{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1738","title":"District Court records of Little Rock School District (LRSD) and North Little Rock School District's (NLRSD's) notice of filing agreements as required by order filed March 1, 2000 and Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) response to the Court's order.","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["2002-04"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Little Rock School District","Joshua intervenors","School employees","Educational law and legislation","Magnet schools","Retirement","Insurance","Educational planning","School improvement programs","School integration","Students","African Americans--Education","School enrollment","School attendance","Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st century"],"dcterms_title":["District Court records of Little Rock School District (LRSD) and North Little Rock School District's (NLRSD's) notice of filing agreements as required by order filed March 1, 2000 and Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) response to the Court's order."],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1738"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["64 page scan, typed"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\u003c?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"utf-8\"?\u003e\n\u003citems type=\"array\"\u003e  \u003citem\u003e   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_description type=\"array\"\u003e   \n\n\u003cdcterms_description\u003eCourt filings: District Court, Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) notice of filing agreements as required by order filed March 1, 2002; District Court, Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) response to the Court's order dated March 1, 2002; District Court, North Little Rock School District's (NLRSD's) notice of filing agreements as required by order filed March 1, 2002; District Court, Joshua intervenors' notice of filing as required by order filed March 1, 2002; District Court, order; Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) response to the Joshua intervenors' notice of filing agreements as required by order filed March 1, 2002; District Court, second motion for extension of time to respond to Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) motion for an immediate declaration of unitary status; District Court, Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) response to Joshua intervenors' notice of filing as required by order filed March 1, 2002; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool    This transcript was create using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.    \\: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION RECEIVED APR -1 2002 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL LRSD'S NOTICE OF FILING AGREEMENTS AS REQUIRED BY ORDER FILED MARCH 1, 2002 DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTER VEN ORS The Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") files the agreements identified below and attached hereto as required by the Court's order filed March 1, 2002: I. Teacher Quality Enhancement Grant Program agreement between the LRSD, PCSSD and NLRSD; 2. Early Childhood Special Education agreement between the LRSD, PCSSD andNLRSD; 3. Agreement between the LRSD and the State dated March 19, 2001 re: unitary status, sale of bonds and $20 million loan. 4. Memorandum of Understanding between the LRSD and the State re: magnet seats. 1 5. Agreement between the LRSD and Knight dated February 6, 1999, re: teacher retirement and health insurance funding. 1Attached is what the LRSD believes to be the final draft of that agreement. Counsel for the LRSD could not locate an executed copy of the agreement in their files. - 6. Agreement between the LRSD, PCSSD, NLRSD, Joshua and Knight dated February 8, 1999 re: teacher retirement and health insurance funding. 7. Settlement Agreement between the LRSD and PCSSD dated February 9, 1999 re: pooling agreement and teacher retirement and health insurance funding. 8. Agreement between the LRSD and Joshua dated June 10, 1998 re: past and future attorneys' fees for monitoring of the LRSD. 9. Interdistrict Desegregation Plan dated April 29, 1992, as modified and incorporated into Section 4 of the LRSD's Revised Desegregation and Education Plan and Section E of PCSSD's Plan 2000 (not attached). 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Settlement Agreement as revised September 28, 1989 (not attached). The \"Allen Letter\" dated May 31 , 1989. Magnet Stipulation dated February 16, 1987 (not attached). M-to-M Stipulation dated August 26, 1986 (not attached). Summary of unwritten agreement between the LRSD, PCS SD and NLRSD regarding hiring teachers under contact with another district. Summary of unwritten agreement between the LRSD and the LRCTA regarding the use of intern teachers to fill vacancies. Respectfully Submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK Christopher Heller (#81083) John C. Fendley, Jr. (#92182) 2000 Regions Center 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 (501) 376-2011 BYoiu~:c. t-~d' Fendley, Jr. 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the following persons by depositing a copy of same in the United States mail on April 1, 2002: Mr. John W. Walker JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Sam Jones Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 425 W. Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201-3472 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell Law Firm 11800 Pleasant Ridge Road, Suite 146 Post Office Box 17388 Little Rock, Arkansas 72222-7388 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Marshall (hand-delivered) Desegregation Monitor 1 Union National Plaza 124 W. Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Hagemeier Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 3 A. COVER PAGE Arkansas Department of Higher Education Grant Competition - FY2002 Teacher Quality Enhancement Grant Program , PROJECT TITLE Teachers of Tomorrow 2002 1. LEGAL APPLICANT/RECIPIENT a. Institution Little Rock School District and University of Central Arkansas Please check ~ categcry: Recruilment -L Preparation __ Professional Dev. b. Street/P.O. Box_ __- -\"9'\"'4. .1.7. \"--\"G\"\"e'\"'\"y\"\"er-'S\"\"p'-'-r'-'-in_,g=-s.:..R:.:o.:a=-d_ ___c . City Little Rock GRANT APPL/CATION NO. d. County ___ P-'u=la~s\"'\"k'\"\"i ___________ e. State_\"\"'A'\"'R ___ f. Zip Code. _ __:.7-=2=20=9._ __ _ g. PROJECT DIRECTOR(S) Name _ W.;..:.;:a:.:.:n.:d=-a ,B:.:a:.;:s:.:.:k:..:.;in:.:.s..:a:.:..:n.:d..;.Ka::ac.:.:.th.:.:.;lee=-=n'-\"A..,t,.,,ki::..,.n:::..s _______________ _ Email: WFBaskila)MCC.LRSD.Kl2.AR.US Telephone: 501-570-4144, 501-224-7736 and 501-450-5429 Department: Career and Technical Education Fax: 501-570-4144 and 501-224-7736 2. NAME(S) OF COLLABORATING SCHOOL 3. NAMES, TITLES AND PHONE #'S OF COLLABORATING SCHOOUCOLLEGE OFFICIALS Dr. Kathleen Atkins, Chair of Early Childhood and Special Educ. 501-450-5429 DISTRICTIS) AND COLLEGES Little Rock, North Little Rock, Pulaski County Special School District, UCA, UAPB, UALR, and Henderson PERSONS WHO WILL PROVIDE INSTRUCTION (name and department) A Dr. Alvin Futrell, ColleQe of Education at Henderson and Dr. Kathleen Atkins, ColleQe of Education at Univ of Central AR  Or. Bill GeiQer, ColleQe of Education at UALR 3. Or. Dorethea Davis, College of Education at University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff 6. PROPOSED FUNDING 7a. FEDERAl. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT a. Grant Request $ 47,400 .00 (#) OF APPLICANT INSTITUTION(S): b. Applicant Match $ 48,050 .00 .00 7b. FEDERAl. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT (#) OF SCHOOL DISTRICTS SERVED: c. Cooperating Partner Match $ $ 1---------------+--------------i d. Other .00 Ba. PROJECT START 8b. PROJECT DURATION e. TOTAL $ 95,450 .00 JANUARY 1, 2002 12 MONTHS 9. PROJECT DIRECTOR NAME (Print): Wanda Baskins Kathleen Atkins SIGNATURE: 10. 11 . AUTHORITY RESPONSIBLE FOR GRANT ACTION TAKEN a. Awarded ____ _ b. Rejected ____ _ :eturn for amendment _____ _ d. Withdrawn _____ _ NAME (Print): Wanda Baskins Kathleen Atkins SIGNATURE: 12. FUNDING a. Grant Award $ b. Applicant Match $ c. Cooperating Partner $ Match d. Other $ e. TOTAL $ TITLE: DATE: TITLE: DATE: 13. REMARKS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 TOT Program Director Chair/Early Childhood TOT Project Director Chair Early Childhood ...;  EXHIBIT \\_--------~------..J-----~---------~1 I !,. IC 8. PROJECT ABSTRACT Arkansas Department of Higher Education Grant Competition - FY2002 Teacher Quality Enhancement Grant Program Please type. Complete all items on both sides. This form will be submitted to the Governor's office. PROJECT TITLE: Teachers of Tomorrow 2002 INSTITUTION: University of Central Arkansas PROJECT DIRECTOR(S): Wanda Baskins (Little Rock School District) Dr. Kathleen Atkins (U.C.A) PARTICIPATING LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICTS: Little Rock School District, North Little Rock School District, and Pulaski County Special School District Category chosen ___X _T eacher Recruitment and Retention _____ Teacher Preparation ~ ___ Teacher Professional Development (check which area) Mathematics Science __ Foreign Language __ Special Education NUMBER OF ANTICIPATED PARTICIPANTS: _330 _In-Service Teachers --- Pre-Service Teachers _50_ College Faculty _350_ Other (Explain) Celebration in Teaching Program Banquet and Hall High Symposium PROJECT RATIONALE (Brief statement of assessed needs) : According to The National Education Association we are facing the most critical teacher shortage in history . Nationwide, some 2.4 million teachers will be needed in the next 11 years because of teacher attrition, retirement, and increased student enrollment. An estimated 6 percent of the nation's teaching force leaves the profession and 7 percent change schools per year. The National Center of Education Statistics report twenty percent of all new teachers will leave the field of teaching within three years, while nearly fifty  percent of new teachers in urban areas will exit the profession their first five years of teaching . As we face higher teacher attrition rates and decreased number of graduates in teacher education programs, public school student enrollment will continue to increase. By 2008 public school enrollment will exceed 54 million, and approximate 2 million increase over today's enrollment. - While research based statistics on teacher shortage in Arkansas are difficult to locate, districts in the state are finding that hiring new teachers is becoming more problematic (\"School Districts Make Sweet Deals to Attract Teachers,\" Arkansas Democrat Gazette, 1999). The Arkansas Department of Higher Education 2 disseminated data in 2000 on the number of graduates with Baccalaureate and Master's Education Degrees in Arkansas from 1994-1999. This data indicates fewer number of students graduated with education degrees jiSE and MSE degrees combined) in 1999 than in previous years. Clearly this will have an impact on the . ilability of future teachers. Recruitment of future teachers must also focus on quality. With the current state and national emphasis on student achievement, we must recognize in order to improve student achievement we must improve the quality of teaching. Our future teachers of Arkansas must receive preparation programs that ensure the building of the knowledge, skills, and dispositions of a qualified teacher. The Teachers of Tomorrow Program seeks to continue long-range teacher recruitment efforts for Little Rock, North Little Rock, and Pulaski County School Districts by promoting and expanding the future teacher clubs/classes and by providing activities that will broaden its mission and service into other areas of the state. Although fewer college students are pursuing teaching careers, the redesign of the Teachers of Tomorrow Program using the South Carolina Teacher Cadet and Pro Team curriculum is encouraging. The Teacher Quality Enhancement (TQE) funding is vital for the enhancement of secondary and middle school classes being offered, and is needed to help provide networking opportunities for educators in the state who are interested in teacher recruitment and retention. \"For many, the pre-teaching experience acts as a springboard to college, career, and personal relationships where learning can be applied and nurtured.\" (May 2001 Recruiting New Teachers, Inc.) 3 GOALS (Statement of specific learning and performance objectives for participants): 41,als of the Teacher Quality Enhancement grant, TOT 2002, are to: 1) implement elective classes designed to encourage secondary students to consider teaching as a profession (using the South Carolina Teacher Cadet curriculum) 2) promote networking and recruitment opportunities between public schools, two-year colleges, and four year institutions 3) develop an awareness about the teacher shortage in Arkansas and 4) complete training/certification of two Teacher Cadet trainers. GENERAL PROGRAM DESCRIPTION (ABSTRACT} which will be shared publicly (200 words): The Teachers of Tomorrow program seeks to continue its long range teacher recruitment efforts for Arkansas by promoting and expanding the existing Teachers of Tomorrow program and by providing activities that will broaden its mission and service into other areas of the state. The activities will include: providing materials and training for secondary school teachers to implement the Teacher Cadet class (senior high school) curriculum developed by the South Carolina Center for Teacher Recruitment.  conducting a statewide Teacher Recruitment Conference in fall 2002 that is designed for secondary and higher education students, public school administrators and faculty, and teacher educators.  providing the means for two Arkansas teachers to become Teacher Cadet trainers (by completing final cycle of training in Little Rock summer workshop).  designing and distributing a teacher recruitment pamphlet for students in two-year colleges . .  supplying Teachers of Tomorrow Clubs and TOT coordinators in the tri-district area with support in order to plan student activities and carry out various collaborative activities.  Expand elective classes to include middle school students exploring teaching as a career (using the South Carolina Pro Team Curriculum).  Create a TOT website which will include a database for club and class participants. Institutions involved in the Teacher of Tomorrow collaborative include: Little Rock School District, North - ittle Rock School District, Pulaski County Special School District, Henderson State University, University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff, and University of Arkansas at Little Rock. 4 . .03/ 21/ 2002 10:33 5014901352 I t \u0026gt;    EQUITY Pl.FIL SERVICE .. I( : ~. .- 2-1-20. 02. 1.0 ;~ 14 . F.'R (JII! TO:';'l~ i\"---------~ ~- ------------=---- : . :  .. I ' I ; ; CONSOLIDATED PRESCHOOL ' GRANT APPLICATION FOR I ' SPECIAL EDUCATION AND ; : RELATED SERVICES : :::  : I .. . . ,   ~ L  \\ . . I j ; .. ' ; ; ' I I . I I SECTION6J.9 OF THE INDIVIDUALS WITH I I DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT ' I. -AND STATE FUNDS /: I :1 : I' ' ~ ' ' ' : : fi ' i ; ' : ; ' ARKANSAS DEPARTivfENT OF EDUCATION ., : , ; ' 2001-02 .. ' : ,. f .. I .. i ; I .. ; . . '. ' ., : ; J .. ' : -- - -- ..  i l .~ IC p~ 02/16 P . 002\"'01 .1 i: ! .. , i ' :t ., '  ' . I ; : : - '' i ! ii !/ ~ -. '  ! ' : ; EXHIBIT z ' I I i '  ' . ;., , - 1: : . ,. :i l !! I I EQUITY PUPIL SERVICE TO: '34900254 ASSURANCES AND AGREEMENTS FOR EDUCATIONAL SERVlCE AGENCIES . Adopdon of Proccdul\"C$: The applicant agrees to implement Spectal Education and Related '. Srrvi~~: Procedural \u0026amp;cp,tremuit:l and Program Standards and S~cial d11catlon Ellgib/Jily ; Cr/Jeri a and Program Guidelims for Childrun with Dlsabilitie$. Ages 3  21 to ensure that it  provid~ special eduwion services to emlble clu1dren with disabilities, ages three to; five~ to ' participate in regular educational programs and that each child has a properly developed , inc,vidualized education program. ; AdvJSory Committee: Where several LEAs consolidated their prcschool .scmccs, the applicant :. agrees to establish a local advisory committee. The committee must consist of the special ; edu~tion supervisors from participating LEAs and at least one superintendent. The committee : will be co-chaired by the early childhood coordinator and a LEA special education supervisor : select~ by the committee. The committee will meet at least bi-monthly, DocumentAtion of each meeting will be kept en file. : A!,istive Technology: The applicant, in accordance with 34 CFR 300,308, shall ensure that . assistive technology devices or assistive technology~ or both, as defined in 34 CFR 300.5 ,  300,6, are made available to a: child with a disability if required as a part of the child's (1)  Special Ed1.1cation under 34 CFR 300,26, (2) R~ated services under 34 CFR 300,24, or (3)  Supplementary aids and ser'.Vices under 34 CFR 300,28 and 300,SSO(b)(2), : Child Ctrc: The applicant assures that preschool grant funds shall not be used for the securing ' ofbasic child care and that these monies be used only for the provision of special education and rcl~ted services rend~ by,. a qualified provider. It i\u0026amp; pemussible ro expend preschool grant funds to pay costs associ.ited with a regular daycare placement when it is determined ~hat: ' l,;'~stidr educational placement-is needed to provide :a Free Appropriate Public Education ' (FAP.E) to a child, and  . ,. I ~- ; ; ' '  2. ::sbch:educarlqnal placement is necessary to satisfy th~ provisions of the cl\\ild's individualii=  , : education program (lEP). The decision to place a child'\"in, a rc:gula.r daycare program -win be made on a ca1\u0026amp;-by-asc oasis, The State guidelines for a Integrated Preschool Settine must be used in determining a child's ; riee.d(for,an educatjonai pla~ent in a regular daycare program .  1., : , . . Complaint ProcufuttS of ID State! The applicant, in accordance with EDGAR 34 CFR 660, ' ~ that it will provide a. copy of the wrinen procedures fur Complaint Management to parents of children with disabilities when they llre notified of their procedural safeguar\u0026lt;is, 2 .. .. , ' I PAGE 03/16 P.003-'014  :i ; 1 i ' I ,''- . 03/ 21/2002 10: 33 5014901352 'i ;_  . :I . l\". FR-, 21-20 02 10~ 14 ~: EQUITY PUPIL SERVICE TO: ';),q~e0c:54 , Coordination of Projects: The applicant, in accordance with EDGAR 34 CFR 76.580, as~ : to the extent possible, it coordinate each of its projects with other activities that are in the same ; geographic area served by the project and targeted groups. Appropriate methods of coordination  include:   l. :Planning the project with organizations and individuals who have sinu1ar objectives or concerns; : 2.  Sharing information, facilitie~, staff, services or other resourc~;  J .. ~ngaging in joint activities such as instruction, needs assessment, evaluation, monitoring, technical assistance or swf training; ;. 4., 1N?_t ~uplicating or counteracting the effects of funds used under 9thcr programs; ilild S. Using the project funds to increa.(e the impact of funds made available under other programs , . :for the same purpose. Dls:ciplinnry Information: The applicant, in accordarn:e with 34 CFR JOO .Sl9  300.529, ' as~r'es thnt it will maintain in the records ofa child with a disability a statement of any current  or -previous di5ciplinary action that has been taken against the child and transmit such statei:nent -~ to th~ same extent that such disciplinary information is included in, and transmitted with, the  studt;tt records ofnondisahled children. If the State has such a policy, and the child transfers from one school to another, the transmission of any of the child's records must include: both the child1 s current individuaftz;cd education program and any such statement of current or previous disciprmary action that has been taken !lgainst the child. ' Idui!:itional Responsibilil)'! The applicam agrees to provide special education and related  services on the behalf of assigned LEAs for duldrcn with disabilities, ages three to five; under  Section 619 of IDEA 97. The applicant will develop an inter-agency agreement with the: : appropriate Head Start pro,rain for the provision of special education a.nd related services as specified in the Memo~-um ofUndersr.anding (between the Arkansas Department ofE.ducation and !_iead Start) consi!tent with the federal regulations for Head Stcrt, Public Law 102A01 . . E1cess Cost: The applicant, in accordance ',l,,'ith 34 CFR 300.184  300.185, a.$SUres that funds pr9ided under Section 619 of IDEA 97 wit! be used Q!ll:l for excess costs. Extended School Ycsr: The applicant, in accordance with 34 CFR 300.309, shall ensure that ~ded school year $er-vices are available as n~ as to provide a m:e appropriate public education. H~r.ing Aids: The applieant, in accordance with 34 CFR 300.3031 shall ensure that the hearing aids wom in school by children with hearing impairments. including d~ are functioning properly . . . . I : . -: .. . : ; :,, PAGE 04/16 P,l!IEM'01,q -I !: rnunv PUPIL SERVICE T0:'3'1~4 Least Restrictive Environment: The applicant, in accord Mee with 34 CFR. 300.SSO - 300.556, assures it has adopted the policies and procedures of Special Education and l~laled Serv/\"3: Procedural Requirements and Program Standards, Section IJ, pages 1 and 2; and Section 17, pag$2. I L\u0026amp;2J lnterngcncy Committee: The applicant agrees to establi$h a local interagency committee comr.osed oflocal agencies and int~ parties for the dissemination of information and to establish a network of services. The committee will meet at le~ quarterly. Documentation of attendees and minutes of i;aeh mc::ting must be kept on file. Meet[nis: The applicant agrees that individuals employed under this application will p81t!cipate in training institutes and scheduled meetings sponsored by the Arkansa. Department of 4.u~tion, Sp~ial Edu~tion. I N o.n~crimhultioa and Employment of tndividuala wil.h Disnbilitics: The applicant assu~ that the program assisted under. Section 619 of IDEA 97 will be operated ,n compliance with Title!45 of the Code ofFedenl Regulations, Pa.rt 84. (A formal ast:Urance statemem should be on -~e with the U.S. Dept. of Health and Hllman Services.) , I Nonsuppbnting: The applicant, in accordance with 34 CFR 300.230, usures that funds prqvided. under Section 619 of IDEA 97 will be used to supplement and, to the cctcnt ptjlciicablc, increuc the level of State a.nd Local funds e,\u0026lt;pended for the education of children with disabilities, ages three to 6ve. and in no case to supplant those State and Local funds. :: ..- :; ,, : . Nti~ber or Days for l\u0026gt;ired Services: The prcscltool instructional calendar shall consist of200 days of direct services .funded by the prescltool grant. The first day of services can be Jio earlier th~\\August' 1. Dim:t services will cease by June 30. An audit will be peronned to verify sctvice delivery of200 days; Faiturc to comply will result in an audit e,c~on. Please provide a school calendar or llstin.g of day per momh that services will he provided. Please use the caJ~dar included in the application. Personnel Devdopment: The applicant, in accordance with 34 CFR. 300.221, assures that it ba.-. tiled':with the State information to demonstrate that (1) all personnel necessary to cany O'llt Section 619 o!lDEA 97 within the jurisdictign of the agency are adequate!y prepared cons~ wi~ the requirement of 34 CFR 300.380- 300.382, and (2) to the extent the public agency determine! appropriate, it shall contribute to and use the Comprehensive System of P~onnel Development of State established under 34 CFR 300.135. 1 f, . . Foliciet .and Program, Consistent with EUgfbillty Provisions: The appficant. in accordance withi 34 CFR 300.220, assures that it has in cffcc:t policies.. procedure! and programs- that are ~$istei,t with Stare policies and procedlftS established under 34 CFR 300.121 - 300.156 . . The applics.nt mUSt have on file with the State polici~ and procedu~ on the following: (l} Child Identification, (Z) Confidentiality, and (\u0026gt;) Individualized Education Program. I I ' 4 ': I ' . / PAGE 05/16 P,00S\"014 / . 1: .; 03/ 21/2002 10: 33 5014901352 l1 : ~~~ ;10:1~ FROM: . j iii . EQUITY PUPIL SERVICE TOt94980a54 iL\\ ,  .-;,, Procrdund Safeguards: The spplicant, in accordance with 34 CPR 300.500 - 515 300.517 incorybrat~ by rcfcn:nc~ tile proi:ed1.2~ of the SEA in Special Education and Relatfd  Stsl'Vices: Procedural Reqz/iJ-emrmts and Program Standards., Sections 4 through 16. , \"ro,grnm Options: The applicant, in aoc;ordance with 34 CFR. 300.124, usures compliance with th~provi~on of.a continuum ofser-lice options. The program options that arc designed to meet thejull educational goal in pre.school education are as follows: 1. , Preschool class on the public school campus 2. Regular p~hool (including Head Start)  3. Special Day Service Facility licensed by Developmental Disability Services  4. 'Home ServiQ?S 5. Itinerant Service - Services provided to children through an itinerant mode for intensive _;_ ,  :.i?struction which may~ developmentally appropriate or therapeutic. Primary use of.this '  service may be speech-l11nguage pathology given by a qualified provider or special instruction . by an e.u-ly childhood special education consultant teacher. 6 .. '. '.Hospital 7. Re!idential  Note: Each child mu!t be presented with at least three placement options (settings) wh~re the IEP can be appropriately implemented.  P~t~tion in tvnlu!!rion Procedures: The applicant, in ~ccordance with 34 CFR 300.530. ' 300.536, adopts by reference the procedures of the SEA in Special EducaJJon and Related . Se.ry/ce3: Procedural Requirements a,id Program Standards, Sections 4, 6 and 7.  I f   , , Pul\u0026gt;l~c! Control of Funding: The appUce.nt assures that control of funds provided under Section '.. 619 qflDEA 97 and Statc/I.oc.al funds committed to Special Edu.cation in accordance with Ark 6de Ann. 6-203 l 0 and title to property acquired with those funds is in a public agency for the ._ \\lSCS and purposes-authorized and as provided in the Mansas Department of Education, School  and :Educational Service Cooperative F'inincial Accounting Manual. . .. J:lccdrd, lhld Reports: The:applicant, in accordance with 34 CFR 300.240, agrees to ;provide information as may be neceasary to enable the State Education Agm:;y to perf'mm its duticz, and  the applicant agrees to -keep such records a, the State Educ:itional Ageney may require to ensure '. rhe'~rrectness and verification ofthe iruorma.tio~  Rctciltion of Records: Education Department General Adrninisir:\u0026gt;tive Regulations (EDGAR) 34: CFR. 76.734 requires that recipients of Section 619 funds retain for five (5) years after completion of the activity for which they use grant or subgrant funds, any record needed to fully show compliance with pn)~ and administrative requirements. The Special Education Office !fas been advised by the U.S: Department ofEducation, Office of. Special Education Programs, 5 PAGE 07/16 .-.-,w. .. I   I I I I; Ii !' ~: 1 .. ... ,''. EQUITY PUPIL SERVICE TO:~ that~ include individualized education progmns (IDs). The ilRplir.ant as,w~ to take all of the necessan: steps to retain nil records for at tesst five (S} years after tbe completion of the activitv S~ces :ind Aid.s That Also ~enetit No.nd.i!abled Oindren: The applicant, in accordance with: 34 CF'R. 300.235, as!ures that costs of special education and related services and supp/ementary aids and services provided in a regular class or other education-related setting to 2 ,}illci with a disability are in accordance with the individualized education program of a. child, even if one or more nondisabkd children benefit from such services. . I . Gtn~rnl Education l\"n,visiona Act: The applicant assures that it will comply with :the assurances set forth below as stated in the General Education J\u0026gt;rovisions Act in compliance with 20 llS.C. 1.232 e(b)(J),(S),(7),(A)\u0026amp;(B),(S) and (9). The general application submitted by a i pu~li~ asency under subsection (a) shall \u0026amp;et forth assurances -   1)  1'hiU the public agency will administer each program covered by the application in  accordance with all appUe2ble statutes. regulations, program plans, and applications; ; 2) : That the control of funds pr.ovided to the public agency under each program and titl~ to : property acquired with those funds, will be in a public agency and that a public aiency will  . :~minister those funds and property;  : 1' 3) .. That the public agency will use fiscal control and :fund accounting procedure\u0026amp; that will ensure  .' P,roper disbursem~ of, and accounting for, Federal funds paid to that agency under each \\ ;:program; t) ;i'l:h~t the public agency will make reports to the State agency or board and_ :to :,the .. ) Commissioner u may reasonably be necessary to enable the Stare agency or board: and:the ;: .. -Commissioner to perform their duties and that the public asency will maintain such records, J ncluding the records required under Section 437, and provide access to those records, as !he  St~te agency or board or the Commission~ deem necessary to pem,rm their dutic~ 5) . That the public agency will provide reasonable opportuniti~ for the participation QY ~e~ : parents, and other interested agencies, organizations, and individuals in the planning for an ;  : operation of each program;  6) ,That any application. evaluation, periodic program plan or report refating to each program : will be made readily available to parents and othet memben of t~c general public; 7) . That in the case of any project involving construction - A.) The project is not inconsistent with overall Staie plans for the construction of school facilities, and 6 . ,,, : PAGE 08/16 P.007\"81~ .j ., ! j. I  1 ; . i ! !:\u0026gt;Ul4'.:H:H 352 EQUITY PUPIL SERVICE TO: '3\"t~  / B) 1n developing plans f'or construction, due consideration will be given to excellence of   architecture and d~ign and to c:ompliance with standard~ prescribed by th1: Scc:~buy under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 in order to emure that fkcilitica ' ' construeted with the use ofFedcral funds are acc:!Ssiblc to and usable by individuals with disabilities; . . . I S) '.That the public: agency has adopted emctive procedures for acquirilli and disscmi~atirig to teachers and admmistrators participating in each prosram significant information from , cduational research, demonstrations, and .similar projects, and for adoptini where  I '  appropriate, promising educational p~cticcs developed chrough such projects; and 9) .: That none of the funds expended undc:r any applicable pYOgnm wtll be used to ' acquire equipment (Including computer software) in any inStance in which such acquisition results . , . _ir,i a direct financial benefit to any organization representing the interests of the purchasing ,.. :: entity or its employees or ~y affiliate of such an organization.  Notice of Required Actinn~ by tbe SEA . The SEA is required under Section 619 of IDEA 97 to pr~vide notice to public agencies of the foll,o~ing actions: Direct Services by the Seate .Educ:ttion Agcnty: The Arkansas Department cf Education (ADE), Speci~l Education.Unit has the responsibility to ensure that the provisions of a free appropriate public education (F APE) are met for eligible stud~s with disabilitie5, ages 3 - 21. Consistent with the provision! afJ4 Code ofFederal Regulations (CFR) 300.360, a State Education Agency (SEA) shall use the payments tlm othei:wiae would have been available to an LEA or to a State agency to provide special ed~cation arid r.cl~ scrvic:es directly to children with disabilities residing in the area served by that local agency, or for whom tha1 State agency is n:sponsiblc, if the SEA determines that the LEA or Stat~ agency - a. Hu not provided the infonnation needed to establish the eligibility of the agency undsr  Part B of lhe Act; . -~. Is unable to establish and maintain programs ofFAPE that meet the requirements of this , ',! I ; part; .. :c.  1s unable or unwilling robe consolidated with one or more LE.As in order to. establish and ; ,,'. ,; .; maintain the programs; or  , d. Has one or more children with disabilitiC$ who .can best be served by a regional or State program or service-delivery system designed t9 meet the needs of these childmi, 7 PAGE 10/16 P. 008-'e:. :, ., :J i I . , :: i , ;ii . r:: I . i i I ; ~: 1 ! 1r :l i 1:. i 1.JJ l I ... . !: .  EQUITY PUPIL SERVICE TO: 9\"1900254  ..: , ! , When It is brought to the attention of the ADE through: .  ai  The enforcement of a decision .from an Impartial Due Process Hearing; b.  A complaint invcstignrion under the Complain, Procedures of the State; . c: Compliance monitoring of a public s.gency; or ' .  ,: l A request from a parent or public; aicncy tha~ the SEA assume the responsibility for . Direct Services; , I . . '. th~:ADE, Special EducatiotrUnit will implement the following procedures before final action is ' tak;ai by the ADE to assume the provision of Direct Services to an eligible student(s) with ~'-, ~i~iliti~s, ages 3 - 21. 1.  The Associate Director for Special Education will: :  a; Provide written notice co the public ag~cy that the SEA ha.s re3$on to suspea t~t it is . not providing a free appropriate public education to an eligible student(s) with .  ; : , disabiliti.es. ages 3 - 21, on rhe basis of one or more of the conditions set forth in 34 CFR . 300.360    -:bl  State the sourcc(s) of the_ infonnatio~ that has led.the SEA to suspect that the district is . not providing a fu;c appropriate public erlucution for the student(s) in question. c. Appoint a Team to conduct an investigation onhe situ.stionfc;omplaint.  I ; ; l.  ,The Investigative Team will review the public agency's provision ofFAPE in light of the  ; 'conditions set forth in 34 CFR 300.360.  . . : 3 . . The Team will follow the procedures the ADE has ~opted for its Complaint Procedures of ' ; the, Slate, as provided for in 34 CFR 300.660  300.662. ; . :.; ; i . : . . . . : 4,:;1The.Team will provide a written report and submit it to the Associate Ditectot. S' .. iF'.ollowing receipt of the report. the Associate Director will notify the parties concerned as \u0026gt;to the findings of the !nvc.,tigative Temn.  6 . . : Showd sufficient _evidence exist -to demonstrate that the public agency is not providing F ~  as a result ofa condition in 34 CFR 300.360, the Associate Director \"'ill notify the puplic agency that the ADE. intends to take the neccasary 3teps to provide Direct Servi~c:s to an . '.. .eligible swdcnt(s) with disabilities, ages 3 -21, within the jurisdiction of the public'ageticy. 8 i :' PAGE 11/16 P.089\"1U\u0026lt;I ,i .i ; ! I .! . . . ! u~, ~ ~l~UU~ 10 ; ~~ OOlq~Ul3~L EQUITY PUPIL SERVICE J: -~1-2002 :nh1, ml'!= TQ:94900254 \"I . : r . . .. . ,. .   : r ., . , I : !; ~1 , . i 1. I I r,=- I :1 -,;   1! ' I_ l i \\ : ;: ,. ! r  1 :1 t J! ! l I I' 1'. ! '\"i' ;: ! ' ~ ~ .' ''. ; 7. ,The public agency will be provided notice that it h~ the opportunity for a hearing on this :matter before the State's chief e\u0026lt;.il.lcation official, (the Director of the AD), or his/her - ~~  ; \u0026amp;.  :To :avail itself of tM opportunity for a hearint on the proposed provision of Direct Services : by the APE, the Chief Administrative Official of the P\\Jblic Agency must $Ubmit a written request for a hearing to the Associate Director for Special E\u0026lt;iucation within 3 O days of notice or the proposed action by the ADE. - 9.  'Within ten (lO) busines; day.s ofretQpt by the Associllte Director afa written request by the ;-pilblic agency for a huring, the ADE Director will .set a mutually agreeable dtte, time and .location for the hearing and advise the Chief Administrative Official of the Public Age'rq of this in writing. 1 -: ' I .. _ ! . io. The ADE Director, or dcsignee, will consider the evidence presented by the Chief  Administrative Official of the Public Agi:ncy and the Associate Director for Special  'Education, or designee.    11. Within ten (10) business days af completion of the hearing. the ADE Director will submit :written findinss of fact, the decision and reasons fof the ruling with regard to the provision . ; -of:Pirect Services by the ADE. in compliance with 34 CFR 300,360. ; 12. lfthe AD. determines that its action v,,ag contrary to state or fodE:ral statutes or regul:itions '.t~at govern the applicable program, the ADE shall rescind its action . . ! . : .. J'.3. Public agencies will be notitied of their right to ap.peal a decision of the ADe Director to - ;~h~old IDEA- Part B funds to \\he Secretary ofqjucation, U.S. Departm\u0026lt;:nt of'Education. 14. The public age,cy must file a notice oFthe appeal wtth the Secretary wi\\hin 20 days after the : :public agency has been ~otitied by the ADE Director of the tinaf decision of the hearing. - 1.S. 1)lc .Associate Diraotor fbr Special Education will advise the Administrator, Grants ~f!d Dara )vfanagement, in writing as to when to witlihold and when to restore IDEA -! P~ B payments to che Public Agency. ; ! t ' ' I : WhJ ~~ ADE has det~ncd that it will assu~ rhe provision of Direct Services tci ensure F APE,. the A.OE may provide special education and related scr.-ices in sucll a manner and at !Uch lo~ons (including, regional or State centers) as the ADE consideTS appropriate.  i . Public Agency Compliance: If the SEA, in accord~ with 3 4 CTR 300: 197, after reasonable ~ notide .and an opportunity. fer a hearing; finds that a public agency that na.s been determined to , I '  I 9 ' ' l '  . '. PAGE 12/16 ~ .~ld'IOl\"' I  ,. 'i :j i :, ,, . _p3t 21/ 2002 10:33 5014901352 ~;-21-2002 : 10: i 7. FROM:  EQUITY PUPIL SERVICE T0:9'\\900aS4 ' j -   , I .  i .. l;,e-digi1\u0026gt;1e under mis :scdion ~ Awl1J to com9ly 'Mth acy reqwremem d~ed in 34 cat. 300:220 -300.250, the SEA shall reduce orma:y -not ~de any iiu1her psyments to the LEA or: stz1e ageney utd tho SEA is satl!ilcd that lhe eublic agency is complying w\\th that \\ ~~  ~ p-.i,lic agency in re.a:ipt o a notice desc:n'bcd in the first pan.graph of this section shall. by ,m~ of public~ take the mea.ues necessary to~ the pe:11de:'D)' of an action punmnt w this ~on to ~ \u0026amp;ttcntion of the publle within 1he jurisdiction of~~- -~ ~ out its funaion undet this secticn, each SEA shall co~dcr urt decisiOll resu11inl fi'om a hearing \"l,Illde:-34 CF.R. 300.S07 - 300.52\u0026amp; that is adverse ta the pubiie agem;y involnd iD'tbc ~sioca. ~cies 'Will ~c ~t othia infonnariOG by i.ignu,1 pa\u0026amp;e 10  . . .  I .  :. _m'ITfICATION . I,, ,:mt UNDERSIGNED A'U'l11ORl'ZED lW'RiS!:NTATlV?, RDOY CERTll\"Y UL\\T THE APPUCANT ACENCY,S GOVERNING BODY JIAS ~OPTE~ THE ,'BOV:t ASSURANCES AND lS Aw All or u.QU!.R.!l\u0026gt; ACIIOl\"iS )Y nm SEA . UUTIVE TO DIRECT SERVICES AND POBUC J\\GENCY COMPLIANO. '. :_ .. . ~ : . .' ; ?l'tith-Little a:d. Sdl:Xll ~ \"-nd~a.d.yQuldlXd~ i.f -~  '  ; ~ '.  ! :  !\" : . i ' ; :. \\ '. . ~ t  ~! -~ . ~  . . .  I  j 10 PAGE 13/16 I-' .16l.l'112l. .. ' ' t EQUITY PUPIL SERVICE TO:~ Au.dlo~oo l:ctu\u0026amp;;atiou Sen-ice ooperaeive ~ Chilclhoo4-Spctjal Edua\u0026amp;n  2001~ ~oo, Y~ . ~ ~ol districts ~ below hn-c established an ~emo:Ji urviee c:oopcratiw  a\\:!mmistra.tive mangemem flit 1hc purpose or providhla =arJy r;hildhood spc:cial cducatiai services in accordance widi Ark. Code AM. 6-41-~ and Section cSl 9 ot'mt IDEA 97. The ; ~e of this coopcr.mve is: ' '  'lt\\-otstnct .k1Y ~ Little a:a: I.EA.Number Supcrin~d=t's Signature l!tx1h LiC:la lt)dC ~ , 1 . School District : LEA# Sc:hool ])istrict LE.All Superlnt;ndcnt's Signature  Su~cniicut s Sign~  ,.   School Disuict LEA# School District LEAi Superilltcndcnt', Si~ Superiutcndent' s SignDJre.  :: 1  School Dinrict I .i  , , ; :, .,, LE.A.# .,  .  I . Superintendeat's ~ - .. '' ;  'School District I.EA# School District LEA# ; ' I  48 PAGE 14/16 P.012\"014 .I, .:' F I ;i ! ., . ' ' ! EQUITY PUPIL SERVICE T0:9'1900254 Authoriation . Ednca.tiOJl Senicc C-oop~tive E:nly ChilAood Sp,dal 1?:duc:i.1io~ 2001~2 School Y c:iT   The scl\\ocl districts listed 1,elow have established u educatioa service c:aoperadve . ..  ~e ammgement fonbe purpose o!providmg early childhood specai ~an '  ::: StJ'Yic:siaacariaDcc with Ark. Code Ann. 6-41-220 and Sccticn619 otlaeIDEA97. :tnc: ' ~ ~this COQye:iative is:  . .  'B:l.-ciec:ril%. ! QJ:i.lthm ~ Little lb:!( exi:z ., , Cooperative . 11ie sigr.atum bel0w verify !his arrangement 1M mtborize \\he above named coo~ to use . : : : funds a:pproprlllted by kt 1392 of 1999 to help provide services to three through nve 'fe3r old  ( i:bildd~isab-ilities.  .:;_~ ' ; '  . Si.penmen  s Signature Su~deu't' 1 Signattn .- :~9?Jl:'i 8)-03  Schoel District Soperintendem' a Signature .. . : I ; . lEAi . 1. : I.EA# .. , .... __________ _ Saperinttndeat'i Signature '! .  .,! .I;.._. - '-----,---- -~-- .,  , ,  Scllool Distiict LEA I  i . : Sc.~ool District LEA,# ,a School D~trict School District Supetiattndent' $ Signatite School District LEA :;, Superin~s SignatuR School District LEA. ,. I . ,. ' ,,I ' i EG!U11Y PUPIL SERVICE T0:~90025-4  Authorizatioa Educado11 Senice Cocp~tive bdy Owdhood Special Edutatio lOOI-G? School Year Th:\u0026amp; ~chool districts listed below haw eatabtisbcd m educatioa. iemce eoopermve . , ., - nistrative aaangeaicmfor1he purpose of-providing early childhood special edu.ciltioti sctvictt in accordance with Ark. Code Aim. 641-220 and Section 619 of the IDEA 97. ne name af1his eoopendiVe is: ,: I 'lri~ ?arly ~ ~ Y' tt''! );xx O:,oper.dive B\u0026gt;:02 LEANambl:r The si~ below verify this arrangement a:id authorize the above :named cooperative 10 use fun~ appropriated by Al:t 1392 of 1999 to hclp provide secvi~ to 'three through five year old (?hild~ with dist   I -'i  . './ ~  I ~ bx ED-01. School Dutrict . LEA# ': ' f .Superintendent's Signatutt  ' I LEA# Superintendent's Signaiure School District LEA# ;i I ,' '  1 : S11perinteo.d.el1t'1 s~ LEA# r i i . I  i ; ' . Supcrin~cndent's Sign\u0026amp;IUre School District I.EA# Superintendent's. sign~ School Di3aic:  LEA# School Dutrict ' LEA# Sup~e:nt's Sjgnatun, School :Oisaict , , ., PAGE 16/16 j\" ;  ' i ! VVr 1\u0026lt;.Vr V...L AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT AND THE STA TE OF ARKANSAS Ths Agreement is by and between the Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\"), and the State of Arkansas (the \"State\"), by and through the State Board ofEducation, the Arkansas Department of Education and Governor Mike Huckabee. LRSD and the State shall collectively be referred to as . the Parties. REC1TALS WHEREAS, LRSD and the State are parties to the 1989 Settlement Agreement in the Pulaski County School Desegregation Case, U.S.D.C. No. CIV-LR-82-866, (\"1989 Settlement Agreement\"); WHEREAS, the 1989 Settlement Agreement imposes certain obligations on the State but contains no provision stating when those obligations end; WHEREAS, LRSD will seek to be declared unitary and released from federal court monitoring and supervision but is concerned that if it is declared unitary the State may seek to tenninate its obligations under the 1989 Settlement Agreement; WHEREAS, pursuant to Section VI.B. of the 1989 Settlement Agreement, the State has advanced loans to the LRSD in the cumulative principal amount of$20,000,000.00 (twenty million dollars), and there is presently a dispute between the State and the LRSD as to whether those loans will be forgive~ or must be repaid pursuant to Section VI.B.(6) of the 1989 Settlement Agreement; WHEREAS, under the State's current funding formula for public school districts, LRSD's per pupil revenue affects the total amount of funding which the State must distribute through the formula; WHEREAS, how LRSD structures its bond debt affects tRSD's per pupil revenue; Page I of 8 -,i EXHIBIT 3 VO/ 701 U..L .l.D.L1 .J..U . LlO rrt.A WHEREAS, the State wants LRSD to structure its bond debt so as to minimize the financial impact on the State; WHEREFORE, the Parties hereby agree to the following terms and conditions: AGREEMENTS I. LRSD agrees to pursue complete unitary status and release from court supervision, in good faith and using its best efforts, until such complete relief has been obtained or until the termination of this Agreement, whichever comes first. 2. LRSD agrees to accelerate the sale of its bonds so that the required annual debt service payments will be 11 .8 million dollars beginning with the 2002 calendar year. The State Board of Education does hereby approve the LRSD's bond application as submitted on February 19, 2001. 3. In order to facilitate and encourage LRSD's efforts to attain complete unitary status and - release from court supervision. the State agrees that it will not seelc to modify or terminate any of the State's obligations to the LRSD under the 1989 Settlement Agreement (including any reduction of the payments to LRSD resulting from the Settlement Agreement or court decisions enforcing the Agreement) from the date of execution of this Agreement up to and including June 1, 2008. This covenant shall remain in full force and effect (unless this Agreement terminates pursuant to paragraph 6 of this Agreement) regardless of whether the LRSD, the Pulaski County Special School District, and/or the North Little Rock School District obtain partial or complete unitary status and release from court supervision. 3. I Provided, however, that this Agreement does not limit, and should not be construed or interpreted as limiting in any way, the State's ability to seek modification or  termination of any of its obligations under the 1989 Settlement Agreement (including Page 2 of 8 ~UUJ court decisions interpreting the Agreement) that relate exclusively to the North Little Rock School District, the Pulaski County Special School District, or any other party to the action. Further, this Agreement does not prohibit the State and the LRSD from jointly petitioning the court for modification or tennination of any aspect of the 1989 Settlement Agreement, nor does it prohibit the State from asserting any and all defenses it may otherwise assert in response to any motion or allegation of the LRSD to the effect that the State has violated the 1989 Settlement Agreement. 3 .2 The State agrees to cooperate with and assist LRSD in opposing any challenge to the legality of this Agreement or any effort by a third-party to modify or tenninate the States' s obligations under the 1989 Settlement Agreement. Such cooperation and assistance shall include, but not be limited to, any or all of the following: (I) filing joint pleadings supporting the legality of this Agreement; (2) filing joint pleadings responding to any request to modify or terminate the State's obligations under the 1989 Settlement Agreement; (3) filing a joint appeal of any order, decision or judgment which directly or indirectly undennines this Agreement; (4) filing a joint brief opposing any appeal of an order, decision or judgment upholding this Agreement or refusing to modify or terminate the 1989 Settlement Agreement; and (5) filing joint pleadings to remove or transfer any chaUenge to the legality of this Agreement to United States District Court and to consolidate the challenge with the Pulaski County School Desegregation Case, U.S.D.C. No. CIV-LR-82-866. 4. In recognition of the LRSD's efforts to obtain unitary status and complete release from federal court supervision, and to facilitate the success of the LRSD's efforts, the State and the LRSD agree Page 3 of 8 1.1:!JVV't U!\u0026gt; / ~0/U.l lllLI J. 0 . '10 r JU. as follows: 4.1 The State will forgive and release the LRSD from any obligation to repay the first $15,000,000.00 (fifteen million dollars) in loans advanced to the LRSD pursuant to Section VI.B. of the 1989 Settlement Agreement. Any and all funds in the joint escrow account estabfo;hed by the State and the LRSD pursuant to Section Vl.B of the J 989 Settlement Agreement will be released to the LRSD as soon as practicable. 4.2 In addition, with respect to the remaining $5,000,000.00 (five million dollars) in loans advanced to the LRSD pursuant to Section VI.B. of the 1989 Settlement Agreement, the State will forgive and release the LRSD from any obligation to repay these loans if the LRSD obtains a final order granting it complete unitary status and release from federal court supervision on or before July 1, 2004. Subject to the provisions of paragraph 4.3 of this Agreement, the LRSD is relieved of its obligation to make payments of principal or interest on these loans into a joint escrow account established by the State and the LRSD pursuant to Section VI.B of the 1989 Settlement Agreement. 4.3 For purposes of paragraph 4.2, the phrase \"final order granting it complete unitary status and release from federal court supervision\" shall mean the entry of a final, appealable order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas granting the LRSD complete unitary status and release from federal court supervision as of July 1, 2004. In the event an order granting the LRSD complete - unitary status and release from federal court supervision ~ of July I, 2004 is not entered by the District Court, or is entered by the District Court but is appealed and Page 4 of 8 ~vvu subsequently reversed in whole or in part, the LRSD shall have the unconditional obligation to repay the loans referenced in paragraph 4.2 on a payment schedule of . interest and principal as set forth in Sections VI.B(l) and (3) of the 1989 Settlement Agreement, and to immediately pay to the State the cumulative amount of any and all interest and principal payments that would have been due on the loans referenced in paragraph 4.2. 4.4 The Parties shall promptly and jointly petition the Court for any modification of Section VI.B. of the 1989 Settlement Agreement that is necessary so as to fully effectuate and make binding the terms of paragraphs 4 through 4 .3 of this Agreement, and shall take such further action as may be necessary to obtain such a modification, including but not limited to appealing any adverse decision or ruling of the District Court. 4.5 In the event th.is Agreement is terminated pursuant to paragraph 6 of this Agreement, the Parties shaJI negotiate in good faith in an effort to arrive at a mutually agreeable resolution of any disputes concerning the loans advanced to the LRSD pursuant to Section VI .B of the 1989 Settlement Agreement. In the event the Parties cannot agree to such a resolution, the Parties may take whatever action they deem necessary and appropriate with regard to said loans, including but not limited to seeking appropriate relief from the Court. In the event such relief is sought from the tourt, neither the terms of this Agreement, nor any facts or statements of the parties related to its negotiation or execution, shall be construed or offered as evidence of any admission against interest or waiver of any kind on the part of the State or the LRSD. Page S of 8 4.6 However, in the event this entire Agreement is not terminated pursuant to paragraph 6 of this Agreement, hut the Court approval referenced in paragraph 4.4 of this Agreement is nonetheless not obtained, the provisions of paragraphs 4 through 4.6 of this Agreement shall be null and void but severable from the remainder of this Agreement, to the effect that all other promises and obligations of the Parties shall remain in fu)] force and effect. In such an event, the Parties shalf negotiate in good faith in an effort to arrive at a mutually agreeable resolution of any disputes concerning the loans advanced to the LRSD pursuant to Section VI.B of the 1989 Settlement Agreement and, in the event the Parties cannot agree to such a resolution, the Parties may take whatever action they deem necessary and appropriate with regard to said loans, including but not limited to seeking appropriate relief from the Court. In the event stJch relief is sought from the Court, neither the terms of this Agreement, nor any facts or statements of the Parties related to its negotiation or execution, shall be construed or offered as evidence of any admission against interest or waiver of any kind on the part of the State or the LRSD. 5. The effective date of this Agreement shall be the date of execution. 6. This Agreement will terminate and the State will have no further obligations under this Agreement if the LRSD has failed to apply to the District Court for complete unitary status and release from court supervision by June 30, 2004. 7. The Parties agree that this Agreement shall be filed in the Pulaski County School Desegregation Case, U.S.D.C. No. CIV-LR-82-866, and that the United States District Court shall have jurisdiction to enforce this Agreement, to resolve disputes between the Parties arising out of this Page 6 of 8 U~/ZG/U1 lHU 10:4/ t'AA - Agreement and to hear any challenge to the legality of this Agreement. 8. This Agreement expresses the entire agreement of the parties and may not be modified or altered except by a writing executed by the authorized representatives of the LRSD and the State. It is specifically contemplated that this Agreement may be modified or amended, with the approval of the LRSD and the State, after further consultation and discussion with the Joshua Intervenors. 9. AJ1 covenants, conditions, agreements and undertakings contained herein shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the respective legal successors in interest and assigns of the parties. 10. This Agreement is entered into as of the '6ay of March, 2001, by the undersigned officers of the Little Rock School District and the Arkansas Department of Education, each of whom is authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Parties. Page 7 of 8 ~vvo UtS / l!l / Ul. 1.11LI .to : \u0026lt;11 rft.A ~vvo UTILE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION H:lliligatioo~uget\\A,bi,su AG - Oacglmi\u0026gt;cll_lS_OI \u0026gt;8\"ffll'Lwpd Page 8 of 8 HERSCHEL H. FRIDAY 1192219941 Wll.LIAM H. SUTTON , P. A . BYRON M . EI SEMAN, JR . . P. A . JOE O BELL . P. A . JAMES A BUTTRY , P. A . - EOERICK S . URSERY , P. A . CARE . DAVIS . JR . . P. A . M ES C . ClARK , JR. P. A . ,HO MA$ P. LEGGETT , P. A . JOHN DEWEY WATSO N, P. A\". PAUi. B BEN HAM 111 , P. A . LARRY W BURKS , PA. A WYCKLIFF NISBET , JR, P. A . JAMES EDWARD HARR I S, P. A . J PHIi.LiP MALCOM . P.A JAMES M SIMPSON , P. A . JAMES M SAXTON . P. A . J SHEPHERD RUSSELL 111 , P. A . DO NALD H. BACON , P. A . WILllAM THOMAS BAXTER. P.A BARRY E COPLI N, P.A RICHARDO TAYLOR. P.A JOS EPH 8 HURST . J R. , P. A . ELIZABETH ROBBEN MURRAY . PA Ci, F41STOPHER HEL LER . PA LAURA HENSI.EY SMITH . PA ROBERT S. SHAFER . P. A . WILLIAM M GRI FFIN 111 , P. A . MI CHAEi. S. MOORE , P. A . QlANE S. MACKEY . P. A . WALTER M EBEL 111, PA . KEVIN A CRASS, PA WILLIAM A WA00Ell. JR . PA see n J l ,),NCASTER , p A M GAYLE CORLEY . PA . ROBEAT 8 BEACH , JR . P.A J LEE 9ROWN . PA ,i.:.. ME S C BAKER . JR PA H.:.RRY A llCHT , P.A FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP ATTORNE YS AT LAW 2000 REGIONS CENTER 400 WEST CAPITOL LITTLE ROCK , ARKANSAS 72201 -3493 TELEPHONE 501 - 376 -2011 FAX NO. 501 -376 -2147 June 5, 2000 Mr. Timothy G. Gauger Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock , AR 72201 Re: Magnet Schools Memorandum of Understanding Dear Tim: SCOTT H. TUCKER, P. A. GUY Al TON WADE . P. A . PRICE C. GARONER. P. A. TONIA P. JONES , P. A . DAVID 0 . WILSON, P. A. JEFFREY H. MOORE, P. A . DAVID M . GRAF, P. A . CARLA GUNNELS SPAINHOUR, P. A . JOHN C. FENDLEY , JR. , P.A. JOHANN CONIGLIO FLEISCHAUER, P. A . R. CHRISTOPHER LAWSON . P. A. GREGORY O. TAYLOR, P. A . TONY L. WILCOX , P. A . FRANC. HICKMAN , P. A . BETTY J. DEMORY. P. A . LYNDA M . JOHNSON, P. A . JAMES W . SMITH CLIFFORD W . PLUNKETT OANIEL l. HERRINGTON IC. COLEMAN WESTBROOK , J R. ALLISON J . CORNWELL ELLEN M . OWENS HELENE N. RAYOER JASON B. HENDREN BRUCE B. TIDWELL CHRIS A . AVERITT KELLY MURPHY MCQUEEN JOSEPH P. MCKAY ALEXANDRA A. IFRAH JAY T. TAYLOR MARTIN A , KASTEN BRYAN W. DUKE JOSEPH G. NICHOLS ROBERT T. SMITH o, COUNSll 8 . S. CLARK WILLIAM l. TERRY WILLIAM l. PAT TO N , JR . H. T . LARZELERE . P. A . JOHN C. ECHOLS, P. A . Wlllf(lll'S OIIIUCT NO. 150 11 370 - 1506 I have enclosed what I hope to be a final draft Memorandum of Understanding regarding the Magnet Schools. draft incorporates your proposed \"insert A.\" Please let me of a This know whether this draft meets with your client's approval. CJH/bk Encl osure ... EXHIBIT 4 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WHEREAS, Section II.E of the Pulaski County School Desegregation Case Settlement Agreement (as revised September 28, 1989) (hereinafter the \"Settlement Agreement\") between the Little Rock School District ( \"LRSD\") and the State of Arkansas provides that the State of Arkansas, acting primarily through the Arkansas Department of Education (\"ADE\") will continue to pay its share of the Magnet School operational costs and transportation costs for the six original magnet schools (Carver, Williams, Gibbs, Booker, Mann and Parkview); and WHEREAS, Section II .D of the Settlement Agreement limits the State's magnet funding obligation so that the State is required to provide magnet funding only to the original six magnet schools; and WHEREAS, the total seating capacity for the six original magnet schools in 1989 was 4 ,065 seats; and WHEREAS, Section II.D of the Settlement Agreement can be read as limiting the State's total magnet funding obligation to 4,065 seats or as limiting the State's magnet funding obligation on a school-by-school basis to the 1989 capacity at each of the six original magnet schools; and WHEREAS, pursuant to its Revised Desegregation and Education Plan, LRSD reorganized its schools into a new configuration which includes middle schools; and WHEREAS, the Magnet Review Committee requested and won the District Court's approval to change the grade structure of the interdistrict magnet schools and the number of seats within five of the six schools; and WHEREAS, a consequence of LRSD' s change to the middle school configuration is that some of the six original magnet schools have a greater capacity than they did at the time of the 1989 Settlement Agreement and some of those schools have a smaller capacity than they did at the time of the 1989 Settlement Agreement; and WHEREAS, ADE has filed an objection with the District Court, in which it asserts that the State's magnet school funding obligations are limited, on a school-by-school basis, to its share of funding for students up to the 1989 seating capacity at each of the six original magnet schools; and WHEREAS, LRSD has filed a motion with the Court requesting , among other things, that the Settlement Agreement be modified so as to increase the State's magnet school funding obligation beyond its share of funding for a total of 4,065 students for all six original magnet schools; in the alternative, LRSD's motion requested that the Settlement Agreement be modified so as to increase the number of magnet seats funded by the State for certain individual magnet schools; and WHEREAS, the LRSD and the State wish to amicably resolve their differences concerning the effect of LRSD' s restructuring on the State's obligation to fund the six original magnet schools. THEREFORE, it is understood and agreed between ADE (on behalf of the State) and the LRSD as follows: LRSD shall withdraw its motion to modify the Settlement Agreement to the extent it seeks an increase, beyond a total of 4,065 seats, of the State's obligation to fund the six original magnet schools, and LRSD will not take an appeal from the District Court's order denying its motion to so increase the State's obligation . ADE shall withdraw its objection to District Court approval of a change in the number of seats proportionately funded by ADE at 5 of the 6 original magnet schools, provided that ADE will not be required to fund more than a total of 4,065 seats for all 6 original magnet schools collectively. The withdrawal of LRSD's and ADE's motions and objections is based upon their agreement that the restructuring of the LRSD's schools was intended, as part of LRSD's Revised Desegregation Plan, to enhance the quality of education in the LRSD and was not instituted solely as a means to increase the State's magnet school funding obligations. Nothing in this agreement should be construed, interpreted or asserted as a waiver of LRSD's or the ADE's ability to seek future modifications of the Settlement Agreement in regards to the seating capacities or funding of the magnet schools, or the LRSD's or ADE's right to object to proposed changes in seating capacities or funding obligations for the magnet schools, based upon factors other than the LRSD's restructuring of its schools under its Revised Desegregation Plan. Executed this __ day of June, 2000. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION By: ______________ _ Tim Gauger, Its Attorney LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT By: ______________ _ Christopher Heller 2  AGREEMENT BETWEEN LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT AND KNIGHT INTERVENORS RELATED TO THE TEACHER RETIREMENT AND HEAL TH INSURANCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement (the \"Agreement\") is made and entered into on this 6th day of February, 1999 between the Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") and the Knight Intervenors (\"Knight\"). WHEREAS, LRSD and the Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association (\"LRCT A\"), which is represented in this case by Knight, previously agreed that the amount of the teacher pay increase for the 1998-99 school year would be related to the amount of damages recovered by LRSD from the State of Arkansas on its teacher retirement and health insurance claims; and WHEREAS, LRSD, Knight and the other Parties to the Pulaski County School Desegregation case are expected to agree to a settlement of LRSD' s teacher retirement and health insurance claims which will result in an award to LRSD of an amount less than the full amount of its claims, which agreement and result is material to the validity of this Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED: 1. That Knight agrees that LRSD teachers shall receive a 4.25% base pay increase for the 1998-99 school year and that this Agreement supersedes and replaces the following two provisions of the original agreement between LRSD and its teachers with regard to an increase in base pay for the 1998-99 school year: First, the language concerning distribution of a remedy in excess of LRSD's actual cost for teacher retirement and health insurance (paragraph 4 of the original Agreement); and second, the 4.5% base pay provision. 2. That this Agreement may not be altered or modified except by written instrument executed by both Parties; and, EXHIBIT i 5 .f - - - - -- ' 3. That the Parties have authorized their respective attorneys to execute this Agreement on their behalf. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement this 6th day of February, 1999. Richard Roachell Attorney for Knight Intervenors AGREEMENT AMONG LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, JOSHUA INTERVENORS AND KNIGHT INTERVENORS REGARDING TEACHER RETIREMENT AND HEAL TH INSURANCE This Agreement among Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\"), Pulaski County Special School District (\"PCSDD\"), North Little Rock School District (NLRSD), Joshua lntervenors (\"Joshua\") and Knight Intervenors (\"Knight\") regarding teacher retirement and health insurance remedy (the \"Agreement\") is made and entered into on this th day of February, 1999. LRSD, PCSSD, NLRSD, Joshua, and Knight shall be collectively referred to as the \"Parties.\" LRSD, PCSSD and NLRSD shall be collectively referred to as the \"Districts.\" WHEREAS, the Parties disagree as to the correct method for calculating the three Pulaski County school districts' damages for the State of Arkansas' violation of the 1989 Settlement Agreement with regard to the teacher retirement and health insurance programs; and, WHEREAS, the Parties have determined that it is in the best interest of all of the Parties to reach a voluntary settlement of their disagreement; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED: 1. That the Districts' collective damages for the State of Arkansas' violation of the 1989 Settlement Agreement with regard to the teacher retirement and health insurance programs shall be calculated pursuant to the methodology proposed by ADE as set forth in Court's Exhibit 504; 2. That the Parties shall submit to the Court within five (5) days of this Agreement final numbers for the 1996-97 and 1997-98 school years from which the Districts damages may be calculated using the methodology proposed by ADE as set forth in Court's Exhibit 504. The State should be ordered to pay those damages within fourteen days of this Agreement; 3. The State should be ordered to reimburse the district in future years on the same ..  EXHIBIT / i 0 a: - monthly schedule as equalization funding using prior year average participation numbers and current year State minimum required contribution numbers, with adjustments to be made in January and June based on current year actual participation numbers. The State should be ordered to make payments for the 1998-99 school year, within thirty days of this Agreement, as necessary to bring it into compliance with this paragraph. 4. That the total amount of damages for the Districts as calculated according to the methodology set forth in court's Exhibit 504 shall be distributed each year as follows: 60% to LRSD, 30% to PCSSD and I 0% to NLRSD; 5. That the amounts received by each district pursuant to paragraph 3 above shall be regarded as the actual amount of each district's teacher retirement and health insurance remedy. 6. This Settlement Agreement does not resolve the question of whether the State should be required to pay the districts 100% of each district's costs for teacher retirement and health insurance or the average percentage of actual costs received by other school districts in the State. That issue is ripe for adjudication by the Court. 7. That LRSD and PCS SD have entered into a separate agreement related to the Pooling Agreement and challenges to the Act 917 funding system which, in part, serves as consideration for this Agreement; 8. That LRSD and Knight have entered into a separate agreement related to teacher pay which, in part, serves as consideration for this Agreement. 9. That this Agreement may not be altered or modified except by written instrument executed by all Parties; and, 2 --------- I 0. That the Parties have authorized their respective attorneys to execute this Agreement on their behalf IN W1TNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement this 8th day of February, 1999. st~eJones A)~ Attorney for NLRSD 3 Richard Roachell Attorney for Knight  SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Trus Settlement Agreement (the \"Agreement\") is made and entered into on this 911t day of February, 1999, by and between the Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") and the Pulaski County Special School District (\"PCSSD\"). WHEREAS, LRSD and PCSSD disagree as to the correct method for calculating the three Pulaski County school districts' damages for the State of Arkansas' violation of the 1989 Settlement Agreement with regard to the teacher retirement and health insurance programs; WHEREAS, the district court's interpretation of the Pooling Agreement will likely result in a substantial payment by LRSD to PCSSD; WHEREAS, PCSSD may pursue damages from the State of Arkansas for additional violations of the 1989 Settlement Agreement resulting from the State's change from the Act 34 - funding system to the Act 917 funding system, pursuant to the methodology utilized in PCSSD's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement as Regards MFPA filed September 8, 1998; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED: 1. That this Agreement constitutes consideration, in part, for the settlement agreement entered on this same date concerning the districts' damages for the State of Arkansas' violation of the 1989 Settlement Agreement with regard to the teacher retirement and health insurance programs; 2. That LRSD's liability to PCSSD under the district court 's interpretation of the Pooling Agreement shall be capped at $450,000.00 for the 1998-99 school year and that neither district's liability to the other will exceed $400,000.00 per year for all subsequent years that the Pooling Agreement is in effect; 3. That LRSD shall receive 30% of PCSSD's damages recovered from the State of - Arkansas for additional violations of the 1989 Settlement Agreement resulting from the State's EXHIBIT 7 - change from the Act 34 funding system to the Act 91 7 funding system pursuant to the methodology utilized in PCSSD's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement as Regards MFPA filed September 8, 1998. 4. However, in no event shall PCSSD's damages paid to LRSD pursuant to Paragraph 4 above exceed that amount of LRSD's loss in teacher retirement and health insurance damages resulting from the settlement agreement entered on this same date concerning the districts' damages for the State of Arkansas ' violation of the 1989 Settlement Agreement with regard to the teacher retirement and health insurance programs; 5. That this Agreement may not be altered or modified except by written instrument executed by both Parties; and, 6. That the Parties have authorized their respective attorneys to execute this Agreement on their behalf IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement this 9th day of February, 1999. 2 I I I I I I ,, I I I I I I HU18CHll N. F\"tOAT Ct82Zlt WILLIAM N. SUTTON. P.A . JAMES 1lf . MOOIIE IYaON M . US(MAN. Jfl . ,.A. JO( O. 8(LL. r . A . JOHN C. (CHOLS. r . A . JAM[S A . IUTTPtY. ,. . A . Ffl(OUUCI . UJHUIY. , .A. OSCAa ( . DAVIS. JII .  f'.A. JAM(S C . ClAtlf; . Jfl . , . A. THOMAS P. LEGGETT. P. A. JOHN O[W(Y WATSON. P. A. PAUL a. l(NHAM Ill . P.A . LAJUIY W . IUfllS . P . A . A . WYCltllFF NISl(T, Jlll., r . A. JAMES EDWAlliO HAIIIIIS , P. A.. J . ,HILUP MALCOM, r .A. JAM[I M . ltMrSON, P . A . JAMES M . SAXTON, P .A. J . IHlrHUID flUIS(ll IU, P . A . OONALO H. IACON, P . A . WILLIAM THOMAS IAXT[II, r . A. IAIIIIY ( , COPLIN, P\".A. IIICHAJIO D. TAYLOII, , . A. JOS[P'H I. HUtllT, Jll ,, P.A. [UZAIETH flOll(N MUIUIAY, P .A . CHIIISTOPH(II HU. LUI , P .A. LAU\"A HENSLEY SMITH , l\" . A. ltOl(IIT S . SHAF[II, P.A. WILi.i.AM M . GJUFFfN Ill. , . A . MICHA(l S . MOOft(, ,. . A. DIAN( S . MA.Cl[Y , , . A . WALT(ft M . (au Ill , .. . ... . l(VIN 4 . CIIASS , P' . A. WtlllAM A . WADO(Ll, Jft . , r .A . John W. Walker FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLA!tK A PARTNERSHIP OF INDIVIDUALS ANO PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2000 FIRST COMMERCIAL BUILDING 400 WEST CAPITOL LITTLE ROCIC, ARKANSAS 722013493 TELEPHONE 601 - 3782011 FAX NO. 601-378-2147 June 10, 1998 VIA FAX and HAND DELIVERY JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Street Little Rock, AR 72206 Re: Attorney's Fee Settlement Dear John: SCOfT J . LANCASH  . \" \"  M . OAYl( COIIIUY. r .A oauu I . l(ACH. Jlt . . ,  . J . U( ... OWN , f' . A. JAM(S C . 1141(11. J . P' . A HARRY A . UGHT . , .A . SCOTT N. lUCC(III . r . A . .JOHN ClA'flON \"ANDOll'\" P'  CUT Al TON WAO(. P .   f'l1UC( C . CA110Nl . ,.  TONIA,. JON(S. ,. A . DAVID 0. WUSON. P . A . J(FFlll('f H . MOOU. r  0AYID M . GIIAJ. P . A . CAllllA GUNN(lS S,-AINHOUfl. ,. A .IOHH C. IF(NOl(T . J . . PA . II. CMllll  TOl\"N(III LAWSON Cll(GO\"'f 0. fA'flO\" TONY L. WILCOX FIIAN C. NIClMAN l(TT'f J . 0(W0fl'f  .... A .. A J . ...... o l 'fNOA W. JONNSON JAM($ W . SMITH CllFFOO W . l'lUNl( ff OAHtll l. M(flllllNC:fON ALLISON .J . COIUtW(LL 1000  cu (LUN lot . OW(NS H(l(N( N . ATOUI .JASON I . N(NDA(N SUSANN. CHILDUIS IIIIUC[ a . TIOWUl o, covu WllLIAM J . SMITH a . S . CLAIU WILLIAM L. HT WILLIAM l. ,-AT TON. J H . 1' . lAllll[UR( . , . A . 16011 370 I 601 I will have delivered to you today a check from the Little Rock School District in the amount of $35,000.00 for attorney's fees in the school desegregation case. We have now paid you $100,000.00 based upon our expectation that we will be able to reach a complete agreement concerning past and future fees and costs in the desegregation case. In accordance with our telephone conversation today, we now have such an agreement subject to the approval of the Little Rock School District Board of Directors. I expect the Board of Directors to approve our agreement at its June meeting. LRSD will make the following payments for past fees and costs: $100,000.00 on or before June 30, 1998; $100,000.00 on or before August 31, 1998; and $500,000.00 on or before October 31, 1998. U or fees and costs incurred for implementing and monitoring the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan, LRSD will reimburse your firm up to $48,333.33 per year for three years beginning July 1,1,a---, 1998. - The payments described in this letter will constitute full anc complete payment in satisfaction of all past or future claims for attorney's fees and costs except as specifically set forth in the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan. Please sign this letter l:iCI ::z: 00 \u0026gt;\u0026lt; Ill 1 It I I I I I I ,I I I I I - It I I John w. Walker June 10, 1998 Page 2 to indicate your acceptance of these terms and your willingness to sign a comprehensive settlement agreement containing these terms. Thank you for your cooperation. I will keep you advised of the progress toward approval of this agreement by the LRSD Board of Directors. The Joshua Intervenors agree to the settlement terms set forth in this letter. rney A PROF\"\":.SSIO~Al. CORPORATI0:-1 :\\TTOR..'-'EYS\"AT L~W 120J '\\J:.'CRTI;EN aANlC Bl,'U..OL'-:G LITi1..E Rea:. ARKANSAS 72201 (501) 314-7100 -:-a.E:c::rl' CX'IJ n~l\u0026amp;ll :!ay 31, 1989 ~e: ~ittle ~eek School Dist=ict vs. Pulaski C~unty S?ecial School District No. 1, et al, NO. LR-C-82-866 John W. Walker, Escr. Christopher Heller; Esq. Ste?hen W. Jones, Esq. M. Sa~uel Jones, Esq. ~ic~ard W. Roachell, Esq. Dear Counsel: In_ accorc.ance wi t:1 III.A. o:f the ?ulas}~i County Deseq:::-ega tion Settlenent .::..greement c-f .Ma::::-ch, l 9 8 9, we are enclosing an Arkansas DeDartment of Education ?12.n fer ~c~i toring i!uplementation of compensc.to~y educ2. t.ic:1 ~n t.he ~tree school c.istricts. The settleme!\"lt 2gree;:1e!lt does not !)rov:i.Ce :\"c::- :::..lir:c; . or -:ve\" submission of ~his document ~o the Cou::::-t a~ -;:::.:s time. :-:cwever, we are senc.ing copies to both Judge ;,oocs and Xr. ~cC~tcheon so that thev mav be aware that this re~ui=enent of t~e settlement acree~e~t has been met. We antici?ate that the enclosed olan ma'v be .nodified afte:::- :::-eceivinc .cur com.':lents 2.nc after-we learn more about the monitoring r~le ~hat will be untertaken by Eugene Reville. :rW.V:-im :Snclosure cc: The Honorable Hen=y ~ccts Sincerely yours, ALLEN !..A\\: FIF.N ~iJw_(JJJ__ H. William ,AJ,,len , ', The Honorable Aubrey V. Mccutcheon, Jr. ~c~: Dr. Ru~~ Ste~le Sam Sratton, ~sa . Sharon St=ee~~, -~3~. Esa. .; 1 ~ lC EXHIBIT l l  One of the Att One for NLRSD WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS By ~~ -- M. Samuel Jones One of the Attorneys _for PCSSD ROACHELL By tJJ -=p-a--'-u-::1:--:~'-=-::-~-~------ 0ne of Knight the Attorneys for the Intervenors e - i\\RlQ.NS;l.S DEPJ..R.TMDIT OF EDUO..TIOH PULASKI COUNT'! DESZGREGATION MONITORING The Pulaski County School Desegregation Case Settlement Agreement (the Agreement) provides for the State of Arkansas, through the Arkansas Department of ~ducation (ADE), to monitor the irople_~entation of compensatory education programs by t:he school districts in Pulaski Co~nty. The ADE defines comoensatocy educatiQ~_p.J:.agm~ as those o~qg;:_ams wnich are directed at .La,provina the ac2de:nj c r:e,..-=or:;;12:nce -0f-.bl2.ck s..t:udents whose acaaern.ic achievement bas been adversely affected  discriminatorv practices w  D...J:h.e school. Tb.e___state comoensato effects of the programs shouia:'oe it~es in eaucationa Although the Agreement identifies compensatory education as the ~rimary area 'for monitoring, the state's monitoring responsibility is necessarily broader in order to ensure an eauitable education for all students and demonstrate fiscal a~countability to the tax payers of Arkansas. 1:-lonitoring responsibilities for ~esegregation effectiveness by necessity must permeate all elemen~s of schooling to ensure equal opportunities through special state funded remedial progr~s- Therefore, it shall ~e the goal of the ~.DE to ?rovide extensive monitoring and eval\\!acion oi the Agreement. The primary focus of the orocess shall be a continuous assessment 0 the remedial effectiveness of ~rcgr~~s supported partially or f~lly by special state funding resulting from Little Rock School Districc vs. ?ulaski Countv Soeci2.l School District, et al., No. LR-C-82-866. The programs and serv~ces receiving special funding include: 1. ~pe~satory ~cucatio::i)) 2. Magnet Schools ~ 3. Magnet School Transportation 4. Majority to Minority Transfers The Agreement commits ~he state to: l. Direct funui~g to the districts (~ithin the limits provided in ~he Agreement) 2. Principles o~ desegregation a. Remediation of racial academic achievement dispari~ies l ------ ------------------~ b. d. Standacdi:ed test yalidation R~~i~l bala~~e ir. ~pecial programs Minority !'ec:::-u.it:nenc a.nci employ;;ie!1t 3. Site selection c=lceria for school constructio~ or ~xpansion 4. Staff dcvelopme~c release days fer ~he t.~ree districts through _l990-l991 5. -r-... ~ni:-.y million dollars loan to Litt.le ~cc~: School Districc .:.o d~velo? programs for remediacing .a~~ievement disparities and or ~t~er programs and initiacives which facilitate desegregat.ion 6. Selection oi an a~:::-eed standardized test t.o satisfy the loan forgiveness of t.~e ~grcement ..,. .. 3. The ADE shall ~r~vicc 4egular w~it.t.~n ~cn~t.ori~g reporcs t~ t.hc ~art.ies anc tje court. Monitoring by t~e st.ac?. shall be i.idependenc of t.hat of the other parties. As a .last resor~, P.DE may petition the cou~t for modifications or changes in such programs ~eing implemenr.ed ~y ~he districts lbut ~ot fvr ~ r?.6uction in the agr~ed level of stata funding). 4. Any recommc:nca.:ic~s mci.,-:e  oy l\u0026gt;.DE shall :1oc ::or.n t.he basis of ~ny ~ccitior.~l f~nc.ing responsi~il:-::i2s 0f .:h~ _state. Jl.lthongh, i:'!.e .!..DC: rnoni::.;):!\":.:,g shall be inc..~?e?;dc:1c :::)= .::iat of t':le other par~ies, the dis~=:.c~s are advised to cs.:ablish an internal monitoring pla=-i. ~he ;:nr;-ose sha.ll be to det.e=mine anc. document:. that: \\. Th~ desegrega.:ion plan ~as, or is ce~~; implemented on a timely b.;sis, 2. Inequities do no.: exisc and/or do n~r recur; and 3. J\u0026gt;.11 ~tuden.:s a-:e afforc.ed an equi-::a::,le educa-=.ion. 2 L.. !.;CN 1 TOiUHG ~he monitoring process shall be conducted to ensure effectiveness of court order remedies and will include site visitaticns, review ~ plans, review of statistical and administrative data as we11  as percep~ual responses from school personnel, patrons and students. Further, monito_ring ' isits should provide evidence that the school $lte is representative of the pl~ralistic nature of the Air,erican Society. Monitoring tcc:.ms shall be selected by the Director, Arkansas Department 0 Education (]illE), General Division. Tbe teams shall include ;h.DE personnel and may include others as designa-c.ed by the Director. Monitoring visits shall be contl~cted acco~a~ng to a scnedule ~stablishcd by -che i\\DE. The mor1i taring process shall include anno11nced and unannounced visits. Monitors sholl record ~vents and conditions during sit~ visits. Monitors shall observe and report f ind.ings only.  E:ach district shall include in the six-year plan and unxwal school improvement: plans appropriate objectives to c1chieve .;,.:impliance with each court orde:r rela.ted to the Agrcem\u0026lt;::nt.. The ADshall monitor the  si:;;:-vec:1.r olans and :i.nnua.i school improvement pLrns t0 de:t~r~ine progress towa!:d cchieving educational equi tY. District plans should prov-ide evid.ence of ~ompliacce ~ith court aiders and a process to ascertain progress. 'The AD'E shall identify relevant daca necessary to formulc::.te conclusions and recommendations. ~ata should provide: 1. Evidence that policies, pro~edures, rules and requlaticns are developed and implemented to facilitate de$egrega,:ion. 2. Evidence that plans r~lated to reducing achieve~ent disparity between black and non-black students are progressively successful. 3. Evidence ~hat student assignments to schools, clc::.sses and prc:\u0026gt;grams at each organi:::at:ional level are made without bias. 4. Evidence that staff development days authorized as a result of the ~greement are used to facilitate the desegregation process . . 5. Evidenc~ that travel time to and =~cm schools is ~ot disproportionate among black and non-black students and the percentage of black scudents transportea =or desegregation is not significantly greater than the pe.~entage of non-black students transported for desegreg~tion. 6. Evidence that guidance and counseling is designed to meet the ne-=ds of a diverse student pop11lation . 7. Evidence of intern~l procedures for ensuring thr-t materials for appraising or counseling s~udents are non-discriminatoty. 8. Evidenc~ that cur~icular content ~na'instructio~al strategies arc utilized to meet: the diverse ne2ds of the student population serv~a. 9. Evidence that personnel is recruited, employed and :i~signed in a 1nanner to meet ~he goals of a desegregating school district. 10. Evidence that nroce~u~es related to cxtracurricula and ;::o,:urricula 3.ccivit.ies are develooed and imolemented t.o identify and eli~inate =onditions.that resuit ir. participation th~t is dispr.oportionate to the studen~ population. 11. Evidence of aiverse representation on appointed dist.r.i.ct\\.Jic.e nnd school-based committees. 12. Evidence of efforts to .ensure that oaicnt attendance at :.;chool function:~ 1::; not ,11.::proporti~nate t\".o the student population.  l). EJiden,::e of- succ~s:; relate:! to Hajority to Minor:..;:y ~-~a.tts!ars . ;_ 11. Evidence that magnet: schools are an eifective interdis~rict remed.t fo~ racial balance. The collection of data shall include ~t le~st the following: A. Enrol~nent/Attendance 1. Enrollm~nt by race, gender, school, grade, transported, nontransported and instructional prog 1:a.ms. 2. Enrollment by race, gender, grade, .:ransported, nontransporced and instructional program fo~ each magnet scnool. ) . Numbe . .r. of non promotes by race, gender, grace, sch.ool, ::eacher, transported. and. n0nt.ranspor~ed.. B. Test Data Arr:ans;:..s Ninirr.um Performance Tesc results by race, gender, grade, school and :;ocioeconomic status {SES). N:umber of eighth graders failing to axcain 1nast.ery after the first, second and third ad.ministration of test. by race, gend~r, SES and school. Nwnbe= 0 eighth graders th2. t: are non promotes f _or failir.g ;:o at.tain mastery aft.er thi:::-d adrni:1istration of test ~y race, gender, SES and schoql. 14. Metr0politan ~chievement Test - 6th Editiun or other . national normed tests ~s may be adopted by the ADE. Results should be given by race , gender~ grade, school, s~s and teacher. ~S .. ~umber of llth and 12th graders b~ race, gender, ~chool ~na guidance counselor who t~ke the PSAT, S~T or ACT. C:. St:aft , 1. Number of Full TimP- Equivalent lF.T.E.) classroom t1:acl1ers by race, gender, school, years of experien~e. 2. Number of ?.T.E. school-based aaminiscrators by job category, r2.ce, gender1 school, ye2.rs oi experience. 3. Nun\\b~r of F.T.E. counselors by race, g~nder, school, years ct CX?erience.  5 - -'\\ . 5_ 6 . 7 . 8. Numher of F.T.E. kindergarten teachers by race, gender, school, years of experience. Number of F.T.E- librarians oy race, gender, school, years of experience. Numb~r of F.T.E. department heads by race , . gender, school, yea.rs of experience. Nt1mber of F.T.E. secretaries by race, gender, school, years of experience_ N'..llnber of =.T . E. cent~al offic~ positions by job category, race, gender, school, years of experience. D- Policy and Program Infonnation 1. Administrative chart indicates titles, names, responsibilities and reporting responsibilities_ 2. Policies and regulations related to student entrance and exit criteria for course offerings ~nd special state funded programs including: ::'I.. Ma.gnet Schools h. Compensatory Education c. Majority to Minority Transfers d. Transportation 0  - ~   M - - -  3. Student assignment policies, rules ~nd regulations. 4. District policies, rules, regulations and written administrative directives governing: a. Class Assignment b. Testing c. Guidance and Counseling d. Extracurricular Activities e. Student Rights and Responsibilities f. Libr~~Y Usage g_ Student Records S.  Copies of current negotiated agreements with all e~ployee groups. E. Budget Information Quarterly (or monthly, if available) financial reports including: 1. Cost of operating all elementary programs, junior high school programs, and high school programs by .funding source (local/regular state/federal and special state desegregation funding). 6 .. 2. Transportat:i on cost: and funding sour,ce. 3. All legal fees reported by type of services. 4. Compensatory ~ducacion Program cost 5. Magnet school cost: F. Student Discipline 1. ..liW.IlP_er of discipl~D~ .. r .ef err.als _ by __ !,\u0026gt;chool and teacher repbri~d by ra~i.- gender, grade, subject and  teachers' ye:;.rs cf experience; .. 2. Student suspensions, exclusions and expulsions according to type of infractions, length of punishment by race, gender, school and teacher. G. Perceptional Data Results of survey to ascertain perception toward school quality, ~ s_~ces, district ... c:3,I).Q. _ building ~rship, speclal s~ate funded programs and educational equity summarizeci.b~ace, gender, attendance zone, school and grade. ii. Majority to Minority Transfer Number and percentage of students by gender, race, school and grade lev~l, by sending and receiving district. /' ~alysis of data _shall be __ conduct.ed by appropriate ADE personnel and other persons as designated. by the ADE director, Additional data may be required of the c.istricts, a$ deemed necessary by the ADE for the monitoring repor-.s. A schedule . for submitting the data shall be established by the Jl..DE - Si!1ce the moni torir1g is ~assi ,:e anci. e~~ompassir:.g, the A.DC: shall establishmonitoring priorities as. follows: 1. Programs and se~vices supported by special state. desegregation funding incluqing. compensatory educa~ion, magnet schools, majcri ty to minority transfers and related.transpor-.ation. 2. Low achieving schools. 3. Schools with new principals. 4. Any situation icient~fied as unusual. 5. Expanded monitoring as resources permit. 7 -. / ;t,onitoring activities shall be coordinated by the ADE Equity Assistanc~ Center. The site visitation will be conducted by a Learn of no less than two members and no more than five members. At least one team member will be an education professional from the }I.DE. The Equity Assistance Center may conduct random monitoring to ensure the quality of monitoring procedures. Since data analysis is essential to the monitoring process, the state requests the Court to instruct the three districts to provide the ADE all data necessary to implement the monitoring actiJi ties. P.EPORTING The ADE shall provide a written report to the parties and the . Court on a semiannual schedule initially. These initial reports will be on February 1 (or nearest workday) and July 15 (or - nearest workday) of each year or as directed by the Court. The Equity Assistance Center shall be responsible for the written monitoring reports. The written report shall contain a description of the progress of the desegregation process in Pulaski County. Programs end services receiving special state funding resulting from Little Rock School District vs. P11laski Countv Special School Dis~rict 1 et al . , No. LR-C-82-866 shall receive reporting priority. The reports will contain both financi2.l and program information. * The _ADE Desegregation \u0026gt;.ssistance Te~n s~all provide ~ech~i~al . assistance atid suzoort as necessary to implement monitoring ana ..,reporting respor_isibili ties. Current team members are: Administration Student Services Emma Bass Brenda l1a.tthews Sterling Ingram ~1argie Po.vell Robert Shaver Sue Swenson Sue McKenzie Gifted/Talented Martha Bass Federal Programs Clearence Lovell Blizabeth Gaston Incentive Schools Carolyn Elliott Glenda Peyton Marie Parker Early Childhood TBA curriculum Lynda White Horace Snith Janita Hoskyn 3 Special Education Diane Sydoriak Benny Abraham Staff Develoomcnt c-aylc T2al Jackie Dec.man .:.taff 1'.t.tornev Sharon Streett Vocational Education Jean i-lcEnt:.ire - - --- - -- Summary of unwritten agreement between the LRSD, PCSSD and NLRSD regarding hiring teachers under contact with another district. The districts have agreed not to hire teachers under contract with another district from one month before the start of a school year through the end of the school year unless the position at the hiring district is considered a promotion. EXHIBIT /j Summary of unwritten agreement between the LRSD and the LRCT A regarding the use of intern teachers to fill vacancies. The LRSD and the Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association have agreed that a teaching position that becomes vacant after the first student-contact day will be filled with an intern teacher whose teaching contract will not be renewed at the end of the school year. At that time, the position will be listed as vacant and filled consistent with District policy and the PN Agreement. The intern teacher may apply for the position, but he or she is not entitled to any preference in hiring. -.. EXHIBIT 1 i IC \\5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. NO. 4:82CV00866WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. PCSSD RESPONSE TO THE COURT'S ORDER DATED MARCH 1, 2002 The PCSSD for its response, states: RECEIVED APR . -2 2002 OFACE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS 1. It has reviewed the proposed submission of the LRSD and believes the LRSD has adequately described those items that are responsive to the Court's March1, 2002, Order. 2. Item 3 of the LRSD response is a copy of its agreement with the State. The PCSSD wishes to note that the only parties to this agreement are the State and LRSD. PCSSD was not involved in the negotiation of this agreement, is not a party to it and does not believe the agreement has any legal effect upon the PCSSD. Further, the PCSSD does not believe that said agreement could operate to affect or diminish or curtail in any manner those sums and payments which the State is obligated to pay to or on behalf of the PCSSD for the desegregation and other financial programs described within it. 327291-v1 3. Finally, a discrete section of the May 1988 \"Joshua Agreement\" retains vitality. It addresses student balance goals in the PCSSD and is referred to in each of the ODM monitoring reports concerning racial balance. The operative language is quoted by the Court of Appeals as follows: \"However, at a minimum, at the end of the implementation period, no PCSSD school shall have a black enrollment which exceeds the then prevailing black ratio, by organizational level, in the Little Rock School District.\" See Little Rock School Dist. v. Pulaski County Special School District, 921 F.2d 1371 @ 1378, 1379 (8th Cir. 1990). 327291-v1 Respectfully submitted, WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS LLP 200 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3699 (501) 371-0808 FAX: (501) 376-9442 B -~..-=--:--f-..;..:_-:-:-:---:::-::~-:-:--+----ci a I 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On April 1, 2002, a copy of the foregoing was served via U.S. mail on each of the following: Mr. John W. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 2000 Regions Center 400 West Capitol Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Ms. Ann Brown Marshall QOM One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 327291-v1 3 Mr. Mark A. Hagemeier Ms. Colette D. Honorable Arkansas Attorney General's Office 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell Law Firm P.O. Box 17388 Little Rock, Arkansas 72222-7388 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Plaintiff, V. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DEFENDANTS DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. , Defendants, MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al., I ntervenors, KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al., lntervenors. No. 4:82CV00866 WRW RECEIVED APR .- 2 2002 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING NLRSD'S NOTICE OF FILING AGREEMENTS AS REQUIRED BY ORDER FILED MARCH 1, 2002 In its Order of March 1, 2002, the Court directed the parties to identify and submit copies of all its agreements with any other party to the case. The Little Rock School District has shared its list of agreements as contained in the LRSD's Notice of Filing Agreements as required by Order filed March 1, 2002, with the NLRSD. The NLRSD agrees that the agreements listed by the LRSD are in fact agreements among some or all of the parties. The NLRSD is not aware of any additional agreements. Therefore, the NLRSD adopts the Notice of Filing Agreements as its own. However, the NLRSD notes that it was not a party to Item #3, Agreement between the LRSD and the State dated March 19, 2001 re: Unitary Status, Sale of Bond and $20 million loan. Therefore, while the NLRSD agrees that this Agreement exists, it reserves its right to object to the legitimacy and/or scope of that Agreement. Respectfully submitted, Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones, P. A. 425 W. Capitol 3400 TCBY Tower Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 375-1122 Si:WA)~ Stephen W. Jqnes (No. 78-083) I certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the following persons via U. S. Mail on this 1st day of April, 2002. Mr. M. Samuel Jones, Ill Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 200 West Capitol Avenue 2000 Bank of America Little Rock, AR 72201 Richard Roachell, Esq. Roachell Law Firm P. 0 . Box 17388 Little Rock, AR 72222-7388 Mr. Christopher Heller John C. Fendley, Jr. Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 2000 Regions Center 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. John W. Walker JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Marshall Desegregation Monitor One Union National Plaza 124 W. Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Hagemeier Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 _......, ~\u0026lt;GW~ ephen W. Jones // RECEIVED APR - 3 2002 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING p= ;; ~ '''-=\"' I\"\"'' 1;= J l1 k= 4 1 a ~--=bl-.II U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARMl'1SAS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRJCT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKAl~SAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. CASE NO. 82:CV00866 WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL DISTRICT, ET AL. :rv.tRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. _l,l\\MES W. McCORMACK CL:: :-;: .r- ' -,' --------~ PLAINTIB'F c.: - -~ DEFENDANTS JNTER VENO RS JNTER VEN ORS JOSHUA INTERVENORS' NOTICE OF FILING AS REQUIRED BY ORDER FILED MARCH 1. 2002 On March 1, 2002, the Court required the parties to identify any agreements, formal or informal, that existed between the parties. Joshua responds as follows: 1. Joshua Intervenors would be involved in monitoring activities involving plan implementation regarding the three districts. The Districts agreed to cooperate and otherwise facilitate Joshua monitoring. 2. Joshua was to be involved in Little Rock and Pulaski County with the selection of principals for certain schools; devisation of programs, policies and procedures where changes in school operations were contemplated; and were to be informed of administrative plans which had desegregation implications before those plans were presented to either of the school boards for final action. 3. The parties were to cooperate in identifying programs, policies, and procedures which actually either worked or did not work to achieve expected goals of the settlement agreements and, where necessary, to either build upon such programs or to discard them and replace them with programs which had greater probability of success. 4. The districts were to provide data and other information when requested by Joshua in the same manner that such data was to be prepared to the Office of Desegregation Monitoring when requested by that body. 5. The State Department of Education, though relieved as a party, was expected to comply with the requirements of the Allen letter. The State Department was also expected not to forgive the Little Rock School District loan of 20 million dollars without the remediation goals set forth in the Consent Decree having been achieved. 6. There was a scholarship commitment imposed upon Little Rock schools, formerly - identified as Incentive Schools, which guaranteed every student of those schools who graduated from a Little Rock high school with a \"C\" average college tuition. 7. The State Department ofEducation and the parties were required to identify legislation and other state actions which had discriminatory impact upon black students. The State of Arkansas agreed to discontinue and to prevent continuation of those practices. 8. The agreement entered into between the Pulaski County School District and the Joshua Intervenors known as the Joshua Agreement. CONCLUSION The Joshua Intervenors had hoped to continue their discussions with the Office of Desegregation Monitoring in seeking to identify other possible agreements but due to the absence of ODM Moniror, :Wlrs. Ann S. Marshall, we are unable to have that input before the filing deadline. Joshua, therefore, requests leave of court to supplement the foregoing understandings after Mrs. Marshall returns to her office. Respectfully submitted, John W. Walker, P.A 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 501-374-3758 501-374-4187 (fax) ( CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I do hereby state that a copy of the foregoing filing h counsel of record via United States mail on this 1st day of Ap  , 20 - IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT us FILED EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN W,~~~1, c;_TT COURT \" ARl\u0026lt;~ NSAS WESTERN DMSION APR 3 Z002 , ' LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff, vs. * * * * PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL * DISTRICT NO. 1, et al., * Defendants, * * MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al., * Intervenors, * * KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al., * Intervenors. * JAMES Vi   fi , v. /Vi c 1...~li ACK, CLERK Qv , _ ,~ DEP.CLERK No. 4:82CV00866 WRW RECEIVED APR -5 2002 OfACEOF DESEGREGATION MONITORING ORDER The Joshua Intervenors' unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to LRSD's Motion for an Immediate Declaration of Unitary Status is GRANTED. Responses to the LRSD motion are due on or bef;:;ursday, April 18, 2002. DATED thid _ _ day of April, 2002. TATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET IN COMPLIANCE 0~ 11;~ A~~/0 79(a) FRCP 589 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL v1 (),At:u l 1t i. f/4_ RECEIVED APR 1 7 2002 OFFICEOF DESEGREGATION MONITORING PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTER VEN ORS LRSD'S RESPONSE TO THE JOSHUA INTERVENORS' NOTICE OF FILING AGREEMENTS AS REQUIRED BY ORDER FILED MARCH 1, 2002 The Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") for its Response to the Joshua Intervenors' Notice of Filing Agreements as Required by Order Filed March 1, 2002 states: 1. The LRSD admits that it contemplated that Joshua would monitoring the LRSD's implementation of its Revised Desegregation and Education Plan (\"Revised Plan\"). The LRSD also admits that it agreed to \"cooperate or otherwise facilitate\" Joshua monitoring to the extent consistent with Revised Plan 8.2 and 8.3 and with the agreement between the LRSD and Joshua dated June 10, 1998 regarding past and future attorneys' fees for monitoring, attached as Exhibit 8 to LRSD's Notice of Filing Agreements as Required by Order Filed March 1, 2002. Otherwise, the LRSD denies an agreement as alleged in Paragraph 1 of Joshua's April 1, 2002 filing. 2. The LRSD denies that it agreed that Joshua was to be involved in the selection of principals for certain schools; the devisation of programs, policies and procedures where changes in school operations were contemplated; and was to be informed of administrative plans which had desegregation implications before those plans were presented to the LRSD Board of Directors for approval. 3. The LRSD admits that it agreed to \"cooperate\" with Joshua in identifying programs, policies and procedures which worked or did not work to the extent consistent with Revised Plan 2.7.1, 8.2 and 8.3. Otherwise, the LRSD denies an agreement as alleged in Paragraph 3 of Joshua's April 1, 2002, filing. 4. The LRSD denies that it agreed to provide data and other information when requested by Joshua in the same manner that such data was to be prepared to the Office of Desegregation Monitoring when requested by that body. 5. The LRSD admits that the \"Allen letter\" represents an agreement among all the parties to this case. See Exhibit 11 to LRSD's Notice of Filing Agreements as Required by Order Filed March 1, 2002. The LRSD denies that there was an agreement not to forgive the $20 million loan to the LRSD from the State pursuant to the 1989 Settlement Agreement. To the contrary, it was not contemplated at the time the 1989 Settlement Agreement was negotiated that the LRSD would ever have to repay the $20 million loan from the State. 6. The LRSD admits that it agreed to provide scholarships to the extent consistent with-Revised Plan 5.8. Otherwise, the LRSD denies an agreement as alleged in Paragraph 6 of Joshua's April 1, 2002, filing. 7. The LRSD admits that the 1989 Settlement Agreement required the State to \"research and list\" laws that impede desegregation and obligated other parties to assist the State 2 in identifying existing or proposed statutes and regulations that impede desegregation. See 1989 Settlement Agreement,  IILD. Otherwise, the LRSD denies an agreement as alleged in Paragraph 7 ofJoshua's April 1, 2002, filing. 8. The LRSD takes no position with regard to the \"Joshua Agreement\" identified in Paragraph 8 of Joshua's April 1, 2002, filing. Respectfully Submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK Christopher Heller (#81083) John C. Fendley, Jr. (#92182) 2000 Regions Center 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 (501) 376-2011 BY:------,4-'li\"L,C--l_.__;_i~~~~~':L...:......- 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the following persons by depositing a copy of same in the United States mail on April 17, 2002: Mr. John W. Walker JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Sam Jones Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 425 W. Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201-3472 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell Law Firm 11800 Pleasant Ridge Road, Suite 146 Post Office Box 17388 Little Rock, Arkansas 72222-7388 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Marshall (hand-delivered) Desegregation Monitor I Union National Plaza 124 W. Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Hagemeier Offi~e of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 4 9NIHOllNOW NOllY93H93S3a ~o 3~1:1:fO ZOOZ 6 1 ~d\\f RECEIVED APR 1 9 2002 OFACEOF FILED U.S. DISTRICT GOURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS . APR 1 8 2002  a3Al303t:t DESEGREGATION MONITORING JAMES W. McCORMACK CLERK IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT co~ ' EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS DEP CLERK WESTERN DMSION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. CASE NO. 4:82CV00866 WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. :tvIRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTER VEN ORS INTERVENORS SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO LRSD'S MOTION FOR AN IMMEDIATE DECLARATION OF UNITARY STATUS Come the Joshua Interveno~, by and through undersigned counsel, John W. Walker; -P.A., and respectfully move the court for an extension of time for an additional thirty days in which to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for An Immediate Declaration of Unitary Status. Joshua respectfully states: 1. In accordance with the Court's orders ofJanuary 25, 2002 and February 12, 2002, Joshua and the LRSD have engaged in settlement discussions regarding LRSD's Motion for Unitary Status. The parties agree that additional time is needed to continue these discussions. 2. Counsel for the Little Rock School District, Mr. Chris Heller, has authorized undersigned counsel to indicate to the Court that the Plaintiff, LRSD, does not object to the requested extension. 3. Neither party will be prejudiced by the court granting the requested extension. WHEREFORE, the Joshua Intervenors respectfully pray that the Court enter an order extending the time which to respond up and including May 20, 2002. Respectfully submitted, John W. Walker, P.A. 1 723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 501-374-3758 501-374-4187 (fax) \\! , '' l ', , ~, By~d-    / . (, JJo n W. Walk.e r CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I do hereby state that a copy of the foregoing Motion has been sent to all counsel of record via United States mail postage prepaid on this 1 t 11 day of April ,, 002.  Jk,_\u0026lt;j( i V\"' IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. NO. 4:82CV00866WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. RECEIVED APR 2 9 2002 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS PCSSD RESPONSE TO JOSHUA INTERVENORS' NOTICE OF FILING AS REQUIRED BY ORDER FILED MARCH 1, 2002 The PCSSD for its Response to those paragraphs of Joshua's filing which relate to it state: 1. Admits that it knew that Joshua would seek to engage in monitoring activities, but denies that Joshua has engaged in appropriate monitoring activities. 2. Denies that Joshua was to be involved with the selection of principals, denies that Joshua was to be involved in administrative plans, but acknowledges that Joshua has a role to play as respecting programs, policies and procedures as set forth in Plan 2000. 3. Admits that a role for Joshua is set forth in Plan 2000 regarding programs, policies and procedures regarding educational achievement. 4. Denies the allegations contained in paragraph 4 as phrased, but acknowledges that Joshua is enterprising in its efforts to obtain information from the PCSSD. 5. 333093-v1 Admits the allegations contained in paragraph 7. 6. Admits that a portion of the Joshua Agreement retains vitality as respects student assignment in the PCSSD. 7. Denies the remaining allegations contained in Joshua's submission. 333093-v1 Respectfully submitted, WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS LLP 200 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 -3699 (501) 371-0808 FAX: (501) 376-9442 --- -- c--::J:-  ~ .,,.. r,, By J) I --\u0026lt; / ;  \\'- ) '-----' M. Samuel Jones Ill (76,,060) Attorneys for Pulaski-e\"ounty Special School Distr-ict ......._ ___ -- -.. - 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On April 25, 2002, a copy of the foregoing was served via U.S. mail on each of the following: Mr. John W. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 2000 Regions Center 400 West Capitol Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Ms. Ann Brown Marshall ODM One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 333093-v1 Mr. Mark A. Hagemeier Ms. Colette 0. Honorable Arkansas Attorney General's Office 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell Law Firm P.O. Box 17388 Little Rock, Arkansas 72222-7388 M. Samuel Jones Ill (___) J . 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION REC-EIVED APR 3 O 2002 OFACE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF v. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of ADE's Project Management Tool for April, 2002. Respectfully Submitted, MARK.PRYOR Attorney General Assistant Attorney Gen 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 682-3643 Attorney for Arkansas Department of Education CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Mark A. Hagemeier, certify that on April 29, 2002, I caused a copy of the foregoing document to be served by U.S. mail, postage prepaid, on the following person(s) at the address( es) indicated: M. Samuel Jones, III Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 2000 NationsBank Bldg. 200 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Richard Roachell P.O. Box 17388 Little Rock, AR 72222-7388 Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 2000 Regions Center 400 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Ann Marshall One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of April 30, 2002 ~tttizit~~~;tA~~wltgt~~S'.~~g1iiil~il.~if~r~1,~1111,~,~-ftdl~-t~'aHhe 8. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation . 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June.    This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\u003c/dcterms_description\u003e\n   \n\n\u003c/dcterms_description\u003e   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/items\u003e"},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_132","title":"Development Guidance Handbook: A Resource and Planning Guide","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["1992"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Childhood development","Education and state"],"dcterms_title":["Development Guidance Handbook: A Resource and Planning Guide"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/132"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["booklets"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n   00 l\u0026gt;EvElopMENTAl GuKiANcE HAN\u0026lt;lbook 0000 0000 A RESOlRCE ANd PlANNiNG GuidE Arkansas Department ci Education    DEVELOPMENTAL GUIDANCE HANDBOOK: A RESOURCE AND PLANNING GUIDE PUBLISHED BY ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Burton Elliott Director General Education Division Emma Bass Associate Director Instructional Services Division Gayle Teal Coordinator Curriculum Section J.B. Robertson Specialist Guidance, Counseling \u0026amp; Career Education Marlene Bush Specialist Guidance and Counseling #4 State Capitol Mall Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 1987, Reprinted 1992 DEVEL0El1ENI:AL GUILWCE HAND8CXJK: A~ AND PUNNlt\nQJlI\u0026gt;e TABLE OF cnmNrS Fore\u0026gt;rd . ............................................................... . iv Acl\u0026lt;Ix::M ledgoe,ts ......................................................... . V Introot1etioo ............................................................ . Iles igrt. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Plamil'lg, arld ltq\u0026gt;lE!IDIE!Tltat ioo.          ..    . .                               3 ~rel\"letlS i ve ProgratD Res()llrces ..................... c                      5 El !Dell tary Scl1cx:\u0026gt; 1 Yea.rs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Middle/ Junior High Scl1cx:\u0026gt;l Years. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 High Scl1cx:\u0026gt;l Years. Appendixes A. A Systems Approach to Individual Leaming and Development. .. B. Ccmrunity-Based Advisory Calmittee ............................. c. AS:A Position Statement : The School Counselor and the Qiidance and CcA.lnseling Program ... D. ASCA Positioo Statement : The School Counselor and Developmental Qiidance . E. Sources for Identifying Possible Grant or funding . F. Other Sources of Grants and Funding .... G. PlaT'II\"lir\u0026gt;g arKi Evalt1at ioo Resoo.rces  . 17 21 25 29 32 36 40 41       ----- The Standards for Accreditatioo of Arkansas Public Schools required the Arlcansas Department of Educatioo (AI) to develop statewide goals to be used by school districts as a fnllDEY:\u0026gt;rlc for district plaming. Therefore, the ADE divisioo of iliidance Services developed the K-12 ~ and Sequence iliidance Cm-ricuh.111 Qiide to provide statewide goals . aria ooJecf ives_ ~e and counseling.--n'exibility was given to local school districts for the ac~lislnent of these goals and objectives. The.following docunent, the Developmental Qiidance Handbook:~ Resource and Planning Qiide, is intended to supplement the aforementioned K-12 Scope and Sequence Chidance Curriculum iliide. It is also intended to assist counselors in developing a systematic, ~rehensive, developnental guidance progran to meet the needs of all students. Its purpose is to assist the local planning process, not to prescribe. The Devel~tal iliidance Handbook: A Resource and Plaming iliide has been prepared iri aoose-leaf notebook in order to facilitate partial revisions and updating. Your suggestions for improvement, additions to chapters or specific useful resource materials are always welcane and encouraged  iv The Department of Education Guidance Services extends its thanks to the following C001Dittee members who reviewed this docunent and suggested revisions during its develoIXJlellt: Mary l.o.l Miles Elementary School Counselor Carlisle School District Suzanne Ward K-12 School Counselor OJachita School District Jeannie York High School Counselor Kirby Sch:x\u0026gt;l District ~lph \\oA'\\iteside K-12 School Counselor DeValls Bluff Sch:x\u0026gt;l District Dave Floyd Ele11entary Education Supervisor Department of F.ducation F.arl Walton Secondary Education Supervisor Depa\"\"tr'..d'lt of Education Arlcan.sa.s Department of F.ducation, Guidance Services Thelma R. Cook iliidance Supervisor State GED ~inistrator Lynda D. Ha\\wkins Coordinator Guidance, Career Education and GED Testing Rick Griffin Secondary Guidance Specialist J.C. Smith, Olair Q.iidance and Career Education Supervisor Special thanks and recognition are extended to the following for giving their permission to use their materials: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Madison, Wisconsin American School Counselor Association Alexandria, Virginia V       The educational, personal/social, and career development needs of students in the state's public schools can be more effectively met with a kindergarten through 12th grade (K-12) guidance program that systematically and ~rehensively addresses developmental stages loihlch students experience as they progress through school. The following systematic approach is based on the works of Benjamin IHooo, Erik Erikson, Robert Havighurst, Lawrence l\u0026lt;ohlberg, Abraham Maslo.1, Jean Piaget. and others (see Appendix A). It is based on the recognition that all pupils pass through specific developmental stages as they mature. Wlat happens or fails to happen to children/adolescents developmentally will toore than likely detennine lifelong attitudes toward learning and help or hinder the acquisition of skills, attairroent of career goals, and evolvement of satisfactory attitudes about self, soc iety, family and career. School guidance program.5 mJSt be structured to anticipate the personal/social, career and educational needs of pupils and ensure t hat these .~s are met. Such an approach stresses prevention of problems by provid1.ng students with age-appropriate skills and information through instruction, group interaction, and individual COl.D'lSeling. There are numerous human resources in schools and ccrmunities to draw upon. A systematic approach to guidance can help make certain that the skills of the cOLmSelor are used to opti.nun advantage\nthat the invaluable work of psychologists, nurses and social workers interfaces with the guidance program\nthat the classroan teacher's already important guidance role is strengthened\nand that parents and other camunity resource people are kept informed and urged to participate more actively in the education of children. Parents have a particularly important role to play, as their guidance of children begins before and continues after the school experience. Family assistance and encouragement are critical as children develop thoughts and ideas about career choice, learning, them.selves and others. Thus. guidance of pupils as they develop personally, socially, occupationally and educationally is the responsibility of the entire K-12 staff, parents, ccrmunity and local business and industry persorme 1. A ccmparison of traditional school guidance efforts with roore contemporary developmental guidance program.5 is shol.n below. In this cooiparison, the anphasis shifts fr001 working Ioli.th individuals to w10rking with all students, fran renediation to preventioo and fran unplanned/unstructured to systematic/accountable. Traditional Crisis Counseling Infonnation Service Career Infonnatioo Service Schedul ing/Programning Reactive Clerical /Task-Oriented Unplanned llis true tu red Maintain., Status Q-Jo Developaental Preventive Plus Crisis Counseling G.lidance Curriculun Career Planning and Development Program Management Proactive Goal-Oriented Plarmed Daily Activities Accountable Evaluates and Olanges Deeign The overriding goal of the developmental guidance plan is to provide for pupils in grades K-12 a cauprehensive, responsive school counseling program suited to their developmental needs as growing, maturing citizens. The developing stages of children and adolescents may be seen as a predictable series of progressive changes. These changes should lead forward rather than backward and there is a definite relationship between each state of develo?J)E!nt and those that precede or follow it. Those reading and using this plan should think of school counseling and guidance in the context of a program intended to assist pupils with learning readiness, school adjustment and school achievement, career development and goal setting. Such a school COl.D'lSeling program llllSt be : 1. K-12 in scope, 2. based on the develoi:xner,tal needs of pupils, 3. preventive in nature, 4. managed and coordinated so that it is an integral part of the total educational program and S. formed around a delivery system with counselors at the core and the services of others integrated into a total program. The delivery system is structured into three levels to clearly show the relationship of resource providers to canprehensiveness of programs. Level I. The school counselor is the primary program delivery resource, and the program may be limited in scope by the number of pupils to be served by the counselor(s) and other factors. U!Yel II. The counselor is the core and the cla.ssrocm teacher added in. flexibility in guidance pr~ramning, groups, and the invaluable resources of the delivery system, with the classrOOOJ This new dimensia, provides more an opportl.ality to reach students in of the teacher. U!Yel Ill. The counselor is at the core of the delivery system. The classroom dimension expands that system. In addition, the efforts of school staff, coom.mity members, parents and business/industry representatives are coordinated into a program that meets the develoi:mental needs of all students. It is ~rtant to note that the levels are CIJIIJ.llative and interdependent. As the school counseling and guidance program develops from Level I to Level III, the rn.tDber of impediments or barriers to program design, operation and management diminish sharply, and the involvement of all school staff expands proportionately. 2       ~ and lllpl.-entat:ion . Major Dew-J1,w+1tal Areas. The plan focuses on three major areas of student developnent: ~. Penonal./Social and Career/Vocational. These are the types of functional life canpetencies each person IIIJSt attain in order to learn, achieve academic success, and prepare for a satisfying and productive career. lleveLf\\w+Jt91 Student eo.petencles. Specific student canpetencies are listed \\.D'lder each major developmental area. The c~etencies represent basic skills each person should master in order to deal effectively with daily life situations. The ~tencies are listed across age and grade levels and are consistent with children's general physical and intellectual capabilities at various stages. Deli~ Systell. Counselors, parents, school staff, ccmrunity members and business/industry/labor representatives are incorporated into the guidance program delivery system. The school district guidance program manager organizes district resources to address the greatest llllDber of student needs. Resowoe Organization and ~t. Research and experience suggest that develoflDE!fltal guidance is more functional or less ft.uictional as levels of resource organization and management rise or fall. Programs in which the CCA.D1Selor is the sole resource provider may be limited. G.lidance programs which involve a variety of school staff as well as camunity/business/labor/ . industry members are able to more efficiently help students attain skills and canpetencies. (See Appendix B, Advisory c.cmnittee). The key to a successful program is organization and management of guidance providers best suited to assist students in achieving life skills and caupetencies. It is important to note that the levels of resource organization and management described in this plan are c,m1Jative. Devel.qaental COl!petencies and Me8ource ~t The folloong pages are intended to provide local district planners with a matrix which incorporates the K-12 developmental caupetencies, the levels of resource organization and management, and sample activities and strategies that could be used to teach students about the ~tencies. Level I organization relies primarily upon the CCU1Selor. Level II incorporates participation of others on the school staff. Level 111 programning depends upon the interaction of all identified resource providers. The levels are rot independent of one another, but each builds upon the activities and strategies designed for the one before it. Level III is the ID'.)St caq\u0026gt;rehensive delivery approach, as it incorporates the resources of Leve ls I and I I. 3 ~-12 Developaental Coapetencies Developmental guidance is based on the premise that, as all children mature, they pass through various developmental stages vital to their growth. During these stages, specific kinds of learning and developaent must occur to ensure optimal progress. A developmentally based delivery structure spans the K-12 years and matches student competencies that must be mastered with the delivery systems most appropriate for age - or grade-level groups. Elementary school children respond well to situations in which they Lean About and become aware ot new things and ideas. They also need opportunities to explore what they are learning and to try out new things. Midjle/junior high school-aged students are ready for Understanding and experiaentation as they continue to absorb new facts and ideas. High school students need to Apply what they have previously learned and to constantly move toward increased understanding and \u0026amp;dditional knowledge. Developaeotal Student Coapetencies Elementary School Middle/ Junior High School High School Learning About Understanding Applying Learning About Understanding Applying Learning About Understanding Applying 4 ~-12 Leaning Coapetencies ~-12 Personal and Social Coapetencies ~-12 Career and Vocational Coapetencies       CXIHBHl!NSIVB PIIDIAH mDID'S School c~elors help all pupils by establishing individual, graJJ\u0026gt; and classroom contacts with them, collaborating with teachers, and coordinating with other school or connunity guidance r~sources. The clinic.al skills and knowledge base of the counselor are l1I08t effectively used if effort is directed in an organized way toward making the school, the teachers and the curriculum sensitive to those aspects of personal develoi\nment most associated with life success. Counselors serving different school populations function differently, due primarily to variations in the developmental stages of students and in school organization. \\ohatever the setting , however, COU'\\Seling and guidance are functions integral to the school that are maximized i.ihen counselors collaborate with others. Develofm!1tal guidance programs as organized in the Developoontal Q.iidance Handbook provide a three-level approach. At Level I, the focus is on the cOtD1Selor(s) and \"'1.at can be a~lished with that limited delivery resoorce. Level II builds upa1 the unique skills of the school crunselor in conjunction and collaboration with the other staff in the school. Level Ill uses the school program and also parental and cCIJID..U1ity involvement and input to organize the DX)St effective and efficient guidance program. Other individuals in addition to the school counselor play an i.qx\u0026gt;rtant part in the guidance of children and adolescents. Each level of guidance progra111Ding in the DeveloJXDE!!1tal Q.iidance Handbook formally involves these other individuals to varying degrees, sanetimes as resoorces and sanetimes as primary deliverers. CA1 the following pages, involvement levels have been delineated for school boards, superintendents, principals, guidance directors, classroan teachers, vocational education coordinators, vocational education teachers, special education teachers, pupil services staff, ccmrunity business and irrl.lstry representat i ve.s , and parents. As the comprehensiveness of programning increases, so irust the involvement of others. This involvement nust be coordinated, or the systematic approach to develoJXDE!!1tal guidance will be lost. Level I involvement of others is primarily supportive. Level II programning utilizes the abilities of others on the school staff and coordinates their participation in guidance activities. At Level Ill, the counselor and the other hLman resources of the school and COITlll..lllity are used as the delivery system. Level Ill programning depends on the collaborative efforts of many to provide a canprehens i ve guidance program for all pupils. 1. SQOJL BQ\\RD MD1BER A. Supportive--Recogni zes the state standard ...tiich requires that cx:,unseling be available to all K-12 students  B. Particip.\ntive- -Provides ad~ uate financial support for the program in such areas as personnel , staff development, cleric.al support and materials . 5 c. lnterdependent--Supports policies for delivering the guidance program as an integral part of the total educational process so that all of students' development needs are met. 2. DISTRICT AIMINISTRATOR A. Supportive--Understands the guidance needs of school populations. Establishes and reviews counselor job descriptions in the cootext of developmental guidance. 8. Participative--Works with the school board, faculty, acininistrative staff and coom.mity to secure support for develo}Defltal guidance. Insures that the guidance staff is represented on the district acininistrative council. C. lnterdependent--Views all s..::hool personnel as having a part to play in an articulated developmental guid~nce p~re:D. Provides leadership for an active, ongoing guidance program. Requires accountability and evaluation of the progress toward goals, objectives and develoi:mental student outccxnes. 3. BUIIDOC PRINCIPAL A. Supportive--Establishes a positive climate for implementing the guidance program. Recruits qualified personnel and provides them with the necessary facilities, time, equipment and clerical staff. Assists  with a public relations program that will eq\u0026gt;hasize guidance as an  integral part of the total school program. B. Participative--Works closely with the guidance staff to plan, ~lement and evaluate the guidance program. Uses the guidance staff to plan in-service, evaluatioo or assessment of guidance program. Encourages parents, COIIIII.Jl1ity members, and bJ.siness and industry representatives to participate in the education system. Assures that the guidance program staff is relieved of excessive clerical and non-developmental guidance duties. C. Interdependent--Encourages staft members to upgrade skills and knowledge for implementing guidance programning. F.ncouraging counselors to assume managerial role to facilitate the establisl\"IDent of a developmental guidance program. Monitors program effectiveness for the goals, objectives and developmental student ootcomes identified in the guidance program. 4. DIRECTOR OF CURRICUUM A. Supportive--Infuses develofXl)eOtal guidance awareness through curriculun. Assists to identify curricular resources for the guidance program. B. Participative--Coordinates the guidance program with other district  curricuhns. C. Interdependent--\\.,lorks with guidance staff to plan, implement and evaluate the comprehensive developmental guidance program. 6    S. DIRFL\"'llE OF GUICWCE A. Supportive--Provides the district \u0026amp;:binistrator and school board with informatioo oo funding, personnel, program and evaluation needs. Praootes professional growth of all guidance personnel. 8. Participative--Establishes a systematic approach to making guidance available K-12. Seeks and maintains cooperative working relationships with all personnel whose roles and responsibilities affect the development and implementation of the guid....'1Ce program. Provides leadership for development of the appropriate guidance program ~lementation plans. Coordinates regular, planned meetings \\iihere counselors share information, consult on specific problems, and develop and refine systemwide programs. C. Interdependent--Works with administration and supervisory staff to plan and develop the K-12 guidance curriculLID. Assigns staff and coordinates all curricular guidance activities. Coordinates the guidance program and the resQlU\"ces provided by teachers, parents and others. Pranotes a cauprehensive, pupil services ioodel delivery system. 6. PSYQl.}L(X\nISI, SOCIAL \\.ORKER, SQO)L NUR.5E A. Supportive--Coordinate referrals to other guidance service persormel. Camunicate regularly oo district pupil service programs. 8. Participative--Work with the guidance staff to provide infonnation to school/ccmDJnity about \"at-risk\" students and assist with programning designed to reduce those risks. Utilize a cauprehensive pupil services team approach to coordinating programs and services for students in crisis. C. Interdependent--Are involved in planning. implementing and evaluating the guidance program so that all students receive systematic guidance based on learning, personal/social and career/vocational needs. 7. voc.ATIOOAL IDX:ATIOO TFMl-lERS A. Supportive--Assist vocational education students to achieve specific vocational ~etencies which wi 11 enable them to gain entry into an occupational or post-secondary setting. 8. Participative--Work cooperatively with counselors to provide ~loyment counseling, placement and follow-up services for students enrolled in vocational courses and cooperative programs. C. Interdependent--Work with counselors and entire staff to ensure that all students receive instruction or information on occupations, ~loyability skills, current job market and intervi\u0026amp;'i.ng techniques. Participate in the various activities of planning, i~lementing and evaluating the guidance progam . 7 8. TF.AOIERS A. Supportive--Refer studmts to counselor for assistance. Create positive, interactive relationships with students and provide a primary. basis for intellectual, social and emotional growth. B. C. Participative--Request assistance frcn counselor to plan and implement guidance activities in academic and vocational curriculun. Participate in guidance programning, i.e., as co-facilitators of groups, in advisor/ advisee progr~, as primary instructors in sane areas and support students in crisis. Interdependent--~ize the value of developmental guidance. Use subject areas to assist students in developing personal/social, career and learning ~tencies. Work as team members to plan and implement guidance activities essential to the overall development of students. 9. BUSI.NESS AND 1NIU5TRY REPRESmrATIVE.5 A. Supportive--Provide speakers, field trip opportunities and school daI01Strations to increase student knowledge of the work world in their ccmrunity. B. Participative--Provide information and opportunities for students to participate in co-op programs, job-shadowing, and work experience. Encourage and participate in student organizations. C. lnterdependent--Provide up-to-date labor market information, co-op and  apprenticeship sites, and mentorships for all students. 10. PARENTS A. Supportive--Provide support for children through participation in parent conferences, school activities and volunteerism. Work with teachers and counselors to support their children's learning, personal/social, arxi career/vocational growth. B. Participative--Partici.pate in school curricular, extracurricular and guidance activities serving their children. Praoote guidance as an ~rtant part of education. C. Interdependent--Participate on the guidance catlllittee that will facilitate i~lementation of the guidance program. Serve as mentors and models for classes. 11. cntfJNIT'i SERVICES AGF.R:IE:5. A. Supportive--Establish camunication and referral channels. B. Participative--Provide information oo services available to students and families. C. InterdepE:ndent--Participate in planning and implementatioo of a guidance program that includes services and activities provided by the c001JU11ity agencies. 8     KIJNINfMY sam. 1IAIS Children in elementary school have already begun to acquire learning, personal/social and career/vocaticnal conipetencies. The following plan describes specific, fundamental coq\u0026gt;etencies that should be addressed through the framework of a developmental guidance program. The goal is to take a preventive, instructional approach by planning the guidance program around the coq\u0026gt;etencies elementary school-aged children nust acquire and to ensure that program services will be delivered to all elementary students. The strategies and activities listed are suggested ways to address the coq\u0026gt;etencies. The exact programing fornaat and delivery responsibility IIJ.lSt be detemined by each district as it goes through the ~lementatioo process and procedures. As the level of resources increases, the strategies and techniques become oore caq,rehensive. The mphA.sis oo prevention and utilization of available resources makes it a oost-effective approach  9 Eleaeotary School Learoiog Coapetenciea lll!llt and 1'\\at is expected of sru:lents. U1derstam strengths, abi litie. s am how to learn 11DSt effectively. lhierstam relationships alDlg ability, effort and the quality of schoo 1 achieYBIBlt. rstam how to assess learning needs am 'Wh?re to seek help. Uooers tam the process of sett  ueaningful schoo 1 achievellB1 t goals . Level of l.eaoarce and llanageaeot Counselors Be available for inch - vidual CCU1Seling. Provide service to teactr ers cmceming speci fie children. Consult with PlJltidisciplinary Teans oo specific edocat ion needs of s tuden ts. \\obrk in:livicrually with child on how best to Counselors  School Staff I)) grrup 'WDrlc vi th a 11 children to provide orientatioo to scoool. Assist staff to ~iz.e learning how to learn. Calduct stuient asse.sslll! llts of incf i vidua 1 learning styles am share results vi th students . Identify children \"at Aiisist vi.th coordination risk\" and respcn:I to their of activities that exhibit needs. relaticn,hips betlieell effort am product. \\obrk vi th in:! i vidua ls I)) t.eall,IOric that pro-who need assistance in vides children vi tn se lf-eva luat ioo . asse.s91Blt opportuu ties ~ certain all children 50 they bec\u0026lt;ae ccmfort- 1.Diers tan:! who is avai 1- ab le vi th the process . able to help . \\obrk vith stu:ients who dem:nstrate a lack of interest in scmol. Level I Teach the process of goal setting in curricular and ertracurricular activites. Level 11 10  Sct,ool Staff  Parents  . C~lty  Business/Industry  l'teet vi.th parents of all kindergarteners. Explain guidance programs to studellts and parents. Provide staff in-service in learning styles and identification of sai:e. Establish parent/comunity voh.nteer tutoring progrc1115. Secure staff agreerent oo S\u0026lt;J1E cause and effect rules for the sch:x:\u0026gt; 1. Get rosiness / ~try Ul?lt on mtivatioo techniques and the value of work. Train staff to clearly explain tests, rep::irt cards, achievene,t IIE.asures and interest inventories to children and parents . Assist in developing p grims illustrating the need to set goals\nassist parents to help children set and achieve goals . Level 111    Eleaeotary School Personal/Social Cc:.petcncies Exhibit conflictresolution ski-lls . th adults and peers. Exhibit respect for individual freedcms and ri~ts of self and others . lhiers tam the COll56JUeflCe5 of actions for self and others. lhiers tam the influence that Jitysical, emtional an:i intellectua 1 behaviors have on ooe another. Be aware of own em,t ion.a 1, Jitysica 1 and intellectual deYe 10p1Hlt . Levels of Resource Organization and Naoageaent Counselors W:\u0026gt;rk vi th s ti.den ts who are \\nable to resolYe conflicts in an acceptable 1MJ111er. ~l individually vi.th s tuicn ts who infringe on r~ts of others. W:\u0026gt;rk with eroups of individual 5 who appear ln:fWare of the ca\\Slequences of their actions. W:\u0026gt;rk individua 1ly vith stuients who 00 not ll'lderstar.:! tOJ Jitysical and enotional oody fu1c t ion.s are interrelated . W:\u0026gt;rk vi th children tnaware of tlx?ir own deYe lopieit . Assist teachers vi th students who are deYe lop-Ent. ally immture. Level I Counselors  School Staff W:\u0026gt;rk vi th stuicnts to minimize conflicts. W:\u0026gt;rk vi.th groups of students to foster an appreciAtion for ri~ts and freedan of others.  School Staff  Parents   Coaaun1ty  Business/Industry c:arry rut staff devel0p- 11E1t on positive conflict re.solution methods as opposed to p.nishrents. lb staff develo1J151t to ensure that individual freedcrrs and ri~ts are exanincd th~ the curriculun. Assist in activitcs lJ1 the PrCJTOte classrCXJTI visits classroan that illustrate by police or Judges. the in1)0rtance of taking re5JXX1Sibility. Crndoct activities which allow sti.dents to share camon concerns regarding Jitysica 1 and mvtiona 1 deYe lop!Cn t. lb grotq:\u0026gt; work vi th stuicnts who evidence camon devel\u0026lt;J111e1tal difficulties. Organize day vith senior citizens. W:\u0026gt;rk vi.th staff to erilance tn:lerstanding of how all aspects of chi 1- dren' s developrent i.apact on le.a ming. Fonn grrups to assist parents in tn:lerstanding children's developrental processes. Teach curricular mi.ts on Sensitize staff to re-- specific deYelop!Elltal spect stwcnts' individ-areas. unl rates of growth tiona}, chysical and l.fltel edual. Level II Level 111 11 Eleaentary School Personal/Social Coapetencies (continued) Learn to cmrlllnicate with peers .n1 adults in varirus ha!E, sch?o 1 and cannm ty settings . CDnse 1 vi th children who are having difficulty expressing thBmelve:s. [evelop a posi- \\t\u0026gt;rk with stu:ients who ti ve se 1f and so- are oot adjusting we 11 to cial self-coocept. scrool. lhlers tarn the concept of engoing change in sdX\u0026gt;OOl, hcnE and camuri ty lives. lhlerstand .n1 respect differences am:ing people's cultures, lifestyles, attituies and abilities. Ass i.s t teachers .n1 parents vi th these stu:ients . Co.nse 1 ind i vidua 1 chi 1- dren who are having difficulty in new situations. Provide i..\"'ld i vidua 1 co.nse ling to solve specific relationship conflicts. Level I ~iz.e camuucation in the classroan by stnrturing time for talking .n1 sharing. Coordinate program5 that msure positive scooo 1 experiences for a 11 stu:ients . Cadtrt grrup work to explore dwl8(! an:i oow it relates to the ind i vidua 1. D:\u0026gt; group work .n1 tean teaching to ll'Ddel good interpersonal relaticnships. lt:Jde 1 good interpersooa l relationships schoolvide. Level II l 2 Coordinate activities in schoo 1 and rut that encru.rage camuricatioo bet\\oleel1 children and those they need to be able to talk to. 1.brk to help parents and teachers U'Xlers~ the i.n\u0026gt;rtance of a positive se If-concept and how to foster it in all children. Recognize the rapid changes in technology and give stulerlts opportl. ni ties to see new IIBChines. Coordinate activites that =age broadening range of acquaintances. Provide staff and camunity with opportl.llities to learn about varirus cultures represented in the school PCOJlation. Level Ill       Eleaeotary School Career/Vocational Coapetenciea Levels of Resource Organization ~ and l'laoageaeot --------~elors School Staff  Parents Counselors + Coapeteocies + Coaaunity ---- Counselors School Staff + ------ Business/Industry Acquire know 1- edge about different occupa-t icns and changing uele/femle roles. BecCJIE aware of personal in-terests and preferences. I.earn oow to cooperate .-id coexist with others in wrk and play. Lhierstand \\lhat it OEa1S to wrk and hOW' school wrk re lat.es to future plans. la::areaware of '-Urlds beyood the imlai ia te experience. Provide occupa t iooa 1 Provide i.n formation Qx:mhnate efforts to infometion to be used by ~ the aedi.a center, have a variety of all teachers as a cooperative and field people speak to classroan re.!nlrce. trips. classes about their \\i,rk vith stuierits ~ have vocational or\nr,\nocatiooal interests aoo discuss oow they 11BY purSlE them. Provide i.n:ii vidua 1 ~ seli.ng to help stuierits solve specific relationship con.fl ic ts . Te.an teach a tni t on careers and the wrld of wrk. Ck\u0026gt; group wrk to enable stuients to becall! aware of their vocational interests and lifestyle preferences. Form a CCU1.Selor and teacher teaD for ac ti vi - ties that vi 11 encourage cooperation. Develop career awareness curr iculun or Jfu lo.soi\ntiy that provides for oogoi.ng career edocat ioo in the classroan. .A:\u0026gt;rk vith iniividual  Te.ach activities to s tuien ts to develop self- edlance 5raI'eJle.5S of self awareness. Level I in relation to the rest of the wrld. Level II 13 ~tions. Coordinate ccma.nity efforts that allow sttr dents to purStE their vocational interests outside of scoool. Carry out staff develc,ir IIEfl t to p['l'.Jll)t.e cooperat im as a scoool Jfulo. soi\ntiy. Encoura,o\ne !'C' lat ions hips ~ labor and ioous try and school concerning curricuh.rn that realist ica 11 y nEe ts the needs of the i.n:ii vidua 1 and society . Provide staff in-service to illustrate the need to be aware of se 1f in order to re late we 11 with others . Level III Kiddle/Junior Bigb School Years Students in middle/junior high school have unique developmental needs. This time of life brings much of the physical, emotional and cognitive growth and change that human beings go through . To assist students with this growth process, the following charts address age-specific competencies, and the strategies and techniques are suggested ways to address these competencies. Exact programming format and delivery responsibilities must be determined by each district staff as it goes through the implementation process and procedures. Please note that as the levels of resources increase, strategies and techniques become more comprehensive. Kiddle/Junior High School Learniag Coapeteocies Develop internal acadmri.c IIDtivatioo . Develop good sttdy skills. l)?velop a sense of the future and how to IIDVe toward it. lb:iers taro strengths and abilities and how to learn DDSt effectively F.xhibit problem-so 1 ving skills. Cotrue 1 inh vidua 1 srudeflts who laclc academic 11Dtivatioo. Rt\u0026gt;rk with gr-oops of stu:ients who h:lve poor sttdy skills . D:\u0026gt; inh vidua 1 ~rk with stu:ien.s who lack tn:ler-s taro ing of oow actions af f~t cxn,equences. Participate oo l'tlltidisciplinary Teaii\n. A.5s is t individuals to approach probl8DS in a logi ca 1 l!B\"ller . Level I Discuss with stuien ts lll1d parents 111\u0026gt;tivatioo lll1d how it rel.ates to academi C per fol\"llllllCe . ~lliJi! staff to ex.!llt'\" ine assigrne,ts lll1d requin!lll!flts and to promote basic sttdy skills. Pramte participatioo in future problm 90lving. Inform parents abrut learning styles and tutoring strategies . ~lliJi! utili.z.atioo of prob lSIHIO 1 ving skills in the classrocm. Level II 14 Develop i.ncen ti ve partnershi p.s with local rusiness/ in:iustry to prmote academic perfornence. Rt\u0026gt;rk with parents to e,able them to assist their children with stu:iy ski l ls and ~ rk . c.arry rut staff develop- 11e1t on in\u0026gt;rt.ance of stwents obtaining a future/goal orientatioo. D:\u0026gt; staff deve lorent oo learning styles and adapting te.ach.ing strategies to lll!Jet the needs of stuients. Provide infornetioo for pa.rents and others oo the ilqx\u0026gt;rtance of problemsolving skills. Level III    Kiddle/Junior High School Personal/Social Collpetencies  . . ~ 1. .. .is of lesource Or~ , and llanageaent School Staff  ~ Counselors Puent,  Coapetencies  C-mity --------- Counselors School Staff  Business/Industry lh:ie rs t.aixl CAnse l inii vidua l s tu- D:\u0026gt; g'\"OJP w::\u0026gt; rk to di.scu.,s Assist staff to plan !XJYSical, EmJ-- dents \\n:lble to cope vith the rapid changes s tu- humn grCMh and develop-tional, and the i r rapidly changing dents a.re exper ieocir'b . Delt Classes. inte llectua 1 bodies and/or 01Dtions. Assist parents vith growth and devel-growth and deve lop!Hlt ~t. issues. te.,e lop self and Ca.n9e 1 stuient.s who haYe W:Jric vi th grrups to ex- W:Jric to help parents and social self- a negative se lf-coocept . plore iniivirual differ- teachers tn:lers taro the cx:n::ept. ence.s and gain an accep-- ~rtance of a i:ositive ta'lCe of them. se l f-coocept and row to Teadl stuients self-foster it in all children as ses91Bl t and se lf-  referral technicrues . Urrlers tan:! and D:\u0026gt; group canse ling to Provide CUIT icu lar and Assist staff in develqr develop peer solve specific relatiexr extracurricular ac:tiv- ing curricular offerings relation.ships. ship cmflicts. ities \\Auch encourage which deal vi th inter-heterogeneow and tom:,g-enea.. i.s re lat ion.ships. persooal relationships. Exhibit i:ositive W:Jric vi th s tuien ts who Assist teachers an! par- Carry out staff develop-attitu: ie toward exhibit a negat ive atti- ents at~ting to relate l!Blt oo creating a i:osi-scmol, fairi.ly tu:1e toward scmo 1. to s tuients vi th a nega- tive scmol clillBte. and self. tive attituie. learn to w.nse 1 in1 i vidua l O::nh: t group sessions Assist staff to a:odel ccma.ni ca te stuients having di ff icu 1 ty oo flmri.ly camanicatioo good ccnmnicatioo vi th parents . re la ting to their parents . and relations. skills. Provide inf onmt ioo oo ccnmni ty resrurces for faai 1 y couise l in.R . learn to cope CAnse l inii virua l D:\u0026gt; group w::\u0026gt;ric oo stress Plan staff develoient IWi th life I S pres- stuients lI'\\Bble to cope redoctioo ard/or coping oo stress reductioo and sures, defeats vith stress. slcil L'l. ~ing excess stress and soccesses. i, s ta.lents. learn to deal Colnse 1 in1 i vidua 1 s tu- D:\u0026gt; group w::\u0026gt;ric to exp lore Provide infonmt ioo oo vi th oogoing den ts having di ff icu 1 ty row the manging ,..,rld changes in the w::\u0026gt;ric changes in per- i..n::lerst.and ing row and vill ~t oo stuients. w::\u0026gt;rld and row to be scna 1 and aca- why the w::\u0026gt;r ld is changing. prepared for them.  dsaic life . Level 1 Level II Level III l 5 Kiddle/Junior Bigb School Career/Vocational Coepetencies Ulderstand dee is ioo-,mking skills. 1.arn to cope vith transition in school, halE cn:1 camurity lives. Becare i.' lfo med about alternative edocat iona 1 an:! vocational choices an:! prep-aration for them. 'Relate persooal interests to broad occupa-tional areas. lh:lerstand aro use camurication skills. 