{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"bcas_p15728coll3_21813","title":"W. Lester Bowie individual file","collection_id":"bcas_p15728coll3","collection_title":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies Documents Collection","dcterms_contributor":["Bowie, W. Lester"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, Dunbar High School, 34.73231, -92.28654"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2000-10-24"],"dcterms_description":["This folder contains documents and photographs donated by W. Lester Bowie.","This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : University of Arkansas at Little Rock Center for Arkansas History and Culture"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["National Dunbar Alumni Association historical collection, 1880-2016 (UALR.MS.0021)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["African American--History--Arkansas","African Americans--Arkansas--Little Rock","Dunbar High School (Little Rock, Ark.)","Education--Arkansas--History","Education--Arkansas--Little Rock","Education, Secondary","School integration--Arkansas--Little Rock","Segregation in education--Arkansas--Little Rock"],"dcterms_title":["W. Lester Bowie individual file"],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15728coll3/id/21813"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"noa_sohpcr_r-0142","title":"Oral history interview with John Thomas Moore, October 18, 2000","collection_id":"noa_sohpcr","collection_title":"Oral Histories of the American South: The Civil Rights Movement","dcterms_contributor":["Weber, Chris","Southern Oral History Program"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, North Carolina, Durham County, Durham, 35.99403, -78.89862"],"dcterms_creator":["Moore, John Thomas, d. 2001"],"dc_date":["2000-10-18"],"dcterms_description":["Bishop John Thomas Moore Jr. says that Jesus began speaking to him when he was still in high school. His peers did not understand him, but his faith gave him the strength to endure their puzzlement, and he entered the ministry in 1957, just after he graduated. He had an active career, much of it in Durham, North Carolina, where he eventually founded the New Gospel Horizon Resurrection Holy Church, Inc. Moore's father died in a hospital when Moore was young, the victim of a brutal beating and an unsuccessful amputation. His father's death may have inspired Moore to use his faith to heal his congregants, laying hands upon them, and to bring his religious devotion to elder care facilities, a practice he stopped shortly before this interview because of his own health problems. Moore is fiercely devoted to God and believes that God and the devil are at work in his daily life. This conviction drives this interview, as Moore recalls his career in the ministry and his struggle with diabetes, an ordeal that, according to Moore, pitted God and the devil against one another on the battlefield of Moore's body. This belief gives Moore a split worldview, one that sees the glorious potential of God's love, but also the insidious influence of the devil and a steady decline toward the apocalypse described in the book of Revelation. His struggles -- including a troubled marriage and his efforts to uplift the black community -- and his successes all inspire him to further devotion. This interview provides a detailed portrait of the role of religion in one man's life and his efforts to use his devotion to shape the world around him.","The Civil Rights Digital Library received support from a National Leadership Grant for Libraries awarded to the University of Georgia by the Institute of Museum and Library Services for the aggregation and enhancement of partner metadata."],"dc_format":["text/html","text/xml","audio/mpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":["Forms part of Oral histories of the American South collection."],"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["African American clergy--North Carolina--Durham","African American Pentecostals--North Carolina--Durham","African Americans--Religious life--North Carolina--Durham"],"dcterms_title":["Oral history interview with John Thomas Moore, October 18, 2000"],"dcterms_type":["Text","Sound"],"dcterms_provenance":["University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Documenting the American South (Project)"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://docsouth.unc.edu/sohp/R-0142/menu.html"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["transcripts","sound recordings","oral histories (literary works)"],"dcterms_extent":["Title from menu page (viewed on Nov. 20, 2008).","Interview participants: John Thomas Moore, interviewee; Christopher Weber, interviewer.","Duration: 01:29:33.","This electronic edition is part of the UNC-Chapel Hill digital library, Documenting the American South. It is a part of the collection Oral histories of the American South.","Text encoded by Jennifer Joyner. Sound recordings digitized by Aaron Smithers."],"dlg_subject_personal":["Moore, John Thomas, -2001"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"noa_sohpcr_k-0481","title":"Oral history interview with Madge Hopkins, October 17, 2000","collection_id":"noa_sohpcr","collection_title":"Oral Histories of the American South: The Civil Rights Movement","dcterms_contributor":["Grundy, Pamela","Southern Oral History Program"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, North Carolina, Mecklenburg County, Charlotte, 35.22709, -80.84313"],"dcterms_creator":["Hopkins, Madge, 1943-"],"dc_date":["2000-10-17"],"dcterms_description":["Madge Hopkins, a graduate of West Charlotte High School and the vice principal of the school at the time of the interview, describes her experiences growing up in segregated Charlotte and desegregation at West Charlotte. Hopkins remembers the humiliating environment segregation created, but she describes herself as \"traditional,\" she was reluctant to join student protests at West Charlotte being instigated by a younger generation of African American students. Her belief, at the time of the interview, that the majority-black West Charlotte was a separate and unequal school indicates her concern that the promises of desegregation might not yet have been realized.","The Civil Rights Digital Library received support from a National Leadership Grant for Libraries awarded to the University of Georgia by the Institute of Museum and Library Services for the aggregation and enhancement of partner metadata."],"dc_format":["text/html","text/xml","audio/mpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":["Forms part of Oral histories of the American South collection."],"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["Teachers--North Carolina--History--20th century","West Charlotte High School (N.C.)","Charlotte (N.C.)--Race relations","School integration--North Carolina--Mecklenburg County","Busing for school integration--North Carolina--Mecklenburg County","African American women teachers--North Carolina","African Americans--North Carolina--Charlotte","African Americans--North Carolina--Charlotte--Attitudes","Second Ward High School (Charlotte, N.C.)","African Americans--Education--North Carolina","School integration--North Carolina--Charlotte"],"dcterms_title":["Oral history interview with Madge Hopkins, October 17, 2000"],"dcterms_type":["Text","Sound"],"dcterms_provenance":["University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Documenting the American South (Project)"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://docsouth.unc.edu/sohp/K-0481/menu.html"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["transcripts","sound recordings","oral histories (literary works)"],"dcterms_extent":["Title from menu page (viewed on November 5, 2007).","Interview participants: Madge Hopkins, interviewee; Pamela Grundy, interviewer.","Duration: 01:04:14.","This electronic edition is part of the UNC-CH digital library, Documenting the American South. It is a part of the collection Oral histories of the American South.","Text encoded by Mike Millner. Sound recordings digitized by Aaron Smithers."],"dlg_subject_personal":["Hopkins, Madge, 1943?-"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"tws_33969_34147","title":"Russell Sugarmon Jr., Memphis lawyer and judge, 2000","collection_id":"tws_33969","collection_title":"Everett R. Cook Oral History Collection","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Tennessee, Shelby County, Memphis, 35.14953, -90.04898"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2000-10-13"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/msword","image/png","audio/mpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":null,"dcterms_publisher":["Memphis, Tenn. : Rhodes College"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["https://vimeo.com/289801133"],"dcterms_subject":["Oral history","Interviews","Memphis (Tenn.)","Civil rights","African American universities and colleges","Municipal government","Voting","National Association for the Advancement of Colored People","Education","City councils--Tennessee--Memphis","Political science","Politics and government","City planning"],"dcterms_title":["Russell Sugarmon Jr., Memphis lawyer and judge, 2000"],"dcterms_type":["Sound"],"dcterms_provenance":["Rhodes College"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.handle.net/10267/34147"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Smith, Maxine"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"tws_33969_34113","title":"Fred Davis, Shelby Country Democratic Club, 2000","collection_id":"tws_33969","collection_title":"Everett R. Cook Oral History Collection","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Tennessee, Shelby County, Memphis, 35.14953, -90.04898"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2000-10-11"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/msword","image/png","audio/mpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":null,"dcterms_publisher":["Memphis, Tenn. : Rhodes College"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["https://vimeo.com/289801130"],"dcterms_subject":["Oral history","Interviews","Memphis (Tenn.)","Civil rights","Religion","Music","National Association for the Advancement of Colored People"],"dcterms_title":["Fred Davis, Shelby Country Democratic Club, 2000"],"dcterms_type":["Sound"],"dcterms_provenance":["Rhodes College"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.handle.net/10267/34113"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Sugarmon, Russell B., Jr."],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"tws_33969_34140","title":"Maxine Smith, Executive Secretary of the Memphis NAACP, 2000","collection_id":"tws_33969","collection_title":"Everett R. Cook Oral History Collection","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Tennessee, Shelby County, Memphis, 35.14953, -90.04898"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2000-10-09"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/msword","image/png","audio/mpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":null,"dcterms_publisher":["Memphis, Tenn. : Rhodes College"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["https://vimeo.com/289801127"],"dcterms_subject":["Oral history","Interviews","Memphis (Tenn.)","Civil rights","Women","National Association for the Advancement of Colored People","Voting","Protest movements"],"dcterms_title":["Maxine Smith, Executive Secretary of the Memphis NAACP, 2000"],"dcterms_type":["Sound"],"dcterms_provenance":["Rhodes College"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.handle.net/10267/34140"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Smith, Maxine"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"tws_33969_34143","title":"Vasco Smith, Shelby County Commissioner, 2000","collection_id":"tws_33969","collection_title":"Everett R. Cook Oral History Collection","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Tennessee, Shelby County, Memphis, 35.14953, -90.04898"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2000-10-09"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/msword","image/png","audio/mpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":null,"dcterms_publisher":["Memphis, Tenn. : Rhodes College"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["https://vimeo.com/289801128"],"dcterms_subject":["Oral history","Interviews","Memphis (Tenn.)","Civil rights","National Association for the Advancement of Colored People","Women","Political science","Nonprofit organizations","Sanitation workers","Protest movements"],"dcterms_title":["Vasco Smith, Shelby County Commissioner, 2000"],"dcterms_type":["Sound"],"dcterms_provenance":["Rhodes College"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.handle.net/10267/34143"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"hbcula_becu_244","title":"Dr. Mary McLeod Bethune Slideshow, October 2000","collection_id":"hbcula_becu","collection_title":"Bethune-Cookman University Digital Collection","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Florida, Volusia County, Panama Beach, 28.86832, -81.22778"],"dcterms_creator":["Bethune-Cookman University"],"dc_date":["2000-10"],"dcterms_description":["This video features a slideshow of Dr. Mary McLeod Bethune and the early years of Bethune-Cookman College."],"dc_format":["video/mpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["African American universities and colleges","College presidents","African American women","African American students","African Americans--Education"],"dcterms_title":["Dr. Mary McLeod Bethune Slideshow, October 2000"],"dcterms_type":["MovingImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) Library Alliance"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["https://hbcudigitallibrary.auctr.edu/digital/collection/becu/id/244"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["All rights to images are held by the respective holding institution. This image is posted publicly for non-profit educational uses, excluding printed publication. For permission to reproduce images and/or for copyright information contact University Archives, Bethune-Cookman University, Daytona Beach, FL 32114 (386) 481-2186. http://www.cookman.edu/academics/library/index.html"],"dcterms_medium":["vhs"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_233","title":"Enrollment, Little Rock School District (LRSD), North Little Rock School District (NLRSD) and Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD), gender and racial count, school capacity, and transfers","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2000-10-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Educational statistics","Education and state","Little Rock School District","School attendance","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County"],"dcterms_title":["Enrollment, Little Rock School District (LRSD), North Little Rock School District (NLRSD) and Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD), gender and racial count, school capacity, and transfers"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/233"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n11/20/2000 11:43 5013242079 M TOM STUDEl\u0026lt;T QUARTERLY ATI'FNDANCE REPORT FY 2000/01 LRSDF INANCIALS ERV (FOR CALCULATING \u0026gt;m, ADA. A.ND ADM OF M TO M SOI~ STIJCllm'S n: Gll.l\\.OES K-U) LEA: 6001000 COUNTY, PUUSKl DIS:rRICT, Little Rock School District QUARTER NO. 1 2 3 4 5 6 DAYS DAYS DAYS PJU!SEN't n: PRESENT NON- DA.YS A.OT ADA QTR l'!VWSPORTED TRANSPORTED ABSENT 2/1 2+3/1 II0!:1-RESXDEltt s=s 1\\1.:Q.IV?\nD TO (BY M TO M 't'RANSFJ.R.) 77 91 LITTLE ROCT. 42 0 0 0.00 0.00 7702 NORTH ,-ITTLI! ROCK 42 0 5S l3 o.oo ]..28 7703 PU\"!ASKI CO SPECIAL 42 0 15677 1154 Q.Oo 36~-Be 1 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 1.58 3,1. 74 TOTAL l\\DT, Al:lA, AND ADM OF l'I TO 11 RECEIVED, 0,00 366.16 3~3.n STtlDEN'tS El,IQIJ!LE TO l!E COUNTliD AS 'nUINSl/ORTED WCL\\IOE M81D~ 8tu0El'ITS RESIO~NG TWO llO\\ln: !'!IL$ OR l'IORE FP.OM T!!ElR RESPCTIVE ASSIGNED SO!OOLS PAGE: l PAGE 01 \u0026gt;:--. p- 4 M TOM STUDENTQ UARTERLAYT TENDANCREE POR? ., FY 2000/0l I FOR CJU.CULATINAGll T, ADA, AND AOM OF M TO M SCHOOLS TODE!rrS IN ORADes K-12 J LEA: 6002000 COUNTY: PULASKI NON-R~SIOENTS TUDENTSR ECErvso TO (BY M TO M TMNSF'ER} 7701 LITTr.E ROCK 7702 NORTH tlTTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL 1 DAYS lN QI'R 44 DISTRIC'r: N. Little Rock School 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED a 0 J DA~S PRESENT NON- '!'RANSPORTED 777 0 4 DAYS ABSENT 78 0 DistrictQUAR'J'ER NO. 1 5 ADT 2/1 o.oo o.oo 6 ADA 2+3/1 17 ,66 7 ~DH 2+3+4/1 19.  3 44 0 11837 437 o.oo 'l'OTAL A\", Al\u0026gt;A, AND ADM OP M TO M RECEIVED, ~ . 00 286 . 6 6 298 . 37 SR'El'USPDE..C,.TS IVELEAI GSSIBIGLNE ETDOS C8EH OCOOLUSN TEO AS TRANSPO!!TEIDlf CLODER SStDEHTs ,:tlDENTS !IBSIDING\" '10 ROOTM ILtS OR MORB FROM THEIR 0,00 269,00 o.oo 278.94 l CS) I.D ~ U1 U1 CS) ..... --J .--.J. .. CD CS) CS) ..... CS) ........ l.e.s.