{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"noa_sohpcr_r-0019","title":"Oral history interview with James Slade, February 23, 1997","collection_id":"noa_sohpcr","collection_title":"Oral Histories of the American South: The Civil Rights Movement","dcterms_contributor":["Thomas, Karen Kruse","Slade, Catherine","Southern Oral History Program"],"dcterms_spatial":["United States, North Carolina, Chowan County, 36.12656, -76.60216","United States, North Carolina, Chowan County, Edenton, 36.05794, -76.60772"],"dcterms_creator":["Slade, James, 1930-"],"dc_date":["1997-02-23"],"dcterms_description":["James Slade was the second African American to attend medical school at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He started there in 1952, embracing the challenges and limitations of attending UNC-Chapel Hill, including one racist professor. Slade eventually decided to become a pediatrician: the specialty attracted warm-hearted doctors less prone to prejudice. He began private practice in Edenton, North Carolina, in 1965, where for many years he was the only black physician. In this interview, he recalls the gradual integration of medical practice in Edenton and describes his experiences as one of very few African American medical professionals in his area. Slade, who is joined by his wife, Catherine, focuses on the challenges of medical care at the intersection of race, poverty, and rural isolation. Poor patients, black and white, had a unique set of needs that Slade worked to serve despite limited access to medical technology and peers with whom to collaborate. As he did so, he earned the loyalty of a black community that in addition to its unique medical needs, such as treatment for diabetes and hypertension made unique demands of its doctor. Toward the end of this interview, Slade also describes some of the changes that have affected the business of medicine in the past few decades and his concerns about the health of the black community.","The Civil Rights Digital Library received support from a National Leadership Grant for Libraries awarded to the University of Georgia by the Institute of Museum and Library Services for the aggregation and enhancement of partner metadata."],"dc_format":["text/html","text/xml","audio/mpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":["Forms part of Oral histories of the American South collection."],"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["African American physicians--North Carolina--Edenton","Discrimination in medical care--North Carolina--Edenton","Poor--Medical care -North Carolina--Edenton","African Americans--Medical care--North Carolina--Edenton","Medically underserved areas--North Carolina--Edenton","Medical offices--Management"],"dcterms_title":["Oral history interview with James Slade, February 23, 1997"],"dcterms_type":["Text","Sound"],"dcterms_provenance":["University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Documenting the American South (Project)"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://docsouth.unc.edu/sohp/R-0019/menu.html"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["transcripts","sound recordings","oral histories (literary works)"],"dcterms_extent":["Title from menu page (viewed on Nov. 19, 2008).","Interview participants: James Slade, interviewee; Catherine Slade, interviewee; Karen Kruse Thomas interviewer.","Duration: 02:58:19.","This electronic edition is part of the UNC-Chapel Hill digital library, Documenting the American South. It is a part of the collection Oral histories of the American South.","Text encoded by Jennifer Joyner. Sound recordings digitized by Aaron Smithers."],"dlg_subject_personal":["Slade, James, 1930-","Slade, Catherine"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1203","title":"Exhibits: Pulaski County Special School District, monitoring reports","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1997-02-11/1997-07-17"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational law and legislation","Little Rock (Ark.). Office of Desegregation Monitoring","School integration"],"dcterms_title":["Exhibits: Pulaski County Special School District, monitoring reports"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1203"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["exhibition (associated concept)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nExhibit numbers 456-457\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nEXHIBITS 456 - 457     PULASKI COUNTY SPEGAL SCHOOL DISTRICT   OFFICE OF DFSEGREGATION FIRST SEMFSTER MONITORING REPORT FEBRUARY ll, 1997 RUIH SIMMONS HER: DIRECfOR OF DffiEGREGATIO I C EXHIBIT    INTRODUCTION ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS TABLE OF CONTENTS Adkins Elementary.............................. 1 Amo Id Drive Elementary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Baker Elementary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Daisy Bates Elementary .......................... 14 Bayou Meta Elementary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . 1 9 Cato Elementary ................................ 23 Clinton Elementary Magnet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 College Station Elementary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Crystal Hill Elementary Magnet. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 Warren Dupree Elementary ...................... 36 Fuller Elementary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 Harris Elementary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 Jacksonville Elementary .......................... 54 Landmark Elementary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 Lawson Elementary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 Oak Grove Elementary ........................... 66 Oakbrooke Elementary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 9 Pine Forest Elementary .......................... 73 Pinewood Elementary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 Robinson Elementary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 Scott Elementary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 5 Sherwood Elementary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 O Sylvan Hills Elementary ......................... 95 Murrell Taylor Elementary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 Tolleson Elementary ............................ 103 SECONDARY SCHOOLS Fuller Junior High ............................... 107 Jacksonville North Junior ........................ 112 Jacksonville South Junior ........................ 120 Jacksonville High ............................... 131 Mills University Studies High ..................... 136 North Pulaski High .............................. 142 Northwood Junior High .......................... 155 Oak Grove High . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 Robinson Junior High . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167 Robinson High .................................. 170 Sylvan Hills Junior High .......................... 181 Sylvan Hills High ............................... . 188 RESPONSE TO CONCERNS REGARDING FACILITIE ... 195 FOUR-YEAR COMPARISON ............................ 204    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING REPORT FIRST SEMESTER, 1996-97 The Office of Desegregation has the responsibility of monitoring and evaluating the desegregation progress of the Pulaski County Special School District. The Office of Desegregation is assisted in this process by biracial committees of parents and teachers in each school. Monitoring reports are submitted biannually to the superintendent and to the court via the Office of Desegregation Monitoring. The monitoring teams conduct one scheduled visit each semester. Prior to the first visit this school year, inservice training for the monitoring teams was conducted. The purpose of the training was to acquaint team members with their roles and responsibilities in monitoring and to clarify the concepts, equality and equity. Principals were also inserviced regarding the monitoring process. The Office of Desegregation, principals and monitoring teams work closely to coordinate the visits. teams: The following areas are monitored and evaluated by the monitoring 1.0 Separation by Race in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement/ Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous The monitoring team analyzes race and gender data which are submitted by each school in the form of the School Profile. The data are verified by the team at an entrance meeting with the principal and through interviews with school personnel. After the visit has been conducted, the team and principal have an exit meeting. The purpose of the exit meeting is to share information about the visit with the principal. If the team shares concerns regarding equity/desegregation issues, principals are to submit a written response to the team and the Office of Desegregation .    School Equity and Improvement Monitoring Report Page 2 The second semester monitoring report is a summary of the individual reports of thirty-seven schools in the District. The report identifies equity/desegregation issues and conditions that were evident on the day of the visit. Since the visit, principals were encouraged to address the equity/desegregation concerns. Therefore, current conditions may be different. NOTE: The principal's response(s) is attached to the team's report. For the sake of brevity, all positive observations have not been included. However, all concern responses have been included. ELEMENTARY ANALYSIS At the elementary level, there was a total of sixty-one possible responses on the monitoring instrument. The total number of responses received for the twenty-five elementary schools was 1,525. Of the total responses, 5 percent were responses of concern and 95 percent were positive responses. The concern responses were in the areas of separation by race in school programs, curriculum, student achievement, special education, talented and gifted, staff development, student discipline, building leadership/management and miscellaneous. All monitoring teams expressed concern about student achievement (e.g., the achievement disparity based on race). In comparison to the 1995-96 second semester monitoring report, the first semester monitoring report reflected improvement in some areas. Specific information will be discussed in the analysis section of each elementary school's report. Areas which remained concerns will also be discussed. SECONDARY ANALYSIS At the secondary level, there was a total of sixty-two possible responses on the monitoring instrument for the *twelve secondary schools. The total number of responses received for the twelve secondary schools was 7 44. Of the total responses, 13 percent were responses of concern and 87 percent were positive responses. The concern responses were in the areas of separation by race in school programs, curriculum, school/district initiated honors and awards, extracurricular, student achievement, special education, talented and gifted education, parental involvement, student discipline, building leadership/management and miscellaneous. All monitoring teams expressed concern about student achievement (e.g., the achievement disparity based on race). In comparison to the 1995-96 second semester monitoring report, the first semester monitoring report reflected improvement in some areas. Specific information will be discussed in the analysis section of each secondary school's report. Areas which remained concerns will also be discussed. *The Alternative Learning Center is not included in this report .    School Equity and Improvement Monitoring Report Page 3 RESPONSE TO CONCERNS REGARDING FACILITIES The report includes a response from the Maintenance Department regarding facilities. FOUR-YEAR COMPARISON The report includes a four-year comparison of the concern areas at each school. All concern areas are denoted by an X mark .  ELEMENTARY    ADKINS ELEMENTARY      Homer Adkins Elementary School 500 Cloverdale Road Jacksonville, AR Mr. Toney Abbott, Principal Positive Observations and Comments 2.3 All students are actively involved in classroom instruction. 2.4 Classroom seating patterns promote interaction among students of varying racial/ethnic backgrounds. 4.0 The school staff insures that appointments to all school based committees are made in a non-biased and equitable manner which results in committees that have knowledge of educational programs for a varied student population. 6.2 Goals and strategies are developed and implemented to decrease the achievement differences between black and white students. 7.2 Special education facilities are comparable to those of the campus in general. 9.1 The staff development activities related to educational equity have been provided. 10.3 Contact is made regularly with the home to communicate positive as well as negative information related to student behavior. 11.3 Classroom instruction proceeds in an orderly manner. 1.2 6.1 6.2 8.1 8.2 12.6 12.12 13.0 Concerns The school enrollment is not in compliance with the court order. There is an achievement disparity based on race. There are no goals and strategies implemented to decrease the achievement disparity. Software can not be purchased for the computers in the talented and gifted classrooms because the computers are outdated. The talented and gifted facilities are not comparable to those of the campus. There is graffiti on one of the doors. The campus is not clean and the restrooms have a strong odor. Many of the floors in the classrooms are dirty. A sink in one of the classrooms is dirty also. The guidance program does not provide equitable services to all students. These are the concerns regarding the facilities: The outside lighting is very dim. The entrance door to the media center should be replaced. The roof leaks in #400 building. There are holes and water stains in the ceiling tiles. In one of the classrooms, the tile has fallen . \\    Homer Adkins Elementary Page 2 The tile needs to be replaced in the outside restrooms. Cafeteria concerns: There are cobwebs and di rt in the corners. The blinds need to be replaced. The windows are not clean. There are mops and brooms left in the cafeteria. This adversely impacts the appearance of the cafeteria. The roof leaks. The walls need to be scrubbed and painted. ANALYSIS Of the sixty-one evaluation response items, 13 percent were responses of concern and 87 percent were positive responses. The concern responses were in the areas of separation by race in school programs, student achievement, talented and gifted, building leadership and miscellaneous. In comparison to last year's second semester report, there remained concerns in the areas of student achievement, talented and gifteq, building leadership and miscellaneous. There was improvement in the area of school/district initiated honors and awards. First Semester Monitoring Report, 1996-97   PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXl1 CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOLHomer Adkins Elem PRINCIPAL Toney Abbott VISIT OATEDeceml,er 11 1 1996TEAM CHAIRMelba Miller TEAM CO-CHAIR Anita Straw ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1 .o Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs  2.0 Curriculum 3.0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No. 1  2 Response The school rofrority enrollment continues to in~rease The sixth grade wiJJ be ma Ve d n e X t ye(\\ r t O the .,Ta Ck s a mti 1 J e M j d a 1 e s Cb O C 1 The enrollment ~dll be re-evaJnated at that time ~o see if changes in the attendance zone to the court. Assessment Area No. ______ Response ________________ _ 3   PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL Homer Adkins Eleril.PAINCIPAL Toney Abbott VISIT DATE Dec. 11, 1996 TEAM CHAIR Melba Miller TEAM CO-CHAIR Anita E,traw ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development ., 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No. 6  1 Response Part of our COE self study is being devoted to develop_i nt~_.: new st r a t e g 1 es ta reduce the disparity in test scores. Assessment Area No. 6. 2 Response Goals \u0026amp; Stratefies bave been developed. They ar e b ein g revis e d sjnce they baue not been successful in reducino t 0 est score disparity There is no disparity in grade distributjqp between races 4    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL Homer Adkins Elem, PRINCIPAL Toney Abbott VISIT DATE Dec. 11, 1996 TEAM CHAIR Melba Miller TEAM CO-CHAIR Anita Straw ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development ,, 10.0 Parental Involvement ' 11 .o Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No. 8 .1 Response Fundin~ has oat kept up pace with technology. The teacher is following the adopted curriculum. The lack of funds has ke_pt new equi p-ment from being purchased. Assessment Area No. _8_. 2_, __ Response Tax money purchased com-puters for the third and fonrth grade c]assrooros No J acrar e source of funding is available to purchase multjp]e coropnterg and programs . s    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL Horner Adkins Eler.i PRINCIPAL Toney Ahbar t VISIT DATE Dec. 11, 1996 TEAM CHAIR Melba Miller TEAM CO-CHAIR Anita straw ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 School/D1smct Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Statt Development 10.0 Parental Involvement , 11 .0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No. 12. 6 Response A work order has beeu called ln requesting the plexiglass in the ,Jaors be replaced. The custodians have been made aware pf the co~pJaint and will be monitored to see if the prph]em bas been correct9Q Assessment Area No. 12. 12 Response The district is now providing a substitute when the counselor bas to b9 absent ~~\u0026amp;U:lt S[g\n.f Principal b    Homer Adkins Elementary School \\ Principal's Response to items in area 13. 0 - Building Concerns. 500 CLOVERDALE ROAD JACKSONVILLE, ARKANSAS 72076 TELEPHONE (501) 982-3117 All items will be grouped into two areas: items which can be corrected at the local level\nand items which will need help through Central Office. Items which can be corrected at the local level will be given to Mr.Mitchell, Maintenance Custodian, with instructions to correct. Work orders will be secured for items which need district workers to correct. Richard Wilkerson, Don Stewart, or Jerry Holder will be contacted for advice on correcting items which require special funding or policy clarification . A SCHOOL OF THE PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 1  ARNOLD DRIVE ELEMENTARY       Arnold Drive Elementary School 798 Arnold Drive Jacksonville, AR Mr. Doug Newkirk, Principal Positive Observations and Comments 2.3 There was evidence of active student participation in all classes visited. 3.2 Procedures are evident to insure that students are apprised of requirements governing honors and awards. 5.0 There is a fair and equitable plan of involvement for extracurricular activities in the school. 6.2 Goals and strategies are developed and implemented to decrease the achievement differences between black and white students. 9.1 There is documented evidence of well-planned staff development activities available throughout the year for the entire staff. 12.1 The school staff and District have clear concise goals as far as the educational equity and monitoring programs. Concerns 6.1 There is an achievement disparity based on race. 12.6 The restrooms are not clean . 13.0 The parking lot should be repaired. There are potholes in many areas. The ceiling panels in the east bathroom and classrooms (11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17) are split and have holes. These panels should be replaced. This is the third time the Monitoring Team has reported this concern. The tiles should be replaced in the cafeteria. The lights should be replaced in the media center. Also, the media center needs more space for audio visual equipment and computers. The panel around the pencil sharpener should be replaced in classrooms 13, 15, 18, 19 and 20. The light coverings in classrooms 1,3, 10, 11, 12, 14 and 18 are broken and hanging down. The socket cover is not in the multipurpose room. The brackets are loose in the vent and there is soot around the vent.  Arnold Drive Elementary Page 2 The lights in the Teachers' Lounge should be replaced. The screens are missing in two classrooms. The door in the boys' restroom is broken. The Monitoring Team suggests that the space on the north side of the school be used for a parking lot. If a new parking lot is built in this area, it would alleviate the congestion at the front entrance. ANALYSIS Of the sixty-one evaluation response items, 5 percent were responses of concern and 95 percent were positive responses. The concern responses were in the areas of student achievement, building leadership and miscellaneous. In comparison to last year's second semester report, the areas mentioned above remained concerns. There was, however, improvement in the area of special education.  First Semester Monitoring Report, 1996-97     PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL Arnold Dr. Elem. PRINCIPAL Doug Newkirk VISIT DATE lZ/l0/96 TEAM CHAIR Faye Presley TEAM CO-CHAIR Beverly Ward ASSESSMENT AREAS: . 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 SchooVOistrict Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous  Assessment Area No. 6. 1 Response ___________ _ Team learning and TESA techniques are being used in the classroom to help eliminate the disparity in test scores. Assessment Area No. ____ Response ___________ _ Signature of Principal \\0    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY ANO IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL Arnold Drive Elem. VISIT DATE 12/l0/96 P RINCIPAL _D o_u_ g__ N_e_wki_._r_k ____ TEAM CHAIR Faye Presley TEAM CO-CHAI R __ Be_v_er_l_y_w_a_r_d _ _ ASSESSMENT AREAS: . 1 .o Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No. _ 1_2__6_ Response ___________ _ Restrooms are cleaned daily and extra help is not needed. 13.0 Assessment Area No. ____ Response ___________ _ Many of the concerns will be taken care of locally, some already have pending districtmaintenance \"work-orders\", and others are \"capitol outlay\" projects . ~of Principal \\ \\  BAKER ELEMENTARY      Baker Elementary School 15001 Kanis Road Little Rock, AR Ms. Ila Newberry, Principal Positive Observations and Comments 1.2 School enrollment reflects the racial/ethnic composition prescribed by the court order. 2.2 Portfolios, which give information about students' performance, are kept in each classroom. 2.3 Students were on-task (i.e., working in groups and working on individual assignments). 2.5.1 The posters, brochures and books in the school reflect the multicultural curriculum. 2.4 Classroom seating patterns promote interaction among students of varying racial/ethnic backgrounds. 3.2 Procedures are evident to insure that students are apprised of requirements governing honors and awards. 4.0 The school staff insures that appointments to all school based committees are made in a non-biased and equitable manner which results in committees that have knowledge of educational 5.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 12.3 12.12 12.14 programs for a varied student population. Participation in extracurricular activities generally reflects the school population. All identifiable groups of parents are actively involved in school functions and are working me,mbers of groups (PTA, PTO, PALS, School Equity and Improvement, Principal's Advisory, etc.). The Home School Counselor assists the school in the area of parental involvement. Teachers do make phone calls to parents to discuss student behavior. The school has an effective home/school communication program. The guidance program is available to all students. Teachers are encouraged to use African-American resource speakers each semester. Concerns 6.1 There is an achievement disparity based on race. ANALYSIS Of the sixty-one evaluation response items, 2 percent were responses of concern and 98 percent were positive responses. The concern response was in the area of student achievement. In comparison to last year's second semester report, concern remained in the area of student achievement. First Semester Monitoring Report, 1996-97 .    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL \u0026amp;k:Pr El~1\n-i0ntr1r.v PRINCIPAL t1 -~ NewbP.rrv VISIT DA TE 12-12-9h TEAM CHAIR C:onni.0 Phi.Hin!=: TEAM CO-CHAIR ~11hv Tfashi.'1gton ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No. r-,. 1 Response Tenchcrs work to r.ieet i.nrl i virlual needs and learning styles hy usin~ PET, TESA rmci cooper\n:itive lenrni.n~.  A tutorcil prograri h~fore, nfter r1nd during ~chool. is provicier1 tn Assist students needi.ng more help. Assessment Area No. ____ Response ___________ _ ( . 'l ,V~/)~Vdl\nJ: (. \\ ~ Sign~~ of PrincipaIX' '--'  BATES ELEMENTARY      2.4 2.5.1 3.2 4.0 6.2 9.4 12.3 Daisy Bates Elementary 7000 Murray Street Little Rock, AR Ms. Sue Martin, Principal Positive Observations and Comments Classroom seating patterns promote interaction among students of varying racial/ethnic backgrounds. Bulletin boards, publications and productions throughout the school (including the media center) reflect the racial/ethnic and gender differences of the student body. Procedures are evident to insure that students are apprised of requirements governing honors and awards. The school staff insures that appointments to all school based committees are made in a non-biased and equitable manner which results in committees that have knowledge of educational programs for a varied student population. Goals and strategies are developed and implemented to decrease the achievement differences between black and white students. Staff development activities related to effective strategies to enhance the achievement of a diverse student population have been provided. The school has an effective home/school communication program. Concerns 1.2 The school enrollment does not reflect the racial composition prescribed by the court order. 2.1 The teachers need more VCRs, filmstrips, reading book sets, encyclopedias, reference materials, pencil sharpeners, world maps, globes and a transparency machine. These concerns have been reported several times. 6.1 There is an achievement disparity based on race. 7.1 The special education classrooms do not have adequate materials. 9.3 Staff development activities are not focused on multicultural teaching strategies. 11.2 More African-American students, especially females, are being disciplined than white students .    Daisy Bates Elementary Page 2 12.11 There are no strategies to increase the number of African-American students in the advanced courses. 13.0 The electrical wiring is old and faulty. The Team is concerned about the possibility of an electrical fire. The lights flicker continuously in the building. This concern has been cited several times. There are cracks in the first grade hallway wall. Rodents are in the school. ANALYSIS Of the sixty-one evaluation response items, approximately 13 percent were responses of concern and 87 percent were positive responses. The concern responses were in the areas of separation by race in school programs, curriculum, student achievement, special education, staff development, student discipline, building leadership and miscellaneous. In comparison to last year's second semester report, there remained concerns about the areas of separation by race in school programs, curriculum, student achievement, special education, staff development, student discipline and miscellaneous. First Semester Monitoring Report, 1996-97 \\S    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL Daisy Bates EL:m. PRINCIPAL Sue s. Martin VISIT DATE 12/12/96 TEAM CHAIR- E-ss-ie -Ne-al ------ TEAM CO-CHAIR ASSESSMENT AREAS: I --------- 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7. 0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No. _2_.1 __ Response With Central Offices' s help on increasing our instructional budget, school fund~ajsers, and/or Title I monies, more materials and equipnent can be purchased for our teachers' and students' usage. In February, 1997, a World Book Encyclopedia tuTidraiser/ reading incentive will begin\nclassroom sets of encyclopedias will be the rewards for reaching goals. Assessment Area No. _7_.1_ __ Response Teachers will be asked what type materials and equipnent are needed. With Supervisor's and Central Office's help,. the principal will work with special agencies to get requested special education teachers need . f Signature of rincipal lb    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING. TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL 1'\u0026lt;J.isy Bates Zlem. PRINCIPAL Sue s. Martin VISIT DATE -1-211-219-6 ----TEAM CHAIR -E-ss-ie -Ne-al ------ TEAM COCHAIR ______ _ ASSESSMENT AREAS: I 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 SchooVDistrict Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7. O Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No. _9_. 3 __ Response With TAC' s help, staff development activitie~ in teaching strategies will be addressed second semester in a faculty meeting. Assessment Area No. _1_1_.2_ __ Response The disparity in black/white female suspension and discipline will be addressed in a Yolll'lg Ladies and also also a Young Gentler.1en's Club for our students. The discipline of black/white males reflects the ration make-up of our school (54% black to 46% white) Signature ~Principal \\ \\    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL Daisy Bates Elem. PRINCIPAL Sue S. Martin VISIT DATE__\n.1\n..:2/...\n1.\n.2.\n...\n/9....\n.6 ___ TEAM CHAIR Essie Neal ASSESSMENT AREAS: TEA~ CO-CHAIR ______ _ 1 .o Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7. O Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No. _1 _3_-0 __ Response The building facility repairs are monitored.and maintained with Central Office's maintenancw help as we]] as local custodial help. The principal has been assured and has assured staff of frequent monitoring of the facility as to the particular recurring cormnents highlighted in this 13.0 section. Central Office will be asked to issue~ report on the condition of wiring, ventilation and cracks. Through the district's maintenance department, an exterminator is called\nregular servicing in this A\"eoo~ent Area ~,G. ____ Aespen6'f ____________ _ area will be addressed . Signature of ri~  BAYOU METO ELEMENTARY      Bayou Mato Elementary School Route 2, Box 200 Jacksonville, AR Ms. Judy Quillen, Principal Positive Observations and Comments 2.1 In classrooms observed, the teachers have adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum. 2.5.1 Bulletin boards and displays reflect the racial/ethnic and gender differences of the student body. 3.2 Procedures are evident to insure that students are apprised of requirements governing honors and awards. 4.0 The school staff insures that appointments to all school based committees are made in a non-biased and equitable manner which results in committees that have knowledge of educational 5.0 9.1 10.1 10.3 11.2 12.2 12.3 12.7 programs for a varied student population. Participation in extracurricular activities generally reflects the school population. Staff development activities related to educational equity have been provided. All identifiable groups of parents are actively involved in school functions and are working members of groups (PTA, PTO, PALS, School Equity and Improvement, Principal's Advisory, etc.). Contact is made regularly with the home to communicate positive as well as negative information related to student behavior. Suspension and expulsion rates are generally representative of the student population. The school has appropriate strategies for attaining improvement goals. The school has an effective home/school communication program (i.e., memos, home visits, phone calls, parent/teacher conferences etc.). Students enter and exit the building in an orderly manner. Concerns 6.1 There is an achievement disparity based on race. 8.2 A classroom is needed for the Talented and Gifted Program. The students in the program have class on the stage in the cafeteria. 13.0 There are many holes in the parking lot. There is a water drainage problem in the front driveway .    Bayou Meto Elementary School Page 2 ANALYSIS Of the sixty-one evaluation response items, 5 percent were responses of concern and 95 percent were positive responses. The concern responses were in the areas of student achievement, talented and gifted and miscellaneous. In comparison to last year's second semester report, there remained concerns about student achievement, talented and gifted and miscellaneous. First Semester Monitoring Report, 1996-97    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOLBayou Meta Elem. VISIT DATE 12/ 11 /96 ASSESSMENT AREAS: PRINCIPAL Judy Quillen TEAM CHAIR Mary Alice Jones TEAM COCHAIR Alex Lambert 1 .0 Separation by Race1Genaer In School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 School/O1strc: Initiated Honers and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extrac:..imc:.J ,ar Activ1t:es 6.0 Student Acnievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11 .0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leacersh1p, Management 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No. --=1-=-.:::\n.s_ Response _____________ _ Bayou Meta has been declared by the court as an isolated urea. Assessment Area No. __6_ .o _ Respcnsa ____________ Disparity is c\nIJ(.Li.~ui..t_to_ assess when compa ri og 98% to 2%. ---------------------- ---------- ----     PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL Bayou Meto Elem. PRINCIPAL Judy Quillen VISIT DATE __1_ _ _2 ....,/ _1_ __1 .....,_/ 9_.. ...,6 __T EAM CHAIR Mary Alice Jones TEAM COCHAIR Al2x Lambert ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1.0 Separation oy Race1Genaer in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 Scnool/01strc Initiated Honers and Awarcs 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracumc~1ar Activmes 6.0 Student Acniever.ient Assessment 7.0 Special Edwcation 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Disc:pline 12.0 Building Leacership1Management 1 3.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No. 8. 2 Response _____________ _ At this time Aloha roests oo tb~ stage are replaced, Alpha will have space provided in that nw f:1cility. -------- ------- -- Assessment Area No. __1_ 3_._o_ Respcnse ____________ Wh~n the construction is cl?mpl2te, the drainage oroblem _ and parking lot problem will he corrected. The maintenance d2partment has 3lready agr22d to that .  CATO ELEMENTARY      Cato Elementary School 2901 Cato Road North Little Rock, AR Dr. Linda Remele, Principal Positive Observations and Concerns 1.4 A diverse group of students participate in the Math Olympiad Program and Odyssey of the Mind. 2.1 In classrooms observed, the teachers have adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum. 2.5.4 A multicultural curriculum guide is located in the media center. 3.2 Procedures are evident to insure that students are apprised of requirements governing honors and awards. 4.0 The school staff insures that appointments to all school based committees are made in a non-biased and equitable manner which results in committees that have knowledge of educational programs 8.1 9.2 10.2 10.4 11.5 12.6 12.10 for a varied student population. In talented and gifted classrooms observed, the teachers have adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum. Staff development activities related to equitable staffing practices have been provided. The school utilizes various methods (i.e., correspondence, a school wide message service, phone calls, parent-teacher conferences and orientation) to encourage parental involvement. Contact is made regularly with the home to communicate positive as well as negative information related to student achievement. Strategies to eliminate disproportionate discipline sanctions among identifiable student groups are evident. The campus and building are clean. There is evidence that curriculum monitoring occurs. Concerns 6.1 There is an achievement disparity based on race. 13.0 The vent should be checked in the smoking Teachers' Lounge. The sinks in the third grade and fourth grade restrooms squeak and do not work properly. The ceiling air vents need to be dusted. Some floor tile is missing in the cafeteria. The storage area near the cafeteria should be caulked .    Cato Elementary Page 2 ANALYSIS Of the sixty-one evaluation response items, 3 percent were areas of concern and 98 percent were positive responses. The concern responses were in the areas of student achievement and miscellaneous. In comparison to last year's second semester report, the area of student achievement remained a concern. First Semester Monitoring Report, 1996-97    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXJT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL Ca-to Eleme.n.talty VISIT DATE Nov. 12, 7996 ASSESSMENT AREAS: PRINCIPAL V1t. Unda Reme.le. TEAM CHAIR Ve.YUJ.\u0026gt;e. Ja.ke1, TEAM CO-CHAIR Sha.1ton Re.gnM 1 .0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No. _6 _. 1 __ Response Ca.to c.ontlnuu to u.tilize. the. T-\u0026lt;-fte. 1 pMgJtam, Tut Ready ,i,n Re.adlng and Ma.th, Jol.)te.n Le.a.Jl.ning CompU- te.M, and c.ou.n6e.lo1t dute.c.te.d tut--6t/tUI.) lUl.)Onl.) to 1tedu.c.e. the. tut d,[l.)pcvuty. Th.,u., ye.a.IL Cato ha.6 h,i,Jte.d a T-\u0026lt;-fte. 1 Language. Aft.:t6 te.a.c.heJt to he.lp 1.,tu.de.nt.6 ,fo the. bottom qua.l[\ntil_e. to hnpMve. Jte.acU.ng -6 full6 . The. d,[l.)tJt,i,e,t hM a.l6 o pMv,i,de.d Cato wilh the. Tut Re.a.dy p1togJtam ,ln Sue.nee. tita.:t we. wUi. U6 e. tnM SpJt,i,ng and ne.xt Fall to he.lp JtaA.,J., e. -~ ue.nc.e tut -6 c.01tu. Assessment Area No. 13. o Response __________ _ Ce.n:tltal 06 6,lee ma..inte.na.nc.e. ,i,nvuligated the ve~on in the -6mokeJt' -6 lounge. wt f:Je.a.Jt. The.y 6e.U U WM pMpeJtly ventilated. The g1toup l.),i,nfu ouu,i,de. 06 the. 3/ 4 and 5/6 bathltoomJ., a.Jte. a ma.jolt no,t,!,e, a\u0026lt;actoJt, 1 will, attac.hme.nt. )    A:tta.chme.n:t 601t.. AMU.6me.nt Aile.a No. 13. 0 ( c.onlinue.d) The. c.UL:,.todla.n and 1 have. lle.po!ite.d the. leaky Jtoo6. Re.plac.-i.ng c.ei.Li.ng ti.1.eo .6eem6 6u.:tile. ( and e.xpe.n.6ive.) u.n-ti.,i the. Jtoo6 ~ ILe.pa.iJ,.e.d. The. c.u..6:t.o cLo.\n,,n mu ILe.pa.iJ,.e.d the. gap in the 6lo OIL til.u in the. c.a.6 e.:teJt.ia. The. c.ollk.boa!Ul .6W.p-\u0026amp; wi.U be. inveotiga.:te.d to add mo1t..e. d,U,play Me.a .to c.la.6.61t..oom6. 1 wi.U ea.Le. maintenanc.e. and lle.po!it the. -6pac.e. in the wall .     CLINTON INTERDISTRICT ELEMENTARY    1.2 1.3 1.5 2.3 2.4 2.5.2 3.1 3.4 5.0 7.1 8.1 9.3 10.1 12.3 12.14 William Jefferson Clinton Magnet Elementary 142 Hollywood Avenue Sherwood, AR 72120 Ms. Jackye Parker, Principal Positive Observations and Comments School enrollment reflects the racial/ethnic composition prescribed by the court order. Class/course enrollments generally reflect the racial/ethnic composition of the school. There are no one-race classes. All students are actively involved in classroom instruction. Classroom seating patterns promote interaction among students of varying racial/ethnic backgrounds. There is a variety of displays in the classrooms. The school uses awards such as good citizens, superstars, attendance and honor roll. The School Equity and Improvement Committee evaluates the honors and awards procedures regularly. The extracurricular groups (e.g., safety patrol and media helpers) reflect the school population. In special education classrooms observed, the teachers have adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum. In talented and gifted classrooms observed, the teachers have adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum. Staff development activities in teaching strategies for multicultural curriculum delivery have been provided. A diverse group of parents are actively involved at the school. The school has an effective home/school communication program. African-American resource speakers are invited to speak to students. Concerns 6.1 There is an achievement disparity based on race. 11.2 The suspension and expulsion rates are disproportionate based on race. 13.0 The exterior doors are very heavy. Several students have been injured as a result of the doors closing too quickly. The monitoring team recommends that pneumatic closures be installed on the exterior doors .    William Jefferson Clinton Magnet Elementary Page 2 ANALYSIS Of the sixty-one evaluation response items, 5 percent were areas of concern and 95 percent were positive responses. The concern responses were in the areas of student achievement, student discipline and miscellaneous. In comparison to last year's second semester report, there remained concerns about student achievement, student discipline and miscellaneous. First Monitoring Report, 1996-97    PULASKI COUNTY SPECJAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL Clinton Elementary PRINCIPAL Jackye Parker VISIT DATE- -11--12-- 96- ----TEAM CHAIR Nikki Johnson TE AM CO-CHAIR Sharon r-t.Cormack ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5. O Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7. o Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No. 6 .1 Response The achievement disparity based on race is a concern that we continue to address through our C.O.E. plan, teacher t~aining, and discipline management plan. Through our C.Q.E. plan, each nine weeks students receive rakens for achievement in roarh raading and science Dm::i\nas thg later part of the second semester, students will have the ~pportunity to participate in a Math/ Science Fair. These activities are designed to encourage students desire to achieve in these areas. Teachers have recently completed or are currently participating in K through 4 Crusades, Multicultural Reading and Thinking (M:.Rat), and various inservice activities presented by staff development focusing on human diversity. Teachers also share insightful infonnation through team teaching activities, grade 1:evel plarmiug activities, faculty meetings, and E nail. 'feachers corrtirme Assessment Area No. __6_ .1_ _ Response ( continued from above) to acgyire knowledge to help them become more effective teachers, Through the discipline plan students are made aware of behavior expectations with emphasis on staying on task . . ,., 31gnatur6 of Principal    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL Clinton Elementary PRINCJPAL._J_a_ck...\n.y_e_Par_k_e_r ____ _ VISIT DATE -1-1--12--96- ----TEAM CHAIR Nikki Johnson TEAM CO-CHAIR Sharon ti:.Cormack ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 SchooVDistrid Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Adivities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7. O SpeciaJ Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessmenl Area No.11. 2 R~sponse While the numbers of students re:-eiving ous reterra s, oiscipliue referraTs, suspE::usions, etc. ate nae teptt!sentative of the student population, they do reflect actual incidents occuring where disciplinary action was deemed necessary. All faculty and staff are diligent in their effort to maintain an atmosphere where learning can take place. Inappropriate behavior by stuaents tMt .tffipe\u0026lt;1es out edueatlonal goals w111 not be allowed. Coimiunication efforts with parents to develop a better two-pronged approach to helping students interact positively at school will continue. Implementation of conflict resolution activities w:i th our srudenrs bas been successtuJ am wi 11 continJJa to be employed. Assessment Area No. _1_3 o. _ __ Response_ _Me m_o_r_a_nd_um _s_ en_t_b_y_p_r_i_n_c_ipa_l_to Ed Hogan, Assistant Superintetfdent for Support Services on April 24~ 1996 entitled Maintaining a Safe Environment. Related documentation has been sent to Central Office and should be on file in Mr. Ed Hogan's office and the Office of Desegregation . . ,., Signature of Principal  COLLEGE STATION ELEMENTARY      College Station Elementary School 471 O Frazier Pike College Station, AR Mr. Robert Evans, Principal Positive Observations and Comments 2.1 In classrooms observed, the teachers have adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum. 2.2 All teachers keep records of achievement in several ways. 2.3 All students are actively involved in classroom instruction. 2.5.2 Visual materials in the classrooms reflect the racial and gender composition of the school. 2.5.3 Student work is displayed throughout the school. 3.2 Procedures are evident to insure that students are apprised of requirements governing honors and awards. 4.0 The school staff insures that appointments to all school based committees are made in a non-biased and equitable manner which results in committees that have knowledge of educational 7.1 8.1 10.4 11.3 12.7 12.14 programs for a varied student population. The special education classroom has adequate materials to promote and encourage student learning. In talented and gifted classrooms observed, the teachers have adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum. Contact is made regularly with the home to communicate positive as well as negative information related to student achievement. Classroom instruction proceeds in an orderly manner. Students move from one classroom to the next in an orderly manner. African American resource speakers are invited to talk to students on a regular basis. Concerns 6.1 There is an achievement disparity based on race. ANALYSIS Of the sixty-one evaluation response items, 2 percent were responses of concern and 98 percent were positive responses. The concern response was in the area of student achievement. In comparison to last year's second semester report, this report reflected that there remained concern about student achievement. First Semester Monitoring Report, 1996-97    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL College 8tation PRINCIPAL Robert A. Evans VISIT DATE November 1 TEAM CHAIR._ _.. ..\nF_,\nr\n..\n:a..:.n~c_.e....,s_.....A_1. _1,. . ..s.. .a. . .o. ___ TEAM CO-CHAIR _ B_e_t_h_D_a_r_r _ _ ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No. __6_ _1_ Response ____________ The achievement disparity based on race will be resaJved by having inservice training on lear n1 ng s t y1e s, problem solving, thinking skills, test skills, and monitor student progress Assessment Area No. ____ Response ___________ _  CRYSTAL HILL ELEMENT ARY       1.2 1.3 2.3 2.4 3.1 3.4 5.0 7.1 8.1 9.3 11.5 12.14 Crystal Hill Elementary Magnet School 5001 Doyle Venable Road North Little Rock, AR 72118 Ms. Wanda Ruffins, Principal Positive Observations and Comments School enrollment reflects the racial/ethnic composition prescribed by the court order. Class/course enrollments generally reflect the racial/ethnic composition of the school. All students are actively involved in classroom instruction. Classroom seating patterns promote interaction among students of varying racial/ethnic backgrounds. The school uses awards such as good citizens, superstars, ambassadors, BUG Club, attendance and honor roll. The School Equity and Improvement Committee evaluates the honors and awards procedures regularly. The extracurricular groups (e.g., safety patrol, Stamp Club and media helpers) reflect the school population. In special education classrooms observed, the teachers have adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum. In talented and gifted classrooms observed, the teachers have adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum . Staff development activities in teaching strategies for multicultural curriculum delivery have been provided. A Peace Patrol has been established as a strategy to decrease the discipline disproportionality. African-American resource speakers are invited to speak to students. Concerns 6.1 There is an achievement disparity based on race. 11.2 The suspension and expulsion rates are not representative of the student population. 13.0 The heating and cooling system needs to be checked because the building temperature is either too warm or too cool. ANALYSIS Of the sixty-one evaluation responses, 5 percent were responses of concern and 95 percent were positive responses. The concern responses were in areas of student achievement, student discipline and miscellaneous. In comparison to last year's second semester report, there remained concerns about the areas of student achievement, student discipline and miscellaneous. First Semester Monitoring Report, 1996-97 33    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL Crystal Hill Elem. P RINCIPAL. __W ....\n.an da R_uf_f_i_n_s ___ VISIT DATE ________ TEAM CHAIR Janet Goodwin TEAM CO-CHAIR Linda Dunn ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No. 6.1 Response ___________ _ - The staff at Crystal Hill Elementa\ncy will use a variety of reaching tecbniques to make sure all students are provided equal access to the learning. S9!JlPle test booklets will be ordered for students in grades three through six. Teachers will incorperate specific skills from test as part of their daily objectives for the second semester. Independent reading activities will be a primary focus for the school year. Assessment Area No. ____ Response __________ _ /    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL Crystal Hill El em PRINCIPAL Wanda Ruffins VISIT DATE ________ TEAM CHAIR Janet Goodwin TEAM CO-CHAIR Linda Dunn ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No. 11, 2 Response The eXP3,1lsi on aod svspeosj on rates are not representative of tbA student population but the overall number of suspensions are down and no one has been ex\npeJJed fram Crystal Hill. Assessment Area No. 13. o Response ___________ _ Verbal or written ccmplaints are handled promptly by the custodians concerning heat or air conditioning .  WARREN DUPREE ELEMENTARY      1.2 1.3 2.1 2.3 2.5.2 3.1 3.2 4.0 6.2 7.1 7.6 9.1 10.4 Warren Dupree Elementary School 700 Gregory Street Jacksonville, AR Mr. Melvin Goodrum, Principal Positive Observations and Comments School enrollment reflects the racial/ethnic composition prescribed by the court order. The classroom racial percentage reflects the percentage of the school. Observation reveals that each classroom has sufficient materials and equipment to master the content. Learning opportunities were provided for all students. Group and individualized instruction were observed. Hands-on activities and learning center activities were also observed. Displays and bulletin boards in the classrooms reflect the racial and gender composition of the school. The Awards Committee, consisting of faculty, PTA and parents, insures that a variety of awards, rewards and recognition is provided. The Awards Committee established guidelines and procedures for governing honors and awards . All committees have a racial composition that reflects the student population. Goals and objectives were developed by the Biracial Equity Planning Committee for SAT-8 to decrease disparity between black and white students. The special education classrooms have adequate textbooks, materials and equipment. Interviews and documented evidence verify that there is an IEP Committee which reviews and monitors the student exit process. The District's staff development department has designed and implemented programs to provide appropriate learning related to educational equity. Contact is made regularly with the home to communicate positive as well as negative information related to student achievement. This is accomplished via telephone, personal contact, student work, happy grams, memos and the awards program. 12.8 The office staff is friendly and readily accessible to offer assistance to parents and faculty .    Warren Dupree Elementary Page 2 Concerns 6.1 There is an achievement disparity based on race. 13.0 The removal of the Plexiglas has not been completed (i.e., entry way and Teachers' Lounge). The front doors need to be replaced. The classrooms located away from the main building need to be repaired. Sidewalks should be built which extend from the kindergarten complex to the playground. ANALYSIS Of the sixty-one evaluation response items, 3 percent were responses of concern and 97 percent were positive responses. The concern responses were in the areas of student achievement and miscellaneous. In comparison to last year's second semester report, there remained concerns about student achievement and miscellaneous . First Semester Monitoring Report, 1996-97 31    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION - SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT  MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL.'S RESPONSE SCHOOL\\Harren Duoree F.Je. :-PRINCIPAL Melvin Gnnr1 r11.m VISIT DATE November 26, l 996_TEAM CHAIR Terrie Milligan TEAM CO-CHAIR Lesonia Brown ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management Assessment Area No. __ 6__1_ Response 'Ihe School Equity and Improvement Ccmn.i ttee developed goals and objectives for the Stanford -\nchievA\"nP.nt. 'T'P.~t. to decrease disparity bebJeen black and white students. Strategies and activities have been developed and are being irnplare1ted to decrease the disparity between black and white students. See attachr.ent A for listing of strategies and activities. Assessment Area No. 13. o (a) Response The principal rret with the maintenance custc:xlian, discussed the School Equity and Improvement Monitoring report, toured the ruilding and grounds to identify and assess the areas/items of concem. Plans have been rrade and are being .implemented to rerredy the areas of concem. 13  0 (b) A rreedco habys been sent to Mr. F.d Hasan Noti fving him of this area of concern rerort _ the :on1toring ~eamo .:\u0026gt;ee attaclirefit B ~~-~ 3 g ~ gnafure of Principal    RE: Educatia,al Equity M:nitoring Assanent Area No. 6.1 Page 11 Strategies and Activities Warren D..lpree Elerer. tacy Attaci'm:!nt A 1. -\n.dentify and provide remedial. help to students we need help in mastering basic skills 2. Olapter I Ptogtam 3. RIF ( Peading is Fundamental) Grade Fo.ir 4. TE.SA s. PET 6 . Parent Involvement Program 7. Team Teaching 8. Cooperatj.ve Leaming 9. Awards, Pswards, ~ognition Program 10. Continue to attend Staff Developnent/I~service to keep abreast:6f current trend(s) in educaticn and the -:.eveloprent of rraterials and strategies for neeting the education :-.eeds of all students  39    Warren Dupree Elementary School 700 Gregory Street Jacksonville, Arkansas 72076 Phone: 982-9541 Melvin Goodrum, Principal TO: Dr. Ruth Simmons Herts, Director of Desegregation FROM:~Melvin Goodrum, Principal SUBJ~CT: Response to School Equity and Improvement Monitoring Team Repor~ (Miscellaneous 13.0) Multipurpose Roon DATE: January 7, 1997 Act #236, passed by the General Assembly in 1991, calls for curriculum changes in our schools that emphasize teaching students to think. The law requires that educators and education systems adopt methods to ensure student mastery of challenging curriculum. The close proximity of the classroom areas with limited mobility of students has always been a concern to me. With the implementation of new State Standards, team learning, math manipulatives, hands-on activities, and oral communication skills, this concern has intensified. A ~ultipurpose_room. would afford the students the opportunity to reach their optimum in these areas. I support tne recommendation the School Equity and Monitoring Team has proposed for a multipurpose room. C: Mr. Bobby Lester, Superintendent Billy Bowles, Assistant Superintendent Desegregation Sarah Womble, Director Elementary Education Mr. Ed Hogan Assistant Superintendent support Services 4-0    Warren Dupree Elementary School 700 Gregory Street Jacksonville, Arkansas 72076 Phone: 982-9541 Melvin Goodrum, Principal MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. Ed Hogan, Assistant Superintendent Support Services FROM=/411 Melvin Goodrum, Principal SUBJECT: School Equity and Improvement Monitoring Report DATE: January 7, 1997 Attached is the School Equity and Improvement Monitoring Team report (Miscellaneous 13.0). This area of concern is not a project that can be handled at local level. Therefore, I am asking for your assistance . Contact me so we can discuss this matter further. Thank You. c: Mr. Bobby Lester, Superintendent Billy Bowles, Assistant Superintendent Desegregation Sara Womble, Director Elementary Ecucation DrJ Ruth Herts, Director Desegregrltinn 4\\    Warren DuQree Elementary School 700 Gregory Street Jacksonville,AR 72076 Helvin Goodrum, Principal Mr. Ed Hogan, Assistant Superintendent for Support Pulaski County Special School District 900 Dixon Road Little Rock, AR 72209 Dear Mr. Hogan: 982-9541 We at Barren Dupree Elementary School, take great pride in the fact that we offer all children the best education possible, in spite of adverse conditions. The population of 441 students, 38 faculty and staff personel,paraprofessionals, and innumerable community volunteers continuously strive to excel. Because our school is totally open space, our students have an additional obstacle to conquer. Their imaginations are being stifled simply because they _are constantly being directed to be quite. A multi-purpose room of considerable size would be of great assistance in alleviating some of that problem. The most recent reply from you to the School Equity and Improvement Committee, stated that all of the open spaced schools share that problem . Believe that we are empathetic to that fact, but we wish to remind you that the other schools were specifically designed to be open spaced, while our school was not. In addition, I wish to bring it to your attention that the cafetorium can not be utilized to any great extent because breakfast is served until 8:00a.m. and lunch is served between the hours of/a:45 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. The time constraints do not allow staff and students adequate interaction time. The room previously used for a music room is not available because it is necessarily used as a classroom for Alpha/Discovery students. Our patrons go to great lengths to provide things for our students that should be but are not furnished by the district. Tie are in great and immediate need of a multi-purpose room, and our patrons can not provide it. We are now turning to the Pulaski County Special School District to assist us in further enhancing the education received by the students at Warren Dupree, and in fulfilling an unspoken committment to the parents of those students, to delete as many adverse conditions and situationsas possible. WITH A MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM, TEACHERS WOULD BE ENABLE TO TEACH ORAL COMMUNICATIONS AS A SKILL THROUGH ASSEMILATION. A MULTI-PURPOSE Rom1 WOULD ALLOU STUDENTS TO PARTICIPATE IN THOSE PROGRAMS THAT ARE TRULY SUPPORTED BY THE DISTRICT SUCH AS TEAM LEARNING, DISCOVER ART, ltUSIC, STUDENT INTERACTION ACTIVITIES AND THE TEACHING OF MATH THROUGH THE USE OF MANIPULATIVES. THE Lil1ITATIONS OF THESE ACTIVITIES COULD EFFECT STUDENTS TEST SCORES.    The faculty and staff of Darren Dupree search for, find, and impart unique and diverse modes of enrichment through education. Our records are proof that quality learning is taking place . That is not enough. The act of educating is a science. We are the teachers and the scientists of today, imparting knowledge to the great minds of tomorrow. We now turn to you, to assist us in meeting our unanimous goal of providing every avenue possible for our students to enjoy a quality education. Warren Dupree Elementary Monitoring Team extends to you and your committe an invitation to meet with you and dicuss this area of concern. We are are very excited and looking forward to meeting you. Please contact us immediately to set a time that is convenient for all parties concerned. Respectfully, Warren Dupree Elementary Monitoring Team cc: Mr. Bobby Lester, Superintendent Mr. Billy Bowles, Superintendent of Desegration Ms. Sarah Homble, Director of Elementary Education Dr. Ruth Herts, Director of Desegregation Attachment c REASONS ~ UStG MANPUlA1MS 101EACH  MA11-EMA11CS .. Higher probability of student achievement ... . . Learning is made concrete .. Helps students with different learning stytes ... Appropriate for all age and ability levels .. Improves motor skills .. Improves spatial skills .. Promotes cooperation among students .. Motivating to use .. Cuts time needed for remediation - Easy to evaluate student understanding  .. Promotes active student participation .. T ex1books/NCTM standards recommend use .. Helps to make connections to the symbolic (abstract) - Helps in encouraging creativity/problem solving   FULLER ELEMENTARY       Fuller Elementary School 708 East Dixon Road Little Rock, AR Ms. Shyrel Rose, Principal Positive Observations and Comments 2.1 In classrooms observed, the teachers have adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum. 2.3 All students are actively involved in classroom instruction. 3.1 The school awards students for A's and B's, perfect attendance and most improved. 3.2 Procedures are evident to insure that students are apprised of requirements governing honors and awards. 4.0 The school staff insures that appointments to all school based committees are made in a non-biased and equitable manner which results in committees that have knowledge of educational 8.1 9.4 10.5 11.3 12.2 12.14 programs for a varied student population. Talented and gifted facilities are comparable to those of the campus in general. Staff development activities related to effective strategies to enhance the achievement of a diverse student population have been provided. In matters of school desegregation, school patrons and parents are given an opportunity to actively participate in developing the local school equity and improvement plans. Classroom instruction proceeds in an orderly manner. The school has appropriate strategies for attaining improvement goals. African-American resource speakers are invited to speak to students. Concerns 1.2 The school enrollment does not reflect the racial/ethnic composition prescribed by the court order. 6.1 There is an achievement disparity based on race. 12.12 Strategies to increase the number of African-American students enrolled in upper level courses (i.e., Alpha and Discovery) are not evident. 13.0 The covered walk area which connects the media center to the breezeway leaks. The restrooms need to be repaired. The wiring for the alarm needs to be completed. Floor tiles in several areas should be replaced . Fuller Elementary School  Page 2   ANALYSIS Of the sixty-one evaluation response items, approximately 7 percent were responses of concern and 93 percent were positive responses. The concern responses were in the areas of separation by race in school programs, student achievement, building leadership and miscellaneous. In comparison to last year's second semester report, there remained concerns about separation by race in school programs and student achievement. First Semester Monitoring Report, 1996-97 4b    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL Fuller Elementary VISIT DA TE December 5, 1996 PRINCIPAL Shyrel W. Rose TEAM CHAIR Diane Moore TEAM CO-CHAIR Rena McMurray ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No. _1_._2 __ Response Each school year in the spring, the administration works with Central Office Staff and Landmark Elementary to plan recnritment activities. Fuller Elementary has experienced soroe recnritment success\nhowever, the students that have been recnrited are not enough to make the enrollment racially balanced. The administration and staff will continue to follow the attendance guidelines and recnritment actiyitjes ta increase the nurnber of wbitQ itnd1az:it.\nQaEgllee. Assessment Area No. 6 .1 Response The administration and staff continue to monitor the curricultnn and review teaching strategies to encourage equitable teaching strategies throughout all grade levels. 'f'he e.o.~. plan Is reviewed regularly and the necessary revisions have been made as needed. Students continue to receive additional support from the Title I Language Arts 'feachet and the !'araptofessionals. Further, the LEAP Teachers work with the first and second grade teachers to improve stud,-nts' classroom and teat f)erfef'ffltfflee. Sttte:cnt~ in grades J and 4 have Jostens computers. Their time is monitored and the teachers send the parents reports at the eud of eacb grading peri ad Toe stud,-Rt.\u0026amp; taat t:eot the lowest in first grade are selected to participate in Reading Recovery. ~,J. tc\u0026amp;w, gnature of Principal 4-1 6.1 Continue -  12.11 13   Kindergarten, first and second grades participate in the activities in the Writing to Read Lab. Students in fifth and sixth grades have additional time with the Language Arts Teacher and the Paraprofessionals. The current test scores have been reviewed by the administration. Grade level/curriculum meetings will be held with all teachers. The scores and skills will be carefully reviewed and teachers will review the curriculum guides (reading and math) to determine students' needs. Fuller Elementary does not have any upper level courses. A team of teachers with the principal are selected each year to determine the list of students that will participate in the Alpha Program. The Alpha Teacher reviews the guidelines with the members of the team. All of the students (minority) test scores are carefully reviewed to determine the appropriate placement. Further, teacher reconmendations are considered as well. Repair work needed in the restrooms and sidewalks has been mentioned several times. The proper work orders will be completed again. The principal has spoken to the appropriate persons in the District concerning the alann system and the asbestos. There has been a complete turnover in the custodial staff. Meetings have been held to discuss the maintenance issues as well as the constant concerns with the restrooms. Some of the problems are beyond cleaning\nthey are with the physical structure .  HARRIS ELEMENTARY      1.3 2.5.2 2.5.3 3.2 4.0 5.0 6.2 8.1 9.1 10.4 11.3 12.12 Harris Elementary School 4424 Highway 161 North North Little Rock, AR Ms. Cherrie Johnson, Principal Positive Observations and Comments Class/course enrollment generally reflects the racial/ethnic composition of the school. Bulletin boards, publications and productions in the classroom reflect the racial/ethnic and gender differences of the student body. Evidence of student achievement which reflects varying teaching strategies is widely displayed. Procedures are evident to insure that students are apprised of requirements governing honors and awards. School committees are racially balanced. Participation in extracurricular activities generally reflects the school population. Goals and strategies are developed and implemented to decrease the achievement differences between black and white students. Talented and gifted facilities are comparable to those of the campus in general. Staff development activities related to educational equity have been provided . Contact is made regularly with the home to communicate positive as well as negative information related to student achievement. Classroom instruction proceeds in an orderly manner. There is evidence that the guidance program provides equitable services to all groups of students. Concerns 1.2 School enrollment does not reflect the racial/ethnic composition prescribed by the court order. The black student enrollment has increased. 6.1 There is an achievement disparity based on race. 13.0 The heater in one of the fifth grade classrooms should be repaired. Because the heater has such a loud noise, it must be turned off so that the students and teacher can hear. The floor tile in one of the kindergarten classrooms should be cleaned. There is mold in the grouts . Harris Elementary  Page 2    ANALYSIS Of the sixty-one response items, 5 percent were responses of concern and 95 percent were positive responses. The concern responses were in the areas of separation by race in school programs, student achievement and miscellaneous. In comparison to last year's second semester report, there remained concerns about separation by race in school programs and student achievement. First Semester Monitoring Report, 1996-97    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL Harri~ PRINCIPAL Cherri(' .Johnson VISIT DATE December 6 , 1996 TEAM CHAIR MArslrn Bow~rs. TEAM CO-CHAIRPh i 11 i p Davis ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No. _1_ .z _ Response Enrollment The racial ~-~mposition of Harris Elementary between .black and white- is 56 percent Jriinoriity. This is due to a growing community and families are moving back on a regular basis. Assessment Area No. 6. 1 Response Disparity of Test Scores Various teaching strategies are still being implemented to reduce disparity of test scores. Future Builders are in our building for tutoring and there are inactions going on between the teacher and tutors. Working with Future Builders is a 5\\ ~~~ Signal~    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY ANO IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM . EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL ________ PRINCIPAL ________ _ VISIT DATE TEAM CHAIR ________ _ TEAM CO-CHAIR _______ _ ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No. ____ Response ___________ _ Assessment Area No. _6_.1_ _ Response continued group called AMERICORP who work with students one on one and in small groups. 1}\u0026amp;\n~~ Signat~    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PAINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL Harris VISIT DATE 12/6/96 ASSESSMENT AREAS: PRINCIPAL C. Johnson TEAM CHAIR Marsha Bowers TEAM CO-CH.AJRPhil Davis 1.0 Separation by Rac~/Gender in School Prcgrams 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 SchooVDistrict Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Adivities 6.0 Student Achie'1ement Assessmen1 7. O Special Education 8.0 TaJented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11 .O Student DiscipUne 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No. 13. O Response ___________ _ I was totally ~naware of the situation with the heater in the fifth grade classroom. A work order had not been completed on this but it will be taken care of as soon as possible. The tile in the kindergarten will be cleaned over winter break. Assessment Area No. ____ Response ___________ _ 53  JACKSONVILLE ELEMENTARY      2.1 2.2 2.3 3.2 8.1 9.1 10.4 10.5 11.3 11.5 12.8 Jacksonville Elementary 1 08 South Oak Street Jacksonville, AR Ms. Susan Buchanan, Principal Positive Observations and Comments In classrooms observed, the teachers have adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum. Student progress is documented in student portfolios. All students are actively involved in classroom instruction. Procedures are evident to insure that students are apprised of requirements governing honors and awards. In talented and gifted classrooms observed, the teachers have adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum. Staff development activities related to educational equity have been provided. Contact is made regularly with the home to communicate positive as well as negative information related to student achievement. In matters of school desegregation, school patrons and parents are given an opportunity to actively participate in developing the local school equity and improvement plans. Classroom instruction proceeds in an orderly manner. The following strategies are used to decrease discipline disproportionality: conflict resolution, Cougar Weekly rewards, skating parties and extra recesses. The school office has friendly and helpful personnel. Concerns 6.1 There is an achievement disparity based on race. 8.2 The students in the Talented and Gifted Program are assigned to a classroom that is smaller than the other classrooms. 8.3 The classrooms allocated for the Talented and Gifted Program are separated from the other classrooms. 13.0 The kindergarten building roof needs to be repaired immediately. When it rains, the teachers have to cover materials and equipment with plastic. The Monitoring Team has cited concerns numerous times about the need to have a covered walkway from the Federal Building to the parent pick-up area and the teachers' parking lot.    Jacksonville Elementary Page 2 ANALYSIS Of the sixty-one evaluation response items, 7 percent were responses of concern and 93 percent were positive responses. The concern responses were in the areas of student achievement, talented and gifted and miscellaneous. In comparison to last year's second semester report, there remained concerns about the areas of student achievement and talented and gifted. There was improvement in the area of special education. First Semester Monitoring Report, 1996-97 55    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOLJacksonville Elem. PRINCIPAL Susan Buchanan VISIT DATE 11/21/96 TEAM CHAIR Boni ta Jimmar TEAM CO-CHAIR. ______ _ ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1.0 Separatio oy Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricu lar Ac ivities 6.0 Student Acilievement Assessment 7.0 Special EdL:cat1on 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellanecus Assessment Area No. _6_._l _ Response We continue to strive to lessen the academic disparity among races through providing whole lit-eracy hands on experience and Title I assistance. The transient population and family poverty levels at this school handicap many of our efforts toward improving family involvement in the children's education. We are focusing on careers, social skill OVEI Assessment Area No. _8_._2 _ Response The ACPHA program serves no more than 8 student's at 1 setting and has been in the portable building for the past 7 years. When the portables are replaced with permanent classroom structures the ACPHA program will be moved. C ~ l\u0026lt;L~~-4\u0026gt;J ignatur: ofrincipal Sb    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL Jacksonville Elem. PRINCIPAL Susan Buchanan VISIT DATE 11/21/96 TEAM CHAIR Boni ta Jimmar TEAM CO-CHAIR --------- ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurric~lar Activities 6.0 Student Acnievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No. 8. 3 Response The portables are separated from the rest of the main building as are the 3rd and 4th grade classrooms and the Title I reading lab. Portables by necessity are separate entities. However, they are connected by covered walkways. Assessment Area No. 13. O Response 1. The committee would like the form to be changed to better reflect all minorities. 2. Please see the attached letters addressed to the appropriate personnel to correct this area of concern. 3. This area was addressed with the food service personnel manager. It is a OVER C s:., 4 o,,e J 3. c,::,'--c ,,_ ,._} Signature of Principal 51  LANDMARK ELEMENTARY      1.4 2.5.3 5.0 4.0 7.3 8.1 10.3 10.5 Landmark Elementary School 16712 Arch Street Pike Little Rock, AR Mrs. Nancy Williams, Principal Positive Observations and Comments A diverse group of students participate in Odyssey of the Mind and Math Olympiad. Evidence of student achievement which reflects varying teaching strategies is widely displayed (e.g., Superstars, Dreams of the Future, etc.) The school has a racially diverse group of students as fire marshalls, media monitors and flag pole monitors. The school staff insures that appointments to all school based committees are made in a non-biased and equitable manner. The special education classrooms are integrated into the total school environment. In talented and gifted classrooms observed, the teachers have adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum. Contact is made regularly with the home to communicate positive as well as negative information related to student behavior (e.g., phone calls, notes, conferences, etc.) In matters of school desegregation, school patrons and parents are given an opportunity to actively participate in developing the local school equity and improvement plan. 11.3 Classroom instruction proceeds in an orderly manner. 11.4 The principal and assistant principal are very visible in the school. 12.2 The school has appropriate strategies for attaining improvement goals. 12.6 The building is always very clean. 12.14 African-American resource speakers are invited to speak to students. Concerns 1.2 School enrollment does not reflect the racial/ethnic composition prescribed by the court order. 6.1 There is an achievement disparity based on race. 13.0 There is a need to reconstruct the playground area. The roof leaks in the multipurpose room .    Landmark Elementary Page 2 ANALYSIS Of the sixty-one evaluation response items, 5 percent were responses of concern and 95 percent were positive responses. The concern responses were in the areas of separation by race in school programs, student achievement and miscellaneous. In comparison to last year's second semester report, there remained concern about the areas of separation of race in school programs, student achievement and miscellaneous. First Semester Monitoring Report, 1996-97    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL Landmark Elem. PRINCIPAL Nancy Williams VISIT DATE Dec. 5, 1996 TEAM CHAIR Karen Whitaker TEAM CO-CHAIR Connie Phillips ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No. J 2 Response We coot i nue to recruit through our Art and Music Program. Assessment Area No. 13,0 Response The Maintenance Department has been notified about the leaks in the roof in the Multi-Purpose Room . Signat~ of Principal    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL Landmark Elementary P RINCIPAL. ___Na~ n_.c. y.... . _W -i_ll_i a m_s ___ VISIT DATE Dec. 5, 1996 ASSESSMENT AREAS: TEAM CHAIR Karen Whitaker TEAM CO-CHAIR Connie Pbi JJ ips 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No. 6.1 Response We are using para-professionals for individual and small group help. Teachers are using math manipulatives, some whole language, overhead projectors to help with mor visuals. Assessment Area No. ____ Response ___________ _ Signature\nPrincipal  LAWSON ELEMENTARY      2.1 2.3 2.4 2.5.3 3.2 4.0 6.2 7.4 9.1 10.4 12.2 12.6 12.8 Lawson Elementary School 19901 Lawson Road Little Rock, AR Ms. Bonnie Shearer Hughes, Principal Positive Observations and Comments In classrooms observed, the teachers have adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum. All students are actively involved in classroom instruction. All seating patterns reflect a mixture of race and gender. Various student work is displayed throughout the school. Procedures are evident to insure that students are apprised of requirements governing honors and awards. There are no. racially identifiable committees within the school. Volunteers and staff are encouraged to hold membership on committees. Goals and strategies are developed and implemented to decrease the achievement differences between black and white students. Students are tested before they are placed in special education and they are re-evaluated every three years. Staff development activities related to educational equity have been provided . Contact is made regularly with the home to communicate positive as well as negative information related to student achievement. The school has appropriate strategies for attaining improvement goals. The campus and building are clean and free of debris and graffiti. The school office has friendly and helpful personnel. Concerns 1.2 The student enrollment is 16 percent African-American and 84 percent white. 