{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_523","title":"Little Rock Schools: Bale Elementary","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1995/1999"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Hardin Bale Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock Schools: Bale Elementary"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/523"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nLittle Rock School District Hardin Bale Elementary School, named for local businessman and Little Rock School Board member, Hardin Bale, was dedicated in 1959. Bale Elementary is located five blocks west of the University of Arkansas at Little Rock  a wonderful location for college-bound parents. Southwest Junior High School is conveniently located adjacent to Bale Elementary, which assures parents nine years of education in one localized area. Bale's programs are designed, organized and implemented to provide all students with success-oriented, comprehensive and progressive educational opportunities. Each student is provided with the opportunity for maximum intellectual and interpersonal development at all levels of achievement. This allows each student to compete with his/her own potential and internal motivation. The school stands by its motto  \"Making excellence prevail at Bale. ft cn ft hiuu wi \u0026lt; e o 7) n I z p 0o0 c ft O O r3* ft (\u0026gt;/I si- S cn S-? -sj Oo -5I NJ f5t 2. S - 2 S  ft S' O ft J O c o 6 z o 3 Excellence Prevails At Bale First Class Schools For World Class Kids Numerous extracurricular activities available in many LRSD schools are offered at Bale. They include the Just Say No Club, educational field trips, peer tutors, a Multicultural Fair, Red Ribbon Week and DEAR (Drop Everything and Read.) Bale is unique, however, in ofi^ering the only Recorder Choir and Talking Hands Sign Language Club in the District at elementary level. The school also has an ongoing gardening project, giving each grade level a plot of land to develop. Community support is alive and well at Bale, too! The Arkansas Department of Human Resources is the schools Partner in Education and supports the teaching staff by encouraging their employees to become active volunteers in the Junior League of Little Rocks WOW (Wonders of Works) mentor program. This innovative program matches selected sixth graders with professionals and gives the student an opportunity to learn about their mentors workplace first hand. (o0 E I Q Va 0n)i E ai \u0026gt; 03 A North W. 32nd Bale ElemeDtary o c  Asher Ave.  Early childhood program for four-year -olds  Located near UALR and adjacent to Southwest Junior High School  Full-time specialist for hearing impaired students  Bales Bright Ideas,\" a special parenting resource room open to all parents  Full-time specialists in speech, reading, math, gifted and talented, music and computer skills  Certified Staff, 51 percent with graduate degrees  Before and after school CARE Program, 7 a.m. - 5:30 p.m.  Participant in the Learning for Life pilot project which teaches life skills of self-esteem. confidence, discipline, reliance and a sense of fair play and team spirit FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT Bale Elementary School 6501 West 32nd Street Telephone 570-4050 or LRSD Student Assignment Office 501 Sherman Telephone 324-2272 Bale School has a sound and comprehensive philosophy, based on the intellectual, physical, social and emotional needs of the students. The dedicated and capable staff work togetherwith parents and community supporters to provide the very best education and environment available for each child enrolled in the school. Located in a residential neighborhood just a few blocks west of the University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Bale Elementary School offers a small, caring school community in a location that is easily accessible. This location offers many parents the opportunity to be more active in their children's school experiences. Whether its sharing a lunch date, attending school day performances or simply being closer for those inevitable calls about childhood illnesses, parents will find that having their children attend Bale is as convenient for them as it is enriching and satisfying for their children. 1021 '97 OS : 13 501 324 2023 LRSI) COlMl'MCATI ODM @001 'OOI Little Rock School District F ax TO: (. entral Arloinsas Media Page I tif 1 Photo OpporttniiU October 2], 1997 For more iaidimation\nZeomee Hen\n324-2020 Miss Arkansas Stacy Freeman will kick off Red Ribbon Week actitities at Bide Ebraentary School this morning at 9:00 a.rrt. Ms, Freeman will participaie in an assembly in lie school cafetena. 810 West Markham Street Lii Ie Kock, Arkansas 72201  i501l324-2000 Arkansas Democrat \"^(Gazette\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_536","title":"Little Rock Schools: Fair Park Elementary","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1995/2004"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Fair Park Elementary School (Little Rock, Ark.)","School facilities","Educational planning"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock Schools: Fair Park Elementary"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/536"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nMs Linda Leakey L\nitleRock,AR. 72205-3722  01 ' CclirfctfulS NitliohR,! Sl:.'^*\u0026lt;% S F FEB 1 5 1995 Office of Oesegregaiion Little Rock School District Fair Park School Relocation A Business Case January, 1995 Addition Modification Z Deletion $637,000 savings l//'KFair Park School Relocation Business Case 2 Executive Summary For several years, the Little Rock School District (LRSD) has faced Though many strategies were developed to cut costs, most have been \u0026lt; austere budgets. , , * ------------------------- one time cuts. A comparison of the district's total building capacity and total enrollment shows vacant seats. While a larger than normal number of desegregation, the number of vacant seats many seats are necessary for is significant. Said another way, LRSD has too many school buildings. The financing of any school is a major expense. Therefore, serious consideration must be given to closing some schools. It is a reasonable strategy. e savings are significant and are repeated from year to year. As attractive as it is to saving money, it is more unattractive to the patrons of the school considered for closing. Because it is an emotional i.s.sup. roooarrii ___j __i.-__._ issue, specific research criteria were used in making the decision about which school to close. Fair Park has become expendable as a public school because of its isolation, its declining enrollment, and its increasing costs in per pupil expenditure and in building operation. The following are reasons why Fair Park Elementary School is considered for closing: 1. 2. As of October 1,1994, the school was filled to only 80.34% of its capacity\nThe capacity of the school itself (351) is below the district average of 425 for ekmentary schools. Therefore, if the school were at capacity, the size itself is significantly below the average\narea 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Enrollment since 1989 has declined from 332 to 282 and is expected to continue\nThe school is out of racial balance by 12.34%. It has not been within balance as far back as 1989 in spite of efforts to reverse this\nThe per pupil cost has increased\nOperational costs for the building have increased to make this school as one on the most expensive to operate annually\nThe building is in need of renovation and upgrading. Together these costs will exceed $1,000,000, which is considerably more that the average cost of renovation and upgrading needed at other buildings\nBy the opening of school for 1995-96, Fair Park students will be relocated, faculty wiU be reassigned according to the negotiated contract, and appropriate reductions in positions will be completed with a minimum of disruption to these individuals and the school district. Plan. Fulfilling this proposal will require a modification to the LRSD Desegregation This proposal supports LRSD goals relating to securing financial resources necessary to support schools and the desegregation program. The problem will be considered solved if the following list of criteria is met\n1. New attendance zones affected by this relocation will reflect a better racial balance\nSHtomuMK Or Hntn-P **iliT-i TuiirnjiiiTiWiii nr FtnMcrxvFair Park School Relocation Business Case 3 2. 3. 4. The community is given the opportunity to be heard on the decision\nTransportation is re-routed to accommodate these students\nSpecial activities are planned and implemented by each new school to make the new students and patrons feel welcomed\n0. New patrons are included in appropriate school correspondence and activities with those who have been enrolled\n6. Leaders within tire community are made aware of the relocation plan and have the opportunity for input\ns Immediate cost savings is realized\nand, The relocation of students and staff at will be complete before the opening of school tnr T QQ^ 04. for 1995-96. Most of these benefits will occur when the process concludes. Desegregation Plan goals will not be altered. Parent concerns about the process and their newly assigned school will be minimal. District officials are aware that the commumty will be concerned about relocating the students. A number of school buddings have been abandoned in the city, piese are of paramount concern to many community members. Some will want to know if a plan exists for use of the building when the students are relocated. Some will w^t assurance that students will receive equal program quality in the reassigned school. While these concerns are understandable, we believe we can offer our students an equal program in a more economical way while achieving a better racial balance. Negatives 1. Students and staff will their friends\nexperience some disappointment in being separated from 2. 3. Commumty reaction will be strong against the decision for fear of the impact on the community as mentioned above\nThe building may stand vacant for a period of time if not used by an agency or the community\n4. The general community may react to the redrawing of attendance general area of the city. zones in that Positives 1. Students will receive assignment to schools equal to current programs\n2. Special activities will be planned and implemented by each newly assigned school make new students and patrons feel welcomed\nto Swtwmwd tw O Hmvt r Wt oi'Ot'ws R- ranttcoocPair Park School Relocation Business Case 4 3. New patrons are included in appropriate school correspondence and activities with those who have been enrolled\n4. Elementary schools in contiguous areas are capable of absorbing the student population of Fair Park\n5. Immediate and year-to-year cost savings will be realized of approximately $637,000\n6. The Fair Park School facility may be available to the community for use pending court approval. risks of not implementing this solution is increasing district costs thus inhibiting the expected goals of desegregation and responsible fiscal management. It is critical that the process be complete before the opening of school for 1995-96. H this solution is to be implemented, patrons will need to know immediately after the Board of Directors decides to pursue this alternative. Awareness and input must be generated in the community through meetings. Eventually, students must be notified of their new assignments, and a number of other tasks as noted in the timeline (later page) must be addressed. This will impact projected enrollment at other schools, transportation, food services, and the relocation of students, staff, and equipment. The following milestones for implementing this proposal are suggested and will be monitored by the Associate Superintendent for Desegregation. ____________ Milestone _______________ 1. Develop a list of key people in the community who should be contacted immediately 2. Contact the principals of surrounding schools who may be affected by the relocation 3. Business Case presented to the LRSD Board of Directors for approval_____________ 4. Make contact with key people in the community who should be contacted immediately and solicit support for getting people to community information meetings. Include PTA president and ministers. _______________ 5. Compile list and mailing labels of all students living in the Fair Park School attendance zone and those scheduled to attend the school. Sort the lists by: a) those who attend Fair Park School but live outside of the attendance zone b) those who attend Fair Park School but live in the attendance zone\nand, c) those who do not attend Fair Park School but live in the attendance zone._ 6. Develop notice of relocation and date of community information meeting to send to: a) parents \u0026amp; students: b) community groups and churches\nc) media (press release) d) for door-to-door delivery in the neighborhood ___________________ 7. Conduct informational meeting with the principal, faculty, and staff about the process 8. Mail notice of possible relocation and date of community infonnation meeting to: a) parents \u0026amp; students\nb) community groups and churches: c) media (press release)____________________________________ 9. Deliver fliers, door-to-door, announcing the relocation and date of the information meeting__________________ 10. Conduct community information meetings by___________________ 11. Notify finance person to include this as a budget reduction strategy________ 12. File motion with the U. S. Federal Court to relocate students at Fair Park School Date 1/13/95 1/25/95 1/31/95 2/10/95 2/10/95 2/10/95 2/10/95 212^135 2/22/95 2/28/95 3/3/95 3/15/95 Person Modeste Modeste Williams Modeste Mayo Mayo Modeste Mayo Mayo Williams Williams Williams SoMitMtaM K n HMn r WdliMM. Swiwnniiih^ m OIW'W, K- FwcocrFair Park School Relocation Business Case 3 Milestone 13. Develop letter to parents and students with 14. Inventory building_______ announcement and reassignment. 15. Design plan for new attendance zones in southwest.______ 16. Mail letter to parents and students with announcement and assignment 17. Remove materials and equipment from schSoT ' 18. Reroute transportation of students 19. Secure building 20. Reassign staff 21. Send final assignment notices Date 4/19/95 5/30/95 6/1/95 6/15/95 7/31/95 7/31/95 7/31/95 7/31/95 8/1/95 Person Mayo Neal Mayo Mayo Eaton Cheatham Eaton Hurley Mayo Background For several years, the Little Rock School District (LRSD) has faced austere budgets. Though many strategies were developed to cut costs, most have been one time cuts. A comparison of the district's total buUding capacity and total enrollment shows vacant seats. While a larger than normal number of many seats are necessary for ^segregation, the number of vacant seats is significant. Said another way, LRSD has too many school buildings. The financing of any school is a major expense. Therefore, ^rious consideration must be given to closing some schools. It is a reasonable strategy' The savings are significant and are repeated from year to year. As attractive as it is to saving money, it is more unattractive to the patrons of the school considered for closing. Because it is an emotional issue, specific research criteria were used in making the decision about which school to close.  Based on the criteria used. Fair Park Elementary School is a school that must be considered for closing. It is located north of 1-630 and just west of University Avenue in the City of Little Rock. See Attachment A. Reasons for this conclusion are explained in this business case. I Problem Definition Fair Park has become expendable as a public school because of its isolation, its declining enrollment, and its increasing costs in per pupil expenditure and in building operation. The following are reasons why Fair Park Elementary School is considered for closing: 1. As of October 1,1994, the school was filled to only 80.34% of its capacity\n2. The capacity of the school itself (351) is below the district average of 425 for area elementary' schools. Therefore, if the school were at capacity, the size itself is . significantly below the average\n3. Enrollment since 1989 has declined from 332 to 282 and is expected to continue\nllllulll il K t\u0026gt; HMn P WiliMm.iwfvnnMaMm rpKriiFair Park School Relocation Business Case 6 4. 5. 6. The school is out of racial balance by 12.34%. back as 1989 in spite of efforts to reverse this\nThe per pupil cost has increased\nIt has not been within balance as far Operational costs for the building have increased to make this school as one most expensive to operate annually\non the 7. The building is in need of renovation and upgrading. Together these costs will exceed $1,000,000, which is considerably more that the average cost of renovation and upgrading needed at other buildings\nFigure I illustrates some of these trends. Figure 1 Fair Park Elementary Enrollment History Criteria Enrollmenfl % Black % Out of Balance Capacity Attnd. Zone TtlF 1989-90 199Q-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 AZ % Black 332 72.00 12.00 94.59 345 80.87 20.87 98.29 320 80.31 20.31 91.17 243 79.01 19.01 69.23 263 76.05 16.05 74.93 343 49.27 282 72.34 12.34 80.34 348 53.44 I Analysis of Alternatives Solutions were discussed with a committee representing administrators in the LRSD. Data on attendance zones, enrollment, ethnic makeup of students in the school as well as those in the attendance zone were reviewed. After considerable discussion, it was decided that three things must be addressed for an alternative to be satisfactory. They were age of building, increasing costs, and low capacity. Addressing only one or two and not all three aspects seriously compromises an effective solution. Inherent in the selection of an alternative is the assumption that the problem can be addressed adequately if the alternative offers quality for students and cost efficiency Enrollments are for October of each year. - Attendance zone data is available for two years only. 'oriMHIvdK Of Hf\" r WilliMM SwrjwinMb W miifin tc nruinrFair Park School Relocation . Business Case 7 for tax-payers. To be a good alternative, it must address adequately all concern. The alternative solutions considered are listed below\nareas of 1. Change nothing. This will not address any aspect of the problem and will allow costs to grow annually\n2. Kedrnn, the attendance zone to increase the number of students attending Fair Park School. This reduces the per-pupil costs at Fair Park but will increase costs elsewhere since another attendance zone must be reduced to enlarge Fair Park's. Further, it would impact in negative ways the enrollment of other schools. 3. Relocate students from Fair Park to solve the problem. This alternative addresses all three areas of the problem. a) A plan to relocate students wiU be devised. One possible scenario appears in Attachment C\nb) An immediate savings of approximately $637,000 will be realized by eliminating the need for management staff, food service, building maintenance. and utilities to name a few\nc) Staff win be relocated according to the provisions of the negotiated contract. d) The curriculum offered at Fair Park will be offered at other schools under the program for that particular school. 4. Intensify recruitment efforts. Recruitment has been tried. The results have not been significant. If the enrollment of Fair Park were increased by this effort, it would have a negative impact on neighboring attendance zones. Recommendation Alternative 3 is recommended. 3. Relocate students from Fair Park to solve the problem. This alternative addresses all of the problem areas. I Objective By the opening of school for 1995-96, Fair Park students will be relocated, faculty will be reassigned according to the negotiated contract, and appropriate reductions in positions will be completed with a minimum of disruption to these individuals and the school district. Fulfilling this proposal will require a modification to the LRSD Desegregation This proposal supports LRSD goals relating to securing financial resources Plan. necessary^ to support schools and the desegregation program. The problem will be considered solved if the following list of criteria is met: Or. Hmm* T WditFair Park School Relocation Business Case 8 1. 2. 3. 4. New attendance zones affected by this relocation will reflect a better racial balance\nThe community is given the opportunity to be heard on the decision\nTransportation is re-routed to accommodate these students\nSpecial activities are planned and implemented by each new school to make the new students and patrons feel welcomed\n5. New patrons are included in appropriate school correspondence and activities with those who have been enrolled\n6. Leaders within the community are made aware of the relocation plan and have the opportunity for input\n7. 8. Immediate cost savings is realized\nand, The relocation of students and staff at will be complete before the opening of school for 1995-96. Most of these benefits will occur when the process concludes. Desegregation Plan goals will not be altered. Parent concerns about the process and their newly assigned school will be minimal. I Impact Analysis The desegregation plan must be modified to accommodate this proposal. District officials are aware that the community will be concerned about relocating the students. A number of school buildings have been abandoned in the city. These are of paramoimt concern to many community members. Some will want to know if a plan exists for use of the building when the students are relocated. Some will want assurance that students will receive equal program quality in the reassigned school. While these concerns are understandable, we believe we can offer our students an equal program in a more economical way while achieving a better racial balance. Negatives 1. Students and staff will experience their friends\nsome disappointment in being separated from 2. 3. Community reaction will be strong against the decision for fear of the impact on the community as mentioned above\nThe building may stand vacant for a period of time if not used by an agency or the community\n4. The general community may react to the redrawing of attendance zones in that general area of the city. DxlaaMUU O Hmrv P w MpK.rr-Fair Park School Relocation Business Case 9 Positives 1. 2. 3. 4. Students will receive assignment to schools equal to current programs\nSpecial activities will be planned and implemented by each newly assigned school make new students and patrons feel welcomed\nto New patrons are included in appropriate school correspondence and activities with those who have been enrolled\nElementary schools in contiguous areas are capable of absorbing the student population of Fair Park\n. Immediate and year-to-year cost savings will be realized of approximately $637,000\n6. The Fair Park School facility may be available to the community for use pending court a T-iT^-r 7 o 1 approval. Risks implementing this solution is increasing district costs thus inhibiting the expected goals of desegregation and responsible fiscal management. The risks of implementation of this solution are several. Some are criticism for abandoning another school building in the community, inconveniencing the students who walk to school, and the possibility that this solution will not realize all of the benefits exactly as anticipated. Timing It is critical that the process be complete before the opening of school for 1995-96. If this solution is to be implemented, patrons will need to know immediately after the Board of Directors decides to pursue this alternative. Awareness and input must be generated in the community through meetings. Eventually, students must be notified of their new assignments, and a number of other tasks as noted in the timeline (later page) must be addressed. This will impact projected enrollment at other schools, transportation, food services, and the relocation of students, staff, and equipment. I Resources Analysis Personnel No additional positions are necessary to implement this proposal. Instead, some positions will be eliminated. No one zoill lose his or her job, however. Attrition will be used to eliminate positions. oi/nzt iw- fnK (wFair Park School Relocation Business Case 10 Financial A savings of approximately $637,000 is the estimated benefit under this plan. This includes the cost of relocating students, staff, and equipment. The savings are year-to-year. Revenue Source A source of revenue is unnecessary. Implementation of this proposal cost-reducing strategy for the district's budget. creates a I Force Field Ana lysis Primary supporters of this proposal will be those who do not have children attending the school. The Board of Directors and adirunistration of the school district are well aware of the improvement this solution wiU bring for student opportunities and for cost savings. Those most opposed to the solution will be those in the immediate area of the school. These include some parents of students attending the school, community groups, and churches. They may argue that too many buildings have been closed, abandoned, and now are eye-sores in communities\nThat a school is the life of a wholesome community. Some say that removing a school from a community removes the last hope for the survival of that community. The negative reaction may be reduced by keeping everyone informed as the decision is made and unplemented. One-to-one meetings with key community people will allow for their questions and an attempt to resolve their concerns. I General Implementation Plan The following milestones for implementing this proposal are suggested and will be monitored by the Associate Superintendent for Desegregation. Milestone 1. Develop a list of key people in the community who should be contacted immediately 2. Contact the principals of surrounding schools who may be affected by the relocation 3. Business Case presented to the LRSD Soard of Directors for approval_____________ 4. Make contact with key people in the community who should be contacted immediately and solicit support for getting people to community information meetings. Include PTA president and ministers._______________________ 5. Compile list and mailing labels of all students living in the Fair Park School attendance zone and those scheduled to attend the school. Sort the lists by: a) those who attend Fair Park School but live outside of the attendance zone b) those who attend Fair Park School but live in the attendance zone\nand, c) those who do not attend Fair Park School but live in the attendance zone. Date 1/13/95 1/25/95 1/31/95 2/10/95 2/10/95 Person Modeste Modeste Williams Modeste Mayo Oi RT rwicoccFair Park School Relocation Business Case 11 Milestone 6. Develop notice of relocation and date of community information meeting to send to- a) parents \u0026amp; students: b) community groups and churches\nc) media (press release) d) for door-to-door delivery in the neighborhood 2- Conduct informational meeting with the pnncipal, faculty, and staff ahnnt thp nn-pcc Q nnllAx  ---------------_______________ 8. Mail notice of possible relocation and date of a) parents \u0026amp; students\nb) community groups and churches\nc) media (press release) community information meeting to: 9. Deliver fliers, door-to-door, announcing the relocation and date of the information meeting 10. Conduct community information meetings by ' ------------------- 11. Notify finance person to include this as a budget reduction strategy______ 12. File motion with the U, S. Federal Court to relocate students at Fair Park School .13. Developletter to parents and students with announcement and reassignment 14. Inventory building ' ------------------ 15. Design plan for new attendance zones in southwest._______ 16. Mail letter to parents and students with announcement and assignment_______ 17. Remove materials and equipment from school ----------- 18. Reroute transportation of students  -------------------- 19. Secure building ------------------------ 20. Reassign staff ~ ------------------------------------ 21. Send final assignment notices twMWMM K O Hmn r Date 2/10/95 2/10/95 2/20/95 2/22/95 2/28/95 3/3/95 3/15/95 4/19/95 5/30/95 6/1/95 6/15/95 7/31/95 7/31/95 7/31/95 7/31/95 8/1/95 Person Mayo Modeste Mayo Mayo Williams Williams Williams Mayo Neal Mayo Mayo Eaton Cheatham Eaton Hurley Mayo BT ntntxnnrFair Park School Relocation Business Case 12 Copy of map of Little Rock with Fair Park Elementary and other schools ShMiuiM hv O H*M* F MMIt BC nnuLDor 4 Jefferson School V\\ i I nr Liffie Rock Sc^i \\ \\  \\ ool District t) - urForest Pa ark School \\ \\ X \\ \\ ' \\ \\ \\ kittle S( \\North Little Rock School DistridC:\nA L net SchoolSl LqWil lams Magnet School: A A hall'High'dcho^ 1  . 2.7- I- r AIR PARK SCHOOL XJ I I J, 'School  r High SchooL X t W4 IHE B I- 630  J-kPulaskrHeights ^ulasl\u0026lt;rheights School) School i: tW 7 I LRSD Adm VS . e\nWoodruf \n I JJ School  r -rankkn InceritiveSch^ DrKingJntermsfrra^chow --L.rL. .Dr. King Interdistnc lanc .Qrhnnl-i-----\u0026gt; M I I I phens School LI 1,1 I -J i.rT~rT TTTT Dunbar Junior High School II i-i.i 1.1.j-m-iH I School iljbs Magnet^Fair Park. School Relocation Business Case 13 of pages from 1994-95 Budget relating to the cost of Fair Park Elementary School boMiMMd Or Hmn // RC FWKXXXX JMM 4Mni JMta JMM tMM dMfl Unit Func ObJ * Description Little Rock School District Department Budget 0023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY 1105 FOUR YEAR OLD PROGRAM _________________0 j j 0 REGULAR CERTIFICATED________ _________________0120 REGULAR NON CERTIFICATED ________________0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX__________ _______________ 0240 INSURANCE____________________ ________________0380 FOOD SERVICES________________ ________________0410 supplIes_____________________ 0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER____ ________________0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 0548 EQUIPMENT - SUPPLY CENTER 1105 FOUR YEAR OLD PROGRAM 1110 KINDERGARTEN _______0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED _______0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX_______ _______0240 INSURANCE__________________ _______0410 SUPPLIES____________________ 0412 LOCAL SUPPLIES SP TRACKIN 0416 SUPPLIES  SUPPLY CENTER 1110 KINDERGARTEN 1120 ELEMENTARY________________________ 0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0120 REGULAR NON CERTIFICATED__ 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE_____________________ 0326 REPAIRS-EQUIPMENT 0342 POSTAGE _______0360 PRINTING 4 BINDING-INTERN _______0410 SUPPLIES_______________________ 04 i 6 SUPPLIES  SUPPLY CENTER ______ 21 TEXTBOOKS - LOCAL SOURCES 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER _______0548 EGUIPMENT  SUPPLY CENTER 1120 ELEMENTARY 1124 ELEMENTARY MUSIC_________ 0110 REGULAH CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE Dale\n8/ 5/94 Page: 71 Prog: BUIXH)2 Actual 92/93 FTE 92/93 Budget 93/94 Actual 93/94 FTE 93/94 Budget 94/95 FTE 94/95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 'o^bo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,411.00 ___687.75 1,000.68 0.00 1,977.93 0.00 3,600.00 0.00 17,677.36 0.00 9,907^00 745.82 997.20 2^57265 2,849.80 209.03 245.13 918.07 18,444.70 1.00 1.00 24,089.00 20,066.00 3,190.73 3,315.00 5,400.00 3,233.00 0.00 3,600.00 0.00 62,893.73 00 2.00 300 61,488.31 4,703 86 3,081.67 256.47 0.00 0.00 69,530.31 406,546.70 35,187.90 33,793.04 25,237.13 2.84 282.92 109.00 605.15 __3i580,75_ 239^27 1,347.06 469.90 507,401.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 3.00 12.00 5.00 17.00 68,212.00 4^864.25 2,624.26 212.22 412.00 45.32 76,370.05 68,212.00 5,188.08 2,229.66 436.66 0.00 0.00 76,066.42 2.00 2.00 69.014.00 4,987.08 2,210.00 200.00 200.00 44.00 76,655.08 2.00 2.00 421,628.06 33,567.28 35,039.40 23,663.51 515.00 257.50 257.50 1,414.77 _____1,701.68 _____257^0 772.50 0.00 519,074.70 396,583.85 23,946.98 31,403.34 17,078.75 4.05 163.66 302.80 906.46 ___3,246.62 0.00 472.75 0.00 476,111.48 13.50 4.00 17.50 352,097.00 28,721.70 31,300\n44 17,127,50 300.00 100.00 96.50 ___1^200.00 1,700.00' 257.50 500.00 200.00 433,600.64 10.50 3.00 13.50 15.256.00 1,167.00 592.00 17,233.50 1,318.32 565.96 0.50 17,635.00 1,274.34 552.50 0.50Unit Func Obi ~ Description 1124 ELEMENTARY MUSIC J I 95 ACADEMIC SUPPORT PROGRAM _______0120 REGULAR NON CERTIFICATED _______0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX________ _______0240 INSURANCE__________________ 1195 ACADEMIC SUPPORT PROGRAM 1220 RESOURCE ROOM____________ 0110 REGULAR CERTIFtCATED _______0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX _______0240 INSURANCE_____________ 1220 RESOURCE ROOM Little Rock School District Department Budget Actual 92/93 0.00 FTE 92/93 Budget 93/94 I 17,015.QQ^T Actual 93/94 19,117.78 FTE 93/94 0.50 Budget 94/95 19,461.84 FTE 94/95 0.00 OOP O.PP o'po too too 10,411.00 796.44 1.292.94 12,500.38 6,246.71 45642 600.11 7,302.94 too too 6.246.6P 451.39 663.PP 7.360.99 0.60 0.60 14.392.56 1,101.13 765.59 16,259.28 tso tso 15,226.00 1,085.78 653.15 16,964.93 -30t452.00 2,046.64 1,117.86 33,616.52 0.50 0.50 -2200t00 1,806.84 1,105.00 27,915.84 t.oo too 1580 ACADEMIC PROGRESS GRANTS _______0117 STIPENDS______________________ _______0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX__________ _______0331 PUPIL TRANSPORTATION________ _______0360 FOOD SERVICES________________ _______0410 SUPPLIES______________________ 0540 EQUIPMENT-PERSONAL PROPER 1580 ACADEMIC PROGRESS GRANTS 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED _______0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED _______0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX _______0240 INSURANCE_____________ 1910 GIFTED AND TALENTED 2120 GUIDANCE SERVICES_______ _______0110 REGULAR CERTIFICATED 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX _______0240 INSURANCE_____________ 2120 GUIDANCE SERVICES 2134 NURSING SERVICES 0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATED ___________0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX________ 0240 INSURANCE__________________ 2134 NURSING SERVICES Dale\n8/ 5/94 Page: 12 Prog: BUD002 4,703.31 751.69 ___940.37 ____29.00 2,585.63 1,079.24 10,089.44 18,044.54 1,360.55 84579 20,270.88 26,719.00 2,043.86 1,518.67 30,281.53 12^44,45 1 j58.26 _L273.28 17,575.99 0.50 0.50 0.60 0.60 0.40 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0^00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OOP O.OP ____OjOO 0.00 3,222.67 4.426.44 7.651.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 ooo OOP 0.00 18,438.00 1,314.83 665.41 20,418.24 11,043.59 844.81 356.48 12,246.86 0.50 0.50 18,436.00 1.332.37 ___552.50 20.322.87 0.50 0.50 14,162.00 1,009.90 648.44 15,820.34 14J03,67 t139.61 1,089.98 17,03326 25.557.47 1,604.61 933.42 28,095.50 10^50.49 ___837.66 ___7009 12,489.09 0.60 0.60 0.40 0.40 32.058.00 2'.316.57 1.105.00 35.479.57 J5,432.65 1,115.19 331.50 16,879.34 1.00 too 0.30 0.30Unit Func Obj  Description _______2222 _ SCH^L LIBRARY SERVICES 0 i 10_ REGULA^ 5^'^7nCATEp noncertificated . -23i0_SOCIAL-security TAX _______p240_INSURANCE _______0410 SUPPLIES __________ ______0416 SUPPLIES  SUPPLY CFNTFB 2222 SCHOOL LIBRARY SERVICES -34ip__pFFIC^F THE PRINCIPAL 0116 REGULAR CERTIFICATED _______0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICAT^ 0124 CLERICAL OVERTIME_ ________0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 0240 INSURANCE___________ _______0410 SUPPLIES _______0416 SUPPLIES - SUPPLY CENTER 2410 OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL 2542 UPKEEP OF BUILDINGS ________0120 REGULAR NON-CERTIFICATFn 012 4 C LERI CAL OVERTIME__ 0210 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX ________0230 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIR^T 02^ INSURANCE 0321 UTILITY SERVICES-NATURAL 0322 UTILITY SERVICES-ELECTRIC _______0323 UTILITY SER-WATER/SEWAGE/ 2542 UPKEEP OF BUILDINGS 25^ OTHER SUPPORT SERVICES-BU 0416 SUPPLIES  SUPPLY CENTER Little Hock School District Department Budget Actual 92/93 FTE 92/93 Budget 93/94 Actual 93/94 FTE 93/94 Budget 94/95 FTE 94/95 40.513.26 12^69.00 -^^-237-^ 2.99007 2.090.80 ____180.95' 62.081.99 44.209.33 16.996.66 _________0.00 _____4^82.36 3.010.54 ________^95 _________0.00 68,925'66 ______0.00 1,964*69 ___698*30 1,686.60 _ 7,304.82 26*673.70 2,327.05 69.022.77  '  ---  . . . tel , _____ 1,9 I / .OO 2590 OTHER SUPPORT SERVICES-BU L9?7 6^ L91Z-66 0023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY 873.357.37 Dale\n8/ 5/94 Page. 7.3 Prog: BUD002 J .00 1.00 2.00 1.00 too 2.00 3.00 3.00 31.00 ___4t729.11_ ____6.698.61 ____2.804.26 2,732.79_ _______176.65 ______257.50 56,399.12 ____42,729.iJ ____12,983'00 4,622.20 _____2J75J0 2,043.39- ________184.16- 63.141.98 1.00 2.00 ______41.729.lf ______5J72^4O ______3.403^65' 1.547.00 _______1,141.00 t141.00 54.334.16 1.00 0.40 1.40 47,375.24 16,059.30 0.00 4,621.13 2,566.65 176.85 257.50 71,056.67 21,574.11 ______0^0 1,660.80 394.30 1,202.79 5,500.00 43,500.00 2,000.00 75,832.00 2.000,00 2.000.00 918.162.05 _46J2^9___ 31,731.99__ ____135^2___ 5,966.42 3,136.92 0.00 ______0^0 87,096.34 15,432.56_ ____780.21___ 1.240.28 167.45 1,06462 8,606.37__ 37,247.41 1,682.45_ 66,241.35 2.395.52 2.395.52 910.017.61 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 30.00 47,631.90 17,19465 0.00 4,664.49 2,21000 ____180.00 260.00 72,161.04 22,962.97 ______0.00 1.660*80 0.00 2,210.00 9,000.00 37,000.00 2,50000 75,353.77 2.000.00 2.000.00 904.418.87 too 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 27.80Fair Park School Relocation . Business Case 14 A possible scenario for relocating students !i\u0026gt;miiil0*. Hw P. WiMi Rc.ntntKJXv- Fair Park School Relocation Business Case 15 Possible Scenario for Fair Park Relocation 1. four-year-old class must be relocated intact or a plan modification must be submitted to eliminate this class. 2. Reassign the one hundred and thirty-two students (85 black and 47 non-black) who are not living m Fair Park's attendance zone back to their area school. 3. non-blacks) to reassign. blacks and 5 non-blacks) hundred and twenty-one students (99 blacks and 22 4. Encourage twenty-two non-black students to apply interdistrict schools. to magnet schools, or 5. 6. 1. 8. 9. Reassign 22 non-black students to Brady. Offer 99 black students seats in Incentive Schools. Encourage M-to-M transfers. Reassign zone blocks 511, 512, 513, and 554 to McDermott. McDermott current capacity IS 494 however, in past years it has been higher in to warrant an assistant prmcipal. Effect of Racial Balance on receiving schools: 3 a) b) Magnet and Interdistrict school's racial balance will remain the same. Brady's racial makeup will improve. Brady is currently 64% black and 32.2% non-black. The new balance will be 62.2% black and 37.8% non-black. c) McDermott racial balance wiU shift to 69.3 black if all former Fair Park black students transfer to McDermott. Student assignment must assign black students on a matching basis with non-black students to maintain the current racial balance within the affected magnet schools. ?iii\u0026gt;iiiui \u0026lt; W Or. Hrnn f WiUi m/()/ ir FimuniirFEB-21-95 TUE 15:55 SUSAN W WRIGHT FAX NO. 5013246576 P. 02 FAIR PARR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6\\6 North Harrison Little Rock, AR 72205 Ph. 671-6260 February 21,1095 U. 5. District Judge Susan Webber Wright 600 West Capitol Little Rock. AR 72201 Dear Ju^l^e Wright: The Faculty at Fair Park School asserts that we function In a highly productive manner and should remain a school family In the Fair Park building for these reasons: 1. We have a stable, Integrated faculty who work well together In academic pursuit. We work well together to solve difficult situations that arise with children. Teachers know the families of our children and provide food, clothing, love and a safe haven from gang threats. There Is camaraderie and we have little faculty turn-over. 2. We have worked toward the court ordered racial balance for years and years only to have the attendance zone redrawn and have our white children lost to magnet programs and adjacent area schools. We are the victim of unfair assignment practices. Over and over we have had to re-establish our credibility with new parents coming from new, sometimes far away, neighborhoods. The neighborhood surrounding Fair Park in Is transition. Older families are selling homes. We have an opportunity, again, to recruit new. young families. We are within 20% of our enrollment capacity. We need less than 60 children to meet our maximum enrollment.fiiti-iirys lut lOJbo bUbHN M WKlliHt t-fiX NU. bUlJ^4bb/b H. U3 if we are closed 2S2 children will be relocated adding to the confusion of the attendance zone charts and busing. Adjacent area school are filled to capacity and our white parent have said they will go to private schools if their children are bused out of the area. 3. We have had parents leave our school who have lost faith In empty promises of administrators to help us achieve racial balance and improve our school facilities. We were promised a new roof for a millage Increase, playground improvement when we were able to attain grant for playground eeiulpment, and a recruitment brochure to help to attract new families. There Is no new roof, parents left in the aftermath of the grant money bungle, and we still await a brochure. After ten year we did get new carpet last summer. 4. We have a faculty attuned to the needs of the many pedal, at risk children that attend Fair Park. We have 2 to 3 children per classroom on medication. This is disproportionate to other schools. Many teacher have advance degrees and pedal training In dealing with children with special needs. All of us accept children where they are academically\nabout one half of our beginner enrollment is below grade level. We work with these students through the grades until they achieve grade-level In sixth grade on standardized tests. In this arena, being a smaller school afford a limited environment that benefits our students. We commend Dr. William on hi choice of a principal for our school. Dr. Branch provides leadership for every facet of our day\nfrom academic through discipline, he Is a strong child advocate. He is a believer In conflict-management. He keep children out of resource placement and centers for the disturbed. He retiulres parents to be responsible for their children and take part In the child's behavioralFEB-21-95 TUE 15:56 SUSAN M WRIGHT FAX NO. 5013246576 P. 04 and learning program. He never raises his voice, he never shows anger\nhe Is a model of decorum. In the short time he has been at Fair Park we see a marked Improvement In our school climate and morale. This year he has been Instrumental In establishing a basketball team with cheer leaders and a Gentlemen's Club for at risk young men. Budget Suggestions The proposed budget says that w-e ivill save 1.1 million dollars by closing Fair Park and Badgett. We feel that is not true because our building contains asbestos that Is encapsulated and deemed safe In its present state. The expense of disposing of these toxic materials will discourage buyers. The renovation of this building for the IRC would rei^uire rewiring and changing the classrooms Into office space. This would not be feasible because of abestos contamination. The playgrounds would have to be converted to parking space since we have virtually none. An empty building or a storage building would encourage unsavory activities in an enduring, crime-free neighborhood. We suggest that In Heu of closing Fair Park, we prove that Abacus does not work and the system be returned for a saving of $500,000 to $\\.000.000 ^tlll owed. have the Josten's computer lab program which teaches and tests math and reading skills for all children In our building. It Is programmed to correlate with our district curriculum and the Stanford S tests. This could be used as a management program at no added expense to the district.FEB-21r95 TUE 15:57 SUSAN W WRIGHT FAX NO. 5013246576 P. 05 Conclusion appreciate that the Little Rock School District must make extensive budget cuts but preying on the most vulnerable schools Is not what the court has mandated and will not provide the necessary budget relief. Sincerely, THE FAIR TARR FACULTY C\u0026lt;4C Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham. Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 376-6200 Fax (501) 371 -0100 February 27,1995 Fair Park Elementary School Staff 616 North Harrison Little Rock, AR 72205 Dear Staff Members: I am responding to your letter on behalf of Judge Susan Webber Wright. Although she is sensitive to the concerns community members and educators have about desegregation and other educational issues, as a matter of policy. Judge Wright does not correspond directly with citizens. Instead she relies on us in her Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM) to discuss school matters with individuals and organizations. I am one of the associate monitors working at the ODM. As you are well aware, the administrative decision to recommend closing Fair Park is one part of the districts overall strategy to trim millions from the budget for the 1995-96 school year. While the superintendent has made that recommendation to the Board of Directors, no decision has been reached. The closing of any school requires court approval. Our office and the court will closely monitor developments to ensure that the districts actions comply with the desegregation plan and prior court orders. Thank you for taking the time to share your concerns with the court and this office. Sincerely, Margie Powell Associate Monitor LRSD P^AblT SERUICES TEL:501-570-4027 Mar 03,95 13:00 No .003 P.02 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANT SERVICES 3601 SOUTH BRYANT STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS (501) 570-4020 72204 TO: FROM: lol . Russell Mayo, Associate Superintendent 5Jgl^s C. Eaton, Director, Plant Services SUB J: SATE: Support Data I Pair Park \u0026amp; Badgett Elementary Schools March 3, 1995 meeting, please find enclosed the consideration that we used in primary areas of determining the renovation and IBS:! for Pair Park and Vadgett llementaV? support of our school closing initiatives. Schools in Upgrades, as defined for the context of this study, is orimarilv an evaluation based on what this Direetoraf a to :SiS:7?s\":cUS nire^tVrktnZeVs t^ie rch\"oi:S pyogj^am. Most of the upgrades deal with space expansions and administrative and media center areas trailer technology. Renovation is a J^mpUatlon of center areas. Renovation is maintenance and repair and new work items necessa^T to bring the consists, primaril^ .of roofing groSSS^kp^ovem^nt\n\"^^'\"\"\"\"' conservation, asbestos, and aadq^tt Flgpientarv school Upgrade Pro-iectsi 1. Expansion of administrative area $65,000 2. ,3. Expansion of the media center Additional classrooms $85,000 $75,000 TOTAL $215,000 Elgmentarv School Renovation Proients\n1. General grounds work $35,000 2. 3 . Waterproofing Window replacement and in-fill $35,000 $60,000 4 . New classroom lighting $85,000LRSD PLANT SERVICES TEL : 501-570-4027 Mar 03,95 13:02 No .003 P.03 5, Central HVAC 200,000 6. Playground enhancements $15,000 7 . Interior/Exterior painting $23,000 8 . Air conditioner replacement $40,000 9. Asbestos removal $244,000 TOTAL $737,000 FftlX Park Elementary School Upgrade Projects\n1. Fire alarm system $25,000 2. Classroom expansions/replaceraents $200,000 3, Grounds enhancements $$5,000 4. Administrative expansion $70,000 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. TOTAL $360,000 Park Elementary School Renovations\nGeneral work order backlog Roof replacement Boiler replacement Asbestos removal Grounds' enhancements Central HVAC TOTAL DCE/rlh/sd $20,000 $120,000 $85,000 $80,000 $15,000 $280,000 $600,000LRSD. PLANT SERyiCES TEL:501-570-4027 Mar 03,95 13:00 No .003 P.Ol LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL PLANT SERVICES 3601 SOUTH BRYANT STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72204 FAX (501) 570-4027 DATE: TO: FROM: Dr.'Rna^ll i^aij .)c\u0026gt;ug SENDER'S PHONE #! 5T0-40\u0026gt;Q SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS\nNumber of Pages (including this cover page) S Fax Phone Number V/) - 01 So  --- i J JUN- 8-95 THU 16:11 SUSAN W WRIGHT FAX NO. 5013246576 P. 01 June 5.1995 Hon. Susan Webber Wright U.S. District Judge SOO VJest Capitol Little Kock. AR 72205 OS Dear Judge Wright, On Thursday night June 1st, while Fair Park Schools PT A was awarding cert if Icates to parents and other VIPS for volunteer work In our school, the Little Rock School \u0026amp;oard met and discussed closing Badgett and Fair Park again. In February, the parents, the teachers, and the constituents AKA as cltlzens/tax p\u0026amp;nereNotere these two school communities made It very plain to the members of the school board and the superintendent that budget cuts should not Include these small schools. The vote was taken and the parents, the teachers and the constituents AKA as citizens/ tax payers/ voters of these two communities remember very vividly what that vote was: Ms. Linda Poindexter. Mrs. Judy Magness Mrs. Pat Gee Mr. Revin OMally Dr. Katherine Mitchell Mr. John Riggs W \"Yes\" \"No\" \"Yes\" 'Yes\" \"No\" The motion was dead as a result of that vote...and we rushed back to tell the children their schools would not be closed next year. Newsweek magazine. May 29,1995, featured \"WHAT WORKS, an article showing grass-roots solutions to Americas problems. One section. Jk 'Set High Standards,\" says just what parents, teachers and even the kids Kava been saying over and aver to board members and administrators:JUN- 8-95 THU 16:11 SUSAN W WRIGHT FAX NO. 5013246576 P. 02 Th* b*s^ way to impfomont d(p*ct*tions fs to I*t pHncip*fs Mid run thdr Mvn ochools minimal Interference from the central office. And the best way to keep that sens* of community is to keep schools smsn.