq #\n21 Page: It Program Name: Suff Development Revision Date: November 6. 1995 Program Code: 09 Primary Leader: Program Goal: Sterling Ingram To provide staff development to improve race rehtions and equity. Secondary Leader: Lucy Lyons (To provide saff developmenl eciivities Ihal will promole the implemenation of the desegregalion plan retiring in improved academic achievemenl.) Plan Reference Page Number L124 L124 LI24 L124 LI24 L124 LI25 L125 Objectives Strategies A. Classroom Management J.A. Fair 8,6 The districts will cooperate in designing a fresh and extended approach to suff development. Included in the planning will be community resource persons and all district personnel responsible for delivering training to suff, and to parent, volunteer, or student committees or groups, 8,7 Suff development will based upon certain basic principles of hutrun behavior, learning process and change dynamics. 8.8 The diverse training needs of suff at all employment levels will be met. 8,9 The District will esublish resource hanks which identify the training skills or specialized knowledge of employees and volunteers which can be shared through suff development activities, 8.10 Computer data bases will be used to record each employee's suff development history. 8-11 Carefully planned \"training of trainers' events will be actively used to expand in-house training expertise, 8.12 Interdistrict training activities will be frequently offered for groups of employees and LI 3 The District will deal decisively with the issue of racism and will involve all suff, snidents. and parents in a comprehensive preiudice reduction program 21. 11 Beginning Date Compleibn Dale Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 08/15/95 08/15/95 06/30/96 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96Program Seq f: 21 Program Name: Staff Development Ih*ogram Code: 09 Primary Leader\nSterling Ingram Secondary Leader: Pt*: 12 Revision Date: Lucy Lyons November 6, 1995 1 Program Goal: To provide staff development to improve race relations and equity. (To provide staff development activities that will promote the implementation of die desegregation plan resulting in improved academic achievement.) Plan Reference Page Number LI25 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Dale Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 8,14 Certain areas of training and staff development will be specially emphasized: utilization of volunteer resources, preparation of substitute teachers and aids. and training for parents. 07/01/95 06/30/96 21, 12Program Seq 22 lYogram Name: Library/Media Program Code: 32 Primary Leader: Program Description\nDistrict Goal Support: Program Goal: [ Plan References: FY Program Budget: YTD Expendttures: LRSD FY 95-96 PRCXjRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Dr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: Lucy Lyon Page: 1 Revision Dale: November 6, 1995 Each child in the Little Rock School District should be given access to his/her full measure of the instructional resources. Library/media services will be designed to provide for extension and enrichment of bask skills and will also accommodate the varied learning styles of students in different instructional groups. Because students will have opportunities to work and Icam in the library/media center under the direction of a trained teacher-librarian, they will be able to approach learning in a variety of ways, thus accommodating their individual styles and also providing for the additional 'time on task' or ennchment that many students need in order to internalize the material initially presented. The District s plan is to offer a library/media program to serve learners with diverse needs, background and abilities through a comprehensive program designed to better support Disirkt goals and student needs with regard to learning styles, relevance of instruction, support of multkultural school curriculum, and the appikation of learning to real-life situations. Library/media servkes will be designed to provide for extension and enrkhment of bask skills and will also accommodate the varied learning styles of students in different instructiortal groups. Students will have opportunilks to work and learn in the library/media center under the direction of a trained teacher-librariatL.The Little Rock School Distrkt's library/media program will fulfill its potential as an essential contributor to the Distrkt's successful desegregation plan. Upon implementation of the elementary program a revkw of the secondary program will commerKe with special attention being given to meeting the interests and needs of the Distrxi's diverse population. Goal #1 - Implement integrated educatiorul programs that will ensure that all students grow academkally, socially and emotionally with emphasis on basic skills and academk enrkhment while closing disparities in achievement. Goal #2 - Develop and maintain a staff that is well-trained and motivated. Goal #3 - The Little Rock School Board, administration, staff, and students will demonstrate in their day to day behavior that they accept each individual as a valued contributor to sockty to sockty and view cultural diversity among students, staff and the community as a valued resource upon whkh our community and nation can draw as we prepare for the 21 st Century. Goal \u0026lt;6 - Ensure that equity occurs in all phases of school activities and operations. The district will provide each student with library/media servkes tn accordance with the essential role outlined in the districts Desegregation Plan. L 106. L 107, L 109, L 110 $409,808.64 $32,881.28 1st Qtr Expend\n$32,881.28 3rd Qtr Expend: FTE 16 2nd Qtr Expend: 4(h Qtr Expend: I Related Function Codes: ] 22, 1LRSD FY 95-96 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Paie: 1 1 Program Seq #: 22 Revtston Date: November 6. 1995 Program Name: Library/Media Program Code: 32 Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams SecoiMlary Leader: Lucy Lyon Program Goal: The district will provide each student with libraryZmedia services in accordance with the essential role outlined in (he district's Desegregation Plan Plan RefereiKe Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria LI09 1. Implement (be districts proposed new elementary Ubrary/medla program. (07/01/95) (06/30/96) (Coordinator of Library Services, Principals. Librarians) 1. Comparison of survey results 1988-1993 will show ItKreased use. L106 1. (To provide equitable access to library resources including multicultural and audiovisual resources for all studenb.) 1. Comparison of data collected monthly will show\nStudent vbib will Increase. Volume of books checked out will increase. Independent research by students will be documented to show use. Number of classes/groups scheduled by teachers will be documented to show use. L109 L109 L109 1.4 Order equipment and materiab necessary iiKluding AV software. (Determine/purchase core materials needed for each elementary school.) 1.7 Conduct inservice and curriculum development for classes for librarians, principab, and teachers. Library media specialists will provide Inservice training to buiidint-level staff In the use of materlab and equipment. 1.8 Process new material iiKluding cataloging. 1.10 Schedule nims\\videos as possible. (Schedule videos correlated to LRSD curriculum as requested by teachers. Use of 16mm film u outdated.) 22, 2 (07/01/95) 07/01/95 07/01/95 (07/01/95) (06/30/96) 06/30/96 06/30/96 (06/30/96) Supv of Inst Tech, Coor of Lib Services, (Librarians) Consuhant, Supv of Inst Tech, Coor and Advisory Committee Librarians, Media Staff Supv of Inst Tech (Coor Lib Serv) 1.4 Purchase orders (Materials supporting the curriculum will be used in each elementary school.) 1.7 (Agendas and memos) (Agendas and memos on file in Dept, of Instructional Technology.) 1.8 Completion memo 1.10 Schedule (Videos correlated to curriculum will be used in each school.)P\u0026gt;(e: 3 Program Seq #: 22 Revbion Date: November 6. 1995 Program Name: Libra ry/Media Program Code: 32 Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: Lucy Lyon Ih-ogram Goal: The district will provide each student with library/mcdia services in accordance with the essential role outlined in the district's Desegregation Plan Plan Reference Page Number LIIO LIIO LIIO LI09 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria A. Videos are scheduled daily and were current on 09/30/95 1.11 Hire full-time librarians and full-time clerks for each elementary school as needed. A. Full-time librarians and clerks staffed based on Little Rock School District formula. 1.12 Develop a maintenance proposal which assures prompt and efficient repair of all AV equipment irulependent of the time of year. (Maintain procedures for prompt and efficient repair of AV equipment.) A. First quarter repair record\n132 AV machines and 15 computers 1.13 Notify teachers via librarians of the fall schedule (films/videos). (Instructional videos correlated to LRSD curriculum are scheduled. Use of 16mm film is outdated.) 1.14 Supply nims/vtdeos per schedule. A. Videos supplied on weekly basis 22, 3 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 09/01/95 25% 06/30/96 09/30/95 06/30/96 25% 06/30/96 06/30/96 25% Dir of Human Serv, Supv of Inst Tech, Coor Lib Serv, PritKipats Supv of Inst Tech (Coor Lib Serv) Supv of Inst Tech (Coor Lib Serv) Supv of Inst Tech (Coor Lib Serv) 1.11 Contracts (Sufficient staff will be in place to meet state and North Central Standards for librarians. Library clerks will be staffed according to LRSD formula, based on enrollment.) 1.12 Copy of proposal Ninety percent of equipment sent in will be repaired within a week. 1.13 File copy (Videos correlated to the curriculum will be used in each school.)- 1.14 Weekly delivery (Videos correlated to curriculum will showProgram Seq f: 22 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Library/Media Program Code: 32 Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: Lucy Lyon Program Goal: The district will provide each student with library/media services in accordance with the essential role outlined in the district's Desegregation Plan Plan Reference Page Number LUO L106 L107 L107 L107 L107 Objectives Strategies Beginning Dale Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 2. (To extend and enrich the bask skills in ways that meet students varied learning styles and promote life long learning.) 