\u0026gt;.. I I ,NOV-27-M00O 0N8 :08A M Melissa M to M as follows: NI.R to PULASKI LR to PULASKI Doug ADM -- 187.9 ADM--1122.5 FAXN O. P. 01 MAGNET STUDENI'. QUl\\RTERLY /,TTENDIINCE REPORT rt 2000/01 (FOR CALCULATING ADT. ADA\n,'ND A1lM OF ~GNE?: SCHOOL STI/DENTS IN Gl!ADES K-12) LEA: 6001000 COUNTY: PUI:.:.SKl DISTRICT, Lictle Rock School District QU?.RT.:R NO. l 2 3 4 5 6 DAYS DAYS DlYS PRESENT Il'l PRESENT NON DAYS = AilA QTll T!WisPOitTED 'l'.R.Mf8P0Rt:Bt\u0026gt; ll!ISBlr.r 2/1 2+3/J. 7601 Lil'TLE I\\OCI( STIJDENTS SE!ll' TO ?601 Unt.E ROCK 11AQNT SC!IOOLS 3 65406 32633 3819 1~21. 05 2279.95 7602 NORTH LITTLE ROCK S't1JDEl'l'I'S SENT TO 7601 LlTn, ROCK ~ONtl' SC!lOOl-$ 4.3 78 20-!97 873 l.Bl 479. 50 7603 Ptll.ASKI CO SP!iClAL STUDENTS SENT TO ,isoi LI'UI.11' ltOClt MA~ 8CllOOL9 u 7' -t0i55 15U l.B ~2. 6S TOTAL MlT, ADA, AND AllH OF STUDE1'1TS ATIEl'OINli MAGNET SCHOOLS: 111.24.71 3701-10 l'\"'A\\Jt:. t:J.I. l 7 ADM 2+h-t/1 23'S. 77 98. 751 ine.ss 3846 .11 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE 'IO BE COUNTED AS Tl!ANSPORI'ED INCLUDER liSIDENT STUDENTS RESI.llUI~ TWO ROUTS NILES OR NORE FROM. l 'l!EIR RESPECTIVE A.SSI\u0026lt;3NEP SCHOOLS CF- STUDENT REGISTRATION OFFICE LITTL~ ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 501 SHERMAN ST. LITTLE ROCK AR 72202 PHONE: 324-2272 FAX: 324-2281 FAX COVER SHEET To: p~ . . Fax Number:  3 7 1.--oI O 0 From:__..,)d.._.QM._....t ,.\\. {A__ ___ _ Oam:._ . 1_ 1 _-/-\\_f_-O_O_  # Pages Including Cover Sheet . C . . LRSD SCMDGCOL I.Jt~BTYSS C'HOOL 2000/l0/02 PAGE iOOL:0 3\u0026amp; ROCKfELi..ERIN CENTIV.S EC HOOL iass Black Black Ttal White White fo tal Ot.~e!' Other fot-.1 Tc-tal Bl\n.c:k l-lhi ti? Cth\nir Min ~~ !'\\.,)I '/. Mar. !'lale F~le Black Male Feliiale White Male Female Othe\nCuu~t Perce~t ?v.-cent Percer.t !Hark Blac~ Capaci tY 22 17 3'1. 11 12 ~,, i:: .. 2 ~\" 65 60.0Y. ~ 3S.4!4 4.6~ .(lt .% BO '1 2 3 5 3 3 6 (1 12 41.? * 50.Q 5.3% 50.0 50.0 12 12 C' 3 9 5 6 2 3 18 SO.O 33.3'/. 16.7 5(:,0Y, 50.0'/. 18 '3 8 3 16 4 5 9 2 3 28 57 .1 l 32.1 10.n 50.(lt:. 50.01. 36 \u0026gt;4 l~ b i'i 6 10 16 1 2 37 51.41t 4'.3.2'/. 5.4 50.0 so.ox 36 1P (l 0 (J l 0 ,~ ..-,. 0 i .(1)\niOO.Ol: .O .or. .O 0 :l 17 p\n34 8 4 12 l 3 4 50 68.0l( * 24.0Y. e.O'/. .0'4 O\" 60 4' . ~ ):.\n. 13 20 33 9 14 23 0 l 1 57 57.9Y. 'f 40:4 1.8 .O ~oi 6(l 13 i8 16 34 9 8 lb 1 0 1 -, :i. 66,? * 3l.4Y. 2.0Y. .c~ .oi 60 !4 11 13 29 13 5 18 2 0 2 49 59.2% * '.36.7'/. 4.!Y. .O ,0',{ 60 t5 i.o 19 38 b 9 15 2 55 69. l * '2.7.31! 3.6Y. .o~ .O 1,0 ,tal 129 127 25b 'l '75 145 13 'f 22 483 bu.SY. 34.~ 5,2Y. 482 ~~~c)0 8 It 1:/ @3 l~G_d:5 t 7)\n5g 001 CENTRAL .001 l~~~~~~~ l~1\n~~ j~~NTRAL . w:~\n,,-,,---..::: 002 'HALL 002 HALL  wr~\nOctober 2, 2000 Enrollment - Little Rock School District  ... 1~8 o 104: 107 138 ~ ~r~ ~r 11\nr \n1~ ~\n\nr 1\n~: } ) ~ o 101 99 160' w\n1[ w\nr\n:\n w~\n~\n~: w\n~\n:\n1 172: \n: w\nw~ 0. 47: w\n: 442. ::r\n:: w\n: w\nw\no w\nw\nw :\n: 002 r~:.~ :l ~\n116: w~l w\nw~ w~r w:\ni w.:\nww\nr 09.~ :~~~~  w. ::\n:\n.. ........ w\n~f 103: w\n11 8 w~f w~r\n1\nr 2781 ~\n1 \n:r 114\\ ~~~~r 72% 3 T 3: 81 I w7..oww.2 1 4wwo . 3:: 83.. ...45N.  003 MANN M/S  6 ...  .. ~~\nwl~~~~ ~\n:\n1 WW\n: W\nr W\n W\n1 w\n W~ WW~} ~:: W\nWW\n~i W \n1 WW\n~\n80i\n11 w\nr\nr ~I\nr\n:rw 452. :003  ~A~~ M'~. wr\nr :3?.l w~\n:w 53% 005 {P.I\\R.l:\u0026lt;Y.11:\n: \\'\\I 005 : PARKVIEW 005 IPARKVIEW w\n PARKVIEW 006 }BOOKER ~~~ : BOOKER t '006  BOOKER .......  .. 1~ ~~\n BOOKER w N t w\n~~\nl\nw. 11\nww~ nw\nw:\nw\nw ~r\n~ I w:\nl\nr 87.. ~1 w\nw\nl w~ w~t w~\n1 w~\nw~r 76: ~~ w\nr w~r 1 \n1 w\n1 WW\n: w ~\n:: w~\n w\nr w~r ~r w~f w\nr ----==------:r 1: 31\n23' 0 1  19: ~\n\n1\n~r-~~1r\n1 ~r 31 33:  ~\nr)\n1\nr ~I\n~ 2 ol  ~~ 16= 2r 1l ~r ~ .w\n:1 o w\ni ~~\n\nr- ~ w\n\nr ~1 w\n~r w\n~ 22\nr o 11  w\nr 303 007 iDUNBAR w\n91. ~\nr w\nw\n1 \n\n: ww\n007 I DUNBAR w r\nw~I :: ~\nr 72 w:: WW\nr\nt\n: :\nw\n: .007 l~:~\nWI~ \n1:.I w\n\n1 w\nr -~r\nr w:: :\n: w\n  w\n:1 008 r\n:\nw~r o\n~ 118\nw:\nw\n\n:1 w\nw\n~\n008 l\n:\n w~l --~ 86 w ~~I\n\nw ~tN ~\nr\nr 215: \n~: w\n1 \nr 1r ~ w~ 12:\niw 224 w I .... ::::\n~ . ..] !.\\ .. 2.. ~ .::::~\n:r:\n:\n.r.i. .v  ~\n\nr ~\n1 1, 82 981 3.. 2 o w~i 53I 35 w\n: w.\nr 1 : w\nw~: 42. \nr w\n::1 008 FAIR 008 1\n:\n. 009 i FORST HT 6 545:: 56% .... ...- .-,-.....j\n-,-,- \"\"\n3\"r :~J ,.% 2}=jjf:.O% 77 \nr 1\n! w~ 34 w :~!\n~~1~-.d 244 o. 1: ~~:\n~\n\nr 1  J ~r  ) 009 :\n~~~~ :\nw l\n ~I 009 \n~RST HT l\n~ WJ \nJ6?f o : )      , 35  63 2.2.!\\ .  0 3 67 78. 0 1  0 o: 58 6i 269 \nf 1I ..\n1 77 oi \n1~ I~ \n~ :I 46\n~~: :\n~\u0026gt;! ~~~ :\nPUL HT J\n01q ]~uLHT J 1~ 318! 10\nj:56% 011 isoUTHWST l~  ~I ~I 831 83:: ~r 3 ~ Oi 6 } 011 1\n~~~::\n~o! \noi\n1 95( \n\n~~:: 71 \n011 r\n~UTHWST w r~  ~1 N ~1 n 1 73\nr \n \no.  ~r 7 \n~:~r\n1 11   ~\n\nr 92% 012 .MCCLELLA : o ~r175( 16) :rN\nI\nw\n1 11} \n r 012 ::~~:~~:   :\n~1 ~r ~\n:= ::i \n0  \nw~  ~:r\n  . ... ...1 .1  . ... .. 4.....9.. .,,,,,., .,.=:.,:.,,. ..\n~\n1 :\n:~:r:\n ~o = 1\n~:\n\nT\nr \n\n\n\n012 i~\n:\n:~r\n:\n\n::.\n~.::i::i:\n~ :\n:~i 89 :: 4\n~:\n\n1 4 205{ 1041t .... ~9 19 91% P.1} .. H~N9..B~:~ 1~ 1: 0. w\n ::\nl  w\n w~ wr 17 \nr w r 013 HENDERSN 7 ~J~ 1 \n~~~)  \nr\n~r 12 1\nr 186' 1 M J ~1 11\n::i 65' :r~ ~ r~ :\nJ\n~r\nr 435} ~~\nr 28(  ~~~11 77% 2 ~I ~\nr 129  ~r 11\n)\n~: ~r\n~ w r 015 'CLOVRJR ~y ~1~~~\n~I~  ~)  ~: \n1~ 238' .,. w  l 015 ]~:~~\n:\n0 N\n:\n: \n ~1\n1 ~ ~\n\n11.~\nl 52. 55\n~\n186% ~:\n ~~~~~~~ ~r65 97:\n1 \nr\n: \n1 \nrw\nr 198:  r w  016 :~~~~~~~ ~r\n\nr\n:r\n1\n1'\n~\nr\n~ .:  :::::::::::::: 5 ::::: 1 :::: 1 J,,::::::::: ,016 1::\n~~~\nww~I w\nr w\n:: ~r\n\n: w\nr w\n:: J\n:i :\n!\nJw 17 79% 017 'BALE o: 251 \n: w\nl w~l w\n~ ww: ww\n \n: 017 .BALE w~i 18' \n1\nr\n~ 8}ww\nw\nI 017 (BALE ww~I ~ \n\nr ~l ww:1 w\n w :\n1 017 I~\n::~ w w~I w\n\nr 20! ~: \nw\no: WW\n: \nr 49:. 017 .ElA.LE: ::5  \nr 18' \n: w\nw\nr\nr ~1 ww\n1 WW: ::::::::::.:..:..:..:..:.1.:..  :.:.1.\n: ::: \n :\n:~:  ..~: \n o 11: oi -~- .. -\n 015 } CLOVR JR HENDERSN 338 76% 018 I~RADY ,. 1 w ~l\n~ 17 . 1  \nr ~r\nr \nr 018 r~~:~\n~   ~  ii ~\n1l 7\nr 1 ~ .~ ~1 1\n018 ~~:~~N \n 1=: 1  17. 231\n ~ ~r 0. 5 } 50 018 ~~\n~\nl:: J ~l 1 1~: ....? .P.,). ~\nr  ~\nr  ~l  54  018  B RADY 5 1: 0 17: 201\n~?\n)  ~~(  =. ...... ... .. .. . . 1..,., ..,.., . , .. = =,,.. . -. -  . . . .- . . - . ,.,,--,-,,--,,:\\.--.,,-- '018 W.==.\n:\nW : w 0 WW ~f\n W~r\nW ~\n:\nW\n: ~   \u0026lt; ~-r - --...- ----.--.{-.-- --\n:,i\n--:-:'---:'.----c4----o\n...\n_._o..\n:_.... =..-!.~ WW~: W ~'f\u0026gt;W W::::~\n~+{p\n~\nr 66:: 20 W ~~~r 75% 019 .BADGETT 19 0 0 w\n. ~ :r 019 r~:\n~~\n~ w ~ WW~ w~:\n~r \nr \nr W~ 0 ~ ~:\nr ii ::~J ~3% } 020 : MCDERMOT~-\" - - o: ~\n1~~RVER\n~: \nr -~: \n.....\n~ \\ 021 icARVER  r\n\nI ~r\n1 1\n~ t~ \n1r ~1  ~1~~r 021 icARVER N r~ 1. )I\n~:\n~T)\nr\no  1:\nr ~\nr  021 :~\n\n~~~  c 1 i  ~r\n~ \n:\n: ~ w~r  0 ~i\n:\n. .\n.: r 90 ~~~ ~ARVER  l~ ~: ~\nr~\n:~ 11~r r\no{ 20I 1\n, \n: ,\n-~~----- ,-..--------.\u0026lt;.....------- -~\n.- WW\n: WW\n022 .BASELINE \n1 3: ~\n 022 :BASELINE , r\n0} 0'\n:1\n:- ~1\n' \n' ~t 3} : '' : 022 : BASELINE \n-~  ~1\n~1\n:\n\u0026lt;..1\nr  \n1 0 \n ...\n  ::\n1\n.~C\n~a\n:. .a :\n1\n.~. \n1\n ~I 1: \n\nr 022 ~ASELINE .,\n.. 9. O{ 0 11\n\nO, )i \n 42' 'o\n2\n2:\n: .1_:B\nA~:S\n.E\nL~l\nN\nE\n::.::0 :. :~:: ::~.p1~6 c '\nl 2:. ~1 4\n1\n:,\n\"'38 ~ , ~ -~~- 34: 259 \n.,1:\n.:~\n.\n\n~ \\ o --~ \n} \n~! o:\n\na 7i 3 45t\n1\nAIRP .RK \n .. ~: --~ \n1\n:- ~\nw ~r N\nr \nr \n\nFAIRPRK \n.. ~rO:\n~1\n~\n-~\nr:~r\nr 023 ... :\n:\n:  : a .. ~ \n:.\n \n:.\n\n  ~l \n:\nr \nI 023 FAIRP RK  ~ a~ \n~ ~l r ) ) ~ ........ ... .... ..t\n. . 3 16 ::\n:::::~:~f}: \nJ\nl o' :.:.:.. ... 2 024 :FORST PK 1 10 024 \n~~\n~\n \na: -~ \n-~\n-r~ - -~\nr -~:\n:,\n024 FORST PK .. G , ~l 6 \n,\n ~\n --~ \n: N ~: 024 :\n~~ST PK 4 ... ~, \nr \n~ 1~: 0 0 \n~i 14. \n 024 :FORST PK l\nQ.\nr\nr ~ ~\nr\n\nr \n024 FORST PK ~.2.1. O  FORST PK 025 :FRANKLIN w\nr \n\nr ~1\n...: 31 ) 1 1 ar . . 40.' . t:~=t --.l:.....---\"\"------ .... t_~~:\nt: . \\' 2 0 71 ( 025 :FRANKLIN } :: '025 f,~J\\.t--lf\u0026lt;.Llt--1 027 ~IB~S 027 'GIBBS 027:G IBBS  w\n oiw w1~2l. w:\n:~ w\nr ~rw ~110  WW~ 027 GIBBS w  : ][ ~: w~w:\n~l\nI\n  Q Q:  ~: 6} w:w: 027i-~\n~BS 1~ 1 i ~ \nt 1~: 1 1 r\nr ~ 8 :'. :::.':::-  , 1  , ...:. .  .. ,{: ~=--- 028 }CHICOT 028 kHICOT ... f~. ~\nCHICOT w w\n~\n1~:\n~~\nw : 028 ~:\n~~\nw\nlwEsT HIL 029 wr:\n~\n:  w\n029 w:\n:\n:\n:  r\nw 029 w::\n:\n:\n~  w : 030 LEFFRSN 1 030 .JEFFRSN 1~   ~:\n 1:1 v\nr  :JEF\n~SN \n~-  ~141 1:r ) ,l ~ oi\n~1J 030 iJEFFRSN  \"\"C ~1 2:\n~:\n~  0 ~ ) )\n~ \n~   ~ ~ 030 iJEFFRSNW i\nw ~l w~w1\nr~ww~w\n~rwJw\n~r\\w\nw 030 c~\n~w : : w~r~ I\n:r ~w\nWW~ --~: 14 ::\n:.:::I: 031 ::\n:\n:\n\n~ 1 al oi 34 30' o w~: w\nr 031w\n:\n:\nw\n: l\nw ~r 1: 26.\n:~ Tw\nrr ai ~iww~Tww~ 0311\n:\n:\n: WW\nw~rw ~wT\nw\n:wT ~w\nr ~rw ~\niTww w~r 53% 7 ,....,.C.L..O..V..R. E.L. . .::-\n~.~~-\n,:~.- 032 ioooo 1 ~\nwr~QDD wl\nwww\n1\n1\n:1 2' 1 w~.w~ww~w\n' \nr 9.3.?r~~~~ W\nW\n1 a,\n:\n:\nW\nW~.......~ 1'\n 032 I~ODD w [ oi w\n:\n~} 9:\nw.\n.o : ~wr\nr WW: WW\n: 032 toooo 15  w\nl \nr\niw\n: :w\nw\nl ~rw ~r5 w\n:w w\nr\nWI~~~~ w :\nw\n! 15 w\nw\nr ~ WW~\nw :\n1:\n:w t:21! . :...2,. ....7:\n\n  033 fMEADCLIF 1 0 10\n~\nr\n. ~).~\n .:\nr\n~ iMEADCLIF r\n~t 0\n~r\n) \n\nr 0. ~\n1 ~\n  p~~.: ~:~\n~\n~ w\n~ o 1~: 1). ) ) ~ o  ~ ~r\nr 033 :~:~~:\n~  t ~w~l\n~ 1~: 11 1r} 0 ~\n 51{ 033 w1:\n:~~w:\nw:w ~wr ~\nr\n:w\n~w ~ r\nr\nww\nT WW\n w\nw :iw. 033 MEADCLIF : ww ~~w1w\nwi\nw~w WW\n: 7 034'M ITCHELL ==fJ- ... .-w-..o...- w.-l,.\n-. .-.~w-\nw1 --\nw\n w~ 1\nw-I\n.w~-\n.-, WW\nWW\nr\n: wr:\n:~:w:\nal ~w:\nw\nw:\nw\n w\nw ww~\n:lw ~ l ~\n1: :\n:~G::w o ~:w\n:\n):\n! o ..w\n r\n.  1: ww:\n: wr:\n:~w::  :  0. o 24. 0 w\n w\nw 0 . 0. w\nr [\n MITCHELL w~ w  ~ ~\n1 22\n1 0\no, \n1 ww\nl 0~1 w1:\n~:~::: w Q. d\n\nw:=\nQ Q. Q: 034 JMITCHELL\n,'-''' ......:.:---'''''--,,,....-,~- 035 .ML KING -.-..-::.-,,,--,,-,,-,, .... - 035  M ~ ~.l.~G .035  ML KING 036 R OCKFELR (\n~\nw ~~ :\n~:~ :. ...,...- ,.:...... ---r--.........----.--....... 037  GEYER SP  ..................................... ot--1.t' ~ /) .. ~-~--...i.~. \\ w\nl 1 89% 96% ............I. 33 5974 54% ::.:,=,V'\"-'-~'-\"'  037 =GEYER SP ~ ....:.\n1 ~r ~\n: wit\n\n: ~ ~.. ... }\n~- 037 .GEYER SP ......\n0 Q w\n. 26. ~ } 0 ......~..\\. . 2. 1 ...\n.~. r  037 ....~.\n: ....... ~1\n: 15 .....\nr\nr .\n. ... a -~ .. ~l : \n~. .... ... 037  ~~~~~ ~~ ,\n  ~: oi\nx 23 ...... ~ ......\n. ........ ..\n ','.'','.'~i' ,'.'','.'\n......:\nr  037 !~\n\n: \n~: ..\n.... ..\n. ... ..~..l. 1  038 P~~~~ E ... :: ....,, 038 iPUL HT E 2 ., , .......... - . 038 P ULHTE r~ 038 .PUL HT E  1: ..... 038 .PUL HT E 5 038 ~~: :\n~ l:\n.,.-.-.'.'.', ..,-,,---,_,,,,, .. .,,._..,_,. .., : ..,..--.,.-..- -.-.. . _. _ ._._..,._....._ .,_.. _. _ ....,, ,:..:.,,----,:._.. .. ---~-'-'''-:-:\"\"'''~-- 039  RIGHTS EL 039 : RIGHTS EL 039  RIGHTSEL :--,----- 039  RIGHTSEL :---,---- .039 j RIGHTSEL 9~9 :.~.IS3.HT~~L 'o39  RIGHTSEL '040 ......\n~:\n~\n q49 }R\u0026lt;?rv.i1r:-:,1c 040 .ROMINE 040 1R(?l',lllt-llc\n\u0026lt;t() ~OMINE 041 041 21 20 0 0 0 0. 0 0 41. a: 25\n: w\n1\nQ: 0 \nr ','.':\ni ....\n.: ...\n.\n. .....\nr\no o ......~... . .....\n.....\n~:.....  ...~..\n1 ....\n.:  .....\nr\n -~ ~r ~ ...\n.. 1. ...:r.. .w.1...,....6',.'. ..' al .....Q..... ...... o.......... 0' .w,.'w. OW r3. . 4..   }   ..\n.r. .\n..\n.. ..a 1 1... . ....\n.: ... .,..o .... .. . . ::.---.----\n- .-.--::- V .-.-..--..-.\\ ........... -.-c q: o o o. o ....\n.\n1 ....\n.\nr ~. .....\n ....\n. ..........\ni \n: -~r \n~: \n~\n2 \n.....~. \n..... :r \n: ...\n.\n. ~1 ....\n. ...\n.. at ...\n..\nr 042 r:ASHNGTN O 9  5r 042 .WASHNGTN wl\n2' ','.'\n:\n\n'1,'. '\nw\n: ','.'\n: ','.'','.'~i \n~: w\nr 042 ..... r::\n:~~l\n~ ~ 1:\nr ..\n.~.. . .\n. ....w ...\nr\n . .~.....\n.. .:.~. . :\n~A~~~~T.~ ]\n...... ~r~.I 24. 15. 3\n1 oi 0 .......\nw\n.w 71' 65% \\ 10~42 :\n1 W A:S~HNG\nT~N ~\n~ J\n.\n.:\n.: ::~\n:\n.\n.:\n::::~]-:: ~\n,..._--',._...-,- 043 WILLIAMS 043 1:\n:~\n~\n043 ::\n:~\n~\n043 .WILLIAMS 9: 1~ ~~1 \n: !.\n.:1: : :ri.~I \n.:,__ __.. .. ::=+ 1vy1g1AMS .... \n,: 1 .. S?~ ...,...... t ...-........ .............................. . ........... . ...............  24}. ~ 0 ) ~\n111\nr ~a: ~~~-~---~\nr: 14.J ~ 044 Iw1LSON 11 ~1~ r\n1 31 f 1  1   ~ ~t M~/\nr ~~ ~::\n~~~~- 2 .... ~ or\n)\n~1)~r\n~3 1r ~\n: 044 .WILSON ~ 1 i O 1\n23'. ) 1 } ~ 2 1 39 044 w1:\n~\n~~ tw ~:ww~} 1\n:w\n~: w\nlw~~ w~ww\n w:l 044 I:\n~\n~~ w l\nw . ~t ~ w\n~t 21 \n w\nr ~f\nI w~r\nr 43: .::....w.\nV 'w). O. .Kp.... \n w. I\n w~. .w. w0 0 . :.:\n1 i1 3 1 J:.,\n' 4-\n_ ,\n\n_~\n_-~- {]Sr} _0L ..\n:.w~ .,... . 3 16 r~\n57 045 :WOODRUFF 1 o w~r 1~ 1~\n0 o 0 \nr~ ~r ~r  \n: 1\n~\n~\n~ \n~ 1 ~ \n~..:.. 1 .1.\n\n  \n \n:~\n ~~.  045 wooDRUFF wl\n0. ~..\n~r 1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3. ~r  ~1l WW j 045 1:~~~r~: :\nw ~ WW~ w\n~J 16 w\nr w~ w\nw\nw s w\nr w\n:: w . J\n: IwooDRUFF r\nw~i w ~ w\n\nr w\n: w\nr w\nr\nr\n: w\ni WW\nw w\n: I 045 tvyqq[)~lJff 1:w o 17 w\nr w~ w\n w\n0 w.\nr\nl WW  OODRUF .w,.2.~1.~.2.W wo1l wwow..7. 0.  ww1 r w/4wt\u0026gt;. . .6J.. w 2 ... .....w ..s.. . , ?..~~(O, 9.1.~ ~\n~\n~,w r~   o  w~ w\n~f 1s ~ g\n ~t 1 ~( 50 046 .MABEL EL 1\n 0. 0 25.\n1: ) 0\n .w~\n \n~1r 046 .MABEL EL  ~ ~r\n: w~ ~:\n\nr ) ~~ (\nM ~l \n~r 046 .MABEL EL  ~  +~ ~\n~\n~ ~l 1r ) ~\u0026lt; 1~i  ~r ~~\n046 .MABEL EL \n. ~ ~r 2~\n~ ) 1 ) ~ J )\nr ~: .MABEL EL wl: w~ ~11\n.....~... ..w~ \nr\nw 3 w :\n~ ........ ......................... ww ww.  .w w  w 9 . 10.t~ ~~ i~~~~~~~ .. P ... q' .w4\u0026gt; s o\no: 3. 6 1a Q47 .TERRY 1  17 20 3 o 0 25 1~r 047 r\n~ ~r 5. W\nW\nW\nr\nl w\n W\n WW~ 12 W~:r  ~:\nw 1\n~RRY w\n\nr ww~I \nt ...\n~ \n  ~! w\nr\n~~\nr\nERRY w : \n w~r\n\n~) \nr\nw\n\n20' ~\nr 044 .WILSON 89% ~-\n-11\nj~\nj\n. ) 215 1 \nt::::\nJ 46% .\u0026gt; 048 1~~~~~1~~ :1 1  1: ~ ~\nr ~~r  1~r .~\n\n1\n::\n\n:\n\n1\nr\n:\n\n\n\nr~: 17} :\nr  62 048  F~~~~l~H 1\n\n:\n\n1\n~ \n\n,\nr~ \n,r :\nr \nr 9~ 1\n::\n\n\nL: \n:\n\n\nr- -~\n~::\nr -~\nr 048 1\n::\n: w\nw\n!. :\n1\n:\n\n\nr\nr w :t\nr  :\nr\n~: w 0~ :]\n~~\n~ : W \n: 1  .1 WM\n1\n:\na:\n\n72 'O_~.. .. J'ULBRIGH o  , m -18....\n.~\n.-.':-:- ~~\n:~~~~~~ 20, \n-~ ~\n: \n\nr\nr ~\ni'~\n\n~CR.. 1~\n: 1 ... .\n \n~ \n 1~l 1\n1 \n~ P~.P. O TTER c~ 3 o: 10 1~\nr\n ~r\n:\n~ 10  M :\n: 050 .OTT~~CR :. oi ~r\n1 ! \nr 1 ....\nr o ::\nJ ~~r .52 050 .OTTER CR r~ ~:~ 1~ ~.} )\n1f 16\n1r  52. 050 1~\n~\n~\nl\n\n- ~l.\n::::: 0 0 0 ]..'\n.::t:: :: 12\nr\n1:\n:::::::::::::~.~J~~i-::::,.  .\n:::tc.\n:r~\n:r:\n 051 ~AKEFIEL 1 o 20\n! )' 3 o oI 1, 6 59 051  ~~~~F'.1~.~\n w\n1\n: w\n\n1\nw\nr\n. w  \nr 051 :~AKEFIEL w  L 0. 22! 18: w.\nw :\n\n1\n1\nr ~\n=WAKEFIEL  r: \n w\n1\n \nr 2! w\nw 53! 051 lWAKEFIEL  w\noi 1 f 24 22)\n\nl \n 0 ,\n:r .. o ......... .5... ...A.:..W.. 1..F.. . 1. K...E. ..E. .L\n.  , ~ ~ 25. \nr\n \n, ~ o.\n \n :1: .......... ..Y)...... .P.  .. ......:.  J: .s ...o .  .. ...: .:.  ) :.  , .(iL 051 cWAKEFIEL ~/.~ 1[~ .\n:~~\n: ~J\no .. .9.'. J[ ~\n:::\n~~ 1 o o 30 38 ~ ~I()L ... 2 ... ?.. 1L 71 052 :WATSON r\n -~: '~I 38 :\nr o 1 r ~r o: 0 1 r\nr g~?..::\n~~ ~ -~ \n1-~ ~\n1:-:- ~\nr o: ::\n\n: 61 052 1:\n~ ~~ : o ~r ~~}\n~:\n= 2 ~r O o'\n052 :WATSON \nof ~:: .. -~1: ~1: 1  1  ~ ~: O=\n ~:r .052 :\n~~~ 1\n~ r~ :\n~\n~  1.=\n~r\n:  ~  L J'i/ ...,::: 725 .ALT AGCY 725  I ::\n:~~\n725 725 'A=L:-T- A,G CY ................ J2.5. A~TA.\u0026lt; 3-~Y.J\nTotal Elem Total Middle Total High Total Sec Total District ALT AGCY Grand Total 97 99 4377 4356 208 232 12 11 33 38 1828 1985 64 81 5 8 46 47 2422 2367 82 73 4 5 79 85 4250 4352 146 154 9 13 176 184 8627 8708 354 386 21 24 0 0 32 50 0 0 0 0 176 184 8659 8758 354 386 21 24 81 1728 1714 739 721 68% 69% 1033 978 1051i41as 2011 1251 \nos1f6 8% 1772 1699 12s5siaso2 fa471 F~i 12559: 68% 3500 3413 j~jsjf17.jj~]i~1:j 1145 253~\nr68 % 22 28 132}82 j5o fo 132 62% 3522 3441 25525 h 1411 I 6963 (1145  25525 68 % \u0026amp;7i!3 ~#,\n,, (,~~ /~8~1 l_, (f,_:~c-~ .~. 1\n,.,c.?J-P3. + Jo ~/ ~ a?\nSf-f._,1V-f\"P, ~ 74,3-- _i,(,,3- C:te~ /a:?,8 \"Ja-, ~ :, JY~P~ Cl . f_L~l-'(~~J-~~ ~~7~ \\ --\nI l'i~~ e,913 //-,S ~)\n$73 ,\u0026lt;t F\"e// -iL PJ-P~ ..\n,. ~D ~I ? ~\u0026amp;' 17t~t ~I 9\n-y' ~I$)- ,=\n\u0026gt;5,-l\u0026amp;I v'1o W( Q)I BT IBI ILIITTILJEI B( O)CI[C IPlUifIfLi I IC C~ CC1 BI COI)L  ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 2700 POPLAR STREET December 12, 2000 Memo To: Melissa Guildin, Office of Desegregation Monitoring From: ,dj'Zt Bobby J. Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation Subject: Requested Information This memo is in response to your recent request concerning school building capacities and plans for facility improvements or construction. We are enclosing a copy of school building capacities and a memo from Jerry Massey, Director of Plant Services, explaining the plans for facility improvements and construction. AN EQlJAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER [Z--~ ltL~~l From_:. .J~ez::.:.,__ __ _ Return D Keepo rT ossu JI' 1P oet-ll\"7688CC!M19 93 P. 0. BOX 687, NORTH LITTLE ROCK, AR 72115/0687 501/771-8000 North Little Rock School District School Building Capacities 2000-2001 Buildiag Qag\nu.i~ Buildiag ~agai:.i~ ~ Witb e~utable WiU]QUet Qttable Amboy 406 - Belwood 188 Boone Park 473 Crestvvood 318 Glenview 229 Indian Hills 426 Lakewood 254 Lynch Drive 506 Meadow Park 205 .