{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_193","title":"Annual Reports to the Magnet Review Committee","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2012/2013"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Educational statistics","Education and state","Magnet schools","Pulaski County (Ark.)--History--20th century"],"dcterms_title":["Annual Reports to the Magnet Review Committee"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/193"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nStipulation Magnet Principals ANNUAL REPORT to the MAGNET REVIEW COMMITTEE 2012-2013 CHERYL A. CARSON May 14, 2013   Stipulation Magnet Principals ANNUAL REPORT to the MAGNET REVIEW COMMITTEE 2012-2013 CHERYL A. CARSON May 14, 2013  1   BOOKER ARTS MAGNET School website: www.lrsd.org - link to Booker Arts Magnet School Principal's Name: Cheryl A. Carson E-Mail: cheryl.carson@lrsd.org Direct Phone Line: 44 7-3802 Asst. Principal's Name: Eloise Booth E-Mail: eloise.booth@lrsd.org Direct Phone Line: 44 7-3871 Area of responsibility: Student Discipline, School Facilities, Supervision of Non-Certified Personnel, Transportation School Secretary: Judy Wilson-Murray Direct Phone: 44 7-3803 Counselor: Direct Phone: Tamara Ringler 447-3833 PTA President: Anne Weaver E-Mail: anneweaver@sbc.global.net Phone: 501-247-8405 Marion Howse 447-3804  2    SCHOOL COMPOSITION Race/ Native African Hispanic/ Multi-ethnicity American Asian American Latino White Ethnic Number of 0-M 3-M 153-M 23-M 56-M 24-M children 0-F 2-F 159- F 21 - F 56-F 22-F Number 0-M 0-M 6-M 0-M 5-M 0-M of 0-F 0-F 31 - F 1 - F 31 -F 0-F staff 3    SCHOOL COMPOSITION cont. Grade Native Asian African Hispanic White Multi-Ethnic Total American American K 0-M 1-M 20-M 3-M 7-M 4-M 35-M 0-F 0-F 19-F 3-F 6-F 5-F 33-F 1 0-M 1-M 23-M 1-M 6-M 3-M 34-M 0-F 0-F 24-F 3-F 12- F 4-F 43-F 2 0-M 0-M 29-M 6-M 12-M 7-M 54-M 0-F 0-F 23-F 4-F 7-F 3-F 37-F 3 0-M 1-M 30-M 4-M 12-M 4-M 51-M 0-F 1-F 32-F 0-F 16- F 4-F 53-F 4 0-M 0-M 27-M 5-M 8-M 3-M 43-M 0-F 1-F 29-F 8-F 6-F 2-F 46-F 5 0-M 0-M 24-M 4-M 11- M 3-M 42-M 0-F 0-F 32-F 3-F 9-F 4-F 48-F 4    REQUESTS FOR BUDGET INCREASES Faculty/Staff: None Curriculum Related Materials: None Equipment/Facility: Bows for Stringed Instruments Other (please list): Instrument Repair 5   CURRENT ACSIP FOCUS Priority 1 : Literacy Goal 1: All students will improve in reading comprehension and written expression, with additional attention to practical reading passages, content and style writing domains, and formulating appropriate responses to open response questions. Goal 2: To narrow the achievement gap between proficient and non-proficient learners in literacy. (Strategic Plan) Goal 3: All Booker Arts Magnet School students will read on grade level by the end of third grade. (Strategic Plan) Priority 2: Mathematics  Goal 1. All students will improve in mathematics computation and problem solving, with additional attention to geometry and measurement, and formulating appropriate responses to open response questions. Goal 2: To narrow the achievement gap between proficient and non-proficient learners in mathematics. (Strategic Plan) 6   CURRENT ACSIP FOCUS Priority 3: Wellness Goal : All students will increase healthy eating habits, practice good hygiene, and engage in fitness activities, as indicated by increases in the attendance rate and percentages of students having ratings of healthy on the BMI. Priority 4: Parental Involvement Goal: All parents/guardians will become engaged in parental involvement activities that will result in increases in student achievement.  7    SCHOOL STRUCTURAL CHANGES/IMPROVEMENTS 2012- 2013 Automatic Locking Mechanisms on Main Entry Door 2013- 2014 Additional Security Cameras Restroom Renovations 8    CURRICULUM/COURSE OFFERINGS Changes in 2012-13: None Proposed Changes for 2013-14: None 9    ESEA Accountability Literacy: Achieving Mathematics: Needs Improvement Subpopulation info: See Slides 11 - 23 10   BenchmLairtekr ac3Yy :e aCr omparison SubgrouWpistMh orTeh a2n0 S tudents  100.0.- -----....-r-------,----- ...........~....,. ....\nw-,!r-ihHr--~~-----rrl'I'~----, 80.0 71.1 65.5 60.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 - Combined African Hispanic Caucasian Econ. LEP IEP PopulatioAnm erican Disadv. PercePnrto ficient D 2009-10 37.9 12010-11 jo2011-12 J 11   BenchmLairtekr ac3Yy :e aCr omparison SubgrouWpisthM orTeh a2n0 S tudents  100.0r-- ---.n.--r----- ............ --~+-e,t-A-------------............------, 80.0 71.1 65.5 60.0 I 40,0 20.0 0.0 Combined African Hispanic Caucasian Econ. LEP IEP PopulatioAnm erican Disadv. PercePnrto ficient I  2009-10 37.9 12010-11 1  2011-12 12   BenchmLairtekr ac3Yy :e aCr omparison SubgrouWpistMh orTeh a2n0 S tudents  100.0... ----..-,.-r------ .............-.- -M--\u0026amp;-\u0026amp;.+-A---------- 80.0 71.1 65.5 60.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 Combined African PopulatioAnm erican Hispanic Caucasian Econ. Disadv. PercePntr oficient 1--~~ 2009-10 37.9 12010-11 D2011-12 LEP IEP 13  90.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0  Achievement Gap: Benchmark Literacy 3 Year Trends 84.9 ,----a1a2 --61.7  Caucasian  African American 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Percent Proficient  14    Benchmark Literacy by Gender 100%\u0026gt; 78% 80%\u0026gt; 71 Ofo 60% Female 40%  Male 20% 0% 2010-11 2011-12 Percent Proficient 15   BenchmaMrka th3: Y earC omparison SubgrouWpsit hM oreT han2 0S tudents 100.0 r-----------------1'1-f-tt-~-------------, 80.0 75.16.0 70.0 57.52.2 67.3 60.0 40.0 I 20.0 0.0 67.74 72.4'3.627 .8 Combined African Hispanic Caucasian EconD. isadv.L EP Population American PercenPtr oficient 61.5 27.6 IEP  7 D 2009-10 I 2010-11 ~2011-12 16   Achievement Gap: Benchmark Math 3 Year Trends 100.0 90.0 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 77 67. 0.0 ---...----..---------1 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Percent Proficient  Caucasian  African American  17  I 100%\u0026gt; 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 84%\u0026gt;  Benchmark Math by Gender 58.27% 76.43% ...--------. 64 .5 2 % 2010-11 2011-12 Percent Proficient  Female  Male 18  100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0  Booker 3rd Grade Math Caucasian Caucasian African male female American male African American Female Booker 3rd Grade Literacy Caucasian Caucasian male female African American male African American Female 2009-10  2010-11  2011-12 2009-10  2010-11  2011-12  19  120 100 80 60 40 20 0  Booker 4th Grade Math Caucasian Caucasian African male female American male African American Female 2009-10  2010-11  2011-12 Booker 4th Grade Literacy 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Caucasian Caucasian African male female American male African American Female 2009-10  2010-11  2011-12  20  120 100 80 60 40 20 0  Booker 5th Grade Math Caucasian Caucasian African male female American male African American Female 2009-10  2010-11  2011-12 Booker 5th Grade Literacy 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Caucasian Caucasian African male female American male African American Female 2009-10  2010-11  2011-12  21  African American White Difference  Booker Arts Magnet School A Comparison of the Percent of African American and Caucasian Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced on Augmented Benchmark Exam 2009-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 Literacy 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 33.3% 38.5% 52.1% 58.6% 67.7% 67.2% 72.0% 77.9% 78.6% 84.4% 33.9% 33.5% 25.8% 20.0% 16.7%  2011-12 78.1% 84.8% 6.7% 22  African American White Difference  Booker Arts Magnet School A Comparison of the Percent of African American and Caucasian Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced on Augmented Benchmark Exam 2009-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 Mathematics 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 42.3% 50.9% 61.7% 67.5% 72.2% 73.1% 78.8% 86.0% 87.8% 84.4% 30.8% 27.9% 24.3% 20.3/o 12.2%  2011-12 67.2% 77.2% 10.0% 23    Booker Arts Magnet Percentage of Students Scoring AUAbove 50th Percentile by Subgroup on Norm Referenced Tests - First Grade 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Reading Math Reading Math Reading Math Reading Math Combined 35% 34/o 29% 41% 37% 46% 55% 37% African 30%) American 26% 19% 35% 30% 37% 52% 30% Hispanic 17% 0% 0% 50% 33% 50% 58% 50% Caucasian 50% 57% 61% 54% 49% 58% 56% 44% Econ Dis 28% 28% 22% 37% 28% 38% 53% 32% LEP 0% 0% 0% 33% 38% 50% 60% 50% Students 38% 38% 0% with 29% 0% 9% 29% 21% Disabilities 24    Booker Arts Magnet Percentage of Students Scoring At/Above 50th Percentile by Subgroup on Norm Referenced Tests - Second Grade 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Reading Math Reading Math Reading Math Reading Math Combined 31% 53/o 25% 41% 29% 42% 52% 53% African 22% 43% 12% 34% 19% 36% 44% 34% American Hispanic 15% 62% 14% 43% 50% 90% 67% 67% Caucasian 48% 62% 52% 55% 65% 35% 55% 71% Econ Dis 22% 45% 22% 42% 29% 38% 45% 47% LEP 18% 64% 18% 43% 63% 88% 83% 88% Students 11% 22% 11% 33% 13% 25% 0% 0% with Disabilities 25    Strategic Planning Goal Goal: All Students will be proficient in Literacy by end of 3rd Grade. Result: More of Booker's 3rd grade students scored proficient or above on last year's Benchmark Literacy Exam than in the  previous year. In 2012 70.24% of Booker's 3rd grade students scored proficient or above on the 3rd grade Benchmark Exam. In 2011 68.13% of Booker's 3rd grade students scored proficient or above on the 3rd grade Benchmark Exam. 26    LRSD's Strategic Plan Achievement Goals for Literacy (Chart 1)  Increase the percent proficient and advanced in literacy by 5 percentile points a year for each grade level (grades 3-5)  Reduce the achievement gap for proficient and advanced by increasing the percent of African-American students scoring proficient and advanced in literacy by 6 percentile points a year for each grade level (grades 3-5) 27    Chart 1 2011 - 2012 2011 - 2012 2011 - 2012 Third Fourth Fifth H/L 100/o +80% 80% +20% 70% +45% Males H/L 86% -14% 100% 100% Females AA 59% +2% 76% +36% 59% -3% Males AA 80% -2% 97% +9% 97% +10% Females White 80% +10% 82% +1% 90% -3% Males White 43% -26% 72% -23% 100% +8% Females 28   LRSD's Strategic Plan Achievement Goals for Mathematics (Chart 2)   Increase the percent proficient and advanced in mathematics by 5 percentile points a year for each grade level (grades 3-5)  Reduce the achievement gap for proficient and advanced by increasing the percent of African-American students scoring proficient and advanced in mathematics by 6 percentile points a year for each grade level (grades 3-5) 29    Chart 2 2011 - 2012 2011- 2012 2011 - 2012 Third Fourth Fifth H/L 100/o 60% -10% 40% +15/o Males H/L 86% -14% 67% -33% 100% Females AA 63% -11% 76% +36% 35% -37% Males AA 66% -12% 79% -9% 85% -2% Females White 90% +10 72% -1% 70% -23% Males White 72% -10% 75% -8% 77% -15% Females 30   LRSD's Strategic Plan Achievement Goals for Literacy (Chart 3)   Increase the percent at the advanced level in literacy by 4 percentile points a year for each grade level (grades 3-5)  Reduce the achievement gap at the advanced levels by increasing the AfricanAmerican percent advanced in literacy by 6 percentile points a year for each grade level (grades 3-5) 31    Chart 3 2011 - 2012 2011 - 2012 2011 - 2012 Third Fourth Fifth H/L 25% +5% 20% 30% +30% Males H/L 86% +36% 67/o +34% 67% +67/o Females AA 22% +13% 43% +34% 22% +14% Males AA 80% +42% 58% +30% 67% +32% Females White 30% -10% 64% +9% 50% Males White 43% +12% 42% +3% 47% +22% Females 32   LRSD's Strategic Plan Achievement Goals for Mathematics (Chart 4)   Increase the percent at the advanced level in mathematics by 4 percentile points a year for each grade level (grades 3-5)  Reduce the achievement gap at the advanced levels by increasing the AfricanAmerican percent advanced in literacy by 6 percentile points a year for each grade level (grades 3-5) 33 Chart 4 2011 - 2012 2011 - 2012 2011 - 2012 Third Fourth Fifth H/L 75% +55% 40% +20/o 30% +30% Males H/L 86% +36% 33% 0% -100% Females AA 30% +4% 19% +13% 15% -5% Males AA 43% -7% 27% -9% 22% -13% Females White 60% +10% 45% -28% 40% -39% Males White 29% -15% 33% -11% 24% -26% Females 34 LRSD's Strategic Plan Achievement Goals for Literacy {Chart 5) There will be no students at Below Basic or just Basic in Literacy and virtually all students perform at grade level in reading by the end of Grade 3. 33    Chart 5 2011 - 2012 2011 - 2012 2011 - 2012 Third Fourth Fifth Below Basic Basic Below Basic Basic Below Basic Basic H/L 25% 001o 0% 20% 0% 30% Males H/L 0% 14% 0% 0% 0% 0% Females AA 22% 22% 0% 24% 22% 19% Males AA 3% 17% 0% 3% 0% 4% Females White 10% 10% 9% 9% 0% 10% Males White 29% 29% 0% 8% 0% 0% Females 35    INTERVENTION OR SUPPORT SERVICES  Reading Recovery -All Students Scoring Below Basic in Literacy  After-School Tutoring -All Students Scoring Basic or Below Basic in Literacy and/or Math Invited  Small Group Intervention -All Students Scoring Below Basic in Literacy who were not in AfterSchool Tutoring  Rtl - All Students Scoring in the Lowest Percentiles on Standardized Assessment  Summer School - All Students scoring \"at risk\" on DIBELS, have IRls, or Below Basic on Standardized Assessment  Resource  LEP Instructional Modifications and Testing Accommodations  504 Accommodations  Speech  OT, PT  GT  Individual and Small Group Counseling36  Living Hope  Academic Improvement Plans and Intensive Reading Interventions  Starfish Reading Initiative  PIES (Positive Interventions for Educational Success) Plan-s- --------------' 36   RECRUITMENT Outstanding/New Recruitment Activities.  Satisfied Parents  Members of the Booker Arts Magnet Family 17 Students - Children of Alumni 18 Students - Children or Grandchildren of Staff 223 Students - Siblings Attend/Attended 258 Students with Booker Arts Magnet School Family Ties Three Teachers are Alumni  37   Booker Arts Magnet School Honors/Awards School/Staff/Student Recognitions  Choir students performed at the Capitol Hotel on December 20, 2012.  Drama students presented an excerpt from \"Beatrice's Goat\" at Artistry in the Rock on April 30, 2013.  Creative Movement students participated in Jump Rope for Heart and Hoops for Heart.  Math students participated in the Matheletes and Go Figure! mathematics competitions.  Hejun Chen, fourth grade student, won eighth place in the Pulaski County Spelling Bee.  Dante Watson, fourth grade student, won fourth place in the Little Rock School District Science Fair.   Alta and Kaiya Griffith performed in \"Madeline and the Gypsies\" at the Arkansas Arts Center.  Mayrean Johnson and Mary McMorran were honored for 40 and 38 years of service to the Little Rock School District., respectively.  Gifted and Talented students participated in the Little Rocker's Marathon.  Mary Lou Alley, Susan Blue, Tammy Higdon, and Patti Jackson received the President's Service Award for Volunteer Service to the Little Rock School District. 38   Participation at National/Regional/Local Conferences or lnservices  Gail Hollamon and Emily Vaughn - Mickelson Exxon Mobil Teacher Academy for Math and Science  Emily Vaughn served on the Arkansas Department of Education's Range-finding Committee for Third Grade Writing  All-State Music Conference  Arkansas Counseling Association Conference  AGATE  CGI Training  NABSE  Powerful Coaching  39    Booker Arts Magnet Composition - Withdrawals 2012-2013 Grade Native Asian African Hispanic/ White Multi-Ethnic Total American American Latino K 0 0 3 1 3 0 7 1 0 1 1 0 5 1 8 2 1 0 3 1 1 0 6 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 5 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 1 1 9 3 12 1 27 40    Booker Arts Magnet Explanation of Withdrawals Transferred to Moved out of Transferred to Moved out of Moved out of Another LRSD LRSD Private Charter State Country School School K 1 4 1 1 0 7 1 5 1 0 2 0 8 2 0 3 1 2 0 6 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 4 0 3 0 0 0 3 5 0 2 0 0 0 2 6 13 3 5 0 27 41  Native American K 0-M 0-F 1 0-M 0-F 2 0-M 0-F 3 0-M 0-F 4 0-M 0-F 5 0-M 0-F Total 0-M 0-F  Booker Arts Magnet Discipline Report - In School Suspensions 2012-2013 Asian African Hispanic/ White American Latino 0-M 4-M 1-M 8-M 0- F 2-F 0-F 0-F 0-M 1-M 1-M 0-M 0-F 3-F 0-F 0-F 0-M 18-M 2-M 4-M 0-F 5-F 0-F 0-F 2-M 6-M 2-M 2-M 0-F 6-F 0-F 0-F 0-M 13-M 2-M 3-M 0-F 8-F 0-F 0-F 0-M 14-M 1-M 6-M 0-F 11 - F 0-F 1 - F 2-M 56-M 9-M 23-M 0- F 35-F 0-F 1-F  Multi- Total Ethnic 0-M 13-M 2-F 4-F 1-M 3-M 0-F 3-F 1-M 25-M 0-F 5-F 0-M 12-M 0-F 6-F 2-M 20-M 0-F 8-F 0-M 21-M 1-F 13-F 4-M 94-M 3-F 39-F 42    Booker Arts Magnet Discipline Report - Out of School Suspensions 2012-2013 Native Asian African Hispanic/Lati White Multi-Ethnic Total American American no K 0-M 0-M 8-M 2-M 4-M 0-M 14-M 0-F 0-F 8-F 0-F 0-F 2-F 10-F 1 0-M 0-M 6-M 1-M 0-M 1-M 8-M 0-F 0-F 0-F 0-F 0-F 0-F 0-F 2 0-M 0-M 19-M 2-M 3-M 0-M 24-M 0-F 0-F 3-F 0-F 0-F 0-F 3-F 3 0-M 0-M 4-M 0-M 1-M 0-M 5-M 0-F 0-F 6-F 0-F 1-F 0-F 7-F 4 0-M 0-M 20-M 3-M 0-M 1-M 24-M 0-F 0-F 7-F 0-F 0-F 0-F 7-F 5 0-M 0-M 10-M 0-M 3-M 0-M 13-M 0-F 0-F 0-F 0-F 0-F 0-F 0-F Total 0-M 0-M 67-M 8-M 11-M 2-M 88-M 0-F 0-F 24-F 0-F 1-F 2-F 27-F 43 K 1 2 3 4 5 Total Booker Arts Magnet Discipline Report - Long Term Suspension - ALE 2012 -2013 Native Asian African Hispanic/ White Multi-Ethnic American American Latino 0 0 1 - F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 - F 0 0 0 Total 1 - F 0 0 0 0 0 1 - F 44    Share the GOOD NEWS  Big Brothers/Big Sisters Mentoring Program  Living Hope, School-Based Mental Health Program  Benchmark \"Our Wheels are Turning\" Challenge Parent Involvement Activities  VIPS Reading Day  Family Math and Literacy Night  Family Movie Nights  Dream Keepers Garage Sale  Thanksgiving Food Baskets Drive  Pajama Day Gift Drive  Campus Beautification Day  37,781.75 VIPS Hours, average of 72.1 hours per student 45    STIPULATION MAGNET SCHOOLS ANNUAL REPORT FORM - 2013 SCHOOL: Booker Arts Magnet School PRINCIPAL'S NAME: Cheryl A. Carson: e-mail: cheryl.carson@,lrsd.org phone: 447-3802 OTHER ADMINISTRATORS (Asterisk if new): NAME: * Eloise Booth e-mail: eloise.booth@lrsd.org phone: 447-3871 SCHOOL SECRETARY: Judy Wilson-Murray phone: 447-3803 ............................................................................... CURRENTENROLLMENT: 519 LAST YEAR'S ENROLLMENT: 543 RACIAL COMPOSITION: 60%B 40%NB 1. PLEASE BE SPECIFIC AND LIST ANY REQUESTS FOR BUDGET INCREASES. 2 . Our musical instruments are in need ofrepair. We also need to replace bows for use with our stringed instruments. A cost estimate for these needs is $5,000.00. SHARE WITH US WHAT YOU HA VE FOCUSED ON IN YOUR ACSIP. The staff at Booker Arts Magnet School focused on improving the literacy and mathematics skills of all students. Interventions utilized to improve student achievement in literacy included Reading Recovery, ELLA, Effective Literacy, Literacy Lab, and differentiation of instruction. Differentiation of instruction, increasing mathematics vocabulary, and use of Cognitively Guided Instruction strategies were utilized to improve mathematics achievement. Many efforts have been made to provide differentiated instruction based on student's identified needs. Small group interventions in literacy and mathematics have been provided by classroom teachers, Reading Recovery teachers, instructional specialists, fine arts specialists, and our Literacy and Math teacher. Camp Jaguar, Booker Arts Magnet School's after-school tutoring program, provided twice weekly tutoring sessions on literacy, mathematics, and test-taking strategies to most of our second, third, fourth, and fifth grade students who scored basic or below basic on the Augmented Benchmark Exam or the Iowa Test of Basic Skills in 2011-2012 and tpeir siblings. A separate Activity Time following the Camp Jaguar sessions was provided to all interested students. The Activity Time course offerings were arts and crafts, basketball, cooking, and dance. These sessions provided by certified teachers and administrators began in September 2012 and ended in March 2013. Students who were unable to participate in Camp Jaguar were provided small group interventions to address their areas of need during the school day. In addition, interventions to promote wellness and increase student attendance were implemented. A partnership between Booker Arts Magnet School and the city of Little Rock resulted in the Love Your Schools initiative. Cooking Matters classes were provided to interested families 1    3. for six weeks in February and March 2013. ZUMBA classes were provided three afternoons weekly to our staff and interested parents . PROVIDE STRUCTURAL CHANGES/IMPROVEMENTS Automatic locking mechanisms on our main entry door were installed during the second semester of2012-2013. Additional security cameras will be installed, and student, staff, and Health Room restrooms will be renovated in the very near future. 4. REPORT ON CURRICULUM/COURSE OFFERINGS 5. There are no proposed changes in the curriculum offerings for the 2013-2014 school year, other than the incorporation of the Common Core Standards for third through fifth grades in our curriculum maps. DID YOUR SCHOOL MEET ESEA ACCOUNT ABILITY GOALS AND THE DISTRICT'S STRATEGIC PLANNING GOALS? Booker Arts Magnet School was designated as an Achieving School in Literacy with 80.37 percent of all students scoring proficient or advanced. 77.73 percent of the Targeted Achievement Gap Group scored proficient or advanced. All students, the Targeted Gap Group, and all subgroups of students made their growth goal in Literacy ranging from 66.67 percent of Students with Disabilities to 95 .24 percent of Hispanic students. A three year comparison of the percentage of students scoring proficient or advanced in Literacy on the Augmented Benchmark Exam indicated steady growth for each subgroup of students with twenty or more students. The gap between the percentage of African American students and Caucasian students scoring proficient or advanced in Literacy on the Augmented Benchmark Exam decreased by 10.0 percent to a gap of 6.7 percent. A comparison of the Augmented Benchmark Exam scores of male and female students indicated that 90.00 percent of female students scored proficient or advanced and 71.00 percent of male students scored proficient or advanced. The gap between the percentage of male and female students scoring proficient or advanced increased from 18.0 percent on the 2010-2011 Augmented Benchmark Exam to 19.0 percent on the 2011-2012 Augmented Benchmark Exam. Booker Arts Magnet School was designated as a Needs Improvement School in Mathematics with 70.00 percent of all students scoring proficient or advanced. 66.82 percent of the Targeted Achievement Gap Group scored proficient or advanced. No subgroup of students made their growth goal in Mathematics. A three year comparison of the percentage of students scoring proficient or advanced in Mathematics on the Augmented Benchmark Exam indicated a decline for each subgroup of students with twenty or more students. The gap between the percentage of African American students and Caucasian students scoring proficient or advanced in Mathematics on the Augmented Benchmark Exam decreased by 2.2 percent to a gap of l 0.0 percent. A comparison of the Augmented Benchmark Exam scores of male and female students indicated that 76.43 percent of female students scored proficient or advanced and 64.52 percent of male students scored proficient or advanced. The gap between the percentage of male and female students scoring proficient or advanced decreased by 13.82 percent from 25.73 percent to 11.91 percent. 2   6.  The 2011-2012 Augmented Benchmark Exam scores met or exceeded the 2011- 2012 Strategic Plan goal for increasing the percentage of all students scoring proficient or advanced by five percentile points (six percentile points for African American students) in Literacy in third grade for Hispanic males and White males. Scores for fourth grade students met or exceeded the goal for Hispanic males, Hispanic females (already at 100%), African American males, and African American females. Scores for fifth grade students met or exceeded the goal for Hispanic males, African American females, and White females. The Strategic Plan goal for increasing the percentages of students scoring advanced by four percentile points (six percentile points for African American students) in Literacy in third grade met or exceeded the goal for Hispanic males, Hispanic females, African American males, African American females, and White females. Scores for fourth grade students met or exceeded the goal for Hispanic females, African American males, African American females, and White males. Scores for fifth grade students met or exceeded the goal for Hispanic males, Hispanic females, African American males, African American females, and White females. The Strategic Plan goal for eliminating all students scoring basic or below basic in Literacy on the Augmented Benchmark Exam was not met for any subgroup of students in third through fifth grades. The percentages of third grade students scoring proficient or advanced in Literacy on the Augmented Benchmark Exam are as follows: Hi~panic males-75%, Hispanic females-86%, African American males-56%, African American females-80%, White males-80%, and White females-42%. The percentages of fourth grade students scoring proficient or advanced in Literacy on the Augmented Benchmark Exam are as follows: Hispanic males-80%, Hispanic females-100%, African American males-76%, African American females-97%, White males-82%, and White females-92%. The percentages of fifth grade students scoring proficient or advanced in Literacy on the Augmented Benchmark Exam are as follows: Hispanic males-70%, Hispanic females-100%, African American males-59%, African American females-96%, White males-90%, and White females- I 00%. The 2011-2012 Augmented Benchmark Exam scores met or exceeded the 2011- 2012 Strategic Plan goals for increasing the percentage of all students scoring proficient or advanced by five percentile points (six percentile points for African American students) in Mathematics in third grade for White males. Scores for fourth grade students met or exceeded the goal for African American males. Scores for fifth grade students met or exceeded the goal for Hispanic males. The Strategic Plan goal for increasing the percentages of students scoring advanced by four percentile points (six percentile points for African American students in Mathematics) in third grade met or exceeded the goal for Hispanic males, Hispanic females, and White males. Scores for fourth grade students met or exceeded the goal for African American males. Scores for fifth grade students met or exceeded the goal for Hispanic males. PLEASE LIST ANY INTERVENTION OR SUPPORT SERVICES YOUR SCHOOL PROVIDED TO ENHANCE ACADEMICS, TEST-TAKING SKILLS, OR TO RAISE TEST SCORES. In addition to the interventions listed in the response to the second question, Response to Intervention targeted interventions were provided to students who were significantly below grade level and who were progress monitored by the School-Based Intervention Team. Resource, Speech Therapy, Occupational Therapy, and Physical 3  7.  8.  Therapy services were provided to students with identified needs. Gifted and Talented instruction was provided to all kindergarten through second grade students and to identified second through fifth grade students. 504 accommodations were provided to identified students. Limited English Proficient students were also provided instructional modifications and testing accommodations when needed. Small group and individual counseling sessions were conducted for students identified by the School-Based Intervention Team, parent referral, teacher referral, and/or due to disciplinary sanctions. Living Hope also provided individual and family services to identified students and their families. Academic Improvement Plans and Intensive Reading Intervention Plans were created and implementing for each student scoring basic or below basic on standardized assessments. Volunteers for the Starfish Reading Initiative provide individual tutoring two days a week for identified kindergarten students. Summer School was also offered to all students scoring basic or below basic. PIES (Positive Interventions for Educational Success) plans were developed for students who repeatedly violated Category I and/or Category II rules. LIST OUTSTANDING OR NEW RECRUITMENT ACTIVITIES. Satisfied parents are the most effective recruitment tool. Parents who feel that they are viewed as partners in their child's education and who feel that their child is an important part of the school family assist in Booker Arts Magnet School's recruitment effort. As of May 7, 2013, the incoming kindergarten class for 2013- 2014 included twenty-one students whose parents or older siblings attended school at Booker Arts Magnet. Also, seventeen students assigned for the 2013-2014 school year have parents who are alumni. Eighteen students are the children or grandchildren of LRSD staff members. 223 of our students have siblings who currently attend or have attended Booker Arts Magnet School. A total of 258 students have family ties to Booker Arts Magnet School. This information indicates that Booker Arts Magnet School has satisfied parents who value their children's experiences at Booker and have re-enrolled them for the 2013-2014 school year. RECAP HONORS AND/OR AW ARDS WON  Gail Hollamon and Emily Vaughn were chosen to participate in the Mickelson Exxon Mobile Teacher Academy for Math and Science to be held this summer.  Mayrean Johnson and Mary McMorran were honored for 40 and 38 years of service to LRSD, respectively.  Booker Arts Magnet School's choir students performed at the Capitol Hotel on December 20, 2012.  Drama students presented an excerpt from \"Beatrice's Goat\" at Artistry in the Rock on April 30, 2013.  Creative Movement students participated in Jump Rope for Heart and Hoops for Heart.  Math students participated in the Matheletes and Go Figure! mathematics competitions.  Hejun Chen, fourth grade student, won eighth place at the Pulaski County Spelling Bee.  Gifted and talented students participated in the Little Rockers Marathon as part of a unit on wellness.  Dante Watson, fourth grade student, won forth place at the LRSD Science Fair. 4    9.  Alta and Kaiya Griffith performed in \"Madeline and the Gypsies\" at the Arkansas Arts Center.  Mary Lou Alley, Susan Blue, Tammy Higdon, and Patti Jackson received the Presidential Award for their volunteer service to the Little Rock School District. RECAP PARTICIPATION AT NATIONAL, REGIONAL, OR LOCAL CONFERENCES OR INSERVICES. Staff members at Booker Arts Magnet School participated in research-based \"best practices\" training such as the All-State Music Conference, Arkansas Counseling Association Conference, AGATE, CGI training, NABSE, and Powerful Coaching. Emily Vaughn, third grade teacher, served on ADE's Range Finding Committee to set the ranges for the third grade writing assessments. 10. PROVIDE INFORMATION AS TO NUMBER OF STUDENTS WHO HAVE WITHDRAWN OR EXITED YOUR SCHOOL'S PROGRAM AND THE REASONS FOR DOING SO. 11. Twenty-seven students have withdrawn from Booker Arts Magnet School during the 2012-2013 school year. Nine students were African American, three students were Hispanic/Latino, twelve students were White, and three students were MultiEthnic. Seven students were in kindergarten, eight in first grade, six in second grade, one in third grade, three in fourth grade, and two in fifth grade. Seventeen of the students were males, and ten of the students were females. Twelve students moved out of the District. Six students transferred to other LRSD schools. Three students transferred to private or charter schools. Six students moved out of Arkansas. PROVIDE A DISCIPLINE REPORT WHICH INCLUDES IN-SCHOOL SUSPENSIONS, OUT OF SCHOOL SUSPENSIONS, AND LONG TERM SUSPENSIONS. A total of 133 in-school suspensions have been administered to Booker Arts Magnet School students during the 2012-2013 school year. In kindergarten, one inschool suspension was administered to a Hispanic male, four to African American males, two to African American females, eight to White males, and two to Multiethnic females. In first grade, one in-school suspension was administered to a Hispanic male, one to an African American male, three to African American females, and one to a Multi-ethnic male. In second grade, two in-school suspensions were administered to Hispanic males, eighteen were administered to African American males, five to African American females, four to White males, and one to a Multi-ethnic male. In third grade, two in-school suspensions were administered to Hispanic males, two to Asian males, six to African American males, six to African American females, and two to White males. In fourth grade, two in-school suspensions were administered to Hispanic males, thirteen to African American males, eight to African American females, three to White males, and two to Multiethnic males. In fifth grade, one in-school suspension was administered to a Hispanic male, fourteen to African American males, eleven to African American females, six to White males, one to a White female, and one to a Multi-ethnic female. 5  12 .   A total of 115 out-of school suspensions have been administered to Booker Arts Magnet School students during the 2012-2013 school year. In kindergarten, two suspensions were administered to Hispanic males, eight to African American males, eight to African American females, four to White males, and two to Multiethnic females. In first grade, one suspension was administered to a Hispanic male, six to African American males, and one to a Multi-ethnic male. In second grade, two suspensions were administered to Hispanic males, nineteen to African American males, three to African American females, and three to White males. In third grade, four suspensions were administered to African American males, six to African American females, one to a White male, and one to a White female. In fourth grade, three suspensions were administered to Hispanic males, twenty to African American males, seven to African American females, and one to a Multi-ethnic male. In fifth grade, ten suspensions were administered to African American males and three to White males. One long-term suspension was administered to an African American female who physically assaulted several staff members. An examination of the offenses for which our students received the in-school suspensions, the out-of school suspensions, and the long term suspension indicated that the majority of these offenses were Disorderly Conduct, Fighting, Tardiness, Bullying, and Sexual Misconduct. PIES (Positive Interventions for Educational Success) plans have been developed for students having repeated violations of the same offenses in an effort to extinguish the students' inappropriate behaviors. SUPPLY ANY OTHER INFORMATION YOU WISH TO INCLUDE. Big Brothers, Big Sisters of Arkansas assisted Booker Arts Magnet School by providing mentors for twelve of our students with academic, behavioral, or self-esteem needs. This was the eighth year of partnership with Big Brothers, Big Sisters who provides our mentors through the UALR Law School, Philander Smith College, and Little Rock Fire Fighters. Several students also have mentors through Pfeifer Camp. Booker Arts Magnet School students and their families have benefitted from our partnership with Living Hope, a school-based mental health provider. Living Hope provides a full time case worker and part-time therapist for students and provides medication clinics once a month for families who need services. Living Hope also has a community-based program and a summer program for students. Living Hope currently serves Booker Arts Magnet School students and their families. The Benchmark \"Our Wheels are Turning\" Challenge, a motivational program to encourage students to exhibit good test-taking behaviors such as coming to school on time, working the entire testing period, and checking over their answers once they have completed their test if time permits, resulted in the principal riding a \"hog\" (Harley Davidson motorcycle), and the Literacy Ladies riding inside and on top of a \"bug\" (Volkswagen Beetle) on April 19, 2013. Parental involvement activities for the 2012-2013 school year included VIPS Reading Day, Family Math and Literacy ight, two Family Movie Nights, and the Dream Keepers Garage Sale. Parents also supported Booker Arts Magnet School's efforts by donating food items for our Thanksgiving Baskets and funds for the Pajama Day fundraiser to provide gifts for needy Booker Arts Magnet School 6    children for Christmas. Other parent involvement activities included Campus Beautification Day on April 20, 2013. Booker Arts Magnet School's staff, students, parents, and community partners contributed 37,781.75 volunteer hours from March 1, 2012 through February 28, 2013, averaging 72.1 hours per student. 7 2012 Arkansas School ESEA Accountability Report  District: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Superintendent: MORRIS HOLMES School: BOOKER ARTS MAGNET ELEM. SCH. Principal: CHERYL CARSON LEA: 6001006 Grades: K-05 Address: 2016 BARBER ST. Enrollment: 551 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72206 Attendance Rate: 96.39% (3 QTR AVG) Phone: 501-447-3800 Poverty Rate: 77.50% Needs Improvement School Achieving School Percent Tested # Expected Literacy Literacy # Expected Math Math All Students 273 YES 273 YES Targeted Achievement Gap Group 223 YES 223 YES ESEA Subgroups # Expected Literacy Literacy # Expected Math Math African Americans 165 YES 165 YES Hispanic 32 YES 32 YES White 67 YES 67 YES Economically Disadvantaged 214 YES 214 YES English Learners 27 YES 27 YES Students with Disabilities 29 YES 29 YES Achieving School in Literacy # Attempted Percentage 2012 AMO # Applicable Percentage 2012 AMO 2012 Performance 2012 Growth All Students 270 80.37 73.46 183 90.16 85.42  Targeted Achievement Gap Group 220 77.73 70.21 147 89.12 84.27 Three Year Performance Three Year Growth All Students 811 73.46 537 86.22 85.42 Targeted Achievement Gap Group 627 70.21 414 85.51 84.27 ESEA Subgroups 2012 Perfonmance 2012 Growth African Americans 165 70.24 107 88.79 82.76 Hispanic 31 60.14 21 95.24 88.54 White 66 84.91 48 91.67 89.42 Economically Disadvantaged 211 78.67 70.40 138 89.86 83.66 English Learners 26 80.77 61.80 17 94.12 89.82 Students with Disabilities 29 37.93 22.08 21 66.67 57.70 Needs Improvement School in Math #Attempted Percentage 2012 AMO # Applicable Percentage 2012AMO 2012 Perfonmance 2012 Growth All Students 270 78.29 183 68.23 Targeted Achievement Gap Group 220 76.17 147 66.48 Thre Three Y ar rowth All Students 811 78.29 537 68.23 Targeted Achievement Gap Group 627 76.17 414 66.48 ESEA Subgroups 2012 Perfonmance African Americans 165 74.41 107 65.52 Hispanic 31 80.07 21 54.17 White 66 86.08 48 75.32  Economically Disadvantaged 211 75.65 138 66.61 English Learners 26 77.08 17 64.35 Students with Disabilities 29 45.00 21 50.64 Page 1/1    School Plan BOOKER ARTS MAGNET ELEM. SCH. 2016 BARBER ST., LITTLE ROCK, AR 72206 Arkansas Comprehensive School Improvement Plan 2012-2013 The staff of Joseph R. Booker Arts Magnet School believes and expects that every individual can and will learn. Our mission is to educate all students to higher levels of academic performance, while developing divergent thinking and creativity, promoting physical and emotional wellbeing, and fostering positive growth in social behaviors through integration of the curriculum and the fine and performing arts. In partnership with parents and the community, we accept the responsibility to teach all students with the goal of enabling them to achieve their ultimate educational potential and to equip them to meet the challenges of the Twenty-first century. Grade Span: K-5 Title I: Not Applicable School Improvement: MS Table of Contents Priority 1: Literacy Goal: All students will improve in reading comprehension and written expression, with additional attention to practical reading passages, content and style writing domains, and formulating appropriate responses to open response questions. Goal 2: To narrow the achievement gap between proficient and non-proficient learners in literacy. (Strategic Plan) Goal 3: All Booker Arts Magnet School students will read on grade level by the end of third grade. (Strategic Plan) Priority 2: Mathematics Goal: All students will improve in mathematics computation and problem solving, with additional attention to geometry and measurement, and formulating appropriate responses to open response questions. Goal 2: To narrow the achievement gap between proficient and non-proficient learners in mathematics. (Strategic Plan) 1    Priority 3: Wellness Goal: All students will increase healthy eating habits, practice good hygiene, and engage in fitness activities, as indicated by increases in the attendance rate and percentages of students having ratings of healthy on the BMI. Priority 4: Parental Involvement Goal: All parents/guardians will become engaged in parental involvement activities that will result in increases in student achievement. Priority 1: Supporting Data: Improve Student Achievement in Reading and Writing Literacy 1. ACSIP CRT Data for BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL Augmented Benchmark Exam - Third Grade Literacy Exam 2010 Combined Population: 101 students were tested and 55% scored proficient or advanced. The analysis of the open response and multiple choice questions in the three types of reading passages revealed that the lowest identified areas for Combined students were Content and Practical - multiple choice and Practical - open response. The analysis of the open response questions in the five writing domains revealed that the lowest identified areas were Content and Style. The lowest identified areas for the subpopulations were not available. Augmented Benchmark Exam - Third Grade Literacy Exam 2011 Combined Population: 91 students were tested and 68% scored proficient or advanced. The analysis of the open response and multiple choice questions in the three types of reading passages revealed that the lowest identified areas for Combined students were Content - multiple choice and Practical - open response. An analysis of the responses to the writing prompts indicated the lowest identified areas were the Content and Style domains. The lowest identified areas for Limited English Proficient students and Students with Disabilities were summarizing major points in non-fiction text and recognizing and using variations of print. The lowest identified areas for the other subpopulations were not identified. Augmented Benchmark Exam - Third Grade Literacy Exam 2012 Combined Population: 86 students were tested and 70% scored proficient or advanced. The analysis of the open response and multiple choice questions in the three types of reading passages revealed that the lowest identified areas for Combined students were Practical-multiple choice and Practical-open response. An analysis of the responses to the writing prompts indicated the lowest areas were the Content and Style domains. The lowest identified areas for Limited English Proficient students were drawing inferences\ngenerating questions and checking the text for answers\nand reading the text for a variety of purposes. The lowest identified areas for Students with Disabilities were drawing 2   inferences\ngenerating questions and checking the text for answers\nand editing for usage. The lowest identified areas for the other subpopulations were not available. 2. ACSIP CRT Data for BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL Augmented Benchmark Exam - Fourth Grade Literacy Exam - 2010  Combined Population: 95 students were tested and 69% scored proficient or advanced. The analysis of the open response and multiple-choice questions in the three types of reading passages revealed that the lowest identified areas for Combined students were Literary - multiple choice and Practical - open response. The analysis of the open response questions in the five writing domains revealed that the lowest identified area was Style. The lowest identified areas for the subpopulations were not available. Augmented Benchmark Exam - Fourth Grade Literacy Exam 2011 Combined Population: 102 students were tested and 70% scored proficient or advanced. The analysis of the open response and multiple choice questions in the three types of reading passages revealed that the lowest identified areas for Combined students were Content and Practical - multiple choice and Content and Practical - open response. An analysis of the responses to the writing prompts indicated the lowest identified areas were the Content and Style domains. The lowest identified areas for Limited English Proficient students and Students with Disabilities were making connections from text to self and editing. The lowest identified areas for the other subpopulations were not available. Augmented Benchmark Exam - Fourth Grade Literacy Exam 2012 Combined Population: 90 students were tested and 89% scored proficient or advanced. The analysis of the open response and multiple choice questions in the three types of reading passages reveled that the lowest identified areas for Combined students were Practical - Multiple Choice and Practical - Open Response. An analysis of the responses to the writing prompts indicated the lowest areas were the Content and Style domains. The lowest identified areas for Limited English Proficient students were analyzing and comparing features of genres, spelling, and reading for the text for a variety of purposes. The lowest identified areas for Students with Disabilities were drawing inferences\ngenerating questions and checking the text for answers\nand summarizing-identifying important ideas and details. The lowest identified area for the other subpopulations were not available. 