{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"tmll_hpcrc_69702934","title":"A community forum to explore race relations in St. Petersburg, Florida : executive summary of a community forum held December 3-4, 1996, St. Petersburg, FL","collection_id":"tmll_hpcrc","collection_title":"Historical Publications of the United States Commission on Civil Rights","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Florida, Pinellas County, 27.90268, -82.73955","United States, Florida, Pinellas County, Saint Petersburg, 27.77086, -82.67927"],"dcterms_creator":["United States Commission on Civil Rights. Florida Advisory Committee"],"dc_date":["1996/1998"],"dcterms_description":["A digital version of the report published by the United States Commission on Civil Rights.","The Civil Rights Digital Library received support from a National Leadership Grant for Libraries awarded to the University of Georgia by the Institute of Museum and Library Services for the aggregation and enhancement of partner metadata."],"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":null,"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":["Forms part of online collection: Historical Publications of the United States Commission on Civil Rights.","Requires Acrobat plug-in to view files."],"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["Saint Petersburg (Fla.)--Race relations","Civil rights--Florida--Saint Petersburg","Police-community relations--Florida--Saint Petersburg"],"dcterms_title":["A community forum to explore race relations in St. Petersburg, Florida : executive summary of a community forum held December 3-4, 1996, St. Petersburg, FL"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Thurgood Marshall Law Library"],"edm_is_shown_by":["http://www2.law.umaryland.edu/Marshall/usccr/documents/cr12r117z.pdf"],"edm_is_shown_at":["http://crdl.usg.edu/id:tmll_hpcrc_69702934"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports","records"],"dcterms_extent":["19 p. ; 28 cm."],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_365","title":"Correspondence","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1996/2004"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Education--Evaluation","School improvement programs"],"dcterms_title":["Correspondence"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/365"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["correspondence"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n- -re^f RECEIVED JAN 5 1996 Office of Desegregation MonitoringCf^: A'fiMe 4c?. ^f1 1 RECEfv ijpy.nr Little Rock School District JAN 1 2 1996 J Vo ^.-\u0026gt;1 Office Of Desegregation Momtcnnr. January 11, 199S Mr. John Walker, Attorney At Law 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Dear Mr. Walker: I am pleased that you are willing to discuss the role of the Advisory Committee For Financial Stability with me. With regard to the Committees role as it relates to making recommendations for specific changes in the Desegregation Plan, there is none. The Committees intent is to merely recommend that the LRSD Board follow a logical process in the development of its budget. We feel that there will be greater public support for additional revenue in the form of a millage, if required, if the public knows that a logical process has been followed and all expense reduction strategies have been examined. Additional revenue in the form of increased taxes should only be sought as a last resort to maintain quality educational programs. I will contact your office today or tomonow to arrange a time for us to visit. Sincerely, rred L. Smith Manager of Support Services FLS:ca cc: Ms. Linda Pondexter Ms. Judy Magness Dr. Henry P. Williams Dr. Russ Mayo Ms. Ann Brown 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501)374-3361 Cp. .6en: ,, JOHN w. Walker, p.a. ATTORNEY At Law 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 Telephone (501) 374-3758 FAX (501) 374-4187 RECEIVED .I4N ) 2 1996 Office of Desegregaiicn Morutonny JOHN W. WALKER RALPH WASHINGTON MARK BURNETTE AUSTIN PORTER. JR. via Pacsimila - 324-2146 Mr. Fred Smith Manager of Support Services Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Fred\nYou indicated that we should talk. I am available at any time to discuss any action which will strengthened the school Hd i1=s5-t1-rr-iirctt- wwiitthhiinn the context of the desegregation ppllaann.. I am not available for any other agenda. At the meeting this morning, you indicated that we were not to discuss the ramifications of the desegregation plan in this committee. I believe that one of the agenda items (points in the process) is \"start desegregation plan modification process if required. Another one is \"to seek additional revenue, if required\". _I do -n-o-t understand how you can recommend cut backs on programs which are desegregation in nature for economic reasons where you have not first sought and been denied additional revenue. There seems to be a presumption that you would be denied additional revenue for desegregation if you sought it. That is not an acceptable premise within the context of the desegregation plan. I look forward to visiting with you in the future regarding this and other matters. I also wish to thank you for providing me with the information regarding past meetings. Very truly yours, ohn W. Walker JWW:js cc: Ms. Linda Pondexter Ms. Judy Magness (Committee Board representative) Dr. Henry Williams Ms. Ann Brown t. City of Little Rock Charles Nickerson City Manager City Hall 500 W. Markham Little Rock. Arkansas 72201-1429 (501)371-4510 FAX # (501) 371-4498 December 22, 1995 COPY J Li Dr. Henry Williams, Superintendent Little Rock School District 810 W. Markham Little Rock AR 72201 JAM 1 8 1996 Office of Desesregaiicn Monnoiiiiy Dear Dr. Williams: a At a recent meeting of the Little Rock Neighborhood Connection organization, there was strong interest to have more detailed presentation of issues related to the Little Rock Public Schools at toe January' meeting of toe m-oup. The Neighborhood Connection is an organization consisting of the Presidents of each of toe'88 orsanized neighborhood associations located throughout the city. The group meets quarterly to discuss a variety of conTmunitv issues and concerns related to neighborhood reviulization. The next meeting has been set for January 20, 1996 and will be devoted totally to public school issues. The meetine wwiillll hbpe bhpellrdl afStt the PCTilt-yt/sc TU niversity Park AA dult TL e-.1is__u_r_e. Center, 6401 W. 12th. A continental. .b reakfast begins at 8:00 a.m. and the meeting begins at 8:30 a.m. The group has set aside two hours for discussion of the key school issues. T1 nhcerrce aarree tfoouurr ssppeecciifriicc aarreeaass ootf ccoonncceerrnn bbyy tthhee nneeiigghhbboorrhhoooodd ccoonnnneeccttiioonn ggrroouupp.. We ask that you have representatives from toe district to address each of toe areas and be prepared for questions and discussion related to toe topics. It would be beneficial if School Board members could also attend. First, there is strong interest in toe Strategic Planning Process that is now being completed by the District. We would like additional information - a-----------------------3------------------------ vuuipittcu uy uic uisirici. we wouiu iiKe aoQitionai mtormation on the process being used, the results and *e direction being set by the District Second, we understand that the School Facility Plan has been completed and that it has been recognized as a valuable product. We would like information about the plan and the implementation strategy. In addition, toere is a great interest in the financial status of the School District particularlv in the years ahead. We ask for a review of the fiscal plan of the District with emphasis on the next five years and whatever implications this may have related to school services and facilities. Finally, there tLcr.\" L.:___ _ L. J.. ^,,3^ lawsuit. A history of the litigation and the School Districts role in responding would also be very helpful. is strong interest in the status of the desegregation The result of our January meeting- should be an increased level of understanding by Little Rocks neighborhood leaders on a variety of issues related to the public school district There is a strong feeling on behalf of our neighborhood leaders to help the district and to serve and motivate neighborhood associations to be helpful in addressing school district issues and to participate in finding solutions. This is a great opportunity to beain a positive and on-going dialogue between e District and our key neighborhood leaders. We look forward to your participation in this meeting. Please advise if any audio visual or additional equipment is needed. If you have other questions, please call. Sincerely, Charles Nickerson City Manager CN/CC/lm City of Little Rock Office of the Mayor City Hall. Room 203 500 W. Markham St. Little Rock. Arkansas 72201-1427- (501)371-4516 FAX (501) 371-4498 REG COPY January 9, 1996 JAN 1 3 1956 Ms. Linda Pondexter, President Little Rock School Board 502 Green Mountain Dr., #56 Little Rock, AR 72211 Office ci Dessjrstjaiicn ivcnaofing Dear Ms. Pondexter: I personally encourage you to attend a special meeting of the Citys Neighborhood Connection group set for Saturday, January 20, 1996, at University Park Adult Leisure Center, 6401 West 12th Street. The Neighborhood Connection is a recently formed group of neighborhood leaders including the presidents of all organized neighborhood associations. The group has successfully met during the past year and has addressed a wide variety of important community topics. The January session has been established to exclusively address a variety of public school issues. The letter inviting Superintendent Williams to the meeting and outlining the key issues is attached. The morning starts with an informal continental breakfast at 8:00 a.m. with the meeting beginning at 8:30 a.m. As you will note in the letter to Dr. Williams, this is a unique opportunity to continue to build the relationship between neighborhood leaders and the school district and for neighborhood leaders to offer assistance in addressing school/community issues. Neighborhood Connection citizens have requested a presentation on the school districts recently adopted Strategic Plan, and an overview of the districts financial picture. In addition, a detailed review of the newly published facility plan would be helpful. Also, please include any particulars related to school closings and an update on the desegregation plan. We have set aside the morning of January 20, for this session and I look forward to your participation. If we can provide additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Jim Daily Mayor JD/rs Attachment.///co 7 Little Rock School District January 22, 1996 J\u0026amp;N 2 4 \u0026gt;996 Office of To: From: Subj ect: Ann Brown, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring\ntV \"Linda Young and -Leon Modeste Strategic Plan Facilitators Little Rock School District Strategic Plan In accordance with our telephone conversation, we are responding to your request for an update on the Strategic Plan. We are most grateful to you and your staff for taking the time to read the LRSD Strategic Plan. Also, we deeply appreciate your support and thoughtful comments. There were two specific questions that you were concerned about: First, what are our expectations of funding action plans that are expensive? It is our intention to implement a funding strategy with the support of our advisory committees. We will be seeking a variety of funding sources. However, this is not anticipated for this first year. Second, a response to your request regarding implementation: We are currently making preparations to move into the most difficult part of 'implementation phase\". the Strategic Plan, which is the Dr. Williams has assigned key administrators to specific strategies (See Attached). On January 30 and 31, 1996, Dr. Howard Fedema will facilitate the \"Mutual Expectations Workshop\". At that time the key administrators will began to design their work through the lens of the strategic plan. If you or any of your staff wish to attend the workshops, please feel free to inform us 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501)324-2000Response to Strategic Plan page 2 Accountability, time schedules, and quarterly check points will be set in an effort to monitor what progress is being made. In the Fall of 1996, ve will reconvene the over-all planning committee to evaluate the progress of the Strategic Plan during the first year. If you should have additional questions, please feel free to contact us. In fact, if you are interested, we would be willing to meet with you for a more detailed discussion. LY/LEM/dge Attachment cc: Dr. Henry WilliamsResponse to Strategic Plan page 3 Attachment strategy Assigned Administrator #1 Curriculum Gene Parker, Supervisor Communications, English, ESL, and Foreign Languages/ Acting Director of Reading #2 Desegregation Russ Mayo, Associate Supt. of Desegregation #3 Scores Below 50% Victor Anderson, Asst. Superintendent/Secondary #4 Communications Suellen Vann, Director, Communications #5 Community Partnerships Debbie Milam, VIPS Coordinator *6 Personnel Brady Gadberiry, Director Labor Relations #7 Staff Development Sterling Ingram, Director Staff Development #8 Equity Patty Kohler, Director Div. of Except. Children 9 Finances Fred Smith, Manager Support Services #10 Safety JoEvelyn Elston, Director Pupil Sezrvices #11 Technology David Beason, Director Information Services Strategic Plan Facilitators Linda Young, Liaison New Futures/Restructuring Director Leon E. Modeste, Special Asst, to SuperintendentI I If Q UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS REGION VI Arkansas, Louisiana. Mississippi, Oklahoma, Texas 1200 MAIN STREET, ROOM 2260 DALLAS. TEXAS 75202 RECEIVED JAM, 2 6 1996 FEB 51996 Ref\n06955012 Office of Deseflregation Moniiomiy Dr. Henry P. Williams, Superintendent Little Rock School District 810 Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Dear Dr. Williams: The Office for Civil Rights (OCR), U.S. Department of Education, has completed its compliance review of the Little Rock School District (LRSD), Little Rock, Arkansas. The compliance review addressed the issue of whether the LRSD discriminates against minority students by failing to identify and place them in its gifted and talented educational programs/classes, on the basis of race, in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. OCR is responsible for enforcing Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VI), 42 U.S.C. 2000d et s^g., and its implementing regulation, at 34 C.F.R. Part 100, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in educational programs and activities receiving Federal financial assistance. The LRSD is a recipient of Federal financial assistance from the U.S. Department of Education, and is subject to the reguirements of Title VI. Our investigation determined that the LRSD is operating under a Federal court order. Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District No. 1, et al., 584 F. Supp. (E.D. Ark. 1984) affirmed 778 F. 2d 404 (8th Cir 1985) . pertinent part, the order addresses the desegregation of the LRSD. In addition, OCR determined that the LRSD along with Pulaski County Special School District No. 1 and the North Little LRSD. 328 In Rock School District were placed under an interdistrict countywide remedial desegregation plan which included a responsibility of all three Our mission is to ensure equal access to education and to promote educational excellence throughout the Nation Page 2 - Dr. Henry P. Williams, Superintendent school districts to increase minority participation in G/T (gifted and talented) programs. II Under the requirements of the Federal court order, there are specific steps outlined and II approved by the Federal court for achieving increases in the number of minority students attending the LRSD. During the investigation, OCR reviewed records of gifted and talented program students as well as the records of students that were identified as potential gifted and talented program students in the district\nand reviewed the district's policies and procedures regarding gifted and talented education identification, evaluation and placement. teachers, administrators and parents. OCR also interviewed On the basis of evidence submitted by the LRSD and testimony provided by witnesses, OCR has determined that there exists a significant underrepresentation of minorities in the LRSD's gifted and talented educational programs in 62.5% of the District's schools. Inasmuch as the Federal court maintains jurisdiction in Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District No. 1, et al, supra, and the ongoing nature of the court litigation, OCR has referred the enclosed findings and a list of suggested recommendations to address this area and will defer to the decision of the United States District Court, for the Eastern District of Arkansas, for whatever action it deems necessary. Therefore, OCR is closing this compliance review as of the date of this letter. However, the LRSD is urged to evaluate its identification, evaluation and placement policies and procedures to ensure that the underrepresentation of minority students is not caused by any actions on the part of the LRSD's gifted and talented education placement process that may be discriminatory on the basis of race. Under the Freedom of Information Act, it may be necessary to release this document and related correspondence and records upon In the event that OCR receives such a request, we will request. seek to protect, to the extent provided by law, personally identifiable information which, unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. if released, could constitute an This letter of findings addresses only the issue discussed herein and should not be construed to cover any other issues regarding compliance with Title VI which may exist.Page 3 - Dr. Henry P. Williams, Superintendent Thank you for the cooperation extended to OCR staff during the conduct of this compliance review. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Ms. Page Baird or Mr. Eddie Laney of our staff, at 214/767-9443. Sincerely, Tayl or D. Augus Regional Civil Right Region VI Director J Enclosure cc: Chief State School Officer Ann Brown Metropolitan Desegregation Supervisor Office of Desegregation 201 East Markham Suite 510 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 LITTLE ROCK (ARKANSAS) SCHOOL DISTRICT OCR CASE #06955012 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS I. Overview\nThe Little Rock School District (LRSD) operates 53 campuses, including 5 II incentive elementary schools (desegregation campuses receiving extra funding), 13 magnet schools (7 elementary, 3 junior high, and 3 high school), and 4 interdistrict elementary schools. According to statistical data provided, the district serves 25,195 students with 4,072 students enrolled in its academically oriented Gifted Education Program (GEP). II. Analysis of GEP Enrollment Utilizing Fisher's Exact Test (FET), OCR's analysis of data provided by LRSD yielded statistically significant underrepresentation of black students when comparing overall student enrollment to GEP enrollment for the 1994-95 school year. Based on 1994-95 data (grades 3-12), 30 (62.5%) of 48 LRSD campus GEP's, were underrepresented for black students (statistically significant) by a projected 860 students. To account for the effects of interdistrict transfer, OCR also conducted a FET on combined student and GEP enrollment for all three districts, which was also statistically significant for underrepresentation of black students, total of 640 students less than expected frequencies. a LRSD Campuses with statistical underrepresentation of black students in the GEP were as follows: Elementary: 21 of 35 campuses were underrepresented for black students. Carver Magnet Fair Park Booker Magnet Forest Park Chicot Fulbright Brady Geyer Spring Gibbs Magnet McDermott Terry Woodruff Jefferson Meadowcliff Wakefield M.L. King Otter Creek Washington Mablevale Pulaski Heights Western Hills Middle Schools black students. 5 of 8 campuses were underrepresented for Dunbar Jr. High Magnet (LRSD Gifted and Talented Magnet) Henderson Mann Jr. High Magnet Mablevale Pulaski HeightsPage 2 - Findings and Recommendations High Schools 4 of 5 campuses were underrepresented for black students. Central High Hall High J.A. Fair High McClellan High OCR found that the LRSD offers academically oriented GEP services for 4,072 identified students (1994-95 data) in grades 3-6 (enrichment, resource rooms) and special GEP classes (e.g.. Advanced Placement, Honors) for grades 7-12. Based on information provided by the LRSD, OCR also found that the LRSD, North Little Rock School District (NLRSD), and the Pulaski County Special School District No.l (PCSD) transfer students across district borders in order to achieve Federal court mandated racial percentages of 45%/55% black/white student enrollment. The LRSD's GEP supervisor indicated that transfer students included GEP students, but no numerical data was provided to OCR on the number or race but of transfer students. Based on 1994-95 student enrollment, OCR found statistically significant underrepresentation of black students enrolled in the GEP and in the number of black students versus white and other race students nominated for GEP evaluation. However, OCR did not find a statistical significant racial disparity among nominees who were placed following evaluation. The data suggests that black students may be screened out at the referral level. As the referral data provided did not include information on the referring party, OCR was unable to determine if the underrepresentation in referrals was due to low teacher versus parent referrals or both. Documentation provided by the district for 1994-95 for sample schools indicated that 93.6% of referrals occurred at level). the elementary level and 6.4% at the junior high (secondary level). This documentation also revealed that the majority of elementary children referred are from grade 2 (approximately 2/3's). Based on the information reviewed, OCR concludes that the LRSD had written criteria to identify students for GEP services, and that these criteria .were neutral and non- discriminatory on face with regard to race/ethnicity. AtPage 3 - Findings and Recommendations the elementary level, the review revealed that the GEP criteria consists of a standardized achievement test with a screening score cutoff at the 50th percentile level Stanford Achievement Test Sth Edition (SAT-8), the Torrence Test of Creative Thinking (TTCT), a standardized creativity test, . teacher referral checklist form, and grades\noccasionally, scores on a non-verbal ability test Raven's Progressive Matrixes Test (Raven's) were also utilized. At the junior high level, the criteria were the same except for a different standardized creativity instrument, Williams Divergent Thinking Test from Creativity Assessment Package (CAP/DT). a OCR found that the LRSD utilized a 50 percentile cutoff score on selected SAT-8 subtests in screening GEP candidates. OCR reviewed the 1994 mean \"Complete Battery\" scores of students districtwide on the SAT-8 which revealed a large racial disparity among scores, with black students scores at roughly half of white students' scores. At all grade levels from 1-11, black LRSD students average SAT-8 percentile scores below 50 percentile on the complete battery. OCR found limited validity and reliability data for the creativity instruments. Stronger validity and reliability data were available for the SAT-8, which was reviewed for racial bias by a panel of minority educators. The Evaluation Assistance Center-West (EAC) funded by the U.S. Department of Education advised that a (I band width\" rather than fixed cutoff score for the SAT-8 would take into account the standard error of measurement for the instrument. Information provided by the EAC suggests that the non-verbal ability test may be the most effective of the program's standardized criteria for identifying culturally and linguistically diverse students. III. Recommendations TESTING TkND ASSESSMENT OCR recommends that a review of the standardized criteria used in the GEP identification process be conducted. especially in the use of a fixed cutoff It is score. further suggested that all standardized instruments be reviewed to determine if empirical data support the validity and reliability of the use of the tests for the purpose ofPage 4 - Findings and Recommendations gifted and talented student identification. It is further recommended that the District(s) evaluate the ethnic composition of the norming sample to determine whether it is reflective of the District's student population and to ascertain whether the test manufacturers have attempted to control for racial bias, particularly with regard to the creativity instruments. Finally, the District(s) is advised to monitor the performance of its students by ethnic group on standardized instruments used for GEP identification. NOTIFICATION AND DISSEMINATION OF GEP INFORMATION Documentation reviewed and statements of LRSD staff and parents indicated that dissemination of GEP information to parents is primarily limited to cursory information in general District brochures. The LRSD did provide documentation of GEP parent in-services at some schools. However, documentation and parent interviews suggested that these in-services tended to target the parents of children who had already been referred rather than parents whose children had not been referred.  Interviews with a random sample of black and white parents suggested parental awareness among the majority of both groups\nhowever, white parents were more likely to report having had a child referred to the GEP. few parents were aware of the Also, program's identification criteria. However, OCR concludes that there is no pattern of differential treatment based on race with regard to dissemination of GEP information. program It is recommended that the following recommendations be considered: 1. Disseminate GEP information to parents whose children have not been previously referred for identification, including information on the criteria for GEP placement\n2 . Conduct outreach to local minority organizations to increase awareness of the GEP and the characteristics of gifted children\nand 3 . Provide training to all district administrators, counselors, teachers, and School Based Committee (SBC) members regarding the characteristics of giftedne students, including culturally diverse students. ss in training should also address the non-discrimination provisions of Title VI. ThePage 5 - Findings and Recommendations Based on the findings in this review, OCR determined that black students are significantly underrepresented in the LRSD's GEP. The district is urged to evaluate its referral, identification, evaluation and placement policies and procedures and make whatever changes are necessary to ensure that this underrepresentation is not caused by any steps in the Gifted and Talented placement process that may be discriminatory on the basis of race. To assist the District in evaluating the Gifted Education Program and increasing minority participation in the program, OCR is providing the following resources funded by the Department of Education in assessing the impact of referral and evaluation processes on the participation of black students in the GEP: Evaluation Assistance Center- West 121 Tijeras NE, Suite 2100 Albuquerque, NM 87102 (505) 242-7447 Fax (505) 242-7558 Intercultural Development Research Association (IDRA) (Desegregation Assistance Center--South Central Collaborative Services) 5825 Callaghan Rd, Suite 350 San Antonio, Texas 78228 (210) 684-8180 Fax (210) 684-5389 Director: Mr. Bradley ScottOffice of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown. Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 February 14, 19% Dr. Russ Mayo Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Russ: In an Order dated July 10, 1992, the Court adopted the recommendations of ODM which were contained in the Incentive Schools Monitoring Report of June 1992. On page five of that report, we recommended that the district \"Identify the factors that are working to make Rockefeller a desegregated school and adopt or adapt them for the other incentive schools.\" Tlie same recommendation has appeared in subsequent ODM monitoring reports, and has also been discussed by Judge Wright during hearings. As the district is poising itself to consider changes in the desegregation plan, and perhaps particularly in the incentive schools, it seems especially important that we know the results of the districts analysis of the factors that have worked to desegregate Rockefeller. Tlierefore, please immediately forward to me the results of the districts identification of the Rockefeller success factors. Also explain how the identification process was conducted, including when it was undertaken, who participated in it, the analysis criteria and methods used, and how the results have been applied to the other incentive schools. Tltank you very much for your assistance. Sincerely yours. LG.!*___ Ann S. Brown CC: Hank Williams Chris HellerOffice of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor March 5. 1996 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 Dr. Henry P. Williams Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Uttle Rock, AR 72201 Dear Hank: Im perplexed by some of the comments attributed to you in an article entitled, \"LRs Latest School Crisis-Henry Williams,\" which appeared in the March 1 edition of the Arkansas Times. Im well aware that the media sometimes dont accurately capture the statements or intentions of the interviewee. However, if the article is accurate, 1 want to set the record straight about certain points you made, which Ive enumerated below. 1. The writer reports that you complained about needlessly prolonging the case by tying up district money in court-ordered programs that make meaningful improvements impossible. To illustrate such a regressive \"court-ordered\" program, you were quoted as citing the example of teaching Spanish in the incentive schools. You and 1 are both aware that the desegregation plans were not authored by the Court, but by the Little Rock School District and the other parties, who appealed the Court to approve those plans. Thus, the desegregation programs are court-approved, rather than court-ordered, a fact judge Wright has frequently stressed. It was the LRSD-not the Court-which promised Spanish to incentive school children and their parents. That fact squarely places with the school district the responsibility for both creating and fulfilling the various desegregation commitments. 1 do agree with your comment that teaching Spanish in the incentive schools has \"never been done,\" a failure we have repeatedly brought out in our monitoring reports. 2. You chose to tell the reporter that you had once written a letter directly to judge Wright. You were quoted as saying that 1 told you that you shouldnt do that again. My records reflect that, in the late fall of 1994, you had in fact written three letters to Judge Wright, all of which she forwarded to me to handle, as is her custom. 1 contacted your attorney, who was unaware that you had written to the judge, asking him to diplomatically remind you of judge Wrights policy of refraining from ex partie communication with the parties. By asking your attorney to tactfully reiterate to you the judges policy of participating only in on- the-record communication, my intention was to be as discreet as possible, hoping to spare you embarrassment. That was also the reason 1 had never publicly revealed that you had privately written to the judge.Page Two March 5, 1996 3. Tlie most puzzling and disturbing assertion in the article is your claim that \"[ODM] never really talks to us before issuing their reports.'II Not only do we routinely talk to your representatives before issuing our reports, we also talk with them before we even begin a monitoring project. At that time, we explain our monitoring guide and procedures so the district will know exactly what to expect before we ever begin. Tlien, after completing our site visits, interviews, and examination of documents, we review a draft of our findings with your representatives to provide an opportunity for discussion, clarification, and any needed correction. Im sure youll recall having participated in such a session in my conference room during August of 1994 with Russ Mayo, Sterling Ingram, Margaret Gremillion and others, along with me and my staff. At that meeting, we reviewed with you a draft of ODMs report on involvement in the principal selection process. You yourself did not challenge any of our findings in that report nor express any dissatisfaction. Im sure you share my frustration about reading inaccurate reports in the newspaper, and that you understand my desire to correct misrepresentations. Sincerely yours, Ann S. Brown cc: Board of Directors CAtris 51- Ci Little Rock School Disikict APR 't^ iviQyQoA OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT Office of Osssgrogaion vioiikar.ng April 15, 1996 Walter I lussman Publisher Arkansas Democrat-Gazette P. O. Box 2221 Little Rock, AR 72203 Dear Walter: Public education has been, and will continue to be, an important concern among residents of this community. It is critical, therefore, that dialogue exists between educators and the community. It is equally important that media representatives meet periodically with educational leaders to discuss the issues which we must address. In fact, the Tri-District Desegregation Plan calls for regular meetings between a media coalition and the superintendents of the three public school districts. I would like to invite you, or your representative, to meet with Bobby Lester, Pulaski County Special School District Superintendent\nJames Smith, North Little Rock School District Superintendent\nand me on Wednesday, April 24, at 8:30 a.m. The meeting will be held in the Board Room of the Little Rock School District Administration Building, 810 West Markham. I look forward to meeting with you, other media representatives, and the other local superintendents. Sir/cerely, :\u0026lt; :nry P. Williams superintendent of Schools cc: Bobby Lester James Smith 810 WcNl Miirkhatn Sirvcl l.ltUc R\u0026lt;x:k, ArkajisaH 72201 (501)321-2(X)0 4- -1 Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 4Pft d J 1996 April 18, 1996 Office of Desegregation Woniioring TO: All Little Rock School District Personnel FROM: Linda Young, Internal Coordinator, Strategic Planning ,^S\u0026gt;c^on Modeste, Internal Coordinator, Strategic Planning THROUGH: enry r. Willi: s, Superintendent of Schools RE: Questions Following the April 5th Strategic Planning Update As promised, we are providing responses to the questions and thoughtful concerns that were articulated by staff members across the district following the closed circuit telecast about strategic planning. We are very pleased with the interest in and positive comments about our district-wide effort to ensure continued success for our students into the 21st century. What follows is a response by Dr. Williams to your questions. We encourage each of you to continue to think about the strategies addressed through our strategic planning effort and to become involved in the work that must be done to ensure that our mission becomes our reality. Again we encourage you to become involved by volunteering to serve on one of the numerous stratgic planning teams that are currenly being formed. Listed below are the lead administrators responsible for the implementation of the strategic plan. Please feel free to contact us or any of the strategy leaders if you wish to become involved. Leon Modeste, Internal Coordinator Linda Young, Internal Coordinator 324-2011 324-2112 I Strate^ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Title Core Curriculum Standards Implement Desegregation Plan Students Testing Below 50% Communication Plans Community Partnerships______ Personnel Policies Staff Development____________ Equitable Delivery System Financial Stability____________ School Safety_________________ Use of Technology Leader | Gene Parker Russ Mayo Vic Anderson Suellen Vann Debbie Milam Brady Gadberry Sterling Ingram Patty Kohler Fred Smith JoEvelyn Elston David Beason Telenhone # 324-0510 324-2429 324-2005 324-2020 324-2297 324-2118 324-2130 324-2190 324-2003 324-2162 324-2056Little Rock School District Strategic Planning Update April 18, 1996 Follow Up Questions And Answers Is it really possible by the year 2001 for average student performance for every identified sub group to be at or above the 75th percentile as measured by standardized tests? Those of us who have taken a course in measurements and statistics have probably come away from that experience believing that this objective is impossible to achieve. Why? The answer is simply because of the nature of statistics. But, the strategic planning committee wanted to set objectives that would really stretch us and force us to grow into a new way of thinking about what can happen for students. This objective is a desired objective. Our hope is that through the strategic planning effort -all of us- administrators, teachers, and support staff-will come together to create an optimum learning environment for all students. The intent of this environment will be to nurture all of our students in ways that encourage them to achieve their personal maximums. The strategic planning committee has identified ambitious strategies for moving the district toward realization of this objective. Specifically, strategies 1, 3, 7, and 8 address comprehensive systemic changes designed to accomplish this through standards for curriculum and assessment, innovative strategies for improving below grade level performance, staff development, and site-based management. Finally, do I believe that the intent of this objective is obtainable? Yes - absolutely. As we work together throughout the district, building on a common belief system, we can achieve our mission. Student behavior and discipline issues in our classrooms and schools remain major concerns for most of us. Where among the twelve strategies are these concerns addressed? These concerns are actually addressed throughout the entire strategic plain. However, they are explicitly addressed in strategy 10 which focuses on the development and implementation of actions aimed at restoring public confidence in the safety and security of our schools. These actions include providing ongoing conflict resolution training and skiU development for our 1 students\nimproving behavior and safety on school buses and at bus stops\ncontrolling access to school buildings, grounds and events\nimplementing a staff development plan for all personnel to hilly understand safety policies and procedures\ndeveloping and enhancing a system of communication among schools, administration, and the public regarding issues of safety and security\nimplementing measures to control drug activity, prevent violence and secure each campus\nand ensuring that student behavior allows for a productive learning environment by putting into place appropriate disciplinary actions that are uniformly pursued when behavior is inappropriate. In the brochure, A Vision for the Future, one of the beliefs is that the family is a primary influence on the development of a child. Since we know that teachers cannot do it alone, where in the strategic plan are parents assisted in fulfilling their responsibilities to the education of their children? Indeed the beliefs that are included in the strategic plan focus heavily on the need for parental and community involvement in the education of every child. These beliefs mean nothing if the community fails to recognize its responsibilities in the education effort. Strategy 8 articulates actions intended to bring together parents, school board members, citizens of the community, and schools in a joint effort to provide a quality education for every child. Implementation of this strategy will bring about greater collaboration with the community to offer more comprehensive early childhood programs. These programs will include an emphasis on parenting skills as weU as a provision for community based services that bring together parents, students, and a host of community resources for the purpose of furthering the education of all children. Additionally, strategy 8 outlines actions to create an educational climate which encourages meaningful and ongoing parent/teacher interaction by eliminating barriers and providing opportunities for broad participation in the learning process. if t Little Rock School District OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT .1 May 3. 1996 0 19^0 OfficQ Of fc... Ms. Ann Brown ODM 201 E. Markham, Suite 510 Little Rock, AIv \"I 2201 Dear Ms. Brown: You are cordially invited to join me for a very special announcement concerning the progress of the Little Rock School District in its ongoing effort to meet the obligations of the Desegregation Plan. The announcement will be made as part of a press conference to be held on Wednesday, May 8, 1996, 1:00 p.m. at 1500 Park Street. We will meet in the auditorium in the event of inclement weather. I look forward to seeing you on May 8. Sincerely, Henry P. Williams Superintendent 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501) 324-2000 MAY-15-1996 09=05 GEVEF SPRINGS FBC CP  50i 5c2 aiS3 F.Ol ^^^Gjzggr Springs First Saptist Church 5615 Ginger Springs l^oad  Litt I p RocL 72209 Ip Rock, 72209 To: Of: Prom: PpIX pages\nTime: phonp 501 55-3474-  PfiX 501 562-4159 ate: o /\u0026lt;4/a 0! 0 '5 Comments: A- .-rj A -\\ 4 * r u. .Aja.'T' I y = cj I c A ' 3 0 -/ - i J I 5 / f s. / \u0026lt; TS-- iTt-- Q. f c ^5 IMAY-15-1996 09:06 GEYEP 3FRIM1. SOI c. 4139 i3. Mav 15, I9Q6 J Two roads diverged in ayellow' wood, and 1- I took rhe one less travelled by. And that has made af 1 the difference. From now on each time I read this poem by Robert Frost, I will think of you - our special Senior Class ot 1996. I will remember that, by choosing to continue with the Honors/AP prouram. you have metaphorically chosen a different path and. in this case, a more difficult one I will remember your perseverance in the face of so many assigned works to read, so many papers to write, so much red ink. ( 1 hope you know that sadism is not part of my nature, but rather that 1 knew you were capable of excellence and that life demands attention to detail.) I will remember your courage as I played Devil's Advocate in discussions and tried to hold you accountable for generalized statements. ( I hope you realize that I wished not to change your point of view, but to strengthen it and that you will be held accountable in medicine and law. teaching, engineerinn, the ministry, business, and family life.) I will remember your endurance as you played volleyball, softball, and baseball, golf, soccer, and tennis, as you ran track and put together the school newspaper, panicipated in drama productions and oratory contests and Superintendent's Cabinet and Mercantile Bank Board meetings. You sang in the choir, played in the band, marched and cheered at every home game and many of those away Some of you worked at afterschool jobs and several endured personal trauma and family trials. You accomplished all this and still stayed through .AP to the end and met all the deadlines, ^'ou have surpassed my greatest expectations. ?Vid, consequently, 1 want to thank you for that and for the new and unique perspectives you have given me on so many different subjects. Some people believe that studying the Humanities, literature in panicuiar, is a waste of time because these subjects do not help you make a better living. I would like to hope they will make living better. You have read of the nature of good and evil from Shakespeare and Golding, of racism and Colonialism from Achebe . Existentialism from Hemingway, selfhood from Kafka, the impact of an unjust society on the individual from Wright, courage of conviction from Huck, the human tragedy that can result from those who blindly follow tradition from Jackson, and the rewards of grit and determination from a little girl who named herself Ellen Foster and whose II. 'new mama\" showed us all what a loving parent should be. We learn mainly from e.xperience, of course, but we define and conceptualize through these things that come from books - the products of long hours and days of thought and editing, visions and revisions, (to paraphrase Ellen Gilchrist ) the best parts of the best minds that have ever lived on earth, your real legacy from the educational sy.stem that no one can ever take from you in any-MAV-15-I99b 09:07 I3E\\E? SPPiriG PBC -11 way As long as there are schools and libraries and free societies, this will be waitinu for you whenever you wish to take it And lire will be better for vou w hen you do Some time ago ar a party an acquaintance ct'ours, a businessman in the community, discussed the wonders of the corporate world with my husband for a few minutes and then turned to me - with incredulity, 1 thought- and asked why on earth I chose teaching as a career, especially in Arkansasyou can guess the rest 1 was stunned and could only answer at the moment that. well, I liked it It was a question 1 could not let go of and, as we so often do, I replayed the moment in my mind. I suppose I\n-hose teaching initially because, except for Donna Reed , June Cleaver, and my own sweet mother, my only role models were the strong, traditional women who tauuht me at Puiaski Heia.hts and Central High School Later I stayed because, luckily, mv salary was not the primary one in our family. But it is more than this - these are the superftcial reasons. If he reeled around at .me once more, if 1 could replay that instant with all my wits about me, I would say, \"Why did I choose teaching Well, it is because of Bry an and Jeremy, Clif, Ryan, and Cheryl, Erica and Ashley, Liz, Sarah, .Alicia, Brigette, and Meredith, Tara , Leslie and Erin, John Paul, Corey, and Patrice, Tamika and Tanika, Dereka and Daphne, Laura, Brandi, Charneile. Amber and Stacy. And certainly it is also because of Cristy and Felicia, Jeremy H. and Jason, Lizz. Hunter, Jill and Kara. Torrie and Angie. Tamara, Aronna, Kevin, Kelly, and Jeff, Allison and Ron. Kerrie, Tametra. Melvelyn, and Rusty.Kisa, Reesa, and Mackenzie. .May the sun snine warmly on your face, -May the rain fall gently on your shoulders. May the road rise up to meet you. And may God always hold you in the palm of His Hand With much love, / d TOTAL P.yZ6 -Sec. yn ee n received OCT 2 5 1996 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION Office of Desegfesaiion Date: October 9, 1996 To: District Biracial Committee Members From: Dr. Paul J. Smith, Coordinator, Program Monitoring Through: Dr. Ed Jackson, Director Subject: Incentive School Program Monitoring Enclosed are copies of the Planning, Research and Evaluation/School Biracial Committee monitoring dates. One list is arranged alphabetically by school, and the other list is arranged chronologically. These lists are provided to make you aware of dates PRE will be monitoring this semester. Members of the District Biracial Committee have a standing invitation to accompany the Planning, Research and Evaluation (PRE) Team to any of the Little Rock School District (LRSD) schools for a monitoring visit Whether you visit schools with the PRE team or on your own, our ofBce stands ready to assist you if needed. Our phone number is 324-2120. I have enclosed three monitoring checklist instruments for your use in addition to the one distributed earlier...one for each quarter. It would be appreciated if you would return the completed monitoring instrument and a team consensus report to the PRE ofBce as soon as possible after the monitoring visits to incentive schools. LRSD incentive schools are: Franklin, Garland, Ivlitchell, Rightsell and Rockefeller Please note that we have also enclosed four copies of the Incentive School Student Recruitment addendum checklist for your use. Encl: (9) Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District o( Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 Date: October 18, 1996 To\nFrom: Brown Bobby Lester, Don Roberts, James Smith, Gene Wilhoit Subject\nODM 1996-97 Monitoring Priorities and Procedures My staff and I have identified our monitoring priorities for the 1996-97 school year, which are listed on the enclosure. As is our custom, we identified our monitoring emphasis by reviewing the desegregation plans and mandates from both the circuit and district courts. We also noted court orders and directives given us by Judge Wright that require ODM to review certain desegregation activities or to scrutinize specific provisions of the plans or court orders. It is possible that some of the attached topics will change depending upon unforeseen events that may develop, such as new court orders. Some of our monitoring will be in the nature of an annual follow-up on previous reports, such as school enrollment and the LRSD incentive schools. A few of the topics appeared on our list for the last school year, but we won't complete the reports until this year, such as multicultural education in the PCSSD. At the conclusion of each monitoring project, we will summarize our findings to the Court in some type of written report. Some of our reports will be brief and limited in scope, such as the extended year program in the incentive schools\nothers, such as that on ADE's monitoring, will be more comprehensive and, therefore, lengthier. You can expect our monitoring procedures to remain essentially unchanged from previous years, continuing to include review of records and other written information, interviews with principals and other administrators, and visits to schools. Our observations will be directed by the same type of written guide we've used in the past. This instrument is based on provisions of the settlement agreements, court orders, or other documents that are part of the case record. As appropriate, we'll review the guide with your staff before beginning formal monitoring to talk over what we'll be looking for and to answer any questions. October 18, 1996 As our monitoring timetable develops, we will notify you so you can plan accordingly. We will try to establish a schedule that avoids dates which would conflict with the calendar of other monitoring groups, such as the Biracial Committees or the ADE monitoring teams. As you're aware, some of our monitoring guides include charts that reflect various data, such as school enrollment and staffing. Because ODM monitors gather this data from the annual school profiles, rather than asking school staff to fill out forms or charts, please send the 1996-97 profiles on all schools to ODM by November 15.1996. Of course, this request applies only to the three local school districts, not ADE. I also want to reiterate that, because Judge Wright has repeatedly reminded all of us about the role and importance of plan modification, my staff and I remain wilhng to assist you in this process as appropriate. If you have any questions or comments, please call me. We're looking forward to working with you during the year ahead. cc: Bobby Acklin Billy Bowles Counsel of Record /1996-97 ODM Monitoring Priorities  The 1996-97 budgets of the three school districts  ADE monitoring of Pulaski County desegregation in accordance with the Settlement Agreement, the Allen Letter, the ADE Implementation Plan, and relative court orders  Academic achievement and closing disparity in achievement between e races  Functioning of the districtwide Biracial Committee in the LRSD  The alternative learning centers in the three districts  Recruitment for the four-year-old program to promote desegregation  School facilities in the LRSD and PCSSD, with emphasis on buildings not previously monitored on this topic  M-to-M transfers among the three school districts  Student enrollment and racial balance within individual schools  Staffing patterns and staff recruinnent for racial balance among administrators, non-certified personnel, and secondary teachers  Incentive schools, with emphasis on facilities, theme implementation, programs, and those aspects of the schools that previously have been cited as needing improvement  Staffing in the Incentive schools to examine hiring procedures and determine the extent of racial balance within employee categories  Double funding of the incentive schools  The extended year program for the incentive schools during the summer of 1997  Multicultural education in the PCSSD  Finance: assuring that use of settlement monies is consistent with the desegregation plans and court orders\ndetermining that the districts exercise fiscal responsibility such that they can fulfill their plan obligations\nwhether money is being wastedJOHN W. WALKER, PA. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 Telephone (501)374-3758 Fax (501) 374-4187 JOHN W. WALKER RALPH WASHINGTON MARK BURNETTE AUSTIN PORTER JR KIMBERLY R DICKSON RECEIVED OCT 2 5 1596 October 21, 1996 jifics ct Mcfiiicriny Ms. Ann Brown OflBce of Desegregation Monitoring Heritage West Bldg. 201 E. Markham Suite 510 Little Rock, Arkansas Mr. James Smith Superintendent of Schools North Little Rock School District 2700 Poplar Street No. Little Rock, Arkansas Mr. Bobby Lester Superintendent of Schools Pulaski County Special School District 925 E. Dixon Road Little Rock, Arkansas Mr. Gene Wilhoit, Director Arkansas Department of Education 4 State Capitol Mall Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1071 Dr. Don Roberts Superintendent of Schools Little Rock School District 810 W. Markham Little Rock, Arkansas Dear Ms. Brown and Gentlemen: This letter is somewhat in response to Ms. Brown's letter to you gentlemen dated October 18, 1996. It is also to put you on notice of some Joshua concerns and requests. I am asking that Ms. Brown share my letter with the Court. First, we intend to be more active in monitoring the activities of the North Little Rock School and Pulaski County Special School Districts and in bringing to the Court's attention the defections in monitoring by Mr. Wilhoit's office.Page Two October 21, 1996 not Second, we are also concerned about the OOMS own monitoring because in substance it does address the treatment, including the quality of education, of the African American students in either of the school districts on a substantive basis. We are, therefore, asking Ms. Brown to consider addressing the problems, i.e., of rules fairness and implementation as applied to minority students, the districts' use of police officers in helping to implement disciplinary rules\nthe grading practices of teachers\nthe testing practices of the districts insofar as standardized tests are provided and assessed\nthe use of means tests for participation in activities\nand, just the general exclusionary treatment of Afiican American students. We also note an increasing tendency of each district to wear blinders to acts of provocation which often result in unnecessary student self protection response. We specifically ask Ms. Brown and Mr. Wilhoit to review this phenomena for the past two years and the current year as well. We observe that the ADE substantially \"doctored\" its report on monitoring last year and did not provide its full report to the Court. We are asking Ms. Brown to look into this and to make a competent assessment of the ADE monitoring with appropriate consideration of the option of reinstatement of the ADE as a party defendant. We are also asking Ms. Brown and Mr. Wilhoit to pay special attention to the situation involving Mr. Hoffman's treatment of Black and poor white students at Robinson High School. It appears that his practices there are similar to, if not more onerous, than what they were when he was at Pulaski Heights. We are prepared. to demonstrate th\u0026lt;at1 h1e h as sup__p__o___r_t. 1b__e__y___o__n__d_1 c_ a__v__i:li bUy.r xM/rr. Bobby Lester which makes remediation of that schools problems more difficult. Finally, we are asking that Ms. Brown not meet with any of you to suggest plan modifications unless and until we are given notice and an opportunity to participate in such meetings. We insist that this year should be about making the plan work rather than, with Court encouragement, about ways to aid you gentlemen in circumventing or obviating the plan through suggestions to which we are not privy. Thank you for your attention to these matter. Sincerely, John W. Walker JWW:lp Little Rock School District OCT 2d ter, Becky Rather \u0026amp; Essie Middleton, Parent Recruiters Student Assignment Office 0/tice of ^Weflajion Dear Community Leader, The Little Rock School District realizes that the transition from Elementary to Junior High is a very confusing time for many of our parents. In an attempt to make this process easier for our parents, we are preparing for our first annual 6th to 7th grade transition meeting. The meeting is schedul^ for Sunday, November 17, 1996, from 2:30 until 4:00 p.m. at Henderson Junior High School, 401 Barrow Road, Little Rock, AR.. Members of the Student Assignment Staff will present information as to how to take advantage of the choices available to parents when making the transition from Elementary to Junior High School This will include how to register for attendance zone and magnet schools, applying for desegregation and M to M transfers, and an overview of our safety and security polices and procedures. After the general meeting parents wiD have an opportunity to visit with personnel from each of our Junior High Schools to determine how they will create a learning environment thats tailored to their childs personality and talents. Opi Houses will follow the transition meeting beginning Monday, November 18, 1996 at 10:00 a.m. and 1:30 p.m. We would like to request that you make your members or patrons aware of this special event and encourage them to call our oflBce for further information. We are enclosing a flyer that we hope you will post in a conspicuous location. Likewise, if you print a bulletin or newsletter, this information ma\\ be shared in written form. Thank you for your assistance and cooperation in this matter. It is extremely important that families are made aware of these and other services available to them through the Little Rock School Eiistrict. Remember, our schools are what we make them. Sincerely, Essie Middleton Parent Recruiter Parent Recruiter ENCLOSLTtE receivf^ Becky Rather OCT 2 d 1996 Office of DesesfegaDwi Momtonns 501 Sherman Lillie Rock, AR 72202 (5011324-2272 F,\\X (5ni)324.2:KlSPECIAL NOTICE TO PARENTS OF ALL 6TH GRADERS For information on the transition from Elementary to Junior High School... LRSD 6th to 7th Grade Transition Meeting Sunday, November 17, 1996, 2:30 - 4:00p.m. HENDERSON JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 401 Barrow Road, Little Rock, AR Learn the choices and opportunities available to your child in the LRSD Junior High Schools for the 1997-98 school year. FOR INFORMATION, CALL 501-324-2272 CF f*5k C./f STEPHENS AREA FAITH NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIA TION (Boundary: Pine to Woodrow, 12th to 20th Streets) 1622 S. Martin Street, Little Rock, Arkansas 72204 (Phone: 663-2962) President: Mazola Johnson Vice-President: Ollie Bradford Secretary: Stephanie Foreman Treasurer: Elder Oscar Bradshaw Chaplain: Reverend Ben Edwards June 17, 1997 received Dr. Don Roberts, Superintendent Little Rock School District 810 W. Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Dr. Roberts: JUN ! 8 1997 OFFiCEOF DESEGREGATION MONITORING The Stephens Area Faith Neighborhood Association would like to go on record endorsing the rebuilding of Stephens School at the original site which was so generously donated by Ms. Charlotte E. Stephens. Stephens School has long been a source of pride for this community and the residents of this area were devastated when it was demolished. At that time there was a promise that Stephens School would be rebuilt, however, no information has been released to the public as to when the construction is scheduled to begin. We know you and the Board are very much aware of the value to our young people of seeing promises being kept. Please do not allow Ms. Stephens contribution to the education of youth in this city to be ended. The presence of a school always makes a positive impact on a community. However, in the absence of our school, this Neighborhood Association continues to promote community awareness through neighborhood revitalization. We are focusing on neighborhood clean-ups, painting and fix-up, weed lot eradication, and helping to make our neighborhood safe. We are aware that Garland School has been proposed for closure for sometime now. Also, we learned that a facility study has been done for Mitchell School which shows that the school is not operating at peak efficiency. A state-of-the-art facility constructed on the Stephens site could support the students from these schools, as well as the students in the Stephens area who are currently attending school in other areas of town. The Stephens Area Faith Neighborhood Association would like to partner with the Little Rock School District and offer its service and support for planning the new school.Dr. Don Roberts May 17, 1997 Page 2 We are aware that the Little Rock School District is in the process of selecting a new superintendent. However, we feel that you will play a vital role in the orientation of the new superintendent to the major issues that are pending, which includes the rebuilding of Stephens School. We are very much interested in the status of the plans to rebuild Stephens School. Looking forward to hearing from you. During day hours I can be reached at 682-4268, or evening at 663-2962. Sincerely, Mazola Johnson, President cc: Little Rock School Board Members yxOffice of Desegregation and Monitoring, LRSD District Judge Susan Webber Wright JOHN W. VV4LKER, P.A. .Attorney .A? Uw 1723 Broadway Little Rock. Arkansas 72206 TELEPHO.NE (501) 374-3758 FAX (501) 374-4187 JOH.N W. W.UKER R.ALPH WASHINGTON MARK BURNETTE AUSTIN PORTER, JR, Ila Fax August 19, 1997 Dr. Don Roberts, Superintendent of Schools Little Rock School District Slow. Markham Little Rock, Arkansas Re\nLittle Rock School District Dear Dr. Roberts\nSince my fax to you this morning, Mr. Doug Eaton has effectively suspended Mr. Wilson from driving vehicles. I believe this action borders on retaliation for having filed a protest on behalf of Mr. Wilson against the treatment described in my earlier letter of today. Would you kindly ask someone, possibly Mr. Ray Gillespie to look into this matter to ascertain the facts. Retaliation certainly should not befall persons who make complaints regarding acts which they believe to have racial overtones directed toward them by their supervisors be they black or white. Thank you for your immediate attention to this matter. Sincerely, John W. Walker JWW:Ip cc: Mr. Ricky Wilson T2:T i6, 6T anti Z0d T00 udid ciH-i a3\n\u0026gt;rinJOHN W. W.ALKER R-4LPH Washington MARK BURNETTE .AUSTIN PORTER, JR. JOHN w. Walker, p.a. Attorney .at Liw 1723 Sro.wwav Little Rock. .Ark.a.ns.\\s 72206 Telephone (SOU .374-3758 fax (501) 374-4187 Via Fax August 19, 1997 Dr. Don Roberts, Superintendent of Schools Mr. Doug Eaton Little Rock School District 810 W. Markham Little Rock, Arkansas Re: Little Rock School District Gentlemen\nxW. Ricky Wilson who works in Plant Services was referred to by his supervisor as a \"boy' on Thursday of last week and XL. Wilson challenged the usage of that term, he was advised that he was tenmnated. I w sure that Mr. Eaton wiU have a slightly different interpretation regarding this matter but I would like to confer with you regarding this matter and the other parties because I believe that this violates the desegregation plan commitments regarding fair and nondiscriminatory treatrnent of empl^-ees as weU as students. I would like to schedule a meeting regarding this matter for Thursday of this week if you are available. Otherwise, it would be my advise to Mr. Wilson to .fl pursue legal remedies for damages for discrimination in violation of the Desegregation plan . plan. you both will recall, my office has consistently questioned Mr. Eaton's genuine commitment to the dese^egauon plan and has suggested that he has taken efforts to undermine it. Tolerance of this kind of behavior, in my opinion, is undermining behavior itself. Thank you for your immediate attention to this matter. lincerely, 't ohn W. Walker JWW:lp cc\nMr. Ricky Wilson I 02:t z.6\u0026lt; St sny 20d t00 waid nyi asxw! dstrfictes' J, Summary of Proposed Remedy Methodology and Estimated Outcomes Fiscal Years 1997 \u0026amp; 1998 Including Federal Participants In Health Insurance Excluding Employees of the Office of Desegregation Monitoring I LEA 6001 6002 6003 County Pulaski Pulaski Pulaski 9999 District Little Rock School District North Little Rock Sch, Dist, Pulaski County Special S,D, State Totals 1 1996-97 State Equalization $40,785,144 $23,335,255 $55,946,194 $1,228,697,744 2 1996-97 Retirement/ Insurance $13,775,834 $4,458,912 $9,585,724 $182,946,180 3 1996-97 Equalization for Benefits $6,072,908 $3,474,619 $8,330,388 $182,953,094 4 1996-97 Desegregation Adjustment $7,702,926 $984,293 $1,255,336 $9,942,554 Exhibit 604  Revised Percentage of Equalization: Total Adjustment: 14 89% $9,942,554 LEA 6001 6002 6003 9999 County Pulaski Pulaski Pulaski District Little Rock School District North Little Rock Sch. Dist, Pulaski County Special S.D. State Totals Percentage of Equalization: Total Adjustment: GRAND TOTAL\n1997-98 State Equalization $12,452,259 $24,407,785 $55,691,010 $1,296,496,325 1997-98 Retirement/ Insurance $14,278,811 $4,006,297 $9,665,873 $191,593,564 1997-98 Equalization for Benefits $6,274,444 $3,607,471 $8,231,131 $191,622,157 1997-98 Desegregation Adjustment $8,004,367 $998,827 $1,434,742 $10,437,935 14.78% $10,437,935 $20,380,490 Exhibit A to DeclarationSummary of Proposed Remedy Methodology and Estimated Outcomes Fiscal Years 1997 \u0026amp; 1998 Including Federal Participants in Health Insurance Excluding Employees of the Office of Desegregation Monitoring 1 LEA 6001 County Pulaski 6002 Pulaski District Little Rock School District North Little Rock Sch. Dist. 6003 Pulaski 9999 Pulaski County Special S.D. State Totals 1996-97 State Equalization $40,785,144 $23,335,255 $55,946,194 $1,228,697,744 2 1996-97 Retirement/ Insurance $13,420,826 $4,458,912 $9,585,724 $182,591,173 3 1996-97 Equalization for Benefits $6,060,672 $3,467,619 $8,313,604 $182,584,485 4 1996-97 Desegregation Adjustment $7,360,154 $991,293 $1,272,120 $9,623,567 LEA 6001 County Pulaski 6002 Pulaski 6003 Pulaski 9999 Percentage of Equalization: Total Adjustment: District Little Rock School District North Little Rock Sch. Dist. Pulaski County Special S.D. State Totals 1997-98 State Equalization $42,452,259 $24,407,785 $55,691,010 $1,296,496,325 14.86% $9,623,567 Percentage of Equalization: Total Adjustment! GRAND TOTAL\n1997-98 Retirement/ Insurance $13,914,580 $4,606,297 $9,665,873 $191,229,334 1997-98 Equalization for Benefits $6,261,708 $3,600,148 $8,214,424 $191,233,208 1997-98 Desegregation Adjustment $7,652,872 $1,006,149 $1,451,449 $10,110,470 14.75% $10,110,470 $19,734,037 12/11/98RI r- Little Rock School District January 23,1998 Ms. Ann Brown ODM 201 E. Markham, Suite 510 Little Rock, AR 72201 -JAN 2 6 1988 ^^^SREGATIONMONITORIHG Dear Ms rown: The Little Rock School District is serving as a local site for a national videoconferernce presented by The Annenberg Forum at Brown University on Thursday, January 29,1998 from 6:00 - 8:00 p.m. The topic is Hope, Fairness and Power: Building Strong Schools in Urban M America. Additional Information is enclosed for your review. We hope you will be able to join us for this opportunity. Please share this information with others you feel may also be interested in attending the videoconference! Thanks so much. Sincerely, Linda Young New Futures Liaison and Restructuring Director 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501)324-2000 1 ^1  Annenberg orum II .- -4 Jr- X 1 a,'t A\nr- . [ i U iXAi -J * x\u0026lt;.. * i i aS\nHow can urban schools be fractured to, serve all children welt? \":  f : How are teachers prepared and  f supportedforworkiiiurban ' Hawdo urban ^ook build cohnec^hs with^rnUii^Snd, immunity? Hope^ Farabi antl^Pawer\" tirnedjtajcoincrderw^ '**x * I Power: Building Jrban America A National Videoconference Thursday, January 2Q, i^q8 I .,^.'^SZrj segoh\u0026lt;tQnar^j Gom^Jxjepa^ 1\nm^pMQi^^Batssec^\u0026lt;^j^tesg^jSW,: Sk F5,J (.Si I. I-r\u0026amp; s QOjintinjties S't FinQ 75*\n'^ A S-^ Hi We encourage you to gather at a downlink site with educators, parents and others in your community to view the videoconference and to consider together how the videoconference might help you launch a series of local conversations about urban education in your community. HROUGH video profiles produced by WGBH, the national videoconference will take viewers into two urban high schools that are on the road to success. Students and teachers will tell about the promising ideas and hard work that have brought real improvements to each school and to its students. Their provocative stories will serve as starting points for an interactive, live conversation about what must be done to build stronger schools for our urban children. From the studios of wgbh in Boston and Turner Entertainment Network in Atlanta, a panel of educators, students and urban education experts will be convened for an on-air discussion about what they have seen in these two school profiles. The group will include:  Teachers, administrators and students from the profiled schools  Lisa Delpit, author of Other Peoples Children, professor of education at Georgia State University  Carl Cohn, superintendent of the Long Beach Unified School District * Jean Anyon, author of Ghetto Schools, professor of education at Rutgers University  Newark Ronald A. Wolk, publisher of Education Week and Teacher Magazine, will moderate the discussion. \\ A Special I UY ipap ion Po Join Pls... S- ^ ?^gsfey-^- V Jr W -iSU  --- r- , . i. A. Hope/iFairness-andiRowerss i\u0026amp;Buildirig Strong Schools irr Urban America -t ,x ** A 1^ ri? - The Annenberg Forum at Brown University presents this national videoconference on Thursday, January 29, 1998 from 6:00 - 8:00 p.m. Local Site: Little Rock School District Board Room 810 West Markham Educators, students and urban education experts from around the nation will participate. Please plan to attend in person. The videoconference also will be broadcast over LRSD-TV, Comcast Cable Channel 4. * '*\u0026lt;uiMMaatK\u0026gt;s\u0026gt;. W LnTLE Rock School District OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT June 10, 1998 John Walker 1723 South Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Dear Mr. Walker: Section 2.1.1. of the uW?l'e\u0026gt;'' received 1 1 1998 OFFICE Of OESfSfiESAIIONMONJTOfiJi^Q \"Revised Desegregation and Education Plan LRSD ssnhaailll rreettaaiinn aa ude.seycxrceaacaittii onnn e education expert approved by the Joshua Intervenors development of the programs. states, desegregation and/o to policies and procedures to be implemented in accordance with this Revised Plan aanndo ttoo aassssiisstt LLRRSSDD in devising concerning desegregation or racial which adversely affect remedies to problems discrimination students.\" African-American This letter is to formally inform Roberts and Steven Ross have to you that the aesegregation experts aforementioned requirement. desegregation verbally agreed to experts of their caliber have in We compliance Terrance serve as with are excited that am writing them to confirm the agreed to work with agreed upon terms. us.  the two I It is my understanding from our telephone that you are comfortable conversations with both of these gentlemen to some is not -in agreement, please notify me as soon as possible? Otherwise, we will continue * serve this role. please some me reason Joshua as soon as our present course. When we have scheduled dates with them to be district, we will provide you that we have scheduled dates schedule. in the Thank you very much for your cooperation. Sincerely, Lesli Carnine Superintendent of Schools cc: Ann Brown Clay Fendley 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501) 324-2000 I I  .,5^- RECEIVED LnTLE Rock School District OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT JUL 2 1 1998 July 17, 1998 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATOM MONITORfNS Mr. Ray Simon. Director Arkansas Department of Education 4 State Capitol Mall Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1071 Re: State Department Monitoring Requirements-Pulaski County Dear Mr. Simon: My apologies for not responding to you in writing, but I mistakenly thought the previous comments of Dr. Roberts and my subsequent verbal thoughts were sufficient. We agree that the Departments requirements should be modified. We have suggested a more proactive approach to student learning issues should be emphasized. We particularly stressed the reading and early childhood issues. Further, we see the issue of student learning coupled with economic and demographic issues as being paramount and a significant state issue. The ovenwhelming social and education issues demand state intervention and monitoring. We had expressed that early childhood assistance, and targeted educational development for teachers would be two areas which research has suggested could assist in minimizing the gap between majority and minority youth. - We look forward to assisting the Department in designing a strategy to maximize the achievement of ail students. Sincerely, /I amine Superintendent of Schools cc: Ms. Ann Brown, ODM Mr. John Walker, Joshua 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 324-2000 .Ill'll' iwi '.**HiKs.\\\n\\ 1 *T\u0026gt;$7*=**V^ 81 \u0026lt; Saie^ry ^cJlt.tJt4/t^ .^'MMKK\\\n\\. ' 3 LnTLE Rock School District J *V3 \nOFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT JUL 2 1 IS July 17, 1998 CrriCc GF ^-SEGREGATION klCWRU-iQ Ms. Ann Brown, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: Revised Desegregation and Education Plan Section 2/3 2.2.3 Dear Ms. Brown: We have extended the current administrative pay system by two new levels. Levels 7 and 8 have been added to the current structure for the purpose of placing the newly appointed assistant superintendents and associate superintendents. As has been previously noted, the changes and promotions will not require additional funds for district leadership positions. We have and will continue to look for opportunities to consolidate administrative and staff positions. Please understand that the rationale will be to look for opportunities that will increase services to children and teachers rather than compromise a service function. We further have indicated to the individuals promoted and to the Board of Directors that we believe the total salary plan should be independently reviewed for adequacy and equity. We anticipate contracting forthat service and are optimistic that a report and recommendations will be forthcoming during November 1998. Further, we believe that by the conclusion of the 1998-99 academic year that we will have accomplished the goal v/hich was established by the revised desegregation and education plan. Respectfully, Vesli^ V. Carnine Superintendent of Schools Attachment: Administrative Sala^ Plan \u0026amp; Placements cc\nBoard of Directors Mr. Chris Heller 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501) 324-2000 Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 August 7, 1998 Dr. Les Gamine Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Les: Thanks for your recent letter informing me about some of the changes youve made in the LRSDs administrative pay levels. The letter arrived July 21, which was just after Td left for a two-week trip to tend to ill family members. Im presently processing the mail that accumulated while I was out of state, so please forgive my delay in responding to you. It may be helpful for you to know that the Court has a history of intense concern about how the LRSD constructs and manages its budgets, because of the relationship between finances, district operations, and desegregation goals. For example, the Court has been concerned about such past district practices as: funding long-term commitments (such as salaries) with one-time or short-term monies\nfailure to clearly align each annual budget with the districts educational and desegregation commitments\nbasing new budgets on the previous budget instead of actual expenditures (known as \"budgeting on budget)\ntop-down rather than bottom-up budgeting (top-down budgeting sets numbers at the summary level and then forces the detail figures to fit those totals)\nfailure to link planning and evaluation activities to drive budget decisions\nand failure to use written business cases (or a similar process) as a decision-making tool to define and support all manner of decisions, including salary increases, adding or deleting positions and programs, and so on. I'm not sure I understand how the information in your letter and its attachments fits into the districts approach to fulfilling its Plan commitment (2.2.3) to establish a uniform salary schedule for all positions within the district, provide compensation in accordance with qualifications, and minimize complaints of favoritism. I note that you chose to set the salaries of top administrators before establishing the uniform salary schedule for all positions in the district, which sounds like the carts before the horse and also could be construed as a form of favoritism. I also note that youve chosen to establish the salaries of top administrators before concluding contract and salary negotiations with the union, a timing decision that could bolster the unions leverage position..August 7, 1998 Page Two I'm not questioning your right to make decisions about salaries or timing. Rather Tin concerned about the district's overall financial management practices. I would be remiss if 1 didn't emphasize that the Court has paid considerable attention to budget management over the years and has frequently admonished the LRSD about the need for a budget planning and management system that will enable the district to make careful financial decisions, effectively manage its multimillion dollar business, and reach its desegregation goals. I would be happy to discuss with you any aspect of the districts budgeting history, including the role of the Budget Specialist the Court appointed for the district in 1993. .Although Ill be closely monitoring the districts budget development and management process and will need further information later on, right now Id appreciate a copy of your administrative organizational chart that includes the names of each individual administrator. Id also like the job description for each position so I understand who is responsible for what. Thank you very much. Sincerely yours. .Ann S. BrownBOffice of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 August 14, 1998 Dr. Les Gamine Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Dr. Gamine: One of the joys of working with the Little Rock School District is supporting district initiatives that are designed as both prevention and intervention programs attuned to the special needs of students. Thats why Im pleased to endorse the Residential Alternative Elementary School for at-risk 3*, 4* and S\"* graders. The optimal application of the charter school concept is to develop innovative, break-the-mold schools that venture beyond the constraints of traditionally stmctured institutions. The Residential Alternative Elementary School will apply fresh but proven ideas and approaches to meet the unique needs of at-risk children where other schools have fallen short. Since 1988,1 have been well-acquainted with the Pfeifer Kiwanis Camp program on which the new school will be modeled. My staff and I have closely observed the Camps alternative program and know that it works: children who were on the verge of failure in schoolas well as lifelearn how to learn, expand and hone their academic skills, relinquish self-defeating behaviors, and take responsibility for their actions. These children leave the Camp with new-found direction, capabilities, and confidence. The Pfeifer Camp methods deserve to be applied in a school designed specifically to turn at-risk children around while their malleable minds and moldable character can be reshaped and redirected. The Residential Alternative Elementary School is worthy of support by everyone who cares about making a difference for all children. f\" Sincerely yours, I Ann S. Brown) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT INSTRUCTIONAL RESOURCE CENTER 3001 PULASKI STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72206 2 1398 OffiCfOF August 31, 1998 TO\nAnn Brown, ODM FROM: Dr. Bonnie Lesley, Associate Superintendent - Instruction SUBJECT: Promised Documents As I promised, I am sending to you a couple of documents: 1. A copy of the Executive Summary of the Kansas City, Kansas, Exit Plan ( ) 2. A copy of adiafi of our Division 1998-99 Work Plan. Wed welcome your feedback. - (t\"*? jIviac,4 .'#) Tm looking forward to our meeting at ODM and to my lunch with you and T  rr-i 1 _ 1-_____T tl-iA pnn^'prcntmn I Liz. Thanks to for your Friday phone cal. I enjoyed the conversation! BAL/rcmOffice of Desegregation Monitoring United Stales District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 September 21, 1998 Dr. Les Carnine, Superintendent Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Les: As I explained when we met on August 31, each fall as the school year gets underway, ODM monitors briefly and informally visit a few schools in all three districts. The observations we make at that time are in the same vein as those of parents, students, and staff as they enter the building to start the new year. That's why we pay attention to the aspects of a school that are most likely to initially impress those entering it, such as the condition of the grounds, building upkeep and cleanliness, displays and furnishings, student and staff conduct, and so forth. This year we dropped in on ten LRSD schools during the first full week of classes: Bale, Booker, Cloverdale, Otter Creek, Rightsell, Wakefield, and Washington Elementaries\nForest Heights and Mabelvale Junior Highs\nand Hall High School. A list of our observations about each school is attached. As I told you last month, overall we were favorably impressed with the condition of the buildings and the many fine preparations for the opening of school that we saw. We intend for these comments to give you, your administrators, and the principals of these buildings the benefit of our impressions. Therefore, as has been our custom, we will not publish or file these observations at this time, although we might eventually factor them into some aspect of a report. I hope the enclosed information is helpful. Please dont hesitate to call if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely yours, S. Brown Enc. cc: Sadie Mitchell Building principalsForest Heights Junior High School We were pleased to note that:  The exterior of the building was well tended and despite a very dry, hot summer, the ground plantings were in good condition.  The shaded courtyard where students gathered to sit at picnic tables and on benches was litter free.  The entryway and all corridor floors were polished to a high shine.  Waste baskets were placed at intervals along each corridor, and no litter was evident anywhere on the campus.  Concrete walls were attractive and lockers were in like-new condition.  Some exterior doors in the older building were decorated with colorful murals.  Stairways were well lit and wide enough for heavy traffic.  The buildings and classrooms were very quiet.  Fire extinguishers were highly visible and plentiful.  The cafeteria was spotless and the tables were in good repair.  Wide aisles in the kitchen facilitated trafiic flow.  The gymnasium was old but well maintained and had handicapped seating available in the bleacher area.  The basketball court sparkled, and the locker rooms were clean and neat.  The media centers special lighting over the checkout desk and magazine section greeted visitors with a dramatic effect, almost like sunlight. The room had well-kept carpeting, educational displays, attractive furnishings, an eye-catching materials collection, and a computer work station that was on-line to the Internet.  The girls restrooms were exceptionally clean with no litter or graffiti\nthe sinks and faucets (including those in the older buildings) were in excellent condition\nthey had plenty of paper products available\nthe stall doors looked new\nand each restroom was handicapped accessible.  The boys restrooms in the main building were spic-and-span, well supplied, and furnished with mirrors that glistened. The boys restrooms in the older sections of the building were similarly clean, despite their age. We also noted some areas needing attention:  The raised planting beds were overgrown with weeds.  The older areas of the campus had serious soil and concrete erosion.  The courtyard where students gathered was barren from heavy traffic.  One stairwell window had a horizontal crack that ran the entire length of the casement.  The cinder block wall at the entrance to the cafeteria was badly soiled and stained, creating a very unsightly and unappealing appearance.  In the cafeteria, the stools were in poor condition and the ceiling tile was seriously water damaged.  In the kitchen, the wet areas lacked mats\nseveral floor tiles were chipped, cracked, or broken\nan oven was broken\nand a wheel was missing from a large milk cart, causing it to tip to one side.  The temperature in the gymnasium was near 100.  Some girls restrooms lacked soap and disposals for feminine hygiene products.  The ceiling in one girls restroom that was located in an older building was badly peeled and insulation was pulled from one section of a heating vent pipe.  One restroom had no identifying sign.Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 Memo To: Les Gamine From: Ann Bro' Subject: LFpcoming ODM Monitoring in the LRSD Date: February 4, 1999 I want you to know that my associate, Margie Powell, will be undertaking a monitoring project in the LRSD over the next few weeks. Margie will be reviewing district records to determine the types of disciplinary sanctions used in the LRSD and the rates at which black and white students are disciplined in the districts schools. I believe that Margie has already spoken to Dr. Linda Watson and Jo Evelyn Elston about her monitoring project. Margie explained that our report will be similar to that which we published last year on discipline in the Pulaski County Special School District and one we will soon publish on the North Little Rock School District. As is our routine, we will share our findings with the district before we publish our report. If you have any questions, please dont hesitate to call me or Margie. As always, we appreciate your cooperation.c.' Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 Date: February 8, 1999 To: Les Gamine From: Ann Browi Re: ODM Monitoring Project We are in the process of researching and writing a report on the LRSDs preparation for implementation of its revised desegregation plan. We plan to publish this report in the spring so you can have the benefit of our observations as the district enters into final preparations for the 1999-2000 school year. Please let your staff know that they can expect to be contacted in the near future by my associates, who will be requesting certain records and documents and also making appointments for interviews with some district managers. As is our custom, we will share our findings with the district to check for accuracy before we publish our report. If you have any questions, Ill be happy to answer them. Thanks very much for your cooperation.Little Rock School District February 25, 1999 MEMORANDUM TO: Ms. Melissa Guldin, ODM FEB 2 b iS9y OffiCt Cr KS6RK.AT!CraSBi,VG FROM: Sadie Mitchell, Associate Superintendent - School Services SUBJECT: Information Needed I have attached copies of the following information you needed: 1. Letter-Narcissus Tyler Mitchell Task Force Committee (P-'Icj 2. Timeline for Summer School (Hi'ltd Suryjmev' 3,  Educational Specification Committee  Education Committee 4. Flyers 5. Summer School Report Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501)324-2000 Plan -L'/cJ i' RECEIVED Little Rock School District MAR 2 1999 OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OFHCEOF DESEGREGAnOMMO^i'CP'^ March 1,1999 Ms. Melissa Guldin 201 E. Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ms. Guldin: I am pleased to share that the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District approved the Strategic Plan 1998 - 2003 at the January board meeting. Paula Patterson and Diane Vibhaker did an outstanding job of presenting the Strategic Plan recommendations to the Board. A special thank you to Paula and Diane. The work outlined in the plan is proceeding on the timeline that was recommended. The District is actively implementing the major initiatives of campus leadership, middle school implementation, and standards based curriculum development in the core areas, all of which will lead to increased student achievement. I have enclosed a copy of the approved plan. Again, thank you for your commitment and support to the District. Your participation on the Strategic Planning Team is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, A LesliaV. Carnine SuperiWendent Encl. 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 824-2000 Cormpldt -C'le.' Correi. + Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 376-6200 Fax (501) 371 -0100 March 12, 1999 Ms. Catherine Ware 7705 McDaniel Drive Little Rock, AR 72209 Dear Catherine: Thanks very much for your phone call this morning. It was a pleasure talking with you. I can understand your distress at the Little Rock School District declining to allow your four-year- old son to remain at Rockefeller for kindergarten next year. Once our children have settled into a school and are happy, we naturally want them to remain. As I explained, the districts new desegregation plan has resulted in the district choosing to make significant changes in its student assignment policies. Tm including a copy of some pages from the LRSD Student Registration Handbook for 1999-2000, which lists the student assignment priorities. As youll see, children living in the new assignment zones have top priority for assignment to their neighborhood school, with grandfathered students second. Apparent, this policy is responsible for your childs reassignment from Rockefeller to another school. As a parent, you have every right to make your concerns about the new student assignment policies known, especially in relation to the purpose and spirit of the Rockefeller magnet program. You may wish to talk with Mr. Junior Babbs, who supervises the Student Registration Office (phone 324-2045), or the Superintendent of Schools, Dr. Les Carnine (324-2012). You may also contact one or more members of the Board of Education. Ive enclosed a page from the districts telephone directory that lists their names and phone numbers. Dr. Katherine Mitchell is the representative from the zone in which Rockefeller is located and Mrs. Sue Strickland represents the area in which you live. If you have more questions or need further information, please dont hesitate to call me. Sincerely yours, Ann S. Brown Enc. Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown. Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 March 15, 1999 Dr. Bonnie Lesley Little Rock School District IRC 3001 Pulaski Street Little Rock, AR 72206 Bv Fax Dear Bonnie: Enclosed are copies of the two sheets of paper that I, as the parent of a Rockefeller 6* grader, received Thursday night from my son. Andrew said that he had been instructed to have his parents fill out one form (headed only Dunbar Magnet Middle School, 7' Grade 1999/2000\") and return it the next day, on Friday. Judging by the number of phone calls Ive received from confused, bewildered parents of soon-to-be middle school students (most of them from Rockefeller), Im not the only prospective LRSD middle school parent who has been directed by a sheet of paper (hereafter The Form) to make careful choices\" for an entire academic year in her youngsters life because no schedule changes will be allowed, yet have received no guidance whatsoever in how to intelligently do so. As parents (including me) have tried to make sense of this baffling course selection form, some of the following questions have crowded our minds:  The Form came to us with checks at certain points in the first 6 categories. Who put the checks there? Did she or he follow the criteria listed on the Teacher Recommendation Form (for students currently in grade 6) that includes an item that reads, Placement in mathematics determined by interest and path that began in seventh grade? Neat time trick. Do we have the option of changing any of these selections ?  Can we elect keyboarding in a category where bold Xs appear to preclude a different choice students and parents might want to make? If not, how long must our children wait to learn this critical skill?  What does exploratory Foreign Language and Culture entail? (And why was that course selected for my child rather than the others listed?) Amd what is Global Expressions? Planet Earth? International Money?  Some parents have been at a loss to understand the encryptions Pre-AP, G/T, and RR, as they arent decoded anywhere on the form.(tijt Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 March 18, 1999 Mr. Junious Babbs LRSD Student Registration Office 501 Sherman Street Little Rock, AR 72202 Dear Junious: My office is receiving calls from some distressed parents of students who are presently in the four-year-old program at Rockefeller. At least one of these students has been enrolled at Rockefeller since babyhood. These parents, who are probably African-American, maintain that the LRSD is not allowing their children to remain at Rockefeller through grandfathering and complain that the district has reassigned the children to their zoned school, which in at least one instance is a one-race incentive school. They say that when their children were accepted at Rockefeller, they were told their children could remain there throughout the elementary years. These parents contend that they havent been given an adequate explanation of why their children are being forced to leave Rockefeller. I have not seen any of the letters they say they have received from the district. Please send me a copy of whatever generic correspondence your office is sending to parents, such as those at Rockefeller, whose children are being displaced by assignment zone students. Im aware that the districts Student Registration Handbook 1999-2000 lists assignment priorities for attendance zone schools, with zoned students first on the list and grandfathered students second, followed by other categories. I assume that this assignment policy is driving the displacement of the Rockefeller four-year-old students whose parents are upset. As you know, the historical purpose of Rockefellers ECE magnet program has been multifaceted to promote student achievement through early prevention and intervention\nto aid desegregation by enrolling racially-balanced early childhood classes and then providing a matriculation pathway for those children through each subsequent grade at Rockefeller\nand to promote a sense of belonging, cohesion, and allegiance to the entire school among those students and parents who, starting in the early childhood magnet program, can anticipate spending over a decade together at Rockefeller. Rockefellers enrollment figures over the past 11 years reflect that this strategy has been highly successful. The schools population this year is 44% white and 56% black, proportions that are far more racially balanced than the vast majority of LRSD schools. Further, enrollment at Rockefeller is at an all-time high, with the school at 99% capacity this year. Clearly, Rockefeller is one of the districts success stories.Page Two I am well aware of the student assignment provisions in the LRSDs revised desegregation plan and the nature of the assignment changes the provisions allow the district to make. In that same plan, the district also pledged that it would not modify a magnet program that is successful. Rockefeller is not an area school, but an incentive school with a magnet program. Thus, its classification is unique. Many of Rockefellers staff members and parents are expressing fears that the district is indeed modifying the ECE magnet program and instituting practices that could thwart the continued success of Rockefeller and return this fully desegregated school to the race status from which it has evolved through much painstaking work on the part of many. one- So I can understand the districts current intentions and practices in relation to Rockefeller, I would appreciate answers to the following questions: 1 Has the LRSD revised its philosophy and policies regarding the role and implementation of magnet programs, such as that at Rockefeller? If so, please provide me with this information and a reference to the Board meeting in which the change was approved. 2. The continuity between the ECE magnet program and Rockefellers upper grades is a critical holistic aspect of the school. The new student assignment policies, as I understand they are being applied at Rockefeller, appear to be separating the magnet program from the rest of the school. How does the district foresee that such a dichotomization will help to preserve the success of the magnet program and of the entire schooH 3. The district has a history of allowing children enrolled in the ECE program to remain at Rockefeller throughout the subsequent grade levels. Is the district initiating a policy that will allow students who start Rockefeller in the ECE grades to remain at the school only until such time as they may be crowded out by attendance zone children? 4. The MRC is responsible for overseeing the stipulation magnets, yet the Committee also publicizes and recruits for the schools with magnet programs, such as Rockefeller. What is the MRCs position regarding potential changes in the districts policies and practices in placing and displacing students at Rockefeller? 5. In the spirit of the desegregation case and good faith with the community, does the district intend to preserve the racial balance that has been achieved at Rockefeller? How? 6. How does the district intend to preserve the continuity between the ECE grades and the upper grades at Rockefeller? Thanks very much for your assistance. Sincerely yours, Ann S. Brown '\u0026lt; Little Rock School District recessed JUN 3 1999 owctov MONHOWHS June 2, 1999 The main thing is to keep the main thing the main THING! Dear Colleagues: What a yeai ! I hope all of you have the sense of accomplishment that I do! The positive opportunities for the school district continue to develop. We have had great individual and collective accomplishments, but the most exciting aspect of the year has been that the instructional indicators are pointing to very positive future results. A parent and a teacher asked me how that could be true. Hadnt I seen the newspaper story showing results of the 4' grade literacy and math exam? Yes, but when we looked at those we noticed the schools that were pilots of the ELLA program K-3 and math, all had strong gains. Staff development has not been universally accepted or appreciated, primarily because of the many failed promises of programs and quick fix elixirs of the past! But this time this very basic and focused approach appears to be just what the doctor ordered. Most educational reformers who have produced results over time have agreed it is a matter of focus-getting everyone on the same page with a standard or basic program. All the efforts of parents, students and teachers, regardless of the specialty, are focused to produce progress on a limited set of goals. ELLA training and the focused math training will continue to produce results on basic reading and math achievement goals. And let us not forget district graduates really had no peers when it came to top student awards in a number of state and national academic categories. Student activities have been a very pleasant surprise. The numbers of students participating grew impressively, and I know this helped to produce an improved year in student behavior. Many of you remember when state winners were most often decided within the schools of Little Rock, and Im talking about a variety of co-curricular activities. The district again has asserted itself with impressive performances in music, art, drama, speech, debate and athletics. With the implementation of the middle schools and neighborhood schools our students and programs will only become stronger. Without question, the academic reasoning for middle schools and 9-12 high schools will provide academic strength, and it will have a positive impact with increased student participation in career/technical programs and co-curricular activities. (continued) 810 West Markham Street Little RocR, Arkansas 72201  (501)324-2000RECEIVED AUG 2 1 iS99 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING Little Rock School District August 12, 1999 Ann Brown Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Mrs. Brown: The Little Rock School District will hold a staff convocation at the Statehouse Convention Center on Wednesday, August 18, to welcome staff members back for the coming school year. Our convocation keynote speaker will be Ernest Green, formerly of Little Rock, who now serv'es as Managing Director of Public Finance for Lehman Brothers in Washington. I would like to extend to you an invitation to join us at 9:00 a.m. on August 18 for Mr. Greens address. Please advise Suellen Vann, 324-2020, if you will be able to join us. I anticipate the program will end at about 11:15 a.m. Sincerely, / I\neslie\\V. Camine Superintendent of Schools 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501)324-2000 Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 To: From: Mark Milhollcn, Manager of Financial Services Little Rock School District i^i^^^^olly Ramer, Office Manager Through^ff^J^'Cm S. Brown, Federal Monitor Subject: Jackie Banks Date: August 25. 1999 Jacquelyn J. Banks (432-66-0119) will be taking 10 days leave without pay during the month of September 1999. As a result, Jackies salary should decrease by $672. 1 would like to have the $672 distributed between the September 1, 1999 and December 15, 1999 pay checks, thereby decreasing Jackies gross from $428 to $344 for the next eight pay days. Beginning with September 1, 1999 and continuing through December 15, 1999, please make the adjustment so that Jackies bi-monthly gross will be $344. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to call.Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 September 9, 1999 Dr. Les Carnine, Superintendent Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, .AR 72201 Dear Les: Thank you for your recent letter in response to our .August 1999 report on the districts preparations for this school year. Im glad to hear that you and your staff have read the document, and we hope you have found it helpful. I appreciate the additional information that you provided in your letter. .As for your speculation that the information may not have been available at the time of our research. I want to emphasize what our reports introduction notes: LRSD staff members who had contributed to our research (either through direct interviews or by providing documentation) received the rough draft of our findings a few days before our report was finalized and published. On .August 3 we hand delivered the drafts, invited your staff to offer corrections or updated information, and picked up their written comments on August 5. We reviewed those comments, made appropriate changes in the report, and then filed the completed document less than a week later on August 11. This advance review of our findings is designed to assure the accuracy and completeness of our reports. How successfully we reach that goal depends in great part on the accuracy and completeness of the information upon which we base our reports. I believe that we afforded your staff a fair opportunity to help us get this report right. Sincerely yours, Ann S. Brown09/17/1999 10:23 5013242090 LRSD HUMAN RESOURSES Sep-17--99 O8S17A cyffice o Desegregation a 501 371 0100 PAGE 02/02 P.02 Office of Desegregation Monitoring United Slatas District CoiMI  Eastern District ot AiXansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (S01)376-6a Fax (SOI) 371-0100 To: From: Dr. Richard Hurley, Director-Human Resources 'oily Ramer. Office Manager '^MinirS. Througl . Brown. Federal Monitor Re: SIS Employee Years Experience Report Date: September 16. 1999 /eJ Please help!! hl asking ODM employees to complete the SIS Experience Report, 1 received questions 1 could not answer. Please clarify (in writing) the type of experience you arc requesting in both Experience Total Years and Experience Total Years Out of District columns. For example, is only education-related experience or is all work experience to be counted in the Experience Total_Ycars? Do certified employees count only their educational experience and clerical count any clcncaT) Ittionally, arc ODM employees to include experience whether in an educational sotting or nol^ the years they have worked for OuM In rhe txpcriwicc Total Years in District column? /es As soon a.s I get your response, we will complete the form and return it iinmodiatcly. Thanks for your help.EMPLOYEE SITE: BOARD STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM EMPLOYEE YEARS EXPERIENCE REPORT EXPERIENCE TOTAL YEARS EXPERIENCE TOTAL YEARS IN DISTRICT EXPERIENCE TOTAL YEARS OUT OF DISTRICT BANKS. JACQUELYN J - 4,12-66-0119 BROWN. ANN S - 556-62-9151 BRYANT. LINDA F - 43 1-8S-S471 GULDIN. MELISSA R - 519-63-2999 JONES. GENE -431-76-14.16 .MARSHALL. NORMAN W - 537-23-3125 POWELL. MARGIE L - 105-34-2770 RAMER. POLLY .A - 432-83-0139 S.MITH. HORACE R - 407-74-8169 I I 27 27 18 23 36 16 23 27 10 1 I I 1 j r 8 24 14 20 4 LRSD INFORMATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT I ( I 4 8 13 8 29 3 4 3 32 12 15 14 2 Saiurday, Scpicmbcr 11, 1999 Page 14 of 144STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM EMPLOYEE YEARS EXPERIENCE REPORT EMPLOYEE EXPERIENCE TOTrYL YEARS EXPERIENCE TOTAL YEARS IN DISTRICT EXPERIENCE TOTAL YEARS OCT OF DISTRICT SITE: BOARD BANKS. JACQUELYN J - 432-66-0119 BROWN. ANN S - 556-62-9151 BRYANT. LINDA F- 431-88-8471 r I -GULDIN. .MELISSA R - 519-68-2999 $.1 / 2 Z2Z -H. JONES. GENE -431-76-1436 k i I MARSH.ALL. NORMAN W - 537-28-8125 -POWELL. MARGIE L- 105-34-2770 -RA.MER, POLLY A - 432-88-0189 I -SMITH. HORACE R - 407-74-8169 I I LRSD INFORMATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT Saturday, September 11. 1999 Page 14 of 144Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 Date: October 19, 1999 To: Debbie Milam From: Ann Brown Re: VIPS Reading Day Enclosed are cards filled out by ODM staff who are volunteering to read on VIPS Reading Day, November 16, 1999. As you and 1 discussed, the ODM staff will be leaving for a retreat right after we complete our reading assignments, so please schedule us to begin reading no later that 9:00 am. that morning. Thanks very much.Volunteers in Public Schools Reading Day Commitment Card j^YESI I will read a story to Little Rock School District students on Tuesday, November 16,1999. Name: Address:, Daytime phone: ^76?- City/Zip:. 122a I Please help us plan foryourparticipation. Complete all information accordnq to your preferences: My first choice is to read to students in  Pre-K - 2nd grade  3rd-5th grade at Fg de/z preference School beginning at am  no preference  I am uniile to volunteer on November 16th, but would like more information about volunteeropportunities with the Little Rock School District. Please return this card to the VIPS office before October 25th by mail, fax 324-2044 or e-mail: sdgei5l@stuasn.lrsd.k12.ar.us Your confirmed assignment will be sent to you in early November. For addib'onal information, call 324-2290. Volunteers in Public Schools Reading Day Commitment Card YESI I will read a story to Little Rock School District students on Tuesday, November 16,1999. Name: Qoec^,e/yAj\u0026gt; -o'. I. .Q \u0026lt;0 X s Address: Daytime phone:. a /n City/Zip: Please help us plan foryourparticipation. Complete all information accordina to your preferences: My firrsstt.jchqjce is to read to students in, Pre-K - 2nd grade  3rd - Sth grade  no preference at 'l. cay School beginning at am  no preference  I am unable to volunteer on November 16th, but would like more information about volunteer opportunities with the Little Rock School District. Please return this card to the VIPS office before October 25th by mail, fax 324-2044 or e-mail: sdgeisl@stuasn.lrsd.k12.ar.us Your confirmed assignment will be sent to you in early November. For additional information, call 324-2290. Volunteers in Public Schools Reading Day Commitment Card  YESI I will read a story to Little Rock School District students on Tuesday, November 16,1999. Ll'iy^Q SrVa/li' an T kdiiess: fC 02\u0026gt; g Name: Daytime phone: ^OG City/Zip:. Please help us plan foryourparticipation. Complete all information accordina to your preferences: My first choice is to read to students in B Pre-K - 2nd grade  3rd - Sth grade  no preference at School beginning at 7'3^ am  no preference  I am unable to volunteer on Novemb er 1'I6ttKK,i bbuutt would like more information about volunteeropportunities with the Little Rock School District. Please return this card to the VIPS office before October 25th by mail, fax 324-2044 or e-mail: sdgeisl@stuasn.lrsd.k12.ar.us Your confirmed assignment will be sent to you in early November. For additional information, call 324-2290. Volunteers in Public Schools Reading Day Commitment Card I YES! I will read a story to Little Rock School District students on Tuesday, November 16,1999. Name: Address: Daytime phone: City/Zip: 7 Please help us plan foryourparticipation. Complete all information accordna to your preferences: My first choice is to read to students in at Pre-K - 2nd grade  3rd - Sth grade School beginning at  no preference am  no preference 1  I am unable tovdunteer on November16th,butwouldlike more information about volunteeropportunities with the Little Rock School District. Please return this card to the VIPS office before October 25th by mail, fax 324-2044 or e-mail: sdgeisl@stuasn.lrsd.k12.ar.us Your confirmed assignment will be sent to you in early November. For additional information, call 324-2290. Volunteers in Public Schools Reading Day Commitment Card 'ESI I will read a story to Little Rock School District students on Tuesday, November 16,1999. Name: Daytime phone: Address: City/Zip: 1.-4'b to.k, AR 12-10^^ Please help us plan foryourparticipation. Complete all information accord no to your preferences: My first choice is to read to students in at Car VC_________ Pre-K - 2nd grade  3rd-Sth grade School beginning at  no preference am  no preference  I am unable to volunteer on November 16th, but would like more information aboutvdunteeropportunities with the Little Rock School District. Please return this card to the VIPS office before October 25th by mail, fax 324-2044 or e-mail: sdgeisl@stuasn.ir5d.k12.ar.us Your confirmed assignment will be sent to you in early November. For additional information, call 324-2290. Volunteers in Public Schools Reading Day Commitment Card YES! I will read a story to Little Rock School District students on Tuesday, November 16,1999.' Name: Daytime phone: Address: 2.01 L. 54-.^ SoluIp. .Sir, Citv/Zip: LiA-VUtor.tc- Please help us plan foryourparticipation. Complete all information accordng to your preferences: My first choice is to read to students in Pre-K - nd grade'  3rd - Sth grade  no preference School beginning at 9 .'On .am  no preference  I am unable to volunteer on November16th,butwDuldlike more information about volunteer opportunities with the Little Rock School District. Please return this card to the VIPS office before October 25th by mail, fax 324-2044 or e-mail: sdgeisl@stuasn.lrsd.k11ar.us Your confirmed assignment will be sent to you in early November. For additional informaUon, call 324-2290.Volunteers in Public Schools Reading Day Commitment Card YESI I will read a story to Little Rock School District students on Tuesday, November 16,1999. Daytime phone: Address:^ e? Citv/Zip: Please help us plan foryourparticipation. Complete all information accordno to your preferences: My first choice is to read to students in  Pre-K-2nd grade  3rd - Sth grade JStflo preference 2 at School beginning at am  no preference  I am unable to volunteer on November 16th, but would like more information about volunteeropportunities with the Uttle Rock School District. Please return this card to the VIPS office before October 25th by mail, fax 324-2044 or e-mail\nsdgeisl@stuasn.lrsd.k12.ar.us Your confirmed assignment will be sent to you in early November. For additional information, call 324-2290.Little Rock School District OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT recbved May 2, 2000 MAM i DMm'Ci'JMO.IITOBB Ann Brown, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 East Markham - Suite 510 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ms. Brown: We announced at the April 27 Regular Board Meeting that we are seeing continuing improvement in I .. .  -- ----------- -------------    \"g wwi Itii lUMiy VTVIllVUUII several critical indicators. During the third quarter, student behavior continued to improve in the schools. Our third quarter discipline report indicates a 21 % decrease in the number of suspensions from the same period last year. The number is significantly lower with only 1,255 suspensions during the quarter. More students are staying in school as evidenced by the decline in the number of dropouts. This years third quarter dropouts are 67% below last year. There were 150 dropouts during the third quarter in 1998-99, while there are only 50 dropouts during the third quarter this year. We might be able to attribute some of this fantastic progress to more participation by the community and especially parents within our schools. Volunteer hours increased 8% this year from 237 336 volunteer hours to last year to 255,937 for 1999-2000. And now for the best news! We had already started a trend the previous year with expulsions and suspensions and that trend is continuing. We are encouraging students to take more challenging courses in order to prepare for college...and careers. Enrollment in Advanced Placement courses by African- American students has risen by 48% from 471 during the 1997-1998 school year to this years 691. Total student enrollment in Advanced Placement courses increased 25% since the 1997-98 school year, from 1,435 to 1,791 this year. We waited to share this trend because we wanted to be sure of the success rate was accurate and that class drops had not occurred in any great numbers from initial enrollment. These are positive trends that bode well for the District and the future increased student achievement for all students. I thought you would be pleased with the continuing progress of the Little Rock School District. Sincerely, I) LeslieV- Carnine Superintendent of Schools cc: Chris Heller 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501) 324-2012 Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 May 18, 2000 Dr. Leslie V. Camine Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Les: Thank you for your letter earlier this month, in which you related some of the progress the district is making. Good news is always welcome! Im very encouraged to hear that student behavior is improving, dropouts are declining, and volunteer participation continues to be high. The increase in the number of African-American students in AP courses is particularly encouraging. To these accomplishments we can now add the passage of the mileage, a most significant achievement that is a harbinger of more good things to come for the district. We at ODM applaud you and your colleagues for your diligent work and offer our hearty congratulations on your successes. Sincerely yours, Ann S. Brown cc: Chris HellerrECsvEC------- OfflCEOF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 501 SHERMAN STREET LITTLE ROCK, AR 72202 OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Junious C. Babbs, Associate Superintendent Phone: (501)324-2272 E-Mail: icbabbs@sniasn.lrsd.kl2.ar.us JUL 2 i TO: Ann Brown. Federd Monitor FROM: Junious Babbs t' SUBJECT: Attendance Zone Changes (Response to 7-14-00 Memo) DATE: July 20, 2000 In response to your July 14'* request regarding realigned attendance zones to accommodate Mitchells continued function as an elementary school, the following information is provided.  The original Mitchell School Attendance Zone has been adjusted to include what was the old Otter Creek satellite zone.  Upon review of proximity and 99-00 realigned school zones, a northern section of the Mitchell zone was removed and absorbed in Martin Luther Kina.  To date (7-18-00), projected school enrollments for each grade at these schools reflect: School (Capacity) Mitchell (298) Otter Creek (351) King (728) Stephens (692) P4 18 18 61 37 36 58 98 37 41 77 97 52 41 61 104 39 37 49 105 44 44 51 101 42 47 52 71 46 K 1 2 3 4 5  Copies of updated elementary, middle and high school attendance zone maps have been provided to your attention.  Further review (September - October) of student attendance zones to address enrollment, building composition and plan compliance within the 2000-2001 Work Plan for LRSD Priorities is being addressed. If questions come up or additional information is needed, please feel free to give me a call. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 Division of School Services Sadie Mitchell, Associate Superintendent received TO: ice of Desegregation Monitoring FROM: Carnine, Superintendent of Schools DATE: September 7, 2000 SEP 1 3 20GG QFFiGEOf DESEGBESATtO?i MOMVrOWMQ SUBJECT: Magnet Schools Assistance Program Grant The Little Rock School District is in the process of developing a plan that will improve the educational offerings of four schools in Southwest Little Rock\nFair High School, McClellan High School, Mabelvale Middle School and Cloverdale Middle School. The schools have decided to adopt magnet-like school themes to focus on academic content and to increase student engagement in learning. The schools, along with the District's Director of Planning and Development, will aggressively seek resources to support the themes. The Magnet Schools Assistance Program provides grants to eligible local educational agencies (LEAs). Each eligible LEA that desires to receive assistance shall submit an application before December 22, 2000. The Little Rock School District is preparing to submit an application which will include the schools listed above. If you have questions, please call Sadie Mitchell at 501/324-2007. c: Junious Babbs, Associate Superintendent - Student Registration Dr. Terrence Roberts, Desegregation Consultant Dr. Stephen Ross, Desegregation Consultant  Little Rock School District ^Eceweo OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OCI I- 5 2000 ORttCf October 4, 2000 Ann Brown, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 East Markham - Suite 510 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ms. Brown\nWe appreciate your sharing the information from your staff visits to the noted schools. I have made copies of the information and given information to the appropriate supervisor for review. A couple of years ago we would have had great difficulty dealing with the maintenance and renovation issues. Today I suspect we will have most of these items already in a maintenance, replacement or renovation cycle. Thanks again for sharing the information with us. Sincerely, Leslie V. Carnine Superintendent of Schools cc: Brady Gadberry Sadie Mitchell Donald Stewart 810 West Markham Street * Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501) 324-2012'ii Little Rock School District  --------------- OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT October 23, 2000 Mr. John Walker 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Dear Mr. Walker: In response to information noted in your October 19*^ request regarding oversight of the principals relationships between parents and students, this responsibility has not been changed. Dr. Marian Lacey, Assistant Superintendent for Secondary Schools, is assigned this charge. If additional questions come up, feel free to get back with me. Sincerely, Leslie^y. carnine Superintendent of Schools cc: Chris Heller ZAnn Brown 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501) 324-2012 Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Marshall, Federal Monitor One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 Date: December 17, 2001 To: Members of the LRSD Board of Education From: Ann Marsha Re: LRSDs Contribution to ODMs Budget As 1 watched the televised meeting of the LRSD Board last Thursday, I noted the confusion among some board members about the amount the district contributes to ODMs annual budget. For your information, the correct amount for the current fiscal year is $170,864, which is based on October 1, 2001 enrollment figures. The history of our budget management is such that, every year without fail, we have been able to return to the district a portion of the amount it has appropriated to ODM for the year. I fully expect that again this year we will rebate a portion of the districts contribution at the end of this budget cycle. cc: Dr. Ken James Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Marshall, Federal Monitor One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol. Suite 1895 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 September 11, 2002 Dr. Bonnie Lesley Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Bonnie\nThanks very much for forwarding a copy of your August presentation to the Board on recent algebra, geometry, and literacy test scores. The results indicate some very encouraging improvements, upon which we congratulate you, your professional colleagues, and, of course, the students. We appreciate your keeping us informed and look forward to hearing good news during the school year. Sincerely yours, Ann S. Marshall ^/ll bt\u0026lt;\u0026gt; Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Marshall, Federal Monitor One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 376-6200 Fax (501) 371 -0100 September 17, 2002 Dr. Ken James, Superintendent Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ken: All of us at ODM join in congratulating you and your colleagues in the Little Rock School District on attaining partial unitary status. The beaming faces in the newspaper said it all, and we share in your sense of satisfaction. Weve been pleased to work closely with the district over the years as weve shared our skills and perspectives, lent our support to work teams and committees, and celebrated the schools accomplishments. Under your leadership, the district has made significant progress that makes the community proud. We look forward to resuming our work with you through the coming months as the district continues to move ahead. Sincerely yours, Ann S. Marshall cc: Board of Directors\\ ,4. Individual Approach to a World of Knowledge February 13, 2003 received Dr. Kenneth James, Superintendent Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 FEB 1 5 2003 nr... OFFICE OF deseghegation monitoring Dear Dr. James: After 41 years in public educati\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"gych_rbrl001rbrcx_032-002","title":"Correspondence","collection_id":"gych_rbrl001rbrcx","collection_title":"Richard B. Russell, Jr. Collection, Subgroup C, Series X: Civil Rights, 1922-1971","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5"],"dcterms_creator":["Russell, Richard B. (Richard Brevard), 1897-1971"],"dc_date":["1996-01"],"dcterms_description":["Contains material related to Vernon Dahmer, George Metcalfe, Martin Luther King Jr., and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Correspondents include Benjamin E. Mays and John Doar."],"dc_format":["image/jp2"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["Civil rights movements--United States","Literacy tests (Election law)--United States","Patronage, Political--United States","African Americans--Civil rights","Legislators--United States","Cloture","United States--Race relations","Poll tax--United States","School integration--United States","School integration--Arkansas--Little Rock","Legislators--Georgia","Civil rights movements--Georgia","United States. Congress. Senate--Cloture"],"dcterms_title":["Correspondence"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Richard B. Russell Library for Political Research and Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":["https://dlg.usg.edu/record/gych_rbrl001rbrcx_032-002#item"],"edm_is_shown_at":["https://dlg.usg.edu/record/gych_rbrl001rbrcx_032-002"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":["Cite as: Richard B. Russell, Jr. Collection, Richard B. Russell Library for Political Research and Studies, The University of Georgia Libraries, Athens, Georgia."],"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["correspondence"],"dcterms_extent":["25 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":["Russell, Richard B. (Richard Brevard), 1897-1971"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"umc_awr_50585","title":"Correspondence and General National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, 1996","collection_id":"umc_awr","collection_title":"Advancing Workers’ Rights in the American South","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1996"],"dcterms_description":["Folder of materials from the \"National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, 1956-1999\" series from the AFL-CIO Civil Rights Department records"],"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["Labor movement","Civil rights"],"dcterms_title":["Correspondence and General National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, 1996"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["University of Maryland, College Park. Libraries"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["https://hdl.handle.net/1903.1/50585"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["records (documents)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1652","title":"Court Filings concerning incentive school funding \"pooling\" issue, fact finding and conclusion of the law, and portable buildings motion","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1996-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Joshua Intervenors","Little Rock School District","Special districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Arkansas. Department of Education","Education--Arkansas","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School management and organization","School buildings","School integration","School improvement programs"],"dcterms_title":["Court Filings concerning incentive school funding \"pooling\" issue, fact finding and conclusion of the law, and portable buildings motion"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1652"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["101 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"District Court, order; District Court, motion for leave to file reply; District Court, order; District Court, Joshua intervenors' reply brief; District Court, Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) proposed findings and fact and conclusions of law regarding the pooling agreement; District Court, Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) second submission regarding ''pooling'' issues; District Court, Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's) proposed findings of fact; District Court, Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) proposed conclusions of law; District Court, amendment to Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) supplemental motion regarding portable buildings; District Court, motion to extend time; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool; District Court, notice of filing, Little Rock School District (LRSD) project management tool  The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  RECEIVED JAN 5 1995 FILED a of Desegregahon Morn1orm~ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DMSION U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS JAN O 4 1996  JAMES w. M~ORMAC_K, CLERK By: .(, ~ \\.t,\\ y,Q f\u003e,, -- v DEP CLERK LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Plainrifl: vs. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. Defendants, MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL.       LR-C-82-866          Intervenors,   KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL.   lntervenors.  ORDER The Court has received the proposed 1995-96 budget for the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM). See docket entry# 2567. Having carefully reviewed the budget, and there being no objections by the parties, the Court finds that the proposed 1995-96 budget for ODM should be and hereby is approved in its entirety. SO ORDERED this 4th day ofJanuary 1996 . fHIS DOCUMENT ENTERED ON DOCKET SHEET IN COMPLIANCE WITH Rl,JLE 58 AND/OR 79(a) FRCP ON I It/ 9? sv_v_1 --- 2 5 9 9 Cht.c k O YJ J;;''1 . \u0026'/ ;41 / _fc,6m1JS1 b l1_ ----------- ----------------- Ji\\N 1 9 ,996 FILED EAS-H/N ~1 1ffl','tt- CAAOURT KANSAS JAN 1 7 199' . t oeseQregation Monitonn~ o Office o JAMES W M ---- ___.. .......... IN---THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT ~T  cCORMACI(, JLERK ----- EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION 0PClRlt LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. v. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. SERVICEMASTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES, A Limited Partnership MOTION POR LBAVB TO FILE REPLY PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS INTERVENOR The Joshua Intervenors respectfully request the Court to afford them any opportunity to respond to the submission filed herein on behalf of Servicemaster Management Services dated January a, 1996. The response raises and addresses several cases which were not raised and discussed in our brief and motion for reconsideration. There is no prejudice to the Little Rock School District or Servicemaster by allowing such a submission. We also note that the LRSD has taken no position regarding wither the position of Servicemaster or Joshua. We further request five days beyond the date of an order granting permission to submit a reply in which to file our response. ,I I' Undersigned counsel is authorized to say that counsel for LRSD and Servicemaster have no objection to this request. Respectfully submitted, John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 (501 374-3758 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I do hereby state that a copy of the via U.S. mail to all counsel of record on January, 1996. was delivered day of  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT vs. No. LR-C-82-866 FILED U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS JAN 1 8 1996 JAMESjW. Mrf\\ORMACK, CLERK By: ',Ir 0\\,__/( \\\\,') u.-Q-. .'- \\.. \u003c. OEP Cl.fRJ( PLAINTIFF PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 1 1 ET AL R~ ~ ~ij\\\\/~\" DEFENDANTS g;.~~~ ~j ' MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL .lt.\\N 1 f 1996 INTERVENORS INTERVENORS SERVICEMASTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES, Offi A Limited Partnership ice of Do.se~regation iv.or.itor;l1JNTERVENORS ORDER Upon motion of the Joshua Intervenors, and there being no objections, the time for filing a reply to the Servicemaster submission dated January 8, 1996, is hereby extended to and including January 26, 1996. IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of January 1996. rHIS DOCUME;tlT r.:rriSRED ON DOC:(ET SHEET IN .,;{)MPLIANCE WITH RULE 58 AND/OR 79(a) FRCP aN -t/lo/'?L ~v t1==- fim _ T JUDGE 2604 ,. . .. -- . . ,. . : . . .. .. - ... : ...... ... . . . . . . . , . . ~ -:. - ... ... : . .  f ilED U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF .ARKANSAS JAMES W. McCORMACK, CLERK WESTERN DISTRICT By: ------\"\"'!:O~EP,-C-LE-RK-LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET. AL. PLAINTIFFS v. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET. AL. REce,,,eo--. DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET. AL. .ltlN 3 0 1996 KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET. AL. Office of Desegr . ti SERVICEMASTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES, ega on Monitoring A Limited Partnership - ~----- __ ...... - --......,.._ , .. JOSHUA INTERVENORS' REPLY BRIEF INTERVENORS INTERVENOR$ INTERVENOR The Joshua Intervenors filed a Motion and a Brief in Support of Reconsideration and Completion of Hearing regarding settlement between the Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") and Joshua Intervenors. ServiceMaster has intervened in the matter as a party of interest since its contract with LRSD is involved. A hearing was held in December of 1995 and the Court issued a subsequent Order on December 11, 1995 in which it refused to rule on the merits of whether a settlement between LRSD and Joshua Intervenors existed. Instead the Court ruled that a provision in the contract between ServiceMaster and LRSD was against public policy and could not be enforced. Joshua Intervenors then filed its Motion for Reconsideration. ServiceMaster responded that the provision was not a termination clause and the Court should examine the intent of the parties as to the provision in question. The provision in question, Section 14 .12 entitled Pending Litigation, reads as follows: Each of the parties agree that as of the date of the execution of this Agreement a motion to enjoin School from entering this Agreement with ServiceMaster is now pending in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas, Western Division, styled Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County School District No. 1, et. al., No. LR-C-82-866. ServiceMaster does hereby release and forever discharge School from any and all actions, causes of action, damages, claims or demands which ServiceMaster may hereafter have, arising out of or in any way relating, directly or indirectly, from orders issued by the United States District Court which may terminate or modify this Agreement. (emphasis added) School is under no obligation or duty to appeal any decisions of the United States District Court affecting this Agreement. Further, the School's liability hereunder will be subject to the outcome (through either settlement, order of the Court or otherwise) of that litigation. The Court stated this ~revision allowed one party to unilaterally escape its obligation without a similar provision to the other and was against public policy. The Court did not address the merits of whether there was a settlement between LRSD and Joshua Intervenors. Joshua Intervenors have requested that the Court reconsider its ruling on the grounds that the United States Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has stated that clauses in contracts that allow termination without cause are not against any established Arkansas public policy. ServiceMaster responded that Joshua Intervenors analogized the case improperly. Review of Joshua Intervenors' Brief in Support of the Motion for Reconsideration will show that Joshua cited the case for the law and not for the facts. The law was simply that a party may unilaterally terminate a contract and it does not go against any established Arkansas public policy. Union Nat. Bank v. Federal Nat. Mortg. Ass'n, 860 F.2d 847, 853 (8th Cir. 1988). The termination without clause did provide for a termination fee to be paid to Union. Union, 860 F.2d at 849. Next, ServiceMaster argued the intent of the parties was to be bound to the contract. The dominant rule is that the interpretation of a contract is controlled by the intention of the parties, and it is the duty of the courts to ascertain and give - effect to the meaning and intent of the parties as expressed in the language used. Les-Bil v. General Waterworks, 256 Ark. 905, 511 S.W.2d 166 (1974). The express language used in the provision made \"the School's liability hereunder will be subject to the outcome (through either settlement, order of the Court or otherwise) of that litigation\" --namely the motion in the school case concerning the ServiceMaster contract. When ServiceMaster entered into this Agreement it was fully aware of pending litigation. With full knowledge, ServiceMaster expressly agreed to be bound until a settlement or Court order terminated the contract. It is clear that ServiceMaster intended to be bound until a settlement or Court order terminated the contract. The Arkansas Court of .Appeals has held that parol evidence is .. . ... - . .. not admissible to show subjective intent of the parties. ThT rule does not allow a party to prove by oral testimony that clear and unambiguous words were subjectively intended to have a meaning not fairly attributable to them. Martin v. Martin, 6 Ark.App. 18, 637 S.W.2d 612 (1982). ServiceMaster cited a case which held that\" [i)t is a wellestablished principle of law that, in the interpretation or construction of the contract, the construction the parties themselves have placed on the contract is entitled to great weight, and will generally be adopted by the courts in giving effect to its provisions. This is especially true in cases of ambiguity in the written contract.\" Worthen Bank \u0026 Trust Co. v. Adair, 15 Ark .App. 144, 151, 690 S.W.2d 727, 731 (En Banc 1985). There is no ambiguity in the provision. The intent of the parties is clearly expressed in the provision, Section 14.12. The construction is that settlement or an order from the Court will terminate the contract. The objective manifestation of intent, not subjective manifestation, is what the court examines. The Court ruled that the provision, Section 14.12, was against public policy and refused to rule on the merits of the case. Joshua Intervenors motion that, in light of case law stating a provision which allows termination, even by only one party, is not against any established Arkansas public policy, the Court reconsider its ruling. In addition, Joshua Intervenors request that the Court determine whether LRSD and Joshua Intervenors entered - into settlement which serves as grounds for termination ot the contract between LRSD and ServiceMaster. In addition, since ServiceMaster was not a party to the litigation when the contract was entered, it is unreasonable to interpret the last sentence of 14.12 to include ServiceMaster as a party involved in any settlement. For the foregoing reasons, the reasons advanced by Servicemaster in oposition to reconsideration should be rejected. Respectfully submitted, John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 BJryiCW:a~lkeru !~ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I do hereby state that a copy of the foregoing d, delivered to all counsel of record via U.S. mail on this _ _____. ___ day of January, 1996. ~id~~ iiw.walker JOHN W. WALKER RALPH WASHINGTON MARK BURNETTE AUSTIN PORTER JR. JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. ATTORNEY AT LAW 1723 BROADWAY LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72206 TELEPHONE (501) 374-3758 FAX (501) 374-4187 . l~M 3 0 ,996 Oflice ot Desegregation Momtcring ENCLOSURE MEMORANDUM DATE: January 26, 1996 TO: Steve Jones, Esq. Jack, Lyon \u0026 Jones, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026 Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Christopher Heller, Esq. Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 2000 First Commercial Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Jerry Malone, Esq. c/o Little Rock School District 810 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Sam .Jones, Esq. \\Nright, Linrlsey \u0026 JAnnings 2200 Worthen Bank Building Little Rock, AR 72201 FROM: John W. Walker, Esq. Richard Roachell, Esq. Roachell \u0026 Streett 401 W. Capitol Ave. Suite 504 Little Rock, AR Ms. Ann Brown, Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Little Rock, AR 72201 Tim Humphries, Esq. Attorney General's Office 200 Tower Building 323 Center Street Little Rock, Ar 72201 RE: LRSD, et al. v. PCSSD, et al.; NO. LR-C-82-866 - ENCLOSURES: Joshua lntervenors' Reply Brief HERSCHEL H. FRIDAY (11221114) ROBERT V. LIGHT, r . A. WILLIAM H. SUTTON, ,.A . JAMES W . MOOIU I - YRON M . EISEMAN , JR . ,, . A . OE 0. BELL, ,, .A. OHN C . ECHOLS, ,,.A . JAMES A . BUTTNY . ,, . A . FREDERICKS . UNSERY. , . A . H . T. LARZELEIH,. ,,.A . OSCAft E. DAVIS, JR . f' . A . JAMES C . CLARK, JR . , , . A . THOMAS r. LEGGETT, t' . A . JOHN DEWEY WATSON, ,, ,A. PAUL I . BENHAM Ill, ,, . A. LARRY W. BURKS , r . A . A . WYCKLIFF NISBET, Jft., ,,.A. JAMES EDWARD HARRIS. P. A . J . PHILllr MALCOM, r.A . JAMES M . SIMrSON, ,,.A . MEREDITH P. CATLETT, P .A. JAMES M . SAXTON , P . A. J . SHE,,HERD RUSSELL Ill, P . A. DONALD H . IACON , ,,.A. WILLIAM THOMAS BAXTER, , . A . WALTER A . PAULSON II, r . A . BARRY E. COPLIN , P . A . RICHARD 0 . TAYLOR , ,,,A. JOSEPH 8. HURST , JR ., , . A . ELIZABETH ROBBEN MURRAY, r . A . CHRISTOPHER HELLER . , . A . LAURA HENSLEY SMITH, , . A . ROBERTS . SHAFER , P . A . WILLIAM M. GRIFFIN Ill, r.A. THOMAS N . ROSE , P. A . MICHAELS. MOORE. ,.A . DIANE S . MACKEY , P.A. WALTER M . EBEL Ill , P . A . KEVIN A . CRASS. P. A. WILLIAM A . WADDELL, JR .  , . A . FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026, CLARK A PARTNERSHIP OF INOIVIOUALS ANO PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2000 FIRST COMMERCIAL BUILDING 400 WEST CAPITOL LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-3493 TELEPHONE 5013782011 FAX NO. 601-378-2147 January 26, 1996 ,/AN 2 9 1996 Offic e of Desegregation M 0nlH.l1111g Hon. James W. McCormack Clerk of Court United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas 600 W. Capitol, Suite 402 Little Rock, AR 72201-3325 Re: Little Rock School District, et al vs. Pulaski County Special School District, et al USDC No. LR-C-82-866 Dear Mr. McCormack CLYDE TAI TUflNCR, P.A . CALVIN J. HALL. ~. A . ICOTT J . LANCAITEft, P. A . JERflY L. MALONE, P. A . M . GAYLE CORLEY, , . A . ROIERT I . BEACH, JPI . , P. A . J . LEE BROWN, P. A . JAMES C . IA~EII, Jft., r . A . H . CHARLES OICHWENO, JR . r .A. HARflY A . LIGHT, , . A . SCOTT H . TUCKER, r . A . JOHN CLAYTON RANDOLPH, r.A. GUY Al TON WADE, P . A . PfllCE C . GARDNER, P. A . J. MICHAEL riCKENS, r . A . TONIA r . JONES , r . A . DAVID 0 . WILSON, P. A . JEFFREY H . MOOIIE, P.A. ANDREW T. TURNER DAVID M . GRAF CA\"LA G. SPAINHOUR JOHN C . FENDLEY, JR . ALLISON O\"AVES JOHANN C. ROOSEVELT R. CHIIISTOrHER LAWSON GREGORY D , TAYLOR TONY L. WILCOX FRANC , HICKMAN IETTY J . DEMORY IARIARA J . RAND JAMES W, SMITH CLIFFORD W. P'LUNKETT WILL BONO DANIELL. HERRINGTON COVNlll WILLIAM J . SMITH WILLIAM A . ELOIIEOGE, Jft . , P.A . l,S. CLARK WILLIAM L. TEflRY, l\" . A . WILLIAM L. rATTON , JR ., P. A. WfUTflll ' I OIIUCT NO , (6011 370-3323 Enclosed herewith please .find an original and three copies of the Little Rock School District's Proposed Findings and Fact and Conclusions of Law Regarding the Pooling Agreement with regard to the above-captioned matter. Please file same and return a file marked copy to us. By copy of this letter we are serving all counsel of record. JCFjr/cf Enclosures cc: Mr. John Walker (w/encl.) Mr. Sam Jones (w/encl.) Mr. Steve Jones (w/encl.) Sincerely, J~~f!~. ,er Mr. Richard Roachell) (w/encl.) Ms. Ann Brown (w/encl.) Mr. Timothy G. Gauger (w/encl.) Hon. Susan Webber Wright (w/encl.) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL .IM.J 2 9 1996 Office of Desegregation Monau1 u 'Y LRSD'S PROPOSED .FINDINGS AND FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF- I;AW  - - -- .. REGARDING THE POOLING AGREEMENT INTRODUCTION PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INT ERVEN ORS INTERVENORS This action concerns implementation of the September 1989 Settlement Agreement (\"Settlement Agreement\") in the above-styled case. The Pulaski County Special School District (\"PCSSD\") moved for an order requiring the Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") to pay PCSSD $167,113.00 in majority-to-minority (\"M-to-M\") payments received by LRSD from the State of Arkansas based on Section II, Paragraph o of the Settlement Agreement (the \"Pooling Agreement\"). LRSD responded to PCSSD's motion alleging that LRSD was released from its pooling obligations by PCS SD' s anticipatory breach. Based on the party's pleadings, this Court ruled that, even assuming PCSSD was in breach, the clauses of the Pooling Agreement at issue were unrelated and ordered LRSD to pay PCSSD $167,113.00. appealed. LRSD On appeal, the Eighth Circuit vacated this Court's order and directed it to \"take evidence regarding the purposes of the clauses at issue.\" See Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, 60 F.3d 435, 436 (8th Cir. 1995). The Eighth Circuit specifically identified the following issues to be addressed on remand: (1) Was the Pooling Agreement a means to facilitate equalization; (2) What was meant by the term \"equalize\"; (3) Whether the \"instructional budgets\" of interdistrict schools are equalized; and, (4) Why is there no central account into which pooled moneys are deposited? Id., at 436-37. Following hearings during which both parties presented evidence, this Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 52. Any other statement in this opinion which may be deemed a finding of fact is also adopted as such. FINDINGS OF FACT A. Background. 1. The Pooling Agreement resolved two disputes between LRSD and PCSSD. The first dispute concerned $2 million to be paid by the State of Arkansas as a part of the Settlement Agreement. The original version of the Settlement Agreement contained formulas by which the State would make payments to LRSD and PCSSD. The final version of the Settlement Agreement converted those formulas to a fixed stream of payments. This conversion resulted in $2 million in state settlement funds to which both LRSD and PCSSD claimed entitlement. 2 3. The second dispute related to M-to-M payments from the State. The M-to-M Stipulation provides, \"The state shall pay the costs for full-time equivalent students who have been transferred to the host district.\" (Docket No. 706). PCSSD argued that this provision required the State to pay the host district the home district's average per student cost. This would have increased the amount of M-to-M payments to PCS SD because LRSD' s average per student cost was greater than PCSSD's. 4. PCSSD's argument was inconsistent with the State's interpretation of the M-to-M Stipulation and its practice of paying the host district its average per student cost. (Transcript, v. I 1 , p. 114-15; Transcript, v. II, p. 125). Dr. Donald Stewart, PCSSD's Chief Financial Officer, testified: I supported Mr. Sam Jones' ... argument that we really should be receiving (LRSD's) average cost for educating a student because -- based on the theory -- well, I'm not sure based on what. It was a good argument because it would have given us more money. (Transcript, v. I, p. 115]. 2 5. The Pooling Agreement provides: 1) In any application for aid pursuant to Section 6 of 1The transcript of the September 9, 1995, hearing is cited as volume I, and the transcript of the December 14, 1995, hearing is cited as volume II. 2Dr. Stewart later offered as a basis for PCSSD's argument that LRSD students are more expensive to educate. However, Dr. Stewart admitted that he was not aware of any evidence that LRSD M-to-M transfer students would be more expensive to educate than PCSSD students. (Transcript, v. II, p. 123). Dr. Stewart further admitted that even assuming PCSSD was spending a little more on LRSD M-to-M transfer students, PCSSD was not spending as much per student as LRSD. [Transcript, v. II, p. 124). 3 Act 24 of the 1989 Regular Session of the Arkansas General Assembly, the receiving district for M to M students may include in such application any M to M students it hosts who are eligible for participation pursuant to section 6(A) of said Act. 2) The State shall continue to make payments under the August 26, 1986 M to M stipulation so that the host district receives its average cost of educating a student for each M to M transfer student enrolled in the host district. 3) When at least one Interdistrict School is operating in LRSD and PCS SD, all M to M payments generated by Interdistrict School students paid by the state to LRSD and PCSSD (including payment to each district as sending district and receiving district), except transportation payments, will be pooled for the education of all Interdistrict School students. The instructional budgets of the Interdistrict Schools will be equalized. This provision does not change each district's obligation to construct and maintain the Interdistrict Schools within its boundaries. The State payments for M to M students not enrolled in Interdistrict Schools will continue in accordance with paragraph (2) above. 4) Beginning the first year an operating in LRSD and PCSSD, $200,000 per year for five years be used by both districts to Schools. (Settlement Agreement 2, 1 0). Interdistrict School is PCSSD will contribute to the pool of funds to operate Interdistrict 6. Both LRSD (Romine and Washington) and PCSSD (Baker) had interdistrict schools operating in the 1991-92 school year. (Transcript, v. I, p. 97). B. Was the Pooling Agreement a means to facilitate equalization? 7. Al though PCS SD originally contended that the sentences in paragraph three of the Pooling Agreement concerning pooling and equalization were unrelated and \"simply happen to appear in the same section of the Settlement Agreement,\" (Docket No. 2101], PCSSD's own witnesses testified at trial that the provisions are 4 related. Dr. Stewart testified: Q: And section 110 11 is all part of one agreement made to resolve those issues that arose after the March settlement? A. That is correct. Q. And the component parts of section 110 11 are all related to each other? A. Yes. [Transcript, v. II, p. 11). PCSSD Superintendent Bobby Lester's testimony was identical to that of Dr. Stewart. [Lester Depo., p. 6 J . 8. The fact that pooling and equalization are described in consecutive sentences in the same paragraph of the Pooling Agreement also indicates that the provisions are related. This conclusion is further supported by the fact that the final sentence in that paragraph begins, \"This provision . ,\" referring to the entire paragraph. [Settlement Agreement II, 1 0(3)). 9. How the provisions are related was explained by Dr. Ruth Steele who was LRSD Superintendent from July of 1989 through June 30, 1992, [Steele Depa . , p. 4), and who was involved in negotiating the Pooling Agreement. [See Steele Depo., p. 6-7). Dr. Steele testified that the funds in the pool were to \"be used for the education of students attending the interdistrict schools\" and that \"the amount that would be spent would be equalized so that no students from either district would be penalized in terms of a per pupil expenditure . . . . \" [ Steele Depa. , p. 7 J . 10. PCSSD came forward with no evidence which contradicted the testimony of Dr. Steele. Even assuming such evidence exists, 5 - this Court finds Dr. Steele's testimony to be credible and gives it substantial weight. Accordingly, this Court finds that the Pooling Agreement was a means to facilitate equalization. B. What is meant by the term \"equalize\"? 11. Both LRSD and PCSSD agree (and this Court finds) that the term \"equalize\" means an equal per pupil expenditure. 12. The only contemporaneous explanation of the meaning of the Pooling Agreement was made by Chris Heller, Attorney for LRSD, during hearings before Special Master Aubrey Mccutcheon on September 26 and 27, 1989. [Transcript, v. I, p. 124; Transcript v. II, p. 14). 3 In explaining the Pooling Agreement to the Special Master, Heller stated: Another issue that has been resolved is that once interdistrict schools are operating in both Little Rock and Pulaski County, the state funding generated by those interdistrict[) students4 would be pooled and the operation budgets for those two schools or whatever number of schools would be equalized so that interdistrict students. whether attending school in Pulaski County or Little Rock. would have the same amount spent for their education. [Transcript, v. II, p. 13 (emphasis supplied)). 13. Dr. Stewart agreed that the Pooling Agreement, as explained by Heller, required an equal per pupil expenditure: Q. Now, if we assume that equalizing instructional 3At these hearings, the parties were seeking approval of the Settlement Agreement, and the Special Master was attempting to determine whether there was, in fact, an agreement among the parties. [Transcript, v. II, p. 12). 4LRSD and PCSSD agree that only M-to-M payments are to be pooled and not all state funding generated by interdistrict school students. [Transcript, v. II, p. 43-44). 6 budgets means that the same amount is going to be spent for the education of students, whether they go to school in the Pulaski County School District or the Little Rock School District, doesn't that mean you would have to build your budget based on an agreed upon equal per student expenditure? A. Under that assumption, yes. * * * Q. In order to have the same amount spent for their education, don't you have to develop a budget based on an equal per pupil expenditure? A. Technically, yes. [Transcript, v. II, p. 43-44). Dr. Stewart admitted that the \"assumption\" made in the above question was exactly what Heller reported to the Special Master was the intent of the Pooling Agreement. (Transcript, v. II, p. 43-44]. Dr. Stewart also admitted that a budget can be prepared based on a predetermined per pupil amount. (Transcript, v. II, p. 39). An interdistrict school's budget could then be calculated by multiplying the number of students by the established per pupil budget. II, p. 44-45). (Transcript, v. 14. The parties agree that the funds from the pool should be distributed on a per student basis but disagree as to which students should be counted for the purpose of distribution. (See Transcript, v. II, p. 41-42). PCSSD contends that only M-to-M transfer students attending interdistrict schools should be considered. LRSD argues that all interdistrict school students should be considered. The Pooling Agreement is unambiguous in this regard. It provides, \"[A]ll M-to-M payments generated by Interdistrict School students . 7 will be pooled for the education of all Interdistrict School students. 11 [Settlement Agreement  II, 1 O ( 3) ( emphasis supplied) ] . Thus, the plain language of the Pooling Agreement states that the relevant student population for distribution of the pool is \"all Interdistrict School Students.\" 15. Even assuming the Pooling Agreement to be ambiguous in this regard, the evidence presented a trial further supports the conclusion that the parties intended the pool to be distributed based on the total number of interdistrict school students. 16. In addition to resolving the disputes noted above, the Pooling Agreement served two additional purposes. First, both districts were concerned that the M-to-M Stipulation would work to the advantage of the other and viewed pooling as a hedge against this possibility. Depa. , p. 7 J . [Transcript, v. I, p. 10, 11 and 20; Lester Second, LRSD was concerned that LRSD students attending PCSSD interdistrict schools would not have resources spent for their education equivalent to what would be spent on the students if they remained in LRSD. 5 At the time of the agreement, LRSD was spending on average $800.00 to $900.00 more per student than PCSSD. [Transcript, v. I, p. 10). 17. Dr. Steele testified: [M)y concern was always that you make sure that the students who move from our district to Pulaski County are not shortchanged in terms of any per pupil expenditure that [would be) spent for them; and that the pattern of 5John Walker, attorney for the Joshua Intervenors, shared LRSD's concern because it would be his clients transferring from LRSD to PCSSD. [Transcript, v. I, p. 25-26). 8 funding for the interdistrict schools would be similar to that of the magnet schools, not necessarily in terms of the exact amount [spent per pupil], but that there would be an amount identified that would be spent for the students who attended those schools. 6 [Steele Depo., p. 11). Dr. Steele explained that the Pooling Agreement contemplated that \"[t]here would be a per pupil amount established\" to equalize funding for the education of \"the total student population in the interdistrict school.\" [Steele Depo., p. 9 (emphasis supplied); see also Steele Depo, p. 15-16 and 23). 18. Similarly, Earl Jones, who was LRSD Manager of Support Services from July of 1989 through June of 1991 and who was also present during the negotiation of the Pooling Agreement, [Transcript, v. II, p. 156 and 158), testified that the Pooling Agreement contemplated that LRSD and PCSSD would agree to a per - pupil budget . for all interdistrict school students. [Transcript, v. II, p. 159). Jones explained that the requirement that the budgets of the interdistrict schools be equalized was important to LRSD because LRSD was concerned that students would not \"enjoy the same type education\" in PCSSD interdistrict schools and that equalization was a means \"to help guarantee that that [would] happen.\" [Transcript, v. II, p. 178]. Jones noted that the 6Similarly, Dr. Steele testified that the funds in the pool were to \"be used for the education of students attending the interdistrict schools\" and that \"the amount that would be spent would be equalized so that no students from either district would be penalized in terms of a per pupil expenditure .... 11 [Steele Depo., p. 7). Dr. Steele stated that the Pooling Agreement was \"based on the magnet school model.\" [Steele Depo., p. 7; see also Steele Depo., p. 8-9). Finally, Dr. Steele testified that PCSSD's interpretation of the Pooling Agreement was inconsistent with the intent of the parties. (Steele Depo., p. 15 and 16.) 9  process by which the per pupil budget for the original magnet schools was established \"could easily be used\" to implement the Pooling Agreement. (Transcript, v. II, p. 159]. 19. PCSSD presented no evidence that the intent of the Pooling Agreement was to distribute the pool based on the number of M-to-M students in interdistrict schools. To the contrary, in a memo to Lester dated September 2, 1992, Dr. Stewart stated: I would suggest that the proper procedure (to implement the Pooling Agreement] would be to pool all funds, including PCSSD's $200,000.00 as called for in the agreement and then to divide these funds equally based on the number of students actually enrolled (three-quarter average daily membership) in all Interdistrict Schools. [Exhibit 343 (emphasis supplied); Transcript, v. I, p. 29]. With regard to Dr. Stewart's memo, Lester testified: Q. So if you're going to implement what Dr. Stewart said in [his September 2, 1992] memo, then we would take the total pool of M to M funds, plus the county's $200,000 and divide by the total number of interdistrict school students, third quarter enrollment, right? A. Right. (Lester Depa., p. 24 (emphasis supplied)]. Dr. Stewart agreed that his methodology fails to take into account two requirements of the Pooling Agreement: (1) that instructional budgets be equalized, and (2) that the funds be pooled for the benefit of all interdistrict school students. (Transcript, v. II, p. 42-43]. on the contrary, Dr. Stewart acknowledged that the interpretation of the Pooling Agreement urged by LRSD is entirely consistent with the language of the agreement. [Transcript, v. II, p. 44-45]. 20. On the bottom half of Exhibit 382, Dr. Stewart demonstrated the results if the pool was divided based on the total 10 number of interdistrict school students. Dr. Stewart conceded that the methodology applied on the bottom half "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_986","title":"Discipline: ''Analysis of Disciplinary Actions, District Level,'' North Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1996/1997"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School discipline"],"dcterms_title":["Discipline: ''Analysis of Disciplinary Actions, District Level,'' North Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/986"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\n  II II I  ft\n.Rt,-, ill \"''1. , JI 2 9 1997 OFFIOCFE DESEGREMGAOTNIIOTNO RING NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL ~ DISTRICT f ANALYSIS OF DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS DISTRICT LEVEL 1996-97 a ?1U1te1e,1L p. p,1e7SfJ?t DIRECTOR OF STUDENT AFFAIRS I NORTH LITTLE ROCK PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS SCHOOL YEAR 96-97 DISTRICT LEVEL FROM: AUGUST 1996 THRU: JUNE 1997 q q  Ref: DIS032 Date: 6/20/97 Time: 14:48:41 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions DISTRICT LEVEL From AUGUST Through JONE l 9 9 5 - 9 6 ================================================================= -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU =========z========== 09 S.A.C. 1052 51.4\\ 446 21.8\\ 410 20.0\\ 140 6.8\\ 2048 455 232 224 89 1000 10 HOME SUSP. 162 62.8\\ 46 17.8\\ 47 18.2\\ 3 1.2\\ 258 109 33 32 2 176 11 BOYS CLUB 334 66 .8\\ 82 16.4\\ 72 14.4\\ 12 2.4\\ 500 200 55 51 12 318 12 E.I.C. 1563 59 .3\\ 492 18.7\\ 510 19.3\\ 71 2.7\\ 2636 560 232 215 42 1049 17 EXPULSION 2 40.0\\ l 20.0\\ 0 .0\\ 2 40.0\\ 5 2 l 0 2 5 l 9 9 6 - 9 7 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ===================-==------------=-=====--=-==================--- 09 S.A.C. 1264 52.l\\ 553 22.8\\ 469 19.3\\ 142 5.8\\ 2428 508 271 250 84 1113 10 HOME SUSP. 587 62.7\\ 207 22. l\\ 125 13.4\\ 17 1.8\\ 936 296 118 76 10 500 11 BOYS CLUB 357 58.7\\ 146 24.0\\ 85 14.0\\ 20 3.3\\ 608 200 95 66 20 381 12 E.I.C. 154 70 .3\\ 30 13.7% 32 14.6% 3 1.4% 219 65 12 14 2 93 17 EXPULSION 3 30. 0% 7 70.0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 10 3 7 0 0 10 COMPARISON ====================================================------------------ -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU ====================--------------=-===-=-==========------------------ 09 S.A.C. 212 20.2 \\ 107 24.0 \\ 59 14.4 \\ 2 1.4 \\ 380 53 39 26 5- 113 10 HOME SUSP. 425 262.3 \\ 161 350.0 \\ 78 166.0 \\ 14 466.7 \\ 678 187 85 44 8 324 11 BOYS CLUB 23 6.9 \\ 64 78.0 \\ 13 18.l \\ 8 66.7 \\ 108 0 40 15 8 63 12 E.I.C. 1409- 90.1-\\ 462- 93.9-\\ 478- 93.7-\\ 68- 95.8-\\ 2417- 495- 220- 201- 40- 956- 17 EXPULSION l 50.0 \\ 6 600.0 \\ 0 . 0 \\ 2- 100.0-\\ 5 l 6 0 2- 5 - Ref: DIS032 Date : 6 / 2 0/ 9 7 Time: 14:48:46 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions ELEMENTARY K-6 From AUGUST Through JUNE 1 9 9 5 - 9 6 =============================a===-===================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU =====================s===a============= 09 S.A.C. 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 130 63.4\\ 35 17.1% 39 19.0\\ 1 .5\\ 205 84 24 25 1 134 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E.I.C. 1562 59.3\\ 492 18.7\\ 510 19.4\\ 71 2.7\\ 2635 559 232 215 42 1048 17 EXPULSION 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 9 6 - 9 7 ===================----=-=========------=======---============= -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ======================------------===----=====-------=--=-----=== 09 S.A.C. 0 .O\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 456 61. 6\\ 170 23.0\\ 102 13.8\\ 12 1. 6\\ 740 243 99 62 9 413 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E.I.C. 154 70.3\\ 30 13.7\\ 32 14.6\\ 3 1.4\\ 219 65 12 14 2 93 17 EXPULSION 2 100.0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 2 2 0 0 0 2 COMPARISON ======================---===============================-----------== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU ===================----------===-=============-===--======--------- 09 S.A.C. 0 . 0 \\ 0 . 0 \\ 0 . 0 \\ 0 . 0 \\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 HOME SUSP. 326 250.8 \\ 135 385.7 \\ 63 161.5 \\ 11 1100.0 \\ 535 159 75 37 8 279 11 BOYS CLUB 0 . 0 \\ 0 . 0 \\ 0 . 0 \\ 0 . 0 \\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 E.I.C. 1408- 90.1-\\ 462- 93.9-\\ 478- 93.7-\\ 68- 95.8-\\ 2416- 494- 220- 201- 40- 955- 17 EXPULSION 2 200.0 \\ 0 . 0 \\ 0 . 0 \\ 0 . 0 \\ 2 2 0 0 0 2 Ref: DIS032 Date: 6/20/97 Time: 14:48:51 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions MIDDLE SCHOOLS From AUGUST Through JUNE 1 9 9 5 - 9 6 ===========================---================--===========-----======= -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REP PCT/TOT # REP PCT/TOT # REP PCT/TOT # REP PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU =====-=====---------------------------------------------------------------- 09 S.A.C. 582 52.3\\ 257 23 .1\\ 218 19.6\\ 55 4.9\\ 1112 235 127 114 37 513 10 HOME SUSP. 21 60.0\\ 8 22.9\\ 6 17.1\\ 0 .0\\ 35 16 6 5 0 27 11 BOYS CLUB 165 61. 8\\ 56 21.0\\ 40 15.0\\ 6 2.2\\ 267 98 33 26 6 163 12 E.I.C. 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .O\\ 2 100.0\\ 2 0 0 0 2 2 ==~===============------------------------------=----------===---------=- 1 9 9 6 - 9 7 =======================--------------==============================-- -----BM------ -----BP------ -----NBM----- -----NBP----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REP PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ====================a=================== 09 S.A.C. 595 49.8\\ 289 24.2% 250 20.9% 60 5.0\\ 1194 225 133 136 34 528 10 HOME SUSP. 48 59.3% 14 17.3% 14 17.3% 5 6.2\\ 81 17 5 7 1 30 11 BOYS CLUB 165 52.2% 86 27.2% 52 16.5\\ 13 4.1\\ 316 85 52 40 13 190 12 E.I.C. 0 .0\\ 0 .051\n0 .051\n0 .0\\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 .051\n0 .0\\ 2 1 1 0 0 2 COMPARISON ===================----------=-======================----------------- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REP PCT(+/-) # REP PCT(+/-) # REP PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU ==========z================================z==aacaaaam== 09 S.A.C. 13 2.2 51\n32 12.5 51\n32 14. 7 \\ 5 9.1 \\ 82 10- 6 22 3- 15 10 HOME SUSP. 27 128.6 51\n6 75.0 51\n8 133.3 51\n5 500.0 \\ 46 1 1- 2 1 3 11 BOYS CLUB 0 .0 51\n30 53.6 51\n12 30.0 51\n7 116.7 \\ 49 13- 19 14 7 27 12 E.I.C. 0 . 0 51\n0 . 0 \\ 0 . 0 51\n0 . 0 \\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 1 100.0 51\n1 100.0 51\n0 . 0 51\n2- 100.0-\\ 0 1 1 0 2- 0 Ref: DIS032 Date: 6/20/97 Time: 14:48:56 Analysis of Disciplinary Action~ HIGH SCHOOLS From AUGUST Through JUNE 1 9 9 5 - 9 6 ===========================a=z================================= -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU =====--=-===--------------------------------------------=----------------- 09 S.A.C. 470 50.2\\ 189 20.2\\ 192 20.5\\ 85 9 .1!15 936 220 105 110 52 487 10 HOME SUSP. 10 58.B!i 3 17.6\\ 2 11.8\\ 2 11. 8\\ 17 8 3 2 1 14 11 BOYS CLUB 169 72. 5\\ 26 11. 2\\ 32 13.7\\ 6 2.6\\ 233 102 22 25 6 155 12 E.I.C. 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 2 66.7\\ 1 33.3\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 3 2 1 0 0 3 1 9 9 6 - 9 7 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ============================ss=================================== 09 S.A.C. 669 54.2\\ 264 21.4\\ 219 17. 7\\ 82 6.6\\ 1234 283 138 114 so 585 10 HOME SUSP. 83 72.2\\ 23 20.0\\ 9 7.8\\ 0 .0\\ 115 36 14 7 0 57 11 BOYS CLUB 192 65.8\\ 60 20.5\\ 33 11.3\\ 7 2.4\\ 292 115 43 26 7 191 12 E.I.C. 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 0 .0\\ 6 100.0\\ 0 .0\\ 0 .0\\ 6 0 6 0 0 6 COMPARISON =================================================================-====--= -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU ====================z=========z================================= 09 S.A.C. 199 42.3 \\ 75 39. 7 \\ 27 14.1 \\ 3- 3.5-\\ 298 63 33 4 2- 98 10 HOME SUSP. 73 730.0 \\ 20 666.7 \\ 7 350.0 \\ 2- 100.0-\\ 98 28 11 5 1- 43 11 BOYS CLUB 23 13. 6 \\ 34 130. 8 \\ 1 3.1 \\ 1 16.7 \\ 59 13 21 1 1 36 12 E.I.C. 0 .0 \\ 0 . 0 \\ 0 . 0 \\ 0 . 0 \\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 EXPULSION 2- 100.0-\\ 5 500.0 \\ 0 .0 \\ 0 . 0 \\ 3 2- 5 0 0 3 J l. 4E ~.c ':'.E. Analysis of Disciolinary Action5 by Schoel F~om r\\UGUST NOPTH LITTLE ROC~ HIGH ThroJgh JUNE SCHOOL - 11/12 ==========-===-=====-------------------------------------------------------- l 9 9 5 - 9 6 ~=============-==-------------------------------------------------------------- ----B~------ -----E~------ -----NBM----- ~ REF PCT/TOT # H~r ~Cl/iUi # H~~ ~Cl/iUi # E:Tt_: # STU # STL! -----NBr----\nc Her !-'CI/ I u\n~ STU ============----=-==---------====---------------------------------------------- 192 101 ::. 1. ,_. u 1 59. 61. 81. 81/. .o-.,.\n50. 0% 40 30 0 0 l i :..996-97 i2. 4'1/. 4. 1 '1/. 0/. SC!. 01/. 76 46 i 1  C: .L ...: C 0 Q 23. 6i: 12. 3o/: oz i4 ii. u l 0 0 0 322 i85 1 i i22 6/ Q 0 2 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----BM------ -----BF------ # R~F PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU -----r,JB M----- # REF PCT/TOT # STiJ -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # STU =====================================--===---=-=========-----------------=---- 44 - I 1 '1'\". - :.-.._:!:: q 0 0 0 ., :. bO. Oi: 15. .8 ,.\n60 42 C: 0 0 0 0 C, 2i. 11/. 0 ., t. 20 14 0 0 i 0 0 C C, i. 1. 0 ., t. 284 184 Oi'. 5 5 Bi: 57 50 Oi: 0 0 Ur.,\n. c~.. 2 -------===========-----------------------------------====-----==-============-= C IJMP AR I SOI\\: -----------=-~------------------------------------=====----------=========--- -----BM------ -----er------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- ~ RE~ PCT!+/-\n# RE~ PCT!~/-1 # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+t-l\n:.: STU # STU # STU --- ---- --=-=====-~=-========================================================= . .. - , .. _:_:~ 32- r, \n_, .,_ l 00 (,-1: 2 200 0 i: :.., 0 '% u 16- 4- 1- i- 8- 3- 0 0 0 0 100. 0-'i. c:\n.--, ._,._J, 0 1: 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4~ 9 0 0 0 0 '1/. 38- 1- '1/.. 6- 4- ,\n. 65- 17- I. 0 0 1: 0 0 r:50325 Analysis cf Disciplinary Act1on5 e o/20/9- by School 14.4~-o~ From AUGUST Through JUNE :~ool ~1~ N  FTH ~ITTLE ROCK HIGH SCHOOL - 09/10 :=====----====------------------------------------------------------------=--- ==========--=======------------------------------------------------------------ -----un------- -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NEr----# REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT w ~iv # STU # STU # STU ----=======----========---=========-------------------------------------------- - C: I C C::X:F'iJ:..I.D.SN 278 123 65 52 0 1 6i. 3'i. . O'i. 100. Oi\"\ni49 75 i 2i 17 0 0 0 u 24. 3i~ i 8. 9i: . 0'1/. 116 65 i 1 i7 15 0 0 0 0 33. 3}. . Oi'. 71 5 5 0 0 0 0 . Oo/. 6i4 305 .-. .\niii 89 0 0 1 1 =~=================-============-=========--============-=-----------=======- HOr-E: SUSF l 9 9 6 - 9 7 -----BM------ ~ rU:::i- !-'C I / i U ! # E,TU 481 i78 C i5l C 64. 8% -----BF------ # REF PCTiTOT # STU 2i8 99 3 3 51 0 C 4 4 33. Jo/. -----NBM----~ H!::r- 1-'C I/ I U ! # STU i48 67 0 0 19 0 C 0 C iO. 7% . 01/. . Oo/. -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # STU 62 36 0 [1 0 6 0 0 0 0 6. 2. 8/~ 0% 6:,: o:,~ 01/. 909 380 9 9 233 141 0 0 4 4 --------====-=--------------------------=----=---============================== COMPARISON ---------------------------------------------------========================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----# REF PCT(+/-l # REF PCTl~/-l # REF PCT(~/-l # REF PCT(+/-l ~ STU # STU # STU # STU -------------- ------=-=-===--====-============================================= 20:\n55 5 73 0 '1/. 500 0 /. 122 1 /\n1 0C o-:-\n6:::, 24 4 4 4=-3 '1/. 200 0 '1/. 142 9 /. 0 l. 400 0\n. 32 27 6 ,~ 2 1- 100. 0-~-: 1- 8 4 0 0 0 0 ,. . 0 l: 9- 1~, c:... 7-i: 295 6- 75 0 0 ,. 6 0 6 1 20. 0 I. . '\")'\") i c:..e. 1 52 t_) 0 l. 0 0 0 CJ C i: 3 0 3 6/20/97 Analysis of Dis~iplinary Actions by School 14 49:0~ From AUGUST Through JUNE 020 ARGENTA ACADEMY =====------------------------------------------------------------------------ i 9 9 5 - 9 6 ----=---======----------------------------------------------------------------- -----BM------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU -----BF------ ----~NBi'i----# REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU -----J\\iBF----- ,, ,..._ ... ,...,..._ ......,.... ...,.. ~ \"'1\".