1.arn humn cooflict mnage- IIBlt vi th adu 1 ts aoo peers. learn that sex role sterecr typing, bi.as, or discrimination limit choices , ~mnities ochievme1t. \\i:\u0026gt;rlc vi th stu:ients ~ exhibit an inability to IIBke decisions. ..,ld orientations to fa-mi 1 iarize s tu:ients vi th the expectations of the new envircnEnt . Comsel stu:ients having di f ficu ~ ty a:! just i.ng to new envi n:nieits . Provide ~ti ona 1 and edoca tiona 1 inforneticri to a 11 te.achers . Ehsure that s tu:ients liderstand the ~t of ~se choices. .ldninister interest in- 'A:!ltories to stu:ients to acquaint then vi th their interests. \\i:\u0026gt;rlc ... i th s tu:ien ts hav-i. ng difficulty ccmn.ni - cat i.ng vi th peers or adults. \\i:\u0026gt;rlc vi th s tu:ien ts 1'tlo are l.llab le to re.solve ccnflicts in an accept-able l!B\"ller. Ca.nse 1 vi th s tu:ient s 1'tlo are having difficulty imla.ng choices. Level I Carey rut dee is iOl'Hl8king an:! problem-solving ac-t ivities for grmos .r.oo classes . Have class roan dLSC\\JS-sions cri e:\u0026lt;pectat ions in new envirameits am how to respond appropri - ately. C.OOrdinate efforts to have guest speakers cri varirus ~tional areas. Provide d 1scu.ss ions for s tu:ien ts cri how interests are related to occupa-tional choices. Teach camu1icaticri skills. Provide interpersooal camuricaticri worlcstlp5. ~ grn4) worlc vi th stu-dents to better lider-staxl differences in in-di vidua 1 respmse.s to conflict. Inform stu:ients and par-ents about the career op-portuuties open to both sexes. Level 11 16 Provide staff develOl]IB1t cri how dee is ion naking can be incorporated into a 11 curricular areas . \\i:\u0026gt;rk vi th teachers, par-ents, an:! others to assist students in tran-siticri periods. C.OOrdinate camini ty re-sources to IIBke a 11 s tu-dents lll)re fully aware of voca t iona 1 coo ices aro the edocation required for them. Carry rut staff develop-rrent activities on inter-ests, OC::upf!tiooal ~I~~ ca~eer Provide staff develov- IIBlt \u0026lt;rl requiring good ccmn.nicaticri skills in all subject-area classes. ~ staff deve l01]1B1t on positive conflict resolu-t ion 112tln:Ls . Prarvte a career day fe.aturi.ng pare,ts aro camu1i ty IIBibers woo worlc in tra:litional aro naitra:litional careers . Level Ill       High School Years High school is the gateway to further education for some students and the last formal educational experience that others will have. The following competencies take into account the important choices that students must make during their high schocl years and lists the skills they will need as they mature educationally, personally and vocati onall y . The strategies and techniques described in the charts are suggested ways of helping students acquire the competencies. Programming format and delivery responsibilities must be determined by each school district staff as 1t goes through the implementation process and procedures. Once again, as the level of invested resources increases, strategies and techniques become more comprehensive. High School Learning Coapetencies . ------ ~e lors Levels of Resource Org + and Kanageaeot School Staff  Parents Coapeteocies Counselors + + C-Unity ------------ Schoo 1 Sta ff + Counselors Business/Industry lhlerstand learning abi li - ties am oow best to apply them. BecCIIE infor.!Bl alnlt self ~ assess-l! Blt techniques . Learn to set reali.stic goals am ~lop strategies to reach them. lh:ierstand the sdro 1 curri culun am the ~ pact CO-ll'se selection wi 11 have on future plans. lhders tand the school errvi roollEl1t am what 1s expected. WJrk \"\"1th l'\\Jltidisci-p Ii.nary Tean for s tu:ients experiencing learning difficulties. Schedule iro i vidua 1 coo-fererces to discuss re-sults of standardized tests . WJrk with s tu:ients irn i - vidually to help them set short - am loog-tem goals. l'ee t with irn i vidua 1 stuients to discuss future p 1ans . Colnse 1 iroi vidua 1 s tuden ts mable to coofonn to the scoool l!Blt am/or f\u0026gt;XPeC tat ions . errviron- Level I Gi ~ am exp lain to Stu-dents iroividual learn-ing style i.r'M!ntories. D:J gro.ip 1o1::\u0026gt;rk oo tnder-staroing what tests as-sess , oow to take them ani haw to learn f ran the results . lbld gro.ip discussion.s oo goa 1 setting ani strategies to help stu-dents reach goals. l'eet with group.s of stu:lents to discuss the need for choosing classes care fu 11 y. Tean teach to discuss the schoo 1 errvi rcn!'fflt am its expec tat ioos with all stu:ients. Level II 1 7 D:J staff deve lCJ?IBI t oo learning sty 1 es am adapting teaching strategies to aeet needs of stlrlents. Assist staff to gain a better tnders tand ing of stan:iardized tests am the i.n3c t they have oo stu:lents. Provide staff developll'E'flt to stress need for students to set goals am nethods Of helping them do so. Assist staff as they develop am articulate curricu 1 t.m across the district. Utilize rosiness/industry nert:ers to speak oo the re la-t 1 on.sh1 p of school am 1o1::\u0026gt;rk. Level Ill High School Persoaal/Social Coapetencie  Levels of Resource Organisation ~ and llaaageaent Counselors ------------- School:Staff ------------- Parents Counselors Coapeteocies + + COlaUDi ty --------- School Staff + Counselors Busioess/lodustrv ~rstaoo IEY5ica l , aiotiona 1 and inte llectua l growth cnl deYE! l op!Bl t. Learn to cope with change al:! plai for the future. CGulse 1 in:l i vidua 1 s tudents having difficulty coping with deve lop!Blt. Teach an:i teao teach groi,th an:i deve)opn?Ilt cnl to, they are inter-re lated. Cou,sel in:lividual stu- C\u0026lt;n:hrt ~ work to dents tnable to cope with discuss the chariging cha1ge. world am to, it i.q\u0026gt;ac ts on stuients . Assist staff in developing curriculun which addresses all areas of deve lop!Blt. Ck\u0026gt; stat f deve lopta1t oo the ~t of change oo Stooeflts. I I.earn ht.man Orient new stuients al:!/ or frestmen. \\i:\u0026gt;rk with in:li vidua 1 D:\u0026gt; ~ work to discuss in:liviooal differeoces Get input f rem t:us iness / industry oo techno logica 1 change am the future. ,. Ck\u0026gt; staff deve lopren t oo coo.flic t re.so lu- stuients tnab le to rein: lividual differences tioo skills with solve cooflicts in a adults and peers. positive mmer. and to minimize coof1 icts. Understand and ~reciate one's CMl capabilities and those of others. Provide opporturi ties for Ck\u0026gt; ~ work oo \\Dier-interact ioo with in:l i - starxi ing one 's own capavidua ls of varying abil- bi lit ies al:! to, best to thierstaoo perscnal re latiooships and to, to establish an iniepement identity. To..!\ne responsi - bility for persmal decisioo.s . ity. Cou1.se 1 in:l i vidua 1 students experiencing di f fi - cu 1 ty developing per-sen. al relatiooships. Cou1.sel with stuients \\IOO are wi 11 ing to take respons i bi li ty for actiCX\\5. Level I u.,e them. lbld 91811\n..-roup disCU5sions oo relaticnships, the need to ~ independence and construe ti, -e lll!a'lS of doing so. \\i:\u0026gt;rk vi th peer grwps to prcm,te a.iarene.ss of impact of decisioo.s aoout issues such as drin!ung and drivi.r1_g i!l1d others. Level II 18 and dea 1 ing with them in the c lassrCXIIl. Invo lye school/ ccrmuni ty with Special Olympics or other similar activities. Ck\u0026gt; staff developrent oo \\n:ierstaooing snreits' needs for inieperdence and good personal relaticnships. Secure camuu ty / schoo 1 collaboration to publi-c i:ze ~rtance of neking infonred dee is ions aoout coot.eqiorary issues. Level Ill   Bigb School Career/Vocational eo.petencies Levels of Resource Organization ~ and Nanageaent ~-~------- -------- School: Staff ----------- -------- Parents Coapetencies Counselors + . + C~ity ------- Counselors School Staff + Business/Industry lhiers tam Colnse l in:1 i vidua 1 s tuani develop deci- dents experiencing dif- Team teach tni t m deci - sim uaking an:l career choice. Assist staff in iocorJXr rating dee is iorH!aking skills into their curriculuns. sirn-1!Blcing ficulty lIBking decisioos. skills. U'lderstam the world of work an:l its expectations for enploy11e1t. Becme inf orne:1 aoout ~ timal/work alternatives. th:iers tam cm t inn.ls changes of mle/ feDBle roles an:l how this relates to career choice. !Eve lop the interpersona 1 skills necessary for ha.maly in the worknlace. BecaIE in-fo rne:1 about upto- date ~loyllBlt opportunities during and after high sdr:x\u0026gt;l. Provide 11Bterials m occupa tion.s and postsecoodary inst i tut ioos . Tuan with tusiness/~ try experts to te.ach tnits m ~loyue1t expectations. Assist staff to iocorJXr rate world-of~rk expectations soch as p.nctuality, respollSibi!ity, arrl ac=tability into the cl\nissroan. \\.brk with in:iividual stu- lt:lld group discussions of Provide staff deve lorr-dents m post.seccn:lary educatimal arrl work al- l'IBlt m postsecco:1ary ed-educational an:l worx al- tematives after high LCatimal an:l work al-ternatives. schxll. tematives. \\.brk vith individual s tu:len ts experiencing difficulty with the dlalging roles of IIB1 and \\QIEl'l. Gotnsel with stulents displaying a lack of i.nterpersona l skills . l'llke ~lO'fl!Blt opport\\ ni ties arrl career p lnri.ng 11B teria ls avai 1- ah le for stuient use. Level I lt:l ld group discuss ims m how the changing roles of mles and females msy affect career opporttnities. r:o group work or tean teaching to discuss how interperscnal skills are required for hanrooy in the workplace . Ccl'dr t grc,..ip5 to exp lore var irus ~ loyue1t an:l career opport\\ni ties . Te.an teach tni ts oo ~ loyue1t opport\\ni ties. Level II 19 ~age parent invo 1 vellBl t as s tu:len ts exp lore educa t iooa l arrl \\,Q rk alternatives. Assist staff to gain understaming of ha,, societal attitu:ie.s ~t on rrele/femle role develoirl'IBlt. r:o staff deve loren t on how interpersroal skills are essential for all s tu:len ts as they enter the \\,Qrld of work. C.OOrd ina te camuni ty resrurces to give stuients opport\\nities to learn of ru:ierrus and varied careers. Provide 11B1torships for s tu:lents in areas they wish to explore. Level Ill High School Career/Vocation.al Collpetenciea (continued) eo.peteocies Levels of Resource llaoageaeot and llaoageaent Counselors  School Staff Form tentative Provide current aateri.als r:o group work oo goal career gmls am for career awareness an1 setting and stratpg:ies strategies to exploratioo. for reaching goals. reach then. lh:lerst.an:l lifestyle prefe ences am re late thsn to occupational interests. \\i:\u0026gt;rk with im i vidua 1 studen ts to discuss ~ tional interests. Level I Provide opportmities to discuss lifestyles am various occupat icna l interes ts with ccmn..ni ty lll!dlers . Level II 20  School Staff  Parents  C-JDity  Busioess/Iodust Assist staff to develop CUITiculllll that will help sttdents set career  goals am strategies to reach then. Assist staff to incorprate infornetion on varirus lifestyles am occupational interests into the c:urr icu lllll. Level III    Appendix I\\ A Syate Approach to Individual Learning and ' Developaent by Oenn is Van Oen lteuve 1 The pupil competencies in the preceding developmental plan are based upon the work of a number of developmental theorists. Appendix A presents a compilation from developmental theories of age-appropriate capabilities, skills, and behavior and the guidance need9 of cl1ildren and adolescents at the various developmental 3tages. r.-rging Physical Expected Age/Grade and Paychological Nicro-Syate llacro-Syatea Identifying Develoi-ntal Functional Sir.ilia General Guidance Level Capabi lilies Integration Integration Behaviors Correlates Repertoire Weeda ~ 1-4 -Sensory lll)tOr skills -lbfy awareness ~ -\u0026lt;llserving -Preaocial -IIMic p:,ysical lll)tor -Recognition of wic years differentiation skills security and support -Ba, ic recall/oerory -Se If-awareness I. Family -Testing p:,ysical -Iq,Jbive -Sensory knew ledge from primory and Prescrool -language -Security 2. Sibling, -Imitating ( l.oevi.nger) processing secoroarynw::ro-acquisition/ usage -Imitation and ~ -0,eying/ -SeMori.notor  la!J! -Self-control-systans ~ical motor skills nodeling styles conforming (Piaget) j:ilysical and social -Stinulatioo of -t1snaging bod i l y I. Child care micro-~st.8T!9 - lrlllgi.na t ion/ nnctioos adult -ttxleling -Psychological -~ling/ thrrug, inc identa 1 S)\u0026lt;IOO I ic inagery 2. Chi Id care survival usage am s true lured -Sin1\u0026gt; le cause- 111lt.eB -leorizing orientation, learning situations -\"Pre!tent\" time effa:tive ). Qilture p:,ysical -0.Jltural absorpti.\u0026gt;n provided thrrug, orientatioo relationships 4, Family and -labeling satisfaction necro-systans camulity (!'eslow) -Sense of obedience religirus -Immdiate and c~e of -Ba,ic and consist\"'1t lll)ral gratification -~sical rrorality behavior set of personal, orientation (Kohlberg) 90Cial, rultural, -AckncwledlJlell of am rroral paraieters -ICJnintegrated sources of established thrrus\n, 1cncwledge (Bloon) gratificatioo the nw::ro-syst..,.,, -Synt,olic play -Basic sense of fair -Reinforcerrent for (H!Jit) play inte \\lectua I and -Ol!:ni t ion 90Cial achievenEnts (OJi I ford) 21 Eaerging Physical Age/Grade 11!.1:pected and Psychological Micro-Syate llacro-Syate Identifying Deve loi-eota l Functional Skills General Guidance Level Capabi litiea Integration Integration Behaviors Correlates Repertoire Need  !,, 5-10 -Concre te operations -Jlmreness of Primary -Recogn1 zi.11,p, -concrete opeJ\"ations -Sense of fair play -Basic evaluation and )'1!8rS on reality self in social (Piaget) llllllitoring kill context l. Flllli ly Grade K-6 -5\u0026gt;'rllolic --ling -Social carpetition 2. School - Social nodeling and cooperation -Basic problem-oolv- representation am -Sense of J . ~rs -Short - term (Bandura) ing techniques to reflex knowledge coo fonni ty and predic ting -\\h:ler land the cope vi th inte lice tu- duty ~ -Self-protectiw, 111111ning of persona I al and social con- -Active nerory -Effec tive verbal coofonnist, expectation flicting situations -Awareness of l. Local cann..nicatioo opport.iiist ic -Effective language psychological comu,ity (u,evinger) -now the c riteria for i-Social ethics usage seU 2. Ne iij\\bort.ood -lru,iij\\t into self-evaluation J. Orurch, clubs causes of things -Safety, love, (i:tiysicsl and o-Basic learning tech- -Inventions of Sense of i:tiyical , -Socio- affection, intellectual) nique., and habits abstract coot,i.na- inte llectua 1 enconcmic -Im,ginll\\g belongingi,e.,s ti.on, and potency status (\"\"'low) -lfnowledge of t-AecotJ,i t ioo of sociA l assoc iAt ions --:Ultur~I -Olnvert ing authority and duty \"'4'POr t sys tan, Acclimation to -Qnler identifies- 30Cial, cultural httitase --Traru,fonmtion.9 ~formi ty. dl. ty. ( parents , schoo 1 social approval Responsibility for staff, chJrt-11, peers, tion atxl and gender -Group/ tean (l\u0026lt;ohlberg) I.earning aro1 soc iA 1 camu,ity, ,-,iijlbors) re lat i.onslnP\" stereotyping aeroership -\u0026lt;:onvergen t relationshi1Jt1 thinking ~n,hension, i'hyical Se 1f\" 1!0li tor ing responding (Bloem) Sense of persona 1 fa luate the qua Ii ty coordination -O\u0026gt;operating potency ( locus of of various '4Jport f)cpenled ~ry (Qiilford l cootrol) systalrl amreness of -0,eying C\u0026amp;\u0026gt;Se-1! ff ec t o-Effecuve intra- am rCoping skills for re lat ionshi ps -Role playing inter-persona 1 personal welfare\n-T\"\"'ral aria,- -Respon:J ing carm.nicat ioo i:tiYsical, intellec-talion to past- tual, social ard -Peroonal satis- o-Social adaptation : present-future Bllltional faction Iii.th 1 units of coofonnity learning ard and deviation -Social C\u0026lt;Jll!Ulication achieving Social nonm training -Labeling H-t,ral nonm -Ability to effective-- IdentifyinP, k)J l tura 1 nornl5 ly uti liz.e ard in- -terorizing Self-concept of ~ate various micro identity \u0026amp; co-support systea: 22 l\\ge/Grade Eloerging Physical Expected and Psychological Micro- System Macro-System ldentifyinr. Deve lopeen ta l Functional Level Skills General Guidance Capabilities Integration Integration Bebaviorn Correlates Repertoire - Needs .. l-\\g,, l!-14 -fonMl opPrations -ldentificatlon of Prizrery -React irtR -Initial formal Problmr-solving -Study Skills yc.ar-:i se If -cooccpt and operaticns techniques -Abstract \u0026amp; logical self-esteen in I. fsni ly -Revolting -Problmr-90lving brwtes 7-9 thtnl\u0026lt;i.ng fsni ly, school, I-Ind ividual \u0026amp; Sltua-- Application of processes peer contexts 2. Peer group -Screening tional role thinking content knowledge -Self-concept of (Piaget) -Clarification of per-tnt. el lectual an:l -Sense of potency J . School -Applying Sense of sonal, 90Ci.al an:l !0Cl81 identLty to lnflueoce -Validation of self- responsibility to religious value perSOMl an:l 14 . (a,mlll 1.) ....:lvtnei.ng efficacy se If an:! others in system -Initial intrO-'Jl\"Ction :,oc ia 1 systeJr\u0026lt;I 90Ci.al contexts an:l utilLzation of ~ -Sorting '-Se If -referent -tCnclwledae of sex reflex knowledge -Acknowl.edjJle,t tho.J81,t ( 8ondur a) Acti\"\"' ..,_ of self roles-iq,licationa of per90Ml lo.iltural an:l -.ll.l:lgi.ng and ,oc ia l esteem for educational/ -Tine-pro Jectill'C intellectual an:l status affL IL.a- -Social cognition 90Ci.al roles slu lls 90Cial tiO'l.'3 -coping Evaluation of self in capabilities -f'et.a-cogni ti\"\" per90Ml an:l 90Ci.al -f-it\u0026gt;ack on persona I -Sexuol identity -Local \"\"'1ia -ttxleling know ledge ( F lave 11 ) situaticn, achi\"\"\"\"\"\"'u am re90lutLon -Affiliation with \u0026amp; p:,htics perfoms,ce refereoce grrups -\u0026lt;ll\u0026lt;xlsing -lnterper90Ml Sense of cooperation -Local laws ca,cordaoce an:l collaboration -Ba lance between - Awareness of arY1 rrore., -Preparing cooper at ion an:l pararet.ers of (90Cial an:! -Esteen (Kohlherg) Self-m\u0026gt;tivation an:! i.rdepenlence i.ndepen:lence religious) -ValuinP, reinforcme.nt -Self -respec t/esteen techniques ,. -llecisiOIH!llking -Sex-role -Local -\u0026lt;:ater,orizing (l'laslowl processes orientation concepts of ~ ien t irusness Value identity an:l work and -Cl!lSsi fying ( lnevinger) rronitoring -Sense of contro I an:l product ,vity -0: stinr,uishinr, -Application, Sex-role orientation responsibility for -C-x,pcrat inr, vah~~BtJ11) per90na I behavior -=r t Guilford) -~1~~~ 2)  Faerging Phyeical Age/Grad, and Expected Peycho logica' !licro-Syate llacro-Syste ldentifyinc Develoi-eotal Functional Ski lle General Guidance Level Capabilities lntegrat ion Integration Behaviors Correla tee Repertoire lleede fv!t, 15-19 -Mature fonrsl -Awareness of year operations personal ~ Ac:.carrmdating -Fonno I ope rat ions -Responsibi hty for -Dec i iO\u0026lt;Hreking CPiaaet \u0026gt; personal decisions kill potencies I. Peer group lntcgratmg Grades -Abotract ond logical 2. Scoool/work -Synthesis/e valuatioo -Recognitioo of skills, -Goa 1-attai.nnent 10-12 thinking -Se lf-coocept in sett~ Projecting \"\"\"\"\"tency scaling various 90Cial 3. Friends -f\\n:twMl past- cootexts -Interacting --Organizatioo/ -Sense of self-evalua- -Effecti\"\" camuiica- pre.serit-future tine ~ Exchanging characteriz.at i.on t ion in var iou., tion perspecti\"\" -lnternaliz.at ion (Sloan) situation., -Psycoo-physical of values I. Fllllli ly -coping Self and ituatiooal h\u0026gt;UXlarous/ Persona 1 assertive- llllni to ring and integration -Eva luat ioo of 2. Social tatus -Nonaging integrated nes based oo evaluaticn -Per\"\"\" l potency to self in social (present \u0026amp; -Synthes lling ( Loevingerl \"\"\"\"\"tence and tecmiqu,,s act l4)00 concrete ccrttexts aspirations) -Se lf-actua lizati.on int.ere.st., and abstract klserti\"\"\"\"\" -Academic an:! - OJltural -Produ:: ing (Maslow) -COl 1.aboratioo, training realities social self- coofonnity/ -1.nve,ting cooperatioo skills to departure -{.ni\"\"rsal ethic -Problem-so 1v ing t\"flature 5)'!Ttlolic esteen -Creating (Kohlberg) achieve personal C'Clll!U'lication tecmiqu,,s -Awareness of -Gamulity goel in social -cm., lex ne, ta l shift fran groups -Evaluating -Eva luat ioo coot.ext -tlocro-sy tan pasi\"\" to -Social an:! -.Jwging ( OJ.i I ford) associations \u0026amp; -Ability to uti liz.e integratioo proacti\"\" religious past learning tecnii.q.es relationships ~ring projectioo 110res -Ability to project -ilecognitioo of self- -U,ique reality -\u0026lt;Dvernne,t -\u0026lt;ri tiquu,g esteem future goe ls/ coping style -11:\u0026gt;litics - 9.Jppor ting objective., -coping with -\u0026lt;:arpeti t ion 1R:ertainty an:! -f'edia cooflict -\u0026amp;oronics -Acces rules to persona I gr \"'1th and to soc ia I in-stitutions -Rites of passage 24   Appendix B ~m!ty Pm 11d Qddanoe Callllttee: A \u0026lt;bide for School c.om.elors School counselors have long recognized the need for coommity support in order for their programs to be effective. The ~lete cooperation of the aaninistration and faculty is also necessary. One method of linking the needs of the school and ccmDJnity with the guidance program is through the use of camunity-based guidance camittees. Such coomittees have been used successfully by many school programs and promise to be a potential solutioo to many of the problems facing counselors. This dOCI.IDel\"lt cootains important information for counselors atteq,ting to develop a guidance camittee. What is! guidance ccmnittee?  A guidance comnittee is ~ed of key l.aypen,ons and educators ~ provide lines of camunication bet\"Ween the school and the cOllll1Jl'lity, thereby assisting the COLnSelor in wilding sound programs based upon student needs and camunity needs. There are at least~ major types of guidance ccmnittees. Smaller school districts may have one type, \\olhile larger districts might possibly have both. The first type of a guidance c00111ittee is a cauprehensive district-wide com:nittee. The second type is a wilding (school) level cxmnittee. The makeup of both C01J111ittees \"'1ld be similar, including teachers, a!ininistrators, parents, representatives of b.lsiness and industry, and students  What is the purpose of~ guidance camittee? The primary ?J.rpose of a guidance coomittee is to do what cannot be dooe effectively by the guidance staff alone. The CXX11Dittee seeks to emphasize the creation of a program that constantly strives to better serve the student, teachers, parent and school administration, as well as the coom.mity. The cannittee extends the arms of the guidance pi.-ogram into the school and the COIIIJU'lity, expands the potential for a greater production of ideas and resoorces, and increases the mnber of workers and leaders available to carry rut programs and projects. Since the COOJDittee is ~sed of a variety of interest groups, it serves to keep the lines of camunication open between these groups and the school. The use of a guidance comDittee should result in a rwre active and productive guidance program. How can! guidance camittee help school counselors? Guidance camittees can help counselors to effectively meet the needs of students in many ways. A guidance comnittee can uniquely solve problems that a counselor might be unable to on his/her own. It can be very helpful in keeping a guidance program current, monitoring new camunity trends and other local needs. It provides advice and counsel regarding the development and maintenance of meaningful programs. The C01111ittee can help develop rationale for new and expanded career guidance programs. It can develop a line of support for the counselor both within and wi.thoot the school, providing assistance in the area of public rel.ations--getting infonnation aboot the program to the media, sclx\u0026gt;ol patrons and the rest of the camunity. The members of the caJJDittee can provide liaison, with coorruni.ty leaders, professionals or 0rganizations \\olhich can assist in meeting the objectives of the guidance ~rogram. 25 Appendix B (continued) The guidance C0111Dittee serves to iq\u0026gt;rove channels of C0lllll.ll'licatia, between the camunity to the guidance staff. It can help transmit infomation about the services and contributions of the guidance program. Leadership for varirus  guidance projects, such as a career day, can result from the work of guidance coanittees. The guidance C011111ittee serves as an instnnent for developing a greater awareness of the need for aCCOlrltability--encouraging and assisting the continuous evaluatioo of the guidance program. The guidance C0111Dittee can aid the guidance staff in the developnent of a cauprehensive plan for guidance in the school a:rv:J/or district by assisting the counselors with conducting needs assessments, writing objectives and in plaming for program evaluation. By having the broad base a comnittee provides, guidance programs can becane roore respoosive and accountable to all the publics they serve. \\illo should be included in the coanittee? \\ollile there is no single set of criteria for the sel~ction of camnittee members, reasons for selection should include: personal interest in the effectiveness of the guidance progran they will be advising, available time to attend scheduled and special meetings in order to carry out camittee business and respoosibilities, and a general willingness to provide counsel in a manner that will support the general guidance needs of all students rather than the special interests of specific cx:mnittee members. f.ertain me!llbers of the camiittee may be chosen for their expertise in certain are.as such as testing, social work or personlel worlc as the need arises. As stated above, the size and ~ition of coamittees will vary according to type and size of the school or district served. For example, a K-6 elementary school guidance camittee could include a primary and intennediate  level teacher, the principal ard/or assistant principal, parents of both I. primary and intermediate level children, representatives fran local business and industries. Additionally, other pupil persomel service groups, junior high counselors, social welfare or mental health agencies could also be represented. Secondary level ccmnittees will have similar caupositioos and might also include representatives of postsecondary institutions within the COUIJlll'lity. The size of tOOSt school comnittees ranges frooi eight to 12 members. District level comnittees often include one counselor fran each level (or all if a small district), the district's director of guidance (or \u0026amp;binistrator in charge of guidance), a principal ft\"OOI each level, a teacher frcn each level, parents, students, representatives of business or industry, other pupil personnel groups and members of social action or mental health agencies. Additionally, local colleges and military recruiters might have representatives on the coomittee. If the district is in a faming ccmiunity, at least one farmer should be included in the camnittee. If there is a da!linant industry in that ccmamity, a representative of that industry should be included in the comnittee membership. The size of a district coamittee could range fran about eight in a very small district to over 20 in a large district. The building level guidance ccmnittee should be appointed by the principal with input frcn the guidance staff, loihi le district level guidance C001Dittees are appointed by the superintendent with input from the director of guidance  26    Append ix 8 (continued) The coomittee should then elect a chairperson fran its lay membership. The ~election of the chairperson is very critical, as this person will work very closely with the guidance staff and a\u0026lt;hinistration in planning the 1o0rk of the CO'llllittee. The school's COU'lSelor or the district's director of guidance will serve as an a-officio secretary to supervise the preparation of minutes, correspondence, etc. What is the counselor's role in the camiittee's operation? The recognized need for a guidance comnittee, the approval for developing a guidance conmittee and the selection of members to the guidance ccmnittee should orginate frOOl the counselors or professional staff of the school. The guidance comnittee will need help in its efforts to locate, define, clarify and select areas of need that can be trans lated into objectives, goals, programs and projects. The cau:nittee wi 11 need assistance in bringing together materials and resources available to the ccmnittee in pursuing program objectives and in developing techniques for evaluating its 1o0rk. As ex-officio secretary of the coamittee, the counselor 111lSt provide this support to the camiittee. The guidance staff ID.l8t take the initiative in developing a cohesive group in which the participation of all members is desired and sought. The counselors ID.JSt also be prepared to assume the responsibility for the actions of the comnittee, the direction in which it goes and intensity with which it pursues a goal. The staff llllSt provide clerical, mailing and other support services for the camiittee. How are meetings scheduled and conducted? At. least NO full coomittee meetings should be held per year with the counselors aoo/or the camiittee having the option of calling mre if needed. Generally, each meeting should have a specific agenda. The counselors in consultation with the chairperson should set the agenda for each meeting. Generally, the first meeting of the year should include an orientation to the school guidance program. Other meetings should address various program needs aoo projects. Finally, this should be a 1o0rking comnittee. ththing can cut short the enthusiasm of the members than to be a part of a non-functioning, \"in-nameonly\" carmittee. Members of the CC111Dittee should be recognized for their contributions publicly. News releases can help give the needed publicity to the comnittee -urk. \"'1hat are~ problems associated with the use of guidance caxmittees? Qiidance comnittees do not always function smoothly. Some coom:,n problems associated with the use of comnittees often include a tendency to want to set policy rather than assist, a lack of understanding of the total functioning of a school, a lack of perspective, an inability to see the program as a whole. The consunption of staff time in providing materials for the C01DJ1ittee, preparing for mailings, preparing minutes and writing reports can also be a problem  27 Appendix 8 (continued) Good selection procedures and orientation are the best way to overcane these probl~. The administrators and counselors are employees of the board  of education. They should listen very carefully to their coamittee, but not sucCUDb to bad advice. They tD.JSt take responsibility for helping the coomittee understand and adhere to board policies, remembering that an advisory coarnittee is siq\u0026gt;ly what the name suggests--advisory. Their function is to help provide accountability and camunity feedback to the progrm. The school is responsible for hearing the camittee's advice and honesty and openly weighing that advice in light of current constraints, resources, etc. 28     Appendix C NIDllCAN saDI. \u0026lt;XINiEUlt ASSCX:IATI\u0026lt;JC (ASCA) PelilTI\u0026lt;JC STATIN!N'l' 1he School Con,e lor md the Qddance and Comselq Plogr. Intrcxb:tim This position of the American School Counselor Association (ASCA) describes the elements of a caoprehensive and developmental guidance and counseling program and the criteria upon which the quantity and responsibilities of qualified, differentiated staff members is based. lhe ASCA statements of counseling role and function for the elementary, middle/ junior high, secondary and postsecondary settings are an integral part of the design and implementation of guidance and counseling programs. fhi~ ''\\,h\n:) am I?\" \"who can I becaoe as a person?\" and \"HcM can I best contribute to society?\" are questions which quidance and crunseling programs help all individuals to answer. In their design and operation, guidance and counseling programs exist to i~rove the learning enviroroent by involving students, staff, parents, C001Il.111ity and others who influence the learning and development of the persons served by the program. Through individual and group contacts over a period of time, the counselor has a major role in helping all persons develop more adequate and realistic concepts of themselves, becane aware of educational and occupational opportunities and integrate their understanding of self and opportunities in making informed decisions. PrugtM Galls A guidance and counseling program provides for direct involvement of a service to students, staff and coom.mity in order to facilitate achievement of the following program goals. Assists persons in developing: 1. A better understanding and acceptance of themselves\ntheir strengths and limitations\naptitudes, needs, values, interests and worth as unique individuals\n2. Interpersonal relationships on the basis of ID.ltual respect\n3. Problem solving and decision making\n4. Accepting increased responsibility for their educational, occupational and avocational development. Standards These standards are set forth in a manner which allows local school districts, institutions, agencies and others to design and implement guidance and counseling programs consistent with the unique needs found within each setting. 29 Append ix C ( cont irrued) Ptc.t 1. There is a written guidance curriculLDD developed by counselors and with  the involvement of appropriate others, specifying the overall guidance and counseling program as it involves and relates to the needs of the person in the school, institution, agency and c00111.J11ity. 2. The basic program of guidance and coLD1seling involves the process of consulting, providing information and coordinating services for all students. The program is ccq\u0026gt;rehens i ve, deve lo?J)!1ta l and is imp lenented through the guidance curricultn and through specialized approaches. Orientation, information, appraisal, placement, follow-up, follow-through, referral and research activities are included in the program. 3. There is evidence that all persons throughout the school, institution, agency and coomJ11ity have on-going opportunity to par t icipate in the guidance and counseling program. 4. There is evidence that the guidance and counseling program is systematically planned, i~lemented and evaluated. 5. There is evidence that the guidance and counseling program may be continued on an extended basis during periods -.hen classes are not in session as deemed appropriate for each school district, institution or agency. \\.,hen each school district, institutioo or agency deans that these additional services are desired, counselors should be appropriately compensated. 6. The guidance and counseling program should be cCllmll\"lity oriented. If  services are to be provided to preschoolers, dropouts, graduates and other , coom.mity citizens, additional staffing needs to be provided. 7. CcA.Jnselor-taught or initiated LD1its in decision making, values clarification, career planning, test taking/study skills and/or similar tD1its are offered. 8. The guidance and counseling program serves three-to five-year-old children and their parents -.here pre-elementary school settings exist and there is an existing elementary guidance and counseling program. 9. The guidance and counseling program provides other innovative service(s) or activities ...tlich are designed to meet lD'lique needs. St:aff ASCA holds the position that appropriate m.lDbers of staff shall be employed to i~lement a guidance and counseling program designed to meet the needs of the persons involved in tne program. There is a direct correlation be~en the quantity and quality of guidance counseling services and the mnber to provide that service. 1. The guidance and counseling staff is qualified and appropriately certified/licensed according to state agency standards. 2. The guidance and counseling staff is responsible for the design, implementation anrl evaluatioo of the services and activities prescribed in the program. 30   Appendix C (continued) 3. Professional, secretarial and/or paraprofessional staff are adequate in rnnbers to meet the objectives of the guidance and counseling program. 4. Provision is made for staff to attend or participate in intra and inter-professional meetings and activities inside and outside the state. Facilities Appropriate and meaningful guidance and counseling activities with individuals and groups take place in a wide variety of settings, the specific environnent often being detemined by circunstances. There are, however, continuing student, program and staff needs in which privacy and confidentiality of conversation and records require specific counseling facilities. 1. Each counselor is provided with pleasant, private quarters conducive to conferences of a confidential nature and adequate in size to accoomodate three to five persons. 2. The counseling facilities are located in an area readily accessible to students and others. 3. Each C01.D1Selor's quarters is equipped with adequate telephone service. 4. A conveniently located area adequate for group guidance and counseling activities is available. 5. Adequate provision is made for the storage and display of all records and materials used by the counselor(s) in carrying out the guidance and counseling program. 6. Career resource center(s) are established and appropriately staffed to facilitate use of career awareness, exploration, planning, preparation and progression of materials, equipment and supplies. Mllt.erlals and Bquii-erit There is adequate budget for purchasing, maintaining and developing the materials and equii:xnent necessary to achieve the objectives of the guidance and counseling program. Adopted 1974\nreviewed and reaffinned 1980\nrevised 1986 31 Appendix D Aaeri.c.an School Comae lor Aeeocf.atiaa (ASCA) Poeltiaa Statment 1he School Colnse lor and lleelopaental Qddanoe Luring recent years a m.nber of counselor educators and school counselors have advanced the proposition that c'JUOseling can and should becooie tD:\u0026gt;re proactive and preventative in its focus and llX)re developmental in its content and process. Viewed in the context of an evolving societal emphasis upon personal growth and an expanding professional expertise , developmental guidance has resulted in a potentially dynamic and prcxnisi~ c1pproach to the helping relationship of the school counselor. The concept of developmental guidance has been discussed under various rubrics, such as (deliberate) psychological education, h\\nan relations training and preventive mental health. Develonental guidance is reaffirmation and actualization of the belief that guidance is for all students and that its purpose is to maximally facilitate personal develonent. Definition  Develonental guidance is that caoponent of all guidance efforts lolhich fosters planned interventioo within educational and other human development . services program.5 at all points in the human life cycle. It vigorously still1llates and actively facilitates the total development of individuals in all areas--personal, social, emotional , career, rooral-ethical, cognitive, aesthetic--and to praoote the integration of the several canponents into an individual lifestyle. fndor8CM!Dt The American School Counselor Association (ASCA) formally endorses, supports and encourages the incorporation of developmental guidance in the role and function of the school counselor. Antee :ecients In the past the role of the schcx\u0026gt;l counselor has suffered Eran the restrictions of historical precedent, philosophical tradition, financial support, achinistrative definition, and counselor selection and preparation. Counselor functions have often been limited to crisis management, adjustment coordinatioo, vocational guidance, and clerical and quasi-administrative tasks. Catalysts Pr~ted by cultural change, progressive philosophy, advancement of knowledge and methodological improvement in the behavioral sciences, a climate of open public discourse, pressures of educational accountability,  institutional ecunanics, and professional survival, the \"traditional\" ~rk of the scl':\u0026gt;ol COLTI\u0026amp;elor is in need of well-seasoned revisioo. 32   Appendix D (continued) Direction If counseling is vie-wed humanistically, holistically and canprehensively--that is, developmentally--then the rationale for develoinental guidance is clearly defined : cOll'lseling should be habilitative as well as rehabilitative, proactive as well as reactive, preventative as well as remedial, skill-additive as well as problem-reductive and characterized by outreach as well as availability. Developmental guidance is the S\\IIIDative terminology which connotes this E!fll)hasis. Specifically, then, developmental guidance refers to the process and content of confluent human development as prOOJOted by planned, ~rposeful and sequential intervention. Content The content of developmental guidance will vary according to the developmental levels, stages and needs of participants\ncounselor carpetence and resources\nand other factors. Examples of programs of contemporary interest include the follOJing: tn.man development (theories, stages, tasks, principles)\ncareer develonent (awareness, exploration, selection, employability skills)\nacademic development (achievement motivation, study skills, test preparation, test wiseness)\ncoom.mication skills\ninterpersonal relations\ndecision making\nvalues clarification\nmarriage and family planning\nparent education\nmoral development\naffective education\nconflict resolution\nleadership training\nassertion training\nrelaxation training\nhuman sexuality\ndrug education\ndeath education\nand situational adjusonent and self-management (divorce adjustment, depression management, weight control, behavior modification). This list is not exhaustive. lntervent: ion Many means and resources for developmental guidance intervention are available, and counselors should select fr\u0026lt;XD among these alternatives according to needs identified in his or her work situation. Examples of means ol:: delivery include : mini-courses, academic release time \"from designated classes for developmental guidance activities, curricular scheduling of guidance activities, extended hours (after school and evening,) and classroan guidance. Ex.:uq:\u0026gt;les of techniques and resources include : resource centers and libraries\nprogramned texts and workbooks\nco-facilitation and consultation with teachers\nparaprofessionals, peer counselors, and others\ncounseling and educational kits\ncurricular aids, media, bibliotherapy, cinematherapy\ncontracting\nand experiential education. Examples of strategies include : direct service delivery, consultation, team teaching, peer facilitating and paraprofessional counseling. Medi.ta of Delivery In terms of efficiency, as well as effectiveness, group approaches are the preferred medium of delivery for developmental guidance activities. By definition, \"group\" refers to a natural or created cluster of individuals, as small in mnber as two or of lD'llimited size. The clusters may be identified as families, cl.assror:xns and grades, employees, clients or other canposites of persons who cane together as a result of shared need or purpose, COIIIDOn attributes and/or other coincident characteristics. 33 Appendix D (continued) COllpeteocies Essential preparation for develo.xnental guidance intervention involves a  thorough understanding of hunan development (descriptive and theoretical)\nknowledge of counseling t,heory and pr act ice\ncaupetence in COLD1Seling techniques and group processes\nskill in program develo.xnent and management\nassessment, appraisal and diagnostic skills based on developmental concepts\npractical canpetence in basic statistics, applied research and program evaluation methods\nand specific knowledge in the area of developmental emphasis. The ca.mselor should be personally effective and comfortable in all areas in which developmental guidance intervention is offered. Develo(Xl)ental guidance specialists llJJSt, at a minillUD, be able to effectively deal with questions such as : what are the general characteristics, expectations, tasks and behaviors of individuals at this state of development? What are this individual's characteristics , expectat i ::x-1s , tasks and behaviors? What can impede the process of develo(Xl)ent for thi_s individual? \\oh.at will facilitate the process of develofXl)ent for this individual? Because the emphasis oo develo(Xl)ental guidance is fairly new, cCU1Selor educators may need to roodify the counselor education curriculum in order to prepare ca.mseling students as proficient developmental interventionists. Because such an approach has often been taught as an ideal rather than as reality, as an attitude instead of a skill, counselor educators may be required to further develop their educative role. Counseling students should seek to add the skills of develo(Xl)ental guidance intervention to their repertoire--if necessary, through adjuncts and (. _.. alternatives to the usual counselor education curricula. Practicing counselors ~ _ whose programs did not include developmental guidance coo:iponents should seek to acquire the skills of develoixrental guidance intervention as part of their professional renewal efforts . The developmental guidance counselor should be involved in a continuing program of professional improvement in developmental guidance expertise and strategies. ~tencies may be acquired. maintained and improved through a variety of means, for example, graduate study, loQrkshops, institutes and seminars, meetings and programs of professional associations, self-study of journals, contemporary texts and instructional manuals, in-service education, continuing and extended education, inteniships, and consultation. Iaplemntatial Many administrators, teachers, other school personnel, students and parents will be unaccustomed to the concept, intent and outcane of develofXl)ental guidance\ntherefore, the counselor's competence nust be visible\nprogram develoinei,t and planning thorough\nrationale for programs convincing\nconduct of procedures professional\nand programs ~ured, evaluated and reported effectively, both formally and informally. Implementation strategies for the initiation of develofXDental guidance will  require both asfertiveness and ingenuity. The entire guidance coommity, ASCA and its constitue:-.t organizations should strive to loQrk in harroony to facilitate th2 i~lementatim of developmental guidance programs.   Appendix D (continued) The true impact of the develOfOental guidance concept loses meaning when discussed as a lofty goal, abstract concept or as an isolated piece of rhetoric. For the concept of a sequential and develoinental guidance program to be truly meaningful to both the professional staff as well as parents and students, it tDJSt be part of a c~rehensive K-12 guidance plan. A plan which states its aims in measurable outcomes for all students, specific activities and a built-in evaluation procedure with provisions for necessary annual revisions. ' There is a necessity for some fonn of needs assessment which addresses the legitimate needs of the entire school cOOJru11ity. The counselor needs to be realistic in evaluating time and fiscal parameters. A curriculum for each grade level or special area is then developed, implemented, assessed and revised annually. In-service education needs to be considered when necessary. School counselors need to develop their abilities to teach the attitudes necessary to enhance the academic success of their counselees\ni.e., for a student to succeed in geooietry, the student needs more than the usual mathematical concepts. In addition, they need to deal with structure, boredan, intimidation and frustration. The plan should be presented to the appropriate educational agency for adoption. The effects of a written ~rehensive K-12 guidance plan helps the consumer to realistically become aware of the goals, objectives and true roles of their local guidance department. Cbidelines There are several general principles which should help insure quality and effectiveness in the implementatiCl1 of develoinental guidance: 1. The program should be systematic, sequential and cauprehensive. 2. The program should be jointly founded upon developmental psychology, educational philosophy and counseling methodology. 3. Both process and product (of the program itself and the individuals in it) should be stressed. 4. All the personal dooiains--cognitive, affective, behavioral, experiential and envirorniental--should be emphasized. 5. Programs should emphasize preparation for the future and consolidation of the present. 6. Individualization and transfer of learning should be central to program procedure and method. 7. Evaluation and corrective feedback are essential. Adopted, 1978\nreviewed and revised 1984 35 Appendix E DRZS Kit llBlrlfYDI\nRliSl.BLI QWII Ol PlN\u0026gt;UE taK:1.ESIN!llrATICB Printed Sources Amual Register of Grant Support: A Directory of 1'\\nU.~ Sources. Qdcago: Marquis Profealonal fublicatlone. 1985. Contains large section oo grants in education (pp. 4fJ7-67) in the areas of: Educational Projects and Research, General\nElementary and Secondary \u0026amp;iucation\nHigher Edur....ation Projects and Research\nand Scoolar Aid Programs. Also lists funding sources ifl th..? broad areas of: Humanities, International Affairs and Are.a Studies\nSpecial Populations\nScience\nSocial Sciences\nPhysical Sciences\nLife Sciences\nand Technology and Industry. 'Die Fomdatioo Directory. New Yodt: 1be Fcamdation Center. 1985. Standard source for identifying foundations\narranged by state, and indexed by foundation name, geographic areas of funding, types of support , and subject. 'lbe 1983-84 ~ of Grant Halting Fcamdations With Aaaets of Over $1.000.000 or Grants of \u0026lt;\u0026gt;Yer $100,000. Harteda.le. NY: Public Service Materials Center, 1982. Surveys principal f~dations in tenn.5 of : when to apply for grants, geographic restrictioos, how to apply for funds, in lolhat fields grants are awarded, and prospects for funding. \\here laeric.a's Large F\u0026lt;ll.Ddatioos Hake 'Ibeir Grmts. 8art:9dale, NY: fublic Service NaterW.a Center. 'This is the !IX)St ccxq:\u0026gt;lete representative record ever published giving the specifics of grant-making by leading foundations in this COlD1try. Includes over 650 foundations in every part of the natioo, most with assets of $10,000,000 or more.\" How to Write Soccessful Corporate Appeals. With Pull ~les. 8artadale, NY: Public Service Nateriala Center. \"James Sinclair, a leading authority on corporate fund raising, opens his   files to reveal all his secrets of writing successful appeals to  corporations--and provides you with an extraordinary range of grant\nnnring samples.\" 36    Appendix E (continued) 'Die Cmpl.eb! Qri.de To Corporate 11\\ni la.laing. Hartedale, NY: Public Service Hatertal.s c.enter  \"To begin with, this book is a superb technical manual. You will never again wooder how or ~t you should do to win corporate support. Special sections of the book tell you how to raise corporate funds if you are a l.D'liversity or hospital, a rultural institution, an advocacy organization, social service agency, or smaller institution.\" 1he Corporate Fmd Ra.is~ Directory. Hartsdale, NY: Public Service Materials r.enter. \"Now accurate up-to-date inforamtion is available on the huge $3.5 billioo grant-making program o~ America's top corporations. Here you can find out ..iho to approach at e.ach corporation, primary areas of giving, typical grants, special insights and other vital information.\" New Ways to Saroeed With Fa.niatims: A Qlide for the Reagarl Years. Hartadale, Ill: Public Service Nateriala Cent.er. \"Joseph Deamer has written an important new book designed to help nonprofit organizations not only survive the Reagan years, rut to grow stronger through increased foundation support. le is the first book that provides specific strategies for different ncnprofit institutioos to understand during the next two years in approaching foundations.\" Holl To Ge(: GoYenaent Grant.e. Hartsdal.e, NY: Public Service Hatertal.s Center. . \"Finally, there is a book describing in simple, straight forward language how yCA.Ir institution should go aboJt securing govetTeOtal grants--fran yCA.Ir first organizational step to the final accounting of how your institution spent the funds.\" Federal Ft.ming Glide for Kle.entary aid Secxndary ll'docatioo. ~. OC: Fd.JcatiM Ptmd~ Research Cancll, 1980. Provides overview of the Department of I-.:ducatioo and federal aid to education in general, as well as new eligibility requirements and 1980 budget allocations. ' Federal aid programs are divided into broad areas: educationally disadvantaged children, impact, vocational educatioo, cultural programs, shared revenues, etc. 1he Casebook: Aid-To-Mlcatioo Prugnw of Lead~ Business Q:ocems. New Yorlt: C-Oic,cf 1 for 1\"'1rwrfa1 Aid to \u0026amp;tocatian, 1978. M cngoing report that ~iles details on the aid-to-education activities of saDe corporations active in this field that are willing to let others know lolhat types of programs they support and how. 37 Append ix E ( cont irrued) EUil PlinUng Soun:es lll!lillletter. lboeob:~ Willi.a and Betty Wil.aan, 1978-~t:e. K:,nthly reference newsletter for elementary, secondary and special education, with infomation en federal, state, f~tion and corporate grants. Fomdatim Ji'tnd ntalJI: A Chide for Grantseeken. New Yorlt: 'lhe li'omdet ian Center, 1981 . Qiide by Carol M. Kurzig, designed to help both novice and experienced grantseekers beccme more familiar with the 1oK\u0026gt;rld of tcuidations. Goverrment Docunents Catalog of Federal Donx\u0026gt;estic Assistance (annual). Federal Grants and Contracts Weekly. Catalog of Federal Education Assistance Programs (1980). ED 1.29:980 Application for Grants Under Training Personnel for the Education of the Handicapped. ED 1.2 :T 68/5 Instructions and Application for Grants Under the Special Needs Program. ED 1.2:SP 3/2 Application for Grants Under the Secretary's Discretionary Program. ED 1.2:SE 2/986 Application for Grants Under Secondary Education and Transitional Services for Handicapped You th. ED 1.2:SE 1/986 Application for Grants Under the Secretary's Discretionary Program for Mathematics, Science, Canputer Leaming and Critical Foreign Languages. ED 1.2:M 42/2/986 Application for Grants Under Magnet Schools Assistance Program. ED 1.2:M 27/986 Application for Grants Lnder Handicapped Oli ldren 's F.arly Education Program, Demonstration and Auxiliary Activities Projects. ED 1.2:H 19/5 Application for Grants Under the Endc:MDE!S1t Grant Program. ED 1.2:~ 2/3   Application for Grants. Supplemental Funds Program for Cooperative FAfucation.  ED 1.2:C 78/3 ... Application for Granes Under the Cooperat ~ve Education Program. ED 1.2:C 78/2 )8    Append ix E (continued) On-line Sources Fomdatioo Di.rectory. On-line equivalent of the hard copy directory. Fomdatim Gamts ID:ies. Contains information on grants awarded by more than 400 major American philanthropic foundations, representing all records fran the Fc,.mdation Grants Index section of the bimonthly Foondation News. QWIIS. Source to more than 4,000 grants offered by federal, state and local goverrments, comnercial organizations, associations, and private foundations. All grants included carry application deadlines up to six months ahead. Mat ional Fomdat ions. Provides records of all 22,100 lhited States foundations liolhich award grants, regardless of the assets of the foundation. Many smaller funding sources not listed in the Foundations Directory may be found here. Other Sources of Information Federal Infonnatioo Centers U.S. General Services Administration 18th and F Sts., N.W. Washington, OC 20405 (202) 566-1937 The Foundation Center 888 7th Ave. New York, NY 10106 (212) 975-1120 (800) 424-9836 39 Appendix F ODD SIJRZS CW QWll'S AND Plll\u0026gt;DE Address Rockefeller Foundation 308 East Eighth St. Little Rock, AR 72202 (S01) 376-6854 The American Association for Counseling and Develoixnent FOlD'ldation 5999 Stevenson Ave. Alexandria, VA 22304 Arkansas State Recognition Program Arkansas Department of Education Career Education Mini-Grants Arkansas Department of Education Carnegie Corporation of New York 437 Madisoo Ave. New York, NY 10022 (212) 371-3200 The Field Foundation, Inc. 100 East 85th St. New York, NY 10028 (212) 535-9915 William T. Grant Foundation 919 Third Ave. New York, NY 10022 (212) 752-0071 lttleson Foundation, Inc. 14 East 60th St., Suite 704 New York, NY 10022 (212) 838-S010 W.K. Kellogg Foundation 235 Porter St. Battle Creek, Ml 49016 (616) 966-2000 The Ford Foundation 320 East 43rd St. New York, NY 10017 Deadline Four Times a Year Dec. ,Mar. ,June,Sept. Decenber February Spring All Year All Year All Year All Year Early Fall Spring and Fall Additional infonnation is available in The Foundation Directory available in most public libraries. 40       Appendix G PINliOO Ml\u0026gt; KVALLII\\Tl\u0026lt;lt RISlRJlS Collison, B. B. Needs assessment for guidance program planning: a procedure. The School Counselor, November 1982, 30(2), ~15-21. Conducting ~ Needs Assessment. Highlights .. an ERIC/CAPS Fact Sheet. Ann Arbor, MI: ERIC/CAPS, 1982. Dameron, J. D., ed. The Professional Colmselor: Callpetencies, Performance Guidelines and Assessment. Alexandria. VA: AA.CD, 1980. Diamcnd, E. E. Development of the Joint Camiittee Standards for evaluations of educational programs, projects and materials. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Develof:CDE.Ot, July 1985, 18(2), 51-57. F.pperson, D. L. and Pecnik, J. A. Counselor Rating Form--short version : further validation and cooiparison to the long form. Journal of Counseling Psychology, January 1985, Bill, 143-6. Hayden, C. and Pohlmann, N. Accountability and evaluation : necessary for the survival of guidance programs? NASSP Bulletin, October 1981, 66(447), 29-33. Healy, C. C. suggestions. Formative evaluation in career education : problems and Jrurnal of Career Education, December 1982, 9(2), 134-4U. Kelly, F. R., Jr. and Ferguson , D. G. Elementary scrool guidance needs asssessment : a field-tested rocx:lel. Elementary School GJidance and Counseling, February 1984, .!!Ll2_, 176-80. Lewis, J. D. Q.i idance program evaluation : how to do it. The School Colmselor, November 1983, l!..Q.2_, 111-9. Lanbana, J. H. Q.iidance accountability: a new look at an old problem. The School Counselor, Hay 1985, 32(5), 340-6. Maher, C. A. and Bennett, R. E. Planning and Evaluating Special Education Services. EnglE.\"wOOCl Clitfs, NJ : ?rentice-ltiil, 1984 . 4 I Appendix G (continued) Matczynski, T. J. and Rogus, J. Needs assessment: a means to clarify the goals  of secondary schools. rwiSP Bulletin, January 1985, 69(477), 34-40. Wiggins, J. D. Steps to take in evaluating a school's guidance program. NA.SSP Bulletin, October 1981, 66(447), 29-33. Wysong, H. E. Needs Assessment in Counseling Qiidance, and Personnel Services. Searcii!Ight bibliograpny. Ann Harli:\u0026gt;r, Ml: ElUC/CAPS, 1983. A Qiide for the Development of a Counselor Evaluatioo Plan, ASCA, 1981. 42   a Care Paekage for ne-w  eletnentarY, counselors Indiana Department of Education Division of IIuman SerYiccs / Pupil Personnd Services October, 1984 A \"CARE PACKAGE\" fOR NEW ELEMENTARY COUNSELORS Every counselor at one time or another is a \"new\" counselor. ft may he that very first counseling joh or it may be a new school assir.nment that the corporation has maJe. Maybe it's a new job in a Ji ffercnt school system or another state and maybe it's the request o[ the counselor to experience a different school setting or n Jifferent counseling situation. And maybe it's the beginning o [ a ne,, program in a corpora ti on that has never had an elementary counselor. No matter what the reason, there will be a time and maybe several times when a counselor is given the task of establishing a new counseling program in a school. It's an exciting time, challenging the counselor to use every possible resource to communicate to his/her public the role of the counselor. To assist elementary counselors in this responsibility, the following \"Care Package\" has been developed. Although there arc numerous ways to communicate this information, the purpose of the \"Care Package\" is r.o provide samples of ideas and methods for establishing the role of the counselor. Classroom guidance presentations, letters and suggestions are included along with a step-by-step plan for organizing the counseling program. Improvising anJ adapting this package with the counselors own skills, abilities, and resources is both expected and encouraged. Sections: I. 11:-ive a Statement [I. In the Beginning 11 I. .rust [or Kids IV. Communicating with Parents V. ~lanaging and Organizing Your Time 1 SECTION I !lave a Statement: rrom this section one should be able to answer two basic quest ions. \"Why have an elementary gui\u0026lt;lance program?\" and \"\\'Jhat docs an elementary counselor do 7 \" It is valuable for administrators in every school corporation to have a written statement answering those two most basic questions. Rationale Philosophy Objectives Role Goals function o matter what words one wants to use to answer these questions, these samples of how others have handled the task might be helpful. Included are: A. Counselor Education Program Objectives B. Statements from House of Representative Bill S477 - September 28, 1979 C. American School Counselor Association's Position !'aper D. A school corporation's program description 2 - COUNSELOR EDU CATI ON PROGRAM OBJECTIVES FOR THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL COUNSELOR (TENTATIVE) Nelson and Segrist Purdue University In preparation for counseling and guidance activities, the counselor reaches out toward children: a. Talks about his program in classrooms. h. Brings small groups of younger children to his office to familiarize them with the setting and the selfreferral process. c. Develops and maintains friendly, informal contact in such settings as the halls, playground, lunchroom. d. Participates with children in appropriate, informal ways, such as engaging in games with them. The counselor engages in individual counseling: a. h. C. d. e. f. g. h. 1. J . k. l. m. Is informed in the area of counseling theory. Demonstrates use of a variety of counseling approaches. Produces comfort in the child. Arranges a comfortable, familiar environment. Engages the child in discussion of appropriate topics. Encourages the child to discuss his concerns. Facilitates expression by the child. lle1ps the child to understand his concerns and place them into perspective. Confronts the child, as appropriate, about his selfdefeating, inappropriate modes of problem solving. At the same time, provides minimal leads for the child. Helps the child to develop plans for appropriate action. Is alert to the child's avoidance behaviors. Is able to terminate counseling relationships leaving the door open for further discussion. The counselor engages in group counseling and guidance: a. Ts informed in the area of group counseling theory. h. Is able to incorporate different theoretical models. c. Encourages voluntary group formation. d. Arranges the formation of appropriate groups. e. Functions in group formation so that readiness to share is an expectation of group members. f. Helps to develop in the group a \"we\" feeling. g. Helps to develop in the group an expectation that all may help a child and all may receive help. h. Is willing and able to intervene in the interests of developing a setting in which children expect to work on concerns. 1. Is ahle to help the group develop problem solving approaches. J. encourages confidentiality. k. llclps group me:mbers to focus on particular is~ues. 1. Encourages the group to examine its own interactive processes. 3 The counselor consults with teachers, parents, and children: 3. Is informed in the area of consulting theory. h. Inspires confidence in those with whom he consults. c. Demonstrates a willingness to consult with others. \u0026lt;l. Develops a cooperative atmosphere rather than a superior-subordinate relationship. e. runctions so as to elicit teacher, parent, etc., responses toward the child which are enhancing. f. Is willing to make specific suggestions where appropriate. g. Helps teachers and others develop programs to meet the needs of children. h. Is willing and able to confront those using procedures which seem antithetical to progress. 1. Is able to contribute to deeper understanding of children by adults and accepts the need to gain from other adults in his own understanding. J Conducts case conferences relevant to concerns about children. The counselor is a participant in producing change in the school environment: a. Informs himself about the environment. h. Searches out environmental effects upon students. c. Confronts environmental problems as necessary. d. Considers and incorporates changes in his own program where necessary. The counselor engages in research and evaluation: a. Seek-\nto determine the effects of his own program. h. Seeks to determine the problems affecting students and teachers. c. Seeks to understand the specific setting in which he is involved. cl. Designs experimental programs and determines their effects. The counselor understands human behavior: a. Is informed in the area of human behavior. h. Observes children in varied settings. c. Ts aware of physical and developmental differences. d. Ts aware of hierarchical differences in children's needs. e. rits his understandings and his approaches together. f. Is aware of situational (home, school, neighborhood) effects on the child. The counselor respects others: a. Iloes not manipulate against others. h. Involves others in decisions relevant to them. c. Encourages the confrontation of issues hy those affected. d. racilitatcs genuineness in others. 4 The counselor in his own person: a. Demonstrates that he accepts and respects himself. h. Is aware of his own needs. c. Is engaged in coping with his own needs. \u0026lt;l. functions in ways which demonstrate openness, honesty, and genuineness. e. Is courageous. f. Is alert and well informed. g. Is sensitive to others, aware of both verbal and non-verbal components of behavior. h. Is a responsive human being. 1. Is a potent being. The counselor understands basic principals of education: a. Is an informed student of principles of education. b. Considers individual differences. c. Respects the values of helping relationships. d. Is aware of the values of openness and honesty. e. Understands developmental processes of early and middle childhood. f. Understands the elementary school as a social system. 5 ELEMENTARY GUIDANCE AND COUNSELING SERVICES l\u0026lt;J\\TTONJ\\LF I . The elementary school of today is no longer protected and isolated from society 's problems and concerns, rather, it has hecome a setting where the early symptoms of these problems are being displayed. 2. Elementary school children arc, therefore, increasingly vulnerable to these external pressures as they attempt to acquire personal and social skills in addition to academic competencies. :S. Early symptoms of these pressures are underachievement, school disinterest, classroom disruption, and truancy which result in acute societal and economic burdens. 4. Without early and appropriate intervention, these pressures arc manifested as juvenile delinquency, substance abuse, school vandalism, failure, and the loss to society of s. fully functioning and competent adult members. l11 no other setting is the establishment of a foundation for self-discipline and positive mental health more critical. It is here that school children absorb and adopt views related to human and societal values, attitudes toward self, work, antl toward individuals from other cultures and ethnic origins. 6. Positive learning environments for children require a comprehensive coordinated effort of the school, the home and the community. The elementary school counselor is a professional uniquely qualified to facilitate such cooperative efforts witl1in an established guidance and counseling program. ROLE The role of the guidance counselor is to assure the accessibility of developmental guidance and counseling to all children of elementary school age by establishing comprehensive guidance pro grams . Implementation of these programs is to be performed hy a ce rtified elementary school counselor. 1. Counseling in groups and individually, with all children to\n1ss1st them in school and life adjustment tasks\ne.g., helping them learn to make choices and to accept responsibility for choi ces made, learning to solve their own problems, developing positive attitudes, values, and work habits, acquiring basic un\u0026lt;lcrstandings of the world of work, increasing their human relations skills, and learning to make reasoned adjustments to the demands and responsibilities associated with family, school and community membership. 6 2. Consulting with teachers, parents, educational specialists, administrators, community members, and others to establish and maintain the best possible environment for learning and personal growth. 3. Coordinating school and community resources in behalf of all children, including those whose special needs require additional and unique services, such as handicapped, gifted and talented, learning disabled, limited English-speaking, economically disadvantaged, and culturally different. FUNCTION Counselor functions would also include, but not be limited to the following activities: 1. Recognizing early indications of social maladjustment, child abuse and neglect, and other physical and emotional problems requiring immediate intervention and appropriate referral services. 2. Providing information leading to the reduction of racial and ethnic prejudices, sex-role stereotyping, and an increased regard for the worth and dignity of all individuals. 3. Conducting classroom guidance sessions for children in areas of citizenship, interpersonal skills, improved study habits, meaningful use of leisure time, impact of one's behavior on others, self-management, effective use and the conservation of natural resources. 4. Providing teachers with assistance concerning an individual student. 5. Conducting teacher discussion groups on classroom management techniques, differing learning styles and developmental stages of children. 6. Providing information about the work, ethics, career awareness, and other factors affecting career development, such as the interactions of business, industry, government and labor in the larger society. 7. Conducting family discussion groups on parenting skills, home-school cooperation, and parent-teacher relationships. 8. Coordinating the guidance activities with administrators and other school specialists to assure optimal delivery of guidance services. 9. Coordinating liaison activities between the elementary and middle-school/junior high school settings that assure effective articulation of developmental guidance and counseling services. J 7 TIIE UNIQUE ROLE or TflE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL COUNSELOR APGA Position Paper Rationale Consistent with the philosophy of education, elementary school counseling concerns itself with children in the developmental process of maximizing their potential. The elementary counselor works within the educational framework and the child's total environment to enable each child to arrive at an identity and learn to make choices and decisions that lead to effective functioning as a worthwhile being. Particular attention and time need to be given in the educational program of young children to provide training and opportunities to learn decision-making skills. Individuals make the choices and decisions that ultimately determine their behavior and their learning. Elementary school counselors, be cause of their specialized training, provide service and leadership in this area as it is integrated into the total s ci1ool experience. Elementary guidance and counseling builds upon the belief that human beings must have continuous experience of challenge, achievement, and success. The school creates situations in which children find themselves needed and wanted by others. Teachers can demonstrate to pupils that they matter as individuals and are accepted as they are, by their teachers as well as by their peers. The teacher plays the primary role in working with children and the counselor aids the teacher in making education more meaningful to each child with the implementation of an appropriate guidance and counseling program. Oh_jectives As an elementary school guidance and counseling program is composed of more than a professional counselor, it is imperative that our objectives represent all of the various populations. We arc then able to communicate more clearly our responsibilities and goals and the manner in which they relate to the total education and environment of the child. I. For A. l3  C. ]). E. individual children (age-appropriate): To be able to identify themselves by description, likes, dislikes, interests, skills and similar concern. To be able to define their role in the family, school setting, neighborhood, and community. To have a positive feeling of self and be able to verbalize self-feelings in a straightforward, comfortable manner without fear of non-acceptance. To ?e abl~ to_recognize their own shortcomings and accept their l1m1tat1ons, then proceed to work toward improvement as goals are set. To he acceptant of other people and be able to identify and work toward solving conflicts in relationships. 8 F. To feel good about learning and working and, when distress occurs, be able to use appropriate skills of problem-solving and decision-making to reach a level at which they are able to cope. G. 10 ~ave interest in the future and engage in some fantasizing of possible life roles. I!. To have a realistic understanding of the interrelatedness of people and the world of work and services and the part that the child, other members of the family and acquaintances play in it. II. For teachers, administrators, and parents in the child's life: I L I . A. R. C. n. for A. B. C. ll. I:. To understand and accept the child's self-concept and work toward determining with them positive changes\nthen to provide guidance and support as each child endeavors to make those changes. To relate to the child as a worthwhile human being, so that the child can use acceptable and appropriate relationship behavior. To provide teaching, experiences, and opportunities for learning decision-making skills and grant the child the dignity to live with and learn from mistakes without criticism and ridicule, or without \"taking over\" the decision-making. To seek help for themselves when necessary in order to provide the most effective learning environment for the child. the counselor: To be a congruent human being comfortable in both personal and professional life to the extent that the counselor can functLon for the best intercc.t of those served. To accept each person (child and adult), in the professional environment, with all accompanying feelings and behaviors, and help the counselee with unique training and skills to define needs and concerns. To provide the guidance and counseling appropriate and acceptable for the counselee. To be able to identify changes and objectives reached hy counselee and interpret them to others. To serve as an advocate for the child within the adult structure of the school and community. 9 Submitted by: TI PPCCANOE SCHOOL CORPORATION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL COUNSELING PROGRAM Marjorie R. Sharples and Kathy Coder Elementary Counselors, Tippecanoe School Corporation September 1980 PHILOSOPHY The main goal of elementary guidance is to assist schools in personalizing and humanizing the educational process for all students. This can be accomplished by helping children better understand themselves and others, and by helping them recognize the opportunities, rcsponsihilities, and choices which education and life provide. fn addition, due to the pressures of an increasingly complex s ociety, children often encounter problems which may require appropriate supplementary adult support. Counselor assistance in early identification of difficulties and early intervention can aid children, parents, and teachers deal with and grow through these experiences. We believe in the importance of the following: - working with and being an advocate for all children, - functioning as team members with children, school personnel, and parents, - recognizing the potential for growth and change, - seeing the elementary school setting as a place where effective living skills can be learned, - valuing the importance of affective learning, and heing flexible enough to meet the needs of children in a particular school setting while utilizing the unique talents of a specific counselor. Tn conclusion, we believe it is important to help children develop\nin appreciation for life in general, and human life in particular, through accepting, understanding, and celebrating themselves and others. We want to help children grow in increa s ingly more satisfying relationships with the world. Elementary guidance is an integral part of the total educational experience. We cannot separate the academic growth from the social emotional growth of the child. The elementary counselor wi11 focus on the total growth potential of each child in the elementary school. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES We sec the elementary counselor's role as part of a team effort involving the student, school personnel, and parents in very interrelated ways. Students are our main concern. They can help themselves and each other in many ways. 10 Our goals with students are: to help children develop a self-awareness, to help children develop a positive self-concept, to help children develop a positive attitude toward school and learning (focus is on topics such as motivation to learn, responsibility for self and to others), to help children develop good relationships with peers, parents, teachers, and siblings, to help children improve their communication skills, to help children develop effective decision-making skills, to help children deal with personal concerns: developmental tasks, crises, school related problems, home concerns, health and physical development, to help children to develop an awareness of the world of work and preparation needed to participate in it, and to ease the transitions between school settings (i.e. mobile students, preschool/kindergarten and elementary/ junior high). Teachers and other school personnel have tremendous influence on the child's school environment. Our goals with school personnel are : to help teachers identify students with special needs and abilities, to help teachers with classroom management, to be aware of teachers' needs and provide support individually and collectively through inservice training groups, resource papers dealing with teacher concerns, guidance activity ideas, etc., to assist teachers with affective education and career education, to participate in curriculum development and evaluation when appropriate, to help teachers utilize school and community resources and support personnel (I.E. GLASS, Family Service Agency, Wabash Valley Mental Health Society, etc.). Parents are the third vital part of the guidance team. Our goals with parents are: to help parents understand child growth and development, to foster good home/school cooperation and understanding, to enhance parent/child communication and relationships, to familiarize parents with community resources, and to provide support. 11 _J . ADMINISTRATION OF GUIDANCE PROGRAM In order to function as a guidance team, some coordination an\u0026lt;l administration must take place. Therefore, the elementary counselors will: regularly develop, interpret, implement, and evaluate the guidance activities within TSC elementary schools, interpret the elementary guidance program to the community, initiate and assist in planning a total k-12 guidance program, be knowledgeable about and utilize community resources, plan and carry out an ongoing evaluation of the elementary guidance program using input from students, parents, teachers, and other school personnel, be aware of available guidance materials and be able to evaluate their quality and usefulness in our guidance program, and he accountable for the use of their time by keeping records of their activities and regulary sharing these records with administrators. COUNSELOR ACTIVITIES To accomplish these objectives, counselor methods and activities might include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: introductory contacts with all classrooms, individual and group counseling sessions with children, contacted through self referral, teacher, parent, or other referral sources, teacher and parent consultations, classroom observations, classroom guidance activities, career awareness activities with classes, curriculum development and evaluation when appropriate, organizing pupil information so it is more readily usah]c by teachers, parents, and students, (i.e. test results, psychological reports, etc.), teacher inscrvice activities, parent education groups, kindergarten and junior high orientation meetings, consultation with community resources, cooperation with nurses, speech therapists, psychometrists, an\u0026lt;l special teachers to provide coordinated evaluation and services, and serving as a child advocate on various committees within the school system. 12 A. Inservice day hefore the children come to school in the fall, give a presentation to all principals and teachers of all schools. 1. Include a rationale - \"ChanBing Times and the Needs of Society Today.\" 2. Explain the Role - film, \"Developmental Counseling in the Elementary School.\" 3. Recruit an \"expert\" from somewhere else to assist you with this program. (e.g., State Department consultant or a principal from a nearby city who has a counseling program.) B. Initial meeting with principal in your building. l. Talk about your role. 2. Discuss how you would like to explain your role to the staff of the building. 3. Arrange a time to speak at an upcoming staff meeting. 4. Invite him/her to watch the introduction lessons you will be doing with kids. S. Listen carefully to his/her expectations of the role of the counselor. 6. Learn all you can about the special needs and character of your school. C:. l. xplaining your role to teachers. I. Short letter or introduction. 2. Go around the building and visit each teacher 1n his/her classroom. a. Explain role b. Ask for referrals C . Request a time to visit your role to children. with the children will to tc\n-ichcrs.) ~- c\nRJ , Folders. t::::__-, 14 the class to explain (Your activities explain your role t'r\\G...k:'e o.. ~older- -+or eo..c.h ~!c,_c.V\\tr 4. ~ couple of months after starting the program, arrange a time to discuss the program with your teachers. Possibly have the principal lead the discussion. Include the following questions: a. So far, what are some things you like about the guidance program? b. Do you see any potential problems or have any concerns about the program? Is there anything you feel uneasy about or uncertain or need more information? c. What is something you can \u0026lt;lo to help the guidance program grow? 15 \"Si~i\"\\,+1ca.\"-\"t- rc\\~+-ior-csh.,ps.  ~+ct..l\"'+ w ~ i-h. C, t\\ e. ~: tt-\\ e. \\A,JOY\"c:l - H\n\\ 1, l'm very pleased to be a part of this school and am looking forward to meeting each of you! To help you understand my role as your guidance counselor, I've jotted down some ideas about my position. Elementary counseling is classifed by H.E_.W, as a service program and must serve only those children who have been identified through a Title I instructional programs as Title I students. I wi 11 need your help in identifying the Title I children in your room. The next few weeks I'll be asking about a convenient time to come into your class to explain to your children my role as a counselor. I've included a folder with this information as a convenient place to keep your guidance materials. Every now and then you will be receiving information, ideas, and notes from me which I hope will be helpful and useful. /\\gain, yourself to I am excited to be here and hope you will introduce me.f ~ ~~ _ ~~ ~ FACTS ABOUT MY ROLE AS YOUR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GUIDANCE COUNSELOR: Who- I am an adult friend to children and a resource person for you. llow-r sec children individually, in small groups, and \u0026lt;luring classroom presentations f see children mostly on the basis of self-referral and if you suggest I talk with someone. When- I '11 be at your school 2 \u0026lt;lays a week. Why- I strongly believe ~hildren hcncfit from h:iving an adult friend just to talk with, an\u0026lt;l 1 LIKE children. What- The things I talk about with children include: Self-concept Self-awareness Career awareness Study habits Peer relationships Feelings Concerns from home Attitudes Etc. Where- 16 My room is across the hall near the principal's office. Stop by. SECTION I I I Just for Kids: This i tern in the \"Care Package\" is labeled - \"Just for Kids.\" They arc the reason that all the previous activities have been Jone. All those activities have been setting the stage for the counselor to he able to begin to develop relationships with children in the school. The following lessons are suggestions of ways to introduce the role of the counselor to children. A. K-2 Puppet Talk B. Frog Puppet Show C . Co un s e l or ' s Bag 0 . ? - Role of the Counselor E. Self-Referral Poster F. Coloring Book 17 The second visit to the classrooms should be some kind of a presentation on how to have a classroom discussion. This will give the children an idea of what you expect from them. It will also be modeling for teachers a classroom management technique. rhcse ideas need to be reinforced every time you do a classroom guidance activity for the first few months. /\\. DUSO characters: 1. Don't clam up. 2. Stick to the point. 3. Raise your hand. 4. Listen carefully. 5. Work together. IL Clues to a good classroom discussion (Dr. Linda Myrick) 1. A hand - raise your hand. 2. A mouth - share your ideas. 3. An ear - listen to others. 4. A mouse sitting on a chair - sit as quiet as a mouse. What is this a picture of? How will this help in a discussion? C. Magic Circle rules 18 Introducing the Counselor Grade level: K-2 Materials: an an\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_79","title":"Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2010-09"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.). Office of Desegregation Monitoring","School integration","Arkansas. Department of Education","Project managers--Implements"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/79"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["project management"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nARKANSAS DEPARTJ\\t\\ENT OF EDUCATIO Dr. Tom w. Kimbrell September 30. 20 I 0 Commissioner State Board of Education Dr. Naccaman Williams Springdale Chair Jim Cooper Melboume Vice Chair Sherry Burrow Jonesboro Brenda Gullett Fayetteville Sam Ledbetter Little Rock Alice Mahony El Dorado Dr. Ben Mays Clinton Toyce Newton Crossett Vicki Saviers Little Rock Four Capitol Mall Little Rock, AR 72201-1019 (501) 682-4475 - ArkansasEd.org An Equal Opportunity Employer Mr. Chri tophcr Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark -IOO West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 '.'vlr. John'-.\\'. \\,\\ 'alker John Walker, P. :.\\. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Office of Desegregation \\lonitoring One t nion National Plaza 12-t West Capitol. Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Stephen \\\\ '. Jones Jack. Lyon \u0026amp; Jones -l25 West Capitol. Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 7220 I Mr. !'vi. Samuel Jones 1II Mitchell, Williams, Selig. Gates \u0026amp; V-. oodyard -l25 West Capitol ,\\venue. Suite 1800 Little Rock, AR 7220 I RE: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. C.:.S. Di!\ntrict Court .Vo. 4:82-CV-866 WR W Dear Gentlemen: By way of this letter, I am advising you that I am l'iling the Arkansas Department of Education's Project Management Tool for the month of September 20 IO in the abo\\.erefcrenced case. [f you have any questions. please feel free to contact me at your conwnience. Sincerely, ~C-(X~ Jeremy C. Lasiter General Counsel RECEIVED OCT 1 2 2010 CfFICE OF DESEGREGil.T\\Ori MONITORING UNITED STATES DfSTRICT COURT EASTER.' DISTRICT OF ARKr\\\\'SAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCl!OOL DISTRICT PLAlNTIFF V. No. LR-C-82-866 WR W PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1. et al DEFE~DA1' TS OTICE or FILING In accordance with the Court's Order of December l 0. 1993, the Arkansas Depanmem of Education hereby gi\\es notice of the filing of the ADEs Project Management Tool for September, 20 l 0. C . ~ J:::\u0026gt; 8 y: o-.---...... Jey(. Lasiter, General Counsel Ark. Bar I o. 2001-2005 Ark. Department of Education CERT[FICATE OF SERV[CE [, Jeremy Lasiter, certify that on September 30,2010. [ caused the foregoing document to be erved b1 depositing a copy in the United States mail. postage prepaid, addressed to each of the following: \\Ir. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark -+00 West Capitol. Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 7220 I -3-t93 Mr. John W. Walker John v\\'alker. P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Vlr. :v1ark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes Wagoner, [\\ers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Office of Desegregation i\\[onitoring One Gnion National PlaLa 12-+ \\\\'est Capitol. Suite 1895 Little Roel\u0026lt;. AR 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack. Lyon \u0026amp; Jones -+25 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, :\\R 7220 I i\\lr. :vi. Samuel Jones, [II Mitchell. Williams. Selig. Gates \u0026amp; Woodyard -+25 \\,Vest Capitol. Suite 1800 Little Rock. :\\R 7220 I IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 Based on the information available at August 31, 2010, the ADE calculated the State Foundation Funding for FY 10/11 subject to periodic adjustments. 8. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 1 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 201 O Based on the information available at August 31, 2010, the ADE calculated for, FY10/11 , subject to periodic adjustments. C. Process and distribute State MFPA. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 On August 31, 2010, distributions of State Foundation Funding for FY 10/11 were as follows: LRSD - $5,312,841 NLRSD - $3,253,181 PCSSD - $4,028,487 The allotments of State Foundation Funding calculated for FY 10/11 at August 31 , 2010, subject to periodic adjustments, were as follows: LRSD - $58,441,252 NLRSD - $35,784,992 PCSSD - $44,313,364 D. Determine the number of Magnet students residing in each District and attending a Magnet School. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at August 31, 2010 for FY10/11, subject to periodic adjustments. E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as ordered by the Court. 2 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at August 31, 2010 for FY10/11, subject to periodic adjustments. It should be noted that currently the Magnet Review Committee is reporting this information instead of the staff attorney as indicated in the Implementation Plan. F. Calculate state aid due the LRSD based upon the Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 On September 10, 2009, changes were made in the expense per child to $8,212 per court order. The final Magnet payment for FY 08/09 was $511 ,455. Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at August 31, 201 O for FY10/11, subject to periodic adjustments. G. Process and distribute state aid for Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 Distributions for FY 10/11 at August 31 , 2010, totaled $1 ,389,721. Allotment calculated for FY 10/11 was $13,897,197 subject to periodic adjustments. H. Calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school district is entitled. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at June 30, 2010 for FY 09/10, subject to periodic adjustments. 3 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) I. J. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, September - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 Distributions for FY 09/10 at June 30, 2010, were: LRSD - $4,905, 188 NLRSD - $5,958,194 PCSSD - $10,478,331 The allotments calculated for FY 09/10 at June 30, 2010, subject to periodic adjustments, were: LRSD - $4,905,188 NLRSD - $5,887,319 PCSSD - $10,478,331 The North Little Rock School District was overpaid for M-to-M in the amount of $159,655. They repaid $88,780 in June of 2010. Districts submit an estimated Magnet and M-to-M transportation budget to ADE. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, December of each year. 2. Actual as of September 30, 201 O In September 2007, the Magnet and M-to-M transportation budgets for FY 07/08 were submitted to the ADE by the Districts. K. The Coordinator of School Transportation notifies General Finance to pay districts for the Districts' proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 In August 2009, General Finance was notified to pay the third one-third payment for FY 08/09 to the Districts. In August 2009, General Finance was notified to pay the first one-third payment for FY 09/10 to the Districts. In January 2010, General Finance was notified to pay the second one-third payment for FY 09/10 to the Districts. 4 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) L.  ADE pays districts three equal installments of their proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 In January 2010, General Finance made the second one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 09/10 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equaf installments. At January 31 , 2010, the following had been paid for FY 09/10: LRSD - $2,778,700 NLRSD - $887,615.26 PCSSD - $2,229,905.22 In September 2010, General Finance made the last one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 09/10 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 30, 2009, the following had been paid for FY 09/10: LRSD - $4,054,730.00 NLRSD - $1,471,255.67 PCSSD - $2,544,356.20 In September 2010, General Finance made the first one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 10/11 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 30, 2010, the following had been paid for FY 09/1 O: LRSD - $1 ,354,368.33 NLRSD - $510,218.13 PCSSD - $905,109.15 M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 5 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) In August 1997, the ADE transportation coordinator reviewed each district's Magnet and M-to-M transportation costs for FY 96/97. In July 1998, each district was asked to submit an estimated budget for the 98/99 school year. In September 1998, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 98/99 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. School districts should receive payment by October 1, 1998 In September 1999, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 99/00 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2000, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 00/01 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2001, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 01 /02 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2002, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 02/03 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2003, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 03/04 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2004, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 04/05 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In October 2005, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 05/06 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2006, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 06/07 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2007, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 07/08 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2008, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 08/09 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2009, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 09/10 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2010, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 10/11 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. 6 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as stated in Exhibit A of the Implementation Plan. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) In FY 94/95, the State purchased 52 buses at a cost of $1 ,799,431 which were added to or replaced existing Magnet and M-to-M buses in the Districts. The buses were distributed to the Districts as follows: LRSD - 32\nNLRSD - 6\nand PCSSD - 14. The ADE purchased 64 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $2,334,800 in FY 95/96. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 45\nNLRSD - 7\nand PCSSD - 12. In May 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $646,400. In July 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $624,879. In July 1998, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $695,235. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD- 6. Specifications for 16 school buses have been forwarded to state purchasing for bidding in January, 1999 for delivery in July, 1999. In July 1999, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $718,355. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD- 6. In July 2000, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $724, 165. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD- 6. The bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was let by State Purchasing on February 22, 2001 . The contract was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include two 47 passenger buses for $43,426.00 each and fourteen 65 passenger buses for $44,289.00 each. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 2 of the 47 passenger and 4 of the 65 passenger buses. On August 2, 2001, the ADE took possession of 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $706,898. 7 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) In June 2002, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include five 47 passenger buses for $42,155.00 each, ten 65 passenger buses for $43,850.00 each, and one 47 passenger bus with a wheelchair lift for $46,952.00. The total amount was $696,227. In August of 2002, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $696,227. In June 2003, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include 5 - 47 passenger buses for $47,052.00 each, and 11 - 65 passenger buses for $48,895.00 each. The total amount was $773,105. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 5 of the 47 passenger and 1 of the 65 passenger buses. In June 2004, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The price for the buses was $49,380 each for a total cost of $790,080. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8, NLRSD - 2, and PCSSD - 6. In June 2005, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses for the LRSD include 8 - 65 passenger buses for $53,150.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 1 - 47 passenger bus for $52,135.00, and 1 - 65 passenger bus for $53,150.00. The buses for the PCSSD include 6 - 65 passenger buses for $53,150.00 each. The total amount was $849,385.00. In March 2006, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Central States Bus Sales. The buses for the LRSD include 8 - 65 passenger buses for $56,810.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 1 - 47 passenger bus for $54,990.00, and 1 - 65 passenger bus for $56,810.00. The buses for the PCSSD include 6 - 65 passenger buses for $56,810.00 each. The total amount was $907,140.00. In March 2007, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Central States Bus Sales. The buses for the LRSD include 4 - 47 passenger buses for $63,465.00 each, and 4 - 65 passenger buses for $66,390.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 2 - 47 passenger buses for $63,465.00 each. The buses for the PCSSD include 1 - 65 passenger bus with a lift for $72,440.00 and 5 - 47 passenger buses for $63,465.00 each. The total amount was $1 ,036,115.00. 8 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) In July 2007, 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses were delivered to the districts in Pulaski County. Finance paid Central States Bus Sales $1 ,036,115. In March 2008, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Central States Bus Sales. The buses for the LRSD include 8 - 65 passenger buses for $66,405.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 1 - 65 passenger bus with a wheelchair lift for $72,850.00 and 1 - 47 passenger bus with a wheelchair. lift for $70,620.00. The buses for the PCSSD include 2 - 65 passenger buses for $66,405.00 each, 2 - 47 passenger buses for $65,470.00 each and 2 - 47 passenger buses with wheelchair lifts for $70,620.00 each. The total amount was $1 ,079,700.00. In July 2008, 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses were delivered to the districts in Pulaski County. Finance paid Central States Bus Sales $1 ,079,700. In March 2009, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Central States Bus Sales. The buses for the LRSD include 8 - 65 passenger buses for $65,599.00 each. The buses for the NLRSD include 2 - 65 passenger buses for $65,599.00 each. The buses for the PCSSD include 6 - 65 passenger buses for $65,599.00 each. The total amount was $1 ,049,584.00. In July 2008, 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses were delivered to the districts in Pulaski County. Finance paid Central States Bus Sales $1 ,079,700. In August 2009, 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses were delivered to the districts in Pulaski County. Finance paid Central States Bus Sales $1,049,584. Bids were opened on May 7, 2010 for sixteen Magnet and M-to-M buses. The low bid was by Diamond State Bus Sales for a total of $1 ,135,960. There are fourteen 65 passenger buses at $71 ,210 per unit and two 47 passenger units at $69,510 per unit. Little Rock will get 8 - 65 passenger buses. Pulaski County Special will get 4 - 65 passenger buses and 2 - 47 passenger buses. North Little Rock will get 2 - 65 passenger buses. In September 2010, 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses were delivered to the districts in Pulaski County. Finance paid Central States Bus Sales $1,135,960. 0 . Process and distribute compensatory education payments to LRSD as required by page 23 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 and January 1, of each school year through January 1, 1999. 9 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) 0. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to LRSD as required by page 23 of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 Obligation fulfilled in FY 96/97. P. Process and distribute additional payments in lieu of formula to LRSD as required by page 24 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. Q. Process and distribute payments to PCSSD as required by Page 28 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1994. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 Final payment was distributed July 1994. R. Upon loan request by LRSD accompanied by a promissory note, the ADE makes loans to LRSD. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing through July 1, 1999. See Settlement Agreement page 24. 2. Actual as of September 30, 201 O The LRSD received $3,000,000 on September 10, 1998. As of this reporting date, the LRSD has received $20,000,000 in loan proceeds. S. Process and distribute payments in lieu of formula to PCSSD required by page 29 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date 2. Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. Actual as of September 30, 201 O Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. 10 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) T. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to NLRSD as required by page 31 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 of each school. year through June 30, 1996. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. U. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 00/01 . Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 04/05. Distribution in July 2005 for FY 05/06 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 05/06. Distribution in July 2006 for FY 06/07 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 06/07. Distribution in July 2007 for FY 07/08 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 07/08. 11 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) U. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) Distribution in July 2008 for FY 08/09 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 08/09. Distribution in July 2009 for FY 09/10 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 09/10. Distribution in July 2010 for FY 10/11 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 10/11 . V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. 1. Projected Ending Date Not applicable. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 00/01 . Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 04/05. Distribution in July 2005 for FY 05/06 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 05/06. Distribution in July 2006 for FY 06/07 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 06/07. 12 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) Distribution in July 2007 for FY 07/08 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to ODM for FY 07/08. Distribution in July 2008 for FY 08/09 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 08/09. Distribution in July 2009 for FY 09/10 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 09/10. Distribution in July 2010 for FY 10/11 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 10/11 . 13 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. 1. Projected Ending Date January 15, 1995 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 In May 1995, monitors completed the unannounced visits of schools in Pulaski County. The monitoring process involved a qualitative process of document reviews, interviews, and observations. The monitoring focused on progress . made since the announced monitoring visits. In June 1995, monitoring data from unannounced visits was included in the July Semiannual Report. Twenty-five per cent of all classrooms were visited, and all of the schools in Pulaski County were monitored. All principals were interviewed to determine any additional progress since the announced visits. The July 1995 Monitoring Report was reviewed by the ADE administrative team, the Arkansas State Board of Education and the Districts. Then it was filed with the Court. The report was formatted in accordance with the Allen Letter. In October 1995, a common terminology was developed by principals from the Districts and the Lead Planning and Desegregation staff to facilitate the monitoring process. The announced monitoring visits began on November 14, 1995 and were completed on January 26, 1996. Copies of the preliminary Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the ADE administrative team and the State Board of Education in January 1996. A report on the current status of the Cycle 5 schools in the ECOE process and their school improvement plans was filed with the Court on February 1, 1996. The unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1996 and ended on May 10, 1996. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and the data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Districts provided data on enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Districts and the ADE Desegregation Monitoring staff developed a definition for instructional programs. 14 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996 with copies distributed to the parties. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996 and concluded in December 1996. In January 1997, presentations were made to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties to review the draft Semiannual Monitoring Report. The monitoring instrument and process were evaluated for their usefulness in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on achievement disparities. In February 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was filed. Unannounced monitoring visits began on February 3, 1997 and concluded in May 1997. In March 1997, letters were sent to the Districts regarding data requirements for the July 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and the additional discipline data element that was requested by the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Desegregation data collection workshops were conducted in the Districts from March 28, 1997 to April 7, 1997. A meeting was conducted on April 3, 1997 to finalize plans for the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report. Onsite visits were made to Cycle 1 schools who did not submit accurate and timely data on discipline, M-to-M transfers, and policy. The July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were finalized in June 1997. In July 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were filed with the court, and the ADE sponsored a School Improvement Conference. On July 10, 1997, copies of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were made available to the Districts for their review prior to filing it with the Court. In August 1997, procedures and schedules were organized for the monitoring of the Cycle 2 schools in FY 97/98. 15 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) A Desegregation Monitoring and School Improvement Workshop for the Districts was held on September 10, 1997 to discuss monitoring expectations, instruments, data collection and school improvement visits. On October 9, 1997, a planning meeting was held with the desegregation monitoring staff to discuss deadlines, responsibilities, and strategic planning issues regarding the Semiannual Monitoring Report. Reminder letters were sent to the Cycle 2 principals outlining the data collection deadlines and availability of technical assistance. In October and November 1997, technical assistance visits were conducted, and announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 2 schools were completed. In December 1997 and January 1998, technical assistance visits were conducted regarding team visits, technical review recommendations, and consensus building. Copies of the infusion document and perceptual surveys were provided to schools in the ECOE process. The February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report was submitted for review and approval to the State Board of Education, the Director, the Administrative Team, the Attorney General's Office, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process, external team visits and finalizing school improvement plans. On February 18, 1998, the representatives of all parties met to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. Additional meetings will be scheduled. Unannounced monitoring visits were conducted in March 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process and external team visits. In April 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were conducted, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. 16 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) In May 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. On May 18, 1998, the Court granted the ADE relief from its obligation to file the July 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report to develop proposed modifications to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. In June 1998, monitoring information previously submitted by the districts in the Spring of 1998 was reviewed and prepared for historical files and presentation to the Arkansas State Board. Also, in June the following occurred: a) The Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed, b) the Semiannual Monitoring COE Data Report was completed, c) progress reports were submitted from previous cycles, and d.) staff development on assessment (SAT-9) and curriculum alignment was conducted with three supervisors. In July, the Lead Planner provided the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee with (1) a review of the court Order relieving ADE of its obligation to file a July Semiannual Monitoring Report, and (2) an update of ADE's progress toward work with the parties and ODM to develop proposed revisions to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. The Committee encouraged ODM, the parties and the ADE to continue to work toward revision of the monitoring and reporting process. In August 1998, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Attorney General, the Assistant Director for Accountability and the Education Lead Planner updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and proposed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. In September 1998, tentative monitoring dates were established and they will be finalized once proposed revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring Plan are finalized and approved. In September/October 1998, progress was being made on the proposed revisions to the monitoring process by committee representatives of all the Parties in the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement. While the revised monitoring plan is finalized and approved, the ADE monitoring staff will continue to provide technical assistance to schools upon request. 17 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) In December 1998, requests were received from schools in PCSSD regarding test score analysis and staff Development. Oak Grove is scheduled for January 21 , 1999 and Lawson Elementary is also tentatively scheduled in January. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD has been rescheduled for April 2000. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD was conducted on May 5, 2000 and May 9, 2000 respectively. Staff development regarding classroom management was provided to the Franklin Elementary School in LRSD on November 8, 2000. Staff development . regarding ways to improve academic achievement was presented to College Station Elementary in PCSSD on November 22, 2000. On November 1, 2000, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Director for Accountability updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and discussed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for February 27, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group meeting that was scheduled for February 27 had to be postponed. It will be rescheduled as soon as possible. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting is scheduled for June 27, 2001 . The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from June 27. It will take place on July 26, 2001 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 18 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) On July 26, 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 11, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. On October 11 , 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the ADE's intent to take a proactive role in Desegregation Monitoring. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 10, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting that was scheduled for January 10 was postponed. It has been rescheduled for February 14, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On February 12, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 11 , 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On April 11, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 11 , 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. 19 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) On July 18, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, talked about section XV in the Project Management Tool (PMT) on Standardized Test Selection to Determine Loan Forgiveness. She said that the goal has been completed, and no additional reporting is required for section XV. Mr. Morris discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. He handed out a Court Order from May 9, 2002, which contained comments from U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr., about hearings on the LRSD request for unitary status. Mr. Morris also handed out a document from the Secretary of Education about the No Child Left Behind Act. There was discussion about how this could have an affect on Desegregation issues. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 10, 2002 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from October 10. It will take place on October 29, 2002 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. On October 29, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Meetings with the parties to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan will be postponed by request of the school districts in Pulaski County. Additional meetings could be scheduled after the Desegregation ruling is finalized. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 9, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On January 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. No Child Left Behind and the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD were discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from April 10. It will take place on April 24, 2003 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 20 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) On April 24, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Laws passed by the legislature need to be checked to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Ray Lumpkin was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he left, we will discuss the legislation with Clearence Lovell. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 10, 2003 at 1:30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On August 28, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The LRSD has been instructed to submit evidence showing progress in reducing disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. This is supposed to be done by March of 2004, so that the LRSD can achieve unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 9, 2003 at the ADE. On October 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 8, 2004 at the ADE. On October 16, 2003, ADE staff met with the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee at the State Capitol. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, and Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, presented the Chronology of activity by the ADE in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan for the Desegregation Settlement Agreement. They also discussed the role of the ADE Desegregation Monitoring Section. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, reported on legal issues relating to the Pulaski County Desegregation Case. Ann Marshall shared a history of activities by ODM, and their view of the activity of the school districts in Pulaski County. John Kunkel discussed Desegregation funding by the ADE. 21 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) On November 4, 2004, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The ADE is required to check laws that the legislature passes to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Clearence Lovell was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he has retired, the ADE attorney will find out who will be checking the next legislation. The  Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 6, 2005 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On May 3, 2005, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Gtoup met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The PCSSD has petitioned to be released from some desegregation monitoring. There was discussion in the last legislative session that suggested all three districts in Pulaski County should seek unitary status. Legislators also discussed the possibility of having two school districts in Pulaski County instead of three. An Act was passed by the Legislature to conduct a feasibility study of having only a north school district and a south school district in Pulaski County. Removing Jacksonville from the PCSSD is also being studied. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 7, 2005 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On June 20, 2006, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. ADE staff from the Office of Public School Academic Accountability updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The purpose, content, and due date for information going into the Project Management Tool and its Executive Summary were reported. There was discussion about the three districts in Pulaski County seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 17, 2006 at 1:30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 22 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) On March 16, 2007, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review previous Implementation Phase activities. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, reported that U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr. declared the LRSD unitary and released the district from federal court superv1s1on. It was stated that the ADE should continue desegregation reporting until the deadline for an appeal filing has past, or until an appeal has been denied. House Bill 1829 passed the House and Senate. This says the ADE should hire consultants to determine whether and in what respects any of the Pulaski County districts are unitary. It authorizes the ADE and the Attorney General to seek proper federal court review and determination of the current unitary status and allows the State of Arkansas to continue payments under a post-unitary agreement to the three Pulaski County districts for a time period not to exceed seven years. The three Pulaski County districts may be reimbursed for legal fees incurred for seeking unitary or partial unitary status if their motions seeking unitary status or partial unitary status are filed no later than October 30, 2007, and the school districts are declared unitary or at least partially unitary by the federal district court no later than June 14, 2008. Matt McCoy and Scott Richardson from the Attorney General's Office updated the group on legal issues related to desegregation. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 5, 2007 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On July 12, 2007, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. He handed out the syllabus of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling from June 28, 2007 about the Seattle School District. The court ruled that the district could no longer use race as the only criteria for making certain elementary school assignments and to rule on transfer requests. Mr. Scott Richardson from the Attorney General's Office said that an expert was going to study the Pulaski County school districts and see what they need to do to become unitary. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 4, 2007 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 23 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) On October 11 , 2007, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. He handed out news articles about the LRSD bein~ declared unitary and the Joshua interveners filing a notice of appeal to the 81 Circuit Court. The LRSD and the Joshua interveners have asked that the appeal be put on hold while they pursue a mediated settlement. Mr. Scott Richardson from the Attorney General's Office said that the LRSD had until October 31 to respond to the appeal filed by the Joshua interveners. He said that the NLRSD was trying to get total unitary status and the PCSSD was working on getting unitary status in their student assignment. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 10, 2008 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On January 10, 2008, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. He handed out news articles about the districts in Pulaski County seeking unitary status. The Joshua lnterveners filed a motion with the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn the ruling that gave the Little Rock School District unitary status. The Little Rock School District filed its response to the motion by the Joshua lnterveners. After the Pulaski County Special School District sought unitary status, the Joshua lnterveners requested that school desegregation monitors do a study on the quality of facilities in the district, or on the district's compliance with its desegregation plan. Judge Wilson denied the requests by Joshua lnterveners. The North Little Rock School District asked for unitary status and Joshua lnterveners objected and asked for a hearing. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 10, 2008 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 24 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) On April 10, 2008, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. House Bill 1829 that passed in 2007 allowed Pulaski County districts to be reimbursed for legal fees incurred for seeking unitary or partial unitary status if they are declared unitary or at least partially unitary by the federal district court no later than June 14 of 2008. Act 2 was passed in the special legislative session that started March 31 , 2008. This extends the deadline for unitary status to be reimbursed for legal fees from June 14 to December 31 . Also discussed in the Implementation Phase meeting was the push by Jacksonville residents to establish a Jacksonville School District. On April 15, 2008, the PCSSD School Board voted 4-2 against letting Jacksonville leave the district. In 2003, U. S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr., stopped an election in Jacksonville on forming an independent district. He said that taking Jacksonville out of the PCSSD would hinder efforts to comply with the court approved desegregation plan. A request by the PCSSD for unitary status is pending in federal district court. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 10, 2008 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On July 10, 2008, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. He handed out a news article that talked about an evaluation of the North Little Rock School District's compliance with its desegregation plan. The evaluation was done by the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM), a federal desegregation monitoring office. ODM said \"NLRSD has almost no compliance issues that would hinder its bid for unitary status\". Another article said that ODM has proposed a 2008-09 budget that would allow for closing at the end of December 2008 if the school districts in Pulaski County are declared unitary before then. Each of the districts has petitioned U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr. for unitary status. Another article was handed out stating that legislators, attorneys from the Attorney General's Office and representatives of the three school districts in Pulaski County have been conducting meetings to discuss ways to phase out desegregation payments. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 9, 2008 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 25 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) On October 9, 2008, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Meetings have been taking place to prepare for the possibility that the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upholds the ruling that gave the Little Rock School District unitary status. The LRSD has requested that for the next seven years, the three school districts in Pulaski County continue to receive the same amount of desegregation funding that they will receive this year. The LRSD also asked for restrictions on new charter schools in Pulaski County, protection from sanctions if they are in fiscal or academic distress, and a new state-funded education service cooperative in Pulaski County. In a September 17 update on the status of the PCSSD implementation of its desegregation plan, the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM) stated that in some PCSSD schools, black males have suspension rates above 50%. ODM stated that \"districtwide, discipline rates continue to climb\" and black males \"have discipline rates far out of proportion to their presence in the student body.\" Issues listed in the ODM report lead them to \"suggest that PCSSD is not presently in the posture to either seek or be awarded unitary status by the district court.\" The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 8, 2009 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 26 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) On January 8, 2009, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Recent news articles about the desegregation case were discussed. Mr. Scott Richardson, Arkansas Assistant Attorney General, received a letter in January from the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, stating that the appeal of the unitary status ruling was \"under active consideration\". Mr. Richardson had sent a letter to the clerk of the Court of Appeals in December asking him to inform the judges of legislative, legal and financial matters that hinge on the panel's decision. The panel had heard oral arguments about the appeal in March of 2008. In another news article, the Attorney General's Office rejected proposals to cap the number of new charter schools in Pulaski County, waive penalties for fiscal, academic or facilities distress, and establish a new state-funded education service cooperative in Pulaski County. The Attorney General's Office also rejected the request that for the next seven years, the three school districts in Pulaski County continue to receive the same amount of desegregation funding that they will receive this year. Instead, the office suggested reimbursement based on declining percentage rates, such as 77 percent of desegregation funding the second year, 54 percent the third year, and similar reductions the following years. Other topics of discussion in the meeting included the school choice law and the charter school law. The LRSD has said that charter schools interfere with efforts to comply with desegregation obligations. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 9, 2009 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On April 23, 2009, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The ruling from the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, stating that the Little Rock School District had achieved unitary status was discussed. U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr. withdrew from the desegregation lawsuit, and was replaced by U.S. District Judge Brian Miller. The first hearing on the Pulaski County school desegregation lawsuit with Judge Miller was scheduled for April 13, 2009. This hearing was cancelled because Judge Miller was involved in a car accident that morning. The hearing was going to be about how far the North Little Rock and Pulaski County Special school districts have progressed toward unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 9, 2009 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 2 7 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) On July 9, 2009, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Recent news articles about the desegregation case were discussed. One article stated that on May 19, Arkansas Attorney General Dustin McDaniel and Arkansas Assistant Attorney General Scott Richardson filed a motion asking U.S. District Judge Brian Miller to schedule court hearings on the requests for unitary status by the North Little Rock and Pulaski County Special school districts. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 8, 2009 at 1:30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On October 22, 2009, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Recent news articles about the desegregation case were discussed. One article states that Arkansas Attorney General Dustin McDaniel has proposed a seven year phase out of state desegregation payments. Another article talked about the first court hearing with U.S. District Judge Brian Miller on the requests for unitary status by the North Little Rock and Pulaski County Special school districts. The hearing was held on September 30. Sam Jones, an attorney for the Pulaski Special School District, Stephen Jones, an attorney for the North Little Rock School District, and Chris Heller, an attorney for the Little Rock School District, want the state desegregation payments to the three districts to continue even if the districts are all unitary. John Walker, an attorney for the Joshua lntervenors, told the judge that an expert should testify on educational achievement in the North Little Rock and Pulaski Special School Districts. He thought the judge was \"influenced\" by the reports he had received from the state. Judge Miller set January 11 as a unitary status hearing date for the North Little Rock School District, and January 25 as a unitary status hearing date for the Pulaski County Special School District. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 7, 2009 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. 28 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) On January 7, 2010, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Recent news articles about the desegregation case were discussed. One article talked about declining enrollments in the Little Rock School District and the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD). The PCSSD lost 275 students this year. Since state funding is based on average enrollment, the reduction in students could cost the PCSSD $1.6 million if the number of students stays the same the rest of the year. Enrollment in public charter schools in Pulaski County is up this year by 718 students. Also discussed was the news that U.S. District Judge Brian Miller postponed the unitary status hearing date for the North Little Rock School District from January 11 to January 25. He postponed the unitary status hearing date for the PCSSD from January 25 to February 22. The Joshua lntervenors had requested delays in the hearings. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 4, 2010 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On April 8, 2010, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Louis Ferren, ADE Internal Auditor for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Jeremy Lasiter, ADE General Council for Legal Services, talked about the desegregation unitary status hearings for the North Little Rock School District and the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD). He also talked about a draft of a federal court motion that could be presented by the Little Rock School District that would accuse the state of violating the desegregation agreement by approving charter schools in Pulaski County. Recent news articles about the desegregation case were discussed. Some articles talked about the PCSSD unitary status hearings discussing the condition of school facilities in the district. Mr. Doug Eaton, Director of Arkansas Public School Academic Facilities and Transportation, talked about school facilities in the PCSSD. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 8, 2010 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On July 8, 2010, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Ms. Melissa Jacks, Interim Program Manager for Licensure provided update information about NLRSD regarding the possible closure of elementary schools in response to declining enrollment within the district. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Commissioner for Accountability, talked about the need for districts to be .sure their buildings are ready to open in August. Mark White, ADE Council for Legal Services, said charter school applications will appear in the next State Board meeting agenda. 29 Ill. A PETITION FOR ELECTION FOR LRSD WILL BE SUPPORTED SHOULD A MILLAGE BE REQUIRED A. Monitor court pleadings to determine if LRSD has petitioned the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 Ongoing. All Court pleadings are monitored monthly. 8. Draft and file appropriate pleadings if LRSD petitions the Court for a special election. 1.  Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 To date, no action has been taken by the LRSD. 30 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION A. Using a collaborative approach, immediately identify those laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date December, 1994 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. B. Conduct a review within ADE of existing legislation and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. C. Request of the other parties to the Settlement Agreement that they identify laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. D. Submit proposals to the State Board of Education for repeal of those regulations that are confirmed to be impediments to desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. 31 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 A committee within the ADE was formed in May 1995 to review and collect data on existing legislation and regulations identified by the parties as impediments to desegregation. The committee researched the Districts' concerns to determine if any of the rules, regulations, or legislation cited impedes desegregation. The legislation cited by the Districts regarding loss funding and worker's compensation were not reviewed because they had already been litigated. In September 1995, the committee reviewed the following statutes, acts, and regulations: Act 113 of 1993\nADE Director's Communication 93-205\nAct 145 of 1989\nADE Director's Memo 91-67\nADE Program Standards Eligibility Criteria for Special Education\nArkansas Codes 6-18-206, 6-20-307, 6-20-319, and 6-17-1506. In October 1995, the individual reports prepared by committee members in their areas of expertise and the data used to support their conclusions were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. A report was prepared and submitted to the State Board of Education in July 1996. The report concluded that none of the items reviewed impeded desegregation. As of February 3, 1997, no laws or regulations have been determined to impede desegregation efforts. Any new education laws enacted during the Arkansas 81st Legislative Session will be reviewed at the close of the legislative session to ensure that they do not impede desegregation. In April 1997, copies of all laws passed during the 1997 Regular Session of the 81st General Assembly were requested from the office of the ADE Liaison to the Legislature for distribution to the Districts for their input and review of possible impediments to their desegregation efforts. In August 1997, a meeting to review the statutes passed in the prior legislative session was scheduled for September 9, 1997. 32 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) On September 9, 1997, a meeting was held to discuss the review of the statutes passed in the prior legislative session and new ADE regulations. The Districts will be contacted in writing for their input regarding any new laws or regulations that they feel may impede desegregation. Additionally, the Districts will be asked to review their regulations to ensure that they do not impede their desegregation efforts. The committee will convene on December 1, 1997 to review their findings and finalize their report to the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. In October 1997, the Distric~ were asked to review new regulations and statutes for impediments to their desegregation efforts, and advise the ADE, in writing, if they feel a regulation or statute may impede their desegregation efforts. In October 1997, the Districts were requested to advise the ADE, in writing, no later than November 1, 1997 of any new law that might impede their desegregation efforts. As of November 12, 1997, no written responses were received from the Districts. The ADE concludes that the Districts do not feel that any new law negatively impacts their desegregation efforts. The committee met on December 1, 1997 to discuss their findings regarding statutes and regulations that may impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. The committee concluded that there were no laws or regulations that impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. It was decided that the committee chair would prepare a report of the committee's findings for the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation is now reviewing proposed bills and regulations, as well as laws that are being signed in, for the current 1999 legislative session. They will continue to do so until the session is over. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation will meet on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The committee met on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The purpose of the meeting was to identify rules and regulations that might impede desegregation, and review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. This is a standing committee that is ongoing and a report will be submitted to the State Board of Education once the process is completed. 33 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) The committee met on May 24, 1999 at the ADE. The committee was asked to review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. The committee determined that Mr. Ray Lumpkin would contact the Pulaski County districts to request written response to any rules, regulations or laws that might impede desegregation. The committee would also collect information and data to prepare a report for the State Board. This will be a standing committee. This data gathering will be ongoing until the final report is given to the State Board. On July 26, 1999, the committee met at the ADE. The committee did not report any laws or regulations that they currently thought would impede desegregation, and are still waiting for a response from the three districts in Pulaski County. The committee met on August 30, 1999 at the ADE to review rules and regulations that might impede desegregation. At that time, there were no laws under review that appeared to impede desegregation. In November, the three districts sent letters to the ADE stating that they have reviewed the laws passed by the 82nd legislative session as well as current rules \u0026amp; regulations and district policies to ensure that they have no ill effect on desegregation efforts. There was some concern from PCSSD concerning a charter school proposal in the Maumelle area. The work of the committee is on-going each month depending on the information that comes before the committee. Any rules, laws or regulations that would impede desegregation will be discussed and reported to the State Board of Education. On October 4, 2000, the ADE presented staff development for assistant superintendents in LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD regarding school laws of Arkansas. The ADE is in the process of forming a committee to review all Rules and Regulations from the ADE and State Laws that might impede desegregation. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will review all new laws that might impede desegregation once the 83rd General Assembly has completed this session. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will meet for the first time on June 11, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. in room 204-A at the ADE. The committee will review all new laws that might impede desegregation that were passed during the 2001 Legislative Session. 34 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 201 O (Continued) The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations rescheduled the meeting that was planned for June 11, in order to review new regulations proposed to the State Board of Education. The meeting will take place on July 16, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on July 16, 2001 at the ADE. The following Items were discussed: (1) Review of 2001 state laws which appear to impede desegregation. (2) Review of existing ADE regulations which appear to impede desegregation. (3) Report any laws or regulations found to impede desegregation to the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts. The next meeting will take place on August 27, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on August 27, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on September 10, 2001 in Conference Room 204-B at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on September 10, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on October 24, 2001 in Conference Room 204-B at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on October 24, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. On December 17, 2001 , the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation composed letters that will be sent to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. Laws to review include those of the 83rd General Assembly, ADE regulations, and regulations of the Districts. 35 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) On January 10, 2002, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to respond by March 8, 2002. On March 5, 2002, a letter was sent from the LRSD which mentioned Act 1748 and Act 1667 passed during the 83rd Legislative Session which may impede desegregation. These laws will be researched to determine if changes need to be made. A letter was sent from the NLRSD on March 19, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation. On April 26, 2002, a letter was sent for the PCSSD to the ADE, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation except the \"deannexation\" legislation which the District opposed before the Senate committee. On October 27, 2003, the ADE sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County asking if there were any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to review laws passed during the 84th Legislative Session, any new ADE rules or regulations, and district policies. In July 2007, the ADE sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County asking if there were any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to review laws passed during the 86th Legislative Session, and any new ADE rules or regulations. 36 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES A. Through a preamble to the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 The preamble was contained in the Implementation Plan filed with the Court on March 15, 1994. B. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 Ongoing C. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement by actions taken by ADE in response to monitoring results. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 Ongoing D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 37 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 At each regular monthly meeting of the State Board of Education, the Board is provided copies of the most recent Project Management Tool (PMT) and an executive summary of the PMT for their review and approval. Only activities that are in addition to the Board's monthly review of the PMT are detailed below. In May 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the total number of schools visited during the monitoring phase and the data collection process. Suggestions were presented to the State Board of Education on how recommendations could be presented in the monitoring reports. In June 1995, an update on the status of the pending Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the State Board of Education. In July 1995, the July Semiannual Monitoring Report was reviewed by the State Board of Education. On August 14, 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the need to increase minority participation in the teacher scholarship program and provided tentative monitoring dates to facilitate reporting requests by the ADE administrative team and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In September 1995, the State Board of Education was advised of a change in the PMT from a table format to a narrative format. The Board was also briefed about a meeting with the Office of Desegregation Monitoring regarding the PMT. In October 1995, the State Board of Education was updated on monitoring timelines. The Board was also informed of a meeting with the parties regarding a review of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and the monitoring process, and the progress of the test validation study. In November 1995, a report was made to the State Board of Education regarding the monitoring schedule and a meeting with the parties concerning the development of a common terminology for monitoring purposes. In December 1995, the State Board of Education was updated regarding announced monitoring visits. In January 1996, copies of the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the State Board of Education. 