{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1136","title":"Little Rock School District, school board meeting minutes and correspondence","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["Little Rock School District"],"dc_date":["2002-01-02/2002-12-19"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Educational planning","School board members","School boards","School management and organization","Meetings"],"dcterms_title":["Little Rock School District, school board meeting minutes and correspondence"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1136"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nLITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT D { . U, I 3. 20(JL DESEGREJ[tCE OF ON MONITORING January 2, 2002 Ann Marshall, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Ms. Marshall: I am enclosing minutes of the LRSD Board of Directors meetings held on October 25, November 15, and December 6, 2001. Please let me know if you have any questions, or if I can provide additional information. Enclosures Sincerely, ~ Beverly J. Griffin Executive Assistant to the Superintendent 810 West Markham Street  Little Rock, Arkansas 72201  (501) 324-2012 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES SPECIAL BOARD MEETING January 10, 2002 The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held a special meeting on Thursday, January 10, 2002, immediately preceding the regularly scheduled agenda meeting in the Boardroom of the Administration Building, 810 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. President Baker Kurrus presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Baker Kurrus Judy Magness Tony Rose Mike Daugherty Katherine Mitchell RECEIVED JAN 2 9 2002 OFACEOF DESEGREGATION MONITORING MEMBERS ABSENT: Larry Berkley Sue Strickland ALSO PRESENT: T. Kenneth James, Superintendent of Schools Beverly Griffin, Recorder of the Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER II. President Baker Kum1s called the special meeting to order at 5:07 p.m. Five members of the Board were present at roll call\nMr. Berkley and Ms. Strickland were absent. Ex-officio representatives to the Board were also present: Dorothy Doolittle, teacher at Brady Elementary School, and Kory Lee, student at Parkview Magnet High School. PURPOSE OF THE MEETING The agenda for the special meeting included: A. Superintendent's Annual Evaluation - Contract Review / Extension B. Employee Hearings SPECIAL BOARD MEETING January 10, 2002 Page2 III. ACTION IV. The Board immediately went into an executive session for the purpose of conducting the Superintendent's evaluation conference. Ms. Magness made a motion for the executive session, Mr. Rose seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. They returned at 5:26 p.m. and reported that no action had been taken while in executive session. Mr. Rose made a motion to extend the superintendent's current contract for an additional year, which would change the contracted expiration date to June 30, 2005. Dr. Daugherty seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. Individual Board members commented on the favorable evaluation and review, indicating that Dr. James is doing a very good job during difficult times. Ms. Magness stated that they are proud of his leadership efforts, and optimistic about the future of the LRSD. Dr. Mitchell echoed the previous comments and noted that the Board could take credit for selecting the \"best person for the job.\" Dr. Daugherty stated that he was most impressed with Dr. James' ability to establish good rapport with Board members and staff. Mr. Kurrus thanked Dr. James for his hard work and leadership effo1ts, and said that he was certain Mr. Berkley and Ms. Strickland would also have favorable comments to make when they return. EMPLOYEE HEARINGS The employee hearings scheduled to be held at this meeting were postponed and will be rescheduled after the next regular Board meeting. IV. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 5:35 p.m. on a motion by Mr. Rose, seconded by Dr. Mitchell. APPROVED: 1  Jl/- 0~ H. Baker Kum1s, President LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES SPECIAL BOARD MEETING January 15, 2002 The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held a special meeting on Tuesday, January 15, 2002, 6:00 p.m., in the Boardroom of the Administration Building, 810 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. President Baker Kurrus presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Baker Kurrus Judy Magness Tony Rose Larry Berkley Mike Daugherty Katherine Mitchell Sue Strickland RECEIVED JAN 2 9 2002 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING MEMBERS ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: I. II. T. Kenneth James, Superintendent of Schools Beverly Griffin, Recorder of the Minutes CALL TO ORDER President Baker Kurrus called the special meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. All members of the Board were present at roll call. Teacher ex-officio representative, Dorothy Doolittle, from Brady Elementary School, was also present. The student representative did not attend. PURPOSE OF THE MEETI G The special meeting was called for the consideration of school closing options for the 2002-03 school year. SPECIAL BOARD MEETING January 15, 2002 Page2 Ill. ACTION Dr. James reviewed documents provided for the Board's consideration regarding potential school closures for the 2002-03 academic year. Board Policy FBC governs procedures and requirements for closing a school site:  Excessive cost of operation due to enrollment\n Excessive cost of renovation and repair due to age and physical condition of the facility\n Inability of the District to deliver the required curriculum in the facility\n Any applicablefederalcourt orders. It was also noted that the policy requires a twelve-month public announcement of the closure except in cases of extreme emergency. After a brief discussion, Dr. James recommended taking Dodd and Fair Park out of consideration for closure at this time and to allow those two schools to remain open for the 2002-2003 school year. Mr. Kurrus stated that allowing schools to remain open should not require any official Board action, and unless there was some interest by other Board members to take a formal vote, then the meeting would proceed with the understanding that these two schools are not a part of the recommendation for closure at this time. The Superintendent continued discussion of the recommended closure of the Residential Charter Program. Current enrollment in the Charter School was eighty-one (81) students as of January 14, 2002. Dr. James recommended that the Board revoke the Charter for this facility. Of the 81 enrolled, 33 are fifth graders and would be moving into a middle school in 2002-03. Forty-eight students are currently enrolled in first through fourth grades and the recommendation was to place these students back at their attendance zone/ area school. Mr. Berkley made a motion to approve the Superintendent's recommendation to close the Charter School Program housed at Badgett Elementary School. Mr. Rose seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. Dr. James proceeded with the recommendation to close Badgett Elementary School at the close of the current, 2001-02 academic year. He stressed the importance of making the decision to close the facility as soon as possible so that next year's registration and assignment process can be achieved smoothly and effectively. Dr. Mitchell noted that she was concerned that 78% of the students who currently attend Badgett Elementary School are transported there, negating concerns about it being strictly a \"neighborhood\" school. A number of the students who live in that area are currently bused out of the attendance zone, and only 45 of the students who attend there actually \"walk\" to school. SPECIAL BOARD MEETING January 15, 2002 Page3 Mr. Kurrus noted that he had recently driven from Badgett to Rockefeller, to Carver, and to Washington Elementary Schools to see for himself if there was a significant concern regarding transportation. Dr. Daugherty spoke in opposition to the closing of Badgett Elementary School. Regarding Dr. Mitchell's comments on current busing statistics, he noted there must be something significant to attract parents and students to that school, he noted the strong family support for the school, and stated there would be a burden of busing on these children. He also noted consideration for the neighborhood if the building is allowed to remain empty and decay. Mr. Rose asked the Board to emphasize that students who are reassigned from Badgett to another LRSD School will continue to be cared for in their new school and that we have the best interest of the children at heart. Ms. Magness made a motion to uphold the Superintendent's recommendation to close Badgett Elementary School for the 2002-03 school year. After brief discussion, and at the instruction of the District's Counsel, Ms. Magness offered an amendment to the motion to ensure clarity in the motion's intent, that the motion include the following excerpt from the Revised Desegregation and Education Plan, Section 3.7, Modification Standard: The LRSD Board of Directors determines: (i) that the educational benefits expected from such action substantially outweigh any adverse effects of the proposed action, (ii) that no practical alternative to the proposed action exists which will accomplish the educational objective, and (iii) that to the extent practicable measures will be initiated to counteract any adverse affects of the proposed action. Ms. Strickland seconded the amendment to the motion, and after brief discussion, the original motion was reworded to state specifically that Badgett Elementary School would be closed at the end of the 2001-02 school year. Ms. Strickland seconded the original motion as amended. A roll call vote was taken\nthe motion carried 6-1, with Dr. Daugherty casting the no vote. IV. ADJOURNMENT Prior to adjournment, Mr. Berkley noted that the Board would be required to look at additional budgetary reductions. He asked the Superintendent to discuss options for accomplishing this. Dr. James stated that a series of budget sessions would be held in conjunction with the regular agenda sessions. He noted that the meetings are held in public and are in the format of study sessions for the Board's deliberation. . . . SPECIAL BOARD MEETI G January 15, 2002 Page4 There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 6:35 p.m. on a motion by Mr. Rose, seconded by Ms. Magness. APPROVED: \\ -:lL/-0~ H. Baker Kurrus, President LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES REGULAR BOARD MEETING January 24, 2002 RECEIVED MAR 2 2 2002 OFACE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held its regularly scheduled meeting at 6:00 p.m. on Thursday, January 24, 2002, in the Boardroom of the Administration Building, 810 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. President Baker Kurrus presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Baker Kurrus Judy Magness Tony Rose Larry Berkley Micheal Daugherty Katherine Mitchell Sue Strickland MEMBERS ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: T. Kenneth James, Superintendent of Schools Beverly Griffin, Recorder of Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL President Baker Kurrus called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. All members of the Board were present at roll call. Dorothy Doolittle, teacher at Brady Elementary School, and Kory Lee, student at Parkview Magnet High School, served as ex-officio representatives to the Board for the month of January. II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS/ WELCOMING COMMENTS Mr. Kurrus made brief opening remarks and welcoming comments. He then introduced Dr. James for the presentation of citations. REGULAR BOARD MEETING January 24, 2002 Page2 Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS A. Superintendent's Citations Dr. James announced that the Arkansas School Boards Association had recently recognized two LRSD Board members as \"Master\" board members at the annual ASBA luncheon meeting. Mr. Berkley and Mr. Rose received plaques recognizing this achievement. In order to qualify for this distinction, a board member must attain at least 50 hours of continuing education and board member training through the ASBA. The Superintendent introduced Sandy Becker and Reverend Ray Williams to highlight some of the recent Sha ref est activities, which were coordinated through The Nehemiah Group. This group of ministers and church lay people coordinated a day of work in and around LRSD schools and campuses. Their work varied from minor clean up and painting, to planting, landscaping, construction and carpentry projects. Rick Caldwell is the Executive Director of Sharefest, and other members of the Nehemiah Group Leadership team attended the Board meeting, including Bill Elliff, D. L. Richardson, Dan Casey, Jay Blevins, Robert Lewis, Rod Loy, Steve Arnold, and Tracy Shelton. These gentlemen received certificates of appreciation for their efforts in making our schools safer, cleaner and friendlier for our students, parents, teachers and administrators. The final citations were presented to, Dorothy Doolittle, teacher from Brady Elementary, and Kory Lee, student at Parkview Magnet High School, for serving as ex officio representatives to the Board for the month of January. B. Partners in Education: New Partnerships Prior to recognizing the new partnerships, Debbie Milam invited Board members to attend a special showing for LRSD volunteers at the IMAX Theater this Friday night. She also reminded the Board that their volunteer hours are valuable to the District, and that the tally sheets are due to the VIPS office by March 19. She provided forms for submission of volunteer hours. The presentation of certificates in recognition of a new business I school partnerships are listed. Ms. Magness made a motion to accept the new partnerships, Mr. Rose seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. REGULAR BOARD MEETING January 24, 2002 Page 3 The new partnerships were: Carver Magnet School, represented by Diane Barksdale, in partnership with Miles Memorial CME Church, represented by Catherine Gill and other members of the church, including Willie Winston, Forest Brown, Thomas Brannon, Alberta Ewing, Gertrude Stubblefield, and Essie Brannon Mabelvale Magnet Middle School, represented by Ann Blaylock and Stella Cameron, in partnership with: Arkansas Skatium, represented by Jay Gaddy and Otter Creek Homeowners Association, no representative present Pulaski Heights Middle School, represented by Nancy Rousseau, in partnership with Burger King, represented by Jeffrey Williams LRSD Fine Arts Department, represented by Danny Fletcher, in partnership with KLRE / KUAR, represented by Tom Ross, Mary Waldo, and Clyde Snider C. Remarks from Citizens Dee White addressed the Board regarding her experiences with violence and discipline problems at Central High School. Her son was suspended from school for participating in an altercation with several other students. She believes that these students are members of a gang called the East End posse, that these students are responsible for the \"climate of violence,\" and that this group has targeted her son for retribution of previous incidents. She has removed her son from Central, and he is now attending a private boarding school in Mississippi. Prior to hearing from speakers, Mr. Kurrus asked the Board to consider a suspension of the rules to allow two students, Ted Fleming and Wells Harrell, time to speak. These students had not provided notification in advance, thus requiring a consideration of suspension of the rules. Mr. Rose moved to suspend the rules, Ms. Magness seconded the motion, and it carried unanimous!'{. REGULAR BOARD MEETING January 24, 2002 Page 4 Ted Fleming thanked the Board for allowing him an opportunity to speak on the topic of semester test exemption for seniors. Wells Harrell echoed Mr. Fleming's remarks and each of them each asked for the Board to reconsider the current semester test exemption policy for second semester seniors. The current policy requires good attendance and a high grade point average, in order to be exempt from some semester tests, but not all. Mr. Harrell stated that taking semester tests was nothing more than an additional stressor for students who were already studying for AP exams. They noted that by the time a student was in the 12 th grade, they had plenty of previous test-taking experiences. In addition, they noted that the majority of these students had already selected and/or had been accepted to college. They felt it was reasonable to allow students with perfect attendance and a high grade point average to be relieved of semester tests altogether. D. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association Clementine Kelley was present but did not have a formal report for the Board. - E. Joshua lntervenors No report. IV. REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. Remarks from Board Members Dr. Mitchell expressed appreciation to Jo Evelyn Elston for organizing and hosting the graduate follow-up luncheon in January. She noted that the students who attended represented varying groups, including some who were attending a 4-year college or university, some who were enrolled in two-year vocational training program, some who enlisted in the military, and some who had gone directly to work full time. She found the results of their follow up surveys to be interesting, and noted that the majority of the students did not feel that they were properly prepared to take tests in college. In addition, Dr. Mitchell reported that she had visited Mabelvale Middle Schoof and was pleased with the caring atmosphere and cooperative spirit of the faculty and staff. She noted that the warmth of the environment was very conducive to meeting the needs of the students. REGULAR BOARD MEETING January 24, 2002 Page 5 Ms. Magness stated that she had attended the same two events referenced by Dr. Mitchell. She spoke briefly on the Mabelvale Middle School breakfast meeting which was held to showcase the new magnet program that is being implemented there. In addition to Mabelvale, new magnet programs will be implemented at Cloverdale Middle School and at Fair and McClellan High Schools. Mr. Berkley reported on the Board's visit to the new Technology Center that is being constructed on the Metropolitan Vocational Technical Center campus. This center will improve the District's operations by housing the main frame equipment and all technology support staff. The center will improve technology districtwide, for students, parents, teachers and employees. He congratulated the technology committee members and all the individuals who have worked on getting this facility up and running. Ms. Strickland invited her fellow Board members to drive by the Otter Creek campus and look at the \"mess.\" She noted that although the parking lot is now an unfinished work in progress, the staff and residents of the Otter Creek community are happy that the work is being done and that the project is finally underway. Mr. Rose expressed appreciation to all departments within the District for their spirit of cooperation and teamwork. He stated that teachers and kids are at the heart of what we do, but that without the spirit of teamwork from the other divisions, we could not accomplish the task of serving our children. Mr. Kurrus noted that this was the beginning of a new semester and he thanked everyone for doing their best to make this a successful year. He expressed appreciation to Mr. Howard for the work that he has done at Central, and he stated he felt very comfortable with the education his daughter is receiving at Central High School. He noted that she feels very safe attending school at Central, and if there were any questions about safety, he certainly wouldn't send her there. He asked the viewers and the audience to \"be cautious about believing everything you hear\nif there is any question or doubt, you are invited to go see for yourself.\" Kory Lee, exofficio member of the Board, thanked the teachers and staff at Parkview for all they do, and he expressed appreciation to the Board for all the positive improvements going on at his school. REGULAR BOARD MEETING January 24, 2002 Page 6 B. Desegregation Update Mr. Babbs provided a brief report on desegregation and compliance issues. He informed the Board that Judge William Wilson had sent a letter, dated January 10, 2002, notifying all parties that he was reviewing documents and trying to come \"up to speed\" on the case. There are no court dates scheduled at this time. He reminded the Board of upcoming activities within the Student Registration office: open houses are being held this week and next in all schools, and open enrollment for new students, kindergarten students, magnet applicants and transfer requests begins next week through the first week in February. He and members of his staff will be attending a Neighborhood Connections meeting on Saturday to provide information and the Magnet School Fair will also be held on Saturday, January 26. In addition, Mr. Babbs reported that the Badgett and Charter School reassignment process had begun and that parents would be receiving individualized communications as needed during the transition process. Most of the attendance zone students will be assigned to Rockefeller and Washington. Charter students will be assigned to their current attendance zone schools, with the options of applying for reassignments, magnet seats, or m-m transfers. C. BudgetUpd~e Dr. Stewart reported that we are still waiting for additional information on county tax collections and on state equalization funding. Preliminary information does not look as good as we had hoped\nreal estate values had only increased by about 1 %, and personal property taxes were up 3% over previous year's collections. The delay on notification from the state is due to estimated revenue reductions and the governor has yet to announce the full impact of the revenue shortfall. We must reduce spending by at least $1.4 million, and possibly more. A budget workshop will be scheduled in the near future, depending on receipt of more current revenue and expenditure projections. Budget managers are still submitting their reports and proposals for reducing expenses. Dr. Stewart also reported that we had received approval on the last request for QZAB funding in the amount of $689,000, which brings our total allocation to a little over $5 million. He is anticipating that once the full lighting project costs are analyzed, we may be able to submit one more application for reimbursement funding. REGULAR BOARD MEETING January 24, 2002 Page 7 D. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects Mr. Goodman was present to review the printed report which was included in the agenda. In addition, he reported that several schools will be closed this summer for asbestos abatement and that schedule will be provided for review. He reported that the bids on construction at Hall High School were due on Friday, and should be finalized by the end of January. In addition, Mabelvale Middle School will be bid within 30 or 45 days. Construction is in progress now at Watson, Otter Creek and Jefferson Elementary Schools, as well as Mann Magnet. E. Internal Auditors Report Mr. Becker was present to review the report provided in the Board's agenda. He offered to respond to questions or provide additional information requested by the Board. V. APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS VI. A. Minutes Minutes from the regular meeting of the Board of Directors held on December 13, 2001, and from special meetings held on January 10 and January 15, 2002 were presented for review and approval. Dr. Mitchell made a motion to approve the minutes as presented. Mr. Rose seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. INSTRUCTIONAL SERVICES DIVISION A. LEA Capacity Building and Improvement Activities Grant - Skills Tutoring Program B. LEA Capacity Building and Improvement Activities Grant - IDEA Resource Grant Dr. Gary Smith asked for the Board's approval to submit applications for grant funding from the Arkansas Department of Education. The LEA Capacity Building for Improvement of Special Education Services would provide approximately $3,000.00 to serve students from our District who are incarcerated at Juvenile Detention Centers. REGULAR BOARD MEETING January 24, 2002 Page 8 The LEA- IDEA Resource Grant would supplement efforts to improve achievement on the Benchmark exams of students who receive special education services. The request is in the amount of $51,408.00. Ms. Magness made a motion to approve both of these grant applications. Mr. Berkley seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. C. Report: 2000-01 Little Rock Comprehensive Partnerships for Mathematics and Science Achievement Vanessa Cleaver and Dennis Glasgow prepared and presented the 2000-01 annual progress report of the Comprehensive Partnerships for Mathematics and Science Achievement grant of the National Science Foundation. Copies of the full report were provided for the Board's review. To highlight progress made by students as a result of this initiative, a video presentation of Baseline Elementary School faculty and students was shown. Eleanor Cox answered questions and discussed the reasons why the students at Baseline achieved significant improvement in overall test scores. Over a three-year period, districtwide improvement has been realized in fourth and eighth grade mathematics achievement test scores\nmore students are successfully taking and completing higher level mathematics courses (Advanced Algebra, Trigonometry, Calculus and Statistics)\nand more teachers are participating in professional development offerings. VII. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIVISION A. 2002-03 Student Calendar Dr. Hurley provided the proposed 2002-03 student calendar for the Board's review and consideration. The three Pulaski County school districts collaborated on the development of the calendar, and all three will begin school on August 19, 2002. The calendars are slightly different due to our use of five additional staff development days. The extended year calendar will be developed based on this proposal. Dr. Daugherty moved to approve the calendar as submitted\nMs. Magness seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. REGULAR BOARD MEETING January 24, 2002 Page 9 B. Personnel Changes Personnel items were presented as a part of the Board's agenda and the administration recommended Board approval. Dr. Mitchell made a motion to approve the personnel changes as presented. Ms. Strickland seconded the motion and it carried unanimousl'f. C. Discussion: Smart Choices I Better Chances Program Jo Evelyn Elston, Director of Pupil Services, provided a review of the Smart Choices I Better Chances Program that will be piloted at Cloverdale Middle School. This is a nationally recognized law education program for students in grades 6 though 12, which will teach students about the criminal justice system and the consequences of violating the law. The Arkansas Attorney General's office will serve as a partner to the LRSD in providing the program to our students. It is hoped that after the initial pilot year, the program will be expanded to include other middle level and high schools in the District. VIII. BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION A. Donations of Property The Board was asked to approve acceptance of recent donations to the District. Dr. Daugherty made a motion to accept the donations and Mr. Rose seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimousl'f. Dr. Daugherty read the list of items as noted in the following chart: DONATIONS SCHOOUDEPARTMENT ITEM DONOR Little Rock School District $3,000 cash to be used for high school restructurino Morgan C. and Judith 8. Magness Central High School $1 ,492 cash to Central's athletic Dr. Wesley Burks program for purchase of pants for the football team Forest Heights Middle School $500 cash to the Aviators Team to be Marfin \u0026amp; Melissa Thoma used at the discretion of team members Watering Stand, valued at $200 to the Athletic Deoartment at FHMS Bemberg Iron Works, Inc. REGULAR BOARD MEETING January 24, 2002 Page 10 DONATIONS: (continued) SCHOOUDEPARTMENT Franklin Elementary School Geyer Springs Elementary Pulaski Heights Middle School Woodruff Elementary School Little Rock School District 8. Financials ITEM A hearing machine with phone guards, stickers and audiograms, valued at $960 S 100 cash to be used to purchase holiday turkeys for needy families $1 ,000 grant to be used to purchase materials and supplies for Literacy Program CB-700 drug set complete with symbols and stands valued at approximately $1,900 $300 cash to be applied to the Accelerated Reader Program in the Name of Watkins Fulk, student S1 ,000 mini-grant to be used to purchase student and teacher incentives and classroom materials Monitary donations for the 2001 LRSD Convocation DONOR UALR Share America Children International Geyer Springs PTA Wal-Mart, Inc. Store #124 Mr. \u0026amp; Mrs. Jack Waggoner Morgan Stanley Dean Witter \u0026amp; Company, in the name of employee Marion Fulk - through the \"Matching Gifts to Education Program\" Wal-Mart, Inc., Store #124 Aerospace Education Center ($50.00) Bank of America Mortgage ($300.00) Cingular Wireless ($300.00) LR Teachers Federal Credit Union ($50.00) Pulaski Technical College ($300.00) Staples ($300.00) UALR ($50.00) VAL/C ($300.00) KATV ($500.00) Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark Law Firm ($500.00) Stephens, Inc. ($1 ,000) Mark Milhollen was present to review the financial reports printed in the Board's agenda and to respond to eiuestions. He noted that the report included the first six months of the fiscal year, and was noteworthy due to the funds received from the Pulaski County tax receipts in the amount of $43 million. He commended the Pulaski County Assessor's office for their diligence in collecting delinquent taxes this year. Mr. Rose moved to approve the reports as printed. Ms. Magness seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. REGULAR BOARD MEETING January 24, 2002 Page 11 IX. SCHOOL SERVICES DIVISION No items for consideration. X. DISTRICT OPERATIONS No items for consideration. XI. CLOSING REMARKS A. Superintendent's Report: Dr. James reported that he had attended a breakfast for prospective directors of the LRSD Foundation. Consultant, Pete Karabatsos, will be in Little Rock at the end of February to aid in the formation of the steering committee, and in the development of by-laws and articles of incorporation. Mr. Berkley serves as the Board's representative to the Foundation Committee. The Superintendent also reported that a representative from the Southern Regional Education Board (SREB) would be meeting with District employees to discuss further options for high school reform. A grant application has been made to SREB, which will cover the expenses associated with this initiative. All high schools will participate, as well as two middle schools as pilot sites. Linda Austin will coordinate a workshop for participants on upcoming staff development days. Dr. James announced that Athletic Department staff has been working with sponsors to move some of the high school basketball games to Alltel Arena and Barton Coliseum. He is hopeful that we can secure the bid to host a high school basketball tournament in the near future. XII. EXECUTIVE SESSION - EMPLOYEE HEARINGS At 9:10 p.m., Ms. Magness made a motion to convene an executive session for the purpose of conducting closed personnel hearings. Ms. Strickland seconded the motion and it carried 6-0. REGULAR BOARD MEETING January 24, 2002 Page 12 Dr. Hurley provided a summary report of the circumstances surrounding the non-renewal of contract for Pat Rollins, HIPPY Program aide. Ms. Rollins had been employed in the HIPPY Program for over two years, and had been written up several times for poor job performance, failure to complete required paperwork for HIPPY participants, excessive tardiness and absenteeism. It was noted that Ms. Rollins was not being \"terminated,\" but that at the end of her current contract, she was recommended for \"non-renewal.\" Marian Shead-Jackson, coordinator of the HIPPY Program provided documentation of the unsatisfactory performance, and had recorded 34 instances of tardiness, and 16 instances of failure to appear for 16 weekly inoffice conferences. Ms. Rollins denied ever seeing the documentation presented for the Board's consideration. She denied that she was a poor employee, but did not deny that she had an attendance and tardiness problem. She explained that she had a young child with medical problems, and noted that many days she waited for the child's school bus to arrive before leaving for work. Dr. James recommended that the Board support the decision of the supervisor to \"non-renew\" Ms. Rollins contract. Mr. Berkley made a motion to uphold the Superintendent's recommendation based on the facts presented by the administration. Ms. Strickland seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. On a second personnel issue, the Board agreed unanimously to accept a letter of resignation from Kathy Penn-Norman, effective June 14, 2002. Ms. Penn-Norman will remain on leave of absence pending the resignation date. XIII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Board, Mr, Berkley moved to adjourn at 10:30 p.m. Mr. Rose seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. APPROVED: ~ -1--r V 01--, H. Baker Kurrus, President To\ni~/f/?!l{ LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES SPECIAL BOARD MEETING February 12, 2002 RECEIVED MAR 2 2 2002 OFACEOF DESEGREGATION MONITORING The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held a special meeting immediately following the regular agenda session, on Tuesday, February 12, 2002, in the Boardroom of the Administration Building, 810 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. President Baker Kurrus presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Baker Kurrus Judy Magness Tony Rose Larry Berkley Mike Daugherty Katherine Mitchell Sue Strickland MEMBERS ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: T. Kenneth James, Superintendent of Schools Beverly Griffin, Recorder of the Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER President Baker Kurrus called the special meeting to order at 5:50 p.m., immediately following the regular agenda meeting. A quorum was stipulated without a roll call\nall members of the Board were present. Teacher ex-officio, Suellen DiMassimo, from Carver Magnet Elementary School, and student representative, Mary Rutherford, from Central High School were also present. II. PURPOSE OF THE MEETING The special meeting was called for the purpose of approving a resolution supporting the submission of a QZAB funding application, and for conducting personnel hearings. In addition, the Board agreed by consensus to suspend the rules for consideration of first reading on policy IKF, as recommended by administration. SPECIAL BOARD MEETING February 12, 2002 Page 2 Ill. ACTION A. QZAB Resolution Dr. Stewart presented a resolution authorizing a Qualified Zone Academy Bond (QZAB) municipal lease-purchase agreement, which will provide financing for the purchase of energy conservation measures. A copy of the resolution will be attached to these minutes. Ms. Magness made a motion to approve the QZAB application as submitted\nMr. Berkley seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. B. Revision to Policy IKF: General Graduation Requirements Mr. Rose made a motion to suspend the rules to consider action not previously noted as an action item. Ms. Magness seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. During the agenda session, Dr. Lesley asked the Board for immediate consideration and first reading approval of a revision to Policy IKF, General Graduation Requirements. The Arkansas General Assembly passed Act 17 48 during the 2001 session, which requ ires all students K - 9 to participate in one hour each week of \"physical training .\" This requirement cannot be accomplished in our district in the ninth grade without adding an additional course for physical education. Therefore, the emergency revision to the policy was required at this time and recommended by the administration. Ms. Magness moved to approve the revision to IKF on first reading\nMr. Berkley seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. The policy will be presented for second reading and final approval at the regular February meeting of the Board. EXECUTIVE SESSION: The ex-officio representatives to the Board were excused and the Board took a brief break prior to convening an executive session for the purpose of conducting employee hearings. Ms. Magness made the motion for the session, Mr. Rose seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. The actual hearings began at 6:15 p.m. Dr. Hurley provided background information for the termination of Forest Heights Middle School teacher, Ms. Jane Sharp. Ms. Sharp was present and was represented by Attorney Ray Baxter of Benton. Eloise Hudson, principal of Forest Heights Middle School, was also present. SPECIAL BOARD MEETING February 12, 2002 Page 3 The Board reviewed the written report presented by Dr. Hurley and heard information surrounding Ms. Sharp's conviction on charges of possession of a controlled substance in March 1999. As a part of a plea agreement, Ms. Sharp agreed not to teach in the public schools for a period of three years. Dr. Hurley reported that the recommendation for termination was based on the fact that Ms. Sharp reported that she had never been convicted of an offense against the law on her original employment application. Attorney Baxter called witnesses in support of Ms. Sharp's character\nPam Burton, principal of Howard Perrin Elementary School, and Betty Berry Gwatney, assistant principal at Benton High School and a former member of the Benton School Board. Mr. Baxter provided a copy of a court order indicating that Ms. Sharp's record had been expunged effective November 14, 2001. In addition, a second order dated January 4, 2001, was presented which specified that Ms. Sharp was given permission by the Court to return to the classroom. Ms. Sharp's application for employment in the LRSD was dated January 15, 2001. Ms. Sharp testified that she \"had a calling to teach,\" and that although she made more money working in the business sector, she wanted to do whatever was necessary to return to the classroom. She stated that she only applied for the teaching position in the LRSD after consulting with her attorney in order to be assured that she would not be in violation of any agreement made with the Court. Ms. Sharp was supported by testimony from Eloise Hudson, principal at Forest Heights Middle School, who said she would like to have Ms. Sharp return to work as a mathematics teacher in her building. Ms. Gail Pitts, Assistant Principal, was also present in support of Ms. Sharp, but was not called to testify. Mr. Baxter asked the Board to reconsider the recommendation of the administration and allow Ms. Sharp to return to the classroom. He stated that the fact her record was expunged should stand alone as evidence to support his request, and that the lawful purpose of the first offenders' legislation was to allow one-time offenders a chance to have their records cleared for future employment opportunities. The Board deliberated briefly and returned at 7:35 p.m. Mr. Berkley made a motion stating \"the facts of the case as presented by the administration are not supported by the evidence.\" Mr. Rose seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. Mr. Kurrus noted that this action would allow Ms. Sharp to return to the classroom and no further action was required as a result of the administration's recommendation for termination. Dr. Daugherty left the session at 7:40 p.m. SPECIAL BOARD MEETING February 12, 2002 Page4 The second hearing was to appeal the recommended termination of Mr. Frederick Williams, Day Treatment Classroom Teacher, at Henderson Middle School. Mr. Williams was represented by Attorney Marsha Barnes, who asked that the hearing be held in open session. Dr. Hurley provided copies of investigative reports of an incident at Henderson Middle School, wherein a student accused Mr. Williams of using excessive force during a classroom incident. LRSD Safety \u0026amp; Security officers interviewed witnesses who gave statements regarding the incident, including students and paraprofessional staff who were in the classroom at the time. Witnesses present for the Board hearing included Joann Humphries and Brenda Hunter, both paraprofessional classroom aides who were present at the time of the incident. The school nurse examined the student after the altercation and reported an abrasion on his right leg, a scraped knee, and a split on the inside of his lip. In addition, an investigator from the Arkansas Department of Human Services filed findings that \"an allegation of child maltreatment ... has been determined to be true .\" Neither of the aides who testified at the hearing reported seeing any injuries at the time of the incident. Mr. Williams submitted a written statement indicating that an altercation did occur, but that the student had used profanity, thrown a chair across the room, and had advanced toward him with a pencil in his hand in a threatening manner. In addition, Mr. Williams reported that the student had pulled on his vest in the process of losing his balance and falling to the floor. He contested the excessive force charge, and indicated that he only used the necessary amount of force to restrain a student exhibiting explosive behavior. Attorney Barnes asked the Board to reinstate Mr. Williams based on the facts presented. She stated that Mr. Williams had been trained to teach in a selfcontained classroom, but as a first year teacher, was not properly trained in the techniques of restraining disruptive or violent students. This training had been provided to the Henderson staff after Mr. Williams was suspended from his duties. The student involved in the altercation was not one of the students normally in Mr. Williams' class, but was only there for the administration of a standardized test. In addition, Ms. Barnes called attention to the written statements of the students noting that they were in conflict, as though everyone saw something different. She noted that both of the adults who were present indicated in their statements that the student was aggressive toward the teacher and that he thought at the time he was acting in self-defense, or in defense of the other students in the classroom. She closed by asking the Board to consider the possibility that the administration over-reacted to the situation, to take into consideration that Mr. Williams was a new teacher in a new program, and to give him another chance. SPECIAL BOARD MEETING February 12, 2002 Page 5 The Board deliberated briefly and returned at 10:55 p.m. Mr. Rose made a motion to reject the administration's finding of fact and reinstate Mr. Williams to his position. Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion and it carried 5-1, with Ms. Magness casting the \"no\" vote. I~ ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 10:56 p.m. on a motion by Mr. Berkley, seconded by Mr. Rose. APPROVED:J_  :)._ 8 . Q :)- H. Baker Kurrus, President Tony RoS: Secretary RESOLUTIO AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELNERY OF A QUALIFIED ZONE ACADEMY BO D MUNICIPAL LEASEPURCHASE AGREEMENT\nAND PRESCRIBING OTHER MATTERS PERTAINING THERETO BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of Little Rock School District of Pulaski County, Arkansas: Section 1. Qualified Zone Academy Bond. Little Rock School District of Pulaski County, Arkansas (the \"District\") desires to enter into a Qualified Zone Academy Bond Municipal Lease-Purchase Agreement (the \"Lease\") for the purposes set forth in AC.A. 6-20-402(a), including the purchase of energy conservation measures (the \"Project\"). The form of lease is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Section 2. Terms ofOZAB. Under the authority of the Constitution and laws of the State of Arkansas, including particularly A.C.A.  6-20-401 - 10, the Lease is hereby authorized and ordered delivered for the purpose of financing the Project. The Lease is being entered into as a qualified zone academy bond within the meaning of Section 1397E of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Lease shall be entered into on or before May 1, 2002. The Lease shall be registered with the Treasurer of the District and the Arkansas State Board of Education. The terms of the Lease, including but not limited to the principal amount of the Lease, the schedule of lease payments, lessee covenants and representations and the length of the Lease will be set forth in the Lease. Section 3. Ratification of Prior OZABs. The Board of Directors has previously authorized the execution and delivery of other Qualified Zone Academy Bond Municipal LeaseAgreements (the \"Prior Leases\"). The Prior Leases were delivered by the District to Bank of America, N.A. The Prior Leases were also entered into for the purpose of financing the purchase of energy conservation measures. The Prior Leases are hereby ratified, approved and confirmed. Section 4. Authorized Representatives. The following individuals are hereby authorized to execute any documents, including, but not limited to, any agreements in connection with investing moneys held by the Lessor, and any and all other documents as may be necessary and appropriate to fulfill the terms and provisions of this Resolution and the Lease: Donald M. Stewart Mark Milhollen Section 5. Provisions ofResolution are Separable. The provisions of this Resolution are hereby declared to be separable, and in the event that any section, phrase or provisions shall be held or declared to be invalid, such holding or declaration shall not affect the remainder of the provisions, sections and phrases of this Resolution. Section 6. Repealer. All resolutions in conflict herewith are repealed to the extent of such conflict. Section 7. Emergency. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its adoption. CERTJFICATE I, the undersigned, Secretary of the Board of Directors of the above District, certify the foregoing to be a true copy of a Resolution duly adopted by the Board at a Special (regular or special) meeting of the Board held on the 12th day of February , 2002. The Resolution appears in the official minutes of the meeting which are in my custody. At the time of the meeting the duly elected ( or appointed), qualified and serving members of the Board and their respective votes on the adoption of the Resolution were as follows: Vote Director (Aye. Nay, Abstain or Absent) H. Baker Kurrus Aye Judy Magness Aye Rony Rose Aye Larry Berkley Aye R. Micheal Daugherty Aye Katherine Mitchell Aye Sue Strickland Aye I further certify that the meeting of the Board was duly convened and held in all respects according to law\nthat to the extent required by law due and proper notice of the meeting was given to the members of the Board and to the public\nthat the meeting was open to the public\nthat a legal quorum was present throughout the meeting\nthat all other requirements and proceedings under the law incident to the proper adoption and passage of the Resolution have been duly fulfilled, carried out and otherwise observed\nand that I am authorized to execute this Certificate. CERT1FIED under my hand and seal of the District this 12th day of February 2002. (SEAL) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES REGULAR BOARD MEETING March 21, 2002 RECEIVED APR 3 O 2002 OFACE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held its regularly scheduled meeting at 6:00 p.m. on Thursday, March 21, 2002, in the Boardroom of the Administration Building, 810 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. President Baker Kurrus presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Baker Kurrus Judy Magness Tony Rose Larry Berkley Micheal Daugherty Katherine Mitchell Sue Strickland MEMBERS ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: T. Kenneth James, Superintendent of Schools Beverly Griffin, Recorder of Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL President Baker Kurrus called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Six members of the Board were present at roll call\nDr. Mitchell arrived at 6: 15 p.m. Cynthia Crawford, teacher at Chicot Elementary School, and Steven Nichols, student at Fair High School served as ex-officio representatives to the Board for the month of March. REGULAR BOARD MEETING March 21, 2002 Page 2 II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS/ WELCOMING COMMENTS Mr. Kurrus made brief opening remarks and welcoming comments. He introduced Dr. James for the presentation of the student performing group and citations. Dr. James introduced the choir from Pulaski Heights Elementary School. The students performed two choral selections. Their director, Adrian Westbrook, and Principal Lillie Carter were also present. Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS A. Superintendent's Citations Prior to the student performance, Dr. James introduced Allyson Pittman for recognition of her volunteer activities. Allyson, a student at Pulaski Heights Middle School, volunteers each morning in the kindergarten class at Pulaski Heights Elementary School. Allyson has been volunteering in Ms. Jimmie Lou Neal's class each morning for three years. Dr. James thanked her for her commitment to making a difference in the lives of these students. The Superintendent introduced Al Flanigan, head coach at Parkview Magnet High School, and the members of the Parkview Patriots basketball team. The Patriots won this year's 5-A championship. Present were Assistant Coaches, Zachary Burks, Jay Pickering, Art Johnson, and Lahoma Howard, and team members Tavarus Blanchard, Bradford Donley, Marcus Twillie, Terrance Akins, Rod Earls, David Kennebrew, Earnest Sweat, Jamal Anderson, Edmond Barnes, Robert Beach, Trey Sally and Mark Winston. The \"Safe Schools, Healthy Students\" program produced a video for middle school students which has been shown in all middle schools and continues to be broadcast on LRSD-TV, channel 4. Mary Paal, Director of this program, worked with the LRSD communications office staff and an independent video production company to develop the informational video. The Public Relations Society of America recently selected this video as the winner of the Prism Award in the area of Electronic Media. Dr. James displayed the Award and thanked staff members who worked on this production. Dr. James called attention to the Wall of Fame in the administration building lobby. This wall displays photographs of teachers in the District who have achieved special recognition over the past year in a variety of organizations. REGULAR BOARD MEETING March 21, 2002 Page 3 Ex officio representatives to the Board were presented with certificates of appreciation for their service during the month of March\nCynthia Crawford, teacher at Chicot Elementary School, and Steven Nichols, J. A. Fair High School student. B. Partners in Education: New Partnerships Prior to the partnership recognition, Debbie Milam announced that the second Parent Institute was scheduled for Saturday, April 6, 2002 at Southwest Middle School. They are preparing for approximately 200 attendees. In addition, Ms. Milam announced the date for the annual Evening for the Stars. It will be held on Tuesday, April 23, 2002, from 5:30 - 7:30 p.m. at the Arkansas State Fairgrounds. Also, a Parent Involvement meeting has been scheduled for Tuesday, April 30 at Parkview Magnet High School. Additional information on all these activities will be provided at a later date. Ms. Milam presented certificates in recognition of new business/ school partnerships as noted below. Ms. Magness made a motion to accept the new partnerships, Mr. Rose seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. The new partnerships were:  Accelerated Learning Center, represented by Carol Green and Barbara Coakley, in partnership with: Apex Hospitality, represented by Angela Smith Royal Coach and Tour, represented by L. M. White Arkansas Electric Cooperatives, represented by Don Parrish Sam's Club #8104, represented by Sara Webster Coca Cola Bottling Company, represented by Rusty Campbell C. Remarks from Citizens Tamidra Mason addressed the Board regarding the HIPPY program and possible budget reductions. She related the positive experiences she and her child have had during her two years with HIPPY, and she asked the Board to consider the impact of reducing funding to this early childhood program. Amanda Gray serves as a German teacher at Hall and Parkview High Schools. She asked the Board to reconsider the possibility of reducing the budget for foreign language services to students. She noted that most of these students need the foreign language credits in order to qualify for the colleges they want to attend and reductions would have a very negative impact for these students. REGULAR BOARD MEETING March 21, 2002 Page4 Ms. Gray made several suggestions for alternate budgetary consideration including the athletic program, transportation costs, stipends and study hall. Jennifer Lusk, also a German teacher at Parkview, reported on her participation in the Unitown Program. Unitown provides students an opportunity to talk about what they feel they need to excel and succeed in the classroom thus providing teachers an opportunity to hear directly from the students' perspective. She asked that the Board look closely at programs that are not working before they begin making reductions to the budgets of the programs that directly impact and benefit the children. D. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association Frank Martin addressed the Board and made reference to possible staffing reductions and contract provisions for notification when there are expected reductions. He noted that contracts for the District's support staff have been finalized, and he asked the Board to review these contracts and ratify them. In addition, Mr. Martin referred to an arbitration issue that has not been concluded as directed by the arbitrator. He asked the Board to ensure that the administration has considered this issue and reinstate the individual as recommended by the arbitrator. E. Joshua lntervenors No report. IV. REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. Remarks from Board Members Ms. Magness asked Bill Goodman to make a brief presentation in honor of Harold Engstrom, former LRSD Board Member. Mr. Engstrom served from 1955 - 1958, and was on the Board when Central High School was ordered closed by Governor Faubus. Mr. Engstrom recently passed away, and Jim Engstrom prepared a script in honor of his father, which was read by Mr. Goodman. Dr. Mitchell expressed gratitude for the support of her LRSD family and friends in establishing a scholarship fund for future Philander Smith College students. She also thanked everyone for their support and prayers during the time of her sister's illness. REGULAR BOARD MEETING March 21, 2002 Page 5 Dr. Daugherty thanked Mr. Goodman for his presentation honoring Mr. Engstrom and noted that it is important to remember the sacrifices made by Board members and their families during times of crisis, as in the 1957-58 school years. Mr. Kurrus expressed condolences to Dr. Mitchell for the loss of her sister and thanked her for coming to the Board meeting during this difficult time. He also expressed high regard for Mr. Engstrom and for Judge Henry Woods, who also recently died. Mr. Kurrus stated that he was proud that his mother had served on the Women's Emergency Committee in the late '50's. In addition, Mr. Kurrus complimented the ODM staff on their latest report on enrollment in the three districts, but took exception to the statements in the report that noted the numbers of students we have lost over the years 1987 - 2001. He reaffirmed his personal commitment to desegregated education and to neighborhood schools. He stated that he wants the LRSD to \"embrace our diversity\" and he invited the public to join us. Mr. Berkley concurred with Mr. Kurrus' statements and stated that the revised plan and the return to neighborhood schools was a concept embraced by the community. The LRSD's commitment to quality neighborhood schools is intended to make our schools more attractive to our patrons. B. Desegregation Update Mr. Babbs thanked Mr. Kurrus and Mr. Berkley for their statements and said that it is important for us to remain mindful of the commitments made to the public in the revised desegregation and education plan. He noted that the District's patrons are supportive of the neighborhood school configuration, and that as they become more familiar with attendance zone schools the District's enrollment will be impacted positively. In addition, Mr. Babbs noted that applications for the District's four-year-old, Pre-K enrollment are in process, and are to be mailed on April 12. Special transfer requests are being considered and letters notifying parents will be mailed on March 28. C. Budg~Upd~e No report. REGULAR BOARD MEETING March 21, 2002 Page 6 D. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects Mr. Goodman reported, noting that his written report was provided as part of the agenda. In addition, he reported that construction projects at Cloverdale Middle School, Franklin Elementary School, and Hall High School would begin next week, and that the media center project at Terry Elementary would be bid on April 10. E. Internal Auditors Report The Internal Auditors' Report was printed as part of the Board's agenda. Mr. Becker was present, but provided no additional information. E. Technology Update Ms. Neal was present and reviewed briefly the report printed in the Board's agenda. She noted that the new telephone systems were operational at Metropolitan and at the administration building. Three more locations are to be switched over to the new system next week, and the phone numbers are posted on the LRSD website as they become effective. The Board took a brief recess and reconvened at 7:25 p.m. V. APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS A. Minutes Minutes from the regular meeting of the Board of Directors held on February 28, 2002 were presented for review and approval. Dr. Daugherty made a motion to approve the minutes as presented. Mr. Rose seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. B. Resolution Mr. Rose presented a resolution supporting the Pennbrook- Cloverhill Neighborhood Association's efforts to have the City of Little Rock install a traffic light at Henderson Magnet School on Barrow Road. Mr. Rose made a motion to approve the resolution as read, Ms. Magness seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. The original resolution will be mailed to Mayor Dailey, and a copy will be attached to these minutes. REGULAR BOARD MEETING March 21, 2002 Page 7 VI. INSTRUCTIONAL SERVICES DIVISION A. Grant Proposal - Arkansas Better Chance The Board was asked to approve the submission of an application for grant funding in early childhood programs. Pat Price, Linda Austin and Bonnie Lesley collaborated in the preparation of a proposal which will provide $273,358.00 from the Arkansas Department of Human SeNices, Division of Early Childhood Education, under the terms of the Arkansas Better Chance Program, Act 212 of 1991 and Act 1132 of 1997. The proposal requires a District match in the amount of 40% of the total proposed budget. Ms. Magness made a motion to approve the grant application, Dr. Daugherty seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. VII. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIVISION A. Personnel Changes Personnel items were presented as a part of the Board's agenda and the administration recommended Board approval. Dr. Daugherty made a motion to approve the personnel changes as presented. Mr. Berkley seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. VIII. BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION A. Donations of Property The Board was asked to approve acceptance of recent donations to the District. Mr. Rose made a motion to accept the donations, Ms. Magness seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. Mr. Rose read the list of items as noted in the following chart: DONATIONS SCHOOUDEPARTMENT ITEM DONOR Booker Arts Magnet School Folk Art and Country Sampler Charlie Huie/ Country Cupboard Engagement Calendars for teachers, \"Cookie Joys\" to be used as refreshments for staff development activities. Total value of donation $717.00 Pulaski Heights Elementary School 300 National Geographic magazines Doug Eaton to be used in the library, valued at aooroximately $624.00 REGULAR BOARD MEETING March 21, 2002 Page 8 DONATIONS: (continued) SCHOOL/DEPARTMENT ITEM DONOR Pulaski Heights Elementary School Rainforest rug, to be used in the Lisenne Rockefeller library, valued at $453.22 Little Rock School District $500.00 cash to be used to offset Major Sports Association costs associated with the Parkview / Central basketball game at Alltel Arena $250.00 cash to be used to offset Wendy's - Fourjay L.L.C. costs associated with the Parkview / Central basketball game at Alltel Arena Compaq Presario 141 0 monitor, Linda Friedlier keyboard and Canon Bubblejet 210 printer to be used where needed, valued at approximately $100.00 B. Financial Report Mr. Milhollen was present to review the financial report printed in the Board's agenda. He noted that the report compares the first eight months of this fiscal year with the same time period last year. In addition, he noted that the annual audit report, which was presented at the last board meeting, is now available for review on the District's website. Ms. Magness made a motion to approve the reports as submitted. Mr. Berkley seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. C. Budget Adjustments Dr. James presented the proposed listing of budget reductions for the Board's consideration and discussion. These items had been presented previously at the agenda meeting and at a budget work session, and Board members had provided feedback and comment as the list was finalized. The items presented would result in a reduction in spending in the amount of $4.5 million, and Dr. James noted that this did not include any elimination of programs. Additional adjustments will have to be made as the enrollment figures are finalized and classes are formed, but these are usual adjustments that ensure appropriate class size ratios. Ms. Magness made a motion to adopt and approve the budget reductions as submitted. Mr. Rose seconded the motion and it carried unanimously by a roll call vote. REGULAR BOARD MEETING March 21, 2002 Page 9 Board members commented on the process of deciding how these budget reductions would be implemented and expressed appreciation to the Superintendent and staff for their hard work. They expressed appreciation that cuts were made as far as possible from the students, and that as the changes take effect they will be monitored so that the instructional environment would not be adversely affected . Dr. Mitchell expressed hope that the State will eventually restore funding to school districts across the state, and at that time some of the areas reduced would be returned to their previous levels of funding. Ms. Strickland noted that the reductions were made at all levels so that no one area or department was forced to take \"a major hit.\" No reductions were made in teacher salaries, and it was noted that they would be funded at the rate agreed in the negotiated contracts. IX. SCHOOL SERVICES DIVISION No items for consideration. X. DISTRICT OPERATIONS A. Easement: City of Little Rock/ Mabelvale Middle School B. Easement: City of Little Rock/ Franklin Elementary School Mr. Eaton presented two requests for easements by the City of Little Rock. The first request provides for road maintenance at Mabelvale Middle School. The request will allow for expansion and widening of Mabelvale Road, and will not impact day-to-day operations of the school. The second submission provides an easement for a drainage structure that will pass diagonally across the playground at Franklin Elementary School. Once the project is complete, it will not impact the operation of the school or interfere with use of the play area. Mr. Rose made a motion to approve both of these easement requests by the City of Little Rock. Ms. Magness seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. REGULAR BOARD MEETING March 21, 2002 Page 10 XI. CLOSING REMARKS A. Superintendent's Report: Dr. James reported that the second LRSD Foundation meeting had been held and that the board members had approved articles of incorporation and bylaws. The documents will be submitted to our attorneys for review and comment. The group reviewed the process for grant applications, and members of Dr. Lesley's staff provided valuable information and assistance. The Superintendent announced that Vicki Saviers will serve as the Director, and he reported that they are seeking additional people to serve on the board in hopes of eventually consisting of 35 members. XIII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Board, Mr. Berkley moved to adjourn at 7:43 p.m. Dr. Daugherty seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. APPROVED: l/-J5- 0)\n44. 'f?r.L Wvi1it0/ H. Baker Kurrulfresident Resolution Supporting the Installation of A Traffic Light at Henderson Health Sciences Magnet Middle School WHEREAS the Pennbrook -Cloverhill Neighborhood Association has often requested that the City of Little Rock install a traffic light at Henderson, and WHEREAS the City has accepted the Neighborhood Association's contention that the necessary traffic for installing the light is present, and WHEREAS heavy pedestrian traffic and vehicular traffic near Henderson can be expected twice a day, and WHEREAS the safety of the children of the City is paramount in the hearts of the involved parties, THEREFORE, we, the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District, call upon the City of Little Rock to pursue the installation of a traffic light on Barrow Road at the entrance to Henderson Health Science Magnet Middle School. Dated this 21st day of March, 2002. H. Baker Kurrus, President ,'~ ~ / TonyROS: Secretary LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES SPECIAL BOARD MEETING April 11, 2002 RECEIVED APR 3 O 2002 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held a special meeting on Thursday, April 11, 2002, in the Boardroom of the Administration Building, 810 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. President Baker Kurrus presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Baker Kurrus Judy Magness Tony Rose Larry Berkley Katherine Mitchell Sue Strickland MEMBERS ABSENT: Mike Daugherty ALSO PRESENT: T. Kenneth James, Superintendent of Schools Beverly Griffin, Recorder of the Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER Vice President Judy Magness called the special meeting to order at 5:03 p.m. Five members of the Board were present at roll call\nMr. Kurrus arrived at 5: 17 p.m. and Dr. Daugherty was absent. Kathy Daneshmandi, teacher ex-officio representative from Cloverdale Elementary School, and Amy Blackwell, student ex-officio from Hall High School, were also present. II. PURPOSE OF THE MEETING The agenda for the special meeting follows: I. Personnel Actions A. McClellan Football Coach B. Summer School Principals II. Student Hearing SPECIAL BOARD MEETING April 11, 2002 Page2 Ill. ACTION Ms. Magness called the meeting to order at 5:03 p.m. A quorum was stipulated without a roll call. Four members of the Board were present\nDr. Mitchell arrived at 5:15 p.m., Mr. Kurrus arrived at 5:17 p.m., and Dr. Daugherty was absent. Personnel Actions A. McClellan Football Coach Dr. James presented a recommendation to employ Bryan Hutson as the head football coach at McClellan High School. Mr. Berkley made a motion to approve the Superintendent's recommendation, Ms. Strickland seconded the motion and it carried 4-0. B. Summer School Principals The Superintendent presented recommendations for summer school principalships at the middle and high school levels. Sherry Rogers was recommended to serve as the summer school principal at Pulaski Heights Middle School\nJerome Farmer was recommended for the position at Parkview High School. Mr. Berkley moved to approve the recommended assignments. Mr. Rose seconded the motion and it carried 4-0. The Board recessed at 5:08 p.m. to conduct the agenda session. They reconvened at 6:15 p.m. to conduct a closed student hearing. Student Hearing Mr. Kurrus convened the hearing by noting that the Board had read information provided to them and that they were ready to hear facts related to allegations made against Matthew \"Tommy\" Ransom. Mr. Kurrus read the written report provided by the school administration. Tommy was an eighth grade student at Mann Magnet Middle School and was recommended for expulsion on January 2, 2002. The charges were terroristic threatening, sexual assault, and battery. Since being expelled from Mann, Tommy has been enrolled in an alternative classroom (CIC). Tommy was represented by Attorney Teresa Caldwell and was accompanied by his mother, Sandy Matthews Ransom, and his grandfather. Linda Watson, student hearing officer, and Jim Fullerton, principal at Mann Middle School were present as witnesses to the investigation. The District's attorney, Clay Fendley, was also present. SPECIAL BOARD MEETING April 11, 2002 Page 3 The administration's summary report indicated that the parents of Samantha Hogan and Ashley Garrison notified Mr. Fullerton on January 2, 2002, that Tommy Ransom had threatened Samantha and Ashley on numerous occasions. The allegations were listed as harassment, assault, battery, and terroristic threatening. On this same date, Mr. Fullerton began a full investigation of the allegations by calling in witnesses identified by Samantha and Ashley. He also notified Tommy's mother of the accusations. Samantha Hogan was present for the Board hearing, accompanied by her parents. She stated that the offenses had occurred over several months, and that she did not report them sooner to Mr. Fullerton because she was embarrassed to do so, and felt that reporting the incidents might make matters worse. She read the written statement that she provided to Mr. Fullerton at the beginning of his formal investigation, and admitted that other students who were named as witnesses had encouraged her to report to Mr. Fullerton earlier. Copies of written statements from student witnesses were provided for the Board's review. Ms. Caldwell formally noted her objection to the Board's receipt of the transcript from the hearings held in Dr. Watson's office. She questioned Samantha about her friendship with Tommy and asked her to name other students who might have overheard Tommy threatening her. Ms. Caldwell called witnesses to Tommy's previous behavior and demeanor at school. Charles Moore, mathematics teacher, and Susan Nichols, drama teacher, each testified that they had not observed inappropriate conduct from Tommy during class time. He was described as \"typical eighth grade ... playful, bright, outgoing, creative, talented, friendly, helpful and trusted.