-i,ee,~ North Heights 509 Park Hill 282 -ffl7I' Piv\"' 11\n,, 372 ( Redwood J /~ - ::,evemn :::,creet 429 Lakewood Middle 598 - Poplar Street Middle ' 814 Ridgeroad Middle 641 Rose City Middle 457 Argenta Academy 175 NLRHS-East Campus 1299 NLRHS-West Campus 1300 12/15/2000 14:54 501-324-2281 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 501 SHERMAN STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72202 TO: FROM: Mrs. Melissa Gulden Junious Babbs 1 SUBJECT:  Building Capacities DATE: December 15, 2000 LR SD SRO PAGE 01/02 OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Junious C. Babbs, Associate Superintendent Phone: (501) 324-2272 E-Mail: jcbabbs@stuasn.lrsd,kl2.ar. us Please note attached information regarding your request for '00-01 building capacities. Sony for delay in this response. Adopted attendance zone boundary changes ('99-00) and the school transition piece, resulting in realignment / redistribution of grade levels between elementary, middle and high schools have resulted in numbers being altered. These factors include school or program modifications, renovation, portable addition / removal and/ or utilization rate that is factored. Recent approval of the May 9th Special School Millage Election has prompted additional monies in recommended repairs, renovations and additions that will result in future adjustments and revision. Exact tiroelines are now being established to project scheduled work over the ne,rt three to five years. I hope t.o keep your informed throughout the process and ask if questions come up, please feel free to give me a call. ______________________________ _. 12/15/2000 14:54 501-324-2281 LR SD SRO PAGE 02/02 Little Roc:k Schoo/ Dlatrict 2000.2001 Cspac/tles 2000-2001 Cepecitles SCHOOL Caoacl~ Genta/HS 2200 Fa/rHS 1200 Hal/HS 1300 includes portables McC/ell/lHn S 1440 includes annex P~ II~ HS 1200 Sub-Total 7340 750 DunbsMr iddle 780 FClffl$Ht eightMs iddle 780 HendersOMfild dle 960 M8belvBMleid dle 600 MllMM/ddle 900 Pu/sskHi el{ll1l1M1 iddle 750 SouttMreMs1ld dle 750 FllirPri 304 ForwPtlrli 400 F1anidin 532 Fu/bright 491 Geyer~ngs 358 Gibb$ 321 Jefferson 471 King 715 McDennott 453 MHdowc:liff 358 Mltch6/I 283 Otter Cr8ek 415 PulaskHi e/a/71s 350 Riams911 296 Rockefeller 481  P1 - 5th Grade t-::Rc--om-lne:-------+--.a=t3 :[:\n:\n:,.-.-,ce-/:d---_------++--_--=\n--19~\n:,\n~tJ:: e:\"\n~les Washington 678 WesternH ills 320 WilliBms 4.90 WIISOII 340 Wooctuff 314 12/151CO ( fiLE:D U. S. OISTrtl:\nT COURT OCT 15 1987 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT . . EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS C~L[RK WESTERN DIVISION By:~ -r----------,,_..,..:..,.., \"\"\"'r:'\",\"1= - ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al DEFENDANTS ORDER Pursuant to the oral order issued from the bench on October 9, 1987, it is hereby adjudged that Aubrey Mccutcheon serve as master in this case in order to insure compliance with the mandate of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. The conditions requiring this appointment are set out below. The filling of magnet school seats continues to be unsettled. I have previously approved making the racial ratio for the magnets more flexible, that is, permitting a black percentage of 50-55% rather than exactly 50%. The Little Rock School District (LRSD), in accordance with recorrrnendations of the Citizens' Comnittee, will use magnet vacancies to improve racial balance in the nine schools which are outside the balance guidelines set by the Court of Appeals. The LRSD has asked that these transfers to magnets be effective November 9, 1987. I have no objection to the November 9 date. I would ask that the master be imnediately apprised of the effect of the student transfers. . . '\n,\",. .,...,.. . . ~ \\, \" --~---~-~.- _ _J ( Measures other than the use of magnet seats must be explored ( in 6rder to deal with the schools whose black student populations exceed that which is permitted under the mandate. The Citizens' Corrrnittee has reconmended that the LRSD's entire student assignment plan be refined, changed, or discarded. This appears to be the most pressing assignment for the Master. The destablizing effect of yet another \"new\" student assignment plan  suggests to me that the 1988-89 student assignment plan may indeed be this school district's last bite at the apple of quality desegregated public schools. In short, the student assignment plan must be workable both in design and imp l emen tat i_on. Accordingly, I have appointed Aubrey Mccutcheon to serve as Master to assure compliance with the mandate of the Court of Appeals. Mr. Mccutcheon has played a key role in truly successful desegregation plans, that is, plans which improve schools in both quality and racial balance. I am convinced that such a plan is possible in Little Rock, Arkansas and I am confident that Aubrey McCutcheon's guidance as Master will make the difference in devising and implementing that plan. Mr. Mccutcheon has served (and currently is serving) as an attorney for school districts under federal desegregation orders. He has served as a deputy superintendent of a large metropolitan school district in the midst of a desegregation plan. He is an experienced educator and desegregation lawyer who is familiar with what works for children as opposed to what works - 2 - ' . ,,.- .. ( ( in theory only. The Master appointed herein shall be invested with the full range of powers allowable under Rule 53, Fed. R. Civ. P. IT IS SO ORDERED this -7-day of October, 1987. - 3 - N0V-21-T00U E0 3:46P M FAXN O. c- SCHOOL CAPACITY INFORMATION PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT AUGUST 18, 2000 HIGH SCHOOL SCHOOL CAPACITY Jacksonville 1025 Mills 780 North Pulaski 900 Oak Grove Jr./Sr. 935 Robinson 506 Sylvan Hills 998 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS SCHOOb CAPAC[[Y Fuller Jacksonville Middle Jacksonville Junior High Northwood Junior Robinson (2rooms devided)'( Alpha Academy ~ Sylvan Hills ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SCHOOL CAPACIIY Adkins 370 Arnold Drive 420 Baker 330 Bates 800 Bayou Meto 660 Cato 576 Clinton 833 College Station 340 Crystal Hill 820 Dupree 465 fulfer -5 Harris 525 Jacksonville 785 Landmark 568 Lawson 325 Oak Grove 476 Oakbrooke 500 Pine Forest 556 Pinewood 523 Robinson 450 Scott 280 Sherwood 460 Sylvan Hills 456 Murrell Taylor 450 ?~\u0026lt;if Tolleson 570 I?-, I P. 02 7-, qo~ NOV-21-T0U0 E0 3:46P M FAXN O. P. 01 ... j '  Pulaski County Special School District Date: f I }/1'1 loD I ' Time: -------- To:~C 7~o~ From: ~b~-~i---04 1:-.\n._[J_fJ FAX COVER Number of Pages: (including cover sheet) cQ P.O. Box 8601  Little Rock, Arkansas 72216-86D1 925 East Dixon Rd. (501) 490-2000  http://pcssdweb.k12.ar.us LEA #60-02-050 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 57 01 55 02 62 03 58 04 61 05 66 SCHOOL 359 TOTALS EXCLUDE 302 GRD K/J PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2' 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: WHITE BLACK M F M F 5 6 20 25 9 8 23 15 9 9 18 23 13 9 20 14 13 13 161119 13 ,,1.e 9 21\n}: 21 62 54 118 117 32.3% 65.5% 57 48 98 92 34.8% 62.9% GRADE SPAN: HISPANIC ASIAN/PI M F M F 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 i 1 0 0 5 3 0 0 t,57-- 2. 2% .0% 4 3 0 0 2.3% .0% OCT2 3 'lOOO OfflCEOt WEGREG1O'1N\\0\\lNO R\\NG AMBOY ELEMENTARY K-05 AM IND/ALS NAT M F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 0 0 .0% LEA #60-02-058 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 44 01 42 02 42 03 41 04 47 05 45 SCHOOL 261 TOTALS EXCLUDE 217 GRD K/J PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT M F M F M F M F M F 18 10 7 7 1 0 1 0 0 0 13 10 7 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 13 8 0 0 0 1 0 0 11 9 7 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 11 11 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 ~? 10 11 :'?) 14 0 1, 0 0 0 0 0 75\\ 60 56\\?-: 67 1 0 1 1 0 0 51. 7% 47 .1% ~11, . 4% .8% .0% 57 50 49 60 0 0 0 1 0 0 49.3% 50.2% .0% .5% .0% ~-------------- -- -- -- ---- PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-054 OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT GRADE TOTAL M F M F M F M F M F :\n- 13.,, 11711 J 34 0 2 18 1 0 0 0 0 0 K 84 6 3 32 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 70 3 3 28 35 0 1 0 0 0 0 02 65 4 2 28 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 68 4 3 37 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 73 0 )l 8 26 ~39 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 51 0 1 25}..o 24 1 j- 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL 445 17 22 189 214 2 1 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 8.8% 90. 6%- f/'l- . 7 %- . 0 %- . 0 %- EXCLUDE 327 11 17 144 153 1 1 0 0 0 0 GRD K/J 8. 6%- 90. 8%- . 6 %- . 0 %- . 0 %- ~---------- ----- - PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-069 OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: SEVENTH STREET ELEM. GRADE SPAN: K-05 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT GRADE TOTAL M F M F M F M F M F K 54 1 1 26 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 53 2 0 17 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 68 3 3 35 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 50 6 4 22 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 43 2 3 15 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 47 6 ?P 2 17,22 0 l) 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL 315 20 13 132 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 10.5% 89.5% 1f)1 .0% .0% .0% EXCLUDE 261 19 12 106 124 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRD K/J 11.9% 88.1% .0% .0% .0% LEA #60-02-060 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 01 02 03 04 05 59 65 74 71 59 53 SCHOOL 381 TOTALS EXCLUDE 322 GRD K/J PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: LYNCH DRIVE ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 WHITE M F 8 5 7 7 15 8 9 11 2 6 4 i~ 7 45 44 23.4% 37 39 23.6% BLACK M F 29 16 20 31 26 25 23 26 25 :,26 23~1) 19 146 143 75.9% 117 127 75.8% HISPANIC M F 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 ~ , ~ 1t..,1, . 8% 1 1 .6% ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT M F M F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,-  0 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-061 OCTOBER 2' 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT GRADE TOTAL M F M F M F M F M F K 23 4 3 7 7 0 0 1 0 1 0 01 24 6 3 9 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 34 7 3 11 11 0 0 0 0 1 1 03 28 3 6 9 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 04 33 2 2 16 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 41 2 ~{p 5 16 JD 16 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 SCHOOL 183 24 22 681 62 1 1 1 1 2 1 TOTALS 25.1% 71.0% 117, 1.1% 1.1% 1.6% EXCLUDE 160 20 19 61 55 1 1 0 1 1 1 GRD K/J 24.4% 72.5% 1.3% .6% 1.3% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-063 OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: NORTH HEIGHTS ELEM. GRADE SPAN: K-05 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT GRADE TOTAL M F M F M F M F M F K 73 13 11 22 20 4 3 0 0 0 0 01 71 20 10 16 13 5 5 0 1 1 0 02 75 10 16 19 21 8 1 0 0 0 0 03 83 16 18 19 24 4 1 0 0 1 0 04 81 17 10 16 25 7 6 0 0 0 0 05 64 9#~12 19 b11 91.P 4 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL 447 85 77 111~114 ~ 37 20 0 1 2 0 TOTALS 36.2% 50.3% J\"  12.8% .2% .4% EXCLUDE 374 72 66 89 94 33 17 0 1 2 0 GRD K/J 36.9% 48.9% 13. 4% .3% .5% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-055 OCTOBER 2' 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT GRADE TOTAL M F M F M F M F M F K 54 20 15 8 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 61 18 16 15 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 60 21 20 8 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 52 17 13 12 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 51 17 18 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 45 11 0 '/16 9 ,\\ 9 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL 323 104, 98 60 \\ 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 62.5% 37.5% J11\" . 0% .0% .0% EXCLUDE 269 84 83 52 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRD K/J 62.1% 37.9% 0~  0 .0% .0% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-064 OCTOBER 2' 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: PARK HILL ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT GRADE TOTAL M F M F M F M F M F K 32 4 6 8 12 1 0 0 0 0 1 01 29 6 6 11 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 36 7 6 10 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 03 46 8 10 14 12 1 1 0 0 0 0 04 35 4 8 11 11 0 1 0 0 0 0 05 48 11'611.0. t. ue,'~13 0 '3 1 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL 226 40 46 67 65 ~~1-4 3 0 0 0 1 TOTALS 38.1% 58.4% 3.1% .0% .4% EXCLUDE 194 36 40 59 53 3 3 0 0 0 0 GRD K/J 39.2% 57.7% 3.1% .0% .0% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-065 OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT GRADE TOTAL M F M F M F M F M F K 61. 01 62 02 59 03 51 04 63 05 64 SCHOOL 360 TOTALS EXCLUDE 299 GRD K/J 11 9 18 22 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 20 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 7 1. 9 22 0 1 0 0 0 0 9 11 14 15 1 1 0 0 0 0 14 1.1 27 A 7 1 0 1 0 1 1 10 ,i 16 24? 14 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 64\\ 64 122 102 t.~1-3 2 1. 0 1 1. 35.6% 62.2% 1.4% . 3% .6% 53 55 1.04 80 2 2 1 0 1 1 36.1% 61.5% 1. 3% .3% .7% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-053 OCTOBER 2' 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: BELWOOD ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT GRADE TOTAL M F M F M F M F M F K 27 5 4 10 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 23 3 7 7 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 02 33 14 4 6 7 0 2 0 0 0 0 03 22 4 8 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 27 5 10 3 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 05 13 4 1 3 ~5 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 06 1 1 ,tO 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL 146 36 34 36 36 ~91 1 3 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 47.9% 49.3% 2. 7% .0% .0% EXCLUDE 119 31 30 26 28 1 3 0 0 0 0 GRD K/J 51.3% 45.4% 3.4% Og,.  0 .0% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-056 OCTOBER 2' 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT GRADE TOTAL M F M F M F M F M F K 17 1 2 8 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 21 0 3 11 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 31 4 3 14 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 25 3 2 14 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 31 0 0 17 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 31 3 'J,.'?2J 13f/'13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SCHOOL 156 11 12 77 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 14.7% 85.3% \u0026lt;-p7 .0% .0% .0% EXCLUDE 139 10 10 69 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 GRD K/J 14.4% 85.6% .0% .0% .0% LEA #60-02-057 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: INDIAN HILLS ELEM. GRADE SPAN: K-05 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT GRADE TOTAL M F M F M F M F M F K 68 21 24 11 10 0 0 2 0 0 0 01 71 27 22 10 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 02 72 24 26 9 11 0 0 1 l 0 0 03 64 21 23 7 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 71 18 26 10 15 1 0 0 0 l 0 05 59 18~:\\ 17 ll~ 10 0 ,o 0 0 2 0 l SCHOOL 405 129 138 58 70 2 0 3 3 1 l TOTALS 65.9% 31.6% p?o .5% 1.5% .5% EXCLUDE 337 108 114 47 60 2 0 1 3 l 1 GRD K/J 65.9% 31.8% .6% 1. 2% .6% LEA #60-02-067 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL J 130 K 16 SCHOOL 146 TOTALS EXCLUDE 0 GRD K/J PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: REDWOOD PRE-SCHOOL GRADE SPAN: K-05 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT M F M F M F '8'17 M F M F ,o ,,~ -4 4 6 58 58 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 1\\ 1 7 19\\ 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 7 65 66 2 2 0 0 0 0 7.5% 89. 7% ~o7 2.7% .0% .0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0% .0% .0% O!l-  0 O!l-  0 ELEMENTARY WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT TOTALS M \u0026gt;\\DF'\\ M f6F M F M F M F h ).,ti\u0026gt; 1\\~ ELEM 4153 716 691 1305 1323 60 36 6 6 6 4 WITH K 33.9% 63.3% t,'1' 2.3% .3% .2% ELEM 3320 595 583 1021 1026 48 31 2 6 5 3 W/0 K/J 35.5% 61.7% 2.4% .2% .2% LEA #60-02-076 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: NLRHS-WEST CAMPUS GRADE SPAN: 11-12 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT GRADE TOTAL M F M F M F M F M F 09 23 3 1 7 9 2 1 0 0 0 0 10 120 19 11 50 35 3 2 0 0 0 0 11 588 153 145 120 149 5 8 1 4 1 2 12 514 137 133 103 129 2 5 1 4 0 0 SCHOOL 1245 312 290 280 322 12 16 2 8 1 2 TOTALS 48.4% 48.4% 2.2% .8% 2 9-  0 l,() 'Y l.toY \u0026gt;l \\ Ji'67,. LEA #60-02-075 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: NLRHS-EAST CAMPUS GRADE SPAN: 09-10 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT GRADE TOTAL M F M F M F M F M F 09 669 158 165 162 167 5 8 2 2 0 0 10 687 156 159 165 197 6 3 0 l 0 0 SCHOOL 1356 314 324 327 364 ll ll 2 3 0 0 TOTALS 47.1% 51.0% 1.6% .4% .0% ,.,~~ \u0026lt;,I\\ ~1 jlt\" LEA #60-02-076 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 06 13 07 6 08 27 09 57 10 40 11 17 12 11 SCHOOL 171 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: ARGENTA ACADEMY GRADE SPAN: 7-12 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT M F M F M F M F M F 1 0 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 5 28 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 26 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 5 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 9 92 44 0 1 0 0 0 0 19.9% 79.5% .6% .0% .0% ~4 ,i4 ie1 LEA #60-02- COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 09 2 10 6 11 16 12 4 SCHOOL 28 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: SHORTER NOW GRADE SPAN: 7-12 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS M F M F M F M F M F 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 11 8 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 53.6% 42.9% 3.6% .0% .0% /? f?' _\n/?.1. 