{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"suc_gravely_173","title":"Flora MacDonald oral history interview, 1989 December 1","collection_id":"suc_gravely","collection_title":"William Gravely Oral History Collection on the Lynching of Willie Earle","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, South Carolina, Greenville County, Greenville, 34.85262, -82.39401"],"dcterms_creator":["MacDonald, Flora","Gravely, William"],"dc_date":["1989-12-01"],"dcterms_description":["An oral history interview by William Gravely with Flora MacDonald on December 1, 1989. Topics covered in the interview include MacDonald's personal and spiritual reflections on the lynching of Willie Earle, her personal philosophy, and memories of the community's reaction to the lynching. A draft transcript is included."],"dc_format":["audio/mpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Columbia, S.C. : University of South Carolina. Department of Oral History, University Libraries"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Call Number: GRA 034","William Gravely Oral History Collection on the Lynching of Willie Earle"],"dcterms_subject":["African Americans--South Carolina--History--20th century","African Americans--South Carolina--Interviews","Civil rights--South Carolina","Lynching--South Carolina--Greenville","Trials(Murder)--South Carolina--Greenville","Greenville County (S.C.)--Race Relations--History"],"dcterms_title":["Flora MacDonald oral history interview, 1989 December 1"],"dcterms_type":["Sound"],"dcterms_provenance":["South Caroliniana Library"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://cdm17173.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/gravely/id/173"],"dcterms_temporal":["1946/1969"],"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Copyright: University of South Carolina. The transcript and audio are provided for individual research purposes only; for all other uses, including publication, reproduction, and quotation beyond fair use, permission must be obtained in writing from: Department of Oral History, University Libraries, University of South Carolina."],"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)"],"dcterms_extent":["30:55"],"dlg_subject_personal":["MacDonald, Flora","Earle, Willie, 1922-1947"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"suc_gravely_177","title":"J.W. Henderson oral history interview, 1989 December, part 1","collection_id":"suc_gravely","collection_title":"William Gravely Oral History Collection on the Lynching of Willie Earle","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, South Carolina, Greenville County, Greenville, 34.85262, -82.39401"],"dcterms_creator":["Henderson, J.W.","Gravely, William"],"dc_date":["1989-12"],"dcterms_description":["An oral history interview by William Gravely in December 1989 with Reverend J.W. Henderson, with occasional contributions by A.J. Whittenberg (who was also interviewed seperately on another occasion). Topics included in the interview were the geography of the area where the lynching occurred, details regarding Willie Earle's habits and general biography, and updates on various people involved in the incident and its aftermath. A brief summary and correspondence between William Gravely and J.W. Henderson are included."],"dc_format":["audio/mpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Columbia, S.C. : University of South Carolina. Department of Oral History, University Libraries"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Call Number: GRA 027","William Gravely Oral History Collection on the Lynching of Willie Earle"],"dcterms_subject":["African Americans--South Carolina--History--20th century","African Americans--South Carolina--Interviews","Civil rights--South Carolina","Lynching--South Carolina--Greenville","Trials(Murder)--South Carolina--Greenville","Greenville County (S.C.)--Race Relations--History"],"dcterms_title":["J.W. Henderson oral history interview, 1989 December, part 1"],"dcterms_type":["Sound"],"dcterms_provenance":["South Caroliniana Library"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://cdm17173.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/gravely/id/177"],"dcterms_temporal":["1946/1969"],"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Copyright: University of South Carolina. The transcript and audio are provided for individual research purposes only; for all other uses, including publication, reproduction, and quotation beyond fair use, permission must be obtained in writing from: Department of Oral History, University Libraries, University of South Carolina."],"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)"],"dcterms_extent":["90:33"],"dlg_subject_personal":["Henderson, J.W.","Earle, Willie, 1922-1947"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"suc_gravely_127","title":"J.W. Henderson oral history interview, 1989 December, part 2","collection_id":"suc_gravely","collection_title":"William Gravely Oral History Collection on the Lynching of Willie Earle","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, South Carolina, Greenville County, Greenville, 34.85262, -82.39401"],"dcterms_creator":["Henderson, J.W.","Gravely, William"],"dc_date":["1989-12"],"dcterms_description":["An oral history interview by William Gravely in December 1989 with Reverend J.W. Henderson, with occasional contributions by A.J. Whittenberg (who was also interviewed seperately on another occasion). Topics included in the interview were the geography of the area where the lynching occurred, details regarding Willie Earle's habits and general biography, and updates on various people involved in the incident and its aftermath. A brief summary and correspondence between William Gravely and J.W. Henderson are included."],"dc_format":["audio/mpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Columbia, S.C. : University of South Carolina. Department of Oral History, University Libraries"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Call Number: GRA 027","William Gravely Oral History Collection on the Lynching of Willie Earle"],"dcterms_subject":["African Americans--South Carolina--History--20th century","African Americans--South Carolina--Interviews","Civil rights--South Carolina","Lynching--South Carolina--Greenville","Trials(Murder)--South Carolina--Greenville","Greenville County (S.C.)--Race Relations--History"],"dcterms_title":["J.W. Henderson oral history interview, 1989 December, part 2"],"dcterms_type":["Sound"],"dcterms_provenance":["South Caroliniana Library"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://cdm17173.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/gravely/id/127"],"dcterms_temporal":["1946/1969"],"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Copyright: University of South Carolina. The transcript and audio are provided for individual research purposes only; for all other uses, including publication, reproduction, and quotation beyond fair use, permission must be obtained in writing from: Department of Oral History, University Libraries, University of South Carolina."],"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)"],"dcterms_extent":["90:33"],"dlg_subject_personal":["Henderson, J.W.","Earle, Willie, 1922-1947"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_394","title":"Little Rock School District (LRSD) Preliminary Desegregation Plan'","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1989-12-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Educational planning","School integration","School improvement programs"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District (LRSD) Preliminary Desegregation Plan'"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/394"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["31 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nLRSD PRELIMINARY DESEGREGATION PLAN December 1, 1989 ,'5'' _ .   V. IThe Desegregation of the Little Rock School District -7 Preliminary Plans (Revised) December 1, 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Demographics II. Schools III. Instruction IV. School Climate V. Staffing VI. Student Assignment Plan VII. Staff Development VIII. Parent and Community Support IX. Monitoring and Evaluation X. Funding XI. Critical Events Calendar Appendices A. Long-Range District Goals B. Administrative Organization of the Little Rock School District 1 A Message to Our Community: V. Three days after the Supreme Court's decision in Brown ^ard of Education, the Little Rock School Board issued , a formal statement of its intent to comply with the requirements of the Constitution, follows: The statement read as It is our responsibility to comply with Federal Constitutional requirements, we intend to do so when the Supreme Court of the United States outlines the and method to be followed. Three and a half decades later the issue of school desegregation remains unresolved in our city. No matter what strategies have been attempted, no matter how many plans have been proposed, the desegregation of the Little Rock School District has remained a goal which we have not yet achieved. Even more disquieting is the fact that despite hundreds even thousands of hours of remedial education for students and technical assistance for teachers, the academic schievement of black and white students continues to reflect wide disparities. On standardized achievement tests last year, a difference of over 25 percentile points separated the average achievement of black and white students in our schools. It is painfully clear that not only has the District been unable to achieve racial balance, it has also been unsuccessful in educating many of its black students. i When one pauses to consider the reason why \"separate but egual Itschools were declared unconstitutional in the first place, the gravity of this failure becomes even more appalling. desegregation plan that does not succeed in reducing the disparity in educational achievement between minority and non-minority students cannot be successful. One must ask why a community that has struggled with this issue for so long has not yet been able to accomplish the desegregation of its schools. One reason is the loss of white students from the District, a loss which has occurred over the years because of enrollment in private schools, movement of middle class families to surrounding districts. and a decline in the birth rate of white children. At the same time that the District has dealt with the effects dwindling numbers of white students, it has also had to of educate an increasing number of minority students, who, as we know, are disproportionately represented among the poor and disadvantaged. at A Whatever the reasons for the District's inability to desegregate its schools, it is clear that until our community realizes the importance of attaining this goal and commits to making it happen, school desegregation will never become a reality. The Federal Court can, and will. issue orders which protect the constitutional rights of school children\nhowever, the Court cannot change the hearts and minds of people, and that, in the end, will determine the degree and quality of any community's its schools. efforts to desegregate i iOnce again we have an opportunityperhaps our lastto achieve quality desegregated education in Little Rock. What we accomplish, or fail to accomplish, during the next few months will determine whether we enter the 21st century with excellent schools for all children or whether we are forced to retreat, perhaps permanently, into the backwaters of educational mediocrity. We must not leave, as our legacy to our children, inferior, mediocre schools in a system worse off than it was when this litigation began, only unthinkable but also unconscionable. To do so is not In the weeks ahead our patrons, staff, and students will have opportunities to discuss the ideas contained in these preliminary plans. Many of the proposals have come from you. Others seem like good ideas to us, but you may find reasons why things should be done differently. Also, you may think of other ideas. We invite your comments and opinions\nwe want and need your support. We will be working hard to write a constitutional plan to desegregate schools and stabilize our community. In the end we want to be proud of what we have our accomplished and confident that we have done our very best for all of our children. We believe we can do that if together we commit ourselves to the task and support each iiiother in our efforts to attain once-and-for-all the goal stated so eloquently by the Little Rock School Board over thirty-five years ago. Ruth Steele Superintendent of Schools November 1, 1989 ivI. DEMOGRAPHICS A. Enrollment Trends in the Little Rock School District B. Population Trends in Little Rock C. Population Trends in Pulaski County D. Implications I. DEMOGRAPHICS The purpose of this section is to review the demographics of the Little Rock School District. As a result of the focus on interdistrict transfers in Pulaski County, some attention will also be given to the demographics of the North Little Rock and Pulaski County School Districts. The Little Rock School District covers ninety-one square miles. Until the recent Chenal Valley annexation, the boundaries of the Little Rock School District were coterminous with the boundaries of the city of Little Rock. Although the population of the city of Little Rock is approximately two-thirds white, the District's enrollment (25,972 students) is 64 percent black. The North Little Rock School District is on the northern boundary of the Little Rock School District. The North Little Rock School District covers twenty-six square miles and comprises nearly all of the city of North Little Rock. The North Little Rock School District has approximately 9,500 students and is 44 percent black. Both districts are surrounded by the Pulaski County School District which covers 729 square miles and approximately 22,000 students. The Pulaski County Special School District is approximately 25 percent black. This section will review three areas related to the demographics of the Little Rock School District: 1. Enrollment trends in the Little Rock School District 2 . Population trends in Little Rock -2- 3. Population trends in Pulaski County A. Enrollment Trends in the Little Rock School District For several years the Little Rock School District has been under federal court order to maintain racial balance within its schools. The racial composition of the school district has shifted slowly in the past several years as a result of a gradual increase in the number of black students attending Little Rock schools and in their proportion of the total enrollment. In 1980-81, black enrollment totaled approximately 13,000 or 63.6 percent of the total enrollment of 20,500 students. By the 1986-87 school year, the number of black students had grown to almost 13,800 or 71.3 percent of the total enrollment of 19,300 students. During the period from 1980 to 1987, the District's black enrollment experienced a 6 percent increase. During the same period, however, the total enrollment experienced a 6 percent decrease in students. The District's black enrollment has continued to grow since annexation in 1987. During the period from October 1987 to October 1988, the black enrollment increased from 16,268 to 16,684 students. This represents a 2.5 percent increase in black students. The black enrollment increased by five students from October 1988 to October 1989. During the period from October 1987 to October 1989, the total enrollment experienced a 3 percent decrease in students. The steady decrease in total enrollment during a period of growth for the black enrollment can be attributed to a -3- steady decrease in the District's white enrollment. The white enrollment decreased by 7 percent (655 students - excluding 1987-88 twelfth graders) from October 1987 to October 1988. The white enrollment decreased by 5 percent (416 students - excluding 1988-89 twelfth graders) from October 1988 to October 1989. It is apparent that the District will have to reverse this trend in order to effectively desegregate its schools. The October 1989 kindergarten enrollment appears to be the first sign of change in the pattern of declining white enrollment. The white kindergarten enrollment experienced a 10 percent decline from October 1987 (634 white students) to October 1988 (570 white students). However, the white kindergarten enrollment increased by 10 percent (59 students) from October 1988 (570 students) to October 1989 (629 students). This growth can be attributed to the use of A attendance zc^es and, kindergarten attendance law, a law which still gives parents to some degree, the new mandatory the option to waive kindergarten attendance or attend private/parochial kindergarten. It should also be noted that the District's four-year-old program is approximately 32 percent white. The new attendance zones, the mandatory kindergarten attendance law, and the success of the four-year- old program are good indicators of an upswing in white enrollment. -4- B. Population Trends in Little Rock During the last three decades, Little Rock has experienced a 1.5 to 2.0 percent annual average population increase. However, most of the increase has been caused by annexation rather than new residents. Approximately 0.5 percent of the average annual population increase was related to new residents. The 1.5 to 2.0 percent growth rate is expected to continue through 2010. According to the City of Little Rock, the northwest sector of the city has experienced the largest population growth since 1980. This section includes the area around Pleasant Valley, Rock Creek, Highway 10, and 1-430. The growth in northwest Little Rock can be traced to new residents in this area. The secondary growth area of the city is in southwest Little Rock. In both northwest and southwest Little Rock, some of the growth can be attributed to movement from central and east Little Rock. However, southwest Little Rock has received most of the movement from central and east Little Rock. Unlike northwest Little Rock, annexa 'l ion has not been a significant factor in the growth of southwest Little Rock. The downtown area (central and east Little Rock) has experienced a decline in population since 1980. As indicated above, relocation continues to occur from central and east Little Rock in northwest and southwest Little Rock. The density of the downtown area is too high for new developments, unless existing structures are removed. As a result, central and east Little Rock are expected to experience decline in the future. Some of the residents in central and east Little Rock are relocating in west central Little Rock near 1-630. The black percentage is gradually increasing in neighborhoods in the area of Kanis, Barrow Road, and 36th Street. Also, neighborhoods around 12th Street, Fair Park Boulevard, and UALR have changed from predominantly white to predominantly black populations in the last two decades. Unlike central and east Little Rock, growth in west central Little Rock has been aided by the availability and construction of apartment complexes and homes for first-time homeowners. Metroplan's 1986 population estimates indicate substantial new residential construction in much of the annexed territory, and considerable increase in population as well. Most of the homes sold recently in the annexed territory are in Mabelvale. Also, substantial growth is expected to occur on the city's western borders. There are still several large tracts of undeveloped land now prime for development. A number of major residential, commercial. or institutional construction projects are currently being completed or were recently completed. It is apparent that the city has three distinct demographic areas: northwest Little Rock, southwest Little Rock, and the central, east, and west central area of Little Rock (also referred to as the 1-630 Corridor). In terms of -6- racial populations, northwest Little Rock is predominantly white\nsouthwest Little Rock is majority white but has more integrated neighborhoods than the other sectors of the city\nand the 1-630 Corridor is predominantly black in the east and experiencing considerable black migration in the west. It is also apparent that more growth is expected in northwest Little Rock and southwest Little Rock. The downtown Little Rock area is expected to continue to experience a decline in population. C. Population Trends in Pulaski County Pulaski County is expected to experience substantial growth during the next two decades. UALR projects the population of Pulaski County to reach more than 441,000 by the year 2000, an increase of more than 100,500 or 29.6 percent over the 1980 population of 340,600. Metroplan has a somewhat higher projection. The County is expected to reach more than 474,000 persons by 2000 (an increase of 39.3 percent over 1980), and 530,000 by the year 2010, a gain of over 189,000 persons or 55.6 percent in just thirty years. In regard to areas of growth, the population growth rate is slightly higher for areas north of the Arkansas River. In 1970, the population north of the River accounted for 38.4 percent of the County's population. By 1980, the population north of the River was 40 percent of the County. Areas of large gain north of the River include portions of Sherwood and Jacksonville. -/- Another area of growth in Pulaski County is the area immediately west of the Little Rock School District's western border. Some of the growth in northwest Little Rock referred to earlier will actually occur in areas outside of the Little Rock School District. For instance, the Chenal Valley development is expected to be a major community in the next 10-20 years. The westward expansion of Pulaski County is also evident in the Crystal Hill and Maumelle areas. The Pulaski County Special School District feels that the school population in Crystal Hill and Maumelle is large enough to justify another school building to serve these areas. At present, the black population constitutes approximately 24 percent of the population in Pulaski County. By the year 2000, blacks are expected to constitute 33.7 percent, or one-third, of the Pulaski County population. The steady in-migration of blacks from rural areas in Arkansas will have a direct impact on the growth rate of blacks in Pulaski County. Most of these persons are expected to reside in the Little Rock School District. As stated earlier, the black enrollment in the Little Rock School District has experienced a steady increase over the past decade. The growth trends in Pulaski County merely reaffirm the need for more interdistrict transfers in Pulaski County. -8- D. Implications The three demographic areas in Little Rock make it easy to understand the strategies that the Little Rock School District must employ to comply with desegregation requirements. First, the District must reverse the trend of declining white enrollment in order to effectively desegregate all of its schools. Recruitment efforts directed toward private and parochial students will be futile if the District cannot maintain its present white population. A continuation of the recent increase in white kindergarten and four-year-old enrollments will not result in an overall net growth if the white population is not maintained at the upper grades. Second, although the downtown Little Rock population is expected to decline, the high density in this area will continue to be a problem for school assignments. The building capacity in the downtown area must be increased to reduce the burden of busing on black students. Third, the heavily-populated white areas in northwest and southwest Little Rock must be targeted for possible assignments to schools in the 1-630 Corridor. Both of these areas are expected to grow in the future. Fourth, the total number of white students enrolled in the Little Rock School District must increase if all of the schools in the 1-630 Corridor are going to comply with desegregation requirements. This means that the Little Rock School District must succeed in attracting private and -9- parochial students. These students must be recruited to attend area schools as well as schools in the 1-630 Corridor. Finally, the Little Rock School District cannot expect to meet desegregation requirements by relying solely on white students living in District boundaries. Pulaski County is expected to grow considerably during the next ten years. Interdistrict assignment procedures such as magnet assignment, majority-minority transfers, and Act 609 transfers are already in place for further development. Act 609 (the new choice law) will allow students outside of Pulaski County to attend the Little Rock School District. The Little Rock School District long-term desegregation plan must use every opportunity available to benefit from the demographic trends in Little Rock, Pulaski County, and central Arkansas. -10- r II. SCHOOLS A. School Organization B. Types of Schools Interdistrict Schools of Choice Intradistrict Magnets Incentive Schools Area Schools Specialty Schools C. Publicity and Information -11- II. SCHOOLS A. School Organization The present organizational configuration of schools in the Little Rock School District is as follows: K-6 elementary schools 7-9 junior high schools 10-12 senior high schools Also, there are four-year-old programs in operation in five elementary schools: Franklin, Ish, Rockefeller, Stephens, 1 and Washington. Additionally, all five high schools have kindergarten programs in conjunction with their Child Development classes. The Little Rock School District Early Childhood Task Force will be asked to recommend whether or not the high school kindergarten classes should be phased out in order to provide more continuity in the educational experience for young children. Initially, much thought was given to the elimination of the junior high school and the creation of K-8 schools or 6- 8 middle schools. For several reasons such a substantive organizational change is (noynow proposed: first, another change of this magnitude would not only be very expensive but it would also create additional instability for the community at a time when the perception of stability and continuity in our schools should be increased. Second, there will be a worsening capacity problem at the junior and senior high level for at least the next two or three years. especially when Disbar becomes an interdistrict school. -12- Instead, an internal reorganization of the junior high schools is proposed, beginning in 1990-91, using grades seven and eight for block scheduling, teaming, and other features of the H school within a school\" concept which has functioned so successfully in the middle school. Grade nine will be a pre-high school program which thoroughly prepares students for their high school experiences. A seven-period day at the junior high schools will also be instituted, beginning in 1990-91. In 1992-93 the junior high school program will be 1#^ evaluated, space needs identified, and the usefulness and the effectiveness of the junior high school structure reconsidered. By that time the benefit of studies and evaluations done by the New Futures Initiative will help make a more thorough assessment of the junior high school program. Except for these internal changes, the creation of a pre-K through 9 university laboratory school, and an expansion of early childhood programs in some schools (discussed below), the organizational structure will remain the same, at least through the 1992-93 school year. B. Types of Schools Several types of schools are proposed in this plan. They include the following: Interdistrict schools of choice Intradistrict magnets Incentive schools -13-Area schools Specialty schools Detailed descriptions for these types of schools are in the following sections. -14- Interdistrict Schools of Choice There will be three interdistrict schools of choice, with proposed student ratios of 60 percent black and 40 percent white and one. Central High School, as a limited school of choice. They are described below: Washington Basic Skills/Math-Science (Pre K-6): This school will open in 1990-91 for students who learn well in a highly-structured setting\nwho are motivated by competition which is fostered in academic, physical, and social behavior\nand who are interested in math and science. The instructional activities will be presented through teacher-centered classrooms, large-group instruction, disciplined classroom management, and standard basal textbooks, A computer lab, a math lab, a science lab, field trips, guest speakers, and specific math/science projects (math Olympiads, Invention Convention, Science Fair, and the Young Astronaut Program) will enhance the mathematics and science