~i !Ll/!U! # STU -===================---------=====-=-=----------------------------------------- S A ::. EX:PULSIDN 0 u 0 C C, 0 O\nI . 0'1/. 1 9 9 6 - 9 7 o\n,\n0 G Oi\n0 0 0'1/. 0 0 Oi: 0 0 0'1/. 0 0 0% 0% O'i. 0 C, O'.i. 0'1/. 0 0 -==--===========----===-==--==========--=------==========----------==-======== - I - -----BM------ # REF PCT/TOT # ST~,: 45 71. 4'1/. Ji i 50. O'i. u -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # STU 3 3 29 i 1 0 0 0 0 0 4. Bo/. i 5. Bo/. -----NBM----: if REF PCT/TOT # STU 15 i l 24 i5 i i 0 0 0 0 i3. i Z 50. Oo/. 01/. . 01. -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # STU 0 o\n,: 0 5 2. 7, \" I. i 0 O'i. 0 0 Oo/. 0 0 O'i. 0 63 45 183 7'1 , C. 2 2 0 0 0 0 .:====,===============~\n~\n:\n~=====================================-===-------  -------------------------------------------------=--==-========-============== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- ii # RE~ ~CT(+/-l # REF PCT(+/-l # REF PCT(+/-l # REF PCT(+1-l ~ S70 # STU # STU # STU ~--=-========================================================================== Ill ~ .. - '-L.'_)Jj 45 .31 125 45 L' u 4500. 0 '1/. 12500. C i~ 100. 0 ,. 0 i: 0 '1/. 3 2a:\n11 I..' '.) 0 300 ..,,...~.. - c.. '-fUV 0 i: 0 1/. 0 i: 0 i: 15 l 1 24 15 i 1 V 0 0 0 1500. 2400. 100. 0 i: 0 0 i: 63 0 45 0 1/. 5 500. 0 i: 183 1 72 0 i: 0 0 '1/. ~, C. 0 -, c::.. 0 i: 0 0 I. 0 0 0 0 i. 0 0 ,. 0 '-' 0 I: IS0322 e. a/.20./9...,. 14 49: 11 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST LA~~W  D MIDDLE SCHOOL Through JUNE =====--======---------------------------------------------------------------- 1 9 9 5 - 9 6 =--------=-=====--------------------------------------------------------------- -----BM------ -----B~------ # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU -----+m r-1----# REF PCT/TOT # STU ff RE~ ?CT/TOT # STLi ~------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BCJy~. Ci....UB i -=~-  . _J._, 47 2S 0 C, 0 0 79. 7'i. 36 28 i i 5 4 0 0 0 0 50. 01: . 0'1/. . 0'1/. i 9 9 6 - 9 7 -----Hi------ ' Hl::t- !-'CI I I U I # STU -----BF------ # Hl::r !-'CI I I U ! # STU 39 27 0 0 I 5 0 0 0 0 ii. 9i'. -----NEM----: it Hl::t- !-'C I/ I U ! # STU ./!. ,. , o: .J.. , I ~ ,:.} (i 0 04] ? 1 . Oi'. 0 1 100. 0\n. 1 -----NEF----# Hl::!- !-'CI I I U ! # STU 214 12.:\nC: 2 59 37 0 0 1 1 -==:===============--==--=--================================-==--=-=========== S A C E .i .... 124 C u l 49. 81/. 100. 0% 58. 3o/~ 64 40 0 0 19 14 ,:::, 0 0 0 . 01/. . 0% 52 39 0 0 6 3 0 u 0 0 20. 9i~ 9 3. 61/. 249 :\ni42 . 01. 0 Oi: 1 0 i iO. 01/. 0 0o/~ 60 0 40 . 0% 0 0'1/. 0 0 0 . 0% 0 0'1/. i 0 1 ---------------------------------------------------============================= II C OMPAR I smJ -------------------------------------------------============================ -----HM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----# REF PCTl+/-l # REF PCT!~/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STv # STiJ . STU # STU -----~---------------=-======================================================== 11- 13- S.)SP   . 0 '1/. 25 lOO O i\n25 12 1- 1- 0 I_) ,_. 77 8 i: 100 0-1/. 280 0 i\n0 ,._ . 0 i: 13 12 0 0 1- 2- 0 0 0 i) 5 125. 0 i: 35 2 13 . 0 i: 0 0 I. 1- 0 1- 14. 3-i\nV-~ 0 i: 1 0 3 . 0 i~ 0 0 ,-. 0 0 0 . 0 .1. 1- 100. 0-i: 0 i- 0 e i. ... e. ....., .... ...._. __ -.. '_,' ,._,,._ ..,._...,._. __ 6/20/97 14:49: ,:.9 Analysis cf Disciplinary ~c~1cn~ by School Through ._.,,iUNE --------====----------------------------------------------------------------- i~9~-96 ==========--=------------------------------------------------------------------ -----B~------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NB~----* H~~ ~C!/!U! # REF PCT/TOT w H~~ ~C!/!U! # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU -~----------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -= -.:.. .-.:. 295 l i 7i 42 0 50. 4'1/. 54. 6% . 01/. i58 67 0 39 22 0 0 u 27. O'i. 30. 0% . 0% . 0% 99 48 0 0 i6 1 i 0 0 0 u i 6. 9o/~ i2. 31/. 33 22 0 C..' 4 4 i 0 1 i 5. 6/~ 3. i '/ iOO. 0% 585 242 i i i30 79 0 0 i i ===~====================~==============---------------=-----------------=---- i 9 9 6 - 9 7 =======~===-====------------------------------------------------------------- -----B:-~-----# REr\" PCT/TOT # STU _____ .'[.j ,_,_ ____ _ # REi='P\" CT/TOT # STU -----NBM----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -----~JB F ----# REF PCT/TOT # STU ===~==========================================----=======---------=-----=-=== IIIH  l'E SUSP 11:::, 1 4_\nC) 51. 21. 55. u~ . 01/. 176 1 1 40 27 0 l 25. 01/. 50. l.J/. 23. ,, /. 126 62 0 0 2e. II\"\nc..c.. 0 c, C, C.: 17 15. 9 ., 1. 41 5. 8 ., I. 703 21 272 o,: 0 Oi: C: 0 C: 4i: 10 5. 9i: 169 10 99 Oi\n0 Oi: 0 0 0 Oi\n0 0 ., I. 1 0 1 --=\"\"'''\" _~ ~============O=M=AP:R: I SON================================================ -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- ~ REF ~CT(~/-) # REF PCT(~/-)# REF PCTl+/-l # REF PCT(+/-1 ~ STU # STU # STU # STU =------=-----------============================================================ .. - II :Cl~::= Ct 22. 0 Z . 0 1/. 31 0 fl/ - - - - - _, II iE 6 l 0 :i 100 0\n2 6 'i.. 0 'i. 14 0 0 iO i l 0 0 0 0 27. 3 i~ 8 24. ., c.. ~~ 118 1- 30 . 0 '1/. 0 0 1/. 1 0 1 62. 5 '1/. 6 i 50. 0 '1/. 39 6 20 . 0 '1/. 0 0 ,: 0 0 0 . 0 i. 1- 100 . 0-i: 0 ,_ 0 Analysis cf Disciplinary Actions 6/20/9--:' Dy Schcol F:'cm AUGl....'ST Thro L! g h ,JUN - fl::: C: .!.. ========--========----------------------------------------------------------- 99!:--96 =======------------------------------------------------------------------------ -----BM------ -----BF------ # Ht~ ~Cl/!U! ~ Htr ~C!/IU! # STU # STU -----NBM----# Ktr ~Cl/!UI # STU -----NBF----- # STLi =========--------===----------------------------------------------------------- i43 63 .:-:,.i. ..i,C...\n..C,,  46 0 63 3::: i2 8 0 0 i 9 9 6 - 9 7 79 38 l i6 9 u 0 u 0 '.,-.,: : i8 0 2 0 0 303 i49 76 48 0 0 ======================--===-========----------------------------------------- -----Bf------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----# REF ~GT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU 94 4c \\_j 01/. 20MPARISOf\\j 48 i i 27 14 C.i 0 V 0 iOO. Oi: 68 0 0 20 15 'J 0 C: c, .......... . U/. iO 8 0 0 3 0 C\n0 0 4. 5% Oi': 3. 4i\nOi\n0% 220 109 1 1 87 55 0 0 0 0 . -------------------------------------------------=========================== -----B~------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----~ R~~ ~~TtT/- 1 # REF PCT!+/-) # REF PCT1+/-l # REF PCTC+/-J t ST~ # STU # STU # STU '----------------------------------------=--------=========--===-============== - .::. r- - i.l=i7- 2- 34 3-Z :00 0-i': 15- i4- l ii- 5- 1- i- ..,. 6 0 0 0 0 iOO 0-o/. 25 0 o./. 0 o/: 0 'i'. 8- 44 4-% 83- 4- 40- 0 0 o/. 2- 0 2- 1 50 0 ., ,. ii i 7 0 0 '1/. 0 0 0 0 u 1: 0 0 0 .\n.! e. :rool 031 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST AME  Y cLcncN,~~, o~nuuL i 'r 9 5 - 9 6 Through JUNE ===============--=------------------------------------------------------======= -----Iki------ -----D'F------ -----NBi'i----- -----t,mF ----# REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # OIU # STU # STU # STU ~======================---=========-----=====----------=====--=-----=========== 0 0 1.U J.O 83. ,...... . ~/. . 0'1/. 57. l l. 0 0 1 l 0 u 13 7 0 0 l '7 9 6 - 9 7 8. 3'l. . O'l. 0 0 1 i 0 0 0 18 0 0 8. 3i'. 0 c, 0 ,_, c, c, C: 4 0 0 4 .i..\n.,,, -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # STU # STU # STU # STU 0 0 12 12 0 0 0,0. _, ,::, I 0 0 ------------------------------------------------------===---=--------======== ~ A.  .... 0 \\._ E .:. \\.J 01/. O'i. O'i 01/. 0 0 ,J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 01/. . 0% 01/. 01/. 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 54. 5i: 0'1/. . 01/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 01: 0 0 Oi: 1i 1i Oi: 0 0 Oo/. 0 0 01. 0 0 ~==----------------------------------------=-=--=============================== C\nOMPARISON ----~------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----B'.'.------ -----BF------ -----NBl'-1----- -----NBF----- 4 REF ?CT\u0026lt;+/-) # REF PCTIT/-l # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU ~-------------------------------------========================================= ... ~  ... 50 0-i: 5- 0 i: L C '\"' 1-\n_ 0 1- 1 oo o-\n-\n1- I..' (j i3- i- C ,_, 0 I. . 0 ,. 0 0 5 5 0 0 25- 25- 0 0 . 0 i: 500. 0 i: . 0 i: . 0 i: . 0 i: 0 0 0 0 0 0 4- 4- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'l. 0 0 i: 1- 1-\n,: 0 0 i: 98- 67- i: 0 0 L~SC32S e. 6/20/97 1449.23 Analysis cf Disciplinary Actions by Scheel From AUGUST Through JUNE 04~ BELWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL --------==-=======---=--------------------------------------------=----===--= ~================--------------------------------------------------------------- -----BM------ -----BF------ ----~NBM----- -----NBF----- '11' H!:.~ f-'CI/IU! ~ H!:.r f-'C!/IU! '\"'H!:.~ f-'CI/IU! 'I'\nH!:.r !-'C!/IU! # STU # STU # STU # STU -========------------=========-==-===------------------------------------------- !::.. ! ,:... 0 0 4 3 u 0 4 0 u 0% 0 0 u 0 u 3 3 0 0 . 0/. 0% 0% 0 0 i i 0 0 0 i 0 0 . oz 0% . 0% 0 0 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O'i 0 0 5 4 0 0 i9 8 0 0 -==-=================================--===-----===========------------=======- 1 9 9 6 - 9 7 ===~=================================-------------------------------------==-- S A C-i- i0/\"1c SJSF r:. .f. ..... -----B~------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT h REF PCT/TOT ff - I I' # STU # STU # STU C, 0 C C '-' 20MPAR ISOl'l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C\n. 01/. . 01: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 . Oi: 60. Oi: . 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O,\n. 01/. Oi: O Oi: 0 0 5 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -----B~------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----# R~r PCT!~/-) # REF PCT--/-) # REF PCT!+/-l # REF PCT!+/-) 1=i' STU # STU # STU # STU ------ -------------============================================================= ,.._, (_ 2- 50. v-, C} 15- l- l- C 0 /. u =: 0 % 0 % 0 0 '\"\"-i 0 V 0 1- i- 0 0 . 0 /. 200 0 i: 0 1/. u /. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G % 0 0 0 1- 0 0 i9- 8- 0 0 LIS0325 Analysis of Dis~iplinary Actions e. :4-40 le From AUGUST Through JUNE ~~~ BOONE PAR~ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ===-------------------------------------------------------------------------- i 9 9 5 - 9 6 ~======------------------------------------------------------------------------ -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- ~ H!::\nr-'1~ I/ I U I :ff: H=:~ t-'C ! / ! U ! ~ H:t- t--'C ! / ! U ! ~ H!::i ~C ! / ! U ! # STU # STU # STU # STU ~~======----------------------------------------------------------------------- C) l l - - 0 .-. '' 0 0 2 2 0 0 i05 40 0 0 l 9 9 6 - 9 7 . 0% 0 0 iO 4 0- 0 0 u 0 0 0 C,, 0 0 0 '--i 0 u 2. 9Z 0 0 23 12 0 0 475 i48 0 0 -===============-=======================----=--=====--------------------===-= r-iCir-1~ SUSF -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----~ \"c~ ~c,tiUT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT :\n: :::, i u # STU # STU # STU Cs lo4 i.J 0 . O\",/. 58. 6i': . 0% . 0% 0 0 78 40 0 0 0 0 0 27. 9i~ . t_, l 0 0 29 i9 0 0 0 (\n0 (\n0 0 10. 4i: 9 7 0 0 . O'.i. 0 0 . 0'1/. 0 0 O,t . 3. ,..,. , C.lo v: . Ot. Ot. 0 0 280 139 0 0 0 0 0 0 ---- ---===========--------=--=--==-=-=-======================================== COMPARISON ---------------------------------------=--------============================= -----B~------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----~ ~~~ CCT(+/-) # RE~ PCT(~/-\n8 REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+,-) ,\n: STU # STU # STU # STU -----------------------------=-------========================================== J. 5::\n.-. c- 1- :390 9 1/. 0 76 3800 0 '1/. 38 0 0 % (, 0 i'. i05- 0 i: . 0 % () 0 0 19 190. 0 15 0 0 0 105- 0 105- 0 0 0 i': 0 0 '1/. 0 0 0 i': 9 900. 0 1/. 257 7 127 '1/. 0 0 1/. 0 C} 0 1/. 14- 0 % 475- i4- 148- i. 0 0 o/. 0 0 0 e. b/ -0::U-/'-7/ -- l.4 49: 19 G3= Analysis cf Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST CENTRAL ELEMENTARY Through JUNE -============----------------------------------------------------------------- 1 9 9 5 - 9 6 -----~====--------------------------------------------------------------------- -----BM------ -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # ST0 # STU ------NB t-1----- -----r-JB F ----# REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TGT # STU # STU -----~------------------------------------------------------------------------- u 0 145 aO 0 01. 8 ,., \"'- 1 I. 62. 5i\n0'1/. 0 0 0 0 33 20 0 0 01. . O'l. 14. 2'l. . 01. 0 m: 0 6 15. 4 .,, . 4 0 U/. 0 0 20. 7~-~ 18 0 Qi\n0 0 C, 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 39 20 0 0 232 103 0 0 ===~================--=-=--=====--------------------=-==--------------------- l 9 9 6 - 9 7 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT w H~r ~c111u1 # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT  STU # STU # STU # STU 0 . 01. 67 _j 0 0 i2 8 ,) 0 3C) .\n.-, .:.. c:,\n. V u 0% :!.l. 7i': i 4. Oi: 0 0 23 iO 0 0 28 ii 0 0 22. 3/: . 0% 13. 0% 0 0 i i 0 0 3 2 0 i.j Oi: i. Oi: 0% i. 4 ., /. U -., I. 0 0 103 56 0 0 215 90 0 0 ------- -- -------------------------------------------==-======================= COMPARISON ---------- ----------------------------------------==-=====-==-============== -----B~------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----~ RE~ PCT!+/-, # RE~ PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) ~ REF PCT(+/-l # ST~ # ST0 # STU # STU - --------------------------=--=---============================================ 35 109. 4 'l. 11 ,.- c:.c. ,_ _, '-' :._, 0 1. '-' 1100. 0 i: 0 i\n0 i\n0 0 17 6 0 0 20- 20- 0 0 . 0 '1/. 283. 3 i\n. 0 i: . 0 'i: 0 0 I. 0 0 0 1 100. 0 'i: 64 1 36 0 0 I. 0 0 0 3- 0 I. 17- 3- 13- 0 0 i\n0 0 0 --,,- III ,_- -.... --' , , Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by Scheel -r-rom AU1-~L-:::1- - Through JUNE ===============-----------------------------------------------------------=-- i 9 9 5 - 9 6 -=============------------------------------------------------------------------ -----BM------ -----BF------ ----~NBM----- -----NB?----# REF PCT/TOT tt H~~ ~C!/!UT # REF PCT/TOT # H~r ~Ci/!U! # STU # STU # STU # STU --======-----------==================------------------------------------------ 5. A C. i7 i i C} . 0% u . 01/. 0 c, 2 0 0 54 24 0 ij . O'i. i 7. 6% 0 0 i i 0 0 0 10 0 C 0 ._-, . 0 0 . 0% . 01/. 0 0 20 i4 0 0 306 84 0 u -====~==================-=-==-=---------------------------------------=======-\n_776-97 -----3~\n------ -----BF------ -----NBri----- -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STiJ # STU # STU # STU u .-_: 21 13 0 u u . O'i~ 55. 3i: 0 0 16 12 0 0 0 0 0 . i-J ,\n. . 0% . O'.I. . 0% 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 c, 0 G c... CJ/. . 0'.'I. 0 . .,, . 0 G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'.'I. O'i: O'i'. O,:. O'i. 0 0 38 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 ----==-~===========-=--=-=---==-=============================================== 1111 C  MP AR I SON ~-----------------------------------------------=============================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- .. ___ ,if Ri::f PCT i +/-) # REf PCT,\n-'-/-) # REF PCT ( +/-) # REF PCT ( +/-) ~ # ST\n~: # STU # STU # STU ----- ----------------------------------=--=-------====-===---=--------======== 0 II /~ i4 7n,-, O 'i: 10 C 0 'i. 0 54- . 0 'i'.\n_ . u z. 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 20- 20- 0 0 . 0 t.: 0 1/. 0 i. . 0 ,: 0 0 0 0 0 0 2- 2- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~~ I. I. I. o/. 0 0 18 12 0 0 306- 84- 0 0 Analysis of Discipiinary Actions ..... ' .,. oy ::::cncc1 l , :': 14:49:24 From AUGUST Through JUNE ===~=========---------------------------------------------------------------- l 9 9 5 - 9 6 ==========--=-====~=---=------------------------------------------------------- -----EM------ -----EF------ -----NBM----# kt~ ~Ci/iUi # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU . . . . r-. . . . . .... =?f\" ~.t:.~ r-'' .... l/lUI :p,: ~ i \\.) ===========----=====================------------------------------------------- S. A: C .-. '' 1 l i 32 0 0 59. 7% 0 i i C} iJ 29 ii 0 0 . 0% 0 0 6 0 0 0 i6 0 0 0 0 ., C. 0 0 i. 6'1/. 0 0 i3 ii 0 0 i86 6i 0 0 ~=============-==-----------===---------------------------------------------- l 9 9 6 - 9 7 ========================================------===--=====--------------------- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----# Kt~ ~~i/lUi # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU ===~=============~-====================--=-==-==-=======--------------------- r:. J. ... 0 c, 0 . O,\n. . Vl. COMPAR ISOt-.i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 01/. 0 0 0 0 2 1 u 0 . 0% 100. Oi: . 01. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U ~ ,. ., m: 0'1/. 0'1/. 0'1/. -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----~ R~~ PCT(+/-)# REF PCTl+i-1 # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+,-) c .3T...: # STU # STU # STU 0 0 9 8 0 0 2 1 0 0 -- ---=--=-=----=-======--==---------------=-================================== SC 0 o/. t.: lii- C C 0 i- iOO 1..,,-, 1- 29- 1- C.,,: u 0 % 0 0 6- iOO. 0-'i. 5- 0 C} 4i- 4i- 0 0 . 0 /. 0 0 0 0 0 u 3- 3- 0 0 . 0 1/. . 0 '1/. . 0 1/. 0 0 4- 3- 0 0 . 0\n,\ni84- 60- . 'J '1/. 0 0 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School - 'FT'cm AUGUST INDIAN HILLS ELEMENTARY Through JUf..JE SCHOOL --------=====---------------------------------------------------------------- 1 9 9 5 - 9 6 ========-=--------------------------------------------------------------------- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- # STU # STU # STU # STU ~=========--=------------------------------------------------------------------ - - ,_ 0 e,.,. 46 0 C 0% 66. 4Z 0 4 0 0 25 i8 0 0 Oo/. Oo/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 s 0 0 . Oo/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 oz O'i. 0 0 7 4 0 0 i22 73 0 0 ==~=-====================================================-------------------- i 9 9 6 - 9 7 ====-===============-=-===-==========---------------------------------------- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT 'ff\n::, I LI # STU # STU # STU 0 0 . Oi: \n,: c:.,. 0 ., /. 0 0 Oi: 0 0 O'i. Oi: 0 0 26 16 _ 3UY2 CLUE 12 b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oi: 0 Oi: 0 0 C..i u 0 Oi: U/. Oi: 0 0 Oi: 0 0 0 Oi: 0 0 0 0 Of~ 0 0 0 --------------------------------------------------------=-----===--===-======== COMPA RI Sot-J ----------------------------------------------------=====-=-=-=============== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----N~M----- -----N~~----- II # RE~ P2T!+/-) # REF PCTt~/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) ':'f STL # STU # STU # STU -----------------=-=====-=======---===-======================================== 11 366 0 i'. C 0 5 C 1- 0 I. 0 'i. . 0 i: 0 ,. 0 0 0 0 0 0 16- 16- 0 0 . 0 i: . 0 1/. . 0 'i. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u i: 1/. % i: I. 0 0 19 12 0 0 122- 73- 0 u D:50325 Analysis cf Disciplinary Actions e 6/20/97 by School 14 4 14 From AUGUST Through JUNE ~hool 032 LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL =---========------------------------------------------------------=====--==== i 9 9 5 - 9 6 ===---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----Bi'i------ -----BF------ -----NB M----- -----r-m F ----- # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT W H~~ ~C!/!U! ~ H~~ ~C!/!U! # STU # STU # STU # STU ================-------------------=--------------------------------------===== !-iJrE: SUSP EXPULSION 0 0 C, :.3 0 0 23 i7 0 0 6c:,. 7% U - ',i . 47. 9% 0'1/. 0 0 2 1 0 0 7 3 0 0 . 01/. 0% i4. 6% 0% 0 0 i i 0 0 0 7 0 0 01/. ii. i 1/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oi: 0'1/. 0 0 9 5 0 0 48 27 0 0 =======~=========-----=-----==============-=-=-=============================== 1 9 9 6 - 9 7 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT 41c STU # STU # STU # STU -------------------------------=-----------------------==--------------======= S A C. t:. !. - Ci 18 lU C, C, . 01. 90. Oi\n,, ... . v/. . 0% 01/. 0 0 2 i 0 0 G 0 0 'J . O,\n. 10. Oi\n01/. 0'1/. . V/. 0 G 0 0 0 0 0 0 'J 0 . 01. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ., I. 0 0 Oi: 20 11 o,: 0 0 0 ., /. 0 0 o,: 0 0 -------------------------------------------------=-====================--=----- COMPARISON -=-= -------------------------------------------=========================--==- -----BM------ -----b~------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----w R~f PCT(+/-1 # RE~ PCT(~r-l # REF PCT(+/-l # REF PCT(+/-) # ST0 # S,U # STU # STU ~===------- --------------=---====--============================================ - - - - ::. r- ._,. CJ 12 i- 200 0 % 0 I. 0 'i. 0 1/. . 0 .. 0 0 C Li 'l. 0 I. 0 o/. '..) i. 0 0 1- iOlJ I,_ I i- 0 0 18- i8- 0 0 0 '1/. 0 0 V 0 0 0 0 0 0 C.1 Ci I. .... /. 0 0 11 6 0 0 48- 27- 0 0 e 111 e =hool DIS0323 1 4: 4S:  i -: 037 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions by School rrom AUGUST Through JUNE l 9 9 5 - 9 6 =------========------------------------------------------------------------===- -----Lir:------ -----BF------ -----f\\iEM----- -----NEi=\"----# REF ~CT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT ~ REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU \"' STU ~-===-~=-==--------------------------------------------------------------------- !::.. ! ._\nt:/ .:.P UL'.:)IQN l - C: 12 u (__, . Oi~ 63. 2i: . 01. 0 0 5 3 0 0 :36 0 0 1 9 9 6 - 9 7 . O~I. 0 0 3 0 0 0 21 0 0 . U/:: .-,, ... . U/. 0 c, 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- 8 H~r ~C!/IU! # REF PCT/TOT 8 H~~ ~C!/IU! 8 H~~ ~C!/IU! # STU # STU # STU # STU C} . O'i. . O'i. . Oo/. 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 () 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 . Oi: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oo/~ o~,: 0% 0% 0% 0 0 18 0 0 190 109 0 0 0 0 45 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 ----------=-=----------------==========~======================================== C OtiP AR Ism~ --------------------------------------------------=========================== -----B~------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----# R~F ~CTI+/-) # REF PCT(+/-l # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) \"\" ~ 1 '-' # STU # STU # STU -----------------------------------------=---==-=============================== i.., l_. '- 12( 1 - l-  100. 0 ,. 0 C 4 il 0 l} 3oi- 'J () G ,,_ 80 0 i: 0 i~ 0 0 3 .-, c:.. 0 0 31- 31- 0 0 iOO. 0 i: 0 i: 0 I. 0 i'. 0 0 0 0 0 0 3- 3- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '1/. 0 0 i'. 22 15 I. 0 0 i'. 190- 109- i'. 0 0 .- ... ,....,,.... .:...: .: ::,: _:._ ..:-_c:_.=: , Analysis cf Disciplinary Actions by School 14 4~.20 From AUGUST Through JUNE ~~u MEADOW PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ---=====--==========-=-----------------------------------------------==-===== 1995-9C., ~=====-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----~n------ -----BF------ ----~NBM----- -----NB~----# RE~ FCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STLJ # STU # STU # STU :~==================-==-----=-\n-=====---------------------=-=------------------- a - - - .,.. -... , !:.li.,'._.tL~lUl\\l c, c, . Ul. . 01/. 0 0 .-. '' 0 0 0 .-.-,. ._j I 17 0 0 l 9 9 6 - 9 7 . O,\n. -----B~------ -----BF------ # R~F PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT ,. STU # C\nTi I 0 0 0 0 0 v 0 14 0 0 -----NBM----' lf 1-\u0026lt;!:::~ !-'Ci/ i OT # STU 0 u c, 0 0 0 7 0 0 0'1/. -----NBF----# REF PCT /TOT # STU 0 C 0 0 0 0 182 71 0 0 ---=~=~--=-=------------=---=======----====================================== 42 53. 81/. 0 Q 0 i6 8 0 0 0 C} 0 0 i9 6 0 0 0 23. 81/. . 0% 0 O'i. 0 0 0 2 2. 51/. 80 i 37 0 O'i. 0 0 0 0 Oo/\n0 0 0 0 O'l. i 0 1 -~~-- -~---===-=-=----------==-==============================================-=- COMPARISON ~=---- ------------------------------------------==========================---- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----~ R~~ F:TC~i-1 # REF PCTl-/-l # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU # STU =~------------------------------------==-=======================================- - ... ... =,_ 1._}i:,  II 0 -.~ .:::.c.:.. \\_ I - . C ,,_ 0 0 a ::OG. 0 ,-. 0 0 i: 0 0 0 1600 0 '1/. 19 1900. 0 6 0 ,. 0 0 0 . 0 i: sc,- 0 50- 0 1/. 0 0 0 i: 0 0\n0 0 0 '1/. 'c\u0026gt;.. 200. 0 i: 80 1 37 i\n0 0 i: 0 0 0 i. 18- 0 i: 162- 18- 71- i\n0 0 '1/. 1 0 1 DlS0325 14: 49:21 C,i41 Analysis cf Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through JUNE HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL d ---- i 9 9 5 - 9 6 =========--======-------------------------------------------------------------- -----BM----- -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- a =!1' Ki::!- rL I/ I U I 'II= Kl:.!- 1-'C I/ ! U I 'II= Kl:.~ !-TI/ ! U ! '!=I Kl:.!- !-'CI/ I U ! # STU # STU # STU # STU :===========---=======--------======-------------------------------------------- !:. . .i , E\\PUL..S ION 0 i i C} 0 121 38 0 . 01/. 0 0 2 2 0 0 54 23 0 0 . 01. o' b.', ,. 7'i . 01/. 22. 6% . Oo/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 . 0% 2i. 31/. 0 0 0 0 0 0 u 6 0 0 . 01/. 0 0 3 3 0 0 239 90 0 0 ================--------=--=-===---====------------======--------------====== S. A C. a HOl\"E 5,..iSP. i 9 9 6 - 9 7 -----B~------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU C, .:S3. 2i~ 14 C,_\n0 0 0 0 4 4 C: C: 'J 0 0 0 10. 5i: 0 0 10 10 0 0 2 2 0 0 . 0% 26. 3% 100. Oi: . 01. 0 0 0 0 C: C: C: 0 0 0 0 .,, . 0 ., /. Oi: 0% Qi\n0 0 38 28 0 0 2 c\n0 0 ----~=~:=====~=====-------------------=-=-----------============================ --\"'===-=======:::=======CAORIM SOPi =,J= ============================================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- a # RE~ ccrc~/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STL\n# S,U # STU # STU ----- --------------=-========================================================== _:..:. r: C II ,aJr:= S-.)SP. . ::. .:::. -  ..... II . 0 % 23 0 '1/. . C)  .J 0 u 2 2 54- iCl 0 . 0 i: 100. 0 'i. . 0 % 0 % 0 0 iO iO 0 0 49- 49- 0 0 1 ooc1 o 1. 0 'i. . 0 i\". 0 0 0 0 0 0 i3- 13- D 0 0 0 0 0 0 I~ 0 0 I. 35 25 I. 0 0 ~~ 237- 88- '1/. 0 0 ..ie .. e. I:lSC325 6/20/97 14 49: 23 Analysis cf Disciplinary Actions by School From AUGUST Through JUN~ HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ------- -- ::. 9 9 5 - 9 6 ------------=-====------------------------------------------------------------- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- ~ H~~ ~C!/!U! # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT ff H~~ PC1/!U! # STU # STU # STU 'fl STU -~=----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 0 C) iCS 34 0 0 u 0 0 0 i6 9 0 . 0% . 0'1/. 0 0 l 0 i8 0 . 0% 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 . 0% . 6Z 0 1 1 0 0 i57 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 -===~========================================================================= J. 9 9 b - 9 7 ================-----===============-----------=---====------------------=--- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU -~==============-----------========-----------------=-=---------------------- 0 . U-.,,, . :_. i l de: I = Ill :::x-p,~,_\nE\nr,, . 0% G u 5 0 0 0 . Ot . L 1 /. u 0 2 0 0 u 0 c, c, (J ~ ... . /. 0 '..J 0 (.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 01. . 0% . 01. 0 0 18 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 --------====-===-=-----------------------------------====-----------=-=======-- -~~,==-===============OcM P~ 1R1 sot,J= =============================================== -----E~------ -----b: ------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----- 11 ~ R:C:~\n::2T,+/-) # REF PCT,+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) ~ STu # ST0 # STU # STU __ , --------------------------=-===-==---------=-=========-----------=========== l : l ! 00. 0\n.. 5 500 0 .,.. t:. ... - - .. .. ,_ i- ,_ ,. II 0 i 1 0 0 37- 37- 0 iOO. 0 0 0 0 0 0 i- 1- 0 . c, i: 0 0 17 i 1 0 i57- 62- G 0 e 6,/~20/9/ 14 49: 2~ Analysis of Disciplinary Actions h 1\nC. r h n '\"\" l From AI.JGiJST Through JUNE 044 FIKE VIE~ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ===------=============----------------------------------------------------=== i 9 9 5 - 9 6 =====-------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF---- H~~ ~Cl/!U! # REF PCT/TOT  H~~ ~Ci/!U!  H~~ ~Cl/JUI # STU # STU # STU # STU ~==================-=--------=-==---------------------------------------------- S h C. 0 0 0 14 0 0 i 9 9 6 - 9 7 Oo/. . 0% 0 0 0 12 0 . 0% 0 u 0 0 0 0 0 . 0% 0 i 0 0 i44 56 0 0 -===~===========-----=====--=========--===-==-=---========-------=-=========== S A 2 rlOM:: SUSF -----B0------ -----B~------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----# REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # ST0 # STU # STU # STU 0 21 15 i,_J ,_, u ,l\"\",t:.j . v-1. 72. 4i: 0 0 C! 0 0 C: 0 0 0 0 . O'i. . Oi. 0 0 ., c:.. 2 0 0 0 0 0 . Oi~ . O'i. . Oi'. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O\",. / o,\nl\"'\\I.' U/. O'i. Oi:: 11111111 COMP AR I SON 0 0 29 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 ==--- ------------------------------------------==-=======================-=== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF---- R~F ~CT(+/-l # REF PCT1~1-, # REF PCTC+/-l # REF PCT(+/-) :it STU # STU # STU # STU ====--~---=--------------------------=-======================================== = ,-.., .... . 0 1: 2000 0 % ._._,_: 0 /. 1111 Ill 0 6 0 C 2o-i- () c, 600 0 i: 0 % 0 i': 0 0 2 2 0 0 i9- i9- 0 0 200 0 1: 0 'i. 0 ,. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1: 0 0 I. 28 22 % 0 0 i: 144- 56- '1/. 0 0 : r: oc l. 6/20/97 :!.4 49. 25 Analysis of Disciplinary Actions oy School F~cm AUGUST REDWOOD ELEMENTAR, SCHOOL Through JUNE q====== i 9 9 5 - 9 6 == ~====---=====---------------------------------------------------------------==- -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----~ H~~ ~C!/IU! # REF PCT/TOT W H~~ ~C!/!U! ff H~~ ~C!/!U! # STU # STU # STU 'ft STU 6 0 C 0 u 8 4 0 0 35 13 0 0 . 0% 24. i% . 01/.\n_,\n3 0 0 0 10 0 0 i 5. O}. io. 6:-'. l l 0 0 ..:+ 0 0 20 i4 0 0 i45 59 0 0 ---=-========----------===-===========-===--================================= i 9 9 6 - 9 7 -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----# R~F PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT\n:\nSTU # STU # STU # STU -----------------------------------------------------===-----------------====- 0 13 u 0 69. o:-\n0 0 9 7 0 0 0 0 0 . O'i. Oi'. 01/. 0 (i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 01. . 01/. . Oi'. . O'i. 0 (i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0 0 (~) ,,.: 29 20 Oi'. 0 0 Oo/: 0 0 01. 0 0 - ------===========--=-------=--=-==-=--======================================== COMPARIS Ot\u0026gt;l - -- ----------------------------------------==-=============================== -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----# REr PCTC+/-) # REF PCT1+/-l # REF PCT(+/-) # REF PCT(+,-l 'Ii' STu # STU ~ STU # STU ----- - -------------==-===-==================================================== 0 C) 150 0 '1/. 3 0 'i. 0 ._. 35- C 0 /. 0 0 3- 100 0-1/. 3- 0 0 24- 24- 0 0 0 i: . 0 'i. 0 1/. 0 0 i\n0 0 0 1- 100. C,-1. 9 1- 6 0 0 o/. 0 0 0 7- C.1 o/: 145- 7- 59- 0 0 i~ 0 0 0 Analysis cf Disciplinar~ Actions oy School _, e 1..l 4c\n, u 'From AUGUST Through JUNE noo::. 03':- :::,c.v.:::.!'11,.., :::,1ru:.c.1 c.L.c.11.c.t'l11-1ro SCHOOL ========-======----=---------------------------------------------------====== 1 9 9 5 - 9 6 ~==---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----BM------ -----BF------ # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU -----NBM----# REF PCT/TOT # STU -----NBF----~ h~~ ~Li/lUT # STL.i =-=-=-====----------====================---------------------------------------- S. A '.:: 0 2 u 33 () 28. 6% . 0% 0 0 3 3 0 0 i9 i 1 CJ 0 l 9 9 6 - 9 7 O'i. 42. 9o/: . ()% . 0'1/. 0 0 i3 0 0 . 0% 23. 9Z . 0'1: 0 0 0 C} 0 0 0 0 0 0 . oz O'i. 0 0 7 6 0 0 92 57 0 0 -=====~========------==--==-=========--=----=-----=--------------------------- S A C -----BM------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----# RE~ PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # REF PCT/TOT # STU # STU # STU # STU C: (\n100. Or. 0 0 1 'J 0 0 0 0 0 O,j . O'i. 0 0 0 0 0 0 C, C, 0 c, Or. Oi: Oi: O~i.: o,~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01/. 0 ., 1. Oi: 0 ., /, U-\n, . 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 1 1 ----~=~===========--~--=-------------------------=-============================= ~ COMP AR I Sot,j ~----==================-====-===-----------=---=============================== -----B~------ -----BF------ -----NBM----- -----NBF----~ RE~ FCT(+/-l # RE\nPCT(+/-1 # REF ?CT(+/-) # REF PCT(+/-) # STU # STU # STU -------- ------------==---======================================-============== c, 50 2- i9- 0 0 Ill 66. 7-'i. . 0 'i. 0 2- 1- 0 C 22- 22- 0 0 . 0 i: 100. C,-i~ 0 /. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 o/. . 0 'i. . 0 X 0 0 3- 2- 0 0 92- 57- 1 i  -II d -II II II NORTH LITTLE ROCK PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS SCHOOL YEAR 96-97 DISTRICT LEVEL GRAPHS   II NORTH LITTLE ROCK PUBLIC SCHOOLS Action 09: S.A.C. DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS SCHOOL YEAR 96-97 DISTRICT LEVEL Action 1 O: Home Suspension 1,400 ~--------------, 700r-----------------, 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 95-96  96-97  BM BF NBM NBF 1,052 446 410 140 -- -- 1,264 553 469 142 Action 11 : Boys Club Suspension 400~-------------~ 300 200 100 0 95-96  96-97  BM 334 - 357 BF NBM NBF 82 72 12 146 85 20 600 - ----- 400 - 300 -- --- --- - 0 BM BF NBM NSF 95-96  162 46 47 3 96-97 ---- - -- - 587 207 125 17 Action 12 Elem Intervention Class BM BF NBM NSF 95-96  1,563 492 510 71 -- -- 96-97  154 30 32 3    BM 95-96  2 96-97  3 II II NORTH LITTLE ROCK PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS SCHOOL YEAR 95-96 DISTRICT LEVEL Action 17 Expulsion BF NBM NBF 1 0 2- 7 0 0 NORTH LITTLE ROCK PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS SCHOOL YEAR 96-97 ELEMENTARY K-6 Action 09: SAC Action 10: Home Suspension 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0'--------------~ 95-96D 96-97  0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 BM BF NBM NBF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Action 11: Boys Club Suspension 0 ._____ ___________ ___, BM BF NBM NBF 95-96  0 0 0 0 96-97  -- - 0 0 0 0 400 - - 100 - 0 BM BF NBM 95-96  130 35 39 96-97  ---- ~ - ---- 456 170 102 Action 12 Elem Intervention Class BM BF NBM 95-96  1.~~~ 492 510 96-9711 - -- 154 30 32 NBF 1 -- 12 NBF 71 3 BM 95-96  0 96-97  2 I I I I I I I NORTH LITTLE ROCK PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS SCHOOL YEAR 96-97 ELEMENTARY K-6 Action 17 Expulsion BF NBM NBF 0 0 0 - - 0 0 0 NORTH LITTLE ROCK PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS SCHOOL YEAR 96-97 MIDDLE SCHOOLS Action 09: SAC Action 10: Home Suspension 700 ,-----------------, 60 ,----------------, 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 .__.___ BM 95-96D 582 96-97  595 BF NBM 257 218 - 289 250 Action 11 : Boys Club Suspension BM BF NBM 95-96  165 56 40 - -- 96-97  165 86 52 NBF 55 60 NBF 6 13 95-96  96-97  0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 BM BF NBM 21 8 6 - -- - ---- 48 14 14 Action 12 Elem Intervention Class NBF 0- 5 0 ~----------------' BM BF NBM NSF 95-96  0 0 0 0 96-97  - - - 0 0 0 0 BM 95-96  0 96-97  1  NORTH LITTLE ROCK PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS SCHOOL YEAR 96-97 MIDDLE SCHOOLS Action 17 Expulsion BF NBM NBF 0 0 2- 1 0 0 NORTH LITTLE ROCK PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS SCHOOL YEAR 96-97 HIGH SCHOOLS Action 09: SAC Action 1 O: Home Suspension 700 .-------------------, 600 500 400 300 200 100 o..........__- BM 95-960 470 96-97  - 669 BF NBM 1-89 -19-2 264 219 Action 11 : Boys Club Suspension NBF 85 - 82 250 .-------------------, BM BF NBM 95-96  10 3 2 96-97  f--- - 83 23 9 Action 12 Elem Intervention Class 0.8 - -- - 0.6 - 0.4 - 0.2 - NBF 2 -- 0 o.....__ ___________ _, BM BF NBM NSF BM BF NBM NBF 95-96  169 26 32 6 95-96  0 0 0 0 -- -- - - - - 96-97  192 60 33 7 96-97  0 0 0 0 NORTH LITTLE ROCK PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS SCHOOL YEAR 96-97 HIGH SCHOOLS Action 17 Expulsion 7--------------, 6 5 4 3 2 0 95-96  96-97  BM 2 0 BF NBM NBF 1 0 0 6 0 0 NORTH LITTLE ROCK PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS 5 YEAR TREND NORTHL ITTLER OCKP UBLICS CHOOLS DISCIPLINARAYC TIONS 5 YEART RENDS Action 09: Student Assignment Class (SAC) 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 - 600 400 - 200 0 92-93  93-94. 94-95  - - --- 95-96  96-97. BM 920 - 977 - ---869 1,052 1,264 BF -- 486 - - - 529 -- -- 460 ---- 446 - - 553 NBM NBF - - 4-9-2- - 1. 5- 8 449 156 - - - - 411 126 - ---- - - 410 140 ,--- -- - - 469 142 - NORTHL ITTLER OCKP UBLICS CHOOLS DISCIPLINARAYC TIONS 5 YEART RENDS ---- 1-   Action 10: Home Suspensions 700 ~--------------------~ 600 500 400 300 200 100 - 0 92-93  93-94  - !~-95. -- - 95-96111 96-97  - BM 134 - 231 -- --- 236 - - 162 - 587 BF NBM NBF 69 58 14 - 60 76 22 - -- 106 103 20 - - - - - - - 46 47 3 - -- - 207 125 17 300 200 100 0 BM 92-93  276 93-94. - -- 119 94-95 - 133 95-96  -- 334 --- 96-97  357 NORTHL ITTLER OCKP UBLICS CHOOLS DISCIPLINARAYC TIONS 5 YEART RENDS --r -. - - . . . - . - Action 11: Boys Club BF NBM 97 87 --- - --- - --- 39 - . 39 44 31 - -- - - -- 82 72 - - ---- - - -- - - 146 85 NSF 10 9 8 12 20 ... -. NORTHL ITTLER OCKP UBLICS CHOOLS DISCIPLINARAYC TIONS 5 YEART RENDS Action 12: Elementary Assignment Class (E.I.C.) 2,000 ,------------------------, 1,500 1,000 500 0 L...--- 92-93  93-94  -- 94-95  -~ 95-96  - 96-97  BM - 0 -- -168 -- 178 -- 1,56~ - 154 BF NBM NBF - - 0 - -0 0 54 45 8 ------ -- -- -- 68 58 5 ------ -- - 492 510 71 ---- --- - - - 30 32 3 NORTHL ITTLER OCKP UBLICS CHOOLS DISCIPLINARAYC TIONS 5 YEART RENDS Action 17: Expulsions a~----------------------, 6 , __ - ------ -- ----- 2 - 0 BM BF NBM NBF 92-93 -6 3 - - -1 0 93-94 6 4 - -- - 3 - 0 94-95  7 0 1 0 - - -- - - - 95-96  2 1 0 2 - - -- 96-97  3 7 0 0\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_418","title":"Discipline, management report","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["1996/1997"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Educational statistics","School discipline","Education--Evaluation","School management and organization"],"dcterms_title":["Discipline, management report"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/418"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nRecidivism Report - Black/White Year: 9^ Quarter: 1 Quarter: 4 Counts Each Student Once LEVEL SCHOOL BM BE WM WF OM Senior High CENTRAL 142 76-*' 34 9 2 Junior High Elementary v^FAIR J HALL ^MCCLELLA I l\\^------ /parkview \u0026lt;/CLOVR JR ,^/DUNBAR y FORST HT JHENDERSN '4/IABEL JR J MANN M/S '4uL HT J /SOUTHWST 'Badgett /bale J BASELINE BOOKER ZBRADY YCARVER -CHICOT -CLOVR EL  DODD /fair PRK ,/FORST PK / FRANKLIN -/fulbrigh r-^tayafcJflKrtgl.lihiliMlli ................. Tuesday, July 27, 1999 68 80 4 39 W 41 15 10 0 12 10 3 102-^ TT 31-1 177-3 120 166''* 143-4 93 65 93 114-i 5 11 95-3 57 - so-f 68 51 30-'i 57-M 8 2 11 4 1 2 0 7 (^) 9 43 - I 34 19 26 28 18 24 27 13 26 60 10 18 19 10 25 29 7 6 2 3 3 17 0 0 2 9 6 11 (r) 14-1 10 1 5 4 4 1 8 1 2 4 5 2 3 1 RECEIVED AUG 8 1999 Office OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING OF Total 0 1 0 0 f'l I , Senior Highx^^ Q 3 3 13 19 19 8 6 6 JJ' 1 2 0 2 1 0 3 0 0 2 0 1 1 8 0 4 0 3 0 1 2 0 2-1 Junior High 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 263339 133 '% 146 14D 161 92 'I 1 8+9- T IS 296 241 a J? 303 Ait 252 a 4? 179 140 143 HO 193 1747 12 33 35 35 20 37 93 12 22 28 21 as 42 H'wyawfnrti'H t iM' Page 1 of 2Recidivism Report - Black/White Year: 97 Quarter: 1 Quarter: 4 Counts Each Student Once LEVEL SCHOOL BM BF WM WF OM OF Total Elementary /garland / *GEYER SP 12 24 3 2 8 1 0 0 0 6 2 1 1 0 /gibbs 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 /JEFFRSN 2 1 1 0 0 0 4 VM LKING 21 39 J MABEL EL 34 17 64 Vmcdermot 19 28 ^MEADCLIF 21 28 '/mitchell Jotter or ^UL HT E 34 18 58 VRIGHTSEL 10 16 d ROCKFELR i/rOMINE 20 38 15 TERRY 14 28 4 6 3 5 0 g 4 0 0 8 3 1 0 0 0 3 4 8 1 1 5 5 2 7 3 0 0 5 0 9 5 6 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 4 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 4/VAKEFIEL 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 . WASHNGTN I 29 10 46 f S WATSON 22 31 vWEST HIL 29 36 5 0 1 0 5 2 1 1 0 4 3 0 0 0 ..WILLIAMS '^/ILSON 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 5 WOODRUFF 14 5 0 0 Tuesday, July 27,1999 5 /o^ 1^ J? Elernentary Grand Total 20 925 Page 2 of 2SCHOOL: 014 ALTERNATIVE LEARNING CENTER I OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT WM UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: SANCTIONS LONG TERM' SUSMRC 6/04/97 I EXPELLED 07/03/97 PAGE TOTAL 25 I Dis Cond CLASS 06 2 110 SUBTOTAL 1 1 WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM WF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM WF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT 1 1 1 1 1 1 FAILOBEY Foul Lan Assault Battery Fighting PRQSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond CLASS 07 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 060 110 010 020 040 090 105 110 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 SUBTOTAL 2 1 5 7 19 1 2 1 5 7 20 1 1 1 1 2 4 1 1 1 2 5 1 3 5 9 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 6 11 1 1 1 3 2 t, 2 1 6 13 32 1 1 1 2 5 1 3 2 4 3 2 1 15 37 FAILOBEY Assault Battery Fighting Gambling PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging D Ass Staf Gang Mem CLASS 08 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 060 010 020 040 050 090 105 110 123 071 123 3 1 3 1 SUBTOTAL 6 2 2 10 8 1 1 34 1 1 9 11 6 2 3 11 17 1 1 45 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 9 2 15 1 1 2 3 1 1 10 2 17 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 3 6 2 It 12 27 1 1 3 63 1 1 2 3 1 3 6 2 It 13 28 1 1 3 65 Ref Ruis Assault Battery Fighting Gambling PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging D FIREUORK AL-DRUGS V As Sf Pos Ueap UEAPONS1 CLASS 09 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 062 010 020 040 050 090 105 110 123 140 150 072 090 091 2 1 2 2 3 SUBTOTAL SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 5 1 3 15 20 2 1 1 51 104 1 1 3 10 17 29 6 1 It 18 30 2 1 1 68 133 2 5 7 1 1 1 1 1 13 16 40 1 1 2 6 1 1 14 18 46 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 4 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 It 1 6 1 5 19 44 2 1 1 1 1 88 183 1 1 2 10 2 It 1 (, 1 5 19 45 2 1 1 1 1 1 90 193LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 7 PROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE\n6/04/97 SCHOOL: 004 METROPOLITAN VO-TECH ED CENTER I SANCT IONS I I OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF FAILOBEY 1 060 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL LeftSchl FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Foul Lan Assault PROSTAFF INSUBORD Har Comm AL-DRUGS Gang Mem CLASS OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM WF UHT TOT BLK WHT TOT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 050 060 062 110 010 090 105 120 150 123 2 1 1 2 2 1 3 10 SUBTOTAL 12 1 2 1 4 1 4 1 4 Ref Ruis AL-DRUGS Pos Ueap 1 2 3 062 150 090 1 1 CLASS 11 SUBTOTAL 2 1 1 FAILOBEY Theft INSUBORD Dis Cond Har Comm 1 2 2 2 2 060 030 105 110 120 1 CLASS 12 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 4 1 1 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 18 6 1 1 3 2 1 3 1 1 16 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 5 24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 1 3 1 17 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 3 2 1 3 1 18 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 5 2 2 1 1 25 2 27I SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: I SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 13 OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM I UF UHT TOT BLK TOTAL UHT TOT PROSTAFF INSUBORD AL-DRUGS 2 2 2 090 105 150 1 1 1 1 CLASS 07 SUBTOTAL 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 Battery Theft Fighting INSUBORD AL-DRUGS 2 2 2 2 2 020 030 040 105 150 1 1 1 1 1 1 CLASS 08 SUBTOTAL Tardies Assault Fighting INSUBORD 1 2 2 2 133 010 040 105 CLASS 09 SUBTOTAL FAILOBEY FAILDET Ref Det Smoking Assault Battery Fighting Loi ter Mischief PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORO Dis Cond Paging D RAPRINGS AL-DRUGS UEAPONS1 Ueapon 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 060 080 090 100 010 020 040 070 080 090 100 105 110 123 130 150 091 121 CLASS 10 SUBTOTAL MinAlter Ref Ruts Smoking Foul Lan Assault Battery Fighting 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 030 062 100 110 010 020 040 1 2 2 1 3 3 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 6 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 7 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 4 1 1 1 2 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 5 1 1 7 1 18 9 1 4 51 3 4 1 2 2 1 6 1 1 1 13 1 1 4 9 7 1 1 8 1 24 10 1 1 5 64 1 4 8 1 11 1 1 6 1 1 1 7 1 1 1 1 2 2 4 6 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 6 11 10 2 12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 9 1 8 1 1 8 1 26 10 1 1 6 1 1 78 1 1 2 7 1 12 1 1 1 1 9 1 9 1 1 10 1 33 10 1 1 7 1 1 90 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 8 1 1 11 1 1 1 5 1 8 1 1 11I SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT UM UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT I BM SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 1 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED I TOTAL BF BLK TOT UM WF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM WF UHT TOT BLK WHT TOT MinAlter CLASS 1 030 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PROSTAFF CLASS 01 2 090 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Battery AL-DRUGS Pos Weap 2 2 3 020 150 090 1 1 1 1 CLASS 08 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 MinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Smoking Assault Battery Theft Fighting Loiter Mischief PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Smoke 2 Paging D AL-DRUGS Ass Staf V As Sf WEAPONS1 In Riot Gang Mem 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 Z 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 030 060 062 100 010 020 030 040 070 080 090 105 110 121 123 150 071 072 091 120 123 2 1 1 2 1 It 1 2 4 1 2 1 1 CLASS 10 SUBTOTAL MinAlter Ref Ruis Smoking Assault Battery Fighting Loiter Mischief PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORD 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 030 062 100 010 020 040 070 080 090 100 105 2 12 1 2 10 Itl 2 4 10 94 1 1 2 4 9 11 2 3 16 1 2 23 1 It 13 63 3 1 2 1 6 2 1 1 1 4 6 8 16 1 3 46 140 17 3 1 2 1 2 1 1 11 2 13 2 2 6 2 2 1 11 1 3 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 1 2 7 2 1 3 20 2 2 1 2 2 4 11 3 4 14 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 2 1 25 3 1 1 1 2 1 28 2 2 5 1 8 1 4 1 5 1 12 1 3 It 23 1 4 13 67 17 1 8 17 3 1 1 7 2 180 2 1 1 1 3 3 7 2 1 3 22 It 1 2 1 1 4 5 26 1 It 16 74 19 1 9 20 3 1 1 7 2 202 1 1 1 1 2 13 6 1 12 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 13 1 2 8 1 12SCHOOL: 001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: SUSMRC 6/04/97 I I SANCTIONS I OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM 07/03/97 WF WHT TOT BLK PAGE TOTAL WHT 2 TOT Dis Cond Forgery Paging D AL-DRUGS Sale Ale V As Sf Pos Weap WEAPONS1 Extort In Riot Gang Mem ROBBERY CLASS 11 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 110 122 123 150 010 072 090 091 110 120 123 130 4 1 4 4 1 1 2 8 1 2 6 4 4 9 2 11 1 1 2 1 1 SUBTOTAL 27 25 52 1 3 1 2 2 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 19 1 2 6 1 3 6 2 5 15 5 20 13 4 1 1 1 1 17 2 1 3 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 7 1 1 3 1 1 76 1 23 25 1 4 11 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 99 Smoking Battery Fighting Loiter PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging D AL-DRUGS V As Sf Pos Weap In Riot CLASS 12 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 100 020 040 070 090 105 110 123 150 072 090 120 1 3 2 6 2 2 3 1 1 4 1 1 SUBTOTAL 20 7 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 142 78 1 4 6 6 3 2 4 1 27 220 1 1 1 3 1 1 8 42 . 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 8 1 3 1 1 4 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 I, 2 4 1 6 7 3 2 1 2 35 1 1 1 3 1 1 8 1 2 k 1 7 8 3 2 1 1, 2 2 43 50 42 - 8 50 4 1 5 18 6 24 294 55 349SCHOOL: 008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL I OUT OF SCHOOL LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: SANCTIONS LONG TERM SUSMRC 6/04/97 I EXPELLED OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM 07/03/97 WF WHT TOT BLK PAGE TOTAL WHT 14 I TOT Mischief PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Forgery Paging D AL-DRUGS CLASS 11 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 080 090 105 110 122 123 150 2 2 6 1 1 2 2 5 8 1 1 1 2 3 8 1 1 SUBTOTAL 1 2 21, 1 19 1 3 43 1 1 2 1 3 4 3 7 1 1 1 3 44 1 3 7 2 3 9 1 1 4 3 51 FAILOBEY Ref Ruis FAILDET Ref Det Foul Lan Tardies Assault Battery Theft Fighting PROSTAFF Dis Cond Paging D AL-DRUGS CLASS 12 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 060 062 080 090 110 133 010 020 030 040 090 110 123 150 1 1 2 1 1 SUBTOTAL 6 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 85 1 3 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 7 1 1 10 16 47 132 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 1 9 1 1 1 1 17 1 10 1 2 1 5 2 1 1 1 1 7 2 1 1 1 27 19 10 29 16 2 18 2 2 2 152 31 183SCHOOL: 002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT UM UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: I UHT TOT BM SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE V As Sf CLASS 05 3 072 SUBTOTAL INSUBORD 2 105 CLASS 07 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 INSUBORD 2 105 CLASS 08 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 2 2 discipline by reason code 8/19/96 TO DATE: SANCTIONS LONG TERM' BF BLK TOT UM UF 6/04/97 I expelled TOTAL WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 MinAlter Ref Ruis FORGERY Assault Battery Theft Fighting prostaff INSUBORD Dis Cond Har Comm Paging D AL-DRUGS WEAPONSI 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 030 062 140 010 020 030 040 090 105 110 120 123 150 091 122 5 40 3 17 1 1 1 1 10 2 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 Assembly CLASS 10 SUBTOTAL 1 66 26 8 57 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 3 3 3 1 92 9 1 2 1 13 1 1 1 3 10 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 16 1 2 1 2 1 1 8 57 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 3 3 3 1 2 95 10 1 2 2 1 16 8 67 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 13 5 4 3 1 2 111 LeftSchl FAILOBEY Ref Ruts Foul Lan Assault Battery Theft Fighting Loiter Mischief PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Har Comm Forgery Paging D AL-DRUGS Ass Staf V As Sf 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 050 060 062 110 010 020 030 040 070 080 090 105 110 120 122 123 150 071 072 1 2 1 1 3 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 16 5 1 3 2 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 1 1 5 21 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 6 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 4 1 1 5 21 6 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 6 2 1 4 1 1 2 1 4 4 1 1 11 23 6 1 1 2 1 1 1SCHOOL: 002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 1 OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT UM UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BM SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 4 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 SANCTIONS LONG TERM' I EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM WF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT UEAPONSl Gang Mem CLASS 11 3 3 091 123 1 1 SUBTOTAL 36 15 51 5 7 12 1 3 1 3 2 1 3 1 1 57 12 1 1 69 ReT Ruis Smoking Battery Fighting Loiter Mischief INSUBORD Dis Cond AL-DRUGS Pos Ueap UEAPONS2 Assembly 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 062 100 020 040 070 080 105 110 150 090 092 122 1 1 1 1 1 1 CLASS 12 SUBTOTAL SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 1 3 1 5 7 2 2 21 125 1 5 2 2 10 52 4 1 1 I, 1 1 10 9 4 2 31 177 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 5 2 2 1 1 1 1 10 9 4 1 1 2 34 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 4 1 1 11 9 5 2 1 2 39 21 12 33 7 7 \u0026lt;\u0026gt; 6 190 33 223SCHOOL: 012 MC CLELLAN HIGH SCHOOL I OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT WM WF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: WHT TOT BM SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 21 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 SANCTIONS I I LONG TERM' EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT Fighting 2 040 CLASS 02 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ind Exp 2 100 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Fighting Paging D 2 2 040 123 CLASS 08 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 IN SUBORD 2 105 CLASS 09 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 MinAlter LettSchl FAILOBEY Ref Ruis FAILDET Smoking Foul Lan Battery Theft Fighting PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Forgery Paging D AL-DRUGS V As Sf Pos Weap WEAPONS1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 030 050 060 062 080 100 110 020 030 040 090 105 110 122 123 150 072 090 091 1 1 4 9 1 3 1 2 1 19 11 9 1 2 1 CLASS 10 SUBTOTAL 66 5 1 5 1 2 19 1 3 1 6 5 14 2 3 1 2 3 38 12 12 1 2 1 37 103 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 5 2 2 2 1 1 1 7 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 4 4 1 1 2 1 1 6 1 1 5 5 1 6 5 14 2 3 1 4 3 38 12 13 1 1 2 2 4 1 1 114 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 8 1 6 6 15 2 3 1 5 3 40 13 14 1 1 3 2 4 1 1 122 Harass LeftSchl FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Ref Det Theft Fighting Loiter PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 040 050 060 062 090 030 040 070 090 105 110 1 3 1 1 1 4 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 6 3 2 23 2 7 3 3 2 13 3 2 26 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 13 3 2 26 5 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 2 14 3 3 27 5SCHOOL: 012 MC CLELLAN HIGH SCHOOL I OUT OF SCHOOL LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: SANCTIONS LONG TERM' SUSMRC 6/04/97 I EXPELLED OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM Q7/^l\u0026gt;/97 WF WHT TOT BLK PAGE TOTAL WHT 22 I TOT Paging D RAPRINGS AL-DRUGS Gang Mem 2 2 2 3 123 130 150 123 CLASS 11 SUBTOTAL 6 1 1 1 52 1 15 6 1 2 1 bl 2 2 6 6 1 1 6 1 Z 1 67 2 7 8 1 2 1 74 Harass FAILOBEY Ref Ruts Battery Theft Fighting Loiter PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond AL-DRUGS Gang Mem CLASS 12 1 1 1 2 2 2 Z Z z 2 Z 3 040 060 062 020 030 040 070 090 105 110 150 123 2 2 2 3 4 1 4 2 1 2 6 3 k 1 1 1 1 SUBTOTAL 2 Z 1 18 5 2 Z 1 23 2 5 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 139 58 197 16 1 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Z 2 6 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 7 1 1 1 1 Z z 1 24 1 2 1 8 1 1 3 3 Z 6 3 4 1 b 3 1 32 20 5 3 8 2 1 3 5 210 23 233SCHOOL: 005 PARKVIEW ARTS/SCIENCE MAGNET I OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT UM UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BM DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: SANCTIONS LONG TERM I BF BLK TOT UM UF SUSMRC 6/04/97 UHT TOT BM BF EXPELLED BLK TOT UM 07/03/97 WF UHT TOT BLK PAGE TOTAL WHT 8 I TOT Fighting CLASS K 2 040 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Dis Cond CLASS 06 2 110 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Battery INSUBORD CLASS 08 2 2 020 105 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 Ref Ruis Paging D CLASS 09 1 2 062 123 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 LeftSchl FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Ref Det Smoking Foul Lan Assault Battery Theft Fighting Mischief PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Har Comm RAPRINGS AL-DRUGS CLASS 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 050 060 062 090 100 110 010 020 030 040 080 090 105 110 120 130 150 1 1 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 4 2 2 5 1 2 2 4 2 2 7 1 1 1 1 2 2 4 2 2 7 2 1 3 2 9 1 1 21 1 1 3 2 1 3 1 1 2 10 2 1 2 1 2 11 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 5 14 2 1 2 1 3 1 24 2 35 8 2 43 1 1 2 10 2 1 2 1 3 14 2 1 25 2 43 3 4 2 2 8 2 1 2 1 5 1 5 24 4 1 1 2 68 LeftSchl FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Smoking Foul Lan Assault Battery Theft Fighting PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 050 060 062 100 110 010 020 030 040 090 105 110 1 1 3 1 4 1 1 1 1 2 4 1 1 1 3 4 1 4 2 2 1 3 2 1 2 3 4 3 3 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 I, 1 1 14 1 2 16 1 1 4 3 3 6 1 1 16 1 2 1 1 t, 1 1 1 4 I, 3 22 1SCHOOL: 005 PARKVIEW ARTS/SCIENCE MAGNET I OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT WM WF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: WHT TOT BM SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 