1 NAT LEA #60-02-072 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 07 267 08 245 SCHOOL 512 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: RIDGEROAD GRADE SPAN: 07-08 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS M F M F M F M F M F 42 37 90 89 6 2 0 0 0 1 40 47 80 70 3 4 1 0 0 0 82 84 170 159 9 6 1 0 0 1 32.4% 64.3% 2.9% .2% 2 !!,,  a ,i~ .??-9 ,1 \u0026amp;~7 NAT LEA #60-02-070 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 07 259 08 216 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: LAKEWOOD GRADE SPAN: 07-08 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS M F M F M F M F M F 83 92 46 35 2 1 0 0 0 0 69 61 43 42 0 0 0 0 0 1 SCHOOL 475 152 153 89 77 2 1 0 0 0 1 .2% TOTALS 64.2% 34.9% .6% .0% Jo? ,tt4 1 jl/??o NAT LEA #60-02-077 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 06 1 07 124 08 122 09 5 10 1 SCHOOL 253 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: ROSE CITY GRADE SPAN: 07-08 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS M F M F M F M F M F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 14 42 50 1 1 0 0 0 0 12 24 48 36 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 39 94 87 1 3 0 0 0 0 26.9% 71.5% 1.6% .0% .0% (qi ,~, 1 ~~o NAT LEA #60-02-059 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: POPLAR ST MIDDLE GRADE SPAN: 06 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT GRADE TOTAL M F M F M F M F M F 06 643 125 116 209 179 7 5 1 1 0 0 SCHOOL 643 125 116 209 179 7 5 1 1 0 0 TOTALS 37.5% 60.3% 1.9% .3% .0% ~4\\ :,i~ ,\u0026gt;/ ~o7 SECONDARY WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT TOTALS M F M F M F M F M F SEC 4683 1043 1026 1269 1236 43 43 6 12 l 4 44.2% 53.5% 1.8% . 4% .1% ,?,ol, ~\n?.~r\u0026gt;? 109 ~~7 I ---------- DISTRICT WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT TOTALS M F M F M F M F M F 8836 1759 1717 2574 2559 103 79 12 18 7 8 39.3% 58.1% 2.1% 3 g.  0 . 2% W/0 8003 1638 1609 2290 2262 91 74 8 18 6 7 GRD J/K 40.6% 56.9% 2.1% .3% .2% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY GRADE , LEA #60-02-000 OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK GRADE SPAN: PK-12 WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/PI AM IND/ALS NAT GRADE TOTAL M F M F M ~ F M F M F 4 #\" 8 71 ,~ 176 '70(1 J 164 3 2 0 0 0 0 K 669 117 100 213 221 9 3 4 0 1 1 01 647 124 105 194 209 7 6 0 1 1 0 02 711 138 117 216 218 11 6 1 2 1 1 03 659 124 127 205 188 9 5 0 0 1 0 04 675 107 126 201 220 9 8 1 0 2 1 05 627 101 108 205 191 12 6 0 3 0 1 06 658 127 117 219 181 7 5 1 1 0 0 07 656 143 143 180 176 9 4 0 0 0 1 08 610 127 134 187 151 3 6 1 0 0 1 09 756 173 172 201 190 7 9 2 2 0 0 10 854 180 173 242 243 9 6 I 0 1 0 0 11 621 157 153 129 160 6 8 1 4 1 2 12 529 137 134 111 135 2 5 1 4 0 0 EX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8836 1759 1717 2574 2559 103 79 12 18 7 8 :.4'71., ,.,?\"\u0026gt; 1?~1 ~1\" -~f /9 I~ I \u0026lt;g,io~ ~1~/ \u0026lt;:9/~d c\n\u0026gt;\nlt, 'i-/4 LEA #60-02-050 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 57 01 55 02 62 03 58 04 61 05 66 SCHOOL 359 TOTALS GRADES 3 02 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: AMBOY ELEMENTARY SCHOO GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK e E\\\\JE 12 45 17 38 QC1 2 i 1\\1\\1\\1 21 41 Go~f\\~~:o tt\\10\\\\\\\\\\G 24 34 Ot~tlti~ 26 35 24 42 124 235 34.5% 65.5% 112 190 37.1% 62.9% LEA #60-02-058 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 44 01 42 02 42 03 41 04 47 05 45 SCHOOL 261 TOTALS GRADES 217 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY SC GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 30 14 23 19 21 21 20 21 24 23 20 25 138 123 52.9% 47.1% 108 109 49.8% 50.2% LEA #60-02-054 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL J 34 K 84 01 70 02 65 03 68 04 73 05 51 SCHOOL 445 TOTALS GRADES 327 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 3 31 9 75 7 63 6 59 7 61 8 65 2 49 42 403 9.4% 90.6% 30 297 9.2% 90.8% LEA #60-02-069 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 54 01 53 02 68 03 50 04 43 05 47 SCHOOL 315 TOTALS GRADES 261 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: SEVENTH STREET ELEMENT GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 2 52 2 51 6 62 10 40 5 38 8 39 33 282 10.5% 89.5% 31 230 11.9% 88.1% LEA #60-02-060 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 59 01 65 02 74 03 71 04 59 05 53 SCHOOL 381 TOTALS GRADES 322 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: LYNCH DRIVE ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 14 45 14 51 23 51 22 49 8 51 11 42 92 289 24.1% 75.9% 78 244 24.2% 75.8% LEA #60-02-061 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 23 01 24 02 34 03 28 04 33 05 41 SCHOOL 183 TOTALS GRADES 160 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 9 14 9 15 12 22 10 18 4 29 9 32 53 130 29.0% 71.0% 44 116 27.5% 72. 5% LEA #60-02-050 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 73 01 71 02 75 03 83 04 81 05 64 SCHOOL 447 TOTALS GRADES 374 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTA GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 31 42 42 29 35 40 40 43 40 41 34 30 222 225 49.7% 50.3% 191 183 51.1% 48.9% LEA #60-02-055 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 54 01 61 02 60 03 52 04 51 05 45 SCHOOL 323 TOTALS GRADES 269 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY S GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 35 19 34 27 41 19 30 22 35 16 27 18 202 121 62.5% 37.5% 167 102 62.1% 37.9% LEA #60-02-064 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 32 01 29 02 36 03 46 04 35 05 48 SCHOOL 226 TOTALS GRADES 194 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: PARK HILL ELEMENTARY S GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 12 20 12 17 15 21 20 26 13 22 22 26 94 132 41.6% 58.4% 82 112 42.3% 57.7% LEA #60-02-065 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 61 01 62 02 59 03 51 04 63 05 64 SCHOOL 360 TOTALS GRADES 299 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY S GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 21 40 20 42 18 41 22 29 29 34 26 38 136 224 37.8% 62.2% 115 184 38.5% 61.5% LEA #60-02-053 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 27 01 23 02 33 03 22 04 27 05 13 06 1 SCHOOL 146 TOTALS GRADES 119 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: BELWOOD ELEMENTARY SCH GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 9 18 11 12 20 13 12 10 16 11 5 8 1 0 74 72 50.7% 49.3% 65 54 54.6% 45.4% LEA #60-02-056 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 17 01 21 02 31 03 25 04 31 05 31 SCHOOL 156 TOTALS GRADES 139 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY SC GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 3 14 3 18 7 24 5 20 0 31 5 26 23 133 14.7% 85.3% 20 119 14.4% 85.6% LEA #60-02-057 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 68 01 71 02 72 03 64 04 71 05 59 SCHOOL 405 TOTALS GRADES 337 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: INDIAN HILLS ELEMENTAR GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 47 21 50 21 52 20 44 20 46 25 38 21 277 128 68.4% 31.6% 230 107 68.2% 31.8% LEA #60-02-067 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL J 130 K 16 SCHOOL 146 TOTALS GRADES 0 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: REDWOOD PRE-SCHOOL GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 14 116 1 15 15 131 10.3% 89.7% 0 0 .0% .0% ELEMENTARY NON-BLACK BLACK TOTALS ELEM 4153 1525 2628 WITH K 36.7% 63.3% ELEM 3320 1273 2047 01-05 38.3% 61.7% LEA #60-02-076 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 09 23 10 120 11 588 12 514 SCHOOL 1245 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: NORTH LITTLE ROCK HIGH GRADE SPAN: 11-12 NON-BLACK BLACK 7 16 35 85 319 269 282 232 643 602 51.6% 48.4% LEA #60-02-075 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 09 10 669 687 SCHOOL 1356 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: NORTH LITTLE ROCK HIGH GRADE SPAN: 09-10 NON-BLACK 340 325 665 49.0% BLACK 329 362 691 51.0% LEA #60-02-076 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 06 13 07 6 08 27 09 57 10 40 11 17 12 11 SCHOOL 171 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: ARGENTA ACADEMY GRADE SPAN: 7-12 NON-BLACK BLACK 1 12 2 4 8 19 16 41 5 35 2 15 1 10 35 136 20.5% 79.5% LEA #60-02- COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 09 2 10 6 11 16 12 4 SCHOOL 28 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: ARGENTA-SHORTER NOW GRADE SPAN: 7-12 NON-BLACK BLACK 1 1 4 2 11 5 0 4 16 12 57.1% 42.9% LEA #60-02-072 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 07 267 08 245 SCHOOL 512 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: RIDGEROAD MIDDLE SCHOO GRADE SPAN: 07-08 NON-BLACK 88 95 183 35. 7% BLACK 179 150 329 64.3% LEA #60-02-070 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 07 259 08 216 SCHOOL 475 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: LAKEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADE SPAN: 07-08 NON-BLACK 178 131 309 65.1% BLACK 81 85 166 34.9% LEA #60-02-077 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 06 1 07 124 08 122 09 5 10 1 SCHOOL 253 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: ROSE CITY MIDDLE SCHOO GRADE SPAN: 07-08 NON-BLACK BLACK 1 0 32 92 38 84 1 4 0 1 72 181 28.5% 71.5% LEA #60-02-059 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 06 643 SCHOOL 643 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 2, 2000 CURRENT SCHOOL ASSIGNMENTS DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: POPLAR STREET MIDDLES NON-BLACK 255 255 39.7% BLACK 388 388 60.3% GRADE SPAN: 06 .__ _________ - ----- SECONDARY TOTALS SEC 4683 NON-BLACK 2178 46.5% '---------------- BLACK 2505 53.5% DISTRICT NON-BLACK BLACK TOTALS 8836 3703 5133 41.9% 58.1% W/O 8003 3451 4552 GR K\u0026amp;J 43.1% 56.9% M(D)JETIBIL IITTIL~ JE(D)CClfFil:1 IJiffiILIICCC CIBI@@IL ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES October 20, 2000 Ms. Melissa Guldin Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 E. Markham, Suite 501 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ms. Guldin: 2700 POPLAR STREET RECE\\\"E QC,' 2~. 2000 Ofr\\COtr lllQ OtStG\\\\t~\\\\OII0\\\\\\ \\\\10W Enclosed please find the October 1, 2000 report from the North Little Rock School District. Please call me if you have any questions. Francical J. Jackson, Director of Student Affairs Enclosures AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER P.O. BOX 687, NORTH LITTLE ROCK, AR 72115/0687 501/771-8000 NOV-15-W00E 0D9 :29A M FAXN O, P. 03 Pulaski County Special School District Enrollment Count for October 1, 2000 WHITE BLACK OTHER GRADE SCHOOUGRADE WM WF BM BF OM OF TOTAL IAd~ins Elem~ntary J PK .. 0 4 8 8 0 0 20 K 10 8 12 16 0 1 47 1 12 9 11 8 1 0 41 2 13 8 9 12 1 0 43 3 8 12 10 7 0 0 37 4 14 13 13 7 0 0 47 5 12 7 8 4 0 0 31 School Totat 69 61 , 71 62 2 1 2661 leaker lnterdistrict.. , K 17 19 2 2 0 0 40 1 25 13 3 4 0 0 45 2 23 19 3 4 0 0 49 3 26 19 2 1 0 0 48 4 16 12 5 4 0 0 37 5 16 19 5 7 0 0 47 6 23 22 3 5 0 0 53 School Total 146 123 23 27 0 0 319! Crystal Hill Magnet .  PK 15 9 13 16 1 0 54 K 25 30 19 24 0 0 98 1 32 22 29 21 0 0 104 2 28 18 28 20 0 0 94 3 29 24 19 22 0 0 94 4 34 20 23 33 0 0 110 5 27 28 30 21 3 0 109 6 :25 30 21 15 1 1 93 chool total 215 1B1  182 172 5 1 756] . Bayou Melo Elemetita!l'. K 46 27 0 1 2 0 76 1 35 45 1 0 1 0 82 2 33 43 1 1 0 1 79 3 38 45 1 0 1 3 88 4 41 35 2 0 1 0 79 5 38 42 3 2 1 2 88 6 32 29 0 3 0 0 64 , ~chool Total 263,' 266 8 ,7 6 6. 5561 Page 1 of 10 Date: 11/09/2000 NOV-15-W00E 0D9 :29A M FAXN O. P. 04 Pulaski County Special School District Enrollment Count for October 1, 2000 WHITE BLACK OTHER GRADE SCHOOL/GRADE WM WF BM BF OM OF TOTAL Clinton Magnet School . 1 PK 21 18 12 17 0 4 72 K 21 22 24 13 1 0 81 1 21 21 22 21 6 3 94 2 17 31 25 29 2 0 104 3 18 27 16 25 2 1 89 4 29 24 27 32 0 0 112 5 20 20 20 25 4 0 89 6 21 16 19 25 2 2 85 School Total 168 : 179 165 187 17, 10 7261 Dupree Elementa~ : I K 26 15 5 6 0 0 52 1 12 18 9 8 1 2 50 2 11 17 7 8 3 3 49 3 29 17 11 8 0 2 67 4 10 23 7 6 4 0 50 5 13 18 7 8 1 1 48 School Total -101 108 46 44,' g 8 3161 C: .Harris Elementary ] K 6 2 6 5 0 0 19 1 7 2 8 10 1 0 28 2 11 6 14 4 0 1 36 3 4 5 8 12 0 0 29 4 9 8 14 14 2 1 48 5 8 5 15 7 1 0 36 6 7 9 8 10 0 1 35 School Total 52 37 73 62 4 3 231f Jacksonville Elementary K 30 23 30 23 0 0 106 1 26 23 20 25 0 0 94 2 16 17 22 31 1 1 8S 3 23 21 31 24 0 0 99 4 16 21 28 19 0 1 85 5 22 19 25 24 0 0 90 School Total ~33 .  124 156  146 1 2 5621 Pago 2 of 10 Date: 11/09/2000 NOV-15-W00E 0D9 :29A M FAXN O. P. 05 Pulaski County Special School District Enrollment Count for October 1, 2000 WHITE BLACK OTHER GRADE SCHOOUGRADE WM WF BM BF OM OF TOTAL   . Landmark Elementary PK 8 8 5 9 0 0 30 K 11 7 10 10 0 1 39 1 18 10 13 10 1 0 52 2 15 11 9 9 1 0 45 3 15 21 10 16 0 1 63 4 17 15 14 18 1 1 66 6 18 19 14 12 1 1. 65 6 15 18 15 12 0 0 60 C School Total 117 109 90 96' 4 4 420! Lawso.n Element.ary :1 K 20 16 5 4 0 0 45 1 17 14 0 1 0 0 32 2 11 10 4 4 0 0 29 3 22 13 3 4 0 0 42 4 15 14 4 3 0 0 36 5 21 18 7 4 0 0 50 6 14 11 1 2 0 0 28 School Total 120 96 24 22 0 0 262! Tolleson Elementary K 26 18 5 8 2 1 60 1 24 21 4 8 1 1 59 2 20 20 9 8 5 3 65 3 21 23 8 9 0 1 62 4 22 16 7 6 3 3 57 5 22 15 11 4 1 2 55 6 14 24 10 4 2 1 55 SchQoi Total 149 137 54 47 14 12  .. 1.3! Oak Grove Elementary : I PK* 22 30 12 5 2 0 71 K 20 15 6 5 0 0 46 1 16 21 5 5 2 1 50 2 15 18 3 8 1 0 45 3 15 21 5 7 1 0 49 4 28 16 7 7 0 0 58 5 18 22 8 6 1 0 55 6 16 20 4 6 3 0 49 :, , School Total 150 163 50 I D 10 1 4231 Page 3of 10 Date: 11/09/2000 NOV-15-W00E 0D9 :30A M FAXN O. P. 06 Pulaski County Special School District Enrollment Count for October 1, 2000 WHITE BLACK OTHER GRADE SCHOOUGRAOE WM WF BM BF OM OF TOTAL Robinson Elementary.,  K 21 14 5 4 0 2 46 1 22 16 4 3 0 0 45 2 26 15 8 5 0 0 54 3 24 16 4 11 0 0 55 4 30 20 7 8 0 0 65 5 21 14 8 9 1 0 53 6 33 21 14 12 0 1 81 [ School Total 177. 116 50  52 1 31 399 Scott ~lementary School ] K 12 8 2 2 0 0 24 1 12 8 1 7 0 0 28 2 7 4 3 4 0 0 18 3 3 7 5 3 0 0 18 4 5 7 2 5 0 0 19 5 4 2 1 4 0 0 11 6 8 7 7 2 0 0 24 School Total 51 43 21 27, 0 0 1421 Sherwood Elernemtary, ] K 24 11 9 6 1 1 52 1 15 17 7 12 0 0 51 2 16 22 10 6 0 0 54 3 24 17 11 10 0 0 62 4 15 18 7 9 0 0 49 5 15 17 10 12 1 1 56 6 17 14 17 4 0 0 52 SchoolTo~I 126 116 71 5.9 2 2 3761 I\n:  S~lvan HIiis Elementary K 18 21 6 10 0 3 58 1 16 15 5 4 0 0 40 2 13 15 9 12 0 0 49 3 23 19 6 16 1 0 65 4 29 20 16 9 1 0 75 5 31 25 9 10 0 1 76 6 23 14 17 15 1 2 72 SchoolTotal 15~ 129 68 'ii 3 6 ~51 Page 4 of 10 Date: 11/09/2000 NOV-15-W00E 0D9 :30A M FAXN O. P. 07 Pulaski County Special School District Enrollment Count for October 1, 2000 WHITE BLACK OTHER GRADE SCHOOUGRADE WM WF BM BF OM OF TOTAL Jacksonville Middle School .1 6 93 100 75 65 2 1 336 7 92 107 59 72 2 3 33, School Total 185 207, 134  137\" 4 4  511.1 Jacksonville Jr High 8 107 97 77 67 0 1 349 9 103 95 76 80 0 0 354 School Total 210 192 . 1~3 147, 0 1 1-031 Fuller Jr ~if!h School. 7 56 56 64 53 0 2 231 8 75 57 57 50 1 1 241 9 75 64 66 55 2 1 263 'Sct,ool Total ,206 177 187 .158 3 4 7351 Sylvan Hills Jr ttigh. 7 113 81 61 54 5 1 315 8 104 73 51 61 4 3 296 9 98 98 56 46 0 2 302 School Total 315 .252 1'70 , 161 9 6 9131 C Jacksonville Sr High 10 105 102 56 52 2 2 319 11 100 98 47 61 0 7 313 12 77 69 42 48 2 1 239 School Total 28~ 269 . 145 , 161.' 4 10. 871) Mills niveralty High .. I 10 39 42 36 37 31 29 214 11 69 44 37 39 6 2 197 12 62 49 32 35 2 0 180 School Total 170 135 105. 111 '3$. 31 5911 Page 5 of 10 Date: 11/09/2000 NOV-15-W00E 0D9 :30A M FAXN O. P. 08 Pulaski County Special School District Enrollment Count for October 1, 2000 WHITE BLACK OTHER GRADE SCHOOUGRADE WM Wf BM BF OM OF TOTAL c:Oak Grove Jr/Sr High . I 7 45 51 13 27 0 0 136 8 61 41 21 20 2 0 145 9 70 60 19 26 3 1 179 10 63 56 17 21 2 2 161 11 50 54 18 10 1 1 134 12 38 34 7 13 1 0 93 C School Total 327 296 95 117 9 4 8481 [- ~obim\non Sr. Hi!ih 10 88 58 25 14 2 0 187 11 54 41 26 20 0 2 143 12 43 48 16 12 0 0 119 School Total 185 147 67 46 2 2 449J Sylvan Hills Sr High 10 111 96 33 44 0 0 284 11 97 83 39 32 0 0 251 12 64 62 21 30 0 0 177 Schoo 1 I Total 272 241 93 1Q6 0 C) r121 Catq Elementary K 28 21 9 8 0 0 66 1 34 26 5 9 2 3 79 2 20 22 8 12 1 2 65 3 37 17 10 12 2 1 79 4 27 23 11 7 1 1 70 5 27 25 12 7 0 0 71 6 28 27 14 12 0 0 81 [ : School Total  201 1,61 . 