\" \"difuill schools work bocau** they allow mor* ucc*** for parent*, stay maniigeaM* and thus s*f*r-nd most cruokil'-lot t**ohrs kn^ thoir students ov*r tim*\" \"Thtf inoet ImportuHt: yjirUikId in student nchiayenwit Is th* iz* of th* school,\" Fair Park and \u0026amp;ad^ett are small schools, they are safe schools and they are working.. Let the students have this stability. The boards vote to close. If Implemented, will wipe out many years of community work and dedication at these sites. Flease consider all our children and their schools across the city as the school board seeks budget cuts. Withjust four votes, they can eliminate entire school or^nizatlons. Which schools will they eliminate next? Sincerely, Fair Park Elementary School Faculty ^OtX Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 June 13, 1995 Opal Rice 5013 Stonewall Little Rock, AR 72207 Dear Opal: I am responding to the Fair Park Facultys letter on behalf of Judge Susan Webber Wright. Although she is sensitive to the concerns that community members have about the schools and desegregation, as a matter of policy. Judge Wright does not correspond directly with citizens. Instead she relies upon us in her Office of Desegregation Monitoring to discuss school matters with individuals and organizations. Since school had dismissed by the time we received your letter, I am mailing this response to your home. I was present at the school board budget session when the discussion of possible school closings came up once again. As Im sure you read in the newspaper account, the suggestion to revisit the school closing decision did not meet with unanimous acceptance. At this time, no action related to either Badgett or Fair Park is on the agenda for the June meeting of the Board. If the Board of Directors did decide to close Fair Park or Badgett, the district would have to present their justification in federal district court. The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has said that a lack of funds alone is not sufficient justification for decision-making. While it is certainly not impossible for the district to close schools, any such decision will be carefully reviewed by the court. Judge Wright has repeatedly admonished the Little Rock School District to remember their promises and commitments to the patrons. Thank you for taking time to share your views with Judge Wright. Please feel free to call me if you have additional questions or concerns. Sincerely, Melissa Guldin Associate MonitorOffice of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 376-6200 Fax (501) 371 -0100 June 13, 1995 Opal Rice 5013 Stonewall Little Rock, AR 72207 Dear Opal: I am responding to the Fair Park Facultys letter on behalf of Judge Susan Webber Wright. Although she is sensitive to the concerns that community members have about the schools and desegregation, as a matter of policy. Judge Wright does not correspond directly with citizens. Instead she relies upon us in her Office of Desegregation Monitoring to discuss school matters with individuals and organizations. Since school had dismissed by the time we received your letter, I am mailing this response to your home. I was present at the school board budget session when the discussion of possible school closings came up once again. As Im sure you read in the newspaper account, the suggestion to revisit the school closing decision did not meet with unanimous acceptance. At this time, no action related to either Badgett or Fair Park is on the agenda for the June meeting of the Board. If the Board of Directors did decide to close Fair Park or Badgett, the district would have to present their justification in federal district court. The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has said that a lack of funds alone is not sufficient justification for decision-making. While it is certainly not impossible for the district to close schools, any such decision will be carefully reviewed by the court. Judge Wright has repeatedly admonished the Little Rock School District to remember their promises and commitments to the patrons. Thank you for taking time to share your views with Judge Wright. Please feel free to call me if you have additional questions or concerns. Sincerely, Melissa Guldin Associate Monitor'Z'I-IS' FROM THE OFFICE OF STUDENT ASSIGNMENT BADGETT AND FAIR PARK INFORMATION On June 22, 1995, the LRSD School Board voted to close both Badgett and Fair Park Schools. Pending court approval, Badgett students, including 4 year olds, will be reassigned to Washington unless they elect other choices. Fair Park students residing north of 1-630 will be reassigned to Brady. Most of Fair Park students living south of 1-630 will be reassigned to Franklin. A portion of students living south of 1-630 will be reassigned to McDermott. Four year old students currently assigned to Fair Park will be reassigned to Bale. Student Assignment Office personnel will conduct a meeting at each school before July 20 to explain other choices students and patrons may make. Letters explaining reassignment and the date of each school meeting will be mailed no later than July 10 if the court has approved the closings. Students assigned to Badgett and Fair Park that do not reside in the attendance zone of Badgett and Fair Park will be reassigned to their attendance zone school.(lap. NOV -2 1995 'J LD Otfice oi Ds5S3rC,ajO:i wi\u0026lt;3r,.icrhii IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION '^^GTc.Rn CJ3' 'iC'AKKy^.'-i'SAS 2 4 1995 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff, vs. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL., Defendants. * * * * * * * * k * * * No. LR-C-82-866 Sy:_ Vf^^'UHrwACK, CiEnK CLShk J^-McS IV. I, i ! ORDER Before the Court is the motion of the Little Rock School District (\"LRSD) for modification of desegregation plan, filed on June 30, 1995. At that time, the LRSD was seeking the Court's permission to close Fair Park Elementary School and Badgett Elementary School beginning the 1995-96 school year. The motion is now moot, the LRSD having withdrawn the request. Also before the Court is the motion of the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) for approval of new school sites, filed on July 21, 1995. The PCSSD was seeking the Court's permission to build a new Daisy Bates Elementary School and a new junior high school at Crystal Hill. This new construction, as well as the purchase of computers for use by fifth and sixth grade students in the PCSSD, was to be financed from a millage increase the PCSSD intended to ask the voters to approve. Because the PCSSD determined not to ask for a millage increase, the motion for new construction is moot. 2 5 6 6Because these motions (docket entry # the Clerk is directed to 2432 \u0026amp; # 2443) are moot, remove them from the pending motions report. SO ORDERED this day of November 1995. ^iTED States otsTRiM\nIiT JUDGE n-ns DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET IN COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 56 AND/OR 79(a) FRCP ON lANCE 2 BY_i 2r i'L 53 'i\nc-! 'C I IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION i,: r: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF OS\n- Ci\n-- VS. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. INTERVENORS JOSHUA INTERVENORS' OPPOSITION TO LRSD'S MOTION FOR MODIFICATION OF DESEGREGATION PLAN AND JOSHUA INTERVENORS' MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THEIR REQUEST FOR THE LRSD TO SHOW CAUSE WHY IT SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT The Joshua Intervenors supplement their inital objections to the proposed 95-96 budget of the Little Rock School District with respect to the closing of Fair Park and Badgett Elementary schools and further reguest that the Court reguire the District to show cause why it should not be held in contempt of court for its June 30, 1995 request herein for modification of the desegregation plan. For its supplemental motion, Joshua states as follows: 1. The motion as made by the District is not in compliance with the Court's order of February 8, 1995. Parent involvement was minuscule. The District failed to \"solicit and sustain community involvement\". See Court's order p. 6. 2. The motion as made by the District is not in compliance with the directives of the Court with respect to involving the Joshua Intervenors in the process. Joshua was not involved inthe process. 3. The motion as made by the District is not in compliance with \"milestones'* of its general implementation schedule. 4. Student assignments have already been made without court review and approval. 5. The implementation activity stands to disrupt student assignments at other schools. 6. The plan forces mandatory attendance zones upon the pupils of the closed schools contrary to the desegregation plan, and it treats them differently from other students who had choices of schools, interdistrict. Incentive and magnet. Wherefore, the Joshua Intervenors move the court to disallow the proposed budget changes which would close Fair Park and Badgett Elementary schools, to require LRSD to show cause why its actions are not contemptuous, and for special enhanced counsel fees for Joshua's counsel for this action. Respectfully submitted. John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR (501) 374-3758 72206 By: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I do hereby state that a copy of the foregoing was hand delivered to all counsel of record on this 6th day of July, 1995. Jimmie Lou Fisher Treasurer of Sfate State of Arkansas Office of the State Treasurer Telephone: (501) 682-5888 RECESV^n Fox: (501) 682-3820 S. Jill I 0 1995 Ofiics of Desegregation Monitoring The Honorable Susan Webber Wright 600 West Capitol, Room 302 Little Rock, AR 72201 June 27,1995 '-'DDgp- Re: Fair Park and Badgett Elementary Schools Dear Judge Wright: Please accept this letter as a request to give serious consideration to vetoing the Little Rock School Board's recent decision to close Fair Park Elementary School and Badgett Elementary School. My niece attended kindergarten at Fair Park Elementary School during the 1994-95 school year. Her parents, like many others, had several educational options available to them but chose to support neighborhood public schools. I was pleased with their decision and our familys experience was a positive one. As an elected constitutional officer, I am fully aware of the monumental task of balancing constituents needs with fiscal responsibility. Although I have not had the opportunity to fully study the complexities of this issue, I believe closing these schools should be considered only after all other options have been exhausted. Thank you for your time and consideration of this matter. Sincerely, 11 lie Lou Fisher I Treasurer of State 220 state Capitol Building  Little Rock, AR 72201 JIMMIE LOU FISHER TREASURER OF STATE 220 State Capitol LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 P\u0026gt;M i I r\\ V 27 JU I? , I OF 4 eq:- HoiiAirii- The Honorable Susan Webber Wright 600 West Capitol, Room 302 Little Rock, AR 72201 llu.lul,l.,l.lll...........IIIhI.I6-27-95 5L!SAN 'A. jUN 23 1995 Judge Susan Webber Wright 600 W Capitol Room 302 Little Rock, Ark 72201 OlSiGQ Of 0 199S u. S. DISTRICT JUDGE ^^^9regsiio ^oniiorin^ Dear Judge Wright: Since you have heard Fair Park Elementary School is up to be closed for 1995-96 School year. I am a concerned parent of Adrienne Abraham, she entered Fair Park School 19.94-1995 School year. done well at Fair Park. Adrieene has Ms. Lewis really works well withthe children, in a Quiz Bowl held for Kindergarten pupils. Mrs. Lee Lewis, was her Kindergarten teacher. Adrienne won a trophy This was the first time a Quiz Bowl was held for Kindergarten students and I was honored that Adrienne got a chance to participate. Adrienne received 1st place in the Quiz Bowl and a letter from the gifted and Talented teacher thanking us for working with Adrienne. Dr. Samuel Branch is a good Principal and Ms. Baker is a good Secretary at the school. Fair Park teachers are always having good learning material sent home to help the students advance themselves. work close with the children. The teachers really she helped Adrienne a lot. I was really pleased with Ms.Lewis, Adrienne attended to 5 yrs. old. at the age of 2 how to tell between animals. Headstart helped Adrienne a lot too. Headstart from 3 yrs. I taught her her shapes, colors and tell the difference My son Edward Jr. is 4 and just graduated from Headstart and I had enrolled him at Fair Park for Kindergarten and now they are closing the school. We had gotten the assignment that he had been accepted. I hope that we can still get a chance to send our children back to Fair Park School. I really like the location, the security it has for the children. Dr. Branch would greet the children on the parking lot each morning and if he didn't another man would (teacher), just hope something can be done to save the school. I Sincerely, Mrs. Queen Abraham Parent of Adrienne A. Abraham former student of Fair Park Mrs. Queen Abraham 5816 West 14th Street Little Rock, Ark 72204 r  .rM '7 .. usaG PorUS.\u0026lt;Wa\u0026lt;Jy Judge Susan Webber Wright 600 W Capitol Room 302 Little Rock, Ark 72201 72201-3323 01 .....\n\n,ll.l.l.\u0026gt;ll\u0026gt;llt\u0026lt;\u0026gt;llHll\u0026lt;HllRECE'V ID i JUL 1 W5 Office of Desegregi^OT Moniiorinj,! June 27,1995 District Judge Susan Webber Wright Federal Building 600 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Judge Wright The ruling of the Little Rock School Board to close Fair Park Elementary School has not only upset me as a teacher in that school, but I feel that the parents of the children have been lead down a path lined with hidden meanings. Our parents have only had one school meeting to voice their concerns and wishes for their children. It was my understanding that the court desegregation plan was to involve the parents at every step of the decision making. Please allow our parents and faculty to continue as one family. We are making such progress with all our children. With the addition of the 4yr. old classes, we have had parents select our school because of this class offering, and the schools central 1ocation. Now these new parents are told the school that they have chosen is closing and they will be sent somewhere else. Maybe to a school that is too far for the parents to provide transportation. Before even entering the Little Rock School System the parents are already met with a change. This is not a good way to build faith and unity with our new parents. I know you have always put the children first. Please do not let the district use the children as a guick fix for their problems. Sincerely Mrs. Valerie Kodell PreK Teacher, Fair Park3 / P-O. 8ox Or. UX21 b /(j ($~q/ '\"tier C/ ' 7 ': '\u0026gt;  J Z-aj') , 1 I cc'fcmf !^(/ Ccypr/^r -^.--) O I 14514 Woodlawn Little Rock, AR 72205 June 25,1905 Honorable Susan Webber Wright U. S. District Judge \u0026amp;00 VJest Capitol Little Rock. AR 72205 RECEIVED JUL 10 1995 ^557? OF JUW 28 J9g^ Dear Judge Wright: Office of Desegregation Monitoring s. Q'Strjct- 1 am a first grade teacher at Fair Park Elementary. 1 could not attend the court session today because of work responsibilities, but 1 have a story for you about the specialness of our school and our principal. As a first grade teacher I keep an eye on the kiddles in the up-coming classes. Last year one of these kindergartners passed me in the hall, running so fast that I saw only flying sneakers as they bounded through the door, out the building, and into the street. His flights became a habit. The principal sent him to a special school where he could receive intensive counseling. When school started in August, the fly-away kid was back and appeared on my class roll. Timothy had not changed. He rackd thrdughthe halls into the street. He circled the classroom, eyeing, hitting, pushing, kicking. He walked on desk tops. He frightened my students. He trashed the room. Sometimes without warning, he was goneinto the hall, out of the building. Our new principal. Dr. Samuel Branch, set up procedures and began working with him. He enlisted help: nurse, counselor, aides, custodians and finally his mother\nshe came to school with him, every day, all day. He continued in therapy. v\u0026gt; Teachers in the north wing, Timothys hall/runway, worked with him. He had to walk the entire length of that long hall after lunch recess to get to our classroom...and eventually he did walk. He stayed in the classroom without his mother at his side, though she was still in the school. He was able to talk about, admit to, and change poor behavior. Sy the end of school, this cooperative effort produced a calmer student who was reading and writing. He was working well in his math class. He took a healthy pride his academic achievement. On the Standford \u0026amp; standardized test, he did well, but scored high above average in decoding words. As he reads his way through the second and third grades with that exceptional decoding ability, his comprehension skills should reach the higher levels. With continued nurturing, this child , a black male, has a future... 1 dare believe, a great future. This is the strength of our faculty. We work together. Many of us have been here a long while\nthere is little teacher turn-over at Fair Park. We respect each other\nwe help each other. This is particularly important since about 70% of our students come from low income homes where their opportunities have been limited. Though Timothys need was is greater, we have other children from the inner-city who need a special touch. Our smallness works for us, not against us, as we reach for de-seg goals. As principal. Dr. Branchs first priority is the child. His leadership provided opportunities for my student to claim his potential in the first grade. Because Timothy lives north of 630, the district plan would place him next year in another area school, with no special services, but with twice the enrollment. Will he have the environment he needs to continue to flourish? The Fair Fark family is a good educational team. Please let us exist. Sincerely, Anne Riley FIRST GRADE TEACHERANNE RILEY 4314 WOODLAWN LITTLE ROCK, AR 72205 t i , E -USA-G --S- FoiU\u0026amp;oUfcaaonlr HON. SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 600 WEST CAPITOL LITTLE ROCK, AR 72205 Hill ll.uluhluUlluul.lulHlIe  RECEsVED c ? CHAMSERS CS=' SUSA\u0026gt;^ JUN W'yCHT 1 1995 .'III 1 0 1995 Office of Desegregation Monitoring * U. S. DISTRCT JUDGE ? iLfiJeZz^ 2^ ,?Z2z)L ,. Cf^C/a, f-IL{ i 4 -yj L,/'\nLv-^ JJ' K^ c^ /xii'-fn IU.Q, ?^ /\n. y/iu Xt: ij^/5vUpJp^ J --I_^/ W iua.tUCa4tM*u- ^aa^5V-l) i I R D I K.95 RS RECEIVED Office of Desegregation Monitoring CHA?- =? SA'' JERS-c,.,.,  .SiEP 'VRl---' JUN 30 '995 Jill to 1995 j. s. nu- , n  June 23, 1995 Office of Desegregation Uunnormg district JUDCc I am writing on behalf of my son, Christopher Stron i\u0026gt; \u0026gt; in reg ard to the Fairpark School closing. We are a Caucasian, middle class family with both parents working. Speaking on behalf of myself, I will do whatever it takes to send my son to private school rather than sending him off to wherever! When the rumors started about the cidsing I worked in the back ground calling and writing the Governor, the Superintendant, Vice Superintendant, and School Board members. When I phoned the Superintendant's office to ask about the status of the closings, A woman working under the Superintendant informed me that they handle the majority of situations, and if they could not, lie would. I explained that this was the worst time to threaten a school closing being that it was- registration for private schools and the majority of Caucasian families, like us, would probably pre-register their children for private schooling. She replied that this was probably their purpose of submitting the proposal at that time. We are the last of a dying breed of Caucasian's in LK Public Schools. There aren't probably even 20% Caucasian pupils in Fairpark, but I know for sure after the attitude of LR School District in any number of circumstances, my child will be in Private school. 3o I would assume the purpose of LR School District is to remove the existing Caucasian pupils out of the Public Schools. When you ask someone a question as to \"What is the status of the Fairpark closingi' and the reply is that more than likely itwill close, is aggrevating. And the only reason for its closin 2 is to cut the budget. Our school is in a wonderful neighborhood. These children come into our commumity with absolutely no fears of the outside world, which the majority fear in their own neighborhoods! They can learn and play without thinkin o about o angs and drive-by-shootings, and personally I don't have to worry about my son's well being while he is there. This enables me to perform better at my j ob. My son is two blocks away from my home, if need be, I can be there in a minute. He is an asthmatic and time is everything! Whenever there have been any questions about anything they have always kept me on top of it. I'm a mother who wants to know my child is okay mentally as well as physically and he knows that if he needs us, we're only a phone call away! So please, take into consideration our children and their parents and keep ''Our School Open. Thank You, / Cathy Strong 613 N. Pierce Little Hock, AR 72205 ()I3 W-Pierce /je.nrkS. . E='h^- / } is ) '\nleKoJJ 'BuLGizAft lj\u0026gt;C)O Copt+cUL UZ. Fklc 73SOJRECEiVED JUL 1 0 1995 Office of Desegregation Monitoring \\Jo _t\u0026lt;AKH^ (\u0026gt; CMOti (2CrQAfi: ^395 ________dL'.am n)V^d/Uiv\u0026gt;__ (J)\u0026lt;y\n^ CCC^IU)^d-.UC^ .oatoji.^ Cem de)d _Umt |awtbnb__ bchA)o-|ia%j. to2\u0026gt;. 6p^ 0mxiAc/i Cjno. UTV boiri- iMo iJjIj JoQklW . W..__ ! UOs^Cenc^ do r Clad- QMcU^ _Z]QQn_tdf2dQiC^ -dtu/) (kkKi UviiL. coo^ Cmb kUo LaoC^iM lAH ______ L^vom .dOMlII I I I I I 1 I I i I I I (oCD LC. t.: I i lory I i 1 tCZboto\n^ U3w*2j^ 7226 ( f I I I I I I I IRECEIVED Jill 10 1995 igr@gation Monitorii^ Otfics Of Oessgragation M( 3 0 1995 ^-\u0026gt;1'  Q.CC9. ) ^17U\u0026gt; f // 1 -7 7'n ' 9, 1 I // 0^. y/L L . ft/, A 7. . _________ \u0026lt; m--^i I I I 1 I I I I I C ?' i ' I I t I I u I ^'TcTr V ---------- \\/3S5 I ! j. OIJGlory X\\xSlbH-(\u0026gt; Colk'ctmy ^ N^t(Oh\u0026amp;l St\u0026amp;tic . d'vuaunly qJ- 1REC Si MIL JO 1995 QIS' ^UH 0 'gai: EZCjE-m. cd '1 , ^4(Cbi Cl (O11 laLu-^I l. cn t- eVt C r, f /I -h^ b Ua r \u0026gt; Hr. Os? A L, 0 L \\z( r. .  dtctu dL hod Q du^r^cdim dl. .zrvL..4^iAjZ?L d\u0026lt; bOctV CXjorVynp. SjV CXju^J ^.Ca UO 4v \"tC , td SrLC5uJ-d (Xv^d SJcg_ IO r 4-C/ynp. CLcjz-xAXiaJ SAj ibuL^Aru^ -CS rvcCLb'de ijr Xc t-C yxx^ rdo^ -tkCt. tAjuc- Gd- pooCL. SV Idbe^i +vJci  E SrtZ^ pcvJO v^AUbixi-d (JL Ct-A^A \"''^^cxjrid '-pcx'tbb e4\\^\u0026amp;nKje k\\\u0026lt;iuJr LUi- kj2J43''tV^ SZLmI f tr^ 'ICTTYA R- ip C^WcLc ^lQ- dUudU/vJ\" i34tAA-fi_ CjL CCrr\\ \\/ (sSaAXvU ^1 \u0026lt;O_ ' H uCuJ^ aX^vul^ n\\jJUC\u0026gt;K^ td tzUC\u0026gt;UJV^ \"X VO^^^viici HE^ pX-CbO d^rAJD -J b (q^zT^ ^^Ovc'^uAuc 3 \u0026lt;3.3 ij^aJj 7^^C)\u0026lt;/ / i J \"saSSJ^, C::^ 600 LjO. \u0026gt;a,rece^veb,^ .111 1 0 1995 JLifJ Ci 0 J99!:, Monli^l  Jt lUGE ^bddy AbbcL Azoid . dbud ^0/9^ Mta^sd ''^0 J ! J t J d/ L . /I I .\"] / /1a/ Al JlA d-d/dSil dJiLd. ddaM .LdiLtMjb ib dlUv TgA ddbioA '^9LGJJJ i/lbb^ ______ /xd AtCb d799M d AcbU ^bj7d 4ajo^AA A .do .d^VLidC Mzbibd^ db _ dMcy pod-b-d/PU \\ dl\u0026lt;do j\u0026amp;) ^adC cdc/.\u0026lt;j^ / CM6/ldjLigtd, -6hj^ jbdjoo, ibb dlbud JjOMdl diet Jto^ '7 GjjxjJ - A'^d TAdu/ywndu)ib : diA AnaJd /b\u0026gt;oz -i)wi^ LQ) Jdad)^5 ddJio\u0026amp;J ^WM' (^JidcLuiyd^ ihdd Vujio! dkd -90 'OZIA-^ i 1^blddd(jfifu^^ ddiv3- y^/vud^ (DuAjLL/id \\ . / l\u0026lt;) /I/O (j ,da(A/(/.JIB 1 0 1995 - - wr/ght Office of Desegregation Monitoring  M. JOOGc June 27,1995 The Honorable Susan Webber Wright 600 West Capitol, Room 302 Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: Fair Park and Badgett Elementary Schools Dear Judge Wright: Please accept this letter as a request to give serious consideration to vetoing the Little Rock School Board's recent decision to close Fair Park Elementary School and Badgett Elementary School. During the spring of 1994 our family was recruited by the Little Rock School District and Superintendent Williams to enroll our daughter in the public school system. During this time we were also highly recruited by the staff and parents of Fair Park Elementary. After careful consideration, we decided to enroll our daughter in Fair Park Elementary. Throughout the 1994-95 school year, our experiences with Dr. Samuel Branch (the principal), Mrs. Lee Lewis (our daughter's teacher) and the entire school staff were only positive reinforcement of our decision to place our child in her neighborhood school. She excelled in her first year of school\nin fact, she was one of the seven winners of e Kindergarten Quiz Bowl. You can imagine our dismay when we learned that the School Board had voted to close our school on Thursday, June 22, 1995. We must admit we do not understand the complexities of operating a school district. However, as a family, we do understand a budget and \"living within our means\". The School District contends that it must eliminate a ten million dollar ($10,000,000.00) deficit and that closing Fair Park and Badgett Elementary Schools will save two million dollars ($2,000,000.00). It is tmclear whether this savings is \"gross\" or \"net\", assuming it will cost the surviving schools additional money to accommodate the increase in students. It is also unclear what additional cuts will be made to eliminate the eight million dollar ($8,000,000.00) balance. As a family we have found that we can balance our budget and live within our means without eliminating necessities, or some luxuries, if we will be disciplined in our spending and work toward defined, realistic financial goals. It seems that these principles would work equally well for the School District. The equitable solution is for each school to absorb that portion of the deficit equal to its' percentage of the overall operating expenses of the district.The Honorable Susan Webber Wright June 27, 1995 Page 2 The Little Rock School District caimot expect parents to continue to support the district if it cannot provide a stable learning environment for the students. The Little Rock School District cannot expect taxpayers to continue to support the district if it cannot balance its budget and responsibly manage the resources already available to it. The Little Rock School District can expect voters to reject a school board and administration who are not up to the task of providing a stable learning environment on a balanced budget. Thank you for your time and consideration of this matter. Sincerely, Rhys G. and Debbie Lynn Rogers 7404 M Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72207Mr. and Mrs. Rhys G. Rogers 7404 M Street Little Rock, AR 72207 I The Honorable Susan Webber Wright 600 West Capitol, Room 302 Little Rock, AR 72201 JIIhI.I June 27, 1995 SUSAi CHAN-igEHS J!-' V JUN 30 199 Michael Sewell 905 N. Taylor Little Rock, AR 72205 Susan Webber Wright 600 West Capitol Room #302 D Little Rock, AR 72201 ,1111 1 0 1995 Dear Ms. Wright Oftice of Desegregation Monitoring I am writing to in regard to-the potential closing of Fair Park and Badgett Elementary schools. I am a single parent of a child attending Fair Park and the PTA President for the school year just ending. Of course I am corresponding with you because I do not wish to see Fair Park closed. The school board has given the parents of these two schools the false sense of security that they would be spared at least another year. Doing this by voting against the proposal at least twice during the school year. I feel that it was, to say the least, underhanded that they chose to meet and vote again on this issue after school was dismissed for the summer (less opposition). It is my opinion that our schools were the least likely to cause major repercussions than closing a school with more influential parents. The reasons given to the parents for the proposed closing were basically two reasons: a) Costs to maintain the facility (repair/replace roof and air conditioning) b) Below capacity attendance and low in-zone attendance. As for the two reasons above I respond with these facts / comments: Under the new proposal the Fair Park building will still be utilized for teacher training. that the repairs would still have to be made. This would seem to me Regarding Fair Park being below capacity, this is true\nbut, that is a Selling point for me. I am in the process of trying to acquire information regarding enrollment, at all Little Rock schools and the individual facilities date of construction.Again, I contend that these two schools are targets for cost savings due to the fact they are less volatile in respect to attendees. The below in-zone attendance is in part due to the fact our school is located only a few blocks from a private school. If we were to look into it, I'll bet that the public school attendance in the Pleasant Valley area surely shows similar data due to the private schools in that area. It is very disappointing to me to see our schools closing! The main problem causing the financial woes of the Little Rock School District are plain to see. Declining attendance is the number one cause. fears of big city violence! Why?? Parents the problem is racially motivated. Yes, it's true to that some of Parents are being forced to send their children to schools across town, even though there are schools possibly across the street from their homes, what to do. People do not like to be told The violence found here in our city is frightening, however, it is something that the people of the community will have to face up to. create the gangs. It's our problem. The education system did not In fact I give them credit for trying to make the schools safer through the hiring of security guards. Unfortunately, most of the problem centers around the home. There is a school approximately six blocks from our home\nbut, my daughter will not be allowed to attend this school even though there are students that are considered not to be in-zone attendants going to this school. (Again, not fair.) I do not want to appear so negative, but I am. There are good things that have come from our small schools. A better education. Big is not necessarily better. If our educational test scores were compared with other schools, I think they would prove it. (I'm checking) Fair Park, in case you didn't know, is composed of a seventy- five percent black student body. I am white and this is not a problem for me. Most of the children come from lower to middle class families. white neighborhood, school than others. Our school is located in a mostly This is a more racially integrated I have been told by various members of the faculty that Fair Park has been used as a dumping ground for undesirable children (learning problems) from other schools. Theseteachers have done an outstanding job and I am proud to be a part of the school. If Fair Park is closed, I and my daughter are going to move out of the Little Rock School District. fact. I do not want to do this. This is a simple My daughter is an honor student and enjoys where she is at\nbut, if it's not going to be there next year, neither are we. Please consider all factors carefully before making your decision to close these schools. Thank you for taking the time to listen. Sincerely, Michael Sewell 11 i j I RECEIVED JUL I 0 1995 n 3jg1^ (A\u0026amp;cr\ne of Desegregation Monitoring feCLy U ' CCL^ cWC. 20 MckM \"?9ao) ( RECEIVTED 'J^I~-__3 1995 a DISTRICT judge .? plour {icmr I J f)l^ G^koc J 6:X^- Cc^ C\u0026lt;9y\u0026gt;^^c( Jcj(J i\u0026gt; .. loUj .. GJ /^yA A^cay^jK^-Ata yT^yyo.- A___ re^tii/K . .6d^ t i Ji I - I- / jCb JM... (AcjZlj/j \\ (joh . ........... t _1 f. ~ Z /n( t K . i f K I I , 1 I I t- I Ly.... -. /14J.-h-bA.e^r ____ ^iZrCrdz^ __________' ...hjZ (Stict p-CXt .....GiEsu^dl i'-'C . QlLr'.^___ d xi\u0026lt;^ A\u0026gt;... hpOruJ h^ d'bD diyccbci Mvfc -ter fWl\u0026lt; .... .BSuCr.^J .__74^t\\A fi_..^._.p,6LM?^.ar^.. d'Csd^_ .Gxf_ ^0-^y) /Oiy^c. __ ____ j^L.,_)e44:,Lci-...kcdd^-fe.-Ch^^... __ \u0026gt;^JjLadL^._.21dita.. 4\nC^ ' fJchscQ .e ^lJQ\u0026lt;Aid3XiZ\u0026amp;^Ui._X2Z-^ I  . i drv^__pr^ fe^ _____ AlfclfeCu. W-igjko^^ L UXlu^/t!^ ^-Ze ^^3z_. I I i j I\ndxredb M rcLLf- ftirk JJn-y^ i ! -er !yVGjfcKx\u0026lt;-(dn . J / \\ ,0 (^4: fdLcr- r^^Z/v . .OpTcOveJ^ e a ..aU cLdrUL- ny^Azuri: ccA ( , , ty (Se2Zc^j,\u0026gt;^,v,.4_\u0026gt;^\nx34 ' ijCiiO^ r , K\\d^v'C 4 ^V \u0026lt;i LtCk%^- raJXbs A)\u0026amp;h [M-f of,, Clluv zrfti^k'eU Lo^^d [ { L^da -tS4-a/- cJufW llOe\nth /)(' L ,C^A ^XAj2. ...J Lk ._ 4.- L ^rh*^ f\\dppeK/ii^j o/- C^ecjui^  .bdkbe^^ Orel 44^^^ dd-Q\u0026lt;^ - ICC^L^ fd(d^xL //LQZXC^ C^~C^ /\\Ji^uydp^^-ic::~... J f \u0026lt;d ,_J Ke4^ .p i i [i \"l ! rCuSl^Y- lo^ ____ ')^^JU.do VjCAjc h /yd dO-Li, GJIa (dc^ 3 d c^d aya^ td.  i(^GA\u0026gt;e^_ , (5^ - '^ - (jJLyKi\\eAji, I A, odnM-J I idP-Sb , / ... y'~^b Cs^cjxr^d ..-Qe bcdlj^c,, Tr ii', (~Pt\u0026gt; a/KyK!i._ _ b culci' -fc^ hcOj-cfc-C' , fr :kfe.3 ...bU'L^iJ.^.RC -^fcCLi--Zh\u0026lt;rS( 2-.__A.idv\\-. J, ,LCt\u0026lt;U=i-cf 7^^ .(\u0026gt;S^..3Z^--i:S^:L:Ck^Q^ .____ AjL^\u0026lt;jWg-r h\\\u0026lt;ao\u0026lt;^ roxCiifit __LtKZfck__ fCf\\QJuO IX. ______ ^ho Vg,^ \u0026amp; ox tk /)r)\u0026lt;xc dbTfr/di-. 1. a 1 .. /.._ 7 L d^ -____^ocd- _____________________________ , [\u0026gt;\u0026amp;Q:'(4X...C'r:r...(j-J'XCh L^CC'^rt^^L. V'J\u0026lt;?'3.. dbsa^c^, J^..b:\u0026gt;di...l ojo-k.^H-jCC^c . T1^ b c.tX-r'd bbxi J L^a/jL\u0026lt;A 6-pr^t Ai' i . dArtkcid bj}, I\\ fKbU a dlttbi i Jc^disLcJ c:^ D_ _ _ dchy^ \"two ZqZ-\u0026amp;^ (X^.\\ichJ- b^ 0\u0026gt;La 'bbot ,^jri-oXi-^r- u\u0026amp;tib bra k? LC f .i^C^Ctn ITJL /^^'p(3b''^ pC^- . ^c-/LCck 1^\nu Jio J^-ix sa.i/e^f) O ! I ZC-fT^f-Zx) --r- 'f/ - -------_ . ...jiQ I i)C^CL\\dc- ZiXiX f -. end ad/xiu /'ZdJ-dbyZ- f I I ,. I,--. i : i I ^-r\u0026gt;..^ dOZ^ Cydl FTA /^Z/ RECB 1 Jill 10 1995 Office of Desegregation Monitoring ''^ Qc 'vfeit \u0026gt; dDor^ 3oX p)ck AF. UcttLT -^/oPOO 79301 .. 3 1995 '^^I^ISTRICTJUDG^ fhjA name fn^ 15 Hid ba S/\u0026lt;^ai3, Aq h (P'f\\dl Oo^joF-c '^l,ZaFd-k CwvvL\u0026gt;n4-^ Obtio/^O {^(/uuc [FrF ((S^e/Q-fcL^  Fcouf Pa^rl\u0026lt; J-'^ /-S Soc/o\u0026lt;^e 'h oar hOu^S '/5 a sma/l ^d^ool c^/H ^oocf S^Carib(^\u0026gt; ^l/Zah^'k teezi h^ lO(2Aej^^6i/d /6aS' Abro^d^ro( Fs^  \\/^wjl g^ctrs. 2^- /)Or hX\\je^ o2 /^/rd a. (AF sdooJi (2coru\u0026lt;sL ^Q^/ OAT/C/ dcF s/} '' ' \u0026gt;0- Sho /s do(F^ l/dM (oao , (^rc\u0026lt;i^S(a.rd (dojos/^ caa\u0026gt;^ /s d-o (2^ Feu^ 2 / ' n. 'WC^ ijOtd^d rndriklj^'^'^t /Ww yJ- dd\\i\u0026amp;i boa/id /Ty^^k-e\niJhu (?^i^i?y'Ci oe. CjciuJ^o^ ipQj-i-ffc/ wv Sl^(J3/U^, fkdlbA S4\u0026lt;i-rri5 ^SIQ^ fWfi-jl^^ Av\u0026lt;\u0026gt; i-^AR -)S-^i)^I ! Fair Park, Badgett at top of the list for possible closing BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazette Education Writer Fair Park and Badgett elementary schools may close permanently at the end of this year to help the Little Rock School District balance its 1995-96 budget. The district must make S8 million in cuts to balance its budget. Dr. Russ Mayo, rAAansasDemocrat (bazette FRIDAY, JANUARY 27,1995 associate superintendent for desegregation. said Thursday that a number of factors, including enrollment, were considered by administrators in identifying schools that could be See CLOSE, Page 9B | TZTose  Continued from Page 1B shut down. District administrators will discuss the future of the two schools at two upcoming community meetings. The first meeting will be at 7 p.m. Tuesday at Fair Park. 616 N. Harrison St. in the north-cen- trai part of the city. The second meeting is scheduled for 6:30 p.m. Feb. 7 at Badgett. 6900 Pecan Road, near Little Rock Regional Airport. -Adams Field. Badgett and Fair Park are among the smallest of the districts 35 elementary schools, with official student enrollments this year of 177 and 282. respectively. Besides enrollment, other factors considered included the physical conditions of buildings. the cost of potential re- Mayo said. taries are filled to capacity Closing the two schools could Closing Badgett also save the district up to $900,000 creates some reassignment challenges next year, Mayo said. .4 more ac- because the nearby schools are curate estimate will be avail- magnet schools, most of which able once final decisions are are filled by student application made about where students at and not based on attendance the schools would be reas- zones. signed. The savings would come  - ,  -------------- All of our planning to this from reducing the number of point was based on a scientific principals in the district and the approach. Mayo said Thurs- building operating costs. The day. \"From here on out. we will district also may be able to re- duce the number of teaching positions. 'All of our planning to this point was based on a be considering emotions. The final decision on whether to close the two schools will be made by the Little Rock School Board when board members decide this spring on a budget for next year. Mayo said parents SCienttjic approach. From and other community members will have time to make their here on out, we will be considering emotions.  Dr. Russ Mayo feelings known to board members before decisions are made. He said he and other district staff members will be available ~\nto answer questions about the Closing the schools could af- recommendations for closure. pairs and renovations, the feet more than just the families adaptability of buildings to support modern instructional programs, the number of children in a school's attendance zone, the schools racial composition and the ability of the district to successfully recruit children to the school.  When alt the factors were combined. Fair Park and Badgett were at the top of the list, with children in Badgett was one of 14 schools the two transferred to the Little Rock schools, as attendance zone district from the Pulaski Coun- boundary lines for other ty Special School District in schools may have to be modi-  . ------- 1986. as part of a federal court tied, Mayo said. Decisions on order that extended the bound- those possible changes havent aries of the Little Rock district been decided. to the city limits. One of the problems admin- The county district had a istrators face with closing Fair Badgett school for many years. Park is that nearby schools like The school was first named Forest Park, Jefferson, Pulaski Frasier Elementary in honor of Heights and Williams elemen- a former principal. In 1926 it was renamed Badgett for the township where it was. A new Badgett was built at its current site in 1964. The schools capacity is about 250 students, according to a February report from the federal Office of Desegregation Monitoring. This year. Badgetts enrollment is 75 percent black and 25 percent white, which is out of compliance with federal court guidelines calling for a 60- 40 racial ratio. About 64 percent of the Badgett students live in the Badgett attendance zone. Fair Park, which was opened in 1927 and has a capacity of about 350 students, also is out of compliance with the racial balance guidelines. The enrollment is about 72 percent black and 28 percent white this year. The school was expanded in 1951 and renovated and expanded again in 1980. About 57 percent of the Fair Park students actually live in the schools zone. The Little Rock district has closed other schools in recent years. Ish Elementary was closed in 1992-93. Stephens Elementary was closed this year but is to be rebuilt When the new. larger Stephens School is opened in 1996-97, the nearby Garland Elementary will be closed.Arkansas Democrat \"^(azcttc WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 1995  3B Parents plead for Badgett school  LRs best-kept secret ( BY CYNTHIA HOWELL community members and stu- boundaries to the city limits. As '  a result. Little Rock got 14 dents was unconvinced. One by one. audience mem- county schools. If you dont want us. Ill bet the county will take us back. Badgett Elementary is the ----------- ------------------------------------ Little Rock School Districts bers described the community . best-kept secret and doesnt school as a place of safety and .--------------------...  deserve to be closed, parents racial harmony, where their said Jodi Crowder, whose chil- ' and community members children are shown love and dren are the fourth generation  pleading for the schools future concern by longtime Principal in her family to attend the i told district administrators Mary Golston and her staff. school. ...................................... \"Tuesday. The parents are pleased The tiny school near Little with this school and feel it is Rock Regional Airport, Adams the districts best-kept secret, ' Field, is one of two elemen- Claude Johnson told district ad-  , taries the district may shut ministrators. If other parents down next year in an effort to knew about this school, we trim $8 million in expenses. wouldnt have any trouble at- Dr. Russ Mayo, associate su- trading students here. perintendent for desegrega- Parents said that parents tion. said at a meeting on Bad- who tried to get their children getts future that closing the into Badgett were told by the school and Fair Park Elemen- districts student assignment Look at downsizing the administrative operation, anoth- er audience member said. Take it off the top. Dont take it from the children. Shiem Swift, a Dunbar Magnet Junior High student who attended Badgett, said the elementary schools teachers are willing to help students  even to walk them home if necessary. Jerry Peters, director of the Little Rock branch of Webster University in St. Louis, accused the district of picking on Badgeit because its in a working-class neighborhood with little political clout. Breaking up a successful team of parents, staff, students and community would be a mistake. Peters said. Webster University is Badgetts business partner No final decision has been made about closing Badgett and Fair Park. That will be left to the seven school board members  four of whom attended the meeting Tuesday  later this spring when the 1995- 96 budget is prepared. No final decisions have been made about where Badgett children might attend school next year. Washington Magnet Elementary and Clinton - Magnet Elementary are possibilities. Mayo said. tary, located in north central office that they couldnt, even Little Rock, could save the if they lived in the schools at- school district about $1.1 mil- tendance zone. lion. Enrollment at the school We have too many schools was 279 tn 1988-89 but is down ,.for too many children, Mayo to 177 this year with only one 'said, adding that the cost of class per grade. renovating Badgett so that it The Little Rock district ac- could support modern educa- quired Badgett in 1986 from the .tional programs would be pro- Pulaski County Special School hibitive. District under an Sth U.S. Cir- . But the crowd of more than cuit Court of Appeals order ex- \"  grandparents, panding the Little Rock district 3 '100 parents,FRIDAY. FEBRUARY 24, 1995 CoovTiBht  Lrttls Rock ifw Backers plead for Hillcrest school 8Y CYNTHIA HOWELL Oefnocrat-Gazette Education Writsf Advocates for Fair Park Elementary School pulled out all the stops in a campaign Thursday night to convince the Little Rock School Board that their Hillcrest neighborhood school shouldnt be shut down. Parents and a student offered testimonials about the scnools importance in their lives. Teacher Opal Rice spoke about staff unity and commitment. Wally Lovelace, a real estate agent, told the board that people ask to buy houses in the neighborhood so their children can attend the Fair Park. And neighbors talked about the hazards an empty building would pose and the school playgrounds conve-r nience as a neighborhood FAIR PARI^ QDISrr c  n r-. Aransas OomocfaiXSazenafOavwj\npark. geta 'sZA^fKn SPIRIT -H Fair Park Element School cheedeade-s An- ' ilarB opalerda sm efrmombe rps ahreenatrsd s^imd- LaSonySa cOhg^lei sBboyi u. - parents and neighbors of Badgett Elementary School, which may also be closed ne.xt year, and from advocates for the district's school nurses program. main open before the Uttle .ro\n^ Sch^TBoarS'^m^Ung^n^^ rtg^ In all. more than 30 people came before the board Thursday night to defend programs rrojeciea cn^nT TI\" 'losing the cut uo the district can--------- projected S9.1 million deficit from its 1995-96 budget. Projected cuts include erase a two schools. Cuts  Continued from Page 10 sharply reducing the early childhood education programs, hiring a private company to run the school buses, eliminating grants to the area schools and cutting 19 nursing positions. Board members made no de- CKions during a lengthy meeting Thursday on the cuts. .Another budget work session is set for 5 p.m. Tuesday. Im here to represent the students' views about Fair Park. fourth-grader Deanna Jones told the school board. .-And we we say keep it open. Our school is not fancy and could use a little fixing up. but we like it just fine.  Diane Nesbitt, a parent at the school, gave the board petitions, signed by 900 people, to keep the school open. She also presented the board with a large red cardboard hean. covered with photographs of Fair Park children. Dont break our heart! Nesbitt told the board. Parents from Badgett Elementary. located in extreme east Little Rock, described the school as a place of comfort, love and safety for generations of children. They said its a school where the principal greets children when they get off the buses and teachers come out of the building to talk to parents who drive up to the school at the end of the day. If its not broke, dont fix it Claude Johnson told the school board, speaking of Badgett. We dont need your help. We are asking you to back off and leave us alone. Were doing just fine. .Also making appeals Thursday were:  Bus drivers who oppose hiring a private company to run the school buses.  Advocates for the 19 school nurse positions.  .A member of the advisory committee for the community education program at .McClellan Community High School. Kelly Tucker asked the board to consider some changes in the program but retain it. Bus driver and parent Michael Campbell told the board that inefficiency in the transportation department is at least partly the result of old. deteriorating buses. In regular business Thursday, the board stopped short of authorizing the formation of committees to research how close the district is to complying with desegregation standards set by the U.S. Supreme Court. See CUTS, Page 90 Superintendent Henry Williams suggested earlier this month paying seven committees of employees and citizens to do the research as a way to accelerate an end to the 12-year-old school desegregation lawsuit Board member John Riggs IV made a motion that e district ask U.S. Di,strict Judge Susan Webber Wright for a conference to determine whether the committee approach was an appropriate way to work the district out of the case. Wright decided earlier this week to call such a conference, .tiu Brown, desegregation monitor. said. Brown had told Riggs of the judges intentions Thursday. The board also:  Gave conditional approval to establishing a city neighborhood alert center at Ish Elementary School.  .Approved eliminating the learning foundations course at Pulaski Heights. Forest Heights. Southwest and Cloverdale junior highs.' Arkansas Democrat 7^ (gazette SUNDAY, MAY 7, 1995 CATwwiaht O I ll Q\u0026lt;v*b NMrtrMTWn I nr Fair Park kindergartners bowl quizzers, parents over BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazette Education Writer Dont try to sneak anything by the kindergarten pupils at Fair Park Elementary School Theyre small but smart. Just ask their teachers, who staged a quiz bowl Friday for 14 of their young charges. Two hours and 175 questions later seven of the 14 children still standing and had missed a single answer. were not It was amazing, said Nona Whittaker, a teacher of the gifted and talented at the school. We had parents and school board members here to watch, and some of the parents were crying. The seven winners were AdriAbraham, enne Aldridge. Brooke Jordan, Sharon Leakey, Evan Nesbitt, Mattie Rogers and Jessica Webb. The quiz bowl questions in mathematics, science, social studies and trivia were provided by the Little Rock School District s office of gifted and talented education. Do you know which state in the United States is an island? Or how about, which U.S. president freed the slaves? What organ of the body pumps blood? What is the difference between fiction and nonfiction? If you have five pieces of candy and give two away, how many are left? And can you name the individual Ninja Turtles? The Fair Park Seven didnt even break a sweat as they responded to those questions asked by Catherine Gill, the schools former principal, who was serving as moderator. My objective was to teach I the children how to compete J and how to accept winning and 1 losing, Whittaker said Friday : after the contest. The pupils  prepared for the contest for  Qumcy about six weeks. Whittaker worked with them 30 minutes week, and the children practiced at home with their parents and in their classrooms with two teachers, Rebecca Brown and Lee Lewis. a Whittaker learned a few lessons on her own as the result of the quiz bowl. Primarily, don't underestimate children. She did and had to go out Friday afternoon to get more trophies.Letters Arkansas Democrat $azcttCj MONDAY, JUNE \"'2,1995 .