core programs. The goals of the Washington School will be: -to develop the highest possible competence in academic skills and concepts\n-to nurture the student's mental processes\n-to foster self-discipline\n-to develop task commitment and self-motivation\n-to develop an understanding of the relationship between the scientific process, applied mathematics, and other curriculum areas\n-to equip students at an early age with the interest and educational skills to live in the technological world of tomorrow. Washington Basic Skills/Math-Science School will be characterized as a school which will highlight the best of the past, present, and future educational values. These values will be included as concepts in developing positive learning. This school will also emphasize traditional American values in education, such as patriotism. Classroom teachers (K-6) will use the Young Astronaut Program to encourage further study in math and science, channel student interest into the pursuit of the studies To required for the exploration and settlement of other worlds, to make school work less forbidding by dramatizing that it is the key to the universe beyond, to attract students to the disciplines that are prerequisite to tackling the challenge of the starsthese are the objectives of the Young Astronaut Program. Students will be regularly scheduled to go to the computer lab, math lab, and the science lab which will be -15- staffed by certified specialists. Instructional assistants will assist the math and science specialists and regular classroom teachers with coordination and implementation of the specialized instructional program. The principal of the school will be the primary administrator of the program with an assistant principal to help with administrative duties. Specific skills and concepts from various subject areas will be emphasized at each grade level. To be eligible for academic promotion at Washington, the student must: -master these targeted skills and concepts with 85 percent accuracy\n-perform daily academic activities with 85 percent accuracy\n-spend a minimum time each night on assigned homework: 30 minutes for students in grades one and two, 45 minutes for students in grade three, and one hour for students in grades four, five and six\nand -complete all assignments according to specified time frames. Specific rules and regulations regarding academic performance and social behavior will be strictly but fairly enforced. A major component of the philosophy of the Washington Basic Skills/Math-Science School will be that the education of a child is the responsibility of both the school and the parents. Enrollment at Washington will be open to students from Pulaski County and North Little Rock based on M-M provisions and on the provisions of Act 609 of 1989 (\"School Choice\" law). Dunbar International Studies/Talented and Gifted (7-9) : Dunbar Junior High School will open in the fall of 1990 as an Interdistrict Specialty School for International Studies and for Talented and Gifted Education. First preference will be given to current students at Dunbar and to sixth graders at Gibbs International Studies Magnet School. An active recruitment effort will be planned for the spring of 1990 to recruit the incoming seventh grade class. The balance of the seventh grade class will be recruited from the Dunbar attendance zone and from the Pulaski County Special School District and the North Little Rock School District. Majority-to-Minority transfers will be the vehicle by which interdistrict students may come to Dunbar. If recruiting from Gibbs, the attendance zone, and interdistrict transfers fails to fill the school to capacity, other students from junior high schools will be recruited through the vehicle of desegregation transfers. New students who live in the attendance zone or students who are enrolled at Dunbar during the 1989-90 school year will not be required to attend Dunbar if they have no interest in the speciality program. If over -16-capacity problems develop among LRSD junior high schools, they shall be resolved by mandatory interdistrict assignments. Students who~wish to partTcipate in the talented/gifted component at Dunbar will enter the school through the same recruitment vehicles outlined above. Talented/gifted students need only to have been identified and recommended for placement in order to qualify for talented/gifted classes at Dunbar. Z At Dunbar,, Spanish, French, Russian, Japanese, German, and Latin will be offered. Other courses will be developed in interdisciplinary approaches. Introduction to Languages, Studies Survey, World Issues, the United Nations, and Introduction to Cultures are among the courses to be provided. new Additionally, other courses, c.~ social studies, science, physical education, and English^ will be internationalized through emphasis on the e.g. commonalities of the human experience, the contribution of diverse ethnic groups, and the interrelated nature of the world community. Current affairs of an international nature will be continually used, including print media and programming from AETN, The Discovery Channel, and Cable News Network. A comprehensive competitive sports program will be provided with soccer as the dominant sport. A seven-period day will be provided at Dunbar in order to allow studi studies art s totake full benefit of the international 'T^GjrograniS'. Also students could take ' advantage of the A.M. and P.M. Options. The P.M. Option'/ would be a supervised study hall held in the media center, thus allowing students to- use l-i-b-r-a-ryy aan^dd computer The A.M. Option could be a (Supervised study halA or a regular class. resources. Course requirements and electives for the Dunbar program are described in the Curriculum Overview below. -A y a 7 7 CURRICULUM OVERVIEW OF DUNBAR INTERDISTRICT SPECIALTY SCHOOL FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES AND GIFTED AND TALENTED EDUCATION All students at Dunbar will be required to participate in the international studies curriculum. The following courses are available to satisfy the international studies requirement. seven. Foreign Language - Full-year foreign language study will be available beginning in grade seven. The following courses will be available: French I, ll, ill German I, II, m Japanese I, II, ill Latin I, II, iii Russian I, II, ill Spanish I, II, ill -17- In foreign language study students will learn the vocabulary and grammar of the language and the history and culture of the people who use it. Students who do not choose to study a specific foreign language may choose to enroll in Introduction to Language. This full-year course is available to students in grade seven, eight, or nine, and introduces students to the culture and conversational rudiments of six different languages: Japanese, Latin, Russian, and Spanish. French, German, The course will give students an understanding of the nature of foreign language study and will help students choose a language they may wish to pursue in later grades. International Studies - Beginning with grade eight, the international studies reguirement may be met with the International Studies Curriculum rather than with a foreign language, if one chooses. Available in grades eight and nine. International Studies choices will consist of a series of courses on varying topics. , The International Studies Choices Curriculum will consist of the following courses: Grades 7 and 8 Physical Geography This course will include extensive computer-enhanced instruction and topics such as cartography, natural phenomena, and ecology presented as global concerns. World Issues This course will involve a thematic approach to continuing and current global issues. It will utilize current media information sources including Cable News Network's Discovery. II II and presentations. Newsroom\" and the Discovery Channel's \"Assignment The course will include individualized projects Arkansas's World Connections This course will investigate the state's ties with the international community emphasizing economic, developmental, and financial connections. -18-Grade 9 United Nations This course will include the history, structure, and functions of the United Nations emphasizing current issues before its organization. Leaders of the Twentieth Century This course investigates the lives and impact of 20th century leaders including Gandhi, Mao, Hitler, Churchill, and Roosevelt as well as contemporary societal and political leaders. Students will project characteristics of leaders needed for the 21st century. International Skills community. This course includes practical skills designed to help students become responsible participants in the adult Components include driver's education culminating in an Arkansas driver's license and an international driver's license, a safety program including emergency procedures and CPR resulting in International Red Cross certification, and instruction in procedures and protocol for foreign travel. Students who express interest in this course would be selected on the basis of the number of semesters at Dunbar, attendance record at Dunbar, and citizenship grades. International Sports This course includes team and individual sports popular in other societies such as soccer, taekwando, and tennis. The programs of studies for each of the three grades are outlined below to illustrate the required courses and the electives available for students at Dunbar. -19-7th Grade Program of Studies 7 Period Day Required Courses 1. 2. 3, 4 . 5. 6. English , Mathematics World Geography Life Science (Exploratory Studies - 1 semester) Music/Art (Practical Arts - 1 semester) Home Economics or Industrial Arts Introduction to Languages or Foreign Language I {French I, German I, Japanese I, 7. Latin I, Russian I, Spanish I) Special Programs (Required for students needing assistance in reading, math, or English) PAL English, PAL Math, PAL Combination, or Learning Lab Students not required to enroll in special programs may select an elective from the following: Elective Courses Physical Geography World Issues Arkansas's World Connections Art Choral Music Physical Education Band Orchestra -20- Sth Grade Program of Studies 7 Period day Required courses 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. English Mathematics American History Earth Science Health/PE (9 weeks each) Career Orientation (1 semester) Introduction to Languages or Foreign Language I or II (French I, II\nGerman I, li\nJapanese I, II\nLatin I, II\nRussian I, II\nSpanish I, II) or International Choices Curriculum (Physical Geography, World Issues, Arkansas's World Connections) Special Programs (Required for students needing assistance in reading, math, or English) PAL English, PAL Math, PAL Combination, or Learning Lab Students not required to enroll in Special Programs may select an elective from the following: Elective Courses Physical Geography World Issues Arkansas's World Connections Art Choral Music Band Orchestra Physical Education -21- 9th Grade Program of Studies 7 Period Day Required Courses 1. 2 . 3 . 4 . 5. 6. English Mathematics Civics Physical Science Computer Science (1 year) or Computer Literacy (1 semester) and Any Semester Elective (1 semester) Introduction to Languages or Foreign Language I, II, III {French I, II, III\nGerman I, II, III\nJapanese I, II, III\nLatin I, II, III\nRussian I, II, III\nSpanish I, II, III) or International Choices Curriculum (United Nations - 1 semester. Leaders of the Twentieth Century - 1 semester, International Skills 1 semester, 7. International Sports - 1 semester) Special Programs (Required for students needing assistance in reading, math, or English) PAL English, PAL Math, PAL Combination, or Learning Lab. Students not required to enroll in Special Programs may select an elective from the following: Elective Courses United Nations (1 semester) Leaders of the Twentieth Century (1 semester) International Skills (1 semester) International Sports (1 semester) Exploratory Business Physical Education (1 year) Health (1 semester) Home Economics Industrial Technology II Art Choral Music Band Orchestra -22- . 1 University Laboratory School (Pre-K-9): Interest has been expressed in a university laboratory school which would demonstrate state of the art techniques in teaching and school leadership. ' ' ' \"  It would be located on or near the campus of the University of Arkansas at Little Rock. Students from Pulaski County and North Little Rock would be invited to enroll according to M-M regulati Act 609. and Bale Elementary and Southwest Junior High may/be considered as a site for the University Lab School. The Little Rock School District proposes to open such school in the 1991-92 school year. *  The remainder of this a year and the 1990-91 school year would be planning years in which District and University staff would plan the curriculum and theme for the school. Little Rock Central High School (10-12): Approximately 200 spaces are presently unfilled at Little Rock Central High School. These seats will be opened to students from North Little Rock, Pulaski County, and other neighboring districts at the beginning of the 1990-91 school year. The flagship program of choice at Central will be its extensive foreign language program. ___ _ - . - , Other specialty areas around an international studies theme will be planned and developed according to a five-year schedule by Central High staff members and administrators and curriculum specialists from the three school districts in Pulaski County. -23-Intradistrict Magnets While the LRSD will continue to invite students from neighboring districts to enroll in intradistrict magnets, ' the pur^se of these schools will be primarily to attract students who reside in Little Rock. U 7 Four intradistrict magnets are proposed with ratios of 60 percent black and 40 percent white. Aviation and Transportation/Math-Science Magnet (7-9) : ?-/2 The Aviation and Transportation/Math-Science Magnet will be constructed at or near the airport in cooperation with the planned Arkansas Aviation Museum and will open in 1991-92. In 1992-93 grade 9 will be added. Also during the 1991-92 school year, students will be surveyed to determine their interest in pursuing a high school program as part of the aviation and transporation magnet.  ' If sufficient interest is shown, a specialized high school program will be implemented. In the Aviation and Transportation Magnet Junior High School a competitive comprehensive activities program will probably not be provided since high school enrollment in the Aviation and Transportation Magnet will be small and the program highly specialized. It will integrate science, mathematics, technology, engineering, and social studies around an aviation and transportation theme. The study of aviation and transportation will cross many disciplines, including history, geography, communications, physics, engineering, design, mechanics, computers, and navigation. Various human-oriented services will also be included. The instructional program at this magnet school will make students aware of the available careers in the major industrial fields of aviation, shipping, and transportation. 7 Courses at the Aviation and Transportation/Math-Science Magnet will include such titles as: Avionics Communications Navigation History of Transportation Geographic, Social, Economic, and Cultural Developments Due to Transportation Physics of Flight Modern Transportation Transportation Engineering Human Services Aspects of Transportation Field experiences will be provided with the following local transportation authorities: Adams Field Falcon Jet Arkansas Highway Department Little Rock Port Authority McClellan-Kerr Navigation System -24-Union Pacific Railroad Local trucking companies Local aviation companies The core disciplines for the Aviation and Transportation Magnet School will be science and mathematics. Each student will take science lab minicourses that focus on the scientific method and explore a variety of topics in science. Students will be expected to display their mastery of the scientific method by completion of a project that shows application of scientific processes and principles of mathematics. will have available courses in algebra I, algebra II, and geometry. Thematic courses in the area of aviation and transportation will utilize science and mathematics skills. The Vocational Education modules, \"Exploring Industrial Technology Education,\" will form the basis for one or more thematic magnet courses. several ways to meet program needs. The modules can be combined in Flight simulators, hydraulics, construction technology, electronics, and other modules will support the program quite well. State vocational funding can be obtained for these courses. In addition, a social science course and a physics/engineering course will complete the curriculum. CCooccuurrrriiccuullaarr activities will include field trips to Adams Field, Murray Lock and Dam, and other appropriate sites. Professionals from the transportation industry will be invited to participate as guest lecturers at the school site. The school will have a seven-period day to create time for the addition of specialty courses. A small number of specialists will be hired and trained/retrained in the specialty subject they will teach. These employees will need to take course work or attend staff development sessions during the summer of 1990. Students will meet District and State program requirements and will take a small number of required courses in the specialty area. Other specialty courses will be electives. Environmental Sciences and Basic Skills Magnet (Pre-K-6): Much interest has been expressed in the concept of an environmental sciences magnet (popularly referred to as the \"Zoo\" magnet). If property can be purchased or used near the Little Rock Zoo, an environmental sciences magnet for students in grades pre K-6 will be built, to be opened in 7 1991-92. If property cannot be purchased,. FFrraannkklliinn ,7 Elementary School will become the environmental science magnet. To expand the environmental sciences theme into the junior high school, the science curriculum will be reviewed and new courses proposed for Forest Heights Junior High School students who may be interested in pursuing studies in environmental sciences. ~  -- - - 1992-93 school year. Such courses will be added by the -25- is The theme of the school, environmental education, ideal for developing a magnet program that will not only be a powerful drawing card for students but will also focus on a current topic that involves science and technology, addresses ethical concerns, has a sense of global urgency, and requires interdisciplinary approaches to solving problems. A recent national report funded by the National Science Foundation stated about K-6 science, \"An integrated, hands-on approach is needed, which focuses on the relationship between humans and the total environment.\" This and other reports focus on the need to integrate science and technology with societal issues. Learning should start with things that students are familiar with, such as their environment, and proceed to use that experience base to introduce other, more abstract, concepts. The Environmental Sciences and/Basic Skillsl ict Magnet Elementary School will address needs currently being communicated at the national level. At the same time, the school can combine available community resources with an inherently interesting topic to create program that attracts a diversity of students. a -A A. The Environmental Sciences and Basic Skills Magnet Elementary School has the following goals: Students will learn in a multicultural setting that includes representation from all three Pulaski County school districts and neighboring districts. B. Community environmental resources (such as the Zoo, Museum, Game and Fish Department, etc.) will enhance educational experiences for children. C. Environmental education will be an interdisciplinary theme around which much of the instructional program will be delivered. Student learning outcomes for the instructional D. jyuuciiL xeariirng ror me program will include major environmental education concepts from all three learning domains: 1. Knowledge of basic environmental concepts and facts Understanding the relationship between humans and the natural world E. 3. 4 . 5. Acquire a II caretaker\" attitude toward earth Understand and appreciate all forms of life Apply nurturing skills to care for plants and animals The School Plant will include facilities needed for environmental studies such as a greenhouse and science laboratory. Staff specialists will be employed to operate the greenhouse/science laboratory. Staff specialists and regular classroom teachers will work to develop an interdisciplinary curriculum with environmental education as the organizing theme. and State content guides and objectives will be used to make District -26- 2.National sure that all skills are included in the program. National curricula such as Project WILD, Project Learning Tree, Project Zoo, and other programs that might become available will be utilized. students and In addition to normal classroom activities, st will spend time weekly in the science laboratory and greenhouse conducting experiments, culturing plants, caring for animals. Frequent excursions to the Zoo will _students an additional living laboratory to study. Curricular activities will include such things as wildlife clubs, garden clubs, and Zoo docent training. A contract with the Zoo and other community resources will be developed to detail the working relationship between the parties. Montessori Magnet (Pre-K-6): s Garland Elementary School, one of the District' current incentive schools, will eventually become a Montessori Magnet School. The plan is to provide a program for youngsters ages 3-6 by the 1992-93 school year and to i T L it for youngsters ages 7-12 in 1993-94 I Yyy'rwr __________  1 as an -------\n--------------------- -- -----L. This will provide Garland with two years in which to function as an incentive school and to begin to recruit white families to the school for the Montessori program. Roinin\u0026lt; Gifted-Talented/Cooperative Learning School (Pre-K-6) \" The goals of Romine School will be: to develop the highest possible competence in academic skills and concepts to develop task commitment and self motivation to foster self-discipline and to discuss/foster special interests, talents, and abilities of students and provide opportunities to develop areas of interest to nurture the students' mental processes to foster student participation, effective cooperative learning, and the development of strong interpersonal skills to enable students to learn to work together in a world in which they will live together Romine Gifted-Talented/Cooperative Learning School's curriculum will increase effective participation in lifelong learning. The wider the range of intellectual stimulation to which students are exposed, the greater the chances are that all of the diverse potentialitiesboth within a group of students and within a single studentwill be brought to fruition. The gifted/talented component will provide a very broad and challenging curriculum for the diverse student body. This school will utilize the cooperative theme in teaching basic skills as well as enr^hed courses -27-Incentive School Plan The purpose of the Incentive School program is to promote and ensure academic excellence in schools that have been difficult to desegregate. It is believed that the Incentive School Program will not only compensate the victims of segregation but will also serve as a tool for promoting meaningful and long-lasting desegregation in these schools and in the entire District. In order to be successful, the Incentive Program must address the academic, social, and emotional needs of all student participants. The Incentive Program must also serve as a recruitment tool for meeting the desegregation requirements in these schools. With the proper resources and expectations, the Incentive School Program will serve as a model of excellence for the county, state, and nation. The success of the Incentive School Program is directly related to the success of the long-term desegregation plan in the Little Rock School District. Opportunities for academic achievement are enhanced by commitment, high expectations, a strong belief that all children can learn, and broad-based community support. When these ideals are coupled with the availability of financial resources, educational excellence prevails. It is certainly the belief of the District that all of these ideals will be evident in each incentive school. In the incentive schools all children, to the extent possible, will be a part of the mainstreamed instructional program. Content will be delivered in a manner that enhances positive self-concept for all students, but especially for those students who have been identified special-needs students. as Also, all students will have equitable access to educational materials, resources,and appropriate instructional delivery. Further, in the incentive schools, the overall school enrollment, all classes, all programs, all activities, and all teaching and supervisory staff (to the maximum extent possible) will be racially balanced and numerically racially representative. 7 Students will be encouraged to pursue post secondary schooling. Era-c-h Little Rock School.. .D.i.s.t.r.i.c.t.. (.L.R.S.D) student enrolled in the Incentive School Program will be eligible for post secondary scholarships. A plan which will make post-secondary educational experiences feasible will be implemented commencing with the 1990-91 school year. -28- The following schools will provide the Incentive Schools Program: - Garland - Ish - Mitchell - Rightsell - Rockefeller - Stephens Program Goals: 1. 2. 3. 4 . 5. 6. 7. 8. To provide the most rigorous, demanding, and challenging curricular and instructional opportunities within the Little Rock School District (LRSD). To focus on the mastery of a core curriculum of worthwhile knowledge, important skills, and sound ideas. To promote the concept that school desegregation/ integration and quality education are inseparable. To promote the concept of learning, personal and human growth and development, positive self-esteem, and concern for other people and property. To promote improved human and civil rights for all people through the development of human relations skills within the schools. To incorporate in the incentive school core curriculum a systematic approach for exploring the history, culture, and diversity of all ethnic groups of the school population. To promote language development and computation skills through varying experiences. To deliver curricular content in a manner that minimizes the need to label students as special learners. To create and maintain a learning environment which is substantially free from overt manifestation of socioeconomic disparity among students. To provide an opportunity for the schools to become learning and community centers for parents and 11. community organizations. To facilitate strategies for students to establish personal goals for achievement and success. -29- Curriculum Areas: Emphasis/Expansion in Curriculum Areas: Though the K-6 core curriculum currently in use in the Little Rock School District will remain the basis for the incentive school curriculum, significant emphasis, modification of existing instructional techniques, and the introduction of new educational delivery systems will be required. In addition changes or modifications in the core curriculum will be indicated. In recent years in the Little Rock School District, students in kindergarten through grade 3 have not been exposed to any kind of comprehensive or detailed science curriculum. Some children who will be serviced in the incentive schools have had no concentrated science instruction. The design of an expanded science curriculum will approach the teaching of elementary science from two different perspectives: (1) the inclusion of comprehensive science instruction at all levels, and (2) the utilization of innovative instructional techniques which are not in common use in most of the District's elementary schools. The curriculum for physical education will be directed toward achieving individual competencies in health-related fitness, skill-related fitness, fundamental movements and body management, psychosocial foundations (attitudes associated with well-being), and visual/motor manipulatives. Instructional Delivery: area The instructional approach to teaching each subject in the incentive schools will place a greater emphasis on active student involvement in the instructional process. This will be accomplished by the utilization of the following instructional strategies: 1. Student Team Learning - Utilization of the Slavin model, which places strong emphasis on cooperative learning and individual achievement through group interaction, will be used to facilitate this approach. Specifically, the District will use a model developed by Robert Slavin and associates at the Johns Hopkins University titled \"Student Team Learning\" to help teachers implement successful group work within the II classroom setting. The success of Student Team Learning for achieving increases in student achievement has been carefully researched by Slavin and others the past 10 years and offers documentation for its success with high and low achievers of all ethnic over groups. LRSD has several trainers (administrative and teacher) already prepared to conduct staff development for teachers in the incentive schools on the Slavin model of Student Team Learning. -30- 2. Whole-group Instruction - Experiences will be developed to meet program objectives through whole-group instruction. Opportunities will be provided for 3. students to interact in skills related activities. Higher Order Thinking Skills - Higher Order Thinking Skills can be utilized at almost any level of instruction. Teachers in the incentive schools will be trained in developing lessons and questioning techniques that solicit objective student responses and encourage imaginative problem solving. Teachers will 4. use this process as an integral part of their instructional approach to teaching the core curriculum. One-to-One Instruction Since research has 5. conclusively shown that direct one-to-one instruction is the most effective learning model, the adult-to-student tutoring approach utilizing direct instruction will be employed whenever possible. Learning Styles Inventory - All incentive school students will undergo a learning styles inventory to assist teachers in diversifying their teaching styles to match the learning styles of the students. Any 6. 