69 67 '. i 7 5111 Pinewood Elementary : ] K 32 19 15 10 3 0 79 1 18 18 15 11 2 0 64 2 27 17 11 14 0 0 69 3 24 23 8 14 0 2 71 4 18 18 15 19 3 0 73 5 15 20 14 13 0 0 62 'School Total 134 115 78 '81 8 2 4181 Page 6of 10 Date: 11109/2000 NOV-15-W00E 0D9 :30A M FAXN O. P, 09 Pulaski County Special School District Enrollment Count for October 1, 2000 WHITE BLACK OTHER GRADE SCHOOUGRAOE WM WF BM BF OM OF TOTAL    college Station Elementary  I K 5 2 1 2 0 0 10 1 2 0 6 4 0 0 12 2 2 1 5 5 0 0 13 3 12 5 9 17 0 1 44 4 17 8 9 12 1 1 48 5 16 21 5 6 2 1 51 6 13 21 8 5 1 1 49 School Total 67 58 43 51 4 4 221I ( Nort\" Pulaski 1:iigh 1 10 100 75 50 43 6 6 280 11 81 66 30 30 6 4 217 12 61 58 22 22 4 4 171 School Total 242 199 102 95 16 14\n668! Arnold Drive Elementa~ J K 35 23 7 10 2 1 78 1 32 24 4 6 3 5 74 2 27 23 12 4 1 2 69 3 21 20 9 8 3 3 64 4 27 14 8 6 1 4 60 s 9 15 6 8 3 2 43 6 24 9 9 7 2 1 52 School Total H5 128 55 49 15 18 4401 L Oakbrooke Elementary K 11 16 4 7 0 0 38 1 16 16 7 11 0 0 50 2 20 12 13 10 0 0 55 3 15 23 7 8 2 0 55 4 16 12 3 9 0 0 40 5 24 18 13 14 0 0 69 6 19 22 7 7 0 0 55 School Total 121 119 54 .66 2 i5 3s21 Northwooc\nJtr High 7 90 77 29 37 3 2 238 8 93 83 50 38 6 3 273 9 121 90 24 33 4 8 280 School Total ,304 250 '1Q3 108 n 13 .7911 Page 7 of 10 Date: 11/09(2000 NOV-15-W00E 0D9 :31A M FAXN O. P. 10 Pulaski County Special School District Enrollment Count for October 1, 2000 WHITE BLACK OTHER GRADE SCHOOUGRAOE WM WF BM BF OM OF TOTAL Murrell'.Taylor Elementary . :1 K 17 18 9 10 0 1 55 1 14 17 9 9 0 0 49 2 19 12 14 15 0 0 60 3 20 18 20 4 0 0 62 4 19 13 14 7 0 0 53 5 23 22 13 15 0 1 74 C School Total 112 100 ,79 60 O 2 3531 [ f:'ine For~st Elementari  K 22 20 10 6 0 1 59 1 23 24 2 7 1 1 58 2 26 11 9 3 0 1 50 3 36 30 5 6 0 4 81 4 26 26 5 6 2 0 65 5 32 31 14 7 2 1 87 6 32 19 11 5 4 2 73 . _ School Total 197 1'61 56 40 9 10 4731 Robinson Jr High 7 67 54 35 18 0 1 175 8 58 54 21 28 0 1 162 9 46 54 26 16 0 1 143 School Total 1-71 162 82 62 0 3 48ol Bates Elementary PK* 14 11 22 13 0 0 60 K 25 22 13 28 0 0 88 1 23 25 29 19 0 0 96 2 18 20 20 19 1 1 79 3 25 19 24 29 2 0 99 4 21 32 27 32 1 0 113 5 24 23 38 34 0 0 119 6 31 17 28 25 0 0 101 . Sct,ool Tot.ii 181 169 201 199 4 1 ' 7551 Page 8 of 10 Date: 11/09/2000 NOV-15-W00E 0D9 :31A M FAXN O. P. 11 Pulaski County Special School District Enrollment Count for October 1, 2000 WHITE BLACK OTHER GRADE SCHOOUGRADE WM WF BM BF OM OF TOTAL [ TOTAL DISTRICT ENROLL~INT I : Grade Total: PK\" 80 :so 72 68 ,,3 4 3071 K 508 397 214 220 11 12 1,362 1 472 425 219 223 22 16 1,377 2 434 392 256 247 17 15 1,361 3 512 462 242 273 14 19 1,522 4 501 428 275 278 21 12 1,515 5 476 465 296 263 22 13 1,535 6 488 450 288 241 18 13 1,498 Grade Totals: K  6 3,391 3,01~ 1,79Q 1\n745_ 125 100 10,1101 ~ - -  Eiamenta-fotai-\n. -  - 3Jrr-. jjiu. -im -LID-. ~.ur-3. ~. TliJii~ ------ __ 'I_ _______ ----~- -- ___ _.. -- -----~--- ---- -  7 464 427 264 263 10 9 1,437 8 503 406 279 266 13 9 1,476 9 533 466 282 260 10 13 1,564 [ Grade Totals: 7  9 1,500 1,2~9 825. 789 33 31 4,41-,1 10 515 432 221 216 44 40 1,468 11 458 389 202 197 13 17 1,276 12 353 327 150 168 9 5 1,012 'Grade Totals: 10 -12 1,326 1,148 573 '581 66 62: '3,7561 1 - -  -secondiryToT-aiS- .  - ~-Im. uia- Ui.b-:.-.- u. - i 3  -i2'13i ---~---~---~---~-----~-------~-~--------------- -  - -orstriciTotaT- s... .. - ... -. -  f4- - -. -~- -m --iii- -- ., I. -  -  -  - .. -  -  -  -  -  -  -~. -  - .. --~..\n.. -  -  -- -  -  -  ~I Page 10 of 10 Date: 11/09/2000 NOV-15-W00E 0D9 :29A M FAXN O. P. 02 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT November 13, 2000 Ann Brown.Marshall Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 E. Markham Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Dear Mrs. Brown-Marshall: 925 East Dixon Road/P.O. Box 8601 Little Ro~k. Arkansas 72216-8601 .. (501) 490-2000 Atlached is the October 1, 2000 enrollment counts for Pulaski County Special School District. The following schools are outside the racial balance guidelines: Adkjns Elementary - 52% Bak.er Elementary - 15% Bates Elementary - 54% Harris Elementary- 61 % Jacksonville Elementary- 54% Landmark Elementary - 45% Lawson Elementary - 19% Fuller Jr. High 47% Sincerely, Karl Brown Assistant Superintendent Equity and Pupil Services ac c Houston Yuille Sam Jones John Walker NOV-15-W00E 0D9 :29A M FAXN O. P. 01 Pulaski County Special School District Date: \\ \\-\\ 5- 'D D Time: 9'. is o...m FAX COVER To: ____,__\\\\.i..:,:.~:)_._o~c-=\nc\n=\n.\n.....,~..o_\u0026lt;...:.._.v:':.:\n_::l_.~-_-_,_ _ _ Number of Pages: (including cover sheet) -\"-- Message: _____________ _ P.O. Box 8601  Little Rock, Arkansas 722168601 925 East Dixon Rd. (501) 4902000  http:l/pcssdweb.k12.ar.us\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"tws_33969_34128","title":"H.T. Lockard, President of the Memphis NAACP, 2000","collection_id":"tws_33969","collection_title":"Everett R. Cook Oral History Collection","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Tennessee, Shelby County, Memphis, 35.14953, -90.04898"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2000-10-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/msword","image/png","audio/mpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":null,"dcterms_publisher":["Memphis, Tenn. : Rhodes College"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["https://vimeo.com/289801121"],"dcterms_subject":["Oral history","Interviews","Memphis (Tenn.)","Civil rights","National Association for the Advancement of Colored People","Race relations","Political science","Social justice"],"dcterms_title":["H.T. Lockard, President of the Memphis NAACP, 2000"],"dcterms_type":["Sound"],"dcterms_provenance":["Rhodes College"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.handle.net/10267/34128"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1027","title":"\"Alternative Learning Environment (ALE) Program Evaluation Two Year Comparison: Lyceum Scholar's High School (LSHS), Department of Planning Research and Evaluation,\" Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2000-09-22"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Student assistance programs","School improvement programs","Educational statistics","Educational innovations"],"dcterms_title":["\"Alternative Learning Environment (ALE) Program Evaluation Two Year Comparison: Lyceum Scholar's High School (LSHS), Department of Planning Research and Evaluation,\" Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1027"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nArkansas Aviation Historical Society banquet programs (1992), Legal documents, correspondence, newspaper clippings, notes\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nS /J// . mwd /Ill ~ Exhibit No. 67: Ll230-90 Program Evaluation for Lyceum Scholars Program at Philander Smith College. 12:02 PM I I Alternative Learning Environment (ALE) Program Evaluation Two year comparison: Lyceum Scholar's High School (LSHS) September 22, 2000 Dr. Ed R. Williams Little Rock School District (LRSD) Department of Planning Research and Evaluation 3001 S. Pulaski Little Rock, AR 72206 501-324-2125 Draft Summary Performance and achievement data, plus year-end survey data from students, parents, staff, and building principals for the Lyceum Scholar's High School (LSHS) Program at Philander Smith were collected and analyzed for SY 1998-1999 and 1999-2000. The LSHS program is a computer-based instructional learning environment using PLATO software. Program goals are to improve student achievement, grade level perfonnance, and attendance via an alternative learning environment (ALE). Student perfonnance data indicates a reduction in school absenteeism, but an increase in days suspended. Student achievement data is mixed. LSHS students, as measured by the PLATO software, are performing at grade level. Also, LSHS students outperform the LRSD average scores in math Achievement Level Test (ALT) scores. However, these students are below the LRSD average in reading and language usage ALT scores. SYl 999-2000 survey results indicate that student satisfaction increased over the SYI 998-1999 results. However, students, parents, and staff continue to be dissatisfied with food service. Also, both students and parents would like more classroom time and less time on PLATO. Students and parents are also dissatisfied with the morning bus arrival times. Staff would like more support in instructional delivery. Principals of feeder schools would like more data and information about the program and LSHS staff should provide LSHS information to all LRSD principals. It is recommended for SY2000-2001 that the meal situation be resolved, that a ibnasltarnucceti obne ael sstaubplpioshrte. d between classroom and PLATO time, and that teachers receive more 12:02 PM 2 Draft Introduction The Lyceum Scholar's High School (LSHS), grades 9 and 10, is one of three ALE programs in the LRSD. The other two programs are at Pennick Boys club, a middle level program, and Camp Pfeifer, an elementary program. The LSHS is designed for students with a high potential for success yet for several reasons are not progressing satisfactorily in the regular school setting. Students appropriate for the LSHS demonstrate excessive absences and need individualized teaching and instruction. The LSHS is designed to provide a success-oriented environment for students who would not nonnally obtain success. The LSHS offers a small class setting with an emphasis on core subjects. The curriculum is computer-based using PLATO software. Using this software, students can accelerate to a higher-grade level. The LSHS program is designed for completion of the entire secondary ocur rrreitcuurlnu mto. thAet rtehgeu claorm apslseigtinoend o sfc ehaocohl. academic year, a student may reapply to remain at LSHS LSHS admission requirements are 1. completing an application, 2. volunteering and remaining at LSHS a full year, 3. ahsasviignnge da srecchoomolm, endation from the Principal or Vice-Principal at the student's 4. having no long-tenn suspensions, and 5. being reviewed by a screening committee. Purpose The purpose of this evaluation is to 1. report and compare participation, perfonnance, and perception data on students in the LSHS SY1998-1999 and SY1999-2000\n2. ddaettae\nr manind e the relationship between PLATO assessment scores and other achievement 3. review results and propose recommendations. Methodology The following data will be compared: Participation data  Race  Gender Performance data 12:02 PM 3 Draft  Average number of days suspended  Average number of days absent  Currant grade and grade gains of all students and of students who had attended an ALE the previous year, as measured by the PLATO computer software in:  Language  Math  Reading  Average Achievement Level Test (ALT) scores in math, reading, and language usage  Correlation matrix using ALT scores and current level of PLATO assessment Perception data  Survey results of students, parents, teachers, and administrators Results Participation Data SY1998-1999. Thirteen (13) students participated in the program, with eight students participating the full year, and five srudents participating less than a full school year. Demographic data for the students are 77% male and 23% female, and 77% Black and 23% White. Eight students completed the survey. SY1999-2000. Twelve (12) students participated in the program. Ten of the twelve srudents had attended an ALE the previous year, 6 at Pennick and 4 at LSHS. Eight students completed the survey. Demographic data for students completing the survey are five males (62.5%) and three females (37.5%), and 57% African-American, 29% White, and 14% Other. Five of the students had been at an ALE the previous year. Performance Data Suspension and Absenteeism Data for LSHS Students SY1998-1999 Average days suspended from LSHS SY1999-2000 2.07 .58 Average days absent from LSHS 3.92 5.83 increaseWd.h ile the average number of days suspended has decreased, the average days absent has 12:02 PM 4 Draft Average Grade Level Gain for LSHS Students SY1998-1999 Program -SY1999-2000 Program Change Program Program Change entry exit entry exit Language Arts 3.51 7.7 +4.19 3.22 9.7 +6.48 Reading 4.49 8.08 +3.59 4.05 9.05 +5 Math 4.96 6.67 +1.71 5.29 9 +3.71 Students during SY1999-2000 had greater grade gains than students during SY1998-1999. Average Grade Level for Students who had attended an ALE for Two Years Average Average Change: Average Change: score: score: Spring to score: Fall to Spring Fall Fall Spring Spring 1999 1999 2000 Language Arts 6.71 2.45 -4.26 9.57 +7.12 Math 6.63 4.73 -1.9 8.92 +4.19 Reading 7.4 3.81 -3.59 8.95 +5.15 There was a sharp decline from spring of 1999 to fall of 1999 scores as measured by the PLATO software. However, gains during SY1999-2000 (Fall to Spring) resulted in average scores at least one and a half grade levels above the end of SY1998-1999 results. Average ALT Scores ALE Student ALT Average Score Middle District Average ALT Score Reading Language Middle Reading Language Level Math Level 3u, Grade Math 210 202 21 6 213 216 218 SY1999-2000 (N = 3) 9u Grade 218 208 215 213 221 223 SY1999-2000 (N = 4) Both grade levels were below the District average in reading and language, and gth grade students were below in math. Ninth grade students were above the District average in math. However, the District average was based on 30 students. 9th grade students typically take the Algebra I test 12:02 PM 5 Draft LSHS Student Scores Compared to their Assigned School: Southwest Middle School ALE Student ALT Average Score Middle Southwest Average ALT Score Reading Language Middle Reading Language Leve] (N =2) (N = 1) Level Math Math (N = 2) 8u' Grade 210 202 216 209 2 12 215 SY1999-2000 (N= 3) Students at LSHS did as well in math and language as students in their assigned school. LSHS Student Scores Compared to their Assigned School: Central, Fair, and HaJl ALE Student ALT Average Score Assigned School Average ALT Middle Score Reading Language Middle Reading Language Level (N=4) (N=4) Level Math (N = 4) Math 9\"' Grade 218 208 215 240 223 224 SYI 999-2000 (N = 4) sScthuodoeln.t s at LSHS did not do as well in math, reading, and language as students in their assigned Correlation Matrix: ALT scores to Current PLATO Level at the End of SY 1999-2000 Math ALT Reading Language PLATO PLATO PLATO ALT ALT Math Reading Language Math ALT 1.00 .919* .854 .057 -.053 .277 Reading 1.00 .949 .353 .139 .173 ALT Language ALT .207 -.231 -.050 PLATO - 1.00 .885* .847* Math PLATO Reading .721 * PLATO , ~'''}~~~! Language 1.00  ~ .01 level 12:02 PM 'I 6 Draft The number of students used in this analysis was low (N = 12), which makes interpretation difficult. Data from the other two ALE programs could improve the power of the correlation design. However, while there is a significant relationship among subject scores within ALT and sPuLbAjeTcOt s creosrueslt.s , there is no significant relationship between ALT subject scores and PLATO Perception Data Program evaluation surveys were distributed to students, parents, and teachers who participated in LSHS. Surveys were also sent to school principals from whence students last attended. Survey participants were asked to respond either very satisfied, satisfied, dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied to statements concerning: 1. application process, 2. facilities, 3. student services, 4. interactions with personnel, 5. instructional program, 6. transportation, 7. administrative support, 8. staff and student/parent interactions, and 9. food service. Additional questions were asked of the participants concerning: 1. plans after high school, 2. plans for next year, 3. would the participant recommend the program to others, 4. overall satisfaction with the program, and 5. need for program expansion. iSmpparcoev wemase naltsso. available for comments by participants concerning program changes or SY 1998-1999 student results. Students were dissatisfied with the following: 1. Student Services  Health services 2. Instructional Program  English instruction  Social studies instruction  Homework 12:02 PM 7 Draft 3. Food Service  Meals provided by LRSD  Meals in student center Students were satisfied with the remaining statements. Responding to the question concerning overall program satisfaction, 37.5% (N = 3) were very satisfied, 50% (N = 4) were satisfied, and 13% (N =I) were dissatisfied. Concerning plans after high school, 25% (N = 2) plan to enroll in a four-year college, 25% (N = 2) to enroll in a two-year college, 13% (N =1) to enroll in a technical training program, 25% (N = 2) were undecided, and 13% (N = 1) did not respond. Student comments are in Appendix A. SY1999-2000 student results. Students were dissatisfied with:  restrooms,  orientation,  meals provide by LRSD,  meals provided by the student center at Philander Smith College, and  morning bus arrival. Students were satisfied with the remaining statements. Responding to the question concerning overall program satisfaction, 37.5% (N = 3) were very satisfied, and 62.5% (N = 5) were satisfied. Concerning plans after high school, 50% (N = 4) plan to enroll in a four-year college, 13% (N = 1) to enroll in a two-year college, 25% (N = 2) were undecided, and 13% (N= 1) did Ano).t respond. Students would like less time on PLATO and more classroom time (see Appendix SYI 998-1999 parent results. Three parents responded to the survey. Parents were very satisfied with their child's persona] academic progress and were satisfied with most of the statements. Parents were dissatisfied with:  classroom environment,  field trips,  health services,  meals in the student center,  meals provided by LRSD,  staff providing nurture and support to students, and  social studies instruction. Half of the responding parents had volunteered at the school and wished for their child to return to the LSHS program next year. Most parents, 67%, were satisfied with the overall program and half of the responding parents would recommend the LSHS program to others. Parents were concerned about the quality of the food and interaction of students with teachers. Parent comments are in Appendix C. 12:02 PM 8 Draft dissatisfSieYd1 w99it9h-:2 000 parent results. Ten parents responded to the survey. Parents were  meals provided by LRSD,  meals provided by the student center at Philander Smith College, and  morning bus arrival. Parents were satisfied with the remaining statements. Less than half ( 40%) of the responding parents had volunteered at the school. 