{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1323","title":"Proceedings: ''Motion to Consider Teachers' Strike''","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1996-08-28"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Education--Arkansas","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School employees","School management and organization","Teachers","Court records","Employee rights"],"dcterms_title":["Proceedings: ''Motion to Consider Teachers' Strike''"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1323"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["legal documents"],"dcterms_extent":["198 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1654","title":"Court Filings concerning ADE's motion to dismiss, PCSSD's motions regarding the minimum teacher salary law and the court's orders, planning and budgeting plans, and LRSD's motion to end federal court jurisdiction","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit"],"dc_date":["1996-08-22/1996-08-30"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Joshua Intervenors","Arkansas. Department of Education","Special districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Little Rock School District","Knight Intervenors","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School management and organization","School integration","School improvement programs","Teachers--Salaries, etc.","Teachers","Court records"],"dcterms_title":["Court Filings concerning ADE's motion to dismiss, PCSSD's motions regarding the minimum teacher salary law and the court's orders, planning and budgeting plans, and LRSD's motion to end federal court jurisdiction"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1654"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["54 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"Court of Appeals, response to motion to extend time by Joshua intervenors; District Court, response to Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) motion to dismiss; District Court, response to Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to abstain; District Court, response to separate school districts' motion to intervene; District Court, Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) reply to the Knight intervenors' responses to the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) motions regarding the minimum teacher salary law and the court's orders of June 15, 1993, and July 14, 1993; District Court, order; District Court, notice of appeal; District Court, order; District Court, Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) motion seeking equitable relief; District Court, Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) brief in support of its motion seeking equitable relief; District Court, intervening school districts' reply to the response of Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) and Little Rock School District (LRSD) to motion for intervention; District Court, memorandum brief in support of intervening school districts' reply to the response of Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) and Little Rock School District (LRSD) to motion for intervention; District Court, second supplemental affidavit of Joy C. Springer; District Court, supplemental brief; Court of Appeals, summary of argument, Servicemaster Management Services L.P.; District Court, notice of filing, Little Rock School District (LRSD) August 1996 program planning and budgeting process and Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) August program planning and budgeting tool for FY 1996-97 and FY 1997-98; District Court, Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) reply to Joshua's response to Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) motion to end federal court jurisdiction; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool; District Court, portion of transcript  The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  !  AUG 2 6 1996 Office f\u003ef D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS asegregauon Mon1tormg FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ......_ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. NO. 96-047EALR SERVICEMASTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES L.P. APPELLANT APPELLEE RESPONSE TO MOTION TO EXTEND TIME BY JOSHUA INTERVENORS ServiceMaster Management Services L.P. (\"ServiceMaster\"), for its response to the motion to extend time made by the Joshua Intervenors (\"Joshua\") states: 1. Joshua requested in a letter filed with the Court dated August 21, 1996, that it be heard with respect to \"argument one\" of the Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") Brief as an appellee and that it be heard with respect to \"argument two\" of the LRSD Brief, which involves ServiceMaster, as an appellant. 2. Subject to the positions taken hereinbelow, ServiceMaster has no objection to Joshua's request that it be heard as an appellee only with respect to argument one of the LRSD Brief and to any extension of time granted to Joshua for that purpose. However, ServiceMaster hereby objects to Joshua's request that it be heard as an appellant with respect to argument two of the LRSD Brief. 3. Joshua was served a copy of the District Court's Order dated March 11, 1995, which was appropriately styled and was in no way misleading~ Joshua knowingly failed to file an appeal of its own accord with respect the District Court's Order concerning argument two, the ServiceMaster issue, as prescribed by the Rules of Appellate Procedure. In addition, this appeal is not and cannot be characterized as a cross-appeal. 4. The status of Joshua in this appeal filed by the LRSD can only be as an appellee with respect to the argument one presented by the LRSD. WHEREFORE, ServiceMaster requests that any order granting Joshua's request to file a brief in this case be qualified and limited to allow Joshua as an appellee only and that Joshua not be allowed to argue or make references to ServiceMaster and argument two presented by the LRSD in its appellee's brief or in oral argument. Respectfully submitted, Joseph S. Mowery Giroir \u0026 Gregory, Professional Association 111 Center Street, Suite 1900 Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 372-3000 and John C. Everett Everett, Shemin, Mars \u0026 Stills P.O. Box 1646 Fayetteville, AR 72202 (501) 443-0292 Attorneys for Appellee ServiceMaster Management Services L.P. \"\" ' , ... CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Response to the Motion to Extend Time has been served on the following people by depositing a copy of the same in the United States mail on this 23rd day _of August 1996. Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. John W. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. 17223 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Travis Creed Roachell Law Firm 401 West Capital, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026 Jones, P.A. 3400 TCBY Bldg. Capitol \u0026 Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Sam Jones Wright, Lindsey \u0026 Jennings 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Elizabeth Boyter Arkansas Dept. of Education 4 State Capital Mall Little Rock, AR 72201 624/RESP JOSH.823 FILED  U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT AUG 2 3 1996 EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JAMES W McCORMACK, CLERK WESTERN DIVISION B y: DEP. CLERK NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF vs. NO . LR--C - 8 2 - 8 6 6 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. LORENE JOSHUA, et al. KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al. DEFENDANTS AUG 2 o 1996 IlITERVENORS Office of Desegregation Moniton~VENORS RESPONSE TO ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS Comes now North Little Rock School District (\"NLRSD\"), by and through its attorneys, Jack, Lyon \u0026 Jones, P.A., and for its Response to the Arkansas Department of Education's Motion to Dismiss, states as follows: 1. On or about July 23, 1996, the Arkansas Department of Education filed a Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Abstention. 2. Subsequently, the Pulaski County Special School District (\"PCSSD\") filed Responses to the Department of Education's Motion to Dismiss. 3. Upon careful review of the PCSSD' s Responses, and in order to promote economy and avoid burdening the Court with repetitious filings, NLRSD joins in and adopts the motions and corresponding memoranda referenced in paragraph No. 2. WHEREFORE, based upon the foregoing, NLRSD respectfully requests this Court: (a) Dismiss the Arkansas Department of Education's Motion to C, Dismiss; (b) Award NLRSD its costs and attorneys fees; (c) Award .NLRSD all other relief to which it may be entitled. Respectfully Submitted, JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES, P.A. 3400 TCBY Tower 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 375-1122 By, s~~Caa, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have this 23rd day of August, 1996 served one copy of the foregoing via United States mail to the following: Christopher J. Heller, Esq. FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026 CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 M. Samuel Jones, Esquire WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 200 West Capitol Avenue 2200 Worthen Bank Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 John W. Walker, Esquire JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 Ann Brown OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Richard W. Roachell, Esq. ROACHELL AND STREETT First Federal Plaza 410 W. Capitol Avenue, Ste. 504 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Timothy G. Gauger Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, AR 72201 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF v. LR-C-82-866 RECEJl/~~ PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL AUG 2 B 1996 DEFENDANTS Office Of Desegr . INTERVENORS _ esation Monitoring  - ~- - - INTERVENORS .RESPONSE TO ARKAN~AS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO ABSTAIN For its response, the Little Rock School District (LRSD) states: LRSD adopts Pulaski County Special School District's response to ADE's motion. Respectfully submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026 CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Street Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 By:~ cw~: :::~ Bar No. 81083 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Response to Arkansas Department of Education's Motion Dismiss Or, In The Alternative To Abstain has been served on the following by depositing copy of same in the United States mail on this 23rd day of August, 1996. Mr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway - Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES, P.A. 3400 TCBY Tower 425 Capitol Avenue Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell Law Firm 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown - HAND DELIVERED Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Timothy G. Gauger Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. William P. Thompson Mr. James M. Llewellyn, Jr. Thompson \u0026 Llewellyn, P.A. 412 South 18th Street P.O. Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 2 \\ FILED. U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS AUG 2 3 1996 WESTERN DIVISION NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT vs. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. NO. LR-C-82-866 AUG t o 1996 JAMES W McCORMACK, CLERK By: ------,0::-::E\"\"P.--:aC\"\"\"LE=-==R=K PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS LORENE JOSHUA, et al. KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al. Office of Desegre9allcn Momtorm~ INTERVENORS INTERVENORS -  ~- -  RESPONSE TO SEPARATE SCHOOL DISTRICTS' MOTION TO INTERVENE Comes now the North Little Rock School District ( 11NLRSD 11 ), by and through its attorneys, Jack, Lyon \u0026 Jones, P.A., and for its Response to Separate School District's Motion to Intervene and Answer, states as follows: 1. On or about July 23, 1996, a number of Arkansas school districts filed a Motion to Intervene and an Answer in the above referenced matter. 2. The Pulaski County Special School District ( \"PCSSD\") filed Responses to such Motion and Answer on or about August 2, 1996. 3 . Upon careful review of the PCSSD' s Response, and in order to promote economy and avoid burdening the Court with repetitious filings, NLRSD joins in and adopts the motions and corresponding memoranda referenced in paragraph No. 2. WHEREFORE, based upon the foregoing, NLRSD respectfully requests this Court: (a) Award the relief sought by the PCSSD; (b) Award NLRSD its costs and attorneys fees; (c) Award NLRSD all other relief to which it may be entitled. By: Respectfully Submitted, JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES, P.A. 3400 TCBY Tower 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 375-1122 )iii:~Jo~ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have this 23rd day of August, 1996 served one copy of the foregoing via United States mail to the following: Christopher J. Heller, Esq. FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026 CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 M. Samuel Jones, Esquire WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 200 West Capitol Avenue 2200 Worthen Bank Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 John W. Walker, Esquire JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206 Ann Brown OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Richard W. Roachell, Esq. ROACHELL AND STREETT First Federal Plaza 410 W. Capitol Avenue, Ste. 504 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Timothy G. Gauger Assistant .Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, AR 72201 Stepnen w. Jon~ AUG 2 3 1996 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of Dasagregilllon Munitonn~ ----PLAINTIFF -...- .,  v. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. PCSSD REPLY TO THE KNIGHT INTERVENORS' RESPONSES TO THE PCSSD MOTIONS REGARDING THE MINIMUM TEACHER SALARY LAW AND DEFENDANTS INT ERVEN ORS INT ERVEN ORS THE COURT'S ORDERS OF JUNE 15, 1993 AND JULY 14, 1993 The Pulaski County Special School District {\"PCSSD\") for its reply states: 1. The negotiated agreement between the Pulaski Association of Classroom Teachers (\"PACT\") and the PCSSD explicitly recognizes that any savings generated by the early retirement incentive program are to be used to reestablish the District reserves. 2. Compliance by the District at this point in time with the new minimum salary law will interfere with the PCSSD's ability to desegregate since it cannot now reasonably project sufficient funds to justify compliance and PACT has not, and cannot reasonably project such funds 3. The PCSSD incorporates by reference its motion for equitable relief and brief in support filed August 27, 1996 in further support of this reply. Respectfully submitted: WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 200 West Capitol Avenue Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3699 (501) 371-0808 By~ M. mue (76060) At~orneys for 1 Pulaski county Sp~School District CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On August ;'1 7 ,7- , 1996, a copy of the foregoing was served by U.S. mail on the following. Mr. John W. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 2000 First Commercial Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Ms. Ann Brown ODM Heritage West Bldg., Ste. 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas . 72201 Mr. Richard W. Roachell Roachell and Street First Federal Plaza 410 W. Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Timothy Gauger Assistant Attorney General 323 Center street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr~7Jones~ \\ _______/ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT vs. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 1, ET AL ~ f\\ECENEO liUG 2 9 1996~ AUG 2 7 1996 PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL SERVICEMASTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES, A Limited Partnership INTERVENORS . I oeseNegation Mon~o1111~ Olhce o ,., _.. ...- I.NTERVENORS ORDER Before the Court is the motion of the Little Rock School District (LRSD) to release previously reserved four-year-old program seats throughout the distric~ and kindergarten seats in the incentive schools (doc.#2729]. The Court previously issued oral approval of the motion and follows with this Order. The LRSD states that it engaged in vigorous recruitment efforts during the 1995-96 school year and that, while those efforts yielded positive results, seats still remain vacant in the LRSD's four-year-old classes and also in the kindergarten level in the incentive schools. The c~urt has repeatedly been reluctant to condone releasing seats reserved for white children because relinquishing those seats makes it more difficult for the district to desegregate the schools, especially the incentive schools. In previous orders granting the LRSD's request to assign black students to seats set 2 7 8 ~ aside for white students, 1 the Court has noted that it is not - satisfied that the district has engaged in timely, vigorous, and sustained recruitment which is targeted at filling the reserved seats. Again this year, the LRSD's recruitment record does not convince the Court that the district has been significantly more energetic or diligent in recruiting students. Further, the Court has previously observed that the district has repeatedly filled incentive school kindergarten seats in proportions that are outside the guidelines, indicating that the district had either already released seats to black children or never reserved them for whites in the first place. Such is the case again this year. Despite these recurrent problems, the Court is mindful that another major goal of the early childhood programs, in addition to racial integration, is to promote the academic achievement of black students. The desegregation plan provides that vacant seats reserved for white children will not remain unfilled. (LRSD Desegregation Plan, pg; 140.) The Court notes that the LRSD has pledged, in its motion, to continue \"vigorous recruitment efforts\" and also to determine what adjustments are necessary and appropriate to ensure that the effect of releasing the seats is minimized on future year enrollments. The Court encourages the parties to consider amending the district's racial balance goals in the plan so _that the district will have more flexibility in filling these seats. More realistic goals, together with vigorous 1 See Orders of September 7, 1994 and Seplemb~r 7, 1995. -2- recruitmentr could assist the LRSD in meeting its desegregation obligations. 2 .., 7/J1.__ IT IS SO ORDERED this._ day of August 1996. -UNITED ST.Z TES DISTR.i,cT JUDGE rHIS DOCUMENT t:NTERED ON DOCKET SHEET IN : C.,MPLIANCE WITH RULE 58 AND10R 79(a) FRCP )N ?J ~ '3' /'J~ BY k7t:: ;c;::::: 2 The Court refers the parties to the testimony of Dr. David J. Armor, who t.:stilied dunng May 1996 with respect to his studies and conclusions regarding achievement disparity and student assignm.:nt. -3- IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ' v. LR-C-82-866 RECEfVED PLAINTIFF AUG 2 8 1996 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL Office of Desegregation Monitiffi..ENDANTS INT ERVEN ORS INTERVENORS NOTICE OF APPEAL The Little Rock School District hereby gives notice of its appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit from the district court Order of July 3 O, 19 9 6 by which the district court interpreted the \"pooling\" provision of the Settlement Agreement to require that LRSD pay PCSSD $345,294. Respectfully submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL- DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026 CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 (50~~ BY:~ Bar No. 81083 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Notice of Appeal has been served on the following counsel of record by depositing copy of same in the United States mail on this 27th day of August, 1996: ~r. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026 Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell ROACHELL LAW FIRM 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown - HAND DELIVERED Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Timothy G. Gauger Office of Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, AR 72201 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT vs. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL SERVICEMASTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES, A Limited Partnership ORDER i1UG 2 7 1996 PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS Upon motion of the Little Rock School District, the time within which it must file its application for attorneys' fees with respect to this Court's January 13, 1995 decision and the May 15, 1996 decision of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals is hereby extended to and including August 30, 1996. IT IS SO ORDERED this )- ... ?\" 1\\ day of August 1996. 2782 MAR 2 7 1997 li1L.::U OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MOrmORING U.S. DISTRICT COUAT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR~\u003c;TERNOISTRIC'tARKANSAS EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS AUG 2 7 1996 WESTERN DMSION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. JAMES W. MCI.UK1v1~1.,K, 1.:LERK By: -----,,.pm.~-. l\"\"lf....,.,F DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS PCSSD MOTION SEEKING EQUITABLE RELIEF The Pulaski County Special School District (\"PCSSD\") for its motion states: 1. The teachers in the PCSSD are on strike. 2. As a result of this unilateral action by a party to this case, the PCSSD cannot deliver the educational services and desegregation programs outlined in the Desegregation Plan and by orders of this Court. 3. As more fully set forth in the accompanying memorandum, this Court should order striking teachers to return to work in the PCSSD because their unilateral action precludes the PCSSD from performing its constitutionally mandated role as a desegregating school district, because the issues which underpin the strike are already before this Court, because this Court already has a mediator in place, because the strike is inconsistent with the negotiated agreement between the parties, and because PACT has a remedy at law to allege breach of contract or specific performance of the agreement. 4. This Court possesses broad equitable powers to take all reasonable acts and to fashion all reasonable orders necessary to accomplish the remedial goals of the Desegregation Plans. WHEREFORE, the PCSSD prays for an order of this Court directing that PACT end its strike, that the PCSSD teachers return to work pending resolution of the issues already before this Court, and, as appropriate, for a reference to the United States Department of Justice Community Conciliation Service and for all proper relief. Respectfully submitted: WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 200 West Capitol Avenue Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3699 (501) 371-0808 By __ ...,,c...-.i.:----~-====-----M. S Atto Dis Special School CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On August n._, 1996, a copy of the foregoing was served by U.S. mail on the following. Mr. John W. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 2000 First Commercial Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Ms. Ann Brown ODM Heritage West Bldg., Ste. 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Richard W. Roachell Roachell and Street First Federal Plaza 410 W. Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Timothy Gauger Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 3 ' r :~ .. . -  RECEniED U.S. DISTRICT COURT MAR 2 7 1997 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT cc:MR'flNo,srn,cTARKANsAs 0:=FICE OF DESEGREGATIOi'J MONITORING EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS AUG 2 7 1996 WESTERN DMSION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KA THERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. JAMES W. MCliUliMAliK, CLERK 3y: PLiUm'IFF DEP C'.. : DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTER VEN ORS PCSSD BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION SEEKING EQUITABLE RELIEF Introduction The teachers in the PCSSD are on strike. As a result of their unilateral action, the - PCSSD cannot operate its schools as required to deliver the education and desegregation services envisioned by the desegregation plan and the orders of this Court. The Pulaski Association of Classroom Teachers (\"PACT\") is a party before this Court. It has been since July, 31, 1984. Procedural History On July 31, 1984, the Knight Intervenors, which specifically include the PACT, filed their complaint in intervention in this case. Paragraph 1 of the complaint in intervention states that: Intervenors intervene for the purpose of requesting that the Court order the protection of their rights to bargain and the rights they have bargained, pursuant to the agreements and policies between Intervenors and their respective districts. The District Court's order granting intervention followed an order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit directing that the intervention be granted. The concluding paragraph of the opinion of the Court of Appeals, dated July 6, 1984, states in pertinent part that: The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to the district court with instructions to grant the appellants' motion for leave to intervene as parties in the remedy phase of this case. Their intervention shall be for the purpose of litigating the issues raised in their complaint, the protection of their existing contractual rights and their right to bargain collectively. Thus, as parties to the remedial phase of this litigation, PACT is decidedly subject to the remedial orders of this Court as is any other party. The Applicable Law The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued its decision approving the Settlement Agreement and Settlement Plan in 1990. In that decision, it also outlined the rules for implementation. 921 F.2d 1371 (8th Cir. 1990). The Court of Appeals delivered both broad responsibilities as well as a broad charter and grant of authority to the District Court in respect of the Settlement Agreement and the Plans. As it held at page 1394: 8. The District Court is instructed to monitor closely the compliance of the parties with the settlement plans and the settlement agreement, to take whatever action is appropriate, in its discretion, to ensure compliance with the plans and the agreement, and otherwise to proceed as the law and the facts require. In its subsequent decision, reported at 949 F.2d 253, the Court of Appeals evaluated the status of changes to the desegregation plans proposed by the parties but rejected by the District Court. In a passage often quoted by the District Court since then, the Court of Appeals held that: It may be helpful for us to state those elements of the 1989 Plan that we consider crucial, and with respect to which no retreat should be approved. They are as follows ... (3) operation of the agreed number of interdistrict schools acco~ding to the agreed timetable; ( 4) intradistrict desegregation of PCSSD according to the agreed timetable; 949 F.2d 253 at 255. The Issues Underpinning the Ongoing Strike Are Alread,y Before This Court On May 22, 1996, this Court delivered a letter to the parties in this case informing them that Mr. Gus Taylor, Chief Conciliator for the United States Department of Justice Community Conciliation Service, was being made available to the parties. As the Court directed: There are a number of disputes among these parties in which your services might be of great value. I will not attempt to list them for you now. By sending you this letter I am inviting you and the attorneys for the parties to contact each other. Mr. Taylor's services to the parties, which have been rendered on several occasions in the past in this case, are free of charge. On August 5, 1996, the PCSSD filed and served its amendment and supplement to second motion to enforce the settlement agreement with the State. Among the issues advanced by the PCSSD in that filing is the proposition that the State's new minimum salary law violates that provision of the Settlement Agreement which prohibits the enactment of any legislation which substantially interferes with the ability of the PCSSD to desegregate. On August 19, 1996 -- ironically the day the strike began -- the Knight Intervenors, including PACT, filed a response denying that the new minimum salary law substantially interferes with the ability of the PCSSD to desegregate and that the minimum salary law did 3 not violate any provision of the Settlement Agreement. Indeed, PACT affirmatively requested the federal court to find that the minimum salary law should be enforced in all respects including those issues raised in PCSSD's motion to clarify the Court's orders of June 15, 1993 and July 14, 1993 and to grant to them \"all relief to which they may be entitled\". The referenced PCSSD motion, as it relates to the Court's orders of June 15, 1993 and July 14, 1993, deals with the issue whether the \"savings\" realized by the PCSSD from the previous refunding of its bonded indebtedness and the savings generated from its early retirement program are or should be available to the District to fund teacher raises this year. PACT has contended from the outset of the strike that the District should use its contingency fund, a fund generated by the savings realized by the refinancing of the debt and the early - retirement program, to fund raises to comply with the minimum salary law. In their memorandum also dated August 19, 1996, PACT contends that the Court should clarify its June and July, 1993 orders to declare that: \"The savings may, in the discretion of the District, be used to increase teachers' salaries.\" Accordingly, the two central issues around which the strike seems to revolve are already before the District Court and the issues have been joined between the parties. Further, the District Court has already placed a mediator in place to resolve the disputes that may exist or may arise between and among the parties. In sum, PACT specifically intervened in the federal court action with regard to its negotiated agreement and it is respectfully submitted that all strike issues should be resolved by the District Court, particularly given the resources the Court possesses through the Office 4 of Desegregation Monitoring to evaluate any budget and revenue claims that may be advanced by either of the parties. The Negotiated Agreement Is Inconsistent With The Present Strike As a preliminary matter, it should be observed that Section 8, Item C of the negotiated agreement between the Board of Directors of the PCSSD and the PACT provides: \"The parties agree that state and federal statutes and court orders are incorporated into this Agreement.\" (emphasis added). Accordingly, the parties explicitly recognize as part of their negotiations and agreement that the orders of this Court would be part of and control. The PCSSD declared impasse no later than August 26, 1996. Section 12 of the negotiated agreement sets forth the \"impasse resolution procedure\". It is clear from the structure of the impasse procedure -- which begins with mediation, continues with fact finding and ultimately places authority for a final decision with the Board -- that the agreement contemplates that all parties are working and that no job action is occurring when impasse is declared. Among other reasons, the status quo between the parties should be restored so that the impasse procedure can proceed in normal fashion which requires that the teachers return to work. Further, Article VI, Section 2A of the Agreement provides that: The Association agrees that the Board shall have the right to establish the work year and annual school calendar. Thereafter, certain provisions and conditions associated with establishing the calendar are set forth including days when school can be held and days when it cannot. Singularly absent 5 from the Agreement is any term which would support the proposition that the teachers are entitled to interrupt or change the work calendar by striking, when they explicitly recognize that the Board shall establish the working days. The teachers' publicly espoused position that raises can be funded from savings generated by the early retirement incentive program are specifically refuted by Article IX, Section 8 of the Agreement which explicitly recognizes that: The purpose of the early Retirement Incentive Program is to reduce District expenditures in order to build a reserve which will off set the cessation of State Desegregation Settlement Funds in 1995-96 and 1996- 97. As previously observed, this issue is presently and squarely before this Court and issue has been joined. Finally, any contention that the teachers are presently operating without the benefit of a contract is specifically refuted by Article XVII, Section 1 of the Agreement which provides: The Collective Bargaining Agreement after ratification by the Board and the Association shall be effective upon the signing by the President of the Board and the President of the Association and shall remain in effect until a successor a~reement is ne~otiated. (emphasis added). Ar~ument PACT sought, and w "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_754","title":"Report: ''Little Rock School District 1995-96 Fourth Quarter Status Report, Program Planning and Budget Document for Desegregation Programs''","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1996-08-22"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance"],"dcterms_title":["Report: ''Little Rock School District 1995-96 Fourth Quarter Status Report, Program Planning and Budget Document for Desegregation Programs''"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/754"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["budgets"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nAUG 22 1996 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1995-96 FOURTH QUARTER STATUS REPORT U.S. DISTRICT COURT eastern district ARKANSAS AUG 22 1996 PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGET DOCUMENT FOR DESEGREGATION PROGRAMS JAMES VV. IVIGbUn...nu.\\, ulERK By\n_ _ _ _ _ _ Obp cl PLANNING RESEARCH AND EVALUATION AUGUST 22,1996 Office of Desegregation Monitoring TABLE OF CONTENTS Program Program Code Name Page Numbers Program Program Code Name Page Numbers 13 00 24 06 22 APIG/FOCUS ACTIVITY COLLABORATE:TRI-DIS COMPTRIZD TRANSPORT DESEGREGATION EQUITY MONITORING 001.1-001.6 002.1-002.2 003.1-003.2 004.1-004.4 005.1-005.31 07 07 EX-CURR PARTCIPATION 006.1-006.37 EX-CURRICULR:TRI-DIS 007.1-007.4 00 00 FACILITES FEDERAL PROGRAMS 008.1-008.2 009.1-009.2 00 02 00 FINANCE FOUR-YEAR-OLD PRGM GIFTED PROGRAM 010.1-010.2 011.1-011.4 012.1-012.3 00 GUID/CNSLING:TRIDIS 013.1-013.6 00 00 GUIDANCE/COUNSELING HENDERSON MAGNET 014.1-014.33 015.1-015.2 00 00 12 00 14 00 33 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 51 HIPPY INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 016.1-016.3 017.1-017.2 15 09 17 00 INFORMATION SERVICES 018.1-018.9 INTERDISTRICT SCHOOL 019.1-019.3 00 08 75 IS ACAD. ACTIVITIES 020.1-020.2 00 00 57 IS ACADEMIC PROGRAMS 021.1-021.9 IS EXTENDED DAY/WEEK 022.1-022.2 00 00 00 00 IS FOREIGN LANGUAGE IS LATIN PROGRAM 023.1-023.2 024.1-024.2 05 00 00 00 00 IS PARENT INVOLVEMNT 025.1-025.6 IS PARENT RECRUITMNT 026.1-026.3 IS POLICIES/PROCEDRE 027.1-027.5 00 29 00 00 IS SOCIAL SKILLS 028.1-028.3 00 73 IS STAFF DEVELOPMENT 029.1-029.5 00 72 IS STAFFING 030.1-030.2 00 IS STUDENT ACHIEVMNT 031.1-031.3 00 32 18 00 IS SUPPORT PROGRAMS LIBRARY/MEDIA SVS M TO M MAGNET PRGRM M TO M TRANSFERS 032.1-032.13 033.1-033.3 034.1-034.2 035.1-035.5 26 MCCLELLAN COMM. SCH. 036.1-036.2 MCCLELLAN MAGNET MEDIA SRVS:TRI-D1S MULTICULTURAL CURR. NEW FUTURES ORIGINAL MAGNETS PARENT INVL:TRI-DIS PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT PARKVIEW MAGNET PLANNING PROCUREMENT PUBLIC RELlTRI-DIS ROCK. EARLY CHILD ED SCHOOL CLIMATE SITE-BASED MANAGEMNT SPECIAL ED:TRI-DIS SPECIAL EDUCATION STAFF DEVELOPMENT STAFF DVLPMNT:TRI-DI STAFF RECUIT:TRI-DIS STUD RECUIT:TRI-DIS STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT STUDENT ASSIGNMENT STUDENT DISC:TR-DIS STUDENT RECRUITMENT SUMMER SCH:TRI-DIS TESTING TESTING: TRI-DIS VOCATIONAL EDUCATION VOCATIONL ED:TRIDIS 037.1-037.2 038.1-038.2 039.1-039.10 040.1-040.2 041.1-041.4 042.1-042.4 043.1-043.6 044.1-044.3 045.1-045.2 046.1-046.2 047.1-047.7 048.1-048.2 049.1-049.81 050.1-050.4 051.1-051.3 052.1-052.7 053.1-053.3 054.1-054.2 055.1-055.3 056.1-056.2 057.1-057.13 058.1-058.4 059.1-059.3 060.1-060.2 061.1-061.5 062.1-062.3 063.1-063.6 064.1-064.5 065.1-065.2LITTLE ROCKS SCHOOL DISTRICT PREFACE In the June 15, 1993 Court Order, the Little Rock School District (LRSD) was ordered by the Court to implement a planning and budget document to assist with its planning and budgeting process with the objective of linking programs with expenditures. The first Status Report Program Budget Document (PBD) was published and activitated in the 1993-94 school year. Since the implementation of the PBD it has been used to monitor performance and expenditures quarterly and serve as a guide for interim decision making. The result is a quarterly composite report of identified programs within the District supported with expenditure information. Over the past three years, LRSD has reassessed the structure of the PBD to implement concise reporting consistent with the Desegregation Plan with emphasis on the Districts goals and objectives. The 1995-96 AUDIT: The 1995-96 audit, conducted in two phases, was an extensive review of the districts legal obligations and their current status. During the first phase, all legal documents relating directly to the LRSD obligations in the Pulaski County Desegregation Case and the LRSD Program Budget Document (PBD) were reviewed to verify the accuracy of the LRSD Audit of Obligations conducted in 1993. During the second phase, conducted in the Spring of 1996, primary and secondary leaders met with interview teams to review obligations for which they were responsible. The status of the various obligations were recorded on scan sheets with supporting documentation required and maintained in the LRSD Office of Desegregation. Obligations identified as complete or duplicates have been removed from the PBD. PAGINATION: Pages are sequentially numbered beginning with the \"Preface.\" The \"Table of Contents\" lists programs alphabetically. Pages are numbered by program number followed by page numbers (e.g. 001 refers to the program number\n001.1-001.7 refers to the page numbers for program number 001). This Fourth Quarter Status Report Program Budget Document reports activities beginning April 1, 1996 through June 30, 1996. This report contains the following: (1) The Mission Statement of the LRSD\n(2) The Goals of the LRSD\n(3) LRSDs Quarterly Expense Summary\n(4) Explanation of Codes\nand (5) LRSDs Organizational Chart. Page 1Little Rock School District MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Little Rock School District is to equip all students with the skills and knowledge to realize their aspirations, think critically and independently, learn continously, and face the future as productive contributing citizens. This is accomplished through open access to diverse, innovative and challenging curriculum in staff dedicated to excellence and empowered with the trust and support of our community. secure environment with a a Page 2Little Rock School District GOALS By the year 2001, average student performance for every identified sub group (race, gender) will be at or above the 75th percentile as measured by standardized tests. No later than the year 2001, no fewer than 9 out of 10 students will meet or exceed LRSD standards of performance identified in the core curriculum. Each student will set and achieve challenging educational goals tailored to his or her interests, abilities and aspirations related to meaningful work, higher learning, citizenship or service to others. Page 3Little Rock School District EXPLANATION OF CODES The following are definitions for codes for the list of obligatons: Prog Name: Program Name Pri Ld: Primary Leader is the person primarily reponsible for implementation. Sec Ld: Secondary Leader is the is the person who completes the PBD and oversees the implementation. De: Original legal document from which the item comes\nCA - Curriculum audit CO - Court Order EX - Exhibit Codes are as follows: I Interdistrict Plan LR - LRSD Desegregation Plan MR - Monitoring Report SA - Settlement Agreement ST - Stipulation TR - Transcript DP: Page number from original legal document from which the item comes. Date: Date of the legal document. Abbreviated Text : Abbreviated text of the obligation or recommendation. Refer to legal reference for complete vers ion. Page 4QUARTERLY DESEGREGATION EXPENSES Code Program Name FY Budget FTE\"S YTD Expense 1st Qtr. Exp. 2nd Qtr. Exp. 3rd Qtr. Exp. 4th Qtr. Exp. % Budget Spent 13 APIG/FOCUS ACTIVITY COLLABORATE:TRI-DIS 183,900.00 .00 .00 .00 156,414.41 .00 2,278.62 .00 21,714.13 .00 60,744.00 .00 71,677.66 .00 85.05 .00 24 COMPTRIZD TRANSPORT 6 DESEGREGATION 22 7 EQUITY MONITORING EX-CURR PARTCIPATION 7 EX-CURRICULR:TRI-DIS 6,800.00 500,451.75 478,054.39 82,400.00 .00 .00 13.00 6.00 .00 .00 3,092.00 493,335.29 345,450.49 74,621.66 .00 .00 .00 .00 2 1 51 17 75 57 73 72 32 18 26 FACILITES .00 .00 .00 FEDERAL PROGRAMS FINANCE FOUR-YEAR-OLD PRGM GIFTED PROGRAM GUID/CNSLING:TRI-DIS GUIDANCE/COUNSELING HENDERSON MAGNET HIPPY INCENTIVE SCHOOLS INFORMATION SERVICES INTERDISTRICT SCHOOL IS ACAD. ACTIVITIES IS ACADEMIC PROGRAMS IS EXTENDED DAY/WEEK IS FOREIGN LANGUAGE IS GUIDANCE/COUNSEL IS LATIN PROGRAM IS PARENT INVOLVEMNT IS PARENT RECRUITMNT IS POLICIES/PROCEDRE IS SOCIAL SKILLS IS STAFF DEVELOPMENT IS STAFFING IS STUDENT ACHIEVMNT IS SUPPORT PROGRAMS LIBRARY/MEDIA SVS M TO N MAGNET PRGRM M TO M TRANSFERS MCCLELLAN COMM. SCH. MCCLELLAN MAGNET .00 .00 2,082,112.79 .00 .00 .00 .00 233,228.63 .00 717,087.08 .00 36,663.00 .00 440,719.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 27,696.00 581,135.13 .00 .00 409,808.64 359,648.82 .00 40,000.00 .00 .00 .00 88.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 20.50 .00 5.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 19.34 .00 .00 16.00 7.40 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2,174,053.34 .00 .00 .00 .00 190,759.14 .00 729,677.62 .00 27,994.02 .00 551,783.88 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 574,809.28 .00 .00 379,559.68 374,977.20 .00 .00 .00 117,897.77 161,918.28 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 204,721.39 .00 .00 .00 .00 23,352.90 .00 601,721.26 .00 .00 .00 9,751.30 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 51,226.85 .00 .00 32,881.28 29,464.29 .00 .00 .00 Page 5 122,073.85 152,635.46 63,281.52 .00 119,905.55 8,641.46 9,717.50 .00 3,092.00 133,458.12 22,255.29 1,622.64 .00 45.47 98.58 72.26 90.56 .00 .00 .00 .00 562,455.68 .00 .00 .00 .00 54,946.72 .00 44,010.36 .00 4,308.16 .00 112,740.93 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 353.61 138,877.71 .00 .00 111,904.76 109,025.66 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 570,654.94 .00 .00 .00 .00 52,704.87 .00 42,364.67 .00 7,966.18 .00 144,355.46 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 200.00 142,894.35 .00 .00 103,964.31 77,387.12 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 836,221.33 .00 .00 .00 .00 59,754.65 .00 41,581.33 .00 15,719.68 .00 284,936.19 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 385.46 241,810.37 .00 .00 130,809.33 160,099.73 .00 40,000.00 .00 .00 .00 104.42 .00 .00 .00 .00 81.79 .00 101.76 .00 76.35 .00 125.20 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 3.39 98.91 .00 .00 92.62 104.26 .00 100.00 .00Code Program Name FY Budget FTE\"S MEDIA SRVS:TRI-DIS .00 .00 12 MULTICULTURAL CURR. NEW FUTURES 123,868.60 .00 5.00 .00 14 ORIGINAL MAGNETS 33 PARENT INVL:TRI-DIS PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 4,336,650.00 .00 .00 .00 15 9 8 5 77 29 PARKVIEW MAGNET 34,000.00 .00 .00 .00 PLANNING .00 .00 QUARTERLY DESEGREGATION EXPENSES YTD Expense 1st Qtr. Exp. 2nd Qtr. Exp. 3rd Qtr. Exp. 4th Qtr. Exp. % Budget Spent .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 100,674.68 .00 11,354.76 .00 23,348.05 .00 33,610.84 .00 32,361.03 .00 81.28 .00 4,472,530.11 .00 .00 .00 1,546,290.00 .00 1,503,150.75 .00 1,423,089.36 .00 103.13 .00 .00 .00 .00 298.48 .00 .00 7,810.92 .00 7,946.02 .00 17,944.58 .00 100.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 PROCUREMENT PUBLIC REL:TRI-DIS ROCK. EARLY CHILD ED SCHOOL CLIMATE SITE-BASED MANAGEMNT SPECIAL EDzTRI-DIS SPECIAL EDUCATION STAFF DEVELOPMENT STAFF DVLPMNT:TRI-DI STAFF RECUIT:TRI-DIS STUD RECUIT:TRI-DIS STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT STUDENT ASSIGNMENT STUDENT DISC:TR-DIS STUDENT RECRUITMENT SUMMER SCH:TRI-DIS SUMMER SCHOOL: JTPA TESTING TESTING: TRI-DIS VOCATIONAL EDUCATION VOCATIONL EDzTRI-DIS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 56,846.12 448,983.75 .00 53,469.17 .00 .00 .00 94,826.02 .00 .00 .00 4,307.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 7.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 2.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 53,699.13 361,425.28 .00 54,098.42 .00 .00 .00 101,553.02 .00 .00 .00 2,894.81 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 8,944.07 78,332.41 .00 13,165.13 .00 .00 .00 23,067.57 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 13,644.06 89,096.52 .00 12,630.44 .00 .00 .00 23,801.73 .00 .00 .00 325.90 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 12,977.04 90,452.47 .00 12,527.47 .00 .00 .00 25,556.88 .00 .00 .00 1,284.91 .00 .00 .00 Page 6 .00 .00 .00 .00 18,133.96 103,543.88 .00 15,775.38 .00 .00 .00 29,126.81 .00 .00 .00 1,284.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 94.46 80.50 .00 101.18 .00 .00 .00 107.09 .00 .00 .00 67.21 .00 .00 .00LRSD FY /96 Program Budget Document Program Name: Program Code: APiG/Focus Activity 13 Primary Leader: Asst Supts Secondary Leader: Principals Report Date: Page: 8/20/96 7 Program Description: AREA SCHOOL STUDENTS WILL PARTICIPATE IN ONGOING AND MEANINGFUL ENRICHMENT ACTIVITIES THAT COMPLIMENT AND EXTEND THE CORE CURRICULUM. THE REGULAR OPERATION BUDGET IN TWENTY THREE AREA ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS WILL BE SUPPLEMENTED WITH AN ALLOCATION OF $20.00 PER STUDENT. FY Program Budget: $183,900.00 1st Qtr Expend: $2,278.62 3rd Qtr Expend: $60,744.00 FTE: .00 YTD Expenditures: $156,414.41 2nd Qtr Expend: $21,714.13 4th Qtr Expend: $71,677.66 %Budget Spent: 85.05 % 1.1I LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Report Date: Page: 8/20/96 8 ID Program Name Primary Leader Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC Exx: Abbreviated Text Page Date 000817 APIG/Focus Activity Asst Supts Principals LR 81 4/29/92 Implement Focused Activities in Elementary Area Sc 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 ACTIVITIES AND MATERIALS ON GOING 6/03/96 SUBMITTED REPORT ON FOCUS ACTIVITIES PROGRESS 000030 JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/30/96 4TH GRADE TO ARTS CENTER. 5/01/96 4TH GRADE TO HEIFER PROJECT. 5/06/96 5TH AND 6TH GRADES TO ROBINSON AUD. PROGRAM. 000033 MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/03/96 ALL FOCUS ACTIVITIES COMPLETED FOR YEAR 000043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 6/04/96 NOT APPLICABLE AT THIS TIME 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 TEACHING PHONICS WAS IMPLEMENTED IM GR. K-6 TEACHING SHURLEY METHOD WAS IMPLEMENTED GR. 1-6 000818 APIG/Focus Activity Asst Supts Principals LR 83 4/29/92 Principal Appoints Activities Coordinator and Stee 000043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 6/04/96 NOT APPLICABLE AT THIS TIME 000046 MABELVALE ELEMENTARY 5/01/96 COORDINATORS 000819 APIG/Focus Activity Asst Supts Principals LR 83 4/29/92 Develop Activities Action Plan 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 COE PLAN ON GOING 000038 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 4/01/96 PRINCIPAL WILL MONITOR TEACHERS ACTION PLAN 1.2ID Program Name Primary Leader Report DateI 8/20/96 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Page i 9 Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Abbreviated Text Page Date 000043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 6/04/96 NOT APPLICABLE AT THIS TIME 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 FOCUSED ACTIVITIES INTERFACED WITH TITLE I PROJECT 4/01/96 \u0026amp; SCHOOL PLAN 000820 APIG/Focus Activity Asst Supts Principals LR 83 4/29/92 Develop Checklist to Monitor Program 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 COE PLAN ON GOING 000038 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 6/01/96 A NARRATIVE WILL BE SUBMITTED AT THE END OF THE 6/01/96 YEAR REGARDING PROGRESS. 000043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 6/04/96 NOT APPLICABLE AT THIS TIME 000046 MABELVALE ELEMENTARY 5/01/96 CHECKLIST DEVELOPED 000821 APIG/Focus Activity Asst Supts Principals LR 83 4/29/92 Use Checklist to Assist Activities Coordinator 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 COE PLAN ON GOING 000043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 6/04/96 NOT APPLICABLE AT THIS TIME 000046 MABELVALE ELEMENTARY 5/01/96 CHECKLIST USED 000822 APIG/Focus Activity Asst Supts Principals LR 85 4/29/92 Provide Means for Area Schools to Reduce Disparity 000017 DALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 MATERIALS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES ORDERED AND DELIVERED 1.3ID Program Name Primary Leader 5/10/96 6/03/96 FIELD TRIP 000038 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC ixx: DOC Page Date PURCHASE PROGRES FOR FALL SCHOOL YEAR PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 5/01/96 5/01/96 CONTINUE TO USE AGIG FUNDS TO REDUCE DISPARITY PRINCIPAL WILL SUBMIT APIG PROGRESS REPORT. 000043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 6/04/96 NOT APPLICABLE AT THIS TIME 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 FOCUSED ACTIVITIES BUDGET WAS SPENT TO ENRICH LEARNING OF ALL STUDENTS WHILE PARTICULARLY ADDRESSING THE NEEDS OF STUDENTS WHO SCORED BELOW 50TH PERCENTILE IN READING, MATH, L.A. 000828 APIG/Focus Activity Asst Supts Principals LR 85 4/29/92 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 MRS. ROUSE, COUNSELOR, RECEIVED A CAREER GRANT FROM THE STATE DEPT. OF EDUCATION - $2500.00 000043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 6/04/96 NO ACTIVITY THIS QUARTER 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 LRSD FACILITATED IMPLEMENTATION BY MAKING FUNDS AVAILABLE FROM THE START OF THE YEAR 000829 APIG/Focus Activity Asst Supts Principals LR 85 4/29/92 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/05/96 6/10/96 SUBMITTED TO ASST. SUPT WRITE AND SUBMITTED ANNUAL REPORT 000029 WESTERN HILLS ELEM. SCHOOL 6/07/96 ANNUAL REPORT DISCUSSES FOCUS ACTIVITIES PROGRESS 1.4 Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text Make Grant Awards 8/20/96 Submit Schools Progress Reports 10LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Report Datet Page: 8/20/96 11 Legal Reference ID Program Name Primary Leader Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Abbreviated Text Page Date 6/07/96 FOCUS ACTIVITIES PROGRAM EVALUATED BY SCHOOL 000033 MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/05/96 ANNUAL REPORT SUBMITTED 000038 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 6/01/96 PRINCIPAL WILL SUBMIT APIG PROGRESS REPORT. 000043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 6/04/96 END OF THE YEAR REPORT COMPLETED 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 6/26/96 PRINCIPAL SUBMITTED PROGRESS REPORT TO ASST SUPT 000048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/11/96 ANNUAL REPORT SUBMITTED 000830 APIG/Focus Activity Asst Supts Principals LR 85 4/29/92 Conduct Program Evaluation 000004 METRO VO-TECH/EDUC. CENTER 5/01/96 PROGRAM EVALUATION 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5/23/96 FOCUS ACTIVITIES COMMITTEE MET \u0026amp; REVIEWED 5/23/96 FOCUS ACTIVITIES CRITERIA SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT 5/23/96 WAS WRITTEN AND INCLUDED IN ANNUAL REPORT 6/10/96 SUBMITTEDD ANNUAL REPORT 000020 MCDERMOTT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/08/96 CONDUCT APIG EVALUATION FOR 95-96 000031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY 6/06/96 EVALUATE FOCUS ACTIVITY \u0026amp;/OR APIG 000033 MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/04/96 TEACHERS PROVIDED EVALUATION OF INDIVIDUAL PROGRAM 1.5ID Program Mame Primary Leader 6/05/96 000043 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date ANNUAL REPORT CONTAINS PROGRAM EVALUATIONS WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 6/04/96 6/04/96 MAGNET SCHOOL MISSION AND PROGRAM EVALUATED EACH QUARTER 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 6/26/96 DELIVERED PROGRAM EVALUATION TO ASST. SUPT. 000046 MABELVALE ELEMENTARY 6/04/96 PROGRAM EVALUATION 000048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/11/96 ANNUAL REPORT SUBMITTED Report Date* Page: Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 12LRSD FY /96 Program Budget Document Program Name: Program Code: Collaborate\nTri-Dis 00 Primary Leader: SUPT Secondary Leaden ASSOC SUPT Report Date: Page: 8/20/96 13 Program Description: COOPERATION AMONG THE THREE PULASKI COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTS IS CRUCIAL TO THE SUCCESS OP THE COUNTYWIDE DESEGREGATION PLAN. THE THREE DISTRICTS WORK COLLABORATIVELY IN THE AREAS OF STUDENT ASSIGNMENT, STAFF AND STUDENT RECRUITMENT TO ENSURE THAT ALL STUDENTS ARE PROVIDED WITH EQUAL OPPORTUNITUES AND AH ORDERLY, SUPPORTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT. FY Program Budget: $.00 1st Qtr Expend: $.00 3rd Qtr Expend: $.00 FTE: .00 YTD Expenditures: $.00 2nd Qtr Expend: $.00 4th Qtr Expend: $.00 %Budget Spent: .00 % 2.1ID Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Page Date 000537 CollaboratexTri-Dis SUPT ASSOC SUPT LR 47 000538 Collaborate:Tri-Dis SUPT ASSOC SUPT LR 47 002205 Collaborate\nTri-Dis SUPT ASSOC SUPT I 24 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 000064 ASSC SUPT/ORGN. \u0026amp; LRNG EQUITY 5/29/96 MAYO MET WITH BOWLES-PCSSD, ACKLIN-NLRSD 002206 Collaborate:Tri-Dis SUPT ASSOC SUPT I 24 4/29/92 000064 ASSC SUPT/ORGN. \u0026amp; LRNG EQUITY 5/08/96 5/08/96 PRESS CONF. ANNOUNCING LRSD 96.3 COMPLIANCE WITH IDENTIFIED OBLIGATIONS 002207 Collaborate:Tri-Dis SUPT ASSOC SUPT I 24 4/29/92 000064 ASSC SUPT/ORGN. \u0026amp; LRNG EQUITY 5/29/96 5/29/96 MAYO MET WITH BOWLES-PCSSD, ACKLIN-NLRSD, TO DISCU CONCERNS THAT ALL 3 DISTS. HAD RELATING TO EACH 002208 CollaboratexTri-Dis SUPT ASSOC SUPT I 24 4/29/92 000064 ASSC SUPT/ORGN. \u0026amp; LRNG EQUITY 5/29/96 5/29/96 MAYO MET WITH BOWLES-PCSSD, ACKLIN-PCSSD AND DISCUSSED ISSUES THAT WERE OF CONCERN 2.2 Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 14 Collaborate with PCSSD/NLRSD to Facilitate/Enhance Use strategies contained in the *Inter-Dist. Deseg Appoint tri-dist. improvement council Address ongoing planning for deseg Appoint comm, for specific concerns Meet concerning coordinating areas related to theLRSD FY /96 Program Budget Document Program Name: Program Code: Comptrizd Transport 24 Primary Leader: Hng Sup Serv Secondary Leader: Dir Transport Progrcun Description: TRANSPORTATION FY Program Budget\nYTD Expenditures: Report Date: Page: SYSTEM PROVIDES THE MEANS FOR STUDENTS TO HAVE ACCESS TO VARIOUS SCHOOL OPTIONS AND EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS, AS WELL AS EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES. THE DISTRICT WILL CONTINNUE TO USE ITS AUTOMATED ROUTING SYSTEM TO MAKE EFFICIENT USE OF DISTRICT RESOURCES IN PROVIDING TRANSPORTATION TO THOSE STUDENTS ELIGIBLE FOR TRANSPORTATION. $6,800.00 $3,092.00 1st Qtr Expend: 2nd Qtr Expend: $.00 $.00 3.1 3rd Qtr Expend: 4th Qtr Expend: $.00 $3,092.00 8/20/96 15 FTE: %Budget Spent: .00 45.47 % ID Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Datet Paget Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 16 003146 Comptrizd Transport 003213 Comptrizd Transport 004167 Comptrizd Transport Mng Mng Mng Sup Serv Sup Serv Sup Serv Dir Transport Dir Transport Dir Transport I 5 4/29/92 Nothing prohibits students choosing bus ride longe C8 40 4/29/92 Black studs, not only children required to be buse CO 17 10/02/49 File business case which explains the money on tra 3.2LRSD FY /96 Program Budget: Document Report Date: Page: 8/20/96 17 Program Name: Program Code: Desegregation 06 Primary Leader: Assoc Supt Secondary Leader: Asst Supts Program Description: THE OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION IS CHARGED WITH MONITORING OF THE DESEGREGATION PLAN WHICH INCLUDES THE APPROPRIATE ASSIGNMENT OF STUDENTS TO SCHOOLS. FY Program Budget: $500,451.75 1st Qtr Expend: $117,897.77 3rd Qtr Expend: $119,905.55 FTE: 13.00 YTD Expenditures: $493,335.29 2nd Qtr Expend: $122,073.85 4th Qtr Expend: $133,458.12 %Budget Spent: 98.58 % 4.1 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Report Datet Paget 8/20/96 18 Legal Reference ID Program Name Primary Leader Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Abbreviated Text Page Date 000936 Desegregation Assoc Supt Asst Supts LR 28 4/29/92 Monitor the Desegregation Plan 000130 ASST. SUPT/ELEM-GREMILLION 4/01/96 ALL PRINCIPALS PROVIDED EVIDENCE OF OBLIGATIONS 4/01/96 COMPLETED IN THE DESEGREGATION PLAN AND PLACED IN 4/01/96 FOLDERS. 4/04/96 DESEGREGATION INSERVICE WITH PRINCIPALS. 4/16/96 INSERVICE ON DISPARITY DR. EDWIN JACKSON. 000131 ASST. SUPT/ELEM-MITCHELL 6/01/96 NO ACTIVITIES THIS QUARTER 000937 Desegregation 000938 Desegregation Assoc Assoc Supt Supt Dir PRE Asst Supts LR CO 226 4/29/92 2 12/16/94 Review Program Budget Documents Conduct site visits 000130 ASST. SUPT/ELEM-GREMILLION 4/01/96 ALL SCHOOLS VISITED THROUGHOUT THE QUARTER AND 4/01/96 COMPLETED FINAL EVALUATIONS. 4/01/96 MABELVALE ELEN. AND GEYER SPRINGS COE TEAM VISITS. 4/03/96 DODD PRINCIPAL CONFERENCE. 4/04/96 4/04/96 BALE PRINCIPAL CONFERENCE. BADGETT CONFERENCE. 4/04/96 BADGETT VISIT. 4/22/96 MABELVALE ELEM. AND GEYER SPRINGS COE TEAM VISITS. 5/06/96 5/06/96 5/06/96 GARIiAND VISITS (4 HRS.) - 5/6, 5/7, 5/8 GARLAND VISITS (4 HRS. EACH) - 5/6, 5/7, 5/8. GARLAND VISITS (4 HRS EACH) - 5/6, 5/7, 5/8. 000131 ASST. SUPT/ELEM-MITCHELL 5/06/96 CONDUCT SITE VISITS DURING FINAL QUARTER 000939 Desegregation Assoc Supt Asst Supts CO 2 12/16/94 Develop and implement improvement plans 000130 ASST. SUPT/ELEM-GREMILLION 4/18/96 PRINCIPALSINSERVICE/HARTLY JACKSON/TESTING. 4.2ID Program Name Primary Leader 6/10/96 6/11/96 6/11/96 000131 ASST. 6/14/96 6/14/96 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date SCHEDULED PERSONAL CONFERENCES WITH EACH PRINCIPAL TO REVIEW EVALUATIONS AND DISCUSS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE 1996-97 SCHOOL YEAR. SUPT/ELEM-MITCHELL REVIEW IMPLEMENTATION OF COE PLANS AS PART OF ANNUAL REPORTS. 000940 Desegregation Assoc Supt Asst Supts CO 2 12/16/94 000130 ASST. SUPT/ELEM-GREMILLION 6/10/96 6/10/96 6/11/96 6/11/96 6/11/96 6/11/96 RECEIVED ALL FINAL END OF THE YEAR REPORTS. RECEIVED ALL FINAL END OF THE YEAR REPORTS. WILL WILL READ AND MAKE NOTES FOR FALL CONFERENCES WITH THE PRINCIPALS. READ AND MAKE NOTES FOR FALL CONFERENCES WITH THE PRINCIPALS. 000941 Desegregation Assoc Supt Asst Supts CO 2 12/16/94 000130 ASST. 6/11/96 6/11/96 6/11/96 6/11/96 SUPT/ELEM-GREMILLION WILL DISCUSS AREAS OF IDENTIFIED WEAKNESSES FROM END OF YEAR REPORTS IN FALL CONFERENCES. WILL DISCUSS AREAS OF IDENTIFIED WEAKNESSES FROM END OF YEAR REPORTS IN FALL CONFERENCES. Report Datet Paget Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 19 Monitor implementation of improvement plans Identify statutes and regulations that impede dese 000947 Desegregation 000948 Desegregation 001188 Desegregation 001189 Desegregation 001190 Desegregation 001191 Desegregation 001192 Desegregation 001193 Desegregation 001194 Desegregation 001195 Desegregation Assoc Assoc Supt Supt Dir PRE Dir PRE I I 6 6 Bd of Directors Bd of Directors Bd of Directors Bd of Directors Bd of Directors Bd of Directors Bd of Directors Bd of Directors Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 Make quarterly reports to the Office of Desegregat Provide reasonable access to data to eval. succ. o Create environment encouraging academic and human Keep Citizens/Staff Informed Conduct self evaluations of commitment to deseg. Delineate LRSD Deseg Mission to Staff \u0026amp; Community Use Deseg Mission to Develop Policies Expect Adm. Staff to Provide Structured Leadership Examine Racial Makeup of Staff Develop Budget Consistent w/Policies 4.3 ID Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 20 001196 Desegregation 001197 Desegregation 001198 Desegregation 003218 Desegregation 003221 Desegregation 003222 Desegregation Bd of Directors Bd of Directors Bd of Directors MNG SUP SERV Bd of Directors Bd of Directors Supt Supt Supt MNG FINANCE Supt Supt 4.4 LR LR LR C8 C8 C8 3 3 2 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 5 11/01/49 5 11/01/49 5 11/01/49 PROVIDE Staff Development Deseg. Needs Restructuring DIST TO ELIMINATE Discrimination Improve human relations climate Uo retreat! Double funding for students attending No retreat: Effort to eliminate achievement dispar No retreat: Appropriate involvement of parentsLRSD FY /96 Program Budget Document Program Name: Program Code: Equity Monitoring 22 Primary Leader: Supt Secondary Leader: Assoc Supt Program Description: LRSD WILL USE FY Program Budget: YTD Expenditures: Report Date: Page: THE METHOD OF MONITORING TO ASSESS EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS\nMONITORING EDUCATION DESEGRE- GATION BASED UPON THE EDUCATIONAL EQUITY CONCEPT WILL BE USED IN THE SCHOOLS. A SECOND MONITORING AND EVALUATION INSTRUMENT WILL BE GEARED TOWARD THE PROGRAM IN THE INCENTIVE SCHOOLS. THE DISTRICT- WIDE BI-RACIAL COMMITTEE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANNUAL MONITORING OF DESEGREGATION IMPLEMENTATION. LRSD WILL MONITOR EDUCATIONAL EQUITY IN ALL SCHOOLS IN THE DISTRICT. THE MONITORING WILL BE CONDUCTED BY THE PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION (PRE)STAFF WITH ASSISTANCE FROM IZX:AL BI-RACIAL COMMITTEES CONSISTING OF PARENTS. EACH COMMITTEE WILL CONDUCT AT LEAST ONE SCHOOL VISIT EACH SEMESTER, USING A MONITORING INSTRUMENT DEVELOPED BY THE THREE DISTRICTS. THE INCENTIVE SCHOOLS WILL BE MONITORED AT LEAST ONCE EACH QUARTER BY THE DISTRICT-WIDE BI-RACIAL COMMITTEE. THE COMMITTEE WILL REPORT SEMIANNUALLY TO THE SUPERINTENDENT THE PROGRESS OR LACK OF PROGRESS IN THE SCHOOLS. $478,054.39 $345,450.49 1st Qtr Expend: 2nd Qtr Expend: $161,918.28 $152,635.46 5.1 3rd Qtr Expend: 4th Qtr Expend: $8,641.46 8/20/96 21 FTE: $22,255.29 %Budget Spent: 6.00 72.26ID Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date 000396 Equity Monitoring Supt Assoc Supt LR 30 4/29/92 000064 ASSC SUPT/ORGN. \u0026amp; LRNG EQUITY 6/28/96 AN ORGRANIZATIONAL CHART WAS PRESENTED TO LRSD BOA 6/28/96 6/28/96 AND THE BOARD DID NOT ACCEPT THE NEW STRUCTURE. A THIS TIME A NEW ORGANIZATIONAL CHART HAS NOT BEEN 6/28/96 BOARD APPROVED. 000398 Equity Monitoring Asst Supts Principals LR 30 4/29/92 000007 DUNBAR MAGNET JR. HIGH Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 22 Ensure Organizational Structure providing equal op Appoint School Based Bi-racial Comm, to monitor 4/01/96 SCHL BSD CMTEE FRMDMTNG REGLRLY 000008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL 4/04/96 BI-RACIAL COMM MEETING 5/02/96 BI-RACIAL COMM MEETING 000010 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 4/19/96 BI-RACIAL MEETING 000012 MCCLELLAN COMMUNITY HIGH 4/01/96 LOCAL BI RACIAL COMMITTEE MET. 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/08/96 FINAL BI-RACIAL COMM. MEETING CONDUCTED WITH 4/08/96 MEETING WITH MINUTES ON FILE. 000027 GIBBS MAGNET SCHOOL 4/01/96 EQUITY MONITORING TEAM 4/01/96 5/05/96 EQUITY MONITORING TEAM VISIT 000037 GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY 4/07/96 COMMITTEE CONDUCTED SITE VISIT AND MADE RECOMMENDA 5.2ID Program Name Primary Leader 4/07/96 5/07/96 5/07/96 TIONS. LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date APPOINT SCH BASED BI-RACIAL COMM TO MONITOR APPOINT SCH BASED BI-RACIAL COMM TO MONITOR 000043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 5/28/96 NO NEW ACTIVITY THIS QUARTER 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 ON 3/5/96, BIR.COM. SENT REPORT TO SCHOOL 000399 Equity Monitoring Asst Supts Principals LR 30 4/29/92 000043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 5/28/96 NO NEW ACTIVITY THIS QUARTER 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 ON 2/29/96, BIRACIAL COMMITTEE REPORTED YES\" IN VIRTUALLY ALL AREAS MONITORED 000400 Equity Monitoring Asst Supts Principals LR 30 4/29/92 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 4/01/96 EQUITY MONITORING VISIT 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5/02/96 6/07/96 PARENT/TEACHER CONFERENCES HELD PROGRESS REPORT SENT HOME 000037 GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY 4/07/96 LRSD ESTABLISHED PBD REPORTING SYSTEM 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 ON 3/5/96, BIR.COM.REPORT WAS RECEIVED AT SCHOOL 000051 WAKEFIELD ELEMENTARY 5/06/96 THE EQUITY MONITORING REPORT WAS SHARED BY THE 5.3 Report Date: Page i Abbreviated Text Dist. Bi-racial 8/20/96 23 Will Monitor Deseg. Efforts Establish Reporting System ID Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUIX3ET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Date: Paget Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 24 5/06/96 COMMITTEE IN MAY STAFF MEETING. 000116 THE ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 4/01/96 5/13/96 5/20/96 6/03/96 6/03/96 6/04/96 ROLL 22 REPORT ROLL 23 REPORT ALE REPORT REPORT CARDS DISCIPLINE REPORT ANNUAL ADE REPORT 000401 Equity Monitoring Asst Supts Principals LR 30 4/29/92 Provide Staff Inservice on Equity Concerns 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/02/96 DISCUSSION/UPDATE/REVIEW OF EQUITY MONITORING VISIT(FAC. MTG.) 000003 MANN MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET 4/05/96 4/09/96 4/17/96 5/07/96 5/15/96 STAFF DEVELOPMENT DAY FACULTY MEETING EARLY DISMISSAL FACULTY MEETING EARLY DISMISSAL 000004 METRO VO-TECH/EDUC. CENTER 4/17/96 INSERVICE TEACHER (TEAM BUILDING) 000006 BOOKER MAGNET SCHOOL 4/05/96 4/05/96 5/15/96 5/20/96 STRATEGIC PLANNING BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT PLANNING FOR 1996-97 MATH/SCIENCE ACTIVITIES FOR ALL LEARNING MODALITIE UTILIZING TUTORS IN THE CLASSROOM 000007 DUNBAR MAGNET JR. HIGH 4/01/96 EQTY CNCRNS ADRSSD IN FCLTY MTNGS ALSO ON 5/6/96LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Report Datet Paget 8/20/96 25 Legal Reference ID Program Name Primary Leader Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Abbreviated Text Page Date 4/01/96 4/05/96 ENGNRG PROF(SECME) PROG FOR MIN STDNTS STFF DVLPMNT 4/30/96 4/30/96 6/16/96 LAP TCHRS MTNG/W DIST COORD SECME TCHRS/PRIN TO SUMMER INSTITUTE 6/16-25 000008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL 4/02/96 EQUITY INSERV FOR STAFF 5/15/96 MULTI CULTURAL INSERV FOR STAFF 000009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 4/17/96 INCLUSIONARY EDUCATION 000010 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 4/17/96 5/10/96 NATIONAL SERV LEARN CONF DETROIT MICH 4/17-4/20 REGIONAL SERV LEARN CONF 5/10-5/12 BILOIX MISS 000011 SOUTHWEST JUNIOR HIGH 4/15/96 SWJH HOSTED A WORKSHOP ON \" UNDERSTANDING DIVERSIT 4/15/96 FROM 4-7 P.M. 000013 HENDERSON JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4/05/96 LEARNING STYLES/TEACHING STYLES INSERVICE 4/17/96 COE DEVELOPMENT 000016 MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4/05/96 STAFF DEVELOPMENT (CONFLICT RESOULTION) 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/05/96 4-YEAR OLD INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES INSERVICE 4/17/96 5/15/96 4-YEAR OLD INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES INSERVICE 4-YEAR OLD INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES INSERVICE 000027 GIBBS MAGNET SCHOOL 4/03/96 SCHOOL LAW 5.5ID Program Name Primary Leader 4/03/96 SCHOOL LAW LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date 4/04/96 STANFORD-8 INSERVICE 4-6 4/04/96 4/05/96 STRATEGIC PLANNING INSERVICE 4/05/96 STRATEGIC PLANNING 4/16/96 GOVERNOR'S CONFERENCE ON SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 4/16/96 GOVERNORS CONFERENCE ON SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 4/17/96 COE 4/17/96 COE INSERVICE 4/22/96 OFFICIAL FRENCH WELCOME 4/22/96 OFFICIAL FRENCH WELCOME 4/30/96 MEDIA INSERVICE 4/30/96 MEDIA INSERVICE 000030 JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/05/96 SUCCEEDING WITH DIFFICULT STUDENTS-LEE CANTER. 4/17/96 RACIAL AND CULTURAL DIVERSITY. 5/15/96 LITERATURE ACROSS THE CURRICULUM. 000035 M.L. KING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/05/96 STAFF MEMBERS PARTICIPATED IN LRSD STAFF DEVELOPME 4/17/96 STAFF MEMBERST PARTICIPATED IN HARCOURT BRACE STAF 4/17/96 DEVELOPMENT Report Datez Page: Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 26 5/15/96 STAFF MEMBERST PARTICIPATED IN STAFF DEVELOPMENT O 5/15/96 K-4 CRUSADE STRATEGIES 000042 WASHINGTON BASIC SKILLS 4/01/96 K-3 COMPACTING 4/04/96 INSERVICE TRAINING FOR AIDES PERFORMANCE EVALS. 4/17/96 ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER 5/09/96 INSERVICE TRAINING FOR AIDES-INTERPERSONAL COMMUN. 000043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 4/17/96 IN-SERVICE HELD FOR STAFF ON INCLUSION 5.6Report Date: 8/20/96 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Page: 27 Legal Reference ID Program Name Primary Leader Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Abbreviated Text Page Date 5/15/96 5/15/96 STAFF IN-SERVICE HELD ON K-4 MATH TECHNIQUES IN-SERVICE HELD FOR STAFF ON K-4 MATH TECHNIQUES 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/17/96 RECORD KEEPING FOR EQUITY IN RECOMMENDING STUDENTS 4/17/96 FOR SOCIAL SKILLS ROOM AND IN MANAGING ROOM 000048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/05/96 4/05/96 STRATEGIC PLAN CRISIS INTERVENTION 4/05/96 4/17/96 SCIENCE CRUSADE ECOE REVIEW AND UPDATE 5/06/96 6/11/96 PARENT INVOLVEMENT TITLE I TEAM BUILDING (03/06/96) 000050 OTTER CREEK ELEMENTARY 4/19/96 5/15/96 ACCELARATED READER BY LLOYD HARRIS TRAINER OF TRAINERS MATH AND SCIENCE 000116 THE ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 4/01/96 INSERVICE ON TEACHING THINKING SKILLS 4/17/96 5/06/96 EARLY OUT INSERVICE WORKSHOP INSERVICE ON BRINGING LESSONS TO LIFE 5/15/96 5/20/96 INSERVICE THROUGHOUT DISTRICT DISTRICT WIDE PRINCIPALS MEETING 6/04/96 INSERVICE ON SETTING HIGH EXPECTATIONS 000403 Equity Monitoring Asst Supts Principals LR 30 4/29/92 Provide Prog, to Raise Parental Awareness as mini- 000001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL 4/17/96 L.O.V.E. TEAM INTERVIEWS 4/18/96 4/19/96 SECME MEETING IN BOARD ROOM IITH GRADE PILOT EXAM 4/19/96 SEYMOUR TERRY SCHOLARSHIP APPLICATION PROCESS 5.7ID Program Name Primary Leader 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 4/18/96 5/16/96 6/10/96 6/24/96 000006 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader P.T.A. MEETING P.T.A. MEETING P.T.A. MEETING P.T.A. MEETING BOOKER MAGNET SCHOOL 4/16/96 JUDGE MARION HUMPHREY PTA MTG Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date 000008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL 4/16/96 SR PARENTS MEETING 4/16/96 FIN AID WORKSHOP - QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 000012 MCCLELLAN COMMUNITY HIGH 4/08/96 REPORT CARDS 4/09/96 PTSA EXECUTIVE BOARD MEETING. Report Date: Paget Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 28 4/20/96 4/25/96 4/29/96 6/14/96 SENIOR CITIZEN HEALTH FAIR PARENTS NIGHT OUT BAND HONORS NIGHT REPORT CARDS 000016 MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 5/28/96 TITLE I PARENT MEETING 5/28/96 AWARDS ASSEMBLY 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/13/96 4/15/96 SUPER SATURDAY PARENT TRAINING EARLY CHILDHOOD TASK FORCE MEETING 4/19/96 4/20/96 5/03/96 REGIONAL PTA CONFERENCES SUPER SATURDAY PARENT TRAINING TITLE 1 PARENT PLANNING MEETING 5/13/96 TITLE I CONFERENCE, WEST MEMPHIS 5_. aID Program Name Primary Leader 5/14/96 5/18/96 5/20/96 000027 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader SUPER SATURDAY PARENT TRAINING Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date TITLE 1 PARENT INVOLVEMENT AWARDS PICNIC EARLY CHILDHOOD TASK FORCE MEETING GIBBS MAGNET SCHOOL 4/03/96 MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY Report Datet Paget Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 29 4/04/96 4/05/96 4/10/96 CHILDREN'S MUSEUM PARENT CONFERENCES - G/T POTENTIALS CUSTODIAN APPRECIATION 4/12/96 FRENCH STUDENTS ARRIVAL 4/15/96 FRENCH STUDENTS TO LITTLE ROCK ZOO 4/17/96 4/17/96 4/18/96 BUS DRIVER APPRECIATION FRENCH STUDENTS TO STATE CAPITOL AND CHILDREN MUSE CENTRAL ARKANSAS LIBRARY GROUNDBREAKING CEREMONY 4/19/96 EARTH DAY PARADE 4/20/96 G/T STATE COMPETITION 4/22/96 VIPS EVENING FOR THE STARS 4/24/96 COE TEAM VISIT 4/27/96 CHAPTER I PARENT TRAINING 4/30/96 5/01/96 QUIZ BOWL FINALS OPERA-THREE LITTLE PIGS (WILDWOOD) 5/02/96 CINCO DE MAYO FESTIVAL 5/03/96 RIVERFRONT PARK, LIBRARY, ZOO FIELD TRIPS 5/06/96 5/07/96 HEIFER PROJECT FIELD TRIP TEACHER APPRECIATION 5/09/96 INTERNATIONAL FESTIVAL 5/10/96 5/14/96 SALUTE TO VOLUNTEERS RECEPTION 5TH/6TH GRADE MUSICAL - RHYTHMS 5/16/96 BASKETBALL TOURNAMENT 5/17/96 6TH GRADE FIELD TRIP TO MEMPHIS CIVIL RIGHTS MUS 000030 JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/04/96 SECME MULTICULTURAL NIGHT. 