6.1 There is an achievement disparity based on race. 13.0 The ceiling tiles are falling in some of the classrooms. The tiles have mold and mildew on them. This concern has been reported several years. The roof leaks and the lighting is poor in the building .    Lawson Elementary School Page 2 There are not adequate electrical outlets in the classrooms. Long extension cords are used in the classrooms to operate computers, audio visual equipment, etc. The electrical outlets in the primary classrooms are located over the sinks. Each classroom should have more shelves and storage space. The floor tiles and air conditioners are in poor condition. There is a sun roof in the primary area. Birds and small animals use the sun roof for a habitat. ANALYSIS Of the sixty-one evaluation response items, 5 percent were responses of concern and 95 percent were positive responses. The concern responses were in the areas of separation by race in school programs, student achievement and miscellaneous. In comparison to last year's second semester report, there remained concerns about the areas mentioned above . First Semester Monitoring Report, 1996-97  f I   PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL scHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE l SCHOOL Lawson Elementary  PRINCIPAL Bonnie Shearer-H1.1gbes VISIT DATE December 11, 1996 TEAM CHAIR John Threlkeld TEAM CO-CHAIR Dean Merriweather ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in Scho~I Programs 2.0 Curriculum . 3.o School/Distrtct lniiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education  8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management Assessment Area No. _1_. 2 _ R espo ns e _......:Th:..:..:..::e\n__b.::\n.:l::..:a=-=c\n.:.\n:kL.../wh=i::..::t-=e......::r=a=t:...zi~o-i_s.___ 17% black and 83% white. A recruitment plan bas beeo filed for increasing the minority ratio to 22% or above. The plan is being implemented. Assessment Area No. _6_.1 ___ Response Goals have been written to reduce the disparity between black and white achievement scores. The teachers and sta~f will work diligently to ach~eve the goals. ~~ \u0026gt;.-i L'\"f i ' ?~~\\t\u0026lt;k~ ~ of Principal 3    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL scHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL Lawson Elementary  PRINCIPAL Bonnie Shearer-Htigbes VISIT DATE December 11, 1996 TEAM CHAIR John Threlkeld TEAM CO-CHAIR Dean Merriweather ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in Scho~I Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.o School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management Assessment Area No. 13.0 Response ~ Hogan and Mr. Lester came to Lawson and were in agreement that we will get a new roof for the whole building and in the primary wing, we will get new ceilings, lighting, Jand air conditioning. The Equity Comnittee asked for a written response for the completion date. Assessment Area No. ____ Response ____________ _ J :~,)i~_g(k~ Signature of Principal  OAK GROVE ELEMENTARY      2.3 2.5.3 2.5.4 3.1 3.2 4.0 5.0 6.2 7.2 8.1 9.1 10.1 11.3 12.2 12.6 12.8 Oak Grove Elementary School Route 5, Box 158 North Little Rock, AR Mr. Ronnie Duke, Principal Positive Observations and Comments All students are actively involved in classroom instruction. The students' work was displayed in the classrooms and hallways. Multicultural curriculum is provided in all subject areas. Students receive awards in the areas of student achievement and citizenship. Students are apprised of requirements governing honors and awards. Correspondence is also sent to parents. All committees reflect a racial balance. Participation in extracurricular activities generally reflects the school population. Goals and strategies are developed and implemented to decrease the achievement differences between black and white students. Facilities for special education are designed to meet the needs of the students served. In talented and gifted classrooms observed, the teachers have adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum. Staff development activities related to educational equity have been provided. The school committees reflect diversity. Classroom instruction proceeds in an orderly manner. The school has appropriate strategies for attaining improvement goals. The building was clean. The school office has pleasant, friendly and helpful personnel. Concerns 6.1 There is an achievement disparity based on race. 13.0 The breezeway roof leaks .    Oak Grove Elementary School Page 2 ANALYSIS Of the sixty-one evaluation response items, 3 percent were responses of concern and 97 percent were positive responses. The concern responses were in the areas of student achievement and miscellaneous. In comparison to last year's second semester report, there remained concern about student achievement. First Semester Monitoring Report, 1996-97    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL Oak Grove Elementary PRINCIPAL Ronnie Duke ----------- VISIT DATE 12/05/96  TEAM CHAIR ---To-nda- M-oran- --- TEAM CO.CHAIR Annette Stuart ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 SchooVOistrict Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management Assessment Area No. 6 .1 Response The Jostens Computer program at Oak Grove Elementary now includes 2nd, 3rd and 4th grades this year. We are also providing a comprehensive develop-mental program for 4 year old students. Teachers continue to practice TESA and Team Learning methcxls. Assessment Area No. 13.0 Response --W-e h-ave- a- cu-rr-ent- w-ork- - order with maintenance to have the leak repaired. They have attanpted to repair this leak another time . Signature of Principal  OAKBROOKE ELEMENTARY      Oakbrooke Elementary School 2200 Thornhill Drive Sherwood, AR Mr. Karl Brown, Principal Positive Observations and Comments 1.4 There is a diverse group of students participating in Math Olympiad and the Student Council. 2.3 All students are actively involved in classroom instruction. 3.3 Procedures are evident to insure that students are apprised of information regarding various opportunities in educational programs. 4.0 The school staff insures that appointments to all school based committees are made in a non-biased and equitable manner which results in committees that have knowledge of educational programs for a varied 7.1 9.4 10.4 11.3 12.10 12.12 student population. In special education classrooms observed, the teachers have adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum. Staff development activities related to effective strategies to enhance the achievement of a diverse student population have been provided . Contact is made regularly with the home to communicate positive as well as negative information related to student achievement. Classroom instruction proceeds in an orderly manner. There is evidence that curriculum monitoring occurs. There is evidence that the guidance program provides equitable services to all groups of students. Concerns 6.1 There is an achievement disparity based on race. 13.0 The Monitoring Team has reported the following facilities concerns several times: The carpet is in poor condition. The front entrance light should be repaired. Several walls should be painted .    Oakbrooke Elementary Page 2 ANALYSIS Of the sixty-one evaluation response items, 3 percent were concern responses and 97 percent were positive responses. The concern responses were in the areas of student achievement and miscellaneous. In comparison to last years second semester report, there remained concerns about student achievement and miscellaneous. First Semester Monitoring Report, 1996-97 '\\O    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL 0akbrooke ElementaryPRINCIPAL~K\n.\n.a.\n..\nrl\n.....\n.\n.B.\n..\nro\n:\n.\n.w\n.\n....n ____ _ VISIT DATE November 18, 1996 TEAM CHAIR Carla .,.ladzam TEAM CO-CHAIR- M-ass-ey ------ ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 SchooVDi$trict Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management Assessment Area No. _6_.1_ _ Response ____________ See Attachment Assessment Area No. _11_.0 __ Response ____________ Signature of Principal    Assessment Area NO. 6.1 The staff at Oakbrooke Elementary will implement the following strategies to narrow the disparity performance between black and white students test scores: (1) Remedial assistance for students scoring below the 40th percentile on the SAT. (2) Parent volunteers to tutor students in grades K-2. (3) Each class strengths and weaknesses will be identified. Teachers will implement teaching strategies to improve students' performance. (4) Students in grades 3-6 will utilize Josten's software to strengthen the weak academic areas identified on the SAT 9 . Assessment Area NO. 13.0 A work order will be submitted to the maintenance department for new carpet and paint. The lights out front have been repaired. New partitions were installed in the boys' restroom. No partitions were installed in the girls' restroom .  PINE FOREST ELEMENTARY      Pine Forest Elementary School 400 Pine Forest Drive Maumelle, AR Ms. Mary Frances Ask, Principal Positive Observations and Comments 2.1 In classrooms observed, the teachers have adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum. 2.5.3 Evidence of student achievement which reflects varying teaching strategies is widely displayed. 4.0 The school staff insures that appointments to all school based committees are made in a non-biased manner which results in committees that have knowledge of educational 5.0 6.2 7.1 8.1 10.4 11.2 12.1 programs for a varied student population. Participation in extracurricular activities generally reflects the school population. Goals and strategies are developed and implemented to decrease the achievement differences between black and white students. In special education classrooms observed, the teachers have adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum. In talented and gifted classrooms observed, the teachers have adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum. Contact is made regularly with the home to communicate positive as well as negative information related to student achievement. Suspension and expulsion rates are generally representative of the student population. The school's improvement goals are posted in each classroom. Concerns 6.1 There is an achievement disparity based on race. 12.8 The office personnel needs to be more helpful and friendly . Pine Forest Elementary School  Page 2   ANALYSIS Of the sixty-one evaluation response items, 3 percent were responses of concern and 97 percent were positive responses. The concern responses were in the areas of student achievement and building leadership. In comparison to last year's second semester report, there remained concern in the area of student achievement. First Semester Monitoring Report, 1996-97    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL 'S RESPONSE SCHOOL Pine Forest Elementary PRINCIPAL Mazy F Ask VISIT DATE ___1_ 2_ .-...q _ _- ...9.... . .6.... ____ TEAM CHAIR sara Henry TEAM CO-CHAIR Lisa Marshal 1 ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1. 0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2. 0 Curriculum 3. 0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4. 0 Committees 5. 0 Extracurricular Activities @student Achievement Assessment 7. 0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 StaffDevelopment 10. 0 Parental Involvement 11 . 0 Student Discipline 12. 0 Building Leadership/Management Assessment Area No. 6-1 Response Achievement disparity continues to be evident. Pine Forest continues to address this problem. Signature~ ~ncipal    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL 'S RESPONSE SCHOOL Pine Forest Elementazy PRINCIPAL Mm F Ask VISIT DATE __ 1~2=--.....\n9_-..\n.9..\n.6 ___ TEAM CHAIR s a r a Henry TEAM CO-CHAIR T,i sa MarsbaJ J ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1. 0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3. 0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4. 0 Committees 5. 0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9. 0 Staff Development 10. 0 Parental Involvement 11. 0 Student Discipline ~uilding Leadership/Management AssessmentAreaNo. 12.8 Response This matter is being addressed .  PINEWOOD ELEMENTARY      Pinewood Elementary School 1919 Northeastern Avenue Jacksonville, AR Mr. Truett Mccurry, Principal Positive Observations and Comments 1.3 Class/course enrollments generally reflect the racial/ethnic composition of the school. 2.3 All students are actively involved in classroom instruction. 2.4 All class seating arrangements were racially balanced. 3.2 Procedures are evident to insure that students are apprised of requirements governing honors and awards. 4.0 The school staff insures that appointments to all school based committees are made in a non-biased and equitable manner which results in committees that have knowledge 5.0 6.2 7.1 7.6 8.2 9.1 10.4 12.2 12.3 of educational programs for a varied student population. Participation in extracurricular activities generally reflects the school population. Goals and strategies are developed and implemented to decrease the achievement differences between black and white students. In special education classrooms observed, the teachers have adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum. There is a Special Education IEP Committee which reviews the student exit process. Talented and gifted facilities are comparable to those of the campus in general. Staff development activities related to educational equity have been provided. Contact is made regularly with the home to communicate positive as well as negative information related to student achievement. The school has appropriate strategies for attaining improvement goals. Parents are kept informed via newsletters and memos. Concerns 6.1 There is an achievement disparity based on race. 12.6 The sixth grade restrooms are not clean. The boys' restroom has a strong order. The sink and handicapped bar should be replaced. The roof leaks in the second grade area. 12.8 The office staff is not friendly and helpful.    Pinewood Elementary School Page 2 ANALYSIS Of the sixty-one evaluation response items, 5 percent were responses of concern and 95 percent were positive responses. The concern responses were in the areas of student achievement and building leadership. In comparison to last year's second semester report, there remained concerns about student achievement and building leadership. There was improvement in the area of miscellaneous. First Semester Monitoring Report, 1996-97    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL PINEWOOD ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL TRUETT MCCURRY VISIT DATE _12_/_1_7_ /9 _6_ _____T EAM CHAIR ROBERT LEWIS TEAM CO-CHAIR SANRA WESTBROOK ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7 .0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parent Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No 6.1 Response: We are getting closer to our goal each year. We hope to close the gap. Our Title 1 program is working with students to help them improve their skills. Teachen are looking at test scores and teaching toward improving all students. Assessment Area No. 12.6 Response: Our building is clean and free of debris. One bathroom was messed up by our 6th grade girls. This problem bas been taken care of by our custodial staff. Signature of Principal    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL PINEWOOD ELEMENTARY PRINCIPAL TRUETT MCCURRY VISIT DA TE ...._1_2 / 1_ 7_/ 9 ....,6 _______T EAM CHAIR ROBERT LEWIS TEAM CO-CHAIR SANRA WESTBROOK ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 ScbooVDistrict Initiated Honon and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parent Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No 12.8 Response: Many of our parents do not like having to sign in when they come to school. When the secretary ask them to stop and sign in and get a  Our office area for arents is ve small. Man times our secretaries are covered u with work that must o out to the central office immediately. They tell the parents that they will be with them in iust a moment, but our parents do not like to wait. Assessment Area No. 13.0 Response: Our building is clean and free of debris. One bathroom was messed up by our 6th grade girls. This problem has been taken care of by our custodial staff. We are sprayed on a regular basis of bugs. When ever we see one or more, our custodian calls the bug man and he comes out within 24hr. Signature of Princip  ROBINSON ELEMENTARY      1.2 1.3 2.5.3 2.4 3.1 4.0 5.0 7.1 8.1 9.4 10.4 Robinson Elementary School 21600 Highway 10 Little Rock, AR Ms. Cindy Ballard, Principal Positive Observations and Comments School enrollment reflects the racial/ethnic composition prescribed by the court order. Class/course enrollments generally reflect the racial/ethnic composition of the school. Evidence of student achievement which reflects varying teaching strategies is widely displayed. (i.e., peer tutors, buddy systems, display of students' work). The seating patterns promote interaction among students from diverse backgrounds. A variety of awards and honors is provided in areas such as scholarship, attendance, superstars and the Student Council. The school administration actively recruits a diverse group of parents and staff to serve on all committees. Participation in extracurricular activities generally reflects the school population. In special education classrooms observed, the teachers have adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum. In talented and gifted classrooms observed, the teachers have adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum. Staff development activities related to effective strategies to enhance the achievement of a diverse student population have been provided. Contact is made regularly with the home to communicate positive as well as negative information related to student achievement (i.e., interim reports, weekly reports and the school newsletter). 11.3 The team observed that the students were on task. The teachers have used classroom management techniques. 12.1 The school has a mission statement which is posted in each classroom. 12.14 African-American resource speakers are invited to speak to students .    Robinson Elementary Page 2 Concerns 6.1 There is an achievement disparity based on race. 13.0 The Monitoring Team has recommended several times that the central office administration purchase new carpeting and build a cafeteria. A fence should be installed for safety reasons. ANALYSIS Of the sixty-one evaluation response items, 3 percent were responses of concern and 97 percent were positive responses. The concern responses were in the areas of student achievement and miscellaneous. In comparison to last year's second semester report, the areas which remained concerns were student achievement and miscellaneous. First Semester Monitoring Report, 1996-97    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL Robinson Elementary PRINCIPAL Cynthia L. Ballard VISIT DATE December 10, 1996 TEAM CHAIR Julie Nelson TEAM CO-CHAIR ______ _ ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management Assessment Area No. 6 .1 Response Yes. Robinson Elementary has an achievement disparity based on race. We continue to strive to close the gap through PA'IWICK, Family Math/Science/Literature, Family Literacy Nights, and a multitude of enriching activities throughout the curriculum. Assessment Area No. 13. o Response See Attached\nof Principal c~~-ea\\\\x-J    Assessment Area No. 13.0 Response Yes The Local Monitoring Team stated that new carpeting is needed at Robinson Elementary. It is the original carpeting - 22 years old. It has rips, stains, mildew, and is threadbare in many places. It would be beneficial to all concerned for the carpet to be replaced. The team also noted a safety precaution of putting up a fence along the west play area. The reasoning behind this request is due to new construction and widening of the road. Robinson Elementary has a dire need for a gym or cafeteria facility - with enclosed space for lunch and various learning activities that can't be done in Open Space .  SCOTT ELEMENTARY      1.2 1.3 2.3 2.4 2.5.3 7.1 8.2 9.4 10.2 11.3 12.2 Scott Elementary School 15306 Alexander Road Scott, AR Ms. Jo Wilson, Principal Positive Observations and Comments School enrollment reflects the racial/ethnic composition prescribed by the court order. Class/course enrollments generally reflect the racial/ethnic composition of the school. All students are actively involved in classroom instruction. The seating patterns promote interaction among students from diverse backgrounds. Evidence of student achievement which reflects varying teaching strategies is widely displayed in the hallway and classrooms. In special education classrooms observed, the teachers have adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum. Talented and gifted facilities are comparable to those of the campus in general. Staff development activities related to effective strategies to enhance the achievement of a diverse student population have been provided . The school utilizes a variety of methods (memo, letter, phone, home visits) to encourage parental involvement in school and in home supported educational activities. Classroom instruction proceeds in an orderly manner. The classrooms are orderly and quiet. The rules are posted in each classroom. The principal and teachers have knowledge and understanding of and a sensitivity to the unique features of the community and neighborhoods (e.g., socioeconomic, etc.) of their students. 12.8 The school office has friendly and helpful personnel. 12.14 African-American resources speakers are invited to speak to students on a regular basis. Concerns 6.1 There is an achievement disparity based on race. 12.6 There is a strong odor in the students' restrooms. This odor can be smelled in the hallway. 13.0 The following facility concern has been cited previously: The health room is located in the principal's office area. There is a restroom in the area also. It is necessary that    Scott Elementary Page 2 adults have access to hot water for sanitary purposes. However, there is no hot water in the restroom. ANALYSIS Of the sixty-one evaluation response items, 5 percent were responses of concern and 95 percent were positive responses. The concern responses were in the areas of student achievement, building leadership and miscellaneous. In comparison to last year's second semester report, there remained concerns about student achievement and miscellaneous. First Semester Monitoring Report, 1996-97    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL Scott Elementary PRINClPAL Jo ~ilson VISIT 0ATE._ _1 _0_-_29\n...-..9... .,6 __T EAM CHAIR Lisa Payne TEAM CO-CHAIR Jeanette Rogers ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1.0 Separation oy Race/Gender in School Prc~rams 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 ScnooVDistrict Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assess~ent 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Oeve\\opment , 0.0 Parenta! Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline , 2.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No. _6__1 __ Response See Attachment Assessment Area No. _1_2_._6 _ Response A fund raiser was held by the Scott PTA and the funds will be directed toward the renovation pf the playground. The pea gravel \\:ill be taken up and removed from the playground area in the spring._ Pine bark will be put dawn in the playground area under the jungle gym, etc. Uork should be comnl~t~ by spring break in March, 1997. fl ._ ) __\\ J...,.....~. ..... ..,1,{, 111 .J~\n-~~--=------ sanature of Principal i\\ ~Q ~    Assessment Area No. 6.1 Response: In order to address the disparity in achievement test scores our school has become a school-wide Chapter I project so all students can benefit from Chapter services. We have the Josten's Leaming program in reading and math with three computers and a printer in each classroom working\nthe third and fourth grade classes have being using their computers since the beginning school in 1995 and the other classes are now on line. The Reading Program is continuing to be implemented in the first grade. Test Taking Tactics will be taught at all grade levels to better prepare students for achievement testing. Grants from Rockefeller Fmmdation and the State Department are being utilized to purchase books for students to take home nightly. and to provide staff development in new teaching techniques. and to provide materials for book making .    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL Scott Elementacy VISIT DATE io-29- 96 PRtNC\\PAL Jo \\.\nilson TEAM CHAIR Lisa Payne TEAM CO-CHAIR Jeanette Rogers ASSESSMENT AREAS: , .a Separation oy Race/Gender in School Prcx_rams 2.0 Cumculum 3.0 ScnocvO,strict Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 ExtracurricJlar Adivities 6.0 Student Achievement Assess~ent 7.0 Special Education a.a Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development , 0.0 Parenta! involvement , , .0 Student Discipline , 2.0 Building LeadershipiManagement 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No. 13.0 Response The primary girls, boys and the intemediate boys, girls bathrooms have been renovated. Stall doors have been installed along with ne\\l stalls. The floors have been treated with a disinfectant and oopped \\nth a deodorizer. Bathroor:1s h2ve been brought up to standards. Request has been r.,ade to maintenance for hot \\:ater heater and to be built around the sink in bathroom. Assessment Area No. ____ Response ___________ _ S~ature of Principal ~ '-fi)l\u0026amp; Acting Principal  SHERWOOD ELEMENTARY      2.2 2.3 2.5.1 3.1 9.1 10.2 11.3 12.14 Sherwood Elementary School 307 Verona Avenue Sherwood, AR Mr. Larry A. Fuller, Principal Positive Observations and Comments All teachers keep progress records of achievement in several ways. The committee observed all students involved in class-room instruction. The principal's office, hallways, classrooms and media center have visual displays which reflect the racial differences of the student body. Perfect attendance awards, superstars awards, birthday recognition and fire marshals include students of a diverse ethnic background. Staff development activities related to educational equity have been provided. The principal visits homes, makes phones calls, and sends memos and letters to parents. The PTA sends newsletters, memos and makes phone calls. Teachers send memos and make phone calls. Classroom instruction proceeds in an orderly manner. African-American resource speakers are invited to speak to students . Concerns 1.3 The class enrollment at the fourth grade level does not reflect the racial composition of the school. 6.1 There is an achievement disparity based on race. 7.1 In the special education classrooms, the teachers do not have adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum. 7.3 The special education classrooms are not integrated into the total school environment. 11.2 The suspension rates are not representative of the student population. It is disproportionate based on race. 12.7 The hallways are not orderly .    Sherwood Elementary School Page 2 ANALYSIS Of the sixty-one evaluation items, 1 O percent were responses of concern and 90 percent were positive responses. The concern responses were in the areas of separation by race in school programs, student achievement, special education, student discipline, building leadership and miscellaneous. In comparison to last year's second semester report, there remained concerns in the areas of student achievement, student discipline and miscellaneous. There was improvement, however, in the areas of curriculum and parental involvement. First Semester Monitoring Report, 1996-97    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL Sherwood Elementary PRINCIPAL Larry A, Fnl l er VISIT DATE December 13, 1996 TEAM CHAIR Teresa Killough TEAM CO-CHAI R._Le_t_h_a T_o_dd_ ____ ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No. _1_ _. 3 __ Response I don't understand the \"no\" answer here. There are no one race or one sex or isolated students. Our entire student population is down. Fourth grade lost a teacher, but it isn't the grade level with the lowest number of minority students. I disagree with the \"no\" answer. Assessment Area No. _ 6__1 ___ Response Disparity continues to be an issue across the three districts. The committtee made some excellent suggestions. We do not have as much disparity as some schools and it gets lower the longer we have students .    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'$ RESPONSE SCHOOL Sherwood Elementary PRINCIPAL Larry A. Fuller VISIT DATE December 13, 1996 TEAM CHAIR Teresa Killough TEAM CO-CHAIR Letha Todd ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No. _7_. o ___ Response I disagree with this statement. Ms. Smith is a beginning teacher, so naturally she doesn't have as much material as a 20 year teacher. She is provided the same materials and opportunities as everyone else. Assessment Area No. _7_.3 ___ Response I disagree with the committee. I feel they injected personal bias into this item. The faculty during COE suggested grouping Special Education classes together as we do first and second grades, etc. Most students served are in the upper grades, so regular classes and resource classes are on the same f]aar    PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL Sherwood Elementary PRINCIPAL Larry A. Fuller VISIT DATE December 13, 1996 TEAM CHAIR Teresa Killough TEAM CO-CHAIR- L-e th-a -To-dd ----- ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum 3.0 School/District Initiated Honors and Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management 13.0 Miscellaneous Assessment Area No. _11_._2 _ Response Discipline rates are roughly equal, but still disproportionate. Our discipline management plan continues to improve these numbers. Assessment Area No. _1_2_. 7 _ Response I don't understand this answer. Teachers and administrators observe students and insure orderly conduct. We have had no injuries or major, even minor, discipline reports for hall behavior . '~ re of Principal  SYLVAN HILLS ELEMENTARY      Sylvan Hills Elementary School 402 Forest Ridge Road Sherwood, AR Ms. Diane Vogler, Principal Positive Observations and Comments 2.1 In classrooms observed, the teachers have adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum. 2.3 The children were actively involved. The students' work was displayed very well. 2.5.1 The school's bulletin boards and visual aids reflect the raciaVethnic and gender differences of the students. 2.5.3 Various teaching strategies are used at the school. These strategies include peer tutoring team learning and shared paired reading. 3.4 The offerings and procedures regarding honors and awards are evaluated regularly for equity and to determine if new awards are necessary to meet student needs. The staff 4.0 7.1 9.1 10.1 12.2 12.6 12.10 NOTE: awarding students for perfect attendance. Committee appointments are made with attention given to choosing members from various backgrounds. Committees are racially balanced. In special education classrooms observed, the teachers have adequate materials and equipment to deliver the curriculum. The importance of educational equity has been emphasized through workshops, committee assignments and staff meetings. Parents from many cultural backgrounds are actively involved in all school functions. (I.e., Arts in Education Program and the PTA). The school has appropriate strategies for attaining improvement goals. The campus and building are clean. There is evidence that curriculum monitoring occurs. The teachers' plan books are evaluated weekly. New carpet was installed in the first grade building. Concerns 6.1 There is an achievement disparity based on race .    Sylvan Hills Elementary School Page 2 13.0 The following concerns have been reported before: More lights should be installed on the parking lots and in the courtyard. The roof still leaks in some areas (e.g., classroom 121 ). ANALYSIS Of the sixty-one evaluation response items, 3 percent were responses of concern and 97 percent were positive responses. The concern responses were in the areas of student achievement and miscellaneous. In comparison to last year's second semester report, the areas which remained concerns were student achievement and miscellaneous. First Semester Monitoring Report, 1996-97  I ,   PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION SCHOOL EQUITY AND IMPROVEMENT MONITORING TEAM EXIT CONFERENCE PRINCIPAL'S RESPONSE SCHOOL Sylvan Hi 11 s El err.. PRINCIPAL Diane C. Vogler _ VISIT DATE November 21, 1996 TEAM CHAIR Regina Roberts TEAM CO-CHAIR Lenette Thomas ASSESSMENT AREAS: 1.0 Separation by Race/Gender in School Programs 2.0 Curriculum . 3.o SchooVDistrict Initiated Honors and -Awards 4.0 Committees 5.0 Extracurricular Activities 6.0 Student Achievement Assessment 7.0 Special Education 8.0 Talented and Gifted 9.0 Staff Development 10.0 Parental Involvement 11.0 Student Discipline 12.0 Building Leadership/Management Assessment Area No. _6_.1 __ Response See Attachment Assessment Area No. _1_3_o. _ Response see Attacbroeot    6.1 There continues to be disparity based on race on standardized achievement test scores. This year's new test form and limited skill review time prior to the administration of the test are contributing factors. We are constantly promoting a positive self esteem with individual students, as well as utilizing the concepts of team learning, peer tutoring, and TESA. Members of the Teachers' of Tomorrow also provide individual or small group tutoring with students who need additional assistance. 13.0 a. Richard Wilkerson, Director of Maintenance, has been contacted about the lighting in the courtyard and new staff parking lot. This has been placed on the work list to be completed as soon as possible. b. Due to the district's financial situation, additional nurses can not be provided. e. Additional computers can not be provided until the district receives millage money. f. The district continues to work toward the completion of the construction at our school. Due to emergencies in the district, they will finish as soon as possible. g. Carpet will be installed in classrooms as soon as the PTA and school can provide the funding .  TAYLOR ELEMENTARY      1.3 2.1 2.2 3.1 4.0 6.2 7.5 9.4 10.2 11.1 11.3 11.4 12.1 12.13 12.14 Murrell Taylor Elementary School Route 1 , Box 43-A Jacksonville, AR Ms. Ellen Eddings, Principal Positive Observations and Comments Class/course enrollments generally reflect the racial/ ethnic composition of the school. Teachers are required to mark multicultural curriculum guides and other curriculum guides. Student records are maintained and gra\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1646","title":"Court filings: District Court, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) response to Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD), Little Rock School District (LRSD), and North Little Rock School District's (NLRSD's) statement of material and undisputed facts with respect to issues of health insurance, special education, and loss funding","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1997-02-10"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Arkansas. Department of Education","Special districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","Little Rock School District","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Education--Arkansas","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Education and state","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School management and organization","School improvement programs","School employees","Employee rights","Student assistance programs"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings: District Court, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) response to Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD), Little Rock School District (LRSD), and North Little Rock School District's (NLRSD's) statement of material and undisputed facts with respect to issues of health insurance, special education, and loss funding"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1646"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["50 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  .. RECE~VED FILED FEB 181997 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT co~\"0AfJ~~~l./,~~,~::,c:A~ EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FEB '1 0 1997 DESEGREi~~: ~tNITOR!NG WESTERN DMSION JAr..'.[:i W. NICvlJrtMnul'\\, liL~RK LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL By: ____ -:;::;;-;:;-;;-;;;;- oEP CLERK FEB 1 ::- 10 OFFiC2 ..,, DESEGREGATIOt~ MONITORJNG DEFENDANTS INTERVENORS INTERVENORS ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION'S RESPONSE TO PCSSD, LRSD AND NLRSD'S STATEMENT OF MATERIAL AND UNDISPUTED FACTS WITH RESPECT TO ISSUES OF HEALTH INSURANCE, SPECIAL EDUCATION AND LOSS FUNDING The Arkansas Department of Education (\"ADE\") responds to PCSSD, LRSD and NLRSD's \"Statement of Material and Undisputed Facts\" with respect to issues of health insurance, special education and loss funding as follows: Fact No, 1: State EquaHzation Funding - Act 917 of 1995 changed the method the State uses to distribute aid to school districts. Prior to 1996-97 the Department of Education distributed the majority of state aid as Minimum Foundation Program Aid (MFPA). In addition, the state funded other programs such as Transportation Aid and At-Risk Grants by formulas or based on need. The ' I  State also paid Teacher Retirement Matching and Health Insurance Matching on behalf of school districts. The calculation for MFP A included add-on weights for various categories such as Special Education, Isolated School Districts, Consolidation Incentives, Vocational Education and (sic) Centers, Gifted and Talented Students, and growth and loss funding (Arkansas Budget System, Agency Program Commentary for the 1997-1999 Biennium, (\"ABS\") p. 29). Act 917 now requires State Equalization Funds to be distributed to districts based on the number of students, Average Daily Membership (ADM), equalized by the wealth of the district. The purpose of this funding is to equalize the disparities of property wealth throughout Arkansas (ABS p. 29). ADE's Response: It is undisputed that the Districts have accurately quoted the ABS. However, the statement that the purpose of Equalization Funding is to \"equalize the disparities of property wealth\" between districts is an oversimplification. The formula for calculating Equalization Funding takes into account local assessed property values, miscellaneous funds, the amount of funds available for Equalization Funding, and the number of students in the State and in each district. See generally Sections 4(d), 4(n), 4(s) of Act 917 of 1995 (Ark. Code Ann. 6-20-203(4), (14) and (19)). More precisely stated, the purpose of equalization funding is to reduce the disparity of total state and local funds available to school districts for the education of children. 2  I Moreover, the Districts inaccurately state that the quoted passage from ABS comes from the \"Agency Program Commentary\" section. In fact, the quoted passage comes from the section entitled \"Analysis of Budget Request,\" which is drafted by the Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration, and not ADE. Fact No. 2: Prior to this fiscal year, the _$tate distributed formula aid utilizing weighted average daily memberships (\"W ADM''). ADE's Response: It is undisputed that W ADM was one of several factors used in the calculation of Minimum Foundation Program Aid for school districts prior to fiscal year 1996-97. See generally Ark. Code Ann. 6-20-306 (b) (Michie 1995 Supp.) (Repealed effective July 1, 1996). Fact No. 3: The previous Arkansas school funding formula (Act 34) used W ADM to determine the amount of money a school district received. The formula added weights to account for the high cost of educating certain students and provided more money for those students. The add-on weights included: special education, gifted and talented, vocational education, isolated district, consolidation incentive funds, growing district, loss funding, and vocational centers. (Imber, Finding of Fact No. 8) ADE's Response: It is undisputed that WADM was one of several factors used in the calculation of Minimum Foundation Program Aid for school districts prior to fiscal year 1996-97. See generally Ark. Code Ann. 6-20-306 (b) (Michie 3 - 1995 Supp.) (Repealed effective July 1, 1996). It is also undisputed that the calculation of W ADM included weights for special education, gifted and talented, vocational education, isolated district, consolidation incentive funds, growth funding, loss funding, and vocational centers. Fact No, 4: It was not clear that the add.-on weights that were assigned were sufficient to meet the needs of the students. For 1994-95, the W ADM was approximately 505,000, of which 435,000 was actual students and 70,000 was addon weights. The percentage of add-ons in districts ranged from 6% to 40%. There were some students who, because of their high need, generated three times the SBER (Imber, Finding of Fact No. 9) (Gooden p. 17). ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 5: Any aid distributed for health insurance matching this fiscal year will be distributed on an \"equalized\" ADM basis and will not consider employee costs or numbers of employees. ADE's Response: Disputed. There is no appropriation for \"health insurance matching\" for school district employees in Act 1194 of 1995 for 1996- 97, and there are no identifiable or earmarked \"health insurance matching\" dollars distributed to school districts as state equalization funding. Rather, under Section 14 of Act 1194 of 1995 the responsibility for paying the health insurance contribution rate for eligible employees has now been shifted to school districts 4 throughout the State. A school district may satisfy this obligation in total or in part with moneys received from the State as state equalization funding, and it may satisfy this obligation in part or in whole with local revenue. Moreover, the statutory formula for the distribution of state equalization funding does not \"equalize\" ADM. Rather, the formula \"equalizes\" or \"adjusts\" the amount of money distributed per ADM to each district based upon a district's local wealth. See response to Fact No. 1. Fact No. 6: The State has terminated its payment of health insurance matching for the employees of the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (\"ODM\"). ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No. 7: The responsibility for funding health insurance matching for employees of the ODM has now become the responsibility of the three school districts in Pulaski County and their contributions to the budget of the ODM have been increased accordingly. ADE's Response; Disputed. The obligation for paying for health insurance matching for ODM employees now rests with ODM. The total ODM budget is funded by contributions from the three Districts and the State. Fact No. 8: For 1994-95, $36,315,000 was budgeted for public school employee insurance which was paid (by the State) to Blue Cross Blue Shield for insurance for teachers. (Imber, Finding of Fact No. 24(8)). 5 ADE's Response: Disputed. The $36,315,000 budgeted for public school employee insurance was budgeted for the payment of health insurance matching for all eligible employees who elected to participate in the Public School Health Insurance program. The pool of eligible employees included teachers and other eligible \"non-teacher\" school district employees~ Fact No. 9: Public School Employee Insurance - provides for health insurance contributions for employees of the Cooperative Education Service Areas, Vocational Centers and the school operated by the Department of Correction. The priority request of$36,030 in FY98 and $74,222 in FY99 allows for a 6% growth in rates of employees (ABS p. 13). ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 10: Public School Employee Insurance - This program pays the health insurance contribution rate established by the State Board of Education for employees of the Cooperative Education Services Areas, Vocational Centers, and the school operated by the Department of Correction (ABS p. 32). ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No. 11: Any aid distributed and thus available for special education costs this fiscal year will be distributed on an \"equalized\" ADM basis and will not consider the costs of educating special education students. (Rossmiller, p. 99) 6 ADE's Response: Disputed. The cited testimony of Dr. Rossmiller concerned the formula for calculation of state equalization funding. While Act 1194 contains appropriations for 1996-97 for, e.g., Special Education Services and Early Childhood Special Education, there is no general \"special education\" appropriation for distibution to school districts, and there are no identifiable or eannarked \"special education\" dollars distributed to school districts as state equalization funding. School districts may fund special education programs in whole or in part with moneys received from the State as state equalization funding, from local revenue, or from federal funds. Moreover, the statutory formula for the distribution of state equalization funding does not \"equalize\" ADM. Rather, the formula \"equalizes\" or \"adjusts\" the amount of money distributed per ADM to each district based upon, among other things, a district's local wealth. See response to Fact No. 1. Fact No, 12: School districts located in urban centers with extensive medical services available can anticipate a high concentration of high cost special education students. (Gooden, p. 17) ADE's Response: Disputed. The Districts have not produced any evidence that they have such a \"high concentration\" of such \"high cost\" students. School districts with small enrollments may have a higher percentage or 7 - concentration of severely disabled students than school districts located in urban areas. Sydoriak Deposition at 62: 17-63 :8. Fact No, 13: At page 14 of the ABS, the ADE has commented in part concerning residential centers that: \"Students are the responsibility of the district where the facility is located.\" ADE's Response: It is undisputed that these Districts have accurately quoted page 14 of the \"ABS.\" However, the statement is not accurate. The District where the facility is located is responsible for the children if it is known at the time of placement that the placement will be for more than 60 days. If it is not known at the time of placement that the placement will be for more than 60 days, the district from which the child originated is responsible for the first 60 days, and the district in which the facility is located is responsible for the child beginning with day 61 of placement. Sydoriak Deposition (attached hereto as Exhibit 1) at 8:22-9:5. Fact No, 14: Residential Centers - This is a special education program to provide reimbursement to school districts for educational costs associated with students in approved residential tre.atment facilities. Prior to 1996- 97, the ABS asserts, the program was funded as an add-on weight through the minimum Foundation Aid program. The 1995-96 reimbursement of approximately 8 $6 million funded 710 beds in 8 approved residential treatment facilities. The Department has budgeted $6,512,000 for FY97 (ABS p. 27). ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 15: The priority request of$856,662 in FY98 and $908,062 for FY99 is to provide additional funding for anticipated growth in student placement at approved residential treatment facilities and/or juvenile . detention facilities (ABS p. 27). ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 16: For the 1996-97 school year, the special education specialists at the Arkansas Department of Education calculated that an appropriation in excess of $12,000,000 would be necessary to fund the costs for residential education. ADE's Response: Disputed. In May of 1996 the administrator for grants and data management for ADE's Special Education division calculated that approximately $12 million would be necessary for funding of students in residential treatment facilities under the fund distribution method that existed prior to the enactment of Act 917 of 1995. At the time the calculation was made, the individual who made the calculation was unaware that the method of distribution had been changed by Act 917. Sydoriak Deposition at 15:19-17:23. The new fund distribution method, as was the case under the distribution method in effect prior to 9 - the enactment of Act 917, is a pure funding \"pass through\" in which residential treatment facilities do not bill school districts in excess of the amount of state funding provided to the district. The amounts distributed under the prior and new law are therefore, by definition, \"adequate.\" Sydoriak Deposition at 39:11-40:12. Fact No, 17: For the 1995-96 school year, the State reimbursed school districts approximately $57 per child per day for treatment in residential treatment facilities. For this school year, those school districts, including the districts in Pulaski County, have been advised that this per diem reimbursement has been reduced to just over $44 per child per day for the same treatment. ADE's Response: Undisputed. It is also undisputed that no treatment facility, including the facilities located in Pulaski County, is charging any school district in excess of the state's current per diem reimbursement rate. ~ response to Fact No. 16. Fact No, 18: Pursuant to Act 1194, there was no line item appropriation for student growth funding for the previous fiscal year but the line item appropriation for this fiscal year is $29,000,000. ADE's Response: Undisputed. Under the school funding statutes in effect prior to July 1, 1996, student growth funding was not a separate line item appropriation but rather was generated through a ''weight\" as part of Minimum 10 -' . .1 Foundation Program Aid. See Ark. Code Ann. 6-20-302(1) (Michie 1995 Supp.) (Repealed effective July l, 1996). Fact No, 19: Student Growth - This provides school districts additional funding for first quarter growth in the number of students over the .. previous year's ADM. Prior to 1996-97, student growth was part of the Minimum Foundation Aid calculation (ABS p. 25). ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 20: In 1995-96 the state funded growth of approximately 7,400 additional students times the State Base Equalization [sic] (SBER) of $2,754 for a total of $20.3 million. For 1996-97 growth funding is calculated as the Base Local Revenue Per Student (\"BLRPS\") (currently $3,759) times .4 plus $1,500 for a total of $3,003 per student This rate is then multiplied by the increase in the district's ADM for the first quarter over the previous year's ADM. For FY97 the Department has budgeted $22.6 million for Student Growth (ABS p. 25). ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 21: Act 917 retained student growth funding as a feature of state aid for districts with expanding enrollments. ADE's Response: Undisputed. Student Growth funding for 1996-97 is provided from available funds in a line-item appropriation within the Public School Fund. See Sections 3(b )and 4(u) of Act 917 of 1995, Ark. Code Ann.  6- 11 - - 20-303(21), 6-2~307(a). All districts with inar.asing ADM, including PCSSD, LRSD and NLRSD, will receive growth funding for the 1996-97 school year. See Declaration of Tristan Greene in Opposition to 1his Motion (\"Greene Declaration\"), 12 and Exh. A Fact No, 22: Subsection (b )( 4) foDd that there were 24,166 students in kindergarten through Grade 12 in the state's largest school district. ADE's Response: As written, this \"f.acf' is unintelligible. Assuming the Districts are referring to Section 2(bX4) of Act 917 of 1995, it is undisputed. Fact No, 23: The state's largest school district is the Little Rock School District. ADE's Response: Assuming this .. fact' refers specifically to a comparison of school districts by the.ir Average Daily Membership, it is undisputed. If this \"fact\" refers to geographic area, it is disputed. FactNo.24: In fiscal year 1995 State funds for public schools totaled approximately $1.2 billion, of which $941 million was distributed through the Minimum Foundation Program Aid Formula (\"MFPA\") and approximately $300 million was distributed outside ofMFPA (Imber, Finding of Fact No. 6) ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 25: School districts received money outside the Act 34 MFPA formula to help offset the costs of transportation. The Act 34 formula took 12  into account the size of a district, the number of students to be transported and the age and size of the buses used. Under the Act 34 formula the state used to disburse transportation funds, some districts received more money than they actually spent on transportation and some districts did not receive enough money to cover their actual costs of transportation. (Imber, Finding of Fact No. 28) ADE's Response: The school funding statutes in effect prior to July 1, 1995 contained no formula for distribution of transportation funds. Transportation funds were distributed based upon a formula contained in Rules and Regulations promulgated by the State Board of Education. With the foregoing qualification, Fact No. 25 is undisputed . Fact No, 26: Transportation aid was eliminated under Act 1194 as a separate line item and incorporated into the new school funding formula (ABS, p. 32). ADE's Response: It is unclear what is meant by the term \"incorporated into.\" It is undisputed that Act 1194 contains no specific line-item appropriation for Transportation Aid for 1996-97. It is also undisputed that Act 917 includes \"Transportation Aid\" in the definition of \"Student Needs Funding.\" See Section 4(v) of Act 917 of 1995 (Ark. Code Ann.  6-20-303(22)). However, to the extent the Districts claim that there is some identifiable amount of\"Transportation Aid\" being distributed as state equalization funding, the fact is disputed. There are no 13 identifiable or earmarked \"transportation aid\" funds in state equalization funding. School districts may pay their transportation costs in whole or in part with funds received from the State as state equalization funding or in whole or in part with local revenue. See Section 3(a) of Act 917 (Ark. Code Ann.  6-20-309(a)). Fact No. 27: Page 14 of the ABS_contains a new request by the Arkansas Department of Education (\"ADE\") for $10,000,000 each fiscal year \"to assist districts with high cost transportation.\" This is a \"priority request\" of the Arkansas Department of Education. ADE's Response: Undisputed. ADE has requested an appropriation of $10 million for fiscal years 1997-98 and 1998-99 to assist districts with high transportation costs. The Executive Recommendation, however, is for a total of $10 million dollars for each year to be used for assisting districts with high transportation costs and for funding safety training for school bus drivers and mechanics. So that the Court will not be misled, \"priority request\" is a tenn of art that simply means a request for an appropriation that is in excess of Base Level. All such requests are called \"priority requests\" in the ABS. Fact No, 28: For 1994-95, the State of Arkansas forecasted general revenue at $2,527,765,452, including Education Excellence Trust Funds. Of that amount 48.8%, or $1,233,546,155, was spent on the Public School Fund. (Imber, Finding of Fact No. 23). 14 -' -'  . 1 __ .. - .. ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 29: The Public School Fund provides the primary state financial assistance to Arkansas public elementary and secondary schools. For FY97, the Public School Fund is projected to receive General Revenue funding of $1,261,159,912. The Educational Excellence Trust Fund forecast for the Public School Fund will provide an additional $142,454,921. For FY97, the Public School Fund will receive approximately 47% of the State's Revenue Stabiliz.ation allocations. With Educational Excellence included, the Public School Fund is scheduled to receive 49% of the State's General Revenues (ABS p. 23). ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 30: Money is not the only factor which affects the quality of a student's education. Factors other than money which affect the quality of education include (1) the education level of the family, (2) the socioeconomic level of the community, (3) the curriculum, (4) the teachers, (5) the percentage of money going into the classroom as compared to other costs, such as administration and capital expenditures, and ( 6) the course-taken patterns of the students. The Arkansas school funding formula (Act 34) did not take these factors into account in determining the amount of aid available per student. (Imber, Finding of Fact No. 130) 15 ADE's Response: Undisputed. While the formula for calculating MFPA did not take these factors into account for purposes of calculating MFP A, other statutes, funding programs and rules and Regulations of the State Board of Education took into account these factors. Fact No, 31: Neither Act 917 nor ,Act 1194 take into account the factors set forth in paragraph 31. ADE's Response: Disputed. Among other things, the new funding scheme includes teacher salary requirements that can affect the \"percentage of money going into the classroom.\" Moreover, because the distribution of equalization funding takes into account the local wealth of the district, it roughly takes into account the \"socioeconomic status of the community.\" Further, as was the case prior to July 1, 1995, there are other existing statutes and rules and Regulations of the State Board of Education that take into account the listed factors. Fact No, 32: There have been no studies to show how much it costs per pupil to provide a \"general, suitable and efficient\" educational opportunity to Arkansas school children. The amount of money spent on a student's education in Arkansas is directly related to the amount of money available to be spent. (Imber, Finding of Fact No. 132) ADE's Response: Undisputed. 16 Fact No, 33: Equality does not necessarily mean equal dollars spent per student because some students have greater needs and require more money to educate. Equality means equal access to programs. Differences in money should depend on the cost and the need. High cost students should receive more money. (Imber, Finding of Fact No. 133). ADE's Response: To the extent the third and fourth sentences of this \"fact\" are understood to be reffering to the total amount of state, local and federal funds available to and expended by school districts, it is undisputed. Fact No, 34: As part of Act 917, the three districts in Pulaski county will be required to expend state and local revenue on special education students \"in accordance with existing federal and state laws and department regulations\" and based further upon criteria including a formula derived from a three year average percentage. The three districts in Pulaski County have three year average special education expenditures which are more than double those required by Act 917. ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 35: Neither the expenditure requirements of Act 917 for special education nor the distribution of aid that could be utilized for special education factor in the actual education expenditures of these three school districts. ADE's Response: This \"fact\" is unintelligible and is therefore disputed. 17 Fact No. 36: Act 917, at Section 3, established four categories of State funding. The first is State Equalization Funding for students. The last category, Category 4, is Student Needs Funding. Section 3 prohibits funding Category 4 until Categories 1, 2 and 3 are fully funded. ADE's Response: Undisputed. ... . Fact No. 37: During its last session, the Arkansas Legislature appropriated $250,000,000 for students (sic) needs funding. However, Section 29 of Act 1194 authorized the Director of the Department of Education to transfer funds from one category to another. The Director has transferred all $250,000,000 from Category 4 to Category 1. There will be no distribution of student needs funding during 1996-97. ADE's Response: Section 29 of Act 1194 authorizes the Director of ADE to request appropriation transfers and other budget-related adjustments with the approval of the Chief Fiscal Officer of the State and after review by the Arkansas Legislative Council. With that qualification, Fact No. 37 is undisputed. The transfer of $250,000 from Category 4 to Category 1 was done because Category 1 was not fully funded and, pursuant to Section 3(a) of Act 917, the $250,000 appropriated for Student Needs Funding could not have been distributed to school districts at all unless it was moved to Category 1. 18  Fact No. 38: Act 917, at Section 4( v) defines Student Needs Funding to include \"[T]he amount of state financial aid provided to each Local School District from available Special Education funding.\" ADE's Response: Undisputed. However, section 3(i) of Act 917 (Ark. Code Ann. 6-20-309(a)) expressly permits school districts to expend Category 1 funds for \"student needs funding.\" Fact No, 39: There are three ways to identify at-risk children within a district: (I) low test scores, (2) the number of children receiving free or reduced lunches within a district, and (3) the number of households below the poverty level within a district. (Imber, Finding of Fact No. 137) ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No. 40: At page 13, the ABS contains the following commentary by the Arkansas Department of Education: \"State Equalization Aid the priority request of$79,255,218 in FY98 and $157,750,338 in FY99 provides for a 6% increase each fiscal year and for the continuation of $5,203,218 budgeted from FY97 fund balances for potential desegregation cost.\" ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 41: At-Risk Grants and Training - Act 917 of 1995 (The Equitable School Finance Act of 1995) and Act 1194 of 1995 (Appropriation Act for the Public School Fund) eliminated at-risk funding as a separate line item and 19 - combined approximately $30 million into the State Equalization Funding fonnula. The Department is requesting that this be established as a line item once more at $17,100,000 each year (ABS p. 23). ADE's Response: Disputed. While the Districts have accurately quoted page 11 of ABS, the statement is incorrect. There are no identifiable or earmarked \"At-Risk Grants and Training\" dollars distributed as state equalization funding. Fact No. 42: Acts 917 and 1194 for 1995 eliminated all at-risk funding from the Department of Education's budget and shifted approximately $30,000,000 into State equalization aid (ABS p. 11) ADE's Response: Disputed. While the Districts have accurately quoted page 11 of ABS, the statement is incorrect. There are no identifiable or eannarked \"At-Risk Grants and Training\" dollars distributed as state equalization funding. Fact No, 43: Act 1194, at Item 28, reflects a $30,000,000 appropriation for at-risk grants and training for 1995-96, the last year that Act 34 operated. ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 44: Page 44 of the ABS reflects actual expenditures for at-risk grants and training in 1995-96 of $29,784,239. ADE's Response: Undisputed. 20 . - Fact No, 45: Act 917 defines at-risk funding as \"Financial aid provided to Local School Districts based upon the number of students with low test scores, the number of children receiving free or reduced price lunches, the number of households below the poverty level, or the number of children with limited English proficiency.\" ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 46: Act 1194 appropriated $34,000,000 for at-risk grants and training for 1995-96. There was no appropriation for this category for 1996- 97. ADE's Response: Disputed. See Section 1, Item (28) of Act 1194 of 1995. Fact No, 47: Grants to School Districts - These payments are made to Missouri for educating students in North Arkansas who can't get to their assigned district because Bull Shoals Lake separates them from their district, and it would require a round trip of more than 35 miles. This program was incorporated into the school funding formula, but the Department is requesting a separate line item of$27,000 for the 1997-99 biennium (ABS p. 34). ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 48: In Act 1194, $27,000 was appropriated for \"grants to school districts\" for 1995-96, the last year of operation of Act 34. 21 . . # ' . - -- ADE's Response: Undisputed. Fact No, 49: Mr. Charles Dyer is Superintendent of the Alma School District. Mr. Dyer was Superintendent of the Alma School District when Alma v, Dupree was tried. It is Mr. Dyer's understanding that moneys previously distributed as MFP A, transportation funds, teacb\"er retirement payments, and health insurance payments, all as previously made under Act 34, were put into one large pool to be distributed pursuant to Act 917. ADE's Response: It is undisputed that Mr. Dyer testified that this is his \"understanding.\" Mr. Dyer's \"understanding,\" however, is incorrect. Moreover, because Mr. Dyer is not a legislator or a state official his ''understanding\" has no probative value concerning the intent of the Arkansas Legislature, and does not bind or estopp the State. Fact No. 50: It is Mr. Dyer's understanding that together with additional money of approximately $60,000,000, that all of this added up to the appropriation of $1,300,000,000. ADE's Response: It is undisputed that Mr. Dyer testified that this is his ''understanding.\" Mr. Dyer's ''understanding,\" however, is incorrect. Moreover, because Mr. Dyer is not a legislator or a state official his ''understanding\" has no probative value concerning the intent of the Arkansas Legislature, and does not bind or estopp the State. 22 Fact No, 51: It is the sworn testimony of Dr. Bobbie Davis that the total dollars that previously went to public schools under Act 34 were all consolidated into equalization funding under Act 917. (Davis deposition, pp. 6-7). ADE's Response: Disputed. The cited testimony related specifically to transportation aid, and Dr. Davis also testified iliat there are no specifically earmarked or identifiable funds for transportation being distributed as equalization funding. Davis Deposition, pp. 6-7. Fact No, 52: 1996 is accurate. Exhibit \"F\" to the Districts' reply dated December 23, ADE's Response: Disputed. See Greene Declaration,~ 2 and 7 and Exh.A. Fact No, 53: Even though the Newark School District will not receive state equalization funding, it will nevertheless receive State aid in the form of additional base funding so that its expenditures per student will be at the minimum level required by the State. ADE's Response: Disputed. The Newark school district will receive additional base funding for 1996-97 because, due to a \"quirk\" in Act 917, Newark's total state and local revenue per ADM for 1996-97 is less than the minimum state and local revenue per ADM as defined by Act 917. See Section 3(e) of Act 917 of 1995 (Ark. Code Ann. 6-20-308). As a result of the 23  enactment of Amendment 74 to the Arkansas Constitution, Newark will receive no additional base funding for 1997-98. See Greene Declaration, ,i 3. Fact No. 54: In terms oflocal wealth, Newark is either the richest or second richest school district in the state. ADE's Response: lfthe Districts are defining \"local wealth\" as base local revenue per student calculated at a millage rate of 25 mills, Fact No. 54 is undisputed. Fact No. 55: Newark votes a millage of23.6 mills. This millage rate does not result in an amount of money per student sufficient to satisfy present state expenditure per student requirements. ADE's Response: Disputed. Newark's millage for purposes of 1996-97 state funding was 19.28 mills, and as a result Newark's total state and local revenue per ADM for 1996-97 was less than the minimum state and local revenue per ADM as defined by Act 917. See Section 3(e) of Act 917 of 1995 (Ark. Code Ann.  6-20-308). As a result of the ratification of Amendment 74 to the Arkansas Constitution, however, Newark's maintenance and operation millage has been increased to 25 mills and it will receive no additional base funding for 1997-98. See Greene Declaration, ,i 3. Fact No. 56: The three Districts in Pulaski County all vote millages approximately 20 mills higher than the Newark School District. 24 ADE's Response; Disputed, particularly after the effect of millage rollbacks and Amendment 74 are taken into account. See Greene Declaration,, 4. Fact No, 57: The three Districts in Pulaski County vote millages that are among the highest in the State. Only four other districts exceed the millage rate voted in LRSD-and PCSSD. ADE's Response: Disputed. See Greene Declaration,, 4. Fact No, 58: The Umpire School District has one of the smallest student bodies in t "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_153","title":"Arkansas Department of Education's Executive Summary, Semiannual Monitoring Report","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["1997-02-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Pulaski County (Ark.)--History--20th century","Education--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Educational statistics","School integration","Education and state","Little Rock (Ark.). Office of Desegregation Monitoring"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Department of Education's Executive Summary, Semiannual Monitoring Report"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/153"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nl1 =~i~ 1 t 1 I I ARKANSAS DEPARTMEN-,- '\"'rEDUCATION'S EXECUT SUMMARY NLRSD. LRSD PCSSD SEMIANNUAL. MONITORING REPORT: FEBRUARY 1, 1997 \u0026lt;, _ DWlCOel - f :~ JI ~:::: :,:, ~t ':: ~~=::~::: I:, :: rr   PROGRESS: CURRENT STATUS OF THE CYCLE ONE SCHOOLS IN PULASKI COUNTY A STATISTICAL REVIEW 2 l 11 II ~f:::~:::: t~1iIi,r : 1,: ~ ::\"\n,:'@\n: Ii I 1,,,: { l~lilIiI. 11  J :\n::  - ,,   A: ENROLLMENT/ATTENDANCE SUMMARY 1. Enrollment by race, gender, school, grade, transported, non-transported and instructional program CYCLE ONE ENROLLMENT - LRSD 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 ENROLLED TRANS  Black Male VVhite Male Other Male NON-TRANS INSTR. PROG 3 Black Female White Female Other Female ..  - , A: ENROLLMENT/ATTENDANCE SUMMARY Enrollment by race, gender, school, grade, transported, non-transported and instructional program CYCLE ONE ENROLLMENT - NLRSD 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 ENROLLED TRANS Black Male White Male Other Male 4 NON-TRANS INSTR. PROG Black Female White Female Other Female 1 .  . A: ENROLLMENT/ATTENDANCE SUMMARY Enrollment by race, gender, school, grade, transported, non-transported and instructional program 2000 1500 1000 500 0 CYCLE ONE ENROLLMENT - PCSSD ENROLLED TRANS  Black Male \\Nhite Male Other Male NON-TRANS INSTR. P.ROG Black Female \\Nhite Female Other Female A: ENROLLMENT/ATTENDANCE SUMMARY 2. Enrollment by race, gender, grade, transported, non-transported and instructional programs for each magnet school. 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 MAGNESTC HOOLE NROLLMENT ENROLLED TRANS Black Male White Male Other Male NON-TRANS INSTR. PROG 6 Black Female White Female Other Female A: ENROLLMENT/ATTENDANCE SUMMARY 2. Enrollment by race, gender, grade, transported, non-transported and instructional programs for each magnet school. MAGNETSCHOOLENROLLMENT-PCSSD 200 150 100 50 0 ENROLLED TRANS NON-TRANS INSTR. PROG Black Male White Male Other Male 7  Black Female  White Female II Other Female . : f:_,.: _,, i: :i::~_.:.:.: :!_~. l!l ll::: II=J ==: ~ 1 1I ,It, ~ i '1 I I I, II I ._._:,_:_:_:_ ::::  A. ENROLLMENT/ATTENDANCE SUMMARY 3. Number of non-promotes by race, gender, grade, school, teacher, transported and non-transported 50 40 30 20 10 0 CYCLE ONE NON-PROMOTES - LRSD NON-PROMOTES TRANS NON-TRANS Black Male  Black Female  White Male ~--~ White Female I,@! Other Male ~ .l~~ Other Female 8 A. ENROLLMENT/ATTENDANCE SUMMARY 3. Number of non-promotes by race, gender, grade, school, teacher, transported and non-transported 4 3 2 1 0 CYCLE ONE NON-PROMOTES - NLRSD NON-PROMOTES TRANS Black Male White Male Other Male NON-TRANS - Black Female 9 White Female Other Female ,. ..  A. ENROLLMENT/ATTENDANCE SUMMARY 3. Number of non-promotes by race, gender, grade, school, teacher, transported and non-transported CYCLE ONE NON-PROMOTES - PCSSD 100 80 60 40 20 0 ~~~ NON-PROMOTES TRANS  WBlhaictek MMaallee --- ~ p \u0026lt;:Y\u0026lt;~.~mmi::?~: ~ Other Male l0/~. .0? .i\u0026amp;\" i~z~~ 10 NON-TRANS Black Female White Female Other Female  B. TEST DATA SUMMARY 5. Number of 11th \u0026amp; 12th graders by race and gender, school and guidance counselor who take the PSAT, SAT or ACT. NUMBER OF STUDENTS TAKING TESTS IN CYCLE ONE - LRSD PSAT Black Male White Male  Other Male ~*==~:-\"=:~\n,\nSAT ACT Black Female -a White Female II  Other Female 11  B. TEST DATA SUMMARY 1~ .,',I 5. Number of 11th \u0026amp; 12th graders by race and gender, school and guidance counselor who take the I I I I I I PSAT, SAT or ACT. Note: Cycle One schools in NLRSD were all elementary schools, thus the PSAT, SAT and ACT were not administered. 12 B. TEST DATA SUMMARY 5. Number of 11th \u0026amp; 12th graders by race and gender, school and guidance counselor who take the PSAT, SAT or ACT. NUMBER OF STUDENTS TAKING TESTS IN CYCLE ONE - PCSSD PSAT SAT ACT Black Male Black Female White Male ~-f?z ~ ~ White Female  Other Male ~~~~-.0, :~% -Other Female 13 r .J ' C: STAFF SUMMARY 1. Number of Full Time Equivalent (F.T.E.) classroom teachers by race, gender, school, years of experience. CYCLE ONE F.T.E. TEACHERS  Cumulative Years of Experience NLRSD LRSD PCSSD  NLRSD - 1,247 Black Male  Black Female . .  LRSD - 3,546  White Male  White Female  PCSSD - 3,780 (I ~:-~ Other Male  Other Female 14 C. STAFF SUMMARY 2. Number of F.T.E. school-based administrators by job category, race, gender, school, years of experience.  Cumulative Years of Experience  NLRSD = 128  LRSD = 377  PCSSD = 357 CYCLE ONE F.T.E. SCHOOL-BASED ADMINISTRATORS 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 NLRSD LRSD PCS SD 15 , .. C. STAFF SUMMARY 3. Number of F.T.E. counselors by race, gender, school, years of  Cumulative Years of Experience  NLRSD = 64  LRSD = 277  PCSSD = 233 10 8 6 4 . expenence. CYCLE ONE F.T.E. COUNSELORS ~it~--~~-~~ NLRSD  Black Male ~~ Wh1'te Male ~4~ li:J~\nt@~ MO ther Male 16 LRSD PCS SD Black Female ~B,W El White Female !:I _,f.~_i_,. i I ~ II :_:_i_\n_! l:II ti ' I ~ I :::: I !:Ji : I Iii r C. STAFF SUMMARY 4. Number of F.T.E. kindergarten teachers by race, gender, school, years of experience.  Cumulative Years of Experience  NLRSD = 144  LRSD = 295 Note: All Cycle One schools in PCSSD are secondary thus no kindergarten programs are reflected. CYCLE ONE F.T.E. KINDERGARTEN TEACHERS NLRSD LRSD Black Male  Black Female [B~ ,:,\n,\n~ White Male  White Female \"i'-?\"~~~  z,~:i-\"~ ~i~~J. Other Male Other Female\n::~?~~~   C. STAFF SUMMARY 5. Number of F.T.E. librarians by race, gender, school, years of e Cumulative Years of Experience e NLRSD = 62 e LRSD = 191 e PCSSD = 125 . expenence. CYCLE ONE F.T.E. LIBRARIANS NLRSD LRSD PCSSD Black Male II Black Female  White Male  White Female  Other Male  Other Female 18  C: STAFF SUMMARY 6. Number of F.T.E. department heads by race, gender, school, years of e Cumulative Years of Experience e LRSD = 311 e PCSSD = 683 . expenence CYCLE ONE F.T.E. DEPARTMENT HEAD LRSD Black Male  White Male  Other Male 19  PCSSD II Black Female White Female Other Female I ==,,,_:,:==,,,_:,'._-==,,,i-~,:=,,:_ 1  lI:,,l,!,l ~--- 11 ~:!:! I1r1 I=-= IItt If 1,,\n 11111 %.~I ~\n)\n-:-: ==~ ~ i I ~ 11  i.,,_:1,,,,,:_.: 1111 ) C. STAFF SUMMARY 7. Number of F.T.E. secretaries by race, gender, school, years of e Cumulative Years of Experience e NLRSD = 101 e LRSD = 275 e PCSSD = 365 . expenence. CYCLE ONE F.T.E. SECRETARIES 30 25 20 15 1gi l~--~~-~~~ NLRSD LRSD PCSSD  Black Male  Black Female  ~ ~~~?: White Male  White Female ~~#,m~m.x- if.@~~ Other Male - Other Female 20 T ) C: STAFF SUMMARY 8. Number of F.T.E. central office positions by job category, race, gender, school, years of experience. CENTRAL OFFICE POSITIONS  Cumulative Years of Experience  NLRSD = 477  LRSD = 1,245  PCSSD = 299 NLRSD LRso PCSSD  Black Male  Black Female iw .\u0026amp;. .-M:W ~W~ hite Male ,,. White Female ~~ Other Male  Other Fem ale ~~?.=~~ ,:1/.:.,\n::::::. 21  D. POLICY AND PROGRAM INFORMATION District policies, rules and regulations. 22 E. BUDGET INFORMATION 1. Cost of operating all elementary programs, junior high school programs, and high school programs by funding source (local/regular state/federal and special state desegregation funding). 2. Transportation Cost and Funding Source. 3. All legal fees reported by type of services. 4. Compensatory Education Program Costs. 5. Magnet School Costs. 23 PULASKI COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTS TOTAL PROGRAM OPERATING COST FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES LOCAUSTATE FEDERAL LEA# SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS LEGAL PROGRAM DISTRICT PROGRAM 6~01 LITTlE ROCK 59,499,209 31,474,967 6,464,867 328,745 3,469,669 3,011,807 5,224,242 ~02 NORTH LITTlE ROCK 29,067,633 9,851,918 1,264,088 21,980 1,975,332 1,192,347 1,491,606 6~03 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL 58,635,805 20,711,728 5,733,229 111,498 2,242,921 1,370,124 3,967,329 Funding Categories Local \u0026amp; State This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. Federal Desag This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. This category consists or funding for desegregation purposes. Expense Categories DESEGREGATION DISTRICT INCENTIVE MAGNET TRANS 7,789,126 7,618,145 14,752,306 2,720,432 232,811 0 0 301,541 5,206,530 0 0 1,553,100 Local \u0026amp; State This category consists or expenses incurred relative to regular program expense, district expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded by unrestricted local, state and federal sources. This category consists or expenses incurred relative to federal program expense and district expense funded by restricted federal sources. LEGAL TOTAL 287,003 142,640,518 98,366 45,497,622 295,802 99,828,066 Federal Desag This category consists or expenses incurred relative to desegregation program expense, district expense, incentive school expense, magnet expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded from desegregation sources. Total Category FY 95196 The totals in this column represent the total expense for each school district for fiscal year 1995/1996. SOURCES: The Finance Offices or each or the school districts in Pulaski County. 