70% wished for their child to return to the LSHS program next year. All of the parents were satisfied with the overall program and 90% of parents would recommend the LSHS program to others. Parents would like to see less time using PLATO and more classroom time (see Appendix B). SYl 998-1999 staff results. Staff (N= 2) were both satisfied with:  student selection process,  qualifications of staff,  relationships with college personnel,  mentoring/counseling,  expectations for student behavior,  support for disciplinary actions,  service of Lyceum students in the student center,  bus arrival and departure times,  parent/staff interactions, and  classrooms. Both of the staff were dissatisfied with:  support in instructional tutoring,  administration of food service,  distribution of LRSD prepared meals,  delivery ofLRSD prepared meals, and  janitorial services. One of the staff recommend that the program continue next year and that the program be expanded to add another grade level. Also, half of the responding teachers/staff wished to return to the program next year. Recommendations for staff development and program change include Athpep neeneddi xf oCr . college level classes, security, and staff selection. Additional comments are in SY1999-2000 staff results. Staff (N = 3) were dissatisfied with  support in instructional delivery,  meals provided by the LRSD, and  meals provided by the student center at Philander Smith College. 12:02 PM \\ 9 Draft Staff were satisfied with the remaining statements. All of the staff  recommended that the program continue,  recommended that another grade level be added,  wish to return to the program next year, and  were satisfied with the program. Staff would like more space and teachers (see Appendix C). SY 1998-I 999 principal results. Principals (N ~ 2) did not have any recommendations for change and were satisfied with most of the statements. However, they were very satisfied with the qualifications of staff, computer-assisted instruction, and instructional methodology. SY 1999-2000 principal results. Principals (N== 3) were satisfied with all the Dst)a.t ements. Principals would like more data and infonnation about the program (see Appendix Discussion While suspensions were down from S YJ 998-1999 to SY l 999-2000, the average number of days absent was higher. PLATO gains and current levels for S YI 999-2000 are higher than the S YJ 998-I 999 results. However, these increased gains barely offset the sharp decrease in PLATO levels from spring to fall. Student's OUlperfonned the LRSD average in math ALT scores, but are below the LRSD average in reading and math. LSHS eighth grade students performed better in math and language, but 9 grade students performed below in math, reading, and language as compared to their assigned school peers on ALT scores. Due to a low sample size, it is difficult to interpret the relationship between ALT scores and PLATO levels. Students, parents, and teachern continue to register theIT dissatisfaction with the food service. Students and parents are also dissatisfied with the morning bus arrival. Staff would like more instructional LsuSpHpSo.r t and improved janitorial services. Principals would like more data and information about 12:02 PM IO Draft Recommendations 1. Resolve the dissatisfaction with the food service. 2. Improve the absenteeism rate. 3. Provide teachers with instructional support. 4. Determine and commit to a balance between PLATO and classroom time. 5. Resolve the dissatisfaction by students and parents with AM bus arrival. 6. Inform principals about the results of LSHS. 12:02PM Draft Appendix A Student Comments: S1998-1999 Better food next year. For the food to change \u0026amp; we have better lunches Student Comments: SY1999-2000 Less PLATO, more class time (This comment was made on fou,- surveys J Lunches 12:02 PM 12 Draft Appendix B Parent Comments: SY1998-1999 Have vou volunteered at school this year? II 'dw orautlhde nr onto mt. ind volunteering to end the Lyceum High School. As for any other reason Recommended changes: oTuhtasti dthe et hree mclaaisnsirnogo mstu. dents attending the Lyceum High School have a privilege to eat Recommended program changes: Just one teacher we has a problem with my daughter said she picked at her all the time. This teacher should have tried to find out why my daughter was feeling the way she was. And try to talk to her on her level (teen-ager), than just calling her a problem child. It atargkuesm tewnota ttoiv he.a ve a argument. My daughter \u0026amp; the teacher sounds like there both are wThhaetr et hhee pbreinlocnipgasl. would follow through on promises an my child to attend regular school The lunches that they are fed are terrible. Parent Comments: SY1999-2000 Less PLATO and more class time. (This comment was made on five surveys) 12:02PM 13 Draft 13 Appendix C Staff Comments: SY1998-1999 Recommendations for staff development: Let us take classes that count on the college level. Some of us just came out of college and can work a computer better than those who do staff development. Recommended program chanizes: eed security guard. Administrator on site everyday for program. Better selection, the process of selecting certifled teachers. For people over the program to visit more often and talk with the children. More visits among the Advisory Committee. Staff Comments: SY1999-2000 I would like to see more class space in the future. I haven't been teaching in the program long enough to make any recommendations. eed security officers and additional teachers. 12:02 PM ...I 14 Draft 14 12:02 PM Appendix D None Principal Conunents: SYI998-1999 Principal Comments: SYJ999-2000 You might consider providing us with more data about the program. You might consider yseeanrd. ing a representative to a faculty meeting for a short presentation early in the school 15 Draft 15 PROGRAM EVALUATION Philander Smith College/ LRSD Lyceum Scholars High School 1999 - 2000 This evaluation report is divided into two sections. Section I presents the results of four surveys that were completed by the following individuals: A. Students in the Lyceum Program B. Parents of Lyceum students C. Lyceum staff members D. LRSD administrators with students emolled in the Lyceum program Section II is a statistical analysis of student academic progress for the year and a report comparing student attendance and suspensions before entrance to the program and this year. KEY FINDINGS 1. The number of individuals completing each of the evaluation surveys were: Student Survey - 8 Parent Survey - 10 Staff Survey - 3 Administrative Survey - 3 2. 100% of the students were either satisfied or very satisfied with the Application Process. 3. Only 50% of the students were either satisfied or very satisfied with the Restroom Facilities. 4. 100% of the students were satisfied or very satisfied with the Student Services offered. 5. Students regarded their Interactions with College Personnel as very favorable. 6. The Instructional Program received high marks from the students. 7. 100% of the students were either satisfied or very satisfied with Staff/Student Interactions/Communications. 8. 100% of the students were either dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with the Meals Provided by LRSD. 9. 62.5% of the students were dissatisfied or very dissatisfied by the Meals in the Student Center. 10. 100% of the students were satisfied or very satisfied with the Overall Program. 11. With the exception of the survey item dealing with Meals Provided by LRSD, all of the parent responses were either satisfied or very satisfied. 12. The Staff Survey reflected complete satisfaction with the program. 13. LRSD school administrators were also highly complimentary of the program. 14. Lyceum students showed an 85% reduction in school absences, and a 30% reduction in the number of suspensions, when compared to their pre-Lyceum assignments. 15. Lyceum students recorded the following average grade level increases over the course of this school year: Language Arts - 6.48 Math- 3.71 Reading-5 Valid PROGRAM EVALUATION - LRSD LYCEUM STUDENT SURVEY 1999 - 2000 GRADE Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid 9.00 6 75.0 75.0 75.0 10.00 2 25.0 25.0 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Gender Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Male 5 62.5 62.5 62.5 Female 3 37.5 37.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Race Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent African American 4 50.0 57.1 57.1 Caucasian 2 25.0 28.6 85.7 Other 1 12.5 14.3 100.0 Total 7 87.5 100.0 Missing System 1 12.5 Total 8 100.0 Age Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid 14.00 1 12.5 12.5 12.5 15.00 3 37.5 37.5 50.0 16.00 2 25.0 25.0 75.0 17.00 2 25.0 25.0 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 School attended prior to the Lyceum Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid 8.00 1 12.5 16.7 16.7 725.00 5 62.5 83.3 100.0 Total 6 75.0 100.0 Missing System 2 25.0 Total 8 100.0 Written Application Fonns Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 42.9 42.9 Satisfied 3 37.5 42.9 85.7 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 14.3 100.0 Total 7 87.5 100.0 Missing System 1 12.5 Total 8 100.0 Personal Interview Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Vary Satisfied 3 37 .5 42.9 42.9 Satisfied 4 50.0 57.1 100.0 Total 7 87.5 100.0 Missing System 1 12.5 Total 8 100.0 Notification of Acceptance Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 42.9 42.9 Satisfied 4 50 .0 57.1 100.0 Total 7 87.5 100.0 Missing System 1 12.5 Total 8 100.0 Classrooms Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 5 62.5 62.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Restrooms Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 25.0 25.0 25.0 Satisfied 2 25.0 25.0 50.0 Dissatisfied 3 37.5 37.5 87.5 Very Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Student Center Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 42.9 . 42.9 Satisfied 3 37.5 42.9 85.7 Very Dissatisfied 1 12.5 14.3 100.0 Total 7 87.5 100.0 Missing System 1 12.5 Total 8 100.0 Media Center Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 25.0 28.6 28.6 Satisfied 4 50.0 57.1 85.7 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 14.3 100.0 Total 7 87.5 100.0 Missing System 1 12.5 Total 8 100.0 Computer Lab Access Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 12.5 12.5 12.5 Satisfied 7 87.5 87.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Orientation Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 12.5 12.5 12.5 Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 62.5 Dissatisfied 3 37.5 37.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Health Services Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 12.5 12.5 12.5 Satisfied 5 62.5 62.5 75.0 Dissatisfied 2 25.0 25.0 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Career Center Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 25.0 25.0 25.0 Satisfied 4 50 .0 50.0 75.0 Dissatisfied 2 25.0 25.0 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Mentoring/Counseling Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 25.0 25.0 25 .0 Satisfied 5 62.5 62.5 87.5 Very Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Case Management Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Faculty Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 5 62.5 62.5 62.5 Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Support Personnel Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 50 .0 Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Security Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 5 62.5 62.5 100.0 Total 8 ~00.0 100.0 Administration Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 5 62.5 62.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Classroom Management Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 5 62.5 62.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Instructional Materials Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 5 62.5 62.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Textbooks Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 5 62.5 62.5 62.5 Satisfied 2 25.0 25.0 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Computer-aided Instruction Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Vary Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 English Instruction Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 50.0 57.1 57.1 Satisfied 3 37.5 42.9 100.0 Total 7 87.5 100.0 Missing System 1 12.5 Total 8 100.0 Math Instruction Cumulative FreQuencv Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 6 75.0 75.0 75.0 Satisfied 2 25.0 25.0 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Science Instruction Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 50.0 Satisfied 2 25.0 25.0 75.0 Dissatisfied 2 25.0 25.0 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Social Studies Instruction Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 6 75.0 75.0 75.0 Satisfied 2 25.0 25.0 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Communications Instruction Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisf:ed 5 62.5 62.5 62.5 Satisfied 2 25.0 25.0 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Personal Academic Success Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 50.0 Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12..5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Individual Attention to Needs Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 50.0 Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Number of Courses Available Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 50.0 Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 87.5 Very Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Group Work Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Projects Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 75.0 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 87.5 Very Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Grading Procedures Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 50.0 Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Field Trips Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 5 62.5 62.5 62.5 Satisfied 2 25.0 25.0 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Homework Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 7 87.5 87.5 87.5 Satisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Staff Responds in a Caring and Helpful Manner Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Staff Provides Nurturance and Support to Students Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Staff Has High Expectations for My Academic Success Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 50.0 Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Staff Has High Expectations for My Behavior Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 6 15.0 75.0 75.0 Satisfied 1 12.5 12.5 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 My Teacher Respect Me as an Individual Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 so.a 50.0 50.0 Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 87.5 Dissatsified 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Support Staff Respect Me as an Individual Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 50.0 Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Meals Provided by LRSD Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 12.5 Very Dissatisfied 7 87.5 87.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Meals in Student Center Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 12.5 12.5 12.5 Satisfied 2 25.0 25.0 37.