9 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 SANCTIONS I LONG TERM EXPELLED I TOTAL BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT AL-DRUGS WEAPONS1 2 3 150 091 CLASS 11 SUBTOTAL 13 9 22 2 26 4 7 4 2 33 1 1 1 1 23 4 2 34 4 2 57 MinAlter LeftSchl FAILDET Smoking Theft Fighting PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging D AL-DRUGS 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 030 050 080 100 030 040 090 105 110 123 150 1 1 CLASS 12 SUBTOTAL SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 5 1 1 3 15 53 1 1 3 2 2 1 6 1 1 3 18 1 1 16 69 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 10 72 15 1 10 2 2 1 6 1 1 3 18 1 1 3 1 1 10 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 9 2 1 I, 28 87 1 1 1 1 1 71 88 159LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 26 SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 I SANCTIONS I I OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT UM UF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM WF WHT TOT BLK UHT TOT Arson CLASS 03 3 060 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Fighting CLASS 04 2 040 SUBTOTAL 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 INSUBORD CLASS 05 2 105 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 INSUBORD CLASS 06 2 105 SUBTOTAL 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 MinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Smoking Assault Battery Theft Fighting Gambling PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Forgery Paging D AL-DRUGS Ass Staf V As Sf Extort CLASS 07 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 030 060 062 100 010 020 030 040 050 090 105 110 122 123 150 071 072 110 10 22 3 1 3 15 1 4 40 9 1 4 SUBTOTAL 1 114 1 9 1 12 5 16 5 1 1 1 52 11 31 4 1 3 27 1 9 56 14 2 5 1 1 166 1 2 1 2 1 4 1 3 1 1 3 2 1 1 4 4 3 2 5 1 1 2 3 3 1 1 1 1 11 4 15 9 2 11 1 1 1 1 11 31 4 1 3 2 3 27 1 11 56 17 2 5 1 1 1 1 178 1 4 1 1 4 5 16 12 35 5 1 4 2 3 31 1 11 61 17 2 5 1 1 1 1 194 MinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis FORGERY Assault Battery Theft Fighting Gambling False Al Loiter Mischief PROSTAFF 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 030 060 062 140 010 020 030 040 050 060 070 080 090 5 15 6 1 3 12 1 8 27 7 1 2 2 1 1 24 3 2 5 15 1 16 2 1 40 3 3 7 2 5 7 3 1 4 1 1 4 2 5 19 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 8 27 7 1 5 9 1 41 3 2 5 19 2 4 1 3 8 29 7 1 5 9 1 45 3 1 2 5 22SCHOOL: 015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL I OUT OF SCHOOL LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: SANCTIONS I LONG TERM' SUSMRC 6/04/97 EXPELLED OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM 07/03/97 I WF WHT TOT BLK PAGE TOTAL WHT 27 TOT INSUBORD Dis Cond Forgery Paging 0 FIREWORK AL-DRUGS Sale Ale V As Sf WEAPONSI In Riot Weapon Gang Mem 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 105 110 122 123 140 150 010 072 091 120 121 123 40 13 5 1 5 34 10 2 3 2 74 23 2 8 1 7 4 1 3 7 1 1 1 2 1 CLASS 08 SUBTOTAL 142 88 230 9 7 16 1 16 2 3 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 6 1 1 1 22 2 2 3 3 74 26 2 8 1 8 2 2 1 1 1 1 255 7 1 18 81 27 2 8 1 8 2 2 1 1 1 1 273 MinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Assault Battery Theft Fighting PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging D FIREWORK AL-DRUGS Ass Staf V As Sf Extort 1 1 1 2 2 2 Z 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 030 060 062 010 020 030 040 090 105 110 123 140 150 071 072 110 1 29 3 1 13 11 64 10 2 1 3 CLASS 09 SUBTOTAL 138 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 397 3 1 10 1 15 7 1 1 39 181 1 32 4 1 23 12 79 17 3 1 3 1 177 578 1 1 4 3 1 5 3 1 3 2 3 1 4 2 3 1 3 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 9 11 11 1 12 1 1 2 2 1 32 4 5 3 1 23 12 82 18 3 1 3 1 1 1 191 1 4 3 3 1 12 1 33 4 5 3 1 27 15 85 19 3 1 3 1 1 1 203 22 20 42 37 9 46 2 2 4 5 6 630 46 676SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH I OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT UM UF INSUBORD 2 105 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BM SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE n DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 SANCTIONS I I BF LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL Fighting 2 040 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ref Ruis Smoking Foul Lan Assault Battery Theft Fighting PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond Har Comm AL-DRUGS Ass Staf V As Sf 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 Z 2 2 2 2 3 3 062 100 110 010 020 030 040 090 100 105 110 120 150 071 072 5 3 8 CLASS 07 SUBTOTAL MinAlter Ref Ruis Smoking Assault Battery Theft Fighting Gambling Mischief PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond Har Comm FIREUORK AL-DRUGS Sale Ale V As Sf Pos Ueap UEAPONS1 Ueapon Gang Mem 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 030 062 100 010 020 030 040 050 080 090 100 105 110 120 140 150 010 072 090 091 121 123 1 1 1 2 18 1 17 3 1 1 1 52 1 1 4 20 1 4 59 5 1 4 1 1 8 3 7 2 25 1 8 1 13 1 1 1 1 2 3 26 4 24 5 1 1 1 77 1 1 1 4 28 1 5 72 5 1 5 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 8 1 6 1 6 1 1 1 1 4 2 1 1 5 2 1 4 4 1 1 3 3 26 4 1 24 9 3 1 1 1 6 1 20 1 1 2 1 7 1 3 20 1 1 1 1 7 1 1 21 6 1 1 1 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 84 5 2 1 2 22 11 1 2 1 3 32 I, 1 29 11 1 1 1 4 106 1 1 2 1 7 4 1 5 1 1 1 4 27 1 3 1 1 1 2 3 1 3 1 1 1 4 1 1 2 3 1 2 1 1 1 5 4 28 1 5 2 75 6 1 5 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 4 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 7 1 4 31 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 I, 5 5 35 1 1 9 2 106 7 2 1 1 4 2 1 1 2I SCHOOL: 007 DUNBAR INT'L STUDIES MAGNET JH OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT WM WF CLASS 08 SUBTOTAL 100 25 125 38 9 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: I WHT TOT 47 BM 14 SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 12 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM I WF WHT TOT BLK TOTAL WHT TOT 3 17 8 1 9 1 1 1 1 143 57 200 Smoking Battery Theft Fighting Loi ter PROSTAFF INSUBORO Dis Cond Har Comm Forgery Paging D AL-DRUGS Sale Ale Ass Staf V As Sf Pos Weap Gang Mem 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 100 020 030 040 070 090 105 110 120 122 123 150 010 071 072 090 123 1 2 13 3 30 4 9 1 3 8 3 1 1 2 22 1 6 38 7 1 7 1 3 2 1 1 1 1 CLASS 09 SUBTOTAL 1 55 1 28 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 209 78 1 1 1 1 1 1 83 287 1 16 74 2 1 2 1 7 1 1 2 3 1 1 6 3 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 22 1 6 39 9 1 2 3 7 1 6 4 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 9 25 3 4 4 3 8 2 2 4 1 1 1 4 92 1 29 2 4 2 29 1 7 13 1 1 1 6 1 Z 1 1 4 121 19 93 24 8 32 11 3 14  2 1 321 108 429SCHOOL: 013 HENDERSON JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL I OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT WM WF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: WHT TOT BM DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: SANCTIONS LONG TERM' I BF BLK TOT WM WF SUSMRC 6/04/97 WHT TOT BM BF EXPELLED BLK TOT UM 07/03/97 UF WHT TOT BLK PAGE TOTAL WHT 23 i TOT INSUBORD Weapon 2 3 105 121 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 MinAlter Harass LeftSchl FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Foul Lan Assault Battery Theft Fighting Gambling Mischief PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond Har Comm Paging D AL-DRUGS Arson Ass Staf V As Sf FIREARM1 Pos Weap WEAPONSI Gang Mem 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 030 040 050 060 062 110 010 020 030 040 050 080 090 100 105 110 120 123 150 060 071 072 081 090 091 123 2 1 1 I, It 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 5 5 2 1 1 1 CLASS 07 SUBTOTAL MinAlter LeftSchl FAILOBEY Ref Ruis FAILDET Smoking Foul Lan Battery Theft Fighting Gambling Loiter Mischief 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 030 050 060 062 080 100 110 020 030 040 050 070 080 1 1 23 1 2 9 2 36 1 1 1 1 92 8 2 3 30 1 6 1 3 7 4 2 3 5 2 1 1 I, 1 1 1 23 1 1 2 11 6 3 1 1 I, 28 1 4 10 3 40 2 1 2 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 115 9 3 5 41 1 12 1 3 10 4 1 2 10 4 1 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 1 1 1 14 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 11 2 2 13 1 1 3 1 1 5 5 2 1 1 1 1 !t 2^ 1 4 10 6 41 3 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 128 9 3 5 41 1 12 1 3 10 4 1 2 4 4 1 1 1 1 15 2 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 3 1 2 5 5 3 1 1 4 33 1 It 10 6 45 4 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 143 11 4 6 1 1 13 1 3 11 5 1 2SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL ! OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT UM UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BM SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 15 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 SANCTIONS LONG TERM I I BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK WHT TOT LeftSchl PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond AL-DRUGS 1 2 2 2 2 050 090 105 110 150 1 1 CLASS 02 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 3 2 4 1 1 1 3 1 7 1 1 INSUBORD 2 105 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 8 1 1 MinAlter Harass Ref Ruis Ref Det Foul Lan Assault Battery Theft Fighting Mischief PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond Har Comm Forgery Paging D AL-DRUGS Arson V As Sf Pos Ueap WEAPONS1 Gang Hem 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 030 040 062 090 110 010 020 030 040 080 090 100 105 110 120 122 123 150 060 072 090 091 123 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 CLASS 07 SUBTOTAL Harass LeftSchl Ref Ruis FAILDET Ref Det Foul Lan Assault Battery Theft Fighting 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 040 050 062 080 090 110 010 020 030 040 1 12 1 3 4 39 11 4 1 1 1 12 3 13 4 5 1 1 2 1 24 1 6 4 52 15 9 2 2 3 5 2 7 1 7 2 1 2 6 2 2 13 2 2 1 1 1 2 3 3 1 24 1 6 4 52 15 9 2 2 3 1 2 7 2 2 13 2 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 88 44 132 18 12 30 1 5 7 2 1 5 9 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 5 142 1 1 31 2 1 1 1 3 5 3 1 31 1 8 6 65 17 9 2 2 3 1 3 1 2 5 173 1 22 1 6 4 1 6 26 1 4 1 5 1 6 26 1 5 1 4 5 1 1 1 1 14 1 11 2 1 25 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 5 1 4 1 25 1 2 1 6 31 1 1 5 1 4 1 27I SCHOOL: 009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT WM WF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: I WHT TOT BM SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 16 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED I TOTAL BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT Gambling Mischief PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Har Comm Forgery Paging D AL-DRUGS Ass Staf V As Sf WEAPONSI WEAPONS2 In Riot Gang Mem 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 050 080 090 105 no 120 122 123 150 071 072 091 092 120 123 1 1 11 41 4 3 1 8 1 CLASS 08 SUBTOTAL 1 113 4 25 4 3 1 1 1 65 1 1 15 66 8 6 1 1 8 1 1 1 14 4 3 1 17 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 178 1 26 6 1 32 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 7 3 10 1 1 1 1 15 66 8 6 1 1 9 2 4 1 1 2 1 189 1 17 4 1 1 32 1 1 16 83 12 6 1 1 10 2 4 1 1 2 2 221 MinAlter Ref Ruis Bus Regs Foul Lan Assault Battery Theft Fighting Gambling Mischief PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond Har Comm Forgery Paging D FIREWORK AL-DRUGS Ass Staf V As Sf Pos Weap WEAPONS2 In Riot 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 030 062 070 110 010 020 030 040 050 080 090 100 105 110 120 122 123 140 150 071 072 090 092 120 1 9 1 1 2 2 2 6 1 6 56 9 3 3 3 1 7 1 1 CLASS 09 SUBTOTAL 115 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 320 1 1 8 1 9 18 8 2 48 161 1 10 1 2 2 2 2 14 1 1 15 74 17 3 3 5 1 7 1 1 163 481 3 2 1 11 3 2 5 1 1 1 23 68 7 25 3 2 1 16 4 2 2 30 93 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 3 1 5 1 1 6 2 2 1 3 4 1 10 1 2 2 5 2 14 1 1 15 1 74 18 3 3 5 1 7 1 1 3 1 1 173 3 1 2 1 1 16 4 2 2 32 1 13 1 2 2 6 2 16 1 2 15 2 90 22 5 3 5 1 9 1 1 3 1 1 205 19. 6 25 1 2 3  6 512 96 608SCHOOL: 013 HENDERSON JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL I OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT WM WF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: SANCT IONS LONG TERM I SUSMRC 6/04/97 EXPELLED 07/03/97 PAGE TOTAL 24 I WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM UF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond Har Comm Forgery Paging D RAPRINGS AL-DRUGS Ass Staf V As Sf Pos Weap WEAPONSl Extort Gang Mem 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 090 100 105 110 120 122 123 130 150 071 072 090 091 110 123 11 3 2 3 1 1 2 1 CLASS 08 SUBTOTAL 1 1 93 1 1 1 3 1 1 12 3 2 4 1 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 33 1 1 126 8 1 1 1 1 12 3 2 4 1 3 2 2 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 8 16 1 1 2 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 132 1 16 12 3 2 5 1 3 3 3 2 1 3 1 1 1 3 148 MinAlter LeftSchl Ref Ruis FAILDET Smoking Foul Lan Assault Battery Theft Fighting Gambling False Al Loiter M i sch i ef PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond Forgery Paging D AL-DRUGS Ass Staf V As Sf WEAPONS2 Gang Mem 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 030 050 062 080 100 110 010 020 030 040 050 060 070 080 090 100 105 110 122 123 150 071 072 092 123 3 1 1 1 2 3 2 1 17 10 1 14 4 31 16 2 1 CLASS 09 SUBTOTAL 110 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 295 1 4 1 1 11 1 7 1 1 1 3 4 2 1 28 10 4 3 1 1 1 1 1 9 16 2 1 1 1 49 105 1 1 1 5 3 1 4 1 1 5 2 2 1 1 1 7 1 1 1 3 4 It 1 28 10 1 5 3 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 23 4 47 18 1 1 3 2 2 4 1 1 1 159 400 6 1 4 42 2 8 1 4 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 10 34 1 6 7. 1 8 1 1 1 1 4 1 5 1 1 24 4 la 18 1 1 3 2 2 1 1 167 1 4 8 2 5 1 39 2 12 1 1 4 5 5 2 33 10 1 1 1 28 !, 55 20 1 1 8 2 3 1 1 206 22 64 18 7 25 5 1 6 05 4 429 70 499LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 28 SCHOOL: 016 HABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 I SANCTIONS I I OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT UM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT Dis Cond CLASS 04 2 110 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Fighting CLASS 06 2 040 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 MinAlter Harass LeftSchl FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Smoking Foul Lan Tardies Assault Battery Theft Fighting PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging D AL-DRUGS Pos Weap Weapon CLASS 07 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 030 040 050 060 062 100 110 133 010 020 030 040 090 105 110 123 150 090 121 1 1 1 1 SUBTOTAL 8 8 1 2 6 2 1 14 10 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 10 1 3 1 2 1 1 20 1 1 4 2 1 22 1 4 1 1 42 2 1 8 3 1 4 1 1 5 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 2 2 4 1 1 51 1 39 1 90 12 2 14 4 5 9 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 42 2 1 12 3 2 1 1 100 1 1 1 5 1 1 14 1 1 1 16 11 1 4 1 3 3 1 47 3 1 12 4 2 1 1 114 MinAlter Harass LeftSchl FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Smoking Foul Lan Assault Fighting Mischief PROSTAFF Dis Cond Har Comm Paging D RAPRINGS AL-DRUGS V As Sf WEAPONSI 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 030 040 050 060 062 100 110 010 040 080 090 110 120 123 130 150 072 091 4 4 15 1 3 8 1 3 1 1 3 2 7 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 7 6 9 3 24 1 3 11 3 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 24 1 3 13 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 4 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 8 10 1 1 2 28 1 3 14 1 1 1 5 3 1SCHOOL: 016 MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL I OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT UM UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BM SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 29 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 SANCTIONS LONG TERM I I BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF EXPELLED TOTAL Gang Mem CLASS 08 3 123 SUBTOTAL 39 1 20 1 59 15 1 16 4 4 2 2 3 BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT 3 1 1 1 66 19 1 85 FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Smoking Foul Lan Tardies Assault Battery Theft Fighting PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Har Comm AL-DRUGS Ass Staf Ueapon ROBBERY CLASS 09 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 060 062 100 110 133 010 020 030 040 090 105 110 120 150 071 121 130 8 7 4 1 1 1 2 2 16 5 6 20 2 4 1 17 3 4 10 11 4 2 1 1 2 2 33 5 9 24 2 1 2 1 1 3 SUBTOTAL SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 4 1 5 2 1 1 77 32 109 8 6 168 91 259 35 9 2 2 2 1 3 1 1 5 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 14 1 2 7 2 1 2 9 1 1 44 16 7 23 3 3 1 1 1 1 2 2  6 1 1 10 11 4 2 1 1 5 2 33 5 9 25 7 1 2 2 120 288 2 2 1 5 1 1 2 1 15 48 10 11 6 4 1 2 5 2 38 5 10 26 2 8 1 2 2 135 336LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 5 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 SCHOOL: 003 MANN MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET I OUT OF SCHOOL SANCTIONS LONG TERM I I OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF EXPELLED TOTAL Dis Cond CLASS 03 2 110 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 Fighting 2 040 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 Battery Theft Fighting PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond Har Comm Paging D Ueapon 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 020 030 040 090 100 105 110 120 123 121 2 1 9 1 3 3 1 12 CLASS 07 SUBTOTAL Smoking Assault Theft Fighting False Al Mischief PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond Forgery Paging D AL-DRUGS WEAPONSI Gang Mem 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 100 010 030 040 060 080 090 100 105 110 122 123 150 091 123 CLASS 08 SUBTOTAL MinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis FAILDET Foul Lan Assault Theft Fighting PROSTAFF Ind Exp 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 030 060 062 080 110 010 030 040 090 100 23 4 1 14 9 1 2 1 37 13 1 2 1 7 2 4 1 1 1 2 7 3 4 1 1 1 1 1 39 31 70 15 2 17 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 12 1 37 14 1 2 71 1 5 1 2 1 7 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 7 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 13 3 1 7 20 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 2 20 3 1 2 2 1 1 1 28 9 37 8 1 6 1 1 1 1 14 3 3 2 40 1 1 1 1 3 2 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 9 1 1 1 12 2 1 1 2 3 1 3 3 5 5 1 1 12 2 5 2 7 3 1 4 1 1 19 3 3 19 3 2 41 15 1 2 1 90 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 14 2 1 3 7 1 1 I, 2 22 I, 1 1 3 1 1 54 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 3 1 1 4 15 2 5I LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 6 SCHOOL: 003 MANN MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET FROM DATE: I OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF OUT OF SCHOOL BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 SANCTIONS LONG TERM' BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF I EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging D AL-DRUGS CLASS 09 2 2 2 2 105 110 123 150 11 6 SUBTOTAL 25 13 2 1 1 32 24 8 1 1 57 5 2 5 2 1 1 1 1 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 94 72 166 4 18 42 1 2 10 5 20 52 6 1 7 25 9 1 1 64 5 2 5 20 30 11 1 6 84 10 1 11 1 1 2 177 54 231I SCHOOL: 010 PULASKI HEIGHTS JUNIOR HIGH OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT WM WF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: I WHT TOT BM SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 17 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED I TOTAL BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT MinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Foul Lan Battery Fighting PROSTAFF INSUSORD Dis Cond Har Conm Alcohol2 V As Sf WEAPONS2 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 030 060 062 110 020 040 090 105 110 120 020 072 092 2 2 2 3 CLASS 07 SUBTOTAL 25 1 12 8 1 1 1 1 56 1 1 12 1 2 1 21 5 2 2 1 1 37 1 13 10 1 1 2 1 77 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 5 2 2 1 1 37 1 14 10 2 1 3 1 80 1 2 3 5 2 2 1 1 37 2 16 10 2 1 3 1 83 Ref Ruis Smoking Foul Lan Battery Theft Fighting False Al Loiter PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Har Comm Forgery AL-DRUGS V As Sf Gang Mem 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 062 100 110 020 030 040 060 070 090 105 110 120 122 150 072 123 1 1 1 1 3 2 1 4 4 4 CLASS 08 SUBTOTAL Ref Ruis Smoking Battery Theft Fighting False Al Mischief PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging D 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 062 100 020 030 040 060 080 090 100 105 110 123 17 4 2 6 2 1 35 2 1 1 2 11 1 1 1 11 6 1 6 1 1 1 1 15 1 2 1 23 1 4 3 7 1 2 1 50 3 1 1 2 13 1 1 1 11 6 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 3 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 4 4 1 24 1 1 5 3 7 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 3 1 10 7 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 58 2 1 1 1 3 12 2 1 t, k 1 27 2 1 1 k 8 1 1 5 1 1 70 1 3 3 1 1 3 1 2 1 1 2 2 3 1 I, 2 13 1 1 1 2 11 6 1 1 3 1 2 1 1 4 1 5 2 16 1 2 3 2 12 6 1SCHOOL: 010 PULASKI HEIGHTS JUNIOR HIGH I OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT WM WF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: SANCTIONS I LONG TERM SUSMRC 6/04/97 EXPELLED 07/03/97 PAGE I TOTAL 18 WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT AL-DRUGS Extort Ueapon CLASS 09 2 3 3 150 110 121 5 1 6 2 SUBTOTAL 42 4 46 8 1 9 7 1 1 2 1 8 1 1 6 2 1 54 10 6 2 1 64 INSUBORD CLASS 10 2 105 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 Fighting INSUBORD CLASS 11 2 2 040 105 1 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 135 41 176 17 6 23 16 1 17 2 2 \u0026amp; 2 (J? 1 195 26 221SCHOOL: oil SOUTHWEST JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL I OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT WM WF PROSTAFF 2 090 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: WHT TOT BM SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 19 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 SANCTIONS I I BF LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT 1 1 1 1 Ref Ruis Smok i ng AL-DRUGS 1 1 2 062 100 150 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 Harass LeftSchl FAILOBEY Ref Ruis FAILDET Ref Det Foul Lan Assault Battery Fighting False Al Mischief PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging D FIREWORK AL-DRUGS Ass Staf V As Sf Pos Weap WEAPONSl 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 040 050 060 062 080 090 110 010 020 040 060 080 090 105 110 123 140 150 071 072 090 091 1 3 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 1 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CLASS 07 SUBTOTAL MinAlter LeftSchl FAILOBEY Ref Ruis FAILDET Ref Det Foul Lan Assault Battery Theft Fighting False Al Mischief 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 030 050 060 062 080 090 110 010 020 030 040 060 080 22 2 6 7 4 1 1 3 1 61 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 26 1 5 3 2 1 13 4 2 3 1 1 1 13 27 2 9 7 6 1 1 4 1 74 4 1 1 5 4 1 1 4 1 2 39 1 5 2 5 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 3 4 1 4 2 3 2 28 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 10 7 6 1 1 4 2 2 1 5 2 1 1 1 1 9 3 1 1 2 1 12 4 5 9 1 1 1 1 2 85 1 13 1 1 3 5 1 I, 2 3 2 33 2 I, 11 8 6 1 1 4 2 2 1 1 98 1 1 1 5 1 2 5 2 2 2 1 1 4 1 1 5 4 1 1 6 6 2 39 2 1 1 1 2 1 4 2 1 6 h 1 1 6 b 2 41 3 1SCHOOL: 011 SOUTHWEST JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL I OUT OF SCHOOL LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: SANCTIONS I LONG TERM SUSMRC 6/04/97 EXPELLED OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM 07/03/97 I PAGE TOTAL 20 WF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond AL-DRUGS Ass Staf V As Sf UEAPONS1 Ueapon Gang Mem CLASS 08 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 090 105 110 150 071 072 091 121 123 4 19 9 4 3 14 4 2 7 33 13 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SUBTOTAL 4 4 1 1 1 1 79 49 128 4 3 7 1 1 10 5 1 1 15 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 3 4 8 34 14 6 1 7 1 2 1 147 1 1 1 8 9 35 15 6 1 7 1 2 1 155 I MinAlter Harass LeftSchl FAILOBEY Ref Det Foul Lan Assault Battery Fighting Gambling PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond AL-DRUGS Ass Staf V As Sf Weapon Gang Mem CLASS 09 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 030 040 050 060 090 110 010 020 040 050 090 105 110 150 071 072 121 123 1 1 1 1 SUBTOTAL Ref Ruis CLASS 10 1 062 SUBTOTAL SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 1 3 1 13 2 7 10 6 2 2 49 1 1 193 1 1 1 11 2 4 2 24 87 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 2 24 2 9 14 6 4 2 73 1 1 280 1 1 3 3 1 3 1 3 1 1 1 2 4 17 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 2 7 11 13 30 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 24 10 10 34 1 1 1 3 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 24 2 11 14 6 6 1 4 1 1 86 1 1 1 1 3 2 3 1 1 12 1 1 1 2 1 1 5 6 27 2 13 17 7 7 1 4 1 1 98 1 1 3 3 1 9 323 33 356SCHOOL: 019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT WM UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE\nDISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: SANCTIONS I LONG TERM- SUSMRC 6/04/97 EXPELLED 07/03/97 I PAGE TOTAL 32 WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT Ref Ruis fighting CLASS 04 1 062 040 SUBTOTAL 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 3 4 Fighting Dis Cond WEAPONSI CLASS 05 2 2 3 040 110 091 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 I, 2 1 1 4 2 1 1 4 Ref Ruis Fighting CLASS 06 1 2 062 040 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 6 2 8 1 1 2 8 2 10LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 30 SCHOOL: 017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 I SANCTIONS I I OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT Ref Ruis Fighting Dis Cond WEAPONS2 CLASS 02 1 2 Z 3 062 040 110 092 1 1 1 1 1 1 SUBTOTAL 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 Foul Lan Fighting CLASS 03 1 2 110 040 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 z 1 1 Z Ref Ruis Fighting Dis Cond CLASS 04 1 Z Z 062 040 110 1 2 1 2 2 SUBTOTAL 3 1 4 1 1 2 2 2 1 3 4 2 2 4 1 3 4 2 3 3 8 FAILOBEY Fighting INSUBORD Dis Cond CLASS 05 1 2 2 2 060 040 105 110 1 4 SUBTOTAL 5 2 2 1 5 1 6 2 1 10 1 1 1 1 1 6 Z 1 10 1 1 Z 6 Z 1 11 FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Fighting Mischief INSUBORD Dis Cond CLASS 06 1 1 2 2 2 2 060 062 040 080 105 110 2 1 1 2 SUBTOTAL 1 2 1 6 2 3 6 3 2 4 12 1 1 1 1 1 2 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 19 12 31 1 2 1 1 3 3 2 4 12 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 4 Z 5 15 5 4 9 31 9 40SCHOOL: 022 BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT UM WF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: SANCTIONS LONG TERM SUSMRC 6/04/97 I EXPELLED 07/03/97 PAGE TOTAL 35 I WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT MinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Fighting Weapon CLASS K 1 1 1 2 3 030 060 062 040 121 SUBTOTAL 1 3 4 1 1 10 1 1 1 3 4 2 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 2 2 12 1 1 1 3 5 2 2 13 FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Assault Theft WEAPONSl CLASS 02 1 1 2 2 3 060 062 010 030 091 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 SUBTOTAL 5 1 6 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 7 1 1 2 1 4 2 1 1 9 Fighting Dis Cond CLASS 03 2 2 040 110 3 3 SUBTOTAL 3 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 3 3 1 2 3 4 2 6 MinAlter Harass LeftSchl FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Foul Lan Fighting PROSTAFF CLASS 04 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 030 040 050 060 062 110 040 090 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 SUBTOTAL 4 1 11 1 4 1 12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 3 3 4 1 12 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 2 2 1 5 1 15 FAILOBEY Fighting CLASS 05 1 2 060 040 SUBTOTAL 4 1 5 3 3 7 1 8 7 1 8 7 1 8 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 34 6 40 8 1 9 2 2 42 9 51SCHOOL: 006 BOOKER ARTS MAGNET SCHOOL I OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT UM UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: UHT TOT BM SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 10 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 SANCTIONS I LONG TERM EXPELLED I TOTAL BF BLK TOT WM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT MinAlter CLASS K 1 030 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 MinAlter Ref Ruis Bus Regs Assault INSUBORD Dis Cond CLASS 01 1 1 1 2 2 2 030 062 070 010 105 110 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 3 3 1 10 1 1 1 3 3 1 10 1 1 1 3 3 1 10 1 1 1 3 3 1 10 INSUBORD Dis Cond 2 2 105 110 CLASS 02 SUBTOTAL 2 1 3 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 3 1 4 FAILOBEY Assault INSUBORD Dis Cond 1 2 2 2 060 010 105 110 1 1 1 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL 3 2 2 1 1 1 2 5 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 5 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 7 Bus Regs Foul Lan Assault Fighting Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond Har Conm 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 070 110 010 040 100 105 110 120 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 1 15 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 1 15 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 1 15 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 4 3 1 16 Assault Fighting Har Conn) 2 2 2 010 040 120 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 MinAlter Assault Fighting INSUBORD Dis Cond 1 2 2 2 2 030 010 040 105 110 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 4 2 6 1 1 1 1 2 6 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 8 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 38 4 42 5 2 7 42 7 49SCHOOL: 018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT WM WF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: SANCTIONS LONG TERM SUSMRC 6/04/97 I EXPELLED 07/03/97 PAGE TOTAL 31 I WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT Dis Cond CLASS K 2 110 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ass Staf CLASS 01 3 071 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 RAPRINGS WEAPONSI CLASS 02 2 3 130 091 1 1 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Fighting CLASS 03 1 1 2 060 062 040 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 4 1 1 2 1 2 5 Bus Regs Fighting Dis Cond RAPRINGS CLASS 04 1 2 2 2 070 040 110 130 1 2 SUBTOTAL 1 4 1 1 1 2 1 1 5 1 2 1 1 5 1 2 1 1 5 RAPRINGS CLASS 05 2 130 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 FAILOBEY Foul Lan Fighting RAPRINGS CLASS 06 1 1 2 2 060 110 040 130 SUBTOTAL 1 2 1 1 5 1 2 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 5 1 1 2 2 3 1 1 7 Ref Ruis CLASS 09 1 062 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 15 3 18 1 3 4 1 1 19 4 23LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 34 SCHOOL: 021 CARVER MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF OUT OF SCHOOL BLK TOT UM WF WHT TOT BM SANCTIONS LONG TERM' I I EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM WF WHT TOT BLK UHT TOT Battery CLASS 01 2 020 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 INSUBORD FIREUORK CLASS 02 2 2 105 140 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 2 1 3 MinAlter Fighting INSUBORD CLASS 03 1 2 2 030 040 105 SUBTOTAL 1 2 1 4 1 2 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 4 1 1 2 2 1 5 MinAlter Ref Ruis Theft Fighting Mischief CLASS 04 1 1 2 2 2 030 062 030 040 080 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 5 MinAlter Ref Ruis Fighting PROSTAFF INSUBORD Har Comm FIREWORK CLASS 05 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 030 062 040 090 105 120 140 SUBTOTAL 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 9 2 1 3 1 2 3 1 3 1 1 12 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 3 1 1 12 1 1 2 2 3 1 J 1 1 13 MinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Battery Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond RAPRINGS CLASS 06 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 030 060 062 020 100 105 110 130 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 SUBTOTAL SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 4 1 5 1 1 1 6 1 1 1 6 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 6 1 1 1 6 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 12 25 4 29 8 8 2 2 31 8 39LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 41 SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 I SANCTIONS I OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED I TOTAL BLK TOT UH UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT Ref Ruis Battery INSUBORD CLASS K 1 2 2 062 020 105 SUBTOTAL 3 3 1 1 1 3 4 1 1 1 1 1 3 It 1 1 1 1 3 5 INSUBORD Dis Cond RAPRINGS CLASS 01 2 2 2 105 110 130 SUBTOTAL 2 1 1 4 2 1 1 It 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 4 1 1 3 1 1 5 MinAlter Ref Ruis Assault Battery INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging D RAPRINGS Arson Pos Ueap CLASS 02 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 030 062 010 020 105 no 123 130 060 090 3 7 2 1 10 3 2 3 10 2 1 12 1 1 1 1 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 5 1 5 1 3 10 2 1 12 1 1 25 5 30 1 9 1 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 31 1 9 3 11 3 1 17 1 1 1 1 1 40 MinAlter Ref Ruis Assault PROSTAFF INSUBORD Ass Staf UEAPONSl CLASS 03 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 030 062 010 090 105 071 091 7 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 SUBTOTAL 1 15 1 15 2 2 1 1 1 1 7 2 1 2 2 1 1 16 1 1 2 8 2 1 2 3 1 1 18 MinAlter Ref Ruis Assault Theft Fighting PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond UEAPONSl CLASS 04 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 030 062 010 030 040 090 100 105 110 091 3 2 3 1 6 3 3 3 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 3 1 3 6 3 1 1 1 3 1 12 4 1 16 7 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 3 2 9 1 1 1 17 1 1 9 9 3 1 1 2 3 2 3 1 1 26 MinAlter FAILOBEY 1 1 030 060 1 3 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 5 2SCHOOL: 028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: SUSMRC 6/04/97 I I SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF 07/03/97 I PAGE 42 OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT Ref Ruis Assault Fighting PROSTAFF INSUBORD Paging D Ass Staf WEAPONSI CLASS 05 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 062 010 040 090 105 123 071 091 3 3 SUBTOTAL 4 6 8 1 2 1 6 6 9 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 23 1 8 1 31 6 6 1 1 2 2 3 1 6 6 9 1 1 1 33 2 2 6 3 1 8 6 11 1 1 1 39 MinAlter Ref Ruis Assault Theft fighting PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Har Comm CLASS 06 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 030 062 010 030 040 090 105 110 120 1 3 1 9 6 3 SUBTOTAL 23 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 105 1 2 2 1 6 24 1 3 1 1 9 2 8 3 1 29 129 1 1 1 1 3 28 3 1 1 3 31 5 5 1 3 1 1 9 2 8 3 1 29 1 1 1 3 1 4 1 1 10 2 9 3 1 32 134 31 165SCHOOL: 031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT WM WF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: I WHT TOT BM SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 45 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 SANCTIONS LONG TERM I EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT FAILOBEY Assault CLASS 01 1 2 060 010 1 1 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Fighting CLASS 04 2 040 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 FAILOBEY Battery Fighting CLASS 05 1 2 2 060 020 040 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 FAILOBEY Battery Fighting Dis Cond WEAPONSI CLASS 06 1 2 2 2 3 060 020 040 110 091 2 3 5 2 3 5 1 1 SUBTOTAL 1 11 1 11 1 1 2 3 5 1 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 16 16 2 2 1 11 1 2 3 3 5 1 1 13 3 3 16 3 19LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 46 SCHOOL: 032 DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 I SANCT IONS I I OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT FAILOBEY CLASS K 1 060 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Theft Dis Cond CLASS 01 2 2 030 110 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 INSUBORD Dis Cond CLASS 02 2 2 105 110 1 1 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 INSUBORD Dis Cond CLASS 03 2 2 105 110 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 Ref Ruis Theft INSUBORD Dis Cond CLASS 04 1 2 2 2 062 030 105 110 SUBTOTAL 2 1 1 3 7 2 1 1 3 7 2 1 1 5 7 2 1 1 3 7 Assault Fighting CLASS 05 2 2 010 040 1 1 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 3 Ref Ruis Assault Battery Fighting Dis Cond CLASS 06 1 2 2 2 2 062 010 020 040 110 SUBTOTAL 2 1 1 3 2 9 2 1 1 3 2 9 1 1 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 22 22 1 1 2 1 1 3 2 9 1 1 3 1 1 3 2 10 4 4 1 1 23 4 27SCHOOL: 023 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: SUSMRC 6/04/97 I I SANCTIONS OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED 07/03/97 I PAGE TOTAL 36 BLK TOT WM UF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT Dis Cond CLASS K 2 110 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Fighting PROSTAFF INSUBORD Ass Staf CLASS 01 2 2 2 3 040 090 105 071 SUBTOTAL 2 1 1 1 5 2 1 1 1 5 2 1 1 1 5 2 1 1 1 5 Bus Regs Fighting PROSTAFF Dis Cond CLASS 02 1 2 2 2 070 040 090 110 SUBTOTAL 1 1 3 1 6 1 1 3 1 6 2 2 2 2 1 1 3 1 6 2 2 1 3 3 1 8 Assault Fighting PROSTAFF INSUBORD CLASS 03 2 2 2 2 010 040 090 105 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Assault Theft Fighting INSUBORD Dis Cond CLASS 04 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 060 062 010 030 040 105 110 1 1 1 1 1 1 SUBTOTAL 3 1 6 1 1 1 4 I, 2 1 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 2 1 10 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 4 3 1 12 Fighting PROSTAFF Har Comm CLASS 05 2 2 2 040 090 120 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 4 1 1 2 I, 1 1 2 4 1 1 2 4 PROSTAFF INSUBORD CLASS 06 2 2 090 105 1 1 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 3 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 25 4 29 6 2 8 29 8 37SCHOOL: 024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT WM WF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: WHT TOT BM SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 37 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT I WEAPONSI CLASS K 3 091 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ref Ruis CLASS 02 1 062 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 FAILOBEY Fighting CLASS 03 1 2 060 040 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 Ref Ruis CLASS 04 1 062 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ref Ruis Fighting PROSTAFF Dis Cond CLASS 05 1 2 2 2 062 040 090 110 2 2 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 4 2 1 5 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 6 2 1 2 1 6 FAILOBEY Ref Ruis PROSTAFF Arson WEAPONS2 CLASS 06 1 1 2 3 3 060 062 090 060 092 4 2 3 1 7 2 1 1 1 7 2 1 1 SUBTOTAL 1 7 4 1 11 1 1 1 2 2 1 11 2 8 2 1 1 1 13 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 10 11 21 2 2 1 1 22 2 24LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 38 SCHOOL: 025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 I SANCTIONS I ! OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT Ref Ruis UEAPONSl CLASS K 1 3 062 091 1 1 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Assault CLASS 01 2 010 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Assault Theft INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging 0 V As Sf CLASS 02 2 2 2 2 2 3 010 030 105 110 123 072 SUBTOTAL 1 3 1 1 1 7 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 8 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 9 Assault Battery INSUBORD Dis Cond Ass Staf CLASS 03 2 2 2 2 3 010 020 105 110 071 SUBTOTAL 1 2 4 3 2 12 1 2 4 3 2 12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 5 3 2 13 1 1 1 2 5 3 3 14 Assault INSUBORD Har Comm Ass Staf CLASS 04 2 2 2 3 010 105 120 071 1 1 SUBTOTAL 2 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 6 1 2 1 2 6 Assault Fighting Mischief INSUBORD Dis Cond Har Comm AL-DRUGS CLASS 05 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 010 040 080 105 110 120 150 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 9 3 1 1 17 1 1 1 9 3 1 1 17 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 3 1 1 18 1 1 1 10 3 1 1 18 Fighting INSUBORO Dis Cond Har Comn CLASS 06 2 2 2 2 040 105 110 120 1 1 1 1 SUBTOTAL 3 2 3 2 1 1 2 6 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 6 2 2 2 1 3 2 8 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 42 8 50 4 1 5 2 1 3 53 5 58I SCHOOL: 048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT UM UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: I UHT TOT BM SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 64 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 SANCTIONS LONG TERM EXPELLED I TOTAL BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT Ref Ruis INSUBORD Dis Cond CLASS 01 1 2 2 062 105 110 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 2 1 4 MinAlter Ref Ruis INSUBORD Dis Cond Har Comm CLASS 02 1 1 2 2 2 030 062 105 110 120 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 3 1 8 1 1 2 3 1 8 1 1 2 3 1 8 1 1 2 3 1 8 LeftSchl Fighting Loiter INSUBORD Dis Cond Har Comm CLASS 03 1 2 2 2 2 2 050 040 070 105 110 120 SUBTOTAL 1 4 1 2 1 1 10 1 1 2 1 5 1 2 2 1 12 1 5 1 2 2 1 12 1 5 1 2 2 1 12 Foul Lan Fighting INSUBORO Pos Ueap CLASS 04 1 2 2 3 110 040 105 090 1 2 1 SUBTOTAL 4 1 1 1 2 1 1 5 1 2 1 1 5 1 2 1 1 5 Fighting INSUBORD Dis Cond CLASS 05 2 2 2 040 105 110 SUBTOTAL 2 2 4 2 3 1 6 2 5 3 10 1 1 1 1 2 5 3 10 1 1 2 5 4 11 Harass Ref Ruis Theft Fighting INSUBORD Dis Cond Har Comm FIREUORK CLASS 06 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 040 062 030 040 105 110 120 140 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 5 3 1 1 2 15 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 6 4 1 1 2 18 1 2 1 6 4 1 1 2 18 1 2 1 b b 1 1 2 18 Dis Cond CLASS 07 2 no SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 44 13 57 1 1 2 57 2 59I SCHOOL: 026 GARLAND INCENTIVE SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT UM WF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: I SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 39 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 SANCTIONS LONG TERM' EXPELLED I TOTAL WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF WHT TOT BLK UHT TOT INSUBORD CLASS 03 2 105 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 INSUBORD Ass Staf WEAPONSI CLASS 05 2 3 3 105 071 091 1 1 1 1 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 Paging D Ass Staf Pos Weap CLASS 06 2 3 3 123 071 090 1 1 1 1 SUBTOTAL 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 MinAlter CLASS 07 1 030 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 3 2 5 1 1 2 2 7 1 8SCHOOL: 037 GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY I OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT WM UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BT REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: SANCTIONS I LONG TERM SUSMRC 6/04/97 EXPELLED 07/03/97 I PAGE TOTAL 51 WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT Dis Cond CLASS K 2 110 SUBTOTAL 2 2 2 2 2 2 Dis Cond CLASS 01 2 2 2 110 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 Dis Cond CLASS 02 2 2 2 3 3 Dis Cond CLASS 03 110 SUBTOTAL 4 6 6 10 10 10 10 10 10 2 110 SUBTOTAL r 7 2 2 9 9 9 9 Theft CLASS 04 2 030 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 9 1 1 Assault Dis Cond CLASS 05 2 2 010 110 SUBTOTAL 2 4 b 2 b 6 2 4 b 2 6 MinAlter Assault Dis Cond CLASS 06 1 2 2 030 010 110 SUBTOTAL 4 4 2 1 2 5 2 1 6 9 2 2 2 2 2 1 6 9 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 2 2 2 1 8 11 24 14 38 3 1 4 38 4 42LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 40 SCHOOL: 027 GIBBS MAGNET SCHOOL FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 I SANCTIONS I ! OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM' EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT UM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT FIREWORK CLASS 02 2 140 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 MinAlter CLASS 06 1 030 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 2 2LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 44 SCHOOL: 030 JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF I OUT OF SCHOOL BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM SANCTIONS LONG TERM ( EXPELLED TOTAL I BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF Ref Ruts CLASS 02 1 UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT 062 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 Ref Ruts Theft CLASS 05 1 2 062 030 2 1 1 SUBTOTAL 2 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 UEAPONS1 CLASS 06 3 091 2 1 3 2 1 3 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 3 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 4 1 5LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 49 SCHOOL: 035 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. ELEMENTARY FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 I SANCTIONS I OUT OF SCHOOL I LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT UM WF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT INSUBORD CLASS K 2 105 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Fighting INSUBORO Dis Cond Paging D CLASS 01 2 2 2 2 040 105 110 123 SUBTOTAL 2 2 1 1 6 2 2 1 1 6 2 2 1 1 6 2 2 1 1 6 INSUBORD Dis Cond CLASS 02 2 2 105 110 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 3 UEAPONS1 CLASS 03 3 091 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Assault Theft Fighting Ind Exp INSUBORD CLASS 04 2 2 2 2 2 010 030 040 100 105 1 1 SUBTOTAL 2 1 6 10 1 1 3 1 6 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 6 11 1 1 2 1 1 4 1 6 13 LeftSchl FAILOBEY Assault Theft Fighting INSUBORD Dis Cond FIREUORK CLASS 05 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 050 060 010 030 040 105 110 140 1 1 SUBTOTAL 2 1 3 1 8 1 1 1 1 4 1 3 1 k 1 1 12 1 1 1 3 1 3 1 5 5 1 3 1 4 1 1 12 1 3 1 5 1 1 1 3 4 5 1 1 17 Battery PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging D V As Sf Gang Mem CLASS 06 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 020 090 105 110 123 072 123 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 4 SUBTOTAL 5 1 6 1 7 1 7 2 2 1 1 1 1 4 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 30 6 36 15 3 18 6 1 7 1 1 6 2 1 1 1 13 36 18 54LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 61 SCHOOL: 046 MABELVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 I SANCTIONS I OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM' EXPELLED TOTAL I BLK TOT UM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT FAILOBEY INSUBORD V As Sf CLASS K 1 2 3 060 105 072 2 1 2 1 1 1 SUBTOTAL 3 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 2 1 3 1 1 1 3 3 2 1 6 INSUBORD FIREWORK CLASS 01 2 2 105 140 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Theft Fighting Dis Cond CLASS 02 1 1 2 2 2 060 062 030 040 110 SUBTOTAL 1 3 1 1 1 7 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 8 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 3 2 3 1 1 1 8 1 2 3 3 3 1 1 3 11 MinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Assault Dis Cond FIREWORK CLASS 03 1 1 1 2 2 2 030 060 062 010 110 140 SUBTOTAL 1 3 3 6 4 1 18 1 1 2 1 4 4 6 4 1 20 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 3 2 5 1 4 6 k 1 20 1 1 3 5 1 4 5 7 1 1 25 MinAlter FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Foul Lan Assault Fighting Mischief Dis Cond V As Sf CLASS 04 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 030 060 062 110 010 040 080 110 072 2 2 2 1 2 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 12 1 1 5 7 2 2 2 2 3 5 1 1 1 19 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 5 1 1 1 19 1 1 2 2 3 2 3 5 1 1 1 20 Ref Ruis Assault Theft Fighting PROSTAFF INSUBORD RAPRINGS FIREWORK CLASS 05 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 Z 062 010 030 040 090 105 130 140 1 4 2 2 SUBTOTAL 1 1 9 1 1 4 1 4 2 2 1 1 1 1 13 1 1 1 1 1 I, 2 2 1 1 1 1 13 1 1 1 5 2 2 1 1 1 1 14SCHOOL: 046 MABELVALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT WM WF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: SANCTIONS LONG TERM' I SUSMRC 6/04/97 EXPELLED 07/03/97 PAGE TOTAL 62 WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT FAILOBEY Ref Ruts Foul Lan Assault Theft Fighting Dis Cond Forgery Paging D FIREWORK Gang Mem CLASS 06 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 060 062 110 010 030 040 110 122 123 140 123 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 5 4 1 SUBTOTAL 2 1 10 9 2 1 19 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 5 4 1 1 1 2 1 19 1 1 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 2 1 5 4 1 1 2 1 20 60 23 83 9 6 15 83 15 98LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 33 SCHOOL: 020 MCDERMOTT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 I SANCTIONS I OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM' EXPELLED TOTAL I BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT Theft PROSTAFF Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond Pos Weap CLASS 02 2 2 2 2 2 3 030 090 100 105 110 090 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SUBTOTAL 4 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 INSUBORD CLASS 03 2 105 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Fighting INSUBORD Dis Cond CLASS 04 2 2 2 040 105 110 1 1 SUBTOTAL 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 4 FAILOBEY Fighting PROSTAFF INSUBORO Dis Cond CLASS 05 1 2 2 2 2 060 040 090 105 110 SUBTOTAL 1 2 1 1 1 6 1 1 2 1 3 1 2 1 8 1 3 1 2 1 8 1 3 1 2 1 8 Ref Ruis Fighting Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond CLASS 06 1 2 2 2 2 062 040 100 105 110 SUBTOTAL 1 3 1 1 1 7 2 1 1 4 1 5 1 2 2 11 1 5 1 2 2 11 1 5 1 2 2 11 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 20 8 28 1 1 1 1 29 1 30LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 47 SCHOOL: 033 MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 I SANCTIONS I I OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT UM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT INSUBORD CLASS K 2 105 SUBTOTAL 4 4 4 I, 4 I, 4 4 Theft INSUBORD CLASS 01 2 2 030 105 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 Mischief INSUBORD CLASS 02 2 2 080 105 SUBTOTAL 1 3 4 2 2 1 5 6 1 5 6 1 5 6 Ref Ruis CLASS 03 1 062 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Assault INSUBORO Dis Cond CLASS 04 2 2 2 010 105 110 SUBTOTAL 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 It 1 2 1 4 Assault Fighting PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond CLASS 05 2 2 2 2 2 010 040 090 105 110 2 2 1 1 SUBTOTAL 5 2 9 5 2 9 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 4 2 5 2 9 1 1 1 1 4 1 2 1 6 3 13 Theft Fighting Loi ter INSUBORD Dis Cond CLASS 06 2 2 2 2 Z 030 040 070 105 110 SUBTOTAL 4 1 1 1 7 1 1 It 1 2 1 8 1 1 1 1 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 30 3 33 2 4 8 1 2 4 It 1 2 1 8 1 1 2 t. 1 5 1 2 3 12 9 33 9 42SCHOOL: 034 MITCHELL INCENTIVE SCHOOL I OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT WM WF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: SANCTIONS LONG TERM' SUSMRC 6/04/97 I EXPELLED Ass Staf CLASS K 3 071 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 07/03/97 PAGE TOTAL 48 WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT Arson CLASS 03 3 060 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Dis Cond Ass Staf V As Sf CLASS 06 2 3 3 110 071 072 1 1 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 3 3 5 5SCHOOL: 050 OTTER CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT WM WF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: WHT TOT BM SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 65 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 SANCTIONS I I BF LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT INSUBORD Dis Cond CLASS 01 2 2 105 110 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 INSUBORO CLASS 02 2 105 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 INSUBORD Dis Cond CLASS 06 2 2 105 110 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 4 1 5 5 5LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 52 SCHOOL: 038 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 OUT OF SCHOOL SANCTIONS I I OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT UM WF WHT TOT BM BF LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK UHT TOT Fighting Ind Exp Dis Cond CLASS K 2 2 2 040 100 110 SUBTOTAL 1 1 5 7 1 1 5 7 1 1 5 7 1 1 5 7 Dis Cond RAPRINGS WEAPONSI CLASS 01 2 2 3 110 130 091 3 1 SUBTOTAL 4 1 1 3 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 6 4 1 1 6 FAILOBEY Dis Cond WEAPONS2 CLASS 02 1 2 3 060 110 092 8 3 3 8 SUBTOTAL 8 3 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 8 11 1 1 2 3 9 1 13 Fighting Dis Cond CLASS 03 2 2 040 110 SUBTOTAL 1 4 5 1 1 1 5 6 1 1 1 1 1 5 6 1 1 1 6 7 Fighting Dis Cond Paging D Pos Weap CLASS 04 2 2 2 3 040 110 123 090 6 2 1 5 1 11 2 1 1 SUBTOTAL 8 6 14 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 2 1 15 1 1 1 12 2 1 16 MinAlter Ref Ruis Assault Fighting Loi ter Ind Exp Dis Cond CLASS 05 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 030 062 010 040 070 100 110 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 SUBTOTAL 2 6 1 5 9 1 7 15 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 7 15 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 16 MinAlter FAILOBEY Smoking Theft Fighting False Al Ind Exp INSUBORD Dis Cond AL-DRUGS CLASS 06 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 030 060 100 030 040 060 100 105 110 150 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 SUBTOTAL 1 5 1 2 1 14 1 3 5 1 5 1 3 4 19 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 5 1 3 4 19 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 5 1 3 4 20SCHOOL: 038 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY I OUT OF SCHOOL LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE\nDISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: SANCTIONS ) SUSMRC 6/04/97 LONG TERM EXPELLED OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM 07/03/97 WF WHT TOT BLK PAGE TOTAL WHT 53 I TOT Dis Cond CLASS 09 2 110 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Dis Cond CLASS 11 2 110 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 54 25 79 5 1 6 2 2 81 6 87LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 54 FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 SCHOOL: 039 RIGHTSELL INCENTIVE SCHOOL I SANCTIONS I I OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT Fighting Mischi ef INSUBORD CLASS K 2 2 2 040 080 105 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 FAILOBEY Fighting False Al INSUBORD CLASS 01 1 2 2 2 060 040 060 105 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 4 3 1 4 1 4 1 2 8 1 4 1 2 8 1 4 1 2 8 Fighting INSUBORD 2 2 040 105 CLASS 02 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 Fighting PROSTAFF 2 2 040 090 4 4 4 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL 4 4 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 4 1 5 Dis Cond 2 110 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 FAILOBEY Fighting PROSTAFF 1 2 2 060 040 090 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 1 2 1 1, 1 2 1 1 2 1 I, 1 2 1 Fighting 2 040 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 Fighting 2 040 CLASS 07 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 19 6 25 1 1 25 1 26SCHOOL: 036 ROCKEFELLER INCENTIVE SCHOOL I OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT UM UF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: SANCTIONS LONG TERM SUSMRC 6/04/97 EXPELLED 07/03/97 PAGE TOTAL I 50 UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BLK UHT TOT FAILOBEY Ref Ruis INSUBORO Dis Cond CLASS K 1 1 2 2 060 062 105 110 SUBTOTAL 2 4 1 7 1 1 2 4 2 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 4 2 8 1 1 2 1 2 5 2 10 FAILOBEY PROSTAFF CLASS 01 1 2 060 090 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 FAILOBEY Ref Ruis INSUBORD CLASS 02 1 1 2 060 062 105 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 2 1 2 5 MinAlter FAILOBEY Fighting INSUBORO CLASS 03 1 1 2 2 030 060 040 105 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 1 2 I, 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 3 7 FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Fighting INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging D CLASS 04 1 1 2 2 2 2 060 062 040 105 110 123 1 1 SUBTOTAL 3 2 1 1 7 1 2 3 3 1 1 9 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 1 1 9 1 1 2 1 1 3 4 1 1 11 Ref Ruis Fighting INSUBORD CLASS 05 1 2 2 062 040 105 SUBTOTAL 2 1 3 I 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 2 1 4 FAILOBEY Ref Ruis INSUBORD Dis Cond Paging D CLASS 06 1 1 2 2 2 060 062 105 110 123 1 1 2 1 1 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 3 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 25 5 30 5 6 16 1 3 4 6 6 3 1 1 2 1 10 1 1 1 3 7 3 11 1 2 7 3 1 14 22 1 1 30 23 53LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 55 SCHOOL: 040 ROMINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 