--------------------uni.. Rock Inc- Keep Fair Park, Badgett schools I I On Thursday night, June 1, while Fair Park Schools PTA was awarding certificates to parents and other VIPS for volunteer work in our school, the Little Rock School Board met and discussed closing Badgett and Fair Park agcdn. In February, the parents, the teachers and the constituentsa.k.a. citizens, taxpayers and voters of these two school communitiesmade it very plain to the members of the school board and the superintendent that budget cuts should not include these small schools. The vote was taken and the parents, the teachers and the constituents remember very vividly what that vote was\nLinda Pon- dexter, no\nJudy Magness, yes\nPat Gee, no\nKevin OMalley, yes\nKatherine Mitchell, yes\nand John Riggs, no. The motion was dead as a result of that vote, and we rushed back to tell the children their schools would not be closed next year. Newsweek magazine for May 29 featured an article showing grass-roots solutions to Americas problems. One section says just what parents, teachers and even the kids have been saying over and over to board members and administrators: The best way to implement high expectations is to let principals and teachers run their own schools with minimal interference from the central office. And the best way to keep that sense of community is to keep schools small. Small schools work because they allow more access for parents, stay manageable and thus safer, andmost cruciallet teachers know their students over time. The most important variable in student achievement is the size of the school. Fair Park and Badgett are small schools, they are safe schools, and they are working. Let the students have this stability. The boards vote to close, if implement^, will wipe out many years of community work and dedication at these sites. Please consider all our children and their schools across the city as the school board seeks budget cuts. With just four votes, they can eliminate entire school organizations. Which schools will they eliminate next? J OPAL RICE Little RockArkansas Demixrat fSTtOazcltc   WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 1995  Transit, fate of schools top agenda BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democral-ORzette Education Writer After months of discussion, the future of two Little Rock elementary schools and the district's trniisporinlion department could be decided tonight by the Uttle Rock School Board at a special meeting at 5:30. The meeting's agenda says the proposed 1995-90 budget will be discussed. But board members said Tuesday they expect to vote on closing Badgett and Fair Park elementary schools and on hiring a private company to operate most of the school bus system. Those moves are designed to help the financially strapped district cut expenses for the coming school year. Both proposals have been defeated before. The board deadlocked 3-3 in April on a proposal to close Badgett, in extreme east Little Rock, and Fair Park, in central Little Rocks Hillcrest neighborhood. The schools are among the district's smallest, need renovations and are under-enrolled  Badgett with 177 pupils. Fair Park with 282. Closing them could save $1.1 million next year, district officials have said. But staff and parents of children at the schools have begged the board not to close them, saying their smallness means more individual attention for pupils. Earlier, board President Linda Pondexter and members Pat Gee and John Riggs IV voted against closing the schools. Katherine Mitchell, T. Kevin OMalley and Judy Magness voted to close. Afier that, a seventh board member, Stephanie Johnson, was appointed to the board. Johnson has declined to say how she might vole. District administrators are expected to make a presentation tonight about school bus services that Laidlaw Transit Inc. could provide. Last year, the board rejected a proposal for privatizing the bus system but let district officials ask for bids from companies again this spring. District bus drivers oppose privatization and have proposed their own changes in the transportation system to cut costs. The Laidlaw proposal would save the district nearly $700,000 next year and $1.4 million over the three-year contract, according to school district officials summary of the contract provisions. Laidlaw, based in Ontario, Canada, and Cincinnati, Ohio, is the largest transit company in North America. It transports 1.8 million students a day in 40 stales provinces. and five CanadianSATURDAY, APRIL 27, 1996 LRSD board to mull fate of school LRSD  Continued from Page 1B Instiuctioti Resource Center Fair Park Elementary on agenda for Monday BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazette Education Writer For the second time in as many years, the Little Rock School : Board will consider removing i Fair Park Elementary at 616 N. ! Harrison St, from the districts ranks of regular schools.  ! Board member Judy Magness\nsaid Friday she will propose : transferring Fair Park pupils to ! other schools next fall and using the building to house the Little Rock School Districts Instructional Resource Center. Fair Parks fate is expected to be discussed at a special meeting at 6:30 p.m. Monday. The board also will consider other budgetcutting proposals and could vote on some of them. According to state law. any teachers and administrators who might be laid off or transferred because of budget cuts must be notified by May 1 of potential changes in their jobs. Converting Fair Park to the Instructional Resource Center could leave some children attending schools closer to home. Magness said. Money that would usually be spent at Fair Park could be disbursed to other schools, she added. And rather than being shut down and boarded up, the Fair Park building, in the Hillcrest neighborhood, would be used daily by Instructional Resource Center employees, who include the districts curriculum supervisors. The center now operates in rented space at Sixth and Ringo streets. The board voted earlier this month to move the center to the vacant Ish School at 3001 S, Pulaski St, and to relocate the Little Rock Adult Education Center from East Side School to the vacant Oakhurst School at 4800 W, 26th St. ! Some of the staff members at the Adult Education Center have objected to moving to Oakhurst because of the buildings deteriorating condition and poor access I to public transportation. Magness suggested that if the See LRSD, Fige 7B moves to Fair Park, the Adult Ed ucation Cenler could be put al Ish. At one point last summer the school board voted to close Fair Park and Badgett elementarie,s as a money-saving measure. But the board backed away from that move in a deal with civil rights attorney John Walker. conditioniiig systems. The consultants also found that the cafeteria, kitchen, library and office areas were small and inadequate. Other budget ending strategies to be considered by the board Monday include reorganizing the districts administrative stall, hiring a private company to operate buses for special education students, staggering school starting limes for more efficient use of buses and reducing junior high schools seven period class days to six class periods, which would Walker had threatened to pur sue a contempt of court motion against district olficials for violating their school desegregation plan in planning budget cuts. Fair Park is one of the district'.s smaller schools, with an en rollment of 270 this year. It was built in 1929. A facilities consultant last year ranked the school 33rd out of 35 elementary schools, citing its lack of handicapped accessibility and its need for new interior finishes and plumbing, heating and air reduce personnel costs. Other proposals include reducing administrators annual contracts by one month and eliminating a centrally located truancy center, where Little Rock police officers can deliver truants. The district is projected to generate S148 million in revenues next year, but expenses are projected at $151 million. The board must cut at least $3 million to balance the budget and more than that to give employees a raise.9 ?. 3 s- 5\nP s s-gss^g gftiS'SwS^'fDe sOsihi? B-sg-s u O o 3= fD o Q \u0026amp; g ft ? c = r* (t\u0026gt; 1 o o g\u0026amp;g-g a rt\u0026gt; OQ S' .. w \u0026amp;s v\u0026gt; o o (/) 9 Q 3.2 S- Cl'S 0 8  li? 2- 3 E 3173 \" fe!\" bIsb n-- ES8 w j: o o w 2- S 2 5- 2. g-^Sg.S\n3 w p'S S p  g-R \" CTj? WO g o J\" '\u0026gt; f/j  tr S^s B.'S 3 5 3. g  - I Arkansas l\u0026gt;nuKrat 'arnuclle  TUESDAY, APRIL 30, 1996 Saved again, Fair Park stays open Budget constraints ax 40 Ll\u0026lt; teachers BYCYNIHIAIK)WELL Uonioemt Unzollo EfiuenUon Willot ' Ijittle Hoek's Eair I^ark Elementary tSebou! seems to have almost as many lives as a eat. After a lengthy discussion and pleas from seliool supporters, the Little Hock School Board voted S,,og!5-'^  C- o ='^^gSP-K\nS3,gg.,g-^ 2 V) ft \u0026lt; 3 'IQ n O  i-b -  o 3 3 \u0026amp;  x* i,s.t cn 1^?-? s S- 2 o 8 S S ffi 2 ? ---------------------3 2-3 ! ** s ' dQ. P .. f* a SBe.9SsS-^^ = S|.5' 9 2. ^3 222PPFJ'OPp2. c-B-ffg- G-| g.a P- H c-xa Y- s322,o_cxg-Q . .Saglgg-g\"- so\u0026amp;S.si^ BaSaEo-S ,g  R  s S' fjq 3 . wj ta \u0026gt; ri' cr O S-g s s s w c a o w o o a o a   \u0026gt; d P 3 CT O G. w (t 9 :sa j: CH xJSjq ET'S 32.S 2.3 5  S S o H sBss 3 w a. \u0026gt;5 Q ft - (T\u0026gt; S'^S^-g-gSa 2 o . - 2 w O 2 ST \"g--#. SEB re \u0026amp;^ao.S 2-as-. 5? ^r\n_  ft aj \u0026amp;  3 \u0026amp; 9 o ft O 2 j= 3 S.  2. IS w B 5 c 2 FT ft $0 5 \u0026amp; ft , ft w C/l 2=0 ^5^2,5 o 3 p-aa 2? 3 2. 'P S. P u a unanimously Monday night against closing the small school in Moiidny H ex ft C -rJ O  3 H o ,1= c B g g g ,, Hw'ft cu^'9 ex 5' CTK \u0026amp;5I E \" r- 8 2 9 H r' - \u0026amp; \u0026amp; O n? -a tP E= Ft- ri. OS S CD s a ^90 o 3 ft jq 2 . j: t- o. 3 S-s -^s t/) HO. o- y P - , c* , ro o wS.tawP ?T s-s 51 s etc  a sg O , J . 30 B-S l.fO o O ij. Ct ft -* \u0026lt; w o !9S'g'S'^K'g3n\u0026gt; OSBog.-g s ^S--WWF-p w^ohssL. S =1 5 3 '2. g 5  _  CW a 8-7 3 (Z\u0026gt; B O \u0026gt;4 2E.' 2-2.0 .3 \u0026amp; ff cr !:r 3 rt tj o 3\n w s s.'* B S ft cn o  0-0 ft\u0026gt; 9 cr 3 S'- ft B' P o o- 3 Is gg o B the Hillcrest neighborhood next year, but warned parents and neigliborhood leaders to find ways to increase enrollment. In other business at a budget meeting Monday, the board approved about $1.6 million in cuts for next year to balance (lie districts $146 million budget, 'fhe cuts include\n 40 leaching positions at a savings of $1.1 million.  $200,000 in unspecified administrative costs.  $267,(MK) in student busing costs.  A 20 percent  or $25,0(K) cut -- in employee car allowances. Employees whose jobs will be eliminated or changed will be notified by certified mail by Wednesday, as reiptired by state law. The board voted against making some controversial cuts. Besides choosing not to close Fail- Park, the board voted against hiring a private company to operate its transportation system for handicapped studenis. At SupcMiiiteiulenl Henry Williams recommendation, the board also deeifhd against reducing the seven period class day in secondary schools Io six periods. Such a move would have saved mhney but refluced shident (tp- portunities to take elective courses. ' rhe board also voted against consolidating the administration of (he early childhood program and the Home Instruction Program for l^re-school Youngsters. Both programs serves preschoolers  one at school, the other in the home. 'Hie board s vole on Ealr Parks future was the fourth in two years. Aller school district adminis- Iralors recommended closing the .school last summer, the board voUkI to keep it open, voted a few weeks later to close it and then reversed itself again in a deal with civil rigliLs lawyer John Walker, who was seeking a con- tempt-of court citation against the district in U.S. District Court. Board member.Indy Magnes.s proposed Monday that Fair Park pupils be reassigned to other schools, some of which would be closer to the children's homes. She said the building could be used to bouse the district's In- strudionnl Resnnice (Y'liter, made up of the districts curriculum supcuvisors. file ceuler is now in rented space but is slated to move to the vacant Ish School file father of a Fair Park child S00 ClfTS, Pag 8BArkansas Democrat (i^azette  SATURDAY, MARCH 11,2000 I J Pupils father attacks teacher in classroom Teacher Debbie Cothran told officers that about 2:05 p.m. the father of a student hit her face with his fist. Cothran had a bruise on the right side of her face, police said. The man attacked Cothran and threatened her after getting into an argument with her about her treatment of his daughter, police A parent observing a classroom said. The attack was witnessed by Thursday at Fair Park Elementary, ' ___ 616 N. Harrison St., attacked a the schools principal and an en- teacher, a school employee told tire class of prekindergarten stu- Little Rock police. dents, police said.May 3. 2 0 0 1  FRIDAY, DECEMBER 14, 2001  Parents plead cases, but two schools stay in budget axs reach LR board hears of virtues of smallness, then adds Fair Park to possible closures BY CYNTHIA HOWELL ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE Faced with the possible loss of their neighborhood schools next year to budget cuts, parents and others from the Badgett and David O, Dodd elementary school communities Thursday extolled the virtues of their small schools to the Little Rock School Board. Board members were sympathetic and made no final decisions. However, by the end of the meeting, the School Board not only directed Superintendent Kenneth James to continue planning for the possible closing of Badgett and Dodd as a way to save about $1.7 million, but also asked him to prepare a feasibility study on closing a third small school. Fair Park Elementary at 616 N. Harrison St, where about 200 pupils attend classes. The presidents of the parentteacher associations from both Dodd and Badgett presented the School Board with petitions Thursday pleading to keep then- schools. Were going to refuse to let Dodd close, Tiwana Noon- er, a parent of three Dodd pupils, said. Were going to fight. Dodd parents and community members pointed to the number of grants that the school has received in recent years to restructure the way reading and language arts are taught. Those The district is getting $2.4 - - - million less in state funding this grants and programs may not\nyear than initiaUy budgeted be- all be transferable to other cause of shortfaUs that were announced last month in state tax collections. That loss is expected to be carried forward into the next school year when the dis- schools, they said. Additionally, they argued that the specially trained staff members will be scattered across the district, diluting the effectiveness of their training. Diane Krippendorf, a community member, also pointed out that as many as 200 new homes are planned for the Dodd attendance zone, which should boost the schools enrollment over the next few years. District officials said the new homes might bring in 14 to 20 new children for the school in each of the next two years. James has said that the possible school closings are just one See SCHOOLS, Page 9B Schools  Continued from Page 1B area for potential budget cuts, and that he and his staff are preparing recommendations for more reductions. In response to School Board members who said they cant decide on closing schools without knowing what their other options are, James said he will give them some proposals after the first of the year. James, who has been Little Rocks school superintendent for about six months, just last week raised the issue of closing one or more of the district's smallest schools next fall as a way to help offset escalating costs and a declining revenue forecast that is already affecting the districts $224 million budget. trict must meet contractually obligated teacher pay increases. According to preliminary - - - plans, Badgett pupils would be The School Board must make assigned to Rockefeller and a decision on the school closings Washington elementary schools, by Jan. 10 to be able to notify Charter school pupils, who at- affected parents of the changes tend the school by applying, before registration starts for the would return to the schools that  2002 school year. That regis- serve the attendance zones in i tration period  when parents which they live throughout the can make a variety of school district. choices for their children  begins Jan. 28. As for Dodd pupils, they would be divided among West- James repeatedly acknowl- ern Hills, Romine and Otter edged that the district is decid- Creek elementary schools if their ing the issue on a very fast time school is closed, line that is contrary to districts  Two bands of small children policy that calls for school clos- set the tone for Thursdays meet- ings to be considered for at least ing, marching in two circles on 12 months, except in emergen- the administration buildings front steps, waving posters and James assured the board that chanting in support of their is entering dire financial straits, schools, as board members ar- You dont take the largest cut rived for the meeting. Dont in state aid in the history of the close Dodd school, yelled one state and think it is business as group. usual, he said. Please dont close Badgett Badgett and Dodd are targets school, the others said. for closing because of their small enrollments. Badgett, at 6900 Pecan Road near the citys airport, has 153 students in its regular program and another 80 enrolled in the districts charter program, which is housed in the same building. Dodd, 6423 Stagecoach Road, has 188 pupils, which is 69 percent of the buildings capacity. The average elementary school in the district has about 360 students. The district would save $536,048 by closing the regular Badgett school and another $479,669 by closing the charter program, plus $738,909 by closing Dodd. By closing the schools, the number of teaching positions in the district could be reduced by about 20. A similar number of support staff positions also could be reduced. District officials speculated, however, that most of the people in jobs at the affected schools could be absorbed into other schools as vacancies occur because of retirements and resignations. IGroup sounds cry to protect LR elementary Dodd, 2 other schools futures on line as district makes cuts  MONDAY, DECEMBER 31, 2001  BY AMY SCHLESING ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE Theres a battle brewing in the Little Rock School District over a proposed death sentence for one of the districts smallest and highest scoring elementary schools. The Little Rock School Board will decide Jan. 10 whether to close David O. Dodd, Fair Park and Badgett elementary schools to help balance an overdrawn budget. While parents of students at all three schools dont want to see the doors close on the neighborhood schools, one - e . u I X rr trict average and have been the group of parents, school staff redpients of several re- and rf-al pcfafp npvf InnArc hac . and real estate developers has launched an organized campaign to keep at least one of them open. Kathy Porfiris, organizer of the letter-writing campaign to save Dodd Elementary School, has rallied the parents, neighboring real estate developers and staff of the school to fight to keep it open. Little Rock School Board member Baker Kurrus said the issue isnt one of conflict  its one of economics. \"Theres not a fight to close Dodd, and there's not a fight to keep it open. Im not going to fight with anyone. Im going I to focus on giving our kids the best education possible, he said. Porfiris said her efforts are on behalf of all three schools proposed for closing, but said her heart stays with Dodd Elementary School, since it has been the education base for all four of her children. Her youngest, Jimmy, is a fourthgrader at the school. Dodd is at 69 percent capacity this year with 188 students studying in classrooms built to hold 271 students. Those students have literacy scores that exceed the discent grants, the largest of which is a $150,000 Comprehensive School Reform Development grant from the Arkansas Department of Education. Judith Yeager and Barbara Kennedy, administrators of the state grant program, wrote a letter to the School Board, praising the achievements of Dodd Elementary School. Dodd has an outstanding [kindergarten-fifth grade] literacy and technology program in place due to the restructuring made possible by the CSRD grant. We do not feel that it is a wise use of taxpayers money to See SCHOOL, Page 2B  I School  Continued from Page 1B spend $150,000 of federal and state funds to successfully restructure a school and then have the Little Rock School District Board decide it should be closed, Yeager and Kennedy said in the letter. When the School Board meets Jan. 10, however, the deciding factor will be money, not test scores. Superintendent Kenneth James said closing Dodd, Fair Park and Badgett elementary schools will help offset a $2.4 million cut in state funding the district had counted on for the coming year. Closing Dodd and Fair Park will each save the district $700,000 annually and Badgetts closing will save another $500,000, James said. The movement of charter students back to their neighborhood schools would save about $480,000, for a total projected savings of $2.4 million. Its always hard to close schools, James said. \"People are very close to their schools and I understand that, but regardless of what happens here, its still my job to bring ideas to the board on how to make cuts and balance the budget. James warned that a larger cut j in state funding could happen after the new year if the economy remains on a path to recession. Couple that with salary obligations, and weve got to make a minimum $6 million cut to balance the budget, he warned. The schools are targets for closing because of their small enrollments and high per-student costs. Badgett, at 6900 Pecan Road near Little Rock National Airport, Adams Field, has 153 students in its regular program and another 80 enrolled in the districts charter program at the site. Dodd, at 6423 Stagecoach Road, has 188 students. Fair Park Elementary, off Kavanaugh Boulevard, has 200 students. Those displaced students will be distributed throughout the district. According to preliminary plans, Badgett students would move to Rockefeller and Washington elementary schools, with the schools charter students returning to the schools in their attendance zones. Dodd students would be divided among Western Hills, Romine and Otter Creek elementary schools. The district has not discussed a moving plan for Fair Park students. Porfiris organization will meet with the School Board Jan. 7 in a last-minute effort to influence their Jan. 10 vote. Tlie board plans to bring the principals from the other schools that would absorb the Dodd, Fair Park and Badgett students if the schools are closed. It almost sounds like they have their minds made up, she said. Id really like to think that we have a chance and not just blowing in the wind. Kurrus said he has gone to great length to inform people that school closure is no more than an option at this point. I dont think anybodys made up their minds. Weve got to do something, we cant just afford to ignore that we will lose revenue while our expenses continue to climb. But were considering different options, not just closing schools, he said. If the schools are closed, it will affect more than the students. Porfiris said new housing developments near Dodd Elementary will suffer with the loss of a neighborhood school. She has recruited Becky Finney, a real estate developer with Rainey Realty to fight the closure of Dodd. Pecan Ridge, Tall Timber and Kenwood subdivisions have expansions in progress. The School Board estimates those growing subdivisions would increase Dodd enrollment by up to 20 students next year and 15 students the following year. Kurrus said nothing is off limits for balancing the budget. The one thing he deems sacred are teacher salaries and raises. To have the best teachers, I feel that we have to reward them financially, he said. Kurrus said streamlining the districts administrative process, ending property tax breaks as corporate incentives and get the district out of court over desegregation are all good options for balancing the budget. Porfiris is banking on alternatives to save Dodd. And if it comes down to fire the caretaker, heck, well come up there and mow the grass ourselves, she said.J a n u a r y 3. 2 0 0 2 District sets sessions on closing 3 schools AKKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE The Little Rock School District will hold a series of public meetings, beginning today, at three low-enrollment schools under consideration for closing. The meetings are scheduled at:  Badgett Elementary, 6900 Pecan Road, 6 p.m. today. J  Dodd Element^, 6423 Stagecoach Road, 6 p.m. Monday.  Fair Park Elementary School, 616 N. Harrison St., 6 p.m. Tuesday. The meetings-are open to the public. The district proposes closing schools beginning July 1 because of state budget cuts. The Little Rock School Board will consider the proposal during its regular meeting Jan. 10 at 5 P- p. at the School District headquarters at 810 W. Markham St.H Si 75 LR parents face closing of 3 schools pl hl T Arkansas Democrat-Gazetle/STEPHEN B. THORNTON Badgett Elementary School parent Jerry Peters (left) Zeigler (center left), Rockefeller Elementary Principal asks Little Rock School Superintendent Ken James a Anne Mangan, and Sadie Mitchell (right), the districts question Thursday night during a public hearing at associate superintendent for school services. Mangan Badgett to discuss the school's possible closing. Lis- and Zeigler attended because Bad^tt students tening are Washington Elementary Principal Gwen would attend their schools if Badgett cl^es. Badgett meeting held\n2 more set BY PATRICK HEALY ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT (JAZFITE As solemn-faced parents, teachers and administrators discussed the fate of Badgett Elementary School with urgent voices, the children played. Arm in arm, they pranced across the schools packed gym, inspected TV cameramen and galloped through the banana-yellow hallways while adults discussed shutting down Badgett, in east Little Rock, and two other Little Rock elementary schools. Tlie Tliursday meeting was the first of three meetings scheduled before the School Board votes whether to close Badgett, Dodd and Fair Park elementary schools. Other meetings are scheduled at Dodd on Monday and at Fair See BADGETT,Vage 4B Badgett  Continued from Page 1B Park on Tuesday. The meetings are designed to let school officials explain the shutdown proposal and hear community concerns. We're still in shock, and we .still dont want it to happen,\" said Kim Dunahay, Badgetts Parent Teacher Association president. Even if they vote to close the school, the fights not going to stop. The School Boards vote, rescheduled from Jan. 10 to Jan. 15, comes at a time of financial crisis, said Sadie Mitchell, the districts associate superintendent for school services. In addition to the $2.4 million state funding cut, the school dis-trict must pay $3 million in promised raises. Altogether, the school district must slice $6 million from its annual budget of $220 million. Superintendent Ken James Proposed AUendance Zones Fl  J J Bl Arkansas Democrat-Gazetle/STEPHEN B. THORNTON students if the school is closed. The informational meeting Thursday night al the school was the first of three meetings to discuss potential school closings. said, Were going to have to junious Babbs, associate superintendent for deseg-make some tough decisions. regation for the Little Rock School District, discusses The board is considering clos- proposed attendance zones for Badgett Elementary ing Badgett, Fair Park and Dodd eleinentaries primarily due to nickel-and-dime that to death. applauding when parents praised ular elementary schools, their low enrollments, James Normally, a proposal to close Badgett and spoke against Its Weve tried regular school, said. Tliis year, 153 students at- schools must be announced one closing. said Carrie Igwe, whose fourth-tend Badgett, 188 go to Dodd, and year before the shutdown date. I like it here because most of grade son, Caleb, has attention its tend --------------- 200 attend Fair Park. But with the budget cuts, James the teachers are nice, and they deficit hyperactivity disorder The average Little Rock ele- said, schools must act fast. let you come into their class- and attends the charter school. ' Everybody has to be rooms and they give you treats,\" He has special needs.   *     } Igwe said her son did poorly mentary school has 363 students. ----- If the tliree schools are closed, touched, James told the crowd. 10-year-old Kenetra Lowe said their students would attend dif- \"'rhis is not a win-win situation. after the meeting. Id rather stay in his classes until he came to The one-hour meeting went here. I may be shy to go to an- Badgett. Igwe said she doesnt the next school year. more smoothly than past dis- other school. I wouldnt have any want her son to return to regu- Some teachers would find cussions about closing Badgett, friends on the first day. lar classes, and she balks at pri-   Parents and educators ex- vate school tuition. ferent schools at the start of other jobs in the district, but oth- In 1995, a proposal to close Bad- -------------------------------- _ ers could be laid off, James said, gett met with parents protests pressed concern about the 83 We don't have the kind ol It certainly seemed reason- and a court challenge that forced students who attend Badgett's money to send him to a private able to me, board Vice President the School Board to back down, charter school. The students, school, she said, unless the Lit- But on Thursday, audience many of whom have learning dis- tie Rock School District is going    '   '  ' to pay it for us. Judy Magness said. \"Whenyouve ---- ... . . got to cut $6 million, you cant members listened quietly, tw\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_678","title":"Little Rock Schools: McClellan Community High","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1995/2002"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","McClellan Magnet High School (Little Rock, Ark.)","School management and organization","School improvement programs","Student assistance programs","School facilities"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock Schools: McClellan Community High"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/678"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nOld Glory' MAY 19 1995 Ms. Ann Brown \u0026amp; Staff Office of Desgregation 201 E. Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Bldg. Little Rock, AR 72201 Office of Desegregation Monitoring  1' You are cordially invited to attend the Open^iouse. and (Dedications^ oftfic .'?V ' T\\\u0026gt;' f ! I 5 \u0026gt;* TV 1 i 1I C[inic T uesday May 30,1995 4:00 - 6:00 p.m. McClellan Health Clinic 9417 Geyer Springs Road t. 111 h, 5 R.S.V.P. 570-4149 by May 25 ieL Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 March 6, 1995 Mr. William Fields, President McClellan Community School Advisory Council 9910 Ramona Little Rock, AR 72209 Dear Mr. Fields: As I'm sure you are aware, the desegregation plans and court orders place a great deal of importance on the Community School Program as a means for desegregating McClellan High School. The school district is obligated to involve the McClellan Community High School Advisory Council in making decisions about the program's operations and funding. Court Orders issued on December 30, 1992 and August 26, 1993 have been particularly explicit about the role of the Advisory Council, including budget planning and adjustment. I am very interested in determining how the Advisory Council has been operating, and especially the extent to which the Council has been involved in decisions that affect the school. I will appreciate your forwarding to me the following information immediately: 1, 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Copies of the Council minutes up to the present time, begiiming with the 1993-94 school year. A list of current Council membership by race, gender, and affiliation (such as school employee, business person, retiree, etc.), and the date each member joined the Council. A list of current officers and date of election. Bylaws and the date they were ratified by the Council. Council guidelines for selecting new members. Council guidelines for electing officers. A list of standing committees and a brief summary of their responsibilities. The job description of the program coordinator. Any other information that would be helpful in assessing the make-up and activities of the Council.March 6, 1995 Page Two Also, you may be aware that a business case, which would significantly change the McClellan Community School Program, was recently presented to the Little Rock School District Board of Directors. Please write a short description telling me how the advisory council was involved in developing this or any other business case that proposes to change the community program or its funding. Thank you very much for your assistance. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely yours, A Ann S. Brown cc\nJodie Carter/:a RECE!VEC Office of Desegregasion Moniic MAR 8 1995 ig Community Education A beacon of hope for our children's future... \\ Presented by: .V The McClellan Community Education Advisory Council \\ February 23, 1995 Community Education: A Smart Investment for the Little Rock School District Introduction J. Southwest Little Rock residents dont have to look too far to see the effects of drugs, crime and gang activity, but they also dont have to look too far to see a beacon of hope...right in their own backyard. Some would say the era of neighborhood schools is long gone...but try telling that to the community who benefits daily from the programs and activities provided by Community Education. It is difficult during times of critical financial cutbacks, for the Little Rock School District not to seek cuts from its many programs. But it is also critical to take note of the programs that do work and are effective, and to take responsibility for exploring feasible financial strategies to keep them alive. One must also keep in mind the long-range outcome of these decisions, and the immediate effects they can have on the community. The City of Little Rock, the U.S. Department of Education, area businesses, churches, and community organizations have demonstrated their support for Community Education in the form of dollars and resources. These contributions directly impact not only Little Rock School District students, but the community in which they live. The following approved business case is being submitted by the Community Educations Advisory Council Executive Committee, noting that the business case submitted by the McClellan Community School Principal was factually erroneous, did not involve Communitv Education staff or Advisory Council members in its development, and was submitted without the staff or Councils knowledge or approval. The following business case is being submitted as/amStcat^i?pfen1or^the^^ Education program, and the following recommendations are hereby set forth by the Community Education Advisory Councils Executive Committee to be considered by the Little Rock School District Board, Administration, and Beacon School Steering Committee: 1. lo merge Community Education programs and services wwiitthh the BBeeaaccoonn SScchhnonoll program at Cloverdale Junior High\n2. To merge Community Educations inventory and other community resources with the Beacon School program at Cloverdale Junior High\nand 3. To modify Community Educations personnel and operating budget to reflect a % cut of its 1994-95 budget paid by the Little Rock School District It is the position of the Community Education Advisory Council that these three dations will ensure the continuation of Community Education programs and services. This modification plan will provide the Little Rock School District with $80,000 in budget cuts through a collaborative effort with the City of Little Rock and other community partners. The plan will also provide a well-trained, highly qualified and motivated program staff to recommen-cuts work in a collaborative effort with the Beacon School Program, including over $100,000 in inventory and community resources. Its truly a win-win proposition! Community Education: A Smart Investment for the Little Rock School District The Proposed Solution The following proposal will outline a strategy for each recommendation that will maintain Community Educations current programs, services, and obligations to the Southwest Little Rock community, as well as afford the Little Rock School District with much needed budgetary cuts. Recommendation #1 To merge Community Education programs and services with the Beacon School program at Cloverdale Jimior High School. Overview of Current Programs and Services Community Education is a community-based program that provides a wide variety of programs, services, and recreational activities to Central Arkansas residents, in particular residents of Southwest Little Rock, by utilizing an existing school facility to serve the community after school, evenings, and weekends. Community Education is a concept that provides opportunities for all local community bers, schools, and organizations to become partners in addressing educational and community concerns. The Community School is open year-round with educational opportunities' available to all residents of Central Arkansas. The Community School, in collaboration with other community agencies, provides academic, extracurricular, sports, health, social services, college and work force preparation programs for citizens of all ages, particularly Little Rock School District youth. mem- The goals of the Community School are: to provide programs and services that meet the needs of the community it serves\nto utilize existing school facilities, after school hours, for the provision of programs and services\nand to offer a variety of classes focusing on educational and personal enrichment, prevention, health, recreation, vocational, and job skill development through the reallocation of existing community resources. The Community School currently provides the following programsJ^sCTvices 3^_______ to the Little Rock School District, the City of Little Rock, and the surrounding community. resources reflecting many of the goals of the Beacon School Program! operates after school, evening, summer, and weekend hours\norganizes positive recreational and socialization opportunities for children and youth\nprovides after school tutoring and homework help program for all ages\noffers summer day camp for children ages 6-12\nCommunity Education: A Smart Investment for the Little Rock School District provides summer jobs for youth\norganizes various community projects such as^nfey and June Bug Days\ncoordinates ACT Lock Ins and Care packai K packages for college students (encouraeine students to stay in school)\nprovides a wide range of health and wellness services\noffers GED, literacy programs, and other educational opportunities for older youth and adults\nand encourages positive community involvement and family participation. The Southwest Little Rock Healthy Family Center a.- -The Healthy Family Center program model is designed to develop, implement, and support a comprehensive, community-wide education, prevention and intervention program for children, youth and families in the Southwest Little Rock area, one of the most troubled neighborhoods in the Little Rock School District. The Center will provide direct prevention/ intervention services to participants aimed to reduce factors that contribute to drug and , alcohol use, abuse, and addiction, teen pregnancy, gang involvement, and school dropouts. The programs and activities provided at the Center offer an^ternative to drugs, gangs, and violence. Through membership in the Center, youth earn ^(Qlloalr^sr\u0026lt;.//jj^^:s and other incentives for participation and performance in approved educatiioonnTTddrruugg pprr\u0026lt;evention, life skills, conflict resolution, support groups, and other self improvement classes and activities, in addition to community service work. This service model is based on integrating the existing services, talents and resources of school personnel, service agencies and organizations, churches, businesses and corporations, local and state governments, parents, neighborhood ' associations and civic groups to meet the needs of high risk youth in the Southwest Little Rock area. Community Education has received a federal grant for a two year period from the U.S. Department of Educations Drug-Free Schools and Communities Emergency Grant Initiative to implement the Healthy Family Center program, much in line with the Beacon School Program model, /Ci A comprehensive case maanaageemeentt prrogrraam iiss onee off ttlhe main components of the Healthy Family Center. Trained adult mentors serve as facilitators of peer support groups to identify needs, discuss problems, situations, and other issues that affect the daily lives of young people. The adult mentors are managed by licensed case managers who provide additional counseling services, referral to services, and follow-up care to youth participants and their families. The Community School s Healthy Family Center brings in the resources of community agencies, organizations, and service providers to meet the needs of youth and family participants. The following list represents the magnitude of resources that are currently offered through the Health Family Center, as well as the collaboration that exists between the Healthy Family Center and other SWLR service providers. 4 Community Education: A Smart Investment for the Little Rock School District The Parent Center The MELD Program (Minnesota Early Learning and Development) Program provides parenting and prenatal classes, role modeling, mentors, and support groups, health checks, drug information, meals, and other support services provided by The Parent Center, a Division of Centers for Youth and Families\nThe Step Up Center Substance abuse assessment and referral services for youth who have been identified as using/ abusing drugs and/or alcohol\nand substance abuse support groups for youth and their families are provided by The Step Up Center\nThe Little Rock School District , A Mobile Resource Unit travels throughout the Southwest Litde Rock area providing substance abuse information, WIC services, AFDC and food stamp applications, immunizations, flu shots, blood pressure checks, and other primary health services provided in a collaborative effort with the Arkansas Department of Health, the Little Rock School District, the Rice Depot, Little^Roc^ightog. Back, and the Arkansas Department of Human Services. \"Creative Solutions for Arkansas, Inc. A computerized on-line information, referral, and tracking system that will link the Healthy Family Center, the above service providers, and thirteen (13) area schools via modem to an exclusive network that will enable users to share information regarding the needs of youth participants and their families, and to establish a more responsive service delivery system for the Southwest Little Rock community. Developed and provided by Creative Solutions for Arkansas, Inc. The Healthy Family Center program is currently operating out of McClellan High School, and provides programs and services Monday - Friday from 4:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m., and Saturdays from 9:00 a.m.  1:00 p.m., and organized Saturday evening activites as well. The Healthy Family Center has a program staff of 42 individuals who schedule, develop, coordinate, and manage the programs and services provided after school hours. Program staff includes: A Healthy Family Center Coordinator A Information Management Coordinator Three (3) Case Managers Fifteen (15) Support Group Mentors (10) Peer Tutors A Creative Expression Coordinator Two (2) Security Officer^ Four (4) Healthy Family Center Youth Staff A Summer Camp Coordinator during the summer 5Community Education: A Smart Investment for the Little Rock School District Three (3) Summer Camp Curriculum Specialists One full-time Summer Health Services Specialist during the summer Community Education will receive over $500,000 for a two year period to staff and operate the Healthy Family Center. A smooth transition of the Community Educations Healthy Family Center program to the Beacon School Program could occur without endangering the guidelines of grant funds, if this recommendation obtains School Board approval. Recommendation # 2 To merge Community Educations inventory and other community resources with the Beacon School prograamm aatt CClloovveerrdale Junior High. nas that the  /VvLh.  The Advisory Council recommeni le entire inventory of Community Education be merged with the Beacon School Program (see attach^ inventory list) as welTas other com-munity resources that'have Been\"gene'rated by Community Education. Communi^t^ducation leveraged the following community resources and support, more than/tripplmgme Little Rock School Districts investment: Federal Grant................................ Class Tuition.................................. Corporate Donations................... City Tax Allocation......... ............ Community Festivals................... Agencies Support......................... Neighborhood Associations....... 2 Cool 4 School Summer Camp Medical Donations........................ Total............................................ $235,000 (2 years) 50,000 8,500 5,000 10,300 4,150 275 7,250 100,000 $420,475.00 Thousands of citizens have visited and participated in Community Education programs, classes, and activities. Supportive participation by community members translates into support for the Little Rock School District. Recommendation # 3 To modify Community Educations personnel and operating budget to reflect a 55% cut of its 1994-95 budget paid by the Little Rock School District, The Advisory Council is submitting the following modifications to the Community Education budget that is funded by the Liule Rock School District, The recommendation is thnrTKe  Little Rock School District maintain two (2) full-time positions, two (2) part-time positions, and $ 10,000 of operating expenses for office, brochure and postage expenses. The Advisory 6 Community Education: A Smart Investment for the Little Rock School District Council requests that the following positions be funded by the modification plan: Full-Time Positions Program Director Office Manager/Bookkeeper Part-Time Positions Technical Writer Receptionist Name Brenda Scrimager Rhetta Mayfield Name Susan Williams Pam Adcock The Little Rock School District will cover the cost of a copy machine, telephone, program ( supplies, and fax service. (See attached budget for specific figures and budget totals.) Implementation Plan April 1, 1995 Community Education will be moved to the Beacon School site and a smooth transition of programs and services will occur at Cloverdale Junior High School. May 1, 1995 All Community Education inventory and other community resources will be merged with the Beacon School Program. June 1, 1995 Implement Healthy Family Center summer program and continue programs and services. Hire additional staff with city funds. August 1, 1995 Conduct 6 month review from participating community agencies and organizations and submit evaluation status report to the Little Rock School Board and the Beacon School Steering Committee. Summary This proposal is being submitted as a modification plan to the McClellan Community Education programj,,to.be-c-onsidered-in4ieu-of deletionrhy-thc-tkl ~ .to.be-c-onsidered-m4ieu-ofdeletionrby-thc-trttl\u0026lt;Ro It is the recommendation of the Advisory Coundlth\nRock School Board and Ad- mmistratioi lat Community Education and its programs, resources, and ^aff, merge with the Beacon School program at Cloverdale Junior Higf^SchooI in order to develop a unified, collaborative program that will best serve e youth and families of Southwest Little Rock and the surrounding area. It is the primary intent of the Advisory Council to ensure that Community Educations programs and services continue, that the Healthy Family Center program is a success, and that the hard-work, dedicated staff of Community Education continue their work in Southwest Little Rock. The investment of the Litde Rock School District in Community Education is minimal in comparison to the resources, support, and funds that opportunity for us all. are in turn leveraged. This is a unique 7McClellan Community Education Proposed Budget 1995 - 1996 Fiscal Year FUNDED THROUGH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Budget Line Item ADMINISTRATION: Director Office Manager/Secretary Technical Writer (Part Time) Receptionist (Part Time) Fringe Benefits Total Administration Budget Amount $44,321.04 $19,667.76 $6,760.00 $5,200.00 $8,024.10 $83,972.90 OPERATIONAL EXPENSES: Printing Supplies Total Operational Expenses $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 TOTAL PROJECTED BUDGET $93,972.90 FUNDED THROUGH CITY OF LITTLEROCK Budget Line Item ADMINISTRATION: After School Activities Coor. Youth Workers (4 part time) Evening Supervisor (part time Fringe Benefits Total Administration Budget Amount $6,240.00 $13,572.00 $8,736.00 $2,183.92 $30,731.92 OPERATIONAL EXPENSES: Print Brochure (2 times) Class Brochure Layout Total Operational Expenses $3,000.00 $400.00 $3,400.00 TOTAL PROJECTED BUDGET $34,131.92 TOTAL PROPOSED BUDGET $128,104.82t McClellan community EDUCATION ftI E i 1 hf H i M I E C I N RI I \"T S E Y /g mm C O M R U R 1995-1996 X E o McClellan Community High School Office of Community Education 9417 Geyer Springs Road Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 Phone: (501) 570-4149 XI o co in co McClellan Community Education is designed to develop a partnership between the school and community in order to provide educational opportunities and services to McClellan students, parents, other patrons, Little Rock School District employees, residents of Southwest Little Rock and neighboring communities.tCIKBBBBg LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT John L. McClellan Community High School 9417 Geyer Springs Road Phone 570-4100  Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 February 26, 1996 RECEIVED MAR 1 8 1996 Linda Pondexter, President Little Rock School Board 810 W. Markham Street Little Rock, AR. 72201 Office of Desegregation Mcmionng Dear Madam President \u0026amp; Little Rock School Board Members\nWe the undersigned wish to express our support for McClellan Community Education. We feel that Community Education assists the Little Rock School District in fulfilling its mission to provide quality, integrated education to all patrons by providing numerous - courses and programs. Currently, Community Education offers educational programming for people of all ages. These programs include: Community Education courses\nthe McClellan Community Education Tutorial Program\n2 Cool 4 School Summer Day Camp\nACT Workshops and Lock-in\nand a variety of activities and services. We feel that it would be a great loss to McClellan and the community if Community Education was no longer available. Please join us in support of McClellan Community Education. Sincerely, McClellan Community Education Advisory Board Members / Student Patrons \u0026lt; (Lhsvel.a ___axad\u0026amp;icd I'l/nJir/ J^hki(KaMtoL. iL3lz2ZS13OOpLjQ(:^ L- ^nMLC..