24 PULASKI COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTS TOTAL PROGRAM OPERATING BUDGET FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES LOCAUSTATE FEDERAL DESEGREGATION LEA# SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS LEGAL PROGRAM DISTRICT PROGRAM DISTRICT INCENTIVE MAGNET TRANS LEGAL 60-01 LITTLE ROCK 67.909,531 32,888,201 6,026,174 219,950 3,053,330 4,114,111 6.449, 163 9,458,364 8,638,910 17,361,466 2,866,793 195,050 60-02 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 32,906,692 14,022,001 1,742,631 35,000 2,164,666 1,406,182 804,070 345,556 0 0 369,312 85,000 60-03 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL 70.573,372 16,480,963 5,865,352 155,000 3,501,563 945,075 5.681, 797 4,831,645 0 0 1,761,205 260,000 Funding Categories Local \u0026amp; State This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. Federal This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. Deseg This category consists of funding for desegregation purposes. Expense Categories Local \u0026amp; State This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to regular program expense, district expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded by unrestricted local, slate and federal sources. Federal This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to federal program expense and district expense funded by restricted federal sources. Deseg This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to desegregation program expense, district expense, incentive expense, magnet expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded from desegregation sources. Total Category FY 96197 SOURCE: The totals in this column represent the total budget for each school district for fiscal year 199611997. The Finance Offices of each of the school districts In Pulaski County. 25 TOTAL 159,201,043 53 883,33tl 112 075,972 LEA# 60-01 60-02 60-03 PULASKI COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTS TRANSPORTATION EXPENSE FY 95196 FUNDING SOURCES LOCAL\u0026amp; DISTRICT STATE FEDERAL DESEG LITTLE ROCK 6,464,867 0 2,720,432 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 1,264,088 0 301,541 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL 5,619,517 0 1,666,812 TRANSPORTATION FY 95/96 10000000 8000000 6000000 4000000 2000000 0 Funding Categories RATIO OF TRANS EXP TOTAL TO TOTAL EXP 9,185,299 6.4% 1,565,629 3.4% 7,286,329 7.3% Local \u0026amp; State This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. Federal This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. Oeseg This category consists of funding for desegregation purposes. Expense Categories Local \u0026amp; State This category consists of transportation costs incurred relative to programs funded by unrestricted local, state and federal sources. Federal This category consists of transportation costs funded by restricted federal sources. 08$eg This category consists of transportation costs incurred relative to desegregationp rogramsf unded by desegregation sources. Total Category FY 951'96 This category consists of the district's total transportation expense for FY 95/96. Ratio of Transportation Expense to Total Expense FY 951'96 This category indicates the percentage of total district costs attributable to the transportation function. SOURCES: The Finance Offices of each of the school districts in Pulaski County. 26 PULASKI COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTS TRANSPORTATION BUDGET FY 96197 FUNDING SOURCES RATIO OF LOCAL\u0026amp; TRANS BUDGET TO LEA# DISTRICT STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL TOTAL BUDGET 60-01 LITTLE ROCK 6,026,174 0 2,886,793 60-02 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 1,742,631 0 369,312 60-03 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL 5,865,352 0 1,781,205 Funding Categories TRANSPORTATION 10000000 8000000 6000000 4000000 2000000 0 FY 96/97 8,912,967 5.6% 2,111,943 3.9% 7,646,557 6.8% Local \u0026amp; State This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. Federal This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. Deseg This category consists of funding for desegregation purposes. Expense Categories Local \u0026amp; State This category consists of budgeted transportation costs relative to programs funded by unrestricted local, state and federal sources. Federal This category consists of budgeted transportation costs funded by restricted federal sources. Deseg This category consists of budgeted transportation costs relative to desegregation programs funded by desegregation sources. Total Category FY96197 This category consists of the district's total transportation budget for FY 96/97. Ratio of Transportation Budget to Total Budget FY96197 SOURCES: This category indicates the percentage of the district's total budget for FY 96/97 attributable to the transportation function. The Finance Offices of each of the school districts in Pulaski County. 27 PULASKI COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTS LEGAL EXPENSE FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES RATIO OF LEGAL LOCAL\u0026amp; EXP TO TOTAL LEA# 60-01 60-02 60-03 DISTRICT LITTLE ROCK NORTH LITTLE ROCK PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL 800000 600000 400000 200000 0 Funding Categories STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL 328,745 0 287,003 615,748 21,980 0 98,366 120,346 111,498 0 295,802 407,300 LEGAL FY 95/96 Local \u0026amp; State This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. Federal This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. Deseg This category consists of funding for desegregation purposes. Expense Categories EXPENSE 0.4% 0.3% 0.4% Local \u0026amp; State This category consists of legal expenses incurred relative to programs funded by unrestricted local, state and federal sources. Federal This category consists of legal expenses funded by restricted federal sources. Deseg This category consists of legal expenses incurred relative to desegregation programs funded by desegregation sources. Total Category FY 95196 This category consists of the district's total legal expense for FY 95/96. Ratio of Legal Expense to Total Expense FY 95196 This category indicates the percentage of total district costs attributable to legal fees. SOURCES: The Finance Offices of each of the school districts in Pulaski County. 28 ' PULASKI COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTS LEGAL BUDGET FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES RATIO OF LEGAL LOCAL\u0026amp; BUDGET TO LEA# DISTRICT STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL TOTAL BUDGET 60-01 LITTLE ROCK 60-02 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 60-03 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL Funding Categories 500000 400000 300000 200000 100000 0 219,950 0 195,050 415,000 35,000 0 85,000 120,000 155,000 0 260,000 415,000 LEGAL FY 96/97 Local \u0026amp; State This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. Federal This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. Deseg This category consists of funding for desegregation purposes. Expense Categories 0.3% 0.2% 0.4% Local \u0026amp; State This category consists of budgeted legal expenses relative to programs funded by unrestricted local, state and federal sources. Federal This category consists of budgeted legal expenses funded by restricted federal sources. Deseg This category consists of budgeted legal expenses relative to desegregation programs funded by desegregation sources. Total Category FY9~7 This category consists of the district's total legal budget for FY 96/97. Ratio of Legal Budget to Total Budget FY9~7 SOURCES: This category indicates the percentage of the total district budget for FY 96/97 attributable to legal fees. The Finance Offices of each of the school districts in Pulaski County. 29 l .. LEA# 60-01 60-02 60-03 Total Deseg Expense Comp Ed Expense CompEdPmts ofCompEd ExptoDeseg Expense SOURCES: PULASKI COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTS DISTRICT LITTLE ROCK NORTH LITTLE ROCK PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL COMPENSATORY EDUCATION FY 95/96 TOTAL DESEGREGATION COMP ED EXPENSE EXPENSE 38,391,254 5,368,944 2,124,324 603,567 10,807,566 3,000,000 COMP ED EXPENSE FY 95/96 6000000 4000000 2000000 0 The total desegregation expense incurred in FY 95/96. Compensatory Education expense incurred in FY 96/97. COMPEDPMTS FROM ADE IN FY95/96 4,970,262 389,025 0 Compensatory Education payments by the ADE to the district in FY 95/96. Ratio of Compensatory Education expense to desegregation expense for FY 95/96. The Finance Offices of each of the school districts in Pulaski County, the ADE General Finance Section, the ADE Local Fiscal Services Section, and the ADE Lead Planning \u0026amp; Desegregation Monitoring Section. 30 PERCENT OF COMPED EXP TO DESEG EXP 14.0% 28.4% 27.8% ' .. PULASKI COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTS COMPENSATORY EDUCATION FY 96/97 TOTAL DESEGREGATION COMPED LEA# DISTRICT BUDGET BUDGET 60-01 LITTLE ROCK 44,989,746 6,518,001 60-02 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 1,603,938 1,149,626 60-03 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL 12,554,647 3,236,036 COMP ED BUDGET 8000000 6000000 4000000 2000000 0 FY 96/97 Total Deseg The total desegregation budget for FY 96/97. Expense Comp Ed Compensatory Education budget for FY 96/97. Expense COMPEDPMTS FROM ADE IN FY96/97 2,527,936 0 0 PERCENT OF COMP ED BUDGET TO DESEG BUDGET  14.5% 71.7% 25.8% Comp Ed Pmts Compensatory Education payments made by the ADE to the district in FY 96/97 in accordance with the Settlement Agreement. \" of Comp Ed Ratio of Compensatory Education budget to total desegregation budget for FY 96/97. Exp toDeseg Expense SOURCES: The Finance Offices of eech of the school districts in Pulaski County, the ADE General Finance Section, the ADE Lace/ Fiscal Services Section, end the ADE Lead Planning \u0026amp; Desegregation Monitoring Section. 31 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT MAGNET SCHOOLS MAGNET SCHOOL PROGRAM EXPENSE FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES LOCAL\u0026amp; LEA# SCHOOL STATE FEDERAL 6001003 MANN JR. HIGH 0 0 6001005 PARKVlEW HIGH 0 0 6001006 BOOKER ELEM 0 0 6001021 CARVER ELEM 0 0 6001027 GIBBS ELEM 0 0 6001043 WILLIAMS ELEM 0 0- TOTAL MAGNET EXPENSE 0 0 MAGNET EXPENSE Funding Categories 4000000 3000000 2000000 1000000 0 FY 95/96 DESEG 3,351,297 3,699,919 2,366,402 2,109,225 1,324,125 1,901,338 1-4,752,306 TOTAL FY 95/96 3,351,297 3,699,919 2,366,402 2,109,225 1,324,125 1,901,338 14,752,306 Local \u0026amp; State This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. Federal This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. Deseg This category consists of funding for desegregation purposes. Expense Categories Local \u0026amp; State This category consists of expenses incurred relative to magnet programs funded by unrestricted local, state and federal sources. Federal This category consists of magnet program expenses funded by restricted federal sources. Deseg This category consists of expenses incurred relative to magnet programs funded from desegregation sources. Total Category FY 95196 SOURCES: The totals in this column represent the total program expense for each magnet school for fiscal year 1995/1996. The Lltt1e Rock School District Finance O/Tice and the Local Fiscal Services DMsion of the ADE. 32 .. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT MAGNET SCHOOLS MAGNET SCHOOL PROGRAM BUDGET FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES LOCAL \u0026amp; LEA# SCHOOL STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL 6001003 MANN JR. HIGH 0 0 3,808,689 3,808,689 6001005 PARKVIEW HIGH - 0 0 4,357,849 4,357,849 6001006 BOOKER ELEM 0 0 2,814,752 2,814,752 6001021 CARVER ELEM 0 0 2,530,286 2,530,286 6001027 GIBBS ELEM 0 -0 1,611,483 1,611,483 6001043 WILLIAMS ELEM 0 0 2,238.407 2,238.407 TOTAL MAGNET BUDGET 0 0 17,361.466 17,361.466 MAGNET BUDGET FY 96/97 5000000 4000000 3000000 2000000 1000000 0 Funding Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. This category consists of funding for desegregation purposes. Expense Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg Total Category FY 96197 SOURCES: This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to magnet programs funded by unrestricted local, state and federal sources. This category consists of budgeted magnet program expenses funded by restricted federal sources. This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to magnet programs funded from desegregation sources. The totals in this column represent the total budget for each magnet school for fiscal year 1996/1997. The Lrltle Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 33 Iii l!IJlllilH I i 11 11111 I==== l::I ~,::: Wz:::: I ~1111 ~:::: I !Ill I  F. STUDENT DISCIPLINE Student Expulsions according to type of infractions, length of punishment by race, gender, school and teacher. 2 1 0 DISCIPLINE: PCSSO EXPULSIONS (1st Qtr 96-97) Grade 10 Grade 11 Black Male White Male Other Male 35 . Grade 12 Black Female White Female Other Female I I ! 1,:,__:_i:'_1 11 It :::: ~? ~11:1,:1 . ~Ji!)! 1111 I i G. PERCEPTUAL DATA Results of survey to ascertain perception toward school quality, school services, district and building leadership, special state funded programs and educational equity summarized by race, gender, attendance zone, school and grade. UTILIZATION OF PERCEPTUAL DATA - LRSD 36 ..  G. PERCEPTUAL DATA Results of survey to ascertain perception toward school quality, school services, district and building leadership, special state funded programs and educational equity summarized by race, gender, attendance zone, school and grade. UTILIZATION OF PERCEPTUAL DATA - NLRSD 37 G. PERCEPTUAL DATA Results of survey to ascertain perception toward school quality, school services, district and building leadership, special state funded programs and educational equity summarized by race, gender, attendance zone, school and grade. UTILIZATION OF PERCEPTUAL DATA - PCSSD 38 ....., ... EXTENDED COE MONITORING FOURTEEN QUALITATIVE ELEMENTS RESULTS OF THE FOURTEEN QUALITATIVE ELEMENTS EVIDENCE IN THE ALLEN LETTER YES NO NIA-I. Evidence that policies, procedures, rules and regulations are developed and implemented to facilitate 21 I desegregation. 2. E\\idence that plans related to reducing achievement disparity between black and non-black students are 10 12 progressively successful. 3. Evidence that student assignments to schools, classes and programs at each organizational level are made without 22 bias. 4. Evidence that staff de\\'elopment days authorized as a result of the Agreement are used to facilitate the 22 desegregation process. 5. Evidence that travel time to and from schools is not disproportionate among black and non-black students and the percentage of black students transported for desegregation is not significantly greater than the percentage of non- 22 black students transported for desegregation. 6. Evidence that guidance and counseling is designed to meet the needs of a diverse student population. 21 I 7. Evidence of internal procedures for ensuring that materials for appraising or counseling students are non- 22 discriminatory. 39\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_259","title":"Arkansas Department of Education's Semiannual Monitoring Report, Volume 1","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["1997-02-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Educational statistics","Education and state","Education--Evaluation"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Department of Education's Semiannual Monitoring Report, Volume 1"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/259"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n,J\n , ~....N. ~\"~~~~~ ~~ ~\n~i~~~:,,a.:~~,,~ J~:, .~~~. . S11!~~~!1~~l~~~ x~1\\l~~~~~~x-~~:~~~:~ ~~~ ~, .~. { ,t1~~ ~S~-0:: ~~,i~~~i ~ ~ ~ :4ffe'\"\"'\"'AJ CONTENTS VOLUME I Monitoring Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Enrollment/ Attendance Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Little Rock School District Transported and Non-Transported . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 North Little Rock School District Transported and Non-Transported . . . . . . 61 Pulaski Co. Special School District Transported and Non-Transported . . . 104 Little Rock School District Instructional Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 North Little Rock School District Instructional Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174 Pulaski Co. Special School District Instructional Program .... . . . . . . . . . . 216 Magnet Schools Instructional Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234 Little Rock School District 1995-96 Non-Promotes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258 North Little Rock School District 1995-96 Non-Promotes ............... 277 Pulaski Co. Special School District 1995-96 Non-Promotes .............. 284 Test Data Number of 11th \u0026amp; 12th Graders Who Took The PSAT, SAT or ACT 301 Little Rock School District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 302 Pulaski Co. Special School District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308 Staff Cycle I Schools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323 Staff Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 324 Little Rock School District Classroom Teachers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 325 North Little Rock School District Classroom Teachers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 358 Pulaski Co. Special School District Classroom Teachers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 379 Little Rock School District School Based Administrators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 399 North Little Rock School District School Based Administrators .......... 415 Pulaski Co. Special School District School Based Administrators . . . . . . . . . 424 Little Rock School District Counselors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 436 North Little Rock School District Counselors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 446 Pulaski Co. Special School District Counselors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 453 CONTENTS Little Rock School District Kindergarten Teachers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 458 North Little Rock School District Kindergarten Teachers ............... 472 Little Rock School District Librarians . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 482 North Little Rock School District Librarians . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 491 Pulaski Co. Special School District Librarians 498 Little Rock School District Department Heads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 503 Pulaski Co. Special School District Department Heads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 506 Little Rock School District Secretaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 519 North Little Rock School District Secretaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 531 Pulaski Co. Special School District Secretaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 541 Little Rock School District Central Office Personnel ........ .-. . . . . . . . . . 553 North Little Rock School District Central Office Personnel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 579 Pulaski Co. Special School District Central Office Personnel . . . . . . . . . . . . 588 Policy Information Composite of the Cycle I Schools in Pulaski County . . . . . . . . 595 L MONITORING OVERVIEW During the 1996-97 school year, the Director of the Arkansas Department of Education selected monitoring teams for the Pulaski County School Districts to monitor these districts in accordance with the Department's Implementation Plan. Monitoring teams were assigned to intensively monitor Cycle I schools. The following are the 22 schools assigned to Cycle I. Little Rock School District (10) Baseline Elementary, David O' Dodd Elementary, Fair Park Elementary, Forest Park Elementary, J. A. Fair High School, Jefferson Elementary, Parkview Magnet High School, Pulaski Heights Elementary, Terry Elementary and Wilson Elementary. North Little Rock School District (7) Belwood Elementary, Boone Park Elementary, Glenview Elementary, North Heights Elementary, Park Hill Elementary Pike View Elementary, and Redwood Elementary. Pulaski County Special School District (5) Jacksonville High School North Pulaski Junior High Oak Grove High School Sylvan Hills Junior High, and Sylvan Hills High School. IL MONITORING PROCESS A. MONITORING SCHEDULE The monitoring teams visited schools in accordance with an established schedule of announced visits. Announced visits were scheduled from October 28 1996 to December 5 1996. Monitors conducted monitoring visits using instruments developed to align with the established criteria for the Extended Comprehensive Outcomes Evaluation (ECOE). Prior to the initiation of monitoring, the Office of Education Lead 1 Planning and Desegregation provided training to all Cycle I administrators and central office personnel in each school district. Monitors completed classroom observations, a principal's interview, and a document reYiew process at each school. The school document review process was refined by the establishment of the Tri-District Data Collection Committee and the development of a common terminology document for the fourteen qualitative data elements identified on Pages 3 8-41 of the Implementation Plan, and pages 4-5 of the Allen Letter. Accordingly, the ADE identified and monitored the following: 1. Evidence that policies. procedures. rules and regulations are developed and implemented to facilitate desegregation. 2. Evidence that plans related to reducing achievement disparity between black and non-black students are progressively successful. 3. Evidence that student assignments to schools, classes and programs at each organizational level are made without bias. 4. Evidence that staff development days authorized as a result of the Agreement are used to facilitate the desegregation process. 5. Evidence that travel time to and from schools is not disproportionate among black and non-black students and the percentage of black students transported for desegregation is not significantly greater than the percentage of non-black students transported for desegregation is not significantly greater than the percentage of non-black students transported for desegregation. 6. Evidence that guidance and counseling is designed to meet the needs of a diverse student population. 2 7. Evidence of internal procedures for ensuring that materials for appraising or counseling students are nondiscriminatory. 8. Evidence that curricular content and instructional strategies are utilized to meet the diverse needs of the student population served. 9. Evidence that personnel is recruited, employed and assigned in a manner to meet the goals of a desegregating school district. 10. Evidence that procedures related to extracurricular and cocurricula activities are developed and implemented to identify and eliminate conditions that result in participation that is disproportionate to the student population. 11. Evidence of diverse representation on appointed districtwide and school-based committees. 12. Evidence of efforts to ensure that parent attendance at school functions is not disproportionate to the student population. 13. Evidence of success related to 1ajority to Minority transfers. 14. Evidence that magnet schools are an effective inter-district remedy for racial balance. Results of the announced monitoring for the fourteen elements are included in the ECOE monitoring section of this report. 3 B. ENROLLMENT/ATTENDANCE DATA The Allen Letter requires the collection of the following Attendance/Enrollment data from the three Pulaski Count School Districts. 1. Enrollment by race. gender. schooL grade, transported, nontransported and instructional programs. 2. Enrollment by race, gender, grade. transported, nontransported and instructional program for each magnet school. This data follows for each of the Cycle I schools. 3. Number of non promotes by ra e. gender, grade, school, teacher, transported and nontransported. Concept Definition: For the purposes of desegregation monitoring, the Arkansas Department of Education, orth Little Rock School District, Little Rock School District -and Pulaski County Special School District defined an instructional program as follows: A combination of courses and experiences that is designed to accomplish a predetermined objective or set of allied objectives. The three districts have agreed that for the purposes of this report, Compensatory Education costs are the costs that are funded from the special funds received from the ADE for Compensatory Education as specified by the Settlement Agreement. The graphs on the following pages indicate the findings on Enrollment/Attendance in the Cycle I schools in Pulaski County. 4  B .  ENROLLMENT/ATTENDANCE DATA (continued) NOTE: The following Cycle I schools did not report non promotes during the 1995-96 school year, thus no graphs appear for these school sites and grade levels: Little Rock School District School Grade  Baseline Elementary 3, 5, and 6  David O'Dodd Elementary 2, 3, 4, and 6  Fair Park Elementary 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6  Forest Park Elementary 4, 5, and 6  Jefferson Elementary 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6  Pulaski Heights Elementar 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6  Terry Elementary 4, 5, and 6  Wilson Elementary 1, 2, 3, 4 5 and 6 North Little Rock School District  Belwood Elementary ?-, .\"I , 4 5 and 6  Boone Park Elementary 1 3 4 and 6  Glenview Elementary 1, 2 3 5 and 6  North Heights Elementary 1, 2, 3, 4 5, and 6  Park Hill Elementary 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6  Pike View Elementary 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6  Redwood Elementary 3, 4, 5 and 6 Pulaski County Special School District  Oak Grove High 10 and 11 5 ENROLLMENT/ ATTENDANCE LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CYCLE ONE SCHOOLS SOURCE: LRSD 6 Cl) rzw 0 ::::\u0026gt; IC/) LL 0 a: w co ~ :::) z - - BASELINE ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 50 ,------------------------. 40 38 .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... . 30 20 10 0 WF WM BF BM Grade 1 - -- 2 4 18 14 .............  8 ........................ . . - _Jransported_ 1 7 Non-Transp __ 2 4 17 7 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 7 E:JWF mrnwM ~BF BM Cl) rzw 0 ::::) IC/) LL 0 a: w a) ~ :J z BASELINE ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 50 r--------------------- 44 30  ........................................................................... ............................. 20 .........................   ~OF -OM lillfilWF fflfflWM ~BF 10   -- --   ..   ......- BM 0 OF OM WF WM BF BM Grade 2 1 1 5 1 16 20 4 Trans orted 2 2 Non-Trans 1 1 5 1 14 18 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 8 en rzw 0 ::) r( J) LL 0 a: w co ~ ::) z - BASELINE ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 30 r----------------------, 25 20 .. ~-..,,...._._.............,.__._.,,....,..,.,.c  r::,WF  t2J 15 ..   10 ... . ..... -BM 5 .... ..................................4 ............................... .. 0 Grade 3 Trans orted Non-Trans WF 3 3 WM 1 1 BF 7 1 6 BM 14 2 12 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 9 .e.n.. . z w 0 ::J ..... en LL  BASELINE ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 50 ,---------------------- 40 ................3..8... .......................................... .....................................................................li.l.l.!.J.W....F.. .......................................................................................................................... fifflWM 30 ..  --- ~ 20 .. ...................................................................................................... . w co ~ ::J z 10 ..... 0 WF WM BF BM 7  Grade 4 Trans orted Non-Trans 2 2 4 1 3 15 3 12 17 3 14 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 10 - - BASELINE ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 25 .-------------------. 21 15 .  ....................t.I.I.iJ..W....F.. .........rzl18F 10 . . -BM 0 WF BF BM Grade 5 Trans orted Non-Trans 1 1 12 4 8 8 3 5 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 11  BASELINE ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 35 ___ 3_2 ______________ _ ~ 30 ..... z w 0 ::::) ..... Cl) u_ 0 a: w co ~ :::, z 25  .......................................................................................... .......................................................................................... 20  16 5  0 Grade 6 Trans orted Non-Trans OF 1 1 WF 3 1 2 WM 2 2 BF 18 11 7 BM 8 4 4 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 12 ~OF EillWF mmWM ~BF -BM  DAVID O'DODD ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT (f) 1- z w 0 :::\u0026gt; 1--( f) LL 0 a: w en ~ :::\u0026gt; z 50 ,--------------------- 40 ....................3..8.. ................................ ............................................................................................... ................................................................................................................... 30 ..... 20  10 0 WF WM BF BM .. ...................... :27... .................................................................. .............................................. Grade 1 Transpo_rted Non-Trans 5 5 8 5 3 14 10 4 11 7 4 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 13 DWF W!IWM   DAVID O'DODD ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 30 --------------------------, ~ 25  .. 23 .................................................................................................................................................................................. . z w 0 :J ~ Cl) LJ_ 0 a: w co ~ :::) z 20 I------ .. ---- ............................................ . EEIJWF 15 wmWM 15  ========== ..  ~ rz118F 10 . .. ...................8... ..........................................B....M...... ... ............... 5 .... 0 Grade 2 Transported Non-Trans WF 2 1 1 WM 2 2 BF 10 6 4 BM 9 8 1 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 14 z~ w 0 :::) ten LL 0 a: w co ~ :) z - - -  DAVID O'DODD ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 35 ------------------------. ~!!!'!!!!'!'!!!'!!!'!'!!'!'!!'!'!!!!'~ 30 ....../ :.: ..:: ::.: -:-::: :-. :::.  :::~ :~~.:.: ::.: .: :::::::. :.. ::.~: :,:. ::::~ :: .:-~:\n~:.~~:\n:\n::.:.:: ..:::.:::.:: ....................................................................... ....................................................................................................................... 25 .. ., .  ---~-O-F------_ OM 20 15 10 ...... 5 .... 0 OF OM WF WM BF BM Grade 3 1 1 8 2 5 15 Trans orted 6 2 1 13 \\.t'.\n:I.:.~..l~...1..~..~.. ........................................ ................................................ Non-Trans 1 1 2 4 2 GRADE,T RANSPORTEDA ND NON-TRANSPORTED 15 lTIWF WWWM ~BF -BM  DAVID O'DODD ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 50 ,-------------------- 43 ~z 40 LU ~OF LlElWF wmWM rzi1BF 0 :::, rC/) LL 0 a: LU Cl) ~ :::, z 30 ..... 20 .. 10 ..... 0 OF WF WM BF BM -12 BM Grade 4 Trans orted Non-Trans 1 1 7 7 7 3 4 13 9 4 15 11 4 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 16 (J) 1- z w 0 ::J 1- (J) u.. 0 a: w co ~ ::) z -  DAVID O'DODD ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 30 r-------------------- 25 20 .. 19..  ~OF  15 10  .. \"\" 5 0 OF WF WM BF BM Grade 5 1 7 1 7 9 Trans orted 4 1 7 7 Non-Trans 1 3 2 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 17 E:JWF IBIWM rzBBF BM Cl) ~ z LU 0 :.), ._ Cl) LL 0 a: LU en ~ :) z  DAVID O'DODD ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 40 ,---------------------, 35 3.4 ...............................................  ....  30 .... . 25 .. . 20 15 10 5 0 WF WM BF BM .... Grade 6 1 9 11 13 28 Trans orted 1 7 9 11 ......................................................................................................... .............................................................................................. - 6 Non-Trans 2 2 2 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 18 L2JWF mmWM rzi1B F BM en J- z UJ 0 ::::, J- en LL 0 a: w co ~ ::) z FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 40 35 33..................................................... ........ . ..  30 25 . -- 20 . --  15 ~OF BOM BWF wmwM rzilBF 10 ----- BM 5 0 Grade 1 Transported Non-Trans -+--------+-----' -----+----------- OF 1 1 OM 1 1 WF 3 3 WM 2 2 BF 10 5 5 BM 16 13 3 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 19 FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 50 ,-------------------~ 20 10 0 Grade 2 Trans orted Non-Trans WF 2 2 WM 2 2 BF 12 6 6 BM 22 16 6 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 20 EEJWF mmWM ~BF BM FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 30 r-------------------~ ~ 25 ...................2..4.. ................. ............................................................................................. ........................................................................................................... z w 0 :::\u0026gt; J-Cf) LL 0 a: w co ~ ::) z 20 ..... 5 .. 0 WF WM BF BM Grade 3 Trans orted Non-Trans 2 2 5 1 4 8 4 4 9 8 1 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 21 DWF FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 30 .-----------------------. 26 5 .... . .. 3 0 Grade 4 Trans orted Non-Trans WF 1 1 WM 3 3 BF 10 9 1 BM 12 11 1 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 22 - - - ~ z w 0 ::::, tC/) LL 0 a: w en ~ ::::) z FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 35 r---------3--2- ---------- 30 ...... 25 .. .. .............................................. 20 .. 15 10 ... 5 ... 0 WF WM BF BM Grade 5 1 1 15 15 Trans orted 9 14  :9 Non-Trans 1 1 5 2 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 23 -- filITIWF fflfflWM ~BF BM Cf) tz w 0 ::) IC/) LL 0 a: w co ~ :) z FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 30 r----------------------, 27 25 20 15  10  5 0 Grade 6 Trans orted Non-Trans WF 3 2 1 WM 2 1 1 BF 8 7 2 BM 14 11 2 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 24 DWF WilWM 1Z1B1F BM  FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT ~ z w 0 ::) r(/) LL 0 er: w ca ~ ::) z 80 .------=7...-=--3--------------- 60 ..... ~OF 41 40 ..... ~~.:::.::::::.::::::::::\n:::::z::z::::z:::.:::: ..................................................................................... ............. 20 0 Grade 1 _ _Ira_nsport~~ Non-Trans OF 1 1 WF 17 7 10 WM 21 4 17 BF 19 15 4 BM 15 14 1 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 25 Ll21WF mmWM 03BF BM ~ z w 0 :.:,:_:\u0026gt; Cl) LL 0 a: w co ~ ::::\u0026gt; z FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 100 ,--------------------------, 80 74 40 ..... .. .................3..8.. ............................................. .........3..6.. ................. ........................ 20 .. 0 Grade 2 Trans orted Non-Trans WF 21 6 15 WM 17 3 14 BF 17 14 3 BM 19 15 4 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 26 EilifilWF wmWM rz1l8F -BM U) ..... z w 0 :::) ..... U) LL 0 a: w co ~ :::) z  FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 OF WF WM BF BM 67   :. ... :.:. .:. .- :. ............... . .- -------, ~OF 111111----- lEillWF ..................................................w...m...W....M... ................................. ....... 26~ BF Grade 3 Transported Non-Trans ---- ---+------ ------~-----1 1 18 17 18 13 5 8 17 11 1 13 9 1 2 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 27 -BM  FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 60 r----------------------, 10 0 OF WF WM BF BM 53 Grade 4 1 16 14 10 12 Transported 9 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . Non-Trans 1 16 14 1 2 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 28 rnOF GiillWF mmWM ~BF -BM - - - -FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY: LRSD ~z w 0 .::.:.\u0026gt;.. (j) LL 0 a: w co ~ :::\u0026gt; z TOTAL ENROLLMENT 60 r--------------------- 54 50 40 ..... 37 30 20  ........................................ ................................................. 10 0 OM WF WM BF BM Grade 5 Transported Non-Trans 1 1 10 1 9 11 6 5 16 13 3 16 16 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 29 mOM rL::::l:J1 wF FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 80 r------------------~ 70 \"68 --\".................-..-.-.-...... ............................ 40 . .. ....................................................3......2....- .-..-.-........ ..W...f.f.l.W...M.. ..... .......... rzilBF 30  ........... .... . BM 20  .................. .. 10 ..... 0 Grade 6 Trans orted Non-Trans WF 19 2 17 WM 14 4 10 BF 20 17 3 BM 15 13 2 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 30 ~ z w 0 :) JC/) LL 0 cc LU co ~ :) z J. A. FAIR HIGH SCHOOL: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 400 .-----------------------. 350 323 300  272 -OM 250  [E!]WF 200  .......................................W...W....W...M... .......................................... 150 . m-BF 100  50 ..... 0 OM WF WM BF BM Grade 10 3 32 21 128 139 Trans orted 3 7 6 120 136 \" ---- Non-Trans 25 15 8 3 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 31 en t- z w 0 :::\u0026gt; t- en LL 0 a: w co ~ ::::) z J. A. FAIR HIGH SCHOOL: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 300 250 200 .. al:WrE3:fEmH1:emmB~.e..w...m...m...m...a.. ................................. ............................................................ 150 -- ................................................................................................................ ................................................................ 100 .................................................................................................................................................................................... 62 50 0 Grade 11 Transported Non-Trans OF 1 1 OM 3 1 2 WF 30 7 23 WM 23 8 15 BF 112 100 12 BM 105 95 10 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 32 ~OF ROM rITIJWF ifflWM ~BF BM - - - ~z UJ 0 :.:.:.::.\u0026gt;. Cl) LL 0 a: UJ en ~ :::\u0026gt; z J. A. FAIR HIGH SCHOOL: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 250 ------------------------. 210 150 ..... 100  ----- 1111111 111 50 0 Grade 12 Trans orted Non-Trans OF 2 1 1 WF 28 8 20 WM 30 10 20 BF 76 46 30 BM 74 52 22 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 33 ~OF EEJWF wmWM ~BF -BM C.l_) z w 0 :.:J_ Cl) LL 0 a: w co ~ :J z JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 100 ------------------- 80 75-- ~OF 40 0 OF OM WF WM BF BM Grade_ 1_ ___ Tr_a_nsp_o__r_te_ d N_o_n-_T_ra_ns~- 1 1 17 28 14 14 1 14 13 1 1 17 27 1 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 34 IIIOM WJJWF ~z w 0 .::)_ Cl) LL 0 a: w ca ~ ::) z - - - JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 70 ---------------------. 60 57 ......  ..........................................................................  ,-----, 40 .... . 30 .... . 20 10 ..... 0 OF OM WF WM BF BM Grade 2 1 1 13 17 11 14   33 ~WF Trans orted 11 13 :.ar. .................... ~_,. .............. .,.., ..... .. ....,... ....... . ............. . Non-Trans 1 1 13 17 1 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 35 (f) rz w 0 ::J r( f) LL 0 a: w en ~ ::J z  JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 100 --------------------~ 80 .....................7..5.. ...............................................................~..O...F.. ................40 ..... 20 0 OF OM WF WM BF BM Grade 3 1 1 23 16 15 19 -OM EEilWF ..3. 6 .......... ................................~...~............................l.W....I. WM Trans orted 1 1 15 19 . ........ . ... . Non-Trans 1 1 22 15 ----- GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 36 ~ z UJ 0 :.:.:.\u0026gt;.. Cl) LL 0 a: w co ~ :::\u0026gt; z JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 100 .------------------- 80 77 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. . 47 40 ........................................... .... .......................... 20 ..... ... 0 OM WF WM BF BM Grade 4 Trans orted Non-Trans ---+-- __ _...___ - ------------------1 1 25 21 13 17 1 13 16 25 21 1 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 37 IIOM lillTIWF mfflWM rzilBF BM ~z w 0 :.:)_ Cl) LL 0 a: w co ~ ::) z - JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 100 r-----------------------, 80 :7460 ... @E]WF wmWM 40 ..... 39 rz.j8F 35: 0 WF WM BF BM Grade 5 16 23 19 16 Trans orted 19 16 Non-Trans 16 23 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 38 - - - JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 80 r--------------------~ ~ 70  m 60 ..... 0 :::, 50 ~ (./) LL 40 0 aw: 30 ~ 20 :::) z 10 0 OM WF WM BF BM 70 Grade 6 2 19 29 10 10 -- 50 ROM .......................................................................... ... .D...W...F.. .................... .............................................................................. m...W....M... ............... ........................................................................ .... ~...B..F.. ...................... 20 -BM Trans orted 10 10 Non-Trans 2 19 29 GRADE,T RANSPORTEDA ND NON-TRANSPORTED 39 - - - PARKVIEW MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL: LRSD w J- z w 0 :::) JCJ) LL 0 a: w en ::E :::) z TOTAL ENROLLMENT 350 ,-------------------50  ..... -BM 0 Grade 10 Trans orted Non-Trans OF 7 4 3 OM 4 2 2 WF 65 42 23 WM 69 31 38 BF 79 30 49 BM 82 23 59 GRADE,T RANSPORTEDA ND NON-TRANSPORTED 40 - - - PARKVIEW MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL: LRSD ~ z w 0 :::) IC/) LL 0 a: w co ~ :::) z TOTAL ENROLLMENT 350 .-----------------------, 300 304 -----jiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________,._--_---_--_, __________________________________________________________ 250  1------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 200 - 150 100 --------------------------------------D-W-F ---------150 ~~~~~------ mm WM 50 0 OF OM WF WM BF BM ~BF Grade 11 Trans orted Non-Trans 7 5 2 7 3 4 79 45 34 55 36 19 100 39 61 56 22 34 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 41 - - - PARKVIEW MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL: LRSD en Jz w Cl :) Jen LL 0 a: w co ~ :J z TOTAL ENROLLMENT 300 ,---------------------- 250 200 .... . 150 .... . 100 50 0 OF OM WF WM BF BM 247 Grade 12 13 9 53 48 67 57 ~OF ROM 133[E[]W f  114 ~~~ ~ mmWM Trans orted 10 6 33 26 21 18 Non-Trans 3 3 20 22 46 39 ~BF -BM GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 42 - - - PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 80 ,------------------~ 72 0 WF WM BF BM Grade 1 14 19 23 16 Transported 11 8 Non-Trans 14 19 12 8 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 43 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 80 -----------------~ ~z LU 0 :::) ~ Cl) 60  LL 40 0 a: LU ca ~ :::) z 20 0 WF WM BF BM 71 50 Grade 2 Trans orted Non-Trans 12 12 18 1 17 23 11 12 18 9 9 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 44 IEEWF ffifflWM ~BF -BM PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT ~ z w 0 :.:,) ._ Cl) LL 0 a: w co ~ ::) z 80 r----s,r------------------- 40 20 0 Grade 3 Trans orted Non-Trans OM 4 4 WF 20 2 18 WM 19 1 18 BF 13 8 5 BM 17 11 6 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 45 BIOM lEElWF mmWM ~BF -BM - - - PULASKI. HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY: LRSD Cf) tz w 0 ::) I-Cf) LL 0 er: w en ~ :) z TOTAL ENROLLMENT 80 r----------------------, 60 20 0 OF WF WM BF BM 71 Grade 4 1 13 16 20 21 Transported 1 10 13 47 Non-Trans 1 13 15 10 8 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 46 ~OF GZJWF mmWM ~BF -BM PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT a: w co ~ :J z 60 ___ 5_ 5_ _ _____________ __ 0 Grade 5 Trans orted Non-Trans WF 16 1 15 WM 8 8 BF 15 11 4 BM 16 10 6 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 47 BE.IWF fflfflWM ~BF BM - PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 60 ,----------------------, 53 40 ... .. ~OF EEJWF 30  .. - --- tlmlWM- ~BF ::  1i1l lli llli lll1 111-B M 0 Grade 6 Transported Non-Trans OF 2 2 WF 9 9 WM 12 1 11 BF 16 12 4 BM 14 11 3 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 48 z~ w 0 :.:.:.::.\u0026gt;. en LL 0 a: w co ~ :::, z TERRY ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 100 --------------------- 83 60 50 0 Grade 1 Transported Non-Trans - -- OF 3 3 OM 2 2 WF 26 4 22 WM 18 3 15 BF 16 10 6 BM 18 14 4 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 49 ~OF OM ITIT.JWF Cl) 1- z w 0 :::) IC/) LL 0 a: w co ~ :::) z TERRY ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 80 ,-------------------- 71 40 .... 20 0 OF OM WF WM BF BM 41 ~-~-~---------~------~-- ~::.:~:=-:  :::    Grade 2 Transported Non-Trans 2 1 1 2 2 17 6 11 18 4 14 16 9 7 16 10 6 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 50 ~OF -OM filS1WF wmWM rzaBF ..... BM TERRY ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 80 ------------------- ~ 70 z w 60 0 :J ~ CJ) 50 40 ..... 69 ___._,,_ ----~_,,~ ... .,._._,_...,. ____ __..,,._._ ..---~~.,.. :.:.. : . ..... ~-=' ..... ~. ::~. .:  ,~-:~:::~::::~=:~~-::~:-:.:~.,.:- --..~..=. -~,:: .: 39 ......~...-.-. -----------~-~----- 30 -:,. .:. . -OM EJWF wmWM LL 0 a: w co ~ :J z\n~. 11::1~1 11:: 0 OF OM WF WM BF BM Grade 3 1 2 16 23 17 10 Trans orted 4 8 11 7 Non-Trans 1 2 12 15 6 3 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 51 ~z w 0 :J JC/) LL 0 a: LU en ~ :J z TERRY ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 100 ,--.--------------------, 80 41 40 ..... 39 20 - ....... ..... 0 Grade 4 Trans orted Non-Trans OM 4 1 3 WF 10 3 7 WM 27 11 16 BF 22 12 10 BM 17 14 3 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 52 BIOM IBillWF wmWM ~BF -BM ~z LU 0 ::) J( J) LL 0 a: LU co ~ ::) z TERRY ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 80 ,------------------------ 71 40 0 OF OM WF WM BF BM ~!'!'!'!''!'!'!'!'!'!'!'!'':!'!'!'!'!'!'!'!'!'!'!' .\n:~. ~- .. . :.:: ~ .. :-.:::~- ~::,:.~ ::: :::::~: ~~--~~~~~~=:~::::~::~:::::.::~::.:::.:. : :, :.: ~ Grade 5 2 2 18 12 20 17 Transported 1 1 9 6 16 14 24 . ----. ----. ~-------- Non-Trans 1 1 9 6 4 3 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 53 ~OF -OM DWF wmWM ~BF -BM ~z w 0 ::\u0026gt; JC/) LL 0 a: w co ~ ::\u0026gt; z WILSON ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 60 ------------------- 50 IIIOM 40  36 [I[]WF IBIWM 30 .. .  r2]8F 20 .. . ---B---M  10 0 OM WF WM BF BM Grade 1 Trans orted Non-Trans 1 1 3 1 2 2 2 26 6 20 18 7 11 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 55 C.J,)_ z UJ 0 .::), _ CJ) LL 0 a: UJ co ~ ::) z TERRY ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 70 r--------------------- 62 60 .... --ar.-~..- .. ---..~---. ~~~:~:~:::::~\n::::::::.~.:.::::::~:.-:\n~:.:\n~-\n~~:~:~~~~~.-~~~~~=~~~::~~~~G:~~::::~~~~-:~:~~~~-:~~~~~:~:::::~: 40 .... . 31 30 ... ... ...................-..-.-.-.-.-...--.-..-... ... .\":.:.-.:::~..::-.::~.~: :: . .  20   10 ..... 0 Grade 6 Transported Non-Trans OF 1 1 OM 3 1 2 WF 16 4 12 WM 14 3 11 BF 13 11 2 BM 15 12 3 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 54 ~OF 111110M [[TIWF ..... wmWM r2'iB1 F C.,l) _ z w 0 :.J, _ Cl) LL 0 a: w co ~ :::) z - WILSON ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 70 ,---------------------- 60 58\"\"'\" ............................................................................................................................................................. . 50 ..... 30 20 10 0 OM WF WM BF BM Grade 2 1 4 6 29 18 Trans orted 1 15 12 Non-Trans 4 6 14 6 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 56 -OM BIT1WF wmWM rzj8F -BM (f) tz w 0 :::) t( f) LL 0 a: w en ~ z= \u0026gt; WILSON ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 70 ...-------------------- 60 ....................5..6.. .................................. ............................................................................................... .................................................................................................................. 50 ...... -- ~OF IIOM 40 .. .. ........................................................................3..5..............................[...J..W...F.. ... ................. 30 20 10 0 OF OM WF WM BF BM Grade 3 1 1 5 1 19 29 ....................................................................... ..l.f.f.l.D...W...M... .......... 21 [!i]8F Trans orted 1 1 1 1 8 9 Non-Trans 4 11 20 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 57 WILSON ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 60 r-------------------- 50 46-------- ..  ................................................................................................................. . 20 ..... 10 0 OF WF WM BF BM Grade 4 1 3 3 15 24 Trans orted 1 3 11 14 Non-Trans 3 4 10 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 58 ~OF LlillWF wmwM rzllBF BM en 1- z w 0 ::\u0026gt; I-en LL 0 a: UJ en ~ ::) z WILSON ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 50 .--------------------- 20 10 0 OF OM WF WM BF BM 41 19 Grade 5 Trans orted Non-Trans 1 1 1 1 3 1 2 5 3 2 11 5 6 20 12 8 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 59 ~OF OM IEillWF mmWM ~BF -BM z~ w 0 ::, JC/) LL 0 a: w co ~ ::, z WILSON ELEMENTARY: LRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 35 -------------------- 31 20 .. 15 .. .. ................................... ......................................................... 10 .. .. .... ... 5 ...... .. 0 Grade 6 Trans orted Non-Trans OF 2 2 WM 5 2 3 BF 14 10 4 BM 10 8 2 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 60 ~OF wmWM ~BF -BM ENROLLMENT/ ATTENDANCE NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CYCLE ONE SCHOOLS SOURCE: NLRSD 61 -  - BELWOOD ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 25 r-------------------- 15 ..... 5 ..... 0 OF WF WM BF BM Grade 1 1 1 6 4 7 14 DWF Trans orted 1 1 3 Non-Trans 1 1 5 3 4 mmWM  ~BF -BM GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 62 - - - BELWOOD ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 30 ------------------ en 26 ~ 25 --------w I --  20 ..... .  . 18 OM ~ [E)WF en LL 0 a: w en ~ ::) z 15   lmWM  [:2']8F 10 8     BM 5 ..... 0 OM WF WM BF BM Grade 2 1 3 6 7 9 Trans orted 1 3 4 Non-Trans 1 2 6 4 5 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 63 - - - BELWOOD ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 20 .------------------~ 18 ~ lffl!~mggg~mmffll LL 0 a: w co ~ ::::\u0026gt; z DWF 10 . .. ........................................9. ...................................... .............................. 9................................ fflfflWM ~BF -BM 5 . .. 0 Grade 3 Trans orted Non-Trans WF 1 1 WM 6 2 4 BF 6 4 2 BM 5 2 3 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 64 - - - a: lJ.J en :E :::\u0026gt; z BELWOOD ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 30 ----------------- 27 5 ..... 0 Grade 4 Trans orted Non-Trans WF 9 9 WM 3 1 2 BF 6 2 4 BM 9 8 1 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 65 G\u0026amp;JWF mmWM rzaBF -BM - - - BELWOOD ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 25 ------------------- Cl) ~ 2 0 ...1..9..  j. ..................................................................................................................................... ... w 0 :) ..... Cl) LL 0 a: w co ~ :::, z 10 ..... 5 0 WF WM BF BM 5 Grade 5 Trans orted Non-Trans 5 5 7 2 5 3 1 2 4 2 2 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 66 - - - Cl) rzw 0 ::) rCI) LL 0 a: UJ en ~ ::) z BELWOOD ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 35 -------------------- 30 30 ..... ~OF i!!!!!!!!!!!!'!!!!!!!!!!!!~ ::r::: x.::: : :: . : :::-::.=::~~:::::: :::~-::.~~~~~~=::: ::~::: ::=::~::~::.::-:::::\n:::::::::~:~~:: :~:=~~=- 25 . .. .......................'.:... .....................................................................................2..2..........  IIIIOM 20 ----.................................................................r.r.r..n..w..F.. .................................................................... W\n:\n:\n:J 15 10   .. ..... ....  .............. .......... 5 0 OF OM WF WM BF BM Grade 6 1 1 9 7 7 5 Trans orted 1 5 2 Non-Trans 1 1 9 6 2 3 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 67 - - - BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY: NLRSD Cl) ~ z w 0 ::) ~ Cl) LL 0 a: w co ~ ::) z TOTAL ENROLLMENT 100 r----------------------. 84 81 IIIOM 80 -1 60 - ................................... . . liillWF fflfflWM 40 . ................................................................. ...~..B..F... .............. 20 ..... 0 OM WF WM BF BM Grade 1 3 7 10 30 34 3 Trans orted 1 2 Non-Trans 3 6 10 30 32 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 68 - - - BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY: NLRSD fE z w 0 ::J r( J) LL 0 a: w ca ~ ::J z TOTAL ENROLLMENT 100 ,------------------- 80 ...............7..5.. ................... ,.. ............................................................. ............................. ............................................................................................... ::--. :-: . 70 60  ...................................... ........................................................ 40 ................. . ................. 20 .... 0 WF WM BF BM Grade 2 5 9 26 35 5 Trans orted 1 1 3 Non-Trans 5 8 25 32 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 69 DWF mmWM CZ18F BM - - - BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 80 ,-----------------------, ~ 69 z w 60 ..... 0 ..... 111110M :.:,:_\u0026gt; Cl) LL 0 a: w co ~ :::\u0026gt; z DWF 40   ~WM  20 ..... 0 OM WF WM BF BM Grade 3 1 6 8 25 33 4 Trans orted 1 3 Non-Trans 1 6 8 24 30 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 70 ~BF ..... -BM - - - BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 80 ------------------- 71 ~ z LU 60  0 :::\u0026gt; J-U) 64 -~OF DWF LL 0 40   mWM  a: LU cc ~ :::\u0026gt; z 20  0 OF WF WM BF BM 7 Grade 4 Trans orted Non-Trans 1 1 3 1 2 10 1 9 22 2 20 35 3 32 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 71 ~BF ..... -BM - - - BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY: NLRSD Cl) 1- z w 0 :::, IC/) LL 0 a: w (0 ~ :::, z TOTAL ENROLLMENT 100 ,---------------------. 80 .................7..8.. ......................................................................7..5.. .....................................-..-................................... .......................................................................... 60 . -.....f ==iWF mfflWM 40 . .. .................................... ...... . . ~BF 20 ..... 0 OM WF WM BF BM Grade 6 1 9 9 29 30 3 Trans orted 3 Non-Trans 1 9 9 29 27 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 73 - - - BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 70 ----------------- 62 50 . 111111111 :~l!i!Iil!~!!!!l~~II!lllll~l!ilillllIElil!ll!lil!l!l~j~ij!ll!l!Itlti  40   30   20  10 ..... 0 WF WM BF BM Grade 5 7 5 25 25 6 Trans orted 3 3 Non-Trans 7 5 22 22 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 72 DWF W!IWM rnBF -BM - - - GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 30 r------------------------.. 20 .....  mEWF 15  .. fflfflWM ~BF 10 . ........................................................................ ..-.B..M... ........................ 5  0 WF WM BF BM Grade 1 2 4 11 8 0 Trans orted 0 Non-Trans 2 4 11 8 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 74 - - - GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 30 ,------------------ ~r- 25  .................,...2... 5., ....~~..,..,..-,.24... ................ ...................... z LU 0 :.:,:). _ Cf) LL 0 a: w en ~ :::) z 20 ------ lETIWF 15 .   . mmWM ~BF 10 . .. .. .  BM 5 - 0 WF WM BF BM Grade 2 4 2 9 10 1 Trans orted 1 Non-Trans 4 2 9 9 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 75 - - - GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 30 ,---------------------. 20 . ..................................................................... ...E..2..2..].W....F.. .......... 15 ................................ .......................... ............... . l!!IWM ~BF 10  5 .... 0 WF WM BF BM Grade 3 2 1 9 12 0 Trans orted 0 Non-Trans 2 1 9 12 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 76 ..... BM - - - GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 35 .------------------- - t DWF 25  11. 20 ..... ..... lfmJWM  5 ..... 0 WF WM BF BM Grade 4 7 4 10 7 ........... . ....... .. . . .... .. .  1 Trans orted 1 Non-Trans 7 4 10 6 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 77 -   GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 30 r------------------ 0 WM BF BM Grade 5 4 13 6 ----- 2 Trans orted 1 1 Non-Trans 3 13 5 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 78 ifflWM - - - a: w co ~ :J z GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 35 -----~-------------------. 10 .. 5 - 0 WF WM BF BM Grade 6 3 3 10 16 Trans orted 2 5 Non-Trans 3 1 10 11 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 79 - - - NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY: NLRSD 30 ... 20 10 ..... 0 OF OM WF WM BF BM TOTAL ENROLLMENT Grade 1 2 1 18 16 11 16 Trans orted 2 1 6 2 Non-Trans 1 18 15 5 14 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 80 ..... mmWM - - - NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY: NLRSD Cl) 1- z w 0 :J IC/) LL 0 a: w co ~ ::) z TOTAL ENROLLMENT 100 -------------------, 80 ...................7..5.. ............................................................~..O...F.. ....................................................................................................................... 40 ..... 20 0 OF OM WF WM BF BM Grade 2 4 3 13 25 15 15 Trans orted 2 2 1 4 66 Non-Trans 2 1 13 25 14 11 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 81 BOM - - - NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY: NLRSD OF OM WF WM BF BM TOTAL ENROLLMENT Grade 3 4 2 17 18 18 7 Trans orted 2 1 1 5 1 Non-Trans 2 1 16 18 13 6 GRADE,T RANSPORTEDA ND NON-TRANSPORTED 82 - - - NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY: NLRSD Cl) Jz w 0 ::::) JC/) LL 0 cc w co ~ ::::) z TOTAL ENROLLMENT 80 ,-------------------- 70 65 -- 60 ..... --\"'O,58  ~OF !'!'!'!''!''!''!''!'6'!'6'!''!'::.xrA3::'!C: .~ .. :: .. .\n..:::,:- . ..: ::-:,-.-:::::.,:::::,.~ .. ::::,::~:-:.~:::-::::::::::-\n~. :::::::::::::::::::-:,, .. ::~:t \\:::::-:::::~:: .. :-:\n: 50  --  40 30  20 10 ..... 0 OF OM WF WM BF BM Grade 4 2 3 20 14 11 15 -- ~..   1  Trans orted 1 4 2 Non-Trans 1 3 20 14 7 13 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 83 OM wwWF lm!IWM ~BF -BM - - - NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY: NLRSD ~z w 0 ::\u0026gt; r(/) LL 0 TOTAL ENROLLMENT 60 ------------------, 0 OF OM WF WM BF BM Grade 5 3 3 10 15 12 8 Trans orted 1 2 Non-Trans 3 2 10 15 10 8 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 84 - - - NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT Cl) 80 rz- 67 w 0 ::) rCI) 60 -----,. ~~~~~~~~~ LL 0 40  OF OM WF WM BF BM Grade 6 4 1 18 23 13 14 Trans orted 1 3 2 Non-Trans 3 1 18 23 10 12 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 85 ~OF BOM rnillWF fflfflWM - - - PARK HILL ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 60 ,-------------------, 10 ..... 0 WF WM BF BM Grade 1 18 6 10 15 Trans orted 7 9 Non-Trans 18 6 3 6 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 86 - - - PARK HILL ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 50 r-----------------~ 0 OM WF WM BF BM 44 Grade 2 1 7 12 13 11 Trans orted 8 6 Non-Trans 1 7 12 5 5 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 87 - - - PARK HILL ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 50 ------------------- 0 WF WM BF BM 41 Grade 3 9 10 16 6 ---- I Trans orted 6 3 Non-Trans 9 10 10 3 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 88 llifilWF wmWM ~BF -BM - - - PARK HILL ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 40 r------------------ 36 (f) I- ~ 30 ..... 0 ::J 1-- (f) LL 20  0 a: w ~ 10 ::::, z 0 WF WM BF BM I --- 25 Grade 4 Trans orted Non-Trans 6 6 13 13 8 4 4 9 7 2 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 89 LlWF fflfflWM rzJBF -BM - - - PARK HILL ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 60 .------------------- ~ 50 48 ....  z w 0 ::J IC/) LL 0 a: w en ~ ::J z 30 ..... ---- ........................ . ... . rz1B1 F WWWM 20 - ------------------------------ -----------_.:- \\-:?-'-- -----B-M 10 ..  0 Grade 5 Trans orted Non-Trans WF 14 14 WM 14 14 BF 7 6 1 BM 13 9 4 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 90 - - - PARK HILL ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 30 ,-----------------, 0 Grade 6 Trans orted Non-Trans WF 9 9 WM 4 4 BF 6 3 3 BM 4 4 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 91 r:::77WF ~ mmwM ~BF -BM - - - PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 80 ..--------------------. 20 .. 10 ..... 0 WF WM BF BM Grade 1 9 15 20 23 Trans orted 3 12 14 Non-Trans 9 12 8 9 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 92 - - - PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 70 ---------------------, ~ 60 ?~ ..................................................................................................................................................................................... .... z 0w 50. , --:::) lETWI F ~ 40 . ... . ... ............................. ....... ........ ......3....8. .......... .. ... ......... .. .. . llmWl M LL I ::  .... ..... .....1...1...1 1 1_ ::__~ _ :) z 10  0 WF WM BF BM Grade 2 Trans orted Non-Trans 10 10 15 1 14 15 9 6 19 11 8 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 93 - - - PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT Cf) 35 31 z.._ 30  \"\"w 0 :.:.:,_ Cl) LL 0 a: w en ~ :::) z 25 ..... 20 .... 10 5 . 0 WF WM BF BM Grade 3 5 7 9 10 Trans orted 4 6 Non-Trans 5 7 5 4 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 94 BfilWF fflfflWM ~BF BM - - - PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 60 .-----------------~ 30 ..  20     10 0 OM WF WM BF BM Grade 4 1 16 11 7 14 Trans orted 1 1 6 8 Non-Trans 16 10 1 6 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 95 - - - PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 70 ,------------------.. 62 ~ SO 71711!71!l1l\n1li!t7-v1~1 1!7 ................................................................................... ............................................................................................... ~ 50 ..... ::, lliillWF ~ 40 ..... m mwM  LL ~ 30 . g  ~ w ca 20   ~ ----- ~ 10   0 WF WM BF BM Grade 5 13 14 22 13 Trans orted 14 8 Non-Trans 13 14 8 5 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 96 ~BF - - - PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 60 ----------------------- 10 ... 0 OM WF WM BF BM Grade 6 1 6 14 10 16 Trans orted 1 4 9 Non-Trans 1 6 13 6 7 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 97 - - - REDWOOD ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLME T 35 ----------------- BF BM Grade 1 15 14 Trans orted 0 Non-Trans 15 14 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 98 - - - REDWOOD ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 50 ------------------~ ~ 40 3.9. z :-: . I 36 w 0 ::) ~ Cl) 30 . . EIJWF  LL 0 a: 20  w co ~ ::) z 10 ..... 0 WF BF BM Grade 2 2 16 21 ~BF .............. ........................................ . BM Trans orted 1 2 Non-Trans 2 15 19 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 99 - - - REDWOOD ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 30 ----------------- Cr-J) 25  ,....,......2..5.. .....,.,.--.-.-.~..~..-..-.-.......... z ----- I w 22  20       filITIWF .... ~ 15 . .................................................................. ..l.l.l.f.f.lW... M 0 ~BF aw: 10 .. .-.- .. ------- - --- - -BM  co ~ :J .......................3.. ..... ...   z 5 ..... 0 WF WM BF BM Grade 3 1 1 12 11 ................................................ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Trans orted 1 2 Non-Trans 1 12 9 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 100 - - - REDWOOD ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 30 ...--------------------, 10 .... 5 .... . 0 WM BF BM 26 Grade 4 1 10 15 - 2 Trans orted 1 1 Non-Trans 10 14 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 101 - - - REDWOOD ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 30 ,------------------- WF BF BM Grade 5 1 14 8 Trans orted 0 Non-Trans 1 14 8 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 102 - - - REDWOOD ELEMENTARY: NLRSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 30 ----------------- 5 ... 0 WF WM BF BM Grade 6 1 1 12 10 Trans orted 1 1 Non-Trans 1 11 10 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 103 ENROLLMENT/ ATTENDANCE PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT CYCLE ONE SCHOOLS SOURCE: PCSSD 104 JACKSONVILLE HIGH SCHOOL: PCSSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT ~z w 0 :::, rcn LL 0 a: w co :?E :::, z 400 ~------------------- 300 200 100 0 OF OM WF WM BF BM 353 Grade 10 2 5 114 131 48 53 247 Transported 1 2 77 95 33 39 108 Non-Trans 1 3 37 38 15 14 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 105 ~OF IBOM ITiillWF wmwM rziaB F BM - - - JACKSONVILLE HIGH SCHOOL: PCSSD (f) rz w 0 :J r( f) LL 0 a: w co ~ :J z TOTAL ENROLLMENT 400 ---------------------- 350 ....3..3 .1. ... ....................................................................................................... .............................................................................................................. 300 ..... ----~OF 200 150 ..... 100 50 0 OF WF WM BF BM Grade 11 Trans orted Non-Trans 3 1 2 95 62 33 106 65 41 62 51 11 65 48 17 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 106 mfflWM r2]8F BM - - - JACKSONVILLE HIGH SCHOOL: PCSSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 350 (f) rz- 300 281- - w 0 250 :::\u0026gt; r- (f) 200 200 II2JWF LL 0 150 ........ .......................................l.i...li.l.W...M... ............................................ a: w 100 ca mBF 81 ~ :::\u0026gt; 50 z 0 Grade 12 Trans orted Non-Trans OF 2 1 1 OM 5 2 3 WF 75 56 19 WM 101 68 33 BF 49 36 13 BM 49 37 12 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 107 Cl) r z w 0 :::) r Cl) LL 0 a: w (l') ~ :::, z NORTH PULASKI HIGH: PCSSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 350 .----------------------- 310 300 ..... 250  .  224 ~OF IIIOM 150 .........................................l.!.!.I.W...M... ................................................ ~BF 100 ..... 86 50 0 Grade 10 Trans orted Non-Trans OF 3 2 1 OM 2 2 WF 113 87 26 WM 104 76 28 BF 39 25 14 BM 49 32 17 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 108 ~ z w 0 ::) JC/) LL 0 a: w co ~ ::) z NORTH PULASKI HIGH: PCSSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 300 -------------------- 250 242 ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................-.-...............  OF 200 m fflfff3fflfflm00fflffifflfflmmfflifflfflij184=~ 150 wmWM 100 ..... 50 0 OF OM WF WM BF BM Grade 11 Transpo_rted Non-Trans 3 2 1 1 1 75 55 20 98 74 24 24 16 8 41 36 5 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 109 t?iJBF BM Cl) Jz w 0 ::) JC/) LL 0 a: w co ~ ::) z  NORTH PULASKI HIGH: PCSSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 250 ,----------2--2-6-- -------- 200 150 100 50 0 OF OM WF WM BF BM Grade 12 2 1 92 76 27 28 156 Trans orted 2 1 62 57 16 18 70 Non-Trans 30 19 11 10 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 110  ~OF IIIOM EJJWF wmwM rzj8F -BM  OAK GROVE HIGH SCHOOL: PCSSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT ~ 200 ---------------------~ 179 z ~ 150 ..... ::) I-C/) LL 100  0 a: w ~ 50 ..... ::) z 0 OM WF WM BF BM Grade 7 2 58 74 22 23 .. ..  .1....3..5...................... ....m.... O...M... ............................................ Trans orted 2 52 62 12 7 GEJWF filWWM ~BF .................4..4.. ..................-.B...M... .............. Non-Trans 6 12 10 16 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 111  OAK GROVE HIGH SCHOOL: PCSSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT ~ z UJ 0 .::.::_:, Cl) LL 0 a: w co ~ :::::, z 180 ------------------ 160 .................................... 1. .5. .5................................................................................................................................................................................................................ -- 140 ..... 134 ~ ~~ w:: lll.lttwmrn ::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::60 ..... .. .................................... ...................................................... 40 ..... 21-- ~OF IIOM DWF mmWM ~BF 20  ........... --BM 0 OF OM WF WM BF BM Grade 8 1 1 57 63 16 17 Trans orted 1 1 52 57 13 10 Non-Trans 5 6 3 7 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 112  OAK GROVE, HIGH SCHOOL: PCSSD .,. ~z w 0 :.:). _ CJ) u_ 0 a: w co :\nE ::) z TOTAL ENROLLMENT 200 ,---------------------, 168 50 ... . 30  0 Grade 9 Trans orted Non-Trans OM 1 1 WF 60 52 8 WM 63 61 2 BF 23 13 10 BM 21 11 10 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 113 .. ~ z w 0 :::) ~ en LL 0 a: w en ~ :::) z - - -  OAK GROVE HIGH SCHOOL: PCSSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 160 ,--------------------- 142 140 ~~~~~120 100 80 60 .....  -- ~OF -OM lETIWF WWWM ~BF 40 ..... 33 ......................................... -BM 20 0 OF OM WF WM BF BM Grade 10 2 1 46 56 17 20 Trans orted 2 1 42 49 6 9 Non-Trans 4 7 11 11 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 114 (J) Jz w 0 ::J J--( 1) LL 0 a: w ca :?! ::J z  OAK GROVE HIGH SCHOOL: PCSSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 160 --------------------- 141 BO 11111 60 ..... .. ..................................... ........................................................ 40 .. .............................................. 26 20 ~~mmWJ~~. 0 Grade 11 TranspoDed Non-Trans OF 4 4 WF 49 45 4 WM 51 48 3 BF 23 11 12 BM 14 7 7 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 115 ~OF IEillWF WIDWM ri2BF -BM OAK GROVE HIGH SCHOOL: PCSSD : TOTAL ENROLLMENT ~ z L1.J 0 :::) t-CI) LL 0 a: L1.J co ~ :::) z 140 -------------------- 60 40 ..... 20 0 OF OM WF WM BF BM Grade 12 1 2 35 53 13 15 Trans orted 1 2 29 44 7 7 29 Non-Trans 6 9 6 8 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 116 ~BF BM ~z w 0 ::::\u0026gt; ~ (J) LL 0 a: w en ~ ::::\u0026gt; z - SYLVAN HILLS JUNIOR HIGH: PCSSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 350 ,------------------------. 300 250 200 150 100 ..... 50 0 WF WM BF BM 303 ...8..8.. ........................ ........ ........ Grade 7 Trans orted Non-Trans 106 75 31 125 79 46 40 37 3 32 24 8 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 117 BzJWF fflmWM 1Zj8f BM ~ z w 0 ::J Jen LL 0 a: w en ~ ::J z SYLVAN HILLS JUNIOR HIGH: PCSSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 350 --------------------- 300 280 ::: iii.ii! :-182 ___ . ~:~ 150 .... . 100 .... . ............ -..  ..- - . . . . . . : ::}?\\\\:?K:::::.:::/i:::\":,::'/::f\n:\n:'.}/}=f\\/\\ 98 50 0 Grade 8 Trans orted Non-Trans WF 96 59 37 WM 126 73 53 BF 24 21 3 BM 34 29 5 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 118 ~z w 0 :::) ~ Cl) LL 0 a: w a:l :E :::) z - - - SYLVAN HILLS JUNIOR HIGH: PCSSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT 350 r-------------------- 300 282- 250 200 150 100 ... .. 50 0 WF WM BF BM Grade 9 107 113 27 35 Trans orted 66 73 24 30 89---- Non-Trans 41 40 3 5 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 119 - - - SYLVAN HILLS HIGH SCHOOL: PCSSD ~ z UJ 0 .::.:.:.\u0026gt;. Cl) LL 0 a: UJ co ~ ::::\u0026gt; z TOTAL ENROLLMENT 300 .------------2--7--1- ---- 250 ..... ...................................... ............. ............................................ ~OF 200 ..... .. ............................................ 180 ..  BIOM 150 100 ... 50 0 OF OM WF WM BF BM Grade 10 1 4 89 112 34 31 Trans orted 1 4 66 72 16 21 EJWF WilWM ...................9....1.... ....................................~....B.....F.... ................ Non-Trans 23 40 18 10 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 120 - - - SYLVAN HILLS HIGH SCHOOL: PCSSD TOTAL ENROLLMENT Cl) Jz w 0 :) JC/) LL 0 er: w co ~ :) z 350 ,----------------------, 300 281... . ............................................ ..........................250 200 150 ......  ..-.. ................................... . 194 ..... . ............................................................................................................................................................................................ . ------------------------- '\"'''''::'''''\\''''\"\"'~:r'':''':''V\\\"':':r:~''~''''''\"':' ...,., ,,,,, ,., , ,. ,. .., ,,r,'''\\' -------- rnOF DOM lEEJWF lifflWM 100  ~BF .....................8..7.. ................. ........ ..............  50 0 OF OM WF WM BF BM Grade 11 4 9 96 92 38 42 Transported 3 8 71 69 19 24 Non-Trans 1 26 23 19 18 GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 121 - - - SYLVAN HILLS HIGH SCHOOL: PCSSD Cl) r z w 0 ::) r Cl) LL 0 cc w co ~ ::) z TOTAL ENROLLMENT 300 ,---~2-=7~1---------------~ 150 100  50 0 OF OM WF WM BF BM Grade 10 1 4 89 112 34 31 Trans orted 1 4 66 72 16 21 91 ~BF Non-Trans 23 40 18 10 BM GRADE, TRANSPORTED AND NON-TRANSPORTED 122 - - - BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: 30 Cl) J- z w 25 0 :J 20 J-Cl) LL 15 0 a: 10 w co ~ 5 :J z 0 BM Compensatory Ed. 2 Enrollment 14 Transported 7 LRSD Grade 1 Enrollment - 1996-97 BF 1 18 1 WM 3 4 WF OM OF 2 ~Compensatory Ed. Lill Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 123 G, - - - BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: 25 Cl) t-z w 20 0 :) t- 15 Cl) LL 0 10 a: w co ~ 5 . :) z 0 BM Enrollment 20 Transported 2 LRSD Grade 2 Enrollment - 1996-97 BF WM WF OM OF 16 1 5 1 1 2 BTEI nrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. Note: There were no students receiving Compensatory Education at this grade level. 124 - - - BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: 25 Cf) ~ z w 20 0 ::) ~ 15 Cf) LL 0 10 a: w co ~ 5 ::) z 0 - Compensatory Ed. Enrollment Transported LRSD Grade 3 Enrollment - 1996-97 BM BF WM 6 3 1 14 7 1 2 1 1 WF 1 3 OM OF ~Compensatory Ed. EEEJ nrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 125 - - - BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: 30 Cf) 1- wz 25 0 ::) 20 I-Cf) LL 15 0 wa: 10 co ~ 5 . ::) z 0 Compensatory Ed. Enrollment Transported LRSD Grade 4 Enrollment - 1996-97 BM BF 6 4 17 15 3 3 WM 1 4 1 WF OM 2 OF ~Compensatory Ed. D Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 126 - - - BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: 20 Cl) rz-w 15 0 :::\u0026gt; r- CI) LL 10 0 a: UJ co 5 ::E ::) z LRSD Grade 5 Enrollment - 1996-97 -... .-.. . .. 16 1 0 l\"-----.-------~--r-------,---~ BM Enrollment 8 Transported 3 BF WM WF OM 12 4 1 OF  Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. Note: There were no students receiving Compensatory Education at this grade level. 127 - - - BASELINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: 35 Cl) rz- 30 w 0 25 ::) r- 20 Cl) LL 0 15 a: w 10 co ~ ::) 5 z 0 BM Enrollment 8 Transported 4 LRSD Grade 6 Enrollment - 1996-97 29 BF WM WF OM 18 11 2 3 1 OF 1 EillEl nrollment -Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. Note: There were no students receiving Compensatory Education at this grade level. 128 - - - DAVID O' DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 1 Enrollment - 1996-97 30 Cl) tzw 25 0 :::\u0026gt; 20 I-Cl) LL 15 0 ffi 10 ca ~ 5 :::\u0026gt; z 0 !'----.------.---------,---,-----,------( BM BF WM WF OM OF Fpensatory Ed. 4 j Enrollment 11 Transported 7 2 14 10 4 8 5 2 5 5 Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 129 ~Compensatory Ed. E2l Enrollment Transported - - - DAVID O' DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 2 Enrollment - 1996-97 20 Cl) - - - - I-z w 0 15 ~Compensatory Ed. ::J I-  Enrollment Cl) LL 10  Transported 0 --- ---  a: w co 5 . ~ ::J z 0 BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 1 1 1 2 Enrollment 9 10 2 2 Transported 8 6 1 INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 130 - - - DAVID O' DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 3 Enrollment - 1996-97 20 ~z ~ 15  l/V'/VVVv :) ~ (./) LL 10 0 a: w en 5 ~ :) z BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 3 1 Enrollment 8 3 Transported 5 1 1 1 1 2 5 3 1 ~Compensatory Ed.  Enrollment -Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 131 - - - DAVID O' DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 4 Enrollment - 1996-97 40 Cl) ~z 35 _2 _7 _ ___ -... ....-.... .......- - --.. -......- --........ ........ .... ..  w 30 0 =\u0026gt; 25 ~ (J) u_ 20 0 a: 15 .:: w a) 10 ~ :) 5 z 0 BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 9 5 2 Enrollment 15 13 7 Transported 11 9 3 3 7 7 1 1 ~Compensatory Ed. GJ Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 132 - - - DAVID O' DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: 30 (J) 1- z 25  w 0 ::) 20 IC/) LL 15 0 ffi 10 co ~ 5 ::) z 0 Compensatory Ed. Enrollment Transported LRSD Grade 5 Enrollment - 1996-97 BM BF WM 7 1 1 9 7 1 7 7 2 WF OM 4 7 4 2 ~ OF 1 1 ~Compensatory Ed. EJ Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 133 - - - DAVID O' DODD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 6 Enrollment - 1996-97 35 Cl) ~ 30 w o 25 ::) ~ 20 LL 0 a: 15 . wen 10 ~ ::) z 5 _./ 0 .,..__--,---~-,---------.---~ BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 7 4 6 1 Enrollment 13 11 9 1 Transported 11 9 7 1 rncompensatory Ed. [EJ Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONALP ROGRAM: COMPENSATORYE DUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 134 - - - FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 1 Enrollment - 1996-97 35 Cl) ~ 30 w 0 ::) J--( f) 25 ...  ~Compensatory Ed. Bill Enrollment LL 0 15 .......  -  - ----  -   -.-.......T...r.a..n. sported a: w co :?! ::) z 10 . 