38 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) During the months of February 1996 through May 1996, the PMT report was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. In June 1996, the State Board of Education was updated on the status of the bias review study. In July 1996, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the Court, the parties, ODM, the State Board of Education, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In August 1996, the State Board of Education and the ADE administrative team were provided with copies of the test validation study prepared by Dr. Paul Williams. During the months of September 1996 through December 1996, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. On January 13, 1997, a presentation was made to the State Board of Education regarding the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report, and copies of the report and its executive summary were distributed to all Board members. The Project Management Tool and its executive summary were addressed at the February 10, 1997 State Board of Education meeting regarding the ADE's progress in fulfilling their obligations as set forth in the Implementation Plan. In March 1997, the State Board of Education was notified that historical information in the PMT had been summarized at the direction of the Assistant Attorney General in order to reduce the size and increase the clarity of the report. The Board was updated on the Pulaski County Desegregation Case and reviewed the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued by the Court on February 18, 1997 in response to the Districts' motion for summary judgment on the issue of state funding for teacher retirement matching contributions. During the months of April 1997 through June 1997, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. The State Board of Education received copies of the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and executive summary at the July Board meeting. 39 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on August 4, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. A special report regarding a historical review of the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement and the ADE's role and monitoring obligations were presented to the State Board of Education on September 8, 1997. Additionally, the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Board for their review. In October 1997, a special draft report regarding disparity in achievement was submitted to the State Board Chairman and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In November 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on November 3, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. In December 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. In January 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and discussed ODM's report on the ADE's monitoring activities and instructed the Director to meet with the parties to discuss revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. In February 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and discussed the February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report. In March 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary and was provided an update regarding proposed revisions to the monitoring process. In April 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In May 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. 40 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) In June 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also reviewed how the ADE would report progress in the PMT concerning revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In July 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also received an update on Test Validation, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee Meeting, and revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In August 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the five discussion points regarding the proposed revisions to the monitoring and reporting process. The Board also reviewed the basic goal of the Minority Recruitment Committee. In September 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed the proposed modifications to the Monitoring plans by reviewing the common core of written response received from the districts. The primary commonalities were (1) Staff Development, (2) Achievement Disparity and (3) Disciplinary Disparity. A meeting of the parties is scheduled to be conducted on Thursday, September 17, 1998. The Board encouraged the Department to identify a deadline for Standardized Test Validation and Test Selection. In October 1998, the Board received the progress report on Proposed Revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring and Reporting Process (see XVIII). The Board also reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In November, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the proposed revisions in the Desegregation monitoring Process and the update on Test validation and Test Selection provisions of the Settlement Agreement. The Board was also notified that the Implementation Plan Working Committee held its quarterly meeting to review progress and identify quarterly priorities. In December, the State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion by the ADE, the LRSD, NLRSD, and the PCSSD, to relieve the Department of its obligation to file a February Semiannual Monitoring Report. The Board was also notified that the Joshua lnterveners filed a motion opposing the joint motion. The Board was informed that the ADE was waiting on a response from Court. 41 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) In January, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion of the ADE, LRSD, PCSSD, and NLRSD for an order relieving the ADE of filing a February 1999 Monitoring Report. The motion was granted subject to the following three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua interveners of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement. In February, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was informed that the three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua lnterveners of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in w_hich ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement had been satisfied. The Joshua lnterveners were invited again to attend the meeting of the parties and they attended on January 13, and January 28, 1999. They are also scheduled to attend on February 17, 1998. The report of progress, a collaborative effort from all parties was presented to court on February 1, 1999. The Board was also informed that additional items were received for inclusion in the revised report, after the deadline for the submission of the progress report and the ADE would: (1) check them for feasibility, and fiscal impact if any, and (2) include the items in future drafts of the report. In March, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received and reviewed the Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Progress Report submitted to Court on February 1, 1999. On April 12, and May 10, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On June 14, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. 42 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) On July 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On August 9, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On September 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On October 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was notified that on September 21 , 1999 that the Office of Education Lead Planning and Desegregation Monitoring meet before the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee and presented them with the draft version of the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan. The State Board was notified that the plan would be submitted for Board review and approval when finalized. On November 8, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. 43 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) On May 8, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 12, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 11 , 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 9, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 11 , 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 8, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 12, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 12, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 9, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 14, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 11 , 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. 44 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) On July 9, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 13, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 10, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 8, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 19, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 10, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 11 , 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 11 , 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 13, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 10, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 12, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. 45 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) On September 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 14,  2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 18, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 14, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 12, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 9, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 11 , 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 8, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. 46 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) On January 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 10, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 14, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 11 , 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On January 10, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of November and December. On February 14, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 14, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 11 , 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. 47 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) On May 9, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 13, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 11 , 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 8, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 12, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 10, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 14, 2005, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On January 9, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of November and December. On February 13, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 13, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 10, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 8, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 12, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 10, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. 48 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) On August 14, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 11 , 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 9, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 13, 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 11 , 2006, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 17, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 12, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 12, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 9, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 14, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 11, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 9, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 13, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 10, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. 49 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) On October 8, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 5, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 10, 2007, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 15, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 11 , 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 10, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 21 , 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 12, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 9, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 14, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 11 , 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 8, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 13, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 3, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. 50 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) On December 8, 2008, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 12, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 9, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 16, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 13, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 11 , 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 8, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 13, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 10, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 14, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 12, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 9, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 14, 2009, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 19, 2010, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 8, 2010, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. 51 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 3. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) On March 8, 2010, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 12, 2010, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 10, 2010, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 14, 2010, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 12, 2010, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 9, 2010, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 13, 2010, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. 52 VI. REMEDIATION A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 During May 1995, team visits to Cycle 4 schools were conducted, and plans were developed for reviewing the Cycle 5 schools. In June 1995, the current Extended COE packet was reviewed, and enhancements to the Extended COE packet were prepared. In July 1995, year end reports were finalized by the Pulaski County field service specialists, and plans were finalized for reviewing the draft improvement plans of the Cycle 5 schools. In August 1995, Phase I - Cycle 5 school improvement plans were reviewed. Plans were developed for meeting with the Districts to discuss plans for Phase II - Cycle 1 schools of Extended COE, and a school improvement conference was conducted in Hot Springs. The technical review visits for the FY 95/96 year and the documentation process were also discussed. In October 1995, two computer programs, the Effective Schools Planner and the Effective Schools Research Assistant, were ordered for review, and the first draft of a monitoring checklist for Extended COE was developed. Through the Extended COE process, the field service representatives provided technical assistance based on the needs identified within the Districts from the data gathered. In November 1995, ADE personnel discussed and planned for the FY 95/96 monitoring, and onsite visits were conducted to prepare schools for the FY 95/96 team visits. Technical review visits continued in the Districts. In December 1995, announced monitoring and technical assistance visits were conducted in the Districts. At December 31, 1995, approximately 59% of the schools in the Districts had been monitored. Technical review visits were conducted during January 1996. In February 1996, announced monitoring visits and midyear monitoring reports were completed, and the field service specialists prepared for the spring NCA/COE peer team visits. 53 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) In March 1996, unannounced monitoring visits of Cycle 5 schools commenced, and two-day peer team visits of Cycle 5 schools were conducted. Two-day team visit materials, team lists and reports were prepared. Technical assistance was provided to schools in final preparation for team visits and to schools needing any school improvement information. In April and May 1996, the unannounced monitoring visits were completed. The unannounced monitoring forms were reviewed and included in the July monitoring report. The two-day peer team visits were completed, and annual COE monitoring reports were prepared. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits of the Cycle 5 schools were completed, and the data was analyzed. The Districts identified enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996, and copies were distributed to the parties. During August 1996, meetings were held with the Districts to discuss the monitoring requirements. Technical assistance meetings with Cycle 1 schools were planned for 96/97. The Districts were requested to record discipline data in accordance with the Allen Letter. In September 1996, recommendations regarding the ADE monitoring schedule for Cycle 1 schools and content layouts of the semiannual report were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. Training materials were developed and schedules outlined for Cycle 1 schools. In October 1996, technical assistance needs were identified and addressed to prepare each school for their team visits. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996. In December 1996, the announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools were completed, and technical assistance needs were identified from school site visits. In January 1997, the ECOE monitoring section identified technical assistance needs of the Cycle 1 schools, and the data was reviewed when the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, the State Board of Education, and the parties. 54 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) In February 1997, field service specialists prepared for the peer team visits of the Cycle 1 schools. NCA accreditation reports were presented to the NCA Committee, and NCA reports were prepared for presentation at the April NCA meeting in Chicago. From March to May 1997, 111 visits were made to schools or central offices to work with principals, ECOE steering committees, and designated district personnel concerning school improvement planning. A workshop was conducted on Learning Styles for Geyer Springs Elementary School. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 15-17, 1997. The conference included information on the process of continuous school improvement, results of the first five years of COE, connecting the mission with the school improvement plan, and improving academic performance. Technical assistance needs were evaluated for the FY 97/98 school year in August 1997. From October 1997 to February 1998, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives. Technical assistance was provided to the Districts through meetings with the ECOE steering committees, assistance in analyzing perceptual surveys, and by providing samples of school improvement plans, Gold File catalogs, and web site addresses to schools visited. Additional technical assistance was provided to the Districts through discussions with the ECOE committees and chairs about the process. In November 1997, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives in conjunction with the announced monitoring visits. Workshops on brainstorming and consensus building and asking strategic questions were held in January and February 1998. In March 1998, the field service representatives conducted ECOE team visits and prepared materials for the NCA workshop. Technical assistance was provided in workshops on the ECOE process and team visits. In April 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process and academically distressed schools. In May 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process, and team visits were conducted. 55 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 (Continued) In June 1998, the Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 13-15, 1998. Major conference topics included information on the process of continuous school improvement, curriculum alignment, \"Smart Start,\" Distance Learning, using data to improve academic performance, educational technology, and multicultural education. All school districts in Arkansas were invited and representatives from Pulaski County attended. In September 1998, requests for technical assistance were received, visitation schedules were established, and assistance teams began visiting the Districts. Assistance was provided by telephone and on-site visits. The ADE provided inservice train ing on \"Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement\" at Gibbs Magnet Elementary school on October 5, 1998 at their request. The staff was taught how to increase test scores through data disaggregation, analysis, alignment, longitudinal achievement review, and use of individualized test data by student, teacher, class and content area. Information was also provided regarding the \"Smart Start\" and the \"Academic Distress\" initiatives. On October 20, 1998, ECOE technical assistance was provided to Southwest Jr. High School. B. Identify available resources for providing technical assistance for the specific condition, or circumstances of need, considering resources within ADE and the Districts, and also resources available from outside sources and experts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. C. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 56 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) C. D. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2010 An updated ERIC Search was conducted on May 15, 1995 to locate research on evaluating compensatory education programs. The ADE received the updated ERIC disc that covered material through March 1995. An ERIC search was conducted in September 30, 1996 to identify current research dealing with the evaluation of compensatory education programs, and the articles were reviewed. An ERIC search was conducted in April 1997 to identify current research on compensatory education programs and sent to the Cycle 1 principals and the field service specialists fo\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1745","title":"Court filing concerning plaintiff's response to Joshua intervernor's request reconsideration and motion for new trial, Joshua intervernor's motion for relief concerning the Office of Desegregation Management budget, Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) motions for approval of middle school, other motions and memorandum attached.","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["2002-10"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st century","Education--Arkansas","School districts","Little Rock School District","Joshua intervenors","Education--Evaluation","African Americans--Education"],"dcterms_title":["Court filing concerning plaintiff's response to Joshua intervernor's request reconsideration and motion for new trial, Joshua intervernor's motion for relief concerning the Office of Desegregation Management budget, Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) motions for approval of middle school, other motions and memorandum attached."],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1745"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["26 page scan, typed"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\u003c?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"utf-8\"?\u003e\n\u003citems type=\"array\"\u003e  \u003citem\u003e   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_description type=\"array\"\u003e   \n\n\u003cdcterms_description\u003eDistrict Court, order; District Court, plaintiff's response to Joshua intervenors' October 1, 2002, letter; District Court, plaintiff's response to Joshua intervenors' motion for reconsideration and motion for new trial; District Court, Joshua intervenors' supplement to motion; District Court, two orders; District Court, the Joshua intervenors' motion for relief concerning the Office of Desegregation Management budget; District Court, the Joshua intervenors' memorandum concerning the Office of Desegregation Management budget; District Court, order; District Court, Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) motion for approval of middle school site; District Court, memorandum in support of Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) motion for approval of middle school site; District Court, motion for hearing regarding relevance of 28 U.S.C. 455 to the present proceedings; District Court, the Joshua intervenors' motion to stay reduction of Office of Desegregation Management staff; District Court, order; District Court, plaintiff's response to Joshua intervenors' motion for hearing regarding the relevance of 28 U.S.C. 455 to the present proceeding; District Court, memorandum brief in support of plaintiff's response to Joshua intervenors' motion for hearing regarding the relevance of 28 U.S.C. 455 to the present proceeding; District Court, order denying motion for hearing regarding relevance of 28 U.S.C. 455 to the present proceedings; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool    This transcript was create using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff, vs. * * * * -PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL * DISTRICT NO. 1, et al., * 4:82CV00866 u.fo1{k,~CQRT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS OCT O l 2002 JAME~~  l!:ly: ~ 2 - ,   . Defendants, * * RECEIVED MRS. LOREN JOSHUA, et al., * lntervenors, KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al., lntervenors, * * * * OCT - 3 2002 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING ORDER Attached is a copy of a letter from Mr. Walker dated October 1, 2002. presume it should be treated as a motion of some kind. Accordingly other counsel of record may respond within the time permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 1st day of October, 2002. THIS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON GOCKET SHt'.:ET !N COMPLIANCE ~vv i1r.~i RMuLi::: 58 AND'C'R~ gr. RCF ,.,, ,,.., ,--.,(  ' - - - - - - v. ___ - 0 -- - - - - 6 8 0 JOHN W. WALKER SHAWN CHILDS JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. ATTORNEY AT LAw 1 723 BROADWAY LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72206 TELEPHONE (501) 3743758 FAX (501) 3744187 October 1, 2002 Honorable Judge William R. Wilson United States District Court 600 West Capitol, Suite 423 Little Rock, AR 72201 I Re: Little Rock School v. Pulaski County School Case No. 4:82CV00866 Dear Judge Wilson: OCT - 2 2002 OFACE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING OF COUNSEL ROBERT McHENRY. P.A. DONNA J. McHENRY 8210 HENDERSON ROAD LITTLE ROCK. ARKANSAS 72210 PHONE: (501) 372-3425  FAX (501) 372-3428 EwuL: mchenryd@swbell.net On page 172 of your Order of September 13, 2002, you determine a compliance remedy with respect to the Joshua Intervenors, Section D. You also require the ODM to monitor LRSD's compliance with Section 2. 7.1. May I bring to your attention that the remedy being imposed is not preceded by any court order determining and defining the parameter of Joshua's monitoring. Those issues were not before the Court. The Court now determines that Joshua must monitor and must immediately bring to the LRSD 's attention all problems that are detected as the court has determined those problems to be. In doing so, the Court seems to impose a greater burden upon Joshua than it has imposed upon the Office of Desegregation Monitoring. I, therefore, would like to request that the Court define the nature of the monitoring that it expects ofJoshua, i.e. access to information by Little Rock, cost of production of such information, access to staff responsible for fulfilling the obligations (must this be done in writing with communication directed to LRSD counsel), and so forth. I believe that it would be appropriate for the Court to spell out the obligations which it now imposes upon Joshua and the legal basis therefor in view of the fact that the remedy defined was not sought by LRSD or any party. I also note that LRSD is not required to inform Joshua of anything set forth on pages 170 through 1 72 except to provide a compliance report on or before March 15, 2004. I must also object to Court's imposing monitoring requirements upon Joshua that were contemplated to be the responsibility of the ODM. The Court's comments indicate that it does not forsee or require a continued responsibility for monitoring of the intensity which the Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit required. In this respect, we note that the Court created the ODM and expected the ODM to carefully monitor on a daily basis, full-time, the activities of the Little Rock Page 2- Letter to Judge Wilson October 1, 2002 and other school districts. By placing the responsibility that you appear to place on Joshua, unless clarification otherwise provides, the Court is shifting the required monitoring from the ODM to Joshua. We do not believe that to be fair or reasonable. Before your final order is entered, and becomes appealable, I respectfully request a hearing on this matter so that an appropriate record on the issues of the role of ODM monitoring and Joshua monitoring may be fully developed. JWW:js cc: All Counsel of Record Ms. Ann Marshall IN THE UN1TED STATES DISTRJCT COURT EASTERN DISTRJCT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRJCT V. NO.4:82CV00866 WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRJCT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KA THERJNE KNIGHT, ET AL RECEIVED OCT - 8 .too2 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO JOSHUA INTERVENORS OCTOBER 1, 2002 LETTER PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTER VEN ORS INTER VEN ORS For its response to the Joshua Intervenors' (\"Joshua\") October 1, 2002 letter, Plaintiff Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") states: 1. For more than decade, Joshua has reported to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals and to the District Court that it was engaged in the process of monitoring LRSD's compliance with LRSD's various desegregation obligations. At one oral argument, counsel for Joshua introduced a number of Joshua monitors to the panel of the Court of Appeals. 2. The 1998 Revised Desegregation and Education Plan formalized a process for resolving any desegregation compliance problems which were discovered during the course of Joshua's monitoring. The obvious purpose of that process, which is found beginning at  8.2 of the Revised Plan, was to allow the quick resolution of any compliance issues for the benefit of both the - Joshua class members and the LRSD. 3. There is nothing on page 172 of the Court's September 13, 2002 Order which imposes upon the Joshua Intervenors any obligations which are not contained in the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan or inherent in the class representatives' and class counsel's obligations to the class members. 4. The Court's September 13, 2002 Order followed weeks of litigation about issues which Joshua did not raise with the LRSD during the term of the Revised Plan. By requiring that Joshua and LRSD follow the \"process for raising compliance issues\" set forth in 8.2, et. film. of the Revised Plan, the Court is simply requiring the parties to abide by the terms of their own agreement. 5. TheLRSD can find in the Court's Order no basis for Joshua's argument that the Court has somehow imposed \"a greater burden upon Joshua than it has imposed upon the Office of Desegregation Monitoring.\" The LRSD does not read the Court's Order as \"imposing\" any burden upon either Joshua or the ODM which did not exist for years prior to the Court's Order. 6. The Court should decline Joshua's request \"for the Court to spell out the obligations which it now imposes upon Joshua.\" Nothing is required of Joshua that Joshua should not have been doing all along. The Court has simply let the parties know that in addition to 2.7.1 of the Revised Plan, their agreement with respect to the resolution of compliance issues remains viable. The Court's Order continues a sensible and efficient system for resolving compliance issues and puts Joshua on notice that objections raised for the first time on April 15, 2004 which were not raised pursuant to the compliance process could be subject to an argument that those issues have been waived. 7. The Court should require that any future requests for relief submitted by Joshua should be placed in the form of a Motion and filed pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this Court. WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth above, Joshua's letter/motion of October 1, 2002 should be denied. Respectfully submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRJCT FRJDA Y, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK Christopher Heller (#81083) John C. Fendley, Jr. (#92182) 2000 Regions Center 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 (501) 376-2011 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the following people by depositing a copy of same in the United States mail on October 7, 2002. Mr. John W. Walker JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Sam Jones Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 2200 Nations Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 425 W. Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201-3472 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell Law Firm 11800 Pleasant Ridge Road, Suite 146 P. 0 . Box 17388 Little Rock, AR 72222 Ms. Ann Marshall Desegregation Monitor 1 Union National Plaza 124 W. Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Dennis R. Hansen Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KA THERINE KNIGHT, ET AL RECEIVED OCT - 8 2002 OFFICEOF DESEGREGATIO.MONITORING PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTER VEN ORS INTER VEN ORS PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO JOSHUA INTERVENOR'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL Plaintiff Little Rock School District (hereinafter \"LRSD\") for its Response to Joshua Intervenor's (hereinafter \"Joshua\") Motion for Reconsideration and Motion for New Trial states: The LRSD will respond to each numbered paragraph of Joshua 's Motion for Reconsideration in tum. 1. The Court's use of the term \"supervision\" on page 2 its September 13, 2002, Memorandum Opinion (hereinafter \"Opinion\") was appropriate. It is common for a school district implementing a court ordered desegregation decree to be referred to as being under court \"supervision.\" See Freeman v. Pitts, 503 U.S . 467, 471 (1992)(\"The DCSS has been subject to the supervision and jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia since 1969 . .. \" (emphasis supplied)). The Office of Desegregation Monitoring (\"ODM\") acted under the authority of the Court to supervise the LRSD. 2. Evidence related to Joshua's failure to raise compliance issues during the term of the LRSD's Revised Desegregation and Education Plan (hereinafter \"Revised Plan\") was relevant to the Board's good faith, to assist the Court in interpreting the Revised Plan, and to the Board 's estoppel defense. 3. The ODM works for the Court, and it is entirely appropriate for the Court to define its role and for the Court to take into account the LRSD's position with regard to ex parte contact between the Court and ODM. 4. Joshua cannot blame their failure to come forward with evidence on the Court's focus on \"brevity and substance.\" In any event, Joshua agreed to narrow the issues and the time limits imposed by the Court and cannot now be heard to complain. See Tr. Dec. 11 , 2001 , pp. 36-37. 5. The LRSD denies that footnote 15 on page 9 gives the impression that Joshua counsel have been involved in this case since 1982. The record is clear that Joshua intervened ' only after the LRSD prevailed in this case. While the 1989 Settlement Agreement did also resolve the Clark and Cooper cases, the Court is correct that this is a 20 year-old case. 6. The Court correctly noted that the claims for relief and remedies sought differ in the present case from Clark. Clark was simply a continuation of the Cooper case filed in 1956 asking that \"an injunction be issued against continued segregation of the races in the Little Rock public school system.\" Aaron v. Cooper, 243 F.2d 361 , 362 (8th Cir. 1957). The LRSD filed this case in 1982 seeking consolidation of the three Pulaski County school districts based on interdistrict constitutional violations by the other districts and the State of Arkansas. See LRSD v. PCSSD, 584 F.Supp. 328 (E.D. Ark. 1984). The LRSD denies that either the late Honorable Henry Woods or Special Master Aubrey McCutcheon found that the LRSD continued to unlawfully discriminate against African-American students. 7. The LRSD denies that the information in footnote 47 on pages 26 and 27 is inaccurate. It is entirely appropriate for the Court to evaluate and comment on ODM's productivity. Nothing in the Court's opinion suggests that the Court has violated or intends to violate the Eighth Circuit's mandate. 8. The LRSD denies that the ODM has been in an \"advisory position to the LRSD\" since December 27, 1996. The ODM returned to its monitoring role at the conclusion of the 2 Revised Plan's transition period. See Revised Plan,  10. Nothing in the Court's opinion suggests that counsel for Joshua was to take over the ODM's monitoring responsibilities. Counsel for Joshua was obligated to monitor the LRSD based their ethical duty to their clients and their implied contractual duty to the LRSD. 9. The LRSD denies that the Court's discussion of Joshua's 1996 request for attorneys' fees indicates bias or hostility toward counsel for Joshua, implies collusion between the lawyers, suggests Judge Wright did not know the tenns of the settlement, complains unfairly that a matter on appeal should not be resolved by the parties, suggests that Joshua's counsel agreed to assume the role of ODM, or holds counsel for Joshua to public contempt for being paid. As to counsel for Joshua's attempt to justify the monito.ring fees paid by the LRSD, the LRSD denies that counsel for Joshua attended \"hundreds of meetings\" with school District officials, that counsel for Joshua was ever \"threatened with arrest,\" and that the LRSD revised its policies because of counsels' \"persistence and vigor.\" The LRSD also denies the implication that - counsel for Joshua was responsible for the additional funding the three Pulaski County districts receive from the State by virtue of litigation related to the 1989 Settlement Agreement. While the discussion of professional fees is not directly related to the issues before the Court, the Court was free to include this discussion in its opinion. 10. The LRSD denies that the testimony ofDrs. Walberg and Armor was inapposite to the issues before this Court. Their testimony provides the context in which the LRSD and Joshua agreed to the Revised Plan and the basis on which the Court approved the Revised Plan, both of which are relevant to interpreting Revised Plan 2.7. 11 . The LRSD denies that there is no evidentiary basis for the Court's finding that ODM and Joshua did not object to the LRSD's Interim Compliance Report. Dr. Bonnie Lesley testified to this fact (Tr. Nov. 19, 2001 , p. 287), and it is stated in the introduction to the LRSD's Final Compliance Report (CX 870, p. iv.). 3 12. The LRSD denies that the Court was required to share with the parties any criticisms it had of ODM's June 14, 2000, discipline report. The LRSD's Interim Compliance Report was admitted into evidence as CX 869. The LRSD denies that the issue of discipline was not ripe for objection after the LRSD filed its Interim Compliance Report. Dr. Linda Watson testified that ODM and Joshua were regularly provided copies of the District's Disciplinary Management Reports. See Tr. Nov. 19, 2001, p. 83. 13. The Court is correct that Joshua failed to present any evidence that the LRSD was not in substantial compliance with its obligations regarding faculty and staff, student assignment, special education and related programs, parental involvement and school construction and closing. Joshua did not present any evidence on these issues:precisely because it abandoned those arguments. See Tr. Dec. 11, 2001 , pp. 36-37. Joshua cannot now be heard to complain that the Court did not allow Joshua to present evidence on those issues. 14. The Court found that Revised Plan  8.2 did not expressly require Joshua to raise compliance issues pursuant to the process set forth therein. See Memorandum Opinion, p. 89. Even so, evidence of Joshua's failure to raise compliance issues was relevant to the Board's good faith, to assist the Court in interpreting the Revised Plan, and to the Board's estoppel defense. The LRSD denies that there was \"much evidence that Joshua regularly brought matters of compliance to the attention of the school district administrators.\" 15. Footnote 2 of the Revised Plan is unambiguous, and the Court correctly interpreted the plain language of the footnote. The LRSD denies that Joshua introduced evidence \"that certain goals were to have been fully met while others would be ongoing.\" 16. The LRSD denies that the Court must presume \"that there is a correlation between student achievement and money expenditures by school districts.\" The LRSD also denies that only conclusion to be drawn from any continuing racial disparity in achievement is that the beneficiaries of desegregation funding have been white students. Joshua's argument ignores the fact that the racial disparity in achievement exists when students arrive for their first day of 4 school. As Drs. Wal berg and Armor explained, it would be impossible for the LRSD to eliminate the racial disparity in achievement given the current racial disparity in socioeconomic status. 17. The LRSD denies that the Court improperly referred to the Green factors. The Revised Plan constituted an agreement voluntarily entered into by the LRSD. The LRSD entered into that agreement because it believed implementation of the Revised Plan was in the best interest of Afucan-American students, and indeed, all students in the District. 18. The Court is correct that in this case the LRSD has never been adjudicated a \"constitutional violator.\" The LRSD denies that it was held in contempt during the implementation of the 1990 settlement plan. 19. The Court correctly interpreted Revised Plan  2. 7 as not requiring the LRSD to eliminate or reduce the racial disparity in achievement. Joshua sought to use the racial disparity in achievement to establish the LRSD's noncompliance with Revised Plan 2.7, and the Court correctly placed the burden of proof on Joshua to establish a causal connection between the current racial disparity in achievement and the LRSD's alleged noncompliance. 20. The Court acknowledged that the Revised Plan did not expressly require Joshua to raise an issue pursuant to Revised Plan  8 before it could object to the LRSD's final report. See Memorandum Opinion, p. 89. 21. The LRSD will respond to each subparagraph of paragraph 21 in tum: (a) The Court drew a reasonable inference from the fact that Joshua failed to further pursue these issues and from Baker Kurrus's testimony that he asked Dr. Carnine to work with Joshua to resolve these issues. See Tr. July 24, 2002, p. 751. (b) Dr. Lacey so testified (Tr. July 24, 2002, p. 777), and no \"record of past actions\" is required for the Court to credit the testimony of a witness. ( c) Joshua points to nothing in the \"record\" which would indicate that the Court's characterization is erroneous. 5 (d) In fact, Junious Babbs testified that ODM and Joshua were provided copies of the Compliance Plan and Compliance Handbook.Court. See Tr. July 5, 2001, pp. 73, 77 and 78. Moreover, ODM's August 11 , 1999 report establishes that ODM received both. See pp. 39 and 40. Counsel's suggestion on cross-examination that Joshua did not receive them is not evidence. See Eight Circuit Model Jury Instructions (Civil) 1.02 (2001). Thus, the only evidence before the Court was testimony that ODM and Joshua did receive the Compliance Plan and Compliance Handbook. (e) The record in this case includes motions by the LRSD after Joshua filed its objections to stop counsel for Joshua from entering the offices of LRSD staff members unexpectedly and from using the Freedom of Information Act (\"FOIA\") to conduct discovery. Joshua's opposition to these motions provides ample support in the record for the Court's finding. (f) The Revised Plan did not prohibit the LRSD from holding meetings without Joshua being present. Thus, there was no \"failure\" for the Court to excuse. (g) The Court correctly found that Revised Plan  2.5 did not require the LRSD to eliminate or reduce the racial disparity in discipline. (h) The criticisms offered by the Court were readily apparent from the report itself, and Joshua cannot blame the Court for failing to put it on notice of these shortcomings. (i) The suspension index is a well-recognized statistic and has been explained in numerous desegregation cases. See, li, Hoots v. Pennsylvania, 118 F.Supp.2d 577, 608 n.25 (W.D. Pa. 2000). The Court was free to accept the LRSD's calculations which were admitted into evidence without objection. See CX 743 . (j) The Court correctly interpreted Revised Plan  2.5 as not requiring the LRSD to eliminate or reduce the racial disparity in discipline. Joshua sought to use the racial disparity in discipline to establish the LRSD's noncompliance with Revised Plan  6 2.5, and the Court correctly placed the burden of proof on Joshua to establish a causal connection between the current racial disparity in discipline and the LRSD's alleged noncompliance. (k) The Court correctly noted that not a single student testified that he or she had been discriminated against in the imposition of discipline. The LRSD fails to see how the Court's admonition not to present cumulative evidence prevented Joshua from calling any students to testify during the hearings on Revised Plan  2.5 . (I) The Court's description of Dr. Watson's testimony is accurate given the ' context in which the statement was made. (m) The fact that African-American teachers suspended African-American students more than white teachers is not \"a finding ofracial mistreatment by AfricanAmerican teachers toward African-American students.\" (n) The Court's statement that \"students of all races tend to gravitate toward sports that they have grown up playing and that they enjoy'' does not condone racial disparities in activities. ( o) The only inference to be drawn from testimony of Ray Gillespie is that the LRSD responded appropriately when confronted with allegations that white coaches mistreated African-American student athletes. (p) The Court did not accept a \"means\" test for participation in activities. The LRSD presented evidence of the steps it took to ensure that no student was denied participation in an activity due to a financial barrier, and Joshua came forward with no evidence that a single student was denied participation in an activity because of a financial barrier. ( q) The Revised Plan did not require the LRSD to eliminate or reduce the racial disparity in the percentage of students taking AP courses. The LRSD has worked hard to increase the number of African-American students in AP courses, and it has done 7 so. The LRSD's success cannot be diminished by Joshua characterizing the LRSD's efforts as \"minuscule.\" (r) The Court gave due weight to the testimony of Jason Mercer and Ramona Horton. (s) The Court did not accept a \"means\" test for participation in the University Studies Program at Hall High School. It is true that Dr. Lacey did not identify the race of the student for whom a private donation was sought so the student could participate in the University Studies Program. See Tr. July 24, 2002, p. 802. However, it was reasonable for the Court to infer that the student was African-American for two reasons. First, when counsel for Joshua began this series of questions, he limited the question to AfricanAmerican students. See Tr. July 24, 2002, p. 801. Second, there was evidence that African-American students were more likely to be poor, and therefore, to be excluded by financial barriers to activities. See Tr. July 24, 2002, p. 602 and 624. (t) (u) The Court gave due weight to Ms. Watson's testimony. The Court correctly interpreted Revised Plan  2.7 as not requiring the LRSD to eliminate or reduce the racial disparity in achievement. (v) The Court may infer that counsel for Joshua read Revised Plan  2. 7 before agreeing to it, and therefore, knew what it required. (w) The Court is correct that Joshua did not raise the issue of the LRSD's March 19, 2001, agreement with the State of Arkansas in its Opposition to the LRSD's Motion for an Immediate Declaration of Unitary Status filed May 30, 2002. WHEREFORE, the LRSD prays that Joshua's Motion for Reconsideration; that Joshua's Motion for New Trial or in the Alternative Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order be denied; that the LRSD be awarded its costs and attorneys' fees expended herein; and that the LRSD be awarded all other just and proper relief to which it may be entitled. 8 F:\\HOME\\FENDLEY\\l..RSD 200 1\\unitary-rcsponsc-mot-rcconsider.wpd Respectfully Submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRJDA Y, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK Christopher Heller (#81083) John C. Fendley, Jr. (#92182) 2000 Regions Center 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 (501) 37 -\"1LM-+---- 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the following people by depositing a copy of same in the United States mail on October 7, 2002: Mr. John W. Walker JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Sam Jones Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 2200 Nations Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 425 W. Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201-3472 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell Law Firm 11800 Pleasant Ridge Road, Suite 146 Post Office Box 17388 Little Rock, Arkansas 72222-7388 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Marshall Desegregation Monitor 1 Union National Plaza 124 W. Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Dennis R. Hansen Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 F:\\J-IOME\\FENDLEY\\LRSD 2001 \\uni1ary-rcsporuc-mot-rccoruidcr wpd 10 : - JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. A't'TORNEY AT I.Aw 1723 l3RoADWAY Lrrru: RoCK, .AluWlsAS 7.2206 TE.t.EPRONE (501) 374-3758 FAX (501) 374-4187 JOHNW. WALKER SHAWN CHILDS OFCOUNsEL ROBERT Mc~1.~ DONNAJ. M=t 8210 liENtll!RSON BaAn Ll1't1.P. Roel[, .AiKANSAS 72210 l'BONE: (601) 572-8426  FAX (501) 372,.8428 EMan.: mchen:ryd@nrbell.net Honorable William R.Wilson United States District Judge 600 W. Capitol Suite 149 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Re: LRSD v. PCSSD Dear Judge Wilson: Via Facsimile: 604-5149 October 9, 2002 Tius is a supplement to my letter motion of October 1,2002. I appreciate the Court treating it as a motion, although I did not so couch it, and I believe that the appropriate action taken by the Court in inviting the parties to react will be most useful. 1 believe that it is important for me to specify, however, what Joshua believes it would be appropriate for the Court to do with respect to clarifying the monitoring role of the Office of Desegregation Monitoring. I am therefore asking that the Court conduct a hearing: ( a) to identify the instructions received by the Office of Desegregation. Monitoring (later referred as the ODM) regarding monitoring and reporting in reference to the LRSD's Motion for Unitary Status; (b) to consider whether the instructions received by the ODM were consistentmth the earlier identification ofODM's role as setfonh by the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit; and ( c) to identify with greater particularity ODM' s monitoring and reporting role regarding the three school districts, If the Court is inclined to have me fonnalize my October 1, 2002 letter and today's letter in motion form, I will be happy to do so. I am also writing to observe that the Joshua Intervenors filed a Motion for Reconsideration within the time allowed by law and that there has no response filed by either party within the rule time to our motion. Local Rule 7.2(b) requires that any party opposing our motion shall file such motion within eleven days. By my count, any opposing party should have filed its opposition not later th.an October 4, 2002. Today is obviously October 9, 2002. I am nor aware that the Court has a received a Motion to Extend the Time and I have not had a request from any counsel regarding an extension of such time. Page Two October 9, 2002 Accordmgly, we request that the Court role on the motion. JWW:lp cc: All Counsel of Record Ms. Ann Marshall Brown i _-t.ttorne-; at Law 17ZJ Broadwcry Ltrrle Roa:; _4.J-!car..sr::s 72206 Telephone (501) 374-3758 .Fzc (501) 37-~ '.' 187 F/4,X TR.-4.L\"'iSlY.!ISSION CO\"y'ER SEEET Da:i2: [ To: [ Fa..-c: l __ 3. c-..\u0026lt;-2 ...... r- d)-.:-.LJ_c_JP __ __,1 Re: ,. l Sender: [_= =g,;===luY-==========; YOU SHOu2D R.ECE.TVE [_ _ (including cover sheer)] P.:!..GE(S), fl'ICLUDING l'F..JS CO VER. S,--:.r;;''f:T. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES, P LE...:JSE CJ.LL \"\u0026lt;(501) 374-3758\u0026gt;\" The information coma.ineciin !his ~;mile meo:sage is atto:r-ey privilege:i and conficientfaJ. information intended only for the use of .b.e in.diviriual or en.rit-; nmned. above. If tile ruder of this m~sage is il.Ot tb.e intended recipient, or me ~ployee or agen, res-ponsibie to de.!iver it ro 1:le intended recipient, you sre b.ereoy .iotiiied ilint any cfuse:nination, di.'\"ll'founon or cop;1ing of cbis COIIlllluuication is stric:tiy prohiliii:ed. If you bave received. ihis commi'tni.c:icon in error, ple!:l!e immediate notify u.s by wlephoiie, md rerura the onginal messagi: .a J.l.:'J at the above address via .lie U.S. Postal s~:--lic:. Tilanic you. R CEIVED EAST~Rs~l~~e~~s s - CT 12 2002 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS OCT 1 1 2002 AO 72A (Rev.8/82) OFFICE OF LITTLE ROCK DIVISION JAMES W. DES REGATION MONITORING By: __~ ~~~.,..,J... ..... LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. No. 4:82CV00866 WRW/JTR PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. I, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KA THERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. ORDER PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTER VEN ORS INTER VEN ORS On September 24, 2002, Joshua lntervenors (\"Joshua\") filed: (a) a Substituted Motion for Reconsideration (docket no. 3678), 1 which asks me to revisit many aspects of the September 13, 2002 Memorandum Opinion (docket no. 3675) (\"Memorandum Opinion\") declaring the Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") to be unitary with regard to all aspects ofits operations under the Revised Plan (CX 871 ), except for 2.7.1; and (b) a Motion for New Trial or in the Alternative Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order ( docket no. 3677). On October 7, 2002, LRSD filed a Response to Joshua Intervenors ' Substituted Motion for Reconsideration and Motion for New 1On September 23, 2002, Joshua filed their first Motion for Reconsideration (docket no. 3676), which contained numerous errors. The next day, September 24, 2002, Joshua filed a second Motion for Reconsideration, which corrected most of those errors. I will consider this second motion as a Substituted Motion for Reconsideration, although it was not so designated. As a matter of fact, a motion for reconsideration is not recognized in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. They are, however, commonly filed and ruled upon in this jurisdiction--and I will hew to this custom. 3 6 8 4 AO 72A (Rev.8/82) Trial (docket no. 3682).2 After an initial review of Joshua's Substituted Motion for Reconsideration and Motion for New Trial, I considered summarily denying both motions on the ground that each of the arguments in support of reconsideration or a new trial is without any apparent merit. I believe that my 17 4-page Memorandum Opinion fully and accurately sets forth the relevant history of this case and that my detailed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are amply supported by the record and controlling legal authority. In short, I have given this case my best shot, and, if counsel for Joshua believe I have erred, they should ~ppeal my decision to the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Thus, on the merits, Joshua's arguments raise nothing that warrants comment beyond my stating I find they are without any factual support or legal foundation. However, to the extent that a number of Joshua's arguments tend to torque the Memorandum Opinion out of shape, and are supported only by speculation and personal innuendo, I think it best to set the record straight. First, Joshua suggests that I improperly \"faulted\" Joshua for failing to present evidence 2Under Rule 7 .2(b) of the Local Rules, LRSD's Response to Joshua's Substituted Motion for Reconsideration was due eleven days from September 24, 2002, and its Response to Joshua's Motion for a New Trial was due eleven days from September 23, 2002. Because Joshua's Substituted Motion for Reconsideration and Motion for New Trial were served on counsel for LRSD pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(B) (mail) and (D) (electronic means), an additional three days must be added to LRSD's eleven days. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(e). Thus, LRSD had fourteen days to respond to those motions, making its Response to Joshua's Motion for New Trial due on or before October 7 and its Response to Joshua's Substituted Motion for Reconsideration due on or before October 8. As indicated previously, LRSD filed its Response to both those Motions on October 7. In a letter dated October 9, 2002, Joshua's counsel asked me to strike LRSD's Response to those two motions because it was not filed within eleven days. Because Joshua's counsel overlooked Fed. R. Civ. P. S(b) and 6( e ), they miscalculated the deadline for the filing of LRSD 's Response to be October 4. Therefore, their request to strike that Response is denied. -2- A072A (Rev.8/82) on the March 19, 2001 Agreement between LRSD and the Arkansas Department of Education (CX 548). Substituted Motion for Reconsideration at 2. To the contrary, the Findings of Fact explicitly state that: The March 19, 2001 Agreement between the ADE and LRSD is unrelated to the question of whether LRSD has substantially complied with its obligations under the Revised Plan. It is important, too, that Joshua did not raise that issue as part ofits challenge to LRSD's request for an immediate declaration ofunitary status. Memorandum Opinion at 149, ,1 17 ( emphasis in original). Thus, although Joshua introduced CX 548 into evidence,3 I expressly did not consider it in deciding the unrelated question of whether LRSD had substantially complied with its obligatio.ris under the Revised Plan. Nowhere in my Memorandum Opinion do I \"fault\" Joshua for failing to produce evidence regarding the March 19, 200 l Agreement between LRSD and ADE--a subject that clearly was not before me in the hearings on unitary status. Second, Joshua contends that I should not have addressed \"the involvement of the ODM with respect to issues which were litigated before Judge Wright and Judge Wilson . . . [because] the competence of the ODM, the quality of the ODM reports, [and] the budget of the ODM .. . were not before the Court in evidentiary form .'\"' Substituted Motion for Reconsideration at 2, 6-7, and 10. The ODM, an employee of the district court, has monitored LRSD's compliance 3It strikes me as a little strange that Joshua introduced the March 19, 2001 Agreement into evidence during the hearing on unitary status and now argues, in their Substituted Motion for Reconsideration, that the document is irrelevant to the question of whether LRSD substantially complied with its obligations under the Revised Plan. I agree that the document is irrelevant to the issue of substantial compliance, but this begs the question of why Joshua chose to introduce the document into evidence in the first place. I remain puzzled. 4For the record, my Memorandum Opinion does not consider \"the competence of the ODM.\" -3- A072A (Rev.8/82) with its obligations under the 1990 Settlement Agreement, the 1992 Desegregation Plan, and the Revised Plan. Because the ODM works for the court, all of its budgets, as well as all of the reports it has prepared over the years, have been filed and are part of the record in this case. Historically, all of the parties and the court have used ODM reports, to the extent they were relevant, during the many hearings that have taken place since 1991. After being assigned this case in January of 2002, I carefully reviewed the entire record. In doing so, I examined the ODM 's annual budgets from 1990 to date. I was troubled by the large increases in the OD M's budget over that period of time. I was also troubled by the large sums of money that I discovered had been paid to the attorneys for both Joshua and the three school di stricts.5 While attorneys are unquestionably necessary in school desegregation cases, it is the school children who ultimately are disadvantaged by unnecessary or exorbitantly high litigation costs. Thus, I believe that it was entirely appropriate for me to express my views on the ODM's rapidly escalating budgets,6 which are part of the record in this case, and the total amount of money that has been paid to all of the attorneys in this case during the last ten to fifteen years. As footnote 58 makes clear, my concern is with the enormous amount of money that has been paid to the entire professional group--the ODM, the attorneys for LRSD, PCS SD, NLRSD, and Joshua. As I thought my admonition made clear on page 44 of the Memorandum Opinion, I believe the issue of the money paid to the professional group is important because \"I understand the meaning of being careful with a dollar, and I expect the professional group to keep that 51n most long-running school desegregation cases that have been decided in the last ten years, courts have expressed dismay over the high cost of school litigation. I now know why. 6See Memorandum Opinion at 26-27. -4- A072A (Rev.8/82_) _ important point fixed in their minds from here on out.\" Why Joshua's counsel seriously contend that I should not have addressed a subject of such obvious importance is beyond me. In the same vein, Joshua's counsel argue that I should not have commented on the quality of the ODM's June 14, 2000 Report of Disciplinary Sanctions in LRSD (docket no. 3366). Joshua's counsel used that Report extensively in his examination of various LRSD employees who testified during the hearings on unitary status. Joshua's decision to use that Report, one of the Court 's own documents, in his examination of witnesses on the issue of student discipline, required me to read and carefully analyze that do~ument. In doing so, I discovered patent deficiencies which rendered the Report of little use to the court or the parties in trying to determine the cause for African-American students being over-represented in disciplinary proceedings. Thus, in my discussion of the history of this litigation (Memorandum Opinion at 47-50), I was obliged to point out the flaws in the ODM's Report of Disciplinary Sanctions. I note that Joshua does not deny those flaws--they simply object to my noting them. In my Findings of Fact on the issue of student discipline, I again commented on the OD M's Report of Disciplinary Sanctions, which was prepared for the express purpose of being used by the court in monitoring and evaluating LRSD's compliance with the Revised Plan. In light of that fact, I believe I would have been remiss ifI had not closely scrutinfaed the ODM's Report in deciding whether LRSD had substantially complied with those sections of the Revised Plan dealing with student discipline. Otherwise, what is the role of the Judge? Finally, and perhaps most importantly on this point, none of my Findings of Fact on the issue of whether LRSD substantially complied with its obligations regarding student discipline were based on anything contained in the OD M's Report of Disciplinary Sanctions. Rather, my -5- AO 72A (Rev.8/82 findings simply pointed out that, because the Report failed to develop a proper statistical model for evaluating the data on student discipline, its conclusions were based on pure speculation-making the Report of no use to the court or the parties in evaluating the cause for AfricanAmerican students in LRSD receiving a disproportionate number of suspensions. See Memorandum Opinion at 105-07, ,i,i 24-26. Third, Joshua's counsel take general exception to my discussion of the attorneys' fees that have been paid in this case during the last twenty years and particular exception to my allegedly erroneous finding \"that the Joshua counsel, including the Legal Defense Fund counsel, were paid more than $3,750,000 for their work between 1987 and the present time.\" Substituted Motion for Reconsideration at 3. The amount that Joshua's counsel have been paid, to date, in attorneys ' fees is a matter of public record. As pointed out in footnote 58 of my Memorandum Opinion, these attorneys' fees are as follows: $3,150,000 paid to Joshua's counsel under the 1990 Settlement Agreement;7 $700,000 paid by LRSD to Joshua's counsel for monitoring work performed after December 12, 1990, and before July 1, 1998 (see Exhibit 7 to docket no. 3581 ); and $124,861 paid by LRSD to Joshua's counsel for monitoring work performed under the Revised Plan between July 1, 1998, and January 2001 (see Exhibit 8 to docket no. 3581 ). Thus, based entirely on the evidence in the record, without any need for me to speculate or make assumptions, Joshua's counsel have been paid, to date, $3,974,861 in attorneys' fees--this is more than $3,750,000. In footnote 58 of my Memorandum Opinion, I hazard what I admit to be a \"guess\" that, since 1990, the attorneys ' fees that LRSD, PCS SD, and NLRSD have paid to their own attorneys 7LRSD v. PCSSD, 921 F.2d 1371 , 1390 (8th Cir. 1990). -6- AO 72A - ~(Rev.8/82) \"totals at least $4,000,000.\" Joshua's counsel clearly lack standing to complain about my \"guess\" regarding the aggregate amount of attorneys ' fees paid to counsel for the three school districts--an estimate that LRSD has not challenged. In light of these undisputed facts, I seriously question how Joshua's counsel can make the statement that \"counsel Walker does not accept the court's conclusion that he has directly benefitted from the perpetuation of this case.\" Substituted Motion for Reconsideration at 9. With all due respect to Mr. Walker, I am having a hard time escaping the conclusion that he has been \"directly benefitted\" by receiving millions of dollars in attorneys' fees in this case. Fourth, Joshua's counsel, without citing any supporting facts, accuse me of \"a predisposition which could only have come from previous attitudes regarding the role oflawyers in this long-standing case\";8 \"negative attitudes toward lawyers who are involved with and associated with this case\";9 and \"a bias or hostility toward Joshua's counsel.\"10 Although this should go without saying, I want to remind Joshua's counsel that, while I ruled against them on five of the six arguments they advanced, this does not mean that I harbor any bias against or hostility toward them. 11 For the record, I have no \"predispositions,\" \"negative attitudes,\" or \"bias or hostility\" toward Joshua's counsel. I did indeed express dismay over the attorneys' fees that have been paid to all of the 8Motion for Reconsideration at 2. 9Motion for Reconsideration at 3. 10Motion for Reconsideration at 7. 11\"The Judge must not like me\" is a refrain usually sung by lawyers who have just been called to the bar--when a lawsuit doesn't tum out exactly as they had wanted. Experienced lawyers generally resist the temptation to raise this claim. -7- A072A (Rev.8/82) attorneys in this case--! believe that was a subject that called for comment during my discussion of the long history of this case. Likewise, the concerns I expressed about LRSD's decision to pay Joshua's counsel $700,000 for performing monitoring work for which Judge Wright ruled Joshua's counsel had already been paid ( docket no. 2821) and the $48,333.33 per year that LRSD agreed to pay Joshua's counsel for performing monitoring work under the Revised Plan are directly supported by detailed citations to the record 12--not speculation or conjecture--and also deserved to be mentioned in my review of the history of this case. As I stated in the Memorandum Opinion, counsel for both LRSD an,d Joshua should have done a better job of documenting the reasons for the payment of these attorneys' fees and the precise role of Joshua's counsel in receiving monthly payments from LRSD to monitor its compliance with the Revised Plan. However, in reaching that conclusion, I was guided entirely by the plain facts contained in the record and not by any \"preconceived ideas\" or a \"bias or hostility toward Joshua's counsel.\" Fifth, Joshua argues that: (a) because I discuss the fact that the OD M's staff and budget have more than doubled since its creation, I am implicitly criticizing \"Judge Wright's actions and the Court of Appeals for requiring the creation of the office in the first place\"; 13 (b) I \"may be I signaling that [I] want to end the role of the ODM as that role was established and created by the Eighth Circuit\"; 14 and ( c) I may be trying to infer that \"Joshua take over the roie of ODM with respect to monitoring at a rate of approximately $49,000 per year.\" 15 No one could fairly read the 12See Memorandum Opinion at 33-35 and 38-44. 13Motion for Reconsideration at 6. 14Motion for Reconsideration at 7. 15Motion for Reconsideration at 7. -8- A072A (Rev.8/82) Memorandum Opinion as stating anything within shouting distance of these three farfetched notions. As I repeatedly noted in my Memorandum Opinion, Judge Wright did an outstandingjob of presiding over this case for eleven long years, during which time she faithfully and skillfully decided well over a thousand motions. Nowhere do I implicitly or explicitly direct any criticism toward her. 16 Likewise, my Memorandum Opinion makes it clear that I believe it was a good idea for the Eighth Circuit to create the ODM so that the district court and the Eighth Circuit could ensure \\. that each of the three school districts complied with their many desegregation obligations. Obviously, it is important for the ODM to continue its monitoring work until each of the three school districts is declared to be unitary and released from further supervision by the court. At this point, my only concern is that the ODM operate as frugally and efficiently as possible in going forward with its monitoring of the now much less onerous single remaining compliance issue for LRSD and the desegregation obligations that remain in effect for NLRSD and PCS SD. Finally, Joshua's counsel are absolutely correct that, in my Memorandum Opinion, there \"surely cannot be an inference that Joshua was [to] take over the role of ODM with respect to monitoring at a rate of approximately $49,000 per year ... . \" There is no such \"inference\" or \"implication.\" Sixth, Joshua argues that they should be allowed to present additional evidence ofLRSD' s alleged noncompliance with other sections of the Revised Plan. Substituted Motion for Reconsideration at 10-11. In support of this argument, Joshua alleges that \"the court previously 161 do not understand how counsel can possibly discern (or divine) any such criticism in the Memorandum. -9- AO 72A (Rev.8/82) instructed Joshua not to present any of that evidence [on LRSD's alleged failure to substantially comply with its obligations regarding faculty and staff, student assignment, special education and related programs, parental involvement, and school construction and closing].\" This is not true. It is an after-the-fact assertion. On May 9, 2002, I entered an Order (docket no. 3598) explaining in detail how I intended to proceed in conducting up to five days of hearings on the remaining issues Joshua had raised in their challenge to LRSD's request for unitary status. Four pages of that Order were devoted to discussing what transpired during the December l l., 2001 hearing before Judge Wright, which was held to discuss the remaining grounds for Joshua's challenge to LRSD's substantial compliance with the Revised Plan. Id. at 9-12. The May 9 Order pointed out that, during the December 11 hearing, Joshua's counsel attempted to raise numerous new grounds for challenging LRSD 's alleged noncompliance after they had rested their case on what they viewed as their three strongest grounds--lack of good faith, failure to comply with obligations related to AfricanAmerican achievement, and student discipline. Judge Wright ruled that Joshua could present evidence on three remaining grounds for noncompliance: advanced placement courses; guidance counseling; and extracurricular activities. In addition, she ruled Joshua could present additional evidence of LRSD's alleged lack of good faith, but only to the extent that evidence was related to advanced placement courses, guidance counseling, and extracurricular activities. Judge Wright also made it clear that, after she had heard the evidence on these three remaining areas of alleged noncompliance, she would decide the question of unitary status. Joshua's counsel responded: \"That 's fin e, Your Honor.\" (Docket no. 3597 at 36-37.) Consistent with Judge Wright's ruling during the December 11 , 2001 hearing, the May 9 -10- A072A (Rev.8/82) Order provided that I planned to conduct up to five days of additional hearings on unitary status, during which Joshua would be allowed to present evidence of LRSD's alleged noncompliance with its obligations related to advanced placement courses, guidance counseling, and extracurricular activities. In addition, I allowed Joshua to present noncumulative evidence related to: (a) LRSD's lack of good faith, but only to the extent that it was related to advanced placement courses, guidance counseling, and extracurricular activities; and (b) how LRSD 's alleged failure to comply with its obligations regarding advanced placement, guidance counseling, and extracurricular activities adversely affected the aca~emic achievement of African-American students (docket no. 3598 at 13-14). I hardly see how the May 9 Order could have been any clearer in setting forth the precise ground rules regarding Joshua's three remaining challenges to LRSD's substantial compliance with the Revised Plan. Joshua's counsel raised no objection to the May 9 Order, and, after completing three additional days of evidentiary hearings on July 22-24, 2002, Joshua's counsel rested their case challenging whether LRSD should be declared unitary. Under these circumstances, there is no basis for Joshua's counsel to argue that the court \"instructed\" them not to present evidence ofLRSD 's alleged noncompliance with numerous other provisions of the Revised Plan. Joshua's counsel agreed, flat footedly, to the ground rules for conducting the hearings on unitary status, including the six specific areas of the Revised Plan under which they challenged LRSD's substantial compliance. It is far too late for Joshua to argue that they should be allowed to engage in piecemeal litigation by raising additional grounds for attacking LRSD's substantial compliance with the Revised Plan. Again--one last time--the grounds delineated by Judge Wright and me, and agreed to by all counsel, were fully litigated. -11- AO 72A (Rev.8/82) I do not know how to put it any more plainly than that. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Joshua's Substituted Motion for Reconsideration be and it is hereby DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Joshua's Motion for a New Trial or in the Alternative Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order be and it is hereby DENIED. nf DATED this day // of October, 2002. -12- /)J v_J ~ . ~ L!l UNITED STATES DISTRICTJU~ THIS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET IN COMPLIANCE WITH tULE 58 AND/OR 79(a) FRC ON 10 I 1 / o 2.. BY D ~VI , () AO 72A (Rev.8/82) ECEIVEf OCT 1 2 2002 OFRCE GfSEGREGATtnN ;\\\\'.: lilTGRING EAsrM~l~~gl!2b IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS OCT 1 1 2002 LITTLE ROCK DIVISION JAMES W. Mc By: A K LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. No. 4:82CV00866 WRW/JTR PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KA THERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. ORDER PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTER VEN ORS In a letter dated and delivered to me on October 1, 2002, counsel for Joshua requested that I modify or clarify: ( a) various aspects of the compliance remedy contained in the September 13, 2002 Memorandum Opinion (the \"Memorandum Opinion\") declaring LRSD to be partially unitary; and (b) the role of Joshua and the ODM in performing future monitoring work in this case. Later that day, I entered an Order ( docket no. 3680), stating that I intended to :treat the letter as \"a motion of some kind.\"1 In a letter dated October 9, 2002, counsel for Joshua wrote me a \"supplement\" to their October 1, 2002 letter. Attached to this Order is a copy of the October 9 letter. On October 7, 2002, LRSD filed its Response to Joshua's October 1, 2002 letter (docket no. 3681 ). Because I see no reason to await LRSD's Response to the matters raised in Joshua's 1A copy of the October 1 letter is attached to my Ord~r. A072A (Rev.8/82) October 9 letter, I will proceed to address the merits of the reliefrequested by Joshua's counsel in both of those letters. As a threshold matter, I want to clarify how I view these two letters. On September 24, 2002, Joshua filed a Substituted Motion for Reconsideration (docket no. 3678) requesting that I clarify or modify many aspects of the Memorandum Opinion. Because both of Joshua's letters are seeking reconsideration of still other aspects of the Memorandum Opinion, I will treat those letters as a \"Supplement\" to their Substituted Motion for Reconsideration and address in this Order only those arguments raised in that \"Supplement.\"2 In the future, I think it will be best if all counsel file motions--not letters--raising any issues that they believe require my attention. I should not be copied on general correspondence amongst counsel. First, Joshua's counsel request that I clarify the monitoring obligations the Memorandum Opinion imposed on them with regard to LRSD's compliance with 2.7.1 of the Revised Plan. I shall do so. In 1990, Joshua's counsel made the commitment to participate in a monitoring system to ensure that LRSD, NLRSD, and PCS SD complied with their desegregation obligations under the 1990 Settlement Agreement. See Memorandum Opinion at 34. Later, in approving that Settlement Agreement, the Eighth Circuit recognized that counsel for Joshua were \"the best  defenders and guardians of the interests of their own clients.\" LRSD v. PCSSD, 921 F.2d 1371, 1386 (8th Cir. 1990). Between 1990 and 1998, Joshua's counsel participated in monitoring 2In a companion Order that I am entering contemporaneously with this Order, I have addressed and rejected the arguments raised by Joshua in their Substituted Motion for Reconsideration. -2- A072A (Rev.8/82) LRSD's compliance with the 1990 Settlement Agreement and the 1992 Desegregation Plan.3 After Joshua and LRSD implemented the Revised Plan in 1998, Joshua's counsel entered into an agreement with LRSD to monitor its compliance with the Revised Plan, a task for which LRSD agreed to pay Joshua's counsel $48,333.33 per year.4 Thus, for the last twelve years, Joshua's counsel have been involved with monitoring LRSD's compliance with its desegregation obligations . . In Section VII.A., B., and C. of the Memorandum Opinion, I outlined the Compliance Remedy LRSD must implement in order to comply with its remaining obligations under  2. 7. l of the Revised Plan. Because I believe that Joshua's counsel have an ethical obligation and professional duty to monitor LRSD's compliance with its obligations under  2. 7. l , I provided a monitoring role for them in Section VII.D of the Memorandum Opinion. I intended for Joshua's counsel to continue to perform their monitoring role according to the same procedure they and LRSD have followed for many years in this case. One could read the October 1, 2002 letter as suggesting that Joshua's counsel only intend to continue to monitor LRSD's compliance with 2.7.1 of the Revised Plan if they are ordered to do so by me. I do not believe I can force Joshua's counsel to perform monitoring duties--something that I may have mistakenly assumed they wanted to continue to do. I will leave it up to Joshua's counsel to decide if they have an ethical duty and professional obligation to 3Judge Wright ruled Joshua's counsel were not entitled to receive attorney's fees for any monitoring work performed after the Eighth Circuit's approval of the 1990 Settlement Agreement (docket no. 2821). While that ruling was on appeal to the Eighth Circuit, LRSD voluntarily agreed to pay Joshua's counsel $700,000 forperformingthatmonitoringwork. See Memorandum Opinion at 33-35 and 38-44. 4See Memorandum Opinion at 42. -3- AO 72A (Rev.8/82) continue monitoring LRSD's compliance with its sole remaining obligation under the Revised Plan. I hope Joshua's counsel resolve that question in favor of continuing their long-standing commitment to monitoring LRSD's compliance with its desegregation obligations. However, since they complain about my expressly directing them to continue monitoring LRSD's compliance with  2. 7 .1 of the Revised Plan--something I never expected to hear--I believe I must now modify Section VII.D. of the Memorandum Opinion to read as follows: Joshua may monitor LRSD 's compliance with  2. 7 .1 and, if they choose to do so, they should bring to the attention of LRSD, on a timely basis, all problems that are detected in its compliance with its obligations under  2.7.1, as those obligations are spelled out in this Complianc'f: Remedy. Thereafter, Joshua and LRSD must use the \"process for raising corripliance issues\" set forth in  8.2, et seq., of the Revised Plan to attempt to resolve those compliance issues. If those efforts are unsuccessful, Joshua shall present the issues to me for resolution, as required by  8.2.5. Any such presentation must be timely. Regardless of whether Joshua's counsel continue to monitor LRSD's compliance with  2. 7 .1, the ODM staff most certainly will continue their close monitoring ofLRSD 's compliance with that section of the Revi_sed Plan. I have every confidence that the staff of the ODM will carefully monitor LRSD's implementation of the Compliance Remedy I have ordered under 2.7.1 of the Revised Plan. If Joshua's counsel decide to continue with their monitoring role, which is independent from the monitoring work performed by the ODM, the preceding paragraphs of this Order make it clear that I expect them to follow the same monitoring practices they have followed for years in this case. I expect counsel for Joshua and LRSD to cooperate and work together to ensure that things go smoothly with regard to monitoring LRSD's implementation of its obligations under  2. 7 .1. However, if actual disputes arise regarding monitoring, I will be available to resolve them. -4- A072A (Aev.8/82) Second, Joshua's counsel makes an unsupportable and speculative statement that certain unspecified\"comments\" in the Memorandum Opinion \"indicated that [I] do not foresee orrequire a continued responsibility for monitoring of the intensity which the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit required.\" This assertion simply is not true. I will expect and require the ODM staff to work hard every day to ensure that all three school districts fully comply with all of their remaining desegregation obligations. Of course, for LRSD, these obligations are now far less onerous than they have been in the past. Likewise, NLRSD has already been declared unitary with regard to several ofits original desegregation obligations. In other words, while I will expect ' and require the ODM staff to diligently and fully discharge their obligation to monitor the three school districts, the reality is they now have far fewer obligations. Finally, in Joshua's counsel's October 9, 2002 letter, they request that I conduct a hearing to clarify the role of the ODM. I find there is no need for any requested clarification of the role of the ODM--much less for a hearing on that subject. I feature myself capable of directing the ODM staff in performing their ongoing duties as monitors. IfI waiver in this belief, I may, at that time, call on counsel for suggestions. Of course, if Joshua's counsel determines that the ODM staff is not adequately discharging its monitoring duties, I would expect them to immediately file an appropriate motion. In closing, let me repeat the comment I made in my companion Order addressing the merits of the arguments made by Joshua in their Substituted Motion for Reconsideration: \"I have given this case my best shot, and, if counsel for Joshua or LRSD believe that I have erred, they should appeal my decision to the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.\" No more paper should -5- A072A (Rev.8/82) be wasted in asking me to reconsider aspects of my September 13 Memorandum Opinion or to clarify roles or responsibilities associated with the Compliance Remedy. That's myrulin'. If any party perceives error, that party should get its best hold and go to the Eighth Circuit. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Joshua's Supplement to their Substituted Motion for Reconsideration be and it is hereby DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Section VI.D. of the Memorandum Opinion is modified to read as set forth, supra, at 4. TM DATED this day / ( of October, 2002. THIS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET IN COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 58 AND/OR 7~ ON IO '\" l Q-Z... gy_j-\"\"'-=;~,,,__,_~- -6- JOHNW. WALKER SHAWN CHILDS Honorable William R.Wilson United States District Judge 600 W. Capitol Suite 149 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Re: LRSD v. PCSSD Dear Judge Wilson: JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. ATTORNEY AT LAw 1723 l3RaADWAY Lrrru: RoCK, .Aluw.SAS 7.2206 TELEPHONE (501) 374-3758 FAX (501) 374-4187 Via Facsimile: 604-SJ 49 October 9, 2002 0FCOtlNsEL ROBERT M~,'!..~ DONNAJ.M=r 8210 liENi\u0026gt;KRSON Ra.\\n Ll'rrl.P. Ro~ AIKANSAs 72210 PHONE: (501) 872-8426  FAX (501) 372-8428 EMAn.: mcliemyd@s1rbell.net Tiris is a supplement to my letter motion of October 1,2002. I appreciate the Court treating it as a motion, although I did not so couch it, and I believe that the appropriate action taken by the Court in inviting the parties to react will be most useful. I believe that it is important for me to specify, however, what Joshua believes it would be appropriate for the Court to do with respect to clarifying the monitoring role of the Office of Desegregation Monitoring. I am therefore asking that the Court conduct a hearing: (a) to identify the instructions received by the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (later referred as the ODM) regarding monitoring and reporting in reference to the LRSD's Motion for Unitary Status; (b) to consider whether the instructions received by the ODM were consistent with the earlier identification of ODM' s role as set forth by the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit; and ( c) to identify with greater particularity ODM' s monitoring and reporting role regarding the three school districts, If the Court is inclined to have me formalize my October 1, 2002 letter and today's letter in motion fonn, I will be happy to do so. I am also writing to observe that the Joshua Intervenors filed a Motion for Reconsideration within the time allowed by law and that there has no response filed by either party within the rule time to our motion. Local Rule 7.2(b) requires that any party opposing our motion shall file such motion within eleven days. By my count, any opposing party should have filed its opposition not later than October 4, 2002. Today is obviously October 9, 2002. I am not aware that the Court has a received a Motion to Extend the Time and I have not had a request from any counsel regarding an extension of such time. Page Two October 9, 2002 Accordmgly, we request that the Court role on the motion. JWW:lp cc: All Counsel of Record Ms. Ann Marshall Brown .!!.trorne\"J at Law 17:Z3 Broadwcy Ltrrle Rod; A:rkar..s:::s 72206 Telephone (501) 374-3758 .F'zc (501) 37-! '.1187 Fil TR..4.J.~SlV1ISSION COv'JER SERET p A ...:!.. 0 ..c:-1 . Date: [ To: [ Fa..\"C: l _..... .,3.c;.....c..-7 .f.. .-.o ~L-..::cJV;___ ____,7 Re: ,. ' Sender: [_= =~===l)==========; YOU SHOu'LD RECElr'\"E [_ __ (including cover sheer)} PA.GE(S), INCLUDING l'EJS COVER. S,~'f.T IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES, PLEA.SE CALL \"\u0026lt;(50]) 374-3758\u0026gt;n T.he information comaineci. :in this fu:!:im:ile m~sage is attorney privilegea and couficientfal infomiation mrended only for tb.e use of 'die indivirlulll or en.tit\u0026lt;/ nllm.ed. above. Ii tile re:icier of mis mem1ge is il.Ot the intended reci:pienr, or me employee or agenr res-pons,\"bie to de!.iver re to the intended. recipient, you sre b.ereoy aoti:iied ilim any disse::nination. di.'1ri\"ouiion or copying of cllis commuuicarion is .rtricrly prohibited. If you b.ave received. this c.onmumic:ition in c!l:IOr. p1C3.!e immedi.\u0026amp;e notify us by telephone. md = cb.e ongmal message .a l.l.'l at tile above address via rb.e U.S. Post.l.l Sc:~iice. Ti:um.k you. RECEIVED OCT 1 6 2002 OFACE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DMSION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. CASE NO. 4:82CV00866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NIRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. THE JOSHUA INTERVENORS' MOTION FOR RELIEF CONCERNING THE ODM BUDGET DEFENDANT INTER VEN ORS INTER VENO RS The Joshua Intervenors respectfully move for the entry of an order for the parties' participation in the establishment of the budget for the Office of Desegregation Monitoring, in accordance with the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District No. 1, 971 F 2d. 160, 166 (8th Cir. 1992). This motion is based upon the following allegations and the accompanying memorandum. 1. It has come to the attention of the Joshua Intervenors that this court is in the process of reducing the ODM staff and budget. A member of the ODM staff affected by staff and budget reductions planned by the court has contacted counsel for these intervenors with regard to her legal rights. 2. In LRSD v. PCSSD, supra, the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit articulated the 1 rights of the parties with regard to the establishment fo the ODM budget. To this point, it appears that the court plans to make reductions in the ODM budget and staff without affording the parties the opportunity for participation in the budget-setting process, identified by the Court of Appeals. 3. The Joshua Intervenors concern about this matted~ magnified by the virtual non-use of ODM in the process of determining whether the LRSD had attained unitary status. That is, the court's lengthy opinion is silent on the question of the court's requesting ODM to report on any particular aspect of LRSD' s compliance with the Revised Plan, evidencing that no such request was made. 4. Appeal of the court's merits decision is likely. Any contemplated change in ODM's staffing level should take account of the fact that the Court of Appeals will have the final word - (absent Supreme Court review) on the scope of the LRSD's remaining plan obligations. 5. Alternatively, ODM' s staffing and budget should not be such that it is unable, in the future, to monitor the three districts ' compliance with remaining plan obligations in the manner contemplated by the Court of Appeals. Wherefore, the Joshua Intervenors respeqtfully pray that the court: a. provide the parties access to documents exchanged between ODM and this court concerning ODM staffing and the ODM budget (in th past and in the future): and b. permit the parties to promptly review, analyze, question, and make recommendations concerning or objections regarding the ODM budget and elements thereof, prior to their implementation. Respectfully submitted, 2 /', /) / 1 I ,I I ,  Ro 22 Locust A venue Lexington, MA 02421 781-862-1955 Mass. 405900 ohn W. Walker ~ John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 501-374-3758 AR 64046 . - . CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 3 RECEIVED OCT 1 6 2002 OFACE OF OCT :  DESEGREGATION MONITORING JAM Es 'J1J fi,_ r- r , ~ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT \u0026amp;'!JllT_  f. ~-A\u0026lt; EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS -- WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. CASE NO. 4:82CV00866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT ~S. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. DEFENDANT INTER VENO RS INTER VENO RS THE JOSHUA INTERVENORS' MEMORANDUM CONCERNING THE ODM BUDGET The Joshua Intervenors respectfully submit this memorandum in support of their accompanying motion for relief concerning the ODM budget. It has come to the attention of the Joshua Intervenors that this court is apparently in the process of reducing the ODM staff and budget. In a 1992 decision, the Court of Appeals identified the roles of the court and the parties in the establishment of the ODM budget. See Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District No. 1, 971 F 2d. 160, 166 (8th Cir. 1992). The motion seeks to insure that the parties have the opportunity for participation identified by the appellate court. A viable ODM is important to these intervenors because in their counsel's view the ODM was not given by the court the role envisioned by the Court of Appeals in the process for  determining court that the LRSD had attained unitary status in most areas. Intervenors' counsel 1 want to guard against a like result in the future. . ,1/ J ff -4? . IC7Ju L / ) ~ ,,y~/4 Robert Pressman t- 22 Locust A venue Lexington, MA 02421 781-862-1955 Mass. 405900 I I :..- / Respectfully submitted, . . 46 John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 501-374-3758 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I do hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing motion has been to all counsel of record on this r, day of October, 2002. )  ,- / / ,-) ( ./ J26 7 : /_,,,/ \u0026lt;\"// / -1 :./ c)---r. '-1 - 1  /, r ,1 ,J\\ 'l,/.v,__(,'f 1 1-v ,: __,,, 2 RECEIVED OCT 1 7 2002 OFACEOF DESEGREGATION MONITORING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT vs. 4:82CV00866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. MRS. LOREN JOSHUA, et al. KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al. ORDER OCT '1 C 2002 JAMES \\'I'. L'i -=RK Qy: ___ -\"t.L--=ll'~.\u0026amp;..\u0026lt;;::;:,...,..,.~~ Defendants Intervenors Intervenors Joshua Intervenors have filed a pleading entitled \"The Joshua Intervenors' Motion for Relief Concerning the ODM Budget.\" Paragraph 4 of this pleading reflects that, \"(a)ppeal of the court's merits decision is likely.\" If an appeal is to be taken, Joshua's motion is considerably premature. Following the procedure used in the past in this case (and Eighth Circuit directives), once a proposed budget is submitted by the ODM, I will enter an Order attaching a copy of the proposed budget and will provide all parties an opportunity to file objections or comments. ! To my knowledge, no proposed budget has yet been submitted, and; if an appeal is taken, it is unlikely that there will be any significant changes in the budget until the appeal is decided. Accordingly, because Joshua's motion is premature, it is denied, without prejudice. rfl IT IS SO ORDERED this 11_ day of October, 2002. THIS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET IN COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 58 AND/OR~(~ ON\\o \\ l~ 10 2..- 8YJ\u0026gt;.1~~~-;;_=.....- U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE { .,, 6 8 8 RECEIVED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OCT 2 1 2002 EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS OFACE OF WESTERN DIVISION DESEGREGATION MONITORING LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. NO. 4:82CV00866WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL  DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS PCSSD MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE PCSSD for its motion, states: 1. Plan 2000 requires that: \"An elementary school, located around 145th Street and a middle school or junior high school in the Crystal Hill/Maumelle area will be built.\" 2. The PCSSD proposes to acquire a site located at Carnahan and Murphy Drives in Maumelle, Arkansas and to construct its new middle school there. 3. The PCSSD proposes to build a school with a capacity of 1,000 students and to reserve 200 seats for M to M students. 4. The history of the site selection process, statistical projections concerning racial balance and other pertinent information is set forth in the accompanying memorandum. WHEREFORE, PCSSD prays that its motion be granted and for all proper relief. 373871-v1 Respectfully submitted, WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS LLP 200 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3699 (501) 371-0808 FAX: (501) 376-9442 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On October 22, 2002, a copy of the foregoing was served via U.S. mail on each of the following: Mr. John W. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 2000 Regions Center 400 West Capitol Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Ms. Ann Brown Marshall ODM One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 373871-v1 2 Mr. Dennis R. Hansen Arkansas Attorney General's Office 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell Law Firm P.O. Box 17388 Little Rock, Arkansas 72222-7388 RECEIVED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OCT 2,i 2002 EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS OFACE OF WESTERN DIVISION DESEGREGATION MONITORING LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. NO. 4:82CV00866WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PCSSD MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE Plan 2000 Plan 2000 requires that: \"An elementary school, located around 145th Street and a middle school or junior high school in the Crystal Hill/Maumelle area will be built.\" This Court approved a district-wide conversion to middle schools on June 4, 2001. Accordingly, this request is specifically to build a middle school to be located at Carnahan and Murphy Drives, Maumelle, Arkansas. A Brief History 1. Pine Forest Elementary School remains the only PCSSD school within the city limits of Maumelle. Pine Forest Elementary School was built in 1980. The present capacity of the school as used this year is 556 .. Maumelle was incorporated in 1985 with a population of 4,359. Today, the population of Maumelle is approximately 10,557. 369448-v1 2. Since its inception as a town in the 1960s, junior and senior high students from Maumelle have all been bused to Oak Grove Junior-Senior High School. As noted in previous filings with this Court, the PCSSD desires to convert Oak Grove into a 9-12 high school and to construct a 6-8 middle school to substitute for the current Oak Grove Junior High School. 3. Currently, Pine Forest Elementary, which would jettison its sixth grade under this proposal, can accommodate only 63% of K-6 children residing in Maumelle. The remainder are currently bused to either Crystal Hill Elementary or Oak Grove Elementary. Under this proposal, both Crystal Hill and Oak Grove Elementary would become K-5 schools. 4. To accommodate current M to M sixth graders at Crystal Hill and to otherwise help realize a fully intergraded middle school, the PCSSD would reserve 200 seats at the new middle school for M to M students. 5. The PCSSD Board of Directors voted 6 to Oto seek approval for a school located within Maumelle at their meeting held on November 13, 2001. Advantages of a Maumelle Site 6. The proposed school will allow the PCSSD to move toward completing its conversion to the middle school system and will relieve over-crowding at the landlocked Oak Grove Campus. 7. The proposed school will allow the PCSSD to establish a middle school with an interdistrict feature offering more choices and grade levels particularly for those LRSD students who currently attend Crystal Hill Elementary. 369448-v1 2 8. The PCSSD proposes to construct the school with a capacity of'1,000 students providing room not only for the 200 seats reserved for M to M students 1, but also space for students who can be attracted from the local charter school, area private schools and children who are currently being home-schooled. 9. The PCSSD proposes to begin construction by April 1 of 2003 so that the new facility can be open for education by August of 2004. The PCSSD requests approval of this motion as early as reasonably possible so that sites specific work can be completed prior to the April 1, 2003 commencement of construction. 10. The PCSSD proposes to pay for the acquisition and the construction of the school by re-financing existing debt as approved by the voters on September 17, 2002. The Site Selection Process 11. On January 17, 2002, Dr. Henderson, then Assistant Superintendent for Support Services and now Interim Superintendent, addressed approximately 150 parents at the Pine Forest PTA meeting regarding the progress toward selecting a site for a new middle school. Five different proposed sites were highlighted. 12. On February 4, 2002, Dr. Henderson addressed the Crystal Hill Elementary PTA meeting. Again, approximately 150 parents were in attendance and the same five proposed sites were reviewed with them. 13. Dr. Henderson addressed the Oak Grove Elementary PTA meeting on March 5, 2002. Approximately 90 parents were in attendance. On this occasion, seven 1 By agreeing to this reservation, the PCSSD is assuming that M to M funding as currently configured and provided will remain in effect for the foreseeable future. If such funding is reduced or eliminated in the future, the continued reservation of such seats would likely prove impossible. 369448-v1 3 proposed sites were described. 14. By letter dated March 13, 2002, Dr. Henderson invited the Joshua lntervenors to serve on the Site Selection Committee. By letter dated March 15, 2002, Mr. John Walker, on behalf of Joshua, declined the invitation to participate. 15. By memo dated March 19, 2002, the Pulaski Association of Classroom Teachers nominated Diane Jones to serve on the Site Selection Committee, as a Knight intervenor. 16. By memo dated March 14, 2002, the principal of Crystal Hill Elementary School forwarded the names of four parents who desired to serve as members of the Site Selection Committee. One of those is a parent of an M to M student attending Crystal Hill. Oak Grove and Pine Forest Elementary Schools provided a bi-racial list of committee members by telephone. 17. A preliminary meeting of the Bi-Racial Site Selection Committee, which included representatives of ODM, was held on April 23, 2002, at Pine Forest Elementary School. 18. The second meeting of the Site Selection Committee was held on April 29, 2002, at Crystal Hill Elementary School. As part of this meeting, the Committee physically visited the seven possible sites. 19. As the process continued, some of the sites were deleted for various considerations including costs and lack of availability. 20. A copy of the minutes of the meeting held on April 29, 2002, is attached as Exhibit A. It includes capsule descriptions of each site evaluated including information concerning costs. 369448-v1 4 21. The next meeting was held May 8, 2002, at Oak Grove Elementary School. 22. A revised list of the Site Selection Committee members as of May 1, 2002, is attached as Exhibit B. 23. At the Oak Grove meeting, an initial vote was taken to rank the available sites. A final meeting was held on June 10, 2002, at Pine Forest Elementary School. At the end of the process, the site described in Paragraph 1 of this memorandum was selected by the Committee and approved by the School Board. Statistical Considerations 24. As part of the Court approved process for building Crystal Hill Elementary School, the PCSSD agreed to reserve up to 399 seats at Crystal Hill for transferring LRSD students. The construction of the middle school would eliminate the sixth grade at Crystal Hill. It is appropriate to reserve, at a minimum, that prorata number of seats at the new school for LRSD students. 25. Excluding pre-K, there are seven grades at Crystal Hill including kindergarten. This equates to 14% of the seats. 14% of 399 is 56 seats. 26. This number, however, is not sufficient to reach the long-standing PCSSD goal of a minimum of 20% African American students at every school. Accordingly, the PCSSD proposes to reserve a total of 200 seats for eligible M to M transfers at the new school. This would provide 10% of the African American student body if the school is built to house 1000 students. 27. This number coupled with the African American student population currently residing in the Crystal Hill, Pine Forest and Oak Grove zones will be sufficient 369448-v1 5 to safely populate the new school at at least 20% minority. An examination of the current fourth, fifth and sixth grades at those referenced schools demonstrates this projection. Crystal Hill Pine Forest Oak Grove 4\"' Grade Black Students 4\"' Grade Black Students 4\"' Grade Black Students MtoM Resident Total MtoM Resident Total MtoM Resident Total 51 51 2 9 11 5 9 14 5'\" Grade Black Students 5'\" Grade Black Students 5'\" Grade Black Students MtoM Resident Total MtoM Resident Total MtoM Resident Total 51 51 0 20 20 1 6 7 61 \" Grade Black Students 6'\" Grade Black Students 6'\" Grade Black Students MtoM Resident Total MtoM Resident Total MtoM Resident Total 38 38 3 8 11 4 17 21 140 140 5 37 42 10 32 42 28. To make the projection, one should consider both the M to M students currently attending 41 \\ 5th and 6th grade at these schools, together with the resident African American population in these zones. This totals 224 students. This number, as compared to 1,000 seats, projects a minimum population of over 22% African American at the new middle school. 29. Overall, the latest census figures project 7 40 school children between the ages of 12 and 15 years old will be resident within the city limits of Maumelle by the . - year 2005. (Please see Exhibit C). This, together with the students who will be transferred from the Oak Grove area together with the projected M to M students, dictates sizing the school to accommodate 1,000 students. Staffing 30. There should be no negative affects on current staffing. While the Oak Grove Junior/Senior High will be no more, the new middle school will require similar, if not identical, administrative staffing. 369448-v1 6 31. The same students who are currently taught at the sixth grades at the three elementary schools will simply attend the new middle school. The same students who would be seventh and eighth graders at Oak Grove Junior/Senior High School will simply be attending the new middle school but will require the same number of teachers as the District currently employs at the sixth grade in the elementary schools and at the seventh and eighth grades at Oak Grove. Attendance Areas 32. The \"attendance zone\" for the new middle school will be identical to the current attendance zone for Oak Grove Junior/Senior High School. Accordingly, there will be no need to change any attendance zones. Transportation 33. Currently, all secondary Maumelle students are transported from ', ... Maumelle to Oak Grove for grades seven through twelve. Under this concept, resident Maumelle students would now be allowed to attend grades six, seven and eight in their resident community but would continue to be transported for grades nine through twelve at Oak Grove High School. Those Oak Grove students currently attending Oak Grove Junior High School would be transported to Maumelle for their middle school years. The PCSSD believes that this arrangement generates greater equity for the affected communities as the transportation factor is more equally shared under the new arrangement. 34. M to M students would continue to be transported by choice. That is, since they elect to be M to M students, they are not \"assigned\" to the schools they select. Under this proposal, they would simply have the option to continue in an 369448-v1 7 interdistrict setting that includes the seventh and eighth grades and does not terminate at the sixth grade. WHEREFORE, the PCSSD prays that the Court approve the location of a new middle school located at Carnahan and Murphy Drives, Maumelle, which would reserve 200 seats for M to M transfer students and for all proper relief. 369448-v1 Respectfully submitted, WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS LLP 200 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3699 (501) 371-0808 FAX: (501) 376-9442 By _ ....,...._~--..,..:....;:;=-a.__ _____ _ A nty Special s 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On October 22, 2002, a copy of the foregoing was served via U.S. mail on each of the following: Mr. John W. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 2000 Regions Center 400 West Capitol Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Ms. Ann Brown Marshall ODM One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 369448-v1 9 Mr. Dennis R. Hansen Arkansas Attorney General's Office 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 12201  Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell Law Firm P.O. Box 17388 Little Rock, Arkansas 72222-7388 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Donald J. Henderson, ED.D. Assistant Superintendent DIVISION OF SUPPORT SERVICES 925 East Dixon Road/P.O. Box 8601 Little Rock, Arkansas 72216 (501) 490-2227 Ext. 209 Fax: (501) 490-0483 Minutes of Crystal Hill/Maumelle Area Bi-Racial Selection Committee Meeting April29,2002 Dr. Don Henderson opened the meeting by handing out a_ meeting agenda and a sign-in sheet for attendees to sign. Dr. Henderson provided several handouts to the attendees and discussed each handout as .they were distributed. Comments and questions were made during the handout process. Dr. Henderson introduced Mr. Jim Sharkey, City of Maumelle, who went over the possible sites. Mr. Sharkey had several map displays that helped show the location of the sites. The sites discussed were six sites from the Maumelle area and the site adjacent to Crystal Hill Elementary owned by PCSSD. Sites 1 and 2 are owned by the City of Maumelle and land costs would be $25,000 per acre. If one of these sites is selected the City would provide an access road and utilities to the site. Site 3 is along Maumelle Boulevard north of the Kroger Store. This site originally was 19 acres but due to a recent partial sale the area now available is 12 acres. Additional acreage is available from adjacent property owners so that a 20 plus acre site could be obtained. The owners of these lands would want to do some type of land swap rather than sell the properties. Access and utilities are available to this site. Site 4 is a 19-acre site at intersection of Naylor Drive and North Odom. Asking price is $50,000 per acre. Access and utilities are available to this site. - Site 5 is a 42-acre site north of the Molex Plant. Needed acreage would be available at $1 .00/SF ($43,560 per acre). Access and utilities are available~to 1111 ___ 1111!11_IIII this site. . EXHIBIT I Site 6 is an 18-acre site owned by Baptist Health. Addition acreage is available from adjacent property owners so a 20 plus acre site could be obtained. Price is in the $2.00 to $2.50/SF ($87,120 to $108,900 per acre) range. Access and utilities are available to this site. Site 7 is property owned by PCSSD that is adjacent to Crystal Hill Elementary. Approximately 20 acres of the 30 acres originally purchased for an elementary/middle school site is available for a middle school. The property value in this area is probably in the $3.50 to $5.00/SF ($152,460 to $217,800) range. This site could be used in a land swap if needed. Following Mr. Sharkey's presentation a field trip via PCSSD school bus was made to visit each of the possible sites. The field trip concluded at approximately 8:00 PM. Next meeting of committee will be at Oak Grove Elementary on Wednesday, May 8, 2002 at 5:30 PM.  Revised 05/01/02 CRYSTAL HILUMAUMELLE AREA MIDDLE SCHOOL SITE SELECTION COMMITTEE COMMITTEE MEMBER Terri Ayers ( j. ; 12 Mine Hill ; I No. Little Rock, AR 72118 758-2861 / Russell Laster 24 Hogan Drive Maumelle, AR 72113 851-2151 j Ms. LaBrenda Cohens 1 \u0026lt;1j ').. ?- 7-022 Marche Lateral Road No. Little Rock, AR 72118 851-1717 Mr. Anthony Gross ~,- ., 10711 Mundo Road No. Little Rock, AR 72118 r t \u0026gt;.- Ms. Diane Jones _,} r  123 Ridgeland Drive  Maumelle, AR 72113 851-8188 / M s. P am Skile s ..f,. . :,.. i ,,. \".I  ': .;_ 13 Havenwood Lane 1\\ 1 Maumelle, AR 72113 753-7653 / Ms. Pam Roberts 117 Carnahan, Suite 3 : .1. :.  {:'j : i.__:,tJJ :,..., Maumelle, AR 72113 851-9300 ,11'1s. Essie Coffee .i'. 1),/ 13916 Old Maumelle Rd. Maumelle, AR 72113 851-2696 I ,. ! v'Walter Pace , l-s( i'-,  25023 Highway 365, North Maumelle, AR 72113 851-1388 :. : . \\ ~ .. ~\\ ~ REPRESENTING Crystal Hill Elementary Parent Crystal Hill Elementary Parent Oak Grove Elementary Parent Oak Grove Elementary Parent Knight Intervenors Community Person PCSSD School Board Member District Bi-Racial Committee District Bi-Racial Committee I EXHIBIT /3 -/4s. Mary Scruggs 8 Hickory Place Maumelle, AR 72113 851-8450 -l -.. .. - vl\\1r. Brent Lowrey J. :;.!' . '. (t\\.; 14505 Berberich No. Little Rock, AR 72118 803-4456 . /4r. and Mrs. Reggie Davis _  4 Holly Brook Cove :,_.\\ ';\\) I 1 Maumelle, AR 72113 851-2177 , Mrs. Nancy Foster 12 Barber Drive Maumelle, AR 72113 851-8708 / 1-Mrs. Shenel Sandidge '.  : . _ ,, 17 Pin Oak Loop (_., . Maumelle, AR 72113 \\ (_.-, :,; if_, ,. f:, ~..l 57(H) 682-7893(W) Mrs. Carol Worley 12 Stoneledge Drive i . } \\ ( . Maumelle, AR 72113 'r'.\\ r: : , , . J 851-8208 (H) ~2.1'.\"~.5~5 (W) v1'1rs . Melissa Guldin Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza r: ,, t ! 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 , :\\\\ : \\ Little Rock, AR 72201 376-6200 / Mr. Horace Smith Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza ('.  i : 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 376-6200 .)Mr. Richard Crider 26 Sugarloaf Loop Maumele, AR 72113 851-8846 . . .... -   ..  --  --~--- --- ......... . Oak Grove Elementary Parent , Oak Grove Elementary Parent :,u' Pine Forest Elementary Parent Pine Forest Elementary Parent Pine Forest Elementary Parent Office of Desegregation Office of Desegregation Crystal Hill Elementary Parent . ( . I ~ 's. Barbara Means '.: __ l.~ / M ... 1J, tI; t ,.;-,L. .. ~_r j \"J tv'~ ,'\\\\\": _. 13500 Ridgehaven Road G ; . \\( U i C ..-r \u0026lt; ,.\\ Little Rock, AR 72211 223-8477 Dr. Donald J. Henderson. 925 East Dixon Road Little Rock, AR 72206 490-6209 Dr. Martha Johnson 925 East Dixon Road Little Rock, AR 72206 490-6205 Mr. Jim Sharkey, CCD Director Community and Economic Development 550 Edgewood Drive, .Suite 590 Maumelle, AR 72113 Mr. Junius Babb Assistant Superintendent Little Rock School District 501 Sherman Street Little Rock, AR 72202 Mr. Bobby Acklin North Little Rock School District 2700 North Poplar Street North Little Rock, AR 72114 Crystal Hill Elementary Paren,t PCSSD Assistant Superintendent PCSSD Director of Equity ., . c~;s~s~,ta-_f~ ;r -\u0026lt; . -~ . Pulaski County Special School District . Pro:pQsed)\\fi:dd'}e S~bool ,.  According to the 2000 U.S. Census, 1,984 children between the ages .of 5 to 17 years old reside within-the City of Maumelle . . The average annual growth rate for.this age group w~ 4%, between the y.eatS 1990 and 2000. Based on:this continued average rate of growth, the City of Maumelle should have . approximately 2; 146 children in the-year 2002 and 2, 4l4 children in the: y~ar-2005. According to the 2000 U.S. -Census, 591 children between the ages of 12 to 15 years old . reside within the-City of Maumelle. The average annual growth rate for this age group was 4. 6%, between the years 1990 and 2000. Based on this continued average rate of growth, the City of Maumelle should have  approximately 646 children in the year 2002 and 740 children in the year 2005. According to the 2000 U.S. Census, 431 children between the ages of 13 to 15 years old reside within the City of Maumelle. Unfortunately, the U.S. Census did not obtain data on 12 to 13 year old children. Source: Mr. Jerry L. Bell Assistant Research Specialist Census State Data Center UALR Institute for Economic Avancement Tel: 501-569-8538 EXHIBIT I ~ RECEIVED C lr-D \\f- li--..J\"l'ff OCT 2 9 2002 OFACEOF DESEGREGATION MONITORING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERJ.'-J DIVISION U s OISlRICT ~~SAS EASTE.RN DISTRICT oc, 2 5 2002 JAMES W. McCORMACK, CLER~ B'f.- OE.P CLE.RK LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. NO. 4:82CV00866 WRW/JTR PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.I, ET AL DEFENDANTS INTER VEN ORS INTER VEN ORS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL MOTION FOR HEARING REGARDING RELEVANCE OF 28 U.S.C. 455 TO THE PRESENT PROCEEDINGS The Joshua Intervenors respectfully move the Court to set a hearing for the purpose of determining whether 28 U.S.C. 455 has any relevance to the present proceedings. The Joshua Intervenors respectfully submit that 28 U.S .C. 455 states: (a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate [magistrate judge J of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questions. (b) He shall also disqualify hi\"mself in the follovving circumstances: (]) Where he has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding; (2) Where in private practice he served as lawyer in the matter in controversy, or a lawyer with whom he previously practiced law served during such association as a lawyer concerning the matter, or the judg eor such lawyer has been a material witness concerning it; (3) Where he has served in governmental employment and in such capacity participated as counsel, adviser or material witness concerning the proceeding or -1- expressed an opinion concerning the merits of the particular case in controversy; (d) For the purpose of this section the following words or phrases shallhave the meaning indicated: (1) \"proceeding\" includes pretrial, trial, appellate review, or other stages of litigation; In reference to 28 U.S .C. 455(b)(2), the Comt is required to disqualify itself\"where in private practice he served as a lawyer in the matter in controversy ... \" Undersigned counsel are informed that the Honorable District Court, while in private practice, appeared in 833 F.2d 113 (8th Cir. 1987) in re: Little Rock School District vs. Pulaski Countv Special School District, No. 1., Nos. 87-2150 and 87-2363, before the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. The cited Opinion addressed the issue of whether Judge Henry Woods should be disqualified. The disqualification - issues had been raised by several of the parties including, notably, the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. See attached Opinion, Exhibit A. The Court of Appeals determined \"that errors of procedure took place but we do not agree that it is reasonable to infer partiality or bias on the part the able and experienced district judge.\" The Court of Appeals apparently upheld the arguments of his honor which were made while His Honor was in private practice. The Court of Appeals did not explain its reasons in that Opinion but did so in 839 F.2d 1296, 1299. The disqualification issues, which were presented by His Honor while in private practice, were addressed in a lengthy Opinion on pages 1301, 1302 and 1303. The Court of Appeals, in that same Opinion, also addressed many of the issues which are raised or could have been raised in the present proceedings including compensatory programs in the LRSD, 839 F.2d 1306, magnet schools, 839 F.2d 1309, and teacher assignments in LRSD, 839 F.2d 1296. -2- The Court , in writing its Opinion dated September 13, 2002, included virtually all the citations from the Court of Appeals (see Exhibit B) hereto but did not refer to, mention or address these two impo1iant Opinions in which the Collli, participated as a trial attorney in private practice. Plaintiff's counsel have sought to obtain the briefs which were filed with respect to Nos. 87-2150 and 87-2363 by His Honor, while in private practice, and any other briefs or activity which address that subject and have been unable to do so in a timely fashion. Their own records are incomplete regarding those filings . Request has been made of the Clerk of the Court of Appeals, however, to retrieve such briefs of all the parties regarding the two cited cases and are informed by the Clerk of that Court that he will retrieve the file. See Exhibit C. The Joshua Intervenors request that the Court convene an evidentiary hearing for the purpose of exploring the role the Court had, if any, while in private practice with respect to the subject case. - In this respect, counsel having just learned this information, also notes that the Court has employed as a law clerk of the Court's staff one of the original lawyers who filed the instant case, Ms. Janet Pulliam. Counsel also note that at least one of Joshua counsel is a friend of Ms. Pulliam. Ms. Pulliam and her associates, however, are listed as counsel of record in at least these appellate citations; 778 F.2d 404, 407; and 959 F.2d 716. She was in association with Phil Kaplan and other counsel in833 F.2d 112 where Mr. Kaplan's name appears before the Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr. and she was in association with Mr. Kaplan in 839 F.2d 1296. This is confirmed by the fee application of counsel for the LRSD which went to the Comi of Appeals in 1992. See Exhibit D. The Joshua Intervenors believe that 28 US.C. 455 issues are raised which should be developed at a hearing. Counsel are not moving for the Court to recuse at this time; however they would like to have an opportunity to review the proceedings that are set fo1ih above and any other ,., - .) - writings to which the Court was privy, while in private practice, between himself and his client, Judge Woods. In that way, the Com1 and the pai1ies would be in a better position to address the applicability of 28 U.S.C. 455. FURTHERMORE, the Joshua Intervenors respectfully further pray that at such heaiing the Court 1) inform counsel whether the present assignment of this case to this Court considered His _Honor's earlier role in the case while in private practice, in the light of28 U.S.C. 455(b)(2); 2) the basis for the Com1's conclusion that it did not have a duty to recuse pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 455 (b )(2); and 3) request that the Court, if possible, make available to counsel copies of all briefs which His Honor has filed in this case while in private practice. '; 7 / ,. ./ , I / I .  I, . I  //\\ /--J';,( -~-+ ,/_ ~ '-c,'2-r,.;,f,-/'Lu:..._;, Robert Pressman, Mass Bar No. 40960 22 Locust A venue Lexington, MA 02421 (781) 862-1955 Respectfully submitted, Jo n W. Walker, AR Bai No. 64046 JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 (50 l) 374-3 758 (501) 374-4187 (Fax) Rickey Hick1\u0026lt;_9{ Bar No. 89235 -. Attorney at L-a:w Evergreen Place 1100 North University, Suite 240 Little Rock, Arkansas 72207 (501) 663-9900 -4- \\ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing: hqf been serzs:9- fl -~ ,,,and U.S. Mail, postage prepaid to the following counsel of record, on this i-5 , l\\_day of cfl-. '/?-\u0026amp;..., 2002: Mr. Christopher Heller FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 400 W. Capitol, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Ms. Ann Brown Marshall ODM One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Building 200 West Capitol Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 -5- Mr. Dennis R. Hansen Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rocle Arkansas 72201 Ivlr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 425 W. Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3472 Mr. Richard Roachell ROACHELL LAW FIRM 11800 Pleasant Ridge Road, Suite 146 Post Office Box 17388 Little Rock, Arkansas 72222-7388 3 833 FIWERAL llEI'ORTEU, 2d SE!t!ES In 1e LJ'l\"J'LI~ HOCK SCHOOi, lllS'!'lllC'r, Petilloncr. LITTLE HOCK SCIIOOL DIS'fJtl C:r, Appellant, V. PUl,ASIU COUNTY SPECIAi, SCHOOi, DlS'l'Rl\u0026lt;.:I' NO. I, Appcllcc. Nos. 87-2150, 87-2303. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth CircuiL Submitted Nov. 3, 1987. Deciclcd Nov. 6, 1U87. Supplemental Opinion Filed l'eb. 9, 1988. l.,iligalion was hroughl involving election for school board positions. The Uniled States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Henry Woods, J., direct,. ed elections for three school board positions and nppenl was filed and petition for writ of mandate was filed asking for disqualification of district coutt judge. The Court of Appeals, Arnold, Circuil .Judge, held Lhnt: (1) fact Lhat lawyer wilh whom trial judge once practiced npp\"ared at one time in nnolher case consolidated with pending cnse did not require district court judge's disqualification, and (2) enors of procedure in p1oceeding did not give rise lo reasonable inference of parLialily or bias so as to require disqualiricalion of district courL judge. Ordered accordingly. J. Judges e,,45 Fact that lawyer with whom district court judge once practiced appeared at one lime for amicus curiae in case consolidated with and Inter severed from pending case did not warrant disquali(icalion of district court judge; consolidated case was closed case, or at most, dormant, when it was consolidated and such fleeLing and tenuous connection did not require recusal. 28 U.S. C.A.  455(n), (h)(2). l.   Herny Woods, Unile\u0026lt;I Slates Dislrlct 2. Judges \u0026lt;S=-~9(1) Procedural errors which occurred in litigation involving school board election did not give rise to reasonable inference of partiality or hias so as to require disqualification of district court judge. 28 U.S.C.A.  465(a), (b)(2). P.A. Hollingsworth, LiLtle Rock, Ark., for appellant. William R. Wilson, Jr., Little Rocle, Ark., fot Judge Woods in mandamus. Phil Kapla,i, Little Rock, Ark., for Little Rock School Dist.  Sam Perroni, Little RocU, Ark., for Rayburn. Phillip Lyon, Chicago, 111., for North Lit,. tie Rock. Before HEJi NEY, ARNOLD, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges. ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. The two proceedings captioned above, to gether wiLh a number of appeals raising related issues, were argued before us on November 3, 1987, in Little Rock, Arkansas. Two of Lhe many important issues p1esenled deserve immediate answers: (1) Shall the school-board election now scheduled for December 8, 1987, in the Little Rock School District (LRSD), be allowed to lake place? (2) Who shall preside over the District Court! No. 87- 2368 is an appeal by LRSD from Lhe DistricL Court's I order of October 1, 1987, directing that elections for three school-board positions be held on December 8, 1987. This order is affirmed. We find no error of law, abuse of discretion, or clearly erroneous finding of fact in the District Court's order. It is ou, understanding that LRSD is free now to pursue actively the search for a new superintendent, and that it will be free to hire someone right after the elec tion. No. 87-2160 is a petition for writ of mandamus filed by LRSD, asking us to Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. APPLICATlON OF WOOD 113 Cltcns833 F.211 ltJ (SlhClr. 1981) declare that Judge Woods should have dis- The judgment in No. 87-2363 is affirmed qualified himself. In the alternative, it is The petition for writ of mandamus in No. suggested that we simply direct that anoth 87-2160 is denied. We t.lirect lhnt our rnnn er judge be assigned lo this case. ln addi dates in these lwo cases issue forthwiU1 lion to the petition for mandamus, various 1 t is 50 ordere\u0026lt;l. appeals also include suggestions for Lhe disqualification of the trial judge. We are not satisfied that such drastic re1ief is ap propriate. [1] Two main grounds for recusal are urged. First, a lawyer with whom Judgt? Woods once pracLiced appeared at one Lime for an amictis curiae in a case called Cla,t, v. Board of Educ. of the Little Rock School Dist, No. LR-C-64-155. The o;otrict Court first consolidated Cla,k with the instant case, then later severed it and returned it to the docket of another judge. Disqualification is sought under 28 U.S.C.  455(b)(2), which requires disqualification \"where in private practice . . a lawyer with whom [the judge] previously prncliced law served during such association as a lawyer concerning the matter.\" We disagree with this argumenl Clark was a closed case, or at most dormant, when it was consolidated with this one, and in any event it has now been severed. We do not think that such a fleeting and tenuous con nection between the present case and the judge's p3rlner's activiLies while in practice years ago, was intended by Congress to require recusal. [21 In addition, Lhe parties seeking disqualification assert that because of certain procedural improprieties the judge's \"impartiality might reasonably be questioned.\" 28 U.S.C.  455(a). We agree that errors of procedure took place, but we do not agree that it is reasonable to infer partiali ty or bias on the part of U,e able and experienced District Judge. He has performed with diligence in circumstances that are anything but easy. We decline to re rnove him from the case.  Another opinion will be filed in due course further explaining our reasons for the conclusions expressed today with re spect to the election and disqualification matters, and addressing as well the other questions raised in these cases. In re Applicalion of Lnny A. WOOD lo Appear Before the Grnnd Jury (Misc. 85-L-02). Appcnl of UN11'ED S'l'A'fl~S of America. No. 86-1719. United SLnl.es Court of Appenls, Eighth Circuit Submilled March 10, 1987. Decided Nov. 12, 1987. Former conspirncy defendant, who w; acquilted, broughL applicalion to mnke inc vidual presentation lo grand jury concer ing allegations of perjury by F'Bl agent. United States ALtorney presented alleg lions lo grand jury, which declined to t.al acLion. Applicant then filed petition alle ing matter had not been fairly present, nnd again requesting permission to nppe before grand jury. The United Slntea D lrict Court, District of Nebraska, Wan, !{. Urbom, J., issued order lo United St.ul Attorney of Disll\"ict to make represen1 lion of matler, or applicant's petition war be granted. The United States appeal\u0026lt; The Court of Appe\u0026gt;tls, Henney, Cir\u0026lt;! Judge, held that (1) District Court's ori was proper exercise of supervisory pow and (2) order did not violate separation powers. Affirmed. f\u0026lt;'agg, CircuiL Judge, dissented w opinion. ~ --  \u0026lt;.\u0026gt; ~- ..) ---:s: -~ l-l{ - 921 F.2d 1371 (1990) 949 F.2d 253 (1991) 56 F.3d 904 (1995) 148 F.3d 956 (1998) 243 F.2d 361 (1957) .369 F.2d 661 (1966) 426 F.2d 1035 (1970) 449 F.2d 493 (1971) 465 F.2d 1044 (1972) 705 F.2d 265 (1983) 778 F.2d 404 (1985) - 971 F.2d 160 (1992) 131 F.Jd 1255 (1997) 83 F.Jd 1013 (1996) 112 F.3d 953 (1997) JOHN W. WALKER SHAWN CHILDS ivlr. j\\,fichael Gans United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Thomas F. Eagleton Court House Room 24.329 111 South 10th Street St. Louis, MO 63102 JOHN vV. 'vVALKER, P.A. A'ITORNEY AT LAW 1723 BROADWAY LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72206 TELEPHONE (501) 374-3758 FA.t'C (501) 374-4187 Vi.a Facsimile - 314-244-2780 October 22, 2002 Re: Case No. 84-1543 Little Rock School District v. Joshua; Case No. 84-1620 Little Rock School District; OF COUNSEL ROBERT JVIcHENRY. P.A. DONNA J. 21-IcHENRY 8210 HENDERSON ROAD W'ITLE ROCK. ARKANSAS i2210 PHONE: (501) 372-3425  FAX (501) 372-3428 EM.ill: mchenryd@swbell.net Case Nos. 87-2150 and 87-2363 - Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School Dear Mr. Gans: Would you kindly search your files and advise whether you have in your archives the briefs of the Appellants and the Appellees regarding the above captioned cases. I am panicularly interested in whether there were briefs filed on behalf of the District Court in the above captioned cases. JWW:js Thank you for your attention to this matter. ~incerely, %9 F'JWBJIJ\\L ItEPOitTJm, 2d SERJES Cl'lTl,E R\u0026lt;JCI( SCHOOL D!STR!CT. Appollant, Aune Milchell; Bob Moore; Pfl.t Gee; Pal Rayburn; Mary .T. Gngej North LiHli Roch CIDs:;room Teachers Associalion; Pula!;Jd Association rJf Clai-~room TeaChP.r~; Litf.le Rock Cl~ssroom 'J.'':!:achers Association; Al~xa Arm slron:;; I{arlos Armsfronr;; Etl Bullinv ton; 1\\h,yyam DcJ.vjs; .Jani1.::e Deni: John Harrison; Alvin 1-J.ndson; Talia Hut.Ison; Milton .Jacksoni Lor\u0026lt;2:ne Jo.~ht1a; Lesl.ie .lo!'lhu;:,.; Stacy .Joshua: Wayne .Joshuai ltatherine f{nighl: Sara Matthews; Ber.it)' Mcl{inney; .Derr iclt Milesi .hrnlCe Miles; .John M. Mi l2s; NAACPi Joyce Person; Brli1n Tnyl01:; Hilton Taylor; Par5l,a 'f~ylor: RfJbert Willingham; 1'011y~ Willi11g. ham, Jnterve11orn, V. PULASIU COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOi, D_18TJ1ICT II I; North Little . Rock School DislrJct; Ll;!:OI\\ B:irues; Sheryl Dunn; Mac Faulhn~ri Ilichanl A. Gid, ding:,; Mari:,.rme Go::;ser; Dl111 Hind man; Shirley Lowery; Bob Lyon: GCorge A. McCrary; Bob l\\lf)rnr.; Stert Morley; Buddy R~ines; D~vid Sain: Hoh Stender; Dole Wnrd; John \\VRrd: Judy Weari Gni.inger Williams, Dcfen- 1lant-::, PhiliJl E. Kapla11; JanP.t PulH::i.mi John Bi.lheilner; F.A. Holling!'iworth, Appel lees. LITTLE llOCK SCl!OOL JJJSTHICT, Appellee, Aune Mitchell; Bob P.-'loore: Pat Gee; Piit R~Jburn; Mary .T. Gage; fforth Lilllr . Roel( Clrtl=i!'il'oorn Teachers /\\ssociation: Pul::u,ld As:mciation or Classroom Teachers; Little Reel\u0026lt; Classroom Te::tchets Assnc.ialion; Alexa J\\_rm!' it.ro11g; I{arlos An11!'itron11; Ed Dul/ingt, 111; l{huyyam Dads; Janice Deni: .Jo h 11 Hnnisun; Alvin Hut.Ison; T:1li.i ; . t: i.,l'l'TLE 1t0CJ{ SCHOOL lHS'l', \" Plll,ASIO \u0026lt;)T\\'. 8CltOOL I . 'i.l'I Cllc :i.c: 959 F.,.d 716 (IUh Cir. 1992) Huclsun: Milton Jackson; .l,ur-?:nc Josh- Sara l\\lnU:llcw:,: H\u0026lt;'cl(J' l\\'lcllin ucJ'; Hcr- 110; Le~lie. Joshua; Slncy Joshun; riclr J\\.li les; .Tn ni (e Mi.lr.:r.; Jo hn M. Wr1y11e Joshua; J(alhninc J.{nighl.; Miles; NAACP; Joy\u0026lt;:~ .Pcnm11: Bthrn Sl\\rn ~fa.Llhews: He.ckr l\\ld{ inuer; Der- Taylor: .lli ll.0 1\\ 'l':t)' lor; Par i:: hn TaJ lor; rick ~mes; Janice ntiles; .Juhn I\\'[. lloherl. \\V illi11 p. lrn 111: 'f'onJ'a Willin rr- ~liles; NAACP; Joyce Persol!; Ddan Imm, lulervcnon;, Tr1rlor; Hilto11 Taylor; Pan; lrn. Tay lor; v .  Robert Willi11ghru11: To11yn Will ing- PUl. ,\\Sl\\l CO\\JN'l'Y sn;c.u1. SCIIOOI, ham, IntervenonJ, PULASl{l COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT # I: North Little !lock School District: L(!on Barnes; Sher.\\'! D111111: J\\lnc Faullrner; Riclrn rd A. GicldingSi Mnria1111c Gosser; Don Himlmnn; Shirley i..fJtrery: Bob L)'OJli George A. l\\kCrory; Bol, Moore; Sl.c,e ~forley; Butld.r Rnines; Dadd Sain: Dab Stender; Dale \\Varel; .J ohn Wnnl; Judy Wear; Grainger Willin111s, De[en don ls, Philip E. J{nphn; .i~t1et Pullia111; .John IJilhcimer: P.A. llo ll i11gsworth, Appe/la11ls. LITJ'LE ROC![ SCHOOL DIS'l'!llCT. Appelhrnt, Anne Milchclli llolJ l\\foore; Pat. Gee; Pnf: Hayburn; l\\fory .J. Gage: Norlh Little flock C.:las~room Tcad1crs Association; Pulos-kt Assor.iation ur Classro(1m Tenchers; J ,iltle Rock Cla~sroont . Teo.chers J\\.ssodalion; Alcxn Arm-strong; Rarlos Annslro11g; Ed B11fli11r.lo11; l(hayyfuu J.)avi!';; Janice Hcnl.: John Harrison; Aldn Ilml.c;on; 'l'alin Hudson: Milton .fncksoni .Lorc11e .Jo~h. ua; Leslie .Joshua; Sl0;cy J o~ lrn :i; Wa_rne .Jo~lni:i.; !{nllt!!dne JC11 ig-llt.i IJISTl l l CT ff .l: North l,lltlc H.oclt fk hoo l Hist.rid: Leon JJ:in1 1~!;i Sher.1'1 1J111111; .t\\:lnc Ji'1111 llmer; lticJrnnl A. n it1- di 11 r,s; Muri:rnne Om:sex; ])un Jl i1111- 1tm n; Sh irlny l,nwcty: Uob L.Yon: \u0026lt;:cnrirc A. McCrnry; Hoh Moon::; Steve .l\\'lorl~y; Utu111y .1lai 11 e5; 1):1\\'id S:i i1t; Boh Sl:cntlc r; On ie \\Vnnl; John Wnnl; Jud]' Wear; (~ rai11 r~er \\V illi;1111 ~, DP.fen~ Phi.lip R Rapln11: .fmtd I1u11i:1111; Joh11 Bilheimer: P.A .. ll ollin ~!-wmth. Appcll cte,;. Nos. D.l-.tr.3R, !H-1U1R, , .. ,,1 D.l--ZIG2. United Stat.es Court: or Appe:tlf::, gight;h Circuit. Suhmitted ,fan. '1, J992. Decided Marc:li ?..!I, .lH92. .Law firm which ,eprescuted school di$ti ict in schoril de~eg-rcg:ll:io11 Ci\\SC n11plied (or att.orney fees for  ~crv icP.s rendP. rr.,1. The United Stat.e~ .Uisl.rkt Court for I.he gast.r.rn Dist.rid n( Ark~nsas, Snsa11 Web her Wrir,hl:, ,J.1 round thnt. di~trict Wt18 a prevnili11g p:ut_y, l:h:it t.l1e parties hn,I agreed l:lrnt clisl:dct would prosecute foe pct.ilions at firm~ pn~vailing 1ntet,, that di~t.rid wonlrl pay tliffcrP.nr:.c bet.ween \\.heir billed ml.rs \"ml \\ltocr.ed~ u.f nny :tU.oi:11cys1 fees award, and 1.hnt I.he p:trtir.~ hnll rnotlifir. cl their n,rrec111c11l. l,t\u0026gt; providP. that ixro11p :ind firm \\\\;ou ld split: ewinly any aw:tnl mncle h_1 the coo rt. I lir,l.rid nppe:ile,1. The Court of Appeals he.lei I.hat: (1) nmouol: of nwanl was neil .her dearly erro1H?.0115 nor ~huM of ,!iscrnl:ion: (2) (i11din1,r l.h:1t. cnt\\- 1-rnd r.xisl.ed hct:wccn clistr id: hnd firm a11d conl.enL\":: of I.Im cont.rnd w:m supported hy I.he e,,idenr.e; and (B) tlisl.ricl: w:is not e::; l: opp,~d 1-(1 dcf~nd :tj{:dn~I: conlP.nl.ion llrnt superin!:cudent had np;recd l.o firm's ptopost, I for r;o;r,o ~plit in aw~rd of :'tU.ornnys' foes . Affirmed. --:..---____ __ _ RECEIVED OCT 3 1 2002 f:t1 -o UC'.' Mn: f~.fl.JI IN THE UNITED ST A TES DISTRICT coultl5'rt:,~N 8itf~,trl 1 OFFICE OF EASTER.t\"'\\J DISTRICT OF AR.KAJ.\"'\\JSAS DC Hicr,4Jtt;SA.s DESEGREGATIOH MOHITORIHG WESTERN DIVISION JAM T 2 5 lOO By.- s VV Mccc , '2 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. NO. 4:82CV00866 WRW/JTR PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL _DISTRICT NO.I, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KA THERINE KNIGHT, ET AL RMA.cic 'L'~F Of: P C(;;;RK DEFENDANTS INTER VEN ORS INTER VEN ORS THE JOSHUA INTERVENOR'S MOTION TO STAY REDUCTION OF ODM STAFF The Joshua Intervenors respectfully move for the entry of an order staying reduction of the - ODM staff, if any, until the final approval of the ODM budget. For cause, the Joshua Intervenors respectfully show the Court as follows: 1. On or about October 14, 2002, Intervenors' counsel learned from an African American staff member of ODM, Ms. Linda Bryant, that she had been given notice of termination as an ODM staff member effective on or about October 15, 2002. Ms. Bryant conveyed to counsel her understanding that her termination was attributable to a directive or requirement of this Couii. 2. Thereafter, in an Order entered on October 16, 2002, this Court recognized that under the law of the case [LRSD v. PCSSD, 971 F.2d 160, 166 (8 1h Cir. 1992)], the pa1iies must have the opportunity for comments and objections prior to final approval of the ODM budget. See Order, para. 3. This Court also wrote that \"no proposed [ODM] budget has yet been submitted .. .. \" Order, para. 4. A. \\j os hua. staymnt -1- 3. The number of ODM staff is a matter encompassed in the ODM budget. 4. In view of the content of the Court's Order of October 16, 2002, it appears that (a) the termination of Ms. Bryant may have resulted from a misunderstanding; (b) alternatively, any actual directive or requirement that Ms. Bryant be te1minated, prior to the completion of the budget-approval process, was inconsistent with the law of the case. WHEREFORE, the Joshua Intervenors respectfully pray that the Court delay any reduction of ODM staff until final approval of the next ODM budget and declare that it was not the Comi's intention that any reduction in ODM staff take place before final budget approval. Robert Pressman, Mass Bar No. 405900 22 Locust A venue Lexington, MA 02421 (781) 862-1955 A: \\joshua.staymnt Respectfully submitted, y' hrr W. Walker, AR Bar No. 64046 / 'JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 (50 l) 3 74-3758 (501) 374-4187 (Fax) Rickey Hicks, AR Bar No. 89235 Attorney at Law Evergreen Place 1100 Nonh University, Suite 240 Little Rock, Arkansas 72207 (501) 663 -9900 -2- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing has been sent by fa~ and U.S. Mail, postage prepaid to the following counsel of record, on this ';2_ ,;1-/4iay of 62-e,6.i..\u0026amp;.-.\u0026gt;c- 2002: Mr. Christopher Heller FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 400 W. Capitol, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Ms. Ann Brown Marshall ODM One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Building 200 West Capitol Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 A: \\jos hua. staymnt Mr. Dennis R. Hansen Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 425 W. Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3 4 72 Mr. Richard Roachell ROA CHELL LAW FIRNf 11800 Pleasant Ridge Road, Suite 146 Post Office Box 17388 Little Rock, Arkansas 72222-73 88 Jo~;lw. Walker  I_ ., - .) - A.uonz2y at Zc.w 1723 Broad,,vcry Lt..,_,l~ Roe~ ld.7,b:?t.ras ';1206 Te!ephor:e (501) 374-3758 Fr=: (501) 374-418~ .L~\"\u0026lt;{ TR.~\"fSiY.J1SSION COv-:E.R SHEET .... J. Da:ie_ ,- L Io ( J.. c I Zo O --z- 1 .;o.- [ Fa::.. [ $7/-0107) i Re: [ Sender~ (_ YOU S'.!.~OuID R.ECE.:.'i/E [__ __( including cover shee~J] Pd.GE(S), INCLUDING TEJS COvL'?. \u0026amp;\u0026lt;-:.TET. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE .tl...LL THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL \"\u0026lt;(501) 374-3758\u0026gt;\" The iD:fur.nmion coi.mined.in tlll! fucs;mile =age is a.ttoraeyprivileged.ao.d coufidenti:il .in:formation im:encied only for the use of tb.e indidua! or entity namd above. Tf the re~e: of mis message is not th.e incencied reci-pie!lt, or tb.e e::nployee or ..g~ ~onsibie ,o ~liver re ro dle in:.;;nd.cd. recrpien.:, you are b.e.--eby ll.O~ed ibar my dissetrinarion. c!L-mbunon or copying of 1bis communication is sn-ictly prohibim. if you have received. dris communic:i.tiOll m =r, pies.se i=.ediE.Ie ilOttty us by ,:clepr..one, and return ,he or:ginal me.;sage to us E.! tb.e above address via die U.S. Pesta! Service. T..:lc.llk you.. ---------------------- ~ RECEIVED OCT 3 1 2002 - OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRJCT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRJCT vs. 4:82CV00866-WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al KA THERINE KNIGHT, et al ORDER FILED E U.S. DISTRICT COURT ASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS OCT 2 5 2002 ~~Mr-Y~_-s_w=GG'.::~::Q~~::':Q~:.C l!;RK -- ~ PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTER VEN ORS INTERVENORS Joshua Intervenors' Motion to Stay Reduction of ODM Staff is DENIED because it is moot- please see the Order entered on October 16, 2002. IT IS SO ORDERED this 25th day of October, 2002. W~0.~- UNITED ST A TESDlSTRICT E THIS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET IN COMPLIANCE (~~~~1~1,j~Q~~~~~.~~ 6 9 2 1N THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. LR-C-82-866 RECEIVED PLAINTIFF PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL OCT 3 0 2002 OfFICEOF DESEGREGATION MONITORJNG DEFENDANTS JNTERVENORS INTER VEN ORS PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO JOSHUA INTERVENOR'S MOTION FOR HEARING REGARDING THE RELEVANCE OF 28 U.S.C.  455 TO THE PRESENT PROCEEDING Plaintiff Little Rock School District (hereinafter \"LRSD\") for its Response to Joshua Intervenor's (hereinafter \"Joshua\") Motion for Hearing Regarding the Relevance of 28 U.S.C.  455 to the Present Proceeding states: 1. Joshua's Motion should be denied for failing to comply with the requirement of Local Rule 7.2(a) that all motions be accompanied by a brief consisting of a concise statement of the relevant facts and applicable law. Joshua essentially seeks to obtain discovery from the Court to determine whether grounds for disqualification exist and an advisory opinion as to the applicability of 28 U.S.C.  455(b)(2). The LRSD knows of no legal authority for Joshua to obtain discovery from the Court. If such legal authority exists, Joshua should include it in a brief as required by Local Rule 7.2(a). It is well-settled that advisory opinions are rarely, if ever, proper in federal litigation. See Order filed Feb. 19, 2002, p. 1 (Docket No. 3576). 2. Joshua's Motion should also be denied because (a) it is too late for Joshua to seek recusal based on the Court's representation of the Honorable Henry Woods over a decade ago and (b) the Court's prior representation of Judge Woods does not require recusal pursuant to 28 U.S.C.  455(a) and (b). WHEREFORE, the LRSD prays that Joshua's Motion be denied; that it be awarded its costs and attorneys' fees expended herein; and that it be awarded all other just and proper relief to which it may be entitled. F:IHOME\\FENDLEYILRSD 200 1\\unitary-rcsponsc-mot-hcaring-DQ wpd Respectfully Submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK Christopher Heller (#81083) John C. Fendley, Jr. (#92182) 2000 Regions Center 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 (501) 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the following people by depositing a copy of same in the United States mail on OctoberZr-, 2002: Mr. John W. Walker JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1 723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Sam Jones Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 2200 Nations Bank Bldg.  200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 425 W. Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201-3472 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell Law Firm Plaza West Building 415 N. McKinley, Suite 465 Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 Ms. Ann Marshall Desegregation Monitor 1 Union National Plaza 124 W. Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Dennis R. Hansen Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 F:\\HOME\\FENOLEY\\LRS D 200 I \\unitary-response-mot-hearing-DQ. wpd 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL   MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL RECEIVED OCT 3 0 2002 OFRCEOF DESEGREGATION MONITORING RECEIVED OCT 3 0 2002 OFACE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTER VEN ORS INTER VEN ORS MEMORANDUM BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO JOSHUA INTERVENOR'S MOTION FOR HEARING REGARDING THE RELEVANCE OF 28 U.S.C.  455 TO THE PRESENT PROCEEDING I. Joshua Cites No Authority Authorizing the Relief Sought. Joshua essentially seeks to obtain discovery from the Court to determine whether grounds for disqualification exist and an advisory opinion as to the appli,cability of 28 U.S.C.  455(b)(2). The LRSD knows of no legal authority for Joshua to obtain discovery from the Court. If such legal authority exists, Joshua should include it in a brief as required by Local Rule 7.2(a). It is clear that Joshua has no right to compel discovery from the Court. See Cheeves v. Southern Clays, Inc., 797 F.Supp. 1570, 1580-81 (M.D. Ga. 1992)(\"At the outset, there is simply no precedent for deposing the presiding judge pursuant to compulsory process in aid of motions to disqualify; and, for a number of practical as well as legal and policy considerations, there is no need or justification for such a procedure.