5.9 ID Program Name Primary Leader 4/17/96 000032 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader ETC PARENT ORIENTATION. DODD ELEMENTARY 4/19/96 4/19/96 000033 Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date HONORS ASSEMBLY: ACADEMIC - A'S, B'S\nATTENDANCE CITIZENSHIP. HONORS COUPONS - TIA'S, BONANZA, 6 MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5/14/96 HELD PARENT MAKE-AND-TAKE WORKSHOP 000037 GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY 4/08/96 4/22/96 5/13/96 PTA ADVISORY COUNCIL PTA MEETING PTA ADVISORY COUNCIL 000043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL Report Datei Page t Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 30 5/28/96 5/28/96 ORIENTATION HELD FOR NEW KINDERGARTEN STUDENTS/PAR ORIENTATION HELD FOR PROSPECTIVE KINDERGARTEN PAR. 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/04/96 4/04/96 4/04/96 4/04/96 4/18/96 4/18/96 4/18/96 5/09/96 5/09/96 5/30/96 EVENING PARENT MEETING ATTENDED BY 16 PARENTS AND SIX STAFF MEMBERS\nTEACHERS PROVIDED INSERVICE ABOUT PHONICS AND EARLY CHILDHOOD\nPRINCIPAL PROVIDED OVERVIEW OF ACHIEVEMENT DATA EVENING PARENT MEETING\nTEACHERS \u0026amp; PRINCIPAL PROVIDED MINI-INSERVICE SESSIONS ABOUT KDG., SHURLEY METHOD, STORYTELLING, AND SAT-8 RESULTS EVENING PARENT MEETING ATTENDED BY 14 PARENTS TO DISCUSS DRAFT OF TITLE I SCHOOLWIDE GRANT APP. EVENING PARENT MEETING TO FINALIZE TITLE I APP. 000048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5/14/96 TITLE I PARENT MEETING 000405 Equity Monitoring Asst Supts Principals LR 30 4/29/92 Monitor School Standards for high quality ed. w/ s 5. lOID Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 31 4/05/96 PRINCIPAL/ART TEACHERS ON TEXTBOOK SELECTION COMM. 4/17/96 4/17/96 4TH 9 WKS. FLAGGING OF DS/F'S FOR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION BY COUNSELORS (FAC. MEETING) 000003 HANN MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET 4/05/96 TEACHER EVALUATIONS 000005 PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 5/01/96 5/01/96 ADM. FINAL APPRAISAL CONF. WITH TEACHERS ADM. FINAL APPRAISAL CONF. WITH SUPPORT STAFF 000007 DUNBAR MAGNET JR. HIGH 4/01/96 DATA PRVDED TO MNTRNG TEAM 4/08/96 4/23/96 REPORT CARDS INTRVW RPRTS ISSUED 4/23/96 COE STATE VSTATN/EVAL 000008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL 4/05/96 COE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 4/17/96 EQUITY INSERVICE 000013 HENDERSON JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4/08/96 REVIEW GRADE DISTRIBUTION ONGOING 4/23/96 REVIEW INTERIM REPORTS 000016 MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 5/31/96 EVALUATION/UPDATED LAP PROGRAM 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/03/96 UALR HOMEWORK CENTER MEETING 4/08/96 PARENT/TEACHER CONFERENCES CONDUCTED 5.11 ID Program Name Primary Leader 4/25/96 5/15/96 5/16/96 000018 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader UALR HOMEWORK CENTER MEETING TITLE 1 MONITORING VISIT TITLE I MONITORING BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5/16/96 SAT-8 TEST DATA Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date 6/12/96 6/12/96 QUARTERLY MONITORING REPORTS QUARTERLY DISCIPLINE MANAGEMENT REPORT 000019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/22/96 COE STATE DEPT MONITORING COMMITTEE 000027 GIBBS MAGNET SCHOOL 4/16/96 4/24/96 MAGNET SCHOOL EVALUATION (ONSITE EVALUATION) COE TEAM VISIT 5/07/96 5/08/96 SHOW AND TELL RECRUITMENT INTERIM REPORTS 000032 DODD ELEMENTARY 4/11/96 STUDEND ACHIEVEMENT ADDRESSED IN MONTHLY GRADE MTG 000033 MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/29/96 SED MONITORED SCHOOL'S COE PLAN/PROGRAM 000040 ROMINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/03/96 TEACHERS COMPILED 000043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 32 5/28/96 5/28/96 QUARTILE SHEETS GIVEN TO TEACHERS TO RECORD SPRING TEST SCORES 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 ON 2/29/96, DIST. BIRACIAL COM. VISITED SCHOOL 5.12ID Program Name Primary Leader 4/01/96 000048 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date ON 3/5/96, SCHOOL RECEIVED BIR. COM. REPORT FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/10/96 SPRING SAT-8 SCORES, RETENTION LISTS, CLASSROOM QU 6/10/96 REPORTS REVIEWED 000463 Equity Monitoring Asst Supts Principals LR 38 4/29/92 000003 MANN MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET 4/01/96 ASST. PRINCIPALS-WEEKLY 000005 PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/10/96 4/16/96 COE COMM. MTGS.,REPORTS, ARCH. DATA DATA GATHERING ON EQUITY FOR MRC EVAL. COMM. VISIT MRC EVAL. COMM. FROM ASU AT PV 4/17/96 5/01/96 MRC EVAL. COMM. FROM ASU AT PV ADM., REGISTRAR REVIEW AND PREP. 96-97 MASTER SCH. 000006 BOOKER MAGNET SCHOOL Report Datet Paget Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 33 Achieve Equity in Class Structure by Grade/Subject 6/03/96 CLASS ASSIGNMENTS MADE TO REFLECT EQUITY DAILY 000008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL 4/02/96 EQUITY INSERVICE 000010 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 4/01/96 REVIEW OF SCHEDULE 000012 MCCLELLAN COMMUNITY HIGH 4/01/96 GRADE DIST. REPORT REVIEWED WITH STAFF 000015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4/10/96 4/10/96 COMPUTER RATIO BALANCE BY RACE/GENDER REGISTRAR MONITORS DATA ENTRY INPUT 000016 MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4/24/96 MASTER SCHEDULE DEVELOPMENT, MEETING WITH REGISTRA 5.13ID Program Name Primary Leader 000018 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Date I Pagel Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 34 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 EQUITABLE CLASSROOM ASSIGNMENTS. MONITOR ADDITIONAL CLASSROOM ASSIGNMENTS. UPDATE SCHOOL PROFILE. 000027 GIBBS MAGNET SCHOOL 4/17/96 6/07/96 ORIGINAL MAGNET SCHOOL EVALUATION DISCIPLINE REPORT 000030 JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 NEW STUDENTS ASSIGNED TO CLASSES WITH REGARD TO RACE ABD GENDER 000032 DODD ELEMENTARY 4/01/96 MONITORING REPORTS ARE REVIEWED QUARTERLY. 000033 MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/04/96 MADE TENATIVE CLASS ROLLS FOR COMING YEAR 000043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 6/04/96 RACIAL EQUITY MAINTAINED 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/05/96 4/05/96 4/05/96 5/13/96 5/13/96 PRINCIPAL REVIEWED RACIAL/GENDER SPREADSHEET EACH TIME A NEW STUDENT ENROLLED, PRIOR TO ASSIGNING THE STUDENT TO A CLASS, IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION OF STUDENTS IN CLASSROOMS PRINCIPAL DISCUSSED RACIAL/GENDER COMPOSITION OF G/T CLASSES AND OF REFERRALS WITH G/T SPECIALIST AND COUNSELOR PRINCIPAL ARRANGED STAFF INSERVICE BY MABEL DONALDSON IN MULTIPLE CRITIERIA FOR IDENTIFICATION 5.14ID Progreun Name Primary Leader 5/13/96 5/13/96 000048 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date OF POTENTIALLY GIFTED CHILDREN TO ACHIEVE EQUITY IN REFERRALS TO G/T PROGRAM FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/03/96 AS NEW STUDENTS ENROLL, CLASSES REVIEWED TO 6/03/96 DETERMINE PLACEMENT 6/10/96 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT FOR 96-97 REVIEWED 000464 Equity Monitoring Asst Supts Principals LR 38 4/29/92 000003 HANN MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET Report Dates Pages Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 35 Review Class Ratios by Subject/Class/Teacher on Se 4/01/96 ASST. PRINCIPAL MEETING-WEEKLY 000005 PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 4/01/96 5/01/96 ONGOING PREP. OF CLASS RATIOS FOR COE PRELIM. PREP 96-97 MASTER SCH. 000006 BOOKER MAGNET SCHOOL 6/03/96 CLASS ASSIGNMENTS REVIEWED TO ASSESS EQUITY 000007 DUNBAR MAGNET JR. HIGH 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 SCHL WIDE SCRNG OF MIN BY GT COORDNTR IS ON GOING AFTER SCHL TUTORING BY MTH DEPT ADMN MNTR CLASSES 4/01/96 SECME 4/01/96 FUTURE BOBCATS 000012 MCCLELLAN COMMUNITY HIGH 4/01/96 GRADE DIST. REPORT REVIEWED WITH STAFF 000016 MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4/24/96 MASTER SCHEUDULE DEVELOPMENT,MEETING WITH REGISTRA 000033 MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/03/96 MONITORING OF RATIOS COMPLETED FOR SCHOOL YEAR 5.15ID Program Name Primary Leader 000043 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL Legal Reference DOC DOC ixx: Page Date Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 36 6/04/96 6/04/96 NO NEW STRATEGIES IMPLEMENTED THIS QUARTER- RACIAL BALANCE MAINTAINED 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 BY 10/18/95, PRINCIPAL HAD DEVELOPED SYSTEM FOR MONITOR. ACHIEVE. OF STDNTS. BY RACE/GENDER ON A QUARTERLY BASIS: GRADE BOOKS, MONITORING REPORTS, CLASS PROFILES WERE COMPLTED IN RACE/GENDER CATEG. SEE ACHIEVEMENTS UNDER 000463 000048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/03/96 INFO. REVIEWED QUARTERLY AND INSERTED IN PROFILE 000465 Equity Monitoring Asst Supts Principals LR 38 4/29/92 Address Disparities with Intervention Activities 000003 MANN MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET 4/01/96 4/01/96 SUPPORT GROUPS ONGOING EARLY MORNING TUTORING ONGOING 000005 PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 ONGOING REMED. CLASSES, UALR TUTORING, PEER TUTOR ONGOING USE COMPUTER LAB 000006 BOOKER MAGNET SCHOOL 6/03/96 INTERVENTION ACTIVITIES UTILIZED DAILY 000007 DUNBAR MAGNET JR. HIGH 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 AFT SCHL TUTORING BY MTH DEPT ADMN MNTR CLASSES SECME TEAM FUTURE BOBCATS COE CMTTEE ADDRES DSPRTIES 5.16ID Program Name Primary Leader 4/01/96 LAP CLASSES LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date 4/01/96 HATH PLUS CLASSES 4/01/96 TITLE I SCHL PLN IN PLACE 4/01/96 MENTORING PGM 4/01/96 TUESDAY HORNING SEHNRS 4/01/96 SAT SCHL 6/13/96 HTG W/RACIAL DIV CHSN TO PLN FOR 96-97 000008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL 4/02/96 EQUITY INSERVICE 000009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 5/01/96 HORNING TUTORING 11/01/95 - 5/1/96 000010 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 4/01/96 TEAHS HEETINGS 4/01/96 COE PLAN 4/01/96 DEPARTHENTAL MEETINGS 000012 MCCLELLAN COMMUNITY HIGH 6/05/96 STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS 000015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4/08/96 ONGOING TEAM MEETINGS 4/09/96 ONGOING STEERING COMMITTEE MEETINGS/FACULTY MEETIN 4/10/96 COE PLAN ADDRESSES SPECIFIC STRATEGIES 000016 MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4/05/96 REVIEWED COE PLAN, ONGOING 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 DHS MENTORING PROGRAM ON GOING 4/05/96 UALR MEETING WITH STAFF ON STUDENT TEACHERS 5.17 Report Datet Page: Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 37 ID Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Report Datei Pagel 8/20/96 38 Abbreviated Text Page Date 5/07/96 5/07/96 5/13/96 UALR ARTISTIC INTERVENTION CULMINATING ACTIVITIES WITH 4TH GRADE ARKANSAS BALLET TRAINING PROGRAM STH GRADE 000027 GIBBS MAGNET SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/16/96 4/16/96 4/24/96 SMALL GROUP COUNSELING EQUITY MONITORING ORIGINAL MAGNET SCHOOL EVALUATION COE (COMPREHENSIVE OUTCOMES EVALUATION) 000030 JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 TITLE READING AND MATH. WRITING TO READ K/1. WRITING TO WRITE GRADE 2. PARENT TUTORING \"RIGHT DIRECTION\". PEER TUTORING. SECME. EXTENDED DAY PROGRAM - GRADES 1-3, 000031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY 5/27/96 REVIEW OF TEST DATA 000032 DODD ELEMENTARY 4/01/96 4/01/96 DISCOVERY AWARENESS \u0026amp; RESOLUTION ACTIVITIES. PEER HELPERS AND STAFF TUTORS. 000033 MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/03/96 MONITORING OF DISKPARITIES COMPLETED FOR YEAR 000035 M.L. KING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/08/96 4/08/96 ALL STUDENTS PARTICIPATED IN \"GO FOR THE GOLD\" READING INCENTIVE PROGRAM 5.18ID Program Name Primary Leader 000043 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 6/04/96 NO DISPARITIES EXIST AT THIS TIME 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 5/06/96 5/06/96 5/06/96 5/09/96 5/09/96 5/09/96 5/30/96 5/30/96 000048 Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date PRINCIPAL MET WITH STAFF TO DISCUSS STRATEGIES TO DE USED NEXT YEAR TO ADDRESS DISPARITIES IN ACHIEVEMENT AND TO DISCUSS DRAFT OF TITLE I APP. PRINCIPAL MET WITH PARENTS TO DISCUSS STRATEGIES TO BE USED NEXT YEAR TO ADDRESS DISPARITIES IN ACHIEVEMENT AND TO DISCUSS DRAFT OF TITLE I APP. PRINCIPAL MET WITH STAFF AND PARENTS TO FINALIZE PLANS TO ADDRESS DISPARITIES FOR NEXT YEAR FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/03/96 ADJUSTMENTS MADE AS STUDENTS ENROLL 000466 Equity Monitoring Asst Supts Principals LR 38 4/29/92 000001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL 4/30/96 HONORS CONVOCATION 000003 MANN MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET 4/01/96 TENNIS UNIFORMS 000005 PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/09/96 LETTERS TO JR. HIGHS ENCOURAGING APPLICANTS ORG. MTG. SPIRIT GROUPS - PARENTS/STUDENTS/SPONSOR 5/01/96 5/01/96 TRYOUTS AND CLINICS FOR CHRLDR, DRILL TEAM TRYOUTS FOR CHOIRS, BANDS, ORCH. ALL PERF. GROUP 000006 BOOKER MAGNET SCHOOL 6/03/96 BARRIERS REMOVED 000007 DUNBAR MAGNET JR. HIGH 4/01/96 FNDNG PRVDED TO NEEDY STDNTS FRO PRTCPTN 5.19 Report Date: Paget Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 39 Remove Address Barriers To Equitable Participation ID Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Report Date I Page: 8/20/96 40 Abbreviated Text Page Date 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 FNDNG FOR TRANS(ATH, SPIRIT GROUPS, BAND UNFRM FOR PROPR CLTHNG PRVDED FOR STDNT PRTCPTN CNSLR TKS STDNTS SHPNG FOR CLOTHES-UNITED WAY 000010 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 4/01/96 SECME SERVICE LEARNING 000015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4/10/96 5/16/96 ONGOING DAILY ANNOUNCEMENTS/BULLETINS LRSD PAYS FOR EXTRACURRICULAR UNIFORMS FOR SPORTS 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 REFER TO SCHOOL PROFILE 000030 JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 COUNSELOR'S SMALL GROUPS. TEACHERS' ENCOURAGEMENT. ADMINISTORS RECOMMENDATIONS. 000032 DODD ELEMENTARY 4/01/96 4/01/96 SHURLEY METHOD, OPEN COURT PHONICS, TITLE I PHONIC TITLE I PROGRAM, EPSF, ETC., RESOURCE, SPEECH, 000033 MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/03/96 6/03/96 MONITORING OF EQUITABLE PARTICIPATION COMPLETED SCHOOL YEAR FO 000043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 6/04/96 NO BARRIERS EVIDENT AT THIS TIME 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 SEE ACHIEVEMENTS UNDER 000401 SEE ACHIEVEMENTS UNDER 000405 5.20ID Program Name Primary Leader 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 000048 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader SEE ACHIEVEMENTS UNDER 000463 Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Datet Page: Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 41 SEE ACHIEVEMENTS UNDER 000465 BEGINNING ON 1/22/96, BUS TRANSPORTATION WAS PROVIDED FOR STUDENTS WHO NEEDED A RIDE AFTER EXTENDED-DAY PROGRAM BEGINNING IN THE LAST WEEK OF SEPTEMBER, TEACHERS CONFERRED WITH PARENTS ABOUT THE STRENGTHS AND NEEDS OF THEIR CHILDREN IN ORDER TO PARTNER WITH PARENTS IN PLANNING FOR PROGRESS OF CHILDREN FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/03/96 STRATEGIES IN PLACE TO ADDRESS DISP. IN G/T 000467 Equity Monitoring Asst Supts Principals LR 38 4/29/92 Achieve Equity in Teaching Methods 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 4/17/96 5/15/96 EARLY DISMISSAL STAFF DEVELOPMENT EARLY DISMISSAL STAFF DEVELOPMENT 000005 PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 ADM. OBS. OF TEACHERS CLASS METHODS ADM. POST CONF. WITH TEACHERS ADM. FINAL APPRAISAL CONF. WITH TCHRS. 000006 BOOKER MAGNET SCHOOL 6/03/96 CLINICAL SUPERVISION UTILIZED DAILY TO MONITOR 000007 DUNBAR MAGNET JR. HIGH 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 UPS DVLPD BY EACH TCHR TCHR OBSRVTNS RVW OF TCHR LSN PLNS TCHR/STDNT/PRNT/ADMN DVLP lEPS FOR SPCL STDNTS 000008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL 4/02/96 EQUITY INSERVICE 5.21 ID Program Name Primary Leader 000009 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIGH Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Date) Page I Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 42 4/17/96 5/15/96 INCLUSIONARY EDUCATION APRIL 17, 1996 EARLY DISMISSAL BY DEPT. DISTRICT WIDE 000010 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 4/01/96 EMPHASIS ON MIDDLE LEVEL ANAYSIS 000015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4/05/96 4/05/96 ONGOING MONITORING OF CLASSROOMS TEACHER EVALUATIONS (ONGOING) 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5/21/96 6/03/96 ABACUS EVALUATION MEETING TEST ANALYSIS MEETING 000024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5/17/96 LIBRARIAN TAUGHT UNIT ON FOLKTALES TO 2ND GRADE 000027 GIBBS MAGNET SCHOOL 4/03/96 4/04/96 4/05/96 4/09/96 4/13/96 4/16/96 4/17/96 4/24/96 4/30/96 SCHOOL LAW STANFORD 8 INSERVICE STRATEGIC PLANNING TRAINER OF TRAINERS AFLIA STATEWIDE POLICY SUMMIT GOVERNOR'S CONFERENCE ON SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT COE COE PROCESS MEDIA INSERVICE 000030 JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/05/96 4/17/96 INSERVICE SUCCEEDING WITH DIFFICULT STUDENTS. RACIAL AND CULTURAL DIVERSITY. S.22ID Program Name Primary Leader 000037 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY 5/03/96 TEACHER OBSERVATIONS COMPLETE 000043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 4/17/96 K-4 INSERVICE ON INCLUSION Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date 5/15/96 K-4 INSERVICE ON MATH/SCIENCE TECHNIQUES 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 BY 10/18/95, PRINCIPAL DEVELOPED SYSTEMS FOR MONITORING ACHIEVEMENT BY RACE AND GENDER ON A QUARTERLY BASIS: GRADE BOOKS, MONITORING REPORTS, CLASS PROFILES WERE COMPLETED IN RACE/ Report Datei Page: Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 43 4/01/96 5/06/96 5/06/96 GENDER CATEGORIES PRINCIPAL MET WITH STAFF TO DISCUSS STRATEGIES TO BE USED NEXT YEAR TO ADDRESS DISPARITIES IN 5/06/96 ACHIEVEMENT AND TO DISCUSS DRAFT OF TITLE I APP. 5/09/96 PRINCIPAL MET WITH PARENTS TO DISCUSS STRATEGIES 5/09/96 TO BE USED NEXT YEAR TO ADDRESS DISPARITIES IN 5/09/96 ACHIEVEMENT AND TO DISCUSS DRAFT OF TITLE I APP. 6/01/96 SEE ACHIEVEMENTS UNDER 455 000046 MABELVALE ELEMENTARY 4/22/96 COE VISIT 4/22 4/26/96 000048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/05/96 REVIEW-STRATEGIC PLAN VIA CABLE CHANNEL 4 4/05/96 STAFF DEV.- SCIENCE CRUSADE 4/17/96 STAFF INSERV.-ECOE REVIEW AND UPDATE 5/06/96 STAFF INSERV.-EQUITY MON. REPORT 000051 WAKEFIELD ELEMENTARY 5/15/96 STAFF COMMITTED TO ADOPT SUCCESS FOR ALL. 5.23 ID Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Page Date 000468 Equity Monitoring Asst Supts Principals LR 38 4/29/92 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL Report Date I Pagel Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 44 Achieve Equity in Student Instructional Practices 4/17/96 5/15/96 EARLY DISMISSAL STAFF DEVELOPMENT EARLY DISMISSAL STAFF DEVELOPMENT 000003 MANN MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET 4/05/96 4/09/96 4/17/96 5/07/96 5/15/96 STAFF DEVELOPMENT DAY FACULTY MEETING EARLY DISMISSAL FACULTY MEETING EARLY DISMISSAL 000005 PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 ON GOING THEACHER OBSERVATIONS PAR./TCHR. CONF. WITH ADM. AND COUNS. COUNS. AND ADM. CONF. WITH STUDENTS 000006 BOOKER MAGNET SCHOOL 6/03/96 CLINICAL SUPERVISION UTILIZED DAILY TO MONITOR 000007 DUNBAR MAGNET JR. HIGH 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 ADMN WRK WITH INDIV TCHRS SCHED OF PRE/CONF, OBS CONF, POST CONF, INFORMAL V STF DVLPMNT PRVDED ON REG BASIS IIPS DVLPD BY EACH TCHR TCHR OBSRVTNS RVW OF TCHR LSN PLNS TCHR/STDNT/PRNT/ADMN DVLP lEPS FOR SPCL STDNTS 000008 FAIR HIGH SCHOOL 4/02/96 EQUITY INSERVICE 000009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 5/07/96 SHOW \u0026amp; TELL 5.2 4ID Program Name Primary Leader 5/08/96 SHOW \u0026amp; TELL 000012 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader MCCLELLAN COMMUNITY HIGH Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date Repox. Datex Paget Abbreviated Text B/20/96 45 4/01/96 COE COMMITTEE REVIEW AND UP-DATE PLAN 000015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4/05/96 SEE PREVIOUS ACTIVITY 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5/31/96 CLASSROOM MONITORING REPORTS 000030 JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/05/96 INSERVICE SUCCEEDING WITH DIFFICULT STUDENTS. 4/17/96 RACIAL AND CULTURAL DIVERSITY. 000032 DODD ELEMENTARY 4/01/96 DROP-IN OBSERVATIONS \u0026amp; FORMAL OBSERVATIONS 000033 MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/03/96 MONITORING OF INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICES COMPLETED FO 6/03/96 SCHOOL YEAR 000035 M.L. KING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/03/96 1ST GRADE STUDENTS WALKED TO THE STATE CAPITOL AND 4/03/96 TOURED THE BUILDING 4/03/96 4/03/96 K, 2ND, 3RD, AND STH GRADE STUDENTS ATTENDED HALL HIGH SCHOOL'S PRODUCTION OF \"CINDERELLA\" 4/16/96 STH GRADE STUDENTS VISITED THE ARK. MUSEUM OF 4/16/96 SCIENCE AND NATURAL HISTORY 4/23/96 PRE-K STUDENTS TOURED THE LITTLE ROCK ZOO 4/24/96 ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL PRESENTED A PROGRAM 4/24/96 ON VISITING THE HOSPITAL TO PRE-K STUDENTS 4/24/96 6TH GRADE STUDENTS TOURED THE ARK. MUSEUM OF 5.25 ID Program Name Primary Leader 4/24/96 4/29/96 4/29/96 5/01/96 5/02/96 5/03/96 5/03/96 5/07/96 5/08/96 5/08/96 5/09/96 5/09/96 5/09/96 5/13/96 5/21/96 5/21/96 5/22/96 5/22/96 000043 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date SCIENCE AND NATURAL HISTORY 5TH 6 6TH GRADE STUDENTS PRESENTED AND \"EARTH DAY\" PROGRAM TO THE WHOLE SCHOOL ALL STUDENTS TOURED THE \"FIRE SAFETY HOUSE\" 4TH-6TH GRADE STUDENTS PARTICIPATED IN THE QUIZ BO 5TH grade STUDETNS attended a CHILDREN'S THEATER PRODUCTION AT THE ARKANSAS ARTS CENTER KINDERGARTEN STUDENTS TOURED THE LITTLE ROCK ZOO THE MOBILE DAIRY CLASSROOM VISITED THE SCHOOL FOR ALL STUDENTS 2ND GRADE STUDENTS VISITED THE ARK. MUSEUM OP SCIENCE AND NATURAL HISTORY PRE-K STUDENTS VISITED THE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF AR PRE-K STUDENTS VISITED THE DISCOVERY ZONE PRE-K STUDENTS VISITED THE ARK MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY AND TOURED THE FIRE STATION TITLE I STUDENTS VISITED MID-AMERICA MUSEUM 4TH GRADE STUDENTS TOURED THE ARK. STATE CAPITOL WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 6/04/96 COE STRATEGIES FOLLOWED 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 SEE ACHIEVEMENTS UNDER 455 SEE ACHIEVEMENTS UNDER 467 000048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/03/96 000469 Equity Monitoring INSTRUCTION MONITORED DURING CLASS VISITS AND OBSE Asst Supts Principals LR 38 4/29/92 000003 MANN MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET 4/01/96 GRADE DISTRIBUTION REWIEW -EACH QUARTER 000005 PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 5/17/96 SENIOR FAILURE LISTS 5.26 Report Datei Pagel Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 46 Review Grade Distribution on Semester BasisID Program Name Primary Leader 6/04/96 Report, Date: 8/20/96 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader SOPH/JR. FAIL. LISTS Page: 47 Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date Abbreviated Text 6/05/96 PRIN. EXAM. AND EVAL. OF TCHRS. GRADES ONGOING 000006 BOOKER MAGNET SCHOOL 6/05/96 GRADE DISTRIBUTION REVIEWED 000007 DUNBAR MAGNET JR. HIGH 4/01/96 ADMN RVW GRD DISTB//WRK WITH INDIVIDS 4/01/96 INSERV IN FCLTY MTNGS RE STRATEGIES 000009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 4/23/96 INTERIM REPORTS WENT OUT TO PARENTS 000010 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 4/01/96 GRADE DISTRIBUTION BY PRINCIPALS 000012 MCCLELLAN COMMUNITY HIGH 4/01/96 GRADE DIST. REPORT REVIEWED WITH STAFF 000015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4/10/96 GRADE LEVEL TEAM MEETINGS 4/18/96 MONTHLY DEPARTMENTAL MEETINGS 000016 MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4/08/96 GRADE DISTRIBUTION REVIEWED 4/29/96 INTERIM REPORTS 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/04/96 CLASSROOM GRADE DISTRIBUTION SHEETS REVIEWED BY 6/04/96 PRINCIPAL 000020 MCDERMOTT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/08/96 REVIEW GRADE DISTRIBUTION 5.27ID Program Name Primary Leader 000027 GIBBS MAGNET SCHOOL 6/04/96 6/04/96 000029 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader CLASSROOM MONITORING REPORTS QUARTERLY GRADE DISTRIBUTION FORMS WESTERN HILLS ELEM. SCHOOL 6/07/96 000031 Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date YEARLY GRADE DISTRIBUTION SHEETS EXAMINED CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY 6/01/96 REVIEW GRADE DISTRIBUTION SHEET 000033 MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5/01/96 6/03/96 MONITORED INTERIM REPORTS MONITORED FINAL PROGRESS REPORTS 000037 GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY 4/30/96 4/30/96 INTERM REPORTS MONITORED FOR ACADEMIC PROGRESS OF STUDENTS 000038 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 4/24/96 4/27/96 DISTRIBUTION DATA FOR GRADES 1-6 CONINUE TO REVIEW QUARTERLY GRADE-LEVEL 000040 ROMINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Report Datei Paget Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 48 6/03/96 6/03/96 CLASSROOM MONITORING SHEETS COMPLETED FOR THE FOURTH NINE WEEKS. 000043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 6/04/96 YEARLY QUARTILE SHEETS COMPLETED BY CLASSROOM TCHR 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 BY 10/18/95, PRIN. DEVELOPED SYSTEMS FOR MONITORING ACHIEVEMENT OF STUDENTS BY RACE AND GENDER ON B.2BID Program Name Primary Leader 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 000046 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date A QUARTERLY BASIS BY REFERENCE TO GRADE BOOKS, MONITORING REPORTS, AND CLASS PROFILES WHEREIN DATA WAS POSTED IN RACIAL/GENDER GROUPS AS DIRECTED AND EXPLAINED BY THE PRINCIPAL BEGINNING ON 10/18/95, PRIN. SENT REPORTS WITH PROG. REPT. GRADES TO ASST. SUPT. QUARTERLY BEGINNING ON 10/18/95, TEACHERS PREPARED QUARTERLY REPORTS WITH STDENTS LISTED BY RACE/GENDER BY 10/18/95, TEACHERS ARRANGED STUDENTS NAMES IN GRADE BOOKS IN RACIAL/GENDER CATEGORIES FOR EASY REVIEW OF EQUITY IN GRADE DISTRIBUTION MABELVALE ELEMENTARY 6/04/96 REVIEW GRADE DISTRIBUTION 000048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/10/96 GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS REVIEWED 000952 Equity Monitoring Assoc Supt Dir PRE co 1 8/26/93 000071 EVALUATION \u0026amp; TESTING DEPT. 4/01/96 4/01/96 PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL SUBMITTED MONTHLY DURING THE FOURTH QUARTER (APRIL, MAY, JUNE). Report Datet Paget Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 49 Submit project management tool to the couxrt each m 001074 Equity Monitoring 001146 Equity Monitoring 001147 Equity Monitoring 001148 Equity Monitoring 001151 Equity Monitoring 001152 Equity Monitoring 001153 Equity Monitoring Assoc Assoc Assoc Assoc Assoc Assoc Assoc Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Dir PRE Dir PRE Dir PRE Dir PRE Dir PRE Dir PRE Dir PRE LR LR LR LR LR LR LR 129 224 225 225 224 224 224 000071 EVALUATION \u0026amp; TESTING DEPT. 5/01/96 5/01/96 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 PRE MONITORS BEGAN COMPILING DATA IN PREPARATION O SPRING 96 INCENTIVE SCHOOL MONITORING REPORT, 5.29 Score, Collect, Store, and Report Test Scores Conduct monitoring w/Local Biracial Committees Design reporting forms Select Team Members Establish Monitoring Schedule Conduct Site Visits Prepare/Distribute Semi-Annual Monitoring ReportsID Program Name Primary Leader 5/01/96 5/01/96 5/01/96 001154 Equity Monitoring 001156 Equity Monitoring 001157 Equity Monitoring 001159 Equity Monitoring Assoc Assoc Assoc Assoc 000071 5/01/96 5/01/96 001160 Equity Monitoring 000071 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date SCHOOL CLIMATE REPORT, SPRING EQUITY MONITORING REPORT, AND HENDERSON AND PARKVIEW MAGNET MCCLELLAN PROGRAM REPORTS. Supt Supt Supt Supt Dir PRE Dir PRE Dir PRE Dir PRE LR LR LR LR 225 225 225 224 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 EVALUATION \u0026amp; TESTING DEPT. Assoc PRE BEGAN COMPILING DATA FOR REPORTS FALL 95 STANPORD-8 REPORT SUBMITTED : Supt Dir PRE EVALUATION \u0026amp; TESTING DEPT. 4/01/96 4/01/96 001161 Equity Monitoring 001162 Equity Monitoring 003148 Equity Monitoring EQUITY MONITORING TEAM CONSENSUS TO PRINCIPALS AND ASST' SUPT'S. TO SUPT. LR 225 4/29/92 Assoc Assoc Supt Supt Asst Supts Dir PRE Dir PRE Principals 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/25/96 000020 REPORTS SENT LR LR I 225 225 6 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 STAFF YEARLY APPRAISALS SUBMITTED TO HUMAN RESOURC MCDERMOTT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/08/96 EVALUATE ALL CERTIFIED/CLASSIFIED PERSONNEL 000030 JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5/31/96 TEACHER OBSERVATIONS AND VISITS COMPLETED 000033 6/03/96 MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PRINCIPAL COMPLETED EVALUATION OF ALL PERSONNEL 000043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 6/04/96 PERSONNEL EVALUATIONS COMPLETED BY PRINCIPAL AND S. 30 Report Date: Paget Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 50 Conduct qtr. monitoring visit by District-wide Bir Submit revisions to LRSD Board/Joshua Intervenors Present unresolved revisions to the Court Prepare Semester Reports for Superintendent Distribute Copies of Reports Improve Educational Equity in All Schools Develop and implement corrective strategies Eval. effectiveness of all personnel and programsID Program Name Primary Leader 6/04/96 KEPT ON FILE LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 000046 Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date PRINCIPAL MADE ALL RECORDS AVAILABLE FOR MONI-TORS TO FACILITATE EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF ALL PERSONNEL AND PROGRAMS MABELVALE ELEMENTARY 6/04/96 ALL EVALUATIONS COMPLETED 000048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5/24/96 TEACHER OBSERVATIONS COMPLETED 6/04/96 ALL STAFF MEMBER EVALUATIONS COMPLETED 000051 WAKEFIELD ELEMENTARY Report Dates Page: Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 51 4/20/96 THE PRINCIPAL SUBMITTED APPRAISALS FOR ALL OF 4/20/96 WAKEFIELD STAFF. 000116 THE ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 5/06/96 BIRACIAL VISIT REPORT EVALUATED 5/06/96 REVIEW OF EVALUATION REPORT 003149 Equity Monitoring 003201 Equity Monitoring Assoc Supt Dir PRE I 6 4/29/92 Bd of Directors Supt CO 1 6/17/93 Parties to deter, effect, of each dist.'s implemen Court requires each member of Bd. of Dir. to atten 5.31 LRSD FY /96 Program Budget Document Report Date: Page: 8/20/96 52 Program Name: Program Code: Ex-Curr Partcipation 07 Primary Leader: Program Description: THE PURPOSE OF THIS PROGRAM IS Asst Supts Secondary Leader: FY Program Budget: YTD Expenditures: PATE IN THE VARIOUS SCHOOL ACTIVITES. TO ENSURE THAT ALL STUDENTS HAVE AN Principals I EQUITABLE OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICI- $82,400.00 1st Qtr Expend: $.00 3rd Qtr Expend: $9,717.50 FTE: .00 $74,621.66 2nd Qtr Expend: $63,281.52 4th Qtr Expend: $1,622.64 %Budget Spent: 90.56 % 6.1ID Program Name Primary Leader 000473 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst Supts 000001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL 4/03/96 4/04/96 4/04/96 4/09/96 4/17/96 4/23/96 4/24/96 4/25/96 4/30/96 5/08/96 5/21/96 000005 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Principals L.O.V.E. ASSEMBLY SECME EXTRAVAGANZA NATIONAL HONOR SOCIETY INDUCTION REGULAR SCHEDULED CLUB MEETINGS PUNT, PASS, KICK CONTEST BAND, ORCHESTRA CONCERT BETA CLUB INDUCTION SPRING CHORAL CONCERT REGULAR SCHEDULED CLUB MEETINGS MED FLIGHT PRESENTATION PROJECT GRADUATION PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 4/01/96 5/01/96 5/07/96 000006 Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date LR 39 4/29/92 INTERCOM, CH. 1 DAILY ANNOUNCEMENTS PIANNING AND REVISION STUD. HDBKS FOR 96-97 FINAL PTSA MTG./SUMMARY REPORTS BOOKER MAGNET SCHOOL 4/01/96 CALENDAR OF EVENTS SENT HOME 5/01/96 6/03/96 CALENDAR OF EVENTS SENT HOME DAILY ANNOUNCEMENTS MADE 000007 DUNBAR MAGNET JR. HIGH 4/01/96 POSTERS 4/01/96 4/01/96 PTA NEWSLETTER SCHL NEWSPAPER PUB QUARTERLY 000009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 4/29/96 5/03/96 CHOIR LETTERS NEWSLETTER 6.2 Report Date t Paget Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 53 Inform All Students/Patrons of Co-Curricular/Extra ID Program Name Primary Leader 5/13/96 000010 4/01/96 000012 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date SPRING CONCERT 5/14/96 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR. HIGH BULLETINS Report DateI Paget Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 54 4/08/96 4/15/96 4/20/96 4/23/96 4/25/96 5/06/96 6/08/96 MCCLELLAN COMMUNITY HIGH REPORT CARDS SENT high school proficiency test SENIOR CITIZEN HEALTH FAIR INTERIM REPORTS PARENTS NIGHT OUT HONORS NIGHT HEALTHY FAMILY CELEBRATION 000015 4/05/96 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL DAILY ANNOUNCEMENTS/BULLETIN (ONGOING) 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 MONTHLY CALENDARS, PARENT NEWSLETTER AND OTHER PARENTAL COMMUNICATIONS 000018 4/01/96 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PARENT NEWSLETTER AND CALENDAR. 000030 4/01/96 4/01/96 JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL COUNSELOR SMALL GROUPS. ADMINISTRATORS' RECOMMENDATIONS. 000033 MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY 6/03/96 SCHOOL PROVIDED PARENTS SUMMER ACTIVITY LIST 000043 6/04/96 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL DISPARITY STRATEGIES IN COE FOLLOWED  . 3ID Program Name Primary Leader 000045 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Dates Page: Abbreviated Text a/20/96 55 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 BEGINNING IN SEPTEMBER, TWO PARENTS SENT INFORMATION HOME WITH ALL GIRLS ABOUT A BROWNIE SCOUT TROUP\n20 GIRLS MET WEEKLY ALL YEAR ON 10/31/95, COUSELOR EXPLAINED PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS FOR \"PEER HELPERS\" ON 10/23/95, COUNSELOR EXPLAINED PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS FOR RED RIBBON PARADE ON 11/9/95, COUNSELOR MET WITH PEER HELFERS TO SELECT FOUR PARTICIPANTS FOR RETREAT 000048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5/27/96 6/03/96 6/03/96 6/03/96 000474 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst INFO SENT TO 6TH GRADE STUDENTS ABOUT ATHLETIC PHY INFORMATION SENT TO PARENTS VIA \"PARENT PAGE\" BROCHURES, ETC. MADE AVAILABLE TO PARENTS AND STUDENTS OF INFO. REC'D FROM OUTSIDE AGENCIES Supts Principals LR 39 4/29/92 Use Media /Press to Inform 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 5/12/96 6/16/96 ADS PLACED IN ARK. DEMOCRAT/GAZETTE ADS PLACED IN ARK. DEMOCRAT/GAZETTE 000003 MANN MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET 4/08/96 NEWSPAPER ARTICLE 000005 PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 ONGOING NEWS RELEASES TO LRSD COMMUN., MRC, CH.4 DEMO-GAZ., AR. TIMES ONGOING PARTNERSHIP BARNES \u0026amp; NOBLE PUBLICITY 000006 BOOKER MAGNET SCHOOL 5/07/96 NOTIFICATION SENT TO COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE 6.4 ID Program Name Primary Leader 5/08/96 5/09/96 5/19/96 000007 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Datei Page I Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 56 NOTIFICATION SENT TO COMMUNICATIONS NOTIFICATION SENT TO COMMUNICATIONS LINKS, INC., CHANNEL 14 BROADCAST OFFICE OFFICE DUNBAR MAGNET JR. HIGH 4/01/96 4/01/96 DIST COMM DEPT STDNT NEWSPAPER 000009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 5/23/96 SCHOOL BOARD MEETINGS - MEET MONTHLY 000016 4/25/96 MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE GLOBE ARTICLE 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 COMMUNICATIONS DEPT. NOTIFICATION EVENT FORMS 000027 GIBBS MAGNET SCHOOL 4/12/96 4/15/96 4/17/96 4/18/96 4/19/96 4/22/96 4/30/96 5/01/96 5/02/96 5/09/96 5/10/96 5/14/96 FRENCH STUDENT ARRIVAL FRENCH STUDENTS TO LITTLE ROCK FRENCH STUDENTS TO STATE CAPITOL ZOO AND MUSEUM CENTRAL ARKANSAS LIBRARY GROUNDBREAKING EARTH DAY PARADE HONOR ASSEMBLY/OFFICIAL FRENCH CEREMONY 000031 QUIZ BOWL FINALS WILDWOOD OPERA - THREE LITTLE PIGS CINCO DE MAYO FESTIVAL INTERNATIONAL FESTIVAL SALUTE TO VOLUNTEER RECEPTION 5TH/6TH GRADE MUSICAL \"RHYTHMS\" WELCOME CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY 4/01/96 ARK. DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE ARTICLE  . 5ID Program Name Primary Leader 000032 DODD ELEMENTARY 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/26/96 5/03/96 5/09/96 5/17/96 5/18/96 5/24/96 5/30/96 5/30/96 5/30/96 5/31/96 000033 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date ACTIVITIES ARE SENT TO COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY. EDUCATIONAL ENRICHMENT PROVIDED BY FIELD TIRPS: ARK. AEROSPACE EDUCATION GRADES 3 \u0026amp; 6 ACTIVITIES ARE SENT TO COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY. WILDWOOD TOURING OPERA - \"3 LITTLE PIGS\" STEPPING INTO TRUTH DRUG PROGRAM GR. 4-6 SOUTHERN MAID DONUT SHOP GRADE 2 LITTLE ROCK ZOO - GRADES KINDERGARTEN, 1ST \u0026amp; 2ND CAT IN THE HAT DAY MEDIA CENTER LITTLE ROCK NATL. AIRPORT KINDERGARTEN GRADUATION 6TH GRADE CELEBRATION 3RD GRADE PICNIC MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/03/96 000038 GRADE 3 SENT FIVE PRESS RELEASES TO COMMUNICATION DEPT. PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 4/01/96 4/01/96 CONTINUE TO USE MEDIA AND LRSD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE FOR UPCOMING EVENTS 000043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 4/17/96 5/15/96 INSERVICE ON K-4 TECHNIQUES, INCLUSION INSERVICE ON K-4 TECHNIQUES, MATH/SCIENCE 000044 WILSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/17/96 5/21/96 KIND. FIELD TRIP TO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ARK. KIND. FIELD TRIP TO DISCOVERY ZONE 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 MEDIA CENTER MONITOR CLUB GATHERED, ORGANIZED, 6 6.6 Report Date I Paget Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 52ID Program Name Primary Leader 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 000048 6/03/96 6/03/96 000050 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference ixx: DOC DOC Page Date DISPLAYED MEDIA CLIPPINGS ON CURRNT, ON LARGE BULLETIN BOARD OUTSIDE GLOBAL EVENTS MEDIA CENTER BEGINNING IN SEPTEMBER, KEY COMMUNICATOR WROTE CONSISTENTLY INFORMATIVE PRESS RELEASES PRINCIPAL ALWAYS AGREED TO COOPERATE WITH PRESS OR T.V. WHEN THEY WANTED TO FILM OR INTERVIEW FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INFO SENT TO COMM. OFFICE ABOUT EVENTS ARTWORK DISPLAYED S MCDONALDS (PARTNER) OTTER CREEK ELEMENTARY I 4/08/96 4/15/96 4/22/96 4/26/96 4/29/96 5/03/96 5/06/96 5/16/96 5/23/96 5/24/96 5/28/96 5/30/96 000475 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst HONORS ASSEMBLY KINDERGARTEN - FIELD TRIP BAPTIST HOSPITAL RAIN FOREST - SELLING RAIN FOREST CRUNCH DR. BEVANS VISIT TO THE SCHOOL - DENTIST FIELD TRIP - STH GRADE STATE CAPITAL \u0026amp; RESTORATION KINDERGARTEN FIELD TRIP - PINNACLE MTN THIRD GRADE - CINCO DE MAYO FESTIVAL PTA MEETING - STUDENT ART WORK - 6TH GRADE OVERNIGHT TRIP TO 4-H CENTER KINDERGARETEN - PICNIC AT PAVILLION GUEST SPEAKER FROM AUSTRALIA - 4TH GRADE 6TH GRADE PROGRAM STH \u0026amp; STH GRADE STUDENT PERFORMING - Supts FOLLIES 000003 Principals LR 39 4/29/92 MANN MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET 4/01/96 4/01/96 5/01/96 5/01/96 DANCE PERFORMANCE LETTERS PIANO, ORCHESTRA, BAND, CHORAL LETTERS HONOR'S CONVOCATION LETTERS SCIENCE TRIP (ALABAMA) 000004 4/09/96 METRO VO-TECH/EDUC. CENTER METROPOLITAN NEWSPAPER (THE CONNECTION) Report Datez Pagel Abbreviated Text Send Printed Info to Parents 8/20/96 58 e. 7ID Program Name Primary Leader 000005 PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Date t Paget Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 59 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 6/05/96 ATTENDANCE LETTERS TO PARENTS ONGOING ADM. SENT HOME/SUSP. LETTERS TO PARENTS COUNS. SCHOLARSHIP REC. LETTERS COUNS. FAILURE AND SUMMER SCHOOL LETTERS TO PARENT 000006 BOOKER MAGNET SCHOOL 4/01/96 5/01/96 5/29/96 CALENDAR OF EVENTS SENT HOME CALENDAR OF EVENTS SENT HOME NEWSLETTER SENT HOME 000007 DUNBAR MAGNET JR. HIGH 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 FLIERS PTA NEWSLETTER MNTHLY CLNDR MAILED HOME 000009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIGH I I 5/01/96 5/01/96 NEWSLETTERS 9/12,10/1, 11/1, 12/1/95\n2/1,3/1,4/1, 000010 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 4/01/96 PTA NEWSLETTERS I 000012 MCCLELLAN COMMUNITY HIGH 4/08/96 4/20/96 4/23/96 4/25/96 6/14/96 REPORT CARDS SENT SENIOR CITIZEN HEALTH FAIR INTERIM REPORT DIST. PARENTS NIGHT OUT REPORT CARDS SENT 000015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4/08/96 ONGOING PRINTED COMMUNICATION IS SENT TO PARENTS 6.8ID Program Name Primary Leader 000016 4/08/96 000017 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference EXX: DOC DOC Page Date MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL REPORT CARDS t I Report Date: Paget Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 60 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/12/96 4/12/96 4/26/96 5/10/96 5/10/96 5/17/96 5/17/96 5/24/96 000018 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 000030 MONTHLY CALENDARS, NEWSLETTER AND OTHER PARENTAL COMMUNICATIONS FLYERS ON SCHOOL ACTIVITIES FLYERS ON SCHOOL ACTIVITES FLYERS ON SCHOOL ACTIVITIES BASELINE NEWSLETTER FLYERS ON SCHOOL ACTIVITIES FRIDAY FAX\" FLYERS ON SCHOOL ACTIVITIES FLYERS ON SCHOOL ACTIVITIES BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PARENT NEWSLETTER AND CALENDAR. INTERIM REPORTS. PARENT/TEACHER CONFERENCES. 4/01/96 4/01/96 5/01/96 5/01/96 000031 JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PRINCIPAL'S NEWSLETTER SENT. TEACHERS NEWSLETTERS SENT, PRINCIPAL'S NEWSLETTER SENT. TEACHERS' NEWSLETTERS SENT. CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY 4/03/96 4/11/96 4/17/96 4/22/96 5/01/96 PIZZA PARTY - CITIZENSHIP PARTNERSHIP CONCERT MATH CONVENTION INTERNATIONAL READING ASSOCIATION AWARDS ASSEMBLY 6.9ID Program Name Primary Leader 5/02/96 5/04/96 COTILLION GT OPEN HOUSE LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date 5/10/96 PRE-K PROGRAM 5/17/96 BASKETBALL GAME W/BATES ELEM 5/23/96 5/23/96 6TH GRADE PROMOTIONAL CEREMONY FIELD DAY 000032 DODD ELEMENTARY 4/01/96 MONTHLY CALENDAR \u0026amp; NEWSLETTER SENT \u0026amp; PHONE CALLS 000033 MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/03/96 COMPLETED NEWSLETTERS TO PARENTS 000038 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 4/04/96 4/04/96 4/04/96 A WEEKLY NEWSLETTER \"THURSDAY EXPRESS\" IS SENT TO PARENTS WEEKLY APPRISING THEM OF ALL EXTRA CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES. 000043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL Report Date I Paget Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 61 6/04/96 MONTHLY NEWSLETTERS/INFORMATIONAL BULLETINS CONTIN 000044 WILSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/21/96 4/24/96 PERMISSION FORM FOR QUIZ BOWL LETTERS ABOUT BOOK FAIR \u0026amp; STORYTELLING FESTIVAL 4/25/96 5/22/96 LETTERS ABOUT SPAGHETTI DINNER \u0026amp; STORYTELLERS MEMO ABOUT KINDERGARTEN PROGRAM 5/28/96 MEMO TO PARENTS-FIELD DAY INFO. 1ST 6TH GRADES 5/31/96 5/31/96 MEMO TO PARENTS-FIELD DAY INFO. PRE-K \u0026amp; KIND. MEMO ABOUT 6TH GRADE CEREMONY 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 PRINCIPAL PREPARED \u0026amp; DISTRIBUTED PARENT HANDBOOK TO EVERY FAMILY WHO REGISTERED CHILDREN AT WOOD. 6.10ID Program Name Primary Leader 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 000046 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date beginning in SEPTEMBER, PRINCIPAL SENT NUMBERED NEWSLETTERS, \"WOODRUFF GAZETTE,\" CALLY  AT LEAST MONTHLY HOME PERIODIMABELVALE ELEMENTARY 4/01/96 4/01/96 5/01/96 5/01/96 NEWSLETTERS TO PARENTS APRIL NEWSLETTERS NEWSLETTERS TO PARENTS may NEWSLETTERS 000048 5/30/96 6/03/96 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SUMMER ACTIVITIES CALENDARS \"PARENT PAGE- NEWSLETTERS SENT SENT HOME 000050 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 000476 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst OTTER CREEK ELEMENTARY MONTHLY NEWSLETTER PERIODIC MEMOS TEACHER MEMOS FIELD TRIP PERMISSION SLIPS INTERIM REPORTS PARENT/TEACHER CONFERENCES Supts Principals LR 39 4/29/92 000001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL 6/03/96 DAILY BULLETIN AND INTERCOM 2 TIMES DAILY-AM/PM 000003 5/01/96 5/07/96 MANN MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET FOOTLOCKER VIDEO OFFICER GRAY'S PRESENTATION ON VIOLENCE 000005 PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 ONGOING INTERCOM, CH. 1 ANNOUNCEMENTS DAILY FILMING OF SPEC. EVENTS - SHOWING VIA CH. 1 .11 Report Date) Paget Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 62 Make Clear Public Address System Announcements toID Program Name Primary Leader 000006 BOOKER MAGNET SCHOOL 6/03/96 000007 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader DAILY ANNOUNCEMENT MADE DUNBAR MAGNET JR. HIGH 4/01/96 4/01/96 DAILY ANNCMNTS INTERCOM WORKING 000012 MCCLELLAN COMMUNITY HIGH 4/01/96 4/01/96 USE OF CHANNEL ONE COUNSELOR/SCHOOL ANNOUNCEMENTS 000015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4/08/96 4/08/96 000017 Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Datet Paget Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 63 ONGOING DAILY ANNOUNCEMENTS VIA THE SCHOOL INTERCOM SYSTEM BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 5/01/96 5/30/96 5/30/96 DAILY MORNING AND AFTERNOON ANNOUNCEMENTS DAILY ANNOUNCEMENT ON INTERCOM AWARDS ASSEMBLY EACH NINE WEEKS SIXTH GRADE PROGRAM 000018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 MORNING AND AFTERNOON ANNOUNCEMENTS. 000027 GIBBS MAGNET SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/09/96 4/19/96 4/22/96 DAILY ANNOUNCEMENTS INTERNATIONAL FESTIVAL EARTH DAY PARADE HONOR ASSEMBLY 000030 JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 DAILY ANNOUNCEMENTS MADE. 6.12ID Program Name Primary Leader 000032 DODD ELEMENTARY 4/01/96 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date morning announcements CONDUCTED DAILY BY STUDENTS. 000033 MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY 6/03/96 SCHOOL ANNOUNCEMENTS COMPLETED FOR SCHOOL YEAR. 000043 6/04/96 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL WHS NEWS CONTINUED 000045 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL PRINCIPAL \u0026amp; COUNSELOR RARELY STAFF BULLETINS CONTAINED THAT TEACHERS READ TO THEM USED P.A. SYSTEM\nINFO. FOR STUDENTS 1 S DISCUSSED WITH THEM 000048 6/03/96 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 000477 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst Supts ANNOUNCEMENT LOG KEPT Principals LR 39 4/29/92 000003 4/23/96 MANN MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET DANCE PERFORMANCE FOR ELEMENTARY STUDENTS 000005 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 5/02/96 5/07/96 PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL PV PARTNER BARNES \u0026amp; NOBLE ONGOING CONTACTS LR ROTARY, STUDENTS ATTEND MEETINGS PV PARENT RECR. QTR. MTG. HONORS NIGHT PROGRAM 000006 5/07/96 5/08/96 5/10/96 BOOKER MAGNET SCHOOL MONTHLY CALENDARS KIWANIS, CHANBER AND REPORT _ COMMUN. AGCY. PRESENT AWARD \"SHOW AND TELL\" RECRUITMENT SHOW AND TELL\" WITH CHAMBER LINKS, INC. POSTER CONTEST RECRUITMENT WITH CHAMBER Report Date\nPage: Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 64 Use Community Agencies to Assist with Recruitment  . 13ID Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Datet Page: Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 65 5/19/96 LINKS, INC. CHANNEL 14 BROADCAST 000007 DUNBAR MAGNET JR. HIGH 4/01/96 4/01/96 SCHL RCRTMENT TM DVLPNG RCRTMENT PLNS PRNTS INVOLVED IN PLNG RCRTMENT 000009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 5/01/96 STATE HEALTH DEPT.-TUTORING SEPT 1995-MAY 1996 000015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4/17/96 4/17/96 SECME TEAM WORKED WITH COMMUNITY AGENCIES TO OFFER SPECIAL INCENTIVES FOR STUDENTS 000016 MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 5/15/96 SOUTHWEST HOSPITAL DISPLAY 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 5/15/96 5/24/96 PARTNERS IN EDUCATION: UALR/SHARE AMERICA, KFC ON ASHER, HAGAN AGENCY AND DHS/MENTOR PROGRAM HEALTHY FAMILY CLINIC BANQUET NUSA BANQUET 000018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 STAFF WORKING WITH JUVENILE DIVISION. 000028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY 4/20/96 5/16/96 5/16/96 5/19/96 HELPING HANDS (BEAUTIFIED SCHOOL GROUNDS FIELD TRIP TO SAFARI PARK KAYS CRITTERS (ETC) SIXTH GRADE GRADUATION 000030 JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/22/96 SIXTH GRADE CHALLENGE. 6.14ID Program Name Primary Leader 000032 DODD ELEMENTARY 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 000033 6/03/96 6/03/96 000037 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date REFERRALS MADE TO: DHS, PRACTITIONERS, SOUTHWEST LR CHARTER HOSPITAL, PRIVATE ark. CHILDREN'S HOSP., HEALTHY FAMILY CENTER BATTERED WOMEN'S SHELTERS, MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ADVERTISING AT PARTNERS BUSINESS COMPLETED FOR SCHOOL YEAR FOR RECRUITING 5/07/96 GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY SHOW AND TELL DAYS 000043 6/04/96 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL QUARTERLY RECRUITMENT PLANNED REVIEWED/COMPLETED 000045 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL WOODRUFF HELD \"OPEN HOUSE\" TION PERIOD IN JANUARY AND PRINCIPAL JOINED AND HET WITH DURING PREREGISTRA-FEBRUARY STIFPT STATION NEIGHBORHOOD CAPITOL VIEW/ PARTICIPANTS TO \"CHECK US OUT\" ASSN.\nINVITED 000048 6/11/96 6/11/96 6/11/96 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REAL ESTATE AGENTS ENCOURAGED 000478 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst RESIDENTS TO THE SCHOOL VISITORS INFORMED AND GIVEN TO BRING PROSPECTIVE Supts PRINTED INFO 000003 4/01/96 000005 Principals LR 39 4/29/92 MANN MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET FOOTLOCKER VIDEO PARTICIPANTS PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 4/01/96 ONGOING EFFORTS BY STAFF REC. STUD. 96-97 PARTIC. 6. IS Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text Staff Recruit Students to 8/20/96 66 Participate ID Program Name Primary Leader 000007 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader DUNBAR MAGNET JR. HIGH 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 000015 Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Date I Paget Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 67 CLB SPNSRS TARGET STDNTS WHO DON'F VOLNTR DUNBAR MENTORS ENCRG INVLVMNT BY STDNTS ANNCHNTS IN DLY BLTN BY SPNSRS CLUB DAYS CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4/08/96 4/08/96 4/08/96 CLUB SPONSORS PLACED ANNOUNCEMENTS IN THE DAILY BULLETIN AND CONFERENCED WITH STUDENTS INDIVIDUALL CONCERNING PARTICIPATION IN EXTRACURRICULAR ACT. 000016 MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4/01/96 SPECIAL TALENT SHOW RECRUITMENT 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 5/10/96 5/10/96 5/20/96 5/30/96 RECRUITMENT AND REGISTRATION OF 4-YEAR OLD STUDENT PARENT LETTER SENT TO 6TH PARENTS FOR PROGRAM FLYER SENT HOME FOR AWARDS ASSEMBLY STUDENTS ENCOURGAED TO PARTICIPATION IN PARK-N-REC 4-YEAR OLD STUDENT/PARENT PICNIC 000018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 SCHOOL TOURS. 5/01/96 SUMMER SCHOOL RECOMMENDATIONS. 5/07/96 5/15/96 SHOW AND TELL. RECRUITMENT UPDATE. 000021 CARVER MAGNET SCHOOL 4/23/96 5/01/96 COE AMBASSADORS MURRAY'S DRUMMETS DRUMMERS 000024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5/24/96 PROGRAM FOR NEIGHBORHOODS MEETING 6.16ID Program Name Primary Leader 000027 GIBBS MAGNET SCHOOL 5/02/96 5/07/96 5/09/96 000030 4/01/96 000033 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date I I Report Datet Page\nAbbreviated Text 8/20/96 68 CINCO DE MAYO SHOW N'TELL RECRUITMENT INTERNATIONAL FESTIVAL JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STAFF ENCOURAGEMENT AND OBSERVATION OF STUDENTS. 6/03/96 6/03/96 000037 MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STAFF COUNSELING OF STUDENTS EXTRA CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES COMPLETED GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY 5/06/96 5/07/96 000038 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 000043 TO PARTICIPATE IN FOR SCH. YEA STUD COUNCIL OFFICERS HAVE CLEAN STUD ASSIST WITH SHOW AND TELL PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY CERTIFIED AND NON-CERTIFIED STUDENTS TO PARTICIPATE IN ALL ACTIVITIES. WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 6/04/96 000045 UP DAY DAYS STAFF WILL RECRUIT EXTRA-CURRICULAR NO NEW STRATEGIES IMPLEMENTED THIS QUARTER WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 IN OCTOBER, THE LIBRARY MEDIA SPECIALIST TALKED WITH FIFTH 6 SIXTH GRADE CHILDREN ABOUT THE LIBRARY SERVICE CLUB\nSHE PUT SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON TRYING TO RECRUIT BOYS ON 10/31/95, COUNSELOR EXPLAINED PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS FOR \"PEER HELPERS\" ON 10/23/95, COUNSELOR EXPLAINED PARTICIPATION t.nID Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Reporl\nDate i Page s B/20/96 69 Abbreviated Text Page Date 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 REQUIREMENTS FOR RED RIBBON PARADE ON 11/9/95, COUNSELOR MET WITH PEER HELPERS TO SELECT FOUR PARTICIPANTS FOR RETREAT 000046 MABELVALE ELEMENTARY 5/23/96 QUIZ BOWL 000048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/03/96 6/03/96 TEACHERS CONTACT AND RECOMMEND STUDENTS FOR ACTIVI TEACHERS COMPLETE RECOMM. FORMS FOR SUMMER PROG. 000050 OTTER CREEK ELEMENTARY 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 000479 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst FLAG MONITORS SAFETY PATROL FIRE MARSHALLS CHOIR MEDIA MONITORS STUDENT COUNCIL Supts Principals LR 39 4/29/92 Staff Contact Students Individually for Involvemen 000003 MANN MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET 4/01/96 FOOTLOCKER VIDEO PARTICIPANTS 000005 PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 4/01/96 COUNS., ADM., TCHRS., CONF. WITH STUDENTS 000007 DUNBAR MAGNET JR. HIGH 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 PUPIL SRVCS TM TRGTNG STDNTS INDVDLY DUNBAR ALUMNI MENTORS ENCRG INVLVMNT OF STDNTS SECME TEAM TRGTD FUTURE BOBCATS 000009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 4/12/96 PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT AGAINST DRUG \u0026amp; ALCOHOL 6.18ID Program Name Primary Leader 4/12/96 5/03/96 5/17/96 5/17/96 USE. 000011 4/24/96 4/25/96 4/28/96 4/28/96 5/14/96 5/14/96 000016 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date QUIZ BOWL APR 25, 1996 3RD QTR NATL FAMILY PARTNERSHIPS(RED RIBBON ASSOC.) BETA CLUB PIZZA PARTY SOUTHWEST JUNIOR HIGH QUIZ BOWL TEAM COMPETES PARTICIPATED IN IN PRELIMINARIES ORIENTATION FOR PARENTS AND TAKE OUR DAUGHTERS TO WORK and DRILL TEAM TRYOUTS SABRINA BONE ACCEPTED IN SCIENCE. DID DAY STUDENTS ON CHEERLEADE AEGIS PROGRAM: MOTIVATION Report Date I Page: Abbreviated Text 4/01/96 5/15/96 MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL FBLA SPONSOR RECRUITED FOR TALENT CLUB DAY SHOW 000017 5/07/96 5/08/96 5/08/96 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SHOW \u0026amp; TELL ACTIVITIES SHOW 6 TELL ACTIVITIES STAFF ENCOURAGES 6TH GRADER TO PARTICIPATION IN PR 000030 4/01/96 JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PARTICIPATION IN ALL ACTIVITIES IS EQUITY ADDRESSE 000038 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY CONTINUE TO CONTACT STUDENTS PARTICIPATION. INDIVIDUALLY FOR 000043 6/04/96 GEOGRAPHY BEE, SPELLING BEE, IE BUS MONITORS, ANTHEM MONITORS, MATH OLYMPIAD, QUIZ bowl, 6th grade challenge, MOTHERS DAY TEA, DAY, ACCELERATED READER, TALENT TUTORS. WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL NO NEW STRATEGIES IMPLEMENTED CAREE SHOW, MENTORS AND THIS QUARTER 6.19 8/20/96 70 ID Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference 000045 Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Page Date WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL Report Dates Page: Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 71 4/01/96 SEE ACHIEVEMENTS UNDER 478 000048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/03/96 SEE OBLIG. 000478 000480 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst Supts Principals LR 39 4/29/92 Staff Should Recruit From Students Who Do Not Norm 000005 PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 4/01/96 PEER HELPER ORG. REC. ACTIV. ALL STUD. 4/01/96 4/01/96 FOR. EXC. STUD. AND INT. CLUB ACTIV. TWICE MONTHLY SAP GROUP MTGS. 000007 DUNBAR MAGNET JR. HIGH 4/01/96 CLUB SPNSRS ACTVLY RECRUIT 4/01/96 STFF MBRS CNTCTR PRNTS TO ASSI 4/01/96 4/01/96 TCHRS ELIMINATE BARRIERS FOR F TRIPS(FIN/TRABS) SECME 000015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4/09/96 ONGOING DAILY ANNOUNCEMENTS/ BULLETINS 000016 MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 5/23/96 5/23/96 5/23/96 READING CLUB SPONSOR RECRUITED WITH READATHON DRILL TEAM/PEP CLUB SPONSOR RECRUITED STUDENTS CHEERLEADER SPONSOR RECRUITED STUDENTS 000018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 EXTENDED DAY PROGRAM. 4/26/96 5/01/96 GOOD TIMES CLUB. SUMMER SCHOOL RECOMMENDATIONS. 000027 GIBBS MAGNET SCHOOL 4/03/96 GENERAL ASSEMBLY 6.20ID Program Name Primary Leader 4/19/96 4/30/96 5/02/96 5/09/96 5/14/96 5/16/96 5/28/96 000030 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader EARTH DAY PARADE QUIZ BOWL PORTFOLIO PARTIES INTERNATIONAL FESTIVAL 5TH/6TH GRADE MUSICAL BASKETBALL TOURNAMENT FOLKDANCE PERFORMANCE JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 000040 Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date ALL STUDENTS PARTICIPATE IN MOST ACTIVITIES ROTATING BASIS. ON A ROMINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5/10/96 5/10/96 5/10/96 5/30/96 5/30/96 5/31/96 STUDENTS SELECTED TO PERFORM AND SERVE VOLUNTEER RECEPTION THAT DO NOT NORMALLY PARTICIPATE. STUDENTS SELECTED FOR PARTICIPATION IN AT THE SIXTH GRADE CELEBRATION THAT DO NOT NORMALLY PARTICIPATE. STUDENTS SELECTED FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE HONORS 000043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL Report Date\nPage: Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 72 6/04/96 RACIAL BALANCE MAINTAINED - NO RECRUITMENT NEEDED 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL I 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 LIBRARY MEDIA SPECIALIST DISCUSSED LIBRARY SERVICE CLUB WITH BOYS\nRECRUITED GROUP WITH EQUITABLE REPRESENTATION BY RACE AND GENDER COUNSELOR APPEALED TO STUDENTS SO THAT PARTICIPATION IN PEER HELPERS AND RED RIBBON PARADE WOULD BE EQUITABLE BY RACE AND GENDER ( 000048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/03/96 SEE OBLIG. 00478 I 6.21ID Program Name Primary Leader 000481 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst Supts 000001 CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL Report. Date: 8/20/96 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Principals Paget 73 Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date LR 39 4/29/92 Abbreviated Text Increase Student Participation, Part. Minority Stu 4/27/96 DECA NATIONAL CAREER CONFERENCE-2 STUDENTS TO FLA 000005 PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 4/01/96 CLUB SPONSORS ENC. OF MINOR STUD. 4/01/96 STUDENTS IN CLUBS REC. OTHERS 000007 DUNBAR MAGNET JR. HIGH 4/01/96 WILL SHOW INCREASE IN ENROLMNT IN ACTS 4/01/96 FUTURE BOBCATS 4/01/96 SECME 000009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 4/01/96 TRACK(GIRLS \u0026amp; BOYS) PRACTICE TENNIS 000010 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 4/01/96 SECME EVENTS 000015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4/08/96 MINORITY STUDENTS ARE ACTIVE PARTICIPANTS IN ALL 4/08/96 CLUBS AND ORGANIZATIONS 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/10/96 FIELD TRIPS 4/19/96 HONOR'S ASSEMBLY 4/24/96 QUIZ BOWL 5/01/96 2ND ROUND QUIZ BOWL 5/16/96 BASKETBALL GAME WITH DODD 5/17/96 KINDERGARTEN STUDENTS SING AT OAK MANOR NURSING HO 5/21/96 BASKETBALL GAME WITH STAFF 5/23/96 6TH GRADE CHALLENGE 6.22ID Program Name Primary Leader 5/30/96 5/30/96 000018 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date ! ( 6TH GRADE MUSICAL 6TH GRADE PROMOTION AND PICNIC BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5/01/96 5/01/96 000030 4/01/96 4/01/96 000033 PEER HELPER TRAINING. SUMMER SCHOOL RECOMMENDATIONS. JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ALL STUDENTS PARTICIPATE IN MOST ACTIVITIES ROTATING BASIS. ON A 5/01/96 000038 MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OPENED SPORTS PROGRAM FOR MORE APPLICANTS PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 4/15/96 4/15/96 000043 Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 74 PRINCIPAL AND STAFF WILL CONTINUE STUDENT PARTICIPATION WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 6/04/96 000045 TO ENCOURAGE NO RACIAL IMBALANCE EXISTS AT PRESENT TIME WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 5/13/96 5/13/96 5/13/96 5/13/96 SEE ACHIEVEMENTS UNDER 478 SEE ACHIEVEMENTS UNDER 480 PRINCIPAL ARRANGED INSERVICE FOR STAFF FROM MABEL DONALDSON RE: NEGATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF SOME POTENTIALLY GIFTED STUDENTS EQUITABLE IDENTIFICATION TO ENCOURAGE 000047 TERRY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5/04/96 5/13/96 5/24/96 SATURDAY CLEAN UP DAY TALENT SHOW RIVERFEST 6.23LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET EXXZUHENT Report Datet Paget 8/20/96 75 ID Program Name Primary Leader Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Abbreviated Text Page Date 5/29/96 5/30/96 5/30/96 FIELD DAY NEWBERRY BASH 6TH GRADE CEREMONY 000048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/03/96 TEACHERS ENCOURAGE/RECOMMEND STUDENTS TO PART. 000482 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst Supts Principals LR 39 4/29/92 Profile Student Involvement in Each Club/Activity 000004 METRO VO-TECH/EDUC. CENTER 5/09/96 AWARDS ASSEMBLY 000005 PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 4/01/96 ONGOING REPORTS ENT TO AAA, MRC, COE, BI-RACIAL 4/01/96 MONITORING TEAM 6/05/96 ADM., DEPT. CHRM. YEAR-END REPORTS TO ASST. SUPT. 6/05/96 AND PRIN. 000006 BOOKER MAGNET SCHOOL 4/05/96 SCHOOL PROFILE UPDATED 6/03/96 SCHOOL PROFILE UPDATED 000007 DUNBAR MAGNET JR. HIGH 4/01/96 SCHL PROFILE INCL RACE GENDER OF PRTCPNTS CLB/ACTV 000009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 4/29/96 TEACHERS READING CONFERENCE 4/29-5/3/96 5/03/96 5/03/96 GOLD/FLYERS HONOR ROLL SPRING CONFERENCE-CONWAY 5/07/96 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE VISIT 5/08/96 CC TEACHER APPREC. 5/08/96 CC TEACHER APPREC. 5/08/96 TENNIS TOURNAMENT 5/8-9 5/19/96 NJHS 6.24 ID Program Name Primary Leader 5/20/96 5/21/96 5/24/96 5/24/96 5/24/96 5/24/96 000015 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader FACULTY BASKETBALL GAME ALL STUDENTS HONOR ROLL RECOGNITION GR.F.=GREEN FLYERS B-D PARTY, WAVES GEMS INC. BOYS/GIRLS ATHLETIC AWARDS TRACK Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4/05/96 SEE STUDENT PROFILE 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5/08/96 5/16/96 5/19/96 5/23/96 5/30/96 SEND ANNOUNCEMENT TO COMMUNICATION ON CLUBS CAREER SHADOWING TRIP TO DHS OLYMPLIC READERS PIZZA PARTY HEALTH FAIR FIELD TRIP AWARDS ASSEMBLY HONORING CLUB PART. 000020 MCDERMOTT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/08/96 PROFILE STUDENT PARTICIPATION 000030 JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5/31/96 5/31/96 QUARTERLY REPORTS MADE ON ACTIVITIES AND AWARDS BY RACE AND GENDER. I 000032 DODD ELEMENTARY 4/01/96 4/01/96 STUDENTS NOT ABLE TO COVER COST OF FIELD TRIPS ARE COVERED THRU ACTIVITY FUNDS 6 FUND FUNDRAISERS FO 000033 MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5/31/96 5/31/96 RECOGNIZED STUDENT PARTICIPATION IN ACTIVITIES DURING AWARDS PROGRAM 000043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 6/04/96 STUDENT INVOLVEMENT INCLUDED IN SCHOOL PROFILE \u0026lt;25 Report Datei Pagel Abbreviated Text 76 8/20/96 ID Program Name Primary Leader 000045 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 000046 Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Datet Paget Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 77 PRINCIPAL UPDATED SCHOOL PROFILE REPORT AT THE END OF NINE-WEEK PERIODS TO ALLOW MONITORING OF RACIAL/GENDER EQUITY IN CLUB/ACT. PARTICIPATION MABELVALE ELEMENTARY 4/09/96 JUST SAY NO CLUB PASSED OUT YELLOW RIBBONS SAFE SC 000048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/11/96 INFORMATION AVAILABLE IN SCHOOL PROFILE 000485 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst Supts Principals LR 39 4/29/92 Provide Dist. Transportation for Extracurricular 000003 MANN MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET 4/01/96 DRAMA-YEARLY 000005 PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/26/96 COACHES, SPONSORS PROVISION OF EQUIP. ONGOING TRANS. FOR \"ANNIE\" PERFORMANCES ONGOING TRANS. FOR ATHLETES BASEBALL, TRACK TRANS. FOR \"ANNIE\" PERFORMANCES 000010 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 TRACK MEETS SOCCER AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM 000015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4/05/96 4/05/96 ONGOING TRANSPORTATION IS PROVIDED FOR STUDENTS WHO PARTICIPATE IN EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/03/96 FIELD TRIP -HALL HIGH LRSD TRANSFORATION 6.26 ID Program Name Primary Leader 5/01/96 5/10/96 5/14/96 5/14/96 5/16/96 5/17/96 5/17/96 5/24/96 000029 5/28/96 000030 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader FIELD TRIP - zoo P4 FIELD TRIP ZOO STH GRADE FIELD TRIP ZOO UTILIZE TRANS. field TRIP FIELD TRIP Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date LRSD TRANSPORTATION LRSD TRANSPORTATION 1ST AND 2ND GRADES FOR FIELD TRIPS ZOO - DHS CAREER SHADOWING LRSD TRANSPORTATION LRSD TRANSPORT - KINDERGARTEN TO RILEY'S LRSD TRANSPORTA OAK MANOR NUR UTILIZE TRANS. WESTERN HILLS ELEM. 4/04/96 5/03/96 FOR FIELD TRIPS RIVERFEST SCHOOL BASKETBALL/CHEERLEADERS TRANSPORTED TO TOURNAMENT JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SECME MULTICULTURAL NIGHT. SPRING CARNIVAL. 000031 CLOVERDALE ELEMENTARY 4/17/96 5/07/96 5/17/96 000033 6/03/96 000043 BUS DRIV APPREC CONCERT AT 3RD GRADE SUNG AT CAPITOL 1 BASKETBALL GAME W/BATES ELEM MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/04/96 000045 : DUNBAR FOR TEACHERS APPRECIATIO PROVIDED FREE TRANSPORTATION WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 FOR ALL FIELD TRIPS NO TRANSPORTATION NEEDED FOURTH WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL BUS TRANSPORTATION WAS PROVIDED WHO NEEDED RIDES FOLLOWING PRIOR TO AVAILABILITY OP PRIN. QUARTER TO ALL STUDENTS EXTENDED DAY LESSONS S COUN. TRANSPORTED CHILDREN NOT MISS ANY LESSONS BY BUSES FOR EXTENDED DAY, SO THEY WOULD STARTING LATE Report DateI Paget Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 78ID Program Name Primary Leader 000048 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5/30/96 Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date TRANSPORTATION PROVIDED FOR ALL SCHOOL ACTIVITIES 000486 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst Supts Principals LR 39 4/29/92 000003 MANN MATH/SCIENCE MAGNET 4/01/96 TENNIS 000005 PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 4/01/96 COACHES, SPONSORS PROVISION OF EQUIP. ONGOING 000007 DUNBAR MAGNET JR. HIGH 4/01/96 ALL STDNTS HAVE ACCESS TO EQUIP, ETC FOR PRTCPTN 000011 SOUTHWEST JUNIOR HIGH 4/24/96 SHIRTS PROVIDED FOR QUIZ BOWL TEAM 000015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 5/31/96 5/31/96 STUDENT UNIFORMS WERE ORDERED COACHES MONITOR EQUIPMENT NEEDS ON AN ONGOING BASI 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 5/16/96 5/21/96 PE AND SPORTS EQUIPMENT PROVIDED FOR ALL CLASSES BASKETBALL GAME WITH DODD BASKETBALL GAME WITH STAFF 000033 MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/03/96 6/03/96 PROVIDED UNIFORMS FOR BASKETBALL TEAM AND CHEERLEADERS DURING SCHOOL YEAR 000043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 6/04/96 PTA PROVIDED ALL UNIFORMS FOR 6TH GR. BASKETBALL 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 WOODRUFF PTA PROVIDED SCHOOL TEE-SHIRTS FREE OF 6.28 Report Datet Page: Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 79 Provide Student Access for Uniforms/Equip. Needed ID Program Name Primary Leader 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 000048 4/30/96 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date I1 COST TO CHILDREN WHOSE THE SHIRTS - ONGOING FAMILIES COULD NOT AFFORD PRINCIPAL PAID ADMISSION activity fund for children NOT AFFORD TO PAY PEES FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY 000487 Ex-Curr Partcipation 000005 SCHOOL Asst 4/01/96 000006 FEES, ETC. OUT OF WHOSE FAMILIES COULD FOR FIELD TRIPS T-SHIRTS PROVIDED FOR QUIZ Supts Principals BOWL TEAM MEMBERS LR 40 PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL USE OF SCH. PROFILE FOR COE, PBD, S FAC. MTG. 4/05/96 6/03/96 000007 BOOKER MAGNET SCHOOL SCHOOL PROFILE UPDATED SCHOOL PROFILE UPDATED Report Datei Page: Abbreviated Text 4/29/92 Develop/Use School 4/01/96 4/01/96 000010 DUNBAR MAGNET JR. HIGH SCHL PRFL DATA UTLZD TO I PROFILE RVWD W/BI RACIAL DTRMN NEC CHANGES . CMTTEE 4/01/96 000015 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR. HIGH review data for SCHOOL PROFILE 4/30/96 4/30/96 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL CLOVERDALE JR. PLACED FIRST IN THE CITY HIGH VARSITY BOYS TRACK TEAM 000017 4/01/96 5/16/96 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SCHOOL PROFILE UP-DATED ON UPDATE/FINALIZW SCHOOL PROFILE REGULAR BASIS for year 000030 5/31/96 JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL QUARTERLY REPORTS REVIEW GRADES S ACTIVITIES OF AL 8/20/96 80 Profiles for Overview of Succes LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Report Datex Pages 8/20/96 81 ID Program Name Primary Leader Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Abbreviated Text Page Date 5/31/96 STUDENTS. 