3. ACSIP CRT Data for BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL Augmented Benchmark Exam - Fifth Grade Literacy Exam 2010 Combined Population: 89 students were tested and 72% scored proficient or advanced. The analysis of the open response and multiple choice questions in the three types of reading passages revealed that the lowest identified 3    areas for Combined students were Content - multiple choice and Practical - open response. The analysis of the open response questions in the five writing domains revealed that the lowest identified area was Style. The lowest identified areas for the subpopulations were not available. Augmented Benchmark Exam - Fifth Grade Literacy Exam 2011 Combined Population: 83 students were tested and 76% scored proficient or advanced. The analysis of the open response and multiple choice questions in the three types of reading passages revealed that the lowest identified areas for Combined students were Literary and Content - multiple choice and Literary - open response. An analysis of the responses to the writing prompts indicated the lowest identified areas were the Content and Style domains. The lowest identified areas for Limited English Proficient students and Students with Disabilities were using text features to locate information, editing, and identifying figurative language. The lowest identified areas for the other subpopulations were not available. Augmented Benchmark Exam - Fifth Grade Literacy Exam 2012 Combined Population: 97 students were tested and 82% scored proficient or advanced. The analysis of the open response and multiple choice questions in the three types of reading passages reveled that the lowest identified areas for Combined students were Practical - multiple choice and Literary and Content - open response. An analysis of the responses to the writing prompts indicated the lowest areas were the Content and Style domains. The lowest identified areas for Limited English Proficient students were editing for mechanics, context clues, and summarizingmain ideas and supporting details. The lowest identified areas for Students with Disabilities were editing for mechanics, utilizing background knowledge for comprehension, and summarizing-main ideas and supporting details. The lowest identified areas for the other subpopulations were not available THREE YEAR SUMMARY: An examination of the Augmented Benchmark Literacy Exam results for third through fifth grade students for 2009- 2010, 2010-2011, and 2011-2012 indicated that Combined students had difficulty with the Practical - multiple choice and Practical - open response and Content and Style - writing domains. The lowest identified area for Limited English Proficient students was drawing inferences and supporting them with text evidence. The lowest identified area for Students with Disabilities was editing for usage. The lowest identified areas for the other subpopulations were not available for 2009-2010, 2010-2011, and 2011-2012. 4. Stanford 10 - Grade 5 Total Reading 2010 Combined Population: 89 students were tested and 60.7% scored at or above the 50th percentile. The lowest area for Combined students was Informational - Using Monitoring Strategies. The lowest areas for the subpopulations 4    were not available. Stanford 10 Grade 5 Comprehensive Language - 2010 2010: Combined Population: 89 students were tested and 43% scored at or above the 50th percentile. The lowest area for Combined students was Capitalization - Informative. The lowest areas for the subpopulations were not available. Iowa Test of Basic Skills - Grade 5 Total Reading 2011 Combined Population: 83 students were tested and 35% scored at or above the 50th percentile on the Total Reading test. The lowest area for Combined Students was determining main idea. Limited English Proficient students had the most difficulty with vocabulary and drawing conclusions. Students with Disabilities had the most difficulty with determining main idea, drawing conclusions, and understanding stated information. The lowest identified areas for the other subpopulations were not available. Iowa Test of Basic Skills Grade 5 Total Language 2011 Combined Population: 83 students were tested and 36% scored at or above the 50th percentile on the Total Language test. The lowest area for Combined students was usage and expression. The lowest areas for Limited English Proficient students were usage and expression - verbs and modifiers. The lowest areas for Students with Disabilities were capitalization, use of apostrophes, and usage and expression - modifier. Iowa Test of Basic Skills - Grade 5 Total Reading 2012 Combined Population: 97 students were tested and 36% scored at or above the 50th percentile on the Total Reading test.The lowest identified areas for Combined students were determining main ideas and drawing conclusions. The lowest identified areas for Limited English Proficient students were verbs, drawing conclusions, modifiers, and determining main ideas. The lowest identified areas for Students with Disabilities were understanding stated information, determining main idea, and drawing conclusions. The lowest identified areas for the other subpopulations were not available. Iowa Test of Basic Skills - Grade 5 Total Language 2012 Combined Population: 97 students were tested and 35% scored at or above the 50th percentile on the Total Language test. The lowest identified areas for Combined students were appropriate usage and expression, capitalization of place names, and organization of ideas. The lowest identified areas for Limited English Proficient students were verbs, modifiers, vowels in spelling, and capitalizing place names and names of groups or organizations. The lowest identified areas for Students with Disabilities were suffixes in spelling, over capitalization, use of apostrophes, modifiers, and appropriate usage and expression. The lowest identified areas for other subpopulations were not available 5    5. Stanford 10 Grade 4 Total Reading 2010 Combined Population: 95 students were tested and 65.3% scored at or above the 50th percentile. The lowest area for Combined students was Functional - Explicit Supporting Details. The lowest areas for the subpopulations were not available. Stanford 10 Grade 4 Comprehensive Language 2010 Combined Population: 95 students were tested and 18% scored at or above the 50th percentile. The lowest area for Combined students was Content and Organization - Narrative. The lowest areas for the subpopulations were not available. Iowa Test of Basic Skills - Grade 4 Total Reading 2011 Combined Population: 102 students were tested and 33% scored at or above the 50th percentile on the Total Reading test. The lowest area for Combined and Students with Disabilities was vocabulary - modifier. Limited English Proficient students had the most difficulty with vocabulary - verb. The lowest identified areas for the other subpopulations were not available. Iowa Test of Basic Skills - Grade 4 Total Language 2011 Combined Population: 102 students were tested and 36% scored at or above the 50th percentile on the Total Language test. The lowest area for Combined students was capitalization of names and titles. Limited English Proficient students had the most difficulty with suffixes in spelling. Students with Disabilities had the most difficulty with usage of commas and spelling with consonants. The lowest identified areas for the other subpopulations were not available. Iowa Test of Basic Skills - Grade 4 Total Reading 2012 Combined Population: 90 students were tested and 31 % scored at or above the 50th percentile on the Total reading test. The lowest identified areas for Combined students were modifiers, verbs, and understanding stated information. The lowest identified areas for Limited English Proficient students and Students with Disabilities were verbs, understanding stated information, modifiers, and determining main ideas. The lowest identified areas for other subpopulations were not available. Iowa Test of Basic Skills - Grade 4 Total Language 2012 Combined Population: 90 students were tested and 44% scored at or above the 50th percentile on the Total Language test. The lowest identified areas for Combined students were capitalization of names/titles and 6    organizations/groups, and use of commas. The lowest identified areas for Limited English Proficient were spelling with suffixes and consonants, capitalization of name/title, and comma. The lowest identified areas of other subpopulations were not available. 6. Stanford 10 Grade 3 Total Reading 2010 Combined Population: 101 students were tested and 32.7% scored at or above the 50th percentile. The lowest area for Combined students was Functional - Extending Meaning. The lowest areas for the subpopulations were not available. Stanford 10 Grade 3 Comprehensive Language 2010: Combined Population: 95 students were tested and 17% scored at or above the 50th percentile. The lowest area for Combined students was Punctuation - Narrative. The lowest areas for the subpopulations were not available. Iowa Test of Basic Skills - Grade 3 Total Reading 2011 Combined Population: 91 students were tested and 32% scored at or above the 50th percentile on the Total Reading test. The lowest area for Combined students was vocabulary - modifier. Limited English Proficient Students had the most difficulty with vocabulary - modifier and nouns and drawing conclusion. Students with Disabilities had the most difficulty with inference and interpretation. The lowest identified areas for the other subpopulations were not available. Iowa Test of Basic Skills - Grade 3 Total Language 2011 Combined Population: 91 students were tested and 20% scored at or above the 50th percentile on the Total Language Test. The lowest area for Combined students was spelling - consonants. Limited English Proficient Students had the most difficulty with use of apostrophes and commas. Students with Disabilities had the most difficulty with the use of verbs. The lowest areas for the other subpopulations were not available. Iowa Test of Basic Skills - Grade 3 Total Reading 2012 Combined Population: 86 students were tested and 40% of scored at or above the 50th percentile on the Total Reading test. The lowest identified areas for Combined students were modifiers and understanding stated information. The lowest identified areas for Limited English Proficient students were modifiers, nouns, drawing conclusions, and understanding stated information. The lowest identified areas for Students with Disabilities were inferring motives, understanding stated information, nouns, and modifiers. The lowest identified areas for the other subpopulations were not available. Iowa Test of Basic Skills - Grade 3 Total Language 2012 7    Combined Population: 86 students were tested and 24% scored at or above the 50th percentile on the Total Reading test. The lowest identified areas for Combined students were spelling-consonants and capitalization-writing conventions. The lowest identified areas for Limited English Proficient students were use of apostrophes and commas, spelling-suffixes and consonants, and capitalization-place names and writing conventions. The lowest identified areas for Students with Disabilities were capitalization-place names and writing conventions, usage of verbs, and usage of apostrophes and ending punctuation. The lowest identified areas for other subpopulations were not available. 7. Iowa Test of Basic Skills - Grade 2 Total Reading 2011 Combined Population: 92 were tested and 29% scored at or above the 50th percentile on the Total Reading Test. The lowest areas for Combined students and the subpopulations were not available. Iowa Test of Basic Skills - Grade 2 Total Language 2011 Combined Population: 92 were tested and 20% scored at or above the 50th percentile on the Total Language test. The lowest areas for Combined students and the subpopulations were not available. Iowa Test of Basic Skills - Grade 2 Total Reading 2012 Combined Population: 102 students were tested and 49% scored at or above the 50th percentile on the Total Reading test. The lowest identified areas for Combined students were verbs, modifiers, and factual understanding. The lowest identified areas for the other subpopulations were not available. Iowa Test of Basic Skills - Grade 2 Total Language 2012 Combined Population: 102 students were tested and 33% scored at or above the 50th percentile on the Total Language test. The lowest identified area for Combined students was affixes. The lowest identified areas for the other subpopulations were not available. 8. Iowa Test of Basic Skills - Grade 1 Total Reading 2011 Combined Population: 99 students were tested and 37% scored at or above the 50th percentile on the Total Reading test. The lowest area for Combined students and the subpopulations were not available. Iowa Test of Basic Skills - Grade 1 Total Language 2011 Combined Population: 99 students were tested and 35% scored at or above the 50th percentile on the Total Language test. The lowest areas for Combined students and the subpopulations were not available. 8    Iowa Test of Basic Skills - Grade 1 Total Reading 2012 Combined Population: 94 students were tested and 43% scored at or above the 50th percentile on the Total Reading test. The lowest identified areas for Combined students were factual understanding, inference and interpretation, and analysis and generalization. The lowest identified areas for the other subpopulations were not available. Iowa Test of Basic Skills - Grade 1 Total Language 2012 Combined Population: 94 students were tested and 43% scored at or above the 50th percentile on the Total Language test. The lowest identified areas for Combined students were usage of pronouns and commas. The lowest identified areas for the other subpopulations were not available. 9. Metropolitan 8 Kindergarten Sounds and Print 2010 Combined Population: 90 students were tested and 59% scored at or above the 50th percentile. The lowest areas for Combined students and for the subpopulations were not available. Iowa Test of Basic Skills - Kindergarten Total Reading 2011 Combined Population: 85 were tested and 62% scored at or above the 50th percentile on the Total Reading test. The lowest areas for Combined students and the subpopulations were not available. Iowa Test of Basic Skills - Kindergarten Total Language 2011 Combined Population: 85 were tested and 91 % scored at or above the 50th percentile on the Total Language test. The lowest areas for Combined students and the subpopulations were not available. Kindergarten students were not administered a norm-referenced test in 2011-2012. THREE YEAR SUMMARY An examination of the Stanford 10, Metropolitan 8, and Iowa Test of Basic Skills for kindergarten through fifth grade students for 2009-2010, 2010-2011, and 2011-2012 indicated that Combined students had the most difficulty with capitalization, main idea, and understanding the stated idea. In addition to the lowest areas identified for Combined Students, Limited English Proficient students had the most difficulty with punctuation - apostrophes, modifiers, and verbs. In addition to the lowest areas identified for Combined students, Students with Disabilities had the most difficulty with drawing conclusions and capitalization. The lowest identified areas for the other subpopulations were not available. 9    10. In 2009-2010, the percentage of Combined students reading on or above grade level as indicated by the guided reading text level was 60% in kindergarten, 78% in first grade, and 76% in second grade. The percentage of African American students reading on or above grade level was 49% in kindergarten, 76% in first grade, and 78% in second grade. The percentage of Hispanic students reading on or above grade level was 100% in kindergarten, 60% in first grade, and 57% in second grade. The percentage of Caucasian students reading on or above grade level was 71 % in kindergarten, 84% in first grade, and 77% in second grade. The percentage of Economically Disadvantaged students reading on or above grade level was 48% in kindergarten, 75% in first grade, and 72% in second grade. The percentage of Limited English Proficient students reading on or above grade level was 100% in kindergarten, 67% in first grade, and 43% in second grade. The percentage of Students with Disabilities reading on or above grade level was 45% in kindergarten, 22% in first grade, and 33% in second grade. In 2010-2011, the percentage of Combined students reading on or above grade level as indicated by guided reading text levels was 70% in kindergarten, 79% in first grade, and 65% in second grade. The percentage of African American students reading on or above grade level was 62% in kindergarten, 80% in first grade, and 58% in second grade. The percentage of Hispanic students reading on or above grade level was 78% in kindergarten, 73% in first grade, and 70% in second grade. The percentage of Caucasian students reading on or above grade level was 67% in kindergarten, 83% in first grade, and 84% in second grade. The percentage of Economically Disadvantaged students reading on or above grade level was 62% in kindergarten, 75% in first grade, and 62% in second grade. The percentage of Limited English Proficient students reading on or above grade level was 78% in kindergarten, 86% in first grade, and 75% in second grade. The percentage of Students with Disabilities reading on or above grade level was 29% in kindergarten, 27% in first grade, and 50% in second grade. In 2011-2012, the percentage of Combined students reading on or above grade level as indicated by guided reading text levels was 68% in kindergarten, 65% in first grade, and 70% in second grade. The percentage of African American students reading on or above grade level was 68% in kindergarten, 65% in first grade, and 63% in second grade. The percentage of Hispanic students reading on or above grade level was 43% in kindergarten, 75% in first grade, and 100% in second grade. The percentage of Caucasian students reading on or above grade level was 70% in kindergarten, 61 % in first grade, and 68% in second grade. The percentage of Economically Disadvantaged students reading on or above grade level was 62% in kindergarten, 64% in first grade, and 65% in second grade. The percentage of Limited English Proficient students reading on or above grade levels is 43% in kindergarten, 80% in first grade, and 100% in seoond grade. The percentage of Students with Disabilities reading on or above grade level was 75% in kindergarten, 29% in first grade, and 27% in second grade. THREE YEAR SUMMARY An examination of the guided reading text levels for kindergarten, first and second grade students for 2009-2010, 2010-2011, and 2011-2012, indicated that the percentage of African American students reading on or above grade level did not differ with statistical significance from that of Combined students, with the exception of kindergarten students in 2009-2010 and second grade students in 2010-2011. The percentage of Caucasian students and Economically Disadvantaged students reading on or above grade level was comparable to all students with few exceptions. In some cases, their scores exceeded the scores of their peers. A smaller percentage of Students with Disabilities read on or above grade level than their peers in 2009-2010 and in first and second grades in 2011-2012. 10    11. An analysis of the fifth grade SOAR Literacy assessments for 2011-2012 indicated that 61 % (second quarter), 61 % (third quarter), and 49% (fourth quarter) of Combined students scored proficient. An analysis of African American students scores indicated that 58% (second quarter), 57% (third quarter), and 44% (fourth quarter) scored proficient. An analysis of Hispanic students scores indicated that 54% (second quarter), 62% (third quarter), and 38% (fourth quarter) scored proficient. An analysis of Caucasian students scores indicated that 72% (second quarter), 67% (third quarter) and 61 % (fourth quarter) scored proficient. Data for the other subpopulations was not available. An analysis of the fourth grade SOAR Literacy assessments for 2011-2012 indicated that 55% (second quarter), 54% (third quarter), and 50% (fourth quarter) of Combined students scored proficient. An analysis of African American students scores indicated that 58% (second quarter), 49% (third quarter), and 51 % (fourth quarter) scored proficient. Data was not available on the scores of Hispanic students. An analysis of Caucasian students scores indicated that 59% (second quarter), 63% (third quarter) and 55% (fourth quarter) scored proficient. Data for the other subpopulations was not available. An analysis of the third grade SOAR Literacy assessments for 2011-2012 indicated that 39% (second quarter), 39% (third quarter), and 21 % (fourth quarter) of Combined students scored proficient. An analysis of African American students scores indicated that 32% (second quarter), 30% (third quarter), and 16% (fourth quarter) scored proficient. An analysis of Hispanic students scores indicated that 64% (second quarter) and 45% (fourth quarter) scored proficient. Data was not available on the third quarter scores of Hispanic students. An analysis of Caucasian students scores indicated that 46% (second quarter), 75% (third quarter) and 33% (fourth quarter) scored proficient. Data for the other subpopulations was not available. An analysis of the second grade SOAR Literacy assessments for 2011-2012 indicated that 69% (second quarter), 68% (third quarter), and 57% (fourth quarter) of Combined students scored proficient. An analysis of African American students scores indicated that 57% (second quarter), 61 % (third quarter), and 47% (fourth quarter) scored proficient. Data was not available on the scores of Hispanic students. An analysis of Caucasian students scores indicated that 86% (second quarter), 79% (third quarter) and 68% (fourth quarter) scored proficient. Data for the other subpopulations was not available. An analysis of the first grade SOAR Literacy assessments for 2011-2012 indicated that 84% (second quarter), 66% (third quarter), and 82% (fourth quarter) of Combined students scored proficient. An analysis of African American students scores indicated that 85% (second quarter), 64% (third quarter), and 80% (fourth quarter) scored proficient. An analysis of Hispanic students scores indicated that 73% (second quarter), 58% (third quarter), and 75% (fourth quarter) scored proficient. An analysis of Caucasian students scores indicated that 85% (second quarter), 74% (third quarter) and 89% (fourth quarter) scored proficient. Data for the other subpopulations was not available. One-Year Summary 11    An analysis of the first through fifth grade SOAR Literacy assessments for the second - fourth quarters of 2011-2012 indicated no statistically significant differences between the scores of Combined, African American, Hispanic, and Caucasian students with the following exceptions: African American students in second grade during the second and fourth quarters (lower scores)\n' Hispanic students in first grade during the second quarter (lower scores) and third during the second and fourth quarters (higher scores)\nand Caucasian students in second grade during the second and third quarters, third grade during the third and fourth quarters, and fifth grade during the second and fourth quarters (higher scores). Data for the other subpopulations was not available. 12. In 2009-2010, Booker Arts Magnet School students had an attendance rate of 96.59%. The Third Quarter Average Daily Attendance was 547.35, and the Average Daily Membership was 566.64. In 2010-2011, Booker Arts Magnet School students had an attendance rate of 95.75%. The Third Quarter Average Daily Attendance was 529.99, and the Average Daily membership was 553.49. In 2011-2012, Booker Arts Magnet School students had an attendance rate of 96.40%. The Third Quarter Average Daily Attendance was 530.39, and the Average Daily Membership was 550.15. 13. Booker Arts Magnet School Needs Assessment Narrative The building level review of data included but was not limited to state mandated assessments (Augmented Benchmark Exam and !TBS)\nLittle Rock School District mandated assessments (SOAR)\ngrade level common formative assessments\nperceptual surveys of professional development activities\nclassroom walkthrough data\nand perceptual surveys from parents, students, and teachers\nour analyses suggested areas of strengths (using graphic organizers, using context clues, making inferences, questioning the author's purpose, sentence formation, usage, and mechanics) and areas of need (recognizing expository text features that are sequential and/or comparative, sort relevant and irrelevant information based on the purpose of reading, connecting own background knowledge and personal experience to make inferences and to respond to new information in the text, Practical and Content open response items, and Content and Style writing domains) in our building. To assist us in realizing building level improvement goals, the building level instructional leaders will provide meaningful guidance with classroom walkthroughs, focus walks, and teacher conferencing and support for all staff by providing on-site, ongoing professional development and mentoring from principals and building level coaches who will support teachers' content area needs and in the development and use of effective methods for the delivery of literacy instruction. We will all be accountable for the implementation of the building's selected interventions (tiered activities, programs, and/or processes) that will ensure student and staff learning targets. The greatest areas of need across our Combined student population are reading comprehension and written expression in the areas of Practical and Content open response and Content and Style writing domains. Also, our various subpopulations have additional deficiencies. Our African American, Hispanic, Economically Disadvantaged, and Limited English Proficient students are weaker in Practical open response items and Content and Style writing domains. Finally, our Students with Disabilities and Caucasian students struggle with Content and Practical open response items and Content and Style writing domains. In the area of literacy, our Combined student population 12    scored lower (80.37% proficient or advanced) than similar groups within the state (84.0% proficient or advanced) and higher than the district (74.3% proficient or advanced). Our African American students, Limited English Proficient students, Hispanic students, and Economically Disadvantaged students scored higher than similar groups within the district and the state. Our Combined student population scored higher than the district but lower than the state. However, there is not a significant achievement gap between our African American (78.18% proficient or advanced) students as compared to their Caucasian peers (84.85% proficient or advanced). 77.7% of our Target Achievement Gap Group scored proficient or advanced. The Little Rock School District's Language Arts Core Curriculum is rigorous, standards-based, appropriately paced, regularly assessed and aligned to the Arkansas Curriculum Frameworks. Our student data along with our professional development surveys revealed the following areas of need within our combined population: reading comprehension and written expression in the areas of Practical and Content open response and Content and Style writing domains. These areas of need indicate that there are Core Literacy instructional weaknesses. We will address reading comprehension and written expression in the areas of Practical and Content open response and Content and Style writing domains by (a) aligning our professional development to support this area\n(b) realigning human resources (literacy/instructional coaches) to support those individual teachers who are experiencing the most difficulty in delivering instruction in reading comprehension and written expression in the areas of Practical and Content open response and Content and Style writing domains as evidenced by student scores on common formative assessments, classroom walkthroughs and/or focus walks, (c) ensure targeted planning to make sure that the fidelity of Core Literacy instructional practices are in place\n(d) having designated learning targets\n(e) teachers will provide grade level instruction built on \"best\" instructional \"practices\" (i.e., differentiated instruction)\nand (f) when students have difficulty reaching their designated learning targets based on progress monitoring, they will receive supplemental, tiered instructional interventions. 14. EVALUATIONS OF INTERVENTIONS READING RECOVERY Reading Recovery services have been provided to underachieving students at Booker Arts Magnet School for eleven years. Reading Recovery focuses on providing intensive intervention services to the lowest 20% of all first grade students, as identified by the Developmental Reading Assessment, Observation Survey, and Kindergarten Alternate Ranking sheets. Individualized instruction is provided to identified students for at least 30 minutes daily. The daily instruction and frequent assessments allow Reading Recovery teachers to provide instruction that is both diagnostic and prescriptive, targeting the students' specific weaknesses in word attack skills, comprehension, fluency, vocabulary, and writing. An examination of guided reading text levels from 2009-2010, 2010-2011, and 2011-2012 indicated that 42% of first grade through filth grade students receiving services from Reading Recovery teachers were proficient. In addition, students with weaknesses in reading comprehension and fluency received instruction from Reading Recovery teachers in a small group setting (three to five students) for at least 40 minutes each day. COMPREHENSIVE LITERACY PROGRAM A Comprehensive Literacy Program has been implemented at Booker Arts Magnet School for the past nine years. All kindergarten through filth grade literacy teachers, the Literacy Coach, Instructional Coach, Drama Specialists, 13  Goal Benchmark   Reading Recovery Teachers, and administrators have demonstrated their commitment to the instructional practices learned in ELLA, Effective Literacy, and Literacy Lab as evidenced by their completion of the required professional development for ELLA, Effective Literacy, and/or Literacy Lab. An examination of Augmented Benchmark Exam scores and guided reading text levels from the 2009-2010, 2010-2011, and 2011-2012 school years demonstrated an increase in the number of students scoring proficient or advanced or meeting the grade level standard. When comparing Augmented Benchmark Exam scores of the same groups of students from the 2009-2010, 2010-2011, and 2011-2012 school years, Combined students and subpopulations (with the exception of Hispanic students with 100% and Students with Disabilities in 2010-2011) increased the percentage of students scoring proficient or advanced with increases ranging from 2.5% to 26.5%. DIFFERENTIATION OF INSTRUCTION The Differentiation of Instruction Intervention has been implemented at Booker Arts Magnet School for four years. Academic Improvement Plans, Intensive Reading Intervention, 504 Plans, and Individualized Education Plans were developed collaboratively with parents of identified students. Limited English Proficient students received instruction from teachers who participated in English-as-a-Second Language training. SOAR test data was disaggregated alter each assessment and utilized to plan re-teaching. The School-Based Intervention Team met seventeen days during 2009-2010, sixteen days during 2010-2011, and eighteen days during 2011-2012 to monitor the progress of students receiving Tier II and Tier III Interventions. Ninety-two Gilted and Talented students were served by two Gilted and Talented teachers in 2011-2012. Camp Jaguar (alter-school tutoring program) was provided to 122 students in 2009-2010, 98 students in 2010-2011, and 86 students in 2011-2012 scoring basic or below basic on the Literacy portion of the Augmented Benchmark Exam. 62% of third grade students, 100% of fourth grade students, and 69% of filth grade students in the after-school tutoring program scored proficient or advanced or made the necessary scale score growth to be counted as proficient during 2009-2010. 62% of third grade students, 70% of fourth grade students, and 69% of filth grade students scored proficient or advanced or made the necessary scale score growth to be counted as proficient during the 2010-2011 school year. 57% of third grade students, 90% of fourth grade students, and 67% of fifth grade students scored proficient or advanced or made the scale score growth necessary to be counted as proficient in 2011-2012. All students will improve in reading comprehension and written expression, with additional attention to practical reading passages, content and style writing domains, and formulating appropriate responses to open response questions. Goal 2: To narrow the achievement gap between proficient and non-proficient learners in literacy. (Strategic Plan) Goal 3: All Booker Arts Magnet School students will read on grade level by the end of third grade. (Strategic Plan) To increase the number of third, fourth, and filth grade students scoring \"proficient\" or \"advanced\" on the Augmented Benchmark Exam by the percentages listed to the following AMOs for each group by the end of the 2012-2013 school year: 14  Performance: All students to 75.88% TAGG students to 72.92% All African American students to 72. 94% All Hispanic students to 63. 77% All Caucasian students to 86.28% All Economically Disadvantaged students to 73.09% All Limited English Proficient students to 65.28% All Students with Disabilities to 29.17%. Growth: All students to 86. 74% TAGG students to 85.70% All African American students to 84.33% All Hispanic students to 89.58% All Caucasian students to 90.38% All Economically Disadvantaged students to 85.14 All Limited English Proficient students to 90. 74% All Students with Disabilities to 61.54%.  The ESEA Accountability status for the Combined students and all subpopulations was Achieving. Intervention: READING RECOVERY - Tier II and Tier III Interventions PROGRAM EVALUATION: Effectiveness of Tier II and Tier III interventions will be determined by 15-20% of students having a composite score of 70% or greater on the quarterly SOAR assessment. Scientific Based Research: \"Reading Recovery. (2008) Report of the What Works Clearing House : Institute of Education Sciences: US Department of Education.  Glasswell, K. and M. Ford. (2010) \"Teaching Flexibility with Leveled Texts: More Power for Your Reading Block.\" The Reading Teacher. Volume 64, Number 1: 59-60. \"2011-2012 Reading Recovery Statistical Abstract for the U.S.\" Report of the International Data Evaluation Center. Ohio State University. Actions ,Person Responsible JTimeline rResources Source of Funds 15    Provide professional development for all Reading Cheryl Carson, Principal Start:  District Staff General Recovery teachers such as Continuing Contact 08/14/2012  Outside Revenue: $500.00 sessions, the Literacy Conference, and Parental End: Consultants Involvement. 06/06/2013 ACTION BUDGET: $500 Action Type: Alignment Action Type: Professional Development Select and purchase materials for Reading Mary Lou Alley, Start:  District Staff General Recovery teachers such as leveled books, Instructional Coach 08/01/2012  Teachers Revenue: $500.00 consumable materials, and LLI sets. End: 06/13/2013 ACTION BUDGET: $500 Action Type: Alignment Action Type: Collaboration Utilize Observation Survey and Kindergarten Cheryl Carson, Principal Start:  District Staff alternate ranking sheets to identify first grade 08/15/2012  Outside ACTION students for Reading Recovery services. (Tier III) End: $ Consultants BUDGET: 06/05/2013  Performance Action Type: AIP/IRI Assessments Action Type: Equity Utilize ITBS and Augmented Benchmark Exam Cheryl Carson, Principal\nStart:  District Staff results to identify kindergarten, first, second, Ruth Keogh, Literacy and 05/15/2012  Outside ACTION third, fourth, and fifth grade students with Math Teacher End: $ Consultants BUDGET: reading deficits for Literacy Groups.(Tier II) 06/05/2013  Performance Assessments Action Type: AIP/IRI Action Type: Equity Collaborate with staff and parents to develop and Cheryl Carson, Principal\nStart:  Central Office implement AIPs, IRis, and 504 plans for students Mary McMorran, Resource 08/15/2012  District Staff ACTION working below grade level. Teacher\nTammy Higdon, End:  $ Performance BUDGET: Reading Recovery Teacher\n06/05/2013 Assessments Tamara Ringler, 504 Action Type: AIP/IRI  Teachers Action Type: Collaboration Action Type: Parental Engagement Action Type: Special Education Utilize appropriately leveled texts based on Tammy Higdon, Reading Start:  School Library student !nterest !n Readino. Recoven.1 instruction Recoverv Teacher nRnnnn17 16    to develop vocabulary, to increase fluency, and to End:  Teaching Aids ACTION maintain interest in reading.(Tier III) 06/30/2013 BUDGET: $ Action Type: AIP/IRI Action Type: Alignment Review Running Records daily to monitor the Tammy Higdon, Reading Start:  District Staff progress of students receiving Reading Recovery Recovery Teacher 08/20/2012  Outside ACTION services. (Tier III) End: $ Consultants BUDGET: 06/05/2013  Performance Action Type: AIP/IRI Assessments Action Type: Program Evaluation  Teaching Aids Monitor the text levels of students receiving Cheryl Carson, Principal Start:  District Staff Reading Recovery and Literacy Group services on 08/20/2012  Performance ACTION an ongoing basis. End: $ Assessments BUDGET: 06/05/2013  Teaching Aids Action Type: AIP/IRI Action Type: Collaboration Action Type: Parental Engagement Action Type: Special Education Participate in monthly School-Based Intervention Tammy Higdon, Reading Start:  District Staff Team meetings to assess students being progress Recovery Teacher\nCheryl 08/20/2012  Outside ACTION monitored or receiving Tier II or Tier III Carson, Principal End: $ Consultants BUDGET: instruction. 06/05/2013  Teachers  Teaching Aids Action Type: AIP/IRI Action Type: Collaboration Action Type: Special Education Schedule and conduct conferences with parents of Tammy Higdon, Reading Start:  Centra I Office students receiving Reading Recovery instruction Recovery Teacher 08/20/2012  District Staff ACTION concerning progress. (Tier III) End: $  Performance BUDGET: 06/05/2013 Assessments Action Type: AIP/IRI  Teachers Action Type: Collaboration Action Type: Parental Engagement Action Type: Special Education 17    Send books home with students and encourage Tammy Higdon, Reading Start:  School Library parents to read with their children each night. Recovery Teacher 08/20/2012 ACTION End: BUDGET: $ 06/06/2013 Action Type: Collaboration Action Type: Parental Engagement Compare pre- and post-test results of Slosson Cheryl Carson, Principal\nStart:  Performance Oral Reading Test scores and Observation Survey Tammy Higdon, Reading 01/31/2013 Assessments ACTION results of Reading Recovery students at the end Recovery Teacher End:  $ Teachers BUDGET: of their 20-week program to assess the 06/06/2013 effectiveness of Reading Recovery instruction. Action Type: Collaboration Action Type: Program Evaluation Compare the pre- and post-HMH unit assessment Cheryl Carson, Principal Start:  Performance results, Slosson Oral Reading Test scores, and 05/31/2013 Assessments ACTION reading text levels to assess the effectiveness of End:  $ Teachers BUDGET: Literacy Group Instruction. (Tier III) 06/06/2013 Action Type: Collaboration Action Type: Program Evaluation Utilize literature in Literacy Group instruction to Tammy Higdon, Reading Start:  School Library develop vocabulary, to increase fluency, and to Recovery Teacher 08/20/2012  Teaching Aids ACTION maintain interest in reading.(Tier II) End: BUDGET: $ 06/05/2013 Action Type: AIP/IRI Action Type: Alignment Write a school-based Reading Recovery report on Tammy Higdon, Reading Start:  Outside the results of students served. Provide copies of Recovery Teacher 05/17/2013 Consultants ACTION the report to the principal and District Teacher End:  $ Teachers BUDGET: Leader for dissemination at the district level and 06/06/2013 to assess the effectiveness of Reading Recovery and Literacy Group instruction. Action Type: Program Evaluation 18  Provide daily reading and writing instruction for identified students.(TIER III) Action Type: AIP/IRI Action Type: Equity  Tammy Higdon, Reading Recovery Teacher Start: 08/20/2012 End: 06/05/2013  Teaching Aids ACTION BUDGET:  $ Total Budget: $1000 Intervention: COMPREHENSIVE LITERACY PROGRAM - Tier I Intervention All students at Booker Arts Magnet School will have access to and be engaged with a rigorous standards-based Language Arts Core Curriculum that is appropriately paced and regularly assessed. Students will have designated learning targets and teachers will provide grade level instruction built on \"best instructional practices\". When students have difficulty reading their designated learning targets, the instructional staff at Booker Arts Magnet School will support them with supplemental, tiered instruction. PROGRAM EVALUATION: Effectiveness of Tier I interventions will be determined by 80% of students having a composite score of 70% or greater on the quarterly SOAR assessment. Scientific Based Research: Wolk, S. (2010) \"What Should Students Read?\" Phi Delta Kappan, Volume 91, Number 7: 9-16. Bryk, A. (2010) \"Organizing Schools for Improvement\". Phi Delta Kappan, Volume 91, Number 7: 23-30. Cowan, D. (2009) \"Creating a Community of Professional Learners: An Inside View\". SEDL Letter, Volume 21, Number 1: 20-25. Flowers, N. and D. Carpenter. (2009) \"You Don't Have to Be a Statistician to Use Data: A Process for Data-Based Decision Making in Schools\". Phi Delta Kappan, Volume 91, Number 2: 64-67. Fogarty, R. and B. Pete. (2010) \"Professional Learning 101: A Syllabus of Seven Protocols.\" Phi Delta Kappan, Volume 91, Number 4: 32-34. Higgins, M, L. Young, J. Weiner, and S. Wlodarczyk. (2010) \"Leading Teams of Leaders: What Helps Team Member Learning?\" Phi Delta Kappan, Volume 91, Number 4: 41-45. Saphier, J. and L. West (2010). \"How Coaches Can Maximize Student Learning\". Phi Delta Kappan, Volume 91, Number 4: 46-50. Jacobson, D. (2010) \"Coherent Instructional Improvement and PLCs: Is it Possible to Do Both?\". Phi Delta Kappan, Volume 91, Number 6: 38-45. Actions Provide professional development for kindergartenfifth grade teachers such as ELLA, Effective Literacy, Person Responsible Timeline Resources Cheryl Carson, Principal Start:  District Staff 08/14/2012  outsidP. 19 Source of Funds General Revenue: $0.00    Literacy Lab, Step Up to Writing, Daily Five, and End: Consultants Arkansas History (for those teaching the content). 06/06/2013 ACTION BUDGET: $0 Action Type: Alignment Action Type: Professional Development Provide professional development for the Literacy Cheryl Carson, Principal Start:  Outside General Coach such as Coaches' LRSD Coaches Meetings, the 08/07/2012 Consultants Revenue: $500.00 Literacy Conference, Parental Involvement, and End: Professional Learning Communities. 06/13/2013 ACTION BUDGET: $500 Action Type: Collaboration Action Type: Professional Development Utilize literacy coach to assist teachers in Susan Blue, Literacy Start:  Teaching Aids implementing instructional strategies learned in Coach 08/15/2012 ACTION BUDGET: $ ELLA, Effective Literacy, and Literacy Lab in End: classrooms. 06/06/2013 Action Type: Alignment Action Type: Collaboration Action Type: Professional Development Utilize consultants to model effective instructional Cheryl Carson, Principal Start:  District Staff strategies learned in ELLA, Effective Literacy, and 08/15/2012  Outside ACTION BUDGET: $ Literacy Lab strategies for classroom teachers such End: Consultants as Sabrina Stout, Dr. Betsy Kaye, and Karen James. 06/06/2013 Action Type: Collaboration Action Type: Professional Development Purchase textbooks for participants in ELLA, Effective Lou Alley, Instructional Start:  District Staff General Literacy, and Literacy Lab for training. Purchase Coach 07/01/2012 Revenue: $500.00 professional texts to support utilization of curriculum End: maps. 09/28/2012 ACTION BUDGET: $500 Action Type: Alignment Select and purchase leveled books and big books for Lou Alley, Instructional Start:  District Staff General kindergarten and first grade teachers to utilize while Coach 07/01/2012  Teachers Revenue: $1000.00 imolementing strategies learned in ELLA and the End: 20    LRSD Literacy Curriculum Maps. 06/30/2013 ACTION BUDGET: $1000 Action Type: Alignment Action Type: Collaboration Select and purchase sets of novels for second-fifth Lou Alley, Instructional Start:  District Staff General grade teachers to utilize while implementing Coach 07/01/2012  Teachers Revenue: $1000.00 strategies learned in Effective Literacy, Literacy Lab, End: and the LRSD Literacy Curriculum maps. 06/06/2013 ACTION BUDGET: $1000 Action Type: Alignment Action Type: Collaboration Select and purchase books for use in kindergarten Lou Alley, Instructional Start:  Teachers General through fifth grade classroom libraries to implement Coach 07/01/2012 Revenue: $1000.00 strategies learned in ELLA, Effective Literacy and End: Literacy Lab and the LRSD curriculum maps. 06/06/2013 ACTION BUDGET: $1000 Action Type: Alignment Action Type: Collaboration Select and purchase fiction and nonfiction texts for Susan Blue, Literacy Start:  Teaching Aids General student use in the Media Center and classroom Coach and Krystal 07/01/2012 Revenue: $1000.00 libraries focusing on nonfiction in the intermediate Henderson, Media End: grades. Specialist 06/06/2013 ACTION BUDGET: $1000 Action Type: Collaboration Action Type: Equity Administer HMH Comprehensive Screening Micaela Battles, Loretta Start:  Performance Assessment or Emerging Literacy Survey to students Ellington, Courtney 08/15/2012 Assessments ACTION BUDGET: $ to identify instructional level for literacy. If Gasper, Jane Harkey, End: necessary, follow up with diagnostic assessments. Theresa Ibekwe, 10/05/2013 Shirley Marshall- Classroom Teachers Action Type: Alignment Provide a two hour uninterrupted literacy block for Cheryl Carson, Principal Start:  District Staff kindergarten through fifth grade students to insure 08/20/2012 ACTION BUDGET: $ adequate time to implement the Comprehensive End: Literacy Program. 