\"). It is equally clear that advisory opinions are rarely, if ever, proper in federal litigation. See Order filed Feb. 19, 2002, p. 1 (Docket No. 3576). For these reasons alone, Joshua's Motion should be denied. II. 28 U.S.C.  455. Joshua's Motion should also be denied because (a) it is too late for Joshua to seek recusal based on the Court's representation of the Honorable Henry Woods over a decade ago and (b) the Court's prior representation of Judge Woods does not require recusal pursuant to 28 U.S.C.  - 455(a) and (b). Each of these grounds for denial will be discussed in tum below. A. It is too late for Joshua to seek recusal based on the Court's representation of the Honorable Henry Woods over a decade ago. The Eighth Circuit has consistently held that motions to disqualify pursuant to 28 U.S.C.  455(a) and (b) must be filed in a timely manner. Holloway v. United States, 960 F.2d 1348 (8th Cir.1992)( claims under 28 U.S.C.  455 must be made in a timely manner); Oglala Sioux  Tribe v. Homestake Mining Co., 722 F.2d 1407, 1414 (8th Cir.1983) (\"Although 455 does not include an explicit time limitation, we believe that a timeliness requirement is appropriate .... \"); United States v. Bauer, 19 F.3d 409, 414 (8th Cir.1994) (\"This court has held that claims under  455 'will not be considered unless timely made.'\") (quoting Holloway). Parties are required to apply for recusal \"at the earliest possible moment after obtaining knowledge of facts demonstrating the basis for such a claim,\" Apple v. Jewish Hosp. \u0026amp; Medical Ctr., 829 F.2d 326, 333 (2nd Cir.1987), for two reasons: (1) a prompt application affords the district judge an opportunity to assess its merits, and (2) a prompt application avoids the risk that a party is holding back a recusal motion as a fall-back position in the face of an adverse ruling. See In re International Business Machines Corp., 45 F.3d 641,643 (2nd Cir.1995); accord In re Cargill, Inc., 66 F.3d 1256, 1262-63 (1st Cir.1995) (\"In the real world, recusal motions are sometimes driven more by litigation strategies than by ethical concerns.\"); Phillips v. Amoco Oil Co., 799 F.2d 1464, 1472 (11th Cir.1986) (\"Counsel, knowing the f    This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\u003c/dcterms_description\u003e\n   \n\n\u003c/dcterms_description\u003e   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/items\u003e"},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_50","title":"Memos received","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["1997-06","1997-07","1997-08","1997-09"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Education and state"],"dcterms_title":["Memos received"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/50"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["memorandums"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nADE Memos Received 6-2-97  School Funds/Types of Funds State Equalization and Trust Fund Aid  Special Education Programs Due Process Hearings  Student Transportation . Arkansas DIRECTOR'S COMMUNICATION ..\n.....\n.\n.~~\n.\n---~ ..... _\n,,,------------------------- 11 ~~IM~~I.~\nKA.!?,1!i~I~.2~ GENE WILHOIT, Director, General Education Division\n' 2 1997 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING Forward Copies To: Superintendents, Co-Op Directors Other: County School Supervisors NO: FIN-97-111 Page 1 of2 Date: May 29, 1997 Type of Memo: Regulatory Response Required By: None There are attachments to this memo. Assistant Director, Finance \u0026amp; Administration: Dr. Bobbie Davis Subject: School Funds/I'ypes of Funds Index Code: DIB State Equaliz.ation and Trust Fund Aid Regulatory Authority: Ark. Code Ann. 6-05-304 through 6-05-306 (Repl. 1993, as amended by 1995 Ark. Acts 1172) and Ark. Code Ann. 6-20-Subchapter 3 (As enacted by 1995 Ark. Acts 917 and 1194) Contact Person: Vivian Roberts Phone No: 682-4258 Attached is the final State Aid printout for 1996-97. This printout reflects funding for all categories shown. Since the December printout was mailed, several districts submitted corrections in data that affect their aid in selected categories and in some cases, affect the aid of other districts. In addition, changes in ADM have been required as a result of attendance audits conducted by the department. Please note the following changes due to these corrections: Educational Excellence Trust Funds\nThe percentage of funds made available to school districts for Educational Excellence Trust Funds is increased from 9.693% in December to 9.696% in May. This is necessary to stay within the total state allotment of $119,145,693. There should be no adverse effect on salary requirements to any district due to this change. Debt Service SUJ)l)lemental Payment: The funding factor is auced from $12.89 in December to $12.88 in May. This is necessary to stay within the total state allotment of $20 million. Director's Communication No. FIN-97-111 May 29, 1997 Page 2 of2 Growth Facilitjes Fundini: The Growth Facilities Funding Rate.is reduced from $599.67 in December to $570.64 in May. The State Average ADM Growth is increased from 1.2'7% in December to 1.36% in May. This adjustment is necessary to stay within the total state allotment of $5 million. This change is a direct result of an attendance audit that affected the Growth Facilities Funding calculation. Please remember that districts were paid 90% of the Growth Facilities Funding in December and the remaining 10% will be paid in June. Although districts will not receive the amount projected in December most districts should receive some additional funds. If these changes have resulted in an overpayment, those districts will be contacted individually. Additional Base Fundin~: Slight changes in Additional Base Funding have occurred due to differences in rounding when calculating each district's Weighted Average Millage Rate. Please review the attached printout and call 682-4258 should you have questions. 11 I'. ,. ,Jl-.1i, (. - 1997 . OrFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING Forward Copies To: Superintendents, Co-op Directors Secondary Principals Middle/Jr. High Principals Elementary Principals Other: LEA Supervisors, *Early Childhood Coordinators *Other Interested Parties NO: FIN-97-112 Page: 1 of 1 Date: May 29, 1997 Type of Memo: Informational Response Required By: Optional There are attachments to this memo. Assistant Director, Finance \u0026amp; Administration: Dr. Bobbie Davis Subject: Special Education Programs Index Code: IHBA Due Process Hearings Regulatory Authority: Arkansas Code Annotated (A.C.A.) Sec. 6-41-216, as mended by Arkansas Act 369 of 1997 and Arkansas Act 1182 of 1997 Contact Person: Marcia Harding Margie Wood Phone No: 682-4222 Attached to this memo are copies of Arkansas Acts 369 and 1182 of 1997, which amended Arkansas Code Annotated Section 6-41-216, Tests and evaluations--Change of child's status--Hearings. Arkansas Act 369 of 1997 was signed into law by the Governor on March 6, 1997. This Act authorizes subpoena power for hearing officers in hearings conducted pursuant to the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Arkansas Act 1182, signed into law on April 8, 1997, further amends A.C.A. Sec. 6-41-216 to clarify the time limit for appeal of hearing officers' decisions in hearings conducted pursuant to the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. These changes go into effect on August 1, 1997\nand apply to due process hearing requests filed on or after that date. *Will be mailed by Special Education. ... Stricken la~ would be deleted from present law. Underlined lan.,auage would be added to prrseot law. - 1 State of Ark.ansas 2 3 81st General Assembly Regular Session, 1997 A Bill ACT 1182 ct 1997 SENA1E BII..l.. ~ 3 8 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ,- -  I 18 By: Sena10r Mahony For An Act To Be Entitled \"AN ACT TD AMEND ARKANSAS CODE ANNOTATED 6-41-216 TD CLARIFY TEE TIME LIMIT FOR APPEAL OF HE.A.RING OFFICERS' DECISIONS IN HEARINGS CONDUCTED PURSUANT TD TEE FEDER.AL INDIVIDUALS wlTE DISABILITIES ACT\nAND FDR OTHER PURl'DSES. II Subtitle (\"\"' 19 \"TD AMEND A.C.A.  6-41-216 TO CLARIFY TEE TIME LIMIT FOR APPEAL OF HE.ARING OFFICERS' DECISIONS PURSUANT TO TEE FEDER..\\!.. INDIVIDUALS wlTE DISAEIL:TI.ES ACT.\" \\  20 21 22 3E IT ENACF..D BY TE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE S\"IATE OF ARKANSAS: ,- .:..:\u0026gt; 24 SECTION l. Arkansas Code Annotated 6-41-216(e) is a::iendec to reac as 25: :foll=s: -::::---26 II ( e) Anv ~artv aggrieved bv the findin2s and dec\nsion =ade bv the I - {/'5-:- hearing office has the right to bring a civil action in either federal\n\u0026gt; ~ district court or a state court of c=Petent iurisdiction pursuant to the _::-29- Individuals vith Disabilities Education Act. Ar.y aggrieved party shall have -:: ~ 0.. ., 33 - _ _-.34 .-: -- 35 .. 36 thirty (30) days after the hearing officer's decision to file an appeal ~-'' SECTION 2. All p~cvisions of this act of a general and pe=iane~t nature are amenciatory to the Arkansas Code of 1987 A=otated and the Arkansas Code Revision Co=ission shall incorporate the same in the Code . 0306971 :2.53.jjd465 ' } 1 \"'~ ' ~ C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 JO ll 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ?_~., 24 .:::- 25\nI/ -- 26 \"~' 27 ,-- 28 -\u0026lt;:' \"\" ~~ 29 J 30 :, .1 / 31 .j -  '\n-   36 SB SECTION 3. If any provision of this act or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held :iDvalid, such invalidity shall not affect - other provisions or applications of the act vhich can be given effect vithout the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this act are declared to be severable. SECTION 4. All lavs =d parts of lavs in conflict vith this act are hereby repealed. r:, ,..:-:.-.i i : 1997 SPEC/A!... ::DIJC.A.TION 2 0306971253.jjd465 i \\ ) - 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 --18 .. _.: .: .. ~-.\u0026gt;\" 19 20 21 21 Stricken lan.,auage would be de.letcrl from present law. Undulined lan.,au.age would be \u0026amp;dded to present law. State of Arkansas 81st ~neral Assembly Regular Session, 1997 A Bill ACT 369 01 1997 i_- SENA TE Bil.J.., 2,_ ~ By: Scna10r Mahony . For An Act To Be Entitled \"AN ACT TO AMEND ARK.'iliSAS CODE ANNOTATED  6-41-216 TO AUTEORIZE SUBPOENA POWER FOR HE.ARING OFFICERS IN HEARINGS CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO TRE FEDERAL INDIVIDUALS w\"ITII DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT\nAND FOR OTE:R ?lJRl\u0026gt;OSES.\" Subtitle \"TO AUTEORIZE SUBPOENA POWER FDR HE.ARING OFFICERS IN HEARINGS CONDUCrLD PURSUANT TD THE FEDERAL INDIVIDUALS mnr DISA.BILITIES EDUCATION ACT.\" BE IT ENACTED BY 'IRE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS: SECTION l. Arkansas Code Jumorared  6-41-216 is =ended ro read as follc,-c.\ns: \"6-41-216. Tesrs and evaluarions - Cb=ge of child's srarus - Hea=:::.ngs .  (a) All decis::!.ons_ perra::!.ning ro change in rhe educar:ional srarus of a child shall foll=due proces~ procedures esrabl:ished by rhe Srare Boa=ci of Educa.::ion. (b) Due pro~ess shall :!.Delude: ( 1) Providing for prior norificar.ion ro pare::i_rs of resr.ing and provision of special educarion services\n(2) The =ighr ro requesr educario=l evalu.arion =d special educarion services\nand (3) The r:ighr ro hearing =d appeal of educarional decisions. (c)(l) The Srare Board of Educarion shall prescribe =ules and regula.:ions gove=~g hearings and appeals. (2) Hearings shall be conducred by i::ic:iv:iduals hereinafrer 0123971555.ijd157 SB 2 (3)(A) The board shall establish standards and qualifications fo~ 3 individuals to serve as hearing officers. 4 5 an employee of the local school district involved in a particular heari::lg may 6 serve as a hearing officer. 7 (C) Professional service contracts v.i.th individu...ls made 8 for the purpose of compensating the:n for services rendered in co=ecticn vith 9 hearings shall not constitute employment. 10 (d) An individual serving as a qualified hearing officer at an assigned 11 hearing shall be :i=u.~e fro.n civil s~it brought by either party for the 12 consequences of actions required of a hearing officer. 13 14 (e)(l) An individual servin as a qualified hearing officer under this section shall have the PO-Jer to\nssue subpoenas and to bring before h,~ as a 15 vitness any uerson in this state. (2) The hearing officer shall issue a subuoena uuon the reouest of anv uartv to a uending uroceed\nng. 16 17 18 (3) The =it shall be directed to the sheriff of the countv -.:here - :. .. 19 the -.:itness resides or may be found. 20 (4) The =\nt mav reouire the vitness to bring vith him an. book, 21 =iting, or other thing under his control ~hich he is bo=d bv lav to ?reduce 22 in evidence. J (5) Service of the '-'Tit shall be in the canner as urovided bv lau ,- for the service of subuoenas in civil cases. (f)(l) -A v.i.tness vho has been served bv subuoena in the canner u~cvideci 1bv lav and vho shall have been paid or tendered the legal fees for travel and ~ ' ~ttendance as urovided bv lav shall be obligated to attend for exar:iination of ~ the trial of the cause pending before the board. 5 \\ ': ~ 2 9-' V I -::i ! (2) In the event a v:l.tness shall have been served ~ith sub?oenas as herein urcvided and fails to attend the bearing in obedience to the ~ ~I subuoena, f ~\nthe hearing officer cav au?l\u0026gt; to the circuit court of the count, r-~3~ ~4 c-:1 -5 vherein the hear\nng officer is having the hearing for an order causing the arrest of the vitness and directing that the vitness be brought before (3) The court shall have the PO-Jer to uunish the disobedient ~\n.--~~-~i ~t~n~e~s~s~~f~o~r~c=o~n~t~e~==~t~a~s~=u~r~=~1==d~e~d~b~v-~l~a~~-~\n~n~t~h~e~~t~r~1~a=l~o~f~=c=\n~v~i~l~=c~a~s~e~s~. =~\nr - 2 0123971555.ijd 157 - 1 (4) The disobedient vit~ess shail be liable in da=iages for 2 nonattendance to the trial or hear\nng as provide~ b, lav. 3 4 hearing officer's decision to file an appeal pursuant to the federal 5 Individuals Yith Disabilities Education Act.\" SB 6 7 SECTION 2. ill provisions of this act of, general a.nd pe=anent nature 8 are amendatory to the Arkansas Code of 1987 ~otated a:::id the Arkansas Code 9 Revision C=ission shall iD.corporate the same i.:l the Code. 10 11 SECTION 3. If any provision of this act or the ap?lication thereof to 12 any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect 13 other provisions or applications of the act ~hich can be given effect vithout 14 the invalid provision or application, a.nd to this end the provisions of this 15 act are declared to be severable. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 SECTION 4. ill lavs and parts of lavs in conflict vith this act are hereby repealed. 3 APPROVED JI~ .fv__. 7- l , qi GOVERNOR 0123971555.ijd 157 ,, Arkansas DIRECTOR'S COMMUNICATION DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 4 STATE CAPITOL MALL LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-1071  (501) 682-4475 ~ECf ~\\ffED GENE WILHOIT. Director, General Education Division OFflCE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING Forward Copies To: Superintendents, Co-Op Directors NO: FIN-97-114 Page: 1 of 1 Date: May 29, 1997 Type of Memo: Informational Response Required By: None There are attachments to this memo. Assistant Director, Finance \u0026amp; Administration: Dr. Bobbie Davis Subject: Student Transportation Index Code: EEA Regulatory Authority: NIA Contact Person: Spence Holder Phone No: 501-682-4264 Twelve (12) surplus school buses used in the Pulaski County School Desegregation Transportation program will be subject to an auction on Monday, June 23, 1997. The time of the auction will be 10 a.m. The sale will be conducted at the Pulaski County School District bus compound located in Sweet Home (map attached). The buses may be inspected from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. at this location on June 20, 1997. Buses will also be on display from 8 a.m. until 10 a.m. on sale day. These buses were in use during the 1996-97 school year. See attached for additional data on these buses and map to bus compound. - Bus Number 1-3M-539 1-3M-184 1-3M-182 1-3M-542 1-3M-536 1-3M-176 1-3M-131 1-3M-138 1-3M-173 1-3M-174 1-3M-175 1-3M-183 Magnet Buses Subject to Auction June 23, 1997 Make Year Miles VIN Number GMC 1987 162,861 2GDHG31K4H4516379 Senator 1990 151,658 48SlA11XOLL000141 GMC 1990 175,996 485H1AAXOLL000138 GMC 1987 128,811 2GDHG31K4H4516391 GMC 1987 186,803 2GDHG31K4H4516316 Senator 1990 186,254 48SA1AAX6LL000130 GMC 1987  62,741 1GDJ6P1B0HV533191 GMC 1987 170,000 1GDJ6P1B0HV533251 Senator 1990 124,978 48SAIAAX3LL000134 Senator 1990 98,078 48SAIAAX8LL000131 Senator 1990 110,684 48SAIAAXFLL000135 Senator 1990 118,560 48SA7AAX9LL000140 ALL BUSES 65 PASSENGERS Little Rock A  Area Map 1 \\'-----:--Bu s c:\"'f '\" .,J ADE Memos Received 6-9-97  Student Transportation  K-3 Summer Program Administration  Technology Resources Satellite Instruction for the 1997-98 School Year  Safety Drills Tri-Annual Fire Drill Reports  Supervision of Professional Staff Teacher Supervision Workshop for New Elementary/Secondary Principals --  '  Amansas DIRECTOR'S COMMUNICATION DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION RECEI ' ~E CAPITOL MALL LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-1071  (501) 682-4475 y CU GENE WILHOIT, Director, General Education Division JUN ~: - 1997 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORINQ Forward Copies To: Superintendents, Co-Op Directors NO: FIN-97-113 Page: 1 of 1 Date: June 5, 1997 Type of Memo: Informational Response Required By: None There are attachments to this memo. Assistant Director, Finance \u0026amp; Administration: Dr. Bobbie Davis Subject: Student Transportation Index Code: EEA Regulatory Authority: N/ A Contact Person: Spence Holder Phone No: 501-682-4264 ..- The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has strongly recommended that a copy of the School Bus Safety Assurance Program Recall Listing be forwarded to each school district. Attached is that copy. Also, NHTSA and the Arkansas Department of Education encourage all school districts to develop and implement a program that would insure that all outstanding recall work is completed on each school bus within the district's fleet during the summer vacation maintenance period. U.S. Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Dear Mr. Spence Holder: 1-'iAY 2 7 1937 SCHOOL TR,4. N5,.0RTATtON 400 Seventh Street, S. W. Washington. D.C. 20590 NSA-lllwbl TAB97-001a The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is 'writing this letter to provide State Pupil Transportation Directors with the enclosed third annual NHTSA School Bus Safety Assurance Program Recall Listing. Safety recalls involving school bus handrails remain of great concern to the agency. There continue to be reports of children snagging articles of clothing on the handrails as they exit the bus. To date. defective school bus handrails have caused at least seven fatalities and numerous injuries. State Pupil Transportation Directors are again requested to emphasize to each school district the importance of immediately having all relevant handrail recall remedy work completed on all involved school buses. Information specifically relating to school bus handrail recalls can be found in the Recall Listing on pages 6 through 10. The agency has included a new section in this year's edition that specifically identifies new school bus recalls that have been initiated since the publication of the last Recall Listing in June 1996. Information on these new school bus recalls can be found in the current Recall Listing on pages 11 through 16. NHTSA strongly recommends that a copy of the School Bus Safety Assurance Program Recall Listing be forwarded to each school district. In addition, the agency is requesting each State Pupil Transportation Director to encourage all state school districts to develop and implement - SAFETY BEL TS SAVE LIVES AUTO SAFETY HOTLINE (800) 424-9393 Wash. D.C. Area 366-0123 a program that would ensure that all out-standing recall remedy work is completed on each school bus within the district's fleet during the summer vacation maintenance period. School buses owned and/or operated by contractors should also be advised of the safety recalls and provide assurances to the state/district that all recall work is completed. The agency has also included a User Comment Form in this year's edition. The primary purpose of the User Comment Form is to allow you the user to make suggestions on how future editions of the School Bus Safety Assurance Program Recall List can be improved to better serve the users of this information. The agency strongly encourages you to complete the User Comment Form and fax it back to us at the number indicated on the form. The success of the School Bus Safety Assurance Program is dependent on the willingness of each of us concerned with the transportation of children to review the enclosed recall listing and make every effort to ensure that buses within their purview are corrected during the summer vacation maintenance period. If you have any questions concerning the School Bus Safety Assurance Program, please contact either Mr. Bill Lewis or Mr. Jon White of my staff at (202) 366-5227 or by facsimile at (202) 366-7882. Copies of this publication and the User Comment Form are also available on NHTSA's web site located at http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov. If you have any questions concerning a specific recall campaign, please call the involved manufacturer at the phone number given in the recall listing or call NHTSA' s Auto Safety Hotline at (800) 424-9393. Enclosures: School Bus Safety Recall Campaign Listing User Comment Form Sincerely, ~v~ Kathleen C. Demeter, Director Office of Defects Investigation Safety Assurance .. .. ----=----=-------54 SCHOOL Bus SAFETY AsstJRANCE PROGRAM RECALL LISTING: JANUARY 1992 THROUGH APRIL 1997 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington. D.C. 20590 Auto Safety Hotline 800-424-9393 Wash. D.C. area 202-366-0123  SCHOOL BlTS SAFETY ASSURANCE PROGRAM RECALL LISTING FROM JANUARY 1992 THROUGH APRIL 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Special Section School Bus Handrail Program Schoui Bus Handrail Recall .\\u\u0026lt;.iil Program School Bus Handrail Program Handrail Inspection Procedure Handrail Recall Listing Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard Listing ~ew School Bus Recalls Definitions .\\mrr:rn . Blue Bird Carpemer.'Crown :vtid Bus ...... . '.\\avisrar Sturdicorp1US Bus Thomas Built .... Wayne/Harsco School Bus Vehicle Recalls ..... 4 . . . . .. .. 6 ... 7 ...... 8 ..... 9 10 13 . . . . . . . 13 ... ... .... 14 14 . . . ... 14 15 16 ........ .. .. .... 17 Amtran .......... . . ....................... 19 Blue Bird .... . . ... . . ... ... 21 24 25 Carpemer:Crown Coach \u0026amp; Equipment Collins ............. . .. . . 25 Eldorado :--.:arional . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . Ford ... .... . . ..... . ......................... ... ......... . GM.... ... . . .......                                Gillig ........... .. . . . Girardin .................................................. . LES Entreprises/Corbeil ........................................ . 25 26 26 27 27 27 Mid Bus ........ .. . ........................................ 27 Navistar Oshkosh Spa nan ........... .. ..... .. ..... .. ... . . ...... . ..... . . ... .. . Superior1United Technologies .. ... .. ... ......... ... ...... . .... . 28 31 31 31 Sturdicorp1CS Bus . . .. ... ... .... ... .... ... . ..... . .... ... 32 SCHOOL BtTS SAFETY ASSURANCE PROGRAM RECALL LISTING FROM JANUARY 1992 THROUGH APRIL 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . . ... 4 Special Section School Bus Handrail Program Schooi Bus Handrail Rec:lll .\\uuii Program .6 School Bus Handrail Program .. . .. .. 7 Handrail Inspeciion Prnu:Jure .8 HanJrail Recall Listing .. . . . . . .... 9 Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard Listing :\\1ew School Bus Recalls Definitions .\\mtr\n_in . Blue Bird C\n_irpemer 1Crnwn :-vtid Bus ...... . . \u0026gt;i aYistar Smrdicorp1US Bus Thomas Built .. Wayne/Harsco School Bus Vehicle Recalls Amlran .. Blue Bird . . Carpemer1Crown Coach \u0026amp;: Equipment Collins Eldorado N auonal Ford .......... . GM ...... . ...... . Gillig Girardin ........ ...... ............ ...... .. .. ... . .......... . LES Emreprises/Corbeil ... .. . . .. . ...... ..... . ....... . ...... .. .. . Mid Bus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . ....... .. . . .. . Navistar .............. ... .. .. .. . .. . . . . ....... ........ . ... . . Oshkosh .. .. . .......... .. ............... . ............... . . . Spartan .... ......... . Superior/ United Technologies Sturdicorp(CS Bus 2 12 13 13 14 14 14 15 16 17 19 21 24 25 25 25 26 26 27 27 27 27 28 31 31 31 32 - - \\ Thomas Built . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 Transi-Corp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 Van-Con ....... .. . ... .... .. ... . . ... ... . ....... .... ..... .. .. 38 Wayne:Harsco ......... . ...... . . . . . .. .. . ............ .. . . .. . . . 38 School Bus Equipment Recalls Carpenter . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                  ~ Hercules Engine .. . .. .. ..... . ..... . . . . . . . .... . ............. . .. 40 Kinedyne . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . ..  . .                        ~ Wells Aluminum ... . ..... . .. .. ... ... . . . ...... ........... . . . . . 41 Current School Bus Investigations Safety Defect Investigations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 Federal Motor \\'ehicle Safety Standard Compliance Investigations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 3 SCHOOL BUS SAFETY ASSURANCE PROGRAM INTRODUCTION TO 1997 EDITION The .':ational Highway Traffic Safery AJministration \u0026lt; ~HTSA l is the Federal government agency responsible for assuring the safety nf vehicles traveling the public roadways. '.':HTSA performs this responsibility. in pan. by monitoring the perform:mce of ,safety recall campaigns conducted hy manufacturers to remeJy a safety defect or noncompi-iancecondition. The prompt remedy of school huses involved in safety recall campaigns is of special concern to rhe agency because the student occupants of a school bus could he subject to multiple injuries or even loss ,1r life if a recalled safety defect or noncompliance condition is not corrected in a timely manner. In order to respond to heightened public concern regarding the safety of students riding school buses. the agency initiated the \"School Bus Safety Assurance Program\" in May 1995. The main purpose of this program is to inform State Transportation Inspection Program Directors. State Pupli Transpnnation Dirccrors. interested association groups. schooi Jistricr :--ersnnnel. nonpublic s..:hool bus uwners. parents. and members nl the general puhlic t)r' the current safety recalls involYing school huses. The School Bus Recall Listing consists of all school bus related safery recall camoaigns that have heen initiated by school hus manufacturers for the past five years. .-\\n updated Recall Listing will be published in May of each succeeding year. just prior to the beginning or' the school bus summer vacation maintenance period. Each recall entry gives the following information: (a) the corporate name of the recalling manufacturer(s): (b) the phone number of the recalling manufacturer(s): (c) the production dates of the school buses being recalled: (d) the school bus modeI(s) being recalled: (e) the number of school buses being recalled: (f) the NHTSA assigned recall number: (g) the manufacrurer assigned recall number if different from the NHTSA assigned recall number: and (h) a brief description of the safety recall campaign. School buses remain nne of the safest forms of transportation in the united Srates. The success of the School Bus Safety Assurance Program is dependent on rhe willingness of each of us concerned with the transportation of children to review the enclosed recall listing and make every effort to insure that buses within our purview are corrected as soon as possible. If you have any questions concerning the School Bus Safety Assurance Program. please contact either Mr. Bill Lewis or Mr. Jon White at (202) 366-5227 or by facsimile at \u0026lt;202) 366-7882. Copies of this publication are also available on NHTSA's web site located at http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov. If you have any questions concerning a specific recall campaign. please call the involved manufacrurer at the phone number given in the recall listing or call NHTSA's Auto Safety Hotline at (800) 424-9393.  . a - SPECIAL SECTION SCHOOL BUS HANDRAIL RECALLS 5 School Bus Handrail Recall Audit Program All safety recall campaigns heing conducted by school bus manufacturers 10 correct defective ~chool hus handrails are heing audi1eJ hy the agency . '.'IHTSA is taking this unprecedented action in \\ lrder to assure that all sl.'.honl buses \\\\ ith defecti,e handrails ha,e the necessary recall remedy work completed. For eal.'.h handrail recall campaign the recalling manufacturer is requested lO provide a list of all involved school bus owners lO the agency. Based on this list. a letter is, sent by the agency to all owners of school buses which are identified as not having the necessary recall work completed . A survey is also sent lO a representative sample of school bus owners involved in each recall campaign to identify recall related problems and to verify that the recall remedy is actually correcting 1he handrail snagging condition .. \\II recall related problems iJentified by '1HTS . .\\  ~ mrnc\nr surYey are rhen rnr\\\\'anl rn rhe recailing manufacturer for resolution. 6  School Bus Handrail Program E n:n though school buses\nire\nirnon~ tht: s\nifest of all modes of transportation. :m aYerage of about -+2 school children are kilkd eacn yl!ar in schooi bus-related incidents. Since most children arc h.ilkd or in_iured outsidl! thi: hus.\nHtention should be focused on the entrance and the imml.:'Ji:11c area around thi: i1us -:ntrancl.:'. Ri:cl!ntly. in ri:sponsi: to the incn:ased number of hanor::ii i snagging incidents. the :\ncilot,i bus handrail issu0- became onl! nf :\\HTS:\\ s highest priorities This l!ffort has tocusl!d L111 the snagging of children s clothing or book bag straps on stairneil handrails as \"ell as thi: rdated issut:s of dri,er training and clothing design. As a result of these endeaYors. many bus manufacturers are conducting satety recall campaigns to modify handrails. It is important to note that certain of the handrail recalls initiated in I 993 have been superseded by new. improved remedies. School buses involved in these earlier recalls must be re-campaigned. Care must be exercised in re\\\"iewing the current recall listing. 7 Handrail Inspection Procedure A uniform procedure for inspecting school bus handrails. and identifying tho~e which pose a safety hazard. has been developed. This inspection procedure applies to all types of school buses and should be used to test all school bus handrails. Inspection Tool This inspection procedure will use a standard 1/2 .. hex nut measuring 3/4 .. across the flats. This nut is tied to l/8\"'thick cotton cord measuring 36\" in length with overhand knots. The drawstring should have a minimum length of 30\" when tied to the nut and attached so that a pull of at least ten pounds does not separate the nut from or break the drawstring. All inspectors conducting school bus inspections should be equipped with this inexpensi\\'e tool. l nspection Proccdu re 1. Stand on the ground outside t ,r the hus , Drnr the inspection to()I het\\\\een the handrail and step well wall. ~imulatin~ the typical way students exit the hus 3. Draw the inspection tool through the handrail in a smo0th. continuous slow motion 4. Repeat this procedure several times (minimum of three times) Note: It is important to drop the inspection tool over the handrail in such a way as to simulate a child exiting the bus. This is a drop and drag test. Do not create a snagging situation by placing the nut in an area that would not be exposed to a drawstring 0r other articles. Inspection Results 1. Take the bus out of service and repair it if the inspection tool catches or snags anywhere on the handrail. 2. If the nut separates from the drawstring or the drawstring breaks. reassemble the tool and retest. If the inspection tool pulls freely without catching or snagging. the bus should not be rejected. This inspection procedure is intended as a means of objectively identifying those handrails with a potential for a safety hazard. Inspectors should not recommend procedures for handrail modification. Safety recall compliance should be ensured during c:ach inspection. It is important to inspect all school buses including those that have heen repaired. 8 .. .. .. \" Compan, .\\mtr:rn Blue Bird Carpenter Coach \u0026amp; Equipment Collins Corbeil Gillig Girardin :Vlid Bus 'iturdicorp. L'S Bus SCHOOL BUS HANDRAIL RECALL LISTING Production Buses Recall ln\\'ol\\'ed '.',umber Model{sl I .2 80-4,43 29.484 93V-032.002 /9300 I) Ward. Patriot. \u0026amp; Volunteer Superseded by Recalls 96 V-046 and 96 V -04 7. 486-2. 96 .2.650 ll6V-046 (%.30 I I Ward. Pa1rim. \u0026amp; Volunteer 4 86-3 96 ~4.91)() 96V-0471%.30.21 i\u0026lt;Jl-396 :'.800 %V-048 (9630.3) I \u0026lt;J 1-1 97 :.480 97V-ll I 4 \u0026lt; 9730 I \u0026gt; 8:7\u0026lt;J-7 88 6.3.81.2 95V-187 (R95AVl 180-3 \u0026lt;J6 18.000 \u0026lt;J6V-073 (R96BG) 3/80-3/92 20.825 93V-032 (R93AB) Superseded by Recall \u0026lt;J5V-090 ~ S0-4 l), :-:-.1 S\u0026lt;J 95V-09() 1 R95 .\\S 1 / \u0026lt;l4-: ()(, 8 95-1: ()5 :u:\n%\\-1,-:-s \u0026lt;RlJ6BC1 %\\'-OJ: (R%BC1 5 90-1 I 92 8.950 93 V-032.003 Superseded by Recall \u0026lt;J6 V-042 :,90-1195 :0.9:i() \u0026lt;l6V-042 5 \u0026lt;J0-5 % 3 . .38.2 96V-0\u0026lt;J7 I 80-1.2. 92 2.6 71 \u0026lt;J3 V-032.005 Superseded by Recall 96V-062 1/80-3'96 2.65\u0026lt;J 96V-062 11/85-5/93 2,833 93V-032.006 3/86-6/95 250 96V-076 R:S33tl2. RS3505. RS3-:-os. RS.39 I I. Patriot. \u0026amp; volunteer Genesis Volunteer SBCV All American. Conventional. TC.2000. Minibird. Wide Body, \u0026amp; Type A Van All American \u0026amp; TC2000 \\II American\u0026amp;:. TC.2000 .\\II American. Li\\lC\\'. ,iP\\\\ B. \\H3WB. SBCV. \\'CT.\\.~ TC:000 GvlC\\' \u0026amp; SBC\\ .\\AFE .. \\II American. fCFE. .-..: TC.2000 Cadet. Classic. \u0026amp; Classma1c: C1det. Classic. ~ Cl\nissm::ir~ Cadet. Classic. Classmate . .i.: Counselor Fortibus \u0026amp; Fortivan Fortibus \u0026amp; Fortivan Bantam Minibus 1/86-6,93 372 93V-032.007 Phantom 1'89-12'94 386 95V-120 MBll\u0026amp;SBI00O I 88-6193 .2.826 \u0026lt;J6V- I 69 Superior I 80-1: 93\n_690 93V-03.2.008 Sturdibus \u0026amp; Swrdivan Superseded by Recalls 96V-.205 and 96V-:06. 1086-1093 :.991 96V-205 Sturdibus\u0026amp;Sturdi\\an I 95-\u0026lt;J 96 616 96V-206 Sturdibus. Eagle. \u0026amp; t..:ni\\ersc: Superior1 L'nited Tech. unavail. 20.000 \u0026lt;J6V-079 School Bus Thomas Built 4177-1 92 i9.216 93V-032.001 All Star. Conventional. \\ligh1y Mite. Minotour, Safety-T-Liner. \u0026amp; Vista Van-Con Superseded by Recalls 96V-054 and 96V-080. 4177-1 /92 4.500 96V-054 All Star. Conventional. Mighty Mite. Minotour. 4 77-3 96 116.933 96V-080 7191-2.'96 30.435 96V-105 Superseded by Recall 97V-03 1 - \u0026lt;J 1-2 96 :4.082 Q7V-03 I I 92-'.' 96 :.068 96V-164 96V-0o5 93V-03:.004 9 Safety-T-Liner. \u0026amp; Vista All Star. Conventional. l\\lighty Mite. Minotaur. Safety-T-Liner. \u0026amp; Vista Conventional Conventional \\IVP .. .\\II Star. \u0026amp; Saf-T-L111c:r . .\\ II Siar. Con\\en11ona1. \\ I 1noltlur. \\ 1 VP. Saf-TL iner. \u0026amp; \\'ista Type A List Of School Bus Related Federal Motor Vehicle Safetv Standards F eder:il \\ 1otor Vehicle S:ifrty S t:ind:ird :\\o. l 05. Hydraulic Brake System. h:dcr:il \\lotor Vehicle S\n_ikt.': \\t:ind:mi '\\,). 111. Re:inil.'.\\\\ :\\lir, rors. Feder:il \\lotor \\'l.'.hick SJ.fl.'.!\\ St:ind:ird '\\u. l 15. Vehicle ldentitic:ition \\:umba.  Feder:il :\\1otor Vehicle S:itet\\ St:ind:ird No. 120. Tire Selection and Rims for Vehicles Other Than Passenger Cars. Federal Motor Vehicle S:ifety Stand:ird :'Jo. 121. Air Brake Systems: l eder:ii \\ lotor \\\"ehiclc Sakt, \\tJ.ncbrd '\\u. I~ 1. Sl.'.hool Bus l\\:dcstrian Sakt, i)~, 1cl.'.s. ,~ eJer:il \\ lo tor \\' l.'.hic k S\n_ifct\\ \\ t\n_inJ:m.i '\\ o . .209. safety Belt .\\ssemiJlies: Federal \\ 1otor \\' ehick Sa1'e1y ...\nt:indJ.rd '\\o. : 10. safety Belt .. -\\ssembly Anchorages ... [eder:il \\1otor Vehicle S:ifety St:indard '.'Jo . .217. Bus Window Retention and Rek:ise: Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard :'io. 221.  School Bus Body Joint Strength.\" Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 222. \"School Bus Passenger Seating: Federal \\1otor Vehicle Safety Standard\n\\Jo. 301. '\"Fuel System Integrity: Federal \\1otor \\'ehidc S\n_ifety \\t\n_inJ:ird :\\o. 304. compressed '.'Jaturai Gas Fuel Container lntegrity: 10 ~,\\' SCHOOL BUS RECALLS FROM JULY 1996 THROUGH APRIL 1997 11 SCHOOL BUS SAFETY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DEFINITION OF TERMS USED IN SAFETY RECALL CAMPAIGN LISTING '.\\:HTS..\\: :--.:acional Highway Trarlk S:ifecy .\\dminisrrarion . Production Dates: The beginning :ind ending manufacrurer daces of rhe school huses involved in che recall campaign. Involved: The number of school buses or school bus equipment items involved in rhe safety recall campaign. '.\\:lodeHs}: The school bus model or models involved in the recall campaign. 97\\\"-000: Recall numher assigneJ hy :\\HTS.--\\. \\\u0026gt;nee a ~chool hus manuraccurcr ,.otir'ics che agency char a safety recall will he condUl.:tcJ. 100000): Manufacturer assigned recall c1mpaign number char differs from the :\\HTSA recall number. Some manufacrurers do nor use separate recall numbers . Recall Description: A brief description of rhe recall campaign. SAMPLE AMERICAN TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION CAMTRANl Production Dates: 1/91-1/97 Model(s): Volunteer (800) 843-5615 Involved: 2.480 Recall ~umber \u0026amp; Description: 97V-0 I 4 \u0026lt; 9730 l) The doching of a scudent rider can become snagged in rhe exir door hand rail. 12 AMERICAN TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION \u0026lt;AMTRAN} Production Dates: 1 /91-1 '9i buses :\\lodel(s): Volunteer (800) 843-5615 lmolved: 2 .480 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 91 \\ -0 I-+ 1.q730 I l The clothing or\" a sru,km\nider can become snagged in the exit door hand rail. Production Dates: 3.'95-1 97 .\\lodel(s): RS. RC. \u0026amp; RE Involved: 1.4 73 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 97V-048 (97501) The power steering rerurn hose can crack due to power steering fluid expansion during cold weather. Production Dates: 5/95-3/96 Involved: 488 \\lodel(sl: RS3302. RS3.505. RS3708. LI.\n: RS391 l Recall '.\\umber \u0026amp; Description: \u0026lt;:)fiV-13-+ 19630-+1 The rear w1miO\\\\ nuzza S:lmtd fail to activate when the rear window is unlatched as required hy FcJcral \\lotor \\chick ~:.1!i!ty '-tandard :--.Jo. 217. Bus \\\\'indow Retemion and Rekas.: ... Production Dates: 5/96-10196 Involved: 194 .\\lodel(s): RS3302. RS3505 . .\\: RS3708 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 96V-221 (96306) The wrong lubricant was used in the parking brake air chambers during production. ***************************************************************************** BLUE BIRD BODY COMPANY Production Dates: -+177-7 '96 :vtodel(s): All American (912) 825-9608 Involved: 10. 969 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 96V-l 12 (R96BK) The amount of fuel leaked from the fuel system during a vehicle crash exceeds the amount allowed by Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 301. fuel System Integrity ... Production Dates: 1/95-12/95 Involved: 12 :\\lodel(s): TC2000 \u0026amp; CSFE Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 96V-132 (R96BJ) The hydraulic brake hoses can leak fluid as a result of coming in contact with various air suspension system components. Production Dates: 5/96-7 '96 .\\lodel(s): TC2000 \u0026amp; QB Imolved: 5  Recall '.\\umber \u0026amp; Description: 96V-198 \u0026lt;R96BN) The electric powenrain drive motor rotors are the - 13 wrong size. Production Dates: 5.'96-8196 Involved: 142 \\lodel(s): TC2000 . All American. CSRE. -\": QB Recall '.\\umber \u0026amp; Description: % \\. -180 \u0026lt; R96BLl The power steering hoses were incorrectly manuractured. CARPE'.\\TER .\\IA\n'\\l'FACTCRI:\\G, I'.\\C.,'CRO\\\\'N COACH Production Dates: l /92-12/92 Model(s): School Bus (812) 849-3131 Involved: 101 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 96\\. -168 The wrong electric fuel pump motor was installed during rroducrion. Production Dates: .:5 '94-6, 96 \\lodel(s): School Bus~ Cbs\nmare 11 lnvoived: 23 Recall '.\\umber \u0026amp; Description: %\\-102.UOl The fuel rank was punctured during compliance testing resulting in a failure 10 meet the re~uiremenrs of federal \\loror \\ 'ehicle Safety Standard '.\\o. 301 . --Fuel System lntet!rit~  MID BUS. INC. (419) 358-2500 Production Dates: 1 / 88-6 '9 3 Involved: 2.826 \\fodel(s): Superior Recall '.\\umber \u0026amp; Description: l/h \\' -1 b9 The clothing of a ~rudent rider can become snagged in the exit door hand rail. ~A VIST AR INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORTATION CORP (800) 448-7825 Production Dates: 1/81-8/94 Involved: l 71.638 :Wodel(s): 1723. 1753. 1823. 1853. 3600. 3700. \u0026amp; 3800 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 96V-l 92 (96507) The turn signal lever could be difficult to operate due to resistance. 14 Production Dates: l /92-9196 :\\lodel(s): 3600. 3800. \u0026amp; 3900 Involved: 580 Recall :'\\umber \u0026amp; Description 96V-174 (96505, The anti-lock brake sensor wires could have been misrouted to the wrong wheel or brake sensor during production. Production Dates: 2.'96-6 ,96 \\-lodel(s): 4700 lmolved: 232 Recall :'\\ umber \u0026amp; Description 96 V-154 , 9650-4, The tube portion of the steering column was welded incorrectly during production. Production Dates: 5/96-11/96 Model(s): 3800 Involved: 727 Recall ~umber \u0026amp; Description 96V-239 (96509) The accelerator pedal could catch on the edge of the tloor \\\\hich could prevent the pedal from returning t() 1he idle position. Production Dates: 9196- \\ l),'96 Involved: 233 :\\lodel(s): 3800. -4700. -4900. S 100. S200. 9200. \u0026amp; 9400 Recall :'\\umber \u0026amp; Description 96 \\\" -240 ( 96510) The rear axle assemblies were improperly heat treated during production. STURDICORP/US Bus Manufacturina=, Inc, Production Dates: 10/86-10/93 Model(s): Sturdibus \u0026amp; Srurdivan (914) 357-2510 Involved: 2.991 Recall\n\\Jumber \u0026amp; Description 96\\'-205 The clothing of a student rider can become snagged in the exit door hand rail. Production Dates: 1/95-9/96 Involved: 616 Model(s): Sturdibus. Eagle. \u0026amp; Universe Recall :\\'.umber \u0026amp; Description 96V-206 The clothing of a student rider can become snagged in the exit door hand rail. Production Dates: 1/95-9/96 Involved: 89 Model(s): Eagle Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 96V-162.003 The fuel tank was punctured during compliance testing resulting in a failure to meet the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 301. Fuel System Integrity. 15 THO'.\\IAS BUILT BUSES. INC. (910) 889-4871 Production Dates: 4/77-7 /96 Involved: 120.162 Model(s): All Star. Conventional. .\\1inotour. .\\1VP . .\\1ighty Mite. Saf-T-Liner. \u0026amp; Vista Recall :\\'umber \u0026amp; Description 96 V-139 The clothing of a student rider can become snagged in the exit~ Joor control rod assembly. Production Dates: 9/88-1 '96 :\\lodel(s): Saf-T-Liner Involved: 695 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 97V-030 The suspension beam can contact and damage the brake chamt clamp band. Production Dates: 7 /91-2/96 :\\fodel(s): Conventional Involved: 24,082 Recall :\\'umber \u0026amp; Description 97\\'-03 I The clothing ot a student rider can hernme snagged in the exit Joor h:md r:iil. Production Dates: I /92-7196 Involved: 2.068 Model(s): MVP. All Star. \u0026amp; Saf-T-Liner Recall :\\'umber \u0026amp; Description 96 V-164 The clothing of a student rider can become snagged in the exit door hand rail . Production Dates: 8/92-6/96 Involved: 400 Model(s): Minotour Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 96V-162.002 The fuel tank was punctured during compliance testing resulting in a failure to meet the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard '.\\io. 301. Fuel System Integrity: Production Dates: 11/94-11/96 '.\\1odel(s): Saf-T-Liner Invohed: 1.800 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 97V-018 Th1: nut that secures the main power supply unit can loosen possibly resulting in the loss of vehicle power. Production Dates: 6/95-2/96 Involved: 18 Model(s): Conventional. Vista. Minotour. Saf-T-Liner. All Star. MVP. \u0026amp; Mighty Mite Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 96V-189 The fittings used to secure seats and wheel chair tie-downs to the floor do not comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 222. school Bus Passenger Seating: 16 .. Production Dates: 7195-4/96 Model(s): Saf-T-Liner Involved: 55 Recall :\\umber \u0026amp; Description 97\\'-020 The brake system does nm met!t stopping distance requiremer. of r-t:deral \\lotor \\' ehicle Safety Standard \\:o. 121. _.\\ir Brake Systems. WA Y'.'iE WHEELED YEHICLES/HARSCO CORPORATION (717) 763-7064 Production Dates: 9193-5195 lmolved: 235 Model(s): Lifestar Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 96V-133 The fuel tank barrier collapsed during impact test resulting in a failure to meet the requirements of Federal '.'vlmor Vehicle Safety Standard \\:o. 301. -rue! \\ystem lntc,\nrity . 17 SCHOOL BUS VEHICLE RECALLS FROM JANUARY 1992 THROUGH APRIL 1997 18 AMERICAN TRA:'JSPORT..\\ TIO~ CORPORATION \u0026lt;AMTRAN} \u0026lt;SQQ) 843-5615 Production Dates: 12/80-4/93 lnrnlved: 29.484 ~lodeHs): Ward'. Patriot. \u0026amp; \\'olumea Recall :'\\umber \u0026amp; Description: 93\\'-032 .002 (93001 l The dothing of a student rider can become snagged in the exit door hand rail. Production Dates: 4186-2.'96 Involved: 2.650 Model(s): Ward. Patriot. \u0026amp; \\01umeer Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 96 V-046 ( 96301) The clothing of a student rider can become snagged in the exit door hand rail. Production Dates: 4-'86-3196 Imolved: 34.900 ,todel(s): RS3302. RS3505. RS3708. RS:91 I. Patriot. \u0026amp; Volunteer Recall '.\\umber \u0026amp; Description: ufJ \\'-0-+ i 196302 l The clothing of a ~rudtm ridtr can become snagged in the e\\lt door hand rail. Production Dates: l '87- 10/9-+ lmolved: 661 ,todel(s): Genesis \u0026amp; Ward Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 94\\'-195 (94003) The certification labels for the tires installed on these vehicles contained incomplete information on both tire and wheel rim sizes and therefore do not meet the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 120. Tire Selection and Rims for Vehicles Other Than Passenger Cars.\"' Production Dates: 1/91-3/96 Model(s): Genesis Involved: 5,800 Recall ~umber \u0026amp; Description: 06V-048 (96303) The clothing of a srudem rider can become snagged in the exit door hand rail. Production Dates: 1/91-1/97 Involved: 2.480 Model(s): Volunteer Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 97V-0 14 (9730 l) The clothing of a student rider can become snagged in the exit door hand rail. Production Dates: 11/91-7/92 Involved: 94 Model(s): Genesis Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 92V-102.001 (92506) The fuel tank was punctured during compliance testing and therefore the fuel system does not meet the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 301. Tuel System Integrity .\" 19 Production Dates: 11/91-10/94 Involved: 3 .421 \\1odel(s): Genesis Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 9-+V-208 (94509) The locking washer for the rear axle bearing was Iiot installed correctly. Production Dates: 11 !91-10:' 9-+ \\1odel(s): Genesis Imohed: I .1 79 Recall :'\\umber \u0026amp; Description: \u0026lt;)-+ \\' -23.i-00 1 (945111 The brake pressure warning light may come on when there is not a brake pressure problem. Production Dates: 11/92-5/93 Involved: 2.473 Model(s): Genesis. Vanguard. \u0026amp; Volunteer Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 93V-109 193002) The rear emergency exit door is missing an emergenc exit label and therefore does not meer the re'-luirements uf rcuer::ii \\lotor \\'d1ick ~afety Standard ~o . .:: 17 ... Bus \\\\'indo\\, Retention L1nc.i Rekas.:. Production Dates: I I .'92-12.'93 :\\fodel(s): Genesis lmohed: 1.378 Recall :'\\umber \u0026amp; Description: \u0026lt;13\\\"-201-001 (93508) The hand thronle cable and rhe accelerator rod can become intertwined due ro a misalignment. possibly causing an unintended full throttle acceleration. Production Dates: 12/92-6/93 Involved: 137 Model(s): Genesis Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 93-029.005 (93506) The Allied Signal brake master cylinders have a gap between the master cylinder and the remote brake fluid reservoir adapter. Production Dates: 1 l.'93-5i94 Involved: 58 :\\lodel(s): Genesis Recall :'\\umber \u0026amp; Description: 94V-095 (94504) The brake fluid put into rhese vehicles during production was found to be contaminated. Production Dates: 3/95-1/97 Involved: 1.473 Model(s): RS. RC. \u0026amp; RE Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 97V-048 (97501) The power steering return hose can crackdue to power steering fluid expansion during cold weather. Production Dates: 5/95-10/95 Involved: 495 Model(s): Genesis. Vanguard. \u0026amp; Volunteer Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 95V-206 (95301) The rearview mirror system on these buses does not meet the viewing area requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard '.\\Jo. 111. --RearYiew ~lirrors.  - 20 .. AMERICAN TRA'.'JSPORTATIO~ CORPORATION (AMTRAN} (800} 843-5615 Production Dates: 12/80-4-'93 Involved: 29.484 :\\lodel(s): Ward. Patriot. \u0026amp; \\'olumecr Recall :\\umber \u0026amp; Description: 93\\'-032.002 (93001) The clolhing of J slUdcm rider can become snagged in lhe exil door hand rail. Production Dates: 4186-2,'96 Involved: 2.650 Model(s): Ward. Patriot. \u0026amp; \\olumeer Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 96V-046 (96301) The clothing of a student rider can become snagged in the exit door hand rail. Production Dates: 4/86-3.'96 Inrnhed: 34.900 \\lodeHsl: RS3302. RS3505. RS370S. RS:91 l. P:imot. \u0026amp; \\'nlunteer Recall '.\\umber \u0026amp; Description: \"fi \\' -0-+ 7 196302 l The clothing of a slUdcnt rider c:rn hecome snagged in lhe exH door hand rail. Production Dates: I '87- l 0, 9-+ lnrnlved: 661 Model\u0026lt;s): Genesis \u0026amp; Ward Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 94 V- l 95 (94003) The certification labels for the lires installed on these vehicles contained incomplete information on both tire and wheel rim sizes and therefore do not meet the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. l 20 . .. Tire Selection ~d Rims for Vehicles Other Than Passenger Cars. Production Dates: l/91-3/96 Model(s): Genesis Involved: 5,800 Recall ~umber \u0026amp; Description: %V-048 (96303) The clothing of a srudem rider can become snagged in the exit door hand rail. Production Dates: I /91-1 /97 Involved: 2.480 Model(s): Volunteer Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 97V-0 14 (97301) The clothing of a student rider can become snagged in the exit door hand rail. Production Dates: 11/91-7 /92 Involved: 94 Model(s): Genesis Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 92.V-102.001 (92506) The fuel tank was punctured during compliance testing and therefore the fuel system does not meet the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 301. -rue! System Integrity ... 19 Production Dates: 11/91-10/94 Involved: 3 .421 Model(s): Genesis Recall :\\'umber \u0026amp; Description: 9-l\\'-208 (94509) The locking washer for the rear axle bearing was riot installed correctly. Production Dates: 11 191-10:'9-+ Model(s): Genesis Imol\\'ed: 1.179 Recall :\\umber \u0026amp; Description: 0-l\\'-23-+-001 1945111 The brake pressure warning light may come on when there is not a brake pressure problem. Production Dates: 11/92-5/93 Involved: 2.473 Model(s): Genesis. Vanguard. \u0026amp; Volunteer Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 93 V-109 (93002 l The rear emergency exit door is missing an emergenc exit label and therefore Joes not meet the reljuiremems of f..:Jerai :Vlntor \\\"..:hick :-iakty Standard \\:o . .:: 17. -1~us \\\\ \"111Jo,, Retention ,mo R..:kast.: ... Production Dates: 1 l 92-12.'93 \\lodel(s): Genesis lnrnhed: 1.378 Recall :\\umber \u0026amp; Description: \u0026lt;13\\ -201-00I (93508) The hand thronle cable and the accelerator rod can become intertwined due ro a misalignment. possibly causing an unintended full throttle A acceleration. W Production Dates: 12/92-6/93 Involved: 137 Model(s): Genesis Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 93E-029.005 (93506) The Allied Signal brake master cylinders have a gap between the master cylinder and the remote brake fluid reservoir adapter. Production Dates: 11 93_5 ,-94 Involved: 58 \\lodel(s): Genesis Recall '.\\umber \u0026amp; Description: 94V-095 (94504) The brake fluid put into these vehicles during production was found to be contaminated. Production Dates: 3/95-1/97 Model(s): RS. RC. \u0026amp; RE Involved: 1.4 73 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 97V-048 (97501) The power steering return hose can crackdue to power steering fluid expansion during cold weather. Production Dates: 5/95-10/95 Involved: 495 Model(s): Genesis, Vanguard. \u0026amp; Volunteer Recall :\\'umber \u0026amp; Description: 95\\'-206 (95301) The rearview mirror system on these buses does not meet the viewing area requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard \u0026gt;lo. 111 . .. Rear\\'iew :--..1irrors ... 20 Production Dates: 5/95-3/96 Involved: 488 .\\1odel(s): RS3302. RS3505. RS3708 . \u0026amp; RS391 I Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 96 V- I 34 \u0026lt; 96304) The rear window buzzer could fail to activate when the rear window is unlatched as required hy Federal .\\lotor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 217 ... Bus \\\\ \"inJm, Retention :rnci Rekasc.  Production Dates: 5/96-10/96 .\\lodel(s): RS3302. RS3505. \u0026amp; RS3708 Involved: 194 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 96V-221 \u0026lt;96306) The wrong lubricant was used m the parking brake air chambers during production. ***************************************************************************** BLCE BIRD BODY CO.\\IP...\\:\\Y \u0026lt;912) 825-9608 Production Dates: 4-T7-7 96 Inrnived: 10.969 \\1odel(s): All American Recall :\\umber \u0026amp; Description: %\\\"-112 1R96BK) The amount of fuel leaked from the fuel system during a vehicle crash exceeds the amount allowed by Federal i'\\lotor \\' ehick Safety Standard No. 301. \"fuel System lnregrity :  Production Dates: 8/79-7 /88 Involved: 63.812 Model(s): SBCV Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 95V-187 (R95AV) The clothing of a student rider can become snagged in the exit door hand rail. Production Dates: 1/80-3/96 Imolved: 18.000 .\\lodel(s): All Star. Comentional. .\\lighty .\\lite . .\\linorour. S\n.lli.:t\\- f-Liner. \u0026amp; \\ista Recall :'\\umber \u0026amp; Description: 96 V-073 \u0026lt; R96BG) The clothing of a student rider can become snagged in the exit door hand rail. Production Dates: 3/80-3.192 Involved: 20.825 Model(s): All American \u0026amp; TC2000 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 93V-032 (R93AB) The clothing of a student rider can become snagged in the exit door hand rail. Production Dates: 3/80-4/95 Involved: 27. 189 Model(s): All American \u0026amp; TC2000 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 95V-090 \u0026lt;R95AS) The clothing of a student rider can become snagged in the exit door hand rail. 21 Production Dates: 1/88-6/95 :\\1odel(s): CSFE. STFE. \u0026amp; TC.2000 Involved: 409 Recall :\\'.umber \u0026amp; Description: 95V- l 36 \u0026lt; R95A T) The welds used to attach the steel weight plates m the rear of the bus are not strong enough. Production Dates: 8/91-12.'91 .\\lodel(s}: TC2000 Involved: -+0 Recall ~umber \u0026amp; Description: 92\\'-1)85 \u0026lt; R92AR) The steering arm can coma1.:t and interfere with the proper operation of the from air brake automatic slack adjuster. Production Dates: 11/91-3/94 Model(s): CSFE. QBFE. \u0026amp; TCFE Involved: 6. 704 Recall ~umber \u0026amp; Description: 9-+ V- I 36 ( R94AD) The hand throttle cable can become wedged inside tl at.:celerator rod assembly possibl, causin!:! he acceler:.nor to remain in an uncontrolled full [hronk condition. Production Dates: 7 '92-5. q3 :\\1odel(s}: TC.2000 lnvolHd: 165 Recall '.'lumber \u0026amp; Description: 93E-029.003 (R93AM) The Allied Signal brake master cylinders have\ngap between the master cylinder :.md the remote brake fluid reservoir adapter. A Production Dates: 1/93-1/95 Involved: 108 W Model(s): CS. QB. \u0026amp; TC2000 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 96V-068 (R96BD) The air suspension torque arm can come into contact with and possibly fracture the air brake chamber S-CAM mounting bracket. Production Dates: 9/94-9195 Involved: 4.590 '.\\.1odel(s): All American. GMC\\'. GPWB. MBWB. SBCV. VCTA. \u0026amp; TC2000 Recall :\\umber \u0026amp; Description: .15\\'- I SO (R95AU) The clothing of a student rider can become snagged in the exit door hand rail. Production Dates: 9/94-2/96 Model(s): GMCV \u0026amp; SBCV Involved: 203 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 96V-078 (R96BC) The clothing of a student rider can become snagged in the exit door hand rail. Production Dates: 1/95 Involved: 2.304 Model(s): All American. GMCV. GPWB. MBWB. SBCV. TC2000. \u0026amp; Vista Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 95\\l-051 (R95AP) The aisle side knee pads are not wide enough and therefore do not meet the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 222. School Bus Passenger Seating. ..  - ..,.., Production Dates: l:'95- I 2!95 \\lodel(s): TC2000 \u0026amp; CSFE Involved: 12 Recall :\\'umber \u0026amp; Description: 96 \\\"- I 32 ( R96BJ) The hydraulic brake hoses can leak t1uid as a result 1)f coming in contact with various air ~uspension system components. Production Dates: 2.'95-3 95 Involved: 307 \\lodel(s1: GMC\\'. SBC\\'. \\\"CTA. \u0026amp; TC2000 Recall :\\'umber \u0026amp; Description: 96V-0l l rR96BAl The wrong circuit breaker was installed in the electrical panel uuring production. Production Dates: 5/95-11/95 Involved: 117 Model(s): All American. CSRE. SBCV. \u0026amp; TC:!000 Recall :\\'umber \u0026amp; Description: 96V-023 rR96BB) The proper operation of some emergency window ex could he hinuereu hy imerrerence h:t\\\\een 1he ,xindow latch and a aluminum 1rim piece and therefore rcsuJts in a failure It) comp1y ,, 11h I c:Jerai \\ lo!L)r \\d1ide Salcty :-itanuard \\n. ::.1,. --l3us \\\\.inJo,, Reten1ion ami Rc:k:.i:--c:. Production Dates: 6 95-6:95 \\lodel(s): .--\\II American \u0026amp; TC.2000 lnvol-ved: 57 Recall :\\'umber \u0026amp; Description: 95V-l 90 \u0026lt;R95A W) The wrong adhesive mix was applied to the interior side panel joints during production resulting in a failure to comply with joint strength requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 221.  School Bus Body Joint Strength ... Production Dates: 8/95-12/95 Involved: 327 Model(s): AAFE. All American. TCFE. \u0026amp; TC2000 Recall :\\'umber \u0026amp; Description: 96V-012 rR96BC) The clothing of a srudem rider can become snagged in 1he exit door hand rail. Production Dates: 5.96-7,96 Involved: 5 .Model(s): TC:!000 \u0026amp; QB Recall :\\'umber \u0026amp; Description: 96V-!98 \u0026lt;R96BN) The electric powertrain drive motor rotors are the wrong size. Production Dates: 5/96-8/96 Involved: 142 Model(s): TC2000. All American. CSRE. \u0026amp; QB Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 96V-180 (R96BL) The power steering hoses were incorrectly manufactured. CARPENTER MANUF ACTt,:RING. I'.'.C./CROW~ COACH Production Dates: 2/86-9/89 :\\-lodel(s): SCL-1801 (812) 849-3131 Involved: 16 Recall ~umber \u0026amp; Description: )2\\'-tJU The huses exceed the specified chassis weight and therefore do not meet the stopping d istam.:i: reljUJrements of F cdi:r~i :\\1otor Vehicli: Safety ~tandard :\\o. I 05. Hydraulic Brake System. Production Dates: 7 /87--V9 I lnvoh'ed: 872 :\\1odel(s): School Bus Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 94V-237 The bus floors can be damaged by water seepage. Production Dates: 5/90-11/92 \\lodel{s): Cadet. Classic. \u0026amp; CLtssmate Involved: 8.950 Recall ~umber \u0026amp; Description: '::13\\'-()32.003 The clothing ot a student mier can hecome snagged in the ex it door hand rail. Production Dates: 5/90-11 95 Involved: 20.950 \\lodel(s): Cadet. Classic .... \\: Cbssm:.ite Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 96 V-0-1-2 The clothing of a student rider can become snagged in the A exit door hand rail. W Production Dates: 5190-5196 Involved: 3,382 Model(s): Cadet. Classic. Counselor. \u0026amp; Classmate Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 96V-097 The clothing of a student rider can become snagged in the exit door hand rail. Production Dates: I.'92-12 .'92 \\fodel(s): Crown Coach Involved: 101 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 96V- I 68 The wrong electric fuel pump motor was installed during production . Production Dates: 5/94-6/96 Involved: 28 Model(s): School Bus \u0026amp; Classmate II Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 96V-162.001 The fuel tank was punctured during compliance testing resulting in a failure to meet the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 301. Fuel System Integrity . 24 4 Production Dates: 6/95-11195 :\\lodel\u0026lt;s): Classic \u0026amp; Counselor Involved: 451 Recall ~umber \u0026amp; Description: 95\\'-220 The wrong type of bolt was used to auach the drivers seat safety heir anchorage resulting in failure 10 comply with Fi:deral \\lotor Vehicle Satery Standard '(o . .:::\\)9. saferv Belt .\\ssi:mblies ... COACH AND EQUIP'.\\IE~T ,1A~l'F ACTCRI~G CORPORATION \u0026lt;315} 536-2321 Production Dates: l /80-12/92 Involved: 2.671 Model(s): Fonibus \u0026amp; Fonivan Recall '.\\umber \u0026amp; Description: 93V-032.005 The clothing of a srudem rider can become snagged in the t:xit Joor hand rad. Production Dates: L80-3.96 '.\\lodel(sl: Fonibus \u0026amp; Fortt\\'an Involved: 2.659 Recall :\\umber \u0026amp; Description: lJf, V-1 l62 The clothing. t'f a srndem rider can hecome snagged in the exit Joor hand rail. COLLINS BUS CORPORATION Production Dates: 11/85-5/93 Model(s): Bantam (316) 662-9000 Involved: 2.833 Recall ~umber \u0026amp; Description: 93V-032.006 The clothing of a srudem rider can become snagged in the ex.11 door hand rail. ELDORADO NATIONAL (800) 338-3211 Production Dates: 8/92-5/93 Involved: 40 Model(s): Escon RE Recall ~umber \u0026amp; Description: 93E-029.006 The Allied Signal brake master cylinders have a gap between the master cylinder and the remote brake fluid reservoir adapter. 25 FORD \\IOTOR COMPA'.'/Y Production Dates: 9/86-3 194 '.\\.lodel(s): B600 \u0026amp; B700 (800} 392-3673 Involved: 6.206 Recall :\\umber \u0026amp; Description: ,q \\ ' -1156 1 lJ-+SS3 \\ The hanery powered electrical junction box mounted ,m the right fender apron can he Jama~eJ hy corrosion. Production Dates: l l.-'87-G -92 '.\\.lodel(s): B600 \u0026amp; B700 lmohed: 16.834 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 9-+V-l 18 (9-+S86) The steering gear snap ring grovt was improperly machined during production. Production Dates: 8/93-10/93 ImolHd: 106 \\lodel(sl: E350. Econoline. ~ Schooi Bus cha~si~ Recall :\\umber \u0026amp; Description: '-J3\\--19-+ 193S771 The appi1cauon turce neeueJ t11 ~et the loot 11perated parking hrake exceeJs the l1lrce allo\\\\ed by FeJerai \\tutor \\\"chick ~..ilety Standard \\!o. I 05. \"\"l-lydraulic l3rakc S~ ~tern . GENERAL :\\IOTORS CORPORA TI0:\\1 {G'.\\.1) (800) 222-1020 Production Dates: 3/89-9/92 Involved: 6,669 Model(s): Chevrolet B6 \u0026amp; B7 and GMC B6 \u0026amp; B7 school bus chassis Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 92V-l 87 (93C05) The throttle body injector can disengage from the throltle drive shaft possibly causing an uncontrollable full throllle condition . Production Dates: -+ 92 --+ 93 Invohed: 729 \\lodel(s): Chevrolet/GMC B7 ~chool bus chassis Recall ~umber \u0026amp; Description 93 V-171 (93C 17) The brake pedal push rod can disengage from the bra~ booster. Production Dates: l /93-5/93 Involved: 9,681 Model(s): Chevrolet/GMC B7. C6. C7. P6. Kodiak. \u0026amp; Topkick school bus chassis Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 94V-028 (93C19) The pinch bolts used to assemble the intennediate steering shaft could be loose or missing. ***************************************************************************** 26 GILLIG CORPORATION Production Dates: 1 /86-6193 \\lodel(s): Phantom (510} 785-1500 Involved: 372 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 93\\'-032.007 The clothing of a srudent rider c:m become snagged in the exit door hand rail. GIRARDIN. INC. Production Dates: 1/89-12/94 '.\\fodel(s): MBI 1 \u0026amp; SBI000 (819) 477-3222 Involved: 386 Recall :\\umber \u0026amp; Description 95V- ! 20 The ciothing ol a student rider can become snagged in the exit Joor hand rail. LES E:\\'TERPRISES/:\\IICHEL CORBEIL. I~C. Production Dates: 5/86-6195 Involved: 250 Model(s): Minibus Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 96V-076 The clothing of a student rider can become snagged in the exit door hand rail. ***************************************************************************** ,no BL1S. I~C. (419) 358-2500 Production Dates: 1/88-6/93 Involved: 2.826 Model(s): Superior Recall Number \u0026amp; Description: 96V-169 The clothing of a srudent rider can become snagged in the exit door hand rail. ***************************************************************************** 27 NAVISTAR INTER1'/ATIONAL TRANSPORTATION CORP (800} 448~ 7825 Production Dates: 9/78-5/87 Involved: 145.682 \\-lodel(s): 1-l00. 1600. 1700. 1800. 1900. \u0026amp; 2100 series Recall ~umber \u0026amp; Description 92Y-153 \u0026lt;92507) The saginaw steering gear rails to adequately relieve pressure on the pitman arm splines \\\\'hen the \\\\ heels are _fully .-turned against the axle stops. Production Dates: 9178-, 92 Im-olved: 185.177 .Model(s): 1700. 1800. 3600. 3700. 3800. \u0026amp; 3900 series Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 92V- l 02 (92506) The fuel tank was puncrured during compliance test in\nand therefore the fuel system does not meet the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 30 I. Fuel System Integrity_- Production Dates: l I '78-2 :'92 \\lodells): School Bus Chassis Involved: 11.346 Recall :\\'umber \u0026amp; Description 92\\\"-1)20 (92502) The amount of gasoline 1ns1 Junng compliance tests exceeded the amount ::illowed t,y r-.:dcral \\1otor Vehicle Safety Standard '-:o. 301. Tud System Integrity . Production Dates: 1 '81-8/94 Involved: 171.638 Model(s): 1723. 1753. 1823. 1853. 3600. 3700. \u0026amp; 3800 - Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 96V- l 92 (96507) The rurn signal lever could be difficult to operate due to res is ta nee. Production Dates: 2/82-4/82 Model(s): 1723 \u0026amp; 1853 Involved: 588 Recall '.'lumber \u0026amp; Description 96 Y-096 ( 96502) The rear axles on these huses \\\\ere incorrectly welded during production. Production Dates: 6/88-3 /91 Model\u0026lt;s): 3700 \u0026amp; 3800 Involved: 21. 742 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 95V-127 (95506) The hand throttle cable wire can wear through a plastic grommet in the accelerator rod possibly resulting in the accelerator sticking at the full power position. Production Dates: 1 /90-3/93 Involved: 193 Model(s): 1652, 3600. 3700. 3800. 3900. 4700. \u0026amp; 4900 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 93 Y-092 (93504) The pressure relief valve was omitted on the air tank for the air suspension system. 28 Production Dates: 9/90-12/91 :\\todel(s): 3900FC Involved: 1.184 Recall '.'lumber \u0026amp; Description 92V-096 \u0026lt; 92505) The power steering hose \\\\'as incorrectly routed during production. Production Dates: 9 190-9193 Model(s): 3900 lm-olved: 1.050 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 93V-201 (93508) The hand throule cable and the acceleracor rod can become intertwined due to a misalignment possibly causing an unintended full throttle acceleration. Production Dates: 3/91-10/91 :\\-todel(s): 3600. 3700. 3800. \u0026amp; 3900 Involved: 10.629 Recall :\\umber \u0026amp; Description \u0026lt;}3\\'-112 (935051 The bolts used to actach the ruel wnk case to the \\'ehicle frame were inscalkJ incorrect!\\. Production Dates: 591-3 93 :\\todel(s): 3900FC lnvolwd: 62 Recall :\\umber \u0026amp; Description 94\\'-234 \u0026lt;945111 The brake pressure warnmg light may come on when there is not a brake pressure problem. Production Dates: 11/91-9/93 Involved: 942 Model(s): 3600 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 93V-188 (93507) The steel hydraulic brake lines which connect the brake master cylinder to the vehicle frame can develop fatigue cracks due co venical flexing. Production Dates: 11/91-2 '94 :\\lodel(s): 3600 Involved: 745 Recall ~umber \u0026amp; Description 95V-l 79 (95512) The alternator belt can rub against the fuel hose connected co the fuel filter possibly resulting in a fuel leaking from the fuel hose. Production Dates: 1/92-9/96 Involved: 580 Model(s): 3600, 3800. \u0026amp; 3900 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 96V- l 74 (96505) The anti-lock brake sensor wires could have been misrouted to the wrong wheel or brake sensor during production. Production Dates: 7 /92-5/93 Model(s): 3900FC Involved: 4 ' Recall '.'lumber \u0026amp; Description 93E-029.004 (93506) The Allied Signal brake master cylinders have a gap between the master cylinder and the remote brake fluid reservoir adapter. 29 Production Dates: 3/93-2/96 \\fodel(s): 3800 \u0026amp; 4000 Involved: 206 Recall ~umber \u0026amp; Description '-J6V-041 ( 9650 l l The from wheel hub can develop fatigue cracks at the mouming stud connection p0ims. Production Dates: 1 '94-3 ,'94 Involved: 373 \\lodel(s): 2554. 3600. 3800. -+\"700 . 4800. 4900. \u0026amp; 8100 Recall :'.\\umber \u0026amp; Description 94 \\'-14-+ \u0026lt;94508) The four compression backplate retaining fasteners for the turbo charger were not torqued to specifications during production. Production Dates: l /94-6/94 Involved: 6,449 Model(s): 2574. 2674. 3600. 4700. 8100. \u0026amp; 8200 Recall :'.\\umber \u0026amp; Description LJ4V-l96 \u0026lt;94507) The accelerator hase can crack due to bein!! attached 10 a fire wall of insutliciem \u0026lt;\n1renrth r,1 \\\\'ith ~t:i.nd acceleration torces. Production Dates: 2.'94-5 44 \\lodel(s): 3800 lnvohed: 2.708 Recall :'.\\umber \u0026amp; Description ~Ll. \\. - 13 3 , 94505) The h0t10m of the accelerator pedal can lodge againsr the head of one of the bolts that attaches the transmission cover to the hus tloor possibly preventing the accelerator fr0m returning to a full idle position. Production Dates: 3195-6195 Model(s): 3600 \u0026amp; 3800 Involved: 2.238 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 95V- l 56 (95509) The chassis vin number is incorrect resulting in a failure to comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 115. '\"Vehicle Identification :---Jumber. Production Dates: 2. 96-6 % \\fodel(s): 4 700 Involved: 232 Recall ~umber \u0026amp; Description 96 V-154 (96504) The rube portion of the stet:ring column was welded incorrectly during production. Production Dates: 5/96-11 /96 Model(s): 3800 Involved: 727 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 96 V-239 \u0026lt;96509) The accelerator pedal could catch on the floor edge which could prevent the pedal from returning to the idle position . 30 .. Production Dates: 9/96-10/96 Involved: 233 Model(s): 3800. -l-700. -l-900. 8100. 8200. 9200. \u0026amp; 9400 Recall :'.\\umber \u0026amp; Description 96\\'-2-1-0 (%510) The rear axle assemblies were improperly heat treate( Juring production. OSHKOSH TRCCK CORPORA TIO~ Production Dates: 7 /91-8/93 Model(s): SB30FD-D (414) 235-1726 Involved: 611 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 93V-142 The cap screws that connect the intermediate steering linkages to the steering gear hox shafts were improperly torqued during production. Production Dates: 7 92-5 g3 Inrnived: 1.026 .\\lodel\u0026lt;s): Yarious schoL1l hus chassis Recall :'.\\umber \u0026amp; Description 93E-029 001 The Allied Signal brake mastt:r cylinders have a gap hetween the master cylinder and the remote hrake tluid reservoir adapter. SPARTAN MOTORS. INC Production Dates: 10/95-1/96 Model(s): SB (800) 722-3025 Involved: 52 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 96V-052 The wrong fan clutch was installed on the engine cooling fan during production. SUPERIOR/SHELLER GLOBE BUSES/UNITED TECH:'.\\OLOGIES \u0026lt;313} 240-8656 Production Dates: unavailable Involved: 20.000 Model(s): School Bus Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 96V-079 The clothing of a student rider can become snagged in the exit door hand rail. ************************************************************************ 31 STURDICORP/US Bus Manufacturing, Inc. Production Dates: 1/80-12/93 \\lodel(s): Srurdibus \u0026amp; Srurdivan (914) 357-2510 Involved: 3.690 Recall ~umber \u0026amp; Description 93\\'-032.008 The clothing Ll f a student rider c:m become snagged in the exit door hand rail . Production Dates: I 0/86-1 O, 93 lmolved: 2. 991 \\fodel(s): Srurdibus \u0026amp; Sturdivan Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 96V-205 The clothing of a srudent rider can become snagged in the exit door hand rail. Production Dates: l /95-9196 Inrnlved: 616 \\lodel(s): Sturdibu~ . Ll!.!le. ~ l 'niverse Recall ~umber \u0026amp; Description %\\'-206 The clothing \\ \\J a student rider can hecome snagged in the exi1 Jo0r hand rail. Production Dates: l 95-9 96 \\lodel(s): Eagle Involved: 89 Recall ~umber \u0026amp; Description 96V-162.003 The fuel tank \\Vas puncrured during compliance testingA resulting in a failure to meet the requirements of Federal \\1otor Vehicle Safety Standard No.  301, .. Fuel System Integrity. **************************************************************************** THOMAS BUILT BUSES, INC. (910} 889-4871 Production Dates:  77- l 92 lmolved: 79 .216 \\1odel(s): All Star. Conventional. Minotour. MVP. Mighty Mite . Saf-T-Liner. \u0026amp; Vista Recall :\\'.umber \u0026amp; Description 93V-032.001 The clothing of a student rider can become snagged in the exit door hand rail. Production Dates: 4/77- 1/92 Involved: 4 .500 Model(s): All Star. Conventional. Minocour. MVP. Mighty Mite. Saf-T-Liner. \u0026amp; Vista Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 96V-054 The clothing of a student rider can become snagged in the exit door hand rail. Production Dates: 4/77-3 /96 Involved: 116.933 \\1odel(s): All Star. Conventional. Minotour. MVP. ~1ighcy Mite. Saf-T-Liner. \u0026amp; Vista I, Recall ~umber \u0026amp; Description 96V-080 The clothing of a student rider can become snagged in the exit door hand rail. ' ...,. ...., - Production Dates: -l/77-7/96 Involved, 120.162 Model(s): All Star. Conventional. Minotaur. MVP. Mighty Mite. Saf-T-Liner. \u0026amp; Vista Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 96V- l 39 The clothing of a student rider can become snagged in the e:ti door control rod assembly. Production Dates: 9\n73_ 7 92 \\fodel(s): School Bus Involved: 42. 97 I Recall :\\umber \u0026amp; Description 92\\'-102.002 The fuel tank was punctured during compliance testing aIJ therefore the fuel system does not meet the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard ~o. 301. -rue! System Integrity. Production Dates: 10/80-1 /92 Model(s): Bus \u0026amp; School Bus Involved: 6.248 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 92V-0 13 The actuator that releases the two catches for the rear emergency push-out window cm fail to function \\vhen needed due to poor maintenance. lack of iubrication. and/or corrosion . Production Dates: 9188-1,96 \\lodel(s): Saf-T-Liner lmohed: 730 Recall ~umber \u0026amp; Description %\\'-021 The brake chamber can be damaged due to contact with the suspension beam. Production Dates: 9/88-1/96 Involved: 695 Model(s): Saf-T-Liner Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 97V-030 The suspension beam can contact and damage the brake chamb, clamp band. Production Dates: 10/88-8192 \\lodel(s1: Bus \u0026amp; School Bus Involved: 277 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 92V- l 20 The welds which join the drive shaft to various engine and transmission components could be faulty . Production Dates: 11/89-1/93 Involved: 24.629 Model(s): All Star. Citiliner. Conventional. Mighty Mite. Minotaur. MVP, Saf-T-Liner, Vista. \u0026amp; School Bus Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 93V-013 The bus windows fail to meet the glass retention requirements of Federal i\\lotor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 217. \"Bus Window Retention and Release.'' 33 Production Dates: 6/90-8/93 Involved: 336 Model(s): All Star \u0026amp; Type D Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 93 V-l-+2-001 The cap screws rhat connect the intermediate steering - linkages 10 the steering gear hox shafts \\\\ere improperly torqued during production. Production Dates: l .'91-919-l Imolved: 804 :\\fodel(s): Vista Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 95\\'-041 The bracket used to support the hydraulic brake line can crack due to stress and possibly sever the brake line . Production Dates: 2/91-12/92 Model(s): Bus \u0026amp; School Bus Involved: 188 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 93V-029 The safety helt anchorage bolts were not large enough ro sustain specified load requirements during compliance resting and therefore Jo nor meet the requirements of F~J~ral \\ llllor , Lhick \\\n_ifct~ :-,\ntano:ird :\\ (1 . .:: : 0. satety lklt . \\ ~scrnhly . \\ nchor:iges.  Production Dates: 7.'91-2 '96 \"lodel(s): Conventional lmolved: 30.435 Recall :\\'umber \u0026amp; Description 96 \\' - I 05 The c.:lothing of a studem rider can become snagged in the a door hand rail.  Production Dates: 7 /91-2/96 Involved: 24,082 Model(s): Conventional Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 97V-031 The clothing of a student rider can become snagged in the exi door hand rail. Production Dates: 12.'91-8 92 Model(s): Bus \u0026amp; School Bus Involved: 1.684 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 92V-126 The wrong screws were used to attach the seat backs to the seat frames during production . Production Dates: 1/92-3/92 Model(s): Bus \u0026amp; School Bus Involved: 24 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 92V-078 The incorrect installation of the air brake lines during production could cause the brakes to self-apply without warning to the driver. Production Dates: 1/92-7/96 Involved: 2.068 :vlodel(s): MVP. All Star. \u0026amp; Saf-T-Liner Recall '.'lumber \u0026amp; Description 96 V-164 The clothing of a student rider can become snagged in the exit door hand rail. e' 34 Production Dates: 2.'92-3/96 Involved: 37.717 :\\fodel(s): All Star. Convemional. Minorour . .\\1VP. Saf-T-Liner. \u0026amp; Vista Recall :\\umber \u0026amp; Description 96V-065 The clothing of a srudem rider can become snagged in the ex door hand rail . Production Dates: 7 92-.5 93 \\lodelm: .\\II Star Inrnlved: 164 Recall :\\umber \u0026amp; Description 93E-U29.002 The Allied Si~nai brake master cylinders have a gap berneen the master cy I ind er :rnc..i the remote hrake fluid reser\\'oir adapter. Production Dates: 8/92-6/96 Imolved: 400 Model(s): Minorour Recall '.'Jumber \u0026amp; Description 96V-162.002 The fuel rank was punctured during compliance resting resulting in a failure{\\) meet the requiremems of Federal \\1otor \\'ehick S::it~ty Standard No. ~()l. !uei System lntesmY ... Production Dates: 9 92--\n03 \\lodel(s): School Bus lnvohed: 305 Recall :\\umber \u0026amp; Description ':13 \\'- I 35 The driver does nor hear a continuous or imerminer!t audible ~ound signal when the switch that pre\\ents the automatic extension of the stop signal arm is acti\\'ated as required by Federai \\1otor \\'ehicle Safety Standard No. 131.  School Bus Pedestrian Safety Devices. Production Dates: 9/92-7 /94 lnvohed: 1,040 Model(s): Saf-T-Liners \u0026amp; Transit-Lners Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 94V-1-B The hydraulic assist for the power steering can stop during hard turns if the hydraulically driven engine cooling fan shuts off during the turn. Production Dates: b, 93-1' 0-l Involved: 3.076 \\lodeHsJ: Conventional. '.\\1\\.P. Saf-T-Liner. ~ \\'ista Recall :\\umber \u0026amp; Description 9.5\\'-004 The safety heir retractor housing can become deformed. causing the safer., belt to become inoperative. Production Dates: 8/93-12.194 lnvohed: 1.413 Model(s): Citiliner. MVP. \u0026amp; Saf-T-Liner Recall ~umber \u0026amp; Description 95\\'-148 The automatic transmission will nor shift imo low gear due to a misalignment of the PRNDL indicator. 35 Production Dates: 11/93-3/94 Invoh'ed: 129 '.\\1odel(s): Minotour Recall '.':umber \u0026amp; Description 94 V-059 The s3.fely bell anchorages do not meel the strength requirements of Federal \\1otor Vehick Safety Standard :\\o. 210. safety Belt .\\ssembly .\"..nchorages. Production Dates: 11/93-1 L 94 \\fodel\u0026lt;s): Vista Involved: 2.133 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 95V-040 The heater \\ ems do nm have covers which would prevent trash from entering the vem area and causing a fire. Production Dates: 1/94-2/95 Involved: 50 :\\1odel(s): All Star. Conventional. Saf-T-Liner. \u0026amp; Vista Recall :\\umber \u0026amp; Description 95\\\"-042 The :iir conditioning hose vem covers Jo nm meet the head impau requiremcms ot fec.kr:.ii \\h)!L)r \\ '.:h1..:i.: Safety Standard :\\1). 2::. \"S..:honi 13us Passenger S.:ating. Production Dates: 2/94-6/94 \\lodel(s): Bus \u0026amp; School Bus lmolved: 360 Recall '.'lumber \u0026amp; Description 94V-120 The lemporary bypass cable for the neulral start switch may A not have been removed from the bus prior to delivery to the owner. W Production Dates: 3/94-9/94 Involved: 1,458 Model(s): School Bus Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 94V-214 The bus engine can still be started if the rear emergency exit door is locked. resulting in a failure to comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 217. Bus Windo\" Retention and Rele:ise ... Production Dates: 5.'94-8/94 Involved: 266 Model(s): Conventional. Minotour. \u0026amp; Vista Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 94 V-171 The location of the emergency ,~xit signs does not meet the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard \u0026gt;Jo. 217. Bus Window Retention and Release: Production Dates: 6/94-8/95 Model(s): MVP-EF Involved: 221 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 95V-170 The positive battery cable can be melted by heat from the air discharge line. 36 II. I Production Dates: 6/94-8/95 :\\fodel(s): MVP-EF Involved: 259 Recall :\\umber \u0026amp; Description 95V-l 9 l The accelerator lever can bind against the engine cover possibly resulting in the accelerator remaining in the full throttle position. Production Dates: 9.194--+:95 Imolved: 350 :\\1odeHs): Conventional. Ylinocour. Saf-T-Liner. \u0026amp; Vista Recall :\\umber \u0026amp; Description 95V-087 The roof latches do not meet the requirements of Federal \\1otor Vehicle Safety Standard ~o. 217. Bus Window Retention and Release: Production Dates: l l /94-11 /96 Model(s): Saf-T-Liner Involved: 1,800 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 97Y-018 The nut that secures the main power supply unit can loosen nossibly resulting in 1he luss nr' \\ehicle rower. Production Dates: 5 95-6195 ,todel(s): Vista lmolved: 17 Recall ~umber \u0026amp; Description 95V- l35 The wrong bolts were used to att~ch the drivers seat during rroduction resulting in a failure rn comply with Federal \\fotor Vehicle Saivy Standard No. 209. safety Belt Assemblies. Production Dates: 6/95-2/96 Involved: 18 Model(s): School Bus Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 96V-189 The fittings used to secure seats and wheel chair tie-downs to the floor do not comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 222. School Bus Passenger Seating. Production Dates: 7 '95--+ 96 \\-lodel(s): Saf-T-Liner lmolved: 55 Recall :\\umber \u0026amp; Description 97V-020 The brake system does not meet stopping distance requirement~ of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 121.  . .\\ir Brake Systems: ***************************************************************************** TRANSi-CORP Production Dates: 1/90-7 / 91 :\\1odel(s): FC720 016) 662-9000 Involved: 57 Recall :\\umber \u0026amp; Description 94 V-225 The chassis frame rail can crack near the front and rear front axle spring hangers due to excessive stress. 37 VA'.\\1-CO~. I'.\\fC. (908) 356-8484 Production Dates: 1/90-12.'92 Imolved: 766 :\\lodel(s): Type A Recall :'\\umber \u0026amp; Description: 93\\'-032.00-l The clothing of a student rider can become snagged in the exit Jnnr hand raii. WA Y'.\\E WHEELED VEHICLES/HARSCO CORPORATION (717) 763-7064 Production Dates: 8/93-9/93 Involved: 40 Model(s): Chaperone \u0026amp; Lifeguard Recall :\\'umber \u0026amp; Description 93\\/-195 The emergency exit door latches were assembled using ~cand2 i1UtS instead lit l, 1ckin\u0026lt;2 nuts. Production Dates: 9 '93-5 95 ,1odel(s): Lifestar lnvohed: 235 Recall '.'iumber \u0026amp; Description '::111 \\. - i 33 The fuel tank barrier collapsed during impact test resulting in a failure to meet requ1rem..:m~ ,,( 1~Jaal \\lotor \\'ehick Satety Standard \\:o. 301. Fuel System Integrity. Production Dates: 1 /94-6/94 Involved: 19 Model(s): Lifescar Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 94V-150 The stud welds connecting the air brake supply lines to the vehicle frame can fail. possibly resulting in the air brake supply line falling on to the exhaust system. Production Dates: 2.'9-+--+- ll-+ :\\lodel(s): Lifescar lnrnlved: 13 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 94 V-112 The exhaust system clamp boles were not torqued completely during production which could allow e:-..haust gases to enter the passenger compartment. ~**************************************************************************** 38 i .J SCHOOL BUS EQUIPMENT RECALLS FROM JANUARY 1992 THROUGH APRIL 1997 39 CARPENTER MANUFACTURING. INC. (812) 849-3131 Production Dates: 5.186-2/96 Involved: 1.415 :\\Iodel(s): Carpenter \u0026amp; Wayne School Buses Recall ~umber \u0026amp; Description: 96E-007 The clothing of a student rider can become snagged in the exit door hand rail. HERCJ\nLES ENGI\n'l\nE CO:\\IPA\n'l\nY Production Dates: 6/91-3/92 Model(s): Crane Carrier Bus Chassis Production Dates: 3:92-6/94 \\lodel(s): Carpemer C uunselor Busi:~ Production Dates: b92-2.'9-+ \\lodel(s): Thomas Built Transit Bus \u0026lt;\\: School Bus Production Dates: -i, 93-10/9-+ \\fodel(s): Spartan TB22-+2 Bus Chassis Production Dates: 5 93-5 9-+ (216) 438-1390 Involved: 91 Involved: 25 lnrnln~d: 39 InrnlYed: 22 Involved: 19 .\\fodel(s): Blue Bird TCRE. QBRE. \u0026amp; CSRE Recall ~umber \u0026amp; Description 94-020 The hex bolts connecting various throttle components on - Hercules Impco GT AS .6 and GT A3. 7 engines can loosen possibly resulting in unintended full throttle acceleration. Note: Hercules Engine is conducting this recall on behalf of each subordinate manufacturer. ***************************************************************************** KI~EDY~E CORPORA TIO~ (913) 841-4000 Production Dates: 7 192-7 /93 Involved: :3 .182 Model(s): Goshen GC 11 \u0026amp; Sentry Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 94-013 The wheel chair restraint hooks may release on their own without warning while the vehicle is in motion. Note: Kinedyne is conducting this recall on behalf of Goshen Coach. ***************************************************************************** -r J WELLS ALUMI7'lXM CORPORATION Production Dates: l 2.'92-3,94 :\\fodel(s): Thomas Built School Bus \u0026amp; Bus Production Dates: I 2 .'92-3 .' 9  :\\1odel(s): Van Con School Bus Production Dates: 7 93_ 7 94 :\\fodel(s): Mid Bus Guide OW. GuiJe SW. Superior. \u0026amp; Busette Production Dates: 1.193-5.'94 Model(s): AmTran Genesis \u0026amp; Ward (410 494-4500 Inrnlnd: 5.000 Inrnhed: 30 Invoiveri: 111 Involved: 1.447 Recall Number \u0026amp; Description 94E-01 l The emergency exit window latches are not strong enough to meet the requiremems of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 217. --Bus Window Retention and Release. :'\\otc: Wells ,\\luminum 1s -.:nnduc1in~ this recall (ln bc::haif n1 e:irn hus manu1acturer. r CURRE~T SCHOOL BUS INVESTIGATIONS I, 42 - Introduction .} This section contains information concerning current safety defect and Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard compliance investigations being conducted by NHTSA . ... - Office of Defect Investigations Safety Defect Investigations Make Ford Model(s) B700 Year(s) Subject 1992 Loss of power steering assist (PE96-073). Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard {FMVSS} Compliance Investigations Make Model(s) Blue Bird TC2000 Blue Bird TC2000 Carpenter Classmate II \u0026amp; Classic Wayne Lifestar Year(s) Description 1996 Failure to meet the requirements of FMVSS No. 217, \"Bus Window Retention and Release. 1997 Failure to meet the requirements of FMVSS No. 301. \"Fuel System Integrity.\" 1995-96 Failure to meet the requirements of FMVSS No. 217, \"Bus Window Retention and Release.\" 1995 Failure to meet the requirements of FMVSS No. 222, 'School Bus Passenger Seating.\" If you have any information pertaining to these investigations please contact the Auto Safety Hotline at (800) 424-9393. The information you provide will be forwarded to the involved investigator. who may contact you for additional information. 43 HOW TO CONTACT NHTSA WHO WE ARE AND WHAT WE DO The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is the Federal government agency responsible for assuring the safety of vehicles traveling on public roadways. The Auto Safety Hotline was established by NHTSA to allow members of the public to communicate their concerns relating to motor vehicle safC!Y-to ttie agency. WHAT THE HOTLINE DOES The Hodine collects complaints relating to:  Current safety recall campaigns  Safety related defects found in a motor vehicle or item of motor vehicle equipment OTHER SERVICES The Hotline also distributes information on the following topic areas:  Current safety recall campaigns  Current safety defect and noncompliance investigations conducted by NHTSA  Child safety scats  Safety belts and air bags  Drunk driving literature  Annual safety recalls report  Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards  Motor vehicle import requirements  Odometer fraud  Uniform tire grading specifications HOW TO GET MORE INFORMATION The Hotline can be reached from anywhere in the United States and its territories by calling (800) 424-9393 or (202) 366-0123. Operators are available to take your calls Monday through Friday from 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. Eastern time. Consumers who contact the Hotline during non-opentionaJ hours can leave a message on the answering machine, which will be responded to oa die next business day. Spanish speaking operators are also available. Hearing impaired persons may contact the Hodine at (800) 424-9152 or (202) 366-7800. VISIT US ON THE WEB Information is now available on the Internet at: http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov -- Arkansas DIRECTOR'S COMMUNICATION DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION TATE CAPITOL MALL LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-1071  (501) 682-4475 GENE WILHOIT, Director, General Education Division NO: CUR-97-096 Page: 1 of 1 OFHCE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING Date: June 3, 1997 Forward Copies To: Superintendents, Co-Op Directors Other: Summer School Directors Type of Memo: Regulatory Response Required By: Those Affected Assistant Director, Planning \u0026amp; Curriculum: Mr. Bill Ballard Subject: K-3 Summer Program Administration Index Code: CGA Regulatory Authority: Ark. Code Ann. 6-16-703 (Supp. 1997) Contact Person: Mary Kaye McKinney Phone No: (501) 682-5615 Enclosed is a final copy of the Rules and Regulations for the K-3 Summer Supplemental Instructional Program. The State Board of Education approved these as final rules and regulations during the meeting on May 19, 1997. The K-3 Summer School applications are being reviewed. Enclosed is a corrected copy of the June calendar which had an error listing Monday as June 29th instead of June 30th. If this change impacts your summer school program, please resubmit the corrected calendar. Although infonnation was provided to increase the number of extended days, the State Board of Education selected to maintain the rules and regulations as currently written. The rules and regulations still require a minimum number of 25 days for summer school participation with no more than 2 extended days. If you have submitted an application with more than two extended days, please submit a revised calendar with extended day justification, eithe through fax to (501)682-4441 or mail by June 13, 1997. If you have questions, please contac either Mary Kaye McKinney, Susan Underwood or Glenda Nugent. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION RULES AND REGULATIONS SUMMER SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: Early Childhood Initiative 1.00 Regulatory Authority 1.01 These regulations shall be known as the Arkansas Department of Education Regulations Governing the Summer Supplemental Instructional Program for the Early Childhood Initiative. 1.02 The State Board of Education enacted these regulations pursuant to its authority under Ark. Code Ann. 6-16-703 (Supp.1997). 2.00 Purpose of Regulations 2.01 The purpose of these regulations is to provide guidelines under which local school districts may be allowed to provide summer supplemental instruction for students in kindergarten through grade three not performing at grade level during the regular school year. 2.02 These regulations outline the procedures under which students are identified for participation in the supplemental summer school. 2.03 These regulations describe the condition under which students who are determined to be performing below grade level in reading and mathematics may be promoted to the next grade level. 3.00 Definitions 3.01 \"Below grade level\" for all children in kindergarten through third grade shall be determined by the local school district using a combination of measures including teacher made tests, teacher observation, performance based assessments including portfolios and other diagnostic indicators, and/or performance on other appropriate screening/assessment instruments. 3.02 \"Grade level\" for students identified as disabled under state and federal regulations, shall be determined at the local district by the Individual Education Program (IEP) committee, using a combination of criteria including attainment of goals and objectives related to reading and mathematics on each student's IEP, results of criterion-referenced tests, and measures of discrepancy between ability and achievement. 3.03 \"Summer school\" shall be 25 days with each day being four hours in length. Student/teacher interaction shall be a minimum of three hours each day. The A remaining hour shall be for snacks, breaks, and teacher planning. These days W shall be scheduled outside the regular school year. Of the 25 days, no more than two may be extended to eight hours and count as two, four hour days. 4.00 Student Eligibility 4.01 Students enrolled in grades K-3 during the regular school year and performing below grade level in reading and/or mathematics and at-risk for retention are eligible and shall attend summer school to be eligible for promotion to the next grade. 5.00 Location of Summer School Classes 5.01 Local districts providing a supplemental summer school program for grades K-3 may elect to provide the program within the district or cooperatively with other districts. 6.00 Staffing 6.01 Each summer school program shall be staffed by an administrator and teachers from the K-6 level who meet state licensure regulations for K-6 or 1-6. 6.02 All site administrators and teachers of K-3 summer school shall have completed the Early Childhood Initiative Training as provided by the Arkansas Department of Education or the K-4 Crusade Graduate Course. 6.03 Class size shall be based on a student/teacher ratio of 12 to 1. An instructional assistant shall be provided for any class that includes more than two grade levels. 7.00 Funding 7.01 Summer programs shall be provided at no cost to students and shall include instruction, teacher preparation, transportation. materials. and snacks. 8.00 Instruction 8.01 The instructional program shall be developed consistent with the strategies presented in the Early Childhood Initiative. 8.02 The instructional program shall provide for effective parent involvement which actively engages the parent/ primary caregiver in the education of their child. Parent involvement should emphasize promotion of literacy within the home and  may include parent/child school sponsored activities, parent/primary caregiver volunteers, written and verbal communications, conferences, training of activities/ materials that may be used in the home, etc. 8.03 Students in grades K-3 who are identified as not reading at grade level should receive intensive reading instruction during their regularly scheduled reading time throughout the regular school year. The intensive reading instruction may include one-on-one tutoring or small group instruction which includes specific strategies to support a balanced literacy program. 8.04 Students who participated in summer school shall have activities designed for sustaining progress during the following year. These activities may include but not limited to the following:  placement with a teacher(s) who has participated in qualifying training  supplemental services  extended day tutorial  parent/home intervention 9.00 Administration 9.01 Each school district must prepare a plan that will provide for the supplemental summer school program for students in the district. The plan may provide for a single district program or describe how the district will provide such a program through a cooperative effort. 9.02 The plan must be submitted for approval to the Department of Education on or before May 31 of each year. 9.03 The plan must include superintendent signed assurances, a descript10n of the student identification process used consistent with section 4.01 of these Rules and Regulations, calendar, class grouping and description of parent involvement. 9.04 Demographic student data must be submitted to the Department of Education by October 15th of each year. 9.05 The local school district may apply to the Director of the Department of Education for a waiver to enhance and expand the use of funds for in-school and summer school for the development of an overall comprehensive program when the district has identified their students as being at grade level. SUMMER SCHOOL CALENDAR A Circle the days that summer school will be provided. B. Indicate the beginning and ending time for each day (ie.8: I 5 - 12:00). C. Enrichment experiences (ie. Field trips, parent day, etc.) Beyond a three hour may be approved if related to the curriculum. Indicate the day, time and attach description/plan. JUNE Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 IO l l 12 l3 14 16 17 18 19 . 20 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 30  Arkansas DIRECTOR'S COMMUNICATION DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ED STATE CAPITOL MALL LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-1071  (501) 682-4475 GENE WILHOIT, Director, General Education Division JUN 9 - 1997 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING Forward Copies To: Superintendents, Co-Op Directors Secondary Principals NO: CUR-97-097 Page: 1 of 2 Date: June 4, 1997 Type of Memo: Informational Response Required By: Optional There are attachments to this memo. Assistant Director, Planning \u0026amp; Curriculum: Bill Ballard Subject: Technology Resources Index Code: IJND Satellite Instruction for the 1997-98 School Year Regulatory Authority: State Board of Education Guidelines Adopted April, 1989 Contact Penon: Dr. Charles Watson Phone No: (501) 682-4474 FAX No.: (501) 682-4886 Since 1988, the State Board of Education has endorsed the inclusion of satellite-delivered instruction in secondary schools of the state. Under the guidelines, the Department of Education is charged with supervising the programming as well as approving credit courses that are proposed for the school curriculum. Schools that currently provide satellite courses, as well as those that intend to provide one or more courses via satellite-delivered instruction, must complete the one-page Application for Satellite Instruction 1997-98 form. The providers have been advised that they should not accept registration information that does not include an approved Department of Education application. Currently, there are four approved providers of instructional programming. Each establishes different registration dates, and each has a different method for completing the registration process. Each school must register students directly with the provider. Due to the changing nature of program delivery, each school should verify that Satellite receiver equipment continues to be compatible with that used by the provider. A Distance Learning Committee, chaired by Dr. Charles D. Watson, is charged with the responsibility of linking the Department with the providers of distance learning and reviewing and recommending approval of applications for credit-based courses. The committee will provide technical assistance to schools as needed to assure quality instructional programs through this medium. Applications will be reviewed as they are received, and a copy of the approval will be returned to the district. Applications should be in our office no later than Friday, August 1, 1997. Please return to: Dr. Charles D. Watson Manager, Special Projects Arkansas Department of Education #4 State Capitol Mall, Room 107A Little Rock, AR 72201-1071 ease type application information School District SATELLITE INSTRUCTION 1997-98 Application Form Arkansas Department of Education -------------------------------------- Address -----------------County ------------------ --~------------- Zip Superintendent _______________ Telephone ______________ _ School Coordinator _____________ Telephone ______________ _ Do you presently have dish and receiver equipment? Yes ___ _ No ___ _ l'rom t.lie att.clJed llst of course approved for t.lie 1997-98 clJool :,ear, 11st clJ course to be ofTend, t.lie propam -urctJ, t.lie t:Ja.uoom Ji,cJJJtator arid t.lie .ocJaJ security zuu111Nr oft.lie Ji,cJJJtator. COURSE PROGRAM SOURCE NUMBER STUDENTS f ACILIT A TOR Anv chanac in course or facilitator should be provided to the Arkansas Department of Education on or before AuJ\n!ust I. 1997. Did your district participate in satellite instruction during 1996-97? Yes __ _ No ___ _ FACILITATOR'S SS# Please return tbi, form on or before August 1, 1997 to Dr. Charles D. Watson, Manager, Special Projects, Arkan1a1 Department of Education, #4 State Capitol Mall, Room 107-A, Little Rock, AR 72201-1071. ASSURANCES I . Teachers/classroom managers will particpate in an in-service training to learn about equipment, course organization and classroom management. 2. The district is unable to employ a certified teacher (s) to teach the course(s) used to meet the Standards. 3. Enrollment in the course(s) does not exceed requirement of the Standards. Date __ Approved __ Disapproved Superintendent For SEA Use Only Reviewed by: __________ _ - Guidelines Utilization of Satellite Instruction Uevi.\\'ed April I 'JH'J I. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Satellite programs for instructional purposes in Arkansas school districts must be under the supervision of the State Department of Education. All courses taught by satellite must adhere to guidelines and course objectives established by the Department of Education or be approved by the Department of Education. Satellite Courses must be taught by experienced master teachers. Each satellite class must have a classroom manager who is a certified teacher, preferably in a related field, to supervise and manage the classroom. (In exceptional cases a trained aide may be used.) In-service training must be provided for classroom managers to learn about equipment, course organization and classroom management. Instructional programs should be liver and interactive or provide for microcomputer software designed to reinforce the television lessons. Supplemental)' printed materials correlated with the satellite course must be used for reYiew, drill and practice and homework in order to strengthen concepts being taught. Specific uniform procedures for evaluating student progress must be used in the courses. Two units of satellite course credit may be applied toward graduation requirements. Districts designated as isolated may request pem1ission from the Department of Education to offer a third unit of credit. I 0. In order to award credit for satellite courses in subjects that are required by the Standards, a school district must be unable to pro,ide a certified teacher for the course. 11 . Schools may provide satellite courses either live or by use of video tapes. (Video tape courses must also provide microcomputer software.) 12. Enrollment in satellite classes must adhere to State Department of Education class size guidelines. 13. All satellite courses offered for credit as required by the education Standards must have the approval of the Department of Education. These guidelines will be used as a basis for granting approval to local districts who wish to offer courses by satellite. Approved Providers of Satellite-Delivered Courses 1997-98 Satellite Education Resources Consortium (SERC) P.O. Box 50008 Columbia, SC 29250 800-476-5001 www.scsn.net/users/serc Full schedule of courses (see attached delivery schedule) See Web site for course descriptions and enrollment fees Spanish Via Satellite Educational Communications Center Kansas State University - 128 Bob Dole Hall Manhattan, KS 66506 800-533-6036 Spanish I and II Delivery schedule attached United Star Distance Learning Consortium, Inc. Formerly TI-IN Network 9300 Livingston Road Fort Washington, Maryland 20744 888-828-7352 Full schedule of courses (see attached delivery schedule) PeachStar Education Services Georgia Public Broadcasting P.O. Box 38472 Atlanta, GA 30334 800-222-6006 www.ceismc.gatech.edu/irasshai/ Irasshai - Japanese I and II : . .,,. ~\n.1::~ . -  '( Technical Information . . . '  ,e,. Course Titles and Descriptions I Transmission Schedule SERC *Tentative* Transmission Schedule 1997-98 School Year Last Updated: 4114197 (Exact satellite information will be provided as soon as it becomes available.) !EASTERN TIMEIIKu-BAND DIGITAL IIEASTERN TIMEIIKu-BAND DIGITajlEASTERN TIME C-BAND ANALOG 1 8:00 am - II Russian II 118:~0 am - I-Li:ehls~:pe- I\"' om 1=:\n1 . 8:50 am __ TIWfTh/F .. 8.55 am . M/I'/WfTh/F _ 9.25 am M/I'/WfTh/F Japanese II 1 M/I'/WfTh/F 9:00 am - IIAP Economics 119:00 am - II Gennan l 119:30 am - ll:00 a .. T/Th .. 9:50 am __ M/I'/WfTh/F .. 10:20 am :======~:======~ I~~\nI AP Gove~\n: Politics I- 11. II- 11:50am I: 1110:00 am - II Gennan I 1110:30 am - . .. 10:50 am __ MII'/WfTh/F .. 11:20 am Japanese Ill M/I'/WfTh/F Japanese II -TapeM/ f/WfTh/F 11 :00 am - Latin I 11 :30 am  Section 8 I I iapanese I ll : 50 am . Mil' /W fTh/F . 12: 20 pm Mil' /W fTh/F ::======:::::========::======::======~::======: I=~ II 12:00pm- 12:50 pm ll:OOpm- 1:50 pm I- 1 2:00 pm 2:50pm 3:00 pm- 3:50 pm 3:00 pm - 4:30 pm 1 3:00 pm - . 5:00pm Japanese I -TapeM/ I'/WfTh/F llspanish I II-llspanish II IRUWDIU -Tape- M/W/F 12:00pm - 1:15 pm II- 111:30 pm. 2:10pm II-II Scien\u0026lt;:e Out \u0026lt;Thi, World I -Tape- . Th Work in the 21st Century Math in the Middle ... Staff Development II- II-II- II-II II II II II II Remember to check back here for updates often! COURSE FORMAT Spanish via Satellite (SVS) utilizes a five-day per week format, in which the learning experience is enhanced through a variety of instructional methods, including textbooks, audiocassette tapes, and computer software, as well as live television broadcasts. Course content is comparable to traditional beginning Spanish courses .. Students learn to communicate with people of the Spanish-speaking world through instruction and practice in the four basic skills of speaking, listening, reading, and writing. Both Spanish I and II emphasize cultural awareness. Two -!5-minute, li\\e television (via satellite) programs are presented each Tuesd,1\\ and Thursday, at the following times: SPANISH l-1l:30PM - 1:15 PMCT SPANISH II- 1:30PM - l:15 PMCT During these broadcasts, a random rotation of schools assures telephone interaction between students and the studio instmctor. Scheduling of classes at times which coincide ,,ith the live broadcasts is strongly encouraged. On non-broadcast d,1ys, a classroom Teaching Partner conducts learning activities developed and pro\\ided by the instructor. The instructor or an assist,mt is only il toll-free call away. A tol:-free telephone line is 1-.1ro\\ided to facilitate contact between the ECC instructor and staff, and the Teaching Partners and students. T COURSE EQUIPMENT The participating school\"s downlink (satellite dish antenna and receiver) must be able to receive Ku-Band frequencies. Please be aware that there are two major satellite bands: C-Band and Ku-Band, which, somewhat like AM and FM radio, cannot automatically be received on all equipment. This equipment must be steerable in order to adjust for any transponder changes. Some CBand equipment can be retrofitted to receive Ku-Band signals. To verify this option, contact your equipment supplier. Other necessary equipment includes:  television monitor (2~ rcc,,mm,n,k,11  videocassette recorder (to record broadcasts off-air)  dedicated telephone line  cordless telephone (,,,,ak,r-plwn, tund1,\u0026gt;11 Ice \"111lh\"'.Ocd l  audiocassette player/ recorder or CD player/ cassette recorder (with tone or bass/ treble control: a \"boom-box\" is ideal) 1Cll , ''- ,r rcc,,,11111,11,kd 1,,,. ,l.111t, ,111cl 1,,ngc, it, 1 l APR-21-1997 13:41 WESTCOTT 972 716 5109 P.04 United Star Distance Learning Consortium (USDLC), Inc. 1997-98 Broadcast Schedule StarNet (formerly TI-IN Network) nme PT MT CT ET Chllnnel A (2132\u0026gt; Channel B rns61 4:30Lm. 5:30a.m. 6:JOLm. 7\n30Lm, CNN Newsroom 5:00 a.111. 6:00 a.m. 7:00a.m. 8:00Lm. Anatomy \u0026amp; Physiology Latin I Block (Fall) Latin Il Block (Spring) 6:00a.m. 7:00a.m. 8:00a.ra. 9:00a.m. Spanish I 6:JOa.m. 7:JO LID, 8:JOLm. 9:30a.m. Research Writing {T,TH) Business Comm. (MWF) 1:00a.m. 8:00a.m. 9:001.m. 10:00 LIii, Gennan Il French II Intro to Elem. World Around L's 8:00a.m. 9:00a.m. 10:00a.m. 11:00 a.JD, Spanish II SJ\u0026gt;IDWl ' (T,TII) {MWF) 8:30Lm. 9:30a.m. 10:JOa.m. 11:30 Lm. . Science Cowits! 3-5 {MWF) EJemStodent Enrich. (T, TH) 9:00 a.m. 10:00 LID. 11:00 LID- 12:00 p.m. Calculus/ AP Calculus French I 10:00a.m. 11:00a.m. 12:00 p.m. l:OOp.m. Marine/Aquatic Science Science World \u0026lt;M-TH)  (Fall-Saltwater, Oceans\nSpring-Freshwater, wetlands) 10:30 a.m. 11:30 a.m. 12:30 p.m. 1:30 p-111. Languages Around the World (M-,'.fH) , ., .. _\nffi~Scbool Enrichment (F) ., 11:00 a.m. 12:00 p.m. 1:00p.m. 2:00 p.m. Sociology/PsycboloiY/ Science COUDli! 6-8  AP Psychology Middle School (MWF) ~ ~~-~oo~-Enri~ er.TH\u0026gt; ... ' .. .. 12:00 p.m. 1:00 p.m. 2:00p.m. 3:00 p.m. Tes?, _101 (T.111) .. - Japanese n (MWTH) ' . 12:30 p.m. 1:30 p.m. 2:30 p.m. 3:30 p.111, SAT/ACT 'That Review. en .. 1:00 p.m. 2:00 p.m. 3:00p.m. 4:00 p.m. Tech Talk (M). .  011 ~ol (M-TII) . Staff Developm~t ('f,TH)  Middle School NOTE: All courser\narc subJ~I to muwnum enrollment Apn/ JO, 1997  Available as a single semester or u a full-year cou~e. *-Most Staff Development will be pre-taped. Some Staff Development will be live and interactive. Courses scheduled in $haded rime blocks are pre-taped. For IDformatioa Call: 1-188-823-7352  Transmission Schedule lrasshai, Japanese I, will be delivered on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays at 7:30 a.m. and 12:30 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. lrasshai, Japanese II, will be delivered on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays at 9:30 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. Some weeks will have two broadcasts\nother weeks will have three. A detailed calendar/ schedule for Japanes_e I and II can be provided to schools interested in enrollment. Video programs need to be taped and used in the sequence of their broadcast so that the audio interaction sessions can properly support video instruction. It is not necessary to watch the programs as they air since they are not live\nhowever, programs must be viewed on the day of the broadcast or before the audio interaction session as the lessons are sequential. For both Japanese I and II, the first air date for the 1997 - 1998 school year is Wednesday, September 3, 1997. The final broadcast date will be Wednesday May 20, 1998. There will be days throughout the year that will be used to \"catch up.\" This will mean that there will not be a broadcast on that day, and class time will be used for students to get caught up on related instructional activities, review and practice what they've learned, and prepare for upcoming exams. There will also be days when there will not be a broadcast due to holidays. As closely as possible, every effort will be made to parallel the holiday schedule for the majority of schools. It will be the facilitator's role to coordinate the use of the video broadcasts, the classroom activities, the audio interaction sessions, and the required assessment with the transmission schedule. 3 en n :r tD 0.. C - tD Atiaosas DIRECI'OR'S COMMUNICATION DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 4 J\\TE CAPITOL MALL LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-1071  (501) 682-4475 GENE WILHOIT, Director, General Education Division JUN - 1997 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORI Forward Copies To: Superintendents, Co-Op Directors NO: FIN-97-115 Page: 1 of I Date: June 5, 1997 Type of Memo: Regulatory Response Required By: All There are attachments to this memo. Assistant Director, Finance \u0026amp; Administration: Dr. Bobbie Davis Subject: Safety Drills Index Code: EBCB Tri-Annual Fire Drill Reports Regulatory Authority: Ark. Code Ann. 6-10-110 (Repl. 1993) Contact Person: Dave Floyd Phone No: 682-4261 Your third tri-annual fire drill report is due on June 20, 1997. Enclosed is a copy of the form for your use. Duplicate this form as needed for your district. Please report the results of all of your monthly drills that were not included on your February report. Return the form to School Plant Service. TRI-ANNUAL FIRE DRILL REPORT AS REQUIRED BY STATE BOARD POLICY FOR ALL SCHOOL DISTRICTS IN KEEPING WITH ACT 61 of the 1959 ARKANSAS GENERAL ASSEMBLY School District Name: ---------------------------- Address: _________________ County: ____________ _ Report #1 ________ Report#2 _________ Report #3 _______ _ (Sept 20) (Feb 20) (June 20) 1. Is there a School Fire Marshal Program currently in operation in each unit of the school district? Yes____ No ___ _ 2. Is there an adequate evacuation plan with a diain:a,rn posted inside each classroom of the school district? Yes____ No ___ _ 3. Are all buildings checked for haz.ards before being locked at the end of the day and at night after activities? Yes____ No ___ _ 4. Has each school facility been inspected by your local fire department, as required by Ark. Code Ann. 6-21- 106? Yes ___ _ No ---- 5. Does the district provide a program of safety training essential to the reasonable protection of the lives of students and property from fire and other haz.ards in each unit of the school district? Yes____ No ___ _ SCHOOL DA TE OF FIRE DRILL TIME OF FIRE DRILL EVACUATION TIME Dave Floyd, Coordinator SCHOOL PLANT SERVICE SIGNED --------SUPERINTENDENT DA TE _______ _ PLEASE SUBMIT TO: SCHOOL PLANT SERVICE, ROOM 110-B #3 CAPITOL MALL, LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 ADE Form No. FIN-07-00-001 8/91 Attansas DIRECTOR'S COMMUNICATION DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION \"'\" \\ ,,:r\n.]1' ~'f,111fl'E CAPITOL MALL LITIL~ ROCK, ARKANSAS '?2201~1~?1  (501) 682-4475 -    cr:,U GENE WILHOIT, Director, General Education D1v1S1on Cl--flCE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING Forward Copies To: Secondary Principals Middle/Jr. High Principals Elementary Principals NO: DIR 97-016 Page: 1 of 1 Date: June 5, 1997 Type of Memo: Informational Response Required By: Those Affected There are attachments to this memo. Deputy Director, General Education: Dr. Diana Julian Subject: Supervision of Professional Staff Index Code: GCN Teacher Supervision Workshop for New Elementary/Secondary Principals Regulatory Authority: NIA Contact Person: Janinne Riggs Phone No: 682-4374 The Arkansas Department of Education will sponsor a workshop on teacher supervision for new elementary/secondary principals on July 24, 1994, 9:30 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. at the North Little Rock High School-East Campus Mini Auditorium, 2400 Lake view Road, North Little Rock. The workshop will focus on the principles of supervision and evaluation, legal issues pertaining to evaluation, and the recently adopted teacher evaluation regulations. Featured speakers will be Dr. Diana Julian, Deputy Director and Mr. Paul Blume, General Counsel for the Arkansas School Boards Association. The recently adopted rules and regulations do not require new principals to attend teacher evaluation training sessions, however, the ADE does plan to continue providing orientation sessions. Attendance is not mandatory and is the decision of the local district. Please return the attached registration to Janinne Riggs, Room# 401-A, Fax Number: 501-682-4249 no later than July 11, 1997 to confirm participation. Lunch will be on your own. Contact Janinne at 682-4374 if you have questions. Namti. School District: Position\nTEACHER SUPERVISION WORKSHOP For New Elementary/Secondary Principals July 24, 1997 9:30 A.M. - ~:00 P.M. North Little Rock High School-East Campus Mini Auditorium 2400 Lakeview Road North Little Rock (Map on back of Agenda) Mailina= Address\n____________________ _ Phone Number: Please return this registration by July 11, 1997, to Janinne Riggs #4 State Capitol Mall, Room 401-A, Little Rock, AR 72201 or fax to (501) 682-1249. attachment -DM # DIR 97-016 TEACHER SUPERVISION WORKSHOP July 24, 1997 North Little Rock High School-East Campus Mini Auditorium 2400 Lakeview Road North Little Rock (Map on back of Agenda) Tentative Agenda 9:30 -11:30- Dr. Diana Julian The Principles of Supervision 11:30-1:00- Lunch on your own 1:00 -3:00- Mr. Paul Blume Legal Issues    ADE Memos Received 6-16-97 Computerized Data Systems Statewide Information System Manual Public Hearing Public Hearing on Proposed Revisipn to ADE's Regulations \u0026lt;1\nnd Procedures Governing Home Schools School District Annual Report Final Notice of Accreditation for the 1996-97 School Year Intervention/Prevention Grant Program for Arkansas School Children Arkansas . DIRECTOR'S COMMUNICATION .,~~1~!M~~K.~!'KE.!?,!!,S~!!.2~ GENE WILHOIT, Director, General Education Division JUN I G 1997 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING NO: IT-97-002 Page: 1 of 1 Date: June 12, 1997 Forward Copies To: Superintendents, Co-Op Directors Type of Memo: Informational Response Required By: None There are attachments to this memo. Assistant Director, Information and Technology: Jim Boardman Subject: Computerized Data Systems Index Code: EHA Statewide Information System Manual Regulatory Authority: NI A Contact Person: John Gately Brenda Caudle Phone No: (501) 682-5246 (johng@apscn.kl2.ar.us) (501) 682-5192 (brendac@apscn.kl2.ar.us) The Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) in cooperation with the Arkansas Public School Computer Network (APSCN) has developed a state reporting process that will allow Arkansas school districts to report their data electronically over the statewide network to the Department. Enclosed is a copy of the Statewide Information System Manual for the 1997-98 and 1998-99 school years. The manual includes the data elements, submission cycles, list of reports, and calculations which will be used for the initial implementation of the system. The manual and data elements will be updated annually in consultation with school districts and educational service cooperative staff to reflect changes in state and federal reporting requirements. Every effort will be made to distribute the annual update as far in advance of the new fiscal year as possible. Anticipated changes for the 1998-99 school year include revision in the course code/job assignment numbering system to make the numbering system more standard and reflective of the variety of courses being offered. Changes in the numbering system should be available by January 1998. The manual cannot answer all questions, especially for non-APSCN districts. Please contact statewide information system project leader, John Gately at 682-5246 (johng@apscn.kl2.ar.us) or the data base manager, Brenda Caudle at 682-5192 (brendac@apscn.kl2.ar.us) with any comments or concerns. JUN 1 6 i997 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING Forward Copies To: Superintendents, Co-Op Directors NO: TEC-97-050 Page: I of I Date: June 12, 1997 Type of Memo: Informational Response Required By: Those Affected Assistant Director, Technical Assistance: Frank Anthony Subject: Public Hearing lndex Code: BEE Public Hearing on Proposed Revision to ADE's Regulations and Procedures Governing Home Schools Regulatory Authority: Ark. Code Ann. ~ 6- I 5-50 I through 507 (Repl. 1993) as amended by Act 522 of 1995 and Act 400 of 1997. Contact Person: Yvette Dillingham Phone No: (501) 682-4252 NOTICE: THE ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION (ADE) WILL HOLU A PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED REVISIONS TO THE ADE'S REGULATIONS AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING HOME SCHOOL ON MONDAY,JUNE 30, 1997,AT 2:00 P.M. IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM OF THE BIG MAC BUILDING, #I CAPITOL MALL, LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS. A COPY OFTIIE PROPOSED REVISIONS IS ATTACHED. WRITTEN COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC WILL BE ACCEPTED lJNTILJUNE JO, 1997, AND THOSE COMMENTS SHOULD BE SENT TO: YVETTE DILLINGHAM,#-' CAPITOL MALL, ROOM 102-B, LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201. 1.00 PROPOSED ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION REGULATIONS AND PROCEDURES FOR HOME SCHOOLS REGULATORY AUTHORITY 1.0 I These regulations shall be known as Arkansas Department of Education Regulations governing the Home School Program. 1.02 These regulations are enacted pursuant to the State Board of Education's authority under Ark. Code Ann. 6-15-501 through 507 (Repl. 1993) as amended by ACT 522 of 1995 and Act 400 of 1997. 2.00 PURPOSE 2.0 I It is the purpose of these regulations to set the reasonable guidelines for the operation of the Home School Program. 3.00 GENERAL 3.01 Under Arkansas law children between the ages oftive (5) and seventeen ( 17) inclusive on October I (September I to begin in school year 1998 in accordance with Act 12]0 of 1997) must attend school. 3.02 For the purpose of this Act, a parent who intends to home school a child who will be five (5) years old by October I (September I to begin in school year 1998 in accordance with Act 1230 of 1997), must enroll the child in home school within ten (10) days of the beginning of the current school year or at any time during the school year the parent withdraws the child from the local or resident school district. Parent/guardian withdrawing their child during the school year must register for home school within ten ( I 0) days of the beginning of each school year thereafter. Any parent/guardian who withdraws their child from public, private, or parochial school any time during the school year shall file an Intent to Home School and Waiver Forms with the superintendent of the local or resident school district. These forms shall be tiled within ten ( I 0) days of withdrawal from the public, private, or parochial school. As described in Section Five (5) in these Rules and Regulations. any student entering home schooling during the school year shall participate in the re(Juired State testing Rev. 6/97 program at the required grade levels0 3.03 Parents may elect for a child, who will not be six (6) by October 1 (or five (S) by September I to begin in school year I 998 in accordance with Act 1230 of I 997), not to attend kindergarten by filing a Kindergarten Waiver form with the local school district administration office. 3.04 A home school is defined as a school conducted primarily by parents or legal guardians for their own children. 3.05 Home school students who enroll in a public, private or parochial school during the time they are home schooling cannot re-enter home schooling until a new Notice of Intent and Waiver forms are completed and returned to the local or resident school district. 3.06 Home school students who are in the required grade levels for which the state mandates norm-referenced testing and who are no more than two (2) years beyond the normal age for the required grade levels must take a standardized normreferenced test as identified by the Arkansas Department of Education and results will be used for statistical purposes only. 3.07 Books, curricula or materials are not furnished by the Arkansas Department of Education, local school district, or education se1vice cooperatiw 1t is the responsibility of the parent/guardian to purchase all books, curricula or materials that they use in home schooling. 4.00 NOTICE OF INTENT 4.01 Parents or Guardians who plan to home school must file written notice by completing and returning the printed current year Notice of Intent and Waiver forms to the public school superintendent's otlice of their local or resident school district within ten (I 0) days of the beginning of each school year or at any time during the school year that the parent/guardian withdraws the child(ren) from the local or resident school district. Parent/guardian who withdraws their child(ren) during the school year must complete a current year printed Notice of Intent and Waiver forms within ten ( I 0) days of the beginning of the school year thereafter. There are no exceptions to these filing requirements except as outlined in 4.02. 4.02 Any student(s) home schooled in another state prior to moving to Arkansas during Rev. 6/97 2 4.03 the current school year may continue in a home school if the parent(s) or guardian(s) file the current year printed Notice of Intent and Waiver forms with their local or resident public school superintendent's otlice within thirty(30) school days. The required Notice of Intent and Waiver forms must be the printed current year forms obtained from your local superintendent's office and must include the following information for statistical and test administration purposes only: a. The name, date of birth, and grade level of each child and the name and address of the public, private, home school or parochial school last attended, if any, for each student. b. The location of the home school (your mailing address) and phone number. c. A brief description of the basic core curriculum to be used and the subjects to be taught. d. Schedule of instruction to be followed (hours per day\ndays per week\nnumber of weeks). e. The education qualifications of the parent/teacher(s). f Parents or guardians shall deliver written notice in person to the superintendent of their local school district the first time such notice is given~ 5.00 TESTING REQUIRED 5.01 ACHIEVEMENT TESTS a. Test administration of home school students shall be under the direction of the education service cooperatives and the Pulaski County school districts. Achievement testing will be during the testing dates identified by the Arkansas Department of Education. b. The education service cooperatives and Pulaski County school districts will ensure that all test materials are secure before testing, between and following test administration and provide the Arkansas Department of Education, for approval by the Director, with a common set of procedures for test Rev. 6/97 3 administration of home school students in the required grade levels. These common set of procedures must include security measures to ensure that appropriate testing conditions and procedures have been followed as outlined in the appropriate test administration instructions. c. Each student enrolled in a home school program who is considered to be in the required grades or no more than two (2) years beyond the age appropriate grade will be tested annually by using the State identified norm-referenced achievement test. d. Parent/guardian requesting alternate testing procedures and timeframe must be submitted in writing to the education service cooperatives or the Pulaski County school districts and must remain within the State identified testing dates. If approved, alternate testing procedure costs shall be the responsibilitiy of the parent/guardian. 6.00 TEST RES UL TS 6.01 All test results for home school students will be used for statistical purposes only. 7.00 TRANSFER OF STUDENTS 7.01 Students transferring from a school not accredited by the state, including home school, to a school which is accredited by the state shall be evaluated by the staff of the accredited school to determine proper placement. As a part of the on-going assessment process, a State identified norm-referenced achievement test shall be one of the instruments utilized. 7.02 Local school districts have discretion to determine which course credits, if any, will be recognized when a student transfers from an unaccredited school. 7.03 Home School is an unaccredited school, there are no grades, credits, transcript, or diploma provided by the Arkansas Department of Education, education service cooperative or by the local school district for students enrolled in home school. 7.04 Any home school student who re-enters a local school district must attend classes for at least nine (9) months immediately prior to graduation before the student can Rev. 6/97 4 8.00 become eligible to receive a high school diploma from the local school district. STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES 8.01 By way of these regulations, it shall be the policy of the State Board of Education that school districts provide a genuine opportunity (see 34 C.F.R. Sec. 76.651 (a)) to students who are home-schooled with disabilities, as defined in state regulations, to access special education and related services from the district where they reside. This policy is not to be constrned as conferring the procedural protections and rights under Part B of the IDEA to such students and their parents. 8.02 Only state and/or local funds may be used to provide such services. 9.00 DRIVER'S PERMIT/LICENSE 9.01 A student enrolled in a home school shall present proof in the form ofa notarized Notice of Intent along with an application for an instructional permit or for a driver's license. The parent/guardian has the responsibility of providing the notarized copy. Rev. 6/97 5 Arkansas DIRECTOR'S COMMUNICATION DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ~TATE CAPITOL MALL LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-1071  (501) 682-4475 t GENE WILHOIT, Director, General Education\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_898","title":"Desegregation: ''North Little Rock School District Desegregation Plan,'' Book 1 of 3","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1986"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Education--Arkansas","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School integration","Educational statistics","Student assistance programs"],"dcterms_title":["Desegregation: ''North Little Rock School District Desegregation Plan,'' Book 1 of 3"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/898"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nSubmitted October 14, 1986\napproved February 27, 1987\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nl APPENDIX 67-69 2 APPENDIX 81-364 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DESEGREGATION PLAN SUBMITTED OCTOBER 14, 1986 APPROVED FEBRUARY 27, 1987 BOOK 1 of 3 NLRSD Proposed Desegregation Plan Part 1 submitted on 3/17/86 was supplemented and became the Plan submitted on 10/14/86 Parts 1 and 2 SEE APPENDIX PAGES 000''6/ - 005-:35 00067 a'\\ ...J I a'\\ 10 N :r,, \"d \"d l:,j z 0 H \u0026gt;\u0026lt; c:c ~ I w a'\\ V, STUDENT ASSIGNMEI 2 APPENDIX 81-365 UITMENT PLAN SPECIAL EDUCATION PLAN ro t.O ~-~... / ~ I g {) if) 0 ~ ~ 0 Q) _q ' u t: Cl) -~ ~ .u.. .. ...c:: pwe 4 ...,..o 111114 ~ 0~ z !N THE UNI~ED STATE:S DIST~:c~ COUR~ EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKA~SAS w'ESTERN D!VISION LITTLE ROCK SC~OOL DISTRICT vs. NO. LR-C-d 2-aoo PULASKI COUNTY S?EC!AL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. l, et al. MRS. LORE~E JOSHUA, et al. DE:ENDANTS INTERVE:,lORS ?LAN FOR IMPLEMENTING ?HE REMEJ_AL ORDER OF THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT AS !'I' A?P~IES TO rHE ,'..O~L'\"i :,Ir\"!'LE ROCK SCHOOL D!S:'R.:CT 00069 \u0026gt; '\"d '\"d t,j z t:, 1-1 \u0026gt;\u0026lt; CX) I-' I w O'I V, NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPPLEMENT TO DESEGREGATION PLAN APPROVED FEBRUARY 27, 1987 STUDENT ASSIGNMENT PLAN STAFF RECRUITMENT PLAN SPECIAL EDUCATION PLAN -------- ------- ~~ V Cl) f , Ii 0 . t 0 ~ 0 Q)~ - u .::.:. ..\u0026lt;.. I) ~ .u,.. . -d Fas 4 .,... ,..o ~ ~~ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT Of A~KANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT VS. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. l, et al. MRS. LORE~E JOSHUA, et al. ?LAN FOR IMPLEMENTING ~HE REMEDI~L ORDER PLAINTIE'E' DEFENDANTS INTER VE NO RS Of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR rHE EIGHTH CIRCUIT AS !T A?PSIES TO rHE NO~r~ .rrTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 00082 C/l 8 c:: 0 l:lj z 8 :i:C/ l C/l H Ci) z z~ 8 \"d ti :zi: C/ l 8 !l:\" \"'l l':j ~ l:lj n ~ c:: H 8 ~z 8 \"d ~z Iti':'RODUC':I'O N In 1c.s decision of Novemoec 7, 1985 in this matt~r, tne Court of Appeals speci.f1cal1y addcessed tne 1nterdistrict vtolac.ions i.e. :ound nad oeen committed by t~e Nortn Little ~ock scnool J1scricc and ordeced tne NLaSD to ta~e S?ecifi.c C-=meJ1a_ action: It [:ne NLRSD] will tnus oe reauired to\nnake tne necessacy modificac.ions to its.studenc assignment plan, tie employment of olack adminisccatocs and princi?als, and the ado9tion of a rac1ally neutral plan evaluating and placing students requicing special education. It will also oe cequiced to cooperate in t~e ~ntecdisccict aspeccs of c.ne cemedy outlined herein. Little .:tock Sen. L\u0026gt;l:5t. v. ?ulasKi Cty. Sceci.al Sch. Dist., Memocandum Opinion at 61 (Nov. 7, 1985), 778 E'.2d 404, 435 (3tn Cir. 1985). As d r\n:SUL':, tne tlLRSD cecogn1z~::1 that Lt :13.S a li\nnit-=d role, and t~us a li~1ted interest, in furt,!r re~~dlal proceeding:\noe:0ce tn1s Cour':. ':'he sco9e cc i:s ?lan is S?@c1tically de:\nigned witn cnese l1m1tacions in :nind and is l1mited ~o\nna~ing tne cnanges in tne N:JSD's scuden: assi\nnment plan, L':S rec:::.ii.c.::ient and assignment of olack tedc:i,~r:\n, govecning the evaluacion and placement of scudents requiring spe~ial education nec~ssctCJ to comply Jtch tne mandate of th~ E:igntn Ci CCUl ':.. and :\ncope oi cne Di:\ntcict':\npact1cipation 1n any other interdistcict celief ordered oy the court cecause it would be pcematuce to address tnis 1ssue at this time. Before any 00083 meaningful consideration canoe given to an/ interdistcict cooperative programs, tne more pressing Lssu:=s oE .)011nrldry c:ianges, excnanges of propectJ, assignment oE ces?onsio1litJ for oonded indeotedness, reassignment of teac~ecs oetween districts, and che adoption of student ~ssignnent ~nd transportation plans for the districts as wod1Eied nust oe resolved. At tnis time tne Nortn Little ~ock School Jistrict does not perceive how these issues affect its interests and, therefore, has nothing to offer to the resol tic,n of tnese questions. Once these issues ace reso ved and tne District court deems lt appropriate tne NLRSD will make proposals regacaing its participation in magnet scnool and otnec cooperative programs. Should tne other parties propose sucn programs oefora these issues ace resolved ~~i~n involve th~ tnis time, t:.e :~:RSD -..,ill provide sucn ::,efoce t:ie .:une 16, 1936 nedrings. 3cwevec, as stated aoove, gi~~n :~a fact tnat all ~LRSD suomi:s tndt Lt is pre~ature to deal ..,i:n tne aoove descci::,ed ?rogr3ms at tnis time. NLRS0 suomits that tne Eollow1ng pl3n will, iE ~EEec:ivelJ implemented and monitorad, remedy tne vtol!tions Eound the tne circuit Court. of tn1s plan. Tne District pl~dges :o =amply ~itn tne teems 00084 Cl) 8 c:::: t:, t:%j z 8 ::r,, Cl) en H G') z 3: t:%j z 8 'C t-\u0026lt; ::r,, z Cl) 8 ::r,, l\"lj ~ :::0 t:%j n :::0 c:::: H 8 ~ z 8 'C t-\u0026lt; ::r,, z '\"o t-\u0026lt; ::r,, z STUDENT ASSIGNMENT PLAN HISTORY OF STOR~ PLAN Elementary students witn1n tne Distric: ace assigned accocding to tne St~,~ ?lan in gcades 1-6. The stoc~ ?lan pairs a scnool in a 9redominately olacK acea with one or moce schools in a predominately white area. These scnools are gcouped so that eacn gcoup's racial make-up represents the racial maKe-up of the Distcict. This plan is based on two pcimary premises: first tnat it accomplishs tocal integration and, second, that it is the least discriminatory met:'lod possible 1n that no area of the District can be considered to be favored in any way. In ceder to oe as faic as possiole students we,e initially selected at cancan for transportation. ~tie following 9coceuuce ~a~ used: a:l l~ctecs of tne alpnaoet wece placed in a container and an a:pnaoet was drawn from tne containP.r. aeginning wi=n tnat lettec of tne alpnaoet tne stadent oorly in each scnool .. .a s di1iced into gcou9s of at)pcopciat: .\n.1,~. .rno::n the end of tne al9naoet is reached, the 9rocess 3tar:s ovec and tne Di.strict continues to regcoup alpnabeti.calty. ELEMENTARY SC2OOLS The Noctn Little ~ocK Scnool Di.stcict desegregation plan, approved by the couct of appeals, see Davis v. 3oacri of Ed., 449 F.2d 500, 501 (8\n::i Cir. L97L) ,rnd c-:vi.sed wi.tn the approval of the district court, see Javis v. 3oacd of Ed., Oeder (E.D. ArK., May 12, 1978), incorpocates tne following features: 00085 1. Since the total student population of the elementary scnools in the North Little RocK School District is approximately 42 percent blacK and 58 percent nonoldck students, eacn elementary scnool in the district ~ust have a ~tudent population wnich approximates as nearlJ as is feasiole these percentages. 2. ro assure tnat eacn school ~ill have a student population which is composed of approximately 42 percent black students and 58 percent nonblacK ~tudents, schools ace placed in groups so that students within eacn group can be assigned to sc~ools in such numbers as is necessary to achieve tne desired racial composition in eacn school. see Addendum lA. 3. Children entering tne first grade after May l, 1978, as well as all cnildcen ent-=ring tne district from anutnec scnoo1 district afte, May i, 1978, will enter the District pupil assign~ent plan dccording to tne last nane of tne cnild shown on nis official b1rt:h certificate (or n1s previous scnool record if he is -:ntectng Ecom anotner sc:1001 -:i..\ntn..:::t) -,nd will continue in the r:otation cycle und-:r tnat: n.l:ne. 4. Kindergar:ten students ar:e assigned to their neighborhood scnools and ar:e not transported foe purposes of racial oalance. 7nis Nas approved by the court in Davis v. 3oar:d of Ed., 362 f.Supp. 730 (E.D. Ack. 1973) -2- 00086 5. alacK students living in predominately white aceas and white students living in predominately clack aceas ace not oused oc tcansfecced. Tne questions and answers concerning tne District's student assignment plan (Addendum 18) ace puolisned in August of each year dnd mailed to all patrons of tne Nortn Little Rock Scnool 01stcict. The decision of the Court of Appeals directs tnat the student population in the District n~ve ~ cacial composition within 25% of tne racial composition of the District as a wnole. Mem. Op. at 62\n778 E'.2d at 435. The NLRSD has 4,620 elementary students of #nom 2,467 (57.9%) ace nonolack and 1,793 (42.1%) a,~ olacK. Tt1us, in order to meet the +25% standard, eac:1 school must nave a nonolack population betwe~n 42.4% and 73.4%, i.~., 57.9% ~ 15.5%. All tne elemdntacy scnools in the Distc1ct ace pcesent1y in compliance wit~ tnis .\ntandard. JJNIOR HIGH SC~OOLS Junior nigh sc~ools, grades eight and nine, ace also assigned cy zones. :ne only exc~ption to tnis is an acea bounded on the east oy Intecstatd 30, on cne sout, and wouthwest by tne Ac1\u0026lt;ansas Riv~,, and on ti1~ ,10,tn oy Twenty-s~cond Street. See Addendum lC. alack students in this area ace assigned to Ridgecoad Junior Hign Scnool\nall other students ace assigned to Rose City Junior Hign School. ~a.en junior nigh ~~hool reflects the racial make-up of the -3- 00087 oistcict. ':'hese zones will be changed if and when necessacy to maintain the racial oalance within the District. One school, central Junior Hign, serves ali seventn graders in tne Distcict. T~e j nice nigh schools in tne Distcict have a student population tnat is 63.8% nonolacK and 36.2% black. See Addendum lD. The nonblack population in each scnool must oe between 47.8% and 79.8% nonblack, ~' 63.8% + 16.0%. All junior high scnoois in the North Little RocK School oistcict satisfy tnis standard. See Addendum 1D. SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS The s~nioc hign school ooundacies wee~ dcawn in 1970 so tnat each high scnool's racial ~ake-up ceflected tne rac1al make-up of the District. These ooundaries nave not been cnanged. They ~ill oe cnanged if and when necessary in ocdec to keep eacn scnool racially oalanced. The Ccial com~osition of the District's senioc nign schools i3 67.2% nonblack and 32.8% olacK. Tnus, ~~en sc:1OO1 must nave a nonolacK population oec,1een 50. H and 64. 0%, ~' ,0. 7.2% + 16.8%. -:-ne senioc nign scnools in ':ne Uoc::1 L.i.ttle ~oci\u0026lt; s.::1OO.L Distcict satisfy tnis r~4uic~!nent. STUDE~T orsrRI3UT[ON NORTH AND sou-HOF [-40 The following scnools aca locat~rl soutn of Int~c~cate 40: ELEMENTARY Argenta Boone ?arK Glenvie.., Lyncn Drive Meadow ParK J?ine -4- SC:CONDArtY Ole Mai:1 Hign School Rose City Junior Hign Scnool Centcal Junior Hign Scnool 00088 Red .. ood Ros~ City seventh Stceet Bacing Ccoss Centec Skills Centec 7he follow1ng schools ace located nocth of Intecstat~ 40: Amooy aelwood cr:est .. ood Indian Hills Lai\u0026lt;ewood tl or t :1 Hoi: g ht s ?ac1\u0026lt; :UU P11\u0026lt;e View SECONDAaY Northeast Hign Scnool LaKewood Junior: Hign School Ridgeroad Junior High Scnool A ma9 snowing tne appcoximate location of all Nor:th Little Rock Schools is attacned as Addendum lC. The cacial composition of tne Distcict as a whole is 61.8% nonolacl\u0026lt; and 38.2\\ olacl\u0026lt;. 7nus eacn acea must oe oetween 46.3\\ and 77.3% nonolac1\u0026lt;, i.e., 61. 8% data in ~ddenda 1~ and lJ discloses tnac tne cacial composition of all scnools nor:tn of I-40 is 65.0% nono1ac1\u0026lt; and 35.0% alack and of tnose scnools soutn oc I-40 the composit1on Ls 58.2% none Lac!\u0026lt; and 41. 3~ oldci\u0026lt;. :'nis is .. itnin tne st\nndard set O'J tne Couct oc ~991:als. -5- 00089 SCHOOLS GROUP A LAKEWOOD CRESTWOOD BELWOOD PINE TOT.A.LS GROUP 8 PIKE VIEW ARGENTA TOTALS GROUP C GLENVIEW LYNCH DRIVE TOTALS GROUP D AMBOY INDIAN HILLS SEVEN7H STREET BOONE PARK 'i:'OTALS GROUPE PARK HILL NORTH HEIGHTS REDWOOD 7OTA.LS GROUP F MEADOWPA RK ROSE CITY ':'OTALS BARING CROSS* DISTRICT TOTALS NORTHL ITTLE ROCK ELEMENTARYSC HOOLS RACIAL COUNT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 1985 EXCLUDINGK INDERGARTENS TUDENTS NONBLACK No. ( % ) 143 (63.6) 100 (57.1) 61 (55.0) 93 (53.l) 397 (57.9) 234 (60.6) 97 (53.9) TIT (58.5l 104 (58.8) 123 (51.0) TIT (54.3) 172 (58.l) 209 (63.5) 169 (57.ll 239 (54.8) 789 (58.l) 116 (61.7) 238 (63.2) 133 (54.1) 487 (61.0) 117 (56.5) 116 (53.5) 233 (55.0) 3 ( 30. 0) 2,467 (57.9) B~ACK No. ( % ) 82 (36.4) 75 (42.9) 50 (45.0) 82 (46.9) 289 (42.l) 152 (39.4) 83 (46.1) 11'\"5(' 41. 5) 73 (41.2) 118 (49.0) TIT (45.7l 124 (41.9) 120 (36.5) 127 (42.9) 197 (45.2) 560 (41.9) 72 (38.3) 127 (34.:3) l13 (45.9) 312 (39.0) 90 (43.5) 101 (46.5) 191 (45.0) 7 (70.0) 1,793 (42.ll TOTALS 225 175 111 175 686 38 6 180 )66 177 241 418 29 6 3 29 296 436 1357 188 365 246 799 207 21 7 424 10 4, 260 *Bacing Ccoss was cceated as an altecnative to placing sevec~ly nandicapped cnildcen in state institutions. Tne only stuJents assigned to tnis scnool ace tnose who ac~ pcofoundly and multiply nandicapped. 00090 I 1. Q. CONcn.'fING THE ll:VIS!Z\u0026gt; ~ARY SCSOOL DESEC?-ECA'l'!ONP U.\"f /~c(j_t. o FOR THE NOl!H Lim.E ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT -~_if What about children ia:'\"the same family vho have different names? A. A child who enters tba School District after ~ay 1, 1978, as a first grader or aa a newcomer to the district on any grade level vill be placed in the pupil uaignment rotation according to his/her last nace as it appears 011 the official birth certificate. Special consideration cannot be given to families vhose members have different lat names. 2. Q. After the number of uaignments have been made in the spring to achieve the proper racial balance, vhat provisions vill be made to protect that balance from losses resulting from moving during the su=er? A. An additional 10 percent vill be selected as a standby list. 3. Q. Will the elementary schools continue to operate on a staggered time schedule? A. Yes, this is necessary to p:-e:ent s:\n.\n:ie:.:z fro:: ha\ning t,j ... it at school longer than is desirable. It should be noted that no child .n.!.l be t=a~sported more than 7.5 miles one vay\ntherefore, the s:aggerec tice schedule causes only slight dif:erences in school schedules. 4. Q. Can a student avoid being transported if he/she attend~~ private school during the year(s) he vas assign~J to a school outside his neighborhood? A. Any movement vithin the District will place the student i~ the rotation plan or assignment present!.} i:1 effect in the attenda:-:ce zone where he will be residing. If a student attencs a private sc~cc~ ~e rec~~~~ to the ~orth Little ~ock Pu~lic Scheets. 00091 5 .. Q, Where do stuaents attend school vho enroll after the school year begins? A. Students will b usigned according to their place in the alphabetical rotation system. 6, Q. Are the loading and unloading of buses used to transport children supervised? A. Yes, principals and teachers supervise the loading and unloading of each bus. 7. Q, Where do buses load and unload? A. The neighborhood elementary school will be the pick-up point for all children being transported. 