000033 MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/03/96 KEPT SCHOOL PROFILE CURRENT DURING SCHOOL YEAR 000043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 6/04/96 SCHOOL PROFILE UPDATED QUARTERLY 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 PRINCIPAL MONITORED RACIAL/GENDER DISTRIBUTION OF STUDENTS ENROLLED IN OR RECOMMENDED FOR G/T PRINCIPAL MONITORED RACIAL/GENDER DISTRIBUTION OF PARTICIPANTS IN EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES PRINCIPAL MONITORED AND, AS NEW STUDENTS ENROLLED, ADJUSTED DISTRIBUTION OF CHILDREN IN CLASSROOMS AT PRINCIPAL'S DIRECTION, RESOURCE TEACHER KEPT A PROGRAM ROLL TO MONITOR RACIAL/GENDER COMPOSITION OF THE SPECIAL ED. PROGRAM 000048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/11/96 DATA AVAILABLE IN SCHOOL PROFILE 000488 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst Supts Principals LR 40 4/29/92 Profile Sch. By: Grade Diet., Att., Dis-Action, Te 000005 PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 5/01/96 6/05/96 ADM. REVIEW OF 3RD S 4TH 9 WKS. GRADES, SEM. AVER. PREP. BY ADM. OF END OF YR. ANNUAL REPORTS 000006 BOOKER MAGNET SCHOOL 4/05/96 6/03/96 SCHOOL PROFILE UPDATED SCHOOL PROFILE UPDATED 000015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4/15/96 ONGOING UPDATE OF SCHOOL PROFILE INFORMATION WAS 6.30 ID Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Datei Page: Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 82 4/15/96 COMPLETED 000016 MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL I i 5/28/96 AWARDS ASSEMBLY 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/03/96 6/05/96 6/07/96 4 TH QURT. ATTEN. REPORT COMPLETED STATE DISCIPLINE REPORT SUBMITTED 4TH QUARTER MONITORING REPORTS 000020 MCDERMOTT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/08/96 PROFILE: GRADE DISTRIBUTION,ATT.,DISCTEST SCORES 000028 CHICOT ELEMENTARY J 5/29/96 PROVIDE TEST SCORES STUD INVOL 000029 WESTERN HILLS ELEM. SCHOOL 6/07/96 6/07/96 6/07/96 6/07/96 GRADE DISTRIBUTION REPORT EXAMINED YEARLY STATE/DISTRICT DISCIPLINE REPORT TURNED IN STANFORD 8 SPRING SCORES EXAMINED YEARLY ATTENDANCE REPORTS GIVEN TO TEACHERS/PRINCI 000033 MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/03/96 PROFILE CURRENT WITH ALL INFORMATION 000043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 6/04/96 SCHOOL PROVILE UPDATED QUARTERLY 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 PRINCIPAL DISTRIBUTED ALL STUDENTS EQUITABLY BY RACE/GENDER INTO CLASSROOMS APTER REGISTRATION PRINCIPAL MAINTAINED SPREADSHEET SHOWING RACIAL/ GENDER DIST. OP STUDENTS IN CLASSROOMS \u0026amp; CONSUL-  . 31ID Program Name Primary Leader 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 000048 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC ixx: DOC Page Date TED IT PRIOR TO ASSIGN. NEW STUDENTS TO CLASSES PRINCIPAL UPDATED SCHOOL PROFILE AT END OF NINE-WEEK PERIODS TO MONITOR COMPLIANCE WITH EDUCATION EQUITY MONITORING DOCUMENT AT PRINCIPAL'S DIRECTION, RESOURCE TEACHER KEPT A PROGRAM ROLL TO MONITOR RACIAL/GENDER COMPOSITION OF THE SPECIAL ED. PROGRAM BY 9/11/95, PRINCIPAL DESIGNED \u0026amp; PROVIDED DATA-ANALYSIS FORMATS TO TEACHERS FOR USE IN POSTING SAT-8 RESULTS IN ALL SUB-TEST AREAS PRINCIPAL DEVELOPED SYSTEMS FOR MONITORING ACHIEVEMENT OF STUDENTS BY RACE AND GENDER ON A QUARTERLY BASIS: GRADE BOOKS, MONITOR. REPORTS, CLASS PROFILES WERE COMPLETED IN RACE/GENDER CATEG PRINCIPAL MONITORED RACIAL/GENDER DISTRIBUTION OF STUDENTS ENROLLED IN OR RECOMMENDED FOR G/T PRINCIPAL MONITORED RACIAL/GENDER DISTRIBUTION OP PARTICIPANTS IN EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/11/96 DATA AVAILABLE IN SCHOOL PROFILE 000489 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst Supts Principals LR 40 4/29/92 000005 PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 4/01/96 RACIAL BREAKDOWN EXTRA-CURR. PREP. FOR COE, AAA 000006 BOOKER MAGNET SCHOOL 4/05/96 6/03/96 DATA DISAGGREGATED DATA DISAGGREGATED 000010 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 4/01/96 SCHOOL PROFILE 000015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4/15/96 SEE SCHOOL PROFILE 6.32 Report Datei Pagel Abbreviated Text Disaggregate Data by Race 8/20/96 83 ID Program Name Primary Leader 000017 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 6/01/96 6/05/96 SCHOOL PROFILE UPDATED ON A REGULAR DISAGGREGATE SPRING SAT-8 BY RACE SUBMITTED SCHOOL WIDE PLAN WITH BASIS DATA 000018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5/01/96 5/16/96 EPSF TESTING DATA. SAT-8 TEST DATA. 000027 GIBBS MAGNET SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/24/96 CLASSROOM MONITORING FORMS QUARTERLY DISTRIBUTION SHEETS C.O.E. 000029 6/03/96 WESTERN HILLS ELEM. SCHOOL DISTRICT PROVIDES STANFORD 8 SCORES BY RACE/GENDER 000033 I 6/03/96 MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEST DATA EXAMINED BY RACE, SEX, GENDER I I 000043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 6/04/96 DATA ON FILE IN SCHOOL PROFILE - UPDATED QUARTERLY 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 SEE ACHIEVEMENTS UNDER 488 TEACHERS LISTED NAMES OP CHILDREN IN GRADE BOOKS, ON MONITORING REPORTS, AND ON CLASS PROFILES IN RACIAL/GENDER GROUPS TO FACILITATE EQUITY MONITORING OF 000047 5/28/96 TERRY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SAT 8 RESULTS ANALYZED 6.33 Report Datei Page I Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 84ID Program Name Primary Leader 000048 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/11/96 DISAGGREGATED DATA IN SCHOOL PROFILE 000490 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst Supts Principals 000005 PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 4/01/96 ONGOING CLASSES 000006 BOOKER MAGNET SCHOOL 6/03/96 000007 Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC LR Page Date 40 LANG. ARTS PLUS, MATH ASSIST. INTERVENTION STRATEGIES UTILIZED DAILY DUNBAR MAGNET JR. HIGH 4/01/96 4/01/96 PUPIL SERV TM ADRS INTRVNTN STRATEGY BI RACIAL CMTTEE SGSTD STRATEGIES 000015 CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 5/02/96 5/02/96 000016 Report Dates Pagel Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 85 4/29/92 Provide Develop./Implementation of Intervention St ONGOING FACULTY MEETINGS/TEAM MEETINGS/ ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL MEETINGS/ DEPARTMENTAL MEETING MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4/05/96 5/01/96 5/28/96 STAFF DEVELOPMENT/CONFLICT RESOLUTION ROPES COURSE AWARDS ASSEMBLY 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 5/01/96 6/04/96 COE PLAN PURCHASE INTERVENTION PROGRAM WITH TITLE I COMPLETE APPLICATION FOR SUCCESS FOR ALL 000018 BRADY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 BIRTHDAY CLUB. STANFORD 8 TESTING STRATEGIES. STAFF WORKING WITH JUVENILE DIVISION. 6.34 ID Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Datet Page: Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 86 i i 1 I 4/01/96 4/02/96 4/17/96 5/01/96 5/01/96 5/04/96 5/15/96 EXTENDED DAY PROGRAM. EXTENDED DAY PROGRAM. SANFORD TOLLETTE. SUMMER SCHOOL RECOMMENDATION. EPSF TESTING. COE PLAN. SIP UPDATE WITH FACULTY. 000797 000033 6/03/96 6/03/96 000043 MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INTERVENTION ACTIVITIES COMPLETED TEACHERS PROVIDED SUMMER ACTIVITIES WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 6/04/96 000045 FOR SCHOOL YEAR FOR STUDENTS INTERVENTION STRATEGIES IN COE REPORT WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 5/13/96 5/13/96 000048 CONTINUED PRINCIPAL HET WITH PUPIL SERVICES trial OF MODIFICATIONS PRIOR TO REFERRAL TEAM TO ASSURE CONSIDERATION FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION - PRINCIPAL ENCOURAGED SPONSORS TO MAKE TO RECRUIT SUB-GROUPS WHO HAD BEEN SENTED IN ACTIVITIES IN THE PAST - PRINCIPAL ARRANGED INSERVICE BY FOR ONGOING EFFORTS UNDERREPRE- ONGOING MABEL DONALDSON TO ADDRESS DISPARITY IN REFERRALS TO G/T FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/07/96 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst Supts 3 STAFF COMPLETE TRAINING FOR SITE-BASED PLANNING Principals LR 39 4/29/92 Provide and Encourage students to Participate - Ex 000005 PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 5/01/96 5/03/96 INV. TO STUDENTS TO HONORS NIGHT ASSBLY. SOPH. SCI. STUD. VISIT UAMS 000009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 4/26/96 SCHOOL CARNIVALS. 3. ENCOURAGE GOOD BEHAVIOR 6 Cl . 35ID Program Name Primary Leader 4/26/96 4/26/96 000017 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date -IZENSHIP \u0026amp; GOOD GRADES TO PARTICIPATE IN TEAM INC TIVES, PARTICIPATION IN TEAM/SCHOOL SPORTS. BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 MORNING AND AFTERNOON ANNOUNCEMENTS, NEWSLETTERS PARENT BULLETINS PARTNERS IN EDUCATION ACTIVITY FUND 000024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/03/96 4/04/96 4/11/96 4/11/96 4/11/96 4/23/96 4/23/96 4/25/96 5/01/96 5/01/96 5/03/96 5/14/96 5/17/96 5/17/96 5/22/96 5/23/96 5/24/96 5/30/96 EASTER EGG HUNT KINDERGARTEN DECORATIVE ARTS MUSEUM TRIP ETC. FIELD TRIP TO BAPTIST HOSP. FIELD TRIP TO BAPTIST HOSPITAL FOR KIND. HEIFER PROJECT FOR FOURTH GRADE NATURE PROJ. QUIZ BOWL COMPETITION WATER TREATMENT PLANT TRIP GRADE 2 TRIP TO PLAY \"ANNIE\" AT PARKVIEW FIELD TRIP TO ZOO FOR KIND. ARTS CENTER TRIP FOR GRADE 1 GR. 6 PINNACLE MOUNTAIN TRIP FOR GRADE 4 SIXTH GRADE TRIP TO BLANCHARD SPRINGS CHILDREN'S MUSEUM TRIP FOR GRADE 1 PINNACLE MOUNTAIN TRIP GRADE 2 SIXTH GRADE CHALLENGE FOR ETC STUDENTS FIFTH GRADE TRIP ON RIVERBOAT RIVERFEST TRIP FOR KIND. SIXTH GRADE TRIP TO ALLSOPP PARK 000029 WESTERN HILLS ELEM. SCHOOL 5/30/96 EX-CURRICULUM ACT. PROMOTED AT AWARDS ASSEMBLY 000038 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 4/01/96 CONTINUE TO PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR STUDENT 6.36 Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 87 ID Program Name Primary Leader 4/01/96 000043 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date PARTICIPATION. WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 6/04/96 NO NEW STRATEGIES IMPLEMENTED IN FOURTH QUARTER 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 SEE ACHIEVEMENTS UNDER ALL AREAS PERTAINING EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES: TO 000048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/11/96 SEE OBLIGATIONS 473-490 473-490 Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 88 I 6.37 I i iLRSD FY /96 Program Budget Document Program Name: Program Code: Ex-Curriculr:Tri-Dis 07 Primary Leader: Asst Supts Secondary Leader: Principals Report Datet Page: 8/20/96 89 Program Description: THE PURPOSE OF THIS PROGRAM IS TO ENSURE THAT ALL STUDENTS HAVE AN EQUITABLE OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE VARIOUS SCHOOL ACTIVITES. FY Program Budget: $.00 Ist Qtr Expend: $.00 3rd Qtr Expend: $.00 FTE: .00 YTD Expenditures: $.00 2nd Qtr Expend: $.00 4th Qtr Expend: $.00 %Budget Spent: .00 % 7.1ID Program Name Primary Leader 002247 Ex-Curriculr:Tri-Dis Asst Supts 000045 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Principals WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 000048 Legal Reference EXX: DOC DOC Page Date I 30 RESPONSIBILITY OF ASSOC SUPTS, PAGE 30 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/11/96 002248 Ex-Curriculr:Tri-Dis Asst THIS IS A SECONDARY OBLIGATION Supts Principals I 30 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 RESPONSIBILITY OF ASSOC SUPTS, PAGE 30 000048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/11/96 002250 Ex-Curriculr:Tri-Dis Asst THIS IS A SECONDARY OBLIGATION Supts Principals I 30 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 RESPONSIBILITY OF ASSOC SUPTS, PAGE 30 000048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/11/96 002251 Ex-Curriculr:Tri-Dis Asst THIS IS A SECONDARY OBLIGATION Supts Principals I 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 RESPONSIBILITY OF ASSOC SUPTS, PAGE 30 000048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/11/96 002252 Ex-Currioulr:Tri-Dis Asst THIS IS A SECONDARY OBLIGATION Supts Principals I Report Date: Paget Abbreviated Text 4/29/92 Study dist. GPA/Citizenship 4/29/92 4/29/92 8/20/96 90 requiremens Review policies/% student participation Review dist. racial group repres. extracur. activ. 30 4/29/92 Appoint comm, to evaluate results of data review 30 4/29/92 Recruit students participate in cocurricular act. i 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 BEGINNING IN SEPTEMBER, TWO PARENTS SENT INFORMATION HOME WITH ALL GIRLS ABOUT A BROWNIE SCOUT 7.2ID Program Name Primary Leader 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 000048 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC ixx: DOC Page Date Repoxrt Date t Paget Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 91 TROUP\n20 GIRLS MET WEEKLY ALL YEAR IN OCTOBER, THE LIBRARY MEDIA SPECIALIST TALKED WITH FIFTH \u0026amp; SIXTH GRADE CHILDREN ABOUT THE LIBRARY SERVICE CLUB\nSHE PUT SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON TRYING TO RECRUIT BOYS ON 11/9/95, COUNSELOR MET WITH PEER HELPERS TO SELECT FOUR PARTICIPANTS FOR RETREAT LIB. MED. SPEC. TALKED WITH BOYS INDIVIDUALLY ABOUT LIB.SERV.CLUB\nSUCCESSFULLY RECRUITED GROUP WITH EQUITABLE REPRESENTATION BY RACE AND GENDER IN OCTOBER, COUNSELOR APPEALED TO STUDENTS SO THAT PARTICIPATION IN PEER HELPERS AND RED RIBBON PARADE WOULD BE EQUITABLE BY RACE AND GENDER\nCOUN. SPOKE TO CLASSES WITH TEACHERS PRESENT SO THAT TEACHERS COULD HELP WITH RECRUITING FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/11/96 THIS IS A SECONDARY OBLIGATION 002253 Ex-Curriculr:Tri-Dis Asst Supts Principals I 30 4/29/92 Make staff, parents, aware of student opportun. 000004 METRO VO-TECH/EDUC. CENTER 5/07/96 5/08/96 SHOW \u0026amp; TELL SHOW \u0026amp; TELL 000030 JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 5/01/96 5/01/96 PRINCIPALS NEWSLETTER SENT. TEACHERS' NEWSLETTERS SENT. PRINCIPALS NEWSLETTER SENT. TEACHERS NEWSLETTERS SENT. 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 LIBRARY MEDIA SPECIALIST EXPLAINED LIBRARY SERVICE CLUB IN CLASSROOMS WITH TEACHERS PRESENT SO THAT 7.3 ID Program Name Primary Leader 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date TEACHERS COULD HELP WITH RECRUITMENT OP BOYS COUNSELOR EXPLAINED REQUIREMENTS FOR PEER HELPERS AND FOR PARTICIPATION IN RED RIBBON PARADE IN Report Datet Pagel Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 92 CLASSROOMS WITH TEACHERS PRESENT SO THAT COULD HELP RECRUIT STUDENTS FROM GROUPS : BEEN UNDERREPRESENTED IN PAST YEARS TEACHERS THAT HAD 000048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/11/96 002254 Ex-Curriculr:Tri-Dis Asst THIS IS A SECONDARY OBLIGATION Supts Principals 30 4/29/92 Provide special supports of costs, recruitment I 000004 METRO VO-TECH/EDUC. CENTER 4/30/96 TEACHER ADVISORY LUNCHEON 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 4/01/96 PTA SPONSORED GIRLS WHO WANTED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE BROWNIE SCOUT TROOP BUT WHOSE PARENTS COULD NOT AFFORD THE PEES, UNIFORMS, ETC. 000048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/11/96 002255 Ex-Curriculr:Tri-Dis Asst THIS IS A SECONDARY OBLIGATION Supts Principals 30 4/29/92 Reserve slots to ensure proportional participation I 000030 JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5/31/96 QUARTERLY MONITORING BY COUNSELOR AND ADMINISTRATO 000045 WOODRUFF PRIMARY SCHOOL 4/01/96 4/01/96 FINAL ROSTERS FOR LIBRARY SERVICE CLUB WAS POSTED AFTER STAFF HAD SUCCEEDED IN RECRUITING BOYS 000048 FULBRIGHT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6/11/96 THIS IS A SECONDARY OBLIGATIONLRSD FY /96 Program Budget Document Progreun Name: Program Code: Facilites 00 Primary Leader: Mng Sup Serv Secondary Leader: Dir Plant Serv Report Datet Page: 8/20/96 93 Program Description: TO EQUITABLY MAINTAIN AND REPAIR FACILITIES TO SUPPORT ACADEMIC PROGRAMS, STUDENT ENROLLMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT. FY Program Budget: $.00 1st Qtr Expend: $.00 3rd Qtr Expend: $.00 FTE: .00 YTD Expenditures: $.00 2nd Qtr Expend: $.00 4th Qtr Expend: $.00 ^Budget Spent: .00 % 8.1 ID Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Page Date I I 000950 Facilites 000956 Facilites 001323 Facilites 001326 Facilites 001327 Facilites 001328 Facilites 001329 Facilites 001337 Facilites 001354 Facilites 001356 Facilites 003147 Facilites 005127 Facilites 005128 Facilites 005130 Facilites Mng Mng Mng Mng Mng Mng Mng Mng Mng Mng Mng Mng Mng Mng Sup Serv Sup Serv Sup Serv Sup Serv Sup Serv Sup Serv Sup Serv Sup Serv Sup Serv Sup Serv Sup Serv Sup Serv Sup Serv Sup Serv Dir Plant Serv Dir Plant Serv Dir Plant Serv Dir Plant Serv Dir Plant Serv Dir Plant Serv Dir Plant Serv Dir Plant Serv Dir Plant Serv Dir Plant Serv Dir PLANT SERV Dir Plant Serv Dir Plant Serv Dir Plant Serv LR CO LR LR LR LR LR I MR MR I CO CO CO 129 26 129 129 129 129 129 5 43 47 5 5 6 8 4/29/92 5/01/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 6/05/92 6/05/92 4/29/92 2/08/95 2/08/95 2/08/95 Report Datex Page: Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 94 Maintain all school facilities for safe/operable c Revise Jr. High Capacity Study Concrete walks/macadam drives will be in good repa Plan New Jr. High Construction Involve Parties in Planning for Additional Jr. Hig Involve Adm. in Jr. High Planning Establish Construction Timelines Further school const, must have court approval Provide Incentive School Landscaping Make Incentive schools priority in district capita Schs in lower socio-econ. areas shall receive equ Court requires long-range facilities plan Involve the community in plan decision-of budget i Fac. Study to considert Distr. goals \u0026amp; Objectives mLRSD FY /96 Program Budget Document Program Name: Program Code: Federal Programs 00 Primary Leader: Supt Secondary Leader: Dir Fed Progs Report Dates Page: 8/20/96 95 Program Description: FEDERAL PROGRAMS IS DESIGNED TO INCREASE FUNDING AND ENHANCE THE QUALITY OF LRSDS ACADEMIC PROGRAMS. A VARIETY OF FUNDING SOURCES ARE ACTIVE IN THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. FROM THESE SOURCES COMPENSATORY AND SUPPORT SERVICES ARE PROVIDED TO STUDENTS BY FUNDING SECURED THROUGH A COLLABORATIVE EFFORT OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND THE LRSD. COLLABORATION INCLUDES FORMING DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEES AND CONDUCTING GRANT WRITING SESSIONS FOR GRANT DEVELOPERS. FY Program Budget: $.00 1st Qtr Expend: $.00 3rd Qtr Expend: $.00 FTE: .00 YTD Expenditures: $.00 2nd Qtr Expend: $.00 4th Qtr Expend: $.00 %Budget Spent: .00 % 9.1ID Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Secondary Leader ixx: DOC Exx: Page Date 000336 Federal Progreuns 000338 Federal Programs Supt Supt Dir Fed Progs Dir Fed Progs LR LR 97 97 4/29/92 4/29/92 000057 FEDERAL PROGRAMS Report Date I Page: Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 96 Submit Application to USDE for Funding Form Grant Devel. Committee 000339 Federal Programs 000342 Federal Programs 000344 Federal Programs 003199 Federal Programs 5/21/96 5/30/96 Supt Supt Supt Asst PLANNING MTG FOR TITLE I AND TITLE VI 97 APPLICAT PLANNING MTG FOR TITLE VI 97 APPLICATION Supts Dir Fed Progs Dir Fed Progs Dir Fed Progs Principals LR LR LR CO 97 97 96 1 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 3/24/93 Develop Grant Proposal Provide Grant Proposal to Board for Approval Identify Programs/Funding Areas Delete PAL after submission/REPLACE ACL. LEARNINGLRSD FY /96 Program Budget Document Report Date\nPage\n0/20/96 97 Program Name\nProgram Code: Finance 00 Primary Leader\nMng Sup Serv Secondary Leader: Mng Finance Program Description\nTHE FISCAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THOSE ACTIVITIES CONCERNED WITH THE DISTRICTS FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS. FY Program Budget: $.00 1st Qtr Expend\n$.00 3rd Qtr Expend: $.00 FTE: .00 YTD Expenditures: $.00 2nd Qtr Expend: $.00 4th Qtr Expend\n$.00 %Budget Spent: .00 % 10.1 I I ID Program Name 000897 Finance 000901 Finance 003190 Finance 004097 Finance 004114 Finance 000080 Primary Leader Mng Sup Serv Mng Sup Serv SUPPORT SERVICES 6/30/96 000080 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Mng Finance Mng Finance Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date MR MR 2 47 6/05/92 6/05/92 COMPARISON OF ACTUAL AND BUDGETED EXPENDITURES Report Datet Paget Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 98 Demonstrate Invest, pd. for children before settle Dist. is bound to keep pledge to double fund incen Mng Mng Mng Sup Sup Sup Serv Serv Serv Mng Finance Mng Finance Mng Finance CO TR TR 41 115 39 1/04/91 2/25/94 4/22/94 Continue double fund, after six yrs. if inc. schs. Get feedback and pub. input from budg. process Submit to courts business cases for expenditures a SUPPORT SERVICES 5/28/96 SUBMITTED BUSINESS CASES/TENTATIVE BUDGET TO COURT 10.2LRSD FY /96 Program Budget Document Program Name: Program Code: Four-Year-Old Prgm 02 Primary Leader: Dir Staff Dev Secondary Leader: Dir Early Child Report Datet Page: 8/20/96 99 Program Description: THE PURPOSE OF THE THE RACIAL BALANCE PROGRAM IS TO MEET THE GROWING NEEDS OF DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS AND TO IMPROVE AT SCHOOLS THAT ARE DIFFICULT TO DESEGREGATE BY INCORPORATING EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION PROGRAMS INTO THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS. THE PROGRAM PROVIDES EXPERIENCES FOR YOUNG CHILD-REN WHICH MEETS THEIR NEEDS AND STIMULATE LEARNING IN ALL DEVELOPMENTAL AREAS - PHYSICAL, EMOTIONAL, SOCIAL AND INTELLECTUAL. PRIORITY FOR IDENTIFICATION OF PROGRAM SITES WILL BE GIVEN TO AREAS THAT HAVE A HIGH CONCENTRATION OF LOW INCOME STUDENTS AND IN SCHOOLS THAT ARE DIFFICULT TO DESEGREGATE. FY Program Budget: $2,082,112.79 1st Qtr Expend: $204,721.39 3rd Qtr Expend: $570,654.94 FTE: 88.00 YTD Expenditures: $2,174,053.34 2nd Qtr Expend: $562,455.68 4th Qtr Expend: $836,221.33 %Budget Spent: 104.42 % 11.1 ID Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Page Date 1 I I I Report DateI Pagex Abbreviated Text 8/20/96 100 000062 Four-Year-Old Prgm 000063 Four-Year-Old Prgm 000064 Four-Year-Old Prgm 000065 Four-Year-Old Prgm 000066 Four-Year-Old Prgm 000073 Four-Year-Old Prgm Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Early Child Dir Early Child Dir Early Child Dir Early Child Dir Early Child Dir Early Child LR LR LR LR LR LR 17 17 17 11 17 17 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 Provide Elem. Prin. Pre-registration Inservice Conduct Pre-registration Media Publicity Assign Students Tag 4-yr-old Students on AS400 Recruit \u0026amp; interview teachers/aides Familiarize Parents w/4-yr-old Program 000132 EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION 5/19/96 6/10/96 6/10/96 000074 Four-Year-Old Prgro 000132 MET WITH PARENTS AT HIPPY GRADUATION LETTER TO PARENTS ON WAITING LIST SEND OFFERING THEM OTHER CHOICES Dir Staff Dev Dir Early Child EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION 4/19/96 PARENT\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_715","title":"Report: ''Little Rock School District 1995-96 Third Quarter Status Report, Program Planning and Budget Document for Desegregation Programs''","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1996-08-22"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance"],"dcterms_title":["Report: ''Little Rock School District 1995-96 Third Quarter Status Report, Program Planning and Budget Document for Desegregation Programs''"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/715"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["budgets"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 1995-96 THIRD QUARTER STATUS REPORT ADDENDUM PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGET DOCUMENT FOR DESEGREGATION PROGRAMS PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION AUGUST 22,1996 AUG 22 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS Program Program Page Program Program Code Name Numbers Code Name Page Numbers 13 APIG/FOCUS ACTIVITY 001.1-001.2 00 PARKVIEW MAGNET 037.1-037.2 00 COLLABORATE:TRI-DIS 002.1-002.2 00 PLANNING  038.1-038.2 06 DESEGREGATION 003.1-003.2 00 PROCUREMENT 039.1-039.2 22 EQUITY MONITORING 004.1-004.5 00 PUBLIC REL:TRI-DIS 040.1-040.3 07 EX-CURR PARTCIPATION 005.1-005.10 00 ROCK. EARLY CHILD ED 041.1-041.2 07 EX-CURRICULR:TRI-DIS 006.1-006.2 00 SCHOOL CLIMATE 042.1-042.7 00 FEDERAL PROGRAMS 007.1-007.2 00 SITE-BASED MANAGEMNT 043.1-043.2 00 FINANCE 008.1-008.2 00 SPECIAL ED:TRI-DIS 044.1-044.2 02 FOUR-YEAR-OLD PRGM 009.1-009.2 15 SPECIAL EDUCATION 045.1-045.3 00 GIFTED PROGRAM 010.1-010.2 08 STAFF RECUIT:TRI-DIS 046.1-046.2 00 GUID/CNSLING:TRI-DIS 011.1-011.2 00 STUD RECUIT:TRI-DIS 047.1-047.2 00 GUIDANCE/COUNSELING 012.1-012.7 00 STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT 048.1-048.2 01 HIPPY 013.1-013.2 00 STUDENT ASSIGNMENT 049.1-049.2 17 INFORMATION SERVICES 014.1-014.2 05 STUDENT DISC:TR-DIS 050.1-050.2 00 INTERDISTRICT SCHOOL 015.1-015.2 00 STUDENT RECRUITMENT 051.1-051.2 75 IS ACAD. ACTIVITIES 016.1-016.2 00 SUMMER SCH:TRI-DIS 052.1-052.2 00 IS ACADEMIC PROGRAMS 017.1-017.3 29 TESTING 053.1-053.2 57 IS EXTENDED DAY/WEEK 018.1-018.2 00 TESTING: TRI-DIS 054.1-054.2 00 IS PARENT INVOLVEMNT 019.1-019.2 00 VOCATIONAL EDUCATION 055.1-055.2 00 IS PARENT RECRUITMNT 020.1-020.2 00 VOCATIONL ED:TRI-DIS 056.1-056.1 00 IS POLICIES/PROCEDRE 021.1-021.2 33 PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 056.1-056.2 00 IS SOCIAL SKILLS 022.1-022.2 73 IS STAFF DEVELOPMENT 023.1-023.2 72 IS STAFFING 024.1-024.2 00 IS STUDENT ACHIEVMNT 025.1-025.2 00 IS SUPPORT PROGRAMS 026.1-026.3 32 LIBRARY/MEDIA SVS 027.1-027.2 18 M TO M MAGNET PRGRM 028.1-028.2 00 M TO M TRANSFERS 029.1-029.2 26 MCCLELLAN COMM. SCH. 030.1-030.2 00 MCCLELLAN MAGNET 031.1-031.2 12 MULTICULTURAL CURR. 032.1-032.2 00 NEW FUTURES 033.1-033.2 14 ORIGINAL MAGNETS 034.1-034.2 00 PARENT INVL:TRI-DIS 035.1-035.2LITTLE ROCKS SCHOOL DISTRICT PREFACE In the June 15, 1993 Court Order, the Little Rock School District (LRSD) was ordered by the Court to implement a planning and budget document to assist with its planning and budgeting process with the objective of linking programs with expenditures. The first Status Report Program Budget Document (PBD) was published and activitated in the 1993-94 school year. Since the imp1ernentat ion of the PBD it has been used to monitor performance and expenditures quarterly and serve as a guide for interim decision making. The result is quarterly composite report of identified programs within the District supported with expenditure information. Over the past three years, LRSD has reassessed the structure of the PBD to implement concise reporting consistent with the Desegregation Plan with emphasis on the Districts goals and objectives. The 1995-96 AUDIT: The 1995-96 audit, conducted in two phases, was an extensive review of the district's legal obligations and their current status. During the first phase, all legal documents relating directly to the LRSD obligations in the Pulaski County Desegregation Case and the LRSD Progreun Budget Document (PBD) were reviewed to verify the accuracy conducted in 1993. of the LRSD Audit of Obligations During the second phase, conducted in the Spring of 1996, primary and secondary leaders met with interview teams to review obligations for which they were responsible. The status of the various obligations were recorded on scan sheets with supporting documentation required and maintained in cates have been removed from the PBD. the LRSD Office of Desegregation. Obligations identified as complete or dupli- PAGINATION: Pages are sequentially numbered beginning with the \"Preface.\" The \"Table of Contents\" lists programs alpha- betlcally. Pages are numbered by program number followed by page numbers (e.g. 001 refers to the program number\n001.1-001.7 refers to the page numbers for program number 001). This Fourth Quarter Status Report Program Budget Document reports activities beginning April 1, 1996 through June 30, 1996. This report contains the following: (1) The Mission Statement of the LRSD\n(2) The Goals of the LRSD\n(3) LRSD's Quarterly Expense Summary\n(4) Explanation of Codes\nand (5) LRSD's Organizational Chart. Page a 1Little Rock School District MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Little Rock School District is to equip all students with the skills and knowledge to realize their aspirations, think critically and independently, learn continously, and face the future as productive contributing citizens. This is accomplished through open access to diverse, innovative and challenging curriculum in a secure environment with a staff dedicated to excellence and empowered with the trust and support of our community. Page 2Little Rock School District GOALS By the year 2001, average student performance for every identified sub group (race, gender) will be at or above the 75th percentile as measured by standardized tests. No later than the year 2001, no fewer than 9 out of 10 students will meet or exceed LRSD standards of performance identified in the core curriculum. \"Each student will set and achieve challenging educational goals tailored to his or her interests, abilities and aspirations related to meaningful work, higher learning, citizenship or service to others. Page 3Little Rock School District EXPLANATION OF CODES The following are definitions for codes for the list of obligatons: Prog Name: Program Name Pri Ld: Primary Leader is the person primarily reponsible for implementation. Secondary Leader is the is the person who completes the PBD and oversees the implementation. Sec Ld: De: Original legal document from which the item comes\nCodes are as follows: CA - Curriculum audit CO - Court Order EX - Exhibit I Interdistrict Plan LR - LRSD Desegregation Plan MR - Monitoring Report SA - Settlement Agreement ST - Stipulation TR - Transcript DP: Page number from original legal document from which the item comes. Date: Date of the legal document. Abbreviated Text: Abbreviated text of the obligation or recommendation. Refer to legal reference for complete version. Page 4QUARTERLY DESEGREGATION EXPENSES Code Program Name FY Budget FTE\"S YTD Expense Xst Qtr. Exp. 2nd Qtr. Exp. 3rd Qtr. Exp. 4th Qtr. Exp. % Budget Spent 13 APIG/FOCUS ACTIVITY COLLABORATE S TRI-DIS 183,900.00 .00 .00 .00 156,414.41 .00 2,278.62 .00 21,714.13 .00 60,744.00 .00 71,677.66 85.05 .00 .00 24 COMPTRIZD TRANSPORT 6 DESEGREGATION 22 EQUITY MONITORING 7 EX-CURR PARTCIPATION 7 EX-CURRICULRsTRI-DIS 6,800.00 500,451.75 478,054.39 82,400.00 .00 .00 13.00 6.00 .00 .00 3,092.00 493,335.29 345,450.49 74,621.66 .00 .00 .00 .00 FACILITES .00 .00 .00 2 1 51 17 75 57 73 72 32 18 26 FEDERAL PROGRAMS FINANCE FOUR-YEAR-OLD PRGM GIFTED PROGRAM GUID/CNSLING:TRI-DIS GUIDANCE/COUNSELING HENDERSON MAGNET HIPPY INCENTIVE SCHOOLS INFORMATION SERVICES INTERDISTRICT SCHOOL IS ACAD. ACTIVITIES IS ACADEMIC PROGRAMS IS EXTENDED DAY/WEEK IS FOREIGN LANGUAGE IS GUIDANCE/COUNSEL IS LATIN PROGRAM IS PARENT INVOLVEMNT IS PARENT RECRUITMNT IS POLICIES/PROCEDRE IS SOCIAL SKILLS IS STAFF DEVELOPMENT IS STAFFING IS STUDENT ACHIEVMNT IS SUPPORT PROGRAMS LIBRARY/MEDIA SVS M TO M MAGNET PRGRM M TO M TRANSFERS MCCLELLAN COMM. SCH. MCCLELLAN MAGNET .00 .00 2,082,112.79 .00 .00 .00 .00 233,228.63 .00 717,087.08 .00 36,663.00 .00 440,719.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 27,696.00 581,135.13 .00 .00 409,808.64 359,648.82 .00 40,000.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 88.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 20.50 .00 5.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 19.34 .00 .00 16.00 7.40 .00 .00 .00 2,174,053.34 .00 .00 .00 .00 190,759.14 .00 729,677.62 .00 27,994.02 .00 551,783.88 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 574,809.28 .00 .00 379,559.68 374,977.20 .00 .00 .00 117,897.77 161,918.28 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 204,721.39 .00 .00 .00 .00 23,352.90 .00 601,721.26 .00 .00 .00 9,751.30 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 51,226.85 .00 .00 32,881.28 29,464.29 .00 .00 .00 Page 5 122,073.85 152,635.46 63,281.52 .00 119,905.55 8,641.46 9,717.50 .00 3,092.00 133,458.12 22,255.29 1,622.64 .00 45.47 98.58 72.26 90.56 .00 .00 .00 .00 562,455.68 .00 .00 .00 .00 54,946.72 .00 44,010.36 .00 4,308.16 .00 112,740.93 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 353.61 138,877.71 .00 .00 111,904.76 109,025.66 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 570,654.94 .00 .00 .00 .00 52,704.87 .00 42,364.67 .00 7,966.18 .00 144,355.46 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 200.00 142,894.35 .00 .00 103,964.31 77,387.12 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 836,221.33 .00 .00 .00 .00 59,754.65 .00 41,581.33 .00 15,719.68 .00 284,936.19 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 385.46 241,810.37 .00 .00 130,809.33 160,099.73 .00 40,000.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 104.42 .00 .00 .00 .00 81.79 .00 101.76 .00 76.35 .00 125.20 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 3.39 98.91 .00 .00 92.62 104.26 .00 100.00 .00QUARTERLY DESEGREGATION EXPENSES Code Progran Name FY Budget FTE\"S YTD Expense 1st Qtr. Exp. 2nd Qtr. Exp. 3rd Qtr. Exp. 4th Qtr. Exp. % Budget Spent 12 14 33 15 9 8 5 77 29 MEDIA SRVSsTRI-DIS MULTICULTURAL CURR. NEW FUTURES ORIGINAL MAGNETS PARENT INVL!TRI-DIS PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT PARKVIEW MAGNET PLANNING PROCUREMENT PUBLIC REL:TRI-DIS ROCK. EARLY CHILD ED SCHOOL CLIMATE SITE-BASED MANAGEMNT SPECIAL ED:TRI-DIS SPECIAL EDUCATION STAFF DEVELOPMENT STAFF DVLPMNT:TRI-DI STAFF RECUIT:TRI-DIS STUD RECUIT:TRI-DIS STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT STUDENT ASSIGNMENT STUDENT DISC:TR-DIS STUDENT RECRUITMENT SUMMER SCH:TRI-DIS SUMMER SCHOOL: JTPA TESTING TESTINGS TRI-DIS VOCATIONAL EDUCATION VOCATIONL EDS TRI-DIS .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 123,868.60 .00 4,336,650.00 .00 34,000.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 56,846.12 448,983.75 .00 53,469.17 .00 .00 .00 94,826.02 .00 .00 .00 4,307.00 .00 .00 .00 5.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 7.00 .00 1.00 .00 .00 .00 2.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 100,674.68 .00 11,354.76 .00 23,348.05 .00 33,610.84 .00 32,361.03 .00 81.28 .00 4,472,530.11 .00 .00 .00 1,546,290.00 .00 1,503,150.75 .00 1,423,089.36 .00 103.13 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 53,699.13 361,425.28 .00 54,098.42 .00 .00 .00 101,553.02 .00 .00 .00 2,894.81 .00 .00 .00 298.48 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 8,944.07 78,332.41 .00 13,165.13 .00 .00 .00 23,067.57 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Page 6 7,810,92 .00 7,946.02 .00 17,944.58 .00 100.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 13,644.06 89,096.52 .00 12,630.44 .00 .00 .00 23,801.73 .00 .00 .00 325.90 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 12,977.04 90,452.47 .00 12,527.47 .00 .00 .00 25,556.88 .00 .00 .00 1,284.91 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 18,133.96 103,543.88 .00 15,775.38 .00 .00 .00 29,126.81 .00 .00 .00 1,284.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 94.46 80.50 .00 101.18 .00 .00 .00 107.09 .00 .00 .00 67.21 .00 .00 .00ADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Program Name: Program Code: APIG/Focus Activity 13 Primary Leader: Asst Supts Secondary Leader : Principals Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 7 Program Description: AREA SCHOOL STUDENTS WILL PARTICIPATE IN ONGOING AND MEANINGFUL ENRICHMENT ACTIVITIES THAT COMPLIMENT AND EXTEND THE CORE CURRICULUM. THE REGULAR OPERATION BUDGET IN TWENTY THREE AREA ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS WILL BE SUPPLEMENTED WITH AN ALLOCATION OF $20.00 PER STUDENT. FY Program Budget: $183,900.00 1st Qtr Expend: $2,278.62 3rd Qtr Expend: $60,744.00 FTE: .00 YTD Expenditures: $156,414.41 2nd Qtr Expend: $21,714.13 4th Qtr Expend: $71,677.66 %Budget Spent: 85.05 % 1.1ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader 000817 APIG/Focus Activity Asst Supts 000038 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Secondary Leader Principals PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 3/26/96 3/26/96 000818 APIG/Focus Activity 000819 APIG/Focus Activity 000820 APIG/Focus Activity 000821 APIG/Focus Activity 000822 APIG/Focus Activity 000828 APIG/Focus Activity 000829 APIG/Focus Activity 000830 APIG/Focus Activity Asst Asst Asst Asst Asst Asst Asst Asst DOC DOC DOC LR Page Date 81 4/29/92 FOCUSED ACTIVITY FUNDS WILL BE USED TO ENHANCE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Supts Supts Supts Supts Supts Supts Supts Supts Principals Principals Principals Principals Principals Principals Principals Principals LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR 83 83 83 83 85 85 85 85 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 1.2 Report Datex Page x Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 8 Implement Focused Activities in Elementary Area Sc Principal Appoints Activities Coordinator and Stee Develop Activities Action Plan Develop Checklist to Monitor Program Use Checklist to Assist Activities Coordinator Provide Means for Area Schools to Reduce Disparity Make Grant Awards Submit Schools Progress Reports Conduct Program EvaluationADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Program Name: Program Code: Collaborate s Tri-Dis 00 Primary Leader: SUPT Secondary Leader : ASSOC SUPT Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 9 Program Description: COOPERATION AMONG THE THREE PULASKI COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTS IS CRUCIAL TO THE SUCCESS OF THE COUNTYWIDE DESEGREGATION PLAN. THE THREE DISTRICTS WORK COLLABORATIVELY IN THE AREAS OF STUDENT ASSIGNMENT, STAFF AND STUDENT RECRUITMENT TO ENSURE THAT ALL STUDENTS ARE PROVIDED WITH EQUAL OPPORTUNITUES AND AN ORDERLY, SUPPORTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT. FY Program Budget: $.00 1st Qtr Expend: $.00 3rd Qtr Expend: $.00 FTE: .00 YTD Expenditures: $.00 2nd Qtr Expend: $.00 4th Qtr Expend: $.00 %Budget Spent: .00  2.1ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date 000537 Collaborate:Tri-Dis SUPT ASSOC SUPT LR 47 000538 Collaborate:Tri-Dis SUPT ASSOC SUPT LR 47 002205 Collaborate:Tri-Dis SUPT ASSOC SUPT I 24 002206 Collaborate:Tri-Dis SUPT ASSOC SUPT I 24 002207 Collaborate:Tri-Dis SUPT ASSOC SUPT I 24 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 002208 Collaborate:Tri-Dis SUPT ASSOC SUPT 1 24 4/29/92 2.2 Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 10 Collaborate with PCSSD/NLRSD to Facilitate/Enhance Use strategies contained in the \"Inter-Dist. Deseg Appoint tri-dist. improvement council Address ongoing planning for deseg Appoint comm, for specific concerns Meet concerning coordinating areas related to theADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Program Name: Program Code: Desegregation 06 Primary Leaden Assoc Supt Secondary Leader : Asst Supts Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 11 Program Description: THE OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION IS CHARGED WITH MONITORING OF THE DESEGREGATION PLAN WHICH INCLUDES THE APPROPRIATE ASSIGNMENT OF STUDENTS TO SCHOOLS. FY Program Budget: $500,451.75 1st Qtr Expend: $117,897.77 3rd Qtr Expend: $119,905.55 FTE: 13.00 YTD Expenditures: $493,335.29 2nd Qtr Expend: $122,073.85 4th Qtr Expend: $133,458.12 %Budget Spent: 98.58 % 3.1ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 12 000936 Desegregation 000938 Desegregation 000939 Desegregation 000940 Desegregation 000941 Desegregation 000947 Desegregation 001188 Desegregation 001189 Desegregation 001190 Desegregation 001191 Desegregation 001192 Desegregation 001194 Desegregation 001195 Desegregation 001198 Desegregat ion 003221 Desegregation 003222 Desegregation Assoc Assoc Assoc Assoc Assoc Assoc Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Asst Supts Asst Supts Asst Supts Asst Supts Asst Supts Dir PRE LR CO CO co co I 28 4/29/92 2 12/16/94 2 12/16/94 2 12/16/94 2 12/16/94 6 Bd of Directors Bd of Directors Bd of Directors Bd of Directors Bd of Directors Bd of Directors Bd of Directors Bd of Directors Bd of Directors Bd of Directors Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR C8 C8 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 5 11/01/49 5 11/01/49 3.2 Monitor the Desegregation Plan Conduct site visits Develop and implement improvement plans Monitor implementation of improvement plans Identify statutes and regulations that impede dese Make quarterly reports to the Office of Desegregat Create environment encouraging academic and human Keep Citizens/Staff Informed Conduct self evaluations of commitment to deseg. Delineate LRSD Deseg Mission to Staff \u0026amp; Community Use Deseg Mission to Develop Policies Examine Racial Makeup of Staff Develop Budget Consistent w/Policies Improve human relations climate No retreat: Effort to eliminate achievement dispar No retreat: Appropriate involvement of parentsADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Program Name: Program Code: Equity Monitoring 22 Primary Leader: Supt Secondary Leader : Assoc Supt Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 13 Program Description: LRSD WILL USE THE METHOD OF MONITORING TO ASSESS EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS\nMONITORING EDUCATION DESEGREGATION BASED UPON THE EDUCATIONAL EQUITY CONCEPT WILL BE USED IN THE SCHOOLS. A SECOND MONITORING AND EVALUATION INSTRUMENT WILL BE GEARED TOWARD THE PROGRAM IN THE INCENTIVE SCHOOLS. THE DISTRICTWIDE BI-RACIAL COMMITTEE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANNUAL MONITORING OF DESEGREGATION IMPLEMENTATION. LRSD WILL MONITOR EDUCATIONAL EQUITY IN ALL SCHOOLS IN THE DISTRICT. THE MONITORING WILL BE CONDUCTED BY THE PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION (PRE)STAFF WITH ASSISTANCE FROM LOCAL BI-RACIAL COMMITTEES CONSISTING OF PARENTS. EACH COMMITTEE WILL CONDUCT AT LEAST ONE SCHOOL VISIT EACH SEMESTER, USING A MONITORING INSTRUMENT DEVELOPED BY THE THREE DISTRICTS. THE INCENTIVE SCHOOLS WILL BE MONITORED AT LEAST ONCE EACH QUARTER BY THE DISTRICT-WIDE BI-RACIAL COMMITTEE. THE COMMITTEE WILL REPORT SEMIANNUALLY TO THE SUPERINTENDENT THE PROGRESS OR LACK OF PROGRESS IN THE SCHOOLS. FY Program Budget: $478,054.39 1st Qtr Expend: $161,918.28 3rd Qtr Expend: $8,641.46 FTE: 6.00 YTD Expenditures: $345,450.49 2nd Qtr Expend: $152,635.46 4th Qtr Expend: $22,255.29 %6udget Spent: 72.26 % 4.1ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Datet Page: Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 14 000396 Equity Monitoring 000398 Equity Monitoring 000399 Equity Monitoring Supt Asst Supts Asst Supts Assoc Supt Principals Principals LR LR LR 30 30 30 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 Ensure Organizational Structure providing equal op Appoint School Based Bi-racial Comm, to monitor Dist. Bi-racial Will Monitor Deseg. Efforts 000016 MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 MONITORING CONDUCTED THIRD QUARTER 000051 WAKEFIELD ELEMENTARY 2/27/96 2/27/96 PRE TEAM CONDUCTED EDUCATIONAL EQUITY MONITORING TEAM. 000116 THE ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 3/25/96 BIRACIAL VISIT REPORT REVIEWED. 000400 Equity Monitoring 000401 Equity Monitoring 000403 Equity Monitoring 000405 Equity Monitoring Asst Asst Asst Asst Supts Supts Supts Supts Principals Principals Principals Principals LR LR LR LR 30 30 30 30 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 Establish Reporting System Provide Staff Inservice on Equity Concerns Provide Prog, to Raise Parental Awareness as miniMonitor School Standards for high quality ed. w/ s 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 ADMIN. MTG. RE:DISCIPLINE/SCHOOL CLIMATE EVERY FRI C.O.E. COMMITTEE MEETINGS ON CONTINUING BASIS RECRUITMENT COMMITTEE MEETINGS 000013 HENDERSON JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 CLASSROOM OBSERVATIONS ONGOING 000016 MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 ADMINISTRATIVE CLASSROOM VISITS, ONGOING 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3/28/96 UALR HOMEWORK CENTER MEETING 000463 Equity Monitoring Asst Supts Principals LR 38 4/29/92 Achieve Equity in Class Structure by Grade/Subject 000007 DUNBAR MAGNET JR. HIGH 1/04/96 PRIN MNTRS CLASS INSTRCTR AND INSTR PRCTCS 4.2ADDENDUM LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference ID Program Name Prinary Leader Secondary Leader DOC DOC EXX: Page Date Report Date: Paget Abbreviated Text 000463 Equity Monitoring Asst Supts Principals LR 38 4/29/92 000007 DUNBAR MAGNET JR. HIGH 8/22/96 15 Achieve Equity in Class Structure by Grade/Subject 1/04/96 MNTRING GT COORDN, DIST GT COORDN, AND PRIN 000009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 1/26/96 PRE-REGISTERED STUDENTS 3/26/96 PRE-REGISTERED STUDENTS 000037 GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY 3/04/96 STUD ARE ASSIGN EQUIT TO CLASS BY RACE/GENDER 000042 WASHINGTON BASIC SKILLS 3/25/96 NEW STUDENTS ASSIGNED ACCORDING TO LRSD POLICY 000116 THE ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 3/25/96 ASSIST AND CONFER WITH PRINCIPAL IN SCHEDULING 3/25/96 STUDENTS INTO CLASSES AS ENTERING CLASSROOM FROM 3/25/96 STUDENT ORIENTATION. 000464 Equity Monitoring Asst Supts Principals LR 38 4/29/92 Review Class Ratios by Subject/Class/Teacher on Se 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 MONITORING MASTER SCHEDULE THROUGH SCHOOL PROFILE 000016 MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 CLASS VISITATION BY ADMINISTRATION AND COUNSELORS 000037 GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY 3/04/96 CLASS RATIO AT EA GR LEV ARE MONITORED AS STUD ARE 3/04/96 ADDED/DROPPED 000038 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 3/25/96 CONTINUE TO REVIEW CLASS RATIOS WHEN ASSIGNING 3/25/96 NEW STUDENTS 000042 WASHINGTON BASIC SKILLS 3/25/96 CLASS ROSTERS MAINTAINED DAILY 4.3ADDENDUM LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Report Date: Pages 8/22/96 16 ID Program Name Primary Leader Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Abbreviated Text Page Date 000464 Equity Monitoring Asst Supts Principals LR 38 4/29/92 Review Class Ratios by Subject/Class/Teacher on Se 000042 WASHINGTON BASIC SKILLS 3/25/96 DAILY ATTENDANCE MAINTAINED DAILY 000116 THE ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 3/25/96 REVIEW STUDENT ROLL BIWEEKLY 000465 Equity Monitoring Asst Supts Principals LR 38 4/29/92 Address Disparities with Intervention Activities 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 IN-SCHOOL SUSPENSION PROGRAM CONTINUING LAP/MATH PLUS PROGRAM CONTINUING LEP (NEWCOMERS PROGRAM) CONTINUING RECRUITMENT FOR CLUBS (ONGOING) COE COMM. DEVELOPMENT OF INTERVENTION STRATEGIES FOR S.I.P. (SCHOOL I 000466 Equity Monitoring Asst Supts Principals LR 38 4/29/92 Remove Address Barriers To Equitable Participation 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 ATHLETIC BUSES PROVIDED FIELD TRIP EXPENSES PROVIDED RECRUITMENT BY CLUB SPONSORS (ONGOING) ORAL EXAMS, MODIFIED GRADING SCALES FOR SPECIAL ED AND INDIRECT SERVICES STUDENTS 000467 Equity Monitoring Asst Supts Principals LR 38 4/29/92 Achieve Equity in Teaching Methods 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 3/25/96 DISTRICT LEVEL CURRICULUM MEETINGS MONTHLY COE COMM. DEV. STRATEGIES FOR SCHOOL IMPROV. PLAN 000468 Equity Monitoring Asst Supts Principals LR 38 4/29/92 Achieve Equity in Student Instructional Practices 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 3/25/96 DISTRICT LEVEL CURRICULUM MEETINGS (MONTHLY) COE COMM. DEVELOPING STRATEGIES FOR SIP 000469 Equity Monitoring Asst Supts Principals LR 38 4/29/92 Review Grade Distribution on Semester Basis 4.4ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Page Date 000469 Equity Monitoring Asst Supts Principals LR 38 4/29/92 Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 17 Review Grade Distribution on Semester Basis 000009 000952 Equity Monitoring 001074 Equity Monitoring 001146 Equity Monitoring 001151 Equity Monitoring 001152 Equity Monitoring 001153 Equity Monitoring 001154 Equity Monitoring 001159 Equity Monitoring 001160 Equity Monitoring 003148 Equity Monitoring 003201 Equity Monitoring HALL HIGH SCHOOL Assoc Assoc Assoc Assoc Assoc Assoc Assoc Assoc Assoc Asst Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supts Dir PRE Dir PRE Dir PRE Dir PRE Dir PRE Dir PRE CO LR LR LR LR LR 1 129 224 224 224 224 Bd of Directors Dir PRE Dir PRE Dir PRE Principals Supt LR LR LR I CO 225 224 225 6 1 8/26/93 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 6/17/93 Submit project management tool to the court each Score, Collect, Store, and Report Test Scores Conduct monitoring w/Local Biracial Committees Establish Monitoring Schedule Conduct Site Visits m Prepare/Distribute Semi-Annual Monitoring Reports Conduct qtr. monitoring visit by District-wide Bir Prepare Semester Reports for Superintendent Distribute Copies of Reports Eval, effectiveness of all personnel and programs Court requires each member of Bd. of Dir. to atten 4.5ADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Program Name: Program Code: Ex-Curr Partcipation 07 Primary Leaden Asst Supts Secondary Leader : Principals Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 18 Program Description: THE PURPOSE OF THIS PROGRAM IS TO ENSURE THAT ALL STUDENTS HAVE AN EQUITABLE OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE VARIOUS SCHOOL ACTIVITES. FY Program Budget: $82,400.00 1st Qtr Expend: $.00 3rd Qtr Expend: $9,717.50 FTEs .00 YTD Expenditures: $74,621.66 2nd Qtr Expend: $63,281.52 4th Qtr Expend: $1,622.64 %Budget Spent: 90.56 % 5.1ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader 000473 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst Supts 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 000474 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst 000002 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Principals Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date LR 39 4/29/92 TEACHER LETTERS TO STUDENTS/PARENTS ACCOMPANIED BY COURSE SYLLABI PHONE MASTER SYSTEM USED TO COMMUNICATE ACTIVITIES TO PARENTS/STUDENTS Supts Principals LR 39 4/29/92 HALL HIGH SCHOOL Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 19 Inform All Students/Patrons of Co-Curricular/Extra Use Media /Press to Inform 3/25/96 3/25/96 ARTICLES IN WAR WHOOP (STUDENT NEWSPAPER) ONGOING ADS PLACED IN ARK. DEMOCRAT/GAZETTE 000009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 2/28/96 2/29/96 3/07/96 BLACK HISTORY DAY CULTURAL FAIR 2/29 - 3/1/96 DRESS CODE(UNIFORMS) 000010 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 1/03/96 3/29/96 USE OF CHANNEL ONE ARKANSAS TIMES 000011 SOUTHWEST JUNIOR HIGH 3/01/96 3/01/96 STAY IN SCHOOL RALLY SPONSORED BY FOOTLOCKER WITH KEITH JACKSON. 000012 MCCLELLAN COMMUNITY HIGH 1/03/96 1/03/96 3/11/96 3/13/96 TWENTY-TWO PRESS RELEASES WENT OUT THIS QUARTER NATIONS NO.l BUSINESS EDUCATION PROGRAM IN THE USA COUNSELOR/SCHOOL ANNOUNCEMENTS CRIMSON PRESS PUBLISHED 000016 MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 1/29/96 3/14/96 ADVERTISEMENT IN AR DEMOCRAT SENT GLOBE INFORMATION TO PRESS RECRUITMENT 5.2ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader 000474 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst Supts 000016 000017 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Principals MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 1/03/96 1/03/96 1/25/96 2/08/96 2/15/96 2/20/96 2/22/96 2/27/96 COMMUNICATIONS 000021 Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date LR 39 4/29/92 NOTIFICATION FORMS SENT TO THE COMMUNICATIONS DEPT. ON GOING SEND SCHOOL ACTIVITIES TO LRSD COMMUNICATION SEND SCHOOL ACTIVITIES TO LRSD COMMUNICATION SEND SCHOOL ACTIVITIES TO LRSD COMMUNICATION SEND SCHOOL ACTIVITIES TO LRSD COMMUNICATION SEND SCHOOL ACTIVITIES TO LRSD COMMUNICATION SEND SCHOOL ACTIVITIES TO LRSD COMMUNICATION CARVER MAGNET SCHOOL 2/22/96 3/11/96 6TH GRADE \"RAINFOREST\" ROOM P.E CLASS PERFORMANCE AT ROMINE ELEM. 000024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 1/06/96 KEY COMMUNICATOR PROVIDES NEWS RELEASES 000025 FRANKLIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3/28/96 3/28/96 LRSD COMMUNICATIONS DEPT. PROCESSES NEWS TO ADVISE THE MEDIA/PRESS OF FRANKLINS ACTIVITIES. 000027 GIBBS MAGNET SCHOOL 1/11/96 1/12/96 1/20/96 2/01/96 2/11/96 2/16/96 2/23/96 2/28/96 3/01/96 ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT GAZETTE GIBBS GEOGRAPHY BEE PICTURE 1ST ANNUAL MAGNET FAIR PRESS RELEASE TEDDY FLEMING 3-PEAT GEO. BEE WINN NEWS AND VIEWS-DIST. NEWSLETTER-FOLK DANCE CLUB FE GIBBS GARDEN PROJECT FEATURED CHANNEL 11 ARK. DEMO/GAZ GIBBS GARDEN PROJECT BLACK HISTORY PROGRAM-CHANNEL 11 CHANNEL 7 HUBERT GUINN EDUCATOR OF THE YEAR JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT - FEATURE GIBBS 5.3 Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text Use Media /Press to Inform 8/22/96 20ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader 000474 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst Supts 000027 GIBBS MAGNET SCHOOL 3/03/96 3/08/96 3/10/96 3/11/96 3/15/96 000030 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Principals SUPERINTENDENT RECEPTION Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date LR 39 Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 4/29/92 Use Media /Press to Inform DUNBER RECREATION CENTE IM BIG ON LITTLE ROCK VIDEO ARK. DEMO/GAZ - KATE HAMILTON GIBBS STUDENTS B. HAMILTON FEATUR BARRETT HAMILTON ARTIST COMPETITION BARRETT HAMILTON YOLONDA WHEELER JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 1/03/96 1/03/96 000032 ARK. DEMO/GA COMMUNICATIONS DEPT. IS NOTIFIED OF APPROPRIATE EVENTS ON A WEEKLY BASIS. DODD ELEMENTARY 1/05/96 1/05/96 ACTIVITIES ARE SENT TO COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY. 8/22/96 21 1/10/96 2/14/96 2/14/96 2/19/96 3/26/96 RECRUITMENT PLAN, INCREASE THE PEACE DAY. BIPPO THE HIPPO, RIF-GRADE 4. ELECTRONIC FIELD TRIP \"DONT WANNA SLAVE NO MORE\"- AFRICAN AM. CHOICES IN AM. REVOL. AFRICAN TALES TELL-A-TALE TROUPE BALE ELEM. 4TH GRADE PRESENTING SHURLEY GR. 3-5 000037 GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY 1/04/96 3/04/96 INFOR ON ALL EVENTS/ACTIVITIES TO COMM DEPT. INFOR ON ALL EVENTS/ACTIVITIES TO COMM DEPT. 000040 ROMINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2/12/96 2/12/96 2/20/96 ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE FEATURED 4 STUDENTS FROM MRS. RAINWATER'S CLASS (SNAKE) PRESENTATION ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE FEATURED THE ASSISTANT 2/20/96 2/25/96 2/25/96 PRINCIPAL AS THE BUMBLEBEE FOR READING ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE FEATURED DANA DUNCAN LRSD TEACHER OF THE YEAR 000042 WASHINGTON BASIC SKILLS 1/03/96 REGULAR SUBMISSIONS TO LRSD COMMUNICATIONS DEPT. 5.4ID ADDENDUM ProgreuQ Name Primary Leader 000474 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst Supts 000042 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Principals WASHINGTON BASIC SKILLS 3/25/96 000043 Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date LR 39 4/29/92 REGULAR SUBMISSIONS TO LRSD COMMUNICATIONS DEPT WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 1/31/96 2/29/96 3/29/96 3/29/96 000475 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst COMMUNICATIONS SENT TO LRSD COMM.DEPT W/ACTIVITIES COMMUNICATIONS SENT TO LRSD COMM.DEPT W/ACTIVITIES COMMUNICATIONS SENT TO LRSD COMM.DEPT W/ACTIVITIES WALL OF FAME* FEAT. NEWSPAPER COVERAGE UPDATED Supts Principals LR 39 4/29/92 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 000476 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst P.T.A. MEETING FLIERS AS NEEDED PARENT LETTERS FROM TEACHERS RE:EXPECTATIONS WITH COURSE SYLLABI WEEKLY CALENDARS FROM ENG. TCHR. W/DAILY ASSIGNMEN P.T.A. NEWSLETTERS QUARTERLY ARTICLES IN WAR SHOOP (ONGOING) ARTICLES IN \"GOOD NEWS\" (LRSD G/T DEPT.) Supts Principals LR 39 4/29/92 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 3/25/96 000477 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst DAILY INTERCOM ANNOUNCEMENTS PUBLIC ADDRESS ANNOUNCEMENTS AT ATHLETIC EVENTS Supts Principals LR 39 4/29/92 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 3/25/96 ACTIVE FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ACTIVE YOUNG LIFE LEADERS VISIT SHCOOL WEEKLY 000009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 1/09/96 3/12/96 TERRY ELEMENTARY NATIONAL FAMILY PARTNERSHIP *S(RED RIBBON ASSOC.) 000010 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 1/03/96 YOUNG LIFE MEETINGS 5.5 Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text Use Media /Press to Inform Send Printed Info to Parents 8/22/96 22 Make Clear Public Address System Announcements to Use Community Agencies to Assist with RecruitmentADDENDUM ID Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Page Date 000477 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst Supts Principals LR 39 4/29/92 000010 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR. HIGH Report Datet Page: Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 23 Use Coimunity Agencies to Assist with Recruitment 1/03/96 REGULAR RECRUITMENT MEETINGS 000012 MCCLELLAN COMMUNITY HIGH 1/03/96 1/03/96 1/03/96 3/18/96 3/28/96 3/29/96 LEWIS ST.CHURCH OF CHRIST -CARTER LONGLEY BAPTIST-MOORE PARKVIEW CHRISTIAN CHURCH LR HOUSING AUTHORITY-P.ASHLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE HENDERSON STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD OP TRUSTEES 000016 MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 2/05/96 NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN. MEETING 000017 BALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 1/03/96 1/03/96 PRINCIPAL CALLS AND VISITS WITH POTENTIAL SCHOOL TOURS RECRUITS ON GOING 000020 MCDERMOTT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 1/04/96 IMPLEMENT RECRUITMENT PLAN 000021 CARVER MAGNET SCHOOL 1/12/96 1/13/96 MAGNET FAIR MAGNET FAIR 000027 GIBBS MAGNET SCHOOL 3/15/96 3/15/96 RECRUITMENT PLAN RECRUITMENT PLAN 000030 JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 1/23/96 ARK. SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA PRESENTATION. 000032 DODD ELEMENTARY 1/05/96 RECRUITMENT PLAN INITIATED. 5.6ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader 000477 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst Supts 000032 DODD ELEMENTARY 1/29/96 OPEN HOUSE. LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Principals 000033 MEADOWCLIFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3/15/96 3/15/96 3/15/96 000037 Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date LR 39 4/29/92 THE SCHOOL RECRUITMENT PLAN HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SCHOOL RECRUITMENT TEAM IS OPERATIONAL, 75% COMPLETED. GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY 1/04/96 RECRUITEMENT TM UPDATES PLAN QUARTERLY 1/04/96 1/04/96 REQUITMENT REPORT SENT TO STUDENT ASSIGN QUARTERLY NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOC ADDED INFO ON CHECK US OUT WK 1/04/96 AND PK-K ROUND UP IN THEIR JAN NEWSLTR Report Date: Paget Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 24 Use Community Agencies to Assist with Recruitment 1/29/96 1/29/96 1/31/96 FLYERS SENT TO CHURCHES/DAY CARES FOR \"CHECK US OU WEEK\" AND OPEN HOUSE FLYERS/POSTERS TAKEN TO CHURCH/DAY CARE FOR PK/K 1/31/96 3/04/96 3/04/96 ROUND-UP RECRUIT TEAM UPDATES PLAN QUARTERLY RECURIT REPORT SENT TO STUDENT ASSIGN QUARTERLY 000038 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 3/27/96 3/27/96 INVOLVE PARENTS TO ASSIT WITH RECRUITMENT. DISPLAY SCHOOL BROCHURES AT LOCAL BUSINESSES. 000042 WASHINGTON BASIC SKILLS 1/03/96 1/03/96 1/03/96 BOY SCOUTS BROCHURES PLACED AT DAY CARE CENTERS HONOR ROLL LISTS PUBLISHED IN CHURCH BULLETINS 3/25/96 3/25/96 BOY SCOUTS BROCHURES PLACED AT DAY CARE CENTERS 3/25/96 HONOR ROLL LISTS PUBLISHED IN CHURCH BULLETINS 000043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 1/12/96 COOPER. WITH MAGNET REVIEW COMM. ON MAGNET FAIR 5.7ID ADDENDUM Prograjn Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Page Date 000477 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst Supts Principals LR 39 4/29/92 000043 WILLIAMS MAGNET SCHOOL 3/15/96 000478 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst RECRUITMENT PLAN UPDATED AND MONITORED FOR 3RD QRT Supts Principals LR 39 4/29/92 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 000479 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst 000480 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst SCIENCE TEACHER TUTORING JR./SR. HIGH STUDENTS APTER SCHOOL MATH TEACHER TUTORING AFTER SHCOOL BAND TCHR TUTORING JR. HIGH STUDENTS AFTER SCHOOL HALL HARLEQUINS DRAMA CLUB RECRUITS STUDENT Supts Supts Principals Principals LR LR 39 39 4/29/92 4/29/92 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 000481 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst SPEC. RECRUITMENT BY HARLEQUIN DRAMA CLUB MATH TEACHER TUTORING AFTER SCHOOL SCIENCE TEACHER TUTORING JR/SR HIGH STUDENTS AFTER SCHOOL BAND TCHR. TUTORING JR. HIGH STUDENTS APTER SCHOOL Supts Principals LR 39 4/29/92 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 000482 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst SPEC. RECRUITMENT BY HARLEQUIN DRAMA CLUB SCIENCE TEACHER TUTORING JR/SR HIGH STUDENTS AFTER SCHOOL MATH TEACHER TUTORING AFTER SHCOOL BAND TCHR TUTORING JR. HIGH STUDENTS AFTER SCHOOL SPEC. RECRUITMENT BY HARLEQUINS DRAMA CLUB Supts Principals LR 39 4/29/92 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 000485 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst Supts SCHOOL PROFILE UPDATED QUARTERLY Principals LR 39 4/29/92 5.8 Report Datei Pagel Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 25 Use Community Agencies to Assist with Recruitment Staff Recruit Students to Participate Staff Contact Students Individually for Involvemen Staff Should Recruit From Students Who Do Not Norm Increase Student Participation, Part. Minority Stu Profile Student Involvement in Each Club/Activity Provide Dist. Transportation for ExtracurricularID ADDENDUM Program Name Prinary Leader 000485 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst Supts 000009 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 000016 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Principals MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 TRANSPORTATION PROVIDED,ONGOING 000024 FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3/25/96 AFTER SCHOOL TUTORING 000037 GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY 3/04/96 000038 Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC LR Page Date 39 4/29/92 TRANS FOR FIELD TRIPS PROVIDED FOR ALL STUDENTS PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 3/26/96 3/26/96 3/26/96 3/26/96 000486 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst CONTINUE TO PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION FOR ALL FIELD TRIPS I.E. FREEDOM TRAIN, MID AMERICA MUSEUM, MUSEUM OF SCIENCE \u0026amp; HISTORY, ARK TERRITORIAL RESTORATION, LR ZOO AND CIVIL RIGHTS MUSEUM. Supts Principals LR 39 4/29/92 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 000487 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst 000488 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst CONTINUAL MONITORING OF PROGRAMS WHICH REQUIRE UNIPORM/EQUIPMENT TO ENSURE ALL STUDENTS HAVE ACCESS IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE Supts Supts Principals Principals LR LR 40 40 4/29/92 4/29/92 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 000489 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst USE \u0026amp; UPDATE, QUARTERLY, SCHOOL PROFILE AS DOCUMENTATION OF SCHOOL PROGS. \u0026amp; ACTIVITIES TO SCHOOL PROFILE USED BY BI-RACIAL MONITORING COMM. Supts Principals LR 40 4/29/92 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 ONGOING BY COE COMM. IN DEVELOPMENT OF SIP 5.9 Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 26 Provide Dist. Transportation for Extracurricular Provide Student Access for Unifoms/Equip. Needed Develop/Use School Profiles for Overview of Succes Profile Sch. By: Grade Dist., Att., Dis.Action, Te Disaggregate Data by RaceID ADDENDUM Progran Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUEXSET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Secondairy Leader DOC DOC DOC Page Date 000489 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst Supts Principals LR 40 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 UPDATING OF SCHOOL PROFILE AS NEEDED 000016 MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 REVIEWED SCHOOL PROFILE, ONGOING 000037 GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY 3/04/96 3/04/96 DISAGGREATE ABOVE DATA BY RACE INCLUD DATA ON COE PLANS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 000042 WASHINGTON BASIC SKILLS 3/25/96 000490 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst MAINTAIN DISAGGREGATED DATA FOR SCHOOL PROGRAMS Supts Principals LR 40 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 SP. ED. 000016 Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 4/29/92 Disaggregate Data by Race 4/29/92 EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT TEAM MTGS.AS NEEDED MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 LIZ LUCKER/PARENTING FIELD TRIP 8/22/96 27 Provide Develop./Implementation of Intervention St 000037 GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY 3/04/96 3/04/96 GRADE LEV CHAIRMAN REV DATA QUARTERLY/DEVELOP STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVEMENT AS NEEDED 000042 WASHINGTON BASIC SKILLS 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 000797 Ex-Curr Partcipation Asst PUPIL SERVICE TEAM REFERRALS SPECIALISTS AND SUPPORT STAFF TUTOR STUDENTS NOONTIME TUTORING FOR SIXTH GRADE Supts Principals LR 39 4/29/92 Provide and Encourage Students to Participate - Ex 5.10ADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Program Name: Program Code: Ex-Curriculr:Tri-Dis 07 Primary Leader: Asst Supts Secondary Leader ! Principals Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 28 Program Description: THE PURPOSE OF THIS PROGRAM IS TO ENSURE THAT ALL STUDENTS HAVE AN EQUITABLE OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE VARIOUS SCHOOL ACTIVITES. FY Program Budget: $.00 1st Qtr Expend: $.00 3rd Qtr Expend: $.00 FTE: .00 YTD Expenditures: $.00 2nd Qtr Expend: $.00 4th Qtr Expend: $.00 %Budget Spent: .00 % 6.1ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 29 002247 Ex-Curriculr:Tri-Dis Asst 002248 Ex-Curriculr:Tri-Dis Asst 002250 Ex-Curriculr:Tri-Dis Asst 002251 Ex-Currlculr:Tri-Dis Asst 002252 Ex-Curriculr:Tri-Dis Asst 002253 Ex-Curriculr\nTri-Dis Asst 002254 Ex-Curriculr:Tri-Dis Asst 002255 Ex-CurriculrsTri-Dis Asst Supts Supts Supts Supts Supts Supts Supts Supts Principals Principals Principals Principals Principals Principals Principals Principals I I I I I I I I 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 Study dist. GPA/Citizenship requiremens Review policies/% student participation Review dist. racial group repres. extracur. activ. Appoint comm, to evaluate results of data review Recruit students participate in cocurricular act. Hake staffs parentsaware of student opportun. Provide special supports of costs, recruitment Reserve slots to ensure proportional participation 6.2ADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Program Name: Program Code: Federal Programs 00 Primary Leader: Supt Secondary Leader : Dir Ped Progs Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 30 Program Description: FEDERAL PROGRAMS IS DESIGNED TO INCREASE FUNDING AND ENHANCE THE QUALITY OF LRSDS ACADEMIC PROGRAMS. A VARIETY OF FUNDING SOURCES ARE ACTIVE IN THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. FROM THESE SOURCES COMPENSATORY AND SUPPORT SERVICES ARE PROVIDED TO STUDENTS BY FUNDING SECURED THROUGH A - COLLABORATIVE EFFORT OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND THE LRSD. COLLABORATION INCLUDES FORMING DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEES AND CONDUCTING GRANT WRITING SESSIONS FOR GRANT DEVELOPERS. FY Program Budget: $.00 1st Qtr Expend: $.00 3rd Qtr Expend: $.00 FTE: .00 YTD Expenditures: $.00 2nd Qtr Expend: $.00 4th Qtr Expend: $.00 %Budget Spent: .00 % 7.1ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader Secondary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 31 DOC DOC DOC Page Date Abbreviated Text 000338 Federal Programs 003199 Federal Programs Supt Asst Supts Dir Fed Progs Principals LR CO 97 4/29/92 Form Grant Devel. Committee 1 3/24/93 Delete PAL after submission/REPLACE ACL. LEARNING 7.2ADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Program Name: Program Code: Finance 00 Primary Leader: Mng Sup Serv Secondary Leader : Mng Finance Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 32 Program Description: THE FISCAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THOSE ACTIVITIES CONCERNED WITH THE DISTRICTS FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS. FY Program Budget: $.00 1st Qtr Expend: $.00 3rd Qtr Expend: $.00 FTE: .00 YTD Expenditures: $.00 2nd Qtr Expend: $.00 4th Qtr Expend: $.00 %Budget Spent: .00  8.1ADDENDUM ID Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Page Date 000901 Finance 004114 Finance Mng Sup Serv Mng Sup Serv Mng Finance Mng Finance MR TR 47 39 6/05/92 4/22/94 8.2 Report Datex Page: Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 33 Dist. is bound to keep pledge to double fund incen Submit to courts business cases for expenditures aADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Program Name: Program Code: Four-Year-Old Prgm 02 Primary Leader: Dir Staff Dev Secondary Leader J Dir Early Child Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 34 Program Description: THE PURPOSE OF THE PROGRAM IS TO MEET THE GROWING NEEDS OF DISADVANTAGED STUDENTS AND TO IMPROVE THE RACIAL BALANCE AT SCHOOLS THAT ARE DIFFICULT TO DESEGREGATE BY INCORPORATING EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION PROGRAMS INTO THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS. THE PROGRAM PROVIDES EXPERIENCES FOR YOUNG CHILDREN WHICH MEETS THEIR NEEDS AND STIMULATE LEARNING IN ALL DEVELOPMENTAL AREAS - PHYSICAL, EMOTIONAL, SOCIAL AND INTELLECTUAL. PRIORITY FOR IDENTIFICATION OF PROGRAM SITES WILL BE GIVEN TO AREAS THAT HAVE A HIGH CONCENTRATION OF LOW INCOME STUDENTS AND IN SCHOOLS THAT ARE DIFFICULT TO DESEGREGATE. FY Program Budget: $2,082,112.79 1st Qtr Expend: $204,721.39 3rd Qtr Expend: $570,654.94 FTE: 88.00 YTD Expenditures: $2,174,053.34 2nd Qtr Expend: $562,455.68 4th Qtr Expend: $836,221.33 %Budget Spent: 104.42  9.1ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAN BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 35 000062 Four-Year-Old Prgm 000063 Four-Year-Old Prgm 000073 Four-Year-Old Prgm 000074 Four-Year-Old Prgm 000076 Four-Year-Old Prgm 000077 Four-Year-Old Prgm 000079 Four-Year-Old Prgm 000080 Four-Year-Old Prgm 000081 Four-Year-Old Prgm 000082 Four-Year-Old Prgm 000087 Four-Year-Old Prgm 000090 Four-Year-Old Prgm 000092 Four-Year-Old Prgm 000093 Four-Year-Old Prgm 000099 Four-Year-Old Prgm 000101 Four-Year-Old Prgm Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Early Child Dir Early child Dir Early Child Dir Early child Dir Early Child Dir Early Child Dir Early Child Dir Early Child Dir Early Child Dir Early Child Dir Early Child Dir Early Child Dir Early Child Dir Early Child Dir Early Child Dir Early Child LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR MR LR LR LR LR LR LR 17 17 17 17 18 18 18 18 18 17 19 19 7 10 10 11 4/29/92 Provide Elem. Prin. Pre-registration Inservice 4/29/92 Conduct Pre-registration Media Publicity 4/29/92 Familiarize Parents w/4-yr-old Program 4/29/92 Conduct Parent Orientation Mtg. \u0026amp; Conference 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 Ensure Key Experiences Occurring in Classroom Evaluate 4-yr-old Program Effectiveness Maintain 4-yr-old Portfolio Assessments 4/29/92 Analyze Test Data for Board Report 4/29/92 Utilize Results for Program Improvement 6/05/92 Support Task Force As Avenue for 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 Input Identify Reps from Agency for Committees Conduct Mtgs to