5 ...... 0 I\"---~----.----------.-------\u0026lt; BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 2 2 Enrollment 16 10 2 3 1 1 Transported 13 5 INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 135 - - - FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: 60 (J) r- z 50  w 0 :) r- 40 (J) LL 30 0 a: 20, ,, w a) ~ 10 :) z 0 Compensatory Ed. Enrollment Transported LRSD Grade 2 Enrollment - 1996-97 /. BM 8 22 16 BF 4 12 6 WM WF OM OF 2 2 ~Compensatory Ed. BE Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONALP ROGRAM: COMPENSATORYE DUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 136 - - - FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 3 Enrollment - 1996-97 25 CJ) rz- .. w 20 - - -- ........  ......-. -.. -- .,_, ......_.. 0 ~Compensatory Ed. :) r- 15 - --- - . -- ------  Enrollment CJ) LL Transported 0 10 - - - -- - - a: w co ~ 5 :) z 0 BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 2 3 1 Enrollment 9 8 5 2 Transported 8 4 1 INSTRUCTINOAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 137 - - - FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 4 Enrollment - 1996-97 35 ~z 30 w 0 25 .. :::, ~ 20  LL 0 15 ... a: wco 10 ~ 5 z 0 ~-----....---------~ BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 7 6 1 Enrollment 12 1 o 3 1 Transported 11 9 3 ~Compensatory Ed. EIEEl nrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 138 - - - FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 5 Enrollment - 1996-97 - .... - ......-. - ..........  . 25 20 15 5 .,.. ..... 0 !'-----.-----------------\u0026lt; BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 6 5 Enrollment 15 15 1 1 Transported 14 9 ~Compensatory Ed. D Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONALP ROGRAM: COMPENSATORYE DUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 139 - - - FAIR PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 6 Enrollment - 1996-97 35 Cl) ~ 30 ....::.Y -XX:XXX w ....  .... - ... - ... ' ...... -- - --   ...... -- - ......  .----------,  25 .  .. ./  ~ 20 . LL 0 15 a: wco 10 ~ 5 z 0 ,,___--,-----,-------,.---,-----,-.-~ BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 3 2 Enrollment 14 8 2 3 Transported 11 7 1 2 ~Compensatory Ed. CJ Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONALP ROGRAM: COMPENSATORYE DUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 140 -   FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 1 Enrollment - 1996-97 50 0------------------- BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 7 8 1 Enrollment 15 19 21 17 Transported 14 15 4 7 1 1 ~Compensatory Ed. Eu Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 141 -  - FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 2 Enrollment - 1996-97 60 z~ 50 ,' 10'...Xj(XX\u0026gt; w 0 :::) JC/) LL 0 a: w cc :E :::) z 40  30 .. 20  10 _./ 0 t\"----.----.------,.---T-\"\"-~~ BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 15 8 2 1 Enrollment 19 17 17 21 Transported 15 14 3 6 ~Compensatory Ed. E2l Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONALP ROGRAM: COMPENSATORYE DUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 142 - - - FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 3 Enrollment - 1996-97 (/) 1- 50 ru 40 0 ::) t- 30 (/) LL O 20 a: w ~ 10 ' ::) z ....................... -3g----- .. -- ..  .. ..  0 .,.__~-~-----~~ BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 5 4 4 1 Enrollment 13 18 17 18 Transported 11 17 8 5 Cill Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 143 - - - FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: Cl) 1- z LU 35 o 25 :) IC/) LL 0 a: w co ~ :) z 20 15 ...... 10 ..... 5 _./ 0 Compensatory Ed. Enrollment Tran~ported LRSD Grade 4 Enrollment - 1996-97 BM BF WM 6 9 2 12 10 14 10 9 WF OM 1 16 OF 1 ~Compensatory Ed. D Enrollment Trans_p9rted INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 144 - - - FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 5 Enrollment - 1996-97 50 Cf) rz- w 40 0 :) r- 30 .... Cf) LL 0 20  er: w co 10  ~ ::) z 0----------- BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 7 8 1 3 Enrollment 16 16 11 10 1 Transported 16 13 6 1 1 ~Compensatory Ed.  Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 145 - - - FOREST PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: 60 Cl) I- z w 50 0 :::, 40 I-Cl) LL 30 0 a: 20 w co ~ 10 :::::\u0026gt; z 0 Compensatory Ed. Enrollment Transported LRSD Grade 6 Enrollment - 1996-97 BM 7 15 13 BF WM WF OM OF 11 2 1 20 14 19 17 4 2 ~Compensatory Ed. CD Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONALS ERVICES: COMPENSATORYE DUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 146 - - J. A. FAIR HIGH SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 10 Enrollment - 1996-97 350 Cf) ~ 300 . w  250' ~ 200 LL 0 150 . a: cwo 100 ~ 50 z 0 !\"-~-----r----.---.-----.------------\u0026lt; BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 19 14 1 1 Enrollment 139 128 21 32 3 Transported 136 120 6 7 3 ~Compensatory Ed. [[I] Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: High 10-12. 147 J. A. FAIR HIGH SCHOOL: LRSD 250 150 . 100 _. 50 .- 0 Compensatory Ed. Enrollment Transported Grade 11 Enrollment - 1996-97 BM 14 105 95 ErnCompensatory Ed. - - - - - -- - [Bill Enrollment BF WM WF OM OF 5 1 2 112 23 30 3 100 8 7 1 1 1 Transported INSTRUCTIONALP ROGRAM: COMPENSATORYE DUCATION Instructional Program Type: High 10-12. 148 - - - J. A. FAIR HIGH SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 12 Enrollment - 1996-97 140 zfE 120 w 0 100 .. :.: . .. . :J 1225JCompensatEordy. ~ 80 u._ 0 60 . a: cwo 40 ~ :J 20  z 0 Compensatory Ed. Enrollment Transported BM 2 74 52 - . - BF WM WF OM OF 2 76 30 28 46 10 8 2 1 - [TI] Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: High 10-12. 149 - - - JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 1 Enrollment - 1996-97 -- - - - ------ -- - - - -------- 40 (J) rz 35  w 0 :J r (J) LL 0 a: w en ~ :J z 30 ...- . 25  20 .. 15 .. 10  5 ./ 0 ~----------------~ BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 5 7 1 Enrollment 14 14 28 17 1 1 Transported 13 14 1 ~Compensatory Ed.  Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONALP ROGRAM: COMPENSATORYE DUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 150 - - - JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 2 Enrollment - 1996-97 40 (J) rz- 35  ~ 30  ~ 25 (f) LL 20 0 a: 15 ~ 10 3 5 / z ------ .... - ------------1 - - .. - . ---- . - - -- - - -- --- 0 l'------,-----r------,---r-----r-----( BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 7 6 2 1 Enrollment 14 11 17 13 1 Transported 13 11 1 1 ~Compensatory Ed. m Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 151 - - - JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD  Grade 3 Enrollment - 1996-97 60 . 1-- - - - -- - - - ... . ... 0 ----------- BM BF WM WF OM Compensatory Ed. 13 9 1 3 Enrollment 19 15 16 23 1 Transported 19 15 1 1 .............. OF 1 l\u0026amp;ICompensatory Ed.  Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 152 - - - JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 4 Enrollment - 1996-97 Cl) rzw 0 :::) 50 .,_ 30 Cl) LL O 20 er: w ~ 10 :::) z ------ ----- ---- - ---- 0 l\"-----..--------------.-----.-------r BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 4 5 2 1 Enrollment 17 13 21 25 1 Transported 16 13 1 ~Compensatory Ed. CIJ Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 153 - - - JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 5 Enrollment - 1996-97 50 Cl) I-m 40 - 0 :::\u0026gt; ~Compensatory Ed. Ct-l) 30 - - -- - - -- --  - C2JE nrollment LL 0 a: LU ~ 10- ::::\u0026gt; z 0----------- BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 4 5 2 1 Enrollment 16 19 23 16 Transported 16 19 Transported INSTRUCTIONALP ROGRAM: COMPENSATORYE DUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 154 - - - JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: 35 Cl) rz- 30 w 0 25 ::) ..... Cl) 20 LL 0 15  a: w 10 co ~ 5 . ::) z 0 Compensatory Ed. Enrollment Transported LRSD Grade 6 Enrollment - 1996-97 BM 4 10 10   ..2. 0 - ..... .. -..  ..  - - BF WM WF OM OF 3 1 10 29 19 2 10 ~Compensatory Ed. E:2E1n rollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 155 - - - PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 1 Enrollment - 1996-97 ~ z w 0 60 50 , .::,,_ 40 Cl) LL 30 0 a: w en ~ ::) z 20 , 10 .. - - - -- - .. -- -~- - .,. __ - - 47 0 r----r-----,---..---,-~--,-------f' BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 5 13 1 Enrollment 16 23 19 14 Transported 8 11 ~Compensatory Ed.  Enrollment -Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 156 - - - PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 2 Enrollment - 1996-97 60 ~ 47 zw 50 - --- - - .. -- 0 .:J.. ... 40 (I) LL 30  0 ffi 20 cc ~ 10, :J z 0 ,.._----------.--------~~ BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 7 13 1 3 1 Enrollment 18 23 18 12 Transported 9 11 1 ~Compensatory Ed. Go Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 157 - - PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 3 Enrollment - 1996-97 35 CJ) ~ 30 w o 25 :::\u0026gt; JC/) LL 0 a: w ClJ ~ :::\u0026gt; z 15 ... 10 ... 5 ./ 0 ,.....__--.---~----------~ BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 3 4 2 1 Enrollment 17 13 19 20 4 Transported 11 8 1 2 ~Compensatory Ed.  Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 158 - - - PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 4 Enrollment - 1996-97 50 30  20  0 ,.___~---.----r---~---.---~ BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 7 9 Enrollment 21 20 16 13 1 Transported 13  1 o 1 ~Compensatory Ed. Ll Enrollment -Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 159 - - PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 6 Enrollment - 1996-97 .......... _,, -. ..,_. . - -- - - -- 35 Cl) -- - -- - .,._ z 30 w 0 25 ~Compensatory Ed. .:), ._ Cl) 20 @ Enrollment LL 0 15 Transported a: w 10 en ~ :::\u0026gt; 5 z 0 BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 3 2 Enrollment 14 16 12 9 2 Transported 11 12 1 2 INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 161 ... - - - TERRY ELEMENTAR SCHOOL: LRSD 50 C.,l) _ z w 40 0 :.:,, _ 30 Cl) LL 0 20 a: w Cll 10 . ~ ::, z 0 Compensatory Ed. Enrollment ,. Transported Grade 1 Enrollment - 1996-97 - - BM BF WM 10 6 2 18 16 18 14 10 3 - WF 3 26 4 - . -- -- OM OF 2 2 3 2 ~Compensatory Ed. D Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 162  ~. - - TERRY ELEMENTAR - SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 2 Enrollment - 1996-97 40 (f) Iz- 35 w 30 0 ~Compensatory Ed. :::) I- 25 D Enrollment (f) LL 20 Transported 0 a: 15 w co 10 ~ :::) 5 z 0 BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 9 5 1 1 Enrollment 16 16 18 17 2 2 Transported 10 9 4 6 1 INSTRUCTIONALP ROGRAM: COMPENSATORYE DUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 163 I, - - TERRY ELEMENTAR - SCHOOL: LRSD ~ Grade 3 Enrollment - 1996-97 50 Cf) t-z w 40 0 EZJCompensatory Ed. ::) t- 30 Enrollment Cf) LL Transported 0 20 a: w ,I en ~ 10 ::) z 0 BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 3 9 4 2 Enrollment 17 22 27 10 4 Transported 14 12 11 3 1 INSTRUCTIONALP ROGRAM: COMPENSATORYE DUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 164 - - TERRY ELEMENTAR - SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 4 Enrollment - 1996-97 50 Cl) rz- w 40 0 EZJCompensatorEy d. :::\u0026gt; ...... 30  Enrollment Cl) LL Transported 0 20 a: w ,1 co :?! 10 ::) z 0 BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 10 9 5 3 1 Enrollment 17 22 27 10 4 Transported 14 12 11 3 1 INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 165 i. - - TERRY ELEMENTAR - SCHOOL: LRSD '\n. 50 (f) I- z w 40 . 0 :J I- 30  (f) LL 0 20 a: w ca ~ 10 :J z 0 Compensatory Ed. Enrollment ,. Transported Grade 5 Enrollment - 1996-97 BM BF WM 7 8 1 17 20 12 14 16 6 WF OM 1 18 2 9 1 OF 2 1 IZJCompensatory Ed.  Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION I nstructidnal Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 166 ~. - - TERRY ELEMENTAR .,, - SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 6 Enrollment - 1996-97 40 Cl) rz- 35 w 30 0 C?aCompensatorEy d. ::\u0026gt; r- 25  Enrollment Cl) u_ 20 -Transported 0 a: 15 w co 10 ~ ::\u0026gt; 5 z 0 BM BF WM WF OM OF CompensatoryE d. 7 1 1 2 2 Enrollment 15 13 14 16 3 1 Transported 12 1 1 3 4 1 INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 167 - -  WILSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 1 Enrollment - 1996-97 50 ~ ~ 40 0 :) 1- 30 Cl) LL 0 a: w co ~ :::\u0026gt; z 20 0 ic- __ _,,___ _______ -~---1 BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 3 7 1 Enrollment 18 26 2 Transported 7 6 3 1 1 ~Compensatory Ed. - B Enrollment -Transported INSTRUCTIONALP ROGRAM:C OMPENSATORYE DUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 168 - - - WILSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD 60 Cl) r- z 50 , w 0 :) r- 40 Cl) LL 30 0 er: 20 w en ~ 10 :) z 0 Compensatory Ed. Enrollment Transported Grade 2 Enrollment - 1996-97 BM BF 9 9 24 15 14 11 WM WF OM OF 3 1 3 3 1 1 ~Compensatory Ed. D Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 169 - - - WILSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 3 Enrollment - 1996-97 60 en I- z w 50 0 :J 40 10]Compensatory Ed. I-en ffiTEI nrollment LL 30 0 -Transported a: 20 w co ~ 10 ::) z 0 BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 13 5 1 Enrollment 29 19 1 5 1 Transported 9 8 1 1 1 1 INSTRUCTIONALP ROGRAM:C OMPENSATORYE DUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 170 - - - WILSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD Grade 4 Enrollment - 1996-97 ~Compensatory Ed. ---- .. - BTI Enrollment -Transported 2 BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 9 9 1 Enrollment 24 15 3 3 1 Transported 14 11 3 1 INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 171 - - - WILSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD 50 Cl) I-z UJ 40 0 :) I- 30 Cl) LL 0 20 a: UJ co ~ 10 . :) z 0 Compensatory Ed. Enrollment Transported Grade 5 Enrollment - 1996-97 BM BF WM 7 5 20 11 5 12 5 3 WF OM 3 1 1 OF 1 1 ~Compensatory Ed. EITEIJn roll ment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 172 - - - WILSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: LRSD 30 en J- z 25  w 0 ::) 20 J- en LL 15 0 a: w 10 c:o ~ 5 ::) z 0 Compensatory Ed. Enrollment Transported Grade 6 Enrollment - 1996-97 BM 3 10 8 ... - - 26 ... BF WM WF OM OF 2 2 14 5 2 10 2 2 4 ~Compensatory Ed. ETEil nrollment Transported ~------'-----'----'--- ~-'------'-- INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 173 - - - BELWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: 20 10  5 ./ 0 Compensatory Ed. Enrollment Transported NLRSD Grade 1 Enrollment - 1996-97 BM BF WM 7 4 6 7 4 6 3 1 1 WF OM 1 1 OF 1 1 ~Compensatory Ed. D Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONALP ROGRAM: COMPENSATORYE DUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 174 - - - BELWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: NLRSD Grade 2 Enrollment - 1996-97 25 ._. ......-.. -- ...-. ..........-...... ......................................_...._...._... _ .........-... ............-..... . (J) r z w 20 0 :J 1221CompensatoryE d. r 15 Cl) .........-.. ......._................. ..............E..E..J..E ....n...r..o llment LL 0 10 a: w en 5 . ~ :J z 0 II\"----------.-~---,--~ BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 9 7 6 3 Enrollment 9 7 6 3 Transported 4 3 1 1 1 Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 175 - - - BELWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: NLRSD Grade 3 Enrollment - 1996-97 20 _____1 6_ ____ _ 0 ...-----,----..---.-------.-------~ BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 5 6 6 1 Enrollment 5 6 6 1 Transported 2 4 2 1 rncompensatory Ed. u:J Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 176 - - - BELWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: 30 0 Compensatory Ed. Enrollment Transported NLRSD Grade 4 Enrollment - 1996-97 BM BF WM 9 6 3 9 6 3 8 2 1 WF 9 9 OM OF ~Compensatory Ed. C5JE nrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 177 - - - BELWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: NLRSD Grade 5 Enrollment - 1996-97 20 ~ z ~ 15 ::J rC/) LL 10 0 a: w co 5 ~ ::J z 0 l'---------.------------r BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 4 3 7 5 Enrollment 4 3 7 5 Transported 2 1 2 ~Compensatory Ed. EZJE nrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 178 - - - BELWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: NLRSD Grade 6 Enrollment - 1996-97 25 ~ ctj 20  0 :::, IC/) LL 0 a: w co ~ ::, z 15 . .,.../. 19 0 ,._____ ____ --,--_- ___ --\u0026lt;' BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 5 7 7 9 Enrollment 5 7 7 9 Transported 2 5 1 1 1 1 1 rncompensatory Ed.  Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 179 - - - BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: NLRSD Grade 1 Enrollment - 1996-97 - ------------------- 80 Cl) Jz ----05  - ---- - - - - -------- - - - - ~ 60 :) JC/) LL 0 a: w en ~ :) z 50  40 .... 30 ./ 20 10 --.2. 0 - --- --- . .. - -- 15 0 l\"------------------.-------r BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 34 30 1 o 7 3 Enrollment 34 30 1 0 7 3 Transported 2 1 ~Compensatory Ed. _ G Enrollment _ _ _ Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 180 - - - BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: 80 0 Compensatory Ed. Enrollment Transported NLRSD Grade 2 Enrollment - 1996-97 BM BF 35 26 35 26 3 1 ~Compensatory Ed. rEJ Enrollment _ 19 ___ _ ____ __ ___________ __T ransported 10 WM WF OM OF 9 5 9 5 1 INSTRUCTIONALP ROGRAM: COMPENSATORYE DUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 181 - - - BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: NLRSD Grade 3 Enrollment - 1996-97 - - .. --- - - - -- - - - _.. _.. - - ----- 80 .. 16 ----1-2----- -..- - 40 30 ..... 20 , ..... 10 ....... ---~J~:~=~~ ll1:~~ 0 ..---~---,------,~--------.---~ BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 33 25 8 6 1 Enrollment 33 25 8 6 1 Transported 3 1 ~Compensatory Ed. ED Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 182 - - - BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: 80 0 Compensatory Ed. Enrollment Transported NLRSD Grade 4 Enrollment - 1996-97 BM BF WM 35 22 10 35 22 10 3 2 1 WF OM 3 3 1 OF 1 1 ~Compensatory Ed. D Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 183 - - - BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: NLRSD Grade 5 Enrollment - 1996-97 60 - --- - - - -- - --- - - ----- ---- (J) rz50.,.. w 0 :J r( J) LL 0 a: w cc ~ :J z 40 .. .. 30 ,.. ... 20 _./ 10 ...... ------ 0 ----,.-----.-------- BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 25 25 5 7 Enrollment 25 25 5 7 Transported 3 3 rncompensatory Ed. @J1 Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 184 - - - BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: NLRSD Grade 6 Enrollment - 1996-97 - . - ... - - . ---- - ....----------, ~Compensatory Ed. ------ -- -  - - --- --  Enrollment , . 30 .... _ .:.:. ..... . .  .... . :. . .. --- - - - ---  -  - ------ Transported 20 //  . :_:: : : : : . 10 ,.  .: ..:'. 0 ,._ _____________ ---\u0026lt; BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 30 29 9 9 1 Enrollment 30 29 9 9 1 Transported 3 INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 185 - - - GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: NLRSD Grade 1 Enrollment - 1996-97 25 Cl) 1- wz 20 0 :) t- 15 .. Cl) LL 0 a: 10 LU ca ~ 5 ::) z -------------- - .. ----------1 0 ic---,----r-----,--------.--~ BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 8 11 4 2 Enrollment 8 11 4 2 ~Compensatory Ed. E:1 Enrollment INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 186 - - - GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: NLRSD Grade 2 Enrollment - 1996-97 Cl) I- 25 m 20 - 0 ::) IC/) LL 0 cc w en ~ ::) z 15 . 1 0   5 ,,.- ~Compensatory Ed. - ------ ------- D Enrollment Transported 0 ,....__ ___________ ---r BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 1 O 1 o 2 3 Enrollment 1 O 9 2 4 Transported 1 INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 187 - - - GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: NLRSD Grade 3 Enrollment - 1996-97 30 / 26 (1J-) 2 5 .. DOCDOC~s\u0026amp;I DOC--..~'v'.,)(- z w 0 ::) I(/) LL 0 15  ~x~~= IXXXXXXX a: :::\"..:_I .X X XXXXx w 10 ..- . . ca ~ ::) z - - -- ---- -- -- - --- ,-- ~- ,____ -- 0 ~v-----------------------------------~ BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 14 8 Enrollment 12 9 1 1 1 2 ~Compensatory Ed. E2JE nrollment INSTRUCTIONALP ROGRAM: COMPENSATORYE DUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 188 - - - GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: (I) rz w 0 ::) 25 r- 15 (I) LL O 10 a: w OJ ~ :::\u0026gt; z 5 .. 0 Compensatory Ed. Enrollment Transported NLRSD Grade 4 Enrollment - 1996-97 19 BM BF WM 7 9 4 7 10 4 1 WF 8 7 - -- --- OM OF ~Compensatory Ed. will] Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. - - - GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: NLRSD Grade 5 Enrollment - 1996-97 30 25 - - -2 6 - - ---- - --- - - --- - - ------ - - - - - - - - . - -- - . - - -- - ~Compensatory Ed. CIJ Enrollment g Transported 10 , 5 ..,. ..... ..llllfti ---- ---- ..... ------------------ 0 ----....---------.------.--- BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 6 13 4 Enrollment 6 13 4 Transported 1 1 Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 19() - - - GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: NLRSD Grade 6 Enrollment - 1996-97 40 ~z ~ 30 ::) ..... Cl) u_ 20 0 a: w co 10 ~ ::) z 0 ,._--T-\"-~----,,---------,..----r BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 15 1 O 3 3 Enrollment 16 1 O 3 3 Transported 5 2 ~Compensatory Ed. 6 Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 191 - - NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: NLRSD Grade 1 Enrollment - 1996-97 en Jz 40 ~ 30 :) Jen LL 20 0 a: w ca 10 ~ :::\u0026gt; z 0 IL------.------.---------.---~---\u0026lt; BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 16 11 16 18 1 2 Enrollment 16 11 16 18 1 2 Transported 2 6 1 2 l2Z1Compensatory Ed. @Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 192 - - NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: NLRSD Grade 2 Enrollment - 1996-97 Cf) 1- z w 60 50  .  40 I- ~ 30 0 a: 20 ' w cc :E 10 , ::) z o~~-~---~-~--\u0026lt; BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 15 15 25 13 3 4 Enrollment 15 15 25 13 3 4 Transported 4 1 2 2 ~Compensatory Ed. [2] Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6 . . 193 - - NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: NLRSD Grade 3 Enrollment - 1996-97 Cf) J- 50 m 40 0 ::J JC/) LL 0 a: w co ~ ::J z 30  10 ,.,. -- -41- - - --- - - - -- 36 35 0 ,....__---,.-----.----...---~----.--------r BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 7 18 18 17 2 4 Enrollment 7 18 18 17 2 4 Transported 1 5 1 1 2 ~Compensatory Ed. EJ Enrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONALP ROGRAM: COMPENSATORYE DUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 194 - - NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY ~z w 0 ::) t(/) LL 50 40 . 30  O 20 a: w ~ 10 ' ::\u0026gt; z 0 Compensatory Ed. Enrollment Transported SCHOOL: NLRSD Grade 4 Enrollment - 1996-97 BM BF WM 15 11 14 15 11 14 2 4 WF OM 20 3 20 3 OF 2 2 1 12ZJCompensatoEryd . GEEJ nrollment -Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 195 - - NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: NLRSD Grade 5 Enrollment - 1996-97 35 ~z 30 w 0 ::) tC/) LL 0 a: w co ~ ::) z 25  20  15  10 5 ... - - - - - 30 - - - - - - - - ..... ... ..... ~- 0 ,.___~---.------.-----~ BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 8 12 15 1 o 3 3 Enrollment 8 12 15 1 o 3 3 Transported 2 1 ~Compensatory Ed. LEJE nrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 196 - - NORTH HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: NLRSD Grade 6 Enrollment - 1996-97 60 ~ z 50  w 0 ::, 40 JC/) LL 30  0 wer : 20 (0 ---- ~ 10  :z:, AIII - - - -I 46 0--------------- BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 14 13 23 18 1 Enrollment 14 13 23 18 1 Transported 2 3 4 4 1 ~Compensatory Ed. E:2E1n rollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 197 - - - PARK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: NLRSD Grade 1 Enrollment - 1996-97 50 Cl) I- zw 40 0 =:, ~Compensatory Ed. t- 30 .... CJ) l/~ ~~11 \u0026lt;\u0026gt;'\"~XX\u0026gt;: ..- .. .........  ...    Enrollment LL 0 20 a: Transported -- ......................... -................... . w co ~ 10 =:, z BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 15 1 o 6 18 Enrollment 15 1 O 6 18 Transported 9 7 INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 198 - - - PARK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: NLRSD Grade 2 Enrollment - 1996-97 40 U) tz- 35 ~ 30 :) t-U) 34 fgaCompensatory Ed. ... . Eill Enrollment LL 0 20 . 15 10 . ---- ... Transported a: w co ~ :::, z 5 ....... 0 !\"'------,-----,..-----,---~---r BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 11 13 12 7 1 Enrollment 11 13 12 7 1 Transported 6 8 INSTRUCTIONALP ROGRAM:C OMPENSATORYE DUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 199 - - - PARK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: NLRSD Grade 3 Enrollment - 1996-97 50 -- - -- -- - - - - - -- - Cl) I- 38 m 40. 0 ::J IC/) u_ 0 a: w ca ~ ::J z 30  , 10 ..... 0 l\"--------.-------.-----------r BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 6 16 1 o 9 Enrollment 6 16 1 O 9 Transported 3 6 ~Compensatory Ed.  G:JEnrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM: COMPENSATORY EDUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 200 - - - PARK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: NLRSD Grade 4 Enrollment - 1996-97 30 0-------------- BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 9 8 13 6 Enrollment 9 8 13 6 Transported 7 4 ~Compensatory Ed. CEJ nrollment Transported INSTRUCTIONALP ROGRAM: COMPENSATORYE DUCATION Instructional Program Type: Elementary 1-6. 201 - - - PARK HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: NLRSD Grade 5 Enrollment - 1996-97 ---- --- - - -- - --- - - -- - -- 40 Cl) 1z- 35  w 0 ::) IC/) LL 0 a: w en ~ ::::) z 20  15 _./_ 10 _./ 5 / 28 28 0 ---------------.---- BM BF WM WF OM OF Compensatory Ed. 13 7 14 14 Enrollment 13 7 14 14 Transported 9 6 - ~Compensatory Ed. CJ Enrollment Tra\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_240","title":"Arkansas Department of Education's Semiannual Monitoring Report, Volume 2","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["1997-02-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Educational statistics","Education and state","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Department of Education's Semiannual Monitoring Report, Volume 2"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/240"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n CONTENTS VOLUME II Budget Information Overview ...................................... ,  . . 598 Budget Information Summary FY 95-96 \u0026amp; FY 96-97 ................... . . . . 599 Program Cost Summary FY 95-96 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 601 Little Rock School District Program Cost FY 95-96 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 607 Little Rock School District Program Cost FY 96-97 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 623 North Little Rock School District Program Cost FY 95-96 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 636 North Little Rock School District Program Cost FY 96-97 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 651 Pulaski County Special School District Program Cost FY 95-96 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 663 Pulaski County Special School District Program Cost FY 96-97 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 679 Transportation Cost Summary FY 95-96 \u0026amp; FY 96-97 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 692 Little Rock School District Transportation Cost FY 95-96 \u0026amp; FY 96-97 . . . . . . . . . 699  North Little Rock School District Transportation Cost FY 95-96 \u0026amp; 96-97 ...... 701  Pulaski County Special School District Transportation Cost FY 95-96 \u0026amp; 96-97 . 704 Legal Fees Summary FY 95-96 \u0026amp; 96-97 ............................  ...... 707 Little Rock School District Legal Fees FY 95-96 \u0026amp; 96-97 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 713 North Little Rock School District Legal Fees FY 95-96 \u0026amp; 96-97 ............... 716 Pulaski County Special School District Legal Fees FY 95-96 \u0026amp; FY 96-97 . . . . . . . 719 Compensatory Education FY 95-96 \u0026amp; 96-97 ............................... 722 Magnet School Cost FY 95-96 \u0026amp; 96-97 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 727 Student Discipline Expulsion PCSSD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 732 Perceptual Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 740 ECOE Monitoring for Cycle I Schools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 746 F. BUDGET INFORM.A TION The Allen Letter requires the collection of the following financial reports quarterly or monthly were available: 1. Cost of operating all elementary programs, junior high school programs, and high school programs by funding source (local/regular state/federal and special state desegregation funding.) 2. Transportation cost and funding source. 3. All legal fees reported by type of services. 4. Compensatory Education Program costs. 5. Magnet school cost. This information follows for each school district in Pulaski County. Cost of operating all elementary programs, junior high school programs, and high school programs by funding source (local/regular state/federal and special state desegregation funding). Financial information for FY 96-97 is presented for the three school districts in Pulaski County as specified by the Allen Letter and the Settlement Agreement. The financial information contains actual expenses for the Little Rock School District (LRSD) and the North Little Rock School District (NLRSD) and the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD). The financials include schedules on Total Program Costs for FY 96-97 Cost per Student information, Total Program Costs for Elementary, Junior High and High Schools, and Teacher and School Administrator Costs. 598  BUDGET INFORMATION FY 95/96 \u0026amp; FY 96/97 599    F . BUDGET INFORMATION The Allen Letter, the Pulaski County School Desegregation Case Settlement Agreement dated September 28, 1989 (Settlement Agreement) and the Implementation Plan detail specific monitoring responsibilities regarding financial information and various desegregation financial obligations of the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) to the three school districts in Pulaski County. The financial monitoring responsibilities detailed in the Allen Letter are presented in this section of the February 1, 1997 Monitoring Report. The Settlement Agreement and Implementation Plan state that the ADE is financially responsible for the following: desegregation compensatory education payments\npayments in lieu of formula\npayments for operating the six original magnet schools in the LRSD\nM-to-M incentive payments for sending and receiving schools\nMagnet and M-toM transportation costs\n$20 million in loans to the LRSD~ attorney's fees\n$75,000 annually to the Magnet Review Committee~ and $200,000 annually to the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM) . SOURCES: The ADE General Finance Section and the ADE Local Fiscal Services Section. 600 PROGRAM COST FY 95/96 \u0026amp; FY 96/97 601    F . BUDGET INFORMATION 1. Cost of operating all elementary programs, junior high school programs, and high school programs by funding source (local/regular state/federal and special state desegregation funding). Financial information for FY 95/96 and FY 96/97 is presented for the three school districts in Pulaski County as specified by the Allen Letter and the Settlement Agreement. The information for FY 95/97 reflects each district's expenses for the last fiscal year, and the information for FY 96/97 reflects each district's budget for the current fiscal year. The schedules included in this portion of the Budget Section contain information on Total Program Costs, Cost per Student information, Total Program Costs for Elementary, Junior High and High Schools, and Teacher and School Administrator Costs. The financial information for each district reflects an increase in total expenses in each of the three school districts in Pulaski County in FY 95/96 and additional increases budgeted for FY 96/97. Total expenses for the LRSD increased 4.2 percent in FY 95/96 and are budgeted to increase an additional 11.6 percent in FY 96/97 according to district representatives. LRSD's total expenses increased 3. 6 percent in FY 95/96 and are budgeted to increase an additional 18.4 percent in FY 96/97 according to district representatives. Total expenses in the PCSSD increased 4.1 percent in FY 95/96 and are budgeted to increase an additional 12.3 percent in FY 96/97 according to district representatives. The enrollment figures for the LRSD as of October I, 1995 showed an increase of 2.3 percent for FY 95/96 and an increase as of October 1, 1996 of 0.4 percent for FY 96/97. Enrollment for the NLRSD as of October 1, 1995 indicated a decrease in FY 95/96 of 1. 7 percent and an increase of l. 9 percent for FY 96/97 from the enrollment figures as of October l, 1996. The enrollment figures for the PCS SD showed a decline in the FY 95/96 enrollment for October 1, 1995 of 0.3 percent and a decrease in the FY 96/97 enrollment as of October 1, 1996 of 1.2 percent. SOURCES: The Finance qffices (?/ each of the three districts in Pulaski County, the ADE General Finance Section, and the ADJ~ Local Nscal Services Section . 602    F . BUDGET INFORMATION (Continued) 1. Cost of operating all elementary programs, junior high school programs, and high school programs by funding source (local/regular state/federal and special state desegregation funding). (Continued) The LRSD's cost per student figures increased 1.8 percent in FY 95/96 and are budgeted to increase 11.2 percent in FY 96/97. The NLRSD's cost per student figures increased 5 .4 percent in FY 9 5/96 and are budgeted to increase 16. 3 percent in FY 96/97. The cost per student figures in the PCSSD for FY 95/96 increased 4.4 percent and are budgeted to increase 13.6 percent in FY 96/97. The increases in the cost per student figures for FY 95/96 and FY 96/97 in each of the districts correspond to the increases in total cost for each of the districts and fluctuations in enrollment for FY 95/96 and FY 96/97. The LRSD received funding for desegregation from the ADE in FY 95/96 totaling $17,668,136 and incurred desegregation expenses of $38,391,254, of which $23,396,956 was eligible for funding from the special desegregation funding from the ADE. The LRSD has budgeted their desegregation expense for FY 96/97 at $44,989,746, of which $27,670, I 03 will be eligible for funding from the desegregation funding from the ADE, and should received funding from the ADE for desegregation of approximately $21,413,282 . The NLRSD received funding for desegregation from the ADE in FY 95/96 totaling $1,556,119 and incurred desegregation expenses of$2,124,324. The district has budgeted their desegregation ex pen e for FY 96/97 at $1,603,938 and should received funding for desegregation from the ADE totaling approximately $1,785,092. Of the amount expected to be received by the district in FY 96/97, $297,020 of the funds that they have received in FY 96/97 were for transportation costs from FY 91/92 through FY 95/96 that under normal circum tances would have been received in prior periods. The PCSSD received funding for desegregation from the ADE in FY 95/96 totaling $9,529,691 and incurred desegregation expen es of$ l 0,807,566. The district has budgeted their de egregation expen e for FY 96/97 at 12,554,647 and should receive funding for de egregation from th ADE totaling 6,502,412. All of the information received from the chool di trict ha b en r conciled for accuracy and reliability with no e c ption not d II of the di. trict are utilizing the fund receiv d from the DE fi r d gregation purpo e a ording to r c rd fr m the di trict OURCES: The N11a11ceq [(ic 1s (?( each of the three distnct., 111 Pulaski Co1111',t the ADE General Finance Sect,011,a nd the AJJl!.L.:o cal Fiscal Services 5,ection. 603 PULASKI COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTS TOTAL PROGRAM OPERATING COST FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES LOCAUSTATE FEDERAL LEA# SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS LEGAL PROGRAM DISTRICT PROGRAM 60-01 LITTLE ROCK 59,499,209 31,474,967 6,464,867 328,745 3,469,669 3.011,807 5,224,242 60-02 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 29,067,633 9,851,918 1,264,088 21,980 1,975,332 1,192,347 1,491,606 60-03 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL 58,635,805 20,711,728 5,733,229 111,498 2,242,921 1,370,124 3,967,329 Funding Categories Local \u0026amp; State This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. Federal Deseg This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. This category consists of funding for desegregation purposes. Expense Categories DESEGREGATION DISTRICT INCENTIVE MAGNET TRANS 7,789,126 7,618,145 14,752,306 2,720,432 232,811 0 0 301,541 5,206 530 0 0 1,553,100 Local \u0026amp; State This category consists of expenses incurred relative to regular program expense, district expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded by unrestricted local, state and federal sources. This category consists of expenses incurred relative to federal program expense and district expense funded by restricted federal sources. LEGAL TOTAL 287,003 142,640,518 98,366 45,497,622 295,802 99,828,066 Federal Deseg This category consists of expenses incurred relative to desegregation program expense, district expense, incentive school expense, magnet expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded from desegregation sources. Total Category FY 9~6 The totals in this column represent the total expense for each school district for fiscal year 1995/199'5. OURCES: The Finance Offices of each of the school districts in Pulaski County. 604 PULASKI COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTS TOTAL PROGRAM OPERATING BUDGET FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES LOCAUSTATE FEDERAL DESEGREGATION LEA# SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS LEGAL PROGRAM DISTRICT PROGRAM DISTRICT INCENTIVE MAGNET TRANS LEGAL 60-01 LITTLE ROCK 67,909,531 32,888,201 6,026,174 219,950 3,053,330 4,114,111 6,449,163 9,458,364 8,638,910 17,361,466 2,886,793 195,050 60-02 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 32,906,892 14,022,001 1,742,631 35,000 2,164,686 1,406,182 804,070 345,558 0 0 369,312 85,000 60-03 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL 70,573,372 18,480,963 5,865,352 155,000 3,501,563 945,075 5,681,797 4,831,645 0 0 1,781,205 260,000 Funding Categories Local \u0026amp; State This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. Federal This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. Deseg This category consists of funding for desegregation purposes Expense Categories Local \u0026amp; State This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to regular program expense, district expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded by unrestricted local, state and federal sources. Federal Thts category consists of budgeted expenses relative to federal program expense and district expense funded by restricted federal sources. Deseg This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to desegregation program expense, district expense, incentive expense, magnet expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded from desegregation sources, Total Category FY 96197 The totals in this column represent the total budget for each school district for fiscal year 1996/1997. OURCES: The Finance Offices of each of the school districts in Pulaski County. 605 TOTAL 159,201,043 53,883,330 112,075,972 DISTRICT LITTLE ROCK NORTH LITTLE ROCK PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL Enrollment FY 95196 FY 96197 Percent Variance Cost per Student FY 95196 FY 96197 Percent Variance Total Program Expense FY 95/96 FY 96/97 Percent Variance SOURCES: PULASKI COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTS PROGRAM VARIANCES FOR FY 96/97 ENROLLMENT COST PER STUDENT TOTAL PROGRAM EXPENSE PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT FY 95/96 FY 96/97 VARIANCE FY 95/96 FY96/97 VARIANCE FY95/96 FY 96/97 VARIANCE 24,154 24 245 0.4% 5,905 6,566 11.2% 142,640.518 159,201,043 11.6% 8,802 8.966 1.9% 5,169 6,010 163% 45,497,622 53,883,330 18.4% 20.285 20,047 -12% 4 921 5,591 13.6% 99,828.066 112,075,972 123% For reporting purposes, the October 1, 1995 enrollment figures verified and published by the ADE are the figures used. For reporting purposes, the October 1, 1996 enrollment figures verified and published by the ADE are the figures used. The difference in the FY 96/97 enrollment and the FY 95/96 enrollment expressed as a percentage. A positive variance indicates the percentage increase in enrollment for FY 96/97. A negative variance indicates the percentage decrease in enrollment for FY 96/97. The average cost per student for the district for FY 95/96. The average cost per student is calculated by dividing total program costs by total enrollment. The average cost per student for the district for FY 96/97. The average cost per student is calculated by dividing total program costs by total enrollment. The difference in the FY 96/97 cost per student and the FY 95/96 cost per student expressed as a percentage. A positive variance indicates the percentage increase in the cost per student for FY 96/97. A negative variance indicates the percentage decrease in the cost per student for FY 96/97. Total expenses for the school district for FY 95/96. Total budget for the school district for FY 96/97. The difference in the FY 96/97 total budget and the total cost for FY 95/96 expressed as a percentage. A positive variance indicates the percentage increase in the total budget for FY 96/97. A negative variance indicates the percentage decrease in the total budget for FY 96/97. The Finance Offices of each of the school districts in Pulaski County. 606 LRSD PROGRAM COST FY 95/96 607    F . BUDGET INFORMATION 1. Cost of operating all elementary programs, junior high school programs, and high school programs by funding source (local/regular state/federal and special state desegregation funding). Little Rock School District (LRSD) The following is a summary of the LRSD Program Cost Section of the February 1, 1997 Monitoring Report. Total program expense for the district is separated by funding source and expense category within the funding source. Total program expense is actual for FY 95/96 and budgeted for FY 96/97. Separate schedules indicate the total program expense for the Cycle 1 schools. The programs funded by the Cycle 1 schools are also included. Teacher expense and school administrator expense are also presented for the Cycle 1 schools. Cost per student information is presented for the: district\nelementary school programs~ junior high school programs\nhigh school programs\nand Cycle 1 school programs. Total Operating Expenses The district's total operating expenses for FY 95/96 were $142,640,518, which was an increase of $5,692,632 or 4.2 percent over FY 94/95 expenses of $136,947,886. The district's total operating expenses for FY 96/97 are budgeted at $159,201,043 resulting in an increase in operating cost of $16,560,525 or 11.6 percent for the current fiscal year. Elementary school operating costs rose from $74,914,489 in FY 94/95 to $78,593,013 in FY 95/96. Elementary school operating costs are budgeted to rise in FY 96/97 to $88,957,879 or 13 .2 percent for the current fiscal year. Operating costs for junior high schools increased 3 .1 percent in FY 95/96 over the operating cost for FY 94/95 of $31,583,460. The cost of operating the district's junior high schools is budgeted to increase $2,753, l 08 or 8.5 percent in FY 96/97 to $35,295,313. Operating costs for high schools increased from $30,449,937 in FY 94/95 to $31,505,300 in FY 95/96. The operating costs for the district's high schools are budgeted to increase 10.9 percent to $34,947,851 in FY 96/97. SOURCES: The Little Rock , . .\\'chool District Finance Office, the ADE General hnance ,Section, and the ADE Local Fiscal Services Section. 608    F . BUDGET INFORMATION (Continued) 1. Cost of operating all elementary programs, junior high school programs, and high school programs by funding source (local/regular state/federal and special state desegregation funding). (Continued) Little Rock School District (LRSD) (Continued) Enrollment Total district enrollment as of October 1, 1995 increased by 543 students or 2.3 percent in FY 95/96 for a total enrollment of 24,154 as compared with total enrollment as of October 1, 1994 of 23,611. Enrollment increased in FY 96/97 to 24,245 as of October 1, 1996 resulting in an increase of 0.4 percent. Enrollment in the district's elementary schools increased from 12,959 in FY 94/95 to 13,348 or 3.0 percent in FY 95/96, and elementary enrollment at October 1, 1996 increased to 13,525 for FY 96/97. Junior high school enrollment declined by 58 students from 5,681 in FY 94/95 to 5,623 or 1.0 percent in FY 95/96, and enrollment in the junior high school in FY 96/97 further declined 2. 5 percent to 5,486 as of October I, 1996 . Enrollment in the district's high schools increased from 4,971 in FY 94/95 to 5,183 or 4.3 percent in FY 95/96, and the October 1, 1996 enrollment figures for the district's high schools showed an increase in FY 96/97 to 5,234. Cost per Student Rate The di trict's co t per student rate increased from $5,800 in FY 94/95 to 5,905 in FY 95/96 resulting in an overall co t per tu dent increa e of 1. 8 percent. The cost per student rate is budgeted to increa e 11.2 percent to $6,566 in FY 96/97. The elementary co t per tudent rate increa ed l. 9 percent in FY 95/96 from $5,781 in FY 94/95 to $5,888 in FY 95/96. The elementary co t per tudent rate is budgeted to increa e an additional 11. 7 percent in FY 96/97 to $6,577. 0 RCE 1l1e Little Ro k School District Fi11a11ceq [(i e, the Al /-.,G e11eral Finance l 'ectio11, a11d the ADJ~ Lo al Fiscal Services 5,'edion. 609    F . BUDGET INFORMATION (Continued) 1. Cost of operating all elementary programs, junior high school programs, and high school programs by funding source (local/regular state/federal and special state desegregation funding). (Continued) Little Rock School District (LRSD) (Continued) Cost per Student Rate (Continued) The junior high school cost per student rate increased in FY 95/96 to $5,787 from the FY 94/95 cost per student rate of $5,559. The junior high school cost per student rate is budgeted to increase an additional 11.2 percent in FY 96/97 to $6,434. The high school cost per student rate decreased 0.8 percent in FY 95/96 to $6,079 from the FY 94/95 cost per student rate of $6,126. The high school cost per student rate for FY 96/97 is budgeted to increase 9.8 percent to $6,677. Desegregation Expense In FY 95/96, the district's total de egregation expenses totaled $38,391,254 with $23,396,956 of these costs being eligible for funding from the special funding from the ADE for desegregation. The district received $17,668,136 in desegregation funding from the ADE as stipulated in the Settlement Agreement. In FY 96/97, the district has budgeted $44,989,746 in total desegregation costs with $27,670,103 being eligible for funding from the special desegregation payments made by the ADE. The district should receive approximately $21,413,282 in desegregation funding from the ADE in FY 96/97. All of the information received from the LRSD has been reconciled for accuracy and reliability with no exceptions noted. The district is utilizing the funds received from the ADE in accordance with the Settlement Agreement for desegregation purposes. SOURCES: The Li/lie Rock School i)istrict Fi11a11ce(! ffice, the ADE General Fi11a11ce Section, and the ADJ~ Local Fiscal Services Section. 610 - - LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT TOTAL PROGRAM OPERATING COST FY 96/96 FUNDING SOURCES LOCAL/STATE FEDERAL DESEGREGATION LEA# SCHOOL PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS LEGAL PROGRAM DISTRICT PROGRAM DISTRICT INCENTIVE MAGNET TRANS LEGAL TOTAL 6001001 CENTRAL HIGH 5,015,500 2,073,225 425,834 21,654 0 198,385 32,518 513,062 0 0 179,192 18,9().4 8,478,27'4 6001002 HALL HIGH 3,453,031 1,209,273 248,381 12,630 0 115,714 1,351 299,259 0 0 104,519 11,027 5,455,185 6001003 MANN JR. HIGH 0 1,103,722 226,701 11,528 0 105,614 0 273,139 0 3,351,297 95,396 10,064 5,177,461 6001005 PARKVIEW HIGH 0 1,114,147 228,842 11,637 0 106,612 0 275,718 0 3,699,919 96,298 10,159 5,543,332 6001006 BOOKER ELEM 0 787,070 161,662 8,221 0 75,314 0 194,777 0 2,366,402 68,028 7,177 3,668,651 6001007 DUNBAR JR HIGH 2,172,347 953,866 195,921 9,963 67,947 91,274 199,422 236,054 0 0 82,444 8,698 4,017,936 6001009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 2,527,128 989,049 203,148 10,330 66,188 94,641 103,104 244,761 0 0 85,485 9,019 4,332,853 6001010 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 2,517,134 1,017,718 209,036 10,630 0 97,384 130,593 251,855 0 0 87,963 9,280 4,331,593 6001011 SOUTHWEST JR HIGH 1,863,801 797,494 163,803 8,330 100,765 76,311 177,553 197,356 0 0 68,929 7,272 3,461,614 6001013 HENDERSON JR HIGH 2,828,893 1,032,052 211,980 10,779 92,137 98,756 160,466 255,402 0 0 89,202 9,411 4,789,078 6001017 BALE ELEM 1,102,568 406,566 83,507 4,246 102,347 38,904 131,297 100,613 0 0 3! 140 3,707 2,008,895 6001018 BRADY ELEM 1,043,374 491,267 100,905 5,131 116,845 47,009 87,026 121,574 0 0 4,, 1 4 i() .., N\nO 072 6001020 MCDERMOTT ELEM 1,319,453 634,607 130,347 6,628 78,489 60,725 7,330 157,047 0 0 54,850 ( ( 6001021 CARVER ELEM 0 819,647 168,353 8,561 0 78,431 0 202,838 0 2,109,225 70,843 7,474 6001023 FAIR PARK ELEM 818,134 304,924 62,631 3,185 64,690 29,178 102,117 75,460 0 0 26,355 2,780 6001024 FOREST PARK ELEM 1,059,776 566,846 116,429 5,921 62,082 54,241 29,174 140,278 0 0 48, 4 5,1 9 6001025 FRANKLIN ELEM 0 471,721 96,890 4,927 121,033 45,139 0 116,737 1,928,259 0 40,772 4,301 6001026 GARLAND ELEM 0 308,834 63 434 3,226 32,926 29,552 0 76,427 1,288,699 0 26,693 2,816 6001027 GIBBS ELEM 0 400.050 82 169 4,178 0 38,280 0 99,001 0 1,324,125 34, 77 3,648 6001029 WESTERN HILLS ELEM 874,018 410,475 84,310 4,287 91,578 39,278 12,553 101,580 0 3,743 6001030 JEFFERSON ELEM 1,376,003 652,851 134,094 6,819 AA ?1'17 8 6001033 MEADOWCLIFF ELEM 1,086,027 521,238 107,061 /.. f 4,753 11 6001034 MITCHELL ELEM 0 344,017 70,660 f J 3,137 1,824,00 6001035 ML KING ELEM 83.221 599,424 123,120 5,466 2,831,2 8 6001038 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM 984,174 529,057 108,667 /41 ~ 4,824 ,.~ .o~, 6001039 RIGHTSELL ELEM 0 261,922 53,798 ~ 2,388 1621,2 6001040 ROMINE ELEM 1 090,720 350,533 71,998 /1/. ev-,4' 3,196 1,901,1 6001042 WASHINGTON ELEM 1,839,963 785,767 161,394\n',u 7,165 3,611,70 6001043 WILLIAMS ELEM 0 661,972 135,967 6,036 2,996, 6001044 WILSON ELEM 1,159,297 476,933 97,961 4 349 2,127, 6001045 WOODRUFF ELEM 634,204 284,075 58,348 l 2,590 1 252, 6001047 TERRY ELEM 1,355,220 698,459 143,462 6,369 2,530, 6001048 FULBRIGHT ELEM 1,523,422 675,003 138,644 6,155 2,76. 0?1 6001050 ROCKEFELLER ELEM 0 407,869 83,775 'fl' , 3.719 6001051 BADGETT ELEM 632,756 226,739 46,571 ~~\u0026lt;! 2,068 6001052 BASELINE ELEM 825,709 379,201 77,887 , ~,dts'f-r,v 3,458 6001053 CHICOT ELEM 1,554,714 565,543 116,161\n':) /,V 5,157 15001054 CLOVERDALE ELEM B 982,416 521,238 107,061 ~- 1-~ 4,753 6001055 DAVID O'DODD ELEM 863,240 383,110 78,690 3,493 6001056 GEYER SPRINGS ELEM 817,062 355,745 73,069 M.L -1 3,244 001057 MABEL VALE ELEM 1,178,663 577,271 118.570 5.264 001058 OTTER CREEK ELEM 918,017 441,749 90,734 4,028 0()1059 WAKEFIELD ELEM 1,164,481 559,028 114,823 5,097 0010 WATSON ELEM 1,072,490 532,966 109 470 4,860 ,001 CLOVERDALE JR HIGH 1,780,494 793,585 163,000 7,236 001062 MABEL VALE JR HIGH 1,931,658 639,820 131,417 5,834 001063 JA FAIR HIGH 3,087,463 1,179,301 242.225 10,753 ()01064 MCCLELLAN HIGH 3,401,015 1,177,998 241,957 10,742 IJ/A METRO HIGH 1,499,733 0 0 0 NIA ALT LEARNING CTR 45,536 0 0 0 NIA ISH ELEM 16,354 0 0 0 TOTAL PROGRAM EXPENSE 59,499.209 31,474,967 6,464.867 328,745 3,469,669 3,011,807 5,224 242 7,789,126 7,618,1-45 14,752,306 2,720,432 287,003 See the note s etlon on the next page for explanation, of the e egorlee. URCE The Little Rock School D1.slnct Fmence Office 611 LOCAUSTATE LEA# SCHOOL PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS 6001001 CENTRAL HIGH 5,015,500 2,073,225 425,834 6001002 HALL HIGH 3,453,031 1,209,273 248,381 6001003 MANN JR HIGH 0 1,103,722 226,701 6001005 PARKVIEW HIGH 0 1,114,147 228,842 6001006 BOOKER ELEM 0 787 070 161,662 6001007 DUNBAR JR. HIGH 2,172,347 953,866 195,921 6001009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH 2,527,128 989,049 203,148 6001010 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR HIGH 2,517,134 1,017,718 209,036 6001011 SOUTHWEST JR HIGH 1,863,801 797,494 163,803 6001013 HENDERSON JR HIGH 2,828,893 1,032,052 211,980 6001017 BALE ELEM 1,102,568 406,566 83,507 6001018 BRADY ELEM 1,043,374 491,267 100,905 6001020 MCDERMOTT ELEM 1,319,453 634,607 130,347 6001021 CARVER ELEM 0 819,647 168.353 6001023 FAIR PARK ELEM 818,134 304,924 62,631 6001024 FOREST PARK ELEM 1,059,776 566,846 116,429 6001025 FRANKLIN ELEM 0 471.721 96.890 6001026 GARLAND ELEM 0 308,834 63 434 6001027 GIBBS ELEM 0 400 050 82,169 6001029 WESTERN HILLS ELEM 874,018 410,475 84,310 6001030 JEFFERSON ELEM 1,376,003 652,851 134,094 6001033 MEADOWCLIFF ELEM 1,086,027 521,238 107,061 6001034 MITCHELL ELEM 0 344,017 70,660 6001035 ML KING ELEM 83.221 599,424 123,120 6001038 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM 984,174 529,057 108,667 6001039 RIGHTSELL ELEM 0 261,922 53,798 6001040 ROMINE ELEM 1,090,720 350,533 71,998 6001042 WASHINGTON ELEM 1,839,963 785,767 161,394 6001043 WILLIAMS ELEM 0 661,972 135,967 6001044 WILSON ELEM 1,159,297 476,933 97,961 6001045 WOODRUFF ELEM 634,204 284,075 58,348 6001047 TERRY ELEM 1,355,220 698,459 143,462 6001048 FULBRIGHT ELEM 1,523,422 675,003 138,644 6001050 ROCKEFELLER ELEM 0 407,869 83,775 6001051 BADGETT ELEM 632,756 226,739 46,571 6001052 BASELINE ELEM 825,709 379,201 77,887 6001053 CHICOT ELEM 1,554,714 565,543 116,161 6001054 CLOVERDALE ELEM B 982,416 521,238 107,061 6001055 DAVID 0'0000 ELEM 863,240 383,110 78,690 6001056 GEYER SPRINGS ELEM 817,062 355,745 73,069 ,001057 MABELVALE ELEM 1,178,663 577,271 118,570 {![101058 OTTER CREEK ELEM 918,017 441,749 90,734 Oil1059 WAKEFIELD ELEM 1,164,481 559,028 114,823 O\u0026lt;J1060 WATSON ELEM 1,072,490 532,966 109,470 f.i 01061 CLOVERDALE JR HIGH 1,780,494 793,585 163,000 t,d01062 MABELVALE JR. HIGH 1,931,658 639,820 131,417 001063 JA FAIR HIGH 3,087,463 1,179,301 242,225 -()01064 MCCLELLAN HIGH 3,401,015 1,177,998 241,957 WA METRO HIGH 1,499,733 0 0 NIA ALT LEARNING CTR 45,536 0 0 NIA ISH ELEM 16,354 0 0 TOTAL PROGRAM EXPENSE 59,499,209 31,474,967 6,464,867 See the note section on the next page for explanation of the categories. The Little Rock School District Fmance Office LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT TOTAL PROGRAM OPERATING COST FY 96/96 FUNDING SOURCES FEDERAL DESEGREGATION LEGAL PROGRAM DISTRICT PROGRAM DISTRICT INCENTIVE MAGNET TRANS LEGAL TOTAL 21,654 0 198,385 32,518 513,062 0 0 179,192 18,904 8,478,274 12,630 0 115,714 1,351 299,259 0 0 104,519 11,027 5,455,185 11,528 0 105,614 0 273,139 0 3,351,297 95,396 10,064 5,177,461 11,637 0 106,612 0 275,718 0 3,699,919 96,298 10,159 5,543,332 8,221 0 75,314 0 194,777 0 2,366,402 68,028 7,177 3,668,651 9,963 67,947 91,274 199,422 236,054 0 0 82,444 8,698 4,017,936 10,330 66,188 94,641 103,104 244,761 0 0 85,435 9,019 4,332,853 10,630 0 97,384 130,593 251,855 0 0 87,963 9,280 4,331,593 8,330 100,765 76,311 177,553 197,356 0 0 68,929 7,272 3,461,614 10,779 92,137 98,756 160,466 255,402 0 0 89,202 9,411 4,789,078 4,246 102,347 38,904 131,297 100,613 0 0 35,140 3,707 2,008,895 5,131 116,845 47,009 87,026 121,574 0 0 42,461 4,480 2,060,072 6,628 78,489 60,725 7,330 157,047 0 0 54,850 5,787 2,455,263 8,561 0 78,431 0 202,838 0 2,109,225 70,843 7,474 3,465,372 3,185 64,690 29,178 102,117 75,460 0 0 26,355 2,780 1,489,454 5,921 62,082 54,241 29,174 140,278 0 0 48,994 5,169 2,088,910 4,927 121,033 45,139 0 116,737 1,928,259 0 40,772 4,301 2,829,778 3,226 32,926 29,552 0 76,427 1,288,699 0 26,693 2,816 1,832,607 4,178 0 38,280 0 99,001 0 1,324,125 34,577 3,648 1,986,028 4,287 91,578 39,278 12,553 101,580 0 0 35,478 3,743 1,657,300 6,819 88,207 62,471 30,993 161,561 0 0 56,427 5,953 2,575,37 5,444 112,982 49,877 25,907 128,991 0 0 45,051 4,753 2,087,3 1 3,593 66,158 32,919 0 85,134 1,188,650 0 29,734 3,137 1,824,002 6,261 75,177 57,358 1,688,082 148,340 0 0 51,809 5,466 2,831,2 8 5,526 113,866 50,625 22,659 130,926 0 0 45,727 4,824 1,9h,051 2 736 81,152 25,063 0 64,818 1,106,724 0 22,638 2,388 1,621,2 3,661 68,252 33,542 162,944 86,747 0 0 30,297 3,196 1,901,lio 8,207 154,972 75,189 323,683 194,454 0 0 67,915 7,165 3,611,70 6,914 0 63,343 0 163,819 0 1,901,338 57,215 6,036 2,996,tlli4 4,981 110,803 45,637 68,313 118,027 0 0 41,222 4,349 2,127, i 2,967 62,001 27,183 86,677 70,300 0 0 24,553 2,590 1,252,198 7,295 0 66,835 20,103 172,848 0 0 60,369 6,369 2,530, 0 7,050 91,541 64,590 32,281 167,043 0 0 58,342 6,155 2,764,011 4,260 250,744 39,029 0 100,936 2,105,813 0 35,253 3,719 3,0 ,,  2.368 52,261 21,696 111,973 56,111 0 0 19,597 2,068 1,11 .140 3,961 93,353 36,285 121,121 93,841 0 0 32,775 3,458 1, 7,15 1 5,907 148,894 54,116 99,869 139,955 0 0 48,881 5,157 2,1 @., 7 5,444 113,076 49,877 143,215 128,991 0 0 45,051 4,753 2,101.12:.1 4,001 58,752 36,659 23,078 94,808 0 0 33,113 3,493 1,671.i  3,716 86,941 34,041 110,059 88,036 0 0 30,748 3,244 1,002. e, 6,029 153,101 55,239 86,195 142,858 0 0 49,895 5,264 ~,)1 ,046 4,614 82,949 42,271 19,639 109,320 0 0 38,181 4,028 1,751,602 5,839 111,627 53,493 19,290 138,343 0 0 48,318 5,097 U20, g 5,567 122,465 50,999 146,460 131,893 0 0 46,065 4,860 2,22 ,'.i 5 8,289 90,298 75,937 147,431 196,389 0 0 68,591 7,236 3,J::3111 D 6,683 60,280 61,224 49,866 158,337 0 0 55,301 5,834 3,1co,.t20 12,317 0 112,846 39,300 291,842 0 0 101,929 10,753 \u0026amp;,at7,~75 12,304 0 112,721 77,937 291,520 0 0 101,816 10,742 e.42a,o,o 0 22,790 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,51 .. 0U 0 0 0 392,663 0 0 0 0 0 4 ,, . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18, 6 328,745 3,469,669 3,011,807 5,224,242 7,789,126 7,618,145 14,752,306 2,720,432 287,003 m. ~0.51ij 611 NOTES FOR LRSD TOTAL PROGRAM OPERATING COST SCHEDULE FOR FY 95/96 Funding Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. This category consists of funding for desegregation purposes. Expense Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg Total Category FY 95/96 SOURCE: This category consists of expenses incurred relative to regular program expense, district expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded by unrestricted local, state and federal sources. This category consists of expenses incurred relative to federal program expense and district expense funded by restricted federal sources. This category consists of expenses incurred relative to desegregation program expense, district expense, incentive expense, magnet expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded from desegregation sources. The totals in this column represent the total expense for each school site for fiscal year 1995/1996. The Little Rock School District Finance Office. 612 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CYCLE 1 SCHOOL PROGRAM OPERATING COST FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES LOCAL/STATE FEDERAL DESEGREGATION LEA# SCHOOL PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS LEGAL PROGRAM DISTRICT PROGRAM DISTRICT INCENTIVE MAGNET 6001005 PARKVIEW HIGH 0 1,114,147 228,842 11,637 0 106,612 0 275,718 0 3,699,919 6001023 FAIR PARK ELEM 818,134 304,924 62,631 3,185 0 29,178 102,117 75 460 0 0 6001024 FOREST PARK ELEM 1,059,776 566,846 116,429 5,921 0 M,241 29174 140,278 0 0 6001030 JEFFERSON ELEM 1,376,003 652,851 134,094 6,819 112,982 62,471 30,993 161,561 0 0 6001038 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM 984,174 529,057 108,667 5,526 75,177 50,625 22,659 130,926 0 0 6001044 WILSON ELEM 1,159,297 476.933 97,961 4,981 113,866 45,637 68,313 118,027 0 0 6001047 TERRY ELEM 1,355,220 698,459 143,462 7,295 81,152 66,835 20,103 172,848 0 0 6001052 BASELINE ELEM 825,709 379,201 77,887 3,961 113,076 36,285 121,121 93,841 0 0 6001055 DAVID 0'0000 ELEM 863,240 383,110 78,690 4,001 86,941 36,659 23,078 94,808 0 0 6001063 JA FAIR HIGH 3,087,463 1,179,301 242,225 12,317 153,101 112,846 39,300 291,842 0 0 TOTAL CYCLE 1 PROGRAM EXPENSE 11,529,016 6,284,829 1,290,888 65,643 736,295 601,389 456,858 1,555,309 0 3,699,919 OURCE: The district's Total Program Expense for fiscal year 1995/1996 was $142,640,518. The programs funded In each of the Cycle 1 schools are Indicated on the chart entitled \"Programs In Cycle 1 Schools.\" See note section for Total Program Operating Cost for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories and totals. The Little Rock School District Finance omce. 613 TRANS LEGAL TOTAL 96,298 10,159 5,543,332 26,355 2,780 1,424,764 48,~ 5,169 2,026.828 56,427 5,953 2,600,154 45,727 4,824 1,957,362 41,222 4,349 2,130,586 60,369 6,369 2,612,112 32,775 3,458 1,687,314 33,113 3,493 1,607,133 101,929 10,753 5,231,077 M3,209 57,307 26,820,662 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Programs in Cycle 1 Schools FY 95/96 PARKVIEW FAIR PARK FOREST JEFFERSON PULASKI WILSON TERRY BASELINE DAVID O DODD JA FAIR PROGRAMS HIGH ELEM PARK ELEM ELEM HGTS ELEM ELEM ELEM ELEM ELEM HIGH Four-Year Old X X X Kindergarten X X X X X X X X X X Elementary X X X X X X X X Elementary Music X X X X X X X X Itinerant Instruction X X X X X X X X Resource Room X X X X X X X X X X Special Class X X X Homebound \u0026amp; Hospital X X X X X Gifted \u0026amp; Talented X X X X X X X X Guidance Services X X X X X X X X X X Library Services X X X X X X X X X X High School X '1J -- 'id' / r- 7 Marketing/District Ed-Coop ( Business Ed-Coop Uv~ ,M /fl~ /t 1//2 ~J', Business Ed- Skill Training X Trade \u0026amp; Ind-Coop X ~ (~ ? C ~k~ I\\~ Trade \u0026amp; lnd-Expl X Cons/Homemaking X C mp Ed X - Coord Career-Coop SOURCE: The Uttle Rock School District Finance Offlce. 614 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Programs in Cycle 1 Schools FY 95/96 PARKVIEW FAIR PARK FOREST JEFFERSON PULASKI WILSON TERRY BASELINE DAVID O DODD JA FAIR PROGRAMS HIGH ELEM PARK ELEM ELEM HGTS ELEM ELEM ELEM ELEM ELEM HIGH Four-Year Old X X X Kindergarten X X X X X X X X X X Elementary X X X X X X X X Elementary Music X X X X X X X X Itinerant Instruction X X X X X X X X Resource Room X X X X X X X X X X Special Class X X X Homebound \u0026amp; Hospital X X X X X Gifted \u0026amp; Talented X X X X X X X X Guidance Services X X X X X X X X X X Library Services X X X X X X X X X X High School X X Marketing/District Ed-Coop X Business Ed-Coop I X Business Ed- Skill Training X )( Trade \u0026amp; Ind-Coop X X I Trade \u0026amp; lnd-Expl X X cons/Homemaking X X I Comp Ed X X Coord Career-Coop X . - SOURCE: The Uttle Rock School District Finance Offlce. 614 - - - - LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DIST fCT COST PER STUDENT FOR TOTAL PROGRAMS FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL\u0026amp; COST PER STU LEA# SCHOOL @ 10101195 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL FY 95196 6001001 CENTRAL HIGH 1,591 7,536,213 198,385 743,676 8,478,274 5,329 6001002 HALL HIGH 928 4,923,315 115,714 416,156 5,455,185 5,878 6001003 MANN JR. HIGH 847 1,341,951 105,614 3,729,896 5,177,461 6,113 6001005 PARKVIEW HIGH 855 1,354,626 106,612 4,082,094 5,543,332 6,483 6001006 BOOKER ELEM 604 956,953 75,314 2,636,384 3,668,651 6,074 6001007 DUNBAR JR. HIGH 732 3,332,097 159,221 526,618 4,017,936 5,489 6001009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIG 759 3,729,655 160,829 442,369 4,332,853 5,709 6001010 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR. HIG 781 3,754,518 97,384 479,691 4,331,593 5,546 6001011 SOUTHWEST JR. HIGH 612 2,833,428 177,076 451,110 3,461,614 5,656 6001013 HENDERSON JR. HIGH 792 4,083,704 190,893 514,481 4,789,078 6,047 6001017 BALE ELEM 312 1,596,887 141,251 270,757 2,008,895 6,439 6001018 BRADY ELEM 377 1,640,677 163,854 255,541 2,060,072 5,464 6001020 MCDERMOTT ELEM 487 2,091,035 139,214 225,014 2,455,263 5,042 6001021 CARVER ELEM 629 996,561 78,431 2,390,380 3,465,372 5,509 6001023 FAIR PARK ELEM 234 1,188,874 93,868 206,712 1,489,454 6,365 6001024 FOREST PARK ELEM 435 1,748,972 116,323 223,615 2,088,910 4,802 6001025 FRANKLIN ELEM 362 573,538 166,172 2,090,069 2,829,779 7,817 6001026 GARLAND ELEM 237 375,494 62,478 1,394,635 1,832,607 7,733 6001027 GIBBS ELEM 307 486,397 38,280 1,461,351 1,986,028 6,469 6001029 WESTERN HILLS ELEM 315 1,373,090 ,2-0,856 153,354 1,657,300 5,261 6001030 JEFFERSON ELEM 501 2,169,767 150,678 254,934 2,575,379 5,140 6001033 MEAOOWCLIFF ELEM 400 1,719,770 162,859 204,702 2,087,331 5,218 6001034 MITCHELL ELEM 264 418,270 99,077 1,306,655 1,824,002 6,909 6001035 ML KING ELEM 460 812,026 132,535 1,893,697 2,838,258 6,170 6001038 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM 406 1,627,424 164,491 204,136 1,996,051 4,916 6001039 RIGHTSELL ELEM 201 318,456 106,215 1,196,568 1,621,239 8,066 6001040 ROMINE ELEM 269 1,516,912 101,794 283,184 1,901,890 7,070 6001042 WASHINGTON ELEM 603 2,795,331 230,161 593,217 3,618,709 6,001 6001043 WILLIAMS ELEM 508 804,853 63,343 2,128,408 2,996,604 5,899 6001044 WILSON ELEM 366 1,739,172 156,440 231,911 2,127,523 5,813 6001045 WOODRUFF ELEM 218 979,594 89,184 184,120 1,252,898 5,747 6001047 TERRY ELEM 536 2,204,436 66,835 259,689 2,530,960 4,722 6001048 FULBRIGHT ELEM 518 2,344,119 156,131 263,821 2,764,071 5,336 6001050 ROCKEFELLER ELEM 313 495,904 289,773 2,245,721 3,031,398 9,685 6001051 BADGETT ELEM 174 908,434 73,957 189,749 1,172,140 6,736 6001052 BASELINE ELEM 291 1,286,758 129,638 251,195 1,667,591 5,731 6001053 CHICOT ELEM 434 2,242,325 203,010 293,862 2,739,197 6,312 6001054 CLOVERDALE ELEM 400 1,616,159 162,953 322,010 2,101,122 5,253 6001055 DAVID 0'0000 ELEM 294 1,329,041 95,411 154,492 1,578,944 5,371 6001056 GEYER SPRINGS ELEM 273 1,249,592 120,982 232,087 1,602,661 5,871 6001057 MABELVALE ELEM 443 1,880,533 208,340 284,212 2,373,085 5,357 6001058 OTTER CREEK ELEM 339 1,455,114 125,220 171,168 1,751,502 5,167 6001059 WAKEFIELD ELEM 429 1,844,171 165,120 211,048 2,220,339 5,176 6001060 WATSON ELEM 409 1,720,493 173,464 329,278 2,223,235 5,436 6001061 CLOVERDALE JR HIGH 609 2,745,368 166,235 419,647 3,331,250 5,470 6001062 MABELVALE JR. HIGH 491 2,709,578 121,504 269,338 3,100,420 6,315 6001063 JA FAIR HIGH 905 4,521,306 112,846 443,824 5,077,976 5,611 6001064 MCCLELLAN HIGH 904 4,833,274 112,721 482,015 5,428,010 6,004 NIA METRO HIGH NIA 1,499,733 22,790 0 1,522,523 NIA NIA ALT LEARNING CTR NIA 45,536 0 392,663 438,199 NIA NIA ISH ELEM NIA 16,354 0 0 16,354 NIA TOTAL EXPENSE 24,154 97,767,788 6,481,476 38,391,254 142,640,518 5,905 See the note section on the next page for explanations of the categories. SOURCES. The Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 615 NOTES FOR LRSD COST PER STUDENT FOR TOTAL PROGRAMS FOR FY 95/96 Funding Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. This category consists of funding for desegregation purposes. Expense Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg Total Category FY 95196 This category consists of expenses incurred relative to regular program expense funded by unrestricted local, state and federal sources. This category consists of expenses funded by restricted federal sources. This category consists of expenses incurred relative to desegregation programs funded from desegregation sources. The totals in this column represent the total expense for each school site for fiscal year 1995/1996. Cost Per Student Category FY 95196 SOURCES: The cost per student figures were calculated by dividing the school's total expense for fiscal year 1995/1996 by their enrollment as of October 1, 1995. The Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 616 LEA# 6001005 6001023 6001024 6001030 6001038 6001044 6001047 6001052 6001055 6001063 SOURCES:  LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR CYCLE 1 SCHOOL PROGRAMS FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; SCHOOL @ 10/01/95 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL PARKVIEW HIGH 855 1,354,626 106,612 4,082,094 5,543,332 FAIR PARK ELEM 234 1,188,874 93,868 206,712 1,489,454 FOREST PARK ELEM 435 1,748,972 116,323 223,615 2,088,910 JEFFERSON ELEM 501 2,169,767 150,678 254,934 2,575,379 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM 406 1,627,424 164,491 204,136 1,996,051 WILSON ELEM 366 1,739,172 156,440 231,911 2,127,523 TERRY ELEM 536 2,204,436 66,835 259,689 2,530,960 BASELINE ELEM 291 1,286,758 129,638 251,195 1,667,591 DAVID O'DODD ELEM 294 1,329,041 95,411 154,492 1,578,944 JA FAIR HIGH 905 4,521,306 112,846 443,824 5,077,976 TOTAL EXPENSE 4,823 19,170,376 1,193,142 6,312,602 26,676,120 See note section for Cost Per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 617 COST PER STU FY 95/96 6,483 6,365 4,802 5,140 4,916 5,813 4,722 5,731 5,371 5,611 5,531 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT BY PROGRAM FY 95/96 PERCENT AVG COST DISTRICT VARIANCE PROGRAM OF PER STUDENT AVG COST OVER DIST AVG/ SCHOOL PROGRAM COST TOTAL COST BY PROGRAM PER STUDENT (UNDER DIST AVG) ELEMENTARY PROGRAMS 78,593,013 55.1% 5,888 5,905 (17) JR. HIGH PROGRAMS 32,542,205 22.8% 5,787 5,905 (118) HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAMS 31,505,300 22.1% 6,079 5,905 174 LRSD PROGRAM COST FY 95/96 LRSD COST PER STU FY 95/96 80000000 60000000 40000000 20000000 0 PROGRAM COST PERCENT OF TOTAL COST AVG COST PER STUDENT BY PROGRAM 6100 6000 5900 5800 5700 5600 Program costs consist of the total cost for FY 95/96 for the indicated category of school programs. The percentage of program cost to the total district cost of $142,640,518 for FY 95/96. The total program cost for FY 95/96 to the total number of students in the program category. DISTRICT AVG COST PER STU The total cost for FY 95/96 of $142,640,518 to the total enrollment at October 1, 1995 of 24,154. VARIANCE SOURCE: The difference between the cost per student by program and the district average cost per student. A positivev ariance indicates the cost per student by program is greater than the district cost per student, and a negative variance indicates the cost per student by program is less than the district cost per student. The Little Rock School District Finance Office. 618 LEA# 6001006 6001017 6001018 6001020 6001021 6001023 6001024 6001025 6001026 6001027 6001029 6001030 6001033 6001034 6001035 6001038 6001039 6001040 6001042 6001043 6001044 6001045 6001047 6001048 6001050 6001051 6001052 6001053 6001054 6001055 6001056 6001057 6001058 6001059 6001060 N/A N/A SOURCES LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR ELEMENTARY PROGRAMS FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; SCHOOL @ 10/01/95 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL BOOKER ELEM 604 956,953 75,314 2,636,384 3,668,651 BALE ELEM 312 1,596,887 141,251 270,757 2,008,895 BRADY ELEM 377 1,640,677 163,854 255,541 2,060,072 MCDERMOTT ELEM 487 2,091,035 139,214 225,014 2,455,263 CARVER ELEM 629 996,561 78,431 2,390,380 3,465,372 J t {\u0026lt;?v (!. d ? lJ ,~ i a,tf~ (i)QA'r~ p(lJ MABELVALI::: t:Lt:M 'l'I..) 1,oou,-\nJ\"\" .UO,.J'iV LU ... ,L IL L1VIV1\"\"\"'\"\"'\"\"\" OTTER CREEK ELEM 339 1,455,114 125,220 171,168 1,751,502 WAKEFIELD ELEM 429 1,844,171 165,120 211,048 2,220,339 WATSON ELEM 409 1,720,493 173,464 329,278 2,223,235 ALT LEARNING CTR N/A 45,536 0 392,663 438,199 ISH ELEM NIA 16,354 0 0 16,354 TOTAL EXPENSE 13,348 48,569,022 4,633,652 25,390,339 78,593,013 See note section for Cost Per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The Little Rock School D1stnct Finance Office and the Local Fiscal SeNices Division of the ADE. 619 COST PER STU FY 95/96 6,074 6,439 5,464 5,042 5,509 6,365 4,802 7,817 7,733 6,469 5,261 5,140 5,218 6,909 6,170 4,916 8,066 7,070 6,001 5,899 5,813 5,747 4,722 5,336 9,685 6,736 5,731 6,312 5,253 5,371 5,871 5,357 5,167 5,176 5,436 NIA NIA 5,888 LEA# 6001006 6001017 6001018 6001020 6001021 6001023 6001024 6001025 6001026 6001027 6001029 6001030 6001033 6001034 6001035 6001038 6001039 6001040 6001042 6001043 6001044 6001045 6001047 6001048 6001050 6001051 6001052 6001053 6001054 6001055 6001056 6001057 6001058 6001059 6001060 NIA NIA SOURCES: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR ELEMENTARY PROGRAMS FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; SCHOOL @ 10/01/95 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL BOOKER ELEM 604 956,953 75,314 2,636,384 3,668,651 BALE ELEM 312 1,596,887 141,251 270,757 2,008,895 BRADY ELEM 377 1,640,677 163,854 255,541 2,060,072 MCDERMOTT ELEM 487 2,091,035 139,214 225,014 2,455,263 CARVER ELEM 629 996,561 78,431 2,390,380 3,465,372 FAIR PARK ELEM 234 1,188,874 93,868 206,712 1,489,454 FOREST PARK ELEM 435 1,748,972 116,323 223,615 2,088,910 FRANKLIN ELEM 362 573,538 166,172 2,090,069 2,829,779 GARLAND ELEM 237 375,494 62,478 1,394,635 1,832,607 GIBBS ELEM 307 486,397 38,280 1,461,351 1,986,028 WESTERN HILLS ELEM 315 1,373,090 130,856 153,354 1,657,300 JEFFERSON ELEM 501 2,169,767 150,678 254,934 2,575,379 MEADOWCLIFF ELEM 400 1,719,770 162,859 204,702 2,087,331 MITCHELL ELEM 264 418,270 99,077 1,306,655 1,824,002 ML KING ELEM 460 812,026 132,535 1,893,697 2,838,258 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM 406 1,627,424 164,491 204,136 1,996,051 RIGHTSELL ELEM 201 318,456 106,215 1,196,568 1,621,239 ROMINE ELEM 269 1,516,912 101,794 283,184 1,901,890 WASHINGTON ELEM 603 2,795,331 230,161 593,217 3,618,709 WILLIAMS ELEM 508 804,853 63,343 2,128,408 2,996,604 WILSON ELEM 366 1,739,172 ~56,440 231,911 2,127,523 WOODRUFF ELEM 218 979,594 89,184 184,120 1,252,898 TERRY ELEM 536 2,204,436 66,835 259,689 2,530,960 FULBRIGHT ELEM 518 2,344,119 156,131 263,821 2,764,071 ROCKEFELLER ELEM 313 495,904 289,773 2,245,721 3,031,398 BADGETT ELEM 174 908,434 73,957 189,749 1,172,140 BASELINE ELEM 291 1,286,758 129,638 251,195 1,667,591 CHICOT ELEM 434 2,242,325 203,010 293,862 2,739,197 CLOVERDALE ELEM 400 1,616,159 162,953 322,010 2,101,122 DAVID O'DODD ELEM 294 1,329,041 95,411 154,492 1,578,944 GEYER SPRINGS ELEM 273 1,249,592 120,982 232,087 1,602,661 MABELVALE ELEM 443 1,880,533 208,340 284,212 2,373,085 OTTER CREEK ELEM 339 1,455,114 125,220 171,168 1,751,502 WAKEFIELD ELEM 429 1,844,171 165,120 211,048 2,220,339 WATSON ELEM 409 1,720,493 173,464 329,278 2,223,235 ALT LEARNING CTR NIA 45,536 0 392,663 438,199 ISH ELEM NIA 16,354 0 0 16,354 TOTAL EXPENSE 13,348 48,569,022 4,633,652 25,390,339 78,593,013 See note section for Cost Per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 619 COST PER STU FY 95/96 6,074 6,439 5,464 5,042 5,509 6,365 4,802 7,817 7,733 6,469 5,261 5,140 5,218 6,909 6,170 4,916 8,066 7,070 6,001 5,899 5,813 5,747 4,722 5,336 9,685 6,736 5,731 6,312 5,253 5,371 5,871 5,357 5,167 5,176 5,436 NIA N/A 5,888 I I LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR JR HIGH PROGRAMS FY 95/96 I FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; COST PER STU LEA# SCHOOL @ 10/01/95 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL 6001003 MANN JR. HIGH 847 1,341,951 105,614 3,729,896 5,177,461 6001007 DUNBAR JR. HIGH 732 3,332,097 159,221 526,618 4,017,936 6001009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 759 3,729,655 160,829 442,369 4,332,853 6001010 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 781 3,754,518 97,384 479,691 4,331,593 6001011 SOUTHWEST JR. HIGH 612 2,833,428 177,076 451,110 3,461,614 6001013 HENDERSON JR. HIGH 792 4,083,704 190,893 514,481 4,789,078 6001061 CLOVERDALE JR. HIGH 609 2,745,368 166,235 419,647 3,331,250 6001062 MABELVALE JR. HIGH 491 2,709,578 121,504 269,338 3,100,420 TOTAL EXPENSE I 5,623 I 24,530,299 1,178,756 6,833,150 32,542,205 SOURCES See note section for Cost Per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. w The Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal SeNices D,vision of the ADE. 620 FY 95/96 6,113 5,489 5,709 5,546 5,656 6,047 5,470 6,315 5,787 LEA# 6001001 6001002 6001005 6001063 6001064 N/A I SOURCES: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAMS FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; COST PER STU SCHOOL @ 10/01/95 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL CENTRAL HIGH 1,591 7,536,213 198,385 743,676 8,478,274 HALL HIGH 928 4,923,315 115,714 416,156 5,455,185 PARKVIEW HIGH 855 1,354,626 106,612 4,082,094 5,543,332 JA FAIR HIGH 905 4,521,306 112,846 443,824 5,077,976 MCCLELLAN HIGH 904 4,833,274 112,721 482,015 5,428,010 METRO HIGH N/A 1,499,733 22,790 0 1,522,523 TOT AL EXPENSE I 5,183 I 24,668,467 669,068 6,167,765 31,505,300 See note section for Cost Per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 621 FY 95/96 5,329 5,878 6,483 5,611 6,004 N/A 6,079 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CYCLE 1 SCHOOL TEACHER \u0026amp; ADMINISTRATOR EXPENSE LEA# 6001005 6001023 6001024 6001030 6001038 6001044 6001047 6001052 6001055 6001063 FY 95/96 TEACHER ADMINISTRATOR SCHOOL SALARIES SALARIES PARKVlEW HIGH 2,229,182 224,797 FAIR PARK ELEM 625,035 50,210 FOREST PARK ELEM 732,541 57,412 JEFFERSON ELEM 981,331 100,441 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM 706,709 48,690 WILSON ELEM 870,632 46,181 TERRY ELEM 919,575 91,081 BASELINE ELEM 573,244 56,824 DAVID O'DODD ELEM 597,053 53,392 JA FAIR HIGH 2,135,807 200,309 TOTAL I 10,371,109 I 929,337 Total district expense for teacher and school site administrator salaries for FY 95/96 was $62,739,208 or 44.0 percent of total expense for FY 95/96 of $142,640,518. Teacher Expense FY 95196 Teacher salary expense for each Cycle 1 school for FY 95/96. Administrator Expense I FY 95/96 Administrator salary expense for each Cycle 1 school for FY 95/96. Total Category TOTAL 2,453,979 675,245 789,953 1,081,772 755,399 916,813 1,010,656 630,068 650,445 2,336,116 11,300,446 FY 95/96 The totals in this column represent the total teacher and administrator expense for each Cycle 1 school for FY 95/96. SOURCE: The Little Rock School District Finance Office. 