'No stops will be made to receive or discharge pupils at any other point. It is the parent's responsibility to deliver children to the neighborhood school\nit is the district's responsibility to return the children to the neighborhood school in the afternoon. In case the student is late and does not board the bus at the neighborhood school, it is the responsibility of the parent to transport the child to the school he/she attends. 8. Q. When this plan was revised, were any changes made in the elementary attendance zones? A. Yes, minor changes were made to alleviate crowding in cwo schools. The zones were revised so that some students who would have attended Crest~ood Elementary will now attend Indian Hills, Soree students who would have attended Crestwood will now attend Lakewood, and scree students who would have attended Saventh Scree~ will no~ attend Redvoo~. 00092 9. Q. How were the groupings of schools determined? A. Using the percentages of 42 percent black and 58 percent nonblack students as a goal for each groupings, factors such as the racial composition of attendance zones, the present enroll~ent of each school and the capacity of each school were considered. 10. Q. Will any student be exempt from assignment outside their neighborhood? A. Yes, kindergarten students and students who live in an elementary zone with a racial CO!lll)osition such that their race is in the minority. Also, there may be instances where some handicapped children will not be transported although it is the general policy of the district to include special education students in the pupil assignment plan. There are children whose handicapping condition requires a particular special educ3tion program which may not be available in every school. It is also necessary to consider the number of students who can be accommodated in a particular program in a school since it is essential that enroll=ent in special education classes be sc3ll enough to allow for as much individual atte~ticn as is needed for each child. Exceptions rnay also ~e made for children with a medical disability if the situation ~arrants. These must be considered on an individual basis. 00093 STAFF RECRUITMENT PLAN NORTII LITTLE HOCK runL lC SCIH)OL\n, 1,--------------------- ,. ...,...,,.~ .,. ..... ,, ,,111 ... , 1 .,. ... ,. .., a .I. .......... , ~ fl,.,.,.. l'\nnL , . \"''\"'\"'\" \" ti\"-:mit: 1, ,  ,,:111 '''\"\"'  '\"lt.._, .. tJ ...I )n,h lhh~ Ill. ~k.-,t.,. 1.a,L II. N,,.,h 11.-irtw, I! l'L 11,11 IJ l'il..- \\'k u. l'iu\u0026lt; \" th',1...-.,J '\"M ,,..,(.'.i t\u0026gt; 11. '.'M.hnth su~1 \"'\"'\"' 1111h S.l,,,.,h IM C.totul ('I I aL.,.,.,J ~ kiolrcu,,J 21. ku-.c l i11 lll11t S. ..... .._ .? ? Nut1ltla,1 11 Ilk M\noin 2-1 I, .. ,. IJ.nioa (. '\"'' ( cmn lJ. I'\"' 'ilifh t \"\"'\"' --- \" Ridgeroad Junior High-black students' Rose City Junior Jllgh-white students 0 e .. ,.( . ... ,( C\n---- 0 I lul, kJ \\ UIIII) l lnt'I \"'\"'\" ..\" ,.., ,. ' ' .., Ol 0 0 0 SCHOOLS CENTRAL LAKEWOOD RIDGEROAD ROSE TOTALS SCHOOLS NORTHEAST OLD MAIN TOTALS SCROOLS Baring cross NORTH LITTLE ROCK PUBLIC SECONDARYS CHOOLS RACIAL COUNT AS 0~ OCTOBER 1, 1985 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS NONBLACK BLACK TOTALS No. ( % ) No. ( % ) 423 ( 61. 0) 270 ( 39. 0) 693 348 ( 69. 0) 156 ( 31.0) 504 413 ( 6 4. 0) 23 2 (36.0) 645 274 ( 61. 6) l 71 ( 38. 4) 445 1,458 ( 6 3. 8) ~ ( 3 6. 2) 2,287 SEtlIOR HIGH SCHOOLS NONBLACK BLACK TOTALS No. ( % ) No. ( % ) 769 ( 7 3. 5 J 2 27 ( 26. 5) 1,046 665 ( 61. 1) 424 ( 38. 9) 1,089 1,434 ( 67. 2) 70i ( 3 2. 8) 2,135 aARING CROSS* ( Scnool foe multiple handicapped) NONBLACK BLACK TOTALS No. ( % ) .l O. ( % ) 7 ( 22. 3 l 23 ( 7 6. 7) 30 *Baring Cross was cceat~d as an alternative to placing sev~cely nandicapped cnildcen in state institutions. The only students assigned to this scnool ace tnose wno ace ?Cofoundly and multiplf nandicapped. 00095 C/'t-3 :i:,i \"rj 1-:,?\nl::t?j n ?\nl::c::: H \u0026gt;-3 z~ \u0026gt;-3 STAFf RECRUIT~ENT ?LAN ~he Eighth Circuit directed tne Noren Little RocK Scnool District to develop a plan to comply with earlier decrees regarding inc:easing the representation of alacks as principals and administrators in tne North Little Rock scnool District. To ensure that a greater numoer of olack applicants ace attracted to teacning positions wnich would improve the pool of qualified applicants for administrative positions, and in order to meet the scandards set oy applicaole law, the North Little Rock scnool Discrict proposes the following components of a comprenensive recrui=ment plan. INTERNAL ACT!VI~IES 1. The District ,\nill develop a oudget that anticipates activities related to all components of the plan and provides the necessary funding for these activi:ies. 2. North Lit=le 2oc1\u0026lt; Scnool District personnel wil_ oe notified of ~~canc~-=s in ddministtative and principal positions and ~iLl oe ~ncouraged to apply. 3. ?eriodica1.:.:r, tne :iocth Little Roel\u0026lt; Scnool District will conduct an in:ec~sc survey among its teacners and admini~tratocs wit~ the purpo~e uf ~ien=i~ying tnose individuals ',\nno ,,01llr.i os: inter~sted in advancs:ment to administrative or ~rincipal position~. 00096 COLLEGE A~D UNIV?RSITY CONTAc:s colleges and universities are perhaps tne oest 5ource oE qualified applicants Eoc teacning positions. ~~erefoce, tne District will contact these institutions foe the purpose oE recruiting qualified black applicants. 1. The District will identifJ regional colleges and universities wnic~ nave strong teacner education programs witn significant black enrollment. 2. The District will identiEy regional universities having post graduate education programs witn significant black enrollment for tne purpose of soliciting olacK applicants for administcat1ve positions. 3. Tne uistrict will contact tnose instit~tions identified in paragrapos land 2, as well as otners, using a letter of introduction (~ddendum 2A) and will provide tnem ~ith a ococnuce containing ori~f infcc:na::.ion aoout tne 9istrict, occupational o~por~uni~ies ~nd ~  pioyee bene~its\nan Equal Opportuni~J 2wployer statement\nand a~~: con:a~n~ng otnec pertinent information. 4. District personnel will visit tnose teacnec ::raL~1ng institutions expressing int~cest, witn special e~pnas1s on estaolisned career Jays or special ~vents ~ponsoreJ OJ :ne institutions and witn special attention given to institutions ::.nat nave nistoricaliJ ?reduced greater numoers of clack educators. -2- 00097 5. Disccict pecsonnel will attend visitation seminars at interested institutions at ti~es agreed upon oy the institution and tne District. Pceaccangements and announcements would be made thcough t~e appcopciate officials at the instit tions. 6. The Jistrict will deve op appccpciate ~atecials Eoc distribution to institutions and their interested students, including an intcoduccory letter (Addendum 28)\na description of employee oenefits (Addendum 2C)\na District orocnuce (Addendum 2D)\nan application\nspecific informational items on teacning, coacning, and administrative positions\nnotices on c~rr=nt joo vac~ncies\na scnedule of vis1tations and seminars\nand the brocnure descrioed in paragraph 3 dbove. COMMUNITYA C7IVITIES Anotn~r excellP.nt sourc-: ,or recc\nit.:ie\"l:: can be Eound in communit/ f)Cog:a,:is anr.i dCtivities. :o t:1is end, tne Ji5trLct ~ill ensue~ cnac its paccicipation in =ommuni~y pccgc3~s and ac:ivities is consistent wit~ its commit~en:: as an ~qudl o~f)ort~nity dra~loyer. L. alack community leaders will be 1nvic~~ co tal~ ~Lt~ the North Little Rock Scnooi D1stcict concer~ing c:1e e~ploy~~nt of alack administ:3tocs. 2. The Jistrict will also contact community organizations, such as tne Uroan League of Greater Li:tle RocK, ~hicn ~covLde employment cececrals for olack professionals. -3- 00098 - PROFESS:ONAL ASSOCIATIONS Placement services provided by proEessional associations :or their members is an additional method of rc~r~i.t~ent. 1. The 0istric: will identiEy tnose educational organizations wnicn could serve as a source of olack appl:cants for administrative positions. 2. T~e ~iscri.c~ ~ill contact those organizations which provide employrnenc information and will provide them with relevant materials regarding employment with the ~LRSD. 3. Where appropriate Discrict personnel w:11 actend regional or national confecences sponsoce\u0026lt;l oy ?roEessional associations Eoc tne purpose oE recruiting administcati'le personnel. OTHER OU1SIDE AC~!VI~I~S 1. Recru1:ment activities will ce administered oy tnose ~ully aware of tne Jistci~ts non-disccimina~ion and equal ernp:oymenc oppoccunity policies. 2. ~ecruit::io::nt ~:\u0026gt;rograrns rnay oe neid in nocel/:.iotel conf?cence cooins 1n cii:io::s considered a :,:,cur.11.,\ni.ns.\nourcc 0f. .\n19pli.-:ant3 - Eor e:\u0026lt;ampie, Mem~nis, Ttl\nJackson, :1S\nJacon ::tuuge, i:..A. Suen programs would oe preceded oy extdnsive local !\n)Ublicity. 3. It ,1ill oe cne pollcy oE tne ~locth Little ,:\\CC'\u0026lt; scncol Disi:cict to nocify in ~citing all recruitment suuccas and to state i.n ill recruiting materials, includin1 news9dpec advertisements, that it is an \"Equal Opportunity Emplot~c. -4- 00099 PROFESS:ONAL ASSOC:ATIONS Placement secvices provided by proEessional associations :or their members is an additional method of re~c~i::.~ent. 1. The Jistric: will identiEy tnose educational organizations wnicn could serve as a soucce of clack applicants for administcative positions. 2. T~e Jistri.ct ~ill contact those organizations which provide employment information and will provide them with relevant materials regarding employment with the ~LRSD. 3. Where appropriate District personnel will attend regional or national confecences sponsored oy professional associations foe tne purpose oE recruiting administrati~e personnel. OTHER OU1SIOE AC~!VI~I2S l. Recru1::.ment activitLes will oe adminis::.eceJ oy tnose ~ully awace of tne Jistri~ts non-discrimination and equal employment opportunity policies. 2. ~ecruit::ient programs may be neld in noc:el/:.iote.!. conf:!cence cooi.ls u1 ci::i1:s consider.:ed a pc0m1si.ns source vi:. 19pli-:ant.\n- Eoc e:\u0026lt;ampie, Mem9nis, Ttl\nJackson,\n1S\nJaton ~ouge, C,A. Suen programs would oe preceded oy ex::.~nsive local publicity. 3. It  .. i 11 oe the policy of tt1e tloc:::.h Little ~eek Scncol Dis:c:ict to notify in ~citing all recruitment suucc2s dnd to state i.n ill recruiting materials, includinJ newspd~ec advertisements, tnat it is an \"C:qual Op~,ortunity Emplof~r. -4- 00099 4. ~he Distcict will pccduce a 10-minute slide snow oc videotape pcesentation desccioing the Distcic: and occupational oppoct nities 1n the District foe ,1se at ceccuitment sites. 5. When appcopciate, the Distcict will advectise teacning and administcacive vacancies in newspapecs and othec wedia in communities that have colleges and univecsities tacget2d foe ceccuitment efforts. -5- 00100 ! I AddendumA Add.JA uIMI~1 trr@mu!llLiIi luu!L~m @~~ ~@IID!Lr~r~~ IMI@@!L~ ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 2700 POPLAR Sii=lEET January 14, 1986 ME1'T0 O: Officers of Teacher Training Institutions FROM: Doyle Crownover, Assistant Superintendent for Administration SUBJECT: Employment Applications The North Little Rock Public Schools seeks to staff its schools with the best teachers available. To be able to do this, we covet opportunities to consider your teacher candidates. Toward this end we have prepared material that gives prospective teacher applicants information concerning employment in the District. We are eager to have this information placed in the hands of all potential teachers, and solicit your assistance in this effort. We would welcome calls or visits from your teacher candidates, and would be happy to visit your campus to talk wi:n groups of prospects if it appears this would be mutually beneficial. NORTLHI TTLER OCKS CHOODLI STRICTIS ANE QUAOLP PORTUNIETMYP LOYER P.O. SOX 687. NORTH LITTLE ROCK. AA 72115/CE87 5011758-1760 00101 AddendumB Al~(. J /J u'.I=J~~ ~ulliJ rL,JrJuib~~ @~~ ~l::IDrr,,~rr~~n =J@/1~ ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 27C0 POPLAR STREET The North Little Rock (Arkansas) School District is seeking an opportunity to consider for employment the most outstanding teaching and administrative candidates available. If you desire to be a part of the professional staff of a public school district that is recognized as being a state leader in learning opportunities and student performance, we earnestly solicit your application. We ask you to examine the enclosed materials tJ acquaint you with the advantages and desirability of employment with the North Little Rock School District. If beccming associated with this District appeals to you, we encourage you co complete and return th~ application form. P.O. 8OX687. NORTH LITTLE 9CCK. AA 72115/C687 501/758-1760 00102 Adcendum C iiorth Little Rock, Ar~ansas Benefits of Teaching in North Little Rock School District Sal arv Teachers are paid on an indexed sa ary scale that rec:gnizes training and experience. Increments are provided for each 12 hours of graduate st dy beyord the Bachelor's Degree, and for each 15 hours beyond the ~as~er's, and for each year's experience up to eight years at the Sachelor's Degree level, and up to 15 years at the Specialist's Degree level.  For the 1985-86 school year the salary for a regular classroom teacher of 187 days of employment '\"'ith a Bachelor's Degree and no previous experience is $14,530. A teacher with a Specialist's Degree and 15 years experience receives $25,611. Fringe Senefi ts Each teacher is provided a fully paid Blue Cross-o ue Shield 11ajor\n-ledical Coverage, a dental insurance coverage, and a hospital iridernnity plan, 'Nith the option of having f~nily members included through payroll deduction. ~e provide $21,000 life insurance coverage on each ~eacher. Each teacher is provided an amount of S15.83 per month ',ihich may be applied to the :::ost of family coverages, or for additional life insurance. The total value of these coverages is $91.93 per month. Al 1 teachers must be members of the Arkansas Teacher Rei::~rement Syste,n. Beginning on July 1, 1986, they '.iill have t~e oo:ion of joining the co1tributory plan (63 of salary) or non-contribucory ~lan (Q~ of salary). Those choosing the contributory system .~ill qualify for a greater ari:iui:y uoon retire1,1ent. Deferred tax opticns are also available for rer:irement planning. Teachers also participate in the Social Security retire,.1erit system. Si ck ~eave Teachers in the tlorth Little Rock system receive 1i:1e days per year sick leave for- the first four years in the Distric:. These days per year then increase for each of next six years until 20 days oer year are awarded for the terich year and thereafter. Unused sick days c.re ac:::u111ulated up co 100 days. Perso,al Leave Teachers of the District are awarded one day per year of leave for personal reasons. There is an accu1,1ulation provisio:1 for :nese ddyS if tl1ey are unused. 00103 Page 2 (Benefits of Teaching in North Little Rock School Oistric~) Inservice Training The North Little Rock School District maintains an ongoing, indepch program for increasing the competency of its staff. The program is constantly revised and adapted to the needs of the staff. Profess iona 1 Le~ve Upon approval of request, teachers are granted professional leave for a wide variety of activities. 00104  Addend1JTD1 NORTH LITTLE ROCK PUBLIC SCHOOLS-- jf - - ... -~- --=--- -- .~ ,,____ :.::-:.-\n-~ iii:.~.. ~~\n~~-~{\n-:.--,~,,--~._~ _\n_ moving in the right direction, helping every child achie\\'e Cl) \"'d l:rj n H\ni:,, t'1 tJj c:, c:::: n\ni:,, t-3 H az From the Superintendent ~.:.:\"':'-S_ - .--- a\n:.\n.\nWe are pleased chat you wane co icnow about public schools in Sorth Lmle Rocle.T his brochure ,,.,II~ ve you some basic fac-...asb out our schools. students. teach~ and educmonal programs. We hope you will also \\1Sit our schools to see for yourself why we have one of the state's best school systems. Quality education has been a standard in the :'-forth Little Rock School D1stnct since the first school door opened in 1901. Since then. the Discncr has grown to approximately 30 square miles W'lth 15 schools serving nearly 9.500 students, the founh largest in Arlcansa.s. Along with growth in siz.e and enroUment. the District has also grown in educational stature to become a recognized leader in learning opportunities and student performance. To ensure individual student growth, school cumc-.ilum 1s broad in scope while empha.sizmg basic slcills in re:iding, commurucanon and computation. ,\\II schools have earned accredJCat1ons tatus by the ~Orth Central Acc:-editauon Assoaat1on, and all are rated A\" by the State of Arlcansas. Public support for our schools is reflected through Parent Teacher Assoc1at1ons (PTA). the Dmr:ct PT A Council. advisor\ncommitt~ and ocher groups. The District enJoys the help of patrons through the Volunteers in Public Schools program. Through these :ind other eiforu. community members are involved in the educatton of our children. The School Board and ,he staif agree with the public th.it schools are rlaces for karn1ng. and the~ belie\\e in strong, fair dbc1piine m the ~ch1A.b. The result 1s the !aclc of senous disciplinary problem~ that disrupt the educational process. We like co thinlc of our ciscnct as responsive to community needs. Please fee! free to cill upon me. our ~nncipals or any of our staff for 1nfor.nat1on or to e:~press vour concerns. I believe that when schools and homes work together, life imprO\\e5 for everyone wtthin sc:iool distr:ct bcundar.es. I urge you co ccamme our s.:nocis and join us in support oi our public school SYStem and our commumt\\. Joe -\\u~11n, Ed. D. Sup,=rinrendenr bf S.::iool,  Addendun D NORTH LITTLE ROCK PUBLIC SCHOOLS-- =~ - ----\ni-:P: .. .f--.-- -~-- ~-:=~--\n~-s, i_~__:_ ~.. ~ ==-.' ~-, ---~~-.-\u0026lt; \\. ..~. - moving in the right direction, helping every child achie\\e en \"'d trj n H :i=t- 1 t:r:I t, c::: n :i=- 1-3 H 0 z \"'d t-1 :i=z Twelve ways we help children achieve ...  a comprehensive. coordinaled cumculum that stresses basic skills in reading, ~ommunication and computation  an expcnen~. highly trained and dedicaled st.1ff, nearly half oi whom hold masler's deye:s  a regular program of curnculum n:newal and textbook evaluation  guidance and counseling services al all elementar)' and =onda.ry schools  a gifted and talented program for e!emencary and junior high children  computer assisted instruction projects with more than 300 microcomputers available to students  a range of high school course offerings for vocational. coll~e-bound and handicapped students  a range c,f \u0026lt;peciai educanon\n~:\", 11:es wah Ll!d1v1d~: 1! education pl:l~s  advance plact:ment classes for\ne,:ondary students  :ict1ve parent involvement through PT A's. PT A Council. ad,isory commmees and booster clubs  an eifec{lve disciplinary program wnh i:,aremal input  low studenu teacher ratios ana high\n,er-pupil e:\u0026lt;~ nditures for effec:1ve dassroom learning moving zn the right direction, helping every child achieve 00108 Educational Programs North Linle Rocle teachers believe that all chtldren may learn - the vocauonaJ student. the coUegebound srudent. the student Wlth spe-=:al gifts and the handicapped student. They re:ogmze :hat each chlld has an individual learning pattern. and they encourage each to progress according to his or hc=r best ab1liucs. Careful appraisal. frequent evaluation and nexible grouping ensure that each chlid W'IU receive instrucuon according to idem1iied srrengths and needs. The curriculum at seventeen elementary schools places primary emphasis on the basics of reading. spdling, English. mathemano. '4nting, social studies. science and health. Children also pamcipate in music. an and physical education acuvmes. Mastery of learning skills in each subJect is stressed. :ind career awareness is a component in many of the basic subject.S. The Junior high provdes a period of transition from the elementary si:hool to senior high schoob. Tne tranmion covers aJl areas or s.:hool life: academic. CO-c'Jrricular and soc:al. All seventh-grade students attend Central Junior High. Three other junior high schools se:-.e students in gr:\n::::\neight and nine. At the junior high level, connnued emphasis 1s placed on the indi\\1duaJ and on basic skills instruction. while a wider scope of insr.rucr:onal programs and co-curricular aci:1vities is introduced. In additton to basic disciplines. junior high ~rudents may selet:r electives in modern foreign languages, 1ndustnal am. home economi.:s. expl0ratory busine,s, :in. commumc: irions. choral music and band. lntrodu~1ions to competitive athletics. stude:,~gove-:nment, sp1nr clubs and special interest organiutions encourage self-Je_ velopment an9 pre\n:,aranon for high school. Two high schools sene students in grades ten through twei,e '4'ith a comprehensi\\e course of srud~ based on the distncr's commnment to prov,d1ng J c!assical colkge preparatory cumculum :ind career preparation programs. A strong basic academic program and J \\\\tde range of decti\\es in tine arts. fure1gn languag~. forensics. business and \\O.:at1onaltecnn1cal skills offer :i :nultnude of options to hq\nh school\ntude~r~. . .\\ te:i\u0026lt;:hin! ,tJ!T oi more than 550 d\nis\nroom in\u0026lt; rru,:ors prc,,1des for :in erie::t1ve a,erage 1eac~cr,1.. 1J.:m rauo of vnc: w ,\u0026lt;!,cnt.:en. movmg in the right direction, helping every child achieve Gifted Education More than 500 students pamciparc in spec,al programs for gifted and talented children in kindergarten through grade nine. Placement is based on case studies of students who demonstrate outstanding intelligence. ability, c:-e:iovHy and task commitment. Placement is documented by test data. teacher input and parent input. Gifted dementary students are assigned :o regular classrooms tor basic mstrucuon and receive additional instrucoon from a gifted.' talented resource teacher. Junior h1~h\ncudems arc placed in duster classes usuall~ in :he areas of E:1glish. mathematics. science and social studies. Addicional mstrucnon is also a\\ailablc from resource teachers. and a separate gifted math program provides au:~iliary opponuni.' ties for elementary and junior h:gh students two evenm. sessic:,s pe~ '-': ::le sc:-.:ondary scuden,~ a, ,he ju.-:ior and ~c:r.ior high leveb may tx placed in honors classes based on grades. ta.\nhe:- rec0mml!n.i\n,rion~ and ~tandardized test scores. The total gifted program ensures the mastery of basic skills while offenng t1e:(ibilicy, independent inquiry. ennchment. ,11.:.:dc:rationa nd ht~her :e,el :earn::, g a\n::t\\'t!:~. :. Special Education Special education ser.1ces enable approxuna:ely 1,500 handicaoped stude:,ts to receive maximum educat1onal be.-:eiits chrough individual programs. Learnmq n~..s are dete!inlned by a crained staff of special ~ucac1on ccach~ and school psvchologists. They work closely w1th students and parents to develop mdhidual cducauon plans. The 'ionh Lmle Rod .. schools are dedicated to the ::,roposmon rhar rhe -ruder.: ,,.,rh s~:i! :-:ee--s..hsc :.:!:i noc be 1solate-J from pee:-s. HandicipfX(i scuJent, ar~\n,lac~ in spcc::ll .:lasses or regular classes, de~ndtn!! er. the :e::\n: ::i::~e5: cf :he students. Plac:mem 1s based on hancicappmg conditions and accompanytnll educauor.ai deficits. E,e:-y effon 1s made :o ::.-:su~ e\nrucenrs :~! a par. vf :he scnool e:1,1ror.~e::t. A, \\4 1Ji! ral\n!,C ~i~r V~i::ii7'i' l:i-:!l.des:~ J.SSc!S r~: :,:..:. de:11 w11:, l~r:img ji~actliues. beha\\tOr ad1us,meru ..:las,c:s . .:!asses tor .-:ie~:111~ handicapped scuce~:s. s~rv1~es tor ortho~d1.:a lv handicapped srude:1ts a:::.: s~!'l :he~:i.c, .:ia~,c:~. H::indi,appcd students ma, acce:1d the s:..11~ C ~nee~. :i ,e\n:,arate facdn, ,,.,th 'o:: rnc::al\n::o~:l.:7:S,e :\"- :::\u0026gt;?, c:-:onJary ,cudencs in na,. cta, ,ess1on\u0026lt; c,i1c~e'.\"'. 1ges 5 10 :1 \"'l!h muiur:1e handicap\u0026lt; \":io -.::i.nnL,r: :.rnrnon 1n rhe regular ..:!aS\u0026gt; rovm are\n.\n:-.d ac :~~ 3\ninng Cross c~ni:::. -..h:: fun,lll'llal J ::demi, ,r.,,~\n.i,t1on inC:ude, a rcx:\n.i, 0n , l'~J11un~I ::r~:::-ar:::uc~. Student~ \"n,\"c: mc:.J,, . : ... ,rhilf1\\,r~ ..:.:.:::-_ i1 .. ~-\n-_. ..: :en Jt h,)r:-:~.l ~~ \\c:!~\\:.:J =-'' .. t lh':~:.\"\" \"I' - : . ..! ... 7\n::- Computer Education Recognizing the tremendous impact oi computer technology on learning styles. teaching techniques. occupational skills and car~r choices, the d1stnct 1s committed to a comprehensi,e program of computer educ.'.ltion. :'viore than .300 microcomputers are available to students distnctw1de. Computer literacy in grades kindergarten throu2h twelve incroduc::-\nscudencs to the fundamental skills ne-.\n:ss:ir:\n:o li.-c and -... nr~ in a high-!~h sv..:ic:::. C-Jmputer i1tc:rat:y 1s de,eioped throu2h seconda\n..,. Lour~~ in co1:1pu_tesrc ience. as well as ~omputeras\n!~! ed ?nstr!.!:t:on:~ :!~::id::-:-:::i:r e:s a: all grade level.\n. Compl!ter science courses include insm.iction in computer languages and programming skills. Thev rre\n:,are stuaerm tor\n:,ost-se-:ondary e.,penenc:s in .om\n:,1.\n:::r-\neiaccd,\nel-:l\nihruu~h ..:ollege c:t.lu1.:auun, ,ocat1onal edu.:auon or on-1he-J0b tra1mn2. Computer ass1s,ed and computer ma~a2ed instruc: 1on are ,1e\"'ed as ,iul assets in manv cu~cular areas. \\.1i..:ro.:ompucers ~sis1 students in.masterv oi basic skills in mathematics. i-eading and lan2~a2e arts. Cumput~r :i:\n,ist~.! instruction supplement\nre~ular .:!a~sroom ac:1\\ ll1es but does not replace bas~.: 1n,truct1on. .:la,,room te-st1o r home,...ork. .\\s a result of :he distnct\"s .::ommnment tu ..:omputer 1nstrut:11ona. Nor:.th Little R0t:k juni,ir h12h .,.a. s \u0026lt;cks.:tc:Jt~! a \\ite ior a t\"'0-' ear pilnt pro~rJm throuizh the \\fi,rP,0rr.r.utc~ Pt,,e:: it,r \\r\\.\nJn\u0026lt;J\u0026lt; l\n.1,,\n,,,,\n1, tl\\fl \\l~L , 1\n\"1::\"\"\n,:.. Jii,.\n... r i1r.d11 .. :..1I :::~:11 .. Vocational Education Voc:rnonal education is another way Nonh Little Rock ~hools prepare students for life after graduation. Educat0rs believe that those studentS who s-eek e:noloyment after high school should have encry-leve! Job skills to accompany their basic academic kno\"' ledge. The combination be:ter prepares them for producuve cmzenship. Studem.s may e!~t ro attend vocational edu.:auon courses 1n business education. home econom1cs. markeung and industnal ans. Pract1c.'.lal .n.s courses inc!ude computer onented ao:ounting, intem1,e office laboratory, shonhand. typewming, marketing. merchandising, child care, home economics. auto mechanics. construcuon. electronics, graphic arts and power mechanics. E ~ploratory courses ~n at the juruor high school level. Cooixrati\\e programs. invo!v1r.g on-th:-jot: training:. ar~ lature:i Jl tne high school !~,cl. The.e indude cooc\u0026lt;:rat1,e orfice edu.:auon. markeuniz. distnbutive ec~cat1on. occ11r\ni1i0nal home ~on~m1\u0026lt;.:s ar.d 1ndustr.al cooperau\"e training. Athletics .\\thieuc, for t,n,, J:,c~, and g:r!s Jie ~ :m::o:-:::-,: pan oi school life in .'ionh Lmle Rock. Secondar\\ studc!nt\nmav par,1,:pate in iootball. basJ..e::-ai!. track and rield. golf. vollevball and :enms :e:ims. H,gn schools ..:orr.pe:e in :~e 4A .::omoeuuon di\\!s10n. :he d1,111on 01 school, \"1th the scares :arsest c!nrollmc!:m. E!ig:1ctl1:f\\ ur par:i 1rat1un in athletic JCtl\\ 1t:e-si, ~0, .:rnc:ub ~ the .l..ri...1r.s:.1. is.. cti\\lues. .\\ssoc1au0n. In gen.:rJI. ,t1 .. .:::n1, mu\u0026lt;t ra,\u0026lt; ,hr~ JCademK ,ut-_1::--.::, 1r0111 :h.: ,:-r~-~~uin-~.: :-nesterf or clt\"g1btl1t\\. 00111 Excellent Performance North Little Rocle students consmemly score at or above the state and nauonaJ norms on standardized tests: and in general. scores improve each :,-ear. The .\\.letropolitan Achievement Test is administe:-ed annually to students in grades t,,.,o t.hrough ten. In accordance wnh state regulauons. m1rumum\n:\u0026gt;e!'formance tests are admmmered to students in ades three. sue and eighc. Compome scores on college entrance e.'taminat1ons re\\ea] that North Linle Rock students are more than adequately prepared for academic success aiter high school graduation. Also. as a result oi high scores on the :~auonaJ Ment Scholarship Qualifying r~r. ~rndenrs r~e:ve r~o!,:niuon e:ich year. \\/onh Little Rod high school~ are consistently among :he state leaders in numbers of students rcce1, mg cc:!ege ~cholar\nh1p\u0026lt;t hrough the :--.:ationa\\JJ te:,t Scnoi:i:sn1p e.~aminat1ons. High periorrnance is the result of program de,d- 0r,menr. curriculum renewal Jnd qualiry teJ.::.ing. nrher honors uid a,,Jrds re-:ogr.:ze studenrs for 0utilanding achievement 1n many academic areas ~ach ~ear. s1gnsf:,ing the dismct's commnment to ~.:cat1onal e.\"eUence. Guidance Services Gu1dJnce program\u0026lt; in a:!e:-r.enrarayn d\necondary schools are conmtc:nt \"'irh ,tJte and North Central A~s0\\.1ationr egulations. The progr~s proV1dec oun~ eling for student~. parents and school per~onnd rdat1,e 10 students progress! beha, 1or and per\\on:iJ '.TlJttcr~.P arents and ~rudc,m Jre en,0ur Ji(c:J to \\c:~k !\nUldJncc \u0026lt;er-ic~. Health Services Stude:1r he:ilth\nervi.:es a.re pro,ided by prot'c:ss1onaJ nurses \"'ho ,tar'f the dimes at ach school. The -chool nurse\nror.iores health educarion. provides e'.Tlergen.:,: :.~: :o r suc.lde:,i llness or injurv and prc,1de~ ,1~100 Jnc ~e:mng sc~eensngs. The nur,e \"L'r~~ \"1th paren!\u0026lt; Jnd the s,h\u0026lt;..'01s taff in ident1r\\- 1nt.:q uJcn, hc:.dth\n-r. ..c !c:~ .. .!~t .\ne~~ing s.:u:\\:J..::\\,:-. mov11H! 1n rhc righr direcrion, helping erery child achiere  Staff 5upcrior teachen and a strong suppon staff are the most valuable assets in the Nonh Little Rock ,chools. The professional staff renects the high standards of the people who live in the communny and who\n,i.ac: .:ducauon as a top pnoncy for their ctuldren. With an approximate S21.CXXavl ~age. Nonh Little Rocle teacher salanes rank in the top five percent in the state. Nearly half of the staff hold advanced degr~ and cerufo:ation. All principals. supervisors 211d te:iche:-s rec~ve training in improving 1nstruc- 11onatle chniques and classroom management. Media specialists. special educauon teachers and elementary tc:ache:-so i gifted students complete specially developed management sessions. ~1any tcai:hers participate in proies.s1onal organizations such as the Arkansas Assoc,auon of Professional Educators (AAPE). :he :\\m~c:in Feeention of Teai:h,m (AF1) or ihc National Education _.~ssociauon (NEA). Finane1al grants. recognmon grants and honors awan.Jc:-tJu ta.:hcri iet1.:c, ,he -=~=:cateds\n,int of al! proressional staff members. In 1981-82 and in 198-4- SS. a \"'onh Lmle Rock teai:her was named Arkansas T ea..:her oi the Y e:ir. and the state runner-up m 1983- ~ ,..as anotr.er :--,ionh Lml.: Ro..:k tea..:her. Discipline The Soard of EJucacion and administration ha~e imple:-ne~ted m.::isures to ensure acceptable benav1or at all sc:iools: Handbooks-based on student, teacher anJ pa,e:it input outline student nghts and re\u0026lt;p0n\u0026lt;1- bdit1~. a~ ,..ell a.~ ,1mer school-relat.:d information. 01,..:1rlinarv ,\nanc:1on, an: .1Jrn111i-1c:r\u0026lt;p'Jru mptl\\ \\\\ :: 1- ..!i :: ,\"~l\"W,_~:. , Administration The adm.mistration of the :--lonh Little Rocle School D1stnct operates under the policies established by a six-member Board oi Educ:rnon. eleced at large. Policies are administered by the supenntendent and four div1s1onaJa ssistant supenntendents for admmistrauon. instrucnon, business affairs and student affau,. D1~tn::\nx:,l!1:1easr e !mplemented and eniorc:d 1n each\nd10vl by the ca.~p:is pnncipal. The Board meets the four:h Tuesday or each month at adm1rumat1\\e offices. :-co Poplar Street . .',,1eetmgs begin ac S\n,.:n. The public 1s encouraged to attend. Curriculum Renewal A ,.\numcc1lumr er:e\"'aJ proJe-::- :.:illedP racucal .. \\p preach to Cumcuium and lnstruct1ona.J Rene,..al (P .. \\CIRJ ensur~ that .:!assroorn IC3!TUnmg ee\"!st he c,pe-.\n:auons vi\"\n:-arencsa na se:ve-,\nt udems. In P.\\ClR. learner goals based on a commun1tv survey ana\nro~ram goai, b~,cJ on a\nur.ey ut edu.:.: itors ~1\\e 111re-:t1otno cur.icuiar ar=. ObJc:-~tt\\e, arc: Jc,duc:-.:1: ,,udent progress 1s measured: student nd, :i.re 1Jc:lllcied: :ind r~ograms. prarn..:es :ind ~esource, are ad_1uste\u0026lt;lT. hus :i.dm1mstrattved ec:s1ons arc b\ni,_.J ,n s:uder.c\n:-err0rmancc data . .:0mrnum1, .Enrolling Your Child Rc:gistration for !le\\1,- srudem.s beg\nr.s in :nid-Au~t\n,.each year. Pupils who are age five before October I rare eligible for kinderganen,enrvllment in neighbor-  hood schools\nKindergarten studems may request to transfer to a school \"'here their race is in the minority. :-.ew students en.roiling in the rirst grade must be six years old by October l. All students new to the district must ,ubmir a complete he:ilth record certified by a licensed physician. No child will be admitted without proof of immunization against poliom~elitis. diphtheria. tetanus. pertu, sis. red measles (rubeola) and German measles (rubella). This information should be presented with a birth cemficate upon registraticn. For additional enrollmenr informarion, parents should contact the principal at the assigned school. Parenc.~ with a.~signmem questions\nhould c:ill the Oifke of Student Affairs. iil-6109. r. Racial Balance Approximately J9 percent of the :'-Jorth Little Rock students are black. and 61 percent are white. :\\t the elementary level. the ratio is J3 percent black to 57 percent white. The district follows a U.S. Federal Court ordered desegregation plan which governs the assignment or students to schools. To ensure that each school building's student population approximately ref1ects the racial makeup of the district, schools are placed in groups for purposes of busing co achieve raciJ.1 balance. Students within e:ich group are assigned to schools in numbers necessary to achieve the desired racial composition. Transrer of students w1thin e:i.::i group is determined by the random selection or a letter of the aiphabet. The initial selection was mad_e in I 9i:!, and a student assignment rotation based on that selection remains in effect. New students enter the assignment plan according co the last name on the students bir:h :::nifiote. Education Expenses in 19~-85, ::ie dismct spent nearly 52.500 for each -:hiid', \u0026lt;!d:1.::ition. With a 1985-86 budget 0f S:6.J 16. l l ::. that figure dimbs to more than 5:.WJ. one or the :o~ ,Jnl.:ings 1n the ~tate in e.xixna1ture, per child. Appru.,imatci, ,.3 per(~nt or\" all revenues are t\"~om lcxal sour.:es ( reJI property Jnd personal propci\nv ta,es1. State sour-:es pro, 1de for J8 percent. Fcdc~JI ,our::::s\n:ro, 1c:~: :inlv ti, e pe~~~rn.J nd four percent ,, t'rom other sour~c~. __ ,._ppr0,1m:ite!v: 3 percent 0r' rhe di,ffict', ~uJ\n~: i\u0026lt; ,rent t'or ,:ilan~. ,l!ld nine pers:ent :,!\u0026lt;X\u0026lt; ,0\" JrJ cmpio, e-e bcneiits. Othc:r c,r,:nJitures are for , ... ,,. rlie\u0026lt; :ind maren:ih. five ~~~~nt: ut1l1t1c~.\n\"our r\u0026lt;:r ,cnt\ndci:lr ,~r, ices. four rcrcent: :ind ti, c per.:~n1 :ur 0th~r c:-.rcn,cs. 00114 (/) rd t\nrj n H ::i:,, t:-1 t,j t:, cn: : ::i:,, 8 H 0 z E.lemtnW'Y Schoob I. Amboy 2. Argent. 3. Belwood 4. Boone Parle 5. Crestwood 6. Glenview 7. Indian Hills 8. Lakewood 9. Lynch Drive I 0. Meadow Park 11. North Heights 11. Parle Hill 13. Pike View 14. Pine 15. Redwood 16. Rose City I 7. Seventh Street JuniOf' Hi1fl Schoob 18. C.:ntral 19. Lakewood 20. Ridgeroad 21. Rose City High Schools 22. Northeast 23. Ole ~1ain ::'.4. The Baring Cross C.:nter Z5. The Skills C.:nter a,-::-.::-~-=~.-:-. _.._ .-. ~ --.:i. . =-=:_~-\n~~~~-:~ :- - ~:.: ~ --  --r--~:_  i: - .~ ..,._ ... ._ -  Information The district publishes a quarterly newsl.:uer to keep parents and other residents iniormc:\u0026lt;l oi progr: ims, activities .md issues. The district welcome-\nquestions and concerns. P:itrons m:iy re:ich th.: lnfor. n:rnL,n ()r'ii.:~ a1 -7 I -Ii I :s :,~:\u0026lt;\"\" e:1~ a.m. an.:! '--- ...0. Club Rd. Counrry Club Wildwood Hwv. ~o ,_ii.,-.r'.:  -.,.. ... --:-..,,:, - ... ,- .. - .. 00116 .....,._:._ .\". I I I     SPECIAL EDUCATION PLAN INTRODUCTION The Court of Appeals has ordered the North Little Rock School District to adopt a ttracially neutral plan evaluating and placing students requiring special education. Mem. Op. at 61, 778 F.2d at 435. In addressing this directive, the NLRSD remains cognizant of several important factors. first, the District is obligated by State and federal law to provide every handicapped child with a free and appropriate education. While classifying black children as in need of special education when, in fact, they do not need it, could be discriminatory and, thus, a violation of the Constitution, the failure to provide.special education to a black child who did need it would be a violation of Public Law 94-1~2 and Arkansas Act 102 of 1973. Recognizing the te~sion between these important public policies, the District conside:s that the emphasis of its special education plan must be an ensuring the accuracy of its evaluation programs and the elimination of any ~asking influence caused by cultural or socioeconomic biases. Second, the District recognizes that the Court oE Appeals' pr~macy concern is with the classification of black students as educably mentally retarded (EMR) and has, therecoce, tJcused ~pecifically on the evaluation, placement and instructional practices related to its mental retardation programs. Third, the District also notes that the evidence giving rise to the Court's findings arose from data collected in 1976 and 1980. 00117 Since 1980, however, significant changes have been implemented in the State and federal regulacions governing evaluation and placement in special education programs, many of which were spec::ically aimed at safeguarding against the misc.assification of students as needing special education. See generally, Referral, P~acernent \u0026amp; Aooeal ?rccedures: For Soec~al Education and Re at~d Services (Ark. Dept. of Educ. 1985) (Addendum 3A\nhereinafter referred to as \"Referral Procedures\") and Program Standards and SLigibility Criteria Ear Soecial Education (Ark. Dept. of Educ. L985). (Addendum 3B\nhereinafter referred to as \"Program Standards\"). With these factors in ~ind, the North Little Rock School District proposes the following plan for implementing a race neutral special education program. STRICT ADHERENCE TO ?ROCEDURAL S~FEGUARDS RSQUI~EJ BY S7ATE GUIDELINES The Arkansas Depart~ent of Education, as :r.e requlat~ry agency responsible for the enforce~ent of t~e Eudcati0n 0f ~he Handicapped Act of 1975, P.L. 94-142, 20 rJ.S.C. 1401 et ~-, has issued detailed regulations governing the cperat:on of special education programs in Arkansas public schools. These detailed guidelines were Eirst issued in L931 and wee~ upda:~d and reissued in 1985. See \"Referral Procedures\" (1981) and \"Program Standards\" (198L) contained in NLRX 28 and Addendum 3A and 3B hereto. -2- 00118 These guidelines incorporate provisions which specifically act as safeguards against i~proper evaluation and placement. ---DUE PROCESS ?RO~~CTIONS In \"ReEer:al Procedures (1981 \u0026amp; 1985), the ~epartment oE Education adopted detailed requirements Eor due process designed to safeguard against the misevaluation oE a child and to ensure that the best educational interests of the child were of paramount importance. The North Little Rock School District complied with these requirements by implementing due process procedures consistent with the State regulations. A copy of the NLRSD's due process procedures are attached hereto as Addendum 3C. for a comple:e understanding of all the details of these procedures, ~ne ~s reEerred to the proce~~res themselves. A surrmary of sc~e Jf the ~ore important :eat~rcs follows: ?arents must be not~:~ed oE every s:ep in the referral, evaluat~Jn and placerr.ent process and given t~e opportunity to attend and participate Ln aLl meet1ngs and conferences. 2. Parents must gi'le their consent teEore any formal evaluation or testing af the child may be done. 3. The parent has the right to be represented by the person of theLr choice at all proceedings. While not required by State or federal regulations, the ~L~S~ provi~es the parents of children being evaluated with a list of indeoendent agencies who provide assistance to parents in this process. See Addendum JD. -3- 00119 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4. No child can be placed in a special education program without either parental consent or court order. 5. The parent may request an independent professional evaluation from a list of twenty-four approved agencies. Addendum 3E. While the NLRSD is required to pay for such an evaluation only in the event the District's evaluation is Eound to be incorrect, the NLRSD has nonetheless paid for every independent evaluation requested in the past even though its evaluations have never been found to be incorrect. The NLRSD will continue this practice to the extent its budget permits. 6. finally, the parent has the right to appeal any evaluation or placement decision to a hearing officer, who conducts a formal evidentiary hearing, and ultimately to a court of competent jurisdiction. See \"Referral Procedures at 24-33 (1985). 7. :n any appeal, the bucjen GE proof as :o any place~ent is upon the school district. See \"Referral ?rocedures a: ,1.B, 9. 24 (t935). a. The ~Laso advises ?arents 0f these rights in writing at the beginning of the referral and evaluation process. ---SAfEGUARDS AGAINST IMPROPER USE Of TEST [~STRUMENTS In addition to the procedural safeguards discussed above which are designed to ensure an open process involving fully informed parents having access to independent review of any decision, the State cequlati0ns firsc adopted in 1981 also require the incorporation of specific safeguards in the assessment process. The most important of these safeguards are as follows: -4- 00120 I I I I r ' I' r I I I I I 1. Tests and other evaluation materials: 2. 3. 4. C: .J. a. b. Have been validated Eor the speciEic purpose for which they are used\nand Are administered by trained personnel in conformace with the instructions provided by their producer. c. Include materials tailored to assess speciEic areas oE educational need and not merely those which are designed to provide a single general intelligence quotient. No single ?rocedure is used as the sole crite:ion for determining an appropriate educational program foe a child. The e~aluation is made by a .multidisciplinary team oc group of persons, including at leas: oJne teacher or other specialist with ~~cwledge in the a:ea of suspected iisajility. The chi:d is assessed :n all areas related to the suspec:ed disability, incL.i.ding, ,1hece a9pr0~c~a-:e, health, 'lision, hearing, social and e~otional status, general intelligence, academic pecfor~ance, communicaci'le scatus, and motor abilities. Intellectual ability mus: je ~easured by an individual intelligence test appropriate to the student and such testing may only be done by a certificated educational examiner, licensed psychologist JC Licensed psychological examiner. See \"Referral i?coceduces at 3-4 ( 1985). -5- 00121 I STATE REGULATIONS SPECIFY WHICH TESTS ~~y SE US2D IN MENTAL RETARDATION ASSESSMENT In furtherance of the requirement that tests ~ust have been validated for the purpose for which they are used, the Arkans?s Department of Education, in its program Standards specifies by name which tests may be validly used for what purpose. 7his is done for each handicap category. The provisions relating to mental retardation assessment are found at pages 13-1 through 13-7 of the \"Program Standards (1985). The North Little Rock School District is in compliance Hith these regulations. It uses no test not specifically approved in these regulations in making final evaluation and placement decisions and will continue to adhere to this practice. ADOPTION OF ALTERNATIVE ASSESSME~T ?ROCEDURES AND !NSTRUCT:ONAL PRACTICES S~ECI~ICALLY DESIGNED AVOIJ OVERREPRES2NTATION Cf MINORI~Y S7UDE~TS IN E.1R l?ROGR.!J1S In addition to ~aintaining its comp~iance Hi:h all State and fede~al regulations governing special education, particularly those provisions designed as saE~guards against the misclassification of individuals as being mentally retarded, the North Little Rock School District will engage in an on-going effort to identify and study new assessment and evaluation techniques which are designed to 3ddress the problem of overrepresentation of minority children in EMR programs. -6- 00122 ---~ The System of Multipluralistic Assessment (SOMPA) is a recently developed test Ear intellectual ability specifically designed to eliminate the cultural or socioeconomic bias octen associated with other tests oE intellectual ability. The District does not currently use this test because it is not one of those tests presently approved by the Arkansas Depart~ent oE Education for measuring intellectual ability. See \"Program Standards\" at 13-2 to 13-3 (1985). The NLRSD has Eor~ally requested that the Department oE Education approve the use of SOMPA as a test oE intellectual ability in performing ~ental retardation assessments and evaluations. As soon as the State grants its approval, the District will use SOMPA when appropriate in assesstng ~inority students. ---C~NTALICCAN STUDY [n 1984 the Cantalician foundation, ~~blished a booklet entitled \"Technical Assistance on Alterna~i?e ?~ictices ~etated to the ?roblem oE the Overrepresentation oc Blac~ and Other Minority Students in Classes Ear the Educably ~entally Retarded\" (Cantalician foundation, rnc.: 19d4). (.l.ddendum 3f\nhereinaEter referred to as \"Cantalician Study ac \"). This publication ,,.as commissioned by the Ot:Eice or Ci.vil Rights, United States Department of Education in an eEEort to provide technical assistance to state and local educational agencies in the reduction oE the overrepresentation oE minority students in EMR programs. -7- 00123 As a result of its study, the Cantalician Foundation identified six alternative instructional practices, two alternative referral practices and two alternative assess~ent practices which appeared to be effecti'le in reducing minority placement in E~R classes. The alter~ative instructional practices were endorsed by the Foundation because, ic implemented successfully, they would enable some students at risk of EMR placement to improve their performance to the extent that referral for special services would not be necessary. The six practices identified were: 1. Direct rnstruction with DISTAR (Cantalician Study at 10) 2. Exemplary Center for Reading rnstruction (rd. at 13) 3. ?::ecis:.an Teaching ( :d. 3': L5) 4. ?eer Tutoring (rd. at 20) .:..-.:!apti,e Learning En1i::on::-.en:. :-!odeL ([j. a: 23) 5. (:)mpui:er Assisted [ns':r.ic':ion (:i. at 2 :j) l The No:::h Little Rock School Distr~=: ~as ~~plemented or is in the process of implementing all six Jf these alternati'le instructional practices. The Cantalician Foundation also rec:mrr.ended :our alternative recer::al and assess~ent practices: 1A detailed description of these practices is contained in the Cantalician Study attached heret:) as Addendum 3F and will not be repeated here. -8- 00124 1. Pupil Appraisal Assess~ent Program (1.. at 30) 2. Rapid Exam Eoc Early Referral and Classroom Learning Screening (Id. at 35) 3. Reclassification and Declassification (Id. at 40) 4. Interactive Model Eoc PcoEessional Action and Change Eoc Teac~ecs (Id. at 4 6) . The alternative cefeccal and assessment practices listed above will ce closely studied by the NLRSD. rf ':here ace critical at:ributes within the above referenced practices that ace not cuc:ently in use in the North Little Rock School District and :he addit:on of these attributes will lower cefeccal and ~lacement rates in the District without compromising educational quality, these 3ttributes will be added cc used to ce~lace current practices. ---OTHER AL~EiNA![VE PRACTICES endorsed by :he Cantalician foundation, the ~LRSD has also implemented a Chapter I Project Eoc Elemen~ary Sc~ooLs designed to identify children in grades K - 2 who lack the basic learning skills necessary Eor successcul per~orrnance in the regular classroom. Teacher aides are assigned to the regular classroom specifically for the purpose of working with the students in this program and provide these students with intensive, individualized instruction designed to develop the learning skills needed. When successful this program avoids -9- 00125 the need to place a student in a special education program and permits advancement through the normal curriculum. A more detailed description of this program is contained in Addendum JG, entitled MNorth Little Rock Public Schools: A Cha9ter r Project for Elementary Schools. ---rNCREASED REVIEW SY I~DEPENDENT PARTIES State regulations provide that the Departxent oE Education will conduct a review oE each school district's special education program at least once every three years to determine compliance with all State and federal regulations. The North Little Rock School District's last compliance review was completed on April 18, 1984 and the District was found to be in compliance. See NLRX 30 ~Monitoring Checklist and Compliance Letter attached as Addendum 3H. All 3u~1ested improvements were i~plemented by January 31, 1985. See Let~er t0 Ark. Dept. oE Education jated L/31/85 attached as Addendu~ JI. In addition to this regularly scheduled c=~pliance rev:ew, the District will invite the following organizations ta conduct in-service training and/or periodic review oE ~he District'3 policies, practices and procedures related to 3pecific education. 1. Child Advocacy Services, Inc. 2. Bureau of the Educationally Handicapped 3. Parents' Coalition for the Handicapped 4. federal Office of Special Education -10- 00126 5. Arkansas Department oE Education 6. OEEice oE Civil Rights, U.S. Depart~ent oE Education As a Eurther eEEort to open the Distric=s assessment process to outside review and constructi~e criticism, child advocates will be invited to attend conferences where children's needs are being discussed, subject to ~arental approval where necessary. The Superintendent of the North Little Rock School Dist:ict will also appoint a committee whose ~embers will include, but will not be limited to, parents, patrons, scudents, teachers, licensed examiners, counselors, princi?als, speech therapists and special education administrators which committ:e will be charged with r:viewing student records a~d special education procedures and whose me~bers will be asked :0 attend student conEerences. Additionally, this cJmmi:::e ~ill ~e 3sked to ~onitor all phases 0f =he Districc's 3~ecial educacio~ ?roqcam 3nd its compliance with State and cederal reguLatiJns a: lease every 18 months. -11- 00121 REFERRAL PLACEMENT \u0026amp; APPEAL PROCEDURES: FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION Mct/:JJ.t t AND RELATED SERVICES ARKANSAS DEPARTMENTO F EDUCATION ----- TOMMY R. VENTERS DIRECTOR GENERAL EDUCATION 198S 00128 ( ~.\n_ ~:c:~~~~, ~~=~c~c~ ?-8~ec: f_~cs .::.:vi..:es _,c=~ ':CL1.:. . 17:Ci-1 -'F P.~RT 3, Fu~l~c ~2~ ?4.~~2 -- ...,. - ' !.\n-=- 00129 TABLE OF CONTENT~ PART I. CHILD LOCATICN ANO qffERRAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .        l PART II. EVALUATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .          3 PART III. PROGRAMMING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  . .         9 PART IV. INDIVIDUAL PROTE::TIONSA NO PROCEDURASL AFEGUARDS.. ....... 12 A. PRICR NOTICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  .       12 8. INOE.~Et~OEN2T/A LUATIONS .................................. 13 C. CCNF!OENTIALITY .......................................... 14 0. CONSENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .               16 E. ENFORCE~NT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  . .              17 F. NONO!SCRIMI~ATCRYT ESTII-G ...................... 17 G. LEAST RESiRICT:VE SETTING ................................... 17 H. SURRCGTAE PARENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  .  .      .  18 I . HEARINGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  .              24 PART V. FORMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  . .            36 A. SA1\"PLE FORMS FCR LOCATION, IOENT!rICATICN, ANO E1/ALUAT:ON . 37 8. SAMPLEF QRMSF GR PROGRAMMING... .................. 63 C. SA1\"PLEF ORMSF CR SURROGATEP ARE~TS .............  69 0. SAM'LE FORMS FOR HEARINGS ................................... 76 \\ 00130  S'E:'.NING CHILD FI1'0 AWARENESS C~PAIGNS FLOWC !-lAAT FOR PLACEriENTF ROCEOLRES SL'RVEYS Oir,ER AGENCY RE=cRTS ~GE:'liS, TEAC:-8S, OTl-8S AUTC~ATIC AI\\NUAL REVi:E'i'I .=i:RST PARENT 'lOTIFiCA ION ( 60) ,, (30) ::'/.OLuAT :CN/ROGRM-1MIN G :SNFBENCE I ::\u0026gt;QRENCTC 1'6ENT I / / I ~ ( 7) C(60T i~FCR~RY SETT~NG J ::::.oRENT'IO TIF ICAT ICN OF :'.'ltll 1JA TION 'JUTCCMEA W OEC:!S:C N 7 ?~RENT NOTIFIC.~i:GN lJF CUTc:J~E r----------1 :::i.aRENTC '.:NSENT :.JRJN rRE-EVALUATION TO BE 1- - I CONSIO ERED AN1'1UALYL- I RECUIREEDV ERYT HIRD L - - YEAR - - - - - J (15) ~NNUAL REVIEW INITIAL =t.ACE~ENT :\u0026gt;ARENTN OTIFICATION OF CONFERENCE ?ARENT, TI ICATION F !lNNUAL REVIE'i'I DEC IS ION (~ERS H-OICATE MAXIMl.MN t.J,48E~O F CAL::NJAA QAYS CN 'ol/H!Q-i EVENTS SHJULO OCM.) 00131 t r I r 9CIAL ~01...CAfICAlN-0 RE'...AfExJ. ~VICES I NrRCOLHCO N 7hese :e\nulaticns are ::-e ::rccecures :a 1:rolement ::-e\nJol!.:!.es ::\u0026gt;f :~e State \".an for Soec!.al ~::t.cat!.:n, orovislcns of .let :02 of 1973, as ~encea, 3/'lC \"l.:::!.c Law ?u-:.:.2. :acn :ocal ecucation agency 3f'C eacn ::.ubllc agercy ::\u0026gt;rovic!.ng eo.\ncat!.cr.al servi:es ror arc!.:accea st:.\ncents snall acopt ano !.:nole~ent ~~e ~ollc!.es out:lnea tn tnis :ccunent. The .:cci_i-:'len:t: =nsists ct' f.i,e\nar:s. :lar:s ! , ire ::: c1..:::::\"'e ::cc~OJr~s :'er ~oc3t!.rg, refer:!.~g, evaluat!.r.g, ano c::igramming 'or s:-cents .no :ece: ,e scec!.a ecucat!.::n lnO :elateo services. ?art rv is a statement cf\nJol!.cies and ::::ecu:es or :::visicn Jf !.nolvicual protec:!.~ns ano :::-ccecural safe~uaros as :ecui:eo :y ?._. ,i.-~.:.2 ano ~c-,\u0026lt;ar.sas Act lC2, as Amer.Ceo. ?art 1 c::ntai,,s samole fo:\nns 31'10 :et:e:s ro: ~se !.n ::-e :::-ocess\nf :erer:al, evaluat!.cn, placemer-t, ano ci::-:iivs icn of scecial ecucat!.::n ano :elate() se:, !.:es.\niefererce snoulo ':le 'l\\3Ce to these ror:ns as tne nar:at:.,e 'er ?arts ! :nr:iugn :v !.s :eao. Efror:3 :o \"\"'ina :~1!::-en -,re .,av ~e eli:\ni::e C'cr 3e:,~:?s ..r.. c?: Stai:e ino =-~cer31 :aw c::nsisc Jt' tNO elements: c.,1:j ~!.no anc :erer:al. r,-, :!.sc~ar\n:.-g ~=3 =~s~:nsiJi:~::, :: ~,,si..:? :.--.ac --3r,c~:Jc:?~ :.-:!.:.::~n t\"':O 1:! :e~al :esicents :f ::---e .::!.st:!.c-: 3re :::v:.:e~ ..,!,:,\"'\\ 3 :-:~e 3cc:-:~::3:e :_::!.: ~Cl..C3t~Jn, ::-e :.:c31 sc:-iool :l!.s::!.:: m.\ns: nake eve!:\"/ '!~r~rt :o ~.:c3te 1r.c _:e~t!. ::, i.:: :~:::::?!\"I .no 11ay :\ne\nar.c!.:3ccea. 7hi\n~f'Jr: .-11! ~nc!.~ce 3:: :~!.!..:::e,, 3e:,ea ~nc\nrs~:,ea. ~s a .1a:4: or :-1:j ::cJt!=n, :!s::!.=t:s :i- 0 '!!\"'C:w:1c\n!: :~ ?s:ao_:s:i =~1...:!.ne sc:eening ::,ro:::!O..\n:es :n ==~~~ :: ~...:er't:1f, =~~~::'!!\"'\\ i::i :~,s:.:J:. :e-\n.:::31, :1rc ?~ ... c1:~,\nna: :::::.:.~s  nic\"'I l\\8y !.i:te:.:!:e ..: t, -:.-ie:.: :Jcac:.::.::, -.: 1c:-:.-!v:.--\n:_::~s3 :.n :c:-.:o:. - ..e. sc:e~n!.:ig :~sul~~ -nay !.t~c!.:a:e :O\"\"e- eeo ..: : :?.:~::3l. ::: ~ .::.-~: !4:_ .a:::Jr\". =--:::-::ai: 1r:a/:: !.:if::,al ~::-?en:r.g !.3 Sl.i~\nest?C .. :::en !r,~:1 ~\n1 \u0026lt;:-::~:\nJ::?,.. 1~:. :: .t'::s~\n:1ce ir= ~Jr ::1::.:::en ::ansf!::!ng ttito ':... e. :!s::!::~. ilfi':.\n:n i:.--:e ~:,3::::::'\u0026gt; ::.: ..... =-=~::-e ic:ee'\"\"~:-c\n, is 1cvi3acle :.J !....,c!.:.Jc:ae ~!.:c!.: sc:?~!..-c\n-\"\"::1...:\nr,:ut :-e ic.-::: :a:?~:. :c:eer.~,-c\n~.:-\n::esc:-:col ~!.:::!,, :if'ld ~:it'ar.~s ~==~a r-:1 :e-:~:.:.:ri :.- .,acic!.:J:::.-\n:::- :!. ::=ns 3i':C'J:: :e 3 :3:: Jf :~e ~~::: := ::cace -anc!~ap~?a r.:!::~n. ~~r~ntJl :e~:ss!.:~ :s ~a: :!~ui:ec ~J: sc:e2~:-~ ~~ :~-? :::? !n:~g ~~~J:: :3 :::ec:?,: :: .. a:: 1 5et\n...,er: :f :~e iC:\"'OOl -\nc:~:a:::::m, !..~., ::--e ?1\"'1:!.:? \u0026lt;!.-,\ne:\n3::en lS\n:::sec :o :re ::\"\"!::~ :.n \u0026lt;i.:ce:\nJr:an. :nly \"'t\"'er :ne en!.:.:: :,3 5_:r\n:ec :1...t 3r:c :~s:~ i:e =c:'ll,,!.s:::ec :o :~a:: .::-:.:a 1l~~e i:: :arental :e:~!\n3~~n oe :equi:ed. \"' :l.O:~.:\n.a:eness .:amoai\nn -::use :a urcer:J,\u0026lt;en - ':,(~:., --~ -~,nt..ni , 1ccuc .::-e =~:nt :\ni Jrio --.r.e 1vai:ao i:i. :y of ~cucat!.orial serv tees or ,\n~ai~a\n:e-: .:\n:,':,\n:e,, ..... 3c:--.:ois 5i1c1...lC~ a:~c.a:n ::-:c:::3 .Jr\" i:: .1.. a:eriess 1c:i,ities . .:.~: :ei~v~nc :ecor=s :n ::ii!.c:en :ecei,i~r\ncec!.31 3e:,::es .. :!.: :e :-e,t.?\"'eo 1f\"'lnuai:/ :o ~:c3c? ~nose :rn:c:en ,i,no :1r':! :naoor ~cr:.J::~l/ inc,~r :..-aceCt...3Cei/\ne:,'!C :, vt::L..t! Jr\" :.--eir ,:~sent :J:acement. :::cce:atlon anc ::or:!.rat!.cn -,1,\n::--: ::::--er :=r.mun~:y ac\nenc:es, 5e:-,:.:e J:~3r::at!.:ns, t1a:ents. 1nd icne: :~aiv::~als !~cu:a :1~e :!aca :J 1s3!st jisc::=:i:e =c:?erii~g 3f\"ldl ocat!.on ef\"J:'::. ~efer '::J ::\"\".e: ...:.: .: =-t:\"\\C.. .,\nr,_al acr .jcc:.::.~na! t:ifo::-nac!.:n. \u0026gt;ef~::Jl ls -,\nice .,r :r~ :u,: ~se :f ::mo:.1r:\n'.rih::iac!.:c, J:cuc 1 :,!.::l ~oer.enci:-c\n.Jr:o:~.,,s ..,nicn :ncerf:?r'? -,1::1 :e3r-i:rig. InitioL :er~r:-al Si'OulC :e 4'aCe .ren ,1 .:nilo Ls -?r.Ccl.!nte::.rg 1if'!.cui.:~es 'n ,ia-\u0026lt;'c,c\n---~-ss ,,.,  ,. ocul1r ~CL.~Jc'~-3 ---c\n-3111 cme ~ypical ::ienav~Jrs\nuc\n~estlv~ of Ji::::-::~anyi.~\n.., c~~~o::ii g ~-=r.oi:!.c~~-H\n-\ne~ .:o-r:., ~n ?7ogr:?m '.3tariaar::s and oi!.:::iili:v -:ri:er:3 ~or 5oe:!.at .::::uCJtl~n, :ne .:::moani\nn ouoli::Jt!.cn \"..O\" ..!'11sc oc:.inenc. A -:enavLor r:nec\n.:Est er sc:e~nir\n~.,,entc:1 aay :::e ,\n~ea :o ::-:i.:Jt! ::-e \"eeo for referral. 00132 -1- QJ u \",.' ,. ::m r ',,\". . .~. . \" II . ,' ' ., Q,J ,\nu ::, u M QJ lJ' ll .\".' !l u C. V u L \"\u0026gt; ' _QJ, 0.1 . .r,. .....  _VI, n, ::, .,~.. .. , 0 C. .. OJ !\nn ... ., c, E . .,....._ , u'\" \u0026gt;- c.. ..C\" ' \"'u (l \"' 0--t\u0026amp;-.\u0026gt;,QJ .UfTlOJDC. ... J. ' ~~\n~~o o ':\n-,_ ,n.\n? . --' .o: ,  m fi ~ t: 1! - t\n~ ft I .I Vl ~ 1 GI~ C -~ :JO ! 1n ~ ,g j ~ ~ 1)~.\n~t:~ . t u ... 01 V1 -4 v, C O ,._ QJ r ru .....,.._ a, ~ ,.V1 Ct-, CO ,.... r4 --t JGJ IJ 8 C ~ g{, ,,\nC L U E OJ - u ffl...-4 f\nc~ ~m ~ a) g ~ ~ l'l 1t: u o a -4 c~~E~-0  ::i 5 M ~ :.! _. f! o .~ ~G gg~-i'\"~ C. O n:, S.t f~ (J I' QJ '-' n -~ i ~Er. r C ~ O.~ 1.J\"\"t~rr.s~ ,._ E J...1 \u0026lt;V ct.- O ~ M, 5 go -4 IL --t  \"' \u0026gt;-v,-t u 04.luQJO._. ..-t-fc.u~'-- S.. . ~ ~!: f, ~ ~ \"'~,,, c: a J..t o '-' cu3fuij~ 5--..b~g.w \"' C LI ct.- 0 --t .. c\"'o .., e~ ~ \u0026amp;-. ., ~-~ ~ ~t? ~ ~ ... u (.JI _f:n:, .~ M n--t C l.l -~ i.f-? E ~ ~ U --t'\"t~.s~~ ('(J '- \u0026amp;J f) \" m u ~\na\n~~ g' ~ 'a, ~ 5 hl -~ g ... CJ'ttJ 1--, 1lJ --4 '-- OJ .u cVlul! .... c QJ GJ V1 C CU ,__. tJ 'O QJ LI  La .IJ :,0 QJ\n.! -~MM ~ g-it: r 1 0 J t/'I Vl C \u0026amp;-.  ., E U O Y QJ '11 :, - M..., rlVl\u0026gt;Off1QJ D nJ~.-IV1 ll C a... O :\nF ~ ~  ~ CP ~ e .L! u r, -~ 8\n ~ 1n C 11 ti I , , _, ,n c ..  ~: :': :~ QI r ~  I t-, I (. ~ Cl Qt CI 1 ' Vt,._ C QJ It.- 01 n l) fl' 0 0 U  I ... t C i.J  t QJ Vt QI n, f\n~ D 1 : ~: fu QJ I I J g I~ ~ !\n[\n~ ~ (f~ :, ''- -: H _, C tl U t, ttl f1.J uCJ'laj'aC., C l\u0026gt; '' a..,L\u0026gt;On,IV :, f) L C ~-- =\" U,. t .... 10 QJ t n,ft1 n-l.TI r g-\nQ)a, GJ ~ -4 LJ L 0 :i g f, r: ~, g -1 01 0 n c,, u ,, -4 JJ c.c.:.\u0026lt;Jro ... ,-f  I 111 (. M r'1 C o fJ 11 -f OJ QJ  t  t I 1 E,,fj~\n::\n.~, OJ U 01 wao,Ju1, QJ .-4 u u \"' U :, ::\u0026gt; OJ 1.1 QJ r:cu0 - ...- ot.,, r.  4 VI .s\nP\n: U ~~,._Jn5 \ng~~QJ~ ~:::VI .. \"o u~ .n.. .:-\n~~ s '\"~.!::rt\u0026gt; 0 C ''\": ~ ~ ._. :! C1 .!t C ~ -~  -~t OJ .!:: ~ !J g-~ J) l :.! -~ j !J -~ C n n -~ ~ 6 -~ V'I .!, ~ m ~ u - \u0026amp;J ~c5\n~~ -~ .!:!\n_~: ~ ~ ~'ii::.: i .~ - M X I.-~ V1 oun \u0026gt;-U'._ OJ''- OJ CL CC r f. r'{ \"'  , u.' , , .. v, i., QJ QJ O F \u0026gt;- ... u C u - 01 F U OJ I.I ,--4 ..... -f U' V't ~ ~\n! ~ f ~ fu\n. ~:G ~ n (11 CC F'\" ,- .._,  I I fO O .C QJ p_, 0 ~ ~u u, ~ cuu ~ t n, J.J (\" 0 fTl l.1 fi .-4 (l ' 1, .. , a., ft\u0026gt; r m 111 C) I I C' () VI ':I t.J It I ,!1_~' :1 ~.-:\nr i~ -~~ i! ~: ~: / 1 QJ ,,t ( 01 ll  (.ti 'L. u tr' lf'l(i 1, I n:J 01 01 111 11 HJ fl U t,  1 I+ iJ .-t (. OJ (l C.l U 1n 10 l.1 n C. 1, 1._ m E Cl .,1 C ._, .. \" fl 1.1 fl VI ... , ,, o n, c. ,, c umV'lv1c .:, u,,.n -~ I .~{ ? ~ I.J ~ f,~ ~ tJ U ~ :\n'.6\n. C 7 :~ ::\nui '.J r .! , !~ ~ .! :.~ r. ~\n.\n:\np n (11 JaJ ,7. !\n! I I L,  I_. ti ~! 1 I ~, ~\n~ ,_, 0 r: .~: t : 1 .. fi .~{!\nM:\n.~J\n.\n: .:, ,,O J .-t It t/1 IJ. , 1 L, J.J I. r!rl'cGJ~~~n,~..,.J ~: m f? ,\nj V1 -~: V 1 \u0026lt;: .f 1'- U O Cl.  01 v, .. n, n c ..... , u ,  u a, a., ,J ,,, ._., \"' a, LUQJ -tPffl .1,c_ QJ ~ fi ~ C r! \n~- ~~ ! :\nn l. ,, .. 401,0 1'-ftJl1 ~ g .~ ~ ,,,, ,-:J r ~: :JJ ~ f'1 f\n-~ ?~ ~! I I f\n: tr) ~I (I), I -~ M .. ,  ~ t' J~ ,~ t ~ :1 ~ ~: C\n~ ,,.f r: .1J IIJ IJ 'ri -~ ...... OJ OJ ~ CJ\\ Lt I.J U ' Mc f....:-~n .~:. ~ r! ~-~ I I Q ... 4 VI OJ O {11\n~ C 0 I J -f - o, M JI ...._ - (lJ f '-- :JLJ.._.-,nJu E r} -~ hl a\nl :~ ~!' ~,\n.~ J n f I L M ,1J C Lt s.., .._.. O V1 1.1 U n, tV U ~ \u0026gt;.OJVlfl. QJVlns.., It ~~c.,~f\n5.._.0~:~ ....n : ._. I'\n'i oi \nJ, f' .. !..:~ ~ \"' . ~ -~ -~ :: \n._~\n~ t~ rn 3 -~ r G, }? fY ~ ' -~r o tt_ E ' m OJ o .. n M r....._.,,  ou .. 1 u OJ o u .GJ V1 u a, a, ~ lJ. ~ t t N g\n:_.~' .~: - .,.., Cl.I .... L, u ..\nj ... , _, ,-... - C C  ' QJ ,.,  t C ~ \"' f? ~ ~\n1 .\n!\n~\n~ t ~ ~ ~~ 5 u .s ' ...u V1 ~ \u0026gt;QJ u -._-tepu (l) Ul O OI OJ _I O o C flJ V'I '-'cu CU a: U-tP t.._..u~~ -~\"':J~hl .s 5'~ ~ ~ ~ (l_ 'cg r :,~ -\nr. -t ,-f u -~ r. .. I  ' l1' lfl .I' V1 :. 0 C. Ill Lf V1 - --t ( I ,_. OJ  I C O V1 .~ ftJ N n L a, ~ , J m ,n , J m \": J ..... , n \u0026lt;J .. Uv,(l) CI V, L ::,,. C 'l:1 L I \u0026gt; l) fT) ,., _, ::--. ftJ t.J ll I OJ ta I 1 flf\\J 't -~ Ill t.., LI (. u:u O J ~(' ~.. ~\n .~~ !, ~I t.:. .\"\nI I I I ,.fl\n~: ' 1 Ill'- 1n ~ I 111 flt 11 fl r .. (U,. f\"= t\u0026lt;t ,n :~ I 2 QI~, ~ f' I t' (., 0' ( C l( n, 0' I' Ui 1, O IU 1, 'J ~ ~ f ) : I O, ~ I I ~ \"' \"' \n: : \"' 1 -' I ,, 1 I i,t 11 ,,, 'ffl f')\nr -,,_: (. :\n~: ,, f ..... ,, .,., .:. : f, f: r ~J '1~ j r ~~: : I j l ll C  ~ u C7'  n.  u o., n' ,_1 (I I ffl If' '\"J ., I u 4 r v ,J ( ~ It (II Ml f I 111 (. ~I 1?~.\n1: 1 ' I .'.!' ~ ~I :~ ._ iJ ~ I) t, ., I I Vl  J ~  o u n.., ~ .~i 'L .! I : : ~ : ,, ,, ,,, .,., ~ 111 l f 1 V1 '1 I 1 .~: , '  I t ~: :~ Vl ,,\n!'! :!. .,_ f\n?~ t:-4 ~\n:1? ,, '' ,:, I I :r:~~ \n! 1J ~ H r) II (1 I: JI I ' r QJ ~ \n,~ .~ ~ (1 ~ ~ ! i J' ~~ '\ngJ 0(1 .. _,. In ~1~~ : tlJ r .. I 11 f, ~: : J f'1 .~: f1 o\n,\n':'~ !E ~ _fi :. I .~ ! '(.: f-1.: ! ~:- ~,: ~ 1.J 1J I \u0026gt; 11 0 (l tlJ I~ l'l l. 111 f\n~-,~ VI ~ r\n~: . ._ t'.J ,, ..... ~ IU ,, -1 c, r., CC :o-~~ t OJ l.f C .:~ ~ n. ... C u ro O t1 -, OJ ~ .'.l i~ ~ ~ :a g 1~ g ~ Cl)-~ ~ ?nu tJ u .~ 5 ,, ~ J -~ -~~~~E---~~fi 0 LJ(J---4UL, .L O 1,1 IO,,,,,..... fl'\" C - .~fl fl Cl ., u .'.O, ,, ,.C .,. .m ' ..I.., . , ., 1\" ,, m ! di '\" C: Li  C OJ '11 r, u - ,..... , Cl (IJ OJ l' u ... I ' I C fT1 , I ~ t ,  I ( J  I l () OJ 1 (1\n,' .~: ~ }: ~~ ?! I,._ ~ I 111   ll '\" lJ \"' I I ,., {I ~~ .~ I I f: d ~- ~:tl u \"' \"' '' Qt 'd 1 ' l I '1' t ,  ._, l fJ' (. t.1 I 11, 1f' f'. fl , .. n ,, ,, \"' ,, ,,  I I I i I I -4 'll - .. ~: !.! i: ~ ~ .:\n:. IJ ~: !~ ~:  111 ,!II  : : ~? ( ~J ,'.: ,, I ~ f\n, t.. Qt , , ,\n\u0026gt; ,\n-u :- V\\ _c ! C  I f' C' I ..) 11' I '\\.'  I ~J :,: ~-~ o 1 , .,. t ? ~\n~:\nJ~ I : Ii t, (: ,.:\n,: ~ 1\n.' : 11\u0026gt;  I r 1 !~  '' I.,, 11 ( f  M 'I.' I' ' I '' , 111 I. I Al -'\n\n.\n1.. , '! . :?.::: .'. ,' 'J ~I -~J 'f 1 0 :,~~~ f ~ C ~ .!, ~: (II tt ~' \"~ ?' ~ \"1 3  :~ ~ !j f. ~: t ~\n'\n' ~?  -! , .. 0 ..... ,, ,-1 ': ,\nt ,.. -~ l. !'. r ' c. (1 f\n~ ,\n ~ .~1t ~!  I IJ  I f I IJ I I O QI I I .~ ::r :~ :~ I ,,,\n ~ ::: H r C 5 ,II 11 ,\"I 1 I) I f!I 'l', 1 ftl I Lt I - '' 1 ,11 a, t ft t. ,1 . Ill () , I VI I, -C ~ tJJ I . , 1 1J....... t1J A1 y I Q.1  L ,,. '11 ClJ C. -\n1J :\n~ I .~: ~\n~  l f:: ']~ L' o, n, : , a u '\" QJ ,., '' u I ' II I.J ~ C : :: fl) ~ I J , 1 ~I .~ r l/1 t  II 1/) 1/l  .,. 1- t., ') r ~ '\" _d: , , I .' ! c,.,~ ' r -~ t.I L l '11 .! i \"' U V) L J - I r)I llJ r f. ..f -I ._ OJ 'J Q \"I 'II I I ', C 'J , , LJ ,., 01 '1 OJ l\"I '-' - 0 0 C. c,' 1.1 r,L \u0026lt;. 11 C , .. OJ '\\.I~ l L1Jt1t1'r,,JflJ.:t\u0026gt;r.) 01 'II '1J l/1 -....  I 10 I I  J ..... ~:~ ,~ : ~:r i .~:~ :! ~ r: P'. ...~. g : 0 ,.., (L -t ~! ll 1~ ,!! :\n, ') ,., ,~ ,, . \n:.~ ~~ l~.!, Pl .., ~ ~ ... ~ r  ... ~ :i: s cJ .- , c :o :.. r. f! ~l 11 :: ~. \n r! r .~! n F. ~\n,,111f.1, 0UflJ()lflJ1tl1J ftl f'II t Qt ~ (IJ (\\ f -I t.l l..t (. ~) ,\n, t 1. Ii ~ 1 fl I\n(U '.: ~:  t '-  1 If I~\" ClJ C:  I I IJ I I.  (.) f 1 a_{,,, h -~i 111 P. ~OJ'\" ~ 1 ~\n! _, 1,._ lf II  1 I~ (tJ ~ i I 1 ~\n~ I 01 r I 'lJ 4J {.' 'J rJ Ll I ..... n f! : r fl ! j :..: -~\n\"- co L..J 0 ,., '\\\n~ ,: it: ..... \n{, L.J ,-. f? OJ U -  ., f P'. ~'!) :. ~ OJ t: (II ~ ~, i .. I .'~ -1 ~ ~ (. ~ g l-:,.._1-~~~Mlc 1 ~ t f- ,: -~ t cu .-. OJ n ~ !1' (l. (lJ ~  tJ \u0026gt; {) {~  I (: 1, .~ tl .. t F ~' - :1  r-, f  rtJ , GJ 1 C: l t I U L, \u0026gt;, ~J W\nJ ( f.l,t 11  C. 1J ft' t1 (l Ct' i_. ,. '\" I It ,,  fl   ., ... , (1 o ,., n w C' a., o. ,  L 11.l n O C .. , t, ,, ll! .... :- ,., 1':' n, ~:. , o '\"J' u IJ' ~ ... rl .~, VI 1 I. .. , \u0026lt; ,, C : ~1 f ~ :. / ':i~ :': !! : :.\n.. L t: ~ J. ,._,..., !-: ,., :_I,.!'} ,_ '1 r r Vt  .': t, n !,~ 'J'  I .... 't' l,J , i=.:. [' ,.\\ ti.' ., ~ ~ ~: [= fs ,  , J j:_. 1J L, r 'l a, ,. .. -~  ~ u1i..C1i1,C ~~ '\\.I ,3 ,,. 0 !3 'l-1 -1--tVI ~~. ~ ~-\n~ I: ,\nI I .',~ I J ~ ~ fJ ~~ -. ~ QI ,,'!I 1., e .~\nu u I\\.' L. ::\u0026gt; fTJ L, C ._., (\\. U -o ,1 \" 'lJ IJ 01 v, ,,,--t .,.f OJ. I .~ ~~ . ~- -~, \"l w ~ ~ F 1n C ._, .. , t/l v, '-' t 11 u u a, \u0026gt;--' c: L OJ o c.: o 1i U' I: , .. 10 OJ , ... ... ,., .,, 0 'J '\"' 1 \"' E n \"'Ill CJ (IJ , , o, L..J u u CJ ~ ~ 53 ~ fl 5 J: 01 ,, \"' ,  1., \u0026lt;r ,--, '1J QJ 'IJ ().-  '- \u0026gt; .,..... . _ :, C n.J nLi._uO,.t f)  I L'. , I -I Cl'' Ut - ~ r' \n.\n... , !'! ,\nI, I E\" I a., LJ _'J ,. '1J (J '1J ._ '11 C ,,._ C .:O\\. .., [~ ~ ,y o,... m a, 'J  ._ (lJ () ~ ':' I.' .-, I ~ J'?: ~ ~ t -, u - ........ r+ f\n- ,.., C' LJ --th n VI ,,, w a u -' ..._. C Y. 'U . .., C. 'l) '\\) -4'1.- (I) (II VI 0. 1 a., 1..., QI OE u OJ ,n 1, C '\"J C r 0 Cl -, l ~- I' \"' QJ E Cl l:! -5 .., t: 0) ~ QJ 0- 'T) C -  OJ o ro r~ ... , C ,J V1 (.l \\!'~ ~ fl ..O...J. , Ol r1 ,j_ Lt l C t. n L' a 1- 1 , 1. OJ ,?:' .t\", I !=, C. , . .~! a, ,,, __. a _, C1 LU I.'. ..f.J. . QJ, t11 UI '1. 01 1,  .., OJ IY U, !} .,. ..... r. u ~~g '.:,l --\u0026lt; c,, U\"' C L, fl 0 .. f t... u u :J 01 L Ul ,,,_ .. C: '-' OJ .., ..n ,. ,., ., 0 ., s  P-\u0026gt;- ..... o.i .r ..u. . tt ~' :! ~ V fl 5 0-~ CI .f C ., \"'u n . !.~ g :a i n:, ,  ..., O' C .s O OJ f jEf1!! ,, o a h .. a, E OJ E - ~ .~! '~ V1 \"~: f'I o V C n O g 0 LJ OJ .... 0 ... 111 .LI (U .. , o,._ ~~~~ TJ -t 10 'J __.E.,-1 ~~ ~ ~ i: F. IJ ~ ........ ,._ 11.' n Ill(!) f'C IL .. ' t: I N ' \u0026lt;') \u0026lt;') .-1 0 0 Oct.!.cns for :ne qerer:al Conference i:.ec!s1on include: l. evaluat.!.on (Ein:: iua:act:ioorno)a nce 1th =,o ram Standarcs 3nd E.: .!. !bU!tv :::teria 'or Sce:!al (a) speci1lized evaluation (b) comcrehensive evaluation 2. no evaluat.!.on ( remain in :egu!ar ecucat!:in program *ith -:ir -itnout otner tyces of program modification). If tl\"le :ecisi:n is to Jt:.!.!.ze the refer:al -:iut::ome !nvolving evaluat.!.on, a temporary sett.!.ng for ::.~e st cent 11ay ::e agreed con oy oarent/gwar::.an 3r.o the clst::.!.ct. Temporary\n:ilacement is U::iited to a ce:!od of sixty (6C) ca_encar oays ::ur:..-1g hi:::, :ne evaluation '!lust t:e co110leteo. ~ temoorary setting should Jnly oe ut.!.lizeo 'or Jne of\n:ne 'oilowing reasons: (l) ooserveo e:ucaticnal neeos constitute necessity ro: 11'YT!ed1ate inte:vention anc/or (2) diagnostic data gather.!.ng is reouireo. The :eason(s) 'or ~emporary placement 11\\Jst oe stateo on a '\u0026lt;eferral C.::nference Jecision Fon,. ~n .!.nteri ~ =~sh ould be ceveloped for tne cnila, hicl'1 sets out tne scec.!.fic conoit.!.ons anc t.!.mel.!.nes 'or the temporary setting. F'rior to comcrerensi-,e Jr soec.!.alizeo evaluation, ca:ents 1\\JSt ::e fully !nformed about the ~inds or tests t  .,at ill oe seo. -\u0026lt;n !rformed Consent Statement ::'A.ist t:ien :e obtaineo from the ,::arents/guar::ian. The I:,for:neo Consent Statement 1lso :::ntains ,::er:nission to ,elease personal:y !:ent.!.fiaole .!.nfor:nat.!.on to tnlrd oart.!.es as :eter:nined oy tl'1e scnool off.!.:.!.als and acoopnrsoecnrt.e!o.a te tor or 'Jym eet.t\".!i.en go ta:rieisn tsr. eouireFm\"oern,,ts. similar to Samele Form e: and Sarrole Form ::-1 are F'arer.ts ::iust :ece!ve -r.:.t::~n ,ot..!.'.!.c:.t.!.::, Jf ::-e :ec:s:.:n :eac!\"'eO at :::-:e '\u0026lt;eferr:.l C::n'::ence. rr ::,-,e ::,arent is ,,oc Present, noti.f.!.cat :in :.s ,ace *i::i:.:i seven (7) :alencar cays after :he Referral CJnference :y (:) :egistereo -:,ail, C:2) ce::.!.r..!.eo ,11ail, ,r (3) rirst class mail. Sa110le ,or\nn 0-l is aoproo.:.ate for not.!.f .cat.!.on. ~ ,:nor.e :ontact and/or home visit sroJld be 11ace #hen t ., ere :.s any reason to :i l!eve :-,at ::-e\n:a:ents ,ay :equire assistance in understanding e~e not:.f.!.cat..!.on Jf ::.~e :., .er:al :cnferer:e Sec.!.sion. ~11\n:arent :eq1,.\nests for furt.\"ier lnfor:naticn snoul: :ece.ive 3 :es1 :nse at t:'e ~ar!..!.est\n:iossi::ile Cate. PARTU . EVAlUATI ON The purpose or evaluat.!.on is to determir.e ~\"le\n::esence or 1 -arc:.:aopi\n-g c:rd.:.t..!.on -ni:~ :esults in an eeucational Cef!c!t and the :cr:esoond.!.r.g .-:eea 'or\ncec.!.ally :esi\nr.eo ..!.r.s::-.\nc:icn. Evaluation :ata :.s :.:ilized .!.n program\n:ilanning, incli..\nOl!\"'g :.-e :eter.111.,atlcn :~ a .-:eeo 'or :elated services. :valuat.!.on\n:irocecures ,l)Jst :e :::mc!etea *ie.,.!.n\n..!.::\u0026lt;, ( SCl :aleridar\nays or :!\"e '\u0026lt;ef er.al Conference =ec.!.sion noti:\"..!.cation to ::iarents. Consent for ~v\"'--a:.!.::n uti!.!.z!ng 1n !nfcr:::ec :onsent cFo\"morp:nlse ltmedi:.a r :o Samele Fon :: 1nd ::-1\n:iust :e ()O:ai.-~ea :ef::e 31'v '::-:ial ev\"!l1\nat.!.::n\n:ir::cecures ue A. Assessment Saf~guards rn orcer to acnieve as tnorour\nn an unce:standi.-:g Jf ::-e -ee:s ::J :ne :ni:o 3s\n:ass.:.: e, :ne assessment snould .!.ncluce inf Jr.nat.!.on f:om tne sc!\"'oo:, ::-e nome, 1nd :elevant ::::rm,1,.\nni:1 vsoaruirecteys . or Its ettiisn g!sm coarntaa nt. !.ntchivati cu1a1lse.a sures of the c:ii_j's :e!\"'av:.:: 1nc/or ~e:f:ir:nance :c~e '::m 1 As reouired liy F'. L. 94-142. the roll owing c:noi t.!.ons ,use :e .net :e\nar::ing evall.a t:.on Jr a stuoent ::ir.!.or to placement in a soec..!.al educat..!.on program: (l) rests and other evaluation materials: (a) ~re proviceo and 3dministerea in the c.,i!c's native language or other moce of cotl'fflunicaticn unless it is clearly not ~easible to oo so\n(b) Have been validatea for t~e specific pur\n:,ose 'or whicn tney are used\n1nd (c) oArroev iOacemd lnbiys tetrheedi r pbryo outrcaeirn. ed personnel .!.n conformance -.!th the instruction\n\" L. 94-142, Section l2la.532 -J- 00134 areas of idueat!onal need and not merely tnose wnicr. are oesii\n-ieo to provioe a si~gle gereraJ. intelligence cuotient. (3) Tests are selected and administered so as best to 1!1'1sure t.,at hen a test is acministered to a child with ill'Oaired sensory, manu\n1l, or speaking skills, the test results accurately reflect t e child's aotitU\u0026lt;1e or acn:.eve.,ent level or whatever other factors the test purports to measure. rather than reflecting the cnilo' s i~aired sensory, manual, or speaking skills (except where those skills are the factors wtiich the test purports to measure). (4) No single procedure is used as the sole criterion for determining an appropriate ecucat:.onal program for a cnild. ( 5) The evaluation is made !Jy a :nultld!.sc!.plinary ::eam or\n:ouo of ,:\ne:scns, including at least one teacner or ot:-:er specialist with l\u0026lt;nowleoge in tr.e area of suspected oisaoillty. (6) The cnild is assesseo :.n all areas reldted to tne susoected disaci_:ty, ir~luding, ,.nere acorcpriate, heal::h, vision, hearing, social anc e!l'Ot.!.cnal status, general intel:i~ence, academic perfc::nance, ccmnunicative status, and moto: aoilities. (7) Testing and evaluation materials ano procedures used for t:-:e ~u:poses of evaluation ano placement of handicapced chilcren must ::ie selecteo and aoninistered so as not to be racially or culturally discriminatory. (8) An evaluat.:.cn of the c!iil.d, ::iased on\nirocecures nic., .,eet ':he :ecui:ements under Sect.:.:n 2la.532, is conducteo every three years or ~o:e frecuently if conditions war:ant or :f tne cnilc's oa:ent or teacher requests an eva.:uat.:.cn. a. c:more.,ensbe :'.valuat.:.on C:mconents T,e components of a co~:ehensive evaluation snculo include all ~eas~res r.ecessary for :eter::iin:ng, as\ni:ec:sely as possiole, :~e barriers to learning ::resen::eo :y ~,e hand!.caooing c::ndition. ~inimum components: 3.1. Academic ?erfon,ance rr..:.s :.ncll..des tests 3nC: measures ni:n evaluate t!\"le level Jf ac\n:e'lli: 3-\u0026lt;::l attainment ::r ecucat:cnal achievement of ~he stucent. s~cn ,ieasures shoulo resu:: :.\ni a s\n::ec:f:.:Jc:.cn cf ::ie 3:wdent's academic st:engths 3nd ea,\u0026lt;r.esses, snould indicate scec:':.: s~:.1: :e::.:.:.: 1reas, 3nd snculo\ni:ovice :.nfc:mat.:.on .:in .. nic:, ::: :ase recc1TVr.encat.!.ons. ~:: :es:'...\":\nn:,.:J :e :cne ':Jy :ert.:.f:catea sc:-:col\n::ersonnel anc/c: ot:i~r aoprocr.:.ate\nr::fess.:.::-e: ,:e:~cnne: ,:e::ificated ano/or :i:enseo ::iy :ne State or ~r-\u0026lt;ansas. !naiv icual acnievement :est3 ire :.\n-c_1..cec .:.n tnis area. 3.2. Intel!ec:wa. Sk:lls :\nitellectual aoil:.:y of tne stucen~ -nus: be measurea 'Jy 3n :_-,c:.1:.:l..a: :.:-:e:::.-\ne\"ce :est acoroori3te co :hf stuoert. Suen testing ~,ust be done oy a cer:::.:':.:a:ec ::c...:Jt:.~:-a: examiner, licensee\nsycnolcg1st, or-licensed\n::sycnol:\nical examiner. 3.3. Acaotive 3el\"avior and Soc:al ~l..rc::.::~ Aoaptive benavior :efers to tl\"e effectlveness it:i ni::\"I ::i: s:,,c .r,:\n::es .,it:i the natural and social oemanos of :,:,s or ner envi:onment. ~as~:es :.:-:c:-~e ,n :v~iuJt.:.on of the degree of tne stucent 's .:.ndecendent funct.:.oni..,c\n, :\n::.:.:. :. ::rnl..nicate, perceptual-11otor aevelopment, anc socialization and se:f'-:~e:.o ~\u0026lt;:.~:s. 3enavioral ooservation tecnniques, interviews ,.ith the stuoent ano ::t:ie:-s, 3nc ac:ioc:.ve '.:lenavior scales are employee. Data snoulo come from several sources. a .. :i Co11VT1ur,icativAeb ilities Assessment :ir Language !lbillties Cnl, The aetermination of the level of assessment (e.g. cc=unic:n:.,e a:::::.::.es o: language only) ana appropriate appraisal\niersonnel is maae oy tne ~efer:al Ccmni:tee. A ~eneral language abilities assessment may ::ie concucted by certif~e J schOol i:\nersonnel and/or other appropriate professional\niersonnel certificated and/or ::.censec \u0026gt;:Jy i\nne State of' Arkansas. If oisaoilities are suspected or inaicatea, ~\n.\n:-:ner Jssessmer.t( s) for specific dlsorders in the area of COnYnunicative aoilit~es ~st ::e .:onauc:ed by a licensed and/or certificated sceecn-language patnologist. Suen te'.\n:5 :etc!r:nine levels of fuictioning in r?gard to soeecn (fluency, voice, articulatl.:n), '..mguage, ana he~ring processes. This includes aonormal c:mprene,sion ano/or exp:ession of spcl\u0026lt;en vr -ritten language. -4- 00135 11 r I I 8.5. Soc!.al History ihe history shr.iuld 1r.c!uce existing ,ert!.r.ent Cata, sucn :1s the student's ::iecical recoros, report\nof orevious evaluat!.ons, :.-eoor:s f:om .\ntr.e:.- ::::v!.ce:.- ac\nenc!.es, the cunulative scnocl :ec::ircs, ar:O tr.e ramily infor:nat.:.:n. Contact ith sne\nJarents snould t:e mace to gain aaca on the stuoent' s cevelopment:il histcry aiid\n,cme cehavior. Such cata snould ce\natnered t:y the\n:ir:ifessional ces!.g,ated :es\n::cnsit:le :.n the i'\u0026lt;eferral Conference. 8.6. Additional Co1TOonents Additional components ::ir t:-e c:l!'Orenensive evaluat!.cn\nnou d ::e :.r.c!.uCed as cete::11ined necessary oy the :earn. 3ome acoitional :cll'pcnents 11ay je: 1. cur:ent ,eai:n stacus\n:ir:iviced :ya _icersec\n:nys!.::!.an 2. ophthalmologi:al eva!.uat!.::n 3. audiological evall1ation 4. neurological evaluation 5. psycniatric evaluation C. Soec.:.allzed :'.,aluat!.on .ifhen it has Jeen cete:\"l!.\n1ea :y ::--e ~ei:e::al -::mnit:ee :, ac :-:e _r.i::.\ne -:ef:c.:.ts of ':.~e 3::.\ncent do :io: necess!.:ate 3 :::no:er-er\"si.v~ ~v\nl~uat!.~ri, .3 3pec.:.~~.:.z~aa sses3::-:e!:!s: nould :e ::ec:..:es~e~ ana c::itai,,eo :.n :r.e a:ea :.r.c:.::J:~: :y :-e 3va:.:ao:e :efe:.-::11 :.nf::::iar::!.::n. ~ny s::ec:. ':.c or :.~a:.,:.::ua! cc:r.pcnenr:: Jf :~e ::,::er-eris:.,e e,a::.:at.:.:r cay ::e exc:3c:eo 35 a s\n:e::.alized evaluation. a. '::-'!e ::--:i~j s ::ec\nu:ar teacrt!!r, or if ':.:-e ::ii!: Cces ,at \"\"lave a :egular :eacr!::. 2 =~~:..\n.\n.3::2 .2ss::::cm ~.?ac~e: ~~a .. :f:.ec :::J :aac.., .3 =~ila .Jf nis or l\":er ac\ne\n:,. 3t :eas: ::-:e\n:e:s:n ~:.:al: '!.e,j -~ ::::nct..c~ inc::,i:i.:al aiac\nnost.:.: ~:\u0026lt;a.1'li.:iat:~rs :f ::i.:.:.:::en, s:_c:, 1s an ~!:l..cac~:~al axa:nir~e:-,\n::sycno~:gi:::al axam!~e:, ~s1c~:::Jgist, ~tc.\n2. T\nie ::eam -nay ceter::iire ::-:at a ,:n:.:o \"las a s\n::e:~f.:.: :ea::ii:-:c\n:!.saoility if: a. t:ie c:-,ild -:c~s iO~ ac:iieve .:crr:nen.s.. :.3 t? .,:~:i i!S :1r r.er age ana 3oi:::1 :evels Ln c:-:e Jr .11ore of tne :::i1~:w1:-:c\n.3re3s .nen\nir:vicea i,\n, :e:u:ii:-:g e~oe,:.::!:-:ces 3o\nircpri3,e ~o: ::-:e ::-::..:.:\n1c\ne .:\nr 3oili!:y le' els: (.:.) oral ~xp:essicn (2) ~!.s~:ning comp:enensicn U) :eac :.ng c:mp rehens :.on (,) -nat:-eciat~cs calc~lat.:.cn ( :) .-nat~ematic3 reasoning The team :TIUst oetermire\ni severe 1iscre\niancy :eteen icnievement and intellectual aoil.:.ty in one or more\nf t:Me above-named areas. Sum-nar!.zefa: om ?. L. ]4-142, 3ect.:.cn :~:a.5-.0-543 ucoa.S.:.C-543 as ..,e..,11: !es.:.gnated) 00136 -5- - J. Ooservac.:.on: At least one evaluation team lllel!'bero ther than the d'U.ld' s regulu teacher snall ooserve the child's acadelllic performance in the regular classroan setting, 4. Written report: The team snall prepare a written report of the results of the evaluation. The r~ort must include a statement of: a. whether the child has a specific learning disability, b. the basis for making the determination, c. the relevant behavior noted during the ~bserv~tion of the ct,ild, d. the relationship of that benavior to the child's academic functioning, e. the educationally relevant medical findings, :r any, f. hether there is a severe disc:epancy bet,teen achievement and ability which is not correctaole without special eO'JCation ano related services, and g. the determination of the evaluation team concerning the effects of envirorvnental, cultural, or economic disadvan~age. Eaci team memoer shall certify in writing whether ':he report reflects his or her c:::nclusion. rr it does not, the team merroer rust suomit a separate statement presenting his or her conclusions. E. Evaluation Confer~e Within thirty (30) calencar days following the c:::~let!on of 3:.,: f:::rmal evaluation activity, the Evaluation/Prograrrrning Conference rust be held. Notificat!on of t.'\"le parents should precede this conference by a mini!IUII of fourteen (14) calenoar days. If the parents do not respond to the first notice 'llithin seven (7) calendar oays, a second notice lll.lst be sent. Sa,rple Forms F and F-l are appropriate for the required notificati~. Every effort rust be made to inform the parents of the scheculec ::inference and its purpose. If the parents fail to respond at all, or indicate that they ::o ~ot wisn to participate, the conference lllJst prcce~ ithin the thirty (30) calendar cay ti11e f:3111e. The Evaluation/Progranmi~g Conference is called and chai:ed :y the pr:::fessional who as cesignated at trie Refer:-al Conference to assune :esoonsioili:y #:: ~aving ~~e cecision carried out. It is c~:.-!.seo of 3 11in!!T'I.Jomf three (3) 11emoers ar: 11ust incluce at least one professional ccmpetent to review and !.nter\n::i:et ~~e eval\"..Jat.:.:n :esults. Aoditional members shal.!. include persons such as the follow:.ng: l) the stucen~s :Jarent or\nuardian, 2) the student's present teacner, 3) other professionals or soec!.al ec\"...cation oersomel who may be involved in providing services. The stuoent may be !.ncluoeo .:.n al: or part of the Conference, when appropriate. After reviewing all the oata, the person! attending trie Sva!_ac!.:::n/ ?rograimiing Conference will: (1) Oe~e:mine wnether the stuoenc is nancicacpec.\n5ee ?rcg:am Standards and E..'..cibilitv Cr!.teria For Scecial E:::lucation. ::-:e cnilc coes not meet ttle el.:.gioility cnteria, tne oecislon of cne .::cmm.:.::ee ,,ill be \"hat no special eoucacion services are neeceo.) (2) Sp~!fy the primary hanoicapping condition if the stucent is determined to be hanoicapped. (3) Design an Individual Educational Plan (IE.OJ. (See i:!I. ?RCG~AMMit-CA. lso see Sa11-pleF orm J for developing the I.S.P.) (4) determine appropriate placement for i~lementacion ,r the Individual Educational Plan. Decisions must be based on careful analysi\nof the evaluation caca. Severity of handicapping condition, behavioral cnaracteristics, and emotional needs of c:ie student 111.Jsbt e considered in making plac=t and service decisions. -6- 00137 ] 1 I I 1 1 A cent '.r.uvm 'J f ecucat'.cnal services ror nandlcacced stucents ls :ecui:eo. Serv lee set t!ngs vary ac:c:olng to ::ie severity or tl-e stucent' s nanclcao. The\n:,lacement decision ':imulateo at the :'.vakat1cn1Prcgramming C.:::nference :nust aaoress th!.s ccnt'.r.uum of services to assure that ':.he stucent' s !nc'.vlcual ::01.icaticn ?~an can :::e !.\nnc\n.ementeo .'..n the least :estr.!.c~lve settir.g. The continUI.Jffl of services ls as follows: l. Regular Class - Indirect 3erv1ce (resource consultant or 1:lnerant instructor) 2. Regular Class - Some Dire:t Inst:uction (itinerant inst:uctor) 3. Regular Class/Resource Room (up to 50% of tne instructional cay in a qesour:e Rocm) .:i. Self-Ccntained Class with/it:-:out 'l.egular C~ass (miniirum of 50% of instr:.Jctional cay in self-c:::ntained) 5. No Instruction in Regular :lass (special Oay Service facility) 6. Residential School 7. Hospital Program 8. i-'omeoound Inst:uction All cecisicr,s :nade at t.:ie :'.'lal-..iat:.cn/P\n:,\n:arrmi:ig '.:.:::nference are :ec:r::eo on an :'.valuaticn C.:::nfere!\"1CCe ecision ,or~ simi:l: tJ ~2\"'0:e ,o:~ G arc si\nrec :iy ::iose 3::enoir,g the c:infe:enc~. ~t il'IJSt 3lso :e si\nr.~~ Jy ':..~e :~civicual ~c::ti:-:i3:.:a~:,\"!l/ :esocnsi:~e fur scecial\nervices in :he Oist:ict. At .'..eas~\nne ::i::fessional is ces:.\nna:ec as :esoons:.::e fer ensuring ::nt ::ecisions :eacneo at ~:,e .::-,alyatiJn/?::g:arrming :::nfe:e!\"1ce\nre ca:::.eo out. ?arents/guar-:lians ~st :e\n,rovi:ea\n#rit:en scacemenc :f :~e i::2c:s::n :Js:.r.g :an 300:cp:-iate ?are.it Notification ,arm ~xpla.:.ning ::,e :easons leacing :o ::r.e cec:.sion. Sairple F\"o:~ rl is an exarrpie :if an appropriate ~er~. Not.:.f:.caticn or :ne :ecision -:iust ::ie -:iaoe ~i::nin sev~., ( 7J :alencar .:ays of the :'.va.'.Jation1P::::\n:=ir.c\nC.:r,ference :f\n:a\ne!\"1tS are :iot\n::-ese~:. A ,cme contac: ,1nc/o: '1ome v:$iC -~st:! \":1aC#en en :~er! ~s any :eas:r. ~o ~eli~ve :~a::-!\na:en:s ~ay :ec_::~ assistance :.n ..r.cers~anc!r.g :~e nc::~!.cat!.\nn J: :~a :'.valuat::r.,~:::\n:\n-~i~c\n:\nr.fe:ence :ec:sion. All ~:J:-en:: e~ ...e.s ::s ~c: ~Jr'::\"er: nf':r-:at!:n s~cu:: Je :esccr:cec :.: 3S -:t.J::i\u0026lt;:/\ns\ncssi:Jle. ~ny\ner:!nenc !~f~:~ac!\nn :e~a:~!rg sce:!31 !C~cac~~n s~:,::es. 1ssc:.:..3:e~ ~ea!~al 3nc icc:al 3er,ices, :,are!\"': :r\nani.:a,:i.~ns, and :areri: :r:grJms sr.cu.:.: =~\n::::vi:e~ :: :are!\"ts. ?3:-erical ass.:..s:ance .:...,. . ~:icer\n:recac.:..cnof ~13.:.\"Jat:.v:ea c.1 :Jr oc.~er -:-:a~:-!:S:e ::J.:..~~r.t\n: ~ ::--e :cucJ:.:..:r.al sta:us of ~-e\n,~cent m.Jst Je\n:,rovi.:ed. ?arental :onsent\nnust :ie ootaineo oefore initial\n:,.'.ace~e!\"1~J r J ~anc!.:Joc:ec st:.JCe!\"1t :n a arog:am orovi.:ing sc:ec!.al eoucJt.!.cn ano :elateo servi,:es ...s !.r,c\na ',:\".1\n:.,,ilu ::i 3amc:e =-o:::i L ::.,ceot\nor evaluation ano initi ,l\nilacement, consent ..,ay '\"'Ot :e :ecui:e-: 35 1 -::::no::::n of any :ienefit to ':.'1e parent or cr.ila C\n:nt!.:iwation of placement :n :re same set::.ng :ces not requi:e an annual consent form. ~a ental 3\u0026lt;\n::eement :o c:-e annual :e,iew ,no .c:eacance Jf tne rE? thereafter il!'plies consent. 11 ,weve:, snculd a cnange in placement or service jei:very occur, an uooateo placement consent\nnould ::ie octained. rifteen ,15) calenoar days foEo ing\n:,arental notif:::Jt::::n of :::ie C:valuat.!.on/Prog::a!T'ming :::orference Ceclsion, the recommeno, a serv i:es snall oe\n:::::viced, unless tne\n:,arent/gua.aian oo:_ects to ::ie placement. If\nucn an :ejection is receiveo pr:cr to :ne exoi:ation of_ the f 1-teen ( 15) calenoar day per ice, the s :~cent shall remain :.n t:ie then curreN. eoucat ~anal pl 1cement penoing the outcome of tr e approoriate :eview ::cceoures. The oarent/\nuaroian and tM sc:,ool ::istrict may agree to a temporary placement .::ienoing tne .:utc:me of t,,ose proceoures. To the maximun extent approoriate, exceptional children :.n .:lrkansas shall Oe eoucated with chilaren wno are not hanoicappeo. Special classes, se:,arate sc!\"lool!.!\"1go r otrier removal of hanoicappeo Children from the rec\nular class environment snail occJr :ni, hen the nature or severity of the nanoicao ls sucn tnat ecucation in re\nular clJsses witn tne use of suoolemeritary aios ano services cannot oe satisfactorily acnieveo. Furtner, it is ~he policy or tne Arkansas Deoartment or ::c~cation :h'lt \u0026gt;ianolcaoceo cnilcren nave the r.!.ght to be eoucateo 1 :n their non-nanaicacpeo\n:eers, unless dear ev icence Ls avai:acle ~tiat partial or full :emoval is aesiracle for the elfare of tre cnilO or other children. 00138 -7- - When an exceptia,al child 111.CSbte usig,ed to a special program, ec1Jcational goals snall be specified. If-en tnese goals 1r11 111et, the student shall be returned to the most normal setting possible, consistent witn the d'lild's capacUities and eci.cational needs. G. Independent Evaluation- The local school district shall inform parents at the Evaluation/Programning Confererce that they hav,! the ril1lt to obtain an independent evaluation at puolic expense if they disagree with the evaluation provioed by the local sehool district. However, the local school district may initiate a hearing (see Part IV, Section I) to show that its evaluation ls appropriate. !f the hearing decision is that the evaluation is appropriate, the parent still has the rig,t to an independent evaluation, but not at public expense. Ir the parent obtains an independent evaluation at his or her own expense, the results or the evaluation: l. ITIJSt be consicered by the State and local educational agercy in any decision made awnidth respect to the provision or a free appropriate pu::,lic educatioo to the Cl\"lild, 2. may be presented by either party as evidence at a hearing re\narding that child. rr a hearing officer reQIJests an lnoependent evaluation as part of a hearing, the cost or the evaluation lllJst be at p1..0lic expense. Any and all evaluations conducted at pl.tllic expense ( including independent evaluations) :11Jst be conducted by persomel licensed and/or certificated by t\"le apprcpr!ate regulatory agencies and/or boards according to Arkansas law. ~or the purposes or this sect!on, \"!ncependent tvaluation\" means an evaluation c~ted by a qualified examiner who is not e!!Cloyed 'Jy the public agency responsible for the education of the child in question. -8- 00139 r [ I I ..- \\:! i r( ( Cl u a: n r- ~ n. r OJ a, c u u r. J. 1fl c \"' ,. ,, ,u 11 ,~. ~ ft I' n CJ 1, ll t,f) .! I (l ~: ,'\n- ,, .,, r ::,1 ~ o 1'1 I I, Vl -f~ \n, f -~ ., I tl QI V'I n , n \nu :: (\\J r. .~~: :u fl u ~~ ,, 3 :..! ~ u ., d ,: t\\t '' rn  11 Vl U ,,. f1J CU l. -4 VI u .... QJ nJ -4 .\nI I 1 :., .., tU .~!.':\"!.-1 ~'c Vl -.. -4 .. .., rJ V1 ._. \"1 n \u0026lt;, a, }! l) u . t Vl CJ\\() 1,  IJ r t, .- lJ at ~ -t n. r, ~ \n:. ~ Vl It :u ~:': ~ :., .?~ V, ~ g ID ... ,n 11 U QJno n J 11 :i_:JI \"\"~ ~\n: o~~ l,.!!m ~ ~:r . \n~,~ ~ (lJ t' J w 'O Q .... \"' CC.G)V'I~~ ~ '\" r:\n td .?: .?.5 .aJ QJ r: a, -~' a, e r. \u0026gt;-tJUO._\"OJftlC i, rJ U U OJ IL u:J \" .. , QJ  ~ f QI 'c  ~ ~ ...~., ~1f :r i ~: ~ t: g-4 m Cl.I CJl'' n,\"' Vlnc'lcm 1.-,Vlrl 0 -~CJ\\~ 5 j :.1 Vl L in  1 f1J lJ'I L . 1 I 1 ,J ~ C o \u0026gt; er, m J ro CJ --a1 , C,,t _1, toi , fu. uQ u:, CJI a, ......\u0026gt;. ' C. I, C (ti ,-4 C...  I f) ....._ r'O -1 ~ ~ \n~ ~ rl 1\n111 c. ca , 1  1 rr1 ,, o, .J '- \u0026gt; I 1 u,u_,. QJ .. , u, o:\u0026gt;ftl'._OU 1-, _._, \u0026gt; 01 C , .. 0. V'I liJ 1, .. t 0 u VI\n) ,'. at , ~.r \".I 1.1 . I .. ,,, ,, r l\"l ' ,'. ,n 0. , u u 'C\"J  D L 'C\" ~ \" U .!, .f,Jn. n u f~ ,, ,o tl' .r. .. E E r,n. tl' ,u, n ..... Ll .\"\",'' C,J. ,, n ., f . lJ' . !t \u0026lt; ::, ') ,L., . 'L\"I _, l.1 . . ' .,.'.,,'! 11 '\" .I. , \"r  E' QI CJ ~~ 11 t..1, .r-. ,' u C l,1, ,, 1:1 0 ., l !\"\n' ....  I - '::\", C :\n., 111 '.\", 'I ., .\",' .L., r,, .\"..,', \" ti I. \"' n '\" .. c.. 01 u J \"VI ., :\nC \" LI m\"\"'' 11 n\",' .\"., i, \"' ti u\". .', -?'' . u L '\" C ..\".. ,. . m u J LnI,  .r.n, LI OJ (J .\",' \" i,.,, 11 Cl \".' \" ' ' '\" - ,., ff' I.J \u0026lt; C AJ OJ ll tJ I\\', 11  '\" fJ L l1 ,., QJ n n1 I l 1, Ul 111 II Jlf ,n l1 L rJ I 0\"' I ./,!, tto mE tn 1, V, '!' u, 0 t: (\\ r1  ., 1, 1  rt f/1 1,, !'1 11 n, ,, 1-' OJ ( I .'.~ l: O ,, (I ff! 0 J ,, n tn fO I u C.., ~ J tJ Ill ~~ '- '\" ,-, Q.I 1,1 -~\n: Qt It .1.1 i ',\", u'-',  r It l) ~ \"' ~ , ~ ,, :~ ~ ~\nt: lit w 8  1 (. Vl QJ \u0026lt;.: aLJr L: '1\", OJ 01 I 1 F  OJ -I n U O\" ,nm --4 ,, ,,, n Vl .. 1 f'II rJ u .,, ftJ OJ Ill ,.:. (. \"' I I I I , f . QI IJ l.1 .._, t OJ :-J{\"(l 111  ' C\":' ,O,J, .1.n, (lJ t._ VI .U-. ,. o .r.u, () U Hl I ( l) .. I ,.1 lJ ll , fl ,\nOJ I I V, 1: U W  I ('. U(. _ __,t, . , uO J 1(1 ,,, t\" )  1' I.J lfl 111 (\"I 1 \" u\"' 01 ,, U ?-' ~: I\n~! ~ ~ ~ lt C,:,  1  I .J f\" II U t1 . , '\"' L -\u0026lt; rn , t1 r -~ (11 ~ ~ rr.uo  j .~: H1 lo ~ ,t\n~ ~\n: ~ ~ t I t, n u OJ ,, 1#? :i -~ tJ ., u. . ., n ,, .h~' -~fi: VJ. ' 1n ., nl ) If' W ll .t.J , n n, J ,, t u 01 I I (11 I~ .1 lJ t t u tJ r_n ~~ ~ C i?~ o., ~ Lt fl ., tl' ,\"! ~ :\n.~ ~, 'n ,' ~ u , . a a.,(: lf' 1'1 J\n. ~ g' 0 i!~ IIJ t. ... I Lf u n 1, m 0 ,_. lf' \"' :, o, U Vt (I I, .. , C U o ,_, o r.: .. , 0 OJ IU _., '- U I ti U U tU C f L 1n m a, n :-- .. ,u - a, .., nC n ~ '\"  GJ  I  I lJ JI :J It U (JU J 0  (J It ~I , ... ,._, ,., J ..., av, o JUL C L' rtJ  , v, n \u0026gt;'' t '\" ~' .:, l: IJ II) tn LJ ( ,, II.I QJ J uu,. .. ,J -~: ~n ,n L 111 l 11 u  r . a lul I, . '\" Ill In - r .V.I ..I - V, C 11 I I 1 11 ,, -1 u' (l  I ,u, .u, ,n n, :f, ,\n'\" u a, b LL\u0026gt; '\" l1 ,, 'lJ  ,, t I,'. , \"IJJ '-- co u m L ., u n C JI tJ 111 L i?\"' ~~ -~ o, OJ CJ' ,~J u~,, -~i II\" LI II.I ~ C ,,. ot I fu1 1 n, 'r\". (I I.I II  , r'1 U (1 I' L o1 U 10 I I , I J .. t '' II I.I 11J 1_, Vl L. \"'r - U I ,C. . \" . a r\" ' \" u 'u\" J (I '.\" ' ':.\", .1..? \u0026gt; I L' ,ci rt u a, f\\) J.J C I I) V, ,., ..I I 1n fT1 ..II 'I) C: r .,f  I ,, ,, t ' ..  1 ,., lJ r\" ,., , . l IJ '  ) lI 11 L.  ,j, 'I, I 1/l \",I, ,.1. n '\" rt II :.: ~- .'.:: ~: !,! ::, ... ll 111 lJl'I C.,' ' ,, '1 '' ., ( t ti ~':  ' ~: ! : ,,, t1\" 1 (J 1\"i'  f,\n, ., 'J 11 /II c ,. r Ill I 1 I\n~: :/ ~I \"' .... I,,, f (' I II I 1  f)  I I ' It ~: rt 1, n  ~. I I. 1'! ( to I' r, I I I 1 ~I ~ r, ~\n:,: U I h ., 1 ' Q.  1, I(. ( 1/1 '\" I I n I n) , JI I , I (\" ,,  ,., I '11 'I \"'' , '11 ~ .. ,:' ~~ ,C, . \",'. J,!. . ,:,, '\\)  I It, II'''' ... ,, 1, '. , .. \" !\n01 L   f.' \" . ,. ,' .. I I .,. ., ,, ' ( ,J '  , ll ~ ~\n~ ,, ~  I.'.: Iii ,, ~i 1J  ~ '. I d ~ !., l \"' \n... t , . ' 1 Cl n )' 't ) '1 I,. ,I I ,, J '1' I, . .,,. ',,   I C f'l1 'II U 11 ~ r I , 11 ,-, I , ~a,,,. r OJ J Vl 1' I,~, ..I I n1,. I ~ - '''L... ,, \" :n I ~ I I I .. , ' .. - t lt n n..1 l. ,, .J ~ : \"\"., I,J ., ,M, (' ~.,.:: '-:' : :1', ,. c.,::   1 f 1., I r n ' !,: ,,: ~: i.: II I' f I  ,, l ,,t '\\ nt ._ lI ,. I I 1, i,,.1 : I '1 11 'I,, ~t l' ' ' l ! ( JI ftl , J. .L. .ll ( ,-, :t Q '\nI ti r l .. ,.,~ :. ?J' ' t\"l lt . l\n. ' r: !:: t  I l) 'II I I \" ( Vt J  I a ...... ' 'l l t., 11  f'II fl  I f?I fJ f I' 1 11' It I !I f'I  ,,, ,,111 '0 , I I' o I l\"I l' ,_, t  ~I 1'1: l\u0026lt;I ' I\n:~\n,: _:.,.:! ! ,~. I '' ~:: :\n \" I :' ...:.. ',', t.1 ,' , .I.C,. ...o . , .... , .. 'I'' j, ,.,, I II'  ..lo r,, .,. , I, ., lf'. 0 ,I. I I ' \u0026lt; ,.,  r I .,  ~  V' , I I 1 fl 0' I I t\"' ! ! -~{ -~  '  I \\ 1' I, f\"\"' I\\',  II ',I..,, ,  f  I  C\" -~ .. -\". ,, ., n .I . L' 1~\" :l. ., ,:, I .. I II .'.: :.! t ,. \u0026lt;f ,I , r I 111 I\" I :... . ,, .. , l I) lo .. , 11 l''I U l! .  n I, I' ' l ,. l\" '.'~ \n: l'n . , I .. ,, fl ' I C. .\n, ,,. :? -. ' '!_ 1\n: ?' ,. ,. ,, ' ., i' :: fl . ',.  l, . 1 I\n.\ni\n, . ,. \":- :! ( ' .I..' ' ~: !: ,, '\" :,, \".. . ,t, , .~..- ,. , .. \"' ,, ti \"' !! ' \" I, . '\" i:.\" ' :' 'J I ! ~ . '., , r\" Lo I' r, \".\n, uI ,, II .. ,. :: r \" ,, 'II I' ' ,, II :?\n: u, 'I' :~ : f_\n,. n ') I t:. : ~ I _. ~ I,\",  ' .J .,, u, '1 1 ....:, .!.,, fl f. n.. ,\" . . .,,. \" t L' .: I ~. ~ ':: ,. t r (, . t. .. ,'. ,,. ,. - Cl' ,:~ (. ( .I . ' . , '. .n., 11 'I'._.,  ']I !. \".' .\n, p ~- ,,,. ,', I U .. ,. '\nr: ,.__ ( ,., _, J.J , ..... , u rtJ  I 1 .__ U f: OJ L' r I, IJ r'  ( . }!i ::.f J~ ~ _,_ .. ~~,..a, r: \"' '\n, ~ M   !i C ,., 11' tJ t\" ,, I I f'\" ~ -~ -\n'-~ :\n C ':J ~ v\nV r ~ f: C, '\" . ., u ,..,\n~~ ~ t\n: :! '-' t'I ,r ~ O ,I . . .. ~~ 'I d r n (I'/' I' fl .. . ,, r .. ,'\n_:: :, / ~.~:'. ~ ~\n... '_j L I' t t - 11 'It L L {} tJ  t ' :-- n. 1 n ']1 l -(I' C: !J' C r L' t .~:'' .,_.'~.~ 9 IJ QI o t ,1 C u U 1 C (' J U QI VI ll - I:  I E !{! .,, ~. ~! ~ r: ,, ........ , ,, .1 'J , .. '. ' J .J \"' IJ c .. .,-, tl L'   - 'l' fll ff_\\! F00i\n'\nt:::\n: !'\n,,.. ~   : J '1 .. ,. !. . I,:  -I ,, .,  . .u , ' ~ C'VI.C L--' 'lJ ..... u 1,1'1 r\n,, r, or. --ov__, -t !~I' '\n':: ,:\n\u0026lt;:,: ,. r I 1. ... - r_:, _. 0.: r- ~ C \"tJ .... ~ t.' f\"'J  L, - L C c,\n:,. u I - ~ g ~: ~ i. ~~ ~ ~ \\~ _,,\n:~ ! .. ... (_ .C...:.. -... ,.. r: u- ,.\n:. (\nl, C:' \"!: . .~,\n' r ,, u l .... '.\"-:: r_ t:  ....\"., ~ ~ E\" -~ ,. .. ,_, , .S -~\n\"=~:~ ~ :j\ni'. .-. ~ .. '.'-.:\nl\ni\nUC J.J ( - _. C ,., -:' ,. ,.. ,::, ,... '..! 11 k J\n\" .-1 .\n.: '. ,. ...:. -: -. u .. ,. !: j I ,:. !, I  ,\n: . ]! . I' .\n, .. :1 -. ' ,L I \"I ' 0. .. rl 0 0 I interest grou0s or clu:is. C:acn puclic agency ITl.JSt\nirovice spec.!.al ecucat!.cn 3M :elatec ser,::es :o a anc!.cacpeo cnild in accorcance ,i :.n an inciv1cualized education plan. However, tr.e :nciv icualizeo ecucation plan is not a oinoing contract, and federal law ooes not :equire :~at any agency, teacner, or omer person t::e held accountaole if a cnilo aces not acnieve t.\"'e c\nrowtn\nirojected in the amual c\noals and objectives. s. Annual ~eview of Child Progress All scecial services are to be vie~ed as :.ransitional arrangements, 1th the -\noal or changing services to :::e ,-nost acPrcpriate ln response to ~,angi:ig c:,ilc ~eecs. F~r :nis reason, continual monitoring and review of ct,Hd\nirog:ess :.a1\u0026lt;es :,lace f.:ect.\nently to 3s~ re tre rost appropr:.ate service For tr,e cnilo. The :evie'II shall incluce: (:) :e.evant .:.nFor:nat.:.onf rom al. these\nirov.tc!ng .:.nsc'-.lct.:.:::n=3aln d/or relateo services, (2) an 3nal\ns.:.s of t:-e c:iil::l's ce: for:nance !.n _all acacem1c areas, ano (3) an anal,sis of :.\"le C.\"l:..o's :ur:ent soc:.al ano/or acaptive func::oning. Thls :ev .. e'II 1s mace in :elation co t:ie c:,i o's !ncivicual Education Plan. The plan is uccateo in a :corcance it:, c:,e res.\nlts of '::..--e:e vie\"' at least annually. Revie'II of cni.O's progress snoulc1 be mace at any t.:.me l..pcn reql..est :if aoprcpr.:.ate :nofessicnal personnel anc/or the cni_d's pare,ts. An annual report of eac:, nanoicaoped cnild' s progress '.s\ni:-epared .,ear tne eno of eacn school year, with ,ri~ten results suomitteo to t.\"le pa:ents ano co ~r.e :::.rc:.pal for sc.'iool records. one professional is designateo by the princical as :-esponsi:iie for\ni:epar:.ng tne annual reoort. The cnild's inoiviCual eoucation plan is uooateo in acc::-::ance it:i :-esults of the report. Parents have tne ric\nnt to attend ano ce .:.nvolvto in tr.e annual revie'II. rr :-e-evaluat.:.on is :-ecui:-ed ano agreed con at t:-:e ::i-e ::if annual :-evie.- ano t. e sixty (60) day time line 'or c::mplet.:.ng tne evaluat:.Jn ,cu:::i , 3::. :l..:-:ng tr.e :.:.me\n::~cl.:.: scncos are not in session, special ag:eement oeceen pare:--t 3nc sc\"'.ool .:ay specify :.--:e .Jate 'llhen re-evaluat.:.cn cculo reasonaoly :e excec:eo :o :e ~c~c:eceo. Nr:.::e-, :oc~mentaticn stating the oate for completion of the :-e-evaluat.:.an ano reasons fer ::ie extens.:.cn :eycnc\nixty (60) cays are required. c. Hanoicaoped St:.icents :01aceo inc: 'le'er:ec :::i \"::.,at~ Sc!'1cols Under .J.ct 102 of 1973 as amerceo anc ::--e St:\n:? \"~an 'Jr ::::~:::.al ::-:ucat:.::in, local sc.'iool distric\u0026lt;\ns and public ac\nenc!.es are\n::e:-mit':ec :a olace .,anc:.:acpec ::-::.:::~n :.n\n::rivate schools provioing special ecucat.!.on. ?uol.:.c La\" ]4-i.~2 .~as necessitatec a clarification of tl\"le policies regarding\nirivate scncol\n:::lacement: 1. 11hen a scticoi cis::r.:.:::t or\n::uol!.c ac\n~r.cy i:i ac::o:::ance it.'\"1 S:a::e :egulations has cecermined :.\"lac ~\"le mst ac~rcp:!.ate :::c\n:~m f:::r a ~ancicac:e:: s:Jcent :.s 3vailable on a puoli: sc..,ool :amcus and :::ie\n:::a:enu forego ::iat Joco::i..n.:.:1 :.:i aver :Jf\n:::lac.:.ng the st:.ioer.t in a\n::r.:.,ate\ner.col, :nen :ne scnool a!.s::i::c 's :'.:.ranc:.a:. :espcnsibil.:.:y for eCl.cat:.:--g ~~at\n,~:enc .:.:\nal\no aive::l. 2. ~nen a sc:--ccl Jis:::.c: :ece:,i:-:es :.a: aco::::::r:.a::e ser,:.:es :arr.c: :e\n:::rcv:.cea at tne site :\nf .:r.e _:.:. i ., ::iey -:iay encase :o ::int:act ith anot.\"ler agerc-\nt'.J '.molement the i:ioiv:.cual educat:.~n\n:::lan. ?a:ent.s .no ::.s.\ng\nee it:, Sl..c., i\niiiCe\"le,t. :eci\nion nave t,\"1e rignt to appeal. 3. The fol:::.ng -\n:eps rnust :e ~3Ken i:h :es\niec: :o :~e ::ic:.,i:uai. :::ucat:.cnal ?lans cevelccea ror st~=ents placeo in ~r:v=3r:e rac:.lity: a. Eacn sc~ccl ~ist\n:.ct Jr =~c!.:.c a~ency Jr.all ~~ :esconsi:l! for ~ne =~velccment and implementation of an :::.\" r-c: ~acn ,ano.:.:.icceo c:iil.:: .no is p~aced in or referreo to a :rivate :ac:.lity, ls enrol:eo in a ~aroc:-i.al or other\n:irivate school, ano :eceives spec:al !Cuc3ticn 1no relateo servi :es From cnat school district or ~uolic a~ency. b. Each sc.'1ool district or\n::uolic agency shall ae responsible for the initi,1tion of 1Teetings or conferences for tne pur\niose of oevelcoing, rev ie.,.ing, or revising tne IE?. c. Eacn sc:icol district or\n:uol:.c a~ency snall ::e respcns.:.::ile for Jrov iding a representative of the private school witn tne copor~unity to attend the conference at wnich tne ::? is cevelcceo. tr tr.is reoresentat:ve cannot attend, tnen the scnool oistrict or agency ITl.JSt use oc.:,er ,netnods such as telepnone calls, pre or post conference meetings, etc. to ootain participation. This ,T,eeti:ig snall ta1\u0026lt;e place cefore tne nanoicapped cnilO is placed in tne private program. -10- 00141 r l l 4. d. After tne ,\n:,i .!.:: as ence :e::: '::\"le\n:ir\n.v ace sc:ioo.!. :ir ~ac!.ll :1 , any -neet!.r:\ns :o :eview ano :evlse ::-.e c:-::.:cs i~ eay ~e !.nlt!.ateo :r ::ro..c:eo oy t:ie ::r.:.vate sc:-:ccl or fac.:..!.i:1 . s1..c:1 eeet.:.nc\ns a:e conci..c:eo, it is t:-e\ncncol Oist:ict' s or cublic a,\nency 's resoonsibill:y to insure :nat trie recuirements for\n:iarental\n:iar:ic!.\n:i.tion ano consent are carrieo out. e. Eac:i school d1s:::!ct or\n:iuol!.c agency mus: insure ::?s are cevelcced for all randicappeo cn1lcren it olaces !.n ::ir!.,ate scnools. r. T-e school district or\n:iuclic a,\nency ~ay :eculre ~:,e ::rivace sc:iool or facility tJ furtner :ef!.ne ~e :~ :evelcceo at ':ne ~valuat.:.cn/\n::,\n:alT'l!ling ::nference. g. A '.l of t~e above :equi:e'l!ents also apply :o .,anci::ac::ed stuoents err::il.'..ed in p:!.vate or :\narccn!.al\ncreels -ho :eceive scec!.al ecucat!.en f:cm ::ie CUJllc a~ency or :ocal sc~ool cist:!ct. For c:iilcren enroLed in\n::r!vate sc~cols Mr o c!.st:.:.cts or puol.!.c a,\nenc.:.es, :ne fo.!..:.ewings n\nere not :i aced or :efer:eo Oy ac\n:,ly: scnool a. To the extent :onsis::ent shall make orovision ror\n::r:.vate scnools in scecial with Title vr-a funos. -i'::i ::iei: '1L -oer anc ~:cat.:.er., local sc.\":ool c!.s::::.::s ':ne ::ar:.:.c.:.::, :.:.en :if ~ane:.caccec cn:.:c:::en enrol:eo in eci..cac.:.:in aro :ela::eo services f:.:,anceo -nolly or .:.n\n::art b. ihe neec!s of Jri' ate scnool ,ancicaooed c:-il::::en, ::ie ,unoer -no ,,ill\n::art:.::.\n:i:.ate :.n Ti:.!.e VI-3 services, ano :.-e :ypes or scec.:.al ecucac.:.:n and :elaceo ser' ::es ,,nicn !:.~e local sc:iool :Hs::::.c: -111\n:ircvice 11us:: :::e ::ete:.,:..-~eo af:er c:insi..l:a-~:n -n\n.,\n::ersons ,\u0026lt;nowlec,\neacle aoeuc : . .,e ,eecs :if :.-ese :n .. .!.::en. The oasis 'o: :::-:e cec:.sicn is ~:-.e leve.!. cf ser' !.:es orcviceo .,anc:.caopec :::-::.:cren enroUeo .:.:i ,:1..ol.:.c sc:iools. c. Se:1i:es co\n:r:.,a:e scree~ arc:.:aecec cn:.::::e:-: ay -~ ::i:oviCed :.-::iuc\nn suc:i ar:Jr~ements as :uai ~n\n:l~~enc, ~CLcacicnal :3c.:.= 3nc :e:~visicr., ana ~~e ~=~vision of 110oile ecucaticnal ser,i::es ar\n:1 e~u!.\n:,ment. d. A lccal :\nc:-ocl j.!,st:!:: eay ::::ivice scec:.al ec-~cat.:.:::n ire :elat~c ser,::es to :ir.:.vate sc:iool rianc.:.:Jcped ::i.:.:::en ~ni::, are :::.:~re\"'i: ':::n ::ie\ncec.:.a~ e:1..cJt.:.:::n \u0026lt;1nc relateo services :.t ,:r\n:iv:.:es :o :1..ol!.c scneol c.-:..:.cren, :.f c.-e diffe:erces are :iecessary to ,11eet :re scec:.al .,eecs\nif ::,e :i:bace\n::-:ocl iar.c:.cai::\n::ecc :i:.:.a:en, ano ~.,e scecial ecucat.:.cn ar.c :e:acec serv :.:es are ::rr::anc.:.e !.n ~uali:y, sc:ce, ano\n~f c. .c. -uni y f ...r \"\"a- L...,:\"\"\"4a-tn ::: :~cse\n:-oviCe~ -=~ ::...a:!.=\n.:..-:eel ,:!1!.!.c:en ii::i ~eeas w e\n~al lrnco\n'\n~c~.----~ - ~ :,~o:!c sc~col :e:sor.ne! ~ay =~ ,ace 3,a::Jc:~ :.~ ::-e:- ::'i\nr. :------ 5C'.\"\"CC.~.3 c:..:.:.::es :r:l\n1 to t~e e.\"c\u0026lt;~ rit -e,:es3a:, . .J : ::, :..:e s~:, ~.:es =~~-,: =~-:=y ..... Q ,ar:::..:3c\n:::ec ::ii~:ren ana cn:y .-ne!1 :.,as~ sar,.:.:es lre ........ ::-a.:.:_1 ::::,.:.:e-: :, :.\"'le :::,ate sc:icol. ~3c~ lccal scnool 1ist:i=~ :::v:c1~g se:~!:es ~: :~!!::!~ ~~::!!ec :~ Jr.:.,ate sc:iools snall :naintain conc:.:iu.:,.g ac:ar.isc:a:.:.ve ::!\"'::ol ire ::.:~c::..:n :v~= ::-:csa ser' iCes. g. rne ser,ices provicaa ,,,ith f'. .r c: i...nce: 7i:!~ ,r--:, ..: : :l:.\n.:.:~e ,3r.c.:.:3oce:: :,::::=n enrcl:eo in\n:ir:.' ate scr.ools nay ~oc .:.rc!~ce :~e :ay~enc Jf sa!ar:.es cf :eac~ers Jr nr.er ef!'Oloyees of\n:1r:.,c1ce sc: eels exceot :r sa:,ices :er:::nec Jwtsi:e :~ei.: :egular ncurs of .Juty ano uncer ::uol:.c super,isi:n ano .:cr.::::il or ::ie ::ns::: ..c. :.:.cn of private scnool facilities. h. C:cuipment accuireo -it.\"1 funos _ncer Title ,r-a ,ay :\ne ::laceo on ::iri'lace sc:iool ::iremises for a limiteo per.:.oo cf t:.:ne, ouc t:-:e :.:.cl: :o ire acm~niscrative :cnc::-ol over all equipment 1\\.JSC oe cetai,eo ano exerc:.seo ::ya :uolic ac\nercy. In exercising aominlscncive ce,trol, !:he ::iuoli.c a,\nency sr:all -\u0026lt;ee::i recoros o: ano account for the eouioment, sna. l insure that !:.ne ecui::iment :s Jseo solely for the pur::ioses of the program or c::ojE:t, ano remove the :cui\n::ment from Che\n:,rivace sc:iool premises Lr nece,\nsary to avoio its being useo for ot11er\n:iurposes Jf the i::rogram or project. 1. Programs or projects car::.eo out tn public ~aclli~ies lnQ involving joint part1cicat1on by eligible nanc .cacoed ch110ren enrolled in private scnools and hanoicacped ch1ldren enrolled . , PL.Olic scnools, may :,oc include classes that are separated on the Oasis of scncol enrollment or t:,e rel!.c\n:.cus arfiliations of the Children. -11- 00142 J. Funes\nirovicea uncer Title ,r..a and ::,rcoerty oer:.ve::i f::::m '::iose ~t..nos 11ay ~at :::e used as an advantage to any private scnool. k. P:-ovisions ror serving\nirivate scnool nandicapped cnildren .11ay nc t include tne fi:,a\nc:.r.g of :ne existing level or instruction in tne private sc:iools. PAATI V. Il'-OIYICi.JAPl.R OTECTIONSA W PRCCECI.JRAS.L.F EGUAAOS A~ Prior Notice - Polley and Procedures Prior \u0026lt;tritten notice snall oe given :o tne parer.ts, guard!.ans, or sur:::ga:e\n::arents of a nandicappeo cnilo or a cnild .,itr, a suspecteo nanc icap Oy the ~ccal sc:icol :::.scr:.ct. ?::.or notice snall. oe affcrceo to the cn:.ld him/herself in tne event tnat r.e/sne :s :s years of age or older. The agency shall ,,ave :he opt!.cn of ei':ner ut!.1.!.zing the ::ontent ano n\nan:.zat.:.cn of the .,ritten materials proviced in :nis :::ocument for\nir::ivicir.g pr!.or not:.ce or ut::iz:ng any otner written materials so :cng as tney -neet the fellowing standarcs ar.d ir~luCe: l. a full explanation of all of tne procedural safeguaros avaLaol~ ta tne\n::arer.ts unoer tnis\niart\n2. 3. 5. 6. a Cescri::iticn ::\nf ':he ac:!.cn oroposed or refused '::ly ':he agency, an exolanaticn of ny the agenc, or::ooses or ref~ses co take ':ne action, and a Cesc::.::it!.cn of any ::pt:.ons !.n tne agency :cnsice:eo ano tne reasons ny :nose opt!.:ns ere :e~ec:ed\na cescr:.ot:.:::n :if each evaluat!.cn pr::ceoure, test, rec::ir-:l, :ir :ecor: :he agency l.Ses as a basis for the\nirc:osal or refusal\na ::escr:.::.::.:n ::if any :ther factors nlcn are relevan: :o :~.e age,-.::,' s pr:posal :ir refusal\nlanguage ..r,ce:s.:arcao:e ':o '::'le\neneral puol!.:: and :roviceo :.n t~e :\"'ative :anguage :f tne\n:iarer.t or Jt:\"'er -:ioce Jf ::11m.Jnicat:.on usea oy ':ne\niarent l.11less it is c~aa: ly not Feasible:: co so\nand an :iral :::-arislat:.on or a ::anslat:.on by :it:-:er 11eans t:, ':he event that t:ie iati,e lang~age Jr ot:-:er ~ace of :::ctrmuni::aticn of tne parent is ,ct a rit::.en language, so tnat ~,e\n:iarent ..rioers:ancs =~e :::intent of t:,e ~ot:ce,\nr.J a wr:.::en r~cord :e:ec:s that this t::-anslat:.on as\n::roviCed. Prior :iot.:.ce :nusc :e aff\":r:ed :n t!-e :':::i.owing .Jccas!.ons: 3. cest:uct:cn : f :.n fo:~ac.!.:n :n ac::JrCance 111itn :\nie ::nf :.:ent!a.!.!. :y Jr:ce~u:es\n1.i. refusal :y ::ie agency to amend stucent recor:s in ~c::r:ance ic:, ::ie c:ri f icer.:::al.:..- .: , :::ccec .. Jres\n5. en any :c:as:.cn hen t:-:e scnool district or:coses :o :nic:.3te ,.\n:-:anc\ne ::-e icentifi:at:.cn, ~valuat!.on, nr ~cucaticnal placement of u-:ie C:\"'i::\n6. on anv :ccasion nen ::ie scnool district refuses to ini:.:.a~e Jr c:iani\ne ::ie icentificat!.on, ~valuation, or acucation olace~ent of c:'le :nild. Prior ~otice relateo t:i :ef~rral recuires the following proceoures: l. Parents and otner parties may refer their child for c:n\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_238","title":"Enrollment, Little Rock School District (LRSD), North Little Rock School District (NLRSD) and Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD), gender and racial count, school capacity, and transfers","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["1997-10-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Educational statistics","Education and state","Little Rock School District","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","School attendance"],"dcterms_title":["Enrollment, Little Rock School District (LRSD), North Little Rock School District (NLRSD) and Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD), gender and racial count, school capacity, and transfers"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/238"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nt' (.'Ii,,,,. ~/1-' '{ I  .J\n1/ - - -- - - October 1 State Department Enrollment Report - LRS -- - - - All Enrolled Students: 02-0ci-97 --- - ----- ----------- ---- 001 CENTRAL Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total ~:, 13 10 10~8' B. 18 132 213 244 4 2 2 0 0 716 I w 11 1~-'I\n:) 26 147 168 201 2 0 4 4 1 0 653 ~ 12 _\nl.\u0026lt;} 0 97 104 104 138 0 I 3 4 0 452 r'I J., KF 18' I 1,\u0026gt;134~ 20 13 ~t 0 0 0 0 0 TOTALFOR:CENTRAL 97 384 505 596/lt 6 3 9 9 1 1J 002 HALL Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total \"I 3 10 ,s=r/ d 24 33 104 99 4 l 4 7 0 0 276 0 w II /'l! 1 w 21 31 92 89 4 2 5 3 0 I 248 - 12 .\u0026gt;./a C 31 42 85 76 3 1 6 2 0 0 246 1 KF 7'8'-',I 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 /'!O (1 s 4 6 3 ~o 0 0 0 0 0 14 TOT AL FOR: HALL 71 (O ,i180 107 289 272~ 1 4 15 12 0 1 \u0026gt;13,gfi 1 1i ~ L._..../ 003 MANNM/S Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 07 77 60 75 76 0 I 2 0 0 292 08 57 75 69 81 2 0 1 0 287 09 8 75 59 86 0 4 2 4 0 1 279 ~~i-- TOTAL FOR: MANN MIS iq 182 210 203 2434\u0026gt;llr2 5 4 7 0 2?p 858 PARKVIEW Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 10 51 87 70 84 3 4 I 0 302 11 68 75 83 80 2 1 3 0 0 313 12 54 83 51 96 v\\3 5 3 I 0 0 296 B,.,~ TOTAL FOR: PARKVIEW \u0026gt;\\\\\u0026lt;$173 245 204 260 ~ 8 7 5 8 1 o~'I 911 BOOKER Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 4 13 16 20 28 0 0 0 0 0 78 02 4 18 22 13 24 I 0 2 0 0 0 80 03 6 20 19 22 23 0 0 0 0 86 04 3 19 22 21 22 0 0 0 0 86 05 3 22 24 28 21 0 1 I 0 0 98 06 4 17 26 29 19 I 0 0 0 0 93 KF 4 18 19 17 21 0 0 0 0 0 76 ~?7 ft\n121 148 150 158pfi 3 4 6 0 0 ,~ 597 DUNBAR Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total Information Sen-ices Department - All Enrolled Students: 02-Oct-97 - ---- 07 52 42 77 86 4 5 2 3 0 0 271 08 51 45 71 82 3 4 2 2 0 0 260 09 48 53 69 57~ 4 3 2 0 240 /17 TOTALFOR:DUNBAR ~'I I 151 140 217 225 10 13 7 7 o,~ 008 FAIR Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 10 29 23 131 94 0 I 0 0 0 0 278 II 14 23 84 100 3 0 0 0 0 225 12 16 25 83 102 I 0 0 0 0 228 s 4 4 II 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 ~17 TOT AL FOR: FAIR ,ii 63 75 309 303(tl~4 1 1 0 0 '/ 757 009 FORST HT Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 07 34 34 77 68 I 3 0 2 0 I 220 08 36 20 66 76 3 0 1 0 0 0 202 09 27 26 81 74 2 0 0 0 212 s 3 I 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 TOT AL FOR: FORST HT f~' 100 81 231 221\u0026gt;1~5 4 3 2 0 1 ,6 648 10 OIO PULHTJ Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 07 56 47 84 65 1 2 2 0 0 258 08 53 52 78 66 0 2 0 0 253 09 50 53 66 75 I 1 1 0 0 0 247 s 4 2 2 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 :f11 TOT AL FOR: PUL HT J i\"' 163 154 230 201Ai'12 3 4 4 0 0 1i 767 011 SOUTHWST Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 07 12 8 68 74 2 3 0 0 0 0 167 08 23 11 82 58 0 4 0 0 0 179 09 6 6 65 65 2 3 0 I 0 0 148 s I 13 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 ,g~t' TOTA L FOR: SOUTHWST c,c4i2 26 228 198 #i( 4 10. 0 2 0 0 ,~ 510 012 MCCLELLA Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 10 26 23 147 152 1 0 0 0 351 11 21 22 128 125 0 3 1 0 0 0 300 12 18 19 103 109 3 1 2 0 0 0 255 s 1 2 17 9 t\u0026gt; 0 0 0 0 0 ~\u0026gt;17TOTALFOR:MCCLELLA ,~'7ti6 66 395 395 \"\" 4 5 4 0 0 013 HENDERSN Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total LR.soIn formation Services Department 2 Enrolled Students: 02-Oct-97 07 14 13 102 95 I 0 2 I 0 229 08 14 10 103 96 0 I I 2 0 0 227 09 22 13 104 103 I 0 0 2 0 0 245 s ii 2 0 17 4 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 o 23 \"lll., 52 36 326 298 t,'tl-2 3 5 o,re CLOVRJR Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 07 13 2 99 68 3 3 0 1 0 0 189 08 8 10 109 87 4 0 0 0 0 219 09 6 13 99 90\n_ 2 0 0 0 214 ~ci7, TOT AL FOR: CLOVR JR f'27 25 307 245~j 7 9 1 1 0 0 ,i 622 MABELJR Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 07 21 20 64 68 0 0 0 0 0 174 08 17 13 64 63 0 0 0 0 2 0 159 09 24 20 55 57 0 0 0 0 0 157 1~1 s 3 4 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 . TOTA L FOR: MJ\\BEL JR (i'\n65 57 184 195 ~{\\ 0 1 0 0 2 1 \u0026gt;Ic s\n?~k 017 BALE Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 2 6 2 14 24 2 I 0 0 0 0 49 02 2 5 4 18 18 0 0 1 0 0 47 03 2 4 3 15 17 0 1 0 0 0 0 40 04 2 4 5 17 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 05 2 8 10 20 13 0 0 0 0 53 06 2 2 20  14 0 0 1 0 0 0 39 E 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 KF 5 5 5 19 18 0 3 0 0 0 51 PK _9 1\u0026gt; 3 7 11 10 2 0 0 \" 0 \"-9/3. 5 fi1 TOT AL FOR: BALE \" 44 34 133 132,?li 4 5 9 1 0 0 1C\\ 362 018 BRADY Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 3 5 8 25 20 2 0 0 0 62 02 3 11 11 21 15 0 3 0 0 63 03 2 9 2 20 15 0 2 1 0 0 50 04 3 3 4 16 9 0 3 6 4 0 0 45 05 2 5 8 18 8 0 0 43 06 6 5 9 2 1 2 1 0 0 27 E 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 KF 3 5 9 19 20 0 2 0 0 0 56 LRSD Information Services Department 3 - Enrolled ~tude_~ts: 02-Oct-97 ---- PK 5 4 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 (\u0026gt; 0 \"\" 18 ~1 TOTALFOR:BRADY qi 50 48 134 101 ,.P 5 II 14 9 0 0 i' 372 -- -- - - --- - ----- BADGETT Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 2 I I 18 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 02 2 0 2 16 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 03 1 0 1 13 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 04 2 3 3 10 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 05 0 I 9 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 06 0 0 12 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 E 0 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 KF 2 4 15 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 PK 0 :, 2 11 ~'f 18 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 1) o '!J/7,-31 cp- 1 TOTALFOR:BADGETT '' 8 11 110 1041 0 0 0 0 0 0 233 MCDERMOT Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 5 24 13 19 14 2 0 0 0 74 02 3 13 11 22 22 0 1 0 0 71 03 2 12 19 28 13 0 0 0 0 0 73 04 2 20 10 19 18 0 2 0 0 71 05 3 13 10 23 21 0 0 0 0 1 69 06 3 10 7 19 27 0 0 2 0 0 0 65 KF 3 l( 14 10 13 15 ?\u0026gt;I 0 0 0 0 54 aJ7 TOTALFOR:MCDERMOT ~ 106 80 143 130,\" 5 3 5 4 0 1 ,i 477 021 CARVER Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 3 19 12 21 16 0 0 0 0 0 69 02 4 26 16 22 23 0 0 2 0 0 90 03 3 20 18 29 19 0 0 1 0 0 88 04 3 26 12 32 20 0 0 4 0 0 95 05 4 26 21 31 19 0 1 0 0 100 06 4 20 22 24 26 0 0 1 0 0 94 KF 3 A 16 10 9 21 :,,,0 0 2 2 0 0 60 ,~1- 0 TOT AL FOR: CARVER ~l, 153 111 168 144J' o 3 6 11 0 0 ~ 596 022 BASELINE Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 3 4 4 24 19 0 0 0 54 02 2 1 2 15 16 0 0 0 0 0 35 03 2 0 5 17 23 0 0 0 48 04 3 2 14 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 LRSDI nformationS ervicesD epartment 4 :AlEl nrolled Stud\nrrts: - ~-- '...----- TOT AL FOR: BASELINE OS 06 E KF PK 2 2 4 4 0 I 2 0 2 S ) 2: 'i3 2! 17 11 0 IS 12 I 2 4 0 17 28 0 11\n\u0026gt;..116 ~ 0 132 135~~ 3 I 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 02-Qcl-97 0 I 35 0 0 29 0 0 8 0 0 54 0 O O 777- 35 2 1Y323 023 FAIR PRK Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total TOTAL FOR: FAIR PRK 01 02 03 04 OS 06 KF PK 2 2 2 S 4 2 4 I 3 2 2 3 2 2 3 3 4 1 13 ,?~ 25 29 11 24 0 13 12 I 18 11 0 7 8 0 7 9 0 7 14 0 14 16 0 S ,1 12 0 82 106 {~ 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 44 0 30 0 34 0 20 0 21 0 27 0 36 0 .i/1.'/3. 6 0 ~ 248 024 FORST PK Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total TOT AL FOR: FORST PK 01 02 03 04 OS 06 KF 3 18 16 IS 13 0 3 22 3 17 3 16 2 11 2 12 3 16 if'\\ 112 17 19 19 IS 9 12 107 14 17 0 16 13 0 12 20 0 13 12 0 14 19 0 12 IS ~ 0 96 109 '\n/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 I 2 3 0 0 0 I 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 71 65 68 52 55 4~1 0 57 0 C., 430 025 FRANKLIN Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total TOT AL FOR: FRANKLIN 01 02 03 04 OS 06 E KF J\u0026gt;K ~ LRSD Information Services Department 3 4 3 4 2 2 4 0 2 1 2 4 30 31 2 30 27 0 30 24 23 19 0 0 0 0 1 14 18 0 0 0 11 24 0 2 I I 4 0 2 33 40 I 8 1\n. 4 24 ~, 34 (\\ 0 ?J' 17 14 206 221  2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 I 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 61 55 46 33 37 18 0 0 77 q\n/7 o~ofn 0 0 (, 464 5 W)Enrolled Stude~ts: --- 02-Oct-97 ----- - ---- -- --- 026 GARLAND Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 2 15 17 1 0 0 0 0 36 02 2 0 14 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 03 2 0 I 16 17 3 0 0 0 0 0 37 04 3 0 0 20 12 0 0 0 0 0 33 05 2 0 0 14 16 I 2 0 0 0 0 33 06 2 0 I 18 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 E 0 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 CjJ7o KF 2 0 14 18 I 0 0 0 0 0 34 PK 0 Q 0 11 it, 5 ~ 0 0 0 ~o t 18 TOTALFOR:GARLAND lJ 2 4 127 126-J\n7 4 0 0 01~71 027 GIBBS Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total OJ 2 13 9 11 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 02 2 11 9 II 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 03 2 12 6 14 9 2 I I 0 0 0 45 04 2 8 12 18 9 0 0 0 0 0 48 05 2 11 12 9 14 I I 0 0 0 0 48 06 2 14 7 11 JO 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 ~-\n7 KF 2 9 JO 10 JO 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 TOT AL FOR: GIBBS rf?\u0026gt;78 65 84 77 ,1.,\\ 4 2 1 0 0 o1 311 028 CHICOT Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total OJ 3 10 9 26 24 3 0 0 0 0 73 02 3 8 6 22 '.3I 4 4 0 0 0 0 75 03 4 8 6 25 26 5 2 0 0 0 73 04 4 8 8 27 22 3 0 0 0 0 0 68 05 3 5 7 24 24 2 0 0 0 0 63 06 3 12 4 27 22 2 3 0 0 0 71 E 4 2 7 6 0 0 I 0 0 0 20 (, ,,. KF 4 6 7 23 16 3 4 0 0 0 0 59 PK JO 11 7 II 1~ 7 0 0 0 0 0 D Q-6_/). 35 TOT AL FOR: CHICOT f,1 71 56 192 178 ~12' 2 15 3 0 0 0 ~() 537 029 WESTHIL Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total OJ 2 7 6 16 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 02 2 5 6 14 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 03 2 4 8 20 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 04 2 7 20 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 LRsD Information Services Department 6 -- -- :,\\II Enroll~ Students: 02-Oct-97 -- 05 2 9 7 16 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 06 2 8 12 12 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 7\u0026gt;1' KF 2 5 7 16 11 0 0 0 0 0 40 TOT AL FOR: WEST HIL q?'45 47 114 108 fi'o 0 0 0 0 315 JEFFRSN Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 3 14 15 14 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 02 3 26 19 17 11 0 0 0 0 0 74 03 3 24 15 18 15 0 I I 0 0 0 74 04 3 18 19 16 13 0 0 0 I 0 0 67 05 3 23 23 16 18 0 0 0 0 0 81 06 3 25 17 21 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 84 E 2 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 ~7 KF 4 21 17 13 5 ~I 0 0 0 0 58 TOT AL FOR: JEFFRSN ,\nf\"1 53 126 117 110~ 1 1 3 1 1 0 1 513 CLOVREL Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 4 3 5 43 35 I 2 0 0 0 0 89 02 3 3 32 37 0 0 0 0 0 74 03 3 2 I 40 24 0 0 0 0 0 68 04 2 l 2 25 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 05 2 3 2 27 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 06 1 2 0 21 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 KF 4 0 4 31 35 1 0 0 0 0 72 1'f7' PK 4~ 12,: 17 ~ 0 2 0 0 0 0 t/7, 36 TOT AL FOR: CLOVR EL ~ 18 16 231 2384t\n2 7 0 0 0 0 11 512 032 DODD Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 3 10 5 14 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 35 02 3 5 5 11 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 03 I 3 11 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 04 2 4 7 11 II 1 0 0 0 0 35 05 2 5 11 13 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 06 2 4 7 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 E 3 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 ~~7~ KF 2 -rl 6 3 4 9 ~I 0 0 0 0 0 23 TOT AL FOR: DODD 36 38 78 67 ,~ 4 0 0 0 0 ~ 224 033 MEADCLIF Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 3 5 7 23 21 0 0 0 0 58 LRSD Information Services Department 7 ---- -- - -- -!t\\1E1n ~lled ~tudents: 02-Oct-97 --- 02 3 7 4 26 17 0 0 1 0 1 0 56 03 2 2 2 23 18 0 0 0 1 0 47 04 2 3 2 22 17 0 1 0 0 0 0 45 05 2 5 3 13 17 0 0 0 0 40 06 2 5 4 20 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 fl1\" KF 2 6 4 16 13 ~o 0 0 0 0 40 TOT AL FOR: MEADCLIF ft. 33 26 143 120 '?Ju I 4 2 0 3 0 10 332 MITCHELL Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 2 1 17 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 02 2 0 17 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 03 3 1 0 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 04 2 0 0 13 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 05 2 2 0 10 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 06 2 0 2 12 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 E 0 0 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 KF 2 1 2 19 12 1 1 0 0 0 37 q-:,7o PK 2 .s 3 5 /3 8 0 0 0 0 0 _o 0 7.:1NJ8 TOT AL FOR: MITCHELL 8 8 114 109~1 I 0 0 0 I 3, 242 035 ML KING Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total OJ 5 31 22 30 35 I 0 0 0 0 0 119 02 4 20 21 20 25 0 0 0 I 0 0 87 03 3 13 25 26 21 0 0 0 0 0 86 04 3 16 15 21 19 0 2 2 0 0 76 05 3 15 13 29 16 I 0 4 I 0 80 06 2 14 JO IO 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 KF 5 20 17 31 23 0 0 0 0 0 92 ~~7 .. p (\\ 16 .3!:i 19 20 .3~75 ~ 0 0 0 I O I 0 '171 TOT AL FOR: M L KING ~\"6 145 142 187 167p 3  3 9 1 0 11 6-58 036 ROCKFELR Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total OJ 3 13 9 13 18 0 I 0 0 0 55 02 3 8 7 15 19 0 0 I 0 0 SI 03 3 12 7 21 II 0 0 0 0 53 04 3 9 4 13 24 I 0 0 0 0 52 05 2 8 8 15 12 3 2 0 0 0 0 48 06 2 9 8 13 9 0 I 0 0 0 0 40 KF 4 II 9 15 16 0 0 0 0 53 PK 21 \"'-524 21 S-P29 0 0 O~l,,98 LRSD Information Services Department 8 A.II Enrolled Students: - l,~ 02-Oct-97 B11\u0026gt; 1u1 91 0 ,~ TOTALFOR:ROCKFELR 76 126 138 /i 9 7 2 0 50 --- -- 037 GEYER SP Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total ---- - 01 2 5 5 17 15 2 0 0 1 0 0 45 02 2 1 7 12 22 0 2 0 0 0 0 44 03 2 3 3 14 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 04 2 6 2 13 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 05 1 1 3 10 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 25 06 2 2 7 22 6 0 I 0 0 0 0 38 7~7 KF 2 6 4 18 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 PK Lt' 7 ri 7 8 ,~ 10 :, 1 0 0~ 0.51~ 35 TOTAL FOR: GEYER SP 31 38 114 123 ?-1 4 4 0 0 JO 316 038 PULHTE Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 3 8 15 29 20 0 1 0 1 0 0 74 02 3 14 11 14 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 03 4 18 14 18 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 04 3 22 20 22 12 2 0 0 0 0 79 05 2 18 13 22 25 0 0 0 0 0 79 06 2 10 16 17 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 ${\n~ KF 2 ~10 13 8 7~0 1 I 0 0 0 40 TOT AL FOR: PUL HT E '/' 100 102 130 124 2 2 3 1 0 0 \u0026lt;t 464 039 RIGHTSEL Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 2 0 15 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 02 2 0 0 20 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 03 2 0 1 11 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 04 0 0 6 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 05 2 0 20 16 1 1 0 0 0 0 39 06 2 0 0 19 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 KF 2 0 0 13 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 PK 5 3 2 ~ 7 0 0 0 0 0 ,So~ 18 q-\u0026gt;f'I TOT AL FOR: RIGHTSEL ,-:/1 5 106 128,-~ 1 1 0 1 0 0 ~ 249 040 ROMINE Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 3 5 6 20 13 1 0 0 0 0 46 02 2 6 5 14 12 I 2 0 0 0 41 03 2 7 2 15 11 3 0 I 0 0 40 04 3 5 4 8 12 0 2 0 0 0 0 31 05 2 5 7 9 6 2 0 0 0 0 30 LRSD Information Services Department 9 All Enrolled Students: 02-Ocr-97 - -- - 06 6 4 7 7 2 2 0 0 0 0 28 E 2 I 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 KF 4 9 2 25 18 4 3 0 0 0 62 PK 6 I 8 7 /'! 11 0 0 I 2 0 -'/ I 50736 iJi TOT AL FOR: ROMINE op 51 39 114 92g'~l3 12 3 3 0 lj~\nJ ~ D 042 WASHNGTN Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 6 14 18 22 26 3 4 I 0 0 89 02 4 17 12 31 25 4 2 I 0 0 0 92 03 4 17 17 25 26 4 0 0 2 0 0 91 04 2 19 8 19 16 I 0 2 I 0 67 05 3 26 12 27 10 5 2 0 0 84 06 4 18 27 20 19 I 2 2 3 0 0 92 i E I 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 ~~/0 KF 4 12 8 30 22 4 4 2 0 1 0 83 _pK 1 8 ,\" 12 15.2.112 I 2 2 O Go 0 Ii, 53 TOTALFOR:WASHNGTN ~ 132 115 195 157~3 16 9 11 2 0 t,) 6.6,0. ., 043 WILLIAMS Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 3 14 17 16 19 0 0 0 69 02 3 17 14 16 20 0 0 0 0 69- 03 3 12 18 17 18 0 0 2 0 I 0 68 04 3 13 21 17 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 05 3 18 17 18 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 06 3 14 16 24 13 0 0 0 0 ~ ~i 69 KF 3 15 13 15 15 t 0 l 0 0 60 TOT AL FOR: WILLIAMS ~11103 116 123 125~ 0 0 5 4 1 2 / ~79 044 WILSON Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 4 3 26 14 0 2 0 0 0 0 46 02 2 3 17 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 03 3 2 4 14 25 2 0 0 0 0 l 48 04 2 4 6 23 16 l 0 0 0 0 51 05 2 3 3 18 15 0 0 0 0 0 40 06 2 5 2 19 14 0 0 0 0 0 41 E 2 0 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 i~r KF 3 0 6 32 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 54 PK 3 1 5 5 C, 4 I 0 0 0 0 0 50]- 18 TOT AL FOR: WILSON ~:?,25 28 170 127~,, 7 4 0 0 0 J ,\n, 362 LRSD Information Services Department IO . . 02-Oct-97 ---- ---- -- - - -- WOODRUFF Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 2 2 8 14 13 0 0 0 0 0 38 02 2 2 7 14 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 03 2 4 7 24 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 04 2 I 2 20 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 OS 2 6 3 17 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 06 I 6 2 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 KF 2 6 10 5 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 7/~ PK 6 ,~ 9 10 ii 8 1 0 0 0 0 I 0 ~37. .3 4 TOT AL FOR: WOODRUFF ~\\ 33 48 111 90\n/ ' 1 0 0 0 0 d\" 284 046 MABEL EL Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 6 13 6 26 24 2 0 0 0 0 72 02 4 10 4 32 14 I 0 0 0 0 62 03 3 9 5 20 21 1 0 0 0 0 0 56 04 4 4 22 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 05 4 6 19 20 I 0 0 0 0 0 so 06 6 4 12 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 E 0 0 3 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 KF 3 8 9 19 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 54 PK q 3 1 4 3 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 \u0026lt;)~~ 16 117-- TOT AL FOR: MABEL EL q 57 42 156 143j-C\\ 7 2 0 0 0 0 ~ 407 047 TERRY Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 4 22 19 22 20 0 0 0 3 0 0 86 02 3 25 22 13 11 0 0 2 0 0 74 03 3 20 17 14 18 0 0 0 0 0 1 70 04 3 12 16 11 17 0 0 I 0 0 58 OS 3 25 15 IS 19 0 3 0 0 79 06 3 15 14 19 19 0 0 0 2 0 0 69 1t/f., KF 4\n\" 17 14 22 15 91 I 4 0 0 75 TOT AL FOR: TERRY 7 136 117 116 119(1' 1 3 5 13 0 l ~3511 048 FULBRIGH Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total 01 5 16 26 16 23 0 1 I 0 0 0 83 02 3 10 25 22 8 I 0 0 0 0 0 66 03 3 17 24 19 9 0 0 0 0 71 04 3 18 18 17 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 OS 4 II 16 24 14 0 0 0 0 0 66 LRSD Information Services Department 11 -(\n) 0 -f /2 ~~l -::Pt-\u0026lt;~.,.,,(\"::\u0026gt; ~~5 .,/to ~1 7~/c\n~/ ?o ---1-i ~~,\ni_ /\n-0/ o/..3 /\n~7~ 6'-Y\no _t,,J~ //, -4(,ND I --vO 0 ..1// 9i)a ~ . /7~. /.7/1 19~7 /0~ 5~ I I... ~j ~ \"\\\\ (1'\nt~, ~,\n, 8, 'ti/ ~.r)\n~le,~ J -?, t/J.\n)p f/\nJ.Y ~~D 7? ~~7(~ 7~~ l,11JI J.c~O 1 30~ '10l -i/\n~~/ /19..80 ~ ~ /~cr:x) 70 c) \u0026amp; - -0 - /2 ------7 1/JIJ t~// c5, ?(Y~ $? I .:\n5:../ 6 7c7,,, /: /t I~ !\n?? 3,/f./ /a:J-/ ~\n21/ t\n7\n! ~( 3 //D 7, ~,_:\n.., .::?c-1 /qc::\n_J r\n,[{lo l\"c:,_ I -------------------------------------- AlEl nrolled Students~- ---- - 06 E KF TOTAL FOR: FULBRIGH --------- 2 16 3 4 _J1 14 16 12 0 17 23 F 10s 142 134 19 0 0 0 14 po 106\nr 1 0 0 0 I 0 0 4 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 02-Oct-97 0 64 0 4 0 69 0 ~ 495 050 OTTERCR Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total TOT AL FOR: OTTER CR 01 02 03 04 05 06 KF 2 13 2 18 2 12 2 14 2 15 2 7 2 ~ 6 ,u 85 9 17 14 12 15 9 13 11 83 7 17 14 10 12 10 87 8 0 8 0 8 I 9 0 14 0 9 0 8 0 64 ,~, 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 I 3 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 47 49 50 54 49 43 ,\n.//, 1 36 1 ~ 328 051 WAKEFIEL Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total TOTAL FOR: WAKEFIEL 01 02 03 04 05 06 KF 3 3 2 2 3 8 2 I 2 2 3 4 I 3 .1\\ ..\u0026gt;\\ 21 4 22 3 23 3 25 0 18 3. 26 6 20 I 25 20 159 19 0 15 0 31 I 26 0 15 2 35 I 22 ')\"2 163~9 6 0 0 I 0 0 I 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 43 0 70 0 45 0 0 66 0 52 0 ,o 373 052 WATSON Grade Classes WM WF BM BF HM HF AM AF IM IF Total TOT AL FOR: WATSON 01 02 03 04 05 06 KF ffi( LRSD nformation Services Department [\n/u? .\n,,,c ., ~/ 4 4 2 2 2 3 4 3 3 I 3 2 I 43 40 I 2 3 32 26 7 2 2 31 24 32 21 I 0 23 18 I 4 4 33 20 0 6 3 32 32 0 lt O ~ 2 20 31 14 0 ~ 22 24 238 203 )\\~ 4 0 /0 0 (\n. 9, ~ f-:.::\u0026gt;-' Z .:?f\n)..., /~tt:.wi/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 65 0 72 0 50 0 46 (? 1 '/Q 0 61 \"l:\u0026gt; 0 73 0 CJ\"{J3~6 0 /., 493 :::?:,. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1993 BUILDING CAPACITIES SCHOOL CAPACITY sr\nNIQR HTQH S~HQ.Q. LS CENTRAL 1891 JA FAIR 954 HALL 1291 MCCLELLAN 1199 PARKVIEW 1000 METROPOLITAN N/A SUBTOTAL: 6335 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS CLOVERDALE 868 DUNBAR 812 FOREST HEIGHTS 858 HENDERSON 907 MABLEVALE 614. MANN 850 PULASKI HEIGHTS 745 SOUTHWEST 737 SUBTOTAL: 6391 ~L~~l:!TARY SCHOOLS \\q BADGET 257\n~BALE 401 J?BASELINE 390 UBOOKER 656 \\~BRADY 467 :\"\n-I1 CARVER 613 JqcmcoT 558 3 , CLOVERDALE 492 J' DODD 328 /\\~,,_F,A IR PARK 351 j CREST PARK 399 ~ 'o FRANKLIN 544 ~i FULBRIGHT 5-4-0 ------ - ..._ ........... .  . ~--.c._~#...-.-.c.,,-:..\n~ . . _..,.,_~---- ..,  1\": !.  Note #1 Note #1 Note #2\nPLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT  E, .. ?U~nQT,AND 31 346 GEYER SPRINGS 328 J-1GIBBS 4 9 ISH (CLOSED) 353 0 33~ --J EFFERSON 492 ING 692 t-tL~MABLEVALE 515\nlo MCDERMOTT 517 33HEADOWCLIFF 465 3-/MITCHEL 346 s-r\noTTER CREEK 351 Ji PULASKI HEIGHTS 374 3C?R IGHTSELL 346 3\u0026amp;, ROCKEFELLER 425 ,H}, ROMINE :tf/ STEPHENS 487 298 4JTERRY 515 51 WAKEFIELD 492 tf\n\u0026gt;WASHlNGTON 939 J\n}-WATSON a -t-i 492 WESTERN HILLS 328 ~ WILLIAMS 517 WILSON 394 45'WOODRUFF 324 SUBTOTAL: 16,332 Notes: Notes reflect changes from p::-eviously established capacities. Note #1: Capacities established 1992 submitted to Federal Court. Note #2: Capacity change from 1992 Desegregation Plan due to additional portable building added. ~ Note #2 Note #2 Note #2 j / F.YI. Date: /..x-.5, -9 7 ar'pm  Gene o Horace rn/ Margie D Melissa fil\"' Skip a,/ Polly IY Linda Return to: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION [OOL DISTRICT, ET AL. LR-C-82-866 SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT RECEIVED iHUA, ET AL. iT, ET AL. 1997 OFFIOCFE PLAINTIFF LRSD' s AMi~~Tro MONITORING PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS INT ERVENO RS INTERVENORS ERVENORS' FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS r OF DOCUMENTS REGARDING LRSD'S MOTION FOR APPROVAL E REVISED DESEGREGATION AND EDUCATION PLAN Little Rock School District ( \"LRSD\") for its Answers t Intervenors' First Set of Interrogatories and reduction of Documents states: TORY NO. 1: Please state the name, title, address and telephone number of each and every individual assisting in the preparation of the answers to these interrogatories. ANSWER: Objection. This interrogatory requests information which is privileged under the work product doctrine and/or the attorney-client privilege. Without waiving this objection, LRSD states that the following persons assisted in the preparation of these answers: Dr. Les Carnine, Christopher Heller and John C. Fendley, Jr. INTERROGATORY NO. 2: In 15 instances in paragraphs II. B. through II. P. of the proposed new plan, the words \"LRSD shall implement programs policies and/or procedures\" followed by a particular subject matter appear. Please identify separately for f:lhomo\\kndlcyllnd'dao-jooh.- CORRECTECDO PY1 0/01/97 LRSD ENROU.MFtH on ICl,4Lo c I Ollf:R I, 199i COi.ii~I HIGH SCHOOLS l-1 rl9_7 w  o I TOlAL 13/ BLK 9E.~!_R(IL_ __ ,,_-_ 1'101~ 7Y5 49 _- .tii~f--=-~9% FAIR I 612 137 8  7511 81% l~ALL 11 - 561 I 179 50 1'117001-it% MCCIf :LLAN. - -j! -.7 9(}! - 121 - 24 ~ --935 - 843/o PARK'IEW 464 403 - 44  - 911~51% ALE SR HIGH , 61 0 0 6 100% s_u_~!OTA_L_ ---3534 154~ .JI~---i~1 __ .?I~ JUNIORH IGHS- '- - ---t--.+ - CLOVERDALE 552  36 34J::: 622 ~% DuIJsAR I 442 ,82 47 1 - nil 57% FORESTI I EIGHTS. - 452 - 170 ---18 / - ij.joJ 70% HENDERSON -, 624 83 -ff-:_:- 1ffi- 86% MABELVALE 380 1'19 7 5o5 506 75% MANN I 446 375 37  858 52% PULASKHI EIGHTS 4371 315 15 767 57% SOUTHWEST I 426 651 19  510 83% ALE JR. HIGH 10 0 01 10~-100% SliafoTAL 1 3769 1453 194 5416 69% - ----------!!- - . I --- l - -- -- et.F.MENTARY-  ----'- 1 -~1'--- BADGEIr 214 19. -- or:- 233-- 92% BALE ---, ~ 2 6 6 '5 7 1 7 38 1 26 - 362 73% BASELINE 18 v 323 83% BOOKER 11 308 2611 28  597 52% BRADY I 235 94 43 v 372 63% CARVER-----, 312 259 25 - 59~i CHICOT 370 121 46 - 537 69% CLOVERDALE ,,::_-469~ 30 -- . 13 V . Yl~ Jl2% DOUD 145 74 5 , 2241 65% FftJRPARK I 188 50 10 , 248 76% FOHESTP ARK 205 219 6 - 430 48% FRANKLIN ~--427 24 13 V 464 --927, FULBRIGITI ---240 -- 246 ___ l :-- 495- 43% GARLAND 1 253 3 15 - 271 93% GEYER SPRINGS 2371 66 13 316 75% GIBBS 161 133 17 - 311 52% JEFFERSON -- 227 2/9 7 ...,. 513 44% KING 354 279 25 - 658 --54~-\n- MABELVALE-- '- 299 __ 92 -- 161  - 407 - 73% MCDERMOTT 273 181 23 - 4 77 57% MEAOOWCLiFF 2_~ _ 57, 12 - 332 79% MITCHELL 223 91 10  242 92% OTTER CREEK '151 167 1of, -m 46% PULASKHI EIGHTS 254 - 193. ... 17 - 464 55% RIGHTSELL 234 9 6 - 249 94% ROCKEFELLER -~ 153 33 450 59% ROMINE 206 78 44 ~ 328 63% TERRY 7.35 243 33 -:: ..... 511 46% WAKEFIELD 322 ~2 -- im-373 86% WASHINGTON 352 2!~ --- 95 :: 660 53% WATSON 441 40 12  49:J U9% WESTERNH ILLS 222 91 21 315 ~ wILuAMs 24a rn ___ Jzl. 479 ~ WILSON 297 53 12  362 8?.% wo65RiJFF- '--201-----:,s -o-=--784---fi SUBT OTAL. 9362 4166 -688 14216- 65% I GRANDT OTAL 16665! 7164 1057 24886 67% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Amboy Elementary School 6002-050 K-05  White Black Hispanic Asian/Pl Grade Totals M F M F M F M F K 52 14 8 15 15 0 0 0 0 01 68 20 6 10 29 2 0 0 1 02 78 19 16 20 21 2 0 0 0 03 68 18 13 22 15 0 0 0 0 04 71 21 15 13 22 0 0 0 0 05 63 13 20 .\".I. 12 17 .I 1 0 0 0 Totals 400 105 78 1 \" 92 119~ 5 0 0 1 Percentages 26.3% 19.5% 23.0% 29.8% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 45.8% 52.8% ~~io 1.3% 0.3% Grades 1-5 348 91 70 77 104 5 0 0 1 Percentages 26.1% 20.1% 22.1% 29.9% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 46.3% 52.0% 1.4% 0.3% Aml/Als M F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J 0 0 ~ 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% NOV2 l 1997 OFFOICFE DESEGREMGAmTJIITOONR ING North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Belwood Elementary School 6002-053 K-05 White Black Hispanic Asian/PI Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F K 19 2 8 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 35 8 8 11 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 02 20 5 1 4 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 03 23 5 2 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 18 4 2 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 25 4 7 8 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 6 3 0 _Q 2 1 ,,..,\u0026amp;.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 \"'\\... Totals 146 31 28.., 46 39\" 0 2 0 0 0 0 - Percentages 21.2% 19.2% 31.5% 26.7% 0.0% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 40.4% 58.2% 6Y\u0026gt;7 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% Grades 1-5 127 29 20 39 37 0 2 0 0 0 0 Percentages 22.8% 15.7% 30.7% 29.1% 0.0% 1.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 38.6% 59.8% 1.6% 0.0% 0.0% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Boone Park Elementary School 6002-054 J-05 White Black Hispanic Asian/PI Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F - M F M F M F  J 35 0 2 / 17 15 r 1 0 0 0 0 0 K 71 4 3 34 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 83 4 8 30 40 0 1 0 0 0 0 02 58 5 0 28 22 3 0 0 0 0 0 03 60 5 4 33 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 69 4 4 35 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 59 5 2 - 31 20 -t 0 1 0 0 0 0 /_ Totals 435 27 23\" 208 171-'' 4 2 0 0 0 0 ~ Percentages 6.2% 5.3% 47.8% 39.3% 0.9% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.5% 87.1% i1J. 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% Grades 1-5 329 23 18 157 126 3 2 0 0 0 0 Percentages 7.0% 5.5% 47.7% 38.3% 0.9% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.5% 86.0% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Crestwood Elementary School 6002-055 K-05 White Black Hispanic Asian/Pl Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F K 44 12 17 8 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 51 11 17 13 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 51 11 13 13 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 39 12 12 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 49 12 19 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 31 11 8 ~, 5 6 _c 0 1 0 0 0 0 I Totals 265 69 86 ,., 59 50 ,- 0 1 0 0 0 0 Percentages 26.0% 32.5% 22.3% 18.9% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 58.5% 41.1% \u0026gt;J7I . 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% Grades 1-5 221 57 69 51 43 0 1 0 0 0 0 Percentages 25.8% 31.2% 23.1% 19.5% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 57.0% 42.5% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Glenview Elementary School 6002-056 K-05 White Black Hispanic Asian/Pl Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F K 25 1 1 17 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 31 3 3 12 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 22 2 2 8 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 24 2 5 11 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 22 1 1 9 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 34 4 5 -ri 12 13 ,..,,1 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Totals 158 13 17' 69 59 \" 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Percentages 8.2% 10.8% 43.7% 37.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 19.0% 81.0% %17  0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Grades 1-5 133 12 16 52 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percentages 9.0% 12.0% 39.1% 39.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 21.1% 78.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Indian Hills Elementarv School 6002-057 K-05 White Black Hispanic Asian/PI Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F K 63 19 23 10 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 76 17 17 14 26 1 0 0 0 1 0 02 80 20 16 20 19 1 1 0 3 0 0 03 61 11 13 19 17 1 0 0 0 0 0 04 64 11 11 20 20 0 1 1 0 0 0 05 50 14 7 -' 11 18 _,.,, 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,r,. Totals 394 92 87,, 94 Iller 3 2 1 3 1 0 Percentages 23.4% 22.1% 23.9% 28.2% 0.8% 0.5% 0.3% 0.8% 0.3% 0.0% 45.4% 52.0% a--]. 1.3% 1.0% 0.3% Grades 1-5 331 73 64 84 100 3 2 1 3 1 0 Percentages 22.1% 19.3% 25.4% 30.2% 0.9% 0.6% 0.3% 0.9% 0.3% 0.0% 41.4% 55.6% 1.5% 1.2% 0.3% North Little Rock Public Schools October l, 1997 Lakewood Elementarv School 6002-058 K-05 White Black Hispanic Asian/PI Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F K 26 8 5 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 39 7 10 12 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 39 7 8 13 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 41 11 8 13 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 36 10 4 11 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 37 8 8 ~ 11 10 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 II\" Totals 218 51 43 '' 66 58 1v 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percentages 23.4% 19.7% 30.3% 26.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 43.1% 56.9% j77-\u0026gt; 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Grades l-5 192 43 38 60 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percentages 22.4% 19.8% 31.3% 26.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 42.2% 57.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Lynch Drive Elementary School 6002-060 K-05 White Black Hispanic Asian/PI Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F K 66 9 19 18 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 58 3 8 24 22 0 1 0 0 0 0 02 73 11 9 26 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 71 13 7 27 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 75 10 12 29 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 60 8 12 ...\\. . 21 19 \"' 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Totals 403 54 67 I\" 145 136,::, 0 1 0 0 0 0 Percentages 13.4% 16.6% 36.0% 33.7% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 30.0% 69.7% 10? 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% Grades 1-5 337 45 48 127 116 0 1 0 0 0 0 Percentages 13.4% 14.2% 37.7% 34.4% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 27.6% 72.1% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Meadow Park Elementary School 6002-061 K-05 White Black Hispanic Asian/PI Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F K 23 3 8 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 21 4 2 8 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 34 3 7 9 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 40 2 8 14 14 0 0 1 1 0 0 04 34 5 8 11 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 25 7 2 _o 9 7 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,'!!I, Totals 177 24 35 ~ 60 56 I 0 0 1 1 - 0 0 Percentages 13.6% 19.8% 33.9% 31.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 65.5% (,~\n. 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% Grades 1-5 154 21 27 51 53 0 0 1 1 0 0 Percentages 13.6% 17.5% 33.1% 34.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 31.2% 67.5% 0.0% 1.3% 0.0% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1 997 North Heii hts Elementary School 6002-063 K-05 White Black Hispanic Asian/PI Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F K 72 20 22 10 16 3 0 1 0 0 0 01 90 22 18 18 25 3 4 0 0 0 0 02 71 13 18 24 10 3 3 0 0 0 0 03 75 22 10 22 16 3 2 0 0 0 0 04 81 18 18 18 18 5 4 0 0 0 0 05 84 15 26 .. ..~\n19 17 .. 3 4 0 0 0 0 4V Totals 473 110 112\"' 111 102 \u0026lt;II\" 20 17 1 0 0 0 , Percentages 23.3% 23.7% 23.5% 21.6% 4.2% 3.6% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 46.9% 45.0% ~7- 7.8% 0.2% 0.0% Grades 1-5 401 90 90 101 86 17 17 0 0 0 0 Percentages 22.4% 22.4% 25.2% 21.4% 4.2% 4.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 44.9% 46.6% 8.5% 0.0% 0.0% North Little Rock Public Schools October I, 1997 Park Hill Elementary School 6002-064 K-05 White Black Hispanic Asian/Pl Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F K 40 10 13 9 7 0 I 0 0 0 0 01 44 10 10 17 6 0 I 0 0 0 0 02 43 9 12 12 9 0 I 0 0 0 0 03 41 14 7 13 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 40 10 6 13 10 0 0 0 0 0 I 05 37 11 7 ,,q 7 11 _, 0 0 0 0 1 0 ~ Totals 245 64 55 I 71 50 '\" 0 3 0 0 1 1 - Percentages 26.1% 22.4% 29.0% 20.4% 0.0% 1.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.4% 48.6% 49.4% ..-/~1-1.2% 0.0% 0.8% Grades 1-5 205 54 42 62 43 0 2 0 0 1 I Percentages 26.3% 20.5% 30.2% 21.0% 0.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 0.5% 46.8% 51.2% 1.0% 0.0% 1.0% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Pike View Elementary School 6002-065 K-05 White Black Hispanic Asian/Pl Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F K 61 12 10 19 18 0 1 1 0 0 0 01 71 16 11 23 18 1 0 1 1 0 0 02 67 14 14 24 14 0 0 0 1 0 0 03 49 14 11 8 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 42 12 9 8 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 05 46 11 15 .,.i.' 11 8 ,,.,C 1 0 0 0 0 0 ,, Totals 336 79 70 I 93 86 I 2 1 3 2 0 0 ... Percentages 23.5% 20.8% 27.7% 25.6% 0.6% 0.3% 0.9% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 44.3% 53.3% S37 0.9% 1.5% 0.0% Grades 1-5 275 67 60 74 68 2 0 2 2 0 0 Percentages 24.4% 21.8% 26.9% 24.7% 0.7% 0.0% 0.7% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 46.2% 51.6% 0.7% 1.5% 0.0% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Redwood Pre-School 6002-067 J-K White Black Hispanic Asian/Pl Ami/Ats Grade Totals M F ., M Fm~.. M F M F M F .... J 108 5 6 ,, 52 43. 1 1 0 0 0 0 .., K 27 0 0 14 13 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Totals 135 5 6 II 66 56 lrT 1 1 0 0 0 0 C7 Percentages 3.7% 4.4% 48.9% 41.5% 0.7% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 8.1% 90.4% 107. 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% Grades 1-5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percentages 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Seventh Street Elementary School 6002-069 K-05 White Black Hispanic Asian/Pl Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F K 90 8 5 39 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 46 6 4 15 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 70 6 6 24 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 70 10 13 30 16 0 0 1 0 0 0 04 56 15 16 10 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 48 7 16 J' ~ 13 12 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 I Totals 380 52 60 n- 131 136,. 0 0 1 0 0 0 Percentages 13.7% 15.8% 34.5% 35.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 29.5% 70.3% 707. 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% Grades 1-5 290 44 55 92 98 0 0 1 0 0 0 Percentages 15.2% 19.0% 31.7% 33.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 34.1% 65.5% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 TOTAL ELEMENTARY White - Black .n Hispanic Asian/Pl Aml/Als Grade Totals M F ~ ,7 M F ..,,\" M F M F M F ,,-: Totals 4165 776 767 1 - 1311 1229\" 35 30 7 7 2 1 ~ Percentages 18.6% 18.4% 31.5% 29.5% 0.8% 0.7% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 37.0% 61.0% ~I 7. 1.6% 0.3% 0.1% Grade 1-5 3343 649 617 1027 978 30 27 5 7 2 1 Percentages 19.4% 18.5% 30.7% 29.3% 0.9% 0.8% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 37.9% 60.0% 1.7% 0.4% 0.1% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Central Sixth Grade School 6002-059 06-06 White Black Hispanic Asian/PI Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F 06 664 152 140 .c i)I 178 185 ,, 3 4 1 0 0 1 ,., Totals 664 152 140\n 178 185~- 3 4 1 0 0 l ., Percentages 22.9% 21.1% 26.8% 27.9% 0.5% 0.6% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 44.0% 54.7% .s5r 1.1% 0.2% 0.2% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Lakewood Middle School 6002-070 07-08 White Black Hispanic Asian/Pl Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F 07 264 73 78 58 50 3 1 0 1 0 0 08 268 84 69 I 56 52 ' ~ 1 2 1 2 0 1 - Totals 532 157 147 }\" 114 10211' 4 3 1 3 0 1 I\" Percentages 29.5% 27.6% 21.4% 19.2% 0.8% 0.6% 0.2% o.6% 0.0% 0.2% 57.1% 40.6% .\u0026gt;/11  1.3% 0.8% 0.2% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Ridgeroad Middle School 6002-072 07-08 White Black Hispanic Asian/Pl Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F 07 354 69 52 112 115 2 4 0 0 0 0 08 300 54 57 ~89 88 .I j 3 8 0 0 0 1 ,(/ Totals 654 123 109~ 201 203 ., 5 12 0 0 0 1 J w Percentages 18.8% 16.7% 30.7% 31.0% 0.8% 1.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 35.5% 61.8% t,?-1 2.6% 0.0% 0.2% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Rose City Middle School 6002-077 07-08 White Black Hispanic Asian/PI Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F 07 195 38 34 59 63 1 0 0 0 0 0 08 142 25 25 43 46 1 0 1 1 0 0 09 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 4 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 2 0 0 ,cl 2 0 f, 0 0 0 0 0 0 J Totals 347 64 61 1, 107 1110' 2 0 1 1 0 0 ,, Percentages 18.4% 17.6% 30.8% 32.