Review Progress of Committees Collaborate w/HIPPY, PCSSD, NLRSD, Head Start Schedule Mtgs. of Reps of Various Entities Inform Waiting List Parents About Vacancies 4/29/92 Compile List of Graduates 9.2ADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Program Name: Program Code: Gifted Program 00 Primary Leader: Dir Except Chil Secondary Leader : Dir Gifted Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 36 Program Description: THE LRSDS GIFTED PROGRAM OFFERS SERVICES TO ITS STUDENTS THROUGH A DESIGN THAT CONSISTS OF OBSERVATION AND ENRICHMENT FOR ALL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-2. RESOURCE ROOMS AND INDIRECT SERVICES ARE PROVIDED FOR GRADES 3-6 AND SPECIAL CLASSES FOR STUDENTS IN GRADES 7-12 ARE OFFERED. THE PROGRAM OPERATES IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE AR DEPT OF EDS GIFTED AND TALENTED APPROVAL STANDARDS. THE STANDARDS PROVIDE THE FRAMEWORK FOR ESTABLISHING EQUITABLE CRITERIA FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF GIFTED AND TALENTED STUDENTS, SERVICES ARE PROVIDED TO THESE STUDENTS BY TEACHERS (SPECIALIST AND FACILITATORS) WHO HAVE COMPLETED OR WHO ARE PURSUING GRADUATE CREDITS IN GIFTED EDUCATION. FY Program Budget: $.00 1st Qtr Expend: $.00 3rd Qtr Expend: $.00 FTE: .00 YTD Expenditures: $.00 2nd Qtr Expend: $.00 4th Qtr Expend: $.00 %Budget Spent: .00 10.1ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 37 000321 Gifted Program 000322 Gifted Program 000323 Gifted Program 000325 Gifted Program 000326 Gifted Program 000327 Gifted Program 000329 Gifted Program 000331 Gifted Program 000333 Gifted Program 000335 Gifted Program Dir Except Chil Dir Except Chil Dir Except Chil Dir Except Chil Dir Except Chil Dir Except Chil Dir Except Chil Dir Except Chil Dir Except Chil Dir Except Chil Dir Gifted Dir Gifted Dir Gifted Dir Gifted Dir Gifted Dir Gifted Dir Gifted Dir Gifted Dir Gifted Dir Gifted LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR 59 59 59 59 60 60 60 61 62 62 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 Share Research/Findings for Program Operation Establish Reg, Mtg. Sched. Tri-District Gifted Sup Inform/Involve Other Adm. Staff of Procedures Participate in UALR Project Promise Share Cost of Outside Consultants Meet to Discuss Individual Program Needs Hold Tri-District Inservices Conduct Staff Meetings for New Teachers Implement Objectives Relating to Plan Implement Strategies/Activities to Refine Plan 10.2ADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 38 Program Name: Program Code: Guid/Cnsling:Tri-Dis 00 Primary Leader: Supt Secondary Leader : Dir Pup Serv Program Description: THE GUIDANCE AND COUNSELING PROGRAM PROVIDES SERVICES TO SUPPPORT ACADEMIC, SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL SUCCESS FOR STUDENTS IN THE THREE PULAKSI COUNTY DISTRICTS. THE DISTRICT'S DIRECTORS OR COORDINATORS MEET MONTHLY TO SHARE CONCERNS AND PLAN FOR JOINT ACTIVITES. FY Program Budget: $.00 1st Qtr Expend: $.00 3rd Qtr Expend: $.00 FTE: .00 YTD Expenditures: $.00 2nd Qtr Expend: $.00 4th Qtr Expend: $.00 %Budget Spent: .00 % 11.1ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Date: Pagex Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 39 000874 Guid/Cnsling:TriDis Supt 000875 Guid/Cnsling:Tri-Dis Supt 000876 Guid/Cnsling:Tri-Dis Supt 001367 Guid/Cnsling:Tri-Dis Supt Dir Pup Dir Pup Dir Pup Dir Pup Serv Serv Serv Serv I I I I 54 54 54 54 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 Increase Employment for Post High School Minority Develop Job Fair Implementation Timelines/Responsi Hold Monthly Tri-Dist. Guid. Dir. Planning Mtgs. Conduct Job Fair for Target Students 000069 DRUG ABUSE EDUCATION 2/26/96 2/26/96 3/26/96 3/26/96 100% COMPLETED - JOB FAIR HELD FOR IITH GRADE 001371 Guid/Cnsling:Tri-Dis Supt 001378 Guid/Cnsling:Tri-Dis Supt 001382 Guid/Cnsling:Tri-Dis Supt 001383 Guid/CnslingtTri-Dis Supt 001385 Guid/CnslingsTri-Dis Supt 001386 Guid/Cnsling:Tri-Dis Supt 001388 Guid/Cnsling:Tri-Dis Supt 001389 Guid/Cnsling:Tri-Dis ASSOC SUPT 001396 Guid/CnslingxTri-Dis Supt 002226 Guid/CnslingxTri-Dis Supt 002228 Guid/CnslingxTri-Dis Supt 002231 Guid/Cnsling:Tri-Dls Supt 002233 Guid/CnslingzTri-Dis Supt 002234 Guid/CnslingxTri-Dis Supt 002237 Guid/CnslingxTri-Dis Supt 002238 Guid/CnslingxTri-Dis Supt 002239 Guid/CnslingxTri-Dis Supt 002302 Guid/CnslingxTri-Dis Supt STUDENTS AT METROPOLITAN VO-TECH JOB FAIR HELD FOR 12TH GRADE NON-COLLEGE BOUND STUDENTS AT FISHER ARMORY, NLR. Dir Pup Serv Dir Pup Dir Pup Dir Pup Dir Pup Dir Pup Dir Pup Dir PRE Dir Pup Dir Pup Serv Serv Serv Serv Serv Serv Serv Serv Dir Pup Serv Dir Pup Dir Pup Dir Pup Dir Pup Dir Pup Dir Pup Serv Serv Serv Serv Serv Serv Dir PUP SERV I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 54 54 54 54 54 54 55 55 54 28 28 28 28 28 29 29 29 54 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 Provide Minority Student Info re Colleges, Contact Colleges Re Minority School/Fin. Aid Increase  Minority Stud, in Advanced Classes Voc.Sch 4/29/92 Notify Students, Parents, Staff re Opportunities 4/29/92 Identify, Encourage Minority Students in AP class 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 Target At-Risk Students Early to Decrease Dropouts Teachers Identify At-Risk and GT Students Inservice Teachers on Pinpointing Student Weakness Implement Intervention Strategies for At-Risk 4/29/92 Target skills needed for 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 employment Hold joint counseling info sessions for counselors Provide target counseling for minority students Enhance minority recruitment Conduct student conferences Districts share inservice to benefit students 4/29/92 Develop student career guidance plan 4/29/92 4/29/92 Review of plan by students, parents, counselors Form biracial, multdist team to monitor test prep 11.2ADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Progran Budget Docunent Program Name: Program Code: Guidance/Counseling 00 Primary Leader: Asst Supts Secondary Leader : Principals Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 40 Program Description: THE GUIDANCE AND COUNSELING PROGRAM PROVIDES SERVICES TO SUPPORT ACADEMIC, SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL SUC- CESS FOR STUDENTS IN THE THREE PULASKI COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTS. LRSD DIRECTORS OR COORDINATORS OF COUNSELING SERVICES WILL MEET WITH THEIR PEERS FROM THE OTHER DISTRICTS ON A MONTHLY BASIS TO SHARE CONCERNS AND PLAN FOR JOINT ACTIVITIES. FY Progran Budget: $.00 1st Qtr Expend: $.00 3rd Qtr Expend: $.00 FTE: .00 YTD Expenditures: $.00 2nd Qtr Expend: $.00 4th Qtr Expend: $.00 %Budget Spent: .00 % 12.1ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader 000443 Guidance/Counseling Asst Supts 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 000444 Guidance/Counseling Asst 000445 Guidance/Counseling Asst 000002 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Secondary Leader Principals DOC DOC DOC LR Page Date 35 4/29/92 Report Date t Page: Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 Inform Students of All Opportunities 41 PHONE MASTER SYSTEM UTILIZED TO DELIVER MSGS. TO STUDENTS/PARENTS (ONGOING) ROTARY SHADOWING EXPERIENCES (ONGOING) WAR WHOOP, STUDENT NEWSPAPER (ONGOING_ DAILY BULLETIN DAILY INTERCOM ANNOUNCEMENTS COUNSELORS SPEAKING IN CLASSROOMS (ONGOING) INDIV. COUNSELOR/STUDENT CONFERENCES (ONGOING) EX. CURRIC. ACTIVITIES RECRUITMENT RESOURCE SPEAKERS/ASSEMBLIES (ONGOING) SCHOLARS WEDNESDAYS (AFTER SCHOOL) AS NEEDED FOR STUDENTS TO RECEIVE ASSISTANCE WITH SCHOLARSHIP APPLICATIONS Supts Supts Principals Principals LR LR HALL HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 35 35 4/29/92 4/29/92 Publish Annual Document of Financial Aid, Higher E Encourage Students to Take Advantage of Opportunit CHAN. 1 SPEC. PROGRAMS SHOWN W RESOURCE SPEAKERS/ASSEMBLIES (ONGOING) EX. CURRIC. ACTIVITIES RECRUITMENT (ONGOING) SCHOLARSHIP BULLETINS DISTRIBUTED PHONE MASTER SYSTEM UTILIZED TO DELIVER MSGS. TO STUDENTS/PARENTS ROTARY SHADOWING EXPERIENCES (ONGOING) WAR WHOOP, STUDENT NEWSPAPER (ONGOING) SCHOLARS WEDNESDAYS (AFTER SCHOOL) AS NEEDED FOR STUDENTS TO RECEIVE ASSISTANCE WITH SCHOLARSHIP APPLICATIONS DAILY BULLETIN DAILY INTERCOM ANNOUNCEMENTS COUNSELORS SPEAKING IN CLASSROOMS (ONGOING) INDIV. COUNSELOR/STUDENT CONFERENCE (ONGOING) 12.2ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date 000445 Guidance/Counseling Asst Supts Principals LR 35 4/29/92 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 000005 PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 3/26/96 3/27/96 3/29/96 STUD. CNCL. TAPING ELECT. SPEECHES STUD. CNCL. TAPING ELECT. SPEECHES STUD. BODY ELECTIONS BROADCAST CHI BROADCAST CHI 000446 Guidance/Counseling Asst 000447 Guidance/Counseling Asst Supts Supts Principals Principals LR LR 35 35 4/29/92 4/29/92 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 000448 Guidance/Counseling Asst PARENT LETTERS (ONGOING) P.T.A. NEWSLETTER QUARTERLY PHONE MASTER FOR DELIVERING INFORMATION (ONGOING) PARENT CONFERENCES (ONGOING) QUARTERLY INTERIM REPORTS QUARTERLY SYLLABI COMMUNICATION FROM COE/RECRUITMENT COMM. (ONGOING) Supts Principals LR 35 4/29/92 000005 PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 3/26/96 LR CITY STEER. COMM. MTG. AT PARKVIEW 000449 Guidance/Counseling Asst Supts Principals LR 35 4/29/92 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 QUARTERLY INTERIM REPORTS QUARTERLY SYLLABI/LETTERS TO PARENTS WAR WHOOP (STUDENT NEWSPAPER) QUARTERLY SYLLABI/LETTERS TO PARENTS 000016 MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 INTERIM REPORTS, ONGOING 000037 GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY 3/04/96 PARENT HANDBOOK/OFENING BULLETIN 12.3 Report Date I Paget Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 42 Encourage Students to Take Advantage of Opportunit Follow-up on Referral Make Parents Part. In Ed. by Keeping Them Informed Hold Community Ed. Mtg. Each Year During Spring Provide Written Info to Parents on CurriculumID ADDENDUM LRSD PRCX3RAM BUDGET EXXZUMENT Legal Reference Program Name Primary Leader Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Page Date 000449 Guidance/Counseling Asst Supts Principals LR 35 4/29/92 000037 GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY 000042 WASHINGTON BASIC SKILLS 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 000450 Guidance/Counseling Asst QUARTERLY INTERIM REPORTS WRITTEN PARENT CONFERENCE FORMS lEP AND REFERRAL CONFERENCES QUARTERLY REPORT CARDS Supts Principals LR 35 4/29/92 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 SCHOLARSHIP BULLETINS FROM COUNSELORS WEEKLY COUNSELORS SPEAKING IN CLASSROOMS (ONGOING) COUNSELORS BULLETIN BOARD W/POSTED OPPORTUNITIES WAR WHOOP (STUDENT NEWSPAPER) BI-MONTHLY ARTICLES ROTARY SHADOWING (ONGOING) COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS (NON-PARENTS PROVIDE WEEKLY EVENING SESSIONS ON ELECTRONICS/TECHNOLOGY 000005 PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 3/27/96 3/28/96 3/29/96 3/29/96 000451 Guidance/Counseling Asst NJROTC ANNUAL INSPECTION ENG. 12 AND ACTING STUD. TO UCA 4TH QTR. STUD. AT JOB FAIR, FBLA AT UALR TEACHERS OF TOM. VISIT UCA Supts Principals LR 35 4/29/92 000005 PARKVIEW HIGH SCHOOL 3/26/96 SR. JOB FAIR LRSD 000116 THE ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 3/25/96 NOT AS OF THIS DATE 000452 Guidance/Counseling Asst Supts Principals LR 35 4/29/92 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 SCHOOL NURSE PROVIDES MEDICAL COUNSELING (ONGOING) 12.4 Report Datet Paget Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 43 Provide Written Info to Parents on Curriculum Make Students Aware of Ed./Post Ed. Opportunities Hold Annual Skills/Employment Fair with Business C Provide Guidance/Counseling to Address Student NeeID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader 000452 Guidance/Counseling Asst Supts 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 000453 Guidande/Counseling Asst Supts 000011 SOUTHWEST JUNIOR HIGH 3/28/96 3/28/96 000016 fa LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Page Date Principals Principals LR LR 35 4/29/92 35 4/29/92 OUR CLUB (W/JUVENILE SERVICES) ! PRE-CHARGING DIVERSION COURT PROGRAM INITIATED AT SWJHS MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 3/25/96 000037 HOME VISTS BY ADMINISTRATORS \u0026amp; COUNSELORS, ONGOING PARTNER IN EDUCATION, ONGOING GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY 3/04/96 3/04/96 000040 COUNS HELFS STAFF FIND COMM SERV FOR STUD IN NEED ELICIT SUPP OF PARTNERS IN ED/PTA TO ASSIS FAM NEE ROMINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3/28/96 3/28/96 3/28/96 000042 \"HEART AND HEALTH\" ASSEMBLY FOR FIFTH AND SIXTH GRADERS SPONSORED DY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER ON DETECTING HEART ATTACKS. WASHINGTON BASIC SKILLS 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 000457 Guidance/Counseling Asst UAMS STUDENT MENTORS LR WASTEWATER UTILITY PARTNER IN EDUCATION CENTRAL RECORDS SERVICES PARTNER IN EDUCATION MEADOWBROOK COMMUNITY CLUB PARTNER IN EDUCATION UALR ASTRONOMY DEPARTMENT PARTNER IN EDUCATION UALR CHEMISTRY DEPARTMENT PARTNER IN EDUCATION STUDENTS REFERRED TO CAMP PFEIFFER SOUTH LITTLE ROCK COMMUNITY CENTER USED FOR P.E. PRE-K REFERRALS TO PUL. CTY. EARLY CHILDHOOD SPEEC PARENT MEMO INCLUDES EX. CURR. ACTIVITIES INFO. Supts Principals LR 37 4/29/92 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL  3/25/96 MONTHLY MEETINGS OF CAREER EXPLORER POST 12.5 Report Date x Page: Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 44 Provide Guidance/Counseling to Address Student Nee Create Community Linkage to Assist Students Provide Minicourses in Sequenced Program Gr 4-12ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Page Date 000457 Guidance/Counseling Asst Supts Principals LR 37 4/29/92 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 000459 Guidance/Counseling Asst MORNING, LUNCH, AFTER-SCHOOL TUTORING BY INDIVIDUA TEACHERS (ONGOING) MATH TEACHER HOLDS HORNING ACT SESSIONS (ONGOING) COMM. CLASSES TEACH NOTE-TAKING SPEAKING AND LISTENING SKILLS (ONGOING) Supts Principals LR 37 4/29/92 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 45 Provide Minicourses in Sequenced Program Gr 4-12 Provide Teacher Staff Development in Use of Curr. 3/25/96 3/25/96 LRSD DISTRICT-WIDE INSERVICES IN MOST AREAS CURRICULAR 000006 BOOKER MAGNET SCHOOL 3/09/96 000460 Guidance/Counseling Asst COUNSELORS INSERVICE Supts Principals LR 37 4/29/92 Raise Awareness of Student Career Options 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 CAREERS IN PUBLIC SPEAKING THROUGH COMMUNICATIONS COURSES (ONGOING) CAREER EXPLORER POST MONTLY MEETINGS (ONGOING) ROTARY SHADOWING OPPORTUNITIES (ONGOING) VOLUNTEERS PROVIDE WEEKLY EVENING SESSION ELECTRONICS/TECHNOLOGY RESOURCE SPEAKERS (ONGOING) ON 000016 MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 CAREER ORIENTATION CLASSES, ONGOING 000037 GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY 3/04/96 3/04/96 GUEST SPEAKER PROV TO TALK TO STUD THROU PARTNERS IN EDUCATION VIPS AND 000116 THE ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 3/25/96 INSERVICE.FOR TEACHERS/ELIMINATING STRESS 12.6ADDENDUM LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference ID Program Name Primary Leader Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Page Date 000460 Guidance/Counseling Asst Supts Principals LR 37 4/29/92 000116 THE ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 000461 Guidance/Counseling Asst Supts Principals LR 37 4/29/92 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 RESOURCE SPEAKERS (ONGOING) 000016 MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 3/27/96 KATHYRN DORN SCIENCES CLASSES 000019 BADGETT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3/26/96 LAW ED. DWAYNE YARBROUGH, OFF. OF ATTN GEN, GR 4-6 000037 GEYER SPRINGS ELEMENTARY 3/04/96 MAINT LIST OF RESOURCE VOLUN THROUGHOUT SCH YEAR 000042 WASHINGTON BASIC SKILLS 3/25/96 VARIOUS GUEST SPEAKERS ABOUT CAREERS 000462 Guidance/Counseling Asst Supts Principals LR 37 4/29/92 000016 MABELVALE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 CLASSROOM VISITATION BY COUNSELORS, ONGOING 000116 THE ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 3/25/96 LEVEL 0 COUNSELING 12.7 Report Date t Page: Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 46 Raise Awareness of Student Career Options Use Resourse Volunteers in Classes/Assem. Career Provide Guidance/Counseling making Students AwareADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 47 Program Name: Program Code: HIPPY 01 Primary Leader: Dir Staff Dev Program Description: HIPPY IS A HOME BASED DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRAM WHICH Secondary Leader : Dir HIPPY TEACHER OF THE CHILD. RECOGNIZES THE MOTHER AS THE FIRST SIGNIFICANT HIPPY ASSISTS THE MOTHER IN PREPARING THE CHILD TO BE SUCCESSFUL IN KINDERGARTEN. THEREFORE ASSISTING IN THE REDUCTION OF THE DISPARITY GAP BETWEEN BLACK HIPPY'S MAJOR FOCUS IS IN THE SHADOW AREAS OF MAJOR INCENTIVE SCHOOLS AND AND WHITE STUDENTS. IN THE SOUTHWEST LITTLE ROCK AREA. HIPPY SERVES PRIMARILY ECONOMICALLY AND EDUCATIONAL DISADVANTAGED FAMILIES. FY Program Budget: $233,228.63 1st Qtr Expend: $23,352.90 3rd Qtr Expend: $52,704.87 FTE: 20.50 YTD Expenditures: $190,759.14 2nd Qtr Expend: $54,946.72 4th Qtr Expend: $59,754.65 %Budget Spent: 81.79  13.1ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader 000030 HIPPY Dir Staff Dev Dir HIPPY 000033 HIPPY Dir Staff Dev Dir HIPPY 000035 HIPPY Dir Staff Dev Dir HIPPY 000041 HIPPY Dir Staff Dev Dir HIPPY 000046 HIPPY Dir Staff Dev Dir HIPPY 000048 HIPPY Dir Staff Dev Dir HIPPY 13.2 Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date LR LR LR LR LR LR 15 15 15 16 16 16 Report Date: Paget Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 48 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 Provide Parents w/Info to Assist w/Their Children Evaluate Aide Trainees Mid-Point Deter. Prog. Success by conducting survey of paren Obtain speakers \u0026amp; sched lectures to provide parent Oranize graduation reception Schedule Final Evaluation of TraineesADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 49 Program Name: Program Code: Information Services 17 Program Description: TO PROVIDE THE Primary Leader\nSupt RESOURCES NECESSARY TO COLLECT, Secondary Leader : Dir Info Serv FY Program Budget: YTD Expenditures: MATION SERVICES WILL PROVIDE THE INFORMATION IN A TIMELY MANNER. 1 BENEFIT FROM ACCURATE UP-TO-DATE STORE AND REPORT INFORMATION ON LRSD\nCOMPUTER RESOURCES NECESSARY TO SCHOOL AND CENTRAL OFFICE BASED ! i INFORMATION ON STUDENTS. STUDENTS. INFOR- I COLLECT, STORE AND REPORT STUDENT STAFF, PARENTS, AND STUDENTS WILL $717,087.08 1st Qtr Expend: $601,721.26 3rd Qtr Expend\n$42,364.67 FTE: 5.00 $729,677.62 2nd Qtr Expend: $44,010.36 4th Qtr Expend: $41,581.33 %Budget Spent: 101.76 % 14.1ID ADDENDUM Progr^un Name Primary Leader 000949 Information Services Supt 001073 Information Services Supt 001075 Information Services Supt 001076 Information Services Supt 001077 Information Services Supt 001078 Information Services Supt LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Dir Info Serv Dir Info Serv Dir Info Serv Dir Info Serv Dir Info Serv Dir Info Serv 14.2 Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date LR LR LR LR LR LR 129 129 130 130 130 130 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 50 Provide support for all school and central office- Collect r Store, and Report Dropout Statistics Collect, Store, and Report Student Achievement Dat Collect, Store, and Report Attendance Collect, Store, and Report Disciplinary Data Collect, Store, and Report Student Assignment DataADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 51 Program Name: Program Code: Interdistrict School 00 Primary Leader: DIR SAO Program Description: THE PURPOSE OF THE INTERDISTRICT Secondary Leader : COORD RECRUIT FY Program Budget: YTD Expenditures: ATTRACT STUDENTS FROM NEIGHBORING DISTRICTS. SCHOOLS IS TO OFFER AN ATTRACTIVE THEMATIC BALANCE OF THE SENDING AND RECEIVING DISTRICTS. PROGRAM THAT WILL THE INTERDISTRICT TRANSFER WILL IMPROVE THE RACIAL $.00 1st Qtr Expend: $.00 3rd Qtr Expend: $.00 FTE: .00 $.00 2nd Qtr Expend: $.00 4th Qtr Expend: $.00 %Budget Spent: .00 % 15.1ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader 001482 Interdistrict School DIR SAO 002134 Interdistrict School Assoc Supt 002137 Interdistrict School Dir Staff Dev 002141 Interdistrict School Asst Supts 002151 Interdistrict School Asst Supts 002152 Interdistrict School Assoc ! 002168 Interdistrict School Assoc i 003152 Interdistrict School Assoc J 004137 Interdistrict School DIR SAO 004139 Interdistrict School DIR SAO Supt Supt Supt LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader COORD RECRUIT Dir SAO Asst Supt IS Principals Inte Principals Inte Dir SAO Dir SAO Dir SAO COORD RECRUIT COORD RECRUIT 15.2 Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date I I I LR LR LR I I TR TR 8 8 9 148 147 147 3 10 39 192 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 6/07/94 6/07/94 Report Date: Paget Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 52 Advertise M-to-M transfers to students Transfer Black Students from Romine to Baker Allow int.dist. sch stD.FROM CLINTON ATT. INC. SC. Operate/maintain King Interdst. School Operate Romine Conduct Recru itment Racially balance student pop. 60%-40% of either ra New Stephens to be built Pre-K through 6 located n Tell how white studs, will be recruit, for new Ste Court wants to know who will be responsible for reADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 53 Program Name: is Acad. Activities Program Code: 75 Primary Leader: Dir Staff Dev Secondary Leader Program Description: IN ADDITION TO THE REGULAR CURRICULUM PROGRAM, : Asst Supt IS FY Program Budget: YTD Expenditures: TIVE SCHOOLS TO ENHANCE STUDENT LEARNING. ARE INFUSED INTO THE CURRICULUM OP EACH ALSO PROVIDED. OTHER ACADEMIC PROGRAMS ARE AVAILABLE AT THE EXAMPLES INCLUDE THE SCHOOL THEMES. INCENTIVE SCHOOL. PEER TUTORS AND RETIRED TEACHER MENTORS MAY $36,663.00 1st Qtr Expend: $.00 INCENTHE SELECTED THEMES PEER-TUTORING/RETIRED TEACHER MENTORING IS  RECEIVE COMPENSATION. 3rd Qtr Expend: $7,966.18 FTE: .00 $27,994.02 2nd Qtr Expend: $4,308.16 4th Qtr Expend: $15,719.68 %Budget Spent\n76.35 % 16.1ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 54 001976 IS Acad. Activities 001977 IS Acad. Activities 001978 IS Acad. Activities 001979 IS Acad Activities Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS LR LR LR LR 154 154 154 154 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 Remedial classes will be available during instruct Computer generate Formative criterion-referenced t Utilize Heterogeneous grouping at each grade level Effective school model will be operative in incent 16.2ADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 55 Program Name: Program Code: IS Academic Programs 00 Primary Leader: Program Description: THE INCENTIVE SCHOOL ACADEMIC Dir Staff Dev Secondary Leader FY Program Budget: YTD Expenditures: RATE BROADER UNDERSTANDING OF THE REGULAR PROGRAM INCLUDES IDENTIFIED ENHANCEMENTS : Asst Supt IS CURRICULUM. THAT POTENTIALLY WILL GENECOMPUTER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, MENTORS, VOLUNTEERS, SCHOOL COMMUNITY. THE ENHANCEMENTS INCLUDES PEER TUTORING, PARENT CENTERS AND A SCHOOL THEME SELECTED BY THE $.00 1st Qtr Expend: $.00 3rd Qtr Expend: $.00 FTE: .00 $.00 2nd Qtr Expend: $.00 4th Qtr Expend: $.00 %Budget Spent: .00  17.1ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader 001685 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 001866 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 001867 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 001868 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 001869 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 001870 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 001872 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 001873 IS Academic Progreuns Dir Staff Dev 001874 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 001875 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 001876 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 001877 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 001878 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 001879 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 001880 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 001881 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 001882 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 001883 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 001884 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 001885 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 001886 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 001887 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 001888 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 001889 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 001890 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 001891 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 001892 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 001893 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 001894 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 001896 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 000036 LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Secondary Leader Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS ROCKEFELLER INCENTIVE MAGNET 3/25/96 DOC DOC DOC LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR  LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR STUDENT ART WORK DISPLAYED IN HALLWAYS 001897 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev 001912 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS LR LR Page Date 153 154 154 154 154 154 155 155 155 154 154 154 155 155 155 155 155 155 155 155 155 155 155 155 155 155 155 155 155 155 155 154 17.2 Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 56 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 Augment Programs to Meet Interest/Needs of Student Use the District model as the core curriculum for Use Learning to Read Thru Literature as primary re Use Basal textbooks to augment classics reading pr Place strong emphasis on critical reading skills g Increase motivation/learning with oral expression Expect Lang. Modeling in oral expression, vocab. \u0026lt; Emphasize the study of history from a subject area Emphasize introductory concepts in history, geo., Use Writing to Read as instructional component K-2 Use Writing Across the Curriculum to enhance writi Use Latin Program to increase vocabulary/word atta Teach geography through active learning strategies Include multicultural curriculum in each level of Promote \"living social studies\" Learning strategie Emphasize American and Arkansas History 4-5 Emphasize World History 6 Integrate celebrations/ceremonies into the curricu Emphasize use of word or story problems 2-6 Introduce basic concepts in geometry and algebra 2 Use manipulatives extensively Pre-K-3 Use computers to organize and utilize mathematical Emphasize critical thinking with methodology and r Use hands-on discovery/exploration to learn scient Supplement class and textbook work with practical Emphasize life sciences and physical sciences 4-6 Show mastery of concepts with an annual project Include information packets with homework assignme Include an introduction to basic concepts in music Emphasize enjoyment/creation of music, painting. a Emphasize penmanship at each level Emphasize Oral Lang Expression in reading and EnglID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader Secondary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date 001912 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff Dev Asst Supt IS LR 154 4/29/92 000036 001913 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff 001936 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff 001981 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff 001982 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff 001983 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff 001984 IS Academic Programs Dir Staff ROCKEFELLER INCENTIVE MAGNET Dev Dev Dev Dev Dev Dev Asst Supt IS Principal IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS LR MR LR LR LR LR 153 39 156 156 156 156 4/29/92 6/05/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 17.3 Report Date! Pagei Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 57 Emphasize Oral Lang Expression in reading and Engl Use Learning Styles Inventories in each incentive Establish scouting membership list Make Nifty Nutrition available for all Emphasize \"wellness\" for the young K-6 grades 1-6 Emphasize understanding \u0026amp; respect for the handicap Emphasize team sports and lifelong leisure skillsADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Program Name: Program Code: IS Extended Day/Heek 57 Primary Leader: Dir Staff Dev Secondary Leader : Principal IS Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 58 Program Description: AN AFTER-SCHOOL PROGRAM WILL BE PLANNED AT EACH SCHOOL TO MEET THE EDUCATIONAL, SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL NEEDS OF THE STUDENTS. STAFF AT THE SCHOOL WILL ASSIST IN IDENTIFYING PROGRAM AND RESOURCES TO ENHANCE STUDENT DEVELOPMENT. A MAJOR COMPONENT OF THE AFTER-SCHOOL PROGRAM IS THE HOMEWORK CENTER WHICH ASSIST STUDENTS WITH EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES THAT REINFORCE,MEDIATE, OR ENRICH CLASSROOM WORK. EXTENDED WEEK ACTIVITIES ARE PROVIDED THROUGH THE SATURDAY PROGRAM. THE SATURDAY PROGRAM INCLUDES COURSE OFFERINGS, FIELD TRIPS, TUTORING AND OTHER ACTIVITIES THAT ENRICH OR REINFORCE THE COGNITIVE SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL NEEDS OF THE STUDENTS. TRANSPORTATION IS PROVIDED. FY Program Budget: $440,719.00 1st Qtr Expend: $9,751.30 3rd Qtr Expend: $144,355.46 FTE: .00 YTD Expenditures: $551,783.88 2nd Qtr Expend: $112,740.93 4th Qtr Expend: $284,936.19 %Budget Spent: 125.20  18.1ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader Secondary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 59 DOC DOC DOC Page Date Abbreviated Text 001694 IS Extended Day/Week Dir Staff Dev 001700 IS Extended Day/Week Dir Staff Dev Principal IS Principal is MR MR 25 6/05/92 Keep statistics 25 6/05/92 on Conduct study to determine the Saturday Programs most appealing activiti 18.2 ADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Program Name: Program Code: IS Parent Involvemnt 00 Primary Leader: Dir Staff Dev Secondary Leader : Asst Supt IS Report Dates Page: 0/22/96 60 Program Description: THE PURPOSE OF PARENT INVOLVMENT IS TO MAKE PARENTS AND THE COMMUNITY THROUGHOUT PULASKI COUNTY KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT ALL SCHOOL OPTIONS AND ENCOURAGE VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT WHICH AIDS DESEGREGATION. PARENTS ARE INVOLVED IN SUPPORT ACTIVITIES RECRUITMENT AND THE PLANNING PROCESS. FY Program Budget: $.00 1st Qtr Expend: $.00 3rd Qtr Expend: $.00 FTE: .00 YTD Expenditures: $.00 2nd Qtr Expend: $.00 4th Qtr Expend: $.00 %Budget Spent: .00 % 19.1ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader Secondary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 61 001695 IS Parent Involvemnt Dir Staff 001696 IS Parent Involvemnt Dir Staff 001924 IS Parent Involvemnt Dir Staff 001929 IS Parent Involvemnt Dir Staff 001930 IS Parent Involvemnt Dir Staff 001932 IS Parent Involvemnt Dir Staff 001934 IS Parent Involvemnt Dir Staff 001937 IS Parent Involvemnt Dir Staff 001938 IS Parent Involvemnt Dir Staff 001942 IS Parent Involvemnt Dir Staff 001943 IS Parent Involvemnt Dir Staff Dev Dev Dev Dev Dev Dev Dev Dev Dev Dev Dev 001945 IS Parent Involvemnt Dir Staff Dev Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR 206 207 207 208 208 208 208 209 209 209 209 209 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 Include strategies for incorporating parental invo Design and administer a needs assessment Recruit parents from the incentive schools for tea Provide resources/staff to operate the center Train parent to operate the center Distribution of monthly communications packet Seek parentsrecommendation for resources Assist parents to carry out expections of schools Offer mini-workshops Provide opportunities for counselors Demonstrate the use of community resources Recognize parents monthly contact with 000036 3/25/96 ROCKEFELLER INCENTIVE MAGNET 001947 IS Parent Involvemnt Dir Staff 001949 IS Parent Involvemnt Dir Staff PARENTS RECOGNIZED FOR SERVICE BY Dev Dev PLACING THEIR 000036 3/25/96 Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS LR LR 209 210 4/29/92 4/29/92 Display parent/community recognition awards Involve students in selection process of award win ROCKEFELLER INCENTIVE MAGNET 001950 IS Parent Involvemnt Dir Staff 001951 IS Parent Involvemnt Dlr Staff 001953 IS Parent Involvemnt Dir Staff 001954 IS Parent Involvemnt Dir Staff 001955 IS Parent Involvemnt Dir Staff 001956 IS Parent Involvemnt Dir Staff 001958 IS Parent Involvemnt Dir Staff 001959 IS Parent Involvemnt Dir Staff 001960 IS Parent Involvemnt Dir Staff STUDENTS VOTE TO SELECT THE GOOD Dev Dev Dev Dev Dev Dev Dev Dev Dev 001965 IS Parent Involvemnt Dir Staff Dev 001969 IS Parent Involvemnt Dir Staff Dev Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS CITIZEN OF LR LR LR LR THE 210 4/29/92 Establish approach to communication between home/s 210 4/29/92 Identify three key parent 19.2 LR LR LR LR LR LR LR 210 210 210 210 211 211 211 212 213 4/29/92 4/29/92 communicators Establish community resource list Invite community patrons of pre-school 4/29/92 Encourage parent attendance 4/29/92 Prepare and distribute at PTA meetings Parent Handbooks 4/29/92 Require parents to call school 4/29/92 Require two or more home visits to report absences 4/29/92 4/29/92 Require contractual commitment from Use school as community center 4/29/92 Develop speakers bureau for parents communityADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Program Name: Program Code: IS Parent Recruitmnt 00 Primary Leader: Dir SAO Secondary Leader : Coord Recruit Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 62 Program Description! THE PURPOSE OF THE RECRUITMENT PROGRAM IS TO DEVISE A SYSTEM IN WHICH PARENTS THROUGHOUT PULASKI COUNTY ARE KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT ALL SCHOOL OPTIONS AND TO ENCOURAGE VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT WHICH AIDS DESEGREGATION. INCENTIVE SCHOOLS ARE LOCATED IN AREAS THAT ARE MAJORITY BLACK. SPECIAL PROGRAMS ARE OFFERED TO ATTRACT WHITE STUDENTS AS WELL AS INCREASE TEST SCORES. FY Program Budget: $.00 1st Qtr Expend: $.00 3rd Qtr Expend: $.00 FTE: .00 YTD Expenditures: $.00 2nd Qtr Expend: $.00 4th Qtr Expend: $.00 %Budget Spent: .00 % 20.1ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader Secondary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 63 001442 IS Parent Recruitmnt Dir SAO 001444 IS Parent Recruitmnt Dir SAO Coord Recruit Coord Recruit LR 215 LR 215 4/29/92 4/29/92 Information to community on Incentive school progr Conduct information sessions on pre-registration a 000064 1/22/96 2/01/96 001447 IS Parent Recruitmnt Dir SAO 001456 IS Parent Recruitmnt Dir SAO 001457 IS Parent Recruitmnt Dir SAO 001459 IS Parent Recruitmnt Dir SAO 001463 IS Parent Recruitmnt Dir SAO 001464 IS Parent Recruitmnt Dir SAO 001466 IS Parent Recruitmnt Dir SAO 001467 IS Parent Recruitmnt Dir SAO 001469 IS Parent Recruitmnt Dir SAO ASSC SUPT/ORGN. \u0026amp; LRNG EQUITY INSERVICE PRINCIPALS ON PREREGISTRATION INSERVICE SECRETARIES ON PRERIGISTRATION Coord Recruit Coord Recruit Coord Recruit Coord Recruit Coord Recruit Coord Recruit Co\u0026lt;5\u0026gt;rd Recruit Coord Recruit Coord Recruit LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR 20.2 215 216 216 216 216 216 216 216 217 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 Establish Saturday information booths Endorsements from local celebrities Hold meetings w/NLRSD/PCSSD TO ENCOURAGE M-M TRANS Provide public service announcements for Incentive DISTRIBUTE BROCHURES FOR INC, SCHOOLS THRU OUT PC CONDUCT Open house at Incentive schools Conduct small group tours Establish Speakers bureau for Incentive school Monitor/evaluate recruitment in Incentive schoolsADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Program Name: Program Code: IS Policies/Procedre 00 Primary Leader: Dir Staff Dev Secondary Leader : Principal IS Report Datet Page: 8/22/96 64 Program Description: EXTRACURRICULAR PROGRAMS HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED TO ALLOW STUDENTS RECOGNITION, LEADERSHIP EXPERIENCE, AND A CHANCE TO BE INVOLVED IN SCHOOL ACTIVITIES. FY Program Budget: $.00 1st Qtr Expend: $.00 3rd Qtr Expend: $.00 FTE: .00 YTD Expenditures: $.00 2nd Qtr Expend: $.00 4th Qtr Expend: $.00 %Budget Spent: .00 % 21.1ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader Secondary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET IXKUMENT Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date 001364 IS Policies/Procedre Dir Staff 001365 IS Policies/Procedre Dir Staff Dev Dev Principal IS Principal IS MR MR 38 38 6/05/92 6/05/92 000036 3/25/96 ROCKEFELLER INCENTIVE MAGNET 001672 IS Policies/Procedre Dir Staff 16 HOME VISITS WERE MADE THIS QUARTER Dev Principal IS HR 20 000036 3/25/96 ROCKEFELLER INCENTIVE MAGNET 001689 IS Policies/Procedre Dir Staff 001692 IS Policies/Procedre Dir Staff 002082 IS Policies/Procedre Dir Staff 002083 IS Policies/Procedre Dir Staff 002084 IS Policies/Procedre Dir Staff COE PLAN COMPLETED AND MONITORING Dev Dev Dev Dev Dev 002090 IS Policies/Procedre Dir Staff Dev 002094 IS Policies/Procedre Dir Staff 002095 IS Policies/Procedre Dir Staff 002103 IS Policies/Procedre Dir Staff Dev Dev Dev 002104 IS Policies/Procedre Dir Staff Dev 002105 IS Policies/Procedre Dir Staff 002106 IS Policies/Procedre Dir Staff 002107 IS Policies/Procedre Dir Staff Dev Dev Dev 002108 IS Policies/Procedre Dir Staff Dev 002110 IS Policies/Procedre Dir Staff 002111 IS Policies/Procedre Dir Staff Dev Dev Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Principal is Principal IS Principal is Principal IS Principal IS Principal IS Principal is Principal IS 000036 3/25/96 ROCKEFELLER INCENTIVE MAGNET 002112 IS Policies/Procedre Dir Staff PARENT SIGN-IN SHEETS KEPT AT Dev Principal IS 000036 3/25/96 ROCKEFELLER INCENTIVE MAGNET 002113 IS Policies/Procedre Dir Staff 002114 IS Policies/Procedre Dir Staff PTA EXECUTIVE MEETING MINUTES Dev Dev Principal IS Principal is Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 65 Document volunteer training Document visits to each students home 6/05/92 Develop a comprehensive long-range strategic plan VISIT CONDUCTED LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR MR HR HR MR HR HR HR HR 188 189 188 188 188 189 188 188 23 23 23 23 23 23 37 38 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 Establish a flexible programming approach Provide addt'l compensation for extra periods Allow for team teaching or other effective teachin Allow stud. to remain in class for extended time P 4/29/92 Develop a plan for individualized instruction with 4/29/92 Provide Saturday Enrichment Programs 4/29/92 Encourage PTA attendance 4/29/92 6/05/92 6/05/92 6/05/92 6/05/92 6/05/92 Provide Student Handbooks to each student Involve all affected in discipline policy developm Define appropriate and inappropr. behavior \u0026amp; conse Publicize policies and procedures Insist upon fair and consistent enforcement of dis Provide Teachers training in dealing with disrupt! 6/05/92 Collect discipline data and 6/05/92 6/05/92 monitor the program Maintain records of volunteer participation Maintain documentation of all parent meetings and EACH SCHOOL FUNCTION KEPT ON 21.2 MR 38 6/05/92 Routinely record meeting agenda and minutes FILE IN MR 38 MR 38 6/05/92 6/05/92 Establish a mechanism to ensure that parents sign Have contracts ready for parents to sign when theyADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Program Name: Program Code: IS Social Skills 00 Primary Leader: Dir Staff Dev Secondary Leader : Asst Supt IS Report Date s Page: 8/22/96 66 Program Description: THE SOCIAL SKILLS PROGRAM WAS DESIGNED TO PROVIDE SUPPORTIVE EXPERIENCES THAT WILL ENHANCE LEARNING FOR STUDENTS ATTENDING AN INCENTIVE SCHOOL. FY Program Budget: $.00 1st Qtr Expend: $.00 3rd Qtr Expend: $.00 FTE: .00 YTD Expenditures: $.00 2nd Qtr Expend: $.00 4th Qtr Expend: $.00 %Budget Spent: .00 % 22.1ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAN BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Date: Paget Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 67 001680 IS Social Skills 001899 IS Social Skills 001901 IS Social Skills 001902 IS Social Skills 001919 IS Social Skills 001920 IS Social Skills 001921 IS Social Skills 001990 IS Social Skills 001993 IS Social Skills 002102 IS Social Skills Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Principal IS Principal is Principal IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS LR LR LR LR MR NR MR LR LR LR 22.2 156 156 156 156 29 29 29 157 157 175 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 6/05/92 6/05/92 6/05/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 Prepare students to become independ, thinkers \u0026amp; pr Teach social skills through the core instructional Teach Structured self-esteem building lessons in s Focus on problem-solving, decision-making, peer pr Mount recruitment campaign Coordinate mentor program with VIPS Record/Maintain documentation on mentors, students Create program to respond to developmental changes Use individuals presentations to provide role mode Increase opport, for services through serv. agencyADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Program Name: Program Code: IS Staff Development 73 Primary Leader: Dir Staff Dev Secondary Leader : Principal IS Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 68 Program Description: THE PURPOSE OF A WELL-DEVELOPED STAFF DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM IS TO PROVIDE STAFF MEMBERS THE NECESSARY SKILLS TO IMPROVE STUDENTS' COGNITIVE, SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL GROWTH. CONTINUOUS TRAINING WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE STAFF DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND IRC SPECIALIST BASED ON THE NEEDS OF THE STAFF AND THE STUDENTS AS EVIDENCED BY IDENTIFIED NEEDS. THE LRSD STAFF DEVELOPMENT DEPT. WILL ACT AS A FACILITATOR FOR THE SCHOOL STAFF DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEES BY COORDINATING, ARRANGING AND GATHERING MATERIALS. FY Program Budget: $27,696.00 1st Qtr Expend: $.00 3rd Qtr Expend: $200.00 FTE: .00 YTD Expenditures: $.00 2nd Qtr Expend: $353.61 4th Qtr Expend: $385.46 %Budget Spent: 3.39  23.1ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader Secondary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUE\u0026gt;GET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Report Date: Paget 8/22/96 69 DOC DOC DOC Abbreviated Text Page Date 001799 IS Staff Development Dir Staff 001847 IS Staff Development Dir Staff 001848 IS Staff Development Dir Staff 001849 IS Staff Development Dir Staff 001850 IS Staff Development Dir Staff 001851 IS Staff Development Dir Staff 001852 IS Staff Development Dir Staff 001854 IS Staff Development Dir Staff 001855 IS Staff Development Dir Staff 001856 IS Staff Development Dir Staff Dev Dev Dev Dev Dev Dev Dev Dev Dev Dev Principal is Principal IS Principal IS Principal IS Principal is Principal is Principal IS Principal IS Principal IS Principal IS CO MR MR MR MR MR MR MR MR MR 42 7 7 8 8 11 11 14 14 14 5/01/92 6/05/92 6/05/92 6/05/92 6/05/92 6/05/92 6/05/92 6/05/92 6/05/92 6/05/92 Identify the staff development needs Develop strategy to meet staff development require Record School Profile staff development data Evaluate classroom utilization of inservice train! Evaluate quality, relevance, and adequacy of staff Promote staff awareness of heterogeneous grouping Ensure all incentive school staff participate TESA Emphasize staff training that facilitates Emphasize active 1 importance of variety in teaching techn Use a wide range of resources and specialistADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Report Date: Paget 8/22/96 70 Program Name: Program Code: IS Staffing 72 Primary Leader: Dir Staff Dev Secondary Leader : Asst Supt IS Program Description: THIS PROGRAM IS DESIGNED TO INCLUDE A COMMITTEE OP PARENTS, TEACHERS, AND ADMINISTRATORS WHO WILL ASSIST IN SETTING CRITERIA FOR INTERVIEWS AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR HIRING QUALITY STAFF WHO WILL IMPLEMENT THE GOALS, PROGRAMS AND CURRICULUM IN THE INCENTIVE SCHOOLS. FY Program Budget: $581,135.13 1st Qtr Expend: $51,226.85 3rd Qtr Expend: $142,894.35 FTE: 19.34 YTD Expenditures: $574,809.28 2nd Qtr Expend: $138,877.71 4th Qtr Expend: $241,810.37 %Budget Spent: 98.91 % 24.1ADDENDUM ID Program Name Primary Leader Secondary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date 001792 IS Staffing 001794 IS Staffing Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS LR LR 198 198 4/29/92 4/29/92 000026 GARLAND INCENTIVE MAGNET 1/30/96 001860 IS Staffing Dir Staff Dev MR, WARD CONDUCTED TEACHER OBSERVATIONS Asst Supt IS LR 194 4/29/92 Report Datet Paget Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 71 Review staff commitment informally Monitor staff effectiveness Use student teachers from different colleges 24.2ADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Program Name: Program Code: IS Student Achievmnt 00 Primary Leader: Dir Staff Dev Secondary Leader : Asst Supt IS Report Date t Page: 8/22/96 72 Program Description: THIS PROGRAM IS INTENDED TO PROVIDE SUPPORTIVE EXPERIENCES THAT WILL ENHANCE LEARNING FOR STUDENTS ATTENDING THE INCENTIVE SCHOOLS. FY Program Budget: $.00 1st Qtr Expend: $.00 3rd Qtr Expend: $.00 FTE: .00 YTD Expenditures: $.00 2nd Qtr Expend: $.00 4th Qtr Expend: $.00 %Budget Spent: .00 % 25.1ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader Secondary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date 001704 IS Student Achievmnt Dir Staff Dev Asst Supt IS LR 158 4/29/92 000036 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 ROCKEFELLER INCENTIVE MAGNET FIELD TRIPS FOR 4TH QUARTER - ROBINSON CENTER MUSI HALL, FIRE STATION, PARKVIEW MAGNET, PINNACLE MT., HEIFER PROJECT, CAREER AWARENESS FIELD TRIP, CENTER PLAY, MCARTHUR PARK, WASTE WATER FAIR, ARTS HOT 001705 IS Student Achievmnt Dir Staff 001706 IS Student Achievmnt Dir Staff SPRINGS MUSEUM, AR MUSEUM OF SCIENCE \u0026amp; HISTORY, TOLTEC STATE PARK, PLANTATION AGRICULTURAL MUSEUM, CTA, CAMP STOREY-GIRL SCOUTS, CENTERS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES, RIVER FEST-SHOW CHOIR, LITTLE ROCK CLUB-6TH GRADE LUNCH, TERRITORIAL RESTORATION, SCOTT MUSEUM, WILDRIVER COUNTRY-GIRL SCOUTS, UALR FINE ARTS CENTER-SHOW CHOIR Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 73 Use field trips to enhance learning 001987 IS Student Achievmnt Dir 001988 IS Student Achievmnt Dir 001989 IS Student Achievmnt Dir Dev Dev Staff Dev Staff Dev Staff Dev Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS LR LR LR LR LR 158 158 157 157 157 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 Supplement local field trips with state/national Determine choices by school needs/interests Use peer tutors to assist Teachers Use Academic Reinforcement Clubs Use a variety of Special Interest Clubs t 35.2ADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Report Dates Page: 8/22/96 74 Program Name: Program Code: IS Support Programs 00 Primary Leader: Dir Staff Dev Secondary Leader : Asst Supt IS Program Description: INCENTIVE SCHOOL SUPPORT PROGRAMS ARE THOSE ACTIVITIES/STRATEGIES THAT REINFORCE OR ENHANCE THE OPPORTUNITIES FOR LEARNING AT THE INCENTIVE SCHOOLS. EXAMPLES INCLUDE: HOMEWORK CENTERS, INSTRUCTIONAL AIDES, EXTENDED YEAR PROGRAM AND FIELD TRIPS. FY Program Budget: $.00 1st Qtr Expend: $.00 3rd Qtr Expend: $.00 FTE: .00 YTD Expenditures: $.00 2nd Qtr Expend: $.00 4th Qtr Expend: $.00 %Budget Spent: .00 % 26.1ID ADDENDUM ProgreuQ Name Primary Leader Secondary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 75 001667 IS Support Programs 001668 IS Support Programs 001687 IS Support Programs 001688 IS Support Programs 001690 IS Support Programs 001691 IS Support Programs 001701 IS Support Programs 001712 IS Support Programs 001713 IS Support Programs Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR 000036 3/25/96 3/25/96 ROCKEFELLER INCENTIVE MAGNET 178 178 180 180 179 171 175 180 180 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 Permanently assign substitutes to each incentive s Create school site teams Offer Special skills programs after school Provide supervision of students at the incentive s Offer field trips during extended week programs Provide trans to students at the Homework Center Attendance/behavior guidelines assist studs. Provide training for Teachers in peer tutoring Use retired Teachers mentors to tutor and \u0026amp; kee sponsor 001716 IS Support Program 001717 IS Support Programs 001726 IS Support Programs Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev ONE RETIRED TEACHER CONTINUES TO MENTOR ONE RETIRED TEACHER SERVES ON STAFFING ( COMMITTEE 000036 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 001727 IS Support Programs 001729 IS Support Programs 001731 IS Support Program 001734 IS Support Programs 001735 IS Support Programs 001736 IS Support Programs 001738 IS Support Programs 001741 IS Support Progrcuns 001744 IS Support Progreuns 001745 IS Support Program 001746 IS Support Programs 001758 IS Support Programs 001761 IS Support Program^ 001762 IS Support Programs Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS LR LR LR 172 172 176 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 Implement a career skills development Use a variety of means to create program Use a variety of methods for recognition career awareness ROCKEFELLER INCENTIVE MAGNET Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev GOOD CITIZEN MONTHLY, SUPER CITIZEN QUARTERLY, HONORS RECEPTION, MOST IMPROVED, 4TH NINE WEEKS-AWARDS CERTIFICATES Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR 26.2 185 185 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 187 187 187 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 Work community to supplement school programs Work with Campt Pfiefer Dir. to target incentive Obtain information regarding student academic s grow Track attendance/discipline/behavior/achievement. Monitor quarterly Maintan class and school profiles Involve parents in the development SEPs Include extracurricular activities Involve staff, patrons in monitoring Involve all staff in goal setting Evaluate goal achievement Establish School Improvement Teams Plan for parent/student meetings for input. Plan for implementation of changes.ID ADDENDUM Program Name Prijnary Leader 001762 IS Support Programs Dir Staff Dev 000036 001763 IS Support Programs 001764 IS Support Programs 001765 IS Support Programs 001915 IS Support Programs 001916 IS Support Programs 001917 IS Support Programs 002029 IS Support Programs 002032 IS Support Prograuns 002034 IS Support Programs 002035 IS Support Programs 002036 IS Support Programs 002042 IS Support Programs 002046 IS Support Programs 002047 IS Support Programs 002050 IS Support Programs 002054 IS Support Programs 002055 IS Support Programs 002056 IS Support Programs 002057 IS Support Programs 002059 IS Support Programs 002063 IS Support Programs 002064 IS Support Programs 002065 IS Support Programs 002067 IS Support Programs 002068 IS Support Programs 002071 IS Support Programs 002074 IS Support Programs 002075 IS Support Programs 002076 IS Support Programs LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Secondary Leader Asst Supt IS ROCKEFELLER INCENTIVE MAGNET Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS Asst Supt IS 26.3 DOC DOC DOC Page Date LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR 187 187 187 187 180 180 180 172 173 181 181 181 183 183 183 183 183 183 183 184 184 184 184 184 184 184 184 184 184 175 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 Report Date: Paget Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 76 Plan for implementation of changes. Make recommendations for changes. Implement changes. Evaluate changes Mentors provide support Provide Homework Centers Set homework center schedules to meet students nee Develop year round school program Bring exhibits and performances to the schools. Build a program of community involvement Establish Girl/Boy Scout Programs at each school. Offer special skills programs after school Make parents aware of the options open to their ch Provide students with exper. in testing,listening Hold home/neighborhood meetings to increase involv Involve ministers. Provide regular communication between school and h Encourage parents to provide classroom support Establish place for designated meetings Establish learning time schedules for extended day Improve home/school communication. Give students recognition and leadership opportuni Implement individual and group counseling for all Include Peer facilitators Teach conflict resolution Implement Incentive/recognition programs by 1990-9 Create Community involvement recognition. Conduct Student Screening Make presentations to parents on similar topics Provide time out areasADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 77 Program Name: Program Code: Library/Media Svs 32 Primary Leader: Program Description: EACH CHILD IN THE Supt Secondary Leader LRSD SHOULD BE GIVEN ACCESS TO HIS/HER : Dir Media/Tech FY Program Budget: YTD Expenditures: SOURCES. LIBRARY/MEDIA SERVICES WILL FULL MEASURE OF THE INSTRUCTIONAL RESKILLS AND WILL ALSO ACCOMMODATE BE DESIGNED TO PROVIDE FOR EXTENSION AND GROUPS. BECAUSE STUDENTS WILL HAVE OPPORTUNITIES THE VARIED LEARNING STYLES OF STUDENTS THE DIRECTION OF A TRAINED TEACHER-LIBRARIAN, WAYS, THUS ACCOMMODATING THEIR INDIVIDUAL ON TASK\" SENTED. OR ENRICHMENT THAT MANY STUDENTS $409,808.64 1st Qtr Expend: ENRICHMENT OF BASIC IN DIFFERENT INSTRUCTIONAL TO WORK AND LEARN IN THE LIBRARY/MEDIA CENTER THEY WILL BE ABLE TO APPROACH LEARNING STYLES AND ALSO PROVIDING FOR THE ADDITIONAL \"TIME NEED IN ORDER TO INTERNALIZE THE MATERIAL $32,881.28 3rd Qtr Expend: UNDER IN A VARIETY OF INITIALLY PRE- $103,964.31 FTE: 16.00 $379,559.68 2nd Qtr Expend: $111,904.76 4th Qtr Expend: $130,809.33 %Budget Spent: 92.62  27.1ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Date: Paget Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 78 001007 Library/Media Svs 001010 Library/Media Svs 001020 Library/Media Svs 001022 Library/Media Svs 001023 Library/Media Svs 001024 Library/Media Svs 001025 Library/Media Svs 001046 Library/Media Svs 001047 Library/Media Svs 001048 Library/Media Svs Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Dir Media/Tech Dir Media/Tech Dir Media/Tech Dir Media/Tech Dir Media/Tech Dir Media/Tech Dir Media/Tech Dir Media/Tech Dir Media/Tech Dir Media/Tech LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR 109 109 110 107 107 107 107 107 107 107 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 Schedule filmsXvideos as possible Supply films/videos per schedule Conduct inservice for librarians and library clerk Library media specialists will plan with teachers Library media specialists will plan with staff for Library media specialists will plan with teachers Library media specialists will instruct students i Increase vol. of books checked out Document number of students visiting library Document number of classes scheduled 27.2ADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/3 Program Budget Document Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 79 Program Name: Program Code: M to M Magnet Prgrm 18 Program Description: H TO M MAGNETS Primary Leader: Assoc Supt FY Program Budget: YTD Expenditures: attract STUDENTS FROM NLRSD are those schools where specialized located at CENTRAL HIGH $359,648.82 $374,977.20 Secondary Leader : Dir SAO AND PCSSD WHO ARE ELIGIBLE PROGRAMS HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED SCHOOL, DUNBAR, WASHINGTON, 1st Qtr Expend: $29,464.29 IN ORDER TO FOR M TO M TRANSFERS. M TO M PROGRAMS ARE HENDERSON AND MCCLELLAN. 3rd Qtr Expend: $77,387.12 FTE: 7.40 2nd Qtr Expend: $109,025.66 4th Qtr Expend: $160,099.73 %Budget Spent: 104.26  28.1ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Datex Paget Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 80 000931 M to M Magnet Prgrm 000932 M to M Magnet Prgrm 002196 M to M Magnet Prgrm 002197 M to M Magnet Prgrm 002198 M to M Magnet Prgrm Assoc Assoc Assoc Assoc Assoc Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Dir SAO Dir SAO Dir SAO Dir SAO Dir SAO 28.2 LR LR LR LR LR 142 142 144 143 143 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 SAO assigns students to Henderson Jr. High Magnet SAO assigns students to McClellan High Magnet Assign students to Washington Magnet School by SA Assign students to Central High Magnet School by S Assign students to Ehinbar Magnet Jr. High by SAOADDENDUM LRSD EY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 81 Program Name: M to M Transfers Program Code: oo Primary Leader: Assoc Supt Program Description: THE M TO M TRANSFER ALLOWS Secondary Leader FY Program Budget: YTD Expenditures: IN A DISTRICT WHERE THEIR RACE AND LRSD MEET THE DESGREGATION STUDENTS TO VOLUNTARILY TRANSFER IS UNDER-REPRESENTED. I Dir SAO OUT OF THEIR DISTRICT AND ATTEND SCHOOL GOALS OUTLINED IN THE DESEGREGATION THE TRANSFER PROGRAM HAS ASSISTED PCSSD, NLRSD PLAN. $.00 1st Qtr Expend: $.00 3rd Qtr Expend: $.00 FTE: .00 $.00 2nd Qtr Expend: $.00 4th Qtr Expend: $.00 %Budget Spent: .00 % 29.1ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Page Date 003024 M to H Transfers Assoc 003025 H to M Transfers Assoc 003026 M to M Transfers Assoc 003027 M to M Transfers Assoc 003029 M to M Transfers Assoc 003030 M to M Transfers Assoc 003031 M to M Transfers Assoc 003032 M to M Transfers Assoc 003033 M to M Transfers Assoc Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Dir SAO Dir SAO Dir SAO Dir SAO Dir SAO Dir SAO Dir SAO Dir SAO Dir SAO ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 003034 M to M Transfers Assoc Supt Dir SAO ST 3 003035 M to M Transfers SUPT ASST SUPTS ST 3 003037 M to M Transfers Assoc 003040 M to M Transfers Assoc 003041 M to M Transfers Assoc Supt Supt Supt Dir SAO Dir SAO Dir SAO ST ST ST 3 3 4 003043 M to M Transfers ASST SUPTS PRINCIPALS ST 4 003044 M to M Transfers Asst supts PRINCIPALS ST 4 003045 M to M Transfers AssT SUPTS PRINCIPALS ST 4 003047 M to M Transfers 003048 M to M Transfers 003049 M to M Transfers 003050 N to M Transfers 003051 M to M Transfers 003052 M to M Transfers 003054 M to M Transfers Mng Mng Mng Mng Mng Mng Mng Sup Serv Sup Serv Sup Serv Sup Sup Sup Sup Serv Serv Serv Serv 003056 M to M Transfers 003057 M to M Transfers 003154 M to M Transfers Assoc Supt Assoc Supt DIR SAO Mng Finance Mng Finance Mng Finance Mng Finance Mng Finance Mng Finance Mng Finance Dir SAO Dir SAO COORD RECRUIT 29.2 ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST I 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 7 11 8/26/86 8/26/86 8/26/86 8/26/86 8/26/86 8/26/86 8/26/86 8/26/86 8/26/86 8/26/86 8/26/86 8/26/86 8/26/86 8/26/86 8/26/86 8/26/86 8/26/86 8/26/86 8/26/86 8/26/86 8/26/86 8/26/86 8/26/86 8/26/86 8/26/86 8/26/86 4/29/92 Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 82 Follow M-M eligibility guidelines Blhs. in major, at sch. \u0026amp; (dist. 50%+) may go to s Whts. in major, at sch. \u0026amp; dist. may go to sch. \u0026amp; d Hm. dist. to verify good standing or may go on pro File studs, application in home dist. by May 1 of Allow only one transfer per student during any yea Process home dist. appl. \u0026amp; forward copies to host Furnish complete student file with appl. by Home d Transf. dependent on host 's space in sch., grade, Communicate acceptance to parent Nay make better place, end of 1st sem. with tests. Commit, for duration of stud's, vol. part. (1 yr. Studs, expected to follow feeder pattern of assign Host has author, to disc., suspend, expel with due Host must make policies, proced., \u0026amp; expect, availa Host must ignore transfer status of stud, when res Encourage all M-Ns to participate in all programs ADE \u0026amp; Districts to follow payment procedures ADE to pay cost of K-12 FTE students to host dist. Current yr. payments based on previous school year Host to report M-Ms to ADE on forms provided Host to estimate \u0026amp; forward FTE of students to ADE ADE to pay monthly with correction in January ADE pays home dist. .5 of table rate Sp. Ed. transfers allowed based on available servi Host can opt. to count or not count M-M for stud. Parties to promote M-M transfersADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 83 Program Name: Program Code: McClellan Comm. Sch. 26 Primary Leader: Program Description: THE MCCLELLAN COMMUNITY Asst Supt Sec Secondary Leader FY Program Budget: YTD Expenditures: MAKING IT THE CENTER OF MANY ACTIVITIES SCHOOL PROVIDES PROGRAMS AND SERVICES CHOR FOR THE COMMUNITY, AND MUCH COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT. : Principal McCl WHICH EXPAND THE USE OF THE FACILITY, A FOCAL POINT OF INTENSE INTEREST, ACTIVITY AND LOYALTY. THE SCHOOL SERVES AS AN AN$ 40,000.00 1st Qtr Expend: $.00 3rd Qtr Expend: $.00 FTE: .00 $.00 2nd Qtr Expend: $.00 4th Qtr Expend: $40,000.00 %Budget Spent: 100.00 % 30.1ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader 003215 McClellan Comm. Sch. Asst Supt Sec 003216 McClellan Comm. Sch. Asst Supt Sec 003217 McClellan Comm. Sch. Asst Supt Sec LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Datet Page: Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 84 Principal McCl Principal McCl Principal McCl LR LR LR 94 94 94 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 Solicit ccxnmunity input throughout the entire proc Program will reflect the community's needs and wis Com. will report their progress regularly to LRSD, 30.2ADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 85 Program Name: Program Code: McClellan Magnet 00 Primary Leader: Assoc Supt Program Description: MCCLELLAN BUSINESS/COMMUNICATIONS Secondary Leader : Dir SAO FY Program Budget: YTD Expenditures: COMPETENCE IN ACADEMIC SKILLS AND CONCEPTS MAGNET PROGRAM PROVIDES A LEARNING ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM ARE PROVIDED WITH MARKETABLE SKILLS IN VARIOUS IN RELATED TO BUSINESS/COMMUNICATION. FIELDS OF BUSINESS. $.00 1st Qtr Expend: $.00 $.00 2nd Qtr Expend: $.00 31.1 THAT DEVELOPS STUDENTS IN THE 3rd Qtr Expend: 4th Qtr Expend: $.00 FTE: $.00 %Budget Spent: .00 .00 %ADDENDUM LRSD PROGRAM BUEXSET DOCUMENT Legal Reference ID Program Name Primary Leader Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Page Date 003062 McClellan Magnet Assoc Supt Dir SAO MC 2 5/01/92 31.2 Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 86 Use Program to Achieve Racial BalanceADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 87 Program Name: Program Code: Multicultural Curr. 12 Primary Leader: Dir Staff Dev Program Description: THE MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM PROGRAM Secondary Leader t Curr Supvs FY Program Budget: YTD Expenditures: AND PROGRAM AREAS IN LRSD. IS DESIGNED TO PROVIDE EQUITY AND EXCELLENCE THE PROGRAM IS FURTHER DESIGNED TO REDUCE WEEN BLACK AND WHITE STUDENTS IN ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN ADVANCED PLACEMENT COURSES AS WELL AS IN SPECIAL COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED IN THE MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM IN ALL CURRICULAR THE DISPARITY THAT EXIST BETAND THE LOW REPRESENTATION OF BLACK STUDENTS ACTIVITIES, AND SPECIAL PROGRAMS. TO ACHIEVE THE BE USED IN SCHOOLS AND TEACHERS WILL RECEIVE EXTENSIVE, PROGRAM, MULTICULTURAL CURRICULUM GUIDES WILL ONGOING STAFF DEVELOPMENT. $123,868.60 1st Qtr Expend: $11,354.76 3rd Qtr Expend: $33,610.84 FTE: 5.00 $100,674.68 2nd Qtr Expend: $23,348.05 4th Qtr Expend: $32,361.03 %Budget Spent: 81.28 32.1 % ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 88 000103 Multicultural Curr. 000120 Multicultural Curr. 000144 Multicultural Curr. Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev 000163 Multicultural Curr. 000164 Multicultural Curr. 000166 Multicultural Curr. 000174 Multicultural Curr. 000176 Multicultural Curr. 000177 Multicultural Curr. 000178 Multicultural Curr. 000179 Multicultural Curr. 000180 Multicultural Curr. 000181 Multicultural Curr. 000183 Multicultural Curr. 000184 Multicultural Curr. 000192 Multicultural Curr. 000195 Multicultural Curr. 000198 Multicultural Curr. 000199 Multicultural Curr. 000203 Multicultural Curr. 000207 Multicultural Curr. 000222 Multicultural Curr. 000455 Multicultural Curr. Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Dir Staff Dev Supt Asst Supts Curr Supvs Curr Supvs Curr Supvs Curr Supvs Curr Supvs Curr Supvs Curr Supvs Curr Supvs Curr Supvs Curr Supvs Curr Supvs Curr Supvs Curr Supvs Curr Supvs Curr Supvs Curr Supvs Curr Supvs Curr Supvs Curr Supvs Curr Supvs Curr Supvs Asst Supts Principals LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR I LR 66 68 71 74 76 75 76 77 77 77 77 77 77 78 78 78 79 79 79 79 80 7 35 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 Obtain Info on Multi-Cultural Courses from College Develop Criteria for Textbook Review/Adoption Extend Inservice Through Cluster Mtgs. Monitor Use of Curr. Guides Provide Staff Dev. Extend inservice through council mtgs. per named Meet to Discuss Promotional Seminars Share Effective Strategies at Council Mtgs. Purchase Science Supplies Purchase Math Manipulatives Purchase trade books for wholeness of lang. Provide Inservice on science, math, and trade book Identify teacher needs using performance data Schedule Teacher Inservice Monitor Teachers Use of Strategies Monitor Implementation of Strategies Ensure increased equity through inservice Assess Current Textbooks Identify Deficiencies in Textbooks Select Text Free of Stereotypes Monitor Use of Curriculum Guide Form Committee to Review Curriculum Requirements f Create Academic Intervention Strategies 000002 HALL HIGH SCHOOL 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 3/25/96 LAP/MATH PLUS PROGRAMS IN OPERATION MORNING, LUNCH, AFTER-SCHOOL TUTORING BY INDIVIDUA TEACHERS (ONGOING) NEWCOMERS PROG. (LEP) LIMITED ENG. PROFICIENCY IN OPERATION 32.2ADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 89 Program Name: Program Code: New Futures 00 Primary Leader: Supt Secondary Leader : Coord New Fut Program Description: THE PURPOSE OF THE NEW FUTURES JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL RESTRUCTURING INITIATIVE IS TO ESTABLISH A SCHOOL CLIMATE, CULTURE, AND CURRICULUM THAT IS RESPONSIVE TO THE DEVELOPMENTAL NEEDS OF EARLY ADOLESCENT YOUTH AND THE PARTICULAR NEEDS OF AT-RISK STUDENTS. THE SCOPE AND CONTENT OF THE PROGRAM FOCUSES ON THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF (1) SCHOOL RESTRUCTURING WHICH ENGAGES TEACHERS AND ADMINISTRATORS IN THE LONG-TERM PROCESS OF EXPANDING THEIR THINKING AND ENGAGE IN BASIC FUNDAMENTAL CHANGES AROUND ISSUES THAT AFFECT HOW THEY TEACH AND SUPPORT ALL STUDENTS UTILIZING THE SITE-BASED MANAGEMENT (2) DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING MIDDLE SCHOOL PRACTICES AND PROGRAMS IMPLEMENTING SPECIFIC INTERVENTION PROGRAMS AND PRACTICES FOR AT-RISK YOUTH (3) DEVELOPING AND THROUGH SCHOOL IMPROVE- MENT WHICH MAY BE BASED ON THE EFFECTIVE SCHOOL RESEARCH. RESTRUCTURING SCHOOLS ARE: CLOVERDALE JUNIOR HIGH, PULASKI HEIGHTS JUNIOR HIGH, SOUTHWEST JUNIOR HIGH AND FOREST HEIGHTS JUNIOR HIGH. FY Program Budget: $.00 1st Qtr Expend: $.00 3rd Qtr Expend: $.00 FTE: .00 YTD Expenditures: $.00 2nd Qtr Expend: $.00 4th Qtr Expend: $.00 %Budget Spent: .00 % 33.1ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader 000810 New Futures Supt LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference Secondary Leader Coord New Put 33.2 DOC DOC DOC Page Date LR 145 Report Datet Page: Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 90 4/29/92 Assist Teaching Teams in Developing Incentive ProgADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Report Datei Page: 8/22/96 91 Program Name: Program Code: Original Magnets 14 Primary Leader: Assoc Supt Program Description: THE PURPOSE OF THE ORIGINAL MAGNETS IS TO OFFER Secondary Leader  Dir SAO FY Program Budget: YTD Expenditures: STUDENTS FROM NEIGHBORING DISTRICTS. AN ATTRACTIVE ACADEMIC PROGRAM THAT WILL ATTRACT ESTABLISHED IN 1987-88. LRSD SHALL CONTINUE TO OPERATE THE INTERDISTRICT MAGNET THOSE SCHOOLS SHALL BE RACTAT.T.V BALANCED TO A POINT BLACK AND WILL BE OPEN TO STUDENTS IN THE THREE DISTRICTS. DESIGNED TO MAXIMIZE PARTICIPATION IN MAGNET SCHOOLS UP SCHOOLS OF BETWEEN 50% AND 55% LRSD WILL ENGAGE IN RECRUITMENT EFFORTS FEBRUARY 27, 1987 ORDER. ALL INTERDISTICT AND MAGNET SCHOOLS SHALL BE OPEN OUTSIDE PULASKI COUNTY. TO THE LEVELS SET FORTH IN THE COURTS TO STUDENTS WHO RESIDE $4,336,650.00 1st Qtr Expend: $.00 3rd Qtr Expend: $1,503,150.75 FTE: .00 $4,472,530.11 2nd Qtr Expend: $1,546,290.00 4th Qtr Expend: $1,423,089.36 %Budget Spent: 103.13 % 34.1ADDENDUM LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Legal Reference ID Program Name Primary Leader Secondary Leader DOC DOC DOC Page Date Report Date: Pagex Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 92 001336 Original Magnets 001489 Original Magnets 001490 Original Magnets 002173 Original Magnets 002175 Original Magnets 003103 Original Magnets 003105 Original Magnets 003107 Original Magnets 003108 Original Magnets 003110 Original Magnets 003111 Original Magnets 003117 Original Magnets 003118 Original Magnets 003123 Original Magnets 003124 Original Magnets 003125 Original Magnets 003126 Original Magnets 003127 Original Magnets 003128 Original Magnets 003130 Original Magnets 003131 Original Magnets 003134 Original Magnets 003135 Original Magnets 003136 Original Magnets 005125 Original Magnets Assoc Supt ASSTS supts Dir SAO Dir SAO PRINCIPALS Coord Recruit I 5 I 4 I 4 Dir SAO MNG SUP SERV Mng ! Mng : Mng ! Mng : Mng ! Mng Mng ! Mng Assoc Sup Sup Sup Sup Sup Sup Serv Serv Serv Serv Serv Serv Assoc Assoc Assoc Assoc Assoc Assoc Assoc Sup Serv Sup Serv Supt : Supt Supt : Supt Supt : Supt : Supt\nSupt MNG SUP SERV SUPT AssT SUPTS ASSOC SUPT Coord Recruit Mng FINANCE Mng Finance Mng Finance Mng Finance Mng Finance Mng Finance Mng Finance Mng Finance Mng Finance Dir SAO Dir SAO Dir SAO Dir SAO Dir SAO Dir SAO Dir SAO Dir SAO MNG FINANCE ASSOC SUPT PRINCIPALS INTER AssT SUPTS 34.2 I 4 SA ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST ST CO 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 S 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 7 8 2 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 9/28/89 2/16/87 2/16/87 2/16/87 2/16/87 2/16/87 2/16/87 2/16/87 2/16/87 2/16/87 2/16/87 2/16/87 2/16/87 2/16/87 2/16/87 2/16/87 2/16/87 2/16/87 2/16/87 2/16/87 2/02/95 Permit assign, of students outside Pul.Cty. to sei Operate and maintain the original magnet schools Conduct appropriate recruitment strategies PCSSD/NLRSD/LRSD engage\u0026amp;PUBLIZE in recruit MAGNET LRSD contrib. towards the costs of 6 magnet school Parties agree to financing formula proposed by MRC Pay customary state aid by ADE Dist. not filling seat req. to pay host debt serv. Provide separate accounting \u0026amp; budgeting to MRC by Entire costs of magnet \u0026amp; M-M trnfrs. including ext Use cost-effective measures by Distr. Inter. Trans. Plan adm. by Interdistrict Transport Composed ITA of rep. from each dist. \u0026amp; ADE Reserve 25% of total seats to shadow zone (Host Di Reserve remain. 