~ftHzinirk/)O lk)k)-\n|X (JUni-xvin, nna.Student Patrons ~ ~ ' u Wes^Jiffidfe^ bnC^Student Patrons  a ia. 1 ,0 Ai^V \"7/z 3 J __w\\j Av-tJ\"-- I dm'] f n m? g [v^rs J (I'cprib JAiyryc ^xg?hQ \\ vrvC\\\\'\\\\\\O \u0026lt; \\^p\\a 0^ CXxkdA^ S\u0026lt;\n)^-s-___ P^T^O/V B^a-5 Id\n/ s -Student Patrons 9c\\r'\\rj')tiC P/L \u0026lt;73 ALiXAli^^^ Cr^Tli^ W l\u0026lt;i7Lf^l. arilL^iC 'IZZo'i P lC k CaV \u0026lt;1-. \\ 1^ trc ,tS'yo^i:xA^^c'gd~*^^'3 1 #?(vt: ~itTi\\ ^ZKY)^^ /6 2^. ^-^Sl \u0026lt; klUl^ j^ocU. 7^202. JS^'^ P,.k\u0026lt;tt'^ 3C:)2 7^. /(x\u0026gt; f S kkri __U,^C\u0026lt;S\u0026gt; ^hOMlAA. F\\!)M \u0026lt;37'-Ilb f^/e,Q/e '/Z'zoq \\^\\ s. \\xX^\u0026amp;\\g^ 5io^-^r6^ r n r?\\ /v\\I\\ O nr^fv^o QC^ijiiix qi(\\u yr^oodv.V 9^ n^ql\\jar^i^ ft\\(K'r-c\\AS LrO-^ Student Patrons (:^:(r/r\u0026lt;r'GS 7=^9 5+v^ick lav id (L\\j. ! .P \" -  XI Phillips 2_ I KromIi (Tr^-r5p i v\\no. tno.(b/\u0026gt;\u0026gt;i.) Ll^. '?e2M 71, ^\u0026lt;17^ WvaJ/lcM. /..ft. 777Jfl /fl0r74.l\u0026lt;A-(lf\u0026lt;l W k.K iPmp.50n \u0026lt;^roi Kpiff))- P ).?. lif\u0026amp;h-brn'iL____LZ____1SS\u0026gt;c77 hasLc-J^^ llfeti/oti) 1^^. JJi. 7^7.01^1 Adult Patrons iCLVWVj,^^ Ai P/McA-f^^e, LoAp'Wu^ /'reZ//^ /) Ulf , /7e7so ~S/f(i7s6 a u'\u0026lt;7l' '^4' 72c: ? C Oti^ , t\\(^ ~iai\u0026amp;b D 7!^^ i44/^ e,^,2A L/7 7^7. 7zzg7o f^iTuj ^f7YyxPA7()Qin ^pJjj.yyyi DnVfc Li-M^ ^^cki I 7a0x^6 jbV?v^ Ucdl^c^ (d\u0026gt; JlZ^J '770^ 72^/7. ^X)AB77^y\\J\\aAK^j]PJazz\n?y^, 77ib!^ zTs., 1 7a -7A:i6\u0026lt;/ u 3/7 '^,7^ '/\\^ LjdiX'J a-t\u0026gt;i \u0026lt;7 C'- if7^ \u0026lt;4 774L^74 7\u0026gt;772(i4 cAQ/\\(^\u0026lt;i \u0026lt;^cu}lcrk^i5^i7e} M. MfM.ijr, i2. 7^b2s- icfa ^/?, fie / (TctM^ I401 uJakt^i.rx: LiMj,7Lj!',M'J^M cStg-phoG^^ LairnA ftibr i^h-V CLr. CA\u0026gt;Qe^~^3^lp -7^-^ fd Y)~W\u0026lt;jA^ g. ^/IjT^'yryd^ ( ^(jol7rdn7i.(J- ^/\n^t,3777 '77^7':i Adult Patrons v^/-7u/7 7^-71')^!^^ 7 7/,^ SbO. '7'^') -C- ciicY-iy u. Ed. \u0026amp;.)C 'tnrbe^ IoId^ ^^6fci/ib(Ar r4tS 7 i- 1 iir. /' . ,^ , -lastD^ /'lAA Z/.7 ! n C^J- 'Z Alo^c/e-^ 714 !/) / C A 72 ZlZf/C, A7C7^7c4, .ji.^tun Y/^1 lfO\u0026lt;^ (\u0026lt; L^ r c /,C-/.i^ ^C, ' A/L/, /AcJA^ ?W ^1_________p/L, o/nO^fy, :iiC 1/^1/ 77ai^f\\ /iscrn^tiamhf^AT^-C}/.Adult Patrons + cAv^ywiAOiu pvclj. l_/L.-l'!--l- fogwj^s m:.bp(\u0026gt;\u0026gt;aQ,Cktc o\ni\\p'\n^ yz-^,z'j !i.llJ A. WL s\n_: ^/ 17}kib-. /' 72~/^ VlljdY Y.2.\u0026gt;/- 'lv'.,i 23'^lil-rt^.tt.-lltoH :-------..........  i ^ro KU n (Uffl\u0026lt;: M -,-zM  AA foy jf /)^ h / /j A A J [) l\\p A , f J^/t- 6-/2/p2- k^^Ok ru ^6//iA\u0026lt;zPi2\\^ ]\u0026gt;r, m\\A PO. UP. ,nd iPlD^7^C)Q ___1^007. 2^ j!^^' 2./^-/^ ^Mx^^ACk, /r}.^r}JP,I^.A^^ 27^-^ -f 1^11 'rCrff^p/tW jo=/^\u0026lt;^^^^Ld:j2 /2c^ C\\. Y \u0026lt;^fCi /Lt r16~vt ^Ztl J UJI PrtzM WtJ? !.- IaJ 1 V A Adult Patrons r/K? iVe^r ^STutzzW, ulX '[V\\(xA^AJl^JrJ^ (ja 1^/0 2 \u0026lt;y I SoLA-//ui?c.z.. L.!?. nSLAC^t ________f-O./^j41^15^M13.\n:iN-i\u0026gt;/3y UOzr. \u0026amp;.rk^2^ l^iJ^ ------------------------ Cjy^a 'Ti YajX^. 172.J3Z2^ \u0026gt; Va3.oI(\\c^x.5^ Qk\\ fbii /Ij l-l? '7'f'i.^'^ JL /y^ '2:i^2crs^ St^r-Lonrrl 'A k c AgspAdc. /^AMryJk l^Ll^-------------- lAJ^'vula. j-il(.i Oi^D, a \u0026lt;A\u0026lt;./\u0026gt;^ ' ^Idd/xfa/^ 1)/. 7-2S/j=1 '-m/j/u^yhMAJ- 1. //1135 \"Kt'\u0026gt;nJimi/i\\^iJ^JJ- ^A'AM'/jI'k^ '1jli. 2oo2^Oku // Adult Patrons /^iz-r S 7i^i------------------------- ^l?)lb'i/fA(ld hii/liDffl, Ac. l'0aL\\ l6j^, 4^. \\^JLlJLj O.iJ^___\u0026gt;^ao l^nLAli^^lJ:^ (tc 1^00 y^- Bl/v^Olf' iTt 1^'/ fyjL^ /o M,(K7' r. CxV'A^Srj .^Ci /^fhDxtA \u0026amp;iij^ Bif^i.n.d ZK 7,?\u0026lt;^^3~ 'noaoc^^y' KVIk^iuuI U) Ajlhuwl- 5^ rM .y^y yl/y y^ay Q'uKy ^^^e(rc-cL \u0026lt;,i/?/)^ 7Adult Patrons 15^/ '7^\u0026lt;^c /Lua. ^/1/1 \u0026lt;: IC ^^QVYf\\.\u0026amp;,^^ ^yteA. OVyif^k^Xi^^ , -\n^5//) ysi^3 5^/ McClellan Community Education 1996-1997 Revised Budget Administration: Full Time Employees: Director Office Manager Receptionist Total Full Time 38,404.56 20,663.13 11,558.00 $ 70,625.69 Full Time Employee Benefits: Retirement (12%) Hospital ($1,963.00) Life ($65.00) Di Lt (.587%) State Tax ($65.00) Hospital Indenity ($67.00) Dental (205.00) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 8,475.08 5,889.00 195.00 414.57 195.00 201.00 615.00 Total Benefits Total Administration Salary and Benefits $ 15,984.65 86,610.34 Part Time Employees: Night Supervisor Security Total Part Time Salaries 8,640.00 8,677.50 17,317.50 FICA Total Administrative 6,727.65 $ 110,655.49 MCE Tutorial Program $ 28,602.17 Total Projected Expenses $ 139,257.66 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $30,000 Operating Expenses are to be paid from Community Education's current Activity Account which has acccumlated to $53,160.06 since 1991. Page 1McClellan Community Education Student Programs McClellan Student Council ACT Tutoring Services ACT Lock-In McClellan CE Tutorial Program - A.M. \u0026amp; P.M. McClellan CE Homework Help Program 2 Cool 4 School Summer Day Camp Healthy Family Center Mentoring Case Management Educational Enrichment - 'Creative Arts Program' Tutoring Program LRSD Students K-121. 2. 3. 4. McClellan community education Community Education Program Needs/Interests Assessment Spring 1996 Have you ever taken a Community Education class? 44 Yes If not. Why not?  no interest 4 not affordable 24_ no free time 90 No 26 didnt know about classes A no transportation 9 inconvenient time __ other\nplease explain What are the best days for you to attend classes/activities? Monday 47 Thursday 46 Saturday 55 Tuesday 14 Friday Do you prefer a class/activity that meets: 83 once a week 31 twice a week 18 on weekends  5. If on-site child-care were available while you attended class, would you take advantage of it? 26 Yes 77 No 6 If yes, what are the ages of your children needing childcare? 9 7 0-3 years 4-6 years _ 6-12 years 7. Do you have a problem with transportation which would prevent you from taking a class? Yes ^No 8. Are you most interested in taking a course: 3^ to refresh knowledge and skills of present job. 48_ to increase possibility for promotion in present employment. 41_ to learn skills required for different employment. 9 to return to college. 78_ for personal improvement or recreation. 9. Of the following classes/activities, please check the ones which interest you. A. RECREATION AND SPORT 4 Bridge 1^ Modem Dancing 1^ Square Dancing 10 Tennis 12 Softball 11 Basketball 2 Mens Calisthenics 4 GymnasticsZTumbling 6 Chess  Ballet W Ballroom Dancing Golf U Volleyball Fishing 8 Wildlife/Hunting 4_5 Acrobics/Gym exercise B. C. D. DO IT YOURSELF 15 Plumbing 25 Landscaping/Lawn care 2D Fashion design 27 Interior decorating 16 Small engine repair 27 Foods/cooking 36 Auto care for women _2 Other ENRICHMENT COURSES 28 Reading improvement 5 Creative writing 14 Estate planning/wills 14 Oil/watercolor painting 13 Quilting _8 Stitchery 10 Guitar _5 Community theatre _P Macrame 4 Choral group 16 Foreign language _8 Advanced photography _2 Other HUMAN RELATIONS 13 Single parenting First aid/CPR _1 Coping with divorce Self-esteem 39 Home repairs 3^ Gardening 2i Upholstery 19. Sewing 11. Carpentry 16 Cake decorating 20 Furniture refinish/repair Speed reading Family finance 9 Jewelry making 5 Basic design in art 4 Leather craft 9 Knitting/crochet 10 Wood working 23 Flower arranging 1 Decoupage 5 Great books 1^ Basic photography 13 Calligraphy 13^ Parent effectiveness 1 Pre- \u0026amp; post natal Stress management 12 Family relations 3 Support groups (AA, NA, Co-Dependency, Cocaine Anonymous, ACoA) E. EDUCATION EMPLOYMENT 47 Introduction to Computers 23 Small Business Development _5 Electrical Technology _4 Real Estate _5 Professional Child Care 3 Food Service 27 Data Processing 11 Teaching Assistant n Literacy 19 Office Management _5 Commercial Drive Licensing 4 Basic Retail Clerking _6 College Math, Algebra 26 Accounting 23 24 2 Tj-ping/Kejboarding Clerical/Secretarial Marketing Patient Care Aide 16 Social Work Assistant 3 Building/Construction 2 Dental Assistant 3 Pilot License Testing 10 Banking 10 _5 0 Speed Writing Graduate courses Other 10. If there are other classes/activities which you are interested in, please list them. Tourism, air bursh painting, piano lessons, video production classeszor AD I i i / . 1 I f /1AJJ3 11. Please rank the top three (3) concerns you have for your communi ty/neighborhood. 14. Please check your appropriate age group and sex. 6_3_ Drugs 2^ Unemploym^ _3J Poor Citjf Se^cei 9 Health Cime  2 Public Transportation Violence 6 Houaing I Ediicationa! system \"\"41 Crime'*- H, Lack of recreation 1^ Lade of adult education opportunities 9 Lade of community pride 1^ Lack of afterschool program for youth 12. Would you be willing to serve on the Community Education Advisory Council to address problems and concerns of this community and school? 9 18-23 32^ 26 -45   3r 46 -'53 36 + ll'-Nto'  \"Il  Female IS. If McClellan'Community Education classes were discontinued, would you: 23 Yes 72 No 13. If yes, please give us your name, address and daytime phone number. Name: - \" 78 consider it a loss.   Q not care. . - - 47 be disappointed. .'i. 72 expect a replacement. _5 give up on continuing your education. 4 figure that it was in the best interest of the Little Rock School District. 4 other (please explain) See below Address:\nu City, State: y,. Zip: Daytime phone number: 16. In support of McClellan Community Educaiton, I have enclosed a donation of: . $5.00 j:r.- 2 $10.00 _$25.00  .,' 4 I - other: $ m\nQuestion 15 Other: - Find another class - Oomnunity will lose excellent opportunity for learning. - Search for another way to get trining to inprove - Consider producing a 60 second publication service video to air oncable for informing the community about classes. 3I\nI IRepresentative Edward F. Thicksten P,O. Box 2019 Alma, AR 72921-2019 301-632-2117 Business 501-632-4288 Residence 501-632-2149 FAX STATE OF ARKANSAS COMMITTEES CHAIRMAN Joint Budget DISTRICT 11 Part of Crawford County MEMBER Education State Agencies and Governmental Affairs Joint Committee on Energy March 11. 1996 Ms. Linda Ponde.xter. President Board of Directors Little Rock School District S10 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Dear Ms. Pondexter: I am writing to you and the members of the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District concerning the McClellan Community Education Program. Please accept this letter as a statement of my support for the continuation of this valuable education program, which provides a myriad of educational services to the students of McClellan High School as well as to the surrounding community. In addition to working with the community to foster a strong learning environment and providing supplemental instruction to students who score below the 25th percentile on the Stanford 8 Achievement Test, the Director, Ms. Marion Baldwin, is actively involved in the development of programs and activities that address the educational needs of McClellans students. Ms. Baldwin also serves as an advisor to the McClellan Student Council. As the Chairman of the House Joint Budget Committee, 1 understand the difficult choices that must be made to ensure fiscal stabilitv and responsibility. However, I would encourage you to consider the totality of benefits provided bv the McClellan Community Education Program and continue to fund this worthwhile program. Thank vou for vour consideration in this matter If 1 may be of further assistance to y ou regarding this or an\\ other matter, please do not hesitate to contact me Sincereh. Edward F Thicksten State Representative cc: Dr. Henry Williams Ms. Marion Baldwin Jennifer Edwards 9211 Oak Grow Lana Utlla Rock, AR 722096222 Taiaphons (501)560-2067 To Whom It May Concern: It has come to n^ attention that the LRSD is considering cutting community education as a way of dealing with its budget crisis. I think that this would be an incredible loss to those of us who have utilized the community education program. I personally took the ACT prep course. My guidance counselor recommended the program to me after I took the PSAT and did very well on tny verbal section, but showed some problems with the mathematics section. After taking the prep course, I took the December ACT and scored a 30, this was the first time I had taken the ACT. The prep course for the ACT proved to be of enormous value to me. I received scholarships to attend TCU in Fort Worth, Hendrix in Conway, and UCA in Conw^. TCU and UCA both invited me to participate in die Honors Programs. These programs are for those students who are identified as having an enormous potential for contributing academically and socially to the university community. I am currently a member of the Honors Program at UCA. I have maintained my ACT scholarship for the four years I have been at UCA. I am a member of Alpha Chi, Psi Chi, and Who's Who, in part because of my participation in the Honors Prograco. The ACT prep course has proved invaluable to me. For a simple fee of S50.00, my parents and I have saved $8,000.00 in tuitioa Aldiougb the results will not be the same for every student, I strongly believe that the ACT prep course is a necessary part of the community education progranL ft can make the difference from being conditionally admitted, to being unconditionally admitted, ft has been my experience that this can make a big difference for many students. Sincerely, March 7, 1996 Mrs. Pat Leach McClellan Community High School Office of Community Education 9417 Geyer Springs Road Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 Dear Pat: Word Perfect 5.1 offered by the Thank you for teaching me --- McClellan Community High School Office of Community Education. I wanted to tell you how much easier you have made my workload. I can do a memo in less than ten minutes. I*7h came to this position at HUD in November 1995, it took me two hours, and I was wasting so much paper trying to learn. came to When I But when you told us about the \"magic\" key, (Fl) the first day you taught, it changed my whole life! I also appreciated the individual time The class was fun. 1 --- you gave to me when I did not understand how to do Your patience and calm voice were so much something, appreciated. Pat, be sure to our first day of class, to help us. tell Donna Larking that she was very good on She, also, gave us individual time Mrs. Roby's cookies were good, too! Sincerely, Carolyn Henry Multifamily Housing Representative Department of HUD 1/ cc: Mrs. RobyThrough the process of community education the Community Education Office fosters community support for McClellan Community School and the Little Rock School District. Via planned programs and activities the Community Education Office enhances community involvement and coordinates an education service for the community.For information regarding currently offered Community Education courses or to suggest possible course offerings for the future, please contact our office located at 9417 Geyer Springs Road Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 Phone: (501) 570-4149* r A/C'f'*^'/ \u0026lt; Zi Po X, -^ f ft _ _Jn.- \u0026gt;\u0026lt;A-  * 1 McClellan community EDUCATION i c I O N Mt N I E T S c o M P U E R S nmw E N R I R E C R E A I O N l_ TVI N 1 i i 1 1 1995-1996\u0026gt;^0'' S\nV. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DI John L. McClellan Community High School 9417 Geyer Springs Road February 26, 1996 Phone 570-4100  Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 RECE5VED Linda Pondexter, President Little Rock School Board Slow. Markham Street Little Rock, AR. 72201 MAR 1 8 1996 Office of Desegregation Monitoring Dear Madam President \u0026amp; Little Rock School Board Members: We the undersigned wish to express our support for McClellan Community Education. We feel that Community Education assists the Little Rock School District in fulfilling its mission to provide quality, integrated education to all patrons by providing numerous courses and programs. Currently, Community Education offers educational programming for people of all ages. These programs include: Community Education courses\nthe McClellan Community Education Tutorial Program\n2 Cool 4 School Summer Day Camp\nACT Workshops and Lock-in\nand a variety of activities and services. We feel that it would be a great loss to McClellan and the community if Community Education was no longer available. Please join us in support of McClellan Community Education. Sincerely, McClellan Community Education Advisory Board Members lyvAjM) L 7 1 i I Student Patrons SOiMLAnkLO 7^ Al __/'l/rs}ir/ k^kovAflc (Lh^le,. /oh/i^ (^i^- ZSzii QJTL r ZZjJiLiik ''\u0026amp;tnMLL1Ht]ij.O^ 'Y^tri^cL^ Ikk'^k-__ (JjTli'XVin, vnj. W7^ M  V@ JStudent Patrons Sc(\u0026gt;}iP~^_________ 6^\u0026lt;3/k2. ___________ I IStudent Patrons a 1 p txh, '^iVy P/z 13 coCi^ \u0026gt;^i(l_______________\\ ,____I_ m r g i v^tTs C\\?A ilticer5t'z JAtVyr ^bo \\C\u0026gt; \\vrvpV\\V\u0026lt;r^ AZ/c/-\\ol/:^5 '\\^p\\n Vgicx-^ ov 0f\\Aui5jA. iSz^ \u0026lt;-S H 5 Pq.(7| PEEOSJOAllM ^rPpP(f\\ b(5nPkVfn'f^Student Patrons ^3/)^ Pc f'-ljlf^AA K, 7A.t.U.'tfA [ __^i/J!^ .. 7J yJi\u0026lt;l-XTLH. LlvUlfia^ic lo. L,^J-Li\u0026gt; . -72.^! ^Sf^ Ylts t^trC .vS^XIg^x'x^v^cTcP^^B^ (.\u0026gt;?fvL .\u0026lt;}:LiLSbu\nU)^4^eck 72202. ^/YY}^ IG 2.^ X}\\k^ OtimA 363 /Jrf'/^fbdc /(jy fS ktn ,Cf^'A\u0026lt;kQi. kXD GiSt^s \u0026lt;\"\u0026gt;3 \\^V S .^MaJc/X. A)7/i, (\u0026lt;J-/-Oii\u0026amp;-17Zoq , . \\ kXirw^^Xt^jA BEibLJDeerJLacxhxj^^ jnpif\\C\\C\u0026gt;i TALe.Q-^ Khalifl Ph.ll.p-j Student Patrons 6^T^r\u0026lt;\u0026lt;S S4 yvi'ck (c\\v C,\\j, L^.f^ (ifitjz (Viu'e nAO.(b/h.tj L.^ 'IZ'lO'l Q'z:2(\\^ 2L_\u0026amp;u4ii_2iSJn^li^^ a3{, /pOpgl/A\u0026lt;\\jl W ffiQpa)D_^XlJLUDt-24^^ \npf^elrr i^rh'd L ^9S)O? i^eAi/oui pR. lji.. 7^7.a'j^Adult Patrons ftddi I) 1^4/7^ w 7 At/',/!\u0026lt;' 7:ic7C i44/^ At^.7ZZG6, flmj-nxii @jvHPA\u0026gt;6?^lr) '^pdij_Yr)(i DnV\u0026amp; Li-Me 4-! 0 e J/IAAre?7 {7',Ac3f 4^^, A^f^ 4^1 J/\\AAre?e-t e :i^ XzVTs^LQO^ /j cSxMt Ey2^ I^LU^ ly\u0026gt;^. A^6 'QQ I 740^ Y ^^AA^-VA^A^A^Adj AAaa^. '^/^./^. 41^1 ,7/// Z^4/^\u0026gt; A A ______ 'j/?^wA'4i4cyi' s/'n tmia __7f p * 3/^ 72^/^ 2k. !' lid. \u0026gt;^J^- ^(^15 fy}aJi4i k, -i)~ro7__ UJoackon cS\n)tspPwA\u0026lt;vl^irru Albri\u0026lt;jh-^ dr. L7, ^(\u0026amp;^aJ is \\/\u0026gt;dcc Ld^ Lk\u0026lt;^ IS -7^-^/?) ^/lj2AArry(7\u0026lt;r^ 3 ] ) ?)^)ri' Dr, 7)r,Adult Patrons Hp.n iu, /Q G\u0026gt;h. 1^0 4 A- Ar S bOMb-w-ub/^ NL pp puA A^/Ainy/AAA- Al yA/ 14 -tg. (}i^ XA CXy AfLzxl Io1o?\u0026gt; _An L.JC '^^0 3 ^// i.l'l''' -'-i :r 1 (^I^tAAOiy^ 44,, C^.xJ\u0026lt;\u0026gt;i4v^ / 0/^K^ c^^^y\\.fsLiA.^ L-) ^ I V SJj, ( 'c/ C} b. 0(\u0026gt;i/i^h____2 Ahc'rd^e/} C'J- 15 L, -z Q4 \u0026amp;. 7M AJlA, ArL f \u0026lt; ( f 2^/// ?k^ ____________p/b Oj//A(^^ qAA!/ (k^/i 'i\u0026gt; 3 ,-^#Z/ /V. '?:iA.D VT^/ar 4/LAdult Patrons . y^/l  222^2. eAvo^m^ q3\"iqiiz\n'D^.:^c, e/t. 7^t- fofaaicJ^ii rw, h)O^a.P\u0026gt; ,(M n\nno?s \u0026lt;2 C^atrtA s^. XQ^ WL 2 U. fh.UL haki2Biii\u0026amp;2i2\u0026lt; \u0026lt;ir7fjr^(\u0026lt;__ 7/ ij^kTtr. OiKt,^,A/?M- ')^2^.7' ,' yAl/JCckJl--Ik--.. ZA- 727jJY 23^ kA A. L7U.aH !DCi S^/r - C~[^ 7 2.7.'0^ ______________^(\u0026gt;90/^/./^AC y:3. I oy ^^lQ\u0026lt;L3iyy^^Ca^'ry^____^6/yAc\n^C2i4\\(^ Ivy'^C^/l^kk UO, ,nd iDlDlJc ^ij'/ /f/ __7^\n'6f Mx^Ck. 5?0/OreAA. /n.ii^n^.Q.A^. 1^i Ar, 'A,Adult Patrons A/|z\u0026lt;.ric/t U^Ob LdLL7?Ai^ '^OlVWI (1a 1^/02 ^OLVWt 6a f Pazm AU^x i7}ci^6i 'T^lTfx:^ 6^? c I ^c^7Zui?cZ nSL^C(\\ /f),(i^}iL^]/T/cil-J/JiAM-__7-^^^ 3''3~(:\u0026gt;6 ) j?s.^'V.^x^.Qsfc.iQi. X/T. 7^'^7 J'-^J3Z3^ iA3.biRnxc^ Qk\\ .Vj?iCOick).P I 7 J 7? '^ 0 2C,0 77. /-J 1/1/ SfriAJfwl -QA k i-AgSpAdf tAAZVdirw.llg IH O' - a s '77i-3as.- ^5-0 ( ^1 7^..Z'2SXi.'=1. 7/iAjL7/Kft^ //7a 07^ 7\u0026lt;i J(7^3^/) 77]F^i/r77(^ Sou2..I I I I I I I I Ss I Si '/1f^ IB //\" Adult Patrons hrlfiM'Ac,\n^2. ::? i J t^i'\u0026lt;^'^ i-t^-c- L 1^___UM hOA g4at. t^\u0026lt;' 1^. I.H.I, O.lIX- IbvUAli^il^l 1  \\ f / U^vyvvVtZt^Myy ,2--^ i . cl /2. ciVA\u0026gt;Hsrf + \u0026lt;^1 /^pzMvx^ ^Ccuv r)e\u0026amp;rMeoc\u0026amp;^- '^l-y)\u0026lt;y^ -*4 .2 Ai? MjM/ -r- Miiw'ntiTin f'ftMiiHMwrfliiirn'tiiTariit Adult Patrons 15^1 *7 ^/1/1 \u0026lt; /b\u0026lt;^J QVYrs.x\u0026gt;.^^ ^x^yizXvn fOSoo b5j^) fr)a}j^jAk-(14 1:25.:^^ y^i^3McClellan Community Education 1996-1997 Revised Budget Administration\nFull Time Employees\nDirector Office Manager Receptionist 38,404.56 20,663.13 11,558.00 Total Full Time $ 70,625.69 Full Time Employee Benefits\nRetirement (12%) Hospital ($1,963.00) Life ($65.00) Di Lt (.587%) State Tax ($65.00) Hospital Indenity ($67.00) Dental (205.00) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 8,475.08 5,889.00 195.00 414.57 195.00 201.00 615.00 Total Benefits Total Administration Salary and Benefits $ 15,984.65 86,610.34 Part Time Employees\nNight Supervisor Security Total Part Time Salaries 8,640.00 8,677.50 17,317.50 FICA Total Administrative 6,727.65 $ 110,655.49 MCE Tutorial Program $ 28,602.17 Total Projected Expenses $ 139,257.66 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $30,000 Operating Expenses are to be paid from Community Education's current Activity Account which has acccumlated to $53,160.06 since 1991. Page 1McClellan Community Education Student Programs McClellan Student Council ACT Tutoring Services ACT Lock-In McClellan CE Tutorial Program - A.M. \u0026amp; P.M. McClellan CE Homework Help Program 2 Cool 4 School Summer Day Camp Healthy Family Center Mentoring Case Management Educational Enrichment - Creative Arts Program' Tutoring Program LRSD Students K-12McClellan community education Community Education Program Needs/Interests Assessment Spring 1996 1. Have you ever taken a Community Education class? 44 Yes 2. If not. Why not? no interest 4 not affordable 24 no free time 90 No 26 didnt know about classes A no transportation 9 inconvenient time __ other, please explain 3. What are the best days for you to attend classes/activities? 67 Monday 47 Thursday 46 Saturday 55 Tuesday 14 Friday 4. Do you prefer a class/activity that meets: 83 once a week 31 twice a week 18 on weekends 5. If on-site child-care were available while you attended class, would you take advantage of it? 26 Yes 77 No 6 If yes, what are the ages of your children needing childcare? 9 T 0-3 years 4-6 years _ 6-12 years 7. Do you have a problem with transportation which would prevent you from taking a class? B DO IT YOURSELF 15 Plumbing 25 Landscaping/Lawn care 20 Fashion design 27 Interior decorating 16 Small engine repair 27 Foods/cooking 26 Auto care for women _2 Other C ENRICHMENT COURSES 28 Reading improvement 5 Creative writing 14 Estate planning/wills 14 Oil/watercolor painting 13 Quilting Stitchery 10 Guitar _5 Community theatre _P Macrame 4 Choral group 16 Foreign language _8 Advanced photography _2 Other D. HUMAN RELATIONS 13 Single parenting 22 First aid/CPR 1 Coping with divorce 31 Self-esteem M Home repairs Gardening 21_ Upholstery 19 Sewing 11 Carpentry 16 Cake decorating Furniture refinish/repair Speed reading Family finance 9 Jewelry making 5 Basic design in art 4 Leather craft 9 Knitting/crochet W Wood working 23 Flower arranging 1 Decoupage 5 Great books Basic photography 13 Calligraphy Parent effectiveness 1 Pre- \u0026amp; post natal 40 Stress management Family relations _ Yes IOOno 8. Are you most interested in taking a course: 3^ to refresh knowledge and skills of present job. 48_ to increase possibility for promotion in present employment. 41_ to learn skills required for different employment. 9 to return to college. 78_ for personal improvement or recreation. 3 Support groups (AA, NA, Co-Dependency, Cocaine Anonymous, ACoA) E EDUCATION EMPLOYMENT 9. Of the following classes/activities, please check the ones which interest you. A RECREATION AND SPORT 4 Bridge Modem Dancing Square Dancing 10^ 1 ly 2 Tennis Softball Basketball Mens Calisthenics 4 Gymnastics/Tumbling h Chess 4 Ballet W Ballroom Dancing (\u0026gt; Golf Volleyball Fishing 8 Wildlife/Hunting Aerobics/Gym exercise 47 Introduction to Computers 23 Small Business Development _5 Electrical Technology _4 Real Estate _5 Professional Child Care 3 Food Service 27 Data Processing 11 Teaching Assistant _0 Literacy' 19 Office Management _5 Commercial Drive Licensing _4 Basic Retail Clerking _6 College Math, Algebra 26 Accounting ^3 T^Tjing/Keyboarding ^4 Clerical/Secretarial 10 Marketing Patient Care Aide 16 Social Work Assistant 3 Building/Construction 2 Dental Assistant 3 Pilot License Testing 10 Banking 10 Speed Writing 5 Graduate courses 0 Other ___ 10. If there are other classes/activities which you are interested in, please list them. Tourism, air bursh painting, niarro lessons, video production classes11. Please rank the top three (3) concerns you have for your communi ty/neighborhood. 14. Please check your appropriate age group and sex. 62 Drugs Unemployment 3 Poor City Services 9 Healthcare 2 Public Transportation W. Lack of adult education opportunities 9 Lack of community pride 12 Lade of afterschool program for youth Violence 6 Housing 20 Educational system 41 Crime H Lack of recreation 2 32 32 18 18-25 26-45 46-55 56 + n. Male 34 Female 15. If McClellan Community Education classes were discontinued, would you: 12. Would you be willing to serve on the Community Education Advisory Council to address problems and concerns of this community and school? 23 Yes 7^ No 13. If yes, please give us your name, address and daytime phone number. Name: 78 consider it a loss. 0 not care. 47 be disappointed. 22 expect a replacement. _5 give up on continuing your education. 4 figure that it was in the best interest of the Little Rock School District. 4 other (please explain) See below Address: City, State: Zip: Daytime phone number: 16. In support of McClellan Community Educaiton, I have enclosed a donation of: _ $5.00 2 $10.00 _$25.00 other: $ Question 15 Other: - Find another class - Cemmunity will lose excellent oppoirtunity for learning. - Search for another way to get trining to inprove - Consider producing a 60 second publication service video to air oncable for informing the conmunity about classes.Representative Edward F. Thicksten P.O. Box 2019 Alma. AR 72921-2019 501-632-2117 Business 501-632-1288 Residence 501-632-2149 FAX DISTRICT II Part of Crawford County COMMITTEES STATE OF ARKANSAS CHAIRMAN Joint Budget MEMBER Education State Agencies and Governmental Affairs Joint Committee on Energy March 11. 1996 Ms. Linda Pondexter, President Board of Directors Little Rock School District S10 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Dear Ms. Pondexter: I am writing to you and the members of the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District concerning the McClellan Community Education Program. Please accept this letter as a statement of my support for the continuation of this valuable education program, which provides a myriad of educational services to the students of McClellan High School as well as to the surrounding community. In addition to working with the community to foster a strong learning environment and providing supplemental instruction to students who score below the 25th percentile on the Stanford 8 Achievement Test, the Director, Ms. Marion Baldw in, is actively involved in the development of programs and activities that address the educational needs of McClellan s students. Ms. Baldwin also serves as an advisor to the McClellan Student Council. As the Chairman of the House Joint Budget Committee, 1 understand the difficult choices that must be made to ensure fiscal stability and responsibility. However, 1 would encourage you to consider the totality of benefits provided by the McClellan Community Education Program and continue to fund this worthwhile program. Thank you for y our consideration in this matter If 1 may be of fiirther assistance to y ou regarding this or any other matter, please do not hesitate to contact me Sincereix. Edward F Thicksten State Representative cc\nDr Henry Williams Ms. Marion Baldwin Jennifer Edwards 9211 Oak Grove Lane Utile Rock. AR 722066222 Telephone (501) 560-2007 To Whom It May Concern: It has come to attention that the LRSD is considering cutting community education as a way of dealing with its budget crisis. I think that this would be an incredible loss to those of us who have utilized the community education program. I personally took the ACT prep course. My guidance counselor recommended die program to me after I took the PSAT and did very well on my verbal section, but showed some problems with the mathematics section. After taking the prep course, I took die December ACT and scored a 30, this was die first time I had taken die ACT. The prep course for die ACT proved to be of enormous value to me. I received scholarships to attend TCU in Fort Worth, Hendrix in Conw^, and UCA in Conw^. TCU and UCA bodi invited me to participate in the Honors Programs. These programs are for those students who are identified as having an enormous potential for contributing academically and socially to the university communify. I am currently a member of the Honors Program at UCA. I have maintained my ACT scholarship for the four years I have been at UCA. I am a member of Alpha Chi, Psi Chi, and Who's Who, in part because of my participation in die Honors Program. Ilie ACT prep course has proved invaluable to me. For a simple fee of S50.00, my parents and I have saved 58,000.00 intuition. Althou^ the results will not be the same for every student, I strongly believe that the ACT prep course is a necessary part of the community education program. It can make die difference from being conditionally admitted, to being unconditionally admitted. It has been my experience that diis can make a big difference for many students. Sincerely, J *March 7, 1996 Mrs. Pat Leach McClellan Community High School Office of Community Education 9417 Geyer Springs Road Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 Dear Pat: Thank you for teaching me Word Perfect 5.1 offered by the McClellan Community High School Office of Community Education. I wanted to tell you how much easier you have made my I can do a memo in less than ten minutes. workload. When I it took me camo to this position at HUD in November 1995, two hours, and I was wasting so much paper trying to learn. But when you told us about the \"magic\" key, (Fl) the first day you taught, it changed my whole life! came The class was fun. I also appreciated the individual time you gave to me when I did not understand how to do Your patience and calm voice were so much something, appreciated. Pat, be sure to tell Donna Larking that she was very good on She, also, gave us individual time our first day of class, to help us. Mrs. Roby's cookies were good, too! Sincerely, Carolyn Henry Multifamily Housing Representative Department of HUD I i 1/ cc: Mrs. Robyc 5 lUi a E o McClellan Community High School Office of Community Education 9417 Geyer Springs Road Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 Phone: (501) 570-4149 ol 111 BCl o 03 in \u0026lt;D McClellan Community Education is designed to develop a partnership between the school and community in order to provide educational opportunities and services to McClellan students, parents, other patrons. Little Rock School District employees, residents of Southwest Little Rock and neighboring communities.Through the process of community education the Community Education Office fosters community support for McClellan Community School and the Little Rock School District. Via planned programs and activities the Community Education Office enhances community involvement and coordinates an education service for the community.For information regarding currently offered Community Education courses or to suggest possible course offerings for the future, please contact our office located at 9417 Geyer Springs Road Littie Rock, Arkansas 72209 Phone: (501) 570-4149Willie J Edwards 9211 Oakgrove Ln Little Rock, Ar. 568-2887 pager 399-6111 Z/.y- '  rtB 2 .. 1995 CltiCO c! J\niirr. kuiuEianng 0 February 23,1995 Dr. Williams: I would to like to ask your help in a matter of great importance to me and a number ol other individuals. I have been with the McClellan Advisory Board since it's start .We have worked hard to bring about change for the better in our school and community. We had a wonderful relationship with the director and school board prior to August 93 In, or around, August of 93 the director, Malla Dagget, resigned. Brenda Scrimager was selected as the new director in December of 93. It was rumored then that this director, Brenda Scrimager, was telling different individuals that she would not work with this advisory board and counsel. It has become apparent that this rumor was true. Since Ms Scrimager was awarded this position, we have not had timely meetings and she has re\u0026amp;sed to follow bylaws, giving verbal degrading of advisory board and school administration and teachers that don't agree with her. It has come to light recently that the last board election was also rigged. I was informed today, February 23, at 8\np.m that she has now elected her own set of officers to help her proceed with her agenda. Please look into this matter because Community Education is one of the best things to come along in this district. Thanking you in advance, Willie J EdwardsL, i LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT John L. McClellan Community High School 9417 Geyer Springs Road  Phone 570-4100  Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 Era Lao H MEMORAKDCM TO: Advisory Council FROM Scrimager DATE: February 27,1995 MAR Ci'ica d 1995 :cc'? RE: Executive Council elections Whoops my fault, this memo was found under my desk - Im sending the results of the Executive Council elections. If you have any questions please call me at 570-4149, I thought some of you may have forgotten because I havent heard from you in such a long time. D fe'. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT f.-i'x\"' B E John L. McClellan Community High School 9417 Geyer Springs Road Phone 570-4100  Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 MEMORANDUM A a TO: Advisory Council members MAR - 1995 FROM: ^^^'l^enda Scrimager ICI DATE: January 15, 1995 RE: Board elections Listed below are the names of the new C.nmmunity Education Executive Board. President - Bobby Thomas Vice President - John Twyford Secretary - Paige Beavers Treasurer - Kelly TuckerMarch 1, 1995 OHic- Vi This is just a reminder that the next Advisory Council meeting will be Thursday March 16, 1995. The meeting will last from 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm in the Media Center.\nMlf f 9 1995 LPSL 'SUPTS OF\"ICE Oc: t1PP 09 35 10:11 QdWti  Mi '.liCi\"'':} / 254 FOl DRAFT I t i McClellan community education iPRooRAM  The District remains supportive of the' \"community school\" concept which links citizens and their schools together in wavs that are mutually beneficial.  n conanunity school  The District has provided full financial support for four years providing time for the maturation and development of potential community partnerships. As articulated at the inception of the program, the district was to sustain the concept for limited period (need to verify the exact nu^^ of years in original planning framework) while practice and outside financial resources were  I  The District will provide one additional year of financial support allowing additional time for the status of self-sufficiency to attained. This would provide a total developmental time period of five years which is adequate for the community education concept to be embraced, adopted, and supported by the gowmunity. i According to the budget figures produced by the community advisory council, anticipated r6Ve~iiz..----- tuition will meet or exceed ^50,000 council indicates a projected dtS^ approximately $90,000. inusfi^enerated from class/coursa \u0026gt; The community advisory ict operational budget of  The District will provide a budget of $40,000 to assist the commxxnity advisory council in the operation of the community education program for one additional year with the understanding that self-sufficiency must be attained by the 96-97 school year. program will remai.h housed at the McClellan High School. District will provide technical assistance to the Comunity Education Program in the form of grant writing expertise in securing funding sources. to assist review will take place mid-yelr so that all parties \" info-r-m-e-d-- -a-s- -t-o- --t-h-e- oprrooagrreessss bbeeiinnog mmaadn ea ktAowuaarv,d! achieving self-sufficiency status. The Distr4 will work with the McClellan Community Education to ensure that the integrity of the governance, and operations of the Community Education Program originally defined are recognized. Advisory -C structure, as ffencf. Little Rock School District MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Subject: Ann Brown, Federal Monitor Russ Mayo, Associate Superintendent jijtL August 15, 1995 Response to memorandum of August 9, 1995 4UG / 5 J995 Office of Dose^ The following is a response to your memorandum of August 9, 1995. My response to each of the three items is as follows: 1. We did not feel it necessary to do a plan modification for the McClellan Community School because all components of the program are being offered. We could find no reference to a minimum amount of money that must be budgeted for the program. Some money will come from other sources for this next school year. That which appears in our plan is more an historical account than specific action to be taken. The only exception is on page 94 as you 2. 3. have noted\nWe have reviewed page 94 of the desegregation plan relating to the McClellan Community School. The appropriate items from that page have been added to our list of obligations. I have requested a report of the status and progress of the McClellan Community School. When I receive it, 1 will forward it to you\nand. As noted in item 1 above, obligations relating to McClellan Community School have been added to the list. It now appears as a listing. If you have other questions, please let me know. C: Dr. Henry P. Williams, Superintendent Chris Heller, LRSD Attorney Jerry Malone, LRSD Attorney U.MCCLELDOCOffice of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 Date: August 9, 1995 To: From: Russ Mayo irown Subject: McClellan Community School As Im sure you know, the McClellan Community School program was incorporated into the current LRSD desegregation plan at the behest of the Little Rock School District Board of Directors, with the concurrence of the parties and the approval of the Court. As such, it is an important aspect of desegregation in the district. 111 appreciate the following current information about McClellan: 1. Please explain the statement, which appears in your July 13, 1994 memorandum to Dr. Williams, that \"McClellan was a reduction which does not require a plan change.\" 1 am puzzled by this assertion, because the desegregation plan clearly establishes McClellan as a community school, and court orders (for example, those of August 4, 1992 and December 30, 1992) have reemphasized the importance of the community school, the Advisory Council, and an adequate budget for the program. 2. Page 94 of the LRSD desegregation plan promises that ODM and other groups will regularly receive reports on the progress of the community school and any recommendations for changes. Please forward to me the school districts report on the status and progress of the McClellan Community School for the 1994-95 school year. 3. 1 note that the McClellan Community School is among those desegregation obligations that does not appear in your listing of \"Obligations from the Pulaski County Desegregation Case\" dated August 1995. Because the community school has been prominently featured in both the desegregation plan and court orders, please explain why it was omitted from your listing. Tlianks for your assistance. z c\u0026gt;z// e-/\u0026gt;/ Little Rock School District MEMORANDUM RECEIVED To: Ann Brown, Office of Desegregation Monitoring From: Russ Mayo, Associate Superintendent Date: September 5, 1995 Subject: McClellan Community School Report SEP 7 ms Office of Desegregaion Mcni\nipg Attached is the McClellan Community School Report you requested in your memorandum of August 9, 1995. C: Henry P. Williams, Superintendent Victor Anderson, Assistant Superintendent - Secondary PnnitaMcClellan Community Education Fiscal Year End Report for 1994/1995 Prepared August 16,1995 McClellan Community Education (MCE) has been in existence since the 1990-1991 school year. Initially a Three-Year Plan was developed which set for the goals of the program. Since its inception, MCE has provided a variety of programs and services to the community. By expanding the use of the school facility MCE as an anchor for the community. serves Program operations for 1994-95 were slightly impeded by the absence of an active director. Office personnel were challenged to maintain community support, input and participation. However, with the guidance and support of the McClellan Community School Advisory Council and a $265,000 grant to establish the Healthy Family Center (HFC) MCE was successful in its efforts toward these following goals: Goal 1. To enhance the educational format at McClellan through eradication of racial disparities on test scores. ACT Language taught by Shirley Ferguson with nine enrolled. ACT Math taught by Anita Henson with 15 enrolled. ACT Reading taught by Shirley Ferguson with 10 enrolled. ACT Science taught by Monica Parish with 16 enrolled. After school tutoring through HFC with 52 enrolled. Goal 2. To expand participation in Advisory Board. 8,000 class brochures mailed in the fall and spring announcing classes. 1,400 HFC monthly newsletters mailed announcing classes and services. 1,400 Summer Camp brochures mailed. 130 weekly MCE campus newsletters distributed on campus and to Advisory Board. Goal 3. To expand the use of the well-child clinic. Healthy Clinic renamed the Mala Daggett Health Clinic. Nurse Theresa Bour replaced by Karen Terry. Dr. Sam Schultz came for medical services on Tuesday afternoons. New COPE Representative is Mary Gupton who coordinates early childhood services. Established a new day care, IMAGE Day Care, at 65th and Butler. McClellan mothers and children were feed into the program. Day Care ran by Pastor Harville.Deborah Sweat, College of Nursing, come every other Friday for services, population and community of the goals and objectives of II Iw Qvl Offered classes taughf by local businessmen, community leaders, and senior citizens. Ron Walls taught Critical Thinking, Betty Turner taught Communications, Dr, James Parins taught Grant Writing, Rob Thrope taught Investments in the 9O's, Henry Rambert taught Ladies Car Maintenance, John Sanders taught Ballroom Dancing, Lisa Buckner taught Brochure Design, rack Carmichael taught Developing Your Child's Self-Esteem A _ I  . . X _  \u0026gt; a** * Caroline Stanley taught Diamonds Are a Girl's Best Friend Jan Dean taught Yoga, Clergy involved the Community Education and Pastor Harville, program are William Reids MCE Director attended PTSA meetings and fielded questions from PTSA members. Goal 5. To expand the use of the School's facilities. Increase the number of recreational classes. .,^11 K II L-  -------------- Recreational classes offered were volleyball, ballroom dancing and yoga. Established the HFC after school tutoring program. Held the 2 Cool 4 School Summer Day Camp on campus. Advertisement in class brochure for organizations, HFC, and PTSA. Task Force lifted canopy surrounding the auditorium, resurfaced the tennis court, and installed awnings on corridor walkways. successful in meeting some of its goals for the 1994-95 fiscal year. With meaningful input from the MCE Advisory Counal. collaboration with local businesses and organizations, and the support of the McClellan Community School and its patrons, MCE is currently in the process of establishing objectives for the 1995-96 fiscal year. Holding to the principle that education is our most valuable resource and believing that the educative process is the most important means of meeting individual and community needs MCE has conducted evaluation of campus resources. an II?patrons enroll in our computer courses. This requires that we have the most up-to-date computer technology available. Currently this is not the case. Attached is a needs request which was presented by the McClellan Business Department. Prior to the change in leadership for MCE, 15 computers were ordered (P.O. attached). This purchase order was cancelled however without Principal Jodie Carter's knowledge by the previous director. As a result of this action, MCE will be impaired in its delivery of services. an Since this time the McClellan Community Advisory Board has selected interim director. With the assistance of the MCE staff, HCF staff, McClellan Community School and the input, support and participation of the community, Marion Baldwin, Interim Director, is dedicated to the challenge of putting community education back on track.CKM ATTACHMENT 1 Little Rock School District In order to upgrade the McClellan Business Department, we need the following: Replace two computer labs with computers with 8 memory - Total number of computers in lab - 45 computers - Cost of each computer approximately $2,000 each. Printers Color and Laser 8 Printers - Approximate cost $10,000 Third Lab - Replace 12 computers - $2,000 each Two keyboarding rooms - Transfer equipment in the two labs to the two keyboarding rooms. (six new printers needed - Cost $2,000) Junior Executive Training and Marketing Classroom - Add ten computers Cost $2,000 for each computer Add four printers - Cost $1,400 New software needed for all classrooms - Cost approximately $5,000 ****** We do not meet the minimum standards required by the state of Arkansas. We must have memory of 8 or above to meet standards, teach WordPerfect 6.1 to meet standards. Also, we must At the present time, we have 80 computers, meet the required standards. Only eight of the computers 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501)374-3361LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 'encoi E37 INVOlCeiN TRIPLICATE TO: LITTLE ROCK4OMOOL DISTRICT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 10 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 INfHUmES PERTAaiMa TO THIS ORDER , i KaaetMtcmnmtPUKCH/iSiNG V^_,lRTMeNT. LITTLC ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, tseo t STHSTRerr. LITTLE ROCK, AR 72202, PHONE NUMR (901) 324-2230.  SEE TERMS ANO CONDITIONS BELOW u PURCHASE ORDE P/0 75001'19' IMPORTANT PURCHASE ORDER NUMBE MUST APPEAR ON ALL INVOICES, PACKAGES AND CORRESPONDENCE TO\nCOMPUTER WAREHOUSE 4000 LANDERS Rd AD S'.'171: 0 NORTH L.ITTLE ROCK. AR ^SHIP TO: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPPLY CENTER WAREHOUSE 1000 EAST SIXTH STREET DATE: 'ai 1? 525 LITTLE ROCK. AR (301) 324-2230 TuhN JEFFERS (Dellvwy Houra 8:M AM-3:30 PM) ATTN: COMMUNITY ED REQUIRED: 6/01/9S SHIP\nFOB LITTLE ROCK REQ: OOOO0O7B5 lANiT*  Ol'AN . I v r rnnt  I DESCRIPTION I DISCOUNT T UNIT PRICE TOTAL: 1 EA 1.74Q,0000 \u0026lt;?6 . 20.00 CWI ^i8S- i.N COMPUTERS, TOWER VERSION EA 99.0000 1 ,^85.00 SOUNDBLAS \"ER 16 VALUE EDITION 15 EA .0000 1,1Q5.00 CSlOOO tech speaker KIT EA 19.9500 299,25  AVI-CSIO u TECH HEADPHONE KIT ** T95-133 *** -4.^ Sub Total Taxes . 1 \"3^ '5 1,751.26 Pd. TOTAL 30,940.61 **********+ ORDER MUST BE IN ONE SHIPMENT, RECEIVED . INVOICE RECEIVED NO LATER THAN 6/9/95 IF YOU SHOULD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE call, r- rrv AT (501) 324-2260. THANKS   ACCOUNT 16.00.00.3100.01 \u0026lt;560 AMOUNT 30,940.61 AS, CONDITIONS \u0026amp; INSTRUCTIONS: T'-f%rchaae vaNd only arhen signed by Director of Purchasing. 2. Goods to be deMvarad F.O.B. as per address in SHIP TO block. 3. Order may be cancaSarf lor poor delivery or if items are not as specified. 4. District will not honor any commitment made without a purchase order. 0. 5. Priof Io Of Included with shipment, please send Material Safety Data Shaal^^^lproducts conuinino haierdout aubatances or shipment may be refused. \u0026gt;' '.\u0026lt;ye * 'A. -  -____. _________.uB /A T 6. Pnce increase or iocreaees in shipping cost in excess of $25 above total P.O. must receive prior school district approval. 