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 36.0% 62.8% (i$7, 0.6% 0.6% 0.0% ' North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 North Little Rock High School-East Campus 6002-075 09-10 White Black Hispanic Asian/PI Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F 09 690 192 150 155 183 5 3 1 1 0 0 10 675 158 127 vt 180 197 6 5 1 0 0 1 -\" Totals 1365 350 277 (,o 335 380 ,  11 8 2 1 0 1 (7 Percentages 25.6% 20.3% 24.5% 27.8% 0.8% 0.6% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 45.9% 52.4% ~~7 1.4% 0.2% 0.1% North Little Rock Public Schools October I, 1997 North Little Rock High School-West Campus 6002-076 09-12 White Black Hispanic Asian/Pl Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F 09 53 7 1 26 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 10 114 24 8 47 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 612 164 148 123 164 2 6 2 3 0 0 12 525 144 125 -::\\: 114 124 ,:\n~ 7 5 2 4 0 0 - '3 Totals 1304 339 282 IT 310 340\" 11 11 4 7 0 0~ I Percentages 26.0% 21.6% 23.8% 26.1% 0.8% 0.8% 0.3% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 47.6% 49.8% :\n,\nJ/ o 1.7% 0.8% 0.0% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 Argenta Academy 6002-076 06-12 White Black Hispanic Asian/Pl Aml/Als Grade Totals M F M F M F M F M F 06 9 3 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 07 7 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08 15 3 1 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 09 25 8 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 48 9 2 21 14 1 1 0 0 0 0 11 35 4 3 15 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 22 3 2 I 9 7 ' 0 1 0 0 0 0 I Totals 161 31 10 'T' 78 38 \"\"' 2 2 0 0 0 0 I Percentages 19.3% 6.2% 48.4% 23.6% 1.2% 1.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.5% 72.0% 7'\u0026gt;} 2.5% 0.0% 0.0% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 TOTAL DISTRICT White ,_ Black ,J Hispanic Asian/Pl Aml/Als Grade Totals M F,11 i ... M F e:,. , M F M F M F .\u0026lt;I) . Totals 9192 1992 1793' 2634 2588' 73 70 16 19 2 5 ,~ Percentages 21.7% 19.5% 28.7% 28.2% 0.8% 0.8% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 41.2% 56.8% 67? 1.6% 0.4% 0.1% Grade 1-5 8370 1865 1643 2350 2337 68 67 14 19 2 5 Percentages 22.3% 19.6% 28.1% 27.9% 0.8% 0.8% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 41.9% 56.0% 1.6% 0.4% 0.1% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 TOTAL SECONDARY White .l\"V Black .. -Y Hispanic Asian/PI Arnl/Als Grade Totals M F ~M M F 'l.l '!\u0026gt;\" M F M F M F ,D Totals 5027 1216 1026\" 1323 1359 38 40 9 12 0 4 Percentages 24.2% 20.4% 26.3% 27.0% 0.8% 0.8% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 44.6% 53.4% -5l7- 1.6% 0.4% 0.1% North Little Rock Public Schools October 1, 1997 SUMMARY BY GRADE White Black Hispanic Asian/Pl Aml/Als Grade Totals M F ~ M F.,.( M F M F M F 2 Pre-School 143 5 8 ,, 69 58 \"' 2 1 0 0 0 0 - 3.5% 5.6% 48.3% 40.6% 1.4% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 9.1% 88.8% ~,. 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% Kindergarten 679 122 142 215 193 3 2 2 0 0 0 18.0% 20.9% 31.7% 28.4% 0.4% 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 38.9% 60.1% 0.7% 0.3% 0.0% 01 713 131 122 207 234 7 8 1 2 1 0 19.3% 18.0% 30.5% 34.5% 1.0% 1.2% 0.1% 0.3% 0.1% 0.0% 37.3% 64.9% 2.2% 0.4% 0.1% 02 706 125 122 225 215 9 6 0 4 0 0 17.7% 17.3% 31.9% 30.5% 1.3% 0.8% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 35.0% 62.3% 2.1% 0.6% 0.0% 03 662 139 113 231 170 4 2 2 1 0 0 21.0% 17.1% 34.9% 25.7% 0.6% 0.3% 0.3% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 38.1% 60.6% 0.9% 0.5% 0.0% 04 657 133 125 192 194 5 5 2 0 0 1 20.2% 19.0% 29.2% 29.5% 0.8% 0.8% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 39.3% 58.8% 1.5% 0.3% 0.2% 05 599 118 135 170 164 5 6 0 0 1 0 19.7% 22.5% 28.4% 27.4% 0.8% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 42.2% 55.8% 1.8% 0.0% 0.2% 06 679 158 140 184 187 4 4 1 0 0 1 23.3% 20.6% 27.1% 27.5% 0.6% 0.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 43.9% 54.6% 1.2% 0.1% 0.1% 07 820 181 164 235 228 6 5 0 1 0 0 22.1% 20.0% 28.7% 27.8% 0.7% 0.6% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 42.1% 56.5% 1.3% 0.1% 0.0% 08 725 166 152 198 187 5 10 2 3 0 2 22.9% 21.0% 27.3% 25.8% 0.7% 1.4% 0.3% 0.4% 0.0% 0.3% 43.9% 53.1% 2.1% 0.7% 0.3% 09 771 207 153 197 202 7 3 1 1 0 I 0 26.8% 19.8% 25.6% 26.2% 0.9% I 0.4% 0.1% 0.1% o.o I 0.0% 46.7% 51.8% 1.3% 0.3% 0.0% 110 I 841 192 I 138 248 I 248 7 I 6 1 I 0 0 I 1 I I 22.8% I 16.4% 29.5% I 29.5% o.8% I o.7% 0.1% I 0.0% 0.0% I 0.1% 39.2% 59.0% 1.5% 0.1% 0.1% 111 I 648 168 I 152 138 I 177 2 I 6 2 I 3 0 I 0 I I 25.9% I 23.5% 21.3% 127.3% o.3% I o.9% o.3% I o.5% 0.0% I 0.0% 49.4% 48.6% 1.2% 0.8% 0.0% 112 I 549 147 I 121 125 I 131 7 I 6 2 I 4 0 I 0 I I 26.8% I 23.1% 22.8% I 23.9% 1.3% I 1.1% 0.4% I o.7% 0.0% I 0.0% 49.9% 46.6% 2.4% 1.1% 0.0% I District I 9192 1992 I 1793 26341 2588 73 I 70 16 I 19 21 5 I I 21.7% I 19.5% 28.7% 128.2% 0.8% I 0.8% 0.2% I 0.2% 0.0% I 0.1% 41.2% 56.8% 1.6% 0.4% 0.1% I District I 8370 1865 I 1643 23501 2337 681 67 14 I 19 21 5 !Grades 1-12 I 22.3% I 19.6% 28.1% 127.9% o.8% I o.8% 0.2% I 0.2% 0.0% I 0.1% 41.9% 56.0% 1.6% 0.4% 0.1% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA *60-02-050 OCTOBER 1, 1997 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: AMBOY ELEMENTARY SCHOO GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK GRADE TOTAL K 52 22 30 R 01 68 29 39 02 78 37 41 mv 21 1997 03 68 31 37 OFFIOCFE 04 71 36 35 DESEGREMGOANTIITOONR ING 05 63 34 29 SCHOOL 400 189 211 TOTALS 47.3% 52.8% GRADES 348 167 181 01-05 48.0% 52.0%  PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-058 OCTOBER 1, 1997 :OUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY SC GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK GRADE TOTAL K 26 13 13 01 39 17 22 02 39 15 24 03 41 19 22 04 36 14 22 05 37 16 21 SCHOOL 218 94 124 TOTALS 43.1% 56.9% GRADES 192 81 111 01-05 42.2% 57.8% LEA #60-02-054 :ouNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL J 35 K 71 01 83 02 58 03 60 04 69 05 59 SCHOOL 435 TOTALS GRADES 329 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 1, 1997 DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 3 32 7 64 13 70 8 50 9 51 8 61 8 51 56 379 12.9% 87.1% 46 283 14.0% 86.0% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-069 OCTOBER 1, 1997 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: SEVENTH STREET ELEMENT GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK GRADE TOTAL K 90 13 77 01 46 10 36 02 70 12 58 03 70 24 46 04 56 31 25 05 48 23 25 SCHOOL 380 113 267 TOTALS 29.7% 70.3% GRADES 290 100 190 01-05 34.5% 65.5% LEA #60-02-060 :OUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 66 01 58 02 73 03 71 04 75 05 60 SCHOOL 403 TOTALS GRADES 337 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 1, 1997 DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: LYNCH DRIVE ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 28 38 12 46 20 53 20 51 22 53 20 40 122 281 30.3% 69.7% 94 243 27.9% 72.1% LEA 160-02-061 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 23 01 21 02 34 03 40 04 34 05 25 SCHOOL 177 TOTALS GRADES 154 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 1, 1997 DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 11 12 6 15 10 24 12 28 13 21 9 16 61 116 34.5% 65.5% 50 104 32.5% 67.5% LEA i60-02-050 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 72 01 90 02 71 03 75 04 81 05 84 SCHOOL 473 TOTALS GRADES 401 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 1, 1997 DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTA GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 46 26 47 43 37 34 37 38 45 36 48 36 260 213 55.0% 45.0% 214 187 53.4% 46.6% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-055 OCTOBER 1, 1997 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY S GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK GRADE TOTAL K 44 29 15 01 51 28 23 02 51 24 27 03 39 24 15 04 49 31 18 05 31 20 11 SCHOOL 265 156 109 TOTALS 58.9% 41.1% GRADES 221 127 94 01-05 57.5% 42.5% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-064 OCTOBER 1, 1997 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: PARK HILL ELEMENTARY S GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK GRADE TOTAL K 40 24 16 01 44 21 23 02 43 22 21 03 41 21 20 04 40 17 23 05 37 19 18 SCHOOL 245 124 121 TOTALS 50.6% 49.4% GRADES 205 100 105 01-05 48.8% 51. 2% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-065 OCTOBER 1, 1997 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY S GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK GRADE TOTAL K 61 24 37 01 71 30 41 02 67 29 38 03 49 25 24 04 42 22 20 05 46 27 19 SCHOOL 336 157 179 TOTALS 46.7% 53.3% GRADES 275 133 142 01-05 48.4% 51. 6% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-053 OCTOBER 1, 1997 :::ouNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: BELWOOD ELEMENTARY SCH GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK GRADE TOTAL K 19 10 9 01 35 17 18 02 20 7 13 03 23 7 16 04 18 6 12 05 25 11 14 06 6 3 3 SCHOOL 146 61 85 TOTALS 41. 8% 58.2% GRADES 127 51 76 01-05 40.2% 59.8% LEA #60-02-056 -:'.OUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL K 25 01 31 02 22 03 24 04 22 05 34 SCHOOL 158 TOTALS GRADES 133 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENTB Y SCHOOL OCTOBER 1, 1997 DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY SC GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 2 23 6 25 4 18 7 17 2 20 9 25 30 128 19.0% 81.0% 28 105 21.1% 78.9% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-057 OCTOBER 1, 1997 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: INDIAN HILLS ELEMENTAR GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK GRADE TOTAL K 63 42 21 01 76 36 40 02 80 41 39 03 61 25 36 04 64 24 40 05 50 21 29 SCHOOL 394 189 205 TOTALS 48.0% 52.0% GRADES 331 147 184 01-05 44.4% 55.6% LEA #60-02-067 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL J 108 K 27 SCHOOL 135 TOTALS GRADES 0 01-05 PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 1, 1997 DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: REDWOOD ELEMENTARY SCH GRADE SPAN: K-05 NON-BLACK BLACK 13 95 0 27 13 122 9.6% 90.4% 0 0 .0% .0% ELEMENTARY NON-BLACK BLACK TOTALS ELEM 4165 1625 2540 WITH K 39.0% 61.0% ELEM 3343 1338 2005 01-05 40.0% 60.0% LEA #60-02-076 :ouNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 09 53 10 114 11 612 12 525 SCHOOL 1304 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENTB Y SCHOOL OCTOBER 1, 1997 DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: NORTH LITTLE ROCK HIGH GRADE SPAN: 11-12 NON-BLACK BLACK 10 43 32 82 325 287 287 238 654 650 50.2% 49.8% LEA #60-02-075 2OUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 09 10 690 675 SCHOOL 1365 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 1, 1997 DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: NORTH LITTLE ROCK HIGH GRADE SPAN: 09-10 NON-BLACK 352 298 650 47.6% BLACK 338 377 715 52.4% PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL LEA #60-02-076 OCTOBER 1, 1997 :::OUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: ARGENTA ACADEMY GRADE SPAN: 7-12 NON-BLACK BLACK GRADE TOTAL 06 9 4 5 07 7 1 6 08 15 4 11 09 25 10 15 10 48 13 35 11 35 7 28 12 22 6 16 SCHOOL 161 45 116 TOTALS 28.0% 72.0% LEA #60-02-072 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 07 354 08 300 SCHOOL 654 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 1, 1997 DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: RIDGEROAD MIDDLE SCHOO GRADE SPAN: 07-08 NON-BLACK 127 123 250 38.2% BLACK 227 177 404 61. 8% LEA #60-02-070 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 07 264 08 268 SCHOOL 532 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 1, 1997 DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: LAKEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADE SPAN: 07-08 NON-BLACK 156 160 316 59.4% BLACK 108 108 216 40.6% LEA #60-02-077 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 07 195 08 142 09 3 10 4 11 1 12 2 SCHOOL 347 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL OCTOBER 1, 1997 DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: ROSE CITY MIDDLE SCHOO GRADE SPAN: 07-08 NON-BLACK BLACK 73 122 53 89 0 3 2 2 1 0 0 2 129 218 37.2% 62.8% LEA #60-02-059 COUNTY: PULASKI GRADE TOTAL 06 664 SCHOOL 664 TOTALS PUPIL ENROLLMENTB Y SCHOOL OCTOBER 1, 1997 DISTRICT: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: CENTRAL 6TH GRADE CENT NON-BLACK 301 301 45.3% BLACK 363 363 54.7% GRADE SPAN: 06 SECONDARY TOTALS SEC 5027 NON-BLACK 2345 46.6% BLACK 2682 53.4% DISTRICT NON-BLACK BLACK TOTALS 9192 3970 5222 43.2% 56.8% W/0 8370 3683 4687 GR K\u0026amp;J 44.0% 56.0% NCOIB) T IBII LIITTILJEJ E(O)CIBC:1 F1IJIB3CILCI IC CIB (I0 )(0)I L~ ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 2700 POPLAR STREET December 5, 1997 Memo To: Mellisa Guiden, Office of Desegregation Monitoring From: Bobby J. Acklin, Assistant Superintendent for Desegregation Subject: School Building Capacities Enclosed is a copy of North Little Rock School District Building Capacities Report. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER P. 0. BOX 687, NORTH LITTLE ROCK. AR 72115/0687 501/771-8000 STEP 1- 1997-98 School Building Capacity REDWOOD (without portable) CURRENT USE ONL Y--ACTUAL CAPACITY NOT CALCULATED Identify each room by use and capacity. 6 Pre K 2 K 1 Special X18=108 X 20 = 40 X 2 = 2 I.  STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity I. - AMBOY ELEMENTARY (with double portable) Identify each room by use and capacity. 3 K 10 1-3, 3/4 6 4-5 4 Special 1 Special X 20 = 60 X 23 = 230 X 25 = 150 X 8 = 32 X 23 = 23 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 495 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 (Computer room not included in calculations) = -6 Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 489 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 440 CURRENT CAPACITY - 440 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity AMBOY ELEMENTARY (without portable) Identify each room by use and capacity. 3 9 6 4 K 1, 3 /4 4-5 Special X 20 = 60 X 23 = 207 X 25 = 150 X 8 = 32 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 449 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 (Computer room not included in calculations) = -6 Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 443 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 399 CURRENT CAPACITY - 399 STEP.1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- Grades K-5 School Building Capacity BELWOOD ELEMENTARY (with portable) Identify each room by use and capacity. 1 4 2 5 K, K-1 1-3, 3/4 4-5 Special X 20 = 20 X23 = 92 X 25 = 50 X 8 =40 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 202 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 1997-98 Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 196 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 176 CURRENT CAPACITY= 176 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity BELWOOD ELEMENTARY (without portable) Identify each room by use and capacity. 1 1 1 5 K, K-1 1-3, 3/4 4-5 Special X20 = 20 X 23 = 23 X 25 = 25 X 8 =40 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\" = 108 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 1 02 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 92 CURRENT CAPACITY= 92 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- Grades K-5 School Building Capacity BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY (without portable) Identify each room by use and capacity. 4 9 6 6 3 K 1-3 4-5 Special Special X 20 = 80 X 23 = 207 X 25 = 150 X 8 = 48 X 23 = 69 1997-98 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 554 (Pre-School (2 rooms) and computer lab not included in calculations.) Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 548 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 493 CURRENT CAPACITY - 493 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY (with double portable) Identify each room by use and capacity. 3 6 3 4 K, K-1 1-3, 3/4 4-5 Special X 20 = 60 X 23 = 138 X 25 = 75 X 8 = 32 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 305 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 299 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 269 CURRENT CAPACITY - 269 ------ ----- STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- Grades K-5 School Buildlng Capacity CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY (without portables) Identify each room by use and capacity. 3 5 3 3 K, K-1 1-3, 3/4 4-5 Special X 20 = 60 X 23 = 115 X 25 = 75 X 8 = 24 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\" = 27 4 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 268 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 241 CURRENT CAPACITY - 241 1997-98 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY (without portable) STEP 1- Identify each room by use and capacity. I I 2 K X20 = 40 I 3 1-3,3/4 X23= 69 2 4-5 X25 = 50 I 6 Special X 8= 48 I 2 Special X23 = 46 I I STEP 2- Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 253 I STEP 3- Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 I (Computer lab not counted) I I STEP 4- Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical I Capacity\" = 247 I STEP 5- Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 222 I I CURRENT CAPACITY - 222 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity IND/AN HILLS ELEMENTARY (without portable) STEP 1- Identify each room by use and capacity. 3 K X20= 60 I 11 1-3 X 23 = 253 I 4 4-5 X 25 = 100 I 1 Ortho/Special X23 = 23 I 7 Special/Othro X 8= 56 I STEP 2- Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 492 I I STEP 3- Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 I I STEP 4- Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical I Capacity\" = 486 I STEP 5- Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 437 I I CURRENT CAPACITY - 437 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY (without portable) Identify each room by use and capacity. 2 5 3 5 1 K 1-3 4-5 Special Special X 20 = 40 X 23 = 115 X 25 = 75 X 8 = 40 X 23 = 23 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 293 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 (Computer lab not included.) Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 287 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 258 CURRENT CAPACITY - 258 -------- STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity LYNCH DRIVE ELEMENTARY (without portable) Identify eag_h room by use and capacity. 4 9 6 7 4 K, K-1 1, 2, 3, (3,4) 4, 5 Special Ed Special X 20 = 80 X23 = 207 X 25 = 150 X 8 = 56 X23 = 92 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\" = 585 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 (Computer lab not included in calculations.) Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 579 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 521 CURRENT CAPACITY - 521 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY (with portable) Identify each room by use and capacity. 2 4 2 6 K, K-1 1-3,3/4 4-5 Resource X 20 = 40 X 23 = 92 X 25 = 50 X 8 = 48 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\" = 230 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 224 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\"= 202 CURRENT CAPACITY - 202 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY (without portable) STEP 1- Identify each room by use and capacity. 2 4 2 5 K, K-1 1-3,3/4 4-5 Resourc:e X20 = 40 X 23 = 92 X 25 = 50 X 8 = 40 STEP 2- Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 222 STEP 3- Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 STEP 4- Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 216 STEP 5- Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 194 CURRENT CAPACITY - 194 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY (with portables) Identify each room by use and capacity. 4 11 6 2 6 K, K-1 1-3, 3/4 4-5 Special Resource X 20 = 80 X 23 = 253 X 25 = 150 X 23 = 46 X 8 = 48 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 577 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 (Computer lab not included.) Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 571 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\"= 514 CURRENT CAPACITY= 514 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY (without portables) Identify each room by use and capacity. 4 K, K-1 10 1-3, 3/4 6 4-5 5 Resource X 20 = 80 X 23 = 230 X 25 = 150 X 8 = 40 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\" = 500 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 (Computer lab not included.) Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 494 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 445 CURRENT CAPACITY= 445 I ,\u0026amp;./ f,. w STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity PARK HILL ELEMENTARY (without portable) Identify each room by use and capacity. 2 6 3 5 1 K, K-1 1-3, 3/4 4-5 Special Special X 20 = 40 X 23 = 138 X 25= 75 X 8 = 40 X 23 = 23 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 316 Special Adjustments - Speech -6= -6 (Computer lab not included.) Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 310 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 279 CURRENT CAPACITY - 279 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY (without portable) Identify each room by use and capacity. 3 8 4 5 1 K 1-3 4-5 Special Special X 20 = 60 X 23 = 184 X 25 = 100 X 8 = 40 X 23 = 23 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 407 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 401 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 361 CURRENT CAPACITY - 361 --------------------------- STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grades K-5 School Building Capacity SEVENTH STREET ELEMENTARY (without portable) Identify each room by use and capacity. 5 K X 20 = 100 8 1-3 X 23 = 184 4 4-5 X 25 = 100 6 Special X 8 = 48 2 Special X23 = 46 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\" = 478 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 (Computer lab not included also 4 Speciality classrooms not counted) Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 472 Multiply by 90% to determine \"Capacity\" = 425 CURRENT CAPACITY - 425 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grade 6 School Building Capacity POPLAR STREET MIDDLE (with portables) Identify each room by use and capacity - Sixth grade rooms. 37 rooms-A102, A108, A109, A111, A112, G1, G2, P1, P2, P3, P4, 101, 103, 105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,200,201,202,203,204, 2058, 207,208,209,210,211,212,213, 214@25 = 925 8-Resource-A 110, A 104A, A 1048, PS, 102, 102A, 205A, 205C @ 8=64 (Not counted 115) Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 989 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 983 Multiply by 85% to determine \"Capacity\" = 836 CURRENT CAPACITY - 836 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grade 6 School Building Capacity POPLAR STREET MIDDLE (without portable) Identify each room by use and capacity - Sixth grade rooms. 33 rooms-A102, A108, A109, A111, A112, G1, G2, 101,103,105,106,107,108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 2058, 207, 208, 209, 210,211,212,213, 214@25 = 825 7-Resource-A110, A104A, A1048, 102, 102A, 205A, 205C@8=56 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 881 Special Adjustments - Speech -6 = -6 Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 875 Multiply by 85% to determine \"Capacity\" = 7 44 CURRENT CAPACITY - 7 44 ... .I/ ,~ ' '1 1997-98 Grades 7-8 School Building Capacity LAKEWOOD MIDDLE (with portable) STEP 1 - Identify each room housing daily scheduled classes and its capacity by size, law, or curriculum. 28 regular rooms - Gym, Gym, 100, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109,110,111,202,203,204,206,207,209,210,211,212,213,214 215, Choir, 405, Band @ 25 = 700 3 Special Education rooms - 106, 201, 205 @ 15 = 45 Rooms 200A, 2008, 208, 215 @ 8 = 24 Rooms 101 and Portable SAC are used for pull out programs not considered - 0 STEP 2 - Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 769 STEP 3- Special Adjustments - Room 201 1/2 (-12), Choir 1/2 (-13), 405 only (-21) = -46 STEP 4 - Subtract STEP 3 from STEP 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 723 STEP 5 - Multiply by 85% to determine \"Capacity\" = 615 CURRENT CAPACITY - 615 1997-98 Grades 7-8 School Building Capacity LAKEWOOD MIDDLE (without portable) STEP 1 - Identify each room housing daily scheduled classes and its capacity by size, law, or curriculum. 27 regular rooms - Gym, Gym, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 110,111,202,203,204,206,207,209,210,211,212,213,214,215, Choir, 405, Band @ 25 = 675 3 Special Education rooms - 106, 201, 205 @ 15 = 45 Rooms 200A, 2008, 208@ 8 = 24 Rooms 101 and 107 are used for pull out programs not considered - O STEP 2 - Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\" = 7 44 STEP 3 - Special Adjustments - Room 201 1/2 (-12), Choir 1/2 (-13), 405 only (-21) = -46 STEP 4 - Subtract STEP 3 from STEP 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 698 STEP 5 - Multiply by 85% to determine \"Capacity\" = 593 CURRENT CAPACITY - 593 STEP 1 - 1997-98 Grades 7-8 School Building Capacity RIDGEROAD MIDDLE (with portables) Identify each room housing daily scheduled classes and its capacity by size, law, oi: curriculum. 28 regular rooms - FA 1, F A2., Gym 1, Gym 2, G6, G8, P4, 103, 122, 123,124,125,126,127,129,130,132,134,136,221,222,223,224, 226, 227, 229, P1 @25 = 700 11 Special Education room - C1, G3, G4,G5, L 1, 104, 128, P3, 225, 228, 231 @ 8 = 88 Rooms 102 (computer lab), Speech and P2 (SAC) are used for pull out programs not considered. = O STEP 2 - Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 788 STEP 3 - Special Adjustments -49 STEP 4 - Subtract STEP 3 from STEP 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 739 STEP 5 - Multiply by 85% to determine \"Capacity\"= 628 CURRENT CAPACITY - 628 ---------- 1997-98 Grades 7-8 School Building Capacity RIDGEROAD MIDDLE (without portable) STEP 1 - Identify each room housing daily scheduled classes and its capacity by size, law, or curriculum. 26 regular rooms - FA1, FA2, Gym 1, Gym 2, G6, GS, 103, 121, 122, 123, 124,125,126,127,129,130,132,134,136,221,222,223,224,226, 227, 229, @ 25 = 650 10 Special Education r.ooms - C1, G3, G4,G5, L 1,104,128,225,228,231 @8 = 80 Rooms 102 (computer lab) and Speech are used for pull out programs not considered. = O STEP 2 - Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 730 STEP 3 - Special Adjustments -49 STEP 4 - Subtract STEP 3 from STEP 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\"= 681 STEP 5 - Multiply by 85% to determine \"Capacity\" = 579 CURRENT CAPACITY - 579 STEP 1- 1997-98 Grades 7-8 School Building Capacity ROSE CITY MIDDLE ( without portable) Identify each room housing daily scheduled classes and its capacity by size, law, or curriculum. 19regularrooms-105, S1, S2, S3, 106,109,110,111,112,115, 116, Art, HE1, HE2, Gym 1, Gym 2, FA, THE, LAB@ 25 = 475 11 Special Education rooms - 100,102, 103, 104, 108, 114, 113, 117, 118,119, Shop@8 = 88 Rooms 101, 107 are used for pull out programs not considered = O STEP 2 - Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\"= 563 STEP 3 - Special Adjustments -Room 116 1/2 (-12), HE2 1/2 (-13) = -25 STEP 4 - Subtract STEP 3 from STEP 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 538 STEP 5 - Multiply by 85% to determine \"Capacity\" = 457 CURRENT CAPACITY -457 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- 1997-98 Grade 7 -12 School Building Capacity ARGENTA ACADEMY (without portable) Identify each room by use and capacity. 16 X 8 = 128 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\" = 128 Special Adjustments - Program still evolving. Adaptable. Does not count seats unless full time assignment possible. Subtract Step 3 from Step 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 128 Multiply by 100% to determine \"Capacity\" = 128 CURRENT CAPACITY - 128 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- Grades 9-10 School Building Capacity NLRHS - EAST CAMPUS (with portable) (112 for Jr. High) 1997-98 Identify each room housing daily scheduled classes and its capacity by size, law, or curriculum. 60 regular rooms - Stage, 501, 502, 504, 5058, 101, 103, 106, 107, 108, 109,110,111,112,113,115,116,117,118,200,202,204,205, 206,207,208,209,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219, 220,221,222,223,224,225,301,302,303,304,305,306,401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 503, Gym 1, Gym 2, Gym 3, Gym 4, Gym 5, LR1, 60@25 = 1500 Reading rooms - P1, 203 @ 15 = 30 9 Special Education rooms -102A, 1028, 102C, 1020, 114A, 1148, LR, 210, 201@ 8 = 72 Room 104, P2, and P3 is used for pull out programs not considered = 0 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\" = 1602 Special Adjustments - 202 (-8), 501 (-12) = -20 Subtract STEP 3 from STEP 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 1597 Multiply by 85% to determine \"Capacity\" = 1357 CURRENT CAPACITY - 1357 (Divide by 2 for 9th grade) 678 10th grade - Multiply STEP 4 by 80% to determine \"Capacity\" = 1278 (Divide by 2 for 10th grade) 639 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- Grades 9-10 School Building Capacity 1997-98 NLRHS - EAST CAMPUS (without portable) (112 for Jr. High) Identify each room housing daily scheduled classes and its capacity by size, law, or curriculum. 58 regular rooms - Stage, 501, 502, 504, 5058, 101, 103, 106, 107, 108, 109,110,111,112,113,115,116,117,118,200,201, 205,206,207, 208,209,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219, 220,221,222,223,224,225,301,302,303,304,305,306,401, 402, 403, 405, 406, 503, Gym 1, Gym 2, Gym 3, Gym 4, Gym 5 @ 25 = 1450 Reading rooms - 203 @ 15 = 15 9 Special Education rooms - LR, 102A, 1028, 102C, 102D, 114A, 1148, 201, 210@8 = 72 Room 104 is used for pull out programs not considered = 0 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\" = 1537 Special Adjustments - 202 (-8), 501 (-12) = -20 Subtract STEP 3 from STEP 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 1517 Multiply by 85% to determine \"Capacity\" = 1289 CURRENT CAPACITY -1289 (Divide by 2 for 9th grade) 644 10th grade - Multiply STEP 4 by 80% to determine \"Capacity\"= 1214 (Divide by 2 for 10th grade) 607 STEP 1- STEP 2- STEP 3- STEP 4- STEP 5- Grades 11-12 School Building Capacity 1997-98 NLRHS - WEST CAMPUS (without portable) Identify each room housing daily scheduled classes and its capacity by size, law, or curriculum. 50, 54, 55, 56,101,109,111,112,113,114,115,117,118,200,201,202,203, 204,205A, 206,210, 212,213A, 214,217,218,222,302,304, 305A, 306, 308,311,403,404,406,407,408,409,410,413,414,416,417,510, 511, 512, G1, G2, G3, 600, 601, 603, 605, 606, 607, 608, 609, 610, stage---- 60 X 25 = 1500 21, 22, 23----3 X 15 = 45 207, 412----2 X 10 = 20 208,209,215,216,215,219,220,400,401,419,611, G4----12 X 8 = 96 602---1 X 5 = 5 11 2--- 1 X 2 = 2 Add capacities for \"Total Physical Capacity\" = 1668 Special Adjustments - none Subtract STEP 3 from STEP 2 to determine \"Adjusted Physical Capacity\" = 1668 Multiply by 80% to determine \"Capacity\" = 1334 CURRENT CAPACITY - 1334 ----- NOV-21-F9R7I 1 0:13A M PULASCKOSI CHOOLS Ft-'lNXO 4. 900483 P. 02 - a: - -.- . , OCTOBER 1, 1997 ENROLLMENTR EPORT ., (Revised 10-28-97) % w-mE FVC':C HISHIN!C NIDN' P. :fSLAi'.'D J:M.ihl\"'ES\u0026lt;J}{) SCHOOL EJiS GIHS IDS Grn.S KJJS GIRS B:lIS GIRE KhS GIH.S 1DrAL Adkins 88 '\",t 7 6 70 ,11 4 7 l 1 d' 283 -f' Arnold Drive 139 ~'\\]59 41 i6 44 2 5 l \u0026lt;l 391 ~ Baker 124 Pf26 35 (,~ 30 l I 316 ~Bates 1f'I ~'?,132 -'I 466 b4 111 88 131 2 2 Bayou Meta 289 ~?96 7 '\"' 9 6 3 l 2 l 13 614 3 Cato 211 .,/Or 9 s 62 11~ 54 3: 2 2 1 529 ~d\" Clinton i\"!f70 Ji~ ~I 174 183 199 9 4 3 4 1 74 7 ~I College Station 78 15179 73 ,~~ 51 2 l 1 4 t 289 ~3 Crystal Hill 202 16179 179 Jl,~186 l .1 .. 1 .3 749 ! ~ Dupree 137 ) I.1le2\u0026gt;9 so '11 41 3 2 4 3 1 J3 370 l~-5 Fuller Elem. 68 1~4 122 ,~\\1s 2 2 .Jj I 293 ~ Harris 64 ,~, 57 68 ,~1 79 4 3 l ~ 276  SB J'ville Elem. .,o, ~~, 147 l Ir ~ 167 143 126 ~ 4 l 3 2 592 Landmark 1~\n).- ~ ol:\\ I -131 121 109 100 l 4 6 2 I\u0026gt; 15 Lawson ~lo3 ..110 0 138 20 20 281 t4 Oak Grove Elem. li6 3~161 42 40 48 2 1 l 1 431 ~' Oakbrooke 190 ~!56 57 '\" 54 2 2 2 I l 3 l ,, 468 ~ Pine Forest 317.0 q5. ,1 i 208 52 43 7 3 4 3 490 19 Pinewood ~1q J(p\u0026lt; i ,~ 139 140 80 89 3 1 2 4 1 l 460 ~ Robinson Elem. 160 ~ 10\"6 148 43 \"\" 51 l I 403 ~3 (/l 34 ~p 23 0 I Scott 33 27 1171(3 Sherwood 151\n/.~3 132 57 CJ'l 40 1 I 381~ Sylvan Hills Elem. 167 ~f{l 130 59 ,,~ 53 2 1 l 1 41311 Taylor 132 ~129 89 ,5~ 66 l I 417.3'7 Tolleson 188 3.1\\1 159 65 ,~o 55 3 11 5 4 3 1 ~, 494~/ 1,o~~ 3.~~\\ ,i~ TOTAL ELEM. 13,645 3,383 1,864 1,757 55 47 23 33 17 B 10,832~3 NOV-21-F9R7I 1 0:1 3 AM PULASCKOSI CHOOLS FAXN O4, 900483 P. 01  '4 ... ,, OCTOBER 1, 1997ENROLLMENT REPORT WHITE BLACK HISPANIC ASIAN/ P. rsu,Nr AM. IND.' ESKIM) SCHOOL OOYS GIRLS BOYS GTRLS OOYS GIRJ.,:::\n1:!0Y!::i GIRLS BOYS c..\n1RU:i ~ !,'l ~193 13 Fuller Jr. High 282 185 188 4 4 4 l J'ville Jr, High ~~is #01 1! 245 146 161 6 3 4 2 J'ville Middle 233 ..,r, 244 127 ~130 1 2 2 1 1 l J'ville High 353 !~9- ~,\u0026gt;I 17 L. :) 167 147 3 4 6 4 Mills High ~~I ~77 1 215 176 189 2 l 5 l North Pulaski ~ 1 99\n,JJCt92 ,~ 302 114 2 7 2 1 1 l 1,,1 ,~., Northwood ~ 344 fl 73 92 97 4 6 9 3 2 l Oak Grove \u0026lt;J.I ~ioi I 1!\u0026gt; 355 306 99 105 5 1 2 6 1 Rob. Jr, High 180 ~f43 67 ,~lt 69 Rob, High 145 ~is3 79 ,~\"\u0026gt; 43 l 1 ~ l S. Hills Jr. High (P.f\n6L9 ~ 324 282 128 2 ~ l l S. Hills High ~~4 _\n)-II ,, 299 110 101 5 3 2 1 TOTAL SEC, l,,I05 ~-tt5o (~1 3,277 2 828 1,506 l 444 30 39 29 26 5 8 DIST. TOTAL 6,922 6,211 3,370 3,201 85.,- 86....- 52....- ~~9 22 ..... 15.....- - pa (NOTE: Students atter.ding the Alternative Learning Center at Scott are included in the totals of their home school.) ------------- - 2 - q ! TO!'ALI 861 775 I 741 ~ 979 760 821 831 ~ ~ ~ X, 880\" a ol ~'l 459~ 423 871 301 785 oli l 1 q:\ni ~ 20,024 ~~1 I FAXN O.4 900483 P. 01 OCTOBER ('lfff: '3tud1:: ~ ,:,r:i1:1g thio Alt1,:rnc,:1ve Lear, 1:1~:.r C 0 n .. e.:- a_ S.:. 1nc',,d!\" :r. r:e tot ls of '-h.\u0026lt;!ll' :.orr1e s,~t:ci..,.l,) F~XN O,4 900483 P. 02 ij SCHOOL I /--11.lkl'~S 1t----- ! ArnrJlo Drive 't-= I Rr1ker OCT-22-W97E 0D3 :42P M PULASCKOIU NSTCYH OOLS .. ' ' . FAXN O5. 014900483 DATE: TO: FROM: .,, j ' ... Pulaski County Special School District 925 E. Dixon Road/ P.O. Box 8601 Little Rock, AR 72216 501-490-2000 FAX 490-0483 October 22, 1997 Cynthia Howell, Arkansas Democrat-Gazette Little Rock Free Press Jacksonville Patriot North Pulaski Leader Sherwood Voice Norlh Little Rock Times Maumelle Monitor Drop Zone Arkansas Times Arkansas State Press KAAK-TV-Channel 4 KATV-TV-Channel 7 KKYK-TV-Channel 22 KLRT-TV~Channel 16 KTHV-TV-Channel 11 KARN Radio KSYG Radio Associated Press J. R. Huie, Arkansas PubHc School Week Jim Burgett, Board of Education Arlyne Cherven, Board of Education Mildred Tatum, Board of Education Mack McAlister, Board of Education Office of Desegregation Monitoring Joy Springer, Walker Law Firm, Joshua lntervenors PACT Ron Standridge, Information Services Specialist 490-2000 NUMBER OF PAGES: 2 (including transmittal page) P. 01/03 OCT-22-W97E 0D3 :43P M PULASCKOIU NSTCYH OOLS FAXt~ O5. 014900483 P. 02/C3 OCTOBER 1, 199i ENROLLC\"IENT REPORT (10/22/97) SCHOOL \\AJ-ITIE BI.A._'1( HI...Sffi'ITC !:BPN/ P. Th'IA\\D A\"'!.I NY ES\\..u'\"\"-0 8JtS GIH\"B EIJx'S GIRT:.S 8JYS GL.\nLS ID1S GIRLS , .3JyS C-JRS R,T\nl.L ii ll Adkins 88 76 70 4i 1 l 283 :1 Arnold Drive 139 159 41 44 2 5 1 391 I Baker ' 124 126 35 30 1 316 '. Bates I 111 88 J.31 132 2 2 4 6 6 I I Bayou Meta 289 296 7 9 6 3 1 2 l 614 1 Cato 211 195 62 54 :, 3 2 2 529 II Clinton 174 170 183 199 9 4 3 4 l 74 7 I! .\\ College Station 78 79 73 51 2 l 1 4 289 ii Crystal Hill 201 179 179 186 l l 1 748 :i Dupree 137 129 50 41 3 2 4 3 l 3 70 1! Fuller Elem. 68 83 122 115 2 2 3 0 ~ Iii  ,t. ,1 I Harris 641 57 68 79 4 3 l ? - - 11 - IO :I J'ville Elem. I 11 147 160 142 126 l 4 l 3 2 1 s s 7 !I I ,, I I ,I Lar.dmark 131 121 109 100 j_ 462 Ii I Lawson 138 103 20 20 I I 2 s 1 Ii Oak Grove Elem. 11 176 161 42 48 2 1 1 431 i! Oakbrooke 190 156 57 54 2 2 2 l 3 1 466 ii Ptne Forest 208 170 52 43 7 3 4 3 490 !I i' Pinewood 139 140 80 89 3 l 2 4 l l 4 60 il I Robinson Elem. 160 148 43 51 l 403 II Scott ,, 33 34 27 23 117 11 Sherwood l. 51 132 57 40, 1 I 381 Sylvan Hills Elem. 167 130 59 :-)~\" .11 2 l l 413 I Taylor I 132 129 88 66 1 416 Tolleson 188 159 65 55 3 11 5 4 3 1 494 TOTAL ELEM. 3,644 3,380 1,862 1,753 55 47 23 33 l7 8 10,824 OCT-22-W97E 0D3 :44P M PULASCKOIU NSTCYH OOLS FAXN O5. 014900483 P. 03/03 OCTOBER 1, 1997 ENROLLMENT REPORT w\"HITE BLACK HISPA:.JIC 1\\SIAN/ P. ISLANT' AM. IND. / ESKIMO..,_ SCHOOL .t:'OYS GIRLS BOYS GIRLS BOYS GIRLti tlOY~ GIRLS EOYS I GlRLti Fuller Jr. High 282 185 186 193 4 4 4 1 J'ville Jr. High 245 208 146 161 6 3 4 2 J'vifle Middle 230 244 123 130 2 2 l l 1 J'ville High 350 291 167 147 3 4 6 4 Mills High 215 176  188 177 2 1 5 l ~Jorth Pulaski 301 299 114 92 2 7 2 l 1 1 Northwood 346 276 90 97 4 6 9 3 2 l Oak Grove 355 306 99 105 5 1 2 6 l Rob. Jr. High _180 140 66 69 Rob. High 144 153 78 43 1 l 1 S. Hills Jr. High 323 283 128 129 2 4 1 1 I S. Hills High 299 264 llO 101 5 3 2 l TOTAL SEC. 3,272 2,825 1,495 1,444 30 39 29 26 5 8 DIST. TOTAL 6,916 6,205 3,357 3,199 85 86 52 30 22 16 (NOTE: Students attending the Alternative Learning Center at Scott are included in the totals of their home school.) - 2 - TOfAL 859 775 734 97? 765 820 834 880 455 421 873 785 C'l\n7\u0026lt; 19,997  ( ,,\u0026gt;.. ..,.- ,, ,_ LEJ\\,tt +----- -+ Enrull Fl.If- IL_ H-IRC!LLMENT f:.'l SCl--10iJL i=\"Of\n:ti - SCHUCiL CHO ICE DY CHG ICE -- ADE FormU Fin 09-00-(HO R/5'2 Law 20 - U_s_ C 1221F-l US DepRrtment a~ Educ~tion F APD6 FU92 +- --------- --- ----- --- ------------ ----------------------------------------------+NUMB ER iASIAN/P(,C. 1Ai1 !NOIAr~ i of' i iHSFi,rHC ! ifISr-'/1i\\ilC j HISPANIC [ ISLANDER l1-iLASr\":lir~ !CLASSES I. - -- ------------- ---------------------------------------------- f----- i Bogs fGir}s18 oysJAirl519o y s i Gi r} ~ I Bo~ Si Gi r] S l Boys f Girl~ f t --- ------- ---- ---- ------- ---- ---- ---------- -----------------------+---- - ---- ----- --------------- - ----+ r ., L I ANMUAI. SC:IIOOL REPOHT :! ,~ LEl\\11 : 60030GIQ - P\\Jf' IL ENHDLLMFNT n-: ~.c, ICJOL nmM   Uc tn h Pr 1, - SCIIUUL CHOICE: IJY CHOICE - J?97 LD = g . Count'l : PUU\\SIU .~ j~ 'f Scltool . PIIU\\SlO COUNTY :,-~rade Sp\n,n ... __ _ ___ _ __\n I li- 1 Iv: Ii \u0026lt;  :1- fl dtr-1l o/--  j, _ _  .-1'1DE :orrnlL Fi.n_ 09_-00=010.JU.92- ____ _ La~ 20 - U.S. C 122lE-l ---------- -----------. - ----- IJS Department of E\u0026lt;.lu~\n,tion _FAP06 R/9\nl ___ __ ___ -- _ --- ., -- - - - -- -- ---- --- ------- ----- - ---- ---- -- ----- -- ---- - -----+NUMBER I l~HITE NOT I IlLACI\\ NOT I ___ , .i-ll SPA~HC i  .Hl~PAr~rc_ I ill SPAN [:.,_..J i.SLAl~DER... JI\\LASKAN--I..CL..SSES- - - ------7-- --- ---- Grade + ------------------------------------------------------ -+-- -- Tot~ l IBo~srGirlslBoyslGiris!Do~slGarlslfio~slGirlslBu~slGirlsl IASiAN/PAC. JAM INDIAN I oF - _+-._ -+ ___ t--------------- ------. --- . -- - - - - -. ----- ---=c. - -- - -=-,.. --=--- --------------------- i=:nrol l. ii-I 181 I ol 41 4! JI l I l I I I 1 +----+ 1--------------------------------- - ci :z: :x: \u0026lt;I: LL. en .....I 0 C) C=\u0026gt; en C) \u0026lt;..:\u0026gt; :::,.c: en \u0026lt;I: .....I ::::\u0026gt; 0.... :E: 0.... (Y) \"1\" ,..., = 0:: LL. rcn I -i ....- ~ 0J I \u0026gt; C) :z: 0 -  - f\nUtUDL t:flU IC 1-: HV c,1u1c1=: -  I.EAi! oouao,e ~ f,Vl:.' f o,mft r i\" or1-ou () 10 fl/92 a, Countu L.aw 20 - U.5.C J?21F-1 == ~ I S~hool us Dep\u0026lt;1rtment r,f E:dut:,.tion .-, tirade Sp\n,n ._(!Q.,, FAf'D6 IU92 I- . :::_I - CL J. +------------------------------------------------------+NUMBER I I WHITE NOTI 0LACI~ NOTI f ASl\n\\N/f'AC. 1AM INDIAN I Df : I IIISPANIC I HISP/\\NlC I 1-!lSF'hNlC ' . ISLANDER IALASl'.AN lCLASSES Gr\n,de -+--------------------------------------------------------+---- ~ Total 1Boys1Girls1Bo~~Girls1Bo~s1Gi~1sl0o~~Girlsi0a~sGirlsl -  Pre-~i~di,r!la-rten Enrol l ...+,.- - --+ +---- ---- -- - -- -- ------ -- ----- ----- -- -- -- -- -- ---------- --+- -- - 721 ! 12t 21 I In 2.9_1 11 I I I I 1 I 4. 0 \"' +----+ 1------------------- ---------- ------ -------- e-\n-, ,. ' - 9'?,\n1\nY \u0026lt;:0 == e'' 1 == I CD = ci I :z: -- :x: \u0026lt;J: 4 LL. t  U) --l C\u0026gt; C\u0026gt; 4 :r C\u0026gt; U) C\u0026gt; t C\u0026gt; -~ { U) \u0026lt;J: --l - :=, CL (. -- ::c o.. (i N =-- \u0026lt;=:0  -n::: LL.  r--- CD I -  N I \u0026gt; 0 :z:  ( -- -- -- -- - - --  ./ LEA# flN~IUAL SCHOOL RE.PORT 6003002 PU~JL ENttOLLMENT UY SCHOUL tUNM - Uc~ubP1 1, ,~,. SCHOIJL CHOICE Il\"\u0026gt;' CHOICE - AOE Formtt Fin 09-00-010 R/92 0.:? -\n-~-_\n:~cc\n:..~:..n:..:o...c!c..1'--'------~~-.+-E\u0026lt;E+-+--4-~+-+-----------\"\"~'-'::..:w:..D......=c\nc::'-a-~-t\"\"'~'-'-~!/ o !~ ~! ~~--c-\"!-,-=:o-t:---n. -------------------------------------1  , Grade Span FAPD6 R /9-\n:!. +------------------------------------ ________ -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_+_~~IU~M.B~~E=R~--------------------I I ~J~UTE NOi I ULhCI-'. NOTI I ASIAN/PAC. IA~l INOJAN I o~   I HISPANIC I HISPANIC I HISPANIC I ISLANDEH I ALASI-IAN JCLA5SES qr.a cJe --- ------ - -- ------~----- -------------_-_--:-:,..-,..-----=-----_----_,.-._.--__--_-+__-_ -_--------------------------l Total IOoyslGirlslOn~s1Glrlslllo~slCirl~IDo~s1Girls1BoyslGirlsl +---+ +------ --- ------ ----------- --------------~-------------+--- P_r~e---\"~i_n_d_e_r-~g~a..= _nr~ t__ E_n~r_D_l~l-_1 5~3~1 1_ _ 1_2~1_ _ t 2 I 11 I 17 i 1 I +----I-- 1 - -- -- -------------------- ---- --- ----------- -------------- ---\" :\n,~\ni I ----------- -------------\u0026lt; .. cry co == == = c:5 :z: :x: \u0026lt;C LL U) -.I 0 0 = 0 U) 0 0 ::,c U) \u0026lt;C -.I = 0... :.:= 0... = cry = a:: LL r-= I N I \u0026gt; 0 :z:   6003012 Count Sctiool Grade Span ~  ,, 1 L L,.1\\.1.JLL.J 1L1.J ~ U , :Jt.HUUI_ ! UHM - Uc t ob e 1 l ~ 199 / SCHOOL CHOICE IlY CHOlCE - Ant: Forn,rt Fin 09-00-010 R/92 LdU! 20 - U S. C l2~I:-1 US Oepart.ment of Edu~c~a:-:\nt-,~.o-=-n------------------------------------FAPD6 R/92 +--- _________________________________ ---------------+~~u_MBER ____ _ H-------------------------,:--1:--:~7-cHITE NUfl l.lLACI'. NflTJ IASIAN/PAC. 1AM IN0II\\N I of ------------- 1 HIGPANIC I HISf'ANlt. I HI~,PANIC I IGLI\\N0ER IALASJ.\u0026lt;.AN !CLASSES \" ~ ,, ,\", ,. ,, :...., ,, i)  \" ~r: ., Grade Total +----+ +-. --------- - ---- ------------------ -- ------------------+---- 19o ~~I G i Pl 1B ay I Girls I Doy s I Girls! Boy ~s~l~C~li~-,s-~. ,~O~u-~~-.~~--or~~l-.s~~I--------------------------~ -~- --- ---- --- --- ---- --- -- ---------- - -- --- ---- ----- ---- -- --+- -- - Pre-Ki!_!! erg a r_t_.,_n_ _ E_n_r_o_l_l_*___f 3 _6 _1___ _.'.!J_ __ 7_1_ _! 3 r l 2 I I I_ ___ I _ 1 __ r 2. _ g__ ________ _ I------------ --- ---- --- ------ - -------- ---- ------ - - 1\\ a~ o K Gt Gr Gr Gr. = 0.. -.:::I\" (Y) = ~ LL. r-- CD I ~ I \u0026gt; 0 :z: /\\NtJUIIL SCHOOL HEPDRT LEA# Count!J 6003028 School Grade Span PUP l L ENflfJLLMFN ,- ltY SCI IOUL. ruHM - Oct nt, i.1 l, l 'I'} T rn:HCJDL CHOfCE UY CHOICC - ADE form Fin 09-00-010 R/92 Law 20 - U.S. C 1221-l US Department of Education FAPD6 l\u0026lt;/92 \"-4----------------1------------+_-_-_-_-_----------------------------------------------- ----+NUMUER I ~!HITE NTI DLACI', N  l l H1'.\nIAN/PAC. 11\"\\M INDI,,N I ~F-----------------------1 1 HISPANIC I HISPANIC J HISPANIC I ISLANDER !ALASKAN !CLASSES Grade +-----------------------------------------------:::--------,...-::-:-----:---_+:_-_-_-_- ____________________ ---Total IBoyslGirls!Oo~slGirlslOoyslGirlslBoyslGirlslDouslGirlsl +-- -- + +- --- ----- -------- - -- --- ------ ---- --- ---- - ----- - - -- -- --~---- ,...._. __ P_r~e~-_~\" Kn d erg a r_t,,__:.e.::_lc .. ...cE=-n:..:.:..r-=o:...:)____,1_, :_r_,.\n___,.:...r.~:.'-1-'4-'--''l7'-~--1\"\".-.2,_0Il 71 10 I I I l t I I 4. 0  ... ,. .., \" - G G1 H., Pe lax II +------.. r ----------------- --- -------- ------------------------------+ Cho\nrP-lHf 1 ~~ i7 6 - \u0026gt;1.7. DnJ/ 1/ 97 ~~~bs ~ 7671 Co. Phone~ -r 0 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 925 EAST DlxoN ROAD LrITLER OCKA, RKANSAS 72206 (501) 490-2000 Date: Time: To: .. From: Number of Pages (including cover sheet): ---=2r---~--- Message \\. Posr OmCE Box 8601 Lmu: ROCK, AR.KANSAS 72216 FAX (501) 490-0483 -D.E . C.-.0 3-W97E 0D2 :47P M PULASCKOIS CHOOLS FAXN O.4 900483 P. 02 SCHOOL CAPACITY INFORMATION PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT November 1 a, 1 997 HIGH SCHOOL Jacksonville Mills North Pulaski Oak Grove Jr-./Sr. Robinson Sylvan Hills JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL\u0026amp; Fuller . Jackso-nville North Jacksonvme South Northwood Robinson (.2-rooms devlded) Scott (Alternative Sch.) Sylvan Hills .EI..EMENTARV SCHOOL Adkins Arnold Drive Baker Bates Bayou Meto Cato Clinton College Station Crystal Hill Dupree Fuller Harris Jacksonville Landmark Lawson Oak Grove Oakbrooke Pine Forest Pinewood Robinson Scott Sherwood Sylvan HIiis Murrell Taylor Tolleson SCHOOL CAPACITY 1025 '780 900 93S 506 998 ~.OOL CAPACITY 945 BOO BOO 964 486 12S 925 SCHOOL CAPACl'l'V 370 420 330 768 660 576 833 340 820 465 526 S25 785 SGS 325 476 500 5S6 523 450 280 460 456 4S0 S70 PCSSD Ten Year Enrollment Comparison School 88-89 89-90 90-91 91-92 92-93 93-94 94-95 95-96 96-97 97-98 -White- 611 607 669 621 598 518 329 331 310 297 - - ~ - - - Other 10 8 8 7 10 5 4 11 4 ~ - - - - - - Total 736 755 802 755 735 685 424 444 422 413 f- - - % Blk 17 18 16 17 18 23 21 25 24 27 I Taylor Elem Black 112 107 ~13] 112 108 122 141 149 165 115 -- - - White 329 346 337 306 308 264 266 270 230 261 - - - -- - -- - ---- -- Other 2 I 5 4 2 2 I 2 I - - -- -- Total 441 455 468 423 420 388 409 420 397 417 t--- - ,...... c- - % Blk 25 24 28 26 26 31 34 35 42 37 Tolleson Elem Black 84 83 126 137 136 127 124 I 15 128 120 - - -- White - 457 442 426 418 425 405 374 429 402 347 - - - - - Other 27 - 14 111- 8 0 I 0 0 27 -- - - - Total 541 552 - 566 566 569 532 499 544 530 494 - - -f- - % Blk 16 15 22 24 24 24 25 21 24 24 Suh Total - Elem Black 3,231 3,201 3,134 3,111 3,471 3,436 3,642 3,726 3,693 3,621 White J - -- 9,022 8,729. 8,774 8,679 8,824 7,992 7,752 7,715 7,443 7,028 + Other 125 92 89 115 75 147 121 141 183 Total 12,253 12,055 ___g,_o1o1,:8~7 9 r 12,410t 11,503 __! 1,541 11,562 11,277 t - t---- 10,832 $ Blk 26 27 26 26 28 30 32 32 33 33 Alternative - Sec. Black I l 16 17 16 16 22 21 -,_ -- t f----- Oponod for 1992-93 school White - 50 48 39 31 26- 27 yoar. f Other I - 0 0 0 0 I 0 661 - Total 65 *55 *47 *49 48 + % Blk 24 26 29 34 45 44 Fuller Jr. Black 375 398t 404 411 4251 410 424 ~~t 384 381 (includes a specialty t White 452 t 462 428 440 497 j 485 446 467 program) Other 5 5 12 13 9 13 - 13 Total 827 865 837 863 935 9 918 883 843 861 ' - % Blk 45 46 48 48 45 43 46 49 46 44 I Jacksonville Jr. North Black 128 142j 181 172 184 182 j 195 201 244 t 257 Re-organized h.:ginning White 439 463 534 444 458 401 414 434 399 477 with 1997-98: became a middk school: indudcd Other 10 15 10 12 II IO 0 10 7 grades 6-8. Total 567t 6151 730 626 j 654 594 619 635 t 653 i 741 t - % Blk 23 23 25 27 28 31 32 32 37 35 Jacksonville Jr. South Black 174 166 156 180 202 202 186 181 I 200 f 307 ' 1 White 486 444 420 403 381 355 338 323 318 453 Other 10-'-- 10 1 17 19 9 10 8 11 1 15 --- I rl //,-r .e\nJ., ('::\u0026gt; y (:J,v .:fl/~- p37- /~/~ ('.t\u0026gt;,,J I\"- 0 --%~\n ~l(\u0026lt;:.-f 77-01 LITTLE ROCK District LEA Number FAPD NO. 38 1.9.9h.91!. SCHOOL YEAR 10/23/97 Qrtr Ending Date 11/21/97 Date Submitted ~Q=r=t=r-\\=umb=-e-r~_REC~~~a~dent M. to M TRANSFERS SUPERINTENDENT'S QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE. REPORT, K12 ADT - ADA - ADM SEP 11 1998 TELEPHONE NUMBER_324::2.QQ0_ OFFIOCFE DESEGREMGOANTIIOTOHR J!m This report is due within fiftren (15) days after the end of each quarter (Ark.Code Ann. 6-18-213). Send one copy to the office of Local Fiscal Services, #4 State Capitol Mall, Room 202-A, Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 and o-e copy to the County Board of Education. Each quarter is to be no less than 40 and no more than 50 days. I  1 ~jg.( n columns 2 thcu 14 should Days ~ to me nearest whole number in Qrtr C. Resident pupils sent t9 :Jther district(s) under .\"M to 1'l\" transfers List District s LEO.# North Little Rock Pulaski County Special Pulaski County Special P-4 D. Total C of columns 12, 3, 14. These ! ,. I *T 3,810 2,673 will be used for State Ecualization Aid purposes 7. E. Non-Resident pupils rec::ived from other district(s) under \"M to for' transfers List District/sl ~ North Little Rock I 45 j Pulaski County Special I 45 i \nPulaski County Special P-4 I 45 ! H. Number of kindergarten pupls enrolled this quarter' I I I 1 I A I .:\nI KINDEiRGART~N I f\"\\e:i- in/\\ Days I 10Absent I Total Total *NT Col 2+3 T+NT 3,810 168 2,673 98 90 I 90 I 7 I 1,524 1 1,524 I 62 I 1,625 I 1,625 I 95 I Full-Time.~4~_4_ _ f\nI 7 I 0 I n 1t\\ I 11 I p i n I ,a I GRADES 1 -12 COMBl['JED TOTAL ADM Days in Attendance Days GRADES K-12 Total l *I\\IT_-, 7otal Absent Total ADT ADA I ADM Col 4+5 Columns Total Col 9+10 Col 2+7 Col 4+9 Col 4+5+ ..: Col 1 *T 7+8 T+NT .o Col,1 .oCol 1 .oCol 1 9+10...:Col 1 I I I 4,009 I 4,009 278 I 100 93 1 100 88 I~ -4Maa-! ~, 1\n'!M- ...,440---1 ..1.-=- 62 I I I tit/IC./ l/81CI ,Z//0 /117 . //.55 2 I I 1,612 I 1,612 ! 111 I 38\ni 38 I 40 35 I I 15,751 I 15,751 i 633 I 364 ! 384 I 399 38 I I I i I I I Half-time _____ _ Additional instructions on back FIN-09-00-005 5/91 SCHOOL CAPACITY INFORMATION PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT November 1 a, 1 997 HIGH SCHOOL Jacksonville Mills North Pulaski Oak Grove Jr./Sr. Robinson Sylvan Hills JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Fuller Jacksonville North Jacksonville South Northwood Robinson (2-rooms devlded) Scott (Alternative Sch.) Sylvan Hills ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Adkins Arnold Drive Baker Bates Bayou Melo Cato Clinton College Station Crystal Hill Dupree Fuller Harris Jacksonville Landmark Lawson Oak Grove Oakbrooke Pine Forest Pinewood Robinson Scott Sherwood Sylvan Hills Murrell Taylor Tolleson SCHOOL CAPACITY 1025 780 900 935 506 998 SCHOOL CAPACITY 945 800 800 964 486 125 925 SCHOOL CAPACITY 370 420 330 768 660 576 833 340 820 465 526 525 785 568 325 476 500 556 523 450 280 460 456 450 570\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_833","title":"Budget: ''North Little Rock School District Budget''","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1996/1997"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational statistics","School buildings","School employees","School facilities"],"dcterms_title":["Budget: ''North Little Rock School District Budget''"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/833"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nNORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT . . .. BUDGET 1996-97 RE AUG8 1996 Officeo f DesegregatiMono mtorm13 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1996-97 ANNUAL BUDGET TABLE OF CONTENTS Board of Directors, Superintendent and Assistant Superintendents ..................................................................................... 1 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES Revenue Graph ................................................................................................................. 2 Expenditure Graph ............................................................................................................ 3 Revenue and Expenditures - Operating, Capital Outlay, Building/Bond, and Federal Programs .......................................................................... 4 Revenue - Operating Budget .............................................................................................. 5 Expenditures - Operating Budget ....................................................................................... 6 Revenue and Expenditures - Federal Progarns .................................................................... 7 EXPENDITURES FOR SALARY, OPERATIONS AND DEBT SERVICE FUNDS Expenditures by Function .................................................................................................. 8 Expenditures by Object ..................................................................................................... 14 Expenditures by Function/Object ...................................................................................... 18 EXPENDITURES FOR FEDERAL PROGRAMS Expenditures by Function ................................................................................................. 65 Expenditures by Object .................................................................................................... 67 Expenditures by Function/Object ..................................................................................... 69 SALARY SCHEDULES ................................................................................................. 85 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1L P P7 ,t. (la,. BOARD OF EDUCATION Teresa Burl, President Larry Shadid, Vice President Louella Thomas, Secretary Pat Blackstone Lynn Hamilton Mable Mitchell James R. Smith, Superintendent Assistant Superintendents Bobby Acklin - Desegregation Donald Watkins - Business Services c., 7 )p_ G, ),- I#- (,..rf 4- /~v. ( --?!~. ., fr~ \" ~ ,,..d,t. l REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT REVENUE STATE REVENUE $26,240,600 55% 1996-1997 LOCAL REVENUE $18,194,770 38% FEDERAL REVENUE $3,418,900 7% TOTAL REVENUE = $47,854,270 -2- NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT EXPENDITURES 1996-1997 SALA RI ES $31,350,480 BENEFITS $8,532,770 DEBT SERVICE $1,215,110 INSURANCE/OTHER $678,310 CAPITAL OUTLAY $1,762,480 SUPPLIES $1,499,780 SERVICES $2,577,860 TUITION $1,305,000 TOTAL EXPENDITURES = $48,921,790 -3- NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES 1993-1997 OPERATING BUDGET SALARIES (01), OPERATING (02), \u0026amp; DEBT SERVICE (Q.4) TOTAL REVENUE AND BALANCE EXPENDITURES - - Salarfea Benema Tuition Service, _ ~pllea ~ulpment _ Insurance/Other Debt Service TOTAL EXPENDITURES ENDING BALANCE --- -- - ----- ___ FEDERAL PROGRAM~6} TOTAL REVENUE AND BALANCE E.XPENDITUREr- - - -- Salaries Benefft --=Se-rvice S!!J\u0026gt;plln - =-=-=-- E9!, JI men! Other TOTA_L_EX_P~E-Noffi.JRE~ --- ENDING BALANCE BEGINNING BALANCE REVENUE CAPITAL OUTLAY 05 EXPENDITURE_S_ ___________ - ENDING BALANCE BUILDING (03 /BOND (10) FUNDS BEGINNING BALANCES - - - - - REVENUE -- - - -- - EXPENDITURES -- --- -- - ENDING BAL.ANCE --- --- --- 1993-:-94- ACTUAL. $3~953,926.8!_ - $26,962\n-f00.71 $2,841,125.27 $1,229,399.42 $2,420,129.61 $1,379,589:'fQ -$164,833.43 -$38,320:48 1,188,769.94 -$36,224,356.65 7729,570.1[ - -1994-95- - 1995-96 -- ACTUAL - - BUDGETED $38,287,118.13 - $38,746,676.00 - $27\nij63,295.15 - $28,555,600.00 =-$3,25 8,713.98 j3,315,200.00 $1,239,950.00 ~ 11,240,000.00 $2,266,654.22 $2,217,960.00 - l1 ,356,006.55 - $1,377,470.00 $132,412.08 $97,280.00 $221,482.63 $245,610.00 $1,102,578.74 $1,304,410.00 $37,441,093.35 $38,353,530.00 ~ $846,024.78 =1_393, 146.00 1995-96 1996-97 1995-96 ACTUAL BUDGETED CHANGE $39,109,791.07 $43,990,918.00 $4,881,126.93 $28,750,016.88 ,$29, 119,896.00 $369,879.12 $3,240,795.73 7,846,404.00 $4,605,608.27 $1,243,319.72 1,305,000.00 $61,680.28 $2,143,714.59 2,255,079.00 ! 111,364.41 $1,384,132.52 1,284,883.00 :599,249.52 $85,603.93 $235,035.00 149,431.07 $279,101.77 $625,055.00 345,953.23 $1,270,530.89 $1,215,110.00 :s55,420.89 $38,397,216.03 $43,886,462.00 $5,489,245.97 $712,575.04 $104,456.00 ($608,11~ n:961.032.83 $2.022.se6.80 s1.991,520.oo 7Dl'i5,512.so 2,23o,se5.oo 315,012.so }~~-~f?_]~ f585,991.45 ffi3,460.00 534,894.52 686,368.00 151\n.ITTa $421,038.73 $416,207.75 $371,960.00 400,424.81 $322,780.00 77,644.81 $205,874.02 $171,185.15 $177,940.00 $200,802.39 $218,905.00 $18,102.61 l11s,14o.3o l188,975.14 --Seo,425.oo 71,642.43 52,450.oo \u0026lt; 19,192.43 ffi.626.02 s12,494.75 140,400.00 $44,401.86 $53,255.oo ---ro's3.14 $3,290,429.58 $3,377,441.04 $3,231,795.00 $3,167,678.51 $3,564,343.00 $396,664.49 --$3os,ii63.ee -\"lill,683.74 l3tJii3.oo - ~26,205.83 --R,49.00 \u0026lt; 221,456.83 --~--- ---~ l34,828.03 $1,882.64 ffi,840.00 $389,503.75 ffl4,080.73 $1,139,600.00 --S 1422,449.14 l101,122.98 l1,1s9,ooo.oo _ _$1.~~-~ _ $24,840.39 _ ~~40.00 _ 122,186.69 $267,231.00 $245,044.31 1,138,803.61 $1,233,000.00 $94,196.39 $893,758.89 s1 ,475,ooo.oo $581,241.11 $267,231.41 $25,231.00 ($242,000.41' $1,321,.829.651 $79,533.42 $417,800.93 $9~3,472-1~ - --- i-- -- -ri1 ___ - -- - --l $983,472.00 $983,472.14 $3,598,112.00 $2,614,839.86 $3,300,000.00 13,462,492: 11 $131,000.00 {13,331,492.11 $3,225,000.00 $847,852.24 $2,393,974.00 $1,546,121.76 $1,058,472.00 _ $3,598,112.01 $1,335,138.00 _($2,262,974.01 -4- NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT REVENUE OPERATING BUDGET SAI.Al{Y (01), or:RA IIN(\n(02), \u0026amp; l\u0026gt;EB I s,m,n\n(0~, BEGINNING BALANCE REVENUE, LOCAL - Propert_r Taxes 40% Pullback 40% P~llback {Accrued) Delln\u0026lt;J!lenTt !!(.!S Eileen Commlulons Land f!ed~'!!J\u0026gt;Jlon- Tuition - Summer School Interest -- - PupU Actl~y Salas __ Rent and Mlscellaneou1 Desegregation - Sec. vm:C:LR _ --+=Dc-=ce~atlon.:. Sec. VIII.C - PCSSD Tuition - PCSSD CountiGeneralanciseverance Tax TOTAL LOCAL REVENUE REVENUE, STATE -- - - - - --MFP~ - -- Workers' Com nsatlon Transportation Aid/Debt Service- M-to-M Incentive c--~- C~naato Education ___ _ Special Ejucatlon Su~rvtsor Act 591 Residential S-Tai Education Preschool VocatlonalEducatlon A.BeP reschool --- - -- Desegregation -sec. ViIT:e __ p~~allon - Sec. VIII.C /Lakeside/Gen Facll!!las Megnet/M-to-M Trans rtatlon Other State 1----1Publlclaw 9=7\"\"'4_=ao_=nt.h.,e.dr TOTAL STATE A~N=D~U~N~R=E=s=TF=ERD~E1RcA=TL=-REE=VDE NUE 1993-1997 1993-94 ACTUAL $1,664,962:QO $8,514,794.30 $8,519, 142:54 -19, 95-96- GETED- --- 85(!,QQQ..OO 359,000.00 $3,289,950.09 _ }3,87!,!I!~~ 14, 000,000.00 -$soo\ntoo.e1 $994,735.19 -r 875,000.00 t1 ,2Q3,584. !!I _ 11,0~8,iITiUis =-$1, $30,561.43 $31,760.13 050,000.00 $30,000.00 $102,947.89 $108,438.36 $ 100,000.00 $91,076.02 $103,522.25 -- m.000.00 $119,250.61 $183,818.62 $ 110,000.00 - $55,259.04 - $58,036.05 - $ 55,000.00 $126,125.88 - $147,324.48 - $110033,.0 00.00 l2ii3,882AO __ 360,806.72 $ $94,620.79 $120,268.90 155,750.00 $51,920:00 $117,254.41 _ $130,367.43 _ $ $35,369.94 $49,731.43 120,000.00 $32,465.00 $14,934,057.87 $15,724,655.18 $1~ 1~:135.00 $16,733:031.00 _ $17,951,462.00 $138,524.10 . $537,899.00 --- $585,122.00 $1,034,620.00 $1,065,124.00 $382,057.01 -- $311,598.01 S67,150.oo $67,150.oo $41,246.75 - $35,029.81 $321,255.00 $339,586,00 S24,602.34 $27,842.84 $234,116.00 l234:m.oo S3a9:02s.oo - $389,025.oo $57,082.32 $135,137.65 $271,430.00 $275,000.00 $11:7,074~!_ _!172,750.0Q 725,665.oo __ s12,eoe.43 $2~.2972 !_54.~ s21,eoo,015.B4 - - - - 135,100.00 140,000.00 585,000.00 100,000.00 270,000.00 87,150.00 $35,000.00 ! 356,000.00 $2 $3 S18,000:0o 2R116.oo 389,025.00 - $0.00 - $22 75,000.00 =-s s2f, 40,000.00 $71,150.00 7_15,541.~0_ --- 1995-96 ACTUAL - --$570,359.87 -$9,446,843.59 -14,294,482.69 $258,063.82 $1,170,364.36 $37,087.35 $51,812.32 --$113,487.50 _1162,849.21 --S66,316.oo $168,566.82 --$155,753.39 ---$51 ,917.81 $143,872.76 136,987.54 -m: 158,405.16 $18,149,686.73 --~s:,19,888.48 -,586,253.00 7-1,120,850.00 -$125, 100.00 --$67:150.00 -- S32,304.76 S408, 195.oo --$17,662.50 --$234,116.00 -- S389,025.oo --1168~93.00 $344,446.59 - $453,065.99 --S104,788.99 - ffi,381,026.04 ------- 1996-97 1996-97 - BUDGETED CHANGE v12,575.oo $142,215.13 $10,175,600.00 ---m8,756.41 $4,500,000.00 $205,517.31 $485,800.00 $227,736.18 $1,100,000.00 S70,364.36 $35,000.00 {$2,087.35 $50,000.00 {$1,812.32 $114,800.00 $1,312.50 $110,000.00 $52,849.21 $55,000.00 $11,316.00 $133,500.00 $35,066:\u0026amp;2 so.oo n 155,753.39 so.oo :S51,917 .81 $170,000.00 $26,127.24 -m,055.00 {$4,932.54 s-fe,961,755.oo $803,349.84 $23,335,255.00 nlluoo.oo $5,185,561!~ (S48,088.48 $193,610.00 ($392,643.00 ~11,200,000.00 $79,150.00 $0.00 ($125,100.00 --S67, 150 .00 $0.00 $35,000.00 $2,695.24 S440,000.00 $31,805.00 -~9,770.00 $22,107.50 - S234, 116.oo $0.00 ----.o.oo -=-:]!389,025.00, $173,775.00 $5,282.00 ~69.H2lio -- $24,665.41 -,21 :000.00 _JS432,065.99 - $76,000.00 - -- s {S28,788.99 $26.3!~,588.0Q - 3,935:siH.96 ----- - LO~i:\n-coUNTY,STATtAND ~N~ESTRICTl\nQ FEDERAL REVENUE ___ _ J[ $~.~31,212.50 c ~r.s24-\n731 .-o::ur-137, 1 -Js7 ,7~.3t [--~~-~rn.-~t- ~~~.~~:Oof3~.S3ffl'r.20ll$~~I~~-QQ]L~_ li.138.911@1 TRANSFERS7NON-RE7ENOEltECEIPTS-- RAlm TOTALREVENUE,-fmlil-REVENU-, - -- -- L~~ ANQJ+ OR -1 JRANSFERS ____ _ ~-- __ ~ lr $3M~3.~2~.!!1Jr:_J3.!l,~!,11!UH _,~a. ,~n.\u0026lt;r~-~o[ ::._::__ :-_~- [ -.- ------ -[-- --su:oo - - - - --- --- ------- t16,1~I!!- 1~09 ?!!J].t nrn,!190.~8.QQ.r-- I\":ID:l~-~31 -5- OPERATING BUDGET SALARY (01), OPERATING (02), \u0026amp; DEBT SERVICE TOTAL REVENUE AND BALANCES SALARY FUND EXPENDITURES ADMINISTRATORS TEACHERS SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS TOTAL CERTIFIED SALARIES FRINGE BENEFITS TUITION - - fOTAl SALARY FUND EXPENDITURES OPERATING FUND EXPENDITURES - - - - - REGULAR PROGRAMS- SPEclAL EDUCATION VOCATIONAL EDUCATION COMPENSATORY EDUCATION OTHER INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMS - PUPIL SUPPORT STAFF SUPPORT - ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT PRINCIPAI:8 OFFI~ - BUSINESS SUPPORT CENTRAL SUPPORT------ - -- OTHER SUPPORT - - -NON- BOND/NON-PROGRAM/COMMUNITY TOTAL OPERATING FUND EXPENDITURES DEBT SERVICE FUND EXPENDITURES PRINCIPAL INTEREST __ _ 1----i=rscAL FEES ----- 1----1 TOT CDEBTSERVICE EXPENDITURES-TOTAL SALARY, OPERATING AND DEBT SERVICE FUNDS EXPENDITURES ENDING BALANCES NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT EXPENDITURES 1993-94 ACTUAL $36,953,926.!1 $2,790,319.05 $18,069,269.74 --$378,002.30 $2(237,591.09 $537,924. if - $1,179,221.54 $22\n{1547, 3714 $1,860,739.59 $440~823.23 $271, 186.29 mo,763.62 le2:1ano -$635,801.50 $i10,ssl16 $445,226.59 - $709,199.75 $5-\n445,349.38 $212,485.65 $250,598.39 - 15,361.93 $12,080,849.38 _ $~,224,356.~ 1993-1997 1094-95- ------:, 995.96 -ACTUAL BUDGETED j~~.287,1}!1! $39,182,425.00 $2,851,452.52 $2,931,50-0.00- $18,369,424.17 $18,444\n100.oo -$353,107.00 -$349,000:00 $21~573,983.69 -$21,724,800.00 ---S54s\n350.TI -$555,695.00 $1\n238,905.10 $1,475,700.00 $23,359,238.92 $23,755,995.00 ----- -$2,206,078.6'1 ---S2,403, 794. 00 -$498,092.10 -~935.00 $253,662.61 -- $223,956.00 - $791,41[82 -- $468,849.00 -- $196,119.24 -$302,845:00 - $769,207:ef -$832,936.00 - $936,133.90 - $1,007,893.00 -$436,578.99 ~49,070.00 - -fj56,067.32 fff2.193.00 - $5,599,805.80 _!5,681, 913.00 ~eo\na11.21 ~268,320.00 ~64. 150.88 -$287,460.00 --STT\n591. 96 !13,500.00 $12\n979,275.91 $13,37l\n664.00 --- -$460:S34.18 $588,499.00 --,638,210.06 --,712,879.00 !3,834.50 -= $1,102\n518.74 _!5,030.00 -$1,304,408.00 -- --- $37,~41,093.57 _ $38,~32i.Q67.0(f 1995-96 1996-97 ACTUAL BUDGETED ~: 109,790.07 $43,990,918.00 ~.995,952.82 $2,754,750.00 ~8,619,753.97 $19,758 790.00 ~-$333,807.20 $339,000.00 $21,949,513.99 $22,852,540.00 $541,676.14 $1,333,962.00 .!1,243,319.72 $1,305,000.00 -ua, 734,509.85 $25,491,502.00 $2,535,719.84 $4,181,174.00 $558,058.78 $1,109,549.00 $199,198.91 $314,736.00 $428 931.76 S353,827.00 $368,522.19 $366,316.00 ---S1,056,578.05 $1,139,578.00 ~$882,951.51 $1,241,992.00 -$359,681.24 5477, 107.00 $781,347.84 $1,058,352.00 $5,667,570.61 $6,073,590.00 $275,972.92 $307,102.00 $255 344.47 5343 217.00 $22,297.39 T21s1.0l.0 0 $13,392,175.29 $17,179,648.00 $602,008.22 $472,180.00 ~7,439.43 $737,933.00 S1,083.24 _!5,200.00 ~ 270,530.89 S1,215,313.00 -- - -$38\n-397,216.03 [E3\n886\n4~3.oo '1996-97 CHANGE $4,881,127.93 ($241,202.82 S1 139,038.03 $5,192.80 $903,026.01 $792,285.86 561,680.28 $1,756,992.15 S1 ,845,454.36 $551,490.24 $115,53~,2! !S75, 104.78 ($2,206.19 S82,997.95 $359,040.49 S117 425.78 $275,004.18 $406,019.39 S31, 129.08 S87 872.53 $192,812.61 S3, 787,472.71 !S129,828.22 S70,493.57 $4, 110:10 !S55,21~ - -: $5,489,246.97 - $72~,5701~ - $-983,4-72.1-4 -- - $7-5--0--,-3-5 8.00 ----$- 712,57--4--.-04 -- f-1--04,455-.00 ~08, 11---9.04' -6- NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES 1993-1997 FEDERAL GRANTS 1993-94 1 994-95 1995-96 - 1995-96 1996-97 1995-96 BEGINN NG BALANCES REVEN E - EVENSTART CHAPTER 1- CHAPTER 2 -MEDICAID-SP EDPRESCHOOL {SECTION619 AND ECCL HEAD START TITLE VI-~ - - - - P.L 89-313 - - - HOMELESS ASSISTANCE JTPA CAR~L-P-E~R~KVl~ONC-SA TioNALAI D - - EISENHOWER MATH/SCIENCE RUG ABUSE PREVENTiON EXXON E ERGY ---- - OTHER f----~r=orALR=Ev=E=N~u=E,._---- TOTAL EDERAL REVENUE AND BALANCE ACTUAL A CTUAL BUDGETED ACTUAL BUDGETED CHANGE -,r-~Q\n0~.99 -$3 305,663.96 $282,683.00 $254,363.39 $226,206.00 ($28,157.39 $116,100.00 $116,100.00 $79 320.00 $152,880.00 $73,560.00 ,842,953.00 __!!,623,000.00 $1,665,577.00 $1,791,475.00 $125,898.00 $59,791.00 $77,588.00 $77,558.00 $59,029.00 (: 18,529.00 $46,644.88 l5o,ooo.oo $107,252.43 $91,000.00 (: 16,252.43 $474,913.00 S-444,899.00 $449,899.00 S479,900.00 30,001.00 8,181.00 $58,410.00 $58,410.00 $55,000.00 $3,410.00 $345,162.00 $353,100.00 $359,200.00 $374,010.00 14,810.00 $16,818.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 18,539.00 $17 000.00 $22,399.00 $22,000.00 ($399.00 $99,305.50 $0.00 $15,130.48 $9,792.00 ($5,338.48 $147,209.00 --,140,043.00 $140,043.00 $143,300.00 $3,257.00 $51,216.00 $51,205.00 '47,659.00 $48,000.00 $341.00 $54,494.00 1-- $40,000.00 77,124.00 $66,500.00 $10,624.00 33,048.00 $14,950.00 14,950.00 $0.00 $14,950.00 25,000.00 $50,000.00 $25,000.00 ,354,374.38 S2 986,295.00 $3 139,521.91 $3 342 886.00 $203,364.09 ,660:038.34 r-l3,268,978.00 $3 393,885.30 $3 569 092.00 $175 206.70 $18,165.28 $10,500.00 $0.00 $0.00 l5o5\na72li4 --Ss52,224.oo ~70,548.34 $515,615.00. $45,066.86 $162,605.77 -- $731.00 -$140,043.00 $139,219.00 ($824.00 , 773,682.40 $1,640,422.00 $1,548,387.33 $1,692,341.00 143,953.67 $14,710.88 ---. $0.00 $79,267.91 $60,382.00 $18,885.91 1468.972.76 --$295,176.00 '$483,963.56 -\"$452,355.00 $'31,608.56 $349,019.70 $470,718.00 $345,573.79 $603,423.00 -257,849.21 $42,286.04 $11,000.00 $25,084.48 $28,550.00 $3,465.52 $17\n'/50.35 ,-$14,400.00 $8,073.00 !5, 100.00 ~$2,973.00 $33,755.44 m:a86.00 $39,213.01 -$28,588.0010,625.01 $18,853.39 ~26\n982.00 --\"$27,524.09 $38,770.00 $11,245.91 ,405,674.95 $3,062,039.00 ~.167,678.51 0\n564,343.00 :5_396,664.49 }254,363.39 ~-=-:J206,939.00 -$226,206.79 _ $1,749.00 '7$221,457,?~ -7- EXPENDITURES BY FUNCTION\nOBJECT\nAND FUNCTION/OBJECT FOR SALARY (01) OPERATING (02) AND DEBT SERVICE (04) North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function Funds: Salary (OJ)\nOperating (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fund Fnct Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 01 l000 INSTRUCTION 0.00 11,857.62 15,000.00 10,924.33 15,000.00 02 1000 INSTRUCTION 0.00 0.00 8,451.00 7,620.22 0.00 02 1104 K-5 REMEDIATION 0.00 0.00 212,942.00 8,201.37 123,195.00 02 1105 IPRESCHOOL 170,817.77 122,192.41 l--l9,455.00 107,143.51 144,515.00 01 1110 I KINDERGARTEN 1,084,841.48 1,157,672.93 1,204,647.00 1.204,646.04 1,309,605.00 02 1110 KINDERGARTEN 98,542.71 107,420.26 107,127.00 105,006.91 268,286.00 01 1120 ELEMENTARY 5,352,864.41 5,216,809.35 5,352,924.70 5,331,458.49 5,668,435.00 02 1120 ELEMENTARY 559,819.76 624,057.84 734,316.00 718.398.56 1,413,177.00 02 1121 ELEMENTARY MUSIC 4,285.45 1,973.87 7,970.00 2,137.38 800.00 02 1123 MA THE1v!AT ICS 0.00 14,625.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1124 SCIENCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1126 CRUSADES 0.00 0.00 2,826.00 2,689.82 16,000.00 01 1130 MIDDLE SCHOOL 2,354,532.83 2,332,390.81 2,I06,I93.15 2.106, 192.35 2,280,363.00 02 1130 1vUDDLE SCHOOL I 296,486.86 311,421.98 428,360.00 411,558.55 697,544.00 I 02 1131 MUSIC 8,805.50 11,450.31 1,760.00 948.50 1,765.001 02 1132 LANGUAGE ARTS 1,139.79 934.85 1,767.00 1,704.81 1,335.00 02 1133 MATHEMATICS 6,548.26 1,914.59 1,891.00 1,487.69 1,245.00 02 1134 SCIENCE 2,303.78 2,638.19 1,726.00 1,724.54 1,650.00 02 1135 SOCIAL STUDIES 1,056.22 871.38 974.00 922.03 1,070.00 02 1136 SPEECH \u0026amp; DRAMA 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1137 ART 1,483.84 3,648.32 3,148.00 3, I 35.63 2,200.00 02 1139 PHYSICAL EDUCATION 387.13 824.90 1,661.00 1.649.23 1,025.00 01 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 3,679,926.22 3,793,052.15 3,853,626.00 3,853.624.27 4,274,402.00 02 1140 HIGH SCHOOL 410.072.03 505,270.29 654,022.00 642,632.75 1,159,161.00 02 1141 jMUSIC 19,237.04 16,707.68 2,155.00 2,149.76 3,150.00 02 1142 LANGUAGE ARTS 1,036.71 1,644.67 1,950.00 1,925.79 1,750.00 02 1143 MATHEMATICS 863.68 1,730.82 1,325.00 1,200.90 4,600.00 02 1144 SCIENCE 3,045.56 7,527.70 7,590.00 5,443.02 6,500.00 02 1145 SOCIAL STUDIES 1,387.56 1.515.80 1,745.00 1,713.57 1,450.00 02 1146 SPEECH AND DRAMA 0.00 88. 10 300.00 237.23 250.00 02 1147 ART 2,687.48 647.38 2,070.00 1,767.62 1,800.00 02 1149 PHYSICAL EDUCATION 416.10 487.69 275.00 271.13 400.00 02 1150 ATHLETICS 21,993.61 5,576.70 1,341.00 1,340.29 1,565.00 02 1151 BOYS ATHLETICS 48,428.68 49,672.17 58,979.00 52,832.93 58,800.00 02 1152 GIRLS ATHLETICS 14,532.51 19,802.80 23,622.00 21,835.17 25,400.00 02 1153 COMBINED ATHLETICS 16,304.51 18,815.44 25,975.00 24,998.27 t 22,800.00 Page: 8 North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function Funds: Salary (01), Operatinl! (02), Debt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fund Fnct Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 1154 GIRLS SOFTBALL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1160 STUDENT ACTIVITrES 7,051.09 889.40 9,810.00 6,912.46 2,750.00 02 1161 CHEER 11,786.45 6,225.99 565.00 563.37 4,000.00 02 1162 DRILL 0.00 6,803.99 0.00 0.00 2,200.00 02 1165 BAND 0.00 0.00 20,966.78 20,673.27 21,003.00 02 1166 CHOIR 0.00 593.76 4,231.29 4,270.42 5,530.00 02 1191 SUMMER SCHOOL 93,393.39 255,088.61 318,247.00 268,689.85 64,545.00 02 1192 DRIVER EDUCATION 19,315.86 21,611.61 40,864.00 21,250.34 19,613.00 02 1193 MINI GRANTS 4,494.03 4,585.06 5.331.07,  ,681.30 5,000.00 02 1194 ACT~SATSUMMERSCHOOL 27,905.27 35,906.77 73,914.00 34,910.80 39,373.00 02 1195 SATURDAY DETENTION 5,110.96 4,620.20 8,099.00 4,482.91 5,110.00 01 1199 JROTC INSTRUCTOR 0.00 74,845.42 76,063.00 76,062.46 82,298.00 02 1199 JROTC INSTRUCTOR 0.00 36,291.49 36,621.00 36,607.74 50,617.00 02 1200  0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 1210 ITINERANT/HOME BOUND 78,925.33 93,483.12 131,088.00 131,087.56 136,132.00 02 1210 ITINERANT/HOME BOUND 7,995.42 8,018.66 13,773.00 13,478.44 30,110.00 01 1212 ITINERANT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 35,597.00 02 1212 ITINERANT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,852.00 01 1215 VISION IMPAIRED 0.00 26,043.96 28,662.00 28,661.88 31,313.00 02 1215 VISION IMPAIRED 0.00 2,163.94 2,334.00 2,333.76 5,972.00 01 1220 RESOURCE ROOM 1,535,149.75 1,908,256.00 1,968,471.00 1,947,424.09 2,167,606.00 02 1220 RESOURCE ROOM 116,962.39 159,613.16 192,628.70 182,042.42 460,611.00 01 1240 SPECIAL CLASS 1: 10/BA 529,506.64 375,754.39 476,803.00 476,251.37 745,417.00 02 1240 SPECIAL CLASS 1: I 0/BA 57,708.52 79,040.09 97,226.00 89,648.42 328,550.00 02 1241 ADAPTIVE PE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250.00 01 1250 SPECIAL CLASS, I :6 179,976.77 90,131.85 120,379.00 92,818.34 0.00 02 1250 SPECIAL CLASS, 1 :6 29,362.68 23,964.83 7,589.00 7,586.75 0.00 01 1260 PRIVATE DAY SCHOOL 63,001.89 I 34,879.95 133,817.00 133,816.39 150,000.00 02 1260 PRIVATE DAY SCHOOL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1271 ACT 591 HANDICAPPED, RES! 11,066.61 12,051.54 15,315.00 13,298.67 10,765.00 02 1272 ACT 591, NON-HANDICAPPED 30,291.27 23,008.67 19,685.00 18,998.10 24,235.00 01 1280 PUBLIC DAY SCHOOL 136,403.28 154,081.04 93,437.00 93,436.32 0.00 02 1280 PUBLIC DAY SCHOOL 13,080.51 17,969.60 18,057.00 15,862.99 0.00 02 1285 BARING CROSS WORK PROGRAM 12,489.12 14,393.61 I 1,901.00 11,900.82 16,105.00 02 1290 EARLY CHILDHOOD, HANDICAP 161,866.71 157,867.98 197,379.00 202,908.39 226,099.00 01 1320 DISTRIBUTIVE EDUCATION 86,127.89 44,764.32 45,375.00 45,332.10 48,864.00 Page: 9 North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function Funds: Salary (OJ), Operating (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fund Fnct Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 1320 DISTRIBUTIVE EDUCATION 10,733.83 5,416.72 5,829.00 5,827.71 10,012.00 01 1330 BUSINESS EDUCATION 391,647.97 409,517.76 352,956.00 352,802.57 407,728.00 02 1330 BUSINESS EDUCATION 66,084.40 95,956.86 74,734.00 73,291.62 102,429.00 01 1350 TRADE AND INDUSTRIAL 278,527.46 238,423.78 172.269.00 172,225.55 185,738.00 02 1350 TRADE AND INDUSTRIAL 67,949.63 40,187.65 22,318.00 21,922.06 61,486.00 01 1352 PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOLOGY 67,499.54 69,801.48 76,231.00 74,846.44 81,443.00 02 1352 PRINCIPLES OF TECHNOLOGY 6,026.53 6,562.25 7,635.00 7,548.51 17,777.00 02 1355 TELEVISION PRODUCTION 0.00 12,872.96 25,000.00 23,922.60 350.00 01 1360 HOME EC 282,091.81 295,346.14 173,472.00 172,711.18 212,194.00 02 1360 HOME EC 39,782.80 38,039.87 21,876.00 21,480.21 44,643.00 01 1370 CAREER ORIENTATION 53,913.34 78,639.47 92,878.00 89,787.45 120,046.00 02 1370 CAREER ORIENT A TION 6,264.81 12,857.78 9,181.00 8,992.82 24,857.00 02 1380 WORKPLACE READINESS 4,546.77 316.35 253.00 252.31 250.00 01 1390 SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION 350,815.36 345,306.96 338,963.00 338,848.79 193,181.00 02 1390 SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION 69,797.52 41,452.17 35,996.00 35,961.07 52,932.00 02 1510 BASIC SK.ILLS 4,362.79 2,353.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1520 DROPOUT PREVENTION 14,738.08 14,565.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1522 VJT AL LINKS PROGRAM 10,328.44 1,279.18 14,065.00 6,606.10 14,441.00 01 1525 ALTERNATIVE ED PROGRAMS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1525 ALTERNATIVE ED PROGRAMS 229,784.31 325,845.46 35,475.00 35,310.25 0.00 02 1550 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUC 120,760.93 111,647.56 62,031.00 62,030.17 57,941.00 02 1555 HIPPY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 1560 READING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21,287.00 02 1560 READING 79,685.61 75,709.52 72,779.00 72,777.59 8,275.00 01 1590 OTHER COMP ED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,325.00 02 1590 OTHER COMP ED 167,730.99 150,500.16 174,932.00 168,772.41 273,170.00 02 1591 COMP ED PARENT/HOMEWORK C 109,134.13 75,868.38 83.438.00 83,435.24 0.00 02 1592 COMP ED ELE EXTEND DAY 499.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 1593 COMP ED TURNING POINT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1593 COMP ED TURNING POINT 42,771.43 33,646.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1594 COMP ED PALS LAB 10,966.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 390,136.80 378,380.58 415,735.00 415,733.34 429,419.00 02 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 49,117.85 54,017.06 63,137.19 63,135.34 101,279.00 01 1911 arr PROJECT PROMISE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1911 arr PROJECT PROMISE 7,624.89 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 02 1912 arr SUl'vIMER QUEST 16,200.52 22,932.72 44,605.00 22,016.83 22,388.00 Page: 10 North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function Funds: Salary (01)\nOperating (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fund Fnct Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 01 1913 Gff MATHEMATICS 0.00 0.00 14,700.00 14,700.00 14,700.00 02 1913 Gff MATHEMATICS 19,818.44 18,027.89 3,065.38 3,003.22 5,265.00 02 1914 arr SCIENCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 1950 ALTERNATIVE LEARN ENV 0.00 0.00 207,353.00 195,997.80 252,948.00 02 1950 ALTERNATIVE LEARN ENV 0.00 0.00 373,062.03 280,366.80 237,384.00 02 1990 OTHER INSTRUCTIONAL SER V 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1992 OTHER INSTRUCTIONAL - IC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2110 ATTEND \u0026amp; SOCIAL WRK SEV 69,798.26 50,304.30 50,429.00 46.021.52 22,233.00 01 2120 GUIDANCE/COUNSELING SERV 905,111.89 919,726.65 955,727.00 955,726.71 1,064,014.00 02 2120 GUIDANCE/COUNSELING SERV 177,093.39 189,001.54 267,791.00 240,087.03 391,107.00 02 2123 APPRAISAL SERVICES 12,833.53 15,519.97 I2,282.00 11,612.04 36,700.00 02 2130 HEAL TH SER VICES 92,450.67 104,196.23 107,357.00 106,830.16 132,053.00 02 2131 JOHNSON \u0026amp; JOHNSON GRANT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 2140 PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES 174,376.81 I 52,138.13 194,230.00 194,229.33 172,371.00 02 2140 PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES 78,503.21 74,304.74 15,661.00 15,660.46 41,229.00 01 2150 SPEECH PATH/AUDIOLOGY SER 389,677.14 359,791.83 356.641.00 350.445.27 425,934.00 02 2150 SPEECH PATH/AUDIOLOGY SER 169,571.20 205,918.58 214,375.00 207,847.72 266,084.00 01 2160 PHYS \u0026amp; OCC THERAPY 61,774.94 71,362.96 74,344.00 7d.:\nJ~.88 30...196.00 02 2160 PHYS \u0026amp; ace THERAPY 23,806.74 50,278.40 88,612.00 86,582.94 107,692.00 01 2190 OTHER PUPIL SUPPORT SERV 0.00 51,327.62 60,627.00 60,626.40 61,887.00 02 2190 OTHER PUPIL SUPPORT SERV 4,230.33 49,058.36 122,547.00 121,159.02 142,478.00 02 2191 ROCKEFELLER ED RENEWAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2193 NA TL SCIENCE FOUND GRANT 7,514.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2194 AASA ADVISE GRANT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2195 STUDENT ASSIGNMENT CLASS 0.00 30,625.29 221,675.00 220,777.16 0.00 01 2210 INSTRUCTION/SUPERVISION 555,826.07 I 638,940.43 700,740.00 700,738.82 759,728.00 02 2210 INSTRUCTION/SUPERVISION 432,415.69 467,951.61 542,638.00 420,289.24 567,632.00 02 2211 INSTRUCTION COE/NCA 4,788.47 1,558.73 9,264.00 5,828.73 7,500.00 02 2212 ELEMENTARY INSERVICE 0.00 0.00 2,065.00 2,063.40 0.00 01 2215 CH I ADM/INSTRUCTION 29,875.38 15,417.75 15,847.00 15,846.24 16,476.00 02 2215 CH I ADM/INSTRUCTION 7,934.50 14,164.43 14,622.00 14,621.80 7,680.00 02 2216 INSER VICE-ADE CURR-C 585.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2217 INSERVICE-ADE CURR-B 1,058.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2218 INSERVICE-ADE CURRICULUM 37,371.68 22,969.44 52,000.00 18,440.24 33,560.00 02 2219 INSERVICE-ADE READING 1,024.26 2,882.83 13,277.00 6,182.87 32,094.00 01 2220 EDUCATION MEDIA SERVICES 583,299.87 572,554.59 589,929.00 589,928.27 685,081.00 Page: 11 - -- North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function Funds: Salary (OJ)\nOpera/in,! (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 FWld Fnct Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 2220 EDUCATION MEDIA SERVICES 393,832.93 409,280.82 400,041.00 391,385.88 561,026.00 02 2225 INSTRUCTIONAL COMPUTER 31,540.40 17,326.04 34,768.00 24,139.35 32,500.00 02 2295  0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2310 BOARD OF EDUCATION SER VIC 232,666.92 259,918.27 250,160.00 205,353.38 255,845.00 01 2320 SUPERINTENDENTS OFFICE 90,110.93 94,041.52 102,735.00 101,163.60 99,914.00 02 2320 SUPERINTENDENTS OFFICE 71,545.48 61,625.21 46,989.00 44,623.63 83,174.00 01 2321 ASST SUPT INSTRUCTION 61,420.65 65,456.68 68,731.00 68,730.78 0.00 02 2321 ASST SUPT INSTRUCTION 31,254.60 32,766.13 36,221.00 34,246.25 540.00 01 2322 ASST SUPT BUSINESS SERVIC 60,260.25 61,528.15 63,348.00 63,347.64 64,608.00 02 2322 ASST SUPT BUSINESS SERVIC 32,146.80 33,486.67 34,718.00 34,272.70 47,625.00 01 2323 ASST SUPT PUPIL SER VICES 60,260.38 9,871.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2323 ASST SUPT PUPIL SERVICES 32,046.62 5,081.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 2324 ASST SUPT DESEGREGATION 56,351.85 56,272.34 63,348.00 i 63,347.64 64,608.00 02 2324 ASST SUPT DESEGREGATION I 45,566.17 43,701.22 49,174.00 41,185.28 89,923.00 01 2400 PRINCIPAL'S OFFICE I 1,092.383.33 1,089,182.79 1.106,956.00 I, I 06,955.42 1,020,564.00 02 i 2400 PRINCIPAL'S OFFICE 664,246.46 703,381.72 739,917.00 726,805.80 942,598.00 01 I 2401 ASST. PRINCIPALS 0.00 629,884.45 675,247.00 675,246.37 538,906.00 02 2401 ASST. PRINCIPALS 0.00 52,685.60 54,783.00 54,542.04 113,754.00 01 2410 ASST PRINCIPAL'S OFFICE 592,413.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2410 ASST PRINCIPAL'S OFFICE 44,953.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2510 BUSINESS SUPPORT SERVICES 113,937.05 119,373.14 123,890.00 120,773.21 145,537.00 02 2511 BUSINESS SERV-FINANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2515 BUSINESS-FINANCE/ AUDITING 0.00 0.00 71,347.00 71,196.98 98,413.00 02 2530 F AC ACQUIS/CONST SER VICES 0.00 0.00 128,493.00 14,000.00 0.00 01 2540 M \u0026amp; 0 OF PLANT SERVICES 60,298.41 61,565.76 63,386.00 63,385.20 64,645.00 02 2540 M \u0026amp; 0 OF PLANT SERVICES 1,488,145.08 1,610,805.83 1,418,867.00 1,403,672.94 66 I ,461.00 02 2541 M \u0026amp; O-CUSTODIAL SERVICES 1,241,626.19 1,324,593.18 1,333,902.00 1,333,900.00 1,539,052.00 02 2549 M \u0026amp; 0 UTILITIES \u0026amp; INSUR 1,428,033.30 I, 160,628.52 1,287,823.00 1,267,012.85 1,278,019.00 02 2550 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION SER 1,050,789.35 1,033,987.82 338,628.00 295,024.15 590,289.00 02 2551 MECHANICS 0.00 236,077.16 221,370.00 221,369.21 219,432.00 02 2552 BUS DRIVERS 0.00 0.00 784,627.00 731,990.72 834,009.00 02 2553 BUS AIDES 0.00 0.00 121,680.00 115,017.01 150.275.00 02 2555 MAGNET/M-TO-M TRANSP. 31,619.12 32,757.14 24,897.00 38,925.61 187,171.00 02 2560 FOOD SERVICES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,600.00 OJ 2570 INTERNAL SERVICES 60,298.53 65,555.10 67,964.00 67,963.54 64,645.00 02 2570 INTERNAL SERVICES 91,199.29 81,583.01 153,303.00 54,687.93 367,332.00 Page: 12 North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function Funds: Salary (01)\nOperatinf! (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fund Fnct Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 2600 SUPPORT SERVICES-CENTRAL 0.00 0.00 26,914.00 26,913.85 0.00 02 2630 INFORMATION SERVICES 35,-i94.94 37,460.01 48,110.00 47,463.80 80,600.00 01 2640 PERSONNEL SERVICES 60,298.4 I 61,565.76 63,386.00 63,385.30 64,645.00 02 2640 PERSONNEL SERVICES 36,929.52 64,468.88 53,802.00 54,081.72 52,005.00 101 2660 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 48,590.49 49,590.96 50,208.00 50,208.00 53,939.00 02 2660 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 140,061.19 158,442.38 160,882.00 147,513.55 174,497.00 02 2900 OTHER SUPPORTING SERVICES 2,718.67 890.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2901 CROSSING GUARDS 56,271.57 63,877.05 76.202.36 63,481.96 70,871.00 '02 2902 BREAKFAST/LUNCH AIDES 187,129.87 199,195.63 238,484.00 188,950.67 269,346.00 02 2905 VLPS 4,478.28 188.00 3,046.00 2,911.84 3,000.00 02 3900 OTHER COMMUNITY SERVICES 3,108.00 3,589.50 2,898.00 2,898.00 1,500.00 01 4100 PAYMENTS TO OTHERS 1,116,219.65 1,104,025.15 1,188,791.00 1,109,503.33 1,305,000.00 02 4900 PAYMENT TO STATE 12,253.92 8,002.46 26,051.00 19.399.39 20,000.00 02 5100 BONDED INDE9:!::!::\u0026gt;NESS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 193,610.00 04 5100 BONDED INDEBTEDNESS 1,130,326.40 1,048,392.25 1,250,394.00 1,216,517.23 1,161,063.00 04 5101 BONDED INDEBTEDNESS-PCSSD 23,351.50 18,769.85 18,578.00 18.577.76 18,650.00 04 5102 BONDED INDEBTEDNESS-LR 35,092.04 35,416.64 35,436.00 35,435.90 35,600.00 Grand Tot:ii~\n...,, :-..,,iJ5 1,2,\u0026amp; 4 36,224,356.65 37,339,951.78 39,915,889.65 38,397,216.03 43,886,463.00 Page: 13 North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 E.x:penditures by Object Funds: Salary (OJ)\nOperatinf! (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fund Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 01 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 18,069,269.74 18,369,424.17 18,711,826.30 18,619,753.97 19,744,330.00 02 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 606,633.28 680,513.42 870,655.95 684,183.85 564,373.00 01 00115 CERTIFIED ADMIN 2, 790,319.05 2,851,452.52 2,997,526.88 2,995,952.82 2,705,863.00 02 00115 CERTIFIED ADMIN 31,900.82 63,990.96 48,614.78 41,604.78 55,897.00 01 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 4,797,606.80 5,234,121.81 5,908,887.72 5,757,009.39 5,352,916.00 02 00125 NON-CERTIFIED ADMIN 224,202.98 188,483.34 251,125.77 251,125.77 255,947.00 01 00130 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS 306,194.40 269,446.00 252,949.38 252,948.00 255,000.00 02 00130 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS 260.00 437.80 8,773.12 2,205.20 12,140.00 01 00131 ASSIGNED SUBSTITUTES 71,807.90 83,661.00 80,860.23 80,859.20 84,000.00 02 00131 ASSIGNED SUBSTITUTES 0.00 2,074.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 00140 SUBSTITUTES, NON-CERT. 24,835.20 34,267.80 39,620.92 34,188.40 35,420.00 02 00150 STIPENDS-WORKSHOPS 28,220.59 30,666.25 43,381.54 20.984.50 48,680.00 02 00151 STIPENDS NON-CERTIFIED 0.00 560.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 00155 STIPENDS-OTHER 1,300.95. 8,482.04 8,436.89 7,551.00 5,000.00 02 00156 STIPENDS-OTHER NON-CERT 0.00 170.00 1,990.50 1,650.00 330.00 01 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o:::: /)/)~!/) SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 1.627.892.40 1.670,082.91 1.714.723.53 1,684.443 .54 1,809,366.00 --- - -- - - 02 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 3 7:,, 122.62 \u0026lt;+0b,633.11 .+6.3,oo2.87 452,.395.00 02 00212 SS TAX, STIPENDS 2,189.28 2,345.74 3,900.26 1,731.26 4,257.00 02 00213 SS TAX STIPENDS NON CERT 0.00 42.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 00214 SS TAX STIPENDS-OTHER 99.52 648.87 1,788.68 577.67 351.00 02 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 22,677.00 0.00 2,812,236.00 02 00221 TEACH RETIRE, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 2,998.00 0.00 639,127.00 02 00231 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET SYST 61,803.78 60,971.50 63,875.57 61,835.56 67,294.00 01 00240 INSURANCE 528,287.71 538,040.63 533,565.06 527,784.14 1,231,009.00 02 00240 INSURANCE 8,777.82 12,035.30 10,560.38 10,559.54 25,036.00 02 00241 INSURANCE, NON-CERT 167,475.73 175,531.80 197,805.11 191,886.32 502,913.00 01 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 33,729.21 33,552.77 12,118.42 11,680.25 23,749.00 02 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 7,332.51 8,142.93 3,489.79 3,276.45 6,098.00 02 00252 UNEMPLOYMENT COMP,STIPEND 0.00 0.00 108.50 0.46 200.00 01 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 00260 WORKERS COMP 23,104.34 191,829.96 170,533.94 167,489.02 166,189.00 02 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 5,310.35 150,546.12 118,332.16 113,891.92 84,167.00 02 00262 WORKER'S COMP, STIPENDS 0.00 0.00 176.00 4.86 517.00 Page: 14 Nortlt Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Object Funds: Salary (01)\nOperatinf( (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fund Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 00270 ANNUITY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,200.00 01 00290 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 9,637.00 8,309.50 13,892.00 13,892.00 16,300.00 02 00290 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 0.00 0.00 279.00 279.00 0.00 02 00300 PURCHASED SER VICES 0.00 (52,305.88 0.00 (161,003.06 (10,000.00 02 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 236,917.38 304,098.30 314,912.15 280,465.39 217,042.00 02 00311 CONSOLIDATION LA WSUlT SER 85,080.99 78,995.70 98,365.44 98,365.44 85,000.00 02 00312 LEGAL SERVICES 32,551.77 19,091.24 21,980.37 21,980.37 35,000.00 02 00313 ELECTION SER VICES 8,636.03 11,640.24 12,098.03 12,098.03 12,100.00 02 00314 DESEGREGATION MONITOR 50,322.00 62,253.00 55,510.00 55,510.00 67,500.00 02 00315 AUDIT SERVICES 15,950.00 16,100.00 8,308.00 8,308.00 16,500.00 02 00316 SECURITY SERVICES 46,942.81 43,742.25 48,732.46 43,016.82 51,450.00 02 00317 MAGNET REVIEW COMMITTEE 25,000.00 25,000.00 21,475.17 25,000.00 25,000.00 02 00318 RENTAL OF EQUIP \u0026amp; VEHICLE 12,403.12 24,230.84 4,077.33 4,033.18 600.00 02 00319 RENTAL OF LAND \u0026amp; BUILDfNG 3,756.04 4,805.69 4,578.90 3,238.90 5,315.00 02 00320 RENT AL/LEASE OF COPIERS 18,147.81 25,799.90 15,854.88 20,832.57 18,626.00 02 00321 UTITLITY SERVICES-GAS 218,463.09 159,194.84 213,823.94 206,807.22 205,817.00 02 00322 UTILITY SERVICES-ELECT 799,413.36 689,241.78 717,802.00 709,373.65 722,215.00 02 00323 UTlL TITY SERVICES-WATER 67,832.82 60,777.89 59,881.36 59,875.31 61,817.00 02 00324 CLEANING SERVICES 477.58 43.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 00325 REPAIRSIMAlNT-BLD/GRNDS 48,636.18 71,399.13 28,062.80 28,172.27 5,000.00 02 00326 REPAIRS/MAlNT-EQUIP 84,652.77 96,586.50 78,277.86 77,687.25 85,889.28 02 00327 REPAIRS/MAfNT-BUSNEHICLE 25,190.82 17,764.41 12,269.99 8,832.56 12,880.96 02 00328 REPAIRS/MAfNT-SEC SYSTEM 2,342.10 0.00 2,612.48 2,612.48 100.00 02 00329 WASTE DISPOSAL 51,843.37 53,038.07 51,897.10 49,341.07 49,880.00 02 00330 TRANSPORTATION/CONFERENCE 0.00 0.00 9.05 0.00 0.00 02 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 177,064.18 185,342.66 194,872.98 164,267.27 78,791.00 02 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 33,884.59 24,890.85 72,426.95 35,325.29 35,099.00 02 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 27,067.40 29,379.67 28,162.65 20,288.00 23,689.10 02 00334 CAR ALLOWANCE-MONTHLY 24,451.06 24,713.10 24,086.51 24,454.01 19,695.00 01 00335 INDISTRICT TRAVEL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 00335 INDISTRICT TRAVEL 12,858.10 9,119.38 9,874.22 8,111.39 6,090.00 02 00337 ADMISSION FEES 0.00 0.00 664.00 283.25 500.00 02 00338 ENTRANCE FEES 0.00 0.00 810.00 810.00 810.00 02 00341 TELEPHONE 171,947.59 116,510.03 101,822.03 91,032.48 80,091.00 02 00342 POSTAGE 42,491.81 53,211.74 35,264.75 45,079.73 28,664.90 02 00350 ADVERTISfNG 2,347.52 1,125.27 1,513.67 1,275.47 1,700.00 Page: 15 North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Object Funds: Salary (OJ)\nOperating (02)\nDebt Service (04) Fund lobject 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 00355 WRECKER SER VICE 2,490.00 2,150.00 2,085.00 1,365.00 3,000.00 02 00360 PRINTING AND BrNDING 17,286.91 20,699.00 29,908.75 21,920.23 29,816.00 02 100361 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 01 '00370 TUITION 84,173.89 159,368.95 157,521.50 157,520.89 180,000.00 02 100370 TUITION 50,177.88 35,060.21 48,535.00 58,826.77 35,000.00 01 00371 TUTION - PCSSD 110,453.11 130,181.69 115,087.18 115,087.18 155,000.00 01 00372 TUITION - MAGNET 984,594.54 949,354.46 1,049,999.32 970,711.65 1,120,000.00 02 00380 FOOD SERVICES 5,421.86 13,076.27 23,137.38 16,441.71 14,430.00 02 00383 FIRE SAFETY SERVICE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 ,00385 M\u0026amp;O/CUSTODIAL SERVICES 0.00 6,574.00 19,815.00 8,019.00 11,796.00 02 100390 OTHER PURCHASED SER VICES 61,293.77 84,282.29 87,741.31 75,849.16 39,685.00 02 00391 PHOTOGRAPHY 367.28 623.22 295.10 295.10 700.00 02 00392 TRASH/WASTE SERVICES 0.00 0.00 475.60 552.30 0.00 02 00394 SECURITY OFFICER SERVICES 3,725.00 3,685.50 6,060.00 5,347.50 5,750.00 02 00395 ARCH/ENG SERVICES 0.00 0.00 800.00 0.00 0.00 02 00398 STAFF DEVELOPMENT 2,872.50 10,066.23 21.886.61 9,623.48 21,940.00 02 00400 SUPPLIES \u0026amp; MA TER1ALS 0.00 (281,409.07 (75,000.00 (228,270.83) (75,000.00 02 00401 SUPPLIES, TOOLS \u0026amp; SM EQUI 3,086.20 3,289.24 3,353.50 3.353.50 0.00 02 00405 SALES AND USE TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 lb0.00 02 00410 SUPPLIES AND MA TER1ALS 615,622.06 695,746.85 731,309.14 654,348.71 605,171.47 02 0041 l SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 59,798.76 98,139.53 0.00 0.00 200.00 02 00412 SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL 42,562.86 60,289.12 34,056.00 23,424.09 250.00 02 100413 SUPPLIES PLUMBING 25,882.25 33,780.19 23,318.00 23,394.35 0.00 02 100414 SUPPLIES FLOORING 1,407.96 752.21 1,382.84 1,382.84 0.00 02 00415 SUPPLIES ROOFING 9,564.81 7,670.59 907.61 4,976.98 0.00 02 00416 SUPPLIES HARDWARE 36,903.71 35,319.07 23,071.00 23,070.38 0.00 02 00417 SUPPLIES PAINTING 35,532.54 29,692.68 22,132.00 22,131.33 0.00 02 00418 SUPPLIES PUTTY/GLASS 8,196.71 8,819.15 7,366.12 7,366.12 250.00 02 00419 SUPPLIES-HY AC 0.00 0.00 33,589.47 3,561.62 0.00 02 00420 TEXTBOOKS 79,976.98 71,324.28 486,022.40 401,878.76 369,444.00 02 00422 STATE TEXTBOOKS 0.00 0.00 19,082.47 19,081.89 0.00 02 00430 LIBRARY BOOKS 58,215.40 58,849.06 54,885.24 53,266.43 56,983.00 02 00440 PERIODICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS 15,654.82 20,620.20 22,728.77 21,075.52 19,008.00 02 00450 AUDIOVISUAL MA TER1ALS 24,909.82 26,101.78 21,052.21 19,733.56 18,034.00 102 00451 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 184.44 0.00 56,008.49 52,699.45 28,450.25 02 00464 GASOLINE AND DIESEL 117,158.36 133,546.35 98,815.29 97,886.52 91,219.04 Page: 16 North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Object Funds: Salarv (01)\nOperating (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fund Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 00490 OTHER SUPPLIES/MA TERlALS 350.06 370.47 935.27 366.85 2,830.00 02 00492 BUILDING MATERIALS 61,645.60 56,091.01 32,740.25 35,894.54 250.00 02 00495 FOOD 0.00 0.00 8,192.67 5,447.45 36,214.00 02 00496 PARTS/SUPPL, VEHICLE BUS 124,773.81 113,289.87 109,519.19 101,770.78 95,000.00 02 00497 PARTS/SUPPL, EQUIP REPAIR 52,624.86 37,836.32 34,408.06 31,510.70 30,000.00 02 00499 AWARDS 5,537.78 4,856.91 5,855.46 4,780.98 6,420.00 02 00520 BUILDINGS 0.00 0.00 26,000.00 14,000.00 36,123.00 02 00521 CARPET 954.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 00525 BLINDS 0.00 3,829.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 00533 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT 8,927.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 00540 EQUIPMENT 130,133.86 126,213.91 84,536.28 71,603.93 118,662.00 02 00541 FURNITURE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 00549 BAND INSTRUMENTS 553.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 00550 VEHICLES I 24,264.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 00551 BUSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80,250.00 02 00570 IMPROVEMENTS 0.00 0.00 102,493.00 0.00 0.00 02 00610 REDEMPTION OF PRINCIPAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 193,610.00 04 00610 REDEMPTION OF PRINCIPAL 474,843.71 460,534.18 602,008.25 602,008.22 472,180.00 04 00620 INTEREST 709,800.03 638,210.06 698,670.31 667,439.43 737,933.00 02 00630 DUES AND FEES 15,782.50 15,885.25 23,582.14 19,017.09 17,574.00 04 00630 DUES AND FEES 4,126.20 3,834.50 3,729.44 1,083.24 5,200.00 02 00641 PROPERTY INSURANCE 132,949.00 I 10,301.80 124,354.45 123,543.10 126,105.00 02 00642 LIABILITY INSURANCE 5,465.20 5,515.20 5,515.20 5,515.20 5,515.00 02 00644 VEHICLE INSURANCE 102,843.00 54,079.00 62,237.00 62,051.00 58,030.00 02 00645 ACCIDENT INS-STUDENTS 15,196.00 17,714.20 21,128.00 21,128.00 19,235.00 02 00646 ACCIDENT AL DEA TH INS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 00650 LEGAL AGREE/JUDGEMENTS 69.30 37,002.26 25,317.03 42,817.03 500.00 02 00660 PROPERTY TAXES 0.00 0.00 5,030.35 5,030.35 0.00 02 00670 INDIRECT COSTS 0.00 3,779.92 8,045.68 0.00 4,283.00 02 00690 OTHER EXPENSES 9,875.56 700.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 00699 EXPENDITURE REFUNDS (243,860.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 00840 UNEXPECTED CONTINGENCIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200,000.00 Grand Totals Fund I, 2, 4 36,224,356.65 37,339,951.78 39,915,889.65 38,397,216.03 43,886,463.00 Page: 17 North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function/Object Fu11ds: Salary (OJ)\nOperating (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 01 1000 00240 INSURANCE 0.00 11,857.62 15,000.00 10,924.33 15,000.00 02 1000 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 0.00 8,451.00 7,620.22 0.00 02 1104 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 0.00 78,975.00 0.00 79,275.00 02 1104 00115 CERTIFIED ADMIN 0.00 0.00 1,350.00 0.00 1,350.00 02 1104 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0.00 0.00 2,700.00 0.00 2,700.00 02 I 104 00150 STIPENDS-WORKSHOPS 0.00 0.00 2,300.00 0.00 2,000.00 02 1104 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 0.00 6,120.00 0.00 6,168.00 02 1104 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 0.00 0.00 210.00 0.00 207.00 02 1104 00212 SS TAX, STIPENDS 0.00 0.00 180.00 0.00 176.00 02 1104 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 9,650.00 0.00 9,640.00 02 1104 00221 TEACH RETIRE, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 350.00 0.00 324.00 02 1104 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.00 85.00 0.00 85.00 02 1104 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 3.00 02 1104 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 0.00 575.00 0.00 575.00 02 I 104 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 19.00 02 1104 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 0.00 6,825.00 0.00 6,825.00 02 1104 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 44.00 02 1104 00342 POSTAGE 0.00 0.00 200.00 140.80 152.00 02 1104 00360 PRINTING AND BINDING 0.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 500.00 02 1104 00380 FOOD SERVICES 0.00 0.00 3,700.00 0.00 3,700.00 02 1104 00385 . M\u0026amp;O/CUSTODIAL SERVICES 0.00 0.00 4,500.00 0.00 4,500.00 02 1104 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 16,504.00 8,018.09 4,952.00 02 1104 00420 TEXTBOOKS 0.00 0.00 77,993.00 0.00 0.00 02 1104 00495 FOOD 0.00 0.00 200.00 42.48 0.00 02 1105 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 3,240.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1105 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 96,968.11 90,562.18 89,408.17 89,407.60 96,715.00 02 1105 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 247.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1105 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 7,373.65 6,825.57 6,752.47 6,752.47 7,398.00 02 1105 00221 TEACH RETIRE, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,606.00 02 1105 00241 INSURANCE, NON-CERT 6,789.28 6,410.84 6,169.09 6,169.09 15,572.00 02 1105 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 136.29 135.39 44.42 44.42 97.00 02 l 105 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 93.48 784.99 625.93 625.93 677.00 02 1105 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 100.00 123.50 1,950.00 1,950.00 900.00 02 1105 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 38,346.83 8,011.24 42,310.92 0.00 7,500.00 02 1105 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 0.00 3,650.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 02 1105 00341 TELEPHONE 990.59 990.00 991.61 991.61 2,100.00 Page: 18 NortJ, Little Rock Public Scl,ools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function/Object Funds: Salary (OJ)\nOperating (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 1105 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 3,831.24 4,498.70 1,124.39 1,124.39 1,500.00 02 1105 00495 FOOD 0.00 0.00 78.00 78.00 150.00 02 1105 00521 CARPET 373.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1105 00533 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT 8,927.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1105 00540 EQUIPMENT 3,400.07 200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 1110 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 1,054,269.70 1,124,931.79 I, 172,314.00 I, 172,313.43 1,239,596.00 02 1110 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 2,820.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1110 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 79,610.54 85,505.37 88,314.00 88,313.62 96,845.00 02 1110 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 215.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1110 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 151,916.00 01 1110 00240 INSURANCE 30,571.78 32,741.14 32,333.00 32,332.61 70,009.00 02 1110 00241 INSURANCE, NON-CERT 214.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1110 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 1,693.37 1,681.94 587.00 586.35 1,267.00 02 1110 00251 UN EMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 6.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1110 00260 WORKERS COMP 1,140.92 9,612.39 8,207.00 8,206.32 8,862.00 02 1110 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 798.87 97.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1110 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 11,073.83 10,523.46 10,019.00 7,900.62 9,396.00 02 1110 00540 EQUIPMENT 968.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 1120 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 4,982,083.12 4,895,868.77 5,047,075.00 5,025,609.69 5,I86,984.00 02 1120 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 11,414.86 27,651.75 23,757.00 23,756.40 59,370.00 01 1120 00130 . SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS 18I,388.50 126,504.30 118,345.30 118,344.40 I 16,000.00 01 1120 00131 ASSIGNED SUBSTITUTES 37,801.90 50,046.30 45,960.70 45,960.70 48,000.00 02 1120 00140 SUBSTITUTES, NON-CERT. 13,551.90 27,840.10 14,208.00 11,382.80 14,270.00 02 1120 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 387,737.93 379,590.82 394,938.00 386,068.94 404,032.00 02 I 120 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 1,876.86 4,211.34 2,793.00 2,606.91 5,633.00 02 1120 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 617,101.00 02 1120 00221 TEACH RETIRE, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,125.00 01 1120 00240 INSURANCE 145,348.39 140,502.48 134,980.70 134,980.70 308,451.00 02 1120 00241 INSURANCE, NON-CERT 856.66 2,022.13 1,689.00 1,688.28 4,208.00 02 1120 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 8,088.27 7,622.94 2,627.00 2,596.01 5,263.00 02 1120 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 39.74 83.50 19.00 18.63 70.00 02 1120 00260 WORKERS COMP 5,685.59 43,963.55 36,882.00 36,338.70 36,973.00 02 1120 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 25.31 447.42 263.00 245.00 517.00 01 1120 00290 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 6,242.50 3,887.50 6,563.00 6,563.00 9,000.00 02 1120 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 2,245.50 1,398.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1120 00320 RENTAL/LEASE OF COPIERS 342.78 3,170.62 0.40 1,581.39 900.00 Page: 19 North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function/Object Funds: Salary (01)\nOperating (02), Debt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 1120 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 0.00 269.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1120 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 6,658.43 6,681.30 6,348.56 5,405.10 8,200.00 02 1120 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 643.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1120 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 0.00 55.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1120 00335 INDISTRICT TRAVEL 0.00 30.63 50.00 30.63 25.00 02 1120 00360 PRINTING AND BINDING 168.00 0.00 I 17.60 0.00 145.00 02 I 120 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 62,845.58 67,378.38 70,890.98 67,449.04 87,698.00 02 1120 00420 TEXTBOOKS 55,860.33 50,815.48 175,859.82 175,850.74 160,647.00 02 1120 00422 ST A TE TEXTBOOKS 0.00 0.00 2,812.03 2,811.45 0.00 02 1120 00430 LIBRARY BOOKS 0.00 0.00 444.38 444.36 0.00 02 I 120 00499 AWARDS 0.00 0.00 33.23 33.23 0.00 02 I 120 00540 EQUIPMENT 1,740.15 825.85 583.00 90.95 1,000.00 02 I 120 00630 DUES AND FEES 38.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 I 121 00335 INDISTRICT TRAVEL 994.66 1,177.29 1,679.00 1,315.87 800.00 02 1121 00342 POSTAGE 9.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 I 121 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 3,281.75 796.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1121 00420 TEXTBOOKS 0.00 0.00 6,291.00 821.51 0.00 02 1123 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 0.00 14,625.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1126 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 2,281.52 2,145.34 16,000.00 02 1126 00430 LIBRARY BOOKS 0.00 0.00 544.48 544.48 0.00 01 1130 00110 . REGULAR CERTIFICATED 2,203,650.99 2,181,811.05 1,990,297.00 1,990,296.68 2, I 05,692.00 02 1130 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 60,520.08 65,545.66 98,117.00 95,680.06 101,060.00 01 1130 00130 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS 66,864.00 68,973.40 56,715.48 56,715.00 59,000.00 01 1130 00131 ASSIGNED SUBSTITUTES 24,185.00 22,019.50 7,899.50 7,899.50 8,000.00 02 1130 00140 SUBSTITUTES, NON-CERT. 8,338.10 4,059.60 8,597.00 5,989.90 8,850.00 02 I 130 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 172,254.29 170,879.60 154,555.00 153,244.37 163,926.00 02 1130 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 5,016.92 5,103.10 7,931.00 7,549.53 8,409.00 02 1130 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 252,685.00 02 1130 00221 TEACH RETIRE, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,127.00 01 1130 00240 INSURANCE 59,280.84 59,181.86 49,700.17 49,700.17 106,171.00 02 1130 00241 INSURANCE, NON-CERT 4,283.65 4,220.64 6,051.00 5,908.87 16,131.00 02 1130 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 3,561.83 3,409.24 1,033.00 1,026.03 2,147.00 02 1130 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 110.09 103.40 54.00 50.90 110.00 02 1130 00260 WORKERS COMP 2,482.76 19,542.19 14,422.00 14,385.07 15,001.00 02 1130 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 75.31 590.82 747.00 711.55 770.00 01 1130 00290 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 552.00 405.00 1,581.00 1,581.00 1,500.00 Page: 20 North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function/Object Funds: Salary (01)\nOperating (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 1130 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 0.00 525.65 850.00 492.65 850.00 02 1130 00316 SECURITY SERVICES 0.00 0.00 160.00 100.00 0.00 02 1130 00318 RENT AL OF EQUIP \u0026amp; VEHICLE 0.00 0.00 270.00 0.00 0.00 02 1130 00320 RENTAL/LEASE OF COPIERS 88.30 313.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1130 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 230.17 35.40 131.50 106.50 300.00 02 1130 00330 TRANSPORTATION/CONFERENCE 0.00 0.00 9.05 0.00 0.00 02 1130 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 1,375.43 1,631.40 3,478.60 1,360.90 2,800.00 02 1130 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 270.95 194.00 300.00 10.50 270.00 02 1130 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 475.00 0.00 830.00 335.00 3,250.00 02 I 130 00335 INDISTRICT TRAVEL 1,001.37 1,384.84 820.00 677.48 1,000.00 02 1130 00342 POSTAGE 2,131.46 1,574.75 3,111.79 2,254.47 2,310.00 02 1130 00360 PRINTING AND BINDING 106.80 300.28 949.43 198.43 400.00 02 1130 00390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES 0.00 0.00 3,091.00 2,956.01 1,000.00 02 1130 00394 SECURITY OFFICER SERVICES 0.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 150.00 02 1130 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 21,880.95 28,660.01 20,866.28 19,876.45 18,736.00 02 1130 00420 TEXTBOOKS 6,206.96 141.05 95,353.00 95,353.04 82,176.00 02 1130 00440 PERIODICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 0.00 471.25 371.25 300.00 02 1130 00450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 50.00 10.65 0.00 02 1130 00495 FOOD 0.00 0.00 500.00 100.00 400.00 02 1130 00521 CARPET 366.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1130 00540 . EQUIPMENT 5,709.99 2,895.02 4,745.20 2,520.94 1,458.00 02 1130 00630 DUES AND FEES 0.00 312.25 465.90 288.00 928.00 02 1131 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 02 1131 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 1,295.52 1,298.48 450.00 0.00 100.00 02 I 131 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 1,575.75 2,618.50 409.58 334.20 250.00 02 1131 00334 CAR ALLOWANCE-MONTHLY 0.00 180.60 10.00 0.00 0.00 02 1131 00335 INDISTRICT TRAVEL 168.00 84.00 290.00 236.88 265.00 02 1131 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 3,332.47 2,944.42 598.42 377.42 950.00 02 1131 00420 TEXTBOOKS 0.00 2,290.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1131 00499 AWARDS 249.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1131 00540 EQUIPMENT 1,714.51 1,679.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1131 00630 DUES AND FEES 470.00 355.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 02 1132 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 1,139.79 934.85 1,649.22 1,585.34 1,335.00 02 1132 00450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 117.78 119.47 0.00 02 1133 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 6,548.26 1,914.59 1,891.00 1,487.69 1,245.00 02 1134 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 2,303.78 2,638.19 1,726.00 1,724.54 1,395.00 Page: 21 - North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function/Object Funds: Salary (OJ)\nOperating (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 1134 00440 PERIODICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 255.00 02 I 135 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 0.00 114.00 114.00 0.00 02 1135 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 0.00 871.38 704.00 653.62 849.00 02 I 135 00450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 156.00 154.41 221.00 02 1135 00540 EQUIPMENT 1,056.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1137 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 1,483.84 1,660.01 3,148.00 3,135.63 2,200.00 02 I 137 00540 EQUIPMENT 0.00 1,988.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1139 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 02 1139 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 387.13 824.90 1,661.00 1,649.23 925.00 01 1140 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 3,522,525.32 3,616,804.71 3,659,695.00 3,659,694.30 3,957,018.00 02 1140 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 32,518.80 34,871.04 36,685.44 36,685.44 38,520.00 02 I 140 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 11,788.56 41,150.72 45,271.76 45,270.34 48,185.00 01 1140 00130 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS 57,941.90 73,968.30 77,888.60 77,888.60 80,000.00 01 1140 00131 ASSIGNED SUBSTITUTES 9,821.00 11,595.20 27,000.03 26,999.00 28,000.00 02 1140 00140 SUBSTITUTES, NON-CERT. 2,945.20 2,368.10 13,253.62 13,253.40 12,300.00 02 1140 00150 STIPENDS-WORKSHOPS 4,373.50 6,656.25 3,609.50 3,609.50 7,210.00 02 1140 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 268,275.86 278,046.78 281,873.53 281,873.31 307,153.00 02 1140 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 1,127.35 3,310.70 4,453.00 4,452.54 5,206.00 02 1140 00212 SS TAX, STIPENDS 334.57 509.22 276.12 276.12 552.00 02 1140 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 479,465.00 02 1140 00221 . TEACH RETIRE, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,691.00 01 I 140 00240 INSURANCE 87,071.50 86,666.94 83,294.37 83,294.37 203,584.00 02 1140 00240 INSURANCE 785.38 844.20 844.31 844.31 2,104.00 02 1140 00241 INSURANCE, NON-CERT 856.54 2,461.54 2,462.00 2,461.65 6,805.00 02 1140 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 5,617.56 5,616.90 1,904.25 1,903.63 4,126.00 02 1140 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 22.25 65.08 30.00 29.30 76.00 02 1140 00252 UNEMPLOYMENT COMP,STIPEND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.00 02 1140 00260 WORKERS COMP 3,943.90 32,096.88 26,636.79 26,636.06 28,895.00 02 1140 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 7.99 358.95 410.00 409.97 527.00 02 1140 00262 WORKER'S COMP, STIPENDS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 01 1140 00290 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 2,566.50 4,017.00 5,748.00 5,748.00 5,800.00 02 1140 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 450.00 363.98 350.00 95.00 0.00 02 1140 00316 SECURITY SERVICES 0.00 0.00 100.00 100.00 0.00 02 1140 00318 RENTAL OF EQUIP \u0026amp; VEHICLE 874.31 2,708.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1140 00319 RENTAL OF LAND \u0026amp; BUILDING 3,706.04 3,665.69 2,418.90 2,418.90 3,665.00 02 1140 00320 RENT AL/LEASE OF COPIERS 1,898.80 2,794.74 3,396.01 3,024.64 3,500.00 Page: 22 North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function/Object Funds: Salary (OJ)\nOperating (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 1140 00326 REPAIRS/MAlNT-EQUIP 1,232.72 2,847.52 1,300.00 898.34 1,600.00 02 I 140 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 5,551.98 4,202.10 4,417.80 4,250.90 8,000.00 02 1140 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 02 1140 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 02 I 140 00335 IND I STRICT TRAVEL 1,489.54 1,130.39 1,200.00 1,047.59 1,200.00 02 I 140 00342 POSTAGE 9,176.11 9,057.16 12,493.29 12,087.38 8,000.00 02 I 140 00360 PRINTING AND BINDING 196.61 0.00 5,000.00 4,927.29 2,300.00 02 I 140 00380 FOOD SERVICES 0.00 0.00 1,500.00 778.13 1,500.00 02 1140 00390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES 0.00 0.00 25.56 25.43 0.00 02 1140 00394 SECURITY OFFICER SERVICES 3,725.00 3,685.50 4,100.00 4,020.00 4,000.00 02 1140 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 34,366.06 33,635.09 48,731.00 44,307.59 41,943.75 02 1140 00420 TEXTBOOKS 8,431.05 17,128.28 120,715.00 122,088.24 126,621.00 02 1140 00422 ST A TE TEXTBOOKS 0.00 0.00 16,270.44 16,270.44 0.00 02 1140 00440 PERIODICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 0.00 3,907.00 3,907.02 190.00 02 1140 00451 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,589.25 02 1140 00495 FOOD 0.00 0.00 200.00 169.40 750.00 02 1140 00499 AWARDS 0.00 0.00 280.96 280.96 750.00 02 1140 00540 EQUIPMENT 5,062.35 14,779.04 7,154.04 2,934.93 4,350.00 02 I 140 00630 DUES AND FEES 1,314.00 916.00 1,750.00 1,295.00 50.00 02 1140 00670 INDIRECT COSTS 0.00 0.00 901.68 0.00 980.00 02 1141 00318  RENTAL OF EQUIP \u0026amp; VEHICLE 274.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1141 00324 CLEANING SERVICES 459.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1141 00326 REPAIRS/MA INT-EQUIP 2,024.27 2,864.55 1,757.00 1,752.56 1,250.00 02 1141 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 3,916.74 4,719.95 338.00 337.20 500.00 02 1141 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 665.62 937.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1141 00342 POSTAGE 232.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1141 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 8,240.30 6,875.88 0.00 0.00 400.00 02 1141 00451 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 02 1141 00499 AWARDS 198.08 81.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1141 00540 EQUIPMENT 2,091.31 779.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1141 00549 BAND INSTRUMENTS 553.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 I 141 00630 DUES AND FEES 580.00 450.00 60.00 60.00 0.00 02 I 142 00410 SUPPLIES AND MA TERI A LS 1,036.71 1,644.67 1,950.00 1,925.79 850.00 02 1142 00430 LIBRARY BOOKS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 900.00 02 I 143 00155 STIPENDS-OTHER 0.00 360.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1143 00214 SS TAX STIPENDS-OTHER 0.00 27.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 Page: 23 North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function/Object Funds: Salary (OJ)\nOperating (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 1143 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1143 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 2.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1143 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 863.68 1,339.86 1,325.00 1,200.90 3,600.00 02 1143 00451 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 02 1144 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 3,045.56 6,077.17 7,565.00 5,443.02 6,300.00 02 1144 00540 EQUIPMENT 0.00 1,450.53 25.00 0.00 200.00 02 1145 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 1,387.56 1,515.80 1,745.00 1,713.57 1,263.00 02 1145 00440 PERIODICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 187.00 02 1146 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 88.10 62.00 0.00 0.00 02 1146 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 238.00 237.23 250.00 02 1147 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 2,687.48 647.38 2,070.00 1,767.62 1,800.00 02 1149 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 416.10 487.69 272.00 271.13 200.00 02 1149 00540 EQUIPMENT 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 200.00 02 I 150 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 0.00 1,235.04 1,235.04 1,300.00 02 1150 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 99.00 02 1150 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 0.00 0.00 94.46 94.46 0.00 02 1150 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 156.00 02 1150 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 02 I 150 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 2.09 1.38 0.00 02 1150 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.00 02 1150 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 0.00 0.00 9.41 9.41 0.00 02 1150 00319 RENTAL OF LAND \u0026amp; BUILDING 0.00 840.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1150 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 21,993.61 1,986.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1150 00630 DUES AND FEES 0.00 2,750.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1151 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 7,325.23 8, IO 1.53 8,290.00 6,343.38 9,500.00 02 1151 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 11,548.97 12,821.56 17,331.00 14,572.50 15,000.00 02 1151 00410 SUPPLIES AND MA TERI A LS 25,512.16 26,817.59 31,200.00 30,417.65 30,500.00 02 1151 00499 AWARDS 2,175.37 1,931.49 2,158.00 1,499.40 2,300.00 02 1151 00540 EQUIPMENT 1,866.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,500.00 02 1152 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 02 1152 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 5,797.36 8,065.06 9,349.48 8,477.80 9,900.00 02 1152 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 7,992.29 9,990.05 12,682.34 12,022.41 13,000.00 02 1152 00499 AWARDS 742.86 1,302.13 1,200.00 944.78 1,100.00 02 1152 00540 EQUIPMENT 0.00 445.56 390.18 390.18 1,000.00 02 1153 00316 SECURITY SERVICES 0.00 0.00 20.00 20.00 100.00 02 1153 00319 RENTAL OF LAND \u0026amp; BUILDING 0.00 0.00 960.00 720.00 1,200.00 Page: 24 North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Fu11ction/Object Funds: Salary (01)\nOperating (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 1153 00320 RENTAL/LEASE OF COPIERS 58.86 106.14 104.26 100.06 120.00 02 1153 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 02 1153 00334 CAR ALLOWANCE-MONTHLY 540.00 540.00 540.00 540.00 540.00 02 1153 00341 TELEPHONE 206.25 205.47 421.68 234.22 435.00 02 1153 00342 POSTAGE 110.30 180.89 115.42 115.42 150.00 02 1153 00410 SUPPLIES AND MA TERJALS 193.10 68.74 989.48 650.89 500.00 02 1153 00540 EQUIPMENT 0.00 0.00 1,657.00 1,469.68 0.00 02 1153 00630 DUES AND FEES 0.00 0.00 39.16 20.00 20.00 02 1153 00645 ACCIDENT INS-STUDENTS 15,196.00 17,714.20 21,128.00 21,128.00 19,235.00 02 1160 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 7,051.09 889.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1160 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 0.00 0.00 825.00 60.00 0.00 02 1160 00410 SUPPLIES AND MA TERJALS 0.00 0.00 6,235.00 4,102.46 0.00 02 1160 00630 DUES AND FEES 0.00 0.00 2,750.00 2,750.00 2,750.00 02 1161 00150 STIPENDS-WORKSHOPS 820.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1161 00212 SS TAX, STIPENDS 62.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1161 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 0.00 140.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1161 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 70.37 316.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1161 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 0.00 180.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1161 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 130.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1161 00410 SUPPLIES AND MA TERJALS 10,703.25 5,589.09 565.00 563.37 4,000.00 02 1162 00410 . SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 0.00 6,803.99 0.00 0.00 2,200.00 02 1165 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 800.00 02 1165 00316 SECURJTY SERVICES 0.00 0.00 20.00 20.00 0.00 02 1165 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 0.00 0.00 3,017.00 3,016.92 4,650.40 02 I 165 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 0.00 3,109.00 3,108.95 3,526.00 02 1165 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 490.78 490.78 554.00 02 1165 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 02 1165 00338 ENTRANCE FEES 0.00 0.00 500.00 500.00 500.00 02 1165 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERJALS 0.00 0.00 6,680.00 6,387.17 6,484.60 02 1165 00451 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 311.00 02 1165 00540 EQUIPMENT 0.00 0.00 6,865.00 6,864.45 3,392.00 02 1165 00630 DUES AND FEES 0.00 0.00 285.00 285.00 285.00 02 1166 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 0.00 0.00 100.00 100.00 250.00 02 1166 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 151.20 722.00 737.60 685.00 02 1166 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 179.01 179.01 202.00 02 1166 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 0.00 0.00 100.00 100.00 500.00 Page: 25 North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function/Object Funds: Salary (01)\nOperating (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 1166 00338 ENTRANCE FEES 0.00 0.00 310.00 310.00 310.00 02 1166 00410 SUPPLIES AND MA TERI A LS 0.00 182.56 1,984.00 2,007.79 2,614.00 02 1166 00451 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 0.00 0.00 172.28 172.28 194.00 02 1166 00499 AWARDS 0.00 0.00 484.00 483.74 550.00 02 1166 00630 DUES AND FEES 0.00 260.00 180.00 180.00 225.00 02 1191 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 50,520.00 154,892.50 204,240.00 162,140.00 42,100.00 02 I 191 00115 CERTIFIED ADMIN 11,745.50 15,249.00 21,692.50 17,692.50 4,000.00 02 1191 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 4,566.00 12,090.00 16,100.85 12,805.00 3,351.00 02 1191 00150 STIPENDS-WORKSHOPS 620.00 0.00 705.00 60.00 180.00 02 1191 00156 STIPENDS-OTHER NON-CERT 0.00 0.00 I,380.50 1,380.00 0.00 02 1191 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 4,763.04 13,015.79 16,977.95 13,756.95 3,527.00 02 1191 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 349.28 924.97 1,251.60 979.60 272.00 02 1191 00212 SS TAX, STIPENDS 47.43 0.00 160.72 110.16 14.00 02 1191 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 5,532.00 0.00 5,532.00 02 1191 00221 TEACH RETIRE, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 426.00 0.00 426.00 02 I 191 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 1.50 255.22 291.49 249.27 42.00 02 1191 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 0.00 18.14 23.43 17.82 4.00 02 1191 00252 UNEMPLOYMENT COMP,STIPEND 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 2.00 02 1191 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 1,361.13 1,716.82 1,418.44 295.00 02 1191 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 0.00 96.72 136.05 109.96 25.00 02 1191 00262  WORKER'S COMP, STIPENDS 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 02 1191 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 0.00 0.00 80.00 79.13 0.00 02 1191 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 0.00 5,658.00 5,658.00 0.00 02 1191 00335 INDISTRICT TRAVEL 0.00 82.09 77.00 76.68 0.00 02 1191 00342 POSTAGE 47.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1191 00370 TUITION 8,820.00 0.00 l I,535.00 26,530.00 0.00 02 1191 00380 FOOD SERVICES 0.00 7,636.45 2,261.00 2,260.90 0.00 02 1191 00385 M\u0026amp;O/CUSTODIAL SERVICES 0.00 4,789.00 9,317.00 5,317.00 4,000.00 02 1191 00390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES 0.00 34,636.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1191 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 11,552.62 7,382.12 17,914.84 17,285.19 742.00 02 1191 00430 LIBRARY BOOKS 360.07 0.00 763.25 763.25 0.00 02 1191 00495 FOOD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 02 1191 00670 INDIRECT COSTS 0.00 2,658.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1192 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 15,841.00 18,294.00 33,055.60 17,809.50 15,246.00 02 1192 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 1,211.84 1,399.54 2,528.47 1,362.47 1,180.00 02 1192 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 1,830.00 0.00 1,830.00 Page: 26 North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function/Object Funds: Salary (01)\nOperatinf! (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 1192 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 27.44 41.70 26.70 15.00 02 1192 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 146.35 249.50 142.50 107.00 02 1192 00318 RENT AL OF EQUIP \u0026amp; VEHICLE 1,550.00 420.00 420.00 420.00 0.00 02 1192 00327 REPAIRS/MAINT-BUS/VEHICLE 32.95 66.00 494.73 292.03 80.96 02 1192 00342 POSTAGE I 7.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 I 192 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 0.00 14.28 1,000.00 444.53 555.00 02 1192 00464 GASOLINE AND DIESEL 662.67 900.00 900.00 591.61 419.04 02 1192 00644 VEHICLE INSURANCE 0.00 344.00 344.00 161.00 180.00 02 1193 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 325.00 50.00 121.93 121.93 0.00 02 1193 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 160.20 165.00 165.00 0.00 02 1193 00337 ADMISSION FEES 0.00 0.00 164.00 164.00 0.00 02 1193 00342 POSTAGE 0.00 0.00 61.25 61.25 0.00 02 1193 00350 ADVERTISING 0.00 0.00 323.80 323.80 0.00 02 1193 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 3,596.80 4,182.63 816.00 815.60 5,000.00 02 1193 00430 LIBRARY BOOKS 0.00 0.00 2,189.00 2,188.33 0.00 02 1193 00450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 13.55 13.55 0.00 02 1193 00540 EQUIPMENT 572.23 192.23 1,476.54 827.84 0.00 02 1194 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 19,860.00 24,875.22 51,965.46 26,625.00 25,340.00 02 1194 00115 CERTIFIED ADMIN 2,300.00 2,342.88 1,660.00 0.00 1,660.00 02 1194 00150 STIPENDS-WORKSHOPS 290.00 200.00 300.00 300.00 0.00 02 1194 00155 STIPENDS-OTHER 0.00 183.00 227.89 196.00 160.00 02 1194 00156 STIPENDS-OTHER NON-CERT 0.00 170.00 610.00 270.00 330.00 02 1194 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 1,695.20 2,082.34 4,102.82 2,036.82 2,066.00 02 1194 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 0.00 13.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1194 00212 SS TAX, STIPENDS 22.18 15.28 55.57 43.57 26.00 02 1194 00214 SST AX STIPENDS-OTHER 0.00 13.98 40.99 14.99 26.00 02 1194 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 3,263.00 0.00 3,240.00 02 1194 00221 TEACH RETIRE, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 41.00 0.00 41.00 02 1194 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 41.42 55.12 27.12 27.00 02 1194 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 0.00 0.26 1.14 0.14 1.00 02 1194 00252 UNEMPLOYMENT COMP,STIPEND 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 02 1194 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 220.80 392.39 203.39 190.00 02 1194 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 0.00 1.36 4.89 1.89 2.00 02 1194 00262 WORKER'S COMP, STIPENDS 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 02 1194 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 35.07 15.24 39.94 39.94 0.00 02 1194 00342 POSTAGE 199.04 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 Page: 27 North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function/Object Funds: Salary (OJ)\nOperatinl! (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 1194 00385 M\u0026amp;O/CUSTODIAL SERVICES 0.00 1,785.00 5,998.00 2,702.00 3,296.00 02 1194 00410 SUPPLIES AND MA TERI A LS 3,503.78 3,946.99 3,250.79 2,449.94 1,062.00 02 1194 00670 INDIRECT COSTS 0.00 0.00 1,803.00 0.00 1,803.00 02 1195 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 3,442.50 3,105.00 4,860.00 3,105.00 4,160.00 02 1195 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 607.50 1,147.50 1,620.00 1,012.50 0.00 02 1195 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 263.16 237.38 372.00 237.41 318.00 02 I 195 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 46.44 87.72 124.00 77.40 0.00 02 I 195 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 499.00 02 I 195 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 4.18 4.60 2.00 1.43 4.00 02 1195 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 0.00 1.70 1.00 0.45 0.00 02 1195 00260 WORKERS COMP 4.77 26.72 34.00 21.67 29.00 02 1195 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 0.21 9.58 11.00 7.05 0.00 02 1195 00316 SECURITY SERVICES 0.00 0.00 20.00 20.00 0.00 02 I 195 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 742.20 0.00 1,055.00 0.00 100.00 01 1199 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 73,227.83 74,374.32 74,374.32 78,090.00 02 I 199 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0.00 26,761.72 27,095.00 27,094.80 27,910.00 02 1199 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 5,559.87 5,689.77 5,676.71 5,974.00 02 1199 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 0.00 2,047.30 2,055.88 2,055.88 2,135.00 02 1199 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,371.00 02 1199 00221 TEACH RETIRE, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,349.00 01 1199 00240 . INSURANCE 0.00 1,617.59 1,688.68 1,688.14 4,208.00 02 1199 00241 INSURANCE, NON-CERT 0.00 432.74 472.08 472.08 490.00 02 I 199 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 109.85 40.91 40.91 78.00 02 I 199 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 0.00 40.13 13.46 13.46 28.00 02 1199 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 585.78 524.29 524.29 547.00 02 1199 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 0.00 214.10 189.61 189.61 195.00 02 1199 00334 CAR ALLOWANCE-MONTHLY 0.00 540.00 540.00 540.00 540.00 01 1210 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 77,212.26 91,795.20 129,118.60 129,118.20 131,080.00 02 1210 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 270.00 02 1210 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0.00 0.00 270.00 0.00 0.00 02 1210 00155 STIPENDS-OTHER 0.00 330.00 2,740.00 2,740.00 2,740.00 02 1210 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 5,617.82 6,737.87 9,503.64 9,542.46 10,049.00 02 1210 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 0.00 0.00 21.00 0.00 0.00 02 1210 00214 SS TAX STIPENDS-OTHER 0.00 25.24 210.00 209.61 210.00 02 1210 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,763.00 02 1210 00221 TEACH RETIRE, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 33.00 0.00 0.00 Page: 28 North Little Rock Public Sc/tools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function/Object Funds: Salary (01)\nOperatinK (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 01 1210 00240 INSURANCE 1,713.07 1,687.92 1,969.40 1,969.36 5,052.00 02 1210 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 138.00 138.34 67.52 66.25 134.00 02 1210 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 02 1210 00260 WORKERS COMP 83.55 787.21 921.84 920.12 938.00 02 1210 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 02 1210 00335 INDISTRICT TRAVEL 2,156.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 1212 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33,493.00 02 1212 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,563.00 02 1212 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,020.00 01 1212 00240 INSURANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,104.00 02 1212 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34.00 02 1212 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 235.00 01 1215 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 25,200.00 27,818.00 27,817.92 29,209.00 02 1215 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 1,924.47 2,125.36 2,125.20 2,234.00 02 1215 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,505.00 01 1215 00240 INSURANCE 0.00 843.96 844.00 843.96 2,104.00 02 1215 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 37.87 14.00 13.92 29.00 02 1215 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 201.60 194.64 194.64 204.00 01 1220 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 1,494,469.24 1,859,615.51 1,918,625.00 1,898,358.30 2,041,139.00 02 1220 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 0.00 4,200.00 0.00 0.00 02 1220 00120 . REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0.00 0.00 26,084.00 22,183.79 24,749.00 02 1220 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 110,603.71 138,787.71 141,008.00 140,685.01 158,288.00 02 1220 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 0.00 0.00 1,997.00 1,697.19 1,894.00 02 1220 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 220.00 0.00 248,974.00 02 1220 00221 TEACH RETIRE, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 468.00 0.00 2,970.00 01 1220 00240 INSURANCE 40,680.51 48,640.49 49,846.00 49,065.79 126,467.00 02 1220 00241 INSURANCE, NON-CERT 0.00 0.00 1,617.70 1,617.70 4,208.00 02 1220 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 2,346.19 2,782.83 955.00 949.63 2,082.00 02 1220 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 15.00 10.96 25.00 02 1220 00260 WORKERS COMP 1,572.40 15,765.63 13,319.00 13,288.48 14,527.00 02 1220 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 0.00 0.00 184.00 155.31 173.00 02 1220 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 100.00 02 1220 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 2,440.09 2,098.69 2,347.65 1,391.00 2,386.00 02 1220 00420 TEXTBOOKS 0.00 0.00 63.35 63.35 0.00 02 1220 00440 PERIODICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 185.00 02 1220 00540 EQUIPMENT 0.00 178.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 Page: 29 North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function/Object Funds: Salary (OJ)\nOperatinf.! (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 1220 00630 DUES AND FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 01 1240 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 514,275.65 364,852.61 462,654.00 462,103.16 695,101.00 02 1240 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,600.00 02 1240 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 14,772.92 41,120.97 49,272.00 44,271.59 130,744.00 02 1240 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 38,071.86 27,258.17 34,191.00 34,190.09 58,129.00 02 1240 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 1,130.50 3,137.27 5,265.00 3,356.84 5,755.00 02 1240 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 91,178.00 02 1240 00221 TEACH RETIRE, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,025.00 01 1240 00240 INSURANCE 15,230.99 10,901.78 14,149.00 14,148.21 50,316.00 02 1240 00241 INSURANCE, NON-CERT 1,284.81 3,049.24 2,609.00 2,451.34 2,104.00 02 1240 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 800.16 547.41 231.00 230.29 761.00 02 1240 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 25.72 61.62 34.00 21.96 76.00 02 1240 00260 WORKERS COMP 505.35 3,232.99 3,235.00 3,234.62 5,322.00 02 1240 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 3.90 335.02 482.00 309.79 527.00 02 1240 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 107.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 02 1240 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250.00 02 1240 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250.00 02 1240 00380 FOOD SERVICES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,200.00 02 1240 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 1,006.01 297.40 1,336.00 1,011.06 3,899.00 02 1240 00451 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 02 1240 00490 . OTHER SUPPLIES/MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,830.00 02 1240 00495 FOOD 0.00 0.00 571.00 570.84 1,330.00 02 1240 00540 EQUIPMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,620.00 02 1240 00630 DUES AND FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 02 1240 00670 INDIRECT COSTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,500.00 02 1241 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 250.00 01 1250 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 175,532.62 88,281.73 I 17,747.00 90,889.56 0.00 02 1250 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 14,081.25 14,580.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1250 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 13,252.92 6,721.73 6,906.00 6,905.33 0.00 02 1250 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 1,077.20 1,115.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 1250 00240 INSURANCE 4,444.15 1,850.12 2,632.00 1,928.78 0.00 02 1250 00241 INSURANCE, NON-CERT 463.04 456.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1250 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 273.47 132.44 46.00 45.31 0.00 02 1250 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 21.92 21.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1250 00260 WORKERS COMP 178.11 812.31 637.00 636.11 0.00 02 1250 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 14.77 124.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 Page: 30 North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function/Object Funds: Salary (01)\nOperatinf! (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 01 1260 00370 TUITION 63,001.89 134,879.95 133,817.00 133,816.39 150,000.00 02 1271 00370 TUITION 11,066.61 12,051.54 15,315.00 13,298.67 10,765.00 02 1272 00370 TUITION 30,291.27 23,008.67 19,685.00 18,998.10 24,235.00 01 1280 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 132,263.27 149,368.75 90,904.80 90,904.80 0.00 02 1280 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 9,608.89 10,925.06 6,611.80 6,611.80 0.00 01 1280 00240 INSURANCE 4,140.01 4,712.29 2,532.20 2,531.52 0.00 02 1280 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 203.87 224.12 45.96 45.36 0.00 02 1280 00260 WORKERS COMP 142.50 1,276.01 636.24 636.24 0.00 02 1280 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 190.08 149.19 212.16 212.16 0.00 02 1280 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 185.00 205.00 180.00 180.00 0.00 02 1280 00380 FOOD SERVICES 694.71 810.00 1,535.86 1,535.86 0.00 02 1280 00390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES 0.00 0.00 240.00 240.00 0.00 02 1280 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 1,434.78 1,756.11 3,157.64 3,096.87 0.00 02 1280 00451 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 0.00 0.00 919.52 600.66 0.00 02 1280 00490 OTHER SUPPLIES/MATERIALS 350.06 370.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1280 00540 EQUIPMENT 270.62 2,253.64 3,017.82 2,704.04 0.00 02 1280 00670 INDIRECT COSTS 0.00 0.00 1,500.00 0.00 0.00 02 1285 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 11,575.63 12,838.83 10,755.87 10,755.87 14,850.00 02 1285 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 886.16 983.35 823.89 823.89 1,136.00 02 1285 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 16.23 19.43 6.26 6.08 15.00 02 1285 00261 . WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT I 1.10 552.00 314.98 314.98 104.00 02 1290 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 147,864.92 137,448.11 174,902.59 183,386.98 177,407.00 02 1290 00131 ASSIGNED SUBSTITUTES 0.00 2,074.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1290 00210 SOCIAL SECURJTY TAX 11,098.93 10,000.69 13,785.48 13,785.48 13,572.00 02 1290 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21,289.00 02 1290 00240 INSURANCE 2,597.63 3,123.52 4,360.48 4,360.48 12,412.00 02 1290 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 190.80 211.79 91.79 91.79 177.00 02 1290 00260 WORKERS COMP 114.43 1,226.30 1,283.66 1,283.66 1,242.00 02 1290 00410 SUPPLIES AND MA TERI A LS 0.00 3,783.57 2,955.00 0.00 0.00 01 1320 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 84,414.58 43,920.00 44,530.62 44,487.72 46,760.00 02 1320 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 6,252.90 3,322.57 3,360.54 3,360.54 3,577.00 02 1320 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,611.00 01 1320 00240 INSURANCE 1,713.31 844.32 844.38 844.38 2,104.00 02 1320 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION I 31.25 65.84 23.00 22.30 47.00 02 1320 00260 WORKERS COMP 89.50 396.71 311.46 311.46 327.00 02 1320 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 Page: 31 North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function/Object Funds: Salary (OJ)\nOperating (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 1320 00334 CAR ALLOWANCE-MONTHLY 990.00 495.00 495.00 495.00 0.00 02 1320 00341 TELEPHONE 438.72 438.72 439.31 438.72 0.00 02 1320 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 425.75 697.88 1,049.69 1,049.69 350.00 02 1320 00440 PERIODICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 0.00 150.00 150.00 0.00 02 1320 00540 EQUIPMENT 2,405.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 1330 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 382,226.08 400,234.20 345,360.00 345,207.16 386,688.00 02 1330 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 28,437.99 30,142.04 25,883.00 25,882.08 30,348.00 02 1330 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 47,603.00 01 1330 00240 INSURANCE 9,421.89 9,283.56 7,596.00 7,595.41 21,040.00 02 1330 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 593.90 600.36 174.00 173.08 399.00 02 1330 00260 WORKERS COMP 403.13 3,407.70 2,417.00 2,416.33 2,779.00 02 1330 00320 RENTAL/LEASE OF COPIERS 0.00 441.85 700.00 564.69 0.00 02 1330 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 2,237.66 666.21 633.00 633.00 1,400.00 02 1330 00334 CAR ALLOWANCE-MONTHLY 495.00 495.00 495.00 495.00 0.00 02 1330 00335 INDISTRICT TRAVEL 450.45 483.22 500.00 0.00 100.00 02 1330 00341 TELEPHONE 408.96 408.96 733.08 408.96 0.00 02 1330 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 17,456.10 32,694.12 41,554.66 41,074.61 19,800.00 02 1330 00420 TEXTBOOKS 0.00 0.00 654.20 653.82 0.00 02 1330 00450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 52.70 0.00 531.26 531.26 0.00 02 1330 00451 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 0.00 0.00 458.80 458.79 0.00 02 1330 00540 . EQUIPMENT 15,548.51 26,617.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 1350 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 271,659.88 232,888.18 168,421.00 168,377.64 176,850.00 02 1350 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 10,449.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1350 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 21,090.94 17,585.87 12,557.00 12,556.90 13,529.00 02 1350 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21,222.00 01 1350 00240 INSURANCE 6,867.58 5,535.60 3,848.00 3,847.91 8,888.00 02 1350 00240 INSURANCE 214.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1350 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 438.48 349.34 85.00 84.22 177.00 02 1350 00260 WORKERS COMP 292.98 2,011.77 1,179.00 1,178.38 1,238.00 02 1350 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 1,344.88 131.58 0.00 0.00 450.00 02 1350 00341 TELEPHONE 1,626.24 1,221.12 1,544.99 1,221.12 0.00 02 1350 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 15,910.55 9,634.37 6,952.01 6,881.44 2,100.00 02 1350 00450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0.00 90.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1350 00540 EQUIPMENT 16,582.28 9,163.02 0.00 0.00 22,770.00 01 1352 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 66,213.84 68,534.64 74,934.00 73,550.16 77,235.00 02 1352 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 4,905.98 5,110.06 5,552.00 5,466.48 6,354.00 Page: 32 -- North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function/Object Funds: Salary (OJ)\nOperating (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 1352 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,966.00 01 1352 00240 INSURANCE 1,285.70 1,266.84 1,297.00 1,296.28 4,208.00 02 1352 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 102.90 102.83 37.00 36.92 85.00 02 1352 00260 WORKERS COMP 70.19 583.80 515.00 514.81 597.00 02 1352 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 0.00 0.00 260.31 259.61 200.00 02 1352 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 947.46 314.76 842.84 842.84 575.00 02 1352 00540 EQUIPMENT 0.00 450.80 427.85 427.85 0.00 02 1355 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 0.00 912.52 110.00 0.00 100.00 02 1355 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERJALS 0.00 1,533.63 2,116.49 2,047.04 250.00 02 1355 00540 EQUIPMENT 0.00 10,426.81 22,773.51 21,875.56 0.00 01 1360 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 275,260.60 288,481.09 169,181.00 168,421.07 201,674.00 02 1360 00210 SOCIAL SECURJTY TAX 20,130.08 21,489.18 12,154.00 12,153.78 15,428.00 02 1360 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,201.00 01 1360 00240 INSURANCE 6,831.21 6,865.05 4,291.00 4,290.11 10,520.00 02 1360 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 427.92 432.83 85.00 84.06 202.00 02 1360 00260 WORKERS COMP 304.76 2,458.75 l, 179.00 1,178.81 l,4I2.00 02 1360 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 1,523.34 1,602.69 963.20 962.74 850.00 02 1360 00334 CAR ALLOWANCE-MONTHLY 425.00 450.00 450.00 450.00 0.00 02 1360 00341 TELEPHONE 0.00 0.00 324.00 0.00 0.00 02 1360 00410 SUPPLIES AND MA TERJALS 8,720.97 7,864.96 4,915.81 4,866.31 2,550.00 02 1360 00440 PERIODICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS 56.00 111.75 225.00 225.00 0.00 02 1360 00450 AUDIOVISUAL MA TERJALS 769.05 1,036.29 133.47 133.47 0.00 02 1360 00495 FOOD 0.00 0.00 87.17 86.69 0.00 02 1360 00540 EQUIPMENT 7,425.68 2,593.42 1,359.35 1,339.35 0.00 01 1370 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 52,689.00 77,064.82 91,280.00 88,259.62 117,142.00 02 1370 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 3,822.38 5,661.40 6,709.00 6,708.54 8,962.00 02 1370 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,057.00 01 1370 00240 INSURANCE 1,224.34 1,574.65 1,598.00 1,527.83 2,904.00 02 1370 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSA TJON 82.45 115.56 45.00 44.70 117.00 02 1370 00260 WORKERS COMP 57.91 645.01 627.00 626.19 821.00 02 1370 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 0.00 0.00 129.23 129.23 200.00 02 1370 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 1,653.77 1,643.05 1,240.24 1,053.89 700.00 02 1370 00430 LIBRARY BOOKS 0.00 0.00 90.27 90.27 0.00 02 1370 00440 PERIODICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS 251.62 217.59 340.26 340.00 0.00 02 1370 00450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0.00 37.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1370 00540 EQUIPMENT 396.68 4,538.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 Page: 33 -- North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function/Object Funds: Salary (OJ)\nOperating (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 1380 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 02 1380 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 896.52 0.00 253.00 252.31 150.00 02 1380 00540 EQUIPMENT 3,650.25 316.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 1390 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 343,484.33 338,505.60 332,513.00 332,469.24 186,765.00 02 1390 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 5,573.73 643.52 644.92 644.10 675.00 02 1390 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 22,633.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1390 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 26,265.29 25,791.70 25,187.26 25,186.60 19,099.00 02 1390 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 1,731.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1390 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29,958.00 01 1390 00240 INSURANCE 7,331.03 6,801.36 6,450.00 6,379.55 6,416.00 02 1390 00241 INSURANCE, NON-CERT 856.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1390 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 540.59 508.77 167.32 166.39 252.00 02 1390 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 37.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1390 00260 WORKERS COMP 387.53 2,897.33 2,332.50 2,331.93 1,748.00 02 1390 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 19.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1390 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 115.00 201.22 0.00 0.00 200.00 02 1390 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 191.