75% proport, to stud. pop. of ttl. Determine racial balance of seats determ, as in S6 Ttl. seats for NLRSD not to exceed 475 (no more th Allocated seats by org. level and not by school MRC may approve exception if overage for dist., Fill unfilled seats by other districts to avoid va Follow targeted ratios in Stipulation 2/16/87 New grants, monies shall be applied off the top to Cooperate in dev. of any future magnet grants by p Respon. of host shall be the daily admin, of magn LRSD must consult with the MRC prior to making decADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 93 Program Name: Program Code: Parent Invl:Tri-Dis 00 Primary Leader: Dir SAO Program Description: PARENT INVOLVEMENT IS CRITICAL TO THE SUCCESS Secondary Leader : Coord Recruit MAKE PARENTS (AND THE COMMUNITY) THROUGHOUT PULASKI COUNTY KNOWLEDGEABLE OF THE CHILD. THE PURPOSE OF PARENT INVOLVEMENT IS TO AND ENCOURAGE VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT WHICH AIDS DESEGREGATION. ACTIVITIES, RECRUITMENT AND THE PLANNING PROCESS. ABOUT ALL SCHOOL OPTIONS PARENTS ARE INVOLVED IN SUPPORT FY Program Budget: $.00 1st Qtr Expend: $.00 3rd Qtr Expend: $.00 PTE: .00 YTD Expenditures: $.00 2nd Qtr Expend: $.00 4th Qtr Expend: $.00 %Budget Spent: .00 % 35.1ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC Page Date 001470 Parent Invl:Tri-Dis Dir SAO Coord Recruit 1 57 4/29/92 000064 ASSC SUPT/ORGN. \u0026amp; LRNG EQUITY 3/12/96 3/27/96 ATTEND ALLIANCE MEETING ATTEND ALLIANCE MEETING 001472 Parent InvlxTri-Dis AssT Supts PRINCIPALS I 57 4/29/92 000073 VIPS/CASHION BUILDING 3/31/96 3/31/96 PTAS IN PLACE.PTA PRES.\u0026amp;VIPS CHAIRS ON FILE. CHANGE FORM COMPLETED. MOVE TO PRINCIPALS. Report Date: Page: Abbreviated Text 8/22/96 94 Utilize parents in marketing education Est. teacher/parent comm, for school activities 001474 Parent Invl:Tri-Dis 001503 Parent InvlsTri-Dis 001505 Parent InvljTri-Dis 001507 Parent InvlxTri-Dis 001536 Parent InvlsTri-Dis Dir SAO Assoc Supt Asst Supts Asst Supts Assoc Supt Coord Recruit Coord VIPS Principals Principals Coord VIPS 35.2 I I I I I 57 57 58 59 58 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 Parent recruitment teams to encourage families to Involve parents in learning prog, to utilize APPLE Offer workshops for parents/discipline/learning ai Parents/staff develop strategies for home learning Encourage the Chamber to continue existing programADDENDUM LRSD FY 96/ 3 Program Budget Document Report Date: Page: 8/22/96 95 Program Name: Program Code: Parental Involvement 33 Primary Leader: DIR SAO Secondary Leader Program Description: THE PURPOSE OF THE RECRUITMENT PROGRAM IS TO DEVISE A SYSTEM COUNTY ARE KNOWLEDGEABLE ABOUT ALL SCHOOL OPTIONS AND TO ENCOURAGE VOLUNTARY : COORD RECRUIT IN WHICH PARENTS THROUGHOUT PULASKI MOVEMENT WHICH AIDS DE- SEGREGATION. FOR THIS PROGRAM TO BE EFFECTIVE, OUTREACH INTO THE COMMUNITY MUST BE ENERGITIC AND INCLUDE THE SUPPORT OF EVERY FACET OF THE PULASKI COUNTY COMMUNITY. FY Program Budget: $34/000.00 1st Qtr Expend: $298.48 3rd Qtr Expend: $7/946.02 FTE: .00 YTD Expenditures: $.00 2nd Qtr Expend: $7/810.92 4th Qtr Expend: $17/944.58 %Budget Spent: 100.00 % 36.1ID ADDENDUM Program Name Primary Leader 001488 Parental Involvement DIR SAO 001502 Parental Involvement Assoc Supt 001506 Parental Involvement ASST SUPT 001508 Parental Involvement AssT SUPTS 001510 Parental Involvement Assoc 001511 Parental Involvement Assoc 001512 Parental Involvement Assoc 001513 Parental Involvement Assoc 001519 Parental Involvement Assoc 001520 Parental Involvement Assoc 001522 Parental Involvement Assoc 001523 Parental Involvement Assoc 001528 Parental Involvement Assoc 001533 Parental Involvement Assoc 001534 Parental Involvement Assoc 001535 Parental Involvement Assoc 001541 Parental Involvement Assoc 001542 Parental Involvement Assoc 001543 Parental Involvement Assoc 001544 Parental Involvement Assoc 001546 Parental Involvement Assoc Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt Supt 002300 Parental Involvement DIR SAO 005126 Parental Involvement Dir SAO LRSD PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT Secondary Leader COORD RECRUIT Coord VIPS PRINCIPALS PRINCIPALS Coord VIPS Coord VIPS Coord VIPS Coord VIPS DIR COM Coord VIPS Coord VIPS Coord VIPS Coord VIPS Coord VIPS Coord VIPS Coord VIPS Coord VIPS Coord VIPS Coord VIPS DIR PRE Coord VIPS Coord VIPS Coord Recruit 36.2 Legal Reference DOC DOC DOC MR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR LR CO Page Date 5 134 134 134 134 134 135 135 135 136 136 136 136 137 137 137 138 138 138 138 138 132 5 6/05/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4/29/92 4\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1629","title":"Court Filings concerning PCSSD's motion to modify desegregation plan with regard to class sizes, Joshua's motion for an interim award of attorneys' fees and costs for post-judgment monitoring, settlement agreement with the state, and LRSD 1995-96 fourth quarter status report and budget","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1996-08-12/1996-08-22"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Education--Arkansas","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Education and state","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Joshua Intervenors","Special districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Little Rock School District","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","School management and organization","School improvement programs","School integration","Lawyers","School enrollment"],"dcterms_title":["Court Filings concerning PCSSD's motion to modify desegregation plan with regard to class sizes, Joshua's motion for an interim award of attorneys' fees and costs for post-judgment monitoring, settlement agreement with the state, and LRSD 1995-96 fourth quarter status report and budget"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1629"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["125 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"District Court, Joshua intervenors' opposition to Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's) motion to modify desegregation plan with regard to class sizes; District Court, order; District Court, Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) motion for enlargement of time to present petition for attorneys' fees and costs; District Court, Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) supplemental response to Joshua's motion for an interim award of attorneys' fees and costs for post-judgment monitoring; District Court, motion to quash affidavits; District Court, Joshua intervenors' correction to motion of November 22, 1995; District Court, North Little Rock School District's (NLRSD's) supplemental response to Joshua's motion for an interim award of attorneys' fees; District Court, Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) motion for attorneys' fees and costs as to the state defendants; District Court, memorandum in support of the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) motion for attorneys' fees as to the state defendant; District Court, affidavit of M. Samuel Jones III; District Court, order; District Court, Knight, et al., response to Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) motion to modify desegregation plan respecting class sizes; District Court, brief in support of Knight, et al.,response to mostion of Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) to modify desegregation plan respecting class sizes; District Court, Knight, et al., response to Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) amendment and supplement to second motion to enforce settlement agreement with the state; District Court, brief is support of Knight, et al., intervenors response to Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) amendment and supplement to second motion to enforce settlement agreement with the state; District Court, motion for extension of time to file petition for attorneys' fees; District Court, notice of filing, Little Rock School District (LRSD) 1995-96 fourth quarter status report and program planning and budget document and addendum to 1995-96 third quarter status report and program planning and budget document  The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  AUG 1 ti. 1996 FILED U.S. D!STRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSAS AUG 121996 IN '3'HE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR'1it',icS W McCORMACK. CLERK Olflce of Desegregation Mormorni\"EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS By: ------;::;;:'r,,'~w WESTERN DIVISION DEP. CLERK LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF v. LR-C-82-Soo PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE W. KNIGHT. ET AL. ' '' RECEIVED DEFENDANTS !llJG 1 A 1996 INTERVENORS O,f. . INTERVENOR$ , ice of Desegregat,on Monitormn .f. ii JOSHUA INTERVENORS OPPOSITION TO PCSS\u0026~-Su MOTION TO MODIFY DESEGREGATION PLAN WITH RESPECT TO CLASS SIZES Come now the Joshua Intervenors and respectfully oppose the Pulaski County Special School District's motion to modify the desegregation plan regarding compensatory education classes. The reasons given by the school district for its position is that the plan requirement is too modest to yield any tangible results. The District has not demonstrated ~hat it has compiled with the agreement in the first place; and secondly the District is in contempt for de facto modification of the plan. The issue is presented because the teacher organization has filed a grievance regarding the matter and one way for the District to avoid an unfavorable result with respect to the grievance is to have the Court void it. The Joshua Intervenors respectfully oppose this motion and cite as authority the Settlement Agreement herein. Joshua also requests that the District provide a comprehensive report to the Court indicating to which it has complied with the plan provisions. The report should also include a class by class break down, the results achieved on a longitudinal basis, along with the amount of funds expended and/or saved by this effort since the institution of this particular settlement plan provision. Joshua also requests that the District provide a written business case demonstrating the \"sufficient information to indicate that the funds spent on reducing class sizes in compensatory schools by 5% can be better utilized in other areas.\" WHEREFORE, the Joshua Intervenors respectfully pray that the Court reject the Pulaski County Special School District's motion to modify the desegregation plan with respect to class size in compensatory education schools after a hearing which is hereby requested. Respectfully submitted, John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 (501) 374-3758 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I do hereby state that a copy of the foregoing pleading was forwar~~via United states mail to all counsel of record on this ( ~ day of August, 1996. F)Lxt~[if - AUG 1 4 1996 Office ot Desegregalion Monitoring IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT vs. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL SERVICEMASTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES, A Limited Partnership ORDER FiLr-D US 01s,h;:::T COURT EASTERN OISTf;. ICT ARKANSAS AUG 13 1996 JAMtSyV. M?CORMACK,CLERK By: II  s-::, 'hdw.f o DEP'eLERK PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS Before the Court are a number of motions for extensions of time upon which the Court now rules. The Little Rock School District's {LRSD) motion [doc.#2711) for an extension of time in which to respond to the Joshua Intervenors' (Joshua) motion for implementation of the recommendations of the Office of Desegregation Monitoring {ODM), is moot, the response having already been filed. .The Clerk is to remove this motion from the pending motions report. The motion (doc.#2726) of the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) for an extension of time in which to respond to the various school districts' motion to intervene is granted. response is due on or before August 19, 1996. The ADE's The LRSD's motion [doc.#2732) for an extension of time in - which to file a reply to Joshua's response to LRSD's motion to end 2750 federal court jurisdiction is granted. LRSD's reply is due on or before August 30, 1996. The motion of the parties [doc.#2736] for an extension of time in which to respond to the ADE' s motion to dismiss or, in i;he alternative, for abstention, and for an extension of time in which to respond to the various school districts' motion to intervene is granted. The parties' responses to these motions are due on or before August 23, 1996. 1 The Knight Intervenors' (Knight) motion [doc.#2741] for an extension of time in which to respond to PCSSD's motion to modify desegregation plan respecting class sizes, and Knight's motion [doc.#2749) for an extension of time in which to respond to amendment and supplement to second motion to enforce the settlement agreement with the state are both granted. Knight's responses to these motions are due on or before August 19, 1996. Also before the Court is the LRSD's motion (doc.#2712] to shorten Joshua's time to respond to discovery with respect to the hearing on Joshua's petition for attorney's fees. In the alternative LRSD asks that the hearing on Joshua's petition be continued from the scheduled hearing date of July 29, 1996. Because the hearing was in fact continued until August 19, 1996, the LRSD's motion is moot and need not be addressed. Accordingly, 1 The Court notes that the Pul:i,ki County Sp.:c1JI Sd1ool Dl\u003etncl (PCSSD) h~, J!r.:~Jy riled 11, response to both motions. -2- the Clerk is to remove this motion from the pending motions report. R IT IS SO ORDERED this~ day of August 1996. -3- IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION AUG 1 4 1996 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Office of Desegrega1,on Monitorins _.. PLAINTIFF v. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INT ERVEN ORS PCSSD MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO PRESENT PETITION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES \u0026 COSTS On July 31, 1996, the Court's memorandum and order granting the motion of the PCSSD with respect to the \"pooling\" issues was entered. Rule B-3 of the United States District Court Rules requires in many instances that the petition for attorneys' fee be filed within 14 days of entry of the order. Counsel for LRSD and the PCSSD have conferred and have agreed to ask that the Court defer the requirement of a petition and further defer any ruling on the issue of attorneys' fees until 30 days after entry of a final order on the pooling issue. Respectfully submitted: WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 200 West Capitol Avenue Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3699 (501) 371-0808 By ~ Q\u003c:::::C ~ M. Samuel Jones III76060) Attorneys for Pulaski County Sp~chool Di-strict 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On August /3, 1996, a copy of the foregoing was served by facsimile on each of the following: Mr. John W. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 2000 First Commercial Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Ms. Ann Brown ODM Heritage West Bldg., Ste. 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Richard W. Roachell Roachell and Street First Federal Plaza 410 W. Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Timothy Gauger Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 M. rUEh JonesIII ~ / ' 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL AUG 1 4 1996 PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS '/: 2 tJ I' #'VJ KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL Offi' ce Of D INTERVENORS esegregation Monitormg LRSD'S SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO JOSHUA' s MOTION FOR ArrTNTERI-M~ - AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS FOR POST-JUDGMENT MONITORING LRSD for its Supplemental Response to Joshua's Motion for an Interim Award of Attorneys' Fees and Cost for Post-Judgment - Monitoring states: 1. Attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference are the following exhibits: A. Affidavit of Dr. George C. Cannon; B. Affidavit of James L. (\"Skip;') Rutherford; and, C. Joshua Intervenors' Responses to LRSD's Interrogatories. 2. In their affidavits, Cannon and Rutherford confirm that Joshua's $2,000,000.00 fee paid by LRSD as a part of the 1989 Settlement Agreement included compensation for future post-judgment monitoring by Joshua during the life of the LRSD Desegregation Plan. See Exhibits A and B. 3. Attached to Joshua's Responses to LRSD's Interrogatories - are fee requests submitted by counsel for Joshua in other cases. See Exhibit c. Comparison of these fee requests with Joshua's fee request in the present case raises serious questions as to the accuracy and reliability of Joshua's \"reconstructed\" time records. 4. For example, on August 11, 1995, counsel for Joshua claims to have worked a total of 21 hours. In the present case, counsel claims to have worked 7. 5 hours in \"preparation for and hearing before Judge Wright re: budgets.\" See Activity Statement of John Walker, p. 87. In Davis v. Franks, U.S.D.C. No. 88-4082, counsel represented that he was in Hope, Arkansas on August 11, 1995, and spent 8.0 hours meeting with clients. Finally, counsel stated that on August 11, 1995, he spent 5.5 hours \"work[ing) on proposed findings of fact\" in Day v. Johnson, U.S.D.C. No. 94-849. See Exhibit C. WHEREFORE, LRSD prays that Joshua's Motion for an Interim Award of Attorneys' Fees for Post-Judgment Monitoring be denied. Respectfully Submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026 CLARK First Commercial Bldg., Suite 2000 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 ( 501) 376-2011 BY: 2 istopher Heller ( n c. Fendley, Jr. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the fo~lowing ~eop/q.Y deposi~y of sam/)jn the United States mail on this ~ay of --+f41---~~-cxs=----' 19--7,e--. Mr. John W. Walker JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Sam Jones Wright, Lindsey \u0026 Jennings 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES, P.A. 425 W. Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201-3472 Mr. Richard Roachell Mr. Travis Creed Roachell Law Firm First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown - HAND DELIVERED Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Timothy G. Gauger Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 h~istopher Heller John c. Fendley, Jr. 3 JOHN W. WALKER RALPH WASHINGTON MARK BURNETTE AUSTIN PORTER, JR. Mr. Chris Heller .. ,. JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. ATIORNEY AT LAW 1723 BROADWAY LITTLE ROCK. ARKANSAS 72206 TELEPHONE (501) 374-3758 FAX(501) 374-4187 Via Facsimile - 376-2147 August 15, 1996 Mr. John C. Fendley Friday Eldredge \u0026 Clark 2000 First Commercial Bldg. Little Rock, AR 72201 Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 2000 First Commercial Bldg. Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: LRSD v PCSSD Dear Chris and Clay: Enclosed please find a copy of the motion which I am filing with respect to the letter that I received from you regarding the hearing on Monday. Also enclosed are subpoenas for Dr. George Cannon and Mr. Skip Rutherford requesting their appearance at the hearing on Monday. JWW:js Sincerely, Dictated but not read John W. Walker cc: Honorable Susan Webber Wright Ms. Ann Brown All Counsel of Record Enclosures IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT_ COURT-~--, ... ,.,._,., . :::::., EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANS~ WESTERN DIVISION C=? c__::, 7 .'\u003c LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INT ERVEN ORS MOTION TO QUASH AFFIDAVITS Come now the Joshua Intervenors, by and through undersigned counsel, do hereby request that the Court quash the affidavits of Skip Rutherford and George Cannon. For its motion, Joshua states as follows: 1. The Little Rock School District's affidavits of Skip Rutherford and George Cannon are untimely. 2. The Joshua Intervenors are prejudiced by the late filing of the affidavits. Undersigned counsel has not received said affidavits as of this date and is not familiar with the contents thereof. 3. However, Joshua does not oppose the appearance of Skip Rutherford and George Cannon at the hearing on Monday in order that undersigned counsel may question them regarding said affidavits. Attached as Exhibits A and Bare subpoenas for witnesses Skip Rutherford and George Cannon which are served upon counsel for the Little Rock School District on this date for their appearance at the hearing on Monday, August, 19, 1996. WHEREFORE, the Joshua Intervenors respectfully request that - the Court quash the affidavits of Skip Rutherford and George Cannon or in the alternative require that they appear at the hearing for cross examination. Respectfully submitted, John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 (501)~ :?74-3758 J /1 By: {/AL JI tf\u003cUL1c-i___ Certificate of service I do hereby state that a copy of the foregoing was delivered facsimile to John C. Fendley and Chris Heller, Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark, 2000 First Commercial Bank Building, Little Rock, AR and by United States mail to all other counsel of record on this 15th day of August, 1996. - .... =AO= =88 =(R=ev= =119='1= S=ub=po=en=a =In =a C=lv=l C=a=se= ============- it h lb(.,f /l Issued by the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF-----------------  SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE Little Rock School Dist,V, Pul, County Special School Dist, 1 CASE NUMBER: LR-C-82-866 TO: Mr. Skip Rutherford [ii YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear in the United States District Court at the place. date. and time specified below to testify in the above case. PLACE OF TESTIMONY United States District Court United States Federal court Building 600 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 COURTROCM Judge Wright OA TE ANO TIME August 19, 1996 9:00 a.:n~ D YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear at the place. date. and time specified below to testify at the taking of a deposition in - e above case. A.CE OF OEPOSmON D YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents or objects at the place. date. and time specified below (list documents or objects): PL..A.CE D YOU ARE COMMANDED to permit inspection of the following premises at the date and time specified below. PREMISES Any organization not a party to this suit that is subpoenaed for the taking of a deposition shall designate one or more officers. directors, or managing agents, or other persons who consent to testify on its behalf, and may set forth, for each person designated. the matters on which the _person will testify. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 30(b) (6). - I John W. Walker, P.A., 1723 Broadway 1 Little Rock, AR 72206 (SM Aute 44, l'edII Aut11 of Clvfl ~ooedute. ~1111 C \u0026 0 OIi ,-_ .. , If action 11 pending In district other than dl1trlct of !nuance. 1t1t dl1tr1ct under c111 number. OATE August 15, 1996 --- .... - /(Kh/btl 6 - AO 88 IRev 1 /9\" ! Subeoena In a ClvQ Case - - Issued by the - - UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF - SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE Little Rock School Dist V . Pul, Co, Special School Dist, 1 CASE NUMBER: LR .. ~82-866 TO: Dr. George Cannon ~ YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear in the United States District Court at the place. date. and time specified below to testify in the above case. PLACE OF TESTIMONY COURTROOM United States District Court Judge Wright United States Federal Court Building 3rd Floor 600 West Capitol DATE ANO TME Little Rock, AR 72201 August 19, 1996 9:00 a.m. D YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear at the place, date. and time specified below to testify at the taking of a deposition in - above case. E OF DEPOSITION I OM' ANO \"'\"  YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce and permit inspection and copying of the following documents or objects at the place, date. and time specified below (list documents or objects): .. PLACE lo,ne=o,.,,  YOU ARE COMMANDED to permit inspection of the following premises at the date and time specified below. PREMISES ' I OMSANO '\"' Any organization not a party to this suit that is subpoenaed for the taking of a deposition shall designate one or more officers, directors. or managing agents, or other persons who consent to testify on its behalf. and may set forth, for each person designated, the matters on which the _person will testify. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 30(b) (6). fl;?S~~~ATTOA~Y ,OA ~ 0A OEFE~ANT) OATE . - - August 15, 1996 -- ,1$8\\JINQ ~!R'S NAM, AOOAl!aa ANO F'HONI NUMll!R John W. Walker, P,A., 172} Broadway, Little Rock, AR 72206 1 (SN Rule ,a. 11-t \"ult1 of Clvtl lllrooedute, llatll 9 l 0 1111 \"-If)  : !'l.t 1f action 11 pending In dl1trlct other than dl1trlct of I11uance. ltate dl1trlct under ca  e number. : ' JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. ATTORNEY AT LAW 1723 BROADWAY LITILE ROCK. ARKANSAS 72206 TELEPHONE (501) 374-3758 FAX (501) 374-4187 RECEIVE~ AUG 1 9 1996 JOHN W. WALKER RALPH WASHINGTON MARK BURNETTE AUSTIN PORTER. JR. Office of Desegregation Monitonn~ August 16, 1996 Honorable Susan Webber Wright United States District Judge United States Federal Court Building 600 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: LRSD v PCSSD Dear Judge Wright: In preparing for the hearing on Monday, August 19, 1996 regarding our fee petition, we determined that we had made several errors in calculation. This material is to correct those errors. You will find enclosed an amended Attachment One to our Motion of November 22, 1995, summarizing our entire claim. The following correction should be made in our Memorandum filed on November 22, 1995: at page 12 - the first full paragraph should read as follows: The Joshua Intervenors seek, for the substantive work on the case through October 28, 1995, an award for 2,016 hours of attorney time and 3,444.4 hours of paralegal time, as well as reimbursement of the amount actually paid to six persons who worked on the Joshua monitoring reports. See motion, Attachment One. This includes: [attorneys] John w. Walker, (1761.0 hours), Wiley Branton, Jr. (79.8 hrs), Austin Porter (175.2 hrs.); and paralegals Joy c. Springer (3079.1 hrs.) and Opal Sims (365.3 hrs.) Intervenors submission, viewed in the light of the record in this case, establishes that a claim is made for time \"reasonably expended on this litigation.\" at page 19 - in the first paragraph, the lodestar total for the work, other than for pursuing the fee award, should be for $740,375.81 for personnel and $17,636.00 for litigation costs. at page 20 - the request for work on the fee petition should be $35,075.00 for the work of four persons. -.... Affidavit of Joy c. Springer - (November 21, 1995) - at page 16, para. 20, the number of hours claimed for work on the fee petition should be 90 hours rather than 73 as indicated in her fee petition. We are seeing to it that opposing counsel receive this information ort Friday, August 16, 1996. Sincerely, Bob Pressman for John W. Walker BP:js cc: Ms. Ann Brown All Counsel Of Record Enclosure CORRECTED ATTACHMENT ONE TO JOSHUA FEE PETITON (August 16 1 1995) ,,_.,M.., -l ATTACHMENT1ONE SUMMARY OF AWARD SOUGHT A. Substantive Work On Case Number Individual Year(s) of Hours Rate Atty. John W. Walker 1990 6.85 $250.00 1991 562.4 same as above 1992 308.5 same as above 1993 329.2 same as above 1994 218.2 same as above 1995 335.85 same as above Sub-Total 1,761.00 $440,250.00 Atty. Wiley A. Branton, Jr 1990 1991 9.3 1395.00 1992 64.0 9600.00 1993 6.5 975.00 1994 1995 Sub-Total 79.8 $11,970.00 1 Atty. Mark Burnette [Time Waived] Atty. Austin Porter Jr. 1991-1995 175.2 $130.00 Sub-Total 175.2 $22,ns.oo Joy Charles Springer (Paralegal) 1990 27.5 $50.00 1991 849.0 same as above 1992 681 .9 same as above 1993 548.9 same as above 1994 505.0 same as above 1995 466.8 same as above Sub-Total 3,079.1 $153,955.00 Opal Sims (Paralegal) 1991 365.3 $40.00 Sub-Total 365.3 $14,612.00 2 Other Paralegal Costs: (Reimbursement of amounts paid for work on Joshua Monitoring Reports). Amount Individual Year(s) Paid Kirke Herman 1991 $16,675.00 1992 $8,400.00 1993 $12,732.00 1994 $4,587.00 Evelyn Jackson 1991 $2,700.00 Debbie Parker 1992 $26,225.81 LaRhonda Pondexter 1991 $5,218.00 1992 $6,875.00 Clementine Rouse 1991 $2,200.00 1992 $1,000.00 1993 $2,000.00 Delores Sykes 1992 $1,000.00 1993 $3,600.00 1994 $3,600.00 Sub-Total $96,812.81 Sub-Total Substantive IVork on Case (Personnel) $740,375.81 3 B. Work on this Motion Individual Number of Hours Rate Amount Atty. John W. Walker 37.0 $250.00 $ 9,250.00 Robert Pressman 120.0 $175.00 $21,000.00 Joy C. Springer 90.0 $ 50.00 $ 3,650.00 Austin Porter Jr. 2.5 $130.00 $ 325.00 Sub-Total 249.5 $35,075.00 C. Litigation Expenses Description Amount ~ Reimbursement provided to Joy C. Springer for mileage costs anc $ 4,742.00 other monitoring expenses; see J. Springer Aff., para. 21 Reimbursement to Kirke Herman for monitoring costs; see $ 100.00 J. Springer Aff., para. 21 Cost of copying docket in clerk's office; see J. Springer Aff., $ 60.00 para. 21 Witness fees for LASO budget Hearing and other costs; see $ 294.00 J.Springer Aff., para. 21 Copying and fax charges; see J. Springer Aff., para. 22 $ 9,250.00 4 Postage charges, see J. Springer Aff., para. 22 $ 3,190.00 Sub-Total 17,636.00 GRAND TOTAL $793,086.81 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF L' 1-; .l- \" -- - - I  ..J r I -. -;',( .. - . ' v -- vs. ...---NO. LR-C-82-866 -,.,..~ ,1 i.',_::,_ ,  --~ 1~ -cC,l_':_P RECEIVED'\"\" \"~ - PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. DEFENDANTS AUG l 9 1996 LORENE JOSHUA, et al. KATHERINE KNIGHT, et al. Office of Desegre9ation Mom1onr19 INTERVENORS INTERVENORS NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT'S SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO JOSHUA'S MOTION FOR AN INTERIM AWARD OF ATTORNEY'S FEES On or about August 9, 1996, the Joshua Intervenors filed a Supplemental Memorandum Regarding the Issue of an award of Attorney's Fees and Costs. Included in such document were brief excerpts from six (6) cases deemed relevant by Joshua, an affidavit of Joy Springer, a report on discipline; and an affidavit supporting Mr. Walker's request that any fee award in his favor be set at $250.00 per hour. As an initial matter, as set forth in Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 437 (1983), the United States Supreme Court held that the \"fee applicant bears the burden of establishing entitlement to an award and documenting the appropriate hours expended and hourly rates.\" NLRSD submits that, based upon both the Joshua Intervenor's failure to adequately identify those time entries which apply specifically to NLRSD, and the failure to keep contemporaneous time records, Joshua has failed to satisfy the standard set forth in Hensley and an interim award is inappropriate. The prejudice created by such lack of accurate, contemporaneous time records is evidenced in the Little Rock School District's Supplemental Response on this issue filed August 14, 1996. Such Response notes that on a particular day, August 11,  1995, counsel for Joshua claims, in three separate fee petitions, to have worked a total of 21 hours in two separate cities. Clearly, the significant period of time relevant to the fee petition, five years, renders Joshua's failure to maintain adequate records fatal to its petition as the attendant prejudice to the Districts is overwhelming. See Gates v. Gomez, 60 F.3d 525, 534-35 (9th Cir. 1995), holding that an \"applicant [for fees] should maintain billing time records in a manner that will enable a reviewing court to identify distinct claims. Individual Student Disciplinary Actions. Perhaps the most inappropriate basis for the recovery of attorneys fees from the NLRSD is Joshua's request for compensation for the representation of various African-American students in personal disciplinary disputes. Quite simply, neither the Plan nor relevant case law contemplates Joshua providing counsel, at the District's expense, for each African-American student who faces disciplinary action. The purpose of the Court's activities and the scope of its jurisdiction is to enforce the implementation of NLRSD 's Plan with respect to the class as a whole. Nothing in that Plan suggests black students may not be disciplined nor that each would be represented by counsel at District expense. Rather, the Plan describes a process that will be followed, and, unless it is alleged that this process is not being followed in a particular case, it is not related to the issue of Plan implementation and falls outside the scope of this Court's interest. We would note that the Court has already reached the same conclusion with respect to teacher disputes, and the sa\"m e reasoning applies here. Each disciplinary proceeding in unique and specific to the individual student. If Joshua contends that the NLRSD is failing to comply with the terms of the Plan as they relate to student discipline, the appropriate action is to file a motion stating such in this Court. Adopting Joshua's position would result in legal representation for all african american students at District expense for any event which occurs at or is related to school. Clearly, such eventuality is not contemplated by the provisions of the Plan or the relevant case law. Hourly Rate. The Supreme Court has clearly articulated that the goal of the reasonable fee provision \"to attract competent counsel, ... not produce windfalls to attorneys .. 886, 897, 104 s.ct. 1541 (1984). II Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. In the present matter, it is beyond dispute that an award of Two Hundred Dollars per hour is more than adequate to attract experienced counsel. It is apparent, based upon a review of the Fee Survey cited by Joshua, that an award of Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) per hour would not result in a \"relegation of the present matter to \"those lawyers with belowmarket billing.\" Casey v. City of Cabool, Mo., 12 F.3d 799 (8th Cir. 1993). In fact, the great majority of those polled in such survey reported top hourly fees of Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) - per hour or less. As the Supreme Court held in Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886, 895-96, 896 n. 11 (1984), \"the requested rates [ should be] in line with those prevailing in the community for similar services by lawyers of reasonably comparable skill, experience, and reputation.\" By: Respectfully Submitted, JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES, P.A. 3400 TCBY Tower 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 375-1122 41M CaAMf24/ Stephen w. Jones,1#78083 Allen Carney 0#94122 - - CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have this 16th day of August, 1996 served one copy of the foregoing via United States mail to the following: Christopher J. Heller, Esq. FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026 CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 M. Samuel Jones, Esquire WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 200 West Capitol Avenue 2200 Worthen Bank Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 John W. Walker, Esquire JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72206  Ann Brown OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING 201 East Markham, Suite 510 Heritage West Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Richard W. Roachell, Esq. ROACEELL AND STREETT First Federal Plaza 410 W. Capitol Avenue, Ste. 504 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Timothy G. Gauger Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, AR 72201 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. NO. LR-=-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. RECEIVf:.rl AUG 1 9 1996 Office of Desegrega:ion Moniicnng -  _...,._,. ___ ........ - - - -~ - --- - .. ._,,.,.. - PCSSD MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS AS TO THE STATE DEFENDANTS PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS The Pulaski County Special School District (\"PCSSD\") for its motion states: 1. The mandate of the Court of Appeals was returned to the clerk of this Court by letter dated July 18, 1996. The judgment of the Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court on two of the three issues presented on appeal. By previous order, the District Court had extended the time for the bringing of this fee petition until 30 days after return of the appellate court mandate. 2. The PCSSD, and others, are clearly the prevailing parties and are entitled to pursue an attorney's fee and an award of costs pursuant to Ark.- Code Ann. S 16-22-308 and 28 u.s.c.  19-20. 3. A memorandum detailing the law controlling this petition and the factors for the Court to consider in fashioning a fee and cost award is submitted with this motion. 4. Also attached to this motion as exhibit A is the affidavit of M. Samuel Jones, III detailing the time devoted to - these claims. WHEREFORE, the PCSSD prays for an award of reasonable attorney's fees and costs, all as provided by law. Respectfully submitted: WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 200 West Capitol Avenue Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3699 (501) 371-0808 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE on August /l , 1996, a copy of the foregoing was served by U.S. mail on the following. Mr. John w. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 2000 First Commercial Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Ms. Ann Brown ODM Heritage West Bldg., Ste. 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 2 Mr. Richard W. Roachell Roachell and Street First Federal Plaza 410 W. Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Timothy Gauger Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. NO. LR-C.:82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. Rec AUG 1 9 1996 PLAINTI~F DEFENDANTS INT ERVEN ORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. OfflceotD INTERVENORS - ...... _ - 8SeQre9aJJon Monitorm~ MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT O.F! .THE PCSSD MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AS- TO THE STATE DEFENDANT The PCSSD fully participated in these c "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1631","title":"Court Filings: District Court, Joshua intervenors' supplemental memorandum regarding the issue of an award of attorneys' fees and costs","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Walker, John W."],"dc_date":["1996-08-09"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Joshua Intervenors","Education--Arkansas","Education--Economic aspects","Educational law and legislation","Lawyers","Court records","Educational statistics","School management and organization","School discipline","Student assistance programs","School improvement programs","Education--Evaluation","School enrollment"],"dcterms_title":["Court Filings: District Court, Joshua intervenors' supplemental memorandum regarding the issue of an award of attorneys' fees and costs"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1631"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["57 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  Rece,,,En~~HN w. WALKER. P.A.  A'ITORNEY AT LAW AVG 1 2 1996 Office of Desegregation Monijorin9 1723 BROADWAY LITTLE ROCK. ARKANSAS 72206 TELEPHONE (501) 374-3758 FAX (501) 374-4187 JOHN W. WALKErr------ ---- ----- - RALPH WASHINGTON MARK BURNETTE AUSTIN PORTER, JR. August 9, 1996 The Honorable Susan Webber Wright Office of Oe~eg, cgation Monijorifl.n,, , , United States District Judge  . , ..._ _, United states Federal Courthouse 600 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: LRSD v PCSSD Dear Judge Wright: Enclosed please find our supplemental memorandum which supports our contention for compensation for work on behalf of particular class members relative to our motion for fees. Also enclosed are Attachments A, B, c, which address disparate discipline in the Little Rock and North Little Rock school districts. I have also asked Ms. Springer, of my office, to give a supplemental affidavit contrasting the ODM and Joshua monitoring reports with respect to the North Little Rock School District. Attachment Dis a copy of an affidavit that I submitted to the Court in my motion for fees in the Day-Hollowell case which supports my request for $250.00. Finally, we further remind the Court of our enclosure one which was attached to our opposition to LRSD's request for release of federal court jurisdiction which also supports our position for fees in this matter. JWW:js cc: All Counsel of Record Ms. Ann Brown REcec~\"-D - AUG 1 2 1996 f'ol,\\;,~ij;:.s.s _c.!LcdIJN 01s1r.1ci p.. Office Of Deseg IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I i\u003c' Q 9 i99o ragation M~RN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS P.,ul.l \\(  ........._________ WESTERN DIVISION cor-MP-C\\(, CLE.P,   M  , - JP-MES \\N_~:-~ .. ~ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. Bf ~rtrc:,-~- v. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA ET AL. KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INT ERVEN ORS Joshua Intervenors' Supplemental Memorandum Regarding the Issue of an Award of Attorneys' Fees and Costs Decisions Recognizing as Compensable Work on Behalf of a Class Member(s) As Well As Preparation of a Report on Monitoring (1.) Brewster v. Dukakis, 544 F.Supp. 1069, 1072 (D.Mass. 1982), aff'd as modified on other issues, 786 F.2d 16 (1st Cir. 1986) In describing the \"vigorous and necessary role in implementation\" played by plaintiffs' counsel, in a case involving the deinstitutionalization of persons with mental disabilities, the district court includes in part \"report[ing] and vigorously press[ing] charges of client abuse or neglect both in the community and in the hospital [and] represent[ing] clients during hearings on the drafting of individual service plans called for in the Decree .... \" The court of appeals quoted with approval the district court's having distinguished the roles of the \"court-appointed monitor\" and plaintiffs' counsel by noting counsel's responsibility for \"advocating on behalf of plaintiff class 1 responsibility for \"advocating on behalf of plaintiff class members.\" See 786 F.2d at 19 n.5. (2.) Eirhart v. Libbey-Owens-Ford co., 996 F.2d 846, 850-51 (7th Cir. 1993) In case involving sex discrimination in employment where the court had earlier approved a consent decree, the court ruled that compensable \"post-decree work\" included work on \"a dispute over whether a class member had shown 'good cause' under the terms of the decree to delay the starting date of her employment with Libbey.\") (3.) McDonald v. Armontrout, 860 F.2d 1456, 1461 (8th Cir. 1988) In a case involving conditions and practices on death row in a Missouri penetentiary, the court's description of appropriate monitoring activities by counsel included \"interviewing prisoners [and] investigating complaints .... \" (4.) Keith v. Volpe, 833 F.2d 850, 856-57 (9th Cir. 1987) In a case involving compliance with the Constitution and federal and state law in the construction of a freeway, the court of appeals quoted with approval a list of postjudgment activities identified by the district court as compensable, including the following: \"[i]Tenant relocation issue: assisting Advocate's office in resolving disputes between Advocate's Office and Caltrans regarding orderly removal of remaining corridor residents. [ii] Housing priorities for displacees: mediating disputes between the Advocate's Office and Caltrans to ensure the preservation of priority for displacees who are forced out prior 2 to availability of housing .... [iii] status Conferences: preparation of quarterly reports for court's Quarterly Conference on staus of project.\" In an opinion addressing fees for a subsequent period, the district court described the quarterly reports as follows: \"providing quarterly comprehensive reports to the court which summarize the progress made in implementing their decree and draw to the court's attention potential areas of difficulty; ... \" See Keith, 644 F.Supp. 1312, 1314 (C.D.Cal. 1986). (5.) Duran v. Carruthers, 885 F.2d 1492, 1496 (10th cir. 1989) In approving fees for postjudgment services, the court quoted with approval the district court's description of compensable activities by counsel in Brewster v. Dukakis. supra, - including activities on behalf of class members. (6.) Alexander v. Hill, 625 F.Supp. 567, 568, 569 (W.D.N.C. 185) In case involving compliance with federal time limits for processing Aid to Families with Dependent Children and Medicaid applications, the court identified as compensable time spent by counsel in \"review[ing] thousands of documents and hundreds of files in ten counties across the state as well as Medicaid files 3 at the Disability Determination Section in Raleigh.\" ohn w. Walker# 64046 John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 501-374-3758 Bob Pressman MA# 405900 22 Locust Avenue Lexington, MA 02173 617-862-1955 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I do hereby state that a copy of the foregoing supplemental memorandum was s~~~ via United States mail to all counsel of record on this ~day of Aug\"M//,~,.., v6\"ohnw. Walker \\... 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. v. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET. AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS SUPPLEMENTAL AFFIDAVIT OF JOY C. SPRINGER STATE OF ARKANSAS) SS) COUNTY OF ___ ) Comes now the affiant, Joy C. Springer, who after first being duly sworn, states as follows: 1. This affidavit supplements my affidavit dated November 21, 1995, in which I described work performed in this case totaling over 3100 hours. It is to give a contrast between the Office of Desegregation Monitoring and the Joshua Intervenors' monitoring reports with respect to the North Little Rock School District. 2. The Joshua reports for the years 1990-91, 1991-92 and 1992-93, which included the monitoring of the North Little Rock School District, differed from the reports of the Office of Des~gregation Monitoring in that the gathering of information for the Joshua reports included on-site visits to every school in the North Little Rock School District. The Joshua reports were 1 based, in part, upon information secured during these school - visits and interviews with the principals and other staff members. The Joshua reports also set forth anecdotal information from students, parents, and staff (a feature present in ODM reports to a lesser extent). Joshua's reports integrated statistical data from schools profiles. They further addressed more areas of operation of the NLRSD than the ODM has addressed in its reports concerning this district. Areas in the Joshua reports included curriculum, discipline, parental involvement, staffing, student enrollment by school and in particular programs, student participation in activities, and general areas of concern. The overall findings of the Joshua reports indicated that there was a substantial amount of noncompliance by each of the districts including North Little Rock regarding their - commitments to address achievement disparities, discipline disparities, integrated parental involvement, student assignments, integrated staffing, overrepresentation in special education, and underrepresentation in gifted and advanced placement classes. 3. I am familiar with the Office of Desegregation Monitoring and its charge to monitor the settlement agreement for the Pulaski County school districts. I also have some knowledge of the ODM's areas of concentration for their monitoring activities in previous years after having met with members of the ODM, staff on several occasions. Moreover, I have read the reports of the Office of Desegregation Monitoring that have been 2 distributed for last five years. - 4. Based upon my recollection, the Office of Desegregation Monitoring has produced written reports relating to five specific areas of .the North Little Rock School District over the last five years. These areas are racial balance, alternative schools, student participation in two of the many extracurricular activities, achievement disparity and buildings. 5. The ODM's first written published report on the North Little Rock School District was dated December 18, 1992. It was entitled 111991-92 Monitoring Report on the Alternative Schools: LRSD, NLRSD and PCCSD.\" The second written published report was dated February 26, 1993. This report was entitled \"NLRHS-West Campus 1992-93 Spirit Team Recruitment and Selection Process.\" It was completed, in part, as a result of a motion for - preliminary injunction by the Joshua Intervenors regarding the selection of cheerleaders and spirit team members at North Little Rock West campus. There have been at least two written published reports on Racial Balance dated January 12, 1994 and January 31, 1995. The next written published report was entitled \"Status Report on Achievement Disparity: LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD.\" The last written published report regarding North Little Rock was recently released on July 31, 1996 and was entitled \"Report on Elementary School Facilities in the North Little Rock School District.\" 6. This is not to say that the Office of Desegregation Monitoring has not been monitoring this District in other areas 3 since the settlement agreement simply because there is no written - report. Joshua has not completed a written monitoring report since its report of June 27, 1993, however, they have continued to monitor compliance with the settlement agreement in all three districts including North Little Rock . 7. I believe that there has been value to our monitoring every school in the three school districts. For at least two years straight, we visited every school in the North Little Rock School. I further believe that our frequent visits to these schools conveyed a sense that we would be vigilant about determining compliance with the agreements. Our visits also identified activities needed to improve compliance, not only in the North Little Rock School District, but in Little Rock and Pulaski County as well. We received feedback from principals and - staff regarding our findings in all three districts. I have read the foregoing affidavit and it is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and information. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this __9 _d ay of August, 1996. Notary Public 1 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 9-/7-~~3 4 NORTH LITTLE ROCK PUBLIC SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES October 13, 1995 Ms. Joy Springer Mr. John W. Walker 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Dear Ms. Springer: 2700 POPLAR Enclosed is a report of our disciplinary referral summary by action taken. The report is a cumulative record as of June 9, 1995 for the 1994-95 school year. - Suspensions are listed in the following areas: 09 Student Assignment Class (SAC) 10 Home Suspension 11 Boys/Girls Club Suspension ~z1o ~ff.1Iiff c~ Director of Student Affairs P.O. BOX 687, NORTH LITTLE ROCK, AR 72115/0687 501/771-8000 B . ., .  Ref : , DI!JOl~ Fii .E YEAft : NLRBl\u003e9S CUML'l /\\TIVE 01~ NORTH 1.ITTLE ROCK HIGH EICHOOl. - i l/i2 R- f\u003cEFERR/\\LB - ---- - -- - - - TOTl'IL- - - - ----   - -  --.. EcLt\\CK -- -- ... - - -tc  -- --NON--llLhCI\u003c -- -  - - \" CODI:: 081.:RIPTION B...._o, lHIL ar UDE:NTQ 'Hll'Al-:c---LE- - Fl'~Al .. 6 .. l 'JlAl----HAl--.li- - - H:;.H..i . \u0026;..,:J'QT-.i.L.- - -lo--~iC .. --- - - - Ot Cun~rnc wl th Studn't R 201 181 20\" 143 130 i ~ tc ~ a ~ i 7 ~ B i~3 13~ i9  i06 94 l 2 \" 47 41 6 ~ 02 Cnnf'rance w I -th Pareni'  R - - -- -fi5------l2---f - -- -- --i:O-- -- - -- 'i\u003e --- t.- -  -- a - -----;J-----Q--------------- ------- B st to s  e 7 1\" 3 3 o K 03 Confrnc with Btudnt nd P r nt R 9 6 3 M 7 ~ 3 K 2 ~ 0  a a s 3  7 4 3  t s o  0-4  Fl   - .. 0 ---------- O  -- ~  --  -  -- - -- - - ---- - 0 - -- ---- 0-*--- -- 0 - -- --- -- 0 --~-- ------ - - - ---- - ------- 8 0 0 0 N O O O  0 0 0 015 R O O O w O O O  0 0 0 \" B O O O w O o o  0 0 0  --oe-O-tW'nt ton Hall ------ - - --- -  -  - - - - - R - ---l9? t 76--2f--l2\u0026----l ? ---- --...;,:;i . ___ _,r.-4 ___ _.._ ___ __________ _ 8 l~l 122 19  04 7 2 12   ~7 LO 7 ~ 07 8tudnt WI ll H~ Up Tim R O O o w O o O  0 0 o ~ B O O O w O o o  O O O  ---- 8tudnt Placwd c,n -P.-obat Ion --- -- - -- R ----45--- -- i!l-4----tcf- ----~---;;,,!,- - ---=.,..-. -- 4.:.! - - ---4o- ---4__..._ _____________ _ B 3B 28 10  ~7 20 7 * ii 9 3  09 R 203 2i8 6~ w 219 164 5 5  64 ~4 lO  B 172 123  9  129 07 42  43 ~6 7  ~ - -H.-- 1tuw .. wnw I cm---- - - - - - ---  --------i!I,;;. 29 2 N 22---- I ! i--- - - - ------s----- --\"\"----+--1---------------- , 13 2e 26 2 .. 20 t '.? 1 .. a 7 1 .. R 45 43 ~  43 4 1 2 - 2 2 0\" 8 25 23 2 M 23 2t 2 N 2 2 0  li flc:,y/Glrl Club Susp:nlan ---- - -- . ....... -----;----ft--0-- - ----- - ------ - -0-  - ---- 0 - - - -'--\u003ci,_ _ _ .... ,_ ________________ _ Bue au ... nlan lt--'t\"'r-ea~urdy ttct,aol--------- us Rco111 .. nded Expulwlan --;.-- - Ottnor -- ------ l7 11,.11llan a o o o .. o o o  o R 20 i9 i w i2 il 1  B 0 8 B 18 17 t  12 S\\ l\" 6 6 0 .. 0 .. 0 .. R 29-4 20!5 89  S.69 lt.i-!---1!Fl '---f,li!t!!l!5;.---~9'i'~-.;.---;,hi!--~------------- B 209 i36 73  1 2 0 ~i. -49  1~9 R 4 4 0 w  4 0 N 0 a 4 4 o \" 4 4 o  o o:S (\u003e 0 0 ., ---- - --- ---R---26--- 2l---6 ----  iii! a:'i~ --   -- ----- -2 - -----------i---------------- 0 24 19 ~  22 1~ 4  2 i l w A 4 4 0 w  4 0 N O O O tt 8 4 4 0 N 4 4 0 N O O O N - -   - - --- -- - ------------'l\"'O-- Rfi'.FERR,l,t;a-------'l'-,--- -95l-- - Q--\u0026f.15-----.....,.- - i....,_. _ .. - -~\\'!.,..__-.;,.. ,.. .::. .__ _. .,_..----------------- TOTAL STUDENTS---- 83~ 6~2 183 tt Si,6 ' 432 i ~ 'I \" ;;,9 ~~-o .. ,9 ... ---  - . . ------ -------------- ----------- - ---- - - -------- - - ----- - ---- -- -- --- -- ---------------------------- tt----- -- -- - -- - ----- ------------ - - - - - - ----------- - ------ - -------------- - --  ,, \"' ----------------------- ---- --------------- ------------------------------------------------ . ------ -- - ------ -- - ---------- - ---- - --- ----------- ---------------------------- - - - - ----------- ------- - -- ---- ---- ---- - - --------------- --- - -- -- -- ---------------------- - --- - - - -------------- ----  - ----........ -- --- ...,1----- ---- - ------------- --- ------------------------- - -------- - - --------- ------------ --------------  Ref, , DIU01 .5. F II. E r'EAF~ , NL.l~BlY~ CLIHUI..ATIVE 013 NORl.H l . ITlLE ROCK Hl~H 6CHOOL  \u003c\u003e9/10 F\u003c   REFl'RR/\\Lfl COl\u003ett hl!:8Cft I F-r I UN 8-... Cl UAt . f'I I UDl;.HTfJ 0l with Gtudnt 02 0:1 Con1'rnc wl th Studer,t and Pa, en1: 0-4 oa Detwntlr,n Hall 07 Student Will Hak Up 11~ oe  8tudnt Placed on  0Prohe  lan 09 Studnt \"'--nt ClaaaC\u0026IIIC\u003e 1--to - - - eu.,....,., \". ll B\u003ev  /Clr l Club Suepanlon R 97 63 34  66  6 2 0,. 31 9 86 ~5 31 tt ~9 40 J ,, N ',,,l.7 17 i. -4 .. l2 \" R - S\"' --- 10 --   .. .. -  ~2-----9---- -i'l---- 2 --- --i ~ ---if------- - ----- ----- 13 14 so 'I ,. 12 9 :J,. 2 1 i \" R  9 3B 11 ,. ~!5 ~6 9  \\  I ~ 2  B 44 34 10  31 23 a 13 11 2  R i'i. 14   -'?   ~.5 - - - --+-   \u003c!r- .., -----6- - --- S----l--------- - - -- ----------- - - -- 8 ~1 14 7 N ~~ 9 6 - 6 ~ i N R 64  7 17  47 39 12  17 12 l5  a 5a  s 1 7   i ~,;, 12  17 ~ l5  -Fe  .. 1.096-- .. ---13.5 3!ii'I - *   - ? ;\u003e-~ ----9\u0026---- ~------~--~ ~,._-______________ _ U ~92 31~ 180  339 203 136  J~3 109 ~~\" R 6 3 3  4 1 3  2 2 O \" B 6 3 3   ~ 3  2 2 0  A -- f'\u003eB  ,,, -  115  - . .. . ii() - - - - - -H--  --9--:;us-----9 .. ----4..-.. _ a ~- 39 1~  30 21 ,  2  1a R 669   7\"' 19~ tt tsO   I 3  11 lf;6 w 1-!.!5 ! l:;\u003e6 e 3~~ 232 li2  ~~7 \\ 1~? ea w ?7 7 3  - .... - - A -- -i4H - - -  87 --   -- f. - - -----  -----\u0026fl---+----.4-a------.'\"-,._ _ -;--.-- ------- ------ a 7:S 62 S.3  47 3 1 i O  2 8 ! 2!5 R 79 ~~ 24  67 ~lJ t9 ~ 12 ' 7 8 64. 4~ 22 N ~3 :56 17  11-~ 6 ::s \"  - --- - ----- A - -0 ---- -- \u003c\u003e --- - ----- ----- - ~\u003e- - --- - O-----O- --- -Q- ---\u003c\u003e_.~ - - - ----------- B O O O  0 U O  0 l:I 8uw Buepnalan R 13 11 2  10 9 1  3 B 12 iO 2 * 9 13 1 ~ 3 0 2 2 0 .. i .. i .. 1--,....---,alt  ~rd..., -tk:hoa l ----------     - - - -- -~- -- !5tcd - --- i5  '1-- --6,..__..._07 26!0 f.--2-- -~'6------'i~--..+.--------------- B 297 i9f l06  226 137 09\" 71 !;4 17  Ui R 2 2 0  2 ~ O  O O O M Q 2 2 0 M 2 ~ () - 0 0 0 M --;.-ath.r -- ----  - - - --- ---- --- -   - - - - - ---fl -  20'- --ti39 - --65   -  ib7- ----i0=! ----6-- 7 ;,.,_ _ ... ,...-_.. ______________ _ B 1153 100 153 tt 11.3 70 \u003c11 :s  ... 0 :JO 10 \" 17 EPullon R :J 2 1  2 .l I.  i .1 0 \"' B 3 2 1 N 2 1 l M l l O M t---  - - -  ---- -  - - ----T0TM;- ftt!:Fe:~--t:t---~'1'6---2066  --9f 1  -tt - 220-4 --1\\-- 'IA- --- '?5'6---lli! --- fSfl~.+.l-=s----- ------------ T01.AL STIIDENTel-- 17:,::s t.i-4? :\"17l, * 12:,10 7e1 ::.  'l:':i \" 4'1!5 3l,... 1., 1  - ----  -   - - - ----  ---- ----.. - - --... - - -- - - .. ... . .. ... - .... ----- --- - -- -- - - - - ------ - --- ------- --------------- 1------ - - - - - - ---- - ----------- - ------- ---- ----- - -- ---------  -- - - ---- - --- ---- - ------------------------- - - -- ----------- --- . - ..... -- - - - --------  . _ ,, -- -- --  - - ---- - -- ---------- .... ---- ------ - . .. - ---- - .. -- -   . - -- - - - ---- ---- -- ---- --- - ------ ---------- --------------- ------  - -- -- - - - - ---------- -- --- - ----------- - --- ----- - ----- --- - - --- - - - ---- - -------- ------ .. ---------------------- It----- --   --. -    - -- --- ---- ---  - ------ ---- ------  -\"-- -  -----  ----\"- - - - - - - - ---------- .. - . ---- --------  Rt : j OJHOj .J. FJI i;_ ,E. Af~ , \u003c811'15 CllHUL,,TIVE 020 ,,._ l\"l,RNATIVE CENTER - i::l.1:HE,~TA \u003c l' R-  REF HRF\u003cALB   - -- l oTAL--     - N      --  Etl.r.CI\u003c --  -  - --  - -NON EtL-.CI\u003c -- --\" COl\u003eE IIESC\"I,.TIUN e~AC;\"I UAI. STUDENTe TOTril. HfllL e - FE_H ... l.E*\"f O'f\"';---+fN-:E--f-r.H,t,LE\u003c\u003effH-.a.L Hi1lLE - -F:H,i,l:E=-- - - - ------------- 01 C1.,11 frnc with Ytudnt r~ o o 0 M O O O M O 0 6 .. a o o \" 02 C1.,n'frnc  WI th Prn1\" -  - - o  -- - -o - 0 M O ( ) 0 M O O ? M --o-,. - -\u0026- ---- 0---- - -0 ------~----e-1,..~-------------- B O 0 \u003c\u003e N O O OM O O O 4 03 Ct\u003enfrnc with l3tudent Htid Prnt R \u003c\u003e o () M O i) 0 M O O ()  t a o o 0 N O I) \\) H O {\u003e 0 .. o .. F-r lvl lv Denied  - R O  0   O  ,.  O --- --- -.:) ----  \u0026 --   0 ---------\u003e----- - ------------- a o o \u003c\u003e M O D O  0 0 0  OS Bhavlar Contract R 0 o 0 M O O \u003c\u003e M O O O \" 13 0 0 0 M O O O  0 0 0  - \"()6 - l)tntlon Hall  - -  R -    O -  O -- \u003c\u003e . ..   0-----~-----0----  0-----.... ---~----------------- ~) 0 0 0 N O () () M O () 0 M 07 8tudnt Will Hk Up 11~ R O 0 0  0 \u003c\u003e O  0 0 0  a o o (). 0 () 0 N O O Off 09 9tudnt Plcd on  ,...,.obatlon R   \u003c\u003e -  o - 0 ... - 0 --  - --0------0----.-   0- -- --0----0-------------------- B O 0 ()  0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 M 09 81udn't Alvn,...ni Cl\u003cBAC) R O 0 0 * 0 U O ,. 0 0 0  B o O \u003c\u003e  0 o O ,. 0 0 0  ~O-- 8uwpnlon--- -   --  --  ----- --- R - - le--  -\u003c   -   --- ... - - ~ - - - --.\u003e- --------- . 0 ---~----\u003ci------------------ B 1 0 1  1 0 l M O O 0 ll 8'\u003eys/Clrl Club l:luspnslon R O 0 0 M O O O N O O O tt 8 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 \" 0 0 0 N -t~ --1'lt School Sup  IC-6, R -   O  -o 0 * 0 ---- - --- -- - 0-  0 ------ - -0 ------- -....--0-----0--.----------------- B O \u003c\u003e 0 M O O O M O O O \" 13 811  auspenelon R o O \u003c\u003e w o n o  o o o B O 0 \u003c\u003e  o n o  o o o .. 1--1~--1_11.,tvrday Br.hoot ---   - --- - - -- - --- - - - - O -- -- -- O -\u003c -  - --  -\u0026 - - ------~- - - - - ~...------o - ---.-. ----------------------- a o o (1 M O O O ,. 0 0 0  lS Rac....,_ndd EPullon R O O 0 M O O O M O O O ff B O O () M 0 0 () M 0 0 0 tt -;-  Oth...-   - ---- -  ----- -- R - -   0 -- O - - -  0 - ...  \u003c\u003e-   - -- - ,\u003e---- -- 0 - - - --0 - ----~---~---------------- B o O 0 w O D O  0 0 0 ff 17 11!:pulslone R O 0 0 0 0 0 N O U O  0 0 0 \" 0 .. 0 0 6 .. 0 0 0 .. ------- TO\"I\",._._. ~f'-ll!:RR1'l:-- --- - - -t------- O - - 1 -tt --- ---------0 l 11 --- \u003c\u003e- ----\u003e---....._._ _______________ _ TOTAL BTUDENTB---- 1 O 1 M l O 1  0 0 0 .. I----- - - . - - -- . - - ------------- - . ---------- - ----- -- ----- - --- - ----- -------- --- ---------------------------- ,___ - - -- --- -  - -- ---- -- -------- - - --- ---------- - - . ----  - - . - -  -  .... -- - --- . -------- - --------- --- - - --------------- --- . - -- - ---------- ------ . -- ------------- ------- - -- -- -- . ----- --- - ---- - -- ---- -------------- -- - - - . -- --------- ------ ------ -- -- - '  - -- . - -- -  -----------------  ----------- ------- --- -.  ---- .. - ----- .... .. - --- -- -- --- - - - ----- --------- - - - __, _ .  - - - --- ----- - -- ------- ----- --- -- - - - --- --- -- -- - - - - Rw1 : OIHOS JSL DI ,.c Ip l In., y t\u003cwf.,.el fl umot y FJlE YEAR : NLRS095 Act lon rlcen CUHULATIVE 021 ALTCRNATIVE CEN.fEF\u003c BECONl\u003eAF\u003cY R- REFfcRRALS  --TOl AL.--- -----   -------- EoLACI\u003c - - - - - -- ----- --NON-ltLACI\u003c  - - ----,. COi'\u003e DESCRl~TION 8MAc,uAL t!ITUDt!.HT1S Tl]TAl_ - H ... Lt! l'E.HM:E..-'1-0TAL----HM..::E r1: 11. ..L Eto'FeTT'\"'\"'\"1L.c:---il~\"\"ML.::iEE..---FF.'tiEl::tt1.\" \".'=.L ::iEF---....- -------------- 0t 02 03 oa Cun'frnc wl th Stu.dnt Con'feruc Mith Utuden t nd P r nt ~rlvllev Denied R 5 a  3 2  3 3 2 l. l \" l 0 l .. .. l 0 i - -- R --- --~- --- -  1-- - - - - - ~ - ----1-----e..-..----\u0026-----~-----e ........ ---------------- 8 t s o t 1 0 .. 0 0 0 R t3 t2 1  9 0 ..  3 t .. e 1t 10 s ,. a 0  3 2 i .,  --- R  -- - 1 ---  t - -- ---O- - - - ----\u003e-- --,-.,,._--+---- --+-----e,-,,._--------------- B l l O ,. 0 R O o O ,. 0 S O O O N 0 0 0 () 0  0 .. 0 .. l 1. 0 . 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 .. --o - 1\u003etwntlon Hatt - -- ---- -------- ~ 07 cw it 115 l7 Studnt Will Hk Up Tlfflw t!J'tudwn1' r-tc:d an ,-raba  ton - u  pwnwt01-r------ Boy  /Glrle Club Bu Pnlon -l~\u0026chaal-a~fjlCf-,~llo+t--- - Bue Bu  Pnlon -1t~day ttchool---------- --  11,alelon B l l O ,. R o o o  B O O o ,. i 0 0 l () () 0 .. 0 .. 0 .. 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 ..   - ----- R  t ---- ----0 -----+----+---e-.----\u0026-----~---.Q..---------------- B t l O ,. 0 .. 0 0 0 R 63  6 t7 tt 16 .. 6 !5 l .. B 46 32 t4,. 13  6 s i .. ----- - R 415 a~--f.------'---- -\u003e--~\u003c+--\u003e---''-------''----------------------- B :It 24 7  7 .. 3 3 0 .. R 6 5 S tt l. .. l l 0 .. a 6 ~ s ,. .. s. .. t l 0 .. - ------ -A----\u0026---- ~ - -----\u003c~-----Q--- ---0----~:\u003e------0----.Q..----------------- s 0 0 O ,. R 3 3 o tt B 3 3 o  0 2 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 .. .. 0 t \" i 0 0 .. l 0 .. l 0 .. --------iRFt---t a---- -ta- ~-----H\u003e----+\u003ci\u003e----\u003co\u003e-.--- -31-----;a----\u003c-\u003e------------------ s 10 to o  a a 0  2 2 0 .. R   o  2 2 0  2 2 0 .. B   O  2 ~ 0 .. 2 2 0 .. - - - ---A-------- - - t ------c.  - - - -,--- --~ - --~ ... B l l Ott i l 0 .. 0 0 0 .. R e  t   3 1. .. i i 0 .. B 8  l  4 3 l  l l. 0 .. - - ---- --,-OT-.t- REFERftH::------wo-----~- -3-- - a4---!-.ta~\u003c!...---.~!W9 \u003e-4o\u003e---2-~- ---?-4.----.!li-o\"-------------- TOT ... L STUDENTS-- - - t2S 99 26  to  81 ::' :~ .. ::? i 19 3 .. --------- - - - ------- -- -- - ---- - --- - -- - - --- .. - ----- - - - --- --- ---- -- - -------- --- --- --- - ---- ,.... ________ . . - - -- - - -------- . -- --- ---- - -- - -------- ---- ---- . ------------ --- ----- - - --- --- -------- - - --- - . -- - - -- - - ----- ----- -- .. ------- - - - - ----  -------------------------------------- ----- - -------------- - ------ - - - R , , 01aot ~ FJI.E tEAn , ~Bb9S DI \"'c Ip l I nrv r-.cef.A l aununrv Et ,.. Act on--n CUHIJI \"TJVE 024 HIDGEf\u003cUAD HIDDLE GCHC.JOL R REFfi RRAL!3 -  - -  - -  rOTAL------ ----- - - r.L.ACI\u003c --- --- - -N -- --NONBLACI\u003c -  conE DF.BCAJ~TJON S-ACIU,..l, 9TUDP.:NT13 TOTAi, H/IILE FF.HAI Ettl\"OT~-tt11ot::E FCtl,.,I .. E..-'fG'f-M;---t-tM::E --~-t?H#'.t:l~-------------- Ol C,\u003enfrenc \"'I 'th Student R 1J\\ 48 36 M ~,9 :41 :.?l3 tt :.?S I 7 0 \" 8 64 30 34  4S 19 26 N 1.? fl 8  02 - ft'  -.- !, - -  -- 22 - - - 72 --- - !~?-------f\"\"l - - --,-a-.--- i.0------+1----e---------------- a ~IJ 19 iY tt ~~ 1~ 12 tt ~~ 7 7 ~ o::s R 17 9 a Ll \"' 7\" 6 ~ 1.  G 17 9 a tt ll 4 7  6 ~ l \" 04 I'\u003c l O :I   -t - t\"~ - - ---t----- -O------O------e----------------- S l o 1  l o 1  o o o  OS R 1 0 l  l O i  0 0 0  B 1 O IN l O 1N O O Ow :  !f~ 1.1; ---~:-: -- t~------~1- - - -;~-: --~:---....;,:;,w_3'l----tl-t63-.,.. ,_ _____________ 07 Eltudent WI ll Hake Up Tl11te R 2 2 O  2 ~ O  0 O O  B 2 ~ (}  2 2 0  0 0 0  -oa - etudent ~lcd un l\"\"rablan R  - -   0- -  0 ---0 ....... --$--- -  (  - ------- 4;9._----88---------------------- B O O O w O o O N O O O  09 R 436 2::13 183 tt :ns'I' 1.31 l~B \" 177 S22 !~S \" B 21B 126 B~  130 73 ~7 M 0::1 ~3 32  ------  --- A - -- Ul1   - 1.06- --?~---- :l-33 -----7.,;\u003e---\u003c\"rt--.... 1381------ac, _-+_,_ _____________ _ B 10? 60 4? N 79 4L 30 w 30 19 Ii ll R 3~ 26 \"/  22 IH 4 N 11 a 3  9 30 23 \"1 N 20 j6 4 N iO 7 ~\" ~-.-t 8choot  8u--it(-t  - - - - --     ---   - - - R - - -   O O -- -  0 . ... ____ ______ ___ ~\u003e - -----0- -- ----Q-\"---'--v----v-,_ _____________ _ B O O O  0 0 0  0 0 0 \" t3 8u S\u0026\u0026Pnlan R 11 7 4  lO 7 3  l O l\" ~.--.-~urday echa~n-1.1--------- . _____- -=--t~~---S:--6:-:__a:_ ___ 3 ~---\",3_'-\u003c,.__ _ .,.a1----i~oe----P.i1.-.\". -------------- 8 106 '50 eit..  68 30 3B \" ~18 ;.\u003eO i 8 us Rcaa11tndd Expulsion R o O o  0 o O \" 0 0 0  S O O O  0 0 0 w O O O  --- - - ~ - ---tU- - - Si   ----El~    66 ---iilf.l  -- S-8-- H5----t-3-------\u003c--------------- S ~... 30 2~ .. 42 ::a\u003c, :?2  1.2 10 2 .. 17 Expulsions R i i O i 1 \u003c\u003e 0 0 ON B l 1 0  i 1 O  0 0 0  - --- - -- -- -------- - TOT.-.t- ftef't!:ftftH.;\u0026------1.-1. r?----685-- --49~- ---,''!f-9-----41 a --- 36-t:------398 267 TOT\"'L STUDENTS----- 7615 42\\5 ::S40 \" 15J 1 ' 270 241. \" 2~\u003c'1 1t,:5 i~------------------ '19 .. f--- - --- -  -------- --- - - ------- - - -- -  -------------- ------ -- -------- -- ---- - -------------------------------------- - -  ---- - --- ---- ------- ------- .. ------------- ----   .. ------------- a-----  --- - --- -------- - - ---  ------ --   - - - ---- ---- -  - -   - --- -- - --- -- - --------  -  -- -------------- -t------ -- ------------------------------ ------ - .. - -- -------------------------- . . --  .. --------- --- - -------- - -------- -    - . . - - - ----- --- ------------ ------- -------- ---- --- - --------- - - - - - - --- -- - ----- - Rf , D180S .58L Fll.E YEAR I NU~8D9:5 CUHULATIVE 02!3 I. AKEWODD HIDDLE\" SCHOi.iL -,1'09/9:S R- REFE,RRALB -  ---- --- TOTAL--- ---- -  - ----- -BLACl\u003c ----- - - --- -----NON- \u0026LACK- --- __ ,. CODE DESCRIPTION  \u0026ACTUAi:- STUD\"NTIS TMTl\\l~---HM:t!'\" ---- ~!:Hlllt:1! .. TOTnt;;---=:e--f\"eHnt:eto-'f'O'l''l'~,._,tL=--tl1ilAAtL:tE~---11f'-'f!E~l111,,,,,t:L:tE::-\"...------ ---------- 01 02 03 0:5 C~nfrnc Nlth Btudnt --oa- Detent Ian tta t t 07 --oe 09 ll Poys/C.lrls Club 8usplitnlon R 53 33 20  ::S9 2 :5 l .6  l\"' 10 .. .. a  6 29 17.. 3\"' 2t 13\" 12 ---- -- ft ---:s 2 ---t  . 2 e ~ .. :t B 3 2 l  l O 1  2 2 0 .. Parent R 2  B 6  1.0 5 ~ -  .J 1 a 1  a 6  ,o ~ 5\"  3 l \" .. - - ---  - --- ft -  - \"1.--- ---0 - - - t -- - ----1,------ -\u003c, -\u0026-._--- ----- ---,,._.---------------- 8 l O 1 M l O l  0 0 0 .. R 6 2   :5 1 4  i 1 0 .. B 6 2 4  :5 l 4  l l 0 .. -   '  -- -  - -- ft- - -T:?-----\"41!, .. -\"21!,(t -~.,\"1\u003e---~22'17'!~.,_-~2~(71'6-\"ilNt----5!2\".J-~0,-----1;~t---,M!.....,,._.-------------- 8 29:S l68 12~  11-11 ;\u003e1~ 93 ,. l 1.2 70 -42 M R 2 1 1  2 1 l  0 0 0 .. a 2 1 1 ,. 2 1 1 ,. o R -  - - 1.:t--- --  9  - .... -  -- 't.- ~ ----.+-.....-- -=.\u003c\u003e-- ----------0-- ------------- 8 13 9   ll ? 4 2 ~ 0 .. 2 0 .. R 187 138 49  144 97  7  43 .. , 2 .. e 110 e5 33,. 07 56 31.. 31 29 2 .. .. --- --- -- -ft--26----- -i: -- --------- l5 _____ __,-,-------------------------- s 19 l  5  12 a 4  7 6 S: .. R 29 15 l  M ~2 0 14 N 7 7 0 .. B 19 ll B  13 5 ~  6 \"' 0 .. l---t:::t--tt- -t1chaat-a-c1\u003c-a-,---- ------ --- - - - ------ R- ---~ --------o ---- e -- - ----0-------,~ \u0026-- ----e----\u0026------------------- e O O O  0 0 0  0 0 0 .. R 27 17 lO  23 14 9 w 4 :1 l e 27 17 10,. 23 14 9  - \"' --------ta, da .,- 8chau 1- --------- -- - ------\"--t1 'l\"?-----85 49 - --_.!_, -,..-----a+----e\u0026------.1,-.--------------- 3 l .. B 9:5 :59 36  67 ~l 30  28 ::!2 6 .. UJ R 2 l lM 2 I l 0 0 0 .. S 2 l 1 w 2 l 1 ,. O 0 0  -- -- --   -  ft-  - -6~--- - - - -~4----lB ... -   49- ---- EIS.----1:,,._.-- .l a------1Hil-----t---o ..... -------------- S \"'\"' 32 12  3:5 2  11  9 e l .. 17 R O O O  0 0 0  0 0 0 .. e o o o .. o o o ,. o 0 0 .. - - ----- - TOT~f\"t!:,-fttf'\"t.,._\"-ILL11111---- ---~2d'l\"---eso--.....a? - --'9\u0026o-- ___....s.,.~--aff--tt---l:!lot-------liets-----..:.,,,1,-..... ------------- TOTAL STUDENTS--- 702 438 264 t0 4fl'4 270 206 \" 218 l,',O :;a .. t------------------ -- ------------- t------------------------ - - --- --------------- ----- - - --------------------------------------------- ,_ __________ __ . --- ------ ----- - - ------------------- ---- ------ ---------------- -- -------------------------- --------- ------- --------------------------- --------- - - --- ----------------- ------------- - ------------- - --------- ---------- - - - ----- -------- ---------------. -- -------  ------ ----- ------ ---- ---- ------ - -- -- --  \u003e----------- --- -- - -- --- --- - ----- - -- - -- - ------------ ------ --- -- ----- - ----- - --- - - - ---- - - - -------------------- --------- - ----------- ----- - - - - ---------- - - - --- - -------------- --- ------- -------- - - --- - ------- - -- -- -- ------ ------ - ----- - ---------- ----- --- ------ ------------ -------------  ... ... --- --  - - --- - --. -- - ------- - -- - - ---  ------ ------- --- ----------------- .. .   - - --- --  ---------- ----- - - -- ---------- -- - -- ----- -- ----------- Ref : ' DlBOl- Fll E \u003cEAR : NU'\u003cSD9:S CUHULi\\TIVE 026 HOBE CITY HlVDLE SCHOOL CODE DESCR?PTtnN Ol 02 - cc,n'f'rnc wl th Prnt - -- c,,nfranc with atudent f\"rlvllv Dnld 9.t,avlor Contract - -oa---- Dtantlan Hll -------- 07 Student Will Hak Up lime Dt10c:lplln y R-nl !.um,narv ,,c i I on T. k ., .. f\"\u003c- r\u003cEFE:RRA "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1641","title":"Court Filings concerning motion to release incentive school Kindergarten seats and four-year-old program seats, court proceedings on settlement agreement, and incentive schools","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1996-08-02/1996-08-09"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Special districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Arkansas. Department of Education","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Education and state","Educational planning","School management and organization","School integration","School employees","Student assistance programs"],"dcterms_title":["Court Filings concerning motion to release incentive school Kindergarten seats and four-year-old program seats, court proceedings on settlement agreement, and incentive schools"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1641"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["24 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"District Court, motion to release incentive school Kindergarten seats and four-year-old program seats; District Court, motion for extension of time; District Court, Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) motion to clarify the court's orders of June 15, 1993, and July 14, 1993; District Court, response of Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) to motion to intervene as defendants; District Court, separate response of the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) to the answer of intervenor school districts to the second motion of the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) to enforce settlement agreement with the state; District Court, Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) response to respondent Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for abstention; District Court, Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) brief in support of response to respondent Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for abstention; District Court, amendment and supplement to the second motion of the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) to enforce settlement agreement with the state; District Court, three motions for extension of time; District Court, Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) response to Joshua's motion for implementation of recommendations of the Office of Desegregation Monitoring; District Court, Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) response to Joshua's motion for relief concerning incentive schools; District Court, memorandum brief in support of Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) response to Joshua's motion for relief concerning incentive schools and to Joshua's motion for implementation of recommendations of the Office of Desegregation Monitoring; District Court, Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) supplement to motion to modify desegregation plan dated July 30, 1996  The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION AUG ~ 1996 Office of Desegregation Moni1orm9 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL DEFENDANTS INT ERVEN ORS INTERVENORS MOTION TO RELEASE INCENTIVE SCHOOL KINDERGARTEN SEATS AND FOUR-YEAR-OLD PROGRAM SEATS The Little Rock School District (LRSD), for its Motion To Release Incentive School Kindergarten Seats and Four-Year-Old Program Seats, states: 1. The LRSD engaged in vigorous recruitment efforts during the 1995-96 school year as it prepared for registration for the 1996-97 school year. Attached hereto as Exhibit I is a partial listing of those recruitment efforts conducted by the district. Additionally, the information contained in the district's quarterly program planning and budget document status reports and project management tools serve to supplement this listing . .. 