\" Each of these teachers had also taught Samantha and described her as \"quiet in class, friendly.\" Ms. Caldwell called as a witness Mary Ann Nolley, who also is an eighth grade student at Mann. She reported that she had known Tommy for three years and that he was her friend. She testified that she got the impression that Tommy was a friend of Samantha and Ashley because she had seen them during the school day, between classes and in theater class, and that they seemed to be good friends on good terms. Mr. Fullerton was called to respond to questions from the perspective of his investigation. He noted that Tommy had not been in serious trouble before this incident, and that he had previously convinced Ms. Ransom to allow Tommy to remain at Mann when she once considered having him transferred to another school. When asked about any reasons why these girls may have delayed reporting the incidents, Mr. Fullerton said that perhaps the girls were ashamed, but perhaps the behaviors just became more offensive as time went on. SPECIAL BOARD MEETING April 11, 2002 Page4 Ms. Caldwell called Ms. Ransom to testify as to her notification of the allegations and other circumstances relating to these incidents. She stated her first official notification was from Mr. Fullerton on January 2, but that her son had a \"face-off' with members of the Hogan family at a mall over the holidays. She stated that Mr. Hogan had threatened Tommy at that time. Ms. Ransom reported that Tommy had excellent grades and citizenship throughout his school years and that she had never known her son to be disrespectful. He was active in theater productions and had been selected to be the lead actor in the school play. She said that Tommy had always had more girls as friends than boys, and that he was not a bully. Ms. Caldwell asked Tommy to come forward and provide his statement. He said that Mr. Fullerton had never asked him to give his side of the story. He reported that he had five classes with Samantha and three classes with Ashley and that he thought they were all friends. He reported that the \"name-calling\" he was accused of was mutual, and that he had never threatened to rape or kill the girls. He stated that he was innocent of all the accusations, and that he knows you are not supposed to horseplay at school. When asked why these girls would accuse him of these actions, he said that he \"did not know why they were trying to destroy him,\" that he thought they were his \"best friends.\" The Board took a brief recess and went into deliberations at 8:25 p.m. They returned from closed session at 9:05 p.m. and reported that no action had been taken in recess.  Mr. Berkley made a motion in favor of the findings of fact presented by Dr. Watson. Ms. Magness seconded the motion and it carried 4-0. As for punitive action, the Board asked the Superintendent to recommend sanctions based on the background information presented. Specifically, that Tommy had no prior disciplinary sanctions, and had consistently good grades. Dr. James recommended that Tommy be removed from Mann and placed in an alternative setting for the remainder of this school year. Mr. Rose made a motion to uphold the superintendent's recommendation\nMs. Magness seconded the motion. Ms. Caldwell asked for the Board to consider allowing Tommy to remain at the CIC where he has been attending school since January. By consensus, the Board agreed to stipulate that Dr. Watson may determine the best placement options for Tommy. The motion, as amended, carried unanimously. SPECIAL BOARD MEETING April 11, 2002 Page 5 IV. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 9:15 p.m. on a motion by Ms. Magness, seconded by Mr. Berkley. APPROVED: 'f  J-5~ 0 )- M.\u0026amp;ftv~ H. Baker Kurrus, President LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES REGULAR BOARD MEETING April 25, 2002 RECEIVED MAY 2 9 2002 OFACEOF DESEGREGATION MONITORING The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held its regularly scheduled meeting at 6:00 p.m. on Thursday, April 25, 2002, in the Boardroom of the Administration Building, 810 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. President Baker Kurrus presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Baker Kurrus Judy Magness Tony Rose Larry Berkley Katherine Mitchell MEMBERS ABSENT: Micheal Daugherty Sue Strickland ALSO PRESENT: T. Kenneth James, Superintendent of Schools Beverly Griffin, Recorder of Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL II. President Baker Kurrus called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Five members of the Board were present at roll call\nDr Daugherty and Ms. Strickland were absent. Kathy Daneshmandi, teacher at Cloverdale Elementary School, and Diane Drilling, student at Hall High School seNed as ex-officio representatives to the Board for the month of April. PROCEDURAL MATTERS/ WELCOMING COMMENTS Mr. Kurrus made brief opening remarks and welcoming comments. He introduced the Booker Arts Magnet School string ensemble directed by Mr. Joe Cripps. REGULAR BOARD MEETING April 25, 2002 Page 2 Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS A. Superintendent's Citations Dr. James introduced the District's seventeen National Merit and National Achievement Scholarship winners. Each of the students present was presented with a plaque in recognition of their achievement. National Merit Finalists: Central High School: Elizabeth Arnold, Melissa Bandy, Jay Bauman, Edward Fleming, Chris Fox-Lent, James Harrell, Toby Huang, Charles Lyford, So/vig Pittenger, Alex Schmidt, Gary Slater, James Szenher, Maxwell Teitle-Paule, Tracy Tran Parkview Magnet High School: Anita Budhraja National Achievement Finalists: Central High School: Frederick McKindra and Justin Mercer The second recognition certificates were presented to Mabelvale Magnet Middle School student, Archie Lester, and the Make-A-Wish Foundation, represented by Renee Burks. Archie was diagnosed with cancer, has been undergoing chemotherapy, and had been out of school since August. The Make-A-Wish Foundation granted his wish to visit Hawaii to see Pearl Harbor. Students and faculty members from Mabelvale have joined together to raise money for the Make-A-Wish foundation and have collected over $600.00 to date. Archie was able to return to school two weeks ago, and his cancer is in remission. Dr. James announced that three LRSD schools were selected to receive minigrants from the Arkansas Space Consortium at UALR. The schools are Washington Magnet School, Mabe/vale Magnet Middle School and Forest Heights Middle School. Representatives from these three schools were present to receive their awards from Camille Johnson, K-12 coordinator of the Arkansas Space Grant Consortium. The Superintendent introduced Michael Peterson, principal of Metropolitan Career and Technical Center. Mr. Peterson, in turn, introduced staff members who presented recognition to Metro students who participated in the Statewide VICA competitions. Seventeen of the 23 students will participate in the national competition for their achievement in various vocational areas. REGULAR BOARD MEETING April 25, 2002 Page 3 Ex officio representatives to the Board were presented with certificates of appreciation for their service during the month of April\nKathy Daneshmandi, teacher at Cloverdale Elementary School, and Diane Drilling, Hall High School student. B. Partners in Education: New Partnerships Prior to the partnership recognition, Debbie Milam announced that the District's volunteer service hours for the year were in excess of $6 million. A mock check was on display here as well as at the annual VIPS celebration, An Evening for the Stars. In addition, Ms. Milam announced a parent involvement planning meeting to be held on Tuesday, April 30 at 6:00 p.m., Parkview Magnet auditorium. Interested parents were invited to attend. Ms. Milam presented certificates in recognition of new business/ school partnerships as noted below. Ms. Magness made a motion to accept the new partnerships, Mr. Rose seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. The new partnerships were: Dunbar Magnet Middle School, represented by Karen Greenlee in partnership with Arkansas Blue Cross and Blue Shield, represented by Kelly Whitehorn Cloverdale Magnet Middle School, represented by Angela Munns, William Broadnax and Najmah Muhammad in partnership with TSF, Inc., represented by Tom Frazier and Julie Craig C. Special Presentation Jane Harkey, principal of Chicot Elementary School, introduced members of the Chicot Family Literacy Program. These Chicot parents and other community members made a brief presentation on the ESL program and achievements and other efforts to reach the Hispanic families in the Chicot area. They presented Board members with copies of a handbook that was developed as part of their English language and computer training. D. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association Frank Martin and Clementine Kelley were present. Mr. Martin addressed the Board, stating that he was hesitant to bring up a matter that would normally be handled in private through the grievance process. He stated information specific to personnel matters involving two District coaches. REGULAR BOARD MEETING April 25, 2002 Page4 These employee's grievances had been heard and decided by an independent arbitrator, and Mr. Martin stated he felt that the District was violating the PN agreement by not following and accepting the arbitrator's ruling. He asked the Board to ensure that the PN agreement be followed to the letter in matters relating to the assignment of these employees for the next school year. E. Joshua lntervenors No report. IV. REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. Remarks from Board Members Ms. Magness congratulated the students at Parkview Magnet School for their outstanding performance in the drama department's production of 'Working.\" She also expressed appreciation to the VI PS staff for their hard work in preparation for the annual Evening for the Stars. Mr. Berkley noted appreciation for all of the VIPS and the hours they contribute to the District. He announced that the Little Rock Public Education Foundation is now incorporated, and he challenged fellow board members to make their donations to the fund. He noted that former board member, Senator John Riggs, had made the first significant donation of $25,000 to the foundation fund. Mr. Rose stated that he had been contacted by some of the developers who are attempting to \"push through\" implementation of TIF districts in Little Rock. He reminded fellow board members to listen with caution as they are approached with the idea that we could benefit from this endeavor. He also made remarks regarding the budget cuts being made by the State of Arkansas, and said that the majority of these fund reductions would fall on the backs of the poorest people in the State. Dr. Mitchell noted that most of the members of the Board and the Superintendent had attended the National School Boards Association annual meeting in New Orleans. She stated that the workshops and staff development sessions made them better Board members, provided motivation for them to do a good job, and gave them an opportunity to bond with each other. REGULAR BOARD MEETING April 25, 2002 Page5 Mr. Kurrus thanked all of the District's volunteers and noted that his wife had received an award at the Evening for the Stars. Commenting on Mr. Rose's remarks earlier referring to the statewide budget cuts for education, Mr. Kurrus noted that the LRSD was \"stepping up\" and would give teachers their raises even though the state has reduced our allocations. B. Desegregation Update Mr. Babbs reported that there was no new information regarding the filing for release from federal court monitoring. He noted that the Joshua intervenors had filed a request for an extension to submit their objections to the release, but the Court has made no decision as yet. C. Budget Update Dr, Stewart reported that another round of budget reductions from the state had been announced, with the projected impact in excess of $600,000. He stated that we might have to tap into reserve funds to finish up this school year in order to balance the budget but, as noted earlier by Mr. Kurrus, salaries will not be impacted at this time. Dr. James stated that additional cuts might occur after June 1.  D. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects Mr. Eaton reported for Mr. Goodman. The bond projects status report was printed in the agenda. E. Internal Auditors Report The Internal Auditors' Report was printed as part of the Board's agenda. Mr. Becker was present, but provided no additional information. E. Technology Update Ms. Neal was present and briefly reviewed the report printed in the Board's agenda. Of significant note was that the wide area network would be complete next week. Eleven sites are up and running on the new phone system, and two will be completed each week until they are finished. REGULAR BOARD MEETING April 25, 2002 Page 6 V. APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS A. Minutes Minutes from the regular meeting of the Board of Directors held on March 21, 2002, and from a special meeting held on April 11, 2002, were presented for review and approval. Mr. Rose made a motion to approve the minutes as presented. Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. VI. INSTRUCTIONAL SERVICES DIVISION A. First Reading: Revised Policy IHBEA- English as a Second Language Policy IHBEA, which provides for educational provisions for students who are identified as limited English proficient was modified as part of an overall review of these services. Newcomer Centers were originally operational in five elementary schools, two middle schools, and one high school. It was found that services could be provided more effectively if the elementary school students were allowed to attend school in their attendance zone or neighborhood school. As a result, elementary assignment to the Newcomers Centers is being phased out, and secondary level ESL students are being provided the option of attending a school with a Newcomer Center or their attendance zone school. The administration's proposal would result in a savings in transportation costs. Mr. Berkley made a motion to approve the revised policy IHBEA on first reading. Ms. Magness seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. B. Social Studies Textbooks/ Materials for Adoption Secondary level social studies textbook review committees presented the recommended textbooks for the 2002-03 school year. Ms. McNeal and Dr. Lesley were present to review the recommendations and copies of the textbooks were provided for the Board's review. Dr. Mitchell made a motion to approve the recommendations. Mr. Rose seconded the motion and it carried 5-0. REGULAR BOARD MEETING April 25, 2002 Page 7 C. Grant Proposal - - Preschool Curriculum Evaluation Research Grant Program The Board was asked to approve the submission of a grant proposal in the amount of $1,132,053 to the U. S. Department of Education Preschool Curriculum Evaluation Research Grant Program. Receipt of these funds will provide for implementation of a rigorous evaluation of preschool curricula that provide information to support early childhood programs. The District will partner with the Waterford Early Reading Program and the Dialogic Reading Preschool program in order to implement the program at ten elementary schools in the LRSD. Local matching funds were not required. Ms. Magness moved to maintain the February submission of this grant. Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. D. Report: Safe Schools / Healthy Students Project Mary Paal, Director of the Safe Schools/ Healthy Students project provided an in-depth review of the second quarterly report and project status. A copy of the report had been previously provided for the Board's review and it was noted that this is the second year of the three-year funding cycle. VII. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIVISION A. First Reading: Health Policies -JE, JLC, JLCA, JLCB, JLCC, JLCD and JLCE A review and revision of the entire policy manual section on health-related issues was presented for the Board's consideration. The administration recommended approval of these policies on first reading. Mr. Berkley made a motion to approve the policies as presented for first reading. Mr. Rose seconded the motion and it carried 5-0. B. Request to Increase School Breakfast and Lunch Prices The Administrative Services Division of Child Nutrition presented a proposal for increasing the price of school meals effective for the 2002-03 school year. The last increase was during the 1998-99 school year, at which time lunch prices were increased, but breakfast prices remained the same as the cost in 1982-83. The proposed increase is in the amount of $.25 per meal at breakfast and lunch. Ms. Magness made a motion to approve the request for a price increase for breakfast and lunch in the 2002-03 school year\nMr. Berkley seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. REGULAR BOARD MEETING April 25, 2002 Page 8 C. Contract Revisions Dr. Hurley presented revisions to the 2000-2003 contracts of security officers, paraprofessionals and custodians. These changes were implemented at the beginning of the contract terms and were presented for formal review and approval of the Board. Dr. Mitchell made a motion to approve the amendments to the contracts for these employee groups. Ms. Magness seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. D. Personnel Changes Personnel items were presented as a part of the Board's agenda and the administration recommended Board approval. Mr. Berkley made a motion to approve the personnel changes as presented. Ms. Magness seconded the motion and it carried 5-0. VIII. BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION A. Resolution Authorizing L~ase of School Buses The Board was asked to approve a resolution authorizing postdated warrants to finance the purchase of twelve used school buses. The payments will run from 2003 to 2009, at an interest rate of 4.5%. Payment will be in seven installments of $65,568.20, with closing costs of $5,020. A majority of the expense will be offset by savings in fuel and maintenance costs and the  amounts received through the sale of old school buses. Dr. Mitchell made a motion to approve the resolution\nMr. Berkley seconded the motion and it . carried unanimously. B. Donations of Property The Board was asked to approve acceptance of recent donations to the District.  Mr. Berkley made a motion to accept the donations, Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. Mr. Berkley read the list of items as noted . in the following chart: DONATIONS SCHOOUDEPARTMENT ITEM DONOR Franklin Elementary School Early Literacy materials valued at Union Pacific Railroad/ Adopt-A- $1,500. Child Project Cash in the amount of $1,038. for Second Baptist Church purchase of school uniforms REGULAR BOARD MEETING April 25, 2002 Page 9 DONATIONS: (continued) SCHOOL/DEPARTMENT Forest Heights Middle School Jefferson Elementary School Mabelvale Middle School Metropolitan Career-Technical Center Mitchell Academy Little Rock School District Desegregation Scholarship Fund ITEM Cash in the amount of $100. to the Athletic Deoartment Three (3) laptop computers, valued at approximately $900 each for use in first grade classrooms Cash in the amount of $220. to the Book Fair for vouchers for needy students An American Flag Five dry erase boards and three chalkboards, estimated at $975.00 Two overhead projectors, two electric pencil sharpeners, an electric hole punch, Sony Handcam vision camcorder with tripod, and miscellaneous office supplies valued at$1 ,000 $2,000 cash to the Accelerated Reader Incentive Program to purchase higher-level books, to fund AR incentive parties, and to purchase rewards for top AR students 100 buddy passes, valued at $400 for the AR end-of-year party and ten free oasses valued at $80.00 Miscellaneous mixing materials and agitator lids, valued at $2,500 for auto bodv reoair shoo Miscellaneous school supplies valued at approximately $100.00 $200 cash to be used to purchase books for the library Miscellaneous school supplies and character education book covers, valued at over $500. 1,000 books collected and donated to the school library $150 cash DONOR Mr. \u0026amp; Mrs. Nolen C. Wilson University of Ar1\u0026lt;ansas Systems Offices University of Ar1\u0026lt;ansas Systems Offices I Dr. Alan B. Sugg UAMS Division of Mental Health Reeves Fasteners and Industrial Supplies Mabelvale Magnet Middle School PTSA Trinity Episcopal Outreach Program Ar1\u0026lt;ansas Skatium Roper Auto Parts Sigma Gamma Rho Sorority, Inc., Theta Sigma Graduate Chapter Jimmy Morris, Omega Psi Phi Fraternity, Inc. , Pi Omicron Chapter Morris Anderson / State Farm Insurance Company Chenal Nelson, Student at Mt. St. Mary's, member of St. Mari\u0026lt; Baptist Church Anonymous REGULAR BOARD MEETING April 25, 2002 Page 10 B. Financial Report Mr. Milhollen was present to review the financial reports printed in the Board's agenda. Mr. Berkley made a motion to approve the reports as submitted. Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. IX. SCHOOL SERVICES DIVISION A. First Reading: Policy KBBA - Custodial and Non-custodial Parent Rights and Responsibilities Policy KBBA, Custodial and Non-custodial Parent Rights and Responsibilities, was drafted to provide guidance to school personnel with regard to access to students and to school records by parents. Mr. Berkley made a motion to approve the policy on first reading. Mr. Rose seconded the motion, and it carried 5-0. B. TAP Update The Board heard a report from Ann Mangan and Sharon Brooks regarding implementation of the TAP Program in their schools. Rockefeller Elementary School will receive $507,450 and Stephens will receive $692,325 for the threeyear implementation period. This initiative, funded by the Walton Family Foundation, stresses accountability and helps to provide higher teacher salaries as a means to improve student achievement. The principals have begun interviewing and selecting master and mentor teachers. X. DISTRICT OPERATIONS A. Easement: City of Little Rock/ Pulaski Heights Elementary B. Quitclaim Deed - Easement: City of Little Rock/ Hall High School C. Dedicated Right of Way I Cloverdale Middle School Mr. Eaton presented requests for easements and right of way requests by the City of Little Rock. The first request provides for an easement at Pulaski Heights Elementary School for the relocation of a sewer line. The second submission requests approval for a deed of approximately 30 feet of frontage property at Hall High School, where a sidewalk will be installed. The third request will authorize the transfer of less than one acre at Cloverdale Middle School to provide street improvements north of the school building. Ms. Magness made a motion to approve the property transfer and easement requests by the City of Little Rock as requested by administration. Dr. Mitchell seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. REGULAR BOARD MEETING April 25, 2002 Page 11 XI. CLOSING REMARKS XII. A. Superintendent's Report: Dr. James briefly reminded Board members of the dates for the high school graduation ceremonies. Fair and Hall High graduations are on May 28, Central High graduation is on May 29, and Parkview and McClellan ceremonies will be on May 30. All of the commencement ceremonies are to be held at Alltel arena. The Board recessed briefly at 8:21 p.m. to clear the Boardroom and prepare for an employee hearing. EMPLOYEE HEARING Roderick Alexander, an instructional aide at McDermott Elementary School, was recommended for termination based on charges of using excessive force in disciplining a student. Dr. Hurley provided information for the Board's review, and noted that although Mr. Alexander requested the hearing, he was not present. The administration asked the Board to uphold the recommended termination. Mr. Berkley made a motion to uphold the superintendent's recommendation of termination based on the allegations submitted in the principal's request for termination. Ms. Magness seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. XIII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Board, Ms. Magness moved to adjourn at 8:43 p.m. Mr. Berkley seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. APPROVED: 5 -.J 3  OJ-H. Baker Kurrus, President Tony Rose,,,Secretary ' LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES SPECIAL BOARD MEETING May 9, 2002 The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held a special meeting on Thursday, May 9, 2002, in the Boardroom of the Administration Building, 810 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. Vice President Judy Magness presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Judy Magness Tony Rose RECEIVED Larry Berkley Mike Daugherty Katherine Mitchell Sue Strickland MEMBERS ABSENT: Baker Kurrus ALSO PRESENT: T. Kenneth James, Superintendent of Schools Beverly Griffin, Recorder of the Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER MAY 2 9 2002 OFACE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING Vice President Judy Magness called the special meeting to order at 5:04 p.m. Five members of the Board were present at roll call\nDr. Mitchell arrived at 5:08 p.m., Mr. Kurrus was absent. Sherry Chambers, teacher exofficio representative from Dodd Elementary School was also present. The student ex-officio representative from McClellan High School did not attend. II. PURPOSE OF THE MEETING The agenda for the special meeting follows: I. Personnel Actions - Central High School Principal II. Report: Urban Land Institute/ Midtown Redevelopment Recommendations SPECIAL BOARD MEETING May 9, 2002 Page2 Ill. ACTION A. Personnel Actions - Central High School Principal Dr. James presented his recommendation to employ Nancy Rousseau as the principal of Central High School. He briefed the Board on the process followed in making his decision, and indicated that all of the candidates were quality individuals. The top three candidates were selected by the screening committee and recommended for the Superintendent's consideration. Ms. Strickland made a motion to approve the Superintendent's recommendation, Mr. Berkley seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. Ms. Rousseau was present and briefly addressed the Board. She expressed her appreciation of their confidence in her abilities to lead the state's largest high school and she committed to working diligently to continue the tradition of excellence and the reputation of Central High School. B. Report: Urban Land Institute / Midtown Redevelopment Recommendations Representatives of the City of Little Rock Planning Commission were present to review recommendations made in a report of the Urban Land Institute, which was commissioned by the City. Present were Craig Berry, Tony Bozynski, and Richard Downing. Board Members were provided with a copy of the ULI Report, which was presented to the City in April 2001. Since that time, the city has been studying the recommendations and gathering data to support the findings of the report. A great deal of emphasis was placed on the redesign of the University Mall area, and the impact this action would have on the mid-town area. Mr. Berry noted that a resolution will be presented to the City Board of Directors on Tuesday, May 21, 2002, and he asked the LRSD Board to support the redevelopment plans. The Superintendent reminded the Board that no official action was anticipated or recommended at this time\nno action item was included on the Board's agenda for this meeting. The report presented tonight was intended solely for the purpose of providing additional information for consideration. '. SPECIAL BOARD MEETING May 9, 2002 Page3 Dr. James thanked the members of the City Planning Commission staff for taking the time to come before the Board and he indicated that if additional information was required, we would contact them at a later time. I~ ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Board, the meeting adjourned at 5:30 p.m. on a motion by Mr. Berkley, seconded by Mr. Rose. APPROVED: 5J.30~ H. Baker Kurrus, President To62tttl!cp LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES REGULAR BOARD MEETING May 23, 2002 The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held its regularly scheduled meeting at 6:00 p.m. on Thursday, May 23, 2002, in the Boardroom of the Administration Building, 81 0 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. President Baker Kurrus presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Baker Kurrus Judy Magness Tony Rose Larry Berkley Micheal Daugherty Katherine Mitchell Sue Strickland MEMBERS ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: RECEIVED JUL 1 - 2002 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING T. Kenneth James, Superintendent of Schools Beverly Griffin, Recorder of Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL President Baker Kurrus called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Six members of the Board were present at roll call\nMs. Strickland arrived at 6:10 p.m. Sherry Chambers, teacher at Dodd Elementary School, served as ex-officio representative to the Board for the month of May. The student representative from McClellan Magnet High School did not attend. REGULAR BOARD MEETING May 23, 2002 Page 2 II. 111. PROCEDURAL MATTERS/ WELCOMING COMMENTS Mr. Kurrus made brief opening remarks and welcoming comments. He asked Mr. Berkley to assist with the citations, recognitions and partnerships. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS A. Superintendent's Citations Dr. James introduced the 2002 Stephens Award winners. Each student received a $5,000 scholarship, and each teacher received $5,000 cash award from the City Education Trust Fund. The students were Jay Bauman and Rachael Seidenschnur from Central High School and Marissa McDaniel from Hall High School. The teacher recipients were Sarah Gadberry, Alison Hargis, and Lenora Murray from Central High School, Martha K. Raines from Fair High School, Jennifer Lusk from Parkview Magnet High School, and Adeal Williams from McClellan High School. Each year the District purchases a work of art from one student at each high school. The pieces are then hung in the administration building for public enjoyment. This year's student winners were present to display their work and receive a check in the amount of $200.00. The students were: Anushree Jumde, Central High School\nChristina Pena, Fair High School\nChris Young, Hall High School\nLatarsha Burns, McClellan High School\nand Trevor Bennett, Parkview Magnet High School. James Henson, Safety \u0026amp; Security officer, and Danielle Dickson, student at Fair High School were recognized for their quick thinking and life-saving actions. J. A. Fair teacher, Martha Nahlen, was eating lunch alone in her classroom in mid-April when she began to choke. She entered the hallway where she got the attention of Ms. Dickson, who ran for assistance. Mr. Henson administered the Heimlich maneuver, and dislodged the food from Ms. Nahlen's throat. They were recognized for saving Ms. Nahlen's life by their swift actions. The Central High School chess team won the state championship this year, with a record 5 wins, 0 losses, and 1 tie. Members of the team were introduced and given superintendent's citations for their achievement. The chess team members are: Joe Liu, Joel Amaro, Victor Harris, and Shannon Rogers. Their sponsor is James Hill. REGULAR BOARD MEETING May 23, 2002 Page 3 Superintendent's citations were also presented to the Central High School men's tennis team, who won the state championship for the third consecutive year.- Team members are: Matthew Angulo, Mark Bacon, Scott Bacon, Hunter Benson, Nick Clifford, Andrew Crone, Alex DePriest, Brock Dial, Blake Downing, Daniel Krupitsky, Kevin Luneau, David Mitchell, Ananth Ranganathan, John Shults, and Peter Thomas. The Central High School women's soccer team won the state 5A championship, defeating the four-time state champions of Fayetteville in recent tournament play. Team members are: Anne-Claire Allen, Caroline Allen, Melissa Bandy, Katy Benson, Lindsey Brown, Lauren Cloud, Camille Cook, Allison Corbin, Sally Cunningham, Elizabeth Daters, Riley Duke, Sheffield Duke, Jessica East, Elizabeth Gray, Cara Janton, Elizabeth Manney, Elise Norton, Stephanie Rogers, Lindsey Short, Rebecca Vehik, and Claire Wetzel. Their sponsors are: Betsy Hall-Jones and Ellen Teeter, and the coaches are Keith McPherson and David Duke. Jennie Cooper heads the men's and women's soccer program at Central High School. The teacher ex officio representative, Sherry Chambers, from Dodd Elementary School, was presented with a certificate of appreciation for her service during the month of May. The student representative, from McClellan High School, did not attend. B. Partners in Education: New Partnerships Debbie Milam presented certificates in recognition of new business/ school partnerships as noted below. Mr. Berkley made a motion to accept the new partnerships, Ms. Magness seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. The new partnerships were: Fair Park Elementary School, represented by Principal Samuel Branch, in partnership with Center for Effective Parenting, represented by Dr. Nicholas Long Geyer Springs Elementary School, represented by Principal Donna Hall in partnership with Arkansas Children's Hospital - Insure the Children, represented by Debbie Rushing REGULAR BOARD MEETING May 23, 2002 Page 4 IV. C. Remarks from Citizens Sheffie Akbar, addressed the Board regarding the elimination of an art specialist position at Booker Arts Magnet School. She stated that many parents selected Booker for the arts curriculum, and that eliminating this position, or removing the teacher who is in that position, will \"water down\" the program. She noted that many parents have signed petitions in support of keeping this position. D. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association Clementine Kelley was present, but indicated that she had no report. E. Joshua lntervenors No report. REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS A. Remarks from Board Members Dr. Mitchell commented on the elections held earlier in the week, and expressed her disappointment that Senator John Riggs was not reelected. She stated that Mr. Riggs has a good record on issues affecting the children of Little Rock, as well as on education efforts across the state. She noted that his dedication and service to the \"education cause\" started during his terms on the LRSD Board. Dr. Daugherty echoed Dr. Mitchell's comments and stated that he was very disappointed that Mr. Riggs lost the election, and even more disappointed that race was brought into the election as an issue by his opponent. On another note, Dr. Daugherty expressed support for the LR Chief of Police and disappointment in the FOP for their public stand against Chief Johnson. Mr. Berkley also commented on Mr. Riggs' election loss, but expressed confidence that Mr. Riggs is not finished with his support of children and educational issues. Ms. Magness expressed appreciation to fellow members of the Board for making comments that invalidate race as an issue. REGULAR BOARD MEETING May 23, 2002 Page 5 Ms. Strickland expressed disappointment in the results of this week's election. She stated that she was \"shocked\" that Mr. Riggs did not win. In addition, she reported that she installed the Parkview PTSA officers for next year. She was impressed that students take an active role in the PTSA process at Parkview and she encouraged other schools to do the same. Mr. Kurrus expressed his high regard for Mr. Riggs, and said that he was proud of all Mr. Riggs has done for the children in Little Rock and Arkansas. He stated confidence that Mr. Riggs will continue to work for education in the future and he expressed hope that the people who were elected will \"step up to the plate\" to do what is right for public education. Mr. Rose remembered his first contact with Mr. Riggs was through the Chicot Elementary School PTA when Mr. Riggs donated his excess campaign funds to various LRSD PTA units. He noted his respect for Mr. Riggs and also expressed confidence he would continue to work to benefit children and education. Mr. Rose announced that he had attended the annual SECME awards banquet at UALR. He thanked the staffs of the LRSD and UALR who work tirelessly to encourage minority students to excel and achieve in math and science. B. Desegregation Update Mr. Babbs reported that the District's compliance committee continues to meet weekly to prepare for court hearings that have been scheduled for the week of July 22. Evidence will be presented as to compliance in the areas of student discipline, achievement, program evaluation, guidance and counseling, AP/Honors courses, and extracurricular activities. Judge Wilson has set aside 5 days for this hearing in response to our efforts to be declared unitary. He reported that other student registration processes are on schedule in preparation for the 2002-2003 school year. C. Budget Update Dr. Stewart reported that the business office staff was in the process of preparing summer payroll checks. In addition, all budget managers have submitted their annual budget requests and this information is being loaded into the system. REGULAR BOARD MEETING May 23, 2002 Page 6 D. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects Mr. Goodman reported that a lot of the scheduled construction projects would begin over the summer months and that construction has begun at Romine Elementary. All asbestos projects should be complete by the end of the summer. The updated progress report was printed in the Board's agenda. E. Internal Auditors Report The Internal Auditors' Report was printed as part of the Board's agenda. Mr. Becker was present, but provided no additional information. F. Technology Update Ms. Neal was present and briefly reviewed the report printed in the Board's agenda. V. APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS A. Minutes Minutes from the regular meeting of the Board of Directors held on April 25, 2002, and from a special meeting held on May 9, 2002, were presented for review and approval. Mr. Rose made a motion to approve the minutes as presented. Ms. Magness seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. VI. INSTRUCTIONAL SERVICES DIVISION A. Second Reading: Revised Policy IHBEA - English as a Second Language B. First Reading: Revisions to Instructional Policies - - IKACA - Parental Visits and Conferences IKC - Class Rankings/ Grade-Point Averages, with Regulations IKEC - Award of Credit, with Regulations IKF - General Education Graduation Requirements Policy IHBEA provides for educational provisions for students who are identified as limited English proficient and was modified as part of an overall review of these services. As a result of these modifications, elementary assignment to the Newcomers Centers is being phased out, and secondary level ESL students are being provided the option of attending a school with a REGULAR BOARD MEETING May 23, 2002 Page 7 Newcomer Center or their attendance zone school. The proposal will result in a savings in transportation costs. The revised policy was approved on first readlng at the April meeting of the Board and was presented for second reading approval. In addition, first reading approval was requested for instructional policies, IKACA, IKC, IKEC, and IKF. Changes to these policies were proposed in order to bring our policies into compliance with state accreditation standards, and many of the changes incorporate language directly from these standards. Ms. Magness made a motion to approve the revised policy IHBEA on second reading and all of the instructional policies submitted for first reading approval. Dr. Daugherty seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. C. Regulation IHCDA-R - Concurrent Enrollment The ADE standards review team recommended revisions to District regulation IHCDA-R, regulating concurrent enrollment. The revision will allow all eligible high school students to participate in the option of dual enrollment. The Board was not required to take action, but was invited to comment or question the recommended changes. D. Report: Jobs for Arkansas' Graduates (JAG) Carol Green provided a brief report for inclusion in the Board's agenda regarding the JOBS for Arkansas' Graduates (JAG) program. This initiative is being implemented at Central, Fair, Hall and McClellan High Schools beginning in the 2002-03 school year. Teresa Dow from the Arkansas Department of Workforce Education attended the agenda meeting with Ms. Green to discuss the mission of the program and answer questions from the Board. The program targets students who are at risk of dropping out of school, and trains these students in employability skills and career development. VII. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIVISION A. Second Reading: Health Policies -JE, JLC, JLCA, JLCB, JLCC, JLCD and JLCE A review and revision of the policy manual on health-related issues was presented for the Board's second reading approval. First reading approval was granted at the April meeting of the Board. Mr. Berkley moved to approve the policies as presented for second reading. Ms. Magness seconded the motion and itcarried unanimously. REGULAR BOARD MEETING May 23, 2002 Page 8 B. Revisions to Student Handbook, 2002-03 Dr. Watson presented proposed revisions to the Student handbook for Elementary, Middle, and Senior High School students. Johnnie Johnson was present to review and discuss the policies relating to extracurricular, cocurricular and athletic activities. Dr. Watson noted that the handbooks would be available on the District's website for the next school year. Dr. Mitchell made a motion to approve the revisions and changes to the handbook\nMr. Berkley seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. The Board took a brief recess and returned at 7:20 p.m. C. Personnel Changes Personnel items were presented as a part of the Board's agenda. In addition, the nomination of Ms. Eunice Thrasher for the position of principal at Rightsell Elementary School was presented for the Board's approval. Ms. Thrasher was present and thanked the Board for giving her the opportunity to serve as the instructional leader at Rightsell. Dr. Mitchell moved to approve the appointment of Eunice Thrasher as the principal of Rightsell Elementary School. Dr. Daugherty seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. ' On the remainder of the personnel items, Dr. Daugherty made a motion to approve the changes as presented in the agenda. Mr. Rose seconded the motion and it carried 7- 0. VIII. BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION A. Donations of Property The Board was asked to approve acceptance of recent donations to the District. Mr. Kurrus read the listed donations. Ms. Magness made a motion to accept the donations, Dr. Daugherty seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. Donations are listed in the following chart: DONATIONS SCHOOUDEPARTMENT ITEM DONOR Fulbright Elementary School $500.00 cash to be applied toward the Schickel's Cleaners purchase of new playground equipment Dry cleaning coupons in the amount of $200.00 for the Silent Auction REGULAR BOARD MEETING May 23, 2002 Page 9 DONATIONS: (continued) SCHOOUDEPARTMENT ITEM DONOR Geyer Springs Elementary School $2,500.00 challenge grant toward the City of Little Rock with Geyer purchase of a new school sign Springs Neighborhood Association $100.00 cash toward the purchase of Theresa Lane a new school sian Jefferson Elementary School Refreshments and lunch, valued at Harvest Foods Store #6168 approximately $100.00 for Special Olympics Team Play fort, valued at approximately Bob \u0026amp; Debbie Worthington $1,000.00 for the pre-K playground Accelerated Reader test disk valued at Jefferson SECME Club $139.00 Pulaski Heights Elementary School A combo punch and bind machine, Mr. \u0026amp; Mrs. William Griffin valued at $427.00 to the kindergarten staff Williams Magnet School Paintings, valued at $400.00 to the art Richard DeSpain and Betty Wright department $11,000 ca.sh to be used to purchase Williams Magnet School PTA a new school sign, _instructional materials, resource materials and special programs for teachers, student awards, certificates and incentives LRSD HIPPY Offir,e Computer desk with hutch valued at Arkansas HIPPY Office aooroximatelv $300.00 LRSD Assorted office furniture, valued at Air Transport International $4,670.00, for use where needed LRSD Professional Development Dept. Books, valued at approximately Cynthia Howell/ Arkansas $3,500.00 to the Mahlon Martin Democrat - Gazette Professional Develooment Librarv B. Financial Report Mr. Milhollen was present to review the financial reports printed in the Board's agenda. He noted that the county collector's office has done a good job of collecting delinquent taxes, therefore revenue from that source is being  received in a more timely manner than in previous years. He noted that the report included in the agenda is for 10 months of the fiscal year and that endof- year budget preparation activities are in progress. June 30 ends the current year, and the final 2001-02 budget report will be presented as soon as it is complete. Ms. Magness made a motion to approve the reports as submitted. Mr. Berkley seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. REGULAR BOARD MEETING May 23, 2002 Page 10 IX. SCHOOL SERVICES DIVISION A. Second Reading: Policy KBBA - Custodial and Non-custodial Parent Rights and Responsibilities Policy KBBA, Custodial and Non-custodial Parent Rights and Responsibilities, was drafted to provide guidance to school personnel with regard to access to students and to school records by parents. It was given first reading approval at the April Board meeting. Dr. Mitchell made a motion to approve the policy on second reading. Ms. Strickland seconded the motion, and it carried 7-0. X. DISTRICT OPERATIONS No report or action presented. XI. CLOSING REMARKS - A. Superintendent's Report: Dr. James reminded Board members of the upcoming graduation dates. He also noted that the June meeting of the Board had been rescheduled from Thursday, June 27 to Tuesday, June 25. He noted that he had spoken to the HIPPY students at their graduation ceremony and at the commencement program for the ACC. XII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Board, Ms. Magness moved to adjourn at 7:35 p.m. Mr. Rose seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. APPROVED: i J5-01 H. Baker Kurrus, President ~z:xtf!ILR LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MINUTES SPECIAL BOARD MEETING June 6, 2002 The Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District held a special meeting on Thursday, June 6, 2002, in the Boardroom of the Administration Building, 810 West Markham Street, Little Rock, Arkansas. President Baker Kurrus presided. MEMBERS PRESENT: Baker Kurrus Judy Magness Tony Rose Larry Berkley Mike Daugherty Katherine Mitchell Sue Strickland MEMBERS ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: RECEIVED JUL 1 - 2002 OFACEOF DESEGREGATION MONITORING T. Kenneth James, Superintendent of Schools Beverly Griffin, Recorder of the Minutes I. CALL TO ORDER ' . President Baker Kurrus called the special meeting to order at 5:07 p.m. Five members of the Board were present at roll call\nDr. Mitchell arrived at 5: 12 p.m. and Dr. Daugherty arrived at 5: 15 p.m. II. PURPOSE OF THE MEETING The agenda for the special meeting follows: I. Personnel Actions - Principal Assignments 11. Employee Hearings SPECIAL BOARD MEETING June 6, 2002 Page2 Ill. ACTION A. Personnel Actions - Principal Assignments Dr. James reported that he had met with the Campus Leadership Teams at Pulaski Heights Middle School and McClellan High School regarding the recommended appointment of the new principals at those school sites. Dr. Daniel Whitehorn was recommended for appointment to the position of principal at Pulaski Heights Middle School and Mr. Larry Buck was recommended to the McClellan High School position. Mr. Berkley made a motion to approve the Superintendent's recommendations\nMs. Magness seconded the motion and it carried unanimously, 5-0. After the vote, and after Dr. Whitehorn and Mr. Buck spoke briefly, Dr. Mitchell arrived. Mr. Berkley made a motion to suspend the rules to allow a second vote on the assignment of principals at PHMS and McClellan, so that Dr. Mitchell would have the opportunity to vote. Ms. Magness seconded the motion to suspend the rules and it carried unanimously. Mr. Kurrus restated Mr. Berkley's original motion\nit was seconded by Ms. Magness and carried 6-0. B. Employee Hearings Ms. Magness made a motion to go into executive session for the purpose of conducting employee hearings. Ms. Strickland seconded the motion and it carried 6-0. Dr. Hurley distributed a packet of information regarding the recommended termination of Ms. Laverne Ervin. Ms. Ervin was an instructional aide at Rockefeller Elementary School. The documentation provided included copies of letters of warning for inappropriate behavior, progressive discipline records, and memorandums regarding other performance-based issues. The superintendent acted on the principals' recommendation for termination on March 15, 2002. In April, Ms. Ervin filed a grievance, and a grievance hearing was held in April. The hearing officer found that Ms. Ervin's termination was for valid reasons, and she filed an appeal, requesting a hearing before the LRSD Board of Directors. SPECIAL BOARD MEETING June 6, 2002 Page3 Frank Martin represented Ms. Ervin in the hearing and asked the Board to consider the testimony of the witnesses only as a basis for the facts given in the Superintendent's letter of termination. He stated that Ms. Ervin had never challenged any of the previous suspensions or disciplinary sanctions, and he asked that she be given a probationary period in which to correct her behaviors and retain her employment with the District. The school principal, Anne Mangan, and other Rockefeller Early Childhood employees were called as witnesses to the behaviors and incidents which led to the recommendation for termination. Those witnesses were: Ann Fileatreau, Martha Roberts, and Vicki Burks. Ms. Ervin testified that she disagreed with the reasons for dismissal and she denied any misconduct. When questioned by Board members, she stated she did not know why the witnesses would have presented testimony against her. The Board took a brief recess to deliberate at 6:40 p.m. They returned at 7:05 p.m. and reported that no action had been taken during recess. Ms. Magness made a motion to uphold the superintendent's recommendation for termination based on the first item noted in his letter - - that Ms. Ervin \"failed to perform basic elements of her job.\" Ms. Strickland seconded the motion, and it carried 7-0. The second hearing was for Velrita Campbell. Dr. Hurley provided summary documents for the Board's review. Ms. Campbell was a security officer at Parkview Magnet High School for over seven years. The Superintendent's termination letter, dated May 3, 2002, stated the reason for the termination recommendation was that she knowingly requested payment for overtime on occasions when she did not work. Frank Martin, in his opening statement to the Board, stipulated agreement that Ms. Campbell signed overtime sheets for events that she did not work. He stated that proof with regard to which events she did or did not work were not an issue for her, but that the issue was whether there was intent to falsify the timesheets. Her contention was that past practices allowed security officers to claim a minimum of three hours of pay for events even if events were cancelled. Dr. Hurley called witnesses to testify that Ms. Campbell was not present for events that she listed on her overtime pay sheet. Witnesses included Judy Goss, Ernie McGee, Debbie Howell, Pat Treadway, Linda Brown, and Ricky Newth. Events included drama department productions, debate tournaments, athletic events, musical and dance department productions, and SAT testing. SPECIAL BOARD MEETING June 6, 2002 Page4 Bobby Jones, Director of Safety \u0026amp; Security, reported that he interviewed over twenty people in the investigation of falsification of timesheets in the security division. He noted that security officers were sometimes paid for events if they were cancelled after the security officer arrived on duty. If events were cancelled in advance of the scheduled start time, the officers were not paid to merely show up. He also noted that it is up to the individual school's administration to make sure that their security staff is appropriately scheduled and notified in the case of cancellations. Dexter Booth, assistant principal, was the administrator responsible for signing timesheets for security officers at the time this issue came to be known. He stated that he signed the timesheets, but that he did not have personal knowledge when security officers worked. He considered the security officers to be on \"the honor system\" and he assumed they only turned in time for when they were actually on duty. He no longer has the responsibility for scheduling and assigning security staff, and he no longer signs the time sheets. Alvin Turner, a retired security officer, testified on behalf of Ms. Campbell. He stated that he had also worked some of the events Ms. Campbell claimed to have worked, and that oftentimes they were on the school parking lot as security officers, even if no one saw him there. He supported her statements that they often worked the parking area together, and oftentimes did not enter the building, sign in, or check with other members of the staff. Floyd Smith, Central High School security officer, testified that they had been given permission by Bennie McDonald, at a security officer's inservice session, to claim three hours when events were cancelled. This was to insure that sufficient security staff was present\nthat it was difficult to get enough people to staff an event if they were only getting paid for one or two hours. Frank Martin asked the Board to consider a suspension of Ms. Campbell, even a suspension without pay, until such time as the District can adopt and implement policies and procedures to govern the practice of security officer overtime pay. He stated that Ms. Campbell had been a long-time employee and that the disciplinary action should fall short of termination. Ms. Magness made a motion to uphold the administration's recommendation for termination for knowingly requesting overtime pay for time not worked. Mr. Rose seconded the motion, and it carried 6-1, with Dr. Daugherty casting the \"no\" vote. SPECIAL BOARD MEETING June 6, 2002 Page5 IV. Gina Norman, a security officer at Hall High School, requested a hearing before the Bo\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eLittle Rock School District\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"loc_rosaparks_49319","title":"54, Montgomery bus service [graphic].","collection_id":"loc_rosaparks","collection_title":"Rosa Parks Papers","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Ohio, Hamilton County, Cincinnati, 39.12711, -84.51439"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2002"],"dcterms_description":["Title from item.","Drawing sent to Rosa Parks by students at St. James School, Cincinnati, Ohio. Signed: Michelle M. \u0026 Liz Bertsch ."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":null,"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["Children's art"],"dcterms_title":["54, Montgomery bus service [graphic]."],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Library of Congress"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.49318","http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.49319"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Please contact holding institution for information regarding use and copyright status."],"dcterms_medium":["drawingscolor2000-2010.gmgpc","children's art2000-2010.gmgpc","greeting cards2000-2010.gmgpc"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"loc_rosaparks_47902","title":"[Activist Johnnie Carr (center), actress Angela Bassett and others celebrating the premier of the film \"The Rosa Parks Story,\" Detroit Institute of Arts] [graphic] /","collection_id":"loc_rosaparks","collection_title":"Rosa Parks Papers","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Michigan, Wayne County, Detroit, 42.33143, -83.04575"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2002"],"dcterms_description":["Title devised by Library staff.","\"Photos by Jonas Urbonas 1418 W. Elmwood Ave. Clawson, MI 48017\"--stamped on back."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":null,"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":null,"dcterms_title":["[Activist Johnnie Carr (center), actress Angela Bassett and others celebrating the premier of the film \"The Rosa Parks Story,\" Detroit Institute of Arts] [graphic] /"],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Library of Congress"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.47902"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Please contact holding institution for information regarding use and copyright status."],"dcterms_medium":["photographic printscolor2000-2010.gmgpc"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","Bassett, Angela","Carr, Johnnie Rebecca, 1911-2008"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"loc_rosaparks_47908","title":"[Activist Johnnie Carr with friends of Rosa Parks celebrating the premier of the film \"The Rosa Parks Story\" and Parks' 89th birthday, Detroit Institute of Arts] [graphic] /","collection_id":"loc_rosaparks","collection_title":"Rosa Parks Papers","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Michigan, Wayne County, Detroit, 42.33143, -83.04575"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2002"],"dcterms_description":["Title devised by Library staff.","\"Photos by Jonas Urbonas 1418 W. Elmwood Ave. Clawson, MI 48017\"--stamped on back."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":null,"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":null,"dcterms_title":["[Activist Johnnie Carr with friends of Rosa Parks celebrating the premier of the film \"The Rosa Parks Story\" and Parks' 89th birthday, Detroit Institute of Arts] [graphic] /"],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Library of Congress"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.47908"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Please contact holding institution for information regarding use and copyright status."],"dcterms_medium":["photographic printscolor2000-2010.gmgpc"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","Carr, Johnnie Rebecca, 1911-2008"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"loc_rosaparks_47916","title":"[Actress Angela Bassett, actor Courtney B. Vance and others celebrating the premier of the film \"The Rosa Parks Story\" and Parks' 89th birthday, Detroit Institute of Arts] [graphic] /","collection_id":"loc_rosaparks","collection_title":"Rosa Parks Papers","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Michigan, Wayne County, Detroit, 42.33143, -83.04575"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2002"],"dcterms_description":["Title devised by Library staff.","\"Photos by Jonas Urbonas 1418 W. Elmwood Ave. Clawson, MI 48017\"--stamped on back."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":null,"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":null,"dcterms_title":["[Actress Angela Bassett, actor Courtney B. Vance and others celebrating the premier of the film \"The Rosa Parks Story\" and Parks' 89th birthday, Detroit Institute of Arts] [graphic] /"],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Library of Congress"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.47916"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Please contact holding institution for information regarding use and copyright status."],"dcterms_medium":["photographic printscolor2000-2010.gmgpc"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","Bassett, Angela","Vance, Courtney B."],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"loc_rosaparks_47918","title":"[Actress Angela Bassett with Fred Burton and an unidentified man celebrating the premier of the film \"The Rosa Parks Story\" and Parks' 89th birthday, Detroit Institute of Arts] [graphic] /","collection_id":"loc_rosaparks","collection_title":"Rosa Parks Papers","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Michigan, Wayne County, Detroit, 42.33143, -83.04575"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2002"],"dcterms_description":["Title devised by Library staff.","\"Photos by Jonas Urbonas 1418 W. Elmwood Ave. Clawson, MI 48017\"--stamped on back."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":null,"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":null,"dcterms_title":["[Actress Angela Bassett with Fred Burton and an unidentified man celebrating the premier of the film \"The Rosa Parks Story\" and Parks' 89th birthday, Detroit Institute of Arts] [graphic] /"],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Library of Congress"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.47918"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Please contact holding institution for information regarding use and copyright status."],"dcterms_medium":["photographic printscolor2000-2010.gmgpc"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","Bassett, Angela"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"loc_rosaparks_47914","title":"[Actress Angela Bassett with friends of Rosa Parks celebrating the premier of the film \"The Rosa Parks Story\" and Parks' 89th birthday, Detroit Institute of Arts] [graphic] /","collection_id":"loc_rosaparks","collection_title":"Rosa Parks Papers","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Michigan, Wayne County, Detroit, 42.33143, -83.04575"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2002"],"dcterms_description":["Title devised by Library staff.","\"Photos by Jonas Urbonas 1418 W. Elmwood Ave. Clawson, MI 48017\"--stamped on back."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":null,"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":null,"dcterms_title":["[Actress Angela Bassett with friends of Rosa Parks celebrating the premier of the film \"The Rosa Parks Story\" and Parks' 89th birthday, Detroit Institute of Arts] [graphic] /"],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Library of Congress"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.47914"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Please contact holding institution for information regarding use and copyright status."],"dcterms_medium":["photographic printscolor2000-2010.gmgpc"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","Bassett, Angela"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"loc_rosaparks_47920","title":"[Actress Angela Bassett  with Pathway student ushers celebrating the premier of the film \"The Rosa Parks Story\" and Parks' 89th birthday, Detroit Institute of Arts] [graphic] /","collection_id":"loc_rosaparks","collection_title":"Rosa Parks Papers","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Michigan, Wayne County, Detroit, 42.33143, -83.04575"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2002"],"dcterms_description":["Title devised by Library staff.","\"Photos by Jonas Urbonas 1418 W. Elmwood Ave. Clawson, MI 48017\"--stamped on back."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":null,"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":null,"dcterms_title":["[Actress Angela Bassett  with Pathway student ushers celebrating the premier of the film \"The Rosa Parks Story\" and Parks' 89th birthday, Detroit Institute of Arts] [graphic] /"],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Library of Congress"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.47920"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Please contact holding institution for information regarding use and copyright status."],"dcterms_medium":["photographic printscolor2000-2010.gmgpc"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"loc_rosaparks_47910","title":"[Actresses Cicely Tyson and Angela Bassett with others celebrating the premier of the film \"The Rosa Parks Story\" and Parks' 89th birthday, Detroit Institute of Arts] [graphic] /","collection_id":"loc_rosaparks","collection_title":"Rosa Parks Papers","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Michigan, Wayne County, Detroit, 42.33143, -83.04575"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2002"],"dcterms_description":["Title devised by Library staff.","\"Photos by Jonas Urbonas 1418 W. Elmwood Ave. Clawson, MI 48017\"--stamped on back."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":null,"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":null,"dcterms_title":["[Actresses Cicely Tyson and Angela Bassett with others celebrating the premier of the film \"The Rosa Parks Story\" and Parks' 89th birthday, Detroit Institute of Arts] [graphic] /"],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Library of Congress"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.47910"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Please contact holding institution for information regarding use and copyright status."],"dcterms_medium":["photographic printscolor2000-2010.gmgpc"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","Tyson, Cicely","Bassett, Angela"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"loc_rosaparks_47909","title":"[Actresses Cicely Tyson and Angela Bassett with others celebrating the premier of the film \"The Rosa Parks Story\" and Parks' 89th birthday, Detroit Institute of Arts] [graphic] /","collection_id":"loc_rosaparks","collection_title":"Rosa Parks Papers","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Michigan, Wayne County, Detroit, 42.33143, -83.04575"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2002"],"dcterms_description":["Title devised by Library staff.","\"Photos by Jonas Urbonas 1418 W. Elmwood Ave. Clawson, MI 48017\"--stamped on back."],"dc_format":["image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":null,"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":null,"dcterms_title":["[Actresses Cicely Tyson and Angela Bassett with others celebrating the premier of the film \"The Rosa Parks Story\" and Parks' 89th birthday, Detroit Institute of Arts] [graphic] /"],"dcterms_type":["StillImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Library of Congress"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.47909"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Please contact holding institution for information regarding use and copyright status."],"dcterms_medium":["photographic printscolor2000-2010.gmgpc"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":["Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","Tyson, Cicely","Bassett, Angela"],"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_20","title":"Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2002-01","2002-02","2002-03"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Little Rock (Ark.). Office of Desegregation Monitoring","School integration--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Project managers--Implements"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/20"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nLittle Rock School District, plaintiff vs. Pulaski County Special School District, defendant.\nIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL RECEIVED JAN 3 0 2002 OFRCEOF DESEGREGATION MONITORING PLAINTIFFS DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADESPROJECTMANAGEMENTTOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. - IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 ~:=:r=~~~=~~:~======~t.~~~::.:~:cil~t~ B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Mark A. Hagemeier, certify that on January 29, 2002, I caused a copy of the foregoing document t~ be served by U.S. mail, postage prepaid, on the followingperson(s) at the address(es) indicated: M. SamuelJones,ll Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 2000 NationsBank Bldg. 200 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Richard Roachell P.O. Box 17388 Little Rock, AR 72222-7388 RECEIVED JAN 3 O 2002 OFFICEOF DESEGREGATION MONITOIDNS Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 2000 Regions Center 400 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Ann Marshall One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 r CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Mark A Hagemeier, certify that on January 29, 2002, I caused a copy of the foregoing document to be served by U.S. mail, postage prepaid, on the following person(s) at the address(es) indicated: M. SamuelJones,ill Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 2000 NationsBank Bldg. 200 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1 723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Richard Roachell P.O. Box 17388 Little Rock, AR 72222-7388 RECEIVED JAN 3 0 2002 OFACEOF DESEGREGATION MOHITORJNG Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 2000 Regions Center 400 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 3400 TCBY Tower 425 W. Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Ann Marshal 1 One Union National Plaza I 24 West Capitol, Suite I 895 Little Rock, AR 72201 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL RECEIVED JAN 3 0 2002 OfFICEOF DESEGREGATION MONITORJNG PLAINTIFFS DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KA THERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. - IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 Based on the information available .at December 31 . 2001 , tlle ADE calculated the Equalization Funding for FY 01102, subject to periodic adjustments. 8. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 a~ , .. :i'.~1:ti!RrmijtH?:i'.t1~v,~11~fi!~\\1~~:P~~~m:t~er:':fti200:1!ttitiAoE::caicuia1~d for..FY:-..\n,.X@U'.:S4.bje~fl~tp~i\ni.\u0026lt;\u0026gt;di~ '.~jjjru~trr.i$.ht~i C. Process and distribute State MFPA. 1 . Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 6iit\u0026gt;~~t-\n~11~'~]JQ'.ii\n~~t~byti8~~'9f\u0026amp;tate Eq~~tti~tion Fundihg for FY 01102 were:ijiJol~s: i.J~,$:t.tH:i$~4\n447i:1:01..._ NtRsttr $13\n045[9.5.o. Pcssot\\i$2s.zoi3~21-2 Ttnf:'~i1.fmei\\is .. of\nt?te.,.EqliciliiiltjPJl' :fun.ding H:alcufated io.f F.Y' 01/di\\a.t De~o,~~h~1.i?9Q:1{su6i~ct tci p~pdic adfustments/ were as foiJows: LRSQ { $.5~~ 189\n357 NLR$.fi\n}~28,093,00.8. PC$SP:2.i$.4,208,571: D. Determine the number of Magnet students residing in each District and attending a Magnet School. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 Based o.n the information_available\nthe ADE caicuJated at December 31, 2001 for FY 01/02, subject tp_.peri.odic adjstrnents. E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as ordered by the Court. 2 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 Based on the information availa.ble, tile ADE calculated at December 31, 2001 for FY 01/02, subject ~Q periodic adjustments .. It should be noted that currently the Magnet Review Committee is reporting this information instead of the staff attorney as indicated in the Implementation Plan. F. Calculate state aid due the LRSD based upon the Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 Based.on the information available, the ADE calculated at December 31 , 2001 for FY 01 /02, subject to periodic _adjustments. G. Process and distribute state aid for Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 Distributions for FY 01/02 at December 31 , 2001 , totaled $5,067,913. Allotment calculated for FY 01/02 was $11 ,207,576 subject to periodic adjustments. H. Calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school district is entitled. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 Calculated for FY 01/02, subject to periodic adjustments. I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, September - June. 3 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 Distributions for FY 01/02 at December 31, 2001 were: LRso ~ $1,s1 s,624 NLRSD - $780,324 PCSSD - $3,226,072  ?a  The allotments calculated for FY 01 /02 at December 31, 2001, subject to periodic adjustments, were: LRSD - $3,789,060 NLRSD- $1,950,805 PC$SD- $8,065,184 J. Districts submit an estimated Magnet and M-to-M transportation budget to ADE. 1. Projected Ending Date 2. Ongoing, December of each year. Actual as of January 31, 2002 In September 2001 , the Magnet and M-to-M transportation budgets for FY 01/02 were submitted to the ADE by the Districts. K. The Coordinator of School Transportation notifies General Finance to pay districts for the Districts' proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 In September 2001 , General Finance was notified to pay the last one-third payment for FY 00/01 to the Districts. It should be noted that the Transportation Coordinator is currently performing this function instead of Reginald Wilson as indicated in the Implementation Plan. L. ADE pays districts three equal installments of their proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 4 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) L. ADE pays districts three equal installments of their proposed budget. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 In November 2001 , General Finance made the first one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 01/02 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At December 31 , 2001, the following had been paid for FY 01/02: LRSD- $1,156,097.00 NLRSD- $211 ,666.67 PCSSD - $472,132.08 M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 In August 1997, the ADE transportation coordinator reviewed each district's Magnet and M-to-M transportation costs for FY 96/97. In July 1998, each district was asked to submit an estimated budget for the 98/99 school year. In September 1998, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 98/99 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. School districts should receive payment by October 1, 1998 In July 1999, each district submitted an estimated budget for the 99/00 school year. In September 1999, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 99/00 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2000, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 00/01 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2001 , paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 01/02 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. 5 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as stated in Exhibit A of the Implementation Plan. 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 In FY 94/95, the State purchased 52 buses at a cost of $1 ,799,431 which were added to or replaced existing Magnet and M-to-M buses in the Districts. The buses were distributed to the Districts as follows: LRSD - 32\nNLRSD - 6\nand PCSSD - 14. The ADE purchased 64 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $2,334,800 in FY 95/96. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 45\nNLRSD - 7\nand PCSSD - 12. In May 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $646,400. In July 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $624,879. In July 1998, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $695,235. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD- 6. Specifications for 16 school buses have been forwarded to state purchasing for bidding in January, 1999 for delivery in July, 1999. The ADE accepted a bid on 16 buses for the Magnet and M/M transportation program. The buses will be delivered after July 1, 1999 and before August 1, 1999. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nPCSSD- 6. In July 1999, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $718,355. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD- 6. In July 2000, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $724,165. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD - 6. 6 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 The bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was let by State Purchasing on February 22, 2001 . The contract was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include two type C 47 passenger buses and fourteen type C 65 passenger buses. Prices on these units are $43,426.00 each on the 47 passenger buses, and $44,289.00 each on the 65 passenger buses. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 2 of the 47 passenger and 4 of the 65 passenger buses. On August 2, 2001 , the ADE took possession of 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $706,898. 0 . Process and distribute compensatory education payments to LRSD as required by page 23 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 and January 1, of each school year through January 1, 1999. 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 Obligation fulfilled in FY 96/97. P. Process and distribute additional payments in lieu of formula to LRSD as required by page 24 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. 7 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) Q. Process and distribute payments to PCSSD as required by Page 28 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1994. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 Final payment was distributed July 1994. R. Upon loan request by LRSD accompanied by a promissory note, the ADE makes loans to LRSD. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing through July 1, 1999. See Settlement Agreement page 24. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 The LRSD received $3,000,000 on September 10, 1998. As of this reporting date, the LRSD has received $20,000,000 in loan proceeds. S. Process and distribute payments in lieu of formula to PCSSD required by page 29 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. T. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to NLRSD as required by page 31 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 of each school year through June 30, 1996. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. 8 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) U. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 00/01 . Distribution in August2001 for FY 01/02 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 01/02. V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. 1. Projected Ending Date Not applicable. 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 97 /98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 00/01 . Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01 /02 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 01 /02. 9 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. 1. Projected Ending Date January 15, 1995 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 In May 1995, monitors completed the unannounced visits of schools in Pulaski County. The monitoring process involved a qualitative process of document reviews, interviews, and observations. The monitoring focused on progress made since the announced monitoring visits. In June 1995, monitoring data from unannounced visits was included in the July Semiannual Report. Twenty-five per cent of all classrooms were visited, and all of the schools in Pulaski County were monitored. All principals were interviewed to determine any additional progress since the announced visits. The July 1995 Monitoring Report was reviewed by the ADE administrative team, the Arkansas State Board of Education, and the Districts and filed with the Court. The report was formatted in accordance with the Allen Letter. In October 1995, a common terminology was developed by principals from the Districts and the Lead Planning and Desegregation staff to facilitate the monitoring process. The announced monitoring visits began on November 14, 1995 and were completed on January 26, 1996. Copies of the preliminary Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the ADE administrative team and the State Board of Education in January 1996. A report on the current status of the Cycle 5 schools in the ECOE process and their school improvement plans was filed with the Court on February 1, 1996. The unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1996 and ended on May 10, 1996. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and the data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Districts provided data on enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Districts and the ADE Desegregation Monitoring staff developed a definition for instructional programs. 10 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 (Continued) The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996 with copies distributed to the parties. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996 and concluded in December 1996. In January 1997, presentations were made to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties to review the draft Semiannual Monitoring Report. The monitoring instrument and process were evaluated for their usefulness in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on achievement disparities. In February 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was filed. Unannounced monitoring visits began on February 3, 1997 and concluded in May 1997. In March 1997, letters were sent to the Districts regarding data requirements for the July 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and the additional discipline data element that was requested by the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Desegregation data collection workshops were conducted in the Districts from March 28, 1997 to April 7, 1997. A meeting was conducted on April 3, 1997 to finalize plans for the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report. Onsite visits were made to Cycle 1 schools who did not submit accurate and timely data on discipline, M-to-M transfers, and policy. The July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were finalized in June 1997. In July 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were filed with the court, and the ADE sponsored a School Improvement Conference. On July 10, 1997, copies of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were made available to the Districts for their review prior to filing it with the Court. In August 1997, procedures and schedules were organized for the monitoring of the Cycle 2 schools in FY 97/98. 11 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 (Continued) A Desegregation Monitoring and School Improvement Workshop for the Districts was held on September 10, 1997 to discuss monitoring expectations, instruments, data collection and school improvement visits. On October 9, 1997, a planning meeting was held with the desegregation monitoring staff to discuss deadlines, responsibilities, and strategic planning issues regarding the Semiannual Monitoring Report. Reminder letters were sent to the Cycle 2 principals outlining the data collection deadlines and availability of technical assistance. In October and November 1997, technical assistance visits were conducted, and announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 2 schools were completed. In December 1997 and January 1998, technical assistance visits were conducted regarding team visits, technical review recommendations, and consensus building. Copies of the infusion document and perceptual surveys were provided to schools in the ECOE process. The February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report was submitted for review and approval to the State Board of Education, the Director, the Administrative Team, the Attorney General's Office, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process, external team visits and finalizing school improvement plans. On February 18, 1998, the representatives of all parties met to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. Additional meetings will be scheduled. Unannounced monitoring visits were conducted in March 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process and external team visits. In April 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were conducted, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. 12 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 (Continued) In May 1998, unannounced monitoring vis its were completed, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. On May 18, 1998, the Court granted the ADE relief from its obligation to file the July 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report to develop proposed modifications to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. In June 1998, monitoring information previously submitted by the districts in the Spring of 1998 was reviewed and prepared for historical files and presentation to the Arkansas State Board. Also, in June the following occurred: a) The Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed, b) the Semiannual Monitoring COE Data Report was completed, c) progress reports were submitted from previous cycles, and d.) staff development on assessment (SA T-9) and curriculum alignment was conducted with three supervisors. In July, the Lead Planner provided the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee with (1) a review of the court Order relieving ADE of its obligation to file a July Semiannual Monitoring Report, and (2) an update of ADE's progress toward work with the parties and ODM to develop proposed revisions to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. The Committee encouraged ODM, the parties and the ADE to continue to work toward revision of the monitoring and reporting process. In August 1998, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Attorney General, the Assistant Director for Accountability and the Education Lead Planner updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and proposed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. In September 1998, tentative monitoring dates were established and they will be finalized once proposed revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring Plan are finalized and approved. In September/October 1998, progress was being made on the proposed revisions to the monitoring process by committee representatives of all the Parties in the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement. While the revised monitoring plan is finalized and approved, the ADE monitoring staff will continue to provide technical assistance to schools upon request. 13 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 (Continued) In December 1998, requests were received from schools in PCSSD regarding test score analysis and staff Development. Oak Grove is scheduled for January 21, 1999 and Lawson Elementary is also tentatively scheduled in January. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD has been rescheduled for April 2000. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD was conducted on May 5, 2000 and May 9, 2000 respectively. Staff development regarding classroom management was provided to the Franklin Elementary School in LRSD on November 8, 2000. Staff development regarding ways to improve academic achievement was presented to College Station Elementary in PCSSD on November 22, 2000. On November 1, 2000, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Director for Accountability updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and discussed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for February 27, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group meeting that was scheduled for February 27 had to be postponed. It will be rescheduled as soon as possible. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting is scheduled for June 27, 2001 . The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from June 27. It will take place on July 26, 2001 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 14 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 (Continued) On July 26, 2001 , the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 11 , 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. On October 11, 2001 , the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the ADE's intent to take a proactive role in Desegregation Monitoring. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 10, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. T.tle _lmpieme.ntation Phase _ Working Group Mee.ting tfiat was schedqledjqr J~oyar.y:J O was po~tponedi If has been rescheduled for February 14\n2002Jn ro6rh201-A afthe ADE. 15 Ill. A PETITION FOR ELECTION FOR LRSD WILL BE SUPPORTED SHOULD A MILLAGE BE REQUIRED A. Monitor court pleadings to determine if LRSD has petitioned the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing. 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 Ongoing. All Court pleadings are monitored monthly. B. Draft and file appropriate pleadings if LRSD petitions the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 To date, no action has been taken by the LRSD. 16 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION A. Using a collaborative approach, immediately identify those laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date December, 1994 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV. E. of this report. B. Conduct a review within ADE of existing legislation and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV. E. of this report. C. Request of the other parties to the Settlement Agreement that they identify laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. D. Submit proposals to the State Board of Education for repeal of those regulations that are confirmed to be impediments to desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. 17 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 A committee within the ADE was formed in May 1995 to review and collect data on existing legislation and regulations identified by the parties as impediments to desegregation. The committee researched the Districts' concerns to determine if any of the rules, regulations, or legislation cited impede desegregation. The legislation cited by the Districts regarding loss funding and worker's compensation were not reviewed because they had already been litigated. In September 1995, the committee reviewed the following statutes, acts, and regulations: Act 113 of 1993\nADE Director's Communication 93-205\nAct 145 of 1989\nADE Director's Memo 91-67\nADE Program Standards Eligibility Criteria for Special Education\nArkansas Codes 6-18-206, 6-20-307, 6-20-319, and 6-17- 1506. In October 1995, the individual reports prepared by committee members in their areas of expertise and the data used to support their conclusions were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. A report was prepared and submitted to the State Board of Education in July 1996. The report concluded that none of the items reviewed impeded desegregation. As of February 3, 1997, no laws or regulations have been determined to impede desegregation efforts. Any new education laws enacted during the Arkansas 81 st Legislative Session will be reviewed at the close of the legislative session to ensure that they do not impede desegregation. In April 1997, copies of all laws passed during the 1997 Regular Session of the 81 st General Assembly were requested from the office of the ADE Liaison to the Legislature for distribution to the Districts for their input and review of possible impediments to their desegregation efforts. In August 1997, a meeting to review the statutes passed in the prior legislative session was scheduled for September 9, 1997. 18 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 (Continued) On September 9, 1997, a meeting was held to discuss the review of the statutes passed in the prior legislative session and new ADE regulations. The Districts will be contacted in writing for their input regarding any new laws or regulations that they feel may impede desegregation. Additionally, the Districts will be asked to review their regulations to ensure that they do not impede their desegregation efforts. The committee will convene on December 1, 1997 to review their findings and finalize their report to the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. In October 1997, the Districts were asked to review new regulations and statutes for impediments to their desegregation efforts, and advise the ADE, in writing, if they feel a regulation or statute may impede their desegregation efforts. In October 1997, the Districts were requested to advise the ADE, in writing, no later than November 1, 1997 of any new law that might impede their desegregation efforts. As of November 12, 1997, no written responses were received from the Districts. The ADE concludes that the Districts do not feel that any new law negatively impacts their desegregation efforts. The committee met on December 1, 1997 to discuss their findings regarding statutes and regulations that may impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. The committee concluded that there were no laws or regulations that impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. It was decided that the committee chair would prepare a report of the committee's findings for the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation is now reviewing proposed bills and regulations, as well as laws that are being signed in, for the current 1999 legislative session. They will continue to do so until the session is over. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation will meet on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The committee met on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The purpose of the meeting was to identify rules and regulations that might impede desegregation, and review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. This is a standing committee that is ongoing and a report will be submitted to the State Board of Education once the process is completed. 