7 Do not overship or substitute without prior Purchasing Department approval SCHOOL/DEPT. COPY APPROVED Purchasing Director mBBB s Al lAunntivi J LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT John L. McClellan Community High School 9417 Geyer Springs Road Phone 570-4100 * Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Dr. Vic Anderson, Associate Superintendent Secondary Schools Little Rock School District Jodie Carter, Principal McClellan Community High School August 16,1995 McClellan Community Education Director's Position The McClellan Community School Executive Board met Monday, August 14, 1995 and determined that Marion Baldwin will be the Interim Director. Advertisement for the Director's position will begin so that the vacancy may be filled. c: Dr. Richard Hurley, Director Human Resources RECE!V='' ***4$^ SEP ii I 1995 Office of Desegregation Monitoring ROCK SCHOOL !' DISTRICT John L. McClellan Community High School 9417 Geyer Springs Road Phone 570-4100  Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 AGENDA McClellan Community School Advisory Council Meeting Monday, September 25,1995 6:00 p.m. McClellan Media Center 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Vote on Potential Board Members (Mitchell Moore, Leatrice Russ, Charley, Hilton, Jr., Loletha Wilkins, Herbert Louks, Dudda Sanders) 4 Director's Report inclusive of Financial Report 5. Re-establish Committees 6. Tailgate Party Summary 7. Report on $50,000.00 City Grant 8. Report on Task Force Monies ($5,000.00) 9. Memorial for Mahlon Martin to SVIMC Cancer Center William Fields Kelly Tucker Nancy Reedy Willie Edwards Rosemary Lawson Bobby Thomas Jo Powell 4. EXTENDED EVALUATION of the MCCLELLAN COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL BUSINESS/COMMUNICATIONS MAGNET PROGRAM November 13, 1995 PROGRAM PBSCRIPTION PURPOSE The Business/Communications Magnet Program at McClellan Community High School was developed in the spring of 1992 as a means of achieving the desegregation goals of both the school and the Little Rock School District. The business/communications theme was selected because of McClellans already-existing business program, the largest in the district. The program was designed to serve students in McClellans attendance zone, students from other LRSD attendance zones, and students in the North Little Rock and Pulaski County Special School Districts. The program seeks to provide students with a comprehensive and equitable educational program that will 1) lead to a thorough knowledge of business and communications concepts, and 2) provide marketable skills in various fields of business and communications. SCOPE AND CONTENT McClellans Business/Communications Magnet Program actually consists of two separate programs of study: one in business and one in communications. However, since these two areas share many concepts and skills, several courses fall into both areas. Each of the two programs contains three strands from which students may choose. Although the strands share many of the same courses, there is enough difference to allow students to explore their specific interests. The three strands in the Business Magnet Program are:  Business FYinciples and Management  Marketing and Advertising  Economics and Finance The three strands in the Communications Magnet Program are:  Oral Communications  Written Communications  Visual/Product Communications In each of the six strands, students must complete prerequisites (1 unit), requirements (3/4 to 4 units), and electives (1to 2 units). There is a recommended, year by year plan for completing7 McClellan Magnet Page 2 these courses. If a student completes the 1 unit of prerequisites and 5'/4 units of required and elective courses, he/she is declared a magnet completer. The title \"Magnet Graduate\" is then placed on the diploma and final transcript, and the student wears a white cord with their graduation gown, signifying completion of a special course of study. PARTICIPANTS/BENEFICIARIES Any McClellan student may enter the Business/Communications Magnet Program providing they show interest in the program and voice their intent to complete a magnet strand. (If a students admittance into the program would cause the racial balance to go out of established boundaries, their name would be put on a waiting list\nthey can still enroll in magnet classes.) Students from outside McClellans attendance zone as well as students from the North Little Rock and Pulaski County Special School Districts may enter the program. At this time, however, only white students from these areas may enroll in the program due to the fact that McClellans overall racial balance is out of compliance with current guidelines. There are currently 203 students enrolled in the program, with 32 seniors, 112 juniors, and 59 sophomores. The racial balance is 58.6% black and 41.4% white. PROGRAM GOAL There are two program goals, or objectives, to be dealt with in this extended evaluation. 1. 2. The magnet component of the program will result in the further desegregation of the school by attracting M-to-M and out-of-zone students to the program.\" \"The costs incurred in the delivery of the magnet program are outweighed by the benefits of participation rates in the magnet program and the achievement of the participants.\" EVALUATION CRITERIA Evaluation criteria for this extended evaluation are whether each of the above program goals can be demonstrated to be in the affirmative.  McClellan Magnet Page 3 EVALUATION RESULTS Evaluation results reflect data gathered from several sources. These data have been compiled and analyzed and yield the following results, presented in correspondence with each of the previously stated program goals (objectives). OBJECTIVE 1 \"The magnet component of the program will result in the further desegregation of the school by attracting M-to-M and out-of-zone students to the program.\" TABLE 1 M-to-M and Out-of-Zone Students at McClellan (Fall, 1995)* Black White Total Out-of-Zone 98 31 129 M-to-M (NLR) 1 0 1 M-to-M (PCSSD) 7 7 0 Total 98 39 137 from Student Assignment statistics (11/8/95) and the Board of Directors Meeting Agenda (10/26/95) DISCUSSION Table 1 shows that McClellan has attracted 137 M-to-M and out-of-zone students for the current semester. Of 177 non-black students enrolled at McClellan this fall, 39 (22%) of them have been attracted from other attendance zones or from out of the district. The total of 98 out-of- zone black students is curious, given that McClellans black percentage would be out of compliance even if the only black students enrolled were from the schools attendance zone. If these 98 out-of-zone black students had not been placed at McClellan, the schools black percentage would stand at 78% instead of the current 80%.McClellan Magnet Page 4 OBJECTIVE 2 \"The costs incurred in the delivery of the magnet program are outweighed by the benefits of participation rates in the magnet program and the achievement of the participants.\" Part A: Participation Rates TABLE 2 Participation Rates in McClellans Magnet Program for Each Year of Existence October 1992 57 October 1993 67 October 1994 150 October 1995 203 TABLE 3 October 1 Enrollment Figures for McClellan Since 1990 1990 1023 1991 1000 1992* 985 1993 886 1994 897 1995 904 First year of Magnet Program TABLE 4 October 1 Enrollment Figures for Other LRSD Area High Schools 1993 1994 1995 Central 1879 1637 1591 Fair 918 917 905 Hall 976 1031 928McClellan Magnet Page 5 Discussion, Part A McClellans Magnet Program continues to grow in popularity. Table 2 shows that enrollment in the program has almost quadrupled in the 3*/i years of its existence. Table 3 shows that a downward trend in McClellans enrollment ended soon after the inception of the magnet program and the extensive recruitment efforts related to it. While McClellan has enjoyed a slight increase in enrollment since 1993, the other LRSD area high schools have all shown a decrease, as seen in Table 4. Part B: Achievement of the Participants 1. McClellans overall scores on the Stanford Achievement Test have shown a general improvement since the Magnet Program began in the 1992-1993 school year. TABLE 5 McClellan Stanford Achievement Test Scores, Comparison Data for 1993-1995 10th Gr. BASIC BATTERY lOth Gr. COMPLETE BATTERY 1993 1994 1995 1993 1994 1995 Black 38.7 41.1 39.6 37.4 39.6 39.6 White 53.5 47.1 55.2 53.6 47.8 56.4 Overall 42.8 42.0 43.7 41.7 41.8 43.8 nth Gr. BASIC BATTERY nth Gr. COMPLETE BATTERY 1993 1994 1995 1993 1994 1995 Black White Overall 36.8 50.4 41.5 37.8 53.6 41.9 39.9 52.3 42.9 36.2 50.8 41.1 36.7 53.4 41.1 39 51 42McClellan Magnet Page 6 2. The Magnet Program has contributed to the honors and awards won by McClellan, its teachers, and its students. School Honors On December 2, 1995, McClellan will be named the recipient of the prestigious National Programs of Excellence in Business Education Award. Competing with schools from across the country, McClellan was chosen as the outstanding example of quality in business education in the United States for 1995. This award that names McClellan as the top business education high school in the country for 1995 will be presented at the national convention of the American Vocational Association in Denver. Teacher Honors McClellans Stephens Award winners for 1993 and 1994 were teachers in the Magnet Program. The innovative methods used in their magnet courses - Economics 1 \u0026amp; 11, Marketing, and Marketing Management - are part of the reason these teachers were singled out for these awards. Several Teacher of the Year awards have been shared by three McClellan magnet teachers since 1992. There have been five state level awards: Business Teacher of the Year, Vocational Teacher of the Year, Marketing Teacher of the Year, New Business Teacher of the Year, and New Vocational Teacher of the Year. There have been three national level awards: Region IV American Vocational Teacher of the Year, Region IV New Vocational Teacher of the Year, and Southern Business Education Teacher of the Year. Student Honors Involvement in the Magnet Program or in magnet classes has contributed to the success of several students and student groups. In 1994 and 1995, students in the magnet course Junior Executive Training have won first place honors at the Arkansas Executive Business Games. McClellans chapter of the Future Business Leaders of America is the largest chapter in Arkansas and it has won more awards than any other state chapter for the past several years. All FBLA members are involved to some degree in magnet courses\nalmost all magnet students are members. At the National FBLA Conference in 1994 and 1995, the skills students have gained in their magnet courses have contributed to the winning of several awards, including the award for top Annual Business Report in the country for 1995. Since the inception of the Magnet Programs, magnet students have used their business skills to achieve leadership positions in FBLA on the district and state level: District VIII president (twice), vice president, and parliamentarian\nand state vice president (twice) and president. National honors for individuals have gone to two students involved in the magnet program. In both 1994 and 1995, McClellan students were named the National Region 4 Outstanding Business Education Student by the American Vocational Association.McClellan Magnet Page 7 McClellan magnet students are also achieving on another level. Magnet teachers have received feedback numerous times through letters or phone calls as to the high skill levels found in their students. Employers tend to find McClellan magnet students better prepared for the workplace, both in business skills and human relations skills. Discussion, Part B As shown in Table 5, for the three years since the magnet program began, Stanford Achievement Test scores at McClellan have improved. The magnet program has in all probability contributed to this improvement. The substantial amount of equipment and materials brought into the school with the magnet program has benefited not only magnet students, but also a majority of nonmagnet students. A great many non-magnet students enroll in magnet courses, and almost every McClellan student benefits from the magnet computer labs. Increased levels of learning  and thus increased test scores ~ may be directly related to the magnet-funded equipment and materials. The entire student body is reaping the benefits of magnet funding. The magnet program has also contributed to an increase in school honors. For a young program such as McClellans to win a national award for excellence is a testament to the hard work and dedication of the magnet teachers and staff. Word of the program has spread statewide, and now nationwide. This positive reputation draws attention to McClellan teachers and students and may contribute to their selection as honorees in various categories. With the upcoming national award, this winning trend should continue and increase. OBSTACLES TO GOAL ATTAINMENT OBJECTIVE 1 \"The magnet component of the program will result in the further desegregation of the school by attracting M-to-M and out-of-zone students to the program.\" This objective has been met to a small degree. Perhaps the biggest obstacle to attaining this goal was the high percentage of black students already present at McClellan at the inception of the magnet program in 1992. McClellan has had the highest percentage of black students of all LRSD high schools since 1990. This results mainly from the fact that McClellans attendance zone is heavily black. A year before the magnet program began, Student Assignment reported that McClellans satellite zone was 100% black and the remainder of McClellans zone wasMcClellan Magnet Page 8 around 65% black. It is understandable, then, that when the magnet program began in 1992, McClellans black population was at 67%. At that time, however. Central, Hall, and Parkview were still below the 60% level. Because other LRSD high schools had a more racially balanced population, the out-of-zone and out-of-district white parents may have simply refused to consider McClellan as a viable choice. As the percentage of black students in McClellans attendance zone, and thus at the school, has continued to grow, white parents from other zones and districts may continue to ignore McClellan as a choice for their children. Since McClellans attendance zone is saturated, with no room for new housing developments, and since there is a trend in the zone toward an increasing black population, this obstacle will become more and more difficult to overcome. McClellans current black population stands at 80%. To reduce its black component to even 65%, McClellan would have to attract about 210 additional white students from other zones and districts. This would be difficult for even the strongest magnet program. Unfortunately, McClellans magnet program has recently been weakened. Other LRSD high schools may now offer the courses Desktop Publishing / and II, two of the specialty courses that originally set McClellans program apart from other schools. At the same time, nothing has been added to the McClellan magnet curriculum to replace the loss of these two courses. This reduces the attraction of the McClellan program, providing another reason why parents would not look to McClellan as a choice. As more technology becomes available to all high schools, this trend will most probably continue. Much of McClellans current magnet curriculum may eventually be available at the other LRSD high schools. Unless a policy is adopted of continually adding new or more advanced courses to the McClellan magnet program, the program will eventually have no drawing power at all. A weakened magnet program and an attendance zone with a high black component: These are two serious obstacles to the achievement of Objective 1. OBJECTIVE 2 \"The costs incurred in the delivery of the magnet program are outweighed by the benefits of participation rates in the magnet program and the achievement of the participants.\" McClellan has been successful in increasing participation rates in the Business/Communications Magnet Program. Its magnet students - and non-magnet students -- have found success on many levels. However, many of the same obstacles to Objective 1 also apply here. Part A: Participation Rates At the time of the magnet programs inception in 1992, McClellans high black component (67 %) mirrored the black component of McClellans attendance zone (above 65 %). If McClellan had originally been given a more racially balanced attendance zone, and had thus kicked off theMcClellan Magnet Page 9 new magnet program with a racial balance similar to Central, Hall, or Parkview, one could speculate that more white parents from outside the zone and district might have considered McClellan as a viable choice. As already stated, this attendance zone problem continues to be detrimental to McClellan today. Part B: Achievement of the Participants Many factors, from state-of-the-art equipment to hard-working teachers and students, have contributed to the achievement thus far of McClellans magnet participants. As stated previously, this success has spread to the entire school. The hard work will continue, but the unbalance attendance zone and the weakened program may make it more difficult to attract students into the program. These weak areas will eventually begin to diminish success levels. RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendation 1 It is recommended that McClellans attendance zone be adjusted in such a way as to bring its black component more into line with the attendance zones of the other LRSD area high schools. OBJECTIVE The objective of Recommendation 1 is to provide McClellan with a more racially balanced attendance zone. Evaluation Criterion Evaluation criterion for this objective is whether McClellans attendance zone becomes more racially balanced. Expected Benefits McClellan will have an attendance zone with a racial balance more in line with the other LRSD area high schools. This new zone make-up will result in a more racially balanced student population for McClellan. This will in turn be an additional selling point for the school and its magnet programs. With a continuation of McClellans rigorous recruitment program, the racial balance of the school should experience even more improvement. Impact Analysis This recommendation will support the Desegregation Plan by providing McClellan with anMcClellan Magnet Page 10 attendance zone with a racial balance that is more in line with the other LRSD area high schools. This change in zones would most certainly be unpopular with the schools which would lose students. There is the argument, of course, that McClellans zone has been unbalanced from the beginning, and that McClellans extremely high black percentage demands quick and perhaps severe action. Risks of taking this recommendation include the possibility of patrons who are unhappy at the thought of their children attending McClellan. McClellans rigorous recruitment program, already in place, could offset much of these complaints. The risk of not taking this recommendation is that the racial balance of McClellans attendance zone will continue in the same direction, making the task of desegregating the school even more difficult. Resources Analysis Implementing this recommendation would take much study and planning by a number of district personnel. Board members, and possibly patrons. Force Field Analysis The primary supporters of this recommendation would be the staff of McClellan and the people of Southwest Little Rock. There is a large degree of unity in the neighborhoods of Southwest Little Rock, and these citizens could be mobilized to support this move. The main forces against this recommendation, of course, would be the schools that would lose students, as well as some of the parents whose children would be involved. The first force could be dealt with by comparing the racial balance of the other schools with the racial balance of McClellan\nthe fairness of this recommendation would be difficult to argue with. The second force could be influenced or won over by McClellans recruitment efforts. General Implementation Plan The officials assigned to carry out this recommendation would need to look at several possible ways of altering McClellans attendance zone, listing the benefits and drawbacks of each. Viewpoints of the principals of affected schools would need to be sought. Public forums might be held. Recomipendation. 2 It is recommended that the LRSD adopt a policy by which a new magnet course will be added to a schools magnet curriculum when one of their existing magnet courses is put into the general course offerings of the LRSD.McClellan Magnet Page 11 OBJECTIVE The objective of Recommendation 2 is to maintain or increase the ability of magnet programs to attract out-of-zone and M-to-M students. Evaluation Criterion Evaluation criterion for this objective is whether this policy is successful in maintaining/ strengthening magnet programs so that they remain attractive to out-of-zone and M-to-M students. Expected Benefits Magnet programs will continue to grow and be strengthened, allowing them to attract new students. Impact Analysis The most important positive impact of this recommendation is that magnet programs will be maintained or strengthened, allowing them to continue to attract out-of-zone and M-to-M students. This will support the Desegregation Plan. The risk of not taking this recommendation is that the LRSD may appear to be purposely weakening magnet programs which the courts have set up to further the desegregation efforts. Resources Analysis At McClellan, no new personnel will be needed unless there is major growth in the size of the student body. Existing magnet staff would teach any new courses. Many McClellan magnet teachers welcome the chance to take further training needed for new curriculum demands. The cost of new magnet courses would vary depending on many factors. The fact that a new magnet course is being added, according to this recommendation, means that a previous magnet course is now being expanded to all schools. The district should consider the cost of adding a new magnet course at the same time that they consider the cost of expanding an existing magnet course to all schools. Force Field Analysis The primary supporters of this recommendation will be magnet school personnel and supporters. These people should be enthusiastic about the chance for their program to grow. The primary detractors may be LRSD officials concerned about the costs of adding to the magnet curriculum. These costs, of course, can be avoided by choosing not to expand magnet courses to all schools.McClellan Magnet Page 12 General Implementation Plan When the LRSD considers expanding a magnet course to all schools, the magnet program from which the course is taken should be notified and asked to propose ideas for new courses to replace the course. The regular guidelines for new course proposals  form, timelines, etc. -- would be used.  Business Case is recommended___yes___no  Plan modification is recommended___yes___no  Overall recommendations are likely to have what type of budgetary impact: No budgetary impact___ Increased costs___ Decreased costs___G/- John L. McClellan Community High School A Business and Communications Magnet School RECESVFH FEB 7 1996 Principal\nJodie T. Carter Assistant Principals: Brenda Graham Everett Hawks Cherrie Walker Office of Desegregation Monitoring Dear Parents: The time has come! You and your freshman must decide which high school will best meet your needs. Academic offerings, specialty courses, athletic programs - these are all important factors to examine. How does McClellan rate in these areas? Academically, McClellan is equal to any high school in Arkansas. Our Honors Programs  Advanced Placement courses in English, American History, European History, Biology, and French, as well as Honors classes in several subject areas - thoroughly prepare students for success in college. Several of our teachers have won Stephens Awards for excellence in the classroom, and we have several winners of national and state teacher-of-the-year awards. McClellan is academically sound! McClellans Business/Marketing Department was recently chosen as the top program in the nation for 1995-96! This award reflects the advanced and comprehensive instruction available in computers, business concepts, and communications that is available from our Business/Communications Magnet Program. This program has value for all students, regardless of their plans after high school. Knowledge of computers and good written and oral communication skills are necessary for success in almost any college endeavor or career. Our Magnet Program provides these skills. Well-equipped and well-staffed, this program has proven invaluable to many of our graduates. The strength of our athletic program is shown by recent Conference Championships in football, basketball, girls volleyball, and girls track. Our teams also compete successfully on the state level\nwe were State Champion Runners-Up in basketball (1993) and football (1994), and we are currently ranked near the top in the state in basketball. In addition to athletic skill, our coaches also teach character, as evidenced by our winning of the 1994 Conference Sportsmanship Award. Please examine the enclosed materials\nsee if McClellan might be the place for you. Call us at 570-4121 to schedule a visit or to talk to teachers, parents, or students. We want you to learn firsthand what McClellan Magnet High School can offer you! Sincerely, Steve Geurin Magnet Coordinator 9417 Geyer Springs Road  Little Rock, Arkansas 72209  Phone 570-4100McClellan The Three Business Magnet Programs Means Business! THE POWER OF CHOICE... Every choice is the right choice when McClellan magnet students select an area of study. With six magnet strands to choose from in the fields of Business and Communications, McClellan students can spend their time exploring possibilities instead of facing limitations. 1 Business Principles \u0026amp; Management For careers and college study in business ownership and management, accounting, financial services, etc. Students take these required courses:  Computer Tech: Business Applications  Computerized Accounting I  Introduction to Business  Junior Executive Training 2 Marketing \u0026amp; Advertising For careers and college study in retail management, advertising, sales, marketing research, media, etc. 3 For careers and college study in banking, accounting, stocks and bonds, financial services, etc. Students take these required courses:  Economics I \u0026amp; II  Junior Executive Training  Money \u0026amp; Banking  Computer Tech: Business Applications  Introduction to Business THE POWER OF KNOWLEDGE... With over 225 computers on campus, many of which are networked in state-of-the-art labs, McClellan provides a potential for learning that is unlimited. McClellan Business Magnet graduates-with their high degree of computer literacy and business sense-have more power in the tough world of higher education and careers. Elective courses include:  Business Law  Advanced Desktop Publishing  At FBLA GOALS UTIL1ZEO Students take these required  Advertising  Fashion Merchandising  Introduction to Business  Marketing  Marketing Management courses: Elective courses include:  International Business \u0026amp; Banking  Computer Tech: Database FIND OUT MORE... Call McClellan's Magnet Coordinator at 570-4121, or visit our campus at 9417 Geyer Springs Road. We think you'll be pleasantly surprised! Jt Elective courses include:  Business Etiquette  Entrepreneurship All magnet courses are available to any interested McClellan student. Enter The The Three Communications Magnet Programs Communications f EVERY CHILD IS DIFFERENT... Parents have always known it. Now at McClellan, we're addressing this fact by offering Communications Magnet programs in written, oral, and visual communications. Based on their own individual preferences, students can choose an area of study that will help them express their unique ideas in an exciting and productive way. A WELL-ROUNDED EDUCATION... Whether experiencing the excitement of broadcasting with our daily students-produced television news program, cultivating writing skills in our Communications Writing Lab, or creating works of art in our screenprinting/airbrush studio, McClellan Communications Magnet student are never at a loss for exciting educational activities. When combined with our Advanced Placement and Gifted \u0026amp; Talented courses, plus our in-depth computer curriculum, the Communications Magnet Program produces students who know how to communicate for success.! !\\ k I .1 . i 0 . 1 Written Communications For careers and college study in advertising, law, journalism, television production, technical writing, etc. Students take these required courses:  Journalism I  Journalism II  Technical or Creative Writing  Word Processing I \u0026amp; II Elective courses include:  Mass Media Independent Study  Desktop Publishing All magnet courses are available to any interested McClellan student. 2 Oral Communications For careers and college study in television and radio, public relations, law, speech pathology, interpreting, etc. Students take these required courses:  Communications I  Public Speaking  Drama I  Mass Media I \u0026amp; II Elective courses include:  Drama II  Debate s 3 Visual/Product Communications For careers and college study in commercial or graphic art, advertising, interior design, architecture etc. Students take these required courses:  Art Design/Graphic Design  Advertising  Introduction to Painting  Mass Media I \u0026amp; 11  Introduction to Art Elective courses include:  Architectural Drafting  Screen Printing/Airbrush John L. McClellan Community High School A Business and Communications Magnet School Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Non-Profit Organization U.S. Postage PAID Permit No. 2608 Little Rock, AR BROWN, JONATHAN M 1201 WELCH ST LITTLE ROCK AR 72202 i 11 It iiII II IIi! IlHililliiliilllllilllilJohn L. McClellan Community High School A Business and Communications Magnet School RECEIVES? fcrr.- FEB 7 1996 Principal: Jodie T, Carter Assistant Principals: Brenda Graham Everett Hawks Cherrie Walker Office of DesegregaiiOii Moniionng fcuJb. . Dear Parents: The time has come! You and your freshman must decide which high school will best meet your needs. Academic offerings, specialty courses, athletic programs - these are all important factors to examine. How does McClellan rate in these areas? Academically, McClellan is equal to any high school in Arkansas. Our Honors Programs - Advanced Placement courses in English, American History, European History, Biology, and French, as well as Honors classes in several subject areas - thoroughly prepare students for success in college. Several of our teachers have won Stephens Awards for excellence in the classroom, and we have several winners of national and state teacher-of-the-year awards. McClellan is academically sound! McClellans Business/Marketing Department was recently chosen as the top program in the nation for 1995-96! This award reflects the advanced and comprehensive instruction available in computers, business concepts, and communications that is available from our Business/Communications Magnet Program. This program has value for all students, regardless of their plans after high school. Knowledge of computers and good written and oral communication skills are necessary for success in almost any college endeavor or career. Our Magnet Program provides these skills. Well-equipped and well-staffed, this program has proven invaluable to many of our graduates. The strength of our athletic program is shown by recent Conference Championships in football, basketball, girls volleyball, and girls track. Our teams also compete successfully on the state level\nwe were State Champion Runners-Up in basketball (1993) and football (1994), and we are cunently ranked near the top in the state in basketball. In addition to athletic skill, our coaches also teach character, as evidenced by our winning of the 1994 Conference Sportsmanship Award. Please examine the enclosed materials\nsee if McClellan might be the place for you. Call us at 570-4121 to schedule a visit or to talk to teachers, parents, or students. We want you to learn firsthand what McClellan Magnet High School can offer you! Sincerely, Steve Geurin Magnet Coordinator 9417 Geyer Springs Road Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 Phone 570-4100rj McClellan 77ze Three Business Magnet Programs Means Business! THE POWER OF CHOICE... Every choice is the right choice when McClellan magnet students select an area of study. With six magnet strands to choose from in the fields of Business and Communications, McClellan students can spend their time exploring possibilities instead of facing limitations. THE POWER OF KNOWLEDGE... With over 225 computers on campus, many of which are networked in state-of-the-art labs, McClellan provides a potential for learning that is unlimited. McClellan Business Magnet graduates-with their high degree of computer literacy and business sense-have more power in the tough world of higher education and careers. FIND OUT MORE... Call McClellan's Magnet Coordinator a t 570-4121, or visit our campus at $417 Geyer Springs Road. We think you'll be pleasantly surprised! 1 Business Principles \u0026amp; Management For careers and college study in business ownership and management, accounting, financial services, etc. Students take these required courses:  Computer Tech: Business Applications  Computerized Accounting I  Introduction to Business  Junior Executive Training Elective courses include:  Business Law  Advanced Desktop Publishing All magnet courses are available to any interested McClellan student. 1 SVC j - i I i 2 Pag, ieit 2 Marketing \u0026amp; Advertising For careers and college study in retail management, advertising, sales, marketing research, media, etc. Students take these required courses:  Advertising  Fashion Merchandising  Introduction to Business  Marketing  Marketing Management Elective courses include:  Business Etiquette  Entrepreneurship 3 For careers and college study in banking, accounting, stocks and bonds, financial services, etc. Students take these required courses:  Economics I \u0026amp; II  Junior Executive Training  Money \u0026amp; Banking  Computer Tech: Business Applications  Introduction to Business Elective courses include:  International Business \u0026amp; Banking  Computer Tech\nDatabase CLUB /McClellan Means Business! THE POWER OF CHOICE... Every choice is the right choice when McClellan magnet students select an area of study. With six magnet strands to choose from in the fields of Business and Conununications, McClellan students can spend their time exploring possibilities instead of facing limitations. THE POWER OF KNOWLEDGE... With over 225 computers on campus, many of which are networked in state-of-the-art labs, McClellan provides a potential for learning that is unlimited. McClellan Business Magnet graduates-with their high degree of computer literacy and business sense-have more power in the tough world of higher education and careers. FIND OUT MORE... Call McClellan's Magnet Coordinator at 570-4121, or visit our campus at 9417 Geyer Springs Road. We think you'll be pleasantiy surprised! 1 The Three Business Magnet Programs Business Principles \u0026amp; Management For careers and college study in business ownership and management, accounting, financial services, etc. Students take these required courses:  Computer Tech: Business Applications  Computerized Accounting 1  Introduction to Business  Junior Executive Training Elective courses include:  Business Law  Advanced Desktop Publishing FBLA GOALS UTILIZED MM All magnet courses are available to any interested McClellan student. 2 Marketing \u0026amp; Advertising For careers and college study in retail management, advertising, sales, marketing research, media, etc. Students take these required courses:  Advertising  Fashion Merchandising  Introduction to Business  Marketing  Marketing Management Elective courses Include:  Business Etiquette  Entrepreneurship 3 For careers and college study in banking, accounting, stocks and bonds, financial services, etc. Students take these required courses:  Economics I \u0026amp; II  Junior Executive Training  Money \u0026amp; Banking  Computer Tech: Business Applications  Introduction to Business Elective courses include:  International Business \u0026amp; Banking  Computer Tech: Database CLDB ... ' LRSD ADMIN. BULDING Fax:1-501-324-2032 May 20 96 17:07 P. 01/01 PRESS RELEASE 'J 4 PRESS RELEASE Jai.i fcjr\nLe firs^ annuv1 H'? * ?\nIT \"ration SatvrJ.^ June 8. 1935 4.1 cm s .rri. tc 5 0 . m . .rstfi'pue -Ciallar. 'ctiTi'.nuni cy Klah -ocated 4 L. (^ay^y 'if .OC 31C''uO   ,6 Ai'kc ij  MCcXC.\\ Wn^r,. *?!*? .a, -.'cpartm-ent ey Sapr.ist rr/j z of Hirr\u0026gt;-*.r i srv-ces, ci Health. Baptist\n4edina 0*\" Cftvrch, ano \"a.nv o *er aganc: . .. e R'\nc .ci-ocl Lx.at\"-.. .: through ^he Healthy Frirr'  \\ er.tt'rgsncy gra f unc7\nnograr. of * 5. Eepar ,!ie. J-or Drug Iree Sch 'Ol? shq CorT..'.n j .. provioe f r .i n fcieakf.i sjf I nd 2u2Z^\\ !vi nun\n, matrons.. :3 J rh i.'*. ! i. a  r-Rf\n'. t, certification. and ex.\n. th r f :: n f\u0026lt;z !: i on adou t ser'/t ces I zivs-z to Ij.it t:2e Rc^k Fi-Oi Co LhS'  rrst regi strance. Door px,23 very honr. Be eur to jom the Healthy 3*iffi.Uy uelehr atxon on Saturday, June 8, 199s KdClellan Coiiuaunlty High Sehool. sen Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham. Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 Date: January 25, 1995 To: Jodie Carter, Principal, McClellan High School From: Horace Smith, Associate Monitor, Office of Desegregation Monitoring Subject: Magnet Program Information As part of ODMs ongoing monitoring of secondary schools with magnet programs, I would like to receive the following information regarding the McClellan High School Business/ Communications Magnet Program by Friday, February 10, 1995. If you have any questions or concerns, please dont hesitate to call me at 376-6200. Thank you for your assistance. Documentation Requested  For each year since the programs inception, magnet program enrollment by race, sex, and grade level.  1994-95 magnet program course enrollments by course title, race, sex, and classification.  For each year since the programs inception, the number of students new to the school attracted as a direct result of the magnet program by race, sex, and grade level.  1994-95 magnet program staff by race, sex, and the title of the magnet courses they teach.  Furnish an existing comprehensive magnet program description (e.g. philosophy, goals, objectives, structure, curriculum) and any literature describing individual course offerings.  Documentation of yearly recruitment activities by the school (e.g. recruitment committee meetings, presentations, site visits to the school by potential parents and students, recruitment visits by staff to other schools) since the programs inception.,7 Sc? 1 J f995 Office of Oese3rs33i\ncii (viociionny ^OU /:\\(Ze COlSPiALLV iNAZireP ro COMl Ff^z\u0026gt;A^, C^PT. 15, 6:00 T^.H. e\u0026gt;y \u0026gt;iC:LCLAtj CDUCAHOW ^oLn J^cClellan CommunUiiji \\\\ie7tjTy A Business/Communications Magnet TELEPHONE 570-4100  9417 GEYER SPRING ROAD  LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72209 September 22, 1995 SEP 2 7 1995 Dear Friends: Office of Desegregaiiofi Monitoring On Sunday, Auditorium October will be 1, 1995, dedicated the at Oma G. John L. Business/Communications Magnet High School. 'tfacovelli McClellan The program will start at 3 p.m. honoring Mrs. Oma G. Jacovelli who was a dedicated public servant. Mrs. Jacovelli worked untiringly for the Little Rock and Pulaski County Schools and was a special friend to education in all areas. Because of her commitment to our schools. it is very fitting that McClellan's Auditorium is being renamed in her honor. Please join the faculty and staff of McClellan, the Little Rock School Administration, the Little Rock School Board, and the Jacovelli family at this dedication ceremony and at the reception to follow. .incerelyV ^die Carter \"Principal og/^jygs 13:36 501 324 2023 LRSD COMMUNICATI  ODM 002/002 I 1 ! i y J I Little Rock School District ( 1 1 Media Advisory I i September 29, 1995 Dedication of Oma G. JacoveUi Auditorium For more information: Dina Teague, 324-2020 1 i i The auditorium at McClellan Business/Communications Magnet High School will become \"The Oma G. JacoveUi Auditorium\" during a dedication ceremony Sunday, October 1 at 3:00 p.m. at the school. ! Mrs. JacoveUi was a member of the LRSD Board of Directors from December of 1987 until her death last March. She was a founder of the Community School which is located at McClellan High School and was a strong advocate for all schools in southwest Little Rock. i Family members, LRSD administrators and board representatives, members of the school staff, and other community leaders will speak at the dedication ceremony. ### I ! i-.c \u0026lt; I LITTLE I \u0026gt;4 I I ' ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT John L. McClellan Community High School 9417 Geyer Springs Road Phone 570-4100 Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 October 15, 1995 Ms, Ann Brown Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 East Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 PCT 1 7 1995 Office of Desegrasaiioc. Dear Ms. Brown: Thank you very much for coming to McClellan on Sunday, October 1, to help dedicate the Oma 0. Jacovelli Auditorium. We know that you are a very busy person, and we appreciate your helping us make this an outstanding day for the family and friends of Oma. She would have loved the day I Your speech was fantastic I You were truly superb. The family. administration/faculty/staff, and friends of Mrs. Jacovelli were so excited about the remarks made on that day. You are such a caring person, and we thank you sincerely. It was very special. Also, thank you very much for the many things that you do for our school and for all the schools in Pulaski County, made a difference, and we appreciate you very much. You have really If we can ever do anything for you, please do not hesitate to let us know. We all care all John L. McClellan so much, and we will continue to work very hard to bring the best education possible to our students. Sincerely, Phy 14. its Smit id acul t yTS t a f f / and Administration A Business/Communications Magnet G .1 d .3B!?I Jsi/ G iiuonri^ Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 376-6200 Fax (501) 371 -0100 November 20, 1995 Mr. Jody Carter, Principal McClellan Community High School 9417 Geyer Springs Road Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 Dear Jody, The Office of Desegregation Monitoring is preparing a monitoring report on the secondary schools in the Little Rock School District which have magnet programs: Central High School, Dunbar Junior High School, Henderson Junior High School, and McClellan High School. 1 am writing this letter to ask your assistance in gathering data and in establishing a schedule for monitoring visits. The report will be written in eleven sections: (1) enrollment and recruitment, (2) staffing, (3) themes, (4)curriculum and instruction, (5) discipline, suspensions, expulsions, (6) guidance and counseling, (7) student achievement, (8) parent and community involvement, (9) facilities, (10) transportation, and (11) finance and budget. To the extent it is practicable, the report will focus on the magnet program and its effects. We will gather much of the data from district files but will need your assistance in collecting information available at school. I will visit with you in person before the monitoring visit to discuss procedures and to establish a monitoring date. Please have these items available to us during the monitoring visit: 1. A copy of the master schedule 2. Class enrollments for courses identified as magnet offerings 3. Program and course descriptions for magnet offerings as available 4. Curriculum guides for magnet curriculum as available 5. Textbooks and manuals used in magnet courses 6. Descriptions of enhancements of the magnet program as available 6. Brochures and other printed material related to student recruitment and parent involvement 7. A building floor plan.We will also need your help arranging interviews with appropriate staff in these areas: 1. Guidance and counseling 2. Magnet curriculum 3. Recruitment 4. Parent and community involvement 5. Desegregative effects of the magnet program. The district staff have offered to assist with data collection regarding enrollment, discipline, achievement, transportation, and budget. I will call you soon for an appointment that will allow us to clarify issues related to this report and to establish a schedule of monitoring visits. Gene Jones Associate Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arltansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 MEMORANDUM Date: November 28, 1995 From: Gene Jones To: Jody Carter Subject: ODM Monitoring Visit This memorandum is to confirm Thursday, December 7, 1995, as the date for the ODM monitoring visit to McClellan High School. The ODM staff will arrive at 9 a.m. and remain until the relevant data for the magnet program has been compiled. We will come to your office for a brief conference with you or those you designate. Please be prepared at that time to direct us to those staff members with access to information necessary for monitoring the items on the monitoring guide as we discussed during our recent visit. Thank you for the hospitality and candor you have shown us during this process.Office of Desegregation Monitoring Uniled States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 December 11, 1995 Mr. Jody Carter, Principal McClellan Community High School 9417 Geyer Springs Road Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 Dear Jody, Thank you for the hospitality extended to the ODM monitoring team last Thursday. The information packets you prepared for us made the visit workable and enabled us to gather the needed information quickly and handily. Steve Guerin was particularly helpful to me in gaining and understanding of why programs developed in their unique ways. The classroom visits gave us a one-day view of the magnet programs that will be useful in analyzing the desegregative effects of your efforts. The students were orderly and helpful to us as we moved around the campus. The result of the monitoring will be a report on the four LRSD secondary schools with magnet programs. We expect it to be issued in the spring of 1996. Your good work at McClellan is apparent, and I wish you continued success. Sincerely, Gene Jones, Associate Monitor12/11/95 10:52 QoOl 324 2023 LRSD COMMUNICATI ODM 002/004 -.1 Little Rock School District News Release McClellan Named Top Business School in the Nation December 11,1995 For more information: Dina Emfinger, 324-2020 LITTLE ROCK  McClellan Business/Communications Magnet High School was named the recipient of the 1995 National Programs of Excellence Business Education Award at the National Vocational Conference in Denver, Colorado on December 2. This award signifies that McClellan's business department is the top business education program in the nation. As the winner, the department received a 'plaque, a $1,000 award, and an all-expense paid trip to the conference for one member of the department. Entries for the award were judged in many areas including business faculty, facilities, curriculum, departmental philosophies and objectives, student organizations, honors, award, and recognitions. Recommendation letters from principal Jodie Carter, students, and personnel from the State Department of Education were included in McClellan's entry. The McClellan High School business program offers more business courses and has more instructors dedicated to its business department than any other school in the state. In addition to the high school offerings, McClellan provides an excellent program of adult classes. (more)12/11/95 10:53 501 324 2023 LRSD COMMUNICATI @003/004 ODM ' McClellan Named Top Business School in the Nation December 11,1995 Page two of three The business program also supports the largest Future Business Leaders of America (FBLA) chapter in the state and one of the largest Distributive Education Clubs of America (DECA) chapters. McClellan business students have won hundreds of awards from both organizations and are elected to their respective state and district offices each year. \"I think that the selection committee was impressed that it did not take a brand new school with endless resources to create a such a successful program,\" said Phyllis Smith, business department chair. \"The determination and teamwork of our staff members are what make our business program an outstanding one.\" Students see that teachers will give extra time needed to make each project successful. The business faculty makes every effort to do their part to carry out the activities necessary to help students flourish and learn. Ms. Smith and Tony Hunicutt attended the conference in Denver. Other members of the business department are Angela McCallie, Shirley Hodges, Audrey Sinith, feri Bob King, Nancy Leslie, Pat Leach, and Brenda Stuckey. ' Ms. Smith is currently the President of the National Association of Classroom Educators in Business Education. She is also the local advisor and District VUI (FBLA) Coordinator in Arkansas. In 1992, Mrs. Smith was named the FBLA Advisor of the Year, and she was honored on the state and national level.  