06/06/2013 21   I Action Type: Collaboration 1 Utilize HMH weekly assessments and runn~g- records !Ve~rlon Jeffrie~, Mi~aela Start: - ,to assess the decoding skills, fluency, !Battles, Loretta 1 08/20/2012 ,comprehension, and vocabulary acquisition of Ellington, Shirley End: 'kindergarten-second grade students as identified in IMarsha\\1-Classroom 06/05/2013 'Curriculum Maps.. 1Teachers Action Type: Program Evaluation Collaborate with staff and parents to develop and implement Intensive Reading Interventions and Academic Improvement Plans to focus on the needs of students working below grade level. IAction Type: AIP/IRI Action Type: Collaboration Action Type: Parental Engagement Collaborate with staff and parents to develop and implement IEPs and 504 plans to focus on the needs 1of identified students. Action Type: Collaboration Action Type: Parental Engagement Action Type: Special Education Conduct monthly Literacy Team meetings with kindergarten-filth grade teachers to review curriculum maps, score common formative assessments, and disaggregate assessment data. Action Type: Alignment Action Type: Collaboration Schedule and conduct no less than two conferences with the parents of all students to discuss progress, including students with AIPs, IRis, IEPs, and 504 plans. Cheryl Carson, Principal and Ruth Keogh, Literacy and Math !Teacher I I IM-\nry Mc:Morran and\nShirley Marshall, Resource\nSteve McGuire, Speech\nTamara Ringler, 504 Coordinator Susan Blue, Literacy Coach Mary McMorran, Vearlon Jeffries, Micaela Battles, Loretta ! Ellington, Courtney Gasper, Jane Harkey, Start: 08/20/2012 End: 06/05/2013 Start: 108/20/2012 End: 06/05/2013 Start: 08/20/2012 End: 06/06/2013 Start: 08/20/2012 End: 06/06/2013       Performance Assessments Community Leaders District Staff Community Leaders District Staff Teachers  I ACTION BUDGET: $ I ACTION BUDGET: $ ACTION BUDGET: $ ACTION BUDGET: $ ACTION BUDGET: $ I ------------- Darrell Havden ----------------~---------- J 22  Action Type: AIP/IRI Action Type: Collaboration Action Type: Parental Engagement Provide instruction utilizing instructional strategies learned in ELLA such as Read Aloud, Shared Reading, Guided Reading, Familiar Reading, Literacy Corners, Turn and Talk, and Classroom Libraries for all kindergarten and first grade students. Action Type: AIP/IRI Action Type: Equity  Vearlon Jeffries, Kindergarten Teacher\nMicaela Battle, First Grade Teacher Provide instruction utilizing instructional strategies Loretta Ellington, learned in Effective Literacy and Literacy Lab such as Courtney Gasper, Jane Word Sorts, Book Talks, Poetry, Writing Workshop, Harkey, Theresa Reading Workshop, Guided Reading, Daily Oral Ibekwe, Shirley Language Activities, Read Alouds, Turn and Talk, and Marshall-Classroom Classroom Libraries for all second through fifth grade Teachers students. Action Type: AIP/IRI Action Type: Equity Utilize STAR Assessment to identify first through filth grade students' independent reading levels to guide students in self-selecting texts for motivation and before and alter school reading. Action Type: Equity Action Type: Technology Inclusion Provide kindergarten through filth grade students with models of good readers such as Book Talks, VIPS Reading Day, and the Parent Resource Center. Action Type: Collaboration Action Type: Parental Engagement Krystal Henderson, Media Specialist Susan Blue, Literacy Coach and Krystal Henderson, Media Specialist Utilize strategies to encourage student self-selection Cheryl Carson, of books, such as Book Clubs, book talks during Principal\nKrystal morn!no.a nnouncements.A .cce!eratedR eader. Henderson. Media_ 23 Start: 08/20/2012 End: 06/06/2013 Start: 08/20/2012 End: 06/06/2013 Start: 08/20/2012 End: 06/05/2013 Start: 08/20/2012 End: 06/06/2013 Start: 08/20/2012 End:           District Staff Teaching Aids District Staff Teaching Aids Performance Assessments Community Leaders District Staff School Library Teachers School Library  ACTION BUDGET: $ ACTION BUDGET: $ ACTION BUDGET: $ ACTION BUDGET: $ ACTION BUDGET: $    reading to students daily, VIPS Reading Day, Million Specialist 06/05/2013 Minutes, and Book Fairs. Action Type: Equity Action Type: Technology Inclusion Identify and implement strategies to increase Susan Blue, Literacy Start:  District Staff vocabulary development across all curriculum areas. Coach and Lou Alley, 08/20/2012 ACTION BUDGET: $ Instructional Coach End: 06/05/2013 Action Type: Alignment Action Type: Equity Identify and implement strategies such as the use of Susan Blue, Literacy Start:  District Staff an age appropriate checklist for test-taking Coach and Lou Alley, 08/20/2012 ACTION BUDGET: $ strategies to assist second through fifth grade Instructional Coach End: students in identifying the tasks in a selection, 06/05/2013 accessing given knowledge, and developing an accurate response to open response items and kindergarten and first grade students in listening skills and appropriate test taking strategies. Action Type: AIP/IRI Action Type: Alignment Provide students with sufficient practice with the Micaela Battles, Jane Start:  Performance vocabulary and format of the criterion-referenced Harkey, Theresa 08/20/2012 Assessments ACTION BUDGET: $ and norm-referenced tests, such as utilizing the Ibekwe-Classroom End: Released Items and HMH materials. Teachers 06/05/2013 Action Type: AIP/IRI Action Type: Equity Provide SOAR assessments three times yearly Cheryl Carson, Principal Start:  Performance (October, December, and February) to assess 10/17/2012 Assessments ACTION BUDGET: $ students' mastery of standards listed on the LRSD End: curriculum map. 02/28/2013 Action Type: Alignment Action Type: Program Evaluation Identify students with less than 70% mastery of Susan Blue, Literacy Start:  Performance 24    standards as measured by SOAR assessments. Coach 10/19/2012 Assessments ACTION BUDGET: $ End: 03/05/2013 Action Type: AIP/IRI Action Type: Alignment Reteach students demonstrating less than 70% Vearlon Jeffries, Micaela Start:  Performance mastery of standards on SOAR assessment. Battles, Loretta 10/23/2012 Assessments ACTION BUDGET: $ Ellington, Courtney End:  Teaching Aids Gasper, Jane Harkey, 03/29/2013 Action Type: AIP/IRI Theresa Ibekwe, Action Type: Alignment Shirley Marshall Action Type: Equity Integrate literacy instruction into the math, science, Vearlon Jeffries, Micaela Start:  District Staff social studies, and fine arts areas to strengthen Battles, Loretta 08/20/2012 ACTION BUDGET: $ content knowledge. Ellington, Courtney End: Gasper, Jane Harkey, 06/05/2013 Theresa Ibekwe, Action Type: Alignment Shirley Marshall Action Type: Collaboration Utilizing the LRSD curriculum maps and Arkansas Krystal Henderson, Start:  Teaching Aids Library Media Frameworks, provide library lessons to Media Specialist 08/20/2012 ACTION BUDGET: $ correlate with kindergarten through fi~h grade End: literacy instruction. 06/05/2013 Action Type: Alignment Action Type: Equity Utilize Edline and Progress Report cards to inform Cheryl Carson, Principal Start:  Computers parents of their children's progress in literacy 08/20/2012  Performance ACTION BUDGET: $ weekly. End: Assessments 06/05/2013 Action Type: Parental Engagement Distribute Summer Reading Lists to all students. Lou Alley, Instructional Start:  Teachers Coach 06/05/2013 ACTION BUDGET: $ End: Action Type: Parental Engagement 06/05/2013 Compare the guided reading text level results Cheryl Carson, Principal Start:  Performance quarterly to assess the effectiveness of 06/07/2013 Assessments ACTION BUDGET: $ implementing a Comprehensive Literacy. ,End: 25  Action Type: Program Evaluation Analyze disaggregated !TBS test results for first grade through fifth grade students to identify the percentage of students scoring at or above the 50th percentile on the Reading Comprehension Subtest and to assess the effectiveness of implementing Comprehensive Literacy. Action Type: Program Evaluation Analyze disaggregated Augmented Benchmark Exam results for third through fifth grade students to determine the percentage of students scoring \"proficient\" or \"advanced\" and to assess the implementation of Comprehensive Literacy. Action Type: Program Evaluation Conduct classroom walk through observations, informal observations, and formal observations to assess the effectiveness of Comprehensive Literacy. Action Type: Program Evaluation Create Professional Learning Communities at each grade level to conduct weekly Common Planning Periods, focusing on reviewing curriculum maps and examining assessment data from teacher made tests. Action Type: Collaboration Total Budget:  06/14/2013 Cheryl Carson, Principal Start: 06/14/2013 End: 06/28/2013 Cheryl Carson, Principal Start: 06/14/2013 End: 06/28/2013 Cheryl Carson, Principal Start: 08/20/2012 End: 06/05/2013 Cheryl Carson, Principal Start: 08/15/2012 End: 06/30/2013 Intervention: DIFFERENTIATION OF INSTRUCTION - Tier II and Tier III Interventions    Performance Assessments Performance Assessments Teachers  ACTION BUDGET: $ ACTION BUDGET: $ ACTION BUDGET: $ ACTION BUDGET: $ $5000 PROGRAM EVALUATION: Effectiveness of Tier I interventions will be determined by 80% of students having a composite score of 70% or greater on the quarterly SOAR assessment. 26    Scientific Based Research: Carbo, M. (2009) \"Match the Style of Instruction to the Style of Reading\". Phi Delta Kappan, Volume 90, Number 5: 373-378. Demski, J. (2009) \"Assess. Instruct. Repeat.\" The Journal, Volume 36, Number 5: 30-36. Levin, H. (2008) \"The Achievement Gap: Helping African American Males.\" Teacher Professional Development Sourcebook. Bethesda, MD: Editorial Projects in Education, Inc. Muoneke, A. and L. Shankland. (2009) \"Using Tiered Intervention to Improve High School Performance\". SEDL Letter, Volume 21, Number 1: 5-12. Murphy, J. (2009) \"Closing Achievement Gaps: Lessons from the Last 15 Years\". Phi Delta Kappan, Volume 91, Number 3: 8-12. Reichert, M. and R. Hawley (2010) \"Reaching Boys: an International Study of Effective Teaching Practices.\" Phi Delta Kappan, Volume 91, Number 4: 35-40. Flowers, N. and D. Carpenter. (2009) \"You Don't Have to Be a Statistician to Use Data: A Process for Data-Based Decision Making in Schools\". Phi Delta Kappan, Volume 91, Number 2: 64-67. Harris, Bryan, Plucker, Jonathan A., Rapp, Kelly E., * Martinez, Rebecca S (2009). Identifying Gifted and Talented English Language learners: A Case Study. Journal for the Education of the Gilted, V 32, Number 3. Tomlinson, Carol, A. \u0026amp; Imbeau, Marcia B. (2010). a Differentiated Classroom. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Actions Disaggregate Augmented Benchmark Exam, ITBS, and QELI data to identify kindergartenfifth grade students scoring \"basic\" or \"below basic.\" Action Type: AIP/IRI Action Type: Collaboration Person Responsible Timeline Cheryl Carson, Principal Start: 08/20/2012 End: 09/14/2013 Utilize \"Item by Item Selections of Correct Cheryl Carson, Principal Start: 08/20/2012 End: 09/14/2013 Answers\" Report (Augmented Benchmark Exam and ITBS) to identify skills in which 75% or fewer of students answered correctly and inform sti:!ff i:!nd r:\u0026gt;i:!rentso f these ski!!s. 27 Resources  Performance Assessments  Teachers  Performance Assessments Source of Funds ACTION BUDGET: ACTION BUDGET: $ $ J    Action Type: Alignment Collaborate with staff and parents to develop Cheryl Carson, Principal !Start:  Performance and implement Intensive Reading Interventions and Ruth Keogh, 08/20/2012 Assessments ACTION BUDGET: $ and Academic Improvement Plans to focus on Literacy and Math End: the needs of students working below grade Teacher 06/05/2013 level. Action Type: AIP/IRI Action Type: Collaboration Action Type: Parental Engagement Provide common planning periods for grade Cheryl Carson, Principal Start:  District Staff level to develop strategies to address the needs 08/15/2012  Teachers ACTION BUDGET: $ of students with AIPs, IEPs, IRis, and 504 End: plans. 06/05/2013 Action Type: AIP/IRI Action Type: Collaboration Utilize instructional strategies to differentiate Vearlon Jeffries, Loretta Start:  District Staff instruction for kindergarten through fifth grade Ellington, Jane Harkey, 08/20/2012  Teaching Aids ACTION BUDGET: $ students, such as learning contracts, reading Theresa Ibekwe, D. J. End: buddies, flexible grouping, curriculum Ramsey, Chris Henry, 06/05/2013 compacting, learning centers, small group Mariah Reescano targeted instruction, and independent study. (Tier II) Action Type: AIP/IRI Action Type: Equity Provide SOAR assessments three times yearly Cheryl Carson, Principal Start:  Performance (October, December, and February) to assess 110/17/2012 Assessments ACTION BUDGET: $ students' mastery of standards listed on the End: LRSD curriculum map. 02/28/2012 Action Type: Alignment Action Type: Program Evaluation Identify students scoring less than 70% Susan Blue. Literacy Start:  Performance 28    mastery of standards as measured by SOAR Coach 10/23/2012 Assessments ACTION BUDGET: $ assessments. End: 03/05/2013 Action Type: AIP/IRI Action Type: Alignment Reteach students demonstrating less than 70% Vearlon Jeffries, Micaela Start:  Teaching Aids mastery of standards on SOAR assessment. Battles, Dixie Fair, 08/20/2012 ACTION BUDGET: $ Courtney Gasper, Jane End: Harkey, Theresa 06/05/2013 Action Type: AIP/IRI Ibekwe-Classroom Action Type: Alignment Teachers Action Type: Equity Schedule and conduct no less than two Vearlon Jeffries, Micaela Start:  Community conferences with the parents of all students to Battles, Loretta 08/20/2012 Leaders ACTION BUDGET: $ discuss progress, including students with AIPs, Ellington, Courtney End:  Performance IRis, IEPs, and 504 plans. Gasper, Jane Harkey, 06/05/2013 Assessments Theresa Ibekwe- Classroom Teachers Action Type: AIP/IRI Action Type: Collaboration Action Type: Parental Engagement Conduct after school tutoring sessions for Cheryl Carson, Principal\nStart:  Computers General students on \"targeted\" skills. (Tier II) Mary Lou Alley, 09/25/2012  Performance Revenue: $7500.00 Instructional Coach\nD. End: Assessments J. Ramsey, Mariah 03/15/2013 NSLA Action Type: Alignment Reescano, and Chris  Teachers (State-281)  Teaching Aids - Employee $28725.00 Action Type: Technology Inclusion Henry, Fine Art Salaries: NSLA (State-281) $8775.00 - Employee Benefits: ACTION BUDGET: $45000 Provide instruction to support language Joni Thomas, Amy Start:  District Staff acquisition for Limited English Proficient Hallum, Kim Lang, 108/20/2012  Performance ACTION BUDGET: $ students by implementing the ELP frameworks. Courtney Gasper, Lauren End: Assessments Malm, Jane Harkey, and 06/05/2013 Ruth Keoo.h-ESL Trairied 29    Action Type: AIP/IRI Teachers Action Type: Equity Provide instruction to enrich and extend Heather Theodore and Start:  District Staff learning for gifted and talented students. Rachel Morris, Gifted 08/20/2012  Teachers ACTION BUDGET: $ and Talented Teachers End: 06/05/2013 Action Type: Alignment Action Type: Equity Provide instruction to address the needs Mary McMorran, Start:  Performance identified in IEPs for Students with Disabilities. Resource\nSteve 08/20/2012 Assessments ACTION BUDGET: $ (Tier III) McGuire, Speech\nGina End:  Teachers Goad, OT\nShirley 06/05/2013 Marshall, Self-contained Action Type: Equity Teacher Action Type: Special Education Provide instruction for 504 students with Vearlon Jeffries, Micaela Start:  District Staff accommodations outlined in 504 plans. Battles, Loretta 08/20/2012  Performance ACTION BUDGET: $ Ellington, Courtney End: Assessments Gasper, Jane Harkey, 06/30/2013 Action Type: Equity Theresa Ibekwe, Classroom Teachers Utilize Response to Intervention (Rt!) Tier I Vearlon Jeffries, Micaela Start:  District Staff interventions to address the academic deficits Battles, Loretta 08/20/2012  Performance ACTION BUDGET: $ of all students and Tier II and Tier III Ellington, Courtney End: Assessments interventions to address the academic deficits Gasper, Jane Harkey, 06/05/2013  Teachers of \"below basic\" students who are not Theresa Ibekwe-demonstrating growth. Classroom Teachers Action Type: AIP/IRI Action Type: Collaboration Action Type: Equity Analyze disaggregated !TBS test results for first Cheryl Carson, Principal Start:  Performance through fifth grade students to identify the 06/07/2013 Assessments ACTION BUDGET: $ percentage of students scoring at or above the End: 50th percentile on the Reading Comprehension 06/14/2013 subtest and assess the effectiveness of implementing the Differentiation of Instruction intervention. 30    Action Type: Program Evaluation Analyze disaggregated Augmented Benchmark Cheryl Carson, Principal Start:  Performance Exam results for third through fifth grade 06/07/2013 Assessments ACTION BUDGET: $ students to determine the percentage of End: students (by subgroup) scoring \"proficient\" or 06/14/2013 \"advanced\" and assess the implementation of the Differentiation of Instruction intervention. Action Type: Program Evaluation Monitor assessed data for core classes of GT Heather Theodore and Start:  Computers students using SOAR tests, ACTAAP exams, and Rachel Morris, Gifted 08/20/2012  District Staff ACTION BUDGET: $ quarterly grades. Hold parent conferences for and Talented Teachers End:  Performance underachieving students. 06/05/2013 Assessments  Teachers Action Type: Parental Engagement Accumulate quarterly evidence of differentiated Heather Theodore and Start:  Computers learning in core class lesson plans for GT Rachel Morris, Gifted 08/20/2012 ACTION BUDGET: $ students. and Talented Teachers End: 06/05/2013 Action Type: Collaboration Conduct annual evaluation of GT students' Heather Theodore and Start:  Computers progress based on teachers' recommendations Rachel Morris, Gifted 05/20/2013  District Staff ACTION BUDGET: $ and accumulated data. and Talented Teachers, End:  Teachers and Laurie Altschul, GT 06/05/2013 District Coordinator Action Type: Program Evaluation Provide opportunities for enrichment for GT Heather Theodore and Start:  Community students such as virtual field trips, field trips, Rachel Morris, Gifted 08/20/2012 Leaders ACTION BUDGET: $ and competitions. and Talented Teachers End:  Computers 06/05/2013  District Staff Action Type: Equity Provide teachers with materials, equipment, Lou Alley, Instructional Start:  District Staff General technology, and assessments needed in Coach\nTina Brown and 08/15/2012  Teachers Revenue: $520.00 teaching GT students (such as Time for Kids Merilyn Burruss, Math End: magazine). Coaches\nSusan Blue, 06/05/2013 ACTION Literacy Coach BUDGET: $520 31  Action Type: Collaboration Provide activities for advanced students such as Quiz Bowl, Spelling Bee, Destination Imagination, and Mathletes to enrich and extend core curriculum instruction. Action Type: Alignment Action Type: Equity Assist gifted and talented students in tracking their own attendance, SOAR test data, and state-test data by maintaining a notebook or data wall. Action Type: Alignment Action Type: Equity Provide professional development to teachers trained to work with Limited English Proficient students. Action Type: Professional Development Provide professional development to gifted and talented teachers such as AGATE Cconference. Action Type: Professional Development Total Budget:  Heather Theodore and Rachel Morris, Gifted and Talented Teachers Heather Theodore and Rachel, Gifted and Talented Teachers Start: 07/01/2012 End: 06/30/2013 Start: 07/01/2012 End: 06/30/2013 Cheryl Carson, Principal Start: 08/05/2012 End: 06/06/2013 Cheryl Carson, Principal Start: 08/15/2012 End: 06/06/2013 Priority 2: Improve Student Achievement in Mathematics 1. ACSIP CRT Data for BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL Augmented Benchmark Exam - Third Grade Mathematics 2010   District Staff Teachers  Performance Assessments  Teachers  District Staff  ACTION BUDGET: $ ACTION BUDGET: $ ACTION BUDGET: $ General Revenue: $500.00 ACTION BUDGET: $500 $46020 Supporting Data: Combined Population: 101 students were tested and 75% scored proficient or advanced. The analysis of the open response and multiple choice questions in the five mathematics strands revealed that the lowest areas for Combined students were Geometry - multiple choice and Numbers and Operations - open response. The lowest identified areas 32    for the subpopulations were not available. Augmented Benchmark Exam - Third Grade Mathematics 2011 Combined Population: 91 students were tested and 79% scored proficient or advanced. The analysis of the open response and multiple choice questions in the five strands revealed that the lowest identified areas for Combined students were Measurement and Geometry - multiple choice and Geometry and Data Analysis and Probability - open response for Combined students. The lowest identified area for Limited English Proficient students was Data Analysis and Probability. Students with Disabilities had the most difficulty with Geometry and Numbers and Operations. The lowest identified areas for the other subpopulations were not available. Augmented Benchmark Exam - Third Grade Mathematics 2012 Combined Population: 86 students were tested and 72% scored proficient or advanced. The analysis of the open response and multiple choice questions in the five strands of Mathematics revealed that the lowest identified areas for Combined students were Measurement-multiple choice and Data Analysis and Probability and Numbers and Operations-open response. The lowest identified areas for Limited English Proficient students and Students with Disabilities were to identify change over time and finding all possible combinations of two or three sets of objects. The lowest identified areas for the othr subpopulations were not available. 2. Augmented Benchmark Exam - Fourth Grade Mathematics 2010 Combined Population: 95 students were tested and 77% scored proficient or advanced. The analysis of the open response and multiple choice questions in the five mathematics strands revealed that the lowest areas for Combined students were Data Analysis and Probability - multiple choice and geometry - open response. The lowest identified areas for the subpopulations were not available. Augmented Benchmark Exam - Fourth Grade Mathematics 2011 Combined Population: 102 students were tested and 68% scored proficient or advanced. The analysis of the open response and multiple choice questions in the five strands revealed that the lowest identified areas for Combined students were Geometry and Measurement - multiple choice and Geometry - open response for Combined students. The lowest identified are for Limited English Proficient and Students with Disabilities was Geometry - open response. The lowest identified areas for the other subpopulations were not available. Augumented Benchmark Exam - Fourth Grade Mathematics 2012 Combined Population: 90 students were tested and 75% scored proficient or advanced. The analysis of the open 33    response and multiple choice questions in the five strands of Mathematics revealed that the lowest identified areas for Combined students were Measurement - multiple choice and Geometry and Measurement - open response. The lowest identified areas for Limited English Proficient students were using strategies for finding the perimeter of a rectangle and computing elapsed time. The lowest identified areas for Students with Disabilities were solving problems using addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division and computing elapsed time. The lowest identified areas for the other subpopulations were not available. 3. Augmented Benchmark Exam - Fifth Grade Mathematics 2010 Combined Population: 89 students were tested and 72% scored proficient or advanced. The analysis of the open response and multiple choice questions in the five mathematics strands revealed that the lowest areas for Combined students were Geometry - multiple choice and open response. The lowest identified areas for the subpopulations were not available. Augmented Benchmark Exam - Fifth Grade Mathematics 2011 Combined Population: 83 students were tested and 81 % scored proficient or advanced. The analysis of the open response and multiple choice questions in the five strands revealed that the lowest identified areas for Combined students were Algebra - multiple choice and Geometry and Measurement - open response for Combined students. The lowest identified areas for Limited English Proficient and Students with Disabilities were Algebra and Measurement - open response. The lowest identified areas for the other subpopulations were not available. Augmented Benchmark Exam - Fifth Grade 2012 Combined Population: 97 students were tested and 63% scored proficient or advanced. The analysis of the open response and multiple choice questions in the five strands of Mathematics revealed that the lowest identified areas for Combined students were Measurement and Data Analysis and Probability - multiple choice and Geometry - open response. The lowest identified areas for Limited English Proficient students were two-step problem solving and determining the result of a transformation of a two-dimensional figure as a slide, slip, or turn and justifying the answer. The lowest identified areas for Students with Disabilities were interpreting line, double bar, and circle graphs and utilizing models to determine ratios and percents. The lowest identified areas for the other subpopulations were not available. THREE YEAR SUMMARY An examination of the Augmented Benchmark Mathematics Exam results for third, fourth, and fifth grade students in 2009-2010, 2010-2011, and 2011-2012 indicated that Geometry and Measurement Multiple Choice items and Geometry Open Response items were the most difficult for Combined students. The lowest identified areas for Limited English Proficient and Students with Disabilities were: Number and Operations and Measurement. The lowest 34    Action Type: Program Evaluation Analyze disaggregated Augmented Benchmark Cheryl Carson, Principal Start:  Performance Exam results for third through fifth grade 06/07/2013 Assessments ACTION BUDGET: $ students to determine the percentage of End: students (by subgroup) scoring \"proficient\" or 06/14/2013 \"advanced\" and assess the implementation of the Differentiation of Instruction intervention. Action Type: Program Evaluation Monitor assessed data for core classes of GT Heather Theodore and Start:  Computers students using SOAR tests, ACTAAP exams, and Rachel Morris, Gilted 08/20/2012  District Staff ACTION BUDGET: $ quarterly grades. Hold parent conferences for and Talented Teachers End:  Performance underachieving students. 06/05/2013 Assessments  Teachers Action Type: Parental Engagement Accumulate quarterly evidence of differentiated Heather Theodore and Start:  Computers learning in core class lesson plans for GT Rachel Morris, Gifted 08/20/2012 ACTION BUDGET: $ students. and Talented Teachers End: 06/05/2013 Action Type: Collaboration Conduct annual evaluation of GT students' Heather Theodore and Start:  Computers progress based on teachers' recommendations Rachel Morris, Gifted 05/20/2013  District Staff ACTION BUDGET: $ and accumulated data. and Talented Teachers, End:  Teachers and Laurie Altschul, GT 06/05/2013 District Coordinator Action Type: Program Evaluation Provide opportunities for enrichment for GT Heather Theodore and Start:  Community students such as virtual field trips, field trips, Rachel Morris, Gifted 08/20/2012 Leaders ACTION BUDGET: $ and competitions. and Talented Teachers End:  Computers 06/05/2013  District Staff I Action Type: Equity Provide teachers with materials, equipment, Lou Alley, Instructional Start:  District Staff General technology, and assessments needed in Coach\nTina Brown and 08/15/2012  Teachers Revenue: $520.00 teaching GT students (such as Time for Kids Merilyn Burruss, Math End: magazine). Coaches\nSusan Blue, 06/05/2013 ACTION Literacy Coach BUDGET: $520 31  Action Type: Collaboration Provide activities for advanced students such as Quiz Bowl, Spelling Bee, Destination Imagination, :and Mathletes to enrich and extend core curriculum instruction. Action Type: Alignment Action Type: Equity Assist gifted and talented students in tracking their own attendance, SOAR test data, and state-test data by maintaining a notebook or data wall. Action Type: Alignment Action Type: Equity Provide professional development to teachers trained to work with Limited English Proficient students. Action Type: Professional Development  Heather Theodore and Rachel Morris, Gifted and Talented Teachers Heather Theodore and Rachel, Gifted and Talented Teachers Start: 07/01/2012 End: 06/30/2013 Start: 07/01/2012 End: 06/30/2013 Cheryl Carson, Principal Start: 08/05/2012 End: 06/06/2013 Provide professional development to gifted and Cheryl Carson, Principal Start: talented teachers such as AGATE Cconference. 08/15/2012 End: 06/06/2013 Action Type: Professional Development Total Budget: Priority 2: Improve Student Achievement in Mathematics 1. ACSIP CRT Data for BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL Augmented Benchmark Exam - Third Grade Mathematics 2010   District Staff Teachers  Performance Assessments  Teachers  District Staff  ACTION BUDGET: $ ACTION BUDGET: $ ACTION BUDGET: $ General Revenue: $500.00 ACTION BUDGET: $500 $46020 Supporting Data: Combined Population: 101 students were tested and 75% scored proficient or advanced. The analysis of the open response and multiple choice questions in the five mathematics strands revealed that the lowest areas for Combined students were Geometry - multiple choice and Numbers and Operations - open response. The lowest identified areas 32    identified areas for the other subpopulations were not available in 2009-2010, 2010-2011, and 2011-2012. 4. Stanford 10 - Grade 5 Total Mathematics 2010 Combined Population: 89 students were tested and 63% scored at or above the 50th percentile. The lowest area for Combined students was Operations - Communication and Representation. The lowest identified areas for the subpopulations were not available. Iowa Test of Basic Skills - Grade 5 Total Mathematics 2011 Combined Population: 83 students were tested and 49% scored at or above the 50th percentile on the Total Mathematics test. The lowest area for Combined students and Students with Disabilities was multiple step problem solving. The lowest areas for Limited English Proficient students were multiple-step problem solving and estimationorder of magnitude. The lowest identified areas for the other subpopulations were not available. Iowa Test of Basic Skills - Grade 5 Total Mathematics 2012 Combined Population: 97 students were tested and 44% scored at or above the 50th percentile. The lowest identified areas for Combined students were multiple-step problem solving and estimation. The lowest identified areas for Limited English Proficient students were multiple-step problem solving and comparing quantities. The lowest identified areas for Students with Disabilities were multiple step problem solving and estimation. The lowest identified areas for the other subpopulations were not available. 5. Stanford 10 - Grade 4 Total Mathematics 2010 Combined Population: 95 students were tested and 63% scored at or above the 50th percentile. The lowest area for Combined students was Geometry - Communication and Representation. The lowest identified areas for the subpopulations were not available. Iowa Test of Basic Skills - Grade 4 Total Mathemati\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_51","title":"Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2012-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Little Rock (Ark.). Office of Desegregation Monitoring","School integration","Arkansas. Department of Education","Project managers--Implements"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/51"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["project management"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n- Dr. Tom W. Kimbrell Commissioner State Board of Education Dr. Ben Mays Clinton Chair Jim Cooper Melbourne Vice Chair Joe Black Newport Brenda Gullett Fayetteville Sam Ledbetter Little Rock Alice Mahony El Dorado Toyce Newton Crossett Mireya Reith Fayetteville Vicki Saviers Little Rock Four Capitol Mall Little Rock, AR 72201 -1019 (501) 682-4475 - ArkansasEd .org An Equal Opportunity Employer ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION January 31, 2012 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 REt~uVED FF~ - t 2012 F DE : .. m!ITOP.ING Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. M. Samuel Jones III Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 7220 l RE: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. U.S. District Court No. 4:82-CV-866 DPM/HD Y Dear Gentlemen: By way of this letter, I am advising you that I am filing the Arkansas Department of Education's Project Management Tool for the month of January, 2012 in the abovereferenced case. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, ~~-~ Jeremy C. Lasiter General Counsel UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. No. LR-C-82-866 DPM/HDY PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of the ADE's Project Management Tool for January, 2012. ~ :---~ BY: ,-c::::::::r~ JeyC. Lasiter, General Counsel Ark. Bar No. 2001-205 Ark. Department of Education CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Jeremy Lasiter, certify that on January 31, 2012, I caused the foregoing document to be served by depositing a copy in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to each of the following: Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza . 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. M. Samuel Jones, III . Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard 425 West Capitol, Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 72201 ~c:~ JeC. Lasiter ~ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes-the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 Based on-fhe information available af December 31-\n--2011, the ADE calculated th~State FoundationJ:,unding'fqr FY 11112 subject to periodic adjustments. B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 1 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2012 Based ob the'!nformation availa_ble at DecembeL 31 , 26It the ADE calculated for fY 11/12, subjectto perioclic adjustments: C. Process and distribute State MFPA. 1 . Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 On December 31, 2011, distributions of ~tate f:g_undation Funding for FY 11/12 were as follpws\nLRsD-=--$28, 139,675 NLRSb-$15,901 ,671 PCSSD - $.19,553,715 J\"he allotments of State Foundation Funding calculated for FY 11 /12 at December 31, 20t1, subject to periodic adjustments, were as follows: LRSD - $61,907,286 NLRSD - $~4,983,681 PCSSD - $43,018,176 D. Determine the number of Magnet students residing in each District and attending a Magnet School. 1 . Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at December 31 , 2011 for FY11/12, subjec\n:t to periodic adjustments. E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as ordered by the Court. 2 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2012 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at December 31, 2011 for FY11/.12, 'subject to periodic ad]1-1st~ents. It should be noted that currently the Magnet Review Committee is reporting this information instead of the staff attorney as indicated in the Implementation Plan. F. Calculate state aid due the LRSD based upon the Magnet Operational Charge. 1 . Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2012 On October 26, 2010, changes were made in the expense per child to $8,336. Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at December 31, 2011 for FY11/12, subject to periodic adjustm~nts. G. Process and distribute state aid for Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 Distributions for FY 11/12 at December 31, 2011, totaled $8,077,836. Allofmerit calculated for FY 11/12 was $14,373,720 subject.to periodic adjustments'. H. Calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school district is entitled. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2012 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at June 30, 2011 for FY10/11, subject to periodic adjustments. 3 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, September - June. 2. A~tl!!I as of Janu_lry 31\n2012 pistributions for F'{,,1 1/1.2 at !)ec::ember) 1, 2011 , were: LRSD -' $1,783,384 NLRSQ - $2,225,940 :Pesso -$3,9-04\n7q2 The allotments calculatec[for FY 11/12 at Decen,ber 31 , 2011, subject to periodic adju~tments, were: LRSD - -$4,458,463 NLRSD - $5,564,846 PCSSD -$9,761,876 J. Districts submit an estimated Magnet and M-to-M transportation budget to ADE. 1 . Projected Ending Date Ongoing, December of each year. 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 In September 2010, the Magnet and M-to-M transportation budgets for FY 10/11 were submitted to the ADE by the Districts. K. The Coordinator of School Transportation notifies General Finance to pay districts for the Districts' proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 In August 2010, General Finance was notified to pay the third one-third payment for FY 09/10 to the Districts. In August 2010, General Finance was notified to pay the first one-third payment for FY 10/11 to the Districts. In January 2011 , General Finance was notified to pay the second one-third payment for FY 10/11 to the Districts. 4 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) L. ADE pays districts three equal installments of their proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2012 In September 2010, General Finance made the last one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 09/10 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 30, 2009, the following had been paid for FY 09/10: LRSD - $4,054,730.00 NLRSD - $1 ,471 ,255.67 PCSSD - $2,544,356.20 In September 2010, General Finance made the first one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 10/11 transportatron budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 30, 2010, the following had been paid for FY 10/11 : LRSD - $1 ,354,368.33 NLRSD-$510,218.13 PCSSD - $905,109.15 In February 2011 , General Finance made the second one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 10/11 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At February 28, 2011 , the following had been paid for FY 10/11 : LRSD - $2,708,736.66 NLRSD - $1,020,436.26 PCSSD -$1,810,218.30 In December 2011 , General Finance made the last one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 10/11 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At December 31, 2011 , the following had been paid for FY 10/11: LRSD - $3,977,759.00 NLRSD - $1 ,456,077.37 PCSSD - $2,320,249.40 5 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) L. ADE pays districts three equal installments of their proposed budget. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) In December 2011 , General Finance made the first one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 11 /12 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At December 31 , 2011 , the following had been paid for FY 10/11 : LRSD - $1 ,297,333.34 NLRSD - $515,623.32 PCSSD - $889,000.35 M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2012 In August 1997, the ADE transportation coordinator reviewed each district's Magnet and M-to-M transportation costs for FY 96/97. In July 1998, each district was asked to submit an estimated budget for the 98/99 school year. In September 1998, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 98/99 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. School districts should receive payment by October 1, 1998. In September 1999, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 99/00 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2000, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 00/01 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2001 , paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 01/02 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2002, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 02/03 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2003, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 03/04 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2004, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 04/05 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. 6 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) In October 2005, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 05/06 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2006, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 06/07 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2007, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 07/08 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2008, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 08/09 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2009, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 09/10 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2010, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 10/11 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. N. Purchase-buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as stated in Exhibit A of the Implementation Plan. 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 In FY 94/95, the State purchased 52 buses at a cost of $1 ,799,431 which were added to or replaced existing Magnet and M-to-M buses in the Districts. The buses were distributed to the Districts as follows: LRSD - 32\nNLRSD - 6\nand PCSSD - 14. The ADE purchased 64 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $2,334,800 in FY 95/96. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 45\nNLRSD - 7\nand PCSSD - 12. In May 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $646,400. In July 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $624,879. In July 1998, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $695,235. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD - 6. 7 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) Specifications for 16 school buses have been forwarded to state purchasing for bidding in January, 1999 for delivery in July, 1999. In July 1999, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $718,355. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD - 6. In July 2000, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $724,165. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD - 6. The bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was let by State Purchasing on February 22, 2001. The contract was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include two 47 passenger buses for $43.426.00 each and fourteen 65 passenger buses for $44,289.00 each. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passei'i~er\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 2 of the 47 passenger and 4 of the 65 passenger buses. On August 2, 2001, the ADE took possession of 16 new Magnet and_M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $706,898. In June 2002, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include five 47 passenger buses for $42,155.00 each, ten 65 passenger buses for $43,850.00 each, and one 47 passenger bus with a wheelchair lift for $46,952.00. The total amount was $696,227. In August of 2002, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $696,227. In June 2003, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include 5 - 47 passenger buses for $47,052.00 each and 11 - 65 passenger buses for $48,895.00 each. The total amount was $773,105. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 5 of the 47 passenger and 1 of the 65 passenger buses. In June 2004, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The price for the buses was $49,380 each for a total cost of $790,080. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8, NLRSD - 2, and PCSSD - 6. 8 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) In June 2005, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses for the LRSD include 8 - 65 passenger buses for $53,150.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 1 - 47 passenger bus for $52,1 35.00 and 1 - 65 passenger bus for $53,150.00. The buses for the PCSSD include 6 - 65 passenger buses for $53,150.00 each. The total amount was $849,385.00. In March 2006, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Central States Bus Sales. The buses for the LRSD include 8 - 65 passenger buses for $56,810.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 1 - 47 passenger bus for $54,990.00 and 1 - 65 passenger bus for $56,810.00. The buses for the PCSSD include 6 - 65 passenger buses for $56,810.00 each. The total amount was $907,140.00. In March 2007, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Central States Bus Sales. The buses for the LRSD include 4 - 47 passenger buses for $63,465.00 each and 4 - 65 passenger buses for $66,390.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 2 - 47 passenger buses for $63,465.00 each. The bu-ses for the PCSSD include 1 - 65 passenger bus with a lift for $72,440.00 and 5 - 47 passenger buses for $63,465.00 each. The total amount was $1 ,036,115.00. In July 2007, 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses were delivered to the districts in Pulaski County. Finance paid Central States Bus Sales $1 ,036,115. In March 2008, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Central States Bus Sales. The buses for the LRSD include 8 - 65 passenger buses for $66,405.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 1 - 65 passenger bus with a wheelchair lift for $72,850.00 and 1 - 47 passenger bus with a wheelchair lift for $70,620.00. The buses for the PCSSD include 2 - 65 passenger buses for $66,405.00 each, 2 - 47 passenger buses for $65,470.00 each and 2 - 47 passenger buses with wheelchair lifts for $70,620.00 each. The total amount was $1 ,079,700.00. In July 2008, 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses were delivered to the districts in Pulaski County. Finance paid Central States Bus Sales $1 ,079,700. In March 2009, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Central States Bus Sales. The buses for the LRSD include 8 - 65 passenger buses for $65,599.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 2 - 65 passenger buses for $65,599.00 each. The buses for the PCSSD include 6 - 65 passenger buses for $65,599.00 each. The total amount was $1 ,049,584.00. 9 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) In July 2008, 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses were delivered to the districts in Pulaski County. Finance paid Central States Bus Sales $1 ,079,700. In August 2009, 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses were delivered to the districts in Pulaski County. Finance paid Central States Bus Sales $1 ,049,584. Bids were opened on May 7, 2010 for sixteen Magnet and M-to-M buses. The low bid was by Diamond State Bus Sales for a total of $1 ,135,960. There are fourteen 65 passenger buses at $71 ,210 per unit and two 47 passenger units at $69,510 per unit. Little Rock will get 8 - 65 passenger buses. Pulaski County Special will get 4 - 65 passenger buses and 2 - 47 passenger buses. North Little Rock will get 2 - 65 passenger buses. In September 2010, 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses were delivered to the districts in Pulaski County. Finance paid Diamond States Bus Sales $1 ,135,960. Bids were released in July, 2011 for sixteen Magnet and M-to-M buses. The bid was awarded to Diamond State Bus Sales for a total of $1 ,078,790. There were ten 65 passenger buses at $67,398 per unit, four 47 passenger buses at $65,835 per unit and two 47 passenger with lift buses at $70,735 per unit. As of September 30, 2011 all buses have been delivered. Little Rock received 7-65 passenger buses and 1-47 passenger with lift bus. Pulaski County Special received 1-65 passenger bus, 4-47 passenger buses and 1-47 passenger with lift bus. North Little Rock received 2-65 passenger buses. 