I SANCTIONS I I OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT UM UF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM WF WHT TOT BLK UHT TOT Assault Battery CLASS K 2 2 010 020 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 Ind Exp CLASS 02 2 100 SUBTOTAL 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Battery INSUBORD CLASS 03 2 2 020 105 2 2 SUBTOTAL 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 3 Assault INSUBORD Pos Weap CLASS 04 2 2 3 010 105 090 1 1 1 1 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 5 MinAlter FAILOBEY Assault INSUBORD CLASS 05 1 1 2 2 030 060 010 105 1 1 SUBTOTAL 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 4 Assault Battery Fighting CLASS 06 2 2 2 010 020 040 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 4 1 1 2 4 1 1 2 4 1 1 2 4 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 9 3 12 6 6 12 6 18I SCHOOL: 047 TERRY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT WM WF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: I WHT TOT BM SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 63 DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 SANCTIONS LONG TERM' EXPELLED I TOTAL BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT INSUBORD Ass Staf Pos Weap CLASS K 2 3 3 105 071 090 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 Paging D CLASS 01 2 123 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 INSUBORD 2 105 CLASS 02 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Fighting INSUBORD WEAPONSl 2 2 3 040 105 091 1 2 1 2 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL 1 2 3 2 2 2 2 1 2 3 2 2 1 2 2 5 FAILOBEY Theft INSUBORD 1 2 2 060 030 105 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 5 5 1 1 1 5 6 1 1 1 1 1 5 6 1 1 1 1 5 7 Foul Lan Battery Theft fighting INSUBORD RAPRINGS 1 2 2 2 2 2 110 020 030 040 105 130 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 1 2 2 2 1 1 9 1 2 2 2 1 1 9 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 9 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 10 MinAlter Fighting PROSTAFF INSUBORD Har Conm Paging D FIREWORK 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 030 040 090 105 120 123 140 1 1 1 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 3 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 21 1 2 3 7 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 6 1 2 4 1 2 4 1 1 6 1 2 I, 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 10 28 9 9 28 9 37LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 66 SCHOOL: 051 WAKEFIELD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FROM DATE\nDISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF WEAPONSI CLASS 05 3 091 SUBTOTAL 1 1 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 1 I OUT OF SCHOOL SANCTIONS LONG TERM I I EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 56 SCHOOL: 042 WASHINGTON MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF I OUT OF SCHOOL SANCTIONS LONG TERM- I I EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT UM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF UHT TOT BLK WHT TOT Ind Exp INSUBORO Dis Cond Ass Staf CLASS K 2 2 2 3 100 105 110 071 1 1 1 1 1 1 SUBTOTAL 2 2 2 3 2 3 1 1 1 2 5 1 1 1 2 5 Battery Mischief Dis Cond Ass Staf V As Sf UEAPONS1 CLASS 01 2 2 2 3 3 3 020 080 110 071 072 091 3 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 SUBTOTAL 4 4 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 8 1 2 5 1 1 1 1 1 10 Assault Battery Ind Exp Dis Cond RAPRINGS Ass Staf CLASS 02 2 2 2 2 2 3 010 020 100 110 130 071 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 SUBTOTAL 1 2 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 7 Assault Battery CLASS 03 2 2 010 020 1 1 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 3 2 1 3 Ref Ruis Assault Battery Ind Exp Gang Mem CLASS 04 1 2 2 2 3 062 010 020 100 123 1 3 1 3 1 1 2 SUBTOTAL 1 5 1 5 1 1 1 3 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 7 1 1 1 3 2 1 1 8 Battery Dis Cond Ass Staf Pos Ueap CLASS 05 2 2 3 3 020 110 071 090 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 3 2 3 1 1 1 1 3 5 1 1 1 1 1 3 6 Assault Battery Fighting Ind Exp Dis Cond Paging D 2 2 2 2 2 2 010 020 040 100 110 123 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 3LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 57 SCHOOL: 042 WASHINGTON MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF I SANCTIONS OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM I EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT UM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT Ass Staf V As Sf Pos Weap WEAPONSI Gang Mem Other of CLASS 06 3 3 3 3 3 4 071 072 090 091 123 000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SUBTOTAL 6 4 10 3 1 3 1 6 1 1 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 16 21 1 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 17 27 4 4 16 5 21 4 4 48 8 56LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE bl FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE SCHOOL: 052 WATSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 I SANCTIONS I I OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF OUT OF SCHOOL LONG TERM EXPELLED TOTAL BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT Battery Fighting Ind Exp CLASS 01 2 2 2 020 040 100 SUBTOTAL 1 2 1 4 1 1 1 2 2 5 1 2 2 5 1 2 2 5 FAILOBEY Theft Fighting INSUBORD Dis Cond AL-DRUGS CLASS 02 1 2 2 2 2 2 060 030 040 105 110 150 1 2 1 3 1 SUBTOTAL 7 3 1 5 1 1 2 1 6 1 12 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 b 1 12 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 7 1 14 INSUBORO Dis Cond WEAPONSI CLASS 03 2 2 3 105 110 091 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 It Fighting INSUBORD CLASS 04 2 2 040 105 SUBTOTAL 4 1 5 4 1 5 4 1 5 4 1 5 Fighting Ind Exp Dis Cond AL-DRUGS CLASS 05 2 2 040 100 110 150 1 1 1 SUBTOTAL 2 1 I, 2 1 4 1 1 1 1 2 1 4 1 1 1 1 2 1 5 Fighting INSUBORD Forgery Paging D AL-DRUGS CLASS 06 2 2 2 2 2 040 105 122 123 150 SUBTOTAL 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 7 2 1 2 1 1 7 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 30 6 36 3 1 4 36 4 40SCHOOL: 029 WESTERN HILLS ELEMENTARY I OUT OF SCHOOL LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: SANCTIONS I SUSMRC 6/04/97 LONG TERM EXPELLED OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM 07/03/97 WF WHT TOT BLK PAGE I TOTAL WHT 43 TOT FAILOBEY INSUBORD CLASS K 1 2 060 105 SUBTOTAL 2 1 3 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 3 1 4 INSUBORD CLASS 01 2 105 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 FAILOBEY INSUBORD CLASS 02 1 2 060 105 SUBTOTAL 1 3 4 1 3 4 1 3 4 1 3 4 MinAlter Theft Fighting INSUBORD CLASS 03 1 2 2 2 030 030 040 105 SUBTOTAL 1 1 2 5 9 1 1 2 5 9 1 1 2 5 9 1 1 2 5 9 FAILOBEY Ref Ruis Fighting PROSTAFF INSUBORD Dis Cond CLASS 04 1 1 2 2 2 2 060 062 040 090 105 110 SUBTOTAL 2 3 1 1 5 1 13 1 1 1 3 2 3 2 1 6 2 16 1 1 1 1 2 3 2 1 6 2 16 1 1 2 3 2 1 7 2 17 INSUBORD CLASS 05 2 105 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 Ref Ruis Foul Lan INSUBORD Dis Cond CLASS 06 1 1 2 2 062 110 105 110 SUBTOTAL 2 1 13 1 17 1 1 2 1 14 1 18 2 1 14 1 18 2 1 14 1 18 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 48 4 52 3 3 52 3 55LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SUSMRC 07/03/97 PAGE 58 SCHOOL: 043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: 6/04/97 OFFENCE Pos Ueap CLASS K I LVL CODE BM BF OUT OF SCHOOL BLK TOT UM UF WHT TOT BM SANCTIONS I I BF LONG TERM' EXPELLED TOTAL 3 090 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 1 1 BLK TOT UM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT 1 1 1 TOT 1 1 1SCHOOL: 044 WILSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT WM WF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE SY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: SANCTIONS LONG TERM SUSMRC 6/04/97 I EXPELLED 07/03/97 PAGE TOTAL 59 I WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT WM WF WHT TOT BLK WHT TOT Battery CLASS 03 2 020 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 WEAPONSI CLASS 04 3 091 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PROSTAFF CLASS 05 2 090 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 FAILOBEY CLASS 06 1 060 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 PROSTAFF CLASS 09 2 090 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 3 2 5 5 5SCHOOL: 045 WOODRUFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I OUT OF SCHOOL OFFENCE LVL CODE BM BF BLK TOT UM WF LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM DATE: DISCIPLINE BY REASON CODE 8/19/96 TO DATE: SANCTIONS LONG TERM SUSMRC 6/04/97 I EXPELLED 07/03/97 PAGE TOTAL 60 I WHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM UF UHT TOT BM BF BLK TOT UM WF Ind Exp CLASS K 2 100 WHT TOT BLK UHT TOT SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 Assault PROSTAFF Ind Exp 2 2 2 010 090 100 2 2 CLASS 02 SUBTOTAL 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 4 6 1 1 1 1 Assault Theft Fighting INSUBORD 2 2 2 2 010 030 040 105 CLASS 03 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 2 2 2 2 Assault Ind Exp INSUBORD 2 2 2 010 100 105 4 4 CLASS 04 SUBTOTAL 1 5 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Fighting Ass Staf 2 3 040 071 1 CLASS 05 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 2 Assault INSUBORD 2 2 010 105 CLASS 06 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Assault 2 010 CLASS 07 SUBTOTAL 1 1 1 1 SCHOOL SUBTOTAL 13 2 15 1 1 8 3 11 3 1 I, 8 3 1 4 8 3 1 1 1 6 I, 1 2 7 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 26 1 3 1 1 1 6 4 1 2 7 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 27Discipline Sanctions by Reason Code Year: 96 Qaartcr: Ist \u0026amp; 2nd OI-Feb-96 Level School LvI Code OfTeiue BM WM OM BF WF OF Total ScaiarHlBh CENTRAL RECEIVF^ MAR 4 1996 Office of Desegregation Monitoring 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 030 062 Oto 090 100 131 132 010 030 040 OtO 090 IOS no 123 150 071 072 091 121 123 Minor Altercation Refuted to obey Rulc/Dncd Failure to Serve DetentJoa Refitted to Serve Detention Smoking Fust Offcnae Ute/Pocs Alcoh Ute/Pocs. Drugs (1st) Aaaault Theft Fighting Malicious Mischief / Vaodali Non-threaten. Profaoity/Staff Refusing to Follow Directives Disorderly Conduct Use of Paging Devices Poss, or Use Alcohol/Drags Physical Assault of Staff Verbal Assault on Staff Possession Weapon/Kaifc Use of Weapon Membership ia Prohibited Ga 1 2 9 3 1 I 1 1 0 II 0 6 II 29 5 6 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 2 0 0 0 1 1 12 0 1 7 t 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 1 I 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 17 6 4 1 1 2 1 23 1 7 22 39 9 10 1 1 3 1 1 1S5 Scalar High FAIR 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 030 050 060 062 070 OtO 090 100 110 132 020 030 040 070 090 100 IOS IIO 122 123 ISO 072 , 090 091 120 000 Mraor Aitercatioo Left Schml w/o Prmtissina Fsiluie to Follow Rui. or Dh. Rehased to obey Raic/Dhccti Rctoad to obey Bas Rtaha* FsBate to Serve DitsaKea Retocd to Serve Detealioa Smoking Ushig Fool or Abusive Lags Use/Poss. Drags (1st) Battery Theft FigMing Loitering / Crimhud Tresapm Non-threaten. Prohnity/Staff Indecent Exposure Refitting to Follow Dbcctivcx Dijorderty Onduct Forgery/Failure to Provide ID Use of Paging Devicex Poss, or Use Alcohol/Drags Verbal Assault on Staff Possession of Weapon Possession Weapon/Knife Inciting to Riot Offense not Mentioned 2 2 3 27 0 1 6 1 6 0 5 1 II 3 12 1 It 4 1 5 1 2 1 1 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 1 2 0 2 0 I 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 5 1 0 1 0 6 0 0 1 6 2 t 0 3 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 3 5 35 1 4 I 3 12 2 5 3 It 5 21 1 21 t 1 t 1 2 1 1 3 1 178 Scaior llifk HALL I I OSO 060 Left School w/o Pennission Failure Io Follow Rui. or Dir. I 17 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 21 LRSD laformation Services zLevel, School LvI Code Offeue BM WM OM IF WF OF Total StutarHIgh HALL 1 1 I I 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 062 010 100 110 010 020 030 040 0(0 090 no 121 123 130 ISO 072 090 Rcftaed to obey Rula/DtrectI Failure Io Serve Detention Smoking Using Foul or Abusive Langu Assault Battery Theft Fighting Malicious Mischief / Vandali Non-threaten. Profanity/Slaff Disorderty Coodact Repeated Violatiort-Sotoking Ute of Paging Devices Poss, of Rap Rings/Fac. Wea Poss, or Ute Alcohol/Drugt Verbal Astault on Staff Possession of Weapon 10 3 0 0 1 1 3 t 3 6 2 0 3 0 5 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 I 1 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 4 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 5 1 3 1 2 3 10 6 14 4 1 ( 2 7 2 1 104 Stator High MCCLELLA 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 OSO 060 062 070 0(0 090 100 110 010 020 030 040 OSO 010 090 IOS no 122 123 130 ISO 090 091 120 121 Left School w/o Petmiataoa Failure to Follow Rui. or Dir. Refiaed to obey Rule/Directi Refused to obey Bus Ralcadk Failure to Serve Deteatioa Refiaed to Serve Deteatioa Snaking Utittg Foul or Abusive Langu Astault Battery Theft Fighting GamUiog Maiieioai Mischief / VanM Noa tkntoiii, Refusing to Follow Dhuettoet Diaordatty Conduct Fotgety/Faaarc to Ptovids ID Use of Paging Devices Post, of Rap Rings/Fac. Wea Poss, or Use Alcohol/Drags Potsettwn of Weapon Possession Weapon/Knife Iraiting to Riot Use of Weapon 7 24 7 2 2 2 1 2 1 3 1 10 4 0 11 14 15 1 3 2 5 1 2 5 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 9 3 0 1 0 0 0 2 I 0 4 0 I 2 5 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 I 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 3( 10 2 3 2 2 2 3 5 1 15 4 2 15 20 17 3 4 2 1 1 2 6 1 177 ScatorHigk METRO 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 030 OSO HO 060 IOS 110 ISO Minor Altercation Left School w/o Permission Using Foul or Abusive Langu False Alarm Refusing to Follow Directives Disorderly Conduct Poss, or Ure Alcohol/Drugs 1 1 1 I 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 2 3 1 12 Srator Higk PARKVIEW 1 1 I 030 OSO 062 Minor AllercMion Left School w/o Ptrmiuion Refused to obey Rule/Directi I 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 2 LRSD Information Servicca 2. Level. School LvI Coda OffCOM BM WM OM BF WF OF Total Sniw Hlfh FAWCVIEW 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 0(0 090 100 110 131 010 030 040 090 105 110 123 150 0(1 Failufc to Srvt Detention Refuted to Steve Detention Sotoklng Uling Foul oe Abusive Ltngu First Offemc Uie/Pott Akoh Assault Theft Fi(htin( Non-thieaten. Profanity/Stafr Refusing to Follow Directives Disorderly Conduct Use of Paging Devices Pou. or Use Alcohol/Dnigt Posscuioa of FirewnvTistol 2 0 0 2 0 1 4 1 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 2 0 1 0 I 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 2 1 3 5 6 1 2 1 2 2 1 38 JniM-Hieii ALTLRN 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 040 060 090 100 110 010 020 030 040 0(0 090 no 123 072 121 Harrassment Failure to Follow Rui. or Dir. Refiaed to Serve Detention Smoking Using Foul or Abusive Langa Assault Battery Theft FightiBg Malictoas bfisdutf / Vsndati Non-threasea. Protehy/Staff Disordeeiy Conduct Ute of Paging Devices Verbal Asaauh on Staff UseofWe^wn 2 1 1 0 3 0 6 2 ( 2 5 5 1 I 0 0 1 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 I 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 jMtorHIgk CLOVKJ* I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 030 060 0(2 070 0(0 100 110 140 010 020 030 040 0(0 090 100 105 110 121 122 123 150 060 Mlnoe Ahserulun FaUare to Follow Rai. or Dlr. Reftaad to obey Ralt/Diracti Rcftiacd to obey Baa Radaa* Failure to Serve Detentioa Smoking Using Foul or Abuarvt Langa Fais, of Info/Records (Bleat) Assault Battery Theft FightiBg Msliciout Mischief! Vsndali Non-thresten. Profanity/Staff Irtdeccnt Exposure Refusing to Follow Directives Disorderly Condua Repealed Violalion-Smoking Forgery/Failuie to Provide ID Use of Paging Devices Pou. or Use Alcohot/Diugs Arson ( 10 15 0 0 1 1 0 3 7 1 12 3 1 1 22 20 2 1 1 1 I 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 r 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 I 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LRSD InfonaatloB Scrvlcci Seaior High M4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 5 3 2 6 2 10 3 7 2 1 1 1 54 3 ( 6 0 I 0 1 1 0 5 0 7 0 1 0 16 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 I( 24 I 1 1 2 2 3 13 2 21 3 2 1 47 34 2 I 2 1 1 JUv! 9CMVI Lvt Cod* OITmu* BM WM OM Br wr OF Total JaatM'HIgk CLOvuni 3 3 3 07J 090 091 Verbal Auaull on SUIT Poeeeulon of Weepon Foucstlon WeepoiVKnife 2 2 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 1 200 JaaiwRIth DUNBAR 1 I 1 I 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 030 OM 062 133 010 020 030 040 OSO OSO 090 100 IOS no 122 123 130 ISO 040 072 110 123 Minor Altercation Faihae to Follow Rol. or Dir. RcAited to obey Rule/Difccti Repeated SchooUClau Twdie Assault Battery Theft Fifhtinf Gambling Malicious Mischief / Vsadali Non-tfarealen. Frofanty/Staff Indecent Exposure Refusing to Follow DirectiTCS Disorderly Conduct Forgery/FsiliBe to Provide ID Use of Paging Devices Poas. of Rap Rings/Fac. Wea Poes, or Use Akobol/Dngs Second ofiense. Drop Verbal Astantl on Staff Extortion, Blackmail, Coescie Membership ia ProhMed Ga 4 2 1 4 5 3 I 20 1 5 1 1 40 5 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 5 1 1 0 0 I 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 7 0 0 7 Q 13 3 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 3 6 6 5 2 33 2 6 9 1 64 10 2 3 1 1 1 2 1 4 171 JntorHi(k FORST KT 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 030 OSO OM 062 090 100 no 131 133 010 020 030 040 OSO 090 100 IOS 110 123 130 140 , ISO 071 072 090 120 123 Mmor Altercatioa Left School w/o Penniasioo Fatiatc to Frditrw RaL or Oh. Refined to obey Ralc/Dhaeti Refitaad to Serve Dcteatiaa Smoking Using Fool or Abnsivc Langa Fast OChtme Use/Foss Alooh Repeated SchodAnaat Tradie Assault Battery Theft Fighting Gambling Non Ihrraten. Pioteity/Slaff Indecem Exposure Refusing to Follow Directives Disorderty Conduct Use of Paging Devices Pots, of Rep Rings/Fac. Wea Possession of Fireworks Poss, or Use Alcohol/Drugs Physical Assault of Staff Verbal Assault on Staff Possession of Weapon Inciting to Riol Membership in Prohibited Oa 13 2 S 7 1 1 0 1 2 4 10 1 9 2 23 5 19 I 3 1 1 6 1 4 1 0 3 1 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 I 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 t 0 11 0 3 1 2 0 0 0 0 4 1 2 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II 3 6 13 2 2 1 1 2 5 11 1 It 2 3S 5 24 9 6 1 1 6 I s 2 2 6 191 LRSD Information Scrvicci 4. Lovol SdMoi LvI Co4 OffoOM BM WM OM r wr or Total HENDEXSN 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 030 040 050 060 062 010 100 no 133 140 010 020 040 050 0(0 090 100 no 120 122 123 130 140 150 071 072 090 091 122 123 Minor AltercMlon Hanasunem Left School w/o Penniiaion Failure to Follow Rui. or Dlr. Reftued to obey Rule/Dtrectl Failure to Serve Deteatioa Smokinj Ujinf Foul or Abusive Langa Repeated School/Claaa Tardie Fais, of Inio/Records (Eiean) Assault Battery nghting GamMing Maliciout Mischief / Vandal Non-threalea. Pmlauty/Stttt Indecent Exposure Disorderly Conduct Haraasing Corrnnunicaaioat Forgery/Failure to Provide ID Use of Paging Devices Poea. of Rap Ringa/Fac. Wen Posaessioa of Fitewotk* Poss, or Use Alcohol/Dragt Pbysicai Assault of Stiff Verbal Assault on Staff Possession of Weapon Pnasf alien WeapoiVKailt Uniawfttl Assetnbly Membership tn ProhibitBdQa 16 2 4 9 30 2 1 6 0 0 3 4 3 2 I 4 3 14 2 1 0 0 1 4 1 2 1 0 I 7 5 0 4 2 9 0 3 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 4 0 1 0 0 0 1 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 1 II 16 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 7 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 2 9 30 53 2 6 10 2 1 3 3 5 4 1 g 5 25 2 2 1 2 1 6 2 2 2 1 1 7 243 JooterHch MABELA 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 3 3 4 030 040 060 062 too no 131 132 133 010 020 030 040 050 090 105 no 123 150 072 121 000 Minor Atercatiaa Hamssnent Faihae to Follow Rai. or Dir. Retbsed to obey RniaAJhacii Sauking Using Foul or Abostve Lan^ Fast OOmse Use/Poas Aleoh Use/Poss. Drugs (1st) Repeatod School/Cltos Tardk Assault Battery Theft Fighting Gambling Non-threaten. Profanity/Staff Refusing to Follow Directives Disorderly Conduct Use of Paging Devices Poss, or Use Alcohol/Drugs Verbal Assault on Staff Use of Weapon Offense not Mentioned 31 0 5 29 3 7 1 0 1 1 1 0 4 0 1 2 13 2 2 2 1 I 5 1 1 4 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 2 0 1 1 14 1 2 I 0 0 1 0 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 1 I 40 3 9 1 1 I 1 5 2 9 1 3 3 30 3 4 3 1 1 179 Jiatar HIth MANNNVS I I 030 030 Minor Altercation Left School w/o Pcrtniulon 1 1 3 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 LRSD laformation Service* 5Leycl SckMl LvI Cede OffMM BM WM OM BF WF OF Total JaatorWok MANN M/S 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 3 3 062 010 090 010 030 040 0*0 090 100 IOS no 123 ISO 010 0*1 Rcftaed to obey Rulc/Dbacii Failure to Serve Detentioe Rcftaed u\u0026gt; Serve Detentloa Astault Theft Ftfhtinf Malickxa Mbdiief / VaidaJi Non-threateo. Proftoity/Stiff Indecent Exposure Refiaini to Follow Directive* Ditordetiy Conduct Ute of Paging Devioet Pots, or Um Alcohol/Dmgt Sale/Distribulioa of Alcohol Pottestion ofFirearm/Pittol 3 I 0 I I 10 0 4 1 15 3 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 * 2 2 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 3 I 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 I I 3 3 21 3 6 1 25 4 1 6 1 1 u Mar Ooh PULHTJ 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 030 040 OM 062 090 010 020 030 040 090 IOS no 122 123 ISO 072 Minor Altercation Hamtsment Failure to Follow Rui. or Dir. Refiaed to obey Rule/Diracti Rcftaed to Serve Detcaliaa Astaall Battery Theft Fighting Noo-tbreaten. Reftaiag to Follow Directisat Diaotdetty Coaduct Fofgery/Failnre to Provide ID Um of Pagiog Devicct Pot*, or Um Aloohoi/Dittgi VcMAaaaailaa Staff 10 1 2 6 0 2 1 1 9 3 21 13 I 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 4 6 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 I 2 7 1 2 2 4 14 7 27 17 1 4 3 2 IM JaatarHok SOUTHWST 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 030 OSO OM 062 010 090 too 110 010 020 040 070 0*0 090 IOS 110 120 123 130 ISO 090 091 MiaarAiaetcalioa Left School w/o Pettaiaiiaa Failure to Follow Rui. or Dir. Reftaed Io obey Rnle/Diracii Failwe to Serve Deteatioa Refiaed Io Serve Deteatioa Smoking Using Foul or Abusive Langu Ataauk Banery Fighting Loitering / Criminal Ticstpat Malicious Mischief / Vandali Non-threaten. Profiuiity/Staff Refining to Follow Directives Disorderly Conduct Harassing Communications Use of Paging Devices Poss, of Rap Rings/Fac. Wea Pott, or Um Alcohol/Drugt Postetiion of Weapon Poiscstion Weapon/Knife s 6, 3 12 6 2 0 3 1 0 22 1 1 7 13 35 I 2 2 1 0 0 1 3 1 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 4 3 4 2 0 0 1 0 1 17 0 2 4 9 * 0 0 0 1 I I 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 13 10 20 * 2 2 4 1 1 43 1 3 II 21 49 1 3 2 2 I I LRSD laformation Service* dLevel SciMMi LvI Coda O(Tcm BM WM OM r WK or Total 215 etcaottry BALE 1 1 2 2 2 2 060 062 040 on 100 120 Failure to Follow Rui. or Dir. Refiaed to obey Rule/DirsGti Fighting Malicious Mischief/ Vandali Indecent Exposure Harassing Conunuaicatioos 3 0 4 I 1 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dtaertary BASELINE 1 I 2 3 3 3 060 062 010 071 072 090 Failure to Follow Rai. or Dir. Refused to obey Raic/Difecii Assault Physical Assault of Staff Veriwl Assault 00 Staff Posscssloo of Weapon 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Elftoary BOOKER 1 1 I 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 030 040 062 070 IIO 010 040 090 IOS 091 Minor Altorcatioo Hanes intent Refiaed to obey Ruie/Diieeti Refiaed to obey Bus Rules* Using Foal or Abusive Langa Assault FightiBg Non-theeaten. Pmfaaity/Staff Refiaing to Follow Directives Possession Weapon/Knife 1 0 1 0 2 S 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Kliafary BKADY I 2 062 040 Refaacd to ofcay RaiaAiitacti Figtatiaf I 3 0 0 0 0 Dcacalwy CARVER 1 2 060 IOS Faihac to Follow Rai. or Dir. RcBaiai to Follow Dwaetivat 3 2 0 0 0 0 Ekanlary CHICOT 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 030 062 010 030 040 0(0 090 IOS 110 123 071 072 Minor Altercation Refuted to obey Rule/Directi Assault Theft Fighting Malicious Mischief / Vndali Non-threaien. Profanity/Staff Refusing to Follow Directives Disorderly Conduct Use of Paging Devices Physical Assault of Staff Verbal Assault on Staff 7 5 3 3 1 2 1 0 3 2 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ekataary DODD 1 2 060 010 Failure to Follow Rui. or Dir. Assault 1 2 0 0 0 0 LRSD Information Services Jailor Higk 1447 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 4 1 1 1 12 1 2 1 I 1 1 7 1 1 1 1 2 7 1 3 1 1 ir 1 3 4 3 2 5 7 J 4 3 5 2 1 1 5 2 3 I 39 1 2 7Lev*} Sckool LvI C4 OffoOM BM WM OM BF WF OF Total 3 Ekamii7 FAIRPRK 1 2 2 2 2 062 010 040 IOS no Refiiasd to obey Rulc^Jimcti Assault Fighting Reftaing to Follow Dnetives Disorderty Conduct 2 I 1 0 2 0 I 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 I 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 I 1 3 11 EkaMotary FORSTPK 1 1 1 1 2 030 060 062 110 040 Minor Altercatioa Failare to Follow Rui. or Dir. Refused to obey Rule/Diiecti Using Foul or Abusive Lsngu Fightiag 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 I 2 9 EkBatory FRANKLIN 2 2 2 3 030 no 123 071 Theft Disordetly Conduct Um of Paging Devica Physical Assault of Staff 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 1 6 Ekacatary FULBRIGH 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 030 060 030 090 IOS no 123 091 Minor Altercation Failace to Follow Rui. or Dir. Theft Non-threalca. Profitoity/Staff Rettasiag to Follow Dirsetivea Diaocderly Conduct Um of Paging Devices Possession Weapon/Karte 0 1 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 I 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 I I 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 3 1 2 3 I 1 15 Ekacatary GARLAND 1 2 2 2 062 IOS 130 140 Reflaed to obey RakZDiMcti Retetag to Follow Dkeclivcs Poo. of Rag Riaga/Fac. Wea Poaeeasioa of Fvewnks 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 I 1 1 EkaMatary GEYER SF 1 2 2 2 3 060 010 no 130 072 FaUwe to Follow Rid. or Dir. Assault Disorderty Conduct Pou. of Rap Riagi/Fac. Wea Vcrtal Assault on Staff 2 0 0 0 I 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 I 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 1 1 1 9 Ekaeatary GIBBS 1 1 2 030 062 no Minor Altercation Refilled to obey Riile/Diiecti Diiorderly Conduct 2 2 I 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 6 Ekaratary JEFFRSN 1 062 Refilled to obey Rulc/Directi 1 0 0 0 0 0 t 1 Ekaaaary ML KING 1 I 2 060 062 040 Failtae to Follow Rui. or Dir. Refilled to obey Rulc/Direcii Fithlin( 0 1 I I 2 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 4 I LRSD Information Services 8Level School LvI Code OfTeoM BM WM OM BF WF OF Total EkmtBlary MLKINO 2 090 Noo-Ovulen. Proflmity/Stiff 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 Ek IM ate 17 MABEL EL 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 030 060 062 010 040 090 110 Minor Altercation Failure to Follow Rui. or Dk. Refused to obey Ruk/Dirocti Assault Fighting Non-threaten. Profanity/Slaff Disorderly Conduct 1 0 1 4 1 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 I 3 1 6 24 Ekacatary MCDERMOT 2 2 040 IOS Fighting Refusing to Follow Dircctivet 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 3 Ekacalary MEADCLIF 1 1 2 2 2 2 060 062 040 090 IOS no Failure to Follow Rui. or Dir. Reftised to obey Rule/Directi Fighting Non-threalen. Proknity/Staff Refusing to Follow Directives Disorderfy Conduct 2 1 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 1 3 2 11 Ekaeatary MITCHELL 2 2 2 2 010 030 105 no Assault Theft Refusing to Follow Directives Disoederfy Conduct 1 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 1 13 Ektaatary OTTER CR t IIO Disonktly Coaduct I 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Ekacatary PUL ETTE 1 I I 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 040 060 062 010 040 100 10s no 120 091 Hareaasment Failure to Foltow Rui. at Dir. Reftaed to obey Rule/Directi Assault Fighting Indecent Exposure Refusing to Follow Directives Disorderly CoiKiuct Harassing Comnunicatioos Possession Weapoa/Knifie 1 1 3 0 2 2 1 14 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 4 1 6 2 I 17 2 1 38 EkacaUry RIGHTSEL 1 1 3 060 040 071 Failure Io Follow Rui. or Dir. Fightint Physical Assault of Staff 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 4 Ekaeatary ROCKFELR 1 1 1 2 2 1 040 062 IIO 040 010 IOS Harrassment Refused to obey Rule/Directi Using Foul or Abusive Langu Fighting Malicious Mischief! Vandali Refusing to Follow Directives 1 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 I I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 3 1 LRSD Information Services 9Level School LvI Code OrrcDM BM WM OM BF WF OF Total 9 Elemeatiry ROMINE I 060 Failure to Follow Rui. or Dir. I 0 0 0 0 0 1 I Elcacatiry TERRY 1 1 2 2 030 062 090 IIO Minor Altercation Refined to obey Rule/Directi Non-threaten. Profanity/Staff Disorderly Conduct 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 2 1 8 Elemeatary WASHNGTN 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 062 010 020 100 110 060 071 091 Refused to obey Rule/Directi Assault Battery Indecent Exposure Disorderly Conduct Arson Physical Assault of Staff Possession Weapon/Knife 1 5 I 1 1 1 I 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 16 Elemeatary WATSON 1 1 I 2 2 2 2 030 060 062 010 030 040 105 Minor Altercation Failure to Follow Rui. or Dir. Refiaed to obey Rule/Directi Assault Theft Fighting Refining to Follow Directives 2 0 1 3 0 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 1 1 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 I 5 1 15 1 27 ElemeaUry WESTHIL 1 2 2 2 3 062 090 IOS IIO 091 Refused to obey Rule/Directi Noo-threalen. Profanity/Staff Refining to Follow Directives Disorderly Conduct Possession Weapon/Knife 0 0 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 1 7 Elemeatary WILSON 2 2 2 3 020 040 IOS 091 Battery Fighting Refiaing to Follow Directives Possession Weapon/Knife I 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 6 Elemeatary WOODRUFF 2 2 3 010 110 071 Assault Disorderly Conduct Physical Assault of Staff 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1  0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 LRSD Information Services Elementary Grand Total: 330 2441 10FROM : Panasonic Fh/^ SYSTEM PHONE NO. Jul. Ji 1995 08:i4HM Pl DISCIPLINF. MANA(\nEMEN'r QUARTERLY REPORT School. ALiLmEJ-L Beginning ieriod Principal_C\u0026gt; /FV_ Ending Period OCT. , mG Per.iq PART I. Please indicate number of suspensions by race and category. A. Out of School Suspensions - Category I Violations Grades ..f_ 1\ni Txtib per cnhtnin BI.ek 3- iO X 2. T 33 T.MbI Black While Total White--------- Spanish Total Span Aaia/Pad Total Asia/ Pac (nd/Esk 199 i lI t\u0026gt;( 1 essyey\nilOII Total (nd/ F.sk '.to 111 iiinj/ Olher Tal Olher . Toiaii ig F M F M F M F M F M F 1 5 33 iffles- A r'H f B. Long-Term Suspension - Category H Violations Grades Qiaek loutl Black White Tola! White Spanish Total Span Afiia/Pac Total Asia/ Pac ind/Eak Total Ind/ Esk Other Txbtnl Olher Totals M F M F F M F M F M F K i: _3_- Ji- 5 (ry . Totals per column I I 2 C. Expulsions - Category UI Violations j i Grades Black St Total Black V.'hiie Total While Spanish Total Span Asia/Pac Total Asia/ Pac hid/Esk Total Ind/ Esk Olher Total OtljCf Totals F M F M F M F M F M F L Totals per coluRtn NOTE: Quarterly Reports are due in the Hearing Office one (1) week following the end ot each Grading Period. SEE REVERSE FOR PARTS 11, III AND IV.FROM : Panasonic FAX SYSTEM PHOFE MO. : Jul. 11 1995 08:15AM P2 **Sen| P.MtT 11. Please complete. *NOTR: These figures are to be included in Part I. \"NOTE: Students on Sent Homes are not included in Part I. Clil Total Black Total While Spanish r- Tslal SpOH Ti'tnl Asia/ Pac Ind/E^k Total Ind/ E.\u0026lt;k Other Tvi.il .Hhcr  * 1 inte rj sik'v FeiKova/i Hixnebtiund tn.stnjLiiofl SancUvn* Special Ldiuautin PART III. Personal Data - Please indicate race, sex and experience of staff members recommending the various suspensions.  TcaChirtS F..*l'cricnc Black Total Black WhiW Total While Spanish Total Span Asia/Pac Total Asia/ Ppe Ind/Esk Total Ind/ Eak Olhcf ToiaI Other Tislalii 0-3 10 11-15 16-20 212.5 Hl 26-30 JCi-Over Toials 16 PART IV. Enroliment Data - Please indicate your schools enrollment by Grade Level, Sex and Race. I n'gr.: ! Grada Black Total Black . Wn|{ Total Vhitc Spani.th Total Span Asia/Pac lE i'T Total Ania/ Pae ind/Gxk Total Ind/ Rsk Olhsr Tiital [ Other Totals Per Grade jjj. zz_ 1^ Tfi. 46 M- Jil. IT Si .IL. n T.'t.ti M M F M F M F M F M h( 5 3B F M F M F M F M F M r F n M 4 B F M F M F F F ievatOit Jrt.a V YAYLOR'-ntsCMOMT CBB\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eLittle Rock School District\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"loc_rosaparks_48228","title":"[Elaine Eason Steele, half-length portrait, seated next to poinsettia plant] [graphic] /","collection_id":"loc_rosaparks","collection_title":"Rosa Parks Papers","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5"],"dcterms_creator":["Morgan, Monica, photographer."],"dc_date":["1996"],"dcterms_description":["Title devised by Library staff.","Photographer credit: \" \u0026copy; Monica Morgan photography. Photo credit mandatory\"--on back of print."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":null,"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":null,"dcterms_title":["[Elaine Eason Steele, half-length portrait, seated next to poinsettia plant] [graphic] /"],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Library of Congress"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.48228"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Please contact holding institution for information regarding use and copyright status."],"dcterms_medium":["photographic printscolor1990-2000.gmgpc","portrait photographs1990-2000.gmgpc"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Steele, Elaine Eason"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"loc_rosaparks_48229","title":"[Elaine Eason Steele, head-and-shoulders portrait, facing left] [graphic] /","collection_id":"loc_rosaparks","collection_title":"Rosa Parks Papers","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5"],"dcterms_creator":["Morgan, Monica, photographer."],"dc_date":["1996"],"dcterms_description":["Title devised by Library staff.","Photographer credit: \" \u0026copy; Monica Morgan photography. Photo credit mandatory\"--on back of print."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":null,"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":null,"dcterms_title":["[Elaine Eason Steele, head-and-shoulders portrait, facing left] [graphic] /"],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Library of Congress"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.48229"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Please contact holding institution for information regarding use and copyright status."],"dcterms_medium":["photographic printscolor1990-2000.gmgpc","portrait photographs1990-2000.gmgpc"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Steele, Elaine Eason"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"tmll_hpcrc_38130820","title":"The enforcement of affirmative action compliance in Indiana under Executive Order 11246","collection_id":"tmll_hpcrc","collection_title":"Historical Publications of the United States Commission on Civil Rights","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Indiana, 40.00032, -86.25027"],"dcterms_creator":["United States Commission on Civil Rights. Indiana Advisory Committee","United States Commission on Civil Rights. Midwestern Regional Office"],"dc_date":["1996"],"dcterms_description":["A digital version of the report published by the United States Commission on Civil Rights.","The Civil Rights Digital Library received support from a National Leadership Grant for Libraries awarded to the University of Georgia by the Institute of Museum and Library Services for the aggregation and enhancement of partner metadata."],"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":["Forms part of online collection: Historical Publications of the United States Commission on Civil Rights."],"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["Affirmative action programs--Law and legislation--Indiana","Discrimination in employment--Law and legislation--Indiana","Construction industry--Law and legislation--Indiana","Public contracts--Indiana"],"dcterms_title":["The enforcement of affirmative action compliance in Indiana under Executive Order 11246"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Thurgood Marshall Law Library"],"edm_is_shown_by":["http://www2.law.umaryland.edu/marshall/usccr/documents/cr12af23z.pdf"],"edm_is_shown_at":["http://crdl.usg.edu/id:tmll_hpcrc_38130820"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports","records"],"dcterms_extent":["75 p. ; 28 cm."],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_442","title":"Fact Finding Committee","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1996/1998"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Educational planning","Education--Evaluation","School integration"],"dcterms_title":["Fact Finding Committee"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/442"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nSUNDA'Y^JANUARY^21,1996------- Walker sees lack of commitment Fact-Finding Committee hears his views on school bosses, patrons BY CARRIE RENGERS Democral-Gazelte Staff Writer One of the key figures in the Pulaski County school desegregation case didn't attend a discussion of school issues that was held Saturday by neighborhood associations, but he was the featured speaker at another school-related meeting. .John Walker, the attorney who represents a group of black families in the case, spoke to a new committee called The Fact-Finding Committee for the Little Rock School District Desegregation Plan  Ls It Working for African-American Youth? We're fighting for our children. said Hafeeza Majeed, the community activist who organized the first of what she said will be rf X-. several meetings to develop modifications to the desegregation plan. , I meeting was exclusively for une oiscrict teacher who was black citizens. Approximately 35 present agreed and said that when people came and only black-owned she goes to schools other than her news media organizations were in- Arkansas Democrat-Gazette/KAREN VANDONGE R(Kk attorney John Walker speaks Saturday to black residents about the Pulaski County desegregation case. One district teacher who present agreed and said that when vited. Majeed explained that was so participants would feel at ease dis- own, she's treated poorly until administration officials learn shes a ------------ teacher. Little Rock School Board cussing issues without the fear of Member Michael Daugherty said he bPina ------------- experienced similar problems. being misinterpreted. However, a a plan should be scrapped only after its been proven not to work. That has not happened, Walker said. And Walker had a brief comment on the strategic plan that was one of the main focuses of the reporter and photographer for the Arkwisas Democrat-Gazette were invited to stay when they aiTived. neighborhood association meeting Walker had familiar harsh words for the school district, but he also bemoaned black attitudes. People only do right when earlier in the day. theres a vigil, Daugherty said.  ...... \" And I am watching. The Little Rock School District's proposed plan for 199e-2001 con- Walker defended the desegregation plan and criticized district officials for not understanding it. I t 1  71.' --------- They dont like the plan, not un- ' P''  *. P'an IS Walker said. There is nothing in the desegregation plan that desegregation plan that is not ..................... tains strategies for achieving various goals and includes either im By and large, we accept second- said. We have an environment that plementing or modifying the desegregation plan. But Walker said, The strategic plan is not part of subjects our kids to dual standards  more than dual standards. Its just a repressive environment. 1\u0026gt; good education. The problem. Walker said, is there is no commitment. He said He said the desegregation plan is important because our chil- dren must learn in integrated environments. FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 8. 1996 .3B ' Black parents committee offers school suggestions BY CYNTHIA HOWELL Democrat-Gazette Education Writer The Little Rock School District could better meet black students needs by altering the districts cur- students and district officials about the district. The committee felt there was a need for an independent renew of the districts desegregation plan and riculum and disciplinary system its affect on African-American stu- and improving communications dents, Majeed said. But no one with parents, a committee of black had to tell us that the desired results parents said Thursday. of the plan have not been achieved.\"  She said the board and superintendent should take steps to ensure The committee, represented by community activist Hafeeza Majeed, recommended revising the that district residents and staff un- .....derstand the districts desegrega- districts curriculum to include more about Africa and the history of black Americans. The group also tion mission. And while she agreed that modifications are needed, in the districts 1989 desegregation wants changes in the districts zero _ _ tolerance policy toward student plan, she said parents should-be misbehanor, which, members said, shown problems and asked for is not applied uniformly. ideas on changes.  -........................... Majeed suggested district offi- Majeed also called for more stu- , . dent training on conflict resolution dais consider an approach to in- and for employing bus driver aides to maintain order on school buses. The Fact Finding Committee for the Little Rock School District Desegregation Plan  Is It Working : for African-.American Youth made its presentation at a special board meeting Thursday after spending several months talking to parents, j struction that holds teachers clearly responsible for student learning.The Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It Working For African-American Youth? Mr. Curtis Hall Mr. Howard Love Ms. Hafeeza Majeed Rev. Larry Staggers WcfrSKfee RECEIVED MAR 5 B Ms. Ann Brown, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 201 East Markham Street, Heritage West Building Little Rock, AR Suite 510 72201 OesesjifegaBiaT toiforiffg Dear Ms. Brown: This will confirm our understanding that Resource Speaker for the fourth community forum of The Jt-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - it Working For African-American Youth? held on Saturday, March 9, 1996, you will be the Our forum will be Is 11:00 A.M., at the Dunbar Community Center, 16th \u0026amp; Chester Streets, Little Rock, AR. Our purposes for holding these forums are to: Facilitate serious dialogue within the African-American community and the LRSD regarding the past, among its patrons of current and perceived future impact of the LRSD desegregation policies and activities on providing African-American children and youth ample and equitable educati opportunities. ion a Ascertuaaixnn aannad aaccccuummuullaattee, ftrom tthhiis process, a body of factual data and information from which African-American parents can draw valid, reliable, and collective conclusions as to which of the current arguments for and against the current plan best represent the realities of the present and the most promise for the future To accomplish our purposes, to , -  we are inviting key individuals speak at our community forums to present factual information regarding the Plan, its intent, implementation, monitoring and outcomes. design, In preparing for your presentation, the Committee reauests that you address the following: 1. Those areas and operations in the Plan that have been released from monitoring due to 1110 West 10th Street Little Rock, AR 72202 ( FAX) 501 - 374 - 9739 501 - 664 - 7818 Ms. Ann Brown, Federal Monitor March 5, 1996 Page Two their successful completion by the designated timeline or due to the inability to successfully meet the expected results in the time specified. 2. 3. Those areas and operations in the Plan that are currently working successfully and \"why-so.\" Those areas and operations in the Plan that are currently not working and \"why-so.\" You should feel free to: Bring any handouts, videos, slides, or other materials that will assist in your discussion of the various Desegregation Plan. components of the LRSD Offer any solutions, suggestions, and/or recommendations to our Fact-Finding Committee that ODM deems necessary to assist us in our process. participate in the \"Questions and Answers\" session immediately following your presentation. Please let me know if you will need audio-visual and/or other equipment to complete your presentation. You can call me at 664-7818 or write to me in c/o The Fact-Finding Committee, 1110 West 10th Street, Little Rock, AR 72202, Thank you for agreeing to participate in the process and we look forward to meeting you on Saturday. Sincerely, Ms. Convener a. t '1 The Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It Working For African-American Youth? Mr. Curtis Hall Mr. Howard Love Ms. Hafeeza Majeed Rev. Larry Staggers Mr. Dale Charles t B Ar--' I. 199fi M~ Drown. E' -ral M *3 Office of Deseere ion Monito inff 201 East Markham Street Office 0/ Op. \"} M Suite 510 Little Rock. AR 72201 Dear Ann: On behalf of The Fact-Finding Committee, I would like to thank you for your recent presentation on the history and the process of the Desegregation Plan and the role of ODM. Your comments were received quite well by the community and when contacted by phone, several desire to become more involved in individuals expressed a result of j/our lecture. o,ir public schools as a Our committee has reviewed the recorded minutes of your presentation and we would like to make the following requests: Please provide a copy of each evaluation report that identifie.s key areas of the Desegregation Plan from 1990 thru the present. Please provide information and contact persons for the following programs: a . b. Great Expectations Reading Recovery School Parks p J p p forward the requested information to: The Faot-Fj.nding Comm ee Ms, Ha 1110 We feeta 10th B. lion Ter reet Little Rook. .AR n' Mo - , ! 1110 West 10th Street Little Rock, AR 72202 ( FAX) 501 - 374 - 9739 501 - 664 - 7818 Mrs. Ann Brown April 1, 1996 Page Two We will host our last fact-finding session on Saturday, April 20, 11 A.M., at the Dunbar Community center. This session will be entitled, \"Youth Speak-Out\", and we know you will want to be in attendance to hear current and former students in our District discuss the Desegregation Plan and Strategic Plan, followed by questions and answers. Thank you again for your assistance and we will continue to work hard for our children and our public schools. Sincerely, B. Majeed P\u0026lt;Z IX or Street Number City Zip Code 1k' 'PM -p\\ -.1 ? A'S 7 USA-. )dH G I iitliitiil iiiii iii Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court  Eastern District of Arkansas Ann S. Brown, Federal Monitor 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501)376-6200 Fax (501) 371-0100 April 8, 1996 Mrs. Hafeeza B. Majeed 1110 West 10th Street Little Rock, AR 72202 Dear Hafeeza: Tliank you for your recent letter. Im happy to provide the information you requested. Enclosed are copies of our monitoring reports that focus on the Little Rock School District. You also asked for information on certain programs which the district has implemented. Although we are acquainted with these programs, we do not maintain comprehensive files on them. Tlie Little Rock School District can provide you materials on Reading Recovery and Great Expectations. 1 suggest that you contact Gene Parker at 324-0513 about Reading Recovery and Sterling Ingram (324-2124) about Great Expectations. 1 regret that 111 be out of state on April 20 and therefore unable to attend the session youve scheduled for that date. You have my thanks and very best wishes as you continue to work on behalf of our communitys children. Sincerely yours, Ann S. Brown Enc. 6/5/92 7/31/92 10/8/92 11/16/92 /12/18/92 2/26/93 7/19/93 12/9/93 1/12/94 3/11/94 9/6/94 12/21/94 12/22/94 12/22/94 1/31/95 5/17/95 5/26/95 6/21/95 8/16/95 9/15/95 9/20/95 12/1/95 1/30/96 ODM MONITORING REPORTS 1991-92 Incentive Schools Monitoring Report Monitoring Report on the 91 -92 LRSD Four-Year-Old Program Status Report: LRSD's McClellan High School Business/Communications Magnet Program 1991-92 Monitoring Report on the Biracial Committees 1991-92 Monitoring Report on the Alternative Schools: LRSD, NLRSD, PCSSD Monitoring Report: NLRHS - West Campus 1992-93 Spirit Teams Recruitment and Selection Process Monitoring Report: PCSSD School Racial Balance 1992-93 Incentive School Monitoring Report 1993-94 School Racial Balance Monitoring Report: LRSD, NLRSD, PCSSD Incentive School Recruitment Monitoring Report Monitoring Report: Involvement in the 1994-95 Principal Selection Process in the LRSD 1993-94 Incentive Schools Monitoring Report Monitoring Report: Focused Activities and Academic Progress Incentive Grants in the LRSD Status Report: Little Rock School District Incentive School Staffing 1994-95 1994-95 School Racial Balance Monitoring Report: LRSD, NLRSD, PCSSD 1994-95 Incentive Schools Momtonng Report Monitoring Report: 1994-95 Four-Year-Old Program in the LRSD Status Report on Achievement Disparity: LRSD, NLRSD, PCSSD Double Funding of the Incentive Schools (Supplement to 1994-95 Incentive Schools Monitoring Report) Status Report on Staffing: Elementary Classroom Teachers in the LRSD, NLRSD, PCSSD Replacement of Portable Classroom Buildings in the PCSSD The LRSD 1994-95 Incentive Schools Extended Year Program 1995-96 School Racial Balance Monitoring Report: LRSD, PCSSDCl CM cc\u0026lt;Jc/x: fiECE SEP 2 0 1996 J 23-3 Office Ot DesegfesaMfi Monitoring SEPTEMBER 20, 1996 THE FOLLOWING REPORT IS BEING SUBMITTED BY THE FACT-FINDING COMMITTEE FOR THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DESEGREGATION PLAN - FOR AFRICAN-AMERICAN YOUTH? IS IT WORKING TO AFRICAN-AMERICAN PARENTS AND STUDENTS IN THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT AND THE AFRICAN-AMERICAN COMMUNITY The Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It Working For African- American Youth? aWe Fighting For Our Children! 99 I B B Q OVERVIEW The Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It Working For African-Arnerican Youth? was organised in January, 1996. Our mission was to undertake an in-deoth study of the LRSD ion depth Desegregation Plan, the Interdistrict Plan and the Settlement Agreement\nthe Plan' intent, its implementation and monitoring and Its impact on African-American children. study phase, refinements After completion of the the Committee agreed to offer proposed changes and/or to the current Plan, whereever feasible, to the Office of Desegregation Monitoring, Soard of Directors. Superintendent Roberts and the LRSD {.Desegregation Plan Amendment Process, Appendix D). the intent of our Committee to meet with all partie involved in the implementation and monitoring of the Plan. It was study 3. Philosophy, 5 included a brief analysis o i the purpose, goals and objectives. Strateg Plan, Our its Our motto. In order to invite key individual \"We're Fighting For Our Children\", successfully complete our mission. guided our mission, it was necessary to Committee and groups to appear before the Fact-Finding and the African-American community to make presentations and answer questions regarding the Plan. this report to the community With the submiss ion of and recommendatiions to uDM, Supt. Roberts, and LR.jD E'irectors, our mission has been accomplished, totaling 1212 hours of valuable community mi broad cross-section of the Little Rock Commiunity. service provided by a The following is a partial listing Of individual and group\nA who were key in helping us to accomplish our mission, and to them we are grateful: Henry F, Attorney representing black parents Katherine P. Mitchell and Mrs. Williams former Supt., LRSD\npar into students in the LRSD\nand John W. Walker. Dr. Judy Magness, LRSD Board members\nMr. seen Modeste, Special Assistant to the Supt., Ms. Linda Young Do-Internal Strategic Planning Corrdinator\nMr. A\nsistant to the Frank Martin, LRCTA Representative: Mrs. Ann Brown, Federal Monitor, ODM\nLittle Rock area ministers\nformer and current LRSD students and parents\nleaders: and community residents. business area On April 20 hands 1996, members of The Fact-Finding Committee also .joined with other African-American community leaders deciare our unified commitment to public education. leaders included the following Fraternities, individuals: Fraternity, Omega Psi Phi Fraternity, Sororities and patrons to These community and Sorority, I nc\nInc\nAlpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc\nPhi Beta Sigma Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc\nZeta Phi Beta Inc\nSigma Gamma Rho .oorority, me\nKappa Alpha Psi Fraternity, Inc.\nAttorney Simmons S Smith\nkwami\nMr. H.T. Akbar. In addition, members of The Fact-Finding Committee reviewed relevant desegregation documents and reports: listened to the testimony of desegregation experts invited by Federal Judge Susan Webber Wright and conducted an Opinion c Purvey of African-American parents in the LRSD to gather data relating to the District's policies, operations and academic and social programs.Our sincere thanks are e.xtended to every individual and group that actively participated in our study and to those who provided moral support as well as other resources. The areas of discussion in this report are defined as follows: I. Statement to African-American parents in the LRSD. II. Statement to African-American students in the LRSD. \"Especially for African-American Males in LRSD\". Ill. Recommendations to African-American parents, community. students and The fourth and final section of this report - Recommendations Office of Desegregation Monitoring, Supt. of Directors - will outline proposed Koberts and the :\nt.o the ID Board current LRSD Desegregation Plan. hanges and refinements to the These recommendations presented to ODM, will be the Board and the superintendent as outlined the LRSD Desegregation Plan Amendment Process. in The Fact-Finding Committee offers this report to the African-American community because throughout our study of the Plan, our focus remained on the Plan's impact on African-Americn children and their parents in the LRSD. Parents, students, community leaders and residents spend approximately 30 volunteer hours to attend community meetings to participate in the process of studying the Desegregation Plan. It is therefore. our i.ntent to present this report to the community as a true representation of our gratefulness for the diligence and perservation of all parents. students and community members who have committed themselves to making a positive difference in our public schools. The long and ihort-term effect of our efforts shall be manifested by an overall increase in academic and social skills for African-American students in th LRSD. Thus, the over-presentation of black students in the suspension population and the disparity between black/white test results and academic achievement shall also be minimised. ODQWGY The Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It Working For African-American Youth? agreed that our hypothesis. \"Is the LRSD Desegregation Plan working for African-American Youth?