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1390 00334 CAR ALLOWANCE-MONTHLY 1,485.00 1,485.00 1,485.00 1,485.00 0.00 02 1390 00335 INDISTRICT TRAVEL 596.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1390 00341 TELEPHONE 424.80 424.80 424.81 424.80 0.00 02 1390 00360 . PRINTING AND BINDING 234.53 0.00 225.00 221.53 0.00 02 1390 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 3,606.56 8,733.76 5,085.93 5,057.47 1,000.00 02 1390 00430 LIBRARY BOOKS 244.57 283.89 443.26 443.25 0.00 02 1390 00450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0.00 37.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1390 00540 EQUIPMENT 4,853.74 445.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1510 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 1,677.43 13.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1510 00320 RENT AL/LEASE OF COPIERS 397.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1510 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 62.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1510 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 485.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1510 00380 FOOD SERVICES 35.69 84.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1510 00390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES 37.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1510 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 1,298.93 781.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1510 00540 EQUIPMENT 0.00 711.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1510 00690 OTHER EXPENSES 430.00 700.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1520 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 12,769.70 12,689.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1520 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 976.65 970.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 Page: 34 - North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function/Object Funds: Salary (OJ)\nOperati11g (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 1520 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 19.77 18.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1520 00260 WORKERS COMP 13.44 109.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1520 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 54.15 52.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1520 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERJALS 904.37 723.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1522 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 7,710.00 0.00 8,000.00 3,840.00 9,000.00 02 1522 00210 SOCIAL SECURJTY TAX 589.81 0.00 610.00 293.76 689.00 02 1522 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,080.00 02 1522 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.00 5.00 1.99 9.00 02 1522 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 0.00 60.00 25.41 63.00 02 1522 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 0.00 2,040.00 2,040.00 2,100.00 02 1522 00341 TELEPHONE 0.00 0.00 1,065.00 0.00 0.00 02 1522 00342 POSTAGE 87.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1522 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 1,940.73 1,279.18 1,885.00 273.12 1,000.00 02 1522 00495 FOOD 0.00 0.00 400.00 131.82 500.00 02 1525 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 26,647.79 19,860.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1525 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 101,786.28 90,834.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1525 00150 STIPENDS-WORKSHOPS 0.00 500.00 2,680.00 2,680.00 0.00 02 1525 00155 STIPENDS-OTHER 150.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1525 00210 SOCIAL SECURJTY TAX 1,935.75 1,519.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1525 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 7,633.89 6,778.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1525 00212 SS TAX, STIPENDS 0.00 38.20 206.00 205.02 0.00 02 1525 00214 SS TAX STIPENDS-OTHER 11.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1525 00231 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET SYST 78.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1525 00240 INSURANCE 999.29 843.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1525 00241 INSURANCE, NON-CERT 7,379.73 5,869.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1525 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 37.02 30.49 2.21 1.34 0.00 02 1525 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 160.22 136.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1525 00260 WORKERS COMP 23.91 173.63 19.00 18.76 0.00 02 1525 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 113.60 778.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1525 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 51,854.46 93,673.45 25.00 25.00 0.00 02 1525 00320 RENTAL/LEASE OF COPIERS 1,892.4 I 2,573.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1525 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 295.82 266.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1525 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 495.48 72,646.80 220.40 220.40 0.00 02 1525 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 591.77 108.43 1,208.11 1,208.11 0.00 02 1525 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 1,650.00 750.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1525 00334 CAR ALLOWANCE-MONTHLY 180.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Page: 35 North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function/Object Funds: Salary (01)\nOveratin2 (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 1525 00335 INDISTRICT TRAVEL 151.20 33.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1525 00342 POSTAGE 29.00 96.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1525 00380 FOOD SERVICES 0.00 22.57 I 15.00 115.00 0.00 02 1525 00390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES 0.00 0.00 718.00 718.00 0.00 02 1525 00398 STAFF DEVELOPMENT 0.00 5,600.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 0.00 02 1525 00410 SUPPLIES AND MA TERJALS 6,936.22 10,771.92 6,680.11 6,517.45 0.00 02 1525 00420 TEXTBOOKS 8,914.19 775.95 2,269.17 2,269.17 0.00 02 1525 00430 LIBRARY BOOKS 2,957.54 3,448.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1525 00440 PERJODICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS 339.00 664.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1525 00450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0.00 784.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1525 00495 FOOD 0.00 0.00 132.00 132.00 0.00 02 1525 00540 EQUIPMENT 6,540.09 5,093.52 20,000.00 20,000.00 0.00 02 1525 00630 DUES AND FEES 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1525 00670 INDIRECT COSTS 0.00 1,121.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1550 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 300.00 450.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1550 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 73,570.46 73,907.58 37,237.44 37,237.44 36,221.00 02 1550 00140 SUBSTITUTES, NON-CERT. 0.00 0.00 3,562.30 3,562.30 0.00 02 1550 00150 STIPENDS-WORKSHOPS 60.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1550 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 22.95 34.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1550 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 5,252.79 5,368.94 3,121.25 3,121.25 3,199.00 02 1550 00212 SS TAX, STIPENDS 4.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1550 00221 TEACH RETIRE, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,018.00 02 1550 00241 INSURANCE, NON-CERT 5,329.86 1,119.22 84.85 84.85 282.00 02 1550 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1550 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 98.31 I 10.42 20.61 20.61 41.00 02 1550 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 3.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1550 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 73.96 629.12 285.34 285.34 292.00 02 1550 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 4,086.40 7,875.45 500.00 500.00 500.00 02 1550 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 270.39 93.77 114.60 I 14.60 100.00 02 1550 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 1,078.01 701.98 797.98 797.15 1,000.00 02 1550 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 170.50 300.00 360.00 360.00 500.00 02 1550 00334 CAR ALLOWANCE-MONTHLY 2,801.06 2,365.00 1,321.51 1,321.51 1,500.00 02 1550 00335 INDISTRJCT TRAVEL 385.00 380.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1550 00341 TELEPHONE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 150.00 02 1550 00342 POSTAGE 31.50 77.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1550 00380 FOOD SERVICES 191.68 0.00 474.78 474.78 50.00 Page: 36 - North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function/Object Funds: Salary (01)\nOperating (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 1550 00390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.00 02 1550 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 15,753.63 16,990.14 14,026.27 14,026.27 8,848.00 02 1550 00411 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 1,834.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1550 00464 GASOLINE AND DIESEL 0.00 529.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1550 00495 FOOD 0.00 0.00 124.07 124.07 200.00 02 1550 00644 VEHICLE INSURANCE 0.00 711.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1550 00690 OTHER EXPENSES 9,445.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 1560 001 IO REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,235.00 02 1560 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 59,006.16 63,432.00 66,099.00 66,099.12 0.00 02 1560 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 4,414.30 4,835.48 4,867.00 4,866.70 3,096.00 02 1560 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,856.00 01 1560 00240 INSURANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,052.00 02 1560 00240 INSURANCE 1,726.14 1,687.80 1,317.00 1,316.16 0.00 02 1560 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 76.10 94.79 33.00 32.88 40.00 02 1560 00260 WORKERS COMP 22.93 542.12 463.00 462.73 283.00 02 1560 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 10,360.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1560 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 241.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1560 00410 SUPPLIES AND MA TERJALS 3,838.09 5,117.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 1590 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,273.00 02 1590 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 98,588.54 102,065.49 105,161.00 105,160.56 199,813.00 02 1590 00155 STIPENDS-OTHER 0.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1590 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,475.00 02 1590 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 7,542.11 7,808.03 8,045.00 8,044.56 15,147.00 02 1590 00214 SS TAX STIPENDS-OTHER 0.00 6.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1590 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,313.00 02 1590 00221 TEACH RETIRE, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23,903.00 01 1590 00240 INSURANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,052.00 02 1590 00241 INSURANCE, NON-CERT 5,013.41 5,337.62 5,352.00 5,351.04 28,950.00 02 1590 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 20.00 02 1590 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 151.54 152.16 56.00 53.28 200.00 02 1590 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 0.64 0.00 0.00 135.00 02 1590 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 107.94 873.68 737.00 736.32 1,214.00 02 1590 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 260.00 225.00 300.00 273.15 0.00 02 1590 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 120.37 0.00 800.00 0.00 0.00 02 1590 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 02 1590 00333 IN SERVICE REGISTRATION 0.00 1,195.00 890.00 0.00 0.00 Page: 37 North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function/Object Funds: Salary (OJ)\nOperatin~ (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 1590 00390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES 49,002.35 32,756.30 53,291.00 49,153.50 0.00 02 1590 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 6,944.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1591 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 79,065.04 64,533.06 73,446.60 73,446.06 0.00 02 1591 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 5,786.37 4,673.91 5,487.40 5,486.60 0.00 02 1591 00241 INSURANCE, NON-CERT 4,467.82 4,431.26 3,819.00 3,818.98 0.00 02 1591 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 137.60 96.19 37.00 36.74 0.00 02 1591 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 84.70 561.93 515.00 514.43 0.00 02 1591 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 17,614.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1591 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 1,977.81 1,572.03 133.00 132.43 0.00 02 1592 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 464.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1592 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 35.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1593 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 38,391.78 29,861.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1593 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 2,921.51 2,274.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1593 00240 INSURANCE 856.54 773.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1593 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 59.68 44.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1593 00260 WORKERS COMP 40.71 261.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1593 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 60.24 38.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1593 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 440.97 392.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1594 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 9,817.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1594 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 732.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1594 00240 INSURANCE 357.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1594 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 10.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1594 00260 WORKERS COMP 48.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 1910 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 379,858.62 369,097.14 405,255.00 405,254.24 404,171.00 02 1910 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0.00 0.00 6,900.90 6,900.52 0.00 02 1910 00155 STIPENDS-OTHER 560.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1910 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 27,933.30 27,342.95 29,879.81 29,879.81 30,918.00 02 1910 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 0.00 0.00 508.34 508.34 0.00 02 1910 00214 SS TAX STIPENDS-OTHER 42.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1910 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48,502.00 01 1910 00240 INSURANCE 10,278.18 9,283.44 10,480.00 10,479.10 25,248.00 02 1910 00241 INSURANCE, NON-CERT 0.00 0.00 492.38 492.38 0.00 02 1910 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 590.62 553.66 204.00 203.03 405.00 02 1910 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 3.40 3.40 0.00 02 1910 00260 WORKERS COMP 400.21 3,187.07 2,837.00 2,836.91 2,831.00 02 1910 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 0.00 0.00 48.32 48.32 0.00 Page: 38 North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function/Object Funds: Salary (OJ)\nOperatinl! (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 1910 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 1,225.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1910 00320 RENTAL/LEASE OF COPIERS 91.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1910 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 1,087.76 1,424.10 682.20 682.20 2,800.00 02 1910 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 2,120.00 2,770.00 3,625.00 3,625.00 2,000.00 02 1910 00334 CAR ALLOWANCE-MONTHLY 495.00 495.00 495.00 495.00 495.00 02 1910 00335 INDISTRICT TRAVEL 225.4 I 212.39 296.49 296.49 300.00 02 1910 00341 TELEPHONE 442.81 482.04 458.20 458.20 446.00 02 1910 00342 POSTAGE 333.65 411.06 614.23 614.23 300.00 02 1910 00360 PRINTING AND BINDING 0.00 0.00 37.28 37.28 200.00 02 1910 00380 FOOD SERVICES 0.00 0.00 60.00 60.00 100.00 02 1910 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 12,954.43 14,388.49 I 1,530.73 I 1,530.73 10,432.00 02 1910 00411 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 198.14 97.92 0.00 0.00 200.00 02 1910 00430 LIBRARY BOOKS 0.00 0.00 1,907.95 1,907.95 0.00 02 1910 00440 PERIODICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS 391.98 576.31 352.98 352.98 500.00 02 1910 00495 FOOD 0.00 0.00 409.58 409.58 100.00 02 1910 00499 AWARDS 0.00 0.00 42.60 42.60 0.00 02 1910 00540 EQUIPMENT 0.00 2,051.07 990.39 990.39 0.00 02 1910 00630 DUES AND FEES 25.00 25.00 760.41 760.00 750.00 02 1911 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 6,975.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1911 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 533.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 191 I 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 8.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 191 I 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 4.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 191 I 00370 TUITION 0.00 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 0.00 02 191 I 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 102.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1912 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 11,160.00 15,262.50 36,300.00 19,800.00 17,175.00 02 1912 00150 STIPENDS-WORKSHOPS 360.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1912 00155 STIPENDS-OTHER 0.00 69.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1912 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 853.74 1,167.71 2,777.00 1,514.88 1,315.00 02 1912 00212 SS TAX, STIPENDS 27.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1912 00214 SS TAX STIPENDS-OTHER 0.00 5.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1912 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 1,980.00 0.00 2,061.00 02 1912 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 22.99 47.00 29.76 17.00 02 1912 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 122.65 276.00 158.40 120.00 02 1912 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 0.00 204.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1912 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 905.00 1,343.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1912 00342 POSTAGE 53.28 12.35 100.00 63.04 0.00 Page: 39 North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function/Object Funds: Salary (01)\nOoeratin!l (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 1912 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 2,840.96 4,723.14 3,125.00 450.75 1,700.00 01 1913 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 0.00 14,700.00 14,700.00 14,700.00 02 1913 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 14,500.50 14,700.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1913 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 2,820.85 1,354.18 1,256.58 1,256.58 1,675.00 02 1913 00130 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS 260.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1913 00150 STIPENDS-WORKSHOPS 232.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1913 00155 STIPENDS-OTHER 300.00 375.00 375.00 375.00 0.00 02 1913 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 1,128.79 1,124.55 1,124.11 1,124.11 1,282.00 02 1913 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 215.84 103.54 96.12 96.12 96.00 02 1913 00212 SS TAX, STIPENDS 17.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1913 00214 SS TAX STIPENDS-OTHER 22.96 28.70 28.69 28.69 0.00 02 1913 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,930.00 02 1913 00221 TEACH RETIRE, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 151.00 02 1913 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 14.91 22.82 69.38 7.58 16.00 02 1913 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 3.80 1.98 0.54 0.54 1.00 02 1913 00260 WORKERS COMP 13.77 128.32 106.00 105.78 105.00 02 1913 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 4.46 15.26 8.96 8.82 9.00 02 1913 00342 POSTAGE 14.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1913 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 268.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 1913 00420 TEXTBOOKS 0.00 173.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 OJ 1950 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 0.00 201,727.00 190,372.14 239,063.00 02 1950 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0.00 0.00 139,714.98 129,371.90 107,421.00 02 1950 00150 STIPENDS-WORKSHOPS 0.00 0.00 550.00 0.00 1,100.00 02 1950 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 0.00 15,292.00 12,916.85 18,050.00 02 1950 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 0.00 0.00 9,619.80 9,451.29 2,664.00 02 1950 00212 SS TAX, STIPENDS 0.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 87.00 02 1950 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27,083.00 02 1950 00221 TEACH RETIRE, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,802.00 01 1950 00240 INSURANCE 0.00 0.00 5,626.00 5,625.66 13,885.00 02 1950 00241 INSURANCE, NON-CERT 0.00 0.00 9,004.65 9,002.05 6,639.00 02 1950 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.00 101.07 101.07 226.00 02 1950 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 65.67 64.27 91.00 02 1950 00252 UNEMPLOYMENT COMP,STIPEND 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 02 1950 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 0.00 1,415.00 1,411.76 1,580.00 02 1950 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 0.00 0.00 906.86 905.32 631.00 02 1950 00262 WORKER'S COMP, STIPENDS 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 8.00 Page: 40 North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expe11ditures by Function/Object Funds: Salary (01)\nOperatinl! (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 1950 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 0.00 0.00 63,835.00 59,857.87 49,700.00 02 1950 00320 RENTAL/LEASE OF COPIERS 0.00 0.00 250.00 338.95 0.00 02 1950 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 0.00 0.00 250.00 85.20 200.00 02 1950 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 0.00 80,193.63 8,421.20 1,530.00 02 1950 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 0.00 0.00 115.00 0.00 0.00 02 1950 00337 ADMISSION FEES 0.00 0.00 500.00 119.25 500.00 02 1950 00341 TELEPHONE 0.00 0.00 241.37 238.59 200.00 02 1950 00342 POSTAGE 0.00 0.00 488.00 457.70 160.00 02 1950 00360 PRINTING AND BINDING 0.00 0.00 6.88 6.46 0.00 02 1950 00380 FOOD SERVICES 0.00 0.00 140.00 93.41 0.00 02 1950 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 7,749.11 7,018.52 7,400.00 02 1950 00420 TEXTBOOKS 0.00 0.00 132.00 131.83 0.00 02 1950 00430 LIBRARY BOOKS 0.00 0.00 1,275.00 243.98 400.00 02 1950 00440 PERIODICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 0.00 212.00 26.97 100.00 02 1950 00450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 300.00 02 1950 00451 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 0.00 0.00 40,000.00 40,000.00 0.00 02 1950 00495 FOOD 0.00 0.00 104.01 82.36 500.00 02 1950 00540 EQUIPMENT 0.00 0.00 680.00 0.00 0.00 02 1950 00630 DUES AND FEES 0.00 0.00 20.00 20.00 10.00 02 2110 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0.00 4,350.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2110 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 32,948.30 36,930.07 38,954.00 37,981.94 16,711.00 02 2110 00155 STIPENDS-OTHER 290.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2110 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 332.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2110 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 2,233.61 2,579.45 2,808.00 2,739.49 1,279.00 02 2110 00214 SS TAX STIPENDS-OTHER 22.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2110 00221 TEACH RETIRE, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,006.00 02 2110 00241 INSURANCE, NON-CERT 2,080.87 2,160.00 1,975.00 1,974.10 2,104.00 02 2110 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 6.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2110 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 54.85 55.24 20.00 18.95 16.00 02 2110 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 34.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2110 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 20.69 337.12 272.00 265.84 117.00 02 2110 00327 REPAIRS/MAINT-BUSNEHICLE 0.00 139.18 500.00 23.77 0.00 02 2110 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 294.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 02 2110 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 100.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 0.00 02 2110 00334 CAR ALLOWANCE-MONTHLY 450.00 450.00 450.00 450.00 0.00 02 2110 00341 TELEPHONE 4,533.41 1,240.10 2,590.00 866.06 0.00 Page: 41 -- North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function/Object Funds: Salary (OJ)\nOperatinl! (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 2110 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 194.12 0.00 438.00 77.04 0.00 02 2110 00464 GASOLINE AND DIESEL 84.80 267.05 500.00 202.33 0.00 02 2110 00540 EQUIPMENT 468.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2110 00550 VEHICLES 24,264.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2110 00644 VEHICLE INSURANCE 1,758.00 1,422.00 1,422.00 1,422.00 0.00 01 2120 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 885,880.38 900,703.15 936,481.00 936,480.99 1,016,782.00 02 2120 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 93,177.21 95,530.34 I 12,546.00 112,396.50 115,920.00 02 2120 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 66,823.49 68,251.60 70,474.00 70,473.16 77,929.00 02 2120 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 6,928.12 7,117.18 8,416.00 8,415.96 8,868.00 02 2120 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 122,121.00 02 2120 00221 TEACH RETIRE, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,911.00 01 2120 00240 INSURANCE 19,231.51 19,023.50 19,246.00 19,245.72 47,232.00 02 2120 00241 INSURANCE, NON-CERT 4,302.30 4,621.31 5,536.00 5,248.45 11,042.00 02 2120 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 1,360.50 1,350.90 469.00 468.18 1,034.00 02 2120 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 141.64 142.72 60.00 59.53 116.00 02 2120 00260 WORKERS COMP 935.25 7,711.95 6,558.00 6,555.25 7,129.00 02 2120 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 100.28 807.89 797.00 790.54 812.00 02 2120 00300 PURCHASED SERVICES 0.00 0.00 0.00 (26,530.00 0.00 02 2120 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 0.00 0.00 60,000.00 60,000.00 30,000.00 02 2120 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 44.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2120 00335 INDISTRICT TRAVEL 1,223.19 881.02 1,000.00 932.30 I,000.00 02 2120 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 1,320.11 2,074.93 1,587.19 1,200.16 900.00 02 2120 00440 PERIODICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS 277.00 175.72 150.00 77.00 100.00 02 2120 00540 EQUIPMENT 265.00 140.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2120 00630 DUES AND FEES 195.00 195.00 197.81 0.00 225.00 02 2123 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 1,100.00 0.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 0.00 02 2123 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 0.00 1,100.00 500.00 0.00 0.00 02 2123 00390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,800.00 02 2123 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 11,733.53 14,419.97 10,582.00 10,412.04 28,700.00 02 2123 00451 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 02 2123 00495 FOOD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 02 2130 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 79,620.73 89,890.99 92,560.00 92,559.36 99,225.00 02 2130 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 5,889.57 6,663.71 6,862.00 6,861.44 7,591.00 02 2130 00221 TEACH RETIRE, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,907.00 02 2130 00241 INSURANCE, NON-CERT 3,069.12 2,964.38 3,004.00 3,003.72 8,416.00 02 2130 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 114.92 134.44 47.00 46.31 99.00 Page: 42 North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function/Object Funds: Sa/arv (01)\nOperatin~ (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 2130 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 89.99 758.38 648.00 647.76 695.00 02 2130 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 334.44 220.00 298.00 220.00 1,000.00 02 2130 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 312.50 378.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2130 00333 1NSERV1CE REGISTRATION 332.00 100.00 100.00 0.00 400.00 02 2130 00334 CAR ALLOWANCE-MONTHLY 700.00 720.00 720.00 720.00 720.00 02 2130 00410 SUPPLIES AND MA TERJALS 1,272.37 2,365.63 3,118.00 2,771.57 1,990.00 02 2130 00495 FOOD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 02 2130 00540 EQUIPMENT 715.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 2140 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 114,174.00 149,239.55 190,315.80 190,315.80 165,676.00 OJ 2140 00115 CERTIFIED ADMIN 57,153.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2140 00155 STIPENDS-OTHER 0.00 1,484.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2140 00210 SOCIAL SECURJTY TAX 12,764.66 11,059.88 14,232.81 14,232.81 15,423.00 02 2140 00214 SS TAX STIPENDS-OTHER 0.00 I 13.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2140 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,192.00 01 2140 00240 INSURANCE 3,049.21 2,898.58 3,914.20 3,913.53 6,695.00 02 2140 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 265.88 226.10 95.76 95.22 202.00 02 2140 00260 WORKERS COMP 180.56 1,421.23 1,332.43 1,332.43 1,412.00 02 2140 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 64,752.11 60,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2140 00334 CAR ALLOWANCE-MONTHLY 540.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 2150 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 379,296.64 351,079.40 348,062.00 341,935.59 394,374.00 02 2150 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 129,737.76 145,778.08 167,812.90 162,813.67 140,465.00 02 2150 00210 SOCIAL SECURJTY TAX 38,213.15 37,418.76 38,016.71 36,847.29 43,692.00 02 2150 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68,535.00 01 2150 00240 INSURANCE 10,380.50 8,712.43 8,579.00 8,509.68 31,560.00 02 2150 00240 INSURANCE 0.00 3,028.11 3,616.49 3,616.49 8,416.00 02 2150 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 746.32 743.89 255.27 254.94 574.00 02 2150 00260 WORKERS COMP 431.62 4,313.37 3,568.63 3,568.00 4,002.00 02 2150 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 0.00 14,220.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2150 00410 SUPPLIES AND MA TERJALS 442.35 416.37 1,105.00 747.33 400.00 01 2160 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 60,061.50 69,674.64 72,655.00 72,654.48 76,288.00 02 2160 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 7,281.78 0.00 1,680.00 0.00 3,840.00 02 2160 00210 SOCIAL SECURJTY TAX 5,115.53 5,318.14 5,602.00 5,472.22 9,010.00 02 2160 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 202.00 0.00 18,649.00 01 2160 00240 INSURANCE 1,713.44 1,688.32 1,689.00 1,688.40 4,208.00 02 2160 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 104.70 104.52 39.00 36.48 119.00 02 2160 00260 WORKERS COMP 69.98 599.01 1,021.00 1,006.26 824.00 Page: 43 North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function/Object Funds: Salary (01)\nOperatin,: (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 2160 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 11,234.75 43,972.08 80,068.00 80,067.98 75,000.00 02 2160 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 0.00  0.00 250.00 02 2160 00540 EQUIPMENT 0.00 284.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 2190 00115 CERTIFIED ADMIN 0.00 50,624.02 59,782.08 59,782.08 59,783.00 02 2190 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0.00 33,671.74 98,284.38 98,217.78 88,574.00 02 2190 00150 STIPENDS-WORKSHOPS 160.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2190 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0.00 3,872.73 4,573.22 4,573.22 4,560.00 02 2190 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 0.00 2,476.39 7,345.73 7,345.04 6,777.00 02 2190 00212 SS TAX, STIPENDS 12.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2190 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,153.00 02 2190 00221 TEACH RETIRE, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,630.00 01 2190 00240 INSURANCE 0.00 703.60 844.92 844.32 2,104.00 02 2190 00241 INSURANCE, NON-CERT 0.00 1,758.16 5,440.69 5,440.65 12,844.00 02 2190 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 75.90 34.82 34.82 60.00 02 2190 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 0.00 55.94 51.00 50.67 88.00 02 2190 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 404.92 423.89 423.39 417.00 02 2190 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 0.00 309.15 689.27 689.08 621.00 02 2190 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 0.00 2,800.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 02 2190 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 0.00 85.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2190 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION 0.00 41.60 440.00 136.80 325.00 02 2190 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 698.00 8.00 360.00 358.91 300.00 02 2190 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 0.00 50.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2190 00334 CAR ALLOWANCE-MONTHLY 0.00 495.00 540.00 540.00 540.00 02 2190 00341 TELEPHONE 0.00 47.60 49.75 28.37 50.00 02 2190 00342 POSTAGE 689.89 743.73 161.14 0.00 220.00 02 2190 00360 PRINTING AND BINDING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,844.00 02 2190 00380 FOOD SERVICES 172.00 126.85 95.00 0.00 0.00 02 2190 00394 SECURITY OFFICER SERVICES 0.00 0.00 I,060.00 1,057.50 1,100.00 02 2190 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 2,498.20 2,034.75 2,933.11 2,200.49 1,865.00 02 2190 00495 FOOD 0.00 0.00 55.00 52.30 0.00 02 2190 00630 DUES AND FEES 0.00 0.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 02 2193 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 253.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2193 00540 EQUIPMENT 7,260.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2195 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 0.00 26,192.15 193,776.00 192,976.92 0.00 02 2195 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 0.00 2,003.88 14,520.00 14,447.89 0.00 02 2195 00241 INSURANCE, NON-CERT 0.00 2,180.29 11,911.00 11,905.37 0.00 Page: 44 North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function/Object Funds: Salary (01)\nOperatin~ (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 2195 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 0.00 39.31 98.00 96.45 0.00 02 2195 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 0.00 209.66 1,370.00 1,350.53 0.00 01 2210 00115 CERTIFIED ADMIN 546,426.72 628,590.25 689,778.96 689,778.02 729,010.00 02 2210 00115 CERTIFIED ADMIN 17,855.32 46,399.08 23,912.28 23,912.28 0.00 02 2210 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 173,135.14 190,358.05 196,705.74 182,704.65 193,739.00 02 2210 00125 NON-CERTIFIED ADMIN 43,515.80 2,229.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2210 00130 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS 0.00 437.80 6,758.12 1,950.20 10,125.00 02 2210 00150 STIPENDS-WORKSHOPS 19,755.00 23,310.00 27,938.04 10,975.00 35,890.00 02 2210 00151 STIPENDS NON-CERTIFIED 0.00 560.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2210 00155 STIPENDS-OTHER 0.00 4,770.00 5,094.00 4,240.00 2,100.00 02 2210 00210 SOCIAL SECURJTY TAX 41,241.91 50,718.98 54,606.78 53,510.22 59,030.00 02 2210 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 16,330.59 14,437.29 15,589.76 13,966.03 13,870.00 02 2210 00212 SS TAX, STIPENDS 1,541.66 1,783.04 2,563.85 839.37 3,226.00 02 2210 00213 SS TAX STIPENDS NON CERT 0.00 42.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2210 00214 SS TAX STIPENDS-OTHER 0.00 364.90 1,509.00 324.38 I 15.00 02 2210 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 91,315.00 02 2210 00221 TEACH RETIRE, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 1,680.00 0.00 21,430.00 01 2210 00240 INSURANCE 9,123.35 10,350.18 10,961.04 10,960.80 30,718.00 02 2210 00240 INSURANCE 351.70 844.08 422.10 422.10 0.00 02 2210 00241 rNSURANCE, NON-CERT 8, I 71.60 7,746.12 9,444.55 6,812.24 15,194.00 02 2210 00250 . UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 883.34 1,057.26 493.32 390.77 771.00 02 2210 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 335.26 286.31 197.27 98.43 181.00 02 2210 00252 UNEMPLOYMENT COMP,STIPEND 0.00 0.00 101.50 0.46 189.00 02 2210 00260 WORKERS COMP 574.81 5,800.13 5,323.99 5,129.97 5,388.00 02 2210 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 238.47 1,612.57 1,438.61 1,285.51 1,250.00 02 2210 00262 WORKER'S COMP, STIPENDS 0.00 0.00 170.00 4.86 453.00 01 2210 00290 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 276.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2210 00290 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 0.00 0.00 279.00 279.00 0.00 02 2210 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 75.00 1,597.22 6,330.50 4,531.00 7,144.00 02 2210 00318 RENTAL OF EQUIP \u0026amp; VEHICLE 0.00 0.00 311.24 311.24 0.00 02 2210 00319 RENTAL OF LAND \u0026amp; BUILDrNG 50.00 300.00 850.00 50.00 100.00 02 2210 00320 RENT AL/LEASE OF COPIERS 175.45 411.15 1,222.38 1,107.78 0.00 02 2210 00326 REPAIRS/MArNT-EQUIP 2,875.39 722.21 1,663.74 1,097.85 1,179.00 02 2210 00331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION I 84.45 0.00 1,272.00 0.00 I,450.00 02 2210 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 5,030.31 13,372.I 1 41,642.31 19,284.96 11,429.00 02 2210 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION I5,138.88 13,677.37 12,150.66 9,914.00 6,935.00 Page: 45 - - North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function/Object Funds: Salary (OJ)\nOperatinf( (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 2210 00334 CAR ALLOWANCE-MONTHLY 3,215.00 4,230.00 3,945.00 4,435.00 3,960.00 02 2210 00335 INDISTRICT TRAVEL 147.80 133.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2210 00341 TELEPHONE 6,367.51 1,795.07 1,965.56 1,902.05 350.00 02 2210 00342 POSTAGE 941.94 1,389.93 2,133.07 1,352.14 400.00 02 2210 00360 PRINTING AND BINDING 7,592.48 11,542.45 6,000.00 2,926.44 9,800.00 02 2210 00380 FOOD SERVICES 1,286.76 2,804.49 5,412.00 4,708.52 0.00 02 2210 00390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES 0.00 0.00 1,079.00 843.02 1,325.00 02 2210 00395 ARCH/ENG SERVICES 0.00 0.00 800.00 0.00 0.00 02 2210 00398 STAFF DEVELOPMENT 2,400.00 4,466.23 16,032.61 4,869.48 16,786.00 02 2210 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 51,276.44 48,801.20 53,163.42 31,766.06 24,122.00 02 2210 00420 TEXTBOOKS 564.45 0.00 6,370.75 4,325.95 0.00 02 2210 00440 PERIODICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS 0.00 437.44 500.00 275.00 0.00 02 2210 00450 AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 7,362.00 7,221.43 0.00 02 2210 00451 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 0.00 0.00 1,202.21 1,197.89 10,890.00 02 2210 00464 GASOLINE AND DIESEL 500.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2210 00490 OTHER SUPPLIES/MA TERI A LS 0.00 0.00 366.85 366.85 0.00 02 2210 00495 FOOD 0.00 0.00 2,907.59 1,451.91 3,154.00 02 2210 00499 AWARDS 0.00 0.00 89.20 89.20 150.00 02 2210 00540 EQUIPMENT 3,339.21 1,559.81 0.00 0.00 9,500.00 02 2210 00630 DUES AND FEES 6,445.00 7,953.00 9,797.00 9,416.00 4,692.00 02 2210 00644 . VEHICLE INSURANCE 879.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2210 00670 INDIRECT COSTS 0.00 0.00 3,841.00 0.00 0.00 02 2211 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 0.00 221.48 1,452.00 1,369.62 1,300.00 02 221 I 00342 POSTAGE 34.09 0.00 99.98 0.00 50.00 02 2211 00360 PRINTING AND BINDING 0.00 125.24 0.00 0.00 200.00 02 2211 00380 FOOD SERVICES 0.00 113.60 1,100.00 890.00 800.00 02 2211 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 671.88 1,098.41 2,912.02 2,912.02 2,400.00 02 2211 00495 FOOD 0.00 0.00 500.00 430.00 300.00 02 2211 00630 DUES AND FEES 4,082.50 0.00 3,200.00 227.09 2,450.00 02 2212 00150 STIPENDS-WORKSHOPS 0.00 0.00 1,900.00 1,900.00 0.00 02 2212 00212 SS TAX, STIPENDS 0.00 0.00 146.00 145.35 0.00 02 2212 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.00 3.00 2.85 0.00 02 2212 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 0.00 16.00 15.20 0.00 01 2215 00115 CERTIFIED ADMIN 29,465.13 15,180.44 15,636.00 15,635.28 15,635.00 02 2215 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 5,149.97 11,007.52 11,460.96 11,460.96 2,400.00 02 2215 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 2,187.29 1,172.23 1,114.68 1,114.68 1,196.00 Page: 46 North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expenditures by Function/Object Funds: Salary (OJ)\nOperatinl! (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 2215 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 394.04 842.07 876.70 876.70 184.00 02 2215 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,876.00 02 2215 00221 TEACH RETIRE, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 288.00 01 2215 00240 INSURANCE 410.25 237.31 211.00 210.96 841.00 02 2215 00241 INSURANCE, NON-CERT 119.72 297.88 422.00 421.80 1,052.00 02 2215 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 46.18 29.17 9.17 9.17 16.00 02 2215 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 7.95 16.45 6.67 6.67 2.00 02 2215 00260 WORKERS COMP 23.87 169.09 110.71 110.71 109.00 02 2215 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 5.48 90.02 81.11 81.11 17.00 02 2215 00334 CAR ALLOWANCE-MONTHLY 0.00 540.00 540.00 540.00 540.00 02 2216 00410 SUPPLIES AND MA TERJALS 585.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2217 00380 FOOD SERVICES 222.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2217 00410 SUPPLIES AND MA TERJALS 836.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2218 00130 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS 0.00 0.00 255.00 255.00 255.00 02 2218 00150 STIPENDS-WORK.SHOPS 0.00 0.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 02 2218 00212 SS TAX, STIPENDS 0.00 0.00 25.00 22.93 23.00 02 2218 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.17 1.00 02 2218 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 0.00 4.00 2.10 4.00 02 2218 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 22,606.00 11,615.54 29,415.00 6,146.00 16,562.00 02 2218 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 12,335.09 4,783.09 17,000.00 7,394.96 8,415.00 02 2218 00360 PRINTING AND BINDING 0.00 909.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2218 00380 FOOD SERVICES 0.00 661.33 5,000.00 4,319.08 5,000.00 02 2218 00390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2218 00398 STAFF DEVELOPMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,000.00 02 2218 00410 SUPPLIES AND MA TERJALS 2,430.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2218 00450 AUDIOVISUAL MA TERJALS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 02 2219 00130 SUBSTITUTE TEACHERS 0.00 0.00 1,760.00 0.00 1,760.00 02 2219 00150 STIPENDS-WORKSHOPS 840.00 0.00 3,099.00 1,160.00 2,000.00 02 2219 00210 SOCIAL SECURJTY TAX 0.00 0.00 135.00 0.00 135.00 02 2219 00212 SS TAX, STIPENDS 64.26 0.00 242.00 88.74 153.00 02 2219 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 0.00 0.00 16.00 0.56 2.00 02 2219 00260 WORKERS COMP 0.00 0.00 25.00 8.12 14.00 02 2219 00310 PROFESSIONAL \u0026amp; TECH SERV 120.00 0.00 4,300.00 3,300.00 1,000.00 02 2219 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 1,132.00 149.31 750.00 02 2219 00390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES 0.00 1,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2219 00398 STAFF DEVELOPMENT 0.00 0.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 536.00 Page: 47 North Little Rock Public Schools 1993-1997 Expe11ditures by Function/Object Funds: Salary (01)\nOperatinf! (02)\nDebt Service (04) 93-94 94-95 95-96 95-96 96-97 Fun Fnct Object Description Expenditures Expenditures Budget Expenditures Budget 02 2219 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 0.00 1,382.83 1,368.00 276.14 744.00 02 2219 00495 FOOD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 01 2220 00110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 570,034.04 559,496.69 576,424.00 576,423.60 651,417.00 02 2220 00120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED 201,009.31 200,107.85 207,664.00 205,312.45 238,501.00 02 2220 00150 STIPENDS-WORKSHOPS 710.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2220 00155 STIPENDS-OTHER 0.00 831.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2220 00210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 42,588.80 41,857.95 42,806.00 42,796.15 49,836.00 02 2220 00211 SS TAX, NON-CERTIFIED 14,902.64 14,856.31 15,876.00 15,269.38 18,245.00 02 2220 00212 SS TAX, STIPENDS 54.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2220 00214 SS TAX STIPENDS-OTHER 0.00 63.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2220 00220 TEACHER RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 78,169.00 02 2220 00221 TEACH RETIRE, NON CERT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28,621.00 01 2220 00240 INSURANCE 13,265.83 13,057.90 13,505.00 13,504.67 33,664.00 02 2220 00241 INSURANCE, NON-CERT 8,251.35 7,763.26 7,273.00 6,428.79 13,059.00 02 2220 00250 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 877.59 840.47 291.00 288.83 635.00 02 2220 00251 UNEMPLOY COMP, NON CERT 308.71 299.57 114.00 109.66 239.00 02 2220 00260 WORKERS COMP 593.70 4,820.80 4,039.00 4,034.91 4,561.00 02 2220 00261 WORKERS COMP, NON-CERT 230.38 1,704.46 1,493.00 1,443.96 1,670.00 02 2220 00320 RENT AL/LEASE OF COPIERS 0.00 1,158.02 402.57 0.00 1,500.00 02 2220 00326 REPAIRS/MAINT-EQUIP 499.25 313.90 507.08 281.79 860.00 02 2220 00332 TRAVEL EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 02 2220 00333 INSERVICE REGISTRATION 0.00 170.00 119.00 119.00 150.00 02 2220 00334 CAR ALLOWANCE-MONTHLY 540.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02 2220 00335 INDISTRICT TRAVEL 440.60 430.56 500.00 358.14 1,050.00 02 2220 00341 TELEPHONE 131.97 113.86 75.89 36.69 100.00 02 2220 00342 POSTAGE 0.00 176.97 126.83 48.00 205.00 02 2220 00360 PRINTING AND BINDING 0.00 0.00 545.73 574.83 111.00 02 2220 00390 OTHER PURCHASED SERVICES 0.00 2,386.82 2,314.75 2,311.20 10,120.00 02 2220 00398 STAFF DEVELOPMENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 02 2220 00410 SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 9,599.19 12,893.44 18,371.70 18,866.31 8,005.00 02 2220 00420 TEXTBOOKS 0.00 0.00 321.11 321.11 0.00 02 2220 00430 LIBRARY BOOKS 54,653.22 55,116.50 47,227.65 46,640.56 55,683.00 02 2220 00440 PERIODICALS/SUBSCRIPTIONS I 0,\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_644","title":"Little Rock Schools: Mitchell Elementary","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1990/2005"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Mitchell Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","School enrollment","Educational statistics","Educational planning","School management and organization"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock Schools: Mitchell Elementary"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/644"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nT he Creative Dramatics Program at Mitchell encourages self expression through writing, speaking and per- forming creative dramatics, all of which enhance learning by personalizing the dramatic experiences. This, in turn, creates sensitivity toward all individuals and instills an appreciation for their uniqueness. At Mitchell we provide learning experiences that stimulate our students to communicate their intellectual, emotional, social and creative strengths. Students acquire an understanding of the five components of the Creative Dramatics Program: voice/diction, movement, costuming, makeup, and written script and/or adapted text. Self-confidence is promoted through the discipline of movement and dance, while a sense of community is reinforced through cooperative performing experiences. Both drama and dance are used as tools for expressing a culture's attitudes and beliefs. Students learn that drama mirrors life and they, like the characters, make choices which create significant change. The Mitchell Merry Makers,\" a drama club that meets during lunchtime, in addition to plays, puppetry and reader's theatre, provide diverse opportunities for student participation. An after school program includes ballet and creative dance. Mitchell's Creative Dramatics Program is interwoven into an excellent elementary core curriculum taught by a highly qualified staff. At Mitchell, students get a gentle push onto the stage of life. It's a setting for the future. Little Rock School District Mitchell Creative Dramatics Elementary School First Class Schools For World Class KidsMulti-Sensory Approaches Enhance Student Interest In Creative Dramatics SPECIAL ATTRACTIONS Creative dramatics is expressive and transforms concepts into personal meanings for children of all ages. An awareness of self and others evolves through these programs. Our multi-sensory approach to creative dramatics promotes student interest and participation. Students have an opportunity to engage in puppetry, movement and music, costuming, makeup, text adaptations, improvisations, creative scene work, oral reading and story telling, artwork in designing sets including backdrop painting, prop construction and shadow boxes. Special programs include an extended day program offering a homework center, ballet, tap and creative dance, play production, sewing, cooking, giri/boy scouts and student council. Saturday enrichment activities include collaboration with community service organizations.  Full-time Creative Dramatics Specialist Extended Day Program Care Program - Supervised activities until 5:30 P.M. Academic Support Program for reading and math Gifted and Talented Program Speech therapy Resource classes Full-time counseling program Low pupil-to-staff ratio Pre-K Program with imaginative play Special Activities Special activities include The Mitchell Merrymakers\", a drama club, and the Mitchell Children's Ballet (after school program). To further enhance the dramatics theme, students attend performances such as THE NUTCRACKER ballet and Arkansas Arts Center Children's Theatre Performances. *Mitchell Creative Dramatics Elementary School 2410 Battery Street, Little Rock, AR 72206 501/324-2415 TO SCHEDULE A SPEAKER FOR YOUR GROUP OR ORGANIZATION, CALL 324-2515 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, CALL OR VISIT THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ASSIGNMENT OFFICE 501 SHERMAN, LITTLE ROCK, AR 501/324-2272 OR CALL OUR INCENTIVE SCHOOL HOTLINE, 501/688-3085 Parent Workshops - Special training sessions, family puppetry activities and computer check-out materials Comprehensive nursing * Additional Programs - Saturday enrichment activities Excellent Core Curriculum Mitchell Creative Dramatics Elementary School is a part of the LRSD Incentive School Program. Incentive schools receive extra financial resources which allow for big results in basic skills education and enrichment. !T]aJb^ n 1^ Pc^-h 'Ty]!'/xJuctSL. 'PTA Qb Mil-d^-(/^- 3.i/c\u0026gt; Qi.tt\u0026amp; ^1 ttl(. liaJ- yc\\:x c\u0026gt;(^ C//^ c^/ -X 4z /-tv uu-h \u0026gt; /Ccc^^Great News for Mitchell Academy Parents and Students! Please come to a meeting for Mitchell Academy parents to hear the exciting plans for a new school for our students! We need for you to bring your ideas to a meeting on Tuesday, September 29, at 6:00 p.m. Please come to the Mitchell Academy cafeteria, 2410 South Battery, and share your thoughts.77 z-A MITCHELL SCHOOL ENROLLMENT GRADE BLACK WHITE OTHER TOTAL % BLACK LEVEL M F M F M F 4 yrs 7 6 3 4 20 65% K 17 12 3 3 35 83% 1 19 25 2 46 96% 2 24 17 3 2 46 89% 3 24 14 1 2 41 93% 4 28 16 1 1 46 96% 5 14 16 1 31 97% 6 24 13 1 38 97% SC* 7 2 9 100% TOTAL 164 121 12 15 312 91% PERCENT 53% 39% 4% 5% 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 B 0 T % Blk B W 0 T % Blk B W 0 T % Blk 220 19 0 239 92% 183 24 0 207 88% 285 27 0 312 91%I. i' EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES - W-  -.r? \u0026lt;  T activity Drill Team H H MALE JL 7 B _ FEMALE 2 B L A HALE 1 . C K FEMALE 20 1_E____ O T HALE 1 I P B FEMALE W H MALE : T B__ XEiSAiE. BPOMBORII B L A MALE 1 . C K FEMALE OTHER HALE rBMA3bE. OrFICERB/LEADERBHIP VOemOVS. T E FEMALE BLACK FEMALE 0 T MALE IB R  female TOTAL 23 'Drama Club 40 45 94 _Flag-Hnnl tor.s- /Fire Marshalls ^~Peer Tutoring Video Club Boy .Smuts------ ' Cub Scouts Girl Scouts * Wehnlns TOTAL 12 15 20 16 9 18 12 12 1Q2 100 12 20 14 14 12,1^ E M B E R 8 H  T.JLfi. W H JI\u0026amp;IiS. 2 4 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 5 8 2 6 1 1 1 9 7 I 1 i 1 1 i 1 1 1 I I 1 4 3 7 This report should include membership information, regarding sponsors and officer positions. In add_ members of committees. Include information In addition, include student Duplicate as needed. Complete and return to Planning, Research, and Evaluation office. jl,. i\n14 I D A'  ' . x\u0026gt; c(/ f*\" t V i' rt* i ? SCHOOL: GRADES: PRINCIPAL SCHOOL PROFILE 1991-92 t ? ? J }t 'f Ii MITCHELL 4 YEAR OLD- 6 DONITA HUDSPETH - 7  Race/Gender WE ASSISTANT PRlNGIPAL(S) (y. '.  - Race/Gerider f' NA  A T  t I 1\nI -1 - V ''-  .T\" \"i't - ' TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Personnel\n- Certified Staff - Support Staff - Staff Changes (After October 1) 2. Enrollment\n- School - Special Services - Class/Course 3 . Attendance Data\n- Certified Staff - Support Staff - Students 4. Extended Educational Programs 5. Honors/Awards (Schoolwide) ( 6. Committees/Parental Involvement 7. Extracurricular Activities (Including Student Monitors) 8. Student Achievement/Assessment Data t 9. Retention Data 10. Secondary Subject Area Courses Failed 11. Graduation Data (High School Only) 1 12. Staff Development Activities - Certified Staff - Support Staff 13. Quarterly Discipline Management Report 14. Map of School Plant J i iVi -ir JK' w- t A I i LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT A SCHOOL PROFILE 1991,-92 4 i i I SCHOOL: MITCHELL I GRADES: 4 YEAR OLD- 6 1 PRINCIPAL: DONITA HUDSPETH Race/Gender WF r\ni ASSISTANT PRINGIPAL(S) Race/Gehder NA : K a 'V T-S' 2.-. A\u0026lt; / '4 '80 X CERTIFIED PERSONNEL 4 POSITION WHITE male FEMALE BLACK MALE FEMALE other MALE female TOTAL Adwinlstratorfs) 1 1 Classroom Teachers I 7 1 16 Counselor(s) 1 1 Librarianfs) 1 1 Reading (Compensatory/ Remedial) 1 1 Mathematics (Compensatory/ Remedial) 1 1 Gifted (Elementary onlv) 1 1 Speech Therapist 1 1 Other Art 1 1 Music 1 1 - TOTAL P.E. Auxilllary Teacher Resource Teacher 12 13 28 1 1 1 2 2 2 Advanced Placement/Honors/Gifted/Enriched (Secondary Only) Of the secondary classroom teachers listed above, indicate the number teaching AP, Honors, Gifted, and/or Enriched classes. ACADEMIC AREA (English, History, etc) WHITE MALE FEMALE black MALE OTHER TOTAL male FEMALE ,i TOTAL The official date for staffing information is October 1, 1991. Complete and return to Planning, Research, and Evaluation office.e\u0026gt; '.'i POSITION W H MALE Attendance Clerk Cafeteria Workers Custodians Instructional Aides Media Clerk Nurse Reaistrar Secretary Security Officerfs) Social Workerfs) Superyjsion Aides Other total SUPPORT PERSONNEL T E FEMALE BLACK MALE FEMALE 15 OTHER MALE FEMALE TOTAL 11 .1 I- 21 3 3 1 1 2 3 5 1 7 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 i I i ! i The official date for staffing information is October 1, 1991. \u0026gt; I I i t 1 4 Complete and return to Planning, Research, and Evaluation office.I STAFF CHANGES (After October 1) I. Added/Deleted Certified Staff Positions During Current School Year POSITION Added Deleted BLACK WHITE OTHER Total M F M F M F 4 Year Old Teacher 1 1 1 Resource 1 1 1 TOTAL 2 Added/Deleted Support Staff Positions During Current School Year POSIT IO N Added Deleted BLACK M F InstriirM'nnal AiHo n 2 1 WHITE M F 1 OTHER M F Total 4 i Instructional Alde-4 Year Old 1 1 1 ( TOTAL 5 2 2 1 5 Duplicate if needed. )* STUDENTS RETAINED At the secondary level, include only those students retained at grade Do not include failures of individual courses. level WHITE RETAINED GRADE LEVEL MALE 1 FEMALE BLACK MALE 2 FEMALE other TOTAL HALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE 1 K 1 3 i i 2 3 2 1 2 i 2 TOTAL L 1 6 0 0 2 1 5 1 PERCENT .005 .005 .02% .019% .029 .014 0 0 Provide the most current information SECONDARY SUBJECT AREA COURSES FAILED WHITE SUBJECT AREA Grade Male Female BLACK Male Female OTHER Male Female Male TOTAL Female English 7/10 English 8/11 English 9/12. Math History/Social Studies__________ Science i Provide the most current information GRADUATION DATA FOR 1990-91 SCHOOL YEAR (HIGH SCHOOL ONLY) 1 TOTAL NUMBER OF STUDENTS GRADUATING: BM BF WM WF OM OF TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL I Duplicate as needed. Complete and return to Planning, Research, and Evaluation office.1  { CLASS ENROLLMENT (Elementairy Schools Only) 1991-92 SCHOOL MITCHELL PRINCIPAL DONTTA HnnSPF.TH I GRADE 4 YR. ROOM 35 TEACHER'S GENDER/RACE F W WHITE MALE 3 K 1 F W 2 K 2 F 1 1 3 F W 0 1 4 F B 0 CLASS ENROLLMENT FEMALE 4 3 0 2 0 BLACK MALE 7 9 8 8 11 OTHER 2 . 104 F B 1 2 12 2 106 F B 2 0 12 3 107 F B 1 1 13 3 103 F W 0 1 11 4 201 F B 0 0 15 4 204 F B 1 1 13 5 205 F B 0 0 7 5 6 6 SC TOTAL 202 206 203 108 F F F F B B W B 0 1 0 0 12 1 0 0 0 15 1 13 11 7 164 FEMALE 6 4 8 13 12 8 9 1 7 8 8 9 1 5 8 2 121 MALE FEMALE TOTAL 20 18 17 23 23 23 23 22 19 23 23 16 15 19 19 9 312 ( 1 I ? 1 S ! I i I I education, etc.). Do not include teachers of pull-out classes (art, music, physical List each class separately. The official date for enrollment data is October 1, 1991. Duplicate if needed. A A AI  Mt\nSCHOOL ENROIiIiMENT GRADE LEVEL WHITE MALE FEMALE BLACK MALE FEMALE OTHER MALE FEMALE TOTAL 4 Year 20 SC ^OTAL 12 15 17 19 24 28 14 24 164 12 25 17 14 16 16 13 121 35 46 46 41 46 31 38 312 PERCENT ENROLLMENT - SPECIAL SERVICES white BLACK OTHER SPECIAL ED. Self Contained FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE TOTAL Resource Room Speech/Vision or Hearing Imoaired, etc. Indirect Services *GIFTED/TALENTED REMEDIAL/ COMPENSATORY TOTAL PERCENT 1% Ik 57 96 27 42 14% la 20. 18 86 146 46% K 1 2 3 4 5 6 * 3 3 0 3 1 1 0 1 0  1 1 1 1 4 4 3 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 4 n 7 6 7 2 9 7 1 2 1 0 0 30% : 2 1 1 0 Q  a 0 0 0 0  0 a 0 0 0 0 0  3 Include ONLY those students who have been identified as Gifted by the G/T office and are receiving G/T instruction. The official date for enrollment data is October 1, 1991. Do not compute the percentages. Complete and return to Planning, Research, and Evaluation office.i\nI: BCHOQL eOMMIWBBa/PARBHTXL mVOLVEMBin\nA COMMITTEE Blraclal Conunlttee Parent Teacher Assoc Xl. Parent Workshops ^Please Specify Others) T.E___ 1 BKPLOYBBB BLACK t\u0026gt;LE FEMALE 1 1 OTHER WHITE FRREMTB ! PATRONS BLACK MALE 0 FEMALE 0 HftLE FEMALE 3 (FIG' MALE 1 IRES female 2 !^0T OTHER WHITE orFICERB BLACK MftltE. FEMALE VAI LA BLE 7 MALE ST) FEMALE FEMALE MALE FEHALB W B 1 1 2 3 5 I    / i- .- 7   0 T B B R 1 X I List membership of all school committees, Including committees composed .^Note: of parents/patrons, staff members, or a combination of parents and staff. iSHave available upon request documentation concerning physical Involvement. ^Examples of such documentation are the VIPS' Slgn-ln Roster, notices of various yschool functions. Items of publicity about parent participation, etc. It Is not necessary to provide monitors with a sign-in sheet of attendance at PTA neetings. . Duplicate as needed.  * ^Complet e and return to Planning, Research, and Evaluation office.  IOFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING 201 EAST MARKHAM STREET, SUITE 510 HERITAGE WEST BUILDING LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 To\nFrom: Incentive School Principals Desegregation Monitoring Team: Ann Brown, Melissa Guldin, Connie Hickman, Margie Powell, and Horace Smith Date: October 28, 1991 Subject: Additional Documentation Needed for Monitoring Visit During further review of the Incentive School Monitoring Guide, it became evident that additional data would be needed for our site visit. We will need the following information: - SEPS - curriculum guides - extended day schedule - counseling documentation - field trip documentation - learning style inventories - peer tutoring documentation - mentor/role model documentation - calender of neighborhood events - Boy \u0026amp; Girl Scout membership lists - student evaluations (forms \u0026amp; findings) We look forward to visiting your school. If you have any questions and/or concerns, please do not hesitate to call on your team leader, designated on the monitoring schedule, at 376-6200. cc: Dr. Ruth Steele James JenningsOFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING 201 EAST MARKHAM STREET, SUITE 510 HERITAGE WEST BUILDING LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 To: From: Incentive School Principals Desegregation Monitoring Team: Ann Brown, Melissa Guldin, Connie Hickman, Margie Powell, and Horace Smith Date: October 28, 1991 Subject: Additional Documentation Needed for Monitoring Visit During further review of the Incentive School Monitoring Guide, it became evident that additional data would be needed for our site visit. We will need the following information: - SEP'S - curriculum guides - extended day schedule - counsehng documentation - field trip documentation - learning style inventories - peer tutoring documentation - mentor/role model documentation - calender of neighborhood events - Boy \u0026amp; Girl Scout membership lists - student evaluations (forms \u0026amp; findings) We look forward to visiting your school. If you have any questions and/or concerns, please do not hesitate to call on your team leader, designated on the monitoring schedule, at 376-6200. cc: Dr. Ruth Steele James JenningsEXTENDED BPPCATIONM, PROGRAMS PROGRAM GRADE BM BP WM MF OM OF  1I \"43^ J ' 1 ( i f TOTAL Governor's School AEGIS Bovs^ State Girls' State Summer Laureate (2-3) 1 3 0 0 0 0 4 Odyssey of the Mind Math Olympiad (WILL BE UN L. kTER) Others (Please Specify) Extended Dav 1-6 106 90 Saturday Program 1-6 14 Art Center 2-3 209 2/ -30 5 UALR Summer Gifted 2-1^ ' 14 2 1 2 2 4 2 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Summer Camp 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 TOTAL List any educational programs that are conducted outside the normal school day. Include the most current information. Complete and return to Planning, Research, and Evaluation office. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ARKANSAS MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS 1990-91 INDIVIDUAL SCHOOL SUMMARY GRADE 3 SCHOOL: MITCHELL ELEMENTARY READING 1988 1989 1990 1991 1988 MATHEMATICS 1989 1990 1991 ALL STUDENTS No. Tested No. Passed 20 17 36 31 23 20 28 26 20 19 36 29 23 21 28 28 Percent Passed BLACK MALES No. Passed Percent Passed BLACK FEMALES No. Passed Percent Passed AS. in 10 lAQ. 86 14 .28 15 88 87 86 12 92 93 10 83 12 100 95 80 10 100 81 14 88 12 71 91 100 12 92 100 12 100 12 100 3 6 4 7 WHITE MALES No. Passed 2 4 3 1 1 3 1 1 Percent Passed 75 67 50 100 100 100 50 100 WHITE FEMALES No. Passed 1 0 1 3 1 0 1 3 Percent Passed 100 100 100 100 100 100 OTHER MALES No. Passed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Passed OTHER FEMALES No. Passed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Passed Total of all students in the Other\" race category. These scores were not reported by gender.LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ARKANSAS MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS 1990-91 SCHOOL: MITCHELL ELEMENTARY INDIVIDUAL SCHOOL SUMMARY GRADE 6 1988 READING 1989 1990 I 1991 1988 MATHEMATICS 1989 1990 1991 1988 LANGUAGE ARTS 1989 1990 1991 1988 SCIENCE 1989 1990 1991 1988 SOCIAL STUDIES 1989 1990 199 1 ALL STVDENTS No. Tested No. Passed 16 14 27 23 29 24 17 16 16 14 27 21 29 25 17 15 Pt Passed n r ACK MALES j:o. Passed perc_n b Passed BLACK FEMALE.S No. Passed Percent Passed WHITE MALES No. Passed e 88 4 100 9 82 1 cent Passed 100 85 8 73 13 93 2 100 83 12 71 12 100 0 94 5 83 11 100 0 88 4 100 9 82 1 100 78 7 64 13 93 1 50 86 14 82 11 92 0 88 5 83 10 91 0 16 12 75 3 75 8 73 1 100 27 18 67 6 55 11 79 1 50 29 16 55 9 53 7 58 0 17 14 4 52. 10 91 0 16 12 75 3 75 8 13 1 100 27 17 63 6 55. 9 64 2 100 29 15 52 12 3 25 0 17 12 Ji 4 5Z 8 25 0 16 9 .5.6 2 5Q. 6 55 1 105 27 16 -52. 5 55 10 71 1 55 29 14 58 10 59. 4 55 0 17 13 76 4 31-. 9 ii .52___[i 0 I WHITE FEMALES No. Passed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Passed OTHER MALES No. Passed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent passed OTHER FEMALES Uo. Passed I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Passed 1 1___L- i .. Total of all students in the \"Other\" race category. These scores were not reported by gender. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ARKANSAS MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS 1990-91 INDIVIDUAL SCHOOL SUMMARY GRADE 3 SCHOOL: MITCHELL ELEMENTARY READING 1900 1909 MATHEMATICS 1990 1991 1900 1909 1990 1991 ALL STUDENTS No. Tested Ho. Passed 20 17 36 31 23 20 28 26 20 19 36 29 23 21 28 28 Percent Passed 86 07 93 95 81 91 100 BLACK HALES No. Passed Percent Passed BLACK FEMALES Ho. Passed Percent Passed 60 10 100 14 15 18 16 12 92 io 83 12 100 14 12 80 10 100 88 12 71 100 12 92 100 12 100 ^5 3 6 ' 4 7 88 WHITE HALES No. Passed 1 1 3 4 1 1 2 3  Percent Passed 75 67 50 100 100 100 50 100 WHITE FEMALES No. Passed 3 3 1 - 1 0 1 0 1 Percent Passed Ill 100 100 100 100 100 OTHER HALES No. Passed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Passed OTHER FEMALES No. Passed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Passed * Total of all students in the \"Other\" race category. These scores were not reported by gender.LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ARKANSAS MINIMUM PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS 1990-91 IIOOL: MITCHELL ELEMENTARY INDIVIDUAL SCHOOL SUMMARY GRADE 6 READING MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE ARTS SCIEIICE SOCIAL STUDIES . MAA MM MAA M?I MSA MM. IMA MM. _1MA H89 AMA I8M. IMA 15t 1114 -mx- LL_aTi:UEUXS Iio. Tested No, Passed 16 14 27 23 29 24 17 16 eront !ACK EALES No. Passed ercwnt Pessed LACK EEHALES No. Passed arcent Passed HITE HALES l.o.' Passed .ercent PasssA 88 4 100 9 82 1 100 85 8 73 13 93 2 100 83 12 71 12 100 0 94 5 83 11 100 0 16 14 88 4 100 9 82 1 100 27 21 78 7 64 13 93 1 50 29 25 86 14 82 11 92 0 17 15 88 5 83 10 91 0 1 16 12 75 3 75 8 73 1 100 27 18 67 6 55 11 79 1 50 29 16 55 9 S3 7 , 58 0 17 14 4 SO. 10 91 0 16 12 75 3 Ji 8 13 1 IJO 27 17 63 6 9 64 2 IQQ 29 15 52 12 21 3 25 0 17 12 JI. 4 R7 8 JJ 0 16 9 27 16 -52. 29 14 _1A 17 13 2_. 2 5 10 4 ill. 6 55 1 1I111 Ai 59. i2. 10 JL 1 ill- 4 JI 0 9 - \u0026amp;2 0 I  I I J HITE FEMALES No. Passed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 /ercent Passed ITHER HALES No. Passed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 /ercent Pissed \u0026gt;THER FEMALES No. Passed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ecEsent TamM .u * Total of Mi students In the \"Other\" race category. Those scores were not reported by gender. '1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1991 MAT-6 Distribution J6481 M6BYSC 10/07/91 PAGE 510 SCHOOL: GRADE: MITCHELL INCENTIVE SCHOOL 1 WHITE FEMALE TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY Percentile Summary N X N X N X N X N N X N I\nI i h 76 r_.99 50 26 QI 75 49 25 ___75X_ 0 1 0 OX 25X ._QX .1. i 2 0 25X_____ 25X SOX OX 2____BOX 1 1 0 25X 25X OX 2 2 0 0 SOX 5 OX OX OX 0 3 0 1 ax 757. 25X 1 I 1 1 25X 25X 25X 25X 1 3 0 0 25X 7SX OX OX I r .! j- I Number Tested Mean NatiL.NCE. WHITE MALE Percentile Summary 76 50 26 99 75 49 QI -.25______ Number Tested Mean Nat*l NCE ALL WHITE Percentile Summary 50 26 75 49 QI r. 85_______ Number Tested JJean NatLk RCE 4 __T1.2 4 63.0 4 61. ._1. 4 67 = 2 4 51.7 4 48.7 4 66.7 I\". TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY N X N X N X N X N X N X N 0 i 1 OX 33X 33X 1 6 0 _____L____33X____________2____ 3 43.4 3 48.1 TOTAL READING N X 33X OX ^7. 0 i 0 2 OX 33X OX 67X 0 1 1 1 OX 33X 33X 33X 0 2 0 1 OX 67X OX 33X 1 1 0 1 33X 33X OX 33X 0 1 1 1 OX 33X 33X 33X 3 42.7 3 44.6 3 42.4 3 47.6 3 43.6 TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY N X N X N X N X N X N ______3 __ .43X___________8_____?/_____ 1 2 ! . 14X 29X -.1 4X_ 1 2 2 14X 29X e9X ____ 2 1 2 97. 14X 29X __ 2 3 1 1 29X 43X 1 4X 1 4X 0 5 0 2 OX 71X OX 29X 2 2 1 2 29X 29X 1 4X 237. 1 4 1 1 1 4X 57X 1 4X 14X 7 53.^3._ 7 56^6. 7 53.^2______ 7 . . 57.5 7 ...^7,7 7 48.2 7 56.8 -I1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 991 MAT-6 Distribution J6481 M6BYSC 10/07/91 PAGE 511 t SCHOOL: GRADE: MITCHELL INCENTIVE SCHOOL 1 BLACK FEMALE TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY j------------- Percentile Summary .. JIB 50 26 99. 75 49 N X N X N N X N X N X N QI Number Tested Mean. NatiL NCE BLACK MALE Percentile Sunaary 76 -,?9__ 50 26 75 49 01 Number Tested ___________________________Q____53:^___________5 2 3 .4 1 3X 20X 27X 2 3 ... 2 13X 20X 1 3X 5 0 33X 33X OX ___33X .7___47X____ 2 3 3 13X 20X 20X 2 5 1 7 13X 33X 7X 47X 3 1 5 6 2 OX 7X 33X 4 OX 7 1 3 4 47 X 7X 20X 27X 15 .51.^____ TOTAL READING N X 15 62.1________ 15 .._.-50.^7- TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE N X N 15 57.3 1 5 -..44,0 15 46.1 15 56.2 BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY N X N X N X N 2 i 1 ISX 54X 8X 0 B 3 .__..3-_.e3X OX ^3.7: 23X . .,2____15X _ ___1 2 1 8X 15X 54X 83X 1 6 5 8X 46X 38X )_____8X_ 2 3 2 6 15X 23X 15X 46X 1 8 1 3 8X 15X 54X 23X 1 5 5 2 8X IBY. IBK 15X 1 3 Mean Nat'l_ NCE_______51.6 _ 13 4?, 6 1 3 44.6 1 3 49.5 1 3 44.5 13 45.0 1 3 48.3 ALL BLACK TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY Percentile Sumsary N X N X N X N X N X N X N X .76 - 99 50 26 75 49 8._,9X.__ 9 4 32X 14X a___29X_____ _01 -.25______ 1 0 6 36X 21 X ___6 7 7 Nusber Tested 7 _.e5X-. ... 1___.1.4X__________a. 21 X. ... 25X 25X 23X____ 8 .. 29X 8 8 4 29X 29X 14X 4 8 3 1 3 14X 29X 1 IX 46X 4 3 12 9 14X 1 1X 43X 32X 8 6 8 6 29X 21 X e9X 21 X 28  Mean Nat2_l.NCE_______S4..6____ 28 56^X 28 __47.9______ 28 53.7 28 44.2 _ 28 45.6 28 52.5 fI I 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: GRADE: MITCHELLINCENTIVE SCHOOL-------------- 1 ALL STUDENTS TOTAL READING PercentlYSuary N X 1991 TOTAL MATHEMATICS N X MAT-6 Distribution TOTAL LANGUAGE N X *16481 M6BYSC 10/07/91 PAGE 512 BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY N X N 76 50 26 01 99 75 49 25 1 1 1 0 6 8 31X 29X' 17X 3'/. 1 0 1 1 8 6 29X 31X 23X 17X 8 *9 8 1 0 23X S6X 23X e9X 1 0 1 1 9 5 29X 31X 26X 14X 4 13 3 15 1 IX 37X 9X 43X N X N X Nunber Tested MNat * 1 NCE 35 55.6 35 56.4 35 48.9 35 54.4 35 44.9 6 5 13 1 1 17X 1 4X 37X 31X 9 1 0 9 7 26X 29X 26X 20X 35 46.1 35 53.4\ni h.i 'I I1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 991 MAT-6 Distribution #J6481 M6BYSC 10/07/91 PAGE 513 J .! I SCHOOL: GRADE: MITCHELL INCENTIVE SCHOOL 2 UHITE FEMALE TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY Percent lie Sunnary ____ 50 26 ____01 J 9. 75 49 25 Number Tested Mean.NatJJUCE ALL UHITE Percentile Summary N N X N X N X N N X N ]. ...  1 76 50 26 99 7B 49 01 -_25- Number Tested Mean Nat1 NCE BLACK FEMALE I ! -I Percentile Summary -lb 99 50 26 75 49 .......,Ql r as Number Tested Mean NatlL NCE 1 0 0 1 OX ox BOX 1 0 1 0 OX BOX ox 1 0 1 0 _ BOX OX BOX OX ____1......_50X 0 0 1 OX OX BOX 0 i 1 0 OX BOX BOX OX 1 0 0 1 SOX OX OX BOX 1 0 0 1 BOX OX OX BOX 2 5,9.3.. 2 71x9.._ 2 68,4 2 65.3 2 -49,7 2 56.9 2 64.5 TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY N X N X N X N X N N X N X 1 0 0 _____! 2 59,3 BOX OX OX BOX. TOTAL READING N X _____j___BOX 0 1 OX BOX 0 OX 2 71 .9 TOTAL MATHEMATICS N X 1 0 1 0 2 BOX OX BOX OX 1 0 0 BOX OX OX ____1_,_. BOX 2 65.3 TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY N X N X .4___36X__________4_36X___________4____36X 3 1 __3 27X 9X S7X a 5 0 1 8X 4BX _QX 4 1 ___e 36X 9X 1 8X 3......27X.._, 4 1 3 36X 9X 27X 1 1 .-56-^,_.. 11 ___57.. 5_. 11 ._.s4..a 11 57.5_____ 0 1 1 0 OX BOX BOX OX 1 0 0 1 BOX OX OX BOX 1 0 0 1 BOX OX OX BOX 2 49.7 2 56.9 2 64.5 SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY N X N X N X 1 . _9X 2 4 4 18X 36X 36X 0 2 4 5 OX 1 8X 36X 45X 3 4 1 3 27 X 36X 9X 27 X 1 1 41 .2 1 1 38.8 1 1 53.9 I I L1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 991 MAT-6 Distribution #J6481 M6BYSC 10/07/91 PAGE 514 I SCHOOL: GRADE: MITCHELL INCENTIVE SCHOOL 2 BLACK KALE TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY Percentile Summary . .76- -.9.9- 50 26 01 75 49 2.5. Number Tested N X N X N N X N N X N g___.13X__________g____1.3X_____ 5 4 5. 1 6 31X 25X 31X 4 8 25X SOX ____2 5 4 .13X 31X 25X ___1 ...... 7 3 44X 1 9X g 13X ____5__31 X 5_. 31X 0 1 6 9 OX 6X 38X 56X 0 5 1 1 0 OX 31 X 6X 1 4 e 5 6X 25X 38X 31 X ____Htan NatM. NCE_________________ 1 6 ____4.TL4 1 6 44.5 . 1 6 44,9.. 1 6 33. 1 1 6 34.9 1 6 41.9 ALL BLACK TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY Percentile Summary N X N X N N N , X N X N X 76 - ^3 _ so 26 75 49 6 . - gax. 8 5 30X 19X h___22X 01.-.2E____ 6 13 22X 48X ___6 9 5 ____30X __ ___g_____.7X _ 22X 33X 19X ___1___26X 4 1 1 4 8 15X 41 X 15X 3 OX 1 3 1 0 13 4X 1 1X 37X 46X 0 7 5 15 OX 26X 1 9X 5 6X 4 8 7 8 15X 30X 26X 30X I,\n.r-..  1 Number Tested Mean NatU.NCE 27 - 48-5 27 51 .5 27 48.5 27 50.0 27 36.4 27 36.5 27 46.8 I i\nI J I J1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 991 MAT-6 Distribution KJ6481 M6BYSC 10/07/91 PAGE 515 'i SCHOOL: GRADE: MITCHELL INCENTIVE SCHOOL 2 ALL STUDENTS TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY Percentile Sunmary N N N  N Z N Z N Z N 76 50 26 01 33 75 49 25 7 8 5 9 24Z 28Z 17Z 31Z 7 6 14 2 24Z 21Z 48Z 7% 7 a4Z 9 \"3YZ 6 7 21Z 24Z 5 1 i 4 9 17Z 38Z 14Z 31Z 1 4 1 1 1 3 3Z 14Z 38Z 45Z 1 7 5 1 6 3Z 24Z 17Z 55Z 5 8 7 3 1 7Z 28Z 24Z 31 Z Number Tested Mean Nat*l NCE 29 49.3 29 52.9 29 49.8 29 51 . 1 29 37.4 29 37.9 29 48.0 i -Ir 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: GRADE: MITCHELL INCENTIVE SCHOOL 3 UHITE FEMALE TOTAL READING 1 991 TOTAL MATHEMATICS HAT-6 Distribution TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE #16481 M6BYSC SOCIAL STUDIES I 0/07/91 PAGE 516 COMPLETE BATTERY Percentile Sumaary _76 50 26 75 49 N X N X N X N N X N A. N X ._Q1 0 2 1 .0. -.PX 67X 33X - OX ______3___lOJK 0 0 0 OX OX OX 2_ i 0 0 67X 33X OX OX 2 1 0 0 67X 33X OX OX 1 2 0 0 33X 67X OX OX 0 2 1 0 OX 6 7X 33X OX 1 2 0 0 33 X 67X OX OX Nuaber Tested Mean Natil. NCE, 3 52.8____ 3 ______67-.2- 3 ___67.._6_______ 3 62.6 3 62.9 3 51 . 1 3 61.2 WHITE KALE TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY Percentile Sunaery N X N X N N X N N Z N 76 ,r .,?? so 26 75 49 __0____OX 01 - 25___ 0 0 ____t. OX OX 0 0 1 OX OX 1 OOX 0 6 1 10OX__________0_____OX _ox OX 1 OOX __p.........______ 0 0 0 1 OX OX OX 1 OOX 0 0 0 1 OX OX OX 1 OOX 0 0 0 1 OX OX OX 1 OOX 0 0 0 1 OX OX OX 1 OOX I------- Number Tested Mean Nat*1 NCE 1 1 ALL UHITE Percentile Sunaary 50 26 01 75 49 ,25 Number Tested 20.4 46.3 1 1 41.3 30.7 1 1 33.7 29.9 1 29.9 TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY N X N N X N X N X N N X ___0______OX, 2 1 1 SOX 25X 25X :?___^75X._. 0 1 0 OX 25X OX 2 1 1 0 .... 50X 25X 25X OX 2 1 0 1 SOX 25X OX 25X 1 2 0 1 25X SOX OX 25X 0 2 1 1 OX SOX 25X 25X 1 2 0 1 25X SOX OX 25X 4 Mean Natll..NCE_______4A*_7,_ 4 62^0 4 ,._6U0,. 4 54,7______ 4 .-55.6 4 45.8 4 53.4 J1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 991 MAT-6 Distribution J6481 M6BYSC 10/07/91 PAGE 517 SCHOOL: \u0026lt;1 GRADE: MITCHELL INCENTIVE SCHOOL 3 BLACK FEMALE TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY . I l-\u0026lt;. i-i I .,3 '-I ,,.i Percent ile Sunnary . _78 50 26 01 .39_ 75 49 S5 Number Tested N % N X N N X N X N X N X 2 20X 2 3 3 1 0 ______ttsn N.tLl_NCE____47_.8- BLACK MALE Percentile Sunmery 76 50 26 99 75 49 91_r:_2S. Number Tested Mean Nat'1,NCE__ ALL BLACK Percentile Summary .__76. 50 26 75 49 ___01_ .- 2S. Number Tested - N.CE. 20X 30X 30X 4 3 3 _4QX 30X 30X . 6 _.60X____ 2 1 1 BOX 1 ox 1 ox 4 ....40X___ 2 B 20X 20X eox Z 3 3 2 BOX 30X 30X BOX 2 3 4 1 BOX 30X 4 OX 1 OX 4 2 2 2 40X 20X 20X 20X TOTAL READING N 0 2 3 J. OX 17X 25X 58X 12 31 .1 TOTAL READING N X 1 0 _____67. 1 0 ____63.2_____ TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE N 4 2 4 X N X 1 0 58,3...... BASIC BATTERY N X 1 0 ____53. 1 SCIENCE N 1 0 53.7 1 0 56.9 SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY N N 'k 2. 4 6 _9X______ 18X 27X 19_.__ 45X 22 .38_7_ 33X 17X 33X ________17X 4 4 . e ___ 12 51 .8 TOTAL MATHEMATICS N X 8___36X___ 5 7 23X 32X . 2_____9X ... 22 59^ 33X 33X 2___17X .. 1 2 48.0 TOTAL LANGUAGE N X .. .Q____36X 6 5 27X 23X ____3___14X____ 22 54. 9 0 4 4 4 IB 40.7 OX 33X 33X . 33X BASIC BATTERY N X - 4........18X 27X 27X 27X 22 48.7____ 1 4 3 4 8X 33X 25X 33X 0 2 3 7 OX 1 7X 25X 58X Q 4 2 6 OX 33X 1 7X BOX 1 B 41.8 12 35.8 1 2 39.3 SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY N 3 7 6 6 14X 3ex 27X 27X N 2 5 7 8 X N 22 4 6.9 22 44.0 9X 23X 32X 36X 4 6 4 8 1 8X 27X 1 8X 36X 22 47.3 i-: I ,f I I 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 991 MAT-6 Distribution #J6481 M6BYSC 10/07/91 PAGE 518 I L- SCHOOL: GRADE: MITCHELL INCENTIVE SCHOOL ' 3 OTHER FEMALE TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY i'l Percentile SuaiBery N X N X N X N X N X N X N X  H I 76 50 26 01 99 75 49 25 0 1 0 0 ox 1 oox ox ox 0 1 0 0 ox 1 oox ox ox 0 1 0 0 OX 1 OOX OX OX 0 r 0 0 OX '1 OOX OX ox 0 0 1 0 OX OX 1 OOX OX 0 0 0 1 ox ox ox 1 oox 0 0 1 0 OX OX 1 OOX OX I i i-*f r\nNunber Tested Mean Nat'1 NCE 1 1 1 1 1 ALL OTHER Percentile Suaeary 51 . 1 51 . 1 61 .7 54.2 41 . 3 1 1 29.9 48.9 TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY N X N X N X N X N X N X N r p 76 50 26 01 99 75 49 25 0 OX 1 10 ox 0 0 OX OX I  I 0 ox 1 1 oox 0 0 OX OX OX 1 1oox 0 0 OX OX 0 1 0 0 OX 1 OOX OX OX 0 0 1 0 ox ox 1 oox ox 0 0 0 1 ox ox ox 1 oox 0 0 1 0 ox ox 1 oox ox Number Tested Mean Nat'1 NCE 1 1 1 1 1 51.1 51 . 1 61 .7 54.2 41.3 1 1 29.9 48.9 .1 I 53I I 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 991 MAT-6 Di st ri button J6481 M6BYSC I 0/07/91 PAGE 519 H SCHOOL: GRADE: MITCHELL INCENTIVE SCHOOL 3 ALL STUDENTS TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY I' I, I'\" I. PF' r' n\nt\u0026gt;v bl Percent lie Summary N N Z. N N Z. N N N i I _____ 50 26 75 49 01 25_. _2. 7 7 1 1 _7%. 26% 26% 41% n. 6 8  AtX_________10____37% 22% 30% 7% 8 6 3 30% 22% 11% ___6 8 6 7 22% 30% 22% 26Z. 4 9 7 7 15% 33% 26% 26%  1 8 1 0 7% 26% 30% 37% 5 8 5 9 19% 30% 19% 33% Number Tested Mean NatJ_l_NCE. 27 AO.* 0. 27 _59^,2,___ 27 _56.1 27 49.8 27 48.0 27 43.7 27 48.3 ! I 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 991 MAT-6 Distribution HJ64S1 M6BYSC 10/07/91 PAGE 520 '1 Sb k- 4e. 37 SCHOOL: GRADE: MITCHELL INCENTIVE SCHOOL 4 BLACK FEMALE Percent 11 Sunaary 50 26 75 49 01 _^.25 Nusber Tested TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY N N X N X N X N X N X N ! - I I I _a_ 3 3 ^.2X 33 X 33X 1 IX Z 1 0 22X 1 IX OX _5___56X____ 2 S. Q 22X 22X 4___44X 2 3 OX_________0 22X 33X OX 2 4 2 1 22 X 44X 22 X 1 1X 2 4 2 1 22X 44X 22X 1 1X 3 4 2 0 33X 44X 22X OX 9 Mean NatJ.l^NCE________55.6 . BLACK MALE TOTAL READING Percentile Suaaary 50 26 75 49 as___ Number Tested _____Mean Nat * 1 NCE ALL BLACK Percent 11 Sunaary _ 76 _-.-a9___ 50 26 75 49 ____91_-^ 25. Nuaber Tested Mean Nat * 1 N1 N X 9 .6 6.1_._ 9 __69_.5 9 62.8..__, 9 53. 1___ 9 57.6 3 61.0 TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY N X N X N X N X N N 1 5 0 14X 71X OX 4 2 1 _J____L4X ..57X 29X 14X 4 Z 0 ____0_____OX____ 57X 29X OX ____1__ ,14X 4 Z 0 1 57X 29X OX - 14X____ 2 4 0 ..... 1 29X 57X OX 14X 3 3 1 0 43X 43X 14X OX 4 0 1 57 X 29X OX 1 4X 7 57^3 7 68.5 7 67.2 7 64.0 7 58.9 7 65.6 7 64.0 TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY N X N X N X N X N N X N ._-3 ^A9Z_________10____63Z__________9____56Z . 8 3 SOX 19X 4 2 25X 13X ____2___13X_________^0, 16 .56.2 1 6 67.2 4 2 25X 13X 8 _ 50Z____ __________I_____6Z 1 6 .68.5___ 4 3 .... 25X 1 9X _ 4 8 2 2___I3Z 25X_____ SOX 13X 5 7 3 1 31 X 44X 1 9X 6X 7 6 2 1 44X 38X 1 3X 6X 1 6 63.3 . 1 6 ._ 55.6______ 1 6 61 . 1 1 6 62.3 'I i i:.i .y 10 'J 't I -I .:6 -I 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: GRADE: MITCHELL INCENTIVE SCHOOL 4 ALL STUDENTS TOTAL READING 1 991 TOTAL MATHEMATICS MAT-6 Distribution TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE ttJ6481 M6BYSC SOCIAL STUDIES 10/07/91 PAGE 521 COMPLETE BATTERY Percentile Sunnary 76 'so 26 01 99 75 49 25 Nuttber Tested Mean Nat'1 NCE N Z N N N Z N N Z N 3 8 3 2 19Z 'soz 19Z 13Z 1 0 4 2 0 63X 25Z 13Z OZ 9 4 2 1 56Z 25 Z 13Z 6Z 8 soz 4' 2SX 3 1 19Z 6Z 4 8 2 2 25Z SOZ 1 3Z 13Z 5 7 3 1 31Z 44Z 1 3% 1 h 2 1 44Z 38Z 1 3X 6Z 1 6 56.3 1 6 67.2 1 C 68.5 1 6 63.3 1 6 55.6 1 6 61 . 1 1 6 62.3 i| i   I ,1 BB.1 I h -r I J-  1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: GRADE: MITCHELL INCENTIVE SCHOOL 5 UHITE FEMALE TOTAL READING 1 991 TOTAL MATHEMATICS MAT-6 Distribution TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE *J6481 M6BYSC SOCIAL STUDIES 10/07/91 PAGE see COMPLETE BATTERY Percontllo Suaaary 50 26 75 49 0 I 2 5___ Number Tested Mean Nat *..l .NCE UHITE MALE Percentile Sumaary 76 - 99___ 50 26 75 49 _01 .25.___ Nuabe Test ed Mean Nat*1 NCE ALL UHITE Percentile Suaaary -._.76-r_99 50 26 75 49 01 - 25 Number Tested Mean. NatJ.JL. NCE. N N X N X N X N X N X N X 0 0 1 0 1 _ _ox bx 1 oox - _ox ___ TOTAL READING N X 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 ___62.3 OX___ 1 box ox _______0______QX 1 55.3 TOTAL READING N X .0. 1 1 _GX SOX SOX ...,Q_____0X_ 2 .51^4____ ox 1 0 ox ox ox ___ TOTAL MATHEMATICS N X 0 1 0 ox _ 1 box ox 9_____OX 1 52.6 TOTAL MATHEMATICS N 0 2 0 0 2 ._..57..5. X _QX 1 oox ox __ox 0_ 1 0 0 1 OX 1 OOX OX OX 0 i 0 0 1 .. 57.5 TOTAL LANGUAGE N X _0 0 1 . 0 1 36.5 OX i 66x ox OX 0 0 1 0 1 48.9 BASIC BATTERY N ox ox 1 oox _ ox____ TOTAL LANGUAGE N X _0_____QX^_. 1 1 0 2 SOX 50X OX 0 1 0 0 1 50.0 ox 1 oox ox ox BASIC BATTERY N X _.Q____ OX 2 0 1 OOX OX 0____ OX 2 53,8 OX ox 1 OOX ox SCIENCE N X 0 0 0 1 1 29.9 OX OX ox 1 oox SCIENCE N X 0 0 1 1 OX OX SOX SOX 2 39.4 0 1 0 0 1 64.2 OX 1 OOX ox ox 0 1 0 0 1 57.5 SOCIAL STUDIES N X 0 0 1 0 1 44.1 OX 1 OOX OX OX COMPLETE BATTERY N X ox OX 1 oox ox 0 0 1 0 1 45.8 SOCIAL STUDIES N X 0/. OX 1 OOX ox COMPLETE BATTERY N 0 1 1 0 OX SOX 5 OX OX 0 1 1 0 OX SOX SOX OX 2 54.2 2 51.7 zt1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1991 MAT-6 Distribution #J6481 M6BYSC 10/07/91 PAGE 523 SCHOOL: GRADE: MITCHELL INCENTIVE SCHOOL 5 BLACK FEMALE TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY Percentile Summary N X N X N X N X N N X N 76 -.99___ 50 26 01 75 49 25 ___0._ 1 6 4 OX 9X 55X 36X __1 1 7 2 ___9X.. 9X 64X 1dX ____1__......9X_________Q 3 5 2 27X 45X 18X 2 5 ox_ iex 45X 4___36X, 0 0 4 7 OX OX 36X 64X 0 3 7 1 OX 27X 64X 9X 0 2 5 4 OX 18X 4SX 36X Number Tested _ .Mean Nat.Cl. NCE._ 11 ____37.. 5____ 11 46..0.. 1 1 ..45.8____ 1 1 42.1 1 1 ________31 .8 1 1 46.2 1 1 40.9 BLACK MALE TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY Percentile Summary N X N X N X N X N X N N X 76 50 26 99 _ 75 49 1___ 6X_. -Ot - 85. . 5 2 31X 13X __8.....5PX 2 8 3 3 13X BOX 1 9X t9X.._ 1 8 6 1__ 6X BOX 3dX 6X 1 7 6 2 6X 44X 38X 13X_ 1 4 5 6 6X 25X 31X 38X 3 6 5 2 19X 38X 31X 1 3X 1 5 7 3 6X 31 X 44X 1 9X Number Tested Mean Nat'1 NCE 1 6 42.1 16 ._5k3 1 6 __A3.1 1 6 47.3 1 6 43.4 I 6 53.3 1 6 47.6 ALL BLACK TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY Percentile Summary N N X N N X N N X N . 76. -_.99_. 50 26 75 49 ____1_____JX____ QI - 25____ 6 8 22X 30X ..._3.___11X,._ 9 10 18.. .44X 33X 37X . . 1 1 1 1 5..._19X 7X 41X 41X 1 9 1 1 6 . 4X_..... 33X 41 X 22X 1____4X_ 4 9 13 15X 33X 48X 3 9 1 2 3 1 1X 33X 44X 1 1X 1 1 1 2 7 4X 26X 44X 26X Number Tested ____Mean.. Nat LI NCE 27 40.2___ 27 _____49^.1_______ 27 _____48.,1 .. 27 45.2 27 .... 3Q.1 27 50.4 27 44.91 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 991 MAT-6 Distribution J6481 M6BYSC 10/07/91 PACE 524 I SCHOOL: GRADE: MITCHELL INCENTIVE SCHOOL 5 ALL STUDENTS TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY Percentile Summary N X N X N X N X N X N N X .1 i 76 50 26 01 99 75 49 25 1 7 9 1 2 S4X 31X 41X 3 '1 i 1 0 5 J OX 16% 34X 1 7X _2 1 S 12 3 7X 41 X 41 X lOX 1 1 1 1 1 6 3X 38X 38X SIX 1 4 1 0 1 4 3X 1 4X 34X 46% 3 1 0 13 3 1 OX 34X 45X 1 OX 1 8 13 7 3X 28 X 45X 24X I f  I Number Tested Mean Nat*l NCE S3 41.0 S3 49.7 29 48 . S 29 45.8 36.7 29 50.7 3 45.3 1 .1 ..I-  I iI 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 991 MAT-6 Distribution J6481 M6BYSC 10/07/91 PAGE 525 -I T J .1 'i SCHOOL: GRADE: MITCHELL INCENTIVE SCHOOL 6 BLACK FEMALE TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY Percentile Sunaary N X N N N X N X N N X ' I r 50 26 01 75 49 25 ____ ... 1 ._..1 IX. 4 1 3 44X 1 1 X 33X 5 i 3 0 .56X 1 IX 33X OX 3 2 4 0 33X 22X 44X OX 3 2 4 0 33X 22X 44X OX 3 1 1 4 33X 1 1 X 1 1 X 44X 4 1 2 2 4-.. 1 1X 22X ZZ'X 3 2 3 1 33 X 22X 33X 1 1 X Number Tested 9 Mean Nat2.1._NCE_______49.9 BLACK MALE TOTAL READING Percentile Sumaary 76 50 26 93 75 49 ___01 - 25 Nuaber Tested Mean Nat * 1 NCE ALL BLACK Percentile Suaaary ... 76 50 26 _01 - .99____ - 75 - 49 - 25_ Number Tested _ Mean Natll.NCE n N X 9 . . 66,- 5____ TOTAL MATHEMATICS N X 3 TOTAL LANGUAGE N 9 ___58.4____ BASIC BATTERY N X 9 47.4 9 57.3 9 57.3 SCIENCE SOCIAL  STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY N N X N X _ 0 1 1 _4 6 40.6 OX 17X 17X 67X-- TOTAL READING N X 1 5 2 33X 13X 1___47X_ 15 .46 . I. 3 0 2 1 SOX ox 33X 17X 1 a 2 1 7X 33X 33X t____17X .. 2 1 0 3 33X 17X OZ _50X 2 2 0 2 33X 33X OX 33X 2 1  1 33X 17X 33X 17X 2 1 1 2 33X 17X 1 7X 33X 6 59.1 \u0026amp; 47.3 6 47.9 6 50.4 6 52.7 6 49.0 TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY N X N X N X N X N N X ____.0___53X____ 1 5 1 7X 33X _ 7X _4_...27X 4 6 1 e7X AfiX 5___33X 3 4 3 2 OX 27X 20X 5 3 1 6 33X BOX 7X 40X 6 2 4 3 4 OX 1 3X 27X 2 OX 5 3 4 3 33X 20X 27 X 20 X 15 ____63.5._. 1 5 ______55.2.,, 15 54.2____ 15 48.6 15 55.5 1 5 54.0 HB n1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1991 MAT-6 Distribution J6481 M6BYSC 10/07/91 PAGE 526 ! , I- 1 SCHOOL: GRADE: MITCHELL INCENTIVE SCHOOL 6 OTHER FEMALE TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY Percentile Summary . 76 ^.95. 50 26 75 49 Qt ,.Z25 Number Tested Mean NatM. NCE__ ALL OTHER N % N X N y. N X N N X N Q_____OX___ 1 0 0 1 ___62.9 Percentile Sumnery J k I 76 50 26 99 75 49 01 -..25_ Numbe Tested Mean Nat1 NCE__ J-------------- .\nr~ '! 1 OOX OX _0_____OX 1 0 0 1 ._52,t TOTAL READING N X 1 0 OX . 1 OOX OX 1 OOX OX OX _ 0____OX 1 0 1 oox ox Q_.. _ O''- 0 1 0 0 OX 1 OOX OX OX 0 1 0 0 ox 1 OOX OX OX 0 1 0 0 OX 1 OOX OX OX 0 1 0 0 OX 1 OOX OX OX 1 1 1 1 1 .....59.9..... TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE N X N X 58.1 54.8 63.5 59.3 BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY N X N X N N X 0 1 0 ._.0X____ idox ox __0____ OX.......... 0_____OX _ 1 0 .__..o. 0____ox 1 OOX OX OX 0 1 0 0 OX 1 OOX ox ox 0 1 0 0 OX 1 OOX OX OX 0 1 0 0 ox 1 OOX ox OX 0 1 0 0 ox 1 OOX OX OX 1 1 1 1 .62:9 __52.1 59.9 58.1 1 1 1 54.8 63.5 59.3  j 01 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 991 MAT-6 Distribution J6481 M6BYSC 10/07/91 PAGE 527 SCHOOL: GRADE: MITCHELL INCENTIVE SCHOOL 6 ALL STUDENTS TOTAL READING TOTAL MATHEMATICS TOTAL LANGUAGE BASIC BATTERY SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES COMPLETE BATTERY Percentile Summary N....  X N X N N X N X N X N 76 50 26 01 99 75 49 25 1 6 2 7 6X 38X 13X 44X 8 2 5 1 5 OX 1'3X 31X 6X 4 \"5 6 1  31 X 38X 6X 5 31 X 4 2SX' ___5 4 4 3 25X 1 9X 1 6 31 X 25X 6X 3ex 6 3 4 3 1 9X esx 1 9X 5 4 4 3 31 X 25X 25X 1 9X Nuaber Tested Mean Nat * 1 NCE 1 6 47.2 16 62.8 1 6 55.5 1 6 54.5 1 6 49.0 1 6 56.0 1 6 54.3 I It# MIT CHELU. ELEIVIE3SrTA.R Y IlHEEOVEMEISIT EL-A-ISI T992-93 DISTRICT MISSION The mission of the Little Rock School District is to provide an educational program that enables each child to achieve his/her highest potential. will provide\n2) To that end, the Little Rock School District (1) a program of basic education for all students\nthat address the special needs of students (2\nprograms ------- ------- . . (emotional, physical, and mental)\nand (3) enrichment opportunities such as art, music, and athletics. program of studies, each student will and will learn and appreciate responsibility and .inities Through an crganizea experience academic succes productive citizenship. PHILOSOPHY OF THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT sound and comprehensive philosophy, based on the personal and jcaticnal needs of students, is essential to a viable and effective public school program. The Little Rock School District statement of philosophy is hereby presented to promote a better understanding of and appreciation for the principles on which the present and future programs of the district are being developed. The school district instructional and supportive programs should: 2. Se designed, organizedanC implemented to provide all students with success-oriented, comprehensive, and sequential educational opportunities. Emphasize and continually reinforce the values of our democratic society, worthy citizenship and ethical behavior. 3. Provide each student with the opportunity for maximum intellectual and inter-personal development. 4. Reinforce positive goal-oriented learning by and rewarding student systematically recognizing success at all levels of achievement. 5. 6. Place emphasis on an intra-competitive system of education wherein each student competes with his own potential to enhance internal motivation and positive self-image. Present a diversified curriculum, under the board career education concept, to provide students with a maximum range of options in choosing careers. A 1.DISTRICT GOALS 1 . To Increase educational achievenient for emphasis on closing disparities in achievement. 11 students with specific 2 . To establish climates of educational excellence in all schools through: a) providing equitable educational opportunites for all students in a desegregated learning environment b) c) d) enabling all students to develop a lifelong capacity and love for learning leading a student to be productive contributors in the school, the community and the workplace providing a disciplined, structured learning environment all students 3. for To enchance human relations skills for principals, central office adminstrators. teachers , and BUILDING GOALS: 1. The number of students demonstrating mastery of basic skills competencies will increase during the 1992-93 school year as measured by the AMPT and Stanford Achievement Test in each of and these curricular areas: math, and science. reading, language arts, social studies, o A safe and orderly climate will be established to ensure the safety and well-being of the students as well as the quality of their education. 3, 4. To secure Mitchell for the safety of students, staff*\nand parents. Parental involvement will increase during the 1992-93 school year.mission rrATEMENT MITCHELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL We, at Mitchell Elenientary School, recognize the uniqueness of each student. We believe we must 'enable all students to develop all that makes them unique to the maxirnum of their abilities. we believe that Mitchell Elementary School should create an environment which encourages cur children to develop as thinking. caring individuals. We provide learning experiences that stimulate our students to coninunicate their intellectual, emotional, social and creative strengths in speaking writing, cind listening. We believe a. positive self-concept is of great importance'in the development of each student\ntherefore, we encourage each student to have worthwhile goals, self-discipline, concern for his fellowman and a dedication to our democratic.way of life. /GLthouoh we realize that our goals and objectives must be flexi ble so that our students will be prepared for a constantly changing society, we also realize that malting our philosophy compatible with that of the Little Rock School District is essential in order to assure continuity between Mitchell and other schools in the District  ** expecially when our students leave our school and transfer to other elementary schools in the District or go onward toward the secondary level of learning experiences. -It is our intention to do all in our power to assist our students in learning how to best serve themselves as well as their community. oMITCUELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OBJECTIVES The objectives of Mitchell Elementary have been formulated to give each child the opportunity to learn, grow, and function in his present and future environments. Develop positive self-concepts. Develop the student's capacity to discipline himself to work, study, and play constructively. 3. Develop the social skills necessary for adjusting and adapting to our ever changing world. A. Encourage mutual respect and concern for others. 5. Provide situatic.ns in which problem-solving skills are encouraged. 6. Increase efficiency in all areas of instruction. 7, Enhance an appreciation for the multi-cultural heritage in our world. 8. Provide opportunities for creative expression in speaking. writing, and listening. 1. 9. Encourage each child to recognize his responsi-  bilities as a citizen of the community and country. 10. Provide opportunities for exposure to enriching experiences in and 'around the community.ASSESSMENT/ANALYSIS of LOCAL SCHOOL ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND NEEDS IN RELATION TO ESTABLISHED DISTRICT GOAL An assessment of the 1991-92 school year at Mitchell Elementary can on ly be considered through an understanding of the changes that Our school occurred in our population from the previous two years. population increased fifty-one (51) per cent in 1991-92 over the population of the two preceding years. What that meant for us is that, effect, we were working with an entirely different group of students, that information even further we had more new students to in To illustrate Mitchell at some grade levels than 'we had returning. Additionally, students leaving Mitchell was not a What these numbers even more significant is that sixty three (63) per Mitchell last year entered reading below rade we factor -in these numbers. makes cent of those students enterin grade level. o While a lot cognizant of the need academic achievement. or progres occurred, we are extremely we We must address to move Mitchell toward high incorporated the effective schools have and , on the mastery in particular, will forcu correlates into our plan, of basic skills, a safe and orderly climate as well a involvement as we work with our students. parental Students in grade (85) per cent mastery three achieved eighty-fiv six pass rates did not meet the minimum state standards on any'^ea oV the teSt.-----STS' UXpH'CL.rhis performance to improve tlTT^yearu----duf atCAdhed plan conc'entrates largely on strategies for the mastery of basic skills in the following curricular areas: reading, math, language arts, social studies and science. While, we believe the large number of new students last year functioning below grade level hampered our performance, we are equally confident our combined efforts with a constant population and .our newly revised on the AMPT. tlrtKyear. in grade TTS' uxpyeL this year coupled curriculum will yield significant improvement. Each grade level at Mitchell scored considerably below the national ayera^ on the Stanford AchievemerTL ThiJ' maj diJuppiJTiitii'ij, Lu uur s'cRooi, particularly in light of* our steady gains during the three preceding years. Again we were working with a remarkably different Additonally, the change in test and format of the test administered added to our decline. students, and population. 1 d t\nL. Our school staff, parents feel confident our concerted efforts will move our students forward during the current year. sense of ownership and pride is critically important to a learning environment. This, of course, the influx of students from many different areas, must develop over time. school's With the achievement of this,.goal was difficult, but it was realized. Visitors to Mitchell often commented on the positive feeling tone observed and felt throughout the building. Monitoring visits'often reported climate as a strength. While we had nine (9) out of school suspensions, increase was only proportional to the increase in membership, many new students came with a history of behavior problems. the Additional 1y It is cleardid impact behavior positively, watch as the various factions unified group. This factor will greatly assist in understanding of cognitive to emphasize strategies for building a to see w rewarding to We continue Additionally, it was of students melded into  information as we begin and orderly climate in thi plan. a the delivery and the 92-93 positive, year. saf e, are strategies identified needs and accompanying the overall success of our students. to ensure that each student masters the basic skills in an All of our instrumental in It is our goal tudent environment that supports each student's strengths. We expect our school improvement plan together with the newly revised curriculum will ensure our success. fTARGET: OUTCOME\nIMPRO VEMENT ri^N To iirrensR etiiraticrHl addec'Einnt for all students yith special cglYisis at rcaling.________________________________ He nuiiisr of sbilnts at Mitchell Sdwl doimstrating mastery of basic skills axi ccmpetencies will increaso ciiring Ue 1992-93 school year as nEasured by the AMT and Stanford Achiewerngnt Test. actions RESPONSIBILITY TIMELINE RESOURCES STAFF DEVELOPMEITT EVALUATION DATA Students \\flll be assessed to detetnrirE strengths and weaknesses as \\11 as their instnicticnal lecels in reading utilizing the Principal dassroon Teachers Reading Specialist August 31- Septaiter 15 Rearliqg Specialist ass FtoFiles foUadrig resources: -Stanford lest Results -Reading PLacaient lasts -IjeadET made diagnostic tests of skills tested cn Arkansas Mininun Fferfcrmance Tests -i-Jriting sanples -leadTer observaticn Stud3Tt Bducaticnal plans will be cfe\\lopQd by eadi edassreon teader in cooperatiai with paroits, .qperifllists, as W^ as tte building principal and irdividual student. Qassrocm Teachers Specialists Principal Ihcents Students Ajgust 31- Septenter 25 Developing EEfecti\\e SEP'S Developed SEP's Student Itogpess TaadTers will de\\^il3p teadiing strategies to targpt deficit areas. Principal Staff AjgLBt 31- Cpgaing Iteading Dept. Curriculun Guides Curriculun Training Abacus Training AMT Staiford 8 Teacher Gbsen.aticn 1 I i1 TARGET: OUTCOME: ACTIONS IMPROVEhlENT riAN To increase edratinrol adTievaimt for all students yd th special enphasis on i oading.________________________________ The nnter of students at MitdEll Sdrol daimstrating mastery of Insic skills \u0026lt;and coipetcncies will irarease during ths 1992-9.3 school year as neasired ly tlie AMPT and Stanford Adiievoimt Test. RESPONSIBILITY TIMELINE RESOURCES STAFF DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION DATA leadTerB viill review test results fcr students failiii\nPrinciFol Staff Sqjtenfcer 18 AMPT results Axidanic Soils Plans areas cn the Arkansas MLniiam DerfccmaToe Test and develop academic skills plans as needed. Teachers will road aloud to their stufeits cn a regular basis to madel reading for their students cni help them develop an appreciation for literature. l^oi ingA-ti t ing experienoe win be interrelated. All classroom teachers will inplanent the LEAR program in the classrocm schedule. Oassrocm Teadiers ^Ecdalists Classrocm Teachers Ffedia Specialist Reading Specialist Roncipal leadTets Argust 1992- (Igpdig Argust - Chgpiig Septaer 1- Cb^ipg Literature bocks Ifedia Specialist COrridiluii Training tteading Specialist (IPC) Library Student Process Principnl Gbservation Lessen Plan Ecdes Student Progress AMPE Scores Stanford Test Student ProgressTARGET: OUTCOME: ACTIONS IMPRO VEA/ENT PJAN To irare^vie edrmticml adiievarent for all, students yith special onpirifns aTreahi^G------------------------------------------------- Te ruiter of studcaits at Mitchell SdraL demonstrating mastery of bcsic skills ard conpetencies will increase during the 1992-93 sclrol ypsr as measured ty the A^PL and Stanford Afhiexonent lest. RESPONSIBILITY TIMELINE RESOURCES STAFE DEVELOPWEITT EVALUATION DATA Students in grades ore and two diall have reading twice a d^. (L. Art block ard agpin in content area.) All students shall read a tirinumn of 4 literacy selections fron tlie Ore Literature List.. Elect-lb-Read readathen as well as otlier reading prorotions will be held throu^xut Che year. The ptincipal will make instruction the majr focus and will observe teachers a nuninun of ei^ times allowing for more collaborative supervisicn. Students will week in confute c lah three times a week cn progcaiB desagped to assist stutots in the remediation of ddlls as well as increasing Inkier level thinkiiTg skills. ____________ Grade 1-2 leachers Principal Teachers Reading 5^TPria1ist ifedia fecial i st Staff Principal Mncipal CoTfuter S^ialist dassrocm leachers Septenisr- Q^pdng Septentea?- Chgaing October,1- Chgaing AigiBt 31- Chgping Aygust 31- digping Literature Lists/CUrriculur Ftrlia Center ELsct-Tc-Read Pronotiai materials Ourriculun IrairriiTg . Increased adiifi^'enrait Increased afdjsvnTBit Increased achievaient Greater partidpatlcn in reading for enje^nent Record of teadTer obeervatiais Eicreased adiiewmsnt lixxeaaed aehievement ..J r1 TARGET: OUTCOME: ACTIONS IMPROVEMENT PLAN To increaga edraticnal adiig.engnt\nfor all studenLs ynlh special nuim-is cn realiry. The rrmber of studaits at Mitdiell School doncnstratiqg mastery of basic .ski 11: 1992-93 school year as measured ly the AMPT and Stanford Adiievarent Test. atl canpetencies will inersase Airing tl^ RESPONSIBILITY TIMELINE RESOURCES STAFF DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION DATA PAL teader will wok with classrmn teachers to cocr- dinate effertd to ensure the optimal delivery of services to stvdents. Cross agp/peer tutcring tall operate thrai^rut the instructienal pcogran. Thstrueticnal aides will targpt stuAnts who are in greatest need in reading. Teaders will Identify the leaniirg styles of Uieir stuAnts and utilize this infocmaticn fee instructim. PAL Teadiers Principal CLassroon Teadiers Rdncipal Staff Reading Specialist Cbmsalor CLassroon Teachers Insttuctional aides Classnxm leaciTers Ajgust 31- Septaiier 15- Chepiog Septente 15 Septaiier 12- Qi^ing iffiists Reading Socialists Learnirig Stylet Inventcry Student Pepgpess Test Scores StuAnt Etx@:ess (. Tutoring Tips for Instructior^ aides Student Progress histructional aide Reoccds Intentccies cn file IrRentcries cn file1 TARCETI': OUTCOME: IMPRO VEMENT PLAN To incren:^ educational adiievnnent for all students ^-dth spxdal aiphasis ------------------------------------------------ Tie miter of stucfents at Mitchell School denmstratirig mastery of basic dcills and canpetencies will increase clilng the 1992-93 sdcol year as maasured by the MT and Stanford AiucM^irnt Test., ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY TIMELINE RESOURCES STAFF DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION DATA Schxl-wide Ebstal Service \\dll be inpLanented to lnp33\\e larigLHgp arts skills as well as to unify the student body tluxr^ a sdtolwide ocnnirricaticri system. Studants will be. gi\\^ frequent oppcctmites fcr interacting with each other regprdirg literature selections. Selected students will provide infamatlm throj^ die school interccm about books/sslectims d-Ey would reconiEnd. Reading Specialist Ffedia SpecdsUst C. Quin J. Calhotn K. Cafe  Principal Oassroaii leachers Special j.Sts lYincipal K. cede Teachers Studaits October 15 ChgpuTg /ijgust 31- ChgDing Septeiter 14- Qlgaiiig U.S. Ibst Offic! Eeudepirig a sdiool-irzide Ebstal Service Media Center Increased ad-iifiVHisnt Increased achreraenC Increased interest in readiiTg Student Progcess t1 TARGET: lb incrensg Hie ruiter OUTCOME: .aetoal ACTIONS StuintS wUl be assessed to determine strengths and weaknesses in math utilizing the AMT, Stanford Tiest resiits together with teader cteervaticn end other assesenent criteria. bbrofulati'ves will be usad extensively to teadi nathanatics across all grade levels. JMrROVEMENT ELAN edLcatiaH-l adiievEment: foe all stiAnts wlQi spacial oitj-asis in imth. will ijwaase diring tie W-93 of , at ^33jmdTyJl^-AtET-2Dd.2taifci^^ RESPONSIBILITY Oassrocm Teachers Ihth Specialists Principal Teachers ifath Specialist TIMELINE resources STAFF DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION DATA AjgiBt 31- Septaiber 15 AugLBt 31- Chgaing  Class Profiles Using Ihth ^fenipulatives effectively (Phth tfept./IK) Principal Cboarvatixn Increased adiievenent Cooperative learning teedniques will be utilized Principal Staff August 31- Cklgping 'linical Supervisicn /WI scares Stanford sccces by staff in woridrg with sttrients. All staff menbers will receive item specificatlcn cepdfis of aU objectives tested cn AMPE so that teadEcs can ensure skills are targeted. Teaers will utili2E a variety of technixiues to encouragp hi^ier level tiTirldng Keills with all students. Principal Principal Oassroon Teadiers G/r Teacher Ffatli St^ecialist Septenfcer 1 August 31- Chgcdxig ^fath Dept. (IKC) Tridi KtUingpw^rth (ffath Specialist Carver) Student Progeess lest llesults Principal obeervaticn Student achievaiEnt1 TARGET: OUTCOME: IMPRO VEh'IENT To intreasd edicatiord adri.evfnent fcr aU students crith special grTiiasis in matli. He rurber of students at 4g(ixx3L^on^as.uiEaam3ilyJ13S-A::EI-a^^ ^ti t-fjyl 1 (inwsttating master of tasic ddlJs and corpetencies will ircreass during the 1992-93 ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY TIMELINE RESOURCES STAFF DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION DATA Specifie'.AMT objectives will be T-plrgged in the ccmpiier lab to determine skill mastery periodically. Oppqrtmities will be available during extended day fee increased atteition to dpfirlt areas in math. Stiiknts will select and use appropriate approaches and tools for solving ptoblare, inrliiding mental coiputaticn trial and erra, paper and pencil, calculator and cenputer. Ihl Teader will wade with dassrocm teachers to coordirate effects to ensure tie optimal delivery of services to students. Conputer Specialist asErocm teachers dassrocm leachers .Math Specialist Teachers Ibl Teacher Edncdpal October 15- Chgaihg Octeber 1- Chgoing Septser.l5- ttigring AjgiBt 31- Chgaing Irtreased test scores Increased achievement Ffeth Specdaldst (HC) Increased student ahrifivement Student Progress Test sccres) 1 OUTCOME\nACTIONS IMPRO VEMENT PLAN To increase educational achievenEnt for all stvrlents yith special oipfijsis qn social stuiias._________________________ ^nuto of studaits at Mitdiell Sdiool demonstrating mastery of basic skills and oorfctencies will increase Airirg the 1992-93 sdeeJ. year as evidenced by the AMT and Stanford Test._________________ RESPONSIOILITY TIMELINE RESOURCES STAEE DEVELOPMEITT EVALUATION DATA Biphasis cn activities that will nave stulents to (kma'strate attitudes and lahits (pride in gsod worknandiip, dependahility), and other skills that will assist the students in beccmirig productive participents in aacdety will occur. Principal Staff Ctigoirig liipnved self-esteem Stufait Progress c Zetivities to assist student\nin vrrierstandiog the roles plagpd by varicus racial and etlTiic grocp's in developdng a pluralistic society. s Staff Ctigping Stxrient Pcogpess Discussirg to lead students to apply critical thinking skiljs and knowledgp firm history to the deci si m making process. Principal Staff Gocnailcr Chgping Increased self-esteem Student progress 3CK will be utili2Bd in the delivery cf am'al stiriles ccntent. Taachers Septarber 15- Cheoirig Incxeased test scares I 1 T.ARCET: OUTCOME: ACTIONS IMPROVEMENT PLPvN To increasg educaticnal achievjnsrl' ftjr all stidents special gniiasis (yi socJal stirlies. Mitdell Scliool darmstratirg nostcry of basic skills and caipetcncics will ircrca^s durijK- tip cW-irV-vl T.rso- QO n* U-, i-l KYJlTKr __1 r..__e* .. rj ' 1992-93 schoQ], yaar as evjfaTaad by tic AMP! and Stanfcri I^t. RESPONSIDILITY TIMELINE RESOURCES STAFF DEVELOPMENT evaluation data The contributitns of Africai Aiecicans and other cultures will becoie an Integral part of the cucriculun throu^ tte use of Gore Literature Ifcoks, suipLemental textbooks a^ resource peakers. Rxihlan-based learning strategies tdll lirit the school curriculun to work, jobs, and a chance at a better life. Field trips related to curricular learning experiaxEs will be schaiikd to eo^and aid extend sCudenl i krowled^. Oassroon Teadiers vns Oassroon Teachers Specialists G/T Teacher Oassrocm Teachers s' October 1992- Cfcgaing Septaifcer 1992- Ct^ing Septenfcer 1- CfcgDing VIES Resource Speakers IhpxivGd avoreness of various cultures IncEeased achievencnt Record of Field Trips (O ITARGET: OUTCOME r ACTIONS JMPRO VEA/RNT ELAN To increase educational adiievanenl\nfor all shidgits with special oni-.r^is in scifincG.____________________________ 'D'e n liter of students at Mitctell School cbra-igtrativie nestery of basic ddUs err J oenpetaxies will increax during die 1992-93 school year as eviderced by tie MT and Staifccd Test._____________________________________________ RESPONSIBILITY TIMELINE RESOURCES STAFF DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION DATA Test results vdll be examined to determine areas of greatest need. Staff Septaiber 15 lest results Ibeds identified ferm test results Individual inventcries of 6th grade students cn scierce concepts tested cn AlPT vdll be ccnpleted. Sixth Gfcade liaacher Special enpiiasis vail be plao d Ftincipal on providing learning experiences thcau^xut the curricular areas to prorote reading fee pleasure, protilem solving skills, demonstraticn learning, investigative projects, leal-wcrld learning and hand^ labcratcry experiences. Staff Septenter 15 Ctiaairg Ifesource Guides Garpleted inventories Stufent Prqgpess e V Ihtegcaticn of science ccnoepts vdth mere lends-tn scierce experiaxes vdll occur, ffire scienoe equtpiEn: Principal Classrran Teadxrs G/T Specialist Ajgust 31- Chgaiqg Currioulun Chide 3 Resource Student Progress AMT'Scores Observation Lessen Plans vdll be used to assist teachers in the delivery of instruotiai. I1 TARGET: OUTCOME: ACTIONS IMPRO VEMENT PLAN Hb nrixx of strricnts at Mi tdrill Sdwl cfaimstratixe mastery of basic .-idlls and ccrririeixifis wiil iivrease duniig tic 1992-03 scl-col year as evidfaioad by the AMT and Stanfccd Test. RESPONSIBILITY TIMELINE RESOURCES STAFF DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION DATA Sdcol-wide science fair Super Science Vfeekly will be utilized at all grade levels. Science centers will be utilized in all classrocms. Science cucriculim will be enpiesized throu^ extended day ptegram. Principal I^xil 15. Inservice with Lola fbrrltt (Carver Science Specialist) Student Ihrticipaticn Ejdrihi ts of Studait Projects leaders Science leachers Staff Principal Septoiber 15- CbgaiiTg Septenber 15- ChgpdiTg Septenber 28- Ch^ihg Increased interest in Science Increased test scores Student Progress Student Progress AMT Scctes Staaferd Soares 1 1 TARGET: OUTCOME\nACTIONS IMPROVEMENT PLAN To establida a climate cf edvraticnal exoellgnce,______________________,-------------------------...........------ A safe and orderly clinnte will be estsUieted to ensure the safety aai well-beipfj of the students as \\11 as the (Tinllty of their edjcatico.... -----------------......................................... RESPONSIBILITY TIMELINE RESOURCES STAFF DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION DATA Ihe principal and staff will utilise a variety of positive recogniticn strategies to erhanoe and prnnote student self-worth: -Positive phene calls -Positive notes -Stixtnt of the Itedc -Aadaiiic and Cit-12aTship Harr Rcdl  Hi^i expectaticns caxEmiiTg attendanoa and beipg on tine will be connrricated to students and parents. At risk studaats will be included as nmitocs, fire marshals, aitBssadccs, aid othsr positive redes in the schcnl. Students will receive canseling (vhole gretp, anall group, and in- dividal) to assist in the developTHit of self-wccth as well as pirohlem solving ati coping skills. Staff Staff Principal Cctnaalcc Staff Ffenters Goinselnr Ajgist 31- Olgplng Oigsing Aagpst 31- Qlgpihg Qagaing Rositixe bdaaxlcr So ident/Parent Feedback Letters to Parents  Extent Handbook Pecocd of students in activities Inpxived bebavicr c1 IMPROVEMENT PLAN TARCCT: OUTCOME: To establi.di a clirete of educational excellence, ____________________,_____________________________________ A safe and orderly climate will be estahUshed to ensure, ths afety and well-h\nirig of the stiriants as well as Hie qaaLlty of UiaU edratim.-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY TIMELINE RESOURCES STAFF DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION DATA The nintcring prolan will be expanded to include mote active participants. SJcecial activities/leaming experioices will be develped and inplemented to mete sPidents aware of their own vrriqiE cultural teritagp and imce avare of the diversity and nultiple perspectives of otlier cultures throu^ curricular infusicn. PecogiizB each porsn's birthdity over the intercon as well as witli a card. ^Bcial activities each 9 weeks for students cn citizariup honcr roll. Students will be given the oppcctvnity to participate CoLTBelcc Principal Principal Staff Ocunsslca: Staff in extra-ojrricLilar activitifii\nOTgaing Chgping August-31- Chgaing KbvHiher 1- Chgcdng October 1- Chgcdng VIES Principal Staff Hjltiadtural Ffaterials RecEtd of Ffentccs Bulletin boards di^pl^ Ibsitive school climate Recctd cf resource persons Increased sebf-^odh Ihpxwed cliuHte IirpTOvcd clinate Ibsitive student participa ticn that will Include: -QTesrleading/ii-ill lean -Science Club -School NswBpEjper 1 -Just Say No -Drara Club ! -St?. I 'ilUiT .ij.Dprans1 IMPROVEMENT PLAN TARGET: OUTCOME: To estah1di a cUirete of edir-aticnal excellence.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A safe and orderly dirate will be estdii^ to ensure tbe safety and ueU-beirg of the students as well as the qiHUty rf their eAcation.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ACTIONS RESPONSIBILITY TIMELINE RESOURCES STAFF DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION DATA Bctensive strategies wlU be inplaiEnted to erhstice student/student interacticn. 1 Teadiers CoLffisekr Ajgust 31- Chgptibg Improved studait/student relatienshipe Districtwide Hjnen Relaticns Survey J.TARGCT: OUTCOME: IMrRO VEMENT PLAN Tn dilutes of eAcatlnm,! exceUenpe in all sdcqls. lb secure MitcfElI foe tie safety of students, staff, and parents. actions RESPONSIBILITY TIMELINE RESOURCES STAFP DEVELOPMEITT EVALUATION DATA Safety aid security drills yrill be inpflaiEnted cn a regular basis: -fire Drill -Torailo Etill -BuUet EtiJl -Reverse lire Drill Safety aid security buildingwide plan will be updated and djared with all staff (lenhers. - Principal Staff Principal Staff Ajgust 31 digpiuig AugLJSt 31 Qigpirig Inprc^ed performanoe ojrir^ restive occucrences Irrptwed respond to vrptedicahle occurenoes All LRSD Staff not tasad at MLtchell Jdll J\u0026gt;ear ic^tifioaticn tadgps. (Miintenanoe, bus drivers, etc.) LRSD Ahrinistrative August 31 Qjgaing Inpxwed Security AU doors to the main building aid auxilliary buildiiig wiU be kept locked, except the main entrance. AU guests and visLtors will enter the buUding thrci#i the frait entrance. Mrcipal Qjstodians Instructienal Aides AugLBt 31 Ctig3iJTg Secured baildJjTg Rdncipal Staff August 31 Chgripg Secured buildirigTARGET: OUTCOME: JMPROVER/ENT PLAN Tn Psrnblirfi rlimates of educat:icn4 e2C--llenoe in ai\nsdrolg.  lb secure Mitdiell for the safety of students, staff, and parents. actions RESPONSIBILITY TIMELINE RESOURCES STAFI- DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION DATA AU visiters and volvnteers to the building will sigr in at liTB office and r^iear visitcr/guest badgps. Principal leaciiers Augjst 31 Secured biiiding AU dsors to classrocms with glass will be kept clear. Principal Tfiadiers Ajgust 31 Secured building I 1 TARGET: * OUTCOME: lb inoJBase parental ccmntilty actions terent Ibndbocks will be distributed to all parents. Rrrent Ni^ will be held to ergpxkr parental sn^xxt foe tie year. terent Seminars (1 per 9 vedcs) will be held to assist parents with ^dlls for building self-esteem AS ^11 as nntivaring theic chilciren. Learning letters fee parents cn a variety of educaticnally- related issues wUl go Ime edcly. Check Lb Out Day each nine wedrs fcr paiEnts to visit school. IMPRO VEMENT PLAN invoKgrgit at btitdisU. ELementary during 1992-93 school year^ RESPONSIBILITY TIMELINE resources STAPH DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION DATA Principal Principal Principal Oxreelcc ferent Ifendbock SepteniET 8 tfavaiber 1- Chgaing Navenber 1- Chgping P^C VIPS teccid of parental attendance Ibrent Feedtack Eferaital Attendance tene visits will be utilised by all staff maibers to er^der parental iiKrolrement, Staff Septenfcer 28 Chgping [fecord of hmc visits teoogaiticn of Itont of tte nonth. Tfiaers OairBsloc Septenber 30 Chadng tecord cf arardsT.ARGET: OUTCOME: actions IMPRO YEMENI' ELAN Th irY^ mtoiral caminltv irrolx^mL at.MitcfeU Elgnentary Ariiy, 1992-93 sdwljg^ RESPONSIBILITY TIMELINE RESOURCES STAFF DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION DATA * 1 Teachers will assess and utilize the talents and resojcoes of jBcents and schxl patrens ty foonal and infcunal to aid in developdng a rescurce directory. dasstoon Teadiers Principal P.TJL Ctmseloc Septenter \u0026amp;- Ch@3ihg Ccrrpilatien of school-wide resource directccy Priiripal's Ifesitive Hxne (hl Is. PcincitHl Tiaachets Ajgjst 31- . Ctgaiiig Reoocd of time calls PTA bfaifcerdTip Hl will a PEA Beard Etwcifal AjgLBt 31- CtT^:ing . Record of atterdanoe njiter of strategies will be anplDyed to encouragp attendance at parent neetingslODM Visits to LRSD Schools, Opening Days 1994 Mitchell Incentive School We were pleased to note that:  The interior of the building had been freshly painted in a blue and white color scheme that coordinated with the carpet installed during the spring of 1994.  The school's new creed was prominently displayed in the foyer.  New carpet had been installed in the second-floor hallway.  Students were well-behaved and friendly. We also noted some areas needing attention. ODM observed several of these same problems during our May 1994 visit to the school and documented them in a letter filed with the Court on June 2, 1994. The problem areas now include:  Exterior paint was peeling badly around the second floor windows.  Extensive roof leaks had caused great damage to the ceilings and carpet in both the reading and math labs. These leaks began over a year ago.  The library also had a serious problem with a roof leak that has left a gaping 4' x 3' hole in the ceiling.  Window screens were missing.  Exterior doors badly need repainting.  Florescent lights in the cafeteria were missing their covers.  Part of the campus fence was in such a poor state of repair that passersby had easy access to the school grounds.  Work that should have been completed before children returned to school was left unfinished. Painters still had work to complete during the first week of school, and the contractor had not begun work on the re-roofing.5 ^11 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Mitchell Elementary School 24*\u0026amp; Battery Streets Phone 324-2415 Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 May 12, 1994 Dr. Henry Williams LRSD Superintendent 810 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 PEC r3ST\\ NT,!-'! 7 MAY 17 199A Dr. Williams, OflicQ of Desegrei: h. 'J We, the undersigned have drafted this letter in response to the article in the Arknasas Democrat-Gazette, dated May 7th, regarding principal assigments. In reading the article, we found that our current principal. Dr. Samuel Branch has been reassigned and we're writing to let you know of our displeasure with this news. Dr.Branch has come to this year, from an institution of higher learning, far removed from the atmosphere and operation of elementary school. We want to let you know that we feel he needs at least another year at Mitchell School, before being moved, for two reasons:!) it sends a message to the community that our school is an unstable environment for students of any race and this thinking impairs our ability to recruit and 2) we would like for him to have an opportunity to perform the duties of a principal to the best of his ability since we trust that he was assigned to Mitchell initially for his ability. He has spent this year learning the ins and outs of the fairly complex Little Rock School District system. We wish to let you know that we want to give him a chance to utilize his strengths as an administrator. us, year an Please consider giving him an opportunity to do just that. Sincerely, Mitchell Elementary Parents cc: Judge Weber-WrightOffice of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 June 2, 1994 Fli-eo, eastern district The Honorable Susan Webber Wright U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas P.O. 3316 Little Rock, AR 72201 JUM - 2 139+ Bl/:. OEP CtERK Dear Judge Wright: During the process of monitoring the six incentive schools in the Little Rock School District (LRSD) this year, we recently concluded visits to Franklin, Garland, Mitchell, Rightsell, Stephens, and Rockefeller. We are presently preparing a comprehensive incentive school monitoring report that will include findings based upon ese on-site inspections. During our May visits to the incentive schools, we noted problems with the Franklin and Mitchell facilities that alarm us. Because our complete report will not be published until later this summer, I am filing this short, preliminary report to alert the Court and the parties to conditions at Franklin and Mitchell that need immediate correction before staff and students return to those buildings next school term. The comments are excerpted from the draft Facilities Section of our incentive school report and, therefore, include our positive observations as well as notations describing conditions needing prompt attention. The LRSD is presently petitioning the Court to close Stephens Incentive School, citing the declining condition\" and \"structural problems\" of that facility as among the reasons for seeking to close it. By immediately tending to needed repairs at Franklin and Mitchell, the LRSD will be able to prevent declining conditions that could lead to structural problems at those two buildings. Quick attention to facility needs should help the district avoid any appearance that it is failing to maintain incentive schools as a basis for eventually closing them due to deterioration. Sincerely yours, Ann S. Brown Enc. CC: All Parties and Counsel of Record ODM Observations of the Facilities at Franklin and Mitchell Incentive Schools When the monitors visited the incentive schools in the spring of 1993-94, we noted several problems with the facilities at both Franklin and Mitchell. Below is our description of the conditions we observed at those two schools, followed by a summary list of problems that require immediate attention. Franklin: The Franklin facility has deteriorated visibly since the last monitoring visit we made during the 1992-93 school year. The roof leaks that have plagued the school for years persist, leaving damaged ceilings throughout the building. Gaping holes mar the cafeteria ceiling, and the ceiling of the principals office collapsed a few weeks prior to our visit. Rainwater also floods under doors into one office and a classroom on the third level of the building. On the first level, both ceiling and floor tiles have deteriorated and are unattractive. Walls throughout the interior are grubby and unattractive. The Franklin custodians have spot- painted some walls, but the spots stand out conspicuously because the new paint does not match the old. The district made several improvements to the schools exterior during 1993-94. Workers removed some old, dangerous wooden equipment from the playground and replaced it with more modem equipment salvaged from Ish Incentive School, which closed at the end of the 1992-93 school year. Four-year-olds received an additional climbing structure in their play area and the assistant principal reported that the PTA and Student Council were working cooperatively on future projects for playground improvements. Mitchell: Our previous reports on the incentive schools have praised the Mitchell facility. Indeed the 1908 structure designed by Charles Thompson, Arkansas most noted architect, is beautifully designed and appears structurally sound. But several areas of the building have fallen into disrepair. During 1993. we noted a severe ceiling leak in the reading room. During the past year, the math classroom next door developed a similar problem. Teachers told us that district workers made several attempts to correct the problem, but the leaks have nevertheless persisted. The district installed new carpet in each classroom during the spring of 1994, but the unabated leaks ruined the ceilings and the new carpet in both these classrooms, leaving an objectionable musty smell. The new carpet in other parts of the building looks fresh and neat, but its slate blue color clashes with the earth-toned walls. When the district renovated Mitchell several years ago, the architects took care to select a color palette appropriate to the period of the schools construction. The new carpet ignores those earlier efforts, and gives the interior a rather hodgepodge appearance. The multi-story building includes a basement that houses the cafeteria, kitchen, and minimal classroom space. The stairs leading down to one section of the basement have become so tilted, due to settling of the building, that they present a danger to solid footing. Workers had replaced the broken floor tiles noted in our 1992-1993 report, but several of the brown and white floor tiles, used throughout the first floor of the building, were loose when we visited this time.The exterior of the building includes some commendable improvements and some obvious needs. The schools entry area is now pleasantly adorned by a large flower bed planted with blooming annuals. The four-year-old children have an additional play structure designed for their use, but it is inconveniently located and inaccessible from their classroom. The youngsters must leave their room and walk into the main building to find the only exit that leads to this fenced play area. The buildings exterior trim paint has begun to flake off in some areas, signaling the need for scraping and repainting. Summary Listing of Conditions Requiring Immediate Correction Franklin: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Ceiling leaks Ceilings damaged by leaks Holes in the cafeteria ceiling Collapsed ceiling in the principals office Dirty walls Mismatched spot painting Flooding from rainwater on the third level Deteriorated ceiling and floor tiles on the first level Mitchell: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Ceiling leaks Ceilings damaged by leaks Carpets damaged by leaks Tilted basement stairs Loose floor tiles Peeling exterior paintsw % 9f Little Rock School District OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT June 21, 1994 JUN 2 4 1994 a 3 Mrs. Ann Brown, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 East Markham Street, Suite 520 Heritage West Building Otiics cf Dssegreg\nion iw '3 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ann: I have enclosed for your perusal and records a copy of a document that was forwarded to me by Mr. Eaton in response to your partial report on the physical condition of particularly Mitchell and Franklin. the incentive schools. The report provided by Mr. Eaton seems to suggest that the buildings are not being neglected and are on a regular maintenance schedule and obviously do receive special consideration when circumstances warrant special attention. It might be a good idea, Ann, for us to meet with Doug regarding the incentive schools so that you and your people are aware of what the capital plans call for with regard to the repairs of all District facilities. Should you require additional information on the incentive schools. please let me know, and 1*11 get it for you. In the meantime. please consider the possibility of scheduling a meeting with Doug to look at all of the facilities. Sincerely, H. P. Williams Superintendent of Schools HPW:nr Encl. 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, .Arkansas 72201  (501) 834-2000 10/21/94 09:07 .501 324 2032 L R School Dlst ODM @002.-002 October 21,1994 Little Rock School District News Releasp For more information.- Dina Teague, 324-2020 The Dallas Opera presents the students at Mitchell Creative Dramatics puppet opera, tAonkey See, Monkey Do foi performance is a sneak preview of the Elementary School today at 1:00 pjn. The International Children's Festival at WUdwood Park this program which will be presented at the Based on a Mexican folktale, weekend. provide an entertaining introduction the work uses both English and Spanish to Commissioned by The Dallas to opera for elementary school students. created by Dallas composer Robert Xavier opera in 1986, Monkey See, Monkey Do was features music recorded and performed by Voices Rodriquez and librettist Mary Duren, and of Change. ### 810 West Markhaiu Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  \u0026lt;501)324-2000FIELD TRIPS TAKEN AT MITCHELL ACADEMY OF EXCELLENCE 1995 - 96 SCHOOL YEAR AUGUST OLIVER\" at Murray's Dinner Playhouse - 6th Grade SEPTEMBER Goodson's Apple Orchard - Kindergarten Heifer Project International - 3rd Grade Aerospace Center/IMAX Theatre 4th Grade OCTOBER Weather Station - Sth Grade Arkansas State Fair - Kindergarten and 1st Grade Pumpkin Patch - Kindergarten and Pre - K Rightsell Elementary Communication Fair - Ms. Stubblefield's 4th Grade Wildwood Park for the Performing Arts, Children's Festival - Sth and 6th Grades Central Arkansas Library - 1st and 2nd Grades Memphis Botanical Garden and Pink Palace Museum - 6th Grades Aerospace Center/IMAX Theatre - Sth Grades Toltect Mound State Park - Sth Grades NOVEMBER Safari Park - 2nd Grade DECEMBER Caesar's Pizza - Pre- - KJANUARY Arkansas Arts Center Children's Theatre, Three Little Pigs/Billy Goat Gruff 1st and 2nd Grades FEBRUARY Arkansas Arts Center Children's Theatre, African Tales - All Grades Shorter College, Fargo Agricultural Museum Play - 5th Grade MARCH (Spring Break 81-22) Liberty Hill Taekwondo - 2nd Grade APRIL Museum of Science and Natural History/Arkansas Arts Center Art Exhibit Ms. Regnier's Class Little Rock Zoo - Kindergarten MAY Riverfest - Kindergarten and 1st GradesSPECIAL PROGRAMS AT MITCHELL ACADEMY OF EXCELLENCE SEPTEMBER Ashanti Tale in Movement with Music - Ms. Stubblefield's 4th Grade Taiwanese Dancers Assembly Yoruba Naming Ceremony - Mr. Calhoun's 4th Grade OCTOBER Pre K- 3rd Grades Dancing, Singing and Storytelling Assembly Mrs. Peaches, Storyteller Assembly Wildwood Performance with 5th and 6th Grades Halloween Assembly for Pre-K through 3rd Grades NOVEMBER American Education Week and Book Week Assembly Game Show - 4th Grades Traveling to the Planets - Ms. James' Sth Grade The Regions of the United States - Ms. Walker's Sth Grade DECEMBER Original Play by Extended Day Drama Class for Sth and 6th Grades Holiday Program JANUARY Martin Luther King Day Assembly FEBRUARY Parents' Appreciation Luncheon Creative Dramatics Sharing Time Pre-K through 3rd Grade African American Heritage Assembly Martin Luther King Speech Contest - Kindergarten Boy Scouts Blue and Gold BanquetMARCH Concert Pianist, Mr. Patton (Assembly) Girl Scouts Induction and Fashion Show Signs of Spring Creative Dramatics Sharing Time Pre K - 3rd Grade Chef Michelle de Preux, Capitol Hotel, (Assembly) Fireman, Mr. Benton, Fire Prevention (Assembly) APRIL Arkansas Arts Center Actor, Eileen Doss, Kindergarten Hats Off Program Pre K - 3rd Grades Hats on Parade - Kindergarten MAY Creative Dramatics Festival Mitchell Olympics \\ COMPLETED THEME IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES ACADEMIC YEAR 1995-1996 1st Quarter School: Mitchell Academy of Excellence Specialist: Mary Trulock, Creative Dramatics AUGUST Made plans with teachers on presentations for the upcoming year in creative dramatics. Fourth through sixth graders will present their activities as \"Umojo time every other Friday. The younger grades will present from class to class. Met with Wildwood Center for the Performing Arts, our partners in education, to discuss possibilities of joining four other schools in their Children's Festival. Ms. Hansen, our Music Specialist and Mr. Milton, our Art Specialist will take part in the planning process. (As will our 4th through 6th grade teachers.) Began scheduling Field Trips for the entire school. Met with teachers on their planning times to provide curriculum based activities in creative dramatics. Released my schedule which will place me in every classroom each week for thirty minutes. SEPTEMBER Ms. Hansen and myself met with artists involved with the Children's Festival and decided upon Nigeria as a country which we would represent. I then scheduled three artists to come into the fourth through sixth grades. Faye Hansen, a story- teller worked with our fourth grades, Zinsi Agini, an African dancer worked with our fifth grades and Marsha Wallace, a visual artist, worked with our sixth grades. Other Creative Dramatic Activities: Pre K - Began teaching students a warm up and general ballet movements. Kindergarten - Kindergacen - Creative Movement/Apple Seeds, Trees, Foods. Acted our Mrs. Wishy Washy. Animal Movement. First Grade - Creative Movement/ Acted our The Barn Danee by learning Square Dance. Second Grade - Creative Movement/Mirroring.  Created our own restaurants and used play money and our own menus to order from. OCTOBER Third Grade - Acted out \"Imaginary Animals which students named, drew. invented habitats, foods the animals ate and original movement. October was another month that the Wildwood artists worked with our fourth through sixth grade students. The students went to Wildwood October 22nd and 22rd to perform and help with the craft table. The event was a huge success. Other Creative Dramatic Activities: Pre K - Continued teaching pre-ballet movements. Kindergarten - Creative Movement/Animal Movement. First Grade - Storytelling with Flannel Board/Rainbow Crow. Second Grade - Wrote Haikus and put movement to them. (Recitation and Movement) Third Grade - Acted out The Big Pumpkin and made up skits to reinforce safety at Halloween. Fourth Grade - Performed Anansi at performed at Rightsell Elementarv. \"Umojo\" time for Mitchell students and alsoSchool: COMPLETED THEME IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES ACADEMIC YEAR 1995-1996 2nd Quarter Mary Trulock NOVEMBER Pre - K - Pre-Ballet Kindergarten and First Grades - Storytelling with Flannel Board/ The Girl That Loved Wild Horses and The Dream Catcher Story. Second Grade - The Five Senses in Creative Movement Third Grade - Introduction to Opera rt Fourth Grade - Fifth Grade - Sixth Grade - Game Show and Yoruba Naming Ceremony Hansel and Gretel\" Build Gingerbread House Umogo - \"Traveling to the Planets Tt Introduction to Opera - tt 'Aida\" Scenework and \"The Regions of the U.S. (Info. Plavs DECEMBER (On Maternity Leave) K, 1, 2, Teachers continued work in storytelling and extended day activities 3 - Continued work on Hansel and Gretel 4-6 Continued work on extended day activities Umojo - Sth and 6th graders performed original musical for holiday program! JANUARY Pre- K - Pre Ballet Review and walks, jumps Kindergarten - Began work forlFebruary Program Counting in Swahili and Jafta with First Grade - Acted out The Miller's Sons, a French folktale and the Bear and the Owl moving picture puppet\nSecond Grade - Painted Imaginary Boxes with four different kinds of music, then drew to the same music/A music interpretation activity. Third Grades - Began work on February Program reciting Shadow with movement and music. Fourth Grades - Recited excerpts from Maya Angelou's Wouldn't Take Nothing for Mv Journey Now. Fifth Grades - Worked on Conflict Resolution Scenes Sixth Grades - Began studying what it takes to attain their future professions... Went through college guide books to look into different courses, finally put together scenes from the future. Performed for Umojo.COMPLETED THEME IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES ACADEMIC YEAR 1995-1996 3rd Quarter School:Mitchell Academy of Excell Mary Trulock FEBRUARY Pre- K - Ballet jumps and leaps, practiced warm up and presentation. Kindergarten - Continued work on program. Counting in Swahili with African clothing and Jafta,with African Clothing as well. (See January_ First Grades - Worked on The Ants and the Grasshoppers with movement and masks for the presentation. Second Grades - Worked on Movement and Science.... Diffemt Forms of Energy. Students were beams of light traveling and electrical currents! Another class worked on a Tribute to Louis Armstrong for presenting. They sang and did movement to\"What a Wonderful World\". Third Grades - After presenting Shadow, they began working on making their own puppets and doing skits about magnets, force and gravity. MARCH Fourth Grades - Presented two skits, one on Harriet Tubman and one on the Underground Railroad. Presented for Umojo. Fifth Grades - Continued Conflict Resolution Scenes. Sixth Grades - Performed their scenes from the future for Umojo. March - Planning for a short tt through 3rd March 13th. Signs of Spring Presentation\" for grades Pre-K Students will be presented puppet show, dances with the parachute, storytelling. Fifth Graders will be presenting scenes from Roll of Thunder Hear My Cry and Famous African Americans with a Spiritual Dance for Umojo. APRILVIDEOS AVAILABLE (Documentacion of Special Programs) Umojo Programs - 4th through 6th Grades Stubblefield - 4th Grade Tales from the Ashanti, September 95 and Excerpts from Maya Angelou, February 96 Calhoun - 4th Grade Scenes from Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad, February 96 Walker - 5th Grade History Presentation, March 96 James - 5th Grade Scenes from Roll of Thunder Hear My Cry, March 96 Glover - 6th Grade Class Scenes from the Future-Careers, March 96 Whole School Programs African American Heritage Assembly Program, February 96 Girl Scout Inductions, March 96 Concert Pianist, Mr. Patton, March 96 Martin Luther King Speech Contest I Have A Dream\" Kindergarten Performs and Whole School is invited, February 96 II, February 29, 1996 Dear Teachers and Parents, After looking at the attached document, please complete the survey below. Also, feel free to make notes and suggestions on your copy of Che document. We are in the third year of our Creative Dramatics' theme and would like your input on reviewing the program. We appreciate your time and efforts. Please return the survey by March 8, 1996. 1) Do you think our theme of Creative Dramatics is working to provide students with opportunities to work together, become better listeners. and effective speakers? Give examples. Yes, they are learning to speak in front of a group and work together. Yes, our students are learning to perform in many ways, speaking, listening, acting, memorization skills, etc. 2) Do you believe that students are becoming bettef speakers with the use of Creative Dramatics? Be specific. Yes, I believe they are learning to enunciate more clearly and think about what they are saying. Yes, they are learning to articulate and control their tone to project to an audience without a microphone. Yes, I noticed this during your recent salute to African Americans. 3) Are students provided with opportunities to be spontaneous, creative and critical thinkers? Yes. I have noticed in my daughter how she is more outspoken around family and Yes, in theclassroom we \"act out words\netc.-------------------- tt friends. small passages or even pantomime different 4) Are students Involved in making choices in dramatic situations? Yes. Yes, many times they create their own plays or dances.5) Fourth through sixth grade students only - When taking on the role of a character are students understanding values and beliefs from other cultures and/or other times in history? Yes, we discuss in depth the meanings of the different fables and folktales from around the world. 6) Kindergarten through third grades only - Are students understanding the importance of effective communication through memorizing I believe they need more practice in these things. and recitations? Finally, parents, are your students informing you about \"sharing times\" performances here at Mitchell? and Are you receiving the flyers from Mitchell Academy of Excellence? Please list the performances or which you have been invited to attend. If sharing timesIt PTfl Wildwood Park for the Performing Arts 20919 Denny Road Little Rock. AR 7221 I USA [5011 S21-PARK (72 7 51 FAX [501J 821-7230 -Ann C'.horard Founder/Artisttc Director October 26, 1995 Mitchell Elementary Mary Trulock 2410 Battery Little Rock, AR 72206 Dear Mary, On behalf of the staff and patrons of Wildwood Park for the Performing Arts, I would like to give you a round of applause for giving so much of your time and talent to the fifth annual Wildwood International Childrens Festival. This year was the best year we have ever had and it is all due to everyones participation and effort. The children had a grand time learning from the various areas as did the adults. We hope that you will join us again in the future. Again, thank you so much for the gift of your time and talents to help make our International Childrens Festival possible. Sincerely, Ann Chotard Founder/Artistic Director Wildwood Park for the Performing Ares is a non-profit ^01 -cl i charity regiicercd in /.lttl\\ Hoik. XrLinv.\n' \\\\ .lev I'oJ Park tor thi tninu ,\\rt\u0026gt; i \\h WiuW^Di?  I August 9, 1995 Ms. Mary Truelock 28410 Kanis Little Rock. AR 72208 Dear Mary, Thi.s is in reference to our phone conversation on August 4, 1995. We are so pleased to have your class participate during this year s Wildwood International Children's Festival on October 21st (10am - 4pm) and 22nd (Noon - 5pm), 1995. We will open the gates to the park 30 minutes prior to our \"opening\" times in order for people to set up. At this time I have not been able to gather enough information to schedule events in the African Village so I am unsure of your performance time. I should be able to provide you with this information after August 31, 1995. There will be a \"dressing\" area behind the dance stage in the Celebration Tent that is 30 ft wide and approximately 10 ft deep. Please let me know of any other requests by August 31, 1995 so that I can compile all the requests to determine if we can provide everythin\ng- Again, we are pleased to have your participation and gratefully acknowledge your gift of time and talent. If you have any questions or require anytiiiiig else, please do not hesitate to call me at 821-7275 ext. 261. Sincerely, Ann Spatz ' Artistic Administrator   I i.iTk : ! II 'IIIiJ Park for ihi rf.'pnnnu .Arts '*! i H tun R.kuI v-a. \\R raiI rAKK r\n  : I I ' . I'\n' August 9, 1995 Dear Music! Words! Opera! Participant, What an incredible week folks! To begin with I think you should all be commended for having given so much of your time. I am a firm believer in time being the most precious gift a person can give. Many of you requested a contact base. We are going to slart with this \"newsletter.\" As a reminder I need a copy of your Partnership Plans by August 15, 1995. (I have not received any yet.) I will then put them in your ne.\\t \"newsletter.\" Please be sure to state whether your Partnership Plan is your plan for this year or a dream plan. I am also taking suggestions for a title of our newsletter. The only suggestion so far has been \"Standing O Vations.\" In respect of your time I plan to keep ese letters to the point. If you need to call me (and feel free to do so!) my number is (501) 821-PARK(7275) ext 261. I certainly enjoyed meeting ail of you. Take care, i v V. \\nn Spatz-^ \\  / Artistic Administrator at Wildwood Park for the Performing Arts P.S. Concerning the International Children's Festival, I have enclosed a separate letter. V' r k I k \\ \\ 'A I Ju I I,irk hir \u0026lt; lu I, rlortniiiu ,1 11 1  \\rr\nI . August 10, 1995 Dear Music! Words! Opera! Participant, We are so pleased to have the participants from your school during this year's Wildwood International Children's Festival on October 21st (10am - 4pm) and 22nd (Noon - 5pm), 1995. We will open the gates to the park 30 minutes prior to our \"opening\" times in order for people to set up. We are trying to lay out the space and time requirements for the Childrens Festival. I have only heard from approximately 15% of you as to how you plan to participate, which is creating some difficulty in planning this Festival. Please let me know by August 31, 1995 so that 1 may ensure that there are adequate provisions made. For those of you who are sending a visual display, we are now setting up a \"gaUery\" in the park for that weekend. What you plan to bring will determine where you will be at Wildwood. Visual displays will be in the \"Gallery\n\" African related performances will be in the African Village\nNonAfrican performances will be in the Celebration Tent. Once 1 receive how you plan to participate, 1 will send you a letter confirming your performance time or your space provisions (for visual displays). I would like to emphasize that bringing these \"performances\" from your schools is a learning experience for all of us this year. I don't want you to feel pressured. Please bring whatever you are comfortable with. Performances can be five to thirty minutes. Remember that we are exploring this year to find out what works. Again, we are pleased to have your participation and gratefully acknowledge your gift of time and talent. If you have any questions or require anything else, please do not hesitate to call me at 821-7275 ext. 261. Sincerely, 5 4- Ann Spatz' J ( J Artistic Administrator I  I [Ju o\u0026gt;d Park lor liu-i\\' rt.'rniin Arts . !' Pl. un\\ lU :\u0026lt; k. \\(\u0026lt; ?2-* \u0026lt;! nr 'A t'!i -u cn 1 ? 1996 1 i 0 Battery tie Rock, Elementary School St . AR \"2206 r Mary: e loc to ta rng 1 sr'.vard to our inie e this opportun,\nwith you and your recon irm the particulars Cl IJ   1: :a) and time I. 1996 I c: r :45 Total cost : $000.00 .-ncutc ved: 000.00 ance due: $000.00 performing artii ts wi 1 need access pro' mately one hour prior to the performance to the performan appreciate having fou or Live Also, load-in an students available to heir \u0026gt;- won Ir\niir iclosed i out, bef o a no -'I L the performance. (are) one (1) study guide. Please feel duplicate these materials as needed and distribute to participating teachers. to :b uld you have questions concerning any aspect of our vis lease direct your calls 1 at 501/321-7275. to either me or the Associate Dr t Cl .