1.15 Develop a seven to ten year AV equipment purchase jdan based on accepted life spans for equipment and equity considerations. The goal is to devise a plan which will provide the district with consistent line item cost each year to simplify budgetary platming atKl prevent the necessity for torge one*timc expenditures as is now required 1.17 Conduct inservice for librarians and library clerks. A. Inservice conducted for librarians and library clerks 2.5 Library media specialists will plan with classroom teachers for materials needed for classroom units. 2.6 Library media specialists will plan with classroom building staff for at least one school -wide reading motivation activity each year. 2.7. Library media specialists will plan with classroom teachen for library instruction to be correlated to classroom instruction. 2.8 Library media specialists will instruct students in literary skills and reference/study skills. 22, 4 Sept. 5, 1989 (07/01/95) 07/01/95 08/10/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/9\nNov. 1, 1989 (06/30/96) 06/30/96 25% 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 Supv of Inst Tech Coor of Lib Serv Librarians PritKipals, Librarians Principals. Librarians Principals. Librarians Principals. Librarians Principals. Librarians 1.15 Copy of plan (Copy of plan on file in Department of Instructional Technology.) Agertdas (Quarterly data will reflect an increase in library use.) 2. (As a result of increased planning and instruction by LM Specialist, test scores will increase on norm and criterion-referenced lesu.) 2.1 (Improved planning with teachers will irKrease student tests scores.) 2.2 (More books will be checked out in each school.) 2.3 (Improved planning with teachers will result in higher achievement for students.) 2.4 (Abacus assessment will show mastery of reference/study skills.) i Page: 5 Program Seq Ki 22 Revision Dale: November 6. 1995 Program Name: Library/Media Program Code: 32 Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: Program Goal: Lucy Lyon The district will provide each student with library/media services in accordance with the essential role outlined in the district's Desegregation Plan Plan RefererKe Page Ntonber Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 133 1. The selection of malerlals/resources to support the curriculum in desegregated school districts is a multi-district goal of the library media programs. 1.1 Continue hosting Muhl-District, Multicultural Resource Sharing Pair. In the future, the fair site will rotate among (he three districts. A. Tri-district meeting held to discuss fair 1.2' Begin hostint Mulii-Distnct Resource Sharing Fair with book arxl AV materials, vendors, rotating the site among the three districts. 133 2. The inservice training library media staff members to desegregated school districts Is a multidistrict goal of the library media programs. 2.1 Plan to host muHi-dlstrict inservice meetings such as the one sponsored by the Pulaski County Educational Service Cooperative in April of 1988 to explain the new national guidelines for school library media program planning. A. Planning meeting held for tri-disirkt inservice Annually 07/13/95 07/01/95 Ongoing 07/13/95 Ongoing 07/13/95 06/30/96 Ongoing 07/13/95 2.2 Plan to host inservice training for muHi-district library media specialists using district employees. 07/01/95 Ongoing 134 134 3. Utilization of television technology in desegregated school districts is a multi-district goal of the library media programs. 3.1 Implement utilization of cable chaimel 19 and/or videotapes produced at Metro to teach basis skills, etc. 07/01/95 Tobe established 4. Recruitment of minority Library Media Specialists in desegregated school districts Is a multidistrict goal of library media programs. 4.1 Contact teachers training inslHutions/recruit teachers for training programs In library media ccrtincation. Ongoing Ongoing 22, 5 Library Media Director or responsible person (including NRLSD) Library Media Directors or responsible person (including NLRSD) Library Media Directors or responsible person Library Media Directors or responsible person (including NLRSD Resources will be selected, purchased, and utilized by teachers and students as they leach the curriculum of the desegregated school districts. Inservice training will develop skills for library medial specialists who work in desegregated school districts Students will gain practical vocational experience in running a television studio\nstudents will benefit from instructional units provided over cable system or recorded for later classroom use Hiring and placenteni of minority media specialists will occur6 Program Seq f: 22 Revbion Date: November 6. 1995 1 Program Name: Libra ry/Media Program Code: 32 Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams SecoiMlary Leader: Lucy Lyon Program Goal: The district will provide each student with library/media services in accordance with the essential role outlined in the district's Desegregation Plan 134 Plan RefereiKe Page Number L108 L108 L108 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 5. Multi-district communication for library media program administrators is a goal for the programs. 7. Library media specialist will annuaUy evaluate the collection for adequacy of multicultural materials and will continually evaluate new materials to be coiKidered for purchase. 8. Recommendations for multkuhural materials will be shared with all principals and Ubrariarts and recommended for core purchase for all schools. 9. The 1992-92 school year will be used to establish baseline data for determining progress. 10. Undertake a comparative study of library resources among the incentive schools as well as other schoob of comparable size to bring about parity of holdings through an equitable purchasing policy. 5.1 Copy memos relating staff development opportunities to other district administrators. 5.2 Meet informally for sharing sessions. A. Tri-districi sharing meeting held 22, 6 Ongoing 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/13/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 Ongoing 06/30/96 06/30/96 07/13/95 06/30/96 06/30/96 06/30/96 Library Media Directors or responsible person (including NLRSD) Better communication will be achievedp\u0026gt;e: 7 Program Seq #: 22 Revision Date: November 6. 1995 Program Name: Library/Media Program Code: 32 Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: Lucy Lyon Program Goal: The district will provide each student with library/media services in accordance with the essential role outlined in the district's Desegregation Plan Plan Reference Page Nisnber Objectives Strategies Beginning Dale Completion Dale Responsibility Evatualion Criteria 11. Modify building space to Increase bbrarv capacities at Mitchell arid Garland. Puree the shelves of outdated and well-wom materials. At Mitchell, books most frequently used by the four- year old program, kindergarten, and first grades could be permanently placed in the individual classrooms since those grades are all housed tn structures that are detached from the main building. 07/01/95 06/30/96 22, 7Profratn Seq f: 23 LRSP FY 9S-96 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Page: Revision Date: November 6. 1995 Program Name: Computerized Transportation Routing System Program Code: 24 Primary Leader: Fred Smith Secondary Leader: Mary Jane Cheatham Program Description: Transportation system provides the means for students to have access to various school options and educational programs, as well as extracurricular activities. The District will continue to use its automated routing system to make efficient use of district resources in providing transportation to those students eligible for transportation. Students shall be provided transportation in order to attend their assigned schools and its programs and activities. District Goal Support: Ensure that equity occurs in all phases of school activities and operations. Program Goal: To provide safe, efficient, and reliable transportation for the students of the Little Rock School District. [ Plan References: L227 I FY Program Budget: $6,800.00 1st Qtr Expend: $0.00 3rd Qtr Expend: FTEO YTD Expenditures: $0.00 2nd Qtr Expend: 4th Qtr Expend: Related Function Codes: 23, 1 I LRSD FY 95-96 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Page: 2 Program Seq *: 23 Revbion Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name\nComputerized Transportation Routing System Program Code: 24 Primary Leader: Fred Smith Secondary Leader\nMary Jane Cheatham Program Goal: To provide safe, efficient, and reliable transportation for the students of the Little Rock School District. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibllfty Evaluation Criteria L227 L227 1.0 The Transportation Department will request additional resources to help provide transportation support for evening arKf extertded day programs. 1.1 In 1990-91 the District reduced its ntenber of runs from three to two. 1.2 LRSD has made progress In the utilization of the ECOTRAN MAPNET System...1988-89 school opening. 1.3 There is extensive work to be done In updating dw geographic files, table with the LRSD database. 1.0 Determine resource requirements necessary to support programs and procure them. Provide transportation support as required. A. Resource requirements identified in 1994-95 and ordered. Buses (26) received in September 1995 for immediate use. B. Contract with Laidlaw Transit identified need for 39 additionai buses for 1995-96 school year. Buses (39) provided by Laidlaw to start the school year. 1.1 Procure resources necessary Io support two run system and implement two run system. A. The number of routes are limited by the number of buses available to insure a two run system. 1.2 Student and geographic data loaded in system, and personnel trained and proficient in computerizing routing. A. Item completed 6/90 and is not recurring. 1.3 A cooperative effort between Transportation Department, LR City Engineers, Student Assignment, and ECOTRANS staff will help to ensure that software reflects accurate geographic information. A. An new streets are added Io the map. As new streets are added the map is updated. 23, 2 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 09/18/95 08/21/96 06/30/96 08/21/95 06/30/96 06/30/96 90% Director of Transportation Director of Transportation Director of Transportation Director of Transportation, Director of Information Services 1.0 Adequate service provided in support of programs. Determined by dividing number requested by number provided. 1.1 All buses assigned only two routes 1.2 Students effectively and efficiently routed to facilitate a smooth school opening 1988-69. 1.3 Significant reduction in street address errors introduced by poor/inadequate data entry.Program Seq : 23 Pbq-. 