622 LRSD PROGRAM COST FY 96/97 623 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT TOTAL PROGRAM OPERATING BUDGET FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES LOCAL/STATE FEDERAL DESEGREGATION LEA# SCHOOL PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS LEGAL PROGRAM DISTRICT PROGRAM DISTRICT MAGNET INCENTIVE 6001001 CENTRAL HIGH 5,746,846 2,410,490 441,679 16,121 0 301,537 52,464 693,236 0 0 6001002 HALL HIGH 3,782,965 1,116,395 204,559 7,466 0 139,654 0 321,066 0 0 6001003 MANN JR HIGH 0 1,158,446 212,264 7,747 0 144,914 0 333,159 3,808,689 0 6001005 PARKVIEW HIGH 0 1,192,358 218,478 7,974 0 149.157 0 342,912 4,357,849 0 6001006 BOOKER ELEM 0 817,966 149,676 5,470 0 102,323 0 235,240 2,814,752 0 6001007 DUNBAR JR. HIGH 2,532,629 1,051 263 192,629 7,031 7.697 131,509 197,727 302,340 0 0 6001009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH 2,656,647 854,591 156.569 5,715 31,153 106,904 196.760 245,773 0 0 6001010 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR HIGH 2,780,669 1,064,648 195,114 7,122 0 133,206 106,931 306,241 0 0 6001011 SOUTHWEST JR HIGH 2,132,228 805,758 147,641 5,369 37,239 100,795 195,660 231,729 0 0 6001013 HENDERSON JR HIGH 3,141,993 1,005,162 184,176 6,722 40,678 125,740 146,196 269,076 0 0 6001017 BALE ELEM 1,154,155 459,652 64,260 3,075 46,765 57,525 153,835 132,249 0 0 6001018 BRADY ELEM 1,177,507 478,642 67,739 3,202 44,553 59,900 104,058 137,711 0 0 6001020 MCDERMOTT ELEM 1,519,141 663,326 121,543 4,436 39,207 82,978 22193 190 767 0 0 6001021 CARVER ELEM 0 819,322 150,126 5,480 0 102,492 0 235,630 2,530,286 0 6001023 FAIR PARK ELEM 692,636 297,072 54,433 1.967 37,074 37 162 93,101 65.435 0 0 6001024 FOREST PARK ELEM 1,311,562 609 066 111,600 4,073 35,454 76,190 33.391 175,162 0 0 6001025 FRANKLIN ELEM 0 515.466 94,450 3,447 67,199 64,482 0 148 744 n 2,240,116 6001026 GARLAND ELEM ,.7 1,462,591 6001027 GIBBS ELEM C /lJ 0 6001029 WESTERN HILLS ELEM 1 i I l. ~ 0 6001030 JEFFERSON ELEM 1 ? 0 6001033 MEADOWCLIFF ELEM 1 ( y ~ 0 6001034 MITCHELL ELEM 1 6/1 q 1,359,797 6001035 Ml KING ELEM 0 6001038 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM 1 ? ( 0 6001039 RIGHTSELL ELEM 1,268,129 6001040 ROMINE ELEM 1 [) ,-sr v,~c\u0026gt;-8 uJpf ~~~ 0 60010-42 WASHINGTON ELEM 2 ~ 0 6001043 WILLIAMS ELEM ~.IJ.5 0 6001044 WILSON ELEM 1 ~ll/4J 0 6001045 WOODRUFF ELEM t u//~ atf-~ (.,~ 0 60010-47 TERRY ELEM 1 .::rc:_v ~ vt.. 0 6001048 FULBRIGHT ELEM 1 0 6001050 ROCKEFELLER ELEM Ir- b 4,sj/~ 2,268,277 6001051 BADGETT ELEM P-A-~ 0 6001052 BASELINE ELEM ! 0 6001053 CHICOT ELEM 1 0 6001054 CLOVERDALE ELEM 1 0 6001055 DAVID 0'0000 ELEM ! 0 6001056 GEYER SPRINGS ELEM I 0 6001057 MABELVALE ELEM 1 0 6001058 OTTER CREEK ELEM 1 0 6001059 WAKEFIELD ELEM 1 0 6001060 WATSON ELEM 1 0 6001061 CLOVERDALE JR HIGH 2 0 6001062 MABELVALE JR HIGH 2 0 6001063 JA FAIR HIGH 3 0 6001064 MCCLELLAN HIGH 3 0 NIA METRO HIGH 1 0 NIA ALT LEAR ING CTR 0 NIA ISH ELEM 0 I I I I I I I I I TOTAL PROGRAM BUDGET 67.909,531 32,688.201 6,026,174 I 219,950 3 053 330 4 114,111 6 449 163 9.458 364 17,361,466 6,636,910 SOURCE The district for the first qu rter of FY 96197 has Incurred expenses totaling $20,609,842 or 13.0 percent of their total FY 96/97 budget SH the note section on the next p~ fOf explMatlons of the categorles. The L11tieR ock School Dlsr-,ct Fmncs Otrics 624 TRANS LEGAL TOTAL 211,583 14,296 9,868,252 97,993 6,621 5,676,719 101,684 6,870 5,773,773 104,660 7,072 6,380,460 71,796 4,651 4,202,278 92,277 6,235 4,521,557 75,013 5,068 4,336,213 93,468 6,315 4,693,934 70,726 4,779 3,731,964 88,229 5,961 5,033,937 40,364 2,727 2,134,807 42,031 2,840 2,138,383 58,224 3,934 2,705,749 71,917 4.659 3,920,112 26,076 1,762 1,526,936 53,461 3,612 2,413,571 45,246 3,057 3,201,709 30,838 2.064 2,319,983 37.149 2,510 2,329,406 37,149 2,510 1,646,664 59,177 3,996 2,913,975 44,412 3,001 2,176,438 29,052 1.963 1,962,999 65,606 4,433 3,5'45,301 54,057 3.652 2,951.243 27,147 1,634 1,629,177 31,910 2156 2,006,699 78,108 5,277 '4,352,552 59 653 4,031 3,391 227 40,959 2,767 2,292.837 27,624 1,866 1,490,285 61,320 '4,143 2,662,664 59,534 4.023 3,053.611 40,126 2,711 3 244,681 22,385 1,513 1,364.681 31,672 2,1-40 1,781,263 57,391 3678 3,163,966 55,247 3,733 2,567,957 26614 1,947 1,536.063 32,624 2 204 1,641,207 47,746 3 226 2,395,192 36,911 2,494 1,663,233 51,913 3.508 2,695,605 52,747 3.564 2,509,642 76 064 5141 3,825,461 55,724 3,765 3,376,-474 96.707 6,669 5,337,989 110,257 7,450 6,111,923 0 0 1,552,508 0 0 606,256 0 0 1-4,50() 2,686.793 195,050 159.201,0 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT TOTAL PROGRAM OPERATING BUDGET FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES LOCAL/STATE FEDERAL LEA# SCHOOL PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS LEGAL PROGRAM DISTRICT PROGRAM DISTRICT 6001001 CENTRAL HIGH 5,746,846 2,410,490 441,679 16,121 0 301,537 I 52,464 693,236 6001002 HALL HIGH 3,782 965 1116,395 204,559 7,466 0 139,654 0 321,066 6001003 MANN JR HIGH 0 1,158,446 212,264 7,747 0 144.914 0 333,159 6001005 PARKV1EW HIGH 0 1192,358 218,478 7 974 0 149 157 0 342,912 6001006 BOOKER ELEM 0 817 966 149,878 5,470 0 102 323 0 235,240 6001007 DUNBAR JR HIGH 2,532,629 1,051 283 192,629 7,031 7,897 131,509 197,727 302,340 6001009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH 2,656,647 854,591 156.589 5,715 31,153 106,904 198 760 245,773 6001010 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR HIGH 2,780,689 1,064,848 195,114 7,122 0 133,206 106,931 306,241 6001011 SOUTHWEST JR HIGH 2,132,228 805.758 147,641 5,389 37,239 100,795 195,680 231,729 6001013 HENDERSON JR HIGH 3,141,993 1 005,162 184,178 6.722 40,678 125,740 146,198 289,076 6001017 BALE ELEM 1,154,155 459,852 84,260 3,075 46,765 57,525 153,835 132,249 6001018 BRADY ELEM 1,177,507 478,842 87,739 3,202 44,553 59,900 104,058 137,711 6001020 MCDERMOTT ELEM 1,519,141 663,326 121,543 4,436 39,207 82,978 22,193 190,767 6001021 CARVER ELEM 0 819,322 150,126 5,480 0 102,492 0 235,630 6001023 FAIR PARK ELEM 892,836 297 072 54,433 1,987 37,074 37162 93,101 85,435 6001024 FOREST PARK ELEM 1,311,562 609.066 111,600 4,073 35,454 76,190 33,391 175,162 6001025 FRANKLIN ELEM 0 515,468 94,450 3,447 87 199 64,482 0 146,244 6001026 GARLAND ELEM 0 351,332 64,375 2,350 241,424 43,949 0 101,040 6001027 GIBBS ELEM 0 423.226 77,549 2,830 0 52,943 0 121.716 6001029 WESTERN HILLS ELEM 1,073,033 423,226 77,549 2.631 32,041 52,943 23,866 121,716 6001030 JEFFERSON ELEM 1,653,192 674 176 123,531 4,509 62,376 64.335 34,791 193,888 6001033 MEADOWCLIFF ELEM 1,215,474 505,972 92,710 3,364 69.707 63,294 32,971 145,513 6001034 MITCHELL ELEM 0 330,985 60,647 2,214 41,749 41,404 0 95,166 6001035 ML KING ELEM 62,245 747,426 136 953 4,999 38,876 93 499 2,176,308 214.954 6001038 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM 1,280,926 615,648 112,843 4 119 599,206 77039 26.436 177,113 6001039 RIGHTSELL ELEM 0 309,261 56,670 2,066 36,412 36,689 0 66,947 6001040 ROMINE ELEM 1,203,291 363,540 66,612 2,431  0,940 45,477 147,791 104,551 6001042 WASHINGTON ELEM 2,298,859 889.660 163,051 5,951 157 794 111,316 386,420 255,916 6001043 WILLIAMS ELEM 0 679,604 124,525 4,545 0 65,014 0 195,446 6001044 WILSON ELEM 1,352,091 466,634 85,502 3,121 65,397 56,373 63.793 134 200 6001045 WOODRUFF ELEM 803,753 314,707 57,664 2,105 39,643 39,366 112,646 90,507 6001047 TERRY ELEM 1,638,552 696,595 126,005 4,672 0 67,390 39,277 200,910 6001048 FULBRIGHT ELEM 1,829,125 678,247 124,277 4,536 37,170 64,645 36,996 195,058 6001050 ROCKEFELLER ELEM 0 457,139 63,762 3,057 161 155 57.165 0 131.469 6001051 BADGETT ELEM 763,464 255,021 46,726 1 706 44,509 31 902 124 291 73,342 6001052 BASELINE ELEM 962,347 360,627 66,115 2,413 66,103 45.137 140,736 103,771 6001053 CHICOT ELEM 1,801,817 653,830 119,803 4,373 78,989 81,790 174,079 188,036 6001054 CLOVERDALE ELEM 1,264,299 629,413 115,329 4,209 67,313 78,736 166,664 181,014 6001055 DAVID O'DODD ELEM 925,551 328,272 60,150 2 195 10,779 41,065 42,667 94,408 6001056 GEYER SPRINGS ELEM 840,977 371,679 68,104 2.486 40,156 46,495 129,590 106,892 6001057 MABELVALE ELEM 1,260,295 543,954 99,670 3.638 109,698 68,045 102,483 156,437 6001058 OTTER CREEK ELEM 1,089,943 420,513 77,052 2,612 37,492 52,604 22,476 120,936 6001059 WAKEFIELD ELEM 1,335,727 591,431 108,369 3,955 327 778 73,984 28 649 170,091 6001060 WATSON ELEM 1,299,044 600,927 110,109 4,019 38,867 75,172 152,372 172,821 6001061 CLOVERDALE JR HIGH 2,072,506 866,800 158,826 5,797 62,759 108,431 219,833 249,284 6001062 MABELVALE JR HIGH 2,235,568 634,839 116,323 4,246 20,670 79,415 45,350 182,574 6001063 JA FAIR HIGH 3,383,370 1,124,534 206,051 7,521 0 140,672 47,059 323,406 6001064 MCCLELLAN HIGH 3,868,990 1,256,114 230,160 8,401 0 157,132 112,171 361,248 NIA METRO HIGH 1,475,600 0 0 0 76.908 0 0 0 NIA ALT LEARNING CTR 75,772 0 0 0 0 0 532,484 0 NIA ISH ELEM 14,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOT AL PROGRAM BUDGET 67,909,531 32,888,201 6,026,174 219,950 3,053,330 4,114,111 6,449,163 9,456,364 The district for the first quarter of FY 96197 has Incurred expenses totaling $20,609,842 or 13.0 percent of their total FY 96/97 budget. SOURCE SH th not section on th next page for explanations of th clllegones. The Little Roel\u0026lt; School District Financi, Otrlci, 624 DESEGREGATION MAGNET INCENTIVE TRANS LEGAL TOTAL 0 0 211,583 14.296 9,888,252 0 0 97,993 6,621 5,676,719 3,808,689 0 101,684 6,870 5,773,773 4,357,849 0 104,660 7,072 6,330,460 2,814,752 0 71.798 4.851 4,202,278 0 0 92,277 6,235 4,521,557 0 0 75,013 5,068 4,336,213 0 0 93,468 6,315 4,693,934 0 0 70,726 4,779 3,731,964 0 0 88,229 5,961 5,033,937 0 0 40,364 2,727 2,134,807 0 0 42,031 2,840 2,138,383 0 0 58,224 3,934 2,705,749 2,530,286 0 71,917 4,859 3,920,112 0 0 26,076 1,762 1,526,938 0 0 53,461 3,612 2,413,571 0 2,240,116 45,246 3,057 3,201,709 0 1,482,591 30,836 2.084 2,319,983 1,611,483 0 37,149 2,510 2,329,406 0 0 37,149 2,510 1,846,864 0 0 59,177 3,996 2,913,975 0 0 44,412 3,001 2,176,438 0 1,359,797 29,052 1,963 1,962,999 0 0 65,606 4,433 3,545,301 0 0 54,057 3,652 2,951,243 0 1,268,129 27,147 1,834 1,829,177 0 0 31,910 2,156 2,008,699 0 0 78,106 5,277 4,352,552 2,236,407 0 59,653 4,031 3,391.227 0 0 40,959 2,767 2,292,637 0 0 27,624 1,666 1,490,265 0 0 61,320 4,143 2,662,664 0 0 59,534 4.023 3,053,811 0 2,288,277 40,126 2.711 3,244,881 0 0 22,385 1,513 1,364,881 0 0 31,672 2,140 1,781,263 0 0 57,391 3,878 3,163,966 0 0 55,247 3,733 2,567,957 0 0 28,814 1,947 1,536,068 0 0 32,624 2,204 1,641,207 0 0 47,746 3,226 2,395,192 0 0 36,911 2,494 1,863,233 0 0 51,913 3,508 2,695,605 0 0 52,747 3,564 2,509,642 0 0 76,084 5,141 3,825,461 0 0 55,724 3,765 3,378,474 0 0 98,707 6,669 5,337,989 0 0 110,257 7,450 6,111,923 0 0 0 0 1,552,508 0 0 0 0 608,25\u0026amp; 0 0 0 0 14,50Q 17,361,466 8,638,910 2,886,793 195,050 159,201,0 J NOTES FOR LRSD TOTAL PROGRAM OPERA TING BUDGET SCHEDULE FOR FY 96/97 Funding Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. This category consists of funding for desegregation purposes. Expense Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg Total Category FY 96/97 SOURCE: This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to regular program expense, district expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded by unrestricted local, state and federal sources. This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to federal program expense and district expense funded by restricted federal sources. This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to desegregation program expense, district expense, magnet expense, incentive expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded from desegregation sources. The totals in this column represent the total budget for each school site for fiscal year 1996/1997. The Little Rock School District Finance Office. 625 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CYCLE 1 SCHOOL PROGRAM OPERATING BUDGET FY 96/97 - FUNDING SOURCES LOCAUSTATE FEDERAL DESEGREGATION LEA# SCHOOL PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS LEGAL PROGRAM DISTRICT PROGRAM DISTRICT MAGNET INCENTIVE 6001005 PARKVIEW HIGH 0 1,192,358 218,478 7,974 0 1  9,157 0 342,912 4,357,849 0 6001023 FAIR PARK ELEM 892,836 297,072 54,433 1,987 37,074 37,162 93,101 85,435 0 0 6001024 FOREST PARK ELEM 1,311,562 609,066 111,600 4,073 35,454 76,190 33,391 175,162 0 0 6001030 JEFFERSON ELEM 1,653,192 674,178 123,531 4,509 82,376 84,335 34,791 193,888 0 0 6001038 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM 1,280,928 615,848 112,843 4,119 599,206 77,039 26,438 177,113 0 0 6001044 WILSON ELEM 1,352,091 466,634 85,502 3,121 65,397 58,373 83,793 134,200 0 0 6001047 TERRY ELEM 1,638,552 698,595 128,005 4,672 0 87,390 39,277 200,910 0 0 6001052 BASELINE ELEM 962,347 360,827 66,115 2,413 66,103 45,137 140,738 103,771 0 0 6001055 DAVID 0'0000 ELEM 925,551 328,272 60,150 2,195 10,779 41,065 42,887 94,408 0 0 6001063 JA FAIR HIGH 3,383,370 1,124,534 206,051 7,521 0 140,672 47,059 323,406 0 0 TOTAL CYCLE 1 PROGRAM BUDGET 13,400,429 6,367,384 1,166,708 42,584 896,389 796,520 541,475 1,831,205 4,357,849 0 The district's Total Program Budget for the fiscal year 96/97 ls $159,201,043. The programs funded In each of the Cycle 1 schools are Indicated on the chart entitled \"Programs In Cycle 1 Schools.\" See note section for Total Program Operating Budget for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories and totals. The Little Rock School District Finance omce. 626 TRANS LEGAL TOTAL 104,660 7,072 6,380,460 26,076 1,762 1,526,938 53,461 3,612 2,413,571 59,177 3,998 2,913,975 54,057 3,652 2,951,243 40,959 2,767 2,292,837 61,320 4,143 2,862,864 31,672 2,140 1,781,263 28,814 1,947 1,536,068 98,707 6,669 5,337,989 558,903 37,762 29,997,208 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Programs in Cycle 1 Schools FY96/97 PARKVIEW FAIR PARK FOREST JEFFERSON PULASKI WILSON TERRY BASELINE DAVIDO DODD JA FAIR PROGRAMS HIGH ELEM PARK ELEM ELEM HGTS ELEM ELEM ELEM ELEM ELEM HIGH Four-Year Old X X X Kindergarten X X X X X X X X X X Elementary X X X X X X X X Elementary Music X X X X X X X X Itinerant Instruction X X X X X X X X Resource Room X X X X X X X X X X Special Class X X X Homebound \u0026amp; Hospital X X X X X Gifted \u0026amp; Talented X X X X X X X X Guidance Services X X X X X X X X X X Library Services X X X X X X X X X X High School X X Marketing/District Ed-Coop X Business Ed-Coop X Business Ed- Skill Training X X Trade \u0026amp; Ind-Coop X X Trade \u0026amp; lnd-Expl X X Cons/Homemaking X X Comp Ed X X Coord Career-Coop X SOURCE: The Little Rock School District Finance Office. 627 LEAt 6001001 6001002 6001003 6001005 6001006 6001007 6001009 6001010 6001011 6001013 6001017 6001018 6001020 6001021 6001023 6001024 6001025 6001026 6001027 6001029 6001030 6001033 6001034 6001035 6001038 6001039 6001040 6001042 6001043 6001044 6001045 6001047 6001048 6001050 6001051 6001052 6001053 6001054 6001055 6001056 6001057 6001058 6001059 6001060 6001061 6001062 6001063 6001064 NIA NIA NIA SOURCE: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR TOTAL PROGRAMS FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; SCHOOL @ 10/01/96 STATE FEDERAL OESEG TOTAL CENTRAL HIGH 1,777 8,615,136 301,537 971,579 9,888,252 HALL HIGH 823 5,111,385 139,654 425,680 5,676,719 MANN JR. HIGH 854 1,378,457 144,914 4,250,402 5,n3,n3 PARKVIEW HIGH 879 1,418,810 149,157 4,812,493 6,380,460 BOOKER ELEM 603 973,314 102,323 3,126,641 4,202,278 DUNBAR JR. HIGH ns 3,783,572 139,406 598,579 4,521,557 FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 630 3,673,542 138,057 524,614 4,336,213 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 785 4,047,773 133,206 512,955 4,693,934 SOUTHWEST JR. HIGH 594 3,091,016 138,034 502,914 3,731,964 HENDERSON JR. HIGH 741 4,338,055 166,418 529,464 5,033,937 BALE ELEM 339 1,701,342 104,290 329,175 2,134,807 BRADY ELEM 353 1,747,290 104,453 286,640 2,138,383 MCDERMOTT ELEM 489 2,308,446 122,185 275,118 2,705,749 CARVER ELEM 604 974,928 102,492 2,842,692 3,920,112 FAIR PARK ELEM 219 1,246,328 74,236 206,374 1,526,938 FOREST PARK ELEM 449 2,036,301 111,644 265,626 2,413,571 FRANKLIN ELEM 380 613,365 151,681 2,436,663 3,201,709 GARLAND ELEM 259 418,057 285,373 1,616,553 2,319,983 GIBBS ELEM 312 503,605 52,943 1,n2,858 2,329,406 WESTERN HILLS ELEM 312 1,576,639 84,984 185,241 1,846,864 JEFFERSON ELEM 497 2,455,410 166,711 291,854 2,913,975 MEAOOWCLIFF ELEM 373 1,817,540 133,001 225,897 2,176,438 MITCHELL ELEM 244 393,846 83,153 1,486,000 1,962,999 ML KING ELEM 551 951,625 132,375 2,461,301 3,545,301 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM 454 2,013,738 676,245 261,260 2,951,243 RIGHTSELL ELEM 228 368,019 75,101 1,386,057 1,829,177 ROMINE ELEM 268 1,635,874 86,417 286,408 2,008,699 WASHINGTON ELEM 656 3,357,721 269.110 725,721 4,352,552 WILLIAMS ELEM 501 808,674 85,014 2,497,539 3,391,227 WILSON ELEM 344 1,907,348 123,770 261,719 2,292,837 WOODRUFF ELEM 232 1,178,229 79,211 232,845 1,490,285 TERRY ELEM 515 2,469,824 87,390 305,650 2,862,864 FULBRIGHT ELEM 500 2,636,185 122,015 295,611 3,053,811 ROCKEFELLER ELEM 337 543,958 238,340 2,462,583 3,244,881 BADGETT ELEM 188 1,066,939 76,411 221,531 1,364,881 BASELINE ELEM 266 1,391,702 111,240 278,321 1,781,263 CHICOT ELEM 482 2,579,823 160,779 423,384 3,163,986 CLOVERDALE ELEM 464 2,013,250 146,049 408,658 2,567,957 DAVID 0'0000 ELEM 242 1,316,168 51,844 168,056 1,536,068 GEYER SPRINGS ELEM 274 1,283,246 86,651 271,310 1,641,207 MABELVALE ELEM 401 1,907,557 177,743 309,892 2,395,192 OTTER CREEK ELEM 310 1,590,320 90,096 182,817 1,863,233 WAKEFIELD ELEM 436 2,039,482 401,762 254,361 2,695,605 WATSON ELEM 443 2,014,099 114,039 381,504 2,509,642 CLOVERDALE JR. HIGH 639 3,103,929 171,190 550,342 3,825,461 MABELVALE JR. HIGH 468 2,990,976 100,085 287,413 3,378,474 JA FAIR HIGH 829 4,721,476 140,672 475,841 5,337,989 MCCLELLAN HIGH 926 5,363,665 157,132 591,126 6,111,923 METRO HIGH NIA 1,475,600 76,908 0 1,552,508 ALT LEARNING CTR NIA 75,772 0 532,484 608,256 ISH ELEM NIA 14,500 0 0 14,500 TOTAL BUDGET 24,245 107,043,856 7,167,441 44,989,746 159,201,043 The district for the first quarter of FY 96/97 has incurred expenses totaling $20,609,842 or 13.0 percent of their total FY 96/97 budget. See the note section on the next page for explanations of the categories. The Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 628 COST PER STU FY 96/97 5,565 6,898 6,761 7,259 6,969 5,834 6,883 5,980 6,283 6,793 6,297 6,058 5,533 6,490 6,972 5,375 8,426 8,957 7,466 5,919 5,863 5,835 8,045 6,434 6,501 8,023 7,495 6,635 6,769 6,665 6,424 5,559 6,108 9,629  7,260 6,696 6,564 5,534 6,347 5,990 5,973 6,010 6,183 5,665 5,987 7,219 6,439 6,600 N/A NIA NIA 6,566 NOTES FOR LRSD COST PER STUDENT FOR TOTAL PROGRAMS FOR FY 96/97 Funding Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. This category consists of funding for desegregation purposes. Expense Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg Total Category FY96/97 This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to regular programs funded by unrestricted local, state and federal sources. This category consists of budgeted expenses funded by restricted federal sources. This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to desegregation programs funded from desegregation sources. The totals in this column represent the total budget for each school site for fiscal year 1996/1997. Cost Per Student Category FY 96/97 SOURCE: The cost per student figures were calculated by dividing the school's total budget for FY 96/97 by their enrollment as of October 1, 1996. The Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 629 LEA# 6001005 6001023 6001024 6001030 6001038 6001044 6001047 6001052 6001055 6001063 I SOURCE: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR CYCLE 1 SCHOOL PROGRAMS FY 96/97 I FUNDING SOURCES II I ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; [\nJ SCHOOL @ 10/01/96 STATE FEDERAL DESEG PARKVIEW HIGH 879 1,418,810 149,157 4,812,493 6,380,460 FAIR PARK ELEM 219 1,246,328 74,236 206,374 1,526,938 FOREST PARK ELEM 449 2,036,301 111,644 265,626 2,413,571 JEFFERSON ELEM 497 2,455,410 166,711 291,854 2,913,975 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM 454 2,013,738 676,245 261,260 2,951,243 WILSON ELEM 344 1,907,348 123,770 261,719 2,292,837 TERRY ELEM 515 2,469,824 87,390 305,650 2,862,864 BASELINE ELEM 266 1,391,702 111,240 278,321 1,781,263 DAVID 0'0000 ELEM 242 1,316,168 51,844 168,056 1,536,068 JA FAIR HIGH 829 4,721,476 140,672 475,841 5,337,989 TOT AL BUDGET I 4,694 I 20,977,105 1,692,909 7,327,194 29,997,208 See note section for Cost per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 630 COST PER STU FY 96/97 7,259 6,972 5,375 5,863 6,501 6,665 5,559 6,696 6,347 6,439 6,391 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT BY PROGRAM FY 96/97 PERCENT AVG COST DISTRICT VARIANCE PROGRAM OF PER STUDENT AVG COST OVER DIST AVG/ SCHOOL PROGRAM BUDGET TOTAL BUDGET BY PROGRAM PER STUDENT (UNDER DIST AVG) ELEMENTARY PROGRAMS 88,957,879 55.9% 6,577 6,566 11 JR. HIGH PROGRAMS 35,295,313 22.1% 6,434 6,566 (133) HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAMS 34,947,851 22.0% 6,677 6,566 111 LRSD PROGRAM COST LRSD COST PER STUDENT 100000000 80000000 60000000 40000000 20000000 0 PROGRAM COST FY 96/97 PERCENT OF TOTAL COST AVG COST PER STUDENT BY PROGRAM 6700 6600 6500 6400 6300 FY 96/97 Program costs consist of the total budget for FY 00/97 for the indicated category of school programs The percentage of program budget to the total district budget of $159,201,043 for FY 00/97. The total program budget for FY 00/97 to the total number of students in the program category as of October 1 , 1996 DISTRICT AVG COST PER STU The total budget for FY 96/97 of $159,201,043 to the total enrollment at October 1, 1900 of 24,245. VARIANCE SOURCE: The difference between the cost per student by program and the district average cost per student. A positive variance indicates the cost per student by program is greater than the district cost per student, and a negative variance indicates the cost per student by program is less than the district cost per student. The Little Rock School Oistnct Finance Office. 631 LEA# 6001006 6001017 6001018 6001020 6001021 6001023 6001024 6001025 6001026 6001027 6001029 6001030 6001033 6001034 6001035 6001038 6001039 6001040 6001042 6001043 6001044 6001045 6001047 6001048 6001050 6001051 6001052 6001053 6001054 6001055 6001056 6001057 6001058 6001059 6001060 NIA NIA SOURCE: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR ELEMENTARY PROGRAMS FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; SCHOOL @ 10101196 STATE FEDERAL DESEG BOOKER ELEM 603 973,314 102,323 3,126,641 BALE ELEM 339 1,701,342 104 290 329,175 BRADY ELEM 353 1,747,290 104,453 286 640 MCDERMOTT ELEM 489 2,308 446 122,185 275,118 CARVER ELEM 604 974,928 102,492 2,842,692 FAIR PARK ELEM 219 1 246,328 74,236 206,374 FOREST PARK ELEM 449 2,036,301 111,644 265,626 FRANKLIN ELEM 380 613,365 151,681 2,436,663 GARLAND ELEM 259 418,057 285,373 1,616,553 GIBBS ELEM 312 503,605 52,943 1,772,858 WESTERN HILLS ELEM 312 1,576,639 84,984 185,241 JEFFERSON ELEM 497 2,455,410 166,711 291,854 MEAOOWCLIFF ELEM 373 1,817 540 133,001 225,897 MITCHELL ELEM 244 393,846 83,153 1,486,000 ML KING ELEM 551 951,625 132,375 2,461,301 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM 454 2,013 738 676,245 261,260 RIGHTSELL ELEM 228 368,019 75,101 1,386,057 ROMINE ELEM 268 1,635,874 86,417 286,408 WASHINGTON ELEM 656 3,357,721 269,110 725,721 WILLIAMS ELEM 501 808,674 85,014 2,497,539 WILSON ELEM 344 1,907,348 123,770 261,719 WOODRUFF ELEM 232 1,178,229 79,211 232,845 TERRY ELEM 515 2,469,824 87,390 305,650 FULBRIGHT ELEM 500 2,636,185 122,015 295,611 ROCKEFELLER ELEM 337 543,958 238,340 2,462,583 BADGETT ELEM 188 1,066,939 76,411 221,531 BASELINE ELEM 266 1,391,702 111,240 278,321 CHICOT ELEM 482 2,579,823 160,779 423,384 CLOVERDALE ELEM 464 2,013,250 146,049 408,658 DAVID 0'0000 ELEM 242 1,316,168 51,844 168,056 GEYER SPRINGS ELEM 274 1,283,246 86,651 271,310 MABELVALE ELEM 401 1,907,557 177,743 309,892 OTTER CREEK ELEM 310 1,590,320 90,096 182,817 WAKEFIELD ELEM 436 2,039,482 401,762 254,361 WATSON ELEM 443 2,014,099 114,039 381,504 ALT LEARNING CTR NIA 75,772 0 532,484 ISH ELEM N/A 14,500 0 0 TOTAL BUDGET 13,525 53,930,464 5,071,071 29,956,344 See note section for Cost per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. TOTAL 4,202,278 2,134,807 2,138 383 2,705,749 3,920,112 1,526,938 2,413,571 3,201,709 2,319,983 2,329,406 1,846,864 2,913,975 2,176,438 1,962,999 3,545,301 2,951 243 1,829,177 2,008,699 4,352,552 3,391,227 2,292,837 1,490,285 2,862,864 3,053,811 3,244,881 1,364,881 1,781,263 3,163,986 2,567,957 1,536,068 1,641,207 2,395,192 1,863,233 2,695,605 2,509,642 608,256 14,500 88,957,879 The Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 632 COST PER STU FY 96/97 6,969 6,297 6,058 5,533 6,490 6,972 5,375 8,426 8,957 7,466 5,919 5,863 5,835 8,045 6,434 6,501 8,023 7,495 6,635 6,769 6,665 6,424 5,559 6,108 9,629 7,260 6,696 6,564 5,534 6,347 5,990 5,973 6,010 6,183 5,665 NIA NIA 6,577 LEA# 6001003 6001007 6001009 6001010 6001011 6001013 6001061 6001062 I SOURCE: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR JR HIGH PROGRAMS FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; SCHOOL @ 10/01/96 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL MANN JR. HIGH 854 1,378,457 144,914 4,250,402 5,773,773 DUNBAR JR. HIGH 775 3,783,572 139,406 598,579 4,521,557 FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 630 3,673,542 138,057 524,614 4,336,213 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 785 4,047,773 133,206 512,955 4,693,934 SOUTHWEST JR. HIGH 594 3,091,016 138,034 502,914 3,731,964 HENDERSON JR. HIGH 741 4,338,055 166,418 529,464 5,033,937 CLOVERDALE JR. HIGH 639 3,103,929 171,190 550,342 3,825,461 MABELVALE JR. HIGH 468 2,990,976 100,085 287,413 3,378,474 TOTAL BUDGET I 5,486 I 26,407,320 1,131,310 7,756,683 35,295,313 See note section for Cost per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 633 COST PER STU FY 96/97 6,761 5,834 6,883 5,980 6,283 6,793 5,987 7,219 I 6,434 I LEA# 6001001 6001002 6001005 6001063 6001064 N/A I SOURCE: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAMS FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; SCHOOL @ 10/01/96 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL CENTRAL HIGH 1,777 8,615,136 301,537 971,579 9,888,252 HALL HIGH 823 5,111,385 139,654 425,680 5,676,719 PARKVIEW HIGH 879 1,418,810 149,157 4,812,493 6,380,460 JA FAIR HIGH 829 4,721,476 140,672 475,841 5,337,989 MCCLELLAN HIGH 926 5,363,665 157,132 591,126 6,111,923 METRO HIGH N/A 1,475,600 76,908 0 1,552,508 TOTAL BUDGET I 5,234 I 26,706,072 965,060 7,276,719 34,947,851 See note section for Cost per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 634 COST PER STU FY 96/97 5,565 6,898 7,259 6,439 6,600 N/A - 6,677 I   LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CYCLE 1 SCHOOL TEACHER \u0026amp; ADMINISTRATOR BUDGET FY 96/97 LEA# SCHOOL TEACHER SALARIES ADMINISTRATOR SALARIES 6001005 PARKVIEW HIGH 2,283,538 228,084 6001023 FAIR PARK ELEM 552,475 50,108 6001024 FOREST PARK ELEM 811,654 59,778 6001030 JEFFERSON ELEM 1,026,676 104,844 6001038 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM 773,251 50,841 6001044 WILSON ELEM 888,517 45,990 6001047 TERRY ELEM 982,833 96,083 6001052 BASELINE ELEM 568,672 59,163 6001055 DAVID O'DODD ELEM 543,994 53,307 6001063 JAFAIR HIGH 2,076,618 192,889 TOTAL BUDGET 10,508,228 941,087 Teacher Budget FY 96197 The district's total teacher and school site administrator salary expense for the first quarter of FY 96/97 totaled $6,655,050 or 32.3 percent of the district's total expense for the same time period of $20,609,842. Total district expense for teacher and school site administrator salaries for FY 96/97 is budgeted at $65,272,421 or 41.0 percent of the total budget for FY 96/97 of $159,201,043. Teacher salary budget for each Cycle 1 school for FY 96/97. Administrator Budget TOTAL 2,511,622 602,583 871,432 1,131,520 824,092 934,507 1,078,916 627,835 597,301 2,269,507 11,449,315 FY 96197 School site administrator salary budget for each Cycle 1 school for FY 96/97. Total Category FY 96197 SOURCE: The totals in this column represent the total teacher and administrator budget for each Cycle 1 school for fiscal year 1996/1997. The Little Rock School District Finance Office. 635 NLRSD PROGRAM COST FY 95/96 636    F . BUDGET INFORMATION 1. Cost of operating all elementary programs, junior high school programs, and high school programs by funding source (local/regular state/federal and special state desegregation funding). North Little Rock School District (NLRSD) The following is a summary of the NLRSD Program Cost Section of the February 1, 1997 Monitoring Report. Total program expense for the district is separated by funding source and expense category within the funding source. Total program expense is actual for FY 95/96 and budgeted for FY 96/97. Separate schedules indicate the total program expense for the Cycle 1 schools. The programs funded by the Cycle 1 schools are also included. Teacher expense and school administrator expense are also presented for the Cycle 1 schools. Cost per student information is presented for the: district~ elementary school programs~ junior high school programs~ high school programs\nand Cycle 1 school programs. Total Operating Expenses The district's total operating expenses for FY 95/96 were $45,497,622 or an increase of3.6 percent over FY 94/95 expenses of$43,93 l,450. The district's total operating expenses for FY 96/97 are budgeted at $53,883,330 which is an increase of 18. 4 percent. Elementary school operating costs rose from $22,125,861 in FY 94/95 to $24,007,591 in FY 95/96. Operating co ts for elementary chool are budgeted to rise an additional $4,219,077 in FY 96/97 to $2 ,226,66 . Operating cost for junior high chools increa ed from 7,512, 0 in FY 94/95 to $7,690,795 in FY 95/96. The junior high chool op rating co. t for FY 96/97 is budgeted to increa e 21.3 percent to $9,330,107. Operating co ts for high school decrea d from $14,292,709 in FY 94/95 to $ I 3,799,236 in FY 95/96.  The co t for operating high chool are budg ted to increa e 18.3 p rcent in FY 96/97 to $16,326,555 OUR E The North Li Ille Rock School District Finance O[fice, the ADJ~' General Finance Section, and the ADE Local Fiscal Serwces Sectwn. 637    F . BUDGET INFORMATION (Continued) 1. Cost of operating all elementary programs, junior high chool programs, and high school programs by funding source (local/regular state/federal and special state desegregation funding). (Continued) North Little Rock School District ( LRSD) (Continued) Enrollment Total district enrollment as of October 1, 1995 declined by 155 students or 1. 7 percent in FY 95/96 for a total enrollment of 8,802 as compared with total enrollment as of October 1, 1994 of8,957. Total enrollment for FY 96/97 increased to 8,966 as of October 1, 1996. Enrollment in the district's elementary schools decreased from 4,807 as of October 1, 1994 to 4,789 or 0.4 percent in FY 95/96 as of October 1, 1995. Elementary school enrollment decreased in FY 96/97 to 4,773 as of October l, 1996. Junior high school enrollment declined by 27 students from 1,479 in FY 94/95 to I 452 or 1.8 percent in FY 95/96. Junior high school enrollment in FY 96/97 increased as of October 1, 1996 to 1,476 . Enrollment in the district's high schools declined in FY 95/96 from 2,671 as of October 1, 1994 to 2,561 or 4.1 percent as of October I, 1995. High school enrollment increased in FY 96/97 to 2, 717 as of October 1, 1996. Cost per Student Rate The district's cost per student rate increased from $4,905 in FY 94/95 to $5,169 in FY 95/96 resulting in an overall cost per student increase of 5 .4 percent. The cost per student rate is budgeted to increase 16.3 percent in FY 96/97 to $6,010. The elementary cost per student rate increased in FY 95/96 from $4,603 in FY 94/95 to $5,013 or 8.9 percent in FY 95/96. The elementary cost per student rate is budgeted to increase an additional 18.0 percent in FY 96/97 to $5,914. The junior high cost per student rate increased 4.3 percent in FY 95/96 from $5,080 in FY 94/95 to $5,297 in FY 95/96. The junior high cost per student rate is budgeted to increase to $6,321 in FY 96/97. SOURCES: The North Li/tie Rock School District Finance CHfice, the ADE General Fi11a11ce Sec\ntio,1, and the ADE Local Fiscal Services Section 638    F . BUDGET INFORMATION (Continued) 1. Cost of operating all elementary programs, junior high school programs, and high school programs by funding source (local/regular state/federal and special state desegregation funding). (Continued) North Little Rock School District (NLRSD) (Continued) Cost per Student Rate (Continued) The high school cost per student rate increased from $5,351 in FY 94/95 to $5,388 in FY 95/96. The high school cost per student rate is budgeted to increase an additional 11.5 percent in FY 96/97 to $6,009. Desegregation Expense The district's desegregation costs for FY 95/96 were $2,124,324. The district received desegregation funding from the ADE in FY 95/96 as stipulated in the Settlement Agreement totaling $1,556,119. The district has budgeted $1,603,938 in total desegregation expen e for FY 96/97. The district should receive approximately $1,785,092 in FY 96/97 in desegregation funding from the ADE. Of the amount expected to be received by the di trict in FY 96/97, only $1,488,072 of the total amount relates to expenses for FY 96/97 because the district was reimbursed $297,020 in FY 96/97 for desegregation transportation expense incurred from FY 9 l /92 through FY 95/96. All of the information received from the LR D has been reconciled for accuracy and reliability with no exception noted. The di trict i utilizing the funds received from the ADE in accordance with the ettlement Agreement for de egregation purpo es 0 RCES The North Uttle Rock School District Finance (~[fice, the ADE General Finance . ~ection, and the Al lj Local Fis al Ser\\1/ces Section. 639 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT TOTAL PROGRAM OPERATING COST FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES LOCAUSTATE FEDERAL LEA# SCHOOL PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS LEGAL PROGRAM DISTRICT 6002050 AMBOY ELEMENT ARY 1,173,309 491,365 63,047 1,096 98,758 59,468 6002053 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY 492,610 141,029 18,095 315 18,525 17,068 6002054 BOONE PARK ELEM 1,142,858 480,172 61,610 1,071 233,131 58,114 6002055 CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY 694,330 271,985 34,898 607 18,179 32,918 6002056 GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY 682,952 233,930 30,015 522 62,208 28,312 6002057 INDIAN HILLS ELEMENTARY 1,245,767 427,566 54,861 954 130,893 51,747 6002058 LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY 555,118 250,719 32,170 559 86,188 30,344 6002059 CENTRAL ELEMENTARY 1,248,444 451,070 57,876 1,006 158,962 54,592 6002060 LYNCH DRIVE ELEM 1,133,696 486,888 62,472 1,086 149,869 58,926 6002061 MEADOW PARK ELEM 646,017 254,077 32,600 567 74,625 30,750 6002063 N. HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 1,066,474 445,474 57,158 994 104,452 53,914 6002064 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY 684,568 322,353 41,361 719 77,647 39,013 6002065 PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY 1,103,469 387,271 49,690 864 58,166 46,870 6002067 REDWOOD ELEMENTARY 785,594 249,600 32,026 557 117,011 30,208 6002069 SEVENTH STREET ELEM 1,070,799 421,969 54,142 942 103,698 51,070 6002070 LAKEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL 1,723,479 542,852 69,653 1,211 2,719 65,700 6002072 RIOGEROAD MIDDLE SCHOOL 1,876,488 674,927 86,599 1,506 48,903 81,684 6002075 NLR HIGH SCHOOL-EAST 4,485,842 1,452,828 186,411 3,241 53,588 175,831 6002076 NLR HIGH SCHOOL-WEST 4,436,039 1,413,653 181,384 3,154 117,359 171,090 6002077 ROSE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL 1,609,191 407,419 52,275 909 105,647 49,309 6002078 BARING CROSS CENTER 347,538 44,771 5,745 100 82,916 5,419 N/A SECONDARY ALTERNATIVE 411,646 0 0 0 51,707 0 N/A ELEMENT ARY ALTERNATIVE 451,405 0 0 0 20,181 0 TOTAL PROGRAM EXPENSE 29,067,633 9,851,918 1,264,088 21,980 1,975,332 1,192,347 OURCE: See the note section on the next page for explanations of the categories. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office. 640 DESEGREGATION PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS LEGAL TOTAL 66,150 11,611 15,039 4,906 1,984,749 28,085 3,333 4,317 1,408 724,785 65,288 11,347 14,697 4,794 2,073,082 42,479 6,427 8,325 2,716 1,112,864 50,475 5,528 7,160 2,336 1,103,438 60,320 10,104 13,087 4,269 1,999,568 39,915 5,925 7,674 2,503 1,011,115 62,855 10,659 13,806 4,504 2,063,774 69,349 11,506 14,902 4,861 1,993,555 40,605 6,004 1,m 2,537 1,095,559 61,311 10,527 13,635 4,448 1,818,387 48,013 7,617 9,866 3,218 1,234,375 72,041 9,152 11,853 3,867 1,74 ,243 37,453 5,898 7,640 2,492 1,2 a,479 59,868 9,972 12,915 4,213 1,78 ,!588 62,183 12,828 16,615 5,420 2,60 ,660 77,128 15,949 20,658 6,739 2,8 0, 61 180,712 34,332 44,467 14,506 6,631,758 229,025 33,406 43,268 14,114 6,tkl, 02 46,638 9,628 12,470 4,068 2,2Q7,554 5,094 1,058 1,370 447 494, M 61,633 0 0 0 624, a 24,986 0 0 0 S , r2 1,491,606 232,811 301,541 98,366 4S,'191,b22 NOTES FOR NLRSD TOTAL PROGRAM OPERATING COST SCHEDULE FOR FY 95/96 Funding Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg Expense Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg Total Category FY 95/96 SOURCE: This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. This category consists of funding for desegregation purposes. This category consists of expenses incurred relative to regular program expense, district expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded by unrestricted local, state and federal sources. This category consists of expenses incurred relative to federal program expense and district expense funded by restricted federal sources. This category consists of expenses incurred relative to desegregation program expense, district expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded from desegregation sources. The totals in this column represent the total expense for each school site for fiscal year 1995/1996. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office. 641 LEA# SCHOOL 6002053 BELWOOD ELEMENT ARY 6002054 BOONE PARK ELEM 6002056 GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY 6002063 N. HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 6002064 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY 6002065 PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY 6002067 REDWOOD ELEMENTARY TOTAL CYCLE 1 PROGRAM EXPENSE NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CYCLE 1 SCHOOL PROGRAM OPERATING COST FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES LOCAUSTATE FEDERAL PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS LEGAL PROGRAM DISTRICT PROGRAM 492,610 141,029 18,095 315 18,525 17,068 28,085 1,142,658 480,172 61,610 1,071 233,131 58,114 65,268 682,952 233,930 30,015 522 62,208 28,312 50,475 1,066,474 445,474 57,158 994 104,452 53,914 61,311 684,566 322,353 41,361 719 77,647 39,013 48,013 1,103,469 387,271 49,690 664 58,166 46,670 72,041 785,594 249,600 32,026 557 117,011 30,206 37,453 5,958,525 2,259,629 289,955 5,042 671,140 273,499 362,666 The district's Total Program Expense for the fiscal year was $45,497,622. The programs funded in each of the Cycle 1 schools are indicated on the chart entitled \"Programs in Cycle 1 Schools.\" DESEGREGATION DISTRICT TRANS 3,333 4,317 11,347 14,697 5,528 7,160 10,527 13,635 7,617 9,866 9,152 11,853 5,898 7,640 53,402 69,168 See the note section for Total Program Operating Cost for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories and totals. SOURCE: The North Little Rock School District Finance Office. 642 LEGAL TOTAL 1,408 724,785 4,794 2,073,082 2,336 1,103,438 4,448 1,818,387 3,218 1,234,375 3,867 1,743,243 2,492 1,268,479 22,563 9,9 }89 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Programs in Cycle 1 Schools FY 95/96 BELWOOD BOONE PARK GLENVIEW N. HEIGHTS PARK HILL PIKE VIEW REDWOOD PROGRAMS ELEM ELEM ELEM ELEM ELEM ELEM ELEM Four-Year Old X X Kindergarten X X X X X X X Elementary X X X X X X X Elementary Music X X X X X X X Itinerant Instruction X X X X X X X Resource Room X X X X X X X Special Class X X X X X Homebound \u0026amp; Hospital X X X X X X X Gifted \u0026amp; Talented X X X X X X X Guidance Services X X X X X X X Library Services X X X X X X X SOURCE: The North Little Rock School District Finance Office. 643 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHO DrSTRfCT COST PER STUDENT FOR TOTAL PROGRAMS FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL\u0026amp; LEAi SCHOOL @ 10/01/95 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL 6002050 AMBOY ELEMENTARY 439 1,728,817 158,226 97,706 1,984,749 6002053 BELWOOD ELEMENT ARY 126 652,049 35,593 37,143 724,785 6002054 BOONE PARK ELEM 429 1,685,711 291,245 96,126 2,073,082 6002055 CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY 243 1 ,001 ,820 51,097 59,947 1,112,864 6002056 GLENVIEW ELEMENT ARY 209 947,419 90,520 65,499 1,103,438 6002057 INDIAN HILLS ELEMENT ARY 382 1,729,148 182,640 87,780 1,999,568 6002058 LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY 224 838,566 116,532 56,017 1,011,115 6002059 CENTRAL ELEMENT ARY 403 1,758,396 213,554 91,824 2,063,774 6002060 LYNCH ORNE ELEM 435 1,684,142 208,795 100,618 1,993,555 6002061 MEAOOW PARK ELEM 227 933,261 105,375 56,923 1,095,559 6002063 N. HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 398 1,570,100 158,366 89,921 1,818,387 6002064 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY 288 1,049,001 116,660 68,714 1,234,375 6002065 PIKE VIEW ELEMENT ARY 346 1,541,294 105,036 96,913 1,743,243 6002067 REDWOOD ELEMENTARY 223 1,067,777 147,219 53,483 1,268,479 6002069 SEVENTH STREET ELEM 377 1,547,852 154,768 86,968 1,789,588 6002070 LAKEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL 485 2,337,195 68,419 97,046 2,502,660 6002072 RIDGEROAD MIDDLE SCHOOL 603 2,639,520 130,587 120,474 2,890,581 6002075 NLR HIGH SCHOOL-EAST 1,298 6,128,322 229,419 274,017 6,631,758 6002076 NLR HIGH SCHOOL-WEST 1,263 6,034,230 288,449 319,813 6,642,492 6002077 ROSE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL 364 2,069,794 154,956 72,804 2,297,554 6002078 BARING CROSS CENTER 40 398,154 88,335 7,969 494,458 N/A SECONDARY ALTERNATIVE NIA 411,646 51,707 61,633 524,986 N/A ELEMENTARY ALTERNATIVE NIA 451,405 20,181 24,986 496,572 TOTAL EXPENSE 8,802 40,205,619 3,167,679 2,124,324 45,497,622 Funding Categories Local \u0026amp; State This category includes funding from 104 Federal This category includes funding from re Deseg This category consists of funding for dE Expense Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal l~( - ,')JC/v 5 l ~ 1'tJJol es. \u0026lt;.. Deseg Total Category FY 95'96 This category consists of expenses inc This category consists of expenses fun This category consists of expenses inc1 The totals in this column represent the Cost Per Student Category FY95'96 SOURCES: The cost per student figures were calc1.. October 1, 1995. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 644 COST PER STU FY 95196 4,521 5,752 4,832 4,580 5,280 5,234 4,514 5,121 4,583 4,826 4,569 4,286 5,038 5,688 4,747 5,160 4,794 5,109 5,259 6,312 12,361 NIA NIA 5,169 - NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DrSTRrcr COST PER STUDENT FOR TOTAL PROGRAMS FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL\u0026amp; COST PER STU LEAi SCHOOL @ 10/01/95 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL FY 95/96 6002050 AMBOY ELEMENTARY 439 1,728,817 158,226 97,706 1,984,749 4,521 6002053 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY 126 652,049 35,593 37,143 724,785 5,752 6002054 BOONE PARK ELEM 429 1,685,711 291,245 96,126 2,073,082 4,832 6002055 CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY 243 1,001 ,820 51,097 59,947 1,112,864 4,580 6002056 GLENVIEW ELEMENT ARY 209 947,419 90,520 65,499 1,103,438 5,280 6002057 INDIAN HILLS ELEMENT ARY 382 1,729,148 182,640 87,780 1,999,568 5,234 6002058 LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY 224 838,566 116,532 56,017 1,011,115 4,514 6002059 CENTRAL ELEMENTARY 403 1,758,396 213,554 91,824 2,063,774 5,121 6002060 LYNCH DRIVE ELEM 435 1,684,142 208,795 100,618 1,993,555 4,583 6002061 MEADOW PARK ELEM 227 933,261 105,375 56,923 1,095,559 4,826 6002063 N. HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 398 1,570,100 158,366 89,921 1,818,387 4,569 6002064 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY 288 1,049,001 116,660 68,714 1,234,375 4,286 6002065 PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY 346 1,541,294 105,036 96,913 1,743,243 5,038 6002067 REDWOOD ELEMENT ARY 223 1,067,777 147,219 53,483 1,268,479 5,688 6002069 SEVENTH STREET ELEM 377 1,547,852 154,768 86,968 1,789,588 4,747 6002070 LAKEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL 485 2,337,195 68,419 97,046 2,502,660 5,160 6002072 RIDGEROAD MIDDLE SCHOOL 603 2,639,520 130,587 120,474 2,890,581 4,794 6002075 NLR HIGH SCHOOL-EAST 1,298 6,128,322 229,419 274,017 6,631,758 5,109 6002076 NLR HIGH SCHOOL-WEST 1,263 6,034,230 288,449 319,813 6,642,492 5,259 6002077 ROSE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL 364 2,069,794 154,956 72,804 2,297,554 6,312 6002078 BARING CROSS CENTER 40 398,154 88,335 7,969 494,458 12,361 NIA SECONDARY ALTERNATIVE NIA 411,646 51,707 61,633 524,986 NIA NIA ELEMENTARY ALTERNATIVE NIA 451,405 20,181 24,986 496,572 NIA TOT AL EXPENSE 8,802 40,205,619 3,167,679 2,124,324 45,497,622 5,169 Funding Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg Expense Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg Total Category FY 95196 This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. This category consists of funding for desegregation purposes. This category consists of expenses incurred relative to regular program expense funded by unrestricted local, state and federal sources. This category consists of expenses funded by restricted federal sources. This category consists of expenses incurred relative to desegregation programs funded from desegregation sources. The totals in this column represent the total expense for each school site for fiscal year 199511996. Cost Per Student Category FY 9il96 SOURCES: The cost per student figures were calculated by dividing each school's fiscal year 199511996 total expense by their enrollment as of October 1 , 1995. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 644 I LEA# 6002053 6002054 6002056 6002063 6002064 6002065 6002067 I SOURCES: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR CYCLE 1 SCHOOL PROGRAMS FY 95/96 I FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; SCHOOL @ 10/01/95 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL BELWOOD ELEMENTARY 126 652,049 35,593 37,143 724,785 BOONE PARK ELEM 429 1,685,711 291,245 96,126 2,073,082 GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY 209 947,419 90,520 65,499 1,103,438 N. HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 398 1,570,100 158,366 89,921 1,818,387 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY 288 1,049,001 116,660 68,714 1,234,375 PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY 346 1,541,294 105,036 96,913 1,743,243 REDWOOD ELEMENTARY 223 1,067,777 147,219 53,483 1,268,479 TOT AL EXPENSE I 2,019 I 8,513,351 944,639 507,799 9,965,789 See the note section for Cost Per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 645 COST PER STU FY 95/96 5,752 4,832 5,280 4,569 4,286 5,038 5,688 4,936 - NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT BY PROGRAM FY 95/96 PERCENT AVG COST DISTRICT VARIANCE PROGRAM OF PER STUDENT AVG COST OVER DIST AVG/ SCHOOL PROGRAM COST TOTAL COST BY PROGRAM PER STUDENT (UNDER DIST AVG) ELEMENTARY PROGRAMS 24,007,591 52.8% 5,013 5,169 (156) JR. HIGH PROGRAMS 7,690,795 16.9% 5,297 5,169 128 HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAMS 13,799,236 30.3% 5,388 5,169 219 NLRSD PROGRAM COST FY 95/96 NLRSD COST PER STU FY 95/96 25000000 20000000 15000000 10000000 5000000 0 PROGRAM COST PERCENT OF TOTAL COST AVG COST PER STUDENT BY PROGRAM DISTRICT AVG COST PER STU VARIANCE SOURCE: 5400 5200 5000 4800 Program costs consist of the total cost for FY 95/96 for the indicated category of school programs. The percentage of program cost to the total district cost of $45,497,622 for FY 95/96. The total program cost for FY 95/96 to the total number of students in the program category. The total cost for FY 95/96 of $45,497,622 to the total enrollment at October 1, 1995 of 8,802. The difference between the cost per student by program and the district average cost per student. A positive variance indicates the cost per student by program is greater than the district cost per student, and a negative variance indicates the cost per student by program is less than the district cost per student. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office. 646 LEA# 6002050 6002053 6002054 6002055 6002056 6002057 6002058 6002059 6002060 6002061 6002063 6002064 6002065 6002067 6002069 6002078 N/A SOURCES: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR ELEMENTARY PROGRAMS FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; SCHOOL @ 10/01/95 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL AMBOY ELEMENTARY 439 1,728,817 158,226 97,706 1,984,749 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY 126 652,049 35,593 37,143 724,785 BOONE PARK ELEM 429 1,685,711 291,245 96,126 2,073,082 CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY 243 1,001,820 51,097 59,947 1,112,864 GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY 209 947,419 90,520 65,499 1,103,438 INDIAN HILLS ELEMENTARY 382 1,729,148 182,640 87,780 1,999,568 LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY 224 838,566 116,532 56,017 1,011,115 CENTRAL ELEMENTARY 403 1,758,396 213,554 91,824 2,063,774 LYNCH DRIVE ELEM 435 1,684,142 208,795 100,618 1,993,555 MEADOW PARK ELEM 227 933,261 105,375 56,923 1,095,559 N. HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 398 1,570,100 158,366 89,921 1,818,387 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY 288 1,049,001 116,660 68,714 1,234,375 PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY 346 1,541,294 105,036 96,913 1,743,243 REDWOOD ELEMENTARY 223 1,067,777 147,219 53,483 1,268,479 SEVENTH STREET ELEM 377 1,547,852 154,768 86,968 1,789,588 BARING CROSS CENTER 40 398,154 88,335 7,969 494,458 ELEMENTARY ALTERNATIVE N/A 451,405 20,181 24,986 496,572 TOTAL EXPENSE 4,789 20,584,912 2,244,142 1,178,537 24,007,591 See the note section for Cost Per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 647 COST PER STU FY 95/96 4,521 5,752 4,832 4,580 5,280 5,234 4,514 5,121 4,583 4,826 4,569 4,286 5,038 5,688 4,747 12,361 N/A 5,013 LEA# 6002070 6002072 6002077 URGES: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR JR HIGH PROGRAMS FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; SCHOOL @ 10/01/95 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL LAKEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL 485 2,337,195 68,419 97,046 2,502,660 RIDGEROAD MIDDLE SCHOOL 603 2,639,520 130,587 120,474 2,890,581 ROSE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL 364 2,069,794 154,956 72,804 2,297,554 TOT AL EXPENSE 1,452 7,046,509 353,962 290,324 7,690,795 See the note section for Cost Per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 648 COST PER STU FY 95/96 5,160 4,794 6,312 5,297 I LEA# 6002075 6002076 N/A I SOURCES: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAMS FY 95/96 I FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; B SCHOOL @ 10/01/95 STATE FEDERAL DESEG NLR HIGH SCHOOL-EAST 1,298 6,128,322 229,419 274,017 6,631,758 NLR HIGH SCHOOL-WEST 1,263 6,034,230 288,449 319,813 6,642,492 SECONDARY ALTERNATIVE N/A 411,646 51,707 61,633 524,986 TOT AL EXPENSE I 2,561 II 12,574,198 I 569,575 I 655,463 I 13,799,236 See the note section for Cost Per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 649 COST PER STU FY 95/96 5,109 5,259 N/A 5,388 I NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CYCLE 1 SCHOOL TEACHER \u0026amp; ADMINISTRATOR EXPENSE FY 95/96 TEACHER ADMINISTRATOR G\nJ LEA# SCHOOL SALARIES SALARIES 6002053 6002054 6002056 6002063 6002064 6002065 6002067 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY 172,649 45,194 BOONE PARK ELEM 769,643 81,814 GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY 472,253 45,261 N. HEIGHTS ELEMENT ARY 619,285 81,621 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY 467,983 44,101 PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY 771,728 45,397 REDWOOD ELEMENTARY 478,999 48,828 TOTAL II 3,752,540 I 392,216 Total district expense for teacher and school site administrator salaries for FY 95/96 was $20,715,738 or 45.5 percent of total expense for FY 95/96 of $45,497,622. Teacher Expense II FY95/96 Teacher salary expense for each Cycle 1 school for FY 95/96. Administrator Expense 217,843 851,457 517,514 700,906 512,084 817,125 527,827 4,144,756 FY95/96 Administrator salary expense for each Cycle 1 school for FY 95/96. Total Category FY95/96 The totals in this column represent the total teacher and administrator salary expense for each Cycle 1 school for FY 95/96. SOURCE: The North Little Rock School District Finance Office. 650 I NLRSD PROGRAM COST FY 96/97 651 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT TOTAL PROGRAM OPERATING BUDGET FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES LOCAUSTATE FEDERAL LEA# SCHOOL PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS LEGAL PROGRAM DISTRICT 6002050 AMBOY ELEMENT ARY 1,309,154 561,443 69,775 1,401 113,250 56,384 6002053 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY 684,749 256,481 31,875 640 97,256 25,758 6002054 BOONE PARK ELEM 1,594,213 871,097 108,259 2,174 175,448 87,481 6002055 CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY 729,529 406,616 50,534 1,015 55,533 40,835 6002056 GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY 890,806 292,451 36,345 730 65,726 29,370 6002057 INDIAN HILLS ELEMENTARY 1,375,541 592,721 73,662 1,479 125,284 59,525 6002058 LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY 674,180 331,549 41,204 828 82,671 33,296 6002059 CENTRAL ELEMENTARY 1,303,396 547,368 68,026 1,366 194,355 54,970 6002060 LYNCH DRIVE ELEM 1,368,755 691,247 85,907 1,725 135,678 69,420 6002061 MEADOW PARK ELEM 767,739 331,549 41,204 828 69,474 33,296 6002063 N HEIGHTS ELEMENT ARY 1,146,905 720,962 89,600 1,800 117,670 72,404 6002064 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY 844,885 441,022 54,810 1,101 74,142 44,290 6002065 PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY 1,178,378 588,030 73,079 1,468 73,553 59,054 6002067 REDWOOD ELEMENTARY 872,657 320,601 39,844 800 78,042 32,197 6002069 SEVENTH STREET ELEM 1,163,805 511,398 63,556 1,277 104,156 51,358 6002070 LAKEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL 1,876,012 792,901 98,541 1,979 132,555 79,628 6002072 RIDGEROAD MIDDLE SCHOOL 2,086,635 946,164 117,588 2,362 61,083 95,020 6002075 NLR HIGH SCHOOL-EAST 5,242,253 2,144,118 266,467 5,352 21,916 215,327 6002076 NLR HIGH SCHOOL-WEST 5,207,064 2,105,020 261,608 5,254 143 064 211,400 6002077 ROSE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL 1,914,800 569,263 70,747 1,421 N/A ARGENT A ACADEMY 675,436 0 0 0 TOT AL PROGRAM BUDGET 32,906,892 14,022,001 1,742,631 35,000 re daldl SOURCE For the first quarter of FY 96/97, the district Incurred expenses totaling s\nSee the note section on the next page for explanations of the categories. The North Little Rock School District Fin nee Office. 65 DESEGREGATION PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS LEGAL TOTAL 31,989 13,836 14,787 3,403 2,175,422 16,732 6,321 6,755 1,555 1,128,122 38,954 21,467 22,943 5,281 2,927,317 17,826 10,021 10,710 2,465 1,325,084 21,767 7,207 7,703 1,773 1,353,878 33,611 14,607 15,611 3,593 2,295,634 16,473 8,171 8,732 2,010 1,199,114 31,848 13,489 14,417 3,318 2,232,553 33,445 17,035 18,206 4,190 2,425,608 18,759 8,171 8,732 2,010 1,281,762 28,024 17,767 18,989 4,370 2,218,491 20,645 10,868 11,616 2,673 1,506,052 28,793 14,491 15,488 3,565 2,035,8 21,323 7,901 8,444 1,943 1,383,752 28,437 12,603 13,469 3,100 1,953,159 45,840 19,540 20,883 4,807 3,072,8 50,986 23,317 24,920 5,730 3,413,6i1 128,093 52,839 56,472 12,997 8,145,8 127,233 51,876 55,442 12,760 8,180 721 .. ---  A nQ'i ~451 2,843, 10 011,A() v,ut ~ I, ff I \" I NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT TOTAL PROGRAM OPERATING BUDGET FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES LOCAUSTATE FEDERAL DESEGREGATION LEA# SCHOOL PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS LEGAL PROGRAM DISTRICT PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS 6002050 AMBOY ELEMENT ARY 1,309,154 561,443 69,775 1,401 113,250 56,384 31,989 13,836 14,787 6002053 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY 684,749 256,481 31,875 640 97,256 25,758 16,732 6,321 6,755 6002054 BOONE PARK ELEM 1,594,213 871,097 108,259 2,174 175,448 87,481 38,954 21,467 22,943 6002055 CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY 729,529 406,616 50,534 1,015 55,533 40,835 17,826 10,021 10,710 6002056 GLENVIEW ELEMENT ARY 890,806 292,451 36,345 730 65,726 29,370 21,767 7,207 7,703 6002057 INDIAN HILLS ELEMENTARY 1,375,541 592,721 73,662 1,479 125,284 59,525 33,611 14,607 15,611 6002058 LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY 674,180 331,549 41,204 828 82,671 33,296 16,473 8,171 8,732 6002059 CENTRAL ELEMENTARY 1,303,396 547,368 68,026 1,366 194,355 54,970 31,848 13,489 14,417 6002060 LYNCH DRIVE ELEM 1,368,755 691,247 85,907 1,725 135,678 69,420 33,445 17,035 18,206 6002061 MEADOW PARK ELEM 767,739 331,549 41,204 828 69,474 33,296 18,759 8,171 8,732 6002063 N. HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 1,146,905 720,962 89,600 1,800 117,670 72,404 28,024 17,767 18,989 6002064 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY 844,885 441,022 54,810 1,101 74,142 44,290 20,645 10,868 11,616 6002065 PIKE VIEW ELEMENT ARY 1,178,378 588,030 73,079 1,468 73,553 59,054 28,793 14,491 15,488 6002067 REDWOOD ELEMENTARY 872,657 320,601 39,844 800 78,042 32,197 21,323 7,901 8,444 6002069 SEVENTH STREET ELEM 1,163,805 511,398 63,556 1,277 104,156 51,358 28,437 12,603 13,469 6002070 LAKEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL 1,876,012 792,901 98,541 1,979 132,555 79,628 45,840 19,540 20,883 6002072 RIDGEROAD MIDDLE SCHOOL 2,086,635 946,164 117,588 2,362 61,083 95,020 50,986 23,317 24,920 6002075 NLR HIGH SCHOOL-EAST 5,242,253 2,144,118 266,467 5,352 21,916 215,327 128,093 52,839 56,472 6002076 NLR HIGH SCHOOL-WEST 5,207,064 2,105,020 261,608 5,254 143,064 211,400 127,233 51,876 55,442 6002077 ROSE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL 1,914,800 569,263 70,747 1,421 150,949 57,169 46,788 14,029 14,993 NIA ARGENT A ACADEMY 675,436 0 0 0 92,881 0 16,504 0 0 TOTAL PROGRAM BUDGET 32,906,892 14,022,001 1,742,631 35,000 2,164,686 1,408,182 804,070 345,556 369,312 For the first quarter of FY 96/97, the district incurred expenses totaling $7,000,164 or 13.0 percent of their total FY 96/97 budget. SOURCE: See the note section on the next page for explanations of the categories. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office. 652 LEGAL TOTAL 3,403 2,175,422 1,555 1,128,122 5,281 2,927,317 2,465 1,325,084 1,773 1,353,878 3,593 2,295,634 2,010 1,199,114 3,318 2,232,553 4,190 2,425,608 2,010 1,281,762 4,370 2,218,491 2,673 1,506,052 3,565 2,035,8 I 1,943 1,383,752 3,100 1,953,159 4,807 3,072,8 5,736 3,413,811 12,997 8,145,8 4 12,760 8,180,121 3,451 2,843, ,o 0 784,821 85,000 53,6 l, .,0 NOTES FOR NLRSD TOTAL PROGRAM OPERATING BUDGET SCHEDULE FOR FY 96/97 Funding Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg Expense Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg Total Category FY 96197 SOURCE: This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. This category consists of funding for desegregation purposes. This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to regular program expense, district expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded by unrestricted local, state and federal sources. This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to federal program expense and district expense funded by restricted federal sources. This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to desegregation program expense, district expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded from desegregation sources. The totals in this column represent the total budget for each school site for fiscal year 1996/1997. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office. 653 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CYCLE 1 SCHOOL PROGRAM OPERATING BUDGET FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES LOCAUSTATE FEDERAL DESEGREGATION LEA# SCHOOL PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS LEGAL PROGRAM DISTRICT PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS 6002053 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY 684,749 256.481 31,875 640 97,256 25,758 16,732 6,321 6,755 6002054 BOONE PARK ELEM 1,594,213 871,097 108,259 2,174 175,448 87,481 38,954 21,467 22,943 6002056 GLENVIEW ELEMENT ARY 890,806 292.451 36,345 730 65,726 29,370 21,767 7,207 7,703 6002063 N.HE~HTSELEMENTARY 1,146,905 720,962 89,600 1,800 117,670 72,404 28,024 17,767 18,989 6002064 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY 844,885 441,022 54,810 1,101 74,142 44,290 20,645 10,868 11,616 6002065 PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY 1,178,378 588,030 73,079 1,468 73,553 59,054 28,793 14,491 15.488 6002067 REDWOOD ELEMENT ARY 872,657 320,601 39,844 800 78,042 32,197 21,323 7,901 8.444 TOTAL CYCLE 1 PROGRAM BUDGET 7,212,593 3,490,644 433,812 8,713 681,837 350,554 176,238 86,022 91,938 OURCE: The district's Total Program Expense for the first quarter of FY 96/97 was $7,000,163, with the Total Program Budget for FY 96/97 budgeted at $53,883,330. The programs funded in each of the Cycle 1 schools are indicated on the chart entitled \"Programs in Cycle 1 Schools.\" See the note section for Total Program Operating Budget for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories and totals. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office. 654 LEGAL TOTAL 1,555 1,128,122 5,281 2,927,317 1,773 1,353,878 4,370 2,218,491 2,673 1,506,052 3,565 2,035,899 1,943 1,383,752 21,160 12,553,511 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Programs in Cycle 1 Schools FY 96/97 BELWOOD BOONE PARK GLENVIEW N. HEIGHTS PARK HILL PIKE VIEW REDWOOD PROGRAMS ELEM ELEM ELEM ELEM ELEM ELEM ELEM Four-Year Old X X Kindergarten X X X X X X X Elementary X X X X X X X Elementary Music X X X X X X X Itinerant Instruction X X X X X X X Resource Room X X X X X X X Special Class X X X X X Homebound \u0026amp; Hospital X X X X X X X Gifted \u0026amp; Talented X X X X X X X Guidance Services X X X X X X X Library Services X X X X X X X SOURCE: The North Little Rock School District Finance Office. 655  LEA# 6002053 6002054 6002056 6002063 6002064 6002065 6002067 SOURCE:  NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR CYCLE 1 SCHOOL PROGRAMS FY 96/97 I FUNDING SOURCES I ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; SCHOOL @ 10/01/96 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL BELWOOD ELEMENTARY 164 973,745 123,014 31,363 1,128,122 BOONE PARK ELEM 557 2,575,743 262,929 88,645 2,927,317 GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY 187 1,220,332 95,096 38,450 1,353,878 N. HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 461 1,959,267 190,074 69,150 2,218,491 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY 282 1,341,818 118,432 45,802 1,506,052 PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY 376 1,840,955 132,607 62,337 2,035,899 REDWOOD ELEMENTARY 205 1,233,902 110,239 39,611 1,383,752 TOT AL BUDGET 2,232 11,145,762 1,032,391 375,358 12,553,511 See the note section for Cost per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 657  COST PER STU FY 96/97 6,879 5,256 7,240 4,812 5,341 5,415 6,750 5,624 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL msTR CT COST PER STUDENT FOR TOTAL PROGRAMS FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL\u0026amp; COST PER STU LEA# 6002050 6002053 6002054 6002055 6002056 6002057 6002058 6002059 6002060 6002061 6002063 6002064 6002065 6002067 6002069 6002070 6002072 6002075 6002076 6002077 NIA SCHOOL @ 10/01/96 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL AMBOY ELEMENTARY 359 1,941,773 169,634 64,015 2,175,422 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY 164 973,745 123,014 31,363 1,128,122 BOONE PARK ELEM 557 2,575,743 262,929 88,645 2,927,317 CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY 260 1,187,694 96,368 41,022 1,325,084 GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY 187 1,220,332 95,096 38,450 1,353,878 INDIAN HILLS ELEMENTARY 379 2,043,403 184,809 67,422 2,295,634 LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY 212 1,047,761 115,967 35,386 1,199,114 CENTRAL ELEMENTARY 350 1,920,156 249,325 63,072 2,232,553 LYNCH DRIVE ELEM 442 2,147,634 205,098 72,876 2,425,608 MEADOW PARK ELEM 212 1,141,320 102,770 37,672 1,281,762 N. HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 461 1,959,267 190,074 69,150 2,218,491 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY 282 1,341,818 118,432 45,802 1,506,052 PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY 376 1,840,955 132,607 62,337 2,035,899 RED'NOOD ELEMENTARY 205 1,233,902 110,239 39,611 1,383,752 SEVENTH STREET ELEM 327 1,740,036 155,514 57,609 1,953,159 LAKEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL 507 2,769,433 212,183 91,070 3,072,686 RIDGEROAD MIDDLE SCHOOL 605 3,152,749 156,103 104,959 3,413,811 NLR HIGH SCHOOL-EAST 1,371 7 658,190 237,243 250,401 8,145,834 NLR HIGH SCHOOL-WEST 1,346 7 578,946 354,464 247,311 8,180,721 ROSE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL 364 2,556,231 208,118 79,261 2,843,610 ARGENTA ACADEMY NIA 675,436 92,881 16,504 784,821 TOTAL BUDGET 8,966 48,706,524 3,572,868 1,603,938 53,883,330 For the first quarter of FY 96/97, the district incurred expenses totaling $7,000,164 or 13.0 percent of their total budget for the fiscal year. Funding Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. This category consists of funding for desegregation purposes. Expense Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg Total Category FY96/97 This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to regular programs funded by unrestricted local, state and federal sources. This category consists of budgeted expenses funded by restncted federal sources. This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to desegregation programs funded from desegregation sources. The totals in this column represent the total budget for each school site for fiscal year 1996/1997. Cost Per Student Category FY96197 SOURCE. The cost per student figures were calculated by dividing each school's FY 00/97 total budget by their enrollment as of October 1 , 1996 The North Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE 656 FY 96/97 6,060 6,879 5,256 5,096 7,240 6,057 5,656 6,379 5,488 6,046 4,812 5,341 5,415 6,750 5,973 6,061 5,643 5,942 6,078 7,812 NIA 6,010 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT BY PROGRAM FY 96/97 . PERCENT AVG COST DISTRICT VARIANCE PROGRAM OF PER STUDENT AVG COST OVER DIST AVG/ SCHOOL PROGRAM BUDGET TOTAL BUDGET BY PROGRAM PER STUDENT (UNDER DIST AVG) ELEMENTARY PROGRAMS 28,226,668 52.4% 5,914 6,010 (96) JR. HIGH PROGRAMS 9,330,107 17.3% 6,321 6,010 311 HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAMS 16,326,555 30.3% 6,009 6,010 (1) NLRSD PROGRAM COST FY 96/97 NLRSD COST PER STU FY 96/97 30000000 20000000 10000000 0 PROGRAM COST PERCENT OF TOTAL COST AVG COST PER STUDENT BY PROGRAM DISTRICT AVG COST PER STU VARIANCE SOURCE: 6400 6200 6000 5800 5600 Program costs consist of the total budget for FY 00/97 for the indicated category of school programs. The percentage of program budget to the total district budget of $53,883,330 for FY 00/97. The total program budget for FY 00/97 to the total number of students in the program category. The total budget for FY 96/97 of $53,883,330 to the total enrollment at October 1, 1996 of 8,006. The difference between the cost per student by program and the district average cost per student. A positive variance indicates the cost per student by program is greater than the district cost per student, and a negative variance indicates the cost per student by program is less than the district cost per student. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office. 658 I LEA# 6002050 6002053 6002054 6002055 6002056 6002057 6002058 6002059 6002060 6002061 6002063 6002064 6002065 6002067 6002069 N/A SOURCE: - NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR ELEMENTARY PROGRAMS FY 96/97 I FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; SCHOOL @ 10/01/96 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL AMBOY ELEMENTARY 359 1,941,773 169,634 64,015 2,175,422 BELWOOD ELEMENT ARY 164 973,745 123,014 31,363 1,128,122 BOONE PARK ELEM 557 2,575,743 262,929 88,645 2,927,317 CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY 260 1,187,694 96,368 41,022 1,325,084 GLENVIEW ELEMENT ARY 187 1,220,332 95,096 38,450 1,353,878 INDIAN HILLS ELEMENT ARY 379 2,043,403 184,809 67,422 2,295,634 LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY 212 1,047,761 115,967 35,386 1,199,114 CENTRAL ELEMENTARY 350 1,920,156 249,325 63,072 2,232,553 LYNCH DRIVE ELEM 442 2,147,634 205,098 72,876 2,425,608 MEADOW PARK ELEM 212 1,141,320 102,770 37,672 1,281,762 N. HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 461 1,959,267 190,074 69,150 2,218,491 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY 282 1,341,818 118,432 45,802 1,506,052 PIKE VIEW ELEMENT ARY 376 1,840,955 132,607 62,337 2,035,899 REDWOOD ELEMENT ARY 205 1,233,902 110,239 39,611 1,383,752 SEVENTH STREET ELEM 327 1,740,036 155,514 57,609 1,953,159 ARGENTA ACADEMY N/A 675,436 92,881 16,504 784,821 TOTAL BUDGET 4,773 24,990,975 2,404,757 830,936 28,226,668 See the note section for Cost per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 659 - COST PER STU FY 96/97 6,060 6,879 5,256 5,096 7,240 6,057 5,656 6,379 5,488 6,046 4,812 5,341 5,415 6,750 5,973 N/A 5,914 LEA# 6002070 6002072 6002077 I SOURCE: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR JR HIGH PROGRAMS FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; SCHOOL @ 10/01/96 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL LAKEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL 507 2,769,433 212,183 91,070 3,072,686 RIDGEROAD MIDDLE SCHOOL 605 3,152,749 156,103 104,959 3,413,811 ROSE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL 364 2,556,231 208,118 79,261 2,843,610 TOTAL BUDGET I 1,476 I 8,478,413 576,404 275,290 9,330,107 See the note section for Cost per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 660 COST PER STU FY 96/97 6,061 5,643 7,812 6,321 LEA# 6002075 6002076 I SOURCE: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAMS FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; SCHOOL @ 10/01/96 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL NLR HIGH SCHOOL-EAST 1,371 7,658,190 237,243 250,401 8,145,834 NLR HIGH SCHOOL-WEST 1,346 7,578,946 354,464 247,311 8,180,721 TOTAL BUDGET I 2,717 I 15,237,136 591,707 497,712 16,326,555 See the note section for Cost per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal SeNices Division of the ADE. 661 COST PER STU FY 96/97 5,942 6,078 6,009 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CYCLE 1 SCHOOL TEACHER \u0026amp; ADMINISTRATOR BUDGET FY 96/97 LEA# SCHOOL TEACHER SALARIES ADMINISTRATOR SALARIES 6002053 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY 374,255 45,194 6002054 BOONE PARK ELEM 939,459 96,460 6002056 GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY 460,090 44,966 6002063 N. HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 656,954 85,575 6002064 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY 556,328 44,101 6002065 PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY 744,339 45,397 6002067 REDWOOD ELEMENTARY 467,337 48,828 TOTAL BUDGET 4,198,762 410,521 Teacher Budget FY 96/97 The district's total teacher and school site administrator salary expense for the first quarter of FY 96/97 was $2,542,867 or 36.3 percent of the district's total expense for the same period of $7,000,164. The district's teacher and school site administrator budget for FY 96/97 totaled $22,450,193 or 41. 7 percent of the district's total budget for FY 96/97 of $53,883,330. Teacher salary budget for each Cycle 1 school for FY 96/97. Administrator Budget FY 96197 Total Category FY 96197 SOURCE: School site administrator budget for each Cycle 1 school for FY 96/97. The totals represent the total teacher and school site administrator salary budget for each Cycle 1 school for FY 96/97. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office. 662 TOTAL 419,449 1,035,919 505,056 742,529 600,429 789,736 516,165 4,609,283 PCSSD PROGRAM COST FY 95/96 663    F . BUDGET INFORMATION (Continued) 1. Cost of operating all elementary programs, junior high school programs, and high school programs by funding source (local/regular state/federal and special state desegregation funding). (Continued) Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) (Continued) Enrollment Total district enrollment as of October 1, 1995 declined by 67 students or 0.3 percent in FY 95/96 for a total enrollment of 20,285 as compared with total enrollment as of October 1, 1994 of20,352. Enrollment declined in FY 96/97 to 20,047 as of October I, 1996 resulting in a decrease in enrollment of 1. 2 percent. Enrollment in the district's elementary schools decreased from 11,476 in FY 94/95 to 11,313 or 1.4 percent in FY 95/96. Elementary enrollment decrea ed an additional 2.5 percent in FY 96/97 to 11,029 as of October 1, 1996. Junior high school enrollment declined by 27 students\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_261","title":"Arkansas Department of Education's Semiannual Monitoring Report, Volume 2","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["1997-02-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Educational statistics","Education and state","Education--Evaluation"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Department of Education's Semiannual Monitoring Report, Volume 2"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/261"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n CONTENTS VOLUME II Budget Information Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 598 Budget Information Summary FY 95-96 \u0026amp; FY 96-97 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 599 Program Cost Summary FY 95-96 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 601 Little Rock School District Program Cost FY 95-96 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 607 Little Rock School District Program Cost FY 96-97 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 623 North Little Rock School District Program Cost FY 95-96 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 636 North Little Rock School District Program Cost FY 96-97 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 651 Pulaski County Special School District Program Cost FY 95-96 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 663 Pulaski County Special School District Program Cost FY 96-97 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 679 Transportation Cost Summary FY 95-96 \u0026amp; FY 96-97 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 692 Little Rock School District Transportation Cost FY 95-96 \u0026amp; FY 96-97 . . . . . . . . . 699  North Little Rock School District Transportation Cost FY 95-96 \u0026amp; 96-97 ...... 701  Pulaski County Special School District Transportation Cost FY 95-96 \u0026amp; 96-97 . 704 Legal Fees Summary FY 95-96 \u0026amp; 96-97 ............................ . . . . . . 707 Little Rock School District Legal Fees FY 95-96 \u0026amp; 96-97 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 713 North Little Rock School District Legal Fees FY 95-96 \u0026amp; 96-97 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 716 Pulaski County Special School District Legal Fees FY 95-96 \u0026amp; FY 96-97 . . . . . . . 719 Compensatory Education FY 95-96 \u0026amp; 96-97 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 722 Magnet School Cost FY 95-96 \u0026amp; 96-97 ................................... 727 Student Discipline Expulsion PCSSD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 732 Perceptual Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 740 ECOE Monitoring for Cycle I School . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 746 F.  BUDGET INFORMATION The Allen Letter requires the collection of the following financial reports quarterly or monthly were available: 1. Cost of operating all elementary programs, junior high school programs, and high school programs by funding source (local/regular state/federal and special state desegregation funding .) 2. Transportation cost and funding source. 3. All legal fees reported by type of services. 4. Compensatory Education Program costs. 5. Magnet school cost. This information follows for each school district in Pulaski County. Cost of operating all elementary programs, junior high school programs, and high school programs by funding source (local/regular state/federal and special state desegregation funding). Financial information for FY 96-97 is presented for the three school districts in Pulaski County as specified by the Allen Letter and the Settlement Agreement. The financial information contains actual expenses for the Little Rock School District (LRSD) and the North Little Rock School District (NLRSD) and the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD). The financials include schedules on Total Program Costs for FY 96-97 Cost per Student information, Total Program Costs for Elementary, Junior High and High Schools, and Teacher and School Administrator Costs. 598   BUDGET INFORMATION FY 95/96 \u0026amp; FY 96/97 599    F . BUDGET INFORMATION The Allen Letter, the Pulaski County School Desegregation Case Settlement Agreement dated September 28, 1989 (Settlement Agreement) and the Implementation Plan detail specific monitoring responsibilities regarding financial information and various desegregation financial obligations of the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) to the three school districts in Pulaski County. The financial monitoring responsibilities detailed in the Allen Letter are presented in this section of the February 1, 1997 Monitoring Report. The Settlement Agreement and Implementation Plan state that the ADE is financially responsible for the following: desegregation compensatory education payments\npayments in lieu of formula~ payments for operating the six original magnet schools in the LRSD\nM-to-M incentive payments for sending and receiving schools\nMagnet and M-toM transportation costs\n$20 million in loans to the LRSD\nattorney's fees\n$75,000 annually to the Magnet Review Committee~ and $200,000 annually to the Office of Desegregation Monitoring (ODM) . SOURCES: The ADE General Finance Section and the ADE Local Fiscal Services Section. 