7. teacher who has not undergone a reliable learning styles inventory over the past three years will also participate in an identified learning styles inventory. Student Education Plans  The incentive schools will make use of Student Education Plans for all students. Homework - All homework in the incentive schools will be used to reinforce instruction, to aid retention, and to assist students in transferring and relating concepts to the learning process. given in isolation. Homework will not be I 0^? Content Area Modifications: SCIENCE Extended Opportunities - Field trips will be used to enhance learning, to broaden cultural experiences, to provide hands-on experiences for knowledge of the world, and to assist in the development of coping skills for students as well as encouraging a better understanding of science and its related components. Field trips will be designed so that children in the incentive schools are not deprived of field experience opportunities because of socioeconomic status.In addition, field trips will involve teachers in preparation and transfer activities for the extended learning opportunities both before and after the trip. All field trips must be related to and/or interwoven into class instruction and follow-up. Additional Resources - Other approaches for enhanced learning opportunities in the science curriculum will involve the use of realistic and modern visuals, one-to-one instruction (may be peer to peer, retired personnel to -31- student, aide or student teacher to student, teacher to student, specialist to student), intermittent student conferences, varied instructional approaches to the effective deliverance of higher order thinking skills, and the use of peers and retired personnel as tutors for students in incentive schools. Curriculum Changes - The present LRSD science curriculum will be used along with the complementary objectives in the March 23, 1989, Little Rock School District Proposed Desegregation Plan, Volume II, which include the following: - Instruction will utilize a hands-on discovery and exploration approach to the learning of scientific concepts (K-3). - Classroom and textbook work will be supplemented with practical demonstration and experiments that reinforce the principles of scientific method and suggest the applications and possibilities of the sciences.  Emphasis in the upper grades will be on life sciences and physical sciences (4-6). - Mastery of concepts should culminate with an annual project\ni.e.. Invention Convention, Science Fair, etc. - Homework assignments will include prepared information packets describing experiments parents and students can do together to reinforce what has been taught in the classroom. The curriculum discussed above, aligned with the additional components listed below, will encourage student success through the Incentive School Program. 1) 2) 3) Instructional Technology - All incentive schools should have available the most modern instructional technology for use in specialized laboratories and/or in individual classrooms. The computer laboratory in each incentive school will also be used for science.., t Study and Test Taking Skills - The incentive schools will integrate the teaching of the study skills, taking skills, and reinforcement of scientific test vocabulary with the teaching of science in both the laboratory setting and the regular science instructional time block. Students will be provided with opportunities to practice test taking skills using content and formats similar to standardized tests for their age/grade level. SOCIAL STUDIES Though the current core curriculum should remain in place, a number of important modifications are necessary to the success of the social studies program. -32-1) 2) Realistic Visuals - The use of professional, updated models, materials, bulletin boards, textbooks, etc., are critical to giving children a sense of place in an ever-changing world. 3) /'Cultural Diversity - The Little Rock School District' current instructional material does not accurately I reflect the cultural or racial diversity evident in the student population of the incentive schools. It is critical to make every effort, including the use of supplemental materials in addition to regular textbooks, to ensure that the incentive school social studies program corresponds with the goals and objectives of the Incentive School Program relative to ethnicity. s 4) Values Clarification and Related Approaches - The proactive techniques once utilized by the Little Rock School District, including but not limited to I'm OK, You're OK (transactional analysis), Values Clarification, Project Aware, and the Green Circle Program, should play a vital role in actively involving students in instruction that allows them to grapple with ideas, concepts, and values critical to an understanding of how society works. Verbal Skills - The utilization of activities designed to encourage oral expression has not received enough emphasis at the elementary level. it is critical that students be taught the skills that will allow them to clearly articulate their thoughts and provide them the self-confidence so critical to a positive self-image. The following activities will place a renewed emphasis on this all important skill: a) b) c) Debate - By reintroducing this standard of the traditional curriculum, the incentive schools can increase the speaking and writing skills of students while building their confidence. Even more important, students can learn effective ways to deal with disagreements and can be taught conflict resolution and cause and effect on a practical and academic level. Show-N-Tell - This important aspect of the traditional curriculum will be utilized on a regular and systematic basis to facilitate self-concept, verbal skills, and selfconfidence . Current Events - A greater emphasis should be placed on the integration of current events into the curriculum for all grade levels at the incentive schools. This is imperative if students are to become active citizens in 5) their community and the world around them. Field Experiences - A creative and more systematic utilization of field trips of greater length and -33-6) variety will be one of the unique aspects of the social studies program at incentive schools. Though traditional sites such as the zoo and museums will certainly be visited, the focus should be expanded to include government agencies, factories, colleges, historical sites, places of business, etc. Every effort will be made to organize the trip in conjunction with the current program of studies. study Skills Laboratory - Critical o success in any subject, particularly social studies, is the establishment of a skills laboratory which places emphasis on the \"how-to's\" of research, test taking, and book analysis. This area has been long neglected to the detriment of student performance on MAT-6 and the Minimum Performance Test. A comprehensive approach to these and other basic skills is required. MATHEMATICS Though the current core curriculum should remain in place, a number of important modifications are necessary for the success of the mathematics program. r 1) Mathematics Laboratory - The study of mathematics in laboratory setting will be an integral part of the curriculum for the incentive schools. Laboratory instruction will place emphasis on concreteness 2) 3) (kinesthetic and tactile activities), manipulatives (hands-on activities), problem solving, realistic pictures, materials, and resources. By providing students with opportunities for hands-on experiences and positive attitudes, laboratory opportunities will contribute to an improved academic self-concept. Instructional Technology - Instructional technology will be incorporated in the mathematics program for all grade levels to develop skills in problem solving, reasoning, and communication. Various technological equipment/materials will include up-to-date computers, calculators, video cassette recorders, supplemental textbooks, films, manipulatives, and realistic visuals. Parent/Child Learning Kits - Essential skills in mathematics should be reviewed and strengthened at each grade level to individualize the learning process for grade levi ren. -4) _ Prepared parent/child learning kits will be provided to foster home involvement of parents with These kits will include basic mathematics child. information, manipulatives, and problem solving. Problem Solving - Problem solving activities will be integral part of the mathematics program. Emphasis will be placed on building confidence, developing strategies for understanding, and fostering logical Mathematics manipulatives used will include thinking. an Emphasis Versa-Tiles, cuisenaire rods, attribute blocks, base 10 a -34-blocks, geoboards, tangrams, pattern tiles, unifix cubes and pattern blocks. PHYSICAL EDUCATION/HEALTH The physical education program will provide for the needs of all students in achieving individual competencies in motor skills, knowledge, and attitudes. 1) Curriculum Guide - Educational skills related to the physical education program will be outlined in a course content guide, K-6. Systematic utilization of the 2) guide will be emphasized in the incentive schools. Intramural Program - Intramural programs will be established at each of the incentive schools. The 3) 4) fundamental purpose of the program will be to develop enjoyment of team sports and lifelong leisure skills. This program will provide competitive physical education games and activities in addition to class activities. Specialized Equipment - Specialized equipment will be needed to implement the essential physical education skills. The equipment will include items such as trampolines, balance beams, balls, hoops, ropes, and other psychomotor materials. Health Related Fitness - Fundamental and developmental skills in health related fitness will be an integral component of the physical education program. Opportunities and experiences will be provided to include family life education, human development, fitness exercises, and understanding of and respect for the handicapped. FINE ARTS (MUSIC/ART) The current core curriculum will remain in place with a number of important modifications which are necessary for the success of the fine arts program. 1) 2) Realistic Visuals - The use of professional activities, models, materials, bulletin boards, and textbooks should reflect mankind's heritage in music and art. Cultural Diversity - Emphasis will be placed on cultural diversity in basic, developmental, and extension skills in music and art. Each fine arts 3) experience should provide conditions for students to recognize, understand, and appreciate differences in people, traditional beliefs, and uniqueness of cultural styles. Field Type Experience - More systematic utilization of field trips of greater length and variety will be one of the unique aspects of the fine arts program. Students will be provided opportunities for active participation in group and individual performances. -35-4) Exhibits and field type experiences will be used to reinforce the learning of concepts in music and art. The focus of field experiences should be expanded to include museums, art galleries, commercial advertisement offices, concerts, plays, recitals, and ballets. Creative Expression - Enjoyment of music and art should be emphasized in the earlier grades (K-3) through the creation of music, painting, and crafts. Creative expression should be expanded at the intermediate level to include an understanding of cultural and historical differences. Opportunities should be provided for 5) students to share, display, and demonstrate their abilities through performances, plays, exhibits, programs, and fairs. Clubs/Events - Special interest clubs in music and art should provide opportunities for students to enhance learning, to broaden cultural experiences, and to receive special training in addition to the regular class. Students should be encouraged to participate in vocal and instrumental ensembles and appropriate art 6) exhibits. Fine Arts Resource Center An area should be designated within each incentive school for storing materials, activities, and equipment for music and art. These resources related to fine arts skills and concepts development should be available for students to use at home, following\nThese resources should include the a) b) Music - musical instruments, records, tapes, books, sheet music, videos, and pictures. Art - drawing paper, construction paper, crayons, markers, paint brushes, modeling clay, pictures, books, paints, lettering sets, and various craft items. READING The developmental approach to teaching reading will be applied in the incentive schools. Neither age nor class designation will be a factor in determining the cognitive developmental needs of a child at any given time. This approach will require frequent and on-going formative assessment to determine the child's immediate instructional needs. More time on task to include teaching and reteaching, utilizing alternative instructional techniques. will characterize the reading program. Teaching of reading will not be confined to the reading block of time, but will be meaningfully incorporated in all areas of the curriculum. The \"whole-group\" instructional approach will be applied in the reading program, reinforced by reteaching, identified small group instruction, and individual tutoring. This approach will be facilitated by limiting the teacher- -36- pupil ratio to 20:1 in the primary grades (K-3) and 25:1 in the intermediate grades (4-6). An instructional aide will be provided for each forty (40) students, constituting a .50 aide per classroom. To utilize teacher strengths/skills and maximally meet the individual student needs, team teaching at grade levels will be employed in the incentive schools. Peer tutoring, involving students from grades 5 and 6 as well as students from nearby secondary high schools, will serve to further extend learning time for primary children (K-3). Field trips designed to extend classroom objectives and to broaden student experiences will be incorporated as a major component of the reading program. To maximize the field trip experience, the teacher will develop and teach pre and post field trip lessons. Instructional technology, to include the use of the computer, will be employed as a teaching tool, focusing on teacher interaction with students, and providing immediate feedback and reinforcement to the student. This procedure utilizes the computer as a visual vehicle for instruction and is not intended to replace laboratory computer instruction. Homework will provide opportunities for further mastery of skills/concepts taught in the classroom. Students will be permitted to take the basal reader and other library resources home for specifically designed homework assignments. Under no circumstances will homework be required of a child who has not demonstrated mastery of the homework content at the comprehension level. To facilitate the use of background experiences in the development of vocabulary and comprehension, story mapping will be a common practice. Critical thinking skills will be taught at all grade levels, including among others, drawing conclusions, predicting, inferences, analysis, and evalua-tion. Social development as well as cognitive reading skills will be enhanced by the inclusion of multicultural literature, audio-visual materials, and resource persons from various cultural groups. Focus on oral language development will be a high priority in the incentive school. Opportunities to develop oral fluency will include speaking, storytelling, chanting, imitating, debating, dramatics, and choral reading and reciting. LANGUAGE ARTS The Little Rock School District believes that all students can become proficient users of language by learning strategies of reading, writing, speaking, and listening. The language arts programs of the District reflect these goals in a multicultural curriculum designed to nurture and -37- expand the developing literacy, speaking, and writing abilities of all students. The following guides will be used for the language arts program in the incentive schools: - Curriculum Objectives (K-6) and Core Curriculum Charts - Multicultural Materials (Selection and Use) - Core Literature List (K-6) - Multicultural Vocabulary (Teacher and Student Lists) - Curriculum Materials/Activities/Resources Effective oral and written communication skills are fundamental to an individual's success in academic activities, social development, professional performance. and personal fulfillment. The incentive schools will develop and infuse multicultural education in all grade levels of English language arts. are to enable each student to develop: The goals of this program - Clarity, fluency, and precision in standard oral and written communication\n- The ability to give structure to thoughts\n- The ability to analyze and discuss\n- A consciousness of linguistic patterns and structure\n- A pride in, appreciation for, and sensitivity for standard language and an awareness of nonstandard language\nand - Creative thought and expression. The core curriculum, concept, skills, and behavioral objectives have been clearly defined in the Little Rock School District curriculum guides, which form the foundation for the language arts programs in the incentive schools. context. English usage will be taught in spoken and written The teaching of English usage will be made relevant and meaningful to the student by utilizing the student's spoken and written language as an instructional vehicle to clarify new concepts/skills. Oral language will be facilitated by providing varied opportunities for the child to practice speaking in meaningful settings such as dramatic play, giving directions, making plans for activities, talking about experiences in school, community, etc., making announcements, debating, orations, telling riddles, dramatizing stories, traveling experiences, telephone conversations, making introductions, conducting club meetings, etc. ^uency will be acquired through practice. The concept of writing to read will be incorporated in the language arts program. Written language is concerned with the child's efforts to express his/her ideas in -38- writing. Ideas are in abstract form until they \"flow through a pencil or pen\" to the paper. the incentiv_e_-Schools, the child will be provided many techniques and skills necessary for fluency. C__ '__L.,1 To create this flow, ques to be utilized are: Some techni- Journal writing - Poetry - Reports - Letters - business and friendly - Plays - Riddles - Biographies - Stories - Newspaper articles - Books Language arts, speaking, reading, writing, and spelling are all interdependent disciplines and will be taught as such. It is essential that the child understands the relationship of these disciplines. The student's valuing of each discipline will be enhanced as he/she becomes aware of the relationship between writing and spelling, speaking and reading, and reading and writing. The functional importance of nonverbal communication cannot be minimized. Consequently, this area of communication will be a part of the language arts curriculum in the incentive schools. Recent research identifies nonverbal communication as a valuable means of communication. The development of telecommunication technology and the elimination of communication barriers have created a need for greater understanding of all forms of communication. COMPUTER LITERACY The Little Rock School District does not have a comprehensive computer literacy program in operation at the present time for elementary school children. The elementary schools in Little Rock are equipped with computer laboratories which are used for remediation and enrichment. The incentive schools will continue to use the computer laboratories with their present design and scope. In addition, the Little Rock School District incentive schools will offer computer-supported, individual, and group-based instruction for elementary school reading, mathematics. social studies, science, art, etc. Participation, instruction, practice, feedback, and monitoring will be the keys to unraveling the computer for elementary students in the incentive schools according to the following objectives: -39-1) 2) The computer will be used to enhance student participation, feedback, and performance as well as monitoring in classroom and laboratory settings. The computer program experience for students in the incentive schools will involve the students from an orientation stage to a mastery stage. (Inextricably 3) 4) interwoven in the mastery will be the advent of elementary instruction in keyboarding and/or typing). The computer will involve students in active instructional tasks, active learning, and opportunities for providing and receiving explanations. The computer literacy program will help to encourage teachers in actively involving students in an ongoing program that: a) b) c) d) e) f) begins in kindergarten, follows a scope and sequence similar to other subjects, pursues grade level mastery annually, masters the keyboarding skills needed for efficiency, utilizes intermediate level programming skills necessary for proficiency, and produces a computer literate student by 6th grade who: 1) 2) recognizes and appreciates the ability of a computer and understands and is able to demonstrate command of the computer before entering the 7th grade. Keyboarding will be offered from 4th grade through 6th grade, utilizing the following format: Beginning in the 4th grade, the incentive program will offer an entire nine weeks/grading period for students to learn practical standard keyboarding practices while still allowing them access to computers in other settings during the first grading period. The remaining three grading periods will offer support and reinforcement for the keyboarding as well as an introduction to basic programming. For students who may have advanced skills, advanced programming will be offered. In order to qualify for advanced instruction, students must have demonstrated mastery of basic programming before being placed in an advanced programming class. In instances where the computer will be used to provide students with higher levels of participation, feedback, and performance monitoring, instructional software directed toward immediate ability for student response will be used. (Example: The software used should allow for immediate reliable feedback from the teacher and the software. -40-The use of the computer will allow the teacher more time for direct instruction because: 1) 2) 3) The teacher will not be free or released during computer instruction. The teacher will be involved with the students during training, practice, and follow-up. The regular classroom teacher may or may not be the computer teacher (May vary depending on teacher skills, willingness to acquire skills, specialists available, etc.) Personnel directly involved in computer instruction will require prior training or extensive training in the operation and care of the computer. The computer-teacher programmer will be a professional who has also been trained to teach. The computer teacher and/or computer-teacher programmer will require training on specific software packages to be used at the different grade levels. These individuals will also be trained in discipline and classroom management, in group process, and in Student Team Learning. Support Programs: The focus, function, and guiding process of the incentive schools will be to provide excellence in an environment of academic support. Research indicates that parent and community involvement are critical to academic achievement. In particular, support programs are capable of enhancing both compensatory and enrichment activities, addition to the various support strategies used by the In Little Rock School District, the following support programs will be available in each incentive school: HOMEWORK CENTERS - Each incentive school will offer an after school homework center for students who are in need of specific help with class material. one teacher and aide will operate the center. At least The teacher will also be responsible for conferring with regular classroom teachers concerning individual student needs. PEER TUTORING - Peer tutoring will be selected from among a group of self-nominated and teacher-nominated students. The role of peer tutors will not be limited only to those students with outstanding academic grade point averages but will also be open to other students who have mastered the subject matter and can verbalize an understanding of the subject matter to be covered. RETIRED TEACHER PROGRAM - Retired teachers will be recruited to come into the incentive schools and work with individual students as tutors. Retired teachers will be involved in different types of .41. a. individual and small group activities that address the academic, social, and developmental needs of the students. PARENT PROGRAMS - The Incentive School Program will focus on the use of extended family members as tutors. aides, etc. In particular, parents/guardians and grandparents will be used on a regular basis in classrooms and other school activities (advisors, evaluators of programs, activity sponsors, etc.). All incentive school activities will reflect the philosophy that parents/guardians are the first teachers of children. Parents will be regarded as learning Cartners in the educational process of their childreji. II n someA cases, a 1n1u mVsb e%r of pas rents/gus ardi4 anss w.il*l ,be employed as aides with the expectation that they will complete college teaching degree programs leading to certification and possible career opportunities in the ^District. needs of parents. The incentive schools will also support the These schools will become learning and community centers accessible to parents and community organizations after regular school hours. Parent support workshops will be provided on a periodic basis throughout the school year (at least one workshop each guarter). These workshops will be directly related to the instructional activities in the classroom and will address topics such as: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) Reading skills Adult literacy (i.e. GED program, etc.) Math instruction skills Parent/child advocacy skills Use of community agencies and resources Counseling services Career opportunities Use of standardized tests Computer literacy Higher education oppportunities In addition to the parent support workshops, the incentive schools will use various strategies to increase the accessibility of the schools to parents and community members. COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION - Community participation in the incentive schools shall be encouraged by the involvement