3 Revision Date*. November 6, 1995 Program Name: Computerized Transportation Routing System Program Code: 24 Primary Leader: Fred Smith Secondary Leader: Mary Jane Cheatham Program Goal: To provide safe, efficient, and reliable transportation for the students of the Little Rock School District. Plan RefererKe Page Number L227 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1.4 School attendance areas and updated walk zones need to be er\u0026gt;coded into map files. 1.5 (Transportation Safety Policies need to be reviewed and updated property. Changes will be Incorporated from Applicable Board Policies and Administrative Directives). 1.6 (Assignment promotion population region tables need to be created to ensure proper student assignment). 1.4 School attendance areas not initiated. Walk zones encoded Into map for maximum bus utilization. A. Walk zones are reviewed and updated. 1.5 A comprehensive review of all LRSD policies germane Io transportation must be performed and recommendations/changes reduced to writing and incorporated into applicable documents. A. A review of all school board policies, department practices and procedures is conducted. Changes in any policies will be recommended to to the school board 1.6 Information downloaded from mainframe on media format compatible with HP Vectra. A Initial download from Data Processing completed. 23, 3 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 06/30/96 75% 06/30/96 10% 06/30/96 08/01/95 Director of Transportation Director of Transportation Director of Transportation 14 No student required Io exceed four block/six block walk. 1.5 Published policies on student behavior/safety on LRSD buses. Published policies for drhrers/driver aides to assist in communicating the district's position on transportation safety procedures. Frequent meetings to address safety issues and concerns Attendance verified through sign-in sheets. Review of supervisor's monitoring report. 1.6 Routes generated based upon current assignment information. Page: Program Seq *: 23 Revision Date: 1 Novembers. 1995 Program Name: Computerized Transportation Routing System Program Code: 24 Primary Leader: Fred Smith Secondary Leader: Mary Jane Cheatham Program Goal: To provide safe, efficient, and reliable transportation for the students of the Little Rock School District Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1.7 All school attendance areas will be encoded Into the geographic tables. Corresporxling walk zones will be generated for schools, all transportation policies will be reviewed and updated. 1.6 An entire new stop network will be gerterated to improve efficiency and most economically utilize District resources. 1.7 Walk zones established in accordance with district policy and software criteria selection. 1.6 Transportation staff will update and revise all routes based upon census data provided by Information Services. A. Additional census information is included when it is available to the Transportation Department 23, 4 07/01/95 07/01/95 08/21/95 06/30/96 06/30/96 10% Director of Transportation 1.7 Two mile list published and distributed to school staff. Add transportation policies and procedures. 1.6 Written request for student data forwarded. Census incremental initiated by routing supervisor Research system error listing to within 5%. Completion of first day routes prior Io registration.Program Seq *: 24 Program Name: Dau Processing Program Code: 17 Program Description: District Goal Support: Program Goal: [ Plan ReferetKes: FY Program Budget: YTD Expenditures: LRSD FY 95-96 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams To provide the resources (Hardware, Software. Training. Programming, Computer Operations, and Hardware and Software Secondary Leader: David Beason Page: I Revidon Date: November 6. 1995 Support) necessary to collect, store and report information on LRSD smdenu. Information ...ill___J .U . .-----------o. --...r -r------------------ ..M JVHwaic ouppun\nlo ana intoi Services will provide the computer resources necessary to collect, store, and report student information in a timely and accurate manner. School and central office-based suff accurate UD-IO-dare inmmufmn nn eti4nte * up-to-date information on students. parents, and studenu will benefit from To implement integrated educational programs to ensure that all studenu will grow academically, socially and emotionally with emphasis on basic skills and academic enrichment while closing disparities in achievement. necessary information required by ouUide inieresu. To provide timely response to all requesu for information. s^den. T0.pn,.e sports retired , sdppcn school ce.l ofl-c h.scd fooclioos. To provide all L129. LI30 ] $717,087.08 1st Qtr Expend: $601,721.29 3rd Qtr Expend: $601,721.26 FTE 5 2nd Qtr Expend: 4th Qtr Expend: [ Related Function Codes: ] 24, 1LRSD FY 95-96 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Program Seq 24 Program Name: Data Processing Program Code: 17 Primary Leader: Dr. Hervy Williams Secondary Leader: Psge: 2 Revision Date: David Beason November 6, 1995 Program Goal: To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student information. To provide all necessary reports required to support school aixl central office based functions. To provide all necessary Information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to all requests for Information. Plan Reference Page Number L 129/130 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1. Data Processing (Information Services Department) wH) provide the necessary support for all school and central office- based furKtions. 07/01/95 06/30/96 Director of Information Services 1.A (Administration has received all required reports for the school year). 1 C (Quality reports are being delivered on time). L 129 L 129 1.1 Programs will be developed and implemented relative to the following areas: (Collect. Store, and Report) Dropout Statistics (to include the abHity to generate data by race, gender, grade on a school by school as wen as District-wide basis). Set up 96 enroll/drops on Enroll History Screen for Henderson Jr High. Produce report showing Drop Select Absence Reason Codes and Change Records for Assistant Superinter\u0026gt;dent. 24. 2 07/01/95 07/01/95 09/14/95 09/19/95 06/30/96 06/30/96 09/25/95 09/26/95 Director of Information Services 1 D (Complaints are no longer being received about information rK\u0026gt;t being available). 1.1 (Reports are available which accurately report dropout statistics).3 Pegs: Program Seq #: 24 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Data Processing Program Code: 17 Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams Secorxiary Leader: David Beason Program Goal: To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student information. To provide all necessary reports required to support school and central office based functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to all requests for information. Plan Reference Page Number Obiectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1.2 (Score. Collect, Store, and Report) Test Scores (to include capacity to score tests and to generate data by race, gender, grade, school, subject area, and districtwide). 07/01/95 06/30/96 Director of Information Services 1.2 (Ail test results are stored in the computer and are reflected in pertinent reports). Uploaded Stanford 8 scores to the AS/400 for PRE. Produced 13 copies of Hall Summer School Grade Report for Assistant Superinterrdent. Produced report showing SAT scores of 35.5 and below for 7th graders at Southwest. Produced report showing SAT scores less than 35 for Central High. Produced report showing SAT scores less than and equal to 35.8 for McClellan High. Produced report for PRE of non-hippy students with test scores 1987-1994 for PRE. Printed Standford Forms for PRE. 07/01/95 07/13/95 07/19/95 07/20/95 07/26/95 OB/23/95 08/29/95 07/19/95 07/13/95 07/19/95 07/21/95 07/27/95 06/23/95 09/01/95 Produced Generic Test Scores Report Pulaski Heights Jr High. 24, 3 09/18/95 09/30/95 i1 I Page: Program Saq *: 24 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Data Processing Program Code: 17 Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: David Beason 4 Program Goal: To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student information. To provide all necessary reports required to support school and central office based functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to all requests for information. Plan Reference Page Number L 129 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1.3 (Collect, Store, and Report) Student Achievement Data (to Include the capacity to monitor test scores, grade distribution and other Identified achievement data by race, gertder. grade, subject, school and district-wide). Printed Grade Transcript Labels for Cloverdale Jr. Resolved problem with Student Request Verification Report SCH.588 for Parkview. Created diskette showing Dunbar Students FAR status. Produced report of students with math or reading scores of less than 35.8 for Federal Programs. Produced report of AP courses by race/sex counts for Pupil Services. Printed Grade Transcript Labels for Southwest Jr. Printed Grade Transcript Labels for Mann Jr. Produced report of Flat File of all Sth grade students for Henderson Jr High. Provided list of all Students by Grade for Southwest Jr High. 24, 4 07/01/95 07/25/95 08/02/95 08/02/95 08/14/95 08/14/95 08/15/95 08/30/95 09/08/95 09/13/95 06/30/96 08/03/96 08/03/95 08/16/95 08/15/95 08/20/95 08/24/95 08/30/95 09/20/95 09/13/95 Director of Information Services 1.3 (All available student achievement data is stored and reported as requested).Program Seq #: 24 Page: Revision Date: November 6. 1995 Program Name: Data Processing Program Code: 17 Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: David Beason 5 Program Goal: To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect arxJ sltffe all pertinent student information. To provide all necessary reports required to support school and central office based functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response lo all requests for information. Plan Reference Page Number L 130 Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1.4 (Collect, Store, and Report) Attendance (shall be kept in such a way as to allow data to be gathered for any period of time, for withdrawals and re-enrollment, for students by grade, school, race, gender, and \u0026lt;8strict-wide). 07/01/95 06/30/96 Director of Information Services 1.4 (Attendance data is accurately stored and reported to the state with minimum manual compilation. Provided list of students at Southwest that reside in a specified area. 07/01/95 07/17/95 Produced PRC Labels for Cloverdale Jr High. Produced mailing labels for Gibbs Magnet. Produced mailing labels for Pulaski Heights Jr. 07/19/95 07/19/95 07/26/95 07/20/95 07/19/95 08/04/95 Produced Summer School Report for Department of Education. 