\", could best be proven or disproven by our commitment to serve as the organising body responsible for developing an independent view of the LRSD's commitment to Desegregation, page 1, line 32) (LRSD Desegregation Plan, Each of us realized that by agreeing to make thi commitment to independently study the Plan and to invite the African-American community to actively participate in this process. we were, in 2effect, agreeing to remain organised and continue to serve as the independent voice for African-American oarents and students in the LRSD. Our decision to study the Plan was reached as a result of many indicators that were directly and indirectly related to the academic and ,1\nocial successes, or the lack thereof, students in the LRSD. for African-Americn Moreover, our Committee members were actively motivated to begin and complete our study of the Plan because we believe that African-American parents, students and community leaders must accept the responsibility to support and monitor current and future LRSD policies, operations, and the academic and social progress of African-American students in the LRSD. Furthermore, we are in agreement with the Survey targeting African-American parents The Fact-Finding Committee (see \"Attachments) results of an Opinion in the LRSD, developed by for the opinions, The survey asked perceptions and attitudes of the parents toward the LRSD Desegregation Plan, the Interdistrict Plan and the Settlement Agreement. The members \u0026lt; The Fact- nding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation an school halls Is It Working for African-American Youth? have walked the we are, and have been, substitute teachers, supervision aides, volunteers. students, and parents. As of our collective and consistent involvement in the LRSD, a result we understand the importance and necessity of a new and unprecedented commitment to public education by a majority of African-American parents, that we call the students and community leaders. This ommitment requires commitment leadership of the LRSD into accountability tor its 18). to Desegregation (LRSD Desegregation Plan, page 2, parents Our Opinion Survey revealed that 73% of African-American line in the LRSi? consistently do not utilise their collective parental and community resources to encourage the leadership of the LRSD to aggressively and effectively implement the Desegregation Plan as its tool for restructuring the school system so that all vestigages of discrimination, segregation or unfair treatment have been eliminated. As parents, students and community leaders. we must establish and maintain high expectations for academic and social excellence for all children in the LRSD with achievable goals and objectives that represen and talents of our student population\nand respect the diverse cultural needs desegregated educational experience. -hereby, creating a quality Our efforts to study the Plan produced rich and fertile opportunities for bi-racial community participation. We believe that we must continue to plan together to eliminate the racial barriers that preceded oui' current efforts. Therefore, it is the genuine desire of the members of The Fact-Finding Committee to unify our efforts, whenever possible, with those efforts of the Little Rock Alliance Foi' Our Public Schools\nParents for Public Schools\nand other organised groups and/or individuals who have consistently demonstrated a commitment to public education through their active involvement in our community and our public schools. 3The Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It Working for African-American Youth? submits the following report as an identification and assessment of the opinions, perceptions and attitudes of students, parents and community leaders as revealed in our study of desegregation in the LRSD. sia: r-TQ AFRICAN-AMERICAN PARENTS IN THE LRSD: \"Central to any school desegregation plan should be a clear focus and understanding of Desegregation Plan, : he kinds of goals to be achieved.\" (LRSD page 2. line 2). The LRSD Board of Directors and the superintendent have the responsibility to clearly delineate the District's desegregation mission to the staff and to the community. (LRSD Deseg. Plan, page 2, lines 21-22). 78% of .African-American parents knowledge\" of the LRSD Desegregation Plan. Settlement Agreement. surveyed report having \"no Ironically, Interdistrict Plan and African-American parents in the LRSD have an immediate responsibility to request that Federal Judge Susan Webber Wright deny any motion by the LRSD Board of Directors to modify the current Desegregation Plan until the District's desegregation mission has been clearly and adequately delineated to the African-American community. t Furthermore, The Fact-Finding Committee will recommend the Office of Desegregation Monitoring, Soard that an independent view. Supt. Robert and the represented by African-American parents, students and community representatives, be discussed regarding the LRSD Desegregation Plan, Settlement Agreement. Interdistrict Plan and \"The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has included parent involvement as among the curcial elements of the desegregation plans, and the District Court has continually stressed the importance of parent and community participation in the schools.\" Monitoring Report. July 12, 1996, ODM, page 61). (1995-96 Incentive Schools The members of The Fact-Finding Committee agree and our study reveals that the current LRSD Desegregation Plan should be discussed openly and honestly by the present litigative parties\nThe Fact-Finding Committee: Little Rock Alliance For Our Public Schools: Parents for Public Schools and all other concerned community representatives. When an agreement has been reached regarding all proposed amendment to the Plan, and majority ommunity support for those amendments is attained, only then can we support the modification of the current Plan. More importantly, we believe. is the District's and responsibility to \"clearly\" delineate the District's desegregation mission to the staff and to the community.\" ommitment 41 9 Again, allow us to cite the evidence as supported by our Opinion Survey that 78% of African-American parents surveyed in the LRSD reported having \"no knowledge\" of the current Desegregation Plan. The members of our Committee are in agreement that significantly more African-American parents must demonstrate an immediate and continuing increase in parental involvement in their child's school. African-american parents, students and community leaders must actively participate in discussions regarding neighborhood schools and all other proposed educational concepts and academic programs that are currently being researched for justifications as proposed modifications to the LRSD Desegregation Plan. Based on the results of our Opinion Survey, 66% of the Afrioan-American parent. surveyed in the LRSD, reported being \"somewhat\" involved in their child's school\n22% reported being \"greatly\" involved in their child's school\nand 12% reported \"no involvement\". involvement in your child' Through your increased and continuous parental school, you will realise that you are the best advocate for your child's educational future and through youi involvement you acquire the information and skills that are nece ssary to plan for that future. African-American students constitute 66% of the LRSD student population. This fact alone dictates that as African-Americans we are obligated to become \"greatly involved\" in the District\nand it goes without saying that \"no involvement\" will continue to result in fewer academic and social successes for our children. Thus it becomes the responsibility of each African-American student. parent, grandparent and community member to. individually and collectively, read, consider and discuss the LRSD Desegregation Plan, the Interdistrict Plan and the Settlement Agreement. Please request your copy of the Desegregation Plan by calling 324-2408, Monday - Friday, 7:30 A.M. 4:30 P.M. After receiving and reading this important document. The Fact-Finding Committee respectfully requests recommendation your approval, acceptance and follow-through of the offered in this report. sta: IT TO AFRICAN-AMERICAN STUDENTS IN THE LRSD: The members of The Fact-Finding Commirtee aggressively sought participation from students during our study of desegregation in the LRSD. of our Our Committee benefited grearly from the active involvement student representative, Mr. Mark Cole. Mr. Cole is a 1993 graduate of Parkview Arts/Science Magnet High School and is currently enrolled at Chicago State University. Mr. Cole and a panel of current and former LRSD students discussed the Desegregation Plan and answered questions for the community at our \"Student Speak-Out\", the last of six forums Fact-Finding Committee to invite the iponsored by The ommunity to actively participate in studying the Plan. - 5We believe that a student's ability to advocate for quality education within the classroom is proportionate to the student's knowledge, or lack thereof, regarding the LRSD Desegregation Plan. We, therefore, strongly encourage all students to study the Desegregation Plan. Adequate cla room instruction and effective classroom management, as outlined in the Plan, are the tools needed to create a c* afer, more productive school environment. According to the LRSD Disciplinary Management Report 11995-96), African-American students, generally, and African-American males. specifically. LRSD by 1%: 'b are over-presented in the suspension population of the In a comparison of Total Sanctions issued by race/gender in 1995-96, the following statistics represent tne over-presentation of African-American students in the Distrct. grc ss (Source: 1995-96). Little Rock School District Disciplinary Management Report Year 1995-96 Race Black Black White White Black White Gender Male Female Male Female M/F M/F Total Sanctions 3876 1446 698 207 5322 905 62 23 11 4 85 Additionally, according to the SAT published by the Arkansas-Democrat tanford Achievement Test) data score ^5 are 31 percentage point asette, 10/02/95, \"Slack student and 7 and 38 points different in lower than white grade 10.\" scores in grade 4 We, therefore, conclude that African-American students in have been, and ontinue to be, under-educated and excessive tne -D disciplined, thereby violating the intent, the LRSD Desegregation Plan, agreement and spirit of Students, it is important for you to understand the correlation between suspension and expulsion rates for African-American student and the low test scores and overall academic achievement in the classroom. Students, you nuist be inside of the classroom to receive appropriate instructional assistance and to succeed to your greatest potentials. When you are outside of the classroom, due to suspensions and expulsions, it is impossible for you to receive the instruction necessary to succeed academically and socially. - 6 -According to the LRSD Disciplinary Management Report (1995-96), African-American students are three times more likely to be suspended and/or expelled than white and/or other race students in the LRSD. African-American students comprise 55% of the District's total student population. With the realisation of these facts students and parents - we want to make it crystal clear that when African-American students misbehave in the classroom and on./off campus (off-campus behavior is also increasing the rates of disciplinary sanctions against students), zero-tolerance is more likely to be e.xercised by school and city authorities, (L.R.P.D.), thereby resulting in their removal from school. Therefore, we conclude, and it is the belief of the members of this Committee that the proper education of African-American students in the LRSD is not s. priority. Our conclusions and beliefs are supported by the individual and collective observations of our Committee members\nstudent and parent surveys, data provided by LRSD officials, Arkansas-Democrat Gazette. testimony of Desegregation experts, and the Office of Desegregation Monitoring. \"Especially for African-American male students in the LRSD\": According to ODM's 1992-93 Incentive c 45, hools Monitoring Report, page \"Some teachers may need more training than others in areas such as classroom management and organization and effective discipline. It is teachers incumbent upon the building administrator and the individual to identify areas of need and access the resources necessary to address them.\" Accordingly, The Fact-Finding Committee's Opinion Survey further revealed that ODM's statement of fact is true for educators and administrators in the Incentive Schools, Area Schools and Magnet Schools. Some administrators and educators in the LRSD, consciously or subconsciously. creater barriers that prevent them from being sensitive to the academic and social needs of African-American males in their clas circumstances These barriers exist as a resul of attitudes and in our society which as being dishonest, violent, disruptive, and stereotype African-American males hronic drug users. Unless and until all administrators and educators in our schools become sensitive to the growing academic, environmental and social odds impacting African-American males today. and effective discipline will continue to be a major 1assroom management concern. In recognition of this information, we agree that it is the primary responsibility of the student to onsciously work to decrease and eliminate the potential for school violence and insubordination in the classroom - the leading causes of long and short-term suspensions for African-American students - as reported by the LRSD Student Hearing Office in the 1995-96 Disciplinary Management Report. In 1995-96, African-American males received 62% of the total disciplinary sanctions reported by the District. - 7 -On behalf of African-American students in the LRSD, The Fact-Finding Committee will recommend a required course in \"Conflict Resolution Skills\" at the elementary and secondary levels. i This recommendation consistent with strategy #10 of the LRSD Strategic Plan (School Safety), and the comments of former LRSD Supt., Dr. Henry P. Williams to LRSD personnel, \"Student behavior and discipline concerns are explicitly addressed in strategy 10 which focuses on the development and implementation of actions public confidence in the aimed at restoring safety and security of our schools. These actions include providing ongoing conflict resolution training and skill development for our students...' It is the proper acquisition and utilization of these skills that can result in a great decline in public school violence, achievement is increased. When violence is decreased and academic we all win! Students, it is your right and your responsibility to receive the best education available in the LRSD. Your self-motivation is the catalyst needed to receive that education. You must make educational excellence\" your goal and you must not let anything or anyone inside or outside of the classroom prevent you from reaching your goal! SUMMARY: 'Academic achievement i expectations, a the result of commitment, high broad-based community support.\" trong belief that all children can learn and Monitoring Report, July 1996, page 74). (1995-96 ODM Incentive Schools We are entering the sixth week of school for the 1996-97 in the LRSD. We must seek every school term pportunity to express and demonstrate the importance of high academic achievement for all students in our District. We invite and encourage you to .join our Committee as we make a strong commitment to support quality and equal education. spoken commitments must be followed by our actions. Our We can and we must agree to increase our individual and collective involvement in our public all students. ichools, thereby. increasing the quality of education for in the following areas: We are seeking youi' support and active participation 1 Please plan to attend the LRSD Board meeting on Thursday, September 26, 1996 at 6:00 p.m., 810 W. Markham, Little Rock. Please schedule and attend a parent-teacher conference at your child's school on \"Teacher Workday\", Friday, September 27, 1996. 83. Please sign our petition to request a \"special\" school board meeting, at which time recommendations from the African-American community listing proposed changes and/or refinements to the current LRSD Desegregation Plan will be submitted to the Superintendent and Board of Directors. Involvement in our public schools is our right, our responsibility, and our obligation. The Fact-Finding Committee, through our in-depth study of the Desegregation Plan and the District, generally, identified the following areas of greatest concern among African-American parents. students, and community leaders. These areas of concern are being assigned to workgroups for further study and/or planning. workgroups will propose recommendations to The Fact-Finding The Committee for presentation to the Supt., Board and ODM. 1. 3. 4. Organise \"Friends of the Court\" to be heard by Federal Judge Susan Webber Wright. Ritalin administered to students in LRSD. Community forum with Atty. John W. Walker, counsel for black students and parents in LRSD (Neighborhood Schools). Increased enrollment students\". \"Quality Education' vs. \"Recruiting white .5. 6. 7, 8, 9. 10. 11. 12. hool Safety. Zero-Tolerance. LRSD Alternative Schools. Incentive Schools. Little Rock Central High School Conflict Resolution Skill Training (LRSD Strategic Plan) Student Assignment Requests by African-American parents Summer Echo In summary, the following comments were recorded as received from African-American parents who participated in the Opinion Survey: \"The Little Rock School District offers a quality education. however. black students, generally, do not get an equal opportunity to benefit from the higher-level academic programs provided by the District,\" \"1 would like to be more involved in my child's school. teachers and principals are very rude to black students and parents.\" but some \"We have requested that our children be assigned to School(s), denied.\" Magnet over and over again, but our requests have always been X - 9 -\"My child had to attend Summer School and it was very ihocking and depressing that the entire class was attended by black students.\" \"My child is treated like a second-class student at Central High\". \"Students in Magnet schools get a better education than students other schools in the District\", in \"I begged the District to assign all cf my children to : but they just split them up and sent them to different schools anyway. That makes it very hard for us. \"Racism in the schools is a problem - others\". more in some schools than in \"I don't want my young child to be bussed across school\". town to \"Our child has \"special needs\", by the LRSD\". and his/her needs are not jeing met \"My child is in junior/senior high school, study with him/her as much\". so I don't really need to \"I don't have a problem with my child being bussed because I believe that he./she can get a better education by attending the schools that are no located in the inner ity. Sussing is not a problem with us. We are more concerned with the lack of discipline n the bus ride to ant the school.\"  u- \"Black and white teachers spend most of students who make the best grades'. their time working with the \"The incentive schools have fewer student in the classroom, but the students' scores on tests and cla benefiting greatly from the smaller class room work show that they are not My child takes Ritalin at school and he/she does not seem to be learning at all\". \"Magnet schools create desegregation\", segregation and that i counterproductive to \"Why do African-.american males receive the most punishment in the school My child is an \"A\" student so I don't need to study with him/her. \"The schools need more black teachers to teach black children\". \"The Board members are very divided and that is causing great problems for oui' District\", 10\"Why did the board want to buy out Dr. Williams' contract\"? \"I think the schools are fine, the teachers are doing a good job, but we need to see more black parents volunteering in the schools\". \"I am not pleased with the separation of the races at Central High\". \"Some black and white teachers in my school don't work well together\". \"I am working two, three, four jobs: I cannot visit my child's school\". \"The survey is a good idea. What will be the results\"? was -old thar my child could not attend elementary school attendance sone because the school is filled to capacity'. in my i want my hild to attend him/her to have equal resources compared to school in my neighborhood and I want chools located in predominantly white neighborhoods\". I want to receive more information from my school regarding the LRSD Desegregation Plan\". \"Education is not equal in the LRSD because there are Magnet schools. Incentive schools and Area schools\": \"Why?\" RECOMMENDATIONS: It i c the LRSD parental our recommendation that more African-American parents in should generate the required efforts to increase their involvement from being \"somewhat\" involved in their child's school. involved to becoming \"greatly\" It is our recommendation that African-American tudents in the LRSD organise an effort\nthat set forth a, raise she awareness f LRSD student its primary goal to o regarding their opportunity to impact the present and future quality of education in the LRSD by gaining a knowledge and understanding of the Deseg. Plan's obligations and ommitments to African-American students attending Magnet. Incentive and Area schools. It is out' recommendation that African-American leaders. \"team\" business leaders, parents ommunity and students designate a from the community that is committed to representing the academic and social interests of African-American children in discussions regarding proposed amendments to the LRSD Desegregation Plan. Furthermore, it is recommended that thi 'team\" establish parties. a view independent of the present litigative 114. It is our recommendation that members of The Fact-Finding Committee. African-American parents, students and education specialists meet with members from the Little Rock Alliance For Our Public Schools and Parents for Public Schools to have a healthy exchange of ideas regarding proposed amendment, Deseg. Plan, prepared by The Fact-Finding Committee.  to the We would be grateful to have participation from all present litigative parties to the Plan at this \"idea\" e.xchange. 5. We recommend that a required course in \"Conflict Resolution Training and Skills Development\" be offered to primary and secondary LRSD students. LRSD's Strategic Plan, strategy ttlO. This recommendation is consistent with 6, We recommend that African-American parents, students and commuity members define the strategy (strategies) that should rake ertect in the event that our recommendation deaf ears fall on the or our Susan Webber Wright. district's leadership and/or Federal Judge report is respectfully submitted by: The Fact-Finding Committee For The LRS It Working For African-American Youth?  I Desegregation Plan - Is Ms. Hafeesa Majeed, Mr. ,Howard Lqvs iusinessman signature Chairperson 'signature date Mr. Mark Cole, Student Rep. Mr Businessman ' signature date Curtis Hall signature date Rev. Larry Staggers, Paren signature aate Attachments - 12 _ \"ATTACHMENTS\"OPINION SURVEY FACT-FINDING COMMITTEE Dear Parent: The Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It Working For AfricanAmerican Youth? would like your opinions on parent perception and attitudes toward the LRSD Desegregation Plan, Interdistrict Plan and Settlement Agreement. 1. I have read, partially or entirely. the LRSD Desegregation Plan. the Interdistrict Plan, and the Settlement Agreement. AGREE DISAGREE 2. I have been informed, formally or informally, about the LRSD Desegregation Plan, the Interdistrict Plan and the Settlement Agreement. AGREE DISAGREE SOURCE I have no knowledge of the LRSD Desegregation Plan, Interdistric Plan and Settlement Agreement. AGREE DISAGREE 4. Did your child attend a LRSD school during the 1995-'96 school term? YES NO Name of Schcol(s) 5. Were you sati 199.5-'96? ied with your child's school assignment in 6. ____ YES ____ NO Did you request another school for your child in 1995-'96? YES NO (Name of School)Was your request granted? YES NO Will your child attend a LRSD term? school during the 1996-'97 school YES NO Name of Schoolfs) n Are you satisfied with your child's school assignment for the 1996-'97 school term? YES NO 9. Did you request another school for your child in the 1996-'97 school term? YES NO Name of SchoolCs) 10. Was your request granted? YES NO 11. Please rate your involvement in your child's school: NO INVOLVEMENT SOMEWHAT INVOLVED GREATLY INVOLVED 12. How much time do you spend studying with your child at home? 15-30 min. 30 min. - 1-2 hrs. 2 hrs. + per day 1 hr. per day per day per day NOTE: Please use the following scale for ftl2-15: SA-Strongly agree\nA-Agree\nN-Neutral\nSD-Strongly disagree D-Disagree\n13. In my child's school. I can easily access information regardingschool policies, school operations, and my child's educational progress. 14. In tny child's school, there is a positive chool climate which improves academic excellence, student discipline and attendance. 15. In my child's school, principals and teachers demonstrate the belief and expectation that all children can learn. 16. In my child's school, equity of educational opportunity and of educational access are the norm. 17, Have you been asked to respond to a survey regarding the LRSD Desegreation Plan, Interdistrict Plan and Settlement Agreement? YES NO By whom? 13. Would you like to receive an invitation for your family to attend a reception to hear the final report from The Fact-Finding Committee regarding the LRSD Desegregation Plan? YES NO Name Address City State ZipIMPORTANT MEETING AFRICAN-AMERICAN PARENTS \u0026amp; STUDENTS IN THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1 BiI rbnt dtj   IS DESEGREGATION WORKING FOR AFRICAN-AMERICAN CHILDREN IN THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT   Questions \u0026amp; Answers Session with Attorney John Walker  Community Input is Critical \u0026amp; Invited Saturday, January 20,1996 11:00 A.M. DUNBAR COMMUNITY CENTER 1001 West 16th Street (16th \u0026amp; Chester Streets) For More Information Contact Hafeeza Majeed, ( SOI) 664 - 7818 The Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It Working For African- American Youth? COMMUNITY MEETING ( Second In a Series) Guest Panel Mr. Frank Martin, Executive Director Little Rock Classroom Teachers Assoc. LRSD Classroom Teachers Partial List of Desegregation Concerns Expressed at 1st Community Meeting:  LRSD Zero Tolerance Policy  Mobilizing Parents, Community, \u0026amp; Organizations  Education Curriculum Revisions to Reflect LRSD Majority Population  Teacher Accountability  Public Schools Boycott  Charter Schools Act  Responsibility of Churches  Neighborhood Schools  Mentoring in Schools \u0026amp; Community  Models of Effective School Districts  Increased Participation in the LRSD by African-American Males  Encouraging Student Participation at Community Meetings SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 1996 11:00 A.M. DUNBAR COMMUNITY CENTER 1001 West 16th Street ( 16th \u0026amp; Chester Streets ) For More Information Contact Hafeeza Majeed, ( 501) 664 - 7818 The Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It Working For African- American Youth? Were Fighting For Our Children! COMMUNITY MEETING (Third In a Series ) Resource Speakers Dr. Henry Williams, Superintendent Little Rock School District Ms. Judy Magness, Board Director Little Rock School District All former \u0026amp; current students \u0026amp; parents in the LRSD are encouraged to attend! SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 24,1996 11:00 A.M. DUNBAR COMMUNITY CENTER 1001 West 16th Street (16th \u0026amp; Chester Streets ) For More Information Contact ( 501 ) 664 - 7818 The Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It Working For African- American Youth? afFe re Fighting For Our Children!  I COMMUNITY MEETING (Fourth In a Series) Resource Speaker Ms. Ann Brown, Director Office of Desegregation Monitoring All former \u0026amp; current students \u0026amp; parents in the LRSD are encouraged to attend! SATURDAY, March 9,1996 11:00 A.M. DUNBAR COMMUNITY CENTER 1001 West 16th Street (16th \u0026amp; Chester Streets ) For More Information Contact ( 501) 664 - 7818 The Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It Working For African- American Youth? 6Were Fighting For Our Children! I COMMUNITY MEETING ( Last Fact-Finding Meeting) Resource Panel Ms. Linda Young Co-Internal Coordinator- . strategic Planning/ New Futures Liaison All former \u0026amp; current students \u0026amp; parents in the LRSD are encouraged to attend! SATURDAY, March 23, 1996 11:00 A.M. DUNBAR COMMUNITY CENTER 1001 West 16th Street (16th \u0026amp; Chester Streets ) For More Information Contact ( 501 ) 664 - 7818 YOUTH SPEAK-OUT Sponsored By The Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It Working For African- American Youth? aWe^re Fighting For Our Children! Panel of former graduates \u0026amp; current students discuss Desegregation Plan \u0026amp; Strategic Plan 9. SATURDAY, April 20,1996 11:00 A.M. DUNBAR COMMUNITY CENTER 1001 West 16th Street (16th \u0026amp; Chester Streets ) WANTED: Motivated, Articulate, Knowledgeable students to serve on panel For More Information Call ( 501 ) 664 - 7818 or ( 501) 374 - 2946 LRSD ADMIN. BULDIN6 9^7 Fax:1-501-324-20 12:26 P. 02/01 Little Rock School District For Immediate Relea.se LRSD Board to Meet with Community Group November 6, 1996 For more information\nSnellen Vann, 324-2020 The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District (LRSD) will hold a special meeting with a community group which is reviewing the district's desegregation plan. The special, meeting with the Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan will be held at 7:00 p.m. on Thursday, November 7, 1996, immediately after the agenda meeting which begins at 6:00 p.m. Both meetings will be held in the Board Room of the LRSD Administration Building, 810 West Markham. MEDIA NOTE\nThe agenda meeting, which normally begins at 5:00 p.m., will start at 6:00 p.m. on November 7, 1996. 810 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501)324-2000 Lets Talk About Education  All LRSD Students \u0026amp; Parents Invited  (Arkansas Education Association) Members \u0026amp; Guests Invited Is Education Equal For All Students In The Little Rock School District? REcen -YES ^7 1996 Office of _X_- NO ^segregation Monit( ^9 (Source: 1996 Survey of African-American Parents in LRSD) Dont Miss This SPECIAL MEETING With: Dr. Don R. Roberts {LRSD Superintendent} LRSD Board of Directors The Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It Working For African- American Youth? Thursday, November 7, 1996 7:00 p.m. LRSD Administration Building 810 W. Markham St.  Desegregation Recommec^dations to Supt. Roberts and LRSD Board.  Special Discussion - \"Making The Education Of Black Students A Priority in The LRSD.\" Do Your Part To Make Education Equal For All Students - We Want To Hear From You. Call: THE FACT-FINDING COMMITTEE (501) 664-7818 \u0026amp;SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN AND WESTERN DISTRICTS OF ARKANSAS 600 WEST CAPITOL AVENUE, SUITE 302 little ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-332S NOV J 1996 Office of ^ntoih'ig ^^^aregation November 8, 1996 Ms. Hafeeza B. Majeed, Chairperson The Fact-Finding Committee 2603 S. Brown Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72204 Dear Ms. Majeed: This is in response to your letter of November 8, 1996, in which you enclosed a copy of the report of The Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It Working for African- American Youth? I am always happy to hear of parents' interest in their children's schools and I appreciate the Committee's interest in the implementation and monitoring of the LRSD Desegregation Plan. Your letter and report will be placed in the file of the Little Rock School Desegregation case. I am also sending a copy of your letter and report to the parties in case because I want them to be aware of the Committee's interest in participating in any process for amending the desegregation plan. Thank you again for expressing your interest. Sincerely, Susan Webber Wright The Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It Mr. Curtis Hall Mr. Howard Love Ms. Hafeeza Majeed Rev. Larry Staggers Mr. Dale Charles Working For African-American Youth? lairs November 7, 1996 RECEIV\"^ NOV I 1996 Office of Desegregation Monitoring received WRIGHT NOV 0^1996 U. 3, DISTRICT JUDGE I B The Honorable Judge Susan Webber Wright 600 West Capital Street Suite 302 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Judge Wright: The Fact-Finding Committee For The Little Rock School District Desegregation Plan - Is It Working for African-American Youth?, respectfully requests the opportunity to appear in your court. African-American parents, students and community members are eager to share with you our concerns and recommendations regarding the implementation and monitoring of the Little Rock School District Desegregation Plan. The Fact-Finding Committee and members of the African-American community believe that view, independent of the present litigative parties responsible for the implementation and monitoring of the plan, is long overdue. a Enclosed is a copy of a report, with recommendations to the African-American community, that was presented by our Committee on September 20, 1996. On Thursday, November 7, 1996, our Committee will present recommendations for amending the Desegregation Plan to the LRSD Board of Directors and Superintendent Roberts, at a special board meeting. With the presentation of our recommendations to the Board, we are, in effect, following the Desegregation Plan Amendment Process, (Deseg. Tool Kit, April 2, 1996, Appendix D). However, Judge Wright, the Amendment Process does not guarantee the Community an opportunity to be heard by you. Therefore, we prayerfully request the opportunity to present our concerns to you, in person. The Honorable Judge Susan Webber Wright November 7, 1996 Page Two The Fact-Finding Committee For The LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It Working For African- American Youth?, and many community members have spent long hours surveying parents, listening to the testimony of desegregation experts, reviewing documents, reports, and statistical data provided by LRSD administrative staff. Your favorable response will be greatly appreciated. Please mail your reply to: The Fact-Finding Committee, c/o Ms. Hafeeza B. Majeed, Chairperson, 2603 S. Brown Street, Little Rock, AR 72204. Please contact me by phone at 664-7818. Respectfully, Chairpi i|ee: ''son 7 } ' The Fact-Finding Committee for Desegregation Plan - Is It Working For African- American Youth? i5A Weli^^^iiiagEar OiwChttdrei^ !I f 7 COMMUNITY MEETING (Fourth In a Series) Resource Speaker Ms. Ann Brown, Director Office of Desegregation Monitoring AU former \u0026amp; current students \u0026amp; parent in the LRSD are encouraged to attendl SATURDAY, March 9,1996 11:00 A.M. DUNBAR COMMUNITY CENTER 1001 West 16th Street (16th \u0026amp; Chester Streets) For More Information Contact (501)664 - 7818  atju^JT-aBn^rft r- M.W. * { The Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It Working For African- American Youth? Were Fighting For Our Children! ^1 COMMUNITY MEETING ( Last Fact-Finding Meeting) Resource Panel Ms. Linda Young Co-lntemai Coordinator-'' Planning/ New Futures Liaison All former \u0026amp; current students \u0026amp; parents in the LRSD are encouraged to attend! SATURDAY, March 23, 1996 11:00 A.M. DUNBAR COMMUNITY CENTER 1001 West 16th Street (16th \u0026amp; Chester Streets ) For More Information Contact ( 501) 664 - 7818 The Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It Working For African- American Youth? biBq B J COMMUNITY MEETING (Second In a Series) Guest Panel Mr. Frank Martin, Executive Director Little Rock Classroom Teachers Assoc. LRSD Classroom Teachers Partial List of Desegregation Concerns Expressed at 1st Community Meeting:  LRSD Zero Tolerance Policy  Mobilizing Parents, Community, \u0026amp; Organizations  Education Curriculum Revisions to Reflect LRSD Majority Population  Teacher Accountability  Public Schools Boycott  Charter Schools Act  Responsibility of Churches  Neighborhood Schools  Mentoring in Schools \u0026amp; Community  Models of Effective School Districts  Increased Participation in the LRSD by African-American Males  Encouraging Student Participation at Community Meetings SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 1996 f * it I 6* I 11:00 A.M. DUNBAR COMMUNITY CENTER 1001 West 16th Street (16th \u0026amp; Chester Streets ) For More Information Contact Hafeeza Majeed, ( 501) 664 - 7818 The Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It Working For African- American Youth? Were Fighting For Our Children! \u0026amp; J COMMUNITY MEETING (Third In a Series ) Resource Speakers Dr. Henry Williams, Superintendent Little Rock School District Ms. Judy Magness, Board Director Little Rock School District AU former \u0026amp; current students \u0026amp; parents in the LRSD are encouraged to attend! SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 24,1996 11:00 A.M. DUNBAR COMMUNITY CENTER 1001 West 16th Street (16th \u0026amp; Chester Streets) For More Information Contact (501)664 - 7818 school poi '3 0 scnoo: progress.\n?eraoions. and my \u0026lt; Id's educational In my child' J\" school. a positive school \u0026lt; imate which improves academic excellence, student discipline and attendance. . Tn my child's school. principals and teachers demonstrate the belief and e.xpectation that all children can learn. IS. Tn my child's school. equity ot educational opportunity and of educational access are the norm. 17. Have you been asked to respond to a survey regarding the LRSD Cesegreation Plan. \" Tnterdistrict Plan and Settlement Agreement? Yao NO 5y whom? IS. Would you like to receive an invitation for your family to attend a reception to  Fact-Finding Commit - 'he final report from The .-raing the LRSD Desegregation Plan? YES NO Name Address City State ZipIMPORTAM MEETING AFRICAN-AMERICAN PARENTS \u0026amp; STUDENTS IN THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 0 C\" BiillH IS DESEGREGATION WORKING FOR AFRICAN-AMERICAN CHILDREN IN THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ? n  Questions \u0026amp; Answers Session with Attorney John Walker  Community Input is Critical \u0026amp; Invited Saturday, January 20,1996 11:00 A.M. DUNBAR COMMUNITY CENTER 1001 West 16th Street (16th \u0026amp; Chester Streets ) For More Information Contact Hafeeza Majeed, ( 501) 664 - 7818 OPINION SURVEY FACT-FINDING COMMITTEE Dear Parenr: r?, Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegrecation =lan - 3 Working For African-American Youth? would like vour oo'inions or parent perception and attitudes toward the LRSDDeses^-sat^on'\" egrsgacion Plan. Interdis'tnc'C Plan and loet'tlemen't Afifreecnenv I have read. the Interdi partially or entire! triCt Plan. and t he the LRSD Desegregation Plan. tert lament .Agreement. y. e AGFRE DISAGREE I have been inxormed. Desegregation Plan, the Interdistrict formally or informally, about the LRSD Agreement. tne cett.ement I 9 AGREE. DISAGREE SOURCE -q nave n knowledge of an .nd .e LRSD Desegregation Settlement Plan. A in p r' 3 AGREE DI sag: 4. Did your term? Ic attend a LRSD school during the 1995-'56 school rib NO -Name chool ( s I Were you - oap-- ' oj sat d with assignment you request\nia NO another noo 1 tor UI' 1 19S5-'P6': 1 1\nio .NO or Schoo1)q  c  \u0026lt; /(as your cues 3 sranteaT YES NO Will your ch term? attend a _SSD school during the 1996-'97 YES NO ?i ame OOI1S} Are you satisfied with your child' 1996-'97 school term? YES NO sc. 1 3 school assignment for the Did you request another' school for your school term? hild in the 1996-'97 your :aa NO Name of School! s) scuest gr.ant YES NO 1 * Please rate your involvement in your child's school: NO INVOLVEMENT SOMEWHAT INVOLVED GREATLY INVOLVED . How much time do you spend studying with your child at home? 15-30 min. 30 min. - 1-2 hrs. 2 hrs. - per day 1 hr. p, ?\u0026lt;5r day cay per cay NOTE: Please use the following scale for #12-15: SA-Strongly agree: A-Agree: N-Neutral7 SD-Strongly disagree D-Disagree: 13, In my child's school. I can easily access information regardingRECEIVE!^ NOV 1 2 1996 Office of Desegregation Moniionng SEPTEMBER 20, 1996 THE FOLLOWING REPORT IS BEING SUBMITTED BY THE FACT-FINDING COMMITTEE FOR THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT DESEGREGATION PLAN - IS IT WORKING FOR AFRICAN-AMERICAN YOUTH? TO AFRICAN-AMERICAN PARENTS AND STUDENTS IN THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT AND THE AFRICAN-AMERICAN COMMUNITY The Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It Working For African- American Youth? aWe\u0026gt;e Fighting For Our Children! A cact- i.tg F Tjni o Desegregation Agreement: the an. o OVERVIEW Che Ian's was .ept.n secregaz i earn In-ceraistricc Plan and the .tent. s impact on African-American dy phase, .e Oemmi o  -- - .an - Danuarv, LRSD rerineiaents to the Its implementation se agreed hildren. urrent Plan. iertiement and monitc -zis snd After completion of the to oxfer preposed changes and/or wnereever feasible, to the Office 5\nAinendnent ProcesB, , LRSD It was the intent oi our Conmittee to meet with\"ill involved in the mpiementation and monitor! hilosophy. .'-icteo pose. analysis \u0026lt; ng / 1 goal and\nect ategii Appendix parties Ian. xan. tJur its ' '-ir\" uiO'Cto w order to \"We Fighting ror successfully complete tn idren our r 10 our missidn. was necessary to  the Fact-Finding invite key individuals and groups to appear .terore -.ommittee and the African-American community to -ake i,\".c answer questions regarding the Plan. report to the community ana reccmmen.cati'-Cxus rotniJ\nDirectors, our mission nas b^en accomplished, aling 1212 ..ours ot vaiuaole community service provided bv a crcaa cross-section of the Little Rocx Community. ns regarding r le T\u0026gt; r. to appe-ar he commu: and recemmen.: presentations omission of Jirectcrs, our mission has of valuable communi y servi .*2! -pllowing IS a partial listing of --o key in heiping us to accomplish i _ : Dr. .-.enry P. Williams former -Supt., were grateful: torney represent! -Catherine ?, Leon Modests, M one tc ODM, Supt. individuals and groups who our mission. and to them we are g ciacK parents and 1 and yjr  Judy studen' -RSD: John W. Walker, s in the LRSD\nDr. pecial Assistant to the -tupt.. \"ms -o -nternal strategic Planning Corrdinator: Mr ---------- Federal Monitci, .hepresentat ive: T) ^upt. , rd members,' M . Linda Young Frank Martin, LRCTA ODM: Little Rock area ministers: -ormer anc current LRSD students and oarent- .--usiness leaaers: .and community residents. former end current LRSD apa a On .April 20, 1996, members of The Fact-Finding -tanas with other African-American community leaders and patrons ommittee also joined leaders are our un -ndividuals: Fraternity, included ied commitment 1 1 '^mega Psi public education. lowing Fraternities, .0: Alpha Phi r-hi Fraternity, rorit -no\nto These community and eta .Sigma ni - ---Pha Fraternity, 1 inc\ni\u0026lt;eita Sigma Theta Sorority, -Fraternitv. rority, vexta oigma iheta Sorority, Inc: --rity, .nc: Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity I kwami\nMr. ri.T. Akbar. Zeta Phi Beta gma Gamma Rho Smith: .\nAttorney Simmons desegregation documents The Fact-Finding Committee reviewed desegregation e and reports: listened to the testimony relevant and conducted an Opinion  - . xAauenea uo tne testimony of xperts invited by Federal Judge Susan Webber Wright n ODininn siirvo.. A.P__a__________ . , -p-n , purvey of African-American parents in the '/j - ^ata relating to the District's policies, operations and academic and social programs. to the District's policies.Our sincere rhanks are extended tc ever/ actively participated in cur study and support as we ether resour\nto individual and group those who provided t .ne areas ct oiscussion in tnis report are defined as JS: III. ctatement to African-American parents in the LRSE Statement to African-American students in the LSSD. \"Especially for African-American Males in LllSB. RecommefKiations to African-American community. ?ai*ents. students ana The fourth and final section Office of Desegregation Monitor tnis report mg. itecommendation, or Directors - will outline proposed c .p ?erts current LRSD Desegregation Plan. nanges ana re These recommendati presented to ODM. the Board and the superintendent the LRSD Desegregation Plan .Amendment Process. air inding Committee oan-Hmerican community our focus remained- on the Plan's and their parents in the LRSD. mers t.uis oecause t.nro-t\nur and residents spend approximately impact i Parents. 1 tne . nemen: 9 ms will as outlined stuav ir 'he ican-Arnericn r\n,6 .an. ten community meetings to Desegregation Plan. 30 VO 1 u: participate in the uaen eer community -saaero hours to attend report to the It is therefore. 1' the diligence and community as a true reores our i process o studying A tent ntation of to present t IS \"cmmun y embers perservation cur grateful a^ 11 rerence our wnc publ ave lommitted parents, students emsei -ng maxing a The scnocis  efforts shall be manifested by o.. uveraii academic and social skills for African-American Thus, the over-presentation of black students in population and the disparity between black/whi our nort term er o. overai increase in stuaents in th the suspension L, academic achievement shall also oe minimized. te test results METHODOLOGY -he *act Finding t.ommittee tor the LRBD- I'ese^r^sat Working For African-American Youth? Fact-Committee tor t .te  couic :D Desegregation Plan working agreed tnat tor oest ce proven or disproven by our Afrloan organizing body responsible for developing the LRou s commitment to Desegregation. tor\nn oui' n:. Amen\nPlan - : zpothesi\nn commitment an indepenaent to serve es ew e page 1, 1ine 32) ILRSD Desegregation Plan. aoh of U3 realized that oy agreeing independently study the Plan and community to actively participate to -o maxe this commitment to invite the African-American in this process. ve were. tn 2effect, agreeing to remain organised and continue to serve as the voice for African-American parents and students in the oKSD. '-'ur aecision to study the Plan was reached as a result of inaicators that ware directly and indirectly related many UHOL worts airectiy ana inairectly related to the academic and social successes, or the lack thereof, for African-Americn students in the LRSD. Moreover, our Committee members wore actively motivated- to begin and complete our study of the Plan because i believe-.thafc African-American parents, students and coamamity leaders must accept the responsibility to support and monitor current and future LRSD policies, operations, and the acadea^c social progress of African-American students in the LRSD. Moreover, our Committee members we and c. 'urthermore, we are in agreement with the results of an Opinion curvey targeting African-American parents in the LRSD, developed i no n a __k 1 i w/, i !_______iiM.^ , ... ___ * The Fact-Finding Committee (see \"Attachments\"), for the opinions. The survey asked , perceptions and attitudes of the rai?onts toward tne oRbD Desegregation Plan, y Settlement Agreement. the Interdistrict Plan and the .nem'oers nan f The Fact-Finding Commit Is It Working for African-American Youth? the LRSD Desegregation school halls: we are, and have been. have walked the substitute teachers, supervision aides, volunteers, students, and parents. As a result or our collective and consistent involvement in the LRSD, we understand the importance and and parents. necessity of a new and unprecedented commitment to public education by a majority of African-American parents, students and community leaders. This commitment requires that we call the leadership of the LRSD into accountability for its _8 I . mmitment to desegregation (LRSD Our Opinion Survey revealed that desegregation Plan, page 2. O/ of African-American line parents in the LRSD consistently do not utilise their collective community resources to encourage the leadership of the lRSD to aggressively and effectively implement the Desegregation ,Ian as its tool for restructuring the school system so that ail vestigages of discrimination, segregation or unfair treatment have been eliminated. As parents, student.e suH pnmmnni tw As parents, students and community leaders, i U8t establish and maintain high e.xpectations for academic and .Hence for all children in the LRSD with achievable and objectives that represent and respect the diverse cultural needs ano talents of our student population: thereby, desegregated educational e.xperience. goais resting a quality Our efforts to study the Plan produced rich and fertile opportunities for bi-racial community participation. We believe that we must continue to plan together to eliminate the racial carriers Therefore, it is the genuine desire of the members of The Fact-Finding Committee to unify our erforts, whenever possible, with those efforts of the Little Rock Alliance For Our Public Schools: Parents for Public Schools: ana other organised groups and/or individuals who have consistently ommunity participation barriers that preceded our current efforts. ommitment to public education through their active involvement in our community and our public schools. - 3 -t nding \\ king for African-Ameri\ndentification and tudes of students. an U' -esegregation ?ian is Ir submits the following report as cur study of desegregation in the LRSD. assessment of the opinions, perceptions and parents and community leaders as revealed in STATBHgWr TP AggrCAM-AMRBTnAli PARiarrS IH THK entral to any school desegregation plan should be a clear focus undex'aJ.ending - -ne /imas of goals to be achieved \" -esegregation Plan, page 2, line 2). The LRSD Board cf Directors ana the superintendent have o . line 2 f goals to -LRSD e District's desegregation mission the responsibility to clearly delineate immunity. (LRSD Deseg. cf African-Amer r _ an. page to the staff and to the nes 1 . owledge\" flament of the an sarents surveyed Agreement. bittu cesegregati report naving n an. erdist -ronicaliy, 'no Ct Plan and African-American parents in the LRSD have responsibility to request that Federal Jr. an immediate age Susan Webber Wright j.env any motion by the LRoD Board of Directors to modify the current -esegregation Plan 'matil the District's desegregation mission has clearly^and adequately delineated to the African-American -immunity, furthermore. The Factfindine Commitaa ':'/ill neoommpnr\nteen tne ?ff ice Furthermore, The Fact-Finding Committee\nard that an of Eesegregation Monitoring, independent v ents. stuaents a tommu.n V our represented . Robe Africa regarding the LRSl\u0026gt; ^'esegregation Plan, Settlement Agreement, representatives. rts and the o-American iscussed -nterdistrict Plan and he Eighth Circuit Court a a? among the curcial elements of f Appeals has incl'udsd parent involvement the desegregation plans, and the district Court has continually stressed the importance of parent and community participation in the schools,\" /\u0026lt; Monitoring Report, July 12, A binding Committee agree and 1996, ODM, (1995-96 Incentive Schools page 61), The members of The . - -ur study reveals that the current ? Desegregation Plan should be d ^resent litigative Alliance For artie ihe cussed openly and honestly by 'Jur Schoc is: Fact-Finding Commi Parents tee\nLittle all ether concerned community representatives. for yuclic Schools and -vnsn an agreement has been reached regarding ail proposed amendment .. ,,ne Plan, and majority community support for those amendments is a ained, lan. - _________ _______ ______________ IS nly then can we support the modification if the current More importantly, we believe. O' upport is the District's commitment and responsibility to ''cleaLrly delineate the District' s desegregation mission to the staff and to the community,\" - 4am. aiiow us Tjrvey that SX s avijience as supported h an-Amerlean tea naving .-:ncw\n.SG2e  fie parents surveyed Opinion current I'esegregati\" in the LRSD s T.enjoers . mai 1 in aareetnent that s more African American parents must demonstrate xuu continuing increase in parental involvement in their African-american parents. actively participate in students and and all other proposed educational snir an immedic cnii ommunity leaders t. ciscussions regarding neighborhood that aj?e currently being researched concepts and academic fications tc the LRSD Desegregation Plan. tor justifications cased on the results of a can-.Amer i our Opinion Survey nti: ana : schco1. st schools programs as proposed somewhat\" greatly\" olvemenf . involved in involved in ed i tne '.n oivement in your 66% of t repor -.6 ret eo eins --- -_-~.ted beif -hild s schco..\nand 12% reported Through ycur increased and Inild's s hil s schoc1, ---you will tne best advocate for your child's educational ur involvement you acquire tne 1 entinuous parental realise no tnat you are ary -tute Ma e intcrmat anc .-..mer future and through 3K1. car. tates that as stuoent greatly involved\" lean-Americans we involvement al successes will in the District: pu_a are and i ontinue to result i ter our children. US r'o*-' an. Is that are students fact alone oligated to become gees without saying that lewer academic and It becomes the responsibility of each African-Ameri grandparent tivei the 1 . reac. terdist and cemmuni member cons anc dis ''-is 3 :ne Man and lest day your copy Friday. ' the Set indi' LRSD can student. iduaily and Desegregation tne \"rSO A.M. -esearegaticn\nIan Cement Agreement. Please tnis important document, requests your approval. 4:30 P.M. cy After calling 324-2406. receiving and reading a ne tact rinding Committee respectfully oommenaations o ceptance and rered in this report. follow-through of the 3TATPMKNT TO AFRICAN-AMRRTCAN STUDENTS TN THE T.RHD: e members of me ract-f rt 1 ipation .'ur from students curing inding Committee aggressive sought Committee our stuay \u0026lt; our student great 1 rom ate representative. Mr. Mark Cole. ci Parkview Arts.- ence M f desegregation in the tne ac Mr. e involvement le is a 1993 and i s ... ----  ...jh School ourrentiy enroiiea at Chicago State University, panel of current and former LRSD students discussed the desegregation Plan and answered questions for the community at our Student bpeak-Out\". the last of six Magnet : Mr. Cole and a Fact-Finding Committee to invite participate in studying the Plan. the forums sponsored by The community to actively - 5\u0026lt;ve ce.,.,.^,.^ a ouuueuu a aointy to advocate for oua-'- education within the classroom is proportionate to the stuae knowledge, or lack thereof, regarding the LRSD DeseeregaS-^ We, therefore, strongly encourage ail students to studv tne Desegregation Plan. Adequate classroom instruction and arrA. evii '^hat a s'Cudan'C 3 abiii'cy to advocate Z' the 3tuaenr'3 - instruction and effecti as outlined in the Plan. to create a safer-, more productive classroom management. are tne school environment. tools needed According to the LRSD Disciplinary Management Report African-American students. specifically. generally LRSD :v 19% are cver- esented i e in a comparison rican-Ame ension to 1995-\nitan \" a Ct race/gender in 1995-96. the following statistics over-presentation of African-American stuaents^'in i-owins ti represent Little Rock School District Ziscic 1995-96). 'cource: tne strct nary Management -Addi Year 1995-96 Race Black Elaczi -'Tn Wh Black ^White Gender Male Female Male remale M/F M Total Sanctions 3.3^6 1446 6.98 J cnaiiy, according t the SAT : published by the Arkansas-uemocrat Gat scores are .31 percentage ana and 33 o points ewer terent i , ,'\"Q 1 white eveme.' /oc acit c\u0026gt; ''Je. have conci and that Afr tne uaents. and t continue ed. *hereb desegregation Plan. an-rti er-e. an c. 5.ting che t is important suspensi .e low test .n ana e.tpu scores and Sion Classroom. Students, Instruct i and c\u0026gt; o o aireement 'incerstand rates overall Afr acaaemic ana tne cor an-.Amer : 1\nn an achievement 1 you must be inside of the classroom onai assistance and to succeed t to receive appropri When you are outside of the classroom.' your greatest due to suspensions . . . . . -------------------v*-' -xw'iiO BUG e.\u0026lt;puisicns. it is impossible for you to receive the instruction necessary to succeed academically and t is socially. - 63 ican-Amer an ed and ? cr*^\n:en tuaents are .xpelled tna. -.Amerioa.n s .^ati on. ' tnree n white y ^^snaseinen u fceport\nes aaore likely d/or other mprise z5% a A With the real at ion ese tacts - 3'tuden'fcs and parenti It crystal clear that when African-American stude want misbehave in the classroom and on/off also increasing he rates of campus (off-campus disciplinary sanctions agai: t jhavitr students), zero-tolerance is more likely to be exercised jy sc ^d city authorities, (L.R.P.D.), thereby resulting in their r jy from school. Therefore, we conclude, and it is the belief of memoers of this Committee that the -A ican-.America. elusions and 1 students i proper education of emovai the tne collective observations of beliefs are supported o priority. the individual and jur our Committee members: student and surveys, data provided by LRSD officials. ~es mony or .esegregation experts, oring. ana Arkansas-Liemocrat Gat parent o t.te If f ice cr vesegrecati aapecially tor Africnn-Ameriran maie students in the LRSD\": A-\ncrding to ? 