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 50.0 Very Dissatisfied 4 50.0 50.0 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Bus Arrivals A.M. Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 25.0 25.0 25.0 Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 75.0 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 87.5 Very Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Bus Arrivals P.M. Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 87.5 Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Bus Safety Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 4 50.0 50.0 87.5 Very Dissatisfied 1 12.5 12.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 Would you recommend the Lyceum Program to a friend? Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Yes 7 87.5 100.0 100.0 Missing System 1 12.5 Total 8 100.0 Overall Program Satisfaction Cumulative  Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 37.5 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 5 62.5 62.5 100.0 Total 8 100.0 100.0 If the Lyceum Program is available to you for the 2000-01 school year, what are your plans? Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Continued Enrollment 6 75.0 85.7 85. 7 Undecided 1 12.5 14.3 100.0 Total 7 87.5 100.0 Missing System 1 12.5 Total 8 100.0 What are your plans after graduation from high school? Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Enroll in Four 4 50.0 57.1 57.1 Year College Enroll in Two 1 12.5 14.3 71.4 Year College. Undecided 2 25.0 28.6 100.0 Total 7 87.5 100.0 Missing System 1 12.5 Total 8 100.0 PROGRAM EVALUATION - LRSD LYCEUM PARENT SURVEY 1999 - 2000 Gender Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Male 1 10.0 10.0 1-0.0 Female 9 90.0 90.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Race Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid African-America 6 60.0 60.0 60.0 Caucasian 4 40.0 40.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 School Last Attended Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid 1.00 1 10.0 12.5 12.5 8.00 2 20.0 25.0 37.5 725.00 5 so.a 62.5 100.0 Total 8 80.0 100.0 Missing System 2 20.0 Total 10 100.0 Relationship to Student Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Parent 10 100.0 100.0 100.0 My Child's Grade Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid 9.00 6 60.0 60.0 60.0 10.00 4 - 40.0 40.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Student Referral Procedures Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 80.0 Dissatisfied 1 10.0 10.0 90.0 22.00 1 10.0 10.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Written Application Forms Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Personal Interview Cumulative Freauency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Notification of Acceptance Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 - Orientation Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 30.0 30.0 30.0 Satisfied 7 70.0 70.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Health Services Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 30.0 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 6 60.0 66.7 100.0 Total 9 90.0 100.0 Missing System 1 10.0 Total 10 100.0 Case Management Cumulative Freauency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 44.4 44.4 Satisfied 5 50.0 55.6 100.0 Total 9 90.0 100.0 Missing System 1 10.0 Total 10 100.0 Career Center Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 20.0 22.2 22.2 Satisfied 7 70.0 77.8 100.0 Total 9 90.0 100.0 Missing System 1 10.0 Total 10 100.0 Mentoring/Counseling Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 5 50.0 55.6 55.6 Satisfied 4 40.0 44.4 100.0 Total 9 90.0 100.0 Missing System 1 10.0 Total 10 100.0 Faculty Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Support Personnel Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 5 50.0 55.6 55.6 Satisfied 4 40.0 44.4 100.0 Total 9 90.0 100.0 Missing System 1 10.0 Total 10 100.0 Security Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 30.0 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 6 60.0 66.7 100.0 Total 9 90.0 100.0 Missing System 1 10.0 Total 10 100.0 Administration Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 20.0 22.2 22.2 Satisfied 7 70.0 77.8 100.0 Total 9 90.0 100.0 Missing System 1 10.0 Total 10 100.0 Classroom Management Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Instructional Materials Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 30.0 37.5 37.5 Satisfied 5 50.0 62.5 100.0 Total 8 80.0 100.0 Missing System 2 20.0 Total 10 100.0 Textbooks Cumulative FreQuency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 30.0 30.0 30.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 90.0 Dissatisfied 1 10.0 10.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Computer-aided Instruction Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 English Instruction Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Math Instruction Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Science Instruction Cumulative Freouencv Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Social Studies Instruction Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Communications Instruction Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 20.0 20.0 20.0 Satisfied 8 80.0 80.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Your Child's Personal Academic Progress Cumulative Freauencv Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 5 50.0 50.0 90.0 Dissatisfied 1 10.0 10.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Individual Attention to Needs Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 30.0 30.0 30.0 Satisfied 7 70.0 70.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Number of Courses Available Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Group Work Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 20.0 20.0 20.0 Satisfied 8 80.0 80.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Classroom Environment Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 60.0 Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Grading Procedures Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 5 50.0 50.0 50.0 Satisfied 5 50.0 50.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Field Trips Cumulative .Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Homework Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 30.0 30.0 30.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 90.0 Dissatisfied 1 10.0 10.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Parent/Teacher Conferences Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 30.0 30.0 30.0 Satisfied 7 70.0 70.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Responsiveness of Teachers to Student Needs Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 20.0 20.0 20.0 Satisfied 8 80.0 80.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Nurturance and Support Provided students Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied . 3 30.0 30.0 30.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 90.0 Dissatisfied 1 10.0 10.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Staff Respects Me as an Individual Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Staff Responds in a Caring and Helpful Manner Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 30.0 30.0 30.0 Satisfied 7 70.0 70.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Meals Provided by LRSD Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 10.0 10.0 10.0 Satisfied 2 20.0 20.0 30.0 Dissatisfied 5 50.0 50.0 80.0 Very Dissatisfied 2 20.0 20.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Meals in Student Center Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 30.0 30.0 30.0 Satisfied 5 50.0 50.0 80.0 Dissatisfied 1 10.0 10.0 90.0 Very Dissatisfied 1 10.0 10.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Bus Arrival A.M. Cumulative Freauencv Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Vary Satisfied 3 30.0 30.0 30.0 Satisfied 5 50.0 50.0 80.0 Dissatisfied 2 20.0 20.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Bus Arrival P.M. Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 5 50.0 50.0 90.0 Dissatisfied 1 10.0 10.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 ( Bus Safety Cumulative Freauencv Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 Satisfied 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Have you volunteered at school this year? Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Yes 4 40.0 40.0 40.0 No 6 60.0 60.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Do you wish for your son/daughter to return to the Lyceum ALE Program for the 2000-01 school year? Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Yes 7 70.0 70.0 70.0 No 3 30.0 30.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Would you recommend the Lyceum ALE Program to others? Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Yes 9 90.0 90.0 90.0 No 1 10.0 10.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Overall Program Satisfaction Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied - 6 60.0 60.0 60.0 Satisfied 4 40.0 40.0 100.0 Total 10 100.0 100.0 Valid Valid Valid Missing Total Valid Valid Valid , PROGRAM EVALUATION - LRSD ~ YCEUM STAFF SURVEY 1999 - 2000 Student Selection Process Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent  Percent Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Dissatisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Curriculum Offered Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Expected Outcomes Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Very Satisfied 1 33.3 100.0 100.0 System 2 66.7 3 100.0 Selection of Staff Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Qualifications of Staff Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Teaching Perfonnance Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Relationships with College Personnel Cumulative FFequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0  100.0 Orientation Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Health Services Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Career Center Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Mentoring/Counseling Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Satisfied 2 66.7 100.0 100.0 Missing System 1 33.3 Total 3 100.0 Case Management Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Preparation/Planning Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 l ' Support in Instructional Delivery Cumulative Freouency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Dissatisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 lntructional Materials Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Program Evaluation Design Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Professional Evaluation Process Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33 .3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Expectations for Student Behavior Cumulative Freouencv Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Management of Student Behavior Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Support for Disciplinary Actions Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 66.7 100.0 100.0 Missing System 1 33.3 Total 3 100.0 Administration of Food Service Program Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Dissatsified 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Delivery of LRSD Prepared Meals Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Very Dissatisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Distribution of LRSD Prepared Meals Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Dissatisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Service of Lyceum Students in the Student Center Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Bus Arrival Times A.M. Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Bus Arrival Times P.M. Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 From Ale Administrator Cumulative (_ Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 From LRSD Administrator Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Lyceum Advisory Committee Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Parent/Staff Interactions Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Parent Involvement Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Parental Support Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Summer Teacher Training Cumulative Frequencv Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Satisfied 2 66.7 100.0 100.0 Missing System 1 33.3 Total 3 100.0 Behavior Management Training Cumulative Freauencv Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Ongoing Staff Development Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Dissatisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Plato Training Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Classrooms Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 66.7 Dissatisfied 1 33.3 33.3 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Library Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Computer Lab Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Janitorial Services Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Comfortability Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Do you recommend that the Lyceum Program continue for the 2000-01 school year? Cwnulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Yes 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Do you recommend that the Lyceum Program expand to another grade level for the 2000-01 school year? Cumulative Freauencv Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Yes 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Do you wish to return to the Lyceum Program for the 2000-01 school year? Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Yes 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Overall Program Satisfaction Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 . ,, . Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid Valid PROGRAM EVALUATION - LRSD LYCEUM ADMINISTRATIVE SURVEY 1999 - 2000 Student Referral Process Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Very Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Opportunities for Acceleration Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Very Satisfied 2 66 .7 66.7 66.7 Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Student Parent Contact Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Very Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Selection of Students Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Very Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 66.7 Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Cuniculum Offered Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Verv Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Expected Outcomes Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Verv Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Selection of Staff Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 66 .7 66.7 66.7 Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Qualifications of Staff Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 66.7 Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Relationships with Program Personnel Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 66 .7 66.7 66.7  Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Expectations for Student Behavior Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Management of Student Behavior Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 From ALE Administrator Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent . Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 From LRSD Administrator Cumulative Freouency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Student/Parent Orientation Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 66.7 Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Health Services Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 66.7 Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Case Management Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Computer Assisted Instruction Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent ( Valid Very Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 33.3 Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Instructional Methodology Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 2 66.7 66.7 66.7 Satisfied 1 33.3 33.3 100.0 Total 3 100.0 100.0 Overall Program Satisfaction Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Very Satisfied 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Would you recommend the Lyceum Program to other students? Cumulative Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent Valid Yes 3 100.0 100.0 100.0 Davi1, John 3110/00 9  .33 9 56 Davis, Lrt,ona 11/11W9 10 2.2 10.57 Lacy, Aneuah 6/24199 9 2.2 9 56 LanOI, aulanll 6/24199 9 3 8.11 Lockhart, Ray 812  1911 8 2 .  7.57 Mayfield, Branlaha 2122/00 10 7.1 11 McCoy, Nicole 8124199 9 28 7.85 Parl\u0026lt;\u0026amp;1, April 6/2.WS 10 2.8 11 Simpson, Palrlcl\u0026lt; 6/2  1911 9 2.2 g  Simpson, Shelly 812m 10 2.2 9 .  