0 . Process and distribute compensatory education payments to LRSD as required by page 23 of the Settlement Agreement. 1 . Projected Ending Date July 1 and January 1, of each school year through January 1, 1999. 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 Obligation fulfilled in FY 96/97. P. Process and distribute additional payments in lieu of formula to LRSD as required by page 24 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 10 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) P. Process and distribute additional payments in lieu of formula to LRSD as required by page 24 of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2012 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. Q. Process and distribute payments to PCSSD as required by Page 28 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1994. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2012 Final payment was distributed July 1994. R. Upon loan request by LRSD accompanied by a promissory note, the ADE makes loans to LRSD. 1. 2. Projected Ending Date Ongoing through July 1, 1999. See Settlement Agreement page 24. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 The LRSD received $3,000,000 on September 10, 1998. As of this reporting date, the LRSD has received $20,000,000 in loan proceeds. S. Process and distribute payments in lieu of formula to PCSSD required by page 29 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. T. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to NLRSD as required by page 31 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date 2. July 1 of each school year through June 30, 1996. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. 11 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) U. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 00/01. Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 04/05. Distribution in July 2005 for FY 05/06 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 05/06. Distribution in July 2006 for FY 06/07 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 06/07. Distribution in July 2007 for FY 07/08 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 07/08. Distribution in July 2008 for FY 08/09 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 08/09. Distribution in July 2009 for FY 09/10 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 09/10. Distribution in July 2010 for FY 10/11 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 10/11 . 12 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) U. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) Distribution in July 2011 for FY 11/12 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 11/12. V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. 1. Projected Ending Date Not applicable. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2012 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $200,080. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $200,000. This_was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $200,000. This was the total amount d!.!e to_the ODM for FY 00/01. Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 04/05. Distribution in July 2005 for FY 05/06 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 05/06. Distribution in July 2006 for FY 06/07 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 06/07. Distribution in July 2007 for FY 07/08 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to ODM for FY 07/08. Distribution in July 2008 for FY 08/09 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 08/09. 13 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) Distribution in July 2009 for FY 09/10 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 09/10. Distribution in July 2010 for FY 10/11 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 10/11 . Distribution in July 2011 for FY 11/12 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 11 /12. II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. 1. Projected Ending Date January 15, 1995 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 In May 1995, monitors completed the unannounced visits of schools in Pulaski County. The monitoring process involved a qualitative process of document reviews, interviews, and observations. The monitoring focused on progress made since the announced monitoring visits. In June 1995, monitoring data from unannounced visits was included in the July Semiannual Report. Twenty-five per cent of all classrooms were visited, and all of the schools in Pulaski County were monitored. All principals were interviewed to determine any additional progress since the announced visits. The July 1995 Monitoring Report was reviewed by the ADE administrative team, the Arkansas State Board of Education and the Districts. Then it was filed with the Court. The report was formatted in accordance with the Allen Letter. In October 1995, a common terminology was developed by principals from the Districts and the Lead Planning and Desegregation staff to facilitate the monitoring process. The announced monitoring visits began on November 14, 1995 and were completed on January 26, 1996. Copies of the preliminary Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the ADE administrative team and the State Board of Education in January 1996. 14 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2012 (Continued) A report on the current status of the Cycle 5 schools in the ECOE process and their school improvement plans was filed with the Court on February 1, 1996. The unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1996 and ended on May 10, 1996. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and the data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Districts provided data on enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Districts and the ADE Desegregation Monitoring staff developed a definition for instructional programs. The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996 with copies distributed to the parties. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996 and concluded in December 1996. In January 1997, presentations were made to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties to review the draft Semiannual Monitoring Report. The monitoring instrument and process were evaluated for their usefulness in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on achievement disparities. In February 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was filed. Unannounced monitoring visits began on February 3, 1997 and concluded in May 1997. In March 1997, letters were sent to the Districts regarding data requirements for the July 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and the additional discipline data element that was requested by the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Desegregation data collection workshops were conducted in the Districts from March 28, 1997 to April 7, 1997. A meeting was conducted on April 3, 1997 to finalize plans for the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report. Onsite visits were made to Cycle 1 schools who did not submit accurate and timely data on discipline, M-to-M transfers, and policy. The July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were finalized in June 1997. 15 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2012 (Continued) In July 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were filed with the court, and the ADE sponsored a School Improvement Conference. On July 10, 1997, copies of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were made available to the Districts for their review prior to filing it with the Court. In August 1997, procedures and schedules were organized for the monitoring of the Cycle 2 schools in FY 97 /98. A Desegregation Monitoring and School Improvement Workshop for the Districts was held on September 10, 1997 to discuss monitoring expectations, instruments, data collection and school improvement visits. On October 9, 1997, a planning meeting was held with the desegregation monitoring staff to discuss deadlines, responsibilities, and strategic planning issues regarding the Semiannual Monitoring Report. Reminder letters were sent to the Cycle 2 principals outlining the data collection deadlines and availability of technical assistance. In October and November 1997, technical assistance visits were conducted, and announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 2 schools were completed. In December 1997 and January 1998, technical assistance visits were conducted regarding team visits, technical review recommendations, and consensus building. Copies of the infusion document and perceptual surveys were provided to schools in the ECOE process. The February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report was submitted for review and approval to the State Board of Education, the Director, the Administrative Team, the Attorney General's Office, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process, external team visits and finalizing school improvement plans. On February 18, 1998, the representatives of all parties met to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. Additional meetings will be scheduled. 16 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) Unannounced monitoring visits were conducted in March 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process and external team visits. In April 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were conducted, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. In May 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. On May 18, 1998, the Court granted the ADE relief from its obligation to file the July 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report to develop proposed modifications to ADE's monitoring and reperting obligations. In June 1998, monitoring information previously submitted by the districts in the Spring of 1998 was reviewed and prepared for historical files -and presentation to the Arkansas State Board. Also, in June the following occurred: a.) The Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed , b.) the Semiannual Monitoring COE Data Report was completed, c.) progress reports were submitted from previous cycles, and d.) staff development on assessment (SAT-9) and curriculum alignment was conducted with three supervisors. In July, the Lead Planner provided the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee with (1) a review of the court Order relieving ADE of its obligation to file a July Semiannual Monitoring Report, and (2) an update of ADE's progress toward work with the parties and ODM to develop proposed revisions to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. The Committee encouraged ODM, the parties and the ADE to continue to work toward revision of the monitoring and reporting process. In August 1998, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Attorney General, the Assistant Director for Accountability and the Education Lead Planner updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and proposed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. In September 1998, tentative monitoring dates were established and they will be finalized once proposed revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring Plan are finalized and approved. In September/October 1998, progress was being made on the proposed revisions to the monitoring process by committee representatives of all the Parties in the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement. While the revised monitoring plan is finalized and approved, the ADE monitoring staff will continue to provide technical assistance to schools upon request. 17 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) In December 1998, requests were received from schools in PCSSD regarding test score analysis and staff Development. Oak Grove is scheduled for January 21 , 1999 and Lawson Elementary is also tentatively scheduled in January. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD has been rescheduled for April 2000. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD was conducted on May 5, 2000 and May 9, 2000 respectively. Staff development regarding classroom management was provided to the Franklin Elementary School in LRSD on November 8, 2000. Staff development regarding ways to improve academic achievement was presented to College Station Elementary in PCSSD on November 22, 2000. On November 1, 2000, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Director for Accountability updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and discussed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for February 27, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group meeting that was scheduled for February 27 had to be postponed. It will be rescheduled as soon as possible. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting is scheduled for June 27, 2001 . The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from June 27. It will take place on July 26, 2001 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. On July 26, 2001 , the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 11 , 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. 18 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2012 (Continued) On October 11, 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the ADE's intent to take a proactive role in Desegregation Monitoring. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 10, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting that was scheduled for January 10 was postponed. It has been rescheduled for February 14, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On February 12, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead P!-a-nner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 11 , 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On April 11 , 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 11 , 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On July 18, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, talked about section XV in the Project Management Tool (PMT) on Standardized Test Selection to Determine Loan Forgiveness. She said that the goal has been completed, and no additional reporting is required for section XV. Mr. Morris discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. He handed out a Court Order from May 9, 2002, which contained comments from U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr., about hearings on the LRSD request for unitary status. Mr. Morris also handed out a document from the Secretary of Education about the No Child Left Behind Act. There was discussion about how this could have an affect on Desegregation issues. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 10, 2002 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 19 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2012 (Continued) The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from October 10. It will take place on October 29, 2002 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. On October 29, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Meetings with the parties to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan will be postponed by request of the school districts in Pulaski County. Additional meetings could be scheduled after the Desegregation ruling is finalized. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 9, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On January 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. No Child Left Behind and the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD were discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from April 10. It will take place on April 24, 2003 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. On April 24, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Laws passed by the legislature need to be checked to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Ray Lumpkin was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he left, we will discuss the legislation with Clearence Lovell. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 20 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) On August 28, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The LRSD has been instructed to submit evidence showing progress in reducing disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. This is supposed to be done by March of 2004, so that the LRSD can achieve unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 9, 2003 at the ADE. On October 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Gmup met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. \\tefillie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 8, 2004 at the ADE. On October 16, 2003, ADE staff meL with the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee at the State Capitol. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, and Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, presented the Chronology of activity by the ADE in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan for the Desegregation Settlement Agreement. They also discussed the role of the ADE Desegregation Monitoring Section. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, reported on legal issues relating to the Pulaski County Desegregation Case. Ann Marshall shared a history of activities by ODM, and their view of the activity of the school districts in Pulaski County. John Kunkel discussed Desegregation funding by the ADE. On November 4, 2004, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The ADE is required to check laws that the legislature passes to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Clearence Lovell was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he has retired, the ADE attorney will find out who will be checking the next legislation. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 6, 2005 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 21 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) On May 3, 2005, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The PCSSD has petitioned to be released from some desegregation monitoring. There was discussion in the last legislative session that suggested all three districts in Pulaski County should seek unitary status. Legislators also discussed the possibility of having two school districts in Pulaski County instead of three. An Act was passed by the Legislature to conduct a feasibility study of having only a north school district and a south school district in Pulaski County. Removing Jacksonville from the PCSSD is also being studied. The Aext Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 7, 2005 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE.  On June 20, 2006, the ADE lmplementa~ion Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. ADE staff from the Office of Public School Academic Accountability updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The purpose, contentr and due date for information going into the Project Management Tool and its Executive Summary were repor:ted. There was discussion about the three districts in Pulaski County seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 17, 2006 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On March 16, 2007, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review previous Implementation Phase activities. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, reported that U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr. declared the LRSD unitary and released the district from federal court supervIsIon. It was stated that the ADE should continue desegregation reporting until the deadline for an appeal filing has past, or until an appeal has been denied. House Bill 1829 passed the House and Senate. This says the ADE should hire consultants to determine whether and in what respects any of the Pulaski County districts are unitary. It authorizes the ADE and the Attorney General to seek proper federal court review and determination of the current unitary status and allows the State of Arkansas to continue payments under a post-unitary agreement to the three Pulaski County districts for a time period not to exceed seven years. The three Pulaski County districts may be reimbursed for legal fees incurred for seeking unitary or partial unitary status if their motions seeking unitary status or partial unitary status are filed no later than October 30, 2007, and the school districts are declared unitary or at least partially unitary by the federal district court no later than June 14, 2008. Matt McCoy and Scott Richardson from the Attorney General's Office updated the group on legal issues related to desegregation. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 5, 2007 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 22 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) On July 12, 2007, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. He handed out the syllabus of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling from June 28, 2007 about the Seattle School District. The court ruled that the district could no longer use race as the only criteria for making certain elementary school assignments and to rule on transfer requests. Mr. Scott Richardson from the Attorney General's Office said that an expert was going to study the Pulaski County school districts and see what they need to do to become unitary. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 4, 2007 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On October 11 , 2007, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. He handed out news articles about the LRSD being declared unitary and the Joshua interveners filing a notice of appeal to the 8th Circuit Court. The LRSD and the Joshua interveners have asked that the appeal be put on hold while they pursue a mediated settlement. Mr. Scott Richardson from the Attorney General's Office said that the LRSD had until October 31 to respond to the appeal filed by the Joshua interveners. He said that the NLRSD was trying to get total unitary status and the PCSSD was working on getting unitary status in their student assignment. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 10, 2008 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On January 10, 2008, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. He handed out news articles about the districts in Pulaski County seeking unitary status. The Joshua lnterveners filed a motion with the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn the ruling that gave the Little Rock School District unitary status. The Little Rock School District filed its response to the motion by the Joshua lnterveners. After the Pulaski County Special School District sought unitary status, the Joshua lnterveners requested that school desegregation monitors do a study on the quality of facilities in the district, or on the district's compliance with its desegregation plan. Judge Wilson denied the requests by Joshua lnterveners. The North Little Rock School District asked for unitary status and Joshua lnterveners objected and asked for a hearing. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 10, 2008 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 23 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) On April 10, 2008, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. House Bill 1829 that passed in 2007 allowed Pulaski County districts to be reimbursed for legal fees incurred for seeking unitary or partial unitary status if they are declared unitary or at least partially unitary by the federal district court no later than June 14 of 2008. Act 2 was passed in the special legislative session that started March 31 , 2008. This extends the deadline for unitary status to be reimbursed for legal fees from June 14 to December 31 . Also discussed in the Implementation Phase meeting was the push by Jacksonville residents to establish a Jacksonville School District. On April 15, 2008, the PCSSD School Board voted 4-2 against letting Jacksonville leave the district. In 2003, U. S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr., stopped an election in Jacksonville on forming an independent district. He said that taking Jacksonville QUt of the PCSSD would hinder efforts to comply with the court approved desegregation plan. A request by the PCSSD for unitary status is pending in federal district court. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 10, 2008 at 1 :30 p. m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On July 10, 2008, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. He handed out a news article that talked about an evaluation of the North Little Rock School District's compliance with its desegregation plan. The evaluation was done by the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM), a federal desegregation monitoring office. ODM said \"NLRSD has almost no compliance issues that would hinder its bid for unitary status\". Another article said that ODM has proposed a 2008-09 budget that would allow for closing at the end of December 2008 if the school districts in Pulaski County are declared unitary before then . Each of the districts has petitioned U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr. for unitary status. Another article was handed out stating that legislators, attorneys from the Attorney General's Office and representatives of the three school districts in Pulaski County have been conducting meetings to discuss ways to phase out desegregation payments. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 9, 2008 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 24 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) On October 9, 2008, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Meetings have been taking place to prepare for the possibility that the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upholds the ruling that gave the Little Rock School District unitary status. The LRSD has requested that for the next seven years, the three school districts in Pulaski County continue to receive the same amount of desegregation funding that they will receive this year. The LRSD also asked for restrictions on new charter schools in Pulaski County, protection from sanctions if they are in fiscal or academic distress, and a new state-funded education service cooperative in Pulaski County. In a September 17 update on the status of the PCSSD implementation of its desegregation plan, the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM) stated that in some PCSSD schools, black males have suspension rates above 50%. ODM stated that \"districtwide, discipline rates continue to climb\" and black males \"have discipline rates far out of proportion to their presence in the student body.\" Issues listed in the ODM report lead them to \"suggest that PCSSD is not presently in the posture to .either seek or be awarded unitary status by the district court.\" The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 8, 2009 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 25 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) On January 8, 2009, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Recent news articles about the desegregation case were discussed. Mr. Scott Richardson, Arkansas Assistant Attorney General, received a letter in January from the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, stating that the appeal of the unitary status ruling was \"under active consideration\". Mr. Richardson had sent a letter to the clerk of the Court of Appeals in December asking him to inform the judges of legislative, legal and financial matters that hinge on the panel's decision. The panel had heard oral arguments about the appeal in March of 2008. In another news article, the Attorney General's Office rejected proposals to cap the number of new charter schools in Pulaski County, waive penalties for fiscal, academic or facilities distress, and establish a new state-funded education service cooperative in Pulaski County. The Attorney General's Office also rejected the request that for the next seven years, the three school districts in Pulaski County continue to receive the same amount of desegregation funding that they will receive this year. Instead, the office suggested reimbursement based on declining percentage rates, such as 77 percent of desegregation funding the second year, 54 percent the third year, and similar reductions the following years. Other topics of discussion in the meeting included the school choice law and the charter school law. The LRSD has said that charter schools interfere with efforts to comply with desegregation obligations. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 9, 2009 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On April 23, 2009, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The rul ing from the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, stating that the Little Rock School District had achieved unitary status was discussed. U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr. withdrew from the desegregation lawsuit, and was replaced by U.S. District Judge Brian Miller. The first hearing on the Pulaski County school desegregation lawsuit with Judge Miller was scheduled for April 13, 2009. This hearing was cancelled because Judge Miller was involved in a car accident that morning. The hearing was going to be about how far the North Little Rock and Pulaski County Special school districts have progressed toward unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 9, 2009 at 1:30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 26 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) On July 9, 2009, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Recent news articles about the desegregation case were discussed. One article stated that on May 19, Arkansas Attorney General Dustin McDaniel and Arkansas Assistant Attorney General Scott Richardson filed a motion asking U.S. District Judge Brian Miller to schedule court hearings on the requests for unitary status by the North Little Rock and Pulaski County Special school districts. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 8, 2009 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On October 22, 2009, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Recent news articles about the desegregation case were discussed. One article states that Arkansas Attorney General Dustin McDaniel has proposed a seven year phase out of state desegregation payments. Another article talked about the first court hear_ing with U.S. District Judge Brian Miller on the requests for unitary status by the North Little Rock and Pulaski County Special school districts. The hearing was held on September 30. Sam Jones, an attorney for the Pulaski Special School District, Stephen Jones, an attorney for the North Little Rock School District, and Chris Heller, an attorney for the Little Rock School District, want the state desegregation payments to the three districts to continue even if the districts are all unitary. John Walker, an attorney for the Joshua lntervenors, told the judge that an expert should testify on educational achievement in the North Little Rock and Pulaski Special School Districts. He thought the judge was \"influenced\" by the reports he had received from the state. Judge Miller set January 11 as a unitary status hearing date for the North Little Rock School District, and January 25 as a unitary status hearing date for the Pulaski County Special School District. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 7, 2009 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 27 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2012 (Continued) On January 7, 2010, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Recent news articles about the desegregation case were discussed. One article talked about declining enrollments in the Little Rock School District and the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD). The PCSSD lost 275 students this year. Since state funding is based on average enrollment, the reduction in students could cost the PCSSD $1.6 million if the number of students stays the same the rest of the year. Enrollment in public charter schools in Pulaski County is up this year by 718 students. Also discussed was the news that U.S. District Judge Brian Miller postponed the unitary status hearing date for the North Little Rock School District from January 11 to January 25. He postponed the unitary status hearing date for the PCSSD from January 25 to February 22. The Joshua lntervenors had requested delays in the hearings. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 4, 2010 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On April 8, 2010, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Louis Ferren, ADE Internal Auditor for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Jeremy Lasiter, ADE General Council for Legal Services, talked about the desegregation unitary status hearings for the North Little Rock School District and the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD). He also talked about a draft of a federal court motion that could be presented by the Little Rock School District that would accuse the state of violating the desegregation agreement by approving charter schools in Pulaski County. Recent news articles about the desegregation case were discussed. Some articles talked about the PCSSD unitary status hearings discussing the condition of school facilities in the district. Mr. Doug Eaton, Director of Arkansas Public School Academic Facilities and Transportation, talked about school facilities in the PCSSD. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 8, 2010 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On July 8, 2010, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Ms. Melissa Jacks, Interim Program Manager for Licensure provided updated information about NLRSD regarding the possible closure of elementary schools in response to declining enrollment within the district. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Commissioner for Accountability, talked about the need for districts to be sure their buildings are ready to open in August. Mark White, ADE Council for Legal Services, said charter school applications will appear in the next State Board meeting agenda. 28 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) On October 7, 2010, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Jeremy Lasiter, ADE General Council for Legal Services, said U.S. District Judge Brian Miller is considering the information that was presented in the desegregation unitary status hearings for the North Little Rock School District and the Pulaski County Special School District. He also stated that Arkansas Assistant Attorney General Scott Richardson is preparing a case in response to the lawsuit from the Little Rock School District that accuses the state of violating the desegregation agreement by approving charter schools in Pulaski County. On January 13, 2011 , the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark White from ADE Legal Services said that U.S. District Judge Brian Miller is considering the information that was presented in the desegregation unitary status hearings for the North Little Rock School District and the Pulaski County Special School District. He also stated that the Little Rock School District had requested information about individual students that cannot be released because of Federal student privacy regulations. Little Rock School District Superintendent Linda Watson resigned. The Little Rock School Board chose Morris Holmes as the interim superintendent. Facility plans by the Pulaski County Special School District to close several schools caused concerns by parents in the district. The plan included closing Robinson High School and sending students to Maumelle High School. Closing College Station Elementary was also part of the plan. 29 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) On April 7, 2011 , the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. There was discussion about the lawsuit from the Little Rock School District that accuses the state of violating the desegregation agreement by approving charter schools in Pulaski County. The ADE has asked U.S. District Judge Brian Miller to reject the Little Rock School District subpoena of information about students attending charter schools. An attorney for the ADE stated that the requested information could not be released because of Federal student privacy regulations. Judge Miller said that he would delay a decision about the subpoena until after his decision about whether or not the Pulaski County Special and North Little Rock districts sho.uld be given unitary status. A report released by Attorney General Dustin McDaniel stated that some of the desegregation funding provided to the Pulaski County Special and North Little Rock districts was placed in-their general funds instead of being used for desegregation purposes. The financial records for the Little Rock School District are being analyzed. The 88th Arkansas General Assembly passed an act to provide oversight of and accountability for state desegregation funding received and expended by the Pulaski County school districts. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 7, 2011 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On July 7, 2011, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Jeremy Lasiter, ADE General Council for Legal Services, talked about Plan 2000. This is an amended desegregation plan for PCSSD approved in March of 2000. Judge Brian Miller ruled on May 19, 2011 that PCSSD did not successfully meet their plan in the areas of student assignment\nadvanced placement, gifted and talented and honors programs\ndiscipline\nschool facilities\nscholarships\nspecial education\nstaff\nstudent achievement\nand monitoring. Judge Miller ruled that the NLRSD was in substantial compliance with their desegregation plan except for district staffing. The Attorney General's Office has recommended that the ADE provide more assistance to the PCSSD with the areas of Plan 2000 that have not been fully implemented. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 13, 2011 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 30 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) On October 13, 2011 , the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Morris also discussed that a monitoring instrument has been developed for use with PCSSD. The instrument has been through the ADE legal department for approval and is currently at the Attorney Generals' Office under review. Once approved, Mr. Morris will take a team of monitors to PCSSD and will utilize the new monitoring instrument in order to help them better address the 9 areas of compliance that were designated non-unitary. Mr. Jeremy Lasiter, ADE General Council for Legal Services, updated the group on his trip to St. Louis where the 8th Circuit Court heard the appeals for LRSD, NLRSD, and PCSSD. No decision was made on the appeals. Mr. Lasiter said Judge Miller really liked the PMT and stressed that it will be very important for us to continue documenting everything this way. Mr. Morris informed the group that Judge Miller has stepped down and Judge Marshall is now presiding over this case. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 5, 2012 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 31 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) On January 5, 2012, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Morris also discussed that a monitoring instrument has been developed for use with PCSSD. Mr. Morris met with PCSSD and will monitor the district starting the second semester. There were nine (9) areas from the Court for PCSSD that did not meet compliance requirements. Mr. Jeremy Lasiter, ADE General Council for Legal Services, stated that Judge Miller said the desegregation funding should stop. The 8th Circuit Court said that NLR is fully unitary but funds should continue until after the hearings. The state has spent over a billion dollars for desegregation funding in Pulaski County. The ADE must document how the desegregation agreement has lsleen implemented. LRSD filed motion in Court over Charter Schools and achievement gap. The hearing will be held in March. Charter Schools can be part of the hearing where the_ case relates to Charter Schools. They can't contest the funding for desegregation. The ADE will continue to have Implementation Phase Meetings until the desegregation case is totally finished. PCSSD said ASCIP does not address all the items that are in their Plan 2000. PCSSD wants ACSIP changed. ADE is supposed to help PCSSD get in compliance with the nine (9) compliance items. PCSSD wants to help with Professional Development because of their budget constraints. The Legislature changed laws so that there was no longer a limit to the number of Charter Schools. Charter Schools were put in Pulaski County. The LRSD argued that Charter Schools don't provide transportation so the racial makeup of the Charter Schools is racially identifiable and cause more segregation. _people have complained about PCSSD putting new and very expensive buildings in areas where black students are not likely to attend. Standards Assurance Monitoring and Federal and State Monitoring will be done for PCSSD like the other districts. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 5, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. iri room 201-A at the ADE. 32 Ill. A PETITION FOR ELECTION FOR LRSD WILL BE SUPPORTED SHOULD A MILLAGE BE REQUIRED A. Monitor court pleadings to determine if LRSD has petitioned the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing . 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 Ongoing. All Court pleadings are monitored monthly. B. Draft and file appropriate pleadings if LRSD petitions the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 To date, no action has been taken by the LRSD. 33 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION A. Using a collaborative approach, immediately identify those laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date December, 1994 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV. E. of this report. B. Conduct a review within ADE of existing legislation and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. C. Request of the other parties to the Settlement Agreement that they identify laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. D. Submit proposals to the State Board of Education for repeal of those regulations that are confirmed to be impediments to desegregation. 1 . Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of th is report. 34 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 A committee within the ADE was formed in May 1995 to review and collect data on existing legislation and regulations identified by the parties as impediments to desegregation. The committee researched the Districts' concerns to determine if any of the rules, regulations, or legislation cited impedes desegregation. The legislation cited by the Districts regarding loss funding and worker's compensation were not reviewed because they had already been litigated. In September 1995, the committee reviewed the following statutes, acts, and regulations: Act 113 of 1993\nADE Director's Communication 93-205\nAct 145 of 1989\nADE Director's Memo 91-67\nADE Program Standards Eligibility Criteria for Special Education\nArkansas Codes 6-18-206, 6-20-307, 6-20-319, and 6-17-1506. In October 1995, the individual reports prepared by committee members in their areas of expertise and the data used to support their conclusions were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. A report was prepared and submitted to the State Board of Education in July 1996. The report concluded that none of the items reviewed impeded desegregation. As of February 3, 1997, no laws or regulations have been determined to impede desegregation efforts. Any new education laws enacted during the Arkansas 81 st Legislative Session will be reviewed at the close of the legislative session to ensure that they do not impede desegregation. In April 1997, copies of all laws passed during the 1997 Regular Session of the 81 st General Assembly were requested from the office of the ADE Liaison to the Legislature for distribution to the Districts for their input and review of possible impediments to their desegregation efforts. In August 1997, a meeting to review the statutes passed in the prior legislative session was scheduled for September 9, 1997. 35 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) On September 9, 1997, a meeting was held to discuss the review of the statutes passed in the prior legislative session and new ADE regulations. The Districts will be contacted in writing for their input regarding any new laws or regulations that they feel may impede desegregation. Additionally, the Districts will be asked to review their regulations to ensure that they do not impede their desegregation efforts. The committee will convene on December 1, 1997 to review their findings and finalize their report to the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. In October 1997, the Districts were asked to review new regulations and statutes for impediments to their desegregation efforts, and advise the ADE, in writing, if they feel a regulation or statute may impede their desegregation efforts. In October 1997, the Districts were requested to advise the ADE, in writing, no later than November 1, 1997 of any new law that might impede their desegregation efforts. As of November 12, 1997, no written responses were received from the Districts. The ADE concludes that the Districts do not feel that any new law negatively impacts their desegregation efforts. The committee met on December 1, 1997 to discuss their findings regarding statutes and regulations that may impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. The committee concluded that there were no laws or regulations that impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. It was decided that the committee chair would prepare a report of the committee's findings for the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation is now reviewing proposed bills and regulations, as well as laws that are being signed in, for the current 1999 legislative session. They will continue to do so until the session is over. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation will meet on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The committee met on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The purpose of the meeting was to identify rules and regulations that might impede desegregation, and review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. This is a standing committee that is ongoing and a report will be submitted to the State Board of Education once the process is completed. 36 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) The committee met on May 24, 1999 at the ADE. The committee was asked to review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. The committee determined that Mr. Ray Lumpkin would contact the Pulaski County districts to request written response to any rules, regulations or laws that might impede desegregation. The committee would also collect information and data to prepare a report for the State Board. This will be a standing committee. This data gathering will be ongoing until the final report is given to the State Board. On July 26, 1999, the committee met at the ADE. The committee did not report any laws or regulations that they currently thought would impede desegregation, and are still waiting for a response from the three districts in Pulaski County. The committee met on August 30, 1999 at the ADE to review rules and regulations that might impede desegregation. At that time, there were no laws under review that appeared to impede desegregation. In November, tbe three districts sent letters to the ADE stating that they have reviewed the laws passed by the 82nd legislative session as well as current rules \u0026amp; regulations and district policies to ensure that they have no ill effect on desegregation efforts. There was some concern from PCSSD concerning a charter school proposal in the Maumelle area. The work of the committee is on-going each month depending on the information that comes before the committee. Any rules, laws or regulations that would impede desegregation will be discussed and reported to the State Board of Education. On October 4, 2000, the ADE presented staff development for assistant superintendents in LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD regarding school laws of Arkansas. The ADE is in the process of forming a committee to review all Rules and Regulations from the ADE and State Laws that might impede desegregation. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will review all new laws that might impede desegregation once the 83rd General Assembly has completed this session. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will meet for the first time on June 11 , 2001 at 9:00 a.m. in room 204-A at the ADE. The committee will review all new laws that might impede desegregation that were passed during the 2001 Legislative Session. 37 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations rescheduled the meeting that was planned for June 11 , in order to review new regulations proposed to the State Board of Education. The meeting will take place on July 16, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on July 16, 2001 at the ADE. The following Items were discussed: (1) Review of 2001 state laws which appear to impede desegregation. (2) Review of existing ADE regulations which appear to impede desegregation. (3) Report any laws or regulations found to impede desegregation to the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts. The next meeting will take place on August 27, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on August 27, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede dese_gregation. The next meeting will take place on September 10, 2001 in Conference Room 204-B at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on September 10, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on October 24, 2001 in Conference Room 204-B at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on October 24, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. On December 17, 2001, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation composed letters that will be sent to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. Laws to review include those of the 83rd General Assembly, ADE regulations, and regulations of the Districts. 38 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) On January 10, 2002, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to respond by March 8, 2002. On March 5, 2002, a letter was sent from the LRSD which mentioned Act 1748 and Act 1667 passed during the 83rd Legislative Session which may impede desegregation. These laws will be researched to determine if changes need to be made. A letter was sent from the NLRSD on March 19, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation. On April 26, 2002, a letter was sent for the PCSSD to the ADE, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation except the \"deannexation\" legislation which the District opposed before the Senate committee. On October 27, 2003, the ADE sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County asking if there were any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to review laws passed during the 84th Legislative Session, any new ADE rules or regulations, and district policies. In July 2007, the ADE sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County asking if there were any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to review laws passed during the 86th Legislative Session, and any new ADE rules or regulations. The ADE attorney is reviewing laws and regulations to look for any that may impede desegregation. In June 2011 , the ADE sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County asking if there were any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to review laws passed during the 88th Legislative Session, and any new ADE rules or regulations. 39 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES A Through a preamble to the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 The preamble was contained in the Implementation Plan filed with the Court on March 15, 1994. B. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. C. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 Ongoing Through execution of the Implementation Plan , the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement by actions taken by ADE in response to monitoring results. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 Ongoing D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 40 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 At each regular monthly meeting of the State Board of Education, the Board is provided copies of the most recent Project Management Tool (PMT) and an executive summary of the PMT for their review and approval. Only activities that are in addition to the Board's monthly review of the PMT are detailed below. In May 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the total number of schools visited during the monitoring phase and the data collection process. Suggestions were presented to the State Board of Education on how recommendations could be presented in the monitoring reports. In June 1995, an update on the status of the pending Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the State Board of Education. In July 1995, the July Semiannual Monitoring Report was reviewed by the State Board of Education. On August 14, 1995, the State Board-of:Education was informed of the need to increase minority participation in the teacher scholarship program and provided tentative monitoring dates to facilitate reporting requests by the ADE administrative team and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In September 1995, the State Board of Education was advised of a change in the PMT from a table format to a narrative format. The Board was also briefed about a meeting with the Office of Desegregation Monitoring regarding the PMT. In October 1995, the State Board of Education was updated on monitoring timelines. The Board was also informed of a meeting with the parties regarding a review of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and the monitoring process, and the progress of the test validation study. In November 1995, a report was made to the State Board of Education regarding the monitoring schedule and a meeting with the parties concerning the development of a common terminology for monitoring purposes. In December 1995, the State Board of Education was updated regarding announced monitoring visits. In January 1996, copies of the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the State Board of Education. 41 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2012 (Continued) During the months of February 1996 through May 1996, the PMT report was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. In June 1996, the State Board of Education was updated on the status of the bias review study. In July 1996, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the Court, the parties, ODM, the State Board of Education, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In August 1996, the State Board of Education and the ADE administrative team were provided with copies of the test validation study prepared by Dr. Paul Williams. During tb.e months of September 1996 through December 1996, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. On January 13, 1997, a presentation was made to the State Board of Education regarding the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report, and copies of the report and its executive summary were distributed to all Board members. The Project Management Tool and its executive summary were addressed at the February 10, 1997 State Board of Education meeting regarding the ADE's progress in fulfilling their obligations as set forth in the Implementation Plan. In March 1997, the State Board of Education was notified that historical information in the PMT had been summarized at the direction of the Assistant Attorney General in order to reduce the size and increase the clarity of the report. The Board was updated on the Pulaski County Desegregation Case and reviewed the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued by the Court on February 18, 1997 in response to the Districts' motion for summary judgment on the issue of state funding for teacher retirement matching contributions. During the months of April 1997 through June 1997, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. The State Board of Education received copies of the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and executive summary at the July Board meeting. 42 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2012 (Continued) The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on August 4, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. A special report regarding a historical review of the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement and the ADE's role and monitoring obligations were presented to the State Board of Education on September 8, 1997. Additionally, the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Board for their review. In October 1997, a special draft report regarding disparity in achievement was submitted to the State Board Chairman and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In November 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. The Implementation- Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on November 3, 1997 to discuss the progl\"ess made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. In December 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. In January 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and discussed ODM's report on the ADE's monitoring activities and instructed the Director to meet with the parties to discuss revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. In February 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and discussed the February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report. In March 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary and was provided an update regarding proposed revisions to the monitoring process. In April 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In May 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. 43 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2012 (Continued) In June 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also reviewed how the ADE would report progress in the PMT concerning revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In July 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also received an update on Test Validation, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee Meeting, and revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In August 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the five discussion points regarding the proposed revisions to the monitoring and reporting process. The Board also reviewed the basic goal of the Minority Recruitment Committee. In September 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed the proposed modifications to the Monitoring plans by reviewing the common core of written response received from the districts. The primary commonalities were (1) Staff Development, (2) Achievement Disparity and (3) Disciplinary Disparity. A meeting of the parties is scheduled to be conducted on Thursday, September 17, 1998. The Board encouraged the Department to identify a deadline for Standardized Test Validation and Test Selection. In October 1998, the Board received the progress report on Proposed Revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring and Reporting Process (see XVIII). The Board also reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In November, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the proposed revisions in the Desegregation monitoring Process and the update on Test validation and Test Selection provisions of the Settlement Agreement. The Board was also notified that the Implementation Plan Working Committee held its quarterly meeting to review progress and identify quarterly priorities. In December, the State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion by the ADE, the LRSD, NLRSD, and the PCSSD, to relieve the Department of its obligation to file a February Semiannual Monitoring Report. The Board was also notified that the Joshua lnterveners filed a motion opposing the joint motion. The Board was informed that the ADE was waiting on a response from Court. 44 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2012 (Continued) In January, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion of the ADE, LRSD, PCSSD, and NLRSD for an order relieving the ADE of filing a February 1999 Monitoring Report. The motion was granted subject to the following three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua interveners of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement. In February, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was informed that the three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua lnterveners of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement had been satisfied. The Joshua lnterveners were invited again to attend the meeting of the parties and they attended on January 13, and January 28, 1999. They are also scheduled to attend on February 17, 1998. The report of progress, a collaborative effort from all parties. was presented to court on February 1, 1999. The Board was also informed that additional items were received for inclusion in the revised report, after the deadline for the submission of the progress report and the ADE would: (1) check them for feasibility, and fiscal impact if any, and (2) include the items in future drafts of the report. In March, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received and reviewed the Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Progress Report submitted to Court on February 1, 1999. On April 12, and May 10, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On June 14, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. 45 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) On July 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On August 9, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new  Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On September 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On October 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was notified that on September 21 , 1999 that the Office of Education Lead Planning and Desegregation Monitoring meet before the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee and presented them with the draft version of the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan. The State Board was notified that the plan would be submitted for Board review and approval when finalized. On November 8, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. 46 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) On May 8, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April.  On June 12, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 11 , 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 9, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summaiy for the month of October. On December 11 , 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 8, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 12, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 12, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 9, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 14, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 11 , 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. 47 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2012 (Continued) On July 9, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 13, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 10, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 8, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 19, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 10, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 11, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 11, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 13, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 10, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 12, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. 48 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) On September 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 18, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 14, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 12, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 9, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 11, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 8, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. 49 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) On January 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 10, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 14, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 11 , 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On January 10, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of November and December. On February 14, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 14, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 11 , 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. 50 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2012 (Continued) On May 9, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 13, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 11, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 8, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 12, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month-of August. On October 10, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 14, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On January 9, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of November and December. On February 13, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 13, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 10, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 8, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 12, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 10, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. 51 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) On August 14, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 11 , 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 9, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 13, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 11 , 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 17, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 12, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 12, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 9, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 14, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 11 , 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 9, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 13, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 10, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. 52 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2012 (Continued) On October 8, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 5, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 10, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 15, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February_ 11 , 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 10, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 21 , 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 12, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 9, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 14, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 11, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 8, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 13, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 3, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. 53 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2012 (Continued) On December 8, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 12,  2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 9, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 16, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 13, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 11 , 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Ed'ucation reviewed and approved tbe PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 8, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 13, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 10, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 14, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 12, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 9, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 14, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 19, 2010, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_871","title":"\"Board of Education Meeting Agenda,\" North Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2012-01/2012-02"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Education--Arkansas","Education--Finance","Educational planning","School boards","School employees","School improvement programs"],"dcterms_title":["\"Board of Education Meeting Agenda,\" North Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/871"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nBOARD OF EDUCATION MEETING AGENDA 1AM 1 G 2012 TOPJNG lass North Little Rock School District Thursday, January 19, 2012 5:30 P.M. NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - BOARD OF EDUCATION Administration Building, 2700 Poplar Street North Little Rock, Arkansas 72115 Thursday, January 19, 2012 - 5:30 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENTS I. CALL TO ORDER, Dorothy Williams, President II. INVOCATION, Kennedy Banks, Glenview Elementary Fourth Grader, Daughter of Alexandria Rodgers III. FLAG SALUTE IV. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Dorothy Williams, President Scott Teague, Vice President J.T. Zakrzewski, Secretary Darrell Montgomery, Disbursing Officer John Riley, Parliamentarian Scott A. Miller, Member Ron Treat, Member V. RECOGNITIO OF PEOPLE/EVENTS/PROGRAMS A. Superintendent's Honor Roll - S. Brazear 1. Juanita Mattox, Seventh Street Elementary Custodian 2. Marie Pierce, NLRHS East Campus B. Special Recognition - S. Brazear 1. 20 Most Improved Elementary Schools in Arkansas, Benchmark Literacy Achievement from 2010 to 2011 *Lynch Drive Elementary *Belwood Elementary North Heights Elementary (*Most Improved, Top 5 in Central Arkansas) Page 2 - Board Agenda January 19, 2012 VI. DISPOSITION OF MINUTES OF PRIOR MEETINGS A. Thursday, December 15, 2011 - 5:30 P.M. (Regular) -Page A- 1 VII. ACTION ITEMS - NEW BUSINESS A. Consider Audit of 2010 - 2011 School Year - D. Drennan B. Consider Fiscal Distress Improvement Reports - D. Drennan 1. Detailed Statement of Changes in Fund Balances - Page K - 1 2. Summary Revenue Status Report - Page L - 1 3. Summary Expenditure Status Report - Page M - 1 4. Bank Reconciliation Report - Page N - 1 C. Consider Motion for Consent Agenda - K. Kirspel 1. Consider monthly financial report - Page O - 1 2. Consider employment of personnel - Page P - 1 3. Consider bid items - Page S - 1 4. Consider payment of regular bills - Page T - 1 VIII. CALENDAR OF EVENTS  IX. A. School Millage Election - Tuesday, February 14, 2012  Early Voting-Monday, February 7-10, 2012 at Laman Library, NLR  Early Voting-Monday, February 7 - 10 and February 13, 2012 at Pulaski County Court House, 401 W. Markham, Little Rock B. Next Board (Regular) Meeting - Thursday, February 16, 2012 - 5:30 p.m. Administration Office Board Room INFORMATIONAL ITEM A. Draft of 2012-2013 School Year Calendar-G. Thompson X. STUDENT EXPULSIONS XI. ADJOURNMENT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of the Superintendent REGULAR MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION MINUTES December 15, 2011 The North Little Rock School District Board met in regular session on Thursday, December 15, 2011, in the Board Room of the Administration Building of the North Little Rock School District, 2700 Poplar Street, North Little Rock, Arkansas. President Dorothy Williams called the meeting to order at 5 :30 p.m. Taylor Puckett, NLRHS West Campus Senior, gave the invocation and led the flag salute. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Present Dorothy Williams, President Scott Teague, Vice President J. T. Zakrzewski, Secretary Darrell Montgomery, Disbursing Officer John Riley, Parliamentarian Scott A. Miller, Member Ron Treat, Member Absent None Others Present Mr. Ken Kirspel, Superintendent\nBobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent\nDenise Drennan, Chief Financial Officer\nRosie Coleman, Administrative Director for Elementary Education\nRhonda Dickey, Administrative Director for Secondary Education\nGreg Daniels, Administrative Director of Information Services\nSusan Shurley, Administrative Director for Special Services\nGregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Human Resources\nadditional staff members and Darlene Holmes, Superintendent's secretary, were also present. Billy Duvall (audio) and Hannah Smith with NLRHS CATS-TV (video) recorded the meeting. RECOGNITION OF PEOPLE/EVENTS/PROGRAMS Shara Brazear, Communications Specialist, presented our North Little Rock School District's teachers that recently earned their National Board Certification: Amanda Chaudoin, Jennifer Conner, Lindsey Fleisher, Cindy Quarry, Natalie Rhodes, Missy Sela, and Nancy Simpson. All were presented plaques and gift bags. Jennifer Kimbrell was recognized for being named as a regional finalist in the Arkansas Teacher of the Year. Sara Logan, Lakewood Elementary Principal, was recognized with her staff for their being highlighted by the national Center for Education Achievement as 2011 High Performing School. A-1 DISPOSITION OF MINUTES OF PRIOR MEETING MOTION Darrell Montgomery moved to accept the Thursday, November 17, 2011 (Regular) meeting minutes as printed in the agenda. Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Miller, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Treat, Williams and Zakrzewski None NEW BUSINESS AMENDED AGENDA MOTION Scott Miller moved to add proposed revisions to the Professional Services Agreement with DLR Group as an additional new business item. Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Miller, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Treat, Williams and Zakrzewski None Certified Personnel Policies Committee Report Mrs. Majoice Thomas, Certified Personnel Policies Committee Chair, presented their minutes with one proposal to revise policy CAI Announcement of Vacancies to utilize electronic notification of vacancies instead of posting in each building. The recommendation was to revise CAI from: \"In consideration of the interests and aspirations of its teachers, the administration will give primary consideration to existing staff when filling vacancies. All qualified employees who request consideration for an existing vacancy will be interviewed. All such requests will be acknowledged by the personnel office. The employee selected to fill a vacancy will be transferred to that position depending on the availability of a replacement, consideration being given to a smooth transition, and as little interruption as possible to the students involved. Procedure outlined in Policy CBD will be followed. The following criteria shall be used in considering applications for vacancies. These criteria are not rank-ordered or exhaustive. Those who are interviewed for transfer to a vacant position who are not granted the transfer will be notified with the reasons for the decision.  Academic preparation or technical training  Certifications, endorsements, or licenses  Date of transfer request  Demographic need of the District (balance according to race and experier..'::)e.  Evaluations  Professional objectives of the employee  Recommendations and references  Seniority  Work experiences  Criminal background check  Highly qualified status  Compliance with state and federal guidelines Applicant(s) will be notified of the reason(s) for not being selected. A-2 During the school year, announcements of vacancies or job openings in the areas of supervision, administration, and teaching shall be posted in the Central Administrative Office Building, in each school building in the District, and placed on the District's website. As vacancies occur during the summer, prior to August l, information shall be posted on a bulletin board located in the Central Administrative Office Building and placed on the District's website. Prior to filling vacancies, the District Personnel Officer will notify those employees who have filed transfer requests for said vacancies.\" To: \"In consideration of the interests and aspirations of its teachers, the administration will give primary consideration to existing staff when filling vacancies. All qualified employees who request consideration for an existing vacancy will be interviewed. All such requests will be acknowledged by the personnel office. The employee selected to fill a vacancy will be transferred to that position depending on the availability of a replacement, consideration being given to a smooth transition, and as little interruption as possible to the students involved. Procedure outlined in Policy CBD will be followed. The following criteria shall be used in considering applications for vacancies. These criteria are not rank-ordered or exhaustive. Those who are interviewed for transfer to a vacant position who are not granted the transfer will be notified with the reasons for the decision.  Academic preparation or technical training  Certifications, endorsements, or licenses  Date of transfer request  Demographic need of the District (balance according to race and experience).  Evaluations  Professional objectives of the employee  Recommendations and references  Seniority  Work experiences  Criminal background check  Highly qualified status  Compliance with state and federal guidelines As vacancies occur during the summer, prior to August l, information shall be posted on a bulletin board located in the Central Administrative Office Building and placed on the District's website with email messages sent to employees notifying them of the vacancies. Prior to filling vacancies, the District Personnel Officer will notify those employees who have filed transfer requests for said vacancies. During the school year, announcements of vacancies or job openings in the areas of supervision, administration, and teaching shaii be posted in the Central Administrative Office Building, in each school building in the District, and placed on the District's website with email messages sent to employees notifying them of vacancies. Applicant(s) will be notified of the reason(s) for not being selected. As vacancies are filled, the certification status of the employee will be shown on the recommendation to the Board of Education.\" MOTION Darrell Montgomery moved to accept the proposal as presented. Scott Teague seconded the motion. A-3 YEAS: NAYS: Miller, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Treat, Williams and Zakrzewski None Career Action Plan (CAP) Booklets Rhonda Dickey, Administrative Director of Secondary Education, presented revisions to the CAP booklets for the 2012 - 2013 school year. MOTION Scott Teague moved to accept the Career Action Plan booklets as presented. Scott Miller seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Miller, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Treat, Williams and Zakrzewski None Resolution of Temporary School Assignments MOTION Scott Miller moved to accept the following resolution with J. T Zakrzewski seconding the motion: \"WHEREAS .... Successful passage of the millage vote on February 14, 2012 will require temporary school reassignments to accommodate school construction at various buildings, WHEREAS ... The North Little School District will make the necessary efforts to keep these temporary assignments at a minimum, WHEREAS ... .Ifthe millage vote fails on February 14, 2012, the current school assignments will not be altered due to millage related construction, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE NORTH SCHOOL BOARD .... The North Little Rock School District is committed to maintaining the quality and level of courses available to students during the millage construction regardless of the school assignment and working with the students and staff to provide improvements as necessary to help insure the quality of the education at those temporary facilities.\" AMENDED MOTION John Riley moved to amend the resolution to remove the third paragraph: \"WHEREAS .... If the millage vote fails on February 14, 2012, the current school assignments will not be altered due to millage related construction,\" Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Miller, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Treat, Williams and Zakrzewski None VOTE ON ORIGINAL MOTION AS AMENDED 'YEAS: Miller, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Treat, Williams and Zakrzewski NAYS: None AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH DLR GROUP Mr. Kirspel explained this amendment was necessary for the planning prior to the millage on February 14, 2012. A-4 MOTION Scott Miller moved to accept the revised DLR Group Professional Services Agreement as presented. Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Miller, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Treat, Williams and Zakrzewski None Fiscal Distress Improvement Reports Mrs. Drennan explained that one of the Arkansas Department of Education requirements concerning fiscal distress was to publish the monthly documents of the detailed statement of changes in Fund Balances, Summary Revenue Status Report, Summary Expenditure Status Report and the Bank Reconciliation Report. Board members did not have any questions concerning these reports. MOTION Scott Miller moved to accept the Fiscal Distress Improvement Reports as presented and published in the agenda. Scott Teague seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Miller, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Treat, Williams and Zakrzewski None Consent Agenda Mr. Kirspel recommended the Board accept the financial, personnel, bid items, and regular bills on pages 0-1 through T-23. MOTION Scott Teague moved to accept the consent agenda as presented. J. T. Zakrzewski seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Miller, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Treat, Williams and Zakrzewski None STUDENT EXPULSIONS Mr. Acklin presented expulsion recommendation for Leon Sherman, NLRHS West Campus, for the remainder of the school year for violation of Board Policy 4.24 Drugs and Alcohol. Neither the student nor his parents were present. MOTION Scott Teague moved to accept Administration's recommendation to expel Leon Sherman for the remainder of the school year for violation of Policy 4.24 Drugs and Alcohol. Scott Miller seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Miller, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Treat, Williams and Zakrzewski None Mr. Acklin presented expulsion recommendation for Ryan Thomas, NLRHS West Campus, for the remainder of the school year for violation of Board Policy 4.24 Drugs and Alcohol. Neither the student nor his parents were present. A-5 MOTION John Riley moved to accept Administration's recommendation to expel Aaron Little for the remainder of the school year for violation of Policy 4.24 Drugs and Alcohol. J. T. Zakrzewski seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Miller, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Treat, Williams and Zakrzewski None ADJOURNMENT MOTION John Riley moved to adjourn the meeting. J.T. Zakrzewski seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Miller, Montgomery, Riley, Teague, Treat, Williams and Zakrzewski None President Williams declared the meeting adjourned at 6:25 p.m. Dorothy Williams, President Darlene Holmes, Recording Secretary A-6 ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL COMPUTER NETWORK DATE: 01/06/2012 PAGE NUMBER: 1 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT TIME: 08:06:11 MODULE NUM: STATM9AR DETAILED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FOR PERIODS 1 THROUGH 6 OF 12 SELECTION CRITERIA: ALL FUND/SF FUND TITLE BEG BALANCE REVENUE NON-REVENUE NON-EXPEND EXPENDITURES END BALANCE 0001 DISBURSEMENT FUND .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .oo TOTAL NO FUND GROUP TITLE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1000 TEACHER SALARY FUND .oo .. 00 12,973,088.66 .00 12,973,088.66 .00 1001 UNREST OPER .00 .00 38,670.00 .00 38,670.00 .00 1045 SUMMER SCHOOL .00 .00 700.00 .00 700.00 .00 1053 GT SUM QUEST .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1090 YALE 21ST CENT .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1223 PROF DEV .00 .00 2,880.00 .00 2,880.00 .00 1227 CPEP .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1229 NBPTS START-UP GRANT .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1232 HIGH GAINS RATING .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1240 ESY SE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1244 ESY .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1246 PRO QLTY INDUCTION PGM .00 .00 30,000.00 .00 30,000.00 .00 1260 EARLY CHILDHOOD SPEC ED .00 .00 591,919.35 .00 591,919.35 .00 1275 ALT LEARNING .oo .00 228,181.98 .00 228,181.98 .00 1276 ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS .00 .00 24,075.54 .00 24,075.54 .00 1281 NSLA .00 .00 651,196.85 .00 651,196.85 .00 ~ 1290 CWIP GRANT .00 .00 580.00 .00 580.00 .00 1365 ABC-AR BETTER CHANCE ,00 .oo 514,417.79 .00 514,417.79 .00 I 1381 SMART START LITERACY .00 .00 37,759.37 .00 37,759.37 .00 - T13O8T7A L TEACMHE-TRO S-MA LAINRCYE NFUTINVDE ..0000 ..0o0o 161,,106752,,724744..1517 .00 1,072,274.57 .00 .00 16,165,744.11 .00 2000 OPERATING FUND .00 .00 6,392,895.32 12,973,088.66 14,408,383.76 -20,988,577.10 2001 UNREST 0TH GEN OP FUND 8,332,864.05 30,081,857.00 52,800.84 6,445,065.32 838,787.90 31,183,668.67 2002 PK UAMS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2003 PK EXT DAY 55,066.47 16,430.68 .00 .00 21,310.78 50,186.37 2004 TARGET-REDWOOD 309.57 .00 .00 .00 .00 309.57 2005 CW EXT DAY 12,319.01 42,201.84 .00 .00 28,004.55 26,51\u0026lt;5.30 2006 DHS-BRADBOLDING 3.63 .00 .00 .00 .00 3.63 2015 JAG-ARGENTA .00 .00 .00 .oo .00 .00 2045 SUMMER SCHOOL .00 4,045.00 .00 700.00 10.880.39 --7, 535. 39 2046 READ REC GRANT .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2050 CAMP ROB WRK PGM 28,434.56 21,683.00 .00 .00 15,361.84 34,755, 72 2053 GT SUM QUEST .00 .00 .00 .00 61. 25 -61.25 2072 AR HERITAGE GRANT PV 1,210.00 .00 .oo .00 .00 1,210.00 2074 AR COMM FOUN 535.05 .00 .00 .00 .oo 535.05 2075 ARK ARTS COUNCIL 1,540.00 1,473.00 .00 .00 ,00 3,013.00 2084 WALMART GRANT .oo .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2090 YALE 21ST CENT .oo .00 .00 .OD .00 .00 2105 CW EXT DAY .00 .00 .oo .oo .00 , 00 2217 STU GROWTH 580,825.57 .00 .00 .oo 490,55'5.61 90,269.96 2218 DECLINING ENROLLMENT .oo .00 .oo .oo .00 . 00 2223 PROF DEV 59,799.34 362,980.00 .00 2,880.00 218,942.80 200,956.54 2225 EAST .00 .00 .00 .oo .oo ,00 2227 CPEP-COLLEGE PREP ENR PGM 10,939.92 .00 .oo .oo .00 10,939.92 2229 NBPTS START UP GRANT 1,650.76 .00 .oo .oo .00 1,650.76 2232 HIGH GAINS RATING 2,365.13 .oo .oo .00 .00 2,365.13 ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL COMPUTER NETWORK PAGE NUMBER: 2 DATE: 01/06/2012 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT MODULE NUM: STATM9AR TIME: 08:06:11 DETAILED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FOR PERIODS 1 THROUGH 6 OF 12 SELECTION CRITERIA: ALL FUND/SF FUND TITLE BEG BALANCE REVENUE NON-REVENUE NON-EXPEND EXPENDITURES END BALANCE 2240 CHILD W/0IS 197,094.90 .00 .00 .00 .00 197,094.90 2244 SE-ESY 2,219.63 15,170.00 .00 .00 3,445.12 13,944.51 2246 PRO QLTY IND PGM 10,270.46 58,600.00 .00 30,000.00 15,284.33 23,586.13 2250 RESID TREAT W/0 DISAB .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2255 RESID TREAT W/DISAB 5,760.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 5,760.00 2260 EC SE 568,390.95 687,050.00 .00 591,919.35 238,694.52 424,827.08 2265 SE CATASTROPHIC 746,883.82 .00 .00 .00 26,818.77 720,065.05 2270 GT ACT.56 PGM AWARD 3,000.00 .00 .00 .00 499.78 2,500.22 2271 GT ADVANCE PLACEMENT 3,373.83 7,300.00 .00 .00 857.90 9,815.93 2275 ALE 117,360.31 560,569.00 .00 228,181.98 64,643.04 385,104.29 2276 ELL 251,754.80 113,022.00 .00 24,075.54 17,550.88 323,150.38 2281 NSLA 448,777.66 1,745,412.00 .00 651,196.85 533,615.01 1,009,377.80 2290 CWIP GRANT 12,029.86 .00 .00 580.00 7,197.51 4,252.35 2300 COORD COMP WORK 6,850.94 .00 .00 .00 7,156.31 -305.37 2365 ABC-AR BETTER CHANCE 48,240.00 1,321,434.00 .00 514,417.79 530,102.34 325,153.87 2380 OHS INFANT/TODDLER PGM 2,747.21 .00 .00 .00 365.29 2,381.92 2381 SMART START LITERACY 10,900.90 88,717.00 .00 37,759.37 9,764.14 52,094.39 2383 SM STRT-LIT STF DEV 7,860.40 .00 .00 .00 .00 7,860.40\n,::: 2387 M-TO-M REVENUE INCENTIVE 261,267.33 3,421,694.56 .00 1,072,274.57 876,914.02 1,733,773.30 I 2388 MAGNET/M-TO-M TRANSPORT .00 951,264.43 .00 .00 251,499.06 699,765.37 2392 GEN FACILITIES FUNDING N .00 32,612.00 .00 .00 24,446.74 8,165.26 2394 DEBT SERVICE SUPPLEMENT .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2395 OHS HUMANS VC WRK INIT 3,657.60 25,772.70 .00 .00 23,252.37 6,177.93 2399 0TH GRANTS/AID STATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2903 PATHWISE MENTOR TRG GRANT .00 7,145.00 .00 .00 .00 7,145.00 2995 SOFT DRINK ACCOUNT .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TOTAL OPERATING FUND 11,796,303.66 39,566,433.21 6,445,696.16 22,572,139.43 18,664,396.01 16,571,897.59 3000 BUILDING FUND 229,178.02 2,018.18 13,500.00 .00 13,500.00 231,196.20 3300 BONDS REFUND .00 .00 27,535.81 .00 .00 27,535.81 3403 ACAD FAC TRANSITIONAL PGM .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 3404 ACAD FAC PARTNERSHIP 1,571,537.22 30,228.78 .00. .00 .00 1,601,766.00 TOTAL BUILDING FUND 1,800,715.24 32,246.96 41,035.81 .00 13,500.00 1,860,498.01 4000 DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,761,153.16 3,647,351.13 .00 104,206.17 259,398.41 5,044,899.71 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,761,153.16 3,647,351.13 .00 104,206.17 259,398.41 5,044,899.71 5000 CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND 859,033.39 1,118,020.32 .00 .00 1,288,917.61 688,136.10 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND 859,033.39 1,118,020.32 .00 .00 1,288,917.61 688,136.10 6406 IMPR LIT THRU LIBRARIES .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 6430 ROTC 2,582.04 58,423.04 .00 .00 84,549.05 -23,543.97 6441 TITLE IV-B 21ST CENT 36,653.58 35,000.00 .00 .00 36,200.20 35,453.38 6466 EMERG IMPACT AID PGM HURR 2,316.49 .00 .00 .00 .  . 00 2,316.49 6501 CHAPTER I 13,531.35 618,787.25 .00 .00 1,240,908.58 -608,589.98 6505 TITL I SCH IMPV GRT 1003A .00 .00 .00 .00 33,311.34 -33, 311. 34 6511 ESEA STABILIZATION ARRA .00 -1,354.00 .00 .00 .00 -1,354.00 6516 TITLE\nI A-ARRA .00 1,210,666.38 .00 .00 1,210,666.38 .00 6517 TITLE I SCH IMPR-ARRA .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 6519 ED JOBS FUND ARRA .83 337,282.00 .00 .00 81,045.94 256,236.89 ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL COMPUTER NETWORK PAGE NUMBER: 3 DATE: 01/06/2012 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT MODULE NUM: STATM9AR TIME: 08:06:11 DETAILED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FOR PERIODS 1 THROUGH 6 OF 12 SELECTION CRITERIA: ALL FUND/SF FUND TITLE BEG BALANCE REVENUE NON-REVENUE NON-EXPEND EXPENDITURES 6520 END BALANCE TITLE V-A INNOV PGMS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 6523 TITLE I READING FIRST 1.13 .00 .00 .oo .00 1.13 6530 HOMELESS 67,821.04 40,000.00 .00 .00 31,875.98 75,945.06 6535 TITLE V-B PUB CHARTER SCH .