-.OC Gideons Market ng Director losures LV X. 75^- ieOi t^ir. ir ** '*N'*^*iw' **\u0026gt;^'\"** iBBiswrawww 7\u0026gt;W 9 \u0026lt;( .ri' ' - Lu\u0026lt; - t: \u0026lt;! wimwooo **  ^'T' \" iJ V.U^'.' 3 r-'-?. r f. I ,r=^ \u0026lt;- nw rS.  si at\ni.f'-\"' A-u tsps-  O  T ^CTober 22 ' -\u0026lt;5:. \\:r- ' =O- - Shuie)y:^iKg^ :i\n* I  W^^iS?a1?arfc for the Pei^rmhiig Rrad  Little. sf^.i' t N-luJ -i t- ----------1'  ?i5  On TheSradioi^i Qdunce^dOO Goown'^Baj^lkV yj. ira 9\u0026amp;l r^' M- \" fe^tmii Dance '^2*S fr^ . Kt.- 3^ b:?. ''^~ !4  ig\u0026lt;il- ^. fe^ri^  Jti i\n?  a ss 'S'  On The Puppel^^^ Chameieon The Dall^Op \u0026gt;- '^3?' The/!^rSm^ i. Aciiyi^^X^ yi \u0026gt;rf-'l a.* iaas 1. ki^ JLih :\nti ?Si: ternational Music .A^'.x^ \u0026lt;ii ' ' ^'1 ainera^ !} ? -fli  - rf i^ent hfe]f:j^lelo\u0026lt;Mras Rea \u0026amp; ' St\u0026amp;myrandB^toc Potters ^:'^''*'\n^^'Vt I T k*--'. . y-i ^l^^^^turdStory Telling ^Iri^SAround e Worid WfijSwas^ii' \u0026gt;' \n '^'v'S v4, -?r!^i'ir.i-'K   -ryg?*\nI\n:*\n^4^Mg3 rrjKjwH rr i-r r(4' nit t\n\u0026gt;1 ' i i* 'r-i ^irJU8f3f?ii V.r.i\nSSirLiA3Si: rj 3J ^^iCWi AduIts'^l^^^^Jjani^ ^1 gs-l^z y'=*4?M\u0026gt;.S ^K\u0026amp;ail^le e day of Sss^i|'1.' \u0026amp; 1^' V '15 'ii^ I t j eH^L*^ U ? '3-'' ^or^^^ 'jrJ i '.\"' b ' '^i iif t\nK *A ^-fesih '.^Xt^t-^Wyt^nn*! i! I -nr i'^  t 'ft ifirS tr^^r Ji B  Gy^p*  k\nINCENTIVE SCHOOL THEME COMMITTEE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ACADEMIC YEAR 1995-1996 4PR / 6 }9% Office of ^^segregsiio^i MITCHELL ELEMENTARY INCENTIVE SCHOOL 1. Principal Dr. Marjorie Bassa 2. Theme Specialist Mary Trulock 3. Primary Teacher Ms. Ross, Ms. Shorter, Ms. Govan, Ms. Allen, Ms. Blackwell 4. Intermediate Teacher Ms. Stubblefield, Ms. James, Ms. Glover 5. Parent S (V\\s. O^cG Caoo (joc.\\ I , Uorrcune- LoctcKtirA- 5^ 6. Non-certified jryVa.\\ vtrfis CJt Support Personnel Ms. Guinn 7. Certified Specialist(s) Mary Ann Hansen, Ken Milton, Chris Gonterman 8. Partner(s) in Education Wildwood Park for the Performing Arts MacDonalds on AsherAUGUST  'OLIVER' FIELD TRIPS TAKEN AT MITCHELL ACADEMY OF EXCELLENCE 1995 - 96 SCHOOL YEAR received A/ APQ 1 61996 at Murrays Dinner Playhouse - 6th Grade SEPTEMBER onice of Desegregation Monitoring Goodson's Apple Orchard - Kindergarten Heifer Project International - 3rd Grade Aerospace Center/IMAX Theatre 4th Grade OCTOBER Weather Station - 5th Grade Arkansas State Fair - Kindergarten and 1st Grade Pumpkin Patch - Kindergarten and Pre - K Rightsell Elementary Communication Fair - Ms. Stubblefield's 4th Grade Wildwood Park for the Performing Arts, Children's Festival - 5th and 6th Grades Central Arkansas Library - 1st and 2nd Grades Memphis Botanical Garden and Pink Palace Museum - 6th Grades Aerospace Center/IMAX Theatre - 5th Grades Toltect Mound State Park - 5th Grades NOVEMBER Safari Park - 2nd Grade DECEMBER Caesar's Pizza - Pre L KJANUARY Arkansas Arts Center Children's Theatre, Three Little Pigs/Bllly Goat Gruff 1st and 2nd Grades FEBRUARY Arkansas Arts Center Children's Theatre, African Tales - All Grades Shorter College, Fargo Agricultural Museum Play - 5th Grade MARCH (Spriftg Break 81-22) Liberty Hill Taekwondo - 2nd Grade APRIL Museum of Science and Natural History/Arkansas Arts Center Art Exhibit Ms. Regnier's Class Little Rock Zoo - Kindergarten MAY Riverfest - Kindergarten and 1st Grades \u0026lt;1SPECIAL PROGRAMS AT MITCHELL ACADEMY OF EXCELLENCE SEPTEMBER Ashanti Tale in Movement with Music - Ms. Stubblefield's 4th Grade Taiwanese Dancers Assembly Yoruba Naming Ceremony - Mr. Calhoun's 4th Grade OCTOBER Pre K- 3rd Grades Dancing, Singing and Storytelling Assejj^ly Mrs. Peaches, Storyteller Assembly Wildwood Performance with Sth and 6th Grades ' J Halloween Assembly for Pre-K through 3rd Grades NOVEMBER American Education Week and Book Week Assembly Won/for/ng Game Show - 4th Grades Traveling to the Planets - Ms. James' Sth Grade The Regions of the United States - Ms. Walker's Sth Grade DECEMBER Original Play by Extended Day Drama Class for Sth and 6th Grades Holiday Program JANUARY Martin Luther King Day Assembly FEBRUARY Parents' Appreciation Luncheon Creative Dramatics Sharing Time Pre-K through 3rd Grade African American Heritage Assembly Martin Luther King Speech Contest - Kindergarten Boy Scouts Blue and Gold BanquetMARCH Concert Pianist, Mr. Patton (Assembly) Girl Scouts Induction and Fashion Show Signs of Spring Creative Dramatics Sharing Time Pre K - 3rd Grade Chef Michelle de Preux, Capitol Hotel, (Assembly) Fireman, Mr. Benton, Fire Prevention (Assembly) APRIL Arkansas Arts Center Actor, Eileen Doss, Kindergarten Hats Off Program Pre K - 3rd Grades Hats on Parade - Kindergarten DRuaamia/o CowcBKn\" MAY Creative Dramatics Festival Mitchell Olympics \\ School: COMPLETED THEME IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES ACADEMIC YEAR 1995-1996 1st Quarter h,!' \"A J t 6 W6 =\u0026gt; 01 o.,., Monitoring AUGUST Mitchell Academy of Excellence Specialist: Mary Trulock, Creative Dramatics Made plans with teachers on presentations for the upcoming year in creative dramatics. Fourth through sixth graders will present their activities as 'Umojo\" time every other Friday. The younger grades will present from class to class. Met with Wildwood Center for the Performing Arts, our partners in education, to discuss possibilities of joining four other schools in their Children's Festival. Ms. Hansen, our Music Specialist and Mr. Milton, our Art Specialist will take part in the planning process. (As will our 4th through 6th grade teachers.) Began scheduling Field Trips for the entire school. Met with teachers on their planning times to provide curriculum based activities in creative dramatics. Released my schedule which will place me in every classroom each week for thirty minutes. SEPTEMBER Ms. Hansen and myself met with artists involved with the Children's Festival and decided upon Nigeria as a country which we would represent. I then scheduled three artists to come into the fourth through sixth grades. Faye Hansen, a story- teller worked with our fourth grades, Zinsl Agini, an African dancer worked with our fifth grades and Marsha Wallace, a visual artist, worked with our sixth grades. Other Creative Dramatic Activities: Pre K - Began teaching students a warm up and general ballet movements. Kindergarten - Klndergaren - Creative Movement/Apple Seeds, Trees, Foods. Acted our Mrs. Wlshy Washy. Animal Movement. First Grade - Creative Movement/ Acted our The Barn Dance by learning Square Dance. Second Grade - Creative Movement/Mirroring. Created our own restaurants and used play money and our own menus to order from. OCTOBER Third Grade - Acted out Imaginary Animals\" which students named, drew. invented habitats, foods the animals ate and original movement. October was another month that the Wildwood artists worked with our fourth through sixth grade students. The students went to Wildwood October 22nd and 22rd to perform and help with the craft table. The event was a huge success. Other Creative Dramatic Activities\nPre K - Continued teaching pre-ballet movements. Kindergarten - Creative Movement/Animal Movement. First Grade - Storytelling with Flannel Board/Rainbow Crow. Second Grade - Wrote Halkus and put movement to them. (Recitation and Movement) Third Grade - Acted out The Big Pumpkin and made up skits to reinforce safety at Halloween. Fourth Grade - Performed Anansi at performed at Rightsell Elementary. \"Umojo time for Mitchell students and alsoCOMPLETED THEME IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES ACADEMIC YEAR 1995-1996 2nd Quarter School* Academy of Mary Trulock NOVEMBER Pre - K - Pre-Ballet and First Grades - Storytelling with Flannel Board/ The Girl That Kindergarten Loved Wild Horses and The Dream Catcher Story. Second Grade - The Five Senses in Creative Movement Third Grade - Introduction to Opera Hansel and Gretel Fourth Grade - Fifth Grade - Sixth Grade - Game Show and Yoruba Naming Ceremony Umogo - \"Traveling to the Planets n Introduction to Opera - \"Aida\" Scenework Build Gingerbread House and \"The Regions of the U.S.\" (Info. Plays) DECEMBER (On Maternity Leave) K, 1, 2, Teachers continued work in storytelling and extended day activities 3 - Continued work on Hansel and Gretel 4-6 Continued work on extended day activities Umojo - Sth and 6th graders performed original musical for holiday program! JANUARY Pre- K - Pre Ballet Review and walks, jumps Kindergarten - Began work forUFebruary Program Counting In Swahili and Jafta with First Grade - Acted out The Miller's Sons, a French folktale and the Bear and the Owl moving picture puppets. Second Grade - Painted Imaginary Boxes with four different kinds of music, then drew to the same music/A music interpretation activity. Third Grades - Began work on February Program reciting Shadow with movement and music. Fourth Grades - Recited excerpts from Maya Angelou's Wouldn't Take Nothing for My Journey Now. Fifth Grades - Worked on Conflict Resolution Scenes Sixth Grades - Began studying what it takes to attain their future professions... Went through college guide books to look into different courses, finally put together scenes from the future. Performed for Umojo.COMPLETED THEME IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES ACADEMIC YEAR 1995-1996 3rd Quarter SchoolMitchell Academy of Excelleni^P^^^^^^^, Mary Trulock FEBRUARY Pre- K - Ballet jumps and leaps, practiced warm up and presentation. Kindergarten - Continued work on program. Counting In Swahili with African Clothing and Jafta,with African Clothing as well. (See January_ First Grades - Worked on The Ants and the Grasshoppers with movement and masks for the presentation. Second Grades - Worked on Movement and Science....Dlffernt Forms of Energy. Students were beams of light traveling and electrical currents! Another class worked on a Tribute to Louis Armstrong for presenting. They sang and did movement to\"What a Wonderful World\". Third Grades - After presenting Shadow, they began working on making their own puppets and doing skits about magnets, force and gravity. MARCH Fourth Grades - Presented two skits, one on llarrlet Tubman and one on the Underground Railroad. Presented for Umojo. Fifth Grades - Continued Conflict Resolution Scenes. Sixth Grades - Performed their scenes from the future for Umojo. March - Planning for a short \"Signs of Spring Presentation for grades Pre-K through 3rd March 13th. Students will be presented puppet show, dances with the parachute, storytelling. Fifth Graders will be presenting scenes from Roll of Thunder Hear My Cry and Famous African Americans with a Spiritual Dance for Umojo. APRILVIDEOS AVAILABLE (Documentation of Special Programs) Umojo Programs - 4th through 6th Grades Stubblefield - 4th Grade Tales from the Ashanti, September 95 and Excerpts from Maya Angelou, February 96 Calhoun - 4th Grade Scenes from Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad, February 96 Walker - 5th Grade History Presentation, March 96 James - Sth Grade Scenes from Roll of Thunder Hear My Cry, March 96 Glover - 6th Grade Class Scenes from the Future-Careers, March 96 Whole School Programs African American Heritage Assembly Program, February 96 Girl Scout Inductions, March 96 Concert Pianist, Mr. Patton, March 96 Martin Luther King Speech Contest I Have A Dream\" Kindergarten Performs and Whole School is invited, February 96 February 29, 1996 .d I . -  - Dear Teachers and Parents, il After looking at the attached document, please complete the survey below. Also, feel free to make notes and suggestions on your copy of the document. We are in the third year of our Creative Dramatics' theme and would like your input on reviewing the program. We appreciate your time and efforts. Please return the survey by March 8, 1996. 1) Do you think our theme of Creative Dramatics Is working to provide students with opportunities to work together, become better listeners. and effective speakers? Give examples. Yes, they are learning to speak in front of a group and work together. Yes, our students are learning to perform in many ways, speaking, listening, acting, memorization skills, etc. 2) Do you believe that students are becoming bettef speakers with the use of Creative Dramatics? Be specific. Yes, I believe they are learning to enunciate more clearly and think about what they are saying. Yes, they are learning to articulate and control their tone to project to an audience without a microphone. Yes, I noticed this during your recent salute to African Americans. 3) Are students provided with opportunities to be spontaneous, creative and critical thinkers? Yes. I have noticed in my daughter how she is more outspoken around family and Yes, in theclassroom we words, etc.------------ act out friends. small passages or even pantomime different Of Gst^.. 4) Are students involved in making choices in dramatic situations? Yes. Yes, many times they create their own plays or dances.5) Fourth through sixth grade students only - When taking on the role of a character are students understanding values and beliefs from other cultures and/or other times in history? Yes, we discuss in depth the meanings of the different fables and folktales from around the world. 6) Kindergarten through third grades only - Are students understanding the importance of effective communication through memorizing 'and recitations? I believe they need more practice in these things. //vtcx Finally, parents, are your students Informing you about \"sharing times\" performances here at Mitchell? and Academy of Excellence? Are you receiving the flyers from Mitchell which you have been Invited to attend. Please list the performances or \"sharing timestl (J' Wildwood Park for the Performing Arts 20919 Denny Road Little Rock. AR 72211 USA 1501] 821-PARK (7275) FAX [501] 821-7280 Ann Chotard Founder!Artistic Director October 26, 1995 received Mitchell Elementary Mary Trulock 2410 Battery Little Rock, AR 72206 1 61996 Office of Desegregation w Dear Mary, On behalf of the staff and patrons of Wildwood Park for the Performing Arts, I would like to give you a round of applause for giving so much of your time and talent to the fifth annual Wildwood International Childrens Festival. This year was the best year we have ever had and it is all due to everyones participation and effort. The children had a grand time learning from the various areas as did the adults. We hope that you will join us again in the future. Again, thank you so much for the gift of your time and talents to help make our International Childrens Festival possible. Sincerely, A Ann Chotard Founder/Artistic Director Wildwood Park for the Performing Arts is a non-profit 501 (c) 3 charity registered in IJctle Rock. Arkansas CS?WilJuooJ Park for the forming Arts I''- 1 l\\nnv Ro.tJ . :-il- Ko.k, AK 72211 rECBVED .\u0026lt;'11 ^2l.PARK (72 1AX .501 ^2l-72fie S) 1 6 1996 P I k Ottice oi Mo.u\noring\nAnn \u0026gt; /i.i.irj : tn. .r/A:tsfic /)irAr ''WiiiWbi) August 9, 1995 Ms. Mary Truelock 28410 Kanis Little Rock, AR 72208 Dear Mary, This is in reference to our phone conversation on August 4, 1995. We are so pleased to have your class participate during this year's Wildwood International Children's Festival on October 21st (10am - 4pm) and 22nd (Noon - 5pm), 1995. We will open the gates to the park 30 minutes prior to our \"opening\" times in order for people to set up. At this time 1 have not been able to gather enough information to schedule events in the African Village so I am unsure of your performance time. I should be able to provide you with this information after August 31, 1995. There will be a \"dressing\" area behind the dance stage in the Celebration Tent that is 30 ft wide and approximately 10 ft deep. Please let me know of any other requests by August 31, 1995 so that I can compile all the requests to determine if we can provide everything. Again, we are pleased to have your participation and gratefully acknowledge your gift of time and talent. If you have any questions or require anything else, please do not hesitate to call me at 821-7275 ext. 261. Sincerely, X Ann Spatz Artistic Administrator Park for ,h.- '.rf niu'j .Arts is j n.-n I churtiv .{ inWildxMtoJ Park for ihv Pvrt.rming Arts  Pvitnv R.'.iJ i uk Roa. AR 72 RECEIVED : 'A 1 A\\ s M'ARK 17 11 \u0026gt;21 APR 1 6 1996 [ I Office of Desegregation Monitoring '/b't.jrJ vi'.Xrii'ri.. Dire, f. ,iui \u0026gt; nr .. WiiiMto3 August 9, 1995 Dear Music! Words! Opera! Participant, What an incredible week folks! To begin with I think you should all be commended for having given so much of your time. I am a firm believer in time being the most precious gift a person can give. Many of you requested a conuct base. We are going to start with this \"newsletter.\" As a reminder I need a copy of your Partnership Plans by August 15, 1995. (I have not received any yet.) I will then put them in your next \"newsletter.\" Please be sure to state whether your Partnership Plan is your plan for this year or a dream plan. I am also taking suggestions for a title of our newsletter. The only suggestion so far has been \"Standing O Vations.\" In respect of your time I plan to keep these letters to the point. If you need to call me (and feel free to do so!) my number is (501) 821-PARK(7275) ext. 261. I certainly enjoyed meeting all of you. Take care, ^nh Spatz-rj h Artistic Administrator at Wildwood Park for the Performing Arts P.S. Concerning the International Children's Festival, I have enclosed a separate letter. V'.ikiu nui I\\irk /or t/i. /\\r/ '-ntn':\n.Arts is a n in-/'roht '.'i ' I K:haTiiy I in ArLiirWildwood Park for the Performing Arts Denny Ro.ul l.utU Koa. AR 72211 I SA |\\'1J \u0026lt;1-PARK (72751 PAX 1IJ 821-7280 ' nn t hiitjT.l RECEIVEI^i I APR 1 6 1996 August 10, 1995 Office of Desegregation Monitoring Dear Music! Words! Opera! Participant, We are so pleased to have the participants from your school during this year's Wildwood International Children's Festival on October 21st (10am - 4pm) and 22nd (Noon - 5pm), 1995. We will open the gates to the park 30 minutes prior to our \"opening\" times in order for people to set up. We are trying to lay out the space and time requirements for the Children's Festival. I have only heard from approximately 15% of you as to how you plan to participate, which is creating some difficulty in planning this Festival. Please let me know by August 31, 1995 so that I may ensure that there are adequate provisions made. For those of you who are sending a visual display, we are now setting up a \"gallery\" in the park for that weekend. What you plan to bring will determine where you will be at Wildwood. Visual displays will be in the \"Gallery\n\" African related performances will be in the African Village\nNonAfrican performances will be in the Celebration Tent. Once I receive how you plan to participate, I will send you a letter confirming your performance time or your space provisions (for visual displays). I would like to emphasize that bringing these \"performances from your schools is a learning experience for all of us this year. I don't want you to feel pressured. Please bring whatever you are com.fortable with Performances can be five to thirty minutes. Remember that we are exploring this year to find out what works. Again, we are pleased to have your participation and gratefully acknowledge your gift of time and talent. If you have any questions or require anything else, please do not hesitate to call me at 821-7275 ext. 261. Sincerely, Ann Spatz' J Q Artistic Administrator A ihii ii.ij Park fitr the '.rf lining Arts is a \u0026gt;i -i pm/it .J ntPark ihv Arts I\\nns Ro.id Littk Roa. AR 72:i I i \".A I'Cll sa park (727^' F W p?li sa-7?K' \\nn ( hotafJ f III .:ir/.Aiti\u0026lt;tk' nitCii-'' WiuWi) March 12, 1996 APR 1 6 1996 Mitchell Elementary chool 2410 Battery St. Little Rock, AR 72206 Office of Desegregation Monitoring Dear Mary: vie are looking forward to our time with you and your student .s and  want to take this opportunity to reconfirm the particulars of our visit : Performance date(s) and time(s): May 2, 1996 12:45 P.M. 1:45 P.M. Total cost: $000.00 Amount received: 000.00 Balance due: $000.00 Our performing artists will need access to the performance space approximately one hour prior to the performance. Also, we vzould appreciate having four or five students available to help our cast load-in and out, before and after the performance. Enclosed is (are) one (1) study guide. Please\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_44","title":"Rankings of Arkansas School Districts on Selected Items","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["1992-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Educational statistics","Public schools","Pulaski County (Ark.)--History--20th century"],"dcterms_title":["Rankings of Arkansas School Districts on Selected Items"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/44"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nRANKINGS OF ARKANSAS SCHOOL DISTRICTS ON SELECTED ITEMS DEPARTME T OF EDUCATION LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS JANUARY 1992 C IVE At'kansas sEP 1 3 1993 DEPARTMENTOF EDUC~Tf~NMonitoring 4 STATE CAPITOL MALL  LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-1071  (501) 682-4475 BURTON L. ELLIOTT, Director, General Education Division January 1992 MEMOT O: The Governor of Arkansas, Members of the General Assembly, and Superintendents of Public Schools FROM: Burton L. Elliott, Director, General Education Division SUBJECT: Rankings of the School Districts on Selected Items Contained herein are the names of the school districts of Arkansas ranked on the basis of twelve (12) selected items contained in the Annual Statistical Report of the Public Schools (Report on the House Concurrent Resolution No. 58 of 1961) dated January, 1992. These figures do not include expenditures of restricted federal funds as ECIA or personnel paid with federal funds. Data for 1990-91 are actual\ndata for 1991-92 are estimates. The school districts are listed in LEA number order beginning on page 3 for easy reference. This should permit the reader to quickly locate an individual district on any table. Definitions of items included are listed below: 1. Expense Per ADA. The current expense, less the amount received from the other districts for tuition, divided by the resident ADA. Kindergarten and Pre-Kindergarten pupils and expenditures included in this figure. The 1990-91 ADA were used in computing the expense for both years. 2. Average Daily Attendance. The ADA is total days of attendance divided by days taught. This number includes those who attend school outside the district on a tuition agreement between the respective districts. This is the annual average. 3. Average Daily Membership. The total days of attendance and absence divided by the number of days taught. This number includes those who attend outside the district on a tuition agreement between the respective districts. This is the annual average. The average for the first three (3) quarters is used for MFPA and transportation aid purposes. 4. Number of Teachers K-12. Includes all certificated personnel except superintendents, principals, supervisors, assistant superintendents, and those paid with federal funds. 5. Average Salary of Teachers K-12. The average salary of personnel as defined in item 4 above. 6. Number of Certificated Personnel. The number of personnel as defined in item 4 above plus superintendents, principals, supervisors, and assistant superintendents. Personnel paid with federal funds are not included. 7. Average Salary of Certificated Personnel. The average salary of the personnel as defined in item 6 above. The data contained herein should be of interest to persons desiring to compare the statistics of one district with those of another. For additional information call or write the Office of Local Fiscal Services, Division of the Department of Finance and Administration, #4 Capitol Hall, Room 202-A, Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1071. Telephone: (501) 682-4259. Printing of this publication has been made possible by the United States Department of Education in conjunction with the National Center for Education Statistics {NCES), P.L. 100-297. The information represented or reported herein was printed pursuant to a _grant from the United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare. However, the opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the United States Office of Education, and no official endorsement by the United States Office of Education should be inferred. In keeping with the guidelines on Title VI, Section 601, Civil Rights Act of 1964\nTitle IX, Section 901, Educational Amendments of 1972\nand Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Arkansas Department of Education assures that no person in the United States shall on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex or handicap be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. An Equal Opportunity Employer Page 2 CONSOLIDATIONS AND ANNEXATIONS Effective July 1, 1~91, the following districts were consolidated or annexed: 1. Griffithville, Judsonia and Kensett consolidated to become the Riverview School District (White County). 2. Enola consolidated with Mount Vernon to become the Mount Vernon/Enola School District (Faulkner Countyj. ' LEA t 01-01 01-02 Qi__-04 01-05 02-01 02-02 02-03 02-04 03-02 03-03 03-04 03-06 04-01 04-02 04-03 04-04 04-05 04-06 04-07 05-01 05-02 05-03 o:s-01 05-05 05-06 06-01 06-02 07-01 08-01 08-02 08-03 09-01 09-02 09-03 10-01 10-02 10-03 11-01 11-04 11-06 12-0i 12-02 12-03 12-04 12-05 13-01 13-03 COUNTY ARKANSAS ARKANSAS ARKANSAS ARKANSAS ASHLEY ASHLEY ASHLEY ASHLEY BAXTER BAXTER BAXTER BAXTER BENTON BENTON BENTON BENTON BENTON BENTON BENTON BOONE BOONE BOONE BOONE BOONE BOONE BRADLEY BRADLEY CALHOUN CARROLL CARROLL CARROLL CHICOT CHICOT CHICOT CLARK CLARK CLARK CLAY CLAY CLAY CLEBURNE CLEBURNE CLEBURNE CLEBURNE CLEBURNE CLEVELAND CLEVELAND ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS ANNUAL FISCAL REPORT ANALYSIS DISTRICT RANK DEWITT GILLETT STUTTGART HUMPHREY CROSSETT FOUNTAIN HILL HAMBURG PARKDALE COTTER MOUNTAIN HOME NORFORK TRI-COUNTY CON. BENTONVILLE DECATUR GENTRY GRAVETTE ROGERS SILOAM SPRINGS PEA RIDGE ALPENA BERGMAN HARRISON OMAHA VALLEY SPRINGS LEAD HILL HERMITAGE WARREN HAMPTON BERRYVILLE EUREKA SPRINGS GREEN FOREST DERMOTT EUDORA LAKESIDE AMITY ARKADELPHIA GURDON CORNING PIGGOTT CLAY COUNTY CENTR CONCORD HEBER SPRINGS QUITMAN WEST SIDE WILBURN KINGSLAND RISON 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 EXPENSE PER ADA 90-91 91-92 1 2 LEA ORDER 1990-91 A/D/A A/D/M 3 4 ~18 ~09 1,317 1,378 3.174 3,705 278 288 2_, 481 2,796 2,304 2,437 ~771 3~287 306 322 2.593 2.916 2.666 2,788 2,965 3,567 244 265 2,729 _,_984 l,_630 ~4 3,169 3,231 145 152 2,906 3,148 502 530 2,643 3,083 3,268 3,451 2,483 2,895 451 472 4,809 4,762 151 159 2,487 2,909 3,987 4,171 2,970 3,405 474 499 2,548 2,977 969 1,018 2,622 2,947 985 1,033 2,634 2,998 6,179 6,511 2,553 2,659 2,686 2,559 2,338 3,168 2,494 3L202 2,568 2,477 2,654 2,231 2,430 2,430 2,502 2,867 2,617 2,B47 2,614 2,574 2,465 2,413 2,697 2,696 2,480 2,608 2,635 3,041 2,708 2,366 2,989 3__1, 53 3. 100 3,029 2,673 3,633 2L892 3,529 2,972 2,809 3,099 2,610 2,756 2,769 2,780 3,012 2,973 3,196 3,022 2,921 2,900 2,896 2,968 3,197 2,944 2,903 3,129 3,911 3,076 2,886 2,149 679 461 665 2,504 282 770 329 589 1,733 879 1,331 595 1,071 1,123 925 1,216 280 2,181 881 1,187 905 748 483 1,300 562 426 164 394 663 2,273 720 482 694 2,618 298 805 347 624 1,818 910 1,393 625 1,126 1,193 966 1,310 293 2,267 921 1 1250 953 782 515 1,382 594 448 177 411 689 NUMBEORF TEACHERS K-12 90-91 91-92 5 6 PAGE N0_~~3~- AVG. SLRY. NO. OF CERT. AVG. SLRY. TCHRS. K-12 PERSONNE=L==-=---C=E=R~T~~P~E=R~S=-=,=------ 90-91 91-9~2~_9~0~-~91 91-92 90-91 91-92 7 8 9 10 --1=--c-1'---\"'---'--c'1=2-'--='------ 92.7 94.7 23,157 26,141 98.9 101.1 24,016 27,140 23.6 24.6 20,081 21,921 26.5 27.5 21,637 23,436 152.2 149.9 22,802 27,051 162.1 ~1~5=9~-~8=--2=3=--'-,7=2~8_=_-_- ~2~7~ ,~9~8~8 23.2 23.2 22 369 27,520 25.2 --,-=2~5~=2=-----'2~3~,~3=2=9=---'2=8=--'-,4~8=7-'------ 185.7 187.2 23,635 27,543 197.7 199.6 24,373 28,510 21.3 21.3 20,106 25,0~00~_~2=3='-~3=--_~2=3=--=-.3=-~2~1~,~7~0~3~2=6~,~86=3'----- 109.5 110.0 21,956 25,346 11~7~-~2'--~1~1~7~-~3=--2~3=',~2='3='4_~_2_= 6\"'--_'- ,6=0-=--=4 14.7 12.8 17,735 20,021 16.7 14.8 17,592 19,567 38.6 38.8 21,655 23,710 41.6 4_~1~~8=-'2=2=',~8~4~4-'--_-2 =5=--_'- -'=10-=--c-1 194.9 199.8 24,400 28,162 210.4 216.4 25,607 29,310 31.3 35.o 20 1 100 22 1 20~4.3 =3=0~.~oc---'2=1~,5=1~7-'--2=3-'c--'--,4=9~4---- 18.3 13.8 20,313 23,402 20.3 ~1=6==3'--=2~1~~3=7=8=--_2_~ 5=_~ 0~5~2::_ 260.3 261.8 22,592 26,723 274.8 282.3 23,719 28,087 44.0 43.3 19,333 21,625 47.0 46.3 20,269 22,654 72.0 72.7 20,387 23,000 76.0 76.7 21,078 23,844 68.0 69.3 22,275 24,946 72.0 75.8 23,037 25,910 358.5 375.3 26,969 30,889 386.6 403.4 28,108 32,060 133.5 137.o 24,071 20,077 144.5 1~4=0~~0~2=s~,2=7~3_2=9_~_,35 -~=o_ 51.1 ~2.5 20,828 24,170 54.2 55.5 21,783 25,149 30.7 31.6 22,765 25,947 33.7 34.6 23,985 27,353 42.2 46.1 23,322 26,319 45.3 49.2 24,596 27,627 152.4 154.3 22,991 26,373 163.3 165.2 23,976 27,642 23.5 24.5 21,440 23,723 26.1 27.1 22,720 25,302 50.5 50.5 23,320 27,812 54.5 54.5 24,117 28,609 27.5 27.8 19,972 23,130 30.3 30.6 21,469 24,467 40.0 41.0 21,319 23,910 43.0 44.0 22,304 24,951 114.6 116.5 23,100 25,869 124.5 126.5 24,570 27,468 58.8 60.2 23,248 27,539 62.3 63.7 24,437 28,466 84.0 88.0 21,773 25,257 88.0 92.0 22,371 25,847 40.8 41.S 21,305 24,147 43.8 44.5 22,463 25,477 71.3 72.5 21,586 24,559 77.0 78.5 22,420 25,469 74.3 73.0 24,145 26,991 79.3 78.0 25,129 28,122 66.5 59.8 21,804 25,099 72.6 64.9 23,193 26,462 B6.3 86.0 20,759 23,497 92.3 92.0 21,660 24,566 21.7 21.2 20,790 24,156 23-.-8--23.3 21,967 25,331 145.9 148.9 22,384 26,027 155.8 159.3 23,404 2~7~~1_-2_~_2 _ 65.5 64.5 20,832 24,557 69.5 68.5 21,680 25,556 82.5 80.9 21,926 26,340 88.0 B6.4 22,844 2~7~,3~4~0---- 65.0 68.2 20,335 23,052 69.0 73.2 21,113 23,894 ---- 54.7 54.7 21,391 23,965 57.7 57.7 22,211 24,796 34.0 33.3 21 1 B24 26,690 37.0 36.3 23,141 27,726 89.5 91.S 22,139 26,271 94.9 97.2 22,990 2_7~~2~1~ 0 _ 39.5 38.2 22,919 26,206 42.5 41.2 23,841 27,049 31.7 32.S 20,652 25,688 34.7 35.5 21,592 26,620 14.2 15.4 18,682 22,473 16.2 17.4 21,181 25,723 26.8 26.6 19,836 23,259 29.8 29.4 20,738 24,406 44.8 44.7 22,378 27,958 47.8 47.7 23,383 29,055 ---- LEA COUNTY 13-04 CLEVELAND 14-01 COLUMBIA 14-02 COLUMBIA 14-03 COLUMBIA 14-04 COLUMBIA 14-06 COLUMBIA 14-07 COLUMBIA 15-03 CONWAY 15-05 CONWAY 15-07 CONWAY 16-01 CRAIGHEAD 16-02 CRAIGHEAD 16-03 CRAIGHEAD 16-05 CRAIGHEAD 16-08 CRAIGHEAD 16-ii CRAIGHEAD 16-12 CRAIGHEAD 16-13 CRAIGHEAD 17-01 CRAWFORD 17-02 CRAWFORD 17-03 CRAWFORD 17-04 CRAWFORD 17-05 CRAWFORD 18-01 CRITTENDEN 18-02 CRITTENDEN 18-03 CRITTENDEN 18-04 CRITTENDEN 18-05 CRITTENDEN 19-01 CROSS 19-03 CROSS 19-05 CROSS 20-01 DALLAS 20-02 DALLAS 20-03 DALLAS 21-01 DESHA 21-02 DESHA 21-03 DESHA 21-04 DESHA 21-05 DESHA 22-02 DREW 22-03 DREW 23-01 FAULKNER 23-02 FAULKNER 23-03 FAULKNER 23-04 FAULKNER 23-05 FAULKNER 23-06 FAULKNER ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS ANNUAL FISCAL REPORT ANALYSIS DISTRICT RANK WOODLAWN 48 EMERSON 49 MAGNOLIA 50 MCNEIL 51 TAYLOR 52 WALDO 53 WALKER 54 NEMO VISTA 55 WONDERVIEW 56 SO. CONWAY CO. 57 BAY-BROWN 58 WEST SIDE 59 BROOKLAND 60 BUFFALO ISLAND CE 61 JONESBORO 62 NETTLETON 63 VALLEY VIEW 64 RIVERSIDE 65 ALMA 66 CEDARVILLE 67 MOUNTAINBURG 68 MULBERRY 69 VAN BUREN 70 CRAWFORDSVILLE 71 EARLE 72 WEST MEMPHIS 73 MARION 74 TURRELL 75 CROSS COUNTY 76 PARKIN 77 WYNNE 78 CARTHAGE 79 FORDYCE 80 SPARKMAN 81 ARKANSAS CITY 82 DELTA SPECIAL 83 DESHA-DREW 84 DUMAS 85 MCGEHEE 86 DREW CENTRAL 87 MONTICELLO 88 CONWAY 89 ENOLA 90 GREENBRIER 91 GUY-PERKINS 92 MAYFLOWER 93 MOUNT VERNON/ENOL 94 EXPENSE PER ADA 90-91 91-92 1 2 2~39 2,803 3,554 2J326 2..,834~4 2,912 3,141 2J669 2,948 2,669 2,678 2,610 2,683 2~477 2._438 2,685 2,685 2,572 2,-424 2,873 2,375 2,591 2,676 2,645 2,424 2,805 3,104 2,590 2,493 2,957 2,825 2,736 2,525 3,483 3,087 2,888 6,165 2,974 3. 126 2,439 2,357 2,611 2,478 2,505 3,529 2,344 3,198 2,356 2,844 :L_ii4 3_,_229 3,091 2,980 3,113 3.073 ~839 2_,_847 3.025 3,007 2,909 2.946 3,028 2,764 2,906 3. 105 3,068 2,831 3,195 2,811 2,941 2,950 3,231 3,135 3,509 2,875 3,725 3,474 3,031 6,609 3,165 3,420 2,818 2,619 2,950 2,882 3,019 2,902 3,459 2,883 3,106 LEA ORDER_ __ _ PAGE NO. 4 1990-91 NUMBER Of AVG, SLRY. NO. Of CERT. AVG, SLRY. ---~TEACHERS_K-12____LCHRS. K-12~-~P~E~R=S=ON=N=E=L~_~C=ER~T~~P~ER~S==----A/ D/A A/D/M 90-91 __ 91-92__'!'9-91~~9~1~-~9~2~~9~0-~9~1~-9~1=--92~_~9=0_-~9=1-=9=1_-=9=2~--- 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 402 _4~1~7~_ 30._5 __ 29.9 19 931 22 201 33.6 33.0 21 164 23 629 341 354 30,6 27.1 23.895 26.812 33.6 30.1 25.319 28,474 967-\"3\"---\"\"13=0~_175.9 174.5 24,035 28,255 189.0 186.6 25 024 29 245 332 3~ 25.6 __ 26.1 18,335 20 566 28.6 29.1 19 594 21 :573 328 341 26.0 26.0 21.169 23.497 29.0 29.0 22.615 25.088 532 569 39.9 41.1 ~170 24 450 42.8 44.1 22 602 25 712 235 242 21.5 20.7 18.985 21,790 24.0 23.2 20 496 23 078 380 399 29.0 31,020.393 22,671 32.0 34,021,360 22.970 419 437 30.1 __ 30.1 1~889 23,297 33.1 33.1 21 173 24 324 2L451 21_595 153.0 155.0 23,250 28,587 165.8 167.8 24 263 29 621 619 648 42.7 42.7 21,575 25,787 45.7 45.7 22.513 26.912 1,229 1._310 81.8 82.1 ~231 24.726 89.8 90.1 22,227 25,797 842 885 :54.0 54.0 2~833 27,336 57.0 57.0 23 763 28 354 784 814 59.0 59.0 21,348 24,708 63.8 63.8 22.079 25.468 4,523 4..,770 309.4 301.4 25,478 29 486 329.3 320.4 26 346 30 350 1,539 1,638 102.5 110.1 22,004 24.966 __ 1=1=1==.3,,___=1=1=8=9=653_ 22 5 949 960 998 58.5 63.5 24,915 27,971 62.5 67.5 25,660 28,714 786 020 59.0 56.0~364 23,937~.o 60.0 22 383 25 126 2,186 2,288 137.5 140.5 23_,_431 27 669 146.8 149.8 24,749 29,088 708 760 50.7 :50.4 23,371 26,507 53.7 53.4 24.312 27,503 759 013 53.o 54.0 23L099 26,583 __:u.o ~o 23 966 27 267 415 439 33.1 33.2 21._716 2~26 36.4 36.5 22,793 26,146 4,310 4,620 266.5 275.5 24,929 28.772 283.0 292.0 25.926 29,819 532 559 38.9 39.4 19,823 22,402 42.5 43.0 20 999 23 6=9~6_,,__ _ 937 982 69.0 65.0 23,968 26,910 73.2 69.2 24 955 27 781 5,514 5,866 385.5 378.6 24.695 28,220 412.4 405.6 25.597 28,879 2,317 2,469 143.0 145.0 24,102 2!\n!_,037 154.8 156.8 25 111 29,200 496 524 34.8 33.7 21,691 25,393 38.1 36.7 23,150 26 894 820 857 60.7 60.0 20,372 23,814 65.8 65.2 21,367 24,893 554 :591 42.0 42.3 20,121 23,897 45.0 45.3 21 520 25 407 2,728 2,860 183.5 180.8 23,808 27,357 195.1 192.4 24,802 28 442 165 172 17.5 17.5 19,528 21,383 19.5 19.5 20,894 22,722 1,249 1,303 88.7 88.0 22,429 25,216 95.7 94.0 23,368 26 245 345 362 28.5 26.1 19,954 23,089 30.5 28.1 21 392 24 850 145 152 18.2 17.0 22.727 23,780 20.7 19.5 25,110 26.262 324 341 27.1 26.6 19,060 21,556 30.1 29.6 20,755 23L0~4~8\"-- 182 190 11.3 10.8 18,583 21,402 13.3 12.8 21_,094 2.1_,3:.9,_4_._., _ 2,259 2,381 133.0 137.5 25,061 28,513 143.5 148.0 26,197 29,752 1,227 1,276 79.5 81.0 22,334 25,180 84.5 86.0 23,200 26,226 1,023 1,064 70.2 70.2 22,361 25,736 74.7 ~23 487 26,9~ 2,096 2,183 138.1 138.4 22,363 26,295 150.1 150.3 23,590 27,577 5,479 5,734 341.0 353.3 25,116 28,704 366.5 384.5 26,175 29,8~4=1~-- 121 126 13.1 17,962 14.6 -~-~---~- 19,~5=2=0\"--~-~- 1,505 1 1 586 87.S 99.0 24 1 801 27 1 934 93.5 104.5 25,713 28 1 921 272 283 23.0 23.5 20,696 23,355 25.0 25.5 21,847 24.~ 667 701 44.5 47.0 21,680 25,128 47.5 50.0 22,604 26.~0~5~6 232 242 19.6 28.5 19,134 21,461 21.6 31.5 20,027 22,230 ' LEA t COUNTY 23-07 FAULKNER 24-01 24-02 24-03 2'4-04 24-05 25-01 25-02 25-03 26-01 26-02 26-03 26-04 26-0:5 26-06 26-07 27-03 27-04 27-05 28-01 28-03 28-06 28-07 28-08 29-01 29-03 29-05 29-06 30-01 30-02 30-03 30-04 30-05 31-02 31-04 31-05 31-06 32-01 32-02 32-03 32-06 32-09 32-10 32-11 33-01 33-02 33-03 FRANKLIN FRANKLIN FRANKLIN FRANKLIN FRANKLIN FULTON FULTON FULTON GARLAND GARLAND GARLAND GARLAND GARLAND GARLAND GARLAND GRANT GRANT GRANT GREENE GREENE GREENE GREENE GREENE HEMPSTEAD HEMPSTEAD HEMPSTEAD HEMPSTEAD HOT SPRING HOT SPRING HOT SPRING HOT SPRING HOT SPRING HOWARD HOWARD HOWARD HOWARD INDEPENDENCE INDEPENDENCE INDEPENDENCE INDEPENDENCE INDEPENDENCE INDEPENDENCE INDEPENDENCE IZARD IZARD IZARD ARKANSAPSU BLIC SCHOOLD ISTRICTS ANNUAFLI SCAL REPORTA NALYSIS LEA ORDER PAGE NO. 5 DISTRICT RANK VILONIA 95 ALTUS-DENNING 96 CHARLESTON 97 COUNTY LINE 98 OZARK 99 PLEASANT VIEW 100 MAMMOTHS PRING 101 SALEM 102 VIOLA 103 CUTTER-MORNING ST104 FOUNTAIN LAKE 105 HOT SPRINGS 106 JESSIEVILLE 107 LAKE HAMILTON 108 LAKESIDE 109 MOUNTAIN PINE 110 POYEN 111 PRATTSVILLE 112 SHERIDAN 113 DELAPLAINE 114 MARMADUKE 115 STANFORD 116 GREENE COUNTY TECi17 NORTHEAST ARKANSA118 BLEVINS 119 HOPE 120 SARATOGA 121 SPRING HILL 122 BISHARCK 123 GLEN ROSE 124 MAGNET COVE 125 MALVERN 126 OUACHITA 127 DIERKS 128 MINERAL SPRINGS 129 NASHVILLE 130 UMPIRE 131 BATESVILLE 132 CORD-CHARLOTTE 133 CUSHMAN 134 NEWARK 135 SOUTH SIDE 136 SULPHUR ROCK 137 MIDLAND 138 CALICO ROCK 139 MELBOURNE 140 MOUNT PLEASANT 141 EXPENSE PER ADA 90-91 91-92 1 2 2 455 :L_Q29 2.839 2.970 2_,560 2_,969 2_,_fil0~6 2,499 2,874 3_,528 3. 790 2,_888 3,222 2,628 2,937 2L711 3,047 2,801 2,997 3,072 3,309 3,307 3,430 3,454 3,321 2,461 2,863 2,572 2,901 2,678 2,979 3,036 3,753 3,011 3,407 2,523 2,939 3,052 3,501 2,488 2,767 3,357 3,548 2,403 2,834 2,692 2.L888 2.481 2,850 2,651 2,427 2 539 3,014 2,360 2,849 2,492 2,663 2,514 4,781 2,672 2,892 3,235 5.384 2,586 2,925 2.697 2,657 2,513 3,213 3,005 3...J.52 2,811 3 445 3,133 3,006 2 988 3,172 2,728 3,195 2,866 2,955 2,943 5,471 2.932 3,381 3,814 5,823 3,002 3,1-40 3,003 3,291 2,911 3,518 1990-91 A/D/A A/D/M 3 4 1___,_542 304 678 555 1,322 227 428 641 398 483 853 3,116 566 2,901 2,081 583 242 257 3,261 270 629 194 2,123 2,226 449 2,978 340 294 778 824 553 2,578 369 573 476 1,690 123 2,335 249 271 711 1,039 280 582 435 472 265 1__,_614 323 702 588 1,400 240 451 672 415 514 899 3,364 593 3,047 2,188 622 250 268 3,459 285 658 201 2,223 2,369 468 3. 133 354 307 812 864 582 2,690 381 596 496 1,771 127 2,458 259 286 742 1,103 294 618 457 490 274 NUMBER OF TEACHERS K-12 90-91 91-92 5 6 AVG. SLRY. TCHRS. K-12 90-91 91-92 7 8 NO. OF CERT. PERSONNEL 90-91 91-92 9 10 AVG. CERT. 90-91 11 SLRY. PERS. 91-92 12 97.0 101.0 23,538 27,980 104.0 109.0 24,352 28,878 26.6 23.4 19.555 22,617 28.6 25.4 20,752 24,089 47.0 49.0 22,853 25,850 50.0 52.0 23,825 26,923 44.3 40.7 19,945 24,416 47.3 43.7 20,761~9 85.5 87.5 22,725 25,873 91.9 93.8 23,698 26,926 22.0 22.5 18,844 20,650 24.0 24.5 20,113 22,059 33.8 34.S 22,569 25,325 36.3 37.0 23,751 26,288 47.8 48.8 20,407 23,401 50.8 51.8 21,416 24,434 29.5 30.0 21,778 24,765 31.5 32.0 22,917 25,992 36.2 33.7 22,585 26,780 39.2 36.7 23,777 27,874 62.S 62.5 24,393 27 1 180 67.0 67.0 25,672 28,428 239.2 232.8 24,490 27,350 255.2 248.3 25,599 28,802 41.7 41.7 27,093 27,444 44.7 45.7 28,196 27,99~~9 ___ _ 164.5 170.0 25,173 29,156 177.5 183.0 26,269 30,458 126.9 129.0 24,051 27,798 136.9 139.0 24,950 28,866 43.5 43.5 21,482 25,103 46.5 46.5 22,679 26,242 18.0 19.0 22,841 26,009 20.0 21.0 24,385 27,592 17.0 17.0 25,864 28,709 19.0 19.0 27,408~3~0~~3=7~_8_ _ _ 205.8 212.1 23,683 27,554 219.4 225.7 24,622 28,534 21.4 23.2 21,828 24,835 24.1 25.4 22,888 25,892 40.6 40.6 23,344 27,541 43.6 43.6 24,381 28,290 20.1 20.5 19,263 20,816 22.4 22.8 20,131 21,694 131.4 133.3 23,179 27,566 140.1 142.1 24,030 28,558 152.5 151.4 23,495 27,217 162.7 162.6 24,277 28,050 31.5 32.6 23,203 25,593 34.5 35.6 24,180 26,545 178.5 181.5 24,433 28,48!5 190.5 193.5 25,485 29,512 25.6 27.8 17,651 20,728 28.1 30.3 19,005 22,269 22.0 22.0 19,606 24,774 25.0 25.0 20,921 26,217 48.3 52.0 23,170 27,850 51.3 55.0 24,117 28,803 53.6 54.0 23,866 27,882 56.6 58.0 24,795 28,992 43.9 42.0 21,175 23,619 46.9 45.0 22,112 24,778 174.5 174.5 22,021 25,604 183.0 183.0 22,732 26,362 29.4 29.4 19,283 21,985 32.3 32.3 20,678~2=.3.,...,_,,2=1=0~---- 39.2 40.2 21,712 26,08_1 __ 4_2_._2~ 43.2 22,765 26,821 37.2 37.0 20,904 23,595 40.7 40.7 22,250 25,104 109.2 110.2 23,172 26,948 116.5 117.6 24,028 27,762 ___ _ 14.9 15.6 20,349 22,369 17.8 18.5 22,124 24,559 157.0 158.5 25,114 27,967 168.3 169.8 25,851 28,778 19.7 20.6 21,662 24,815 21.7 22.6 23,106~2~6~~2~2~3,-__ _ 22.9 24.8 21,442 24,645 25.4 27.3 22,633 25,939 70.0 70.1 28,616 28,774 75.3--75.4 29,495 29,644 69.7 73.0 22,643 26,433 76.0 80.0 23,544 27,356 24.3 23.4 20,340 23,265 26.3 25.4 21,519 24,554 44~45.2 21,141 24,131 47.4 48.2 22,099 25,254 34.1 36.6 20,404 23,314 37.1 39.6 21,508 24,523~--- 35.0 35.3 20,890 23,838 38.0 38.3 22,093 25,078 24.6 24.5 22,182 24,694 26.6 26.5 21,885 24,298 LEA~ COUNTY 33-06 IZARD 34-02 JACKSON 34-03 JACKSON 34-04 JACKSON 34-05 JACKSON 35-01 JEFFERSON 35-02 JEFFERSON 35-05 JEFFERSON 35-08 JEFFERSON 35-09 JEFFERSON 35-10 JEFFERSON 36-01 JOHNSON 36-04 JOHNSON 36-05 JOHNSON 36-06 JOHNSON 37-01 LAFAYETTE 37-02 LAFAYETTE 37-03 LAFAYETTE 38-01 LAWRENCE 38-04 LAWRENCE 38-05 LAWRENCE 38-06 LAWRENCE 38-07 LAWRENCE 38-08 LAWRENCE 39-04 LEE 40-01 LINCOLN 40-02 LINCOLN 40-03 LINCOLN 41-01 LITTLE RIVER 41-02 LITTLE RIVER 41-03 LITTLE RIVER 42-01 LOGAN 42-02 LOGAN 42-03 LOGAN 42-04 LOGAN 43-01 LONOKE 43-02 LONOKE 43-03 LONOKE 43-04 LONOKE 43-05 LONOKE 44-01 MADISON 44-02 MADISON 44-03 MADISON 45-01 MARION 45-02 MARION 45-03 MARION 46-01 MILLER ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS ANNUAL FISCAL REPORT ANALYSIS LEA ORDER PAGE NO. 6_ DISTRICT RANK IZARD CO CONSOL 142 GRUBBS 143 NEWPORT 144 SWIFTON 145 TUCKERMAN 146 ALTHEIMER-SHERRIL147 DOLLARWAY 148 PINE BLUFF 149 WABBASEKA-TUCKER 150 WATSON CHAPEL 151 WHITE HALL 152 CLARKSVILLE 153 LAMAR 154 DARK 155 WEST SIDE 156 BRADLEY 157 LEWISVILLE 158 STAMPS 159 BLACK ROCK 160 HOXIE 161 LYNN 162 SLOAN-HENDRIX 163 STRAWBERRY 164 WALNUT RIDGE 165 MARIANNA 166 GOULD 167 GRADY 168 STAR CITY 169 ASHDOWN 170 FOREMAN 171 WINTHROP 172 BOONEVILLE 173 MAGAZINE 174 PARIS 175 SCRANTON 176 LONOKE 177 ENGLAND 178 CARLISLE 179 CABOT 180 HUMNOKE 181 HUNTSVILLE 182 KINGSTON 183 SAINT PAUL 184 FLIPPIN 185 YELLVILLE-SUMMIT 186 MARION CO 187 BRIGHT STAR 188 EXPENSE PER ADA 90-91 91-92 1 2,~16 3,306 2,532 3,474 2,617 2,847 2,773 2,974 2,931 2,637 2,699 2,363 2,377 4,027 2,615 2,920 2,970 2,611 2,542 2,446 3,281 3,024 3,432 2,473 2,975 2,571 2,687 2,511 2,580 2,988 3,675 2,499 2,835 2,638 2,742 2,390 2,559 2,668 2,235 3,647 2,493 2,950 2,846 2,691 2,736 3,100 2,952 2 3,129 3.673 2,922 3,563 2,951 3,139 3,021 3,233 3,420 3,034 2,865 2,750 2,819 4,242 2,931 3,323 3,184 2,887 2,914 2,899 3,810 3,287 3,885 2,871 3,130 2,980 3,435 2,896 2,901 3,142 3,738 2,901 3,1:52 2,817 2,854 2,814 2,842 2,961 2,759 3,727 2,908 3,353 3,198 3,103 3,017 3,222 3,529 1990-91 A/D/A A/D/M 3 4 :520 188 2,149 181\n518 549 1,892 7,116 265 3,327 2,724 1,490 978 150 622 440 579 847 378 914 228 478 216 852 2,602 323 324 1,450 2,068 569 169 1,256 441 1,192 391 1,661 1,016 669 4,542 169 1,566 286 321 741 791 286 248 :553 200 2,252 191 547 581 1,989 7,518 282 3,479 2,884 1,560 1,028 158 657 469 612 875 395 967 237 500 224 899 2,773 341 335 1,506 2,173 590 176 1,328 467 1,260 403 1,740 1,068 696 4,832 180 1,666 300 337 781 832 303 259 NUMBER OF TEACHERS K-12 90-91 91-92 AYCi, SLRY. TCHRS. K-12 90-91 91-92 NO, OF CERT. PERSONNEL 90-91 91-92 Aye\n. CERT. 90-91 11 SLRY. PERS. 91-92 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 37.6 19.3 134.2 20.1 37.6 39.4 132.0 459.3 21.0 209.6 179.0 97.5 63.7 16.9 44.4 37.5 43.3 58.3 30.5 60.5 20.0 37.9 21.2 62.0 183.5 25.8 21.8 91.9 133.0 43.6 14.6 73.9 33.5 82.0 28.4 104.9 71.5 48.2 264.5 15.8 104.6 21.0 25.3 48.0 55.0 22.7 17.0 41.2 20L88:5 2-'l,402 40.6 44.2 2.!_,812 2~4 19,317.374 20,410 21.3 21.3 18,485 21.324 132.0 25,_114 29__,_489 142. 7 140.5 25-.,935 30~98 19.6 18~578 20--L946 22.1 21.6 20_,J)19 2~23 38.6 19,807 22.708 40,6 41,620.979 23,839 40.4 19,907 22,626 42.4 __ 43.4 20__,_893 2~55 130.0 23,238 2~360 141.5 140.3 24,196 27,241 459.0 26,811 29,916 491,0 491,527,755 30,847 20.0 18J326 22J969 24.0 23.0 19__,_553 2'l,__\nl99 211.6 26,185 29,567 225.6 227.6 27,328 30__,_TI3 177.0 24,662 27,786 191.0 189.0 25,507 28,619 102.0 22,571 25,660 102.:5 107.0 23,479 26 759 65.7 21,607 24,753 67.4 69.5 22,351 25,564 17.9 19,417 21,674 18.9 19.9 20,721 23,160 45.9 22,259 24,808 47.4 48~3,073 25 595 37.5 20,120 22,799 40.5 40.5 21,422 24..,__!32 40.3 22,519 26,079 46.8 43.8 23,713 27,300 58.7 21,915 24,938 61.7 62.2 22L802 25,858 30.0 20,628 23,358 33.5 33.0 21,726 24,607 59.9 22,618 27,508 64.8 64.4 23.505 28.858 20.9 20,890 23,520 22.2 23.4 21,718 24~8 37.9 23,187 25,777 40.9 __ 40.9 24.489 26_,_fil!9 21.0 20,052 21,645 23.2 23,421,372 23,288 61.1 20,867 25L353 66.0 65.1 21,649 2~49 183.5 23,103 25,458 200.0__2QQ.O 24,252 2~867 26.0 18.021 20,888 28.8 29.0 19,044 22,017 22.7 18,717 24,072 24.8 24.7 19L736 25,212 92.3 22,897 26,320 100.6___!Q_2.\u0026lt;l_24 005 27.384 136.3 23.207 25.828 144.5 147.5 24,229 26.814 42.6 21,414 24L109 46.6 __ 45.6 22,450 25,103 14.6 20,966 23,019 16.6 __ 16.6 22,339 24 477 75.6 24,567 29,031 80.4 81.1 25,796 30,124 34.5 21,487 24,342 36.5 37.5 22,379 25,259 82.2 23,725 26,602 87.9 88.1 24,571 27,499 27.4 22,362 25,034 30.7 29.7 23,990 26,709 107.4 22,918 26,479 1u...,_1 114.1 23,782 27,580 71.0 22,834 25,794 76.5 76.0 23,881 26,957 47.7 22,134 25,011 51.1 50.7 23,184 26,163 285.0 24,371 28,136 281.0 302.0 25,307 29,048 17.1 18,729 19,880 17.8 19.1 19,963 21,_Q_24 105.9 22,473 27,092109.6 110.9 23,110 27,761 21.0 21,498 25,643 23.0 23.0 23,025 27,229 26.3 20,710 23,396 27.5 28.5 21,764 24,394 49.0 24,145 28,048 51.0 52.3 25,200 29,180 57.6 21,660 24,347 58.0 61.1 22,574 25,422 __ _ 19.7 21,032 25,791 24.7 21.7 22,218 26.553 18.0 22,656 27,552 19.0--2-0.0 23,707 28,742 ' aBKIUiSaS EIIE!I IC SCl::tlllll llISIBICIS aHMJaL EISCaL BEEOBI a!ffi1.r:m\n1 LEA ORDER PAGE NO. 7 El!:EEHSE 1220-21 HUl:11:!EBO E a:ll!i. SI.BY. NO. OF CERT. AVG. SLRY. - PER ADA TEACHERS K-12 TCHRS. K-12 PERSONNEL CERT. PERS. 90-91 91-92 A/D/A A/D/M 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 -- I Ea  COLIHD'. IUSIBICI BaHK 1 2 J 1 :i 6 1 8 9 10 11 12 - -- \"ltcQ2.JULI..ER_ ~l.._ 189 2,872\n1,305 70:5 749 50.0 51.0 22 779 25,926 53.0 :54.0 23,986 27,197 ~6::QJ 1:I1I I EB ElllJKE 120 2,62:Z 2,220 155 121 :a.1 ::i2,1 22,J!:!1 2!f!,i5 54.7 55.7 23,111 26,870 - 4-6-Q5 MILLER_ ____IEXAR.KrullL -1.9-1 2.,.791 3.,121\n! 5__,411 5 7'57 384.3 3B9.5 23,949 27,352 410.6 416.8 24 953 2B,293 47=0.i.-1'1ISSISSIPPI ~ _i_9_2_L850 ~4 218 232 21.4 21.8 22 820 26 179 23.4 23.8 24 056 27,587 11-02 MISSISSIEEI E!LYil::lE:Il l! .LE 1J 2,612 J,Q2Q 1,Q6 1,J2!\n! 271.9 277,6 23,197 27,561 296.0 295.7 24,866 28,693 41=:Q6 111..Sl:!ISSIPPI _SQ MISSISSIPPI 194 2.,_875\nI,_400 1_, 81:5 1\u0026amp;_5 135.8 139.4 21,763 25,354 144.2 147.8 22,764 26,449 - 41-Q8 1:1ISSISSIPPJ ~SNELL 195 ~170 ~617 2,1074 ~ 195 149.6 14B._5 2~95 2~16 159.1 158.0 26,389 30,109 ~:Z-12 l:1ISSISSIEEI MANILA 16 2,6::i2 2,1J 8::iJ 9Q\n'\ni 57.4 56.8 61,794 24,954 62.2 61.6 22,779 25,790 47-13 ...ttl.S_SISSIPPI 0 EOLA 197 2_,_636 ~993 ---..L094 2,213 141.8 142.0 2~~31 28,054 150.2 152.4 24,940 28,895 - 48-01 MONROE BRINKLEY 198 ~99 ~800 1,264 1L338 89.1 87.1 20,413 23,896 95.1 93.1 21,121 24,460 1EI-Q2 MllMBllE CLABEHllllH 1 2.~Q4 ~.Qi3 606 Q37 42.0 42.0 19,908 24,849 45.4 45.4 21,299 26,412 48-03 MONROE HOLLY GROVE 200 2,929 2,863 384 401 29.5 28.8 19,545 22,318 31.5 30.8 20,682 23,452 49-01 MONTGOMERY CADDO HILLS 201 2,661 2,901 522 549 38.0 38.3 21,664 24,400 41.0 41.3 22,848 25,855 12-02 !1!JHI!im!EBY 1:!Q!.!NTI DA 202 2,707 3,098 504 524 37.5 36.8 21,840 25,827 40.5 39.8 23,040 27,137 - 49-04 MONTGOMERY ODEN 203 3,461 3,703 215 227 19.5 19.5 22,264 24,224 21.5 21.5 23,121 25,446 - 50-04 NEVADA EHHET 204 _\n!__,982 3,323 143 151 13.0 12.0 19,106 23,854 15.0 14.0 20,489 25,302 ::iQ-Q6 HE:lllllla E:BESCQII 205 6,567 2,862 1,162 1,210 84.3 83.3 21,144 24,028 91.3 90.2 22,078 25,149 - 50-08 NEVADA - NEVADA COUNTY 206 _b638 ~031 692 731 48.1 49.0 21,590 24,755 51.1 52.0 22,489 25,675 51-01 NEWTON DEER 207 2,843 3,218 335 357 25.8 25.0 20,967 24,243 27.8 27.0 22,098 25,454 ::i1-Q2 HEWIQH JllPER 208 2,778 3,203 555 581 37.6 37.6 23,619 27,283 40.6 40.6 24,533 28,209 51-03 NEWTON MOUNT JUDEA 209 3,277 3,706 236 252 19.6 19.1 20,764 25,272 21.6 21.1 21,943 26,052 51-04 NEWTON WESTERN GROVE 210 2,743 3,273 267 283 21.1 21.4 20,175 23,780 23.2 23.5 21,487 24,766 ::i2-Q1 OUllCl:U Ill E!EARllEN 211 2,474 2,884 855 887 55.5 55.S 22,887 28,382 60.5 60.5 24,258 29,298 52-04 OUACHITA FAIRVIEW 212 ~648 3,045 3,910 4,086 261.3 253.8 24,070 28,414 280.2 273.8 25,136 29,537 52-05 OUACHUA HARMONY GROVE 213 ~563~038 760 788 48.5 49.5 22,977 26,960 51.5 52.5 23,926 27,902 -- ::i2-Q6 lll.ll:ICl:Uill SIEE:l:lEtlS 214\n,?, 7:\ni1 3,Q08 502 519 35.0 35.0 22,436 25,768 38.0 38.0 23,562 26,678 53-01 PERRY EAST END 215 ~781 3 242 490 523 36.5 37.0 20,819 25,861 39.3 39.9 21,980 26,889 53-02 PERRY PERRY CASA 216 4 405 4,182 167 184 19.2 15.7 23,028 24,809 21.2 17.7 24,200 26,192 :iJ-QJ EEBBY E:EBBY:llI!..1.E 217 2,489 3,041 807 848 50.9 53.5 22,719 26,790 53.9 56.5 23,797 27,602 54-01 PHILLIPS BARTON/LEXA 218 2,453 2,905 710 741 45.0 47.0 22,438 26,247 48.0 50.0 23,600 27,440 54-02 PHILLIPS ELAINE 219 2,774 3,144 698 744 53.0 54.0 20,938 23,921 56.6 56.6 21,778 25,043 -- ::i1-QJ E:l:lILLIE:S HEI.EHA-l!!EST HE!..EN220 2,721 2,904 4,075 4,318 289.0 286.0 22,302 24,928 306.0 303.0 23,156 25,860 54-04 PHILLIPS HARVELL 221 2,723 2,966 823 870 57.5 57.0 22,276 25,284 63.4 61.2 23,274 25,953 54-05 PHILLIPS LAKE VIEW 222 3,240 2,778 213 214 19.3 18.1 16,691 19,376 22.3 21.1 18,092 20,945 ::i::i-Qi E:IKE DELIGHT 223 3,090 3,301 375 393 34.0 32.6 19,588 22,701 37.0 35.6 20,784 24,16_1 __ S:5-02 PIKE GLENWOOD 224 2,:528 2,753 399 419 30.5 30.5 18,369 21,333 33.5 33.5 19,708 22,522 55-03 PIKE KIRBY 225 2,710 3,179 424 447 35.2 36.5 19,945 22,027 39.1 40.4 20,873 23,007 - 55-04 PIKE MURFREESBORO 226 2,727 3,144 555 583 44.2 43.3 22,202 25,552 47.2 46.3 23,310 26,761 56-02 POINSETT HARRISBURG 227 2,563 2,811 916 976 65.0 63.8 21,791 24,279 69.0 67.8 22,612 25,086 56-04 POINSETT HARKED TREE 228 2,668 2,942 847 894 64.5 64.0 20,983 24,052 68.0 67.5 21,675 24,759 ::i6-05 POINSETT TRUMANN 229 2,655 2,939 1,568 1,673 115.1 111.9 21,395 25,291 124.8 120.6 22,393 26,245 56-07 POINSETT WEINER 230 2,963 3,482 378 395 30.5 32.6 20,459 23,390 32.5 34.6 21,265 24,150 56-08 POINSETT EAST POINSETT COU231 2,553 2,859 776 817 58.o 56.5 20,599 24,198 62.0 60.5 21,467 25,059 57-01 POLK ACORN 232 3,134 3,304 327 352 26.2 26.0 23,766 25,685 28.2 28.0 25,225 27,131 57-02 POLK - HATFIELD 233 3,083 3,266 282 299 24.0 23.6 20,080 24,073 26.8 26.4 21,186 25,151 57-03 POLI\u0026lt; MENA 234 2,494 2,927 1,697 1,786 111.5 113.5 24,930 28,810 117.9 120.0 25,675 29,642 57-04 POLK VAN COVE 235 2,969 3,248 355 375 30.3 31.3 20,563 22,727 33.3 34.3 21,814 23,885 - - - - - - --- - -- - - - -- - -- - --- - - ------- - - - - - - ' ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS ANNUAL FISCAL REPORT ANALYSIS LEA ORDER PAGE NO. 8 EXPENSE 1990-91 NUMBER OF AVG. SLRY, NO. Of CERT. AVG. SLRY. PER ADA TEACHERS K-12 TCHRS. K-12 PERSONNEL __ CERT. PERS. 90-91 91-92 A/D/A A/D/M 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92_'1'._0-91 91-92 LEA ,t COUNTY DISTRICT RANK 1 2 3 4 s 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 57-05 POLK WICKES 236 2,621 3,016 451 475 30.0 30.6 22,692 2~60 32.5 33.1 24_, 108 26,~18 58-01 POPE ATKINS 237 2,561 2,867 1.035 1.097 70.0 70,0 23.930 27,570 75.0 75.0 24,663 28,238 58-02 POPE DOVER 238 2,465 2,857 1,113 1,177 70.0 73.0 23,319 2~826 75.0 78.0 ~022 27~4 58-03 POPE HECTOR 239 2,650 3,051 633 667 46.0 47.0 22,406 25,015 49.0 so.~__,_133 25L924 58-04 POPE POTTSVILLE 240 2,557 2,812 671 707 45.0 48.0 25,001 26,620 48.0 51.0 25,738 27,432 58-05 POPE RUSSELLVILLE 241 2,803 3,330 4,630 4,879 303.6 310.9 25,798 30,231 323.3 331.7 26,963 31,387 59-01 PRAIRIE DES ARC 242 2,329 2,791 642 676 40.7 41.9 21,648 25,241 43.8 45.0 22,547 26,125 59-02 PRAIRIE DEVALLS BLUFF 243 2,693 3,003 458 477 35 .. 5 32.9 19,993 24,202 38.3 35.7 21,060 25,345 59-03 PRAIRIE HAZEN 244 2,459 2,630 538 560 38.6 36.5 19,206 22,792 41.6 39.5 20,339 23,917 60-01 PULASKI LITTLE ROCK 245 4,296 4,765 22,397 24,090 1,822.0 1,839.3 28,205 31,371 1,970.0 1,986.3 29,510 32,960 60-02 PULASKI NORTH LITTLE ROCK246 3,407 3,691 8,976 9,653 609.6 609.5 25,249 28,656 666.1 666.0 26,522 29,976 60-03 PULASKI PULASKI COUNTY SP247 3,319 3,447 20,767 22,149 1,346.7 1,340.7 27,563 27,732 1,44S .. 3 1,454.3 28,667 28,830 61-01 RANDOLPH BIGGERS-REYNO 248 3,205 3,428 197 206 18.6 19.0 19,721 22,032 20.6 21.0 20,653 22,895 61-02 RANDOLPH MAYNARD 249 2,761 3,074 489 517 36.4 37.6 21,024 23,937 41.0 41.7 22,073 25,151 61-03 RANDOLPH POCAHONTAS 250 2,380 2,864 1,707 1,807 109.6 115.6 23,513 27,085 115.6 121.6 24,301 27,662 61-04 RANDOLPH RANDOLPH COUNTY 251 2,975 3,320 290 306 23.4 23.4 19,252 22,588 26.4 26.4 20,303 24,072 62-01 ST FRANCIS FORREST CITY 252 2,649 2,870 4,896 5,177 296.6 299.2 23,470 26,789 330.1 332.7 24,587 27,705 62-02 ST FRANCIS HUGHES 253 2,727 3,119 1,058 1,099 75.5 76.5 22,664 25,381 83.4 84.3 23,741 26,598 62-05 ST FRANCIS PALESTINE/WHEATLE254 2,768 2,916 656 681 48.0 44.0 21,968 24,550 52.0 48.0 22,901 25,470 63-01 SALINE BAUXITE 255 3,039 3,401 621 656 39.5 40.0 25,259 28,632 42.5 43.0 26,561 29,877 63-02 SALINE BENTON 256 2,488 2,907 3,834 4,020 239.8 243.0 23,854 27,888 254.8 258.0 24,780 28,915 63-03 SALINE BRYANT 257 2,276 2,722 4,903 5,216 286.6 292.6 25,815 30,085 301.5 309.5 26,520 30,875 63-04 SALINE HARMONY GROVE 258 2,564 3,033 591 618 38.5 41.5 23,031 25,728 41.5 44.5 24,335 27,102 63-06 SALINE PARON 259 3,994 4,366 215 229 19.4 19.'5 22,320 26,619 21.4 21.5 23,368 27,371 64-01 SCOTT WALDRON 260 2,814 3,235 1,424 1,511 109.1 108.5 21,944 24,952 115.3 115.3 22,658 25,840 65-01 SEARCY LESLIE 261 2,742 3,069 286 302 19.9 19.6 19,000 22,950 22.9 22.5 21.156 24,774 65-02 SEARCY MARSHALL 262 2,646 2,965 697 736 50.5 51.5 21,313 24,246 53.5 54.5 22,120 24_, 725 65-03 SEARCY SAINT JOE 263 3,678 4,116 202 214 19.5 19.5 19,352 23,262 21.5 21.5 20,761 24~9 65-04 SEARCY WITTS SPRINGS 264 5,293 5,726 94 99 14.8 14.8 18,050 20,234 16.8 16.8 19,145 21.278 66-01 SEBASTIAN FORT SMITH 265 3,123 3,639 10,921 11,633 757.1 785.2 27,849 31,070 805.4 834.9 28,883 32J 136 66-02 SEBASTIAN GREENWOOD 266 2,516 2,909 2,290 2,398 142.1 148.6 25,396 28J836 150.1 156.6 26,332 29,770 66-03 SEBASTIAN HACKETT 267 2,504 2,930 525 547 39.0 38.0 21.604 25,605 42.0 41.0 22,544 26,692 66-04 SEBASTIAN HARTFORD 268 2,910 3,344 440 470 36.5 36.5 21,097 23,934 39.7 39.7 22,035 24,920 66-05 SEBASTIAN LAVACA 269 2,497 2,801 721 761 50.5 51.6 20,793 23,3-40 53.5 54 .. 6 21,850 24,201 66-06 SEBASTIAN MANSFIELD 270 2,734 3,061 832 873 58.8 58.8 23.408 25.834 62.8 63.5 24,420 27.038 67-01 SEVIER DEQUEEN 271 2,407 2,788 1,449 1,519 88.8 90.4 23,566 26,561 94.3 96.4 24,568 27,738 67-03 SEVIER HORATIO 272 2,207 2,852 520 544 31.8 35.6 21,758 27,490 34.7 38.6 23,187 28,360 67-04 SEVIER LOCKESBURG 273 2,552 2,806 447 472 32.6 33.4 20,950 23,775 35.6 36.4 22,255 24,967 68-02 SHARP CAVE CITY 274 2,528 2,976 950 998 60.0 64.3 23,340 26,548 64.0 68.3 24,204 27,317 68-03 SHARP EVENING SHADE 275 2,941 3,386 262 273 24.0 24.7 18,271 21,090 26.0 26.7 19,470 22,054 68-04 SHARP HIGHLAND 276 2,418 2,674 1,229 1,290 75.5 79.0 22,162 24,775 80.5 84.0 23,154 25,869 68-05 SHARP WILLIFORD 277 3,197 3,247 258 271 22.0 22.5 19,234 21,649 2-4.5 25.0 20,713 22,744 68-06 SHARP POUGHKEEPSIE 278 3,842 3,'598 115 120 15.1 14.0 18,377 19,044 17.1 16.0 19,478 19,503 69-01 STONE MOUNTAIN VIEW 279 2,352 2,635 1,036 1,084 65.0 65.0 23,596 27,042 ~ 69.0 24,492 27,986 69-02 STONE STONE COUNTY 280 3,162 3,898 223 234 18.5 18.8 20,093 26,395 2~ 20.8 21,104 26,885 69-04 STONE RURAL SPECIAL 281 3,234 3,397 227 236 18.5 17.5 22,961 26,270 20.5 19.5 23,989 26,960 70-01 UNION EL DORADO 282 2,718 3,050 4,824 5,110 339.4 339.3 23,278 26,673 360.2 359.1 24,106 27,512 ' ARKANSAS PllBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS ANNUAL FISCAL REPORT ANALYSIS LEA ORDER PAGE NO. 9 EXPENSE 1990 91 NUMBER Of AYv, SLRY. NO. OF CERT. AVG. SLRY. _?ER ADA TEACHERS K-12 TCHRS. K-12 PERSONNEL CERT. PERS. 90-91 91-92 A~ A/D/H 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 I EA t COUNTY DISTRICT RANK 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 8 9 10 11 12 0-02. UlilQN._ ttUIIICii 283 3...__1_4~39 279 293 21.0 22.0 22,776 25,112 23.0 24.0 23,922 26,451 10-03 llNION ,HJNCTION CITY 284 2.600 2,810 869 910\n58.1 58.1 24,091 27.353 60.3 60.3 25. 116 28,311 - ~ UNION J'1QUN.T.l :IQLLY_ 285 4. 294 -5..,_Qfli 212 224 21.5 24.3 22,745 23.644 23.S 27.0 24 093 25,146 -7.Q-Q6__L/N_I_ JfCIBfltL.EI 286 2 , 60 7 ~ 563 583 41.0 41.0 23,212 26,417 44.0 44.0 24 261 27 219 70-07 llNION PARKERS CHAPEL 287 2,549 3.004 618 643 44.6 45.6 21.989 26,020 47.6 48.6 22,884 26,925 70-08 UNION SMACKOVER_ 288 2,668~0 800 837 so.a 52.4 23 765 27,066 54.8 56.4 24,945 28,160 70-09 UNION STRONG 289 2 938 3_,_155 544 564 43.0 41.0 21 651 25 244 46.3 44.0 22,515 26,101 70-11 UNION UNION 290 3,087 3,399 311 326 25,1 25.0 21,886 24,188 28.0 28.0 23,293 25,651 71-01 VAN BUREN ALREAD 291 4.,___'l_,!OS _,_270 93 99 13.1 13.1 19,780 21.502 15.2 15.3 21.262 23,133 71-02 VAN BUREN CLINTON 292 2,463 2,829 1,073 1,126 70.3 74.0 2~278 25,652 75.0 79.0 23,318 26,568 71-03 YAN BUREN SCOTLAND 293 3,655 4,078 130 135 14.0 14.S 19,973 21,899 16.0 16.S 21,154 23,335 71-04 VAN BUREN SHIRLEY 294 2,721 3_,__055 491 512 34.9 35.0 20,944 24,957 37.9 38.0 22,159 25,968 71-05 VAN BUREN SOUTH SIDE 295 2,877 3,124 412 431 33.0 33.0 21,490 23,696 35.5 36.0 22,060 24,517 12-01 WASHIN(\nTON ELKINS 296 2,691 3,336 683 722 45.4 46.4 22,933 28,969 48.4 49.4 23,955 29,881 72-02 WASHINGTON FARMINGTON 297 2,447 3,001 1.038 1,096 67.8 70.6 21,545 26,400 72.6 75.3 22,619 27,459 72-03 WASHINGTON FAYETTEVILLE 298 2,812 3,117 6,029 6,328 394.1 404.9 27,172 30,441 416.6 426.9 27,882 31,160 72-04 WASHINGTON GREENLAND 299 2,404 3. 172 651 689 43.0 44.3 21. 167 27,310 46.0 47.3 22,285 28,225 72-05 WASHIN(\nTON LINCOLN 300 2,696 2,958 929 987 65.4 65.2 21.499 24,299 69.4 70.2 22,440 25,281 72-06 WASHINGTON PRAIRIE GROVE 301 2,545 2,923 1,013 1,070 63.8 68.4 23,326 26,225 68.8 73.4 24,414 27,141 12-01 WASHINGTON SPRINGDALE 302 2.735 3,145 6,977 7,450 442.0 449.5 26,365 30,062 477.0 485.5 27,504 31,244 72-08 WASHIN(\nTON WEST FORK 303 2,596 2,957 894 932 61.4 59.4 20,860 24,222 66.4 64.4 22,017 25,501 72-09 WASHINGTON WINSLOW 304 3,124 3,551 223 236 20.0 20.4 18,706 21,297 22.0 22.4 19,855 22,564 7.3-01 WHITE BALD KNOB 305 2,701 3,031 1,322 1,397 86.4 84.8 22,921 26,642 91.9 90.9 23,756 27,616 73-02 WHITE BEEBE 306 2,335 2,763 1,575 1,670 103.4 106.7 21,807 26,192 109.6 113.9 22,683 26,867 73-03 WHITE BRADFORD 307 2,627 2,989 547 575 39.7 40.0 21,833 25,472 42.7 43.0 22,926 26,627 7.3-04 WHITE CENTRAL 308 2,468 2,818 503 529 37.3 37.3 20,620 24,579 39.8 39.8 21,704 25,576 73-05 WHITE GRIFFITHVILLE 309 ~024 161 168 17.6 19,502 19.9 21,079 73-06 WHITE JUDSONIA 310 2,626 554 592 38.0 22,494 41.0 23,729 13-01 WHITE KENSETT 311 2,861 3,242 474 504 34.0 89.2 23,050 25,802 37.0 97.2 24,554 27,032 73-08 WHITE MCRAE 312 2,640 3,003 306 323 25.1 25.4 19,335 22,501 27.S 27.S 20,353 23,453 73-09 WHITE PANGBURN 313 2,776 3,195 568 597 42.0 42.7 21,758 24,359 45.5 46.2 22,839 25,689 13-10 WHITE ROSE BUD 314 2,733 3,143 517 547 37.8 39.3 21,773 24,722 40.8 42.3 22,973 25,683 73-11 WHITE. SEARCY 315 2,587 2,937 2,867 3,032 181.2 191.2 24,293 27,138 194.8 205.0 25,359 28,269 74-01 WOODRUFF AUGUSTA 316 2J649 3,108 639 673 46.2 46.2 20,958 23,980 49.2 49.2 22,297 25,414 14-02 WQOPB!.!EE !\nOTTON PLANT 317 2,856 3,055 325 340 28.4 27.4 18,7S5 22,078 30.9 29.9 19,680 23,099 74-03 WOODRUFF MCCRORY 318 2 361 2,656 823 860 53.0 51.7 22,743 2S,741 56.S 55.2 23,534 26,712 75-03 YELL DANVILLE 319 2 581 2,853 526 555 38.6 38.6 21,581 25,063 41.6 41.6 22,664 26,117 15-04 YELL DARDANELLE 320 2,606 2,836 1,335 1,409 91.9 90.5 21,614 24,497 97.2 96.3 22,307 25,274 75-05 YELL FOURCHE VALLEY 3~346 5,125 128 136 16.4 18.2 19. 128 22,348 18.4 20.2 20,494 23,349 75-07 YELL OLA 322 2 483 2,884 470 504 36.3 37.3 19,697 21,984 39.3 40.3 20,802 23,3S5 15-08 YELL PLAINVIEW-ROYER 323 2,928 3,041 320 337 26.8 24.9 18,969 21,888 29.8 26.9 20,212 23. 100 75-09 YELL WESTERN YELL COUN324 3J360 3,390 362 385 35.0 32.7 20. 116 22,233 38.0 35.7 21,124 23,393 --------------------------- - - --- -- ----- ---- ---------- ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS ANNUAL FISCAL REPORT ANALYSIS COLUMN 1 RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER PAGE NO. 10 EXPENSE 1990-91 NUMBER OF AVG. SLRY. NO. OF CERT. AVG. SLRY. PER ADA TEACHERS K-12 TCHRS . K-1'\u0026gt;- PERSONNEL CERT . PERS . 90-91 91-92 A/D/A A/D/M 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 LEA,:, COUNTY DISTRICT RANK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 21-01 DESHA ARKANSAS CITY 1 6 165 6,609 145 152 18.2 17.0 22 727 23 780 20.7 19.5 25 110 26 262 32-06 INDEPENDENCE NEWARK 2 5 384 5 823 711 742 70.0 70.1 28 616 28 774 75 3 75.4 29 495 29 644 65-04 SEARCY WITTS SPRINGS 3 5 293 5 726 94 99 14.8 14.8 18 050 20 234 16.8 16.8 19 145 21 278 71-01 VAN BUREN ALREAD 4 4,920 5,270 93 99 13.1 13.1 19 780 21 502 15.2 15.3 21 262 23 133 03-06 BAXTER TRI-COUNTY CON. 5 4 809 4 762 151 159 18.3 13.8 20 313 23 402 20.3 16.3 21 378 25 052 31-06 HOWARD UMPIRE 6 4,781 5,471 123 127 14.9 15.6 20 349 22,369 17.8 18.5 22 124 24 559 53-02 PERRY PERRY CASA 7 4,405 4,182 167 184 19.2 15.7 23,028 24,809 21.2 17.7 24,200 26 192 75-05 YELL FOURCHE VALLEY 8 4 346 5 125 128 136 16.4 18.2 19,128 22 348 18.4 20.2 20 494 23 349 60-01 PULASKI LITTLE ROCK 9 4,296 4,765 22,397 24,090 1,822.0 1,839.3 28,205 31,371 1,970.0 1,986.3 29,510 32,960 70-05 UNION MOUNT HOLLY 10 4,294 5,081 212 224 21.5 24.3 22,745 23,644 23.5 27 .. 0 24,093 25,146 36-05 JOHNSON OARK 11 4 027 4 242 150 158 16.9 17.9 19 417 21 674 18.9 19.9 20 721 23 160 73-05 WHITE GRIFFITHVILLE 12 4,024 161 168 17.6 19,502 19.9 21,079 63-06 SALINE PARON 13 3,994 4,366 215 229 19.4 19.5 22,320 26,619 21.4 21 .. 5 23,368 27,371 47-01 MISSISSIPPI ARMOREL 14 3,850 4,344 218 232 21.4 21.8 22 820 26,179 23.4 23.8 24,056 27,587 68-06 SHARP POUGHKEEPSIE 15 3,842 3,598 115 120 15.1 14.0 18,377 19,044 17.1 16.0 19,478 19,503 65-03 SEARCY SAINT JOE 16 3,678 4,116 202 214 19.5 19.5 19,352 23,262 21.5 21.5 20,761 24,499 41-03 LITTLE RIVER WINTHROP 17 3,675 3,738 169 176 14.6 14.6 20 966 23 019 16.6 16.6 22 339 24 477 71-03 VAN BUREN SCOTLAND 18 3,655 4,078 130 135 14.0 14.5 19,973 21,899 16.0 16.5 21,154 23,335 43-05 LONOKE HUMNOKE 19 3,647 3,727 169 180 15.8 17 .1 18,729 19,880 17.8 19.1 19,963 21,024 ~-01 COLUMBIA EMERSON 20 3 554 3 788 341 354 30.6 27.1 23 895 26 812 33.6 30.1 25 319 28 474 23-02 FAULKNER ENOLA 21 3,529 121 126 13.1 17,962 14.6 19,520 ~-05 FRANKLIN PLEASANT VIEW 22 3,528 3,790 227 240 22.0 22 .. 5 18,844 20,650 24.0 24.5 20,113 22,059 20-01 DALLAS CARTHAGE 23 3,483 3,725 165 172 17.5 17.5 19 528 21 383 19.5 19.5 20 894 22 722 34-04 JACKSON SWIFTON 24 3,474 3,563 181 191 20.1 19.6 18,578 20,946 22.1 21.6 20,019 22,423 49-04 MONTGOMERY ODEN 25 3,461 3,703 215 227 19.5 19.5 22,264 24,224 21 .. 5 21.5 23,121 25,446 26-04 GARLAND JESSI EV ILLE 26 3,454 3,321 566 593 41.7 41.7 27,093 27,444 44.7 45.7 28,196 27 999 38-07 LAWRENCE STRAWBERRY 27 3,432 3,885 216 224 21.2 21.0 20,052 21,645 23.2 23.4 21,372 23,288 60-02 PULASKI NORTH LITTLE ROCK 28 3,407 3,691 8,976 9,653 609.6 609.5 25,249 28,656 666.1 666.0 26,522 29,976 75-09 YELL WESTERN YELL COLIN 29 3 360 3 390 362 385 35.0 32.7 20 116 22 233 38.0 35.7 21 124 23 393 28-06 GREENE STANFORD 30 3,357 J,548 194 201 20.1 20.5 19,263 20,816 22.4 22.8 20,131 21,694 60-03 PULASKI PULASKI COUNTY SP 31 3,319 3,447 20,767 22,149 1,346.7 1,340.7 27,563 27,732 1,445.3 1,454.3 28,667 28,830 26-03 GARLAND HOT SPRINGS 32 3,307 3,430 3,116 3 364 239.2 232.8 24 490 27 350 255.2 248.3 25 599 28 802 34-02 JACKSON GRUBBS 33 3,306 3,673 188 200 19.3 19.3 17,374 20,410 21.3 21.3 18,485 21,324 38-05 LAWRENCE LYNN 34 3,281 3,810 228 237 20.0 20.9 20,890 23,520 22 .. 2 23.4 21,718 24 418 51-03 NEWTON MOUNT JUDEA 35 3,277 3 706 236 252 19.6 19.1 20 764 25 272 21.6 21.1 21 943 26 052 54-05 PHILLIPS LAKE VIEW 36 3,240 2,778 213 214 19.3 18.1 16,691 19,376 22.3 21.1 18,092 20 945 32-03 INDEPENDENCE CUSHMAN 37 3,235 3,814 271 286 22.9 24.8 21,442 24,645 25.4 27.3 22,633 25,939 69-04 STONE RURAL SF'ECIAL 38 3,234 3,397 227 236 18.5 17.5 22 961 26 270 20.5 19.5 23 989 26 960 33-03 IZARD MOUNT F'LEASANT 39 3,213 3,518 265 274 24.6 24.5 22,182 24,694 26.6 26 .. 5 21,885 24,298 61-01 RANDOLPH BIGGERS-REYNO 40 3,205 3,428 197 206 18.6 19.0 19,721 22,032 20.6 21.0 20,653 22,895 05-06 BOONE LEAD HILL 41 3,202 3,529 329 347 27.5 27.8 19 972 23 130 30.3 30.6 21 469 24 467 23-04 FAULKNER GUY-PERKINS 42 3,198 3,459 272 283 23.0 23 .. 5 20,696 23,355 25.0 25 .. 5 21,847 24,396 68-05 SHARP WILLIFORD 43 3,197 3,247 258 271 22.0 22 ..5 19,234 21,649 24 ...5 25.0 20,713 22,744 01-02 ARKANSAS GILLETT 44 3,174 3,705 278 288 23.6 24.6 20 081 21 921 26 .. 5 27.5 21 637 23 436 47-08 MISSISSIPPI GOSNELL 45 3,170 3,617 2,074 2,195 149.6 148.5 25,495 29,216 159.1 158.0 26,389 30,109 02-04 ASHLEY PARKDALE 46 3,169 3,231 145 152 1.4.7 12.8 17,735 20,021 16.7 14.8 17,592 19,567 05-04 BOONE OMAHA 47 3,168 3,633 282 298 23.5 24 .. 5 21,440 23 723 26.1 27 .. 1 22,720 25,302 38-06 LAWRENCE 30-03 HOT SPRING 41.::22 LITTLE RIVER 50-04 NEVADA 37-02 02-02 ASHLEY 56-07 POINSETT 68-03 SHARP 70-09 UNION N 48-03 HONROE 75-08 YELL 03-02 32-02 20-03 LAFAYETTE COLUHBIA BA TIAN BAXTER INDEPENDENCE DALLAS ARKANSAS PIIRI IC SCHOOi DISTRICTS ANNIIAL FISCAL REPQRT ANALYSTS COLUMN 1 RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER PAGE NO. 11 AVG. SLRY. FOUNTAIN HILL WEINER L BRIGHT STAR KINGSTON AL R EVENING SHADE STRONG_ _ WA ASEKA-TUCKER HOLLY GROVE PLAINVIEW-ROVER SU PH ROCK BRADLEY TAYLOR HARTFORD COTTER CORD-CHARLOTTE SPARKHAN 2,906 2,892 2 888 1990-91 NUMBERO F AVG. SLRY. NO. OF CERT, TEACHERS K-12 91-92 A/D/A A/D/M 90-91 91-92 TCHRS. K-12 90-91 91-92 PERSONNEL 90-91 91-92 CERT. PERS. 90-91 91-92 3,323 3,141 3 344 3,148 3,381 3 031 9 10 11 12 20.s 20.0 21,104 26,885 ___ _ 23.0 24.0 23 922 26 451 28.2 28.0 25,225 2--2L_131 ___ _ 13.3 12.8 21 094 24 394 22.0 22.4 19 855 22 564 32.6 19,588 22,701 37.0 35.6 20,784 24,161 ---- 88.0 22,429 25,216 95.7 94.0 23,368 26,245 ___ _ ~ .1 25.0 21 886 24 188 28.0 28.0 23 293 25 651 ----\"\"'-''---L-- 24.0 23.6 20,080 ~.073 26.8 __ 26.4 21,186 25,151 62.S 62.S 24,393 27,180 67.0 67.0 25,672 28,428~--- 285 21.4 23.2 21 828 24 835 24.1 25.4 22,888 25,892 --=1~7~7,__14.2 15.4 18,682 22,473 16.2 17.4 21,181 25,723 ---- 656 39.5 40.0 25,259 28,632 42.S 43.0 26,561 29,877 250 18.0 19.0 22 841 26 009 20.0 21.0 24,385 27,592 500 37.9 __ ~3~7-=-2.93 ,187 25,777 40.9 40.9 24,489 26,889 ---- 582 43.9 42.0 21,175 23,619 46.-9--45.0 22,112:24,778 ___ _ 268 17.0 17.0 25 864 28 709 19~19.0 27 408 30,378 569 590 43.6 42.6 21,414 2_1,_J.Q9 46.6 45.6 22,450 25,103 ___ _ 143 151 13.0 12.0 19,106 23,854 15.-0--14.0 20,489 25,302 ~ 602 2 773 183.5 183.5 23 103 25 458 200.0 200.0 24,252 26,867 290 306 23.4 23.4 19,252 22,588 26.4 26.4 20,303 24,072 324 34_1_ _ 27.1 26.6 19,060 21,556 30.1 29.6 20,755 23,048 7 116 7 518 459.3 459.0 26 811 29,916 491.0 491.5 27,755 30,847 474 _4~9~9,___ 44.0 43.3 19,333 21,625 47.0 46.3 20,269 22,6_5_4 ___ _ 579 --=6~1~2..__43.3 40.3 22,519 26,079 46.8 43.8 23,713 27,300 ___ _ 355 375 30.3 31.3 20 563 22 727 33.3--34.3 21,814 23,885 244 --=2~6~5..__21.3 _ _,2=1...,3 ,20, 106 25,000 23.3 23.3 21,703 26,863 378 _3=9~5~_ 30.5 32.6 20,459 23,390 32.5 34.6 21,265 24,150 496 524 34.8 33.7 21 691 25 393 38.1 36.7 23,150 26,894 248 259 17.0 18.0 22,656 27,552_~1=9_._0 __ ~2_0_._0~2=3~,7_0_7_2_8_~_,7_ 4_2 _ 206 _ _,3=0=0..__---'2=1..,__,__.o=-------=2=-1-=-2-=5,-6o4--3- -=21,4982 3.0 23.0 23,02s 27,229 235 242 21.5 20.7 18 985_2\"'-\".11~L7~9_~_0 =2~4~~0:.__~2~3~~2:....!2~0~,~4~9~6~2~3~,~0~7~8~--- 262 273 24.0 24.7 18,271 21,090 26.0 26.7 19,470 22,054 544 564 43.0 41.0 21,651 25,244 46.3 44.0 22,515 26,101 265 282 21.0 20.0 18 326 22,969 24.0 23.0 19,553 24,399 384 401 29.5 28.8 19,545 22,318 31.5 30.8 20,682 23,452 320 337 26.8 24.9 18,969 21,888 29.8 26.9 20,212 23,100 280 2~ 24.3 23.4 20 340 23,265 26.3 25.4 21,519 24,554 440 469 _ _,3\"--'7\"--'.'--'5'-----=3'---'71--=\"2-=-0=:5c'---7c2-20'c2,- =9,\"_'-,9 =-_--,,\n4_.,: :,0-=-=-4.,:.\n,\n5:5\no ,2..1c,.4 22 24, 132 328 341 26.0 26.0 21,169 23,497 29.0 29.0 22,615 25,088 440 470 36.5 36.5 21,097 23,934 39.7 39.7 22,035 24,920 502 530 38.6 38.8 21,655 23,710 41.6 41.8 22,844 25,101 249 259 19.7 _ ____.c2~0~21.6,6 62 24,815 345 362 28.S 26.1 19,954 23,089 21.7 22.6 23,106 26,223 -=3=0-.=5~-=2=0-.1 21,392 24,050 ---------- -------- 4 1 i 6 7 i 58-05 26-01 46-05 53-01 Si- 73-09 54-02 35-02 01-05 62-05 61-02 52-06 51-04 42-04 65-01 19-03 45-02 72-07 66-06 73-10 02-03 55-04 62-02 CRITTENDEN POPE GARLAND HILLER PERRY NEWTON WHITE PHILLIPS JEFFERSON ARKANSAS ST FRANCIS RANDOLPH OUACHITA NEWTON LOGAN SEARCY CROSS MARION WASHINGTON SEBASTIAN WHITE ASHLEY PIKE ST FRANCIS ARKANSAPSU BLIC SCHOOLD ISTRICTS ANNUAFLI SCAL REPORTA NALYSIS COLUMN 1 RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER TEXARK EAST END JA E PANGBURN ELAINE DOLLARWAY HUMPHREY PALESTINE/WHEAT MAYNARD STEPHENS WESTERN GROVE SCRANTON 1 LESLIE 133 PARKIN 134 YELLVILLE-SUMMIT 135 SPRINGDALE 136 MANSFIELD 137 ROSE BUD 138 HAMBURG 139 MURFREESBORO 140 HUGHES 141 EXPENSE PER ADA 90-91 91-92 2,742 2,736 2 736 2,735 2,734 2 733 2,729 2,727 2 727 3,069 3,509 3 017 3,145 3,061 3 143 2,984 3,144 3 119 1990-91 NUMBEORF TEACHERS K-12 A/D/A A/D/H 90-91 91-92 286 19.9 554 42.0 791 55.0 57.6 6,977 7,450 442.0 449.5 832 873 58.8 58.8 517 547 37.8 39.3 1,630 1,714 109.5 110.0 555 583 44.2 43.3 1 058 1 099 75.5 76.5 19,000 22L950 20,121 23,897 21 660 24 347 26,365 30,062 23,408 25,834 21 773 24 722 21,956 25,346 22,202 25,552 22 664 25 381 22.9 45.0 58.0 477.0 62 .. 8 40.8 117.2 47.2 83.4 PAGE NO. 12 23.5 21.,_187 9 23 9 0 22.S 21~6 24,774 45.3__\n!1_,520 25,407 61.1 2? 574 25 422 485.5 27,504 3L__,244 63.5 24,420 27,038 42.3 22 973 25 683 117.3 23,234 26,604 46.3 23,310 26,761 84.3 23 741 26 598 ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS ANNUAL FISCAL REPORT ANALYSIS _cm.uMl'L1._RA~D IN,_.D=E~s~c~EtlN~D~r~N~G.,_,O~R~D~E~R-'--------------------~P~A~G~E,_,_N~0~-'--\"1~3:...._ ___ _ EXPENSE 1990-91 NUMBERO F AVG. SLRY. NO. OF CERT. AVG. SLRY. Pr::-R ADA TEACHERS K-12 . ~ TCHRS K-1,., PERSONNEL CERT . PERS . -- 90-91 91-92 A/D/A A/D/M 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 C-A ,I, r-nrNTY n - --- OA\"-'V  ? 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 W::A -nA DUTI TDC, MARV\"\"' L 142 2 723 2 966 823 870 57.5 57.0 22 276 25,284 63.4 61.2 23,274 25,953 5,4 .i\\-Z OUTO O JPS uc-o C-UA. -Wi:-!!:Tuc -o C-\"-' c A \"7 I? '??\u0026lt; ? 01\\A \"' 075 \"' :-it\u0026lt;8 289.0 286.0 22 302 24 928 306.0 303.0 23 156 25 860 '?f .i\\A \\IAU DOJOC-U SMTRLEY 144 2 721 3 055 491 512 34.9 35.0 20 944 24 957 37.9 38.0 22,159 25,968 nt-01 s DEWITT 145 2 718 3 109 1 317 1 378 92.7 94.7 23 157 26 141 98.9 101.1 24,016 27,140 '?0-0t I UJTM\"-' c-1 nnoAnn t A.L '? '?1 A :-it \"\"\"\" 4 A2A 5 110 339.4 339.3 23 278 26 673 360.2 359.1 24 106 27 512 ,,\"' .n-. !='IIL T ON VIOLA 147 2 711 3 047 398 415 29.5 30.0 21 778 24,765 31.5 32.0 22,917 25,992 a:-:: .o:-i\nPTll'c- KIRBY 148 2 710 3 179 424 447 35.2 36.5 19 945 22 027 39.1 40.4 20,873 23,007 t :-it-Ot r1 ~.,~, A\"'\" llTNr:.- u,- fAO ? '?OA :-it O'?,\u0026lt;., 394 411 26 8 '\u0026gt;6.6 19 836 23 259 29.8 29.4 20 738 24 406 49 02 Mn\u0026gt;JTGOMERY MOUNT IDA 150 2 707 3 098 504 524 37.5 36.8 21 840 25,827 40.5 39.8 23,040 27,137 73-01 WHITE BALD KNOB 151 2 701 3 031 1 322 1 397 86.4 84.8 22,921 26,642 91.9 90.9 23,756 27,616 \"\"\"' -iO  t-  N ~ T TF\" H\"' I 152 2 699 2 865 2 724 2 884 179.0 177.0 24 662 27 786 191.0 189.0 25,507 28,619 H-06 CLAY CLAY COUNTY CENTR153 2,697 2,968 748 782 54.7 54.7 21,391 23,965 57.7 57.7 22,211 24,796 32-11 INDEPENDENCE MIDLAND 154 2 697 3,003 582 618 44.4 45.2 21,141 24,131 47.4 48.2 22,099 25,254 i2-01 N r::-QURNE CONCORD 155 2 696 3 197 483 515 34.0 33.3 21,824 26,690 37.0 36.3 23,141 27,726 72-05 WASHINGTON LINCOLN 156 2 696 2 958 929 987 65.4 65.2 21,499 24,299 69.4 70.2 22,440 25,281 59-02 PRAIRIE DEVALLS BLUFF 157 2 693 3 003 458 477 35.5 32.9 19,993 24,202 38.3 35.7 21,060 25,345 2B-i\\A r:r:,i:-r::-NE NORTHEAST ARKANSA158 2 692 3 005 2 226 2 369 152.5 151.4 23 495 27,217 1.62.7 162.6 24,277 28,050 45-01 MARION FLIPPIN 159 2 691 3 103 741 781 48.0 49.0 24,145 28,048 51.0 52.3 25,200 29,180 72-01 WASHINGTON ELKINS 160 2 691 3 336 683 722 45.4 46.4 22,933 28,969 48.4 49.4 23,955 29,881 Ai\\ .. I\\? I TNrnt N GRADY 161 2 687 3 435 324 335 21.8 22.7 18 717 24,072 24.8 24.7 19,736 25,212 05-01 BOONE ALPENA 162 2 686 3 100 461 482 30.7 31.6 22,765 25,947 33.7 34.6 23,985 27,353 H,-nc\nrDATf':.MEAD BUFFALO ISLAND CE163 2 685 3 025 784 814 59.0 59.0 21,348 24,708 63.8 63.8 22,079 25,468 ii,,\"\"' - - H ,~w~ 164 2 685 3 007 4 523 4 770 309.4 301.4 25 478 29 486 329.3 320.4 26,346 30,350 16-01 CRAIGHEAD BAY-BROWN 165 2 683 3 073 619 648 42.7 42.7 21,575 25,787 45.7 45.7 22,513 26,912 15-05 CONWAY WONDERVIEW 166 2 678 2 980 419 437 30.1 30.1 19,889 23,297 33.1 33.1 21,173 24,324 ,.,L_,07 r-..,....,,, ..a. 1\"\"' Mnr 1NT6TN PTNE 1.\u0026lt;.7 '\u0026gt; 678 2 979 583 622 43.5 43.5 21 482 25,103 46.5 46.5 22,679 26,242 17-03 CRAWFORD MOUNTAINBURG 168 2 676 3 105 759 813 53.0 54.0 23,099 26,583 57.0 58.0 23,966 27,267 32-01 INDEPENDENCE BATESVILLE 169 2 672 2 932 2 335 2,458 157.0 158.5 25,114 27,967 168.3 169.8 25,851 28,778 4'?- ,O? MTq!::J!::!::TPPT '\" YTMr::-VT c - f70 2 672 3 020 4 069 4 328 277.9 277.6 23,797 27,561 296.0 295.7 24,866 28,693 14-06 COLUMBIA WALDO 171 2 669 3 114 532 569 39.9 41.1 21,170 24,450 42.8 44.1 22,602 25,712 15-03 CONWAY NEMO VISTA 172 2 669 3 091 380 399 29.0 31.0 20,393 22,671 32.0 34.0 21,360 22,970 A-Z-i\\\"Z I rn.inllr::- rADI TSLr::- 173 2 668 2 961 669 696 48.2 47.7 22. 134 25,0ii 51.i 50.7 23,184 26,163 56-04 POINSETT MARKED TREE 174 2 668 2 942 847 894 64.5 64.0 20,983 24,052 68.0 67.5 21,675 24,759 70-08 UNION SMACKOVER 175 2 668 2,930 800 837 so.a 52.4 23,765 27,066 54.8 56.4 24,945 28,160 ~ 1. .nA unLIARD MINERAL SPRINGS 176 2 663 2 955 476 496 37.2 37.0 20,904 23,595 40.7 40.7 22,250 25,104 49-01 MONTGOMERY CADDO HILLS 177 2 661 2 901 522 549 38.0 38.3 21,664 24,400 41.0 41.3 22,848 25,855 04-07 BENTON PEA RIDGE 178 2,659 3 153 679 720 51.1 52.5 20,828 24,170 54.2 55 .. 5 21,783 25,149 \"Z\"Z-01. T\"7.0.D1' CALICO ROCK 179 2 657 3 291 435 457 34.1 36.6 20 404 23,314 37.i 39.6 21,508 24,523 56-05 POINSETT TRUMANN 180 2 655 2,939 1,568 1,673 115.1 111.9 21,395 25,291 124.8 120.6 22,393 26,245 07-01 CALHOUN HAMPTON 181 2,654 3,099 879 910 58.8 60.2 23,248 27,539 62.3 63.7 24,437 28,466 47-12 MISSISSIPPI MANILA 182 2 652 2 943 853 905 57.4 56.8 21,794 24,954 62.2 61.6 22,779 25,790 29-06 HEMPSTEAD SPRING HILL 183 2,651 3,133 294 307 22.0 22.0 19,606 24,774 25.0 25.0 20,921 26,217 58-03 POPE HECTOR 184 2,650 3,051 633 667 46.0 47.0 22,406 25,015 49.0 50.0 23,133 25,924 62-01 ST FRANCIS FORREST CITY 185 2 649 2 870 4 896 5 177 296.6 299.2 23,470 26,789 330.1 332.7 24,587 27,705 74-01 WOODRUFF AUGUSTA 186 2 649 3 108 639 673 46.2 46.2 20,958 23,980 49.2 49.2 22,297 25,414 52-04 OUACHITA FAIRVIEW 187 2 648 3,045 3,910 4,086 261.3 253.8 24,070 28,414 280 .. 2 273.8 25,136 29,537 A..C:::-1'\\? ~..oi.g,ry MARSHALL 188 2 646 2 965 697 736 50.5 51.5 21,313 24,246 53.5 54.5 22,120 24,725 17-04 JEFFERSON MISSISSIPPI 1 B NE 0 BENTON 25-02 FULTON 46 H L ER 73-03 WHITE 73-06 WHITE 04-04 BENTON 57-05 POLK 09-03 CHICOT 4- s 36-06 JOHNSON 10-02 CLARK 22-02 DREW 37-03 LAFAYETTE 15-07 CONWAY 12- B RNE 70-06 UNION 75-04 YELL 7 -03 NIN 72-08 WASHINGTON 02-01 ASHLEY 17-02 CRAWFORD 18-03 CRITTENDEN 73-11 WHITE 32-09 INDEPENDENCE 75-03 YELL 41-01 LITTLE RIVER 10-03 CLARK 16-11 CRAIGHEAD 26-06 GARLAND 40-01 LINCOLN 06-01 BRADLEY 50-06 NEVADA 63-04 SALINE 52-05 OUACHITA 56-02 POINSETT 58-01 POPE 24-02 FRANKLIN 05-02 BOONE 43-02 LONOKE ARKANSAPSU BLICS CHOOLD ISTRICTS ANNUAFLI SCAL REPORTA NALYSIS MULBERRY ROGERS SALEH 0 KE BRADFORD JUDSONIA GRA TT WICKES LAKESIDE WEST SIDE ARK DRE ST NORPHLET DARDANELLE T WEST FORK CROSSETT CEDARV LL WEST MEMPHIS SEARCY SOUTH SID DANVILLE 221 ASHDOWN 222 GURDON 223 NETTLETON 224 LAKESIDE 225 GOULD 226 HERMITAGE 227 PRESCOTT 228 HARMONY GROVE 229 HARMONY GROVE 230 HARRISBURG 231 ATKINS 232 CHARLESTON 233 BERGMAN 234 ENGLAND 235 COLUMN 1 RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER EXPENSE i99O 91 PER ADA 90-91 91-92 A/D/A A/D/H 415 439 2,581 2,853 526 555 2,580 2,901 2,068 2,173 2 574 2 9 1 88 2,572 2,909 1,539 1,638 2,572 2,901 2,081 2L188 2 571 2 980 323 341 2,568 2,972 589 624 2,567 2,862 1,162 1,210 2 564 3 033 591 618 2,563 3,038 760 788 2,563 2,811 916 976 2 561 2 867 1 035 1 097 2,560 2,969 678 702 2,559 3,029 665 694 2 559 2 842 1 016 1 068 NUMBEOR F TEACHERS K-12 90-91 91-92 AVG. SLRY, TCHRS_. K-12 90-91 91-92 33.1 33.2 2L__716 ~6 38.6 38.6 21,581 2!:l,063 133.0 136.3 23,207 ~828 4 102.5 110.1 22,004 24,966 126.9 129.0 24,051 27,798 25.8 26 0 8 021 20 888 40.0 41.0 84.3 83.3 38. 41.5 48.5 49.5 22,977 65.0 63.8 21,791 24,279 70.0 70.0 23 930 27 570 47.0 49.0 22,853 25,850 42.2 46.1 23,322 26,319 71.5 71.0 22 834 25 794 --- NO. OF CERT. PERSONNEL 90-91 91-92 36.4 41.6 41.6 144.5 147.5 111.3 118.5 136.9 139.0 28.8 29.0 43.0 44.0 91.3 90.2 .5 44.5 51.5 52.5 69.0 67.8 75.0 75.0 50.0 52.0 45.3 49.2 76.5 76,0 PAGE_NO. 14 SLBY, PERS. ~~~- 91-92 22_,_664 26,117 24_,229~4 22,963 25,949 24,950 28,866 19 04 22 0 7 22 304 24 951 22 078 25 149 4 335 27 102 23 926 27 902 22,612 25 086 24 663 28 238 23 825 26 923 24 596 27 627 23 881 26 957 aats:atitsasE :IU H IC SCf:::fCDI 12ISIBICIS at!lt!lll9L EISCaL BEE:IJBI0 N0LYl\u0026gt;Ilii _(\nIJLUMN 1 _RANKED IN DESCENDIN!i ORDE PAGE NO. 15 0\\ll.. SI.BY. tlQ. QE CERI. 6\\l!i. SI.Bl, TCHRS. K-12 PERSONNEL CERT. PERS. l'll'.JU'.l'I 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 9 10 11 12 001 26 48.0 51.0 25,738 27 432 71 28 144.5 148.0 25 273 29 350 599 24 62.0 60.5 21 467 25,059 950 23 35.6 36.4 22 255 24,967 1 989 26 2 47.6 48.6 22 884 26 925 20,387 23,000 76.0 76.7 21 078 23,844 23~26 26,225 68.8 73.4 24,414 27,141 20 6'-'B 23 358 33.5 33.0 21 726 24 607 1'IL._931 22 201 33.6 33.0 21,164 23,629 23,866 27,882 56.6 58.0 24,795 28,992 5 1 4 29 489 142.7 140.5 25 935 30 398 18,369 21,333 33.5 33.5 19,708 22,522 23,340 26 548 64.0 68.3 24,204 27,317 23 BOB 27 357 195.1 192.4 24,802 28 442 205.8 23,683 27,554 219.4 225.7 24,622 28,534 37.6 20,885 24,402 40.6 44.2 21,812 25,194 142.1 25 396 28 836 150.1 156.6 26 332 29,770 109.2 110.2 23,172 26 948 116.5 117.6 24,028 27,762 35.0 35.3 20,890 ~. 838 38.0 38.3 22,093 25,078 91.9 92.3 22 897 26 320 100.6 102.0 24,005 27,384 341.0 353.3 25,116 28,704 366.5 384.5 26,175 29,841 42.0 42. 0 J.'l, 908 24, 849 45.4 45.4 21,299 26,412 3 .o 38.0 21 604 25 605 42.0 41.0 22 544 26 692 74.3 73.0 24 145 26 991 79.3 78.0 25,129 28,122 85.5 87.5 22,725 25,873 91.9 93.8 23,698 26,926 73.9 75.6 24 567 29 031 80.4 81.1 25,796 30,124 66-05 SEBASTIAN LAVACA 761 50.5 51.6 20,793 23,340 53.5 54.6 21,850 24,201 05-05 BOONE VALLEY SPRINGS 805 50.5 50.5 23,320 27,812 54.5 54.5 24,117 28,609 MENA 4 7 1 1 786 111.5 113.5 24,930 28,810 117.9 120.0 25,675 29,642 18-04 CRITTENDEN MARION 265 4 50 2,317 2,469 143.0 145.0 24,102 28,037 154.8 156.8 25,111 29,200 44-01 MADISON HUNTSVILLE 266 4 08 1,566 1,666 104.6 105.9 22,473 27,092 109.6 110.9 23,110 27,761 AD DIERKS 2 866 573 596 39.2 40.2 21,712 26,081 42.2 43.2 22,765 26,821 53-03 PERRY PERRYVILLE 041 807 848 50.9 53.5 22,719 26,790 53.9 56.5 23,797 27,602 28-03 GREENE MARMADUKE ,767 629 658 40.6 40.6 23,344 27,541 43.6 43.6 24,381 28,290 BENTON 907 3 834 4 020 239.8 243.0 23,854 27,888 254 .. 8 258.0 24,780 28,915 BENTONVILLE ,909 3,987 4,171 260.3 261.8 22,592 26,723 274.8 282.3 23,719 28,087 NORFORK ,895 451 472 31.3 35.0 20,188 22,283 34.3 38.0 21,517 23,494 L 884 470 504 36.3 37.3 19,697 21,984 39.3 40.3 20,802 23,355 STUTTGART ,796 2,304 2,437 152.2 149.9 22,802 27,051 162.1 159.8 23,728 27,988 HOPE ,811 2,978 3,133 178.5 181.5 24,433 28,485 190.5 193.5 25,485 29,512 944 1 300 1 382 89.5 91.5 22 139 26 271 94.9 97.2 22,990 27,210 MONTICELLO ,882 2,096 2,183 138.1 138.4 22,363 26,295 150.1 150.3 23,590 27,577 WARREN ,809 1,733 1,818 114.6 116.5 23,100 25,869 124.5 126.5 24,570 27,468 W ST SIDE 839 1 229 1 310 81.B 82.1 21,231 24,726 89.B 90.1 22,227 25,797 52-01 BEARDEN ,884 855 887 55.5 55 .. 5 22,887 28,382 60.5 60.5 24,258 29,298 38-08 WALNUT RIDGE ,871 852 899 62.0 61.1 20,867 25,353 66.0 65.1 21,649 26,249 - 4 CENTR L 2 818 503 529 37.3 37.3 20,620 24,579 39.B 39.8 21,704 25,576 ---- - --- ---- - --- ------------- ARKANSAPSU BLIC SCHOOLD ISTRICTS ANNUALFI SCAL REPORTA NALYSIS COLUMN1 RANKEDIN DESCENDINGO RDER PAGE NO. 16 CRAIGHEAD I/ALLEY 1/IEW CRAWFORD I/AN BUREN SHARP HIG LAN CLAY ___ PIGGOTT SEI/IER DEQUEEN WASHINGTON GREEN D 28-=-0LGREEl-lE GREENE COUNTY 48-01 MONROE BRINKLEY 43-01 LONOKE LONOKE 61-03 RANDOLPH POCAHONTAS 36-04 JOHNSON LAMAR 17-01 CRAWFORD ALMA 13-03 CL El/ELAND RISON __ 36-01 JOHNSON CLARKS I/ILLE 74-03 WOODRUFF MCCRORY ,,~ 74 30-04 HOT SPRING MALI/ERN 2 690 174.5 22,021 25,604 183.0 183.0 22,732 26,362 21-05 DESHA MCGEHEE 3 2 _619 __L_227 1,276 79.5 22,334 25,180 84.5 86.0 23,200 26,226 23-05 FAULKNER MAYFLOWER 314 2 356 2 883 667 701 44.5 21 680 25 128 47.5 50.0 22 604 26 05 69-01 STONE MOUNTAIN 1/IEW 315 2,635 i,036 i,084 65.0 23,596 27,042 69.0 69.0 24,492 27,986 23-03 FAULKNER GREENBRIE_R_ 316 2_,902 1,505 1,586 87.5 24,801 27,934 93.5 104.5 25,713 28,921 05-03 BOONE HARRISON 317 2 673 2 504 2 618 152.4 154.3 22 991 26 373 163 3 165.2 23 976 27 642 73-02 WHITE BEEBE 318 2,763 1_, 575 i,670 103.4 106.7 21,807 26,192 109.6 113.9 22,683 26,867 59-01 PRAIRIE DES ARC 319 2,791 642 676 40.7 41.9 21,648 25,241 43.8 45.0 22,547 26,125 14-02 COLUMBIA MAGNOLIA 320 2 667 2 967 3 130 175.9 174.5 24 035 28 255 189.0 186.6 25 024 29 245 63-03 SALINE BRYANT 321 2,722 4,903 5~216 286.6 292.6 25,815 30,085 301.5 309.5 26,520 30,875 43-(),4 LONOKE CABOT 322 2,235 2,759 4_, 542 4,832 264.5 285.0 24,371 28,136 281.0 302.0 25,307 29,048 08-01 CARROLL BERRYVILLE 323 2 231 2,610 1,331 1 393 84.0 88.0 21 773 25 257 B8.0 92.0 22 371 25 847 67-03 SEI/IER HORATIO 324 2,207 2,852 520 __ 544 31.8 35.6 21,758 27,490 34.7 38.6 23,187 28,360 -------------~-\"'-'\"===--=-========:-:_::.::.::.::.::.::.::.::.::.::.::.~=-::.=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--:..=-=-=--------======------------------------------~  ARKANSASP UBLIC SCHOOLD ISTRICTS ANNUALF ISCAi REPORTA NALYSIS COLUMN 2 RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER PAGE NO. 17 EXPENSE 1990-91 NUMBERO E AY!i, SLRY, NO. OE CERT. AY!i, SLRY, PER ~DA TEACHERS K-12 TCHRS. K-12 PERSONNEL CERT. PERS. 90-91 91-92 A/D/A A/D/M 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 I C'6 ~ r-nuNTY DISTRICT \"'\"\"'\" 1 ? 3 4 5 6 7 A 9 10 11 1? ~ 2.1..-.0, _1 ,..,D ESHA ARKANSAS CITY 1 6., 165 ~6,609 145 152 18.2 17.0 22,727 23,780 20.7 19.5 25,110 26,262 - \"'\"'w\"\"'\" 2 5 '.'J:A.4 c\nA?:\u0026gt;: 711 742 70.0 70 1 28 616 '.18 774 7c\n-.: 7\"\n4 ?9 AOc\n?9 Lb.A 65-04 SEARCY WITTS SPRINGS 3 5_.i293 5,726 94 99 14.8 14.8 18,050 20,234 16.8 16.8 19,145 21.,278 31-06 HOWARD UMPIRE 4 4_, 781 5,471 123 127 14.9 15.6 20,349 22,369 17.a__ 18.5 22,124 24,559 ..,  .r,. \"A B' ~-~ AO C.~An \"\" A O\"\u0026gt;A c\n?\"?(\\ o-. QQ 13 1 13 1 19 780 ?1 C:f\\'') 1 \"i ? 1 ~ '.'J: ?1 \"\u0026gt;L? ,., ... 1 ...... 75-05 YELL FOURCHE VALLEY 6 4,346 5., 125 128 136 16.4 18.2 19,128 22,348 18.4 20.2 20,494 23,349 70-05 UNION MOUNT HOLLY 7 4_,294 5,081 212 224 21 .. S 24.3 22,745 23,644 23.5 2'7 .. 0 24,093 25_, 146 60-01 PULASKI LITTLE ROCK 8 4 296 4 765 22 397 24 090 1 822.0 1 839.3 28 205 31 371 1 970.0 1 986.3 29 510 32 960 03-06 BAXTER TRI-COUNTY CON. 9 4,809 4,762 151 159 18.3 13.8 20,313 23,402 20.3 16.3 21,378 25,052 63-06 SALINE PARON 10 3,994 4,366 215 229 19.4 19.5 22,320 26,619 21.4 21 .. 5 23,368 27,371 47-01 MISSISSIPPI ARMOREL 11 3 850 4 344 218 232 21.4 21.8 22 820 26 179 23.4 23.8 24 056 27 587 36-05 JOHNSON DARK 12 4,027 4,242 150 158 16.9 17.9 19,417 21,674 18.9 19.9 20,721 23,160 53-02 PERRY PERRY CASA 13 4,405 4,182 167 184 19.2 15.7 23,028 24,809 21 .. 2 17.7 24,200 26,192 65-03 SEARCY SAINT JOE 14 3 678 4 116 202 214 19.5 19.5 19 352 23 262 21.5 21.5 20 761 24 499 71-03 VAN BUREN SCOTLAND 15 3,655 4,078 130 135 14.0 14 .. 5 19,973 21,899 16.0 16.5 21,154 23,335 12-05 CLEBURNE WILBURN 16 3,041 3,911 164 177 14.2 15.4 18,682 22,473 16.2 17.4 21,181 25,723 69-02 STONE STONE COUNTY 17 3 162 3 898 223 234 18.5 18.8 20 093 26 395 20 .. 5 20.8 21 104 26 885 38-07 LAWRENCE STRAWBERRY 18 3,432 3,885 216 224 21.2 21.0 20,052 21,645 23 .. 2 23.4 21,372 23,288 32-03 INDEPENDENCE CUSHMAN 19 3,235 3,814 271 286 22.9 24.8 21,442 24,645 25.4 27 .. 3 22,633 25,939 38 05 LAWRENCE LYNN 20 3 281 3 810 228 237 20.0 20.9 20 890 23 520 22.2 23.4 21 718 24 418 24-05 FRANKLIN PLEASANT VIEW 21 3,528 3,790 227 240 22.0 22.5 18,844 20,650 24.0 24.5 20,113 22,059 14-01 COLUMBIA EMERSON 22 3,554 3,788 341 354 30.6 27.1 23,895 2l\u0026gt;,812 33.6 30.1 25,319 28,474 27-03 GRANT POYEN 23 3 036 3 753 242 250 18.0 19.0 22 841 26 009 20.0 21.0 24,385 27i592 41-03 LITTLE RIVER WINTHROP 24 3,675 3,738 169 176 14.6 14.6 20,966 23,019 16.6 16.6 22,339 24,477 43-05 LONOKE HUMNOKE 25 3,647 3,727 169 180 15.8 17.1 18,729 19,880 17.8 19.1 19,963 21,024 20-01 DALLAS CARTHAGE 26 3 483 3 725 165 172 17.5 17 ...5 19 528 21 383 19.5 19.5 20 894 22 722 51-03 NEWTON MOUNT JUDEA 27 3,277 3,706 236 252 19.6 19.1 20,764 25,272 21.6 21.1 21,943 26,052 01-02 ARKANSAS GILLETT 28 3,174 3,705 278 288 23.6 24.6 20,081 21,921 26.5 27.5 21,637 23,436 49-04 MONTGOMERY ODEN 29 3 461 3 703 215 227 19 .. 5 19.5 22 264 24 224 21.5 21 .. s 23 121 25 446 60-02 PULASKI NORTH LITTLE ROCK 30 3,407 3,691 8,976 9,653 609.6 609.5 25,249 28,656 666.1 666.0 26,522 29,976 34-02 JACKSON GRUBBS 31 3,306 3,673 188 200 19.3 19.3 17,374 20,410 21.3 21.3 18,485 21,324 70-02 UNION HUTTIG 32 3 143 3 659 279 293 21.0 22 .. 0 22 776 25 112 23.0 24 .. 0 23 922 26 451 66-01 SEBASTIAN FORT SMITH 33 3,123 3,639 10,921 11,633 757.1 785.2 27,849 31,070 805.4 834.9 28,883 32,136 05-04 BOONE OMAHA 34 3,168 3,633 282 298 23.5 24.5 21,440 23,723 26.1 27.1 22,720 25,302 47-08 MISSISSIPPI GOSNELL 35 3 170 3 617 2 074 2 195 149.6 148.5 25 495 '\"\u0026gt;9 216 159.1 158.0 26 389 30 109 68-06 SHARP POUGHKEEPSIE 36 3,842 3,598 115 120 15.1 14.0 18,377 19,044 17.1 16.0 19,478 19,503 02-02 ASHLEY FOUNTAIN HILL 37 2,965 3,567 244 265 21.3 21.3 20,106 25,000 23.3 23.3 21,703 26,863 34-04 JACKSON SWIFTON 38 3 474 3 563 181 191 20.1 19.6 18 578 20 946 22.1 21.6 20 019 22 423 72-09 WASHINGTON WINSLOW 39 3,124 3,551 223 236 20.0 20.4 18,706 21,297 22.0 22.4 19,855 22,564 28-06 GREENE STANFORD 40 3,357 3.,548 194 201 20.1 20 .. 5 19,263 20,816 22 .. 4 22.8 20,131 21,694 05-06 BOONE LEAD HILL 41 3 202 3 529 329 347 27.5 27.8 19 972 23 130 30.3 30.6 21 469 24 467 46-01 MILLER BRIGHT STAR 42 2,952 3,529 248 259 17.0 18.0 22,656 27,552 19.0 20.0 23,707 28,742 33-03 IZARD MOUNT PLEASANT 43 3,213 3,518 265 274 24.6 24.5 22,182 24,694 26.6 26.5 21,885 24,298 19-03 CROSS PARKIN 44 2 736 3 509 554 591 42.0 42.3 20 121 23 897 45.0 45.3 21 520 25 407 28-01 GREENE DELAPLAINE 45 3,052 3,501 270 285 21.4 23 .. 2 21,828 24,835 24.1 25.4 22,888 25,892 56-07 POINSETT WEINER 46 2,963 3,482 378 395 30.5 32.6 20,459 23,390 32.5 __ 34.6 21,265 24,150 20-02 DALLAS FORDYCE 47 3 087 3 474 1 249 i 303 88.7 88.0 22 429 25 216 95.7 94.0 23 368 26 245 ARKANSAS PIIBI IC SCHOOi DISTRICTS ANNUAL FISCAL REPORT ANALYSIS COLUMN 2 RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER_ _ PAGE NO. 18 1990-91 NUMBER Of AVG, SLRY. NO. OF CERT. AVG. SLRY. TEACHE:RS K 12 TCHRS. K- 2 PERSONNEL CERT. PERS. ALDt:t:l 90-91_ 91-92 90-91 91 92 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 8 9 10 11 12 -04 25.5 21,847 24,396 1 454.3 28 667 28 830 30.3 19 005 22 269 24.8 24 .. 7 19,736 25,212 255.2 248.3 25 599 28 802 20.6 21.0 20,653 22,895 13.3 12.8 21,094 24 394 20.0 8 326 22 969 24.0 23.0 19 553 24 399 17.0 25 864 28 709 19.0 19.0 27,408 30,378 43.3 19,333 21,625 47.0 46.3 20,269 22,654 39.5 40.0 25 259 28 632 42.5 43.0 26 561 29,877 1,_,Jl95 135.8 139.4 21,763 25l354 144.2 147.8 22,764 26,449 60 326 25.1 25 .. 0 21,886 24,188 28.0 28.0 23,293 25,651 p I L 61 236 18.5 17.5 22 961 26 270 20.5 19 .. 5 23,989 26,960 YELL WESTERN YELL COLIN 62 3,360 385 35.0 32.7 20,116 22,233 38.0 35.7 21,124 23,393 SHARP EVENING SHADE 63 2,941 273 24.0 24.7 18,271 21,090 26.0 26.7 19,470 22,054 COD- HARLOTTE 64 2 892 259 19.7 20 .. 6 21 662 24,815 21.7 22 .. 6 23,106 26,223 44-02 MADISON KINGSTON 65 2,950 300 21.0 21.0 21,498 25,643 23.0 23.0 23,025 27,229 66-04 SEBASTIAN HARTFORD 2,910 470 36.5 36 .. 5 21,097 23,934 39.7 39.7 22,035 24,920 N 2 691 722 45.4 46.4 22 933 28 969 48.4 49.4 23,955 29,881 58-05 POPE RUSSELLVILLE 4,879 303.6 310.9 25,798 30,231 323.3 331.7 26,963 31,387 37-01 LAFAYETTE BRADLEY 469 37.5 37.5 20,120 22,799 40.5 40.5 21,422 24,132 151 13.0 12.0 19 106 23 854 15.0 14.0 20,489 25,302 JESSIEVILLE 593 41.7 41.7 27,093 27,444 44.7 45.7 28,196 27,999 RANDOLPH COUNTY 72 306 23.4 23.4 19,252 22,588 26.4 26.4 20,303 24,072 N N 73 899 62.5 62.5 24 393 27 180 67.0 67.0 25,672 28,428 46-02 HILLER GENOA CENTRAL 74 2 749 50.0 51.0 22,779 25,926 53.0 54.0 23,986 27,197 57-01 POLK ACORN 75~ 352 26.2 26.0 23,766 25,685 28.2 28.0 25,225 27,131 76 3 393 34.0 32.6 19 588 22 701 37.0 35.6 20,784 24,161 33-01 IZARD CALICO ROCK 77 2, 457 34.1 36.6 20,404 23,314 37.1 39.6 21,508 24,523 01-05 ARKANSAS HUMPHREY 78 2, 322 23.2 23.2 22,369 27,520 25 ...2 25 .. 2 23,329 28,487 SLOAN-HENDRIX 79 3 500 37.9 37.9 23,187 25,777 40.9 40.9 24,489 26,889 51-04 NEWTON WESTERN GROVE 80 2, 283 21.1 21.4 20,175 23,780 23.2 23 .. 5 21,487 24,766 POLK HATFIELD 81 3, 299 24.0 23 .. 6 20,080 24,073 26.8 26.4 21,186 25,151 0 VAN COVE 82 2 9 375 30.3 31.3 20,563 22,727 33.3 34.3 21,814 23,885 SHARP WILLIFORD 83 271 22 .. 0 22 .. 5 19,234 21,649 24.5 25 .. 0 20,713 22,744 COLUMBIA ___ MCNEIL 84 349 25 .. 6 26.1 18,335 20,566 28.6 29.1 19,594 21,573 ,y EAST END 85 523 36.5 37.0 20 819 25 861 39.3 39.9 21,980 26,889 73-07 WHITE KENSETT 86 504 34.0 89.2 23,050 25,802 37.0 97 .. 2 24,554 27,032 64-01 SCOTT WALDRON 87 1,511 109.1 108.5 21,944 24,952 115.3 115.3 22,658 25,840 JEF R ON PINE BLUFF 88 2 97 7 518 459.3 459.0 26,811 29,916 491.0 491.5 27,755 30,847 02-04 ASHLEY PARKDALE 89 3 152 14.7 12.8 17,735 20,021 16.7 14.8 17,592 19,567 18-05 CRITTENDEN TURRELL 90 2, 524 34.8 33.7 21,691 25,393 38.1 36.7 23,150 26,894 4- UH A WALKER 91 2 242 21 .. 5 20.7 18 985 21,790 24.0 23 .. 2 20,496 23,078 25-01 FULTON MAMMOTHS PRING 92 451 33.8 34.5 22,569 25,325 36.3 37.0 23,751 26,288 MARION MARION CO 93 286 303 22.7 19.7 21,032 25,791 24.7 21.7 22,218 26,553 NEWTON DEER 94 335 357 25.8 25.0 20,967 24,243 27.8 27.0 22,098 25,454 - - -~~~ ------~----~~---------------------------------------------- 72-07 WASHINGTON 54::02 Pl:iILLIPS 73-10 WHITE 41-02 LITTLE RIVER 33-06 IZARD 46-05 HILLER 62-02 72-03 4-0 15-07 01-01 74- 1 23-06 17-03 ST FRANCIS WASHINGTON CONWAY ARKANSAS F FAULKNER CRAWFORD OS-01 BOONE 07-01 CALHOUN 15-03 CONWAY 24-03 FRANKLIN_ _ ARKANSAS PIIBI IC SCHOOi DISTRICTS ANNUAL FISCAL REPORT ANALYSIS SPRINGDALE ELAINE ROSE BUD FOREMAN IZARD CO CONSOL 124 TEXARKANA 125 SIDE 126 HUGHES 127 FAYETTEVILLE 128 LDO 129 SO. CONWAY CO. 130 DEWITT 131 AUGUSTA 132 MOUNT VERNON/ENOL133 MOUNTAINBURG 134 F PIN 135 ALPENA 136 HAMPTON 137 11 NT IDA 138 NEHO VISTA 139 COUNTY LINE 140 T N HOME 141 ~ IN DESCENDING ORDER PAGE N0.1_9 2,451 1,317 639 232 759 741 461 879 504 380 --l--=~~'--l--~555 3 268 2,773 448 553 5,757 431 1,099 6,328 569 2,595 1,378 673 242 813 781 482 910 524 399 588 3 451 442.0 53.0 44.2 37.8 43.6 26.0 26.6 41.0 52.5 32.6 34.5 8 8 449.5 54.0 43.3 39.3 42.6 26.0 19,060 21,556 21,651 25,244 20 828 24 170 23,203 25,593 21,487 24,342 21 655 23 710 26 365 30 062 20,938 23,921 22 202 25 552 21,773 24,722 21,414 24,109 21 169 23 497 NO. Of CERT. AVG. SLRY. 42.5 43.0 20 999 23 696 32.3 32.3 20,678 23,210 45.5 46.2 22,839 25,689 46.8 43.8 23 713 27 300 3~9~~1~_~40.4 20,873 23,007 ~4~6~~_9_ ~45.0 22,112 24,778 46.0 47.3 22 285 28 225 ~3~0~_-__1 29.6 20,755 23,048~--- _46~_3_ __ 4_4.0 22,515 26,101 54.2 55.5 21 783 25,149 34.5 35.6 24,180 26,545 ____ _ 36.5 37.5 22,379 25,25~9 ___ _ 41.6 41.8 22 844 25 101 477.0 485.5 27,504 31~,2~4___4_ _ _ 56.6 56.6 21,778 25,04~3 ___ _ 47.2 46.3 23,310 26 761 40.8 42.3 22,973 25,683 46.6 45.6 22,450 25, 103 ___ _ 29.0 29.0 22,615 25,088 24.3 __ ~2~3~.4 20,340 23,265 26.3 25.4 21,519 24,554 39.4 40.4 19,907 22,626 42.4 43.4 20,893 23,65=5 ___ _ 60.7 60.0 20 372 23 814 65.8 65.2 21,367 24,893 1 20 2 3~ 10 2 ~3- 0 5 2 19 3' 6 103 6 2 2! 7 ~ 4 0 20 25 0. 0 0 2 20 5 0. 0 0 2 24', 92 2 52 1 22 6 6',0 2 -6 1 - 7 ....  . ..,,4., 7---- 31.7 32.5 20 652 25 688 34.7 35.5 21,592 26,620 37.6 41.2 20,885 24,402 40.6 44.2 21,812 25,19~4 ___ _ 384.3 389.5 23,949 27,352 410.6 416.8 24,953 28,2~9~3~--- 33.0 33.0 21 490 23 696 35.5 36.0 22,060 24,517 75.5 76.5 22,664 25,381 83.4 84.3 23,741 26,598 394.1 404.9 27,172 30,441 416.6 426.9 27~1.~1='6~0~--- 39.9 41.1 21 170 24,450 42.8 44.1 22,602 25,712 153. 0 155. 0 23, 250-2=-0-==-5-'=--9, =7--1-6=5\"'.-=0-----c1---c6cc7c-'.-=9-2c-'4c-',-_c-2_=-_--6 _'--c-3_=--_- -,2',-'9c--',~92.7 94.7 23,157 26,141 ~9=8~=9---=--101.1 24,016 27,140 46.2 46.2 20,958 23,980 49.2 49.2 22,297 25,414 19.6 28.5 19,134 21,461 -=2~1c-'.-c6c-_31.5 20,027 22,230 53.0 54.0 23,099 26,583 57.0 58.0 23,966 27,267 48.o 49.o 24,145 20 040 -\"\"'5='1~.\"\"'o--s2.3 2s,200 29,100 30.7 31.6 22,765 25,947 33.7 34.6 23,985 27,353 58.8 60.2 23,248 27,539 -6=2-.=3-- 63.7 24,437 28,4~6~6 ___ _ 37.5 36.8 21,840 25,827 40.5 39.B 23,040 27,137 29.0 31.0 20,393 22,671 32.0 34.0 21,360 22,97_0 ___ _ 44.3 40.7 19,945 24,416 47.3 43.7 20,761 25,269 194.9 199.8 24,400 28,162 210.4 216.4 25,607 29,31~0---- ------------------------- - - - - -- - - --------------------- ARKANSAPSU BLIC SCHOOLD ISTRICTS ANNUAFLI SCAL REPORTA NALYSIS COLUMN 2 RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER PAGE NC. 20 EXPENSE 1990-91 NUMBEORF PER ADA TEACJ::IERS K-12 90-91 91-92 A/D/A A/D/M 90-91 91-92 13-01 CLEVELAND KINGSLAND 16-01 CRAIGHEAD BAY-BROWN 144 65-01 SEARCY LESLIE 145 17-04 CRAWFORD MULBERRY 146 66-06 SEBASTIAN MANSFIELD 147 71-04 \\/AN BUREN SHIRLEY 148 74-02 WOOD UFF COTTON PLANT 49 58-03 POPE HECTOR 150 70-01 UNION EL DORADO 151 4.,_824 5,110 25-03 FULTON \\/IOLA 152 398 4 5 52-04 OUACHITA FAIRVIEW 153 2,648 3,045 3_,910 4,086 253.8 24__,070 28_,_414 280.2 273.8 25, 136 2~ 53]' 53-03 PERRY PERRYVILLE 154 2,489 3,041 807 848 53.5 22,719 2~90 53.9 56.5 23, 797 27_,_6 02 75-08 YELL PLAINVIEW-ROVER 155 2 928 3 041 320 337 26 .. 8 24.9 18 969 21 888 29.8 26.9 20 212 23 100 52-05 OUACHITA HARMONY GROVE 156 2,563 3,038 760 788 48.5 49.5 22,977 26_1_960 51.5 52.5 2~926 27 J 902 35-09 JEFFERSON WATSON CHAPEL 157 .2,637 3,034 3,327 3,479 209.6 211.6 26,185 29A67 225.6 227.6 27 328 30 753_ _ 63-04 SALINE HARMONY GROVE 158 2 564 3 033 591 618 38.5 41.5 23 31 25 728 41.5 44.5 24 335 27 102 20-03 DALLAS SPARKMAN 159 2,888 3,031 345 362 28.5 26.1 19,954 23_.__089 30.5 28.1 2~92 24.,_ 850 50-08 NEVADA NEVADA COUNTY 160 2,638 3,031 692 731 48.1 49.0 21_, 590 24L755 51.1 52.0 22,489 25,675 73-01 WHITE BALD KNOB 161 2 701 3 0 1 3 2 1 397 86.4 84.8 22 921 26 642 91.9 90.9 23 756 27 616 05-02 BOONE BERGMAN 162 2,559 3,029 665 694 42.2 46.1 23,322 26.,_\n319 45.3 49.2 24,596 27,6'2\n1__ 23-07 FAULKNER VILONIA 163 2,455 3,029 1,542 1,614 97.0 101.0 23,538 2I.,_5\u0026gt;80 104.0 109.0 24,352 28L878 16-13 CRAIGHEAD RIVERSIDE 164 2 873 3 028 786 820 59.0 56.0 21 364 23 937 63.0 60.0 22 383 25 126 16-05 CRAIGHEAD BUFFALO ISLAND CE165 2,685 3,025 784 814 59.0 59.0 21,348 24,708 63.8 63.8 22,079 25_, 468 10-02 CLARK ARKADELPHIA 166 2,614 3,022 2,181 2,267 145.9 148.9 22,384 26,027 155.8 159.3 23 d_04~122 35-02 JEFFERSON DOLLARWAY 167 2 773 3 021 1 892 1 989 13 .o 13 .o 23 238 26 60 141.5 40.3 24 196 27 241 47-02 MISSISSIPPI BLYTHEVILLE 168 2,672 3,020 4,069 4,328 277.9 277.6 23,797 27,561 296.0 295.7 24_, 866 28, 693 23-01 FAULKNER CONWAY 169 2,505 3,019 5,479 5,734 341.0 353.3 25,116 28,704 366.5 384.5 26,175 29,841 45-02 MARION YELLVILLE-SUMMIT 170 2 736 3 017 791 832 55.0 57.6 21 660 24 347 58.0 61.1 22 574 25 422 57-05 POLK WICKES 171 2,621 3,016 451 475 30.0 30.6 22,692 25,760 32.5 33.1 24,108 26,918 48-02 MONROE CLARENDON 172 2,504 3,013 606 637 42.0 42.0 19,908 24,849 45.4 45.4 21,299 26,412 09-02 CHICOT EUDORA 173 2 867 3 012 925 966 66.5 59.8 21 804 25 099 72.6 64.9 23 193 26 462 52-06 OUACHITA STEPHENS 174 2,751 3,008 502 519 35.0 35.0 22,436 25,768 38.0 38.0 23,562 26,678 16-08 CRAIGHEAD JONESBORO 175 2,685 3,007 4,523 4,770 309.4 301.4 25,478 29,486 329.3 320.4 26_, 346 30, 350 30-01 HOT SPRING BISMARCK 176 2 427 3 006 778 812 48.3 52.0 23 170 27 850 51.3 55.0 24 117 28 803 28-08 GREENE NORTHEAST ARKANSA177 2,692 3,005 2,226 2,369 152.5 151.4 23,495 27,217 162.7 162.6 24,277 28,050 70-07 UNION PARKERS CHAPEL 178 2,549 3,004 618 643 44.6 45.6 21,989 26,020 47.6 48.6 22,884 26,9~ 32-11 INDEPENDENCE MIDLAND 179 2 697 3 003 582 618 44.4 45.2 21 141 24 131 47.4 48.2 22 099 25 254 59-02 PRAIRIE DE\\IALLS BLUFF 180 2,693 3,003 458 477 35.5 32.9 19,993 24,202 38.3 35.7 21_,060 25_L3~ 73-08 WHITE MCRAE 181 2,640 3,003 306 323 25.1 25.4 19,335 22,501 27.5 27.5 20,353 23,453 32-09 INDEPENDENCE SOUTH SIDE 182 2 586 3 002 1 039 1 103 69.7 73.0 22 643 26 433 76.0 80.0 23 544 27 356 72-02 WASHINGTON FARMINGTON 183 2,447 3,001 1,038 1,096 67.8 70.6 21,545 26 400 72.6 ~3 22,619 ..[,459 04-05 BENTON ROGERS 184 2,634 2,998 6,179 6,511 358.5 375.3 26,969 30,889 386.6 403.4 28 108 32 060 26-01 GARLAND CUTTER-MORNING ST185 2 801 2 997 483 514 36.2 33.7 22 585 26 780 39.2 36.7 23 777 27 874 47-13 MISSISSIPPI OSCEOLA 186 2,636 2,993 2,094 2,213 141.8 142.0 24,131 28,054 150.2 152.4 24,940 28 895 46-03 HILLER FOUKE 187 2,627 2,990 755 797 51.7 52 .. 7 22,384 26,159 54.7 55.7 23,111 26 870 04-06 BENTON SILOAM SPRINGS 188 2 553 2 989 2 149 2 273 133.S 137.0 24 0-71 28 077 144.5 148.0 25 273 29 350 65-02 SEARCY 43-03 LONOKE 72-08 WASHINGTON 31-04 HOWARD 18-04 CRITTENDEN 22-02 DREW 27-05 GRANT 56-05 POINSETT 73-11 72-06 WASHINGTON 34-03 JACKSON 02-01 ASHLEY 62-05 ST FRANCIS 33-02 IZARD 04-01 BENTON ARKANSASP fJRtI C SCHQQl DISTRICTS ANNIJALF ISCAL REPORTA NALYSIS COLUMN2 . RANKEDI N DESCENDINGO RDER PAGE NO. 2 1990-91 NUMBER OF AYG, SLRY, NO, OF CERT, AVG. SLRY. MARSHALL CARLISLE LINCOLN WEST FORK MINERAL SPRINGS MARION DREW CENTRAL 204 205 206 207 2 8 209 210 GROVE 227 228 9 CROSSETT 230 PALESTINE/WHEATLE231 C 232 2 542 MELBOURNE 233~513 BENTONVILLE 234 2,487 ON 235 2 572 43.5 969 _____L___QJ,._782 .0 950 998 60.0 1L216 1 310 86.3 589 624 40.0 304 323 26.6 678 702 47.0 748 ~7~8~2,___54.7 823 870 57.S 697 736 50.5 669 696 48.2 929 987 65.4 894 932 61.4 476 496 37.2 518 547 37.6 2,317 1,023 9 5 960 1,300 1 690 1,013 2,469 143.0 1,064 70.2 1 033 68.0 998 58.5 1,_,382 89.5 1 771 109.2 _,9_,0'--\"S'-5- -7-  4 894 64.5 5 866 385.5 3,459 205.8 1,673 115.1 672 47.8 3,032 181.2 2,458 157.0 657 44.4 547 39.0 837 50.8 1 786 111.5 1,070 63.8 2,252 134.2 921 65.5 2,788 185.7 681 48.0 395 30.5 490 35.0 4,171 260.3 1 638 102.5 25 103 46.5 23 000 76.0 26 548 64.0 23,497 92.3 23,910 43.0 23.4 19 555 22 617 28.6 49.0 22,853 25,850 50.0 54.7 21,391 23,965 57.7 57.0 22 276 25,284 63.4 51.5 21,313 24,246 53.5 47.7 22,134 25,011 51.1 65.2 21 499 24 299 69.4 59.4 20,860 24,222 66.4 37.0 20,904 23,595 40.7 38.6 19 807 22 708 40.6 145.0 24,102 28,037 154.8 70.2 22,361 25,736 74.7 69.3 22 275 24 946 72.0 63.5 24,915 27,971 62.5 91.5 22,139 26,271 94.9 110.2 23 172 26 948 116.5 56.8 21,794 24,954 62.2 64.0 20,983 24,052 68.0 378.6 24 695 28 220 412.4 212.1 23,683 27,554 219.4 111.9 21,395 25,291 124.8 48.8 20 407 23 401 50.8 191.2 24,293 27,138 194.8 158.5 25,114 27,967 168.3 45.9 22 259 24,808 47.4 38.0 21,604 25,605 42.0 52.4 23,765 27,066 54.8 113.5 24 930 28,810 117.9 68.4 23,326 26,225 68.8 132.0 25,114 29,489 142.7 64.5 20 832 24 557 69.5 187.2 23,635 27,543 197.7 44.0 21,968 24,550 52.0 30.0 20 628 23 358 33.5 35.3 20,890 23,838 38.0 261.8 22,592 26,723 274.8 110.1 22 004 24 966 111.3 43.0 22 926 26 627 58.0 24 795 28 992 117.3 23,234 26,604 33.1 21,173 24,324 29.0 19 044 22 017 46.5 22,679 26,242 76.7 21,078 23,844 68.3 24,204 27,317 92.0 21,660 24,566 44.0 22,304 24,951 25.4 20,752 24,089 52.0 23,825 26,923 57.7 22,211 24,796 61.2 23,274 25,953 54.5 22,120 24,725 50.7 23,184 26,163 70.2 22,440 25,281 64.4 22,017 25,501 40.7 22,250 25,104 41.6 20,979 23,839 156.8 25,111 29,200 74.7 23,487 26,948 75.8 23,037 25,910 67.5 25,660 28,714 97.2 22,990 27,210 117.6 24,028 27,762 61.6 22,779 25,790 67.5 21,675 24,759 405.6 25,597 28,879 225.7 24,622 28,534 120.6 22,393 26,245 51.8 21,416 24,434 205.0 25,359 28,269 169.8 25,851 28,778 48.9 23,073 25,595 41.0 22,544 26,692 56.4 24,945 28,160 120.0 25,675 29,642 73.4 24,414 27,141 140.5 25,935 30,398 68.5 21,680 25,556 199.6 24,373 28,510 48.0 22,901 25,470 33.0 21,726 24,607 38.3 22,093 25,078 282.3 23,719 28,087 118.5 22,963 25,949 ARKANSAPSU BLIC SCHOOLD ISTRICTS ANNUAFLI SCAL REPORTA NALYSIS COLUMN 2 ~DIN DESCENDINOGR DER PA!.E NO~ 22 1990-91 NUMBEOR F EACHERS t\u0026lt;-1 A/D/M 90-=-91 91-92 LEA+ COUNT 66-02 SEBASTIAN GREENWOOD 44-01 MAD SON HU TSVI 63-02 SALINE BENTON 238 17-02 CRAWFORD CEDARVILLE 239 54-01 PHILLIPS BARTON/LEXA 240 54-03 PHILLIPS HELENA-WEST HELEN241 25 860 12-03 CLEBURNE QUITMAN 242 38.2 22_L919 27 049 23-03 FAULKNER GREENBRIER 243 9 ? 1 7 4 5 9 1 26-06 GARLAND LAKESIDE 244 2,572 2,901 ~ 081~188 126.9 129.0 24,051 27 798 136.9 139.0 24 950 28 866 41-01 LITTLE RIVER ASHDOWN 245 2,580 2,901 2,068 2J 173 133.0 136.3 23,207 2~28 144.5 147.5 24,229 26,814 42-01 LOGAN BOONEVILLE 246 2 499 2 901 1 256 1 328 73.9 75.6 24 567 29 031 80.4 81.1 25 796 30 124 49-01 MONTGOMERY CADDO HILLS 247 2,661 2,901 522 549 38.0 38.3 21,664 24,400 41.0 41.3 22 848 25 855 11-01 CLAY CORNING 248 2,465 2,900 1,187 1,250 82.5 80.9 21,926 26 340 88.0 86.4 22 844 27,340 38-04 LAWRENCE HOXIE 249 2 446 2 899 914 967 60.5 59.9 22 618 27 508 64.8 64.4 23 505 28 858 11-04 CLAY PIGGOTT 250 2,413 2,896 905 953 65.0 68.2 20,335 23,052 69.0 73.2 21,113 23,894 40-03 LINCOLN STAR CITY 251 2,511 2,896 1,450 1,506 91.9 92.3 22,897 26,320 100.6 102.0 24 005 27 384 03-04 BAXTER NORFORK 252 2 483 2 895 451 472 31.3 35.0 20 188 22 283 34.3 38.0 21 517 23 494 05-05 BOONE VALLEY SPRINGS 253 2,494 2,892 770 805 50.5 50.5 23~20 27,812 54.5 54.5 24,117 28 609 37-03 LAFAYETTE STAMPS 254 2,611 2,887 847 875 58.3 58.7 21,915 2~38 61.7 62.2 22,802 25,858 13-03 CLEVELAND RISON 255 2 366 2 886 663 689 44.8 44.7 22 378 27 958 47. 47.7 23 383 29 055 52-01 OUACHITA BEARDEN 256 2,474 2,884 855 887 55.5 55.5 22,887 28,382 60.5 60.5~258 29 298 75-07 YELL OLA 257 2,483 2,884 470 504 36.3 37.3 19,697 21,984 39.3 40.3 20 802 23 355 23-05 FAULKNER MAYFLOWER 258 2 356 2 883 667 701 44.5 47.0 21 680 25 128 47.5 50.0 22 604 6 056 70-06 UNION NORPHLET 259 2,607 2,883 563 583 41.0 41.0 26_d_17 44.0 44.0 24 261 27,219 22-03 DREW MONTICELLO 260 2,478 2,882 2,096 2,183 138.4 26,295 150.1 19-05 CROSS WYNNE 261 2 525 2 875 2 8 ? 860 7 7 .1 24-04 FRANKLIN OZARK 262 i_,_322 400 85.5 2~873 91.9 __ 93.8 38-08 LAWRENCE WALNUT RIDGE 263 852 899 62.0 25, 353 __ 66 .0 __ 65.1 2-01 ST FRANCIS FOREST y 4 7 9 70-03 UNION JUNCTION CITY 265 2,600 2,870 869 910 58.1 ~53 60.3 __ 60.3 25,116 28,311 58-01 POPE ATKINS 266 2,561 2,867 1,__035 1,097 70.0 21...._70 75.0 75.0 24,663 28,238 31-02 HOWARD DIERKS 267 2 492 2 866 573 9 39.2 26 081 42.2 43.2 22 765 26 821 35-10 JEFFERSON WHITE HALL 268 2,699 2,865 2,724 2,884 179.0 24.,_662 27,786 191.0 j,__89.0 25,507 28 619 61-03 RANDOLPH POCAHONTAS 269 2,380 2,864 1,707 1__,_807 109.6 23L513 27,085 115.6 121.6 24 301 27 662 26-05 GARLAND LAKE HAMILTON 270 2 461 2 863 901 3 047 164.5 2 173 29 156 7 5 183.0 26 269 3 458 48-03 MONROE HOLLY GROVE 271 2,929 2,863 384 401 29.5 19L545 2b_318 31.5 30. 8 20,682 23, 452 __ 50-06 NEVADA PRESCOTT 272 2,567 2,862 1,162 1,210 84.3 21,144 :M,__028 91.3 90.2 22,078 25_,__149 56-08 POINSETT EAST POINSETT COU273 2 553 2 859 776 817 58 56.5 20 599 24 198 62.0 60.5 21 67 05 58-02 POPE DOVER 274 2,465 2,857 1_,_113 1,177 70.0 73.0 23,319 26, 826 ___ 75. 0 78.0 24,022 27,664 42-04 LOGAN SCRANTON 275 2,742 2,854 391 403 28.4 27.4 22,362 25,034 __ 30. 7 29.7 2~990 26 709 75-03 YELL DANI/ILLE 276 2 581 2 853 526 555 38.6 38.6 21 581 25 063 41 6 41.6 22 64 11 67-03 SEVIER HORATIO 277 2,207 2,852 520 544 31.8 35.6 21,758 22,_490 34.7 38.6 23,187 28,360 16-03 CRAIGHEAD BROOKLAND 278 2,438 2,847 842 885 54.0 54.0 22_,833 27,336 57.0 57.0 23 763 28 354 43-02 LONOKE ENGLAND 279 2 559 2 842 1 016 1 068 71.5 71.0 2 834 25 794 7 5 76.0 3 1 6 957 16-02 CRAIGHEAD WEST SIDE 280 2,477 2,839 1,229 1,310 81.8 82.1 21,231 24 726 89.8 90.1 22,227 25 797 75-04 YELL DARDANELLE 281 2,606 2,836 1,335 1,409 91.9 90.5 21,614 24,497 97.2 96.3 22,307 25 274 28-07 GREENE GREENE COUNTY TEC282 2 403 2 834 2 123 2 223 131.4 133.3 23 179 27 566 140.1 142.1 24 030 28 558 y 17-0S CRAWFORD 42-03 LOGAN 43-01 LONOKE 58-04 POPE 18-02 CRITTENDEN 29-03 HEMPSTEAD 56-02 POINSETT 06-02 BRADLEY 67-04 SEVIER 13-04 CLEVELAND 66-05 SEBASTIAN 48-01 MONROE 01-04 ARKANSAS 59-01 PRAIRIE 67-01 SEVIER 09-0 CHICOT 54-05 PHILLIPS 08-03 CARROLL 28-03 GRE NE 17-01 CRAWFORD 73-02 WHITE 43- 4  NOKE 08-02 CARROLL SS-02 PIKE 36-01 JOHNSON 30-04 HOT SPRING 63-03 SALINE 68-04 SHARP 05-03 BOONE 14-02 COLUMBIA 74-03 WOODRUFF 69-01 STONE 59-03 PRAIRIE 21-05 DESHA 08-01 CARROLL 23-02 FAULKNER 73-0S WHITE 73-06 WHITE ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS ANNUAL FISCAL REPORT ANALYSIS VAN BUREN PARIS LONOKE POTTS I EARLE HOPE 292 HARRISBURG 293 WARREN 294 LOCKESBURG 295 WOODLAWN 296 LAVACA 297 BRINKLEY 298 STUTTGART 299 DES ARC 300 DEQUEEN 301 DER TT 3 LAKE VIEW GREEN FOREST MARMAD KE ALMA 306 BEEBE 307 A OT 3 8 EUREKA SPRINGS 309 GLENWOOD 310 CLARKSVILLE 311 MALVERN 312 BRYANT 313 HIGHLAND 314 HARRISON 315 MAGNOLIA 316 MCCRORY 317 MOUNTAIN VIEW 318 HAZEN 319 MCGEHEE 320 BERRYVILLE 321 ENOLA 322 GRIFFITHVILLE 323 JUDSONIA 324 COLUMN 2 RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER EXPENSE 1990 91 PER ADA 90-91 91-92 A/D/A A/D/M 2,978 916 2,809 1,733 2,806 447 2 803 402 2,497 2,801 721 2,399 2,800 1,264 1,338 2 481 2 796 2 304 2 437 ~329 2,791 642 676 2,407 1,449 2L430 2,756 595 625 2,528 2,753 399 419 2 363 2 750 1 490 1 60 2,360 2,728 2,578 2,690 2,276 2,722 4,903 5,216 2 418 2 674 1 229 1 290 2,338 2,673 2,504 2,618 2,326 2,667 2,967 :Lj.30 2 361 2 656 823 860 2,352 2,635 1,036 1,084 2,459 2,630 538 560 2 357 2 619 1 227 1 276 2,231 2,610 1,331 1,393 3,529 121 126 4 024 161 168 2,626 554 592 NI/MBER PE TEACHERS K-12 90-91 91-92 AVG SIRY TCHRS. K-12 90-91 91-92 266.5 275.S 24,929 28~772 25,J:!_69 32.6 23,775 30.5 29.9 22 201 50.5 51.6 20,793 23,340 89.1 87.1 20,413 23_,_896 152.2 149.9 27 05 41.9 2~41 26,561 ?6 9 19 ,...376 24,559 27 541 27,_669 26,i92 40.8 41.S 24,i47 30.5 30.5 21~33 97.5 102.0 22 571 25 66 174.5 174.5 22,021 25,604 286.6 292.6 25,815 30,085 75.S 79.0 22 162 24 775 152.4 154.3 22,991 26,373 175.9 174.5 24,035 28,255 53.0 51.7 22 743 25 74 65.0 65.0 23,596 27,~42 38.6 36.5 19,206 22,792 79.5 81.0 22 334 25 180 84.0 88.0 21,773 25,257 13.1 17,962 17.6 19 502 38.0 22,494 PAGE NO. 23 N . PE CERT AVG SI RY PEB_S_QNl'IEL 90-91 91-92 C.ERL___P__ERS_._ 90-91 91-92 283.0 292.0 25~926 29,819 24L967 23 629 54.6 21,850 24,201 95.1 93,1 21,121 24,460 162.1 159.8 23 7 8 27 988 43.8 ~547 26_L125 94.3 ~568 27...,_738 5 ':\u0026gt;9 \") 12 21.1 18, 092 20_,_945 22 420 2~469 4 1 28 290 24 749 29,_Q_l:!_8 2b683 26_,_867 48 43.8 44.5 22,463 33.5 33.5 19,708 22-1.._522 102.5 107 0 23 479 26 759 183.0 183.0 22,732 26,362 301.5 309.5 26,520 30,875 80.5 84.0 23 154 25 869 163.3 165.2 23,976 27,642 189.0 186.6 25 024 29..t.245 56.5 26 712 69.0 69.0 27,986 41.6 39.S 23,917 84.5 86.0 23 200 26 226 88.0 92.0 22,371 25,847 14.6 19,520 19.9 21 079 41.0 23,729 -- --- ---- ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS ANNUAL FISCAL REPORT ANALYSIS COLUMN3 RANKEDI N DESCENDINGO RDER PAGE NO. 24 - - - EXPENSE 1990-91 AVG. SLRY. NO. OF CERT. AVG. SLRY. PER ADA TCHRS. 1(-12 PERSONNEL CERT. PERS. 90-91 91-,9,2 91-92 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1,970.0 1,986.3 29,510 32,960 1 445.3 1 454.3 28 667 28 830 805.4 834.9 28,883 32,136 666.1 666.0 26,522 29,976 491.0 491.5 27 755 30 847 477.0 485.5 27,504 31,244 386.6 403.4 28,108 32,060 416.6 426.9 27 882 31 160 412.4 405.6 25,597 28,879 353.3 25,1 366.5 384.5 26,175 29,841 389.5 23 949 410.6 416.8 24,953 28,293 BRYANT 286.6 292.6 25,815 301.5 309.5 26,520 30,875 FORREST CITY 2,870 296.6 299 .. 2 23,470 26,789~0.1 332.7 24,587 27,705 A 3 050 s 110 339.4 339.3 23 278 26 673 360.2 359.1 24,106 27,512 58-0S POPE RUSSELLVILLE 3,330 4,879 303.6 310.9 25,798 30,231 323.3 331.7 26,963 31,387 43-04 LONOKE CABOT 4 832 264.S 285.0 24,371 28,136 281.0 302.0 25,307 29,048 4 770 309.4 301.4 25 478 29 486 329.3 320.4 26,346 30,350 17-0S CRAWFORD VAN BUREN 18 266.5 275 .. 5 24,929 28,772 283.0 292.0 25,926 29,819 54-03 PHILLIPS HELENA-WESTH ELEN ,1,9 ,, 289.0 286.0 22,302 24,928 306.0 303.0 23,156 25,860 277.9 277.6 23 797 27 561 296.0 295.7 24 866 28,693 04-01 BENTON BENTONVILLE 21 2,487 260.3 261.8 22,592 26,723 274.8 282.3 23,719 28,087 52-04 OUACHITA FAIRVIEW ,2,2 2,,, 261.3 253.8 24,070 28,414 280.2 273.8 25,136 29,537 239.8 243.0 23 854 27,888 254 .. 8 258 .. 0 24,780 28,915 35-09 JEFFERSON WATSON CHAPEL 24 2 209.6 211.6 26,185 29,567 225 .. 6 227.6 27,328 30,753 03-03 BAXTER MOUNTAIN HOME 25 2, 194.9 199.8 24,400 28,162 210.4 216.4 25,607 29,310 ?6 2 205.8 212.1 23 683 27 554 219.4 225.7 24,622 28,534 26-03 GARLAND HOT SPRINGS 27 3, 239.2 232.8 24,490 27,350 255.2 248.3 25,599 28,802 29-03 HEMPSTEAD HOPE 28 2,481 178.5 181.5 24,433 28,485 190.5 193.5 25,485 29,512 A MAGNOLIA 29 2 326 175.9 174.5 24 035 28,255 189.0 186.6 25,024 29,245 26-05 GARLAND LAKE HAMILTON 30 2,461 2,863 164.5 170.0 25,173 29,156 177.5 183.0 26,269 30,458 73-11 WHITE SEARCY 31 2,587 2,937 181.2 191.2 24,293 27,138 194.8 205.0 25,359 28,269 9- R WYNNE 32 2 525 2 875 183.5 180.8 23 808 27,357 195.1 192.4 24,802 28,442 35-10 JEFFERSON WHITE HALL 33 2,699 179.0 177.0 24,662 27,786 191.0 189.0 25,507 28,619 ASHLEY CROSSETT 34 2,593 185.7 187.2 23,635 27,543 197.7 199.6 24,373 28,510 LE MARIANNA 35 2 975 183.5 183.5 23,103 25,458 200.0 200.0 24,252 26,867 HOT SPRING MALVERN 36 2,360 2,690 174.5 174.5 22,021 25,604 183.0 183.0 22,732 26,362 05-03 BOONE_ HARRISON 37 2,338 2,618 152.4 154.3 22,991 26,373 163.3 165 .. 2 23,976 27,642 5- ONWAY so. CONWAYc o. 38 2 610 153.0 155.0 23,250 28,587 165.8 167.8 24,263 29,621 32_-01 INDEPENDENCE BATE_SVILLE 39 2,672 157.0 158.5 25,114 27,967 168.3 169.8 25,851 28,778 18-04 CR_ITTENDEN MARION 40 2,493 143.0 145.0 24,102 28,037 154.8 156.8 25,111 29,200 STUTTGART 41 2 481 152.2 149.9 22,802 27,051 162.1 159.8 23,728 27,988 66-02 SEBASTIAN GREENWOOD 42 2,516 2,909 2,398 142.1 148.6 25,396 28,836 150.1 156.6 26,332 29,770 DUMAS 43 2,439 2,818 2,259 2,381 133.0 137.5 25,061 28,513 143.5 148.0 26,197 29,752 NORTHEAST ARKANSA 44 2 692 3 005 2 226 2 369 152.5 151.4 23,495 27,217 162.7 162.6 24,277 28,050 ALMA 45 2,375 2 764 2,186 2,288 137.5 140.5 23,431 27,669 146.8 149.8 24,749 29,088 ARKADELPHIA 46 2 614 3,022 2,181 2,267 145.9 148.9 22,384 26,027 155.8 159.3 23,404 27,122 P INGS 47 2 553 2 989 2 149 2 273 133.5 137.0 24 071 28 077 144.5 148.0 25,273 29,350 ARKANSAS Pl IA\u0026amp; IC SCHOOi PISTBICTS ANNUAL FISCAL REPORT ANALYSIS COLUMN 3 RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER PAGE NO . .z.s_ EXPENSE 1990 91 NUMBER OF AVG, SLRY, NO. OF CERT. AVG. SLRY. PER ADA TEACHERS K-12 TCHRS. K-12 PERSONNEL CERT. PERS. 90-91 91-92 A/D/A A/D/M 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 9 10 11 12 489 142.7 140.5 25,935 30,398 140.1 142.1 24 030 28 558 150.1 150.3 23,590 27,577 28 05.L_g,O. 2 152.4 24,940 28,895 136.9 139.0 24 950 28 866 159.1 158.0 26,389 30,109 25,828 144.5 147.5 24 229 26,814 26 360 141.5 140.3 24 196 27 241 21,763 25,354 144.2 147.8 22,764 26,449 23,100 25,869 124.5 126.5 24,570 27,468 23 513 27 085 115.6 121.6 24,301 27,662 --- 57-03 POLK MENA 113.5 24,930 28,810 117.9 120.0 25,675 29,642 31-05 HOWARD NASHVILLE 110.2 23,172 26,948 116.5 117.6 24,028 27,762 107.4 22 918 26 479 111.1 114.1 23,782 27 580 02-03 ASHLEY HAMBURG 110.0 21,956 25,346 117.2 117.3 23,234 26,604 73-02 WHITE BEEBE 103.4 106.7 21,807 26,192 109.6 113.9 22,683 26,867 115.1 111.9 21 395 25 291 124.8 120.6 22,393 26,245 44-01 MADISON HUNTSVILLE 1,666 104.6 105.9 22,473 27,092 109.6 110.9 23,110 27,761 23-07 FAULKNER VILONIA 3,029 1,614 97.0 101.0 23,538 27,980 104.0 109.0 24,352 28,878 2 909 1 638 102.5 110.1 22 004 24 966 111.3 118.5 22,963 25,949 23-03 FAULKNER GREENBRIER 68 2,344 2,902 1,505 1,586 87.5 99.0 24,801 27,934 93.5 104.5 25,713 28,921 36-01 JOHNSON CLARKSVILLE 69 2,363 2_,750 1,490 1,560 97.5 102.0 22,571 25,660 102.5 107.0 23,479 26,759 6 1 450 1 506 91.9 92.3 22 897 26 320 100.6 102.0 24,005 27,384 67-01 SEVIER DEQUEEN 71 2L788 1,449 1~9 88.8 90.4 23,566 26,561 94.3 96.4 24,568 27,738 64-01 SCOTT WALDRON 72 3,235 1,424 1,511 109.1 108.5 21,944 24,952 115.3 115.3 22,658 25,840 2 836 1 335 1 409 91.9 90.5 21 614 24 497 97.2 96.3 22,307 25,274 08-01 CARROLL BERRYVILLE 74 2.,231 1,331 1,393 84.0 88.0 21,773 25,257 88.0 92.0 22,371 25,847 24-04 FRANKLIN OZARK 75 2,499 1,322 1,400 85.5 87.5 22,725 25,873 91.9 93.8 23,698 26,926 1 1 322 1 397 86.4 84.8 22 921 26 642 91.9 90.9 23,756 27,616 01-01 ARKANSAS DEWITT 77 2_,7 18 92.7 94.7 23,157 26,141 98.9 101.1 24,016 27,140 12-02 CLEBURNE HEBER SPRINGS 78 2,480 89.5 91.5 22,139 26,271 94.9 97.2 22,990 27,210 E B I I\u0026lt; EY 79 2 399 89.1 87.1 20 413 23 896 95.1 93.1 21,121 24,460 -42-01 LOGAN BOONEVILLE 80 2,499 73.9 ~6 24,567 29,031 80.4 81.1 25,796 30,124 20-02 DALLAS FORDYCE 81 3,087 88.7 88.0 22,429 2:5,216 95.7 94.0 23,368 26,245 E T ID 82 477 81.8 82.1 21 231 24,726 89.8 90.i 22,227 25,797 68-04 SHARP HIGHLAND 83 Z,418 75.5 79.0 22,162 24,775 80.5 84.0 23,154 25,869 21-05 DESHA MCGEHEE Bi 2,357 79.5 81.0 22,334 25,180 84.5 86.0 23,200 26,226 LA s 85 2 617 86.3 86.0 20 759 23,497 92.3 92.0 21,660 24,566 PARIS 86 2,638 1,260 82.0 82.2 23,725 26,602 87.9 88.1 24,571 27,499 CORNING 87 2,4_65 1,250 82.5 80.9 21,926 26,340 88.0 86.4 22,844 27,340 PRESCOTT 88 2 567 162 1 210 84.3 83.3 21 144 24,028 91.3 90.2 22,078 25,149 DERMOTT 89 2 502 123 1 193 74.3 73.0 24,145 26,991 79.3 78.0 25,129 28,122 DOVER 90 2 465 113 1 177 70.0 73.0 23,319 26,826 75.0 78.0 24,022 27,664 2 463 073 1 126 70.3 74.0 22 278 25 652 75.0 79.0 23,318 26,568 92 2 430 1 071 1 126 71.3 72.5 21,586 24,559 77.0 78.5 22,420 25,469 93 2 727 1 058 1 099 75.5 76.5 22,664 25,381 83.4 84.3 23,741 26,598 94 2 586 1 039 1 103 69.7 73.0 22 643 26 433 76.0 80.0 23,544 27,356 ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS ANNUAL FISCAL REPORT ANALYSIS --------------------------'\"-\"\"'LUHN 3 RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER PAGE NO. 26 . . P~RSONNEL . CFRT: PERS . -- PER____AM TEACHERS K-12 TCHRS. 1\u0026lt;-12 EXPENSE 1990 91 NUMBER OF AVG SLRY NO OF CERT AVG SLRY 90-91 'l-1~92 A/D/A A/D/M 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 --EA  cnuNTY nT!':TRTr.T ,,,,... .., i ,, 3 4 ~ 6 7 A 0 . (\\  .,, __ 7_2-0~ _W_ ASHIJ'!GTON FARMINGTON 95 2~7 3_,0 01 1 038 1 096 67.8 70 6 21 545 26 400 72.6 75.3 22 619 27 459 69 01 STONE Mnl JNTATN VTC-1.1 O.L ,, ...._ ,, ? .L\"ZC: i ,... .., . i r.OA .Lm':0 LC: 0 ?\"Z C:0.L ?7 AA') ,n f\\ 1,9 0 ?A AO? 27 OA.L __ 58-01 POPE ATKINS 97 ~.561 ~67 1 035 1 097 70.0 70.0 23 930 27 570 75.0 75.0 24 663 28,238 22-02 DREW DREW CENTRAL 98 2 611 2 950 1 023 1 064 70.2 70.2 22 361 25 736 74.7 74.7 23 487 26 948 43 -02 LONOKE ENGi AND 99 ,, c:c:o ? QAC\u0026gt; 1 ,.. .L 1 \"-\"-\"' 7'\\ ~ 71 . 0 C\u0026gt;\")Q \"IA ,_,= ~,-,A '?.\u0026lt;. \"' '?.t. r, ,.,~ n'li C\u0026gt;.\u0026lt;9.,5 7 72-06 WASHINGTON PRAIRIE GROVE 100_2 _,_J~ ~t5 _, 92\n3 1 013 1 070 63.8 68.4 23 326 26 225 68.8 73.4 24 414 27 141 04-04 BENTON GRAVETTE 101 2 622 2 947 985 1 033 68.0 69.3 22 275 24 946 72.0 75.8 23 037 25 910 36 04 IMHNsnLI I i!\u0026gt;MAR ',..,, -, 377 ? Q40 97A 1 r.-:,o .L\"I 7 .L\"' 7 ?1 1,07 ,_,A~~~ .L7 .., In C: ,.,,, ... ,.,. ?C: \"\"\"'\" 04-03 BENTON GENTRY 103 2 548 ~77 969 1 018 72.0 72.7 20,387 23,000 76.0 76.7 21,078 23,844 16-12 CRAIGHEAD VALLEY VIEW 104 2,424 2 946 960 998 58.5 63.5 24 915 27 971 62.5 67.5 25 660 28 714 68-02 SHARP CAVE CITY 105 2 528 2 976 950 998 60.0 64.3 23 340 2.1. 548 6\".0 -\"-A.3 24 204 27 \"14_7 18-02 CRITTENDEN EARLE 106 3,104 2,811 937 982 69.0 65.0 23 968 26 910 73.2 69.2 24 955 27 781 72-05 WASHINGTON LINCOLN 107 2,696 2 958 929 987 65.4 65 .. 2 21 499 24 299 69.4 70.2 22 440 25 281 09 02 CHICOT EUDORA 108 2 867 3 012 925 966 66.5 59 a -:\u0026gt;1 \"\"'4 -,c\n099 7?  .L .t.4.9 -:,-, 40 ... 26 4\"'\"' 56-02 POINSETT HARRISBURG 109 2,563 2 811 916 976 65.0 63.8 21 791 24 279 69.0 67.8 22 612 25 086 38-04 LAWRENCE HOXIE 110 2,446 2,899 914 967 60.5 59.9 22 618 27 508 64.8 64.4 23 505 28 858 11 04 CLAY PIGGOTT 111 2 413 2.896 905 953 65.0 68-, 20 335 23 05? LO(\\ 73 2 ?4 4 4 \"I ?\"I A94 72-08 WASHINGTON WEST FORK 112 2 596 2 957 894 932 61.4 59.4 20,860 24,222 66.4 64.4 22,017 25,501 10-03 CLARI\u0026lt; GURDON 113 2 574 2 921 881 921 65.5 64.5 20 832 24 557 69.5 68.5 21 680 25 556 07 01 CALHOUN HAMPTON 114 2 654 3 099 879 910 58.8 60.2 23 248 27 539 L,_, ... 6\"~ 7 ?4 I :1~1 2~, 4QQ 70-03 UNION JUNCTION CITY 115 2 600 2 870 869 910 58.1 58.1 24 097 27 353 60.3 60.3 25-116 28 311 52-01 OUACHITA BEARDEN 116 2,474 2 884 855 887 55.5 55.5 22 887 28 382 60.5 60.5 24,258 29,298 26-02 GARLAND FOUNTAIN LAKE 117 3 072 3 309 853 899 62.5 6\" 5 \"'.\u0026gt;.4 4Q-::t 27 10n .\u0026lt;.7 \" ,47 (\\ --,c, .L7? --,o A--,0 47-12 MISSISSIPPI MANILA 118 2,652 2,943 853 905 57.4 56.8 21 794 24 954 62.2 61.6 22 779 25 790 38-08 LAWRENCE WALNUT RIDGE 119 2,473 2 871 852 899 62.0 61.1 20 867 25 353 66.0 65.1 21 649 26 249 37-03 LAFAYETTE STAMPS 120 2 611 2 887 847 875 \"\"\"' 3 'SA 7 21 Q4m\n24 O\"TO .\u0026lt;.i '7 A2 . ? \"\u0026gt;\"\") '\"? '\"\u0026gt;C: ocr.o 56-04 POINSETT MARKED TREE 121 2 668 2 942 847 894 64.5 64.0 20,983 24,052 68.0 67.5 21,675 24,759 16-03 CRAIGHEAD BROOKLAND 122 2,438 2 847 842 885 54.0 54.0 22 833 27 336 57.0 57.0 23 763 28 354 66-06 SEBASTIAN MANSFIELD 123 2 734 3 061 832 873 58.8 58 8 23 408 25 834 62.8 63.5 24 420 27 038 30-02 HOT SPRING GLEN ROSE 124 2 539 2 988 824 864 53.6 54.0 23 866 27 882 56.6 58.0 24 795 28 992 54-04 PHILLIPS MARVELL 125 2 723 2 966 823 870 57.5 57.0 22 276 25 284 63.4 61.2 23 274 25 953 74-03 WOODRUFF MCCRORY 126 2 361 2 656 823 860 53.0 51.7 22 743 25 741 56.5 55.2 23 534 26 712 19-01 CROSS CROSS COUNTY 127 2 825 3 135 820 857 60.7 60.0 20 372 23 814 65.8 65.2 21 367 24 893 53-03 PERRY PERRYVILLE 128 2 489 3,041 807 848 50.9 53.5 22 719 26 790 53.9 56 .. 5 23 797 27 602 70-08 UNION SMACKOVER 129 2 668 2 930 800 837 50.8 52.4 23,765 27,066 54.8 56.4 24,945 28,160 45-02 MARION YELLVILLE-SUMMIT 130 2,736 3 017 791 832 55.0 57.6 21 660 24 347 58.0 61.1 22 574 25 422 16-13 CRAIGHEAD RIVERSIDE 131 2,873 3,028 786 820 59.0 56.0 21 364 23 937 63.0 60.0 22,383 25 126 16-05 CRAIGHEAD BUFFALO ISLAND CE132 2 685 3 025 784 814 59.0 59.0 21 348 24 708 63.8 63.8 22 079 25 468 30-01 HOT SPRING BISMARCK 133 2,427 3,006 778 812 48.3 52.0 23 170 27 850 51.3 55.0 24,117 28,803 56-08 POINSETT EAST POINSETT COU134 2,553 2,859 776 817 58.0 56.5 20,599 24,198 62.0 60.5 21,467 25,059 05-05 BOONE VALLEY SPRINGS 135 2,494 2,892 770 805 50.5 50.5 23 320 27 812 54.5 54.5 24 117 28 609 52-05 OUACHITA HARMONY GROVE 136 2,563 3,038 760 788 48.5 49.5 22,977 26,960 51.5 52.5 23,926 27,902 17-03 CRAWFORD MOUNTAINBURG 137 2,676 3,105 759 813 53.0 54.0 23,099 26,583 57.0 58.0 23,966 27,267 46-03 MILLER FOUKE 138 2 627 2 990 755 797 51.7 52.7 22 384 26 159 54.7 55.7 23 111 26 870 11-06 CLAY CLAY COUNTY CENTR139 2,697 2,968 748 782 54.7 54.7 21,391 23,965 57.7 57.7 22,211 24,796 45-01 MARION FLIPPIN 140 2,691 3,103 741 781 48.0 49.0 24,145 28,048 51.0 52.3 25,200 29,180 66-05 SEBASTIAN LAVACA 141 2 497 2 801 721 761 50.5 51.6 20 793 23 340 53.5 54.6 21 850 24 201 ARKANSAPSU BLIC SCHOOLD ISTRICTS ANNUALF ISCAL REPORTA NALYSIS COLUMN3 RANKEDI N DESCENDINGO RDER PACE NO. 27 AVG, SLRY. NO, Of CERT, AyC. SLRY. TCHRS. K-12 PERSONNEL CERT. PERS. 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 10 11 12 75.3 75.4 29 495 29 644 4 o.o 23 600 27 440 53.7 53.4 24 312 27 503 53.0 54.0 23 986 27 197 56.6 56.6 21 778 25 043 313 53.5 54.5 22 120 24 725 590 755 51.1 52.0 22 489 25 675 933 969 48.4 49.4 23 955 29 881 20 828 170 54.2 55.5 21 783 25 149 47 \u0026amp;___ 49.0 22,853 850 50.0 52.0 23,825 26,923 4:S.0 48.0 2:S 001 620 48.0 51.0 2:S,738 27,432 48.2 47.7 22,134 011 51.1 50.7 23,184 26,163 44~ 47.0 21,680 25,128 47.:S 50.0 22,604 26,056 42.2 46.1 23 322 26 319 45.3 49.2 24,596 27,627 44.8 44.7 22,378 27,958 47.8 47.7 23,383 29,055 1 48.0 44.0 21,968 24,550 52.0 48.0 22,901 25,470 89 43.0 44.3 21 167 27 310 46.0 47.3 22,285 28,225 76 40.7 41.9 21,648 25,241 43.8 45.0 22,547 26,125 72 47.8 48.8 20,407 23,401 50.8 51.8 21,416 24,434 73 46 .. 2 46.2 20 958 23 980 49.2 49.2 22,297 25,414 67 46.0 47.0 22,406 25,015 49.0 50.0 23,133 25,924 40.6 40.6 23,344 27,541 43.6 43.6 24,381 28,290 44.4 45.9 22 259 24 808 47.4 48.9 23 073 25,595 39.5 40.0 25,259 28,632 42.5 43.0 26,561 29,877 42.7 42.7 21,575 25,787 45.7 45.7 22,513 26,912 44.6 45.6 21 989 26 020 47.6 48.6 22,884 26,925 42.0 42.0 19,908 24,849 45.4 45.4 21,299 26,412 40.8 41.5 21,305 24,147 43.8 44.5 22,463 25,477 38.5 41.5 23 031 25 728 41.5 44.5 24,335 27,102 40.0 41.0 21,319 23,910 43.0 44.0 22,304 24,951 43.5 43.5 21,482 25,103 46.5 46.5 22,679 26,242 44 4 45.2 21 141 24 131 47.4 48.2 22 099 25 254 37-02 184 579 61,_2 43~ 40.3 22,519 26,079 46.8 43.8 23,713 27,300 866 573 :596 39.2 40.2 21,712 26,081 42.2 43.2 22,765 26,821 1-42 569 590 43.6 42.6 21 414 24,109 46.6 45.6 22,450 25,103 568 597 42.0 42 .. 7 21,758 24,359 45.5 46.2 22,839 25,689 566 593 41.7 41.7 27,093 27,444 44.7 45.7 28,196 27,999 563 583 41.0 41.0 23 212 26 417 44.0 44.0 24,261 27,219 562 594 39.5 38.2 22,919 26,206 42.5 41.2 23,841 27,049 44.3 40.7 19,945 24,416 47.3 43.7 20,761 25,269 37.6 37.6 23 619 27 283 40.6 40.6 24,533 28,209 44.2 43.3 22,202 25,552 47.2 46.3 23,310 26,761 3,509 42.0 42.3 20,121 23,897 45.0 45.3 21,520 25,407 5 626 38.0 22 494 41.0 23,729 MAGNET COVE 186 014 3,172 43.9 42.0 21,175 23,619 46.9 45.0 22,112 24,778 ALTHEIMER-SHERRIL187 847~139 39.4 40.4 19,907 22,626 42.4 43.4 20,893 23,655 8 627 2 989 :575 39.7 40.0 21 833 25 472 42.7 43.0 22,926 26,627 66-03 SEBASTIAN 49-01 MONTGOMERY 33-06 ARD 67-03 SEVIER 34-05 JACKSON 73-10 WHITE 49-02 MONTGOMERY 73-04 WHITE 03-02 BAXTER 52-06 OUACHITA 18-05 CRITTENDEN 71-04 VAN BUREN 53-01 PERRY 61-02 RANDOLPH 12-01 CLEBURNE 26-01 GARLAND 38-06 LAWRENCE 31-04 HOWARD 04-02 BENTON 73-07 WHITE 33-02 IZARD 75-07 YELL 05-01 BOONE 59-02 PRAIRIE 03-04 BAXTER 57-05 POLK 29-01 HEMPSTEAD 67-04 SEVIER 42-02 LOGAN 37-01 LAFAYETTE 66-04 SEBASTIAN 33-01 IZARD 25-01 FULTON 12-04 CLEBURNE 55-03 PIKE 15-05 CONWAY 17-04 CRAWFORD 71-05 VAN BUREN 13-04 CLEVELAND 55-02 PIKE 25-03 FULTON 13-01 CLEVELAND ARKANSAPSU BLIC SCHOOLD ISTRICTS ANNUAFLI SCAL REPORTA NALYSIS TUCKERMAN UD MOUNT IDA CENTRAL COTTER STEPHENS TURRELL SHIRLEY EAST END MAYNARD CONCORD CUTTER-HORNING SLOAN-HENDRIX MINERAL SPRINGS DECATUR 212 KENSETT 213 MELBOURNE 214 OLA 215 ALPENA 216 DEVALLS BLUFF 217 NORFORK 218 WICKES 219 BLEVINS 220 LOCKESBURG 221 MAGAZINE 222 BRADLEY 223 HARTFORD 224 CALICO ROCK 225 MAMMOTHS PRING 226 WEST SIDE 227 KIRBY 228 WONDERVIEW 229 MULBERRY 230 SOUTH SIDE 231 WOODLAWN 232 GLENWOOD 233 VIOLA 234 KINGSLAND 235 COLUMN 3 RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER 1990-91 NUMBERO F ____ TEACHERS K-12 90-91 91-92 3,231 3 055 2,970 3,405 474 499 44.0 43.3 2,861 474 504 34.0 89.2 2 \"'1 2 4 2,483 470 504 36.3 37.3 2,686 461 482 30.7 31.6 2 69 8 4 7 2,483 2,895 451 472 31.3 35.0 2,621 3,016 451 475 30.0 30.6 2 888 152 449 468 5 3 2,552 2,806 447 472 32.6 33.4 2_,835 3,152 441 467 33.5 34.5 2 920 3 323 440 469 37.5 37.5 2,910 3,344 440 470 36.5 36.5 2,657 3,291 435 457 34.1 36.6 2 888 3 222 428 451 33.8 34.5 2,635 3,129 426 448 31.7 32.5 2,710 3,179 424 447 35.2 36.5 2 678 2 980 419 437 30.1 30.1 2,645 3,068 439 33.1 33.2 2,877 3,124 431 33.0 33.0 2 539 2 803 417 30.5 29.9 2,528 2,753 419 30.5 30.5 2,711 3,047 415 29.5 30.0 2 708 3 076 411 26.8 26.6 AVG. SLRY. 1\".CHRS, K-12 90-91 \u0026lt;\n1_1-92 19,333 21,625 23,050_25,802 19_,697 2j_,_5'84 22_, 765 25_, 947 4 20L188 2~83 22,692 2~60 9 20L950 23,775 21,487 24,342 20 120 22 99 21,097 23L934 20,404 23,314 22 :569 25 325 20,652 25,688 19,945 2~027 19 889 23 297 21,716 25,126 21,490 23,696 19 931 22 201 18,369 21,333 21,778 24,765 19 836 23 259 --- 47.0 46.3 20,269 22,654 37.Q_______!l7.2 24,554 27,032 39.3 __ 40.3 2Q_,_802 23,355 33.7 __ 34.6 23_,_9 85 27 ~53 34.3 21,517 23 494 32.5 21,J,_08 26,918 ?4 8 6 4 35.6 36.4 22,255 24,967 36.5 37.5 22,379 25,259 40.5 40.5 21 42 24 132 39.7 39.7 22,035 24,920 37.1 39.6 21,508 24,523 36.3 37.0 23 751 26 288 34 ._7_ _ 35. 5 21_,_592 2~20 39.1 40.4 20___,__87233 ,007 33.1 33.1 21 173 24 324 36.4 36.5 22 793 26,146 35.5 36.0 22,060 24,517 33.6 33.0 21 164 23 629 33.5 33.5 19,708 22,522 31.5 32.0 22,917 25,992 29.8 29.4 20 738 24 406 ARKANSASP IJBI IC SCHOOL DISTRICTS ANNUAL FISCAL REPORT ANALYSIS COLUMN 3 RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER PAGE NO. 29 NUMBER Of AY!i, SLRY. NO. OF CERT. AI/G. SLRY. TEACHERS K-12 TCHRS. K-12 PERSONNEL CERT. PERS. 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 7 8 9 10 ii 12 25 034 30.7 29.7 23 990 26,709 22 318 31.5 30.8 20 682 23 452 22,671 32.0 34.0 21 360 22,970 23,358 33.5 33.0 21,726 24,607 2 4 9 23 3 0 32.5 34.6 21 265 24 150 __ 32. 6 19 588 22, 70_1_ _ 37. 0 35.6 20,784 24,161 29.4 19,283 21J~ 32.3 32.3 20,678 23,210 32.7 20 116 22 233 38.0 35.7 21 124 23 393 57-04 PQ!.K_ I/AN COVE 375 3 L 3 20, 563 22, 72~3 . 3 3~ 21,814 23,885 20-03 DALLAS SPARKMAN 362 26.1 19,954 23,089 30.5 28.1 21,392 24,850 341 354 27.1 23 895 26 812 33.6 30.1 25,319 28,474 29-05 HEMPSTEAD SARATOGA 340 354 25 .. 6 27.8 17,651 20,728 28.1 30.3 19,005 22,269 51-01 NEWTON DEER 335 357 25.8 25.0 20,967 24,243 27.8 27.0 22,098 25,454 332 349 25.6 26.1 18 335 20 566 28.6 29.1 19,594 21,573 3,529 329 347 27.5 27.8 19,972 23,130 30.3 30.6 21,469 24,467 ,, 3,141 328 341 26.0 26.0 21,169 23,497 29.0 29.0 22,615 25,088 04 327 352 26.2 26.0 23 766 25 685 28.2 28.0 25,225 27,131 74-02 WOODRUFF COTTON PLANT 253 2,856 3,055 325 340 28.4 27.4 18,755 22,078 30.9 29.9 19,680 23,099 21-02 DESHA DELTA SPECIAL 254 2,974 3,165 324 341 27.1 26.6 19,060 21,556 30.1 29.6 20,755 23,048 2 687 3 435 324 335 21.8 22.7 18 717 24 072 24.8 24.7 19,736 25,212 256 2,571 2,980 323 341 25 .. 8 26.0 18,021 20,888 28.8 29.0 19,044 22,017 PAUL 257 2,846 3,198 321 337 2~ .. 3 26.3 20,710 23,396 27.5 28.5 21,764 24,394 58 2 928 3 041 320 337 26.8 24.9 18 969 21 888 29.8 26.9 20,212 23,100 70-11 UNION UNION 259 ~087 326 25.1 25.0 21,886 24,188 28 .. 0 28.0 23,293 25,651 01-05 ARKANSAS HUMPHREY 260 2,771 322 23.2 23.2 22,369 27,520 25.2 25.2 23,329 28,487 2 1 2 640 323 25.1 25 .. 4 19 335 22 501 27.5 27.520,353 23,453 24-01 FRANKLIN ALTUS-DENNING 262 2,__839 323 26.6 23.4 19,555 22,617 28.6 25 .. 4 20,752 24,089 29-06 HEMPSTEAD SPRING HILL 263 2_,651 307 22.0 22.0 19,606 24,774 25.0 25.0 20,921 26,217 264 2 975 306 23.4 23.4 19 252 22 588 26.4 26.4 20,303 24,072 44-02 MADISON KINGSTON 265 2,950 300 21.0 21.0 21,498 25,643 23.0 23.0 23,025 27,229 45-03 MARION MARION CO 266 3,100 303 22.7 19.7 21,032 25,791 24.7 21.7 22,218 26,553 267 2 742 302 19.9 19.6 19,000 22,950 2~ 22.5 21,156 24,774 268 3,168 298 23.5 24.5 21,440 23,723 26.1 27.1 22,720 25,302 269 3,083 299 24.0 23.6 20,080 24, 07-3--26. 8 26.4 21,186 25,151 0 \"847 293 21.7 21 .. 2 20 790 24,156 23.8 23.3 21,967 25,331 INDEPENDENCE SULPHUR ROCK 271 2,925 294 24.3 23.4 20,340 23,265 26.3 25.4 21,519 24,554 UNION HUTTIG 272 3,143 293 21.0 22 .. 0 22,776 25,112 23.0 24.0 23,922 26,451 s GILLETT 273 3 174 288 23.6 24.6 20,081 21,921 26.5 27.5 21,637 23,436 FAULKNER GUY-PERKINS 274 3,198 283 23.0 23.5 20,696 23,355 25.0 25.5 21,847 24,396 INDEPENDENCE CUSHMAN 275 3,235 286 22.9 24.8 21,442 24,645 25.4 27.3 22,633 25,939 NE DELAPLAINE 276 3 052 285 21.4 23.2 21,828 24,835 24.1 25.4 22,888 25,892 51-04 NEWTON WESTERN GROVE 277 2,743 283 21.1 21.4 20,175 23,780 23.2 23.5 21,487 24,766 33-03 IZARD MOUNT PLEASANT 278 3,213 274 24.6 24.5 22,182 24,694 26.6 26.5 21,885 24,298 WABBASEKA-TUCKER 279 2 931 282 21.0 20.0 18,326 22,969 24.0 23.0 19,553 24,399 68-03 SHARP EVENING SHADE 280 2,941 273 24.0 24.7 18,271 21,090 26.0 26.7 19,470 22,054 68-05 SHARP WILLIFORD 281 3,197 271 22.0 22.5 19,234 21,649 24 .. 5 25.0 20,713 22,744 7-04 RANT PRATTSVILLE 282 3 011 268 17.0 17.0 25,864 28,709 19.0 19.0 27,408 30,378 ARKANSAPSU BLIC SCHOOLD ISTRICTS ANNUALFI SCAL REPORTA NALYSIS COLUMN 3 RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER PAGE t'.jO. ~ EXPENSE 1990-91 NUMBERO f AVG. SLRY. NO. Of CERT. AVG. SLRY. PER ADA TEACHERS K-12 TCHRS. K-12 PERSONNEL CERT. PERS. 90-91 91-92 A/D/A A/D/M 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 90-91 91~92 90-91 91-92 _____ 32-02 INDEPENDENCE - 46-0 MILER 02-02 ASHLEY 27-03 GRANT POYEN 51-03 NEWTON MOUNT J 14-07 COLUMBIA WALKER 23-06 FAULKNER MOUNT VERNON/E W E 24-0:S FRANKLIN PLEASANT VIEW 291 3,528 3,790 227 240 22.0 22.5 1(L844 ~650 2Q_,J,_l_3 ~_059 69-04 STONE RURAL SPECIAL 292 3,234 3,397 227 236 18.:S 17.5 22,961 2~270 20 .. 5 2~ 989 26 I 960 __ 69-02 STONE STONE COUNTY 293 3 162 3 898 223 234 18.5 18 8 20 093 26 395 20.5 21 104 26 885 72-09 WASHINGTON WINSLOW 294 3,124 3,551 223 236 20.0 20.4 18,706 2j.__,297 22.0 1__.,855 47-01 MISSISSIPPI ARMOREL 295 3,850 4,344 218 232 21.4 21.8 22,820 26,179 23.4 0 6 38-07 LAWRENCE STRAWBERRY 296 3 432 3 885 216 224 4 49-04 MONTGOMERY ODEN 297 3,461 3,703 215 227 24,224 63-06 SALINE PARON 298 3,994 4,3661 215 229 26 619 37_1_ _ 54-05 PHILLIPS LAKE VIEW 299 3 240 2 778 213 214 19 376 22.3 21.1 0 945 70-05 UNION MOUNT HOLLY 300 4,294 5,081 212 224 21 .. 5 24.3 22,745 23,644 23.5 27.0 5,146 65-03 SEARCY SAINT JOE 301 3,678 4,116 202 214 19.5 19.5 19,352 23,262 21.5 21.5 4 499 61-01 RANDOLPH BIGGERS-REYNO 302 3 205 3 428 197 206 18.6 19.0 19 721 22 032 20.6 21.0 20 653 22 895 28-06 GREENE STANFORD 303 3,357 3,548 194 201 20.1 20.5 19,263 20.., 816 22.4 22.8 20, 131~694 34-02 JACKSON GRUBBS 304 3,306 3,673 188 200 19.3 19.3 17,374 2~410 21.3 21.3 18,485 21 324 21-03 DESHA DESHA-DREW 305 3 126 3 420 182 190 11.3 10.8 18 583 21 402 13.3 12.8 21 094 24 394 34-04 JACKSON SWIFTON 306 3,474 3,563 181 191 20.1 19.6 18,578 20,946 22.1 21.6 20 019 22,423 41-03 LITTLE RIVER WINTHROP 307 3,675 3,738 169 176 14.6 14.6 20,966 23,019~.6 16.6 22 339 24,477 __ 43-05 LO\"IOKE HUMNOKE 308 3 647 3 727 169 180 15.8 17.1 18 729 19 880 17.8 19.1 19 963 21 024 53-02 PERRY PERRY CASA 309 4,405 4,182 167 184 19.2 15.7 23,028 24,809 21.2 ___JJ_._7 24,200 26,192 20-01 DALLAS CARTHAGE 310 3,483 3,725 165 172 17.5 17.5 19,528 21,383 19.5 19.5 20,894 22,722 12-05 CLEBURNE WILBURN 311 3 041 3 911 164 177 14.2 15.4 18 682 22 473 16.2 17.4 21 181 25 723 73-05 WHITE GRIFFITHVILLE 312 4,024 161 168 17.6 19,502 19.9 21 079 03-06 BAXTER TRI-COUNTY CON. 313 4,809 4,762 151 159 18.3 13.8 20,313 23,402 20.3 16.3 21,378 25,052 36-05 JOHNSON OARK 314 4 027 4 242 150 158 16.9 17.9 19 417 21 674 18.9 19.9 20 721 23 160 02-04 ASHLEY PARKDALE 315 3,169 3,231 145 152 14.7 12.8 17,735 20,021 16.7 14.8 17,592 1~~ 21-01 DESHA ARKANSAS CITY 316 6,165 6,609 145 152 18.2 17.0 22,727 23,780 20.7 19.5 25 110 26,262 50-04 NEVADA EMMET 317 2 982 3 323 143 151 13.0 12.0 19 106 23 854 15.0 14.0 20 489 25 302 71-03 VAN BUREN SCOTLAND 318 3,655 4,078 130 135 14.0 14.5 19,973 21,899 16.0 16.5 21,154 23 335 75-05 YELL FOURCHE VALLEY 319 4,346 5,125 128 136 16.4 18.2 19,128 22,348 __ 1_8.4 20.2 20,494 23,~ 31-06 HOWARD UMPIRE 320 4 781 5 471 123 127 14.9 15.6 20 349 22 369 17.8 18.5 22 124 24 559 23-02 FAULKNER ENOLA 321 3,529 121 126 13.1 17,962 14.6 19,520 68-06 SHARP POUGHKEEPSIE 322 3,842 3,5981 115 120 15.1 14.0 18,377 19,044 17.1 16.0 19,478 19,503 65-04 SEARCY WITTS SPRINGS 323 5 293 5 726 I 94 99 14.8 14.8 18 050 20 234 16.8 16.8 19 145 21 278 71-01 VAN BUREN ALREAD 324 4,920 5,270 93 99 13.1 13.1 19,780 21,502 15.2 15.3 21,262 23,133 -- --------- LEA,:, COUNTY 60-01 PULASKI 60-03 PUL SKI 66-01 SEBASTIAN 60-02 PULASKI 63-03 62-01 70-01 58-05 43-04 16-08 17-05 47-02 4-03 04-01 52-04 63-02 35-09 27-05 03-03 26-03 29-03 14-02 26-05 73-ii 35-10 19-05 02-01 39-04 30-04 05-03 15-07 18-04 32-01 01-04 66-02 21-04 28-08 17-01 04-06 10-02 CRITTENDEN HILLER F KNER SALINE ST FRANCIS UNION POPE LONOKE CRAIGHEAD CRAWFORD MISSISSIPPI PHILLIPS BENTON OUACHITA SALINE JEFFERSON GRANT AXTER GARLAND HEMPSTEAD COLUMBIA GARLAND WHITE JEFFERSON CROSS ASHLEY LEE HOT SPRING BOONE CONWAY CRITTENDEN INDEPENDENCE ARKANSAS SEBASTIAN DESHA GREENE CRAWFORD BENTON CLARK ARKANSAPSU BLIC SCHOOLD ISTRICTS ANNUALFI SCAL REPORTA NALYSIS COLUMN 4 RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER PAGE NO. 31 DI BRYANT FORREST CITY EL DORADO RUSSELLVILLE CABOT JONESBORO VAN BUREN BLYTHEVILLE HELE -W S BENTONVILLE FAIRVIEW BENTON WATSON CHAPEL SHERIDAN MOUNTAIN HO HOT SPRINGS HOPE MAGNOLIA LAKE HAMILTON SEARCY WHITE HALL WYNNE CROSSETT MARIANNA MALVERN HARRISON SO. CONWAY CO. MARION BATESVILLE STUTTGART GREENWOOD DUMAS NORTHEAST ARKANSA ALMA SILOAM SPRINGS ARKADELPHIA 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 EXPENSE PER ADA 90-91 91-92 2,587 2 699 2,525 2,593 2 975 2,360 2,338 2 610 2,493 2,672 2 481 2,516 2,439 2,692 2,375 2,553 2 614 2,728 2,673 3 113 2,950 2,932 2 796 2,909 2,818 3 005 2,764 2,989 3 022 174.5 154.3 155.0 145.0 158 .. 5 149.9 148.6 137.5 151.4 140.5 137.0 148.9 25_,_173 24, 293 21,~8 194. 8_ _ 205. 0_2 4 662 27 786 191.0 189.0 25 9 23,808 27 357~-1~9~5~.1 192.4 24 2 23~5 27,543 197.7 199.6 2~373 28,510 23 103 2 45 200.0 00. 24 252 26 867 22,021 2~604 183.0 183.0 22--'--732 26,362 22,991 2A,373 163.3 165.2 23,976 27,642 23 250 28 587 165.8 167.8 24 263 29 621 24,102 28,037 154.8 156.8 25,111 25_,114 27,967 168.3 169.8 2~851 22 802 27 051 162.1 159.8 23 728 25,396 28,836 150.L.____!_56.6 26,332 25,061 28,513 143.5 148.0 26,197 29,752 23 495 27,217~2.7 162.6 24 277 28 050 23,431 27,669 146.8 149.8 24,749 29,088 24,071 28,077 144~~5-~14_8.0 25,273 29,350 22 384 26 027 155.8 159.3 23,404 27 122 ARKANSAS PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS ANNUAL FISCAL REPORT ANALYSIS COLUMN 4 RANKED IN DESCENDING ORDER PAGE NO. _32___ EXPENSE 1990-91 NUMBER OF AVG. SLRY. NO. Of CERT, SLRY, PER ADA _TEAQiE8S K-12 TCHRS. K-12 EEBSONNEL E'ERS. 90-91 91-92 0-91 91-92 90-91___'l1._-92 90-21 21-92 JACKSON GRE NE MISSISSIPPI MISSISSIPPI GR AN DREW MONTICELLO LITTLE RIVER ASHDOWN 3 - ,., FE' ON A 47-06 MISSISSIPPI SO MISSISSIPPI 3,400 06-02 BRADLEY WARREN 2,809 61-03 RANDOLPH POCAHONTAS 2 8 4 57-03 POLK MENA 2,494 2,927 iL697 1,786 113.5 24,930 28_,810 117.9 25,675 29...,642 31-05 HOWARD NASHVILLE 2,514 2,943 1,690 1,771 109.2 110.2 23,172 26,948 116.5 21,_028 27..,_762 43-01 LONOKE LONOKE 2 390 2 814 1 661 1 740 104.9 07.4 22 918 26 479 111.1 23 78 27 5 0 02-03 ASHLEY HAMBURG 62 2,729 2,984 1,630 1,714 109.5 110.0 21,956 25_, 346 117.2 23,234 26__,604 56-05 POINSETT TRUMANN 63 2,655 2,939 1,568 1,673 115.1 111.9 21_.,_395 25_, 291 124.8 120.6 22_.,_393 26_,245 73-02 WHITE BEEBE 64 2 335 2 763 1 575 1 670 103.4 106.7 21 807 26 192 109.6 113.9 22 683 26 867 44-01 MADISON HUNTSVILLE 65 2,493 2,908 1,566 1,666 104.6 105.9 22,473 27,092 109.6 110.9 23,110 27,761 16-11 CRAIGHEAD NETTLETON 66 2,572 2,909 1,539 1,638 102.5 110.1 22,004 24,966 111.3 118.5 22.L963 25,949 23-07 FAULKNER VILONIA 67 2 455 3 029 1 542 i 614 97.0 101.0 23 538 27 980 104.0 109.0 24 352 28 878 23-03 FAULKNER GREENBRIER 68 2,344 2,902 1,505 1,586 87.5 99.0 24,801 27L934 93.5 104.5 25,713 28_.,__921 36-01 JOHNSON CLARKSVILLE 69 2,363 2,750 1,490 1,560 97.5 102.0 22,571 25_,660 102.5 107.0 23,479 26,759 67-01 SEVIER DEQUEEN 70 2 407 2 788 1 449 1 519 88.8 90.4 23 6 26 561 94.3 96 4 24 568 27 738 64-01 SCOTT WALDRON 71 2,814 3,235 1,424 1,511 109.1 108.5 21,944 24,952 115.3 115.3 22,658 25,840 40-03 LINCOLN STAR CITY 72 2,~11 2,896 1,450 1,506 91.9 92.3 22,897 26,320 100.6 102.0 24,005 27,384 75-04 YELL DARDANELLE 73 2 606 2 836 1 335 1 409 91.9 90.5 21 614 24 497 97.2 96.3 22 307 25 274 24-04 FRANKLIN OZARK 74 2,499 2,874 1,322 1,400 85.5 87.5 22,725 25,873 91.9 93.8 23,698 26,926 73-01 WHITE BALD KNOB 75 2,701 3,031 1,322 1,397 86.4 84.8 22,921 26,642 91.9 90.9 23,756 27,616 08-01 CARROLL BERRYVILLE 76 2 231 2 610 1 331 1 393 84.0 88.0 21 773 25 257 88.0 92.0 22 371 25 847 12-02 CLEBURNE HEBER SPRINGS 77 2,480 2,944 1,300 1,382 89.5 91.5 22,139 26,271 94.9 97.2 22,990 27,210 01-01 ARKANSAS DEWITT 78 2,718 3,109 1,317 1,378 92.7 94.7 23,157 26,141 98.9 101.1 24,016 27,140 48-01 MONROE BRINKLEY 79 2 399 2 800 1 264 1 338 89.1 87.1 20 413 23 896 95.1 93.1 21 121 24 460 42-01 LOGAN BOONEVILLE 80 2,499 2,901 1,256 1,328 73.9 75.6 24,567 29,031 80.4 81.1 25,796 30,124 09-03 CHICOT LAKESIDE 81 2,617 2,973 1,216 1,310 86.3 86.0 20,759 23,497 92.3 92.0 21,660 24,566 16-02 CRAIGHEAD WEST SIDE 82 2 477 2 839 1 229 1 310 81.8 82.1 21 231 24 726 89.8 90.1 22 227 25 797 20-02 DALLAS FORDYCE 83 3,087 3,474 1,249 1,303 88.7 88.0 22,429 25,216 95.7 94.0 23,368 26_,245 68-04 SHARP HIGHLAND 84 2,418 2,674 1,229 1,290 75.5 79.0 22,162 24,775 80.5 84.0 23,154 25,869 21-05 DESHA MCGEHEE 85 2 357 2 619 1 227 1 276 79.S 81.0 22 334 25 180 84.5 86.0 23 200 26 226 42-03 LOGAN PARIS 86 2,638 2,817 1,192 1,260 82.0 82.2 23,725 26,602 87.9 88.1 24,571 27,499 11-01 CLAY CORNING 87 2,465 2,900 1,187 1,250 82.5 80.9 21,926 26,340 88.0 86.4 22,844 27,340 50-06 NEVADA PRESCOTT 88 2 567 2 862 1 162 1 210 84.3 83.3 21 144 24 028 91.3 90.2 22 078 25 149 09-01 CHICOT DERMOTT 89 2,502 2,780 1,123 1,193 74.3 73.0 24,145 26,991 79.3 78.0 25,129 28,122 58-02 POPE DOVER 90 2,465 2,857 1,113 1,177 70.0 73.0 23,319 26,826 75.0 78.0 24,022 27,664 08-03 CARROLL GREEN FOREST 91 2 430 2 769 1 071 1 126 71.3 72.5 21 586 24 559 77.0 78.5 22 420 25 469 71-02 VAN BUREN CLINTON 92 2,463 2,829 1,073 1,126 70.3 74.0 22,278 25,652 75.0 79.0 23,318 ~~ 32-09 INDEPENDENCE SOUTH SIDE 93 2,586 3,002 1,039 1,103 69.7 73.0 22,643 26,433 76.0 80.0 23,544 27,356 62-02 ST FRANCIS HUGHES 94 2 727 3 119 1 058 1 099 75.5 76.5 22 664 25 381 83.4 84.3 23 741 26 598 38-04 LAWRENCE 09-02 CHICOT 16-03 CRAIGHEAD 37-03 LAFAYETTE 54-Q.4 PHILLIPS 30-02 HOT SPRING ARKANSASP IIBI re SCHOOLD ISTRICT$ ANNUALE lSCAL REPORTA NALYSIS BROOKLAND STAMPS HARVELL GLEN ROSE CROSS COUNTY PERRYVILLE SHAC \\/ER YELLVILLE-SUMMIT RIVERSIDE OLUl1N 4- BANKED...IN DESCENDING ORDER EXPENSE PEFLADA _9Q::_91_ 91-92 NUMBERO F 65.2 65.0 63.8 59.9 59.8 68.2 59.4 64.5 60 .. 2 58.1 56.8 62 .. S 61.1 64.0 55.5 54.0 58.7 58.8 57.0 54.0 51.7 60.0 53.5 52.4 57.6 56.0 56.5 59.0 54.0 52.0 50.5 52 .. 7 49 .. 5 54.7 49.0 51.6 AY~. SLRY. NO, OF CERT. ~T~C=H=R=S=~K~-~1=2~--P~ERSONNEL 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 8 9 10 27 570 75.0 75.0 400 72.6 75.3 042 69.0 69.0 225 68.8 73.4 794 76.5 76.0 25,736 74.7 74.7 24 946 72.0 75.8 24 753 67.4 69.5 23,000 76.0 76.7 27,971 62.5 67.5 23 340 26 548 64.0 68.3 21,499 24,299 69.4 70.2 23,968 26,910 73.2 69.2 21 791 24 279 69.0 67.8 22,618 27,508 64.8 64.4 21,804 25,099 72.6 64.9 20 335 23 052 69.0 73.2 20,860 24,222 66.4 64.4 20,832 24,557 69.5 68.5 23 248 27 539 62.3 63.7 24,097 27,353 60.3 60.3 21 794 24 954 62.2 61.6 4 393 27 180 67.0 67.0 20,867 25 353 66.0 65.1 20 983 24,052 68.0 67.5 22 887 28 382 60.5 60.5 22,833 27,336 57.0 57.0 21,915 24,938 61.7 62.2 23 408 25 834 62.8 63.5 22,276 25,284 63.4 61.2 23,866 27,882 56.6 58.0 22 743 25 741 56.5 55.2 20,372 23,814 65.8 65.2 22,719 26,790 53.9 56 .. :S 23 765 27,066 54.8 56.4 21,660 24,347 58.0 61.1 21,364 23,937 63.0 60.0 20 599 24 198 62.0 60.5 21 348 24,708 63.8 63.8 23,099 26,583 57.0 58.0 23 170 27 850 51.3 55.0 23,320 27,812 54.5 54.5 22,384 26,159 54.7 55.7 22 977 26 960 51.5 52.5 21,391 23,965 57.7 57.7 24,145 28,048 51.0 52.3 20 793 23 340 53.5 54.6 PAGE NO. 33 CERT. 90-91 11 24,663 22 619 24 492 24 414 23 881 23 487 23,037 22 351 21,078 25,660 24,204 22,440 24,955 22 612 23,505 23,193 21,113 22,017 21,680 24,437 25,116 22,779 25 672 21,649 21,675 24 258 23,763 22,802 24,420 23,274 24,795 23 534 21,367 23,797 24,945 22,574 22,383 21,467 22,079 23,966 24,117 24,117 23,111 23,926 22,211 25,200 21,850 SLRY. PERS. 91-92 12 28,238 27 459 27 986 27 141 26 957 26 948 25 910 25 564 23,844 28,714 27,317 25,281 27,781 25 086 28,858 26,462 23,894 25,501 25,556 28,466 28,311 25,790 28 428 26,249 24,759 29,298 28,354 25,858 27,038 25,953 28,992 26,712 24,893 27,602 28,160 25,422 25,126 25,059 25,468 27,267 28,803 28,609 26,870 27,902 24,796 29,180 24,201 - - -- - ---- ------------ ----------------------------- LEA,:, COUNTY 17-02 CRAWFORD 4A 02 MTI I ER 54 02 PHILLIPS 32 06 INDEPENDENCE 54 01 PHILLIPS 65-02 SEARCY 50-08 NEVADA 72-01 WASHINGTON 04-07 BENTON 58-04 POPE 24-02 FRANKLIN 23-05 FAULKNER 43-03 LONOKE 05-02 BOONE 13-03 CLEVELAND 72-04 WASHINGTON 62-05 ST FRANCIS 59-01 PRAIRIE 74-01 WOODRUFF 25-02 FULTON 58-03 POPE 28-03 GREENE 36-06 JOHNSON __ 63-01 SALINE 16-01 CRAIGHEAD 70-07 UNION 48-02 MONROE 08-02 CARROLL -- 06-01 BRADLEY 26-07 GARLAND 32-11 INDEPENDENCE 63-04 SALINE 37-02 LAFAYETTE 73-09 WHITE 31-02 HOWARD 12-03 CLEBURNE 26-04 GARLAND 73-06 WHITE 19-03 CROSS 41-02 LITTLE RIVER 24-03 FRANKLIN 55-04 PIKE 70-06 UNION --30-03 HOT SPRING 35-01 JEFFERSON 51-02 NEWTON 73-03 WHITE ARKANSAPSU BLICS CHOOLD ISTRICTSA NNUAFLI SCAL REPORTA NALYSIS COLUMN 4 ANKED IN DESCENDING ORD R EXPENSE 1990-'11 NUMBEORF AVG. SLRY. F'ER ADA TEACHERS K-12 TCHRS . K-12 90-91 91-92 A/D/A A/D/M 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 DT!'lTRICT \"'\"NK 1 ? 3 4 s 6 7 A CEDARVILLE 142 2 591 2 906 708 760 50.7 50.4 23 371 26 507 :c-tJnA rC\"\u0026gt;.JTCAI ....... ?.A7? ~ -..ncc 7f\\\"\u0026lt; 7AO \"'\" 0 !'ii 0 ':)':) 779 ':)CC Q':),J.. ELAINE 144 2 774 3 144 698 744 53.0 54.0 20 938 23 921 NEWARK 145 5 384 5 823 711 742 70.0 70.1 28 616 28 774 BARTON/LEXA 146 2 453 2 905 710 741 45.0 47.0 '\"\u0026gt;2 438 26 247 MARSHALL 147 2 646 2 965 697 736 50.5 51.5 21 313 24 246 NEVADA COUNTY 148 2,638 3,031 692 731 48.1 49.0 21 590 24 755 ELKINS 149 2 691 3 336 683 722 45.4 46.4 22 933 28 969 PEA RIDGE 150 2 659 3 153 679 720 51.1 52 .. 5 20 828 24 170 POTTSVILLE 151 2,557 2,812 671 707 45 .. 0 48.0 25,001 26,620 CHARLESTON 152 2 560 2 969 678 702 47.0 49.0 22 853 25 850 MAYFLOWER 153 2,356 2,883 667 701 44 .. 5 47.0 21,680 25,128 CARLISLE 154 2,668 2,961 669 696 48.2 47.7 22,134 25,011 BERGMAN 155 2 559 3 029 665 694 42.2 46.1 23 322 26 319 RISON 156 2,366 2,886 663 689 44.8 44.7 22 378 27 958 GREENLAND 157 2,404 3,172 651 689 43.0 44.3 21,167 27,310 PALESTINE/WHEATLE158 2 768 2 916 656 681 48.0 44.0 21 968 24 550 DES ARC 159 2,329 2,791 642 676 40.7 41.9 21,648 25 241 AUGUSTA 160 2,649 3,108 639 673 46.2 46.2 20,958 23,980 SALEM 161 2 628 2 937 641 672 47.8 48.8 20 407 23 401 HECTOR 162 2,650 3,051 633 667 46.0 47.0 22,406 25 015 MARMADUKE 163 2,488 2 767 629 658 40.6 40.6 23 344 27 541 WEST SIDE 164 2 615 2 931 622 657 44.4 45.9 22 259 24 808 BAUXITE 165 3,039 3 401 621 656 39 .. 5 40.0 25,259 28,632 BAY-BROWN 166 2,683~,073 619 648 42.7 42.7 21,575 25 787 PARKERS CHAPEL 167 2 549 3 004 618 643 44.6 45.6 21 989 26 020 CLARENDON 168 2,504_ 3,013 606 637 42.0 42.0 19 908 24 849 EUREKA SPRINGS 169 2,430 2,756 595 625 40.8 41.5 21,305 24,147 HERMITAGE 170 2 568 2 972 589 624 40.0 41.0 21 319 23 910 MOUNTAIN PINE 171 2 678 2 979 583 622 43.5 43.5 21,482 25 103 MIDLAND 172 2J6'l.7 3,003 582 618 44.4 45 .. 2 21 141 24 131 HARMONY GROVE 173 2 564 3 033 591 618 38.5 41 .. 5 23 031 25 728 LEWISVILLE 174 2 970~J.84 579 612 43.3 40.3 22 519 26 079 PANGBURN 175 2,776 3 195 568 597 42 ...0 42.7 21,758 24 359 DIERKS 176 2 492 2 866 573 596 39.2 40.2 21 712 26 081 QUITMAN 177 2,608 2,903 562 594 39.5 38.2 22,919 26,206 JESSIEVILLE 178 3, 45__b 321 566 593 41.7 41.7 27,093 27,444 JUDSONIA 179 2 626 554 592 38.0 22 494 PARKIN 180 2,736 3,509 554 591 42.0 42.3 20,121 23,897 FOREMAN 181 2,988 3 142 569 590 43.6 42.6 21 414 24,109 COUNTY LINE 182 2 830 3 086 555 588 44.3 40.7 19 945 24 416 MURFREESBORO 183 2,727~.144 555 583 44.2 43.3 22,202 25,552 NORPHLET 184 2,607 2,883 563 583 41.0 4l .. O 23,212 26,417 MAGNET COVE 185 3 014 3 172 553 582 43.9 42.0 21 175 23 619 ALTHEIMER-SHERRIL186 2,847 3,139 549 581 39.4 40.4 19,907 22,626 JASPER 187 2,778 3,_203 555 581 37.6 37.6 23,619 27,283 BRADFORD 188 2 627 2 989 547 575 39.7 40.0 21 833 25 472 PAGE NO. JL,. NO. Of CERT. AVG. SLRY. PERSONNEL CERT . PERS . 90-91 91-92 90-91 91-92 9 1n  1? 53.7 53.4 24 312 27 503 ,.,..,\" ' CCA r, ~-. \u0026lt;\"\u0026gt;\u0026lt;\u0026gt;L \".\u0026gt;7 1Q7 56.6 56.6 21 778 25 043 75.3 75.4 29 495 29 644 48.n 5n.n \"'3 6\"0 ?7 440 53.5 54.5 22 120 24 725 51.1 52.0 22 489 25 675 48.4 49.4 23 955 29 881 54.2 55.5 21 783 25 149 48.0 51.0 25,738 27 432 50.0 52.0 23 825 26 923 47.5 50.0 22,604 26,056 51.1 50.7 23 184 26 163 45.3 49.2 24 596 27 627 47.8 47.7 23,383 29,055 46.0 47.3 22,285 28,225 52.0 48.0 22 901 25 470 43.8 45.0 22,547\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "}],"pages":{"current_page":2,"next_page":null,"prev_page":1,"total_pages":2,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":12,"total_count":22,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":true},"facets":[{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":22}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"Arkansas. Department of Education","hits":8},{"value":"United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)","hits":2},{"value":"A. Philip Randolph Institute","hits":1},{"value":"AFL-CIO. Civil Rights Department","hits":1},{"value":"Hill, Norman, 1933-","hits":1},{"value":"Kehrer, E.T., 1921-1996","hits":1},{"value":"Mater, Dan H.","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"Education--Arkansas","hits":20},{"value":"Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","hits":11},{"value":"Educational statistics","hits":10},{"value":"Little Rock School District","hits":10},{"value":"Arkansas. Department of Education","hits":8},{"value":"Educational law and legislation","hits":7},{"value":"Educational planning","hits":7},{"value":"School integration","hits":6},{"value":"Education and state","hits":5},{"value":"School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","hits":5},{"value":"School improvement programs","hits":4}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Hill, Norman, 1933-","hits":1},{"value":"Kehrer, E. T., 1921-1996","hits":1},{"value":"Mater, Dan H.","hits":1},{"value":"Pollard, William Edward, 1915-2013","hits":1},{"value":"Randolph, A. Philip (Asa Philip), 1889-1979","hits":1},{"value":"Scarlett, Oliver W.","hits":1},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"name_authoritative_sms","items":[{"value":"Hill, Norman, 1933-","hits":1},{"value":"Kehrer, E. T., 1921-1996","hits":1},{"value":"Randolph, A. Philip (Asa Philip), 1889-1979","hits":1},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":22},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":21},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":20},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":13}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Arkansas","hits":21}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1997","hits":7},{"value":"1992","hits":6},{"value":"1991","hits":5},{"value":"1994","hits":5},{"value":"1995","hits":5},{"value":"1993","hits":4},{"value":"1996","hits":4},{"value":"1998","hits":4},{"value":"1999","hits":4},{"value":"2002","hits":4},{"value":"1990","hits":3},{"value":"2000","hits":3},{"value":"2001","hits":3},{"value":"1986","hits":2},{"value":"2003","hits":2},{"value":"2004","hits":2},{"value":"1979","hits":1},{"value":"1989","hits":1},{"value":"2005","hits":1},{"value":"2010","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"1979","max":"2010","count":67,"missing":0},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":10},{"value":"reports","hits":4},{"value":"judicial records","hits":2},{"value":"booklets","hits":1},{"value":"directories","hits":1},{"value":"exhibition (associated concept)","hits":1},{"value":"files (document groupings)","hits":1},{"value":"memorandums","hits":1},{"value":"project management","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":22}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Office of Desegregation Management","hits":21},{"value":"AFL-CIO Southeast Division Civil Rights Department Records","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":21},{"value":"Georgia State University. Special Collections","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":22}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":22}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}