4 Slanlay, JamH 6/2,wg 9 H 911 Vian,, Rataal 6/2.WS 9 2 6 79 Program Evaluation Philander Smith College/LRSD Lyceum Academic Report 5.22 B.37 7.36 6.11 5.17 39 5.35 64 7 . 2  7 . 2  6.71 8.79 1999 - 2000 Plato Fastrack Assessment Pre/Post 6.5 7.87 5.6 9.5 2.56 8,75 52 6 83 2 56 3.83 6 57 825 5.6 8.21 57 10.22 9.25 5.7 917 5 2 76 Bl  Compiled - 4128/00 1.37 3.8 7.18 3.73 1.28 2.86 2.71  . 52 4 25 3.47 5 37  . 85 9.2  . 35 2.73 10 7.27 2.73 9.2 6.47 2 38 8.93 6.56 2.09 2 08 0 45 10 55 3.7 7.8 4.1 7.4 10.77 3.37 7.67 10.  1 2 . 7  3.6 10.82 7.22 3.7 10.23 6.53 2.09 6.07 5 86 Davis, John 9 3/10/00 Davis, L one 10 11/10/99 Lac , Aneesah 9 8/24/99 9 8/24/99 9 8/24/99 Ma , Brenisha 10 2/22/00 Mc Nicole 9 8/24/99 Par ii 10 8/24/99 Sim atrick 9 8/24/99 Sim hell 10 9/2/99 9 8/24/99 9 8/24/99 '-- Program Evaluation Philander Smith College/LRSD Lyceum Attendance \u0026amp; Sanctions 14 3 -11 9 1 -8 35 3 -32 29 13 -16 6 0 -6 45 5 -40 14 3 -11 51 24 -27 68 2 -66 43 7 -36 33 4 -29 97 5 -92\n,,} ..... Compiled- 4/28/00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 +1 1 I 0 0 1 +1 0 0 0 I 0 -1 1 0 -1 I l 0 5 2 -3 \" .~, '\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1709","title":"Court filings: District Court, order; District Court, notices of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project managment tools","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["2000-09/2001-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Arkansas. Department of Education","Education--Arkansas","Education--Finance","Education--Evaluation","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School management and organization"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings: District Court, order; District Court, notices of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project managment tools"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1709"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["33 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  FILED EAsTMk 5 N gi,ii~1,g ~~~~SAS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DMSION SEP 11 2000 ~~:M\\3/W~\u0026t~2tERK DEPCd!RK LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, * Plaintiff: * vs. * * * No. 4:82CV00866 SWW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL., * * Defendants, * MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL., Intervenors, KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL., Intervenors. * * * * * * ORDER RECEIVED SEP 1 2 2000 OfflCt Ur OESEGRE~l\\ON MONITORING Before the Court is the request of the Magnet Review Committee (''MRC\") for approval of the interdistrict magnet schools' final budget for the 1999-7000 school year. 1 Without objection, the Court hereby approves the budget as submitted. When the budget for the 2000-2001 school year is final, the MRC should submit it to the Court for approval. A. IT IS SO ORDERED this _LL day of September 2000. ~~2 ~'~ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT rHIS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET IN COMP~C~ WITH RULE 58 ANC'.WOR !9(a) FRCP 0N -//-Oo __ IV _vt;:: - -- 1 The MRC communicated the final budget to the Court in a letter dated July 28, 2000. For a copy of the letter, see docket no. 3389, attachment. ---- - ----- I - I .IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION RECEIVED OCT 2 - 2000 ~o-mnEO-F  LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF v. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of ADE's Project Management Tool for September, 2000. Respectfully Submitted, MARK PRYOR Attorney General Assistant Att e eneral 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 682-2007 Attorney for Arkansas Department of Education IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. - IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2000 B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DMSION RECEIVED NOV 1 2000 OFF/Cf Of DESEGREGATION MONITORING LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF v. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of ADE' s Project Management Tool for October, 2000. Respectfully Submitted, MARK PRYOR Attorney General TIMO Assistant Atto neral 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 682-2007 Attorney for Arkansas Department of Education IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. - IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2000 information available at Septernbef 30, 2000, the ADE calculated the ===:a:F.,.;u::\"n\"'\"d\"'i=ng for FY 00/01 sul:fect to eriodic adjustm~\"nts, B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. IN THE UNITED STA TES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DMSION nc;.\\D~i v g;;,u DEC 1 2000 OfflCEOf IJESEGREGAllOM MONITORING LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF v. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of ADE' s Project Management Tool for November, 2000. Respectfully Submitted, MARKPRYOR Attorney General Assistant Atta e General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 682-2007 Attorney for Arkansas Department of Education IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. - IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2000 B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. RECEIVED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DMSION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF v. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUN1Y SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of ADE' s Project Management Tool for January, 2001. Respectfully Submitted, MARK.PRYOR Attorney General Assistant Atta ey General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 682-2007 Attorney for Arkansas Department of Education  This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources. "}],"pages":{"current_page":384,"next_page":385,"prev_page":383,"total_pages":6766,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":4596,"total_count":81191,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"educator_resource_mediums_sms","items":[{"value":"lesson plans","hits":319},{"value":"teaching guides","hits":53},{"value":"timelines (chronologies)","hits":43},{"value":"online exhibitions","hits":38},{"value":"bibliographies","hits":15},{"value":"study guides","hits":11},{"value":"annotated bibliographies","hits":9},{"value":"learning modules","hits":6},{"value":"worksheets","hits":6},{"value":"slide shows","hits":4},{"value":"quizzes","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":40200},{"value":"StillImage","hits":35114},{"value":"MovingImage","hits":4552},{"value":"Sound","hits":3248},{"value":"Collection","hits":41},{"value":"InteractiveResource","hits":25}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"Peppler, Jim","hits":4965},{"value":"Phay, John E.","hits":4712},{"value":"University of Mississippi. Bureau of Educational Research","hits":4707},{"value":"Baldowski, Clifford H., 1917-1999","hits":2599},{"value":"Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission","hits":2255},{"value":"Thurmond, Strom, 1902-2003","hits":2077},{"value":"WSB-TV (Television station : Atlanta, Ga.)","hits":1475},{"value":"Newman, I. DeQuincey (Isaiah DeQuincey), 1911-1985","hits":1003},{"value":"The State Media Company (Columbia, S.C.)","hits":926},{"value":"Atlanta Journal-Constitution","hits":844},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":778}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"African Americans--Civil rights","hits":9441},{"value":"Civil rights","hits":8347},{"value":"African Americans","hits":5895},{"value":"Mississippi--Race relations","hits":5750},{"value":"Race relations","hits":5607},{"value":"Education, Secondary","hits":5083},{"value":"Education, Elementary","hits":4729},{"value":"Segregation in education--Mississippi","hits":4727},{"value":"Education--Pictorial works","hits":4707},{"value":"Civil rights demonstrations","hits":4436},{"value":"Civil rights workers","hits":3530}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966--Correspondence","hits":1888},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1809},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1709},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1312},{"value":"Baker, Augusta, 1911-1998","hits":1282},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1071},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":858},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":814},{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":719},{"value":"Mizell, M. Hayes","hits":674},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":626}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"name_authoritative_sms","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":2598},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1909},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1704},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1331},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1070},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":856},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":806},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":625},{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":605},{"value":"Snelling, Paula","hits":580},{"value":"Williams, Hosea, 1926-2000","hits":431}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Nobel Prize","hits":1763},{"value":"Ole Miss Integration","hits":1670},{"value":"Housing Act of 1961","hits":965},{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":704},{"value":"Memphis Sanitation Workers Strike","hits":366},{"value":"Selma-Montgomery March","hits":337},{"value":"Freedom Summer","hits":306},{"value":"Freedom Rides","hits":214},{"value":"Poor People's Campaign","hits":180},{"value":"University of Georgia Integration","hits":173},{"value":"University of Alabama Integration","hits":140}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":17820},{"value":"United States, Georgia, Fulton County, Atlanta, 33.749, -84.38798","hits":5428},{"value":"United States, Alabama, Montgomery County, Montgomery, 32.36681, -86.29997","hits":5151},{"value":"United States, Georgia, 32.75042, -83.50018","hits":4862},{"value":"United States, South Carolina, 34.00043, -81.00009","hits":4610},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":4177},{"value":"United States, Alabama, 32.75041, -86.75026","hits":3943},{"value":"United States, Mississippi, 32.75041, -89.75036","hits":2910},{"value":"United States, Tennessee, Shelby County, Memphis, 35.14953, -90.04898","hits":2579},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":2430},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":2387}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Georgia","hits":12843},{"value":"Alabama","hits":11307},{"value":"Mississippi","hits":10219},{"value":"South Carolina","hits":8503},{"value":"Arkansas","hits":4583},{"value":"Texas","hits":4399},{"value":"Tennessee","hits":3770},{"value":"Florida","hits":2601},{"value":"Ohio","hits":2391},{"value":"North Carolina","hits":1893},{"value":"New York","hits":1667}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1966","hits":10514},{"value":"1963","hits":10193},{"value":"1965","hits":10119},{"value":"1956","hits":9832},{"value":"1955","hits":9611},{"value":"1964","hits":9268},{"value":"1968","hits":9243},{"value":"1962","hits":9152},{"value":"1967","hits":8771},{"value":"1957","hits":8460},{"value":"1958","hits":8242},{"value":"1961","hits":8241},{"value":"1959","hits":8046},{"value":"1960","hits":7940},{"value":"1954","hits":7239},{"value":"1969","hits":7235},{"value":"1950","hits":7117},{"value":"1953","hits":6968},{"value":"1970","hits":6743},{"value":"1971","hits":6337},{"value":"1977","hits":6280},{"value":"1952","hits":6161},{"value":"1972","hits":6144},{"value":"1951","hits":6045},{"value":"1975","hits":5806},{"value":"1976","hits":5771},{"value":"1974","hits":5729},{"value":"1973","hits":5591},{"value":"1979","hits":5329},{"value":"1978","hits":5318},{"value":"1980","hits":5279},{"value":"1995","hits":4829},{"value":"1981","hits":4724},{"value":"1994","hits":4654},{"value":"1948","hits":4596},{"value":"1949","hits":4571},{"value":"1996","hits":4486},{"value":"1982","hits":4330},{"value":"1947","hits":4316},{"value":"1985","hits":4226},{"value":"1998","hits":4225},{"value":"1997","hits":4202},{"value":"1983","hits":4174},{"value":"1984","hits":4065},{"value":"1946","hits":4046},{"value":"1999","hits":4018},{"value":"1945","hits":4017},{"value":"1990","hits":3937},{"value":"1986","hits":3919},{"value":"1943","hits":3899},{"value":"1944","hits":3895},{"value":"1942","hits":3867},{"value":"2000","hits":3808},{"value":"2001","hits":3790},{"value":"1940","hits":3764},{"value":"1941","hits":3757},{"value":"1987","hits":3657},{"value":"2002","hits":3538},{"value":"1991","hits":3507},{"value":"1936","hits":3506},{"value":"1939","hits":3500},{"value":"1938","hits":3465},{"value":"1937","hits":3449},{"value":"1992","hits":3444},{"value":"1993","hits":3422},{"value":"2003","hits":3403},{"value":"1930","hits":3377},{"value":"1989","hits":3355},{"value":"1935","hits":3306},{"value":"1933","hits":3270},{"value":"1934","hits":3270},{"value":"1988","hits":3269},{"value":"1932","hits":3254},{"value":"1931","hits":3239},{"value":"2005","hits":3057},{"value":"2004","hits":2909},{"value":"1929","hits":2789},{"value":"2006","hits":2774},{"value":"1928","hits":2271},{"value":"1921","hits":2123},{"value":"1925","hits":2039},{"value":"1927","hits":2025},{"value":"1924","hits":2011},{"value":"1926","hits":2009},{"value":"1920","hits":1975},{"value":"1923","hits":1954},{"value":"1922","hits":1928},{"value":"2016","hits":1925},{"value":"2007","hits":1629},{"value":"2008","hits":1578},{"value":"2011","hits":1575},{"value":"2019","hits":1537},{"value":"1919","hits":1532},{"value":"2009","hits":1532},{"value":"1918","hits":1530},{"value":"2015","hits":1527},{"value":"2013","hits":1518},{"value":"2010","hits":1515},{"value":"2014","hits":1481},{"value":"2012","hits":1467}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"0193","max":"2035","count":500952,"missing":56},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"photographs","hits":10708},{"value":"correspondence","hits":9437},{"value":"black-and-white photographs","hits":7678},{"value":"negatives (photographs)","hits":7513},{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":4462},{"value":"letters (correspondence)","hits":3623},{"value":"oral histories (literary works)","hits":3607},{"value":"black-and-white negatives","hits":2740},{"value":"editorial cartoons","hits":2620},{"value":"newspapers","hits":1955},{"value":"manuscripts (documents)","hits":1692}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/","hits":41178},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":17554},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/UND/1.0/","hits":8828},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/","hits":6864},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/","hits":2186},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/","hits":1778},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-CR/1.0/","hits":1115},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","hits":197},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/","hits":60},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-RUU/1.0/","hits":51},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","hits":27}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Jim Peppler Southern Courier Photograph Collection","hits":4956},{"value":"John E. Phay Collection ","hits":4706},{"value":"John J. Herrera Papers","hits":3288},{"value":"Baldy Editorial Cartoons, 1946-1982, 1997: Clifford H. Baldowski Editorial Cartoons at the Richard B. Russell Library.","hits":2607},{"value":"Sovereignty Commission Online","hits":2335},{"value":"Strom Thurmond Collection, Mss 100","hits":2068},{"value":"Alabama Media Group Collection","hits":2067},{"value":"Black Trailblazers, Leaders, Activists, and Intellectuals in Cleveland","hits":2033},{"value":"Rosa Parks Papers","hits":1948},{"value":"Isaiah DeQuincey Newman, (1911-1985), Papers, 1929-2003","hits":1904},{"value":"Lillian Eugenia Smith Papers (circa 1920-1980)","hits":1887}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"John Davis Williams Library. Department of Archives and Special Collections","hits":8885},{"value":"Alabama. Department of Archives and History","hits":8146},{"value":"Atlanta University Center Robert W. Woodruff Library","hits":4102},{"value":"South Caroliniana Library","hits":4024},{"value":"University of North Texas. Libraries","hits":3854},{"value":"Hargrett Library","hits":3292},{"value":"University of South Carolina. Libraries","hits":3212},{"value":"Richard B. Russell Library for Political Research and Studies","hits":2874},{"value":"Mississippi. Department of Archives and History","hits":2825},{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":2633},{"value":"Rhodes College","hits":2264}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":80736},{"value":"Collection","hits":455}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":80994},{"value":"true","hits":197}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}