of community organizations, employers, civic and social organizations, and public agencies. Each school will participate in the Partner'Shi^ in Education Program and will maintain at least one business partnership. These organizations will be engaged in programs which extend learning experiences beyond the classroom. For instance, field trips, site career awareness opportunities, Saturday on- [-42- enrichment activities, and role model programs will be supported by business partners and/or various community organizations. The use of support programs is critical to the success of the Incentive School Program. In addition to the use of external monitoring sources, the building principal will be directly responsible for monitoring the effectiveness of all support programs. The effectiveness and progress of these programs will be prepared by the building principal and submitted to the Superintendent's office (including the Associate Superintendents) on a guarterly basis. Monitoring instruments used by external monitors will also address the effectiveness of support programs. Staff Selection Criteria: The principal will demonstrate: - knowledge of elementary curriculum. - a commitment to being a leader in staff development by initiating, participating in, monitoring, and maintaining inservice activities. - competency in interpersonal relations with faculty, students, parents, administration, community, and support staff. - a knowledge of and commitment to the differences and similarities among various socioeconomic, social, gender, and cultural groups. - the ability to apply the principles of child growth and development with faculty, students, parents, administrators, community, and support staff. - the ability to apply the concepts inherent in the principles of learning with faculty, students, parents, administrators, community, and support staff. - a knowledge of current educational theory/practices and the ability to make appropriate application in the development of the school population. The certified staff will demonstrate: - competency in the total teaching act. - commitment to the philosophy of the incentive school. - a commitment to participate in staff development activities and apply skills in the classroom. - the ability to teach to differences as evidenced by daily planning and delivery of instruction. - sensitivity to cultural differences as evidenced by the physical features of the classroom which should reflect the society (population) that it serves. Lead teachers will demonstrate the same competencies other certified teachers in addition to the following: as -43-- the ability to work with diverse cultural groups of students and parents. - the ability to accept change and adapt readily to new learning situations. - the ability and willingness to share successful teaching strategies with other teachers and students. - the ability to accept constructive criticism from fellow educators. - a strong interest in research. Lead teachers are those who model effective teaching strategies and are selected to serve as coaches for preprofessionals, student teachers, and peers. In addition to certified teachers and lead teachers, each incentive ( school will also have a permanent substitute teacher, the Little Rock School District will cox^jjd^r hiring Also, an administrator to coordinate and/or supervise the implementation of all programs at the incentive schools. /\\schools of choice, and intradistrict magnet schools. \\ The administrations Schools will be vacate-faculties in all incentive The process for reconstituting the administrations and faculties will include parents, students, teachers, and administrators. Staff Development: Although LRSD expects to assign to the incentive schools exceptionally qualified personnel, specific inservice will be necessary to implement the unique instructional program, following: Basic inservice will include the Mission and purpose of the incentive schools (1 day) Curriculum refinement (10 days) -Identification of desired learning outcomes -Identification of concepts and skills to be taught at each grade level -Delineation of the sequence of teaching topics for each grading period Overview of Program for Effective Teaching (PET)(1 day) Expectation Theory (Accepting Differences) (1 day) Student Team Learning (3 days) Developing Higher Order Thinking (1 day) Classroom/Discipline Management (2 days) Planning for Achievement Difference within the Whole Group Theory of Lesson Planning (1 day) Computer Training (1 day) Instructional Aide Inservice (1 day) Clerical Aide Inservice (1 day) Developing Parents as Partners Implementing the Homework Center Program for Accelerated Learning During the 1990-91 school year, maintenance activities for summer 1990 staff development activities will be conducted. Additional Staff Development Activities will include the following: PET (1 cycle) Developing Peer Tutors (2 days) Developing Adult Tutors (2 days) Teacher Expectations and Student Achievement (TESA) An annual assessment of staff development needs will be Program. conducted. Inservice activities will be scheduled based needs related to implementation of the Incentive School on The staff development department will coordinate inservice activiries------------- Recruitment\nAggressive marketing and recruitment are essential to the overall success of the Incentive School Program. Careful marketing of the Incentive School Program is the first step toward an effective recruitment program. The marketing campaign for the Incentive School Program will focus on two major strategies. First, all parents in the three school districts will be informed about programs available in the incentive schools. Second, in order to desegregate the incentive schools, various neighborhoods throughout Pulaski County will be targeted. the marketing strategies will emphasize the vmj, oppof^uni^ies available at the incentive schoo\" Iri_ech case^, igy Ts. l^arni^g All of the schools designated as incentive schools beginning in the 1990-91 school year currently have (as of October, 1989) racial percentages ranging from 84 to 99 percent black. The black percentage at Rockefeller is 84 percent black and the black percentage at Stephens is 99 percent black. The acceptable range, or desegregation requirement, for all elementary schools in the Little Rock School District is plus one-eighth and minus one-fourth the total black percentage at the elementary level, This formula, which is within the guidelines established by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, results in a range of 51 to 76.5 percent black. The purpose of the recruitment program is to comply with the desegregation requirements in each incentive school. 7 The recruitment program will encourage voluntary assignments that will not have an adverse effect on the desegregation requirement at each incentive school. Of course, the use of voluntary measures will necessitate long-range goals for full compliance with the desegregation requirement by the beginning of the 1996-97 school year. The annual goals for the number of white students needed to meet the desegregation requirements at each incentive school -45- are listed on the attachment. Desegregation Requirements.\" \"Annual Goals To Meet The incentive school recruitment program will focus on three objectives: 1) 2) To provide information to the community about the incentive school program. To use specific recruitment strategies for predominantly white neighborhoods throughout Pulaski 3) County. To monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the recruitment program for the incentive schools. As stated earlier, the various recruitment strategies will emphasize the unique learning opportunities at the incentive schools, on the following: In particular, emphasis will be placed 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) '8) 9) 10) 11) 12) Extended day learning opportunities Scholarships for post high school educational opportunities Foreign language instruction An individual education plan for each student Academic competition Homework Centers Computer literacy instruction Attractive facilities Low teacher/pupil ratios Emphasis on higher level thinking skills Permanent substitute teachers Saturday enrichment opportunities Each school-based Biracial Advisory Committee will be primarily responsible for implementing recruitment strategies. The school-based Biracial Advisory Committee consists of the building principal, teachers, parents, and students. The parent recruiters in the Little Rock School District Student Assignment Office will assist each schoolbased committee in developing and implementing specific recruitment activities. Although the parent recruiters will provide central office support for certain recruitment activities, it is believed that the most effective recruiting comes from the parents, students, and building staff. In addition to the specific recruitment activities implemented at the school level, the parent recruiters will conduct the following activities to meet the objectives of the incentive school recruitment program: -46- A. To provide information to the community about the Incentive School Program. 1) 2) Information booths at prominent shopping centers and malls throughout Pulaski County. Develop highlight sheets and distribute to all elementary students in Pulaski County. Highlight B. 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) sheets will also be displayed in local businesses. Insert highlight sheets in bills of utility companies. Conduct information sessions with special audiences (i.e. PTA Council, PAC Council, Junior League, League of Women Voters, Chamber of Commerce Education Committee, Realtors Association, etc.) Develop and distribute generic public service announcements (PSA's) to all media. Public service announcements will be a part of an ongoing media blitz to heighten public awareness regarding incentive schools. Billboards, bus benches, etc., will also be used to advertise generic information about incentive schools. Produce short videocassette recordings to be used in public presentations (i.e. PTA meetings, realtors, etc.) Seek incentive school endorsements from local celebrities. Conduct individual and small group recruitment meetings with potential parents. In addition to the above. The Little Rock School District Offices of Desegregation and Communication will be responsible for the following: a) b) c) Hire a marketing expert to develop and implement a multi-year marketing campaign. Conduct an ongoing media blitz that focuses on the positive aspects of the incentive school program. Highlight incentive schools in all district publications. To use specific recruitment strategies for targeted neighborhooods throughout Pulaski County. 1) 2) Assist school-based committees in targeting geographic areas/neighborhoods for informational blitz regarding specific incentive schools. Information will also stress group preference as an assignment option. A^ist schools in developing small group Information\" tours to acquaint parents. \"For Your grandparents, businessmen, realtors, etc., with the incentive schools. 3) 4) 5) Conduct meetings with NLRSD and PCSSD parents and PTA groups to encourage M-M transfers to incentive schools. Work closely with student assignment offices in NLRSD and PCSSD and the Magnet Fducat i nna-i Team (MET) to target specific neighborhoods for \" recruitment activities. Assist each incentive school in establishing and 7 6 ..y ' C. scheduling a speaker's bureau. The parents of white students enrolled in the incentive schools will be encouraged to serve on the bureau along with celebrities, teachers, students, etc. To monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the recruitment program for the incentive schools. The Little Rock School District Biracial Advisory Committee will also serve as the steering committee for the incentive school recruitment program. The Little Rock School District Office of Desegregation will be responsible for compiling bi-monthly reports on the implementation and effectiveness of various recruitment strategies. These reports will be shared with the Little Rock School District Board of Directors, Joshua and Knight Intervenors, and the Metropolitan Supervisor. The bi-monthly reports will be developed by each school-based Biracial Advisory Committee. The Districtwide Biracial Advisory Committee will review each bi-monthly report and recommend to the Board of Directors and/or Office of Desegregation any changes needed in recruitment strategies/activities. The Biracial Advisory Committee will also appoint two ex-officio members with expertise in marketing/ advertising to ac^ise the committee on recruitment strategies. Thei^jstrictwid^ Biracial Advisory Committee will visit the incentive schools once each quarter. Among other things, the committee will evaluate the recruitment program in each building. The evaluation of the recruitment program will be addressed in the quarterly monitoring/evaluation report for each incentive school. Post High School Scholarships: The incentive school program is intended to provide both short-term and long-term opportunities for educational excellence. As incentive school students experience the short term benefits of high quality learning experiences in grades K-6, it is imperative that they have the resources needed to extend their educational careers to post high school learning experiences. To this end, a scholarship program will be provided for all LRSD incentive school students. A trust fund will be established for each student who completes at least one full school year at an incentive school. Each student will earn $400 for each full year of enrollment in an incentive school. Each student will receive the amount deposited plus interest as the earned scholarship amount. Upon graduation or withdrawal from an incentive school, the total amount awarded for each full year of enrollment will be placed in a trust fund. The trust fund will be administered by a committee made up of two representatives from the Little Rock School District and one representative from the Arkansas Department of Education, Joshua Intervenors, and the Knight Intervenors. A student must enroll in a post high school institution within two years of graduation from high school in order to receive incentive school scholarship funds. Scholarship payments will be made directly to the post high school institution. -49- SUGGESTED TIME ALLOTMENT SCHEDULE FOR THE INCENTIVE SCHOOLS TIME: Regular Day 8:00-3:00 7 hours Extended Day 3:00-5:00 -'2 1/2 hours Extended Saturday 8:00-12:00 *4 hours hours(instruction) *2 hours(instruction) *3 1/2 hrs(instruction) 1 hour(lunch/break) 30 min.(snack/break) 30 min (snack/break) GRADES: Kindergarten - One - Two - Ihree/Regular Day 8:00 - 3:00 BLOCKS (Daily) TIME (Weekly) * Reading 90 min. Apx. 450 min. -'Language Arts - Spelling - Handwriting - Conmunication (Oral/Written) - Literature - Library Mathematics ^Social Living - Science (Health-Safety) - Social Studies (History-Economics- Geography) Fine Arts/P.E. - Art * - Music - P.E. TOTAL 90 min. Apx. 450 min. 45 min. Apx. 225 min. 60 min. 45 min. 330 min. Apx. 300 min. Apx. 225 min. Apx. 1650 min. C'/f '-'REGULAR DAY 8:00 - 3:00 7 hours 6 hours (Instruction) 1 hour (Lunch/Recess) -'Exercises in Foreign Languages can be integrate^d with any of these areas. /I -50- EXTENDED DAY (3:00-5:30) (2 HOURS/30 MIN.) [2 hours - Instruction [30 min. - Snack/Break Recreation: - Intramural Sports - Games 60 min. Apx. 300 min. Study Center: - Reinforce Basic Skills - Enhance Research Skills - Homework 30 min. Apx. 150 min. Creativity: - Dance/Drama - Arts/Crafts 30 min. Apx. 150 min. TOTAL 120 min. Apx. 600 min. EXTENDED SATURDAY (8:00-12:00) (4 HOURS) [3 hours - Instruction] [30 min. - Snack/Break] Field Type Experience: - In school experiences (outside resource persons/ materials) - Outside of school experiences 70 min. Creative Expression: - Read ing/Wr i t ing - Listening/Speaking Clubs/Events: - Computer - Art - Dance/Drama - Intramural Sports TOTAL 70 min. 70 min. 210 min. -51- TIME: Regular Day 8:00-3:00 *7 hours Extended Day 3:00-5:30 * 2 1/2 hours Extended Saturday 8:00-12:00 *4 hours \u0026gt;'\u0026lt;6 hours (instruction) * 2 hours (instruction) *3 1/2 hrs (ins true tion) 1 hour(Lunch/Recess) 30 min(snack/break) 30 min(snack/break) GRADES: Fourth - Fifth - Sixth/Regular Day 8:00 - 3:00 BLOCKS (Daily) TIME (Weekly) 'Language Arts: - Reading - Spelling - Handwriting - Conmunication(oral/written) - Literature - Library 150 min. Apx. 750 min. Mathematics 60 min. Apx. 300 min. Social Studies: - Geography - History - Economics 45 min. Apx. 225 min. Science: - Health - Safety 30 min. Apx. 150 min. Fine Arts/P.E.: - Art - Music - P.E. 45 min. Apx. 225 min. TOTAL 330 min. 1650 min. -'Exercises in Foreign Languages can be integrated with any of these areas. -52- EXTENDED DAY (3:00-5:30) (2 HOURS/30 MIN.) [120 Min. - Instruction] [ 30 Min. - Snack/Break] Recreation: - Intramural Sports - Games 60 min. Apx. 300 min. Study Center: - Reinforcement of Basic Skills - Enhancement of Research Skills - Homework Creativity - Dance/Drama - Arts/Crafts TOTAL 30 min. 30 min 120 min. Apx. 150 min. Apx. 150 min. Apx. 600 min. EXTENDED SATURDAY (8:00-12:00) (4 HOURS) [210 Min. - Instruction Field Type Experience: - In school experiences (outside resource persons/ materials) - Outside of school experiences (field trips, etc.) Creative Expression: - Reading/Writing - Listening/Speaking Clubs/Events: - Computer-Art-Dance/Drama - Intramural Sports TOTAL [ 30 Min. - Snack/Break, 70 min. 70 min. 70 min. 210 min. -53- ATTACHMENT I ANNUAL GOALS TO MEET DESEGREGATION REQUIREMENTS (Number of White Students) Garland Ish Mitchel 1 Rightsei 1 Rockefeller Stephens Total 1989-90 14 7 19 17 35 1 93 1990-91 18 14 24 23 40 10 129 1991-92 28 20 33 29 45 19 174 1992-93 38 26 42 35 51 28 220 1993-94 48 32 51 41 57 37 266 1994-95 58 38 60 48 63 46 313 1995-96 68 44 69 56 73 58 368 1996-97 78 50 78 64 83 71 424 Capacity 310 200 310 255 330 285 1,690 -53a- Area Schools Schools where students attend based entirely on attendance zone identification and which are not designated as incentive schools are called area schools, the following: These include Area Schools Senior High Schools: J.A. Fair Hall McClellan Junior High Schools\nCloverdale Forest Heights Henderson Mabelvale Pulaski Heights Southwest Elementary Schools\nBadgett Bale Baseline Brady Chicot Cloverdale Dodd Fair Park Forest Park Franklin - Fulbright Geyer Springs Jefferson Mabelvale McDermott Meadowcliff Otter Creek Pulaski Heights Romine Terry Wakefield Watson Western Hills Wilson Woodruff The academic program in elementary area schools will concentrate on language arts, reading, mathematics, science, and social studies to help ensure that students master basic skills. Instruction will also be provided in health, physical education, practical arts, and the fine arts. All -54- elementary schools will be equipped with a 28-station computer laboratory for remedial and enrichment opportunities. In the junior high schools, students will take required courses as well as electives from among choral, instrumental music, art, physical education, Spanish, French, and business courses. Regular and enriched classes in math, English, social studies, and science are offered to meet individual needs. The senior high schools will offer all courses required for high school graduation. Students may choose from various courses in the areas of foreign languages, mathematics, social studies, science, speech, journalism. fine arts, business education, and home economics. honors, and advanced placement courses are offered in various subject areas. Regular, In addition to the core curriculum, all of the area schools will offer the following special programs: Gifted and Talented Education Special Education Program for Accelerated Learning CARE Program (elementary only) DARE (Drug Alcohol Resistance Education) sixth grade classes Extracurricular activities all The area schools will receive the following as a result of the District's desegregation plan: All English, math, science, social studies, special education, foreign language, and music teachers will participate in cooperative learning, PET (Program for Effective Teaching), TESA (Teacher Expectations and Student Achievement), and classroom management training. Supplementary language arts, math, science, social studies, reading, and foreign language materials and supplies for multiethnic infusion will be provided at all area schools. --All junior high area schools will offer journalism (newspaper and yearbook). Manipulatives will be provided for math instruction in all area schools. All area schools will be provided inservice training on the use of multiethnic curriculum guided Concrete \"hands-on\" science materials will be purchased for elementary science instruction. Library/media services will provide for an extension and enrichment of basic skills and will also accommodate the varied learning styles of students in different instructional groups.\nhe District will continue to have at least one library clerk to implement the new library/media program.^ A 7-10 A-V equipment purchase plan will be used to support ear this program. Inservices for teachers and support staff on relevant, practical issues involving the education of handicapped students. District-wide parent support programs and access to the Learning Cent-er that will provide parent training and assistance. Handicapped students utilize computers in the learning process in resource rooms at the elementary and junior high levels. A Community Based Instruction Program (CBI) is available for moderately/severely handicapped students. Academic Progress Incentive Grants: 4 the Academic success for all students is a primary goal of desegregationyiijit.egratiqnprpcess. ol District has developed and adop The Little Rock School deveTbped adopted several programs designed to increase student achievement. District-wide achievement data indicate the need for additional strategies to reduce the number of low achievers. Therefore, the Academic Progress Incentive Grants Program will be established, follows: The program goals are as 1. 2. To improve the education for all students To reduce the disproportion in academic achievement that is evident between groups formed on the basis of race, gender, and economic status. Local schools will develop non-competitive proposals to increase overall achievement and decrease academic disparity. The proposals should include strategies based on promising practices to enhance student achievement. Teachers, building administrators, and patrons shall participate in the development of the local school proposal. A grant writing inservice will be provided by the District. A request for proposals will be announced. The non-competitive grant will be fo option for two additional annual awards, annual grant shall not exceed $25,000^/ 7 ^one year with an The amount of the Magnet schgols and incentive schools will not be eligible for the Academic Progress Incentive Grants. Additionally, area schools will be given before magnet schools or incentive schools to r iportunities^ additional assistance to establish \"islands of excellence\" or model classrooms in their schools. For example a school might wish to develop a model classroom in social studies. Additional resources and assistance from the central administration will be provided and a model classroom will be established. Teachers and administrators from other schools will be encouraged to visit the classroom to gain new ideas and insights into effective teaching techniques which they can then use in their schools and classrooms. Community Support Grants: The availability of extra resources in magnet and incentive schools continues to be an area of concern for many parents in the area schools. Although special funds have been earmarked for magnet and incentive schools, enhancement opportunities must be available in all schools. All schools must have the resources needed to offer quality desegregated learning experiences. In order for quality 7 desegregated learning experiences to occur, all schools must have access to extra resources needed for program enhancement. Non-competitive Community Support Grants will be provided to address the recruitment needs of area schools. Community Support Grants will be used to support local efforts to improve desegregation. Emphasis will be placed on awarding grant proposals that have a positive effect on desegregation efforts. 1. 2. 3. 4 . 5. 6. Grant-writing teams will consist of at least the building principal, two teachers, one noncertified staff member, and four parents. A Grant Writing inservice will be provided by the District. A central office committee made up of the Associate Superintendent for Desegregation Monitoring and Program Development and others appointed by the Superintendent will evaluate grant proposals. Grant proposals should avoid additional personnel costs, to the extent possible. The District will not assume responsibility for continuing costs that occur after the expiration of the funding period. k Local businesses will be asked to help finance the Community support Grant program. This will give II..',1'\",Hl 7 . local businesses the opportunity to become actively involved in the District's desegregation efforts. Magnet schools, incentive schools, and schools of choice will not be eligible for Community Support Grants. J' I I ',1 I Schools cannot fulfill desegregation reguirements without the involvement of the communities which they serve. The use of Community Support Grants will encourage entrepreneurship, ownership, and commitment to local desegregation efforts. The three-year grant awards (Academic Progress Grants and Community Support Grants) should provide sufficient time for the new strategies to become a part of the school culture. schools. Certain changes are proposed for some of the area These are outlined below. 1. wi Woodruff Elementary Expand the school by adding approximately tA^ hundred students. Some of these classrooms program. be usedfor an early childhood education Also, an Extended Day Program will be offered to attract children of parents who work in the state government offices. A percentage of seats will be reserved in order to meet desegregation reguirements. 2 . Western Hills Elementary 7 Expand the school's capacity, and eliminate the use of portables. Approximately one hundred children attend classes in portable buildings at Western Hills. This plan would expand the capacity of the school by two hundred students. available by 1991-92. Additional spaces will be 3. Cloverdale Elementary and Junior High School Expand each school's capacity by approximately one hundred students. 