07/27/95 08/11/95 Produced mailing labels for Parkview High. 07/28/95 08/02/95 Produced student mailing labels for Dunbar Jr High. 07/28/95 08/02/95 Produced schedule cards for Hall High. 07/31/95 08/08/95 Produced parent mailing labels for Dunbar Jr High. 08/02/95 08/02/95 Produced parent mailing labels for Fair Park. Produced parent mailing labels for Central High. 24, 5 08/02/95 08/02/95 08/02/95 08/02/95 i 6 Page: Program Seq #\n24 Revision Data: November 6, 1995 I! Program Name: Data Processing Program Code: 17 Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: David Beason Program Goal: To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect arxi store all pertinent student information. To provide all necessary reports required to support school and central office based functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to all requests for information. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Begirming Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Critaria Produced parent mailirtg labels for Carver Magnet. Produced open house mailing labels for Parkview. Produced schedule cards for Hall High. Produced PRC labels for McClellan High. 08/02/95 08/02/95 08/07/95 08/08/95 08/02/95 08/08/95 08/08/95 08/10/95 Updated records to the Student Attendance Calendar for Student Assignment. 08/10/95 08/10/95 Produced student labels for Hall High. 08/11/95 08/11/95 Produced schedule cards for Cloverdale Jr High. Produced schedule cards for Central High. Produced schedule cards for Parkview High. Produced parent mailing labels for Hall High. Created diskette to update Enrollment for Transportation. Resolved problem with adding new Attendance Codes for Pulaski Heights Jr High. Produced Student ID Labels on Hall and Fair Park for Nurse's Office. Printed Schedule cards for all Secondary Secretaries. 24, 6 08/11/95 08/11/95 08/12/95 08/12/95 08/14/95 08/15/95 08/15/95 08/16/95 08/22/95 08/14/95 08/14/95 08/14/95 08/30/95 09/08/95 08/22/95 08/22/957 Page: Program Seq #: 24 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Data Processing Program Code: 17 Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: David Beason Program Goal: To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student information. To provide all necessary reports required to support school and central office based functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to all requests for information. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria Produced parent mailing labels for Jefferson. Prodeced parent mailing labels for Hall High. Produced student mailing labels for Hall High. Produced student mailing labels for J A Fair. Produced employee and student labels for IRC. Produced parent mailing labels for Pair Park. Produced parent mailir\u0026gt;g labels for Dunbar Jr. Conducted survey of Attendance Users problems for Information Services. Produced Attendance Report for number of absences on all dates and for all reasons by student and school absences for Assistant Superintendent. Produced parent mailing labels for Hall High. 08/21/95 08/21/95 08/23/95 08/23/95 08/23/95 08/23/95 08/23/95 08/25/95 06/25/95 08/25/95 06/21/95 08/21/95 08/24/95 06/24/95 08/24/95 08/23/95 08/23/95 08/31/95 09/06/95/ 06/25/95 Reprinted attendance scan forms for Cloverdale Jr. 08/25/95 06/25/95 Produced schedules on paper for J A Pair. Produced PRC labels for Parkview High. 08/28/95 08/29/95 08/30/95 08/29/95 Produced name /ID labels for Pulaski Heights Elem. 08/30/95 06/30/95 Produced student mailir\u0026gt;g labels for J A Pair. 09/01/95 09/01/95 24, 7 i8 Page: Program Seq f: 24 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Data Processing Program Code: 17 Primary Leader\nDr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: David Beason Program Goal: To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student information. To provide all necessary reports required to support school and central office based functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside Interests. To provide timely response to all requests for information. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibiilty Evaluation Criteria Produced Senior High Attendance Office Observation Report for Information Services. 09/01/95 09/07/95 Produced student labels for King Elementary. 09/06/95 09/06/95 Provided memo to schools regarding Attendance Report Updates for Information Services. 09/07/95 09/07/95 Produced scheduled cards for Central High. Produced student mailing labels for Hall High. 09/07/95 09/07/95 09/08/95 09/08/95 Produced PRC labels and parent mailing labels for Southwest Jr High. 09/08/95 09/11/95 Produced PRC labels for Mabelvale Jr High. Produced PRC labels for King Elementary. Produced labels for all students at Mann for PTA. 09/08/95 09/08/95 09/08/95 09/11/95 09/11/95 09/20/95 Produced student mailing labels for Mann Jr High. 09/08/95 09/08/95 Produced schedule cards for Forest Heights Jr. 09/08/95 09/08/95 Produced Attendance Report with Number Input and Date Range absences for Assistant Superintendent. Produced Attendance Report with Number Input and Date Range on all absences for Assistant Superintertdent. 24, 8 09/08/95 09/08/95 09/08/95 09/08/95Pag*: Program Seq #: 24 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Data Processing Program Code: 17 Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: David Beason 9 Program Goal: To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student information. To provide all necessary reports required to support school and central office based functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to all requests for information. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria Resolved problem with PFC labels to include Student SSN for Central High. Assisted with printing Attendance Letters Report for McDermott Elementary. Format diskettes for Attendance Scsnnir\u0026gt;g and upload programs for Southwest Jr High. Produced Attendance by Race Report for Mabelvale Elementary. Produced list of Junior's and Senior's Name. Address, and Phone for Communications. Produced Zoneblock labels for John A Riggs. Produced PTA mailing labels for Central High. Produced schedule cards lor Dunbar Jr High. Produced schedule cards for Hall High. Produced schedule cards for Forest Heights Jr. Produced schedule cards for J A Fair High. 09/08/95 09/08/95 09/11/95 09/11/95 09/13/95 09/14/95 09/14/95 09/15/95 09/15/95 09/15/95 09/15/95 75% 09/13/95 09/13/95 09/19/95 09/14/95 09/20/95 09/20/95 09/20/95 09/18/95 09/18/95 09/18/95 Produced list of Student information for McDermott. 09/18/95 09/19/95 Produced PRC labels for Dunbar Jr High. Produced student/parent labels for Cloverdale Jr. Produced schedule cards for Cloverdale Jr. 24, 9 09/18/95 09/18/95 09/18/95 09/18/95 09/18/95 09/18/95 i I Page: 10 Program Seq #: 24 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Data Processing Program Coda: 17 Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams Secorfdary Leader\nDavid Beason Program Goal: To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student information. To provide all necessary reports required to support school and central office based functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to all requests for information. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria L 130 Produced student mailing labels for Dunbar Jr. Created mailing labels by attendance zorte for McClellan High. Created diskette with Student Addresses for Communications Department. Produced schedule cards for Forest Heights Jr. Trained new Attendance personnel on Atteridance menus for Assistant Superintendent. Distributed memo regarding new Attendance Information to Attendance Secretaries. Produced Year-to-Date Absence Report for Communications. Produced schedule cards for McClellan High. 1.5 (Collect, Store, and Report) Disciplinary Data (by offense, school, teacher, class, subject, race, gender, district-wide, and over any period of tlmel. 09/18/95 09/19/95 09/20/95 09/20/95 09/20/95 09/21/95 09/21/95 09/22/95 07/01/95 09/18/95 50% 09/25/95 09/20/95 50% 09/27/95 09/25/95 09/22/95 06/30/96 Director of Information Services 1.5 (Discipline data is accurately entered and reported as required). Produced original and final Sanction Report for Student Hearing. 24, 10 07/01/95 07/13/95Pag\n11 Program Seq #: 24 Revision Dete: November 6, 1996 Program Name: Data Processing Program Code: 17 Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: David Beason Program Goal: To provide the progrems end data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student Information. To provide all necessary reports required to support school and central office based tunctions. lo provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to all requests for information. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies 8eginnir\u0026gt;g Data ComiMetion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria L 130 Produced End-of-Year Discipline Report for Student Hearing. Provided Forest Heights with the ability to run Student Discipline Reports. Researched Truancy Tracking for Judge Watts. Produced Truancy Report for rurmber of absences for Assistant SuperinterKient. Revised Logic data on TRUANT9 for Hall High School. 1.6 (Collect. Store, and Report) Student Assignment Data (by race. age. gender, class, school, grade, level, and district-wide). Provided exchange data on M to M's for PCSSD. Assisted with Master Scheduling for Secondary Schools. Conducted Student End-of-Year Promotion and Cleanup. Crested diskette and labels of M to M students for Transportation. Loaded Pupil Information Forms for Student Assignment. 24, 11 07/11/95 08/01/95 08/18/95 08/25/95 09/21/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/09/95 07/18/95 07/20/96 07/13/95 08/11/95 08/25/95 09/06/95 09/21/95 06/30/96 07/12/95 08/14/95 07/09/95 07/24/95 07/27/95 Director of Information Services 1.6 (Student assignment data is stored and all reporting requirements are met|. i Page: 12 Program Seq 24 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Data Processing Program Code: 17 Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: David Beason Program Qod: To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student information. To provide all necessary reports required to support school and central office based functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to all requests for information. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Data Responsibility Evaluation Criteria L 130 2.Data Processing Department (Information Services Department Staff) will have the capacity to respond to District needs as required by District goals and state and federal laws such as grade distribution and the ability to identify specific students and cohorts of students. Ran mailing labels on Badgett and Fair Park for Student Assignment. Assisted with Master scheduling on all secondary schools. Resolved problem for Student Assignment with Student Number different than Student ID. Rolled over Student Data into ABACUS for Instructional Technology. Restored Student and Family Information from 1994-95 for Student Assignment. Produced Student Address labels for select A/Z for Student Assignment. Produced list of Elementary students assigned to a homeroom teacher for Student Assignment. 24, 12 07/20/95 07/28/95 08/14/95 08/23/95 08/28/95 09/11/95 09/13/95 07/01/95 07/21/95 08/07/95 08/14/95 09/05/95 08/28/95 09/11/95 09/14/95 06/30/96 Director of Information Services 2. (The District requirements for computer resources are beir\u0026gt;g met|.Page: 13 Program Seq #: 24 Revision Date: November 6. 1995 Program Name: Data Processir\u0026gt;g Program Code: 17 Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: David Beason Program Goal: To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student information. To provide all rtecessary reports required to support school and central office based functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to all requests for information. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 2.1 (The Information Services Department will maintain adequate computer hardware and support to meet the needs of the district). 07/01/95 06/30/96 Director of Information Services 2.1 (All employees requiring access to student records have access to terminalsl. Installed additional cassette tape drive for AS/400. Setup AS/400 for Job Accounting to track CPU usage. Review new documentation for Student AS/400 update. Resolved problem with diskette drive in PC for Superintendent's Office. Resolved problem with diskette drive in PC for McClellan Hign.. Conducted NS Router File Transfer study for the AS/400. Review computer set-up at Metropolitan to provide additional Attertdance Training. Resolved problem on printer at Pulaski Heights Jr. Resolved problem on printer in Human Resources. Installed new tape drive to the AS/400. Resolved problem on printer at Parkview High. 24, 13 07/01/95 07/05/95 07/21/95 08/02/95 08/02/95 08/18/95 08/22/95 08/25/95 08/30/95 09/05/95 09/06/95 07/21/95 08/24/95 07/31/95 08/08/95 08/07/95 08/31/95 08/24/95 08/25/95 08/30/95 09/11/95 09/07/95 Pag*: 14 Program Seq #: 24 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Data Processing Program Code: 17 Primary Leader: Dr. Hervy Williams Secondary Leader: David Beason Program Goal: To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student information. To provide all necessary reports required to support school and central office based functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to all requests for information. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibilhy Evaluation Criteria Resolved problem on printer at Wakefield Elem.. 09Z06Z95 09Z08Z95 Resolved problem with printer connection for Southwest Jr High. Resolved problem with down Controller at Romine. Resolved problem with Twinaxle Timeout for IRC. Resolved problem with printer at Henderson. Resolved problem with AC that leaked near Computer Equipment at Booker. Resolved problem with voice and data line goirrg down at Booker. 2.2 (The Information Services Department will develop or acquire the software required to support the needs of the districtl. Automate cross check of Teacher Certification for Human Resources. Produced Vendor History Report for Financial Services and Support Services. 24. 14 O9Z13Z95 09Z14Z95 O9Z1SZ9S O9Z18Z95 09Z20Z95 O9Z22Z95 O7ZO1Z95 O7ZO1Z95 O7ZO1Z96 O9Z2OZ95 O9Z2OZ95 09Z19Z95 O9Z29Z95 O9Z22Z95 O9Z29Z95 O6Z3OZ96 O9Z28Z95 O9Z14Z95 Director of Information Services 2.2 (All necessary software is installed arvf functioning properly to collect, store and report information in a timely and accurate manner).Program Seq #: 24 Program Name: Data Processing Page: Revision Date: 16 November 6. 1995 Program Code: 17 Primary Leader\nDr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: David Beason Program Goal: To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student information. To provide all necessary reports required to support school and central office based functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to all requests for information. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria Created Excel reports of Escrow downloads for Financial Services. Updated Teacher. ADMC12. and ADMCER salaries in the Budget File for Financial Services. Test GUPTA SQL Software for Windows. 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/28/95 07/11/95 09/14/95 Reviewed CIMS Software Updates with Human Resources and Support Services. 07/01/95 09/28/95 Test Powerbuilder Software with Remora EA400. 07/01/95 09/07/95 Provided report Pur,450, PQ's with approval and lookup missir^g approval command for Procurement. Removed all access to FY94/95 for financial users requested by Procurement. Resolved WHS problem on 'Order Quantities on Stock Items Missing' Report for Procurement. Loaded new release of LMS Software for IRC. Resolved problem with entering Teacher ID's st Henderson. Created Bus Driver Termination list and mail merge with letter for Transportation. Removed all non-LRSO employees from financial applications for Financial Services. 24, 15 07/06/95 07/05/95 07/07/95 07/10/95 07/10/95 07/11/95 07/11/95 07/07/96 07/06/95 07/07/95 07/13/96 07/12/95 07/12/95 07/12/95 J Page: 16 Program Saq t: 24 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Data Processing Program Code: 17 Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: David Beason Program Goal: To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student information. To provide all necessary reports required to support school arxJ central office based functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to all requests for information. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date ResponsibHitY Evaluation Criteria Provided Brady Gadberry FOI request on his sick leave. Produced new salary report after salary table changes to the budget for Financial Services. Distributed memo to explain Proposed Master to Master Schedule process. Provided District with copy of Data Processing production calendar for August and September. Created report showing duplicate requisition numbers for Procurement. Resolved problems with Master Scheduling for Forest Heights. Performed Accounts Payable Check Run for Financial Services. Provided Purchase Order Expenditure Report to Procurement. Resolved problems with Master Scheduling for Mann Jr High. Provided 3 copies of Budget Report to Financial Services. Set-up new User 1D for the new Secretary/Bookkeeper for Cloverdale Jr High. 24. 16 07/12/95 07/12/95 07/13/95 07/17/95 07/20/95 07/20/95 07/21/95 07/21/95 07/24/95 07/27/95 07/27/95 07/12/95 07/12/95 07/13/95 07/20/96 07/20/95 07/28/95 07/25/95 08/04/95 07/25/945 07/27/95 07/27/95Program Seq *: 24 Page\nRaviaion Data: November 6. 1995 Program Name: Data Processing Program Code: 17 Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: David Beason n Program Goal: To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student information. To provide all necessary reports required to support school and central office based functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to ail requests for information. Ran Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria State Department Financial Budget Report for Financial Services. Set-up Science work area to Math Department Secretary. Created July Bank Tape and July Bills Paid List for Financial Services. Created July BC/BS Differences Report for Financial Services. Employment Security Division Report for Financial Services. Automated YTDMNTH download for the Courts. Monitored Master Schedule for Southwest Jr. Produced report showing Purchased Orders $300 and below\n$301 and above for Procurement. Crested tape for Commercial Mailers for Pupil Services. Providing additional IBM training for IS Staff. Produced report with Employee Addresses for BC/BS letters for Human Resources. Produced Fixed Asset Report on EIS for Superintendent. 24, 17 07/25/95 07/28/95 08/01/95 08/01/95 06/01/95 08/01/95 08/02/95 08/02/95 08/02/95 08/04/95 08/07/95 08/07/95 08/04/95 07/28/95 08/0195 08/21/95 08/03/95 09/19/95 08/14/95 08/23/95 08/11/95 09/07/95 08/08/95 08/21/95 Page: 16 Program Sag #: 24 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Date Processing Program Coda: 17 Primary Leader: Or. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: David Beason Program Goal: To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student information. To provide all necessary reports required to support school arxl central office based functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to all requests for information. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Begirwdng Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria Produced Vendor labels sorted by zip code for Procurement. Resolved problem with printing and viewing Teacher List for Metropolitan. Assigned new passwords on the AS400 for various departments for school start-up. Created documentation for TEACHERS program. Set-up DFU screen to Update Stock Items for Food Services. Produced 2 sets of Employee by Site labels for Instructional Technology. Produced 1 set of Administration Employee Labels for PRE. F^oduced report of Fund, Function, and Object Codes from Budget file after final close for Financial Services. Created diskette for ODM from Court Submission. Set-up Stipend Report with Stipend Selection on ACS and EIS Systems for Human Resources. Produced Elementary School Secretary Observation Report for Information Services. 24, 18 08/14/95 08/14/95 08/14/95 08/15/95 08/16/95 08/23/95 08/23/95 08/25/95 08/25/95 08/30/95 08/31/95 08/21/95 08/15/95 08/14/95 08/16/95 08/23/95 08/23/95 08/25/95 08/26/95 08/25/95 09/01/95 09/07/95 8 1Psge: 19 Program Seq 24 Revision Date: November 6. 1995 Program Name: Data Processing Program Code: 17 Primary Leader: Or. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: David Beason Program Goal: 1 To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student information. To provide all necessary reports required to support school and central office based functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to all requests for information. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria Updated User Assignment Information for Information Services. Resolved security error problem on PC Support for Garland Incentive. Resolved Scanning Report problem for Dunbar Magnet Jr High. Updated Absence Reason Codes as requested by Human Resources. Produced list of Teachers with invalid SSN's for Human Resources. Set-up overview of attaching reports to ACS CIMS menu for Information Services. Produced Budget vs Expenditure report and graph for Information Services. Produced Audit report on Vacation days for Financial Services. Created mailing labels of Vendors with zip codes in specific range for Procurement. Created Excel Spreadsheet on ADMC12 and ADMN12 pay tables for Labor Relations. October 1 State Department Report for State Department of Education. 24, 19 09/05/95 09/07/95 09/12/95 09/13/95 09/13/95 09/14/95 09/14/95 09/14/95 09/14/95 09/14/95 09/15/95 09/07/95 09/08/95 09/13/95 09/13/95 09/14/95 09/18/95 75% 09/27/95 09/14/95 09/15/96 50%Page: 20 Program Seq #: 24 Revision Data: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Data Processing Program Code: 17 Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: David Beason Program Goal: To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student information. To provide all necessary reports required to support school and central office based functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to all requests for information. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginrting Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria Provided copies of Absence by Reasons Codes Report for Assistant Superintendent. Provided information on UALR MSOFFICE classes to District employees. Researched report card printing dates for monthly Information Services calendar. Tested 'Forest \u0026amp; Trees Software artd GUI Report Solution. Produced Census Data Reports for Financial Services. Performed programming changes to Quiz: ACCTDIST report for Financial Services. Created Excel Spreadsheet formatted for employees on ADMCR and ADMC12. Created September bank tape and bills paid listing for Financial Services. 2.3 (The Information Services Department will identify and maintain appropriate telecommunication services and equipment to support the needs of the District). 24, 20 09/18/95 09/19/95 09/19/95 09/20/95 09/25/95 09/26/95 09/26/95 09/29/95 07/01/95 09/19/95 09/19/95 09/20/95 09/25/95 09/28/95 75% 75% 09/29/95 06/30/96 Director of Information Services 1.3 Appropriate telecommunications systems are functioning to meet the needs of the District.Page: 21 Program Seq *: 24 Reviekon Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Data Processing Program Code: 17 Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: David Beason Program Goal: To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student information. To provide all necessary reports required to support school and central office based functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to all requests for information. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria Upgrade telephone system for Transportation and Laidlaw Transit. Ordered phone system for Drug Free School Network and Pupil Services. Ordered phone system for Mabelvale Elementary. Assisted with installation of telephones in all Elementary Cafeterias for CARE Program. Ordered phone line for Math Assistance Program at Cloverdale Jr High. Report pay phone out of order at Plant Services. Assisted with Installation of phone lines at Parkview High. Ordered Modem line to be installed for Counselor at Cloverdale Elementary. Ordered phone tine and set-up line for Pick Group for Human Resources. Add new phone line to 2-line phone and install phone for Human Resources. Relocate telephone system from Transportation to Safety and Security. Relocate telephone system from Safety and Security to Alternative Learning Center. 24, 21 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/13/95 07/13/95 08/16/95 08/16/95 06/21/95 08/04/95 08/21/95 08/16/95 07/14/95 07/14/95 07/13/95 07/13/95 J I 4 Page: 22 Program Seq *: 24 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Data Processing Program Code: 17 Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: David Beason Program Goal: To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student information. To provide all nbcessary reports required to support school and central office based functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to all requests for information. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date ResponsibHIty Evaluation Criteria Order fax line to be installed in Media Center at Pulaski Heights Elementary. Relocate telephone system for Truancy Center as per request from Pupil Services. Conducted meeting with Transportation. Safety \u0026amp; Security, Truancy, Southwestern Bell, and Harper. Resolved problem with phone lines at Henderson. 07/01/95 07/01/95 07/05/96 07/06/95 08/03/95 08/18/95 07/11/95 07/13/95 Resolved problem with receiver cord for Human Resources. 07/10/95 07/10/95 Resolved problem with dial torve at Metropolitian. Resolved problem with in-comir\u0026gt;g calls at Bale. Resolved problem with dial tone at Pulaski Heights Elementary. Resolved problem with dial tone in Pupil Services. Installed dedicated line for modem at Carver. Installed phone line for Procurement. Provided information on TOO equipment to Transportation. Installed additional phone line for modem at Otter Creek for Pupil Services. 24, 22 07/10/95 07/13/95 07/13/95 07/13/95 07/13/95 07/17/95 07/18/95 07/18/95 08/02/95 07/31/95 08/02/95 07/21/95 08/21/95 07/24/95 07/25/95 07/25/95Pag: 23 Program Seq #: 24 Revision Dete: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Data Processing Program Code: 17 Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: David Beason Program Goal: To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student information. To provide all necessary reports required to support school and central office based functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to all requests for information. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria Adjusted programming on phones at J A Fair. Ordered phone lines lor Henderson Jr High. 07/18/95 07/20/95 07/31/95 08/08/95 Relocate Phone Master line at Henderson Jr High. 07/20/95 07/28/95 Relocate phor\u0026gt;es for Labor Relations new office. Relocate lounge phorw at Watson Elementary. Resolved problem with incoming calls at McClellan. Ordered phone for CBI room at Mabelvale Jr High. Resolved problems with phorras Williams Magnet. Resolved problem will all phones going down at Terry Elementary. Repaired receiver and hand set problem for Human Resources. Ordered long distance service for line at Transportation. Ordered Voice Mail for Laidlaw Transit. 07/20/95 07/20/95 07/24/95 07/24/95 07/26/95 07/26/95 07/26/95 07/27/95 07/28/95 08/10/95 07/31/95 07/26/95 08/31/95 07/27/95 07/27/95 07/28/95 07/31/95 08/24/95 Programmirig changes made to Voice Mail for Information Services. 24, 23 08/01/95 08/08/95 Program Seq #: 24 Page: 24 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Data Processing Program Code: 17 Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: David Beason Program Goal: To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student information. To provide ail necessary reports required to support school and central office based functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to all requests for information. Plart Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria Programming changes made to Student Assignment's phone system. 08/02/95 08/18/95 Repaired damaged phone line at Bale Elementary. Resolved problem with dial tone/static at Booker. Resolved problem with dialing out at Dunbar. Resolved problem with second line at Baseline. Resolved problem with dial tone at Quigley. Resolved problem with fieldhouse line st McClellan. Relocated Registrar's phone line at Cloverdale Jr. Resolved problem with in-coming calls at Garland. Installed fax line for Fair Park Elementary. Resolved problem with no dial tone for IS. Installed fax line for Bale Elementary. 08/02/95 08/02/95 08/02/95 08/02/95 08/02/95 08/02/95 08/02/95 08/02/95 08/02/95 08/03/95 08/03/95 08/07/95 08/11/95 08/08/95 08/04/95 08/04/95 08/04/95 08/21/95 08/04/95 08/18/95 08/07/95 08/18/95 Extended fax line with T connector to media center for PC modem at Carver Magnet. 08/03/95 08/18/95 Resolved various phone problems at Parkview. 08/04/95 08/08/95 Install phone for Resource Officer at Pulaski Heights Jr High. 24, 24 08/04/95 08/29/95Page: 25 Program Seq #: 24 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Data Processing Program Code: 17 Primary Leader: Or. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: David Beason Program Goat: To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student information. To provide all necessary reports required to support school and central office based functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to all requests for information. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria Resolved problem with line short out in phone system at Dunbar. 08/04/95 08/07/96 Upgrading phones on current system at Brady. Repair phorte set for Baseline Elementary. Resolved problem with phone system going down at Wakefield. Resolved problem with phone system going down at Garlarid Incentive. Resolved problem with dial tone at Williams. Resolved problem with incoming calls at Badgett. 08/04/95 08/04/95 08/08/95 08/08/95 08/08/95 08/08/95 75% 08/08/95 08/08/95 08/10/95 08/10/95 08/10/95 Researching possibility of upgrading data circuits to 19.2 line speed. 08/10/95 08/11/95 Install fax line for Wilson Elementary. 08/10/95 08/18/95 Relocate phone line for Adult Education. Repair phone line supplying data link for Wilson. 08/10/95 08/10/95 09/11/95 08/10/95 Programming changes made to Network lines and Voice Mail box in IS. 08/11/95 08/13/95 Resolved problems with phone lines at Badgett. Order phone line for modem at Williams Magnet. Relocate 4 phone lines for Network Specialists. 24, 25 08/11/95 08/11/95 08/11/95 08/14/95 08/22/95 08/24/95 i Psge: 26 Program Seq #: 24 Revision Date: November 6. 1995 Program Name: Data Processing Program Code: 17 Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: David Beason Program Goal: To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student information. To provide all necessary reports required to support school and central office based functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to all requests for information. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date ResponsibUity Evaluation Criteria Resolve problem with transfer calls for Garlarxj. 