{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1685","title":"Court filings: District Court, Joshua intervenors' opposition to the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) petition for release from federal court jurisdiction","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)","Joshua Intervenors"],"dc_date":["1997-12-02"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Joshua Intervenors","Special districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education and state","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School management and organization","School districts","School integration"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings: District Court, Joshua intervenors' opposition to the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) petition for release from federal court jurisdiction"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1685"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["21 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  FILE6 U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. DEC 4 1gg7 [)gC O 2 1997 DEFENDANTS INT ERVEN ORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. UJ:il~Of INTERVENORS ~ ION MONITORING The Joshua Intervenors' Opposition to the PCSSD Petition for Release From Federal court Jurisdiction A. Introduction The PCSSD has moved for a declaration of \"unitary status\" and the system's \"release from further court supervision.\" Petit., October 14, 1997, at 1. Subsequent to the filing of the motion,  _this court scheduled the matter for a hearing beginning on March 23, 1998. This memorandum discusses the standards applicable to the PCSSD motion and the showings made by the PCSSD regarding various elements of the system. In brief, the PCSSD errs with regard to the governing standards; moreover, if the district's presentation during the hearing mirrors the one made in the petition, the PCSSD will not be entitled to the relief sought. Indeed, the deficiencies of the Petition are such that it is appropriate to rescind the notice of a hearing and to deny the motion as was done in the case of a more detailed motion for termination of jurisdiction filed by the LRSD. See Mem. Opin. and 1 Order, Sept. 23, 1996, at 9-12. Consideration and resolution of the petition requires the parties and the court to address at least four areas: first, there is a need to designate the standards which identify both the areas of the system's operation to be evaluated and the criteria for the evaluations; second, there is a need to identify the extent (or degree) of compliance to be required in each area before jurisdiction is relinquished; third, there is a need to identify the party having the burden of proof to establish the requisite degree of compliance (or noncompliance); and fourth, there is a need to apply the foregoing principles. Intervenors' response addresses each area. A 14-page Attachment to this memorandum quotes many key elements of the desegregation plan of the PCSSD (April 1992) and the Interdistrict Plan {April 1992). These plans, we argue, rather than the so-called Green factors, as such, must be the focal point in the resolution of the PCSSD motion. To facilitate analysis of the issues presented by the petition, the Attachment clusters the provisions of the two plans by topic, rather than simply by page number. The Attachment is cited throughout this memorandum. The Joshua Intervenors argue below that the PCSSD has the burden of establishing a basis for the termination of supervision 2 in each area. However, ,intervenors do plan to undertake extensive discovery regarding compliance with the plans in the PCSSD. B. The Governing standards (1.) The Terms of the Plans Provide the Substantive standards for Evaluating the operation of the Pesso The PCCSD focuses upon the six areas mentioned by the supreme Court in Green v, county School Board, 391 u.s. 430, 435 (1968). See, for example, Petition at 4-5;  7-34. 1 In contrast, there is but a single, general reference to the Interdistrict Plan (Petit. at 7) and almost all of the small number of references to the 1992 PCSSD desegregation plan are in the form of terse assertions, without page citations. Ig. at 7, 9, 31, 33- 37; but see .ig. at 11 (single reference to page number in the plan). The citations to the significant provisions of the 1992 - PCSSD and Interdistrict Plans are obviously incomplete, as a reading of the Attachment shows. Moreover, the PCSSD approach is out of focus. Scores of rulings of the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and this court establish that the settlement plans, approved by this court by Order of May 1, 1992, must be the focal point in resolving the motion. 2 Intervenors next cite 1 In Green, the Supreme Court wrote in part: \"Racial identification of the system's schools was complete, extending not just to the composition of student bodies at the two schools but to every facet of school operations -- faculty, staff, transportation, extracurricular activities and facilities\" (at 435). 2 Indeed, the PCSSD recognizes this, in effect, by the very last part of its brief requesting this court to retain jurisdiction until \"enforcement of the Settlement Agreement\" is complete. Petit. at 44 n.5. See also LRSP y. PCSSD, 83 F.3d 1013, 1017, 1019 (8th Cir. 1996) (in appeal involving state payments 3 examples evidencing this aspect of \"the law of the case.\" In the oft-cited December 1990 opinion, the Court of Appeals directed this court to approve the \"settlement plans and settlement agreement as submitted by the parties.\" LRSP v. PCSSD, 921 F.2d 1371, 1376. The court stated that it was \"important for the settlement plans to be scrupulously adhered to ... \" (.i.g. at 1386) and alluded, similarly, to the parties' \"scrupulously and diligently carry[ing] out the settlement plans and the settlement agreement .... 11 .Ig. at 1394. Lastly, the court \"instructed\" this court \"to monitor closely the compliance of the parties with the settlement plans and the settlement agreement, [and] to take whatever action is appropriate, in its discretion, to ensure compliance with the plans and the agreement .... \" .Ig. at 1394, para. 8; emphasis added. The appellate court in 1991 set forth standards governing modifications to the settlement documents. It stated that \"[t]he 1989 settlement ... should indeed be a benchmark for the future path of this case.\" Appeal of Little Rock school District, 949 F.2d 253, 255; emphasis added. The court wrote that \"[t]he desegregation obligations undertaken in the 1989 plan are solemn and binding commitments. The essence and core of that plan should not be disturbed.\" I.g. at 256. Lastly, the court identified \"crucial\" \"elements of the 1989 plan\" \"with respect to which no retreat should be approved.\" .Ig. These include \"the agreed effort for workers' compensation claims and other matters, .court twice notes that PCSSD and LRSD .base their arguments on the terms of the Settlement Agreement). 4 to eliminate achievemel'}t disparity between the races\" and \"appropriate involvement of parents.\" .Ig. 3 Other pertinent guidance appears in the Court of Appeals' opinion concerning the PCSSD teacher strike issue. There, the court wrote that \"[t]he job of [this court] is to enforce the settlement agreement.\" Knight v. PCSSD, 112 F.3d 953, 954. The court added: \"Because this case has been settled, the settlement agreement becomes, in a sense, a particularization of federal law applicable to these parties.\" .Ig. at 955. Two examples from this court's many rulings support the Joshua Intervenors' contention that the court-approved settlement documents provide, with regard to substantive terms, the \"benchmark [at this stage] of this case.\" As previously noted, this court in a lengthy May, 1992 order, containing no reference to Green, approved the various desegregation plans, as modified.' The court's understanding of the significance of the plan provisions emerges from the following excerpt from that ruling. Special Education (PCSSD) .... While the Court approves the addition of new language regarding the relationship between social 3 It is noteworthy that the seven elements as set forth by the court are a combination of activities designed to attain an objective (or goal) and objectives\\goals. 'This action rendered the defendants subject to the possibility of a contempt sanction for the violation of a plan provision containing specific obligations. See Transcript of hearing of July 6, 1995, at 176-77 (court refers to then pending hearing on intervenors' motion to hold officials of the LRSD in contempt for plan violations). 5 deprivation and disproportionality in special education, the original language regarding long-range goals must remain in order for the Court to monitor progress toward the goal of reducing achievement disparity between the races and reducing over representation of black students in special education classes. [Order, 5-1-92 at 7-8] This court's decision of September 23, 1996, denying a similar motion of the LRSD \"to end federal court jurisdiction,\" is also noteworthy. The court first addressed an LRSD contention that its commitment to implement \"the desegregation plan\" was limited to a six year period, assuming adequate implementation. The court rejected this contention, noting that \"[t]he LRSD ... cites no provision that its duty to comply with the settlement plans ends after six years, and the Court cannot find such a provision in the settlement plans. 11 At 11.; emphasis added. This court then quoted the portion of the decision in Appeal of Little Rock School District setting forth the \"crucial\" elements of the settlements, 949 F.2d at 256, and described the predicate for any termination of federal court jurisdiction, as follows. The LRSD asserts in its pleadings that it has substantially complied with its desegregation goals. In order to end federal court jurisdiction, the LRSD must provide evidence that it has substantially complied with the aforementioned elements insofar as they obligate the LRSD. Reports of ODM and other evidence received in hearings in this matter reflect that the LRSD has fallen short of its goals with respect to many aspects of the plan. Instead of presenting substantial evidence of its compliance with its goals as set forth in the plan, the LRSD submits arguments that it has achieved unitary status because data from the LRSD compares favorably with data from other districts which have been declared unitary. The Court would be inclined to .agree with the LRSD with respect to many of these arguments if the LRSD were not contractually bound by the plan which it voluntarily adopted. 6 The Court has encouraged the parties to consider modifying those parts of the plan that are ineffective or unworkable. The court has provided the parties with the testimony of experts to assist in the modification process. Instead, the LRSD has used the testimony of these experts to ask the court to end court jurisdiction without first proceeding with plan modifications. The Court cannot so easily relieve the district of its contractual obligations, [At 11-12; emphasis added] These comments establish in this very context the centrality of the plan provisions to which the PCSSD voluntarily agreed. Three other arguments made by the PCSSD warrant responses. The PCSSD seems to argue that at this advanced stage of the remedial phase of the case, the parties and the court can return to the PCSSD's view of the scope of the liability findings as set forth by the Court of Appeals prior to the parties voluntarily agreements. Petit. at 2-3, 6-7. As intervenors have shown, this approach involves a head on collision with much law of the case at this and the appellate level. This court, we respectfully suggest, can not set aside the many rulings of the court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, necessary to adopt this approach. The PCSSD seems to argue that the fact that the Delaware case involved eight particular \"ancillary factors\" means that those factors are properly a focal point in this case. Petit. at 34. This approach is unsound. Relief regarding those factors was identified as necessary, and ordered, to support the desegregation remedy in the particular circumstances of that case. coalition to save our Children Y, Board of Education, 90 F.3d 752, 757, 769 (3rd cir. 1996). This case has its own  7 ,. decrees, entered largely by consent. The decisions of the court of appeals and this court establish, in accord with the general rule, that these decrees, in this case, provide the \"benchmark\" for measuring compliance by the officers and agents of the PCSSD. Finally, intervenors note other efforts to elevate substantive standards employed in other cases above the specific remedial steps and goals agreed to by the PCSSD in this litigation. Petit. at 1, 25, 31, 35-36, 38-41. However, none of these other cases involved a consent decree, much less one with the terms extant in this litigation. 2. The Degree of Compliance to Be Required in Each Area Prior to the court's Relinquishing Jurisdiction a. The Appropriate source of Legal Principles The parties, as has been noted, agreed in the PCSSD and - Interdistrict Plans to terms governing the operation of many aspects of the educational program afforded in the PCSSD. the parties' agreement also allowed \"[this court] to retain jurisdiction to oversee ... [the] implementation (of the agreements].\" LRSD, supra, 921 F.2d at 1390. The parties' agreements did not, however, address the standards and procedures for the termination of court jurisdiction in any particular area, including the standards delineating the degree or extent of compliance to be required in an area prior to the termination of jurisdiction. As to these matters not addressed in the agreements, it is the position of the Joshua Intervenors that the standards normally govern~ng the termination of jurisdiction in a particular area, described below, are applicable. 8 In the first place, there is no reason to believe that the plans provided for endless court jurisdiction. The system, as shown by the current motion, would not desire such jurisdiction. More significantly, by 1989 the courts had decided that perpetual jurisdiction would be inappropriate. For example, in Freeman v . Pitts, 118 L.Ed.2d 108, 132-33 (1992), the court described the 1976 decision in Pasadena city Board of Educ. v. Spangler, 427 U.S. 424. It noted the rationale of Spangler that a federal court in a school desegregation case has the discretion to order an incremental or partial withdrawal of its supervision and control. In resolving the teacher strike issue, the Court of Appeals identified the sources of law applicable in this case. Knight. supra, 112 F.3d at 954. The court referred to the settlement agreement, \"reasonable implication therefrom,\" and \"other applicable law.\" ,lg. Each of the latter sources of law supports the approach taken by intervenors. As the parties agreed to continued jurisdiction of the district court in traditional terms, 5 it is reasonable, absent explicit terms, to imply traditional terms to govern the court's exercise of that jurisdiction, when addressing the matter of termination of jurisdiction. With the parties silent on the matter, it seems eminently reasonable to draw upon the body of law normally utilized by courts considering the termination of jurisdiction, 5 compare Brown y. Board of Education, 349 u.s. 294, 299-301 (1955) with LRSD. supra, 921 F.2d at 1390. 9 namely, \"other applicable law.\"6 Two other factors buttress this approach. First, when the parties addressed the end of court supervision in some areas, they cited the principles set forth in Freeman y, Pitts. supra, a decision focusing on the termination of jurisdiction. See \"Stipulation for Order,\" Feb. 9, 1996. Second, when dealing with matters outside the substantive terms of t he agreements, the Court of Appeals has described this court's authority in traditional terms. LRSD y, PCSSD. supra, 921 F.2d at 1394, paras. 8., 9.; Appeal of LRSD. supra, 949 F.2d at 257 (nature of continuing jurisdiction), .ig. at 258 (standard for considering modifications). 7 6 These approaches reach the same result in different ways. In the first instance, intervenors suggest that the traditional concepts be viewed, by implication, as part of the agreement. In the second approach, intervenors argue, in effect, that the agreements are supreme as far as they go, with this court, which retains jurisdiction, supplementing the agreements, in areas not addressed, by reference to the traditional principles. See Restatement of contracts. second. sec. 204 (\"Supplying an omitted Essential Term\") (\"When the parties to a bargain sufficiently defined to be a contract have not agreed with respect to a term which is essential to a determination of their rights and duties, a term which is reasonable in the circumstances is supplied by the court.\") 7 See also LRSP y, PCSSP, 56 F.3d 904, 914 (8th Cir. 1995) (traditional standard employed in considering modification of LRSD plan); LRSP Y, Arkansas, Slip Opin., Oct. 14, 1997, at 3-5 (propriety of reliance on a federal statute, 42 u.s.c. Sec. 1988, as to the availability of 'a fee award, an area like this one, not addressed in the agreements between the PCSSD and other parties). 10 b. The standard for Evaluating the Degree of compliance The Supreme Court set forth the standard for evaluating the extent of compliance in a school district seeking release from court jurisdiction in Freeman v, Pitts. supra, 118 L.Ed.2d at 134-35. The Court wrote, in part (emphasis added): .... Among the factors which must inform the sound discretion of the court in ordering partial withdrawal are the following: whether there has been full and satisfactory compliance with the decree in those aspects of the system where supervision is to be withdrawn; .. [J  'The District court should address itself to whether the Board [hasJ complied in good faith with the desegregation decree since it was entered. and whether the vestiges of past discrimination [have] been eliminated to the extent practicable.' Board of Educ, of Oklahoma city v. Dowell, 498 U.S. ----(1991). see also Jenkins v, Missouri, 122 F.3d 588, 595-96 (8th cir. 1997) (quoting the foregoing portion of the Freeman decision); ,id. at 599 (\"As to the facilities factor, the district court found that certain court-ordered renovations remain to be completed. 959 F.Supp. at 1168. The district court did not err in requiring the terms of the court's decree to be completely fulfilled before relinquishing the ability to enforce compliance with the decree.\"); Pasadena city Board of Education y. Spangler. supra, 4271J.S. at 436, emphasis added (alluding to \"dispute as to the [district's] compliance with those portions of the plan specifying procedures for hiring and promoting teachers and administrators\"). The Joshua Intervenors relate these standards to the motion as follows. on the issue of degree of compliance, scrutiny must be given to two matters in each area addressed by the plans. 11 These are whether the ~CSSD has fully implemented, absent impossibility or the like, the various activities which it pledged to carry out to achieve objectives in that area .a.rul whether the configuration or make-up of students or staff, or the other target of the remedies, in that area, evidences achievement of the goals or objectives of the plans to the extent practicable. 3. The Burden of Proof Regarding Each Area In the Plans The matter of which party has the burden of proof regarding the areas of the system as to which the termination of court supervision is sought is another area not addressed by the parties' agreements. Based upon the same analysis, intervenors contend that the normal standards governing burden of proof in this phase of a school desegregation case apply. Under these standards, we submit, the PCSSD has the burden of proof to establish full compliance with the various steps set forth in the plans and to show that the plan goals have been fulfilled to the extent practicable. The general rule is that a school district has the burden of establishing the predicate for the termination of court jurisdiction in one or more areas of the case. Freeman v. Pitts, 118 L.Ed.2d 108, 137 (1992); 9 see also Wedo not suggest that these areas be viewed in isolation. The status of the activities is most important where the configuration of students or staff, as relevant, continues to reflect a racial pattern. '\"The school district bears the burden of showing that any current imbalance is not traceable, in a proximate way, to the prior violation.\" 12 United States Y, Fordice, 120 L.Ed.2d 575, 599 (1992) (higher education). 10 More generally, assignment of this burden to LRSD is consistent with the standards for allocation of the burden of proof set forth by the supreme Court in Keyes v. School District No. 1, 413 U.S. 189, 208-10 (1973). In Keyes, a school desegregation case in which segregation had not been required or permitted by state law, the Court identified instances in which Denver school authorities had the burden of proof. For example, proof of intentionally segregative actions in a substantial part of the system was held to establish a prima facie case that actions having a segregative effect in other parts of the system were also motivated by race. See 413 U.S. at 208-09. 11 The Court explained the basis for this rule as follows: \"This burden-shifting principle is not new or novel. There are no hard-and-fast standards governing the allocation of the burden of proof in every situation. The issue, rather, 'is merely a question of policy and fairness based on experience in the different situations.' 9 J. Wigmore, Evidence 2486, at 275 (3d Ed 1940).\" See 413 U.S. at 209. -The court then cited several situations in which considerations of \"policy and fairness\" had 10 \"Brown and its progeny, however, established that the burden of proof falls on the State, and not the aggrieved plaintiffs, to establish that it has dismantled its prior de jure segregated system. Brown II, 349 U.S. at 300. \" 11 \"In that circumstance, it is both fair and reasonable to require that the school authorities bear the burden of showing that their actions as to other segregated schools within the system were not also motivated by segregative intent.\" See 413 U.S. at 209. 13 been held to support a requirement that school authorities explain actions or conditions. See 413 U.S. at 209-10. Considerations of \"policy and fairness\" warrant allocating to PCSSD the burden of showing compliance with the terms of the settlement before the termination of the court's jurisdiction. The school district obviously has superior access to personnel and data, as well as greater resources, in. terms of personnel, to compile materials. The district's counsel, through its highest administrators, can request the lead personnel in each area to compile data and materials, if any there be, designed to show that the specified remedial steps have been undertaken and that goals have been attained to the extent practicable. This court seemingly adopted this approach when ruling on the earlier LRSD motion. It referred to the LRSD \"provid[ing] evidence that it has substantially complied and Order, May 1, 1992, at 11.  11 Mem. Opin. The PCCSD acknowledges having the burden of proof on the so-called Green factors. Petit. at 37. However, based upon its reading of the decision in the Delaware case, coalition to Saye Our Children. supra, the PCSSD argues that the burden of proof rests with the Joshua Intervenors as to any other areas where the relinquishment of jurisdiction is opposed. Petit. at 37-38. This argument is based upon an erroneous interpretation of the Delaware decision and again ignores the content of the courtapproved agreements in this case. The opinion in the coalition case discusses three areas of 14 district operations. These are the areas covered by the so-called Green factors (90 F.3d at 761-69, 776); eight so-called \"ancillary factors, as to which a \"1978 order of [the] court required the implementation of eight specific programs ancillary to the 9-3 pupil assignment plan\" (at 769-76); and \"certain performance disparities\" in the areas of achievement, special education and dropout rates, neither among the Green factors, nor covered \"in the ancillary relief order ... \".Ig. at 776. With regard to burden of proof as to termination of court supervision, the appellate court wrote: \"We emphasize that here we are not discussing the burden of proving compliance with the Green factors or the 1978 Order, as to which the school districts acknowledge bearing the evidentiary burden. Our discussion here, and our allocation of the burden of proof to [the Coalition] is limited to the issue of proving that the identified performance disparities are vestiges of de jure segregation.\" Ig. Thus, in the Coalition case, the court allocated the burden of proof to the plaintiffs only in areas not covered by a court order. Here, in contrast, the Joshua Intervenors' concerns, in their entirety, including as to achievement and special education, involve activities addressed in detail in the agreements, which the district has been ordered to implement, by reason of this court's approval of the plans. In sum, the Coalition decision is supportive of the intervenors' approach regarding burden of proof. 15 1 ' I i :1 c. Application of the Governing Standards to the Areas Addressed by the Plans, Including but Not Limited to Those Addressed in the Pesso Petition The Joshua Intervenors next discuss the various areas of the operation of the PCSSD which are addressed in the Petition. In keeping with the controlling legal standards, intervenors focus upon the specific activities which the PCSSD promised to undertake in the agreements, as well as th.e stated goals (objectives). Comments are made about the statistics presented (or not presented) in some instances. 12 Lastly, as appropriate, intervenors note distinguishing factors regarding the decisions cited by the PCSSD. 1. The Assignment of students. Including within Schools The PCSSD submits data on student enrollment, by school, - which is impressive, when considered in isolation. However, the system's showing in this area is incomplete for several reasons. 13 First. The petition is silent as to the plans of the PCSSD regarding student assignment, if supervision in this area is ended. One basis for jurisdiction to continue in an area is when this \"is necessary or practicable to achieve compliance with the 12 The PCSSD approach regarding statistical data varies. There is at times data by school; at times aggregated data, not showing the pattern by school; and at times no data. 13 Intervenors note ODM's conclusion, based upon its interpretation of the agreement, that in 1996-97, eight elementary schools and two secondary schools in the PCSSD \"[fell] outside the target for racial balance.\" see 1996-97 Erollment and Racial Balance in the LRSD and the PCSSD, ODM, Dec. 18, 1996, at 13, 14. 16 decree in other facets of the school system; -\" Freeman v. Pitts. supra, 118 L.Ed.2d at 135. Based upon the content of the plans, intervenors raise concerns infra about access to programs and the quality of school facilities available to class members. Intervenors and the court need to be informed about PCSSD's future plans for student assignment to know how they interact with these, and possibly other areas. 14 Second. The total failure of the petition to discuss the topic of the assignment of class members within schools is a major shortcoming. This issue is not the subject of either text, or statistics. In its 1990 decision, the Court of Appeals alluded to comments made by the intervenors' lead counsel, as follows: \"As one of the counsel for the Joshua Intervenors wisely remarked - during the oral argument, it is important which schools students attend, but it is also important what kind of education they receive after they get there. LRSD. supra, 921 F.2d at 1385. The PCSSD desegregation plan contains considerable content regarding assignment within schools. It addresses \"classroom racial balance\"; \"ability grouping,\" including its possible elimination; talented and gifted programs, including at the 14 In the Interdistrict Plan, the PCSSD agreed to cooperative efforts with the LRSD with regard to interdistrict schools (in both districts) and magnet schools (in the LRSD). Attach. at 11. The case file shows that the LRSD is not seeking the termination of jurisdiction at this time. The court and the intervenors need to know the PCSSD's future plans regarding the magnet and interdistrict schools, in particular, to assess the impact on the LRSD plan. The fact that three school districts joined in agreements may ~ead to the need to craft some special rules at the time when the limiting of the court's jurisdiction is proposed. 17 secondary level; \"honors and advanced placement courses\"; and \"advanced core curriculum courses.\" Attach. at 11-14. The plans provide for the gathering of data, the identification of any problems, and the crafting of solutions, if need be. Attach. at 6 I 12  We do not suggest that the PCSSD must provide a novel-length explanation of its implementation of the plan and the current configuration in each of these areas. However, to meet its burden, the PCSSD should be able to provide some statistical data, by school and race, as well as evidence of its carrying out of the specified activities. Citations to documents generated over time would often allow verification of the assertions made, if verification is possible. Failing such an approach in this and other areas, there is no guarantee that the plan provisions have been more than simply verbiage. 2. Transportation The resolution of this area must await resolution of the student assignment area. In the absence of information about future plans as to assignment to schools and data about access to enriched programs, one must speculate to address this area. 3. Personnel. Including Qualifications The Petition sets forth data regarding three areas. These are \"certified secondary staffing\" (by school but without a breakdown by category), \"principals and assistant principals\" (aggregate data), and \"central office.\" At 17-30. While the results cited are clear1y  positive in nature, they do not in view 18 . - of the full sweep of the commitments undertaken (Attachment at 9-10) warrant the relinquishment of jurisdiction. The existence of these commitments also distinguishes this case from others to which the PCSSD alludes. Petit. at 25. The PCSSD pledged that \"[a]enrollment levels of the organization will reflect a desegregated staff .... 11 Attach. at 9. The shortcomings in the PCSSD presentation are as follows: First. Data for certified staff should be provided by category, by school, so that it is possible to determine the extent to which black and white pupils are exposed to black faculty members, the staff members with whom students spend the majority of the school day. Second. The plan provides that the PCSSD \"shall staff each school with at least one minority administrator  11 Attach. at 10. The petition identifies, for 1996-97, 33 black principals and assistant principals and 37 schools. At 11-13, 27. Therefore, there is a need for a chart showing the number of administrators by school and by race to allow evaluation of the fulfillment of this objective. Third. The plan pledged efforts to desegregate several categories of staff, for which no data is now provided. These are \"support staff\"; the \"Special Education Department\"; \"facilitator\" in the Talented and Gifted Program; and \"coaches and band directors.\" Attach. at 9-10. Inclusion is important in each of these areas. For example, the support staff are often the first staff members to greet parents. Their make-up, therefore, 19 . - seems related to the central goal of promoting parental involvement. Data for these areas should allow a determination of whether there has been any progress over time. Fourth. The PCSSD made promises regarding staff qualifications, generally, and, in schools offering the compensatory program. The latter pledges were more specific. Attach. at 10. This area, an important one_ in a plan emphasizing educational quality and the narrowing of the achievement gap, is ignored. 4. co-curricular and Extracurricular Activities The PCSSD voluntarily agreed to more than three pages of provisions concerning these areas. Plan at 68-69, 76-77; ID Plan at 6; see also Attach. at 4-5. Under the law of the case, - citation to decisions dealing with systems without such commitments does not suffice to establish a basis for termination of the court's role. Intervenors note the following specific shortcomings in the presentation on this topic: First. The PCSSD has yet to submit the promised supplementation in the \"co-curricular\" realm. Petit. at 33. As the plan provides for a goal for each school (Attach. at 4), the data should be school-based. The providing of data for more than one year, as was done in the case of certified staff, will be necessary to permit a determination of whether any progress has been made over time. Should the data show \"minority underrepresentation\" in the past, the PCSSD should provide 20 ,. evidence that the affirmative steps promised by the plan (Attac "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1683","title":"Court filings concerning PCSSD's amended motion for attorneys' fees and costs as to state defendants, ODM, ''Report on the Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Monitoring of the School Districts in Pulaski County'', and Joshua Intervenors notices of deposition for receivership of Southwest Junior High School","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1997-12"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Special districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Arkansas. Department of Education","Joshua Intervenors","Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","Lawyers","Education--Arkansas","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Evaluation","Educational law and legislation","School management and organization","Education and state","School integration","School districts","School administrators","Southwest Junior High School (Little Rock, Ark.)"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings concerning PCSSD's amended motion for attorneys' fees and costs as to state defendants, ODM, ''Report on the Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Monitoring of the School Districts in Pulaski County'', and Joshua Intervenors notices of deposition for receivership of Southwest Junior High School"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1683"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["106 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"District Court, motion; District Court, three orders; District Court, Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's) reply to Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) response to Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's) amended motion for attorneys' fees and costs as to state defendants; District Court, order; District Court, seven notices of deposition; District Court, notice to take deposition upon oral examination; District Court, memorandum of Joshua intervenors in support of their emergency motion concerning attorneys' fees; District Court, response to motion to quash deposition; Court of Appeals decision 96-2047; District Court, order; Court of Appeals, motion to supplement record; Court of Appeals, supplemental appendix of Mrs. Lorene Joshua et al.; District Court, motion for extension of time; District Court, notice of filing, Office of Desegregation Monitoring report, ''Report on the Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Monitoring of the School Districts in Pulaski County''; District Court, order; District Court, joint motion for extension of time; District Court, three orders; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool  This transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  IN THE UNITED STATES COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DMSION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT vs. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA. ET AL. KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. MOTION f;lED U.S. DISTRICT COURT ':A STF.RN DISTRl(:T ARKANSAS 1' 0-[~\"-' :..',. /J\" 1i 997 JAMES W. McCORMACK, CLERK 3v: __.. - }\u003eL--A-l'ld'f'ffi'~  ..,n .. .u~~LERK DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS The Joshua Intervenors respectfully move the Court for an order directing the Office of Desegregation Monitoring to provide for the record a listing of all monitoring reports which it has issued during the past fifteen months, or is in the process of issuing ( with the expected date of such report) involving the Pulaski County Special School District and the North Little Rock School District. This motion is made because: a) there have been no monitoring reports issued by ODM and received by the Joshua lntervenors involving these two school districts during the period that the Court has granted leave to the Little Rock School District to utilize the ODM in a nonmonitoring, advisory capacity; and, b) because it is necessary to have the benefit of such monitoring reports by the ODM in aid of Joshua's presentation regarding the anticipated evidentiary presentation of the PCSSD during the hearing before the court scheduled for March 23, 1998. The Joshua Intervenors observe that the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit directed the creation of ODM and set forth the expectation that monitoring would be vigorous, continuous, purposeful and plan directed to enable contemplated implementation of the Settlement Agreement. The authority for this motion is the Eighth Circuit's several Opinions directing monitoring and - enforcement of the settlement plans. This motion is being made also because there is a general impression among some members of the Joshua class that the Court monitoring is not being directed toward protecting the interests of the class and is being directed toward promoting minimum compliance or developing excuse for noncompliance of, by and from the districts with the Court approved plans. There is no prejudice to any party by the requested relief Respectfully submitted, By: JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 (501) 374-3758 /J:k?l k. ~ Jo ~er, Bar No. 64046 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing pleading has been served upon all counsel of reco:g~ placing a copy of the same in the United States Mail with sufficient postage prepaid, on this - day of December, 1997. 9:ftl~~ John W. Walker IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, * Plaintiff, * vs. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al., Defendants, MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al., Intervenors, KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al. , Intervenors. * * * * * * * * * * * ORDER FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT AR'\u003cANSAS DEC O 5 1997 Before the Court is a motion filed by the Joshua Intervenors requesting that this Court direct the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (uODM\") to provide for the record a listing of all - monitoring reports which it has issued during the past fifteen months or is in the process of issuing in regard to the Pulaski County Special School District and the North Little Rock School District. 1 Whenever ODM issues a monitoring report, it has been this Court's practice to make that report a part of the record in this case. However, this Court will grant the Joshua Intervenors ' current request. By copy of this Order, ODM is hereby directed to provide for the record a listing of all monitoring reports that it has issued during the past fifteen months or is in the process of issuing. 11\\__ IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 5= day of December 1997. 1 Docke! No. 3081. rHIS DOCUME!NT ENTERED ON DOCK\u0026 SHEET IN OOUPUAHCE WITH AUL~ 71(8) FRCP ~ ,'UD'Y1 IY_~_ ct:: __ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION UTILE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, * Plaintiff, * FILED U.S DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT AR'\u003cANSAS DEC O 5 1997 JA~ES W. iMcCO~ACK, CLERK vs. * * * * * * * * * * * By._ \\ '~ I\\ 7_, \\I\\, '\" No. LR-C-82-866 oeP CLERX PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al., Defendants, MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al., In tervenors, KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al., Intervenors. ORDER Before the Court is a motion filed by the Joshua Intervenors (\"Joshua\") requesting that this Court convene a hearing involving the Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\"), the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (\"ODM\"), and Joshua in order to review the circumstances said to exist at Southwest Junior High School. 1 Joshua requests that this Court, upon appropriate findings, determine that it is necessary to have the school placed in receivership or in the hands of a specially designated authority other than the present principal of the school. The time for filing a response to this motion has passed, and the LRSD has not filed a response. This motion was filed during the time in which the Court suspended monitoring of the LRSD in order to allow the LRSD to develop proposed modifications to the desegregation plan. By requesting that this Court place Southwest Junior High School in receivership, Joshua has requested a drastic, equitable remedy. Throughout the history of this case, this Court has never placed a school into receivership. After reviewing Joshua's motion and brief in support, 1 Docket No. 3038. 08 this Court concludes that the facts as presented by Joshua do not justify the appointment of a receiver to take over the operations of the school. Therefore, Joshua's motion is denied. ft IT IS SO ORDERED THIS --!:\u003e- \"-day of December 1997. rHtS OOCUM8'T ENTERED ON OOCt(\u0026l SHEET IN OC'AIPU~ WITH RULE  AN00R 79(a) FRCP JN lHXi!J..7_ av _vr-___ _ 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, * Plaintiff, * VS. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al., Defendants, MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al., Intervenors, KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al., Iritervenors. * * * * * * * * * * * ORDER No. LR-C-82-866 FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARl(ANSAS DEC O 5 1997 By previous Order and in response to a motion filed by the Joshua Intervenors, this Court directed the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (\"ODM\") to provide for the record a listing of all monitoring reports that it has issued during the past fifteen months or is in the process of issuing. Attached to this Order is a letter this Court received from ODM in response to the Court's request. The Clerk is directed to file this Order and the attached letter, thereby making the letter a part of the record in this case. _?\\..__ IT IS SO ORDERED THIS ~ ') aay of December 1997. rntS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET IN COAAf\u003eUANCE WITH RULE 56 ANOIOR 79(a) FRCP ON /,_:]. ,/S/-91 BY _,lt ___ _ 084 Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas - Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor December 5, 1997 Judge Susan Webber Wright U. S District Court 600 West Capitol, Suite 302 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Judge Wright : 201 East Markham, Suite 51 0 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 376-6200 Fax (501) 371 -0100 I am happy to provide the requested list of the monitoring reports ODM has issued during the past 15 months, even though, as the Court has noted, those reports are already a matter of record. To the list of filed repons, I am pleased to add those which we are currently in the process of researching and writing, along with the approximate date of publication. The list attached by no means encompasses nor reflects the extensive activities and tremendous amount of work this office has done during the last 15 months. As you are aware, issuing monitoring reports is only one of the many ways in which ODM monitors and otherwise carries out the duties of this office. cki~ Ann S. Brown Enc. cc: All Counsel - ODM Monitoring Reports Issued Since July 1996 ~ Subject July 12, 1996 LRSD incentive schools July 31 , 1996 Elementary school facilities in the NLRSD December 18, 1996 Double funding of the LRSD incentive schools December 18, 1996 Enrollment and racial balance in the districts May 7, 1997 Budgets of the LRSD, NLRSD, and PCS SD June 4, 1997 LRSD incentive school extended year program Target Date December 1997 January 1998 January 1998 February 1998 February 1998 March 1998 March 1998 ODM Monitoring Reports In Progress SuQ.iect ADE's monitoring of the LRSD, NLRSD, and PCSSD Enrollment and racial balance in the districts Student achievement in the PCSSD Secondary school facilities in the PCSSD Secondary staffing in the PCSSD Student discipline in the PCSSD Student participation in extracurricular activities in the PCSSD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION  LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. RECEJlfED DEC S 1997 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS PCSSD'S REPLY TO ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION'S RESPONSE TO PCSSD'S \"AMENDED MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS AS TO STATE DEFENDANTS The PCSSD for its reply to the ADE's response states: 1. First, the PCSSD agrees with the ADE conclusions set forth at paragraph 2 of its response dated December 2, 1997. Accordingly, in revised calculations which appear infra, the PCSSD has deducted 2.9 hours for Sam Jones and 1.5 hours for Angell Jones in respect of the petition for rehearing. 2. The PCSSD agrees in part with ADE' s contentions regarding time spent defending the appeal. In reviewing the time records submitted with the December 2, 1996 Affidavit, the PCSSD has identified the following time entries, all for Sam Jones, which relate to work on that appeal: .8 5/8/95 .8 6/21/95 .6 6/26/95 .5 8/4/95 .1 . 