4 . Portable Buildincfs Eliminate portable buildings in a five-year period beginning in 1990-91. The schools having the largest concentration of portable buildings will be the first priority. Specialty Schools Some of the District's area schools already have special themes, and nothing in this plan precludes their continuing to develop them. However, one specialty school, Badgett Elementary, is described in detail because it relates closely to the theme of the aviation/transportation magnet school to be located near the airport. Aviation/Transportation Specialty School: Badgett's instructional program will be structured around a transportation theme. interdisciplinary concept. Transportation is an It includes science, technology. history, geography, mathematics, international studies, and human services. A transportation theme would be ideal for the development and implementation of an interdisciplinary curriculum. The central Arkansas region has a wealth of transportation industries. Air, rail, trucking, and boat/barge transportation are all located in central Arkansas. These industries should serve as a resource for the Aviation/Transportation Specialty School. The Aviation/Transportation Specialty School has the following goals: A. B. C. D. Students will learn the District's basic curriculum through the theme of transportation. The instructional program will be enriched by field trips, guest speakers, and special events related to transportation. Concepts and skills about transportation will be mastered so that students will be prepared for the Aviation/Transportation Junior High School should they choose to apply. The thematic approach to the delivery of instruction will increase student learning through increased motivation and greater transfer of prior learning. The Aviation/Transportation Specialty Elementary School will utilize an interdisciplinary curriculum that emanates from the theme of transportation. Social studies will focus on the effect of transportation on the location of cities and communities. routes will be examined. Geographic influences on transportation History will be taught in the context of transportation's influence on human endeavors. Science will deal with the physics involved in transportation (e.g., mechanics of flight) as well as the inventions that had a major impact on society at the time (e.g., steam engine, airplane). Many basic science skills can be taught from a transportation reference point. Simple machines, sound, energy, and natural resources, for example, all relate to transportation. -59- To enhance the climate of the school, the transportation theme will be obvious to those who visit the school. Bulletin boards, hall displays, assembly programs. and other instructional activities will emphasize transportation. Guest speakers and field trips will frequently incorporate transportation ideas. One or more specialists will help deliver the school's instructional The specialists will coordinate efforts to develop an interdisciplinary curriculum with a transportation theme. program. They will head-up the curriculum development process and will assist in inservice for other staff members. Students will take field trips to local transportation industries such as Little Rock Municipal Airport, Falcon Jet, Central Flying Service, Arkansas Highway Department, Union Pacific Railroad, Terry or Murray Lock and Dam, and the Little Rock Port Authority. Speakers from the transportation industries will present programs in the classroom. J. Cl III J.11 L.XIC? Due to the proximity of Badgett and the Junior High Aviation and Transportation Intradistrict Magnet School, cooperative projects between the schools will be common. Junior high students can present lessons to the elementary students. Elementary students can do assembly programs (song, dance, skits) for the junior high students. Tutoring, mentorships, and other projects can also be worked out between the schools. Other specialty schools will be considered in the long range plan. For example, if it appears necessary to close an existing elementary building, other uses for the building will be sought including the creation of an alternative school for students in grades 10-12 or an early childhood and infant care center. Also, to extend the aviation and transportation theme, administrators in vocational education will begin working with the Arkansas Department of Education to establish programs at the Metropolitan Vocational Education Center to prepare students for careers in aviation mechanics and other transportation related areas, place by 1992-93. These programs will be in 60 C. Publicity and Information Often the success or failure of a school depends on the extent to which accurate, timely, and clear information is provided to parents and students about its programs and unique features. As the programs for schools of choice. intradistrict magnets, incentive schools, area schools, and specialty schools are planned and developed, parents will be encouraged to participate fully in the process by contributing their ideas and suggestions. The District will explain and publicize the programs available at each school to parents, students, and the general community through the use of the District's television channel, through printed brochures describing each school, and through ongoing contact with the education reporters for the local newspapers and television stations. Information coordinators (described in Chapter 8) for each school will assist in developing information brochures and obtaining publicity for their schools. III. INSTRUCTION A. Equity in Academic Achievement B. Early Childhood Education C. Multicultural Education D. Special Education E. Gifted and Talented Education F. Guidance and Counseling G. Extracurricular Activities -62- III. INSTRUCTION A. Equity in Academic Achievement If the desegregation of a school district does not result in a superior education experience for all students, then it is not successful no matter how \"balanced\" schools may be. It is not acceptable to bring children to the doors of the school house only to resegregate them again in their classes and programs throughout the school day. This section of the plan identifies problems related to equity in the academic achievement of our students and proposes ways to address their problems. Problem One: Disparity in educational achievement between black and white students (as evidenced by grades and standardized tests) continues despite several years of awareness of the issue and efforts to deal with it. It is clear that the disparity in educational achievement between black and white students worsens as students move from grade to grade. It is necessary, therefore, that this desegregation plan address this very serious problem. The following solutions are proposed: 1. Conduct a \"curriculum audit\" of instructional programs and services during the next five years according to a prearranged schedule to determine their educational effectiveness for all youngsters. Programs to be audited include, but are not limited to: -63- Art Chapter I Reading and Math Drug Education Foreign Languages Four-Year-Old Program Gifted and Talented Education Guidance and Counseling Homework Centers Kindergarten Language Arts Learning Lab Library-Media Mathematics Music Physical Education, Health, and Nutrition Education Program for Accelerated Learning (PAL) Reading Science Social Studies Special Education Vocational Education The first programs to be audited will include Chapter I Reading and Math, Guidance and Counseling, PAL, Learning Lab, and Foreign Languages. The purpose of the review will be to -64- determine whether modifications in programs need to be made in order to increase their educational value to students. In some cases programs may need to be eliminated or drastically changed. Seek assistance in establishing an Instructional Management System for every student. Technology now exists which can help us analyze a student's learning styles and achievement levels, predict success or failure in school based on a number of factors, and prescribe the necessary interventions in a timely manner. The District will immediately seek to work with experts in instructional technology to devise such a system. It should be noted that this approach is intended to benefit the successful as well as the unsuccessful student. The District will attempt to have this program in place by 1991-92. Begin immediately to develop a five-year schedule for the review of all courses and programs including incentive schools and magnet programs to determine whether their content is sufficiently challenging, relevant, and enriching to students. Require that curriculum supervisors review the use of the multiethnic curriculum guides and propose necessary revisions and modifications. This will 2. 3. 4. -65- be done yearly so that problems which become apparent can be quickly solved. Problem Two: The District continues to have disproportionate representation of students by race in certain classes, programs, and activities. This is not a problem to be addressed by simplistic solutions such as quotas or percentages which are humiliating and frustrating to students. All students, both the gifted and the low-achieving, must be given every opportunity to excel, be challenged. contribute, and produce in school. This problem must be addressed first by being certain that a strong basic education is provided to all students beginning with kindergarten or before and that provision is made to concentrate on youngsters who need the enrichment experience and activities to enable them to compete with more advantaged students and not lose ground as they move from grade to grade. These include additional or extended homework centers, summer learning programs, Saturday classes. Extended Day program, academic incentive programs, and tutorial services. In schools which lack these programs, the District will allocate funds to establish at least one such program in each school. To a large extent principals, teachers, and guidance counselors can positively impact this problem. However, they must be supported by a Board and an -66-administration which insist on optimum learning opportunities for all students. The extent to which staff development can assist teachers and administrators in dealing with this problem will be discussed in another section of this plan. Problem Three\nIn too many instances different expectations for the level of learning are expected from different students. Most students can learn most of what they should know. The research on this issue is irrefutable. The question is why students do not learn, and the answer has to do with what is expected from them. The District has already recognized the problem of different expectations and is attempting to provide training for all teachers in a program called Teacher Expectations and Student Achievement (TESA). As part of the long-term plan, TESA will be required and provided for all teachers, administrators, library media specialists, and guidance counselors. Additionally, Cooperative Learning, and the Program for Effective Teaching will be included. These programs and others will be discussed in the section on staff development (Chapter 7). Also, in instances where teachers have had success in teaching low-achieving students, the District will provide opportunities for other teachers to visit -67-B. \"model classrooms\" where successful teachingand learningfor all students are occurring. Early Childhood Education Someone recently stated that the answer to the drug problem in society was not to build more prisons but to establish early childhood education programs in the schools. The Little Rock School District has experienced success with the HIPPY Program and its four-year-old programs at Washington, Ish, Franklin, Stephens, and Rockefeller. However, it is clear that such programs must be expanded. Their development (including the expansion of the three- year-old program) and implementation should occur following the District's review of final recommendations made by the Early Childhood Education Task Force. The District will add an additional program at Woodruff in 1990-91 and will initiate a Montessori program at Garland in 1991-92. In 1991-92 the Early Childhood Programs will be evaluated and plans to expand them to other schools will be submitted to the Board. The District will also establish Parent Centers at Washington and Franklin to provide assistance to the parents of children enrolled in the programs there. A major goal of the Little Rock School District's Parent Center component is to combine the special knowledge which parents have about their children with the expertise of the staff to improve services to children. -68-The Parent Center will be developed and implemented by local school staff, social workers, counselors, media center staff, and other related personnel to reinforce and maintain a strong linkage between home and school. Parents will be invited to attend the Center to share information. express concerns, make plans, and develop skills to assist in the education of their children. The Center will provide parent discussion groups, individual problem-solving sessions, and other topics of interest identified by the parents such as creative use of family time. A range of evening programs will be offered throughout the year on such topics as parenting, community resources, behavior management, study skills, and recreation and special seminars such as helping working and single parents to become more involved in spending quality time with their child. The District will include the Arkansas Parents: Partners in Learning Experience (APPLE) parent training material developed by the Arkansas Department of Education and other research-based programs. The Parent Centers will be evaluated by the District in 1991-92. The goal is to have early childhood programs and Parent Centers in at least half of the elementary schools by 1994-95 and in all elementary schools by 1998-99. The recommendations of the Little Rock School District Early Childhood Education Parent Committee are comprehensive and thorough and will provide the basis for an expansion of -69-the District's Early Childhood Education Program as a part of the District's desegregation plan. The District will work with the Early Childhood Education Task Force in analyzing these proposals, both in terms of the District's capacity to implement them and the costs of the programs. A detailed cost estimate, with final recommendations for early childhood education, will be provided to the Metropolitan Supervisor prior to December 31 C. Multicultural Education In its commitment to provide equal educational access for all students, the Little Rock School District included in its 1988-89 court mandated desegregation plan the development and implementation of a multicultural education program for grades K-12. Multicultural education seeks to ensure that male and female students, exceptional students, and students who are members of diverse racial, ethnic, and cultural groups will have an equal chance to achieve academically in school. In essence, multicultural education includes (1) the infusion of multicultural content when appropriate into the core subject matter areas\n(2) the use of various instructional/learning strategies to address diverse learning styles of students\nand (3) the demonstration of the attitude and belief that all students, regardless of cultural diversity, can learn. 70Multicultural education has several goals: 1. The development of decision-making and social action skills. 2. The viewing of historical and contemporary events from diverse ethnic perspectives, clarifying students' own ethnic identities and helping them to function effectively within their own ethnic communities. 3. The development of cross-cultural competency\nthe ability to function within a range of cultures. 4. Providing students with cultural and ethnic alternatives to problems. 5. Greater self-understanding by viewing one's self from the perspectives of others' cultures. 6. The reduction of ethnic, racial, and cultural conflict and discrimination through the expanding of students' conceptions of what it means to be human and the development of an appreciation for and sensitivity to the diversity of lifestyles. 7. Mastery of essential reading, writing, and computational skills. To achieve these goals the District is currently involved in the following six-year plan: Note: This plan modifies the multicultural program approved by the court in the 1989-90 Desegregation Plan Volume 1, January 31, 1989. Phase I (1987-88) - Awareness for district staff -71-members and input from cultural groups within the community. Phase II (1988-89) - Development of curriculum guides by committees of teachers of grades K-6 in the following content areas: English, fine arts, math, reading, science. and social studies. (1989-90) - Implementation of the above grades K-6 curriculum guides. Phase III (1989-90) - Development of curriculum guides by committees of teachers of grades 7-12 for art, music. English, reading, math, science, library-media, social studies (grade 7), and American History/Arkansas History (grade 8). Phase IV (1990-91) - Implementation of the curriculum guides for grades 7-12 for art, music, English, reading. math, science, and library-media. Phase V (1991-92) - Development of curriculum guides as follows: a) Civics (grade 9) b) American Government (grades 10-12) c) American History (regular - grades 10-12) d) American History (AP - Grade 11) e) Contemporary American History and Arkansas Studies (grades 11 and 12) Phase VI (1992-93) - Continued development of curriculum guides as follows: a) Sociology and Psychology (Grades 11-12) b) Any courses added to the social studies -72- curriculum (Grades 11-12) c) Refinement of existing course guides (if needed) (Grades 11-12) The Little Rock School District is on schedule according to the above six-year plan. Periodic review of the content of the guides and their use by teachers will assist in making modifications or in providing staff development to assist teachers in using the guides. D. Special Education Much work has been done to lower the over- representation of black students in special education classes. Efforts have focused on helping special education teachers, principals, and regular teachers do a better job of analyzing the needs of youngsters. Extensive training and follow-up are provided by the special education staff and these efforts will continue. Special inservice training has been provided to help teachers understand and cope with the vulnerability of black male children in society. Disproportion is a continuous issue, and tremendous progress has been made in addressing it in the District. Targeted goals for the Special Education Department include: 1, The development and implementation of a comprehensive sex education program for handicapped students, (1991-92) -73-2. The expansion of the Learning Cerf concept to include a center at the junior high level. (1991- 5. E. 92) Expansion of the use of the Consulting Teacher Model to provide indirect services to mildly handicapped student\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1217","title":"Major Enhancement Schools, First Year Report, 1988-89","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1989-12"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational statistics","School management and organization"],"dcterms_title":["Major Enhancement Schools, First Year Report, 1988-89"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1217"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":["200 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nIN THE UNITED STATES 01STqICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF AR~ANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT VS. ~O. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL PLl\u0026gt;.I~TIFF DISTRICT, et al. DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, et al. INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al. INTERVENORS LRSD MAJOR ENHANCEMENT SCHOOLS FIRST YEAR REPORT, 1988-1989 In February 1988, pursuant to the instructions of this Court, the Special Master submitted his interim report and recommendations to this Court. After a careful study of those recommendations as submitted, this Court filed an Order on April 27, 1988 accepting and approving the Special Master's recommendations. As part of the court-approved recommendations, the LRSD was required to provide major enhancements to the schools in the District which were racially identifiable. The recommendations also included a program monitoring component which would provide an assessment of the major enhancement schools (formerly known as racially identifiable schools). The evaluation/monitoring design was to provide data for use in comparing various components of the major enhancement schools with those in other schools in the LRSD. For instance, data collected from the major enhancement schools regarding expenditures per student, pupil/teacher ratios, -1- library books per child, academic preparation of teachers and years of teaching experience would be compared with similar data from other schools in the LRSD. In accordance with that program monitoring component, the LRSD and the appropriate committees conducted the required monitoring visits, collected the relevant data and the LRSD now submi ts the major enhancement schools' first year report, 1988-89. That report is attached hereto as Exhibit 5 and incorporated herein by reference. The LRSD continues to monitor and evaluate the major enhancement schools and has already submitted Monitoring Progress Report No. 1 for the 1989-90 school year. That report was attached as Exhibit 3 to the LRSD Desegregation Plan Status Report for first semester 1989-90 school year. ~espectfully submitted, FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Building 400 West Capitol Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Attorneys for the Little Rock School District ~ - ... /J . ,'1/4 . By: ~~fi-\n/)\n0 =\u0026gt; ~ JERRY L. MALONE BAR ID. 85096 -2- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Jerry L. Malone, do hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing LRSD Major Enhancement Schools' First Year Report, 1988-1989, has been sent to the following list of counsel by United States Mail, postage prepaid, on this 5 711 day of March, 1990. 8/lrsd/ejl John W. Walker, Esquire Attorney at Law 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 Norman Chachkin, Esquire LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 99 Hudson St., 16th Floor New York, New York 10013 Richard W. Roachell, Esquire MITCHELL \u0026amp; ROACHELL 1014 West Third Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Stephen W. Jones, Esquire JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 425 West Capitol Avenue 3400 TCBY Tower Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Sharon Street, Esquire ARKANSAS DEPT. OF EDUCATION Education Building #4 Capitol Mall Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 -3- Paul L. Cherry, Esquire ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE Heritage West Building 201 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Steve Fedo, Esquire NEAL, GERBER \u0026amp; EISENBERG 208 South LaSalle Chicago, Illinois 60604 H. William Allen, Esquire Attorney at Law 200 West Capitol, Suite 1200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 M. Samuel Jones, Esquire WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 200 West Capitol, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 I I II d d HERSCHEL H. FRIOAY. P.A. B. S. CLARK ROBERT V. LIGHT, P.A. WILLIAM H. SUTTON. P.A. GEORGE E. Pt KE, JR . P.A. JAMES W. MOORE WILLIAM L, PATTON, JR .. P.A. BYRON M. EISEMAN, JR., P.A. JOE O. SELL. P.A. MICHAEL G. THOMPSON, P.A. JOHN C. ECHOLS, P.A. JAMES A. BUTTRY. P.A. FREOER1CK S. URSERY, P.A. H. T. LARZELERE, ?.A. OSCAR E. DAVIS, JR, JAMES C. CLARK, JR., P.A. THOMAS P. LEGGETT, P.A. JOHN DEWEY WATSON, P.A. LEWIS MATHIS, P.A. PAUL B, BENHAM 111, P.A. LARRY W. BURKS. P.A. A. WYCKLtFF NISBET, JR., P.A. JAM ES EDWARD HARRIS, P.A. J. PHILLIP MALCOM, P.A. JAMES M. SIMPSON, P.A. MEREDITH P. CATLETT. P.A. JAM ES M. SAXTON J. SHEPHERD RUSSELL IH DONALD H. BACON, P.A. ROBERT K. WALSH WILLIAM THOMAS BAXTER. P.A. WALTER A. PAULSON 11, P.A. FRIDAY, ELDRED GE \u0026amp; CLAR K A PARTNERSHIP OF INOIVIDUALS AND PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS ATT ORNEYS AT LAW 2000 FIRST COMMERCIAL BUILDING 400 WEST CAPITOL LITTLE ROCK, AR KANSAS 7220 1 TELEPHONE Marc h 5, 1 990 BARRY E. COPLIN. P.A. RICHARD D. TAYLOR, P.A.. JOSEPHS. HURST, JR  P.A. ELIZABETH J. ROBBEN, P.A. CHRISTOPHER HELLER. P.A. LAURA A. HENSLEY. P.A. ROBERTS. SHAFER WILLIAM M. GRIFFIN JI! THOMAS N. ROSE MICHAELS. MOORE DIANE S. MACKEY WALTER M. EBEL 111 KEVIN A. CRASS WILLIAM A. WADDELL, JR. CLYDE \"TAB\" TURNER CALVIN J. HALL SCOTTJ.LANCASTER JERRY L. MALONE M. GAYLE CORLEY ROBERT B. BEACH, JR. S. RANDOLPH LOONEY .J. LEE BROWN .JAMES C. BAKER, JR. H. CHARLES GSCHWEND, JR. HARRY A. LIGHT HANK .JACKSON SCOTT H. TUCKER JOHN CLAYTON RANDOLPH MARY L. WISEMAN GUY ALTON WADE PRICE C. GARDNER THOMAS F. MEEKS WILLIAM .J. SMITH 7 WILLIAM A. ELDREDGE. JR,. P.A . WILLIAM L. TERRY John W. Walker, Esquire Attorney at Law 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 Norman Chachkin, Esquire LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 99 Hudson St., 16th New York, New York Floor 10013 Richard W. Roachell, Esquire MITCHELL \u0026amp; ROACHELL 1014 West Third Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Stephen W. Jones, Esquire JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 425 West Capitol Avenue 3400 TCBY Tower Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Sharon Street, Esquire ARKANSAS DEPT. OF EDUCATION Education Building #4 Capitol Mall Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 TELE.COPIER (SOI) 376-2147 TELE.COPIER (SOil 376~6369 WFIITEA:'S 01F1C'f NO. Paul L. Cherry, Esquire ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE Heritage West Building 201 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Steve Fedo, Esquire NEAL, GERBER \u0026amp; EISENBERG 208 South LaSalle Chicago, Illinois 60604 H. William Allen, Esquire Attorney at Law 200 West Capitol, Suite 1200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 M. Samuel Jones, Esquire WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 200 West Capitol, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Re: LRSD v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. I March 5, 1990 Page 2 Ladies \u0026amp; Gentlemen: Enclosed please find a copy of the LRSD Major Enhancement Schools' First Year Report, 1988-1989 which is being filed in this matter. By copy of this letter a copy of this Report is going to the Metropolitan supervisor, Mr. Eugene Reveille. Thank you for your attention to this matter. JLM:ejl Enclosure cc: Mr. Eugene Reville Dr. Ruth Steele Mr. James Jennings - ~ ~\n~::M:{one LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Dr. Ruth Steele, Superintendent Dr. Herbert Cleek, Deputy Superintendent MAJOR ENHANCEMENT SCHOOLS FIRST YEAR REPORT, 1988-89 PLANNING, RESEARCH, AND EVALUATION DEPARTMENT Sterling Ingram, Director Little Rock, Arkansas December 1989 335 I Estelle Matthis, Associate Superintendent Educational Programs and Staff Development James Jennings, Associate Superintendent Desegregation and Program Monitoring Compiled by Ethel B. Dunbar Sharon A. Brooks Betty J. Davis Dr. Selma Hobby Dr. Paul J. Smith Sue Tadlock Contributing Specialists PLANNING, RESEARCH, AND EVALUATION DEPARTMENT Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 374-3361 33 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 A Comparison of Average Years of 9 Tea.ching Experience Major Enhancement Schools to Control Schools Table 2 A Comparison of Teacher Absences 9 at the Major Enhancement Schools and Control Schools to the District Average Table 3 Major Enhancement Schools Racial 10 Composition of Teaching Staff Table 4 Major Enhancement and Control 13 School Maintenance Expenditures Table 5 Major Enhancement School 14 Chapter I Reading Expenditures Table 6 Major Enhancement and Control 16 School Supply Expenditures Table 7 Major Enhancement and Control 22 School Gifted Program Report Table 8 Major Enhancement and Control 27 School Percentage of Pupil Attendance Table 9 Major Enhancement/Quality Control 33 Monitoring Checklist Summary Table 10 Major Enhancement Teacher Survey 40 Table 11 Major Enhancement Parent survey 41 Table 12 MAT-6 District Summary-Variance 42 from LRSD Mean of National Percentile Ranks (NPR) by School 337 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH, AND EVALUATION DEPARTMENT MAJOR ENHANCEMENT SCHOOLS FIRST YEAR REPORT, 1988-89 1.0 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District (LRSD) approved and adopted a plan of reorganization for the elementary schools in 1982-83. The reorganization included primary schools (K-3), intermediate schools (K, 4-6), elementary schools (K-6), and the Williams Magnet School (1-6). After the reorganization, four racially identifiable schools were created (Carver, Ish, Mitchell, and Rightsell). Since the approval of the plan in 1982, three more schools became racially identifiable (Gibbs, King, and Rockefeller). The concern for equitable educational opportunities in the racially identifiable schools in comparison to other Little Rock schools was of great importance to the Board of Directors, administrative staff, teachers, the federal judiciary and to the various publics. To ensure that a quality education was received by all and that equity existed, a program evaluation design with monitoring procedures was established in the school year of 1982-83 and implemented each year through 1986-87. The primary purpose of the evaluation design was to develop a monitoring process which would guarantee that equity in instructional programs and staffs existed in all elementary schools of the LRSD. 338 Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 2 Monitoring visits were conducted by members of the District Biracial Committee and the evaluation and testing specialists. In order to increase the effectiveness of the program evaluation, four additional evaluation and testing specialists were employed during the 1988-89 school year. In April 1988, Federal Judge Henry Woods approved a desegregation plan and ordered that major enhancements be added to the racially identifiable schools. Thereafter, these schools were referred to as major enhancement schools, rather than racially identifiable schools. Two of the major enhancement schools (King and Washington) were closed at the end of the 1987-88 school year. At the beginning of the 1988-89 school year, there were five major enhancement schools (Garland, Ish, Mitchell, Rockefeller, and Stephens) to be monitored. 