08/12/95 08/15/95 Resolved problems with in-coming calls for Food Services. 08/13/95 08/17/95 Resolved problems with phone lines at Rightsell. Resolved problem with dial tone at Romine. 08/13/95 08/16/95 08/15/95 08/18/95 Programming changes for phone In IS/Applications Developer Manager.. 08/16/95 08/24/95 Repaired phone receiver for Cloverdale Jr High. Programmed long distance block for Southwest. Automate the itemization of LRSD main telephone bill. Relocated Homework Hotline from Channel 7 to Metropolitian. Resolved problem with dial tone at Food Services. Programming changes to phone systems at Gibbs. Remove temporary phone line at Safety \u0026amp; Security. Ordered phone line for Energy Management modem for Plant Services. 24, 26 08/16/95 08/16/95 08/17/95 08/18/95 08/21/95 08/21/95 08/21/95 08/21/95 08/24/95 08/17/95 09/18/95 08/24/95 08/22/95 09/11/95 08/25/95 08/28/95Page: 27 Program Seq #: 24 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Data Processing Program Code: 17 Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: David Beason Program Goal: To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student information. To provide all necessary reports required to support school and central office based functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to all requests for information. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Begirming Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria Ordered phone line and phone for CBI room at Mabelvale Jr High. 08/21/95 09/11/95 Relocate phone line for counselor at Bale. Relocate phone line for counselor at Rightsell. Resolved problem with 2 phones at J A Fair. Resolved problem with Data Circuit at J A Fair. Relocate and repair phone at Henderson. Programming changes made to phone at Dunbar. Programming char\u0026gt;ges made to phone at King. Track and report long distance billing for LRSD. Programming changes to Voice Mail for IS. 06/21/95 08/21/95 08/21/95 08/21/95 08/21/95 08/21/95 08/21/95 08/21/95 08/21/95 08/28/95 08/28/95 08/24/95 08/21/95 76% 08/25/95 08/23/95 09/01/95 09/29/95 Repaired broken phone in Superintendent's Office. 08/23/95 08/23/95 Repair console and relocate line at Rockefeller. Install phone and relocate stations at Henderson. Ordered fax line for Baseline. Repaired dial tone and made programming changes for Booker Magnet. Install phone line for Energy Management at Mann. 24, 27 08/23/95 08/23/95 08/23/95 08/24/95 06/24/95 09/01/96 75% 08/24/95 09/29/95 06/28/95 1 Page\n26 Program Seq #: 24 Revision Data\nNovember 6, 1995 Program Name\nData Processing Program Code: 17 Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: David Beason Program Goal: To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student information. To provide all necessary reports required to support school and central office based functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to all requests for information. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria Ordered fax line for McDermott. 08/24/95 08/28/95 Install phone line in Music Department at Parkview. 08/24/95 09/15/95 Repaired line 2 on phone at Baseline. 08/25/95 06/28/95 Telephone Support Report for week of August 28-September 1, 1995. 08/28/95 09/01/95 Repair various phone problems at Franklin. Resolved problem hearing on phone for Fulbright. Resolved problem with dial tone at Fair Park. 08/28/95 08/29/95 08/30/95 06/31/95 08/29/95 08/31/95 Programmirrg changes to intercom for Henderson. 08/30/95 09/05/95 Relocate and changes to phone system at IRC. Resolved problems with outside calls at Mann. Programmed phone changes for at Mabelvale Jr. Relocated phone line for McClellan Annex. 08/30/95 08/30/95 08/30/95 08/30/95 09/11/95 09/11/95 09/11/95 09/11/95 Resolved problem with in-coming call at Woodruff. 08/30/95 08/31/95 Repair static on phone line at Booker. 09/01/95 09/05/95 Repair bad receiver for phone at Williams. 09/01/95 09/06/95 24, 28Page: 29 Program Seq #: 24 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Data Processing Program Code: 17 Primary Leader: Or. Henry Williams Secondary Leader\nDavid Beason Program Goal: To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student information. To provide all necessary reports required to support school and central office based functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to all requests for information. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria Telephone Support Report for week of September 5-8, 1995. Programmed changes and relocated phone at King. Programmed changes made for phone in Assistant Superintendent's office. Programming changes made to phone for IS. Reconrrected 2 phone lines at J A Pair. 09/05/95 09/08/95 09/06/95 09/06/95 09/06/95 09/07/95 09/07/95 09/08/95 09/08/95 09/08/95 Repaired static on phone line in SuperinterxJent's Office. 09/07/95 09/08/95 Developed two memos for 'Phone Request' form. 09/08/95 75% Resolved problem with out going calls on phone line at Williams. 09/08/95 09/08/95 Ordered fax line for Rightsell. 09/06/95 09/13/95 Telephone Support Report for week of September 11-15, 1995. Resolved problem with phone system down at Forest Park. Resolved disconnecting problem on phone at Alternative Learning Center. Resolved problem with static on phone at Central. 24, 29 09/11/95 09/15/95 0913/95 09/13/95 09/13/95 09/13/95 09/14/95 09/14/95 i Page: 30 Program Seq 24 Reviilon Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name: Data Processing Program Code: 17 Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader\nDavid Beason Program Goal: To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student information. - ------------------ ---r - - functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to all requests for information. To provide all necessary reports required to support school and central office based Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategiea Beginrting Date Conrpletion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria Programming changes made for Mitchell. 09/14/95 09/20/95 Resolved problem with disconrwctirtg phone at IRC. 09/18/95 09/20/95 Connect intercom for Mabelvale Elementary. Resolved problem with static for Food Services. Resolved problem with 3 phone lines at Mabelvale Elementary. Repaired key pad on phone for PRE. Installed Phone Master System at McClellan. Telephone Support Report for week of September 18-22, 1995. Resolved various phone problems at IRC. installed fax line for Student Hearing. Installed answering machine in Network Center. Resolved phone problems st HerxJerson. Telephone Support Report for week of September 25-29, 1995. 24, 30 09/18/95 09/18/95 09/18/95 09/18/95 09/18/95 09/18/95 09/19/95 09/20/95 09/20/95 09/20/95 09/25/95 09/29/95 09/19/95 09/18/95 09/18/95 09/18/95 09/22/96 09/20/95 50% 75% 09/21/95 09/29/95Page: 31 Program Seq 24 Revision Date: November 6, 1995 Program Name\nData Processing Program Code: 17 Primary Leader: Dr. Henry Williams Secondary Leader: David Beason Program Goal: To provide the programs and data bases necessary to collect and store all pertinent student information. To provide all necessary reports required to support school and central office based functions. To provide all necessary information required by outside interests. To provide timely response to all requests for information. Plan Reference Page Number Objectives Strategies Beginnirtg Date Completion Date Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 2.4 Computerized Data Access- Computerized date access will be a reality in all incentive schools so that student data is easily accessible and access can be immediate for reports which might be rteeded relative to all school program aspects. 07/01/95 06/30/96 Provided Mitchell Incentive with PRC Labels. 08/21/95 08/21/95 Produced Payroll Rooster of Incentive Schools for Financial Services. 09/14/95 09/20/95 24. 31 LRSD FY 95-96 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Program Seq f: 26 Page: I Revision Date: June 30. 1995 Program Name: Minority Teacher Recniitment Program Code: 08 Primary Leader: RkhanJ Hurley Secondary Leader: Robert Robinson Program Description: Primary function is to recruit high quality professional and support personnel to meet the district's goals arid objectives in a wide range of positions in school and the central administration offices. To support linkages between the school district and higher education institutions\nassume responsibility for delegated programs related to staff recruitment to meet EEO and Affirmative Action and Personnel Services hiring standards\nresponsible for assigned tasks artd projects that will enhance the productivity and efficiency of the human resources division. District Goal Support: Develop and maintain a staff that is well-trained and motivated. Program Goal: Developing equity in employees composition that reflects racial and ethnic diversity. Plan ReferetKes: 1 FY Program Budget: $53,469.17 1st Qtr Expend: $13,165.13 3rd Qtr Expend: YTD Expenditures: $13,165.13 2nd Qtr Expend: 4th Qtr Expend: [ Related Function Codes: 1 26, 1Program Seq #: 26 Program Name: Teacher Recruitment Program Code: 08 Program Goal: Plan Reference Page Number L43 L43 144 LRSD FY 95 96 PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Primary Leader: Richard Hurley Secondary Leader: (To organize recruitment and retention programs for the purpose of developing equity in the employee composition that reflects racial and ethnic diversity.) Objectives Strategies Beginning Date Completion Date Pate. 1 Revtekm Date July 14. 1995 Robert Robinson Responsibility Evaluation Criteria 1. Update review of recruiting needs by age. race, sex and seniority in positions in the Districi to ascertain projected needs. 