2. Although the recruitment efforts yielded positive results, seats still remain vacant in the LRSD's four-year-old program as well as the kindergarten level in the incentive schools. 3. Taking into consideration the importance of reserving seats for the recruitment of white students, the LRSD made special efforts during the recruitment season to register as many new white students as possible into these programs. Since seats still remain vacant, LRSD submits that the vacant seats should now be released to black students who can benefit from the educational opportunities which will be provided. By doing so, the district is not retreating from its obligation to continue to vigorously recruit white students into the designated schools. Rather, the LRSD is merely recognizing the importance of disparity elimination through early childhood educational opportunities. 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a copy of the LRSD fouryear- old assignments and kindergarten assignments for the 1996-97 school year as of July 10, 1996. 5. The LRSD will continue its vigorous recruitment efforts and will determine what adjustments are necessary and appropriate to ensure that the impact of this action on future year enrollments can be minimized to the greatest extent possible. WHEREFORE, the Little Rock School District moves the court for an order permitting it to release the vacant seats at the kindergarten level in incentive schools as well as the vacant seats at the four-year-old program sits as reflected by the attached exhibit; that it be awarded all legal and proper relief to which it may be entitled. btbyll.RSD-lac.Fau, 2 Respectfully submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026 CLARK 2000 First Commercial Building 400 West Capitol Street Little Rock, AR 72201 ( 501) 376-2011 Attorneys for Plaintiff Christopher He Bar No. 81083 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion To Release Incentive School Kindergarten Seats And Four-Year-Old Program Seats has been served on the following by depositing copy of same in the United States mail on this 1st day of August, 1996: Mr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 172 3 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026 Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Roachell Law Firm 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown - HAND DELIVERED Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 bllQ,ILRSD-Inc.F..., 3 Mr. Timothy G. Gauger Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 bll,y\\LRSO.lnc.Four 4 November 1, 1995 To: From: Re: JULY Nancy Acre, Director of Student Assignment Becky Rather \u0026 Essie Middleton, Parent Recruiters Recruitment Report, 1st Quarter, 95-96 Developed ad for Kid's Directory featuring Incentive Schools, CARE, 4-year-old program and registration dates. Met monthly with PTA Council. Mailed letter to all white students on 4-year-old waiting lists offering available seats. Mailed 84 letters to ministers, including registration flyer. Sent memo to principals about open house dates. Sent memo to principals listing upcoming recruitment dates and opportunities. Participated in PTA Summer Leadership conference discussing public relations and newsletters. AUGUST Worked with Pat Price to develop, typeset and print new generic 4-year-old brochure. Spent two days placing registration posters throughout city at grocery stores, housing projects, medical offices. Department of Human Services, etc. Put individual school recruitment plan outlines on disks and offered to all schools who requested them. (Some wanted to continue using hard copy outlines and a typewriter.) Participated in Governor's Press Conference proclaiming Arkansas Public School's Week. Met with Quapaw Realty. Participated in PTA Council pre-schoo,l workshop. Met with McKay Realty. Gathered and delivered Parent Involvement information to five incentive schools. Participated in booth on LRSD at African American Heritage Celebration at Philander Smith College. Met with new magnet coordinator and principal at Henderson on recruitment ideas. Met with Rightsell on setting up Parent Involvement. Held Open Houses in all schools. Met with Franklin on recruitment. SEPTEMBER Held brainstorming/planning sessions ~ith new Director of Student Assignment. Secured home owners association lists from City hall. Sent memo to Principals on recruitment training session. Met with Geyer Springs recruitment ream. Gathered lists of names of recruitment team members from each school. Worked with Connie Whitfield, Advocates for Children, in identifying target neighborhood with low parental involvement and Kids at risk. Mitchell Incentive was selected. Worked with Rector, Phillips, Morris Realtors. Worked with ReMax Realty. Worked with Winrock Development Company, (Real Estate Developers) Worked with Janet Jones Realty Participated in two meetings with Pulaski County Parents (one South and one North of the river.) Revised Recruitment Timeline Calendar. Julie Wiedower represented office in Magnet meeting. Recruitment training meeting with principals (especially new principals) and recruitment team leaders. Met with Washington recruitment meeting. Met with Dodd recruitment team. Met with Parkview recruitment team. Revised recruitment timeline calendar. Conducted tours for 21 families from July through September. - - Jan. 5, 1996 To: From: Re: Oct. 2 Oct. 3 Oct. 3 Oct. 5 Oct. 5 Oct. 6 Oct. 10 Oct. 11 Oct. 11 Oct . 12 Oct. 16 Oct. 16 Oct. 16 Oct. 17 Oct. 17 Oct. 17 Oct. 18 Oct. 18 Oct. 19 Oct. 19 Oct. 20 Oct. 23 Oct. 24 Oct. 25 Nov. 6 Nov. 6 Nov. 7 Nov. 7 Nov. 9 Nov. 9 Nov. 10 Nov. 10 Nov. 14 Nov. 14 Nov. 15 Nov. 21 Nov. 27 Nov. 27 Nov. 30 Nancy Acre, Director of Student Assignment Becky Rather, Essie Middleton, Parent Recruiters Recruitment activities, second quarter 95-96 Assist Henderson recruitment team Work with Incentive schools on reports due Work with Rector Phillips Morse Realty Participate in Arkansas Business Expo Work with Central recruitment team Assist Baseline recruitment team Attend PTA Council at Bale Attend program at Rockeferler Attend meeting on pre-registration brochure All individual school recruitment plans due Contact Connie Whitfield for parent involvement at Mitchell Meet with Booker recruitment team Meet with Rockefeller recruitment team Meet with Franklin recruitment team Assist Otter Creek recruitment team Assist Badgett recruitment team Meet with Dodd recruitment team Memo to principals requesting private school directories . Attend team meeting at McClellan Deliver information to McKay Realty Mail letters/ flyers to Neighborhood Associations. Assist Cloverdale Junior High team Assist Gibbs team Attend meeting with Mabelvale Jr. team Attend Henderson team meeting Assist Adkins, McNeill, Smith and Assoc. King recruitment team meeting Presentation to the \"Good Ole Girls Ne.t work\" Assist Rector Phillips Morse Realtors Meet with Washington Team Assist Adkins, McNeill, Smith and Assoc. Assist Rector Phillips Morse Realtors Attend PTA Council at Forest Park Meet with J.A . Fair recruitment team Bi-monthly recruitment survey due from all schools Evening meeting with 6th grade parents at Second Presbyterian Church. Assist Henderson recruitment team Assist Mann recruitment team Meet with Melissa Guildin, ODM Dec. 1 Dec. 1 Dec. 4 Dec. 5 Dec. 6 Dec. 7 Dec. 8 Dec. 12 Dec. 12 Dec. 13 Dec. 19 Presentation to Secretaries meeting on Magnet schools Assist Charlotte John realty Assist with two special tours at Mann Assist with two special tours at Forest Heights Assist with two special tours at Dunbar Assist with two special tours at Henderson Assist with two special tours at Pulaski Heights Attend PTA Council Washington Report to Biracial committee Assist Garland team Prepared Open House flyer for Garland Provided tours to 46 families during this quarter. June 3, 1996 To: From: Re: Nancy Acre, Director of student Assignment Becky Rather, Essie Middleton, Parent Recruiters Recruitment efforts for third quarter 95-96 Jan. 2 Held Registration training meetings with all school secretaries Jan. 8 Provided private school mailing labels to Magnet Review Committee, schools upon request. Jan. 9 Attend PTA Council at Mann Jan. 9 Participated in 6th grade recruitment for Junior High at Terry Jan. 9 Participated in 6th grade recruitment for Junior High at King. Jan. 12-13 Participated in Park Plaza Mall Show Jan. 15 Bi-Monthly recruitment survey due in from all schools. Jan. 16 encourage Jan. 16 the city. Mailed letters to all P-4s on waiting list to Kindergarten registration. Mail letters to churches and daycares throughout Jan. 16 Sent private school lists to all area schools. Jan. 16 Picked up PCSSD labels for incentive schools. Jan. 18 Held special tours for parents of 6th graders to Junior Highs. Jan. 19 Mailed 2,000 pre-registration brochures to private school students. Jan. 22 Open House, Incentive and Interdistrict Schools Jan. 22 Met with Early Childhood Advisory Committee. Provided pre-registration information and posters. Jan. 23 Presentation to Charlotte John Realtors Jan. 23 Mailed registration brochures to 25,000 LRSD households. Jan. 23 Presentation to HIPPY parents at McClellan Jan. 23 Open House, Elementary Magnets Jan. 24 Open House, Secondary Magnets Jan. 24 Assist Wilson School Recruitment teams. Jan. 24 Provide Assistance to Caldwell Banker Realtors Jan. 29-Feb. 2 CHECK US OUT WEEK! Jan. 29 Open House, Elementary Area Schools JAN. 29 Display posters throughout the city. Jan. 29 Assist Fair Park Recruitment Team Jan. 30 Open House Secondary Area Schools Jan. 30 Presentation to HIPPY Horne Visitors Jan. 31 Participated in Dunbar Recruitment Program Jan. 31 Display posters throughout the city in housing projects, grocery stores, day care centers, etc .. Feb. 1 Feb. 5 Iniervice Secretaries on pre-registration Pre-registration open through Feb. 16. Feb. 5 - Feb. 6 Feb. 12 Feb. 13 Feb. 14 Feb. 19 Feb. 19 Feb. 20 Feb. 27 Feb. 29 Mar. 1 Mar. 7 Mar. 11 Mar. 12 Mar. 12 Mar. 12 Mar. 14 Mar. 15 Mar. 26 Mar. 27 Provided quarter. Assist Caldwell Banker Realty Give Biracial report Meet with Wilson Recruitment Team Attend Open House at Metropolitan Assist Rainey Realty Participate in Early Childhood Meeting Attend Parent Involvement meeting Participate in PTA Founders Day program Speak at Bayou Mete in PCSSD Work with Mccaskell Realty Attend opening of Chicot School Parent Involvement meeting Participate in Early Childhood Fun Fest at King Attend PTA Council at Rockefeller Attend meeting of AllianFe for our Public Schools Attend program at Booker Assist national Early Childhood tour Rockefeller Bimonthly recruitment report due from all schools. Assist Wilson recruitment teams. Meet with Alliance for Our Public Schools 46 tours to individual families during this June 5, 1996 To: From: Re: Apr. 2 Apr. 3 Apr. 5 Apr. 9 Apr. 10 Apr. 1() Apr. 15 Apr. 15 Apr. 23 Apr. 24 Apr. 30 May 1 May 7 May 7\u00268 May 8 May 13 May 14 May 16 May 19 May 20 May 22 May 29 June 4 Nancy Acre, Director of Student Assignment Becky Rather, Essie Middleton, Parent Recruiters Fourth Quarter, 95-96, as of June 4, 1996 Recruitment report presented to Biracial committee Meet with Selma Hobby on obligations Notify 4-year-olds of assignments Attend PTA Council at Woodruff Assist Atkins, McNeil Realty . Attend meeting for Alliance for Our Public Schools Attend Early Childhood meeting Attend Parent Involvenent Meeting Participate in PBD audit Assist Rector Phillips Morse Realty Assist Dodd with recruitment Attend meeting for Alliance for Our Public Schools Assist Caldwell Banker Realty Show and Tell in all LR schools Provide 25 Realtor packets for Atkins, McNeil Attend Parent Involvement Meeting Attend PTA Council at Carver Attend reception at Mann HIPPY graduation Attend Early Childhood meeting Attend meeting for Alliance for Our Public Schools Assist Janet Jones Realty Make report to Biracial Committee Recruiters provided tours to 37 families during the first two months of this quarter. With each family the recruiters provide tours to an average of 3 to 4 schools, depending on the number cf children, grade levels, requests and time allowed. Most of our concentration is with residents moving into the city. Most local residents prefer to tour schools on their own time. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUR YEAR OLD ENROLLMENT 1996-97 Enrolled Waiting List / TOTAL 360 242 6021 118 59. 80% 870 58 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT KINDERGARTEN ASSIGNMENTS AT INCENTIVE SCHOOLS 1996 -97 Enrolled Waiting Lis 18 18 ..  :5i4s 36 18 36 720 SCHOOL BL NBL TLT Vacancies %BLACK BL NBL CAPACITY FRANKLIN 70 5 75 25 93.33% 21 0 100 GARLAND 22 4 26 14 84.62% 11 0 40 MITCHELL 27 1 28 12 96.43% 12 0 40 RIGHTS ELL 24 2 26 14 92.31% 15 0 40 ROCKEFELLER 29 28 57 3 50.88% 44 0 60 TOTAL 172 40 212 68 81 .13% 103 0 280 - - - - -- - - HERSCHEL H . FRIDAY C1122 1114J WILLIAM H . SUTTON, P. A . JAMES W. MOORE IYRON M . EISEMAN , JR., P. A .  . BELL, P. A . C . ECHOLS , P. A . S A . BUTTRY, P.A . ERICKS . URSERY , P. A . H . T . LARZELERE, P. A . OSCAR E. DAVIS, JR ,, P. A. JAMES C. CLARK , JR ., P.A. THOMAS P. LEGGETT, P.A. JOHN DEWEY WATSON, P . A . PAUL 8 . BENHAM Ill. P. A . .,,.,,. LARRY W. BURKS , P.A. - A . WYCKLIFF NISBET, JR ., P.A . JAMES EDWARD HARRIS, P. A . J . PHILLIP MALCOM, P. A . JAMES M . SIMPSON, P. A. MEREDITH P. CATLETT , P.A . JAMES M . SAXTON, P.A . J . SHEPHERD RUSSELL 111, P. A . DONALD H. BACON, P. A . WILLIAM THOMAS BAXTER , P. A . WALTER A . PAULSON 11, P. A . BARRY E. COPLIN, P. A. RICHARD 0 . TAYLOR, P. A . JOSEPH 8 . HURST, JR ,, P. A . ELIZABETH ROBBEN MURRAY, P. A . CHRISTOPHER HELLER , P .A. LAURA HENSLEY SMITH , P. A. ROBERTS . SHAFER, P.A . WILLIAM M. GRIFFIN Ill , P .A . THOMAS N. ROSE, P . A . MICHAELS. MOORE, P. A . DIANE S . MACKEY , P. A . WALTER M . EBEL 111, P. A . KEVIN A . CRASS , P. A . WILLIAM A . WADDELL, JR ., P. A . FRIDAY, ELDR'EDGE \u0026 CLARK A PARTNERSHIP OF INDIVIDUALS AND PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2000 FIRST COMMERCIAL BUILDING 400 WEST CAPITOL LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 -3493 TELEPHONE 601 - 3782011 FAX NO. 601-3762147 August 2, 1996 RECEIVED AUG_, 1996 Office of Dase . gresation Monitorin9 Hon. James W. McCormack Clerk of Court United States District Court Eastern District of Arkansas 600 W. Capitol, Suite 402 Little Rock~ AR 72201-3325 Re: Little Rock School District, et al vs. Pulaski County Special School District, et al USDC No. LR-C-82-866 Dear Mr. McCormack ! /; SCOTT' J , LANCASTER , P. A . M . QA/'ILE COPILEY , P . A . ROIERT I. BEACH , JR . , P.A. J . LEE BROWN, P .A . JAMES C . IAKER, JR . , P. A . HARRY A . LIOHT , P. A . SCOTT H . TUCKER , P . A . JOH.N CLAYTON RANDOLPH , P. A . OUY ALTON WADE , P . A . PRICE C , GARDNER , P . A . J . MICHAEL r!CKENS , P. A . TONIA P. JONES, P. A. DAVID D . WILSON . P. A . JEFFREY H . MOORE , P.A . ANDREW T . TURNER DAVID M . GRAF CARLA G . SPAINHOUR JOHN C . FENDLEY, JR. ALLISON OR AVES JOHANN C . ROOSEVELT R . CHRISTOPHER LAWSON GREGORY 0. TAYLOR TONY L. WILCOX FRAN C . HICKMAN 9ETTY J . DEMORY IARBARA J . RAND JAMES W. SMITH CLIFFORD W . PLUNKETT WILL BONO DANIELL. HERRINGTON ALLISON J. CORNWELL o, COUNIH WILLIAM J. SMITH 8 . S . CLARK WILLIAM L. TERRY, P. A . WILLIAM L. PATTON , JR ., P. A . un11 OlfllCT NO , (5011 370-3323 Enclosed herewith please find an original and three copies of the Little Rock School District's Motion for Extension of Time with regard to the above-captioned matter. Please file same and return a file marked copy to us. By copy of this letter we are serving all counsel of record. JCFjr/cf Enclosures cc: Mr. John Walker (w/encl.) Mr. Sam Jones (w/encl.) Mr. Steve Jones (w/encl.) Sincerely, John C. Fendley, Jr. Mr. Richard Roachell) (w/encl.) Ms. Ann Brown (w/encl.) Mr. Timothy G. Gauger (w/encl.) Hon. Susan Webber Wright (w/encl.) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVIS-ION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. LR-C-82-866 1996 RECEIVED t I ! AUG :5 1996 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL Off ice ot Desegregation Monitoring . ...:... -. DEFENDANTS ~ , , ~ .,. ..... MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ~  .\u003c1 ~ . - -.....~-,., INTERVENORS INT ERVEN ORS The Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") for its Motion for Extension of Time states: 1. On August 1, 1996, LRSD was served with Joshua's Response to LRSD's Motion to End Federal Court Jurisdiction (\"Joshua's Response\"). Because of the issues raised in Joshua's Response, it is necessary for LRSD to prepare a Reply thereto. 2. Due to other obligations of counsel for LRSD, including LRSD's Response to the Motion of the Joshua Intervenors for Relief Concerning the Incentive Schools due August 9, 1996, LRSD needs additional time to prepare its Reply. Accordingly, LRSD respectfully requests that it be granted leave to file its Reply to Joshua's Response on or before August 30, 1996. 3. Based on statements made by the Court in recent hearings related to the Court's docket, it appears this matter will not be scheduled for a hearing in the near future. Thus, the additional time requested by LRSD should not result in any prejudice to Joshua or undue delay of these proceedings . WHEREFORE, LRSD prays that it be granted leave to file its Reply to Joshua's Response to LRSD's Motion to End Federal Court Jurisdiction on or before August 30, 1996. Respectfully Submitted, Christopher Heller John c. Fendley Jr. Friday Eldredge \u0026 Clark 2000 First Commercial B.ldg. 400 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201-3407 Attorneys For LRSD B Bar No. 81083 2 I I , i i .' CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE  I certify that a copy of the foregoing motion has been served on the following peo~l~ by depositing copy of same in the United States mail on this-~- day of August, 1996. Mr. John W. Walker JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Sam Jones Wright, Lindsey \u0026 Jennings 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES, P.A. 3400 Capitol Towers Capitol \u0026 Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell Mr. Travis Creed Roachell Law Firm First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Timothy G. Gauger Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Cistopher Heller 1 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRIG--T---l:JO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. ij,O .. LR-C-82-866 AUG 2 1996 ~ : f'0,,,.,., Office of Desegregation Mornionuv PCS SD MOTION TO CLARI,B.Y-.!r,HE--,C..Q~'l'..-~)L 9~~RS OF JUNE 15, 1993 AND JULY 14, 1993 PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS On June 15, 1993 the Court approved the District's proposed restructuring of its bonded indebtedness and on July 14, 1993, the Court approved the District's plan for its early retirement incentive program. By approving the motions, the Court likewise approved the District's establishment of its desegregation contingency fund designed to help the PCSSD survive the loss of state settlement monies. The stream of payments from the State expired during the 1995-96 school year. In each order, the District Court included language, as requested by the PCSSD, exempting the savings from certain teacher salary requirements under Act 34. Act 34 was declared unconstitutional in the Lake View case and it was replaced with Act 917 of 1995 which contains new and different requirements concerning teacher salaries, including an amendment to the minimum salary law. By this motion, the PCSSD seeks clarification as to whether and to what extent the 1993 orders 1 - should exempt the savings generated by the Court approved plans from the operation of the new Act 917. The savings It is reasonably clear that the savings generated from these two court approved programs are earmarked substantially, it not exclusively, for the District's desegregation activities. It is reasonably clear that the Court did not intend for these savings to be used for increases in teacher salaries and it is reasonably clear that the District told the Court in 1993 that they would not be used to fund increases in teacher salaries. The savings are nonrecurring revenues and the District Court has admonished all three school districts against using nonrecurring revenues to fund recurring expenses. The New Law Ark. Code Ann.  6-17-1001 is the minimum base salary law as enacted by the Arkansas Legislature. Section 8 of Act 917 of 1995 amended the statute to require a minimum salary of $20,000 for employees holding a bachelor's degree with no experience and $23,000 for employees holding a master's degree and no experience. The Act further specified minimum salaries for these categories for each year ranging up to employees with 14 years or more experience. Further, the Act specifies minimum increments of $400 annually for teachers with between one and thirteen years of experience. If the PCSSD were to literally comply with these new statutory requirements, it would require an expenditure during 2 - 1996-97 of approximately $1,375,000 in additional funds for an average across the board raise for certified teachers only of 2.84%. The minimum salary law was part of Act 917, the principal feature of which was to provide the new state funding program to replace the system declared as unconstitutional in the Lake View case. Dr. Benny L. Gooden in his paper \"Arkansas School Funding Plan, An Analysis and Opinion\", dated June, 1996, has observed as regards these provisions that: In most cases, Act 917 expenditure requirements appear to be the result of a mathematically derived assumption regarding the level of expenditure which may be appropriate to support certain purportedly desired activities.  Unfortunately, there is probably little sound or reasonable basis for the expenditure levels which are contained in the act. Analysis at page 25. When the distribution of revenue earmarked for salaries was not part of the final provisions in the act, an expenditure requirement of the type found in Act 917 was retained. It is clearly inappropriate and will prove problematic if not impossible to evaluate for many school districts. In its present form, the provision is virtually meaningless and certainly bears no relationship to its purported purpose. It is clear that the salary provisions contained in this act are based upon objectives other than the equitable distribution of school funds and appear to transcend reason in an attempt to restrict the ability of local school districts in managing revenues and expenditures. Analysis at page 26. 3 The History On April 1, 1993, the PCSSD filed its motion seeking the court's approval of its early retirement program and a major restructuring of its bonded indebtedness. That motion stated at page 8 that: PCSSD needs to shield the savings in column 4 from the 56% clause in Act 34. It needs to use these savings instead as an additional source of funds to help compensate for the loss of settlement funds. At page 9 of the motion, the PCSSD promised the Court that: The money from the early retirement program and the savings from restructuring of the debt would be placed in a desegregation contingency fund to help PCSSD survive the loss of the settlement monies. on June 28, 1993, the PCSSD submitted a business case to the Court in support of the early retirement program headed: - \"Program Analysis for the Early Retirement Incentive Program\". The opening paragraph of the analysis stated in part that: The Early Retirement Incentive Program is designed to reduce personnel costs to reduce recurring expenditures. In its \"Forcefield Analysis\" section of the Business Case, the PCSSD first noted who the forces would be that would support the plan. In discussing the forces which might oppose the plan, the PCSSD observed to the Court that: Some employees may oppose the plan to the extent that it precludes application of the savings to salary increases. The District Court approved the PCSSD plan to refinance its current bonded indebtedness on June 15, 1993. In that order, the Court found that: \" the savings the PCSSD realizes from 4 - refinancing are exempt from the new revenue requirements of 1983 (Ex. Sess.) Ark. Acts 34; Ark. Code Ann. S 6-20-301, et seq. The District Court approved the early retirement incentive program on July 14, 1993 and likewise exempted the savings to be realized from it from the same statutory provisions. The clear import of this exemption is to restrict the PCSSD's use of those savings and to protect them from the operation of Act 34 which required that 56% of \"new revenues\" be paid out as teacher salaries. Of course, the Arkansas Legislature has replaced Act 34 with Act 917 of 1995. While Act 917 no longer contains the 56% \"new revenue\" provision, it has replaced that with different directives regarding the proportion of State aid that must be paid toward teacher salaries and has further amended the minimum - salary law to impose the new unfunded mandates as described above. Requested Relief To the extent that Act 917 should now be substituted for Act 34 as specified in the June 15, 1995 and July 14, 1995 orders, the PCSSD seeks the Court's clarification as to the effects of Act 917 upon the \"savings\" which the PCSSD has realized and has segregated. WHEREFORE, the PCSSD prays for an order of this court amending and/or clarifying the June 15, 1993 and July 14, 1993 orders given the passage of Act 917 of 1995. 5 Respectfully submitted: WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 200 West Capitol Avenue Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3699 (501) 371-0808 --..---7 ,,,---; ( ~ By ~'; 7 . . _,~-'(___ ~ M. Samuel Jones II (76060) Attorney , for Pulaski County s~~~School District CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On August __2-_-- , 1996, a copy of the foregoing was served by U.S. mail on the following persons: Mr. John w. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 400 w. Capitol, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Stephen w. Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Richard w. Roachell Roachell and street First Federal Plaza 410 w. Capitol, suite 504 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Timothy Gauger Assistant Attorney General 323Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Ms. Ann Brown ODM Heritage West Bldg., Ste. 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 M. Sam el )Jones _, I I : __ / 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. BLYTHEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT; BRYANT SCHOOL DISTRICT; FORT SMITH SCHOOL DISTRICT; WEST MEMPHIS SCHOOL DISTRICT; ALTUS-DENNING SCHOOL DISTRICT; ASHDOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT; BARTON-LEXA SCHOOL DISTRICT; BATESVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT; BIGGERS-REYNO SCHOOL DISTRICT; BLACK ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT; BRIGHT STAR SCHOOL DISTRICT; BRINKLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT; PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS AUG 2 1996 CENTERPOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT; CLARENDON Off SCHOOL DISTRICT; COTTON PLANT SCHOOL DISTRICT; lCS of Dasegregaticn Monitoring CUTTER MORNING STAR SCHOOL DISTRICT; - ~- -- DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT; DOLLARWAY SCHOOL DISTRICT; --~.-- ~ ,,.  ~... .,....,. ..,_, ~ FOREMAN SCHOOL DISTRICT; FOUNTAIN LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT; GILLETT SCHOOL DISTRICT; GLEN ROSE SCHOOL DISTRICT; GUY-PERKINS SCHOOL DISTRICT; HOXIE SCHOOL DISTRICT; JONESBORO SCHOOL DISTRICT; KIRBY SCHOOL DISTRICT; LAVACA SCHOOL DISTRICT; LEWISVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT, MAGAZINE SCHOOL DISTRICT; MALVERN SCHOOL DISTRICT; MAMMOTH SPRING SCHOOL DISTRICT; MANILA SCHOOL DISTRICT; MAYNARD SCHOOL DISTRICT, NORTHEAST ARKANSAS SCHOOL DISTRICT; ODEN SCHOOL DISTRICT; OZARK SCHOOL DISTRICT; PLAINVIEW-ROVER SCHOOL DISTRICT; POCAHONTAS SCHOOL DISTRICT; PRAIRIE GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT; SOUTH CONWAY SCHOOL DISTRICT; SPRING HILL SCHOOL DISTRICT; STAMPS SCHOOL DISTRICT; STEPHENS SCHOOL DISTRICT; TURRELL SCHOOL DISTRICT; VAN BUREN SCHOOL DISTRICT; WARREN SCHOOL DISTRICT; WATSON CHAPEL SCHOOL DISTRICT; WEST FORK SCHOOL DISTRICT; WHITE HALL SCHOOL DISTRICT; WINSLOW SCHOOL DISTRICT; WONDERVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT; and YELLVILLE-SUMMIT SCHOOL DISTRICT RESPONSE OF PCSSD TO MOTION TO INTERVENE AS DEFENDANTS 1 INTERVENORS The Pulaski County Special School District (\"PCSSD\") for its response to motion to intervene states: 1. While the PCSSD could assert significant objections to and grounds to defeat the motion to intervene, it has elected to waive them. Accordingly, the PCSSD interposes no objection to the motion to intervene. WHEREFORE, the PCSSD prays for an order of this Court which simultaneously grants the motion to intervene, designates the intervening districts as full-time defendants in this action, and which subjects the intervening defendants as appropriate to the outstanding and future orders of this Court. Respectfully submitted: WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 200 West Capitol Avenue Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3699 (501) 371-0808 By ___ ?\"-_,,.----+--------- M. (76060) At ski County Sp col District 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On Au "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1649","title":"Court Filings: District Court, memorandum in support of Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's) separate response to the answer of intervenor school districts to the second motion of the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) to enforce settlement agreement with the state","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1996-08-02"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Special districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Joshua Intervenors","Education--Arkansas","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Finance","Education--Evaluation","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School management and organization","School integration","Student assistance programs"],"dcterms_title":["Court Filings: District Court, memorandum in support of Pulaski County Special School District's (PCSSD's) separate response to the answer of intervenor school districts to the second motion of the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) to enforce settlement agreement with the state"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1649"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["92 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  ''  IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL. BLYTHEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT; BRYANT SCHOOL DISTRICT; FORT SMITH SCHOOL DISTRICT; WEST MEMPHIS SCHOOL DISTRICT; ALTUS-DENNING SCHOOL DISTRICT; ASHDOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT; BARTON-LEXA SCHOOL DISTRICT; BATESVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT; BIGGERS-REYNO SCHOOL DISTRICT; BLACK ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT; BRIGHT STAR PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS SCHOOL DISTRICT; BRINKLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT; AUG 2 1996 CENTERPOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT; CLARENDON SCHOOL DISTRICT; COTTON PLANT SCHOOL DISTRICT;  .; :, C-p,/'\\-f ~ : CUTTER MORNING STAR SCHOOL DISTRICT; Office of Oesa~regat:on M01111or,n9 DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT; DOLLARWAY SCHOOL DISTRICT; FOREMAN SCHOOL DISTRICT; FOUNTAIN LAKE - - - -- ~- ---- - ... ,,--~~,._,_J \" SCHOOL DISTRICT; GILLETT SCHOOL DISTRICT; GLEN ROSE SCHOOL DISTRICT; GUY-PERKINS SCHOOL DISTRICT; HOXIE SCHOOL DISTRICT; JONESBORO SCHOOL DISTRICT; KIRBY SCHOOL DISTRICT; LAVACA SCHOOL DISTRICT; LEWISVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT, MAGAZINE SCHOOL DISTRICT; MALVERN SCHOOL DISTRICT; MAMMOTH SPRING SCHOOL DISTRICT; MANILA SCHOOL DISTRICT; MAYNARD SCHOOL DISTRICT, NORTHEAST ARKANSAS SCHOOL DISTRICT; ODEN SCHOOL DISTRICT; OZARK SCHOOL DISTRICT; PLAINVIEW-ROVER SCHOOL DISTRICT; POCAHONTAS SCHOOL DISTRICT; PRAIRIE GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT; SOUTH CONWAY SCHOOL DISTRICT; SPRING HILL SCHOOL DISTRICT; STAMPS SCHOOL DISTRICT; STEPHENS SCHOOL DISTRICT; TURRELL SCHOOL DISTRICT; VAN BUREN SCHOOL DISTRICT; WARREN SCHOOL DISTRICT; WATSON CHAPEL SCHOOL DISTRICT; WEST FORK SCHOOL DISTRICT; WHITE HALL SCHOOL DISTRICT; WINSLOW SCHOOL DISTRICT; WONDERVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT; and YELLVILLE-SUMMIT SCHOOL DISTRICT INTERVENORS MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PCSSD'S SEPARATE RESPONSE TO THE ANSWER OF INTERVENOR SCHOOL DISTRICTS I. TO THE SECOND MOTION OF THE PCSSD TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE INTRODUCTION As will be more fully explained below, the PCSSD will demonstrate how many features of the new funding system are neither fair, rational, nor of general application when applied to it and therefore violative of the Settlement Agreement. In their response to the PCSSD motion, the Intervenors ask that the U.S. District Court specifically find: \"[T)hat the features of the new funding formula of which the PCSSD is critical are fair and rational, of general applicability, and equitably afford equal oportunities to the students of the respective districts to which the state aid is or will be distributed; ... (Answer, at page 6). The PCSSD interprets the Intervenors request to include a court finding that the new funding scheme comports with the Settlement Agreement as well as with the equity requirements of the Lake View decision. For reasons which the PCSSD will review in some detail, the new funding scheme violates both of these provisions. In his definitive work, \"Arkansas School Funding Plan, An Analysis and Opinion\" (hereafter \"Analysis\"), Dr. Benny L. Gooden1 has effectively highlighted and explained the shortcomings of the new system of funding public education in 1Dr. Gooden is Superintendent of schools of the Fort Smith School District. His analysis was published in June, 1996 or some several weeks before the filing of the motion to intervene, and is attached as Exhibit A. The Fort Smith School District numbers among the 52 school districts seeking intervention. 2 Arkansas. Dr. Gooden's analysis centers around the State constitutional concepts of adequacy, equity and efficiency, concepts, as the Court will see, that are closely related to and intertwined with the settlement agreement tests of fair, rational, and of general application2  At page 29 of his Analysis, Dr. Gooden explains: In order to determine the actual increase in state aid for public schools, it is necessary to combine all the categories of funding distributed during 1995-96 and to compare this number with the appropriated and distributed amounts for 1996-97. The 1995-96 categories will include not only those funds distributed directly to local school districts but those transferred directly to other agencies on behalf of school districts for functions which will become a local responsibility during 1996-97 .... It is therefore conceivable that the actual difference in distributed state aid will be consumed within added categories as opposed to providing an increase in the state portion of the Base Local Revenue per student which is of benefit to all districts. Thus, in the PCSSD, the increases in formula funding projected by the State, when considered in conjunction with the unfunded mandates the State has imposed upon the PCSSD, cause the PCSSD to come out worse under the new funding scheme than the old when the entire picture is examined. In his summary, Dr. Gooden concludes as regards the new funding scheme that: It is conceivable that when this methodology is followed and new categories are analyzed for items such as debt service buy-out, facilities, student growth, etc., little or no real increase in revenue from state sources will be realized. 2The PCSSD still relies upon the provisions of the Settlement Agreement which obligate the State to continue the funding of certain programs. Certain of Dr. Gooden's factual conclusions are supportive of this proposition as well. 3 In view of the total analysis of school finance and in consideration of the issues of equity, adequacy, and efficiency, it appears that none of these essential components will be achieved through Act 917:  Adequacy appears unlikely in consideration of the declining commitment of state funds to support education with the subsequent loss of comparative school funds relative to neighboring states;  Equity appears unlikely in view of the failure of Act 917 to consider student needs and school district demographics;  Efficiency may be possible through a streamlined process which mathematically distributes funds by reducing categories and standardizing a means of calculating, but any system which requires \"Additional Base Revenue\" supplements to more than 200 districts to reach an arbitrary level can hardly be called \"efficient\". Gooden, at pages 35 and 36. These and other of Dr. Gooden's conclusions will be more fully explored below. Dr. Gooden has advised each school district to make its own analysis to determine just how it is affected under the new regime. The PCSSD has taken the following Gooden advice to heart: Comparisons of actual changes in state aid between 1995-96 and 1996-97 will be somewhat complicated and will require careful analysis on the part of each individual school district. It is clear that when a listing of state aid for each district is published for 1996-97 and a comparison is made to total state aid distributed to local districts during 1995-96, a large increase will be evident. However in order to determine the real difference, it is necessary to compute the payments which become the responsibility of local districts during 1996-97 in areas which were paid directly during 1995-96. Failure to fully describe all funds distributed for use by local schools in combination with school related payments made directly by the state will distort the 4 true picture. It is important for each local district to analyze required payments as outlined in Act 917 and to make a complete summary of categorical revenues received during 1995-96 in order to determine changes in revenue resulting from the implementation of the act. Gooden, at page 35. Act 917 contains provisions which dramatically change the foundation formula concepts which govern state aid and the treatment of revenue and expenditure responsibilities for each school district and for the state as a whole. Each of these conceptual changes has an overall and specific effect on Arkansas school districts, their programs, and their students. (Emphasis supplied.) Gooden, at page 9. II. TEACHER RETIREMENT At the time of the settlement, the State paid 100% of PCSSD's teacher retirement costs. That money was not, and has - never been, part of any kind of formula, never flowed through any formula, and therefore could never have been subject to any changes or revisions in any formula. On the other hand, if in fact the State calculated a sum of money to include in the new formula by utilizing students as compared to actual individual district costs3 , the PCSSD will demonstrate that this change is neither fair, rational nor equitable. Teacher retirement costs are calculated as a percentage function of district salaries. In districts such as the PCSSD which has high employee costs, basing teacher retirement funds on a per student basis cheats the PCSSD. Under this method, the 3Dr. Gooden confirms that the state in fact utilized this approach. See Exhibit A, page 15 (box). 5 PCSSD will receive approximately only 85% of its actual teacher retirement costs for 1995-96 and, in contrast, the Bryant School District, one of the intervenors, will receive approximately 122% reimbursement or a bonus of 22% more than its actual teacher retirement costs. It is important to note that the teacher retirement program has not been eliminated. The only thing that has been eliminated is the State's direct payment of the school districts' costs. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit has already made the finding that the Pulaski County districts are \"employee heavy\" and \"employee expensive\". The comparisons the Intervenors seek to make are thus both irrelevant and, at least in the case of the PCSSD, wrong. The use of certified staff comparisons necessarily fails to take into account that some of the expensive desegregation programs utilized by the PCSSD employ non-certified staff such as the home school counselors. Dr. Gooden has addressed this phenomenon of the change in teacher retirement as well as others. As he states: Some of the major changes in the manner of funding Arkansas schools will require considerable adjustment and will similarly exert a major impact on certain school districts. However, the effects will not be uniform throughout the state as the staffing patterns, demographic makeup of student population, and other factors are considered. [Emphasis added.] Gooden, at page 15. The PCSSD submits that if the effects are not \"uniform\" they cannot be regarded as \"general\" either. 6 In a provision which also substantially affects the PCSSD, Dr. Gooden has identified yet another problem: A significant and unanticipated problem associated with teacher retirement lies in retirement contribution for food service employees, adult education staff, and others who function in programs with a limited revenue source. No appropriation increase was provided for adult education in order to fund the required retirement match which was previously paid by the state nor was a line item appropriation provided for separate contributions. School food service employees participating in the retirement system will result in a 12 percent increased labor expense which should appropriately be borne by consumers of school lunches. In view of the fact that a significant number of school lunches are served free or reduced with no means of increasing income, (federal reimbursement is set at a fixed rate per lunch) it appears unlikely that the increased cost could reasonably be recovered through increased charges for paid lunches. Gooden, at page 15. Further, the conclusion he reaches as regards the Fort Smith School District applies to the PCSSD as well: The projected cost for making payments for the retirement matching on Fort Smith Public School employees during 1996-97 is projected to be $4,736,000. It is reasonable to assume that the pro-rated share of the total amount currently being appropriated statewide for retirement matching divided by ADM will result in proportionally less for Fort Smith than for many other districts. This is due in large measure to the higher salary levels enjoyed by our staff in comparison to their counterparts around Arkansas. Gooden, at page 15. III. SPECIAL EDUCATION The elimination of the weighting system for special education students unfairly penalizes the PCSSD for several reasons. It has proportionately more special education students than the state average and, therefore, appropriately received 7 - proportionately more state aid for their education under the old formula. In addition, the special education program of the PCSSD is superior, and more expensive, than the special education programs in most other districts. The PCSSD provides a more intensive level of physical therapy, a more intensive level of occupational therapy, a more intensive level of speech therapy than the average district and, pays these specialists more than does the average district. Thus, the elimination of the weights does not affect the Pesso \"to the same degree\" as other districts. Dr. Gooden apparently concurs with the position of the PCSSD on this issue. As he explains: Funding for special education has been distributed based upon the sum of pupil weights generated by the various categories of student placement. Students requiring services of high intensity have provided greater weights and subsequently more funding than those whose disabilities require a less intense service level. Beginning in 1996-97, funding to support special education is included in the base equalization amounts distributed on the basis of ADM without regard to the special education population or the level of services required in any individual school district. The great diversity between the composition of a disabled population among various school districts makes this category a great contributor to inequities resulting from provisions of Act 917. Districts with high concentrations of seriously disabled students will be at a distinct disadvantage when compared to districts whose student population does not include such severe disabilities. Gooden, at pages 18 and 19. IV. NEED BASED AID VERSUS HEAD COUNTS Basing State aid almost exclusively on a head count of students ignores reality. Such a system benefits districts that 8 pay low salaries because they will receive more money for teacher retirement than they actually pay. Such a system benefits districts which manage to avoid providing health insurance to large numbers of their employees as they will be paid more than their health insurance costs. Such a program benefits districts which are not desegregating or which otherwise do not transport large numbers of children because they will be paid more than their actual transportation costs. The new system also benefits districts which make little local effort to pass maintenance and operations millages because under the new system the State will come in and \"make up the difference\" to squeeze them within the equity guidelines. The new funding system ignores the high costs of special - education, ignores the high cost of desegregation, ignores the wide disparity among districts in salary requirements and, because of these reasons and others, cannot be regarded as fair and rational even if it is general. As Dr. Gooden explains: The first item requiring a paradigm shift for Arkansas educators lies in the dramatic departure of the school aid formula encompassed by Act 917 from an earlier format. Specifically, the prior formula distributed school aid to school districts in a large number of categories including general Minimum Foundation Program Aid (MFPA) based upon the weighted number of students; special education aid determined by the cumulative pupil weights reflecting the intensity of service requirement; transportation aid based upon a formula reflecting routes, students, and density; vocational aid reflecting the sum of pupil weights determined by the assumed relative cost of providing vocational programs; gifted and talented aid determined by the number of students served up to an established limit; and specific categorical aid for alternative programs, 9 summer school, limited English proficient students, and compensatory education. The school aid formula reflected by Act 917 in effect combines all the current aid provisions detailed above into one item of aid-per-student which is calculated based upon the simplest factor: Average Daily Membership (ADM). The concept of varying needs based upon the composition of the student population, the program of instruction provided, the geographic terrain, or other factors is not considered under the new formula. School districts with high wealth and/or high-cost students with regard to special education, limited English proficiency, costly vocational offerings, or extensive transportation systems may be expected to be adversely affected using this methodology. Gooden, at pages 9 and 10. Specifically, attempts to meet the Court-adopted standard of the Federal Range Ratio have led to an exacerbation of prior formula provisions contained in the \"second tier\" equalization funding. By including an additional funding category of \"Additional Base Funding\" supported by a line-item appropriation, the departure from an orderly formula distribution based upon wealth, student needs, and district characteristics has been lost. An additional problem associated with the implementation of this formula characteristic lies in the provision of a disincentive for local districts to increase millage rates when revenue increased through local taxation would be deducted from Additional Base Funding provided to more than 200 Arkansas districts. This unanticipated consequence is a serious defect which can only depress support for Arkansas schools by making it unlikely that many communities will tax themselves in order to supplant state revenue. one subtle yet significant effect of using simple ADM as opposed to Weighted Average Daily Membership (WADM) in order to adequately reflect the student need/service composition of each school district is that this procedure creates an illusion of greater wealth in those districts with extensive special education services and vocational programs. The effect of this phenomenon is not dramatically evident in school districts with only limited special education and vocational services. However, for demographically 10 complex districts with extensive offerings and student needs, there is a significant shift in apparent local wealth. Gooden, at page 10. V. LOSS FUNDING AND DECLINING ENROLLMENT The state's decision to eliminate loss funding from the new funding system came about after the State was ordered by the District Court to recalculate the method by which it paid loss funding to LRSD and PCSSD and to reimburse them for the shortages. As Dr. Gooden has observed: The most adverse effect of this methodology will be experienced by districts losing student population. Whereas the earlier method averaged daily membership for a three-year period to allow a gradual adjustment in funding if enrollment declined, Act 917 provides for no gradual reduction in aid. The effective result will be a loss of an amount equal to the Base Local Revenue Per student immediately when student enrollment declines. School districts in portions of the state losing enrollment may not survive this dramatic loss. Gooden, at page 10. Dr. Gooden concludes at page 37 that the elimination of averaging annual ADM in district's losing enrollment prevents gradual funding reduction and that a solution may be to provide ADM averaging for districts losing enrollment, a matter that should be given priority consideration. Gooden, at page 38. In sharp contrast to the elimination of loss funding is the fact that a form of student growth funding is retained by Act 917. As Dr. Gooden explains: The current formula provides for an adjustment during the current school year when enrollment has increased. Act 917 continues this concept by providing for an adjustment in aid from a categorical set-aside when the student popultion increases above that of the prior 11 year. The amount of of funding equals approximately $3,000 per student. This factor will be beneficial to rapidly growing school districts. Gooden, at page 21. Upon information and belief, the only school districts in Arkansas that are experiencing rapidly growing enrollment are either overwhelmingly white or are all white. On the other hand, and upon further information and belief, a statistically significant number of the districts that are experiencing enrollment decline are majority black or have substantial black populations including the PCSSD. Thus, in combination, the elimination of loss funding coupled with the continuation of growth funding has a racially discriminatory effect and cannot be said to be either fair or rational or of \"general\" application when the disparate impacts are demonstrated. For instance, as previously pointed out, the Bryant School District will receive a bonus of funds in excess of its actual teacher retirement costs. The Intervenors' contend that the PCSSD enrollment decline should result in less state aid because: \"This condition is no different in Pulaski County than throughout Arkansas.\" This ignores the fact that the PCSSD loses students to the Bryant School District. By paying the Bryant School District a bonus while at the same time penalizing the PCSSD, the new funding scheme simply better positions the Bryant School District to continue to attract and host families which move from the PCSSD or which elect to locate initially in the Bryant School District even when they work in Pulaski County. 12 VI. THE NEW FORMULA OVERALL In his introduction, Dr. Gooden posits the following: Should an orderly formula distribution not address the varying needs of Arkansas' school districts; should the means of distributing revenues not be simple and clearly understood by educators and the public; and should the level of combined local and state funds be less than is required to meet the educational needs of Arkansas students, the formula must be found inadequate and less than acceptable. Gooden, at page 7. Dr. Gooden has also found that: Although Act 917 includes references to \"Student Classroom Teacher Funding, Student Unit Funding, and student Needs Funding,\" the subtle wording effectively precludes the allocation of any state aid for these categories in the foreseeable future. The threshold of equity funding (Student Equalization Funding) which must be achieved is so high as to make it doubtful that any of these categories will be funded in our lifetimes. They were obviously added to the formula to confuse and/or calm those who were attempting to understand its provisions. [Emphasis added.] Gooden, at page 11. Another feature of the new funding scheme which negatively impacts the PCSSD is explained by Dr. Gooden as follows: While Act 917 provides assistance in the payment of bonded indebtedness to districts by utilizing a wealth index and provides for a line item appropriation for this purpose, the act also allows millage rates dedicated to the retirement of debt to be calculated in such a way as to reduce the minimum required level of local support below the stated 25 mill minimum. This formula provision excludes from consideration that portion of the school millage required to make annual payments on bonded debt after applying state debt service supplement payments. This characteristic creates an illusion of less wealth for those districts who have chosen to incur significant bonded debt and have dedicated major portions of local millage for these purposes. 13 This status is in sharp contrast to those districts whose voters chose to dedicate a portion of total millage for capital outlay purposes. Act 917 attempts to categorize capital outlay millage along with maintenance and operation millage and attempts to treat revenues produced as equals. This is a clear misrepresentation of facility funding plans adopted by local voters consistent with applicable statutes authorizing capital outlay taxes. Capital outlay millages approved prior to 1995 are restricted by statute for certain purposes and are not the equivalent of maintenance and operation revenues. Gooden, at page 12. Increases in the charged local millage under the old system were to the benefit, not the detriment, of the PCSSD. VII. COMPENSATORY EDUCATION/SUMMER SCHOOL The PCSSD is also adversely impacted in these areas as explairied by Dr. Gooden: Funding for compensatory education/summer school programs for 1996/97 and thereafter is included in the state equalization funding, distributed on the basis of ADM to all school districts. This is a departure from the previous method of distributing funds which considered the at-risk student needs reflected by the Title I formula as well as student achievement in basic skills. Gooden, at page 16. The Settlement Agreement provides that the ADE shall monitor the districts' implementation of compensatory education programs. The Settlement Agreement further provides at page 13 that: If necessary as a last resort, ADE may petition the Court for modification or changes in such programs being implemented by the Districts (but not for a reduction in the agreed level of State funding). The State has not sought the permission of the District Court to reduce the level of compensatory education funding previously paid to the PCSSD, which reduction is prohibited by 14 the Agreement in any event. Rather, as part of the changes it has enacted, it has simply included these funds as part of the ADM driven formula and will disburse certain funds to the PCSSD without regard to its needs. This will result in a reduction in the amount of money the PCSSD receives for compensatory education for which the State has neither sought nor obtained Court approval. VIII. VOCATIONAL AID Vocational education is a component of the PCSSD Desegregation Plan. The impact of the new system is explained by Dr. Gooden as follows: Funding to support vocational programs in 1996-97 must be derived from state and local funds realized by school districts as Base Equalization Revenues. Unlike student-enrollment-based funding in the past, districts will receive the same amount of funding regardless of the number of vocational courses offered or the number of students enrolled in them. The previous system of providing state foundation funds relative to the weighted-pupil factors determined by the various vocational courses was repealed by Act 917. Gooden, at page 17. IX. MINIMUM SALARY LAW The new minimum salary requirements substantially interfere with the ability of the PCSSD to desegregate and the state provides no funds to fulfill this unfunded mandate. Dr. Gooden has observed that: In most cases, Act 917 expenditure requirements appear to be the result of a mathematically derived assumption regarding the level of expenditure which may be appropriate to support certain purportedly desired activities. Gooden, at page 25. 15 It is clear that the salary provisions contained in this act are based upon objectives other than the equitable distribution of school funds and appear to transcend reason in an attempt to restrict the ability of local school districts in managing revenues and expenditures. Gooden, at page 26. x. CONCLUSION Dr. Gooden has concluded that: The true measure of effectiveness in this funding formula revision will lie in analyzing the degree to which the tests of adequacy, equity, and efficiency are met. If all of these characteristics are not satisfied, the formula revisions contained in Act 917 are little more than an exercise in futility. Gooden, at page 7. The dramatic conceptual changes in the method of financing public education in Arkansas were enacted in haste and apparently without careful consideration of the three imperatives of educational finance: Adequacy, Equity, and Efficiency Act 917 of 1995 represents an exercise in cost-shifting and moves from a funding scheme based on needs to one which attempts to consider certain aspects of wealth without a balancing need--driven resource component. Gooden, at page 37. The cost shifting components of the new system violate the Settlement Agreement because these are programs for which the State provided funding in the past and for which the Intervenors acknowledge the State will provide no funding in the future. The State is obligated under the Settlement Agreement to provide funding to the PCSSD for these programs. The underlying basis of State aid, which simply distributes pro-rata based on numbers of 16 students, is not fair and rational, especially when applied to the PCSSD, because it ignores the substantially higher costs of the PCSSD in areas such as teacher retirement costs, special education, vocational education, and desegregation related expenditures. The defects identified in the new system as identified by Dr. Gooden are the reasons why the formula as a whole cannot satisfy the requirements of the Settlement Agreement. For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court should declare that the new State funding formula violates those provisions of the Settlement Agreement which require the State to continue funding the PCSSD for the programs described herein, that the changes wrought by the new system are neither fair, rational, nor of general application, that, at a minimum, the PCSSD programs should be funded at the percentage levels of the highest funded programs in other school districts in the state under the new system, for its costs and attorneys' fees and all other proper relief. Respectfully submitted: WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 200 West Capitol Avenue suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3699 (501) 371-0808 By __ .....,..'---',,---F\"\"'-'\"\"--------- M. I (76060) At laski County S ecial Sc oo District 17 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On August 1996, a copy of the foregoing was served by U.S. mail on the following persons of record:. Mr. John W. Walker John W. Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 2000 First Commercial Building Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Ms. Ann Brown ODM Heritage West Bldg., Ste. 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 William P. Thompson and James M. Llewellyn, Jr. Thompson \u0026 Llewellyn 412 South 18th Street P. o. Box 818 Fort Smith, Arkansas 72902-0818 18 Mr. Richard W. Roachell Roachell and Street First Federal Plaza 410 w. Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Timothy Gauger Assistant Attorney General 323 Center Street, Suite 200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Mr. Stephen W. Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 AR NSAS School Fun~ing _Plan __ ;;:~ .. ~ ... \":1..: 2.1 . :. ... l  l I I  EXHIBIT 4 Arkansas School Funding Plan An Analysis and Opinion by Benny L Gooden, Ed. D. Superintendent of Schools June 1996 1 tForl ~mith Public Schools \"Iii\\-_~,~, ~~~~~~F~ort~S~mith~,A~rka~nsas~ _  V V .J Foreword Dramatic chl111ges in Arkansas school finance resulting from the passage of Act 917 of 1995 have gencr:ued considerable discussion regarding the overall concept of the acL its impact upon school districts of all sizes, and its potential to solve or cx.accrbatc the financial challenges facing Arkansas educators. In an anempt to analyu: the plethora of components contained in the act and in the incerest of identifying potential problems and possible solutions, I have prepared this opinion paper regarding Act 917 and its impact upon Arkansas sdlools. While the :ictual effecu arc different for each of Arkansas' schools distticts, I have utilized data for the Fon Smith Public Schools to illusauc the immedia1e impact of Act 917 provisions. ll is imponant to note uw the impact upon an urban school district With a significant industrial w: base will be dramatically differcru than the impact upon rural school disuicL~ with an a~cullur~l or eitc::iusively residential taX base. I..ikcwise. the student demographics and district financial mucturc will affect tllc ultim:ite outcome. ~b school district must thoroughly analyze its own !iituation utilizing and interpreting the financial data provided by the Ark.in.sas Department of Education as well as other local daia. This position paper is intended only for infonnation purposes and will hopefully provoke discussion lo encourage improvements to the financing of schools in Arkansas for the benefit of :ill students. Benny L. Gooden I. II. Conceptual Chaages ,-------------------9 Need-Based vs. Equal Aid Equity Comp~ ADMvs. "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1650","title":"Court Filings: District Court, memorandum of the Joshua intervenors opposing the Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) motion to end federal court jurisdiction","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1996-08-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Joshua Intervenors","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School management and organization","School integration","School districts"],"dcterms_title":["Court Filings: District Court, memorandum of the Joshua intervenors opposing the Little Rock School District's (LRSD's) motion to end federal court jurisdiction"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1650"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["71 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.    {.- I .., 0 1 'C06  \\J - ' - .- IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO~t:~S 1,: '..:~CC F.HP..C!\\. CLERK EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS p 11. WESTERN DIVISION ~, ------;:c;,\"E'':?:''orcTi:_'~;: :.:::..:7\u003c: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. V. NO. LR-~-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL. . I~ i YO f ;-,,., Olt1ce of Desegregation Monitoring INTERVENORS  .... . ~ ---~---- ....~ ~\"'l' .. - i -~.. . -. ~-~ .... ..,,~ ....... ~  Memorandum of the Joshua Intervenors Oppos.thg the LRSD's Motion to End Federal Court Jurisdiction A. Introduction The LRSD seeks an order \"which withdraws federal court jurisdiction of this case and dismisses this case with prejudice.\" Motion, 5\\17\\96, at 2. This motion rests on a series of baseless assertions and otherwise unsound premises. It should, therefore, be denied. More specifically, LRSD first contends that the district agreed to implement the provisions of the settlements for only six years, absent a demonstration by the Joshua Intervenors of a failure of the system to comply with a term (or terms) of the settlement agreements. Motion, at 1; Memorandum, 5\\17\\96, at 1, 9, 16-17. Then, reasoning that \"[t]he Tri-District Plan was essentially the (settlement] Plans modified to address the constitutional infirmities identified by (Judge Woods], and that 1 constitutional infirmities identified by (Judge Woods], and that - \"LRSD implemented the Tri-District Plan during the 1990-91 school year,\" LRSD further contends that this six year period ended at the end of the 1995-96 school year. Motion, at 1; Mem., at 10-12. Lastly, LRSD argues that it has \"substantially (complied]\" with the settlement provisions. This assertion is based on what is termed an \"exhaustive audit of LRSD's desegregation obligations\" and a discussion of particular areas such as student enrollment and racial disparities in achievement. Motion, at 1; Mem., at 12- 13, 17-32. This memorandum addresses these and other premises of the LRSD submission. B. The Assertions About A Six-Year Plan The district asserts at page 9 of its memorandum that \"(u]nder the terms of the Settlement Agreement, LRSD agreed to implement the plans for six years. 111 The problem with this assertion is shown by the fact that there is no citation to any provision of the Settlement Agreement. Nor is there a citation in the memorandum, at any point, to a provision of any of the settlement documents limiting implementation to six years (absent noncompliance) . 2 1 LRSD refers to the \"Settlement Agreement\" of March 1989, as revised on September 28, 1989. See Mem., at 9. 2 The Settlement Agreement includes payment schedules and related criteria, applicable to LRSD, and covering various periods of time with various termination dates. These are (i) 1989-90 through 1998-99 (to LRSD) (at 15); (ii) 1990-91 through 1995-96 (to LRSD) (at 16); (iii) December 31, 2000 (period through which LRSD may show that composite test scores of bl_ack 2 I J LRSD asserts that at the hearing on May 13, 1996, this court - \"acknowledged that the Plans were to be implemented for a period of six years.\" Mem., at 14. This assertion, as shown by the transcript, is erroneous. Indeed, the court, after alluding to provisions referencing six years, welcomed motions to perfect the decree. 3 -  To be sure, the \"Interdistrict Desegregation Plan\" contains the following provision: \"There shall be a limited number of incentive schools, for a period of at least six years ... (at 3).\" However, this language appears in a paragraph titled \"III. Incentive Schools\" -- one of 19 separately numbered paragraphs, in an \"Overview,\" each paragraph having a separate title. Id., at 2-6. In brief, the six-year provision refers to the incentive schools; it is not set forth as a general limitation on the duration of the entire plan. Moreover, intervenors' argument is consistent with the treatment of the six-year period by the Court of Appeals in its 1990 opinion considering the overall settlement. With respect to the LRSD plan, the court alludes to what it terms \"the initial six-year period\" only with reference pupils are 90 percent or more of scores of white pupils) (at 17). 3 See Tr., 5\\13\\96, at 6-7 (\" .... The reason for this hearing is that we are now in the sixth year, depending on how you count it, of the settlement of this case. And there are several places in the Consent Decree that mentions six years, although there is nothing in the decree that says that after six years the Court shall review the settlement and its effectiveness. But I have chosen to do this. [) I've invited the parties to ask the Court to modify the decree in areas in which . the parties believe it's not working or cannot work .... \") 3 I  to the incentive schools. 4 Lastly, the court states with regard - to the case generally: \"This does not mean that a court must automatically approve anything the parties set before it. In the present case, for example, any remedy will necessarily require some judicial supervision -- monitoring, at least -- for a long time\" (emphasis added). Little Rock School District. supra, 921 F.2d at at 1383. LRSD's reliance on United States v. Overton, 834 F.2d 1171 (5th Cir. 1987) is unavailing. See Mem., at 14-15. There, as the opinion shows, the parties dealt explicitly with the duration of the overall decree, first by specifying a three-year period, absent objection, and then, in resolving objections, by specifying a set date, or, alternatively, the date of the completion of a construction project. Id., at 1173-74. Overton is thus distinguishable by reason of the differences in the terms of the settlement. The Court of Appeals' characterization in Overton of the alternative formulation as one which \"left the decree open until certain other conditions were met, which were\" (834 F.2d at 1174) is relevant here. This, we submit, parallels the situation in this case. The agreements deal with certain subject matter areas, such as student enrollment and disparitities in achievement; they set forth goals of the remedial process, such as targets for the racial make-up of various categories of schools and \"the 4 Little Rock School District v. Pulaski county Special School District, 921 F.2d 1371, 1386 (8th Cir. 1990) (emphasis added). 