1992-95 Incentive Monitoring Report, as Some teaor.ers may need more training ____ ______ classroom management and organization and effective di sc id tnan others in areas IS incumbent upon the building admini page such a teachers to necessary t .entity ddress areas of need and a them. ' trator and the individual csss the resources revealed g L S. that /M's statement a Commit oi tact true icr. for vey tur er educators and administrators in the Incentive Schools. Area Schools and Magnet schools. Some administrators and educators in the LRSD, consciouslv hools. r subconscicuslv. creator barriers that prevent them from beins sensitive to the academic and social needs cf African-American in their classes. rcumstances in our These barriers e.xist as a result cf attitudes mates and  society which stereotype African-American males violent, disruptive, and chronic reing dishonest. , aisruptive. ana cnronic drug users. Unless and until all administrators and educators in our schools ceccme sensitive as the growing academic, impacting African-American to set ve SCI ne will males today. environmental and g continue Classroom management be a ma.jor concern. ecognition tf this information. we agree that it IS the prima responsibility of the student to consciously work t________ iminate the potential tor school violence and insubordination tn the classroom - the leading causes of long and short-term suspensions for AfricanAmerican students  as reported by the I student Hearing Office in the 1995-96 Disciplinary Management decrease and Report. In 1995 96. African-American males received 62% of the total disciplinary sanctions reported by the District. - 7 -behalf cf Afr can-.America,n students in the LRSD, The Fact-Finding imittee will recommend a required course in \"Conf'ior ^esoiut^- L_i3'' at the elementary and secondary levels. This recommenaat consistent with strategy aio of the LRSD Strategic Plan Pafsty), and the comments of former LRSD Supt.. Dr. Williams to LRSD personnel. eisnenrary 1 o required curse in secondary levels. -  Henry P. student behavior and discipline concerns are explicitly addressed in strategy 10 which focuses the development and implementation of actions School on public confidence in the safety and securi aimed at restoring a\nns include providing ongoing confli y cf cur schools. These deveiopmenc for our ana utilisation these sk uden ' T .a in public school violence. .at t resolution training and t IS tne proper acquisition lavement 3 increasea. *nen we all violence win: result in a great decline IS decreased and academic uaents. est educati it is your right catalyst needed to n available in ana your the respons receive educational excellence\" --.oi,'. :cu cucation. ity to receive the f-motivation is th anyone ir goal! yc, You must make inside cr outside of tne ana you must not let anything or c_assrcom prevent you rrcm reac.- SUMMARY: .aoaaemic acnievement 13 tne ations. a strong orcaa-casea oommuni ' oeiief support. resu.t ot that all commitment. lidren Monitoring Report, July 1996. page 74). . lyyo-cD ODM can igh learn and incentive Schools We are entering the sixth week of school for the 1996-97 school We must seek every opportunity to express and aemonstrate the importance or high academic achievement for all in the LRSD. ek school term Students in cur District. ve invite and encourage you to join ou Strong commitment to support Committee as we make a spoken commitments must be quality llowed ana equal education. Our st agree t increase cur cur actions. our public schools, tnereby. ai uai lect udents. We are We can and we ve involvement i in the following areas: seeking increasing the quality of education your support and ac participa tor Please plan to attend tne LR: 3card meeting cn Thursday, September 26, 1996 at 6:00 p.m., 310 W. Markham, Little Rock. Please schedule and attend a child's school on parent-teacher conference at .eacner Wcr ay , Friday, Septemoer 27. you: 96. - 8.-.ease s meeting, tcmmunit 3 C 2 t: request a e c omme .nda 11 o ns eciai scnooi 5oara S*= lurrent Super i.t public tenoe.tt scncois anges and/or an will be s rem rhe African-Amer emenrs r.ae **0 VI car. obligation. . o 3ur rignr. responsibility, emen* jr a The Fact-Finding Committee. -\"^ough our in-depth stucy of the desegregation Plan and the District, generally. . ---' --------identified the -ixawing areas or greatest concern among African-American tuaents, and community leaders.  These areas of concern ai^e being assigned to workgroups for further study and/or planning. ' 'orxgroups wil_ prepose recommendations to Ths Fact-Finding propose re The \"ommittee for presentatior. to the Supt., ooard ana OEM. 9 \u0026gt; Organise Friends of the Court ' to ousan Webber Wright. Ritalin administered to students in te neard oy Federal Judge Oommunity forum with students and parents creased enrt_lment .at tv John W, Juaj.1 students . School Safety. Zero-Tolerance. LRSD Alternative Schools. Incentive Schools. Little Rock Central High School Neig V Fd oounsel for black tonc'- vs. IS , Recruiting white . Conflict Resolution Skills udent Assignment Re ummer Schoo 1 quests Training by Afri  LRSD S can-Amer rategi Plan) can parents .n summary, the following comments were Afrlean-American recorae parents who participated in ths as received from Opinion Survey: 'The Little Rock School District offers a quality black students. education. y^ever. _oiacK stuaents, generally, do not get an equal opportunity trom the ..igher-level academic programs provided by the . O 1 X. t . general would like co \"sa ners and pr oe more cipais involved T'O  T O ** in my c la a to bla school. but some students and 'We nave requested that Schoolf s ), ienied.\" our over and over again. children be assigned to Magnet out our requests have always been - 9 -cn cepressina naa t that attend cummer the entire class noo i ana 'f/as verv was attended by black Xing cents lid 1 treated -ixe a seccnd-class stuaent at an . otudents in Magnet schools get other schools in the District'. a better education than stuaents X cegged the District to assign they just split them up and That makes it very hard for sent us. \" ^11 cf \u0026gt;117 children to them to rerent schor _____ out antway. ^^acism in the schools is a problem others\". more in some sch\n5 IS .an t want my OCX ycuna chi  own /or child has 'special needs', by tne LRSD\". and his.'her neeas are not ceina Study with mor. senior 1 nim.-'ner as much\". aon have a tnat he.'she can are not located problem with get a better in the inner my child education city\". cussed oecause attending the scnco-s at not a ne problem with tne OUS us. ide re concerned wit.n X a o it n and white 3 who make tea' ners sper.a most a \"The incentive students' scores c benefiting greatly fiy tne oest grades '. schools have fewer tests and from the c lassroom sma Iler : . t .ne show tiassr t na t om. ~.r.e out lass sices . t.ney are r child takes Ritaiin at school and he/she does -earning at all\" not seem to  M Magnet schools segregation\". create segregation and .at mtertr: ict ivhy do African-.american males receive the most punisnment in tne My c lild is an student so 1 don't need to study with him/her. The school  need more black teachers to teach black children . The ooard members are problems for cur Tistrict\". very divided and that is causing great 10 -r. i ^he ooard want t 0U3 _r. Williams' concracr ? rut we need ik rhe schools are to see mors tine. clacK rhe reachers are doing parents volunteering in a good the s\"' ICO is I am not pleased with the separation of the races at Cent 1 High . \"S. dme black and wrtiite teachers together'. in my school don't work well \"I am wrking two, three, four jo'os\nschool\". I cannot visit my child's 'The survey is a good idea. What will be the results\"? d that my child could , - --------not attend eiementarv schon' - -\u0026gt; attenaance sone oecause the school is filled s ri to capacity'\". want my child to attend school nim/her to have eoual resources . - --------compared t preaominantiy white neighborhoods\". in my neighborhood and I want schools located in want receive more LRSD Desegregation Plan , informaticn scnoci regarding t ,e ^Education is not equal in the LRSD because school incentive schools and Area schools\": there are ^iagnet \"Why?\"\" RECOMMKHDATTONS: IS parental  recommendation the LrtSD snould generate at mere -an-American parents i e the required efforts to increase their involvement from being somewhat\" involved in their child's school. involved to becoming \"greatly\" T recommendation that African-Americ LRSD organise an effort that an students in the - ---- sets forth as its primary goal to raise the awareness of LRSD stud--  j' a ax ..j impact the present and future LRSD by gaining a knowledge an's obligations and and ents qual regarding their opportunity y understanding \nof education in the the Deseg. -.t tend ing tlagnet. .acent 'mmitments to African-Zunerioan ve and .Area oCflOClS . students z is our recommendation that .African-American leaaers, business leaders. ' team\"\" community . , -- parents and students designate .rom the community that is a committed to representing the academic and social interests of AfricaA-^iJc:\n' emSJiSi ciscussions regarding proposed amendments Desegregation Plan. t::----- team\" establish parties. Furthermore. to the LRSD in a it is recommended that this view independent of the present litigative - 11 -Z3 cur Committee. . specialists ?cx' Public .\nea^ .V rsccsanendaz i aembers A can-rtme mesr L'eseg. Plan, xcnan-e . prepare- of 4.ne Facc-?indin\u0026lt;^ rican parents, students and education memoers from the Little .Hook .alliance F arenis cm or ochoois zo have a be grateful to ha^-e parri\nregaroing preposed amendment^-tcach* ract-Finding Committee. T~, \\ .1 ~ ion from ail present littgafciw- ne parion UiEQQid the Plan at this idea ' exchange. We reconaend that a required , --I..-!-, - ~ , course in 'Conflict ResolutXonr. Training and skills I'eveiopment'' be offered to ~ secondary LRSD students. LRSD'8 Strategic Plan, strategy #10. Wia recommend nat oommuity members take effect in z'. tear ears an Web'cer 'in\n -- 1.0 primary recommendation is conaiaBaarttirith can-.aner cerine e event can tne strategy that o parents, students and  strategies) that should cur recommendations fall on the Leadership and.- or rederal Judge re-a pie Fact-Finding Committee For The _t Working For .Africaui-.American Yc desegregation Plan - Is . hafeeza Ma.jeed. Chairperson . .Howard L^vex^ua lusinessman hr. .hark Cole, Student Aep. r.at -a date ! STffnature ignature cate r.yieurtis naxi, ignature Mr -cur Suslnessman date -arry Staggers, rarent 2^ y J J -cate taohaents ' 12\"ATTACHMENTS\"UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN AND WESTERN DISTRICTS OF ARKANSAS 600 WEST CAPITOL AVENUE, SUITE 302 LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-332S SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT JUDGE Qi S^iicn i^'Q^f^liiil,CiKig November 8, 1996 Ms. Hafeeza B. Majeed, Chairperson The Fact-Finding Committee 2603 S. Brown Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72204 Dear Ms. Majeed: This is in response to your letter of November 8, 1996, in which you enclosed a copy of the report of The Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It Working for African- American Youth? I am always happy to hear of parents' interest in their children's schools and I appreciate the Committee's interest in the implementation and monitoring of the LRSD Desegregation Plan. Your letter and report will be placed in the file of the Little Rock School Desegregation case. I am also sending a copy of your letter and report to the parties in case because I want them to be aware of the Committee's interest in participating in any process for amending the desegregation plan. Thank you again for expressing your interest. Sincerely, Susan Webber Wright The Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It Working For African-American Youth? Mr. Curtis Hall Mr. Howard Love Ms. Hafeeza Majeed Rev. Larry Staggers Mr. Dale Charles Bl ISI November 7, 1996 NOV ! c 1996 Office Of Dos\u0026amp;g.'og\nreceived WRIGHT NOV 0 21996 U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE R 0 ^3 The Honorable Judge Susan Webber Wright 600 West Capital Street Suite 302 Little Rock. AR 72201 Dear Judge Wright\nThe Fact-Finding Committee For The Little Rock School District Desegregation Plan - Is It Working for African-American Youth?, respectfully requests the opportunity to appear in your court. African-American parents, students and community members are eager to share with you our concerns and recommendations regarding the implementation and monitoring of the Little Rock School District Desegregation Plan. The Fact-Finding Committee and members of the African-American community believe that a view, independent of the present litigative parties responsible for the implementation and monitoring of the plan, is long overdue. Enclosed is a copy of a report, with recommendations to the African-American community, that was presented by our Committee on September 20, 1996. On Thursday, November 7, 1996, our Committee will present recommendations for amending the Desegregation Plan to the LRSD Board of Directors and Superintendent Roberts, at a special board meeting. With the presentation of our recommendations to the Board, we are, in effect, following the Desegregation Plan Amendment Process, (Deseg. Tool Kit, April 2, 1996, Appendix D). However, Judge Wright, the Amendment Process does not guarantee the Community an opportunity to be heard by you. Therefore, we prayerfully request the opportunity to present our concerns to you, in person. The Honorable Judge Susan Webber Wright November 7, 1996 Page Two The Fact-Finding Committee For The LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It Working For African- American Youth?, and many community members have spent long hours surveying parents, listening to the testimony of desegregation experts, reviewing documents, reports, and statistical data provided by LRSD administrative staff. Your favorable response will be greatly appreciated. Please mail your reply to: The Fact-Finding Committee, c/o Ms. Hafeeza B. Majeed, Chairperson, 2603 S. Brown Street, Little Rock, AR 72204. Please contact me by phone at 664-7818. Respectfully, (Ms.) :ee: . Majeed ChairpCTSon IMPORTAM MEETING AFRICAN-AMERICAN PARENTS \u0026amp; STUDENTS IN THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 0\\ BlIiilH IS DESEGREGATION WORKING FOR AFRICAN-AMERICAN CHILDREN IN THE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ?  \"Questions \u0026amp; Answers\" Session with Attorney John Walker  Community Input is Critical \u0026amp; Invited Saturday, January 20,1996 11:00 A.M. DUNBAR COMMUNITY CENTER 1001 West 16th Street (16th \u0026amp; Chester Streets) For More Information Contact Hafeeza Majeed, ( 501) 664 - 7818 schcoi co i sc\n?er3:\n3ns. and my c id's educational c 1 pvoeres in my chii\u0026lt; cnco. improves academic excellence. a past ive scnooi c imate which student discipline and attendance. . in my child's school. principals and teachers demonstrate the belief and e.xpectation that all children can learn. . In my child' school. equity educational access are the norm. of educational opportunity and of Hav! you been asked t respond to a survey regarding the LRSD Lesegreation Plan, interdistrict Plan and Settlement Agreement? Yas NO 5y whom? 13. Would you like to receive an invitation for your family to attend a reception to Fact-Finding Committc - \"he final report from The .-ruing the LRSD Desegregation Plan? YRS NO Name Address City State 7'- IThe Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It Working For African- American Youth? BtrIaItH B B 1 COMMUNITY MEETING (Second In a Series) Guest Panel Mr. Frank Martin, Executive Director Little Rock Classroom Teachers Assoc. LRSD Classroom Teachers Partial List of Desegregation Concerns Expressed at 1st Community Meeting:  LRSD Zero Tolerance Policy  Mobilizing Parents, Community, \u0026amp; Organizations  Education Curriculum Revisions to Reflect LRSD Majority Population  Teacher Accountability  Public Schools Boycott  Charter Schools Act  Responsibility of Churches  Neighborhood Schools  Mentoring in Schools \u0026amp; Community  Models of Effective School Districts  Increased Participation in the LRSD by African-American Males  Encouraging Student Participation at Community Meetings SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 1996 11:00 A.M. DUNBAR COMMUNITY CENTER 1001 West 16th Street (16th \u0026amp; Chester Streets ) For More Information Contact Hafeeza Majeed, ( 501) 664 - 7818 The Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It Working For African- American Youth? We re Fighting For Our Children!  91 B COMMUNITY MEETING (Third In a Series ) Resource Speakers Dr. Henry Williams, Superintendent Little Rock School District Ms. Judy Magness, Board Director Little Rock School District All former \u0026amp; current students \u0026amp; parents in the LRSD are encouraged to attend! SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 1996 11:00 A.M. DUNBAR COMMUNITY CENTER 1001 West 16th Street (16th \u0026amp; Chester Streets) For More Information Contact (501)664 - 7818 The Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It Working For African- American Youth? Were-Fighting For Our Children!  ai COMMUNITY MEETING (Last Fact-Finding Meeting) Resource Panel Ms. Linda Young q. Co-lntemal Coordinator-^ rategic Planning/ New Futures Liaison All former \u0026amp; current students \u0026amp; parents in the LRSD are encouraged to attend! SATURDAY, March 23, 1996 11:00 A.M. DUNBAR COMMUNITY CENTER 1001 West 16th Street ( 16th \u0026amp; Chester Streets ) For More Information Contact ( 501) 664 - 7818 The Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It Working For African- American Youth? i i s 7 COMMUNITY MEETING (Fourth In a Series) Resource Speaker Ms. Ann Brown, Director Office of Desegregation Monitoring All former \u0026amp; current students \u0026amp; pareirts in the LRSD are encouraged to attend!. SATURDAY, March 9,1996 11:00 A.M. DUNBAR COMMUNITY CENTER 1001 West 16th Street (16th \u0026amp; Chester Streets) For More Information Contact (501)664-7818 '  -St- JU \"J T-3! J* B Dear Parenr: OPINION SURVEY FACT-EINDIMG COMMITTEE The Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - Working For African-American Youth? would like your opinions parent percept m and acti es toward r.he Z Interdistrict Plan and Settlement Agreement. I have read. partially the Interdistrict Plan. or entirely. .e ana the 13 on :D Desegrsgai:ion Plan. 5D Desegregation Settlement Agreement -an. .-.'jnro. DISAGREE I have been inxormed. formally or informally. Desegregation Plan. Agreement. the Interdistri\nabout the LRSD nave terd 4. .n tne t-ement AGREE, DISAGREE SOURCE .ttcw AGREE DI SAG Did your o term? Were you sat you dge of S.X1 'Sind attend MO .Mame recuest the LRSD Desegregati Settlement A r eement a LRSD school e zne 1SS5-'56 scncci. I d witr ass me nt NO another noo J. ror t 1955-'56'\n NO .Name oq  ,1 ycur Will term? * o cues: your o. sranrec YES NO a attend a LSoD YES NO school during the 19S6-'37 =cr CHS Are,you satisfied with your child's school assignment f 1996-'97 school term? YES NO id you request anothei' school chool term? fcr your ar tne hild in the 1996-'97 Was your ease 'YES NO Name of SchooICs) request gr-anti\nYES NO rate your involvement in your child's school: NO INVOLVEMENT SOMEWHAT INVOLVED GREATLY INVOLVED . dew much time do you spend studying with your child at home 7 NOTE : 15-30 min. 30 min. - 1-2 hrs. 2 hrs. per day 1 hr. Cl per day - per cay cay l*sase use the following scale 3A-3trongly agree: for #12-15: 3D-5trcngly disagree A-Agree: N-Neutral: D-Disagree: 13. In my child's school. I can easily access information regardingij V aiat?:  - NOV 1 2 1996 Office of Desegregatcn ivniiQnny bEPTEMHER 20, 1996 THE FOLLOWING REPORT IS BEING SUBMITTED BY THE FACT-FINDING COMMITTEE FOR THE LITTLE ROCK SQKX)L DISTRICT DESEGREGATION PLAN - FOE AFRICAN-AMERICAN YOUTH? IS IT WORKING TO AFRICAN-AMERICAN PARENTS AND STUDENTS IN THE LITTLE HOCK SCHOOL DISTRICT AND THE AFRICAN-AMERICAN COMMUNITY The Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It Working For Afriran- American Youth? aWe^e Fighting For Our Children!^ r act- ing F n S e o o -esegregation Agreement: the OVERVIEW . :2Eix^ an. :\nne an's 'leprr gani o In^eraiscricz Plan and the anuarv. LRSD tent. zzs impact on African-American Its implementation and n: oertietnent dy phase, t hildren. '.on it.: S After completion of the .neaents to the current Plan, se agreed to ozfer preposed changes and/or whereever feasible. to the Office of Deae^gation Monitoring, Superintendent Roberts'aAd the LRSd' Directors. .Desegregation AinonriinAin.r a___ u). It was the intent of\nDesegregation Plan Process, t Ct our Conmittee to meet with all Appendix involved in the implementation and monitoring 7- inoiude-d -a triaf analysis of t?,e .St: parties A nilosophy. t 't'O se. goal and 0\nect rategio Ian. Fl.an. Cur its cr motto, n order to We Fighting ror Our \u0026lt; successfully nvite key individuals and complete cur r .ren o o \"i . cur missidn. mmittee and the African-Amerlean groups to aorear t ore cue commu: me answer cuescions regarding T-'.ic report c.., die community , r.cberts, and LRSD Directors, our mission ? totaling 1212 hours of valuable conairunitv tne fia.c. .-^i and recommen.'i.a : make was necessary tc  the Fact-Findin tne ons resentaticns mission cf tc ODM, Supt. as ceen accomplished. ----------i ^--S trovided bv a crcaa cross-section of the Little Rock Community. VI -ne tollowing is a partial listing of individuals and groups who were sey in neiping us to accomplish Dr. Henry P. Williams grateful: our mission torney repre Katherine ?, M - tormer .Supt. . anting black parents and studen ne 1 and Mrs. .juuy Mag:oess .g and to them we are SD: .John W, Walker in the LRSD: Dr.\nd rd members\nM s\u0026gt; -ecn Modeste^ opeciai assistant to the .lupt.t Ms. Linda Young -nternal strategic Planning Corrdinator: t' Representative: Mrs. Ann Brown. Federal Monitor, area ministers: former and current LRSD students .:usiness leaders\n.and community residents. pecial Assistant to the Mr. Frank Martin, LRCTA On April 20, former and current ODM: Little Rock anc parents: area 1996. members cf The Fact-Finding nands with ether African-Ameri leaders are our un dividuals: included d commitment can community leader ommittee also joined 1 sc public omega Psi owing Fraterni education. eternity rority, rcrity, : Alpha Phi nc: ijeita Smith\nhi Fraternity, les. Inc: Ipha Fraternity. Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc: A 1 B __  .nc: Kappa Alpha Fsi Fraternity, kwami\nMr. n.T. Akbar. and patrons to These community rorities and i cet.a .Sigma Zeta Phi Bet.a gma (Jamma Rho .\nAttorney Simmons addition, members of The Fact-Finding Committ desegregation documents and reports: desegregation ee reviewed relevant listened to the testimony of -xperts invited by Federal Judge Susan Webber Wright ^a^conducted an Opinion Survey of African-American parents in the -.r.oi-' oata relating to the District's policies. LRSD to gather and academic and social programs. operationserrsc::. agreeing to remain organized and independent voice for African-Ameri LRSD. continue co serve as the can parents and students in the Our decision to study the Plan was reached as a resuic of many  --------------------s.* Cl icauxu OZ man XT inaicators that were directly and indirectly related to the academic and social successes, or the lack thereof, for African-Amr.\u0026lt;^  motiJ^tXl.^? Moreover, our Committee members were-actively complete our study of the Plan because believe^,fchet African-American parents, students and cnmwmUtTr leaders must accept the responsibility - * to the academic Moreover, our Committee members we xcavicro iBuot. accept tne responsibility to support and monitor policies, operetione: Md th. SSSSSc social progress of African-American students in the LRSD. and Furtnermore, we in agreement with the results of an Opinion African-American parents in the LRSD, developed by .he fact-Finding committee (see \"Attachments\"). ~ tor the opinions. 'ur thermo re, are the LRSD Desegregation Plan, The sturvey asked perceptions and attitudes of the parents toward Settlement Agreement. the Interdistrict Plan and the ' nan members c . - Is It The Fact- inaing Committee Working for African-American the LRSD Desegregat uch? have walked the scnool halls: are, and have been, substitute teachers. supervision aides, volunteers, students, and parents. As a result or our collective and consistent involvement in the LRSD understand the importance and   of our collective and and parents. we . necessity ox a new end unprecedentsc commitment to public education by a majority of African-American parents, students and community leaders. This commitment requires This chat we call tx^e leaoership of the LRSD into accountability for i = commitment_to desegregation (LRSD Desegregation Plan, cage 2. l^n- -8 . . Our upinion ourvey revealed that of African-American parents in the LRSD 'an . onsistently do not utilize their collective \"d community resources to encourage the leaderstetp of the lRSD to aggressively and effectively implement the Desegregation Plan as its tool for restructuring the school system so that all vestigages of discrimination, segregation or unfair treatment have been eliminated. As parents, students and community leaders.  must estaolish and maintain bi ch e.xpectations for academic and establish high social e.xcellence for all childre we and objectives that represent n in the LRSD with achievable ... . - ana respect the diverse cultural ana talents of our student population: goal 3 needs esegregated educational e.xperience. thereby, creating a quality Our efforts to study the Plan produced rich and opportunities for bi-racial fertile ommunity participation. We believe that we must continue to plan together barriers that preceded our current efforts. Therefore, it is the members of The Fact-Finding Committee to unify .,,, _ _ *------- With those efforts of the Little Rock Alliance For Our Public Schools: \" current efforts. to eliminate the racial our efforts, whenever possible. AnH .rh . duoiic Schools\nParents for Public Schools: ana other organized groups and/or individuals \\ groups and/or individuals who have consistently remonstrated a commitment to public education through their involvement in our community and our public schools. active - 3 -am. axj-ow -^s rvey that '5% 3 ce s zvi^encs as supcorea : an-Amerlean -'or tea naving parents T.emcers .-mcwiscee surveyed\nur in tne current Z'esegre^ati' LRSD - a r more African-American .cmmi1 in agreement that gnir pairents must demonstrate an immedic continuing increase in parental involvement in their Af nt-y ana schco1. cnix lean american parents, stuaents and community leaders .t. regarding neighborhood and all other proposed educational concepts and academic programs \"r.at _ar currently being researched for justifications as proposed mccitications to the LRSD -esegregaticn Plan. actively participate in students and concepts and academic for justifications cased on the results of i oan-.Amer cur Opinion Survey o st schools somewhat\" greatly\" involved in tne 66% of tne D. reported oivement\". oivement in involved in their child' s scnoc..\nThrough ycur increased and your n senO' 1. you w the best advocate for your child's educat 1 r involvement 'ary .cute Pu.a.- you acquire the inrermat a ne 0/ ... o anc 1 no/ oeing erted being reported no entinuous parental realize cnai mat you are future and through can iiotates chat as .A greatly involved\" stuaent can-.amerleans we are _ is that are students fact alone involvement al successes will in the District: and i ontinue to result 1 tor our children. ligated to become ces without saying that fewer academic and -US an, becomes the responsibility or each African-Americaui student. grandparent tivei the Z lest iay and cemmuni member t . reaa. terdist youi' copy Friday. ' consi ict P the oer ana Ian and \":30 A.M. is important document. guests your approval. eccmmendations o CIS' the tne individually and inShi desegregation Zesegregaticn x Settlement Agreement. 4:30 P.M. -an After 3 e Please oy calling 524-2400. Tact-Finding Committee receiving and reading :ceptance and respectfully rerea in this report. follow-through of the STATEMBMT TQ AFEICAN-AMKRICAN STUDENTS IN THE T.RHD: Tne members of me ract- rt 1 at ion inaing Committee aggressively sought '.'ur Ccmniittee cm students curing o our stuay c desegregation in tne a cur student great _ rom cate representative. Mr. Mark Cole. me act invo1vement of Parkview Arts.- cience M Magnet Mr. Cole is a 199.3 gh Schoo1 currently enrolled ac Chicago' State University. panel of current and former LRSD students discussed ana IS Mr. Cole and a the -esegregation rlan and answered auestions for the cemmunitv -at our 'Student Speak-Out\", the last of Fact-Finding Committee to invite participate in studying the Plan. six forums sponsored by The the community to actively - 5feel eve '-'hst 3 student s sDixx'cy sdvocs'c education within the classroom is proportionate to uxaaaroom 13 proportionate to the 3tuaent' = knowledge, or lack thereof, regarding the LRSD Desecre  We, therefore-, strongly encourage ail students to ^tud Desegregation Plan. to study Bati:n .e Adequate classroom instruction and ^ffa^ classroom management, as outlined in the to create a safer-, more productive Plan. are tne tools school environment. aecea According to the LRSD Disciplinary Management African-American students, generallv. ana c-p specifically. LRSD 19% are over- esented i Report can-.Amer a n s in a comparison of 7 Q race/gender in 1995-96. the foil ensicn *  r owins over-presentation of African-American s tics !cource: 1995-96). Little Rock School District tuaents in represent Addi hl Discit ne strct nary Management Year 1995-96 Race Black Elacx '.'Tn Wh onaiiy, according t published by the Arkansas scores are and ~ and percentage -J Gt tne We. have tneretcre ocnci and con cioi ed. thereb:. nue tne Gender Male Female Male cemale M/F zA\" : -Democrat points as over O yrs oesegregation Plan. that Afr iating t an- V* _ in uaents. t is important or etween u ana e suspensio.n and e.xpui LDv test scores and :ion rates Classroom. overall Students. instruct! you muat be inside of the onai assistance and When you are outside of the expulsions. t is impossible Total Sanctions 3376 1446 698 veir.e ano ex e* p p erstand cr Afri academic acii ?.r. tne corr can-Ameri an achievement i Classroom to succeed t Classroom. necessary to succeed academically and to your tor you to receive receive apprct greatest due to suspensions the instri potent and socially. % - 6can-.Amer i enoed and .n aent stucents are expelled rhi -o-.Amer 1 can a u^ati c.n. y ..anaaemenc t.tree n white tucer-a Seporr . .es nors iikeiy a ether f.prise s ~c = o With the realization of to make it crystal clear .nese facts - stnidents and parent! that when African-American stude misbehave in the classroom and on/off campus (off-campus want uiioucnavc in me Classroom on/orr campus (off-campus\nhavi:r also increasing the rates of disciplinary sanctions agai* t students), zero-tolerance is more likely to be exercised ly sc ^d city authorities, (u.R.P.D.', thereby resulting in their r 3V from school. conclude, and it is the belief of members of this uomsiittee that the proper education of Arrican-Aser sions and e* sP^cents xn tne uxi eiiefs are supporcec : act a prioricy. the individual and Our -ciieccive ocservacions oz our uominiccee ineinbers\nstudent anH surveys. data provided by LS5D official emovai the test Mcni iony or .esegregation experts, sring. anc t Arkansas-iiemocrat\nice of parent a vesegreca Sapeciaily ior African-Aaericsn male students in the LRfiD\": Ac erding to 1992-93 Incentive Monitoring Report, as Some teaoners may need more training ____ ______ classroom management and organization and effective than others page in areas sucn IS incumbent upon the building administrator and teachers n.ecessary to entity ddress areas of need and the.m.  cess the the discipii individual resources I'evealed giy. that ?M's statement Commit .3 A n vey rur __ --------educators and administrators in the Incentive Schools. Area Schools and Magnet cchools. Some administrators and educators in the LRSD, consciouslv cr subconsciously, creator barriers that prevent them from beins hools. itive to their classes. the academic imstances or tact s true tor that prevent and social needs of African-American males These barriers exist as a result of attitudes and -n our society which stereotype African-American males as oeing dishonest.violent. disruptive, and chronic drug users. Unless and until aii administrators and educators to ome sensitive to the growing academic, s impacting .African-American in our schools environmental and ve SCI ne will males continue t today. Classroom management be a ma.j concern. necognitio.n if this information. we agree that it is responsibility of the student to consciously work t the pr a decrease an: -iminate the potential tor school violence and insubordination i.n the classroom - the leading causes of long and short-term suspensions for AfricanAmerican students  as reported by the i student Hearing Office in the 1995-96 Disciplinary Management Report. In 1995 96. African-American males received 62% of the total disciplinary sanctions reported by the District. - 7 -oehaif of African-Amerloan cmittee will recommend Lils'' at the elementary sru required a ao.- ents in rhe LRSD, The ?acr course cndary in 'Conf ieveis. Tliis Ct resoluri  inding recommendaC oonsistent witn strarecy jJlO the LRSD Strategic Plan t Sch Safety), and the comments of former LRSD Supt., Dr. Henry p. student behavior and discipline concerns are explicitly addressed in strategy 10 which focuses the development and implementation of actions COl Williams to LRSD personnel. on public action, aimed at restoring onfidence in the sarety and security of our schools, include providing ongoing conflict resolution train! These skill development anc utilisation o r our s hese sk rUdents. . t resolution trai.ning and in public school violence. When tnat can result proper acquisitior lavement increased. violence win: is uaents. it is your right oast aducati catalyst needed to available in and the your respons in a great decline decreased and academic A ' v to receive the receive 'educational excellence\" cucation. -motivation is t I OU must make A anyone ir goal! inside cr outside of tne ana you must not let anything c_assrcom prevent you rrcm reac SUMMARY: aaemic ac evement ations. a on? 3 tne 'oelie resui f that commitment. g-i a oroac-casea communi support. Monitoring Report, July 1396. page 74). . 15So-c6 ODM ran can learn and Incentive Schools We are entering the LRSD. ek of school must seek every ooportunity t demonstrate the importance the 1996-97 school term students in our District. express and Ct high academic achievement for all ve str invite ana encourage g commitment you to to support join OU. spoken commitments must be quality .and 1lowed agree t increase our di Committee as we make a equal eaucation. our actions. le: Our We can and we ve involvement i cur puDuc scnoois. tnereby. increasing the quality of education udents. are in the following areas: seeking your support and active participat tor Please plan to September 26. attend * e ir,: 3card meeting on Thursday. 1996 at 6:00 p.m. , 310 W. Markham. Little Rock. Please schedule and attend a child's school Teac.ner Workday parent-teacher conference at criaay. September 27. your 6. - 8 --- .sase s meeting, communit V* o 30 3 eciai eoommendati ed changes ons and.' rem one Af a school board eoien can-.Americ s \"o tne -luper intenoenc public schools obligation. 3ur The Fact-Finding T.-immi r.r.i=A. o.-- eoien* respcnsibilioy, 'Jr a through our in-depth stuny of the desegregation Plan and the District, generally, identified the iiowing areas of greatest concern among AfricanAmerican parents, students, and community leaders. These areas of concern are beinc These areas of concern are being assigned to workgroups for further study and/or planning. workgroups will propose recommendations to Ths Fact-Finding I'cmmittee for presentation to the ~ s a. ons r ai 2oard and CTM. The Organize Friends of Susan Webber Wright. Ritalin administered to one Cour'o ' :e heard V Federal Judge Jommunioy forum with Aooy ooudenos and parenos .creased enr\nj.meno soudenos i John W Juali Mei students'. School Safety. Zero-Tolerance, LRSD Alternative Schools. Incentive Schools. Little Rock Central High School 10. Oonflict rcesoiuoi n udeno Assignmeno n\ncummer School II '-jaixer. Fkills Training  onct' a quests oy ar - n summary. counsel for black SchccIs J. 'S . .-.ecruioing whior Soracegic Plan) lo.an-amer oan parenos the following comments were African-American parents recoroe as received from participated in ' e Opinion Survey: \"The Little Rock School District black students. offers a quality education. , ivever, olacK stuaents, generally, do not get an equal opportunitv oenefit from the higher-level academic programs provided by the would like co be more ea oners and pais inVOivec 3 ,.5 , X.. in my a cniio o blac but some students and its. nave requested that our children be assigned to Magnet .tchooi(s), over and over again, but our requests have always been lenied. - 9on ceprsssing naa t that attexid cummer ^r.e entire class r.oo - = R3 was ve rv was attended by 1 -3' tKtng tcent. Id created like a seccTi-class stucent at antr 9 i students in Magnet schools get a better education \"han c-in(\"'-o ether schools in the District'. '1 begged the District to assign they just split them up and That makes it very hard for sent us. \" all cf my children to them to terent schor ________ out s anyway. \"Racism in the schools is others\". a problem ore some schools tr.an t want my young 0 OCi -ur onild has 'special needs\", by tne LRSD\". and h ner neeas are not ceing e 1'. sent stuay with nim/her as much'. *'.9 don't have rcblem with tnat are s.'she can get a better not located in the inner my child education city\". r '.^336-^ oecause sending rhe schcoIs .ar cussing 1 problem wit? C it an.c w nts who xne srucenrs' ne rn^ cus oe * a wirn :naxe t eac.ners the best sper.c\nt.o grades ' a incentive schools have r ewe r srucer  C cenefiting grearlv rssr anc from rhe 0 lasst'ocin snrw oiassr: tnat t\nrm. cur smaller class ey 3,re n: sizes hy child takes Ritalin at -earning at a school and he/she does seem t  a  M 'agnet schools desegregation'. create segregat ion oct Why co Atrican-.american males receive the most punisnment tne My child is an \"A\" student so - don't need t.o study with him/her. 'The schools need more black teachers to teach black children 'The prob Soard members are very divided and that is -ems tor cur district '. causing great 10ny d the ioard wane - out _r. williams' contract ik the schools are te. tut *e need to see sors the teachers are doing a tlacK parents volunteering in tne oca .-co. a -hools I am not pleased with the separation of the races at Cent 1 high\". Some black and white teachers in my school don't work well together\". \"I am working two, three, four jobs\nI cannot visit my child's school\"'. \"The survey is a good idea. What will be the results'? told that my child could - was niy caiid cculd not aLrend eiementary school i a'Ctandancs zone oecausc cn school is rilled co capacicy\". want my child to attend school im/her to have equal resources in my neighborhood and I want predominantly white neighborhoods'. comparea chools located in want receive more IKSD Desegregation Plan . information scnoci regarding t .e iducation is not equal in the LRSD because schools. incentive schools and Area schools': there are ^lagnet \"Why?\" RECOMMENDATIONS: IS recommenaat i on .at mere tne parental can-American parents i uxtSD snould generate the required efforts to increase their involvement from being \"somewhat\" involved to becoming \"greatly\" involved i.n their child's school. is our recommendation that African-American tudents in the _iRSD organise an effort that sets forth as its primary goal t _ U. .... _ ______-T^ .   . , raise the awareness of LRSD students impact the present and future qua! RSD by gaining a knowledge and u regarding their opportun ity of education in the Ian's obligations and derstanding : the Deseg. attending Magnet. 'mmitments to African-American Studer. t is cur leaaers. ncent ve and .-.rea senooxs.  recommendation that African-American community business leaders, parents and students designate a team \" from the community that is committed to representing t' academic and social interests of .African-American children in discussions regarding proposed amendments to the LRSD ne Desegregation Plan. Furthermore, it is recommended that this team\" establish a view independent of the present litigative parties. - 11 --t 13 cur Tommittee. rsccrjnenaar aciaiiscs mesc can-.iM can aemoers cf 4.ae racc-?inqing .\nea^ rUDi thv temcers r arents aarePxrs. sruaents and education cm or ne Eeseg. Flan, Acnanae oreparec regarding 13 -Icck .Alliance F choois to have a be grateful to ha^e :e ?rc?c3ed aiaendMntST^to.'^je parties to the Plan at this ract-Finding Committee. , _____ patron from ail present litigatirB- 'idea' UEMQaid exchange. We reconoend that a required course in- \"Conflict Resolutim^\nTraining and Skills Ewvelopment\" be offered to secondary LRST* students . primary\nThis recoaaaondation is consisJbsntMrith LRSD's Strategic Plan, strategy 10. recommend that commuity members take effect in t' can-.^erccan cerine \u0026gt;A aa: ears or .san Webber iir 'in paren udents and e strategy nat The Fact-F It Working For .Afri  strategies j that should aur recommendations fall on the ieadershi an' deral Judge o nding Committee For The hs. .hafeeza Ma.jeed. an-.American Y / lesegregation flan - iS Fnairperson .--.cwara 7^7 lusinessman date .'Ir. .^ark Cole, Student ,-,ep. -ph jlMl'.-i, ignature cate _arry ttaggers. rarent 31 mature cate Atta-: '.ents r.yicurtis naix. Businessman ignature date \"ATTACHMENTS\"The Fact-Finding Committee for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It (Ln. Working For African-American Youth? Mr. Curtis Hall Mr. Howard Love Ms. Hafeeza Majeed Rev. Larry Staggers Mr. Dale Charles B December 1, 1996 B ia H RECEIVrr* The Honorable Judge Susan Webber Wright United States District Court Eastern And Western Districts of Arkansas 600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 302 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3325 OfC 4 J99g Office of Desegregaiion Moniioring Dear Judge Wright: Thank you for your letter dated November 8, 1996, in which you expressed your appreciation for The Fact-Finding Committees interest in the implementation and monitoring of the LRSD Desegregation Plan. Additionally, we are pleased that you have placed our report in the file of the LRSD Desegregation Case. It is also encouraging to African-Arne ri can parents and students in the LRSD for your office to forward a copy of our letter to you dated November 7, 1996 and a copy of our report to the parties in the case, making them aware of the Committee s interest in participating in any process for amending the Desegregation Plan. Judge Wright, we are taking this opportunity to make you aware that we are seriously concerned that Superintendent Roberts, members of the LRSD Board of Directors and Attorney John Walker have indicated to African- American parents and students in this District that they are unwilling to seek or accept our participation in any process for amending the Desegregation Plan. We justify our conclusion with the attached article from the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, dated November 29, 1996. The members of The Fact-Finding Committee learned about the Superintendents proposed recommendations and the Boards unanimous vote to approve the newspaper article. Superintendents proposals through the attached Therefore, Judge Wright, our Committee and African- the LRSD have unanimously agreed to the American parents and students in following\n1. We respectfully request that you deny any motion by Superintendent Roberts and the LRSD Board to seek a break of up to nine months from requirements of court-monitored desegregation. Please be Friday, December 6, 1996, members of The Fact- Finding Committee and African-American parents will hand-deliver and the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, our written advised that on to your office justification for requesting your proposal. denial of the Superintendents 2. The Fact-Finding Committee has scheduled live air time on radio to African-American parents and students regarding the inform Amencan anu biuucmo .cya.Mu.a blatant disrespect of our community by Superintendent Roberts, the LRSD Board of Directors and Attorney John Walker. We thank you for your efforts to show your respect for the concerns of the We intend to continue to make the parties African-American community. aware of our interest and we certainly intend to participate in this process, at every level. Thank you so much for your time. Majeed, Chaifpersor/ cc\nSuperintendent Don Roberts Attorney John W. Walker FileUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT eastern and western districts of ARKANSAS 600 WEST CAPITOL AVENUE, SUITE 302 little ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-3325 SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT JUDGE November 8, 1996 Hafeeza B. Majeed, Chairperson The Fact-Finding Committee 2603 S. Brown Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72204 Dear Ms. Majeed: This is in response to your letter of November 8, 1996, in which you enclosed a copy of the report of The,Fact-Finding^Committee you enclosed a t for the LRSD Desegregation Plan - Is It Working for African- American Youth? I am always happy to hear of parents' i_ nteres_ t in the, ir and I appreciate the Committee's interest in children's schools the implementation and monitoring of the LRSD Desegregation Plan. Your letter and report will be placed in the file of the Little Rock School Desegregation case. I am also sending a copy of your letter and report to the parties in case because I want them to of the Committee's interest in participating in any be aware process for amending the desegregation plan. . sr ^2^ Ms. Thank you again for expressing your inter\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"loc_rosaparks_49359","title":"[Framed portrait of Mary McLeod Bethune, presented to Rosa Parks by the National Council of Negro Woman, 1996] [graphic].","collection_id":"loc_rosaparks","collection_title":"Rosa Parks Papers","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1996"],"dcterms_description":["Title devised by Library staff.","\"To Rosa Parks, B-CC, NCNW, 1996\"--gold engraved inscription on frame."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":null,"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":null,"dcterms_title":["[Framed portrait of Mary McLeod Bethune, presented to Rosa Parks by the National Council of Negro Woman, 1996] [graphic]."],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Library of Congress"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.49359"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Please contact holding institution for information regarding use and copyright status."],"dcterms_medium":["photographic prints1990-2000.gmgpc","portrait photographs1990-2000.gmgpc"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Bethune, Mary McLeod, 1875-1955"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null}],"pages":{"current_page":460,"next_page":461,"prev_page":459,"total_pages":6797,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":5508,"total_count":81557,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"educator_resource_mediums_sms","items":[{"value":"lesson plans","hits":319},{"value":"teaching guides","hits":53},{"value":"timelines (chronologies)","hits":43},{"value":"online exhibitions","hits":38},{"value":"bibliographies","hits":15},{"value":"study guides","hits":11},{"value":"annotated bibliographies","hits":9},{"value":"learning modules","hits":6},{"value":"worksheets","hits":6},{"value":"slide shows","hits":4},{"value":"quizzes","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":40428},{"value":"StillImage","hits":35298},{"value":"MovingImage","hits":4529},{"value":"Sound","hits":3226},{"value":"Collection","hits":41},{"value":"InteractiveResource","hits":25}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"Peppler, Jim","hits":4965},{"value":"Phay, John E.","hits":4712},{"value":"University of Mississippi. Bureau of Educational Research","hits":4707},{"value":"Baldowski, Clifford H., 1917-1999","hits":2599},{"value":"Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission","hits":2255},{"value":"Thurmond, Strom, 1902-2003","hits":2077},{"value":"WSB-TV (Television station : Atlanta, Ga.)","hits":1475},{"value":"Newman, I. DeQuincey (Isaiah DeQuincey), 1911-1985","hits":1003},{"value":"The State Media Company (Columbia, S.C.)","hits":926},{"value":"Atlanta Journal-Constitution","hits":844},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":778}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"African Americans--Civil rights","hits":9445},{"value":"Civil rights","hits":8328},{"value":"African Americans","hits":5912},{"value":"Mississippi--Race relations","hits":5750},{"value":"Race relations","hits":5604},{"value":"Education, Secondary","hits":5083},{"value":"Education, Elementary","hits":4729},{"value":"Segregation in education--Mississippi","hits":4727},{"value":"Education--Pictorial works","hits":4707},{"value":"Civil rights demonstrations","hits":4440},{"value":"Civil rights workers","hits":3536}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966--Correspondence","hits":1888},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1815},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1709},{"value":"Baker, Augusta, 1911-1998","hits":1495},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1312},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1071},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":858},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":814},{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":719},{"value":"Mizell, M. Hayes","hits":674},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":626}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"name_authoritative_sms","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":2598},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1915},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1704},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1331},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1070},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":856},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":806},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":625},{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":605},{"value":"Snelling, Paula","hits":580},{"value":"Williams, Hosea, 1926-2000","hits":440}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Nobel Prize","hits":1769},{"value":"Ole Miss Integration","hits":1670},{"value":"Housing Act of 1961","hits":969},{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":853},{"value":"Memphis Sanitation Workers Strike","hits":366},{"value":"Selma-Montgomery March","hits":337},{"value":"Freedom Summer","hits":306},{"value":"Freedom Rides","hits":214},{"value":"Poor People's Campaign","hits":180},{"value":"University of Georgia Integration","hits":173},{"value":"University of Alabama Integration","hits":140}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":17987},{"value":"United States, Georgia, Fulton County, Atlanta, 33.749, -84.38798","hits":5437},{"value":"United States, Alabama, Montgomery County, Montgomery, 32.36681, -86.29997","hits":5151},{"value":"United States, Georgia, 32.75042, -83.50018","hits":4847},{"value":"United States, South Carolina, 34.00043, -81.00009","hits":4599},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":4328},{"value":"United States, Alabama, 32.75041, -86.75026","hits":3948},{"value":"United States, Mississippi, 32.75041, -89.75036","hits":2910},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":2580},{"value":"United States, Tennessee, Shelby County, Memphis, 35.14953, -90.04898","hits":2580},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":2536}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Georgia","hits":12823},{"value":"Alabama","hits":11313},{"value":"Mississippi","hits":10220},{"value":"South Carolina","hits":8493},{"value":"Arkansas","hits":4733},{"value":"Texas","hits":4399},{"value":"Tennessee","hits":3786},{"value":"Florida","hits":2602},{"value":"Ohio","hits":2403},{"value":"North Carolina","hits":1875},{"value":"New York","hits":1840}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1966","hits":10632},{"value":"1963","hits":10287},{"value":"1965","hits":10218},{"value":"1956","hits":9840},{"value":"1955","hits":9619},{"value":"1964","hits":9365},{"value":"1968","hits":9345},{"value":"1962","hits":9247},{"value":"1967","hits":8897},{"value":"1957","hits":8523},{"value":"1961","hits":8282},{"value":"1958","hits":8259},{"value":"1959","hits":8061},{"value":"1960","hits":7948},{"value":"1969","hits":7348},{"value":"1954","hits":7240},{"value":"1950","hits":7118},{"value":"1953","hits":6969},{"value":"1970","hits":6835},{"value":"1971","hits":6425},{"value":"1977","hits":6367},{"value":"1972","hits":6254},{"value":"1952","hits":6162},{"value":"1951","hits":6046},{"value":"1975","hits":5894},{"value":"1976","hits":5863},{"value":"1974","hits":5849},{"value":"1973","hits":5689},{"value":"1979","hits":5416},{"value":"1978","hits":5405},{"value":"1980","hits":5366},{"value":"1995","hits":4885},{"value":"1981","hits":4811},{"value":"1994","hits":4704},{"value":"1948","hits":4597},{"value":"1949","hits":4573},{"value":"1996","hits":4542},{"value":"1982","hits":4417},{"value":"1947","hits":4317},{"value":"1985","hits":4313},{"value":"1998","hits":4281},{"value":"1983","hits":4261},{"value":"1997","hits":4258},{"value":"1984","hits":4152},{"value":"1999","hits":4074},{"value":"1946","hits":4047},{"value":"1945","hits":4018},{"value":"1986","hits":4006},{"value":"1990","hits":3988},{"value":"1943","hits":3900},{"value":"1944","hits":3896},{"value":"2000","hits":3894},{"value":"2001","hits":3876},{"value":"1942","hits":3868},{"value":"1940","hits":3765},{"value":"1941","hits":3758},{"value":"1987","hits":3744},{"value":"2002","hits":3624},{"value":"1991","hits":3553},{"value":"1936","hits":3507},{"value":"1939","hits":3501},{"value":"1992","hits":3500},{"value":"2003","hits":3489},{"value":"1993","hits":3478},{"value":"1938","hits":3466},{"value":"1937","hits":3450},{"value":"1989","hits":3441},{"value":"1930","hits":3378},{"value":"1988","hits":3355},{"value":"1935","hits":3307},{"value":"1933","hits":3271},{"value":"1934","hits":3271},{"value":"1932","hits":3255},{"value":"1931","hits":3240},{"value":"2005","hits":3143},{"value":"2004","hits":2995},{"value":"2006","hits":2860},{"value":"1929","hits":2790},{"value":"1928","hits":2272},{"value":"1921","hits":2124},{"value":"1925","hits":2040},{"value":"1927","hits":2026},{"value":"1924","hits":2012},{"value":"2016","hits":2011},{"value":"1926","hits":2010},{"value":"1920","hits":1976},{"value":"1923","hits":1955},{"value":"1922","hits":1929},{"value":"2007","hits":1715},{"value":"2008","hits":1664},{"value":"2011","hits":1661},{"value":"2009","hits":1624},{"value":"2019","hits":1623},{"value":"2015","hits":1613},{"value":"2013","hits":1604},{"value":"2010","hits":1601},{"value":"2014","hits":1567},{"value":"2012","hits":1553},{"value":"1919","hits":1533},{"value":"1918","hits":1531}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"0193","max":"2035","count":506439,"missing":56},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"photographs","hits":10710},{"value":"correspondence","hits":9628},{"value":"black-and-white photographs","hits":7678},{"value":"negatives (photographs)","hits":7513},{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":4462},{"value":"letters (correspondence)","hits":3623},{"value":"oral histories (literary works)","hits":3607},{"value":"black-and-white negatives","hits":2771},{"value":"editorial cartoons","hits":2620},{"value":"newspapers","hits":1955},{"value":"manuscripts (documents)","hits":1692}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/","hits":41201},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":17721},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/UND/1.0/","hits":8830},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/","hits":7090},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/","hits":2186},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/","hits":1778},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-CR/1.0/","hits":1115},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","hits":145},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/","hits":60},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-RUU/1.0/","hits":51},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","hits":27}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Jim Peppler Southern Courier Photograph Collection","hits":4956},{"value":"John E. Phay Collection ","hits":4706},{"value":"John J. Herrera Papers","hits":3288},{"value":"Baldy Editorial Cartoons, 1946-1982, 1997: Clifford H. Baldowski Editorial Cartoons at the Richard B. Russell Library.","hits":2607},{"value":"Sovereignty Commission Online","hits":2335},{"value":"Strom Thurmond Collection, Mss 100","hits":2068},{"value":"Alabama Media Group Collection","hits":2067},{"value":"Black Trailblazers, Leaders, Activists, and Intellectuals in Cleveland","hits":2033},{"value":"Rosa Parks Papers","hits":1948},{"value":"Isaiah DeQuincey Newman, (1911-1985), Papers, 1929-2003","hits":1904},{"value":"Lillian Eugenia Smith Papers (circa 1920-1980)","hits":1887}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"John Davis Williams Library. Department of Archives and Special Collections","hits":8885},{"value":"Alabama. Department of Archives and History","hits":8153},{"value":"South Caroliniana Library","hits":4251},{"value":"Atlanta University Center Robert W. Woodruff Library","hits":4102},{"value":"University of North Texas. Libraries","hits":3854},{"value":"University of South Carolina. Libraries","hits":3438},{"value":"Hargrett Library","hits":3292},{"value":"Richard B. Russell Library for Political Research and Studies","hits":2874},{"value":"Mississippi. Department of Archives and History","hits":2825},{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":2785},{"value":"Rhodes College","hits":2264}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":81102},{"value":"Collection","hits":455}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":81360},{"value":"true","hits":197}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}