She has been named the Arkansas Business Teacher of the Year twice and was named the National Economics Business Teacher of the Year in 1986 and National Business Teacher of the Year in 1988. McClellan Business/Communications Magnet Program High School enrollment is open to students living in its attendance zone and to other students who wish to apply for the magnet program. In addition to the magnet program, McClellan offers a full standard curriculum, advanced placement courses, a gifted and talented program, and honors classes. McClellan also hosts a Community (more)12/11/95 10:54 Q501 324 2023 LRSD COMMUNICATI ODM 004/004 McClellan Named Top Business School in the Nation December 11,1995 Page three of three School which offers tutoring programs, ACT prep courses for McClellan students, night classes for all ages, and summer programs for children and teenagers. Pre-registration for the 1996-1997 school year will be February 5-16,1996. For more information on enrollment, call McClellan at 570-4100, or the LRSD Student -Assignment Office at 324-2272. NOTE: Dr. Henry Williams will recognize Jodie Carter and Phyllis Smith of McClellan High School and will congratulate diem on receiving this award by presenting a Superintendent Citation to the school at the regular board meeting December 21. on ###1.2/11/95 10:52 501 324 2023 LRSD COMMUNICATI ODM @002/004 . r I 5 3 Little Rock School District News Release McClellan Named Top Business School in the Nation December 11,1995 For more information: Dina Emfinger, 324-2020 LITTLE ROCK  McClellan Business/Communications Magnet High School was named the recipient of the 1995 National Programs of Excellence Business Education Award at the National Vocational Conference in Denver, Colorado on December 2. This award signifies that McClellan's business department is the top business education program in the nation. As the winner, the department received a plaque, a $1,000 award, and an all-expense paid trip to the conference for one member of the department. Entries for the award were judged in many areas including business faculty, facilities, curriculum, departmental philosophies and objectives, student organizations, honors, award, and recognitions. Recommendation letters from principal Jodie Carter, students, and personnel from the State Department of Education were included in McClellan's entry. The McQellan High School business program offers more business courses and has more instructors dedicated to its business department than any other school in the state. In addition to the high school offerings, McClellan provides an excellent program of adult classes. (more) I12/11/9J5 10:53 501 324 2023 LRSD COMMUNICATI ODM 0003/004 I ! McClellan Named Top Business School in the Nation December 11,1995 Page two of three The business program also supports the largest Future Business Leaders of America (FBLA) chapter in the state and one of the largest Distributive Education Clubs of America (DECA) chapters. McClellan business students have won hundreds of awards from both organizations and are elected to their respective state and district offices each year. \"I think that the selection committee was impressed that it did not take a brand new school with endless resources to create a such a successful program,\" said Phyllis Smith, business department chair. \"The determination and teamwork of our staff members are what make our business program an outstanding one.\" Students see that teachers will give extra time needed to make each project successful. The business faculty makes every effort to do their part to carry out the activities necessary to help students flourish and learn. Ms. Smith and Tony Hunicutt attended the conference in Denver. Other members of the business department are Angela McCallie, Shirley Hodges, Audrey Smith, Jeri Bob King, Nancy Leslie, Pat Leach, and Brenda Stuckey. Ms. Smith is currently the President of the National Association of Glassroom Educators in Business Education. She is also the local advisor and District Vin (FBLA) Coordinator in Arkansas. In 1992, Mrs. Smith was named the FBLA Advisor of the Year, and she was honored on the state and national level. ' She has been named the Arkansas Business Teacher of the Year twice and was named the National Economics Business Teacher of the Year in 1986 and National Business Teacher of the Year in 1988. McClellan Business/ Communications Magnet Program High School enrollment is open to students living in its attendance zone and to other students who wish to apply for the magnet program. In addition to the magnet program, McClellan offers a full standard curriculum, advanced placement courses, a gifted and talented program, and honors classes. McClellan also hosts a Community I (more)12/11/95 10:54 501 324 2023 LRSD COMMUNICATI ODM @004/004 McClellan Named Top Business School in the Nation December 11,1995 Page three of three School which offers tutoring programs, ACT prep courses for McClellan students, night classes for all ages, and summer programs for children and teenagers. Pre-registration for the 1996-1997 school year will be February 5-16,1996. For more information on enrollment, call -McClellan at 570-4100, or the LRSD Student Assignment Office at 324-2272. NOTE: Dr. Henry Williams will recognize Jodie Carter and Phyllis Smith of McClellan High School and will congratulate them on receiving this award by presenting a Superintendent Citation to the school at the regular board meeting December 21. on j i ### I IO'- w ep AGENDA McClellan Community School Advisory Council Meeting Monday, March 25,1996 6:00 p.m. McClellan Media\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1199","title":"Magnet Review Committee: Budget","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1995/1996"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Finance","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","Magnet schools"],"dcterms_title":["Magnet Review Committee: Budget"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1199"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\n ' rjalfa.l!lllili It-Ii i!!i\nl/i:illlli1i1ii':: ==: 11:1111:1: 1 I ii : \u0026gt;Jlli.il~ ii I \": I11::~\n!ft, CERTIFIED 01 Principal 6.0 $357,193 6.0 $375,279 6.0 $340,086 6.0 $346,907 STAFF 02 Asst. Prin. 10.0 $438,462 10.0 $433,972 10.0 $473,907 10.0 $477,647 03 Specialists 37.2 $1,078,799 39.2 $1,211,895 39.2 $1,224,208 39.2 $1,266,529 04 Counselors 10.4 $356,314 12.4 $405,435 12.4 $452,360 12.4 $456,579 05 Media Spec. 6.5 $222,455 6.5 $224,104 6.5 $230,137 6.5 $233,047 06 Art-Perf./Prod. 0.0 $0 0.0 $0 0.0 $0 0.0 $0 07 Music 0.0 $0 0.0 $0 0.0 $0 o.o $0 08 Foreign Lang. 0.0 $0 0.0 $0 0.0 $0 0.0 $0 09 Vocational 12.6 $489,335 12.6 $483,977 12.6 $404,921 12.6 $409,206 10 Special Education 7.8 $245,166 7.7 $282,681 7.7 $263,527 8.2 $283,351 11 Gifted 5.0 $159,822 5.4 $158,016 5.4 $189,153 5.4 $1 90,921 12 Classroom 177.6 $5,354,901 175.9 $5,377,867 175.9 $5,582,275 175.9 55,642,152 13 Substitutes 0.0 $147,417 0.0 $182,975 0.0 $154,925 0.0 $154,990 14 Other-Kindergarten 14.0 $426,571 14.0 $448,552 14.0 $459,595 14.0 $463,885 TOTAL CERTIFIED SALARY 287.1 $9,276,435 289.7 $9,584,753 289.7 $9,775,094 290.2 $9,925,214 SUPPORT 15 Secretaries 19.0 $355,081 19.0 $360,333 19.0 $323,508 20.0 $337,934 STAFF 16 Nurses 5.4 $148,996 5.4 $156,152 5.4 $155,272 5.4 $160,236 17 Custodians 28.5 $335,694 28.5 $360,957 28.5 $355,219 29.0 $372,933 18 Paraprofessionals-Chptr 1 0.0 $0 0.0 $0 0.0 $0 0.0 $0 19 Paraprofessionals-Other 6.0 $143,913 6.0 $122,210 6.0 $132,853 6.0 $142,764 20 Other-Aides 39.5 $256,806 37.0 $237,662 37.0 $270,749 37.0 $278,875 21 FringeBenefits(20) ~  $1,366,607 ~ $1,213,301 ~  $1,282,054 ~ $1,297,521 TOTAL SUPPORT SALARY 98.4 $2,607,097 95.9 $2,450,615 95.9 $2,519,655 97.4 $2,590,263 TOTAL(10-20) ~ $11,883,532 - $12,035,368 ~  $12,294,749 ~ $12,515,477 PURCHASED 22 Utilities ~ $507,373 ~ $598,876 ~ $619,066 #.i6.P\u0026lt;lC $626,335 SERVICES 23 Travel ffi. $33,980 ~ $20,580 ~ $33,907 ~ $38,500 (30) 24 Maintenance Agreements ~ ~ ,~xli\": ~ 25 Other ~: $92,772 ~ : $119,669 ):).c~ $74,250 ~ . $69,500 TOTAL (30) 1##..:. $634,125 ~:.: $739,125 ~Ki:if $727,223 ~: $734,335 MATERIALS, ~2::..:6+..P'-'-rin-'c-'ip:....a....',ls.:......:..O_ffi-'--ce,\n__ _- -it,\n,~,,.'.':'\"..\",.:: '.* ---::-::-::-::--:-::-::,-max:~.~:!o'o:i - --=-=-=-=--=-=:-fl\"-lb~)~:l~: --=-=-=-=-=:-fl\"--:!~\u0026lt;~'-'-'~:!\u0026gt;:.- -=-::-:-::-\"77\":~ SUPPLIES 27 RegularClassroom ~: $309,128 ~ $328,856 ~l(@: $302,337 ~ $313,418 (40) 28 Media ~: $53,842 ~ $34,277 ffl#i $57,242 ~ $57,100 CAPITAL OUTLAY (50) 29 Other ~ $11,647 ~ $18,873 ~ $19,510 ~ $16,800 TOTAL(40) ~ $374,617 ~ $382,006 ~ $379,089 ~ $387,318 30 Equipment ~ $106,283 ~ $67,029 itXiooicX $93,646 ~ $86,598 31 Building Repair, etc. ~ - ~ ~ ~ TOTAL (50) ~- $106,283 ~- $67,029 ~ $93,646 ~: $86,598 OTHER 33 Dues and Fees ~ $12 416 ri.ii iiiitii $13,017 ~ $15,655 ~ (60) 34 Other b:laooc s12, 0 416 ..xji(.!.K..:o.~.~.\n...a. c. ~ ~ TOTAL (60) ~ $13,017 ~ $15,655 ~ $14,500 $14,500 TOTAL(30-60) ~ $1,127,441 4 $1,201,177 ~ $1,215,613 ~ $1,222,751 TOTAL (10-60) 385.5 $13,010,969 385.6 $13,236,545 385.6 $13,510,362 387.6 $13,738,228 TOTAL LINE ITEl~S- (SECOND PAGE) ixlixxx. $537,465 ~ $413,629 ~ $796,728 ~  $876,136 'f'#YG.~Nt:f./\nJ.:OT:\nMMfW%, ~ -\\-~'l'.~~W~ : . : ilJ3'$.$.0~1t~1 ~ tl.t4~i~:\n~ ~41J:$~J~O 11~~!m::rr:~11:1::11:!i:~i:t1:::::: ~::~:~~x\n::m \n::~~~:\nt\n::~~\n:~~~~~ Stipends $19,871 $16,269 $29,125 $29,125 Other Objects Indirect Costs $458,905 $348,726 $685,103 $764,511 Vocation al $29,864 $17,222 $32,000 $32,000 Athletics $27,741 $28,627 $29,000 $29,000 Gifted Programs $51 $500 $500 Plant Services $1,009 $15,000 $15,000 Reading $500 $500 Science English ($2,058) $1,500 $1,500 Special Education $2,082 $2,785 $4,000 $4,000 XXlOOO( XXlOOO( XXlOOO( Total Line Items $537,465 $413,629 $796,728 $876,136 (r\u0026amp;Pul:\u0026gt;llCosC t !i!~~Wfft tfflHff.lifM i~S~tH? l~f~HlF 3rd Qtr. ADM or Proj. 3679.6 3570.5 3530.0 3530.0 Total Costs $13,548,434 $13,650,174 $14,307,090 $14,614,360 e,te.up11c9\u0026amp;ttr:uwm1t\nrnni:\n:m$$.\nm\nwrnm:\n1::$$.l32a:!: wmrnJMi~:!i mrn:nt,in~.:. CERTIFIED 01 Principal 1.0 $52,699 1.0 $54,600 1.0 $55,764 1.0 $56,095 STAFF 02 Asst. Prin. 1.0 $51,060 1.0 $52,028 1.0 $52,028 1.0 $52,334 03 Specialists 7.0 $239,870 7.0 $253,810 7.0 $247,392 7.0 $245,325 04 Counselors 1.4 $35,997 2.0 $79,221 2.0 $66,806 2.0 $67,430 05 Media Spec. 1.0 $35,134 1.0 $37,012 1.0 $37,836 1.0 $38,190 06 Art-Perf./Prod. 07 Music 08 Foreign Lang. 09 Classroom 30.2 $926,604 30.2 $907,324 30.2 $937,495 30.2 $985,475 10 Special Education 1.3 $49,377 1.3 $51,124 1.3 $51 ,389 1.3 $51,869 11 Gifted 1.0 $34,242 1.0 $36,073 1.0 $36,876 1.0 $37,222 12 Chapter 1 13 Substitutes $17,757 $24,191 $20,000 $20,000 14 Other-Kindergarten 4.0 $110,916 4.0 $120,022 4.0 $125,362 4.0 $126,532 TOTAL CERTIFIED SALARY 47.9 $1,553,656 48.5 $1,615,405 48.5 $1,630,948 48.5 $1,680,472 SUPPORT 15 Secretaries 2.0 $30,341 2.0 $46,344 2.0 $31,932 2.0 $31 ,932 STAFF 16 Nurses 1.0 $25,725 1.0 $27,301 1.0 $28,104 1.0 $28,104 17 Custodians 4.0 $42,176 4.0 $44,290 4.0 $51,384 4.0 $51,384 18 Paraprofesslonals-Chptr 1 19 Paraprofessionals-Other 20 Other-Aides 8.0 $64,657 7.0 $37,000 7.0. $63,323 7.0 $63,624 21 Fringe Beneflts(20) I~ $225,867 ~ $198,345 ~ $209,385 ~ $21 4,360 TOTAL SUPPORT SALARY 15.0 $388,766 14.0 $353,280 14.0 $384,128 14.0 $389,405 TOTAL(10-20) ~ $1,942,422 ~ $1,968,685 ~ $2,015,076 ~ $2,069,877 TOTAL(30) ~ $81,041 ~ - $94,163 ~: $98,615 ~ - r:M-:-SUA-:-:T:::PE==PR:-:-LIAl:-:EL--:SS:-,~ 2\ns~:P....,.r'---in=c~ip=a:1cs\n-=o,\n._-cc1_1i=ce~=~==-i!~'=iii.m=#/~e\n..r:n~.*/.is: it===~s- 3\n-\n7\n,- 77 =:. -\n-\n4~~:1.~#!~II $44 36 ~: $ 34 900 ~ : 27 Regular lassroom      , .... ...... .. ,4 ~ -- , ~: (40) .,_2_8_M~ed~ia_______ $4,743 ~: $5,380 ~: $4,800 ~ 29 Other #.d.i\u0026lt;l( $1,255 m. $2,624 ~ $1,255 ~ $99,750 $35,155 $4,800 CAPITAL OUTLAY (50) OTHER (60) $1,000 TOTAL(40) ~ $43,772 ~ $52,440 ~ $40,955 ~ $40,955 30 Equipment ~ $10,090 ~ $12,832 ~ $6,000 ~ $6,000 31 Building Repair, etc. 32 Other TOTAL(S0) ~ $10,090 ~: $12,832 !L~.. $6,000 ~ $6,000 33 Dues and Fees 34 Other TOTAL (60) ~ $0 i $0 ~ $0 ~ $0 TOTAL (30-60) ~ $134,903 ~ $159,435 ~ $145,570 ~ $146,705 TOTAL(10-60) -62.9 $2,077,325 62.5 $2,128,120 62.5 $2,160,646 62.5 $2,216,582 TOTAL LINE ITEMS-(SECOND PAGE) ~ 75446.0 ~ $59,394 ~ $113,512 ~ $126,220 fitt tt~~~PrrP-tltWlMMH ~ m\nlZ~~/rnN . :t11tmm,,1.\\ ~ f:) j2'~Jfa$j: ~ ,:):):$.?~a4~)~M Stipends $1,500 Other Objects Indirect Costs $75,260 $57,435 $109,849 $122,557 Vocational Athletics Gifted Programs $16 $155 $155 Plant Services $166 $2,505 $2,505 Reading $84 $84 Science English ($337) $251 $251 Special Education $341 $459 $668 $668 xxxxxx XX)()()()( xxxxxx Total Line Items $75,446 $59,394 $113,512 $126,220 ,~eum.1.,#wrr\nrn\n,1\nnn 1.m~mm:rm: :im\n:~nmmm\ntqf$.$1timn 1.~~=\n.J 3rd Qtr. ADM or Pro]. 604.4 588.0 566.0 566.0 Total Costs $2,152,TT1 $2,187,514 $2,274,158 $2,342,801 PetPU\u0026amp;lCo.itfN%l@Mt@ MWM$3'~ !:Mt:'.@iliJ$3'~  :tttffM'O.tS.I ttJM~l39.: R\u0026amp;~~~~~:s~~,~::::::::t::::~:: =t::: :\n:~\n::,:~~:1\n::: ~ :: '::\n:::::::\n~:::':\n: :.~::\n:::::::::~:::::\n:=:: ti~\n::\n~a CERTIFIED 01 Principal 1.0 $57,676 1.0 $67,263 1.0 $49,235 1.0 $52,141 STAFF 02 Asst. Prin. 1.0 $32,092 1.0 $41,640 1.0 $39,569 1.0 $40,782 03 Specialists 7.0 $212,014 8.0 $245,103 8.0 $259,133 8.0 $263,095 04 Coun:.elors 1.6 $50,547 2.0 $45,473 2.0 $62,791 2.0 $63,378 05 Media Spec. 1.5 $43,532 1.5 $47,207 1.5 $48,443 1.5 S48,896 06 Art-Perf./Prod. 07 Music 08 Foreign Lang. 09 Classroom 23.0 $572,789 24.3 $581,394 24.3 $690,567 24.3 $698,233 1 O Special Education 1.0 $30,734 1.0 $33,001 1.0 $26,869 1.5 $44,484 11 Gifted 1.0 $32,46!\n1.4 $47,830 1.4 $45,303 1.4 $45,726 12 Chapter 1 13 Substitutes $16,814 $12,271 $17,150 $17,150 14 Other-Kindergarten 4.0 $116,101 4.0 $117,112 4.0 $120,344 4.0 $121,467 TOTAL CERTIFIED SALARY 41.1 $1,164,768 44.2 $1,238,294 44.2 $1,359,404 44.7 $1,395,351 SUPPORT 15 Secretaries 3.0 $65,657 3.0 $60,742 3.0 $50,964 3.0 $49,502 STAFF 16 Nurses 1.0 $29,857 1.0 $31,556 1.0 $32,359 1.0 $32,359 17 Custodians 4.0 $34,361 4.0 $43,531 4.0 $41 ,956 4.0 $44,188 18 Paraprofessionals-Chptr 1 19 Paraprofessionals-Other 20 Other-Aides 11.0 $71,921 11.0 $75,921 11.-0 $78,184 11 .0 $88,772 21 Fringe Beneflts(20) ~ $190,533 ~ $171,444 ~ $191,607 . $198,572 TOTAL SUPPORT SALARY 19.0 $392,329 19.0 $383,194 19.0 $395,070 19.0 $413,392 TOTAL(10-20) ~ $1,557,097 ~ : $1,621,488 - $1,754,474 , ~ $1,808,743 PSUERRCVHIACSEESD 22 23 TUrtailvit 8 ie 1 s ~ $53,586 ~.P\u0026lt;if $6$6 8 , 0 9 4 7 64 31---$-'-75....:,_965-i,\n,~:mx\"\"x:,:,,:\n:\n.m.\n--$-'-7-'7,_41-3-! ~ $12,253 ~  $9,000 \"ffl./ $9,000 (30) 24 Maintenance Agreements ~ ~  :'.~ 25 Other ~ $9,911 ~ $13,840  $10,700 ~ $10,700 L...----...L.::c:.+:..:,__:___T_O _T _A_L_(3_0_) _- +lniai~o,i .~i.o..i.:i.' li\u0026gt; l : f------:$--75--',---75\"\"\"0..i\u0026lt;..i #~l..(.\" .m\no~\n.:::\n+-:- -$8-c--::-:-9-'--=,2~n::-+j~!:!jf~: $95,665 .:..=:.:.\".~...,..\n\n..\n+-:: _$ :..:9:..:.7~,1:..:.13=--! MATERIALS, 1-=2:.::6+P:,.\nr.:.\n.ln.:.=c:!:.lp-=-al:.,,:'s:....O::\nl.:.\n.flc:..:e:___ __~ ~\n:1X.l4!iilii.lt,\nJ~i--:-=--::-:::c-=-ittim:li0\n~,.\n\"Xj\n:r--:----:-:-::-=-itili\"..l !1 ii!il~J\u0026amp;m:'.:'.i--:-=--=-::-=-it~~i--::-=--=-::-:-1 SUPPLIES 27 Regular Classroom ~ $52,759 ~  $54,466 ~~.~ $63,330 ~: $63,330 (40) 28 Media ix'imi. $13,271 ~: $5,356 ~:*-l!: $11,500 ~: $11,500 CAPITAL OUTLAY (50) 29 Other TOTAL(40) 30 Equipment 31 Building Repair, etc. 32 Other TOTAL(50) imb. $2,593 ~ $3,498 ~  $3,500 ~ $3,500 ~ $68,623 ~ $63,320 ~ . $78,330 ~ $78,330 ~ - $27,894 ~: $19,490 ~: $19,000 ~ $19,000 ~ $27,894 ~ $19,490 ~ $19,000 ~ $19,000 OTHER 33 Dues and Fees  $3,908 ~ $5,643 ~ $3,000 ~ (60) i-:34:.:.+0.::..t.::..h:...:.er--'-'-----'-----f.o'-. ixiood ~ ~ : L-~-::::L.-----1..:::.:_+.::.::.:.:::\n....----=T:-:O::-::T:-:A-,-L-:-(6:-:0\"\"\")-----ffl~ $3,908 ~ - $5,643 ~~ $3,000 ~l $3,000 $3,000 TOTAL(30-60) ~ $176,174 ~ $177,730 ~ $195,995 ~ $197,443 TOTAL(10-60) 60.1 $1,733,271 63.2 $1,799,218 63.2 $1,950,469 63.7 $2, 006,186 TOTAL LINE ITEM$-(SECOND PAGE) ~ $86,058 ~ $64,923 ~ $129,543 j(~ $128,244\n:::\n::::,\n:'::,~o,ror#c:,:\n:x,:::: ~\n:\n:,::ttJU$~: ~ :rtt~a~at ~ :::it~mm~~m~: ~ -t s2.m3M~ ,,.,.,,  tlthr  ti~, .......... ttS.mttiat?t ta.wrifbtt 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 Stipends $12,453 $6,044 $13,100 $13,100 Other Objects Indirect Costs $73,425 $58,412 $112,956 $111,657 Vocational Athletics Gifted Programs $15 $145 $145 Plant Services $162 $2,385 $2,385 Reading $82 $82 Science English ($329) $239 $239 Special Education $333 $467 $636 $636 xxxxxx )00()()()( )00()()()( Total Line Items $86,058 $64,923 $129,543 $128,244 $.iriffilm.l\nQ.QJOMMW)UHJ i~lit:W Jm.fSMJtt tB~tmn 1~~t 3rd atr. ADM or ProJ. 588.3 597.9 582.0 582.0 Total Costs $1,819,329 $1,864,141 $2,080,012 $2,134,430 HWlPU~l'.CoitMWHrnxww tlMK13i~ i ttM{IJ.'1.i\u0026amp;.i UttffJ.3tnG MttM'.$3.)~J CERTIFIED 01 Principal 1.0 $56,515 1.0 $59,233 1.0 $44,496 1.0 $46,919 STAFF 02 Asst. Prln. 1.0 $55,922 1.0 1.0 $43,068 1.0 $43,328 03 Specialists 5.8 $160,752 5.8 $127,098 5.8 $154,817 5.8 $164,21 9 04 Counselors 1.0 $39,485 1.0 $40,670 1.0 $40,670 1.0 $41,050 05 Media Spec. 1.0 $36,471 1.0 $38,684 1.0 $39,257 1.0 $39,624 06 Art-Perl./Prod. 07 Music 08 Foreign Lang. 09 Classroom 17.0 $482,159 15.0 $462,587 15.0 $433,026 15.0 $435,154 10 Special Education 1.5 $53,235 1.5 $70,319 1.5 $52,851 1.5 $53,344 11 Gifted 1.0 $35,493 1.0 $33,443 1.0 $34,246 1.0 $34,566 12 Chapter 1 13 Substitutes $13,666 $11,733 $14,000 $14,000 14 Other-Kindergarten 2.0 $52,144 2.0 $57,912 2.0 $59,580 2.0 $60,136 TOTAL CERTIFIED SALARY 31 .3 $985,841 29.3 $901,679 29.3 $916,011 29.3 $932,340 SUPPORT 15 Secretaries 2.0 $27,701 1.4 $15,692 1.4 $18,779 1.4 $1--8,779 STAFF 16 Nurses 0.8 $11,304 0.8 $11,856 0.0 $12,446 0.8 $12,446 17 Custodians 3.0 $33,776 3.0 $39,012 3.0 $39,803 3.0 $39,003 18 Paraprofessionals-Chptr 1 19 Paraprofessionals-Other 20 Other-Aides 6.0 $26,782 5.6 $33,307 5.6 - $32,907 5.6 $33,445 21 Fringe Beneflts(20) ~ $141,032 ~ $114,688 ~ $123,740 ~ $124,892 TOTALSUPPORTSALARY 11.8 $240,594 10.8 $214,555 10.8 $227,675 10.8 $229,365 TOTAL(10-20) 'fflhli $1,226,435 ~ $1,116,234 ~ - $1,143,686 ~ $1,161,705 $4,000 TOTAL(30) ~ $36,254 ~- $42,173 ~ $48,792 ~ $49,763 MATERIALS, 26 Prlnclpal's Office I-__:~~~~\n::':\n.\n:: t.:iii !---=-=~~4!~i:!li:~t.l-~l\ng,\n.\ni+-_.:.\n~~~'.llif\u0026gt;iii:l::t~.:l::::t t-_ _.:.\n~:-=-:--1 SUPPLIES 27 Regular Classroom $23,541 ~ $20,882 ~: $25,068 ~ - $25,000 (40) 28 Media $6,489 ~ $3,934 ~ $6,600 -~ $8,000 29 Other if~:~: $1,016 ~ $1,397 -'.'.:':',!\n.\n, j_ '\"7:$:.::2.:..,:,4755~~~J\n1,,,l9\u0026gt;ff~:~:l---:=::c-::-:-::-l .--,,-----=---,-,---+:,---,,---T:...::O:....:T..:..A=L...l.(4.:..:0:t..)- --E~\n:\n:~:~\ni,:)1.' !!--....\n$\n_.\n3'-::1\"-:,04c=-6~~il'.4\ni'.i.li:$.ltii:+ -~$2~6~,2~1-=3'-\" ':.it...i.~ .-:1.i.'.i:r -___:.$~$34 2 ::-.!.',S4:::'12:'=--3 6 ........ ....::~.:::::::*:_: :_ ___:.$~33\n:-',,0::-:0::-:::0~ CAPITAL 30 Equipment @.IQC) $2,594 ~ $1,312 ~ $3,700 OLITLAY 31 Building Repair, etc. ~ ~ -- (50) 32 Other ~ ~ ~ ~ OTHER (60) TOTAL (50) ~ $2,594 ~ $1,312 ~ $2,646 ~ $3,700 33 Dues and Fees ~ $1,132 ~ $215 ~ $1,155 ~ $1,000 34 Other ~ ~ ~ ~ TOTAL(60) ~ - $1,132 ~ $215 ~ $1,155 ~ $1,000 TOTAL(30-60) ~ - $71,025 ~ $69,913 ~ $86,716 ~ $87,463 TOTAL(10-60) 43.1 $1,297,460 40.1 $1,186,147 40.1 $1,230,402 40.1 $1,249, 168 TOTAL LINE 1TB $-(SECOND PAGE) ~ $41,553 ~ $29,105 ~ $57,993 ~ $70,963  : \u0026lt;\u0026lt;'14~1M-Mt\u0026lt;ttt ~ '\n.J,:~\n~\n~: : : ::::\u0026lt; :\\l1~1$~ii #P~ tj:~\n~$$? ~ ::tl t~ ~13.1:ffi Other Objects Indirect Costs $41,301 $28,874 $56,089 $69,059 Vocational Athletics Gifted Programs $8 $80 $80 Plant Services $91 $1,305 $1,305 Reading $42 $42 Science English ($185) $129 $129 Special Education $187 $231 $348 $348 xxxxxx lOClOOO( lOClOOO( t{et P:OpllC.offMPP@@mrn ,~~rnm 1fflf.tft@Wii j\n~f~Wtt ,~~Ht% 3rd Qtr. ADM or Pro]. 329.0 295.7 289.0 289.0 Total Costs $1,339,013 $1,215,252 $1,288,395 $1,320,131 Jffit:E'-u.P.!lCoSf:rmtt:wwrn\niM@l$.,f'.Q.~l: t%i%$4?$.10:i iWWilif~:: tHltt$.J.iS.Gai CERTIFIED 01 Principal 1.0 $64,174 1.0 $65,081 1.0 $60,588 1.0 $60,956 STAFF 02 Asst. Prln. 1.0 $36,843 1.0 $38,931 1.0 $40,047 1.0 $40,205 03 Specialists 04 Counselors 4.0 $141,471 5.0 $173,230 5.0 $182,894 5.0 $184,602 1.4 $40,611 1.4 $45,279 1.4 $41,011 1.4 $41,394 05 Media Spec. 1.0 $34,592 1.0 $25,446 1.0 $28,846 1.0 $29,874 06 Art-Perf./Prod. 07 Music 08 Foreign Lang. 09 Classroom 21.0 $631,616 20.0 $630,446 20.0 $660,714 20.0 10 Special Education 1.5 $13,370 1.1 $25,764 1.1 $28,877 1.1 11 Gifted 2.0 $57,618 2.0 $40,670 2.0 $72,728 2.0 12 Chapter 1 13 Substitutes $15,588 $17,314 $16,000 14 Other-Kindergarten 3.0 $107,925 3.0 $112,836 3.0 $113,639 3.0 TOTAL CERTIFIED SALAR 35.9 $1,143,808 35.5 $1,174,997 35.5 $1,245,344 35.5 SUPPORT 15 Secretaries 2.0 $42,678 2.6 $27,786 2.6 $41,377 2.6 STAFF 16 Nurses 1.0 $31,904 1.0 $33,664 1.0 $35,551 1.0 17 Custodians 3.5 $43,163 3.5 $44,866 3.5 $46,660 4.0 18 Paraprofessionals-Chptr 1 19 Paraprofessionals-Other 20 Other-Aides 9.0 $32,748 9.0 $37,175 9.0 $44,618 9.0 21 Fringe Benefits(20) ~ $171,101 ~ - $147,956 ~ $166,961 ~ - TOTALSUPPORTSALARY 15.5 $321,594 16.1 $291,447 16.1 $335,167 16.6 TOTAL(10-20) ildo\u0026amp;iii- $1,465,402 ~ $1,466,444 ~ $1,580,511 ~ PURCHASE 22 Utilities ~ $38,623 ~ $44,468 ~ $57,280 ~ SERVICES 23 Travel ~ $3,793 ~ $4,601 ~ $5,000 ~ (30) 24 Maintenance Agreements ~ ~ ~ ~ 25 Other ~ - $16,400 ~ - $9,938 ~ $8,000 ~ TOTAL (30) ~ - $58,816 ~ - $59,007 ~- $70,280 ~ MATERIALS, 26 Prlncipal's Office ~ ~ ~ ~- SUPPLIES 27 Regular Classroom ~ $38,631 ~: $55,228 ~ $31,698 ~ (40) 28 Media ~ $6,234 ~ $4 645 ~ $11,000 ~ 29 Other ~ $1,475 ~ $2095 ~ $2,200 ~ CAPITAL OUTL-\\Y (50) TOTAL(40) ~ $46,341 ~ $61:968 Pffi $44,898 ~ 30 Equipment ~ $25,034 ~ $6,799 ~ $22,700 ~ 31 Building Repair, etc. iiooooci ~ ~- ~ 32 Other ~ imn: ~ ~ TOTAL (50) ~ $25,034 ~ $6,799 ~ $22,700 ~ OTHER 33 Dues and Fees ~ $190 ~ $720 ~ $2,000 ~ (60) 34 Other ~ ~ ~ ~ $691,929 $29,146 $73,407 $16,000 $114,700 $1 ,282,212 $39,684 $35,551 $51,012 $41,317 $170,901 $338,466 $1,620,677 $59,353 $5,000 $8,000 $72,353 $39,700 $10,000 $2,300 $52,000 $15,598 $15,598 $2,000 TOTAL (60) ~ $190 ~ $720 ~ $2,000 ~ $2,000 TOTAL(30-60) ~ $130,381 ~ $128,494 ~ $139,878 ~ $141,951 TOTAL(10-60) 51.4 $1,595,783 51.6 $1,594,938 51.6 $1,720,389 52.1 $1,762,628 TOTAL LINE ITEI $-(SECOND PAGE) ~ $60,881 ~ $49,480 ~ - $103,657 ~ $110,833 !:J'\\GIViNO:r.qr.Mi/WWl@ ~ :nM~~E\\ ::  MJ:1~il.1~f ~ %4:t~\n()Mi ~ @!J.t\nst:l\n~u Mn!J~,~]%1.@/iil!Itfrn::: t~uattt :Ctt~t  ttfmfgattlt tt8ud0it :,:::::::,,:::::::::::::::::::::: ...... 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 Stipends $1,537 $1,676 $10,000 $10,000 Other Objects Indirect Costs $59,199 $47,427 $90,829 $98,005 Vocational Athletics Gifted Programs $12 $120 $120 Plant Services $130 $1,935 $1,935 Reading $63 $63 Science English ($265) $194 ~194 Special Education $269 $377 $516 $516 xxxxxx xxxxxx )()(JOO()( Total Line Items $60,881 $49,480 $103,657 $110,833 e~PQWl:t.0$\nt#illrnrnww 1.~'S~WMi 1'-~%Ni 1.B4-$.$iii'\u0026amp;i' l~@tkii1 3rd Qtr. ADM or Proj. 473.3 485.8 468.0 468.0 Total Costs $1,656,664 $1,644,418 $1,824,046 $1,873,461 ~ -P-Oi:\u0026gt;lf-WlMM@f.mt iUNMl3$.00 mHMllJ~  tJ%$'3=D.1 )it:WN$4~003 CERTIFIED 01 Principal 1.0 $63,612 1.0 $64,520 1.0 $64,256 1.0 $64,647 STAFF 02 Asst. Prin. 3.0 $143,289 3.0 $148,979 3.0 $145,767 3.0 $146,644 03 Specialists 3.6 $102,810 3.6 $111,283 3.6 $113,157 3.6 $107,924 04 Counselors 2.0 $71,228 3.0 $69,852 3.0 $111,241 3.0 $112,280 05 MediaSpec. 1.0 $39,713 1.0 $41,729 1.0 $41,729 1.0 $42,11 9 06 Art-Perl./Prod. - 07 Music r:08:-::-tF=-o-re-:-i-gn-L=-a-n_g _ ------t----t------ir----+-----+----i----+---+---- 09 Vocational 5.6 $186,730 5.6 $207,954 5.6 $190,845 5.6 $192,581 10 Special Education 1.3 $46,551 1.3 $49,016 1.3 $50,084 1.3 $50,552 11 Gifted 12 Classroom 46.8 $1,370,771 46.8 $1,424,850 46.8 $1,443,934 46.8 $1,458,375 13 Substitutes $34,413 $71,832 $36,135 $36,200 14 Other TOTAL CERTIFIED SALARY 64.3 $2,059,117 65.3 $2,190,015 65.3 $2,197,148 65.3 $2,211,323 SUPPORT 15 Secretaries 4.0 $65,214 4.0 $66,063 4.0 $68,494 5.0 $85,094 $32,360 $70,181 STAFF 16 Nurses 1.0 $31,416 1.0 $32,359 1.0 $32,359 1.0 17 Custodians 6.0 $68,427 6.0 $68,890 6.0 $60,373 6.0 18 Paraprofessionals-Chptr 1 19 Paraprofessionals-Other 1.0 $21,650 1.0 $24,845 1.0 $23,937 1.0 $33,356 1-2-0+0t-h-'er---A-id_es ______3_ _ 5_ +--$4-6-',6-9-3-+--2.-4-+--$4-2,'-95-1-+--2.4- -+--$-2-8'-1, -0-1+--2-.4-+---$28,101 21 Fringe Beneflts(20) ~ $292,062 #.l\u0026lt; $266,922 ~ $275,254 ~ $277,471 TOTAL SUPPORT SALARY 15.5 $525,462 14.4 $502,030 14.4 $488,518 15.4 $526,564 TOTAL (10-20) ~ $2,584,578 ~ $2,692,045 ~ $2,685,666 ~ $2,737,886 TOTAL(30)  $183,959 ~ $198,959 ~ $214,521 iai $215,603 ,M:u1\n~~\n- 1--::c::~+:=-~-i~..:.~i-f'-l~a..:./c=': 0 ~-'a~'- 11 ....:~~..:.e_m __ __, ______ ...,..__._. ...... --$6,--3-,9-84--.~j:\n\n, ~,~,. ~., .,.,. ,.,-~1---$-:-:7--9--,,3--3-1=.i...: ,,,,::::\"\"::::,,.::::: +---c$-4-9-,1-:6-8.,..=: ...,:.:.,,,\n,,::::\n:+:- --c-$4- 9-,1-6-8-- 1 (40) 28 Media ~ $9,352 -~ $9,547 ~ $15,700 ~ $15 ,700 CAPITAL OUTLAY (50) 29 Other ~ $2,172 -~ - $2,923 - $4,000 ~ $4,000 TOTAL(40) m. $75,508 ~ $91,801 ~ $68,868 ~ $68,868 30 Equipment ~ $17,579 ~ $15,510 ~ $27,300 ~ $27,300 31 Building Repair, etc. 32 Other TOTAL(S0) ~ $17,579 ~ $15,510 ~ $27,300 fflffi $27,300 OTHER 33 Dues and Fees ~ $1,377 ~ $1,764 ~ $4,500 ~ $4,500 (60) 34 Other T~~\nt~6-~o) = $2~~:!~ = ~:~:. $3~:~~~ = $3~:~~~ TOTAL (10-60) 79.8 $2,863,000 79.7 $3,000,079 79.7 $3,000,855 80.7 $3,054,157 TOTAL LINE ITEM -(SECOND PAGE) ~ $137,573 ~ $109,678 ~ $201,987 ~ $210,72-i @WMi4.~iffit'MttMiWW ~ \\U~Q.$'.1$.( ~ t~1lterv ~ - :~mJf4ti ~ #}.$$J~\naa1\\ l~li~~llllll\n:il!11llllllll!l!lli!li::!JII!: \n\n~:,:c:m :~:\n~~r \n\n~~i:trn ~!1!~!et:tt Stipends $4,378 $4,530 $4,600 $4,600 Other Objects Indirect Costs $104,172 $80,835 $162,057 $170,794 Vocational $14,932 $8,890 $16,000 $16,000 Athletics $13,857 $14,777 $14,500 $14,500 Gifted Programs Plant Services $229 $3,450 $3,450 Reading $115 $115 Science English ($467) $345 $345 Special Education $473 $646 $920 $920 )0()()()()( )0()()()()( )0()()()()( Rtf P.ObJt\nCostt't'.'Y':''?'?\\\n' i.~~===t\u0026lt; 1'~Q4t}''=''.' t~S$.\\P::= 1fflfmt==t='t 3rd Ctr. ADM or Proj. 836.3 827.8 835.0 835.0 Total Costs $3,000,573 $3,109,757 $3,202,842 $3,264,881 eereup11coatrv\\:::zr:~:1 ::\n:,=:.:+a :ssa:= \n\n::wss:mr ::p=-rctS:t:836== ==,-:==yr\n:fl\nm:o=: M:!1:J!~~~~~:\u0026lt;:t:=i1::12i:~:i\n~ :\n::=\n:\n~:~:=:::::1:~1:~: =~\n! :1:=~r~'\n'.:,::i\n:1 ~~r :\n::\n:::::~:::\n::::\n~~:: :r:,: ~\n: / CERTIFIED 01 Principal 1.0 $62,517 1.0 $64,582 1.0 $65,747 1.0 $66,149 STAFF 02 Asst. Prln. 3.0 $119,256 3.0 $152,394 3.0 $153,428 3.0 $154,354 03 Specialists 9.8 $221 ,882 9.8 $301,371 9.8 $266,815 9.8 $301 ,364 04 Counselors 3.0 $118,446 3.0 $124,940 3.0 $129,841 3.0 $131,047 05 MediaSpec. 1.0 $33,013 1.0 $34,026 1.0 $34,026 1.0 $34,344 06 Art-Perf./Prod. 07 Music 08 Foreign Lang. 09 Vocational 7.0 $302,605 7.0 $276,023 7.0 $214,076 7.0 $216,625 1 o Special Education 1.2 $51,899 1.5 $53,457 1.5 $53,457 1.5 $53,956 11 Gifted 12 Classroom 39.6 $1,370,962 39.6 $1,371,266 39.6 $1,416,539 39.6 $1 ,372,986 13 Substitutes $49,179 $45,634 $51,640 $51,640 14 Other-Kindergarten 1.0 $39,485 1.0 $40,670 1.0 $40,670 1.0 $41,050 TOTAL CERTIFIED SALARY 66.6 $2,369,244 66.9 $2,464,363 66.9 $2,426,239 66.9 $2,423,513 SUPPORT 15 Secretaries 6.0 $123,490 6.0 $143,706 6.0 $111 ,962 6.0 $1 12,943 $19,416 $116,365 STAFF 16 Nurses 0.6 $18,790 0.6 $19,416 0.6 $14,453 0.6 17 Custodians 8.0 $113,791 8.0 $120,368 8.0 $115,043 8.0 18 Paraprofesslonals-Chptr 1 19 Paraprofessionals-Other 5.0 $122,263 5.0 $97,365 5.0 $108,916 5.0 $109,408 20 Other-Aides 2.0 $14,005 2.0 $11,308 2.-0 $23,616 2.0 $23,616 21 Fringe Benetits(20) ~ $346,012 ~ $313,946 ~ $315,107 ~ $311,325 TOTAL SUPPORT SALARY 21.6 $738,351 21.6 $706,109 21 .6 $689,097 21.6 $693,072 TOTAL(10-20) ~ $3,107,595 ~ $3,170,472 ~ $3,115,336 ~  $3,116,586 PURCHASED 22 Utilities ~ $179,513 ~ $213,303 ~ $183,100 ~ $183,753 SERVICES t-2-3+T-r-av_e_l --------t\n~,\n,,\nC.~\n,\nJl.\"'\"$,... ----\n@:l,.\n,\nS~\n,i+\n ...---$.,...1-,3-1...,.0.\nQ:j,\n,\n'~\"'Jl\n' ..t---$.,...1-,5-0_0,J\"\"\"o\n,~\n-\n~\n\"\n':,i+: --$,-6-,0-0-,---iO (30) 24 MalntenanceAgreements ~ ~ ~ ~iiiiiiiii:ii 25 Other l~~ $18,792 ~ -- $40,933 ~ $14 750   $10,000 TOTAL(30) ).~~ $198,305 ~ $255,546 -~ - $199:350 ~--- ---'$1:...9:~9,~75:...:3~ , MATERIALS, i-:2::6t-Pr:..:.:in.:.:c:.:!:lp:.::a::.,:l's:..0:::.f:..:.:fi=-ce=-------iilft\n~\n/:,\n:\n:\n:J\nJ.i ---:--:-:----:-c.i.\niJ\u0026amp;:l\n.\nm'.\n:\n\n:\n,~---=-=--=--::--l\n~~:\n\u0026gt;\n,:::\nJ.:- --=--=-=-~--F.,\ni~~::\n:\n:\n\n:\n4: - - -----1 SUPPLIES 27 Regular Classroom ~  $92,439 ~ $74,513 ~  $98,173 ~  $101,065 (40) 28 Media ~ $13,753 ~ $5,415 :~ $7,642 ~  $7,100 CAPITAL OUTlAY (50) OTHER (60) 29 Other ~ $3,136 ~ $6,336 ffl $6,100 ~ $6,000 TOTAL(40) ~ $109,327 ~ $86,264 ~ $111,915 ~ $114,165 30 Equipment ~ $23,092 ~  $11,086 - $16,000 - $15,000 31 Building Repair, etc. 32 Other TOTAL (50) ~ $23,092 ~ - $11,086 - $16,000 ~  $15,000 33 Dues and Fees ~  $5,809 ~ $4,675 ~ $5,000 ~  $4,000 34 Other ~ ~ ~  TOTAL (60) ~ $5,809 ~ $4,675 ~ $5,000 ~ $4,000 TOTAL (30-60) mm $336,534 ~ $357,571 ~ $332,265 ~ $332,918 TOTAL (10-60) 88.2 $3,444,128 88.5 $3,528,043 88.5 $3,447,601 88.5 $3,449,504 TOTAL LINE ITEM S-(SECOND PAGE) ~ - $135,955 ~ - $101,049 ~ - $190,036 ~ $229,152 (Jt iM\u0026lt;!QBMIJlffP rAVt@Wt   ..   : ''\".' .J~m~ -\n:n~ :~ :~ =1::~uinm~ :: -$3,6!.tt~ Stipends $1,353 $2,519 $1,425 $1,425 Other Objects Indirect Costs $105,548 $75,743 $153,323 $192,439 Vocational $14,932 $8,332 $16,000 $16,000 Athletics $13,884 $13,850 $14,500 $14,500 Gifted Programs Plant SeNices $232 $3,420 $3,420 Reading $114 $114 Science English ($473) $342 $342 Special Education $479 $605 $912 $912 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Total Line Items $135,955 $101,049 $190,036 $229,152 e~eow1\n Kr:::\n:\nx7\n:g: iffl\n\n:\n:\n::\n:~m~\n:\ns\n18M+.SS::\n:v\n18.ffi::x\n:\n3rd Otr. ADM or Proj. 848.3 775.3 790.0 790.0 Total Costs $3,580,083 $3,629,092 $3,637,637 $3,678,656 fffltiPlili:\u0026gt;.lt:C.o.it%!W%MWW JMJ.MM~zao.t W#Wf.4.i~tf M%%M'$0$.i tWM\nt1J.Jas=1.t ADDITIONAL CLERICAL POSITION I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The district is committed to safe, secure school environments, accurate attendance reporting, sound financial accounting, and to the educational, social and emotional growth of all its students. We at Mann are involved daily with our expected responsibility and obligation to our school community. Our goal continues to focus on and to carry out district mandates effectively and efficiently. We eagerly accept our charge, remaining one of the district's successful schools. Due to the complex nature of being a magnet, this business case proposes an additional clerical position, making it possible for us to continue our goals at an optimal level. A Background Mann Magnet serves a consistent enrollment of 850 students from all three school districts: Little Rock, North Little Rock, and Pulaski County. There is an urgent need to establish and maintain a sense of community for our diverse population. Our clientele of parents have high expectations because, for the most part, we represent for them an opportunity to explore an attractive curriculum in a public school setting. Our students are transported to us on different buses, and since they must perform, attend mandated field trips, participate in activities relating to science and the arts--our two specialty areas, we must provide nurturing, after school duty, and support for them. Through the years, there have also been increased demands on administrative staff to take care of extra clerical needs, related to attendance, possible litigating concerns, and other reporting. These demands lessen the effectiveness of the Assistant Principals, taking away from their expected job responsibilities. There are three secretaries in our office--principal's secretary, registrar and bookkeeper/attendance secretary, a slot of which either area--attendance or bookkeeping--constitutes a full-time job. B. Problem Given the recent increase of paperwork and all requirements connected with it, assistant principals are devoting an inordinate amount of time to clerical minutiae. Normally, these certified personnel staff members should be Clerical Position assisting with improvement of instruction and implementing disciplinary interventions for our students. There are a number of factors contributing to this problem:  Mann serves a diverse population from the three schools districts, making it necessary to establish a sense of community which is county wide versus that which is typically found  in an area neighborhood school.  There are increased demands on administrators due to attendance accounting accuracy.  Existing clerical personnel are overextended with a myriad of daily responsibilities connected with the effective, efficient running of a junior high school. C. Analysis of Alternatives The administrative team and clerical staff generated and analyzed alternatives: 1. Train and maintain a strong volunteer pool of parents to give clerical assistance. a. Breach of confidentiality is possible. b. Consistent pattern of service and times needed is lacking. 2. Seek clerical assistance from the district's pool of secretaries. a. Not available at this point 3. Seek additional monetary resources for existing clerical staff, that is for one who has a night/evening job. An advantage is that one person could do both jobs, using time away from the regular job hours\nthis is more economical for the district. A disadvantage is possible burn-out plus the possibility of being misunderstood as preferential treatment for staff member involved. Clerical Position Page 3 4. \"Do Nothing.\" The bookkeeper/ attendance slot is unattractive to employees, causing dissatisfaction with oneself because of daily overload. Assistant principals will not receive relief from menial tasks at hand. 5. Hire an additional clerical person, who would serve as attendance secretary and as an aide for the assistant principals. This will best accomplish Mann's needs. 6. Half-time Person. While this may look attractive and cost effective, the job is not such that it can be accomplished effectively in one half day. The job's responsibility continues throughout the school day hours. D. Recommendation It is recommended that a clerical position be added to Mann's clerical staff, giving relief to the bookkeeper/ attendance slot and to the assistant principal's paperwork burden. This addition would give the assistant principals more time to share their expertise in professional ways, such as disciplinary intervening and instructional improvement. E. Objectives The objective of this recommendation is to preserve and maintain an effective school which keeps a positive image for our district. F. Impact Analysis The addition of a clerical position will allow assistant principals to give attention to their expected job responsibility, rather than to clerical duties. Furthermore, the position of bookkeeper/attendance secretary will be divided into a more workable and manageable job responsibility, making for sound financial accounting and accurate attendance reporting. This addition of a clerical staff member will have a positive impact on the Desegregation Plan because of the added effectiveness and efficiency that are certain to occur. Assistant principals will be able to assist more with the Clerical Position Page 4 academic, and social environment of Mann, helping to maintain a sense of community for the parents, students, and staff. G. Resource Analysis It is estimated that $15,000 would be more than enough for this position and minimal training would be required. H. Force Field Analysis Primary supporters of this proposal will be the principal, all assistant principals and office staff. Also, parents, teachers and students will benefit. The primary detractors will be those who dislike the magnet school concept. I. General Implementation Plan The principal, working with the Human Resources Director, will have the responsibility of implementing this increase in staff. August 1995 is the desired beginning time. J ' Magnet Review Committee 1900 North Main Street  Suite 101 North Little Rock, Arkansas 72114 Donna Grady Creer Executive Oirector June 26 , 1995 The Honorable Susan Webber Wright Judge , U.S. District Court Eastern District of Arkansas 600 West Capitol Suite 302 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Judge Wright: JUN 2 1995 'i~CO .-, ..,., Oltice of Deseg~s\n2:\ncn :1,cr.,io\n:ng ... . ... At its June 13, 1995 meeting, the Magnet Review Committee, by formal motion and unanimous 6-0 vote, approved the interdistrict magnet schools budget for the six original magnet schools for the 1995-96 school year (Draft 2). The total amount budgeted, $14,614,360, is based on a per pupil expenditure of $4,140 per student and a projected thirdquarter enrollment of 3,530 students. This budget shows an increase of $87.00 per student over the 1994-95 budget. As you know, the Little Rock School District and the CTA are currently in salary negotiations. At the same time, Little Rock School District is requesting a reduction of (501 ) 758-0156 two days in the school year which, in turn, will also impact the salary negotiations. Consequently, at the conclusion of the salary negotiations, the salary figures in the enclosed budget submitted for approval may have to be re-calculated. When the information from the salary negotiations is received, the budget may have to be revised for your approval. It is the intention of the Magnet Review Committee, therefore, to submit this budget with the recognition that some flexibility may be necessary. The Magnet Review Committee respectfully requests the Court's review and approval of the 1995-96 interdistrict magnet schools budget attached herewith. The Magnet Review Committee is committed to maintaining the existing quality of the interdistrict magnet schools. We will continue to work with the host district as we exercise The Honorable Susan Webber Wright -2- June 26, 1995 stringent oversight of the magnet schools budget in an effort to achieve and ensure efficient management and cost containment to the greatest extent possible. Sincerely, !fi~m, Chairperson Magnet Review Committee BA/DGC:sl Attachment: 1995-96 Interdistrict Magnet Schools Budget (Approved Draft 2) cc: Ann Brown, Federal Monitor - Office of Desegregation Monitoring CERTIFIED STAFF SUPPORT STAFF 01 Principal 6.0 02 Asst. Prin. 10.0 03 Specialists 37.2 04 Counselors 10.4 05 Media Spec. 6.5 06 Art-Perl./Prod. 0.0 07 Music 0.0 08 Foreign Lang. 0.0 09 Vocational 12.6 10 Special Education 7.8 11 Gifted 5.0 12 Classroom 177.6 13 Substitutes 0.0 14 Other-Kindergarten 14.0 TOTAL CERTIFIED SALARY 287.1 15 Secretaries 19.0 16 Nurses 5.4 17 Custodians 28.5 18 Paraprofessionals-Chptr 1 0.0 19 Paraprofessionals-Other 6.0 20 Other-Aides 39.5 21 Fringe Benefits(20) ~ - TOTAL SUPPORT SALARY 98.4 TOTAL(10-20) ~ PURCHASED 22 Utilities ~ SERVICES 23 Travel ~ (30) 24 Maintenance Agreements bxio.\u0026amp; 25 Other ooixloo TOTAL (30) @.ijif MATERIALS, 26 Principal's Office SUPPLIES 27 Regular Classroom (40) 28 Media CAPITAL OUTLAY (50) 29 Other TOTAL (40) 30 Equipment 31 Building Repair, etc. 32 Other $m!riS #.l:~ ~ ~ $357,193 $438,462 $1 ,078,799 $356,314 $222.455 $0 $0 $0 $489,335 $245,166 $159,822 $5,354,901 $147,417 $426,571 $9,276,435 $355,081 $148,996 $335,694 $0 $143,913 $256,806 $1,366,607 $2,607,097 $11,883,532 $507,373 $33,980 6.0 10.0 39.2 12.4 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.6 7.7 5.4 175.9 0.0 14.0 289.7 19.0 5.4 28.5 0.0 6.0 37.0 ~ 95.9 ~ ~ ~ ~ $92,772 ~ - $634,125 ~: ~: $309,128 ~ $53,842 ~ $11,647 ~ $374,617 ~ $106,283 ~ $375,279 6.0 $433,972 10.0 $1,211 ,895 39.2 $405,435 12.4 $224,104 6.5 $0 0.0 $0 0.0 $0 0.0 $483,977 12.6 $282,681 7.7 $158,016 5.4 $5,377,867 175.9 $182,975 0.0 $448,552 14.0 $9,584,753 289.7 $360,333 19.0 $156,152 5.4 $360,957 28.5 $0 0.0 $122,210 6.0 $237,662 37.0 $1,213,301 ~ $2,450,615 95.9 $12,035,368 ~: $598,876 $20,580 ~ ~  $119,669 ~: $739,125 ~ - ~ $ 328,856 ~ $ 34 ,277 ~ $18,873 ~ $382,006 ~ $67,029 ~ TOTAL (50) ~ $106,283 ~ - $67,029 ~ OTHER (60) 33 Dues and Fees 34 Other ~ - $12,416 ~ - $13,017 ~ $340,086 6.0 $473,907 10.0 $1 ,224,208 39.2 $452,360 12.4 $230,137 6.5 $0 a.a $0 0.0 $0 a.a $404,921 12.6 $263,527 8.2 $189,153 5.4 $5,582,275 175.9 $154,925 0.0 $459,595 14.0 $9,775,094 290.2 $323,508 20.0 $155,272 . 5.4 $355,219 29.0 so a.a $132,853 6.0 $270,749 37.0 $1,282,054 ~ $2,519,655 97.4 $12,294,749 ~ $619,066 ~ $33,907 ~ ~ $74,250 ~ . $727,223 ~: $302,337 ~ $57,242 ~ $19,510 ~ $379,089 ~ $93,646 ~ $93,646 ~ - $15,655 ~ ~ $346,907 $477,647 $1 ,266,529 $456,579 $233,047 $0 $0 $0 $409,206 $283,351 $190,921 $5 ,642,152 $154,990 $463,885 $9,925,214 $337,934 $160,236 $372,933 $0 $142,764 $278,875 $1 ,297,521 $2,590,263 $12,515,477 $626,335 $38,500 $69,500 $734,335 $313,418 $57,100 $16,800 $387,318 $86,598 $86,598 $14,500 TOTAL (60) #.~~ $12,416 ~ $13,017 ~ $15,655 ~ $14,500 TOTAL(30-60) ~ $1,127,441 ~ - $1,201,177 ~ $1,215,613 ~ $1,222,751 TOTAL (10-60) 385.5 $13,010,969 385.6 $13,236,545 385.6 $13,510,362 387.6 $13,738,228 TOTAL LINE ITEl~S- (SECOND PAGE) ~ $537,465 ~ $413,629 ~ $796,728 ~ $876,136 w\nrn\nma~~~n@m ~ \\\\t.t$8~~ : --.- \u0026lt; ~)il.14$50~1x.~m ~ mit4tt'~490i ~ J$14,614t.\u0026lt;r ~ ......---.. -~ - ... , ,~~ i: ~--- - \n/,iii j 1)t_/1.\" 'j II i 1 i} 1r,o~ \\..,\\,..\n\n.... , ::J '. CC \"1 1\u0026gt; Mg!}~f,fil:,S~. ......:.r.,._...: '. .. :. : .!..: _i.:.:.:.:.::r,':.:.l:\n.:..r . .::\n:,.:,:.\n.:  :.i\n.. ~:::~::ai.tr ::t=Aciuw.:  t:::(Jud~ \u0026lt; nrnBvd.t:tt \n: \n':.::rx:: 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 Stipends $19,871 $16,269 $29,125 $29,125 Other Objects Indirect Costs $458,905 $348,726 $685,103 $764,511 Vocational $29,864 $17,222 $32,000 $32,000 Athletics $27,741 $28,627 $29,000 $29,000 Gifted Programs $51 $500 $500 Plant Services $1,009 $15,000 $15,000 Reading $500 $500 Science English ($2,058) $1 ,500 $1,500 Special Education $2,082 $2,785 $4,000 $4,000 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Total Line Items $537,465 $413,629 $796,728 $876,136 fflitiPcltitl:P.~lrnnmm:mrn ,~~%MM ,~$.!W1%W W$J.4f$.6(@@t:! ,~ ~(\\%Pl 3rd Otr. ADM or Proj. 3679.6 3570.5 3530.0 3530.0 Total Costs $13,548,434 $13,650,174 $14,307,090 $14,614,360 Pwf Pti$1'Cost,:,\n:t\n#N%Wl %M/%$3.iffllz.\n%f\\i\ni%$3:HZJili W@lW\\$4:fOS.$?: U@i@l$4MM\u0026gt;0 CERTIFIED 01 Principal 1.0 $52,699 1.0 $54,600 1.0 $55,764 1.0 $56.095 STAFF 02 Asst. Prln. 1.0 $51,060 1.0  $52,028 1.0 $52,028 1.0 $52,334 03 Specialists 7.0 $239,870 7.0 $253,810 7.0 $247,392 7.0 $245,325 04 Counselors 1.4 $35,997 2.0 $79,221 2.0 $66,806 2.0 $67.430 05 Media Spec. 1.0 $35,134 1.0 $37,012 1.0 $37,836 1.0 $38,190 06 Art-Perf./Prod. 07 Music 08 Foreign Lang. 09 Classroom 30.2 $926,604 30.2 $907,324 30.2 $937,495 30.2 $985,475 10 Special Education 1.3 $49,377 1.3 $51,124 1.3 $51,389 1.3 $51,869 11 Gifted 1.0 $34,242 1.0 $36,073 1.0 $36,876 1.0 $37,222 12 Chapter 1 13 Substitutes $17,757 $24,191 $20,000 $20,000 14 Other-Kindergarten 4.0 $110,916 4.0 $120,022 4.0 $125,362 4.0 $12f 532 TOTAL CERTIFIED SALARY 47.9 $1,553,656 48.5 $1,615,405 48.5 $1,630,948 48.5 $1,f 80,472 SUPPORT 15 Secretaries 2.0 $30,341 2.0 $46,344 2.0 $31,932 2.0 $31 ,932 STAFF 16 Nurses 1.0 $25,725 1.0 $27,301 1.0 $28,104 1.0 $28,104 17 Custodians 4.0 $42,176 4.0 $44,290 4.0 $51,384 4.0 $51,384 18 Paraprofesslonals-Chptr 1 19 Paraprofessionals-Other 20 Other-Aides 8.0 $64,657 7.0 $37,000 7.0, $63,323 7.0 $63,624 21 Fringe Benefits(20) ~ $225,867 ~ $198,345 ~  $209,385 ~ $214,360 TOTAL SUPPORT SALARY 15.0 $388,766 14.0 $353,280 14.0 $384,128 14.0 $389,405 TOTAL(10-20) ~ $1,942,422 ~ $1,968,685 ~ $2,015,076 ~ $2,069,877 PURCHASEDi,.:2:::2+::-U'-'-til_itl_es _____- -1.\na\n,\n,\n1).\na\n,\n:+~+ _$7., ...1..:..,4,-9_2-+,,,ilo\n,\u0026gt;o,\n,\n*+.\n~+:_ __\n_$7...\n5..:..,6_7~6-+jc,,\n)i:l~,\n,.\n.,,'i\u0026gt;\n,+--$-:84,-'-::,1..,.15.,.....,~,,,,)\\:l,\n,\n{\u0026gt;.,\n,~,\n\n..--$-:8--:c5~,2-=-50-:--i SERVICES i,.:2:::34 T.\n_r..,\na_ve_l _____- -1.,,Xl-\n,\n~~,,..~.~. . . . . _$ 4__\n_,654_...,,.,o,,,,\u0026amp;).,,:c\u0026lt;}.,., +__$ 4__\n_,9_3_9-+jc.,,\u0026lt;i~,O~*.,,~t---$-5'-,0_00--i':.,~ ~'  $5,000 (30) 24 Maintenance Agreements ~ ~ ~ ~ 25 Other ~ $4,895 ~  $13,548 l~f $9,500 ~  $9,500 TOTAL(30) ~  $81,041 ~  $94,163 l~f $98,615 ~ $99,750 MATERIALS, ~26==4:..Pr\n,\nln.:.::c~ip:.::a:,,:l's\n..O::::..f\n,\nfic::::..e:___ _- -!._~..,\n.. \n\n.'.\n..\n.. .,\n\n.\n i.--7::-::-::,::~li~\n,oo..,.\nt\ni?.'.41i.i.,ij +---::-,-,-c-=-=-!i~~~J.\u0026gt;~.o.i~t\u0026gt;'.t--=-:---=-::-c:-+.~~,:~:-~~\u0026lt;+--=-=-==- SUPPLIES 'Zl Regular Classroom ~ $37,774 ~ . $44,436 ~ $34,900 ~ . $35,155 (40) 28 Media iiJc:m. $4,743 ~  $5,380 ~ $4,800 ~ $4,800 CAPITAL OUTLAY (50) OTHER (60) 29 Other ~ $1,255 ~ $2,624 ~ $1,255 i#ffi $1,000 TOTAL(40) tii. $43,772 ~ $52,440 ~ $40,955 ffl_ffi $40,955 30 Equipment ~ $10,090 ~ $12,832 ~ $6,000 ~ $6,000 31 Building Repair, etc. 32 Other TOTAL(S0) ~ $10,090 ~ $12,832 ~ $6,000 ~  $6,000 33 Dues and Fees 34 Other ~ TOTAL (60) ~ $0 ~ $0 ~ $0 ~ $0 TOTAL (30-60) ~ $134,903 ~ $159,435 ~ $145,570 ~ $146,705 TOTAL(10-60) 62.9 $2,077,325 62.5 $2,128,120 62.5 $2,160,646 62.5 $2,216,582 TOTAL LINE ITEMS-(SECOND PAGE) ~  75446.0 ~ $59,394 ~ $113,512 ~ $126,220 :: 1992-93 Other Objects Indirect Costs $75,260 Vocational Athletics Gifted Programs $16 Plant Services $166 Reading Science English ($337) Special Education $341 XXXlOO( )()()()()()( XXXJOO( Total Line Items $75,446 1993-94 $1,500 $57,435 $459 $59,394 1994-95 1995-96 $109,849 $122,557 $155 $155 $2,505 $2,505 $84 $84 $251 $251 $668 $668 $113,512 $126,220 e.~tetimi::e.~wmrw:irmrr i~tmnt i~~mr:rni 1~mi:rn1 i~wrt 3rd Ctr. ADM or Pro]. 604.4 588.0 566.0 566.0 Total Costs $2,152,n1 $2,187,514 $2,274,158 $2,342,801 Per-,PUoll'.Cosl'f\\,w\u0026gt;,-,.,,.,\n.\n,t,h ,c}.,6dEJ!56Z:S :,,,,,,:,.,,dt.:JU20c .,,-,,fa.,,,v,ota, :,,.,i,,,,.,,., . .. 139!' CERTIFIED STAFF 01 Principal 1.0 02 Asst. Prin. 1.0 03 Specialists 7.0 04 Coun:\nelors 1.6 05 Media Spec. 1.5 06 Art-Perf./Prod. 07 Music 08 Foreign Lang. 09 Classroom 23.0 1 O Special Education 1.0 11 Gifted 1.0 12 Chapter 1 13 Substitutes 14 Other-Kindergarten 4.0 TOTAL CERTIFIED SALARY 41 .1 $57,676 1.0 $32,092 1.0 $212,014 8.0 $50,547 2.0 $43,532 1.5 $572,789 24.3 $30,734 1.0 $32,46f:I 1.4 $16,814 $116,101 4.0 $1,164,768 44.2 $67,263 1.0 $49,235 1.0 $52,141 $41,640 1.0 $39,569 1.0 $40,782 $245,103 8.0 $259,133 8.0 $263,095 $45,473 2.0 $62,791 2.0 $63,378 $47,207 1.5 $48,443 1 .5 $48,896 $581 ,394 24.3 $690,567 24.3 $698,233 $33,001 1.0 $26,869 1.5 $44,484 $47,830 1.4 $45,303 1.4 $45,726 $12,271 $17,150 $1 7,1 50 $117,112 4.0 $120,344 4.0 $1 21 ,467 $1 ,238,294 44.2 $1 ,359,404 44.7 $1,395 ,351 SUPPORT 15 Secretaries 3.0 $65,657 3.0 $60,742 3.0 $50,964 3.0 $49,502 STAFF 16 Nurses 1.0 $29,857 1.0 $31,556 1.0 $32,359 1.0 $32,359 17 Custodians 4.0 $34,361 4.0 $43,531 4.0 $41 ,956 4.0 $44,188 18 Paraprotessionals-Chptr 1 19 Paraprofessionals-Other 20 Other-Aides 11.0 $71,921 11.0 $75,921 11.-0 $78,184 11.0 $88,772 21 Fringe Benellts(20) ~ $190,533 ~ $171,444 ~ $191 ,607 ~ $198,572 TOTALSUPPORTSALARY 19.0 $392,329 19.0 $383,194 19.0 $395,070 19.0 $413,392 TOTAL(10-20) ~  $1,557,097 t~f $1,621 ,488 ~ -- $1 ,754,474 ~ $1,808,743 PURCHASED 22 Utilities ~ - $53,586 ~ - $66,973 ~: $75,965 ~ - ~77,413 SERVICES ~2\n,\n,3~T=r'-a--'-ve-:-l.\n__ _____- !..i. e~s__. ___ t--s=-=1-:::2\"'=,25:=-3:::-+!.ef\nc~i.\u0026amp;\n\u0026gt;*\u0026lt;t--'--::$78'-\"..4-::-64:--f.!~mi)#i/jiceooJ - t----:::s-='9,'-=oo-::-:o:-+-~~e~:~-,A. t---- S9,ooo (30) 24 Maintenance Agreements ~ ~ - ~ : 25 Other iXlQODQ $9,911 ~ $13,840 ~ - $10,700 ~  $10,700 TOTAL(30) ~ $75,750 ~ $89,277 ~ $95,665 ~ $97,113 MATERIALS, L:2:.=::6+.::-P_rin.....:c-!'lp_a-:::l's':--0.\n_l_flc.:...e\n,.._ __+ ~!iii)i\n~~~~~~t-----:=-===-+~~lti~~+*~t-----:~-:-:::::-til!~~m ~~tii!::t-----:==::-t!l~','!':i'i''!\u0026lt;'!'l~mi------:==:- SUPPUES r27 Regular Classroom ~ $52,759 !~ $54,466 ~ ~ $63,330 t~f $63,330 (40) 28 Media ~ - $13,271 ~: $5,356 m\niji: $11,500 ~  $11,500 CAPITAL OUTLAY (50) OTHER (60) 29 Other ~ - $2,593 ~: $3,498 ~ $3,500 ~ - $3,500 TOTAL(40) ~ - $68,623 ~:: $63,320 #.a'' $78,330 ~ - $78,330 30 EQulpment !\u0026amp;'laoo': $27,894 ~ - $19,490 ~ - $19,000 ~  $19,000 31 Building Repair, etc. 32 Other TOTAL (50) ~ $27,894 ~ $19,490 ~ $19,000 ~ $19,000 33 Dues and Fees ~ $3,908 ~ $5,643 ~ $3,000 a# $3,000 34 Other TOTAL (60) ~ - $3,908 ~ - $5,643 ~ - $3,000 ~ $3,000 TOTAL(30-60) ~i $176,174 ~ - $177,730 ~ - $195,995 ~ $197,443 TOTAL(10-60) 60.1 $1,733,271 63.2 $1,799,218 63.2 $1,950,469 63.7 $2,006,186 TOTAL LINE ITEMS-(SECOND PAGE) ~ $86,058 ~ $64,923 ~ $129,543 ~ $128,244 ~::~:~!:E:~::!!::!~~:!::l:!::!'.'.::!!~ ~~\n~~:\u0026lt;I\n~\n~~\u0026lt; ~~!~~~~nt ~\n~~~eltm Stipends $12,453 $6,044 $13,100 $13,100 Other Objects Indirect Costs $73,425 $58,412 $112,956 $111,657 Vocational Athletics Gifted Programs $15 $145 $145 Plant Services $162 $2,385 $2,385 Reading $82 $82 Science English ($329) $239 $239 Special Education $333 $467 $636 $636 XXXJOO( XXXJOO( XXXJOO( Total line Items $86,058 $64,923 $129,543 $128,244 Mimlffl.1,:09~\\:iiWWlliiNW '-~tWM 1-UW/WNP 1~iM@ t~~i:lP 3rd Ctr. ADM or Pro]. 588.3 597.9 582.0 582.0 Total Costs $1,819,329 $1,864,141 $2,080,012 $2,134,430 Ri.t~O:WC.oa.t#\\WM%%@ :@Mti~ !~ i MRW($$ff.18'.i %%%$3.!$.1.