2.0 ASSUMPTIONS 2.1 The teaching staffs at the major enhancement schools will have statistical data that compares favorably to the average for the other LRSD elementary school staffs in regard to the following characteristics. 2.1.1 Average years (hours/degrees) of educational preparation 2.1.2 Average years of teaching experience 339 Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 3 2.1.3 Rate of teacher absenteeism 2.1.4 Racial composition of the faculties 2.1.5 Rate of teacher turnover 2.2 The upkeep and maintenance of the major enhancement schools will receive top priority from the LRSD Maintenance Department. 2.3 More funds per pupil for instructional materials will be spent at the major enhancement schools than at the regular LRSD elementary schools. 2.4 The purchase and distribution of equipment for the major enhancement schools will occur to a greater extent than at the regular elementary schools. 2.5 The students at the major enhancement schools will receive more support services per pupil than the students at the regular elementary schools. 2.6 The major enhancement schools will possess the following characteristics of an effective elementary school. 2.6.1 Strong administrative leadership 2.6.2 High expectation of student achievement 2.6.3 Orderly school climate 2.6.4 Emphasis on basic skills of reading, writing and arithmetic 2.6.5 Flexible staff in meeting individual student needs 340 Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 4 2.6.6 student progress will be monitored 2.6.6.1 By teachers 2.6.6.2 By parents 2.6.7 Student attendance will be monitored by the principal and staff 2.7 student academic achievement in all major enhancement schools will not vary more than ten (10) national percentile points below the mean national percentile scores for the LRSD in each subject area tested at each grade level. 2.8 Parents at Garland, Ish, Mitchell, Rightsell, Rockefeller, and Stephens will respond favorably concerning the programs at their schools. 3.0 MAJOR EVALUATION QUESTIONS 3.1 Did the statistical data of the teaching staffs at the major enhancement schools compare favorably to the average of all LRSD elementary school staffs in regard to the following characteristics? 3.1.1 Average years (hours/degrees) of educational preparation 3.1.2 Average years of teaching experience 3.1.3 Rate of teacher absenteeism 3.1.4 Racial composition of the faculties 3.1.5 Rate of teacher turnover 341 Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 5 3.2 Did the upkeep and maintenance of the major enhancement schools receive top priority from the LRSD Maintenance Department? 3.3 Were more funds expended per pupil for instructional materials at the major enhancement schools than the average per-pupil expenditure at the LRSD regular elementary schools? 3.4 Were the purchase and distribution of equipment for the major enhancement schools greater than at the regular elementary schools? 3.5 Did students at the major enhancement schools receive more support services per pupil than the students at the regular elementary schools? 3.6 Did the major enhancement schools possess the following characteristics of an effective elementary school? 3.6.1 Strong administrative leadership 3.6.2 High expectation of student achievement 3.6.3 Orderly school climate 3.6.4 Emphasis on basic skills of reading, writing, and arithmetic 3.6.5 Flexible staff in meeting individual student needs 3.6.6 Was student progress monitored by the following: 3.6.6.1 teachers 3.6.6.2 parents 342 Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 6 3.6.7 Was student attendance monitored by the principal and staff? 3.7 Did student academic achievement in all major enhancement schools vary more than ten (10) national percentile points below the mean national percentile scores of the LRSD in each subject area tested at each grade level? 3.8 Did the parents at Garland, Ish, Mitchell, Rightsell, Rockefeller, and Stephens, respond favorably concerning the programs at their schools? 4.0 INSTRUMENTATION 4.1 Summary of MAT-6 test data for the 1988-89 school year 4.2 Monitoring checklist 4.3 Summary data from personnel files 4.4 Monthly budget analysis of expenditures for maintenance by school plant services 4.5 Per pupil expenditure list for each elementary school 4.6 Teacher survey 4.7 Parent survey (random sample) 4.8 School by school elementary budget expenditure list 343 Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 7 5. 0 DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Questions 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.1.3, 3.1.4, 3.1.5 Question 3.2 Questions 3.3, 3.4, 3.5 Question 3.4 Questions 3.6.4, 3.6.5, 3.6.6, 3.6.6.1, 3.6.6.2, 3.8 Question 3.6.7 Question 3.7 Questions 3.6.4, 3.6.5, 3.6.6, 3.6.6.1, 3.6.6.2, 3.8 Questions 3.6.1, 3.6.2, 3.6.3 6.0 RESULTS OF THE STUDY Summary data from personnel files Monthly budget analysis of expenditures for maintenance by school plant services School by school elementary budget expenditure list Equipment Expenditure list for each elementary school Teacher survey (random sample) District attendance records Summary of MAT-6 data for the 1988-89 school year Parent survey Monitoring checklist Each evaluation question is answered in the discussion which follows. EVALUATION QUESTION: Did the statistical data of the teaching staffs at the major enhancement schools compare favorably to the average for the other LRSD elementary school staffs in regard to the following characteristics? 6.1 This question is answered by the following sub-questions (6.1.1, 6.1.2, 6.1.3, 6.1.4 and 6.1.5) 344 Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 8 EVALUATION QUESTION: What were the average years (hours/degrees) of educational preparation for the faculty at the major enhancement schools? 6.1.1 At the major enhancement schools, 47.8% of the faculty had obtained Bachelor of Arts/Science degrees plus twelve hours or Bachelor of Arts/Science degrees plus twenty-four hours. over fifty-two (52.2) percent had obtained degrees including Bachelor of Arts/Science plus thirty hours (BA+30), Master of Science/Arts, Master of Science/Arts plus fifteen (MSE/MA+l5), and Master of Science/Arts plus thirty hours (MSE/MA+30). EVALUATION QUESTION: What were the average years of teaching experience at the major enhancement schools? 6.1.2 The average years of teaching experience at the major enhancement schools was comparable to the LRSD elementary average teacher experience (seven years). All four of the control schools exceeded the LRSD average experience with a range from 7.7 years to 18.1 years. (Table 1) EVALUATION QUESTION: Did the rate of teacher absenteeism at the major enhancement schools exceed the district average? 6.1.3 The data in Table 2 disclosed that the absentee rate at the control schools exceeded the 345 Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 9 TABLE 1 A COMPARISON OF AVERAGE YEARS OF TEACHING EXPERIENCE MAJOR ENHANCEMENT SCHOOLS TO CONTROL SCHOOLS AVERAGE YEARS ADVANCED SCHOOL OF EXPERIENCE nF.GREES MAJOR ENHANCEMENT Garland 7 46.2% Ish 10 71.4% Mitchell 8 57 .1% Rockefeller 6 53.6% Steohens 7 60% CONTROL Geyer Springs 18.1 * Otter Creek 11.0 * Terry 7.7 * Bale 13.0 * LRSD 7 52 .2% * Data not available TAhLE 2 A COMPARISON OF TEACHER ABSENCES AT THE MAJOR ENHANCEMENT AND CONTROL SCHOOLS TO THE DISTRICT AVERAGE Difference Average Number from District SCHOOL Absences (Days) Average Garland 5.8 - 6.4 Ish 13.0 + 0.8 Mitchell 9.0 - 3.2 Rockefeller 12.8 + 0.6 Stenhens 12. 7 + 0.5 CONTROL Bale 14.7 + 2.5 Geyer Springs 13.5 + 1.3 otter Creek 18.0 + 5.8 Terrv 13.3 + 1.1 LRSD AVERAGE 12.2 346 Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 10 district average. The differences from district average ranged from 1.1 days to 5.8 days. The absentee rate at two of the major enhancement schools (Garland and Mitchell) was considerably lower than the district average. At three of the major enhancement schools, the absentee rate surpassed the LRSD average. EVALUATION QUESTION: Did the racial composition of the faculty at the five major enhancement schools compare favorably to the elementary average? 6,1,4 The data in Table 3 indicates that Rockefeller was the only major enhancement school that did not compare favorably to the LRSD elementary average. TABLE 3 MAJOR ENHANCEMENT SCHOOLS RACIAL COMPOSITION OF TEACHING STAFF 1988-89 DIFFERENCE NON- DH'FERENCE R.T.l!.f'lt FROM F.OA* BT .A.CK FROM EDA* *ELEMENTARY DISTRICT AVERAGE (EDA) 33.2% 66.8% Garland 46.0% +12. 8% 54.0% - 12.8% Ish 40.9% + 7.7% 59.1% - 7.7% Mitchell 45.5% +12,3% 54.5% - 12.3% Rockefeller 27.5% - 5.7% 72.5% + 5.7% Stephens 32.0% - 1.2% 68.0% + 1.2% 347 Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 11 EVALUATION QUESTION: Did the rate of teacher turnover in the major enhancement schools exceed the district average? 6.1.5 It was reported by the Director of Human Resources that this data had not been tabulated at the time of this writing. EVALUATION QUESTION: Did the upkeep and maintenance of the major enhancement schools occur as the top priority in the LRSD maintenance department? 6.2 According to the Director of Plant Services, the upkeep and maintenance of the major enhancement schools did occur as the top priority in the LRSD during the school year 1988-89. It was reported that during the 1988-89 school year, the Plant Services Department spent a total of $696,654 in renovation contracts for the five major enhancement schools: Garland, Ish, Mitchell, Rockefeller and Stephens. The cost per school ranged from $31,872 at Rockefeller to $393,980 at Garland. Not included in those renovation costs is an additional $144,280 for roof replacement at Rockefeller, and $28,368 to air condition all classrooms at Stephens. In addition to the above, a total of 892 work orders were completed by Plant Services maintenance personnel at the five schools during the 1988-89 school year. Service requests from these schools were given high priority to insure that the level of upkeep remained high. An indication of that level of service 348 II II II Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 12 is found in comparing the number of work orders completed to the square footage of the buildings. Although these five schools comprise only 6.6% of the district's total square footage, they received 9.7% of the total work orders completed. The same special attention has been given to the cleanliness of these buildings by the two custodial managers, who have been assigned the personal responsibility of ensuring that these buildings are the \"epitome of cleanliness\" at all times. The average maintenance expenditure for the major enhancement schools was $15,275 which was $226 less than the LRSD elementary school average of $15,501. The average maintenance expenditure for the control schools was $15,622 which was slightly highe~ than the LRSD elementary school average expenditure. The average per pupil expenditure at the major enhancement schools was $59, and the average per pupil expenditure for the control schools was $40. The overall district elementary school average per pupil expenditure was $40 (Table 4). 348 Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 13 rABLE 4 MAJOR ENHANCEMENT AND CONTROL SCHOOL MAINTENANCE EXPENDITURES, 1988-89 NUMBER DIFFERENCE FROM OF TOTAL ELEMENTARY PER PUPIL SCHOOL STUDE s V RAG E NDITURES Garland 299 $ 16,576.73 +$1,074.99 $ 55.44 Ish 197 16,446.67 + 944.93 83.49 Mitchell 261 13,681.10 - 1,820.64 52.42 Rockefeller 300 14,353.36 - 1,148.38 47.84 Stephens 233 15,317.81 183.93 65.74 LRSD ELEMENTARY AV RAGE 7 MAJOR ENHANCEMENT TOTAL MAJOR ENHANCEMENT AVERAG 6.6 59.21 Bale 414 $ 19,057.90 +$3,556.16 $ 46.03 Geyer Springs 239 16,817.74 + 1,316.00 70.37 otter Creek 361 14,173.97 - 1,327.77 39.26 Terry 522 12,440.79 - 3,060.95 23.83 ----- CONTROL SCHOOL TOTAL 1 CONTROL SCHOOL AVERA + 0.86 40.68 DISTRICT ELEMENTARY TOTAL 14 179 DISTRICT ELEMENTARY AVERAG 383 7 40.47 These maintenance expenditures included expenses for repairs and maintenance of buildings, pest control, custodial supplies, upkeep of building supplies, plumbing, carpeting, electrical upkeep of building supplies, locksmiths, boilers, small engines, plaster, glass, painting, roofing, boiler license, repairs to building, upkeep of grounds, security services, equipment for upkeep of grounds, upkeep of equipment (repairs), security repairs, utilities and salaries. 350 Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 14 EVALUATION QUESTION: Were more funds expended per pupil for instructional materials at the major enhancement schools than the average per pupil expenditure at the LRSD regular elementary schools? 6.3 The average per pupil expenditures for instructional materials at the major enhancement schools in Chapter I reading are indicated in Table 5. TABLE 5 CHAPTER I READING EXPENDITURES 1988-89 PER PUPIL NUMBER OF EXPENDITURES SCHOOT TOT?.T PUPTT,C:: C::1.'l)VED CHA'P'T'ER I 1)1.'ADING Ish $ 982.58 53 $ 19 Garland 982.58 96 10 Mitchell 982.58 53 19 Rockefeller 982.58 118 8 Stephens 982.58 60 16 The Program for Accelerated Learning (PAL) mathematics budget provided $3,300 for instructional materials at each elementary school excluding Fair Park. Several schools (Baseline, Mabelvale, Watson and Chicot) were assigned two PAL teachers and received approximately $5,800. The major enhancement schools had one PAL teacher for reading and one for PAL mathematics. Chapter I funds were not expended based on the number of minority students in each school. For 351  I   Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 15 Chapter I reading, the money was expended equally among all the schools in the LRSO. For Chapter I mathematics, the money was expended at each school based on the number of PAL mathematics teachers at each school. Table 6 indicates that the school supply expenditure for the major enhancement schools exceeded the supply expenditures for the control schools. At the major enhancement schools, the average expended dollar amount ranged from $76 at Mitchell to $234 at Stephens. The control schools' average supply expenditure had a range of $39 at Geyer Springs to $51 at Bale. The overall major enhancement average was $127\nthe control school average was $48\nthe LRSO elementary school average was $52. EVALUATION QUESTION: Were the purchase and distribution of equipment at the major enhancement schools greater than at the regular elementary schools? 6.4 Detailed data on this subject, as requested, was not provided at this writing. 352 Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89  Page 16 ~ TABLE 6 MAJOR ENHANCEMENT AND CONTROL SCHOOL SUPPLY EXPENDITURES 1988-89 NUMBER OF PER PUPIL SCHOOL PU ILS EXPENDITURE Garland $ 28,007.15 299 $ 93.67 Ish 21,195.47 197 107.59 Mitchell 19,870.16 261 76.13 Rockefeller 39,578.26 300 131.93 Stephens 54,528.57 233 234.03 MAJOR ENHANCEMENT TOTAL 1 9 6.50 MAJOR ENHANCEMENT AVERAGE 9 58 126.50 Bale $ 21,114.05 414 $ 51.00 Geyer Springs 9,273.25 239 38.80 Otter Creek 17,472.59 361 48.40 Terry 25,585.52 522 49.01 CONTROL SCHOOL TOTAL 4 5. 1 47.82 CONTROL SCHOOL AVERAGE 8 361.3 384 47.82 ELEMENTARY TOTAL 14 79 LRSD ELEMENTARY AVERAG 3 52.14 353  II II II II II Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 17 EVALUATION QUESTION: Did students at the major enhancement schools receive more support services per pupil than the students at the regular elementary schools? 6.5 CARE Program According to the CARE supervisor, all five major enhancement schools participated in the CARE Program. As of May 30, 1989, six hundred ninety-one (691) children were participants in CARE on a monthly basis, thirty-nine (39) on a part-time basis, and four hundred ninety-two (492) on a drop-in basis at a total of thirty (30) sites. Twenty-five (25) of the other elementary schools were also participants in the CARE Program. The number of CARE participants per grade and per fee rate for each major enhancement school is indicated below. CARB PROGRAM NUMBER OP PARTICIPAH'l'S BY RACE PER GRADE SITE I TOTAL I BLACK/ 14 YR I ~NROLLMENT WHITEOLDS K I 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I Garland 29 29/0 0/0 5/0 4/0 8/0 3/0 6/0 0/0 3/0 Ish 27 24/3 5/1 4/0 5/1 5/1 4/0 1/0 0/0 0/0 Mitchell 24 24/0 0/0 7/0 4/0 5/0 4/0 0/0 3/0 1/0 Rockefeller 43 38/5 0/0 9/0 10/3 12/1 3/0 2/0 1/1 1/0 Ste en 8 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 TOTAL 152 143/9 13/2 31/0 28/4 33/2 16/0 11/0 4/1 7/0 NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS BY RACE PER FEE RATE I TOTAL BLACK/ FREE STAFF SITE ENROLLMENT WHITE RATE AM PM Garland 29 29/0 26/0 0/0 0/0 3/0 2/1 1/2 Ish 27 24/3 19/3 1/0 0/0 3/0 3/0 1/2 Mitchell 24 24/0 21/0 3/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 1/2 Rockefeller 43 38/5 29/5 2/0 1/0 6/0 4/2 1/3 Ste s 29 8 0 0 0 0 1 3 TOTAL 152 143/9 121/9 7/0 1/0 13/0 9/4 5/12 354 I I I  I Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 18 6.5.1 Library Holdings and Expenditures The data suggested that the mean per pupil library holdings for 1988-89, at the five major enhancement schools, was 28.3 which was significantly higher than the LRSD elementary mean of 19.8 and that of the control schools which was 18.5. The mean elementary library expenditures for the major enhancement schools was $17, and the mean elemen~ary library expenditure for the control schools was $10. The average elementary library expenditure for schools that were neither major enhancement nor control schools was $14. This data indicated that the expenditures for the major enhancement schools exceeded the average for the control schools and the other elementary schools. Arkansas State and North Central Association standards require ten (10) books per student. The supervisor of Instructional Technology reported that the numbers provided did not include Baseline Elementary School. He also indicated that book totals are slightly down because of a district-wide directive to discard outdated holdings. However, the average per pupil expenditure does include supplemental Chapter 2 funds, but does not generally include   Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 19 desegregation funds expended on district schools. 6.5.2 Volunteers in Public Schools 6.5.3 According to the VIPS coordinator the volunteer hours served at the major enhancement schools ranged from eighty two (82) to over nine hundred thirty (934.55). The volunteer hours at Garland were 469.7, Ish 819.50, Mitchell 82.0, Rockefeller 257.95, and Stephens 934.55. There was a total of 2,563.7 hours served within those schools during the 1988-89 school year, with a mean of 512.74 hours. In the other elementary schools, there was a total of 37,852.37 volunteer hours served for an average of 1,261.75 hours. Pupil Services Data provided by the Pupil Services Director indicated that all major enhancement schools were assigned a full-time counselor. In addition, Stephens Elementary School was assigned a full-time social worker. Two of tt.e control schools were assigned full-time counselors because of the student enrollment (Terry 522, Bale 414). The remaining control schools, Otter Creek and Geyer Springs, shared a counselor with another elementary school. In 356  Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 20 the major enhancement schools, there was a total of 1,290 students. The counselor/student ratio at the major enhancement schools was 1/258. The counselor/student ratio at the four control schools was 1/384. The overall LRSD elementary average counselor/student ratio was 1/396. 6.5.4 Special Education In the major enhancement schools, there were one hundred thirty-eight (138) students identified and assigned to the Special Education Program, including resource, self-contained, and speech therapy. Thirty-seven (37) of those students were assigned to self-contained classes, sixty-four {64) to resource and thirty-seven (37) to speech. The self-contained classes at Garland and Stephens provided Community Based Instruction (CBI) for students with moderate to severe disabilities. There was a total of 13.5 teachers providing special services within the major enhancement schools, with Garland having the highest number of students being served, and Ish and Stephens with the lowest number. The four control schools provided Special Education services for a total of one hundred 357 Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 21 four (104) students. Seventeen (17) of those students were in self-contained classes, twenty-seven (27) were in speech therapy, and sixty {60) were in resource classes. Eight (8) teachers served the students assigned to the program. 6.5.5 Gifted Programs Gifted programming during the 1988-89 school year for the major enhancement schools occurred through the subject areas of language arts, mathematics and science. Because of a lack of sufficient staff, all subject areas and grades were not operational at all schools. Gifted programming during the 1988-89 school year for the control schools occurred through the subject areas of mathematics, science, reading, and language arts. Programming for all subject areas in each school did not occur due to a lack of staff for each grade level. Two of the four schools had one gifted area at each grade level. The subject areas, grades and number of students served at each school are indicated in Table 7. 358  Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 22 TABLE 7 MAJOR ENHANCEMENT AND CONTROL SCHOOLS GIFTED PROGRAM REPORT 1988-89 GRADE BT CK WH r'T'E SCHOOL LEVELfS) SUBJECT(S) M F M F Garland 1-4 Math 12 19 4 2 Ish 1-3, 6 Lang. Arts Science 18 22 1 1 Mitchell 1-3, 6 Lang. Arts Science 21 25 4 0 Rockefeller 3 Lang. Arts 3 7 2 1 Stephens 3-4 Lang. Arts 9 5 1 3 -- -- -- -- MAJOR ENHANCEMENT TOTAL 63 78 12 7 -- -- -- -- Otter Math Creek 3-4 Lang. Arts Science 13 18 7 13 Geyer Reading Springs 2-3 Math 5-6 Science 11 21 9 15 Terry 2-6 Lang. Arts Science English 31 44 34 36 Bale 1-6 Lang. Arts 24 30 19 15 -- -- -- -- CONTROL SCHOOL TOTAL 79 113 69 79 358 OTHER M F TOTAL 0 0 37 ' i 0 0 42 0 0 50 0 0 13 0 1 19 -- -- I 0 1 161 I -- -- 3 0 54 0 0 56 0 2 147 1 0 89 -- -- 4 2 346  Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 23 EVALUATION QUESTION: Were the characteristics of an effective elementary school evident at the major enhancement schools in regard to the following? 6.6 This question is answered by the following seven sub-questions. Refer to Table 9 for the compilation of the monitoring checklist items, and Tables 10 and 11 for results of teacher and parent surveys. (6.6.1, 6.6.2, 6.6.3, 6.6.4, 6.6.5, 6.6.6, and 6.6.7) EVALUATION QUESTION: Was strong administrative leadership recognizable at Garland, Ish, Mitchell, Rockefeller, and Stephens? 6.6.1 Teacher survey results from the major enhancement schools (eighty-three percent) and control schools (eighty-eight percent) revealed that effective instructional leadership existed at their schools (Table 10, Item 3). An analysis of the monitoring checklist summary indicated that ninety-one (91) percent of the teacher responses were positive that effective leadership existed at all of the major enhancement schools. (Table 9, Item EC 27) EVALUATION QUESTION: Was there a climate of high expectations for student achievement at the major enhancement schools? 6.6.2 Conclusive data from the major enhancement monitoring visits disclosed ninety-eight (98) percent of the monitored staff felt that the total atmosphere reflected high expectations for 360  I  I I Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 24 all students (Table 9, Item LE63}. The majority of the surveyed teacher respondents at the major enhancement schools {89%) and the four control schools {92%} expressed that there was an atmosphere of high expectation for student academic development {Table 10, Item 6). Parents {91%) from the major enhancement schools and parents {85%) from the control schools responded favorably to this item {Table 11, Item 12). EVALUATION QUESTION: Was there an orderly school climate manifested at the major enhancement schools? 6.6.3 At the major enhancement schools, ninety-six {96) percent of the monitored staff members indicated that the school climate was safe and orderly {Table 9, Item EC 30). Most of the surveyed teachers at the five major enhancement schools (86%) were in agreement with the monitoring results {Table 10, Items 1 and 2). Parents surveyed at the major enhancement schools {89%) and the control schools (88%) responded that a safe and orderly school climate was observable at those schools (Table 11, Items 1 and 2). 361  Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 25 EVALUATION QUESTION\nWas there an emphasis on the basic skills of reading, writing, and mathematics at Garland, Ish, Mitchell, Rockefeller, and Stephens? 6.6.4 Ninety-six (96) percent of the teacher respondents at the major enhancement schools and one hundred (100) percent at the four control schools indicated that there was a strong emphasis placed on the basic skills of reading, writing, and mathematics (Table 10, Item 20). Most of the parent respondents at the major enhancement schools (83%) and parents from the four control schools (91%) agreed with the teachers' assessment of the emphasis on basic skills at their schools (Table 11, Item 14). A summary of the monitoring visits at the major enhancement schools revealed that ninety-seven (97) percent of the assessed teachers agreed that emphasis on the mastery of basic skills took precedence over all other school activities (Table 9, Item SM 57). EVALUATION QUESTION: Were the staffs flexible in meeting individual student needs? 6,6.5 The majority of the teachers at Garland, Ish, Mitchell, Rockefeller, and Stephens Schools (96%) and the four control schools (90%) responded that the school staffs were flexible 362 Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 26 in meeting individual student needs (Table 10, Item 21). EVALUATION QUESTION: Was student progress monitored? 6.6.6 This question is answered by the following sub-questions (6.6.6.1, and 6.6.6.2). EVALUATION QUESTION: Was student progress monitored by teachers? 6.6.6.1 Teacher survey results at the five major enhancement schools (99%) and control schools (98%) showed that student progress was monitored often and very carefully by certified staff members (Table 10, Item 23). EVALUATION QUESTION: Was student progress monitored by parents? 6.6.6.2 At the major enhancement schools, the majority of the parents (89%) and control school parents (90%) indicated that they did monitor their children's progress closely (Table 11, Item 16). EVALUATION QUESTION: Did the principal/staff monitor pupil attendance? 6.6.7 Analytical and comparative data from the major enhancement and control schools indicated that pupil attendance was monitored and records maintained. The data in Table a shows the percentages of pupil attendance for the major 363 II Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 27 enhancement schools and control schools for 1988-89. TABLE 8 MAJOR ENHANCEMENT AND CONTROL SCHOOLS PERCENTAGE OF PUPIL ATTENDANCE 1988-89 SCHOOL PERCENTAGE OF PUPIL ATTENDANCE MAJOR ENHANCEMENT: Garland Ish Mitchell Rockefeller Stephens CONTROL: Bale 95.7% 98.6% 95.0% 96.0% 96.0% Geyer Springs Otter Creek Terry 94.0% 93.0% 95.0% 96.0% LRSD TOTAL 93.9% EVAWATION QUESTION: Did student academic achievement in all major enhancement schools vary less than ten (10) national percentile points below the mean national percentile scores of the LRSD in each subject area tested at each grade level? 6.6.8 Mitchell students in grade 2, Rockefeller students in grades 5 and 6, and Ish students in grades 2, 3, and 6, exceeded the LRSD mean by several points. Student academic achievement at Garland and Stephens Elementary Schools was 364     Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 28 considerably below the LRSD mean achievement at most grade levels. EVALUATION QUESTION: Did the parents at Garland, Ish, Mitchell, Rockefeller, and Stephens respond favorably concerning the programs at their schools? 6.6.9 Survey data from the major enhancement schools (86%) and control schools (92%) indicated that parents supported and participated in school programs (Table 11, Item 4). The data also revealed that eighty-six (86) percent of the parents at the control schools and eighty-nine (89) percent of the parents at the major enhancement schools were satisfied with the programs at their schools (Table 11, Item 19). 6.6.10 summary of Other Findings Each of the three survey instruments included items which provided additional information about the major enhancement schools. The following is a partial summary of the information obtained (Tables 9, 10, and 11). 