600   PROGRAM COST FY 95/96 \u0026amp; FY 96/97 601    F . BUDGET INFORMATION 1. Cost of operating all elementary programs, junior high school programs, and high school programs by funding source (local/regular state/federal and special state desegregation funding). Financial information for FY 95/96 and FY 96/97 is presented for the three school districts in Pulaski County as specified by the Allen Letter and the Settlement Agreement. The information for FY 95/97 reflects each district's expenses for the last fiscal year, and the information for FY 96/97 reflects each district's budget for the current fiscal year. The schedules included in this portion of the Budget Section contain information on Total Program Costs, Cost per Student information, Total Program Costs for Elementary, Junior High and High Schools, and Teacher and School Administrator Costs. The financial information for each district reflects an increase in total expenses in each of the three school districts in Pulaski County in FY 95/96 and additional increases budgeted for FY 96/97. Total expenses for the LRSD increased 4.2 percent in FY 95/96 and are budgeted to increase an additional 11.6 percent in FY 96/97 according to district representatives. NLRSD's total expenses increased 3. 6 percent in FY 95/96 and are budgeted to increase an additional 18.4 percent in FY 96/97 according to district representatives. Total expenses in the PCSSD increased 4.1 percent in FY 95/96 and are budgeted to increase an additional 12.3 percent in FY 96/97 according to district representatives. The enrollment figures for the LRSD as of October 1, 1995 showed an increase of 2.3 percent for FY 95/96 and an increase as of October I, 1996 of 0.4 percent for FY 96/97. Enrollment for the NLRSD as of October 1, 1995 indicated a decrease in FY 95/96 of 1. 7 percent and an increase of 1. 9 percent for FY 96/97 from the enrollment figures as of October 1, 1996. The enrollment figures for the PCS SD showed a decline in the FY 95/96 enrollment for October 1, 1995 of 0.3 percent and a decrease in the FY 96/97 enrollment as of October I, 1996 of 1.2 percent. SOURCES: The Finance Offices of each of the three districts in Pulaski County, the ADE General Finance Section, and the ADE Local Fiscal Services Section. 602    F . BUDGET INFORMATION (Continued) 1. Cost of operating all elementary programs, junior high school programs, and high school programs by funding source (local/regular state/federal and special state desegregation funding). (Continued) The LRSD's cost per student figures increased 1.8 percent in FY 95/96 and are budgeted to increase 11.2 percent in FY 96/97. The NLRSD's cost per student figures increased 5.4 percent in FY 95/96 and are budgeted to increase 16.3 percent in FY 96/97. The cost per student figures in the PCS SD for FY 95/96 increased 4. 4 percent and are budgeted to increase 13. 6 percent in FY 96/97. The increases in the cost per student figures for FY 95/96 and FY 96/97 in each of the districts correspond to the increases in total cost for each of the districts and fluctuations in enrollment for FY 95/96 and FY 96/97. The LRSD received funding for desegregation from the ADE in FY 95/96 totaling $17,668,136 and incurred desegregation expenses of$38,391,254, of which $23,396,956 was eligible for funding from the special desegregation funding from the ADE. The LRSD has budgeted their desegregation expense for FY 96/97 at $44,989,746, of which $27,670, I 03 will be eligible for funding from the desegregation funding from the ADE, and should received funding from the ADE for desegregation of approximately $21,413,282 . The LRSD received funding for desegregation from the ADE in FY 95/96 totaling $1,556,119 and incurred desegregation expenses of $2,124,324. The district has budgeted their desegregation expense for FY 96/97 at $1,603,938 and should received funding for desegregation from the ADE totalin0 appro imately $1,785,092. Of the amount expected to be received by the district in FY 96/97, $297,020 of the funds that they have received in FY 96/97 were for tran portation cost from FY 91/92 through FY 95/96 that under normal circum tance would have b en received in prior p riod . The PCSSD received funding for desegregation from the ADE in FY 95/96 totaling $9,529,691 and incurred desegregation expen e of $10,807,566. The district has budgeted their de egr gation exp n e for FY 96/97 at $12,554, 47 and should receive funding for de egregation from the ADE totaling $6,502.412. All of the information rec ived from the ch l di trict ha b n reconcil d for accuracy and reliability with no e cepti n not d ll of the di trict ar utilizing the fund recciv d from th DE for de gr gation purpo e according t record from the di trict . SOURCE The Finance Q[fices \u0026lt;?/ each of the three districts m P11lask1 Count , the Al E General Finance Section, and the ADE Local Fiscal Ser\\'lces Section. 603 PULASKI COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTS TOTAL PROGRAM OPERATING COST FY 95196 FUNDING SOURCES LOCAL/STATE FEDERAL LEA# SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS LEGAL PROGRAM DISTRICT PROGRAM 60-01 LITTLE ROCK 59,499,209 31 ,47'4,967 6 464,867 328,745 3,469,669 3,011 ,807 5,224,242 60-02 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 29,067,633 9,851 ,918 1,264,088 21 ,980 1,975,332 1,192,347 1,491 ,606 60-03 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL 58,635,805 20,711 ,728 5 733,229 111 ,498 2,242,921 1 370,124 3,967,329 Funding Categories Local \u0026amp; State This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. Federal Deseg This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. This category consists of funding for desegregation purposes. Expense Categories DESEGREGATION DISTRICT INCENTIVE MAGNET TRANS 7,789,126 7,618,145 14,752,306 2,720,432 232,811 0 0 301 ,541 5,206.530 0 0 1,553,100 Local \u0026amp; State This category consists of expenses incurred relative to regular program expense, district expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded by unrestricted local, state and federal sources. This category consists of expenses incurred relative to federal program expense and district expense funded by restricted federal sources LEGAL TOTAL 287,003 142,640,518 98,366 45,497,622 295,802 99,828,066 Federal Deseg This category consists of expenses incurred relative to desegregation program expense, district expense, incentive school expense, magnet expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded from desegregation sources. total Category FY 95.196 The totals in this column represent the total expense for each school district for fiscal year 1995/1996. U\"CES: The Finance Offices of each of the school districts in Pulaski County. 604 PULASKI COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTS TOTAL PROGRAM OPERATING BUDGET FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES LOCAUSTATE FEDERAL DESEGREGATION LEA# SCHOOL DISTRICT PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS LEGAL PROGRAM DISTRICT PROGRAM DISTRICT INCENTIVE MAGNET TRANS LEGAL 60-01 LITTLE ROCK 67,909,531 32,888,201 6,026,174 219,950 3,053,330 4,114,111 6,449,163 9,458,364 8,638,910 17,361 ,466 2,886,793 195,050 60-02 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 32,906,892 14,022,001 1,742,631 35,000 2,164,686 1,408,182 804,070 345,556 0 0 369,312 85,000 60-03 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL 70,573,372 18,480,963 5,865,352 155,000 3,501 ,563 945,075 5,681 ,797 4,831,645 0 0 1,781 ,205 260,000 Funding Categories Local \u0026amp; State This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. Federal This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. Deseg This category consists of funding for desegregation purposes. Expense Categories Local \u0026amp; State This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to regular program expense, district expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded by unrestricted local, state and federal sources. Federal This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to federal program expense and district expense funded by restricted federal sources. Deseg This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to desegregation program expense, district expense, incentive expense, magnet expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded from desegregation sources 'f otal Category FY 96197 The totals in this column represent the total budget for each school district for fiscal year 199611997. lJ CES: The Finance Offices of each of the school districts in Pulaski County. 605 TOTAL 159,201 ,043 53,883,330 112,075,972 DISTRICT LITTLE ROCK NORTH LITTLE ROCK PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL Enrollment FY 95196 FY 96197 Percent Variance Cost per Student FY 95196 FY 961')7 Percent Variance Total Program Expense FY 95196 FY 961')7 Percent Variance SOURCES:  PULASKI COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTS PROGRAM VARIANCES FOR FY 96/97 ENROLLMENT COST PER STUDENT TOT Al PROGRAM EXPENSE PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT FY95/96 FY96/97 VARIANCE FY 95/96 FY 96/97 VARIANCE FY95/96 FY96/97 VARIANCE 24,154 24 ,245 04% 5,905 6,566 11 .2% 142,640,518 159,201,043 11.6% 8,802 8,966 1.9% 5,169 6,010 163% 45,497,622 53,883.330 184% 20,285 20,047 -1 .2% 4,921 5,591 136% 99,828,066 112.075,972 12.3% For reporting purposes, the October 1, 1995 enrollment figures verified and published by the ADE are the figures used. For reporting purposes, the October 1, 1996 enrollment figures verified and published by the ADE are the figures used. The difference in the FY 96/97 enrollment and the FY 95/96 enrollment expressed as a percentage. A positive variance indicates the percentage increase in enrollment for FY 96/97 A negative variance indicates the percentage decrease in enrollment for FY 96/97. The average cost per student for the district for FY 95/96. The average cost per student is calculated by dividing total program costs by total enrollment. The average cost per student for the district for FY 96/97. The average cost per student is calculated by dividing total program costs by total enrollment. The difference in the FY 96/97 cost per student and the FY 95/96 cost per student expressed as a percentage. A positive variance indicates the percentage increase in the cost per student for FY 96/97. A negative variance indicates the percentage decrease in the cost per student for FY 96/97. Total expenses for the school district for FY 95/96. Total budget for the school district for FY 96/97. The difference in the FY 96/91 total budget and the total cost for FY 95/96 expressed as a percentage. A positive variance indicates the percentage increase in the total budget for FY 96/97. A negative variance indicates the percentage decrease in the total budget for FY 96/97. The Finance Offices of each of the school districts in Pulaski County. 606  LRSD PROGRAM COST FY 95/96 607    F . BUDGET INFORMATION 1. Co t of operating all elementary programs, junior high school programs, and high school programs by funding source (local/regular tate/federal and special state desegregation funding). Little Rock School District (LRSD) The following is a summary of the LRSD Program Cost Section of the February 1, 1997 Monitoring Report. Total program expense for the district is separated by funding source and expense category within the funding source. Total program expense is actual for FY 95/96 and budgeted for FY 96/97. Separate schedules indicate the total program expense for the Cycle 1 schools. The programs funded by the Cycle 1 schools are also included. Teacher expense and school administrator expense are also presented for the Cycle l schools. Cost per student information is presented for the: district~ elementary school programs~ junior high school programs~ high school programs~ and Cycle 1 school programs. Total Operating Expenses The district's total operating expenses for FY 95/96 were $142,640,518, which was an increase of $5,692,632 or 4.2 percent over FY 94/95 expenses of $136,947,886. The district's total operating expenses for FY 96/97 are budgeted at $159,201,043 resulting in an increase in operating cost of $16,560,525 or 11.6 percent for the current fiscal year. Elementary school operating costs rose from $74,914,489 in FY 94/95 to $78,593,013 in FY 95/96. Elementary school operating costs are budgeted to rise in FY 96/97 to $88,957,879 or 13 .2 percent for the current fiscal year. Operating costs for junior high schools increased 3 .1 percent in FY 95/96 over the operating cost for FY 94/95 of $31,583,460. The cost of operating the district's junior high schools is budgeted to increase $2,753,108 or 8.5 percent in FY 96/97 to $35,295,313 . Operating costs for high schools increased from $30,449,937 in FY 94/95 to $31,505,300 in FY 95/96. The operating costs for the district's high schools are budgeted to increase I 0.9 percent to $34,947,851 in FY 96/97. SOURCES: The Little Rock ,School District Finance q[[ice, the ADE General hnance Section, and the ADE Local Fiscal Services Section. 608    F . BUDGET INFORMATION (Continued) 1. Cost of operating all elementary programs, junior high school programs, and high school programs by funding source (local/regular state/federal and special state desegregation funding). (Continued) Little Rock School District (LRSD) (Continued) Enrollment Total district enrollment as of October 1, 1995 increased by 543 students or 2.3 percent in FY 9 5/96 for a total enrollment of 24, 154 as compared with total enrollment as of October 1, 1994 of 23,611. Enrollment increased in FY 96/97 to 24,245 as of October 1, 1996 resulting in an increase of 0.4 percent. Enrollment in the district's elementary schools increased from 12,959 in FY 94/95 to 13,348 or 3.0 percent in FY 95/96, and elementary enrollment at October 1, 1996 increased to 13,525 for FY 96/97. Junior high school enrollment declined by 58 students from 5,681 in FY 94/95 to 5,623 or 1.0 percent in FY 95/96, and enrollment in the junior high school in FY 96/97 further declined 2.5 percent to 5,486 as of October l, 1996 . Enrollment in the district's high schools increased from 4,97 l in FY 94/95 to 5,183 or 4.3 percent in FY 95/96, and the October 1, 1996 enrollment figures for the district's high schools hawed an increa e in FY 96/97 to 5,234. Cost per Student Rate The district's co t per student rate increa ed from $5,800 in FY 94/95 to $5,905 in FY 95/96 resulting in an overall co t per student incr a e of 1.8 percent. The cost per student rate i budgeted to incr a e l l.2 percent to $6,566 in FY 96/97. The elementary cost per student rate increa cd I. 9 percent in FY 9 5/96 from $5,781 in FY 94/95 to $5,888 in FY 95/96. The elementary co t p r tudent rate is budgeted to increa e an additional 11. 7 percent in FY 96/97 to $6,577. OUR E  The Uttle Rock School 1)1stri t Finance q[[ice, the ADE General Finance l 'ection, and the ADE Local Fiscal. 'en1ces l 'ect1011. 609    F . BUDGET INFORMATION (Continued) 1. Cost of operating all elementary programs, junior high school programs, and high school programs by funding source (local/regular state/federal and special state desegregation funding). (Continued) Little Rock School District (LRSD) (Continued) Cost per Student Rate (Continued) The junior high school cost per student rate increased in FY 95/96 to $5,787 from the FY 94/95 cost per student rate of $5,559. The junior high school cost per student rate is budgeted to increase an additional 11.2 percent in FY 96/97 to $6,434. The high school cost per student rate decreased 0.8 percent in FY 95/96 to $6,079 from the FY 94/95 cost per student rate of $6,126. The high school cost per student rate for FY 96/97 is budgeted to increase 9.8 percent to $6,677. Desegregation Expense In FY 95/96, the district's total desegregation expenses totaled $38,391,254 with $23,396,956 of these costs being eligible for funding from the special funding from the ADE for desegregation. The district received $17,668,136 in desegregation funding from the ADE as stipulated in the Settlement Agreement. In FY 96/97, the district has budgeted $44,989,746 in total desegregation costs with $27,670,103 being eligible for funding from the special desegregation payments made by the ADE. The district should receive approximately $21,413,282 in desegregation funding from the ADE in FY 96/97. All of the information received from the LRSD has been reconciled for accuracy and reliability with no exceptions noted. The district is utilizing the funds received from the ADE in accordance with the Settlement Agreement for desegregation purposes. SOURCES: The Lil/le Rock School District Finance (~ffice, the ADE General h11anc:e Section, and the ADE Local Fiscal Services Section. 610 LOCAIJSTATE LEA# SCHOOL PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS 6001001 CENTRAL HIGH 5,015,500 2,073,225 425,834 6001002 HALL HIGH 3,453 031 1,209,273 248,381 6001003 MANN JR HIGH 0 1,103,722 226,701 6001005 PARKVIEW HIGH 0 1,114,147 228,842 6001006 BOOKER ELEM 0 787,070 161,662 6001007 DUNBAR JR HIGH 2,172,347 953,866 195,921 6001009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 2,527,128 989 049 203,148 6001010 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR HIGH 2,517,134 1,017,718 209,036 6001011 SOUTHWEST JR HIGH 1,863,801 797,494 163,803 6001013 HENDERSON JR HIGH 2,828,893 1,032,052 211,980 6001017 BALE ELEM 1,102,568 406,566 83,507 6001018 BRADY ELEM 1,043,374 491 ,267 100,905 6001020 MCDERMOTT ELEM 1,319,453 634,607 130,347 6001021 CARVER ELEM 0 819,647 168,353 6001023 FAIR PARK ELEM 818,134 304,924 62,631 6001024 FOREST PARK ELEM 1,059,776 566,846 116,429 6001025 FRANKLIN ELEM 0 471 ,721 96,890 6001026 GARLAND ELEM 0 308,834 63,434 6001027 GIBBS ELEM 0 400,050 82,169 6001029 WESTERN HILLS ELEM 874,018 410,475 84,310 6001030 JEFFERSON ELEM 1,376,003 652,851 134,094 6001033 MEAOOWCLIFF ELEM 1,086,027 521 ,238 107,061 6001034 MITCHELL ELEM 0 344,017 70,660 6001035 Ml KING ELEM 83,221 599,424 123,120 6001038 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM 984,174 529,057 108,667 6001039 RIGHTSELL ELEM 0 261 ,922 53,798 6001040 ROMINE ELEM 1,090,720 350,533 71 ,998 6001042 WASHINGTON ELEM 1,839,963 785,767 161,394 6001043 WILLIAMS ELEM 0 661 ,972 135,967 6001044 WILSON ELEM 1,159,297 476,933 97,961 6001045 WOODRUFF ELEM 634,204 284,075 5 ,348 6001047 TERRY ELEM 1,355,220 698,459 143,462 6001048 FULBRIGHT ELEM 1,523,422 675,003 138,644 6001050 ROCKEFELLER ELEM 0 407,869 83,775 6001051 BADGETT ELEM 632,756 226,739 46,571 6001052 BASELINE ELEM 825,709 379,201 77,887 6001053 CHICOT ELEM 1,554,714 565,543 116,161 0001054 CLOVERDALE ELEM B 982,416 521 .238 107,061 o001055 DAVID 0'0000 ELEM 863,240 383,110 78,690 1056 GEYER SPRINGS ELEM 817,062 355,745 73,069 001057 MABELVALE ELEM 1,178,663 577,271 118,570 60()1058 OTTER CREEK ELEM 918,017 441 ,749 90,734 001059 WAKEFIELD ELEM 1,164,481 559,028 114,823 1060 WATSON ELEM 1,072,490 532,966 109,470 1 1 CLOVERDALE JR HIGH 1,780,494 793,585 163,000 001 2 MABELVALE JR HIGH 1,931,658 639,820 131,417 001,0 63 JA FAIR HIGH 3,087,463 1,179,301 242,225 4 MCCLELLAN HIGH 3,401,015 1,177,998 241,957 NI~ METRO HIGH 1,499,733 0 0 NI,A,. AlT LEARNING CTR 45 536 0 0 ISH ELEM 16,354 0 0 0 AL PROGRAM EXPENSE 59,499,209 31,474,967 6,464,867 sou C See the note sec:tlon on the next page for explanation, of the c:ategorles. The Little Rock School 01str1ct Finance Office - - LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT TOTAL PROGRAM OPERATING COST FY 96/96 FUNDING SOURCES FEDERAL DESEGREGATION LEGAL PROGRAM DISTRICT PROGRAM DISTRICT INCENTIVE MAGNET TRANS LEGAL TOTAL 21,654 0 198,385 32,518 513,062 0 0 179,192 18,904 8,478,274 12,630 0 115,714 1,351 299,259 0 0 104,519 11,027 5,455,185 11 528 0 105,614 0 273,139 0 3,351,297 95,396 10,064 5,177,461 11,637 0 106,612 0 275,718 0 3,699,919 96,298 10,159 5,543,332 8,221 0 75,314 0 194,777 0 2,366,402 68,028 7,177 3,668,651 9,963 67,947 91 ,274 199,422 236,054 0 0 82,444 8,698 4,017,936 10,330 66,188 94,641 103,104 244,761 0 0 85,485 9,019 4,332,853 10,630 0 97,384 130,593 251 ,855 0 0 87,963 9,280 4,331 ,593 8,330 100,765 76,311 177,553 197,356 0 0 68,929 7,272 3,461,614 10,779 92,137 98,756 160,466 255,402 0 0 89,202 9,411 4,789,078 4,246 102,347 38,904 131,297 100,613 0 0 35,140 3,707 2,008,895 5,131 116,845 47,009 87,026 121 ,574 0 0 42,461 4,480 2,060,072 6,628 78,489 60,725 7,330 157,047 0 0 54,850 5,787 2,455,263 8,561 0 78,431 0 202,838 0 2,109,225 70,843 7,474 3,465,372 3,185 64,690 29,178 102,117 75,460 0 0 26,355 2,780 1,489,454 5,921 62,082 54,241 29,174 140,278 0 0 48,994 5,169 2,088,910 4,927 121 ,033 45,139 0 116,737 1,928,259 0 40,772 4,301 2,829,779 3,226 32,926 29,552 0 76,427 1,288,699 0 26,693 2,816 1,832,607 4,178 0 38,280 0 99,001 0 1,324,125 34,577 3,648 1,986,028 4,287 91 ,578 39,278 12,553 101,580 0 0 35,478 3,743 1,657,300 6,819 88,207 62 471 30,993 161,561 0 0 56,427 5,953 2,575,379 5,444 112,982 49,877 25,907 128,991 0 0 45,051 4,753 2,087,331 3,593 66,158 32,919 0 85,134 1,188,650 0 29,734 3,137 1,824,002 6,261 75,177 57,358 1,688,082 148,340 0 0 51,809 5,466 2,838,258 5,526 113,866 50,625 22,659 130,926 0 0 45,727 4,824 1,996,051 2,736 81 152 25,063 0 64,818 1,106,724 0 22,638 2,388 1,621,2~9 3,661 68,252 33,542 162,944 86,747 0 0 30,297 3,196 1,901 ,890 8,207 154,972 75189 323,683 194,454 0 0 67,915 7,165 3,618,709 6,914 0 63,343 0 163,819 0 1,901,338 57,215 6,036 2,99{j, 04 4,981 110,803 45,637 68,313 118,027 0 0 41 ,222 4,349 2,1,,,s, 2,967 62,001 27 183 86,677 70,300 0 0 24,553 2,590 1,25 .~ a 7,295 0 66,835 20,103 172,848 0 0 60,369 6,369 2,530, ~ 7,050 91 ,541 64,590 32,281 167,043 0 0 58,342 6,155 2,764,0Yi 4,260 250,744 39,029 0 100,936 2,105,813 0 35,253 3,719 3,0l1, 6 2,368 52,261 21,696 111 973 56,111 0 0 19,597 2,068 1,17.t,1.SO 3,961 93,353 36,285 121 ,121 93,841 0 0 32,775 3,458 1,t 7,~il1 5,907 148,894 54,116 99,869 139,955 0 0 48,881 5,157 P3 .1111 5 444 113,076 49,877 143,215 128,991 0 0 45,051 4,753 2,,01,12 4,001 58,752 36,659 23,078 94,808 0 0 33,113 3,493 ,. -,e, 44 3,716 86,941 34,041 110,059 88,036 0 0 30,748 3,244 1, a:\ni, 1 6,029 153,101 55,239 86,195 142,858 0 0 49,895 5,264 2,Jn,P $ 4,614 82,949 42,271 19,639 109,320 0 0 38,181 4,028 1,751 ,002 5,839 111,627 53,493 19,290 138,343 0 0 48,318 5,097 2,22(),)\n!9 5,567 122,465 50,999 146,460 131 ,893 0 0 46,065 4,860 2,223,235 8,289 90,298 75,937 147,431 196,389 0 0 68,591 7,236 3,Jl1 ,1~0 6,683 60,280 61 ,224 49,866 158,337 0 0 55,301 5,834 J,100,!J2t) 12,317 0 112,846 39,300 291,842 0 0 101,929 10,753 1\n,on, 7fl 12,304 0 112,721 77,937 291 ,520 0 0 101 ,816 10,742 5,1.:it,010 0 22,790 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u:12,61\nI 0 0 0 392,663 0 0 0 0 0 .f'\u0026amp;.1 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ,:.154 328,745 3,469,669 3,011 ,807 5,224,242 7,789,126 7,618,145 14,752,306 2,720,432 287,003 142,ti-10,\u0026amp;1\u0026amp; 611 NOTES FOR LRSD TOTAL PROGRAM OPERATING COST SCHEDULE FOR FY 95/96 Funding Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. This category consists of funding for desegregation purposes. Expense Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg Total Category FY 95/96 SOURCE: This category consists of expenses incurred relative to regular program expense, district expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded by unrestricted local, state and federal sources. This category consists of expenses incurred relative to federal program expense and district expense funded by restricted federal sources. This category consists of expenses incurred relative to desegregation program expense, district expense, incentive expense, magnet expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded from desegregation sources. The totals in this column represent the total expense for each school site for fiscal year 1995/1996. The Little Rock School District Finance Office. 612 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CYCLE 1 SCHOOL PROGRAM OPERATING COST FY 96196 FUNDING SOURCES LOCAUSTATE FEDERAL DESEGREGATION LEA# SCHOOL PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS LEGAL PROGRAM DISTRICT PROGRAM DISTRICT INCENTIVE MAGNET 6001005 PARKVIEW HIGH 0 1,114,147 228,842 11 ,637 0 106,612 0 275,718 0 3,699,919 6001023 FAIR PARK ELEM 818,134 304,924 62,631 3,185 0 29,178 102,117 75,460 0 0 6001024 FOREST PARK ELEM 1,059,776 566,846 116,429 5,921 0 54,241 29,174 140,278 0 0 6001030 JEFFERSON ELEM 1,376,003 652,851 134,094 6,819 112,982 62,471 30,993 161 ,561 0 0 6001038 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM 984,174 529,057 108,667 5,526 75,177 50,625 22,659 130,926 0 0 6001044 WILSON ELEM 1,159,297 476,933 97,961 4,981 113,866 45.637 68,313 118,027 0 0 6001047 TERRY ELEM 1,355,220 698,459 143,462 7,295 81 ,152 66,835 20,103 172,848 0 0 6001052 BASELINE ELEM 825,709 379,201 77,887 3,961 113,076 36,285 121 ,121 93,841 0 0 6001055 DAVID O'DODD ELEM 863,240 383,110 78,690 4,001 86,941 36,659 23,078 94,808 0 0 6001063 JA FAIR HIGH 3,087,463 1,179,301 242,225 12,317 153,101 112,846 39,300 291 ,842 0 0 TOTAL CYCLE 1 PROGRAM EXPENSE 11 ,529,016 6,284,829 1,290,888 65,643 736,295 601 ,389 456,858 1,555,309 0 3,699,919 C RCE: The district's Total Program Expense for fiscal year 1995/1996 was $142,640,518. The programs funded In each of the Cycle 1 schools are Indicated on the chart entitled \"Programs In Cycle 1 Schools.\" See note section for Total Program Operating Cost for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories and totals. The Little Rock School District Finance Otrlce. 613 TRANS LEGAL TOTAL 96,298 10,159 5,543,332 26,355 2,780 1,424,764 48,99-4 5,169 2,026,828 56,427 5,953 2,600,154 45,727 4,824 1,957,362 41,222 4,349 2,130,586 60,369 6,369 2,612,112 32,775 3,458 1,687,314 33,113 3,493 1,607,133 101 ,929 10,753 5,231 ,077 543,209 57,307 26,820,662 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Programs in Cycle 1 Schools FY 95/96 PARKVIEW FAIR PARK FOREST JEFFERSON PULASKI WILSON TERRY BASELINE DAVID O DODD JA FAIR PROGRAMS HIGH ELEM PARK ELEM ELEM HGTS ELEM ELEM ELEM ELEM ELEM HIGH Four-Year Old X X X Kindergarten X X X X X X X X X X Elementary X X X X X X X X Elementary Music X X X X X X X X Itinerant Instruction X X X X X X X X Resource Room X X X X X X X X X X Special Class X X X Homebound \u0026amp; Hospital X X X X X Gifted \u0026amp; Talented X X X X X X X X Guidance Services X X X X X X X X X X Library Services X X X X X X X X X X High School X X Marketing/District Ed-Coop X Business Ed-Coop X Business Ed- Skill Training X X X I Trade \u0026amp; Ind-Coop X irade \u0026amp; lnd-Expl X cons/Homemaking X X I Comp Ed X x I I Coord Career-Coop X SOURCE: The Little Rock School District Finance Office. 614 --- . - LITTLE ROCK SCHOO D~IN:R,T COST PER STUDENT FOR TOTAL PROGRAMS FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL\u0026amp; COST PER STU LEA# SCHOOL @ 10/01/95 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL FY 95/96 6001001 CENTRAL HIGH 1,591 7,536,213 198,385 743,676 8,478,274 5,329 6001002 HALL HIGH 928 4,923,315 115,714 416,156 5,455,185 5,878 6001003 MANN JR. HIGH 847 1,341,951 105,614 3,729,896 5,177,461 6,113 6001005 PARKVIEW HIGH 855 1,354,626 106,612 4,082,094 5,543,332 6,483 6001006 BOOKER ELEM 604 956,953 75,314 2,636,384 3,668,651 6,074 6001007 DUNBAR JR. HIGH 732 3,332,097 159,221 526,618 4,017,936 5,489 6001009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIG 759 3,729,655 160,829 442,369 4,332,853 5,709 6001010 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR. HIG 781 3,754,518 97,384 479,691 4,331,593 5,546 6001011 SOUTHWEST JR. HIGH 612 2,833,428 177,076 451 ,110 3,461 ,614 5,656 6001013 HENDERSON JR. HIGH 792 4,083,704 190,893 514,481 4,789,078 6,047 6001017 BALE ELEM 312 1,596,887 141 ,251 270,757 2,008,895 6,439 6001018 BRADY ELEM 377 1,640,677 163,854 255,541 2,060,072 5,464 6001020 MCDERMOTT ELEM 487 2,091 ,035 139,214 225,014 2,455,263 5,042 6001021 CARVER ELEM 629 996,561 78,431 2,390,380 3,465,372 5,509 6001023 FAIR PARK ELEM 234 1,188,874 93,868 206,712 1,489,454 6,365 6001024 FOREST PARK ELEM 435 1,748,972 116,323 223,615 2,088,910 4,802 6001025 FRANKLIN ELEM 362 573,538 166,172 2,090,069 2,829,779 7,817 6001026 GARLAND ELEM 237 375,494 62,478 1,394,635 1,832,607 7,733 6001027 GIBBS ELEM 307 486,397 38,280 1,461 ,351 1,986,028 6,469 6001029 WESTERN HILLS ELEM 315 1,373,090 130,856 153,354 1,657,300 5,261 6001030 JEFFERSON ELEM 501 2,169,767 150,678 254,934 2,575,379 5,140 6001033 MEAOOWCLIFF ELEM 400 1,719,770 162,859 204,702 2,087,331 5,218 6001034 MITCHELL ELEM 264 418,270 99,077 1,306,655 1,824,002 6,909 6001035 ML KING ELEM 460 812,026 132,535 1,893,697 2,838,258 6,170 6001038 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM 406 1,627,424 164,491 204,136 1,996,051 4,916 6001039 RIGHTSELL ELEM 201 318,456 106,215 1,196,568 1,621 ,239 8,066 6001040 ROMINE ELEM 269 1,516,912 101,794 283,184 1,901 ,890 7,070 6001042 WASHINGTON ELEM 603 2,795,331 230,161 593,217 3,618,709 6,001 6001043 WILLIAMS ELEM 508 804,853 63,343 2,128,408 2,996,604 5,899 6001044 WILSON ELEM 366 1,739,172 156,440 231 ,911 2,127,523 5,813 6001045 WOODRUFF ELEM 218 979,594 89,184 184,120 1,252,898 5,747 6001047 TERRY ELEM 536 2,204,436 66,835 259,689 2,530,960 4,722 6001048 FULBRIGHT ELEM 518 2,344,119 156,131 263,821 2,764,071 5,336 6001050 ROCKEFELLER ELEM 313 495,904 289,773 2,245,721 3,031 ,398 9,685 6001051 BADGETT ELEM 174 908,434 73,957 189,749 1,172,140 6,736 6001052 BASELINE ELEM 291 1,286,758 129,638 251 ,195 1,667,591 5,731 6001053 CHICOT ELEM 434 2,242,325 203,010 293,862 2,739,197 6,312 6001054 CLOVERDALE ELEM 400 1,616,159 162,953 322,010 2,101 ,122 5,253 6001055 DAVID 0'0000 ELEM 294 1,329,041 95,411 154,492 1,578,944 5,371 6001056 GEYER SPRINGS ELEM 273 1,249,592 120,982 232,087 1,602,661 5,871 6001057 MABELVALE ELEM 443 1,880,533 208,340 284,212 2,373,085 5,357 6001058 OTTER CREEK ELEM 339 1,455,114 125,220 171 ,168 1,751 ,502 5,167 6001059 WAKEFIELD ELEM 429 1,844,171 165,120 211 ,048 2,220,339 5,176 6001060 WATSON ELEM 409 1,720,493 173,464 329,278 2,223,235 5,436 6001061 CLOVERDALE JR. HIGH 609 2,745,368 166,235 419,647 3,331 ,250 5,470 6001062 MABELVALE JR. HIGH 491 2,709,578 121 ,504 269,338 3,100,420 6,315 6001063 JA FAIR HIGH 905 4,521 ,306 112,846 443,824 5,077,976 5,611 6001064 MCCLELLAN HIGH 904 4,833,274 112,721 482,015 5,428,010 6,004 N/A METRO HIGH N/A 1,499,733 22,790 0 1,522,523 N/A N/A ALT LEARNING CTR N/A 45,536 0 392,663 438,199 N/A NIA ISH ELEM N/A 16,354 0 0 16,354 N/A TOTAL EXPENSE 24,154 97,767,788 6,481 ,476 38,391 ,254 142,640,518 5,905 See the note section on the next page for explanations of the categories . SOURCES The Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 615 NOTES FOR LRSD COST PER STU FOR TOTAL PROGRAMS FOR FY 95/96 Funding Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. This category consists of funding for desegregation purposes. Expense Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg Total Category FY 95196 This category consists of expenses incurred relative to regular program expense funded by unrestricted local, state and federal sources. This category consists of expenses funded by restricted federal sources. This category consists of expenses incurred relative to desegregation programs funded from desegregation sources. The totals in this column represent the total expense for each school site for fiscal year 1995/1996. Cost Per Student Category FY 95196 SOURCES: The cost per student figures were calculated by dividing the school's total expense for fiscal year 1995/1996 by their enrollment as of October 1, 1995. The Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 616 LEA# 6001005 6001023 6001024 6001030 6001038 6001044 6001047 6001052 6001055 6001063 SOURCES: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR CYCLE 1 SCHOOL PROGRAMS FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; SCHOOL @ 10/01/95 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL PARKVIEW HIGH 855 1,354,626 106,612 4,082,094 5,543,332 FAIR PARK ELEM 234 1,188,874 93,868 206,712 1,489,454 FOREST PARK ELEM 435 1,748,972 116,323 223,615 2,088,910 JEFFERSON ELEM 501 2,169,767 150,678 254,934 2,575,379 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM 406 1,627,424 164,491 204,136 1,996,051 WILSON ELEM 366 1,739,172 156,440 231,911 2,127,523 TERRY ELEM 536 2,204,436 66,835 259,689 2,530,960 BASELINE ELEM 291 1,286,758 129,638 251,195 1,667,591 DAVID O'DODD ELEM 294 1,329,041 95,411 154,492 1,578,944 JA FAIR HIGH 905 4,521,306 112,846 443,824 5,077,976 TOTAL EXPENSE 4,823 19,170,376 1,193,142 6,312,602 26,676,120 See note section for Cost Per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 617 COST PER STU FY 95/96 6,483 6,365 4,802 5,140 4,916 5,813 4,722 5,731 5,371 5,611 5,531 - LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT BY PROGRAM FY 95/96 PERCENT AVG COST DISTRICT VARIANCE PROGRAM OF PER STUDENT AVG COST OVER DIST AVG/ SCHOOL PROGRAM COST TOTAL COST BY PROGRAM PER STUDENT (UNDER DIST AVG) ELEMENTARY PROGRAMS 78,593,013 55.1% 5,888 5,905 (17) JR. HIGH PROGRAMS 32,542,205 22.8% 5,787 5,905 (118) HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAMS 31,505,300 22.1% 6,079 5,905 174 LRSD PROGRAM COST LRSD COST PER STU FY 95/96 80000000 60000000 40000000 20000000 0 JR PROGRAM COST PERCENT OF TOTAL COST AVG COST PER STUDENT BY PROGRAM FY 95/96 6100 6000 5900 5800 5700 5600 Program costs consist of the total cost for FY 95/96 for the indicated category of school programs. The percentage of program cost to the total district cost of $142,640,518 for FY 95/96. The total program cost for FY 95/96 to the total number of students in the program category. DISTRICT AVG COST PER STU The total cost for FY 95/96 of $142,640,518 to the total enrollment at October 1, 1995 of 24,154. VARIANCE SOURCE: The difference between the cost per student by program and the district average cost per student. A positive variance indicates the cost per student by program is greater than the district cost per student, and a negative variance indicates the cost per student by program is less than the district cost per student. The Little Rock School District Finance Office. 618 LEA# 6001006 6001017 6001018 6001020 6001021 6001023 6001024 6001025 6001026 6001027 6001029 6001030 6001033 6001034 6001035 6001038 6001039 6001040 6001042 6001043 6001044 6001045 6001047 6001048 6001050 6001051 6001052 6001053 6001054 6001055 6001056 6001057 6001058 6001059 6001060 NIA NIA SOURCES: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR ELEMENTARY PROGRAMS FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL\u0026amp; SCHOOL @ 10101195 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL BOOKER ELEM 604 956,953 75,314 2,636,384 3,668,651 BALE ELEM 312 1,596,887 141,251 270,757 2,008,895 BRADY ELEM 377 1,640,677 163,854 255,541 2,060,072 MCDERMOTT ELEM 487 2,091,035 139,214 225,014 2,455,263 CARVER ELEM 629 996,561 78,431 2,390,380 3,465,372 FAIR PARK ELEM 234 1,188,874 93,868 206,712 1,489,454 FOREST PARK ELEM 435 1,748,972 116,323 223,615 2,088,910 FRANKLIN ELEM 362 573,538 166,172 2,090,069 2,829,779 GARLAND ELEM 237 375,494 62,478 1,394,635 1,832,607 GIBBS ELEM 307 486,397 38,280 1,461 ,351 1,986,028 WESTERN HILLS ELEM 315 1,373,090 130,856 153,354 1,657,300 JEFFERSON ELEM 501 2,169,767 150,678 254,934 2,575,379 MEADOWCLIFF ELEM 400 1,719,770 162,859 204,702 2,087,331 MITCHELL ELEM 264 418,270 99,077 1,306,655 1,824,002 ML KING ELEM 460 812,026 132,535 1,893,697 2,838,258 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM 406 1,627,424 164,491 204,136 1,996,051 RIGHTSELL ELEM 201 318,456 106,215 1,196,568 1,621,239 ROMINE ELEM 269 1,516,912 101,794 283,184 1,901,890 WASHINGTON ELEM 603 2,795,331 230,161 593,217 3,618,709 WILLIAMS ELEM 508 804,853 63,343 2,128,408 2,996,604 WILSON ELEM 366 1,739,172 156,440 231 ,911 2,127,523 WOODRUFF ELEM 218 979,594 89,184 184,120 1,252,898 TERRY ELEM 536 2,204,436 66.835 259,689 2,530,960 FULBRIGHT ELEM 518 2,344,119 156,131 263,821 2 764,071 ROCKEFELLER ELEM 313 495,904 289,773 2,245,721 3,031 ,398 BADGETT ELEM 174 908,434 73,957 189,749 1,172,140 BASELINE ELEM 291 1,286,758 129,638 251 ,195 1,667,591 CHICOT ELEM 434 2,242,325 203,010 293,862 2,739,197 CLOVERDALE ELEM 400 1,616,159 162,953 322,010 2,101 ,122 DAVID O'DODD ELEM 294 1,329,041 95,411 154,492 1,578,944 GEYER SPRINGS ELEM 273 1,249,592 120,982 232,087 1,602,661 MABEL VALE ELEM 443 1,880,533 208,340 284,212 2,373,085 OTTER CREEK ELEM 339 1,455,114 125,220 171 ,168 1,751 ,502 WAKEFIELD ELEM 429 1,844,171 165,120 211 ,048 2 220.339 WATSON ELEM 409 1,720,493 173,464 329,278 2 223,235 ALT LEARNING CTR NIA 45,536 0 392,663 438,199 ISH ELEM NIA 16,354 0 0 16,354 TOTAL EXPENSE 13,348 48,569,022 4,633,652 25,390,339 78,593,013 See note section for Cost Per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 619 COST PER STU FY 95/96 6,074 6,439 5,464 5,042 5,509 6,365 4,802 7,817 7,733 6,469 5,261 5,140 5,218 6,909 6,170 4,916 8,066 7,070 6,001 5,899 5,813 5,747 4,722 5,336 9,685 6,736 5,731 6,312 5,253 5,371 5,871 5,357 5,167 5,176 5,436 NIA NIA 5,888 I LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR JR HIGH PROGRAMS FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; COST PER STU LEA# SCHOOL @ 10/01/95 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL 6001003 MANN JR. HIGH 847 1,341,951 105,614 3,729,896 5,177,461 6001007 DUNBAR JR. HIGH 732 3,332,097 159,221 526,618 4,017,936 6001009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 759 3,729,655 160,829 442,369 4,332,853 6001010 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 781 3,754,518 97,384 479,691 4,331,593 6001011 SOUTHWEST JR. HIGH 612 2,833,428 177,076 451,110 3,461,614 6001013 HENDERSON JR. HIGH 792 4,083,704 190,893 514,481 4,789,078 6001061 CLOVERDALE JR. HIGH 609 2,745,368 166,235 419,647 3,331,250 6001062 MABELVALE JR. HIGH 491 2,709,578 121,504 269,338 3,100,420 TOTAL EXPENSE I 5,623 I 24,530,299 1,178,756 6,833,150 32,542,205 SOURCES: See note section for Cost Per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 620 FY 95/96 6,113 5,489 5,709 5,546 5,656 6,047 5,470 6,315 5,787 LEA# 6001001 6001002 6001005 6001063 6001064 N/A I SOURCES: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAMS FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; COST PER STU SCHOOL @ 10/01/95 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL CENTRAL HIGH 1,591 7,536,213 198,385 743,676 8,478,274 HALL HIGH 928 4,923,315 115,714 416,156 5,455,185 PARKVIEW HIGH 855 1,354,626 106,612 4,082,094 5,543,332 JA FAIR HIGH 905 4,521,306 112,846 443,824 5,077,976 MCCLELLAN HIGH 904 4,833,274 112,721 482,015 5,428,010 METRO HIGH N/A 1,499,733 22,790 0 1,522,523 TOT AL EXPENSE I 5,183 I 24,668,467 669,068 6,167,765 31,505,300 See note section for Cost Per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 621 FY 95/96 5,329 5,878 6,483 5,611 6,004 N/A 6,079 I LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CYCLE 1 SCHOOL TEACHER \u0026amp; ADMINISTRATOR EXPENSE LEA# 6001005 6001023 6001024 6001030 6001038 6001044 6001047 6001052 6001055 6001063 FY 95/96 TEACHER ADMINISTRATOR SCHOOL SALARIES SALARIES PARKVlEW HIGH 2,229,182 224,797 FAIR PARK ELEM 625,035 50,210 FOREST PARK ELEM 732,541 57,412 JEFFERSON ELEM 981,331 100,441 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM 706,709 48,690 WILSON ELEM 870,632 46,181 TERRY ELEM 919,575 91,081 BASELINE ELEM 573,244 56,824 DAVID O'DODD ELEM 597,053 53,392 JA FAIR HIGH 2,135,807 200,309 TOTAL II 10,371,109 I 929,337 Total district expense for teacher and school site administrator salaries for FY 95/96 was $62,739,208 or 44.0 percent of total expense for FY 95/96 of $142,640,518. Teacher Expense FY 95196 Teacher salary expense for each Cycle 1 school for FY 95/96. Administrator Expense I FY 95196 Administrator salary expense for each Cycle 1 school for FY 95/96. Total Category TOTAL 2,453,979 675,245 789,953 1,081,772 755,399 916,813 1,010,656 630,068 650,445 2,336,116 11,300,446 FY 95/96 The totals in this column represent the total teacher and administrator expense for each Cycle 1 school for FY 95/96. SOURCE: The Little Rock School District Finance Office. 622 e . LRSD PROGRAM COST FY 96/97 623 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT TOT AL PROGRAM OPERA TING BUDGET FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES LOCAL/STATE FEDERAL LEA# SCHOOL PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS LEGAL PROGRAM DISTRICT PROGRAM DISTRICT 6001 001 CENTRAL HIGH 5,746,846 2.410.490 441 ,679 16,121 0 301.537 52,464 693,236 6001002 HALL HIGH 3,782,965 1,116 395 204 559 7,466 0 139.654 0 321 ,066 6001003 MANN JR HIGH 0 1,158 4  6 212,264 7,747 0 14  . 914 0 333,159 6001005 PARKVIEW HIGH 0 1,192 358 218,478 7,974 0 149.157 0 342,912 6001006 BOOKER ELEM 0 817,966 149,878 5,470 0 102 323 0 235.240 6001007 DUNBAR JR HIGH 2,532,629 1,051 283 192,629 7,031 7,897 131 ,509 197,727 302,340 6001009 FOREST HEIGHTS JR HIGH 2,656,647 854 ,591 156,589 5,715 31 ,153 106,904 198,760 245,773 6001010 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR HIGH 2,780.689 1,064,848 195,114 7.122 0 133.206 106,931 306,241 6001011 SOUTHWEST JR HIGH 2,132 228 805.758 147,641 5,389 37.239 100.795 195,680 231 ,729 6001013 HENDERSON JR HIGH 3,141 ,993 1,005.162 184,178 6,722 40.678 125,740 146 198 289 ,076 6001 017 BALE ELEM 1,154,155 459 .652 84,260 3,075 46,765 57,525 153,635 132,249 6001016 BRADY ELEM 1,177,507 478,642 87,739 3,202 44 ,553 59 900 104,058 137,711 6001020 MCDERMOTT ELEM 1,519,141 663 ,326 121 ,543 4,436 39,207 82.978 22,193 190,767 6001021 CARVER ELEM 0 819,322 150,126 5,480 0 102,492 0 235,630 6001023 FAIR PARK ELEM 892,836 297 072 54 433 1,987 37,074 37.162 93 101 85,435 6001024 FOREST PARK ELEM 1,311 ,562 609.066 111 ,600 4,073 35,454 76,190 33,391 175.162 6001025 FRANKLIN ELEM 0 515,468 94 450 3,447 87 199 64 ,482 0 148,244 6001026 GARLAND ELEM 0 351 ,332 64 375 2,350 241 ,424 43.949 0 101 040 6001027 GIBBS ELEM 0 423 .226 77,549 2,830 0 52.943 0 121,716 6001029 WESTERN HILLS ELEM 1,073,033 423,226 77 ,549 2,831 32,041 52.943 23,866 121 ,716 6001030 JEFFERSON ELEM 1,653,192 674 ,178 123,531 4,509 82,376 84,335 34,791 193,888 6001033 MEAOOWCLIFF ELEM 1,215.474 505,972 92,710 3,384 69,707 63,294 32,971 145,513 6001034 MITCHELL ELEM 0 330 985 60.647 2 214 41 .749 41 ,404 0 95,188 6001035 ML KING ELEM 62,245 747 .428 136,953 4 999 38,876 93 499 2 176,308 214 ,954 6001038 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM 1,280,928 615,848 112,843 4 119 599 206 77.039 26,436 177,113 6001039 RIGHTSELL ELEM 0 309,261 56,670 2,068 36,412 36.669 0 88 ,947 6001040 ROMINE ELEM 1,203,291 363,540 66,612 2,431 40,940 45,477 147,791 104,551 6001042 WASHINGTON ELEM 2,298.859 889,860 163.051 5,951 157.794 111 .316 366,420 255,916 6001043 WILLIAMS ELEM 0 679,604 124.525 4,545 0 65,014 0 195,448 6001044 WILSON ELEM 1,352,091 466,634 85,502 3.121 65,397 58,373 63,793 134,200 6001045 WOODRUFF ELEM 803,753 314,707 57,664 2,105 39,643 39,368 112,848 90,507 6001047 TERRY ELEM 1,638,552 698,595 128,005 4,672 0 87 390 39,277 200,910 6001048 FULBRIGHT ELEM 1,829,125 676,247 124,277 4,536 37.170 64 .845 36,996 195,056 6001050 ROCKEFELLER ELEM 0 457,139 83,762 3,057 161 ,155 57,185 0 131 ,469 6001051 BADGETT ELEM 763,484 255,021 46 728 1,706 44 ,509 31 902 124 291 73.342 6001052 BASELINE ELEM 962,347 360,827 66,115 2,413 66,103 45,137 140.736 103,771 6001053 CHICOT ELEM 1,801 ,817 653,830 119,803 4,373 76,969 61 790 174,079 166,036 6001054 CLOVERDALE ELEM 1,264,299 629,413 115,329 4 209 67,313 78.736 168,664 181 ,014 6001055 DAVID 0'0000 ELEM 925,551 328,272 60,150 2 195 10,779 41 065 42,887 94,408 6001056 GEYER SPRINGS ELEM 840,977 371 .679 68,104 2,466 40 156 46,495 129,590 106,892 6001057 MABELVALE ELEM 1,260,295 543.954 99,670 3,638 109,696 68 045 102,483 156,437 6001058 OTTER CREEK ELEM 1,089,943 420,513 77,052 2,812 37,492 52 604 22 .476 120,936 6001059 WAKEFIELD ELEM 1,335,727 591 ,431 108,369 3,955 327.778 73,984 26,649 170,091 6001060 WATSON ELEM 1,299,044 600,927 110,109 4,019 38,867 75.172 152,372 172.821 6001061 CLOVERDALE JR HIGH 2,072,506 866,600 158,826 5,797 62,759 106,431 219,833 249,284 6001062 MABELVALE JR HIGH 2,235,568 634,839 116,323 4,246 20,670 79.415 45,350 182,574 6001063 JAFAIR HIGH 3,383,370 1,124,534 206,051 7,521 0 140,672 47,059 323,406 6001064 MCCLELLAN HIGH 3,868,990 1,256,114 230.160 8,401 0 157,132 112,171 361 ,248 NIA METRO HIGH 1,475,600 0 0 0 76.908 0 0 0 NIA ALT LEARNING CTR 75,772 0 0 0 0 0 532,484 0 NIA ISH ELEM 14,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOT AL PROGRAM BUDGET 67,909,531 32,888,201 6,026.174 219,950 3,053.330 4,114,111 6,449,163 9,458,364 The district for the first quarter of FY 96/97 has incurred expenses totaling $20,609,842 or 13.0 percent of their total FY 96/97 budget. SOURCE SH th not section on th next page for expl1natlons of the categories. The Little Rock School DislT/ct Finenctt Otrice 624 DESEGREGATION MAGNET INCENTIVE TRANS LEGAL TOTAL 0 0 211 ,583 14.296 9,888,252 0 0 97 .993 6.621 5,676,719 3,808,689 0 101 ,684 6,870 5,773,773 4,357,849 0 104,660 7,072 6,380 460 2,814,752 0 71 ,798 4,851 4,202.278 0 0 92,277 6,235 4,521 ,557 0 0 75 ,013 5,068 4,336,213 0 0 93,468 6,315 4,693 934 0 0 70,726 4,779 3,731 ,964 0 0 88 ,229 5,961 5,033,937 0 0 40,364 2.727 2.134,807 0 0 42 ,031 2,840 2,138,383 0 0 58,224 3,934 2,705,749 2,530,286 0 71 ,917 4,859 3,920,112 0 0 26,076 1 762 1 526,938 0 0 53,461 3,612 2,413,571 0 2,240,116 45,246 3,057 3,201 ,709 0 1,482,591 30,838 2.084 2,319,983 1,611 ,483 0 37,149 2,510 2,329,406 0 0 37,149 2,510 1,846,864 0 0 59 .177 3,998 2,913,975 0 0 44 ,412 3,001 2,176.438 0 1,359,797 29,052 1,963 1,962,999 0 0 65,606 4  33 3,545,301 0 0 54 ,057 3,652 2,951 ,243 0 1.268,129 27 .147 1,834 1,629,177 0 0 31 ,910 2,156 2,008,699 0 0 78,108 5,277 4,352,552 2,238,407 0 59,653 4,031 3,391 .227 0 0 40,959 2,767 2,292,637 0 0 27 .624 1,866 1,490,285 0 0 61 ,320 4,143 2,862,864 0 0 59,534 4,023 3,053,811 0 2,288,277 40,126 2,711 3,244,881 0 0 22,385 1,513 1,364,861 0 0 31 ,672 2,140 1 781 ,263 0 0 57,391 3 ,878 3,163,966 0 0 55,247 3,733 2,567,957 0 0 28,614 1,947 1,536,068 0 0 32,624 2,204 1,641 ,207 0 0 47,746 3,226 2,395,192 0 0 36,911 2,494 1,863,233 0 0 51 ,913 3,508 2,695,605 0 0 52.747 3,564 2,509,642 0 0 76,084 5,141 3,825.461 0 0 55,724 3,765 3,378,474 0 0 98,707 6,669 5,337,989 0 0 110,257 7,450 6,111 ,923 0 0 0 0 1,552,508 0 0 0 0 608,256 0 0 0 0 14,500 17,361 ,466 8,638,910 2,886,793 195,050 159,201 .043 NOTES FOR LRSD TOTAL PROGRAM OPERATING BUDGET SCHEDULE FOR FY 96/97 Funding Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. This category consists of funding for desegregation purposes. Expense Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg Total Category FY 96197 SOURCE: This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to regular program expense, district expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded by unrestricted local, state and federal sources. This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to federal program expense and district expense funded by restricted federal sources. This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to desegregation program expense, district expense, magnet expense, incentive expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded from desegregation sources. The totals in this column represent the total budget for each school site for fiscal year 1996/1997. The Little Rock School District Finance Office. 625 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CYCLE 1 SCHOOL PROGRAM OPERATING BUDGET FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES LOCAUSTATE FEDERAL DESEGREGATION LEA# SCHOOL PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS LEGAL PROGRAM DISTRICT PROGRAM DISTRICT MAGNET INCENTIVE 6001005 PARKVIEW HIGH 0 1,192,358 218,478 7,974 0 149,157 0 342,912 4,357,849 0 6001023 FAIR PARK ELEM 892,836 297,072 54,433 1,987 37,074 37,162 93,101 85,435 0 0 6001024 FOREST PARK ELEM 1,311 ,562 609,066 111,600 4,073 35,454 76,190 33,391 175,162 0 0 6001030 JEFFERSON ELEM 1,653,192 674,178 123,531 4,509 82,376 84,335 34,791 193,888 0 0 6001038 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM 1,280,928 615,848 112,843 4,119 599,206 77,039 26,438 177,113 0 0 6001044 WILSON ELEM 1,352,091 466,634 85,502 3,121 65,397 58,373 83,793 134,200 0 0 6001047 TERRY ELEM 1,838,552 698,595 128,005 4,672 0 87,390 39,277 200,910 0 0 6001052 BASELINE ELEM 962,347 360,827 66,115 2,413 66,103 45,137 140,738 103,771 0 0 6001055 DAVID 0 '0000 ELEM 925,551 328,272 60,150 2,195 10,779 41 ,065 42,887 94,408 0 0 6001063 JA FAIR HIGH 3,383,370 1,124,534 206,051 7,521 0 140,672 47,059 323,406 0 0 TOTAL CYCLE 1 PROGRAM BUDGET 13,400,429 6,367,384 1 166,708 42,584 896,389 796,520 541 ,475 1,831 ,205 4,357,849 0 OURCE: The district's Total Program Budget for the fiscal year 96/971s $159,201,043. The programs funded In each of the Cycle 1 schools are Indicated on the chart entitled \"Programs In Cycle 1 Schools.\" See note section for Total Program Operating Budget for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories and totals. The Little Rock School District Finance Office. 626 TRANS LEGAL TOTAL 104,660 7,072 6,380,460 26,076 1,762 1,526,938 53,461 3,612 2,413,571 59,177 3,998 2,913,975 54,057 3,652 2,951 ,243 40,959 2,767 2,292,837 61 ,320 4,143 2,862,864 31 ,672 2,140 1,781 ,263 28,814 1,947 1,536,068 98,707 6,669 5,337,989 558,903 37,762 29,997,208 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Programs in Cycle 1 Schools FY 96/97 PARKVIEW FAIR PARK FOREST JEFFERSON PULASKI WILSON TERRY BASELINE DAVIDO DODD JA FAIR PROGRAMS HIGH ELEM PARK ELEM ELEM HGTS ELEM ELEM ELEM ELEM ELEM HIGH Four-Year Old X X X Kindergarten X X X X X X X X X X Elementary X X X X X X X X Elementary Music X X X X X X X X Itinerant Instruction X X X X X X X X Resource Room X X X X X X X X X X Special Class X X X Homebound \u0026amp; Hospital X X X X X Gifted \u0026amp; Talented X X X X X X X X Guidance Services X X X X X X X X X X Library Services X X X X X X X X X X High School X X Marketing/District Ed-Coop X Business Ed-Coop X Business Ed- Skill Training X X Trade \u0026amp; Ind-Coop X X Trade \u0026amp; lnd-Expl X X ons/Homemaking X mp Ed X Coord Career-Coop X . SOURCE: ThtJ Little Rock School District FinanctJ OtrictJ. 627 LEAi 6001001 6001002 6001003 6001005 6001006 6001007 6001009 6001010 6001011 6001013 6001017 6001018 6001020 6001021 6001023 6001024 6001025 6001026 6001027 6001029 6001030 6001033 6001034 6001035 6001038 6001039 6001040 6001042 6001043 6001044 6001045 6001047 6001048 6001050 6001051 6001052 6001053 6001054 6001055 6001056 6001057 6001058 6001059 6001060 6001061 6001062 6001063 6001064 NIA NIA NIA SOURCE: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR TOTAL PROGRAMS FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; SCHOOL @ 10/01/96 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL CENTRAL HIGH 1,777 8,615,136 301,537 971,579 9,888,252 HALL HIGH 823 5,111,385 139,654 425,680 5,676,719 MANN JR. HIGH 854 1,378,457 144,914 4,250,402 5,TT3,TT3 PARKVIEW HIGH 879 1,418,810 149,157 4,812,493 6,380,460 BOOKER ELEM 603 973,314 102,323 3,126 641 4,202,278 DUNBAR JR. HIGH ns 3,783,572 139,406 598,579 4,521,557 FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 630 3,673,542 138,057 524,614 4,336,213 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 785 4,047,773 133,206 512,955 4,693,934 SOUTHWEST JR. HIGH 594 3,091,016 138,034 502,914 3,731,964 HENDERSON JR. HIGH 741 4,338,055 166,418 529,464 5,033,937 BALE ELEM 339 1,701,342 104,290 329,175 2,134,807 BRADY ELEM 353 1,747,290 104,453 286,640 2,138,383 MCDERMOTT ELEM 489 2,308,446 122,185 275,118 2,705,749 CARVER ELEM 604 974,928 102,492 2,842,692 3,920,112 FAIR PARK ELEM 219 1,246,328 74,236 206,374 1,526,938 FOREST PARK ELEM 449 2,036,301 111,644 265,626 2,413,571 FRANKLIN ELEM 380 613,365 151,681 2,436,663 3,201,709 GARLAND ELEM 259 418,057 285,373 1,616,553 2,319,983 GIBBS ELEM 312 503,605 52,943 1,TT2,858 2,329,406 WESTERN HILLS ELEM 312 1,576,639 84,984 185,241 1,846,864 JEFFERSON ELEM 497 2,455,410 166,711 291,854 2,913,975 MEAOOWCLIFF ELEM 373 1,817,540 133,001 225,897 2,176,438 MITCHELL ELEM 244 393,846 83,153 1,486,000 1,962,999 ML KING ELEM 551 951,625 132,375 2,461,301 3,545,301 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM 454 2,013,738 676,245 261,260 2,951,243 RIGHTSELL ELEM 228 368,019 75,101 1,386,057 1,829,177 ROMINE ELEM 268 1,635,874 86,417 286,408 2,008,699 WASHINGTON ELEM 656 3,357,721 269,110 725,721 4,352,552 WILLIAMS ELEM 501 808,674 85,014 2,497,539 3,391,227 WILSON ELEM 344 1,907,348 123,770 261,719 2,292,837 WOODRUFF ELEM 232 1,178,229 79,211 232,845 1,490,285 TERRY ELEM 515 2,469,824 87,390 305,650 2,862,864 FULBRIGHT ELEM 500 2,636,185 122,015 295,611 3,053,811 ROCKEFELLER ELEM 337 543,958 238,340 2,462,583 3,244,881 BADGETT ELEM 188 1,066,939 76,411 221,531 1,364,881 BASELINE ELEM 266 1,391,702 111,240 278,321 1,781,263 CHICOT ELEM 482 2,579,823 160,779 423,384 3,163,986 CLOVERDALE ELEM 464 2,013,250 146,049 408,658 2,567,957 DAVID 0'0000 ELEM 242 1,316,168 51,844 168,056 1,536,068 GEYER SPRINGS ELEM 274 1,283,246 86,651 271,310 1,641,207 MABELVALE ELEM 401 1,907,557 177,743 309,892 2,395,192 OTTER CREEK ELEM 310 1,590,320 90,096 182,817 1,863,233 WAKEFIELD ELEM 436 2,039,482 401,762 254,361 2,695,605 WATSON ELEM 443 2 014,099 114,039 381,504 2,509,642 CLOVERDALE JR. HIGH 639 3,103,929 171,190 550,342 3,825,461 MABELVALE JR. HIGH 468 2,990,976 100,085 287,413 3,378,474 JA FAIR HIGH 829 4,721,476 140,672 475,841 5,337,989 MCCLELLAN HIGH 926 5,363,665 157,132 591,126 6,111,923 METRO HIGH NIA 1,475,600 76,908 0 1,552,508 ALT LEARNING CTR NIA 75,772 0 532,484 608,256 ISH ELEM NIA 14,500 0 0 14,500 TOTAL BUDGET 24,245 107,043,856 7,167,441 44,989,746 159,201,043 The district for the first quarter of FY 96/97 has incurred expenses totaling $20,609,842 or 13.0 percent of their total FY 96/97 budget. See the note section on the next page for explanations of the categories. The Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 628 COST PER STU FY 96/97 5,565 6,898 6,761 7,259 6,969 5,834 6,883 5,980 6,283 6,793 6,297 6,058 5,533 6,490 6,972 5,375 8,426 8,957 7,466 5,919 5,863 5,835 8,045 6,434 6,501 8,023 7,495 6,635 6,769 6,665 6,424 5,559 6,108 9,629 7,260 6,696 6,564 5,534 6,347 5,990 5,973 6,010 6,183 5,665 5,987 7,219 6,439 6,600 NIA NIA NIA 6,566 NOTES FOR LRSD COST PER STUDENT FOR TOTAL PROGRAMS FOR FY 96/97 Funding Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. This category consists of funding for desegregation purposes. Expense Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg Total Category FY96197 This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to regular programs funded by unrestricted local, state and federal sources. This category consists of budgeted expenses funded by restricted federal sources. This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to desegregation programs funded from desegregation sources. The totals in this column represent the total budget for each school site for fiscal year 1996/1997. Cost Per Student Category FY 96197 SOURCE: The cost per student figures were calculated by dividing the school's total budget for FY 96/97 by their enrollment as of October 1, 1996. The Lfttle Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 629 LEA# 6001005 6001023 6001024 6001030 6001038 6001044 6001047 6001052 6001055 6001063 I SOURCE: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR CYCLE 1 SCHOOL PROGRAMS FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; [\nJ SCHOOL @ 10/01/96 STATE FEDERAL DESEG PARKVIEW HIGH 879 1,418,810 149,157 4,812,493 6,380,460 FAIR PARK ELEM 219 1,246,328 74,236 206,374 1,526,938 FOREST PARK ELEM 449 2,036,301 111 ,644 265,626 2,413,571 JEFFERSON ELEM 497 2,455,410 166,711 291 ,854 2,913,975 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM 454 2,013,738 676,245 261 ,260 2,951 ,243 WILSON ELEM 344 1,907,348 123.770 261 ,719 2,292,837 TERRY ELEM 515 2,469,824 87,390 305,650 2,862,864 BASELINE ELEM 266 1,391.702 111 ,240 278,321 1,781 ,263 DAVID O'DODD ELEM 242 1,316,168 51 ,844 168,056 1,536,068 JA FAIR HIGH 829 4,721,476 140,672 475,841 5,337,989 TOT AL BUDGET I 4,694 I 20,977,105 1,692,909 7,327,194 29,997,208 See note section for Cost per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 630 COST PER STU FY 96/97 7,259 6,972 5,375 5,863 6,501 6,665 5,559 6,696 6,347 6,439 I 6,391 I LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT BY PROGRAM FY 96/97 PERCENT AVG COST DISTRICT VARIANCE PROGRAM OF PER STUDENT AVG COST OVER DIST AVG/ SCHOOL PROGRAM BUDGET TOTAL BUDGET BY PROGRAM PER STUDENT (UNDER DIST AVG) ELEMENTARY PROGRAMS 88,957,879 55.9% 6,577 6,566 11 JR. HIGH PROGRAMS 35,295,313 22.1% 6,434 6,566 (133) HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAMS 34,947,851 22.0% 6,677 6,566 111 LRSD PROGRAM COST LRSD COST PER STUDENT 100000000 80000000 60000000 40000000 20000000 0 PROGRAM COST FY 96/97 PERCENT OF TOTAL COST AVG COST PER STUDENT BY PROGRAM 6700 6600 6500 6400 FY 96/97 Program costs consist of the total budget for F { 96197 for the indicated category of school programs. The percentage of program budget to the total district budget of $159,201,043 for FY 96/97. The total program budget for FY 96/97 to the total number of students in the program category as of October 1, 1996. DISTRICT AVG COST PER STU The total budget for FY 96/97 of $159,201 , 043 to the total enrollment at October 1, 1996 of 24,245. VARIANCE SOURCE: The difference between the cost per student by program and the district average cost per student. A positive variance indicates the cost per student by program Is greater than the district cost per student, and a negative variance 1nd1cates the cost per student by program Is less than the district cost per student The LiN/e Rock School O,stnct Finance Office 631 LEA# 6001006 600101 7 6001018 6001020 6001021 6001023 6001024 6001025 6001026 6001027 6001029 6001030 6001033 6001034 6001035 6001038 6001039 6001040 6001042 6001043 6001044 6001045 6001047 6001048 6001050 6001051 6001052 6001053 6001054 6001055 6001056 6001057 6001058 6001059 6001060 N/A NIA SOURCE: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR ELEMENTARY PROGRAMS FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; SCHOOL @ 10/01 /96 STATE FEDERAL DESEG BOOKER ELEM 603 973,314 102,323 3,126,641 BALE ELEM 339 1 701 ,342 104,290 329,175 BRADY ELEM 353 1,747,290 104,453 286,640 MCDERMOTT ELEM 489 2,308,446 122,185 275,118 CARVER ELEM 604 974,928 102,492 2,842,692 FAIR PARK ELEM 219 1 246,328 74,236 206,374 FOREST PARK ELEM 449 2,036,301 111 644 265,626 FRANKLIN ELEM 380 613,365 151 ,681 2,436,663 GARLAND ELEM 259 418,057 285,373 1,616,553 GIBBS ELEM 312 503,605 52,943 1,772,858 WESTERN HILLS ELEM 312 1,576,639 84,984 185,241 JEFFERSON ELEM 497 2,455,410 166,711 291 ,854 MEADOWCLIFF ELEM 373 1,817,540 133,001 225,897 MITCHELL ELEM 244 393,846 83,153 1,486,000 ML KING ELEM 551 951 ,625 132,375 2,461 ,301 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM 454 2,013 738 676,245 261 ,260 RIGHTSELL ELEM 228 368 019 75,101 1,386,057 ROMINE ELEM 268 1,635,874 86,417 286,408 WASHINGTON ELEM 656 3,357,721 269,110 725,721 WILLIAMS ELEM 501 808,674 85,014 2,497,539 WILSON ELEM 344 1 907,348 123,770 261 ,719 WOODRUFF ELEM 232 1,178,229 79,211 232,845 TERRY ELEM 515 2,469,824 87,390 305,650 FULBRIGHT ELEM 500 2,636,185 122,015 295,611 ROCKEFELLER ELEM 337 543,958 238,340 2,462,583 BADGETT ELEM 188 1,066 939 76,411 221 ,531 BASELINE ELEM 266 1,391 ,702 111 ,240 278,321 CHICOT ELEM 482 2,579 823 160,779 423 384 CLOVERDALE ELEM 464 2,013,250 146,049 408,658 DAVID 0'0000 ELEM 242 1,316,168 51 ,844 168,056 GEYER SPRINGS ELEM 274 1,283,246 86,651 271 ,310 MABELVALE ELEM 401 1,907,557 177,743 309,892 OTTER CREEK ELEM 310 1,590,320 90,096 182,817 WAKEFIELD ELEM 436 2,039,482 401,762 254,361 WATSON ELEM 443 2,014,099 114,039 381 ,504 ALT LEARNING CTR NIA 75,772 0 532,484 ISH ELEM NIA 14,500 0 0 TOTAL BUDGET 13,525 53,930,464 5,071 ,071 29,956,344 See note section for Cost per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. TOTAL 4,202,278 2,134,807 2,138,383 2,705,749 3,920,112 1,526 938 2,413,571 3,201 ,709 2,319,983 2,329,406 1,846,864 2,913,975 2,176,438 1,962,999 3,545,301 2,951 ,243 1,829,177 2,008,699 4,352,552 3,391 ,227 2,292,837 1,490,285 2,862,864 3,053,811 3,244,881 1,364,881 1,781 ,263 3,163,986 2,567,957 1,536,068 1,641 ,207 2,395,192 1,863,233 2,695,605 2,509,642 608,256 14,500 88,957,879 The Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 632 COST PER STU FY 96/97 6,969 6,297 6,058 5,533 6,490 6,972 5,375 8,426 8,957 7,466 5,919 5,863 5,835 8,045 6,434 6,501 8,023 7,495 6,635 6,769 6,665 6,424 5,559 6,108 9,629 7,260 6,696 6,564 5,534 6,347 5,990 5,973 6,010 6,183 5,665 NIA NIA 6,577 LEA# 6001003 6001007 6001009 6001010 6001011 6001013 6001061 6001062 I SOURCE: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR JR HIGH PROGRAMS FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES I I ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; [\n] SCHOOL @ 10/01/96 STATE FEDERAL DESEG MANN JR. HIGH 854 1,378,457 144,914 4,250,402 5,773,773 DUNBAR JR. HIGH 775 3,783,572 139,406 598,579 4,521,557 FOREST HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 630 3,673,542 138,057 524,614 4,336,213 PULASKI HEIGHTS JR. HIGH 785 4,047,773 133,206 512,955 4,693,934 SOUTHWEST JR. HIGH 594 3,091,016 138,034 502,914 3,731,964 HENDERSON JR. HIGH 741 4,338,055 166,418 529,464 5,033,937 CLOVERDALE JR. HIGH 639 3,103,929 171,190 550,342 3,825,461 MABELVALE JR. HIGH 468 2,990,976 100,085 287,413 3,378,474 TOTAL BUDGET I 5,486 I 26,407,320 1,131,310 7,756,683 35,295,313 See note section for Cost per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 633 COST PER STU FY 96/97 6,761 5,834 6,883 5,980 6,283 6,793 5,987 7,219 6,434 LEA# 6001001 6001002 6001005 6001063 6001064 N/A I SOURCE: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAMS FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES I ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; SCHOOL @10/01/96 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL CENTRAL HIGH 1,777 8,615,136 301,537 971,579 9,888,252 HALL HIGH 823 5,111,385 139,654 425,680 5,676,719 PARKVIEW HIGH 879 1,418,810 149,157 4,812,493 6,380,460 JA FAIR HIGH 829 4,721,476 140,672 475,841 5,337,989 MCCLELLAN HIGH 926 5,363,665 157,132 591,126 6,111,923 METRO HIGH N/A 1,475,600 76,908 0 1,552,508 TOTAL BUDGET I 5,234 I 26,706,072 965,060 7,276,719 34,947,851 See note section for Cost per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 634 I COST PER STU FY 96/97 5,565 6,898 7,259 6,439 6,600 N/A 6,677 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CYCLE 1 SCHOOL TEACHER \u0026amp; ADMINISTRATOR BUDGET FY 96/97 LEA# SCHOOL TEACHER SALARIES ADMINISTRATOR SALARIES 6001005 PARKVIEW HIGH 2,283,538 228,084 6001023 FAIR PARK ELEM 552,475 50,108 6001024 FOREST PARK ELEM 811,654 59,778 6001030 JEFFERSON ELEM 1,026,676 104,844 6001038 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEM 773,251 50,841 6001044 WILSON ELEM 888,517 45,990 6001047 TERRY ELEM 982,833 96,083 6001052 BASELINE ELEM 568,672 59,163 6001055 DAVID O'DODD ELEM 543,994 53,307 6001063 JAFAIR HIGH 2,076,618 192,889 TOTAL BUDGET 10,508,228 941,087 Teacher Budget FY 96197 The district's total teacher and school site administrator salary expense for the first quarter of FY 96/97 totaled $6,655,050 or 32.3 percent of the district's total expense for the same time period of $20,609,842. Total district expense for teacher and school site administrator salaries for FY 96/97 is budgeted at $65,272,421 or 41.0 percent of the total budget for FY 96/97 of $159,201,043. Teacher salary budget for each Cycle 1 school for FY 96/97. Administrator Budget TOTAL 2,511,622 602,583 871,432 1,131,520 824,092 934,507 1,078,916 627,835 597,301 2,269,507 11,449,315 FY 96197 School site administrator salary budget for each Cycle 1 school for FY 96/97. Total Category FY 96197 e . SOURCE: The totals in this column represent the total teacher and administrator budget for each Cycle 1 school for fiscal year 1996/1997. The Little Rock School District Finance Office. 635 NLRSD PROGRAM COST FY 95/96 636    F . BUDGET INFORMATION 1. Cost of operating all elementary programs, junior high school programs, and high school programs by funding source (local/regular state/federal and special state desegregation funding). North Little Rock School District (NLRSD) The following is a summary of the NLRSD Program Cost Section of the February 1, 1997 Monitoring Report. Total program expense for the district is separated by funding source and expense category within the funding source. Total program expense is actual for FY 95/96 and budgeted for FY 96/97. Separate schedules indicate the total program expense for the Cycle 1 schools. The programs funded by the Cycle l schools are also included. Teacher expense and school administrator expense are also presented for the Cycle 1 schools. Cost per student information is presented for the: district~ elementary school programs~ junior high school programs\nhigh school programs\nand Cycle 1 school programs. Total Operating Expenses The district's total operating expenses for FY 95/96 were $45,497,622 or an increase of3.6 percent over FY 94/95 expenses of$43,931,450. The district's total operating expenses for FY 96/97 are budgeted at $53,883,330 which is an increase of 18.4 percent. Elementary school operating co ts ro e from $22,125,861 in FY 94/95 to $24,007,591 in FY 95/96. Operating co t for elementary chool are budgeted to rise an additional $4,219,077 in FY 96/97 to $28,226,66 . Operating co t for junior high school increa ed from $7,512,8 0 in FY 94/95 to $7,690,795 in FY 95/96. The junior high chool operating co t for FY 96/97 i budget d to increase 21.3 percent to $9,330,107. Operating co t for high chool decrea ed from 14,292,709 in FY 94/95 to 13,799,236 in FY 95/96  The o t for p rating high chool are budg ted to rncrea 18 3 p rcent in FY 96/97 to $16, 26, 55 OUR E The orth Little Ro -k School n,.,trict Finance (Hfice, the Al I~ General 1'i11wu:, ~\\'ect1011, and the Al 1~ Local Fiscal~ 'ervices Sectw11. 637    F . BUDGET INFORMATION (Continued) 1. Cost of operating all elementary programs junior high school programs, and high school programs by funding source (local/regular state/federal and special state desegregation funding). (Continued) orth Little Rock School District (NLRSD) (Continued) Enrollment Total district enrollment as of October 1, 1995 declined by 155 students or 1. 7 percent in FY 95/96 for a total enrollment of 8,802 as compared with total enrollment as of October 1, 1994 of 8,957. Total enrollment for FY 96/97 increased to 8,966 as of October 1, 1996. Enrollment in the district's elementary chools decreased from 4,807 as of October 1, 1994 to 4,789 or 0.4 percent in FY 95/96 as of October 1, 1995 . Elementary school enrollment decreased in FY 96/97 to 4,773 as of October 1, 1996. Junior high school enrollment declined by 27 students from 1,479 in FY 94/95 to 1,452 or 1.8 percent in FY 95/96. Junior high school enrollment in FY 96/97 increased as of October 1, 1996 to 1,476 . Enrollment in the district's high schools declined in FY 95/96 from 2,671 as of October 1, 1994 to 2,561 or 4.1 percent as of October I, l 995. High school enrollment increased in FY 96/97 to 2,717 as of October 1, 1996. Cost per Student Rate The district's cost per student rate increased from $4,905 in FY 94/95 to $5,169 in FY 95/96 resulting in an overall cost per student increase of 5 .4 percent. The cost per student rate is budgeted to increase 16.3 percent in FY 96/97 to $6,010. The elementary cost per student rate increased in FY 95/96 from $4,603 in FY 94/95 to $5,0 I 3 or 8. 9 percent in FY 95/96. The elementary cost per student rate is budgeted to increase an additional 18.0 percent in FY 96/97 to $5,914. The junior high cost per student rate increased 4.3 percent in FY 95/96 from $5,080 in FY 94/95 to $5,297 in FY 95/96. The junior high cost per student rate is budgeted to increase to $6,321 in FY 96/97. SOURCES: The North Little Rock School District Finance q[/ice, the ADE General hnance ,Section, and the ADJ!.\nLocal Fiscal Services Section. 638    F . BUDGET INFORMATION (Continued) 1. Cost of operating all elementary programs, junior high school programs, and high school programs by funding source (local/regular state/federal and special state desegregation funding). (Continued) North Little Rock School District (NLRSD) (Continued) Cost per Student Rate (Continued) The high school cost per student rate increased from $5,351 in FY 94/95 to $5,388 in FY 95/96. The high school cost per student rate is budgeted to increase an additional 11. 5 percent in FY 96/97 to $6,009. Desegregation Expense The district's desegregation costs for FY 95/96 were $2,124,324. The district received desegregation funding from the ADE in FY 95/96 as stipulated in the Settlement Agreement totaling $1,556,119. The district has budgeted $1,603 938 in total desegregation expense for FY 96/97. The district should receive approximately $1,785,092 in FY 96/97 in de egregation funding from the ADE. Of the amount expected to be received by the di trict in FY 96/97, only $1,488,072 of the total amount relates to expen es for FY 96/97 because the district was reimbursed $297,020 in FY 96/97 for desegregation transportation expenses incurred from FY 91/92 through FY 95/96. All of the information received from the LR D has been reconciled for accuracy and reliability with no exceptions noted. The di trict i utilizing the fund received from the ADE in accordance with the ettlement Agreement for desegregation purpo es OURCES: 77,e North Little Rock School District N11a11ce qf(ice, the Al 1~ General Finance Section, and the ADI~ Local Ftscal Sen ices Sec/l(m . 639 LEA# 6002050 6002053 6002054 6002055 6002056 6002057 6002058 6002059 6002060 6002061 6002063 6002064 6002065 6002067 6002069 6002070 6002072 6002075 6002076 002077 e 2078 NIA NIA 11 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT TOTAL PROGRAM OPERATING COST LOCAUSTATE SCHOOL PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS AMBOY ELEMENTARY 1,173,309 491,365 63,047 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY 492,610 141,029 18,095 BOONE PARK ELEM 1,142,858 480,172 61,610 CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY 694,330 271,985 34,898 GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY 682,952 233,930 30,015 INDIAN HILLS ELEMENTARY 1,245,767 427,566 54,861 LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY 555,118 250,719 32,170 CENTRAL ELEMENTARY 1,248,444 451,Q70 57,876 LYNCH DRIVE ELEM 1,133,696 486,888 62,472 MEADOW PARK ELEM 646,017 254,077 32,600 N. HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 1,066,474 445,474 57,158 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY 684,568 322,353 41,361 PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY 1,103,469 387,271 49,690 REDWOOD ELEMENTARY 785,594 249,600 32,026 SEVENTH STREET ELEM 1,070,799 421,969 54,142 LAKEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL 1,723,479 542,852 69,653 RIDGEROAD MIDDLE SCHOOL 1,876,488 674,927 86,599 NLR HIGH SCHOOL-EAST 4,485,842 1,452,828 186,411 NLR HIGH SCHOOL-WEST 4,436,039 1,413,653 181,384 ROSE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL 1,609,191 407,419 52,275 BARING CROSS CENTER 347,538 44,771 5,745 SECONDARY ALTERNATIVE 411,646 0 0 ELEMENTARY ALTERNATIVE 451,405 0 0 TOTAL PROGRAM EXPENSE 29,067,633 9,851,918 1,264,088 See the note section on the next page for explanations of the categories. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office. FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES FEDERAL LEGAL PROGRAM DISTRICT 1,096 98,758 59,468 315 18,525 17,068 1,071 233,131 58,114 607 18,179 32,918 522 62,208 28,312 954 130,893 51,747 559 86,188 30,344 1,006 158,962 54,592 1,086 149,869 58,926 567 74,625 30,750 994 104,452 53,914 719 77,647 39,013 864 58,166 46,870 557 117,011 30,208 942 103,698 51,070 1,211 2,719 65,700 1,506 48,903 81,684 3,241 53,588 175,831 3,154 117,359 171,090 909 105,647 49,309 100 82,916 5,419 0 51,707 0 0 20,181 0 21,980 1,975,332 1,192,347 640 DESEGREGATION PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS LEGAL TOTAL 66,150 11,611 15,039 4,906 1,984,749 28,085 3,333 4,317 1,408 724,785 65,288 11,347 14,697 4,794 2,073,082 42,479 6,427 8,325 2,716 1,112,864 50,475 5,528 7,160 2,336 1,103,438 60,320 10,104 13,087 4,269 1,999,568 39,915 5,925 7,674 2,503 1,011,115 62,855 10,659 13,806 4,504 2,063,714 69,349 11,506 14,902 4,861 1,993,! 40,605 6,004 7,777 2,537 1,095,5S9 61,311 10,527 13,635 4,448 1,818,387 48,013 7,617 9,866 3,218 1,234,375 72,041 9,152 11,853 3,867 1,743,24:S 37,453 5,898 7,640 2,492 1,268,479 59,868 9,972 12,915 4,213 1,78 I \u0026amp;.\\ 62,183 12,828 16,615 5,420 2,502, 0 77,128 15,949 20,658 6,739 2,090\n56 180,712 34,332 44,467 14,506 6,8 1,158 229,025 33,406 43,268 14,114 6,842,482 46,638 9,628 12,470 4,068 2,291,5 5,094 1,058 1,370 447 49 ,458 61,633 0 0 0 624, 6 24,986 0 0 0 4 ,r 1,491,606 232,811 301,541 98,366 45.4 1,e22 NOTES FOR NLRSD TOTAL PROGRAM OPERATING COST SCHEDULE FOR FY 95/96 Funding Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg Expense Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg Total Category FY 95196 SOURCE: This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. This category consists of funding for desegregation purposes. This category consists of expenses incurred relative to regular program expense, district expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded by unrestricted local, state and federal sources. This category consists of expenses incurred relative to federal program expense and district expense funded by restricted federal sources. This category consists of expenses incurred relative to desegregation program expense, district expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded from desegregation sources. The totals in this column represent the total expense for each school site for fiscal year 1995/1996. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office. 641 LEA# SCHOOL 6002053 BELWOOD ELEMENT ARY 6002054 BOONE PARK ELEM 6002056 GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY 6002063 N. HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 6002064 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY 6002065 PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY 6002067 REDWOOD ELEMENTARY TOTAL CYCLE 1 PROGRAM EXPENSE NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CYCLE 1 SCHOOL PROGRAM OPERATING COST FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES LOCAUSTATE FEDERAL PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS LEGAL PROGRAM DISTRICT PROGRAM 492,610 141,029 18,095 315 18,525 17,068 28,085 1,142,858 480,172 61,610 1,071 233,131 58,114 65,288 682,952 233,930 30,015 522 62,208 28,312 50,475 1,066,474 445,474 57,158 994 104,452 53,914 61,311 684,568 322,353 41,361 719 77,647 39,013 48,013 1,103,469 387,271 49,690 864 58,166 46,870 72,041 785,594 249,600 32,026 557 117,011 30,208 37,453 5,958,525 2,259,829 289,955 5,042 671,140 273,499 362,666 The district's Total Program Expense for the fiscal year was $45,497,622. The programs funded in each of the Cycle 1 schools are indicated on the chart entitled \"Programs in Cycle 1 Schools.\" DESEGREGATION DISTRICT TRANS 3,333 4,317 11,347 14,697 5,528 7,160 10,527 13,635 7,617 9,866 9,152 11,853 5,898 7,640 53,402 69,168 See the note section for Total Program Operating Cost for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories and totals. SOURCE: The North Little Rock School District Finance Office. 642 LEGAL TOTAL 1,408 724,785 4,794 2,073,082 2,336 1,103,438 4,448 1,818,387 3,218 1,234,375 3,867 1,743,243 2,492 1,268,479 22,563 9,965,768 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Programs in Cycle 1 Schools FY 95/96 BELWOOD BOONE PARK GLENVIEW N. HEIGHTS PARK HILL PIKE VIEW REDWOOD PROGRAMS ELEM ELEM ELEM ELEM ELEM ELEM ELEM Four-Year Old X X Kindergarten X X X X X X X Elementary X X X X X X X Elementary Music X X X X X X X Itinerant Instruction X X X X X X X Resource Room X X X X X X X Special Class X X X X X Homebound \u0026amp; Hospital X X X X X X X Gifted \u0026amp; Talented X X X X X X X Guidance Services X X X X X X X Library Services X X X X X X X SOURCE: The North Little Rock School District Finance Office. 643    - NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DrSTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR TOTAL PROGRAMS FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL\u0026amp; COST PER STU LEAi SCHOOL @ 10/01/95 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL FY 95/96 6002050 AMBOY ELEMENTARY 439 1,728,817 158,226 97,706 1,984,749 4,521 6002053 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY 126 652,049 35,593 37,143 724,785 5,752 6002054 BOONE PARK ELEM 429 1,685,711 291,245 96,126 2,073,082 4,832 6002055 CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY 243 1,001,820 51,097 59,947 1,112,864 4,580 6002056 GLENVIEW ELEMENT ARY 209 947,419 90,520 65,499 1,103,438 5,280 6002057 INDIAN HILLS ELEMENTARY 382 1,729,148 182,640 87,780 1,999,568 5,234 6002058 LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY 224 838,566 116,532 56,017 1,011,115 4,514 6002059 CENTRAL ELEMENTARY 403 1,758,396 213,554 91,824 2,063,774 5,121 6002060 LYNCH DRIVE ELEM 435 1,684,142 208,795 100,618 1,993,555 4,583 6002061 MEADOW PARK ELEM 227 933,261 105,375 56,923 1,095,559 4,826 6002063 N. HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 398 1,570,100 158,366 89,921 1,818,387 4,569 6002064 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY 288 1,049,001 116,660 68,714 1,234,375 4,286 6002065 PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY 346 1,541,294 105,036 96,913 1,743,243 5,038 6002067 REDWOOD ELEMENTARY 223 1,067,777 147,219 53,483 1,268,479 5,688 6002069 SEVENTH STREET ELEM 377 1,547,852 154,768 86,968 1,789,588 4,747 6002070 LAKEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL 485 2,337,195 68,419 97,046 2,502,660 5,160 6002072 RIDGEROAD MIDDLE SCHOOL 603 2,639,520 130,587 120,474 2,890,581 4,794 6002075 NLR HIGH SCHOOL-EAST 1,298 6,128,322 229,419 274,017 6,631,758 5,109 6002076 NLR HIGH SCHOOL-WEST 1,263 6,034,230 288,449 319,813 6,642,492 5,259 6002077 ROSE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL 364 2,069,794 154,956 72,804 2,297,554 6,312 6002078 BARING CROSS CENTER 40 398,154 88,335 7,969 494,458 12,361 NIA SECONDARY Al TERNA TIVE N/A 411,646 51,707 61,633 524,986 N/A NIA ELEMENTARY ALTERNATIVE NIA 451,405 20,181 24,986 496,572 N/A TOTAL EXPENSE 8,802 40,205,619 3,167,679 2,124,324 45,497,622 5,169 Funding Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg Expense Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg Total Category FY 95196 This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. This category consists of funding for desegregation purposes. This category consists of expenses incurred relative to regular program expense funded by unrestricted local, state and federal sources. This category consists of expenses funded by restricted federal sources. This category consists of expenses incurred relative to desegregation programs funded from desegregation sources. The totals in this column represent the total expense for each school site for fiscal year 1995/1996. Cost Per Student Category FY 95196 SOURCES: The cost per student figures were calculated by dividing each school's fiscal year 1995/1996 total expense by their enrollment as of October 1, 1995. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 644 - LEA# 6002053 6002054 6002056 6002063 6002064 6002065 6002067 SOURCES: - NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR CYCLE 1 SCHOOL PROGRAMS FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; SCHOOL @ 10/01/95 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL BELWOOD ELEMENTARY 126 652,049 35,593 37,143 724,785 BOONE PARK ELEM 429 1,685,711 291,245 96,126 2,073,082 GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY 209 947,419 90,520 65,499 1,103,438 N. HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 398 1,570,100 158,366 89,921 1,818,387 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY 288 1,049,001 116,660 68,714 1,234,375 PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY 346 1,541,294 105,036 96,913 1,743,243 REDWOOD ELEMENTARY 223 1,067,777 147,219 53,483 1,268,479 TOT AL EXPENSE 2,019 8,513,351 944,639 507,799 9,965,789 See the note section for Cost Per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 645 - COST PER STU FY 95/96 5,752 4,832 5,280 4,569 4,286 5,038 5,688 4,936    NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT BY PROGRAM FY 95/96 PERCENT AVG COST DISTRICT VARIANCE PROGRAM OF PER STUDENT AVG COST OVER DIST AVG/ SCHOOL PROGRAM COST TOTAL COST BY PROGRAM PER STUDENT (UNDER DIST AVG) ELEMENTARY PROGRAMS 24,007,591 52.8% 5,013 5,169 (156) JR. HIGH PROGRAMS 7,690,795 16.9% 5,297 5,169 128 HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAMS 13,799,236 30.3% 5,388 5,169 219 NLRSD PROGRAM COST NLRSD COST PER STU 25000000 20000000 15000000 10000000 5000000 0 PROGRAM COST FY 95/96 PERCENT OF TOTAL COST AVG COST PER STUDENT BY PROGRAM DISTRICT AVG COST PER STU VARIANCE SOURCE: 5400 5200 5000 4800 FY 95/96 Program costs consist of the total cost for FY 95/96 for the indicated category of school programs. The percentage of program cost to the total district cost of $45,497,622 for FY 95/96. The total program cost for FY 95/96 to the total number of students in the program category. The total cost for FY 95/96 of $45,497,622 to the total enrollment at October 1, 1995 of 8,802. The difference between the cost per student by program and the district average cost per student. A positive variance indicates the cost per student by program is greater than the district cost per student, and a negative variance indicates the cost per student by program is less than the district cost per student. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office. 646 LEA# 6002050 6002053 6002054 6002055 6002056 6002057 6002058 6002059 6002060 6002061 6002063 6002064 6002065 6002067 6002069 6002078 N/A SOURCES:  NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR ELEMENTARY PROGRAMS FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; SCHOOL @ 10/01/95 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL AMBOY ELEMENTARY 439 1,728,817 158,226 97,706 1,984,749 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY 126 652,049 35,593 37,143 724,785 BOONE PARK ELEM 429 1,685,711 291,245 96,126 2,073,082 CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY 243 1,001,820 51,097 59,947 1,112,864 GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY 209 947,419 90,520 65,499 1,103,438 INDIAN HILLS ELEMENTARY 382 1,729,148 182,640 87,780 1,999,568 LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY 224 838,566 116,532 56,017 1,011,115 CENTRAL ELEMENTARY 403 1,758,396 213,554 91,824 2,063,774 LYNCH DRIVE ELEM 435 1,684,142 208,795 100,618 1,993,555 MEADOW PARK ELEM 227 933,261 105,375 56,923 1,095,559 N. HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 398 1,570,100 158,366 89,921 1,818,387 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY 288 1,049,001 116,660 68,714 1,234,375 PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY 346 1,541,294 105,036 96,913 1,743,243 REDWOOD ELEMENTARY 223 1,067,777 147,219 53,483 1,268,479 SEVENTH STREET ELEM 377 1,547,852 154,768 86,968 1,789,588 BARING CROSS CENTER 40 398,154 88,335 7,969 494,458 ELEMENTARY ALTERNATIVE NIA 451,405 20,181 24,986 496,572 TOTAL EXPENSE 4,789 20,584,912 2,244,142 1,178,537 24,007,591 See the note section for Cost Per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 647  COST PER STU FY 95/96 4,521 5,752 4,832 4,580 5,280 5,234 4,514 5,121 4,583 4,826 4,569 4,286 5,038 5,688 4,747 12,361 NIA 5,013 LEA# 6002070 6002072 6002077 I SOURCES:  NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR JR HIGH PROGRAMS FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; SCHOOL @ 10/01/95 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL LAKEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL 485 2,337,195 68,419 97,046 2,502,660 RIDGEROAD MIDDLE SCHOOL 603 2,639,520 130,587 120,474 2,890,581 ROSE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL 364 2,069,794 154,956 72,804 2,297,554 TOT AL EXPENSE I 1,452 I 7,046,509 353,962 290,324 7,690,795 See the note section for Cost Per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 648  COST PER STU FY 95/96 5,160 4,794 6,312 5,297 - I LEA# 6002075 6002076 NIA I SOURCES: - NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAMS FY 95/96 I FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; [\nJ SCHOOL @ 10101195 STATE FEDERAL DESEG NLR HIGH SCHOOL-EAST 1,298 6,128,322 229,419 274,017 6,631,758 NLR HIGH SCHOOL-WEST 1,263 6,034,230 288,449 319,813 6,642,492 SECONDARY ALTERNATIVE NIA 411,646 51,707 61,633 524,986 TOT AL EXPENSE I 2,561 II 12,574,198 I 569,575 I 655,463 I 13,799,236 See the note section for Cost Per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 649 - COST PER STU FY 95196 5,109 5,259 NIA 5,388  I  NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CYCLE 1 SCHOOL TEACHER \u0026amp; ADMINISTRATOR EXPENSE FY 95/96 TEACHER ADMINISTRATOR [\n] LEA# SCHOOL SALARIES SALARIES 6002053 6002054 6002056 6002063 6002064 6002065 6002067 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY 172,649 45,194 BOONE PARK ELEM 769,643 81 ,814 GLENVIEW ELEMENT ARY 472,253 45,261 N. HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 619,285 81 ,621 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY 467,983 44,101 PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY 771,728 45,397 REDWOOD ELEMENT ARY 478,999 48,828 TOTAL II 3,752,540 I 392,216 Total district expense for teacher and school site administrator salaries for FY 95/96 was $20,715,738 or 45.5 percent of total expense for FY 95/96 of $45,497,622. Teacher Expense II FY95/96 Teacher salary expense for each Cycle 1 school for FY 95/96. Administrator Expense 217,843 851,457 517,514 700,906 512,084 817,125 527,827 4,144,756 FY95/96 Administrator salary expense for each Cycle 1 school for FY 95/96. Total Category FY95/96 The totals in this column represent the total teacher and administrator salary expense for each Cycle 1 school for FY 95/96. SOURCE: The North Little Rock School District Finance Office. 650 I NLRSD PROGRAM COST FY 96/97 651 LEA# 6002050 6002053 6002054 6002055 6002056 6002057 6002058 6002059 6002060 6002061 6002063 6002064 6002065 6002067 6002069 6002070 6002072 6002075 6002076 6002077 NIA NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT TOTAL PROGRAM OPERATING BUDGET FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES LOCAUSTATE FEDERAL DESEGREGATION SCHOOL PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS LEGAL PROGRAM DISTRICT PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS AMBOY ELEMENT ARY 1,309,154 561,443 69,775 1,401 113,250 56,384 31,989 13,836 14,787 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY 684,749 256,481 31,875 640 97,256 25,758 16,732 6,321 6,755 BOONE PARK ELEM 1,594,213 871,097 108,259 2,174 175,448 87,481 38,954 21,467 22,943 CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY 729,529 406,616 50,534 1,015 55,533 40,835 17,826 10,021 10,710 GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY 890,806 292,451 36,345 730 65,726 29,370 21,767 7,207 7,703 INDIAN HILLS ELEMENT ARY 1,375,541 592,721 73,662 1,479 125,284 59,525 33,611 14,607 15,611 LAKEWOOD ELEMENT ARY 674,180 331,549 41,204 828 82,671 33,296 16,473 8,171 8,732 CENTRAL ELEMENTARY 1,303,396 547,368 68,026 1,366 194,355 54,970 31,848 13,489 14,417 LYNCH DRIVE ELEM 1,368,755 691,247 85,907 1,725 135,678 69,420 33,445 17,035 18,206 MEADOW PARK ELEM 767,739 331,549 41,204 828 69,474 33,296 18,759 8,171 8,732 N. HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 1,146,905 720,962 89,600 1,800 117,670 72,404 28,024 17,767 18,989 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY 844,885 441,022 54,810 1,101 74,142 44,290 20,645 10,868 11,616 PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY 1,178,378 588,030 73,079 1,468 73,553 59,054 28,793 14,491 15,488 REDWOOD ELEMENTARY 872,657 320,601 39,844 800 78,042 32,197 21,323 7,901 8,444 SEVENTH STREET ELEM 1,163,805 511,398 63,556 1,277 104,156 51,358 28,437 12,603 13,469 LAKEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL 1,876,012 792,901 98,541 1,979 132,555 79,628 45,840 19,540 20,883 RIDGEROAD MIDDLE SCHOOL 2,086,635 946,164 117,588 2,362 61,083 95,020 50,986 23,317 24,920 NLR HIGH SCHOOL-EAST 5,242,253 2,144,118 266,467 5,352 21,916 215,327 128,093 52,839 56,472 NLR HIGH SCHOOL-WEST 5,207,064 2,105,020 261,608 5,254 143,064 211,400 127,233 51,876 55,442 ROSE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL 1,914,800 569,263 70,747 1,421 150,949 57,169 46,788 14,029 14,993 ARGENT A ACADEMY 675,436 0 0 0 92,881 0 16,504 0 0 TOTAL PROGRAM BUDGET 32,906,892 14,022,001 1,742,631 35,000 2,164,686 1,408,182 804,070 345,556 369,312 For the first quarter of FY 96/97, the district Incurred expenses totaling $7,000,164 or 13.0 percent of their total FY 96/97 budget. See the note section on the next page for explanations of the categories. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office. 652  LEGAL TOTAL 3,403 2,175,422 1,555 1,128,122 5,281 2,927,317 2,465 1,325,084 1,773 1,353,878 3,593 2,295,634 2,010 1,199,114 3,318 2,232,553 4,190 2,425,608 2,010 1,281,762 4,370 2,218,481 2,673 1,506,052 3,565 2,035,888 1,943 1,383,752 3,100 1,953,1~9 4,807 3,072,686 5,736 3,41 l 11 12,997 8,145,834 12,760 8,180\n121 3,451 2,843,810 0 784,821 I 85,000 53,6 3,3 D I NOTES FOR NLRSD TOT AL PROGRAM OPERA TING BUDGET SCHEDULE FOR FY 96/97 Funding Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg Expense Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg Total Category FY 96197 SOURCE: This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. This category consists of funding for desegregation purposes. This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to regular program expense, district expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded by unrestricted local, state and federal sources. This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to federal program expense and district expense funded by restricted federal sources. This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to desegregation program expense, district expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded from desegregation sources. The totals in this column represent the total budget for each school site for fiscal year 1996/1997. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office. 653 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CYCLE 1 SCHOOL PROGRAM OPERATING BUDGET FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES LOCAUSTATE FEDERAL DESEGREGATION LEA# SCHOOL PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS LEGAL PROGRAM DISTRICT PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS 6002053 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY 684,749 256.481 31,875 640 97,256 25,758 16,732 6,321 6,755 6002054 BOONE PARK ELEM 1,594,213 871,097 108,259 2,174 175,448 87,481 38,954 21,467 22,943 6002056 GLENVIEW ELEMENT ARY 890,806 292,451 36,345 730 65,726 29,370 21,767 7,207 7,703 6002063 N HEIGHTS ELEMENT ARY 1,146,905 720,962 89,600 1,800 117,670 72.404 28,024 17,767 18,989 6002064 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY 844,885 441,022 54,810 1,101 74,142 44,290 20,645 10,868 11,616 6002065 PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY 1,178,378 588,030 73,079 1.468 73,553 59,054 28,793 14,491 15,488 6002067 REDWOOD ELEMENT ARY 872,657 320,601 39,844 800 78,042 32,197 21,323 7,901 8.444 TOT AL CYCLE 1 PROGRAM BUDGET 7,212,593 3,490,644 433,812 8,713 681,837 350,554 176,238 86,022 91,938 SOURCE: The district's Total Program Expense for the first quarter of FY 96/97 was $7,000,163, with the Total Program Budget for FY 96/97 budgeted at $53,883,330. The programs funded in each of the Cycle 1 schools are indicated on the chart entitled \"Programs in Cycle 1 Schools.\" See the note section for Total Program Operating Budget for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories and totals. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office. 654 LEGAL TOTAL 1,555 1,128,122 5,281 2,927,317 1,773 1,353,878 4,370 2,218,491 2,673 1,506,052 3,565 2,035,899 1,943 1,383,752 21,160 12,553,511 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT Programs in Cycle 1 Schools FY 96/97 BELWOOD BOONE PARK GLENVIEW N. HEIGHTS PARK HILL PIKE VIEW REDWOOD PROGRAMS ELEM ELEM ELEM ELEM ELEM ELEM ELEM Four-Year Old X X Kindergarten X X X X X X X Elementary X X X X X X X Elementary Music X X X X X X X Itinerant Instruction X X X X X X X Resource Room X X X X X X X Special Class X X X X X Homebound \u0026amp; Hospital X X X X X X X Gifted \u0026amp; Talented X X X X X X X Guidance Services X X X X X X X Library Services X X X X X X X SOURCE: The North Little Rock School District Finance Office. 655 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL sTRrc COST PER STUDENT FOR TOTAL PROGRAMS FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL\u0026amp; COST PER STU LEA# 6002050 6002053 6002054 6002055 6002056 6002057 6002058 6002059 6002060 6002061 6002063 6002064 6002065 6002067 6002069 6002070 6002072 6002075 6002076 6002077 NIA SCHOOL @ 10/01/96 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL AMBOY ELEMENTARY 359 1,941,773 169,634 64,015 2,175,422 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY 164 973,745 123,014 31,363 1,128,122 BOONE PARK ELEM 557 2,575,743 262,929 88,645 2,927,317 CRESlWOOO ELEMENTARY 260 1,187,694 96,368 41,022 1,325,084 GLEtMEW ELEMENTARY 187 1,220,332 95,096 38,450 1,353,878 INDIAN HILLS ELEMENT ARY 379 2,043,403 184,809 67,422 2,295,634 LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY 212 1,047,761 115,967 35,386 1,199,114 CENTRAL ELEMENTARY 350 1,920,156 249,325 63,072 2,232,553 LYNCH DRIVE ELEM 442 2,147,634 205,098 72,876 2,425,608 MEADOW PARK ELEM 212 1,141,320 102,770 37,672 1,281 ,762 N. HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 461 1,959,267 190,074 69,150 2,218,491 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY 282 1,341 ,818 118,432 45,802 1,506,052 PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY 376 1,840,955 132,607 62,337 2,035,899 REDWOOD ELEMENTARY 205 1,233,902 110,239 39,611 1,383,752 SEVENTH STREET ELEM 327 1,740,036 155,514 57,609 1,953,159 LAKEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL 507 2,769,433 212,183 91 ,070 3,072,686 RIDGEROAD MIDDLE SCHOOL 605 3,152,749 156,103 104,959 3,413,811 NLR HIGH SCHOOL-EAST 1,371 7,658,190 237 ,243 250,401 8,145,834 NLR HIGH SCHOOL-WEST 1 346 7 578,946 354 464 247,311 8,180,721 ROSE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL 364 2,556,231 208,118 79,261 2,843,610 ARGENTA ACADEMY N/A 675,436 92,881 16,504 784,821 TOTAL BUDGET 8,966 48,706,524 3,572,868 1,603,938 53,883,330 For the first quarter of FY 96/97, the district incurred expenses totaling $7,000,164 or 13.0 percent of their total budget for the fiscal year. Funding Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. This category consists of funding for desegregation purposes. Expense Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg Total Category FY 96197 This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to regular programs funded by unrestricted local, state and federal sources. This category consists of budgeted expenses funded by restricted federal sources. This category consists of budgeted expenses relative to desegregation programs funded f ram desegregation sources. The totals in this column represent the total budget for each school site for fiscal year 1996/1997. Cost Per Student Category FY96197 SOURCE: The cost per student figures were calculated by dividing each school's FY 96/97 total budget by their enrollment as of October 1 , 1996. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Serwces Division of the 656 FY 96/97 6,060 6,879 5,256 5,096 7,240 6,057 5,656 6,379 5,488 6,046 4,812 5,341 5,415 6,750 5,973 6,061 5,643 5,942 6,078 7,812 NIA 6,010 LEA# 6002053 6002054 6002056 6002063 6002064 6002065 6002067 I SOURCE: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR CYCLE 1 SCHOOL PROGRAMS FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES I ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; SCHOOL @ 10/01/96 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL BELWOOD ELEMENTARY 164 973,745 123,014 31,363 1,128,122 BOONE PARK ELEM 557 2,575,743 262,929 88,645 2,927,317 GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY 187 1,220,332 95,096 38,450 1,353,878 N. HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 461 1,959,267 190,074 69,150 2,218,491 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY 282 1,341,818 118,432 45,802 1,506,052 PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY 376 1,840,955 132,607 62,337 2,035,899 REDWOOD ELEMENTARY 205 1,233,902 110,239 39,611 1,383,752 TOT AL BUDGET I 2,232 II 11 ,145,762 I 1,032,391 I 375,358 I 12,553,511 See the note section for Cost per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 657 I COST PER STU FY 96/97 6,879 5,256 7,240 4,812 5,341 5,415 6,750 5,624 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT BY PROGRAM FY 96/97 PERCENT AVG COST DISTRICT VARIANCE PROGRAM OF PER STUDENT AVG COST OVER DIST AVG/ SCHOOL PROGRAM BUDGET TOTAL BUDGET BY PROGRAM PER STUDENT (UNDER DIST AVG) ELEMENTARY PROGRAMS 28,226,668 52.4% 5,914 6,010 (96) JR. HIGH PROGRAMS 9,330,107 17.3% 6,321 6,010 311 HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAMS 16,326,555 30.3% 6,009 6,010 (1) NLRSD PROGRAM COST FY 96/97 NLRSD COST PER STU FY 96/97 30000000 20000000 10000000 0 PROGRAM COST PERCENT OF TOTAL COST AVG COST PER STUDENT BY PROGRAM DISTRICT AVG COST PER STU VARIANCE SOURCE: 6400 6200 6000 5800 5600 Program costs consist of the total budget for FY 00/97 for the indicated category of school programs. The percentage of program budget to the total district budget of $53,883,330 for FY 96/97. The total program budget for FY 00/97 to the total number of students in the program category. The total budget for FY 96/97 of $53,883,330 to the total enrollment at October 1, 1996 of 8,966. The difference between the cost per student by program and the district average cost per student. A positive variance indicates the cost per student by program is greater than the district cost per student, and a negative variance indicates the cost per student by program is less than the district cost per student. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office. 658 I LEA# 6002050 6002053 6002054 6002055 6002056 6002057 6002058 6002059 6002060 6002061 6002063 6002064 6002065 6002067 6002069 NIA SOURCE: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR ELEMENTARY PROGRAMS FY 96/97 I FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; SCHOOL @ 10101196 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL AMBOY ELEMENT ARY 359 1,941,773 169,634 64,015 2,175,422 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY 164 973,745 123,014 31,363 1,128,122 BOONE PARK ELEM 557 2,575,743 262,929 88,645 2,927,317 CRESTWOOD ELEMENTARY 260 1,187,694 96,368 41,022 1,325,084 GLENVIEW ELEMENT ARY 187 1,220,332 95,096 38,450 1,353,878 INDIAN HILLS ELEMENTARY 379 2,043,403 184,809 67,422 2,295,634 LAKEWOOD ELEMENTARY 212 1,047,761 115,967 35,386 1,199,114 CENTRAL ELEMENTARY 350 1,920,156 249,325 63,072 2,232,553 LYNCH DRIVE ELEM 442 2,147,634 205,098 72,876 2,425,608 MEADOW PARK ELEM 212 1,141,320 102,770 37,672 1,281,762 N HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 461 1,959,267 190,074 69,150 2,218,491 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY 282 1,341,818 118,432 45,802 1,506,052 PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY 376 1,840,955 132,607 62,337 2,035,899 REDWOOD ELEMENTARY 205 1,233,902 110,239 39,611 1,383,752 SEVENTH STREET ELEM 327 1,740,036 155,514 57,609 1,953,159 ARGENTA ACADEMY NIA 675,436 92,881 16,504 784,821 TOTAL BUDGET 4,773 24,990,975 2,404,757 830,936 28,226,668 See the note section for Cost per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 659 COST PER STU FY 96/97 6,060 6,879 5,256 5,096 7,240 6,057 5,656 6,379 5,488 6,046 4,812 5,341 5,415 6,750 5,973 NIA 5,914 LEA# 6002070 6002072 6002077 I SOURCE: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR JR HIGH PROGRAMS FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; SCHOOL @ 10/01/96 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL LAKEWOOD MIDDLE SCHOOL 507 2,769,433 212,183 91,070 3,072,686 RIDGEROAD MIDDLE SCHOOL 605 3,152,749 156,103 104,959 3,413,811 ROSE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL 364 2,556,231 208,118 79,261 2,843,610 TOTAL BUDGET I 1,476 I 8,478,413 576,404 275,290 9,330,107 See the note section for Cost per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 660 COST PER STU FY 96/97 6,061 5,643 7,812 6,321 LEA# 6002075 6002076 I OURCE: NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAMS FY 96/97 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL \u0026amp; SCHOOL @ 10/01/96 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL NLR HIGH SCHOOL-EAST 1,371 7,658,190 237,243 250,401 8,145,834 NLR HIGH SCHOOL-WEST 1,346 7,578,946 354,464 247,311 8,180,721 TOTAL BUDGET I 2,717 I 15,237,136 591,707 497,712 16,326,555 See the note section for Cost per Student for Total Programs for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories, totals and cost per student category. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 661 COST PER STU FY 96/97 5,942 6,078 6,009 NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT CYCLE 1 SCHOOL TEACHER \u0026amp; ADMINISTRATOR BUDGET FY 96/97 LEA# SCHOOL TEACHER SALARIES ADMINISTRATOR SALARIES 6002053 BELWOOD ELEMENTARY 374,255 45,194 6002054 BOONE PARK ELEM 939,459 96,460 6002056 GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY 460,090 44,966 6002063 N. HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 656,954 85,575 6002064 PARK HILL ELEMENTARY 556,328 44,101 6002065 PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARY 744,339 45,397 6002067 REDWOOD ELEMENTARY 467,337 48,828 TOTAL BUDGET 4,198,762 410,521 Teacher Budget FY 96197 The district's total teacher and school site administrator salary expense for the first quarter of FY 96/97 was $2,542,867 or 36.3 percent of the district's total expense for the same period of $7,000,164. The district's teacher and school site administrator budget for FY 96/97 totaled $22,450,193 or 41. 7 percent of the district's total budget for FY 96/97 of $53,883,330. Teacher salary budget for each Cycle 1 school for FY 96/97. Administrator Budget FY 96197 Total Category FY 96197 SOURCE: School site administrator budget for each Cycle 1 school for FY 96/97. The totals represent the total teacher and school site administrator salary budget for each Cycle 1 school for FY 96/97. The North Little Rock School District Finance Office. 662 TOTAL 419,449 1,035,919 505,056 742,529 600,429 789,736 516,165 4,609,283 PCSSD PROGRAM COST FY 95/96 663    F . BUDGET INFORMATION 1. Cost of operating all elementary programs, junior high school programs, and high school programs by funding source (local/regular state/federal and special state desegregation funding). Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) The following is a summary of the PCS SD Program Cost Section of the February 1, 1997 Monitoring Report. Total program expense for the district is separated by funding source and expense category within the funding source. Total program expense is actual for FY 95/96 and budgeted for FY 96/97. Separate schedules indicate the total program expen e for the Cycle 1 schools. The programs funded by the Cycle l schools are al o included. Teacher expense and school administrator expen e are presented for the Cycle I school . Cost per student information is presented for the: district~ elementary school programs\njunior high school programs~ high school programs~ and Cycle l school programs. Total Operating Expenses The district's total operating expenses for FY 95/96 were $99,828,066 which was an increase of $3,898,714 or 4.1 percent over FY 94/95 expenses of $95,929,352. The district's total operating expenses for FY 96/97 are budgeted at $112,075,972 resulting in an increase of $12,247,906 for the current fiscal year. Elementary school operating costs rose from $52,941,073 in FY 94/95 to $54, I 03,532 in FY 95/96. Elementary school operating costs are budgeted to increase in FY 96/97 to $62,022,138 or 14.6 percent. Operating costs for junior high schools increased 4.5 percent in FY 95/96 over the operating cost for FY 94/95 of $20,285,3 8 l . The district has budgeted junior high operating costs to increase $2,797,739 in FY 96/97 to $23,991,552 . Operating costs for high schools increased from $22,702,898 in FY 94/96 to $24,530,721 in FY 95/97. The cost of operating the district's high schools is budgeted to increase 6.2 percent in FY 96/97 to $26,062,282. SOURCES: The Pulaski County ~\\JJecial School District Finance qf[ice, the ADE General Finance Section, and the A/JI~ Local Fiscal Services Section. 664    F. BUDGET INFORMATION (Continued) 1. Cost of operating all elementary programs, junior high school programs, and high school programs by funding source (local/regular state/federal and special state desegregation funding). (Continued) Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) (Continued) Enrollment Total district enrollment as of October I, 1995 declined by 67 students or 0.3 percent in FY 95/96 for a total enrollment of 20,285 as compared with total enrollment as of October I, 1994 of 20,352. Enrollment declined in FY 96/97 to 20,047 as of October 1, 1996 resulting in a decrease in enrollment of 1.2 percent. Enrollment in the district's elementary schools decreased from 11,476 in FY 94/95 to 11,313 or 1.4 percent in FY 95/96. Elementary enrollment decreased an additional 2. 5 percent in FY 96/97 to 11,029 as of October 1, 1996. Junior high school enrollment declined by 27 students from 4,366 in FY 94/95 to 4,339 in FY 95/96. Junior high enrollment further declined in FY 96/97 to 4,249 as of October 1, 1996 . Enrollment in the district's high schools increased from 4,510 in FY 94/95 to 4,633 or 2. 7 percent in FY 95/96. High school enrollment increased an additional 2. 9 percent in FY 96/97 to 4,769 as of October l, I 996. Cost per Student Rate The district's cost per student rate increased from $4,714 in FY 94/95 to $4,921 in FY 95/96 resulting in an overall cost per student increase of 4.4 percent. The district's cost per student rate is budgeted to increase to $5,591 in FY 96/97. The elementary cost per student rate increased from $4,613 in FY 94/95 to $4,782 or 3. 7 percent in FY 95/96. The elementary cost per .. tu dent rate is budgeted to increase in FY 96/97 to $5,624. SOURCES: The Pulaski Co1111ty  .\\/H!c:ial School District Finance (!([ice, the ADI~ G,mera! F111a11ce Section and the ADE Local Fisc ,I Services Section. 665    F . BUDGET I FORMATION (Continued) 1. Cost of operating all elementary programs, junior high school programs, and high school programs by funding source (local/regular state/federal and special state desegregation funding). (Continued) Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) (Continued) Cost per Student Rate (Continued) The junior high school cost per student rate rose in FY 95/96 to$4,884 from the FY 94/95 junior high cost per student rate of $4,646. The junior high cost per student rate is budgeted to increase an additional 15.6 percent in FY 96/97 to $5,646. The high school cost per student rate increased from $5,034 in FY 94/95 to $5,295 or 5.2 percent in FY 95/96. The high school co t per student rate i budgeted to increase to $5,465 in FY 96/97. Desegregation Expense The district's desegregation costs for FY 95/96 totaled $10,807,566. The district received desegregation funding from the ADE in FY 95/96 as stipulated in the Settlement Agreement totaling $9,529,691. In FY 96/97, the district has budgeted $12,554,647 in total desegregation costs. The ADE's desegregation funding to the district for FY 96/97 should total approximately $6,502,412. All of the information received from the PCS SD has been reconciled for accuracy and reliability with no exceptions noted. The district is utilizing the funds received from the ADE in accordance with the Settlement Agreement for desegregation purposes. SOURCES: The Pulaski County Special School District Finance Office, the ADE General Finance Section, and the ADE Local Fiscal Services Section . 666 LEA# 6003090 6003092 6003093 6003094 6003095 6003099 6003100 6003102 6003103 6003104 6003105 6003106 6003108 6003110 6003111 6003112 6003113 6003116 6003117 6003120 6003122 6003123 e 125 0 3126 003127 1128 00 1 9 'i 31 cl oa 1 00 136 00J137 0031 Ii 0 3140 0 1 .. , 0031  2 31 . 31  SCHOOL HOMER ADKINS ELEM BAKER ELEM CRY ST AL HILL ELEM BAYOU METO ELEM CLINTON ELEM WARREN DUPREE ELEM FULLER ELEM HARRIS ELEM JACKSONVILLE ELEM LANDMARK ELEM LAWSON ELEM TOLLESON ELEM OAK GROVE ELEM ROBINSON ELEM SCOTT ELEM SHERWOOD ELEM SYLVAN HILLS ELEM JACKSONVILLE N. JR. HIGH JACKSONVILLE S. JR. HIGH FULLER JR HIGH SYLVAN HILLS JR. HIGH JACKSONVILLE HIGH WILBUR MILLS HIGH OAK GROVE HIGH ROBINSON HIGH SYLVAN HILLS HIGH CATO ELEM PINEWOOD ELEM COLLEGE STATION ELEM N PULASKI HIGH ARNOLD DRIVE ELEM OAKBROOKE ELEM NORTHWOOD JR HIGH TAYLOR ELEM PINE FOREST ELEM ROBINSON JR HIGH BATES ELEM PROGRAM 974,901 927,176 1,780,513 1,523,076 1,452,638 1,035,756 1,107,476 1,096,278 1,766,632 1,233,319 1,004,504 1,194,529 1,177,956 1,1 5,335 608,781 1,25,227 1,213,016 1,800,333 1,705,891 2,755,634 2,375,053 3,379,584 2,401,907 2,870,890 1,75,859 2,711,067 1,312,641 1,278,582 690,592 2,820,130 958,326 1,394,338 2,662,121 1,228,363 1,216,337 1,517,644 1,593,400 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT TOTAL PROGRAM OPERATING COST LOCAUSTATE DISTRICT 337,107 329,845 761,342 658,654 614,053 479,210 358,888 337,107 780,013 502,030 319,473 564,264 394,155 401,417 141,066 480,247 460,540 658,654 531,073 915,892 889,961 1,035,176 780,013 932,488 374,447 837,062 572,563 600,568 320,511 846,397 394,155 471 ,950 1,019,617 435,645 516,551 485,434 503,067 TRANS 90,034 88,095 203,339 175,913 164,001 127,987 95,852 90,034 208,325 134,082 85,325 150,703 105,271 107,210 37,676 128,264 123,000 175,913 141,838 244,616 237,690 276,474 208,325 249,048 100,007 223,562 152,919 160,399 85,602 226,055 105,271 126,048 272,319 116,352 137,960 129,649 134,359 FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES FEDERAL LEGAL PROGRAM DISTRICT 1,786 1,748 4,035 3,490 3,254 2,539 1,902 1,786 4,133 2,660 1,693 2,990 2,089 2,127 748 2,545 2,441 3,490 2,814 4,854 4,716 5,486 4,133 4,941 1,984 4,436 3,034 3,183 1,699 4,485 2,089 2,501 5,403 2,309 2,737 2,572 2,666 116,170 4,577 120,122 94,736 143,380 72,090 165,306 104,260 195,040 149,173 43,574 554 116,148 56,635 49,225 1,495 554 1,163 1,257 32,814 1,418 4,157 2,268 28,138 15,290 21,505 102,349 74,685 80,862 33,224 1,503 25,324 27,649 111 ,470 1,267 769 242,770 21,952 21,479 49,577 42,890 39,986 31,205 23,370 21,952 50,793 32,691 20,803 36,744 25,667 26,139 9,186 31,273 29,989 42,890 34,582 59,641 57,953 67,409 50,793 60,722 24,383 54,508 37,284 39,108 20,871 55,116 25,667 30,732 66,395 28,368 33,637 31 ,610 32,759 PROGRAM 4,991 207,954 341,635 3,000 359,775 2,188 125,467 46,745 32,270 153,045 2,418 0 182,152 0 1,960 0 0 29,268 27,751 614,316 47,652 0 713,258 36,967 24 ,188 2,560 2,809 1,256 547,625 0 0 0 34,258 2,642 2,300 76,105 340,774 TO AL PROGRAM EXPENSE 58,635,805 21 ,040,635 5,619,517 111,498 2,242,921 1,370,124 3,967,329 SOURCE: See the note section on the next page for explanations of the categories. The Pulaski County Special School District Finance Office, 667 DESEGREGATION DISTRICT 78,148 76,465 176,494 152,689 142,349 111,090 83,197 78,148 180,822 116,380 74,060 130,807 91,373 93,056 32,702 111,330 106,762 152,689 123,113 212,321 206,310 239,974 180,822 216,169 86,804 194,047 132,731 139,223 74,300 196,211 91,373 109,407 236,367 100,991 119,746 112,533 116,620 4,877,623 TRANS 26,705 26,130 60,313 52,178 48,644 37,962 28,431 26,705 61,792 39,770 25,308 44,700 31,225 31,800 11,175 38,045 36,483 52,178 42,071 72,556 70,502 82,005 61,792 73,871 29,663 66,311 45,358 47,576 25,390 67,050 31,224 37,387 80,773 34,511 40,921 38,455 39,852 1,666,812 LEGAL 4,739 4,637 10,703 9,260 8,633 6,737 5,046 4,739 10,966 7,058 4,491 7,933 5,541 5,643 1,983 6,752 6,475 9,260 7,466 12,876 12,512 14,553 10,966 13,110 5,264 11 ,768 8,049 8,443 4,506 11,899 5,541 6,635 14,334 6,125 7,262 6,825 7,072 295,802 TOTAL 1,656,533 1,688,106 3,508,073 2,715,886 2,976,713 1,906,764 1,994,935 1,807,754 3,290,786 2,370,208 1,581,649 2,133,22 2,131,577 1,869,362 894,502 2,0 s,rn, 1,979,2 2,925,8 2,617.856 4,92 ,620 3,903,? ? 5,104, 1 4.41i4,277 , 2,1 }\n , 12 ,82 2, .1. -t 2, 3, 3 1, 61, , I 7 1.e, ,1  2,20., 'J'l  , ~ \"i ,77 ... a7 ,1 2,40 , 01 , - - NOTES FOR PCSSD TOTAL PROGRAM OPERATING COST SCHEDULE FOR FY 95/96 Funding Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. This category consists of funding for desegregation purposes. Expense Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg Total Category FY 95/96 SOURCE: This category consists of expenses incurred relative to regular program expense, district expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded by unrestricted local, state and federal sources. This category consists of expenses incurred relative to federal program expense and district expense funded by restricted federal sources. This category consists of expenses incurred relative to desegregation program expense, district expense, transportation expense and legal expense funded from desegregation sources. The totals in this column represent the total expense for each school site for fiscal year 1995/1996. The Pulaski County Special School District Finance Office. 668 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT CYCLE 1 SCHOOL PROGRAM OPERATING COST FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES LOCAUSTATE FEDERAL DESEGREGATION LEA# SCHOOL 6003122 SYLVAN HILLS JR. HIGH 6003123 JACKSONVILLE HIGH 6003126 OAK GROVE HIGH 6003128 SYLVAN HILLS HIGH 6003136 N. PULASKI HIGH TOT AL CYCLE 1 PROGRAM EXPENSE PROGRAM DISTRICT TRANS LEGAL PROGRAM DISTRICT PROGRAM DISTRICT 2,375,053 889,961 237,690 4,716 1,418 57,953 47,652 206,310 3,379,584 1,035,176 276,474 5,486 4,157 67,409 a 239,97 2,870,890 932,488 249,048 4,941 28,138 60,722 36,967 216,169 2,711,067 837,062 223,562 4,436 21,505 54,508 2,560 194,047 2,820,130 846,397 226,055 4,485 33,224 55,116 0 196,211 14,156,724 4,541,084 1,212,829 24,064 88,442 295,708 87,179 1,052,711 The district's Total Program Expense for fiscal year 1995/1996 was $99,828,066. The programs funded in each of the Cycle 1 schools are indicated on the chart entitled Programs in Cycle 1 Schools.\" See note section for Total Program Operating Cost for explanations of the funding categories, expense categories and totals. OURCE: The Pu/ask, County Special School District Finance Office. 669 TRANS 70,502 82,005 73,871 66,311 67,050 359,739 LEGAL TOTAL 12,512 3,903,767 14,553 5,104,818 13,110  ,-486,34 11,768 4,126,826 11,899 4,260,567 63,842 21,882,322 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Programs in Cycle 1 Schools FY 95/96 SLYVAN HILLS JACKSONVILLE OAK GROVE SYLVAN HILLS N. PULASKI PROGRAMS JR. HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH Middle/Jr. High X High School X X X X Athletics X X X X X Student Activities X X X X X ROTC X Resource Room X X X X X Special Class X X Marketing/Distributive Ed X X X X Business/Office Occupation X X X X X Trade \u0026amp; Industrial X X X X X Home Economics X X X X X Reading X X Career Orientation X X General Cooperative X Special Needs X X X X Tech Prep-Work Place Reading X X X X Itinerant Instruction X Gifted \u0026amp; Talented X X X X X Guidance Services X X X X X Library Services X X X X X SOURCE: The Pulaski County Special School District Finance Office. 670 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT COST PER STUDENT FOR TOTAL PROGRAMS FY 95/96 FUNDING SOURCES ENROLLMENT LOCAL\u0026amp; COST PER STU LEA# SCHOOL @ 10/01/95 STATE FEDERAL DESEG TOTAL FY 95/96 6003090 HOMER ADKINS ELEM 325 1,403,828 138,122 114,583 1,656,533 5,097 6003092 BAKER ELEM 318 1,346,864 26,056 315,186 1,688,106 5,309 6003093 CRYSTAL Hill ELEM 734 2,749,229 169,699 589,145 3,508,073 4,779 6003094 BAYOU METO ELEM 635 2,361,133 137,626 217,127 2,715,886 4,277 6003095 CLINTON ELEM 592 2,233,946 183,366 559,401 2,976,713 5,028 6003099 WARREN DUPREE ELEM 462 1,645,492 103,295 157,977 1,906,764 4,127 6003100 FULLER ELEM 346 1,564,118 188,676 242,141 1,994,935 5,766 6003102 HARRIS ELEM 325 1,525,205 126,212 156,337 1,807,754 5,562 6003103 JACKSONVILLE ELEM 752 2,759,103 245,833 285,850 3,290,786 4,376 6003104 LANDMARK ELEM 484 1,872,091 181 ,864 316,253 2,370,208 4,897 6003105 LAWSON ELEM 308 1,410,995 64,377 106,277 1,581 ,649 5,135 6003106 TOLLESON ELEM 544 1,912,486 37,298 183,440 2,133,224 3,921 6003108 OAK GROVE ELEM 380 1,679,471 141 ,815 310,291 2,131 ,577 5,609 6003110 ROBINSON ELEM 387 1,656,089 82,774 130,499 1,869,362 4,830 6003111 SCOTT ELEM 136 788,271 58,411 47,820 894,502 6,577 6003112 SHERWOOD ELEM 463 1,856,283 32,768 156,127 2,045,178 4,417 6003113 SYLVAN HILLS ELEM 444 1,798,997 30,543 149,720 1,979,260 4,458 6003116 JACKSONVILLE N. JR. HIGH 635 2,638,390 44,053 243,395 2,925,838 4,608 6003117 JACKSONVILLE S. JR. HIGH 512 2,381 ,616 35,839 200,401 2,617,856 5,113 6003120 FULLER JR. HIGH 883 3,920,996 92,455 912,069 4,925,520 5,578 6003122 SYLVAN HILLS JR. HIGH 858 3,507,420 59,371 336,976 3,903,767 4,550 6003123 JACKSONVILLE HIGH 998 4,696,720 71 ,566 336,532 5,104,818 5,115 6003125 WILBUR MILLS HIGH 752 3,394,378 53,061 966,838 4,414,277 5,870 6003126 OAK GROVE HIGH 899 4,057,367 88,860 340,117 4,486,344 4,990 6003127 ROBINSON HIGH 361 1,952,297 39,673 145,919 2,137,889 5,922 6003128 SYLVAN HILLS HIGH 807 3,776,127 76,013 274,686 4,126,826 5,114 6003129 CATO ELEM 552 2,041 ,157 139,633 188,947 2,369,737 4,293 6003130 PINEWOOD ELEM 579 2,042,732 113,793 196,498 2,353,023 4,064 6003135 COLLEGE STATION ELEM 309 1,098,404 101 ,733 651 ,821 1,851 ,958 5,993 6003136 N. PULASKI HIGH 816 3,897,067 88,340 275,160 4,260,567 5,221 6003137 ARNOLD DRIVE ELEM 380 1,459,841 27,170 128,138 1,615,149 4,250 6003139 OAKBROOKE ELEM 455 1,994,837 56,056 153,429 2,204,322 4,845 6003140 NORTHWOOD JR. HIGH 983 3,959,460 94,044 365,732 4,419,236 4,496 6003141 TAYLOR ELEM 420 1,782,669 139,838 144,269 2,066,776 4,921 6003142 PINE FOREST ELEM 498 1,873,585 34,904 170,229 2,078,718 4,174 6003143 ROBINSON JR. HIGH 468 2,135,299 32,379 233,918 2,401 ,596 5,132 6003146 BATES ELEM 485 2,233,492 275,529 504,318 3,013,339 6,213 TOTAL EXPENSE 20,285 85,407,455 3,613,045 10,807,566 99,828,066 4,921 See the note section on the next page for explanations of the categories. SOURCES: The Pulaski County Special School District Finance Office and the Local Fiscal Services Division of the ADE. 671  NOTES FOR PCSSD COST PER STUDENT FOR TOTAL PROGRAMS FOR FY 95/96 Funding Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg This category includes funding from local sources, regular state sources, and unrestricted federal sources. This category includes funding from restricted federal sources which must be accounted for separately from the General Fund. This category consists of funding for desegregation purposes. Expense Categories Local \u0026amp; State Federal Deseg Total Category FY 95/96 This category consists of expenses incurred relative to regular pr\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1662","title":"Court filings concerning summary judgment on the issues of health insurance, special education, and loss funding, requiring the ODM Monitoring monitoring, NLRSD motion to add classrooms at Seventh Street Elementary School, and LRSD 1996-97 second quarter status report","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["1997-02"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Arkansas. Department of Education","Special districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Joshua Intervenors","Seventh Street Elementary School, (North Little Rock, Ark.)","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Education--Economic aspects","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","School management and organization","School employees","School facilities","School buildings","Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","School integration","Teachers","Student assistance programs","School improvement programs"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings concerning summary judgment on the issues of health insurance, special education, and loss funding, requiring the ODM Monitoring monitoring, NLRSD motion to add classrooms at Seventh Street Elementary School, and LRSD 1996-97 second quarter status report"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1662"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["114 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"District Court, Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) brief in opposition to Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD), Little Rock School District (LRSD), and North Little Rock School District's (NLRSD's) motion for summary judgment on the issues of health insurance, special education, and loss funding; District Court, declaration of Tristan Greene in opposition to Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD), Little Rock School District (LRSD), and NLRSD's motion for summary judgment on the issues of health insurance, special education, and loss funding; District Court, motion to require Office of Desegregation Monitoring monitoring or, in the alternative, for Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) to show cause; District Court, Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) response to motion to require Office of Desegregation Monitoring monitoring or, in the alternative, for Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) to show cause; District Court, brief in support of Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) response to motion to require Office of Desegregation Monitoring monitoring or, in the alternative, for Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) to show cause; District Court, North Little Rock School District (NLRSD) motion to add classrooms at Seventh Street Elementary School; District Court, memorandum; District Court, memorandum opinion and order; District Court, joint motion to postpone argument; District Court, Pulaski County Special School District?s (PCSSD's) request for extension of time; District Court, reply of the Joshua intervenors to Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) response to Joshua intervenors' motion to require Office of Desegregation Monitoring monitoring or, alternatively, for the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) to show cause; District Court, order; District Court, judgment; District Court, order; District Court, motion for reconsideration; Court of Appeals, motion to dismiss; Court of Appeals, opposition to motion to dismiss; District Court, order; District Court, notice of filing, Little Rock School District (LRSD) 1996-97 first quarter status report addendum program planning and budget document for desegregation programs and Little Rock School District (LRSD) 1996-97 second quarter status report program planning and budget document for desegregation programs; District Court, two notices of appeal; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool; District Court, further motion to enlarge time  The transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.  FEB 1 S 1897 FILED - - _JLS....OISTRICT COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT CMURllJ DISTRICT ARKANSAS Qfr1Cf. OF DESEGREGATiON MONITORING EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FEB 1 O 1997 WESTERN DMSION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT JAMES W McCORMACK, CLERK By: PLAINTIFF DEP. CLERK v. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. FEB 1 8 1997 ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PCSSD, LRSD AND NLRSD's MOTIONOc\"EGREGAOFFJIOICtl N~FO NITO . FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE ISSUES OF 1.:i 1 1 RING HEALTH INSURANCE, SPECIAL EDUCATION AND LOSS FUNDING I. INTRODUCTION In their motion, which presumably relates solely to the \"issues\" of health insurance matching, special education and loss funding, the Districts level a broad, scattershot attack directed at Acts 917 and 1194 of 1995. These and other new statutes concerning school finance were designed to comply with a State Court's order that requires a funding system that reduces the disparity between the amount of combined state and local funds available to wealthy and poor school districts for the education of children. No matter how it is accomplished, compliance with the State Court's directive to reduce the disparity of available local and state resources between wealthy and poor districts necessarily requires, in one manner or another, that poor school districts be treated somewhat more advantageously in terms of state aid as compared to wealthy districts like the three districts in Pulaski County. As shown in ADE's response to the Districts' motion for summary judgment on the \"teacher retirement,\" issue, the State chose to enact a new funding system that ensured that all school districts, including the very poorest, had a minimum level of combined state and local funds for the education of children while, at the same time, leaving the three Pulaski County districts unscathed.1 Nonetheless, in what might be viewed by some as a pure \"money grab,\"2 these Districts now argue that while they are ''winners\" under the new funding statutes (in the sense that their total state aid for this year exceeds their total state aid for 1995-96) they deserve even more state aid for 1996-97 because poorer districts in the State got a larger relative increase in state aid than they did. The Districts press this argument without regard to the fact that the Settlement Agreement clearly contemplates that the State can make generally applicable changes to its funding statutes even if the changes 1 LRSD and NLRSD, in particular, have presented no evidence to indicate that they are receiving less state aid this year as compared to last year. Further, neither LRSD nor NLRSD has even argued that it would have received more total state aid for 1996-97 if the old \"Act 34\" funding scheme were still in place. Even if one were to accept the questionable method of comparison used in Exhibit \"F\" to PCSSD's December 23, 1996 Reply brief, PCSSD can only argue that it received $106,579 less state aid for this year as compared to last year. 2 These districts often complain that other school officials throughout the State view these Districts as \"greedy.\" These districts do little to discourage such a view when, as they have done here, they file motions asking this Court to force the State to (a) reimburse them for more than 100% of their actual teacher retirement costs, (b) provide them with the same percentage increase -in state funding as that received by poorer school districts, (c) reimburse them at a rate of$57 per day for students in residential treatment facilities when the facilities themselves will only bill the Districts $44 per day for such students; and ( d) reinstate \"loss funding\" for them when each of the Districts is eligible for and will receive growth funding for 1996-97. 2 - serves to \"reduce the proportion of State aid to any of the Districts.\" Settlement Agreement,  ILL. The question of whether the Settlement Agre,ernent mandates the absurd result these Districts seek is for another day. For now, this Court must address the Districts' motion for summary judgment. As di~russed below, the motion cannot be granted. I. The Motion Must Be Denied Or, In The Alternative, This Court Must Again Abswn Pending Final Resolution Of The Lake View Case In response to the Districts' initial motions to enforce the Settlement Agreement, in which these Districts clearly argued that the new funding statutes - did not comply with the Lake View Court's 1994 orders, ADE requested that this Court abstain until a final judgment was rendered in Lake View. Thereafter, in a \"Preb.earing Brief' filed November 18, 1996, PCSSD essentially withdrew its state law and/or Lake View compliance claims, saying that the Districts only wished to pursue issues \"separate and distinct from the constitutional and compliance issues raised\" in Lake View. The Districts now appear to have changed their minds; they again ask this Court to intrude upon the Lake View court's jurisdiction and/or evaluate the new funding system under state law. See 1he Districts' Brief in Support of this motion at p. 5: \"[H]ad Judge Imber ruled on the new formula, she would have found the 3 - changes objectionable and neither fair, rational, nor reasonable under the State constitutional rational basis test.\" The Districts' attempt to litigate state law issues in this Court must be summarily rejected. Under the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution this Court lacks jurisdiction to fore~ state officials to comply with state law, even if the state law claim is pendent to a federal law claim. Pennhurst State School \u0026 Hosp. v. Halderman, 79 L.Ed.2d 67, 92 (1984). Moreover, even if this Court could exercise some concurrent federal jurisdiction over Lake View compliance issues, ADE renews its request that this Court abstain from considering the Districts' motions pending a final judgment in the Lake View case. II. Summary Judgment Is Inappropriate Because There Are Numerous Disputed Issues Of Material Fact In ruling on the Districts' motions for summary judgment this Court may not resolve disputed factual issues, but rather must simply determine as an initial matter whether any material facts are in dispute. As outlined more fully in ADE's response to the Districts' Separate Statement Of Undisputed Facts, there are numerous issues of material fact in dispute. Accordingly, the Districts' motion must be denied. 4 m. Health Insurance and Special Education For the same reasons the Districts' motion for summary judgment on the issue of teacher retirement must be denied, this motion as it relates to health insurance and special education must also be denied. The Districts have failed to present any admissible evidence showing the effect, if any, that the elimination of the \"weighting\" system for special education funding has had on them, nor have they cited this Court to any provision of the Settlement Agreement that requires the State to maintain some form of''weighting\" system for special education students. Further, the District's newly-raised claim concerning the State's per diem reimbursement rate for children in residential treatment centers must be - dismissed for lack of a justiciable case or controversy. It is undisputed that all of the residential treatment facilities within the Districts have agreed to charge the Districts, at most, the per diem rate of reimbursement established by the State for 1996-97. In short, the State continues to fund 100% of the per diem rate for children in residential treatment centers as it did in 1995-96. Unless and until that situation changes, there is not even arguably a case or controversy for this Court to resolve. IV. Loss Funding The Districts' attempt to resurrect loss funding must fail for three basic reasons. 5 First, loss funding has not been completely eliminated. The new funding scheme has retained a \"loss funding\" feature. Under Act 917, a district's current year's equalization funding is based upon the prior year's ADM, thereby giving any district with declining ADM a one-year period of continued funding to enable it to \"adjust\" to the drop in enrollment. Second, the Districts, who bear the burden of proof, have supplied no evidence whatsoever to support their argument that the elimination of loss funding will cause their students to leave for adjoining school districts. There are many reasons why enrollment might decline in these Districts, reasons that have nothing whatsoever to do with \"loss funding\" or \"growth funding;\" and not all students that leave the Pulaski County Districts go on to attend school in the surrounding counties. For example, parents may choose to move their children to private schools within the County when they become fed up with the effects of a teacher strike and a school district's inability to come to terms with its teachers. Enrollment may decline due in part to changing demographics, such as an increase in the average age of a district's inhabitants and a concomitantly lower birth rate. Some students leave when their parents move elsewhere in the State or even out of State to take advantage of lower crime rates or better job opportunities. The Districts' argument that the elimination of loss funding causes them to lose students is not only a non sequitor, it flies in the face of Dr. Don Stewart's 6 - testimony in September of 1994 that parents do not decide to take their students out of PCS SD schools based upon the existence or nonexistence ofloss funding or growth funding for PCSSD or any other district. Third, in a crowning bit of irony, all three of the Pulaski County Districts are eligible for and will receive growth funding for 1996-97. The Districts' argument that the Settlement Agreement requires the \"reinstatement\" ofloss funding under these circumstances is plainly frivolous. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, ADE respectfully requests that the Districts' motion be denied. Respectfully Submitted, WINSTON BRYANT Attorney General BY:~ TIMO .GR,#95019 Assistant Attorney General 323 Center St., Suite 200 Little Rock, AR 72201-2610 (501) 682-2007 Attorneys for Arkansas Department of Education 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Timothy Gauger, certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed this 10th day of February, 1997 by first-class mail, to the following person(s): M. Samuel Jones III WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 200 West Capitol A venue, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3699 Christopher Heller FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026 CLARK 425 W. Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 Stephen Jones JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 3400 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 8 John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. .J. 723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72206 Richard Roachell ROACHELL \u0026 STREET 410 W. Capitol, Suite 504 Little Rock, AR 72201 James M. Llewellyn, Jr. TIIO1\\.1PSON \u0026 LLEWELLYN 412 S. 18th Street P.O. Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 FILED FEB 1 8 1997 OFflCE Of DESEGREGATION MONITORING u.s OIHRICT cou~T EA~Tcou \"'C:Tn~T ~ ,,...,  .. ,c:,a.~ INTIIElJNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F-B 1 O 1997 EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS t . \" WESTERN DMSION JM~[:; W. MClJUl'\\IVl\"\\JI\\, liL.:.RK. By: ___ --:::01'-::-, ::-:-CL;:;;-ER:;--~ LITILE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF v. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al. DEFENDANTS DECLARATION OF TRISTAN GREENE IN OPPOSITION TO PCSSD, LRSD AND NLRSD's MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE ISSUES OF HEALTH INSURANCE, SPECIAL EDUCATION AND LOSS FUNDING I, Tristan D. Greene. declare as follows: 1. I have been the Assistant to the Assistant Director for Finance and Administration for the Arkansas Department of Education since April of 1995. During the course of my work for ADE, I have become familiar with the laws and regulations conrem.ing the system of public school finance in Arkansas, and, in particular, the operation of and calculation of state aid outcomes under the State's prior school funding statutes and under the school funding statutes enacted by the Arkansas General Assembly during the 1995 legislative session. 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A are ADE's December 27, 1996 printouts reflecting projected State Aid for LRSD, PCSSD and NLRSD for 1996- 97, based on 1995-96 three quarter average ADM and adjusted for growth in the 1  - 1996-97 first quarter. Unless one of these Districts reports (a) a clerical error in its previous year's attendance reports, or (b) an error in its abstract of assessment, or (c) an error in its previous year's miscellaneous funds, or (d) a clerical error in its scheduled bonded debt payment or ( e) an error in its 1996-97 first quarter attendance report, the amounts reflected in the ~ecember 27, 1996 printouts will accurately reflect the amount of regular state aid distributed to the three Districts for 1996-97. Among other things, these printouts show: a. LRSD's 1996-97 first quarter ADM exceeds its 1995-96 three-quarter average ADM by 247.74, and LRSD will receive student growth funding in the amount of$ 744,183 for 1996-97; b. PCSSD's 1996-97 first quarter ADM exceeds its 1995-96 three-quarter average ADM by 27.02, and PCSSD will receive student growth funding in the amount of$ 81,165 for 1996-97; and c. NLRSD's 1996-97 first quarter ADM exceeds its 1995-96 three-quarter average ADM by 140.79, and NLRSD will receive student growth funding in the amount of$ 422,917 for 1996-97. 3. Due to a .. quirk\" in the new funding formula that did not require the Newark School District to raise its millage rate (Section 7(f) of Act 917), the Newark School District will receive approximately $27,000 in Additional Base Funding for 1996-97. However, because Newark's millage has now increased due 2  - to the enactment of Amendment 7 4 to the Arkansas Constitution, and assuming that the operative provisions of Act 917 are not materially altered during the 1997 legislative session, Newark will receive no Additional Base Funding for 1997-98. 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a ranking of school districts by total voted millage on taxable real property, which repects such millage rates in effect in each district as of September, 1996. It shows that four districts have higher total voted millages on real property rates than LRSD. However, after the millage rollbacks pursuant to Amendment 59 of the Arkansas Constitution are taken into account, LRSD, PCSSD and NLRSD will fall in the ranking. 5. Using information supplied by the Child Nutrition section of ADE - and October, 1996 ADM figures, I have prepared a table showing the number of students eligible for free and reduced-price meals in each school district in Arkansas ( as of October, 1996) and the concentration of such students in each district expressed as a percentage of October 1996 ADM. The table is attached hereto as Exhibit C. 6. Using information derived from the 1990 Federal Decennial Census, I have prepared a ranking of school districts by the percentage of households in each district that are below the 1989 poverty level. The ranking is attached hereto as Exhibit D. 3 7. I have reviewed Exhibit \"F' to the Districts' December 23, 1996 Reply Brief. It is incorrect Among other things, on the first page of Exhibit \"F\" the third column purports to show a \"1996-97 M-M adjustment\" of state aid that to my knowledge will not be made by ADE. Moreover, Exhibit F is methodologically unsound in that it purports to be a comparison of revenue PCS SD received from the State or paid by the State on behalf of PCS SD in 1995- 96 and 1996-97, and yet columns 2 and 3 of page l of Exhibit F purports to add a district cost into the equation. On page 2 of Exhibit Fan incorrect \"1995-96 3Q ADM'' figure is listed. 8. In my declaration filed December 13, 1996, I erroneously stated that - the Table Rate used to calculate M-M incentive funding for the three Districts for 1995-96 was: LRSD: $ 977.28; PCSSD: $ 1889.51; and NLRSD: $ 1686.21. While those were the correct Table Rates that were used to calculate ordinary state aid in 1995-96, the Table Rates used to calculate M-M incentive funding were as follows: LRSD: $ 1064.96; PCSSD: $ 1904.18; and NLRSD: $ 1695.42. 9. The photocopied table from the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette attached to the Districts' brief does not contain accurate information. Assuming the newspaper accurately reported information that may have been provided by ADE, the table at best reflects 1996-97 state aid estimates made on or before the end of June, 1996. Actual 1996-97 state aid calculations differ. For example: 4 (a) Compare PCSSD's 1995-96 K-12 three quarter average ADM reflected on Exhibit A hereto (20,025.77) with the \"students\" figure for PCSSD in the newspaper table (20,080); (b) Compare the total ofNLRSD's 1996-97 Adjusted State Equalization Funding, General Facilities Funding, Debt Serv~e Supplement Payment and Growth Facilities funding as reflected on Exhibit A hereto($ 23,784,504) to the \"Projected 1996-97 State Aid\" figure in the newspaper table for NLRSD ($ 23,697,999); (c) Compare the total ofLRSD's 1996-97 Adjusted State Equalization Funding as reflected on Exhibit A hereto($ 41,530,927) to the \"Projected 1996-97 State Aid\" figure in the newspaper table for LRSD ($41,513,676); and (d) Compare the total of the Lake View School District's 1996-97 Adjusted State Equalization Funding, General Facilities Funding and Debt Service Supplemental Payment ($ 706,648) as reflected in Lake View's December 27, 1996 printout (attached hereto as Exhibit E) to the \"Projected 1996-97 State Aid\" figure in the newspaper table for Lake View($ 709,486). I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 10th day of February, 1997, at Little Rock, Arkansas .. 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Timothy Gauger, certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed this 10th day of February, 1997 by first-class mail, to the following person(s): M. Samuel Jones Ill WRIGHT, LINDSEY \u0026 JENNINGS 200 West Capitol A venue, Suite 2200 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-3699 Christopher Heller FRIDAY., ELDREDGE\u0026 CLARK 425 W. Capitol, Suite2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 Stephen Jones JACK, LYON \u0026 JONES 425 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 3400 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 grccndc2.doc John Walker JOHN WALKER, P.A. -. 1723 Broadway -.. little Rock., AR 72206 Richard Roachell ROACHELL \u0026 STREET 410 W. Capitol, Suite 504  Little Rock, AR 72201 James M. Llewellyn, Jr. THOMPSON \u0026 LLEWELLYN 412 S. 18th Street P.O.Box 818 Fort Smith, AR 72902-0818 /e-~ - ' ~ ~ Timothy G.Qr 6 - (_ STATE AID TO SCHOOL DISTRICT AND EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE TRUST FUNDS FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 DECEMBER 27, 1996 LEA: 60-01 COUNTY: PULASKI l. 1995-96 ADM (K-12. 3 QTR AVG) 1996-97 ADM (K-12. 1ST QTR) 2. REAL PROPERTY AN S 1.185.286.533.00 75% MISC FUNDS $102.158.00 DISTRICT: Little Rock 22,231 .64 ~ 22,47938 . PERSONAL PROPERTY AN $444,714.987.00 M \u0026 0 MILLS AVAILABLE 39.82 3. 4. 5. TOT AL LOCAL REVENUE FOR EQUALIZATION LOCAL REVENUE PER STUDENT .6. W7. ( . 8. 9. BASE LOCAL REVENUE PER STUDENT (BLRPS) ST A TE EQUALIZATION FUNDING PER STUDENT 1996-97 ST A TE EQUALIZATION FUNDING SPECIAL ADJUSTMENT 1996-97 ADJUSTED STATE EQUALIZATION FUNDING \"\" 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. _18. 19. 20. 21. AMOUNT OF EQUALIZATION FUNDING (7) THAT IS TRUST FUNDS GENERAL F ACILlTIES FUNDING STUDENT GROWTH FUNDING ISOLA TED AJD CONSOLIDATION AID DEBT SERVICE SUPPLEMENTAL PAYMENT GROWTH FACILlTIES FUNDING TOT AL LOCAL REVENUE FOR ADDITIONAL BASE FUNDING TOT AL ST A TE REVENUE FOR ADDITIONAL BASE FUNDING TOT AL LOCAL \u0026 ST ATE REV. PER ADM FOR ADDITIONAL BASE MINIMUM TOT AL LOCAL \u0026 STA TE REV. PER ADM ADDITIONAL BASE FUNDING  EXHIBIT ' ' A UTILITY PROPERTY AN $82.309.700.00 ST A TE WEAL TH INDEX -0.01259 $ s s s s $ s s s $ $ $ $ $ $ s s $ $ 42.053. 782.00 1.891.62 3.759.72 1.868.10 41.530.927.00 41.530.927.00 4.025.593.00 0.00 744.183.00 0.00 0.00 66.956.758.00 42.275. I I 0.00 4,859.20 3,887.36 0.00 STATE AID TO SCHOOL DISTRICT AND EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE TRUST FUNDS FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 DECEMBER 27, 1996 LEA: 60-02 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRlCT: N. Little Rock 1. 1995-96 ADM (K-12. 3 QTR AVG) 1996-97 ADM (K-12. 1ST QTR) 8.982.18 9..122.97 .. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. - 7. ( 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. REAL PROPERTY AN $301.59).503.00 75% MISC FUNDS $12.655.00 PERSONAL PROPERTY AN SI 00,003.317 .00 M \u0026 0 MILLS AV Al LAB LE 39.37 TOT AL LOCAL REVENUE FOR EQUALIZATION LOCAL REVENUE PER STUDENT BASE LOCAL REVENUE PER STUDENT (BLRPS) ST ATE EQUALIZATION FUNDING PER STUDENT 1996-97 STATE EQUALIZATION FUNDING SPECIAL ADJUSTMENT 1996-97 ADJUSTED STATE EQUALIZATION FUNDING AMOUNT OF EQUALIZATION FUNDING (7) THAT IS TRUST FUNDS GENERAL FACILITIES FUNDING STUDENT GROWTH FUNDING JSOLA TED AID CONSOLIDATION AID DEBT SERVICE SUPPLEMENTAL PAYMENT GROWTH FACILITIES FUNDING TOT AL LOCAL REVENUE FOR ADDITIONAL BASE FUNDING TOT AL ST A TE REVENUE FOR ADDITIONAL BASE FUNDING TOT AL LOCAL \u0026 STA TE REV. PER ADM FOR ADDITIONAL BASE MINIMUM TOTAL LOCAL\u0026 STATE REV. PER ADM ADDITIONAL BASE FUNDING UTILITY PROPERTY AN $23.8 I 6.6 79 .00 ST A TE WEAL TH INDEX 0.55281 s $ s s s $ $ s $ $ s $ $ s s s s s s I 0.435.236.00 1.161.77 3.759.72 2.597.95 .23.335.255.00 .23.335.255.00 .2.261.886.00 173.790.00 4::?2.917.00 190.733.00 84.726.00 16,430.355.00 13.931.962.00 4.424.25 3.887.36 0.00 ST ATE AID TO SCHOOL DISTRICT AND EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE TRUST FUNDS FISCAL YEAR 1996-97 DECEMBER 27, 1996 LEA: 60-03 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: Pulaski Co. Spec. 1. 1995-96 ADM (K-12. 3 QTR AVG) 1996-97 ADM (K-12, JSTQTR) 20,025.77 20,052.79  2. ... .J. 4. 5. 6. .7. (8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. REAL PROPERTY AN $558,008,639.00 75% MISC FUNDS $73.473.00 PERSONAL PROPERTY AN S 190.866. I 69.00 M \u0026 0 MILLS AV AI LAB LE 41.04 TOTAL LOCAL REVENUE FOR EQUALIZATION LOCAL REVENUE PER STUDENT BASE LOCAL REVENUE PER STUDENT (BLRPS) ST A TE EQUALIZA TJON FUNDING PER STUDENT I 996-97 ST A TE EQUALIZATION FUNDING SPECIAL ADJUSTMENT 1996-97 ADJUSTED ST A TE EQUALIZATION FUNDING AMOUNT OF EQUALIZATION FUNDING (7) THAT IS TRUST FUNDS GENERAL F ACILITJES FUNDING STUDENT GROWTH FUNDING ISOLATED AID CONSOLIDATION AID DEBT SERVICE SUPPLEMENTAL PAYMENT GROWTH FACILITIES FUNDING TOT AL LOCAL REVENUE FOR ADDITIONAL BASE FUNDING TOT AL ST ATE REVENUE FOR ADDITIONAL BASE FUNDING TOTAL LOCAL \u0026 ST ATE REV. PER ADM FOR ADDITIONAL BASE MINIMUM TOT AL LOCAL \u0026 ST A TE REV. PER ADM ADDITIONAL BASE FUNDING UTILITY PROPERTY AN $3 7. 720.003.00 ST A TE WEAL TH INDEX 0.65422 $ s $ $ $ $ s s s $ s s $ $ s $ s s $ 19.345.045.00 966.01 3.759.72 2.793.71 55.946.194.00 55.946.194.00 5.422.865.00 458.544.00 81.165.00 614.706.00 0.00 31.734.178.00 56.485.903 .00 4,399.39 3.887.36 0.00 . ' \\ 1 HOWARD 2 UNION 3 UNION .t WASHINGTON \u0026 PULASKI 6 PULASKI 7. UNION t 8 DESHA 9 PULASKI 10 FAULKNER \\ 11 UNION 12 UNION 13 COLUMBIA 14 POINSETT 15 SEBASTIAN 16 GRANT 17 MILLER 18 IZARD 19 SEBASTIAN 20 MILLER 21 BOONE 22 FAULKNER - 23 FAULKNER 24 MILLER 25 BOONE 26 JEFFERSON 27 RANDOLPH 28 BAXTER 29 WASHINGTON 30 LONOKE 31 UNION 32 BENTON 33 SALINE 34 JACKSON 35 GARLAND 36 CLARK 37 HOT SPRING 38 SEBASTIAN 39 CRITTENDEN 40 HOT SPRING 41 SEBASTIAN 42 SALINE 43 FAULKNER 44 HOWARD 45 GARLAND 46 MARION 47 CRAWFORD -  48 BENTON 49 SEARCY 50 POPE 51 BENTON 52 BENTON , 33 JEFFERSON RANKING OF MILLAGES SEPTEMBER 1996 LARGEST TO SMALLEST UMPIRE 56.40 HUTTIG 34.30 MT HOLLY 44.00 FAYETTEVILLE 17.30 PULASKJ CO SPEC 34.00 LITTLE ROCK 27.80 UNION 21.80 ARKANSAS CITY ~ 35.00 NO LITTLE ROCK 29.40 GUY-PERKINS  6.40 SMACKOVER 24.70 STRONG 25.70 WALKER 8.10 WEINER 36.40 HARTFORD* 22.20 POYEN 36.20 GENOA CENTRAL 20.70 CALICO ROCK 21.00 HACKETT 13.00 TEXARKANA 16.30 OMAHA 24.60 VILONIA 25.90 MT.VERNON/ENOLA 33.00 FOUKE 12.10 LEAD HILL 32.00 WHITEHALL 24.90 BIGGERS-REYNO 28.00 COTTER 37.00 ELKINS 15.90 HUMNOKE 18.00 NORPHLET 10.20 PEA RIDGE 16.10 BAUXITE 26.50 SWIFTON 34.85 LAKESIDE 13.30 ARKADELPHIA 22.60 MAGNET COVE 28.00 FORT SMITH 33.30 EARLE 19.60 GLEN ROSE 20.30 GREENWOOD 14.90 HARMONY GROVE 10.40 CONWAY 14.80 DIERKS 24.60 HOT SPRINGS 8.20 MARION CO 19.60 VAN BUREN 13.60 SILOAM SPRS 16.30 WITTS SPRINGS  6.10 POTTSVILLE 35.70 BENTONVILLE 7.66 ROGERS 17.00 PINE BLUFF 13.10 Page 1 EXHIBIT B 2.00 58.40 19.30 53.60 5.80 49.80 3.00 23.70 44.00 9.90 43.90 1.00 15.10 43.90 0.00 21.20 43.00 1.00 6.50 42.50 3.00 9.50 41.90 3.00 31.60 41.00 16.30 41.00 15.20 40.90 31.90 40.00 3.50 39.90 17.10 39.30 3.00 39.20 18.50 39.20 18.00 39.00 26.00 39.00 3.00 19.60 38.90 2.00 11.50 38.10 12.10 38.00 5.00 38.00 2.00 23.90 38.00 6.00 38.00 12.80 37.70 3.00 6.50 37.50 37.00 1.70 19.40 37.00 19.00 37.00 2.00 24.80 37.00 20.90 37.00 10.30 36.80 1.80 36.65 2.00 21.30 36.60 2.00 11.90 36.50 8.50 36.50 2.50 0.70 36.50 3.00 13.60 36.20 15.80 36.10 21.20 36.10 25.60 36.00 21.20 36.00 2.00 9.40 36.00 27.80 36.00 16.30 35.90 22.30 35.90 1.50 18.00 35.80 3.00 26.70 35.80 35.70 28.00 35.66 1.00 17.30 35.30 I 1.00 21.20 35.30 54 BENTON 55 WASHINGTON 56 WOODRUFF 57 BENTON 58 DALLAS 59 WASHINGTON 60 PIKE 61 WASHINGTON 62 CRAWFORD 63 OUACHITA 64 NEVADA 65 ARKANSAS 66 YELL 67 INDEPENDENCE 68 LONOKE 69 CLEBURNE 70 SALINE 71 POPE 72 PIKE 73 POLK 74 DREW 75 PIKE - 76 CHICOT 77 COLUMBIA 78 GARLAND 79 CLEBURNE 80 CRAIGHEAD 81 INDEPENDENCE 82 POLK 83 OUACHITA 84 UNION 85 WASHINGTON 86 JOHNSON 87 JOHNSON 88 FRANKLIN 89 LOGAN 90 COLUMBIA 91 DREW 92 CLARK 93 YELL 94 LAFAYETTE 95 LINCOLN 96 UNION 97 FAULKNER 98 WASHINGTON 99 POLK 100 HEMPSTEAD - 101 LITTLE R.IVER 102 WASHINGTON 103. JEFFERSON 104 LOGAN 105 YELL 106 FULTot-: RANKING OF MILLAGES SEPTEMBER 1996 LARGEST TO SMALLEST DECATUR 19.00 SPRINGDALE 18.20 COTTON PLANT 20.00 GENTRY 18.70 SPARKMAN 33.60 WEST FORK 9.10 CENTERPOINT 6.70 LINCOLN .. 14.70 ALMA 14.20 BEARDEN 7.10 NEVADA CO 4.70 GILLETT 9.00 DARDANELLE 28.10 CUSHMAN* 9.80 LONOKE 13.35 QUITMAN 20.40 PARON 15.60 ATKINS 25.40  DELIGHT 13.36 ACORN 17.40 DREW CENTRAL 26.10 MURFREESBORO 23.90 LAKESIDE 20.80 EMERSON 19.10 LAKE HAMIL TON 32.40 HEBER SPRINGS 11.27 BROOKLAND 17.90 SULPHUR ROCK 14.70 HATFIELD 20.00 CAMDEN/FAIRVIEW 22.50 JUNCTION CITY 16.00 WINSLOW 31.00 CLARKSVILLE * 15.30 OARK* 9.90 PLEASANT VIEW 25.00 BOONEVILLE 17.00 TAYLOR 12.90 MONTICELLO 15.10 GURDON 20.00 OLA 24.50 LEWISVILLE 12.20 GRADY 21.80 PARKERS CHAPEL 26.70 GREENBRIER 21.60 GREENLAND 21.70 WICKES 14.30 SPRING HILL* 17.20 ASHDOWN 7.00 PRAIRIE GROVE 20.50 AL THEIMER UNIFIED 14.60 PARIS* 15.50 PLAINVIEW-ROVER 17.04 SALEM 16.23 Page2 16.20 35.20 16.90 35.10 15.00 35.00 16.30 35.00 1.40 35.00 25.90 35.00 28.30 35.00 3.00 17.30 35.00 20.80 35.00 27.80 34.90 30.20 34.90 25.80 34.80 3.00 3.60 34.70 24.70 34.50 3.00 18.05 34.40 14.00 34.40 3.00 15.70 34.30 8.80 34.20 3.00 17.80 34.16 3.00 13.60 34.00 7.90 34.00 3.00 7.10 34.00 2.00 11.20 34.00 14.80 33.90 1.50 33.90 3.00 19.53 33.80 1.00 14.80 33.70 18.90 33.60 13.40 33.40 3.00 7.70 33.20 17.00 33.00 2.00 33.00 1.40 16.30 33.00 2.00 21.10 33.00 8.00 33.00 16.00 33.00 20.10 33.00 1.00 16.90 33.00 1.00 12.00 33.00 8.50 33.00 3.00 17.60 32.80 11.00 32.80 6.10 32.80 2.00 9.10 32.70 11.00 32.70 1.20 17.20 32.70 3.00 12.50 32.70 25.60 32.60 2.00 10.10 32.60 17.80 32.40 16.90 32.40 15.30 32.34 16.00 32.23 RANKING OF MILLAGES SEPTEMBER 1996 LARGEST TO SMALLEST 107 LOGAN SCRANTON* 15.32 16.90 32.22 \\ 108 CRITTENDEN TURRELL 8.67 23.50 32.17 109 MARION YELLVILLE-SUMMIT 15.21 3.00 13.80 32.01 110 MONTGOMERY ODEN 21.60 10.40 32.00 111 CRAWFORD MOUNTAINBURG 19.60 2.00 10.40 32.00 112 HOWARD MINERAL SPRINGS 10.40 2.10 19.50 32.00 113 IZARD IZARD COUNTY 15.00 17.00 32.00 11, NEWTON DEER : 12.20 2.70 17.10 32.00 115 CONWAY NEMOVISTA 7.80 3.00 21.20 32.00 116 IZARD MELBOURNE* 5.80 2.00 24.20 32.00 117 WOODRUFF MCCRORY 32.00 32.00 118 BAXTER NORFORK 14.00 18.00 32.00 119 JOHNSON WESTSIDE 12.00 20.00 32.00 120 LINCOLN STAR CITY 19.20 2.00 10.80 32.00 121 CLEVELAND KINGSLAND 9.90 3.00 19.10 32.00 122 DALLAS CARTHAGE 32.00 32.00 123 CROSS WYNNE 9.90 3.00 19.10 32.00 124 GARLAND FT.LAKE 20.00 3.00 9.00 32.00 125 DESHA DUMAS 31.90 31.90 126 LAWRENCE LYNN 19.00 3.00 9.80 31.80 127 POLK VAN COVE 24.10 2.00 5.70 31.80 128 JEFFERSON WATSON CHAPEL 24.30 3.00 4.50 31.80 - 129 CARROLL EUREKASPR 11.25 0.50 20.00 31.75 130 CROSS CROSS COUNTY 8.90 2.00 20.80 31.70 131 CLEVELAND RISON 8.30 2.00 21.40 31.70 132 WHITE SEARCY 19.90 1.00 10.80 31.70 133 VAN BUREN SHIRLEY 12.00 0.00 19.60 31.60 134 INDEPENDENCE BA TES VILLE * 14.75 1.00 15.80 31.55 135 WASHINGTON FARMINGTON 13.90 17.50 31.40 136 CARROLL BERRYVILLE 25.50 5.90 31.40 137 HEMPSTEAD SARATOGA 10.20 1.42 19.70 31.32 138 PHILLIPS LAKEVIEW 8.30 23.00 31.30 139 BAXTER MT. HOME 16.20 15.10 31.30 140 STONE RURAL SPECIAL 23.20 8.10 31.30 141 CLEBURNE WILBURN 16.90 2.00 12.40 31 .30 142 HEMPSTEAD BLEVINS 12.40 18.90 31.30 143 JEFFERSON OOLLARWAY 11.38 19.90 31.28 144 FRANKLIN OZARK* 13.10 18.10 31.20 145 WHITE BALD KNOB 7.90 23.30 31.20 146 HOWARD NASHVILLE 23.00 0.50 7.70 31.20 147 GARLAND JESSIEVILLE 15.80 15.30 31.10 148 PHILLIPS HELENA W-HELE 9.55 21.50 31.05 149 LONOKE CABOT 9.30 1.00 20.70 31.00 150 GARLAND CUTTER MORNING 14.00 2.00 15.00 31.00 151 CHICOT EUDORA 14.50 3.00 13.50 31.00 152 LONOKE CARLISLE 20.40 2.00 8.60 31.00 153 FRANKLIN CHARLESTON 22.50 1.00 7.50 31.00  154 YELL WESTERN YELL 19.00 1.90 10.10 31.00 155 YELL DANVILLE 11 .00 20.00 31.00 156 LAWRENCE RIVER VALLEY 22.00 2.00 7.00 31.00 157 LONOKE ENGLAND 16.93 3.00 11.00 30.93 158 CRITTENDEN MARION 9.10 21.80 30.90 159 SHARP WILLIFORD* 17.00 3.00 10.90 30.90 Page 3 160 VAN BUREN 161 GARLAND 162 SEVIER 163 ASHLEY 164 INDEPENDENCE 165 MILLER 166 CONWAY 167 RANDOLPH 168 NEWTON 169 SEBASTIAN 170 RANDOLPH 171 CRAIGHEAD 172 POLK 173 SALINE 174 GRANT 175 CRAIGHEAD 176 POINSETT 177 ASHLEY 178 CRAWFORD 179 MADISON 180 CONWAY 181 CHICOT - 182 BOONE 183 CRAIGHEAD -- 184 GREENE 185 OUACHITA 186 WHITE 187 CLAY 188 CRAIGHEAD 189 MISSISSIPPI 190 POPE 191 HEMPSTEAD 192 PRAIRIE 193 PERRY 194 MONROE 195 GREENE 196 WHITE 197 MADISON 198 CLEBURNE 199 LOGAN - 200 CRAWFORD 201 VAN BUREN 202 DALLAS 203 POINSETT 204 GREENE 205 FRANKLIN 206 FAULKNER - "},{"id":"suc_abaker_171","title":"School Library Media Activities Monthly Article","collection_id":"suc_abaker","collection_title":"Augusta Baker papers, 1911-1998","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1997-02"],"dcterms_description":["School Library Media Activities Monthly article about Augusta Baker with a copy of a short biographical write up about Baker attached."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Columbia, Ga. : University of South Carolina. South Caroliniana Library"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Augusta Baker Papers, 1911-1998"],"dcterms_subject":["African American women librarians"],"dcterms_title":["School Library Media Activities Monthly Article"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["University of South Carolina. Libraries","South Caroliniana Library"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://cdm17173.