1.1 Review of all current staffing with identification of staff by sex, race and subject area who wilt be retiring to project needs. (Reserve at least 25 percent of the positions for Black applicants.) A. Automated sufTin\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\n "}],"pages":{"current_page":471,"next_page":472,"prev_page":470,"total_pages":6766,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":5640,"total_count":81191,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"educator_resource_mediums_sms","items":[{"value":"lesson plans","hits":319},{"value":"teaching guides","hits":53},{"value":"timelines (chronologies)","hits":43},{"value":"online exhibitions","hits":38},{"value":"bibliographies","hits":15},{"value":"study guides","hits":11},{"value":"annotated bibliographies","hits":9},{"value":"learning modules","hits":6},{"value":"worksheets","hits":6},{"value":"slide shows","hits":4},{"value":"quizzes","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":40200},{"value":"StillImage","hits":35114},{"value":"MovingImage","hits":4552},{"value":"Sound","hits":3248},{"value":"Collection","hits":41},{"value":"InteractiveResource","hits":25}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"Peppler, Jim","hits":4965},{"value":"Phay, John E.","hits":4712},{"value":"University of Mississippi. Bureau of Educational Research","hits":4707},{"value":"Baldowski, Clifford H., 1917-1999","hits":2599},{"value":"Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission","hits":2255},{"value":"Thurmond, Strom, 1902-2003","hits":2077},{"value":"WSB-TV (Television station : Atlanta, Ga.)","hits":1475},{"value":"Newman, I. DeQuincey (Isaiah DeQuincey), 1911-1985","hits":1003},{"value":"The State Media Company (Columbia, S.C.)","hits":926},{"value":"Atlanta Journal-Constitution","hits":844},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":778}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"African Americans--Civil rights","hits":9441},{"value":"Civil rights","hits":8347},{"value":"African Americans","hits":5895},{"value":"Mississippi--Race relations","hits":5750},{"value":"Race relations","hits":5607},{"value":"Education, Secondary","hits":5083},{"value":"Education, Elementary","hits":4729},{"value":"Segregation in education--Mississippi","hits":4727},{"value":"Education--Pictorial works","hits":4707},{"value":"Civil rights demonstrations","hits":4436},{"value":"Civil rights workers","hits":3530}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966--Correspondence","hits":1888},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1809},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1709},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1312},{"value":"Baker, Augusta, 1911-1998","hits":1282},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1071},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":858},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":814},{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":719},{"value":"Mizell, M. Hayes","hits":674},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":626}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"name_authoritative_sms","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":2598},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1909},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1704},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1331},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1070},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":856},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":806},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":625},{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":605},{"value":"Snelling, Paula","hits":580},{"value":"Williams, Hosea, 1926-2000","hits":431}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Nobel Prize","hits":1763},{"value":"Ole Miss Integration","hits":1670},{"value":"Housing Act of 1961","hits":965},{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":704},{"value":"Memphis Sanitation Workers Strike","hits":366},{"value":"Selma-Montgomery March","hits":337},{"value":"Freedom Summer","hits":306},{"value":"Freedom Rides","hits":214},{"value":"Poor People's Campaign","hits":180},{"value":"University of Georgia Integration","hits":173},{"value":"University of Alabama Integration","hits":140}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":17820},{"value":"United States, Georgia, Fulton County, Atlanta, 33.749, -84.38798","hits":5428},{"value":"United States, Alabama, Montgomery County, Montgomery, 32.36681, -86.29997","hits":5151},{"value":"United States, Georgia, 32.75042, -83.50018","hits":4862},{"value":"United States, South Carolina, 34.00043, -81.00009","hits":4610},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":4177},{"value":"United States, Alabama, 32.75041, -86.75026","hits":3943},{"value":"United States, Mississippi, 32.75041, -89.75036","hits":2910},{"value":"United States, Tennessee, Shelby County, Memphis, 35.14953, -90.04898","hits":2579},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":2430},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":2387}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Georgia","hits":12843},{"value":"Alabama","hits":11307},{"value":"Mississippi","hits":10219},{"value":"South Carolina","hits":8503},{"value":"Arkansas","hits":4583},{"value":"Texas","hits":4399},{"value":"Tennessee","hits":3770},{"value":"Florida","hits":2601},{"value":"Ohio","hits":2391},{"value":"North Carolina","hits":1893},{"value":"New York","hits":1667}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1966","hits":10514},{"value":"1963","hits":10193},{"value":"1965","hits":10119},{"value":"1956","hits":9832},{"value":"1955","hits":9611},{"value":"1964","hits":9268},{"value":"1968","hits":9243},{"value":"1962","hits":9152},{"value":"1967","hits":8771},{"value":"1957","hits":8460},{"value":"1958","hits":8242},{"value":"1961","hits":8241},{"value":"1959","hits":8046},{"value":"1960","hits":7940},{"value":"1954","hits":7239},{"value":"1969","hits":7235},{"value":"1950","hits":7117},{"value":"1953","hits":6968},{"value":"1970","hits":6743},{"value":"1971","hits":6337},{"value":"1977","hits":6280},{"value":"1952","hits":6161},{"value":"1972","hits":6144},{"value":"1951","hits":6045},{"value":"1975","hits":5806},{"value":"1976","hits":5771},{"value":"1974","hits":5729},{"value":"1973","hits":5591},{"value":"1979","hits":5329},{"value":"1978","hits":5318},{"value":"1980","hits":5279},{"value":"1995","hits":4829},{"value":"1981","hits":4724},{"value":"1994","hits":4654},{"value":"1948","hits":4596},{"value":"1949","hits":4571},{"value":"1996","hits":4486},{"value":"1982","hits":4330},{"value":"1947","hits":4316},{"value":"1985","hits":4226},{"value":"1998","hits":4225},{"value":"1997","hits":4202},{"value":"1983","hits":4174},{"value":"1984","hits":4065},{"value":"1946","hits":4046},{"value":"1999","hits":4018},{"value":"1945","hits":4017},{"value":"1990","hits":3937},{"value":"1986","hits":3919},{"value":"1943","hits":3899},{"value":"1944","hits":3895},{"value":"1942","hits":3867},{"value":"2000","hits":3808},{"value":"2001","hits":3790},{"value":"1940","hits":3764},{"value":"1941","hits":3757},{"value":"1987","hits":3657},{"value":"2002","hits":3538},{"value":"1991","hits":3507},{"value":"1936","hits":3506},{"value":"1939","hits":3500},{"value":"1938","hits":3465},{"value":"1937","hits":3449},{"value":"1992","hits":3444},{"value":"1993","hits":3422},{"value":"2003","hits":3403},{"value":"1930","hits":3377},{"value":"1989","hits":3355},{"value":"1935","hits":3306},{"value":"1933","hits":3270},{"value":"1934","hits":3270},{"value":"1988","hits":3269},{"value":"1932","hits":3254},{"value":"1931","hits":3239},{"value":"2005","hits":3057},{"value":"2004","hits":2909},{"value":"1929","hits":2789},{"value":"2006","hits":2774},{"value":"1928","hits":2271},{"value":"1921","hits":2123},{"value":"1925","hits":2039},{"value":"1927","hits":2025},{"value":"1924","hits":2011},{"value":"1926","hits":2009},{"value":"1920","hits":1975},{"value":"1923","hits":1954},{"value":"1922","hits":1928},{"value":"2016","hits":1925},{"value":"2007","hits":1629},{"value":"2008","hits":1578},{"value":"2011","hits":1575},{"value":"2019","hits":1537},{"value":"1919","hits":1532},{"value":"2009","hits":1532},{"value":"1918","hits":1530},{"value":"2015","hits":1527},{"value":"2013","hits":1518},{"value":"2010","hits":1515},{"value":"2014","hits":1481},{"value":"2012","hits":1467}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"0193","max":"2035","count":500952,"missing":56},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"photographs","hits":10708},{"value":"correspondence","hits":9437},{"value":"black-and-white photographs","hits":7678},{"value":"negatives (photographs)","hits":7513},{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":4462},{"value":"letters (correspondence)","hits":3623},{"value":"oral histories (literary works)","hits":3607},{"value":"black-and-white negatives","hits":2740},{"value":"editorial cartoons","hits":2620},{"value":"newspapers","hits":1955},{"value":"manuscripts (documents)","hits":1692}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/","hits":41178},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":17554},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/UND/1.0/","hits":8828},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/","hits":6864},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/","hits":2186},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/","hits":1778},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-CR/1.0/","hits":1115},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","hits":197},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/","hits":60},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-RUU/1.0/","hits":51},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","hits":27}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Jim Peppler Southern Courier Photograph Collection","hits":4956},{"value":"John E. Phay Collection ","hits":4706},{"value":"John J. Herrera Papers","hits":3288},{"value":"Baldy Editorial Cartoons, 1946-1982, 1997: Clifford H. Baldowski Editorial Cartoons at the Richard B. Russell Library.","hits":2607},{"value":"Sovereignty Commission Online","hits":2335},{"value":"Strom Thurmond Collection, Mss 100","hits":2068},{"value":"Alabama Media Group Collection","hits":2067},{"value":"Black Trailblazers, Leaders, Activists, and Intellectuals in Cleveland","hits":2033},{"value":"Rosa Parks Papers","hits":1948},{"value":"Isaiah DeQuincey Newman, (1911-1985), Papers, 1929-2003","hits":1904},{"value":"Lillian Eugenia Smith Papers (circa 1920-1980)","hits":1887}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"John Davis Williams Library. Department of Archives and Special Collections","hits":8885},{"value":"Alabama. Department of Archives and History","hits":8146},{"value":"Atlanta University Center Robert W. Woodruff Library","hits":4102},{"value":"South Caroliniana Library","hits":4024},{"value":"University of North Texas. Libraries","hits":3854},{"value":"Hargrett Library","hits":3292},{"value":"University of South Carolina. Libraries","hits":3212},{"value":"Richard B. Russell Library for Political Research and Studies","hits":2874},{"value":"Mississippi. Department of Archives and History","hits":2825},{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":2633},{"value":"Rhodes College","hits":2264}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":80736},{"value":"Collection","hits":455}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":80994},{"value":"true","hits":197}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}