-iG \\%Kl$$1~ i: CERTIFIED 01 Principal 1.0 $56,515 1.0 $59,233 1.0 $44,496 1.0 $46,919 STAFF 02 Asst. Prin. 03 Specialists 1.0 5.8 $55,922 $160,752 1.0 1.0 $43,068 1.0 $43,328 5.8 $127,098 5.8 ' $154,817 5.8 $164,219 04 Counselors 1.0 $39,485 1.0 $40,670 1.0 $40,670 1.0 $41,050 05 Media Spec. 1.0 $36,471 1.0 $38,684 1.0 $39,257 1.0 $39,624 06 Art-Perf./Prod. 07 Music 08 Foreign Lang. 09 Classroom 17.0 $482,159 15.0 $462,587 15.0 $433,026 15.0 $435,1 54 1 O Special Education 1.5 $53,235 1.5 $70,319 1.5 $52,851 1.5 $53,344 11 Gifted 1.0 $35,493 1.0 $33,443 1.0 $34,246 1.0 $34,566 12 Chapter 1 13 Substitutes $13,666 $11,733 $14,000 $14,000 14 Other-Kindergarten 2.0 $52,144 2.0 $57,912 2.0 $59,580 2.0 $60,136 TOTAL CERTIFIED SALARY 31 .3 $985,841 29.3 $901 ,679 29.3 $916,011 29.3 $932,340 SUPPORT 15 Secretaries 2.0 $27,701 1.4 $15,692 1.4 $18,779 1.4 $18,779 STAFF 16 Nurses 0.8 3.0 $11,304 0.8 $11 ,856 0.8 $12,446 0,8 $12,446 17 Custodians $33,776 3.0 $39,012 3.0 $39,803 3.0 $39,803 18 Paraprofesslonals-Chptr 1 19 Paraprofessionals-Other 20 Other-Aides 6.0 $26,782 5.6 $33,307 5.6 - $32,907 5.6 $33,445 21 FringeBenefltS(20) ~ $141,032 ~ $114,688 ~ $123,740 ~ $124,1392 TOTAL SUPPORT SALARY 11.8 $240,594 10.8 $214,555 10.8 $227,675 10.8 $2'.'9,365 TOTAL(10-20) ~ - $1,226,435 ~ $1,116,234 ~ $1,143,686 ~ $1,161,705 TOTAL(30) ~ $36,254 ~ - $42,173 Qiiie $48,792 ~ - $49,763 MATERIALS, 26 Principal's Office SUPPLIES 27 Regular Classroom ~ ~ ~ ~ xxlooa: $23,541 ~ $20,882 ~ $25,068 ~ $25,000 (40) 28 Media ~ $6,489 ~ $3,934 m.iP. $6,600 ~ $8,000 CAPITAL OUTLAY (50) OTHER (60) 29 Other ~ - $1,016 ~ $1,397 ~ $2,455 ~ TOTAL(40) ~ $31,046 ~ $26,213 -~.- $34,123 fiti': $33,000 30 EQuipment ~ - $2,594 ~ $1 ,312 ~ $2,646 ~ $3,700 31 Building Repair, etc. 32 Other TOTAL(SO) ~ $2,594 ~ $1,312 ~ $2,646 ~ $3,700 33 Dues and Fees ~ $1,132 ~ - $215 ~ $1,155 ~ $1,000 34 Other TOTAL(60) ~ - $1,132 ~ $215 ~ $1,155 ~ $1,000 -TOTAL(30-60) ~ $71,025 ~ $69,913 ~ $86,716 ~ $87,463 TOTAL (10-60) 43.1 $1,297,460 40.1 $1,186,147 40.1 $1,230,402 40.1 $1,249,168 TOTAL LINE ITEI AS-(SECOND PAGE) ~ $41,553 ~ $29,105 ~ $57,993 ~ $70,963 W\u0026lt;? G~~OilOl~A@w: -~ r~-~,~~EM~13i\n~ il1~t$.~2:: ~ :1'\u0026amp;88~39\u0026amp;    :ffi .. ,~~1$.V ~f~~~'~\n~\n!::\nl!li:i:\n::/1::::::!\n:: \n~~=\n::~:~\n=::::::::\n::::~::\n\n::!~::::\n:: Stipends $150 Other Objects Indirect Costs $41,301 $28,874 $56,089 $69,059 Vocational Athletics Gifted Programs $8 $80 $80 Plant Services $91 $1,305 $1,305 Reading $42 $42 Science English ($185) $129 $129 Special Education $187 $231 $348 $348 XXXXlO( xxxxxx XXXXlO( P.iteQ~i~ tNWMMMW ,~~wrnt 1~~ff{l 1~twx )~Qe:bt} 3rd Otr. ADM or ProJ. 329.0 295.7 289.0 289.0 Total Costs $1,339,013 $1,215,252 $1,288,395 $1,320,131 Pitlmi10QatffWUlrnmrn 1:Mi%~Q1([ W1%%Mftf.O.\\: Wfmi$1.J5tU WM\u0026amp;$ifSG\u0026amp;  1~:=l\nIUOGEll~0P-OSA~DRAFT?}..  .. $2 .. \u0026amp;3. j2-93- = 93--9f.I.@ ~-~ .,.,. ~95 ,( .94-9$,.,. .as~-8\u0026amp; wm~MagnetSchool\"'\n   :.   F .. T.E. Actual F.T.E Aetuaf. \\. F,T.E. Budget .F.1:E. CERTIFIED 01 Principal 1.0 $64,174 1.0 $65,081 1.0 $60,588 1.0 STAFF 02 Asst. Prin. 1.0 $36,843 1.0 $38,931 1.0 $40,047 1.0 l-:0:-:3-+.:::Sp:....ec_ia-.lis_ts ____- 1-----,-4.\n..o.:-+--'-::--:-~,...,--f--..::.:..:.+__\n$:..:1..:..73=..:,.=.23:.:0+-5.0 $182,894 5.0 04 Counselors 1.4 $45,279 1.4 $41,011 1.4 $141,471 5.0 $40,611 1.4 05 Media Spec. 1.0 $34,592 1.0 $25,446 1.0 $28,846 1.0 06 Art-Perf./Prod. 07 Music 08 Foreign Lang. 09 Classroom 21.0 $631 ,616 20.0 $630,446 20.0 10 Special Education 1.5 $13,370 1.1 $25,764 1.1 11 Gifted 2.0 $57,618 2.0 $40,670 2.0 12 Chapter 1 13 Substitutes $15,588 $17,314 14 Other-Kindergarten 3.0 $107,925 3.0 $112,836 3.0 TOTAL CERTIFIED SALAR 35.9 $1,143,808 35.5 $1,174,997 35.5 SUPPORT 15 Secretaries 2.0 $42,678 2.6 $27,786 2.6 STAFF 16 Nurses 1.0 $31,904 1.0 $33,664 1.0 17 Custodians 3.5 $43,163 3.5 $44,866 3.5 18 Paraprofesslonals-Chptr 1 19 Paraprofessionals-Other 20 Other-Aides 9.0 $32,748 9.0 $37,175 9.0 21 Fringe Benefils(20) ~ $171,101 ~ . $147,956 XiOxl\u0026lt; TOTAL SUPPORT SALARY 15.5 $321,594 16.1 $291,447 16. 1 TOTAL(10-20) ~ $1,465,402 ~. $1,466,444 ~ . PURCHASEC 22 Utilities ~ $38,623 ~ $44,468 -~ SERVICES 23 Travel ~ $3,793 ~ $4,601 ~ (30) 24 Maintenance Agreements ~ ~ ~ 25 Other iiiicboor $16,400 ~ $9,938 ~- TOTAL(30) ~i'.)!~ $58,816 ~  $59,007 ~ MATERIALS, 26 Principal's Office ~ ' ~ ~  SUPPLIES 27 Regular Classroom -it $38,631 ~t $55,228 ~ (40) 28 Media ~ $6,234 ~ $4,645 ~ ' CAPITAL OUTLW (50) 29 Other . $1,475 ~ $2,095 ~ TOTAL(40) ~ $46,341 ~ $61,968 ~ 30 Equipment ~ $25,034 ~ $6,799 ~ 31 Building Repair, etc. ~  imxf ~  32 Other ximSl ~ ~ TOTAL (50) ~ $25,034 ~ $6,799 ~  OTHER 33 Dues and Fees ~ $190 ~ $720 ~ (60) 34 Other ~ ~ ~ $660,714 20.0 $28,877 1. 1 $72,728 2.0 $16,000 $113,639 3.0 $1,245,344 35.5 $41,377 2.6 $35,551 .1.0 $46,660 4.0 $44,618 9.0 $166,961 ~ $335,167 16.6 $1,580,511 ~ $57,280 ~ $5,000 \u0026amp;.ffl ~ $8,000 ~ $70,280 ~ ~ - $31,698 ~ $11,000 ~ $2,200 ~ $44,898 ~ $22,700 ~ $22,700 ~ $2,000 ~ -gs:.\n~ /c audgat\\: $60,956 $40,205 $184,602 $41,394 $29,874 $691,929 $29,146 $73,407 $16,000 $114,700 $1,282,212 $39,684 $35,551 S5 i,012 $41,317 $170,901 $338,466 $1,620,677 $59,353 $5,000 $8,000 $72,353 $39,700 $10,000 $2,300 $52,000 $15,598 $15,598 $2,000 TOTAL(60) ~ $190 ~ $720 ~ $2,000 ~ $2,000 TOTAL(30-60) ~ $130,381 ~ $128,494 ~ $139,878 ~ $141,951 TOTAL(10-60) 51.4 $1,595,783 51.6 $1,594,938 51.6 $1,720,389 52.1 $1,762,628 TOTALUNEITEHS-(SECONDPAGE) ~  $60,881 ~ $49,480 ~ $103,657 ~ $11 0,833 M::k:i 8.NO:lJ'QT.4k,:::f\\t~ :#l:l~~~+   .   Wlf$.0~j.1U:i~ Hlti82Al~:,   :tt.t\nt.73,46.:g 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 Stipends $1,537 $1,676 $10,000 $10,000 Other Objects Indirect Costs $59,199 $47,427 $90,829 $98,005 Vocational Athletics Gifted Programs $12 $120 $120 Plant Services $130 $1,935 $1,935 Reading $63 $63 Science English ($265) $194 $194 Special Education $269 $377 $516 $516 lOOOOO( xxxxxx xxxxxx Total Line Items $60,881 $49,480 $103,657 $110,833 Per:Poptl,Co$t\\MM#MUtJ ,~~\nmw i:fffli\niM:'@d tBti%i# 1~$.6.MM 3rd Qtr. ADM or Proj. 473.3 485.8 468.0 468.0 Total Costs $1,656,664 $1,644,418 $1,824,046 $1,873,461 PetptJ,,CostWW:%@%f@, \u0026amp;HW\nl:t$00/ @@\u0026amp;!138$.f WiM/$3''- it.JfaKMtoo.31. 1~~8.UOOET PAOPOSAL(DRAFT\n?)- . . 92-93  S2-93 ~ t 93-$4 94-95 $4-9$ ~:-~ -95-96\" MANN:'Maai atSc\nhoo.l .  ' :.,~. i=:i:e r .Actual t F.tEt\n=:~, \\,, F-T.E %Boog.~ ) \"F:lSE ) 'Budget CERTIFIED 01 Principal 1.0 3.0 3.6 $63,612 1.0 $64,520 1.0 $64,256 1.0 $64 ,647 STAFF 02 Asst. Prin. 03 Specialists $143,289 $102,810 3.0 $148,979 3.6 $111,283 3.0 3.6 $145,767 $113,157 3.0 3.6 $1 46,644 $107,924 04 Counselors 2.0 $71,228 3.0 $69,852 3.0 $111,241 3.0 $112,280 05 Media Spec. 1.0 $39,713 1.0 $41 ,729 1.0 $41,729 1.0 $42,119 06 Art-Pert./Prod. 07 Music 08 Foreign Lang. 09 Vocational 5.6 $186,730 5.6 $207,954 5.6 $190,845 5.6 $192,581 10 Special Education 1.3 $46,551 1.3 $49,016 1.3 $50,084 1.3 $50,552 11 Gifted 12 Classroom 46.8 $1,370,771 46.8 $1,424,850 46.8 $1,443,934 46.8 $1 ,458,375 13 Substitutes $34,413 $71,832 $36,135 $36,200 14 Other TOTAL CERTIFIED SALARY 64.3 $2,059,117 65.3 $2,190,015 65.3 $2,197,148 65.3 SUPPORT 15 Secretaries 4.0 $65,214 4.0 $66,063 4.0 $68,494 5.0 $85,094 $32,360 $70,181 STAFF 16 Nurses 1.0 $31,416 1.0 $32,359 1.0 $32,359 1..0 17 Custodians 6.0 $68,427 6.0 $68,890 6.0 $60,373 6.0 18 Paraprofessionals-Chptr 1 19 Paraprofessionals-Other 1.0 $21,650 1.0 $24,845 1.0 $23,937 1.0 $33,356 20 Other-Aides 3.5 $46,693 2.4 $42,951 2.4 $28,101 2.4 $28,101 21 Fringe Benefits(20) ~ $292,062 ~ $266,922 ~ $275,254 ~ $277,471 TOTAL SUPPORT SALARY 15.5 $525,462 14.4 $502,030 14.4 $488,518 15.4 $526,564 TOTAL (10-20) ~ $2,584,578 ~ $2,692,045 ~ $2,685,666 ~ $2,737,886 PURCHASEDL22--1~U_til_it'~1e_s _____ -+\n,:~~*~i~'.~:'._$~1~37~, 7 28~0,--+.\n,~~!C}~~~--:x~:_s_1~6_2,~8 7 74:-t'~~'.'.m' :m~~-$~1~77 7 ,~2 7 21:-tit~im~.rn--$~1~78~, 7 30=:3:-1 SERVICES t-.:r2::.:3+T:..::rac...ve.:c.l _- :----~fi\n!~\u0026gt;.\u0026lt;~i..,.i.:.\n+_....:$-'-1 ....:1'. ::.21_4-iiii~.,..\u0026amp;~\u0026amp;Xl.-:iS,\nf, _ ___\n,$_\n_\n1' c::2.:c66,.:.~i'is{\u0026gt;~m~ _...\n$\n....1..:..0,:..:.0.:c00:c..+,~\n,\n~H _ __\n$_1 0.....:_Oo_o..., (30) 24 Maintenance Agreements ~  ~ ~  ~ 25 Other ~ $35,464 icxP..i: $34,819 ~ : $27,300 ~ $27,300 $215,603 TOTAL (30) =.:. :: .:::.: $183,959 ii=.l $198,959 ~.:..::.. .: :. :..:.::.:.:: $214,521 ~ .-MA-TERI------AL---:S-, .... 26~--P-rln_c.,..ip-a..,\n.l's..::O~lfl=-ce=!.--~~.,._,\n,\n~-~.:..:.:c=-f i ,_. ,_ ~ SUPPLIES i-.:2::.:7:.+:,,R~eg....:u~la:..::r~c~1ass=r=-oo~m---....i~\n~'.-~~~:-. -~$~637 , 7984~~.c~)om::o.~..o:..:: *c-~s~179,~3731~~:,-~g~~H:-~$4:-=9,~1~68:--#~~.J3~i~.H\n---=$~49~,716~8:-1 (40) 28 Media ~ $9,352 ~ : $9,547 ~ $15,700 ~: $15,700 CAPITAL OUTLAY (50) OTHER (60) 29 Other ~ $2,172 :ioo\"i:ioo $2,923 ~ $4,000 ~ $4,000 TOTAL (40) ffi $75,508 ~ . $91,801 ~ $68,868 ~: $68,868 30 Equipment ~ $17,579 ~: $15,510 ~ $27,300 ~ $27,300 31 Building Repair, etc. 32 Other TOTAL (50) ~ $17,579 ~ $15,510 ~ $27,300 ~ $27,301) 33 Dues and Fees ~ $1,377 ~ $1,764 ~  $4,500 ~ 34 Other TOTAL(60) ~ $1,377 iloo(xf $1,764 ~ $4,500 ~ 4,500 -TOTAL(30-60) ~ $278,422 ~  $308,034 ~ $315,189 ~ $316,271 TOTAL(l0-60) 79.8 $2,863,000 79.7 $3,000,079 79.7 $3,000,855 80.7 $3,054,157 TOTAL LINE ITEMS-(SECOND PAGE) ~ $137,573 ~ $109,678 ~ $201,987 ~ $210,724 :~(l~mt\u0026amp;.Nrnmw ~\n:p~ooo\ns1s.\ni m#x 1:Clti(i8\n1s1w ~ ris12~m ~ @$~\n264~t l~!1~1~l!!ll~f1!!i:!!:!:ii!:ji:~~~\\! ~1:~:\nt ~:::~={) ~:~~attrn !~::~~~!et') Stipends $4,378 $4,530 $4,600 $4,600 Other Objects Indirect Costs $104,172 $80,835 $162,057 $170,794 Vocational $14,932 $8,890 $16,000 $16,000 Athletics $13,857 $14,777 $14,500 $14,500 Gifted Programs Plant Services $229 $3,450 $3,450 Reading $115 $115 Science English ($467) $345 $345 Special Education $473 $646 $920 $920 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx f'erfupJ{ .. .C~.::::'.::::::,:::'':27%.'' i~9~fY':'.'.'.1~$4:t\nt\\ i~t:'4 1E'.~'.''i'S'). 3rd Ctr. ADM or Pro\n. 836.3 827.8 835.0 835.0 Total Cos1s $3,000,573 $3,109,757 $3,202,842 $3,264,881 ffiii,J?up/1 (AAdf\\\u0026lt; :i h\u0026lt;\\ Y ':.\\$3NIB::: '', 4 ~ 1$1, \u0026gt;t,$3,~ i \"'\u0026lt;~JhOi CERTIFIED 01 Principal 1.0 $62,517 1.0 $64,582 1.0 $65,747 STAFF 02 Asst. Prln. 3.0 $119,256 3.0 $152,394 3.0 $153,428 SUPPORT STAFF 03 Specialists 9.8 $221,882 9.8 $301 ,371 9.8 $266,815 04 Counselors 3.0 $118,446 3.0 $124,940 3.0 $129,841 05 Media Spec. 1.0 $33,013 1.0 $34,026 1.0 $34,026 06 Art-Perl./Prod. 07 Music 08 Foreign Lang. 09 Vocational 7.0 $302,605 7.0 $276,023 7.0 $214,076 10 Special Education 1.2 $51 ,899 1.5 $53,457 1.5 $53,457 11 Gifted 12 Classroom 39.6 $1,370,962 39.6 $1 ,371,266 39.6 $1,416,539 13 Substitutes $49,179 $45,634 $51,640 14 Other-Kindergarten 1.0 $39,485 1.0 $40,670 1.0 $40,670 TOTAL CERTIFIED SALARY 66.6 $2,369,244 66.9 $2,464,363 66.9 $2,426,239 15 Secretaries 6.0 $123,490 6.0 $143,706 6.0 $111 ,962 16 Nurses 0.6 $18,790 0.6 $19,416 0.6 $14,453 . 17 Custodians 8.0 $113,791 8.0 $120,368 8.0 $115,043 18 Paraprofessionals-Chptr 1 19 Paraprofessionals-Other 5.0 $122,263 5.0 $97,365 5.0 $108,916 20 Other-Aides 2.0 $14,005 2.0 $11,308 2.-0 $23,616 21 Fringe Beneflts(20) b\u0026amp;loo6i $346,012 ~ $313,946 xxx,cn $315,107 TOTALSUPPORTSALARY 21 .6 $738,351 21.6 $706,109 21 .6 $689,097 TOTAL(10-20) .l $3,107,595 ~ $3,170,472  :: $3,115,336 9$,-96  Ffr::E f 1.0 3.0 9.8 3.0 1.0 7.0 1.5 39.6 1.0 66.9 6.0 0.6 8.0 5.0 2.0 XXlOOO( 21.6 ~ 95-96 Budget $66,149 $154,354 $301,364 $131 ,047 $34,344 $216,625 $53,956 $1,372,986 $5 1,640 $41,050 $2,423,513 $112,943 $19,416 $116,365 $109,408 $23,616 $311 ,325 $693,072 $3,11 6,586 $179,513 ~ ~ PURCHASED~22~~Ut~il~ltl~es,\n__ ____ ~~~~\"~~~:#4:_-'--'----i'-'~+.+--~$-21_3~,3~0~3~00!*-\u0026lt;~~#\u0026lt;*-~~--:--'--:--++F'+----:-:--'--:--I SERVICES 23 Travel ~ $1,310 ~ $183,100 ~ $1 83,753 $1,500 ~ $6,000 (30) 24 Maintenance Agreements ~ ~ ~ ~ 25 Other ~ . $18,792 ~ $40,933 ~~: $14,750 ~  TOTAL(30) MATERIALS, 26 Principal's Office SUPPLIES 27 Regular Classroom (40) 28 Media CAPITAL OUTLAY (50) OTHER (60) 29 Other TOTAL(40) 30 Equipment 31 Building Repair, etc. 32 Other TOTAL(50) 33 Dues and Fees 34 Other ~ .: $198,305 ~ $255,546 ~  $199,350 ~ ~'. ~ ~ . ~: ~  $92,439 ~: $74,513 ~ - $98,173 ~ -. ~ $13,753 ~ $5,415 ~ $7,642 ~ ~ $3,136 ~ $6,336 ~ $6,100 ~ ~ $109,327 ~ $86,264 ~ $111 ,915 ~ ~ $23,092 ~ $11,086 ~ $16,000 ~ ~ $23,092 i~ $11,086 ~ $16,000 ~  ~ - $5,809 ~ $4,675 ~ $5,000 ~ $10,000 $199,753 $101,065 $7,100 $6,000 $114,165 $15,000 $15,000 $4,000 TOTAL (60) ~ $5,809 ~ $4,675 ~ $5,000 ~ $4,000 TOTAL(30-60) ~ $336,534 ~ $357,571 ~ $332,265 ~ $332,918 TOTAL(10-60) 88.2 $3,444,128 88.5 $3,528,043 88.5 $3,447,601 88.5 $3,449,504 TOTALLINEITEM$-(SECONDPAGE) ~ $135,955 ~ - $101,049 ~ $190,036 ~ $229,152 ''' ., Qr\nANtt.J:Qt~MiMW :. . :. %1t$.80~0\u0026amp;.3 -~ \u0026amp;{~\n~  : :: tt~i6$V ~ ~ {l3~~8t(j5:S !!\n:~!!\n!!!!:::!::!:!!i!:::~!!\n:::! ~'\n!~:tn ~\n~~t' ~~~:arnm ~::~~e.Fl+ Stipends $1,353 $2,519 $1,425 $1,425 Other Objects Indirect Costs $105,548 $75,743 $153,323 $192,439 Vocational $14,932 $8,332 $16,000 $16,000 Athletics $13,884 $13,850 $14,500 $14,500 Gifted Programs Plant Services $232 $3,420 $3,420 Reading $114 $114 Science English ($473) $342 $342 Special Education $479 $605 $912 $912 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Total Line Items $135,955 $101,049 $190,036 $229,152 gjt,pm(C.i#.tMWAMMM# ,~~HJW 1-.\n~t{W': j9Q4fflt%W 1-=-.wmn 3rd Otr. ADM or ProJ. 848.3 ns.3 790.0 790.0 Total Costs $3,580,083 $3,629,092 $3,637,637 $3,678,656 iiijJWD(t~MJ?:i!tifil~ f.W!@W~zao.tl ~1l%%~1J.i84tf Wt@tM~SOJ.1 ~llftfil~ i-)..t ADDITIONAL CLERICAL POSITION I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The district is committed to safe, secure school environments, accurate attendance reporting, sound financial accounting, and to the educational, social and emotional growth of all its students. We at Mann are involved daily with our expected responsibility and obligation to our school community. Our goal continues to focus on and to carry out district mandates effectively and efficiently. We eagerly accept our charge, remaining one of the district's successful schools. Due to the complex nature of being a magnet, this business case proposes an additional clerical position, making it possible for us to continue our goals at an optimal level. A Background Mann Magnet serves a consistent enrollment of 850 students from all three school districts: Little Rock, North Little Rock, and Pulaski County. There is an urgent need to establish and maintain a sense of community for our diverse population. Our clientele of parents have high expectations because, for the most part, we represent for them an opportunity to explore an attractive curriculum in a public school setting. Our students are transported to us on different buses, and since they must perform, attend mandated field trips, participate in activities relating to science and the arts-our two specialty areas, we must provide nurturing, after school duty, and support for them. Through the years, there have also been increased demands on administrative staff to take care of extra clerical needs, related to attendance, possible litigating concerns, and other reporting. These demands lessen the effectiveness of the Assistant Principals, taking away from their expected job responsibilities. There are three secretaries in our office--principal's secretary, registrar and bookkeeper/attendance secretary, a slot of which either area-attendance or bookkeeping--constitutes a full-time job. B. Problem Given the recent increase of paperwork and all requirements connected with it, assistant principals are devoting an inordinate amount of time to clerical minutiae. Normally, these certified personnel staff members should be Clerical Position Page 2 C. assisting with improvement of instruction and implementing disciplinary interventions for our students. There are a number of factors contributing to this problem:  Mann serves a diverse population from the three schools districts, making it necessary to establish a sense of community which is county wide versus that which is typically found in an area neighborhood school.  There are increased demands on administrators due to attendance accounting accuracy.  Existing clerical personnel are overextended with a myriad of daily responsibilities connected with the effective, efficient running of a junior high school. Analysis of Alternatives The administrative team and clerical staff generated and analyzed alternatives: 1. Train and maintain a strong volunteer pool of parents to give clerical assistance. a. Breach of confidentiality is possible. b. Consistent pattern of service and times needed is lacking. 2. Seek clerical assistance from the district's pool of secretaries. a. Not available at this point 3. Seek additional monetary resources for existing clerical staff, that is for one who bas a night/evening job. An advantage is that one person could do both jobs, using time away from the regular job hours\nthis is more economical for the district. A disadvantage is possible burn-out plus the possibility of being misunderstood as preferential treatment for staff member involved. Clerical Position Page 3 4. \"Do Nothing.\" The bookkeeper/attendance slot is unattractive to employees, causing dissatisfaction with oneself because of daily overload. Assistant principals will not receive relief from menial tasks at hand. 5. Hire an additional clerical person, who would serve as attendance secretary and as an aide for the assistant principals. This will best accomplish Mann's needs. 6. Half-time Person. While this may look attractive and cost effective, the job is not such that it can be accomplished effectively in one half day. The job's responsibility continues throughout the school day hours. D. Recommendation It is recommended that a clerical position be added to Mann's clerical staff, giving relief to the book.keeper/ attendance slot and to the assistant principal's paperwork burden. This addition would give the assistant principals more time to share their expertise in professional ways, such as disciplinary intervening and instructional improvement. E. Objectives The objective of this recommendation is to preserve and maintain an effective . school which keeps a positive image for our district. F. Impact Analysis The addition of a clerical position will allow assistant principals to give attention to their expected job responsibility, rather than to clerical duties. Furthermore, the position of book.keeper/ attendance secretary will be divided into a more workable and manageable job responsibility, making for sound financial accounting and accurate attendance reporting. This addition of a clerical staff member will have a positive impact on the Desegregation Plan because of the added effectiveness and efficiency that are certain to occur. Assistant principals will be able to assist more with the Clerical Position Page 4 academic, and social environment of Mann, helping to maintain a sense of community for the parents, students, and staff. G. Resource Analysis It is estimated that $15,000 would be more than enough for this position and minimal training would be required. H. Force Field Analysis Primary supporters of this proposal will be the principal, all assistant principals and office staff. Also, parents, teachers and students will benefit. The primary detractors will be those who dislike the magnet school concept. I. General Implementation Plan The principal, working with the Human Resources Director, will have the responsibility of implementing this increase in staff. August 1995 is the desired beginning time. , Magnet Review Committee 1900 North Main Street  Suite 101 North Little Rock, Arkansas 72114 Donna Grady Creer Executive Director (501 ) 758-0156 June 26, 1995 The Honorable Susan Webber Wright Judge, U.S. District Court Eastern District of Arkansas 600 West Capitol Suite 302 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Judge Wright: II' t\nqg S DISl\"R!CT JUDGE At its June 13, 1995 meeting, the Magnet Review Committee, by formal motion and unanimous 6-0 vote, approved the interdistrict magnet schools budget for the six original magnet schools for the 1995-96 school year (Draft 2). The total amount budgeted, $14,614,360, is based on a per pupil expenditure of $4,140 per student and a projected thirdquarter enrollment of 3,530 students. This budget shows an increase of $87.00 per student over the 1994-95 budget. As you know, the Little Rock School District and the CTA are currently in salary negotiations. At the same time, Little Rock School District is requesting a reduction of two days in the school year which, in turn, will also impact the salary negotiations. Consequently, at the conclusion of the salary negotiations, the salary figures in the enclosed budget submitted for approval may have to be re-calculated. When the information from the salary negotiations is received, the budget may have to be revised for your approval. It is the intention of the Magnet Review Committee, therefore, to submit this budget with the recognition that some flexibility may be necessary. The Magnet Review Committee respectfully requests the Court's review and approval of the 1995-96 interdistrict magnet schools budget attached herewith. The Magnet Review Committee is committed to maintaining the existing quality of the interdistrict magnet schools. We will continue to work with the host district as we exercise The Honorable Susan Webber Wright -2- June 26, 1995 stringent oversight of the magnet schools budget in an effort to achieve and ensure efficient management and cost containment to the greatest extent possible. Sincerely, {!i~m, Chairperson Magnet Review Committee BA/DGC:sl Attachment: 1995-96 Interdistrict Magnet Schools Budget (Approved Draft 2) cc: Ann Brown, Federal Monitor - Office of Desegregation Monitoring -- - - - -- ::::,,,- - 1'1agnet Review Co1nmittce Donna Grady Creer Executive Director March 13, 1996 1900 cirth Main Street Suite 1()1 North Little Rock, Arkansas 72114 - - =--.=---, --:,'\"'!!.'\\ - .. 1 t -  -  The Honorable Susan Webber Wright Judge, U. S. District Court Eastern District of Arkansas 600 West Capitol Suite 302  ' .... Little Rock, AR 7220 l Dear Judge Wright: ...: In a letter dated June 26, 1995, the Magnet Review Committee submitted the l 995-96 interdistrict magnet schools budget (labeled Draft 2) in the amount of 514,614,360 sc , - sa-01s.\nfor your approval. The total amount budgeted was based on a per-pupil expenditure of $4,140 per student and a projected third-quarter enrollment of 3,530 students. This budget showed an increase of 587.00 per student over the 1994-95 budget. However, since that time, the LRSD and the MRC have revised the budget\no better reflect the current status of the six original magnet schools, taking actual personnel salaries into account which reflect the results of finalized contract negotiations. Additionally, the actual number of students enrolled in the six original magnet schools has increased. These factors have resulted in a downward adjustment for the l 995-96 budget from $4,140 per-pupil expenditure to $4,063 per pupil, a decrease of 577.00 per student from the projected budget (Draft 2) submitted to you on June 26, 1995, with a resulting overall increase of S l 0.00 per student over the 1994-95 budget. The total revised budget amount for the 1995-96 magnet schools budget is now $14,788,255. The Magnet Review Committee approved this revised budget (Draft 3) during its regular meeting on February 27, 1996. The MRC now respectfully requests your approval. The Magnet Review Committee is committed to maintaining the existing quality of the interdistrict magnet schools. One of our primary goals is to ensure efficient and effective cost containment while continuing to deliver attractive instructional programs. We will continue to work with the host district as we exercise prudent oversight of the magnet schools' budget. Thank you for your consideration and response to this important matter. Sincerely, ~~/,J.. Dr. Bobby Altom, Chairperson Magnet Review Committee Attachment: 1995-96 lnterdistrict Magnet Schools Budget (Approved Draft 3) cc: Ann Brown, Federal Monitor - ODM Magnet Review Co1nmittt!e Donna Grady Creer Executive Director March 13, 1996 1900 North Main Street Suite 101 North Little Rock, Arkansas  7'.?.114 -. ... ,._ - -,,..,-_~-\"'\\ ----,'. ~ . t ... -- . - - - The Honorable Susan Webber Wright Judge, U. S. District Court Eastern District of Arkansas 600 West Capitol Suite 302 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Judge Wright: ..... . ,  .... In a letter dated June 26, 1995, the Magnet Review Committee submitted the 1995-96 interdistrict magnet schools budget (labeled Draft 2) in the amount of S 14,614,360 ,so, l ~sa-01 s.:\nfor your approval. The total amount budgeted was based on a per-pupil expenditure of 54,140 per student and a projected third-quarter enrollment of 3,530 students. This budget showed an increase of 587.00 per student over the 1994-95 budget. However, since that time, the LRSD and the MRC have revised the budget to better reflect the current status of the six original magnet schools, taking actual personnel salaries into account which reflect the results of finalized contract negotiations. Additionally, the actual number of students enrolled in the six original magnet schools has increased. These factors have resulted in a downward adjustment for the 1995-96 budget from 54,140 per-pupil expenditure to 54,063 per pupil, a decrease of $77.00 per student from the projected budget (Draft 2) submitted to you on June 26, 1995, with a resulting overall increase of S 10.00 per student over the 1994-95 budget. The total revised budget amount for the 1995-96 magnet schools budget is now $14,788,255. The Magnet Review Committee approved this revised budget (Draft 3) during its regular meeting on February 27, l 996. The MRC now respectfully requests your approval. The Magnet Review Committee is committed to maintaining the ex,sting quality of the interdistrict magnet schools. One of our primary goals is to ensure efficient and effective cost containment while continuing to deliver attractive instructional programs. We will continue to work with the host district as we exercise prudent oversight of the magnet schools' budget. Thank you for your consideration and response to this important matter. Sincerely, ~ ~/,\"- Dr. Bobby Altom, Chairperson Magnet Review Committee Attachment: 1995-96 lnterdistrict Magnet Schools Budget (Approved Draft 3) cc: Ann Brown, Federal Monitor - ODM Donna Grady Creer Executive Director March 13, 1996 Magnet Review Ccnnmittee 1900 North Main Street  Suite 101 North Little Rock, Arkansas 72114 The Honorable Susan Webber Wright Judge, U. S. District Court Eastern District of Arkansas 600 West Capitol Suite 302 Little Rock, AR 7220 l Dear Judge Wright: In a letter dated June 26, 1995, the Magnet Review Committee submitted the 1995-96 interdistrict magnet schools budget (labeled Draft 2) in the amount of $14,614,360 (501 ) 758-0150 for your approval. The total amount budgeted was based on a per-pupil expenditure of $4,140 per student and a projected third-quarter enrollment of 3,530 students. This budget showed an increase of $87.00 per student over the 1994-95 budget. However, since that time, the LRSO and the MRC have revised the budget to better reflect the current status of the six original magnet schools, taking actual personnel salaries into account which reflect the results of finalized contract negotiations. Additionally, the actual number of students enrolled in the six original magnet schools has increased. These factors have resulted in a downward adjustment for the 1995-96 budget from $4,140 per-pupil expenditure to $4,063 per pupil, a decrease of $77 .00 per student from the projected budget (Draft 2) submitted to you on June 26, 1995, with a resulting overall increase of $10.00 per student over the 1994-95 budget. The total revised budget amount for the 1995-96 magnet schools budget is now $14,788,255. The Magnet Review Committee approved this revised budget (Draft 3) during its regular meeting on February 27, 1996. The MRC now respectfully requests your approval. The Magnet Review Committee is committed to maintaining the existing quality of the interdistrict magnet schools. One of our primary goals is to ensure efficient and effective cost containment while continuing to deliver attractive instructional programs. We will continue to work with the host district as we exercise prudent oversight of the magnet schools' budget. Thank you for your consideration and response to this important matter. Sincerely, /3,--uy ~/ ,d Or. Bobby Altom, Chairperson Magnet Review Committee Attachment: 1995-96 lnterdistrict Magnet Schools Budget (Approved Draft 3) C Se./t' !!J /\" .. ! ,,,,nt!'1I cc: Ann Brown, Federal Monitor - OOM F.Y.I. To:-,.......:c..:.:~'---- ,a, I ,I From: ......_......:\n. __ _ Return D Keep or Recycle IS  Magnet Review Committee 1900 North Main Street  Suit~ 101 North Little Rock, Arkansas 72114 Donna Grady Creer Executive Director March 6, 1996 The Honorable Susan Webber Wright Judge, U.S. District Court Eastern District of Arkansas 600 West Capitol Suite 302 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Judge Wright: (501) 758-0156 R CE L=\nf,,,,J.- Ot. f,'vt n ./ I -\n:,\n2.,, ...... 4J!ic.e-. of ()est~,rc-~atlo:1 Mor:,,.\nr\n,11) In a letter dated June 26, 1995, the Magnet Review Committee submitted the 1995-96 interdistrict magnet schools budget (labeled Draft 2) in the amount of $14,614,360 for your approval. The total amount budgeted was based on a per-pupil expenditure of $4,140 per student and a projected third-quarter enrollment of 3,530 students. This budget showed an increase of $87 .00 per student over the 1994-95 budget. Since that time, the budget has been revised to better reflect the current status of magnets, taking salaries into account which reflect the results of finalized contract negotiations and an increased number of students. These factors have resulted in an adjustment from $4,140 per-pupil expenditure to $4,063 per pupil, a decrease of $77 .00 per student from the budget (Draft 2) submitted to you on June 26, 1995, or an increase of $10.00 per student over the 1994-95 budget. The total revised budget amount for the 1995-96 magnet schools budget is now $14,788,255. The Magnet Review Committee approved this revised budget (Draft 3) during its regular meeting on February 27, 1996. To date, a response has not been received from the Court with regard to the budget previously submitted. Since we are now well into the 1995-96 school year, and the State of Arkansas cannot release additional fu'nds for per-pupil expenditure without Court-ordered approval (in this case, it is $10.00 per student over the 1994-95 budget), the Magnet Review Committee is respe~tf ully requesting your approval of the revised 199 5-96 interdistrict magnet schools budget. The Magnet\nReview Committee is committed to maintaining the existing quality of the interdistrict magnet schools. One of our primary goals is to ensure efficient and effective cost containment while continuing to deliver attractive instructional The Honorable Susan Webber Wright -2- March 6, 1996 programs. We will continue to work with the host district as we exercise prudent oversight of the magnet schools' budget . Thank you for your consideration and response to this important matter. Sincerely, 13~~ Dr. Bobby Altom, Chairperson Magnet Review Committee Attachment: 1995-96 lnterdistrict Magnet Schools Budget !Approved Draft 3) cc: Ann Brown, Federal Monitor - ODM 1995-96 BUDGET PROPOSAL(ORAFT 3) 93-~ 93.94 SUMMARY FOR MAGNET SCHOOLS (.w : .. :- ..=:~ ET.E.  'Actual CERTIFIED 01 Principal 6.0 $375,279 STAFF 02 Asst Prin. 10.0 $433,972 03 Specialists 39.2 $1 ,211,895 04 Counselors 12.4 $405,435 05 Media Spec. 6.5 $224,104 06 Art-Perf./Prod. 0.0 $0 07 Music 0.0 $0 08 Foreign Lang. 0.0 $0 09 Vocational 12.6 $483,977 10 Special Education 7.7 $282,681 11 Gifted 5.4 $158,016 12 Classroom 175.9 $5,377,867 13 Substitutes 0.0 $182,975 14 Other-KinderQarten 14.0 $448,552 TOTAL CERTIFIED SALARY 289.7 $9,584,753 SUPPORT 15 Secretaries 19.0 $360,333 STAFF 16 Nurses 5.4 $156,152 17 Custodians 28.5 $360,957 18 Paraprofessionals-Chptr 1 0.0 $0 19 Paraprofessionals-Other 6.0 $122,210 20 Other-Aides 37.0 $237,662 21 Fringe Benefits(20 x:'IOOr:xXX' $1,213,301 TOTAL SUPPORT SALARY 95.9 $2,450,615 TOTAL (10-20) XXXXXlO( $12,035,368 PURCHASED 22 Utilities ~ $598,876 SERVICES 23 Travel ~ $20,580 (30) 24 Maintenance Ai:ireements ~ 25 Other i:ii!i:iix $119,669 TOTAL(30) xmxxx $739,125 MATERIALS, 26 Principal's Office ~ SUPPLIES 27 Regular Classroom ii$3\u0026amp;xic $328,856 (40) 28 Media xrim:x $34,277 29 Other ~ $18,873 TOTAL (40) xxxxli:xx $382,006 CAPITAL 30 Equipment ~ $67,029 OUTLAY 31 Building Repair, etc. XXXXX)O( (50) 32 Other rixri:xx TOTAL(S0) 'iJ:iiiii_ $67,029 OTHER 33 Dues and Fees xxxxxiix $13,017 (60) 34 Other ioixxli:ioc TOTAL(60) lO:Xioo\u0026amp; $13,017 TOTAL (30-60) lxxxxxicx $1,201,177 TOTAL (10-60) 385.6 $13,236,545 TOTAL LINE ITE:MS  (SECOND PAGE) i\u0026amp;oo\u0026amp; $413,629 :tr (\nRANO\nJOTAthM/=t: xrim:' @:$13\n650~17,f 94-95 94-95 94-95 ' 95-96 F.T.E.  Bud~I Actual, . F.T.E. 6.0 $340,086 $337,925 6.0 10.0 $473,907 $498,372 10.0 39.2 $1,224,208 $1,262,967 39.2 12.4 $452,360 $418,344 12.4 6.5 $230,137 $232,294 6.5 0.0 $0 0.0 0.0 $0 0.0 0.0 $0 0.0 12.6 $404,921 $408,793 12.6 7.7 $263,527 $303,215 8.2 5.4 $189,153 $197,313 5.4 175.9 $5,582,275 $5,544,709 176.9 0.0 $154,925 $141,654 0.0 14.0 $459,595 $430,419 14.0 289.7 $9,775,094 $9,776 ,005 291.2 19.0 $323,508 $331 ,216 20.0 5.4 $155,272 $153,060 5.4 28.5 $355,219 $351,307 29.0 0.0 $0 0.0 6.0 $132,853 $130,786 6.0 37.0 $270,749 $269,245 37.0 XlOClOOix $1,282,054 $1 ,221 ,134 JOOOO\u0026lt;XX 95.9 $2,519,655 $2,456,748 97.4 lOOOOOO( $12,294,7 ,i9 S 12,232,753 lOOO(XXX xxxio6oc $619,066 $529,201 )000000( l(XlOOOOC $33,907 $28,648 XXXlOOC( 00()0000( :xioo\u0026amp;xJi xioooooi $74,250 $125,316 lOOOOOO( xxxxxxx $727,223 $683,165 xxxxxxx xxxxxxx )000000( .i\u0026amp;o6ci\u0026amp; $302,337 $353,700 XlOOO(XX xiooiiixic $57,242 $38,223 fxiooo6ix i00006o: $19,510 $17,581 iooo\u0026amp;xx ~ $379,089 $409,504 i6ooo\u0026lt;xx JOOOOCXi( $93,646 $122,540 lOOOOOO( ilOOOOOO( xioooocx iiioo6ooc xxxxxxx iooo\u0026amp;xx $93,646 $122,540 xx:xiiXXX xx.iooooi $15,655 $13,975 xxxxfu riiiooiiooc iioooocx i006oooc $15,655 $13,975 iOOoo\u0026amp;x :iooooixx $1,215,613 $1,229,184 i\u0026amp;xxxxx 385.6 $13,510,362 $13,461,937 388.6 ri'xlixxx $796,728 $816,097 xxx:ioo6i rirox'\n$.'.i$14\n'30l\ntl90-:=  t?S14\n218\n030' xroxx Mt.., ..'.,. -.\u0026lt; , i_.,. 1990' ! Office of DeseQregat1cn Monitoring i. ..... ~ . .., 95-96 Budget $352,057 $464,082 $1 ,266,519 $465,882 $238,456 $425,646 $290,265 $195,300 $5,692,303 $154,990 $473,402 $10,018,902 $333,302 $160,858 $365,905 $142,191 $288,560 $1 ,320,650 $2,611,466 $12 ,630,368 $626,335 $38,500 $103,500 $768,335 $335,418 $57,100 $16,800 $409,318 $86,598 $86,598 $14,500 $14,500 $1,278,751 $13,909,119 $879,136 ()S1:4\n1B8\n'25S Unt.ftem:Costikt.lW@m WWAetuaHb \\\\Budget}+ Jt:Aettial}}} \\%Budget%/ L\u0026lt;~Fff/,L,~:s::\n:::~\u0026lt;a::\n:\n. 1993-94 1994-95 1994-95 1995-96 Stipends $16,269 $29,125 $18,594 $29,125 Other Objects Indirect Costs $348,726 $685,103 $735,687 $764,511 Vocational $17,222 $32,000 $15,065 $32,000 Athletics $28,627 $29 ,000 $25,586 $32,000 Gifted Programs $500 $498 $500 Plant Services $15 ,000 $17,460 $15,000 ReadinQ $500 $188 $500 Science English $1 ,500 $500 $1 ,500 Special Education $2,785 $4,000 $2,518 $4,000 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Total Line Items $413,629 $796,728 $816,097 $879,136 Paff\u0026gt;iipl(:t:on%%M@MM Ml't99:t:94dt +iJ99~@t }di~~-S i%f1995.\n96\\}t 3rd Qtr. ADM or Proj. 3570.5 3530.0 3522.8 3639.7 Total Costs $13,650,174 $14,307,090 $14,278,030 $14,788,255 l:P,lf Pllpil'Coitl.WW::NMW HJP(T:$3\n8231 ,::rtttl4,{f53\\ :\ng:,\nJp,:$4\n053 ,r:t#{l,4\n-063': 1996 ~Ince- or D eser\nrt::gdl:\n,., 1,. Jr ~vr r:g 1995-96 BUDGET PROPOSAL(DRAFT3} '  Book ff Mai:inet scii'bcifWiwt \u0026lt;\n\\ .,.. ' CERTIFIED 01 Principal STAFF 02 Asst. Prin. 03 Specialists SUPPORT STAFF 04 Counselors 05 Media Spec. 06 Art-Pen ./Prod. 07 Music 08 Foreign Lang. 09 Classroom 10 Special Education 11 Gifted 12 Chapter 1 13 Substitutes 14 Other-Kindergarten TOTAL CERTIFIED SALARY 15 Secretaries 16 Nurses 17 Custodians 18 Paraprofessionals-Chptr 1 19 Paraprofess:onals-Other 93-94 93-94 9+-95 . 94-95 .,. F .T:.E: ,,_, Actual \\ -.,. F.T.Ea ,  .. Budoet ': .. 1.0 $54,600 1.0 $55.764 1.0 $52,028 1.0 $52,028 7.0 $253,810 7.0 $247,392 2.0 $79,221 2.0 $66,806 1.0 $37 ,012 1.0 $37,836 30.2 $907,324 30.2 $937,495 1.3 $51 ,124 1.3 $51,389 1.0 $36,073 1.0 $36,876 $24,191 $20,000 4.0 $120,022 4.0 $125,362 48.5 $1,615,405 48.5 $1,630,948 2.0 $46,344 2.0 $31,932 1.0 $27,301 1.0 $28,104 4.0 $44,290 4.0 $51 ,384 '9+-95  $56,095 $52,333 $217.496 $67,432 $38,190 95-96 F-T.E. 1.0 1.0 7.0 2.0 1.0 $965,196 30.2 $51,870 1.3 $37,221 1.0 $25,235 $126,536 4.0 $1,637,605 48.5 $31,932 2.0 $28,104 1.0 $50.716 4.0 1995-96 $57,267 $37,008 $252,138 $70,167 $39,021 $992,776 $52,948 $38,031 $20,000 $127,935 $1 ,687,291 $32.424 $29,177 S52,596 20 Other-Aides 7.0 $37,000 7.0 $63,323 $55,860 7.0 $64,050 21 Fringe Benefits(20) JOOOOOO( $198,345 XlOOOOO( $209,385 $199.799 XXXlOOOC $216,151 TOTAL SUPPORT SALARY 14.0 $353,280 14.0 $384,128 $366,411 14.0 $394,398 TOTAL (10-20) XXlOOOO( $1,968,685 XlOOOOO( $2,015,076 $2,004,016 xxxxxxx $2,081,688 PURCHASEDi-:2:.:\n.24-U,\n....\nti...:\nliti.\n.,\nes\n__ ___- --,--,t~,,~\n.\n.~\n.~ , . -_\n_$7...:\n5.:..\n,,6,\n....\n76\n..ib o\ni.x\nx\ni\nii\nx.\n.\n.\n,\n.\n.\n1--........\n$,\n_84\n,.:..\n,1~15\n.+--~$~66..:..:,3.\n.\n93~'xicioocxx\n.\n.\n+--...:\n$.\n.,\n85:.:.:,2:..:.50=-I SERVICES 23 Travel riolioooo $4,939 IXlOOOOOC $5,000 $3,817 i6oooool $5,000 (30) 24 Maintenance Agreements i00006\u0026amp; XlOOOOOi JOOOOOix 25 Other xiocxxxx $13,548 lOOiio:xx $9,500 $10,475 i\u0026amp;'io\u0026amp;xx TOTAL (30) MATERIALS, 26 Principal's Office SUPPLIES 27 Regular Classroom (40) 28 Media CAPITAL OUTLAY (50) OTHER (60) 29 Other TOTAL (40) 30 Equipment 31 Building Repair, etc. 32 Other TOTAL (50) 33 Dues and Fees 34 Other iooooci\u0026amp; $94,163 .)000000(\" $98 .615 $80,686 xiooo:xx mii:ii. ~ XlOOOOO( ~ $44,436 ~ $34,900 $48,677 iOOOOO\u0026amp; .. ioooOOoc $5,380 ~ $4,800 iooooooc txiooiio\u0026amp; $2,624 xi\u0026amp;xio\u0026amp; $1,255 $3,218 )000000( xxxxxxx $52,440 ixxiocixx $40,955 $51,895 llOOOOOOI $12,832 ioooo\u0026amp;x $6,000 $15,651 xxxxxxx :\u0026amp;xi\u0026amp;xx ~ XlOOOOOi 1iioooo\u0026amp; iixiooooc ioooooci lOOOCiooi $12,832 lOOOOOO( $6,000 $15,651 1000000: lOOOOOOi ioo6oooi )000000( xiooixxx lociioo6i\" xxioooo( $9,500 $99.750 $42,155 $4,800 $1,000 $47,955 $6,000 $6,000 TOT AL (60) ioo66\u0026amp;x $0 ~ $0 $0 100\u0026amp;icix $0 TOTAL (3Q-Q0) ~ $159.435 xxiiioo\u0026amp; $145,570 $148,232 1io6:xioci $153,705 TOTAL(10-60) 62.5 $2,128,120 62.5 $2,160,646 $2,152,248 62.5 $2,235,393 TOTAL LINE ITEMS-(SECOND PAGE) ioo6oo\u0026amp; $59,394 ~ $113,512 $130,151 ~ $126,220 ~f~\n:~\n.ffe~tu\n.,:~i '.'.:\n:\n 1~::~~y\ny-~9~~: =~-: A~1~=:~ : , \\''~9~~~~ ~  Stipends $1 ,500 $2,550 Other Objects Indirect Costs $57,435 $109,849 $117,710 $122,557 Vocational $2,410 Athletics $4,094 Gifted Programs $155 $80 $155 Plant Services $2,505 $2,794 $2,505 Reading $84 $30 $84 Science English $251 $80 $251 Special Education $459 $668 $403 $668 XXXlOO( XXXlOO( XXXlOO( Total Line Items $59,394 $11 2,512 $130,151 $126,220 Per'Pupll:Cost'{Wtt =\\:W \\,\\1993-94/) ~:.,\n\u0026gt;1994-95:,,\n.:: ?i\\'.199~95f? ( h1995\n96 j:: 3rd Otr. ADM or Proi. 588.0 566.0 559.6 582.2 Total Costs $2,187,514 $2,274,158 $2,282,399 $2,361 ,614 PerPui,ilCostiMKHtWn. y:p\n#$3\n720.f Wli#W$'.4Jtts\n fWM+t\u0026lt;t'079( t/: '$4,056 ' 1995-96 BUDGET PROPO~ORAFJ.3) ..c: A\\ if 9l-94 .. 93-9\" 94-95 ... :_\n,: 94-95 .:.{ 94-95 .. , \" 95-96 95-96 Carve/Ma Qnet s~ ,~J\\~tlt~t@~?i\u0026amp;itrttttt/:: ::/.\n. ,.f..T.E. :,::,\n: .. Actual .\"' F.T.E. t\\ Budget #: ... ,\u0026gt;'Actual t\u0026gt; . F.T.E. '' B\\ldqet ... CERTIFIED 01 Principal 1.0 $67,263 1.0 $49,235 $49,673 1.0 $53,423 STAFF 02 Asst. Prin. 1.0 $41,640 1.0 $39,569 $39,816 1.0 $41 ,827 03 Specialists 8.0 $245,103 8.0 $259,133 $287,352 8.0 $258,643 04 Counselors 2.0 $45,473 2.0 $62,791 $63,337 2.0 $65,001 05 Media Soec. 1.5 $47,207 1.5 $48,443 $48,897 1.5 $50,145 06 Art-Perf./Prod. 07 Music 08 Foreion Lano. 09 Classroom 24 .3 $581 ,394 24.3 $690,567 $630,244 24.3 $685,053 10 Soecial Education 1.0 $33,001 1.0 $26,869 $45,076 1.5 $46,512 11 Gifted 1.4 $47,830 1.4 $45,303 $52,136 1.4 $46,862 12 Chapter 1 13 Substitutes $12,271 $17,150 $23,223 $17,150 14 Other-Kindergarten 4.0 $117.112 4.0 $120.344 $88,097 4.0 $124.713 TOTAL CERTIFIED SALARY 44.2 $1 ,238,294 44.2 $1 ,359.404 S1.327,849 44.7 $1,389,329 I SUPPORT 15 Secretaries 3.0 $60.742 3.0 S50.964 $47,887 3.0 $47,603 STAFF 16 Nurses 1.0 $31 ,556 1.0 S32,359 $31 ,806 1.0 $33.472 17 Custodians 4.0 $43,531 4.0 $41,956 $41,564 4.0 $37,592 18 Paraprofessionals-Chptr 1 19 Paraprofessionals-Other 20 Other-Aides 11.0 $75,921 11.0 S78,184 $89,247 11.0 $91 ,224 21 Fringe Benefits(20) xxmxx $171 ,444 xxxxxxx $191 ,607 $177,960 icxxxxxx $197,214 TOT Al SUPPORT SALARY 19.0 $383,194 19.0 $395,070 $388,465 19.0 $407,106 TOTAL (10-20) xmxxx $1 ,621,488 'lCXXXXXX $1 ,754,474 $1,716,314 xmxxx $1 ,796,435 PURCHASED 22 Utilities minx $66,973 filmx S75,965 $67,508 m:xxxx STT,413 SERVICES 23 Travel liicmxit $8,464 lmxxn $9.000 S7,524 xmxxx $9,000 (30) 24 Maintenance Agreements rimh ~ xxnxxx 25 Other wxix~ $13,840 fuilix $10.700 $14,292 xx:xxxxx $10,700 TOTAL (30) xfum $89,277 fuxxxx $95,665 $89,323 xxxxxxx S97,113 MATERIALS, 26 Principal's Office xxxxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxxxx SUPPLIES 27 Regular Classroom xxxxxxx $54,466 xxxxxxx $63,330 $66,365 xmxxx $63,330 (40) 28 Media xxxxnx $5,356 xxmoo: S11,500 $1,039 mxxxx $11,500 29 Other mxxxx $3,498 nmxx $3,500 $3,113 mxxx $3,500 TOTAL (40) i\u0026amp;mxx $63,320 xxfuri $78,330 $70,518 xmxxic $78,330 CAPITAL 30 Equipment i\u0026lt;xxilix $19,490 xhXlixx S19,000 S14,917 xroxxx S19,000 OUTLAY 31 BuildinQ Repair, etc. ~ J(XXXXXX xmxxx (50) 32 Other ~ ~ xxooxx TOTAL(50) xxxxxxx $19,490 fumx $19.000 $14,917 xmxxx $19,000 OTHER 33 Dues and Fees mxxxx $5,643 xxmxx $3.000 $6,495 xxxxxxx $3,000 (60) 34 Other xxxxxxx rxiium: xmxxx TOTAL (60) xxm:xx $5,643 .xmxxx $3,000 $6,495 xxxxxxx $3,000 TOT Al (30-60) ~ $177,730 ~ilixioc $195,995 $181,252 xxm.xx S197,443 TOTAL (10-60) 63.2 $1,799,218 63.2 $1 ,950,469 S1,897,567 63.7 $1,993,878 TOTAL LINE ITEMS-(SECOND PAGE) l6\u0026amp;xxxx $64,923 xxxxro S129,543 $145,549 ~ $128,244 nttMtGRAN0:J'..0TAtnn::::::t@ xxxxxx MMS1t864M1': xxxm :::: :\n$2\noao\n012 ttt2\n04:ims xxxxxx: f { $2\n122t122:: ~L@.t1~1Jj~:'.\n~:'.i1:~r ./i\\~:3u:kt /:}\n~9::n }:!''.~~~:~\u0026amp;@ w~=~g~~=~\u0026gt; Stipends $6,044 $13,100 $9,973 S13.100 OtherObiects Indirect Costs $58.412 $112,956 $125,067 $111 ,657 Vocational $2,561 Athletics $4,350 Gifted Proorams $145 $85 $145 Plant Services $2,385 $2,968 $2,385 Reading $82 $32 $82 Science English $239 $85 $239 Soecial Education $467 $636 $428 $636 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Total Line Items $64,923 $129,543 $145,549 $128,244 P.er:P..upltCosfJMWH%%) Sk1.993.94.M WJ9:94-9S\\W \\%1994-95@? i k199S,.9th? 3rd Qtr. ADM or Proi. 597.9 582.0 582.5 607.3 Total Costs $1,864,141 $2,080,012 $2,043,116 $2,122,122 Pif:P..ubilCostW#@l:@MH\\ @W@!$3}118 M'iMlS!,5741 HHtt$3\n501'. /f%=:tS3I494' 93.94 ,:: 93.94 .,,\\ :.94-95\n~95 ..   9'-95 :~5-96  .. 95-96 F.T.E.. \\t Actual ::'.X: -F..T.E.. :.. Budget.  ActuaF t\nF.T.E . ., .. Budget . CERTIFIED 01 Principal 1.0 $59,233 1.0 $44,496 $40,467 1.0 $46,100 STAFF 02 Asst Prin. 03 Specialists 1.0 1.0 $43,068 $65,021 1.0 $42,313 5.8 $127,098 5.8 $154,817 $164,180 5.8 $164,921 04 Counselors 1.0 $40,670 1.0 $40,670 $41,051 1.0 $41,861 05 Media Spec. 1.0 $38,684 1.0 $39,257 $39,625 1.0 $40,457 06 Art-Perf./Prod. 07 Music 08 ForoiQn Lang. 09 Classroom 15.0 $462,587 15.0 $433,026 $423,335 15.0 $437 ,493 10 Special Education 1.5 $70,319 1.5 $52,851 $71.708 1.5 $54,480 11 Gifted 1.0 $33,443 1.0 $34,246 $34,567 1.0 $35,377 12 Chapter 1 13 Substitutes $11,733 $14,000 $14,238 $14,000 14 Other-Kindergarten 2.0 $57,912 2.0 $59,580 $60,096 2.0 $61 ,759 TOTAL CERTIFIED SALARY 29 .3 $901 ,679 29.3 $916,011 $954,287 29.3 $938,761 1.4 $15,692 1.4 $18,779 $12,127 1.4 $18,906 0.8 $11 ,856 0.8 $12,446 $10,787 0.8 $12,968 I SUPPORT t--15-+-Se_cr_e_tan_ e_s _____ --+----------+------\"--+----+---.\n...._~ STAFF 16 Nurses PURCHASE SERVICES (30) MATERIALS, SUPPLIES (40) CAPITAL OUTLAY (50) OTHER (60) 17 Custodians 3.0 $39,012 3.0 18 Paraprofessionals-Chptr 1 19 Paraprofessionals-Other 20 Other-Aides 5.6 $33,307 5.6 21 FrinQe Benefits(20) !lOOOOOO( $114,688 lOC000CX TOTAL SUPPORT SALARY 10.8 $214,555 10.8 TOTAL (10-20) xioooo\u0026amp; $1,116,234 fuxxxx 22 Utilities :\u0026amp;icxicii $35,582 lioocxxxic 23 Travel XXlOOOO( IXlOOOOO( 24 Maintenance Agreements lxioooocx 25 Other lxiaxioa $6,591 lxioooooi TOTAL (30) $42,173 .XX)()(X)() 26 Principal's Office llOOOOOCX :oooccci 27 Regular Classroom liilOoo\u0026amp;x $20,882 xioix:ioo( 28 Media $3,934 OOlOOO 29 Other . xiooooii $1,397 x:coocxx TOTAL (40) ')()0000()' $26,213 xiooooo\u0026lt; 30 Equipment XlOOCXXX $1,312 xixxxxx 31 Building Repair, etc. fu:iixicx 32 Other )000000( l)O()OOO(X TOTAL (50) IJOOCcixlC $1,312 lx:coixxx 33 Dues and Fees I XlOOOOO( $215 llOOOOOO( 34 Other IXlOOOOOC lxxri:xloi TOTAL (60) lxxxxxxx $215 1xx:ccixic TOTAL (30-60) 1)00000()( $69,913 ~ TOTAL (10-60) 40.1 $1,186,147 40.1 TOTAL LINE ITEMS-(SECOND PAGE) lxioooooi $29,105 mxxxx j?/ : GRANOffOTAt:f) xxxxxx %$1\n215\n252 xxxxxx $39,803 $40,155 3.0 $41 ,024 $32,907 $26,814 5.6 $35,152 $123,740 $11Q ,391 IXXXXX)O( S127, 199 $227,675 $209,273 10.8 $235 ,248 $1,143,686 $1,163,560 xioooro $1 ,174,009 $41,385 $31,890 lOOOOOO( $42,263 $3,407 $1,479 lOC000CX $3,500 XlOOOOO( $4,000 $7,117 I~ $4,000 $48,792 $40,487 llOOOOCXX $49,763 1)000000( $25,068 $25,601 l'ii:iiiix $25,000 $6,600 $2,305 I ioiioooix $8,000 $2,455 $1,542 lioooooo $34,123 $29/1.9 !lOCCXXicx $33,000 $2,646 $12,842 .ii:iiiixxx,c $3,700 .~ ioo\u0026amp;xxx $2,646 $12,842 )00000()( $3,700 $1 ,155 $1,321 xxxxxxx $1 ,000 ~ $1,155 $1,321 15oo\u0026amp;x $1,000 $86,716 $84,098 li\u0026amp;iooiiix $87,463 $1,230,402 $1,247,658 40.1 $1,261,472 $57,993 $55,825 I~ $70,963 { $1\n288\n395:  '$.1\n'303\n433 xxxxxx ) $1\n332\n435 . =~~\n:t\n1:iEllt!~!:\n!\nl1~ mt~~~:!~mr t\u0026lt;~9~~:h~ Mi\n~~::\n~~F ~x\n~9~~~= t Stipends $0 Other Objects Indirect Costs $28,874 $56,089 $51,498 $69,059 Vocational $1,055 Athletics $1,791 Gifted PrOQrams $80 $35 $80 Plant Services $1,305 $1,222 $1,305 Reading $42 $13 $42 Science English $129 $35 $129 Special Education $231 $348 $176 $348 x:xxx:xx x:xxx:xx x:xxx:xx . Total Line Items $29,105 $57,993 $55,825 $70,963 Pit'ipjJpili(:ostJ@:@{Hf:m JM1993~/J %499~% #M9~9S}:l':: :ib'$99S:.9\u0026amp;\\( 3rd Qtr. ADM or Proj. 295.7 289.0 289.1 296.3 Total Costs $1 ,215,252 $1 ,288,395 $1 ,303,483 $1 ,332,435 Pei.PUmlCosh)%%W%9 +rnrr\" ~110: MCH$4\n'458' Mt#S-4\n509{ 5Yh $4\n497 ' 1995-96 BUDGET PROPOSAL(ORAFT.3) , 93-94 93-94   94-95 ., .. 9,4-95 .. : . 94-95 .. 95-96 . .'\\ 95-96 ., .. ,  Wlllla'ms Mai\nnet School }fr ' wt \\:.. '' , .f.T.E. ... ,, . . ,Actual F.T.E. ..: Budget .. Actual\\\\, F.T.E. \" Budget CERTIFIED 01 Principal 1.0 $65,081 1.0 $60,588 $60,896 1.0 $62,128 STAFF 02 Asst. Prin. 1.0 $38,931 1.0 $40,047 $40,205 1.0 $41 ,246 03 Specialists 5.0 $173,230 5.0 $182,894 $184,522 5.0 $188,658 04 Counselors 1.4 $45,279 1.4 $41 ,011 $41 ,395 1.4 $40,195 05 Media Spec. 1.0 $25,446 1.0 $28,846 $29,117 1.0 $30,706 06 Art-Pert JP rod. 07 Music 08 Foreiqn Lanq. 09 Classroom 20.0 $630,446 20.0 $660,714 $666,653 20.0 $685,214 10 Special Education 1.1 $25,764 1.1 $28,877 $29,147 1.1 $29,957 11 Gifted 2.0 $40,670 2.0 $72,728 $73,389 2.0 $75,030 12 Chapter 1 13 Substitutes $17,314 $16,000 $11,467 $16,000 14 Other-Kindergarten 3.0 $112,836 3.0 $113,639 $114,639 3.0 $117,134 TOTAL CERTIFIED SALARY 35.5 $1 ,174,997 35.5 $1 ,245,344 $1 ,251 ,430 35.5 $1,286,269 SUPPORT 15 Secretaries 2.6 $27 ,786 2.6 $41,377 $37,966 2.6 $40,728 STAFF 16 Nurses 1.0 $33,664 1.0 $35,551 $35,551 1.0 $36,694 17 Custodians 3.5 $44,866 3.5 $46,660 $46,384 4.0 $47 ,837 18 Paraprofessionals-Chptr 1 19 Paraprofessionals-Other 20 OlherAides 9.0 $37,175 9.0 $44,618 $38,036 9.0 $44,948 21 Fringe Benefits(20) iooo(xxx $147,956 ~ $166,961 $156,998 ~ $172,638 TOTAL SUPPORT SALARY 16.1 $291,447 16.1 $335,167 $314,935 16.6 $342,845 TOTAL (1020) xxxxxxx $1,466,444 ~ $1,580,511 $1 ,566,365 )OO(XXXX $1 ,629,113 PURCHASE 22 Utilities ~ $44,468 ii:ii:i:I. $57,280 $39,636 1xioooocx $59,353 SERVICES 23 Travel ~ $4,601 XXXlOOQ( $5,000 $558 'xxt:t:t:XX $5,000 (30) 24 Maintenance Agreements xxxxxxx ~ 'wim 25 Other ~ $9,938 I~ $8,000 $13,763 ioo\u0026amp;xxx $8,000 TOTAL (30) lx:i\u0026amp;looo: $59,007 ~ $70,280 $53,957 x:i066ooc $72,353 MATERIALS, 26 Principal's Office ioiiooiio( xi:iixit. i!i:iixix SUPPLIES 27 Reqular Classroom ~ $55 ,228 ~ $31 ,698 $54,558 XlOOOOO( $39,700 (40) 28 Media i\u0026amp;mi:x $4,645 I~ $11,000 $4,034 )OCJOOO(X $10,000 29 Other ~ $2,095 xx:xxxxx $2,200 $1,713 itxd:fu. $2,300 TOTAL (40) ioixio:xx $61 ,968 ~ $44,898 $60,306 'Xiiim. S52,000 CAPITAL 30 Equipment xxxxxxx $6,799 ~ $22,700 $15,921 l'mYYY:) $15,598 OUTLAY 31 Building Repair, etc. ~ i\u0026amp;:\u0026amp;iooi :i:x:\u0026amp;xxx (50) 32 Other m:i:i:ri 'Xiii:l:t::t. ~ TOTAL (50) liiooaxx $6,799 ~ $22,700 $15,921 x:ioo'.:oo'. $15,598 OTHER 33 Dues and Fees )0()(')000( $720 xxri:xxx $2,000 $1,544 ~ $2,000 (60) 34 Other x:cixxxx IXJ0006o: ~ TOTAL(60) lOOOOOO( $720 xxxxxxx $2,000 $1,544 Xl'6o6o\u0026amp; $2,000 TOTAL (30-60) I~ $128,494 I lOOClOOOC $139,878 $131,729 xxnix:x $141,951 TOTAL (10-60) 51.6 $1,594,938 51.6 $1,720,389 $1 ,698,093 52.1 $1 ,771 ,064 TOTAL LINE ITEMS(SECOND PAGE) ldooooo( $49,480 lxmxioi: $103,657 $106,906 i\u0026amp;xxxxx $110,833 tt#3RANDTOIALJ/J{: xxxxxx )}$1\n'644\n418: xxxxxx Ft$1'\n824i-046\\ tts.1\nMs\nooo::: xxxxxx .m: su111\ncsrrr :)Actual)} f?BudQet+ \u0026gt;J.. ctual\\W \\YBudgel'\"'\"\"- 1993-94 1994-95 1994-95 1995-96 Stipends $1 ,676 $10,000 $3,232 $10,000 Other Objects Indirect Costs $47,427 $90,829 $95 ,639 $98,005 Vocational $1 ,958 Athletics $3,326 Gifted Programs $120 $65 $120 Plant Services $1 ,935 $2,270 $1 ,935 Reading $63 $24 $63 Science English $194 $65 $194 Special Education $377 $516 $327 $516 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Total Line Items $49,480 $103,657 $106,906 $110,833 fl\"ef'.Plipii:eostmrnnwmw1 tM$93\n.94:mf tWf9$'4\n_95M WM!l9+.:95iW lJAoo5\n96lt 3rd Qtr. ADM or Proj. 485.8 468.0 449.8 484.7 Total Costs $1 ,644,418 $1 ,824,046 $1,SD5,000 $1 ,881 ,897 P.er'Piilil-OostNWWW%t)\nwm$3\n385t %t@1$3\n-S91!i V@,- S4\n01a =A6l$3)88:r 93-94 . 