8/9/95 2.9 11/15/95 Reducing this total by 1/3 results in subtracting an additional 1.9 hours from Sam Jones. However, the PCSSD disagrees that any reduction should accompany the oral argument. The travel time to St. Louis and the argument itself were not affected by the fact that three issues as compared to two were involved in the appeal. 1 Accordingly, the PCSSD has not reduced the time spent travelling to and arguing before the Court of Appeals. 3. The PCSSD disagrees with the ADE's conclusions regarding the affidavit and supporting time records. Contrary to the State's assumption, most of the time was spent regarding the final review and editing of time records spanning three years. It is simply a fact that reviewing, separating and then reassembling time records limited to two or three subjects is a tedious and time consuming matter. Particularly since the PCSSD is submitting no time or claim for the most recent work done in preparing the amended petition, the Court should accept the summary set forth in paragraph 4 below. 4. Having made the additional deletions as described in paragraphs 1 and 2, the revised claim is as follows: Timekeeper M.S. Jones C.S. Hancock A. Jones _ B. Benjamin V. Bryant J.D. Thompson M.A. Gocke A. Haguewood L. Hudson D. Compton J.H. Sorn 1994 $13,824.00 $ $ 654.50 31. 50 $ 2,020.50 $ 65.00 $ 30.00 $ 32.50 $ 20.00 1995 $ 6,936.00 $ 132.00 $ 1,281.50 $ 735.00 $ 181.50 1996 $ 4,655.00 $ 4,263.00 $ 75.00 $ 104.50 $ 600.00 1The 2.9 hours reflected on November 15, 1995 was the entry for preparation for oral argument. Thus, the preparation time has already been reduced by one-third. SUBTOTAL $16,678.00 $ 9,266.00 $ 9,697.50 TOTAL FEES 1994-1996: $35,641.50 CONCLUSION For the reasons previously explained, and as supplemented herein, the PCSSD prays for a total fee award of $35,641.50 to which post-judgment interest at the current federal rate should attach. Respectfully submitted: WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 200 West Capitol Ave., Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3699 (501) 371-0808 By __ -,,,'--+-----'~.._ ____ _ M. Att 76060) for aski County District CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On December 1 , 1997, a copy of the foregoing was served by U.S. mail on the following. Mr. John W. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 400 W. Capitol, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Ms. Ann Brown ODM Heritage West Bldg., Ste. 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Richard W. Roachell Roachell and Street 410 W. Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Timothy Gauger Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 FILED U.S. OIST\"ICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT A~'\u003cANSAS IN THE UNITED STA TES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION DEC O 8 1997 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, * :~ESJ . ~~A~ 2~K DEP CLERK-\u003c... Plaintiff, * vs. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al., Defendants, MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al., Intervenors, KA THERINE KNIGHT, et al., Intervenors. * * * * * * * * * * * No. LR-C-82-866 RECEIVEP DEC 9 1897 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING ORDER By previous Order dated December 5, 1997, this Court denied a motion filed by the Joshua Intervenors (\"Joshua\") requesting that this Court convene a hearing to review the circumstances said to exist at Southwest Junior High School and determine that it is necessary to place the school in receivership. 1 In that Order, this Court inadvertently indicated that the Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") had failed to respond to the motion. For the record, this Court wishes to clarify that the LRSD did file a response in opposition to the motion. 2 After reviewing that response, this Court reaffirms its initial decision to deny the Joshua Intervenors' motion. I(_, IT IS SO ORDERED THIS g day of December 1997. 1 Docket No. 3083. 2 Docket No. 3044 and Docket No. 3045. A 71I / ,f '!\" ,y1 ;;1 Oi,. V l4h .lt';Jii: ONITEDST'A TES DISTRIC J OGE rHtS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET s+-IEET IN COMPLIANCE \"?'~::VLE 58 ANOt'OA 79(1) FACP ON lco/fa _y_ IY ...f..S ::-.._ __ ...., 085 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET. AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. NOTICE OF DEPOSITION TO: Mr. Chris Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 2000 First Commercial Bank Building Little Rock, AR 72201 PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INT ERVEN ORS INTERVENORS 01r'.r\" .\\\"\\i'i\": lu\"'C, DESEGREGAilON ,iOi'!110R\\NG PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to the provisions to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Joshua Intervenors, by and through their attorneys, John W. Walker, P.A., will take the deposition of Dr. Leslie Carnine, at the place and time identified below, before a Certified Court Reporter or some other officer authorized by law to administer oaths. Said deposition will be used for discovery and/or evidentiary purposes, to full extent as may be allowed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Federal Rules of Evidence. The deposition will take place on Tuesday, December 16, 1997 @ 1:00 p.m. at the law offices of JOHN W. WALKER, P.A., 1723 Broadway, Little Rock, Arkansas, 72206. ... . : CBRTIJICM'B QI SBRVICB I do hereby state that a copy of united States mail on this 10th day counsel of record. sent via IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF v. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET. AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. NOTICE OF DEPOSITION TO: Mr. Chris Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 2000 First Commercial Bank Building Little Rock, AR 72201 DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to the provisions to the - Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Joshua Intervenors, by and through their attorneys, John W. Walker, P.A., will take the deposition of Dr. Don Roberts, at the place and time identified below, before a Certified Court Reporter or some other officer authorized by law to administer oaths. Said deposition will be used for discovery and/or evidentiary purposes, to full extent as may be allowed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Federal Rules of Evidence. The deposition will take place on Tuesday, December 16, 1997 @ 2:30 p.rn. at the law offices of JOHN w. WALKER, P.A., 1723 Broadway, Little Rock, Arkansas, 72206. CBRTifICATB or SBRVICB I do hereby state that a copy of United States mail on this 10th day counsel of record. via IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET. AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. TO: NOTICE OF DEPOSITION Mr. Chris Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 2000 First Commercial Bank Building Little Rock, AR 72201 PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to the provisions to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Joshua Intervenors, by and through their attorneys, John w. Walker, P.A., will take the deposition of Margaret Gremillion, at the place and time identitied below, before a Certified Court Reporter or some other officer authorized by law to administer oaths. Said deposition will be used for discovery and/or evidentiary purposes, to full extent as may be allowed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Federal Rules of Evidence. The deposition will take place on Wednesday, December 17, 1997@ 9:00 a.m. at the law offices of JOHN w. WALKER, P.A., 1723 Broadway, Little Rock, Arkansas, 72206. .. :- .;.... . .:.-':.-... ... .. ~ . ~  .  ~ ... ::. . ---.. . . f . v' ,' .. .  + CBRTilICATB or SBRVICB I do hereby state that a copy of the foregoing was sent via 4t United States mail on this 10th day De~ember, 1 97 to all counsel of record. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET. AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. TO: NOTICE OF DEPOSITION Mr. Chris Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 2000 First Commercial Bank Building Little Rock, AR 72201 PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to the provisions to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Joshua Intervenors, by and through their attorneys, John w. Walker, P.A., will take the deposition of Brady Gadberry, at the place and time identified below, before a Certified Court Reporter or some other officer authorized by law to administer oaths. Said deposition will be used for discovery and/or evidentiary purposes, to full extent as may be allowed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Federal Rules of Evidence. The deposition will take place on Tuesday, December 17, 1997 @ 10:00 a.rn. at the law offices of JOHN w. WALKER, P.A., 1723 Broadway, Little Rock, Arkansas, 72206. cuiri;xcli'1i' :or' sERVIcB . . I do hereby state tha~ a'\" c~py of United states mail on this  10th .day of counsel of record.  via IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET. AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. NOTICE OF DEPOSITION TO: Mr. Chris Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 2000 First Commercial Bank Building Little Rock, AR 72201 PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to the provisions to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Joshua Intervenors, by and through their attorneys, John W. Walker, P.A., will take the deposition of Sadie Mitchell, at the place and time identified below, before a Certified Court Reporter or some other officer authorized by law to administer oaths. Said deposition will be used for discovery and/or evidentiary purposes, to full extent as may be allowed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Federal Rules of Evidence. The deposition will take place on Tuesday, December 17, 1997 @ 11:00 a.m. at the law offices of JOHN w. WALKER, P.A., 1723 Broadway, Little Rock, Arkansas, 72206. '  A ... , -~.  CBRTIFICATB or SBRVICB I do hereby state that a copy of  the _foregoing was sent via United States mail on this 10th day 6 ecem r , . 997 counsel of record.   IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET. AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. TO: NOTICE OF DEPOSITION Mr. Chris Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 2000 First Commercial Bank Building Little Rock, AR 72201 PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to the provisions to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Joshua Intervenors, by and through their attorneys, John W. Walker, P.A., will take the deposition of Nancy Acre, at the place and time identified below, before a Certified Court Reporter or some other officer authorized by law to administer oaths. Said deposition will be used for discovery and/or evidentiary purposes, to full extent as may be allowed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Federal Rules of Evidence. The deposition will take place on Wednesday, December 17, 1997@ 1:30 p . m. at the law offices of JOHN W. WALKER, P.A., 1723 Broadway, Little Rock, Arkansas, 72206.  .. ~. , ~::,,:l~J:C,..~V~ ~' ~ :'--~~~~t,'.::~}= ;n. ~ . ~ ~,~:\\.'-:I't.~~ . . ~: :- -~- .. . . . . ~' ,~ ~ -!'~\\.. ,.-.;.,;.t.1:  :,~~ . ..,.. '\\',~ ',,- ...  .  QBR'l'IJIQATI QP SBRVICB I do hereby state that a copy of United States_ mail oh this 10th day f counsel .. of record.   via IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET. AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. NOTICE OF DEPOSITION TO: Mr. Chris Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 2000 First Commercial Bank Building Little Rock, AR 72201 PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to the provisions to the - Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Joshua Intervenors, by and through their attorneys, John W. Walker, P.A., will take the deposition of Dr. Richard Hurley, at the place and time identified below, before a Certified court Reporter or some other officer authorized by law to administer oaths. Said deposition will be used for discovery and/or evidentiary purposes, to full extent as may be allowed by the Federal Rules of civil Procedure and the Federal Rules of Evidence. The deposition will take place on Tuesday, December 17, 1997 @ 2:30 p.m. at the law offices of JOHN w. WALKER, P.A., 1723 Broadway, Little Rock, Arkansas, 72206. ... .. . ..,;,  .   .,.  .. \\   .,. t.,,  ~  .  \"\" : .,-,\\~. :..:.. ;1' .'i. . CBRTilICA'l'B or 'SBRVICI  ..?~t't~ {~~ ~,~I~i\u003e.4  I do hereby state that a copy of th~ foregoing was sent via United States mail on this 10th day  counsel of record. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INT ERVEN ORS NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION UPON ORAL EXAMINATION F'l-~~~'!},ED . - q \\~. L . TO: John W. Walker JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 l\u003cl- 1 5 1997 Orr/CE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING This will notify you that on December 16, 1997, commencing at 9:30 a.m., at the office of FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026 CLARK, 2000 First Commercial Building, 400 W. Capitol, Little Rock, Arkansas, the plaintiff in this case will take the deposition upon oral examination of Bonnie Brown or current Joshua class representative for the Little Rock School District before a duly qualified Court Reporter. Ms. Brown or current Joshua class representativ~ for the Little Rock School District is requested to bring to the deposition documents in- her possession pertaining to the position of the Joshua Intervenors with respect to LRSD's Revised Desegregation and Education Plan. The deposition upon oral examination will be taken pursuant to and in accordance with Rules 26 and 30 of the Federal Rules of civil Procedure. You are invited to attend and cross- - examine. Respectfully submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026 CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol street Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 By:-=:~ ChristopherHell Bar No. 81083 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Notice To Take Deposition has been served on the following by depositing copy of same in the United States mail on this 10th day of December, 1997. Mr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES, P.A. 3400 TCBY Tower 425 Capitol Avenue Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell Law Firm 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 - 2 Ms. Ann Brown - HAND DELIVERED Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Timothy G. Gauger Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 --- 3 FILED U S DISTRICT COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU~sTE.RN DISTRICT ARKANSAS EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION DEC 1 2 1997 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT vs. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. NO. LR-C-82-866 RECEIVED DEC l 5 1997 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING JAMES w. rpr9QfM1''r}.-f LrnK DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENOR Memorandum of the Joshua Intervenors in Support of Their Emergency Motion Concerning Attorneys' Fees This memorandum supports the emergency motion of the Joshua Intervenors concerning the payment of attorneys' fees to the these intervenors by the LRSD. It is designed to supplement that motion. The motion draws upon the authority of the court to interpret the agreement of the parties, to modify the agreement of the parties in appropriate circumstances, and to provide for interim awards of attorneys' fees. The intervenors assume, for the purposes of the motion, the existence of the limitation on the intervenors' ablity to secure fee awards against the LRSD, found to exist by this court in September 1996. The motion seeks the recognition of an entitlement to fees on two grounds. First. Intervenors contend that their work regarding the LRSD's motion for the approval of a Revised Plan, which includes a request to relace and extinguish the current LRSD and Interdistrict Plans, is outside the terms of the agreement urged by the LRSD and found by the court. See 1 Motion, para. 9. Second. Intervenors contend in effect that the court has the same ability to consider modifications of the fee agreement as it has, on motion of the LRSD, to consider modifications of the substantive terms of the current, multiple plans. In Appeal of LRSD, 949 F.2d 253, 258 (1991), the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, set forth the standard applicable to requested modifications of a consent decree as follows: We find the Sixth Circuit case of Heath v. Decourcy. 888 F.2d 1105 (6th Cir. 1989), instructive on this issue: To modify [a) consent decree[], the court need only identify a defect or deficiency in it original decree which impedes achieving the goal, either because experience has proven it less effective [or) disadvantageous, or because circumstsnaces and conditions have changed which warrant fine-tuning the decree. A modification will be upheld if it furthers the original purpose of the decree in a more efficient way, without upsetting the basic agreement between the parties. Id. at 1110. Later, in LRSD v. PCSSD, 56 F.3d 904, 914 (8th Cir. 1995), the court wrote as follows: A party seeking modification of a consent decree 'must establish that a significant change in facts or law warrants revision of the decree.' Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail, 502 U.S. 367, 393 (1992). If the moving party meets this burden, the District Court must then determine 'whether the proposed modification is suitably tailored to the changed circumstances.' Id. at 391. The modification 'must not create or perpetuate a constitutional violation,' nor strive to rewrite a consent decree so that it conforms to the constitutional floor.' Ibid. In its memorandum in support of the Revised Plan, the LRSD quotes from the decision in Jacksonville Branch NAACP v. Duval County School Board, 978 F.2d 1574, 1582 (11th Cir. 1992) as follows: \"Modification [of a consent decree) may be considered 2 when. (3) continuance is no longer warranted, or (4) a continuation would be inequitable and each side has a legitimate interest to be considered.\" The modification sought is consistent with these formulations of the relevant standard. As set forth in the motion, the representatives of the Joshua Intervenors have had to engage in an extraordinary amount of work over a seven year period, much of it due to poor compliance by the LRSD. Motion, para. 7, 10. The LRSD motion envisions that the Revised Plan would be in effect for at least three years beginning eight months hence, i.e., with the start of the 1998-99 school year. LRSD Revised Plan at 16. It is obvious that much additional work by intervenors' representatives will be necessary, not only in connection with the consideration of the Revised Plan, but also in connection with its implementation if it is adopted (or with the current plans if it is not). There is another important consideration. The portion of the Settlement Agreement concerning attorneys' fees contains the following provision: \"The parties are also satisfied, upon a review of their own time records and costs in this litigation over the last five years, that the payment [the settlement amount] is fair and reasonable and consistent with the payments made over that period of time to counsel for the other parties\" [Part v., explanation and emphasis added]. When it reviewed and approved the settlement, the Court of Appeals held the figure to be reasonable in terms of the past work performed in a 34 year 3 period. LRSD v. PCSSD, 921 F.2d 1371, 1392 (8th Cir. 1990). Intervenors' noted in their fee petition of November 21, 1995, that counsel for the LRSD had been paid for 7,261.55 additional hours on this case through August 1995 and counsel for the NLRSD 3302 hours through April 1995. In addition, counsel for the PCSSD had been paid for hours throughout the postjudgment period, but the number was unknown. Affidavit of J. W. Walker at 10-11. In brief, the extraordinary number of hours required and the LRSD poor record of compliance contributing to that fact, the continuing need for work in the LRSD, and the additional, and continuing, payments to all counsel for the other parties are reasonably interpreted as a changed circum "},{"id":"uwg_phc_barnard19971201","title":"Oral history interview with Doug Barnard, 1997 December 1","collection_id":"uwg_phc","collection_title":"Georgia Political Papers and Oral History Program","dcterms_contributor":["Steely, Mel","University of West Georgia. Georgia Political Papers and Oral History Program"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Georgia, 32.75042, -83.50018"],"dcterms_creator":["Barnard, Douglas"],"dc_date":["1997-12-01"],"dcterms_description":["Douglas Druie Barnard, Jr. was born in Augusta, Georgia in 1922, where he went to school before earning an A.B. degree from Mercer University in 1943. He served in the United States Army from 1943-1945, and then returned to Mercer, where he obtained his law degree in 1948. Barnard entered the banking industry after college, and served as executive secretary to Governor Carl E. Sanders from 1963-1966. He was a delegate to the 1964 Democratic National Convention and was elected to represent the 10th district in Congress in 1976. Barnard's major emphasis in Congress was on banking reform and he tried repeatedly to revamp banking laws with little success. He left Congress in 1993 and currently lives in Augusta.; Interviewed by Mel Steely on December 1, 1997 at the University of West Georgia.; Barnard starts the interview by discussing his childhood in Augusta, Georgia, and talks about his parents' professions and his education. He talks about what he remembers about life during the Great Depression when he was a child; he said his family had to scratch and save in order to maintain themselves. He says that he went to Mercer because his parents were against him going to the University of Georgia. After the outbreak of World War II, Barnard went through several hoops only to end up discharged in Fort Benning, when he decided to go straight into law school. Upon graduation, he decided to get employment with the Georgia Railroad Bank and Trust. He brings up the domination of his community by a clique called the \"Cracker Party,\" which he said was not good for them. Barnard then transitions into a discussion on the politically independent party. Barnard then spends a great deal of time discussing his time with Carl Sanders and his tenure as Sanders' executive secretary. He answers questions about his relationships with and opinions on other Georgia politicians, then begins talking about his election for Congress."],"dc_format":["video/mp4"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Carrollton, Ga. : University of West Georgia Special Collections in association with the Digital Library of Georgia"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Georgia Political Papers and Oral History Program oral history interviews. Annie Belle Weaver Special Collections, Irvine Sullivan Ingram Library, State University of West Georgia"],"dcterms_subject":["Georgia--Politics and government--1865-1950","Georgia--Politics and government--1951-","Legislators--Georgia--Interviews","United States. Army","Georgia Institute of Technology","Mercer University--Alumni and alumnae","National Independent Party (U.S.)","Georgia Railroad Bank and Trust Co.","United States. Montgomery G.I. Bill","Augusta (Ga.)","Segregation","Banks and banking--United States","Banks and banking--Georgia","Depressions--1929","Richmond County (Ga.)","World War, 1939-1945"],"dcterms_title":["Oral history interview with Doug Barnard, 1997 December 1"],"dcterms_type":["MovingImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["University of West Georgia. Special Collections"],"edm_is_shown_by":["https://dlg.galileo.usg.edu/uwg/phc/do:barnard19971201"],"edm_is_shown_at":["https://dlg.galileo.usg.edu/id:uwg_phc_barnard19971201"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":["Cite as: [interview title], Georgia Political Papers and Oral History Program oral history interviews. Annie Belle Weaver Special Collections, Irvine Sullivan Ingram Library, University of West Georgia"],"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)","moving images"],"dcterms_extent":["2 interviews : (circa 120 mins.; circa 78 mins.)"],"dlg_subject_personal":["Barnard, Douglas--Interviews","Barnard, Douglas","Arnall, Ellis Gibbs, 1907-1992","Callaway, Howard H. (Howard Hollis), 1927-2014","Carter, Jimmy, 1924-","Lance, Bert, 1931-2013","Maddox, Lester, 1915-2003","Roberts, Ray, 1913-1992","Russell, Richard B. (Richard Brevard), 1897-1971","Sanders, Carl, 1925-2014","Talmadge, Herman E. (Herman Eugene), 1913-2002","Vandiver, S. Ernest (Samuel Ernest), 1918-2005"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"suc_jad_768","title":"Photograph, 1997 Nov. 28, of Mattie De Laine, Joseph A. De Laine, Jr., Ophelia De Laine Cona, Brumit De Laine, and other family members","collection_id":"suc_jad","collection_title":"Rev. Joseph A. DeLaine Papers ca. 1918-2000","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1997-11-28"],"dcterms_description":["Photo of 90th birthday celebration for [Mattie DeLaine]; corresponding letter identifies individuals, including Mattie, Joseph Jr., and Brumit De Laine, Ophelia De Laine Cona, and other family members."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Columbia, S.C. : University of South Carolina. South Caroliniana Library"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Legal size - 13439 - (Folder 30)","Joseph A. DeLaine Papers"],"dcterms_subject":["De Laine, Mattie Belton--Pictorial works","De Laine, Joseph A.--Pictorial works","Gona, Ophelia De Laine--Pictorial works","De Laine, Brumit--Pictorial works"],"dcterms_title":["Photograph, 1997 Nov. 28, of Mattie De Laine, Joseph A. De Laine, Jr., Ophelia De Laine Cona, Brumit De Laine, and other family members"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["South Caroliniana Library"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://digital.tcl.sc.edu/cdm/ref/collection/jad/id/768"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Copyright Not Evaluated. For more information contact the South Caroliniana Library, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208."],"dcterms_medium":["photographs"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"suc_jad_jad768","title":"Photograph, 1997 Nov. 28, of Mattie DeLaine, Joseph A. DeLaine, Jr., Ophelia DeLaine Cona, Brumit DeLaine, and other family members","collection_id":"suc_jad","collection_title":"Rev. Joseph A. DeLaine Papers ca. 1918-2000","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, South Carolina, 34.00043, -81.00009"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1997-11-28"],"dcterms_description":["Photograph of 90th birthday celebration for Mattie DeLaine on November 28, 1997. A corresponding letter identifieds individuals in the photograph, including Mattie, Joseph Jr., and Brumit DeLaine and Ophelia DeLaine Gona and other family members.","The Civil Rights Digital Library received support from a National Leadership Grant for Libraries awarded to the University of Georgia by the Institute of Museum and Library Services for the aggregation and enhancement of partner metadata."],"dc_format":null,"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":["Forms part of online collection: Rev. Joseph A. DeLaine papers, ca. 1918-2000."],"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Legal size - 13439 - (Folder 30), Joseph Armstrong DeLaine papers, ca. 1918-2000,  South Caroliniana Library, University of South Carolina, Columbus, South Carolina."],"dcterms_subject":["African American women","African American families","Birthdays","Dwellings"],"dcterms_title":["Photograph, 1997 Nov. 28, of Mattie DeLaine, Joseph A. DeLaine, Jr., Ophelia DeLaine Cona, Brumit DeLaine, and other family members"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["South Caroliniana Library"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["https://digital.tcl.sc.edu/digital/collection/jad/id/768"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["photographs"],"dcterms_extent":["image/jpg","Images"],"dlg_subject_personal":["De Laine, Mattie Belton, 1907-1999","De Laine, Joseph A. (Joseph Armstrong), 1933-","De Laine, Brumit Belton, 1937-","Gona, Ophelia De Laine, 1936-"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"ere_c18_51300","title":"Ella Elizabeth Tyson Harris oral history interview, November 3, 1997","collection_id":"ere_c18","collection_title":"African American History","dcterms_contributor":["Ruffin, Carrie"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, North Carolina, 35.50069, -80.00032"],"dcterms_creator":["Harris, Ella Elizabeth Tyson"],"dc_date":["1997-11-03"],"dcterms_description":["Interview with Ella Elizabeth Tyson Harris an African American educator in Greenville, N.C. who taught French at C. M. Eppes School (1967-1968), black studies and history at J. H. Rose Senior High School (ca. 1970), and is currently a school administrator at J. H. Rose. Harris discusses her education, her career as an educator, and African American history in Greenville. The interview took place at J. H. Rose High School in Greenville, N.C. Interviewer: Carrie Ruffin. Field notes and critique of the interview also available."],"dc_format":["audio/mpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["Education--North Carolina--Greenville","African Americans--North Carolina--Greenville--History","African American school administrators--North Carolina--Greenville","African American teachers--North Carolina--Greenville","African American women--North Carolina--Greenville","School integration--North Carolina--Greenville","Teachers--North Carolina--Greenville--Interviews"],"dcterms_title":["Ella Elizabeth Tyson Harris oral history interview, November 3, 1997"],"dcterms_type":["Sound"],"dcterms_provenance":["J.Y. Joyner Library"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["https://digital.lib.ecu.edu/51300"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["This item has been made available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Researchers are responsible for using these materials in accordance with Title 17 of the United States Code and any other applicable statutes. If you are the creator or copyright holder of this item and would like it removed, please contact us at als_digitalcollections@ecu.edu."],"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Harris, Ella Elizabeth Tyson"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_31","title":"Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["1997-11","1997-12"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Little Rock (Ark.). Office of Desegregation Monitoring","School integration--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Project managers--Implements"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/31"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nLittle Rock School District, plaintiff vs. Pulaski County Special School District, defendant.\nIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DMSION IVED ov 2 6 1997 OlflCE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF v. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of ADE's Project Management Tool for November, 1997. Respectfully Submitted, WINSTON BRYANT Attorney General -\n__~ /, ~ TIMO'i1-tva. ~ER#95019 Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 682-2007 Attorney for Arkansas Department of Education , IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL V. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL NO. LR-C-82-866 ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL RECEIVE NOV 2 S 1997 OFFiCE OF DESffl ~,~ITORING DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) 8. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Sa_sed on the 1mormation=availa61e at Octooer'31, 19'97, ~ ADE i\nal~ulated for FY 97(98, subject to_periodic adjustments. C. Process and distribute State MFPA. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 At October 1997, distributions of State Equalization Funding for FY '97/98 were as follows: LRSD - $11,470,002 NLRSD- $6,618,198 pc~sD -J1p, 111,014 !The allotments of State Equalization Funding calculated for FY 97/98 at October 31, 1997, subject to periodic 2 c\nljustments, were _as follows: LRSD - $42,056,681 NLRSD- $24,266,733 PCSSD- $55,410,722 D. Determine the number of Magnet students residing in each District and attending a Magnet School. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at October 3~1, 1997 (or FY 97 /9~, suofect io periodic apj1cJstments. 2 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as ordered by the Court. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 F. Calculate state aid due the LRSD based upon the Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 G. Process and distribute state aid for Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 IJ bistributions'fo'r Fy ~7{98\"\"at b.d8Deri 3'1\n199'7 !~talea, $2,~55,317. otment calculated at October 1997for FY 97/98 was $9,002,821, '4 'OY~'1i. .............. ~~x:ic-................... = .,.,...,._ bjecJ to. p~ri.odic agjuslments. H. Calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school district is entitled. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 3 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) H. Calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school district is entitled. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 t\nalculated f r FY 97/98, _subject to periodic adjustments. I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. J . 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, September - June. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Distributions for FY 97/98 at October 31, 1997 were: LRSD - $709,626 ~LRSD - $283,222 PCSSD - $1,164,468 The allotments calculated for FY 97 /98 at October 31, 1997, subject to periodic adjustments, were: LRSD - $3,548,125 NLRSD-$1,416,112 PCSSD - $5,822,342 Districts submit an estimated Magnet and M-to-M transportation budget to ADE. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, December of each year. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 In September 1997, the Magnet and M-to-M transportation budgets for FY 97/98 were submitted to the ADE by the Districts. K. Reginald Wilson notifies General Finance to pay districts for first two-thirds of the Districts' proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 4 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) K. Reginald Wilson notifies General Finance to pay districts for first two-thirds of the Districts' proposed budget. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 In September 1997, General Finance was notified to pay the first onethird payments for FY 97/98 to the Districts. It should be noted that the Transportation Coordinator is currently performing this function. L. ADE pays districts for first two-thirds of their proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 In September 1997, General Finance made the first one-third payments to the Districts for their FY 97/98 transportation budget. At October 1997, the following had be~n paid for fY 97/98: LRSO - $1,019,861.33 NLRSD- $141,696.00 PCSSD- $536,541.00 M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 In August 1997, the ADE transportation coordinator reviewed each district's Magnet and M-to-M transportation costs for FY 96/97. N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as stated in Exhibit A of the Implementation Plan. s I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 In FY 94/95, the State purchased 52 buses at a cost of $1,799,431 which were added to or replaced existing Magnet and M-to-M buses in the Districts. The buses were distributed to the Districts as follows: LRSD - 32\nNLRSD - 6\nand PCSSD- 14. The ADE purchased 64 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $2 ,334,800 in FY 95/96. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD- 45\nNLRSD - 7\nand PCSSD- 12. In May 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $646,400. In July 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $624,879. 0 . Process and distribute compensatory education payments to LRSD as required by page 23 of the Settlement Agreement. 1 . Projected Ending Date July 1 and January 1, of each school year through January 1, 1999. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Obligation fulfilled in FY 96/97. P. Process and distribute additional payments in lieu of formula to LRSD as required by page 24 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. 6 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) Q. Process and distribute payments to PCSSD as required by Page 28 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1994. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Final payment was distributed July 1994. R. Upon loan request by LRSD accompanied by a promissory note, the ADE makes loans to LRSD. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing through July 1, 1999. See Settlement Agreement page 24. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The LRSD received $3,000,000 in June 1997. As of this reporting date, the LRSD has received $15,000,000 in loan proceeds. S. Process and distribute payments in lieu of formula to PCSSD required by page 29 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. T. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to NLRSD as required by page 31 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 of each school year through June 30, 1996. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. 7 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) U. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 97/98. V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. 1. Projected Ending Date Not applicable. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 97/98. 8 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. 1. Projected Ending Date January 15, 1995 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 In May 1995, monitors completed the unannounced visits of schools in Pulaski County. The monitoring process involved a qualitative process of document reviews, interviews, and observations. The monitoring focused on progress made since the announced monitoring visits. In June 1995, monitoring data from unannounced visits was included in the July Semiannual Report. Twenty-five per cent of all classrooms were visited, and all of the schools in Pulaski County were monitored. All principals were interviewed to determine any additional progress since the announced visits. The July 1995 Monitoring Report was reviewed by the ADE administrative team, the Arkansas State Board of Education, and the Districts and filed with the Court. The report was formatted in accordance with the Allen Letter. In October 1995, a common terminology was developed by principals from the Districts and the Lead Planning and Desegregation staff to facilitate the monitoring process. The announced monitoring visits began on November 14, 1995 and were completed on January 26, 1996. Copies of the preliminary Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the ADE administrative team and the State Board of Education in January 1996. A report on the current status of the Cycle 5 schools in the ECOE process and their school improvement plans was filed with the Court on February 1, 1996. The unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1996 and ended on May 10, 1996. 9 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and the data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Districts provided data on enrollment in compensatory education programs by race, gender, and type of program. The Districts and the ADE Desegregation Monitoring staff developed a definition for instructional programs. The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996 with copies distributed to the parties. Quantitative and qualitative indicators were displayed with specific information provided on cost and enrollment in compensatory programs. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996 and concluded in December 1996. In January 1997, presentations were made to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties to review the draft Semiannual Monitoring Report. The monitoring instrument and process were evaluated for their usefulness in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on achievement disparities. In February 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was filed. Unannounced monitoring visits began on February 3, 1997 and concluded in May 1997. In March 1997, letters were sent to the Districts regarding data requirements for the July 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and the additional discipline data element that was requested by the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Desegregation data collection workshops were conducted in the Districts from March 28, 1997 to April 7, 1997. A meeting was conducted on April 3, 1997 to finalize plans for the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report. Onsite visits were made to 11 Cycle 1 schools who did not submit accurate and timely data on discipline, M-to-M transfers, and policy. 10 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) As of June 1997, the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were finalized. In July 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were filed with the court, and the ADE sponsored a School Improvement Conference. Copies of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were made available for the Districts to review on July 10, 1997 from 10:00 am to 2:00 pm. The purpose of the review was to provide the Districts an opportunity to review the report prior to submitting it to the Court. Desegregation monitoring staff members were available to answer questions. Representatives from each district participated. In August 1997, procedures and schedules were organized for the monitoring of the Cycle 2 schools in FY 97/98. A Desegregation Monitoring and School Improvement Workshop for 55 educators from the Districts was held September 10, 1997. Monitoring expectations, instruments, data collection and school improvement visits were discussed. As of October 1997, 10 of the Cycle 2 announced monitoring visits were completed, and 36 technical assistance visits were conducted. On October 9, 1997, a planning meeting was held with the desegregation monitoring staff. Deadlines, responsibilities, and strategic planning issues were discussed regarding the completion of the Semiannual Monitoring Report. Reminder letters were sent to the Cycle 2 principals outlining the data collection deadlines and availability of technical assistance. In November 1997, technical assistance visits were conducted, and announcecl monitoring visits of the Cycle 2 schools were completed. 11 Ill. A PETITION FOR ELECTION FOR LRSD WILL BE SUPPORTED SHOULD A MILLAGE BE REQUIRED A. Monitor court pleadings to determine if LRSD has petitioned the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Ongoing. All Court pleadings are monitored monthly. B. Draft and file appropriate pleadings if LRSD petitions the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 To date, no action has been taken by the LRSD. 12 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION A. Using a collaborative approach, immediately identify those laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1 . Projected Ending Date December, 1994 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. 8. Conduct a review within ADE of existing legislation and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. C. Request of the other parties to the Settlement Agreement that they identify laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV. E. of this report. D. Submit proposals to the State Board of Education for repeal of those regulations that are confirmed to be impediments to desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. 13 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 A committee within the ADE was formed in May 1995 to review and collect data on existing legislation and regulations identified by the parties as impediments to desegregation. The committee researched the Districts' concerns to determine if any of the rules, regulations, or legislation cited impede desegregation. The legislation cited by the Districts regarding loss funding and worker's compensation were not reviewed because they had already been litigated. In September 1995, the committee reviewed the following statutes, acts, and regulations: Act 113 of 1993\nADE Director's Communication 93-205\nAct 145 of 1989\nADE Director's Memo 91- 67\nADE Program Standards Eligibility Criteria for Special Education\nArkansas Codes 6-18-206, 6-20-307, 6-20-319, and 6-17-1506. In October 1995, the individual reports prepared by committee members in their areas of expertise and the data used to support their conclusions were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. A report was prepared and submitted to the State Board of Education in July 1996. The report concluded that none of the items reviewed impeded desegregation. As of February 3, 1997, no laws or regulations have been determined to impede desegregation efforts. Any new education laws enacted during the Arkansas 81st Legislative Session will be reviewed at the close of the legislative session to ensure that they do not impede desegregation. In April 1997, copies of all laws passed during the 1997 Regular Session of the 81 st General Assembly were requested from the office of the ADE Liaison to the Legislature for distribution to the Districts for their input and review of possible impediments to their desegregation efforts. In August 1997, a meeting to review the statutes passed in the prior legislative session was scheduled for September 9, 1997. 