6.6.10,1 Most of the teacher respondents at the five major enhancement schools (75%) and control schools (94%) indicated that standardized tests were used to diagnose and prescribe student needs (Table 10, Item 17). 365 I I I I I I I Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 29 6.6.10.2 Eighty-five (85) percent of the teachers at Garland, Ish, Mitchell, Rockefeller, and Stephens and eighty-four (84) percent of the teachers at the control schools expressed through the survey instrument that sufficient equipment and materials were provided to effectively implement the total instructional program (Table 10, Item 7). 6.6.10.3 At the major enhancement schools, seventy-eight (78) percent of the teachers and eighty (80) percent of the teachers at the control schools felt that the extracurricular program was designed to guarantee involvement of minority students (Table 10, Item 14). 6.11 summary A careful analysis of the survey results and monitoring reports disclosed that the five major enhancement schools had programs that were equal to programs within the other LRSD elementary schools. This data further revealed that extra human resources and energies were expended in those schools so that 366 ll II ll II II Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 30 each school designated as a major enhancement school would have \"major enhancements\" within those schools. The collective data indicated that continued extra effort will be needed at those schools during the 1989-90 school year to successfully meet the individual needs of the students. 6.12 Recommendations: As the data suggested, the major enhancement school concept was successful to a degree. However, it is felt that some modifications in the major enhancement schools should be made. The following recommendations are based on the findings of this study and research based on effective inner city schools and are presented for consideration. It is recommended that: * A higher percentage of staff members at the major enhancement schools utilize standardized test results as well as other criteria to diagnose, prescribe and address student needs.  Appropriate staff development be provided at each major enhancement school to suggest methods and resources for meeting the needs of the inner city student. * Individual Educational Plans (IEP's) be written for students that are identified as being at-risk. 367 Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 31 * Each teacher, in cooperation with the principal, select a proven (research based) instructional  model to deliver curriculum content. * The principal should develop an on-site teacher intervention team to assist with student academic and behavioral problems. The primary function of this committee would be to review student academic progress, and design strategies to meet individual student needs, thus eliminating or reducing the possibility of student academic failure. * A staff committee be organized to study the prescribed curriculum for continuity and teachability to ensure that it addresses the needs of each student. This curriculum should be broadbased to provide a variety of approaches and strategies for the learner. * Teachers at the major enhancement schools should be given the opportunity to plan and participate in appropriate staff development. * Consideration should be given to providing time at faculty meetings for effective teachers to share concepts that have been successful. * Training sessions be held for parents to suggest ways for them to help their children cope with difficulties at school. 368   Major Enhancement Schools First Year Report, 1988-89 Page 32 * The staff make every effort to create and maintain a positive climate . * The goals of the major enhancement schools should be articulated to the staff, students and community. * Funds that are allocated for Chapter I programs be distributed to schools according to students' needs. 369 TABLE 9 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT EVALUATION AHO TESTING DEPARTMENT MAJOR ENHANCEMENT/QUALITY CONTROL MONITORING CHECKLIST SUMMARY 1911-19 HUMBER OF SCHOOL VISITS: ll KEY: HA - Not Applicable/No Response A Observed NUIIBER OF CLASSROOM VISITS: \"-i B  Not Observed C  No Opinion Questions BG 1 through OS 10 were answered only once for each school visit. Questions G 11 through RB 91 were answered for each classroom visited. ACTIVITY ll.YILDJNG 1,ND GROUNDS CBC) BG l The tallowing areas are clean and free from trash: dumpster (trash pick-up) area: playground areas\nparking lot\nyard/courtyard. BG 2 A schedule is established and followed for custodial staff to maintain the school grounds including proper trimming ot grass and shrubs . REVIEW A II C )\\ I 61\\ J6\\ - '-- 61 70\\ e_G_ J _ P_l_a_y_g_r_o_u_n_d_ _q_u_i_p_m__n_t_i_s__. \"_p_p_r_o_-______ 15\\ 1_84\\ l _ ll\\ priate tor age groups\nsutticient I_ __ (dnount)\nwell-maintained. - n~. ___\"_ a_l_l_~_a_y_s_a_r_e_,_ _c __l e_a n_\n_c_o_l_o_r_!_u_l\n______ ,_l\\1 _ 84\\ 1_ 14\\ well-lighted\nfree from I_ __ obstructions. ME/QC CHECKLIST SIDIMARY 1988-89 SCHOOL YEAR PAGE 2 BG 5 ACTIVITY Restrooms are: clean (floor , corner\u0026amp;,  irrora, baaina, toilets, windows)\ntree troa odor: functional (toilets, basins): properly supplled (tissue, paper towels, soap). NA A II 6J\\ J4\\ - BG--6--C-l_a_s_s_r_ooms_a_r_e_, __ '_u_nc_t _i_o_n_a_l_\n_________ l _ _ l _\\ _ I -88-\\ I __ I I\\ . cloan\nattractive\ncomfortable temperature . BG 7 The building ia: in good repair\nrequests for repairs are c011pleted within a reasonable period ot time. BG 8 The cafeteria is: neati clean (table5, floor, serving ared)\nattractively arranged. Q..E.tll'L~~- os 9 Office st~ff exhibits a positive attiturte and is courteous and efficient when dealing with : students\nteacher\npatrons: others. I~~ 1_: _ 1__ 2 :: )\\ 9 5 \\ os 10 Office area is: colorful\nc lean I 1\\ I 88\\ I O\\ I (not dusty)\nattractive\nof I ____ \"_dequ~~c !\nize. ______________ !'.il\nt!IBhk..lfil. G 11 Teacher is aware of monitoring activities and has seen a copy of the checklist. c . I\\ I \\ I l,J w NE/QC CHECKLIST SUKMARY 1988-89 SCHOOL YEAR PAGE 3 ACTIVITY G 12 Start members are taailiar with and have access to the LRSD desegregation plan. ----------------------- REVIEW A  I! c 1_1_:_1_1~1- _ G_l_J_ _P _r_i n c_i_p_a_l_/_t_e_a_c_h_e_r_s_a_t_t_e_m_p_t_t__o ______ , ___ , _OO l\\ , _--, __ address the needs ot educationally disadvantaged students. G 14 Racial composition of start complies with desegregation requirements. -------------------------- G 15 Teacher demonstrates a commitment to the major enhancement program. -------------------------- G 16 Major enhancement school receives high priority treatment as evidenced by special allocation ot resource  to support program. G 17 A computer is available in the classroom for use by the students. -------------------------- G 18 Students uae a computer at least once each week. -------------------------- G 19 School participateG Jn Partners in Education program. ----------------------- !UJUA CENTERS IHCI MC 20 School start members have the opportunity to suggest materials to be pur~hased for the media center. (..J \"'1 i,-. 1_:_1_:_1_3\\ I_~ 1_: 1_: _ 1 _3\\ 1_: 12\\ 841 3\\ 1_1_35 \\ 1_6:_1_ 1_:_1 _6_ 21 1_]7\\ I_ 1_: _I_:_ I_ _:_1 ~~ 97\\ 2\\ l\\  HE/QC CHECKLIST SUMMARY 1980-89 SCHOOL YEAR PAGE 4 MC 21 HC 22 MC 23 MC 24 :-!C 25 HC 26 ACTIVITY Books, materials, resources, and media available in the media center reflect racial and ethnic diversity. Positive racial and ethnic images and concepts are reflected in materials in the media center. Staft memberu carefully preview, review, and update instructional media to guarantee the elimination ot cultural bias . The media center staff members provide broadening and enriching experiences for the students. The Pulaski County Special School District media center ~odcl is being uGed in grades four through six with planned instructional units taught by the librarian (at selected pilot site ). The media center instructional units taught by the librarian are an outgrowth ot reading instruction provided by the classroom teacher. EffECTIVENESS CHARACTERISTIC~ EC 27 The principal is a strong instructional leader and a viable resource to staff. ------------------------- ~ II TABLE 9 (continued) _____ JJ_f,.ru\niC~ -- - l!A_ _ . _ _J,__' - _n_ C. 95\\ ]\\ l\\ --- --- I 98\\ 1\\ 1' __ _I __ I\\ 80\\ I\\ ', I 95\\ I I 1 5 \\ l\\ I a2, ---' -- - - 9\\ I 7\\ I I _ i _ , -- 1_:_1 I \\ ) \\ I w ~ I ii Ii Ii ii II  /QC CHECKLIST SUMMARY J88-89 SCHOOL YEAR 'IGE 5 _____ .,cR,.._EV.,il\nh'. _ ___ _ ____ _nA~CT.u.JzV~I~T~X----------------~N~A.._ ___ A..___--\"B .___:______i\n__ : 28 School staff melDbers understand goals of the LRSD and the achool. I I 991 I 11 I ------------------------- --- ---- ---- : 29 Teachers clearly exhibit through their interactions with students the belief that all students can learn .. : 30 School climate is safe and orderly. ------------------------- = ll students with outstanding academic success are recognized. -------------------------- = 32 Students have homework assignments, parental involvement, teacher check-in, and immediate feedback . c 33 Each employee is evaluated at least once during the school year through the use of an approved evaluation instrument . C 34 The basis for the employee evaluation is the accomplishment of specific goals and individual s overall .performance. C 35 Specific goals used in the evaluation are mentioned as a requirement from a previous evaluation. 981 H I -- 1_:_1_3 ~'- H 1-- 1_:_~1__:_1 5\\ 92\\ 2\\ 1\\ 99\\ 1\\ 991 l\\ H 97' 2\\ ME/QC CHECKLIST SUMMARY 1988-89 SCHOOL YEAR PAGE 6 TABLE 9 (continued) ____ _ Jlli.\\!.U:.iL..:=..:_=-- _ _ _ ___ _,:A.,,CT..,..,IuYuiuTuXL-----------------\"NaA _ __a__: __ lL ..:__. . EC 36 Each certified employee will complete at least 27 hours ot staff development during the school year. PARENT PARTICIPATION CPPl PP 37 Parents are directly involved in their child's education\nfor example, parents help plan student schedules and academic pursuits. PP 38 The school has strategies to increase parental involvement in school and in home supported educational activities. PP 39 Te acher has partic ipa t ed In a s t a ff development program t o l e arn methods of e liciting support and involvement of parents . PP 40 A home based reinforcement program for students with chronic academic or behavioral problems has been e stablished. PP 41 Training s essions h ave been held for parents to teach them how to help their children c ope with difficulties at school . PP 42 A PTA parent birac lal committee is established and a c t i ve. 99\\ 1 \\ 78 \\ 21\\ I \\ 92\\ 6 \\ 2 \\ 2 ot. 44\\ n --- ----'--- --- 35\\ I 6 \\ I __ _ 50\\ 27\\ I I ij 2\\ I 8 \\ I I 0\\ --------- --- ----- --- ---- I w u, I IE/QC CHECKLIST SIJIIKARY .988-89 SCHOOL YEAR \u0026gt;AGE 7 ii REVIEW ____ __.AwCT.....,ILY~I~T~L----------------='-----LL----'\"---~~ P 43 Parent viaitationa to 1:1le I I 981 I 1\\ I U ____ \"_c_h_o_o_l__r_e__c_h__d_u_l__d_.___________ ___ __ _ __ p 44 Principal auppliea into.,..tion I I 981 I I about the school and co.,.unity __to-p ar_ent_vo_lun_te_er__ ____ _ 2\\ \u0026gt;p 45 A parent advisory group is established and active. 1~1_:_1 81 I __ :_ - \u0026gt;P_4_6 _A_ p__r_e_n_t_r_e_c_ru_i_t___n_t_c__o_ i_ t_t_e_e_ _____ I ___ I _641 I _7\\l I __ 3 7\\ is established to recruit new patrons and students. \u0026gt;_P _4_7 _P_ a_r_e_n_t_s__r__ _e_ d_u_c_a_t_e_d__b_o_u_t_t_h_e_ _____ I -- I _88 1, ___ 4 _'_ I _ LRSD desegregation plan. 8\\ \u0026gt;p 48 Parents actively participate through school improvement teams in the development and delivery of quality desegregated educational progrll9S. 58\\ 16\\ 26\\ -------------------------- --- --- --- --- pp 49 VIPS are ettective in ... 1ating the start eabera in each  chool. I I 97\\ I 1, I 1, -------------------------- --- --- ---- --- PP 50 Staff development programs arc utilized to provide parents with strategies and guidance tor working with their children at home. PP 51 Parents are provided training to help their children cope with difficulties at school and to reinforce behavioral expectations and academic learning at home. 441 5\\ 19\\ 36\\ J\\ 521 35\\ 8\\ ii ii ii     HE/QC CHECRLIST SUMMARY 1988-89 SCHOOL YEAR PAGE 8 IICTIYITX DISTRICT GOALS IDGI TABLE 9 (continued) DG 5-2--S-c_h_o_o_l_a-t-a-t_t__eab_er_s_w_e_r.e _ _ _ ______ l __ I __ 99- \\ - , 1 ____l_\\ _ , ___ involved in the development or school goals and building plan. program is to involve all DG 53 The goal ot the co-curricular 12\\ I 9H I -1\\ , students_. ____________ _ _ _______ I_ __ I - __ ------ is generally refl.,cted in DG 54 Racial comi)osition of the school 14\\ I 90\\ t.,\\ I ____c_ o_-_c_u_r_r_i_c_u_1_a_r__c_t_1_v_i_t_i_e_s_.____ _____ __I __ DG 55 An auditable program is established for awareness and recruitment of students to participate in co-curricular activities. H 77\\ l6\\ HI 11, 7\\ DG 56 Goals have been formed to decrease the disparity in academic performances between the races. __ ! __ SKILLS MASTERY ISM) SH 57 There is a strong emphasis to ensure that ninety (90) percent of the students will master the basic skills. (Arkansas Minimum Pe rformance Test (HPT) and teacher-made tests.) SM se Remediation programs aro available for those students who do not meet the required level of mastery in all s ubjects. )4\\ 97\\ 1\\ 1 t 45\\ I w ' HE/QC CHECKLIST SUMMARY 1988-89 SCHOOL YEAR PAGE 9 ACTIVITY SH 59 Student who have attained only partial aa tery are enabled to pur ue other learning to increase aotivation to learn the ba  ic ckill . ~PECIALIZEP PROGRAMS CSP) REVIEW NA A  B c 991 lt SP 60 The gifted prograa has been I 2\\ I 60\\ I 31\\ I 7\\ structured to offset previous ____s_ e_g_r_eg_a_t_i_v_e_e_r_re_c_t_s_. ____________ --- SP 61 Black tudents are not as igned disproportionately to pecial education classes. ------------------------- SP 62 Special prograas (e.g. telephone hotlines, hoaework center, extended day, extended year, sucuaer programs, and special tutoring) are provided to identified students with 127\\ I 6lt I 51 I 7\\ St 70\\ 24\\ lt ____ a_c_a_d_e_11_i_c_d_i_f_f_i_c_u_1_t_ie_s_. _________ j _____________ i,Et,RtllNG ENVIRONMENT (LEI LE 63 The total school ataosphere reflects high expectation for intellectual developaent and responsible citizenship. LE 64 Positive reinforcement of desired student behavior is practiced (praise successful experiences.) LE 65 Positive interaction ls occurring ~ithin the building. ,J A u 1\\ 99\\ l \\ It -----   HE/QC CHECKLIST SUMMARY 1988-89 SCHOOL YEAR PAGE 10 TABLE 9 (continued) REV!t'W ______A ..,,.c.:r. 1... ,yl.,II,..TuY.__ _______________~ NaA~--~A~--~B~_ __\u0026lt;\n_ __ I 851 LE 66 Teachere have euCticient 151 11ate,lale and equip nt tor l plementation of the instructional program. ___ , _ _ - - --- LE 67 Teacher/pupil ratio does not exceed specified limits. (l/20) I )\\ I 79\\ I 18\\ I - __ , ____ --- Q.lliQM!.~NSELING (GC) GC 68 A comprehensive progra  of student diagnosis and prescription has been enacted. CC 69 At risk students have been ident i fled. cc 70 Test data have been used to I 90\\ J\\ 1 plan and prescribe programs I tor students. I I I -------------- -- I ___ - -- - 7\\ GC 71 The counselor has helped decrease incidences ot student academic failure. --------------------------,~1__:~1-)\\ !~:- GC 72 The counselor has helped lower pupil drop-out rates. GC 73 Extensive services in quidance, counseling, and social work are provided to identity and address the needs ot all students.  -'~~~'--l~J_:_1 --3- \\ i 92 \\ I -------------------------- - ___ ! ___ _ I w -....J I HE/QC CHECKLIST SUMMAJlY 1988-89 SCHOOL YEAR PAGE 11 ACTIVITY ADVANCEMENT POLICIES (APl AP 74 There is a pertoraance-baaed promotion policy. ----- --------------------- AP 75 Expectations tor student learning are clear. -------- ------- ----------- AP 76 Parents, students, and teachers know what tho pro11\u0026lt;\u0026gt;tion policy is. -------------------------- AP 77 Social pro1110tions are discouraged. ------------------ -------- STUDENT DATA (SDI SD 78 The student record syste  is capable of generating current and complete data by child, by class, by school, by race, SD 79 and by sex. current and coplete student records are aintained in the classroo and school to 110nitor the progress in achieveent of the individual learner including Academic Skills Development Plans for students who failed any s11bjei:t ~r~-:\\ 0! tl'\\e '1P'T . REVIEW NA A B c 1_1_:_1_11 l_l\\ 1-- 1-=-1_ _ 1 1_:__ 1~ 1-l\\I _ 1 _ 1 _:_ 1_ _: 1 33\\ I 14\\ 50\\ )\\ _I __ l\\ 81\\ 17' 1\\ ----------- - ------------ - - - --- --- --- - - - - HE/QC CHECKLIST SUMXARY 1988-89 SCHOOL YEAR PAGE 12 ACTIVITY SD 80 The result (levels or aaetery) fro achievement teats,  ini IDI perfonaance teats, and reading and athe atic inventoriaa are stored in the student record system and used by school  tatf to monitor student achievement, and identify stude nt need and s kills D1a s tery . SD 81 Standardized test data are used to appraise the effectiveness of educational progra- and i nterpret school and di trict successes and needs to the comraunity. SD 82 The foll owi ng staff are provided immedi ate access to i nformation regarding the i nstruct i ona l program and student data : teac he r s\nc oun~clors : p r i nc ipal LJ\ncentral office adainistrators. '.llliE.....Qll TA st\u0026lt; C TT l TT 8J Sutficient time on task enables ninety percent or the students to master the basic curriculum. TABLE 9 (continued) i _ _ _ ___R.~EiVL!u~W,,_ _ _ _ _ NA A B c )6\\ 15\\ 48\\ 1\\ __ J_ -- ' H 96 \\ ))\\ I 12, I I i ___ _ I __ _! _:J _1_9~ - TT--0-4 __ \"_e_dd i_n_g_ a_n_d_ '\" \"t _h_e_ma_~_i_c_s _______ ___ l ___ I _l_OO \\ int e rvent i on programs hdvc bee n I e s t a blis hed at the s chool . 11' 8 5 Trdined paraprofessionals provid~ clas sroom assistance to students who are not reaching nine ty (90) perc ent ma ste ry . ))\\ I I J \\ --- - _I_ --- w' (..() I ME/QC CHECKLIST SUMMARY 1988-89 SCHOOL YEAR PAGE lJ ACTIVITY TT 86 student ar goal oriented and reaain on taak. REVIEW NA A  B c I I 911 I 71 I -------------------------- --- ---- ---- ---- RACIAL BALANCE (RBI RB 87 Student are not re-segregated within a racially  ixed school and/or classroom. -------------------------- RB 88 The curricular focus !or black students is not di!terent !rom the curricular tocua !or non-black students. I 121 I 84\\ I 4\\ I __ 5\\ 95\\ -------------------------- --- ---- ---- ---- _ R_8_8_9_ _H _e_t__r__og_ e_ n_e_o_u__g_r_o_u_p_i_n_g_i__t_h__ ______ l ___ l_98\\ 1_ __2_ ,_ 1_--__ primary practice or organizing students !or learning. - R_D_9_0_ _E _x_t_r_a_e_n_c_o_u_r_a_g_e_m__n__t _i_ s_g_i_v__n_t_o _____ l_l0\\ 1_65\\ , 1 black students to participate _24\\ l _,_ , _ in co-curricular activities. - R_B_9_l_ _S _c_h_o_o_l_p_r_og_r_a_m___r__e _d_ _s_i_g_n__d_t__o _____ l_7\\ 1_93\\ 1_--1_--_ ensure involveent ot minority students. TABLE 9 (continued) I w I.O 1 9 8 8 - R q  ._.,,  rn QUSS1'JON Al\"\"' D/\u0026lt;:n INn/ND r .. na 7 0 1 19 1 . 8cbool ollaaU la aafe. 88% 0% 1n 95:t .. 3 2 3 18 Bcbool cu .. u 1 orderly. ,o., ?r:: 38:t an .. \u0026gt;. h\"t.ncl ..1 1 an tt.at:iv tnat:nactloaal a-. 7 1 0 15 AA'!'. 11% o:r. .,~., .. O.t.ataU. . eca,4-.lo atud.nt.e are ~ - 8,n n., 0 0 20 01: M inn .. .. 8 0 0 20 o..atat.a.tla9 citia.nalt.ip et\\adnU ar. IIVl\" Ot M inn,- .. 5 2.,r\n., 1 n ~ 1890'.t A~ refl~ bigh eapectatlona tor devalo~t . ~,., ,. T. .c har9 llaa aufflclnt: .. trll and e,czvJ....,.at . 5 3 0 17 631. 1A'I: m R'i'l .. Maeda at' ault:1-rc1l and ault.1-.t.hnlc ~ ar. ..t . 4 3 1 19 c\nn.,, ,o .. p., a\u0026lt;: .. .-.reait,/cttlaen pa:-tlc1p,1t.1on rad  upport. u  av1dent. . 338'.t 5 63% 0 0l 1365'J. 8 0 0 [US lo. VIN U-. affective lh ..,.IA,t.i.ftv 0e ftatt. 100% o,: o 90:t 7 0 1 6 11. Pro9r ... aY llabl to t.-cb p ra.nt.  to help cblldran AA.: 0% 13'. in, u . Stu:i nt.a r.c-i\"' 9u1dnca/couna11~ ar,tce, . 7 1 0 17 \"\"\"' l'l'l' fll 85'.I: 6 1,\ny, ll . Stu-:t.ant racont. o int. ined and ued ror ..:,nit.ortn,g. 0 2 19 0% 25' ac\n ... 5 0 3 15 Ertcaeurricular proqr involw alnorit.y ft.lldent.  . 63')\n0% 38% 751 8 0 0 15 !':. . A.\n.,propriat.o ins  rvic v conduct.ad. 100% 0% 01, 7i\nw !6 . R~ived MAT-, aonlt.orlnq ch~tUt. prior !.o teat . 7 0 l 18 oo .. O'! 13'% 901. ll , Uee,d etanda..nUaed teat dU to ldent.Uy ~ ...... 5 0 3 17 63% 0% 38:t as, 8 0 0 19 11, Wa  ev luat.acl by  upervi or t 1 ..  t ~- 100'.( 0% Ol 951 \" . Coiapleted t lt. 27 hour of et  tt devalop:aent. . 8 0 0 20 '\"\"'( n:' o,: 1007 , . There 1   t.roniijl pb. l  on ba  ic: klll   1oor. om: o or. 19 nc JI. St.tt h fllbl and vllUng to t:ry ~ proqir .... 7 0 l 20 DO n '! 131. ,nn, 3 3 38% 2 25'.t \"  P rnt  rpond favorably t.o proqT .... 13 38o/. ,\nc\ni .,. 8 u u 20 r aonitor t.h pcoqr or ay atudent.  clo  ly . 1001 0,,,. 0% 100: ... Appa  renc or building  nd ground  1 tl  ractory . 7 0 I 19 QQ \u0026gt; n 1 13~. 95, \" Ott lee atrt h poeltlv ett.ltud and ta courtaou  . 7 0 1 20 RR o.-: 13'!, 100, ..,.._, TABLE 10 MAJOR ENHANCEMENT SURVEY TEACHERS, 1988-89 KEY: A/SA O/SD NO/NR = AGREE/STRONGLY AGREE DISAGREE/STRONGLY DISAGREE NO OPINION/NO RESPONSE M \" J O R E N fl A N C M F. N .,. C: ,.. H n O T s H.E. SCHOOLS Tc,U M TCHELL ROCKEF'ELLER In,.,, NO/NR IA/SA D/SO NO/NR A/SA O/C:Ot\"'n'NR 1 0 16 0 u II 0 0 5% 0% 100: 0'.t O:t 100:t O:t o,\n2 0 lb u u 15 0 2 In'!'. M 100: 0:t 0% 88:t Ot 12% 3 ,.,., 2 16 0 0 12 3 2 10,: lOOl m 0:t 711, IR'I' l?'l'. 0 0 15 l 0 16 l 0 0'1'. O'I QU .....6.l n-. 94% 61, O't 0 0 16 0 0 16 I 0 O'l 0~ inn m 0'1: 94% 6% oi 0 2 16 OM 0 14 1 2 0:t l0't 11\\ne n, Q?q, ~, 1?~ 2 1 13 3 0 17 0 0 10% 5:Z 811 191 O'l'. 1nnq, _oz... n v 0 1 14 0 z 11 3 3 n'l' .,.,, 881 02 131 f,\u0026lt;\n'I'. lR'I: Hl 'l' 3isi 4 20% 11 2 3 !\u0026gt; 11 1 f,Q \"! 11,: IQ% 29,\n651, 6',\nu '(. 16 0 0 9 4 4 0% 10% 1nf\"l'! 0 '1:1 n 53% 24% 244 7 7 11 69% l 6tl 4 25% 3 9 5 35% 35:Z 18)\n53,\n29\n: 2 1 lb u 0'.ll u 13 3 1 101. 5\n: 100:t 0% 76!, lB'l 6% 0 1 16 0 : 0 16 0 l M \u0026lt;\n'i. 100'!: OIi or. 94'!. O't 6i 0 5 16 0 I 0 11- -o-- -6 0% 25% 10() / Qo/: Ot 65X O'l 357. 1 4 15 0 l 14 0 3 5'! 20% Qd9 n'! f, '/. R7'!' OJ I8~ 0 2 12 75~ 0 4 15 0 2 0% lO'k 0% 25:t RA. '~ Ol I 2~ 1 2 13 0 3 12 3 2 5'.I: 10'.I: 811. 0% 19% 71,: lR'Y. l?t 1 0 16 0 0 17 0 0 5,\n0'X 100~ 0% 0% ,_U!Q~ _ _j).l_ 0'', 0 0 16 0 0- 16 l T n 7 O\" 100' O'l, O\", ~ 94 .~ - _fj_,_ '---_Q_ 0 l 16 1--0- - () - 15 1 l nr ~\" 1nn O'I' o,\n88'/. 6 ., ,. 6,: 0 0 15 0 l 14 l 2 n / 07 94\" oz. 6 ., \" A?Y. .6~ 1?'' 2 5 15 0 1 10 3 4 10'.Y 251 94: 0% 6t 59\n'\n18 24  0 0 'T6 0 u I I 0-- 0 07 0 ' .!.QQ. - o 0'', 100'! 0'' 0 ' 1 0 16 0 0 17 0 0 5,, 0~ 100 O'l. O'I. lf)Q_:\n0 0 . a . . 16- o- - . o  -- 0 17 0 0 0 0 1()0 0,. o. 100 '. o o . STEPHENS A/\u0026lt;:\u0026gt;. ,n,c:n ,N IJNU 10 1 0 Ql'l( Q'l 0 '% 10 0 O'.t I 91't 9:r. 10 0 I 91'.l: 01. 9~ 11 0 0 100'.t O'!', ... .Pl. 11 0 0 100~ 0\u0026gt;: O't II 0 0 inn , ..Jl:.i.. __ 01... 9R2i 1 I . 91,_ 9% 9 0 2 82'l Ol 18'1: 3 5 3 27\"'. 45')\n27'1. 8 0 3 _ll-4 ,____Q!_ 27'1. 4 3 4 36 ( zn -36'~ 11 0 0 l00 t 0'I. o\n11 0 0 ....100'.t _ 0% Ol 9 0 2 821 0% HI% 10 l 0 ---211 _9'.\n0,, 11 0 0 100 1, O'I, 01 7 l 3 \"'~ c\ni '77 1. 11 0 0 . L0QI, _ ..Q.:'c. - _Q'.'.,_ 10 I 0 __ SL Q\u0026gt; O\" 1 lnn,y 0 Oo/. 0 oz 10 l 0 .9.L. Q\" Oo/. 7 0 4 -6..4:'.. 0~ 1fi,Y, 10 0 l 91: o-:: 9'l lJ l u 82 ,~ 18 . 0' ', 10 0 -7- - 91' 0 ', 9 . TOTAL A/SAID/ SD IJI ' NR 69 I 2 I 961 1, ]W 62 4 6 86'1 6:.: Si. bU I 5 83:t 10% 7-:, ,o 2 0 97'! ) I _..QL_ 7 1--,--I - 0 99't bq W9.' 61 85: 57 79~ J~ 49,: 59 82% 31 431, 64 89 .!. btJ g4 . 56 ,w, 62 - 8(. ' 63 RR 54 1s, 71 99~. ro 97 I 69 QI, :', 66 Q?o/ 48 671 71 99:z 68 94 ' ~0- 9/ J ( o~ 3 ~ 4 , __]_ 9 2 131. P . 6 9 St I)~ Lb 11 36 15'Y, 4 9 6't 11', 20 21 28 1 291, 6 2 St, 3N u 4 M _hl__ 0 16 n n, 2 8 3, 1 1 ,: 0 9 0 ' --1.lL 5 7' 1\\B't, l 0 I 0\n, I [) 3 0 l 7.-.- l ' 1 \\ 2 r 4 6 . tJ 16 II ' 22 ', u r 0 I i 3 I :- 4~I-r~ - l , 0 I j I ~ 0 I QUESTI 0 \" l. School cli .. t: la aafe . 2 . School cl iaat is orderly . ). !:vsdence at acho?l of strong parent/citizen aiupport. '- 1 ~upr,ort. and/or participate in school_ activities. \n. !.t.itt i s trying to inc1c a:..o parcnt~l involveaent. 6. Vrogros av i lable to roach parents ~o help children. 7. I closely follow ay child' progr in school. 0 . Staff providos training to ncoura9c learning at ho ... ? . Child receive~ guidanco services at. uchool. .o . ::i no:-it:ies are involved in extracurricular proqraes. , .. :\ntandarctize4 t.esc results r used to identify nod. 1' . ,tcospber reflect.a high expectation  tor dvlopent . l .. Courses offrtJ .::a-.-,1t noel.I:. oJ all \u0026amp;tudont.=6. ... lt::ere is a stror.:r c~pha~i!: on bo::.ic skill :. . i. '..I. Starr 1 flexible and villinq to try new proqra1:1s. ! 6 . I oonitor the proqr of atudcnt closoly. 17. Appaar\u0026amp;J\\Cle ot bulhllng and 9rounda is satisfactory .. : 8 . Ottu:e statr ha positive tttt.ud and 1 courteous. : '). 1 ae t.isticd \"dt.h t.he pc-oqra1t1s or thlc c\nchool. I TABLE 11 MAJOR ENHANCEMENT SURVEY PARENTS, 1988-89 1 9 B B - 8 q MA.TOR E N H A N C GARLAND ISH MITCHELL A/CA n/c,n un,N1\u0026gt; 111,jc, \"n/cn un,uu IA/c,111, 'D, 2 0 0 8 l 0 12 0 0 1001 0\\ 0% 891 11% 0\\ 100\\ 0\\ 0\\ 2 0 0 8 l 0 11 0 l 100\\ 0\\ 01 89\\ 11\\ 0\\ 92\\ oi 8\\ ~ u u 6 I 2 8 0 4 100\\ 0\\ 01 67\\ 11\\ 22\\ 67\\ 0\\ 33\\ l 0 l 8 l 0 12 0 0 50\\ 0% 50\\ 89\\ 11\\ 0\\ 100\\ 0\\ 0% 2 0 0 7 l l 11 1 0 100\\ 01 01 78\\ 11\\ 111 92\\ 81 0\\ l 1 0 4 0 5 10 0 2 501 501 OI 441. no 561 831 01 171 7. 0 0 8 l 0 11 l 0 1001 OI 0\\ 89\\ 11\\ 01 92\\ B\\ 0\\ l 0 l a  0 1 10 0 2 501 n ,na 891 01 111 831 01 17\\ 1 0 l 6 0 3 10 0 2 501 o, 501 671 0\\ 331 83\\ o, 171 0 0 2 4 0 5 8 0 4 0\\ 01 1.00\\ 44\\ 0% 56% 671 0\\ 33\\ 2 0 0 6 0 3 11 0 l 100\\ 0\\ 0\\ 671 Ot 33\\ 921 01 81 2 0 0 7 l 1 12 0 0 1001 o, OI 781 111 11, 1001 OI o, l 0 l 4 l 4 11 0 l so, 0\\ so, 44' 11\\ 441 92\\ o, 81 0 0 2 8 0 l 12 0 0 01 01 1001 RQI. ._QI L.J..l'L 100, ...._21 0\\ --- 0 0 2 6 0 3 11 0 l 01 01 100\\ 671 0\\ 33\\ 92\\ 0\\ 8\\ l 0 l 7 l l 12 0 0 501 0\\ 501 78\\ lit 111 1001 0\\ Ot l 0 l 6 2 l lZ 0 u 50\\ o, 501 67\\ 221 11\\ 1001 01 o, l 0 l 8 0 l 12 0 0 so, 01 so, 89\\ o, 11\\ 1001 01 0\\ l 0 2 B 0 I 12 0 0 ,:n~ n rnn OM n, 117. lrnn. n m. KEY: A/SA D/SD NO/NR AGREE/STRONGLY AGREE DISAGREE/STRONGLY DISAGREE NO OPINION/NO RESPONSE E H F N '1' S C' H O O I \u0026lt;: . ,.R,O. CKE FELT.ER !n/sn Un JUD 7 2 l 70% 20\\ 10\\ 9 l 0 90\\ 10\\ 01 8 2 0 80\\ 20\\ 0% 8 0 2 80i 0% 20\\ 5 0 5 50\\ 0\\ 50\\ 5 2 3 so, 20\\ 30\\ 9 0 1 90\\ 0\\ 10\\ 9 1 0 901 10\\ o, 6 2 2 601 20\\ 20% 6 0 4 60\\ 0% 40\\ 6 0 4 601 0% 401 9 l 0 901 10\\ 01 5 2 3 501 20\\ 30\\ 8 2 0 80\\ 20\\ 0\\ 9 0 l 901 01 10\\ 9 0 l 901 01 10\\ 7 l 2 70\\ 101 201 8 2 0 801 20, 0\\ l 0 9 10% 0\\ 90't H. E. SCHOOLS ,. ,.,S. TEPHENS D/'- NO/NR A/SA 2 0 0 31 100\\ 0\\ 0% 89\\ 1 I 0 JI 50% 50\\ 0\\ 89% 2 0 0 Lb 100\\ 0% 0% 74% l l 0 30 so,. 50\\ O't 86% 2 0 0 2\"/ 100\\ 0% 0% 77\\ l 0 l 21 50\\ 0\\ 501 60% 0 l l 30 0\\ soi 50% 86% --1-- - 2 0 0 30 100\\ 0\\ 0% 86% 2 0 0 25 100% 0% 0% 71'1. l 0 l 19 50\\ 0% 50% 54\\ 2 0 0 27 1001 0\\ 0\\ 77\\ - 2 0 0 32 1001 0\\ Ot 91% 2 0 0 23 100\\ 0% 0% 66% l 0 l ~., so, 01 50% 83% -- 2 0 0 24 1001 Ot -0-\\ - 69% -- - 2 0 0 31 100, 0\\ 01 89% l 0 l 30 so, o, 501 86\\ -  - 2 0 0 29 100\\ o, 0% 83% -- --- 0 0 2 31 0% oi 100~ Rqi TOTAL in1sn NO / tJD 3 I 9\\ ) \\ J ~i- 9% 1i 3 6 - - 9\\ - --17%- 2 3 6\\ 9_L --2 - 6 6% 17% IJ - Ti - 9% 31\\ 3 2 1--~ 6% '---- 1 3% 2 6% 0 o, 0 0\\ --2 . 6\\ 3 9\\ . -- 6\\ - q - 0% 1 3% 2 61 -i- --3% - 2 6 4 11% ~-8 23% 16 46\\ --8- 23% l 3% - 9 26% - 4-- 11\\ --- 11 311 3 9\\ ) 91 - 5 14\\ ---- I ...i.:.,.. 2 f.i SCHOOL ruwm GARLAND l 2 3 4 5 6 ISH l 2 3 4 5 6 MITCHELL 1 2 3 4 5 6 ROCKEFELLER 1 2 3 4 5 6 STEPHENS l 2 3 4 5 6 LRSD 1 2 3 4 5 6 TABLE 12 LITl'LE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT MAT-6 DISTRICT SUMMARY VARIANCE.FROM LRSD HEAN OF AVERAGE NATIONAL PERCENTILE RANKS (NPR) BY SCHOOL Number in parenthesis is variance from NPR READING MATHEMATICS LANGUAGE ARTS SCIENCE SOCIAL STUDIES NPR 87-88 NPR 88-89 NPR 87-88 NPR 88-89 NPR 87-88 NPR 88-89 NPB 87-88 NPR 88-89 NPR 87-88 NPR 88-89 44 { -2) 30 (-22) 56 { -3) 43 {-22) 40 {-10) 41 { -9) 66 { +2) 46 (-17) 50 (-11) 52 (-10) 29 {-14) 20 {-24) 30 (-20) 38 (-22) 42 {-18) 42 {-22) 38 {-10) 42 i-10! 