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/abaker/id/171"],"dcterms_temporal":["1970/2026"],"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":["Cite as: Augusta Baker Papers, 1911-1998, Box 1, Folder 7. Accession 11770"],"dlg_local_right":["Copyright Not Evaluated. For further information please contact The University of South Carolina, South Caroliniana Library, Columbia, SC 29208."],"dcterms_medium":["articles","bibliographies"],"dcterms_extent":["1 item||7 pages"],"dlg_subject_personal":["Baker, Augusta, 1911-1998"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"hbcula_becu_16","title":"The Voice Newsletter, February 1997","collection_id":"hbcula_becu","collection_title":"Bethune-Cookman University Digital Collection","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Florida, Volusia County, Panama Beach, 28.86832, -81.22778"],"dcterms_creator":["Bethune-Cookman University"],"dc_date":["1997-02"],"dcterms_description":["The student newsletter of Bethune-Cookman College, now Bethune-Cookman University, highlighting student voices, campus and community activities, and current events."],"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["African American universities and colleges","African American students","Campus life","College student newspapers and periodicals","Civil rights movements"],"dcterms_title":["The Voice Newsletter, February 1997"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) Library Alliance"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["https://hbcudigitallibrary.auctr.edu/digital/collection/becu/id/16"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["All rights to images are held by the respective holding institution. This image is posted publicly for non-profit educational uses, excluding printed publication. For permission to reproduce images and/or for copyright information contact University Archives, Bethune-Cookman University, Daytona Beach, FL 32114 (386) 481-2186. https://www.cookman.edu/library/index.html"],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_619","title":"Program planning and budgeting tool","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1997-01-31"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--20th century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance"],"dcterms_title":["Program planning and budgeting tool"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/619"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["budgets"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nLittle Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool nr 1 Code PINV Name PROGRAM INVENTORY % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Jul 3 '96 Scheduled Finish Aug 19'96 Revised Finish Resource Names Jackson 2 PINV Identify and revise DSeg and NonDSeg Programs 100% Jul 3 '96 Aug 11 '96 Jackson,Lewis 3 PINV Review and adjust primary and secondary leaders for DSeg and NonDSeg Programs 100% Jul 17'96 Aug 14 '96 Lewis 4 PINV Finalize list of DSeg and NonDSeg Programs 100% Aug 15 '96 Aug 19 '96 Jackson,Lewis 5 PINV Generate a Program Inventory Report for 1996-97 100% Aug 15'96 Aug 19'96 6 PEVAL PROGRAM EVALUATION 100% Jul 3 '96 Nov 22 '96 Jackson Jackson,Lewis 7 PEVAL Notify program managers that program evaluation begins in fall\nbegin data collection 100% Jul 3 '96 Jul 26 '96 Jackson Page 1 FY98 January 31 '97Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool Tty 8 Code PEVAL Name Review/revise process for cabinet review of program evaluations % Complete 100% Scheduled 3tart Aug 1 '96 Scheduled Finish Aug 15 '96 Revised Finish Resource Names Jackson,Cabinet 9 PEVAL Review/revise program evaluation instrument 100% Aug 1 '96 Aug 15 '96 Cabinet,Jackson 10 PEVAL Conduct required training sessions describing the process and evaluation criteria for designated staff 100% Aug 15 '96 Aug 30 '96 Jackson 11 PEVAL Distribute program evaluation instruments and instructions to primary and/or secondary leaders: provide additonal information/instruments, if needed 100% Aug 26 '96 Aug 26 '96 Jackson 12 PEVAL Program evaluations due from secondary or primary leaders 100% Sep 16 '96 Sep 16 '96 Cabinet,Jackson 13 PEVAL Review program evaluations (DSeg and NonDSeg) for programs needing extended evaluations 100% Sep 18 '96 Oct 2 '96 Cabinet,Jackson 14 PEVAL Finalize identification of programs needing extended evaluation 100% Oct 2 '96 Oct 14'96 Cabinet,Jackson Page 2 FY98 January 31 '9715 Code PEVAL Name Notify appropriate staff to prepare Extended Program Evaluations 16 PEVAL Extended evaluations due 17 PEVAL Cabinet review extended evaluations for merge into needs assessment report 18 NEEDS NEEDS ASSESSMENT 19 NEEDS Review types of data to measure needs of district for FY 96-97 20 NEEDS Analyze results of the budgeting and planning priorities revealed from the 95-96 Needs Assessment Report 21 NEEDS Review strategic planning mission statement and goals of the District Page 3 Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Oct 16'96 Scheduled Finish Oct 21 '96 Revised Finish Resource Names Jackson,Cabinet 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% * Nov 13'96 Nov 18 '96 Sep 3 '96 Sep 3 '96 Sep 4 '96 Sep 4 '96 vn' I ,.y. Nov 13'96 Nov 22 '96 Dec 2 '96 Sep 10 '96 Sep 10 '96 Sep 10 '96 /II\"' i/C.V a Program Managers Jackson,Cabinet Jackson.Cabinet Cabinet,Jackson Jackson,Cabinet 'I '-.vl Jackson,Cabinet 'I .v\nru\nar,'\niinqn\u0026amp;.iu^ lu .FY98'UOi r,is\n'( January 31 '97Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool TIT 22 Code NEEDS Name STANFORD 8 TEST DATA STUDY % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Sep 11 '96 Scheduled Finish Oct 31 '96 Revised Finish Resource Names Jackson 23 NEEDS Define purpose and scope tor Stanford 8 Test data study 100% Sep 11 '96 Sep 16 '96 Jackson,Cabinet 24 NEEDS Assign responsibilities for study of Stanford 8 Test data 100% Sep 11 '96 Sep 16 '96 Jackson,Lacey 25 NEEDS Design data collection plan for study of Stanford 100% Sep 11 '96 Sep 16 '96 Jackson,Lacey Il 26 NEEDS Collect and analyze data from Stanford 8 Test (Fall 95 administration) 100% Sep 16 '96 Oct 11 '96 Jackson,Lacey,Savage 27 NEEDS Prepare Stanford 8 Test Report 100% Oct 11 '96 Oct 31 '96 Lacey 28 NEEDS Submit Stanford 8 Test Report for merge into needs assessment 100% Oct 31 '96 Oct 31 '96 Jackson,Lacey nc-' Page 4 FY98 January 31 '97Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool TIT 29 Code NEEDS Name PRE EDUCATIONAL EQUITY MONITORING REPORTS SURVEY % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Sep 11 '96 Scheduled Finish Oct 31 '96 Revised Finish Resource Names Jackson 30 NEEDS Define purpose and scope for PRE Educational Equity Monitoring Reports Study 100% Sep 11 '96 Sep 16 '96 Jackson,Cabinet 31 NEEDS Assign responsibilities for PRE Educational Equity Monitoring Reports Study 100% Sep 11 '96 Sep 16 '96 Jackson 32 NEEDS Analyze data from PRE Educational Equity Monitoring Reports Studies 100% Sep 18 '96 Sep 30 '96 Jackson,Smith P. 33 NEEDS Prepare PRE Educational Equity Monitoring findings 100% Oct 2 '96 Oct 13'96 Smith 34 NEEDS Submit PRE Educational Equity Monitoring Reports Study into needs assessment listing 100% Oct 31 '96 Oct 31 '96 Jackson,Smith 35 NEEDS SCHOOL CLIMATE/HUMAN RELATIONS SURVEY (SC/HR)STUDY 100% Sep 11 '96 Oct 31 '96 Jackson ) _______- Page 5 3'Ai I? qfS'ijiu'i L* -\"'\"FY98  January 31 '9736 Code NEEDS Name Define purpose and scope of SC/HR Survey 37 NEEDS Assign responsibilities for SC/HR data collections 38 NEEDS Design data collection plan for study of SC/HR 39 NEEDS Collect and analyze data from SC/HR Survey 40 NEEDS Prepare SC/HR Survey Report 41 NEEDS Submit SC/HR Survey Report tor merge into needs assessment 42 NEEDS PORPORTIONALS ALLOCATION FORMULAS STUDY Page 6 Little Rook School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Sep 11 '96 Scheduled Finish Sep 16 '96 kevised F^inish kesource Names Jackson, Cabinet 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Sep 11 '96 Sep 11 '96 Sep 16 '96 Oct 15'96 Oct 31 '96 Sep 11 '96 FY98 Sep 16 '96 Sep 16 '96 Oct 15'96 Oct 31 '96 Oct 31 '96 Oct 31 '96 Jackson Jackson,Hobby Jackson,Hobby Hobby Jackson,Hobby,Savage Milhollen.Mgr. Sup Serv January 31 '97Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool Tty 43 Code NEEDS Name Define purpose and scope of Proportional Allocation Formulas % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Sep 11 '96 Scheduled Finish Sep 17'96 Revised Finish Resource Names Milhollen,Cabinet,Mgr. Sup Serv 44 NEEDS Assign responsibilities for Proportional Allocation Formulas 100% Sep 11 '96 Sep 17'96 Mgr. Sup Serv 45 NEEDS Design data collections plan for Proportional Allocation Formulas 100% Sep 11 '96 Sep 17'96 Mgr. Sup Serv 46 NEEDS Collect and analyze data for Proportional Allocation Formulas 100% Sep 15 '96 Oct 14 '96 Hurley,Eaton,Gadberry,Neal,Milhollen,Mgr. Sup Serv 47 NEEDS Prepare Proportional Allocation Formulas Report 100% Oct 14 '96 Oct 30 '96 Milhollen,Hurley,Eaton,Neal,mng. Sup Serv 48 NEEDS Submit Proportional Allocations Formulas Study Report for merge into needs assessment listing 100% Oct 31 '96 Oct 31 '96 Milhollen 49 NEEDS DESEGREGATION MONITORING REPORTS AUDIT FROM PPM 100% Sep 11 '96 Dec 2 '96 Asso Supt DSeg,Cabinet,Roberts 11 Page 7 -'i^ FYS8 ' January 31 '97Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool Tty 50 Code NEEDS Name Define purpose and scope of Desegregation Monitoring Reports Audit % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Sep 11 '96 Scheduled Finish Sep 17'96 Revised Finish Resource Names Cabinet,Asso Supt DSeg,Roberts 51 NEEDS Assign responsibility for data collection of transcripts and Desegregation Monitoring Reports Audit 100% Sep 11 '96 Sep 17 '96 Asso Supt DSeg 52 NEEDS Design data collection plan for study of Desegregation Monitoring Reports Audit 100% Sep 11 '96 Sep 17'96 Asso Supt DSeg 53 NEEDS Collect data 100% Sep 18 '96 Oct 15'96 Asso Supt DSeg 54 NEEDS Review with Cabinet and Attorneys 100% Oct 16'96 Oct 31 '96 Dec 3 '96 Asso Supt DSeg (Keathley) 55 NEEDS Report findings to PRE, if applicable 100% Oct 31 '96 Nov 19'96 Dec 6 '96 Asso Supt DSeg (Keathley) 56 NEEDS Merge new obligations with Program Budget Document, if applicable (no new obligations) 100% Nov 1 '96 Dec 2 '96 Dec 6 '96 Lewis,Asso Supt DSeg,Keathley Page 8 FY98 January 31 '97Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool TIT 57 Code NEEDS Name COURT ORDERS AUDIT % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Sep 11 '96 Scheduled Finish Nov 29 '96 Revised Finish Resource Names Asso Supt DSeg 58 NEEDS Define purpose and scope of Court Orders Audit 100% Sep 11 '96 Sep 17'96 Cabinet,Asso Supt DSeg 59 NEEDS Assign responsibility for data collection of Court Orders Audit 100% Sep 11 '96 Sep 17'96 Asso Supt DSeg 60 NEEDS Collect data 100% Sep 18 '96 Oct 15'96 Asso Supt DSeg 61 NEEDS Review with Cabinet and Attorneys 100% Oct 16 '96 Oct 31 '96 Asso Supt DSeg 62 NEEDS Report findings to PRE 100% Nov 1 '96 Nov 19'96 Asso Supt DSeg 63 NEEDS Merge new obligations with Program Budget Document 100% Nov 1 '96 Nov 29 '96 Lewis,Asso Supt DSeg Page 9 FY98 January 31 '97Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool TIT 64 Code NEEDS Name TOWN HALL MEETINGS % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Sep 11 '96 Scheduled Finish Nov 21 '96 Revised Finish Resource Names Jackson,Modeste.Roberts 65 NEEDS Define purpose and scope of Town Hall Meetings 100% Sep 11 '96 Sep 17 '96 Jackson,Modeste,Cabinet 66 NEEDS Review previous years data from Town Hall Report 100% Sep 11 '96 Sep 17'96 Modeste, Jackson,Vann 67 NEEDS Review and data collection plan (matrix)for Town Hall Meetings 100% Sep 11 '96 Sep 17'96 Jackson, Vann, Lewis 68 NEEDS Set locations and schedule for Town Hall Meeting 100% Sep 11 '96 Sep 17'96 Vann,Modeste 69 NEEDS Develop advertisement plan and schedule for Town Hall Meetings\nPrepare sample agenda 100% Sep 11 '96 Sep 17'96 Vann,Modeste 70 NEEDS Execute advertisement plan for Town Hall Meeting I 100% Sep 18 '96 Oct 31 '96 Vann,Modeste Page 10 FY98 January 31 '97Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool ITT 71 Code NEEDS Name Conduct Town Hall Meeting I % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Sep 18 '96 Scheduled Finish Oct 31 '96 Revised Finish Resource Names Roberts 72 NEEDS Gather feedback data from Town Hall Meeting I for input into matrix 100% Sep 18 '96 Oct 31 '96 Vann,Lewis 73 NEEDS Execute advertisement plan for Town Hall Meeting II 100% Sep 18 '96 Oct 31 '96 Vann.Modeste 74 NEEDS Conduct Town Hall Meeting II 100% Sep 18 '96 Oct 31 '96 Roberts 75 NEEDS Gather feedback data from Town Hall Meeting II for input into matrix 100% Sep 18 '96 Oct 31 '96 Vann,Lewis 76 NEEDS Execute advertisement plan for Town Hall Meeting III 100% Sep 18 '96 Oct 31 '96 Vann,Modeste 77 NEEDS Conduct Town Hall Meeting III 100% Sep 18 '96 Oct 31 '96 Roberts Page 11 FY98 January 31 '97Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool Tty 78 Code NEEDS Name Finalize and publish Town Hall Meeting Report % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Nov 1 '96 Scheduled Finish Nov 15'96 Revised Finish Resource Names Modeste,Lewis 79 NEEDS Merge findings of Town Hall Meeting Report, 1996-97 into needs assessment listing 100% Nov 15'96 Nov 21 '96 Jackson,Lewis 80 NEEDS DISTRICT DIALOGUES 100% Sep 11 '96 Nov 21 '96 Jackson,Modeste,Roberts 81 NEEDS Define purpose and scope of District Dialogues 100% Sep 11 '96 Sep 17'96 Jackson,Modeste,Cabinet,Roberts 82 NEEDS Review previous years data from District Dialogue Report 100% Sep 11 '96 Sep 17'96 Modeste,Vann 83 NEEDS Review data collection plan (matrix) for District Dialogues 100% Sep 11 '96 Sep 17'96 Jackson,Vann, Modeste 84 NEEDS Set locations and schedule for District Dialogue Meetings 100% Sep 11 '96 Sep 17'96 Modeste,Vann Page 12 FY98 January 31 '97Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool Ttr 85 Code NEEDS Name Develop advertisement plan and schedule for District Dialogues: prepare sample agenda % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Sep 11 '96 Scheduled Finish Sep 17'96 Revised Finish Resource Names Vann.Modeste 86 NEEDS Execute advertisement plan for District Dialogue l(Principals) 100% Sep 18 '96 Oct 31 '96 Vann.Modeste 87 NEEDS Conduct District Dialogue I 100% Sep 18'96 Oct 31 '96 Nov 18'96 Roberts 88 NEEDS Gather feedback from District Dialogue 1 for input Into matrix 100% Sep 18 '96 Oct 31 '96 Nov 18'96 Vann,Lewis 89 NEEDS Execute advertisement plan for District Dialogue ll(Ass't Principals) 100% Sep 18 '96 Oct 31 '96 Vann.Modeste 90 NEEDS Conduct District Dialogue II 100% Sep 18'96 Oct 31 '96 Roberts 91 NEEDS Gather feedback data from District Dialogue II for input into matrix 100% Sep 18 '96 Oct 31 '96 Vann,Lewis Page 13 FY98 January 31 '97Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool TO 92 Code NEEDS Name Execute advertisement plan for District Dialogue lll(Teachers) % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Sep 18 '96 Scheduled Finish Oct 31 '96 Revised Finish Resource Names Vann,Modeste 93 NEEDS Conduct District Dialogue III 100% Sep 18 '96 Oct 31 '96 Roberts 94 NEEDS Gather feedback data from District Dialogue III for merge into matrix 100% Sep 18 '96 Oct 31 '96 Vann,Lewis 95 NEEDS Execute advertisement plan for District Dialogue IV(Admin. and Classified) 100% Sep 18 '96 Oct 31 '96 Vann,Modeste 96 NEEDS Conduct District Dialogue IV 100% Sep 18 '96 Oct 31 '96 Roberts 97 NEEDS Gather feedback data from District Dialogue IV for input into matrix 100% Sep 18 '96 Oct 31 '96 Vann,Lewis 98 NEEDS Execute advertisement plan for District Dialogue V(Transportation) 100% Sep 18 '96 Oct 31 '96 Vann,Modeste Page 14 FY98 January 31 '97Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool TIT 99 Code NEEDS Name Conduct District Dialogue V % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Sep 18 '96 Scheduled Finish Oct 31 '96 Revised Finish Resource Names Roberts 100 NEEDS Gather feedback data from District Dialogue V for input into matrix 100% Sep 18 '96 Oct 31 '96 Vann,Lewis 101 NEEDS Finalize and publish District Dialogue Report 1996-97 100% Nov 1 '96 Nov 15'96 Jackson,Lewis 102 NEEDS Merge findings of District Dialogue Report 1996-97 into needs assessment listing 100% Nov 15'96 Nov 21 '96 Jackson,Lewis 103 NEEDS PREPARE NEEDS ASSESSMENT REPORT 100% Nov 1 '96 Nov 30 '96 Jackson 104 NEEDS Conduct Administrative review of available districtwide reports and objective data 100% Nov 1 '96 Nov 15'96 Jackson,Cabinet 105 NEEDS Review of available districtwide reports and objective data by Board 100% Nov 1 '96 Nov 15'96 Jackson, Board,Roberts Page 15 FY98 January 31 '97Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool nr 106 Code NEEDS Name Publish Draft of Needs Assessment /Report and disseminate to selected persons % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Nov 27 '96 Scheduled Finish Nov 27 '96 Revised Finish Dec 6 '96 Resource Names Jackson,Cabinet 107 NEEDS Publish Needs Assessment Report, 1996-97 100% Nov 30 '96 Nov 30 '96 Jan 10'97 Jackson 106 GOALS PLANNING AND BUDGET GOALS 36% Oct 2'96 Aug 29 '97 Jackson 109 GOALS CABINET PLANNING SESSION 44% Oct 2'96 Jan 30 '97 Jackson,Cabinet 110 GOALS Review 1995-96 Needs Assessment Report 100% Oct 2 '96 Oct 31 '96 Jackson,Cabinet 111 GOALS Distribute 1996-97 Needs Assessment Report to Cabinet members 100% Dec 2 '96 Dec 9 '96 Jan 10 '96 Jackson,Cabinet 112 GOALS Distribute mission statement, goals and written priorities (strategic planning action plans) 0% Dec 13 '96 Jan 30 '97 Young,Modeste, Vann Page 16 FY96 January 31 '97Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool TTT 113 Code PDEV Name PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT % Complete 36% Scheduled Start Nov 1 '96 Scheduled Finish Aug 29 '97 Revised Finish Resource Names Jackson,Cabinet 114 PDEV SUBMIT BUSINESS CASE FOR PROGRAM AND/OR MODIFICATIONS TO SUPERINTENDENT 74% Nov 1 '96 Feb 20 '97 Jackson,Roberts 115 PDEV Review process for program development 100% Nov 1 '96 Nov 12'96 Cabinet,Jackson 116 PDEV Use extended program evaluations to identify program additions, modifications, deletions 100% Nov 18'96 Nov 26 '96 Cabinet 117 PDEV Notify appropriate staff to prepare Business Cases on results of extended program evaluations 100% Nov 18'96 Nov 27 '96 Dec 6 '96 Cabinet 118 PDEV Review recommendations from district needs assessment report in order to identify additional programs or programs modifications resulting in business case(s) 100% Dec 5 '96 Dec 11 '96 Jan 10 '96 Cabinet 119 PDEV Business Cases due 100% Jan 8 '97 Jan 8 '97 Jan 15 '96 Primary Leaders Page 17 FY98 January 31 '97Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool TIT 120 Code PDEV Name Review of Business Cases by Cabinet % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Jan 15'97 Scheduled Finish Jan 22 '97 Revised Finish Jan 28 '97 Resource Names Cabinet 121 PDEV Submit Business Cases for program and/or program modifications to Board of Directors 0% Feb 6 '97 Feb 6 '97 Jackson,Roberts 122 PDEV Review of Business Cases by Board 0% Feb 6 '97 Feb 20 '97 Board 123 BUDGT BOARD RETREAT/BOARD WORKSESSION 87% Dec 9 '96 Jan 31 '97 Roberts 124 BUDGT Determine date and site for Board Retreat 100% Dec 9 '96 Dec 19 '96 Jan 23 '97 Roberts,Board 125 BUDGT Identify and establish agenda items for Board Worksession 100% Dec 9 '96 Dec 19 '96 Jan 23 '97 Board,Roberts 126 BUDGT Identify materials for Board Worksession 100% Dec 9 '96 Dec 25 '96 Jan 23 '97 Jackson,Roberts Page 18 FY98 January 31 '97Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool nr 127 Code BUDGT Name Distribute materials for Board Worksession % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Jan 9 '97 Scheduled Finish Jan 10'97 Revised Finish Jan 31 '97 Resource Names Jackson,Roberts 128 BUDGT Conduct data analysis work session in preparation for Board Worksession 100% Jan 13'97 Jan 13'97 Jan 31 '97 Cabinet,Roberts 129 BUDGT Conduct Board Worksession 0% Jan 21 '97 Jan 27 '97 Feb 1 '97 Board,Roberts 130 BUDGT Report outcomes of Board Worksession 0% Jan 31 '97 Jan 31 '97 Feb 28 '97 Board,Roberts 131 BUDGT BUDGETING 11% Nov 20 '96 Aug 29 '97 Milhollen,Mgr. Sup Serv 132 BUDGT Develop budget preparation training materials 100% Nov 20 '96 Nov 27 '96 Milhollen,Mgr. Sup Serv 133 BUDGT Conduct budget preparation training sessions and distribute instructions for budget preparation training at all levels 100% Dec 2 '96 Dec 9 '96 Mgr. Sup Serv Page 19 FY98 January 31 '97134 Code BUDGT Name Budget managers develop and submit revised 1996-97 expense budget revisions and 1997-98 expense budget requests 135 BUDGT Begin districtwide expense budget consolidation and executive review process 136 BUDGT Year to date revenue expenditure analysis 137 BUDGT Revise financial forecast for coming year 138 BUDGT Submit proposed budget to Board 139 BUDGT Conduct Board Work Sessions on proposed budget 140 BUDGT Revise proposed budget, as needed Page 20 Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Dec 11 '96 Scheduled Finish Jan 8 '97 Revised Finish Resource Names Milhollen,Mgr. Sup Serv 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% Jan 9 '97 Jan 9 '97 Feb 26 '97 Mar 13'97 Mar 18'97 Mar 14 '97 FY98 Mar 11 '97 Jan 31 '97 Mar 7 '97 Mar 13'97 Mar 31 '97 Apr 2 '97 Mgr. Sup Serv Milhollen,Mgr. Sup Serv Mgr. Sup Serv Roberts Board,Mgr. Sup Serv,Roberts Milhollen,Mgr. Sup Serv January 31 '97Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool nr 141 Code BUDGT Name Prepare tentative budget % Complete 0% Scheduled Start Apr 3 '97 Scheduled Finish May 13'97 Revised Finish Resource Names Milhollen,Mgr. Sup Serv 142 BUDGT Board review of tentative budget 0% May 22 '97 May 22 '97 Board,Mgr. Sup Serv 143 BUDGT Conduct Board Work Session on tentative Budget 0% May 23 '97 May 30 '97 Board,Roberts 144 BUDGT Account reconciliation and Purchase Order (PO) clean-up 0% Jun 17'97 Jul 14 '97 Neal,Milhollen 145 BUDGT 146 BUDGT Receipt of state generated revenue numbers (payroll liabilities, adjusted supplemental payroll, last payroll, Carl Perkins, M to M, JTPA, Vocational Ed., Chapters 1 and 2, Compensatory Ed., MFPA, Transportation, ABC) Close-out 1996-97 accounts: adjust physical inventory, (fiscal)federal grants, magnet, state grants, accruals 0% 0% 147 BUDGT Compute ending fund balance 0% Jun 17'97 Jul 17'97 Milhollen Jul 1 '97 Jul 21 '97 Milhollen,Cabinet Jul 22 '97 Jul 22 '97 Milhollen Page 21 FY98 January 31 '97Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool nr 148 Code BUDGT Name Administrative review of final budget % Complete 0% Scheduled Start Jul 24 '97 Scheduled Finish Jul 29 '97 Revised Finish Resource Names Cabinet,Roberts 149 BUDGT Submit final budget to Board 0% Jul 31 '97 Jul 31 '97 Roberts 150 BUDGT Board review and adoption of 97-98 final budget 0% Jul 31 '97 Aug 7 '97 Board 151 BUDGT Submit final Budget to CourVParties 0% Aug 11 '97 Aug 22 '97 Attorney,Roberts 152 BUDGT Submit 97-98 final budget to State 0% Aug 22 '97 Aug 29 '97 Roberts 153 BUDGT Staffing 0% Jan 26 '97 Aug 15 '97 Hurley 154 BUDGT Review/adoption of changes in course offerings by Board 0% Jan 26 '97 Feb 7 '97 Board,Roberts Page 22 FY98 January 31 '97Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool 155 Code BUDGT Name Meeting with counselors and principals to review courses offerings 1996-97 % Complete 0% Scheduled Start Jan 29 '97 Scheduled Finish Feb 15'97 Revised Finish Resource Names Elston 156 BUDGT Print secondary course selection sheets 0% Jan 29 '97 Feb 17'97 Gadberry, Roberts 157 BUDGT Counselors meet with students and complete course selection sheets 0% Feb 19'97 Mar 11 '97 Principals,Counselors .Anderson 158 BUDGT Counselors send course selection sheets to receiving schools 0% Mar 7 '97 Mar 10'97 Principals,Counselors 159 BUDGT Registrars tally course selections 0% Mar 11 '97 Mar 31 '97 Principals, Registrars 160 BUDGT Review course tallies secondary. Note possible staffing changes based on courses requested 0% Apr 1 '97 Apr 21 '97 Gadberry,Hurley,Asst. Supts. 161 BUDGT Identify elementary enrollment (tentative) tor 1997-98 0% Apr 1 '97 May 19'97 Hurley,Gadberry,Asst Supts,Asso Supt DSeg Page 23 FY98 January 31 '97Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool TIT 162 Code BUDGT Name Make determination by subject area (secondary) of possible changes and by projected elementary enrolled % Complete 0% Scheduled Start Apr 1 '97 Scheduled Finish Apr 21 '97 Revised Finish Resource Names Gadberry,Hurley, Anderson 163 BUDGT List known retirements, resignations, and intern positions 0% Apr 3 '97 Apr 24 '97 Gadberry,Hurley 164 BUDGT Identify certified personnel for Reduction in Force (RIF), if needed 0% Apr 22 '97 Apr 29 '97 Hurley,Gadberry 165 BUDGT Notify certified personnel of Reduction in Force (RIF), if needed staff reduction 0% Apr 24 '97 Apr 30 '97 Hurley,Gadberry 166 BUDGT Recall certified personnel from RIF, if needed 0% Jun 3 '97 Aug 1 '97 Hurley,Gadberry 167 BUDGT Notify classified personnel of staff reduction 0% May 6 '97 Jul 15'97 Hurley,Gadberry 168 BUDGT Recall classified personnel from RIF, if needed 0% Jun 3 '97 Aug 15'97 Hurley Page 24 FY98 January 31 '97Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool TO\" 169 Code BUDGT Name PROVIDE BROAD-BASED INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL FEEDBACK % Complete 0% Scheduled Start Feb 2 '97 Scheduled Finish May 1 '97 Revised Finish Resource Names Modeste, Vann,Roberts 170 BUDGT Plan for internal and external feedback. Set locations and dates 0% Feb 3 '97 Feb 17'97 Modeste, Vann,Roberts 171 BUDGT Execute advertisement for district feedback. Session I 0% Feb 3 '97 May 1 '97 Modeste,Vann 172 BUDGT Conduct District Feedback Session I 0% Feb 3 '97 May 1 '97 Roberts 173 BUDGT Execute advertisement plan for district feedback. Session II 0% Feb 3 '97 May 1 '97 Modeste,Vann 174 BUDGT Conduct District Feedback Session II 0% Feb 3 '97 May 1 '97 Roberts 175 BUDGT Execute advertisement for district feedback. Session III 0% Feb 3 '97 May 1 '97 Vann,Modeste Page 25 FY98 January 31 '97Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool TIT 176 Code BUDGT Name Conduct district feedback. Session III % Complete 0% Scheduled Start Feb 3 '97 Scheduled Finish May 1 '97 Revised Finish Resource Names Roberts 177 BUDGT Execute advertisement tor district feedback. Session IV 0% Feb 3 '97 May 1 '97 Modeste,Vann 178 BUDGT Conduct district feedback, Session IV 0% Feb 3 '97 May 1 '97 Roberts 179 BUDGT Execute advertisement for district feedback, Session V 0% Feb 3 '97 May 1 '97 Modeste,Vann 180 BUDGT Conduct district feedback. Session V 0% Feb 3 '97 May 1 '97 Roberts 181 BUDGT Execute advertisement for district feedback. Session VI 0% Feb 3 '97 May 1 '97 Modeste,Vann 182 BUDGT Conduct distict feedback. Session VI 0% Feb 3 '97 May 1 '97 Roberts Page 26 FY98 January 31 '97 JLittle Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool \"IDT 183 Code BUDGT Name Execute advertisement plan for Town Hall feedback. Session I % Complete 0% Scheduled Start Feb 3 '97 Scheduled Finish May 1 '97 Revised Finish Resource Names Modeste,Vann 184 BUDGT Conduct Town Hall feedback, Session I 0% Feb 2 '97 May 1 '97 Roberts 185 BUDGT Execute advertisement plan for Town Hall feedback. Session II 0% Feb 3 '97 May 1 '97 Modeste.Vann 186 BUDGT Conduct Town Hall feedback , Session II 0% Feb 3 '97 May 1 '97 Roberts 187 BUDGT Execute advertisement for Town Hall feedback. Session III 0% Feb 3 '97 May 1 '97 Roberts 188 BUDGT Conduct Town Hall feedback, Session III 0% Feb 3 '97 May 1 '97 Modeste,Vann 189 SPLAN STRATEGIC PLANNING - IMPLEMENTATION OF APPROVED YEAR ONE ACTION PLANS 33% Jul 1 '96 Jun 30 '97 Young,Modeste, Roberts Page 27 FY98 January 31 '97Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool nr 190 Code SPLAN Mame Conduct evaluation for year one Vo Complete 0% Scheduled Start Jul 1 '96 Scheduled Finish Jun 28 '97 Revised Finish Resource Names Modeste, You ng,Roberts 191 SPLAN Identify action plans for year two implementation 100% Jul 1 '96 Jun 30 '97 Young,Modeste 192 SPLAN Prepare for Implementation of site-based management (strategic plan) 0% Jul 1 '96 Jun 30 '97 Young,Asst. Supts,Kohler,Modeste 193 MR MONITORING AND REPORTING OF DESEG AND NONDESEG PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT REPORTS (1ST QUARTER\n2ND QUARTER: 3RD QUARTER: 4TH QUARTER) 49% Aug 1 '96 Sep 1 '97 Jackson 194 MR Revise written program budget document instructions, as needed 100% Aug 31 '96 Sep 5 '96 Lewis 195 MR Plan maintenance education and orientation regarding the program budget document process 100% Aug 1 '96 Sep 2 '96 Jackson,Lewis 196 MR Distribute written program budget document instructions to principals and program managers 100% Sep 2 '96 Sep 4 '96 Lewis,PRE Clerical Page 28 FY98 January 31 '97Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool nr 197 Code MR Name Conduct maintenance education workshops and orientation sessions regarding the program budget document process for principals, clerical staff, program managers, primary and secondary leaders % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Sep 4 '96 Scheduled Finish Oct 1 '96 Revised Finish Resource Names Jackson,Lewis 198 MR 1ST QUARTER PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT REPORTS 100% Aug 8 '96 Dec 20 '96 Jackson 199 MR Review written program budget document with program managers and principals 100% Aug 8 '96 Oct 14 '96 Asst. Supts,Lewis,PRE Clerical 200 MR Carryout training sessions on the Program Budget Document 100% Sep 2 '96 Sep 13 '96 Lewis,Jackson 201 MR Send reminder notice regarding deadline for entering 1st Quarter PBD activities 100% Oct 3 '96 Oct 3 '96 Lewis 202 MR Last day to enter activities for the 1st Quarter PBD 100% Oct 14 '96 Oct 14'96 Oct 25 '96 Lewis 203 MR PRE develops narrative and the Controller provides financial info for the PBD reports 100% Oct 16 '96 Oct 31 '96 Lewis,Milhollen Page 29 FY98 January 31 '97Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool nr 204 Code MR Name PRE combines all information for the 1st Quarter Program Budget Report Complete 100% Scheduled Start Oct 31 '96 Scheduled Finish Nov 8 '96 Revised Finish Resource Names Lewis,PRE Clerical 205 MR Submit report to Attorney for review 100% Nov 8 '96 Nov 13'96 Lewis 206 MR Prepare for publication of 1st Quarter Program Budget Document Reports 100% Nov 13'96 Nov 13'96 Lewis,Jackson 207 MR Submit 1st Quarter Program Budget Document Reports to Court 100% Nov 21 '96 Nov 21 '96 Jackson .Attorney 208 MR Primary leaders provide feedback to the secondary people regarding achievement reporting in the PBD 100% Nov 21 '96 Dec 20 '96 Primary Leaders 209 MR 2ND QUARTER PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT REPORTS 60% Nov 21 '96 Mar 25 '97 Jackson 210 MR Advise program managers and principals on Programs Budget Document 100% Nov 21 '96 Jan 14'97 Asst. Supts,Lewis Page 30 FY98 January 31 '97I Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool \"ITT 211 Code MR Name Send reminder notice regarding deadline to enter activities for 2nd Quarter PBD % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Jan 6 '97 Scheduled Finish Jan 6 '97 Revised Finish Resource Names Lewis 212 MR Last day to enter activities for the 2nd Quarter PBD 100% Jan 6 '97 Jan 6 '97 Jan 13'97 Program Managers,Principals 213 MR PRE revises narrative and the controller provides financial info for Program Budget Document Reports (DSeg and NonDSeg) 100% Jan 29 '97 Feb 4 '97 Lewis, Milhollen 214 MR PRE combines all revised information for 2nd Quarter Program Budget Document Reports 0% Jan 29 '97 Feb 4 '97 Lewis.PRE Clerical 215 MR Submit report to Attorney for review 0% Feb 14 '97 Feb 19'97 Attorney,Jackson 216 MR Prepare publication of 2nd Quarter Program Budget Document Reports 0% Feb 20 '97 Feb 20 '97 Lewis 217 MR Submit 2nd Quarter Program Budget Document Reports to Court 0% Feb 25 '97 Feb 25 '97 Jackson,Attorney Page 31 FY98 January 31 '97ID\" 218 Code MR Name Primary leaders provide feedback to their secondary people regarding achievement reporting in the PBD 219 MR 3RD QUARTER PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT REPORTS 220 MR Advise program managers and principals on the Program Budget Document 221 MR Send reminder notice regarding deadline to enter 3rd Quarter activities 222 MR Last day to enter activities for the third quarter PBD 223 MR PRE revises narrative and the controller provides financial information for 3rd Quarter Program Budget Document Report 224 MR PRE combines all revised information for 3rd Quarter PBD Report Page 32 Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool % Complete 0% Scheduled Start Feb 25 '97 Scheduled Finish Mar 25 '97 Revised Finish Resource Names Primary Leaders 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Feb 25 '97 Feb 25 '97 Mar 7 '97 Apr 3 '97 Apr 29 '97 May 12 '97 FY98 Jun 25 '97 Apr 15'97 Mar 7 '97 Apr 3 '97 May 3 '97 May 12 '97 Jackson Asst. Supts, Lewis Lewis Principals,Program Managers Lewis,Milhollen Lewis,PRE Clerical January 31 '97Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool Ttr 225 Code MR Name Submit report to Attorney for review % Complete 0% Scheduled Start May 13'97 Scheduled Finish May 16 '97 Revised Finish Resource Names Lewis 226 MR Prepare for publication of 3rd Quarter Program Budget Document Report 0% May 20 '97 May 23 '97 Lewis 227 MR Submit 3rd Quarter Program Budget Document to Court 0% May 27 '97 May 27 '97 Jackson .Attorney 228 MR Primary leaders provide feedback to their secondary people regarding achievement reporting in the PBD 0% May 27 '97 Jun 25 '97 Primary Leaders 229 MR 4th QUARTER PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT REPORTS 0% May 9 '97 Sep 1 '97 Jackson 230 MR Advise program managers and principals on Program Budget Document 0% May 27 '97 Jul 25 '97 Asst. Supts,Lewis,PRE Clerical 231 MR Send reminder notice regarding last date to enter activities 0% May 9 '97 May 15'97 Lewis Page 33 FY98 January 31 '97 Jiir 232 Code MR Name ~ Last day to enter activites for the 4th Quarter 233 MR PRE develops narrative and the controller provides financial information for 4th quarter Program Budget Document Report 234 MR PRE combines all information for 4th Quarter Program Budget Document Report 235 MR Submit report to Attorney for review 236 MR Prepare for publications the 4th Quarter Program Budget Document Report 237 MR Submit 4th Quarter Program Budget Document Reports to Court 238 MR Primary leaders provide feedback to their secondary people regarding achievement reporting in the PBD Page 34 Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool % Complete 0% Scheduled Start Jul 12'97 Scheduled Finish Jul 12'97 Revised Finish Resource Names Program Managers 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Jul 29 '97 Jul 29 '97 Aug 12'97 Aug 16'97 Aug 26 '97 Aug 1 '97 FY98 Aug 4 '97 Aug 4 '97 Aug 12 '97 Aug 19'97 Aug 26 '97 Sep 1 '97 Lewis, Milhollen Lewis,PRE Clerical Jackson Lewis Jackson,Attorney Primary Leaders January 31 '97 JLittle Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool \"ID\" 239 Code MR Name SUBMIT MONTHLY MANAGEMENT REPORT (MANAGEMENT TOOL) TO COURT % Complete 58% Scheduled Start Jul 31 '96 Scheduled Finish Aug 31 '97 Revised Finish Resource Names Jackson 240 MR Submit July's monthly management report to Court 100% Jul 31 '96 Jul 31 '96 Jackson,Attorney 241 MR Submit August's monthly management report to Court 100% Aug 30 '96 Aug 30 '96 Jackson,Attorney 242 MR Submit September's monthly management report to Court 100% Sep 30 '96 Sep 30 '96 Jackson.Attorney 243 MR Submit October's monthly management report to Court 100% Oct 31 '96 Oct 31 '96 Jackson,Attorney 244 MR Submit November's monthly management report to Court 100% Nov 29 '96 Nov 29 '96 Jackson.Attorney 245 MR Submit December's monthly management report to Court 100% Dec 20 '96 Dec 20 '96 Jackson, Attorney Page 35 FY98 January 31 '97iir 246 Code MR Name ~ Submit January's monthly management report to Court Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool % Complete 100% Scheduled Start Jan 31 '97 Scheduled Finish Jan 31 '97 Revised Finish Resource Names Jackson.Attorney 247 MR Submit February's monthly management report to Court 0% Feb 28 '97 Feb 28 '97 Jackson .Attorney 248 MR Submit March's monthly management report to Court 0% Mar 31 '97 Mar 31 '97 Jackson,Attorney 249 MR Submit April's monthly management report to Court 0% Apr 30 '97 Apr 30 '97 Jackson,Attorney 250 MR Submit May's monthly management report to Court 0% May 31 '97 May 31 '97 Jackson .Attorney 251 MR Submit June's monthly management report to Court 0% Jun 30 '97 Jun 30 '97 Jackson.Attorney 252 MR Submit July's monthly management report to Court 0% Jul 31 '97 Jul 31 '97 Jackson.Attorney Page 36 FY98 January 31 '97Little Rock School District Program Planning and Budgeting Tool HT 253 Code MR Name Submit August's monthly management report to Court % Complete 0% Scheduled Start Aug 31 '97 Scheduled Finish Aug 31 '97 Revised Finish Resource Names Jackson 254 ORG REASSESSMENT OF PROCESS AND ORGANIZATION 1997-98 21% Jul 5 '96 Aug 30 '97 Jackson,Attorney 255 ORG Analyze, reassess, and revise planning organization and structure 0% Jul 5 '96 Jul 31 '97 Jackson,Roberts 256 ORG Revise, discuss and reach consensus regarding format and tasking of 1997-98 Management Tool 100% Jul 5 '96 Jul 24 '96 Cabinet, Lewis, Jackson 257 ORG Initial circulation of 1997-98 Management Tool 100% Jul 13'96 Jul 31 '96 Lewis,Jackson 258 ORG Evaluate tasking of 1997-98 Management Tool 35% Jul 24 '96 Aug 30 '97 Cabinet, Lewis Page 37 FY98 January 31 '971st Quarter ID 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Code PINV PINV PINV PINV PINV PEVAL PEVAL Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 2nd Quarter Name PROGRAM INVENTORY Identify and revise DSeg and NonDSeg Programs Review and adjust primary and secondary leaders for DSeg and NonDSeg Programs Finalize list of DSeg and NonDSeg Programs Generate a Program Inventory Report for 1996-97 PROGRAM EVALUATION Notify program managers that program evaluation begins in fall\nbegin data collection Critical Noncritical % Complete Jul | Aug | Sep ' Oct | Nov | Dec 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% F 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb I 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3r Jan 100% I I i i Progress  Milestone Summary Rolled Up O Page 1f ID 8 T Code PEVAL Name Review/revise process for cabinet review of program evaluations % Complete 100% 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec Jan 3rd Quarter I Feb I Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 9 PEVAL Review/revise program evaluation instrument 100% 10 PEVAL Conduct required training sessions describing the process and evaluation criteria for designated staff 100% 11 PEVAL Distribute program evaluation instruments and instructions to primary and/or secondary leaders: provide additonal information/instruments, if needed 100% I 12 PEVAL Program evaluations due from secondary or primary leaders 100% 13 PEVAL Review program evaluations (DSeg and NonDSeg) for programs needing extended evaluations 100% 14 PEVAL Finalize identification of programs needing extended evaluation 100% 3r Jan Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Critical Noncritical Progress  Milestone Summary V Rolled Up \u0026lt;\u0026gt; Page 2ID 15 Code PEVAL Name Notify appropriate staff to prepare Extended Program Evaluations % Complete 100% 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec I 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb I 4th Quarter Apr I May [ Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3r Jan 16 17 18 19 20 21 PEVAL PEVAL NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS 1 Extended evaluations due Cabinet review extended evaluations for merge into needs assessment report NEEDS ASSESSMENT Review types of data to measure needs of district for FY 96-97 Analyze results of the budgeting and planning priorities revealed from the 95-96 Needs Assessment Report Review strategic planning mission statement and goals of the District 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%  I I i I I I i I I Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Critical Noncritical Progress m Milestone  Summary Rolled Up O Page 3T ID 22 Code NEEDS Name STANFORD 8 TEST DATA STUDY % Complete 100% I 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb I Ma? 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3r Jan 23 NEEDS Define purpose and scope for Stanford 8 Test data study 100% I 24 NEEDS Assign responsibilities for study of Stanford 8 Test data 100% I 25 NEEDS Design data collection plan for study of Stanford 100% I 26 NEEDS Collect and analyze data from Stanford 8 Test (Fall 95 administration) 100% 27 NEEDS Prepare Stanford 8 Test Report 100% 28 NEEDS Submit Stanford 8 Test Report for merge into needs assessment 100% I i Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Critical Noncritical Progress  Milestone Summary V Rolled Up O Page 4ID 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 Code NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Name PRE EDUCATIONAL EQUITY MONITORING REPORTS SURVEY Define purpose and scope for PRE Educational Equity Monitoring Reports Study Assign responsibilities for PRE Educational Equity Monitoring Reports Study Analyze data from PRE Educational Equity Monitoring Reports Studies Prepare PRE Educational Equity Monitoring findings Submit PRE Educational Equity Monitoring Reports Study into needs assessment listing SCHOOL CLIMATE/HUMAN RELATIONS SURVEY (SC/HR)STUDY i Critical Noncritical % Complete 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep I I Progress M Milestone 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar Summary Rolled Up \u0026lt;C\u0026gt; Page 5 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun I I i [ I 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep Oct | Nov | Dec 3r JanID 36 Code NEEDS Name Define purpose and scope of SC/HR Survey % Complete 100% 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep I 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb I Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3r Jan 37 NEEDS Assign responsibilities for SC/HR data collections 100% I 38 NEEDS Design data collection plan for study of SC/HR 100% I 39 NEEDS Collect and analyze data from SC/HR Survey 100% 40 NEEDS Prepare SC/HR Survey Report 100% i I 41 NEEDS Submit SC/HR Survey Report for merge into needs assessment 100% 42 NEEDS PORPORTIONALS ALLOCATION FORMULAS STUDY 100% Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Critical Noncritical Progress  Milestone  Summary Rolled Up O Page 6ID 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 Code NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Name Define purpose and scope of Proportional Allocation Formulas Assign responsibilities for Proportional Allocation Formulas Design data collections plan for Proportional Allocation Formulas Collect and analyze data for Proportional Allocation Formulas Prepare Proportional Allocation Formulas Report Submit Proportional Allocations Fomiulas Study Report for merge into needs assessment listing DESEGREGATION MONITORING REPORTS AUDIT FROM PPM 1 Critical Noncritical % Complete 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep I I I i 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec I 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb I Ma? 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec I 1 3r Jan Progress h Milestone Summary Rolled Up O Page 7ID 50 Code NEEDS Name Define purpose and scope of Desegregation Monitoring Reports Audit % Complete 100% 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep I 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb I Ma? 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3r Jan 51 NEEDS Assign responsibility for data collection of transcripts and Desegregation Monitoring Reports Audit 100% I 52 NEEDS Design data collection plan for study of Desegregation Monitoring Reports Audit 100% I I 53 NEEDS Collect data 100% 54 NEEDS Review with Cabinet and Attorneys 100% 55 NEEDS Report findings to PRE, if applicable 100% 56 NEEDS Merge new obligations with Program Budget Document, if applicable (no new obligations) i 100% 1 Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Critical Noncritical Progress  Milestone Summary V Rolled Up O Page 8ID 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 Code NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS i Name COURT ORDERS AUDIT Define purpose and scope of Court Orders Audit Assign responsibility for data collection of Court Orders Audit Collect data Review with Cabinet and Attorneys Report findings to PRE Merge new obligations with Program Budget Document Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Critical Noncritical % Complete 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep I I Progress H Milestone 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb I Ma? Summary Rolled Up O' Page 9 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep I 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec f 3r JanID 64 Code NEEDS Name TOWN HALL MEETINGS % Complete 100% 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 65 NEEDS Define purpose and scope of Town Hall Meetings 100% I 66 NEEDS Review previous years data from Town Hall Report 100% I 67 NEEDS Review and data collection plan (matrix)for Town Hall Meetings 100% I 68 NEEDS Set locations and schedule for Town Hall Meeting 100% I 69 NEEDS Develop advertisement plan and schedule for Town Hall Meetings: Prepare sample agenda 100% I 70 NEEDS Execute advertisement plan for Town Hall Meeting I 100% Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Critical Noncritical Progress  Milestone Page 10 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar Summary V Rolled Up O 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3r Jan1st Quarter ID 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 Code NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Name 2nd Quarter Conduct Town Hall Meeting I Gather feedback data from Town Hall Meeting I for input into matrix Execute advertisement plan for Town Hall Meeting II Conduct Town Hall Meeting II Gather feedback data from Town Hall Meeting II for input into matrix Execute advertisement plan for Town Hall Meeting III Conduct Town Hall Meeting III Critical Noncritical % Complete 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Jul I Aug I Se^ Oct | Nov | Dec I I 3rd Quarter Jan 4th Quarter I Feb I Ma~ Apr | May | Jun I I I 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep Oct | Nov | Dec 3r Jan ! ! i Progress Milestone Summary Rolled Up  Page 11ID 78 Code NEEDS Name Finalize and publish Town Hall Meeting Report % Complete 100% 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 79 NEEDS Merge findings of Town Hall Meeting Report, 1996-97 into needs assessment listing 100% I 80 NEEDS DISTRICT DIALOGUES 100% 81 NEEDS Define purpose and scope of District Dialogues 100% I 82 NEEDS Review previous years data from District Dialogue Report 100% I 83 NEEDS Review data collection plan (matrix) for District Dialogues 100% I 84 NEEDS Set locations and schedule for District Dialogue Meetings 100% I Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Critical Noncritical Progress  Milestone  Page 12 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar Summary V Rolled Up O 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec I 3r JanID 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 Code NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS i Name Develop advertisement plan and schedule for District Dialogues\nprepare sample agenda Execute advertisement plan for District Dialogue l(Principals) Conduct District Dialogue I Gather feedback from District Dialogue 1 for input into matrix Execute advertisement plan for District Dialogue ll(Ass't Principals) Conduct District Dialogue II Gather feedback data from Distnct Dialogue II for input into matrix Project\nFY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Critical Noncritical % Complete 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep I 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb I Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3r Jan Progress  Milestone  Summary Rolled Up O Page 131st Quarter 2nd Quarter ID 92 Code NEEDS Name Execute advertisement plan for District Dialogue lll(Teachers) % Complete 100% Jul I Aug I Sep ~Oct | Nov | Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb I Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3r Jan 93 NEEDS Conduct District Dialogue III 100% 94 NEEDS Gather feedback data from District Dialogue III for merge into matrix 100% 95 96 97 98 NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Execute advertisement plan for District Dialogue IV(Admin. and Classified) Conduct District Dialogue IV Gather feedback data from District Dialogue IV for input into matrix Execute advertisement plan for District Dialogue VfTransportation) Critical Noncritical 100% 100% 100% 100% I I i I Progress h Milestone Summary Rolled Up O Page 141st Quarter 2nd Quarter ID 99 Code NEEDS Name Conduct District Dialogue V % Complete 100% Jul I Aug I Sep Oct | Nov | Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3r Jan 100 NEEDS Gather feedback data from District Dialogue V for input into matrix 100% 101 NEEDS Finalize and publish District Dialogue Report 1996-97 100% 102 NEEDS Merge findings of District Dialogue Report 1996-97 into needs assessment listing 100% I 103 NEEDS PREPARE NEEDS ASSESSMENT REPORT 100% 104 NEEDS Conduct Administrative review of available districtwide reports and objective data 100% I 105 NEEDS Review of available districtwide reports and objective data by Board 100% Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Critical Noncritical Progress  Milestone Summary V Rolled Up O Page 15 ID 106 Code NEEDS Name Publish Draft of Needs Assessment /Report and disseminate to selected persons % Complete 100% 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec I 107 NEEDS Publish Needs Assessment Report, 1996-97 100% 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb I Ma? 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3r Jan 108 109 110 111 112 GOALS GOALS GOALS GOALS GOALS Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 PLANNING AND BUDGET GOALS CABINET PLANNING SESSION Review 1995-96 Needs Assessment Report Distribute 1996-97 Needs Assessment Report to Cabinet members Distribute mission statement, goals and written priorities (strategic planning action plans) Critical Noncritical 38% 44% 100% 100% 0% K\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\N Progress M Milestone  I r  Summary V Rolled Up O I I Page 16ID 113 Code PDEV Name PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT % Complete 36% 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 114 PDEV SUBMIT BUSINESS CASE FOR PROGRAM AND/OR MODIFICATIONS TO SUPERINTENDENT 74% 115 PDEV Review process for program development 100% 116 PDEV Use extended program evaluations to identify program additions, modifications, deletions 100% 117 PDEV Notify appropriate staff to prepare Business Cases on results of extended program evaluations 100%  118 PDEV 119 PDEV Review recommendations from district needs assessment report in order to identify additional programs or programs modifications resulting in Business Cases due 100% 100% 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb I 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3r Jan I I i I Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Critical Noncritical Progress  Milestone Summary Rolled Up O Page 17ID 120 T Code PDEV Name Review of Business Cases by Cabinet % Complete 100% 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb I Ma? 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 121 122 123 124 125 126 PDEV PDEV BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97  1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3r Jan Submit Business Cases for program and/or program modifications to Board of Directors Review of Business Cases by Board BOARD RETREAT/BOARD WORKSESSION Determine date and site for Board Retreat Identify and establish agenda items for Board Worksession Identify materials for Board Worksession Critical Noncritical 0% 0% 87% 100% 100% 100% Progress  Milestone Page 18 I H  Summary Rolled Up OID 127 Code BUDGT Name Distribute materials for Board Worksession % Complete 100% 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3r Jan 128 BUDGT Conduct data analysis work session in preparation for Board Worksession 100% 129 BUDGT Conduct Board Worksession 0% 130 BUDGT Report outcomes of Board Worksession 0% 131 BUDGT BUDGETING 11% 132 BUDGT Develop budget preparation training materials 100%  133 BUDGT Conduct budget preparation training sessions and distribute instructions for budget preparation training at all levels 100% I Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Critical Noncritical Progress M Milestone Summary V Rolled Up O Page 19ID 134 Code BUDGT Name Budget managers develop and submit revised 1996-97 expense budget revisions and 1997-98 expense budget requests % Complete 100% 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb I Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3r Jan 135 BUDGT Begin districtwide expense budget consolidation and executive review process 0% 136 BUDGT Year to date revenue expenditure analysis 100% 137 BUDGT Revise financial forecast for coming year 0% I 138 BUDGT Submit proposed budget to Board 0% I 139 BUDGT Conduct Board Work Sessions on proposed budget 0% 140 BUDGT Revise proposed budget, as needed 0% Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Critical Noncritical Progress  Milestone Summary V Rolled Up O Page 20ID 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 Code BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Name Prepare tentative budget Board revievr of tentative budget Conduct Board Work Session on tentative Budget Account reconciliation and Purchase Order (PO) clean-up Receipt of state generated revenue numbers (payroll liabilities, adjusted supplemental payroll, last payroll, Carl Perkins, M to M, JTPA, Vocational Ed.,______ Close-out 1996-97 accounts: adjust physical inventory, (fiscal)federal grants, magnet, state grants, accruals Compute ending fund balance Critical Noncritical % Complete 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1st Quarter Jul [ Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3rd Quarter Jan 4th Quarter I Feb I Mar Apr | May | Jun I I I 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep I 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec I I 3r Jan Progress  Milestone Summary Rolled Up O Page 21ID 148 Code BUDGT Name Administrative review of final budget % Complete 0% 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep I 149 BUDGT Submit final budget to Board 0% I 150 BUDGT Board review and adoption of 97-98 final budget 0%  151 BUDGT Submit final Budget to Court/Parties 0% 152 BUDGT Submit 97-98 final budget to State 0%  153 BUDGT Staffing 0% ! i 154 BUDGT Review/adoption of changes in course offerings by Board 0% i Project: FY 98 Date\n1/31/97 Critical Noncritical k\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\N Progress H Milestone Summary V Rolled Up O Page 22 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec I 3r JanID 155 Code BUDGT Name Meeting with counselors and principals to review courses offerings 1996-97 % Complete 0% 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3r Jan 156 BUDGT Print secondary course selection sheets 0% 157 BUDGT Counselors meet with students and complete course selection sheets 0% 158 159 160 161 BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Counselors send course selection sheets to receiving schools Registrars tally course selections Review course tallies secondary. Note possible staffing changes based on courses requested Identify elementary enrollment (tentative) for 1997-98 i 0% 0% 0% 0% I Critical Noncritical KWWWWW Progress h Milestone  Summary Rolled Up Page 23 I iID 162 Code BUDGT Name 163 BUDGT Make determination by subject area (secondary) of possible changes and by projected elementary enrolled List known retirements, resignations, and intern positions % Complete 0% 0% 164 BUDGT Identify certified personnel for Reduction in Force (RIF), if needed 0% 165 BUDGT Notify certified personnel of Reduction in Force (RIF), if needed staff reduction 0% 166 BUDGT Recall certified personnel from RIF, if needed 0% 167 BUDGT Notify classified personnel of staff reduction 0% 168 BUDGT Recall classified personnel from RIF, if needed 0% Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Critical Noncritical 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep I i 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar Apr | May | Jun  I 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3r Jan k\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\N Progress  Milestone  Summary V Rolled Up O Page 24ID 169 Code BUDGT Name PROVIDE BROAD-BASED INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL FEEDBACK % Complete 0% 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 170 BUDGT Plan for internal and external feedback. Set locations and dates 0% 171 BUDGT Execute advertisement for district feedback, Session I 0% 172 BUDGT Conduct District Feedback Session I 0% 173 BUDGT Execute advertisement plan for district feedback, Session II 0% 174 BUDGT Conduct District Feedback Session II 0% I I 175 BUDGT Execute advertisement for district feedback, Session III 0% Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Critical Noncritical Progress  Milestone Summary V Rolled Up O Page 25 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3r Janf T ID 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 Code BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT BUDGT Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 I Name Conduct district feedback, Session III Execute advertisement for district feedback, Session IV Conduct district feedback. Session IV Execute advertisement for district feedback, Session V Conduct district feedback. Session V Execute advertisement for district feedback. Session VI Conduct distict feedback. Session VI Critical Noncritical % Complete 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct [ Nov I Dec 3rd Quarter Jan 4th Quarter I Feb I Ma~ Apr | May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3r Jan KWWWWsN Progress  Milestone Summary Rolled Up Page 26ID 183 Code BUDGT Name Execute advertisement plan for Town Hall feedback. Session I % Complete 0% 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar ~Apr | May | Jun 184 BUDGT Conduct Town Hall feedback, Session I 0% 185 BUDGT Execute advertisement plan for Town Hall feedback. Session II 0% I 186 BUDGT Conduct Town Hall feedback , Session II 0% 187 BUDGT Execute advertisement for Town Hall feedback. Session III 0% I 188 BUDGT Conduct Town Hall feedback, Session III 0% 189 SPLAN STRATEGIC PLANNING - IMPLEMENTATION OF APPROVED YEAR ONE ACTION PLANS 33% Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Critical Noncritical Progress  Milestone Summary V Rolled Up O Page 27 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep ! I i 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3r Jan 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter ID 190 Code SPLAN Name Conduct evaluation for year one % Complete Jul | Aug | Sep Oct | Nov | Dec Jan | Feb | Mar ~Apr | May | Juf? 0% 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3r Jan 191 192 193 194 195 196 SPLAN SPLAN MR MR MR MR Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Identify action plans for year two implementation Prepare for Implementation of site-based management (strategic plan) MONITORING AND REPORTING OF DESEG AND NONDESEG PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT REPORTS (1ST QUARTER: 2ND QUARTER\n3RD QUARTER\n4TH QUARTER) Revise written program budget document instructions, as needed Plan maintenance education and orientation regarding the program budget document process Distribute written program budget document instructions to principals and program managers Critical Noncritical 100% 0% 49% 100% 100% 100% I I Progress  Milestone Summary Rolled Up O  Page 28 I i I I I I1st Quarter 2nd Quarter ID 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 Code MR MR MR MR MR MR MR Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Name Conduct maintenance education workshops and orientation sessions regarding the program budget document process for principals, clerical staff, program managers, primary and secondary leaders______ 1ST QUARTER PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT REPORTS Review written program budget document with program managers and principals Carryout training sessions on the Program Budget Document Send reminder notice regarding deadline for entering 1st Quarter PBD activities Last day to enter activities for the 1st Quarter PBD PRE develops narrative and the Controller provides financial info for the PBD reports Critical Noncritical % Complete 100% Jul I Aug I Sep ~Oct | Nov | Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb I 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3r Jan 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% I I I f 1 I Progress H Milestone Summary Rolled Up O Page 29I ID 204 I Code MR Name PRE combines all information for the 1st Quarter Program Budget Report % Complete 100% 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec  3rd Quarter Jan I Feb I 4th Quarter tst Quarter Apr I May | Jun ~Jul | Aug | Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3r Jan 205 206 207 208 209 210 MR MR MR MR MR MR Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Submit report to Attorney tor review Prepare for publication of 1st Quarter Program Budget Document Reports Submit 1st Quarter Program Budget Document Reports to Court Primary leaders provide feedback to the secondary people regarding achievement reporting in the PBD 2ND QUARTER PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT REPORTS Advise program managers and principals on Programs Budget Document Critical Noncritical 100% 100% 100% 100% 60% 100% i Progress h Milestone I I I I i T I Page 30 Summary V Rolled Up -O'ID 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 Code MR MR MR MR MR MR MR Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Name Send reminder notice regarding deadline to enter activities for 2nd Quarter PBD Last day to enter activities for the 2nd Quarter PBD PRE revises narrative and the controller provides financial info for Program Budget Document Reports (DSeg and NonDSeg) PRE combines all revised information for 2nd Quarter Program Budget Document Reports Submit report to Attorney for review Prepare publication of 2nd Quarter Program Budget Document Reports Submit 2nd Quarter Program Budget Document Reports to Court Critical Noncritical % Complete 100% 100% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar I I I I 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun i 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec I I 3r Jan Progress  Milestone Summary V Rolled Up O Page 311st Quarter ID 218 Code MR Name Primary leaders provide feedback to their secondary people regarding achievement reporting in the PBD % Complete 0% 2nd Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep Oct | Nov | Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb I Ma? 4th Quarter 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter Apr I May | Jun Jul | Aug | Sep ~Oct [ Nov | Dec 3r Jan 219 MR 3RD QUARTER PRQGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT REPORTS 0% 220 221 222 223 224 MR MR MR MR MR Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Advise program managers and principals on the Program Budget Document Send reminder notice regarding deadline to enter 3rd Quarter activities Last day to enter activities for the third quarter PBD PRE revises narrative and the controller provides financial information for 3rd Quarter Program Budget Document Report PRE combines all revised information for 3rd Quarter PBD Report Critical Noncritical 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Progress H Milestone  Page 32 I I I I Summary Rolled Up C\u0026gt;ID 225 Code MR Name Submit report to Attorney for review % Complete 0% 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun I 226 MR Prepare for publication of 3rd Quarter Program Budget Document Report 0% I 227 MR Submit 3rd Quarter Program Budget Document to Court 0% 228 MR Primary leaders provide feedback to their secondary people regarding achievement reporting in the PBD 0% 229 MR 4th QUARTER PROGRAM BUDGET DOCUMENT REPORTS 0% 230 MR Advise program managers and principals on Program Budget Document 0% I 231 MR Send reminder notice regarding last date to enter activities 0% I Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Critical Noncritical Progress - Milestone Summary Rolled Up O Page 33 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep I I I 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec I I 3r JanID 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 Code MR MR MR MR MR MR MR Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Name Last day to enter activites for the 4th Quarter PRE develops narrative and the controller provides financial information for 41h quarter Program Budget Document Report PRE combines all information for 4th Quarter Program Budget Document Report Submit report to Attorney for review Prepare for publications the 4th Quarter Program Budget Document Report Submit 4th Quarter Program Budget Document Reports to Court Primary leaders provide feedback to their secondary people regarding achievement reporting in the PBD Critical Noncritical % Complete 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb I Ma/ 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun I 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep I I I I I 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec I I 3r Jan Progress  Milestone Summary Rolled Up O Page 34ID 239 Code MR Name SUBMIT MONTHLY MANAGEMENT REPORT (MANAGEMENT TOOL) TO COURT % Complete 58% 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 240 MR Submit July's monthly management report to Court 100% I 241 242 243 244 245 MR MR MR MR MR i Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Submit August's monthly management report to Court Submit Septembers monthly management report to Court Submit October's monthly management report to Court Submit November's monthly management report to Court Submit December's monthly management report to Court Critical Noncritical 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% I I 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec I I 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb I Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec I i I 3r Jan Progress H Milestone  Summary V Rolled Up O Page 35 I i I IU 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 Code MR MR MR MR MR MR MR Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Name Submit January's monthly management report to Court Submit February's monthly management report to Court Submit March's monthly management report to Court Submit April's monthly management report to Court Submit May's monthly management report to Court Submit June's monthly management report to Court Submit July's monthly management report to Court Critical Noncritical % Complete 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar I 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun I 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep I 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3r Jan K\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\N Progress  Milestone Summary V Rolled Up O Page 36ID 253 Code MR Name_______________________________ Submit August's monthly management report to Court % Complete 0% 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3rd Quarter Jan I Feb | Mar 4th Quarter Apr I May | Jun 1st Quarter Jul I Aug I Sep 2nd Quarter Oct I Nov I Dec 3r Jan 254 ORG REASSESSMENT OF PROCESS AND ORGANIZATION 1997-98 21% 255 ORG Analyze, reassess, and revise planning organization and structure 0% 256 ORG Revise, discuss and reach consensus regarding format and tasking of 1997-98 Management Tool 100% I I I I 1 I'Sl ORG Initial circulation of 1997-98 Management Tool 100% 258 ORG Evaluate tasking of 1997-98 Management Tool 35% I I 1 1 I i I I Project: FY 98 Date: 1/31/97 Critical Noncritical Progress  Milestone Summary V Rolled Up O Page 37 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I i ] 1\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcri_bcri-ohpc_50","title":"Rev. Betty Bock","collection_id":"bcri_bcri-ohpc","collection_title":"Birmingham Civil Rights Institute Oral History Project Collection","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Alabama, Jefferson County, Birmingham, 33.52066, -86.80249"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["1997-01-31"],"dcterms_description":["Rev. Betty Bock discusses her path to helping create a desegregated ministry in Birmingham after growing up in Missouri. She worked with community and spiritual leaders to form a new church after lacking support through First Baptist Church."],"dc_format":["video/mp4"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":null,"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["Civil rights movements--Alabama--Birmingham","Birmingham (Ala.)"],"dcterms_title":["Rev. Betty Bock"],"dcterms_type":["MovingImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Birmingham Civil Rights Institute (Birmingham, Ala.)"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://bcriohp.org/items/show/50"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Wallace, George C. (George Corley), 1919-1998","Arrington, Richard"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null}],"pages":{"current_page":440,"next_page":441,"prev_page":439,"total_pages":6797,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":5268,"total_count":81557,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"educator_resource_mediums_sms","items":[{"value":"lesson plans","hits":319},{"value":"teaching guides","hits":53},{"value":"timelines (chronologies)","hits":43},{"value":"online exhibitions","hits":38},{"value":"bibliographies","hits":15},{"value":"study guides","hits":11},{"value":"annotated bibliographies","hits":9},{"value":"learning modules","hits":6},{"value":"worksheets","hits":6},{"value":"slide shows","hits":4},{"value":"quizzes","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":40428},{"value":"StillImage","hits":35298},{"value":"MovingImage","hits":4529},{"value":"Sound","hits":3226},{"value":"Collection","hits":41},{"value":"InteractiveResource","hits":25}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"Peppler, Jim","hits":4965},{"value":"Phay, John E.","hits":4712},{"value":"University of Mississippi. Bureau of Educational Research","hits":4707},{"value":"Baldowski, Clifford H., 1917-1999","hits":2599},{"value":"Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission","hits":2255},{"value":"Thurmond, Strom, 1902-2003","hits":2077},{"value":"WSB-TV (Television station : Atlanta, Ga.)","hits":1475},{"value":"Newman, I. DeQuincey (Isaiah DeQuincey), 1911-1985","hits":1003},{"value":"The State Media Company (Columbia, S.C.)","hits":926},{"value":"Atlanta Journal-Constitution","hits":844},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":778}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"African Americans--Civil rights","hits":9445},{"value":"Civil rights","hits":8328},{"value":"African Americans","hits":5912},{"value":"Mississippi--Race relations","hits":5750},{"value":"Race relations","hits":5604},{"value":"Education, Secondary","hits":5083},{"value":"Education, Elementary","hits":4729},{"value":"Segregation in education--Mississippi","hits":4727},{"value":"Education--Pictorial works","hits":4707},{"value":"Civil rights demonstrations","hits":4440},{"value":"Civil rights workers","hits":3536}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966--Correspondence","hits":1888},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1815},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1709},{"value":"Baker, Augusta, 1911-1998","hits":1495},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1312},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1071},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":858},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":814},{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":719},{"value":"Mizell, M. Hayes","hits":674},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":626}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"name_authoritative_sms","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":2598},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1915},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1704},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1331},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1070},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":856},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":806},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":625},{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":605},{"value":"Snelling, Paula","hits":580},{"value":"Williams, Hosea, 1926-2000","hits":440}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Nobel Prize","hits":1769},{"value":"Ole Miss Integration","hits":1670},{"value":"Housing Act of 1961","hits":969},{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":853},{"value":"Memphis Sanitation Workers Strike","hits":366},{"value":"Selma-Montgomery March","hits":337},{"value":"Freedom Summer","hits":306},{"value":"Freedom Rides","hits":214},{"value":"Poor People's Campaign","hits":180},{"value":"University of Georgia Integration","hits":173},{"value":"University of Alabama Integration","hits":140}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":17987},{"value":"United States, Georgia, Fulton County, Atlanta, 33.749, -84.38798","hits":5437},{"value":"United States, Alabama, Montgomery County, Montgomery, 32.36681, -86.29997","hits":5151},{"value":"United States, Georgia, 32.75042, -83.50018","hits":4847},{"value":"United States, South Carolina, 34.00043, -81.00009","hits":4599},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":4328},{"value":"United States, Alabama, 32.75041, -86.75026","hits":3948},{"value":"United States, Mississippi, 32.75041, -89.75036","hits":2910},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":2580},{"value":"United States, Tennessee, Shelby County, Memphis, 35.14953, -90.04898","hits":2580},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":2536}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Georgia","hits":12823},{"value":"Alabama","hits":11313},{"value":"Mississippi","hits":10220},{"value":"South Carolina","hits":8493},{"value":"Arkansas","hits":4733},{"value":"Texas","hits":4399},{"value":"Tennessee","hits":3786},{"value":"Florida","hits":2602},{"value":"Ohio","hits":2403},{"value":"North Carolina","hits":1875},{"value":"New York","hits":1840}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1966","hits":10632},{"value":"1963","hits":10287},{"value":"1965","hits":10218},{"value":"1956","hits":9840},{"value":"1955","hits":9619},{"value":"1964","hits":9365},{"value":"1968","hits":9345},{"value":"1962","hits":9247},{"value":"1967","hits":8897},{"value":"1957","hits":8523},{"value":"1961","hits":8282},{"value":"1958","hits":8259},{"value":"1959","hits":8061},{"value":"1960","hits":7948},{"value":"1969","hits":7348},{"value":"1954","hits":7240},{"value":"1950","hits":7118},{"value":"1953","hits":6969},{"value":"1970","hits":6835},{"value":"1971","hits":6425},{"value":"1977","hits":6367},{"value":"1972","hits":6254},{"value":"1952","hits":6162},{"value":"1951","hits":6046},{"value":"1975","hits":5894},{"value":"1976","hits":5863},{"value":"1974","hits":5849},{"value":"1973","hits":5689},{"value":"1979","hits":5416},{"value":"1978","hits":5405},{"value":"1980","hits":5366},{"value":"1995","hits":4885},{"value":"1981","hits":4811},{"value":"1994","hits":4704},{"value":"1948","hits":4597},{"value":"1949","hits":4573},{"value":"1996","hits":4542},{"value":"1982","hits":4417},{"value":"1947","hits":4317},{"value":"1985","hits":4313},{"value":"1998","hits":4281},{"value":"1983","hits":4261},{"value":"1997","hits":4258},{"value":"1984","hits":4152},{"value":"1999","hits":4074},{"value":"1946","hits":4047},{"value":"1945","hits":4018},{"value":"1986","hits":4006},{"value":"1990","hits":3988},{"value":"1943","hits":3900},{"value":"1944","hits":3896},{"value":"2000","hits":3894},{"value":"2001","hits":3876},{"value":"1942","hits":3868},{"value":"1940","hits":3765},{"value":"1941","hits":3758},{"value":"1987","hits":3744},{"value":"2002","hits":3624},{"value":"1991","hits":3553},{"value":"1936","hits":3507},{"value":"1939","hits":3501},{"value":"1992","hits":3500},{"value":"2003","hits":3489},{"value":"1993","hits":3478},{"value":"1938","hits":3466},{"value":"1937","hits":3450},{"value":"1989","hits":3441},{"value":"1930","hits":3378},{"value":"1988","hits":3355},{"value":"1935","hits":3307},{"value":"1933","hits":3271},{"value":"1934","hits":3271},{"value":"1932","hits":3255},{"value":"1931","hits":3240},{"value":"2005","hits":3143},{"value":"2004","hits":2995},{"value":"2006","hits":2860},{"value":"1929","hits":2790},{"value":"1928","hits":2272},{"value":"1921","hits":2124},{"value":"1925","hits":2040},{"value":"1927","hits":2026},{"value":"1924","hits":2012},{"value":"2016","hits":2011},{"value":"1926","hits":2010},{"value":"1920","hits":1976},{"value":"1923","hits":1955},{"value":"1922","hits":1929},{"value":"2007","hits":1715},{"value":"2008","hits":1664},{"value":"2011","hits":1661},{"value":"2009","hits":1624},{"value":"2019","hits":1623},{"value":"2015","hits":1613},{"value":"2013","hits":1604},{"value":"2010","hits":1601},{"value":"2014","hits":1567},{"value":"2012","hits":1553},{"value":"1919","hits":1533},{"value":"1918","hits":1531}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"0193","max":"2035","count":506439,"missing":56},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"photographs","hits":10710},{"value":"correspondence","hits":9628},{"value":"black-and-white photographs","hits":7678},{"value":"negatives (photographs)","hits":7513},{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":4462},{"value":"letters (correspondence)","hits":3623},{"value":"oral histories (literary works)","hits":3607},{"value":"black-and-white negatives","hits":2771},{"value":"editorial cartoons","hits":2620},{"value":"newspapers","hits":1955},{"value":"manuscripts (documents)","hits":1692}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/","hits":41201},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":17721},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/UND/1.0/","hits":8830},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/","hits":7090},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/","hits":2186},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/","hits":1778},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-CR/1.0/","hits":1115},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","hits":145},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/","hits":60},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-RUU/1.0/","hits":51},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","hits":27}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Jim Peppler Southern Courier Photograph Collection","hits":4956},{"value":"John E. Phay Collection ","hits":4706},{"value":"John J. Herrera Papers","hits":3288},{"value":"Baldy Editorial Cartoons, 1946-1982, 1997: Clifford H. Baldowski Editorial Cartoons at the Richard B. Russell Library.","hits":2607},{"value":"Sovereignty Commission Online","hits":2335},{"value":"Strom Thurmond Collection, Mss 100","hits":2068},{"value":"Alabama Media Group Collection","hits":2067},{"value":"Black Trailblazers, Leaders, Activists, and Intellectuals in Cleveland","hits":2033},{"value":"Rosa Parks Papers","hits":1948},{"value":"Isaiah DeQuincey Newman, (1911-1985), Papers, 1929-2003","hits":1904},{"value":"Lillian Eugenia Smith Papers (circa 1920-1980)","hits":1887}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"John Davis Williams Library. Department of Archives and Special Collections","hits":8885},{"value":"Alabama. Department of Archives and History","hits":8153},{"value":"South Caroliniana Library","hits":4251},{"value":"Atlanta University Center Robert W. Woodruff Library","hits":4102},{"value":"University of North Texas. Libraries","hits":3854},{"value":"University of South Carolina. Libraries","hits":3438},{"value":"Hargrett Library","hits":3292},{"value":"Richard B. Russell Library for Political Research and Studies","hits":2874},{"value":"Mississippi. Department of Archives and History","hits":2825},{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":2785},{"value":"Rhodes College","hits":2264}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":81102},{"value":"Collection","hits":455}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":81360},{"value":"true","hits":197}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}