14 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) On September 9, 1997, a meeting was held to discuss the review of the statutes passed in the prior legislative session and new ADE regulations. The Districts will be contacted in writing for their input regarding any new laws or regulations that they feel may impede desegregation. Additionally, the Districts will be asked to review their regulations to ensure that they do not impede their desegregation efforts. The committee will convene on December 1, 1997 to review their findings and finalize their report to the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. In October 1997, the Districts were asked to review new regulations and statutes for impediments to their desegregation efforts, and advise the ADE, in writing, if they feel a regulation or statute may impede their desegregation efforts. lri~Octobef1{:f97, lne Ojstricts were requested to advise:the-ADE, in ~rJting, noJater than, N9vember_ 1, 1997 of any f'!ew lawJhat might i-mm- pede~their desegregation efforts. As of, November 12, 1997, no :0. :)(},. .\n'Y \" \\\" :,, ~ritten',,,responses were received from the Districts. t The ADE ~. % ,_'\u0026lt;\"\"',M \"\"\" -\n: -,\n'\n,\"'  '' d ~ \":\nJ_   fOnCIY,,des th.,.at \u0026amp;!he D1stncts do ,not'feel that,apy1newjpw negatively illlpacts th.~Jr d~~g[~gation efforts. 15 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES A. Through a preamble to the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The preamble was contained in the Implementation Plan filed with the Court on March 15, 1994. B. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Ongoing C. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement by actions taken by ADE in response to monitoring results. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Ongoing D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 16 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 At each regular monthly meeting of the State Board of Education, the Board is provided copies of the most recent Project Management Tool (PMT) and an executive summary of the PMT for their review and approval. Only activities that are in addition to the Board's monthly review of the PMT are detailed below. In May 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the total number of schools visited during the monitoring phase and the data collection process. Suggestions were presented to the State Board of Education on how recommendations could be presented in the monitoring reports. In June 1995, an update on the status of the pending Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the State Board of Education. In July 1995, the July Semiannual Monitoring Report was reviewed by the State Board of Education. On August 14, 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the need to increase minority participation in the teacher scholarship program and provided tentative monitoring dates to facilitate reporting requests by the ADE administrative team and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In September 1995, the State Board of Education was advised of a change in the PMT from a table format to a narrative format. The Board was also briefed about a meeting with the Office of Desegregation Monitoring regarding the PMT. In October 1995, the State Board of Education was updated on monitoring timelines. The Board was also informed of a meeting with the parties regarding a review of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and the monitoring process, and the progress of the test validation study. In November 1995, a report was made to the State Board of Education regarding the monitoring schedule and a meeting with the parties concerning the development of a common terminology for monitoring purposes. 17 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) In December 1995, the State Board of Education was updated regarding announced monitoring visits. In January 1996, copies of the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the State Board of Education. During the months of February 1996 through May 1996, the PMT report was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. In June 1996, the State Board of Education was updated on the status of the bias review study. In July 1996, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the Court, the parties, ODM, the State Board of Education, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In August 1996, the State Board of Education and the ADE administrative team were provided with copies of the test val idation study prepared by Dr. Paul Williams. During the months of September 1996 through December 1996, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. On January 13, 1997, a presentation was made to the State Board of Education regarding the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report, and copies of the report and its executive summary were distributed to all Board members. The Project Management Tool and its executive summary were addressed at the February 10, 1997 State Board of Education meeting regarding the ADE's progress in fulfilling their obligations as set forth in the Implementation Plan. 18 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) In March 1997, the State Board of Education was notified that historical information in the PMT had been summarized at the direction of the Assistant Attorney General in order to reduce the size and increase the clarity of the report. The Board was updated on the Pulaski County Desegregation Case and reviewed the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued by the Court on February 18, 1997 in response to the Districts' motion for summary judgment on the issue of state funding for teacher retirement matching contributions. During the months of April 1997 through June 1997, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. The State Board of Education received copies of the PMT and its executive summary at the July 14, 1997 board meeting. Additionally, copies of the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and executive summary were also provided to board members. The State Board of Education received copies of the PMT and its executive summary at the August 11, 1997 board meeting. The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on August 4, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and to direction regarding the critical areas for the current quarter. A special report regarding a historical review of the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement and the ADE's role and monitoring obligations were presented to the State Board of Education on September 8, 1997. Additionally, the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Board for their review in accordance with the requirements contained in the ADE monitoring documents. In October 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. Additionally, a special draft report regarding disparity in achievement was submitted to the State Board Chairman and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. 19 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) 20 VI. REMEDIATION A Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 During May 1995, team visits to Cycle 4 schools were conducted, and plans were developed for reviewing the Cycle 5 schools. In June 1995, the current Extended COE packet was reviewed, and enhancements to the Extended COE packet were prepared. In July 1995, year end reports were finalized by the Pulaski County field service specialists, and plans were finalized for reviewing the draft improvement plans of the Cycle 5 schools. In August 1995, Phase I - Cycle 5 school improvement plans were reviewed. Plans were developed for meeting with the Districts to discuss plans for Phase II - Cycle 1 schools of Extended COE, and a school improvement conference was conducted in Hot Springs. The technical review visits for the FY 95/96 year and the documentation process were also discussed. In October 1995, two computer programs, the Effective Schools Planner and the Effective Schools Research Assistant, were ordered for review, and the first draft of a monitoring checklist for Extended COE was developed. Through the Extended COE process, the field service representatives provided technical assistance based on the needs identified within the Districts from the data gathered. In November 1995, ADE personnel discussed and planned for the FY 95/96 monitoring, and onsite visits were conducted to prepare schools for the FY 95/96 team visits. Technical review visits continued in the Districts. In December 1995, announced monitoring and technical assistance visits were conducted in the Districts. 21 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) At December 31, 1995, approximately 59% of the schools in the Districts had been monitored. Technical review visits were conducted during January 1996. In February 1996, announced monitoring visits and midyear monitoring reports were completed, and the field service specialists prepared for the spring NCA/COE peer team visits. In March 1996, unannounced monitoring visits of Cycle 5 schools commenced, and two-day peer team visits of Cycle 5 schools were conducted. Team lists and materials for two-day visits were prepared, and written reports of two-day team visits were prepared. Technical assistance was provided to schools in final preparation for team visits and to schools needing any school improvement information. In April and May 1996, the unannounced monitoring visits were completed. The unannounced monitoring forms were reviewed for completeness and included in the July monitoring report. The twoday peer team visits were completed, and annual COE monitoring reports were prepared. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits of the Cycle 5 schools were completed, and the data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Districts identified enrollment in compensatory education programs by race, gender, and type of compensatory program. The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996, and copies were distributed to the parties. During August 1996, meetings were held with the Districts to discuss the monitoring requirements. Technical assistance meetings with Cycle 1 schools were planned for the 96/97 school year. The Districts were requested to record discipline data in accordance with the Allen Letter and to include the race, gender, and years of experience of the teacher. In September 1996, recommendations regarding the ADE monitoring schedule for Cycle 1 schools and content layouts of the semiannual report were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. Training materials were developed with training schedules outlined for Cycle 1 schools. 22 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) In October 1996, all schools in the Districts identified their technical assistance needs by utilizing their school improvement plans. Technical assistance needs were identified and addressed to prepare each school for their team visits. The announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996. In December 1996, the announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools were completed, and technical assistance needs were identified from school site visits. In January 1997, the ECOE monitoring section identified technical assistance needs of the Cycle 1 schools, and the data was reviewed when the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, the State Board of Education, and the parties. In February 1997, field service specialists prepared for the peer team visits of the Cycle 1 schools. NCA accreditation reports were presented to the NCA Committee, and NCA reports were prepared for presentation at the April NCA meeting in Chicago. In March and April 1997, 76 visits were made to schools or central offices to work with principals, ECOE steering committees, and designated district personnel concerning school improvement planning. As of May 1997, 111 visits were made to schools or central offices to work with principals, ECOE steering committees, and designated central office staff concerning school improvement planning, and a workshop was conducted on Learning Styles for Geyer Springs Elementary School. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 15-17, 1997. The conference included information on the process of continuous school improvement, results of the first five years of COE, connecting the mission with the school improvement plan, and improving academic performance. In August 1997, technical assistance needs were evaluated for the FY 97/98 school year. 23 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) In October 1997, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives. The field service representatives provided technical assistance to the Districts through meetings with the ECOE steering committees, assistance in analyzing perceptual surveys, and by providing samples of school improvement plans, Gold File catalogs, and web site addresses to schools visited. l_n November 1997, technic\naf r~view')5'f1the EC0E process were f:onaucted_by the field servi~ r~preenJ~iio~opjunction wi!h the ~nnounc~d' rn.onitoring visits. B. Identify available resources for providing technical assistance for the specific condition, or circumstances of need, considering resources within ADE and the Districts, and also resources available from outside sources and experts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. C. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 An updated ERIC Search was conducted on May 15, 1995 to locate research on evaluating compensatory education programs. The ADE received the updated ERIC disc that covered material through March 1995. 24 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) C. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. (Continued) _ 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) In August 1995, a new ERIC disc arrived, and an updated search was conducted. These articles were reviewed. An ERIC search was conducted in September 30, 1996 to identify current research dealing with the evaluation of compensatory education programs, and the articles were reviewed. An ERIC search was conducted in April 1997 to identify current research on compensatory education programs and sent to the Cycle 1 principals and the field service specialists for their use. D. Identify and research technical resources available to ADE and the Districts through programs and organizations such as the Desegregation Assistance Center in San Antonio, Texas. 1. Projected Ending Date Summer 1994 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. E. Solicit, obtain, and use available resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 25 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 From March 1995 through July 1995, technical assistance and resources were obtained from the following sources: the Southwest Regional Cooperative\nUALR regarding training for monitors\nODM on a project management software\nADHE regarding data review and display\nand Phi Delta Kappa, the Desegregation Assistance Center and the Dawson Cooperative regarding perceptual surveys. Technical assistance was received on the Microsoft Project software in November 1995, and a draft of the PMT report using the new software package was presented to the ADE administrative team for review. In December 1995, a data manager was hired permanently to provide technical assistance with computer software and hardware. In October 1996, the field service specialists conducted workshops in the Districts to address their technical assistance needs and provided assistance for upcoming team visits. In November and December 1996, the field service specialists addressed technical assistance needs of the schools in the Districts as they were identified and continued to provide technical assistance for the upcoming team visits. In January 1997, a draft of the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties. The ECOE monitoring section of the report included information that identified technical assistance needs and resources available to the Cycle 1 schools. Technical assistance was provided during the January 29-31, 1997 Title I Mid-Winter Conference. The theme of the conference centered around the Improving America's Schools Act which emphasizes creating a learning community by building capacity schools to better serve all children and empowering parents to acquire additional skills and knowledge to better support the education of their children. 26 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) In February 1997, three ADE employees attended the Southeast Regional Conference on Educating Black Children which facilitated the ADE in identifying and obtaining technical assistance resources. The focus of the conference was Excellence Without Excuse - Educating All Children. Participants received training from national experts who outlined specific steps that promote and improve the education of black children. On March 6-9, 1997, three members of the ADE's Technical Assistance Section attended the National Committee for School Desegregation Conference in order to identify and obtain technical assistance resources for use in desegregation efforts. The participants received training in strategies for Excellence and Equity: Empowennent and Training for the Future. Specific information was received regarding the current status of court-ordered desegregation, unitary status, and resegregation and distributed to the Districts and ADE personnel. The field service specialists attended workshops in March on ACT testing and school improvement to identify technical assistance resources available to the Districts and the ADE that will facilitate desegregation efforts. ADE personnel attended the Eighth Annual Conference on Middle Level Education in Arkansas presented by the Arkansas Association of Middle Level Education on April 6-8, 1997 which identified technical assistance resources available to the Districts. The theme of the conference was Sailing Toward New Horizons. In May 1997, the field service specialists attended the NCA annual conference and an inservice session with Mutiu Fagbayi in their continuing efforts of identifying resources for providing technical assistance. An Implementation Oversight Committee member participated in the Consolidated COE Plan inservice training. In June 1997, field service staff attended a SAT-9 testing workshop to facilitate their efforts of identifying resources for providing technical assistance to the Districts. 27 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) In July 1997, the field service specialists participated in the three-day School Improvement Conference held in Hot Springs. The conference provided the Districts with information on the COE school improvement process, technical assistance on monitoring and assessing achievement, availability of technology for the classroom teacher, and teaching strategies for successful student achievement. In a continuing effort to identify and provide technical assistance resources to the Districts, Field Service personnel attended the ASCD Statewide Conference and the AAEA Administrators Conference in August 1997. On August 18, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held and presentations were made on the Early Literacy Leaming in Arkansas (ELLA) program and the Schools of the 21st Century program. The ELLA program provides staff development to classroom teachers with an emphasis on grades K-3. The Schools of the 21st Century program emphasizes a coordination of efforts and resources within the community to prepare children in their early years for school. In September 1997, technical assistance was provided to the Cycle 2 principals on data collection for onsite and offsite monitoring. In an effort to obtain resources for technical assistance, the Lead Planner, the Equity Coordinator, the Reading Specialist, and the Assistant Director for Accountability attended the Region VI Desegregation Conference in October 1997. Current desegregation and educational equity cases and unitary status issues were the primary focus of the conference. On October 14, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held in Paragould to enable members to observe a 21st Century school and a school that incorporates traditional and multi-age classes in its curriculum. 28 VII. TEST VALIDATION A. Using a collaborative approach, the ADE will select and contract with an independent bias review service or expert to evaluate the Stanford 8, or other monitoring instruments used to measure disparities in academic achievement between black students and white students. 1. Projected Ending Date March, 1995 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 On March 29, 1995, letters were sent to four national experts about conducting a test bias validation of the Stanford Achievement Test, Eighth Edition, Form K (SAT-8). Dr. Paul Williams, Deputy Director of Educational Testing Service (ETS), contacted the ADE in April of 1995 concerning the proposal for validating the SAT-8 test. The ADE requested that Dr. Williams conduct a validity study of test items used in the SAT-8. Dr. Williams submitted a final proposal for his services. The ADE Bias Review Test Committee met Friday, July 7, 1995, and approved Dr. William's contract proposal. The final contract was forwarded to Dr. Williams for his signature. The contract was signed in August 1995, thereby, completing this goal. B. By April 1994, establish a bias review committee to oversee the bias review process, and invite representatives of the Districts and parties to meet with the bias review committee. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Complete. ADE established a Bias Review Committee in April 1994. In accordance with the Implementation Plan, representatives from the Districts and the parties were invited to attend and participate in this and all meetings of the Bias Review Committee. 29 VII. TEST VALIDATION (Continued) C. Upon completion of test validation procedures by the bias review service or expert, the ADE will adopt and use a validated test as a monitoring instrument. 1. Projected Ending Date March 1995 and ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Dr. Paul Williams met with the staff of the Psychological Corporation to review their methods and procedures. In August 1995, he met with the staff at Georgia State University to review the statistical methods that would be used in the analysis. Dr. Williams reported difficulty with the bias-review study in receiving the names of the bias panel and the complete SAT-8 data set from the Psychological Corporation . Dr. Williams submitted an invoice totaling $8,961 for Task I activities of the SAT-8 validity study for partial fulfillment of the test validation study. On December 6, 1995, a contract extension for Dr. Williams was reviewed by the Legislative Council. In January 1996, he indicated that he was in the final stages of the test validation, and the ADE was presented a draft report in March 1996. In May 1996, Dr. Williams stated that the wrong data sets were sent to him by the Psychological Corporation resulting in Task 3 having to be redone. A new draft of the final report was received by the ADE in July 1996. In August 1996, copies of the test validation report were provided to the State Board of Education and the ADE administrative team for their review. On September 10, 1996, the LRSD notified the ADE that they had reviewed the test validation report and would like to meet with the ADE to discuss the report. The ADE Director indicated that he would schedule a meeting with the LRSD to discuss the report. In October 1996, historical files and data were provided to the ADE Director, the ADE Assistant Director for Technical Services, and the ADE Assistant Director for Planning and Curriculum for their review in preparation for a meeting with the LRSD regarding the validity study. 30 VII. TEST VALIDATION (Continued) C. Upon completion of test validation procedures by the bias review service or expert, the ADE will adopt and use a validated test as a monitoring instrument. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) Test validation procedures by the expert have been completed. A recommendation was drafted proposing the use of the SAT-8 by the ADE as the validated test for monitoring. The ADE is presently working to arrange a meeting with the Administration of the LRSD to discuss the test validation study. Effective September 22, 1997, the State Board of Education hired a new Director of the General Education Division, which should allow the ADE to move forward in this matter. In October 1997, the GED Director was updated on the history of the test validation process to provide the Director with background information in preparation for a meeting with the LRSD. 31 VIII. IN-SERVICE TRAINING A. Through an interactive process with representatives of desegregating districts, identify in-service training needs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section VIII.D. of this report. B. Develop in-service training programs to address in-service training needs of desegregating districts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section VIII.D. of this report. C. Implement in-service training programs to address in-service training needs of desegregating districts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section VIII.D. of this report. D. Evaluate in-service training programs developed and executed to address inservice training needs of desegregating districts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 32 VIII. IN-SERVICE TRAINING (Continued) D. Evaluate in-service training programs developed and executed to address inservice training needs of desegregating districts. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 In April 1995, the Tri-District Staff Development Committee were provided an overview of the Scott Alternative Learning Center's operation and met with students and staff. In May 1995, the Districts were in the process of self-assessment and planning for fall staff development. The Districts worked on staff development to be incorporated into their fall 95/96 preschool calendars. The uniqueness of each district's needs and their schools was considered in the planning by utilizing the results of needs assessment instruments. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on September 13, 1995 to plan for an ADE administered Classroom Management grant. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on September 19, 1995 to finalize the Classroom Management grant proposal. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on October 24, 1995 to discuss program and staff development evaluation models that might be available to the Districts. On November 15, 1995, the ADE met with an ODM representative to discuss the progress the ADE had made in attaining the objectives outlined in the Implementation Plan with regard to inservice training. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on November 21, 1995 to discuss upcoming training events and various NLR programs that focus on non-academic needs. A new program consisting of placing a graduate student of social work, a field supervisor, and a OHS worker in the district at no cost to the district was discussed. Additionally, NLR provided an overview of their program for credit deficient students. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on December 19, 1995 to discuss information dealing with ways to broaden the perspective of multicultural education. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on January 17, 1996 to discuss proposed changes in the standards regarding media centers and NLRSD's staff development strategic planning committee. The committee reviewed a video on diversity produced by the Arkansas Elementary Principals Association. 33 VIII. IN-SERVICE TRAINING (Continued) D. Evaluate in-service training programs developed and executed to address inservice training needs of desegregating districts. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on February 21, 1996 to discuss the implications of budget cuts on staff development programs and PCSSD's request for unitary status for their staff development program. The committee also discussed the need for computer literacy, technology training, and acquisition of hardware and software by the Districts. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on March 27, 1996 to discuss available resources concerning sexual harassment. ADE regulations in relation to staff members attending professional association conferences as well as the district staff development and potential sites for training seminars were also discussed. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on April 30, 1996 to discuss the reconfiguring of Jacksonville Junior High, PCSSD professional development schedules, and APSCN on-line timelines. A tour of the Washington Magnet school was also conducted. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee received a demonstration of UALR's Baum Decision Support Center's capabilities regarding consensus and planning on May 29, 1996. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee did not meet during September, October, and November 1996 because of scheduling conflicts and the extended medical leave of the ADE liaison. On December 18, 1996, the Tri-District Staff Development Committee met to discuss the linkage between the Implementation Plan, staff development, and student achievement. On January 21, 1997, the Tri-District Staff Development Committee met and discussed sharing middle school strategies and the Districts' training catalogs. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on February 25, 1997 to discuss their current staff development programs and an overview of the relationship of their current programs with their desegregation plans. 34 VIII. IN-SERVICE TRAINING (Continued) D. Evaluate in-service training programs developed and executed to address inservice training needs of desegregating districts. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on March 26, 1997 to observe the Great Expectations Program, a program designed to instill confidence and self-esteem in students at Bale Elementary, one of five schools in the LRSD participating in the program. The principal and mentor teachers provided information on the components and philosophy of the program, and students demonstrated selected components. The PCSSD may adopt the program for selected schools in their district. The committee was provided with an update of pertinent information on resources available to the Districts. The committee decided that the ADE liaison to the committee would gather documentation of completed staff development directly from the Districts, instead of the Districts providing this information at the committee meetings. New information on teacher licensure and rules and regulations was shared with the Tri-District Staff Development Committee at their April 1997 meeting. A report was presented to the committee on information from the Arkansas Council for Social Studies about an October 1997 meeting on integrated curriculum. The Districts will provide principal retreats this summer as a part of their staff development. The PCSSD will sponsor a renowned speaker on strategies to serve at risk youth in August 1997 in which the committee is invited to attend. The LRSD shared survey results from a pilot administration to four teachers in each district. The survey found the sample to be strong in content but lacking in context and process. Plans to address these needs will be developed. In another survey to certified and noncertified LRSD staff, stress management was the major concern. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on May 14, 1997 to participate in a teleconference with the five 1996 awardees of the National Awards Program for Model for Professional Development. The PCSSD shared their summer and fall staff development catalog with the members. The committee will reconvene in the fall of the 97/98 school year. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee is scheduled to meet on September 30, 1997 to discuss collaborative actions for FY 97/98. 35 VIII. IN-SERVICE TRAINING (Continued) D. Evaluate in-service training programs developed and executed to address inservice training needs of desegregating districts. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on September 30, 1997 to discuss their staff development for the 1997 /1998 school year. The PCSSD had a pre-school in-service for the faculty, and the LRSD conducted a Principals Academy with an expert on the math and science initiative which lasted several days. The NLRSD is providing staff development by satellite. 'fheTn-bistncfStaff~Develo-pmenf'committee met on October 28, ~ ~ - 1997. The LRSD and NLRSD shared some of their staff development course offerings with the c::pmmittee, and the PCSSD discussed ways of optimizing opportunities for staff development with specific ~mptiasiS..QIJ Jhejun.iQ[JJlgb,~q_hoq_l co_nflict reQlytion training. In November 1997, the Lead Planner provided technical assistance to the certified staff of Central High School regarding data disaggregation, test score analysis and ways to improve student achievement. 36 IX. RECRUITMENT OF MINORITY TEACHERS A. Facilitate communication between the Districts and Arkansas colleges and universities with teacher education programs. 1. Projected Ending Dates (See dates on individual key activities) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 A staff member of the ADE's certification department attended all of the college career days in FY 94/95 in Arkansas and one out-of-state. In FY 95/96, ADE certification staff members attended career and job fairs at the following colleges and universities: Philander Smith College\nUAM\nHSU\nATU\nUCA\nASU\nUA-Pine Bluff\nUA-Fayetteville\nHarding University\nSAU\nand Jackson State. ADE certification staff met with representatives from the Districts to ensure they were aware that ADE personnel were available to provide assistance in recruitment and certification of minority teacher candidates. A job fair was conducted at the University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff on December 4, 1996. The Districts were advised of the ADE's availability for providing assistance in recruitment and certification. In February 1997, ADE certification staff members attended teacher job fairs at Henderson State University, Arkansas Tech University, and University of Central Arkansas to facilitate communication between the Districts and Arkansas colleges and universities with teacher education programs. ADE certification staff members attended teacher job fairs at Harding University, UA-Fayetteville, UA-Pine Bluff, and ASU in April 1997 to facilitate communication between the Districts and Arkansas colleges and universities with teacher education programs. From April 16, 1997 through May 6, 1997, ADE certification staff members attended teacher job fairs at Philander Smith College and SAU to facilitate communication between the Districts and Arkansas colleges and universities with teacher education programs. Additionally, ADE staff attended an out-of-state teacher job fair at Jackson State University at Jackson, Mississippi. Recruitment activities were suspended for the summer, but they wi ll resume in the later part of September for FY 97/98. On September 25, 1997, the ADE's Professional Licensure Supervisor attended a career day job fair at Philander Smith College to provide support to the Districts in recruiting teachers. 37 IX. RECRUITMENT OF MINORITY TEACHERS (Continued) A. Facilitate communication between the Districts and Arkansas colleges and universities with teacher education programs. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) B. Beginning in 1994, by May and November of each year, Districts will supply to the ADE information about shortages of teachers by grade and subject area. 1. Projected Ending Dates Ongoing, as stated. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Letters were sent in May, August, and December 1995 to the Districts requesting information regarding teaching positions available by grade and subject areas. In May and November 1996, the Human Resources offices of the Districts were requested to provide information regarding teaching positions available by grade and subject area. On February 4, 1997, the ADE again requested that the Districts provide information to ADE regarding teacher shortages. During February 1997, the NLRSD and the PCSSD responded to the ADE regarding teacher shortages. NLRSD teacher shortages are expected in the areas of Special Education, Mathematics, the Sciences, Foreign Language, and English as a Second Language. PCSSD teacher shortages are anticipated in the areas of Foreign Language, Mathematics, the Sciences, and Gifted and Talented Education. On May 20, 1997, information was requested from the Districts regarding teacher shortages. Follow-up letters were sent to the Districts on July 11, 1997 requesting information on teacher shortages that was initially requested in May. 38 IX. RECRUITMENT OF MINORITY TEACHERS (Continued) C. Beginning in 1994, by May and December of each year, request information from colleges and universities about the numbers and types of minorityteacher graduates. D. 1. Projected Ending Dates Ongoing, as stated. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 In May and December 1995, letters were sent to all Deans and Certifying Officers of Institutions of Higher Education in Arkansas requesting information on minority teacher graduates. Letters were sent to all Deans and Certifying Officers of Institutions of Higher Education in Arkansas in May and November 1996 requesting information on minority teacher graduates. On May 20, 1997, letters were sent to all Arkansas colleges and universities with teacher education programs requesting minority teacher graduate information. Within 30 days of receiving data from colleges and universities provide the Districts data on teacher openings to the colleges and universities on minority graduates to the Districts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 In June 1995 and January 1996, ADE sent the information received from Arkansas colleges and universities on minority teacher education graduates to the Districts. In July 1996 and January 1997, ADE sent the information received from Deans and Certifying Officers on minority teacher education graduates to the Districts. On February 3, 1997, a list of minority teacher graduates from the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville was forwarded to the Districts. The information on these graduates was received after the initial list was compiled. The addition of these graduates was sent to the Districts as an addendum to the list of graduates compiled on January 16, 1997. 39 IX. RECRUITMENT OF MINORITY TEACHERS (Continued) D. Within 30 days of receiving data from colleges and universities provide the Districts data on teacher openings to the colleges and universities on minority graduates to the Districts. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) The ADE provided the Districts with the Minority Teacher Graduate Report which was compiled from the minority teacher graduate information received from Arkansas colleges and universities in July 1997. E. Each November, ADE will request information from the Districts on the effectiveness of ADE's minority recruitment assistance, including an assessment of the minority teacher candidates' database. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 On November 30, 1994, letters were sent to the Districts requesting feedback on the effectiveness of the ADE's minority recruitment assistance. Follow-up letters were sent on March 17, 1995 since no responses had been received. Additional follow-up letters were sent to the Districts in August 1995 because the ADE had received no responses from the Districts. A planning and evaluation meeting was scheduled on January 11, 1996 with representatives from the Districts. The Districts did not attend the meeting. In February 1997, letters were sent to the Districts requesting feedback on the effectiveness of ADE's minority recruitment assistance. The NLRSD and the PCSSD submitted favorable evaluations concerning the effectiveness of the ADE's recruitment assistance efforts. The ADE did not received any information from the LRSD regarding this matter. 40 X. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO MINORITY TEACHER CANDIDATES A. Assist ADHE in identifying, analyzing, addressing and eliminating racial disparities in the allocation of scholarships. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section X.D. of this report. B. Representatives of the ADE and the ADHE will work together, review ADHE's available data to identify racial disparities in allocation of scholarships. C. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section X.D. of this report. Using its knowledge about public schools, teacher education and certification, and through a collaborative effort with the Districts, ADE will analyze racial disparities in ADHE scholarship allocations. ADE will report its findings, conclusions, and recommendations about racial disparities in allocating scholarships to ADHE. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section X. D. of this report. D. Working with the ADHE, the ADE will use its relationships in the public education institutional settings to assist implementation of measures designed to reduce racial disparities in allocation of scholarships. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 41 X. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO MINORITY TEACHER CANDIDATES (Continued) D. Working with the ADHE, the ADE will use its relationships in the public education institutional settings to assist implementation of measures designed to reduce racial disparities in allocation of scholarships. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 In April 1995, ADE met with representatives of ADHE concerning identification and analysis of possible disparities in scholarship allocations. In June 1995, a collaborative effort was made between the ADE and ADHE to enhance the rate at which minorities were applying for the 1995 teacher scholarships with special emphasis on the areas of science, math, and foreign language through a direct mail program. In July 1995, representatives from the ADE and the Districts met to review the scholarship applications. The Implementation Committee on Financial Assistance to Minority Teacher Candidates discussed ways to increase minority awareness of the scholarships available for minority teacher applicants. The committee agreed to meet quarterly to identify, analyze, and address elfminating racial disparities in scholarships. The committee met in December 1995 to discuss the distribution of scholarships for the 95/96 school year. The committee meets on a continuous basis to review scholarship distributions and discuss ways of improving the pool of applicants for minority teacher scholarships as detailed further in Section X. E. of this report. E. Monitor the allocation of scholarships to minority students by the ADHE\nevaluate the impacts of new approaches and new legislation on an ongoing basis. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 During the May 1995 Legislative session, Acts 188, 189 and 259 regarding scholarships were passed. A meeting to monitor and analyze the distribution of scholarships for the 95/96 school year was held on December 15, 1995. 42 X. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO MINORITY TEACHER CANDIDATES (Continued) E. Monitor the allocation of scholarships to minority students by the ADHE\nevaluate the impacts of new approaches and new legislation on an ongoing basis. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) The committee met on June 7, 1996 to review the scholarship applications for minority teacher candidates for the 96/97 school year. Representatives from the ADHE stated that the ADHE expected to have the resources to fund: 56 scholarships under the Emergency Secondary Education Loan Program\n100 scholarships under the Minority Teacher Scholars Program\nand 13 scholarships under the Minority Masters Fellows Program. The committee also discussed ways of increasing the scholarship applicant pools, and a recommendation was made to make scholarships available to parttime students. In September 1996, a proposal was submitted to the Assistant to the Director for Legislative Services recommending the Legislature offer minority teacher scholarships to part-time students. The committee met on October 23, 1996 to review the scholarships awarded for the 96/97 school year. The following scholarships were funded: 60 scholarships totaling $144,266 for the Emergency Secondary Education Loan Program\n20 scholarships totaling $107,500 for the Minority Masters Fellows Program\n109 scholarships totaling $505,093 for the Minority Teacher Scholars Program\nand 258 students in the Freshman/Sophomore Minority Grant Program received scholarships totaling $374,000. In March 1997, information on minority teacher scholarships and how to apply was provided to the Districts and Arkansas colleges and universities. The Districts were informed of ADHE's scholarship promotional efforts and legislative updates. The next meeting of the committee will be in September 1997. On April 8, 1997, notifications were sent to all Arkansas colleges and universities on the Minority Teacher Scholars Program reminding them that the deadline for receiving applications was June 1, 1997. This information was also provided to the Districts. The Minority Teacher Scholarship Committee will meet on October 9, 1997 to discuss the scholarships awarded for FY 97/98. 43 X. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO MINORITY TEACHER CANDIDATES (Continued) E. Monitor the allocation of scholarships to minority students by the ADHE\nevaluate the impacts of new approaches and new legislation on an ongoing basis. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) The Minority Teacher Scholarship Recruitment Committee met on October 9, 1997 to discuss the scholarships awarded for FY 97/98. The ADHE Assistant Coordinator for Student Financial Aid provided a comprehensive presentation on scholarships awarded for the 97 /98 school year. There were 235 scholarships awarded in the Freshman/Sophomore Minority Scholarship program totaling $344,988. The Emergency Secondary Education Loan program awarded 52 scholarships for a total of $119,370. There were 83 scholarships for $403,520 awarded in the Minority Teachers Scholars program. The Minority Masters Fellows program awarded 20 scholarships for a total of $73,750. The ADHE representative indicated that during the 1997 regular legislative session legislation was passed to allow hispanics and asians to participate in the minority scholarship programs. It was stated that the average GPA for minority teacher scholarship recipients had increased to 3.13, and that the dollars awarded in the Minority Masters Fellows program were down from last year because most of the recipients were part-time students. The committee discussed numerous avenues that might be utilized to inform minority applicants of scholarships available. Communication with the faculty of Arl\u0026lt;ansas colleges and universities regarding the availability of scholarships was discussed as a way of infom,ing teaching students of possible resources available to them. The next quarterly meeting of the Minority Teacher Scholarship Recruitment Committee will be February 19, 1998. 44 XI. MINORITY RECRUITMENT OF ADE STAFF A. Administer the ADE Minority Recruitment Plan developed by the ADE staff and Board of Education and officially adopted by the Board of Education (see Exhibit B for the ADE's Minority Recruitment Plan with specific objectives and timelines). 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The Minority Recruitment Committee met on Friday, April 14, 1995. New committee members were assigned tasks and goals to increase the effectiveness of the Minority Recruitment Plan. At the Minority Recruitment Committee meeting on May 18, 1995, the committee was divided into four working sub-teams to update the annual plan. Each team focused on one of the four goals in the Minority Recruitment Plan and monitored specific task completions. From June to October 1995, subcommittees met and worked on monitoring the progress of the ADE in accomplishing the tasks outlined in the Minority Recruitment Plan. In September 1995, the ADE reached an agreement with the Arkansas Statewide Systemic Initiative (ASSI) for conducting an audit of the Minority Recruitment Plan. The committee reviewed the recommendations and comments for updating the plan at the November 1995 meeting and reviewed the final draft at the December meeting. The ASSl's audit findings were presented to the committee on January 16, 1996. It was determined during the initial review that the files were incomplete to the extent that an accurate audit was not possible. The auditor met with the committee in March 1996 to review the additional documentation in the files. The auditor prepared the final report in April 1996 indicating that of the 89 actions contained in the Minority Recruitment Plan, 74 of the items had been completed, nine were in progress, and six had not been started. The audit stated that of the 22 items in Goal 1, 15 were completed , one was in progress, and six had not been started. Goal 2 contained 14 items, 13 of which were completed and one in progress. Goal 3 consisted of 30 items with 29 items completed and one in progress. Goal 4 consisted of 23 items with 17 items completed and six in progress. 45 XI. MINORITY RECRUITMENT OF ADE STAFF (Continued) A. Administer the ADE Minority Recruitment Plan developed by the ADE staff and Board of Education and officially adopted by the Board of Education (see Exhibit B for the ADE's Minority Recruitment Plan with specific goals, objectives and timelines). (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) The Minority Recruitment Committee met on June 6, 1996 to discuss updates and revisions addressed in the audit and the new racial/gender report on Grades 21 and above. Since the completion of the audit, Goals 2.3.4 and 3.3.8 were completed, and a list of recommendations for retention activities was written. Also, a random sample of ADE employees was asked to fill out questionnaires, but only a limited number were returned. In August 1996, the Minority Recruitment Committee met and discussed the actions necessary to complete Goals 1 and 4 contained in the Minority Recruitment Plan. At the September 1996 meeting, the committee was updated on the progress of all four goals in the Minority Recruitment Plan. The committee heard an analysis of application and hiring practices and discussed the relevance of the data. Suggestions made by the State Board of Education regarding the Employee Tracking Data Check Sheet were discussed at the February 1996 meeting of the Minority Recruitment Committee. Goal 1 of the Minority Recruitment Plan will be completed when the employee tracking sheet is finalized. The Minority Recruitment Committee met on March 14, 1997 and March 27, 1997 to discuss the draft Revised Minority Recruitment Plan and progress toward completing Goal 4. The committee passed a motion to omit Section 1.1 from Goal 1 of the draft revised plan. Additionally, the committee suggested that communication be made an integral part of each goal of the revised plan. The committee discussed the need for professional training programs, incentives for educational opportunities, and upward mobility for all staff within the ADE. In an effort to complete Goal 4, a representative from the ADE communication section presented development costs for media materials to the committee. Additionally, a representative from the ADE MIS section discussed the possibility of using the network to disseminate information to employees. It was suggested that the committee continue to receive assistance from MIS on the orientation video. 46 XI. MINORITY RECRUITMENT OF ADE STAFF (Continued) A. Administer the ADE Minority Recruitment Plan developed by the ADE staff and Board of Education and officially adopted by the Board of Education (see Exhibit B for the ADE's Minority Recruitment Plan with specific goals, objectives and timelines). (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued} In an effort to represent all sections within the ADE, the committee recommended that representatives from the ADE communication and MIS sections be added as members to the committee. Currently, neither section is represented on the committee. The Minority Recruitment Committee met on April 18, 1997 to discuss the need to revise the action steps for each of the committee's four goals. The committee decided to schedule a two-day retreat in an effort to review all goals and actions. The Minority Recruitment Committee met on May 19, 1997 to discuss the agenda for the annual retreat and revisions to the action plan emphasizing recruitment and retention at all grade levels. A two-day annual retreat was held on June 18-19, 1997 at the Teacher Retirement Building. The retreat facilitated the revision of the Minority Recruitment Committee's action plan for their four goals. Dr. Gary Chamberlain, UALR faculty member, served as the facilitator. The revised plan was distributed to the Minority Recruitment Committee at their July 18, 1997 meeting for final approval before it is submitted to the administrative team and the State Board of Education. The Minority Recruitment Committee meeting scheduled for September 12, 1997 was rescheduled for September 30, 1997 due to members scheduling conflicts. The meeting will be reported in the November PMT. !the Minorily'7Recruitmen Committee met wifh fhe ADE Deputy pirector i~ November 1997 to provide him w~IJ..@-copy of th~ revised plan and fe,_~iye_his i11pJ.Jt .Qn the plan. B. Monitor minority representation at all levels of ADE and assess the effectiveness of the ADE Minority Recruitment Plan. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 47 XI. MINORITY RECRUITMENT OF ADE STAFF (Continued) 8. Monitor minority representation at all levels of ADE and assess the effectiveness of the ADE Minority Recruitment Plan. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 As of August 1995, the ADE had hired or transferred 38 employees in Grades 21 and above in the General Education Division. This group was composed of 11 black females, 5 black males, 16 white females, 4 white males, 1 other female, and 1 other male. The racial composition of the these employees was 52.6 percent non-minority and 47.4 percent minority. As of October 1995, there were 161 filled positions in the GED in Grades 21 and above. There were 27 minorities or 22.9 percent in Grades 21 and above. An analysis on Goal 1 regarding application and hiring practices was presented at the September 1996 meeting. Samples of graphs and tables for presenting the data were distributed at the meeting. The Minority Recruitment Committee met on December 13, 1996 to discuss the latest draft of the ADE Employee Tracking Data Check Sheet. The committee recommended various format changes including the addition of a table of contents and an executive summary. The committee met on January 17, 1997 to continue the discussion on the draft ADE Employee Tracking Data Check Sheet. The Assistant Director for Planning and Curriculum agreed with all but three of the committee's recommendations for the employee tracking sheet. He requested that the committee continue discussions on this matter. The Minority Recruitment Committee met on February 14, 1997 to discuss the status of the Employee Tracking Data Check Sheet. The employee tracking sheet will enable the committee to monitor the recruitment and retention of minority employees by unit and section at every grade level and monitor minority representation at all grade levels within the ADE. The committee also discussed the lack of minority employees in some areas and the loss of several minority employees. There were also discussions regarding the possibility of revising the new Minority Recruitment Plan that has been submitted to the ADE administrative team. 48 XI. MINORITY RECRUITMENT OF ADE STAFF (Continued) B. Monitor minority representation at all levels of ADE and assess the effectiveness of the ADE Minority Recruitment Plan. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) The committee received information on Arkansas pupil enrollment by race at their March 14, 1997 meeting. Arkansas enrollment figures for October 1, 1996 revealed that 73. 7% of all students are white, 23.4% are black, 1.8% are hispanic, 0.7% are asian, and 0.4% are native american. In an effort to assess the effectiveness of the action steps for each goal, agenda items are being developed for the committee's June retreat. The committee recommended that invitations be sent to Senator Beebe, Julie Cullen, Gene Wilhoit, and all State Board members. At the May 1997 Minority Recruitment Committee meeting, the committee discussed reviewing the most recent quarterly hiring and retention report and revisions to the action plan at the annual retreat. Discussions during the July retreat focused on the current plan, the original purpose of the plan, and necessary changes with input provided by committee members and speakers from the Arkansas Department of Higher Education, Employment Securities, and the ADE. 49 XII. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION A. Improve the effectiveness of the ADE's existing rules, regulations, and site evaluation form for assessing the desegregation impacts of school construction between school districts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section XII.C. of this report. B. Review existing rules, regulations and site evaluation forms and their application to school construction projects within districts and between districts. 1. Projected Ending Date October 1994 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for th is item is detailed under Section XII.C. of this report. C. Amend the rules, regulations and site evaluation forms as they apply to all districts contiguous to the three Pulaski County school districts to assure that the school construction analysis specifically addresses the impacts on racial balances of individual school sites within the three districts. 1. Projected Ending Date October 1994 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 ADE's School Site Selection Committee met on April 21, 1995 to revise the proposed rules and regulations. The proposed rules and regulations were presented to the State Board of Education on May 8, 1995. The Board voted to table the decision on public comment until the proposed rules and regulations were reviewed by the Attorney General's Office. The Attorney General's Office reviewed the revised school construction draft and provided a letter of approval. 50 XII. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION (Continued) C. Amend the rules, regulations and site evaluation forms as they apply to all districts contiguous to the three Pulaski County school districts to assure that the school construction analysis specifically addresses the impacts on racial balances of individual school sites within the three districts. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) On June 12, 1995, the State Board of Education voted to place the revised School Site Approval rules and regulations for public comment. The hearing was held on June 19, 1995 in the ADE Auditorium, and a copy of the revised draft was sent to all school districts in an ADE Director's Memo. Proposed rules and regulations underwent a third revision and were presented to the Board in July 1995 with a request for final approval. The revised rules and regulations were approved by the State Board of Education on July 10, 1995. On August 3, 1995, the proposed School Site Approval rules and regulations were reviewed by the Legislative Council. Due to questions raised by the staff attorney for the Legislative Council, the council voted to defer review until their next meeting so that additional information could be obtained to resolve the questioned items. The proposed School Site Approval rules and regulations were reviewed by the Legislative Council on September 7, 1995 and went into effect on September 8, 1995. Goal completed. No additional reporting required. 51 XIII. ASSIST PCSSD A. Detennine if the PCSSD wants and needs assistance in lowering the cost of Black History course offerings to its certified staff. 8. 1. Projected Ending Date April, 1994 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 A letter was mailed to the desegregation director of the PCSSD on March 16, 1995 regarding offering assistance in facilitating a special arrangement with colleges and universities for reducing the cost of a black history course offering to the PCSSD certified staff. In a letter dated April 3, 1995, the PCSSD responded that their staff development director was working with UALR to develop the black history course offerings. No additional assistance was requested of the ADE. Goal completed as of June 1995. If PCSSD wants assistance, communicate with local colleges and universities to facilitate the Black History course offerings to PCSSD teachers at the lower costs possible. 1. Projected Ending Date September 1994 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 UALR informed the ADE that they had contacted PCSSD regarding their willingness to provide non-credit black history studies for the PCSSD. UALR indicated that as of November 11, 1994 they had received no response from the PCSSD. Two universities offered assistance in providing teachers in the PCSSD a black history course. The ADE had not received requests for any assistance with the facilitation of a black history course in the PCSSD as of February 27, 1995. On April 3, 1995, the PCSSD informed ADE that its staff development director was working with UALR to develop the black history course offering. No additional assistance was requested of the ADE. 52 XIV. SCATTERED SITE HOUSING A. Through Executive Branch communication procedures, ADE will inquire about State land holdings in Pulaski County and about the availability of State land holdings for use as building sites for scattered-site housing. 1. Projected Ending Date Not applicable. 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The ADE had previously inquired about State land holdings in Pulaski County and about availability of State land holdings for use as building sites for scattered site housing. All materials were distributed to the appropriate district representatives. There has been no contact with the PCSSD on Scattered Site Housing since July 1995. Goal completed. No additional reporting required. 53 xv. STANDARDIZED TEST SELECTION TO DETERMINE LRSD LOAN FORGIVENESS A Meet with and propose to the representatives of the LRSD that the current Stanford 8 standardized test, following a bias-free validation study, be used to measure the District's progress toward meeting the loan forgiveness thresholds of the Settlement Agreement. 1 . Projected Ending Date May 1994 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 On April 21, 1995, a letter was sent to the LRSD Superintendent suggesting meeting dates to discuss the variables which affect student achievement. On May 1, 1995, the ADE Director was advised of the need to discuss the selection of the SAT-8 to measure the LRSD's progress toward meeting the loan forgiveness threshold of the Settlement Agreement. On May 21, 1995, the ADE staff discussed the status of the selection of the test relevant to the ADE's Implementation Plan. The Variables Committee, a subcommittee of the Test Selection Committee, received evaluations on the relationship of the various types of scores that could be used on the SA T-8 Test. The Variables Committee recommended using the state-adopted norm referenced test to determine the achievement levels of black and white students. Based on the evaluations, they indicated that scaled scores or raw scores would appear to be the better metrics to use for this purpose. The recommendation from the Variables Committee was submitted to the Test Selection Committee and the ADE Director on July 28, 1995. Until the test validation has been completed, no additional progress can occur on this objective. For the progress being made on the test validation process see Section VII. of this report. In August 1996, copies of the test validation report were provided to the State Board of Education and the ADE administrative team. Additionally, the LRSD Director of Planning, Research and Evaluation was provided a copy of the test validation report. 54 XV. STANDARDIZED TEST SELECTION TO DETERMINE LRSD LOAN FORGIVENESS (Continued) A. Meet with and propose to the representatives of the LRSD that the current Stanford 8 standardized test, following a bias-free validation study, be used to measure the Districts' progress toward meeting the loan forgiveness thresholds of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) On September 10, 1996, the LRSD notified the ADE that the district had reviewed the test validation report and would like to meet with the ADE to discuss the report. The Director of the ADE indicated that he would schedule a meeting with the LRSD to discuss the report. In October 1996, historical files and data were provided to the Director of the ADE, ADE Assistant Director of Technical Assistance, and ADE Assistant Director of Planning and Curriculum for their review in preparation for the meeting with the LRSD regarding the validity study. In February 1997, a memorandum was sent to the Assistant Directors of Technical Assistance and Planning and Curriculum which summarized the test validation and variables subcommittee work and outlined the next step of formalizing an agreement with the LRSD on the use of the SAT-8 and the choice of raw or scaled scores as the metric. Effective September 22, 1997, the State Board of Education hired a new Director of the General Education Division, which should allow ADE to move forward in this matter. In October 1997, the GED Director was updated on the history of the test validation process to provide the Director with background information in preparation for a meeting with the LRSD. 55 XVI. MONITOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLANS A. Fully implement the Extended COE Improvement Plan Process in all schools in the three Pulaski County school districts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section XVI.D. of this report. 8 . Conduct the Extended COE School Improvement Plan peer review process in 20% of the schools each year (every school every five years) and provide peer review team recommendations to the schools reviewed. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section XVI. D. of this report. C. Receive from all schools, annual reports on progress toward meeting recommendations of School Improvement Plans. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section XVI.D\nof this report. D. Follow-up and assist schools that have difficulty realizing their school improvement objectives. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 In June 1995, ADE personnel reviewed the Extended COE packet and prepared for holistic reviews of the Cycle 5 schools. 56 XVI. MONITOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLANS (Continued) D. Follow-up and assist schools that have difficulty realizing their school improvement objectives. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 In July 1995, year-end reports were finalized by the field service specialists. Plans to conduct holistic reviews of the draft school improvement plans of the Cycle 5 schools, and plans for the 95/96 school year were discussed. In August 1995, holistic reviews of the Cycle 5 school improvement plans were conducted. A school improvement conference was conducted, and documentation for technical review visits in the 95/96 school year was discussed. In October 1995, computer programs used by Effective Schools proponents were ordered for review, and a draft monitoring checklist for ECOE was developed. In November 1995, two meetings were held to plan for 95/96 monitoring. Onsite visits were conducted to prepare schools for the FY 95/96 team visits, and technical review visits continued in the Districts. In December 1995, technical assistance visits were conducted, and monitoring occurred in all schools in the Districts. As of December 31, 1996, approximately 59% of the schools in the Districts had been monitored, and technical review visits continued. In February 1996, announced monitoring visits in the Districts were completed. The field service specialists completed the midyear monitoring reports and prepared for the spring NCA/COE peer team visits. In March 1996, unannounced visits and peer team two-day visits of Cycle 5 schools were conducted. Written reports of two-day team visits were prepared, and field service specialists provided assistance to schools on their school improvement plans. In April and May 1996, unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and monitoring forms were scanned for inclusion in the July monitoring report. Team visits were completed, and the annual COE monitoring reports were prepared. 57 XVI. MONITOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLANS (Continued) D. Follow-up and assist schools that have difficulty realizing their school improvement objectives. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) In June 1996, the data from the announced and unannounced monitoring visits of the Cycle 5 schools was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Semiannual Monitoring Report was filed with the Court, and copies were distributed to the parties. Information was included on cost and enrollment in compensatory programs. All school improvement plans were monitored in the Cycle 5 schools. Reports regarding the two day team visits were included in the Semiannual Monitoring Report. In August 1996, meetings were held with the Districts regarding announced monitoring requirements. Technical assistance meetings with Cycle 1 schools were planned for 96/97. The Districts were requested to record discipline data in accordance with the Allen Letter. In September 1996, recommendations on the monitoring schedule and content layouts of the semiannual report were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. Training materials were developed with tentative training schedules outlined for Cycle 1 schools. In October 1996, a meeting was held with the Districts to identify, update, and modify the schools in Cycles 1 - 5. Monitoring packets for the Cycle 1 schools were presented during the Principal's Monitoring Workshops. Technical assistance was provided to the Cycle 1 schools regarding their school improvement goals. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996, and technical assistance was provided to schools in realizing the goals established in their school improvement plans. In December 1996, the field service representatives completed the announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools and provided assistance to the schools in achieving their school improvement goals. The ECOE monitoring reports on the Cycle 1 school improvement plans were included in the Semiannual Monitoring Report and presented to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties in January 1997. 58 XVI. MONITOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLANS (Continued) D. Follow-up and assist schools that have difficulty realizing their school improvement objectives. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) In February 1997, the field service specialists prepared for the spring peer team visits of the Cycle 1 schools and prepared the annual NCA reports. The NLRSD Cycle 1 ECOE team visits were completed in March 1997. Cycle 5 schools submitted their progress reports from their FY 95/96 team visits, and the outcomes will be reviewed and compiled for inclusion in the PMT after all have been received. Assistance was provided to the Districts based on the results of monitoring visits and specific requests. Team visits were completed in April 1997 for the PCSSD. The LRSD prepared for their team visits, and Cycle 5 school progress reports were received. Assistance was provided to the Districts based on the monitoring reports and specific requests. An expanded team meeting of Team Vwas held on April 7, 1997 to provide training for monitoring activities and evaluating school improvement plans during team visits. A presentation was made on Act 338 of 1991 . ECOE team visits were scheduled, and all Cycle 1 peer team external visits were conducted as of May 1997. Assistance was provided based on the results of the monitoring visits and specific requests. As of June 1997, all Cycle 1 schools had their ECOE team reports provided to them for their review, and information was mailed to the Cycle 5 schools regarding their progress reports. Assistance was provided based on information received in progress reports or specific requests. The July 15-17, 1997 School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs and emphasized the COE school improvement process. The conference focused on Phase II of COE and the need for the continuation of school improvement. The field service specialists provided technical assistance throughout the conference on school improvement activities and plans and answered questions from delegates. As of August 1997, dates for the ECOE team visits of the Cycle 2 schools were established for FY 97/98, and progress reports were in the final stages. Technical assistance was provided as progress reports were evaluated and when specific requests were made. 59 XVI. MONITOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLANS (Continued) D. Follow-up and assist schools that have difficulty realizing their school improvement objectives. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) Technical assistance was provided to the Cycle 2 principals at the Desegregation Monitoring and School Improvement Workshop held on September 10, 1997. In October 1997, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted along with the announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 2 schools. The field service representatives discussed the ECOE process with principals, ECOE steering committees, and faculty and worked with teachers on analyzing perceptual surveys. Additionally, the field service representatives emphasized the need for a database on achievement and provided guidance regarding their school improvement plans. fn November 1997, teclinfcai reviews 'of the- ECOE process'were conducted along with the announced mon~ori,ng v)sits of the Cycle 2 schools. 60 XVII. DATA COLLECTION A. Through the School Improvement Plan annual reporting and monitoring process, collect, analyze and monitor data required in the May 31, 1989 Monitoring Plan. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 Data was collected in May 1995 from all schools during the unannounced visits. Information that was unavailable during the announced visits was collected during the unannounced monitoring visits. In June 1995, data was collected from the Districts and analyzed for inclusion in the July Semiannual Monitoring Report. In July 1995, data from perceptual surveys was reviewed. In August 1995, the data elements to be reviewed and the data collection process for FY 95/96 were articulated to the Districts. In September 1995, the data collection format for the 95/96 school year was distributed to the Districts. Financial information for FY 93/94 and FY 94/95 was requested from the Districts, and principals were given inservice training regarding FY 95/96 monitoring. The Districts provided fourth quarter data on discipline, testing, nonpromotes, and budget for inclusion in the February 1996 Semiannual Monitoring Report. A workshop to develop a common terminology for monitoring purposes was conducted on October 17, 1995 with the Districts. The workshop identified the data available in the Districts to fulfill the requirements of the Allen Letter's 14 elements. The group correlated the data elements to the five monitoring forms. Monitoring data was verified for inclusion in the February Semiannual Monitoring Report. Data on nonpromotes was analyzed for inclusion in the February Semiannual Monitoring Report. Announced monitoring visits began on November 14, 1995. The preliminary February Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were presented to the ADE administrative team and the State Board of Education. Announced monitoring visits were completed on January 26, 1996. Unannounced monitoring visits began in late February 1996 for the Cycle 5 schools in the Districts and were completed in April 1996. 61 XVII. DATA COLLECTION (Continued) A. Through the School Improvement Plan annual reporting and monitoring process, collect, analyze and monitor data required in the May 31 , 1989 Monitoring Plan. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) A supplemental report to the February 1, 1996 Semiannual Monitoring Report was filed with the Court on April 8, 1996. Data requests for information were forwarded to the Districts. Information was reviewed, analyzed, and formatted for inclusion in the July Semiannual Monitoring Report. The data received from the Districts was analyzed and reviewed. Instructional program reporting was clarified after the Districts and ADE desegregation staff collaboratively established a definition. All data collected for the July 1996 Semiannual Report was disaggregated, analyzed, and displayed in color graphic form for reporting. In August 1996, the Districts were provided with the monitoring requirements and expectations for the 96/97 school year. In September 1996, arrangements were made for data collection, and monitoring formats were revised. Technical assistance was provided to the LRSD on data collection and formatting of certified staffing data. Monitoring packets for the Cycle 1 schools were developed in October 1996 and presented during the Principal's Monitoring Workshops. In November 1996, data specified by the Allen Letter was received, reviewed, and formatted for the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report. In December 1996, the remainder of the quantitative data specified in the Allen Letter was reviewed and formatted for inclusion in the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report. The Semiannual Monitoring Report was finalized in January 1997 and presented to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee of the Arkansas General Assembly, and the parties. In February 1997, the Lead Planning and Desegregation Monitoring Section developed the format for the July 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and obtained Cycle 1 SAT-9 test data from the ADE's Assessment Section. 62 XVII. DAT A COLLECTION (Continued) A. Through the School Improvement Plan annual reporting and monitoring process, collect, analyze and monitor data required in the May 31, 1989 Monitoring Plan. (Continued) 2. Actual as of November 28, 1997 (Continued) In March 1997, data forms were sent to the Districts to assist with the submission of information for the July Semiannual Monitoring Report. Some data was collected through existing reports submitted by the Districts for the annual report. In April 1997, the Districts were notified that the deadline for data collection submission was April 24, 1997. ADE desegregation staff received training on software useful in desegregation reporting. As of May 14, 1997, all data was received from the Districts. In June 1997, the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were finalized and presented to the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee on June 25, 1997. In July 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were filed with the Court and copies were distributed to the State Board of Education and the parties. In August 1997, data requirements for the February 1998 monitoring report were sent to the Districts. In September 1997, Cycle 2 principals and the Districts' superintendents were provided with the data requirements for monitoring and data analysis. In October 1997, the financial information requested for inclusion in the February 1998 monitoring report was received from the Districts. 63 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Timothy Gauger, certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served by first class mail on this 25th day ofNovember, 1997, on the following person(s) at the address(es) indicated: M. Samuel Jones, III Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 2000 Boatmen's Bank Bldg. 200 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Richard Roachell Roachell \u0026amp; Street 401 W. Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Ann Brown ODM 201 E. Markham, Ste. 510 Little Rock, AR 72201 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DMSION JAN 5 199B OfFICE OF DESEGREGATION M0NITORJNQ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF v. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of ADE's Project Management Tool for December, 1997. Respectfully Submitted, WINSTON BRYANT Attorney General Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 682-2007 Attorney for Arkansas Department of Education IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 8. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 C. Process and distribute State MFPA. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of December 31 , 1997 ~ NOV!!Jl~t 1997, 9istnbutiQ[IL\u0026lt;\u0026gt;t St!'@EsfuaJi?\nitiqn 1:_un.~ih9. foJ,.E.Y ~ll98 were ~s f9ll0~: LRSD- $15,293,336 NfRSD:. $8,824,2\u0026amp;,\\ PCSSD-$20,149,352 iThe allotments of State Equalization Funding calculated for FY 97/98 ~t November 3Q, 1997, subject tQ periodic adjustments, were as follows: CR\"sD - $42,056,681 ~LRSO -0$24,266,733 PC.SSD -$55,41..0,722 D. Determine the number of Magnet students residing in each District and attending a Magnet School. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of December 31 , 1997 eased on_ the information available, the ADE calculated at November 80, 1997(or FY 97/~8, sul?_ject to periodic aclj!,l~tments. 2 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as ordered by the Court. 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 F. Calculate state aid due the LRSD based upon the Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date 2. Last day of each month, August - June. Actual as of December 31, 1997 13ased_.~m) Qe informati~ availa6ie, t ~,7'-1:fE,JalcOlateaffat NQYeQ1bfil !f0,i1997 for FY 9]/9,!!,\n:.subject !2 periopif aojustments. G. Process and distribute state aid for Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 Distributions for FY 97/98 at November 32, 1997 totaled $3,273,756. ~llotment calculated at November 1997 for FY 97/98 was\"$9\n002,821 , subject to 'periodic agju~!ments. =- -~ -\" . M - -- H. Calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school district is entitled. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 3 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) H. Calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school district is entitled. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. J . 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, September - June. 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 Qistri6ution.sJQ(E.Y. 977gs a_rr:.to,i.E! 99,7\ntwer~: l!'RSD ._.,,$-1, 064\".'439 NLRSD - $434,833 i:\u0026gt;csso- $1)4s.zo2 !fhe allotments calculated for FY\"\"97/98 at Nov~oer\"30: 1~97, subject to periodic ~djustments, were: LRSD- $3,548,125 NLRSD - $1,416,112 PC_SD - $5,82,2,342 Districts submit an estimated Magnet and M-to-M transportation budget to ADE. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, December of each year. 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 In September 1997, the Magnet and M-to-M transportation budgets for FY 97/98 were submitted to the ADE by the Districts. K. Reginald Wilson notifies General Finance to pay districts for first two-thirds of the Districts' proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 4 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) K. Reginald Wilson notifies General Finance to pay districts for first two-thirds of the Districts' proposed budget. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 In September 1997, General Finance was notified to pay the first onethird payments for FY 97/98 to the Districts. It should be noted that the Transportation Coordinator is currently performing this function. L. ADE pays districts for first two-thirds of their proposed budget. M. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 In September 1~7, General FipF,ice, \"J_aciethe ~_[st one-thlro ~a.yment~ to the Qi~trict~J2r their,FY: 9,7/98 tra!!p.Qrt~tiol budget ~! Nov~ffi!:\u0026gt;.er 1~fil,Jh~ folfowiQg ha''o't\neen p1Ja~forJ::Y:El't98: ~ RSD-$1,019,861.33 LRSD- $141,696.00 CSSD,.:,.153(?,541 QQ ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 In August 1997, the ADE transportation coordinator reviewed each district's Magnet and M-to-M transportation costs for FY 96/97. N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as stated in Exhibit A of the Implementation Plan. 5 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 In FY 94/95, the State purchased 52 buses at a cost of $1 ,799,431 which were added to or replaced existing Magnet and M-to-M buses in the Districts. The buses were distributed to the Districts as follows: LRSD - 32\nNLRSD - 6\nand PCSSD - 14. The ADE purchased 64 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $2,334,800 in FY 95/96. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 45\nNLRSD - 7\nand PCSSD- 12. In May 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $646,400. In July 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $624,879. 0 . Process and distribute compensatory education payments to LRSD as required by page 23 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 and January 1, of each school year through January 1, 1999. 2. Actual as of December 31 , 1997 Obligation fulfilled in FY 96/97. P. Process and distribute additional payments in lieu of formula to LRSD as required by page 24 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of December 31 , 1997 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. 6 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) Q. Process and distribute payments to PCSSD as required by Page 28 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1994. 2. Actual as of December 31 , 1997 Final payment was distributed July 1994. R. Upon loan request by LRSD accompanied by a promissory note, the ADE makes loans to LRSD. S. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing through July 1, 1999. See Settlement Agreement page 24. 2. Actual as of December 31 , 1997 The LRSD received $3,000,000 in June 1997. As of this reporting date, the LRSD has received $15,000,000 in loan proceeds. Process and distribute payments in lieu of formula to PCSSD required by page 29 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. T. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to NLRSD as required by page 31 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 of each school year through June 30, 1996. 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. 7 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) U. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 97/98. V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. 1. Projected Ending Date Not applicable. 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 97/98. 8 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. 1. Projected Ending Date January 15, 1995 2. Actual as of December 31 , 1997 In May 1995, monitors completed the unannounced visits of schools in Pulaski County. The monitoring process involved a qualitative process of document reviews, interviews, and observations. The monitoring focused on progress made since the announced monitoring visits. In June 1995, monitoring data from unannounced visits was included in the July Semiannual Report. Twenty-five per cent of all classrooms were visited, and all of the schools in Pulaski County were monitored. All principals were interviewed to determine any additional progress since the announced visits. The July 1995 Monitoring Report was reviewed by the ADE administrative team, the Arkansas State Board of Education, and the Districts and filed with the Court. The report was formatted in accordance with the Allen Letter. In October 1995, a common terminology was developed by principals from the Districts and the Lead Planning and Desegregation staff to facilitate the monitoring process. The announced monitoring visits began on November 14, 1995 and were completed on January 26, 1996. Copies of the preliminary Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the ADE administrative team and the State Board of Education in January 1996. A report on the current status of the Cycle 5 schools in the ECOE process and their school improvement plans was filed with the Court on February 1, 1996. The unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1996 and ended on May 10, 1996. 9 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 (Continued) In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and the data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Districts provided data on enrollment in compensatory education programs by race, gender, and type of program. The Districts and the ADE Desegregation Monitoring staff developed a definition for instructional programs. The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996 with copies distributed to the parties. Quantitative and qualitative indicators were displayed with specific information provided on cost and enrollment in compensatory programs. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996 and concluded in December 1996. In January 1997, presentations were made to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties to review the draft Semiannual Monitoring Report. The monitoring instrument and process were evaluated for their usefulness in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on achievement disparities. In February 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was filed. Unannounced monitoring visits began on February 3, 1997 and concluded in May 1997. In March 1997, letters were sent to the Districts regarding data requirements for the July 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and the additional discipline data element that was requested by the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Desegregation data collection workshops were conducted in the Districts from March 28, 1997 to April 7, 1997. A meeting was conducted on April 3, 1997 to finalize plans for the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report. Onsite visits were made to 11 Cycle 1 schools who did not submit accurate and timely data on discipline, M-to-M transfers, and policy. 