4 elimination of educational achievement disparities between black - and white students\"5 -- the \"certain conditions\" in Overton terms; and they describe manifold actions to be taken to achieve the goals. The focus here with regard to termination of jurisdiction is not on a particular date; it is on the adequate implementation of the agreed upon actions to attain the goals, including any revisions adopted by the court, 6 and the attainment of the goals (the \"certain conditions\") to the maximum extent practicable. 7 c. LRSD Has the Burden of Establishing Compliance with the Settlement Terms Turning to standards external to the settlements, LRSD contends that in the context of determining the duration of court 5 Interdistrict Desegregation Plan, at 4. 6 See Little Rock School District. supra, 921 F.2d at 1394 n. 8 and Order, July, 10, 1992 (adopting ODM recommendations). 7 The follow portion of the \"Introduction\" set forth in the Interdistrict Desegregation Plan (at 1) is relevant: \"The goals of school desegregation planning must be clearly focused and well understood. It is insufficient to establish as a single goal the physical movement of bodies and the rearrangement of boundary lines. An educational environment which encourages and provides academic and human growth for all students based upon their individual needs and talents must also be a goal of any adequate desegregation paln. (] The parties hereto seek to ensure that the schools and learning experiences throughout the school system are organized so that school practices, policies and procedures prevent unfair treatment or denial of opportunity for any child because of his or her racial, economic status or cultural identification. (] Immediately following this introduction, the parties have included an overview which sets forth the basic tenets and bases of compromise they consider essential to an interdistrict desegregation plan .... \"[The aforementioned \"Overview\" addressing 19 topics follows the Introduction.] 5 I  jurisdiction, the Joshua Intervenors have the burden of - establishing noncompliance with the settlement agreements. Mem., at 16-17. The district's reliance on Hazen v. Reagan, 16 F.3d 921, 925 (8th cir.1994) is unavailing. That case, and the earlier Eighth Circuit case on which it relies, address a special situation;~, a party seeks an adjudication that its adversary's performance is so deficient that it constitutes civil contempt. A far more appropriate approach to fill the void left by a gap in the agreements, and one consistent with the overall approach of the LRSD submission, 8 is to rely upon the standards normally applicable when this particular issue regarding burden arises in school desegregation litigation. This approach also finds support in the fact that the Court of Appeals described this court's responsibilities and authority in monitoring the agreements in traditional, and even expansive, terms.~, 921 F.2d at 1386, 1394 paras. 4, 8 (\"and otherwise to proceed as the law and the facts require\"), 9. The general rule is that a school district has the burden of establishing the predicate for the termination of court jurisdiction in one or more areas of the case. Freeman v. Pitts, 118 L.Ed.2d 108, 137 (1992);9 see also United States v. Fordice, 8 See Mem., at 17-32 (citing many federal court decisions addressing the duration of decrees in desegregation cases). 9 \"The school district bears the burden of showing that any current imbalance is not traceable, in a proximate way, to the prior violation.\" 6 I ,i ... 120 L.Ed.2d 575, 599 (1992) (higher education) . 10 More generally, - assignment of this burden to LRSD is consistent with the standards for allocation of the burden of proof set forth by the Supreme Court in Keyes v. School District No. 1, 413 U.S. 189, 208-10 (1973). In Keyes, a school desegregation case in which segregation had not been required or permitted by state law, the Court identified instances in which Denver school authorities had the burden of proof. For example, proof of intentionally segregative actions in a substantial part of the system was held to establish a prima facie case that actions having a segregative effect in other parts of the system were also motivated by race. See 413 U.S. at 208-09. 11 The Court explained the basis for this rule as follows: \"This burden-shifting principle is not new or novel. There are no hard-and-fast standards governing the allocation of the burden of proof in every situation. The issue, rather, 'is merely a question of policy and fairness based on experience in the different situations.' 9 J. Wigmore, Evidence S 2486, at 275 (3d Ed 1940).\" See 413 U.S. at 209. The court then cited a variety of situations in which considerations of \"policy and 10  \"Brown and its progeny, however, established that the burden of proof falls on the State, and not the aggrieved plaintiffs, to establish that it has dismantled its prior de jure segregated system. Brown II, 349 U.S. at 300 .... \" 11 \"In that circumstance, it is both fair and reasonable to require that the school authorities bear the burden of showing that their actions as to other segregated schools within the system were not also motivated by segregative intent.\" See 413 U.S. at 209. 7 I ' J fairness\" had been held to support a requirement that school - authorities explain actions or conditions. See 413 U.S. at 209- 10. Two considerations of \"policy and fairness\" warrant allocating to LRSD the burden of showing the requisite compliance with the terms of the settlement before the termination of the court's jurisdiction in one or more areas. First, the school district obviously has superior access to data and greater resources in terms of personnel. Second, both this court and ODM, the monitoring body which the Court of Appeals directed the court to establish, have repeatedly documented poor compliance by LRSD with the terms of the court-approved settlement. The court summarized its view in its Memorandum and Order of March 11, 1996. 12 See also Joshua's Enclosure One to this memorandum (containing the court's statement of March 1993, as well as other statements by the court regarding LRSD's poor compliance). ODM's documentation of ongoing poor compliance regarding the incentive schools -- where the Court of Appeals stressed the need for scrupulous compliance (921 F.2d at 1386) -- was recently summarized in the \"Motion of the Joshua Intervenors for Relief 12 \"The LRSD has frequently exhibited indifference or outright recalcitrance towards its commitments and has been slow to implement many aspects of its agreement (although some improvements have been made). Therefore, the Court finds that an order of dismissal should be deferred in order to ensure compliance with the plans and the agreement. Even had the LRSD acted in good faith throughout the years, the logistics and complexity of this case are such that this Court's monitoring function would be impaired by entering an order of dismissal at this time.\" At 8-9. 8 /  Concerning the Incentive Schools\" (May 31, 1996), at paras. 2- 4  13 In conclusion, LRSD should be required to demonstrate, in a meaningful manner, compliance with the court-approved settlement terms. D. LRSD Has Not Established that It Implemented the Settlement in 1990-91 LRSD's contention, tied to its \"six years argument,\" that it should be credited with implementing the settlement in 1990-91, should be rejected. 14 In the first place, the Court of Appeals did not direct approval of the settlement \"[i]n general\" and \"also make certain other directions for the future of the case\" (921 F.2d at 1376) until December 12, 1990, several months into the 1990-91 school year. Joshua Intervenors should be held to be - entitled to a period of implementation during which all of the officials and agents of the LRSD were aware that the settlements had been approved by the courts. More significantly, LRSD relies basically on simply asserting that it implemented the Tri-District Plan in 1990-91. Mem., at 11-12. LRSD does note that the earlier plan included \"six Incentive -Schools\" (Mem. at 11), and suggests, implicitly, that its \"implementation\" of the Plan included this feature. 13 The motion also relied on the Joshua Intervenors' own monitoring reports which were provided, upon their completion, to LRSD officials. 14 Given our contention that the \"six years argument\" is baseless, this section of our memorandum sets forth an alternative position. 9 I  . ... However, Judge Henry Woods noted in an order of December 11, 1989 that LRSD's noncompliance regarding \"virtually every educational component\" which would justify the existence of all-black schools touched the \"approved portions of (its] own plan for the proposed 'incentive Schools.' ... \" (at 16, footnote omitted); and, as we have shown, ODM and the Joshua intervenors thereafter documented ongoing deficient compliance regarding the incentive schools. Surely such a skimpy showing would not support loping a year from the six year period -- even if this period had the significance asserted by LRSD. E. LRSD Has Not Established the Requisite Implementation of the Court-Approved Settlement LRSD contends that its internal audit and the analysis which it sets forth in its memorandum regarding particular areas of its operation demonstrate that it has substantially and in good faith complied with its desegregation obligations. These assertions are groundless. Preliminarily, Joshua Intervenors reiterate their reliance upon the statements by the court rearding the case generally, and ODM and Joshua findings regarding the incentive schools, one pivotal element of the approved settlement. Moreover, Joshua intervenor's \"Motion ... for the Implementation of recommendations of the Office of Desegregation Monitoring\" (July 2, 1996) (at para. 7) identified scores of ODM recommendations predicated upon findings of LRSD's inadequate compliance in many areas. 10 / .I . ... (1.) The LRSD Audit The LRSD audit15 is unpersuasive for many reasons. First. The audit relies heavily on \"Primary Leaders\" identifying the status of the implementation of obligations within their respective domains. At 6. It is only common sense that too many negative answers would jeopardize a leader's tenure in his\\her position. Second. The audit relies on making a dot with a pencil on an \"obligations scan sheet\" (at 6) -- a technique not suitable for addressing more complex obligations, or obligations affecting multiple schools. Third. The description of the asserted steps to move beyond the \"scan sheets\" (at 11) is far too sketchy to permit an assessment of its reliability. Were the \"committees\" composed of \"primary leaders\" called upon to scratch each others' backs -- so to speak? There are no more detailed descriptions of how this process worked regarding some significant obligations, showing how much time was taken, by whom, what evidence was reviewed, etc. Fourth. The audit does not deal in depth with significant areas of the case by advancing evaluations conducted in a professionally sound manner, or affidavits. These areas could have been identified by reference to Court of Appeals' 15 See \"Little Rock School District Position Paper on Desegregation Obligations,\" May a, 1996, Exhibit 4 to the memorandum. 11 I J  opinions, 16 ODM reports pointing out compliance problems in - particular areas, or the court's statement about poor compliance in March 1993. How can the audit be viewed as significant, if it does not reflect the LRSD's coming to grips with the many findings of noncompliance by the court's monitoring body, and attempting to document a basis for favoring LRSD's conclusions. Fifth. The audit does not discuss comprehensively the \"Not Begun\" category (at 14), to explain, for example, how its existence is consistent with the request that the court's jurisdiction be terminated in its entirety. Motion, at 2. In the end it must be said that the audit provides little to help decide in a reliable manner whether LRSD representatives \"scrupulously and dilgently carry out the settlement plans and the settlement agreement (as relevant to LRSD) .... 11 Little Rock School District. supra, 921 F.2d at 1394. (2.) The Particular Areas of the System's Operation The district elects to discusss for many pages \"how LRSD compares to school districts [which) have already achieved unitary status or to the nation as a whole.\" Mem., at 17. There are at least two problems with this approach. LRSD is silent about the extent to which any of these systems were by court order or voluntary agreement subject to the full panoply of provisions to which the LRSD is subject. Secondly, LRSD cites a sentence from Freeman v. Pitts. supra, 118 L.Ed.2d at 124, 16 See Little Rock School District, 921 F.2d at 1386 (programs in the incentive schools); Appeal of Little Rock School District. 949 F.2d 253, 256 (8th Cir. 1991} (seven areas). 12 I j . .... regarding \"a critical beginning point .... \" Mem., at 17. However, - LRSD should also have cited the preceding sentence, which reads as follows: \"Proper resolution of any desegregation case turns on a careful assessment of ITS facts. Green. supra, 391 U.S. at 439 .... \" Freeman, supra, 118 L.Ed.2d at 124 (emphasis added). The point is that in assessing whether a system has \"eliminated [the vestiges of past discrimination) to the extent practicable\", 17 the focus is on what is practicable in view of the facts in that school district. Under the standards which Little Rock cites, the system is not entitled to be excused on the issue of student enrollment because fewer of its schools are outside the applicable guidelines for measuring compliance than was the case in Savannah, Georgia if it is feasible in Little Rock to achieve compliance as to all (or additional) schools, or meaningful implementation of plan provisions designed to achieve compliance has not been attempted. (a.) Student Assignments LRSD devotes seven pages to this topic without identifying the schools in the district which are outside the applicable guidelines, or discussing other opportunities to enhance desegregation. Mem., at 17-24. It does not identify any plan provisions applicable to such schools or discusss the degree of their implementation. In short, LRSD does not show that it has achieved as much as can practicably be achieved. 17 Freeman v. Pitts, supra, 118 L.E.2d at 139, quoting Board of Education of Oklahoma City v.Dowell, 498 u.s. 237, 249-50 (1991). I j I 13 LRSD notes that it \"has successfully recruited white - students and desegregated Rockefeller Incentive School.\" Mem., at 24. It ignores, however, the fact that the exhibit cited with reference to Rockefeller (Exhibit 5), shows that the other four incentive schools had the following proportions of black students in 1995-96: Franklin (93%), Garland (92%), Mitchell (97%), Rightsell (96%). Our motion of May 31, 1996 concerning the incentive schools supported, by reference to deficiencies in implementation documented by ODM, the view that this segregation was \"an entirely predictable result given the overall deficient implementation of the plan and the nature of the deficiencies \" See Joshua motion, at paras. (3.), (4.) (a.) through (f.), (o.). The district does not discuss whether efforts have been made to promote desegregative transfers from the area elementary schools with the highest proportions of black students to the area schools with the highest proportions of white pupils. Given the current state of implementation of provisions regarding the incentive schools, an area where the Court of Appeals noted expressly the need for strict compliance with the agreements, LRSD is not entitled to entry of the order sought regarding student enrollment, whatever the number of indices it cites. (b.) Faculty and Staff As with other areas, the district's presentation does not confront ODM's findings regarding racial make-up and other staffing issues in LRSD. This is not consistent with the model 14 I .I for monitoring identified by the Court of Appeals in 1990. In its report of September 15, 1995 addressing the issue of the composition of teaching staffs at the elementarylevel in the three systems , ODM's recommendations included the following provision (at 11): 4. The districts should examine the distribution of black and white teachers in each grade level category in order to improve student access to classroom teachers of both races. As we have noted in this report, staff racial balance is not simply a matter of the total number of black certified employees in a building. The idea of racial balance must also encompass the distribution of those individuals within that building. The staffing of classrooms at each grade level category should reflect a conscious effort to furnish students with the greatest possible probability of experiencing teachers of both races throughout their school years. This recommendation rested, in turn, on ODM findings that there were (at 10): few black teachers at the early childhood level in all three districts. The distribution of black teachers across grade levels at some individual schools caused concern. Some schools lacked a significant number of black teachers to provide most students opportunities to have them as classroom teachers. While other schools had a larger number of black teachers, most were usually concentrated at the intermediate level. This pattern of racial representation can preclude large numbers of students from access to a black classroom teacher for a number of years. Regarding LRSD, ODM noted that the teaching corps included the following proportions of black faculty by level in 1994-95: early childhood (27%), primary (33%), and intermediate (44%). At 31. ODM also raised issues regarding particular Little Rock 15 I  schools. 18 The ODM report of May 10, 1996 detailed serious problems of staff turnover, both faculty and principals, at the incentive schools, a focal point of both the remedies and the courts. See ODM report, at 6-10. For example, of the 87 classroom teachers at the schools in 1995-96, 27 (31%) were new to these schools, although only five new classes had been added. At 6. ODM also questioned the assigning of five first-time principals to the incentive schools since 1990-91. At 9-10. ODM noted that the level of instability identified can not be squared with the governing standards. At 6. 19 Again, LRSD is silent on these issues raised by ODM. Also, 18 For example: Badgett (sharp disparity in the make-up of the staff at the different levels); Baseline (sharp disparity in the make-up of the staff at the primary and intermediate levels); Carver (same); Chicot (no black teacher at early childhood level for three years); Forest Park (same); Franklin (early childhood and primary levels are heavily white, and intermediate level identifiably black; \"staff remains predominantly white\"); Jefferson (no black teacher at early childhood level for three years); McDermott (\"staff remained predominantly white\"); Meadowcliff (no black teacher at the early childhood level for three years; black teachers concentrated at the intermediate level; \"staff remains predominantly white\"); Pulaski Heights (no black teacher at early childhood level for three years; sharp disparity in composition of teachers at the three levels); Rightsell (\"the staff has remained predominantly black\"); Rockefeller (decreasing number of black teachers over three year period; only 3 of 27 teachers were black persons in 1994-95); Terry (\"staff remained predominantly white\"); and Watson (no black teacher at early childhood level for three years; \"staff has remained predominantly white\"). 19 See also Morgan v. Kerrigan, 509 F.2d 580, 598 (1st Cir. 1974), cert den., 421 U.S. 963 (1975) (noting \"a rate of faculty turnover at predominantly black schools far higher than than that at white schools\" contributing to a denial of equal educational opportunity). 16 I  while LRSD touts its inclusion of black persons in the governance of the system, It does not address the fact that seven of the eight elementary schools west of University Avenue have white principals. 20 We respectfully submit that it is these matters, and not the situation in Dallas, etc., which LRSD must address in this context. (c.) Racial Differences in Student Achievement The LRSD made an unambiguous commitment -- in 1989 and at later times, not 1954 (compare Mem., at 27) -- to eliminate the \"achievement disparity between black and white students on normreferenced and criterion-referenced tests. 1121 The superficial presentation made by LRSD on this \"crucial\" aspect of the settlement22 does not approach the showing required to warrant the termination of the court's jurisdiction. See Mem., at 27- - 29. 23 20 These schools are Fulbright, Jefferson, McDermott, otter Creek, Romine, Terry, and Williams. Brady does have an African American principal. Addressing such patterns is an important part of the task of eliminating forever the notion of a \"disfavored race.\" Freeman. supra, 118 L.Ed.2d at 131. 21 See LRSD Desegregation Plan, April 29, 1992, at 1., para. B.; Interdistrict Desegregation Plan, April 29, 1992, at 4 (Part XII). 22 See Appeal of Little Rock School District, supra, 949 F.2d at 256 (Court of Appeals identifies \"the agreed effort to eliminate achievement disparity between the races\" as one of the \"crucial\" elements of the settlement as to which \"no retreat should be approved\").; Order, May 1, 1992, at 6 (\"However, certain modifications the Court finds substantive and unsupported in light of two of the primary goals of the case, i.e., racial integration and student achievement.\") 23 Assuming arguendo that there is room for lower courts to take a different view on the impact of desegregation than Brown, 17 I J Consider a hypothetical school district seeking the - termination of court jurisdiction over the issue of student enrollment despite the fact that it has not achieved the goals of its plan, and in the face of monitoring reports showing that it has neither complied with provisions of its plan, nor exhausted the posibility of modifications to better attain its objectives. It is obvious that this district's actions would not warrant a holding either that it had achieved maximum practicable desegregation, 24 or substantially complied with governing standards. LRSD's position on this issue is no better. The following are among the many factors\\reasons further showing that LRSD's effort to end jurisdiction on this point must fail. First. The district's presentation is entirely devoid of a proposition which we doubt, particularly in this case, this record does not support the broad contentions advanced by LRSD. First. Doctors Walberg and Armor acknowledged that 52 social scientists had joined a statement filed with the Supreme Court, taking a more positive position, than the one taken by them, on the impact of degregation on achievement. See Tr. , , May 13, May 15, 1996. Second. Dr. Walberg agreed that he has~times expressed his view of the impact of desegregation on achievement as follows: sometimes it helps, and sometimes it hurts, and sometimes it doesn't do anything. Tr. , May 13, 1996. He has not studied whether these differences are due to differences in the quality of the implementation in the different instances. Id. Third. Dr. Orfield testified that Dr. Walberg has done no original research on the impact of desegregation, and that Dr. Armor has done little such research. Tr. , May 30, 1996. Dr. Orfield also testified about scholars who take a positive position regarding the impact of desegregation, including with regard to its role in providing a path into the mainstream of society. Id. 24 See Swann v. Charlotte Meklenburg Board of Educ., 402 u.s. 1, 26 (1971); Davis v. Board of School commissioners of Mobile County. 402 U.S. 33, 37 (1971). 18 I J  facts, except for Exhibit 12, which is not cited in the - memorandum, and undermines one of the system's principal arguments. See discussion, infra. There is, for example, no data on racial disparities in achievement in 1990-91 and 1995-96, allowing some conclusion as to the relative size of the gap \"then and now.\" There is no indication of any effort to determine whether some schools show greater progress in addressing the gap; or whether any such schools have been studied in depth to identify positive elements of their programs which could be replicated in other schools. There is no discussion of any effort to determine the impact of participation in early childhood programs. There is no evidence of any study to identify the specific areas of knowledge and skills which lead to the gap and the causes of these differences. There is no evidence of any effort to organize regular classroom instruction; extended day, week and year programs; or tutoring efforts to address the specifics of the achievement gap. There is no indication of any effort to comply with the promise regarding criterion referenced assessment. 25 25 Such an effort could include: identification of a body of knowlege and skills which this district desires that all students master, an effort to insure that all students are exposed to instruction allowing them the opportunity to master this material, and assessment, of various forms, determining students' mastery of this material. This differs from norm-referenced testing where a student's score is compared to the scores of the sample of students from throughout the country who were tested during the process of standardizing a test used throughout the nation. See also the testimony of Dr. Gary Orfield, Tr. , May 30, 1996 (need for broader forms of assessment; need for-longitudinal data following students over a period of years)~ 19 I  Second. In its Order of May 1, 1992 addressing the parties' - proposed amendments to the initial versions of the settlement, this court repeatedly considered the potential impact of actions with regard to improvement in the relative performances of black youth and reduction in the achievement gap. Order, at 10, 15, 16, 21-22, 23, 24, 30. The district ignores entirely this obvious starting point. Third. In Freeman. supra, cited by LRSD, the Supreme Court noted the f "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_601","title":"Program planning and budgeting process","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1996-08"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","School management and organization"],"dcterms_title":["Program planning and budgeting process"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/601"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nAUG 3 0 1996 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 Office of Desegregation I I PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING PROCESS H August 1996 M H ^5 Little Rock School District PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING August 1996 to General Concept A comprehensive program planning and budgeting process (Process) improves the Districts ability to allocate its revenue rationally and, therefore, have maximum impact on achieving the goals of the District. Linking program objectives and program expenditures assures that money is being spent appropriately. This document serves as an explanation of the Little Rock School Districts (LRSD) program planning and budgeting process. During the Process, the following will occur: q 1. The needs of the District, particularly legal obligations under the desegregation and settlement plans, will be determined. 2. Goals and objectives will be defined. 3. Programs to achieve those objectives, particularly those required by the desegregation plans, will be defined. 4. Performance standards and expenditures will be established and measured. q 5. Information for corrective decision-making will be prepared. q Organizational Structure for Planning and Budgeting Process q q q q q q q I. II. Key Players - The Superintendent leads the Process with direct support from the Cabinet. The Board is the ultimate decision-maker for the Process. Description - The Process is led by the Superintendent with direct support from the Superintendents Cabinet. The Process is coordinated by the Director of Planning, Research, and Evaluation (PRE) and the Manager for Support Services, who both serve on the Superintendents Cabinet. A. B. c. A Management Tool (described later in this document) serves as a Planning Budget Calendar. The Calendar allows the Board to continuously monitor progress of the Process. The Director of PRE is the lead planning person. He/she ensures that the planning process is conducted according to established time frames, provides technical assistance, coordinates the planning process, collects appropriate reports, coordinates the preparation of related documents, and advises the Superintendent and Board on the Process. In addition, the lead planning person is responsible for ensuring that all requirements from the desegregation plans and court orders are integrated into the Process. The Director of PRE is to be assisted by a Planning, Research, and Evaluation Specialist whose major responsibility is District wide planning. III. Outcome - An organizational chart that displays the current lines of authority and responsibility is attached (see Attachment 1). The primary planning and budget qLRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 2 IV. development tasks are finalized and included on a Project Management Tool by July (for the July Court submission). Time frame - The organizational chart is reviewed/revised by August to ensure that the configuration is the most effective and efficient arrangement. Necessary revisions and adjustments are made as needed. 4 Program Inventory Prior to the Needs Assessment period, which starts in September for the next budget year, the Program Inventory process begins in July\ncurrent desegregation and non-desegregation programs are identified. I. HI II. III. IV. Key Players - The Superintendent provides overall direction, and the Board reviews the findings. The lead planning person coordinates the collection of basic data and prepares the data into appropriate documents for use in goal setting and program modification and/or development. The Cabinet and staff collect the necessary data. Description - The list of current programs and services is revised if necessary. New programs and services are identified and merged with the Program Budget Document as necessary. Likewise, programs that are no longer in place or that have met legal obligations are removed from the Program Budget Document. The desegregation plan and court orders are reviewed to ensure all obligations related to compliance are operative. Primary and secondary responsible persons are identified for each program or service. Outcome - A Program Inventory Report is generated and used during the goals and objectives development process\nthe program addition, modification, and deletion-process\nand the budgeting process. Time frame - The Program Inventory process begins in July. A list of all desegregation and non-desegregation programs is compiled by August. The Program Inventory may be revised as needed. q q q q q q Program Evaluation Program evaluation provides an assessment of performance for decision-making purposes. q I. Key Players - The Board and Superintendent with assistance from the Cabinet, as recipients of the extended evaluations, use the information from the evaluation of programs q to guide programmatic direction and resource allocation. The lead planning person q II. q coordinates the program evaluation process. The Manager for Support Services provides assistance with supporting financial information. The Cabinet and staff prepare all reporting documents falling within their areas of responsibility. Description - Each program is evaluated through the Districts regular program evaluation component. As programs are developed and implemented, they contain program objectives and evaluation criteria. Special evaluations may be directed by the Superintendent. q Programs may also be identified for fast-track evaluation on an as needed basis if they have high impact on the goals and direction of the District. qLRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 3 III. IV. Outcome - Program evaluation information enables the District to make programmatic decisions in the areas of program modifications, additions, and deletions and resource allocation, which are the result of careful planning and thoughtful analysis. Time frame - The program evaluation period for each budget year begins in July and continues through mid-November, leading up to the point of program development (i.e.. Business Cases). Program evaluations are conducted on programs that were operating during the most recently completed school year. Needs Assessment q The needs assessment is a process for comparing the current situation with the desired conditions. I. I Key Players - The Superintendent provides leadership and direction for the Needs Assessment process. The lead planning person coordinates the process. The Superintendent and the Cabinet identify the needs. directina the staff in the collection of assessment information. The Superintendents Cabinet is responsible for II. I Description - Utilizing a combination of district wide perceptual and objective instruments, data are collected and analyzed to determine the needs of the students, parents, teachers, and administrators. Perceptual information is collected through broad-based input sessions such as Town Hall meetings and District Dialogue sessions. A. B. I c. q q q q At least three Town Hall meetings are conducted. One town hall meeting each for area schools, magnet schools, and incentive schools are scheduled. Every effort is made to locate strategically the sessions to encourage maximum participation. Additional Town Hall meetings may be scheduled if needed. One District Dialogue is conducted with principals, teachers, classified staff, and central office administrators. Additional District Dialogues may be scheduled if needed. An administrative work session is conducted to review and analyze various District wide reports and objective data. The following kinds of data are reviewed: 1. 2. J. 4. 5. 6. 1. 8. Stanford Achievement Test Results Planning, Research, and Evaluation Monitoring Reports Desegregation Monitoring Reports Audit from the Office of Desegregation Monitoring Court Orders Audit School Climate/Human Relations Survey Results District wide Facilities Study/Report Proportional Allocation Formulas Study Program Inventoiy q q J lLRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 4 D. A comparison between identified needs and the Program Inventory is conducted to determine whether or not programmatic gaps and areas of need exist. III. Outcome - The outcome of the administrative work session, town hall meetings, and district dialogue sessions is a list of needs. District desegregation and non-desegregation programs are also evaluated for needs information. The Superintendent and Cabinet identify program(s) in need of an extended evaluation. HI V IV. Time frame - The Needs Assessment process begins in September with a review of the types of data that will be collected. A Needs Assessment report is generated by the end of November based upon findings from the Town Hall Meetings, District Dialogues, studies or reports, and the results of program evaluations. Broad-Based Feedback Broad-based feedback is designed to provide feedback to the various groups who participated in town hall meetings and district dialogues (as a counterpart to the Needs Assessment process). Every effort is made to include other interested groups, if appropriate. HI 1. Key Players - The Board and the Superintendent will provide direction for broad-based feedback. The Director of Communications, with assistance from the lead planning person, I UI will develop a plan for disseminating information. II. Description - Broad-based feedback sessions are designed to provide planning and budgeting process information to the community and LRSD employees. Target populations are the same as those at the broad-based input sessions conducted in September and October. III. Outcome - Positive community support in recognition of the thoroughly planned budgeting process may be generated. IV. Time frame - Broad-based feedback sessions will be conducted the following March and April. Planning and Budget Goals The goal setting process guides all actions of the administration, expected outcomes for a specified period of time. The process defines the m I. Key Players - The Board and Superintendent provide leadership for identifying the mission and goals of the district. The Cabinet provides assistance and support by defining m II. objectives for programs which will satisfy the accepted goals. The goal setting process is coordinated by the lead planning person. Description - The Board conducts a work session. After reviewing the Needs Assessment Report and the Program Inventory' Report, the Board: A. B. Reviews and revises, if necessaiy', the mission statement. Establishes written goals/objectives. The goals and objectives define what the district expects to realistically accomplish for the next fiscal year. Goals and objectives that conflict with the desegregation plan are not adopted. II HLRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 5 n q q q q q q q q q C. D. E. Reviews and provides guidance related to proportional allocation formulas (materials and supplies, staffing, etc.). Establishes written priorities. These priorities guide staff in program modification, addition, or deletion, as well as help allocate funding and resources during the budgeting process. Considers strategies for funding shortfalls. The Cabinet works to ensure that program goals and evaluation criteria are linked to the established goals. in. Outcome - At the conclusion of the Board Work Session, the Board publishes: A. A written mission statement B. c. Written goals A list of priorities IV. The staff revises program objectives and evaluation criteria as needed for each program, and these are incorporated into the Program Budget Document. Time frame - The goal setting process is dependent on the Needs Assessment and Program Inventory. The Board Work Session is conducted in mid-December. Program objectives and evaluation criteria are subsequently revised as needed by appropriate staff. Program Development If a service or program does not exist to support the needs of the District, it may be necessary to develop a program or modify an existing program. Any additions, modifications, or deletions are supported by a business case (see Attachment 2) as outlined in II, A below. I. Key Players - The Superintendent will provide leadership and guidance to ensure that goals are achieved by offering the best possible programs. The Cabinet will provide direction to staff in developing, modifyin\nIS. and implementing effective and efficient programs. The lead II. planning person will monitor and advise the Superintendent throughout the program modification and development phase. Description - Programs may need to be developed to address newly identified needs or fill gaps. Current programs may be modified to meet objectives. Some programs may be eliminated. The District establishes a framework for Program Development, framework includes, where appropriate, the following: The A. Business Case q 1. 2, q Executive Summary Background Problem Definition 4. Analysis of Alternatives q qLRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 6 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Recommended Alternative Objective Impact Analysis Resource Analysis Force Field Analysis General Implementation Plan B. I Appropriate changes to a Program Budget Document (see Planning Document in the Budgeting section) will be made as a result of program additions, modifications, or deletions. III. I ll IV. I V. Program Development - (i.e., program additions, modifications, or deletions) is conducted by staff with the appropriate Cabinet level official providing oversight to ensure that all tasks are completed in a timely manner. The Superintendent and the Cabinet review Program Development cases to ensure that commitments in the desegregation plan are not hindered by such Program Development. Outcome - A business case for each program that is added, modified, or deleted is written. As with existing programs, programs that are added or modified to satisfy a need include all of the elements for budget development and may be directly placed into the Program Budget Document. Time frame - The Program Development phase begins in November and concludes in February. However, some programs may be identified or recommended for possible addition, modification, or deletion al an earlier or later date (or as part of an ongoing process, if appropriate). q q q Budgeting I. q q q II. Key Players - The Board is the ultimate decision-making authority on the budget. However, the Superintendent ensures that a balanced budget is developed that meets the needs and goals of the school district. The Manager for Support Services coordinates the budget preparation process, and the lead planning person ensures that the planning and budgeting components are linked appropriately. Budget managers provide input relative to his or her area of responsibility. The Manager for Support Services will produce the budget information. Description - Funds, personnel, and facilities are allocated based on the goals and objectives of the district. Directions for budget preparation are issued by the q III. Superintendent with assistance provided by the Manager for Support Services. These directions include the identification of all proportional formulas and exceptions. Outcome - A budget document is developed that satisfies traditional budgeting and accounting requirements with a program planning and budgeting component that links the program and budget allocations. Funding of desegregation requirements is a priority. q IV. Time frame - qLRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 7 I Month Task 1 I November December January Februarv March May July August Issue instructions for budget preparation at all levels Budget managers begin to submit requests for next school year Begin budget development Continue budget development__________________________ Revise financial forecast\nPrepare Proposed Budget Prepare Tentative Budget Prepare Final Budget Board review and adoption of Budget\nSubmit budget to ADE Guidelines for Proposed. Tentative, and Final Budget Development I I The following guidelines help define the format and expectations, to the extent possible, of what is included in the Proposed, Tentative, and Final Budgets. I. Proposed Budget I I A. B. C. I D. The Proposed Budget should be at the detailed level. The Proposed Budget should reflect a revised budget for the current fiscal year. The Proposed Budget should reflect, at the detail level, all additions, modifications, deletions, and shortfall strategies that have been approved to date. The Proposed Budget should reflect, in a separate listing, all additions, modifications, deletions, and shortfall strategies that are under consideration and should show the budget impact at the function and object level. IL ll Tentative Budget A. B. C. D. The format of the Tentative Budget should be similar to the Proposed Budget but may be modified at a later date, if necessary. The Tentative Budget should be at the detailed level. The Tentative Budget should build upon the Proposed Budget. The Tentative Budget should reflect, at the detail level, all additions, modifications, deletions, and shortfall strategies that have been approved to date. The additions, modifications, deletions, and shortfall strategies should be clearly identified. (Most items should be included at the detail level by this stage.) n i q 4LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING E. Page 8 The Tentative Budget should reflect, in a separate listing, all additions, modifications, deletions, and shortfall strategies that are under consideration, clearly showing the budget impact at the function and object level. I I V III. Final Budget A. B. C. D. The format of the Final Budget should be similar to that of the Proposed Budget but may be modified at a later date, if necessary. The Final Budget should be at the detailed level. The Final Budget should reflect, at the detail level, all additions, modifications, deletions, and shortfall strategies that the District intends to make during the fiscal year. These additions, modifications, deletions, and shortfall strategies should be clearly identified. The Final Budget should reflect what the District intends to deliver to the State Department of Education. Monitoring Reporting The Program Budget Document provides the means for monitoring program performance and expenditures throughout the fiscal year. I. II. III. Key Players - The Superintendent provides guidance for the maintenance of the Program Budget Document. Program Managers provide program information for their respective areas. The Manager for Support Services provides financial information for each program. The lead planning person coordinates the updating of the document. The Board and I Superintendent are the recipients of the reports to assist them in oversight and decision-making. The lead planning person coordinates the process and prepares the O' 4 4 4 Program Budget Document. Program Managers prepare all reporting documents within their areas of responsibility. Description - The Program Budget Document is the basis for monitoring and reporting and follows an established format and design. The Program Inventory provides the divisions within the Program Budget Document. Program managers, as primary leaders, are assigned responsibility for identified programs. Secondary leaders are assigned also. Program managers are responsible for accomplishing program objectives, for coordinating the required activities or strategies, and for the preparation and submission of the Program Budget Document. The document reflects both program performance and expenditures quarterly. Programs with poor performance or expenditure problems may be addressed by corrective action during the year rather than after the year is completed. Outcome - A Program Budget Document is maintained that becomes the basis for monitoring and reporting and also serves as a guide for interim decision-making. The result is a quarterly composite progress report on identified programs within the District, supported with expenditure information. 4LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 9 IV. Time frame - Reports are generated quarterly beginning with the first quarter of the fiscal year. Reassessment of Process and Organization HI q Planning and budgeting is a continuing process (see Attachment 3, Planning and Budgeting Cycle). As such, the Program Inventory' begins in July, while the Needs Assessment begins in September. A review/revision of the Program Inventory for the future budget year is completed by August. The Reassessment of Process and Organization begins in July of the current year and concludes by August of the following year. The review process requires an examination of the Process for possible changes that prove beneficial to the Districts Program Planning and Budgeting Process. The reassessment requires a review of the Districts organizational structure to ensure that it is of the best configuration to meet the Districts needs. The lead planning person reviews the process and makes recommendations for changes to the Superintendent, when appropriate. The lead planning person ensures that the planning process is implemented as designed and coordinates the activities. q q Management Tool The Management Tool is submitted to the Court by the end of each calendar month. The q q q q Management Tool serves as an instrument by which the District may monitor established timelines which are cardinal to the Planning and Budgeting Process. The Management Tool identifies the responsible person(s), activities, and timelines required ofand also serves asa Planning Budget Calendar. The Management Tool, in addition to the Program Budget Document, is an outgrowth of the concepts described throughout this document. Further, items of significant importance to the District, but not necessarily directly linked to Program Planning and Budgeting, may be added to the tool, at the direction of the Superintendent, to allow the District to monitor additional issues or topics. The Management Tool is numbered to coincide with the Fiscal Year budget for which it is associated. The eight major components of the Management Tool include the following: 1) Program Inventory\n2) Program Evaluation\n3) Needs Assessment\n4) Planning and Budget Goals\n5) Program Development\n6) Budgeting\n7) Monitoring and Reporting\nand 8) Reassessment of Planning Process and Organization. q q q q Summary One of the primary goals of the long-range planning and budget process is to instill in the minds of the patrons and others interested in the affairs of the District a sense of fiscal responsibility, accountability and internal program evaluation by the District. Such tools as the Program Inventory, Needs Assessment, and quarterly reporting serve not only to strengthen the process, as outlined in the monthly calendar of critical events, but also to increase the communitys awareness of the Desegregation Plan, the commitments it contains and the Districts carefully thought-out process designed to meet those commitments. With commitment comes the responsibility of providing funds and ensuring that the funding levels are sufficient to support those programs that are determined by the planning and evaluation process to be effective toward achieving the desired goals. Increased use and refinement of the Districts Position Control Inventory System q q inQLRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 10 software yields valuable data for program evaluation and budget decision making. Quarterly monitoring reports, by way of the Program Budget Document, are provided. This process, plus the program linkages serve as the basis for future funding decisions by the Board and the administration. The intent of these steps and procedures is to identify those programs which can either be modified or eliminated, thereby serving to demonstrate the level of fiscal responsibility needed to garner community support for future requests for fundin\nFurther, by achieving a 'o- greater staffing efficiency, reducing over-use of materials and supplies (i.e., through proportional allocations, etc.) and by directing the Districts resources toward those programs which demonstrate track records of success, the District will be able to reduce or eliminate its reliance q on non-recurring revenue sources. Accordingly, the long-range planning and budget process is the key component of the Districts strategy to address anticipated funding shortfalls. q q q q q q q q q q q q qq LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 11 q q ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1: Organizational Chart q Attachment 2: Business Case Format q Attachment 3: Schematic Planning and Budget Cycle q q q q q q q q * 1 q q q q q2  s s  B JI Ji fi S f a 5\" a 'a 5 cn O Little Rock School District Organizational Structure [ -0 o a Board of Diraclora ] E Or Don Roberts IrMoran Si4\u0026gt;ennlar\u0026gt;denl r \u0026gt; Leon Modesle Spacial Assislani to Superintendeni I I X I o IBA Assoc Supi Brady Gadberry Labor Relations TBA Manager for Support Services 1 TBA Asst. Supi Curriculum Support Leon Adams Federal Programs/ Granta * Margaral GramiHion Aaal SupI Elamanlary Sadie Milchelt Asam Superntartdanl Elementary Dr Victor Anderson Aaaid Superkitendeni Secondary O aa Suelien Vann Communications Director Dr Richard Hurley Human Resources Director Mark Milhollen Finanoal Servicas Gena Parker Reading/Foreign Ads Dr Lmda Walsort Acting Aast Supi Sludenl Hearing Principals 13 Schools Prmapali 17 Schools Principals 13 Schools n' Nancy Acre Student Assignment Director Or Pally Kohler Di of Exceptionai Children Director Charlia Naai Proouramanl Dannia Glasgow Sciance/Mathematica SuperviBor Lmda Young New Futures David Beason Information Services Principals S Incentive Schools Carol Green Vocational Education S Bechy Rather Parent I\u0026lt;ecru\u0026lt;er Coordinaior Jo Evelyn Elston PupiJ Services Director Doug Eaton Plant Services Mane A McNeal Social Studies Supervisor Paulelle Mailin Aduli Educiiliun n -J CO c o o n Ur Ed Jackson Planning Research \u0026amp; Ev-ikialton Diiectof Bobby Jonei Bacurity/Ritk Managemertl Catherine Gill Parent involvement Coordinator Johnny Neeley Alleiiialive (eaiiiing Conlei Marvin Schwartz Grama VAiler Mary Jane Cheatham Director of Transportalion Starling Ingram Staff De\u0026lt;Mlopmanl Director Ray G'lluspie Athletics Oebbia Milam Vokrnleart m Public Schools Morlin McCoy Food Services Director Pal Price Early Childhood Coordinator X 1 o n \u0026gt; \u0026gt; \u0026gt; n o Lucy Lyon Technology/Media Services Coordinator Manan Shead-Jackaon HIPPY SuperviBor -0 cr rsLRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 13 STCASE02 REVISED 21 APR 93 ATTACHMENT 2 1. SHORT TERM PROJECT - BUSINESS CASE GLftDELlNES AND FORMAT FOR BUSINESS CASE n 4 m n I. BACKGROUND A business case is a written presentation which identifies and describes the main features supporting the decision-making process on an issue facing the organization. The purpose is to put forth in a logical order all the facts surrounding the situation, all the steps in the decision process, impact of the decision, and a general implementation plan for the decision. In addition to being called a business case, this type of document is sometimes referred to as an issue paper, a staff paper, a decision analysis, and a program analysis. While each of these types of presentations may vary slightly in content, the purpose remains essentially the same . . . decision support. The format and guidelines provided below give a most inclusive outline for a complex business case. While all of the guidelines should be considered w'hen developing the business case, the nature of the particular situation will, of necessity, dictate a possible modification of these guidelines. However, you must remember the objective. . . . present your process and case in a logical order, providing strong rationale . . . SELL YOUR IDEA. EXECUTING SUMMARY n A. n n. RI n n The Executive Summary should be a one to three page overview of the business case. It should highlight only the key points within each of the outline topics in the business case format. It is also advisable that the Executive Summary follow the same formatting as the actual presentation. It should not contain the detailed data to support the topic. Keep it at a high level...what would you want them to know if they were running after a departing flight. BUSINESS CASE FORMAT AND GUIDELINES A. B. Background. 1. 2. Current situation. This section should include a clear statement of the current situation, and should be based on facts. You should consider that the reader may know nothing about the situation at hand. Background information. Background information should include conditions leading up to the situation, and why the situation is now being considered. Previous attempts to solve the situation should be noted along with their results and short comings. Problem Definition. nLRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 14 R I 1. Problem statement. The problem section should be a concise statement which defines and describes the problem or situation. There may be a need to 2. R c. q q q q q D. n H E. 1 I I M q q convince the reader that a problem exists. Only one problem should be addressed at a time, avoid letting multiple problems confuse the situation. Considerations. What seems to be the real problem? What are the causes of the problem? To what extent are they known? Who is affected? What is the magnitude of the problem? Who are the primary actors in the situation? Analysis of Alternatives. 1. 2. J. Process. Provide a written description of how you generated and analyzed your alternatives. Be sure to include the participants. Identification. Identify all of the alternative programs or activities which you considered in your decision-making process. Be sure to describe the characteristics of each in factual terms. REMEMBER ... the do nothing alternative should always be analyzed as a possibility. Analysis. Each alternative should be discussed in terms of impact: impact on objective, impact on requirements, impact on legal obligations, impact on personnel, impact on finances. The section should include a statement as to why the alternative was rejected. Each analysis should be brief, but should clearly make its point. While you should have supporting information in your files, each analysis should not be to the level of detail as that in the selected alternative. Recommendation. 1. 2. Action recommended. The recommendation follows from the analysis of alternatives. The action recommended should be written in brief, clear, positive statements. Rationale. This section should provide the rationale for selecting a particular alternative, including a summary of the primary factors supporting the decision. Objective. 1. 2. J. Objective of the recommendation. Define the objective of the recommended action, not the immediate physical outputs. Goal support. This section should include statements and examples of how this program recommendation will support specific, stated goals of the District. It is important to establish a direct relationship. Evaluation criteria. In this section, you are going to define how you will know if you are meeting the specified objectives. These will become a major component of your future plan. There must be at least one evaluation criteria for each objective, and there are usually several. a) b) c) How can estimates of progress against these objectives be made? Identify the appropriate measures of effectiveness. Both quantitative and qualitative criteria may be used. qLRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 15 4. F. d) Be sure to consider what data you are going to need to prove the criteria, and how you are going to get the data. Is the criteria going to cost more than it will yield? Expected benefits. This analysis should include an explanation of the anticipated benefits and when they are expected to be realized. It should also identify the recipients of the expected benefits. Impact Analysis. 1. q 2. q q 3. 4. Program. Describe the impact of the program, both positive and negative. Call in the Expected Benefits above. If you execute this recommendation, how will it impact other programs...will something fall off the table[?] Who will be the primary actors impacted? Desegregation Plan. How will this recommendation impact the Desegregation Plan' Coun Orders. How will this recommendation impact court orders? Political factors. Are there major political factors that seem to affect the situation, and how will you address them? implementation plan' Are your strategies in the q 5. 6. q q q G. q q q q q H. Risks. This section should include a discussion of the risks of doing this program, and the risks of not doing this program. Timing. What are the major timing issues, and how will you deal with them? Resources Analysis. 1. 2. Personnel analysis. What is the projected impact on the head count and type of position before and after the recommendation? Include an estimate of support stafT required in both numbers and types of positions. Is there a recruiting pool from which to hire the needed personnel? Training requirements should be included. Financial analysis. AH of the financial considerations should be examined at this a) b) c) point. All operating costs, including personnel and benefits, for each of the next 1-5 fiscal years should be outlined. An estimate of equipment required should be prepared and should include all hardware and support equipment. Both capital expenditures and a monthly cost over the life of this equipment should be detailed. The source of revenue funding should be identified, along with any requirements. The cost savings forecast for the first year and years 2-5 (if appropriate) should be projected. A discussion of total cost savings potential should also be included. Force Field Analysis. q qLRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 16 1. 2. Forces For. Who will be the primary supporters of the recommendation' Why will they support the recommendation? How can you maximize the influence of these forces? Forces Against. Who will be the primary detractors of the recommendation? Why will they oppose the recommendation? How can you minimize their influence or win them over? J. Confidentiality. You should determine if you want to include this section in material for public release. I. General Implementation Plan. q 1. q 2. 3. N4ilestones. The general implementation plan should include the milestone events for monitoring. This should not be a detailed project plan. Timelines. Each milestone event should have a timeline associated with it. Tasking. Each milestone event should have a specific person, identified by q 4. name, tasked with ensuring the event is completed on time. A single overall project/program leader should be clearly identified. Reporting. Regular status reporting procedures on the implementation plan q should be identified in terms of who, what, when, and where. Status reports should be in the format of the implementation plan or an established standard reporting format. \" q quarterly basis. Status reports are usually submitted on a monthly or q 1 q q q q q J rLRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 17 ATTACHMENT 3 q Planning and Budgeting Time Line q JUL AUG SEP OCT I NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR [ APR I MAY JUN JUL AUG 1 PROGFW.1 INVENTORY q 2 PROGRW1 EVALllftnON T 3 NEEDS ASSESS^TEhfT q 4 GOALS q  f 5 PROGRAf.l DEVELOPMENT 6 BUXETING 7 I q MONITORING \u0026amp; REPORUNG I 8 REASSESSfAENT OF PLANNING PROCESS \u0026amp; ORGANIZATION q q q q q q q q q  4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4I I \u0026gt; 09 RECEIVF AUG 3 0 1996 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 Office of Desegregation Moimw.u.w I PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING PROCESS August 1996 Jc.' Mp IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF VS. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with this court's order of August 26, 1993, the Little Rock School District hereby gives notice of the filing of the Little Rock School District's August 1996 Program Planning and Budgeting Process (\"The Grey Book\") and the Little Rock School District's August Program Planning and Budgeting Tool for FY 1996- 97 and FY 1997-98. Respectfully submitted. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 BY: ^N C. FENDLEY, JR. Wo-3323 f:\\hanBUendlcyUnd\\KN-fiU30CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Notice of Filing has been served on the following by depositing a co .. the United States mail on this day of copy of same in\n, 19 : Mr. John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 (MAILED) Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026amp; JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 (MAILED) Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 425 W. Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201-3472 (MAILED) Mr. Richard Roachell Mr. Travis Creed Roachell Law Firm First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 (MAILED) Ms. Ann Brown Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 (HAND DELIVERED) Mr. Timothy G. Gauger Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 (MAILED) f:'haTncV/cndkyUfd\\aM-fil.83O -2- Little Rock School District PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING August 1996 General Concept A comprehensive program planning and budgeting process (Process) improves the Districts ability to allocate its revenue rationally and, therefore, have maximum impact on achieving the goals of the District. Linking program objectives and program expenditures assures that money is being spent appropriately. This document serves as an explanation of the Little Rock School Districts (LRSD) program planning and budgeting process. During the Process, the following will occur: 1. The needs of the District, particularly legal obligations under the desegregation and settlement plans, will be determined. 2. Goals and objectives will be defined. 3. Programs to achieve those objectives, particularly those required by the desegregation plans, will be defined. 4. 5. Performance standards and expenditures will be established and measured. Information for corrective decision-making will be prepared. Organizational Structure for Planning and Budgeting Process I. II. III. Key Players - The Superintendent leads the Process with direct support from the Cabinet. The Board is the ultimate decision-maker for the Process. Description - The Process is led by the Superintendent with direct support from the Superintendents Cabinet. The Process is coordinated by the Director of Planning, Research, and Evaluation (PRE) and the Manager for Support Services, who both serve on the Superintendents Cabinet. n A. B. c. A Management Tool (described later in this document) serves as a Planning Budget Calendar. The Calendar allows the Board to continuously monitor progress of the Process. The Director of PRE is the lead planning person. He/she ensures that the planning process is conducted according to established time frames, provides technical assistance, coordinates the planning process, collects appropriate reports, coordinates the preparation of related documents, and advises the Superintendent and Board on the Process. In addition, the lead planning person is responsible for ensuring that all requirements from the desegregation plans and court orders are integrated into the Process. The Director of PRE is to be assisted by a Planning, Research, and Evaluation Specialist whose major responsibility is District wide planning. Outcome - An organizational chart that displays the current lines of authority and responsibility is attached (see Attachment 1). The primary planning and budgetLRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 2 development tasks are finalized and included on a Project Management Tool by July (for the July Court submission). IV. Time frame - The organizational chart is reviewed/revised by August to ensure that the configuration is the most effective and efficient arrangement. Necessary revisions and adjustments are made as needed. Program Inventory Prior to the Needs Assessment period, which starts in September for the next budget year, the Program Inventory process begins in July\ncurrent desegregation and non-desegregation programs are identified. I. Key Players - The Superintendent provides overall direction, and the Board reviews the findings. The lead planning person coordinates the collection of basic data and prepares the data into appropriate documents for use in goal setting and program modification and/or development. The Cabinet and staff collect the necessary data. II. Description - The list of current programs and services is revised if necessary. New programs and services are identified and merged with the Program Budget Document as necessary. Likewise, programs that are no longer in place or that have met legal obligations are removed from the Program Budget Document. The desegregation plan and court orders are reviewed to ensure all obligations related to compliance are operative. Primary and secondary responsible persons are identified for each program or service. III. IV. tr Outcome - A Program Inventory Report is generated and used during the goals and objectives development process\nthe program addition, modification, and deletion-process\nand the budgeting process. Time frame - The Program Inventory process begins in July. A list of all desegregation and non-desegregation programs is compiled by August. The Program Inventory may be revised as needed. A A Program Evaluation Program evaluation provides an assessment of performance for decision-making purposes a I. II. as Key Players - The Board and Superintendent with assistance from the Cabinet, a: recipients of the extended evaluations, use the information from the evaluation of programs to guide programmatic direction and resource allocation. The lead planning person coordinates the program evaluation process. The Manager for Support Services provides assistance with supporting financial information. The Cabinet and staff prepare all reporting documents falling within their areas of responsibility. Description - Each program is evaluated through the Districts regular program evaluation component. As programs are developed and implemented, they contain program objectives and evaluation criteria. Special evaluations may be directed by the Superintendent. Programs may also be identified for fast-track evaluation on an as needed basis if they have high impact on the goals and direction of the District.LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 3 III. Outcome - Program evaluation information enables the District to make programmatic decisions in the areas of program modifications, additions, and deletions and resource IV. allocation, which are the result of careful planning and thoughtful analysis. Time frame - The program evaluation period for each budget year begins in July and continues through mid-November, leading up to the point of program development (i.e., Business Cases). Program evaluations are conducted on programs that were operating during the most recently completed school year. Needs Assessment The needs assessment is a process for comparing the current situation with the desired conditions. 1. II. Key Players - The Superintendent provides leadership and direction for the Needs Assessment process. The lead planning person coordinates the process. The Superintendent and the Cabinet identify the needs. The Superintendents Cabinet is responsible for directing the staff in the collection of assessment information. Description - Utilizing a combination of district wide perceptual and objective instruments, data are collected and analyzed to determine the needs of the students, parents, teachers, and administrators. Perceptual information is collected through broad-based input sessions such as Town Hall meetings and District Dialogue sessions. A. B. At least three Town Hall meetings are conducted. One town hall meeting each for area schools, magnet schools, and incentive schools are scheduled. Every effort is made to locate strategically the sessions to encourage maximum participation. Additional Town Hall meetings may be scheduled if needed. One District Dialogue is conducted with principals, teachers, classified staff, and central office administrators. Additional District Dialogues may be scheduled if c. Ml needed. An administrative work session is conducted to review and analyze various District wide reports and objective data. The following kinds of data are reviewed: HI 1. 2. J. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Stanford Achievement Test Results Planning, Research, and Evaluation Monitoring Reports Desegregation Monitoring Reports Audit from the Office of Desegregation Monitoring Court Orders Audit School Climate/Human Relations Survey Results District wide Facilities Study/Report Proportional Allocation Formulas Study Program Inventoiy b N M MLRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 4 D. A comparison between identified needs and the Program Inventory is conducted to determine whether or not programmatic gaps and areas of need exist. III. IV. Outcome - The outcome of the administrative work session, town hall meetings, and district dialogue sessions is a list of needs. District desegregation and non-desegregation programs are also evaluated for needs information. The Superintendent and Cabinet identify program(s) in need of an extended evaluation. Time frame - The Needs Assessment process begins in September with a review of the types of data that will be collected. A Needs Assessment report is generated by the end of November based upon findings from the Town Hall Meetings, District Dialogues, studies or reports, and the results of program evaluations. Broad-Based Feedback Broad-based feedback is designed to provide feedback to the various groups who participated in town hall meetings and district dialogues (as a counterpart to the Needs Assessment process). Every effort is made to include other interested groups, if appropriate. I. II III. IV. Key Players - The Board and the Superintendent will provide direction for broad-based feedback. The Director of Communications, with assistance from the lead planning person, will develop a plan for disseminating information. Description - Broad-based feedback sessions are designed to provide planning and budgeting process information to the community and LRSD employees. Target populations are the same as those at the broad-based input sessions conducted in September and October. Outcome - Positive community support in recognition of the thoroughly planned budgeting process may be generated. Time frame - Broad-based feedback sessions will be conducted the following March and April. ni Planning and Budget Goals The goal setting process guides all actions of the administration, expected outcomes for a specified period of time. The process defines the bh I. UI II. Key Players - The Board and Superintendent provide leadership for identifying the mission and goals of the district. The Cabinet provides assistance and support by defining objectives for programs which will satisfy the accepted goals. The goal setting process is coordinated by the lead planning person. Description - The Board conducts a work session. After reviewing the Needs Assessment Report and the Program Inventory Report, the Board: w UI A. B. Reviews and revises, if necessary, the mission statement. Establishes written goals/objectives. The goals and objectives define what the district expects to realistically accomplish for the next fiscal year. Goals and objectives that conflict with the desegregation plan are not adopted. I'l1 in w n 11 01 11 LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING III. IV. C. D. E. Page 5 I Reviews and provides guidance related to proportional allocation formulas (materials and supplies, staffing, etc.). Establishes written priorities. These priorities guide staff in program modification, addition, or deletion, as well as help allocate funding and resources during the budgeting process. Considers strategies for funding shortfalls. The Cabinet works to ensure that program goals and evaluation criteria are linked to the established goals. Outcome - At the conclusion of the Board Work Session, the Board publishes: A. B. c. A written mission statement Written goals A list of priorities The staff revises program objectives and evaluation criteria as needed for each program, and these are incorporated into the Program Budget Document. Time frame - The goal setting process is dependent on the Needs Assessment and Program Inventory. The Board Work Session is conducted in mid-December. Program objectives and evaluation criteria are subsequently revised as needed by appropriate staff. Program Development If a service or program does not exist to support the needs of the District, it may be necessary to develop a program or modify an existing program. Any additions, modifications, or deletions are supported by a business case (see Attachment 2) as outlined in II, A below. I. II. Key Players - The Superintendent will provide leadership and guidance to ensure that goals are achieved by offering the best possible programs. The Cabinet will provide direction to staff in developing, modifying, and implementing effective and efficient programs. The lead planning person will monitor and advise the Superintendent throughout the program modification and development phase. Description - Programs may need to be developed to address newly identified needs or fill gaps. Current programs may be modified to meet objectives. Some programs may be The District establishes a framework for Program Development. framework includes, where appropriate, the following: eliminated. The A. I. 2. 3. 4. Business Case Executive Summary Background Problem Definition Analysis of Alternatives i s I ! J 1 1 i S i ! S ! I ! s s I I SiLRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 6 B. III. IV. 4 If V. N H H Ml Ml 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Recommended Alternative Objective Impact Analysis Resource Analysis Force Field Analysis General Implementation Plan Appropriate changes to a Program Budget Document (see Planning Document in the Budgeting section) will be made as a result of program additions, modifications, or deletions. Program Development - (i e., program additions, modifications, or deletions) is conducted by staff with the appropriate Cabinet level official providing oversight to ensure that all tasks are completed in a timely manner. The Superintendent and the Cabinet review Program Development cases to ensure that commitments in the desegregation plan are not hindered by such Program Development. Outcome - A business case for each program that is added, modified, or deleted is written. As with existing programs, programs that are added or modified to satisfy a need include all of the elements for budget development and may be directly placed into the Program Budget Document. Time frame - The Program Development phase begins in November and concludes in February. However, some programs may be identified or recommended for possible addition, modification, or deletion at an earlier or later date (or as part of an ongoing process, if appropriate). Budgeting I. II. Key Players - The Board is the ultimate decision-making authority on the budget. However, the Superintendent ensures that a balanced budget is developed that meets the needs and goals of the school district. The Manager for Support Services coordinates the budget preparation process, and the lead planning person ensures that the planning and budgeting components are linked appropriately. Budget managers provide input relative to his or her area of responsibility. The Manager for Support Services will produce the budget information. Description - Funds, personnel, and facilities are allocated based on the goals and objectives of the district. Directions for budget preparation are issued by the III. Superintendent with assistance provided by the Manager for Support Services. These directions include the identification of all proportional formulas and exceptions. Outcome - A budget document is developed that satisfies traditional budgeting and accounting requirements with a program planning and budgeting component that links the program and budget allocations. Funding of desegregation requirements is a priority. IV. Time frame -LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 7 Month 4 4 4 4 4 4 Bl November December Januai'y February March May July August Task Issue instructions for budget preparation at all levels_________ Budget managers begin to submit requests for next school year Begin budget development__________________ Continue budget development_______________ Revise financial forecast\nPrepare Proposed Budget__________ Prepare Tentative Budget__________________ Prepare Final Budget_____________________ Board review and adoption of Budget\nSubmit budget to ADE Guidelines for Proposed. Tentative, and Final Budget Development The following guidelines help define the format and expectations, to the extent possible, of what is included in the Proposed, Tentative, and Final Budgets. I. II. Proposed Budget A. B. C. D. The Proposed Budget should be at the detailed level. The Proposed Budget should reflect a revised budget for the current fiscal year. The Proposed Budget should reflect, at the detail level, all additions, modifications, deletions, and shortfall strategies that have been approved to date. The Proposed Budget should reflect, in a separate listing, all additions, modifications, deletions, and shortfall strategies that are under consideration and should show the budget impact at the function and object level. Tentative Budget A. B. C. D. The format of the Tentative Budget should be similar to the Proposed Budget but may be modified at a later date, if necessary. The Tentative Budget should be at the detailed level. The Tentative Budget should build upon the Proposed Budget. The Tentative Budget should reflect, at the detail level, all additions, modifications, deletions, and shortfall strategies that have been approved to date. The additions, modifications, deletions, and shortfall strategies should be clearly identified. (Most items should be included at the detail level by this stage.)LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING 1 E. Page 8 4 The Tentative Budget should reflect, in a separate listing, all additions, modifications, deletions, and shortfall strategies that are under consideration, clearly showing the budget impact at the function and object level. 4 4 4 4 4 III. Final Budget A. B. C. D. The format of the Final Budget should be similar to that of the Proposed Budget but may be modified at a later date, if necessary. The Final Budget should be at the detailed level. The Final Budget should reflect, at the detail level, all additions, modifications, deletions, and shortfall strategies that the District intends to make during the fiscal year. These additions, modifications, deletions, and shortfall strategies should be clearly identified. The Final Budget should reflect what the District intends to deliver to the State Department of Education. 4 4 Monitoring and Reporting The Program Budget Document provides the means for monitoring program performance and expenditures throughout the fiscal year. I. Hi II. III. 4 d d Key Players - The Superintendent provides guidance for the maintenance of the Program Budget Document. Program Managers provide program information for their respective areas. The Manager for Support Services provides financial information for each program. The lead planning person coordinates the updating of the document. The Board and Superintendent are the recipients of the reports to assist them in oversight and decision-making. The lead planning person coordinates the process and prepares the Program Budget Document. Program Managers prepare all reporting documents within their areas of responsibility. Description - The Program Budget Document is the basis for monitoring and reporting and follows an established format and design. The Program Inventory provides the divisions within the Program Budget Document. Program managers, as primary leaders, are assigned responsibility for identified programs. Secondary leaders are assigned also. Program managers are responsible for accomplishing program objectives, for coordinating the required activities or strategies, and for the preparation and submission of the Program Budget Document. The document reflects both program performance and expenditures quarterly. Programs with poor performance or expenditure problems may be addressed by corrective action during the year rather than after the year is completed. Outcome - A Program Budget Document is maintained that becomes the basis for monitoring and reporting and also serves as a guide for interim decision-making. The result is a quarterly composite progress report on identified programs within the District, supported with expenditure information.n LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 9 IV. n Time frame - Reports are generated quarterly beginning with the first quarter of the fiscal year. 4 4 4 Reassessment of Process and Organization Planning and budgeting is a continuing process (see Attachment 3, Planning and Budgeting Cycle). As such, the Program Inventory begins in July, while the Needs Assessment begins in September. A review/revision of the Program Inventory for the future budget year is completed by August. The Reassessment of Process and Organization begins in July of the current year and concludes by August of the following year. The review process requires an examination of the Process for possible changes that prove beneficial to the Districts Program Planning and Budgeting Process. The reassessment requires a review of the Districts organizational structure to ensure that it is of the best configuration to meet the Districts needs. The lead planning person reviews the process and makes recommendations for changes to the Superintendent, when appropriate. The lead planning person ensures that the plannin. designed and coordinates the activities. 4 4 process is implemented as ig Management Tool The Management Tool is submitted to the Court by the end of each calendar month. The Management Tool serves as an instrument by which the District may monitor established timelines which are cardinal to the Planning and Budgeting Process. The Management Tool identifies the responsible person(s), activities, and timelines required ofand also serves asa Planning Budget Calendar. The Management Tool, in addition to the Program Budget 4 4 4 Document, is an outgrowth of the concepts described throughout this document. Further, items of significant importance to the District, but not necessarily directly linked to Program Planning and Budgeting, may be added to the tool, at the direction of the Superintendent, to allow the District to monitor additional issues or topics. The Management Tool is numbered to coincide with the Fiscal Year budget for which it is associated. The eight major components of the Management Tool include the following: 1) Program Inventory\n2) Program Evaluation\n3) Needs Assessment, 4) Planning and Budget Goals\n5) Program Development\n6) Budgeting\n7) Monitoring and Reporting\nand 8) Reassessment of Planning Process and Organization. 4 Summary One of the primary goals of the long-range planning and budget process is to instill in the minds of the patrons and others interested in the affairs of the District a sense of fiscal responsibility, accountability and internal program evaluation by the District. Such tools as the Program Inventory, Needs Assessment, and quarterly reporting serve not only to strengthen the process, as outlined in the monthly calendar of critical events, but also to increase the communitys awareness of the Desegregation Plan, the commitments it contains and the Districts carefully thought-out process designed to meet those commitments. With commitment comes the responsibility of providing funds and ensuring that the funding levels are sufficient to support those programs that are determined by the planning and evaluation process to be effective toward achieving the desired goals. Increased use and refinement of the Districts Position Control Inventory SystemLRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 10 1 4 4 4 software yields valuable data for program evaluation and budget decision making. Quarterly monitoring reports, by way of the Program Budget Document, are provided. This process, plus the program linkages serve as the basis for future funding decisions by the Board and the administration. The intent of these steps and procedures is to identify those programs which can either be modified or eliminated, thereby serving to demonstrate the level of fiscal responsibility needed to garner community support for future requests for funding. Further, by achieving greater staffing efficiency, reducing over-use of materials and supplies (i.e., through proportional allocations, etc.) and by directing the Districts resources toward those programs which demonstrate track records of success, the District will be able to reduce or eliminate its reliance on non-recurring revenue sources. Accordingly, the long-range planning and budget process is the key component of the Districts strategy to address anticipated funding shortfalls. 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 kLRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 11 ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1: Organizational Chart H Attachment 2: Business Case Format Attachment 3: Schematic Planning and Budget Cycle 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 (I TBA Assoc Supt I Suelien Vann Communications Director Nancy Aoe Student Atsignmenl Director Becky Rather Perent KecruSei Coordinator Or Ed Jackson Planning Research \u0026amp; Ev.iluaiion Dll actor MaiMn Schwartz Giania tMitar Debbie Milam Volunteers in Public Schools Little Rock School District Organizational Structure [ Board of Dtrodora ] I Brady Gadbarry Labor Relaltons Dr Richard Hurley Human Resources Dwecior Or Patty Kohler Ohr Of Eiceptional Children Oireaor Jo Evelyn Elston Pupil Services Director I TBA Manager for Support Services Mark Milhollen Fmanoal Servicoa Charbe Neal Procuremanl Doug Eaton Plant Servtcas Bobby Jones 8ecurily/Rish Management Mery Jane Cheaiham Oiracior of Transportation Morlin McCoy Food ServKos Director Dr Don Roberts Intarsn Si^enntortdenl 1 Loon Modesto Spedol Aasiatanl to SupenrMondani 1 TBA Asst. Supt Curnoilum Support Leon Adams Federal Programs/ Grants I - Margaret GramiBion Asai Supi Elementary Sadia Mitchell Assist Superintendenl Elementary 1 Dr Victor Anderson Assisi Si\u0026lt;\u0026gt;erintendenl Secondary Gene Partier Reading/Foraign Arts Or Lmda Watson Acting Asst St^l Student Hearing Pnnctpals 13 Schools Pmapals 17 Schools Principals 13 Schools Dennis Glasgow Science/Mathematics Supervisor Mane A McNeal Social Studies Supervisor Catherine GiN Parent Involvement Coordinator Sterling Ingram Staff Development Director Pat Price Earty Childhood Coordinator Lucy Lyon Technology/Media Sarvicas Coordinator Menan Shead-Jeckson HIPPY Supervisor Lmda Young New Futures David Besson Information Services Prmcapais S Incentive Schools Carol Green Vocational Education Paulette Marlin Aduil Educiilion Johnny Neeley Alleriialive Learning Centei Ray Gilluspie Athletics * * s o OQ \u0026gt; \u0026gt; O 3\" n -i r 50 CZI O -0 ?3 o o z3 0 r \u0026gt; \u0026gt; o C3 G o o (IQF n LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 13 H 4 ATTACHMENT 2 STCASE02 4 REVISED 21 APR 93 4 SHORT TERM PROJECT - BUSINESS CASE GUIDELINES AND FORMAT FOR BUSINESS CASE 4 I. 4  4 4 4 I. BACKGROUND A business case is a written presentation which identifies and describes the main features supporting the decision-making process on an issue facing the organization. The purpose is to put forth in a logical order all the facts surrounding the situation, all the steps in the decision process, impact of the decision, and a general implementation plan for the decision. In addition to being called a business case, this type of document is sometimes referred to as an issue paper, a stafT paper, a decision analysis, and a program analysis. While each of these types of presentations may vary slightly in content, the purpose remains essentially the same . . . decision support. The format and guidelines provided below give a most inclusive outline for a complex business case. While all of the guidelines should be considered when developing the business case, the nature of the particular situation will, of necessity, dictate a possible modification of these guidelines. However, you must remember the objective. . . . present your process and case in a logical order, providing strong rationale . . . SELL YOUR IDEA. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 A. 4 4 IL The Executive Summary should be a one to three page overview of the business case. It should highlight only the key points within each of the outline topics in the business case format. It is also advisable that the Executive Summary follow the same formatting as the actual presentation. It should not contain the detailed data to support the topic. Keep it at a high level.. .what would you want them to know if they were running after a departing flight. BUSINESS CASE FORMAT AND GUIDELINES A. Background, 4 1. 2. Current situation. This section should include a clear statement of the current situation, and should be based on facts. You should consider that the reader may know nothing about the situation at hand. Background information. Background information should include conditions leading up to the situation, and why the situation is now being considered. Previous attempts to solve the situation should be noted along with their results and short comings. B. Problem Definition.4 LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 14 q 1. q q 2. q c. q q q q q D. q q q E. q Problem statement. The problem section should be a concise statement which defines and describes the problem or situation. There may be a need to convince the reader that a problem exists. Only one problem should be addressed at a time\navoid letting multiple problems confuse the situation. Considerations. What seems to be the real problem? What are the causes of the problem? To what extent are they known? Who is affected? What is the magnitude of the problem? Who are the primary actors in the situation? Analysis of Alternatives. 1. 2. 3. Process. Provide a written description of how you generated and analyzed your alternatives. Be sure to include the participants. Identification. Identify all of the alternative programs or activities which you considered in your decision-making process. Be sure to describe the characteristics of each in factual terms. REMEMBER ... the do nothing alternative should always be analyzed as a possibility. Analysis. Each alternative should be discussed in terms of impact: impact on objective, impact on requirements, impact on legal obligations, impact on personnel, impact on finances. The section should include a statement as to why the alternative was rejected. Each analysis should be brief, but should clearly make its point. While you should have supporting information in your files, each analysis should not be to the level of detail as that in the selected alternative. Recommendation. 1. 2. Action recommended. The recommendation follows from the analysis of alternatives. The action recommended should be written in brief, clear, positive statements. Rationale. This section should provide the rationale for selecting a particular alternative, including a summary of the primary factors supporting the decision. Objective. 1. 2. Objective of the recommendation. Define the objective of the recommended action, not the immediate physical outputs. Goal support. This section should include statements and examples of how this program recommendation will support specific, stated goals of the District. It is important to establish a direct relationship. 3. Evaluation criteria. In this section, you are going to define how you will know if you are meeting the specified objectives. These will become a major component of your future plan. There must be at least one evaluation criteria for each objective, and there are usually several. a) b) c) How can estimates of progress against these objectives be made? Identify the appropriate measures of effectiveness. Both quantitative and qualitative criteria may be used.I n 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING F. G. H. 4. Page 15 d) Be sure to consider what data you are going to need to prove the criteria, and how you are going to get the data. Is the criteria going to cost more than it will yield? Expected benefits. This analysis should include an explanation of the anticipated benefits and when they are expected to be realized. It should also identify the recipients of the expected benefits. Impact Analysis. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Program. Describe the impact of the program, both positive and negative. Call in the Expected Benefits above. If you execute this recommendation, how will it impact other programs...will something fall off the table[?] Who will be the primary actors impacted? Desegregation Plan. How will this recommendation impact the Desegregation Plan' Court Orders. How will this recommendation impact court orders? Political factors. Are there major political factors that seem to affect the situation, and how will you address them? implementation plan? Are your strategies in the Risks. This section should include a discussion of the risks of doing this program, and the risks of not doing this program. Timing. What are the major timing issues, and how will you deal with them? Resources Analysis. 1. 2. Personnel analysis. What is the projected impact on the head count and type of position before and after the recommendation? Include an estimate of support staff required in both numbers and types of positions. Is there a recruiting pool from which to hire the needed personnel? Training requirements should be included. Financial analysis. All of the financial considerations should be examined at this point. a) b) c) All operating costs, including personnel and benefits, for each of the next 1-5 fiscal years should be outlined. An estimate of equipment required should be prepared and should include all hardware and support equipment. Both capital expenditures and a monthly cost over the life of this equipment should be detailed. The source of revenue funding should be identified, along with any requirements. The cost savings forecast for the first year and years 2-5 (if appropriate) should be projected. A discussion of total cost savings potential should also be included. Force Field Analysis. 4LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING 1 I 4 4 I 4 4 4 4 4 Page 16 I. 1. 2. 3. Forces For. Who will be the primary supporters of the recommendation? Why will they support the recommendation? How can you maximize the influence of these forces? Forces Against. Who will be the primary detractors of the recommendation? Why will they oppose the recommendation? How can you minimize their influence or win them over? Confidentiality. You should determine if you want to include this section in material for public release. General Implementation Plan. 1. 2. 3. Milestones. The general implementation plan should include the milestone events for monitoring. This should not be a detailed project plan. Timelines. Each milestone event should have a timeline associated with it. Tasking. Each milestone event should have a specific person, identified by name, tasked with ensuring the event is completed on time. A single overall project/program leader should be clearly identified. 4. Reporting. Regular status reporting procedures on the implementation plan should be identified in terms of who, what, when, and where. Status reports should be in the format of the implementation plan or an established standard reporting format. quarterly basis. Status reports are usually submitted on a monthly or 4 4 4 4 4LRSD - PROGRAM PLANNING AND BUDGETING Page 17 ATTACHMENT 3 Planning and Budgeting Time Line JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG 1 PROGRAM INVENTORY 2 PROGRAM EVALUATION I  3 NEEDS ASSESSfVlENT 4 GOALS T 5 PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT I 6 BUDGETING I I I I I I 7 I MONITORING \u0026amp; REPORTING I I I I I I I 8 REASSESSMENT OF PLAfMING PROCESS \u0026amp; ORGANIZATION il II Dl II IIhl fl DI H II\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1446","title":"Report: ''Report on Elementary School Facilities in the North Little Rock School District,'' Office of Desegregation Monitoring, United States District Court, Little Rock, Ark.","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, North Little Rock, 34.76954, -92.26709"],"dcterms_creator":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)"],"dc_date":["1996-07-31"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","School facilities"],"dcterms_title":["Report: ''Report on Elementary School Facilities in the North Little Rock School District,'' Office of Desegregation Monitoring, United States District Court, Little Rock, Ark."],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1446"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":["38 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1647","title":"Court Filings: Court of Appeals, brief for appellant Little Rock School District (LRSD)","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit"],"dc_date":["1996-07-19"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Economic aspects","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School management and organization","Cleaning"],"dcterms_title":["Court Filings: Court of Appeals, brief for appellant Little Rock School District (LRSD)"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1647"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["10 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 96-2047EALR LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. SERVICEMASTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES Appeal From The United States District Court For the Eastern District of Arkansas Western Division Honorable Susan Webber Wright, District Judge BRIEF FOR APPELLANT LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Christopher Heller John c. Fendley, Jr. APPELLANT APPELLEE Friday, Eldredge \u0026 Clark 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 Attorneys for Little Rock School District I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I summary And Request For oral Argument This appeal arises from the Pulaski County, Arkansas school desegregation case. The two issues presented by this appeal concern the district court's March 11, 1996 Memorandum and Order. The first issue concerns enforcement of the 1989 Settlement Agreement among the parties. The Settlement Agreement requires dismissal of this case with prejudice except that the district court may retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement and the desegregation plans presently being implemented by the Pulaski County school districts. The district court declined to issue an order dismissing this case. The second issue concerns a contract between the Little Rock School District and Servicemaster Management Services. The Little Rock School District challenges the district court's finding that a clause in that contract violates public policy. The Little Rock School District requests oral argument. i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table of contents Summary and Request For Oral Argument. Table of Contents .. Table of Authorities Preliminary Statement Statement of the Case Summary of Argument Argument Conclusion Addendum Order, March 11, 1996 Release of All Claims Against The LRSD. Agreement Regarding Litigation Among Joshua and the Districts .... Order, December 11, 1995 Relevant Excerpts From Pulaski County Desegregation . i ii iii . 1  2  6 . 7 13 . 1 12 24 25 Case Settlement Agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 ii I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Table of Authorities cases Continental Bank \u0026 Trust Co. v. American Bonding 630 F.2d 606, 608 (8th Cir. 1980) ..... Klein v. Arkoma Production Co. 73 F.3d 779 (8th Cir. 1996) Liddell v. State of Missouri 731 F.2d 1294 (8th Cir. 1984) LRSD v. PCSSD, 921 F.2d 1371 (8th Cir. 1990) LRSD v. PCSSD, 971 F.2d 160 (8th Cir. 1992) . Thornton v. Carter, 109 F.2d 316 (8th Cir. 1940) Page   9 9, 10  .     9 . 1, 2, 7 1, 6, 7, 9, 10 10 Union National Bank v. Federal National Mortgage Association 860F.2d 847 (8th Cir. 1988) ........... 1, 12, 14 28 u.s.c. S 1291 28 u.s.c. S 1331 28 u.s.c. S 1343(3) 28 u.s.c. S 1343(4) 28 u.s.c.  2201 28 u.s.c. S 2202 statutes iii . 1 . . 1 . 1 . . 1 . . 1 . 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Preliminary Statement The decisions below were rendered by Judge Susan Webber Wright, United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas. The jurisdiction of the district court was invoked under 28 u.s.c.  1331, 1343(3) and (4), 2201 and 2202. This Court's jurisdiction is invoked under 28 u.s.c. S 1291. The orders from which these appeals have been taken are final. The district court's order of March 11, 1996, by which the district court (1) refused to enter an order dismissing this case with prejudice according to the tei;:-ms of the Settlement Agreement among the parties and (2) invalidated a provision of the contract between the Little Rock School District (LRSD) and Servicemaster Management Services ( Servicemaster) , was appealed by LRSD by Notice of Appeal filed on April 9, 1996. 1. 2. Issues Presented on Appeal Did the district court err by refusing to enter an order dismissing this case with prejudice as required by the Settlement Agreement approved by this Court? LRSD v. PCSSD, 921 F.2d 1371 (8th Cir. 1990) LRSD v. PCSSD, 971 F.2d 160 (8th Cir. 1992) Did the district court err in finding that the \"pending litigation clause\" of LRSD's agreement with Servicemaster violates public policy? Union National Bank v. Federal National Mortgage Association. 860 F.2d 847 (8th Cir. 1988) 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I statement of the Case This appeal concerns two separate issues: The district court's refusal to enter an order dismissing this case with prejudice in accordance with the Settlement Agreement approved by this Court; and the district court's finding that the \"pending litigation clause\" of LRSD's contract with Servicemaster violates public policy. These issues will be addressed separately in both the Statement of the Case and the Argument. I. Dismissal With Prejudice This Court approved the Settlement Agreement among the parties to this case on December 12, 1990. LRSD v, PCSSD, 921 F.2d 1371 (8th Cir. 1990). The purpose of the Settlement Agreement was to end the litigation among the parties. That intent, inherent in any settlement, is clearly expressed in the provisions of the Settlement Agreement which require release of all claims against the school districts and the provision regarding litigation among or between the Joshua Intervenors, the Knight Intervenors and any of the school districts. Attachment B to the Settlement Agreement is a \"Release of All Claims Against The LRSD\" which contains the following requirement: It is further understood and agreed that the litigation now pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Western Division, entitled Little Rock School District v. Pulaski county special School District No. 1, et al, No. LR-C-82-866 and cases consolidated therein and their predecessors (including, but not limited to, Cooper v. Aaron, Norwood v. Tucker, and Clark v. Board of Education of the Little Rock School District) (the \"Litigation\") is to be dismissed with prejudice as to the LRSD and 2 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I the former and current members of its board of education named in the Litigation. This dismissal is final for all purposes except that the court may retain jurisdiction to address issues regarding the implementation of the Plans. Pulaski County Desegregation Case Settlement Agreement, Attachment B, p. 2 (Add. p. 13). The Settlement Agreement also requires that this case be dismissed with prejudice with respect to the Pulaski County Special School District and the North Little Rock School District. Settlement Agreement, Attachment c, p. 2 (Add. p. 17) and Attachment D, p. 2 (Add. p. 21). Finally, the Settlement Agreement contains the following \"Agreement Regarding Litigation Among Joshua And The Districts\": Joshua releases the Districts of all liability for issues which have been raised, or could have been raised, in this Litigation and commits that there will be no further litigation among or between Joshua, Knight and any of the districts, other than proceedings to enforce the terms of this settlement or the terms of the Plans. The requirement of the releases that this case \"is to be dismissed with prejudice\" has never been implemented. LRSD filed a motion on November 30, 1995 asking the district court to enter the required order. Even though the ; district court found that \"the claims involved in this ongoing litigation were dismissed, at least as a technical matter, 11 that court refused to enter an order 3 I I dismissing this case. 1 Memorandum and Order, March 11, 1996 (Add. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 8-9). II. The Servicemaster contract On September 20, 1995, LRSD entered into a five year management agreement with Servicemaster Management Services. LRSD App. p., 69. While the agreement was being negotiated, the Joshua Intervenors (\"Joshua\") filed a motion to enjoin LRSD from entering into an agreement with Servicemaster. Docket No. 2506. The District Court had taken no action on Joshua's motion by the time an agreement was reached between LRSD and Servicemaster, and accordingly, the following clause was included in the September 2 O, 1995 agreement: 14.12 Pending litigation. Each of the parties agrees that as of the date of the execution of this Agreement, a motion to enjoin School from entering into this Agreement with ServiceMaster is now pending in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas, Western Division, styled \"Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County School District No. 1, et al.\", No. LR-C- 82-866. ServiceMaster does hereby release and forever discharge school from any and all actions, causes of action, claims or demands which ServiceMaster may hereinafter have arising out of or in any way relating directly or indirectly, from orders issued by the United States District Court which may terminate or modify this Agreement. School is under no obligation or duty to appeal any decisions of the United States District Court affecting this Agreement. Further, the school's liability hereunder will be subject to the outcome (through either settlement, order of the court or otherwise) of that litigation. LRSD App., p. 84. (\"Pending Litigation Clause\"). 1The district court apparently misread LRSD's motion as seeking an order \"dismissing this case without prejudice.\" The Settlement Agreement requires, and LRSD sought, an order dismissing the case with prejudice. 4 I I I I I I I I I On December 4, 1995, Joshua purported to accept a proposed settlement offer2 made by LRSD related to Servicemaster. LRSD App. , p. 2 06. The settlement agreement recognized that substantial questions existed as to the legality of LRSD's agreement with Servicemaster. LRSD App., p. 200. On September 29, 1995, Arkansas Attorney General Winston Bryant issued a formal opinion finding that LRSD's agreement with Servicemaster violated state law and was void. App., p. 195. At the October 28, 1995, hearing, the District Court commented that she believed LRSD's agreement with Servicemaster violated state law. Hearing Transcript, October 28, 1995, p. 140. Accordingly, the settlement terminated LRSD' s agreement with Servicemaster. LRSD App., p. 203. On December 11, 1995, the District Court rejected the settlement agreement finding that the Pending Litigation Clause of LRSD's agreement with Servicemaster violated public policy. Add. p. 30. In a Memorandum and Order filed March 11, 1996, the district I I court denied Joshua's motion for reconsideration of her December I 11, 1995 Order. Add. p. 5. From this order, LRSD appeals. I I I I I I I 2LRSD denies that a settlement offer was made to Joshua. Even so, LRSD is pursuing this appeal to maintain its right, as established by the Pending Litigation Clause, to enter into a settlement agreement which would effectively terminate its agreement with Servicemaster. The District Court declined to rule on the issue of whether a settlement was actually reached. LRSD Add. p. 29. 5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Summary of Argument I. Dismissal With Prejudice The 1989 Settlement Agreement among the parties to this case waw designed to end this litigation. The Settlement Agreement requires that this case be dismissed with prejudice and also provides that the district court may retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement and the terms of the desegregation plans adopted by the three Pulaski County school districts. This Court approved the Settlement Agreement in its entirety as written by the parties and, in a case directly on point, directed the district court to implement the entire agreement. LRSD v. PCSSD. 971 F.2d 160 (8th Cir. 1992) .The district court has declined to enter an order dismissing this case with prejudice as required by the Settlement Agreement. II. servicemaster Contract LRSD contracted with Servicemaster to provide certain management services. Pending at the time of the contract was the Joshua Intervenor's motion to enjoin LRSD from entering the contract. LRSD and Servicemaster therefore agreed upon contract language which recognized the pending litigation and protected LRSD against liability to Servicemaster if the pending litigation resulted, whether through settlement or otherwise, in the termination or modification of the contract. The Pending Litigation Clause was agreed upon following arms length negotiations between LRSD and Servicemaster. The district court improperly voided the Pending Litigation Clause, concluding 6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I \"that it would not be consistent with public policy to permit one party to a contract to escape its obligations unilaterally without a similar provision for the other contracting party.\" The district court's conclusion is incorrect and should be reversed. Arkansas law, as interpreted by this Court, recognizes the validity of a contract provision permitting unilateral termination of the contract without cause. I. Argument The District court Erred In Refusing To Enter The order Of Dismissal Required By The settlement Agreement. This Court approved the parties' Settlement Agreement on December 12, 1990 and directed the district court \"to approve the parties' Settlement Agreement as written by them.\" LRSD y. PCSSD. 921 F.2d 1371, 1394 (8th Cir. 1990). On January 18, 1991, the district court ordered that \"[t]he parties' settlement agreement is hereby approved as written by them.\" Docket #1418. According to the terms of the Settlement Agreement set forth in the Statement of the Case and reproduced in its Appendix, LRSD, PCSSD and NLRSD were entitled to an order of dismissal with prejudice upon the district court's approval of the Settlement Agreement. 3 The question of whether a particular component of the Settlement Agreement should be implemented has arisen once before 3The order of dismissal with prejudice required by the Settlement Agreement will not affect the district court's authority under the Settlement Agreement \"to address issues regarding the implementation of the Plans\" (Settlement Agreement, Attachment B, p. 2) (Add. p. 13) or to preside over \"proceedings to enforce the terms\" of the Settlement Agreement or the desegregation plans. (Settlement Agreement, p. 19 (Add. p. 24). 7 I I in this case. In LRSD v. PCSSD, 971 F.2d 160 (8th Cir. 1992), this Court confronted the issue of whether the district court was I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I required to extend certain millages in accordance with Item M of the Settlement Agreement. The district court had \"thought it 'unwise to infer from the court of appeals' approval of the settlement agreement that [the district court was] required to extend the omitted millages.'\" Ig. at 164 (emphasis in original). This court said: What the district court failed to recognize is that we directed it to \"approve the parties' settlement agreement as written by them.\" \" [A] s written by them, \" the settlement agreement included Item M, which corrected the problem of the omitted millages. The extension of the omitted millages is therefore settled as law of the case. .Ig. at 165 (citations omitted, emphasis in original). One of the reasons the district court had given for declining to implement Item M was that, even though this Court had approved the Settlement Agreement in its entirety, it had not specifically mentioned Item Min its opinion. Id. at 164. This Court made it clear that the parties are entitled to implementation of all of the terms of the settlement Agreement: The Special Master approved the agreement, including Item M, as did the district court. Most importantly, when the matter came before this Court on appeal from the district court, we held that the settlement agreement as drafted by the parties met constitutional standards and directed the district court to approve the settlement agreement as submitted by the parties. We do not, therefore, agree with the district court that it is necessary to infer an approval of Item M from our earlier opinion. Our language was clear in its 8 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I approval of the entire agreement, including Item M. lg. at 165 (emphasis in original) This Court's decision requiring the district court to recognize and uphold each component of the Settlement Agreement was based upon the law of the case doctrine. ,lg. at 165. That doctrine \"prevents repeated litigation of . the same issue and promotes uniformity of decision.\" Liddell v. state of Missouri, 731 F. 2d 1294, 1304-05 (8th Cir. 1984). This Court has held that it \"will reconsider a previously decided issue only on a showing of clear error and manifest injustice,\" .i,g., or if the facts of the case have changed substantially since the first appeal.~ Continental Bank \u0026 Trust co. y. American Bonding. 630 F.2d 606, 608 (8th cir. 1980). When a case has been decided by this Court and remanded to the district court, every question which was before this Court and disposed of by its decree is finally settled and determined. Klein v. Arkoma Production Co., 73 F.3d 779, 784 (8th Cir. 1996). In rejecting LRSD's effort to secure an order of dismissal with prejudice, the district court did not find either that this Court's previous opinion approving the Settlement Agreement resulted in clear error or manifest injustice or that the facts of the case have changed. The only question, therefore, should be whether this Court has previously ordered that this case be dismissed with prejudice. LRSD v. PCSSD, 971 F.2d 160, 165 (8th Cir. 1992). The language of the court-approved Settlement Agreement makes it clear that this case \"is to be dismissed with prejudice\" and that the \"dismissal is final for all purposes except that the 9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I court may retain jurisdiction to address issues regarding the implementation\" of the desegregation plans agreed upon by the parties. Settlement Agreement, Attachment B, p. 2 (Add. p. 13). The parties further agreed that there would be \"no further litigation\" among them other than proceedings to enforce the Settlement Agreement or the desegregation plans. Settlement Agreement, p. 19 (Add. p. 24). This Court approved the agreement. It is the law of the case. In accordance with the law of the case doctrine previously applied to this Settlement Agreement by this Court, the district court should be directed to enter an order dismissing this case with prejudice in accordance with the terms of the settlement Agreement. LRSD v. Pesso. 971 F,2d 160 (8th Cir. 1992) . The district court offered no persuasive justification for declining to enter the required order. The court said that \"no useful purpose would be served by entering an order of dismissal at this time.\" Memorandum and Order, March 11, 1996, (Add. p. 8). Once the entire Agreement has been approved and established as law of the case, it is not necessary for a party seeking to secure the benefits of the Agreement to convince the district court that each particular component of the Agreement serves some useful purpose. Id. The district court is bound by this Court's decision and must carry it into execution according to the mandate. Klein v. Arkoma Production Co., 73 F.3d 779,784 (8th Cir. 1996). \"It may not 'alter it, examine it except for purposes of execution, or give it any further or other relief or review it for apparent error with 10 I I respect to any question decided on appeal.'\" lg. (quoting Thornton I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I v. carter, 109 F.2d 316, 319-20 (8th cir. 1940). If, as the district court found, \"the claims involved in this on-going litigation were dismissed, at least as a technical matter,\" there should be no impediment to formalizing that dismissal as required by the Settlement Agreement. The district court also criticized LRSD's implementation of its desegregation plans and found \"that an order of dismissal should be deferred in order to insure compliance with the plans and the agreement.\" This argument completely ignores the language of the Settlement Agreement which authorizes the district court to \"retain jurisdiction to address issues regarding implementation\" of the desegregation plans. Settlement Agreement, Attachment B, p. 2 (Add. p. 13). The Settlement Agreement precludes further litigation among the parties except for proceedings to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement and the terms of the desegregation plans. Settlement Agreement, p. 19. (Add. p. 24). The Settlement Agreement provides for both dismissal of this case with prejudice and for continued district court enforcement of the Settlement Agreement and the desegregation plans. It is not necessary for the district court to defer an order of dismissal in order to ensure compliance with the plans or the agreement. 4In accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the State of Arkansas has been dismissed as a party to this case. Order, January 18, 1991 (Docket #1418). The district court nevertheless continues to monitor the State's implementation of its obligations under the Settlement Agreement and to enforce the Settlement Agreement against the State. The district court's January 13, 1995 decision, which was affirmed in part and reversed 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II. The District Court Erred In Litigation Clause\" of LRSD's Violates Public Policy. Bolding That contract With The \"Pending Servicemaster A. Pending Litigation Clause Does Hot Violate Public Policy. The district court, citing no authority, concluded that \"it would not be consistent with public policy to permit one party to a contract to escape its obligations unilaterally without a similar provision for the other contracting party.\" Add., p. 5. The district court's conclusion is incorrect and should be reversed. In Union National Bank v. Federal National Mortgage Association, 860 F.2d 847, 853 (8th cir. 1988), this Court, applying Arkansas law, held that a contract provision providing for the unilateral termination of the contract without cause did not violate public policy. 5 The Pending Litigation Clause cannot be considered more offensive to public policy than a provision permitting unilateral termination without cause. The clause merely anticipated the possibility that substantial questions would be raised as to the validity of the agreement. In that event, LRSD wanted to be able to take whatever action was necessary without incurring liability to Servicemaster, and it negotiated at arms in part by this panel on May 15, 1996 (83 F.3d 1013), provides a recent example. 5The district court attempted to distinguish Union National Bank stating that the present case \"involves a purported settlement between a contracting party and a third party allowing the contracting party to escape its obligations unilaterally without a similar provision for the non-settling party.\" LRSD Add., p. 5. The district court does not explain how these facts distinguish Union National Bank from the present case. None of the facts noted by the district court require an outcome in the present case different from Union National Bank. 12 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I length for that right as embodied in the Pending Litigation Clause. B. The Pending Litigation Clause Expressly Contemplates Resolution By settlement. As an alterative basis for rejecting the settlement agreement, the District Court found that: (T]he parties to this case intended that the contract would be performed in good faith unless this Court issued an Order allowing the LRSD to escape liability pursuant to 1 14.12 of the contract. The Court has not and will not at this time issue such an Order allowing the LRSD to escape liability under the contract. LRSD Add., p. 6. The district court's statement of the parties' intentions contradicts the express language of the Pending Litigation Clause. After stating that LRSD will incur no liability if the District Court terminates or modifies the agreement, the Pending Litigation Clause provides, \"Further, the school's liability hereunder will be subject to the outcome (through either settlement, order of the court or otherwise) of that litigation.\" LRSD App., p. 84 (emphasis supplied). Thus, the Pending Litigation Clause expressly permits LRSD to reach a settlement without incurring any liability to Servicemaster. conclusion The 1989 Settlement Agreement was intended to end this litigation. The parties agreed that the case would be dismissed with prejudice. This Court and the district court have approved the settlement. It has become established as the law of the case. This court has previously held that the parties are entitled to all of I the benefits of the Settlement Agreement. The district court should I I I 13 I I I therefore be directed to enter an order dismissing this case with prejudice. LRSD and Servicemaster negotiated at arms length in agreeing to the Pending Litigation Clause. LRSD expressly reserved the I right to resolve the pending litigation with Joshua by way of I settlement. That the settlement calls for termination of LRSD's agreement with Servicemaster does not make the Pending Litigation I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Clause violative of public policy. See Union National Bank, 860 F.2d at 853. The District Court's finding to the contrary should be reversed and the case remanded for hearings to determine whether a settlement has been reached. Respectfully submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026 CLARK 2000 First Commercial Bldg. 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 376-2011 Christopher Heller John C. Fendley, Jr. 14 Attorneys for Little Rock School District I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing Brief for Appellant, Little Rock School District has been served on the following by depositing copy of same in the United States mail on this 8th day of July, 1996: Mr. John w. Walker JOHN W. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Mr. Sam Jones WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 2200 Worthen Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES, P.A. 3400 TCBY Bldg. Capitol \u0026 Broadway Streets Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Richard Roachell First Federal Plaza 401 West Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Ann Brown - HAND DELIVERED Desegregation Monitor Heritage West Bldg., Suite 510 201 East Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Ms. Elizabeth Boyter Arkansas Dept. of Education 4 State Capitol Mall Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. John c. Everett 3822 N. Parkview Drive P.O. Box 1646 Fayetteville, AR 72702 Mr. Josephs. Mowery 111 Center Little Rock, AR 72201 ~\" 15 I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I I I I I I ADDENDUM  I I I I I I I I I I I I II ,.1,r.,_~ US OIS7i-iCT COURT !;ASTERN DISTRICT ARt\u003cANSAS MAR 1 1 1996 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JAMcS WESTERN DIVISION By:_~.i...,..~l,J!,,,J,...l,L..ll~~ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT vs. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL SERVICEMASTER MANAGEMENT SERVICES, A Limited Partnership MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS Before the Court are a number of motions (listed in the order filed) which the Court now addresses: (1) motion of the Pulaski county Special School District (\"PCSSD\") to withdraw supervision from three discrete areas of the PCSSD plan [doc.#2481); (2) motion of the Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") for partial unitary status (doc.#2483); (3) motion of the Joshua Intervenors (\"Joshua\") to enjoin the LRSD from entering into a service contract without following bidding procedures, requests for information and without prior involvement of Joshua [doc.#2506); (4) motion of PCSSD to I clarify the PCSSD desegregation plan (doc.#2520); (5) motion of I I I I I I Joshua for the Court to set forth in detail the continuing obligations of the LRSD under the desegregation plan with respect to faculty and staff desegregation (doc.#2544); (6) motion of PCSSD for an Order regarding portable buildings (doc.#2546]; (7) motion of LRSD for an Order dismissing this case without prejudice with respect to LRSD, PCSSD, and the North Little Rock School District (\"NLRSD\") (doc.#2573]; (8) motion of Joshua for reconsideration of 1 2 6 40 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I the Court's Order of December 11, 1995, and for completion of the hearing [doc.#2594]; and (9) motion of PCSSD regarding the replacement of portable buildings with permanent construction, dated October 25, 1995 (doc.#2612). I. The Court first addresses PCSSD's motion to withdraw supervision from three discrete areas of the PCSSD plan (doc.#2481) and LRSD's motion for partial unitary status [doc.#2483). The PCSSD states that it has substantially complied with plan provisions regarding library media services, staff development and counseling services, while the LRSD states that it has substantially complied with LRSD plan provisions regarding Home Instructional Program for Preschool Youngsters (\"HIPPY\") , Rockefeller Early Childhood Program, Parkview Science Magnet Program, and Job Training Partnership Act/Summer Learning Program (\"JTPA\"). Both the PCSSD and the LRSD argue that the Court should withdraw supervision from these areas of the respective plans. The PCSSD's and LRSD's motions were both filed on August 23, 1995. on February 9, 1996, the parties entered into a Stipulation whereby it was agreed that the PCSSD, LRSD, and NLRSD should be released from court supervision and monitoring in certain discrete areas of the desegregation plans. The parties further stated that they are in the process of assessing what additional areas of the ctesegregation plans are ripe for release from Court supervision and monitoring and to identify what areas of the desegregation plans -2- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I remain deficient in terms of compliance. The additional hearings that were scheduled to address the motions to withdraw were cancelled at the parties' request as a result of the Stipulation. In light of the Stipulation and subsequent cancellation of the hearings, the Court finds that both the PCSSD's motion to withdraw (doc.#2481) and the LRSD's motion for partial unitary status [doc.#2483) have both been superseded by the Stipulation. Accordingly, these motions are denied as moot. II. On August 31, 1995, Joshua filed a motion to enjoin the LRSD from entering into a service contract without following bidding procedures, requests for information and without prior involvement of the Joshua Intervenors [doc.#2506). In its motion Joshua argues that ( 1) the LRSD had not discussed the proposed management services contract with the Joshua Intervenors, (2) the proposed management contract has a potential adverse racial effect and impact, (3) the proposed management contract has not been let for bids and is not a part of the program, research and evaluation instrument for the next five years, (4) the proposed management contract has potential adverse monetary effects upon financial resources of the district and has the potential for adversely affecting the ability of the school district to meet its desegregation obligations, and (5) the proposed management contract was not negotiated at arms' length and was designed to provide special favor to some unknown person in the school district. -3- 3 I I I I The Court held a hearing on Joshua's motion on Saturday, October 28, 1995, and again on Friday, December 8, 1995. At the hearing on December 8th, counsel for Joshua tendered into evidence a document entitled \"Settlement,\" which Joshua maintains constitutes a settlement offer by LRSD that was accepted by Joshua with respect to the ServiceMaster contract. Joshua claims that this constitutes an offer by LRSD to settle the matter with Joshua by having the Court enter an Order enjoining the LRSD from entering I I into the ServiceMaster agreement and terminating the district's I liability pursuant to Paragraph 14.12 of the contract. The LRSD, however, contends that this document was not intended as an offer I I I I I I I I I I I I to settle, in that it is stamped \"Draft\" and is not signed by any party or the attorney for any party. On December 11, 1995, this Court issued an Order in which it ruled as follows: This Court declines to rule on whether this 'settlement' constitutes a binding agreement on the district or on whether the board of directors delegated Mr. Malone the authority to enter into it with Joshua. The court finds that even if Mr. Malone had the authority and even if it was an offer to settle which Joshua accepted, public policy prohibits this type of settlement. This 'settlement' purports to create a situation in which this Court, by agreement of Joshua and  "}],"pages":{"current_page":451,"next_page":452,"prev_page":450,"total_pages":6797,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":5400,"total_count":81557,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"educator_resource_mediums_sms","items":[{"value":"lesson plans","hits":319},{"value":"teaching guides","hits":53},{"value":"timelines (chronologies)","hits":43},{"value":"online exhibitions","hits":38},{"value":"bibliographies","hits":15},{"value":"study guides","hits":11},{"value":"annotated bibliographies","hits":9},{"value":"learning modules","hits":6},{"value":"worksheets","hits":6},{"value":"slide shows","hits":4},{"value":"quizzes","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":40428},{"value":"StillImage","hits":35298},{"value":"MovingImage","hits":4529},{"value":"Sound","hits":3226},{"value":"Collection","hits":41},{"value":"InteractiveResource","hits":25}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"Peppler, Jim","hits":4965},{"value":"Phay, John E.","hits":4712},{"value":"University of Mississippi. Bureau of Educational Research","hits":4707},{"value":"Baldowski, Clifford H., 1917-1999","hits":2599},{"value":"Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission","hits":2255},{"value":"Thurmond, Strom, 1902-2003","hits":2077},{"value":"WSB-TV (Television station : Atlanta, Ga.)","hits":1475},{"value":"Newman, I. DeQuincey (Isaiah DeQuincey), 1911-1985","hits":1003},{"value":"The State Media Company (Columbia, S.C.)","hits":926},{"value":"Atlanta Journal-Constitution","hits":844},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":778}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"African Americans--Civil rights","hits":9445},{"value":"Civil rights","hits":8328},{"value":"African Americans","hits":5912},{"value":"Mississippi--Race relations","hits":5750},{"value":"Race relations","hits":5604},{"value":"Education, Secondary","hits":5083},{"value":"Education, Elementary","hits":4729},{"value":"Segregation in education--Mississippi","hits":4727},{"value":"Education--Pictorial works","hits":4707},{"value":"Civil rights demonstrations","hits":4440},{"value":"Civil rights workers","hits":3536}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966--Correspondence","hits":1888},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1815},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1709},{"value":"Baker, Augusta, 1911-1998","hits":1495},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1312},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1071},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":858},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":814},{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":719},{"value":"Mizell, M. Hayes","hits":674},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":626}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"name_authoritative_sms","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":2598},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1915},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1704},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1331},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1070},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":856},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":806},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":625},{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":605},{"value":"Snelling, Paula","hits":580},{"value":"Williams, Hosea, 1926-2000","hits":440}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Nobel Prize","hits":1769},{"value":"Ole Miss Integration","hits":1670},{"value":"Housing Act of 1961","hits":969},{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":853},{"value":"Memphis Sanitation Workers Strike","hits":366},{"value":"Selma-Montgomery March","hits":337},{"value":"Freedom Summer","hits":306},{"value":"Freedom Rides","hits":214},{"value":"Poor People's Campaign","hits":180},{"value":"University of Georgia Integration","hits":173},{"value":"University of Alabama Integration","hits":140}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":17987},{"value":"United States, Georgia, Fulton County, Atlanta, 33.749, -84.38798","hits":5437},{"value":"United States, Alabama, Montgomery County, Montgomery, 32.36681, -86.29997","hits":5151},{"value":"United States, Georgia, 32.75042, -83.50018","hits":4847},{"value":"United States, South Carolina, 34.00043, -81.00009","hits":4599},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":4328},{"value":"United States, Alabama, 32.75041, -86.75026","hits":3948},{"value":"United States, Mississippi, 32.75041, -89.75036","hits":2910},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":2580},{"value":"United States, Tennessee, Shelby County, Memphis, 35.14953, -90.04898","hits":2580},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":2536}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Georgia","hits":12823},{"value":"Alabama","hits":11313},{"value":"Mississippi","hits":10220},{"value":"South Carolina","hits":8493},{"value":"Arkansas","hits":4733},{"value":"Texas","hits":4399},{"value":"Tennessee","hits":3786},{"value":"Florida","hits":2602},{"value":"Ohio","hits":2403},{"value":"North Carolina","hits":1875},{"value":"New York","hits":1840}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1966","hits":10632},{"value":"1963","hits":10287},{"value":"1965","hits":10218},{"value":"1956","hits":9840},{"value":"1955","hits":9619},{"value":"1964","hits":9365},{"value":"1968","hits":9345},{"value":"1962","hits":9247},{"value":"1967","hits":8897},{"value":"1957","hits":8523},{"value":"1961","hits":8282},{"value":"1958","hits":8259},{"value":"1959","hits":8061},{"value":"1960","hits":7948},{"value":"1969","hits":7348},{"value":"1954","hits":7240},{"value":"1950","hits":7118},{"value":"1953","hits":6969},{"value":"1970","hits":6835},{"value":"1971","hits":6425},{"value":"1977","hits":6367},{"value":"1972","hits":6254},{"value":"1952","hits":6162},{"value":"1951","hits":6046},{"value":"1975","hits":5894},{"value":"1976","hits":5863},{"value":"1974","hits":5849},{"value":"1973","hits":5689},{"value":"1979","hits":5416},{"value":"1978","hits":5405},{"value":"1980","hits":5366},{"value":"1995","hits":4885},{"value":"1981","hits":4811},{"value":"1994","hits":4704},{"value":"1948","hits":4597},{"value":"1949","hits":4573},{"value":"1996","hits":4542},{"value":"1982","hits":4417},{"value":"1947","hits":4317},{"value":"1985","hits":4313},{"value":"1998","hits":4281},{"value":"1983","hits":4261},{"value":"1997","hits":4258},{"value":"1984","hits":4152},{"value":"1999","hits":4074},{"value":"1946","hits":4047},{"value":"1945","hits":4018},{"value":"1986","hits":4006},{"value":"1990","hits":3988},{"value":"1943","hits":3900},{"value":"1944","hits":3896},{"value":"2000","hits":3894},{"value":"2001","hits":3876},{"value":"1942","hits":3868},{"value":"1940","hits":3765},{"value":"1941","hits":3758},{"value":"1987","hits":3744},{"value":"2002","hits":3624},{"value":"1991","hits":3553},{"value":"1936","hits":3507},{"value":"1939","hits":3501},{"value":"1992","hits":3500},{"value":"2003","hits":3489},{"value":"1993","hits":3478},{"value":"1938","hits":3466},{"value":"1937","hits":3450},{"value":"1989","hits":3441},{"value":"1930","hits":3378},{"value":"1988","hits":3355},{"value":"1935","hits":3307},{"value":"1933","hits":3271},{"value":"1934","hits":3271},{"value":"1932","hits":3255},{"value":"1931","hits":3240},{"value":"2005","hits":3143},{"value":"2004","hits":2995},{"value":"2006","hits":2860},{"value":"1929","hits":2790},{"value":"1928","hits":2272},{"value":"1921","hits":2124},{"value":"1925","hits":2040},{"value":"1927","hits":2026},{"value":"1924","hits":2012},{"value":"2016","hits":2011},{"value":"1926","hits":2010},{"value":"1920","hits":1976},{"value":"1923","hits":1955},{"value":"1922","hits":1929},{"value":"2007","hits":1715},{"value":"2008","hits":1664},{"value":"2011","hits":1661},{"value":"2009","hits":1624},{"value":"2019","hits":1623},{"value":"2015","hits":1613},{"value":"2013","hits":1604},{"value":"2010","hits":1601},{"value":"2014","hits":1567},{"value":"2012","hits":1553},{"value":"1919","hits":1533},{"value":"1918","hits":1531}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"0193","max":"2035","count":506439,"missing":56},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"photographs","hits":10710},{"value":"correspondence","hits":9628},{"value":"black-and-white photographs","hits":7678},{"value":"negatives (photographs)","hits":7513},{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":4462},{"value":"letters (correspondence)","hits":3623},{"value":"oral histories (literary works)","hits":3607},{"value":"black-and-white negatives","hits":2771},{"value":"editorial cartoons","hits":2620},{"value":"newspapers","hits":1955},{"value":"manuscripts (documents)","hits":1692}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/","hits":41201},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":17721},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/UND/1.0/","hits":8830},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/","hits":7090},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/","hits":2186},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/","hits":1778},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-CR/1.0/","hits":1115},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","hits":145},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/","hits":60},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-RUU/1.0/","hits":51},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","hits":27}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Jim Peppler Southern Courier Photograph Collection","hits":4956},{"value":"John E. Phay Collection ","hits":4706},{"value":"John J. Herrera Papers","hits":3288},{"value":"Baldy Editorial Cartoons, 1946-1982, 1997: Clifford H. Baldowski Editorial Cartoons at the Richard B. Russell Library.","hits":2607},{"value":"Sovereignty Commission Online","hits":2335},{"value":"Strom Thurmond Collection, Mss 100","hits":2068},{"value":"Alabama Media Group Collection","hits":2067},{"value":"Black Trailblazers, Leaders, Activists, and Intellectuals in Cleveland","hits":2033},{"value":"Rosa Parks Papers","hits":1948},{"value":"Isaiah DeQuincey Newman, (1911-1985), Papers, 1929-2003","hits":1904},{"value":"Lillian Eugenia Smith Papers (circa 1920-1980)","hits":1887}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"John Davis Williams Library. Department of Archives and Special Collections","hits":8885},{"value":"Alabama. Department of Archives and History","hits":8153},{"value":"South Caroliniana Library","hits":4251},{"value":"Atlanta University Center Robert W. Woodruff Library","hits":4102},{"value":"University of North Texas. Libraries","hits":3854},{"value":"University of South Carolina. Libraries","hits":3438},{"value":"Hargrett Library","hits":3292},{"value":"Richard B. Russell Library for Political Research and Studies","hits":2874},{"value":"Mississippi. Department of Archives and History","hits":2825},{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":2785},{"value":"Rhodes College","hits":2264}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":81102},{"value":"Collection","hits":455}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":81360},{"value":"true","hits":197}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}