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 6565 TCHR QLTY ENH GRANT 566,707.86 .oo .00 .00 .00 566,707.86 6570 PERKINS BASIC GRANT .00 -6,816.36 .00 .00 14,260.08 -21,076.44 6571 CARL PERK-IT FUNDAMENTALS 36,820.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 36,820.90 6578 PERKINS - SUPPL GRANT .00 .00 .00 .00 14,202.28 -14,202.28 6579 CARL PERK STAB-ARRA .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 6595 TITLE IID ED TECH .00 .00 .00 .oo .00 .00 6702 VIB .oo 700,853.77 .00 .00 637,552.55 63,301.22 6703 TITLE VI-B HEAD START .00 .00 .00 .00 .oo .oo 6710 IDEA EARLY CH SECT 619 600,835.77 116,827.00 .00 .00 290,479.68 427,183.09 6721 IDEA-ARRA .00 303,531.26 .00 .00 303,531.26 .oo 6722 IDEA CEIS-ARRA .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ~ 6723 IDEA PK-ARRA .00 57,562.51 .00 .oo 57,562.51 .00 6724 IDEA STABILIZATION-ARRA .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 I 6750 MEDI CATASTR COV ACT 848,142.49 22, 661. 61 .00 .oo 83,576.50 787,227.60 w 6751 SCH-BASEMENT HLTH MEDI .00 .00 .00 .00 .oo .oo 6752 ARMAC .00 80,965.56 .00 .00 357,333.19 -276,367.63 6754 JAVITS GT GRANT 33.79 .00 .00 .oo .00 33.79 6756 TITLE IIA-TCH QUAL 12,108.35 145,028.85 .00 .oo 200,217.22 -43,080.02 6761 TITLE III ELL- 39,371.17 .00 .00 .00 13,312.71 26,058.46 6781 SAFE \u0026amp; DRUG FREE SCHOOLS .00 .00 .00 .00 .oo .00 6785 SCH HLTH 1,509.73 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,509.73 6790 0TH FED GRNTS THRUST 14,055.00 .00 .00 .oo .00 14,055.00 6796 WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT 13,026.29 .00 .00 .oo .00 13,026.29 6802 MODERNIZATION STAB-ARRA .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 6803 RENOVATION STAB-ARRA .00 .00 .00 .oo .oo .00 6804 REPAIR STAB-ARRA .00 .00 .00 .00 .oo .oo 6805 ED FOR HOMELESS-ARRA .00 2,508.56 .00 .oo 2,508.56 .00 6810 SCH IMPR-ARRA .00 105,511.83 .00 .00 111,886.94 -6, 375 .11 TOTAL FEDERAL FUND 2,255,516.91 3,827,439.26 .00 .00 4,804,9~0.95 1,277,975.22 7000 ACTIVITY FUND .00 .00 .oo .00 .oo .oo 7001 000 GENERAL 2,916.51 239_. 76 .oo .oo 668.00 2,488.27 7002 000 CBI 247. 77 .00 .00 .oo .00 247.77 7003 000 SUNSHINE 1. 232. 82 .00 .00 .00 591. 99 640.83 7004 000 BUSINESS 89.00 .00 .00 .oo .00 89.00 7005 000 VIPS 135. 00 .00 .00 .00 .00 135. 00 7006 000 DARE 1,245.00 .00 .00 .oo .00 1,245.00 7007 000 PARTNERS 3,486.73 .oo .00 .00 .00 3,486.73 7008 000 UNIFORM WELFARE .00 .oo .oo .00 .oo .oo 7009 000 HEART \u0026amp; SOLE 170.96 .00 .00 .oo ' .00 170. 96 7010 000 COLLEGE FAIR .00 .oo .00 .00 .oo .00 7011 000 FLU SHOTS .00 .00 .00 .oo .00 .00 7012 000 CEL OF TEACHING 343. 72 .00 .00 .oo .00 343.72 7013 000 RILEY UNIFORMS 246.64 .00 .00 .oo .00 246.64 7014 000 P BUNCH MEMORIAL 2,500.74 .00 .00 .00 .oo 2,500.74 7015 000 UNITED WAY WELFARE 427.63 2,737.73 .00 .oo 2,689.33 476.03 ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL COMPUTER NETWORK PAGE NUMBER: 4 DATE: 01/06/2012 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT MODULE NUM: STATM9AR TIME: 08:06:11 DETAILED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FOR PERIODS 1 THROUGH 6 OF 12 SELECTION CRITERIA: ALL FUND/SF FUND TITLE BEG BALANCE REVENUE NON-REVENUE NON-EXPEND EXPENDITURES END BALANCE 7016 000 J ROGERS SCHOLARSHIP -7,500.00 20,000.00 .00 .00 5,000.00 7,500.00 7017 000 SPERRY SCHOLARSHIP .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7018 000 A BEAVERS SCHOLARSHIP .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7019 000 J HATCHER SCHOLARSHIP 3,000.00 .,00 .00 .00 1,000.00 2,000.00 7020 000 BLANSETT SCHOLARSHIP .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7021 000 COKE/SERV SCHOLARSHIP 29,095.00 .00 .00 .00 6,250.00 22,845.00 7022 000 CEL TEACH SCHOLARSHIP .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7023 000 S URTON SCHOLARSHIP 3,711.00 .00 .00 .00 1,350.00 2,361.00, 7024 000 LOUNGE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7025 000 INSALACO SCHOLARSHIP 1,500.00 .00 .00 .00 750.00 750.00 7100 076 GENERAL 11,414.04 3,932.58 .00 .00 5,616.72 9,729.90 7101 076 LIBRARY 610.47 131.85 .00 .00 100.80 641. 52 7102 076 STUDENT COUNCIL 8,071.01 654.50 .00 .00 1,407.21 7,318.30 7103 076 HONOR SOCIETY 3,385.19 315.25 .00 .00 296.64 3,403.80 7104 076 MUSIC 1,582.73 4,810.12 .00 .00 1,427.04 4,965.81 7105 076 JOURNALISM 36,684.56 31,506.50 .00 .00 39,664.36 28,526.70 7106 076 FRIEND OF THE THEATRE 4,107.52 100.00 .00 .00 .00 4,207.52 ~ 7107 076 EAST LAB 285.90 .00 .00 .00 .00 285.90 I 7108 076 FBLA 162.74 .00 .00 .00 .00 162.74 .\n::,. 7109 076 SCIENCE 24.50 .00 .00 .00 .00 24.50 7110 076 FHA 174.06 .00 .00 .00 .00 174.06 7111 076 DRAMA 6,600.33 2,008.00 .00 .00 4,596.37 4,011.96 7112 076 SENIOR CABINET 147.20 .00 .00 .00 .00 147.20 7113 076 TCHRS OF TOMORROW 10.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 10.00 7114 076 MU ALPHA THETA 4,710.31 .00 .00 .00 351. 08 4,359.23 7115 076 VICA .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7116 076 KEY CLUB 300.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 300.00 7117 076 SPANISH .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7118 076 TV 733.41 .00 .00 .00 365.45 367.96 7119 076 PROJECTS 654.45 1,400.00 .00 .00 1,270.00 784.45 7120 076 NEWSPAPER 260.47 .00 .00 .00 .00 260.47 7121 076 TCCA .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7122 076 STUDENT ACTIVITIES 1,024.09 82.64 .00 .00 63.80 1,042.93 7123 076 STUDENT PARKING 951. 06 3,200.00 .00 .00 911. 79 3,239.27 7124 076 LITERARY MAGAZINE 2,.795.00 .00 .00 .00 2,052.00 743.'00 7125 076 BOYS/GIRLS STATE S25.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 825.00 7126 076 GIFTED/TALENTED .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7127 076 CCECA .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7128 .00 076 PTA/PARTNERS/ETC 145.00 .00 .00 .00 34.55 110.45 7129 076 LOUNGE 4,041.41 970.29 .00 .00 768.15 4,243.55 7130 076 MUSICAL DRAMA 8,956.27 .00 .00 .00 .00 8,956.27 7131 076 MED PROF VICA 42 .11 .00 .00 .00 30.22 11. 89 7132 076 GUIDANCE 7,734.02 2,627.00 .00 .00 2,774.58 7,586.44 7133 076 BUSINESS .00 .00 .00 .00 .. 00 .00 7134 076 INTERACT 806.01 .00 .00 .00 '. 00 806.01 7135 076 PHYSICAL EDUCATION 115.58 .00 .00 .00 .00 115. 58 7136 076 STARS .42 3,740.00 .00 .00 3,656.46 83.96 7137 076 ECONOMICS 298.41 .00 .. 00 .00 .00 298.41 7138 076 BETA CLUB 3 50. 7 4 .00 .00 .00 149.04 201.70 7139 076 RENAISSANCE 9.15 .00 .00 .00 .00 9.15 ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL COMPUTER NETWORK PAGE NUMBER: DATE: 5 01/06/2012 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT MODULE NUM: STATM9AR TIME: 08:06:11 DETAILED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FOR PERIODS 1 THROUGH 6 OF 12 SELECTION CRITERIA: ALL FUND/SF FUND TITLE BEG BALANCE REVENUE NON-REVENUE NON-EXPEND EXPENDITURES END BALANCE 7140 076 SECURITY .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7141 076 BLA .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7142 076 SPANISH HONOR SOCIETY 190.46 176.00 .00 .00 176.00 190.46 7143 076 CHEERLEADERS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7144 076 DRILL TEAM .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7145 076 BASEBALL 4.65 .00 .00 .00 .00 4.65 7146 076 BASKETBALL BOYS 3,370.79 1,057.00 .00 .00 .00 4,427.79 7147 076 BASKETBALL GIRLS 889.32 2,562.00 .00 .00 1,944.00 1,507 .. 32 7148 076 FOOTBALL 86.78 .00 .00 .00 84.14 2.64 7149 076 SOFTBALL 162.76 .00 .00 .00 .00 162.76 7150 076 TRACK BOYS 75.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 75.00 7151 076 TRACK GIRLS 75.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 75.00 7152 076 VOLLEYBALL .00 1,275.00 .00 .00 .00 1,275.00 7153 RHODES SUPPLIES 187. 29 .00 .00 .00 .00 187.29 7154 076 WRESTLING .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7197 075 AP 170.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 170.00 7198 075 CHOIR 3 64. 71 3,735.00 .00 .00 2,997.52 1,102.19 7199 075 LADIES/GENTLEMENS CLU 449.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 449.00 7200 075 GENERAL 6,243.50 4,910.21 .00 .00 3,482.46 7,671.25 7201 075 LIBRARY 349.82 83.45 .00 .00 .00 433.27 7202 075 STUDENT COUNCIL 20.93 234.00 .00 .00 .00 254.93 ~ 7203 075 ART 45.08 .00 .00 .00 .00 45.08 7204 075 FBLA 382.89 .00 .00 .00 70.00 312.89 I 7205 075 SCIENCE 292.08 .00 .00 .00 .00 292.08 Vl 7206 075 FHA 32.94 .00 .00 .00 .00 32.94 7207 075 DRAMA 1,113.80 16,820.73 .00 .00 14,211.74 3,722.79 7208 075 TCHRS OF TOMORROW 520.42 .00 .00 .00 .00 520.42 7209 075 CRIME STOPPERS 679.46 .00 .00 .00 .00 679.46 7210 075 MU ALPHA THETA .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7211 075 KEY CLUB 21.23 .00 .00 .00 .00 21. 23 7212 075 GUN SAFETY .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7213 075 INTERNATIONAL CLUB 768. 32 .00 .00 .00 .00 768.32 7214 075 PROJECTS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7215 075 STUDENT ACTIVITIES 65.91 .00 .00 .00 .00 65.91 7216 075 LITERARY MAGAZINE 312.00 1,459.12 .00 .00 .00 1,771.12 7217 075 BOYS/GIRLS STATE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7218 075 SUNSHINE 812.93 .00 . 00 .OQ 337.35 475.58 7219 075 CCECA .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7220 075 LOUNGE 305.65 1,021.88 .00 .00 .00 1,327.53 7221 075 MED PROF VICA 275.50 412.00 .00 .00 200.00 487.50 7222 075 GUIDANCE 1,230.74 2.00 .00 .00 .00 1,232.74 7223 075 GERMAN .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 . 00 7224 075 BUSINESS 2,057.33 .00 .00 .00 .00 2,057.33 7225 075 PHYSICAL EDUCATION 85.73 .00 .00 .00 .00 85.73 7226 075 VIPS 66.24 .00 .00 .00 .00 66.24 7227 075 JROTC 109.44 .00 .00 .00 .00 109.44 7228 075 BETA CLUB 20.05 .00 .00 .00 .00 20.05 7229 075 DRUG \u0026amp; ALCOHOL 74.78 .00 .00 .00 36. 45 38.33 7230 075 QUIZ BOWL 820.42 1,180.00 .00 .00 166.20 1,234.22 7231 075 CHEERLEADERS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL COMPUTER NETWORK PAGE NUMBER: 6 DATE: 01/06/2012 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT MODULE NUM: STATM9AR TIME: 08:06:11 DETAILED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FOR PERIODS 1 THROUGH 6 OF 12 SELECTION CRITERIA: ALL FUND/SF FUND TITLE BEG BALANCE REVENUE NON-REVENUE NON-EXPEND EXPENDITURES END BALANCE 7232 075 DRILL TEAMS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7233 075 ATHLETICS BOYS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7234 075 ATHLETICS GIRLS 11.07 .00 .00 .00 .00 11. 07 7235 075 CHEERLEADERS-BLUE .18 .. 00 .00 .00 .00 .18 7236 075 CHEERLEADERS-GOLD .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7237 075 DRILL TEAM-BLUE 139. 21 .00 .00 .00 .00 139.21 7238 075 KEYSTONE 4,000.00 500.00 .00 .00 260.30 4,239.70 7239 075 NEWSPAPER .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7240 076A GENERAL 402.19 .00 .00 .00 97.77 304.42 7241 076A SCHOOL STORE 24.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 24.00 7242 076A STUDENT COUNCIL .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7243 076A TRAIL BLAZER 495.41 .00 .00 .00 .00 495.41 7244 076A LOUNGE 2,958.93 395. 72 .00 .00 .00 3,354.65 7245 076A HERO .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ~ 7246 076A YEARBOOK .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7270 702 GENERAL -545.61 1,356.40 .00 .00 I 105.00 705.79 7271 702 SCHOOL STORE 87.10 15.00 .00 .00 87.10 15. 00 ' 7272 702 LIBRARY .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7273 702 MUSIC 118.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 118. 00 7274 702 TEACHERS OF TOMORROW .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7275 702 MATHEMATICS 120.55 .00 .00 .00 99.62 20.93 7276 702 CAREER ORIENTATION .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7277 702 PTA/PARTNERS/ETC .00 1,061.25 .00 .00 .00 1,061.25 7278 702 BOOK FAIR .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7279 702 LOUNGE 148.53 .00 .00 .00 80.16 68.37 7280 702 ENGLISH DEPT .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7281 702 BAND 1.37 6,752.00 .00 .00 6,094.44 658.93 7282 702 FCA .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7283 702 SOCIAL STUDIES CLUB 116.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 116. 00 7284 702 RAMFEST 53.14 .00 .00 .00 .00 53.14 7285 702 RELATED ARTS 164.32 594.41 .00 .00 543.76 214.97 7286 702 HISPANIC SOCIETY .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7287 702 TEAM RANGERS 627.64 226.00 .00 .00 .00 853.64 7288 702 TEAM HIKERS 151. 45 61. 00 .00 .00 .00 212.45 7289 702 TEAM FORERUNNERS 150.21 42.00 .00 .00 .00 192. 21 7290 702 TEAM BELAYERS 63. 36 69.00 .00 .00 .00 132.36 7291 702 TEAM HANGGLIDERS 338.98 54. 00 .00 .00 .00 392.98 7292 702 FCCLA 57.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 57.00 7293 7.02 AETN TECH INST .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7294 702 CHEERLEADERS 366.22 3,189.90 .00 .00 2,502.16 1,053.96 7295 702 POM POM SQUAD .00 .00 .00 .00  . 00 .00 7296 702 ATHLETICS BOYS i, 404. 81 718.00 . 00 .00 767.42 1,355.39 7297 702 ATHLETICS GIRLS 463.14 520.00 .00 .00 287.38 695.76 7320 070 GENERAL, 5,259.52 1,934.46 .00 .00 272.55 6,921.43 7321 070 LIBRARY 1,216.53 .00 .00 .00 153. 27 1,063.26 7322 070 STUDENT COUNCIL 188.95 .00 .00 .00 .00 188.95 7323 070 MUSIC 29.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 29. 0.0 7324 070 ART 1,809.95 .00 .00 .00 854.05 955.90 7325 070 HOME ECONOMICS 3.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 3.00 7326 070 DRAMA 59.00 .00 .oo .00 .00 59.00 ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL COMPUTER NETWORK PAGE NUMBER: 7 DATE: 01/06/2012 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT MODULE NUM: STATM9AR TIME: 08:06:11 DETAILED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FOR PERIODS 1 THROUGH 6 OF 12 SELECTION CRITERIA: ALL FUND/SF FUND TITLE BEG BALANCE REVENUE NON-REVENUE NON-EXPEND EXPENDITURES END BALANCE 7327 070 CRIME STOPPERS 18.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 18.00 7328 070 CHAMPS 38.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7329 38.00 070 ODYSSEY OF THE MIND 3.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 3.00 7330 070 LITERARY MAGAZINE 32.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 32.00 7331 070 SPECIAL EDUCATION 1, 932 .. 80 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,932.80 7332 070 SUNSHINE 288.51 .00 .00 .00 .00 288.51 7333 070 GIFTED TALENTED 913.63 425.00 .00 .00 887.50 451.13 7334 070 KIWANIS KIDS CLUB 64.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 64.00 7335 070 FCCLA 386.24 1,103.50 . 00 .00 380.00 1,109.74 7336 070 SPECIAL OLYMPICS 39.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 39.00 7337 070 LOUNGE 1,588.50 445.10 .00 .00 .00 2,033.60 7338 070 SPORTS MEDICINE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7339 070 BAND 2,781.61 2,321.00 .00 .00 3,826.56 1,276.05 7340 070 CAROR 154.20 .00 .00 .00 .00 154. 20 7341 070 SOCIAL STUDIES CLUB 92.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 92.00 7342 070 CHEERLEADERS 273.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 273.00 7343 070 PEP CLUB 17.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 17.00 7344 070 ATHLETICS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7370 077 GENERAL 287.05 681.30 .00 .00 844.94 123.41 7371 077 SCHOOL STORE 501.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 501. 00 ~ 7372 077 LIBRARY 141.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 141.00 I 7373 077 STUDENT COUNCIL 462.07 1,102.95 .00 285.00 1-08. 98 1,171.04 -.J 7374 077 JOURNALISM .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7375 077 ART .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7376 077 TEACHERS OF TOMORROW .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7377 077 PROJECTS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7378 077 CBI 132.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 132,00 7379 077 SUNSHINE 61.88 165.00 .00 .00 215.98 10.90 7380 077 MGAP .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7381 077 PTA/PARTNERS/ETC 86.41 .00 .00 .00 .00 86.41 7382 077 LOUNGE 548.26 376.97 .00 .00 465.58 459.65 7383 077 MEMORYB OOK .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7384 077 BAND 2.70 .00 .00 .00 .00 2,70 7385 077 BUSINESS ED 201:00 .00 .00 .00 .00 201.00 7386 077 SCHOOL BASE TEAM .00 .00 .00 . 00 .00 .00 7387 077 FCCLA 115. 00 .00 .00 .00 .00 115. 00 7388 077 AR SCI/TECH .00 .0 0 .0-0 .00 .00 .00 7389 077 AETN TECH INST .oo .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7390 0,77 CHEERbEADERS 200.36 815.00 285.00 .00 1,070.18 230.18 7391 077 PEP CLUB 188.08 .00 .00 .00 121.56 66.52 7392 077 CHEERLEADER RED 144.30 .00 .00 .00 58.41 85.89 7420 059 GENERAL 471.78 1,045.70 .00 .00 566.42 951.06 7421 059 SCHOOL STORE 144.79 .00 .00 .00 .00 144.79 7422 059 STUDENT COUNCIL 188.76 .00 .00 .00 , . 00 188.76 7423 059 MUSIC 2,701.44 2,492.00 .00 .00 2,8~1.18 2,372.26 7424 059 SCIENCE 306.18 .00 .00 .00 116. 75 189.43 7425 059 MATHEMATICS 164.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 164.00 7426 059 PROJECTS 35.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 35.00 7427 059 ODYSSEY OF THE MIND .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7428 059 STUDENT ACTIVITIES 22.36 .00 .00 .00 .00 22.36 ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL COMPUTER NETWORK PAGE NUMBER: 8 DATE: 01/06/2012 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT MODULE NUM: STATM9AR TIME: 08:06:11 DETAILED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FOR PERIODS 1 THROUGH 6 OF 12 SELECTION CRITERIA: ALL FUND/SF FUND TITLE BEG BALANCE REVENUE NON-REVENUE NON-EXPEND EXPENDITURES END BALANCE 7429 059 SUNSHINE 90.77 420.00 .00 .00 .00 510. 77 7430 059 CONCESSIONS 122.10 .00 .00 .00 69.65 52.45 7431 059 PTA/PARTNERS/ETC 21. 84 .00 .00 .00 .00 21.84 7432 059 BOOK FAIR 2,372.66 2,2p6.71 .00 .00 3,977.51 601.86 7433 059 LOUNGE 529.47 399.60 .00 .00 386.83 542.24 7434 059 HERO 68.39 .00 .00 .00 .00 68.39 7435 059 ACCELERATED READING .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7436 059 GUIDANCE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7437 059 DISCOVERY CLUB 43.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 43.00 7438 059 TARGET .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7439 059 PARTNERS DONATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7450 050 GENERAL 772.20 .00 .00 .00 26.32 745.88 7451 050 SCHOOL STORE 2,188.65 .00 .00 .00 1,116.80 1,071.85 7452 050 LIBRARY 94.62 .00 .00 .00 .00 94.62 7453 050 PTA/PARTNERS/ETC 286.49 .00 .00 .00 105.73 180.76 7454 050 LOUNGE 696.86 226.20 .00 .00 .00 923.06 7455 050 LITERACY GRANT .00 383.07 .00 .00 .00 383.07 ~ 7470 058 GENERAL 945.10 98.00 .00 .00 .00 1,043.10 7471 058 SCHOOL STORE 1,213.00 .00 .00 .00 642.54 570.46 I 7472 058 LIBRARY .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 00 7473 058 PROJECTS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7474 058 PTA/PARTNERS/ETC 4,761.64 15,468.62 .00 .00 2,520.00 17,710.26 7475 058 LOUNGE 1,278.29 378 .11 .00 .00 558.27 1,098.13 7490 054 GENERAL .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7491 054 SCHOOL STORE 144.14 .00 .00 .00 58.32 85.82 7492 054 SUNSHINE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7493 054 PTA/PARTNERS/ETC .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7494 054 LOUNGE 545.85 296.65 .00 .00 307.07 7495 535.43 054 SCHOOL BASED TEAM .00 .00 .00 .oo .00 .00 7496 054 PARTNERS DONATIONS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7497 054 UNIFORMS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7510 069 GENERAL 2,518.72 120.92 .00 .00 48.55 2,591.09 7511 069 SCHOOL STORE 1,784.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,784.00 7512 069 LIBRARY 13. 00 .00 .00 .00 .00 13. 00 7513 069 ELEM CHOIR 576.31 1,390.00 .00 .00 1,168.21 798.10 7514 069 SUNSHINE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7515 069 PTA/PARTNERS/ETC 44.83 .00 .00 .00 .00 44.83 7516 069 LOUNGE 1,767.22 808.23 .00 .00 .00 2,575.45 7517 ,069 STAR QUEST .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7518 069 MUSEUM OF DIS GRANT .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7519 069 LITTER FREE 1,500.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,500.00 7530 060 GENERAL 208.17 .00 210.01 .00 .00 418.18 7531 060 SCHOOL STORE 854.26 .00 .00 .00 .00 854.26 7532 060 PROJECTS 151. 01 .00 .00 151.01 .00 .00 7533 060 CHAMPS 43.00 .00 .00 43.00 \\ .00 .00 7534 060 SUNSHINE 16.00 .00 .00 16.00 .00 .00 7535 060 PTA/PARTNERS/ETC 13. 00 .00 .00 13. 00 .00 .00 7536 060 BOOK FAIR 299.84 .00 .00 .00 .00 299.84 7537 060 LOUNGE 1,187.57 595.69 .00 .00 330.34 1,452.92 7538 060 PARTNERS DONATIONS 343.09 .00 13. 00 .00 .00 356.09 ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL COMPUTER NETWORK PAGE NUMBER: DATE: 9 01/06/2012 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT MODULE NUM: STATM9AR TIME: 08:06:11 DETAILED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FOR PERIODS 1 THROUGH 6 OF 12 SELECTION CRITERIA: ALL 'FUND/SF FUND TITLE BEG BALANCE REVENUE NON-REVENUE NON-EXPEND EXPENDITURES END BALANCE 7550 061 GENERAL 19.89 .00 .00 .00 .00 19.89 7551 061 SCHOOL STORE 675.00 1,100.99 .00 .00 1,280.28 495.71 7552 061 PROJECTS .00 .00 .00 .00 . 00 .00 7553 061 STUDENT ACTIVITIES 2.88 , . 00 .00 .00 .00 2.88 7554 061 SUNSHINE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7555 061 BOOK FAIR 75.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 75.00 7556 061 LOUNGE 222.32 191. 58 .00 .00 .00 413. 90 7557 061 STARS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7580 063 GENERAL 369.50 433.80 .00 .00 322.25 481.05 7581 063 SCHOOL STORE 400.63 39.61 .00 .00 227.58 212.66 7582 063 LITTER FREE 1,500.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,500.00 7583 063 PTA/PARTNERS/ETC 34.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 34.00 7584 063 BOOK FAIR 113. 9 5 2,202.71 .00 .00 2,202.71 113. 95 7585 063 LOUNGE 465.40 650.18 .00 .00 718. 68 396.90 7586 063 SCHOOL BASE TEAM 1,113.81 1,524.10 .00 .00 70.20 2,567.71 7600 055 GENERAL 1,737.05 11,495.70 .00 .00 11,398.95 1,833.80 ~ 7601 055 AFTERCARE 1,855.58 4,252.98 .00 .00 4,074.94 2,033.62 7602 055 MUSIC .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 I 7603 055 CHAMPS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 \\0 7604 055 LOUNGE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7605 055 SCHOOL BASE TEAM .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7606 055 POPS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7607 055 PTA .00 4,364.62 .00 .00 4,224.62 140.00 7608 055 MEDIA .00 198.00 .00 .00 .00 198.00 7620 064 GENERAL 1,599.35 46 .14 .00 .00 .00 1,645.49 7621 064 SCHOOL STORE 1,892.24 522.80 .00 .00 1,168.13 1,246.91 7622 064 PANDA PALS 125.00 107.00 .00 .00 .00 232.00 7623 064 SUNSHINE 229.41 .00 .00 .00 .00 229.41 7624 064 SPACE CAMP/KIWANIS .00 757.00 .00 .00 .00 757.00 7625 064 PTA/PARTNERS/ETC .00 500.00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 7626 064 BOOK FAIR 17.00 2,467.63 .00 .00 2,467.63 17.00 7627 064 LOUNGE 1,296.70 245.85 .00 .00 492.58 1,049.97 7628 064 HERO .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7629 064 LITTER FREE 1,256.95 .00 .00 .00  . 00 1,256.95 7650 065 GENERAL 6,616.07 1,831.29 .00 .00 1,551.73 6,895.63 7651 065 SCHOOL STORE 2,006.45 25.00 .00 .00 258.16 1,773.29 7652 065 PTA/fARTNERS/ETC 4,011.00 .oo .00 .00 .00 4,011.00 7653 065 LOUNGE 11,143.12 366.57 .00 .00 2,653.36 8,856.33 7654 095 MEDIA CENTER 1,804.08 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,804.08 7670 053 GENERAL 411. 23 1,025.24 .00 .00 1,085.75 350.72 7671 053 SCHOOL STOR\\\n: 291. 34 300.00 .00 .00 46.62 544. 72 7672 053 LITTER FREE 665.18 .00 .00 .00 .00 665.18 7673 053 LOUNGE 935.20 202.07 .00 .do 964.73 172.54 7690 056 GENERAL 590.00 .00 . 00 .00 40,_3. 92 186.08 7691 056 SCHOOL STORE 435.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 435.00 7692 056 LOUNGE 955.85 203.17 .00 .00 .00 1,159.02 7693 056 HERO .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .oo 7710 057 GENERAL -5. 22 16,663.32 .00 .00 16,663.32 -5.22 7711 0-57 SCHOOL STORE 27.96 . 2, 640. so .00 .00 1,277.86 1.390.90 7712 057 LIBRARY 4,154.09 5,371.60 .00 .00 352.46 9,173.23 ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL COMPUTER NETWORK PAGE NUMBER: 10 DATE: 01/06/2012 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT MODULE NUM: STATM9AR TIME: 08:06:11 DETAILED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FOR PERIODS 1 THROUGH 6 OF 12 SELECTION CRITERIA: ALL FUND/SF FUND TITLE BEG BALANCE REVENUE NON-REVENUE NON-EXPEND EXPENDITURES END BALANCE 7713 057 CHAMPS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7714 .00 057 PTA/PARTNERS/ETC 16.00 372. 66 .00 .00 382.72 5.94 7715 057 LOUNGE 391.33 709.81 .00 .00 813.92 287.22 7716 057 OT/PT 9.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 9.00 7717 057 GIFTED TALENTED 430.31 .00 .00 .00 .00 430.31 7718 057 READING RALLY -50.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 -50.00 7719 057 COUNSELOR -106.50 .00 .00 .00 .00 -106.50 7730 067 GENERAL 654.00 10.00 .oo .00 .00 664:oo 7731 067 SCHOOL STORE 553.46 .00 .00 .00 .00 553.46 7732 067 PTA/PARTNERS/ETC 490.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 490.00 7733 067 LOUNGE 2,101.64 262.69 .00 .00 22.20 2,342.13 7734 067 UNITED WAY WELFARE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7800 000 AD GENERAL 55,112.92 14,441.49 .00 .00 256.88 69,297.53 7801 000 AD OFFICE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7802 000 AD ATHLETICS 134,873.30 88,755.51 .00 3,000.00 45,909.32 174,719.49 7803 000 AD ATHLETICS BOYS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ~ 7804 000 AD ATHLETICS GIRLS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 I 7805 000 AD BASEBALL .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ....... 7806 000 AD SOCCER .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 0 7807 000 AD SOFTBALL .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7808 000 AD TRACK BOYS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7809 000 AD TRACK GIRLS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7810 000 AD LOCAL TOURNAMENTS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7811 000 AD BOYS BASKETBALL .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 . 00 7812 000 AD WRESTLING 1,928.98 5,918.00 3,000.00 .00 4,304.88 6,542.10 7830 000 TECH GENERAL 325.00 634.00 .00 .00 .00 959.00 7831 000 TECH LOUNGE 1,225.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1,225.00 7832 000 SE SERTOMA .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7840 000 TRANS GENERAL .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7841 000 TRANS LOUNGE 2,456.33 1,171.49 .00 .00 2,657.15 970.67 7850 000 PLNT SERV GENERAL .00 .00 .00 .OCi .00 .00 7851 000 PLNT SERV LOUNGE 5,198.01 301.79 .00 .00 2,417.51 3,082.29 7860 000 CHLO NUT GENERAL .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 7861 000 CHLO NUT LOUNGE 83.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 83.00 7900 000 COBRASUMMERI NSURANCE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 . 00 7995 COKE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TOTAL ACTIVITY FUND 492,034.57 336,94'6.26 3,508.01 3,508.01 253,817.64 575,163.19 8000 . FOOD SERVICE FUND .00 479,808.46 .00 .00 2,226,081.91 -1,746,273.45 8640 CH NUTR NSLP .00 1,256,675.65 .00 .00 .00 1,256,675.65 8645 CH NUTR SBP .00 510,125.39 .00 .00 .00 510,125.39 8655 CH NUTR SNACKS .00 30,970.55 .00 .00 . 00. 30,970.55 8672 ARRA EQUIPMENT .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TOTAL FOOD SERVICE FUND .00 2,277,580.05 .00 .00 2. 226\n,.001. 91 51,498.14 TOTAL 18,964,756.93 50,806,017.19 22,655,984.09 22,679,853.61 43,676,836.64 26,070,067.96 01/06/12 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PAGE 1 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/12 SUMMARY REVENUE STATUS REPORT (BOARD FORMAT) SELECTION CRITERIA: 1=1 AND orgn.key_orgn = revledgr.key_orgn AND account.acct= revledgr.account PERIOD YEAR TO DATE AVAILABLE YTD/ ACCOUNT - - - - TITLE - - - - - BUDGET RECEIPTS RECEIVABLES REVENUE BALANCE BUD 11110 PROPERTY TAXES-CURRENT 17,999,557.90 16,207.65 .00 16,630,821.86 1,368,736.04 92.40 11120 PROPERTY TAX-40% BY 6/30 8,462,655.73 .00 .00 .00 8,462,655.73 .00 11140 PROPERTY TAX-DELINQUENT 1,925,000.00 290,352.07 .00 1,018,139.68 906,860.32 52.89 11150 EXCESS COMMISSION 450,000.00 .00 .00 .00 450,000.00 11160 .00 LAND REDEMP-IN STATE SALE 260,000.00 8,810.91 .00 107,091.17 152,908.83 41.19 11400 PENALTIES/INTEREST ON TAX 11,000.00 .00 .00 .00 11,000.00 .00 13120 SUMMER SCHOOL 43,000.00 .00 .00 4,045.00 38,955.00 9.41 13122 TUITION DRIVERS ED .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 13140 DAY CARE 143,000.00 11,109.28 .00 58,632.52 84,367.48 41.00 15100 INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 167,150.00 9,595.36 .00 48,046.81 119, 103. 19 28. 74 16210 STUDENT 440,000.00 32,173.27 .00 221,908.85 218,091.15 50.43 16215 A LA CARTE INCOME 485,000.00 28,034.64 .00 211,146.36 273,853.64 43. 54. 16220 ADULT 38,000.00 2,717.25 .00 15,291.52 22,708.48 40. 24 16300 SPECIAL FUNCTIONS 11,000.00 145.80 .00 331.38 10,668.62 3.01 16900 OTHER FOOD SVS REVENUE 11,500.00 .00 .00 5,429.50 6,070.50 47. 21 17110 ATHLETICS 2,890.00 837.00 .00 5,918.00 -3,028.00 204.78 17200 SALES 446,599.00 54,945.36 .00 261,784.24 184,814.76 58.62 17500 ENTERPRISE ACTIVITIES 22,775.00 867.24 .00 41,424.88 -18,649.88 181.89 17900 OTHER STDNT ACTIVITY REV 12,000.00 260.00 .00 22,737.73 -10,737.73 189.48 r\u0026lt; 19120 OTHER RENT-LAND OWNED LEA 30,000.00 3,510.00 .00 24,060.00 5,940.00 80.20 19130 LEA BUILDGS \u0026amp; FACILITIES 36,000.00 4,600.00 .00 21,396.00 14,604.00 59.43 -I 19200 PRIVATE CONTRIBUTIONS 12,350.00 753.00 .00 6,844.62 5,505.38 55.42 19300 SALES OF SUPPLIES \u0026amp; MATER .00 634.00 .00 634.00 -634.00 .00 19510 OTHER LEA WITHIN STATE 3,121.68 .00 .00 3,121.68 .00 100.00 19800 REFUNDS OF PRIOR YR EXPEN 123,000.00 113. 40 .00 797,733.47 -674,733.47 648.56 19900 MISC REV FR LOCAL SOURCES 122,000.00 52,965.54 .00 234,828.88 -112, 828. 88 192.48 21200 SEVERANCE TAX 8,000.00 2,379.67 .00 5,681.51 2,318.49 71.02 21900 OTHER REV FR COUNTY 2,800.00 .00 .00 .00 2,800.00 .00 31101 FOUNDATION FUNDING 34,983,681.00 3,180,335.00 .00 15,901,671.00 19,082,010.00 45.45 31103 98% TAX COLLECT RATE GUAR 335,882.00 .00 .00 .00 335,882.00 .00 31460 DECLINING ENROLLMENT 766,771.00 .00 .00 .00 766,771.00 .00 31900 OTHER 7,200.00 .00 .00 .00 7,200.00 .00 32227 COLLEGE PREP ENRICH PGM .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 32250 PATHWISE MENTORING GRANT 85,000.00 58,600.00 .00 58,600.00 26,400.00 68.94 32253 PATHWISE MENTOR TRAINING .00 .00 .00 7,145.00 -7,145.00 .00 32256 PROFESSIONAL DEV. ACT 59 362,980.00 .00 .00 362,980.00 .00 100.00 32260 AR GAME \u0026amp; FISH ACT 799 .00 .00 .00 1,375.00 -1,375.00 .00 32290 OTHER GRANTS AND AID 62,109.00 .00 .00 .00 62,109.00 .00 32314 SE ESY 9,300.00 .00 .00 15,170.00 -5,870.00 163.12 32350 EARLY CHLO SP ED 1,500,000.00 .00 .00 687,050.00 812,950.00 45.80 32355 SE CAT LOSS FUNDING 65,000.00 . 00 .00 .00 65,000.00 .00 32360 EXCEPTIONAL CHILD GRANT 3,000.00 .00 .00 .00 3,000.00 .00 32361 GT ADVANCED PLACEMENT 8,000.00 .00 .00 7,300.00 700.00 91. 25 32370 ALT LEARNING ENVIRONMENT 618,510.00 .00 .00 560,569.00 57,941.00 90.63 32371 LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIEN 108,410.00 113,022.00 .00 113,022.00 -4,612.00 104. 25 32381 NSLA ACT 59 2,996,532.00 368,250.00 .00 1,745,412.00 1,251,120.00 58.25 32520 MATCHING (STATE) 27,650.00 .00 .00 .00 27,650.00 .00 32710 AR BETTER CHANCE(ABC)GRNT 2,585,160.00 .00 .00 1,321,434.00 ).,263,726.00 51.12 32740 INFANT/TODDLER PROGRAM . 6,000. 00 .00 .00 .00 6,000.00 .00 32745 SMART START/LITERACY 87,000.00 .00 .00 88,717.00 -1,717.00 101. 97 32812 MAJORITY-MINORITY 5,560,000.00 556,485.00 .00 2,225,940.00 3,334,060.00 40.03 32813 TRANSPORTATION 1,600,000.00 951,264.43 .00 951,264.43 648,735.57 59.45 RUN DATE 01/06/12 TIME 08:09:33ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL COMPUTER NETWORK - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENTS YSTEMS 01/06/12 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PAGE 2 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/12 SUMMARY REVENUE STATUS REPORT (BOARD FORMAT) SELECTION CRITERIA: 1=1 AND orgn.key_orgn = revledgr.key_orgn AND account.acct= revledgr.account PERIOD YEAR TO DATE AVAILABLE YTD/ ACCOUNT - - - - TITLE - - - - - BUDGET RECEIPTS RECEIVABLES REVENUE BALANCE BUD 32814 TR AND INS COURT STLMENT 2,600,000.00 221,825.64 .00 1,195,754.56 1,404,245.44 45.99 32912 GENERAL FACILITIES 65,225.00 .00 .00 32,612.00 32,613.00 50.00 32915 DEBT SERVICE FUNDING 154,054.00 .00 .00 77,027.00 77,027.00 50.00 32916 OHS HUMAN SV WKR INITIATI 75,000.00 7,363.64 .00 25,772.70 49,227.30 34.36 32924 PARTNERSHIP ACAD FACILITI .00 .00 .00 30,228.78 -30,228.78 .00 43160 ROTC 121,000.00 10,930.29 .00 58,423.04 62,576.96 48.28 43181 21ST CENTURY COMM LC 75,000.00 .00 .00 35,000.00 40,000.00 46.67 45110 ESEA CHl COMP(R) 100-297 5,722,840.00 .00 .00 618,787.25 5,104,052.75 10.81 45114 TITL I SCH !MPV GRT 1003 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 45119 TITLE IA-ARRA 84.389 1,335,991.00 783,528.71 .00 1,210,666.38 125,324.62 90.62 45121 TITLE I SCH IMPR-ARRA .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 45124 ESEA STAB-ARRA 84.394 .00 .00 .00 -1,354.00 1,354.00 . 0.0 45129 ED JOBS FEE ARRA 337,282.00 292,619.00 .00 337,282.00 .00 100.00 45140 SBMHAA HOMELESS ASSIS ACT 42,000.00 .00 .00 40,000.00 2,000.00 95.24 45310 voe BASIC GRNT-ENTITLEMNT 180,725.00 .00 .00 -6,816.36 187,541.36- 3.77 45318 VOC-SUPP GRNTS-IMPROV ACT 17,570.00 .00 .00 .00 17,570.00 .00 t-\u0026lt; 45510 SL 4 LUNCHES-TYPE A 2,025,000.00 229,124.19 .00 1,256,675.65 768,324.35 62.06 I 45511 OHS LUNCH REIMBURSEMENT 51,000.00 5,718.53 .00 24,712.21 26,287.79 48.46 tv 45520 SL 11 LUNCH-FREE/REDUCED 800,000.00 90,361.53 .00 510,125.39 289,874.61 63.77 45540 SNACK REIMB THRU ADE 73,700.00 8,302.52 ,00 30,970.55 42,729.45 42.02 45561 REG COMMODITIES (OHS) 185,000.00 .00 .00 .00 185,000.00 .00 45562 COMMODITIES FFVP 11,400.00 .00 .00 .00 11,400.00 .00 45613 IDEA VIB PASS THROUGH 1,600,000.00 62,147.26 .00 700,853.77 899,146.23 43.80 45621 IDEA-ARRA 84.391 426,870.00 299,337.26 .00 303,531.26 123,338.74 71.11 45622 IDEA PK-ARRA 84.392 213,772.00 2,709.52 .00 57,562.51 156,209.49 26.93 45630 EARLY CHILD-DISAD INDIVID 475,000.00 .00 .00 116,827.00 358,173.00 24.60 45805 HOMELESS STIMULUS .00 2,508.56 .00 2,508.56 -2,508.56 .00 45810 1003G SCH IMPRV 354,590.00 54,353.55 .00 105,511.83 249,078.17 29.76 45910 MEDICAID REIMBURSEMENT 500,000.00 12,192.01 .00 22,661.61 477,338.39 4.53 45913 ARMAC MEDICAID ADM CLAIM 325,000.00 80,965.56 .00 80,965.56 244,034.44 24.91 45925 IMPROVING TEACH QUALITY 545,136.00 42,742.53 .00 145,028.85 400,107.15 26.60 45935 ENGLISH LANG ACQUISITION 40,323.00 .00 .00 .00 40,323.00 .00 45980 AIDS EDUCATION ACT 1,000.00 .00 .00 .00 1,000.00 .00 45996 FED WRKFRCE TITLE I B .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 51800 REFUNDING SAVINGS .00 .00 .00 27,535.81 -27,535.81 .00 52200 TRANS FROM OPERATING FUND 40,680,867.00 3,439,220.93 .00 22,572,139.43 18,108,727.57 55.49 52300 TRANS FROM BUILDING FUND .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 52400 TRANS FROM DEBT SERV FUND .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 52700 TRANS FROM STUDENT ACTVTY .00 .00 .00 3,508.01' -3,508.01 .00 52900 INDIRECT COST REIMB 110,000.00 .00 .00 .00 110,000.00 .00 53100 SALE OF EQUIPMENT 1,000.00 .00 .00 .00 1,000.00 .00 53400 COMPEN-LOSS FIXED ASSETS 100,000.00 1,034.71 .00 52,800.84 47,199.16 52.80 53410 INSURANCE REIMB .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TOTAL REPORT 142,292,929.31 11,395,953.81 .00 73,462,001.28 68,830,928.03 51.63 \\ RUN DATE 01/06/12 TIME 08:09:33ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL COMPUTER NETWORK- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENTS YSTEMS 01/06/12 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ACCOUNTING PAGE 1 PERIOD: 6/12 SUMMARY EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT (BOARD FORMAT) SELECTION CRITERIA: l=l AND orgn.key_orgn expledgr.key_orgn AND orgn.yr = expledgr.yr PERIOD ENCUMBRANCES YEAR TO DATE AVAILABLE YTD/ ACCOUNT - - - - - TITLE - - - - - BUDGET EXPENDITURES OUTSTANDING ENC+ EXP BALANCE BUD 61110 CRT SALARY 41,475,836.58 3,430,545.94 .00 16,678,342.62 24,797,493.96 40.21 61120 CLS SALARY 17,141,782.69 1,384,909.96 .00 7,400,383.92 9,741,398.77 43.17 61210 TEMP-CRT 1,185,606.78 85,002.01 .00 278,216.53 907,390.25 23.47 61220 TEMP-CLS 310,014.75 20,783.13 .00 137,337.24 172,677.51 44.30 61320 OVERTIME CLS 35,158.00 828.25 .00 11,466.67 23,691.33 32.61 61510 ADD COMP CRT 486,913.00 71,850.00 .00 72,350.00 414,563.00 14.86 61520 ADD COMP CLS 401,497.00 56,950.00 .00 57,250.00 344,247.00 14.26 61610 WORKSHOPS CRT 71,117.76 .00 .00 22,580.00 48,537.76 31.75 61620 WORKSHOPS CLS 12,000.00 .00 .00 8,220.00 3,780.00 68.50 61710 CRT SUBS 498,139.00 76,056.99 .00 290,338.17 207,800.83 58.28 61720 CLS SUBS 38,090.00 1,228.00 .00 20,077.22 18,012.78 52.71 61810 CRT UNUSED SL 93,430.00 5,535.00 .00 10,110.00 83,320.00 10. -82 61820 CLS UNUSED SL 31,575.00 .00 .00 2,012.50 29,562.50 6.37 61930 EARLY RET INCENTIVE-CRT 24,500.00 14,547.05 .00 30,206.40 -5,706.40 123.29 61940 EARLY RET INCENTIVE-CLS 4,600.00 .00 .00 4,599.72 .28 99.99 62110 CRT GROUP INS 407,894.32 33,604.73 .00 160,775.80 247,118.52 39.42 62120 CLS GROUP INS 283,275.15 22,264.17 .00 121,721.91 161,553.24 42.97 62210 CRT SOC SEC 2,599,383.73 211,604.63 .00 1,006,054.87 1,593,328.86 38. 70 62220 CLS SOC SEC 962,678.57 78,979.24 .00 415,416.85 547,261.72 43.15 62260 CRT MEDICARE 617,671.60 49,757.18 .00 236,501.86 381,169.74 38. 29 62270 CLS MEDICARE 266,787.17 20,974.36 .00 108,723.97 158,063.20 40.75 ~ 62310 CRT TCH RET 6,014,745.15 505,793.67 .00 2,397,325.77 3,617,419.38 39.86 62320 CLS TCH RET 2,386,982.10 207,463.07 .00 1,064,153.74 1,322,828.36 44.58 62410 CRT TUIT REIMB 33,100.00 1,394.92 .00 3,416.42 29,683.58 10.32 62510 CRT UNEMP COMP 1.00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 .00 62520 CLS UNEMP COMP 95,029.00 37,018.00 .oo 37,018.00 58,011.00 38.95 62610 CRT WKR COMP 183,205.00 .00 .00 .00 183,205.00 .00 62620 CLS WKR COMP 252,642.45 .00 .00 .00 252,642.45 .00 62710 CRT HEALTH 2,321,382.75 198,632.65 .00 948,911.07 1,372,471.68 40.88 62720 CLS HEALTH 1,771,147.81 143,369.52 .00 775,618.54 995,529.27 43.79 62820 CLS PUB RET CONT 20,663.00 1,815.78 .oo 11,504.10 9,158.90 55.67 62910 0TH BEN CRT 6,000.00 500.00 .00 3,000.00 3,000.00 50.00 62920 0TH BEN CLS 18,000.00 .00 .00 6,712.62 11,287.38 37.29 63110 STAFF SERV .00 .00 .oo .00 .00 .00 63120 MANAGEMENTS ERV 57,464.00 .00 .00 19,974.00 37,490.00 34. 76 63130 BOARD OF ED SERV 17,000.00 .00 .oo 9,165.91 7,834.09 53.92 63210 INSTRUCTION SERV 963,867.31 6,863.00 .00 68,880.35 894,986.96 7.15 63230 CONSULTING EDUCATIONAL 848,503.30 87,302.79 89,764.29 604,935.97 243,567.33 71. 29 63310 PD-CRT 599,940.72 5,627.10 13,192.00 214,147.92 385,792.80 35.69 63320 PD- CLS 11,600.00 190.00 60.00 1,907.75 9,692.25 16.45 63410 PUPIL SERV 7,844.00 .00 .oo .00 7,844.00 .00 63431 FIN AUDITS 40,000.00 3,000.00 .00 22,000.00 18,000.00 55.00 63440 LEGAL 13,000.00 .oo .00 2,197.50 10,802.50 16.90 63441 LEGAL DEFENSE 36,000.00 241. 70 .00 9,055.01 26,944.99 25.15 63442 LEGAL PLAINTIFF SUE ST .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 63443 LEGAL PLAINTIFF NT SUE ST 116,210.53 .00 .00 116,210.53 .00 100.00 63444 LEGAL CONTRACTS 30,000.00 .oo .00 3,629.38 26,370.62 12.10 63445 LEGAL RESEARCH-OPINION 10,000.00 .00 .00 59.00 9,941.00 .59 63450 MEDICAL 500.00 .oo .00 490.00 10.00 98.00 63460 INFORMATION TECH 2,000.00 .00 .00 544.91 1,455.09 27.25 63470 ARCHITECT .oo .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 63490 OTHER PROF SERV 1,098,921.03 30,667.92 15,553.25 229,455.39 869,465.64 20.88 RUN DATE 01/06/12 TIME 08:09:35ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL COMPUTER NETWORK - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS 01/06/12 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PAGE 2 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/12 SUMMARY EXPENDITURE STATUS REPORT (BOARD FORMAT) SELECTION CRITERIA: l=l AND orgn.key_orgn expledgr.key_orgn AND orgn.yr = expledgr.yr PERIOD ENCUMBRANCES YEAR TO DATE AVAILABLE YTD/ ACCOUNT - - - - - TITLE - - - - - BUDGET EXPENDITURES OUTSTANDING ENC+ EXP BALANCE BUD 63491 SECURITY 24,900.00 146.01 .00 876.06 24,023.94 3.52 63530 SOFTWARE MAINT \u0026amp; SU~PORT 68,440.00 57,731.00 .00 64,796.56 3,643.44 94.68 63590 OTHER TECH SERV 193,718.00 -435.00 3,591.75 106,899.63 86,818.37 55 .18 63900 0TH PROF/TECH SERV 918,700.24 28,614.97 73,438.89 374,719.22 543,981.02 40.79 64110 WATER/SEWER 126,980.00 8,904.86 .00 57,534.51 69,445.49 45.31 64210 DISPOSAL/SANATATION 100,300.00 8,662.33 1,506.23 46,175.98 54,124.02 46.04 64231 PEST CONTROL 34,000.00 2,867.40 4,364.00 16,362.80 17,637.20 64240 48.13 LAWN CARE 307,000.00 5,846.40 55,947.40 187,796.29 119,203.71 61.17 64310 NON TECH REP/MAINT 581,505.46 5,741.86 54,517.13 212,655.64 368,849.82 36.57 64320 TECH REP/MAINT 1,658,541.26 628.18 127,334.56 383,578.62 1,274,962.64 23 .13 64410 LAND \u0026amp; BLDGS 27,300.00 .00 15,750.00 21,538.66 5,761.34 78.90 64420 EQUIP \u0026amp; VEHICLES 27,414.00 150.00 .00 13,430.62 13,983.38 48\". 99 64421 TRANSPORTATION 282,450.00 1,200.00 .00 23,597.40 258,852.60 8.35 64430 COPIER/COMP LEASE 591,450.00 34,434.52 396,312.00 578,050.00 13,400.00 97.73 64500 CONSTRUCT SERV 768,350.24 9,690.00 49,140.00 345,622.59 422,727.65 44.98 65210 PROPERTY INS 390,000.00 .00 .00 377,859.00 12,141.00 96.89 65220 LIABILITY INS 1,348.00 .00 .00 1,348.00 .00 100.00 65240 FLEET INS 120,000.00 .00 .00 102,295.00 17,705.00 85.25 65250 ACCIDENT INS FOR STUDENTS 40,000.00 .00 .00 28,457.00 11,543.00 71.14 65290 OTHER INS 58,000.00 .00 .00 .00 58,000.00 .00 65310 TELEPHONE 245,660.00 17,501.25 25,628.03 148,390.41 97,269.59 60.40 ~ 65320 POSTAGE 55,458.97 7,690.00 .00 35,131.60 20,327.37 63.35 65400 ADVERTISING 95,898.35 33,065.75 3,766.94 76,604.64 19,293.71 79.88 I 65500 PRINTING \u0026amp; BINDING 142,228.79 9,204.68 627.05 78,474.27 63,754.52 55.17 N 65610 TO LEA WITHIN ST 1,247,500.00 .00 .00 1,119,701.19 127,798.81 89.76 65630 TO PRIVATE SCHOOLS 246,592.21 112,875.00 13,000.00 138,875.00 107,717.21 56.32 65690 OTHER TUITION 59,806.74 .00 14,350.00 28,700.00 31,106.74 47.99 65810 TRAVEL CRT 141,306.53 6,302.26 859.88 24,956.87 116,349.66 17.66 65820 TRAVEL CLS 18,607.12 1,275.24 3,100.98 8,382.70 10,224.42 45.05 65830 TRVL CRT-OUT DIST 37,265.80 1,179.54 126.18 10,359.98 26,905.82 27.80 65840 TRVL CLS OUT DIST 3,236.88 .00 .00 212.52 3,024.36 6.57 65850 TRVL CRT OUT ST 55,215.10 5,231.22 .00 22,204.88 33,010.22 40.22 65860 TRVL CLS OUT ST 2,150.00 404.80 .00 1,513.92 636.08 70.41 65870 TRAVEL NON EMP 10,843.80 540.75 .00 1,532.68 9,311.12 14 .13 65880 MEALS 52,796.58 500.38 103.12 19,666.26 33,130.32 37.25 65890 LODGING 98,704.22 1,243.36 259.45 31,266.84 67,437.38 31. 68 66100 GEN SUPPLIES 4,837,712.22 206,806.98 323,110.70 1,656,604.94 3,181,107.28 34.24 66107 SUPPLIES 500-999.99 56,635.00 .00 6,794.75 18,878.72 37,756.28 33.33 66108 FOOD-WORKSHOPS/MEETINGS 37,412.69 691. 39 613.13 17,520.12 19,892.57 46.83 66114 SUPPLIES-FLOORING 21,500.00 1,.916. 43 5,693.66 32,190.27 -10,690.27 149.72 66115 SUPPLIES-ROOFING 8,000.00 .00 .00 4,204.93 3,795.07 52.56 66119 SUPPLIES-HVAC 87,261.19 5,096.27 14,336.21 87,706.47 -445.28 100.51 66210 NAT GAS 404,800.00 25,138.25 .00 58,608.79 346,191.21 14.48 66220 ELECTRICITY 1,238,200.00 78,841.92 .00 606,953.88 631,246.12 49.02 66260 GASOLINE 626,700.00 24,049.70 141,055.42 391,067.60 235,632.40 62.40 66300 FOOD 1,769,886.27 149,494.41 562,344.37 1,363,781.44 406,104.83 77.05 66410 TEXTBOOKS 1,194,841.11 .00 .00 1,051,578.68 143,262.43 88.01 66420 LIBRARY BOOKS 266,803.48 44,109.62 25,031.72 139,372.00 127,431.48 52.24 66430 PERIODICALS 29,778.50 860.92 125.92 10,995.59 18,782.91 36.92 66440 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 4,481.00 208.64 434.70 3,103.92 1,377.08 69.27 66500 TECH SUPPLIES 5,054.00 .00 .00 3,496.04 1,557.96 69.17 66510 SOFTWARE 193,711.53 67,045.96 4,351.32 102,051.71 91,659.82 52.68 RUN DATE 01/06/12 TIME 08:09:42ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL COMPUTER NETWORK - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS 01/06/12 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 6/12 SUMMARYE XPENDITURE STATUS REPORT PAGE 3 (BOARD FORMAT) SELECTION CRITERIA: 1=1 AND orgn.key_orgn expledgr.key_orgn AND orgn.yr = expledgr.yr PERIOD ENCUMBRANCES YEAR TO DATE AVAILABLE YTD/ ACCOUNT - - - - - TITLE - - - - - BUDGET EXPENDITURES OUTSTANDING ENC+ EXP BALANCE BUD 66520 TECH SUPP OTHER 15,671.00 117.73 3,088.04 6,668.24 9,002.76 42.55 66521 TECH SUP \u0026lt;$1000.0 (INSUR) 1,000.00 .00 .00 .00 1,000.00 .00 66527 ' TECH SUP \u0026lt;$1000.00 561,437.81 54,639.24 49,220.52 334,543.47 226,894.34 59.59 66900 OTHER SUPPLIES \u0026amp; MATERIAL 15,000.00 .00 9,044.12 14,903.00 97.00 99.35 67310 MACHINERY 29,064.68 .00 5,002.56 11,692.08 17,372.60 40.23 67320 VEHICLES 440,876.55 .00 .00 344,157.00 96,719.55 78.06 67330 FURNITURE \u0026amp; FIXTURES 7,600.00 .00 .00 1,263.60 6,336.40 16.63 67340 TECH REL HARDWARE 1,361,190.12 121,510.28 38,800.88 896,207.91 464,982.21 65.84 67341 TECH REL HARDWARE( INSUR) .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 67350 TECH SOFTWARE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 67390 OTHER EQUIPMENT 26,190.56 9,471.88 .00 18,887.44 7,303.12 72 .12 68100 DUES AND FEES 124,187.30 6,088.00 509.00 78,163.53 46,023.77 62. 94. 68200 JUDGMENTS AGAINST LEA 25,000.00 .00 .00 .00 25,000.00 .00 68300 INTEREST 1,748,364.00 125,850.47 166,452.06 425,850.47 1,322,513.53 24.36 68400 INDIRECT COST .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 68600 PENALTIES \u0026amp; INTEREST .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 68700 OUT OF COURT SETTLEMENTS 5,800.00 301.44 .00 2,119.54 3,680.46 36.54 68800 TAXES .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 68820 IMPROVEMENTT AX .00 .00 .oo .00 .00 .00 68900 MISC EXPENDITURES 343.72 .00 .oo .00 343. 72 .00 69100 REDEMPTION OF PRINCIPAL 104,206.17 104,206.17 .00 104,206.17 .00 100.00 ~ 6699332100 TTOO OSAPELRAARTYI NFUGN FDU ND 40,008,009.00 3,439,220.93 .00 16,165,744.11 23,842,264.89 40.41 .00 .00 .00 6,392,895.32 -6,392,895.32 .00 w 69330 TO BUILDING FUND .00 .00 .00 13,500.00 -13,500.00 .00 69360 TO FEDERAL GRANTS FUND .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 69370 TO STUDENT ACTIVITY FUND .00 .00 .00 3,508.01 -3,508.01 .00 69380 TO FOOD SERVICE FUND 620,325.00 .00 .00 .00 620,325.00 .00 69400 PROGRAM FUNDING RETURN .