94-95 .. }/:.94-95 , .. ,:, 94-95 .,. 95-96 95-96 .:. Acttral , f.T.E.  .Budget , 'Actual =:.  f.T.E. ,,:= Budger:-,t CERTIFIED 01 Principal 1.0 $64,520 1.0 $64,256 $64,646 1.0 $65,818 STAFF 02 Asst. Prin. 3.0 $148,979 3.0 $145,767 $146,643 3.0 $144,212 03 Specialists 3.6 $111 ,283 3.6 $113 ,157 $102,932 3.6 $104,130 04 Counselors 3.0 $69,852 3.0 $111 ,241 $74 ,142 3.0 $114 ,903 05 Media Spec. 1.0 $41.729 1.0 $41 ,729 $42,120 1.0 $42,951 06 Art-Perf./Prod. 07 Music 08 Foreign Lang. 09 Vocational 5.6 $207,954 5.6 $190,845 $192,183 5.6 $213,657 10 Special Education 1.3 $49,016 1.3 $50,084 $50,553 1.3 $51 ,631 11 Gifted 12 Classroom 46.8 $1 ,424,850 46.8 $1 ,443,934 $1,464,542 46.8 $1 ,481 ,399 13 Substitutes $71 ,832 $36,135 $36,319 $36,200 14 Other TOTAL CERTIFIED SALARY 65.3 $2,190,015 65.3 $2,197,148 $2,174,079 65.3 $2,254 ,901 SUPPORT 15 Secretaries 4.0 $66,063 4.0 $68,494 $68,815 5.0 $80,258 STAFF 16 Nurses 1.0 $32,359 1.0 $32,359 $32,359 1.0 $33,472 17 Custodians 6.0 $68,890 6.0 $60,373 $66,778 6.0 $71 ,548 18 Paraprofessionals-Chptr 1 19 Paraprofessionals-Other 1.0 $24,845 1.0 $23,937 $33,357 1.0 $31,293 20 Other-Aides 2.4 $42,951 2.4 $28,101 $33,285 2.4 $28,900 21 Fringe Benefits(20) $266,922 XlOOOOO( $275,254 $263 ,037 lOOOOOO( $286 ,1 01 TOTAL SUPPORT SALARY 14.4 $502,030 14.4 $488,518 $497,631 15.4 $531 ,573 TOTAL (10-20) 1)000000( $2,692,045 ~ $2,685,666 $2,671.710 mxm. $2,786,474 P~:~~!\nD~~:\n~~::1:~::is~===========\n:~-~~:~::~=~~::=~~~~~~=~~~=~~==~:~~~:~~::==~~1 $162,874 xxio:io\u0026amp; $177,221 $155,343 iXXlOOO(X $178 ,303 $1 ,266 xxxxxxx $10,000 $10,011 )(XXXXXX $10,000 (30) 24 Maintenance Agreements :xxxioooi 25 Other )OOO(X)OC TOTAL (30) MATERIALS, 26 Principal's Office SUPPLIES 27 Regular Classroom (40) 28 Media CAPITAL OUTLAY (50) 29 Other TOTAL (40) 30 Equipment 31 Building Repair, etc. 32 Other TOTAL (50) 33 Dues and Fees ioooixloc tii\nim. i\u0026amp;:ttccx 1)()00000( liiix:nx liooociciix liooooocx mxxl6I xioooocii )000000( lOOCCXXl( $34,819 $198,959 $79,331 $9,547 $2,923 $91,801 $15,510 $15,510 $1,764 ioociooo( )000()00( XXXlOOO( $27,300 $45,210 lOOOOOO( ~ $214,521 $210,564 )000()00( XlOOCioi:x ~ xxmo:x $49,168 $81,026 lO:XXXXX JOO( $15,700 $9,486 )000000( i\u0026amp;mxx $4,000 $2,421 xxxxxxx mo\u0026amp;xx $68,868 ~92,933 ~ )000000( $27,300 $37,285 ioooiioo( xxiii6o\u0026amp; oooo\u0026amp;xx xi06oo6c ~ xiooo6cx' $27,300 $37,285 ocioooooc OTHER xxioooot $4,500 $1,104 xxxxxxx (60) 34 Other XlOOOOO( JOOOOOO( JOOOOOO( $44,300 $232 ,603 $64,168 $15,700 $4,000 $83 ,868 $27,300 $27,300 $4,500 TOTAL (60) 'iiii:m. $1 ,764 xxi\u0026amp;iooi $4,500 $1,104 ~ $4,500 TOTAL (30-60) ioooooix $308,034 rixxloQc $315,189 $341,886 ~ $348 ,271 TOTAL (10-60) 79.7 $3,000,079 79.7 $3,000,855 $3,013,596 80.7 $3,134.745 TOTAL LINE ITEMS-(SECOND PAGE) llOOOOCXX $109,678 ~ $201,987 $191,880 XiOO:i\u0026amp;x $210,724 l/t i\\GRANDT.OTAldltt} rixrix \\ $3~109,757 iixxxi \\ $3\n202\n842, ,t:$3\n205,476 mrix D S3!345\n469 ~11i.\n1lil f1l~!l!iil~[\n~1li\ni!i M~:~~\n th ~s~it t~1~::::rn \u0026gt;~9~~~ Stipends $4,530 $4,600 $480 $4,600 Other Objects Indirect Costs $80,835 $162,057 $176,565 $170,794 Vocational $8,890 $16,000 $3,616 $16,000 Athletics $14,777 $14,500 $6,140 $14,500 Gifted Programs $118 Plant Services $3,450 $4,190 $3,450 Reading $115 $46 $115 Science En!llish $345 $120 $345 Special Education $646 $920 $605 $920 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Total Line Items $109,678 $201 ,987 $191 ,880 $210,724 3rd Qtr. ADM or Proj. 827.8 835.0 842.8 836.7 Total Costs $3,109,757 $3,202,842 $3,205,476 $3,345,469 1995-96 BUDGHPROPOSAL(DRAfT3)   93-94 93.9,4 94-95 94-95 :, , .. 94-95 ,: . 95-96 95-96 Paric~w M~gn~ts~hool  \nih,%Mg, ,., ) F.T.E Actual .. : f.T.E. . .. Blldgett\n .//Actualt\\ .f.T.E. Bud,iet CERTIFIED 01 Principal 1.0 $64,582 1.0 $65.747 $66,148 1.0 $67 ,321 STAFF 02 Asst Prin. 3.0 $152,394 3.0 $153,428 $154 354 3.0 $157 ,476 03 Specialists 9.8 $301 ,371 9.8 $266,815 $306,485 9.8 $298,029 04 Counselors 3.0 $124,940 3.0 $129 ,841 $130,987 3.0 $133 ,755 05 Media Spec. 1.0 $34,026 1.0 $34,026 $34,345 1.0 $35,176 06 Art-Perf./Prod. 07 Music 08 Forei,in Lang. 09 Vocational 7.0 $276,023 7.0 $214,076 $216,610 7.0 $211,989 10 Special Education 1.5 $53,457 1.5 $53,457 $54,861 1.5 $54,737 11 Gifted 12 Classroom 39.6 $1,371,266 39.6 $1 ,416,539 $1 ,394,739 40.6 $1,410,368 13 Substitutes $45,634 $51,640 $31 ,172 $51,640 14 Other-Kindergarten 1.0 $40,670 1.0 $40,670 $41,051 1.0 $41 ,861 TOTAL CERTIFIED SALARY 66.9 $2,464,363 66.9 $2,426,239 $2,430,752 67.9 $2,462,351 SUPPORT 15 Secretaries 6.0 $143 ,706 6.0 $111 ,962 $132,489 6.0 $113,383 STAFF 16 Nurses 0.6 $19,416 0.6 $14,453 $14,453 0.6 $15,075 17 Custodians 8.0 $120,368 8.0 $115,043 $105,710 8.0 $115,308 18 Paraprofessionals-Chptr 1 19 Paraprofessionals-Other 5.0 $97,365 5.0 $108,916 $97,429 5.0 $110,898 20 Other-Aides 2.0 $11,308 2.0 $23,616 $26,003 2.0 $24,286 21 Fringe Benefits(20) ix:io:iooi $313 ,946 )00()000( $315,107 $303,948 ~ $321,347 TOTAL SUPPORT SALARY 21.6 $706,109 21.6 $689,097 $680,032 21 .6 $700,297 TOTAL (10-20) xxxxiboi $3,170,472 ~ $3 ,115,336 $3,110,784 'iiiim. $3 ,162,648 PURCHASED 22 Utilities xxxioOoc $213,303 XlOOOOO( $183,100 $168,431 ~ $183,753 SERVICES 23 Travel 1000000( $1,310 xri:x:iooc $1 ,500 $5.259 riioooo: $6,000 (30) 24 Maintenance Agreements ~ )0,00()()0( .......... )0000()()( 25 Other !000000( $40,933 xxxxxxx $14,750 $34,459 XXXXXlO: $27,000 TOTAL (30) ixxio:xx $255,546 xxxim. $199,350 $208,148 'XXXXXXY- $216,753 MATERIALS, 26 Principal's Office xxixxx1. )()()00()()( )()()()()00( SUPPLIES 27 Regular Classroom ioooo\u0026amp;x $74,513 )'.X)QOOO( $98,173 $77,470 xmxxx $101 ,065 (40) 28 Media ~ $5,415 )000000( $7,642 $21,359 )000000( $7,100 29 Other XX)QOO(X $6,336 XlOOOOO( $6 ,100 $5,574 xxioo:xx $6,000 TOTAL (40) l005oooc $86,264 XlOOOOO( $111,915 $104,403 IXlOO:XXX $114,165 CAPITAL 30 Equipment mxxxx $11,086 ~ $16,000 $25,924 )00000()( $15,000 OUTLAY 31 Building Repair, etc. iOO()OOO( ~ \u0026gt;::xXXXXX (50) 32 Other xxxxioi:x XXXXXX'X ~ TOTAL (50) xmiooc $11,086 xxioocxx $16,000 $25,924 rii\u0026amp;iooc $15,000 OTHER 33 Dues and Fees xioooocx $4,675 ro:xxfu: $5,000 $3,511 ~ $4,000 (60) 34 Other io655\u0026amp;ii: iii::iixx. JOOO()()(X TOTAL (60) xxxioooc $4,675 xxxxxxx $5,000 $3,511 XXXlOOO( $4,000 TOTAL (30-60) xioooooc $357,571 iiixi:iY. $332,265 $341,987 ~ $349,918 TOTAL (10-60) 88.5 $3,528,043 88.5 $3,447,601 $3,452,m 89.5 $3,512,566 TOTAL LINE ITEMS-(SECOND PAGE) JOOOOOO( $101,049 m:xio:x $190,036 $185,785 lxxxili\u0026amp; $232,152 t ?GRANDTOTAIJ/ lit:: rifux t?S3\n629,'IHIV mm: M\\$3\n637{637:' tt$3)638\n55!t miix\n)$3\n744\n718 I Unelteni CostsWt,Ytt :/@Actuil ::'ik ?}Budget\u0026lt;? :\n:_\nActual .. ) ti Budget// ''''''\"'='':s:,,\n,,,,,,,,c:\n:c,,,:c., .. , 1993-94 1994-95 1994-95 1995-96 Stipends $2,519 $1,425 $2,359 $1 ,425 Other Objects Indirect Costs $75,743 $153,323 $169,208 $192,439 Vocational $8,332 $16,000 $3,465 $16,000 Athletics $13,850 $14,500 $5,885 $17,500 Gifted Programs $115 Plant Services $3,420 $4,016 $3,420 Reading $114 $43 $114 Science English $342 $115 $342 Special Educafion $605 $912 $579 $912 )00000( )00000( )00000( Total Line Items $101,049 $190,036 $185,785 $232,152 3rd Qtr. ADM or Proi. 775.3 790.0 799.0 832.3 Total Costs $3,629,092 $3,637,637 $3,638,556 $3,744,718 .... )I, - Magnet Review Committee 1900 North Main Street  Suite 101 North Little Rock, Arkansas 72114 Donna Grady Creer Executive Director March 6, 1996 The Honorable Susan Webber Wright Judge, U.S. District Court Eastern District of Arkansas 600 West Capitol Suite 302 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Judge Wright: (501 ) 758-0156 --  In a letter dated June 26, 1995, the Magnet Review Committee submitted the 1995-96 interdistrict magnet schools budget (labeled Draft 2) in the amount of $14,614,360 for your approval. The total amount budgeted was based on a per-pupil expenditure of $4, 140 per student and a projected third-quarter enrollment of 3,530 students. This budget showed an increase of $87 .00 per student over the 1994-95 budget. Since that time, the budget has been revised to better reflect the current status of magnets, taking salaries into account which reflect the results of finalized contract negotiations and an increased number of students. These factors have resulted in an adjustment from $4,140 per-pupil expenditure to $4,063 per pupil, a decrease of $77 .00 per student from the budget (Draft 2) submitted to you on June 26, 1995, or an increase of $10.00 per student over the 1994-95 budget. The total revised budget amount for the 1995-96 magnet schools budget is now $14,788,255. The Magnet Review Committee approved this revised budget (Draft 3) during its regular meeting on February 27, 1996. To date, a response has not been received from the Court with regard to the budget previously submitted. Since we are now well into the 1995-96 school year, and the State of Arkansas cannot release additional funds for per-pupil expenditure without Court-ordered approval !in this case, it is $10.00 per student over the 1994-95 budget), the Magnet Review Committee is respectfully requesting your approval of the revised 1995-96 interdistrict magnet schools budget. The Magnet Review Committee is committed to maintaining the existing quality of the interdistrict magnet schools. One of our primary goals is to ensure efficient and effective cost containment while continuing to deliver attractive instructional .. -' . - The Honorable Susan Webber Wright -2- March 6, 1996 programs. We will continue to work with the host district as we exercise prudent oversight of the magnet schools' budget. Thank you for your consideration and response to this important matter. Sincerely, 61~ Dr. Bobby Altom, Chairperson Magnet Review Committee Attachment: 1995-96 lnterdistrict Magnet Schools Budget !Approved Draft 3) cc: Ann Brown, Federal Monitor - ODM ' 1995-96 BUDGET PROPOSAL(ORAFT 3) 93-!M 93-94 94-95 94-95 94-95 95-96 95-96 SUMMARY FOR MAGNET SCHOOLS :: F.T.E. Actual . F.T.E. Budget .t,ctual F.T.E. Budget CERTIFIED 01 Principal 6.0 $375,279 6.0 $340,086 $337,925 6.0 $352,057 STAFF 02 Asst. Prin. 10.0 $433,972 10.0 $473,907 $498,372 10.0 $464,082 03 Specialists 39.2 $1 ,211,895 39.2 $1 ,224,208 $1 ,262,967 39.2 $1 ,266,519 04 Counselors 12.4 $405,435 12.4 $452,360 $418,344 12.4 $465 ,882 05 Media Spec. 6.5 $224,104 6.5 $230,137 $232,294 6.5 $238,456 06 Art-Perf./Prod. 0.0 so 0.0 $0 0.0 07 Music 0.0 $0 0.0 $0 0.0 08 ForeiQn LanQ. 0.0 $0 0.0 $0 0.0 09 Vocational 12.6 $483,977 12.6 $404,921 $408.793 12.6 $425,646 10 Special Education 7.7 $282,681 7.7 $263,527 $303.215 8.2 $290,265 11 Gifted 5.4 $158 ,016 5.4 $189,153 $197 ,313 54 $195,300 12 Classroom 175.9 $5,377,867 175.9 S5,582,r5 ~5.544,709 176.9 $5,692,303 13 Substitutes 0.0 $182,975 0.0 $154,925 $141 ,654 0.0 $154 ,990 14 Other-Kindergarten 14.0 $448,552 14.0 $459,595 $430,419 14.0 $473,402 TOTAL CERTIFIED SALARY 289.7 $9,584,753 289.7 $9,775,094 $9 ,776,005 291 .2 $10,018,902 ! SUPPORT 15 Secretaries 19.0 $360,333 19.0 $323,508 $331 ,216 20.0 5333,302 STAFF 16 Nurses 5.4 $156,152 5.4 $155,272 $153,060 5.4 $160,858 17 Custodians 28.5 $360,957 28.5 $355,219 $351 ,307 29 .0 $365,905 18 Paraprofessionals-Chptr 1 0.0 $0 0.0 $0 0.0 19 Paraprofessionals-Other 6.0 $122,210 6.0 $132,853 $130,786 6.0 $142,191 20 Other-Aides 37.0 $237,662 37.0 $270.749 $269,245 37.0 $288,560 21 Fringe Benefits(20) 'm:mi, $1 ,213,301 XXXlOOO( $1 ,282,054 $1,221 ,134 )0()()()00( $1 ,320,650 TOTAL SUPPORT SALARY 95.9 $2,450,615 95.9 $2,519,655 $?,456.748 97.4 $2.611 ,466 TOTAL (10-20) XlOOCOO( $12,035,368 lOOOOOOC $12,294,, ,i9 ~ i 2,232.753 XlOOOOC( $12,630,368 PURCHASED 22 Utilities  )()()()000( $598,876 xxiooo\u0026lt;x $619,066 $529 ,201 )0()()()00( $626,335 SERVICES 23 Travel xxxxxxx $20,580 xxxxxxi\u0026lt; $33 ,907 $28,648 XlOOOOO( $38,500 (30) 24 Maintenance AQreements xi\u0026lt;XXXl6( oooooiio: xx:xxxxx 25 Other x:iii:iix $119,669 XlOOOOO( $74,250 $125,316 lOOOOOO( $103 ,500 TOTAL (30) xxxxxxx $739,125 iccixxxx $727,223 $683,165 xxxxxxx $768,335 MATERIALS, 26 Principafs Office ~ xxxxm xxxxxxx SUPPLIES 27 Regular Classroom xxiolxxx $328,856 'lxi:txi:J. $302,337 $353,700 IJOO\u0026lt;XXXX $335,418 (40) 28 Media XlOOCOO( $34,277 rxiiioixxic $57,242 $38 ,223 fJOOOOOC( $57,100 29 Other xi\u0026amp;\ni\u0026amp;io\" $18,873 XlOOOOOt $19,510 $17,581 ioOoooo( $16,800 TOTAL (40) xxxxxxx $382,006 ioooocxx $379,089 $409,504 xxxxxxx $409,318 CAPITAL 30 Equipment XXIOOOO( $67,029 lOOOOOO( $93,646 $122,540 xxxioOOt: $86,598 OUTLAY 31 Building Repair, etc. ~ iX)OOOOO( XlOOOOO( (50) 32 Other ri::iim. i\u0026amp;xiixxx XXXXlO(X TOTAL (50) ~ $67,029 lOOOO(XX $93,646 $122,540 xiooooix $86,598 OTHER 33 Dues and Fees )000000( $13,017 xiciicioo\u0026lt; $15,655 $13,975 lOOOOCXX $14,500 (60) 34 Other XXXXXlO( iiloooooc iiiiiiioocic TOTAL (60) I~ $13,017 xxxxxxx $15,655 $13,975 xioooooc $14,500 TOTAL (30-60) i6ooo6:x $1,201,177 wxxxx $1 ,215,613 $1,229,184 lOOOOO(X $1,278,751 TOTAL (10-60) 385.6 $13,236,545 385.6 $13,510,362 $13,461 ,937 388.6 $13,909,119 TOTAL LINE ITEMS - (SECOND PAGE) i66ooo\u0026amp; $413,629 XlOOOOO( $796,728 $816,097 xxiixxlci $879,136 \n:::\\lGRANOJOTAt/t:i/f xxxxxx t/'$:13\n650\n17 4 rirox i\nji'.$14,307\n!90 :}J~4\n278\nD30  xxxxxx t 414,7B8,255 ) un.tterrtcosts:@ttititt 416\\etual/( )/Budget(}, \u0026gt;lAettiat%M= :,ttBildget.4? .. :a::: S:\n::'NMH 1993-94 1994-95 1994-95 1995-96 Stipends $16,269 $29,125 $18,594 $29,125 Other Objects Indirect Costs $348,726 $685,103 $735,687 $764,511 Vocational $17,222 $32,000 $15,065 $32,000 Athletics $28,627 $29,000 $25,586 $32,000 Gifted Programs $500 $498 $500 Plant Services $15,000 $17,460 $15,000 ReedinQ $500 $168 $500 Science English $1 ,500 $500 $1,500 Special Education $2,785 $4,000 $2,518 $4,000 lOOOOO( lOOOOO( lOOOOO( Total Line Items $413 ,629 $796,728 $816,097 $879,136 PeiP.upllCocttW@Mllfrfa KH199U4tt /i\\\n1994,:95\n:1. :\n\\,IJ99US.-/\\ M?t995-9o\\i'/ 3rd Qtr. ADM or Proj. 3570.5 3530.0 3522.8 3639.7 Total Costs $13,650,174 $14,307 ,090 $14,278,030 $14,788,255 P.'1i'PtfoifCostMJftii@M: tNFit=l3\n823 ?/')''{:$4\n-053' ':)tH:%'$4\n053': ::t:$4\n003:' --- 1995-96 BUDGET PROPOSAL(DRAFT 3} 93-94 93-94 94-95 , 94-95 94-95 95-96 1995-96 Booker Magnet School ,C. . F.T.E.  Actual F.T.E:, Budoet Actual F.T.E. Budget CERTIFIED 01 Principal 1.0 $54,600 1.0 $55.764 $56,095 1.0 S57,267 STAFF 02 Asst. Prin. 1.0 $52,028 1.0 $52,028 $52,333 1.0 $37,008 03 Specialists 7.0 $253,810 7.0 $247,392 $217,496 7.0 $252,138 04 Counselors 2.0 $79,221 2.0 $66,806 $67,432 2.0 $70,167 05 Media Spec. 1.0 $37 ,012 1.0 $37,836 $38.190 1.0 $39,021 06 Art-Perf./Prod. 07 Music 08 Foreign Lang. 09 Classroom 30.2 $907 ,324 30.2 $937,495 $965,196 30.2 $992,776 10 Special Education 1.3 $51 ,124 1.3 $51 ,389 $51 ,870 1.3 S52.948 11 Gifted 1.0 $36,073 1.0 $36,876 $37,221 1.0 S38,031 12 Chapter 1 13 Substitutes $24,191 $20,000 $25,235 $20,000 14 Other-Kindergarten 4.0 $120,022 4.0 $125,362 $126,536 4.0 $127 ,935 TOTAL CERTIFIED SALARY 48.5 $1,615,405 48.5 $1 ,630,948 $1 ,637 ,605 48.5 $1 ,687,291 SUPPORT 15 Secretaries 2.0 $46,344 2.0 $31 ,932 $31,932 2.0 $32,424 STAFF 16 Nurses 1.0 $27 ,301 1.0 $28 .104 $28 ,104 1.0 $29,177 17 Custodians 4.0 $44,290 4.0 $51,384 $50,716 4.0 S52,596 18 Paraprofessionals-Chptr 1 19 Paraprofess:onals-Other 20 Other-Aides 7.0 $37,000 7.0 $63,323 $55 ,860 7.0 $64,050 21 Fringe Benefits(20) XXlOOOOC $198,345 IXloooixx $209,385 $199,799 lOOOOOCX $216,151 TOTAL SUPPORT SALARY 14.0 $353,280 14.0 $384 ,128 $366,411 14.0 $394,398 TOTAL (10-20) xxxxxxx $1,968,685 xxxxxxx $2,015,076 $2,004,016 xxxxxxx $2,081,688 PURCHASED 22 Utilities .lOOOOOO( $75,676 JOOCXXXl( $84,115 $66,393 :JOOOOOOi $85,250 SERVICES 23 Travel lOOOOOO( $4,939 [XXlOOOO( $5,000 $3,817 lOOOOOOI $5,000 (30) 24 Maintenance Agreements iooooOOc XlOOCi\u0026amp;x xxxiixxx 25 Other ioo6oc\u0026amp; $13,548 )000:)00( $9,500 $10,475 XlOO\u0026lt;XXX $9,500 TOTAL (30) 'XXXXlOO( $94,163 I )()00000( $98 615 $80,686 XlOO\u0026lt;XXX $99 ,750 MATERIALS, 26 Prindpal's Office riiiJ::ix ~ lOOOOOCX SUPPLIES 27 Regular Classroom ioooooo( $44,436 lOOOOO\u0026amp; $34,900 $48,677 )0()0000( $42,155 (40) 28 Media ~ $5,380 I~ $4,800 xxxxxxx $4,800 29 Other iooooixx $2,624 iJOOOi:iol:x $1 ,255 $3,218 :JOOOOOOi $1,000 TOTAL (40) XJOOOOO( $52,440 xxicioooc $40,955 $51,895 ~ $47,955 CAPITAL 30 Equipment ~ $12,832 xiiioooo\u0026lt; $6,000 $15 ,651 xxxxxxx $6,000 OUTLAY 31 Building Repair, etc. XXXlOOO( xxxx:i XlOOOO()( (50) 32 Other ixxxxio\nlxxio6ooc XlOO\u0026lt;XXX TOTAL (50) XXlOOOO( $12,832 Xl()()OO(X $6,000 $15 ,651 '1000000I $6,000 OTHER 33 Dues and Fees lOOOOOO( ioooooot xxxiooo: (60) 34 Other i5\u0026amp;xxioi lxioooooc XXlOOOOI TOTAL(60) ~ $0 b6iiiJciooc $0 $0 'XXXXioix $0 TOTAL (30-60) ,ooooiiix $159,435 xxiooooc $145,570 $148 ,232 lOO(XXXX $153,705 TOTAL (10-60) 62.5 $2,128,120 62.5 $2,160,646 $2,152,248 62.5 $2,235,393 TOTAL LINE ITEMS-(SECOND PAGE) xxxxxxx $59,394 boooooo\u0026lt; $113,512 $130,151 xxxxxxx $126,220 : ?'ltGRANDTOTALY J?= rixxxi )/$2\n1 B7\n5u:. xxxxxi \\LSU74J58' C\\ $2\n282\n399, u:ri:i:i.- \\ $2,361\n614 Lint lttmCosls'' .. ,,,,,,,.,r,. :,:\\}Actual :f\\ )t/Bildgat\\i/, '}Actual ?''\\  :?Budget'\u0026gt;\n,:Lt:::::x\nJ~\n:\n1::\n,t\n:j:::f't~ 1993.94 1994-95 1994-95 1995-96 Stipends $1,500 $2,550 Other Obiecis Indirect Costs $57,435 $109 ,849 $117,710 $122,557 Vocational $2,410 Athletics $4,094 Gifted Programs $155 $80 $155 Plant Services $2,505 $2,794 $2,505 Reading $84 $30 $84 Science English $251 $80 $251 Special Education $459 $668 $403 $668 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Total line Items $59,394 $112 512 $130,151 $126,220 PerPupilCost'tl!A',+ (: .f/'199~94 % WPt994:-95'i:U :\"::1994-9.5\\k :): 1995..96 . 3rd Qtr. ADM or Proj. 588.0 566.0 559.6 582.2 Total Costs $2,187,514 $2,274,158 $2,282,399 $2,361 ,614 Per'Pup1(Ci:m%lAMMM :YWWt'$3mo. tt!:d:::$4Jtts ':':HitM$.4\nwg,: i:,:\n::s4,056 1995-96 BUDGET PROPOSAL{0RAFT.3)   CarverMaqnetSc:hool .:,c\n:\n:.:\n::, . -\u0026lt; ,,,)fa\u0026lt;\n/ }{ CERTIFIED 01 Principal STAFF 02 Asst. Prin. 03 Specialists 04 Counselors 05 Media Spec. 06 Art-Perf./Prod. 07 Music 08 Foreign Lanq. 09 Classroom 10 Soecial Education 11 Gifted 12 Chapter 1 13 Substitutes 14 Other-Kindergarten TOTAL CERTIFIED SALARY 15 Secretaries 16 Nurses 17 Custodians 18 Paraprofessionals-Chptr 1 19 Paraprofessionals-Other 93-94 F..T.E. 1.0 1.0 8.0 2.0 1.5 24.3 1.0 1.4 4.0 44.2 3.0 1.0 4.0 93-94 Actual\u0026gt; $67,263 $41,640 $245.103 $45.473 $47,207 94-95 F.T.E. 1.0 1.0 8.0 2.0 1.5 $581,394 24.3 $33,001 1.0 $47,830 1.4 $12,271 $117.112 4.0 $1 ,238,294 44.2 S60,742 3.0 S31 ,556 1.0 $43,531 4.0 Budget   $49,235 $39 .569 S259.133 S62.791 $48,443 $690,567 $26,869 $45,303 S17, 150 S12C:-i.44 S1,359.404 SS0,964 S32,359 $41,956 94-95 .Actual ''' $49,673 $39,816 $287,352 $63,337 $48,897 95-% F.T.E. 1.0 1.0 8.0 2.0 1.5 $630,244 24.3 $45,076 1.5 $52,136 1.4 $23,223 $88,097 4.0 S1,327,849 44.7 $47,887 3.0 $31 ,806 1.0 $41,564 4.0 95-% Budoet $53.423 $41,827 $258,643 S65,001 $50.145 $685,053 $46,512 $46,862 $17,150 S124.713 S1,389.329 $47,603 S33.472 S37,592 20 Other-Aides 11.0 $75,921 11.0 $78,184 S89,247 11.0 $91 ,224 21 Fringe Benefits(20) xxxxxxx $171,444 xxxxxxx $191,607 $177,960 xxxxxxx S197,214 TOT AL SUPPORT SALARY 19.0 S383, 194 19.0 $395,070 S388.465 19.0 S407, 105 TOTAL (10.20) xxxxxxx $1,621.488 xxxxxxx $1.754.474 $1.716,314 xxxxxxx $1,796.435 PURCHASED~2_2-Uti_.li_tie_s ______x xxxx__x_x __S6_ 6.\n...,9_73-+-nxxn:1._-.-+ __S_ 75_,9_6_5+-__S6 _7~,5_08-t-xxxx_x xx __S TT~.4_1_3 SERVICES f-2_3-+-Tr_av_e_l -------+-xxxxx-x.. .,.,_x+--__S _B.\n....4_64-+-IXXXXJOO__-+-__S9 .0_0_0+ --__S _7~,5_24-+-)00()(l(--Xx-+-__S9. ..\n.,0_0---i0 (30) 24 Maintenance Agreements xxnxxx ifrt:m. xxxxxxx 25 Other l\u0026amp;i\u0026amp;xxx S13,840 nJOOooC S10.700 S14,292 xxxxxxx TOTAL (30) xxxxxxx S89,277 xxxxxxx S95,665 $89,323 xxxxxxx MATERIALS, 26 Principal's Office xxxxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxxxx SUPPLIES 27 Regular Classroom xxxxxxx $54,466 xxxxxxx S63.330 S66,365 xxxxxxx (40) 28 Media riixfoc $5,356 J()(XlOOO( S11,500 $1,039 xxxx'xicx CAPITAL OUTLAY (50) OTHER (60) 29 Other ilifuic $3,498 rilOOOOI S3.500 $3,113 iirixicicx TOTAL (40) ~xx S53,320 xxxxm: S78.330 s10.s1a xxxxxxx 30 Equipment xilixxic $19,490 XXXXXXX $19,000 $14,917 )OO()(l(XX 31 Building Repair, etc. xxxxxxx X'J.'i:i:\na\nJ. xxxxxxx 32 Other xxxxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxxxx TOTAL(50) xxxxxxx $19.490 xxxxxxx $19.000 $14,917 xxxxxxx 33 Dues and Fees xxxxxxx ss.643 xxxmic S3.ooo ss.495 xxxxxxx 34 Other xrixrix \"JCxxxxn xxxxxxx TOTAL (60) xxxxxicx $5.643 xxxxrix $3,000 $6,495 xxxxxxx TOTAL (30-60) xicrixxx $177.730 \"JCXXXXXX S195,995 $181,252 xxxxxxx TOTAL (10-60) 63.2 S1.799,218 63.2 S1,950,469 S1,897,567 63.7 TOTAL LINE ITEMS- SECOND PAGE) XicXXXXX S64,923 xxxxro $129,543 $145,549 'iY:i:iii:J. S10.700 S97.113 $63,330 $11,500 $3,500 $78.330 $19,000 $19,000 S3,000 $3,000 $197,443 $1,993,878 $128,244 ~t:~!\n~\n~\n::l,~:\n!::::'.l:::!r: \\}i~~~=lt li~9:: +F~::5ni ~9~i:x Stipends $6,044 $13,100 $9,973 S13, 100 Other Objects Indirect Costs $58,412 $112,956 $125,067 $111 ,657 Vocational $2,561 Athletics $4,350 Gifted Proarams $145 $85 $145 Plant Services S2,385 $2,968 $2,385 Readino $82 $32 $82 Science Encilish $239 $85 $239 Soecial Education $467 $636 $428 $636 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Total Line Items $64,923 S129,543 $145,549 $128,244 Per.PupltCosFMW\\f#W fW1.99J::94/f Xf1994,:.9SJ\\ Vfr199~9S\\/ :\\?1995'9\u0026amp; \\ 3rd Otr. ADM or Proi. 597.9 582.0 582.5 607.3 Total Costs $1 ,864,141 $2.080,012 $2,043,116 $2,122,122 PefP.UbiU:ostf#\n%''0,WW WM?$3~t18 mnms3\n574, nn+t$3\n507(\n:.)1s3\n494 19-9~~6.BUDGET PROPOSAL{DRAf.T 3} Gibbs'.'.Magnet School \u0026gt;(': \\ {': .. } 93-94 93-94 . 94-95 94-95 95-96 95-96 F.T.E.. ::.?,, Actual ./ F.T.E. \\. Budget Actual F.T.E. Budqel CERTIFIED 01 Principal 1.0 $59 ,233 1.0 $44,496 $43,068 $154,817 $40,467 $65 ,021 $164,180 1.0 1.0 5.8 $46,100 $42,313 $164 ,921 STAFF 02 Asst Prin. 03 Specialists 1.0 5.8 1.0 $127,098 5.8 04 Counselors 1.0 $40,670 1.0 $40,670 $41,051 1.0 $41 ,861 05 Media Spec. 1.0 $38,684 1.0 $39,257 $39,625 1.0 $40,457 06 Art-Perf./Prod. 07 Music 08 ForniQn LanQ. 09 Classroom 15.0 $462,587 15.0 $433,026 $423,335 15.0 $437.493 10 Special Education 1.5 $70,319 1.5 $52,851 $71 708 1.5 $54.480 11 Gifted 1.0 $33 ,443 1.0 $34 ,246 $34 ,557 1.0 $35,377 12 Chapter 1 13 Substitutes $11,733 $14,000 $14,238 $14 ,000 14 Other-Kindergarten 2.0 $57,912 2.0 $59,580 $60,096 2.0 $61,759 TOTAL CERTIFIED SALARY 29.3 $901 ,679 29.3 $916,011 $954 ,287 29.3 $938,761 I SUPPORT 15 Secretaries 1.4 $15 ,692 1.4 $18,779 $12,127 1.4 $18,906 STAFF t-1-6-+N-u-rs-es---------i--0.-8+---$-11-'-,8-5-6+--0.8- -+---$1-2,'4-4-6-+---S1-0'-.7-87-+--0.-8+---S-12-'-,9-6-.8 t---+-----------i--+---'--'--+---+---''---+---'---+---+--'-\"'---1 17 Custodians 3.0 $39,012 3.0 $39,803 $40,155 3.0 $41 ,024 18 Paraprofessionals-Chptr 1 19 Paraprofessionals-Other 20 Other-Aides 5.6 $33 ,307 5.6 $32,907 $26,814 5.6 $35,152 21 Fringe Benefits(20) xxxxxxx $114,688 xxxxxxx $123,740 $11~ 191 IXlOOOOOI $127,199 TOTAL SUPPORT SALARY 10.8 $214,555 10.8 $227,675 $209 ,273 10.8 $235,248 TOTAL (10-20) lOOOOOO( $1 ,116,234 ~ $1 ,143,686 $1,163,560 iXXlOOOO: $1 ,174,009 PURCHASE ~2::.:2+\n-Ut...\n.iliti...\ne._.\n_s ____~ xioooocx=\n.\n.+--'$...\n.35.:.:,.5\n_8.\n.2+1xxxxxxx=\n.\n.\n.\ni-_..\n._$4-'1.,:.3\n..\n.\n85-+-_...\n..$3...\n.1.:.\n.,8...\n.90~XlOOOOOl.\n.\n.\n.\n.\n..+---$:...4\n:\n.:.2,2::.:6-\"-l3 SERVICES ~2::.:34 T..\n._ra::.:v..:\nel ____ __,i\n,\nl000000(.\n.\n.\n,\n.\n.. __ ---i\n.lxxxxxxx=\n.\n.\n.\ni--$::.:3.\n_.4\n_07-+-__ S\n_1.\n_.4.\n.\n79~xxxxxxx=\n.\n.\ni..---=-S.:.:.3,5::.:0-\"-l0 (30) 24 Maintenance Agreements llOOOOOO( IXlOOOOO( XXlOOOOi 25 Other IXlOOOO()( $6 ,591 lxioooocx $4,000 $7 ,117 ~ $4,000 TOTAL (30) IXlOOOO\u0026lt;X $42,173 IXlOOOOO( $48,792 $40,487 lOOCC(X)( $49,763 MATERIALS, 26 Principal's Office SUPPLIES 27 Regular Classroom booooooc IXlOOOOC( xxioo\u0026lt;xx 1)0()()000( $20,882 lx:ioooixx $25,068 $25,601 w:i\noo. $25,000 (40) 28 Media IXlOOOClOi $3,934 llOOOOOOi $6,600 $2,305 .xii,ooixx $8,000 CAPITAL OUTLAY (50) OTHER (60) 29 Other iXlOOOO()( $1 ,39 7 lxxioocxx $2,455 $1 , 542 lOOOOOO( TOTAL (40) IXlOOOOOI $26,213 IXJOOOOO\u0026lt; $34,123 $29, '. ~9 xxxxxxx $33,000 30 Equipment IXXlOOOOC $1,312 llOOOCXXX $2,646 $12,e42 lOOOOOOC $3 ,700 31 Building Repair, etc. lxxxxioo lxiooocxx xioooocx 32 Other il()()OO(X)( iXlOOOOOC iooo\u0026amp;xx TOTAL (50) !xx:\u0026lt;:()()()( $1 ,312 1Xlixxiixx $2,646 $12,842 )000()00( $3,700 33 Dues and Fees ilOOOOO()( $215 ilOOOOOCX $1 ,155 $1,321 ~ $1,000 34 Other IXXlOOOOC !XlOOOOOI iooixxxx TOTAL(60) lxxxxxicic $215 fu:cixi( $1,155 $1,321 lOOOOOO\u0026lt; $1,000 TOTAL (30-60) 1)()()0000( $69,913 )000000( $86,716 $84,098 ioocfux $87.463 TOTAL (10-60) 40.1 $1,186,147 40.1 $1,230,402 $1,247 ,658 40.1 $1,261,472 TOTAL LINE ITEMS-(SECOND PAGE) !XXXXXXX $29,105 lOOOOOOC $57,993 $55,825 lOOciiooi: $70,963 I ':\u0026lt;':GRANOJOTAt )} t xxxxxx :::tl1'\n215\n252' xxxxxx /\\$1,288\n395 .:? $1\n303,483: xrixxx '\"' $1.332\n.435 t\ni\nt\n:~~~!,\nJ\n~t\n!:::\n\nl' ,\n:n:~~~:~w\n\nn~ 9 ~~~til .\ne~::!~t n\u0026gt;~9 ~~~=f\nStipends $0 Other Objects Indirect Costs $28,874 $56,089 $51,498 $69,059 Vocational $1,055 Athletics $1 ,,91 Gifted Programs $80 $35 $80 Plant Services $1,305 $1,222 $1,305 Readino $42 $13 $42 Science English $129 $35 $129 Special Education $231 $348 $176 $348 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Total Line Items $29,105 $57,993 $55,825 $70,963 P.Mlfupi( CosfMk@ff\nk / 'lM993\n,94${ @(199~% lh'19~95J) %J99S:.96K 3rd atr. ADM or Proi. 295.7 289.0 289.1 296.3 Total Costs $1,215,252 $1,288,395 $1,303,483 $1,332,435 P.ef Ptli\u0026gt;il CostW\u0026amp;!MhfH WH?$41t10 W\u0026lt;P$4\n45a-\nw:MS4\n509i :}F S(\n-497 1995--96 BUDGET PROPOSAL(ORAfl'.3) . Wllfl~nuiMa~nirt Sehoot ' .. ...  CERTIFIED 01 Principal STAFF 02 Asst. Prin. 03 Specialists 04 Counselors 05 Media Spec. 06 Art-Pert/Prod. 07 Music 08 Foreic:in Lanc:i. 09 Classroom 10 Special Education 11 Gifted 12 Chapter 1 13 Substitutes 93-94  93-94 S4-9li F.T.E. Actual F.T.E. 1.0 $65,081 1.0 1.0 $38,931 1.0 5.0 $173 ,230 5.0 1.4 $45,279 1.4 1.0 $25,446 1.0 20.0 $630,446 20.0 1.1 $25,764 1.1 2.0 $40,670 2.0 Budget $60,588 $40,047 $182,894 $41 ,011 $28,846 $660,714 $28,877 $72,728 S4-95 95-96 Actual F .T.E. $60,896 1.0 $40,205 1.0 $184,522 5.0 $41 ,395 1.4 $29,117 1.0 $666,653 20.0 $29 ,147 1.1 $73,389 2.0 Bud11et $62,128 $41 ,246 $188,658 $40 ,195 $30,706 $685,214 S29,957 $75,030 $17 ,314 $16 ,000 $11 ,467 $16,000 14 Other-Kindergarten 3.0 $112,836 3.0 $113,639 $114,639 3.0 $1 17,134 TOTAL CERTIFIED SALARY 35.5 $1 ,174,997 35.5 $1 ,245,344 $1 ,251 ,430 35.5 $1 ,286,269 SUPPORT t-1_5-1-S_ecr_et_ane__s _____2._ 6 _S _2_ 7_, 78_6-+-_2_.6-+-__S_ 41_ ,3 _77-+-__S_ 37,_9_66-+-_2._6_ __$4_ 0'\"'\",7_28-l STAFF 16 Nurses 1.0 $33 ,664 1.0 $35 ,551 $35 ,551 1.0 $36 ,694 17 Custodians 3.5 $44,866 3.5 $46 ,660 $46 ,384 4.0 $47 ,837 18 Paraprofessionals-Chptr 1 19 Paraprofessionals-Other 20 Other-Aides 9.0 $37 ,175 9.0 $44,618 $38,036 9.0 $44,948 21 Fringe Benefits(20) ~ $147 ,956 ~ $166,961 . $156,998 xxxt::1Xt. $172,638 TOTAL SUPPORT SALARY 16.1 $291 ,447 16.1 $335,167 $314,935 16.6 $342,845 TOTAL (10-20) ~ $1 ,466,444 )0()()000( $1 ,580,511 $1 ,566,365 )0()()000( $1 ,629,113 PURCHASE 12-2= U~til=itie.s: ..,_-----~=+-l)(-)().(X:X.)Q.(.\n.\n~$4-4F,46=8 .\n~\n+-. .:.:.:$.5:7,.2=80. .:.+-$.3.9:,6.3:6. :l~xxx4t::=IXt.= ,---$=59-,3=53~ SERVICES 23 Travel XlOOOOO( $4,601 ~ $5 ,000 $558 ~ S5 ,000 t---+--------+---+-----------------1----t-------1 (30) 24 Maintenance Agreements rixxxri: ~ ~ 25 Other ~ $9,938 ,XXX)(XXX $8,000 $13,763 X'T:IXl:XX TOTAL{30) MATERIALS, 26 Principal's Office SUPPLIES 27 Regular Classroom (40) 28 Media 29 Other TOTAL (40) CAPITAL OUTLAY (50) 30 Equipment 31 Buildinc:i Repair, etc. 32 Other TOTAL(50) OTHER 33 Dues and Fees (60) 34 Other Ixxi\u0026amp;xxx $59,007 ~ $70,280 $53,957 x:txxm:. xxri:xxx xxxt::/Xt. xxxt::IXt. ~ $55,228 xxxxxxx $31,698 $54,558 xxxxxxx i\u0026amp;mxx $4,645 i~ $11,000 $4,034 lCOOOOO( ~ $2,095 xx:t::1XXX $2,200 $1,713 ~ ioo:ioooc $61,968 '1X1X1:XX. $44,898 $60,306 '1X1X1:XX. xxxxri:x $6,799 ~ $22,700 $15,921 ~ )()()0()00( lCXXXX:O( ~ x:,\ni:i\niix w:ixxY.. xx:m:xx. xxioooo: $6,799 ~ $22,700 $15,921 ~ ~ $720 ~ $2,000 $1,544 :x:co:xxx $8,000 $72,353 $39,700 $10,000 $2,300 $52,000 $15,598 $15,598 $2,000 TOTAL (60) lOOOOOO( $720 ~ $2,000 $1,544 ~ $2,000 TOTAL (30-60) XlOOOOO( $128,494 w:ixxY.. $139,878 $131,729 '1X1Xf:XX. $141 ,951 TOTAL (10-60) 51.6 $1,594,938 51 .6 $1,720,389 $1,698,093 52.1 $1,771,064 TOTAL LINE ITEMS-(SECOND PAGE) ~ $49,480 ~ $103,657 $106,906 ~ $110,833 : ::ttGRANDTOTAL? i xxxxxx \\/$1\\'644:418 xxxxxx : I S1\nB24\n046: /?$.t805.000 xxxxxx: ' $1J8t89T Urie ttem Co,t5.-\n\n.:, W_c:_._,_..:.:.'_:, . :(/Actual ft .:/ Budoet ,. \" ., Act ual)/i \\\\Budget \nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eLittle Rock School District\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"loc_rosaparks_47451","title":"[Mamie Till-Mobley (left), Rosa Parks (center) and Rev. Willie Barrow at a church event] [graphic].","collection_id":"loc_rosaparks","collection_title":"Rosa Parks Papers","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Michigan, Wayne County, Detroit, 42.33143, -83.04575"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1995"],"dcterms_description":["Photograph shows a group portrait of Till-Mobley, Parks and Barrow. Possibly at St. John Presbyterian Church in Detroit, Michigan.","Title devised by Library staff."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":null,"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":null,"dcterms_title":["[Mamie Till-Mobley (left), Rosa Parks (center) and Rev. Willie Barrow at a church event] [graphic]."],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Library of Congress"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.47451"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Please contact holding institution for information regarding use and copyright status."],"dcterms_medium":["photographic printscolor1990-2000.gmgpc","portrait photographs1990-2000.gmgpc","group portraits"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","Till-Mobley, Mamie, 1921-2003","Barrow, Willie T. (Willie Taplin), 1924-2015"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"loc_rosaparks_47501","title":"[Mamie Till-Mobley, Rosa Parks, Elaine Steele, Myrlie Evers Williams and Betty Shabazz at a session during the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation, 25th Legislative Conference, Washington, D.C., Sept., 1995] [graphic].","collection_id":"loc_rosaparks","collection_title":"Rosa Parks Papers","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, District of Columbia, Washington, 38.89511, -77.03637"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1995"],"dcterms_description":["Title devised by Library staff.","Possibly related to a press conference or meeting of the National Political Congress of Black Women during the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation meeting."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":null,"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":null,"dcterms_title":["[Mamie Till-Mobley, Rosa Parks, Elaine Steele, Myrlie Evers Williams and Betty Shabazz at a session during the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation, 25th Legislative Conference, Washington, D.C., Sept., 1995] [graphic]."],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Library of Congress"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.47501"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Please contact holding institution for information regarding use and copyright status."],"dcterms_medium":["photographic printscolor1990-2000.gmgpc"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","Till-Mobley, Mamie, 1921-2003","Steele, Elaine Eason","Evers-Williams, Myrlie","Shabazz, Betty"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"loc_rosaparks_47450","title":"[Mamie Till-Mobley speaking at a church event with Rosa Parks and journalist Vernon Jarrett] [graphic].","collection_id":"loc_rosaparks","collection_title":"Rosa Parks Papers","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Michigan, Wayne County, Detroit, 42.33143, -83.04575"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1995"],"dcterms_description":["Photograph shows three speakers who attended the event: Vernon Jarrett (left), Rosa Parks and Mamie Till-Mobley (right). Possibly at St. John Presbyterian Church in Detroit, Michigan.","Title devised by Library staff."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":null,"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":null,"dcterms_title":["[Mamie Till-Mobley speaking at a church event with Rosa Parks and journalist Vernon Jarrett] [graphic]."],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Library of Congress"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.47450"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Please contact holding institution for information regarding use and copyright status."],"dcterms_medium":["photographic printscolor1990-2000.gmgpc"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","Till-Mobley, Mamie, 1921-2003","Jarrett, Vernon, 1921-2004"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"loc_rosaparks_47652","title":"[Million Man March, Washington, D.C., 1995] [graphic].","collection_id":"loc_rosaparks","collection_title":"Rosa Parks Papers","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, District of Columbia, Washington, 38.89511, -77.03637"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1995"],"dcterms_description":["Title devised by Library staff."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":null,"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["Million Man March (1995 : Washington, D.C.)"],"dcterms_title":["[Million Man March, Washington, D.C., 1995] [graphic]."],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Library of Congress"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.47652"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Please contact holding institution for information regarding use and copyright status."],"dcterms_medium":["photographic printscolor1990-2000.gmgpc"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"loc_rosaparks_47655","title":"[Million Man March, Washington, D.C., 1995] [graphic].","collection_id":"loc_rosaparks","collection_title":"Rosa Parks Papers","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, District of Columbia, Washington, 38.89511, -77.03637"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1995"],"dcterms_description":["Title devised by Library staff."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":null,"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["Million Man March (1995 : Washington, D.C.)"],"dcterms_title":["[Million Man March, Washington, D.C., 1995] [graphic]."],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Library of Congress"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.47655"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Please contact holding institution for information regarding use and copyright status."],"dcterms_medium":["photographic printscolor1990-2000.gmgpc"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"loc_rosaparks_47663","title":"[Million Man March, Washington, D.C., 1995] [graphic].","collection_id":"loc_rosaparks","collection_title":"Rosa Parks Papers","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, District of Columbia, Washington, 38.89511, -77.03637"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1995"],"dcterms_description":["Title devised by Library staff."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":null,"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["Million Man March (1995 : Washington, D.C.)"],"dcterms_title":["[Million Man March, Washington, D.C., 1995] [graphic]."],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Library of Congress"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.47663"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Please contact holding institution for information regarding use and copyright status."],"dcterms_medium":["photographic printscolor1990-2000.gmgpc"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"loc_rosaparks_47667","title":"[Million Man March, Washington, D.C., 1995] [graphic].","collection_id":"loc_rosaparks","collection_title":"Rosa Parks Papers","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, District of Columbia, Washington, 38.89511, -77.03637"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1995"],"dcterms_description":["Title devised by Library staff."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":null,"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["Million Man March (1995 : Washington, D.C.)"],"dcterms_title":["[Million Man March, Washington, D.C., 1995] [graphic]."],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Library of Congress"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.47667"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Please contact holding institution for information regarding use and copyright status."],"dcterms_medium":["photographic printscolor1990-2000.gmgpc"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"loc_rosaparks_47649","title":"[Million Man March, Washington, D.C., 1995] [graphic].","collection_id":"loc_rosaparks","collection_title":"Rosa Parks Papers","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, District of Columbia, Washington, 38.89511, -77.03637"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1995"],"dcterms_description":["Title devised by Library staff."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":null,"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["Million Man March (1995 : Washington, D.C.)"],"dcterms_title":["[Million Man March, Washington, D.C., 1995] [graphic]."],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Library of Congress"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.47649"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Please contact holding institution for information regarding use and copyright status."],"dcterms_medium":["photographic printscolor1990-2000.gmgpc"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null}],"pages":{"current_page":502,"next_page":503,"prev_page":501,"total_pages":6797,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":6012,"total_count":81557,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"educator_resource_mediums_sms","items":[{"value":"lesson plans","hits":319},{"value":"teaching guides","hits":53},{"value":"timelines (chronologies)","hits":43},{"value":"online exhibitions","hits":38},{"value":"bibliographies","hits":15},{"value":"study guides","hits":11},{"value":"annotated bibliographies","hits":9},{"value":"learning modules","hits":6},{"value":"worksheets","hits":6},{"value":"slide shows","hits":4},{"value":"quizzes","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":40428},{"value":"StillImage","hits":35298},{"value":"MovingImage","hits":4529},{"value":"Sound","hits":3226},{"value":"Collection","hits":41},{"value":"InteractiveResource","hits":25}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"Peppler, Jim","hits":4965},{"value":"Phay, John E.","hits":4712},{"value":"University of Mississippi. Bureau of Educational Research","hits":4707},{"value":"Baldowski, Clifford H., 1917-1999","hits":2599},{"value":"Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission","hits":2255},{"value":"Thurmond, Strom, 1902-2003","hits":2077},{"value":"WSB-TV (Television station : Atlanta, Ga.)","hits":1475},{"value":"Newman, I. DeQuincey (Isaiah DeQuincey), 1911-1985","hits":1003},{"value":"The State Media Company (Columbia, S.C.)","hits":926},{"value":"Atlanta Journal-Constitution","hits":844},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":778}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"African Americans--Civil rights","hits":9445},{"value":"Civil rights","hits":8328},{"value":"African Americans","hits":5912},{"value":"Mississippi--Race relations","hits":5750},{"value":"Race relations","hits":5604},{"value":"Education, Secondary","hits":5083},{"value":"Education, Elementary","hits":4729},{"value":"Segregation in education--Mississippi","hits":4727},{"value":"Education--Pictorial works","hits":4707},{"value":"Civil rights demonstrations","hits":4440},{"value":"Civil rights workers","hits":3536}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966--Correspondence","hits":1888},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1815},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1709},{"value":"Baker, Augusta, 1911-1998","hits":1495},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1312},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1071},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":858},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":814},{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":719},{"value":"Mizell, M. Hayes","hits":674},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":626}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"name_authoritative_sms","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":2598},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1915},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1704},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1331},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1070},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":856},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":806},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":625},{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":605},{"value":"Snelling, Paula","hits":580},{"value":"Williams, Hosea, 1926-2000","hits":440}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Nobel Prize","hits":1769},{"value":"Ole Miss Integration","hits":1670},{"value":"Housing Act of 1961","hits":969},{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":853},{"value":"Memphis Sanitation Workers Strike","hits":366},{"value":"Selma-Montgomery March","hits":337},{"value":"Freedom Summer","hits":306},{"value":"Freedom Rides","hits":214},{"value":"Poor People's Campaign","hits":180},{"value":"University of Georgia Integration","hits":173},{"value":"University of Alabama Integration","hits":140}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":17987},{"value":"United States, Georgia, Fulton County, Atlanta, 33.749, -84.38798","hits":5437},{"value":"United States, Alabama, Montgomery County, Montgomery, 32.36681, -86.29997","hits":5151},{"value":"United States, Georgia, 32.75042, -83.50018","hits":4847},{"value":"United States, South Carolina, 34.00043, -81.00009","hits":4599},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":4328},{"value":"United States, Alabama, 32.75041, -86.75026","hits":3948},{"value":"United States, Mississippi, 32.75041, -89.75036","hits":2910},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":2580},{"value":"United States, Tennessee, Shelby County, Memphis, 35.14953, -90.04898","hits":2580},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":2536}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Georgia","hits":12823},{"value":"Alabama","hits":11313},{"value":"Mississippi","hits":10220},{"value":"South Carolina","hits":8493},{"value":"Arkansas","hits":4733},{"value":"Texas","hits":4399},{"value":"Tennessee","hits":3786},{"value":"Florida","hits":2602},{"value":"Ohio","hits":2403},{"value":"North Carolina","hits":1875},{"value":"New York","hits":1840}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1966","hits":10632},{"value":"1963","hits":10287},{"value":"1965","hits":10218},{"value":"1956","hits":9840},{"value":"1955","hits":9619},{"value":"1964","hits":9365},{"value":"1968","hits":9345},{"value":"1962","hits":9247},{"value":"1967","hits":8897},{"value":"1957","hits":8523},{"value":"1961","hits":8282},{"value":"1958","hits":8259},{"value":"1959","hits":8061},{"value":"1960","hits":7948},{"value":"1969","hits":7348},{"value":"1954","hits":7240},{"value":"1950","hits":7118},{"value":"1953","hits":6969},{"value":"1970","hits":6835},{"value":"1971","hits":6425},{"value":"1977","hits":6367},{"value":"1972","hits":6254},{"value":"1952","hits":6162},{"value":"1951","hits":6046},{"value":"1975","hits":5894},{"value":"1976","hits":5863},{"value":"1974","hits":5849},{"value":"1973","hits":5689},{"value":"1979","hits":5416},{"value":"1978","hits":5405},{"value":"1980","hits":5366},{"value":"1995","hits":4885},{"value":"1981","hits":4811},{"value":"1994","hits":4704},{"value":"1948","hits":4597},{"value":"1949","hits":4573},{"value":"1996","hits":4542},{"value":"1982","hits":4417},{"value":"1947","hits":4317},{"value":"1985","hits":4313},{"value":"1998","hits":4281},{"value":"1983","hits":4261},{"value":"1997","hits":4258},{"value":"1984","hits":4152},{"value":"1999","hits":4074},{"value":"1946","hits":4047},{"value":"1945","hits":4018},{"value":"1986","hits":4006},{"value":"1990","hits":3988},{"value":"1943","hits":3900},{"value":"1944","hits":3896},{"value":"2000","hits":3894},{"value":"2001","hits":3876},{"value":"1942","hits":3868},{"value":"1940","hits":3765},{"value":"1941","hits":3758},{"value":"1987","hits":3744},{"value":"2002","hits":3624},{"value":"1991","hits":3553},{"value":"1936","hits":3507},{"value":"1939","hits":3501},{"value":"1992","hits":3500},{"value":"2003","hits":3489},{"value":"1993","hits":3478},{"value":"1938","hits":3466},{"value":"1937","hits":3450},{"value":"1989","hits":3441},{"value":"1930","hits":3378},{"value":"1988","hits":3355},{"value":"1935","hits":3307},{"value":"1933","hits":3271},{"value":"1934","hits":3271},{"value":"1932","hits":3255},{"value":"1931","hits":3240},{"value":"2005","hits":3143},{"value":"2004","hits":2995},{"value":"2006","hits":2860},{"value":"1929","hits":2790},{"value":"1928","hits":2272},{"value":"1921","hits":2124},{"value":"1925","hits":2040},{"value":"1927","hits":2026},{"value":"1924","hits":2012},{"value":"2016","hits":2011},{"value":"1926","hits":2010},{"value":"1920","hits":1976},{"value":"1923","hits":1955},{"value":"1922","hits":1929},{"value":"2007","hits":1715},{"value":"2008","hits":1664},{"value":"2011","hits":1661},{"value":"2009","hits":1624},{"value":"2019","hits":1623},{"value":"2015","hits":1613},{"value":"2013","hits":1604},{"value":"2010","hits":1601},{"value":"2014","hits":1567},{"value":"2012","hits":1553},{"value":"1919","hits":1533},{"value":"1918","hits":1531}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"0193","max":"2035","count":506439,"missing":56},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"photographs","hits":10710},{"value":"correspondence","hits":9628},{"value":"black-and-white photographs","hits":7678},{"value":"negatives (photographs)","hits":7513},{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":4462},{"value":"letters (correspondence)","hits":3623},{"value":"oral histories (literary works)","hits":3607},{"value":"black-and-white negatives","hits":2771},{"value":"editorial cartoons","hits":2620},{"value":"newspapers","hits":1955},{"value":"manuscripts (documents)","hits":1692}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/","hits":41201},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":17721},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/UND/1.0/","hits":8830},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/","hits":7090},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/","hits":2186},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/","hits":1778},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-CR/1.0/","hits":1115},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","hits":145},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/","hits":60},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-RUU/1.0/","hits":51},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","hits":27}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Jim Peppler Southern Courier Photograph Collection","hits":4956},{"value":"John E. Phay Collection ","hits":4706},{"value":"John J. Herrera Papers","hits":3288},{"value":"Baldy Editorial Cartoons, 1946-1982, 1997: Clifford H. Baldowski Editorial Cartoons at the Richard B. Russell Library.","hits":2607},{"value":"Sovereignty Commission Online","hits":2335},{"value":"Strom Thurmond Collection, Mss 100","hits":2068},{"value":"Alabama Media Group Collection","hits":2067},{"value":"Black Trailblazers, Leaders, Activists, and Intellectuals in Cleveland","hits":2033},{"value":"Rosa Parks Papers","hits":1948},{"value":"Isaiah DeQuincey Newman, (1911-1985), Papers, 1929-2003","hits":1904},{"value":"Lillian Eugenia Smith Papers (circa 1920-1980)","hits":1887}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"John Davis Williams Library. Department of Archives and Special Collections","hits":8885},{"value":"Alabama. Department of Archives and History","hits":8153},{"value":"South Caroliniana Library","hits":4251},{"value":"Atlanta University Center Robert W. Woodruff Library","hits":4102},{"value":"University of North Texas. Libraries","hits":3854},{"value":"University of South Carolina. Libraries","hits":3438},{"value":"Hargrett Library","hits":3292},{"value":"Richard B. Russell Library for Political Research and Studies","hits":2874},{"value":"Mississippi. Department of Archives and History","hits":2825},{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":2785},{"value":"Rhodes College","hits":2264}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":81102},{"value":"Collection","hits":455}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":81360},{"value":"true","hits":197}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}