49 l -1i 47 (-16) 52 ( -5) 43 (-17) 39 (-11) 42 (-15) 38 (-13) 46 (-13) 24 {-24) 32 -19 34 -21 52 { -9) 33 (-22) 38 (-HI) 23 (-26) 43 (-10) 20 (-29) 43 (-10} 43 (-11) 24 {-30) 49 {-12) 31 (-33) 59 { -3) 29 (-36) 43 (-11) 17 (-40) 42 (-13) 20 (-39) 37 ! -9) 49 ( -3) 36 (-23) 57 ( -8) 55 +5) 49 ( -1) 83 (+19) 57 ( -6) 60 ( -1) 56 ( -6} 27 (-16) 41 ! -3) 40 (-10) 70 (+10) 44 (-16) 70 ( +6) 48 {A) 39 -13) 55 ( -1) 50 (-13) 57 (A) 46 (-14) 49 { -1) 47 (-10) 41 (-10) 44 (-15) 29 (-19) 37 {-14) 29 {-26) 47 i-14) 30 {-25) 37 (-19) 26 (-23) 41 (-12) 24 {-25) 39 (-14) 44 (-10} 41 {-13) 64 ( +3) 63 -1) 51 {-11) 59 ( -6) 33 (-21} 45 (-12) 39 (-16) 44 (-15) - 36 {-10) 51 ( -1) 46 {-13) 56 ( -9) 44 ( -6) 50 (A) 78 {+14) 83 { +20) 60 ( -1) 70 ( +8) 43 {A) 34 i-10) 52 l +2) 50 (-10) 62 ( +2) 57 ( -7) 44 ( -4) 46 -6) 61 +5) 55 ( -8) 69 {+12) 55 ( -5) 46 ( -4) 51 ( -6) 51 ( A ) 43 (-16) 41 ( -7) 44 ( -7) 55 ( A ) 56 ( -5) 49 ( -6} 52 ( -4) 39 (-10} 42 (-11) 40 { -9} 42 (-11) 28 (-26) 30 (-24) 44 (-17) 53 (-11) 47 {-15) 53 (-12) 31 (-23) 35 (-22) 34 (-21) 38 (-21) - 25 (-21) 32 (-20) 38 {-21) 61 ( -4) 41 ( -9) 34 {-16) 51 (-13) 52 (-11) 62 ( +2) 56 ( -6) 36 ( -7) 34 (-10) 32 (-18) 39 (-21) 58 ( -2) 59 ( -5) 40 ( -8) 45 { -7) 59 ( +3) 46 (-17) 59 ( +2) 51 ( -9) 41 ( -9) 44 (-13) 45 ( -6} 44 ( -1 5) 35 (-13) 42 ( -9) 48 ( -7) 64 ( +3) 46 ( -9) 54 ( -2) 32 (-17) 46 ( -7) 35 (-14) 42 (-11) 49 ( -5) 38 (-16) 63 ( +2) 68 ( +4) 64 ( +2) 63 ( -2) 47 ( -7) 52 ( -5) 47 ( -8) 52 ( -7) 21 {-25) 39 i-13) 40 (-19) 41 (-24) 32 (-18) 29 -21) 36 (-28) 40 (-23) 32 (-29) 47 (-15) 33 (-10} 27 (-17) 33 {-17) 38 (-22) 52 ( -8) 40 (-24) 44 ( -4) 46 { -6) 47 ( -9) 47 (-16) 48 ( -9} 51 ( -9} 45 ( -5) 43 (-14) 42 ( -9) 46 ( -13) 26 (-22) 45 { -6) 34 (-21) 58 ( -3) I 30 (-25) 43 (-13) 31 (-18) 52 ( -1) 25 (-24) 42 ( - 11) 42 {-12) 35 (-19) 45 {-16) 44 (-20) 45 (-17) 43 (-22) 47 ( -7) !i2 ( -5) 47 ( -8) 52 ( -7) 46 52 59 65 50 50 64 63 61 62 43 44 50 60 60 64 48 52 56 63 57 60 50 57 51 59 48 51 55 61 55 56 49 53 49 53 54 54 61 64 62 65 54 57 55 59 I .i::,. N I\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eLittle Rock School District\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"suc_gravely_150","title":"Mamie Norris oral history interview, 1989 December 1","collection_id":"suc_gravely","collection_title":"William Gravely Oral History Collection on the Lynching of Willie Earle","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, South Carolina, Greenville County, Greenville, 34.85262, -82.39401"],"dcterms_creator":["Norris, Mamie","Gravely, William"],"dc_date":["1989-12-01"],"dcterms_description":["An oral history interview by William Gravely with Mamie Norris on December 1, 1989. After grounding the interview with a discussion on what Mamie Norris knew and remembered of the lynching of Willie Earle in 1947, the conversation continued with further details on the racial landscape of the era (including segregation, community awareness, and the efforts of the NAACP). Includes a draft transcript and notes."],"dc_format":["audio/mpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Columbia, S.C. : University of South Carolina. Department of Oral History, University Libraries"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Call Number: GRA 037","William Gravely Oral History Collection on the Lynching of Willie Earle"],"dcterms_subject":["African Americans--South Carolina--History--20th century","African Americans--South Carolina--Interviews","Civil rights--South Carolina","Lynching--South Carolina--Greenville","Trials(Murder)--South Carolina--Greenville","Greenville County (S.C.)--Race Relations--History"],"dcterms_title":["Mamie Norris oral history interview, 1989 December 1"],"dcterms_type":["Sound"],"dcterms_provenance":["South Caroliniana Library"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://cdm17173.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/gravely/id/150"],"dcterms_temporal":["1946/1969"],"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Copyright: University of South Carolina. The transcript and audio are provided for individual research purposes only; for all other uses, including publication, reproduction, and quotation beyond fair use, permission must be obtained in writing from: Department of Oral History, University Libraries, University of South Carolina."],"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)"],"dcterms_extent":["59:01"],"dlg_subject_personal":["Norris, Mamie","Earle, Willie, 1922-1947"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"suc_gravely_144","title":"William Gravely audio notes, 1989 December 1 \u0026 1990 November 30","collection_id":"suc_gravely","collection_title":"William Gravely Oral History Collection on the Lynching of Willie Earle","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, South Carolina, Greenville County, Greenville, 34.85262, -82.39401"],"dcterms_creator":["Gravely, William"],"dc_date":["1989-12-1"],"dcterms_description":["A recording of Gravely's presentation at the Symposium on the Lynching of Willie Earle held at Furman University on November 30, 1990, as well as two broadcasts on the oral history collection project at local Greenville radio station WESC on December 1, 1989, and a telephone answering machine message regarding plans to visit and interview certain people for the oral history collection."],"dc_format":["audio/mpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Columbia, S.C. : University of South Carolina. Department of Oral History, University Libraries"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Call Number: GRA 023","William Gravely Oral History Collection on the Lynching of Willie Earle"],"dcterms_subject":["African Americans--South Carolina--History--20th century","African Americans--South Carolina--Interviews","Civil rights--South Carolina","Lynching--South Carolina--Greenville","Trials(Murder)--South Carolina--Greenville","Greenville County (S.C.)--Race Relations--History"],"dcterms_title":["William Gravely audio notes, 1989 December 1 \u0026 1990 November 30"],"dcterms_type":["Sound"],"dcterms_provenance":["South Caroliniana Library"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://cdm17173.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/gravely/id/144"],"dcterms_temporal":["1946/1969"],"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Copyright: University of South Carolina. The transcript and audio are provided for individual research purposes only; for all other uses, including publication, reproduction, and quotation beyond fair use, permission must be obtained in writing from: Department of Oral History, University Libraries, University of South Carolina."],"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)"],"dcterms_extent":["59:10"],"dlg_subject_personal":["Gravely, William","Earle, Willie, 1922-1947"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"suc_gravely_143","title":"William Gravely audio notes and conversations at WFBC Retiree Luncheon, 1989 December 13-14","collection_id":"suc_gravely","collection_title":"William Gravely Oral History Collection on the Lynching of Willie Earle","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, South Carolina, Greenville County, Greenville, 34.85262, -82.39401"],"dcterms_creator":["Gravely, William"],"dc_date":["1989-12"],"dcterms_description":["A personal tape by William Gravely documenting his progress and process in investigating and collecting oral histories concerning the lynching of Willie Earle. This recording includes Gravely's conversations and notes from the WFBC Radio \"\"Old-Timers Luncheon,\"\" with unidentified retirees of local radio station WFBC."],"dc_format":["audio/mpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Columbia, S.C. : University of South Carolina. Department of Oral History, University Libraries"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Call Number: GRA 026","William Gravely Oral History Collection on the Lynching of Willie Earle"],"dcterms_subject":["African Americans--South Carolina--History--20th century","African Americans--South Carolina--Interviews","Civil rights--South Carolina","Lynching--South Carolina--Greenville","Trials(Murder)--South Carolina--Greenville","Greenville County (S.C.)--Race Relations--History"],"dcterms_title":["William Gravely audio notes and conversations at WFBC Retiree Luncheon, 1989 December 13-14"],"dcterms_type":["Sound"],"dcterms_provenance":["South Caroliniana Library"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://cdm17173.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/gravely/id/143"],"dcterms_temporal":["1946/1969"],"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Copyright: University of South Carolina. The transcript and audio are provided for individual research purposes only; for all other uses, including publication, reproduction, and quotation beyond fair use, permission must be obtained in writing from: Department of Oral History, University Libraries, University of South Carolina."],"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)"],"dcterms_extent":["09:11"],"dlg_subject_personal":["Gravely, William","Earle, Willie, 1922-1947"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"suc_gravely_164","title":"Earle family discussion, 1989 November 30","collection_id":"suc_gravely","collection_title":"William Gravely Oral History Collection on the Lynching of Willie Earle","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, South Carolina, Greenville County, Greenville, 34.85262, -82.39401"],"dcterms_creator":["Lounds, Mary Earle","Kerne, Oliverene Earle","Lounds, Janet","Harris, Mary Elizabeth","Waite, Lila Stevens"],"dc_date":["1989-11-30"],"dcterms_description":["An Earle family discussion facilitated by Lila Stevens Waite on November 30, 1989, with Oliverene Earle Kerne and Mary Earle Lounds, along with Mary Earle Lounds' daughter Janet Lounds. Topics covered during the discussion include the location of different family members at the time of the lynching of Willie Earle, memories of Willie Earle, the police telling Willie Earle's mother to come and claim his body, and the effects of the lynching on the family. A draft transcript and notes are included."],"dc_format":["audio/mpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Columbia, S.C. : University of South Carolina. Department of Oral History, University Libraries"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Call Number: GRA 031","William Gravely Oral History Collection on the Lynching of Willie Earle"],"dcterms_subject":["African Americans--South Carolina--History--20th century","African Americans--South Carolina--Interviews","Civil rights--South Carolina","Lynching--South Carolina--Greenville","Trials(Murder)--South Carolina--Greenville","Greenville County (S.C.)--Race Relations--History"],"dcterms_title":["Earle family discussion, 1989 November 30"],"dcterms_type":["Sound"],"dcterms_provenance":["South Caroliniana Library"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://cdm17173.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/gravely/id/164"],"dcterms_temporal":["1946/1969"],"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Copyright: University of South Carolina. The transcript and audio are provided for individual research purposes only; for all other uses, including publication, reproduction, and quotation beyond fair use, permission must be obtained in writing from: Department of Oral History, University Libraries, University of South Carolina."],"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)"],"dcterms_extent":["48:30"],"dlg_subject_personal":["Lounds, Mary Earle","Kerne, Oliverene Earle","Lounds, Janet","Harris, Mary Elizabeth","Earle, Willie, 1922-1947"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"suc_gravely_130","title":"A.J. Whittenberg Jr. oral history interview, 1989 November 28","collection_id":"suc_gravely","collection_title":"William Gravely Oral History Collection on the Lynching of Willie Earle","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, South Carolina, Greenville County, Greenville, 34.85262, -82.39401"],"dcterms_creator":["Whittenberg, A. J., Jr.","Gravely, William"],"dc_date":["1989-11-28"],"dcterms_description":["An oral history interview by William Gravely with A.J. Whittenberg Jr., on November 28, 1989. This second oral history interview with Whittenberg included several stories of later interactions with defendants in the court case concerning suspected members of the lynching mob which killed Willie Earle, as well as commentary on a scrapbook of photos. A final transcript is included."],"dc_format":["audio/mpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Columbia, S.C. : University of South Carolina. Department of Oral History, University Libraries"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Call Number: GRA 054","William Gravely Oral History Collection on the Lynching of Willie Earle"],"dcterms_subject":["African Americans--South Carolina--History--20th century","African Americans--South Carolina--Interviews","Civil rights--South Carolina","Lynching--South Carolina--Greenville","Trials(Murder)--South Carolina--Greenville","Greenville County (S.C.)--Race Relations--History"],"dcterms_title":["A.J. Whittenberg Jr. oral history interview, 1989 November 28"],"dcterms_type":["Sound"],"dcterms_provenance":["South Caroliniana Library"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://cdm17173.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/gravely/id/130"],"dcterms_temporal":["1946/1969"],"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Copyright: University of South Carolina. The transcript and audio are provided for individual research purposes only; for all other uses, including publication, reproduction, and quotation beyond fair use, permission must be obtained in writing from: Department of Oral History, University Libraries, University of South Carolina."],"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)"],"dcterms_extent":["62:20"],"dlg_subject_personal":["Whittenberg, A. J., Jr.","Earle, Willie, 1922-1947"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"suc_abaker_4263","title":"Letter, 1989, Julie Cummins to Mary Umolu","collection_id":"suc_abaker","collection_title":"Augusta Baker papers, 1911-1998","dcterms_contributor":["Umolu, Mary H. (Mary Harden)"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, New York, Kings County, Brooklyn, 40.6501, -73.94958","United States, New York, New York County, New York, 40.7142691, -74.0059729"],"dcterms_creator":["Cummins, Julie"],"dc_date":["1989-11-28"],"dcterms_description":["Letter from Julie Cummins, Coordinator of Children's Services at the New York Public Library, to Mary Omolu, regarding the disastrous event hosted by The Association of Black Storytellers at the library. She states, \"This series of episodes has blemished our credibility with our public and the media. Even worse, it has tarnished the Association of Black storytellers and Medgar Evers College\"."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Columbia, S.C. : University of South Carolina. South Caroliniana Library"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Augusta Baker Papers, 1911-1998","Augusta Baker Papers, 1911-1998, Box 2, Folder 142. Accession 11770"],"dcterms_subject":["Cummins, Julie--Correspondence","Umolu, Mary H. (Mary Harden)--Correspondence","New York Public Library","Public libraries--New York (State)","National Association of Black Storytellers"],"dcterms_title":["Letter, 1989, Julie Cummins to Mary Umolu"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["University of South Carolina. Libraries","South Caroliniana Library"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://cdm17173.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/abaker/id/4263"],"dcterms_temporal":["1970/2026"],"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Copyright Not Evaluated. For further information please contact The University of South Carolina, South Caroliniana Library, Columbia, SC 29208."],"dcterms_medium":["correspondence"],"dcterms_extent":["1 item||3 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":["Cummins, Julie","Umolu, Mary H. (Mary Harden)"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"aar_amg_67129","title":"Dr. Robert Gilliard and Joseph Langan at an NAACP meeting in Mobile, Alabama.","collection_id":"aar_amg","collection_title":"Alabama Media Group Collection","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Alabama, 32.75041, -86.75026"],"dcterms_creator":["Colquitt, Ron"],"dc_date":["1989-11-17"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Montgomery, Ala. : Alabama. Department of Archives and History"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Mobile Press-Register","Alabama Media Group","Alabama Media Group Collection"],"dcterms_subject":["African Americans--Civil rights","Civic leaders","Civil rights","Mayors--Alabama--Mobile","Municipal officials and employees--Alabama--Mobile","Race relations--Alabama","Mobile (Ala.)","Mobile County (Ala.)"],"dcterms_title":["Dr. Robert Gilliard and Joseph Langan at an NAACP meeting in Mobile, Alabama."],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Alabama. Department of Archives and History"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://digital.archives.alabama.gov/cdm/ref/collection/amg/id/67129"],"dcterms_temporal":["1980/1989"],"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Copyright, Alabama Department of Archives and History. Donated by the Alabama Media Group, http://www.alabamamediagroup.com"],"dcterms_medium":["negatives (photographs)","black-and-white negatives"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Gilliard, Robert","Langan, Joseph"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null}],"pages":{"current_page":808,"next_page":809,"prev_page":807,"total_pages":6717,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":9684,"total_count":80598,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"educator_resource_mediums_sms","items":[{"value":"lesson plans","hits":319},{"value":"teaching guides","hits":53},{"value":"timelines (chronologies)","hits":43},{"value":"online exhibitions","hits":38},{"value":"bibliographies","hits":15},{"value":"study guides","hits":11},{"value":"annotated bibliographies","hits":9},{"value":"learning modules","hits":6},{"value":"worksheets","hits":6},{"value":"slide shows","hits":4},{"value":"quizzes","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":40083},{"value":"StillImage","hits":34810},{"value":"MovingImage","hits":4457},{"value":"Sound","hits":3178},{"value":"Collection","hits":41},{"value":"InteractiveResource","hits":25}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"Peppler, Jim","hits":4964},{"value":"Phay, John E.","hits":4712},{"value":"University of Mississippi. Bureau of Educational Research","hits":4707},{"value":"Baldowski, Clifford H., 1917-1999","hits":2599},{"value":"Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission","hits":2255},{"value":"Thurmond, Strom, 1902-2003","hits":2077},{"value":"WSB-TV (Television station : Atlanta, Ga.)","hits":1475},{"value":"Newman, I. DeQuincey (Isaiah DeQuincey), 1911-1985","hits":1003},{"value":"The State Media Company (Columbia, S.C.)","hits":926},{"value":"Atlanta Journal-Constitution","hits":844},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":778}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"African Americans--Civil rights","hits":9441},{"value":"Civil rights","hits":8353},{"value":"African Americans","hits":5889},{"value":"Mississippi--Race relations","hits":5750},{"value":"Race relations","hits":5629},{"value":"Education, Secondary","hits":5083},{"value":"Education, Elementary","hits":4729},{"value":"Segregation in education--Mississippi","hits":4727},{"value":"Education--Pictorial works","hits":4707},{"value":"Civil rights demonstrations","hits":4440},{"value":"Civil rights workers","hits":3536}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966--Correspondence","hits":1888},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1812},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1709},{"value":"Baker, Augusta, 1911-1998","hits":1515},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1312},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1068},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":858},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":814},{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":719},{"value":"Mizell, M. Hayes","hits":674},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":626}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"name_authoritative_sms","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":2598},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1912},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1704},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1331},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1068},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":856},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":806},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":625},{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":605},{"value":"Snelling, Paula","hits":580},{"value":"Williams, Hosea, 1926-2000","hits":440}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Nobel Prize","hits":1767},{"value":"Ole Miss Integration","hits":1671},{"value":"Housing Act of 1961","hits":969},{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":851},{"value":"Memphis Sanitation Workers Strike","hits":366},{"value":"Selma-Montgomery March","hits":337},{"value":"Freedom Summer","hits":306},{"value":"Freedom Rides","hits":214},{"value":"Poor People's Campaign","hits":180},{"value":"University of Georgia Integration","hits":173},{"value":"University of Alabama Integration","hits":140}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":17850},{"value":"United States, Georgia, Fulton County, Atlanta, 33.749, -84.38798","hits":5180},{"value":"United States, Alabama, Montgomery County, Montgomery, 32.36681, -86.29997","hits":5132},{"value":"United States, Georgia, 32.75042, -83.50018","hits":4848},{"value":"United States, South Carolina, 34.00043, -81.00009","hits":4801},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":4354},{"value":"United States, Alabama, 32.75041, -86.75026","hits":3966},{"value":"United States, Mississippi, 32.75041, -89.75036","hits":2907},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":2611},{"value":"United States, Tennessee, Shelby County, Memphis, 35.14953, -90.04898","hits":2580},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":2562}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Georgia","hits":12565},{"value":"Alabama","hits":11312},{"value":"Mississippi","hits":10214},{"value":"South Carolina","hits":8696},{"value":"Arkansas","hits":4750},{"value":"Texas","hits":4400},{"value":"Tennessee","hits":3440},{"value":"Ohio","hits":2403},{"value":"Florida","hits":2323},{"value":"North Carolina","hits":1876},{"value":"New York","hits":1843}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1966","hits":10500},{"value":"1963","hits":10135},{"value":"1965","hits":10079},{"value":"1956","hits":9779},{"value":"1955","hits":9549},{"value":"1964","hits":9225},{"value":"1968","hits":9218},{"value":"1962","hits":9127},{"value":"1967","hits":8773},{"value":"1957","hits":8457},{"value":"1958","hits":8196},{"value":"1961","hits":8157},{"value":"1959","hits":7992},{"value":"1960","hits":7813},{"value":"1969","hits":7223},{"value":"1954","hits":7174},{"value":"1950","hits":7039},{"value":"1953","hits":6913},{"value":"1970","hits":6714},{"value":"1971","hits":6376},{"value":"1977","hits":6341},{"value":"1972","hits":6234},{"value":"1952","hits":6105},{"value":"1951","hits":5991},{"value":"1975","hits":5868},{"value":"1974","hits":5847},{"value":"1976","hits":5835},{"value":"1973","hits":5671},{"value":"1979","hits":5389},{"value":"1978","hits":5378},{"value":"1980","hits":5324},{"value":"1995","hits":4849},{"value":"1981","hits":4768},{"value":"1994","hits":4662},{"value":"1948","hits":4561},{"value":"1949","hits":4532},{"value":"1996","hits":4517},{"value":"1982","hits":4377},{"value":"1947","hits":4276},{"value":"1998","hits":4257},{"value":"1985","hits":4252},{"value":"1997","hits":4235},{"value":"1983","hits":4218},{"value":"1984","hits":4105},{"value":"1999","hits":4047},{"value":"1946","hits":4005},{"value":"1945","hits":3970},{"value":"1986","hits":3957},{"value":"1990","hits":3932},{"value":"2000","hits":3874},{"value":"2001","hits":3862},{"value":"1943","hits":3854},{"value":"1944","hits":3850},{"value":"1942","hits":3818},{"value":"1941","hits":3710},{"value":"1940","hits":3705},{"value":"1987","hits":3700},{"value":"2002","hits":3610},{"value":"1991","hits":3510},{"value":"2003","hits":3475},{"value":"1936","hits":3471},{"value":"1939","hits":3471},{"value":"1992","hits":3456},{"value":"1993","hits":3440},{"value":"1938","hits":3434},{"value":"1937","hits":3413},{"value":"1989","hits":3380},{"value":"1930","hits":3342},{"value":"1988","hits":3295},{"value":"1935","hits":3264},{"value":"1933","hits":3241},{"value":"1934","hits":3240},{"value":"1932","hits":3225},{"value":"1931","hits":3210},{"value":"2005","hits":3125},{"value":"2004","hits":2973},{"value":"2006","hits":2843},{"value":"1929","hits":2763},{"value":"1928","hits":2244},{"value":"1921","hits":2100},{"value":"2016","hits":2015},{"value":"1925","hits":2012},{"value":"1927","hits":2003},{"value":"1926","hits":1988},{"value":"1924","hits":1987},{"value":"1920","hits":1948},{"value":"1923","hits":1933},{"value":"1922","hits":1906},{"value":"2007","hits":1707},{"value":"2011","hits":1660},{"value":"2008","hits":1656},{"value":"2019","hits":1626},{"value":"2009","hits":1616},{"value":"2015","hits":1616},{"value":"2013","hits":1615},{"value":"2010","hits":1599},{"value":"2014","hits":1568},{"value":"2012","hits":1563},{"value":"2017","hits":1512},{"value":"1919","hits":1509}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"0193","max":"2036","count":501655,"missing":54},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"photographs","hits":10657},{"value":"correspondence","hits":9648},{"value":"black-and-white photographs","hits":7497},{"value":"negatives (photographs)","hits":7486},{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":4339},{"value":"letters (correspondence)","hits":3623},{"value":"oral histories (literary works)","hits":3607},{"value":"black-and-white negatives","hits":2772},{"value":"editorial cartoons","hits":2620},{"value":"newspapers","hits":1952},{"value":"manuscripts (documents)","hits":1692}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/","hits":41174},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":16803},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/UND/1.0/","hits":8830},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/","hits":7110},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/","hits":2209},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/","hits":1779},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-CR/1.0/","hits":1115},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","hits":145},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/","hits":59},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-RUU/1.0/","hits":51},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","hits":27}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Jim Peppler Southern Courier Photograph Collection","hits":4956},{"value":"John E. Phay Collection ","hits":4706},{"value":"John J. Herrera Papers","hits":3288},{"value":"Baldy Editorial Cartoons, 1946-1982, 1997: Clifford H. Baldowski Editorial Cartoons at the Richard B. Russell Library.","hits":2607},{"value":"Sovereignty Commission Online","hits":2335},{"value":"Strom Thurmond Collection, Mss 100","hits":2068},{"value":"Alabama Media Group Collection","hits":2067},{"value":"Black Trailblazers, Leaders, Activists, and Intellectuals in Cleveland","hits":2033},{"value":"Rosa Parks Papers","hits":1948},{"value":"Isaiah DeQuincey Newman, (1911-1985), Papers, 1929-2003","hits":1904},{"value":"Lillian Eugenia Smith Papers (circa 1920-1980)","hits":1887}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"John Davis Williams Library. Department of Archives and Special Collections","hits":8885},{"value":"Alabama. Department of Archives and History","hits":8153},{"value":"South Caroliniana Library","hits":4949},{"value":"Atlanta University Center Robert W. Woodruff Library","hits":4127},{"value":"University of North Texas. Libraries","hits":3854},{"value":"University of South Carolina. Libraries","hits":3459},{"value":"Hargrett Library","hits":3292},{"value":"Richard B. Russell Library for Political Research and Studies","hits":2874},{"value":"Mississippi. Department of Archives and History","hits":2825},{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":2816},{"value":"Rhodes College","hits":2264}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":80147},{"value":"Collection","hits":451}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":80401},{"value":"true","hits":197}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}