10 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 (Continued) As of June 1997, the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were finalized. In July 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were filed with the court, and the ADE sponsored a School Improvement Conference. Copies of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were made available for the Districts to review on July 10, 1997 from 10:00 am to 2:00 pm. The purpose of the review was to provide the Districts an opportunity to review the report prior to submitting it to the Court. Desegregation monitoring staff members were available to answer questions. Representatives from each district participated. In August 1997, procedures and schedules were organized for the monitoring of the Cycle 2 schools in FY 97/98. A Desegregation Monitoring and School Improvement Workshop for 55 educators from the Districts was held September 10, 1997. Monitoring expectations, instruments, data collection and school improvement visits were discussed. As of October 1997, 10 of the Cycle 2 announced monitoring visits were completed, and 36 technical assistance visits were conducted. On October 9, 1997, a planning meeting was held with the desegregation monitoring staff. Deadlines, responsibilities, and strategic planning issues were discussed regarding the completion of the Semiannual Monitoring Report. Reminder letters were sent to the Cycle 2 principals outlining the data collection deadlines and availability of technical assistance. In November 1997, technical assistance visits were conducted, and announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 2 schools were completed. ffl December f997 I technlciia sslstance \"'v1s1ts\" w~re\" conaucted if.egardif!9 ,team_,xi~ts,.,and tectlpig:al re'!J,,ew re. comm,e11dations, anfl pies of the infusion document and ~pe~iual SJ!~ ~ er~ .LOVi~,JQ\n_sro29lsJ n t eE OE,\n\u0026gt;r~,- 11 Ill. A PETITION FOR ELECTION FOR LRSD WILL BE SUPPORTED SHOULD A MILLAGE BE REQUIRED A. Monitor court pleadings to determine if LRSD has petitioned the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing. 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 Ongoing. All Court pleadings are monitored monthly. B. Draft and file appropriate pleadings if LRSD petitions the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 To date, no action has been taken by the LRSD. 12 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION A. Using a collaborative approach, immediately identify those laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date December, 1994 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. B. Conduct a review within ADE of existing legislation and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. C. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of December 31 , 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. Request of the other parties to the Settlement Agreement that they identify laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. D. Submit proposals to the State Board of Education for repeal of those regulations that are confirmed to be impediments to desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of December 31 , 1997 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV. E. of this report. 13 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 A committee within the ADE was formed in May 1995 to review and collect data on existing legislation and regulations identified by the parties as impediments to desegregation. The committee researched the Districts' concerns to determine if any of the rules, regulations, or legislation cited impede desegregation. The legislation cited by the Districts regarding loss funding and worker's compensation were not reviewed because they had already been litigated. In September 1995, the committee reviewed the following statutes, acts, and regulations: Act 113 of 1993\nADE Director's Communication 93-205\nAct 145 of 1989\nADE Director's Memo 91- 67\nADE Program Standards Eligibility Criteria for Special Education\nArkansas Codes 6-18-206, 6-20-307, 6-20-319, and 6-17-1506. In October 1995, the individual reports prepared by committee members in their areas of expertise and the data used to support their conclusions were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. A report was prepared and submitted to the State Board of Education in July 1996. The report concluded that none of the items reviewed impeded desegregation. As of February 3, 1997, no laws or regulations have been determined to impede desegregation efforts. Any new education laws enacted during the Arkansas 81st Legislative Session will be reviewed at the close of the legislative session to ensure that they do not impede desegregation. In April 1997, copies of all laws passed during the 1997 Regular Session of the 81st General Assembly were requested from the office of the ADE Liaison to the Legislature for distribution to the Districts for their input and review of possible impediments to their desegregation efforts. In August 1997, a meeting to review the statutes passed in the prior legislative session was scheduled for September 9, 1997. 14 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. 2. Actual as of December 31, 1997 (Continued) On September 9, 1997, a meeting was held to discuss the review of the statutes passed in the prior legislative session and new ADE regulations. The\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1700","title":"Court filings concerning LRSD Revised Desegregation and Education Plan, attorneys' fees and costs as to state defendants, affidavit of Christopher Heller, and PCSSD's petition for release from federal court supervision and analysis of non-compliance with court order","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)","Heller, Christopher"],"dc_date":["1997-11"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Joshua Intervenors","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Special districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Little Rock School District","Lawyers","Arkansas. Department of Education","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Economic aspects","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School management and organization","School districts","Education and state","School attendance","School integration","School facilities"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings concerning LRSD Revised Desegregation and Education Plan, attorneys' fees and costs as to state defendants, affidavit of Christopher Heller, and PCSSD's petition for release from federal court supervision and analysis of non-compliance with court order"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1700"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["13 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"District Court, response to Joshua intervenors' motion for continuance of hearing; District Court, order; District Court, motion to dismiss appeal against North Little Rock School District (NLRSD); District Court, order; District Court, Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) motion to withhold jurisdiction; District Court, LRSD's amended motion for attorneys' fees and costs as to state defendants; District Court, affidavit of Christopher Heller; District Court, supplemental motion for extension of time to respond to Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's) petition for release from federal court supervision; Chancery Court of Pulaski County, Arkansas, PCSSD analysis of non-compliance with court order; District Court, order; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool; District Court, Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's) amended motion for attorneys' fees and costs as to state defendants  The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT ~N DISTRICT ARKANSAS EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION NOV O 4 1997 JAMES W. McCORMACK, CLERK LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL RECEn/ED NOV '1 1997 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING RESPONSE TO JOSHUA INTERVENORS' MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS For its response, the Little Rock School District (LRSD) states: 1. LRSD appreciates the court's responsiveness to its need - for a timely hearing on its motion for approval of its Revised Desegregation and Education Plan. For the reasons set forth below, however, LRSD believes that a short continuance of the scheduled hearing would benefit all of the parties and the court. 2. The Revised Desegregation and Education Plan calls for the redrawing of attendance zones in accordance with certain principles described in that plan. LRSD has contracted with a software compfiny to provide boundary planning software for the purpose of drawing attendance zones in accordance with those principles. The necessary maps and student location information have been provided to the software company. Training of LRSD personnel is scheduled to begin on November 17, 1997. Within a few weeks after that date LRSD should be in a position to show the - parties and the court maps, racial balance information and other student assignment information regarding a number of possible student assignment options. This information will show the parties and the court the practical application of the student assignment principles described in the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan. 3. LRSD is also in the process of developing policies and procedures which will govern the implementation of the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan. The parties and the court will have the benefit of more of this information if there is a short continuance of the scheduled hearing date. 4. LRSD has agreed to work with Joshua in a cooperative effort to complete all necessary discovery in a timely manner. The - significant number of witnesses and documents, and the fact that LRSD is currently engaged in boundary planning and development of implementation plans, makes it difficult to do the necessary work to insure an orderly and efficient discovery process and presentation to the court on the scheduled hearing date. 5. LRSD supports a continuance of the scheduled hearing only if the hearing can be rescheduled for a time no later than early February, 199Q. If the hearing is scheduled any later than that, LRSD believes that the court will not have sufficient time to consider the evidence and render a decision which LRSD can effectively implement for the 1998-99 school year. 2 WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth above, LRSD supports Joshua's motion for continuance of the scheduled December 1, 1997 hearing, provided the continuance will not delay the hearing beyond early February, 1998. Respectfully submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026 CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Street Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 By:~ Bar No. 81083 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - I certify that a copy of the foregoing Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Continuance of Hearing has been served on the following by depositing copy of same in the United States mail on this 4th day of November, 1997: Mr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sain Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, 1\\R 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES, P.A. 3400 TCBY Tower 425 Capitol Avenue Little Rock, AR 72201 3 --- Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell Law Firm 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown - HAND DELIVERED Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Timothy G. Gauger Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 f:lbomolbd\\yllnd-__ -.............. 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff, vs. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al., Defendants, MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al., Intervenors, KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al., Intervenors. * * * * * * * * * * * * * ORDER No. LR-C-82-866 FILED u.s Ql8TRICT COl.!,'!THIU' EAiTIPI~ 01ST1'10T \"\"\"\"' \"\"' NOV O 4 '997 JAMES W. McCORMACK, CLERK By (\u003e/ef?lr DEP CLERK Before the Court is the a motion filed by the Joshua Intervenors requesting a continuance of the hearing scheduled for Monday, December 1, 1997 regarding the Little Rock School District's (\"LRSD\") motion for approval of the revised desegregation and education plan. This Court is sympathetic to the reasons stated by counsel for the Joshua Intervenors in support of the requested continuance. However, this matter is of great concern to the Little Rock community. Furthermore, the Court expects the hearing on the LRSD's motion to last for a full week. Because the Court has numerous criminal matters scheduled during the upcoming months, there are few alternative dates available to conduct a hearing on the LRSD's motion. For the foregoing reasons, this Court is not inclined to continue the hearing on the LRSD's motion for approval of the revised desegregation and education plan currently set for December 1, 1997. However, this Court will wait for other parties involved in the case to file their responses to the Joshua Intervenors' motion before ruling definitively upon the request for a continuance. ,;14-._ IT IS SO ORDERED THIS~ day of November 1997. a$., ; ~ )1~ui- UNITEDSTATES DISTRlCfJGE T+l8 ~UMENT EHTEREO ON DOCKET 8tET ltl COMP~E ~TH RULE Si AN~~RCf OM //- i/- CJ 1 SY~~~~~;;.;;;- 2 JOHN W. WALKER RALPH WASHINGTON MARK BURNETTE AUSTIN PORTER, JR. November 4, 1997 Ms. Dana C. McWay U.S. Court of Appeals 1114 Market Street St. Louis, Mo 63101 Re: 97-2743 EALR JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. ATIORNEY AT LAw 1723 BROADWAY LITILE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72206 TELEPHONE (501) 374-3758 FAX (501) 374-4187 Joshua, et al v. LRSD, et al Dear Ms. McWay: RECEIVED NOV 5 1997 OFFtC0F DESEGREGATION MONITORING Enclosed please find Joshua's motion as it pertains to the NLRSD. The Joshua Intervenors previously set forth in their reply brief at pages 6 to 19 the issues that remain to be decided by the court given the partial settlement. Those pages are attached hereto. Thank you for your attention to this matter. JWW:cac cc: Stephen Jones Enclosures 'RECEIVED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT NOV 5 1997 MRS. LORENE JOSHUA v. NO. 97-2743EALR LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. MOTION TO DISMISS OFFICE OF DESE~REGATION MONITORING APPELLANT APPELLEE APPELLEE APPEAL AGAINST NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Corne now the Appellees, Joshua Intervenors, and move the Court to dismiss their appeal with respect to the North Little Rock School District Defendants: 1. The Joshua Intervenors and the North Little Rock School - District Defendants have settled their underlying fee dispute and request that this matter be dismissed as to the North Little Rock School Defendants with each party to bear its own costs and fees. WHEREFORE, the Joshua Intervenors pray the Court to dismiss their appeal against the North Little Rock School District with each party to bear its own costs and fees. Respectfully submitted, John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 01) 374-3758 ~IVVL, V ~4 Walker, No. 64046 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ~ I, John w. Walker, do hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing pleading has been served upon Mr. Stephen w. Jones, Jack, Lyon \u0026 Jones, P.A., 3400 TCBY Tower, 425 West Capitol Avenue, Little Rock, AR 72201 and Mr. Chris Heller, Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark, P.A., 2000 First Commercial Bank Building, 400 E. Capitol, Little Rock, AR 72201, by placing a copy of the same in the United States Mail with sufficient postage prepaid on this 4th day of November, 1997.Qh  -~~~ J w. Walker I IN THE UNITED STA TES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, * Plaintiff, * vs. * No. LR-C-82-866 * PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL * DISTRICT NO. 1, et al., * Defendants, * * MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al., * Intervenors, * * KA THERINE KNIGHT, et al., * In tervenors. * ORDER FILED U.S. DISTi\u003cICT COURT EASTERN DISTR:cr ,\\FW.ANSAS NOV O 0 1997 JAMES W. McCORMACK, CLERK By: ~ ' j \\1 :)MQG,. \\ OEP CLERK . Before the Court are two very important matters: the Little Rock School District's (\"LRSD\") motion requesting that this Court approve its revised desegregation and education plan and the Pulaski County Special School District's (\"PCSSD\") motion requesting that this Court release it from federal court supervision. A. Previously, this Court scheduled a hearing for Monday, December 1, 1997 to address the LRSD's motion requesting that this Court approve its revised desegregation and education plan. 1 Now, before the Court is a motion requesting that this Court continue the hearing 1 Docket No. 3062. 071 currently scheduled for the week of December 1, 1997.2 By separate Order, this Court has indicated its reluctance to reschedule this hearing. 3 However, the LRSD has indicated that it \"believes that a short continuance of the scheduled hearing date would benefit all of the parties and the court. \"4 Counsel for the Joshua Intervenors also has indicated that due to his trial schedule and the amount of discovery and preparation necessary for this hearing, the Joshua Intervenors would benefit from a continuance of the scheduled hearing date.5 Therefore, after careful consideration, this Court hereby grants the motion requesting a continuance. The hearing to address the LRSD's revised desegregation and education plan will now commence at 9:00 a.m. on Monday, February 2, 1998. The parties still are expected to conduct discovery prior to and in preparation for this hearing. The discovery deadline is now Tuesday, January 20, 1998, approximately two weeks prior to the date of the hearing. To avoid potential discovery and evidentiary disputes, all parties are directed to exchange exhibits with one another and to provide an exhibit list, as well as copies of their exhibits, to both the Court and the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (\"ODM\") on or before the January 20 discovery deadline. This Court will not admit any exhibit as evidence at the February hearing which was not produced on or before the discovery 2 Docket No. 3067. 3 Docket No. 3069. 4 Docket No. 3070. 5 Docket No. 3067. 2 deadline in accordance with this Order if any party objects to the exhibit's being admitted on the basis of timeliness. Due to time constraints and in an effort to be fair to all parties involved, the Court still intends to calculate the total number of hours which will be devoted to this matter and then limit accordingly the amount of time each party will have to present testimony and other evidence and to cross examine witnesses at the hearing. B. In regard to the PCS SD' s motion requesting that this Court release it from federal court supervision, this Court is aware that by separate Order the Court granted the Joshua Intervenors an extension to and including November 24, 1997 in which to file their response to the PCSSD's motion.6 Although this Court has not received or reviewed the Joshua - Intervenors' response to the PCSSD's motion, this Court anticipates that a hearing will be necessary on the PCSSD's motion. Therefore, a hearing to address the PCSSD's motion requesting release from federal court supervision will commence at 9:00 a.m. on Monday, March 23, 1998. The discovery deadline is Monday, March 9, 1998, two weeks prior to the date of the hearing. Again, to avoid potential discovery and evidentiary disputes, all parties are directed to exchange exhibits with one another and to provide an exhibit list, as well as copies of their exhibits, to both the Court and the ODM on or before the March 9 discovery deadline. This Court will not admit any exhibit as evidence at the March hearing which was not produced on 6 See Docket No. 3063. 3 - or before the discovery deadline in accordance with this Order if any party objects to the exhibit's being admitted on the basis of timeliness. Again, due to time constraints and in an effort to be fair to all parties involved, the Court intends to calculate the total number of hours which will be devoted to this matter and then limit accordingly the amount of time each party will have to present testimony and other evidence and to cross examine witnesses at the hearing. In conclusion, this Court grants the motion requesting a continuance of the scheduled hearing on the LRSD's revised desegregation and education plan.7 The Court will conduct a hearing on the LRSD's revised plan beginning at 9:00 a.m. on Monday, February 2, 1998.8 The discovery deadline is Tuesday, January 20, 1998. The Court also will conduct a hearing on the PCSSD's motion requesting release from - federal court supervision beginning at 9:00 a.m. on Monday, March 23, 1998.9 The discovery deadline is Monday, March 9, 1998. ~ IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 0 day of November 1997. 7 Docket No. 3067. u~ ED$ sTAE\u0026SDIS~TR!CJ~UDGE \"HiS DXlfr-~;;\"J.JT Er-JTE:RED CN DOCKET SHEET IN ;XJMPUANC WITH RULE 53 AI\\J~9(a) FACP ~N // .~ BY_~-------- 8 See Docket No. 3049 for a copy of the LRSD's motion regarding the revised plan. 9 See Docket No. 3057 for a copy of the PCSSD's motion regarding release from federal court supervision. 4 NOV 1 3 1997 IN THE CHANCERY COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS LAKE VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25 OF PHILLIPS COUNTY, ARKANSAS, ET AL. VS. NO. 92-5318 (and consolidated MIKE HUCKABEE, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS, ET AL. PCSSD MOTION TO WITHHOLD JURISDICTION INTRODUCTION OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING PLAINTIFFS\" .\u003c;;ases.}o c:. .._J r - ~ c,,, 0 -n  ri~Em5EJ'ITS_:: 12 C?-:: c::\u003e 'J S~-~- :.~ n . .. ,;--, ,: :.. - .J4 1i~}  - c...:\u003e The PCSSD intervened in this action primarily as reg\u0026rds N ( /) certain state-aid claims that are either pending before or which have been adjudicated by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas . These claims arise from the Settlement Agreement of March, 1989 entered into among the three Pulaski County School Districts, the State of Arkansas, the - Joshua Intervenors and the teacher organizations represented by the Knight Intervenors. Each of the claims, which are more fully described below, flow from contentions by the school districts that legislat i ve changes in state funding, changes which occurred after t his Court's Order of November, 1994, violated the Districts' 1989 Settlement Agreement with the State. The claims that are either adjudicated or pending include claims regarding workers' compensation, loss funding regarding majority-to-minority (M-to-M) transfer students, teacher retirement, health insurance, special education, general loss funding, and, as respects the PCSSD, a decline in overall funding when Act 34 and Act 917 outcomes are compared. 1 THE CLAIMS AND THEIR PROCEDURAL POSTURE On January 13, 1995, the District Court entered its order as regards workers' compensation and loss funding for majority-tominority transfer students. A copy of the decision is attached to the PCSSD motion as Exhibit \"A\". Beginning at page 6 of the January 13, 1995 order, the District Court concluded that: [T]he Court does find that the State must assist the three Pulaski County school districts to the same degree that it is assisting the other districts in the state. Thus, the State must fund the same proportion of the cost of each of the three Pulaski County school districts' workers' compensation insurance as it pays for all the other school districts in the state beginning with the 1994-95 school year. By requiring the State to assist the Pulaski County school districts to the same degree that it is assisting others, the Districts will not be \"singled out\" for less favorable treatment than the other districts. The January 13, 1995 District Court order adjudicated the issue of loss funding for M-to-M students in favor of the Pulaski County districts. Beginning at page 9 of that order, the District Court found that: It is undisputed that loss funding is a State educational funding program and one that is \"ordinarily the responsibility of the State of Arkansas.\" The Court further finds that the State is deliberately discriminating against the Districts with respect to the provision of loss funding for a decline in enrollment related to the loss of M-to-M students. Whether a district loses a student through ordinary transfer or an M-to-M transfer, the effect on that district's enrollment is the same. No matter how the loss occurs, the disruption to a school district form a net declining enrollment is the same. However, the ADE has decided not to credit the Districts for the loss of students due to M-to-M students. Thus, the ADE has determined to discriminate against the three Pulaski County districts with respect to M-to-M students. 2 The District Court went on to order the State to restore the lost State aid contended for by the Districts in accordance with the calculations set forth by the Districts. The State appealed both issues and the findings of the District Court were affirmed on appeal. 1 On February 18, 1997, the District Court entered its order granting the Districts' motions in respect of teacher retirement and health insurance. By this point, 111 other Arkansas school districts had sought to intervene and _were permitted to file amicus curiae responses in support of the State's position. The Fe~ruary 18, 1997 order is attached to the PCSSD motion as Exhibit 11 B11  The District Court reasoned that: The Court thus finds that there is no genuine factual dispute that instead of directly funding each district based upon the number of employees, the State has included funds for teacher retirement in the new funding scheme with distributes funds on a per ADM basis equalized by the wealth of the district. Just as the workers' compensation \"seed money\" formula worked to the detriment of the employee-heavy Pulaski County school districts, so too does the distribution of teacher retirement contributions through the new funding formula give the districts less money to fund teacher retirement . . While the three Pulaski County school districts may fare better under the new funding scheme from a state aid perspective, there is no question that the amount of their teacher retirement funding, previously directly funded by the State based upon the eligible salaries paid to their employees, will be reduced and result in unequal state funding. The District Court concluded its discussion by noting: As noted before, the desegregation Settlement Agreement provides that \"[f]air and rational adjustments to the 1The January 13, 1995 order also dealt with the issue of the Arkansas Public School Computer Network. That issue has been resolved and need not concern this Court. 3 funding formula which have general applicability but which reduce the proportion of State aid to any of the Districts shall not be considered to have an adverse impact on the desegregation of the Districts.\" See Settlement Agreement,  II, 1 L. Even if the Court were to find that the new funding scheme for teacher retirement is an \"adjustment\" to the funding formula which has \"general applicability,\" however, the Court cannot find that it is a \"fair and rational adjustment.\" Because of the added obligations of the three Pulaski County school districts, a funding scheme that does not consider the number of eligible employees is not \"fair and rational.\" February 13, 1997 Order, pp. 11-12. This issue is presently on appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. On April 22, 1997, the District Court entered its order as respects the issue of health insurance. The April 22, 1997 order is attached to the PCSSD motion as Exhibit \"C\". The District Court likewise granted the motions of the Districts reasoning, inter alia that: Because of the settling districts' added obligations, this Court found that the new funding scheme, which does not consider the number of eligible employees, is not \"fair and rational.\" While the State may contend that the settling districts will receive more formula money under the new funding scheme, the Court finds that because the new funding scheme does not consider the number of eligible employees but instead is based upon ADM, equalized by the wealth of the district, requiring the settling districts to pay health insurance matching from equalization or local funds is not a \"fair and rational\" adjustment to the funding formula. April 22, 1997 Order, p. 5. The health insurance issue is likewise on appeal to the Eighth Circuit. 4 .,,. \"' ;~. -: ? ~ ~ ~ .. ~- While the District Court, in the same order, declined to grant the Districts' motion as respects special education and general loss funding, those issues remain before the District Court for hearing and resolution. Finally, the PCSSD filed its separate motion with the District Court on September 2, 1997 contending that the change from Act 34 to Act 917, the Act before this Court, cost it several million dollars and that the change violates the 1989 Settlement Agreement. This issue remains upon the docket of the Pistrict Court for hearing and resolution. A copy of the PCSSD's September 2, 1997 motion and brief are attached as Exhibit \"D\". The essential grounds for the separate PCSSD motion pending in federal court are essentially set forth in the PCSSD's response to Lake View plaintiffs' motion for attorneys' fees dated August 29, 1997. CONCLUSION The principal purpose of this motion is to further educate this Court concerning issues pending in federal court and over which the federal courts have taken and continue to exercise jurisdiction pursuant to the 1989 Settlement Agreement. This Court will no doubt have to grapple with many, if not all, of the topics discussed above. Indeed, this Court may find useful some of the explanations, rationales and conclusions made by the District Court. However, it is respectfully submitted, this Court should proceed in a manner which recognizes the 5 adjudication or pendency of these issues in federal court and should craft its ultimate orders accordingly. Respectfully submitted: WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 200 West Capitol Avenue Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3699 (501) 371-0808 CERTIFICATE OF On November Ju , 1997, a copy of the foregoing was served by U.S. mail on the following persons. E. Dion Wilson Wilson Law Firm, P.A. 801 Perry Street Helena, Arkansas 72342 Roy C. Lewellen Lewellen \u0026 Associates P. 0. Box 287 Marianna, AR 72360 Mr. Tim Humphries Assistant Attorney General 323 Center, Suite 200 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. James M. Llewellyn Thompson \u0026 Llewellyn P. 0. Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902 Mr. William Brazil Brazil, Clawson, et al. 913 Oak Street Conway, Arkansas 72032 Mr. Donn Mixon Mixon \u0026 McCauley Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 400 W. Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Stephen Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026 Jones 425 W. Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. David Matthews Matthews, Campell \u0026 Rhoads 119 S. Second Street Rogers, AR 72756 Mr. Allen Roberts Allen P. Roberts, P.A. P. 0. Box 280 Camden, Arkansas Mr. Edwin Alford 510 N. Second P. 0. Box 1588 Nashville, Arkansas Mr. David Wilson Ms. Pam Grondin 6 71701 71852 P. 0. Box 1442 Jonesboro, AR 72403 Mr. Malcolm Bobo Department of Finance \u0026 Adm. P. 0. Box 1272 Little Rock, AR 72203 Mr. Don Trimble 1124 MLKing Drive Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Eugene G. Sayre Jack, Lyon \u0026 Jones . 425 W. Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Fayetteville School Dist. P. 0. Box 849 Fayetteville, AR 72702 Mr. Oscar Stilley Central Mall Plaza, #516 Fort Smith, AR 72903 Mr. John W. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 7 (see ADE Funding 1997 for complete filing with Exhibits) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KnTHERINE KUIGHT, ET AL RECEIVEO NOV 1 3 1997 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING  LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT'S PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS . INTERVENORS INTERVENOP.S AMENDED MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS AS TO STATE DEFENDANTS For its motion, the Little Rock School District (LRSD) states: 1. The purpose of this amended fee petition is to address the issues remanded to the district court in the opinion of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals filed on October 14, 1997. 2. Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark charges LRSD discounted rates for fees and costs. During the period of time the issues covered by this fee petition were in litigation, Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark charged LRSD $105.00 per hour for partners and $85.00 per hour for associates. Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark also charges LRSD reduced amounts for some costs, such as couriers, and does not charge for . other costs, such as meals. During the period of time covered by this litigation, the normal hourly billing rate for Christopher Heller was $160. 00 and the normal hourly billing rate for Clay Fendley was $100.00. 3. Most of LRSD counsels' time concerning the APSCN issue was excluded from the previous fee petition. Two further adjustments are necessary to meet the terms of the Eighth Circuit order. First, the time entry for June 19, 1995 includes, among other entries, some time for drafting an APSCN argument. That time should be reduced by one-half, or a total of five hours, to remove the time spent on the APSCN argument. Second, the time spent on the four hearing days in preparation for and participating in the hearings on the three issues in this case should be 4educed byonethird in order to remove the time devoted to the APSCN issue. Our contemporaneous time records show a total of 3 6. 5 hours spent preparing for and participating in hearings on September 14, 15, 16 and 21, 1994. That time should be reduced by 12.25 hours to reflect the time devoted to the APSCN issue. 4. LRSD is a prevailing party and is therefore entitled to an award of attorneys' fees and costs. The amount of attorneys' fees for Christopher Heller should be reduced by a total of 17.25 hours for the reasons set forth above. LRSD is entitled to $39,760.00 in attorneys' fees (Christopher Heller - 244.75 hours x $160.00 = $39,160.00; Clay Fendley - 6 hours x $100.00 = $600.00) and $563.32 in costs. 5. The, fees and costs are supported by the attached Affidavit. WHEREFORE, in accordance with this court's previous order and the decision of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals filed October 2 14, 1997, LRSD prays for an order awarding it $39,760.00 in attorneys' fees and $563.32 in costs. Respectfully submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026 CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol street Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Little Rock School district's Amended Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs As To State Defendants has been served on the following by depositing copy of same in the United States mail on this 13th day of November, 1997. Mr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES, P.A. 3400 TCBY Tower 425 Capitol Avenue Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell Law Firm 401 West Capitol, suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown - HAND DELIVERED Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Timothy G. Gauger Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL AEcen.teo NOV 1 3 1997 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING AFFIDAVIT PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS I, Christopher Heller, after being duly sworn, state under oath: 1. The billing statements attached to our original fee petition filed August 30, 1996 reflect the hours worked on this - matter as recorded in contemporaneous time records. All of the time shown on these billing statements has been billed to LRSD and those bills have been paid. 2. During the period of time covered by this fee petition, Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark contracted with LRSD to provide legal services at discounted fees. The discounted rates charged to LRSD were $105. 00 per hour for partners and $85. 00 per hour for associates. 3. I have been engaged in the private practice of law at Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark for sixteen (16) years. My normal hourly billing rate for the period of time covered by this fee petition is $160. 00. That rate is in line with rates typically charged by lawyers of similar experience and ability in Pulaski County, Arkansas. 4. Clay Fendley is an associate with Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark with five (5) years of experience. His normal hourly billing rate during the period of time covered by this fee petition is $100.00. This rate is in line with billing rates for lawyers of similar experience and ability in Pulaski County, Arkansas. 5. My time in this case was devoted primarily to the loss funding and workers' compensation issues. During the course of preparing the previous fee petition, I reviewed the billing rec.ords in an effort to exclude time which was devoted to matters on which LRSD did not prevail, including the APSCN issue and our petition for reconsideration to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. In consideration of the Eighth Circuit order filed October 14, 1997, and upon. further review of the time records attached to the original petition, I have determined that the time entry for June 19, 1995 should be reduced by five hours to remove the time listed as \"drafted APSGC (sic) argument.\" 6. The time entries for the hearing dates, September 14, 15, 16 and 21, 1994, a total of 36.5 hours, should be reduced by onethird, or 12.25 hours, to remove the time spent on APSCN issues. The number of .h ours for which LRSD should be awarded fees should therefore be reduced from 262 in the original petition to 244.75 for my time. The amount of attorneys' fees should be reduced by a total of $2760.00, from $42,520.00 in the original petition to $39,760.00. 2 7. As can be seen from the billing statements attached to the original fee petition, the time expended on this matter was originally recorded and billed as part of the general Little Rock School District desegregation case file (LI230-90). Following the district court decision, a separate file was established (LI230- 159). In reviewing the general file, I was very conservative in my effort to segregate the time which was devoted to the issues in this discreet matter. Many time entries which were more probably than not related to this matter are not included in the fee request. Further affiant sayeth not. 3 ATTESTATION I, Christopher Heller, the undersigned herein, state that the foregoing Affidavit is true and correct to the best of my information, knowledge \u0026 belief. Dated this 13th day of Novem "},{"id":"fda_houck_390148","title":"Legislating Virtue: How Segregationists Disguised Racial Discrimination as Moral Reform Following Brown v. Board of Education","collection_id":"fda_houck","collection_title":"Davis Houck Papers","dcterms_contributor":["Walker, Anders"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Mississippi, 32.75041, -89.75036"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1997-11"],"dcterms_description":["Summary: Article on segregation and racial discrimination following Brown v. Board of Education."],"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Durham, N.C. : Duke Law Journal"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["http://purl.fcla.edu/fsu/MSS_2015-007"],"dcterms_subject":["African Americans--Civil rights--History--20th century","African Americans--Crimes against","Civil rights","Journalism--Political aspects--United States","Mississippi--Race relations","Racism in the press","Rhetoric--Political aspects--United States--History--20th century","Trials (Murder)--United States"],"dcterms_title":["Legislating Virtue: How Segregationists Disguised Racial Discrimination as Moral Reform Following Brown v. Board of Education"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Florida State University Libraries. Special Collections"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_MSS_2015-007_S03_SS03_I010"],"dcterms_temporal":["1900/1999"],"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["articles"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1155","title":"Little Rock School District, school profiles","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1997-10-29"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Badgett Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Hardin Bale Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Baseline Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Booker T. Washington Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Brady Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Carver Magnet Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Central High School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Chicot Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Cloverdale Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School employees","School improvement programs","Student assistance programs","Students","School integration"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District, school profiles"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1155"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nBadgett Elementary, Bale Elementary, Baseline Elementary, Booker Elementary, Brady Elementary, Carver Elementary, Central High, Chicot Elementary, Cloverdale Elementary\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nPOSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST REMDL/COMP MATH GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BADGETT B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 POSITIONS 1 10 0 9 0 0 5.00 50.00 00 45.00 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 11 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 20 00 20 % BLACK 100.00 54.55 100.00 00 100.00 00 00 100.00 100.00 55.00 55.00 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BADGETT B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 4 9 0 2 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 26.67 60.00 00 13 .33 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 3 2 1 1 1 5 2 15 00 15 % BLACK 33.33 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 86.67 86.67 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BADGETT B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 5 19 0 11 14.29 54.29 .oo 31.43 0 .oo 0 .oo 35 35 % BLACK 68.57 68.57 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 15 20 4 1 0 0 40 87.5% P4 13 21 0 2 0 0 36 94.4% SP 6 2 0 0 0 0 8 100.0% 01 18 15 0 1 0 0 34 97 .1% 02 17 12 0 2 0 0 31 93.5% 03 12 9 0 1 0 0 22 95.5% 04 9 7 3 3 0 0 22 72. 7% 05 10 11 0 1 0 0 22 95.5% 06 13 10 0 0 0 0 23 100.0% Total 113 107 7 11 0 0 238 92.4% 47.5% 45.0% 2.9% 4.6% .0% .0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K PHILLIPS T. 1 7 9 3 1 20 80.0% K WILLIS C. 1 8 11 1 20 95.0% P4 GADDY G. 1 7 10 17 100.0% P4 TRAYLOR K. 1 6 11 2 19 89.5% 01 BROOKS D. 1 8 6 1 15 93.3% 01 MCGOWAN D. 1 10 8 18 100.0% 02 MCLENNAN A. 1 9 6 2 17 88.2% 02 SINGER P. 1 8 6 14 100.0% 03 CAMPBELL E. 1 12 9 1 22 95.5% 04 HESSELBEIN A. 1 8 7 3 3 21 71.4% 04 PRUITT G. 1 1 1 2 100.0% 05 ALBERT R. 1 10 11 1 22 95.5% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Teacher 05 06 06 PRUITT G. PRUITT G. TRIMBLE 8. BM ******TEACHER****** BF WM 1 WF 1 1 OM OF SP 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** BM 3 2 13 BF 1 10 WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 3 100.0% 3 100.0% 23 100.0% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Speech or Language Impaired 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 100.0% TOTALS 12 0 0 0 0 0 12 100.0% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 6 3 1 2 0 0 12 75.0% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 1 1 100.0% 01 1 1 100.0% 02 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PEER HELPERS 2 8 2 12 83.3% 1 1 100.0% AMBASSADORS 2 8 2 1 13 76.9% 1 1 100.0% JUST SAY NO CLUB 3 4 1 3 11 63.6% 1 1 100.0% CONFLICT MANAGER 4 3 2 1 10 70.0% 1 1 100.0% LIBRARY MONITORS 2 5 1 8 87.5% 1 1 .0% STUDENT COUNCIL 4 3 2 9 77. 8% 1 1 100.0% FIRE MARSHALLS 2 1 2 1 6 50.0% 1 1 100.0% TOTAL 19 32 8 10 69 73.9% 6 1 7 85.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black CITZ OF WEEK K .0% CITZ OF WEEK 1 .0% CITZ OF WEEK 2 .0% CITZ OF WEEK 3 .0% CITZ OF WEEK 4 .0% CITZ OF WEEK 5 .0% CITZ OF WEEK 6 .0% HONOR ROLL K .0% HONOR ROLL 1 .0% - HONOR ROLL 2 .0% HONOR ROLL 3 .0% HONOR ROLL 4 .0% HONOR ROLL 5 .0% HONOR ROLL 6 .0% HONOR ROLL SC .0% PERFT ATTEND K .0% PERFT ATTEND 1 .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD PERFT ATTEND PERFT ATTEND PERFT ATTEND PERFT ATTEND PERFT ATTEND PERFT ATTEND TOTAL GRADE BM BF WM WF 2 3 4 5 6 SC 10/29/97 OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% PAGE 2 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black BIRACIAL COMMITT 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 4 50.0% P.T.A. BOARD MBR 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 1 1 5 60.0% HANDBOOK 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PARENT WORKSHOPS 1 1 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0% SCHOOL IMPROV co 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 1 2 6 50.0% RECRUITMENT 1 2 3 6 50.0% 2 3 1 6 33.3% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF TOTAL 1 16 18 OM OF Total % Black 35 48.6% BM 3 10/29/97 PAGE 3 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 9 5 7 24 50.0% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PREJUDICE REDUC. TESA PET HUMAN RELATIONS COOP. LEARNING. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 14 7 9 16 6 45 7 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 CULTURAL RELAT MULTICUL CURR. TOTAL 2 3 5 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP 15 CLASSROOM MGMT. 8 CONFLICT MGMT. 5 TOTAL 28 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 AT RISK TOTAL 6 6 PAGE 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT QUIZ:SSPLST STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BALE POSITION BL A C K W H I T E 0 T H E R TOTAL % M F M F M F BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 0 5 1 11 0 0 17 29.41 COUNSELOR 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 MEDIA SPECIALIST 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 REMDL/COMP READING 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 REMDL/COMP MATH 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 GIFTED/TALENTED 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 RESOURCE/TEACHER 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 00 SPEECH THERAPIST 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 00 MUSIC 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 PE 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 00 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 0 6 2 22 0 0 30 20.00 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 00 20.00 6.67 73.33 00 00 30 20.00 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BALE B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 2 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 7 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 4 11 0 6 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 19.05 52.38 00 28.57 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 4 3 1 1 1 9 2 21 00 21 % BLACK 50.00 100.00 00 00 00 88.89 100.00 71.43 71.43 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BALE B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 4 17 2 28 7.84 33.33 3.92 54.90 0 .00 0 .oo 51 51 % BLACK 41.18 41.18 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 19 20 5 4 4 0 52 75.0% P4 7 10 6 3 8 2 36 47.2% SP 3 2 1 0 0 0 6 83.3% 01 14 25 6 0 2 2 49 79.6% 02 19 19 4 4 1 1 48 79.2% 03 15 18 3 3 1 1 41 80.5% 04 17 16 4 4 0 0 41 80.5% 05 19 14 8 8 1 2 52 63.5% 06 19 14 1 2 2 0 38 86.8% Total 132 138 38 28 19 8 363 74.4% 36.4% 38.0% 10.5% 7.7% 5.2% 2.2% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K GENTRY-HEARD R. 1 1 1 100.0% K HUTTO M. 1 6 6 2 1 2 17 70.6% K LITTELL T. 1 7 7 3 17 82.4% K SEILER D. 1 1 1 100. 0% K SHUTE K. 1 6 6 3 2 17 70.6% P4 GEURIN R. 1 4 5 3 2 3 1 18 50.0% P4 JOHNSON c. 1 3 5 3 1 5 1 18 44 .4% 01 BALENKO M. 1 7 13 3 1 1 25 80.0% 01 BROWN C. 1 7 12 3 1 1 24 79.2% 02 CONLEY F. 1 10 9 1 2 1 1 24 79.2% 02 GENTRY-HEARD R. 1 1 2 1 4 75.0% 02 SEILER D. 1 1 1 .0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 02 TALLEY H. 1 9 10 3 1 23 82.6% 03 CUNNINGHAM L. 1 8 8 2 2 1 21 76.2% 03 FUNK P. 1 7 10 1 1 1 20 85.0% 03 GENTRY-HEARD R. 1 1 1 100.0% 04 FRANCIS L. 1 10 7 1 2 20 85.0% 04 UNDERWOOD-MOR L. 1 7 9 3 1 20 80.0% 04 SEILER D. 1 1 1 .0% 05 DOCKERY M. 1 10 6 4 4 1 25 64.0% 05 SEILER D. 1 1 1 .0% 05 TARKINGTON R. 1 9 7 4 3 2 25 64.0% 06 NELSON J. 1 10 8 2 20 90.0% 06 ROSBY K. 1 8 6 1 2 17 82.4% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 06 SEILER D. 1 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Autism 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 .0% Hearing Impaired 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 50.0% Mentally Retarded 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Multihandicapped 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 100.0% Orthopedically Handicapped 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 .0% Other Health Impaired 1 0 2 0 0 0 3 33.3% Specific Learning Disability 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 100.0% Speech or Language Impaired 8 4 5 4 0 0 21 57.1% Visually Handicapped 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 .0% TOTALS 14 7 10 6 0 0 37 56.8% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 14 12 3 5 1 1 36 72.2% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 1 1 100.0% 01 1 1 100.0% 02 1 1 100.0% 03 1 1 100.0% 05 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Just Say No 20 16 4 6 1 3 50 72. 0% 1 1 2 50.0% Peer Tutors 3 8 1 2 1 1 16 68.8% 1 1 100.0% Conflict Manager 11 4 1 2 18 83.3% 1 1 100.0% Sign-a-Thon 1 1 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 - H 1 2 1 2 6 50.0% 1 1 100.0% HOST \u0026amp; HOSTESSES 11 8 1 4 24 79.2% 1 1 100.0% RECORDER .0% 1 1 .0% TOTAL 47 39 8 20 2 4 120 71. 7% 6 3 9 66.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD PERF ATT pERF ATT PERF ATT PERF ATT PERF ATT PERF ATT PERF ATT HIGHEST ACA HIGHEST ACA HIGHEST ACA Straight A's Straight A's Straight A's Straight A's Straight A's Straight A's HIGHEST ACA GRADE BM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BF WM WF 10/29/97 OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% PAGE 1 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD HIGHEST ACA HIGHEST ACA BEST CITIZEN BEST CITIZEN A/B AVERAGE A/B AVERAGE A/B AVERAGE A/B AVERAGE A/B AVERAGE A/B AVERAGE BEST CITIZEN BEST CITIZEN BEST CITIZEN BEST CITIZEN SUNSHINE SUNSHINE CITIZENSHI,P GRADE BM BF WM WF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10/29/97 OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% PAGE 2 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD CITIZENSHIP CITIZENSHIP CITIZENSHIP CITIZENSHIP CITIZENSHIP SUNSHINE SUNSHINE SUNSHINE SUNSHINE MOST IMPR LIFE PRIN AW TOTAL GRADE BM BF WM WF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10/29/97 OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% PAGE 3 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BIRACIAL COMMITT P.T.A. BOARD MBR G/T BM BF WM WF 1 2 1 1 1 2 OM OF Total 2 3 3 % Black 50.0% 66. 7% .0% BM 1 1 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF 1 4 1 2 2 OM 1 OF Total 4 8 % Black 50.0% 62.5% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % SCHOOL IMPROV CO RECRUITMENT COMM DISCIPLINE HEAR! 2 1 1 1 3 2 1 5 3 3 Black 40.0% 33.3% 33.3% BM 1 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 2 2 WM WF 1 1 1 OM 2 OF Total % 3 5 Black 66.7% 60.0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE TITLE I PLANNING EMERGENCY CRISIS GREAT EXPECTATIO BM BF WM WF 2 2 2 6 3 5 OM OF Total % Black 8 25.0% 5 40.0% 7 28.6% 10/29/97 PAGE 3 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BCC BLACK HISTORY PUPIL SERVICE TE BM BF 1 3 2 WM WF 2 1 5 OM OF Total 3 4 7 % Black 33.3% 75.0% 28.6% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 4 OF Total % Black .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 5 SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PARTNERS IN EDUC 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 100.0% MEMBERSHIP 1 1 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0% ROOM MOTHERS 1 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 6 SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PTA COUNCIL 1 1 100.0% 1 1 1 1 4 50.0% HOSPITALITY 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 100. 0% TOTAL 25 2 35 62 40.3% 4 15 3 8 30 63.3% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 5 5 TESA 9 RACE RELATIONS 5 5 HUMAN RELATIONS 38 5 1 CULTURAL RELAT. 2 AT RISK 16 PRESCHOOL INSERV 22 OPEN COURT 24 GREAT EXPECTATIO 28 18 2 14 TOTAL 103 64 17 15 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PET 12 CYCLE 1 5 CYCLE 2 2 CYCLE 3 1 COOP. LEARNING 1 1 ACADEMIC SUPPORT 4 NEW BRIDGE 28 TRAINER OF TRAIN 2 CURR COMPACTING 1 TRI-D GIT 1 ADADE COMP/ENRI 1 NATL FACU INSTIT 3 CRITICAL/CREATI 1 Reading/Spelling 24 TOTAL 62 24 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP 5 CLASSROOM MGMT. 20 1 POS CLASS MGMT 14 VIOLENCE PREVEN 1 MANAGER CONFLICT 1 STRESS MANAGEMEN 28 CLASSROOM MODIF 23 PS GRADES 1-6 12 PS SUPPORT STAFF 11 COOP TEAM LEARN 1 SP ED DISCIPLINE 1 PLAYGRD DISC TOTAL 117 1 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 10 2 3 15 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-..97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 LEARN DISABIL 26 2 GANGS 26 PORTFOLIO ASSESS 26 LEARNING STYLES 26 SELF ESTEEM/ELE 16 MOTIVATION 28 GREAT EXPECTATIO 28 33 3 READING/METRA 15 BEGIN YEAR STAFF 24 24 4 10 FRIST AID 4 1 PS K-12 INSTR A 7 2 ABACUS 27 2 LR-CDA TRAINING 2 G/E SP.EDU 22 INSTRU AIDES 4YR 2 2 INCLUSION (K) 3 SHURLEY 8 TEST DATA 15 New Teacher Trai 2 Marva Collins Se 5 TOTAL 242 116 19 18 BASELINE POSITION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 11/03/97 BASELINE B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL % BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 0 9 1 8 0 0 18 50.00 COUNSELOR 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 MEDIA SPECIALIST 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 REMDL/COMP MATH 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 GIFTED/TALENTED 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 RESOURCE/TEACHER 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 100.00 SPEECH THERAPIST 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 MUSIC 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 PE 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 00 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 0 15 2 12 0 0 29 51. 72 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 00 51.72 6.90 41.38 00 00 29 51. 72  POSITION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 11/03/97 BASELINE B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL % BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER 0 1 0 2 0 1 4 25.00 CUSTODIANS 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 100. 00 MEDIA CLERK 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 SECRETARY 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 NURSE 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES 1 9 0 0 0 0 10 100.00 SUPERVISION AIDES 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 100.00 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 3 16 0 3 0 1 23 82.61 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 13.04 69.57 00 13 .04 00 4.35 23 82.61  POSITION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 11/03/97 BASELINE B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL % BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL PERCENT 3 31 2 15 5.77 59.62 3.85 28.85 0 .oo 1 1. 92 52 52 65.38 65.38   01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 11/03/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 17 28 0 5 3 1 54 83.3% P4 11 16 4 2 1 1 35 77 .1% SP 2 4 1 0 1 0 8 75.0% 01 25 19 3 4 3 1 55 80.0% 02 16 16 1 2 0 1 36 88.9% 03 17 23 0 5 3 1 49 81.6% 04 14 7 3 2 0 0 26 80.8% 05 17 11 4 2 0 2 36 77.8% 06 15 13 0 1 1 0 30 93.3% Total 134 137 16 23 12 7 329 82.4% 40.7% 41. 6% 4.9% 7.0% 3.6% 2.1%  01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 11/03/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K CLEVENGER s. 1 5 7 12 100.0% K JAMES M. 1 5 5 3 1 1 15 66.7% K LOVE B. 1 3 7 1 l 12 83.3% K SELF E. 1 4 8 1 1 14 85.7% P4 HILL D. 1 6 8 2 1 17 82.4% P4 SMITH M. 1 5 7 2 1 1 1 17 70.6% 01 BELIN P. 1 1 2 1 4 75.0% 01 DEATON B. 1 10 7 2 1 20 85.0% 01 GARNER D. 1 7 5 3 1 1 17 70.6% 01 LAMB A. 1 8 7 1 1 1 18 83.3% 02 BELIN P. 1 2 1 3 66.7% 02 SHARP c. 1 8 6 1 2 17 82.4% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 11/03/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 02 THOMAS B. 1 8 9 1 18 94.4% 03 GLASON D. 1 8 12 2 2 1 25 80.0% 03 GRIMM B. 1 9 11 3 1 24 83.3% 04 BELIN P. 1 1 1 100.0% 04 HUFFMAN C. 1 14 7 3 2 26 80.8% 05 HOOVER P. 1 8 6 2 1 1 18 77.8% 05 TATUM V. 1 9 5 2 1 1 18 77.8% 06 BOWMAN R. 1 7 6 1 14 92. 9% 06 PEARSON M. 1 8 7 1 16 93.8%  01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 11/03/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Multihandicapped 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Other Health Impaired 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 100.0% Speech or Language Impaired 5 3 0 2 0 0 10 80.0% TOTALS 12 4 0 2 0 0 18 88.9%  01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 11/03/97 SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 4 11 0 1 0 0 16 93.8%  01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 11/03/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 1 2 3 100.0% 01 1 1 100.0% 03 1 3 4 100.0% 05 2 2 4 100.0% 06 1 1 .0%  01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 11/03/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Safety Patrol 3 2 3 5 4 3 20 25.0% 1 1 .0% Tutors .0% .0% Morning Announce 2 1 3 66. 7% 1 1 100.0% Ambassadors 3 3 1 2 1 10 60.0% 1 1 .0% STOP Club 3 2 3 5 4 3 20 25.0% 1 1 .0% Honors Club .0% .0% Just Say No 13 7 3 1 1 25 80.0% .0% Fire Marshals 3 3 6 100.0% .0% Student Council 5 5 2 1 1 1 15 66. 7% 2 2 .0% Drill Team 1 17 1 19 94. 7% 1 1 100.0% Student Represen 17 2 1 20 85.0% 2 2 100.0% Dance Team Rep 7 16 3 2 1 29 79.3% 1 1 100.0% Choir .0% 2 1 3 66.7% TOTAL 40 72 15 19 10 11 167 67 .1% 7 1 5 13 53.8%  01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 11/03/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black All A's K 4 2 6 100.0% A \u0026amp; B Honors K 5 7 12 100.0% All A's ls 2 10 1 13 92.3% A \u0026amp; B Honors ls 8 7 2 1 18 83.3% All A's 2n 2 1 3 66.7% A \u0026amp; B Honors 2n 2 5 2 1 10 70.0% All A's 3r 2 2 100.0% A \u0026amp; B Honors 3r 5 2 2 1 10 70.0% A \u0026amp; B Honors 4t 1 5 1 7 85.7% A \u0026amp; B Honors St 3 1 4 75.0% All A's 6t 2 1 3 100.0% A \u0026amp; B Honors 6t 4 2 6 66.7% TOTAL 31 48 3 10 2 94 84.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black BIRACIAL COMMITT P.T.A. BOARD MBR VIPS 2 2 1 2 2 100.0% 4 50.0% 1 100.0% BM 1 1  11/03/97 PAGE 1 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 1 3 2 2 3 6 33.3% 66.7% 1 100.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE PARENT WORKSHOPS SCHOOL IMPROV CO Pupil Services BM BF 1 2 3 WM WF 2 2 2 OM OF Total 3 4 5 % Black 33.3% 50.0% 60.0% BM 11/03/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM 1 WF 1 2 OM  2 OF Total 2 2 % Black 50.0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BCC Discipline Sunshine BM BF 2 3 3 WM WF OM 1 1 3 OF Total 3 % Black 66.7% 3 100.0% 7 42.9% 11/03/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM  3 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE School Safety STUDENT COUNCIL FIELD DAY BM BF 5 2 4 WM WF 1 1 1 OM OF Total % 6 3 5 Black 83.3% 66.7% 80.0% 11/03/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM  4 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE PROFESSIONAL GRO STOP COTILLION PROGR BM BF 1 1 2 WM WF 1 3 1 OM OF Total 2 4 3 % Black 50.0% 25.0% 66. 7% 11/03/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM  5 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .\u0026gt; 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BLACK HISTORY MO COE SCHOOL RECRUITME BM BF 2 1 2 WM WF 1 1 2 1 OM OF Total 4 3 3 % Black 50.0% 33.3% 66. 7% 11/03/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 3  6 OF Total 3 % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM TOTAL 39 2 24 OF Total % Black 65 60.0% BM  11/03/97 PAGE 7 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 2 5 10 17 41. 2% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. TESA 13 RACE RELATIONS HUMAN RELATIONS CULTURAL RELAT. 20 Curriculum Study Leadership Acad 1 Mastery Learning Multi-C Counsel. Abacus 20 PET 25 WHOLE LANGUAGE 2 COOP LEARNING 15 SAT -8 TEST INTE 20 SDDI 20 COE 20 PATHWAYS TO EXCE 20 AR READING ASSO. 3 TOTAL 76 103  11/03/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 13 13 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 11/03/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PET 26 CYCLE 1 17 CYCLE 2 8 CYCLE 3 1 COOP. LEARNING 15 ACADEMIC SUPPORT CULTURAL DIVERS! 1 LEARNING STYLES 4 TOTAL 72  PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 11/03/97 SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97  PAGE 1 Ba)KER -    LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT QUIZ:SSPLST STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BOOKER POSITION B L A C K W H I T E 0 T H E R TOTAL % M F M F M F BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 ASST PRINCIPAL 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 1 12 1 18 0 0 32 40.63 COUNSELOR 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 MEDIA SPECIALIST 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 REMDL/COMP READING 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 REMDL/COMP MATH 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 GIFTED/TALENTED 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 RESOURCE/TEACHER 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 SPEECH THERAPIST 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 00 MUSIC 0 1 1 1 0 0 3 33.33 ART 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 00 PE 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 00 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 1 17 6 26 0 0 50 36.00 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 2.00 34.00 12.00 52.00 00 00 so 36.00  POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES OTHER LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BOOKER B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 6 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 4 15 0 3 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 18.18 68.18 00 13. 64 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 7 4 1 2 1 1 5 1 22 00 22 % BLACK 85.71 100.00 00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 00 86.36 86.36  POSITION TOTAL PERCENT  LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BOOKER B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 5 32 6 29 6.94 44.44 8.33 40.28 0 .OD 0 .oo 72 72 % BLACK 51.39 51.39    01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 17 22 17 18 1 2 77 50.6% SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 01 20 26 12 13 2 1 74 62.2% 02 16 27 15 21 5 1 85 50.6% 03 23 22 20 17 1 2 85 52.9% 04 22 24 18 21 1 3 89 51. 7% 05 27 21 22 20 1 4 95 50.5% 06 29 20 19 25 2 1 96 51.0% Total 154 162 123 135 13 14 601 52.6% 25.6% 27.0% 20.5% 22.5% 2.2% 2.3%   01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K BROWN M. 1 3 7 5 5 20 50.0% K HURST M. 1 4 6 4 4 1 19 52.6% K JEFFRIES v. 1 5 4 4 4 2 19 47.4% K WALLS B. 1 5 5 4 5 19 52.6% 01 FARLEY J. 1 6 5 3 5 19 57.9% 01 HESTIR J. 1 5 7 4 2 1 19 63.2% 01 JONES A. 1 5 6 1 4 1 17 64.7% 01 HARRIS K. 1 4 8 4 2 1 19 63.2% 02 FAIR D. 1 4 7 4 5 1 21 52.4% 02 GRAVES I. 1 4 7 4 5 1 21 52.4% 02 HIGDON T. 1 4 6 3 6 2 21 47.6% 02 TAGGART M. 1 4 7 3 5 2 21 52.4%   01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 03 ELLINGTON L. l 6 5 5 4 l 21 52.4% 03 FUTRELL C. 1 6 5 5 5 1 22 50.0% 03 HALLUM A. 1 5 6 5 4 1 21 52.4% 03 TUCKER T. 1 6 6 5 4 21 57 .1% 04 AUSTIN C. 1 5 6 5 6 1 23 47.8% 04 ELLINGTON L. 1 1 1 .0% 04 HARDING C. 1 7 5 4 4 1 21 57 .1% 04 HAYDEN D. 1 5 6 5 5 1 22 50.0% 04 TAYLOR c. 1 5 6 3 6 1 21 52.4% 05 HIPPS D. 1 7 6 6 5 1 25 52.0% 05 JOHNSON M. 1 7 5 6 5 1 24 50.0% 05 KELLEY C. 1 6 5 5 5 1 2 24 45.8%   01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 05 LEHNHOFF D. 1 7 5 5 5 22 54.5% 06 COLFORD S. 1 7 6 4 7 24 54.2% 06 HARRIS P. 1 7 5 5 5 1 23 52.2% 06 HARRIS K. 1 1 1 .0% 06 NEWCOMB D. 1 8 4 5 6 1 24 50.0% 06 WEIR N. 1 7 5 4 7 1 24 50.0%   01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 1 1 1 0 0 0 3 66.7% Speech or Language Impaired 5 2 4 1 0 0 12 58.3% TOTALS 8 3 5 1 0 0 17 64.7%   01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 13 15 31 23 2 4 88 31. 8%   01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 3 1 1 5 80.0% 01 2 1 1 4 75.0% 02 1 1 .0% 03 2 1 3 66.7% 04 1 1 100.0%   01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Just Say No 27 21 14 31 2 2 97 49.5% 1 1 2 50.0% Jazzy Jaguars 18 11 18 14 3 64 45.3% 1 1 2 50.0% Peer Helpers 6 10 7 10 1 1 35 45.7% 1 1 2 50.0% BAMBIS 12 12 12 12 48 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% Student Council .0% 2 2 .0% Fire Marshal ls 1 2 2 1 6 50.0% 1 1 100.0% Flag Monitors 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 100.0% DARE 24 28 20 20 2 1 95 54.7% 1 3 4 25.0% TOTAL 89 84 73 89 5 7 347 49.9% 1 6 9 16 43.8%  01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF BIRACIAL P.T.A. BOARD MBR Discipline Hear 1 1 3 WM WF 1 1 1 1 3 OM OF Total % 2 2 8 Black 50.0% .0% 50.0% BM 1 2  10/29/97 PAGE 1 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % 1 4 2 2 17 4 25 Black 50.0% 24.0% .0%  01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Field Day Parent Involment Reading BM 1 BF 2 1 2 WM WF 3 4 1 OM OF Total 5 6 3 % Black 40.0% 33.3% 66.7% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 4 5  2 OF Total 9 % Black .0% .0% 44.4%  01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Awards/Honors School Spirit Science Fair BM BF 2 1 1 WM 1 WF 2 5 2 OM OF Total % 5 6 3 Black 40.0% 16.7% 33.3% BM 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 7 3 WM 2 WF OM 4  3 OF Total % 11 5 Black 63.6% 60.0%  01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Sunshine Behavior Mange. COE BM 1 1 BF WM 4 3 1 1 WF 3 2 2 OM OF Total % 7 4 7 Black 57 .1% 25.0% 57 .1% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 4 2  4 OF Total % 6 Black .0% 66.7% .0%   01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 5 SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Partners In Ed 1 1 2 50.0% .0% School Safety 2 1 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% TOTAL 6 22 5 32 65 43 .1% 7 20 7 28 62 43.5%  01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 39 TESA 31 HUMAN RELATIONS 47 TEAM BUILDING 50 TOTAL 167  10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 10 10  01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 CYCLE 1 23 CYCLE 2 6 CYCLE 3 8 COOP. LEARNING 48 ACADEMIC SUPPORT 4 TOTAL 89  PAGE 1  01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. 42 TOTAL 42  PAGE 1  01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 Learning styles 48 Testing 50 TOTAL 98  PAGE 1 POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST REMDL/COMP READING GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BRADY B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 POSITIONS 0 8 1 18 0 0 00 29.63 3.70 66.67 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 18 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 27 00 27 % BLACK 100.00 33.33 00 00 100.00 00 00 00 00 29.63 29.63 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK SECRETARY INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BRADY B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 2 12 1 2 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 11. 76 70.59 5.88 11. 76 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 4 2 1 1 5 4 17 00 17 % BLACK 50.00 50.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 82.35 82.35 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 BRADY B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 2 20 2 20 4.55 45.45 4.55 45.45 0 .oo 0 .oo 44 44 % BLACK 50.00 50.00 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 19 17 5 10 1 2 54 66.7% P4 4 5 4 4 1 0 18 50.0% SP 6 0 1 1 0 0 8 75.0% 01 26 20 6 8 1 1 62 74.2% 02 21 16 11 10 3 2 63 58. 7% 03 21 15 9 2 1 1 49 73.5% 04 17 8 3 4 6 7 45 55.6% 05 18 9 4 8 3 2 44 61.4% 06 5 10 6 0 4 3 28 53.6% Total 137 100 49 47 20 18 371 63.9% 36.9% 27.0% 13.2% 12.7% 5.4% 4.9% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K DUGAN F. 1 7 6 1 4 1 19 68.4% K JONES P. 1 5 4 4 3 16 56.3% K TOLBERT I. 1 7 7 2 1 1 18 77.8% K WASHINGTON M. 1 1 1 .0% P4 MCCLURKAN E. 1 4 5 4 4 1 18 50.0% 01 GOVAR M. 1 1 1 .0% 01 KOON B. 1 1 1 .0% 01 ROSE s. 1 9 7 2 1 1 20 80.0% 01 SCRUBBS v. 1 8 6 2 4 20 70.0% 01 WASHINGTON M. 1 9 7 1 2 1 20 80.0% 02 CROMEDY G. 1 6 5 3 2 2 1 19 57.9% 02 GOVAR M. 1 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 02 HARROD A. 1 8 6 3 5 22 63.6% 02 KOON B. 1 7 4 5 3 1 1 21 52.4% 03 JOHNSON D. 1 13 9 2 1 25 88.0% 03 OLIVERS. 1 8 6 7 2 1 24 58.3% 04 GOVAR M. 1 8 3 2 3 5 21 52.4% 04 MCINTYRE G. 1 2 2 100.0% 04 YOUNGE. 1 9 5 1 1 6 2 24 58.3% 05 HANNAHS B. 1 10 4 2 2 2 20 70.0% 05 HIGHT R. 1 8 5 2 6 1 2 24 54.2% 05 MCINTYRE G. 1 2 1 3 66.7% 06 HANNAHS B. 1 1 1 100.0% 06 MCINTYRE G. 1 2 1 3 66.7% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total Count Black 06 VARDAMAN T. 1 5 9 6 4 3 27 51. 9% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 3 0 0 1 0 0 4 75.0% Multihandicapped 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 50.0% Other Health Impaired 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 .0% Specific Learning Disability 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Speech or Language Impaired 5 0 2 3 1 0 11 45.5% Visually Handicapped 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% TOTALS 10 1 3 5 1 0 20 55.0% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 5 5 8 2 5 0 25 40.0% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 2 2 100.0% 01 2 1 3 100.0% 05 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black STUDENT COUNCIL 6 3 4 4 17 52.9% 2 2 .0% PEER FACILITATOR 10 9 2 3 1 3 28 67.9% 1 1 .0% JUST SAY NO CLUB 18 10 7 6 6 5 52 53.8% 1 1 .0% BRADY SCH.CHOIR 9 9 5 6 5 5 39 46.2% 1 1 .0% GIFTED \u0026amp; TALENT 5 5 8 2 5 25 40.0% 1 1 .0% DRILL TEAM 14 4 5 23 60.9% 2 2 100.0% CHAPTER I READIN 36 18 5 3 3 7 72 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% CHAPTER I MATH 22 18 5 4 5 5 59 67.8% 1 1 2 50.0% PEER TUTORS 10 9 3 2 1 4 29 65.5% 1 1 .0% AMBASSADORS 7 5 4 4 1 1 22 54.5% 1 1 .0% CONFLICT MANAGRS 15 10 3 2 6 1 37 67.6% 1 1 .0% TOTAL 138 110 46 40 33 36 403 61.5% 4 11 15 26.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Most Imp Aca K- 3 1 1 8 13 30.8% Prine. (A's) 1- 8 9 10 10 8 4 49 34.7% Hon.Rol(A/B) 1- 34 21 13 12 3 14 97 56.7% Citizenship P- 58 37 20 23 11 20 169 56.2% Attendance P- 30 25 12 9 8 17 101 54.5% Most Imp Cit K- 3 6 2 6 2 5 24 37.5% TOTAL 136 99 57 61 32 68 453 51. 9% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black BIRACIAL COMMITT 1 2 1 1 5 60.0% 1 1 2 4 50.0% P.T.A. BOARD MEM 1 1 1 3 6 33.3% 1 2 1 3 7 42.9% VIPS/P.I.E 1 1 2 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE PARENT WORKSHOPS SCHOOL IMPROV CO SCH.RECRUIT TEAM BM BF 2 WM WF 1 2 OM OF Total % 5 Black .0% .0% 40.0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 2 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE TEXTBOOK SELECT BUILDING COORDIN STAFF DEV COMM BM BF 3 2 WM WF 1 1 3 2 OM OF Total % 1 7 4 Black 42.9% 50.0% 10/29/97 PAGE 3 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE GUIDANCE COMM FIELD DAY MEDIA CONSULTANT BM BF WM WF 3 1 4 4 1 OM OF Total 7 5 1 % Black 42.9% 20.0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 4 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE TALENT SHOW STUDENT COUNCIL PUPIL SERVICES BM BF WM WF 2 3 2 2 4 OM OF Total % 4 2 7 Black 50.0% .0% 42.9% BM 10/29/97 PAGE 5 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % 1 1 1 Black 2 50.0% 1 100.0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE SUNSHINE COMM DISCIPLINE MANAG GRANT WRITING BM BF WM WF 1 4 1 6 1 1 OM OF Total 7 6 1 % Black 14.3% 66.7% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE 6 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 7 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black GRADE LEVEL CH 3 4 7 42.9% .0% MULTICULTURAL CM 2 6 8 25.0% .0% TOTAL 2 30 6 49 87 36.8% 2 9 1 9 21 52.4% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 14 TESA 12 RACE RELATIONS 11 HUMAN RELATIONS 10 CULTURAL RELAT. 7 2 3 PRE SCHOOL INSER 12 15 SCHOOL LAW 12 COE 15 READING STYLES 13 MULTICULT ED 10 6 BRADY MISSION ST 11 EARLY CHILDHOOD 1 1 1 1 TOTAL 128 16 9 4 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING WINNEBAGO COMPUTER PROGRAM LIBRARY IN SERV WINDOWS 95 WORDS 1 WORDS@ POWER POINT 1 POWER POINT 2 TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 14 10 6 2 12 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 49 9 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP 14 CLASSROOM MGMT. 15 POSITIVE DISCIP. 4 SCHOOL LAW 12 SCHOOL WIDE DISC 9 6 6 CLASSROOM MANAG 15 TOTAL 65 4 6 6 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 AT RISK 14 LEARNING STYLES 20 SELF ESTEEM 8 2 4 PORTOFOLIO ASSES 16 1 INTERGRAT CURRIC 12 ABACUS TRAINING 14 WINDOW ON SCIENC 8 2 PARENT INVOLVE 8 2 SIP 5 1 1 TEACHER EVALUAT 6 1 COMPUTER INSERV 10 9 1 2 MATH MANIULATIV 9 8 ESL/LEP 9 30 1 3 SELF ESTEEM 8 5 WRIT ACROSS CURR 9 REACH INSERVICE 12 SCIENCE HANDS-ON 13 2 AR K-4 CRUSADE 1 POLAROID CAMERA 2 EARLY CDLHD CONV 4 SOC STUD INSERV 25 26 SUCCESS FOR ALL 15 TOTAL 206 103 10 10 POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL ASST PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC ART PE CURRICULUM SPECIALIST LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CARVER B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 23 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 1 33 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 1 13 1 30 0 1 46 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 2.17 28.26 2.17 65.22 00 2.17 46 % BLACK 00 100.00 24.24 50.00 00 00 00 100.00 100.00 00 100.00 100.00 30.43 30.43 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CARVER B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 5 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 1 4 0 1 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 4 15 0 6 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 16.00 60.00 00 24.00 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 5 5 1 2 1 5 6 25 00 25 % BLACK 100.00 100.00 00 50.00 00 60.00 83.33 76.00 76.00 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CARVER B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 5 28 1 36 1 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 7.04 39.44 1.41 50.70 0 .oo 1. 41 71 71 % BLACK 46.48 46.48 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 9 21 16 10 2 1 59 50.8% SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 01 21 16 19 11 1 1 69 53.6% 02 22 23 26 16 1 2 90 50.0% 03 29 19 19 19 3 1 90 53.3% 04 32 20 25 11 1 5 94 55.3% 05 31 19 25 21 2 2 100 50.0% 06 24 26 20 22 0 2 94 53.2% Total 168 144 150 110 10 14 596 52.3% 28.2% 24.2% 25.2% 18.5% 1. 7% 2.3% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K DANIELS. 1 4 7 5 2 1 1 20 55.0% K DOYNE A. 1 3 7 6 4 20 50.0% K HOOKER M. 1 2 7 5 4 1 19 47.4% 01 GLENN L. 1 7 5 6 4 1 23 52.2% 01 HAMPTON H. l 7 5 7 3 1 23 52.2% 01 SKUBAL E. 1 7 6 6 4 23 56.5% 02 JOSEPH J. 1 6 6 7 4 23 52.2% 02 SMITH-MALLETT G. 1 6 7 6 2 1 22 59.1% 02 MCKENDRY S. 1 5 6 6 6 23 47.8% 02 YARBROUGH L. 1 5 4 7 4 1 1 22 40.9% 03 CARTWRIGHT J. 1 6 5 5 4 2 22 50.0% 03 HURD L. 1 7 5 5 5 1 23 52.2% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 03 MUNNS P. 1 9 5 4 4 22 63.6% 03 PENN P. 1 7 4 5 5 1 22 50.0% 04 BUCK v. 1 9 5 6 2 1 23 60.9% 04 HARRISON K. 1 8 5 6 4 1 24 54.2% 04 JESTER J. 1 8 4 6 3 1 2 24 50.0% 04 MUNNS P. 1 1 1 100.0% 04 WASHINGTON K. 1 7 5 7 2 1 22 54.5% 05 BLANKENSHIP K. 1 8 4 6 5 1 1 25 48.0% 05 GLENN B. 1 8 4 7 5 1 25 48.0% 05 HARNESS E. 1 8 6 5 5 1 25 56.0% 05 PACE T. 1 7 5 7 6 25 48.0% 06 BYRD D. 1 6 6 5 5 1 23 52.2% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET Class Teacher 06 06 06 FLEMING L. SHIELDS H. THOMAS V. BM ******TEACHER****** BF WM 1 WF 1 1 OM OF SP 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 6 6 5 6 23 52.2% 6 7 5 5 1 24 54.2% 6 7 5 6 24 54.2% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPR03 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Autism 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 3 1 1 1 0 0 6 66.7% Speech or Language Impaired 7 0 1 0 0 0 8 87.5% TOTALS 11 1 2 1 0 0 15 80.0% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 29 20 52 45 3 9 158 31.0% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 1 1 1 3 66.7% 01 1 1 .0% 02 1 1 1 3 33.3% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE  1 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black FIRE MARSHALS 2 1 1 2 6 50.0% 1 1 100.0% JUST SAY NO 23 27 22 21 1 94 53.2% 1 1 2 50.0% YEARBOOK STAFF 1 2 3 7 1 14 21. 4% 1 1 2 50.0% PEER TUTORS 4 8 7 9 1 29 41.4% 1 1 2 50.0% AMBASSADORS .0% 1 1 2 50.0% MATH OLYMPAID .0% 1 1 .0% SCIENCE CLUB 4 3 3 3 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% NEWS TEAM 4 5 5 4 1 19 47.4% 1 1 .0% ODESSY OF MIND .0% 1 1 .0% THINKING CAP QUI 2 2 3 5 1 2 15 26. 7% 1 1 .0% SUMMER READING 37 36 13 6 92 79.3% 2 1 5 8 25.0% MATH FAIR .0% 1 1 .0% INVENT AMERICA .0% 1 1 2 50.0% SCIENCE FAIR .0% 1 1 2 50.0% SPACE FAIR .0% .0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black CARDINAL CLUB 9 8 6 23 39.1% .0% TOTAL 77 93 65 63 2 5 305 55.7% 10 1 17 28 35.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black COURT. KIDS K .0% COURT. KIDS 1 .0% COURT. KIDS 2 .0% COURT. KIDS 3 .0% COURT. KIDS 4 .0% COURT. KIDS 5 .0% COURT. KIDS 6 .0% A HONOR ROLL lS 9 7 15 10 1 1 43 37.2% A/B HONOR RL lS 8 9 3 1 21 81.0% A HONOR ROLL 2N 5 8 15 12 2 42 31.0% A/B HONOR RL 2N 11 7 1 3 1 1 24 75.0% A HONOR ROLL 3R 6 4 18 7 1 5 41 24.4% A/B HONOR RL 3R 9 7 3 4 23 69.6% A HONOR ROLL 4T 4 6 13 15 2 2 42 23.8% A/B HONOR RL 4T 12 7 10 4 33 57.6% A HONOR ROLL ST .0% A/B HONOR RL ST .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black A HONOR ROLL 6T .0% A/B HONOR RO 6T .0% TOTAL 64 55 78 56 7 9 269 44.2% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black BIRACIAL COMMITT 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 1 1 4 50.0% P.T.A. BOARD MBR 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 7 12 41. 7% VIPS 1 1 1 1 4 25.0% 2 2 .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % PUPIL SERV. TEAM LEADERSHIP COE RECRUITMENT TEAM 2 4 2 1 5 10 2 7 15 4 Black 28.6% 26.7% 50.0% 10/29/97 PAGE 2 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF 1 1 1 1 2 1 OM OF Total % 3 4 Black .0% 33.3% 50.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % STP CONSULT TEAM BCC HONORS COMMITTEE 5 2 2 1 2 7 2 3 1 13 7 5 Black 38.5% 28.6% 40.0% 10/29/97 PAGE 3 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF 1 1 2 1 OM OF Total % 4 1 Black 50.0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % GIT SCH. COMMITT HEALTH ACTION TM COURT. KIDS 4 2 2 1 6 1 10 3 3 Black 40.0% 66.7% 66.7% BM 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF 1 1 1 OM 4 OF Total % 2 1 Black .0% 50.0% .0%  01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black TOTAL 28 6 41 2 77 36.4% 10/29/97 PAGE 5 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 5 8 2 18 33 39.4% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 42 TESA 32 RACE RELATIONS 17 HUMAN RELATIONS 17 CULTURAL RELAT. 12 AT-RISK 25 TOTAL 145 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 6 3 3 3 15 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING ACADEMIC SUPPORT TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 32 11 5 34 2 2 84 2 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP 30 1 CLASSROOM MGMT. 33 GOALS OF MISBEHA 40 5 POSITIVE DISPLIN 40 5 GREEN CIRCLE 4 TOTAL 147 11 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 LITERATURE BASED 22 BALANCED WRITING 2 WHOLE LANGUAGE 21 WRITE MORE LEARN 2 MAST/FOSS TRAIN! 20 WRITE GRP WKSP 7 LEARNING STYLES 8 ADD/ADHD 8 PORTFOLIO ASSESS 5 INTEGRATING CURR 29 HAT TRAINING 3 MATH/LANG ART PR 33 DEFIANT CHILD 46 SCHOOL IMPROVEME 48  MULTIPLE INTELLI 49 AETN-CRIT. VIEW! 45 ECOE INTRODUCTIO 40 TEACH SELF DISC! 45 MC RAT 5 3 DISCIPLINE MGMT 8 CMSIMON AWARD 2 EXPANING REACH 2 PATHWAY TO EXCEL 43 G/T IDENTIFICATI 40 LRSD SCIENCE 30 TOTAL 563 3    POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL ASST PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS VOCATIONAL TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC ART PE AUXILIARY TEACHER SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CENTRAL B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 10 17 11 37 0 0 1 7 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 POSITIONS 16 31 21 47 0 0 13.91 26.96 18.26 40.87 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 2 1 5 75 10 6 2 4 1 3 3 1 2 115 00 115 % BLACK 100.00 100.00 60.00 36.00 80.00 33.33 00 50.00 00 33.33 00 00 50.00 40.87 40.87 NO\\I 4 i997 Qrr\\CE Of DtSEGl\\tGA110N MOtU10RING POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS ATTENDANCE CLERK CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK REGISTRAR SECRETARY SECURITY OFFICER SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CENTRAL B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 8 0 1 0 2 10 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 4 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 14 17 1 8 0 2 SUBTOTAL PERCENT QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 3 11 13 1 1 7 5 1 42 33.33 40.48 2.38 19.05 00 4.76 42 % BLACK 66.67 72.73 92.31 00 00 42.86 100.00 100.00 73.81 73.81 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CENTRAL B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 30 48 22 55 2 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 19.11 30.57 14.01 35.03 0 .oo 1. 27 157 157 % BLACK 49.68 49.68 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 20 12 0 0 0 1 33 97.0% SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 10 210 246 113 127 8 7 711 64 .1% 11 160 204 122 148 10 5 649 56 .1% 12 104 139 93 100 7 10 453 53.6% Total 494 601 328 375 25 23 1846 59.3% 26.8% 32.6% 17.8% 20.3% 1.4% 1. 2% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l - CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - - -Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black ADAIR G. 1 4 3 1 8 87.5% ATKINS L. 1 41 59 21 15 1 137 73.0% BECKER M. 1 15 38 37 53 1 144 36.8% BLAIR S. 1 5 1 2 8 62.5% BLEVINS P. 1 26 36 23 30 1 1 117 53.0% BOYETTE. 1 26 57 24 32 1 140 59.3% BRACK R. 1 28 72 5 16 2 1 124 80.6% BRANDON E. 1 44 43 12 5 4 108 80.6% BROADNAX-THRA B. 1 52 52 10 10 1 125 83.2% BROOKS S. 1 34 50 20 11 1 1 117 71.8% BROWN J. 1 9 12 37 45 5 5 113 18.6% CALDWELL s. 1 4 12 24 54 3 7 104 15.4% CALLAWAY N. 1 32 33 18 22 2 1 108 60.2% CARR P. 1 37 52 21 18 2 130 68.5% CARUTH P. 1 11 16 26 39 2 3 97 27.8% CHAMBLISS P. 1 12 17 14 38 3 4 88 33.0% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l - CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - - -Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black CHANDLER J. 1 40 44 12 10 2 108 77.8% COBB J. 1 4 10 35 52 6 9 116 12 .1% COLBURN M. 1 19 46 31 35 2 3 136 47.8% COLE J. 1 15 18 16 38 2 3 92 35.9% COLLINS R. 1 45 49 13 9 2 118 79.7% COONS. 1 39 17 35 45 2 138 40.6% COOPER V. 1 33 41 24 27 3 2 130 56.9% CORTINEZ K. 1 23 34 33 47 2 1 140 40.7% COX B. 1 40 49 21 22 132 67.4% DANIEL B. 1 7 6 44 19 5 7 88 14.8% DAVIS M. 1 48 33 6 6 3 96 84.4% DEITZ s. 1 19 17 24 19 2 8 89 40.4% DIXON s. 1 40 47 16 13 2 2 120 72.5% DONHAM M. 1 13 29 30 42 2 2 118 35.6% DUMAS E. 1 1 1 100. 0% EASTER M. 1 12 24 29 51 2 2 120 30.0% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CW S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l - CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black EDWARDS J. 1 38 42 19 26 1 126 63.5% EVANS K. 1 25 33 18 12 88 65.9% FIELDS W. 1 21 31 7 1 1 61 85.2% FITZPATRICK Jo. 1 44 48 28 30 150 61. 3% FUTRELL B. 1 32 60 10 21 1 124 74.2% GADBERRY s. 1 6 15 37 69 3 4 134 15. 7% GADDY H. 1 25 11 1 1 38 94.7% GATES K. 1 18 36 33 47 3 137 39.4% GAY A. 1 39 45 21 21 4 130 64.6% GRAY J. 1 58 37 10 2 2 1 110 86.4% GUY K. 1 1 1 100.0% HALL-JONES B. 1 28 9 2 39 94.9% HAMMONS K. 1 41 30 8 8 2 89 79.8% HARDIN G. 1 13 18 30 33 4 3 101 30.7% HARGIS A. 1 9 18 36 69 1 2 135 20.0% HARRIS H. 1 44 32 17 29 3 3 128 59.4% LR~D ' SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l- CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - - Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black HOFFMAN M. 1 27 37 21 19 1 3 108 59.3% HOLLADAY K. 1 28 37 24 36 125 52.0% HOWARD R. 1 8 3 11 100.0% HUFFORD G. 1 6 16 36 49 5 6 118 18.6% JAMES B. 1 1 1 100.0% JERNIGAN R. 1 31 47 21 24 1 124 62.9% KALB M. 1 33 33 23 29 1 3 122 54 .1% KEARNEY L. 1 11 11 39 24 3 1 89 24.7% LENIEAR H. 1 34 40 23 25 1 123 60.2% LIGON M. 1 11 16 31 24 1 2 85 31. 8% LOYA s. 1 23 43 20 30 1 117 56.4% MAYS G. 1 33 43 18 26 4 124 61. 3% MCDONALD D. 1 34 33 23 14 2 106 63.2% MCDONALD T. 1 2 12 11 14 39 35.9% MCLENDON J. 1 43 40 25 27 1 1 137 60.6% MCMURRAY v. 1 42 48 20 25 1 136 66.2% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l - CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - - -Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black MEADOWS M. 1 43 44 13 3 2 105 82.9% BARNUM R. l 3 12 3 18 83.3% BERRY D. 1 10 4 3 17 82.4% EACKLES v. 1 6 6 100.0% GRUMMER JR c. 1 7 2 2 2 13 69.2% BURCHETT s. 1 12 12 100.0% PERRY M. 1 11 9 3 23 87.0% SKIPPER J. 1 30 6 3 39 92.3% SODERLING L. 1 38 38 100.0% TENPENNY A. 1 6 14 20 100.0% MCCREE D. 1 3 3 100.0% MILES B. 1 6 3 9 100. 0% PRATHER L. 1 26 2 28 92.9% MILLER B. 1 51 41 12 11 1 1 117 78.6% MILLER R. 1 28 48 24 19 6 125 60.8% MOORE K. 1 32 50 23 27 1 133 61. 7% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL C'S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29i School: l - CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL -Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black MORRIS W. 1 1 1 100.0% NASH L. 1 41 45 15 4 1 106 81.1% NASH D. 1 33 41 27 23 124 59. 7% PAIGE JR w. 1 38 28 31 6 4 107 61.7% PAULS. 1 31 54 21 11 2 119 71. 4% PAXTON v. 1 40 53 12 10 2 117 79.5% PEYTON E. 1 27 39 26 6 98 67.3% PIERCE M. 1 40 45 15 15 1 116 73.3% PIERCE s. 1 49 44 8 7 1 109 85.3% PITTMAN c. 1 7 20 30 61 1 119 22.7% POST J. 1 62 29 2 1 94 96.8% REEDY J. 1 32 51 18 25 2 2 130 63.8% ROBERTSON JR T. 1 26 46 13 2 1 88 81.8% ROBINSON c. 1 17 30 12 5 1 65 72. 3% ROUSSEAU N. 1 3 4 5 3 15 46. 7% RUTLEDGE M. 1 34 52 20 21 2 1 130 66.2% LR$D  SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l - CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - - .Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black SCHLESINGER D. 1 35 12 5 4 1 57 82.5% SEWARD D. 1 44 49 15 14 2 1 125 74.4% SHOFNER K. 1 43 44 15 18 1 121 71.9% SIEGEL L. 1 35 48 18 24 3 3 131 63.4% SIEGEL T. 1 3 1 4 .0% SNODGRASS A. 1 44 47 14 6 1 112 81.3% STAFFORD B. 1 27 51 19 24 3 2 126 61. 9% STEADMAN A. 1 14 32 29 44 2 4 125 36.8% TEETER E. 1 52 40 9 14 2 117 78.6% THOMAS A. 1 58 so 13 1 122 88.5% THOMPSON F. 1 56 47 3 2 6 114 90.4% THOMPSON J. 1 19 32 38 49 2 1 141 36.2% THOMPSON L. 1 11 41 32 46 2 4 136 38.2% THREATT c. 1 42 48 20 10 1 121 74.4% VENABLE G. 1 13 67 4 2 1 2 89 89.9% WALKER R. 1 30 49 14 27 2 1 123 64.2% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l - CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL - - .Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black WATSON B. 1 8 15 37 54 4 3 121 19.0% WHISTLE V. 1 38 58 17 15 128 75.0% WHITEHORN D. 1 2 1 3 100.0% WILDER B. 1 22 37 18 23 2 1 103 57.3% WILLIAMS B. 1 1 1 .0% WILLIAMSON M. 1 22 8 2 32 93.8% WILLIAMS G. 1 20 11 2 33 93.9% WILLIS E. 1 37 34 18 11 100 71.0% WILSON C. 1 37 40 20 28 1 1 127 60.6% WILSON N. 1 34 22 23 40 2 3 124 45.2% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 11 5 0 0 0 0 16 100.0% Other Health Impaired 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 .0% Seriously Emotionally Disturbe 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 35 25 9 4 0 0 73 82.2% Speech or Language Impaired 7 6 0 1 0 0 14 92.9% TOTALS 54 36 10 5 0 0 105 85.7% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 78 136 119 163 10 6 512 41. 8% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 10 22 19 3 1 1 46 89 .1% 11 15 13 4 1 1 34 82.4% 12 3 2 5 100.0% 01 LRSD STUDENT GRADUATION DATA LAST YEAR 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 94 151 71 99 5 11 431 56.8% 01 LRSD SECONDARY SUBJECT AREA COURSES FAILED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF TM TF % Black ENGLISH 10 51 30 14 9 1 66 39 77 .1% 11 27 11 11 1 38 12 76.0% 12 13 10 2 2 15 12 85.2% MATH 10 41 24 8 2 49 26 86. 7% 11 21 21 8 3 1 30 24 77.8% 12 6 13 2 3 1 8 17 76.0% HISTORY/SOC STUDIES 10 47 30 11 2 1 59 32 84.6% 11 5 6 9 14 6 55.0% 12 13 4 3 3 16 7 73.9% SCIENCE 10 16 16 5 3 1 22 19 78.0% 11 15 14 7 1 22 15 78.4% 12 9 11 2 5 11 16 74 .1% 01 LRSD STAFF ASSIGNMENT FOR ADVANCED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 PLACEMENT/HONORS/GIFTED/ENRICHED Secondary Only SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL ACADEMIC AREA BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black English 1 4 5 20.0% Math 1 1 3 5 40.0% Science 2 2 3 7 28.6% Social Studies 1 1 2 .0% Foreign Language 5 1 6 .0% TOTAL 1 4 3 16 1 25 20.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Football 53 17 70 75.7% 4 4 .0% Drill Team 26 26 100.0% 1 1 .0% Cheerleaders 1 7 10 18 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% Student Govt 4 14 6 3 2 1 30 60.0% 1 1 .0% TAILS 10 39 2 11 62 79.0% 2 1 3 6 33.3% FCS 1 5 14 45 65 9.2% 1 1 . 0% German Club 7 10 25 13 2 2 59 28.8% 1 1 .0% Young Democrats 3 11 11 39 1 4 69 20.3% 2 2 .0% French Club 5 17 20 32 2 1 77 28.6% 2 2 .0% CCE 5 13 8 1 27 66.7% 1 1 100.0% DECA 4 15 4 23 82.6% 1 1 100.0% FBLA 21 44 5 1 71 91. 5% 3 1 4 75.0% Accpt No Bound 10 22 22 47 6 8 115 27.8% 1 1 2 .0% Rotary Interact .0% 1 1 .0% Ladies Club .0% 2 2 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Gentlemen's Club 41 1 42 97.6% 1 1 100.0% Troubadours 10 23 22 30 2 4 91 36.3% 3 1 3 7 42.9% Beta Club 5 27 50 108 8 9 207 15.5% 2 2 .0% Basketball 27 21 3 3 54 88.9% 2 2 100.0% Volleyball 7 13 20 35.0% 1 1 .0% Baseball .0% 2 2 100.0% Soccer .0% 1 1 .0% Golf .0% 1 1 .0% Tennis .0% 1 1 .0% Track .0% 1 1 .0% Madrigals 7 6 3 16 81. 3% 1 1 100.0% Nat.Honor.Soc. 2 14 21 42 4 4 87 18.4% 2 2 .0% Science Club 1 4 12 31 5 3 56 8.9% 1 1 2 .0% Latin Club 1 4 9 13 1 28 17.9% 1 1 .0% VICA 6 8 7 1 22 63.6% 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black ASO 8 5 2 15 86.7% 1 1 100.0% TOTAL 232 342 251 454 33 38 1350 42.5% 8 13 12 24 1 58 36.2% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Supt. Honor 4 13 21 1 5 44 9 .1% A Honor Roll 1 9 36 64 7 10 127 7.9% B+ Honor 7 38 38 88 2 7 180 25.0% B Honor Roll 30 57 38 49 4 5 183 47.5% TOTAL 38 108 125 222 14 27 534 27.3% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black BIRACIAL COMMITT .0% .0% PTSA BOARD 1 2 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 6 50.0% GIFTED/TALENTED 1 1 1 1 4 50.0% 1 1 1 1 4 50.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BLDGS/GROUNDS HOSPITALITY LIBRARY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% BM 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 2 2 1 WM 1 WF 3 12 5 OM 2 OF Total 6 14 6 % Black 33.3% 14.3% 16.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE PROJECT GRAD. SENIOR ACTIV. TEACHER APPREC. BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% BM 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 6 3 6 WM WF 19 12 32 OM 3 OF Total % 25 15 38 Black 24.0% 20.0% 15.8% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE SCHOOL SAFETY HEALTH/WELLNESS AR/DRUG FREE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% BM 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 1 4 1 WM WF 3 3 5 OM 4 OF Total 4 7 6 % Black 25.0% 57 .1% 16. 7% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BOOSTER CLUB PUBLIC RELATIONS TOTAL BM 2 BF WM WF 3 1 OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% 4 10 50.0% BM 2 10/29/97 PAGE 5 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 1 4 5 20.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 31 2 108 143 23.1% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PET 58 TESA 66 COOP. LEARNING 59 LEARN STYLES 3 VARIOUS OTHERS 8 TOTAL 194 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 AT RISK 38 CYCLE 1 9 CYCLE 2 7 CYCLE 3 7 VARIOUS COURSES 13 TOTAL 74 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP 38 CLASSROOM MGMT. 61 ALT ASSESSMENT 18 CONFLICT MGMT. 35 VARIOUS COURSES 11 TOTAL 163 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: Content Area TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 48 5 48 5 PAGE 1 ffiICXJI'    LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT QUIZ:SSPLST STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CHICOT POSITION B L A C K W H I T E 0 T H E R TOTAL % M F M F M F BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 ASST PRINCIPAL 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 0 8 2 14 0 0 24 33.33 COUNSELOR 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 MEDIA SPECIALIST 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 REMDL/COMP READING 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 00 REMDL/COMP MATH 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 GIFTED/TALENTED 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 RESOURCE/TEACHER 0 2 0 4 0 0 6 33.33 SPEECH THERAPIST 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 MUSIC 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 1 14 3 24 0 0 42 35.71 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 2.38 33.33 7 .14 57.14 00 00 42 35.71 POSITION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CHICOT B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL % BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER 1 0 0 2 0 1 4 25.00 CUSTODIANS 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 100.00 MEDIA CLERK 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 SECRETARY 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 00 NURSE 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES 0 7 0 4 0 2 13 53.85 SUPERVISION AIDES 1 2 0 2 0 0 5 60.00 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 4 11 0 12 0 3 30 50.00 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 13. 33 36.67 00 40.00 00 10.00 30 50.00 POSITION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CHICOT B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL % BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL PERCENT 5 25 3 36 6.94 34.72 4.17 50.00 0 .oo 3 4.17 72 72 41.67 41.67 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 23 16 6 6 3 5 59 66 .1% P4 11 7 10 6 1 1 36 50.0% SP 7 6 4 2 1 0 20 65.0% 01 26 25 10 8 4 2 75 68.0% 02 21 30 7 6 5 5 74 68.9% 03 25 26 8 6 6 1 72 70.8% 04 28 19 8 9 3 0 67 70.1% 05 24 23 5 7 2 1 62 75.8% 06 27 21 11 4 4 3 70 68.6% Total 192 173 69 54 29 18 535 68.2% 35.9% 32.3% 12.9% 10.1% 5.4% 3.4% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K ZINAMON B. 1 1 1 100.0% K KERR P. 1 8 4 2 2 1 3 20 60.0% K MURPH K. 1 8 6 2 2 1 1 20 70.0% K SABO D. 1 7 6 2 2 1 1 19 68.4% P4 BARRE F. 1 6 4 5 3 18 55.6% P4 MIMS S. 1 5 3 5 3 1 1 18 44.4% 01 DAVIS L. 1 9 9 3 2 1 1 25 72. 0% 01 ELLIS s. 1 7 9 4 4 1 25 64.0% 01 ZINAMON B. 1 1 l 100.0% 01 TEETER P. 1 10 7 3 2 2 1 25 68.0% 02 EANS s. 1 8 9 2 2 1 3 25 68.0% 02 NEAL L. 1 7 9 3 2 2 1 24 66.7% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 02 WELLS J. 1 6 12 2 2 2 1 25 72.0% 03 HARDESTY s. 1 1 1 100. 0% 03 HOLLINGSWORTH J. 1 7 9 3 2 3 1 25 64.0% 03 ZINAMON 8. 1 1 1 1 1 4 50.0% 03 ROSES. 1 9 9 3 2 2 25 72.0% 03 WILLIAMS F. 1 9 8 2 2 1 22 77.3% 04 BEDOW L. 1 2 1 3 66.7% 04 HARDESTY s. 1 1 1 2 50.0% 04 ISBELL P. 1 11 5 2 3 21 76.2% 04 SHANKS B. 1 10 5 2 3 3 23 65.2% 04 WILLIAMS E. 1 7 9 4 3 23 69.6% 05 BEDOW L. 1 1 1 100. 0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 05 BRYANT G. 1 7 9 1 3 20 80.0% 05 GALYEAN N. 1 9 6 1 1 2 1 20 75.0% 05 HARDESTY S. 1 1 1 2 50.0% 05 JOHNSON J. 1 8 8 3 3 22 72. 7% 06 BEDOW L. 1 1 2 1 4 75.0% 06 CHILCOTE M. 1 8 10 4 1 23 78.3% 06 HARDESTY s. 1 1 1 .0% 06 MALLETT O. 1 9 5 3 2 2 1 22 63.6% 06 PETTUS I. 1 10 6 4 2 1 2 25 64.0% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Autism 1 0 1 0 1 0 3 33.3% Mentally Retarded 3 2 1 1 0 0 7 71. 4% Multihandicapped 0 4 1 0 0 0 5 80.0% Orthopedically Handicapped 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 .0% Other Health Impaired 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Seriously Emotionally Disturbe 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 .0% Specific Learning Disability 3 1 1 2 1 0 8 50.0% Speech or Language Impaired 9 9 6 3 1 0 28 64.3% Visually Handicapped 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% TOTALS  19 17 10 8 3 0 57 63.2% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 9 22 9 7 0 0 47 66.0% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 2 1 1 1 5 60.0% 01 1 1 2 2 1 7 28.6% 02 1 1 2 100.0% 03 1 1 100.0% 04 1 1 .0% 05 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Ambassadors 12 16 4 5 1 38 73.7% 1 l 2 50.0% Cafeteria Monit. 3 1 1 5 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% Student Council 6 14 5 1 26 76.9% 1 2 1 4 8 37.5% Flag Monitors 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 .0% Fire Marshall 6 3 2 4 15 60.0% 1 1 .0% Quiz Bowl Team .0% .0% Peer Tutor's 4 8 2 6 1 21 57 .1% 1 1 2 50.0% Broadcast Team 2 2 2 1 1 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% Cheerleaders 7 2 1 10 70.0% 1 1 .0% Tchr of Tomorrow .0% 1 1 100.0% TOTAL 34 51 16 20 2 2 125 68.0% 1 7 1 10 1 20 40.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black HONOR ROLL 59 113 34 39 6 251 68.5% PERFECT ATTE 76 88 29 22 4 219 74.9% TOTAL 135 201 63 61 10 470 71.5% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BIRACIAL COMMITT P.T.A. BOARD MBR VIPS BM BF WM WF 1 1 1 OM OF Total % 2 1 Black .0% 50.0% .0% BM 1 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF 4 1 OM 4 1 OF Total % Black .0% 9 55.6% 1 100.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE PARENT WORKSHOPS SCHOOL IMPROV CO Parent Recruit. BM BF 1 2 2 WM 1 WF 2 1 OM OF Total % 6 3 Black .0% 50.0% 66.7% BM 2 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM 1 WF 1 1 OM 2 OF Total % 2 3 Black .0% 50.0% 66.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF TOTAL 1 5 1 5 OM OF Total % Black 12 50.0% 10/29/97 PAGE 3 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 3 6 6 15 60.0% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PREJUDICE REDUC. TESA RACE RELATIONS HUMAN RELATIONS CULTURAL RELAT. AUTISM WORKSHOP MATH TASK JOSTENS LG. ARTS TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 4 7 10 1 10 5 24 13 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING ACADEMIC SUPPORT ESL METHODS TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 42 9 43 25 85 34 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 12 12 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 SCH. IMPROVE. SCH. EMERGENCY 45 23 SCH. TESTING 23 1 COMPUTER TRAIN TOTAL 68 24 CLOVERDA1E POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 10 1 11 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 POSITIONS 3 14 1 14 0 0 9.38 43.75 3.13 43.75 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 24 2 1 1 1 1 1 32 00 32 % BLACK 100.00 50.00 50.00 00 00 100.00 100.00 100.00 53.13 53.13 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 3 9 0 3 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 20.00 60.00 00 20.00 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 3 1 1 1 5 4 15 00 15 % BLACK 100.00 100.00 00 100.00 80.00 75.00 80.00 80.00 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 6 23 1 17 12.77 48.94 2.13 36.17 0 .oo 0 .oo 47 47 % BLACK 61.70 61.70 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 30 35 0 4 1 1 71 91. 5% P4 12 16 4 0 0 3 35 80.0% SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 01 43 35 2 4 2 3 89 87.6% 02 32 38 3 1 0 1 75 93.3% 03 39 24 2 1 0 1 67 94.0% 04 25 35 1 2 0 0 63 95.2% 05 27 24 3 2 0 0 56 91.1% 06 21 31 1 0 1 0 54 96. 3% Total 229 238 16 14 4 9 510 91. 6% 44.9% 46.7% 3.1% 2. 7% .8% 1.8% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K EPPERSON B. 1 8 6 2 1 17 82.4% K HALLS. 1 7 9 1 17 94 .1% K MILLER G. 1 7 12 19 100.0% K ROLAX S. 1 8 8 2 18 88.9% P4 BUETTNER s. 1 9 6 1 2 18 83.3% P4 ROGERS C. 1 3 10 3 1 17 76.5% 01 COKELEY G. 1 12 6 1 1 1 1 22 81.8% 01 HENTHORNE M. 1 9 10 1 1 21 90.5% 01 SHUFFIELD K. 1 10 10 1 1 22 90.9% 01 SNOWDEN S. 1 1 1 100.0% 01 WALKERS. 1 11 8 2 1 22 86.4% 01 WINEK. 1 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 02 SNOWDEN s. 1 12 11 1 24 95.8% 02 VANECKO A. 1 10 14 1 25 96.0% 02 VINSON W. 1 1 1 100.0% 02 WINEK. 1 10 12 2 1 25 88.0% 03 MCCLAIN M. 1 12 8 2 1 23 87.0% 03 TRIPCONY w. 1 12 6 1 19 94. 7% 03 WHITED. 1 15 10 25 100.0% 04 MURDOCK S. 1 10 10 1 2 23 87.0% 04 STUART D. 1 11 11 22 100.0% 04 VINSON w. 1 4 14 18 100.0% 05 BANKS B. 1 15 10 1 2 28 89.3% 05 WILSON S. 1 12 14 2 28 92.9% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Teacher 06 06 POSITION V. MILLS R. BM ******TEACHER****** BF WM WF OM OF SP 1 1 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** BM 12 9 BF 14 17 WM WF 1 OM 1 OF Total % Count Black 27 27 96.3% 96.3% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Other Health Impaired 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 2 2 2 0 0 0 6 66.7% Speech or Language Impaired 7 7 1 1 0 0 16 87.5% TOTALS 10 10 3 1 0 0 24 83.3% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 11 19 0 1 0 0 31 96.8% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 6 3 1 10 90.0% 01 3 3 1 7 85.7% 02 3 3 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PEER HELPERS 11 12 1 24 95.8% 2 1 3 66.7% AMBASSADORS 9 12 2 1 24 87.5% 1 1 100.0% JUST SAY NO CLUB 8 10 4 2 24 75.0% 1 1 2 100.0% CONFLICT MANAGER 10 11 1 1 1 24 87.5% 1 1 2 50.0% STRAIGHT TALK 70 8 1 79 88.6% 3 3 100.0% POP TALK 72 3 2 77 93.5% 3 3 100.0% BASKET BALL 10 3 13 76.9% 2 2 100. 0% GIFTED PROGRAM 11 18 4 1 34 85.3% 1 1 .0% M \u0026amp; M CLUB .0% 1 1 .0% TOTAL 129 135 22 8 2 3 299 88.3% 6 8 4 18 77.8% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD ALL A's ALL A's \u0026amp; B PERFECT ATT CITIZENSHIP MOST IMPROVE TOTAL GRADE BM BF WM WF 10/29/97 OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% PAGE 1 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black SUNSHINE 1 5 6 16. 7% P.T.A. BOARD MBR 1 2 3 33.3% VIPS 1 1 100.0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 3 1 1 OF Total % 4 Black .0% 75.0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black HOSPITALITY 1 3 2 6 66.7% .0% SCHOOL IMPROV co 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% DISCIPLINE 4 1 4 9 44.4% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black STAFF DEVELOPMEN 1 1 3 5 40.0% .0% PARTNER IN EDUC 1 1 2 4 50.0% .0% POSITIVE ATTITUD 1 7 1 9 88.9% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE GRANT WRITING PRIN ROUND TABLE TALENT SHOW BM BF 1 6 3 WM WF 1 2 5 1 OM OF Total % 2 12 5 Black .0% 50.0% 80.0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 4 OF Total % Black .0% . 0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE COTILLION BCC CARNIVAL BM BF 1 4 4 1 WM WF 1 1 OM OF Total % Black 4 100.0% 6 2 83.3% 50.0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 5 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % SCIENCE FAIR SCHOOL PAPER BIRACIAL 1 2 1 2 2 Black .0% .0% .0% BM 1 10/29/97 PAGE 6 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF 1 2 OM OF Total % Black 4 .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total TOTAL 6 39 3 35 83 % Black 54.2% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 1 6 4 7 OF Total 11 % Black 63.6% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 16 TESA 7 RACE RELATIONS 26 HUMAN RELATIONS 11 CULTURAL RELAT. 14 TOTAL 74 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 7 6 3 3 19 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 15 1 15 1 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PORTFOLIO ASSESS 1 ABACUS TRAINING 18 PARRNT INVOLVEME 1 TOTAL 20 POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST REMDL/COMP READING GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 DODD B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 POSITIONS 1 6 2 14 0 0 4.35 26.09 8.70 60.87 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 12 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 23 00 23 % BLACK 00 33.33 00 00 00 00 25.00 100.00 100.00 30.43 30.43\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1173","title":"Little Rock School District, school profiles","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1997-10-29"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Cloverdale Junior High School (Little Rock, Ark.)","David O. Dodd Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Dunbar Magnet Middle School (Little Rock, Ark.)","J. A. Fair High School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Fair Park Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School improvement programs","School employees","School integration","Student assistance programs","Students"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District, school profiles"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1173"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nCloverdale Junior High, Dodd Elementary, Dunbar Magnet Junior High, Fair High, Fair Park Elementary\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nCLOVERDALE JR.HIGH  POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL ASST PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS VOCATIONAL TEACHERS COUNSELOR REMDL/COMP READING RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC ART PE SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CLOVERDALE JR HIGH B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 5 8 5 14 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 POSITIONS 10 16 7 22 0 0 18.18 29.09 12.73 40.00 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 2 32 5 2 2 4 1 2 2 2 55 00 55 % BLACK 100.00 50.00 40.63 100.00 50.00 00 25.00 100.00 50.00 00 100.00 47.27 47.27 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS ATTENDANCE CLERK CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK REGISTRAR SECRETARY NURSE SECURITY OFFICER INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CLOVERDALE JR HIGH B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 2 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 10 11 0 4 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 40.00 44.00 00 16.00 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 8 8 1 1 1 1 2 2 25 00 25 % BLACK 100.00 75.00 100.00 00 100.00 00 100.00 100.00 100.00 84.00 84.00 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 CLOVERDALE JR HIGH B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 20 27 7 26 25.00 33.75 8.75 32.50 0 .00 0 .oo 80 80 % BLACK 58.75 58.75 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 07 97 69 12 1 5 6 190 87.4% 08 110 85 6 5 1 8 215 90.7% 09 101 91 4 8 7 7 218 88.1% Total 308 245 22 14 13 21 623 88.8% 49.4% 39.3% 3.5% 2.2% 2 .1% 3.4% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CW S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/291 School: l - CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black ABLES F. 1 4 4 1 9 88.9% ALLEN c. 1 45 43 1 1 4 94 93.6% ANDRESS W. 1 53 42 4 4 1 4 108 88.0% BEEBE S. 1 51 40 2 4 1 4 102 89.2% BENNETT A. 1 53 34 7 1 3 2 100 87.0% BENSON J. 1 49 29 3 1 2 84 92.9% GATELY L. 1 55 27 2 1 4 89 92 .1% BOSTIC K. 1 51 42 2 1 3 99 93.9% BURNETTE D. 1 50 47 2 3 4 4 110 88.2% CHAMBERS A. 1 60 12 6 3 1 82 87.8% CRISWELL D. 1 14 5 2 21 90.5% CROSSNO III J. 1 24 31 4 2 1 62 88.7% CROWDER c. 1 1 1 2 100. 0% DAVIS M. 1 51 42 2 4 3 102 91. 2% DOSS G. 1 19 4 3 1 27 85.2% EARNEST A. 1 44 37 4 2 4 91 89.0% LRSD SECONDARY scHooL els ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/291 School: l ce CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black EDDINGTON K. 1 53 46 3 1 1 4 108 91. 7% ENOCH L. 1 2 3 5 100.0% GULLETT-SHELN T. 1 46 26 6 3 2 83 86.7% HAMILTON O. 1 47 35 4 2 4 92 89 .1% HARPER G. 1 51 43 3 5 3 4 109 86.2% HARRIS A. 1 31 64 3 1 5 104 91.3% HARRIS s. 1 1 1 100.0% HEARN A. 1 46 37 3 4 4 94 88.3% HERVEY s. 1 1 6 7 100.0% HOOPER B. 1 52 41 1 3 2 5 104 89.4% HUNTS. 1 54 39 4 1 2 4 104 89.4% JEFFERS M. 1 44 48 1 3 4 3 103 89.3% JONES D. 1 51 55 2 4 5 2 119 89.1% JONES K. 1 so 36 7 1 3 2 99 86.9% JONES x. 1 45 49 3 5 4 4 110 85.5% KINSEY T. 1 32 23 1 2 58 94.8% LRSD - CLOVERDALE SECONDARY SCHOOL C. S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29 . Schoo1: JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Te.rm: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black KLAIS N. 1 30 26 2 1 1 4 64 87.5% LABATT T. 1 34 33 4 3 2 76 88.2% LAMB C. 1 71 49 3 3 5 4 135 88.9% LEINBACH s. 1 57 44 2 1 1 4 109 92.7% MCFADDEN c. 1 47 47 5 1 2 4 106 88.7% MEDLOCK J. 1 12 5 2 19 89.5% NESMITH E. 1 48 36 2 2 2 90 93.3% NORMAN C. 1 24 4 1 1 1 31 90.3% PATTERSON D. 1 1 1 100.0% PENNINGTON J. 1 48 42 1 3 4 3 101 89 .1% POORE' P. 1 50 42 5 1 2 4 104 88.5% RALEY B. 1 18 3 1 3 25 84.0% RHODES B. 1 44 55 2 2 4 6 113 87.6% RUSH L. 1 48 48 3 4 3 4 110 87.3% SCOTTS. 1 21 24 2 3 2 2  54 83.3% SHUMATE K. 1 45 47 8 1 1 4 106 86.8% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL C.S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/291 School: e CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Te~m: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black SLOAN D. 1 49 26 7 2 1 6 91 82.4% STARLING L. 1 57 41 4 4 4 1 111 88.3% STEPHENS L. 1 54 40 8 1 1 5 109 86.2% TAYLOR T. 1 35 11 1 47 97.9% VAN PELTS. 1 16 18 1 2 7 7 51 66. 7% WICKLIFFE A. 1 35 23 1 1 1 61 95.1% WILLIAMS B. 1 61 45 6 3 1 1 117 90.6% YOUNG K. 1 38 38 2 4 4 86 88.4% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 6 4 0 0 0 0 10 100.0% Orthopedically Handicapped 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.0% Other Health Impaired 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Seriously Emotionally Disturbe 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 31 9 4 0 1 1 46 87.0% Speech or Language Impaired 9 7 3 0 0 0 19 84.2% TOTALS 48 23 7 1 1 1 81 87.7% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 34 36 3 3 0 1 77 90.9% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 07 9 1 2 12 83.3% 08 8 1 1 1 11 81.8% 09 8 7 1 1 1 18 83.3% 01 LRSD SECONDARY SUBJECT AREA COURSES FAILED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF TM TF % Black ENGLISH 07 10 9 2 2 14 9 82.6% 08 13 7 1 1 2 16 8 83.3% 09 27 9 3 1 1 30 11 87.8% MATH 07 12 7 1 2 14 8 86.4% 08 14 7 1 1 1 15 9 87.5% 09 38 15 3 1 2 41 18 89.8% HISTORY /SOC STUDIES 07 9 9 2 11 9 90.0% 08 26 7 1 1 1 28 8 91.7% 09 18 5 4 1 1 22 7 79.3% SCIENCE 07 22 6 1 1 1 24 7 90.3% 08 19 10 1 2 20 12 90.6% 09 25 9 3 1 1 28 11 87.2% 01 LRSD STAFF ASSIGNMENT FOR ADVANCED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 PLACEMENT/HONORS/GIFTED/ENRICHED Secondary Only SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL ACADEMIC AREA BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black English 1 4 5 .0% Math 1 1 2 4 50.0% Science 2 3 1 6 83.3% Social Studies 1 4 1 6 16.7% Foreign Language 1 1 2 .0% TOTAL 4 4 6 9 23 34.8% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Football 42 1 43 97.7% 2 1 3 66. 7% Drill Team 18 18 100. 0% 1 1 100.0% Pride Group 20 3 23 87.0% 1 1 .0% Y-Teens 6 1 1 8 75.0% 1 1 .0% Choir 17 34 2 2 55 92.7% 1 1 .0% Cheerleaders 11 1 12 91. 7% 2 2 .0% Volleyball 17 17 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Monitors .0% 1 2 1 2 6 50.0% Beta .0% 2 2 100.0% FBLA 21 36 4 1 3 65 87.7% 2 1 3 66.7% FHA 4 10 2 2 18 77.8% 1 1 100.0% Student Council 15 20 1 2 38 92.1% 1 1 .0% Poetry Club .0% .0% Peer-Facilitator 10 10 2 3 2 2 29 69.0% 1 2 3 100.0% Year Book 10 20 1 1 32 93.8% 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Newspaper 10 6 16 100.0% 1 1 .0% Girls Basketball .0% 1 1 100.0% Boys Basketball .0% 1 1 100.0% Prin.Council 1 2 1 2 6 50.0% 1 1 100.0% SECME 12 18 3 33 90.9% 1 1 2 50.0% NJHS 10 20 2 32 93.8% 1 2 3 .0% BAND 35 12 47 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Golf .0% .0% Soccer .0% .0% Track(Boys) .0% .0% Track(girls) .0% .0% Teach/Tomorrow .0% .0% TOTAL 207 240 11 23 3 8 492 90.9% 11 10 5 11 37 56.8% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black A Honor Roll 7- 17 23 4 8 2 54 74.1% A/B Honor Ro 7- 58 93 11 16 4 7 189 79.9% C/F StofWk 7- .0% Cadet F/Fli 7 .0% Eagle F/Fli 7 .0% TOTAL 75 116 15 24 6 7 243 78.6% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Biracial Committ P.T.A. BOARD MBR VIPS BM BF WM WF OM 1 OF Total % Black .0% 1 100.0% .0% BM 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 4 1 WM WF OM 2 1 OF Total 6 % Black .0% 66.7% 1 100.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PARENT WORKSHOPS .0% .0% SCHOOL IMPROV CO 10 13 8 19 50 46.0% .0% Stud.Recruit.Com 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Windows .0% .0% TOTAL 10 15 8 20 53 47.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 13 TESA 4 RACE RELATIONS HUMAN RELATIONS 13 CULTURAL RELAT. 7 TOTAL 37 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING ACADEMIC SUPPORT TOTAL PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP 15 CLASSROOM MGMT. 21 Behavior Mgmt 15 Coop Discipline 13 TOTAL 64 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 Student Asst Prg 19 New Futures Ins. 16 Curriculum/L.A. 8 Curriculum/Math 5 Curr/SocialStud. 4 Curr. Science 7 Voe. Ed. Inserv 5 G/T Inserv. 11 Special Ed. Ins 5 Health Ins. 7 Prag Budg.Docum 1 Data Process Ins 2 TOTAL 90 PAGE 1 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 DODD B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 2 2 1 1 4 2 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 4 3 0 4 0 1 12 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 33.33 25.00 00 33.33 00 8.33 12 % BLACK 50.00 100.00 00 00 100.00 00 58.33 58.33 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 QUIZ:SSPLST DODD B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 5 9 2 18 14.29 25.71 5.71 51.43 0 .oo 1 2.86 TOTAL 35 35 % BLACK 40.00 40.00 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 5 9 7 2 1 0 24 58.3% SP 7 0 3 0 0 0 10 70.0% 01 14 4 11 4 2 0 35 51.4% 02 14 16 4 5 0 1 40 75.0% 03 12 5 2 3 0 0 22 77.3% 04 10 11 4 7 1 1 34 61.8% 05 13 14 5 10 0 0 42 64.3% 06 6 7 2 4 0 0 19 68.4% Total 81 66 38 35 4 2 226 65.0% 35.8% 29.2% 16.8% 15.5% 1.8% .9% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K BLUE s. 1 4 4 3 1 1 13 61.5% K HARE v. 1 1 5 4 1 11 54.5% 01 MEEKS J. 1 6 3 6 2 1 18 50.0% 01 MITCHELL v. 1 8 1 5 2 1 17 52.9% 01 SCHOUWEILER s. 1 1 1 100.0% 02 CHAMBERS S. 1 7 9 1 2 1 20 80.0% 02 TAYLOR M. 1 1 1 100.0% 02 RAINES A. 1 7 7 2 3 19 73. 7% 02 SCHOUWEILER s. 1 1 1 2 50.0% 03 SCHOUWEILER s. 1 1 1 2 50.0% 03 TAYLOR L. 1 12 5 2 3 22 77.3% 04 DILDAY J. 1 6 6 2 2 1 17 70.6% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 04 FLEMING D. 1 4 5 2 5 1 17 52.9% 05 FRAWLEY E. 1 8 7 1 6 22 68.2% 05 GOLDMON Y. 1 5 7 4 4 20 60.0% 05 TAYLOR M. 1 3 3 100.0% 06 TAYLOR M. 1 2 2 .0% 06 RIDDLE B. 1 6 7 2 4 19 68.4% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded l 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 2 1 0 1 0 0 4 75.0% Speech or Language Impaired 7 0 1 3 0 0 11 63.6% Visually Handicapped 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 .0% TOTALS 10 1 2 4 0 0 17 64. 7% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 6 7 2 7 0 0 22 59 .1% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 1 1 2 50.0% 01 3 1 4 75.0% 04 1 1 2 50.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Beta Club .0% .0% Student Council .0% .0% Hall Monitors 5 4 1 4 1 15 60.0% .0% Fire Marshal ls 2 2 2 2 8 50.0% 1 1 100.0% Safety Patrol 3 2 1 6 50.0% 2 2 3 7 28.6% Basketball 15 3 18 83.3% 14 8 22 63.6% Cheerleaders 15 11 1 27 55.6% 15 7 22 68.2% Tiny Tumblers .0% .0% Peer Tutors 5 8 1 6 20 65.0% 8 9 1 2 20 85.0% Peer Helpers 4 6 3 2 15 66.7% .0% Conflict Manager .0% 3 2 2 4 11 45.5% Ambassadors 9 3 4 8 24 50.0% .0% Announcements 6 8 2 4 20 70.0% 14 11 9 2 36 69.4% Just Say No .0% .0% Flag Monitors 6 2 1 1 10 80.0% 5 1 1 7 85.7% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black TOTAL 55 48 18 39 1 2 163 63.2% 61 24 30 11 126 67.5% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black All A's 1- 11 7 13 11 1 1 44 40.9% 3.0 1- 22 26 7 14 1 70 68.6% Citizenship K- 28 17 17 22 2 2 88 51.1% Perfect Att. K- 25 19 8 9 1 62 71.0% Acad. Hall K- .0% TOTAL 86 69 45 56 3 5 264 58.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BIRACIAL COMMITT P.T.A. BOARD MBR VIPS BM BF 2 1 WM WF 1 2 2 1 OM OF Total % 4 4 1 Black 50.0% 25.0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE 1 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 2 Black 50.0% 50.0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE P.S.T. Committee Sch. Impv. /COE Discipline Comm. BM 1 1 BF 1 2 WM WF 1 3 4 3 OM OF Total % 4 6 6 Black 25.0% 33.3% 33.3% BM 1 1 1 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 1 1 WM 1 WF 3 4 3 OM 2 OF Total % 4 6 6 Black 25.0% 33.3% 33.3% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Hos pi tali ty 3 3 .0% 1 2 3 33.3% BCC Committee 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% Recruitment 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 1 4 25.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Guidance Comm. TOTAL BM 1 3 BF 9 WM WF 2 4 25 OM OF Total % 5 39 Black 20.0% 30.8% BM 1 5 10/29/97 PAGE 4 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % 8 1 4 25 1 5 40 Black 20.0% 32.5% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: School Climate Human Relations TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PET-Review K-6 12 21 Integrated Curr. 21 21 1 Autism Workshop 3 1 Math Workshop 21 3 1 TOTAL 54 48 1 2 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 Individual Inst. 7 1 Reading Recovery 1 1 1 K-4 Training 5 2 Shurley Method 15 2 1 1 Multi.Intelligen 15 K-Spec.Needs 2 Reading/Economic 3 Early Literacy 6 1 Social Studies 14 Behavior Mgt. 18 18 6 6 TOTAL 53 55 8 10 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 Partners in Educ 2 1 Open Ct. Phonics 21 20 1 TOTAL 23 21 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT QUIZ:SSPLST STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 DUNBAR POSITION B L A C K W H I T E 0 T H E R TOTAL % M F M F M F BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 ASST PRINCIPAL 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 50.00 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 9 8 6 15 0 1 39 43.59 VOCATIONAL TEACHERS 1 2 1 0 0 0 4 75.00 COUNSELOR 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 50.00 MEDIA SPECIALIST 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 GIFTED/TALENTED 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 RESOURCE/TEACHER 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 100.00 SPEECH THERAPIST 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 MUSIC 0 1 1 1 0 0 3 33.33 ART 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 00 PE 1 1 1 0 0 0 3 66.67 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 13 15 11 21 0 1 61 45.90 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 21.31 24.59 18. 03 34.43 00 1. 64 61 45.90 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS ATTENDANCE CLERK CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK REGISTRAR SECRETARY NURSE SECURITY OFFICER INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 DUNBAR B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 5 12 0 5 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 22.73 54.55 00 22.73 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 6 8 1 1 1 1 2 1 22 00 22 % BLACK 100.00 83.33 100.00 00 00 00 00 100.00 100. 00 77.27 77.27 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 QUIZ:SSPLST DUNBAR B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M  F M F M F 18 27 11 26 21.69 32.53 13.25 31.33 0 .oo 1 1.20 TOTAL 83 83 % BLACK 54.22 54.22 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 07 78 86 49 41 9 9 272 60.3% 08 72 82 50 42 6 8 260 59.2% 09 70 59 49 52 8 7 245 52. 7% Total 220 227 148 135 23 24 777 57.5% 28.3% 29.2% 19.0% 17.4% 3.0% 3 .1% LRSD. oeDUNBAR SECONDARY SCHOOL C. S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH - Texm: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black ADKINS c. 1 30 37 24 20 4 4 119 56.3% AXE. 1 25 35 27 23 4 3 117 51.3% JOHNSON K. 1 9 11 11 9 2 6 48 41. 7% BANKHEAD c. 1 39 54 21 14 3 4 135 68.9% BELL L. 1 22 31 25 14 3 3 98 54 .1% BLACKWELL w. 1 20 28 31 28 2 4 113 42.5% BROWN L. 1 37 17 8 8 5 75 72. 0% BROWN R. 1 55 53 18 15 4 4 149 72. 5% BURGESS R. 1 69 36 4 8 1 2 120 87.5% CARL D. 1 40 46 17 24 7 3 137 62.8% CARR D. 1 30 40 18 15 5 4 112 62.5% CARTER M. 1 23 25 18 20 5 2 93 51.6% POSITION v. 1 2 2 4 .0% CLAYBORN N. 1 41 46 26 22 2 4 141 61. 7% ROBINSON B. 1 47 49 12 4 1 4 117 82.1% DEAN O. 1 48 13 35 6 7 1 110 55.5% LRSD ce DUNBAR INT. L SECONDARY SCHOOL CWS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: STUDIES MAGNET JH - Term: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black DUNN R. 1 9 9 1 1 2 1 23 78.3% FLYNN T. 1 29 40 22 8 3 3 105 65.7% FORNEROD. 1 17 24 16 11 1 4 73 56.2% GAINES s. 1 38 35 27 30 6 3 139 52.5% GARNER G. 1 28 30 18 20 3 2 101 57.4% HARTL. 1 33 28 29 25 2 117 52 .1% HENDERSON E. 1 32 25 33 30 4 5 129 44.2% HOEY M. 1 24 36 26 38 5 2 131 45.8% JACKSON G. 1 29 51 4 26 1 7 118 67.8% JONES F. 1 26 29 31 31 2 3 122 45 .1% JONES T. 1 49 50 15 8 2 3 127 78.0% LOGAN A. 1 40 27 34 37 4 4 146 45.9% MCDONALD T. 1 2 2 4 3 1 12 33.3% MCLEROY C. 1 45 37 8 3 3 5 101 81. 2% DAVIS B. 1 24 4 3 31 90.3% MUNDY s. 1 44 24 11 3 4 6 92 73.9% LRSD . ceDUNBAR SECONDARY SCHOOL C. S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH - Te.rm: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black MURRAY L. 1 7 18 44 39 5 5 118 21.2% NEWTON K. 1 32 38 13 12 3 3 101 69.3% OLDS A. 1 28 27 22 12 3 3 95 57.9% OSHIRO N. 1 39 47 28 20 2 136 63.2% PEACE P. 1 21 31 16 23 2 93 55.9% RICHARDSON w. 1 29 32 36 36 5 5 143 42. 7% RODGERS c. 1 55 43 19 10 5 1 133 73. 7% SANDERS s. 1 35 38 20 14 2 6 115 63.5% SHAVERS G. 1 31 9 3 43 93.0% SIMPSON R. 1 43 39 10 5 3 5 105 78 .1% SKOTKO F. 1 18 30 24 20 6 3 101 47.5% SLAYDEN M. 1 7 11 17 15 3 1 54 33.3% SMITH M. 1 33 35 7 3 3 2 83 81.9% SMITH s. 1 31 37 30 25 4 2 129 52. 7% STANLEY R. 1 11 20 21 21 4 4 81 38.3% TERRY P. 1 17 29 32 46 3 2 129 35. 7% LRSD ~DUNBAR SECONDARY SCHOOL CWS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH - Term: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black UNDERWOOD J. 1 4 4 6 6 20 40.0% WARREN J. 1 24 24 31 29 8 4 120 40.0% WATSON c. 1 27 27 27 25 3 7 116 46.6% WATSON c. 1 28 25 18 25 3 4 103 51.5% WEBB B. 1 27 39 10 21 3 6 106 62.3% WESTERN J. 1 2 8 4 6 20 50.0% WISES. 1 25 31 33 40 3 2 134 41.8% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 4 1 0 0 0 0 5 100.0% Other Health Impaired 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 20 6 5 1 0 0 32 81.3% Speech or Language Impaired 8 1 1 0 0 1 11 81.8% TOTALS 33 8 6 1 0 1 49 83. 7% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 44 62 79 89 8 7 289 36.7% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 07 4 1 5 100. 0% 08 3 1 4 100.0% 09 4 1 1 1 7 71.4% 01 LRSD SECONDARY SUBJECT AREA COURSES FAILED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH Class BM BF WM WF OM OF TM TF % Black ENGLISH 07 13 3 1 14 3 94.1% 08 6 1 4 10 l 63.6% 09 11 10 3 2 14 12 80.8% MATH 07 5 l 1 6 1 85.7% 08 23 6 9 2 1 33 8 70.7% 09 18 5 2 3 1 21 8 79.3% HISTORY/SOC STUDIES 07 7 5 2 9 5 85.7% 08 21 5 5 3 1 27 8 74.3% 09 14 6 1 1 15 7 90.9% SCIENCE 07 13 3 2 1 16 3 84.2% 08 9 2 2 1 12 2 78.6% 09 12 6 1 2 13 8 85.7% 01 LRSD STAFF ASSIGNMENT FOR ADVANCED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 PLACEMENT/HONORS/GIFTED/ENRICHED Secondary Only SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH ACADEMIC AREA BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black English 1 1 2 4 50.0% Math 1 2 3 .0% Science 1 1 1 3 66.7% Social Studies 1 3 4 25.0% Foreign Language .0% TOTAL 3 2 1 8 14 35. 7% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black ESL CLUB 11 14 25 .0% 1 1 .0% CHEERLEADER 4 9 13 30.8% 1 1 100.0% DRILL TEAM 19 19 100.0% 1 1 100.0% PEER MEDIATION 6 12 4 11 1 1 35 51. 4% 2 2 .0% VOLLEYBALL 18 9 27 66.7% 1 1 2 .0% LOVE 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 .0% STUDENT COUNCIL 16 26 6 16 64 65.6% 1 1 2 50.0% FUTURE BOBCATS 5 5 5 5 20 50.0% 1 1 .0% YEARBOOK STAFF 1 5 4 7 1 18 33.3% 1 1 .0% BETA CLUB 11 19 29 42 2 4 107 28.0% 1 1 .0% FBLA 5 14 7 7 33 57.6% 1 1 .0% SPANISH CLUB 4 1 9 14 28.6% 1 1 .0% FOOTBALL 49 7 56 87.5% 3 3 100.0% GIRLS BASKETBALL 24 6 30 80.0% 1 1 2 100.0% GOLF TEAM .0% .0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black LATIN CLUB 2 3 10 6 1 2 24 20.8% 1 1 .0% GIRL'S TRACK .0% .0% BOY'S TRACK .0% .0% SOCCER .0% .0% TENNIS .0% .0% FHA 12 22 1 5 40 85.0% 1 1 100.0% ART CLUB 2 10 17 1 2 32 6.3% 1 1 .0% FRENCH CLUB 5 16 7 12 1 41 51.2% 1 1 .0% PROBLEM SOLVING 1 3 6 2 12 8.3% 1 1 .0% NEWSPAPER 4 4 5 6 1 20 40.0% 1 1 .0% RADIO CLUB 1 1 12 5 1 20 10.0% 1 1 2 50.0% YOUNG DEMOCRAT 2 8 20 1 31 6.5% 1 1 .0% ODYSSEY OF MIND 1 6 10 2 19 5.3% 3 3 .0% MOCK TRIAL 1 2 5 8 12.5% 1 1 .0% MATHLETES 1 8 6 2 3 20 5.0% 1 1 .0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PEER HELPERS 5 14 5 10 1 35 54.3% 2 2 .0% BOYS BASKETBALL 12 2 1 15 80.0% 2 2 100.0% PRIN CABINET .0% 1 1 .0% OUTDOOR ED 8 5 7 3 1 2 26 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% Y-TEENS 17 35 1 53 32 .1% 2 2 .0% FCA 11 10 3 1 1 26 80.8% 1 1 2 50.0% MEN OF DUNBAR 19 19 100.0% 1 1 100.0% TOTAL 176 250 149 276 28 33 912 46.7% 9 6 7 25 47 31. 9% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH HONOR/AWARD HONOR ROLL HONOR ROLL HONOR ROLL PERFECT ATT PERFECT ATT PERFECT ATT CITIZENSHIP CITIZENSHIP CITIZENSHIP REGION CHOIR TOTAL GRADE BM 7 8 9 7 8 9 7 8 9 9 BF WM WF OM 10/29/97 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% PAGE 1 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE LIBRARY ADVISARY P.T.A. BOARD MBR VIPS BM BF 2 2 2 WM WF 1 1 6 OM OF Total % 11 3 Black 36.4% 66.7% .0% BM 1 11 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 5 2 18 WM WF 1 4 4 4 37 OM 1 OF Total % 1 11 7 70 Black 45.5% 42.9% 41. 4% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % TECHNOLOGY COMM SCHOOL IMPROV CO GT COMMITTEE 3 2 2 1 4 1 3 2 1 3 1 3 10 9 7 Black 40.0% 66.7% 42. 9% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 1 2 OF Total % Black 1 100.0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total SCH RECRUITMENT PUPIL SERVICE MAGNET ADVISORY 1 2 1 3 2 1 2 1 2 5 2 5 12 5 % Black 40.0% 41. 7% 40.0% 10/29/97 PAGE 3 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total 2 2 1 5 % Black 40.0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total TOTAL 12 16 12 22 62 % Black 45.2% BM 12 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM 28 7 46 4 OF Total 1 94 % Black 42.6% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 18 2 TESA 29 RACE RELATIONS 11 5 HUMAN RELATIONS 8 2 CULTURAL RELAT. 10 7 EDUC. EQUITY 112 6 TOTAL 188 22 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING ACADEMIC SUPPORT CULT. DIVERSITY TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 24 20 14 6 29 1 94 1 1 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. DOC. OF DISCIP. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: SEC SC I/MATH G/T WORKSHOP SECME LEARNING STYLES VIOLENCE PROVEN SAP FOR LANG ADVSRY TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 10 3 44 26 5 3 86 5 PAGE 1  POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL ASST PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS VOCATIONAL TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST REMDL/COMP MATH RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC ART PE SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FAIR B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 8 5 15 1 2 0 5 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 POSITIONS 7 18 9 26 1 2 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 3 34 8 3 1 1 6 1 2 2 1 63 ll.ll 28.57 14.29 41.27 1.59 3.17 63 % BLACK 100.00 33.33 32.35 62.50 66.67 00 00 16.67 00 50.00 100.00 100.00 39.68 39.68 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS ATTENDANCE CLERK CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK REGISTRAR SECRETARY NURSE SECURITY OFFICER INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FAIR B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 3 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 11 12 0 8 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 35.48 38.71 00 25.81 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 8 7 1 1 3 1 3 6 31 00 31 % BLACK 100.00 62.50 100.00 00 00 00 100.00 100.00 100.00 74.19 74.19 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FAIR B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 18 30 9 34 1 2 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 19.15 31.91 9.57 36.17 1.06 2 .13 94 94 % BLACK 51.06 51.06 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% SP 13 6 4 4 0 0 27 70.4% 10 139 93 29 24 0 2 287 80.8% 11 86 99 13 22 4 0 224 82.6% 12 81 102 16 25 1 1 226 81.0% Total 319 300 62 75 5 3 764 81.0% 41.8% 39.3% 8.1% 9.8% .7% .4% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL el s ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: '4t FAIR HIGH SCHOOL - Term: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black PHILLIPS M. 1 2 2 100.0% ANDERSON s. 1 53 35 8 11 1 1 109 80.7% ARMSTRONG J. 1 44 20 6 3 73 87.7% BEYAH R. 1 25 28 5 7 1 66 80.3% POSITION v. 1 3 3 6 50.0% BOSTIC M. 1 22 37 4 8 3 74 79.7% BOURLAND M. 1 55 46 7 8 1 1 118 85.6% BRAGG A. 1 42 34 9 5 1 2 93 81. 7% BROADNAX w. 1 19 8 27 100. 0% CALLAWAY E. 1 46 48 2 6 1 103 91. 3% POSITION V. 1 3 3 100.0% CLEVELAND K. 1 60 33 11 5 1 110 84.5% BRAGG A. 1 45 38 5 6 1 95 87.4% COOKUS J. 1 43 41 6 7 2 99 84.8% PHILLIPS C. 1 13 7 3 4 27 74.1% DELAMAR C. 1 1 1 1 3 66.7% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: lee FAIR HIGH SCHOOL - - Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black DUNKLIN S. 1 48 25 9 12 94 77. 7% POSITION V. 1 2 2 100.0% EARLEYWINE S. 1 33 37 6 11 3 90 77.8% ENDERLIN E. 1 36 25 7 4 1 73 83.6% ESKOLA G. 1 38 41 6 8 93 84.9% FELDMAN N. 1 46 58 7 8 119 87.4% GLASSCO B. 1 22 3 2 2 29 86.2% GRAY V. 1 31 32 7 6 1 77 81.8% GRUMMER w. 1 20 55 7 26 4 112 67.0% HALL L. 1 54 55 6 9 1 125 87.2% HARRIS L. 1 48 22 9 3 1 83 84.3% HARTNESS P. 1 20 10 5 35 85.7% HASTINGS M. 1 52 38 6 9 1 106 84.9% HEAVIN C. 1 20 37 1 10 68 83.8% POSITION v. 1 3 2 5 100.0% HOBBS P. 1 14 27 11 21 73 56.2% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l - FAIR HIGH SCHOOL - - Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black HULLUM B. 1 49 33 6 6 1 95 86.3% JACKSONS. 1 41 36 6 9 92 83. 7% JACOBS A. 1 57 51 8 10 126 85. 7% JAMELL s. 1 11 7 4 4 26 69.2% JAMES M. 1 31 37 4 8 1 81 84.0% JENNINGS c. 1 17 32 8 15 72 68.1% JOHNSON J. 1 32 22 10 8 1 73 74.0% HARRISON T. 1 36 31 7 5 79 84.8% MACON s. 1 29 80 7 9 125 87.2% MAGEE B. 1 43 44 12 15 1 115 75.7% MAYS S. 1 41 44 4 2 91 93.4% MCAFEE R. 1 29 46 7 13 2 97 77.3% POSITION V. 1 3 5 8 100.0% POSITION v. 1 6 6 100.0% POSITION v. 1 3 3 .0% POSITION V. 1 2 2 100.0% LRSD SECONDARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: l- FAIR HIGH SCHOOL - - Term: ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black POSITION V. 1 12 3 15 80.0% POSITION v. 1 3 3 6 50.0% POSITION v. 1 3 3 100.0% POSITION v. 1 6 6 .0% POSITION v. 1 9 9 100.0% POSITION V. 1 6 3 9 66. 7% POSITION v. 1 3 3 100.0% MOREY D. 1 8 4 3 4 19 63.2% NAHLEN M. 1 27 29 4 10 70 80.0% PALMER R. 1 46 53 11 8 2 1 121 81.8% PICKERING J. 1 24 46 10 17 97 72.2% RAINS M. 1 42 35 10 7 1 95 81.1% RUTHERFORD P. 1 61 39 14 5 119 84.0% WALKER-RI CHAR L. 1 55 49 9 10 1 124 83.9% SCHMITT K. 1 36 32 9 15 92 73.9% POSITION V. 1 10 10 100.0% LRSD e FAIR HIGH SCHOOL SECONDARY SCHOOL C. S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29i School: Term: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black POSITION v. 1 7 22 4 9 42 69.0% STEELE M. 1 5 5 15 5 30 33.3% POSITION V. 1 2 2 100.0% TAYLOR T. 1 21 20 1 1 43 95.3% THOMPSON P. 1 29 33 6 7 75 82.7% WAGE M. 1 54 54 8 10 1 1 128 84.4% WALKER s. 1 15 5 10 30 66.7% WILDER R. 1 30 37 10 11 4 92 72. 8% WILLIAMS M. 1 45 43 5 6 99 88.9% WILLIS L. 1 40 21 7 8 1 2 79 77.2% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Autism 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Hearing Impaired 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Mentally Retarded 7 7 1 2 0 0 17 82.4% Multihandicapped 1 0 1 1 0 0 3 33.3% Orthopedically Handicapped 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 .0% Other Health Impaired 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 50.0% Seriously Emotionally Disturbe 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 .0% Specific Learning Disability 21 6 6 3 0 0 36 75.0% Speech or Language Impaired 14 5 3 3 0 0 25 76.0% Visually Handicapped 1 2 1 1 0 0 5 60.0% TOTALS 47 21 15 11 0 0 94 72.3% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 30 65 14 13 1 0 123 77. 2% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF 10 11 12 8 8 2 2 1 WM WF 1 2 OM OF Total Count Black 13 76.9% 10 100.0% 1 100.0% QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STUDENT GRADUATION DATA LAST YEAR 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: FAIR HIGH SCHOOL BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 66 71 31 26 1 3 198 69.2% 01 LRSD SECONDARY SUBJECT AREA COURSES FAILED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF TM TF % Black ENGLISH 10 34 21 4 2 38 23 90.2% 11 12 5 4 1 1 17 6 73.9% 12 7 3 7 3 100.0% MATH 10 34 23 4 3 38 26 89 .1% 11 30 29 4 4 1 35 33 86.8% 12 15 10 1 15 11 96.2% HISTORY/SOC STUDIES 10 28 11 3 2 31 13 88.6% 11 21 9 1 2 22 11 90.9% 12 3 1 1 4 1 80.0% SCIENCE 10 13 7 3 2 16 9 80.0% 11 9 5 2 9 7 87.5% 12 4 3 1 4 4 87.5% 01 LRSD SCHOOL: STAFF ASSIGNMENT FOR ADVANCED PLACEMENT/HONORS/GIFTED/ENRICHED Secondary Only 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL ACADEMIC AREA BM BF WM WF OM English 3 Math 2 Science 1 3 Social Studies 1 1 Foreign Language 1 TOTAL 2 2 8 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OF Total % Black 3 .0% 2 .0% 4 25.0% 2 50.0% 1 .0% 12 16.7% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Band 20 18 1 39 97.4% 1 1 100. 0% Baseball 5 21 26 19.2% 1 1 .0% Basketball, Boys 47 1 48 97.9% 2 2 100.0% Basketball, Girl 15 5 20 75 .0% 1 1 2 50.0% CCE 13 13 1 27 96.3% 1 1 100.0% Cheerleaders 6 10 16 37.5% 1 1 100.0% Choir 8 37 1 7 53 84.9% 1 1 .0% Beta Club 4 22 3 11 40 65.0% 2 2 .0% Career Awareness 10 26 2 6 44 81.8% 2 2 .0% DECA 9 26 2 3 40 87.5% 1 1 100. 0% Drama Club 10 18 4 8 40 70.0% 1 1 100.0% Drill Team 20 20 100.0% 1 1 .0% FBLA 37 51 3 8 3 1 103 85.4% 1 2 1 4 25.0% French Club 5 8 3 3 19 68.4% 1 1 .0% Football 50 2 52 96.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Gentlemen's Club 25 6 31 80.6% 1 1 100.0% Golf 2 4 6 .0% 1 1 .0% WOW Sr \u0026amp; Parents 25 37 8 10 1 81 76.5% 1 1 100.0% Journalism 2 4 7 10 23 26.1% 1 1 .0% Ring Staff-Jr 4 13 3 4 1 25 68.0% 1 1 .0% Ladies' Club 35 5 40 87.5% 3 3 100.0% Mu Alpha Theta 3 8 4 2 17 64.7% 1 1 .0% National Honor 10 19 7 9 1 46 63.0% 2 2 .0% Peer Counseling 9 22 5 9 45 68.9% 1 1 100.0% S.E.C.M.E. 17 22 1 5 45 86. 7% 1 1 100.0% Safety Council 6 5 2 2 15 73.3% 1 1 100.0% SAP 49 41 10 13 113 79.6% 1 1 .0% Spanish Club 7 24 2 17 2 1 53 58.5% 2 2 .0% Student Council 6 15 1 4 26 80.8% 1 1 .0% Teach. Tomorrow 13 1 14 92. 9% 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Teens For Christ 1 3 36 40 2.5% 1 1 .0% Tennis 1 1 3 3 1 9 22.2% 1 1 .0% Track, Boys 24 24 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Track, Girls 22 22 100.0% 1 1 100.0% Volleyball 13 2 15 86. 7% 1 1 .0% Y-Teens 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 .0% Fell. Chr. Ath. 18 1 1 20 90.0% 1 1 .0% BCC 1 1 2 4 8 25.0% 1 1 100.0% COE 2 12 1 6 1 22 63.6% 1 1 .0% Art Club 5 4 5 3 17 52.9% 1 1 100.0% TOTAL 432 574 115 217 8 5 1351 74.5% 12 13 14 17 56 44.6% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black BIRACIAL COMMITT 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 1 4 50.0% P.T.A. BOARD MBR 1 1 100.0% 1 3 4 25.0% VIPS 1 1 100.0% 1 1 .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Business Advisor 1 2 1 4 25.0% 1 2 3 3 9 33.3% CCE Advisory 1 1 100.0% 7 2 4 13 69.2% BCC 1 1 2 4 8 25.0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Clear Sch Purpos 1 5 2 5 13 46.2% Discipline 1 1 2 4 8 25.0% Parent/Comm 1 2 2 5 10 30.0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 3 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM Student Ach Time on Task Marketing BF 2 3 4 1 WM 1 2 WF 4 5 OM OF Total % 10 11 Black 50.0% 36.4% 1 100.0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 1 1 1 4 OF Total % 3 Black .0% .0% 66.7% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF TOTAL 6 22 13 29 OM OF Total % Black 70 40.0% BM 10/29/97 PAGE 5 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 9 8 9 8 34 50.0% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 12 2 TESA 13 RACE RELATIONS 8 5 HUMAN RELATIONS CULTURAL RELAT. 