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TOTAL REPORT 148,614,411.44 11,622,164.15 2,318,302.21 68,674,992.46 79,939,418.98 46.21 RUN DATE 01/06/12 TIME 08:09:44ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL COMPUTERN ETWORK- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENTS YSTEMS ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL COMPUTER NETWORK PAGE NUMBER: 112 DATE: 01/09/2012 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT t-ODULE NUH: BNKREIAR TIME: 10:14:46 BANK RECONCILIATION REPORT SORT BY CHECK NO F'OR PERIOD 6 Of 12 ALL CHECKS SELECTION CRITERIA: genledgr.account'OIOlO' CHECK DATE CLEARED DATE CHECK PAYEE NAME NIKlER OUTSTAND!llG TOTAL OIITSTANDING CHECKS fOR PERIOD  TOTAL Of C/\\NCELLED CHECKS E'OR PERIOD  TOTAL CHECKS WRITTEN E'OR PERIOD 1. BALANCE SHOWN ON BANK STATEMENI' AT PERIOD END: 2. ADD: CASH IN TRANSIT AT END Of PERIOD: 3 SUB-TOTAL: 4. DEDUCT OUTSTANDING CHECKS E'OR PERIOD: 5. ADJUSTED BANK BALANCE AT END Of PERIOD: 6. CAS!i BALANCE AT END Of PERIOD: 7. VARIANCE: I Jl!lY\nAugj Sep\nQct, NOV jJEC! VARIANCE (98,12F5l (98,1~1U.) (98.1~ !!z.-~ (98, 12_~_7_51 (98, 12.J. :0 (98, 12_87. 2 2,553,468.03 4,732,160.68 16827005. 09 676. 95 N-1 C/\\NCELLED 4,650,795.54 I 6827682. 04 25534 6B. 03 14274214.01 14372342. 76 -9B12B. 75 I Revenue from Local Sources Prooertv Taxes-Ooeratina Fund Property Taxes-Current Property Taxes- 40% Pullback Prooertv Taxes -Delinauent Excess Commissions Land Redemption Penalties \u0026amp; Interest on Taxes Total Property Taxes Other Local Revenue Tuition-Summer School/Dav Care Interest on Investments Rentals Contributions/Donations Misc Rev From Local Total Other Local Revenue Total Local Revenue From Intermediate Source !Severance Tax !Other Revenue from Countv To tal From Intermediate Revenue From State Sources Unrestricted State Equalization Aid Student Declining Enrollment Other Unrestricted Grants-in-Aid 980/o URT Sunolement To tal from State Sources-Unrestricted Revenue from State Restricted Regular Education Special Education Early Childhood M-to-M Non-Instr Pgms Total State Restricted Other Sources-Nonrevenue Indirect Cost Sale of Eauioment Reimbursement-Loss of Fixed Assets Tptal Other Sources Total Revenue Operations Buildina Fund Building Fund-Partnership capital Outlay Fund Federal Fund Child Nutrition Fund Activitv Fund TOTAL REVENUE STIMULUS ARRA-Stabilization ARRA-TITLE I ARRA-IDEA ARRA-IDEA PK ARRA-Homeless ARRA1003G (RCMSl ARRA Title I Sch Imprv ARRA-Ed Jobs Fund TOTAL ARRA North Little Rock School District Period 06 - December 2011 Budaet Per 06 Actual YTD Actual $16,747,075.90 $15,058.36 $15,577,155.63 $7,627,667.73 $0.00 $0.00 $1 800,000.00 $271,933.32 $953 785.59 $450,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $260,000.00 $8,810.91 $107,091.17 $11,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $26,895,743.63 $295,802.59 $16,638,032.39 $186,000.00 $11,109.28 $62,677.52 $115 000.00 $9 084.64 $44.957.20 $66 000.00 $8110.00 $45.456.00 $1400.00 $753.00 $2.480.00 $248,121.68 $53,078.94 $1,035,684.03 $616,521.68 $82,135.86 $1,191,254.75 $27,512,265.31 $377 938.45 $17 829,287.14 $8,000.00 $2,379.67 $5,681.51 $2,800.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10 800.00 $2 379.67 $5.681.51 $34,983,681.00 $3,180,335.00 $15,901,671.00 $766,771.00 $0.00 $0.00 $7,200.00 $0.00 $0.00 $335,882.00 so.oo $0.00 $36 093.534.00 $3 180.335.00 $15 901,671.00 $510,089.00 $58,600.00 $422,955.00 $5,308,752.00 $481,272.00 $3,135,668.00 $2,678,160.00 $0.00 $1,410,151.00 $9,760,000.00 $1,729,575.07 $4,372,958.99 $294,279.00 $7,363.64 $135,411.70 $18 551,280.00 $2 276,810.71 $9,477,144.69 0.00 0.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100 000.00 $1,034.71 $52,800.84 $101,000.00 $1,034.71 $52,800.84 $82 268 879.31 $5 838,498.54 $43,266.585.18 $50.000.00 $317.14 $29,553.99 S0.00 SO.DO $30.228.78 $2 212.470.00 $19,568.04 Sl.118.020.32 $9 645.594.00 $208.977.65 $1.811.730.72 $4 161.050.00 $396.754.65 $2.277 .580.05 $495,564.00 $57.560.26 $336.946.26 $98,833,557.31 $6 521,676.28 $48,870,645.30 Budaet Per06 YTD 0.00 0.00 -$1,354.00 1 335.991.00 783.528.71 $1 210.666.38 426.870.00 299.337.26 $303.561.26 213,772.00 2,709.52 $57,562.51 0.00 2,508.56 $2,508.56 354,590.00 54,353.55 $105,511.83 0.00 0.00 $0.00 337.282.00 292.619.00 $337.282.00 2 668,505.00 1 435,056.60 $2 015,738.54 0- 1 Balance 0/o $1,169,920.27 93.01% $7,627,667.73 0.00% $846 214.41 52.99% $450,000.00 0.00% $152,908.83 41.19% $11,000.00 0.00% $10,257,711.24 61.86% $123,322.48 33.70% $70 042.80 39.09% $20 544.00 68.87% -$1080.00 177.14% -$787,562.35 417.41% -$574,733.07 193.22% $9.682 978.17 64.80% $2,318.49 71.02% $2,800.00 0.00% $5,118.49 52.61% $19,082,010.00 45.45% $766,771.00 0.00% $7,200.00 0.00% $335 882.00 0.00% $20 191 863.00 44.060/o $87,134.00 82.92% $2,173,084.00 59.070/o $1,268,009.00 52.65% $5,387,041.01 44.80% $158,867.30 46.010/o $9 074135.31 51.09% $0.00 0.00% $1000.00 0.00% $47199.16 52.80% $48199.16 52.28% $39 002 294.13 52.59% $20 446.01 59.11% -$30 228.78 $1 094 449.68 50.53% $7 833 863.28 18.78% $1 883 469.95 54.74% $158 617.74 67.99% $49,962 912.01 49.45% Balance 0/o $1354.00 $125,324.62 90.62% $123,308.74 71.11% $156,209.49 26.93% -2,508.56 249.078.17 29.76% 0.00 0.00% 0.00 100.00% 652,766.46 75.54% Exoenditure Category CERTIFIED SALARIES CERTIFIED BENEFITS CLASSIFIED SALARIES CLASSIFIED BENEFITS TOTAL SALARIES \u0026amp; BENEFITS Purchased-Prof/Tech Services Purchased Property Servrces Other Purchased Services Suoolies and Materials Property Other Objects Debt Service Total Other Expenditures OPERATING FUND BUILDING FUND BUILDING FUND PARTNERSH CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND FEDERAL FUND CHILD NUTRITION FUND ACTIVITY FUND TOTAL EXPENDITURES STIMULUS ARRA-Stabilization ARRA-Title I ARRA-IDEA ARRA-IDEA PK ARRA-Homeless ARRA-1003G ARRA-Title I Sch Imprv ARRA-Ed Jobs Fund TOTAL ARRA North Little Rock School District Period 06 - December 2011 Budget Per 06 Actual YTDActual $40,554,724.31 $3,433,707.27 $16,173,575.20 $11,384,084.54 $950,963.28 $4,473,368.72 $12,989,168.00 $1,056,184.11 $5,714,354.96 $4,310,507.00 $375,794.69 $1,872,808.19 $69,238,483.85 $5,816,649.35 $28,234,107.07 $1,456,671.14 $72,821.97 $757,914.50 $3,359,493.70 $66,651.74 $858,573.79 $2,800,531.93 $179,786.73 $2,098,146.95 $5,854,048.80 $214,632.31 $2,778,506.42 $142,990.36 $1,068.12 $31,297.32 $129,553.24 $6,164.44 $71,594.07 $1,748,364.00 $125,850.47 $259,398.41 $15,491,653.17 $666,975.78 $6,855,431.46 $84,730,137.02 $6,483,625.13 $35,089,538.53 $0.00 $0.00 $13,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,661,748.46 $80,917.91 $1,288,917.61 $11,794,986.83 $774,616.93 $3,037,779.36 $4,810,575.00 $421,885.69 $2,226,081.91 $860,966.13 $44,492.90 $253,817.64 $104,858,413.44 $7,805,538.56 $41,909,635.05 Budget Per06 YTD 2,210.00 0.00 0.00 1,229,926.68 159,689.71 $1,210,666.38 340,131.44 73,611.78 303,531.26 59,787.72 o.oo $57,562.51 2,616.47 2,508.56 $2,508.56 1,064,476.52 18,725.81 $111,886.94 o.oo o.oo $0.00 324,309.00 18,662.63 $81,045.94 3,023,457.83 273,198.49 $1,767,201.59 0-2 Available Balance % $24,381,149.11 39.880/o $6,910,715.82 39.290/o $7,274,813.04 43.990/o $2,437,698.81 43.450/o $41,004,376.78 40.780/o $698,756.64 52.030/o $2,500,919.91 25.560/o $702,384.98 74.920/o $3,075,542.38 47.460/o $111,693.04 21.890/o $57,959.17 55.260/o $1,488,965.59 14.840/o $8,636,221.71 44.250/o $49,640,598.49 41.410/o -$13,500.00 $0.00 $1,372,830.85 48.420/o $8,757,207.47 25.750/o $2,584,493.09 46.270/o $607,148.49 29.48% $62,948,778.39 39.970/o Balar:ice 0/o $2,210.00 0.00% $19,260.30 98.43% $36,600.18 89.24% $2,225.21 96.28% $107.91 95.88%. $952,589.58 10.51% $0.00 #DIV/0! $243,263.06 24.99% $1,256,256.24 58.45% NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Board Agenda - January 19, 2012 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL TRANSFERS \u0026amp; CHANGES Karen Pounders From Assistant Principal, Amboy /Pike View Elementary To Interim Principal, Amboy Elementary CERTIFIED PERSONNEL RESIGNATIONS, RETIREMENTS, \u0026amp; TERMINATIONS Emily Clark Melinda Smith Erica Young NLRHS West Campus, Math Teacher Effective 12-16-2011 Pike View Elementary, Fifth Grade Teacher Effective 1-6-2012 Boone Park Elementary, Third Grade Teacher Effective 12-19-2011 NEW CERTIFIED PERSONNEL INFORMATION Name: Proposed Assignment: Licensure: Student Teaching Exp.: Name: Proposed Assignment: Li censure: Teaching Experience: Name: Proposed Assignment: Li censure: Teaching Experience: Jeffrey Claunts Math Teacher, Lakewood Middle 1 Yr. Provisional\nEnglish/Math/Sci/SS 4-8 Lakewood Middle Cheryl Gifford Art Teacher, Poplar Street Middle 5 Yr. Standard\nEng. Lang. Arts 7-12\nArt P-8 \u0026amp; 7-12 Vilonia School District Crystal Savage ALE Teacher, Rose City Middle 5 Yr. Standard\nSpec. Ed. Instructional Spec. P-4 \u0026amp; 4-12 Franklin McKinley School District, San Jose, California CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL RESIGNATIONS, RETIREMENTS AND TERMINATIONS Terraino Adams NLRHS West Campus - Custodian Effective 12-13-11 P-1 CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL RESIGNATIONS, RETIREMENTS AND TERMINATIONS (Continued) Dionna Gould Angela Govan Jacquelyn Beamon Sue Fortner Marie McMillen Robert Reeves Rodnie Shepard Stacey Watson Argenta Academy- Infant/Toddler Worker Effective 1-06-12 Glenview Elementary-Human Service Worker Effective 12-14-11 Lynch Drive Elementary - Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 1-13-12 NLRHS West Campus - Computer Lab Manager Effective 12-16-11 Argenta Academy- Infant/Toddler Worker Effective 1-06-12 NLRSD-Technology Technician Effective 1-19-12 NLRHS East Campus - Custodian Effective 1-03-12 Belwood Elementary - ALE Paraprofessional Effective 12-12-11 CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL TRANSFERS AND CHANGES Jessie Horton Danette Lawson Andrea Shante Linda Bailey From Lynch Drive - Special Education Paraprofessional To Indian Hills - Special Education Paraprofessional From Redwood Early Childhood Center - Secretary To NLRSD Bookkeeping -Bookkeeper From Ridgeroad Middle - Child Nutrition Assistant To Crestwood Elementary - Child Nutrition Assistant NEW CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL Belwood Elementary - ALE Paraprofessional Effective 1-03-12, Salary Schedule lPP, 185 days P-2 Cortney Ervin Samuel Reed Iamaman Rufus Wildflower Smith NEW CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL (Continued) NLRSD Transportation - Bus Driver Effective 12-16-11, Salary Schedule 1 TR, 190 days NLRSD Transportation - Bus Driver Effective 1-20-12, Salary Schedule lTR, 190 days NLRSD West Campus -Child Nutrition Assistant Effective 12-12-11, Salary Schedule lCN, 180 days NLRSD Transportation - Bus Driver Effective 1-20-12, Salary Schedule lTR, 190 days P-3 NORTHL ITTLER OCKS CHOODL ISTRICT January 2012 BIDS FOR APPROVAL BIDN UMBER0: 4-09-136A P lumbingS erviceB id BIDN AME:R epairst o DamagedS ewerL ines SOURCEO F FUNDINGC: apitolO utlay LOCATIONC: entralO ffice HarrellM echanicaCl ontractorsI,n c. BIDN UMBERN~A  Manufacturer $19,916.2..8.. . BIDN AME:E LLT estingM aterials( English2 nd Language)-ADES tateA pprovedL ASL inks K-12A ssessment ClassroomK its SOURCEO F FUNDINGE: LL LOCATIOND: istrictW ide CTB McGraw-Hill BIDN UMBERN: A DFAS tateC ontractB 27158 BIDN AMEA: pple IPADSE ast,P arkH ill SOURCEO F FUNDINGE: LL LOCATIONE: astC ampusP, arkH ill Apple Computer DFA Contract B27158 Didn otm eest pecifications Part of all or no bid Qualityn otr ecommended LimitedC overage Recommended $12,688.1..8.. . $17,431.20- S-1 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 06 (December) FY 2012 Check# CheckDate Vendor# Vendor Amount 161647 12/5/2011 168 AMSTERDAM PRINTING 391.63 161648 12/5/2011 100920 BONNIE CURLIN 57.06 161649 12/5/2011 559 BOUND TO STAY BOUND BOOKS 998.68 161650 12/5/2011 100911 BOUND TO STAY BOUND BOOKS 183.82 161651 12/5/2011 1211 FOLLETT LIBRARY RESOURCES 1,539.07 161652 12/5/2011 1539 HEATHER RHODES-NEWBURN 428.19 161653 12/5/2011 9739 J L HEIN SERVICE INC 1,304.64 161654 12/5/2011 4838 KAREN YOUNTS-KING 45.36 161655 12/5/2011 2473 LAKESHORE LEARNING MATER! 1,020.82 161656 12/5/2011 3853 MEREDITH SHIPMAN 41.49 161657 12/5/2011 101670 MICHAEL CLARK 44.43 161658 12/5/2011 5108 MOEMS 99.00 161659 12/5/2011 8990 NCS PEARSON INC 243.00 161660 12/5/2011 9330 PATRICIA MCMURRAY 96.68 161661 12/5/2011 1421 PERMA BOUND 1,219.11 161662 12/5/2011 2645 SCHOLASTIC TESTING SERVIC 696.37 161663 12/5/2011 38 SCHOOL SPECIAL TY 602.44 161664 12/5/2011 102576 ZAHOUREK SYSTEMS INC 9,212.91 161665 12/5/2011 515 AT\u0026amp;T 10,232.86 161666 12/5/2011 1884 AGQBA QUIZ BOWL 220.00 161668 12/5/2011 3286 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #85 7,788.50 161669 12/5/2011 241 AMERICAN PAPER \u0026amp; TWINE CO 1,317.33 161670 12/5/2011 1114 ARCH FORD EDUCATION SERV. 342.50 161671 12/5/2011 1101 ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT GAZETTE 188.75 161672 12/5/2011 5040 ARKANSAS DEPT OF HEAL TH 75.00 161673 12/5/2011 3006 BARBARA HARTWICK 194.27 161674 12/5/2011 817 BENTON QUIZ BOWL 100.00 161675 12/5/2011 1695 BILL'S LOCK \u0026amp; SAFE 72.09 161676 12/5/2011 568 BROMLEY PARTS \u0026amp; SERVICE 427.44 161677 12/5/2011 573 BROWN JANITOR SUPPLY 1,412.12 161678 12/5/2011 97 C.B.M. GENERAL CONTRACTOR 18,130.00 161679 12/5/2011 9785 CENTERPOINT QUIZ BOWL 60.00 161680 12/5/2011 6170 CENTRAL ST ATES BUS SALES 247.17 161681 12/5/2011 7989 CLE OPERATIONS 312.26 161682 12/5/2011 7042 CLEAR MOUNTAIN REFRESHMEN 10.80 161683 12/5/2011 102492 COCHLEAR AMERICAS 434.60 161684 12/5/2011 6824 CUMMINGS MID SOUTH LLC 2,059.78 161686 12/5/2011 34 DATAMAX OF ARKANSAS 33,438.17 161687 12/5/2011 925 DEMCO 1,967.73 161688 12/5/2011 102160 DEZMON BLAIR 30.00 161689 12/5/201_1 1 10444 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS DIVISIO 6,207.07 161690 12/5/2011 101915 FITNESS FINDERS 209.28 161691 12/5/2011 101128 FLEMING ELECTRIC INC 2,040.04 161692 12/5/2011 432 FOLLETT LIBRARY 17,022.07 161693 12/5/2011 100474 GODDESS PRODUCTS, INC. 727.15 161694 12/5/2011 6710 GOLDEN CORRAL I 1,200.00 161695 12/5/2011 506 GOLDEN WEST INDUSTRIAL SU 863.91 c- 161696 12/5/2011 102614 HARRISON ENERGY PARTNERS 227.25 - 161697 12/5/2011 3290 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICE 104.28 161698 12/5/2011 102531 IMAGE MARKET 701.95 161699 12/5/2011 1721 IMAGES 3,976.56 161700 12/5/2011  1314 INFORMATION VAULTING SERV 147.40 161701 12/5/2011 7446 INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP 8,753.38 161702 12/5/2011 9739 J L HEIN SERVICE INC 20,408.76 Page T-1 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 06 (December) FY 2012 Check# CheckDate Vendor# Vendor Amount 161703 12/5/2011 100513 JBHM EDUCATION GROUP 52,777.78 161704 12/5/2011 2166 JOHN WILEY \u0026amp; SONS 58.62 161705 12/5/2011 102612 KEL DENKER 150.00 161706 12/5/2011 90098 KENNETH A KIRSPEL 500.00 161707 12/5/2011 1715 KOOLVENT ALUM. AWNING CO. 425.00 161708 12/5/2011 1727 KREBS BROS. SUPPLY CO INC 82.63 161709 12/5/2011 101251 KRISTI MANN 196.00 161710 12/5/2011 101648 MAILFINANCE 371.41 161711 12/5/2011 5085 MARDEL#8 1,564.81 161712 12/5/2011 8458 NATIONWIDE BUS PARTS 1,045.98 161713 12/5/2011 4128 OFFICE DEPOT 45.34 161714 12/5/2011 2966 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY 96.35 ,161715 12/5/2011 1849 PCI EDUCATIONAL PUBLISHIN 4,837.88 161716 12/5/2011 10877 PENWORTHY COMPANY 364.29 161717 12/5/2011 101157 PETTIT \u0026amp; PETTIT COUNSUL Tl 1,234.02 161718 12/5/2011 10140 SCHOLASTIC BOOK FAIRS 1,000.84 161719 12/5/2011 452 SOLUTION TREE 62.90 161720 12/5/2011 102590 TAURUS D GREEN 30.00 161721 12/5/2011 9228 THE PRINTING DEPARTMENT I 1,234.89 161722 12/5/2011 2890 TREADWAY ELECTRIC COMPANY 1,679.40 161723 12/5/2011 100844 US ABLE LIFE 242.00 161724 12/5/2011 101354 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE 440.00 161726 12/5/2011 2164 UTILITY BILLING SERVICES 6,981.74 161727! 12/5/2011 8781 WALMART COMMUNITY BRC 3,185.54 161728 12/6/2011 320 ALAN CROWNOVER 189.25 161729 12/6/2011 8350 ARKTESOL 85.00 161730 12/6/2011 8350 ARKTESOL 1,275.00 161731 12/6/2011 8350 ARKTESOL 425.00 161732 12/6/2011 442 BASICS PLUS 2,298.30 161733 12/6/2011 3808 BECKY MATTHEWS 92.23 161734 12/6/2011 539 BILL DUVALL 88.99 161735 12/6/2011 7081 BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY ACT 365.39 161736 12/6/2011 100911 BOUND TO STAY BOUND BOOKS 319.95 161737 12/6/2011 100375 CHERRYDALE FARMS 1,750.13 161738 12/6/2011 101743 CLIFTON ROBINSON 167.92 161739 12/6/2011 1927 EL TRUDIA ADAMS 167.92 161740 12/6/2011 2730 EMBASSY SUITES HOTEL 983.04 161741 12/6/2011 102607 FRESH FACS PUBLISHING 287.50 161742 12/6/2011 3738 JANICE KUCALA 36.45 161743 12/6/2011 2633 JIMMY MAHER 41.79 161744 12/6/2011 3526 JULIE DRAKE 37.88 1'61745 12/6/2011 2085 MICHEAL STONE 159.00 161746 12/6/2011 102555 MONTESSORI SERVICES 20.95 161747 12/6/2011 102564 MURRY'S DINNER PLAYHOUSE 1,140.00 161748 12/6/2011 102615 MYEISHA HAYWOOD 167.92 161749 12/6/2011 8990 NCS PEARSON INC 11,755.80 161750 12/6/2011 10258 PAIGE BANGS 167.92 161751 12/6/2011 9330 PATRICIA MCMURRAY 21.13 161752 12/6/2011 1872 POE TRAVEL 4,988.00 161753 12/6/2011 1769 RAYMOND SMITH 63.13 161754 12/6/2011 101834 RENA TAYLOR 34.59 161755 12/6/2011 10140 SCHOLASTIC BOOK FAIRS 261.94 161756 12/6/2011 240 SCHOOL MATE 330.00 161757 12/6/2011 4954 SHIRLEY BILLINGS 59.40 Page T-2 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 06 (December) FY 2012 Check# CheckDate Vendor# Vendor Amount 161758 12/6/2011 7529 SOUTHWEST AR EDUCATIONAL 180.00 161759 12/6/2011 10083 STEPHANY BARNETTE 1.12 161760 12/6/2011 6572 T-SHIRT SHOP 1,206.90 161761 12/6/2011, 5035 TEACHING RESOURCE CENTER 90.39 161762 12/6/2011 101241 WHITE RIVER SERVICES 283.50 161767 12/6/2011 92851 TURNER DAIRY 23,782.21 161768 12/6/2011 675 CABOT FLORISTS 226.80 161769 12/6/2011 102104 CENTRAL ARKANSAS PAPA MUR 990.00 161770 12/6/2011 580 CENTRAL ST ATES BUS SALES 183.59 161771 12/6/2011 7042 CLEAR MOUNTAIN REFRESHMEN 28.08 161772 12/6/2011 878 COMMUNITY BAKERY 100.73 161773 12/6/2011 101306 CRAIG EDWARDS 165.00 161774 12/6/2011 i 986 FOOTLIGHTS 627.80 161775 12/6/2011 100474 GODDESS PRODUCTS, INC. 158.98 161776 12/6/20111 7446 INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP 3,964.79 161777 12/6/2011 9739 J L HEIN SERVICE INC 5,142.96 161778 12/6/2011 9739 J L HEIN SERVICE INC 13,310.34 161779 12/6/2011 9739 J L HEIN SERVICE INC 6,802.92 161780 12/6/2011 101319 KATHERINE WEILER 74.34 161781 12/6/2011 1727 KREBS BROS. SUPPLY CO INC 111.28 161782 12/6/2011 102478 MAGNESS OIL COMPANY 23,006.94 161783 12/6/2011 102608 MARY ANNE KINCHEN 100.00 161784 12/6/2011 5807 MELISSA FARRAR 21.16 161785 12/6/2011 100712 NANCY L. PRIEST 48.16 161786 12/6/2011 10025 NATIONAL LIFT OF ARKANSAS 561.60 161787 12/6/2011 4128 OFFICE DEPOT 4,063.64 161788 12/6/2011 2329 PROFESSIONAL FORMS \u0026amp; SUPP 232.20 161789 12/6/2011 4122 RICHARD ALEXANDER 85.13 161790 12/6/2011 4122 RICHARD ALEXANDER 187.00 161791 12/6/2011 2600 ROSIE COLEMAN 13.22 161792 12/6/2011 100320 SARA RICHMOND 107.81 161793 12/6/2011 4803 SIGN ZONE 1,022.96 161794 12/6/2011 29 SOURCE4 1,034.27 I-- - 161795 12/6/2011 2009 STUDENT SUPPLY 48.37 161796 12/6/2011 I 92204 TAGGART FOSTER CURRENCE G 9,690.00 161797 12/6/2011 144 TELETOUCH 52.36 161798 12/6/2011 102223 THE CREATIVE COMPANY 579.33 161799 12/6/2011 5469 UNIVERSAL MECHANICAL SERV 1,881.65 161800 12/6/2011 2164 UTILITY BILLING SERVICES 473.43 161801 12/6/2011 8781 WALMART COMMUNITY BRC 7 10.67 161802 12/6/2011 100322 WILLIAM SINGLETON 480.00 161803, 12/7/2011 -f- 568 BROMLEY PARTS \u0026amp; SERVICE 36.28 161804 12/7/2011 2853 CRESTWOOD PTA 27.15 1--6--1~8 051 12/7/2011 100840 ELIZABETH ORTEGA BREWER 1,551.00 161806 12/7/2011 432 FOLLETT LIBRARY 3,460.34 161807 12/7/2011 100474 GODDESS PRODUCTS, INC. 126.95 161808 ~/7/2011_l ____!iOOH. ALBERT PIPE \u0026amp; STEEL CO 16.62 -- 161809 12/7/2011: 100509 KELLY REDDIN 1,452.50 12/7/261'i: LIGHTSPEED TECHNOLOGIES I - - 161810 4935 5,486.56 161811 12/7/2011 4012 LINEAGE 268.92 161812 1 12/7/2011 100387 MELISSA EZZI 2,471.00 161813\n12/7/20-11 - 7220 OCCUPATIONAL HEAL TH CTRS 297.00 161814 12/7/2011 100661 PETTUS OFFICE PRODUCTS 125.27 161815 12/7/2011 2398 SAMS CLUB DIRECT 60.54 Page T-3 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 06 (December) FY 2012 Check# CheckDate Vendor# Vendor Amount 161816 12/7/2011 101577 VERIZON ARENA 2,279.10 161817 12/7/2011 8781 WALMART COMMUNITY BRC 38.72 -1- 161818 12/7/2011 1315 XEROX CORPORATION 996.35 161819 12/7/2011 650 ACHIEVEMENT PRODUCTS 205-.62 161820 12/7/2011 10082 ALICIA YARBROUGH 44.18 161821 12/7/2011 8716 AMANDA STUCKEY 37.93 161822 12/7/2011 4088 AMERICA DIRECT INC 252.00 161823 12/7/2011 102076 AMY CLAXTON --- 65.60 161824 12/7/2011 10075 ANDREA HAIN 19.15 161825 12/7/2011 102577 ARKANSAS BUSINESS FURNITU 322.50 161826 12/7/2011 - 5039 ARKANSAS DEPT OF HEAL TH 200.00 161827 12/7/2011 10074 ASHLEY HANAN ' 11.17 ' 161828 12/7/2011 90021 BRENDA PARKER I 21.84 161829 12/7/2011 4836 CEDRIC BLACK 26.38 161830 12/7/20111 1152 CENTERS FOR YOUTH AND FAM 23,760.00 161831 12/7/2011 10078 CLAUDIA MORAN 73.16 161832 12/7/2011, 7989 CLE OPERATIONS 295.81 161833 121712011: 5381 CYNTHIA LONDON 7.06 161834 12/7/2011 l 925 DEMCO 276.14 161835 12/7/2011- ~I 9424 DENISE WADLEY 14.11 161836 12/7/2011 6741 DIEDRA GASKALLA 87.03 161837 12/7/2011 5878 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY 600.36 161838 12/7/2011 6702 DISCOVERY EDUCATION INC 73.93 161839 12/7/2011 1812 DOROTHY FARRIS 62.41 161840 12/7/2011 92431 ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLIGIE 390.00 161841 12/7/2011 1211-FOLLETT LIBRARY RESOURCES 244.84 161842 12/7/2011 9739 J L HEIN SERVICE INC 33,480.00 161843 12/7/2011 90035 JACQUELINE SUMLER 17.56 161844 12/7/2011 90044 JAMES W WOODARD 61.07 161845 12/7/2011 101715 JAMIE GOEBEL 82.53 161846 12/7/2011 100986 JAN EARP 18.90 161847 12/7/2011 8701 JENNY OBANNON 18.00 161848 12/7/2011 101693 JOAN WORTHEN 19.15 161849 12/7/2011 6052 KAREN POWELL 37.88 161850 12/7/2011 8412 KIDS DIRECTORY LLC ! 500.00 161851 12/7/2011 102505 KIM DIELMANN 76.73 161852 12/7/2011 101065 KIM JOHNSTON 5:29 161853 12/7/2011 8591 KRISTIE RATLIFF 22.29 161854 12/7/2011 2473 LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERI 38.09 161855 12/7,2011 123 LAURA JENNINGS 33.57 161856 12/7/2011 6944 LEANN ALEXANDER 52.37 161857 12/7/2011 101529 LINGUISYSTEMS, INC. 87.90 161858 12/7/2011 101914 LORI BRUSH 10.41 161859 12/7/2011 678 LYNDA SISCO 112.90 161860 12/7/2011 102073 MARTHA NORTON, P.A. ! 315.00 161861 12/7/2011 102608 MARY ANNE KINCHEN 120.00 161862 12/7/2011 102571 MARY HILL 9.49 161863 12/7/2011 4770 MATHEMATICS OLYMPIADS 99.00 161864 12/7/2011 8990 NCS PEARSON INC 2,893.10 161865 12/7/2011 7567 NLR HIGH SCHOOL BAND BOOS 774.50. 161866 12/7/2011 102613 NORMA SPEARMAN 231.00 161867 12/7/2011 101182 NORTH LITTLE ROCK POLICE i 1,631.25 161868 12/7/2011 5421 PESTMASTERSINC : 502.20 161869 12/7/2011 7093 REDWOOD ELEMENTARY ACTIVI i 22.20 Page T-4 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 06 (December) FY 2012 Check# CheckDate Vendor# Vendor Amount 161870 12/7/2011 3154 RHONDA DICKEY 40.38 161871 12/7/2011 102261 SABRA BEARDEN 140.00 161872 12/7/2011 6141 SANDIE LASLEY 30.98 161873 12/7/2011 90102 SANDRA CAMPBELL 21.98 161874 12/7/2011 2491 SCHOOL SPECIAL TY/CLASSROO 234.44 161875 12/7/2011 3227 SCHOOLDUDE.COM 3,183.24 161876 12/7/2011 4854 SHANDA COLEMAN 10.00 161877 12/7/2011 100572 SHARON WOODSON 35.70 161878 12/7/2011 4834 SHERRY HALL 46.87 161879 12/7/2011 10083 STEPHANY BARNETTE 15.71 161880 12/7/2011 9679 SUSAN MILLER 20.62 161881 12/7/2011 101086 TOMMIE CAMPBELL 56.28 161882 12/7/2011 2129 VANDY NASH 116.76 161883 12/7/2011 101847 VICTOR D RODERIQUEZ 255.00 161884 12/7/2011 3123 YOUTH HOME INC 7,020.00 161885 12/9/2011 4314 AEA 466.62 161886 12/9/2011 8476 AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 557.50 161887 12/9/2011 4927 AFLAC 534.30 161888 12/9/2011 6614 AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERV 225.00 161889 12/9/2011 2338 AR PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIR 871.54 161890 12/9/2011 1256 AR TEACHER RETIREMENT RET 1,605.77 161891 12/9/2011 100842 ARKANSAS BLUE CROSS BLUE 3,212.5~ 161892 12/9/2011 1185 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 41,244.68 161893 12/9/2011 1186 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 316.58 161894 12/9/2011 1177 BANK OF THE OZARKS 50,918.31 161895 12/9/2011 9695 CAPITAL ONE BANK 10.00 161896 12/9/2011 1635 CINTAS CORPORATION LOC 57 63.10 161897 12/9/2011 5003 COLONIAL LIFE \u0026amp; ACCIDENT 53.81 161898 12/9/2011 9342 CONSECO LIFE 5.29 161899\n12/9/2011 947 DEPT. OF FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINI 8,336.76 161900 12/9/2011 10444 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS DIVISIO 41,948.61 1619011 12/9/2011 5332 ING RETIREMENT PLANS 240.00 161902 12/9/2011 5000 ING SERVICE CENTER 125.00 1619031 12/9/2011 3260 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 37.50 161904 12/9/2011 8311 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 100.00 161905 12/9/2011 8805 JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN 316.15 161906 12/9/2011 1184 LIFE INSURANCE OF SOUTHWE -~ 2,502.73 161907 12/9/2011 5782 MARKT MCCARTY TRUSTEE 2,223.57 -c- 161908 12/9/2011 2060 NLR EDUCATORS CREDIT UNIO 5,939.74 161909 12/9/2011 5043 NLRSD-BACKGROUND CHECK 239.00- 161910 12/9/2011 516 OCSE 3,323.31 161911 12/9/2011 2634 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GE 269.54 161912 12/9/2011 5474 PIONEER CREDIT RECOVERY I - ,-- 81.10 161913 12/9/2011 102125 PROFESSIONAL CREDIT MANAG 113.48 161914 12/9/2011: 5529 SOUTHERN, ALLEN \u0026amp; WITHRO 248.75 161915 12/9/2011 2202 TASC 269.58 161916 12/9/2011 101735 THE MCHUGHES LAW FIRM LLC 240.16 161917 12/9/2011 9337 US ABLE LIFE -,~.10- 161920 12/9/2011 100846 US ABLE LIFE I 1,026.33 161921 12/9/2011 9340 US ABLE LIFE INSURANCE C i 622.10 161922 12/9/2011 4211 US ABLE LIFE-VOLUNTARY ! 4.93 12/9/2011 U SABLE LIFE/CANCER I - 161923 9345 I 1,792.50 161924 12/9/2011 2927 UNITED WAY OF PULASKI COU I 34.83 161925 12/9/2011 10228 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE OF AM 5.90 Page T-5 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 06 (December) FY 2012 Check# CheckDate Vendor# Vendor Amount 161926 12/9/2011 102502 USABLE VOLUNTARY GROUP L 712.10 161927 12/9/2011 2953 VALIC - VARIABLE ANNUITY 660.00 161928 12/9/2011 100843 VISION SERVICE PLAN (AR) 711.97 161929 12/7/2011 101118 DAVIDSON F HODGES 60.00 161930 12/7/2011 102599 EDNA WHITE 25.00 161931 12/7/2011 6203 GARY L STEPHENS 37.50 161932 12/7/2011 101123 LEMONT M MOORE 25.00 161933 12/7/2011 102618 ROBERTA J WALLACE 37.50 161934 12/7/2011 100446 STACEY WATSON 60.00 161935 12/7/2011 3520 SUNNY MILLER 60.00 161938 12/7/2011 92851 TURNER DAIRY 12,685.57 161939 12/9/2011 1256 AR TEACHER RETIREMENT RET 534.58 161940 12/9/2011 1185 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 15,942.45 161941 12/9/2011 5385 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 10.00 161942 12/9/2011 1186 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 1,208.14 161943 12/9/2011 1177 BANK OF THE OZARKS 16,848.64 161944 12/9/2011 947 DEPT. OF FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINI 2,140.27 161945 12/9/2011 1184 LIFE INSURANCE OF SOUTHWE 119.99 161946 12/12/2011 4568 AMERICAN COMPOSTING INC 257.76 161947 12/12/2011 3545 ANGIE COLCLASURE 35.01 161948 12/12/2011 1497 APPLE COMPUTER INC 6,890.40 161949 12/12/2011 101940 ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CO 771.54 161950 12/12/2011 493 BARNES AND NOBLE 2,149.20 161951 12/12/2011 102621 BEAU CRAWFORD 100.00 161952 12/12/2011 568 BROMLEY PARTS \u0026amp; SERVICE 1,144.34 161953 12/12/2011 5774 CARLEX 224.95 161954 12/12/2011 318 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 61.19 161955 12/12/2011 644 CERTIFIED LABORATORIES 923.40 161956 12/12/2011 1635 CINTAS CORPORATION LOC 57 49.07 161957 12/12/2011 7042 CLEAR MOUNTAIN REFRESHMEN 131.65 161958 12/12/2011 5248 CROW BURLINGAME CO 255.66 161959 12/12/2011 92383 CURRY'S TERMITE \u0026amp; PEST CO 237.60 161960 12/12/2011 10081 DEANN ROACH 35.11 161961 12/12/2011 1219 FLEET TIRE SERVICE OF NLR 32.40 161962 12/12/2011 100474 GODDESS PRODUCTS, INC. 68.03 161963 12/12/2011 2132 GRAINGER 31.04 161964 12/12/2011 101658 HOME TURF INC 5,846.40 161965 12/12/2011 100513 JBHM EDUCATION GROUP 12,500.01 161966 12/12/2011 829 KIM REYNOLDS 182.28 161967 12/12/2011 2233 LAURA WINTERS 25.28 161968 12/12/2011 1988 LITTLE ROCK WINNELSON CO. 274.47 161969 12/12/2011 93165 LOWE'S 788.03 161970 12/12/2011 1465 MCINTIRE ENTERPRISES INC 283.99 161971 12/12/2011 101542 NEGWER DOOR SYSTEMS 529.71 161972 12/12/2011 1117 NORTH LITTLE ROCK ELECTRI 1,057.15 161973 12/12/2011 101233 SEARK 190.00 161974 12/12/2011 5074 SHIFFLER EQUIPMENT SALES 232.57 161975 12/12/2011 1006 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 284.10 161976 12/12/2011 2703 STAR BOLT \u0026amp; SCREW CO INC 184.58 161977 12/12/2011 276 STATE OF ARKANSAS 37,018.00 161978 12/12/2011 1163 SUSAN SHURLEY 27.05 161979 12/12/2011 2164 UTILITY BILLING SERVICES 744.95 161980 12/12/2011 8781 WALMART COMMUNITY BRC 1,946.95 161981 12/13/2011 5889 A \u0026amp; A FIRE \u0026amp; SAFETY COMPA 334.00 Page T-6 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 06 (December) FY 2012 Check# CheckDate Vendor# Vendor Amount 161982 12/13/2011 74 ACE GLASS CONSTRUCTION C 1,036.05 161983 12/13/2011 101855 APSRC 240.00 161984 12/13/2011 6827 ARKANSAS BUSINESS PUBLISH 565.00 161985 12/13/2011 3544 ASHA/AMERICAN SPCH-LANG,H 225.00 161986 12/13/2011 493 BARNES AND NOBLE 7,609.59 161987 12/13/2011 102561 BELLWEATHER MEDIA INC 723.20 161988 12/13/2011 1695 BILL'S LOCK \u0026amp; SAFE 180.63 161989 12/13/2011 555 BOILER INSPECTION DIVISIO 34.00 161990 12/13/2011 102391 BRIAN BROWN 40.00 161991 12/13/2011 102596 CARLOS PACE 85.00 161992 12/13/2011, 101274 CARL TON BATES CO 22.86 161993 12/13/2011 7042 CLEAR MOUNTAIN REFRESHMEN 10.80 161994 12/13/2011 823 COMPLETE COMPUTING 3,205.44 161995 12/13/2011 2007 DEBRA GREENFIELD 11.20 161996 12/13/2011 2514 DIAMOND INTERNATIONAL TRU 30.12 161997 12/13/2011 i 5091 DIAMOND STATE BUS COMPANY 9,471.88 161998 12/13/2011 7265 EASTER SEALS ARKANSAS 350.00 161999 12/13/2011 7265 EASTER SEALS ARKANSAS 1,000.00 162000 12/13/2011 1051 ED'S SUPPLY CO 37.90 162001 12/13/2011 102599 EDNA WHITE 70.00 162002 12/13/2011 2935 EINSTRUCTION CORPORATION 1,646.60 162003 12/13/2011 100771 FLEMING NETWORK SERVICES, 160.00 162004 12/13/2011 100474 GODDESS PRODUCTS, INC. 1,465.89 162005 12/13/2011 8066 GRAYBAR COMPANY INC 150.08 162006 12/13/2011 101976 HASLER 933.12 162007 12/13/2011 8567 HONEYBAKED HAM COMPANY 382.72 162008 12/13/2011 1499 HUM'S HARDWARE 101.51 162009 12/13/2011 7446 INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP 60,462.72 162010 12/13/2011 9739 J L HEIN SERVICE INC 3,751.92 162011 12/13/2011 5044 JAMES T CHRISTOPHER 60.00 162012 12/13/2011 3926 JIMMY E WALKER 60.00 162013 12/13/2011 102050 JUAN WILSON - 20.00 162014 12/13/2011 5162 JUST RIBBONS 65.00 162015 12/13/2011 2735 KESSLERS TEAM SPORTS 1,026.00 t---- 162016 12/13/2011 3601 KNOWLEDGE TREE 260.03 162017 12/13/2011 7080 LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY ACTIV 286.30 162018 12/13/2011 1748 LAKEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL 90.00 162019 12/13/2011 i 5150 LRP PUBLICATIONS DEPT 107 164.40 162020 12/13/2011 i 8117 MARY BETH COX - 80.00 162021 12/13/2011 ! 101666 MELANIE LANDRUM 50.00 162022 12/13/2011 100407 MICHAEL D WILLIAMS I 20.00 162023 12/13/2011 2865 MICKS BARB Q I 540.00 162024 12/13/2011 100551 MONTREL SIMMONS 70.00 162025 12/13/2011 1983 N L R WINTEMP SUPPLY 218.77 162026 12/13/2011 2087 NLR WELDING SUPPLY : 6.32 \u0026gt;--- 162027 12/13/2011 2131 NORTH LITTLE ROCK WIN NELS j 465.71 162028 12/13/20111 4128 OFFICE DEPOT 364.06 162029 12/13/2011 I 2966 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY ! 210.00 162030 12/13/2011 8788 PAR PAK INC 'I 2,605.50 162031 12/13/2011 1 1849 PCI EDUCATIONAL PUBLISHIN 1,772.94 162032 12/13/2011 10877 PENWORTHY COMPANY 148.00 162033 12/13/2011 100661 PETTUS OFFICE PRODUCTS I 117.40 162035 12/13/2011 2742 PPG ARCHITECTURAL FINISHE 424.19 162036 12/13/2011 2407 RAINEY ELECTRONICS 80.25 Page T-7 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 06 (December) FY 2012 Check# CheckDate Vendor# Vendor Amount -- 162037 I 12/13/2011 2398 SAMS CLUB DIRECT 25.14 162038 12/13/2011 10346 SANDERS SUPPLY 71.57 162039 I 12/13/2011 100813 SAVVY KIDS 395.00 162040 12/13/2011 4975 SCHOOL NURSE SUPPLY INC 328.00 1620411 12/13/201-1 2569 SCHOOL SPECIAITY 406.36 162042 12/13/2011 4854 SHANDA COLEMAN 27.05 162043 12/13/2011 102500 SMARTED 9,959.17 162044 12/13/2011 3330 SPRINT 7,216.03 162045 12/13/2011 2698 STANLEY HARDWARE CO 182.03 162046 12/13/2011 606 SUPER DUPER INC 8,441.85 162047 12/13/2011 102223 THE CREATIVE COMPANY 3,243.11 162048 12/13/2011 9228 THE PRINTING DEPARTMENT I 1,234.89 162049 12/13/2011 2890 TREADWAY ELECTRIC COMPANY 841.17 162050 12/13/2011 101354 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE 330.75 162051 12/13/2011 101354 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE 330.75 162052 12/13/2011 101354 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE 330.75 162053 12/13/2011 101354 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE '' 330.75 162054 12/13/2011 1866 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERV I 4,000.00 162055 12/13/2011 92902 USI INC t 87.85 162056 12/13/2011 4646 VICKI STEADMAN\n51.89 162057 12/13/2011 3336 VICTOR ROY 85.00 162058 12/13/2011 2962 VIRGO MFG CORPORATION 1,323.76 162059 12/13/2011 8781 WALMART COMMUNITY BRC 24.83 162060 12/13/2011 101941 WANDA GREEN 44.95 162061 12/13/2011 8159 ZEECRAFT TECH 265.00 162062 12/15/2011 1256 AR TEACHER RETIREMENT RET 448.00 162063 12/15/2011 1185 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 24,067.95 162064 12/15/2011  1186 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 1,512.00 162065 12/15/20111 1177 BANK OF THE OZARKS 24,173.84 162066 12/15/2011 947 DEPT. OF FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINI 1,975.99 162067 12/15/2011 1184 LIFE INSURANCE OF SOUTHWE 18.92 162068 12/15/2011 33 AAEA 118.72 162069 12/15/2011 ' 102377 ACCOUNT CONTROL TECHNLOGY 197.70 162070 12/15/2011 4314 AEA 201.65 162071 12/15/2011 8476 AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 1,482.00 162072 12/15/2011 4927 AFLAC 1,150.48 162073 12/15/2011 6614 AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERV 6,190.00 162074 12/15/2011 1256 AR TEACHER RETIREMENT RET 5,338.48 162075 12/15/2,011 100842 ARKANSAS BLUE CROSS BLUE 22,752.98 162076 12/15/2011 1185 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 350,754.44 162077, 12/15/2011 5385 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 988.22 162078 12/15/2011 1186 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 34,467.45 162079 12/15/2011 10 C.T.A 5,168.54 162080 12/15/2011' 102097 CENTRAL CHILD SUPPORT 376.00 162081 12/15/2011 1635 CINTAS CORPORATION LOC 57 29.41 162082 12/15/2011 5003 COLONIAL LIFE \u0026amp; ACCIDENT 80.65 162083 12/15/2011 9342 CONSECO LIFE 28.75 162084 12/15/2011 5033 DATAPATH ADMINISTRATIVE S 1,045.82 162085 12/15/2011 947 DEPT. OF FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINI 94,012.55 162086 12/15/2011 10444 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS DIVISIO 214,699.81 162087 12/15/2011 2209 FABER AND BRAND LLC 220.34 162088 12/15/2011 4089 FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY 126.00 162089 12/15/2011 102365 GERHAND G LOPEZ 411.42 162091 12/15/2011 5332 ING RETIREMENT PLANS 2,777.50 Page T-8 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 06 (December) FY 2012 Check# Check Date Vendor# Vendor Amount 162092 12/15/2011 5000 ING SERVICE CENTER 100.00 162093 12/15/2011 3260 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 50.00 162094 12/15/2011 8311 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 137.50 162095 12/15/2011 102625 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 475,986.76 162096 12/15/2011 10328 JOSH E MCHUGHES ATTORNEY 151.03 162097 12/15/2011 8805 JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN 2,673.78 162098 12/15/2011 4909 LAW OFFICE OF STEPHEN P L 582.68 162099 12/15/2011 1184 LIFE INSURANCE OF SOUTHWE 3,346.19 162100 12/15/2011 5782 MARKT MCCARTY TRUSTEE I 1,353.20 162101 12/15/2011 100186 MG TRUST COMPANY LLC 5,446.67 162102 12/15/2011 101927 MICHIGAN STATE DISBURSEME 149.41 162103 12/15/2011 100158 NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS INC 147.89 162104 12/15/2011 2060 NLR EDUCATORS CREDIT UNIO 37,922.18 162105 12/15/2011 5043 NLRSD-BACKGROUND CHECK 139.50 --162106 12/15/2011 516 OCSE 3,611.42 162107 12/15/2011 4949 PHEM 96.96 162108 12/15/2011 5474 PIONEER CREDIT RECOVERY I 298.17 162109 12/15/2011 9310 SBG-VM 673.00 162110 12/15/2011 10227 SECURITY BENEFIT GROUP 100.00 162111 12/15/2011 101780 SLGF OF ARKANSAS 83.08 162112 12/15/2011 2202 TASC 14,451.23 162113 12/15/2011 1 101735 THE MCHUGHES LAW FIRM LLC 94.35 162114 12/15/2011 9337 US ABLE LIFE 2,410.21 162115 12/15/2011 100844 US ABLE LIFE ' 15,282.30 162116 12/15/2011 100845 US ABLE LIFE 4,571.47 162117 12/15/2011 100846 US ABLE LIFE 4,534.40 162118 12/15/2011 9340 U SABLE LIFE INSURANCE C 2,141.33 162119 12/15/2011 4211 US ABLE LIFE-VOLUNTARY 35.57 162120 12/15/2011 9345 U SABLE LIFE/CANCER i 7,477.44 162121 12/15/2011 100824 US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATI 212.00 162122 12/15/2011 2927 UNITED WAY OF PULASKI GOU 597.64 162123 12/15/2011 10228 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE OF AM 982.55 162124 12/15/2011 102502 USABLE VOLUNTARY GROUP L 2,899.07 162125 12/15/2011 2953 VALIC - VARIABLE ANNUITY 17,087.00 162126 12/15/2011 2954 VALIC-VARIABLE ANNUITY LI 300.00 162127 12/15/2011 100843 VISION SERVICE PLAN (AR) 3,766.04 162128 12/14/2011 9107 AR SPANISH INTERPRETER TR 490.00 162129 12/14/2011 4040 BANK OF THE OZARKS WCA TR 230,056.64 162130 12/14/2011 102104 CENTRAL ARKANSAS PAPA MUR 1,788.00 162131 12/14/2011 4333 COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES 277.68 162133 12/14/2011 7783 DIRECT SCHOOL SUPPLIES IN 77.35 162134 12/14/2011 102622 E'S BISTRO 900.00 1-- 162135 12/14/2011 100474 GODDESS PRODUCTS, INC. 485.49 162136 12/14/2011 10271 JUST FOR KIDS THERAPY SER 942.50 -- 162137 12/14/2011 10292 PEDIATRIC THERAPY SERVICE 2,070.00 162138 12/14/2011 1421 PERMA BOUND 90.80 162139 12/14/2011 7084 POPLAR STREET MIDDLE ACTI 46.88 -162140 12/14/2011 2446 -REFRIGERATION \u0026amp; ELECTRIC 252.48 162141 12/14/2011 2500 RIVENDELL BEHAVIORAL HLTH 25,415.00 1621421 12/14/2011 2465 SIMPLY THE BEST CATERING 1,139.08 162143 12/14/2011 92950 THE LIBRARY STORE 208.90 162144 12/14/2011 141 UNISOURCE LITTLE ROCK 8,950.50 162145 12/14/2011 100811 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERV 237.60 162146 12/14/2011 8781 WALMART COMMUNITY BRC : 118.45 Page T-9 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 06 (December) FY 2012 Check# CheckDate Vendor# Vendor Amount 162147 12/14/2011 100117 WORLD BOOK INC 5,114.44 162148 12/15/2011 5468 ABC SUPPLY CO INC 181.93 162149 12/15/2011 1970 ADT SECURITY SERVICES INC ' 129.60 162150. 12/15/2011 8733 ARCOM SYSTEMS 125.00 162151 12/15/2011 568 BROMLEY PARTS \u0026amp; SERVICE 70.84 ~ 162152 12/15/2011 573 BROWN JANITOR SUPPLY 278.91 162154: 12/15/2011 92383 CURRY'S TERMITE \u0026amp; PEST CO 1,576.80 162155 12/15/2011 5318 GALAXY FURNITURE 216.00 162156 12/15/2011 1117 NORTH LITTLE ROCK ELECTRI 319.09 162157 12/15/2011 432 FOLLETT LIBRARY 11,816.58 162158 12/15/2011 4128 OFFICE DEPOT 455.05 162159 12/15/2011 1920 SCHOOL HEAL TH CORPORATION 9,244.84 162160 12/16/2011, 1602 COCA-COLA USA 2,577.50 162161 12/16/2011 92028 DATEK, INC 225.40 162162 12/16/2011 1219 FLEET TIRE SERVICE OF NLR 21.72 162163 12/16/2011 1245 GARY HAVER 1,009.80 162164 12/16/2011 1446 HARPER SHEET METAL WORKS 54.00 162165 12/16/2011 3333 KROGER COMPANY/PERSHING 362.47 162166 12/16/2011 3136 NATIONAL SCHOOL BOARDS AS 4,480.00 162167 12/16/2011 102617 SEAN PATRICK CANADY 500.00 162168 12/16/2011 100844 US ABLE LIFE 957.00 162169 12/16/2011 I 100845 US ABLE LIFE 392.50 162171 12/19/2011 1970 ADT SECURITY SERVICES INC 1,514.29 162172 12/19/2011 92061 BLICK ART MATERIALS 545.32 162173 12/19/2011 3916 CAL VIN ANDERSON 70.00 162175 12/19/2011 318 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 25,077.06 162176 12/19/2011 5119 CHEER EXPRESS 112.55 162177 12/19/2011 4552 COUNCIL FOR EXCEPTIONAL C 175.25 162178 12/19/2011 100474 GODDESS PRODUCTS, INC. 838.44 162179 12/19/2011 2132 GRAINGER 136.04 162180 12/19/2011 7292 HOBBY LOBBY 72.55 162181 12/19/2011 9828 HODGES BADGE COMPANY 299.60 162182 12/19/2011 ! 3738 JANICE KUCALA 160.94 162183 12/19/2011 102050 JUAN WILSON 70.00 162184 12/19/2011 101150 KAPCO 109.62 162185 12/19/2011 5242 MARVIN LOVE 70.00 162186 12/19/2011 100408 MICHAEL HATLEY 70.00 162188 1 12/19/2011 1117 NORTH LITTLE ROCK ELECTRI 76,555.53 162189 12/19/2011 4128 OFFICE DEPOT 41.02 1621SJ 12/19/2011 2569 SCHOOL SPECIAITY 173.01 162191 12/19/2011 101110 STACY MOULTRIE 70.00 162192 12/19/2011 102590 TAURUS D GREEN 70.00 162193 12/19/2011 2164 UTILITY BILLING SERVICES 704.74 162194 12/19/2011 5504 WEST MUSIC COMPANY 382.00 162195 12/22/2011 4314 AEA 475.44 162196 12/22/2011 8476 AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 557.50 162197 12/22/2011 4927 AFLAC 511.55 162198 12/22/2011 6614 AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERV 250.00 162199 12/22/2011 2338 AR PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIR 944.24 162200 12/22/2011 1256 AR TEACHER RETIREMENT RET 1,894.42 162201 12/22/2011 I 100842 ARKANSAS BLUE CROSS BLUE 3,200.29 162202 12/22/2011 1185 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 46,069.42 162203 12/22/2011 1186 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 308.16 162204 12/22/2011 9695 CAPITAL ONE BANK 10.00 Page T-10 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 06 (December) FY 2012 Check# CheckDate Vendor# Vendor Amount 162205 12/22/2011 1635 CINTAS CORPORATION LOC 57 63.10 162206 12/22/2011 5003 COLONIAL LIFE \u0026amp; ACCIDENT 53.81 162207 12/22/2011 9342 CONSECO LIFE 5.29 162208 12/22/2011 947 DEPT. OF FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINI 9,564.12 162209 12/22/2011 10444 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS DIVISIO 41,125.92 162210 12/22/2011 8829 HOSTO \u0026amp; BUCHAN PLLC 94.45 162211 12/22/2011 5332 ING RETIREMENT PLANS 240.00 162212 12/22/2011 5000 ING SERVICE CENTER 125.00 162213 12/22/2011 3260 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 37.50 162214 12/22/2011 8311 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 100.00 162215 12/22/2011 102625 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 56,231.43 162216 12/22/2011 8805 JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN 316.15 162217 12/22/2011 1184 LIFE INSURANCE OF SOUTHWE 3,593.90 162218 12/22/2011 5782 MARKT MCCARTY TRUSTEE 2,223.57 162219 12/22/2011 2060 NLR EDUCATORS CREDIT UNIO 5,386.74 162220 12/22/2011 5043 NLRSD-BACKGROUND CHECK 214.00 162221 12/22/2011 516 OCSE 3,291.27 162222 12/22/2011 2634 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GE 269.54 162223 12/22/2011 5474 PIONEER CREDIT RECOVERY I 89.46 162224 12/22/2011 102125 PROFESSIONAL CREDIT MANAG 125.67 162225 12/22/2011 5529 SOUTHERN, ALLEN \u0026amp; WITHRO 271.43 162226 12/22/2011 2202 TASC 269.58 162227 12/22/2011 101735 THE MCHUGHES LAW FIRM LLC 240.16 162228 12/22/2011 9337 US ABLE LIFE 446.83 162230 12/22/2011 100845 US ABLE LIFE 564.14 162231 12/22/2011 100846 US ABLE LIFE 1,002.09 162232 12/22/2011 9340 U SABLE LIFE INSURANCE C 598.83 162233 12/22/2011 4211 US ABLE LIFE-VOLUNTARY 4.93 162234 12/22/2011 9345 US ABLE LIFE/CANCER 1,759.06 162235 12/22/2011 2927 UNITED WAY OF PULASKI COU 32.33 ,--1- 62236 12/22/2011 10228 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE OF AM 5.90 162237 12/22/2011 102502 USABLE VOLUNTARY GROUP L 702.93 162238 12/22/2011 2953 VALIC - VARIABLE ANNUITY 660.00 162239 12/22/2011 100843 VISION SERVICE PLAN (AR) 695.05 f------- e--- 162240 12/21/2011 101794 A 1 RECOVERY TOWING \u0026amp; REC 109.60 162241 12/21/2011 9726 ADVANCED CABLING SYSTEMS 324.00 162242 12/21/2011 320 ALAN CROWNOVER 236.47 162243 12/21/2011 9846 ALISHA HERRING 86.94 162244 12/21/2011 102604 ANDREA STRUBE 58.38 162245 12/21/2011 7978 ANDRIA SMITH 137.76 162246 12/21/2011 3545 ANGIE COLCLASURE 8.91 162247 12/21/2011 i 9107 AR SPANISH INTERPRETER TR 149.14 162248 12/21/2011 4011 ARKANSAS AIR FRAGRANCE CO 38.88 162249 12/21/2011 1 9649 ARROW PLUMBING INC 2,690.00_ 162250 12/21/2011 3006 BARBARA HARTWICK 298.31 162251 12/21/2011 481 BEST BUY 422.16 162252 12/21/2011 102446 BETHANY MOSLEY 125.58 162253 12/21/2011 10511 BRANDY NESSELRODT 87.78 162254 12/21/2011 6201 BRAY SHEET METAL COMPANY 38.70 162255 12/21/2011 3226 BROOKE BRICKER 131.04 162256 12/21/2011 675 CABOT FLORISTS 38.09 .