10 17 TOTAL 43 24 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING ACADEMIC SUPPORT TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 24 11 9 25 1 69 1 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 22 26 48 15 15 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: Learn Strategies Viol Prevention GT Learn Styles TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 2 3 1 25 31 36 1 37 PAGE 1 FAIR PARK  POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST REMDL/COMP READING GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER MUSIC SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FAIR PARK B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 POSITIONS 2 7 1 10 0 0 10.00 35.00 5.00 50.00 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 13 1 1 1 1 1 1 20 00 20 % BLACK 100.00 38.46 00 100.00 00 100.00 00 100.00 45.00 45.00 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FAIR PARK B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 3 7 0 6 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 18.75 43.75 00 37.50 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 3 2 1 1 1 5 3 16 00 16 % BLACK 66.67 100.00 100.00 00 00 60.00 66.67 62.50 62.50 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FAIR PARK B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 5 14 1 16 13.89 38.89 2.78 44.44 0 .oo 0 .oo 36 36 % BLACK 52.78 52.78 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 15 17 3 3 0 0 38 84.2% P4 5 12 4 12 0 3 36 47.2% SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 01 11 24 4 5 1 0 45 77.8% 02 13 12 2 1 2 1 31 80.6% 03 18 11 4 1 0 0 34 85.3% 04 7 8 3 1 0 0 19 78.9% 05 8 9 2 4 0 0 23 73.9% 06 7 14 1 2 2 1 27 77.8% Total 84 107 23 29 5 5 253 75.5% 33.2% 42.3% 9.1% 11.5% 2.0% 2.0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black POWELL R. 1 1 1 .0% K BROWN R. 1 7 9 1 2 19 84.2% K LEWIS L. 1 7 8 2 1 18 83.3% P4 COTHRAN D. 1 2 6 2 6 2 18 44.4% P4 PUSCH L. 1 3 6 2 6 1 18 50.0% 01 DELOZIER M. 1 6 12 2 1 1 22 81. 8% 01 POWELL R. 1 5 12 2 3 22 77.3% 02 CORBIN B. 1 5 3 1 9 88.9% 02 JAMES C. 1 1 1 100.0% 02 RICE O. 1 7 9 2 1 2 21 76.2% 03 CORBIN B. 1 5 4 9 100.0% 03 TURNER M. 1 13 7 4 1 25 80.0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Teacher 04 05 06 JAMES C. SHERWOOD S. CARTER C. BM ******TEACHER****** BF WM WF OM OF SP 1 1 1 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 7 8 3 1 19 78.9% 8 9 2 3 22 77.3% 7 14 1 2 2 1 27 77.8% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Mentally Retarded 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 100.0% Orthopedically Handicapped 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 .0% Specific Learning Disability 3 0 0 0 1 0 4 75.0% Speech or Language Impaired 1 2 1 0 1 0 5 60.0% TOTALS 6 2 2 0 2 0 12 66.7% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 6 9 4 4 0 0 23 65.2% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM K 01 02 03 3 BF 2 1 WM WF OM OF Total % 1 Count Black 3 100.0% 2 100.0% 1 . 0% 1 100.0% QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Just Say No .0% 1 1 2 50.0% Fire Marshal ls .0% .0% Student Council .0% 1 1 100.0% Peer Helpers .0% .0% Preschool Helper .0% .0% BASKETBALL 13 2 1 16 81.3% 2 2 100.0% CHEERLEADERS 10 2 12 83.3% 1 1 100. 0% AMBASSADORS 7 7 3 4 1 22 63.6% 1 1 .0% RECORDER GROUP 13 13 2 2 1 31 83.9% 1 1 100.0% CAMBIATA SINGERS 4 14 3 4 25 72 .0% .0% TOTAL 47 34 10 12 3 106 76.4% 3 3 2 8 75.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF \"A\"HONOR ROL \"B\"HONOR ROL \"AB\" HONOR CITIZENSHIP STU OF MONTH 4 5 3 TOTAL 4 5 3 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% 1 13 69.2% 1 13 69.2% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BIRACIAL COMMITT P.T.A. BOARD MBR VIPS BM 1 1 BF 1 WM WF 2 2 OM OF Total % 3 4 Black 33.3% 50.0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE 1 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF 1 1 3 WM WF 1 1 1 3 OM OF Total % 4 7 Black 50.0% 42.9% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE PARENT WORKSHOPS SCHOOL IMPROV CO Teacher Morale BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE 2 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Student Handbook Science Fair Field Day BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 3 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Halloween Carniv Intl. Bazaar Grant Writing BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 4 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Sunshine Com. PIE BCC BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 5 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .oi 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Discipline Student Council Journalism Newsp BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 6 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE Pupil Serv. Team Guidance TOTAL BM BF 2 WM WF OM 1 4 OF Total 7 % Black .0% .0% 42.9% BM 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM 1 4 2 4 7 OF Total 11 % Black .0% .0% 45.5% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PREJUDICE REDUC. TESA RACE RELATIONS HUMAN RELATIONS CULTURAL RELAT. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING ACADEMIC SUPPORT TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP. CLASSROOM MGMT. TOTAL PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: Whole Language Multi Curriculum Computer Windows On Scien Reading RECOVERY K-4 CRUSADE TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1 6 7 PAGE 1\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1142","title":"Little Rock School District, school profiles","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1997-10-29"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Forest Park Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Forest Heights Junior High School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Franklin Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Fulbright Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School employees","School improvement programs","School integration","Student assistance programs","Students"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District, school profiles"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1142"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nForest Park Elementary, Forest Heights Elementary, Franklin Elementary, Fullbright Elementary\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nFOREST PARK  POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST REMDL/COMP READING GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER SPEECH THERAPIST MUSIC SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FOREST PARK B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 13 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 POSITIONS 1 9 0 19 0 0 3.45 31.03 00 65.52 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 20 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 29 00 29 % BLACK 100.00 35.00 100.00 00 100.00 00 00 00 00 34.48 34.48 POSITION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FOREST PARK B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL % BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER 0 1 0 2 0 0 3 33.33 CUSTODIANS 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 100.00 MEDIA CLERK 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 SECRETARY 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 NURSE 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES 0 2 0 1 0 0 3 66.67 SUPERVISION AIDES 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 100.00 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 4 6 0 6 0 0 16 62.50 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 25.00 37.50 00 37.50 00 00 16 62.50 POSITION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FOREST PARK B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL % BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL PERCENT 5 15 11.11 33.33 0 25 .00 55.56 0 .oo 0 .00 45 45 44.44 44.44 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 12 15 17 11 2 0 57 47.4% SP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 01 14 14 18 16 0 0 62 45.2% 02 14 18 23 17 0 1 73 43.8% 03 16 12 17 19 0 0 64 43.8% 04 11 18 16 19 0 1 65 44.6% 05 14 12 11 17 0 1 55 47.3% 06 15 19 11 10 1 0 56 60.7% Total 96 108 113 109 3 3 432 47.2% 22.2% 25.0% 26.2% 25.2% .7% .7% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K COLLINS c. 1 4 6 7 3 20 50.0% K MOORE C. 1 5 2 5 5 2 19 36.8% K SIGNAIGO c. 1 3 7 5 3 18 55.6% 01 WENGER C. 1 6 5 6 5 22 50.0% 01 WESTBROOK P. 1 3 4 5 6 18 38.9% 01 WHITE-ERWIN P. 1 5 5 7 5 22 45.5% 02 BAUMAN S. 1 5 7 8 5 25 48.0% 02 GWIN L. 1 4 7 8 6 25 44.0% 02 MACHEN J. 1 5 4 7 6 1 23 39.1% 03 GESTAUT H. 1 5 3 5 8 21 38 .1% 03 PENNY J. 1 5 5 6 5 21 47.6% 03 TURNER A. 1 6 4 6 6 22 45.5% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 04 CLEMENTS c. 1 5 4 4 7 20 45.0% 04 GIUSTI D. 1 3 8 5 7 23 47.8% 04 MARTIN M. 1 3 6 6 5 1 21 42.9% 04 WESTBROOK P. 1 1 1 .0% 05 TALLEY T. 1 7 5 7 7 1 27 44.4% 05 WILSON G. 1 7 7 4 10 28 50.0% 06 BALLARD J. 1 7 10 6 5 28 60.7% 06 LEMLE N. 1 8 9 5 5 1 28 60.7% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Other Health Impaired 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Speech or Language Impaired 4 3 2 3 0 0 12 58.3% TOTALS 5 4 2 3 0 0 14 64.3% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 12 20 43 50 0 2 127 25.2% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM K 01 02 1 1 2 BF WM WF 2 2 2 1 OM OF Total % Count Black 3 100.0% 3 100.0% 5 80.0% QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black STUDENT COUNCIL 5 8 8 11 1 33 39.4% 2 2 4 50.0% STU.COUN.OFFICER 1 1 2 3 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% JUST SAY NO 10 10 10 10 1 41 48.8% 2 1 3 66.7% PEER TUTORS 6 6 6 6 2 26 46.2% 1 1 100.0% MOTIVATORS 8 12 20 40.0% 2 2 100.0% TOTAL 22 33 26 42 3 1 127 43.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black BIRACIAL COMMITT 1 1 .0% 1 1 1 1 4 50.0% P.T.A. BOARD MBR 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 8 25.0% VIPS 1 2 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black PARENT WORKSHOPS 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% SCHOOL IMPROV CO 5 10 20 35 42.9% 1 1 1 1 4 50.0% TOTAL 6 16 28 50 44.0% 3 7 4 10 24 41. 7% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 22 1 11 TESA 8 RACE RELATIONS 22 1 11 HUMAN RELATIONS 22 1 11 CULTURAL RELAT. 19 1 6 abacus 17 corr.ofeffec.sch 8 corp.lerng. 15 ann.sch.imp pln. 29 desegreg. 9 coe 26 27 9 at risk students 19 wind. on science 20 4 2 classroom mgt. 22 hands on math. 26 6 TOTAL 284 41 50 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: PET CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2 CYCLE 3 COOP. LEARNING ACADEMIC SUPPORT TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 21 16 3 2 10 25 27 2 2 77 27 2 2 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 15 22 1 37 1 PAGE 1 FOREST HEIGHTS LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT QUIZ:SSPLST STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FOREST HEIGHTS POSITION B L A C K W H I T E 0 T H E R TOTAL % M F M F M F BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 ASST PRINCIPAL 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 5 9 4 13 0 0 31 45.16 VOCATIONAL TEACHERS 1 1 0 3 0 0 5 40.00 COUNSELOR 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 MEDIA SPECIALIST 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 00 REMDL/COMP READING 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 REMDL/COMP MATH 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 RESOURCE/TEACHER 0 3 1 2 0 0 6 50.00 SPEECH THERAPIST 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.00 MUSIC 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 100. 00 ART 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 00 PE 0 1 1 2 0 0 4 25.00 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 9 19 7 26 0 0 61 45.90 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 14.75 31.15 11.48 42.62 00 00 61 45.90 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS ATTENDANCE CLERK CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK REGISTRAR SECRETARY NURSE SECURITY OFFICER INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FOREST HEIGHTS B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 5 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 1 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 7 7 1 10 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 28.00 28.00 4.00 40.00 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 7 5 1 1 1 1 2 6 25 00 25 % BLACK 00 28.57 100.00 00 00 100.00 00 100.00 66.67 56.00 56.00 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FOREST HEIGHTS B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 16 26 8 36 18.60 30.23 9.30 41.86 0 .oo 0 .oo 86 86 % BLACK 48.84 48.84 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent SP 9 3 3 1 0 0 16 75.0% 07 77 69 32 34 3 7 222 65.8% 08 67 82 37 20 4 0 210 71.0% 09 83 75 28 26 3 1 216 73 .1% Total 236 229 100 81 10 8 664 70.0% 35.5% 34.5% 15.1% 12.2% 1.5% 1.2% LRSD 0- FOREST HEIGHTS SECONDARY SCHOOL C. S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: JR HIGH SCHOOL - Term: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black ALLEN F. 1 42 31 11 14 1 4 103 70.9% BAILEY R. 1 48 40 17 17 122 72 .1% BASS M. 1 32 38 21 18 1 3 113 61. 9% BEGGS M. 1 48 36 10 14 3 111 75. 7% BIRGE A. 1 44 34 10 14 2 104 75.0% BRADSHER P. 1 29 29 10 6 74 78.4% BRISCOE III J. 1 45 34 10 15 2 106 74.5% BROWN A. 1 17 19 15 16 2 5 74 48.6% CARR P. 1 36 31 15 11 1 2 96 69.8% COBBS M. 1 30 15 5 2 1 53 84.9% COLE L. 1 35 41 17 11 1 1 106 71.7% CROMEDY v. 1 35 37 15 10 3 100 72.0% CROSS N. 1 29 34 20 19 1 3 106 59.4% DAVIS 8. 1 17 11 4 3 35 80.0% PETERSON K. 1 17 17 100.0% DUNCAN E. 1 51 32 11 12 3 1 110 75.5% LRSD 0-FOREST SECONDARY SCHOOL C.S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29~ School: HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL Term: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black DUNLAP D. 1 41 23 18 15 2 1 100 64.0% POSITION v. 1 9 1 10 90.0% FORE L. 1 28 36 16 12 1 93 68.8% GREEN II T. 1 49 57 36 18 1 161 65.8% HAMMAKER c. 1 42 32 11 14 1 4 104 71.2% HOLLOWAY G. 1 34 36 20 18 1 3 112 62.5% JOHNSON v. 1 32 49 9 15 105 77.1% JOHNSON T. 1 31 40 18 7 3 99 71. 7% JONES S. 1 40 44 17 12 1 1 115 73.0% KIDD L. 1 15 4 2 21 90.5% KIRCHNER L. 1 34 42 19 8 3 106 71. 7% BRUCE-LIPKINS E. 1 13 8 3 2 26 80.8% MAGEE M. 1 33 41 19 8 3 104 71.2% MAYS A. 1 36 42 19 7 3 107 72.9% MCCREE G. 1 37 30 11 14 1 4 97 69 .1% MCFADDEN S. 1 42 37 12 10 3 1 105 75.2% LRSD O. OREST SECONDARY SCHOOL C. S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL - Term: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black MUELLER C. 1 11 18 6 4 39 74.4% NUNIS H. 1 33 39 18 12 1 103 69.9% PIKE L. 1 31 37 21 18 1 3 111 61. 3% POOLE T. 1 35 40 18 12 1 106 70.8% POTURALSKI E. 1 12 5 1 18 66.7% PRICE L. 1 33 39 18 12 1 103 69.9% ROBERTS c. 1 40 42 18 11 1 1 113 72.6% RUNDELL M. 1 16 18 10 7 2 53 64.2% SHERBETT K. 1 34 34 11 11 4 94 72. 3% SMITH JR v. 1 280 246 107 80 11 8 732 71. 9% POSITION v. 1 40 43 18 11 1 1 114 72.8% TAYLOR C. 1 23 19 5 3 1 51 82.4% THOMASON M. 1 27 16 8 8 1 60 71. 7% THOMAS M. 1 45 34 10 15 2 106 74.5% TODD L. 1 19 30 17 16 1 1 84 58.3% WALKER Y. 1 27 40 18 7 3 95 70.5% LRSD 0-FOREST HEIGHTS SECONDARY SCHOOL C.S ENROLLMENT SECCLS 10/29/97 School: JR HIGH SCHOOL - Term: 1 ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black WILLIAMS K. 1 33 41 18 12 1 105 70.5% WILLIAMS G. 1 31 38 21 18 1 3 112 61. 6% WILLIAMS N. 1 25 10 10 5 5 55 63.6% ZAKRZEWSKI M. 1 43 36 10 14 1 4 108 73 .1% ZIMMERMAN D. 1 43 31 11 14 1 4 104 71. 2% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Hearing Impaired 1 2 1 0 0 0 4 75.0% Mentally Retarded 10 8 2 1 0 0 21 85.7% Multihandicapped 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 100.0% Orthopedically Handicapped 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Seriously Emotionally Disturbe 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Specific Learning Disability 19 7 5 0 1 0 32 81. 3% Speech or Language Impaired 12 6 6 4 0 0 28 64.3% Traumatic Brain Injury 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 50.0% Visually Handicapped 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% TOTALS 44 28 14 6 1 0 93 77.4% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 30 37 27 26 1 1 122 54.9% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 07 6 1 1 8 75.0% 08 2 1 2 5 60.0% 09 1 2 1 1 5 60.0% 01 LRSD SECONDARY SUBJECT AREA COURSES FAILED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF TM TF % Black ENGLISH 07 15 6 2 2 1 18 8 80.8% 08 15 4 2 1 17 5 86.4% 09 5 8 2 7 8 86.7% MATH 07 10 3 10 3 100.0% 08 15 9 1 1 16 10 92.3% 09 16 11 2 1 1 19 12 87 .1% HISTORY/SOC STUDIES 07 21 8 1 1 1 23 9 90.6% 08 13 4 13 4 100.0% 09 15 6 2 1 1 18 7 84.0% SCIENCE 07 19 5 1 1 20 6 92.3% 08 7 2 1 1 8 3 81. 8% 09 26 19 4 1 1 31 20 88.2% 01 LRSD STAFF ASSIGNMENT FOR ADVANCED 10/29/97 PAGE 1 PLACEMENT/HONORS/GIFTED/ENRICHED Secondary Only SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL ACADEMIC AREA BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black English 35 58 40 38 2 2 175 53 .1% Math 30 34 36 30 4 2 136 47 .1% Science 28 51 41 32 2 1 155 51.0% Social Studies 32 35 28 49 3 1 148 45.3% Foreign Language .0% TOTAL 125 178 145 149 11 6 614 49.3% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black FBLA 4 13 3 6 26 65.4% 3 3 .0% FOOTBALL 26 9 35 74.3% 1 2 3 33.3% FRENCH CLUB 5 8 6 8 1 28 46.4% 1 1 .0% FUTURE HOME MK 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% GOLF .0% 1 1 .0% NAT. JR. HONOR 3 7 3 3 1 17 58.8% 2 2 .0% PEER FACILATORS .0% 1 1 2 50.0% SPANISH CLUB 13 17 10 10 1 1 52 57.7% 1 1 .0% STUDENT COUNCIL .0% 1 1 2 50.0% BASKETBALL ( B) .0% 1 1 2 100.0% BASKETBALL ( G) .0% 2 2 100.0% BETA CLUB 8 22 9 6 3 48 62.5% 2 2 .0% CARE CLUB .0% 1 1 2 50.0% CHEERLEADERS 6 5 1 12 50.0% 1 1 100.0% DRILL TEAM 15 15 100.0% 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black SOCCER .0% 1 1 100.0% TRACK ( B) 17 17 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0% TRACK ( G) 22 3 25 88.0% 2 2 100.0% VOLLEYBALL 20 9 1 30 66.7% 1 1 100.0% Y-TEENS 13 8 21 61. 9% 1 1 .0% CHOIR 19 37 5 12 73 76.7% 1 1 100.0% ADV. BAND 7 5 1 1 1 15 80.0% 1 1 100.0% INT. BAND 14 9 3 1 1 28 82 .1% 1 1 100.0% BEG. BAND 20 8 2 4 2 36 77.8% 1 1 100.0% FCLA 15 29 8 12 64 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% YEARBOOK STAFF 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% CHESS CLUB 4 2 2 8 50.0% 1 1 .0% SAP 1 8 11 20 45.0% 1 1 .0% TOTAL 156 245 63 102 9 4 579 69.3% 8 15 5 17 45 51. 1% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black HONOR ROLL-A 0 3 2 3 8 62.5% HONOR ROLL-A 0 1 1 2 4 50.0% HONOR ROLL-A 0 1 4 2 1 8 12.5% HONOR ROLL-B 09 4 18 5 13 2 42 52.4% HONOR ROLL-B 08 6 26 5 7 3 1 48 66.7% HONOR ROLL-B 07 8 16 17 4 1 46 52.2% TOTAL 22 64 33 29 4 4 156 55.1% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BIRACIAL COMMITT PTA VIPS BM 1 BF WM WF 1 1 1 1 1 OM OF Total % 4 1 Black 50.0% .0% 1 100.0% BM 1 1 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM 1 2 1 WF 2 1 1 OM 1 OF Total % 4 4 2 Black 50.0% 75.0% 50.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black ADMINSTATIVE COM 5 2 1 8 87.5% POTLUCK COMMITT 1 3 2 6 66.7% STEERING COMMIT. 1 3 1 5 10 40.0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 2 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE ASSEMBLY COMMITT PUPIL SERVICES S.A.P. BM 1 2 BF 1 3 WM WF 4 2 OM OF Total % Black 2 100.0% 9 2 55.6% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 3 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black MENTORS COMMUNICATIONS RECRUITMENT 1 1 5 5 1 100.0% 5 . 0% 6 16.7% 10/29/97 PAGE 4 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total TECHNOLOGY COMM. DISCIPLINE SUNSHINE COMM. 3 1 3 2 1 1 3 2 4 5 9 6 % Black .0% 66.7% 16.7% 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM 5 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 6 SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black TOTAL 16 18 8 33 75 45.3% 2 4 4 10 60.0% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 32 TESA 32 45 RACE RELATIONS 29 1 1 HUMAN RELATIONS 32 2 2 CULTURAL RELAT. 25 2 1 EQTY MONITORING 7 SPECIAL ED MODIF 1 22 COE 55 58 MAGNET ARTS SCH 1 1 ATTENDANCE SEC 1 PARAPROF TRNG 1 MASTER SCDL-REG 1 SAFETY \u0026amp; SECURTY 1 TOTAL 206 137 7 3 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PET 24 CYCLE 1 29 CYCLE 2 15 CYCLE 3 9 COOP. LEARNING 46 ACADEMIC SUPPORT 41 LEARNING STRAT. so MODIF. INSTRUCT. 6 3 3 STUDENTS AT RISK 4 58 TOTAL 174 108 3 3 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 ASSERTIVE DISCIP 43 3 CLASSROOM MGMT. 41 4 INTEG. ACAD. CLS 3 SECURITY INSERV AVOID\\FAIL. BEH. TOTAL 84 10 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 2 2 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 SAFETY \u0026amp; SECURIT 2 2 MIDDLE SCHL LDSP 4 PEER HELP RETREA 2 CAREER ED. PLANG 1 SAP TRAINING 5 2 1 READING RENAISSA 2 ADD INS.-SPEC.ED 6 ANN REVW-SPEC.ED 4 COACHES MEETING 5 FAMILY MATH\u0026amp;SCI 4 GIFTED WORKSHOP 1 ALTERNATIVE EDUC 1 OASIS RENEWAL 6 COACHING CLINIC 2 CHECK IN TRAINNG 1 STANFORD 9 55 57 TITLE I CMPTR 2 FOOTBALL COACHES 3 HEALTH \u0026amp; PHYS ED 2 1 LRNG FNDTNS-DM TURNING POINTS 58 1 TEACHING TIPS 55 LIB. AUTOMATION 1 INFO. BYTE WORD TOTAL 76 206 4 FRANKLIN  LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT QUIZ:SSPLST STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FRANKLIN POSITION B L A C K W H I T E OTHER TOTAL % M F M F M F BLACK -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 ASST PRINCIPAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 CLASSROOM TEACHERS 3 11 0 14 0 0 28 50.00 COUNSELOR 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 MEDIA SPECIALIST 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 REMDL/COMP READING 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 REMDL/COMP MATH 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 GIFTED/TALENTED 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 RESOURCE/TEACHER 0 2 0 2 0 0 4 50.00 MUSIC 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 ART 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 00 AUXILIARY TEACHER 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.00 SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED POSITIONS 3 18 0 21 0 0 42 50.00 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 7.14 42.86 00 50.00 00 00 42 50.00 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS ATTENDANCE CLERK CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK NURSE SOCIAL WORKER INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FRANKLIN B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 18 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 6 31 1 1 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 15.38 79.49 2.56 2.56 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 6 4 1 1 1 23 2 39 00 39 % BLACK 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 00 100.00 95.65 100. 00 94.87 94.87 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FRANKLIN B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL M F M F M F 9 49 1 22 11.11 60.49 1.23 27.16 0 .oo 0 .00 81 81 % BLACK 71.60 71.60 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 32 39 2 1 1 0 75 94.7% P4 22 34 6 4 2 3 71 78.9% SP 11 4 2 1 0 0 18 83.3% 01 30 31 0 2 0 2 65 93.8% 02 30 27 1 2 1 0 61 93.4% 03 28 25 1 0 0 0 54 98 .1% 04 23 19 2 0 1 1 46 91. 3% 05 13 19 0 1 0 0 33 97.0% 06 12 24 0 0 0 2 38 94. 7% Total 201 222 14 11 5 8 461 91.8% 43.6% 48.2% 3.0% 2.4% 1.1% 1.7% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K BROOKS-TURNER K. 1 6 13 19 100.0% K BUTLER B. 1 8 9 2 19 89.5% K HOLLEY M. 1 9 9 1 19 94.7% K JACKSON s. 1 9 8 1 18 94.4% P4 BUCK J. 1 5 7 2 1 1 1 17 70.6% P4 MCNULTY L. 1 4 10 3 1 18 77.8% P4 PARISH P. 1 4 11 1 1 1 18 83.3% P4 WINSTON J. 1 9 6 1 1 1 18 83.3% 01 JENKINS T. 1 7 8 1 1 17 88.2% 01 MYRICK A. 1 6 8 1 15 93.3% 01 SIMPSON C. 1 10 7 17 100.0% 01 WATSON M. 1 1 1 .0% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 02 ARNETT M. 1 4 8 1 13 92.3% 02 CAMPBELL S. 1 9 3 1 1 1 15 80.0% 02 JENKINS T. 1 1 1 100.0% 02 SNELLING N. 1 9 7 16 100.0% 02 WASHINGTON P. 1 8 8 16 100.0% 03 MULLINS T. 1 8 10 18 100.0% 03 STUBBLEFIELD G. 1 7 9 1 17 94 .1% 03 WIMBERLY J. 1 13 6 19 100.0% 04 ACOTT M. 1 6 7 1 14 92.9% 04 GADDY E. 1 8 7 1 1 17 88.2% 04 JORDAN D. 1 3 3 100.0% 04 KINARD L. 1 9 5 1 15 93.3% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 05 JACKSON JR J. 1 5 9 14 100.0% 05 JORDAN D. 1 2 1 3 100.0% 05 MCMURRAY K. 1 8 10 1 19 94.7% 06 DILLARD C. 1 5 13 1 19 94.7% 06 GILES A. 1 7 11 1 19 94.7% 06 JORDAN D. 1 2 3 5 100.0% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Autism 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 .0% Mentally Retarded 8 4 0 0 0 0 12 100.0% Orthopedically Handicapped 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100. 0% Specific Learning Disability 3 2 0 0 0 0 5 100.0% Speech or Language Impaired 14 9 1 0 0 0 24 95.8% Traumatic Brain Injury 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% TOTALS 26 16 2 0 0 0 44 95.5% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 9 20 3 1 0 1 34 85.3% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 2 1 1 4 75.0% 01 1 1 100.0% 02 2 2 100.0% 06 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black ACADEMIC GAMES BROWNIES CUB SCOUTS GIRLS SCOUTS MATH MANIPULATIV SEWING NEEDLEWOR SC !ENCE CLUB TOTAL .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% 10/29/97 PAGE ADULT SPONSORS BM BF WM WF OM 1 OF Total % Black .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black A's 01 6 14 1 1 1 23 87.0% A's 02 4 7 11 100.0% A's 03 3 5 1 9 88.9% A's 04 1 1 100.0% A's 05 .0% A's 06 1 1 100.0% A\u0026amp;B 01 6 3 9 100.0% A\u0026amp;B 02 9 9 18 100.0% A\u0026amp;B 03 7 2 1 10 90.0% A\u0026amp;B 04 2 2 100.0% A\u0026amp;B 05 1 4 5 100.0% A\u0026amp;B 06 3 4 7 100.0% B's 01 1 1 100.0% B's 02 .0% B's 03 2 2 4 100.0% B's 05 1 1 100.0% B's 06 .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOLWIDE STUDENT HONORS/AWARDS 10/29/97 PAGE 2 (FIRST SEMESTER) SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HONOR/AWARD GRADE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Most Improve 01 4 4 100.0% Most Improve 02 1 2 3 100.0% Most Improve 03 1 2 3 100.0% Most Improve 04 2 2 100.0% Most Improve 05 1 1 100.0% Most Improve 06 1 1 100.0% Citizenship 01 5 8 1 1 15 86.7% Citizenship 02 9 17 26 100.0% Citizenship 03 9 11 1 1 22 90.9% Citizenship 04 3 3 100.0% Citizenship 05 1 3 2 6 66.7% Citizenship 06 3 6 9 100.0% TOTAL 75 111 5 2 2 2 197 94.4% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black STUDENT COUNCIL 5 1 6 83.3% 1 2 1 4 75.0% P.T.A. BOARD MBR 1 1 2 100.0% 6 1 7 85.7% READING COMMITTE 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 100.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % FIELD DAY COMMIT PARENT INVOLVEME SCIENCE FAIR 1 1 3 6 1 1 2 1 Black 4 100.0% 8 4 75.0% 50.0% BM 1 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 2 1 1 WM WF OM 2 OF Total % Black 2 100.0% 1 100.0% 2 100.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black AUTHOR CONFERENC 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 100.0% SUNSHINE COMMITT 2 1 2 5 40.0% 1 1 100.0% PUBLIC AWARENESS 4 1 5 80.0% 2 2 100.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BEHAVIOR MANAGEM SPIRIT COMMITTEE VIPS COMMITTEE 3 3 2 1 3 2 4 7 5 6 Black 42.9% 60.0% 33.3% BM 10/29/97 PAGE 4 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF 2 OM OF Total % Black .0% 2 100.0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black TOTAL 3 35 3 24 65 58.5% 10/29/97 PAGE 5 PARENTS/PATRONS BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black 2 20 1 1 24 91. 7% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 PARENT COUNC SOP 33 6 MULTIPLE INTELLI 33 22 TEACHING COMPUTE 36 6 GREAT EXPECTATIO 23 10 PHONIC READING 11 ABACUS 33 6 ACCELETR READER 7 SHURLEY METHOD 13 22 COE MATHPULATIVE 26 4 EXTD COMPRENSIVE 33 5 READING LA INSTR 2 THEMATIC UNIT 33 6 OPEN COURT 32 17 13 AETN 21 8 INCENTI SCH PLAN 27 READING STRAGEGI 19 TEAM BULIDING 45 PRINCIPAL INSTIT 1 SOC STUD TEXTBOO 19 READING PROGRAM 19 INTERNATI READIN 4 SUCCESS FOR ALL 45 4 SHURLEY METHOD 21 ACCELERATED READ 22 NEW CENTURY COMP 13 TOTAL 435 185 67 13 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: ACCELERATE READ! TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 7 7 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 CLASSROOM MGMT 33 INST AIDE MGMT 16 CLASSROOM DISCIP 27 10 AT RISK STUDENTS 33 15 TOTAL 60 33 25 16 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 POSTAL SERVICE 2 2 STRESS REDUCTION 29 9 HUMAN RELATIONS 27 12 EXTRAVANGANZA 5 PARENT WORKSHOP 3 2 AS400 2 1 PURCHASING 1 1 HIV \u0026amp; AIDS 1 3 GANG DYNAMICS 1 1 1 1 PROJECT SPIRIT 1 1 GREEN CIRCLE 1 1 CONFLICT 1 1 PARENT INVOLEMEN 31 6 OPEN COURT 34 11 TOTAL 95 52 27 18 FUIBRIGHT   POSITION CERTIFIED POSITIONS PRINCIPAL ASST PRINCIPAL CLASSROOM TEACHERS COUNSELOR MEDIA SPECIALIST REMDL/COMP READING GIFTED/TALENTED RESOURCE/TEACHER MUSIC SUBTOTAL CERTIFIED SUBTOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FULBRIGHT B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 2 13 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 POSITIONS 0 11 3 20 0 1 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 1 1 23 2 1 2 2 2 1 35 00 31.43 8.57 57.14 00 2.86 35 % BLACK 00 100.00 30.43 50.00 00 50.00 50.00 00 00 31.43 31.43 POSITION SUPPORT POSITIONS CAFETERIA WORKER CUSTODIANS MEDIA CLERK REGISTRAR SECRETARY NURSE INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES SUPERVISION AIDES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FULBRIGHT B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 0 1 0 2 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL SUPPORT POSITIONS 5 10 0 6 0 0 SUBTOTAL PERCENT 23.81 47.62 00 28.57 00 QUIZ:SSPLST TOTAL 3 4 1 1 1 1 6 4 21 00 21 % BLACK 33.33 100.00 100.00 100.00 00 00 66.67 100.00 71.43 71.43 POSITION TOTAL PERCENT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STAFFING/SCHOOL PERSONNEL AS OF 10/29/97 FULBRIGHT QUIZ:SSPLST B L A C K W H I T E O T H E R M F M F M F 5 21 3 26 8.93 37.50 5.36 46.43 0 .oo 1 1.79 TOTAL 56 56 % BLACK 46.43 46.43 01 LRSD SCHOOL ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPROl PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Black Black White White Other Other Total Black Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Percent K 24 14 14 17 0 1 70 54.3% SP 1 0 3 0 0 0 4 25.0% 01 18 24 16 26 1 1 86 48.8% 02 22 7 10 26 1 0 66 43.9% 03 18 10 17 25 1 1 72 38.9% 04 17 19 18 17 0 0 71 50. 7% 05 24 14 9 16 2 0 65 58.5% 06 13 19 16 16 1 0 65 49.2% Total 137 107 103 143 6 3 499 48.9% 27.5% 21.4% 20.6% 28.7% 1.2% .6% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 1 PAGE SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K COOPER D. 1 5 4 4 4 17 52.9% K FAUSETT L. 1 7 3 3 4 17 58.8% K HURD J. 1 6 5 2 5 18 61.1% K WYATT M. 1 6 2 5 4 1 18 44.4% 01 BUFFORD S, 1 2 2 .0% 01 JONES K. 1 4 7 4 6 1 22 50.0% 01 KAVANAUGH M. 1 4 6 5 7 22 45.5% 01 SIMPSON K. 1 5 5 4 7 21 47.6% 01 WESTLAKE B. 1 5 6 3 6 1 21 52.4% 02 GRAY P. 1 8 4 4 7 23 52.2% 02 NASH E. 1 8 1 3 9 1 22 40.9% 02 PENN c. 1 6 2 3 10 21 38 .1% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 2 PAGE SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ******TEACHER****** ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** Class Teacher BM BF WM WF OM OF SP BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black 03 BUFFORD S. 1 1 1 2 50.0% 03 DAVIS W. 1 5 6 4 8 1 24 45.8% 03 HARRIS s. 1 6 2 7 8 23 34.8% 03 WILSON J. 1 7 2 6 9 1 25 36.0% 04 ROBERTSON s. 1 5 7 6 7 25 48.0% 04 HONORE'-SMITH K. 1 6 7 6 4 23 56.5% 04 WATSON T. 1 6 5 6 6 23 47.8% 05 GADDIE o. 1 10 4 3 5 1 23 60.9% 05 GRINAGE K. 1 7 4 3 6 1 21 52.4% 05 SMITH C. 1 1 1 100.0% 05 WILLIAMS I. 1 7 5 3 5 20 60.0% 06 FOOTE C. 1 2 7 6 7 22 40.9% 01 LRSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CLASS ENROLLMENT SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class Teacher 06 06 ROBINSONS. SMITH C. BM ******TEACHER****** BF WM WF OM OF SP 1 1 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHP 3 PAGE ****CLASS ENROLLMENT**** BM 6 5 BF 6 6 WM 5 5 WF 5 4 OM 1 OF Total % Count Black 22 21 54.5% 52.4% 01 LRSD SPECIAL ED STUDENTS 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO3 SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Autism 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Mentally Retarded 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% Multihandicapped 1 0 2 1 0 0 4 25.0% Orthopedically Handicapped 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 .0% Specific Learning Disability 1 1 3 0 0 0 5 40.0% Speech or Language Impaired 4 2 6 3 0 0 15 40.0% Visually Handicapped 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 .0% TOTALS 8 3 11 7 0 0 29 37.9% 01 LRSD GIFTED ENROLLMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Program Black Black White White Other Other Total % Male Female Male Female Male Female Count Black Gifted/Talented 5 19 27 29 2 0 82 29.3% 01 LRSD STUDENT RETENTION 10/29/97 QUIZ:SCHPRO4 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Class BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Count Black K 2 1 3 100.0% 01 1 2 1 4 75.0% 02 1 1 2 50.0% 03 1 1 100.0% 04 1 1 .0% 01 LRSD EXTRACURRICULAR/EXTENDED EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TOTAL MEMBERSHIP ADULT SPONSORS ACTIVITY BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Just Say No .0% 1 1 100.0% Student Council 4 7 8 10 29 37.9% 1 1 2 .0% Monitors 3 1 4 1 9 44.4% 1 1 100.0% TOTAL 7 8 12 11 38 39.5% 2 1 1 4 50.0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total BIRACIAL COMMITT P.T.A. BOARD MBR V.I.P.S. 3 1 2 4 6 4 % Black 50.0% .0% .0% BM 1 10/29/97 PAGE PARENTS/PATRONS BF 1 1 WM 1 WF 1 5 2 OM 1 OF Total 4 6 2 % Black 50.0% 16.7% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % PARENT WORKSHOPS SCHOOL IMPROV CO Recruitment 1 2 1 1 1 4 2 6 2 Black 50.0% 33.3% 50.0% BM 1 10/29/97 PAGE 2 PARENTS/PATRONS BF WM WF OM OF Total % 2 1 Black 3 100.0% 1 .0% .0% 01 LRSD SCHOOL COMMITTEES/PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 3 SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES PARENTS/PATRONS COMMITTEE BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % BM BF WM WF OM OF Total % Black Black Partners 2 7 9 22.2% .0% TOTAL 9 2 18 29 31.0% 2 4 1 9 16 37.5% 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT EDUCATIONAL EQUITY SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 PREJUDICE REDUC. 29 TESA 16 RACE RELATIONS 35 HUMAN RELATIONS 33 CULTURAL RELAT. Parent Cont. 35 TOTAL 113 35 10/29/97 PAGE 1 SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 6 3 9 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 PAGE 1 MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM DELIVERY SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 Multicult. Guide 26 AR Crusade 7 3 Math Task Ctr 4 Soc Stud Pilot 4 COOP. LEARNING 33 Int. Lang. Arts 34 TOTAL 66 45 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT 10/29/97 SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SPECIFIC TRAINING RELATED TO: ASSERTIVE DISCIP CLASSROOM MGMT. Disc. Mgt. Pgd. Disc. TOTAL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 27 33 23 6 83 6 PAGE 1 01 LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT 10/29/97 OTHER STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF NUMBER COMPLETING NUMBER COMPLETING SPECIFIC TRAINING PRIOR TO DURING PRIOR TO DURING RELATED TO: 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 1996-97 Integrating Curr Social Skills Tr TOTAL PAGE 1\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "}],"pages":{"current_page":433,"next_page":434,"prev_page":432,"total_pages":6766,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":5184,"total_count":81191,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"educator_resource_mediums_sms","items":[{"value":"lesson plans","hits":319},{"value":"teaching guides","hits":53},{"value":"timelines (chronologies)","hits":43},{"value":"online exhibitions","hits":38},{"value":"bibliographies","hits":15},{"value":"study guides","hits":11},{"value":"annotated bibliographies","hits":9},{"value":"learning modules","hits":6},{"value":"worksheets","hits":6},{"value":"slide shows","hits":4},{"value":"quizzes","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":40200},{"value":"StillImage","hits":35114},{"value":"MovingImage","hits":4552},{"value":"Sound","hits":3248},{"value":"Collection","hits":41},{"value":"InteractiveResource","hits":25}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"Peppler, Jim","hits":4965},{"value":"Phay, John E.","hits":4712},{"value":"University of Mississippi. Bureau of Educational Research","hits":4707},{"value":"Baldowski, Clifford H., 1917-1999","hits":2599},{"value":"Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission","hits":2255},{"value":"Thurmond, Strom, 1902-2003","hits":2077},{"value":"WSB-TV (Television station : Atlanta, Ga.)","hits":1475},{"value":"Newman, I. DeQuincey (Isaiah DeQuincey), 1911-1985","hits":1003},{"value":"The State Media Company (Columbia, S.C.)","hits":926},{"value":"Atlanta Journal-Constitution","hits":844},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":778}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"African Americans--Civil rights","hits":9441},{"value":"Civil rights","hits":8347},{"value":"African Americans","hits":5895},{"value":"Mississippi--Race relations","hits":5750},{"value":"Race relations","hits":5607},{"value":"Education, Secondary","hits":5083},{"value":"Education, Elementary","hits":4729},{"value":"Segregation in education--Mississippi","hits":4727},{"value":"Education--Pictorial works","hits":4707},{"value":"Civil rights demonstrations","hits":4436},{"value":"Civil rights workers","hits":3530}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966--Correspondence","hits":1888},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1809},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1709},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1312},{"value":"Baker, Augusta, 1911-1998","hits":1282},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1071},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":858},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":814},{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":719},{"value":"Mizell, M. Hayes","hits":674},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":626}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"name_authoritative_sms","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":2598},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1909},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1704},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1331},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1070},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":856},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":806},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":625},{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":605},{"value":"Snelling, Paula","hits":580},{"value":"Williams, Hosea, 1926-2000","hits":431}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Nobel Prize","hits":1763},{"value":"Ole Miss Integration","hits":1670},{"value":"Housing Act of 1961","hits":965},{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":704},{"value":"Memphis Sanitation Workers Strike","hits":366},{"value":"Selma-Montgomery March","hits":337},{"value":"Freedom Summer","hits":306},{"value":"Freedom Rides","hits":214},{"value":"Poor People's Campaign","hits":180},{"value":"University of Georgia Integration","hits":173},{"value":"University of Alabama Integration","hits":140}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":17820},{"value":"United States, Georgia, Fulton County, Atlanta, 33.749, -84.38798","hits":5428},{"value":"United States, Alabama, Montgomery County, Montgomery, 32.36681, -86.29997","hits":5151},{"value":"United States, Georgia, 32.75042, -83.50018","hits":4862},{"value":"United States, South Carolina, 34.00043, -81.00009","hits":4610},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":4177},{"value":"United States, Alabama, 32.75041, -86.75026","hits":3943},{"value":"United States, Mississippi, 32.75041, -89.75036","hits":2910},{"value":"United States, Tennessee, Shelby County, Memphis, 35.14953, -90.04898","hits":2579},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":2430},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":2387}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Georgia","hits":12843},{"value":"Alabama","hits":11307},{"value":"Mississippi","hits":10219},{"value":"South Carolina","hits":8503},{"value":"Arkansas","hits":4583},{"value":"Texas","hits":4399},{"value":"Tennessee","hits":3770},{"value":"Florida","hits":2601},{"value":"Ohio","hits":2391},{"value":"North Carolina","hits":1893},{"value":"New York","hits":1667}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1966","hits":10514},{"value":"1963","hits":10193},{"value":"1965","hits":10119},{"value":"1956","hits":9832},{"value":"1955","hits":9611},{"value":"1964","hits":9268},{"value":"1968","hits":9243},{"value":"1962","hits":9152},{"value":"1967","hits":8771},{"value":"1957","hits":8460},{"value":"1958","hits":8242},{"value":"1961","hits":8241},{"value":"1959","hits":8046},{"value":"1960","hits":7940},{"value":"1954","hits":7239},{"value":"1969","hits":7235},{"value":"1950","hits":7117},{"value":"1953","hits":6968},{"value":"1970","hits":6743},{"value":"1971","hits":6337},{"value":"1977","hits":6280},{"value":"1952","hits":6161},{"value":"1972","hits":6144},{"value":"1951","hits":6045},{"value":"1975","hits":5806},{"value":"1976","hits":5771},{"value":"1974","hits":5729},{"value":"1973","hits":5591},{"value":"1979","hits":5329},{"value":"1978","hits":5318},{"value":"1980","hits":5279},{"value":"1995","hits":4829},{"value":"1981","hits":4724},{"value":"1994","hits":4654},{"value":"1948","hits":4596},{"value":"1949","hits":4571},{"value":"1996","hits":4486},{"value":"1982","hits":4330},{"value":"1947","hits":4316},{"value":"1985","hits":4226},{"value":"1998","hits":4225},{"value":"1997","hits":4202},{"value":"1983","hits":4174},{"value":"1984","hits":4065},{"value":"1946","hits":4046},{"value":"1999","hits":4018},{"value":"1945","hits":4017},{"value":"1990","hits":3937},{"value":"1986","hits":3919},{"value":"1943","hits":3899},{"value":"1944","hits":3895},{"value":"1942","hits":3867},{"value":"2000","hits":3808},{"value":"2001","hits":3790},{"value":"1940","hits":3764},{"value":"1941","hits":3757},{"value":"1987","hits":3657},{"value":"2002","hits":3538},{"value":"1991","hits":3507},{"value":"1936","hits":3506},{"value":"1939","hits":3500},{"value":"1938","hits":3465},{"value":"1937","hits":3449},{"value":"1992","hits":3444},{"value":"1993","hits":3422},{"value":"2003","hits":3403},{"value":"1930","hits":3377},{"value":"1989","hits":3355},{"value":"1935","hits":3306},{"value":"1933","hits":3270},{"value":"1934","hits":3270},{"value":"1988","hits":3269},{"value":"1932","hits":3254},{"value":"1931","hits":3239},{"value":"2005","hits":3057},{"value":"2004","hits":2909},{"value":"1929","hits":2789},{"value":"2006","hits":2774},{"value":"1928","hits":2271},{"value":"1921","hits":2123},{"value":"1925","hits":2039},{"value":"1927","hits":2025},{"value":"1924","hits":2011},{"value":"1926","hits":2009},{"value":"1920","hits":1975},{"value":"1923","hits":1954},{"value":"1922","hits":1928},{"value":"2016","hits":1925},{"value":"2007","hits":1629},{"value":"2008","hits":1578},{"value":"2011","hits":1575},{"value":"2019","hits":1537},{"value":"1919","hits":1532},{"value":"2009","hits":1532},{"value":"1918","hits":1530},{"value":"2015","hits":1527},{"value":"2013","hits":1518},{"value":"2010","hits":1515},{"value":"2014","hits":1481},{"value":"2012","hits":1467}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"0193","max":"2035","count":500952,"missing":56},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"photographs","hits":10708},{"value":"correspondence","hits":9437},{"value":"black-and-white photographs","hits":7678},{"value":"negatives (photographs)","hits":7513},{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":4462},{"value":"letters (correspondence)","hits":3623},{"value":"oral histories (literary works)","hits":3607},{"value":"black-and-white negatives","hits":2740},{"value":"editorial cartoons","hits":2620},{"value":"newspapers","hits":1955},{"value":"manuscripts (documents)","hits":1692}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/","hits":41178},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":17554},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/UND/1.0/","hits":8828},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/","hits":6864},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/","hits":2186},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/","hits":1778},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-CR/1.0/","hits":1115},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","hits":197},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/","hits":60},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-RUU/1.0/","hits":51},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","hits":27}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Jim Peppler Southern Courier Photograph Collection","hits":4956},{"value":"John E. Phay Collection ","hits":4706},{"value":"John J. Herrera Papers","hits":3288},{"value":"Baldy Editorial Cartoons, 1946-1982, 1997: Clifford H. Baldowski Editorial Cartoons at the Richard B. Russell Library.","hits":2607},{"value":"Sovereignty Commission Online","hits":2335},{"value":"Strom Thurmond Collection, Mss 100","hits":2068},{"value":"Alabama Media Group Collection","hits":2067},{"value":"Black Trailblazers, Leaders, Activists, and Intellectuals in Cleveland","hits":2033},{"value":"Rosa Parks Papers","hits":1948},{"value":"Isaiah DeQuincey Newman, (1911-1985), Papers, 1929-2003","hits":1904},{"value":"Lillian Eugenia Smith Papers (circa 1920-1980)","hits":1887}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"John Davis Williams Library. Department of Archives and Special Collections","hits":8885},{"value":"Alabama. Department of Archives and History","hits":8146},{"value":"Atlanta University Center Robert W. Woodruff Library","hits":4102},{"value":"South Caroliniana Library","hits":4024},{"value":"University of North Texas. Libraries","hits":3854},{"value":"Hargrett Library","hits":3292},{"value":"University of South Carolina. Libraries","hits":3212},{"value":"Richard B. Russell Library for Political Research and Studies","hits":2874},{"value":"Mississippi. Department of Archives and History","hits":2825},{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":2633},{"value":"Rhodes College","hits":2264}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":80736},{"value":"Collection","hits":455}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":80994},{"value":"true","hits":197}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}