--1-62257 ,--1-2/21/2011 580 CENTRAL STATES BUS SALES 471.63- 162258 12/21/2011 3032 CHARLES M ROZZELL 400.00 162259 12/21/2011 7042 CLEAR MOUNTAIN REFRESHMEN 91.93 Page T-11 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 06 (December) FY 2012 Check# CheckDate Vendor# Vendor Amount 162260 12/21/2011 4333 COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES 5,678.40 162261 12/21/2011 1602 COCA-COLA USA 2,268.20 162262 12/21/2011 101306 CRAIG EDWARDS 110.00 162263 12/21/2011 5248 CROW BURLINGAME CO 352.56 162264 12/21/2011 92383 CURRY'S TERMITE \u0026amp; PEST CO 550.80 162265 12/21/2011 102447 DAN FEIGELSON 5,400.00 162266 12/21/2011 2514 DIAMOND INTERNATIONAL TRU 3,044.76 162267 12/21/2011 101705 DISCOUNT AUTO GLASS 459.00 162268 12/21/2011 62 DONNA ANDERSON 42.36 162269 12/21/2011 8878 EAST INITATIVE 25.00 162270 12/21/2011 100840 ELIZABETH ORTEGA BREWER 1,864.50 162271 12/21/2011 102245 FUELMAN 375.15 162272 12/21/2011 100764 GCR NORTH LITTLE ROCK TIR 5,729.91 162273 12/21/2011 100474 GODDESS PRODUCTS, INC. 1,124.07 162274 12/21/2011 6710 GOLDEN CORRAL 133.00 162275 12/21/2011 7292 HOBBY LOBBY 69.04 162276 12/21/2011 102603 HUDSON, CISNE \u0026amp; CO.LLP 3,000.00 162277 12/21/2011 1499 HUM'S HARDWARE 14.59 162278 12/21/2011 101553 IB SOURCE ' 1,270.00 162279 12/21/2011 7446 INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP 3,525.12 162280 12/21/2011 1568 INTERSTATE BRANDS 3,810.66 162281 12/21/2011 4923 J \u0026amp; B SUPPLY COMPANY 302.40 162282 12/21/2011 10072 KAREN COLEMAN 25.80 162283 12/21/2011 93165 LOWE'S 221.53 162284 12/21/2011 101885 ME METAL BUILDINGS 1,290.00 162285 12/21/2011 8913 MID SOUTH SALES 3,820.01 162286 12/21/2011 4819 MID-ARK ROOFING INC 390.00 162287 12/21/2011 101813 MITCHELL WIILIAMS, P.L.L. 241.70 162288 12/21/2011 8718 MITCHS TIRE SERVICE 695.00 162289 12/21/2011 1983 N L R WINTEMP SUPPLY 92.59 162290 12/21/2011 100712 NANCY L. PRIEST 43.27 162291 12/21/2011 102627 NETCHEMIA 3,400.00 162292 12/21/2011 2087 NLR WELDING SUPPLY 112.00 162293 12/21/2011 1117 NORTH LITTLE ROCK ELECTRI 910.15 162294 12/21/2011 2136 NORTH LITTLE ROCK POSTMAS : 88.00 162295 12/21/2011 2131 NORTH LITTLE ROCK WINNELS 562.09 162296 12/21/2011 2165 NORTHSIDE SALES CO 151.20 162297 12/21/2011 4128 OFFICE DEPOT 537.24 162298 12/21/2011 6288 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC 6,094.44 162299 12/21/2011 1849 PCI EDUCATIONAL PUBLISHIN 99.95 162300 12/21/2011 100661 PETTUS OFFICE PRODUCTS 178.62 162301 12/21/2011 4094 PHYLLIS MCDONALD 53.76 162302 12/21/2011 102616 PRO CHEM INC 360.51 162303 12/21/2011 2446 REFRIGERATION \u0026amp; ELECTRIC 428.76 162304 12/21/2011 2398 SAMS CLUB DIRECT 1,262.01 162305 12/21/2011 101723 SCHOOL UNIFORMS 1,527.12 162306 12/21/2011 1386 SIMPLEXGRINNELL LP 980.64 162307 12/21/2011 2698 STANLEY HARDWARE CO 16.54 162308 12/21/2011 100427 STERICYCLE INC 518.57 162309 12/21/2011 101752 STOCK BUILDING SUPPLY 175.62 162310 12/21/2011 2970 SYSCO FOOD SERVICE OF ARK 16,950.00 162311 12/21/2011 10456 TANKERSLEY FOODSERVICE 5,398.76 162312 12/21/2011 760 THE COLLEGE BOARD 325.00 162313 12/21/2011 4691 THERAPY PROVIDERS PA 1,500.00 Page T-12 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 06 (December) FY 2012 Check# CheckDate Vendor# Vendor Amount 162314 12/21/2011 2890 TREADWAY ELECTRIC COMPANY 542.54 162315 12/21/2011 2938 UAMS 28,382.42 162316 12/21/2011 8781 WALMART COMMUNITY BRC 1,498.44 162317 12/21/2011 100117 WORLD BOOK INC 1,379.35 162318 12/21/2011 102632 AMERICAN NATIONAL LIFE IN 3,784.51 162319 12/21/2011: 102577 ARKANSAS BUSINESS FURNITU 322.50 162320 12/21/2011 100509 KELLY REDDIN 1,207.50 162321 12/21/2011 6475 LINDSEYS HOSPITALITY HOUS 186.50 162322 12/21/2011 82 MADELYN LAND 59.18 162323 12/21/2011 100387 MELISSA Elli 884.00 162324 12/21/2011 102633 OHIO STATE LIFE/AMERIGO 50.00 162325 12/21/2011 8781 WALMART COMMUNITY BRC 366.85 162326 12/22/2011 8850 A'TEST CONSULTANTS INC 94.00 162327 12/22/2011 3641 AMANDA TIPTON 17.14 162328 12/22/2011 102486 ANNEMARIE MCGAHAGAN 154.98 162329 12/22/2011 92061 BLICK ART MATERIALS 20.80 162330 12/22/2011 102495 CASCIO 1,215.20 162331 12/22/2011 102445 CASEY THOMAS 94.92 162332 12/22/2011 4740 DARLENE HOLMES 90.54 162333 12/22/2011 7364 DAWNE CARROLL I 56.28 162334 12/22/2011 101608 DEBBIE ROPER BRYAN 175.14 162335 12/22/2011 100418 DOLLIE JACKSON 673.00 162336 12/22/2011 1812 DOROTHY FARRIS 23.73 162337 12/22/2011 7265 EASTER SEALS ARKANSAS 1,700.00 162338 12/22/2011 1040 ECOLAB INC 1,788.80 162339 12/22/2011 1143 GTM SPORTSWEAR 509~76 162340 12/22/2011 4592 HANCOCK FABRICS #25 83.58 162341 12/22/2011 3302 HOLLY MOORE ~71 162342 12/22/2011 101715 JAMIE GOEBEL --~-! 56.83 162343 12/22/2011 102444 JANNA KERR 168.84 162344 12/22/2011 754 JENNIFER KIMBRELL 36.46 162345 12/22/2011 4438 KATE SLAY 108.78 162346 12/22/2011 101319 KATHERINE WEILER 49.98 162347 12/22/2011 101179 KEVIN DAVIS 73.50 162348 12/22/2011 102581 KIM DIELMANN I 28.73 162349 12/22/2011 7977 KIM PEARSON - 140.28 162350 12/22/2011 3202 LAUREN WALKER 144.48 f-- 162351 12/22/2011 102609 LEARNING FORWARD 149.00 162352 12/22/2011 100883 LESLIE EASON 139.44 162353 12/22/2011 100345 LINDA ED\\f.'ARDS I 41.58 162354 12/22/2011 981 MAGAZINE SUBSCSRIPTIONS 495.52 162355 12/22/2011 6764 MARCIA CHAPPLE-DEAN 214.20 162356 12/22/2011 10307 MARIBEL SIEMS 29.40 162357 12/22/2011 100165 MEGAN WILSON I 35.87 162358 121221201l 100165 MEGAN WILSON 721.92 162359 12/22/2011 7427 METROPOLITAN EMERGENCY ME 1,520.00 162360 12/22/2011 101181 MICHELE TRETTER 96.60 162361 12/22/2011 6613 NANCY STEWART 107.10 162362 12/22/2011 941 NATHAN CLAYBORN 673.00 162363 12/22/2011 101182 NORTH LITTLE ROCK POLICE 468.21 162364 12/22/2011 2154 NORTH LITTLE ROCK TROPHY 62.10 162365 12/22/2011 101288 OLA PERRY 176.82 162366 12/22/2011 102624 REGINA DOYNE 27.95 1623671 12/22/2011 7152 RHONDA BANKS ! 21.00 Page T-13 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 06 (December) FY 2012 Check# CheckDate Vendor# Vendor Amount 162368 12/22/2011 10675 ROBIN LEE FRAZIER 39.48 162369 12/22/2011 102629 ROBIN TIBBS 4.83 162370 12/22/2011 10470 RUBA AL-SERHAN 7.88 162371 12/22/2011 4462 SARAH CHILDERS 219.66 162372 12/22/2011 38 SCHOOL SPECIAL TY 91.52 162373 12/22/2011 4834 SHERRY HALL 61.82 162374 12/22/2011 8286 SHRED-IT 97.50 162375 12/22/2011 10083 STEPHANY BARNETTE I 20.24 162376 12/22/2011 102560 SUSAN HUMBRECHT 159.18 162377 12/22/2011 1655 SUSAN MATTHEWS 34.44 162378 12/22/2011 101704 TABITHA ROSEBERRY 169.26 162379 12/22/2011 9228 THE PRINTING DEPARTMENT I 1,234.89 162380 12/22/2011 5030 VARITRONICS 591.23 162381 12/22/2011 8850 A'TEST CONSULTANTS INC 94.00 162382 12/22/2011 1905 AAA AUDIO METRICS/MEDICAL 55.00 162383 12/22/2011 33 MEA 95.00 162384 12/22/2011 102253 ADVANCED SPEECH THERAPY L 2,040.00 162385 12/22/2011 102076 AMY CLAXTON I 43.03 162386 12/22/2011 100123 ARKANSAS CHILDRENS HOSPIT 12,925.00 162387 12/22/2011 i 340 ARKANSAS SCHOOL BOARDS AS 100.00 162388 12/22/2011 i 4046 BLUE BELL CREAMERIES L.P. 2,266.06 162389 12/22/2011 t 100920 BONNIE CURLIN 37.95 162390 12/22/2011 90021 BRENDA PARKER 6.47 162391 12/22/2011 102391 BRIAN BROWN 199.50 162392 12/22/2011 6478 CITY OF LITTLE ROCK 15.00 162393 12/22/2011 5381 CYNTHIA LONDON 6.17 162394 12/22/2011 3422 DAMARIS PURTLE 100.80 162395 12/22/2011 5692 ECONOMICS ARKANSAS 300.00 162396 12/22/2011 102237 HENDERSON STATE UNIVERSIT 20.00 162397 12/22/2011 8701 JENNY OBANNON 20.03 162398 12/22/2011 2642 JUNIOR LIBRARY GUILD 574.20 162399 12/22/2011 6052 KAREN POWELL 28.94 162400 12/22/2011 1714 KAYLORS INCORPORATED 89.98 162401 12/22/2011 1748 LAKEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL  260.00 162402 12/22/2011 101914 LORI BRUSH 7.43 162403 12/22/2011 92473 M J COMMUNICATIONS 265.78 162404 12/22/2011 1780 MARLA GLADWIN .6.55 162405 12/22/2011 6414 MUSEUM OF DISCOVERY 250.00 162406 12/22/2011 2420 NEWPORT TV 2,900.00 162407 12/22/2011 101182 NORTH LITTLE ROCK PCLICE 435.00 162408 12/22/2011 9330 PATRICIA MCMURRAY 99.96 162409 12/22/2011 1421 PERMABOUND 1,699.24 162410 12/22/2011 2381 PFG LITTLE ROCK 41,172.87 162411 12/22/2011 1872 POE TRAVEL 404.80 162412 12/22/2011 2331 PSAT/NMSQT 1,540.00 162413 12/22/2011 423 RICHARD WOODS 142.80 162414 12/22/2011 100320 SARA RICHMOND 108.73 162415 12/22/2011 90079 SHARON ELDRED 40.49 162416 12/22/2011 2009 STUDENT SUPPLY 409.10 162417 12/22/2011 9679 SUSAN MILLER 17.:14 162418 12/22/2011 9228 THE PRINTING DEPARTMENT I 1,234.89 162419 12/22/2011 101832 THE TIMES 27.00 162420 12/22/2011 4926 U S FOODSERVICE 17,393.56 162421 12/22/2011 9398 UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN 35,555.00 Page T-14 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 06 (December) FY 2012 Check# Check Date Vendor# Vendor Amount 162422 12/22/2011 3096 WEEKLY READER 338.40 162423 12/22/2011 1497 APPLE COMPUTER INC 48,835.33 162424 12/22/2011 1101 ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT GAZETTE 28,017.00 162425 12/22/2011 657 BENE KEITH 107.36 162426 12/22/2011 100090 BEVERAGE CONCEPTS 2,310.00 162427 12/22/2011 7042 CLEAR MOUNTAIN REFRESHMEN 38.37 162428 12/22/2011 102631 CMI EDUCATION INSTITUTE 759.96 162429 12/22/2011 761 COLLEGE BOARD PUBLICATION 325.00 162430 12/22/2011 ! 2549 DIANE'S GOURMET LUXURIES i 59.12 162431. 12/22/2011 7073 EAST CAMPUS ACTIVITY FUND 630.36 162432 12/22/2011 ' 7265 EASTER SEALS ARKANSAS i 1,000.00 162433 12/22/2011 4099 ETA CUISENAIRE 108.47 162434 12/22/2011 4545 FOLLETT SOFTWARE COMPANY 57,731.00 162435 12/22/2011 6710 GOLDEN CORRAL 600.00 162436 12/22/2011 3735 GREEK4 LIFE 606.42 162437 12/22/2011 I 7446 INTEGRATION SERVICES CORP 1,262.52 162438 12/22/2011 4984 JARIUS COPELAND 27.22 - 162439 12/22/2011 2967 JENKINS ENTERPRISES 753.30 162440 12/22/2011 3854 JOHN HAYNIE 69.69 162441 12/22/201 f ~591 KRISTIE RATLIFF 51.55 162442 12/22/2011 1748 LAKEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL 116.50 162443 12/22/2011 7083 LYNCH DRIVE ELEM ACTIVITY t 330.34 -- 162444 12/22/2011 102073 MARTHA NORTON, P. A. 472.50 162445 12/22/2011 102613 NORMA SPEARMAN 309.75 162446 12/22/2011 2154 NORTH LITTLE ROCK TROPHY I I 1,540.00 162447 12/22/2011 9330 PATRICIA MCMURRAY 56.28 162448 12/22/2011 100661 PETTUS OFFICE PRODUCTS 64.70 162449 12/22/2011 5010 PINNACLE POINTE HOSPITAL 21,125.00 162450 12/22/2011 6240 POSITIVE PROMOTIONS 536.53 - 162451 12/22/2011 2600 ROSIE COLEMAN 46.75 162452 12/22/2011 2398 SAMS CLUB DIRECT I 350.99 162453 12/22/2011 2423 SCANTRON CORPORATION 423.00 162454 12/22/2011 2555 SCHOLASTIC MAGAZINES 155.10 162455 12/22/2011 8781 WALMART COMMUNITY BRC 357.62 162456 12/22/2011 894 WINSTON TURNER 449.40 162457 12/30/2011 33 AAEA 118.72 162458 12/30/2011 102377 ACCOUNT C--O--NTROL TECHNLOGY 197.70 162459 12/30/2011 4314 AEA 196.20 162460 12/30/2011 ! 8476 AEA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 1,482.00 162461 12/30/2011 I 4927 AFLAC 1,150.48 162462 12/30/2011 102632 AMERICAN NATIONAL LIFE IN 3,811.36 162463 12/30/2011 6614 AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERV 6,190.00 162464 12/30/2011- 1256 AR TEACHER RETIREMENT RET 5,387.83 162465, 12/30/2011 100842 ARKANSAS BLUE CROSS BLUE 22,576.30 162466 12/30/2011 ~ 1185 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 350,652.92 162467 12/30/2011 5385 ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREME 988.22 162468 12/30/201 r 1186 .ARKANSAS TEACHER RETI REME ' 34,674.50 162469 12/30/201!_ 10 C.T.A 5,068.18 162470 12/30/2011 102097 CENTRAL CHILD SUPPORT 376.00 162471 12/30/2011 1635 CINTAS CORPORATION LOC 57 29.41 162472 12/30/2011 5003 COLONIAL LIFE \u0026amp; ACCIDENT I 80.65 162473 12/30/2011 9342 CONSECO LIFE 28.75 162474 _12/~/2011 j 5033 DATAPATH ADMINISTRATIVE S 754.16 --- 162475 12/30/2011 9471DEPT. OF FINANCE \u0026amp; ADMINI 93,955.49 Page T-15 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 06 (December) FY 2012 Check# Check Date Vendor# Vendor Amount 162476 12/30/2011 10444 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS DIVISIO 212,181.23 162477 12/30/2011 2209 FABER AND BRAND LLC 220.34 162478 12/30/2011 4089 FAMILY SUPPORT REGISTRY 126.00 162479 12/30/2011 102365 GERHAND G LOPEZ 411.42 162481 12/30/2011 5000 ING SERVICE CENTER 100.00 162482 12/30/2011 3260 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 50.00 162483 12/30/2011 8311 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 137.50 162484 12/30/2011 102625 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 473,782.17 162485 12/30/2011 10328 JOSH E MCHUGHES ATTORNEY 151.03 162486 12/30/2011 8805 JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN 2,673.78 162488 12/30/2011 1184 LIFE INSURANCE OF SOUTHWE 4,866.73 162489 12/30/2011 5782 MARKT MCCARTY TRUSTEE 1,353.20 162490 12/30/2011 100186 MG TRUST COMPANY LLC 5,571.67 162491 12/30/2011 101927 MICHIGAN STATE DISBURSEME 110.53 162492 12/30/2011 100158 NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS INC 147.89 162493 12/30/2011 2060 NLR EDUCATORS CREDIT UNIO 38,712.18 162494 12/30/2011 5043 NLRSD-BACKGROUND CHECK 123.75 162495 12/30/2011 516 OCSE 3,611.42 162496 12/30/2011 102633 OHIO STATE LIFE/AMERIGO 50.00 162497 12/30/2011 4949 PHEAA 96.96 162498 12/30/2011 5474 PIONEER CREDIT RECOVERY I 352.81 162499 12/30/2011 102634 RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE 2,777.50 162500 12/30/2011 9310 SBG-VAA 673.00 162501 12/30/2011 10227 SECURITY BENEFIT GROUP 100.00 162502 I 12/30/2011 101780 SLGF OF ARKANSAS 83.08 162503 12/30/2011 2202 TASC 14,436.23 162504 1 12/30/2011 101735 THE MCHUGHES LAW FIRM LLC 120.22 162505 12/30/2011 9337 US ABLE LIFE 2,393.07 162506 12/30/2011 100844 US ABLE LIFE 15,167.90 162507 12/30/2011 100845 US ABLE LIFE 4,529.66 162508 12/30/2011 100846 US ABLE LIFE 4,496.94 162509 12/30/2011 9340 U SABLE LIFE INSURANCE C 2,148.81 162510 12/30/2011 4211 US ABLE LIFE-VOLUNTARY 35.57 162511 12/30/2011 9345 U S ABLE LIFE/CANCER 7,412.69 162512 12/30/2011 100824 US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATI 248.43 162513 12/30/2011 2927 UNITED WAY OF PULASKI COU 595.14 162514 12/30/2011 10228 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE OF AM 970.70 162515 12/30/2011 102502 USABLE VOLUNTARY GROUP L 2,868.97 162516 12/30/2011 2953 VALIC - VARIABLE ANNUITY 17,087.00 162517 12/30/2011 2954 VALIC-VARIABLE ANNUITY LI 300.00 162518 12/30/2011 100843 VISION SERVICE PLAN (AR) 3,732.89 162519 12/29/2011 101484 ADAMS PRODUCE COMPANY INC 10,279.40 162520 12/29/2011 102076 AMY CLAXTON 3.00 162521 12/29/2011 1695 BILL'S LOCK \u0026amp; SAFE 100.98 162522 12/29/2011 398 COMCAST 205.74 162523 12/29/2011 942 DFA-SALES \u0026amp; USE TAX i 1,052.00 162524 12/29/2011 1219 FLEET TIRE SERVICE OF NLR 13.51 162525 12/29/2011 101128 FLEMING ELECTRIC INC 444.00 162526 12/29/2011 1296 GLOVERS TRUCK PARTS \u0026amp; EQU 1,398.60 162527 12/29/2011 1499 HUM'S HARDWARE I 12.63 162528 12/29/2011 1699 KEELING COMPANY . 9.91 162529 12/29/2011 123 LAURA JENNINGS I I 37.38 162530 12/29/2011 93165 LOWE'S 120.52 162531 12/29/2011 4946 MARSHA SATTERFIELD 145.37 Page T-16 North Little Rock School District Check Listing for Period 06 (December) FY 2012 Check# Check Date Vendor# Vendor Amount 162532 12/29/2011 1983 N LR WINTEMP SUPPLY 119.12 162533 12/29/2011 101542 NEGWER DOOR SYSTEMS 137.50 162534 12/29/2011 2131 NORTH LITTLE ROCK WINN ELS 24.86 162535 12/29/2011 2381 PFG LITTLE ROCK 0.49 162536 12/29/2011 2698 ST AN LEY HARDWARE CO 112.03 162537 12/29/2011 2703 STAR BOLT \u0026amp; SCREW CO INC 35.02 - 162538 12/29/2011 2890 TREADWAY ELECTRIC COMPANY 15.71 162539 12/29/2011 4926 U S FOODSERVICE 630.00 162540 12/29/2011 8781 WALMART COMMUNITY BRC 35.02 I Grand Total: I 4,725,892.95 Page T-17 BOARD OF EDUCATION MEETING AGENDA ass North Little Rock School District Thursday, February 16, 2012 5:30 P.M. NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT AGENDA REGULAR MEETING - BOARD OF EDUCATION Administration Building, 2700 Poplar Street North Little Rock, Arkansas 72115 Thursday, January 19, 2012 - 5:30 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENTS I. CALL TO ORDER, Dorothy Williams, President II. INVOCATION, Jake Phillips, Lakewood Elementary School Fourth Grader, Son of Tammy and Jerry Phillips III. FLAG SALUTE IV. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Dorothy Williams, President Scott Teague, Vice President J.T. Zakrzewski, Secretary Darrell Montgomery, Disbursing Officer John Riley, Parliamentarian Scott A. Miller, Member Ron Treat, Member V. RECOGNITION OF PEOPLE/EVENTS/PROGRAMS A. Superintendent's Honor Roll - S. Brazear 1. Wes Havens and Luke King, Vote Yes Committee B. Special Recognition - S. Brazear I. CJ Haney- National JAG Award 2. Presentation by NLRHS East Campus EAST Initiative students C. New Partners in Education - S. Brazear 1. Judge Rita Bailey and Ridgeroad Middle Charter 2. Alliance Bible Church and Amboy Elementary Page 2 - Board Agenda February 16, 2012 VI. DISPOSITION OF MINUTES OF PRIOR MEETINGS A. Thursday, January 19, 2012 - 5:30 P.M. (Regular) -Page A- 1 VII. ACTION ITEMS - NEW BUSINESS A. Consider Certified Personnel Policies Committee Report - M. Thomas B. Consider Classified Personnel Policies Committee Report -J. Ward C. Consider Technology Committee Plan Approval - J. Dowdy D. Consider Fiscal Distress Improvement Reports - D. Drennan 1. Detailed Statement of Changes in Fund Balances - Page K - l 2. Summary Revenue Status Report - Page L - 1 3. Summary Expenditure Status Report- Page M- 1 4. Bank Reconciliation Report - Page N - l E. Consider Motion for Consent Agenda - K. Kirspel 1. Consider monthly financial report - Page O - l 2. Consider employment of personnel - Page P - 1 3. Consider bid items - Page S - l 4. Consider payment of regular bills - Page T - 1 VIII. INFORMATIONAL ITEM A. Presentation from Dr. Jeff Walker, University of Arkansas at Little Rock Department of Criminal Justice IX. CALENDAR OF EVENTS A. Professional Development Day (No Students) - Friday, February 17, 2012 B. Parent Conference Day (No Students) - Monday, February 20, 2012 C. Next Board (Regular) Meeting-Thursday, March 15, 2012 - 5:30 p.m. Administration Office Board Room X. STUDENT EXPULSIONS XI. ADJOURNMENT NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of the Superintendent REGULAR MEETING, BOARD OF EDUCATION MINUTES January 19, 2012 The North Little Rock School District Board met in regular session on Thursday, January 19, 2012, in the Board Room of the Administration Building of the North Little Rock School District, 2700 Poplar Street, North Little Rock, Arkansas. Mary Jones, NLR patron, spoke to the Board about adding African-American History to our curriculum. President Dorothy Williams called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. Kennedy Banks, Glenview Elementary Fourth Grader, gave the invocation and led the flag salute. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Present Dorothy Williams, President J. T. Zakrzewski, Secretary Darrell Montgomery, Disbursing Officer John Riley, Parliamentarian Ron Treat, Member Absent Scott Teague, Vice President Scott A. Miller, Member Others Present Mr. Ken Kirspel, Superintendent\nBobby Acklin, Assistant Superintendent\nDenise Drennan, Chief Financial Officer\nRosie Coleman, Administrative Director for Elementary Education\nRhonda Dickey, Administrative Director for Secondary Education\nGreg Daniels, Administrative Director of Information Services\nSusan Shurley, Administrative Director for Special Services\nGregg Thompson, Administrative Director of Human Resources\nadditional staff members and Darlene Holmes, Superintendent's secretary, were also present. Billy Duvall (audio) recorded the meeting. RECOGNITION OF PEOPLE/EVE TS/PROGRAMS Shara Brazear, Communication Specialist, presented two new members of the Superintendent's Honor Roll as Juanita Mattocks, Seventh Street Elementary custodian, and Marie Pierce, NLRHS East Campus. Both were nominated by their principals, Pam Wilcox and Lee Tackett respectively. Ron Treat and Darrell Montgomery presented them with plaques and gift bags. Three principals and their staffs were recognized by the Board for their being among the 20 Most Improved Elementary Schools in Arkansas on the Benchmark Literacy Achievement in 2010 - 2011. The principals were Dana Snowden from North Heights Elementary, Phyllis McDonald from Lynch Drive Elementary, and A-1 Allen Pennington from Belwood Elementary. All three thanked their teachers for their part in this achievement. DISPOSITION OF MINUTES OF PRIOR MEETING MOTION Darrell Montgomery moved to accept the Thursday, December 15, 2011 (Regular) meeting minutes as printed in the agenda. J. T. Zakrzewski seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Montgomery, Riley, Treat, Williams and Zakrzewski None (Miller and Teague - absent) NEW BUSINESS Audit of 2010 - 2011 School Year Denise Drennan, CFO, along with Eric Grant of Hudson, Cisne \u0026amp; Co., presented the 2010 - 2011 school year audit. Mr. Grant explained that the bank reconciliation was still listed since it was a concern the year before. Mrs. Drennan explained that this is improving during this year so that should be better for the present year's audit. MOTION John Riley moved to accept the 2010 - 2011 school year audit as presented and published by our auditor, Hudson, Cisne \u0026amp; Co., LLP Certified Public Accountants. YEAS: NAYS: Montgomery, Riley, Treat, Williams and Zakrzewski None (Miller and Teague - absent) Fiscal Distress Improvement Reports Mrs. Drennan explained that one of the Arkansas Department of Education requirements concerning fiscal distress was to publish the monthly documents of the detailed statement of changes in Fund Balances, Summary Revenue Status Report, Summary Expenditure Status Report and the Bank Reconciliation Report. Board members did not have any questions concerning these reports. MOTION John Riley moved to accept the Fiscal Distress Improvement Reports as presented and published in the agenda. Ron Treat seconded the motion. YEAS: NAYS: Montgomery, Riley, Treat, Williams and Zakrzewski None (Miller and Teague - absent) Consent Agenda Mr. Kirspel recommended the Board\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1850","title":"Multiple court filings","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2012-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)||History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education","Law","School integration","Race relations","Judicial process","History--Little Rock (Ark.)--2010-2019","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dcterms_title":["Multiple court filings"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1850"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["58 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"nge_ngen_preston-king-001","title":"Preston King","collection_id":"nge_ngen","collection_title":"New Georgia Encyclopedia","dcterms_contributor":["Photograph from C-SPAN"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Georgia, Fulton County, Atlanta, 33.749, -84.38798"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2012"],"dcterms_description":["Preston King, pictured in 2012, is a member of a family known for its activism during the Albany Movement. King was convicted of draft evasion in 1961, after he refused to comply with orders from the Albany draft board addressing him as \"Preston,\" rather than \"Mr. King.\" King jumped bail following his trial and lived abroad until 2000, when he received a pardon and returned to Georgia. A prominent academic, today King lives in Atlanta.","Photograph of Preston King. King, an accomplished lecturer and professor of philosophy, lived abroad in exile for nearly forty years. A member of an Albany, Georgia family well known for civil rights activism, King was convicted of draft evasion in 1961. Believing he had been unfairly treated, he left the country to pursue a career in higher education. On February 21, 2000, U.S. president Bill Clinton issued a pardon for King that allowed him to return home after thirty-nine years abroad."],"dc_format":["image/png"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":null,"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/UND/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["College teachers--Georgia--Atlanta","African American college teachers--Georgia--Atlanta","Civil rights workers--Georgia--Atlanta","African American civil rights workers--Georgia--Atlanta","Scholars--Georgia--Atlanta","African American scholars--Georgia--Atlanta","African American authors--Georgia--Atlanta","Men--Georgia--Atlanta","African American men--Georgia--Atlanta","Authors, American--Georgia--Atlanta"],"dcterms_title":["Preston King"],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["New Georgia Encyclopedia (Project)"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["https://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/history-archaeology/preston-king-b-1936/preston-king_001/"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":null,"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["King, Preston T., 1936-"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"sdoc_rebels","title":"Rebels: James Meredith \u0026 the integration of Ole Miss","collection_id":null,"collection_title":null,"dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Mississippi, Lafayette County, Oxford, 34.3665, -89.51925"],"dcterms_creator":["Graves, Matthew"],"dc_date":["2012"],"dcterms_description":["On October 1st 1962, James Meredith became the first African American student enrolled at the University of Mississippi. His journey to Ole Miss began with the state of Mississippi's denial and open defiance to the federal court's mandate of his admission and ended on the night of September 30th as thousands of armed protesters rioted against U.S. Marshals, Mississippi National Guard, and U.S. troops sent by President Kennedy. \"Rebels: James Meredith \u0026 the Integration of Ole Miss\" tells the incredible true story of one man's mission for equality and a state that would do everything in its power to stop him."],"dc_format":["video/mp4"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["Presidents--United States","United States--Politics and government--20th century","Civil rights movements--United States","African Americans--Civil rights","University of Mississippi","College integration--Mississippi--Oxford","Segregation in education--Mississippi--Oxford","Oxford (Miss.)--Race relations","Race riots--Mississippi--Oxford","Federal-state controversies--Mississippi"],"dcterms_title":["Rebels: James Meredith \u0026 the integration of Ole Miss"],"dcterms_type":["MovingImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Southern Documentary Project"],"edm_is_shown_by":["http://southdocs.org/project/rebels-james-meredith-and-the-integration-of-ole-miss/"],"edm_is_shown_at":null,"dcterms_temporal":["1962"],"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documentary film"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Meredith, James, 1933-","Kennedy, John F. (John Fitzgerald), 1917-1963"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1844","title":"Multiple court filings","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2011-12-27/2011-12-29"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)||History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education","Law","School integration","Race relations","Judicial process","History--Little Rock (Ark.)--2010-2019","Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dcterms_title":["Multiple court filings"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1844"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["103 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"vrc_ful_vcu-37819","title":"An oral history interview with Ida Ellett, December 13, 2011","collection_id":"vrc_ful","collection_title":"Historic Fulton Oral History Project","dcterms_contributor":["Ellett, Ida (interviewee)","Morris, Caroline Chandler, 1980- (interviewer)","Perez, Mary Patricia","Johnson, Corliss Freda","James Branch Cabell Library Special Collections and Archives.","Greater Fulton's Future (Project). Legacy Committee","Virginia Local Initiatives Support Corporation","Neighborhood Resource Center (Richmond, Va.)","The Valentine","VCU Libraries (publisher)"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Virginia, City of Richmond, 37.55376, -77.46026"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2011-12-13"],"dcterms_description":["In this interview, Ida Ellett describes her experiences growing up in the Historic Fulton neighborhood of Richmond, Va. in the 1920s and 1930s; how her family settled in Historic Fulton; memories of the schools she attended; her move to Washington, D.C. for her job with the Census Bureau; her marriage and children; paying poll taxes to register to vote; campaigning for Oliver Hill; finishing her degree at Virginia Commonwealth University; the racial segregation that existed between Historic Fulton and Fulton Hill, and feelings about the Historic Fulton development plan.","An interview conducted as part of the Historic Fulton Oral History Project documenting life in the Historic Fulton community in the East End of Richmond, Virginia."],"dc_format":null,"dcterms_identifier":["contentdm id: ful/id/74","F234.R56"],"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Historic Fulton Oral History Project"],"dcterms_subject":["Richmond (Va.)--Social conditions","Urban renewal--Virginia--Richmond","Neighborhoods--Virginia--Richmond--Social conditions"],"dcterms_title":["An oral history interview with Ida Ellett, December 13, 2011"],"dcterms_type":["Sound","Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["James Branch Cabell Library. Special Collections and Archives"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["https://digital.library.vcu.edu/islandora/object/vcu:37819"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["This material is protected by copyright, and the copyright is held by The Valentine. You are permitted to use this material in any way that is permitted by copyright. In addition, non-commercial use of this material is permitted. For any commercial uses, permission is required."],"dcterms_medium":["sound recordings","oral histories (literary works)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Ellett, Ida--Childhood and youth--Anecdotes","Ellett, Ida--Interviews"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"vrc_ful_vcu-37814","title":"An oral history interview with Linda Sutton, December 10, 2011","collection_id":"vrc_ful","collection_title":"Historic Fulton Oral History Project","dcterms_contributor":["Sutton, Linda (interviewee)","Morris, Caroline Chandler, 1980- (interviewer)","Johnson, Corliss Freda (contributor)","James Branch Cabell Library. Special Collections and Archives.","Greater Fulton's Future (Project). Legacy Committee","Virginia Local Initiatives Support Corporation","Neighborhood Resource Center (Richmond, Va.)","Valentine Richmond History Center","VCU Libraries (publisher)"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Virginia, City of Richmond, 37.55376, -77.46026"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2011-12-10"],"dcterms_description":["In this interview, Linda Sutton discusses her upbringing in the Historic Fulton neighborhood of Richmond, Va.; her early childhood memories; her family home and history in Historic Fulton; her neighborhood friends; classmates from Webster Davis School; racial prejudice she encountered in other Richmond neighborhoods; her feelings about the Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority's plan and the effect it had on her family and the community; and how she has reunited with friends from Historic Fulton.","An interview conducted as part of the Historic Fulton Oral History Project documenting life in the Historic Fulton community in the East End of Richmond, Virginia."],"dc_format":null,"dcterms_identifier":["contentdm id: ful/id/116","F234.R56"],"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Historic Fulton Oral History Project"],"dcterms_subject":["Richmond (Va.)--Social conditions","Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority","Urban renewal--Virginia--Richmond","Neighborhoods--Virginia--Richmond--Social conditions"],"dcterms_title":["An oral history interview with Linda Sutton, December 10, 2011"],"dcterms_type":["Sound","Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["James Branch Cabell Library. Special Collections and Archives"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["https://digital.library.vcu.edu/islandora/object/vcu:37814"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["This material is protected by copyright, and the copyright is held by The Valentine. You are permitted to use this material in any way that is permitted by copyright. In addition, non-commercial use of this material is permitted. For any commercial uses, permission is required."],"dcterms_medium":["sound recordings","oral histories (literary works)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Sutton, Linda--Childhood and youth--Anecdotes","Sutton, Linda--Interviews"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1419","title":"\"2011-12 Enrollment and Racial Composition of the Pulaski County Special School District,\" Office of Desegregation and Monitoring","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)"],"dc_date":["2011-12-09"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School enrollment","School integration","School management and organization"],"dcterms_title":["\"2011-12 Enrollment and Racial Composition of the Pulaski County Special School District,\" Office of Desegregation and Monitoring"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1419"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["23 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"vrc_ful_vcu-37846","title":"An oral history interview with Mary Patricia Perez, December 8, 2011","collection_id":"vrc_ful","collection_title":"Historic Fulton Oral History Project","dcterms_contributor":["Perez, Mary Patricia (interviewee)","Morris, Caroline Chandler, 1980- (interviewer)","Johnson, Corliss Freda (contributor)","James Branch Cabell Library Special Collections and Archives.","Greater Fulton's Future (Project). Legacy Committee","Virginia Local Initiatives Support Corporation","Neighborhood Resource Center (Richmond, Va.)","The Valentine","VCU Libraries (publisher)"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Virginia, City of Richmond, 37.55376, -77.46026"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2011-12-08"],"dcterms_description":["In this interview, Reverend Mary Patricia Perez describes growing up in the Historic Fulton neighborhood of Richmond, Va.; her early childhood memories; the role of music and the church in her life; the direction of her ministry; her feelings about the urban renewal project; what Historic Fulton used to be like; and what she would like to see in Historic Fulton now and in the future.","An interview conducted as part of the Historic Fulton Oral History Project documenting life in the Historic Fulton community in the East End of Richmond, Virginia."],"dc_format":null,"dcterms_identifier":["contentdm id: ful/id/101","F234.R56"],"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Historic Fulton Oral History Project"],"dcterms_subject":["Richmond (Va.)--Social conditions","Neighborhoods--Virginia--Richmond--Social conditions","Urban renewal--Virginia--Richmond","African American women clergy--Virginia--Richmond--Interviews"],"dcterms_title":["An oral history interview with Mary Patricia Perez, December 8, 2011"],"dcterms_type":["Sound","Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["James Branch Cabell Library. Special Collections and Archives"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["https://digital.library.vcu.edu/islandora/object/vcu:37846"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["This material is protected by copyright, and the copyright is held by The Valentine. You are permitted to use this material in any way that is permitted by copyright. In addition, non-commercial use of this material is permitted. For any commercial uses, permission is required."],"dcterms_medium":["sound recordings","oral histories (literary works)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Perez, Mary Patricia--Interviews","Perez, Mary Patricia--Childhood and youth--Anecdotes"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1841","title":"Multiple court filings","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2011-12-02/2011-12-19"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)||History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education","Law","School integration","Race relations","Judicial process","History--Little Rock (Ark.)--2010-2019","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)"],"dcterms_title":["Multiple court filings"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1841"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["145 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null}],"pages":{"current_page":206,"next_page":207,"prev_page":205,"total_pages":6766,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":2460,"total_count":81191,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"educator_resource_mediums_sms","items":[{"value":"lesson plans","hits":319},{"value":"teaching guides","hits":53},{"value":"timelines (chronologies)","hits":43},{"value":"online exhibitions","hits":38},{"value":"bibliographies","hits":15},{"value":"study guides","hits":11},{"value":"annotated bibliographies","hits":9},{"value":"learning modules","hits":6},{"value":"worksheets","hits":6},{"value":"slide shows","hits":4},{"value":"quizzes","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":40200},{"value":"StillImage","hits":35114},{"value":"MovingImage","hits":4552},{"value":"Sound","hits":3248},{"value":"Collection","hits":41},{"value":"InteractiveResource","hits":25}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"Peppler, Jim","hits":4965},{"value":"Phay, John E.","hits":4712},{"value":"University of Mississippi. Bureau of Educational Research","hits":4707},{"value":"Baldowski, Clifford H., 1917-1999","hits":2599},{"value":"Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission","hits":2255},{"value":"Thurmond, Strom, 1902-2003","hits":2077},{"value":"WSB-TV (Television station : Atlanta, Ga.)","hits":1475},{"value":"Newman, I. DeQuincey (Isaiah DeQuincey), 1911-1985","hits":1003},{"value":"The State Media Company (Columbia, S.C.)","hits":926},{"value":"Atlanta Journal-Constitution","hits":844},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":778}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"African Americans--Civil rights","hits":9441},{"value":"Civil rights","hits":8347},{"value":"African Americans","hits":5895},{"value":"Mississippi--Race relations","hits":5750},{"value":"Race relations","hits":5607},{"value":"Education, Secondary","hits":5083},{"value":"Education, Elementary","hits":4729},{"value":"Segregation in education--Mississippi","hits":4727},{"value":"Education--Pictorial works","hits":4707},{"value":"Civil rights demonstrations","hits":4436},{"value":"Civil rights workers","hits":3530}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966--Correspondence","hits":1888},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1809},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1709},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1312},{"value":"Baker, Augusta, 1911-1998","hits":1282},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1071},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":858},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":814},{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":719},{"value":"Mizell, M. Hayes","hits":674},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":626}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"name_authoritative_sms","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":2598},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1909},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1704},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1331},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1070},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":856},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":806},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":625},{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":605},{"value":"Snelling, Paula","hits":580},{"value":"Williams, Hosea, 1926-2000","hits":431}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Nobel Prize","hits":1763},{"value":"Ole Miss Integration","hits":1670},{"value":"Housing Act of 1961","hits":965},{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":704},{"value":"Memphis Sanitation Workers Strike","hits":366},{"value":"Selma-Montgomery March","hits":337},{"value":"Freedom Summer","hits":306},{"value":"Freedom Rides","hits":214},{"value":"Poor People's Campaign","hits":180},{"value":"University of Georgia Integration","hits":173},{"value":"University of Alabama Integration","hits":140}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":17820},{"value":"United States, Georgia, Fulton County, Atlanta, 33.749, -84.38798","hits":5428},{"value":"United States, Alabama, Montgomery County, Montgomery, 32.36681, -86.29997","hits":5151},{"value":"United States, Georgia, 32.75042, -83.50018","hits":4862},{"value":"United States, South Carolina, 34.00043, -81.00009","hits":4610},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":4177},{"value":"United States, Alabama, 32.75041, -86.75026","hits":3943},{"value":"United States, Mississippi, 32.75041, -89.75036","hits":2910},{"value":"United States, Tennessee, Shelby County, Memphis, 35.14953, -90.04898","hits":2579},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":2430},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":2387}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Georgia","hits":12843},{"value":"Alabama","hits":11307},{"value":"Mississippi","hits":10219},{"value":"South Carolina","hits":8503},{"value":"Arkansas","hits":4583},{"value":"Texas","hits":4399},{"value":"Tennessee","hits":3770},{"value":"Florida","hits":2601},{"value":"Ohio","hits":2391},{"value":"North Carolina","hits":1893},{"value":"New York","hits":1667}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1966","hits":10514},{"value":"1963","hits":10193},{"value":"1965","hits":10119},{"value":"1956","hits":9832},{"value":"1955","hits":9611},{"value":"1964","hits":9268},{"value":"1968","hits":9243},{"value":"1962","hits":9152},{"value":"1967","hits":8771},{"value":"1957","hits":8460},{"value":"1958","hits":8242},{"value":"1961","hits":8241},{"value":"1959","hits":8046},{"value":"1960","hits":7940},{"value":"1954","hits":7239},{"value":"1969","hits":7235},{"value":"1950","hits":7117},{"value":"1953","hits":6968},{"value":"1970","hits":6743},{"value":"1971","hits":6337},{"value":"1977","hits":6280},{"value":"1952","hits":6161},{"value":"1972","hits":6144},{"value":"1951","hits":6045},{"value":"1975","hits":5806},{"value":"1976","hits":5771},{"value":"1974","hits":5729},{"value":"1973","hits":5591},{"value":"1979","hits":5329},{"value":"1978","hits":5318},{"value":"1980","hits":5279},{"value":"1995","hits":4829},{"value":"1981","hits":4724},{"value":"1994","hits":4654},{"value":"1948","hits":4596},{"value":"1949","hits":4571},{"value":"1996","hits":4486},{"value":"1982","hits":4330},{"value":"1947","hits":4316},{"value":"1985","hits":4226},{"value":"1998","hits":4225},{"value":"1997","hits":4202},{"value":"1983","hits":4174},{"value":"1984","hits":4065},{"value":"1946","hits":4046},{"value":"1999","hits":4018},{"value":"1945","hits":4017},{"value":"1990","hits":3937},{"value":"1986","hits":3919},{"value":"1943","hits":3899},{"value":"1944","hits":3895},{"value":"1942","hits":3867},{"value":"2000","hits":3808},{"value":"2001","hits":3790},{"value":"1940","hits":3764},{"value":"1941","hits":3757},{"value":"1987","hits":3657},{"value":"2002","hits":3538},{"value":"1991","hits":3507},{"value":"1936","hits":3506},{"value":"1939","hits":3500},{"value":"1938","hits":3465},{"value":"1937","hits":3449},{"value":"1992","hits":3444},{"value":"1993","hits":3422},{"value":"2003","hits":3403},{"value":"1930","hits":3377},{"value":"1989","hits":3355},{"value":"1935","hits":3306},{"value":"1933","hits":3270},{"value":"1934","hits":3270},{"value":"1988","hits":3269},{"value":"1932","hits":3254},{"value":"1931","hits":3239},{"value":"2005","hits":3057},{"value":"2004","hits":2909},{"value":"1929","hits":2789},{"value":"2006","hits":2774},{"value":"1928","hits":2271},{"value":"1921","hits":2123},{"value":"1925","hits":2039},{"value":"1927","hits":2025},{"value":"1924","hits":2011},{"value":"1926","hits":2009},{"value":"1920","hits":1975},{"value":"1923","hits":1954},{"value":"1922","hits":1928},{"value":"2016","hits":1925},{"value":"2007","hits":1629},{"value":"2008","hits":1578},{"value":"2011","hits":1575},{"value":"2019","hits":1537},{"value":"1919","hits":1532},{"value":"2009","hits":1532},{"value":"1918","hits":1530},{"value":"2015","hits":1527},{"value":"2013","hits":1518},{"value":"2010","hits":1515},{"value":"2014","hits":1481},{"value":"2012","hits":1467}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"0193","max":"2035","count":500952,"missing":56},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"photographs","hits":10708},{"value":"correspondence","hits":9437},{"value":"black-and-white photographs","hits":7678},{"value":"negatives (photographs)","hits":7513},{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":4462},{"value":"letters (correspondence)","hits":3623},{"value":"oral histories (literary works)","hits":3607},{"value":"black-and-white negatives","hits":2740},{"value":"editorial cartoons","hits":2620},{"value":"newspapers","hits":1955},{"value":"manuscripts (documents)","hits":1692}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/","hits":41178},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":17554},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/UND/1.0/","hits":8828},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/","hits":6864},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/","hits":2186},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/","hits":1778},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-CR/1.0/","hits":1115},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","hits":197},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/","hits":60},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-RUU/1.0/","hits":51},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","hits":27}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Jim Peppler Southern Courier Photograph Collection","hits":4956},{"value":"John E. Phay Collection ","hits":4706},{"value":"John J. Herrera Papers","hits":3288},{"value":"Baldy Editorial Cartoons, 1946-1982, 1997: Clifford H. Baldowski Editorial Cartoons at the Richard B. Russell Library.","hits":2607},{"value":"Sovereignty Commission Online","hits":2335},{"value":"Strom Thurmond Collection, Mss 100","hits":2068},{"value":"Alabama Media Group Collection","hits":2067},{"value":"Black Trailblazers, Leaders, Activists, and Intellectuals in Cleveland","hits":2033},{"value":"Rosa Parks Papers","hits":1948},{"value":"Isaiah DeQuincey Newman, (1911-1985), Papers, 1929-2003","hits":1904},{"value":"Lillian Eugenia Smith Papers (circa 1920-1980)","hits":1887}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"John Davis Williams Library. Department of Archives and Special Collections","hits":8885},{"value":"Alabama. Department of Archives and History","hits":8146},{"value":"Atlanta University Center Robert W. Woodruff Library","hits":4102},{"value":"South Caroliniana Library","hits":4024},{"value":"University of North Texas. Libraries","hits":3854},{"value":"Hargrett Library","hits":3292},{"value":"University of South Carolina. Libraries","hits":3212},{"value":"Richard B. Russell Library for Political Research and Studies","hits":2874},{"value":"Mississippi. Department of Archives and History","hits":2825},{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":2633},{"value":"Rhodes College","hits":2264}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":80736},{"value":"Collection","hits":455}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":80994},{"value":"true","hits":197}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}