19 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 (Continued) The committee met on May 24, 1999 at the ADE. The committee was asked to review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. The committee determined that Mr. Ray Lumpkin would contact the Pulaski County districts to request written response to any rules, regulations or laws that might impede desegregation. The committee would also collect information and data to prepare a report for the State Board. This will be a standing committee. This data gathering will be ongoing until the final report is given to the State Board. On July 26, 1999, the committee met at the ADE. The committee did not report any laws or regulations that they currently thought would impede desegregation, and are still waiting for a response from the three districts in Pulaski County. The committee met on August 30, 1999 at the ADE to review rules and regulations that might impede desegregation. At that time, there were no laws under review that appeared to impede desegregation. In November, the three districts sent letters to the ADE stating that they have reviewed the laws passed by the 82nd legislative session as well as current rules \u0026amp; regulations and district policies to ensure that they have no ill effect on desegregation efforts. There was some concern from PCSSD concerning a charter school proposal in the Maumelle area. The work of the committee is on-going each month depending on the information that comes before the committee. Any rules, laws or regulations that would impede desegregation will be discussed and reported to the State Board of Education. On October 4, 2000, the ADE presented staff development for assistant superintendents in LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD regarding school laws of Arkansas. The ADE is in the process of forming a committee to review all Rules and Regulations from the ADE and State Laws that might impede desegregation. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will review all new laws that might impede desegregation once the 83rd General Assembly has completed this session. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will meet for the first time on June 11 , 2001 at 9:00 a. m. in room 204-A at the ADE. The committee will review all new laws that might impede desegregation that were passed during the 2001 Legislative Session. 20 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 (Continued) The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations rescheduled the meeting that was planned for June 11 , in order to review new regulations proposed to the State Board of Education. The meeting will take place on July 16, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on July 16, 2001 at the ADE. The following Items were discussed: (1) Review of 2001 state laws which appear to impede desegregation. (2) Review of existing ADE regulations which appear to impede desegregation. (3) Report any laws or regulations found to impede desegregation to the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts. The next meeting will take place on August 27, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on August 27, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on September 10, 2001 in Conference Room 204-B at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on September 10, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on October 24, 2001 in Conference Room 204-B at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on October 24, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. On December 17, 2001, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation composed letters that will be sent to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. Laws to review include those of the 83rd General Assembly, ADE regulations, and regulations of the Districts. 21 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 (Continued) On January 10, 2002, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to respond by March 8, 2002. 22 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES A. Through a preamble to the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 The preamble was contained in the Implementation Plan filed with the Court on March 15, 1994. B. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 Ongoing C. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement by actions taken by ADE in response to monitoring results. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 Ongoing D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 23 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project ManagementTool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 At each regular monthly meeting of the State Board of Education, the Board is provided copies of the most recent Project Management Tool (PMT) and an executive summary of the PMT for their review and approval. Only activities that are in addition to the Board's monthly review of the PMT are detailed below. In May 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the total number of schools visited during the monitoring phase and the data collection process. Suggestions were presented to the State Board of Education on how recommendations could be presented in the monitoring reports. In June 1995, an update on the status of the pending Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the State Board of Education. In July 1995, the July Semiannual Monitoring Report was reviewed by the State Board of Education. On August 14, 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the need to increase minority participation in the teacher scholarship program and provided tentative monitoring dates to facilitate reporting requests by the ADE administrative team and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In September 1995, the State Board of Education was advised of a change in the PMT from a table format to a narrative format. The Board was also briefed about a meeting with the Office of Desegregation Monitoring regarding the PMT. In October 1995, the State Board of Education was updated on monitoring timelines. The Board was also informed of a meeting with the parties regarding a review of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and the monitoring process, and the progress of the test validation study. In November 1995, a report was made to the State Board of Education regarding the monitoring schedule and a meeting with the parties concerning the development of a common terminology for monitoring purposes. In December 1995, the State Board of Education was updated regarding announced monitoring visits. In January 1996, copies of the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the State Board of Education. 24 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 (Continued) During the months of February 1996 through May 1996, the PMT report was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. In June 1996, the State Board of Education was updated on the status of the bias review study. In July 1996, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the Court, the parties, ODM, the State Board of Education, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In August 1996, the State Board of Education and the ADE administrative team were provided with copies of the test validation study prepared by Dr. Paul Williams. During the months of September 1996 through December 1996, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. On January 13, 1997, a presentation was made to the State Board of Education regarding the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report, and copies of the report and its executive summary were distributed to all Board members. The Project Management Tool and its executive summary were addressed at the February 10, 1997 State Board of Education meeting regarding the ADE's progress in fulfilling their obligations as set forth in the Implementation Plan. In March 1997, the State Board of Education was notified that historical information in the PMT had been summarized at the direction of the Assistant Attorney General in order to reduce the size and increase the clarity of the report. The Board was updated on the Pulaski County Desegregation Case and reviewed the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued by the Court on February 18, 1997 in response to the Districts' motion for summary judgment on the issue of state funding for teacher retirement matching contributions. During the months of April 1997 through June 1997, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. The State Board of Education received copies of the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and executive summary at the July Board meeting. 25 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 (Continued) The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on August 4, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. A special report regarding a historical review of the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement and the ADE's role and monitoring obligations were presented to the State Board of Education on September 8, 1997. Additionally, the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Board for their review. In October 1997, a special draft report regarding disparity in achievement was submitted to the State Board Chairman and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In November 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on November 3, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. In December 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. In January 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and discussed ODM's report on the ADE's monitoring activities and instructed the Director to meet with the parties to discuss revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. In February 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and discussed the February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report. In March 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary and was provided an update regarding proposed revisions to the monitoring process. In April 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In May 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. 26 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 (Continued) In June 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also reviewed how the ADE would report progress in the PMT concerning revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In July 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also received an update on Test Validation, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee Meeting, and revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In August 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the five discussion points regarding the proposed revisions to the monitoring and reporting process. The Board also reviewed the basic goal of the Minority Recruitment Committee. In September 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed the proposed modifications to the Monitoring plans by reviewing the common core of written response received from the districts. The primary commonalities were (1) Staff Development, (2) Achievement Disparity and (3) Disciplinary Disparity. A meeting of the parties is scheduled to be conducted on Thursday, September 17, 1998. The Board encouraged the Department to identify a deadline for Standardized Test Validation and Test Selection. In October 1998, the Board received the progress report on Proposed Revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring and Reporting Process (see XVIII). The Board also reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In November, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the proposed revisions in the Desegregation monitoring Process and the update on Test validation and Test Selection provisions of the Settlement Agreement. The Board was also notified that the Implementation Plan Working Committee held its quarterly meeting to review progress and identify quarterly priorities. In December, the State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion by the ADE, the LRSD, NLRSD, and the PCSSD, to relieve the Department of its obligation to file a February Semiannual Monitoring Report. The Board was also notified that the Joshua lntervenors filed a motion opposing the joint motion. The Board was informed that the ADE was waiting on a response from Court. 27 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's ProjectManagementTool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 (Continued) In January, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion of the ADE, LRSD, PCSSD, and NLRSD for an order relieving the ADE of filing a February 1999 Monitoring Report. The motion was granted subject to the following three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua intervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement. In February, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was informed that the three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua lntervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement had been satisfied. The Joshua lntervenors were invited again to attend the meeting of the parties and they attended on January 13, and January 28, 1999. They are also scheduled to attend on February 17, 1998. The report of progress, a collaborative effort from all parties was presented to court on February 1, 1999. The Board was also informed that additional items were received for inclusion in the revised report, after the deadline for the submission of the progress report and the ADE would: (1) check them for feasibility, and fiscal impact if any, and (2) include the items in future drafts of the report. In March, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received and reviewed the Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Progress Report submitted to Court on February 1, 1999. On April 12, and May 10, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On June 14, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. 28 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 (Continued) On July 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On August 9, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On September 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On October 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was notified that on September 21 , 1999 that the Office of Education Lead Planning and Desegregation Monitoring meet before the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee and presented them with the draft version of the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan. The State Board was notified that the plan would be submitted for Board review and approval when finalized. On November 8, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. 29 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 (Continued) On May 8, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 12, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 11 , 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 9, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 11, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 8, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 12, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 12, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 9, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 14, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 11, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. 30 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 (Continued) On July 9, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 13, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 10, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 8, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 19, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 10, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. Q~:U~hii~r1:ii1/2.[qg1\n:tH~:lti~~n~~:~i~i ~Bq~(.~\\p.f :Ed~tion r.eviewed and approved tfleJ\u0026gt;Mt:aoct.tt:s''~i~tuJive'su.mmaiy'f6H he-.,,ootfioroec~mber. 31 VI. REMEDIATION A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 During May 1995, team visits to Cycle 4 schools were conducted, and plans were developed for reviewing the Cycle 5 schools. In June 1995, the current Extended COE packet was reviewed, and enhancements to the Extended COE packet were prepared. In July 1995, year end reports were finalized by the Pulaski County field service specialists, and plans were finalized for reviewing the draft improvement plans of the Cycle 5 schools. In August 1995, Phase I - Cycle 5 school improvement plans were reviewed. Plans were developed for meeting with the Districts to discuss plans for Phase II - Cycle 1 schools of Extended COE, and a school improvement conference was conducted in Hot Springs. The technical review visits for the FY 95/96 year and the documentation process were also discussed. In October 1995, two computer programs, the Effective Schools Planner and the Effective Schools Research Assistant, were ordered for review, and the first draft of a monitoring checklist for Extended COE was developed. Through the Extended COE process, the field service representatives provided technical assistance based on the needs identified within the Districts from the data gathered. In November 1995, ADE personnel discussed and planned for the FY 95/96 monitoring, and onsite visits were conducted to prepare schools for the FY 95/96 team visits. Technical review visits continued in the Districts. In December 1995, announced monitoring and technical assistance visits were conducted in the Districts. At December 31 , 1995, approximately 59% of the schools in the Districts had been monitored. Technical review visits were conducted during January 1996. In February 1996, announced monitoring visits and midyear monitoring reports were completed, and the field service specialists prepared for the spring NCA/COE peer team visits. 32 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 (Continued) In March 1996, unannounced monitoring visits of Cycle 5 schools commenced, and two-day peer team visits of Cycle 5 schools were conducted. Two-day team visit materials, team lists and reports were prepared. Technical assistance was provided to schools in final preparation for team visits and to schools needing any school improvement information. In April and May 1996, the unannounced monitoring visits were completed. The unannounced monitoring forms were reviewed and included in the July monitoring report. The two-day peer team visits were completed, and annual COE monitoring reports were prepared. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits of the Cycle 5 schools were completed, and the data was analyzed. The Districts identified enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996, and copies were distributed to the parties. During August 1996, meetings were held with the Districts to discuss the monitoring requirements. Technical assistance meetings with Cycle 1 schools were planned for 96/97. The Districts were requested to record discipline data in accordance with the Allen Letter. In September 1996, recommendations regarding the ADE monitoring schedule for Cycle 1 schools and content layouts of the semiannual report were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. Training materials were developed and schedules outlined for Cycle 1 schools. In October 1996, technical assistance needs were identified and addressed to prepare each school for their team visits. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996. In December 1996, the announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools were completed, and technical assistance needs were identified from school site visits. In January 1997, the ECOE monitoring section identified technical assistance needs of the Cycle 1 schools, and the data was reviewed when the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, the State Board of Education, and the parties. 33 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 (Continued) In February 1997, field service specialists prepared for the peer team visits of the Cycle 1 schools. NCA accreditation reports were presented to the NCA Committee, and NCA reports were prepared for presentation at the April NCA meeting in Chicago. From March to May 1997, 111 visits were made to schools or central offices to work with principals, ECOE steering committees, and designated district personnel concerning school improvement planning. A workshop was conducted on Learning Styles for Geyer Springs Elementary School. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 15-17, 1997. The conference included information on the process of continuous school improvement, results of the first five years of COE, connecting the mission with the school improvement plan, and improving academic performance. Technical assistance needs were evaluated for the FY 97 /98 school year in August 1997. From October 1997 to February 1998, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives. Technical assistance was provided to the Districts through meetings with the ECOE steering committees, assistance in analyzing perceptual surveys, and by providing samples of school improvement plans, Gold File catalogs, and web site addresses to schools visited. Additional technical assistance was provided to the Districts through discussions with the ECOE committees and chairs about the process. In November 1997, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives in conjunction with the announced monitoring visits. Workshops on brainstorming and consensus building and asking strategic questions were held in January and February 1998. In March 1998, the field service representatives conducted ECOE team visits and prepared materials for the NCA workshop. Technical assistance was provided in workshops on the ECOE process and team visits. In April 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process and academically distressed schools. In May 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process, and team visits were conducted. 34 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 (Continued) In June 1998, the Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 13-15, 1998. Major conference topics included information on the process of continuous school improvement, curriculum alignment, \"Smart Start,\" Distance Learning, using data to improve academic performance, educational technology, and multicultural education. All school districts in Arkansas were invited and representatives from Pulaski County attended. In September 1998, requests for technical assistance were received, visitation schedules were established, and assistance teams began visiting the Districts. Assistance was provided by telephone and on-site visits. The ADE provided inservice training on \"Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement\" at Gibbs Magnet Elementary school on October 5, 1998 at their request. The staff was taught how to increase test scores through data disaggregation, analysis, alignment, longitudinal achievement review, and use of individualized test data by student, teacher, class and content area. Information was also provided regarding the \"Smart Start\" and the \"Academic Distress\" initiatives. On October 20, 1998, ECOE technical assistance was provided to Southwest Jr. High School. B. Identify available resources for providing technical assistance for the specific condition, or circumstances of need, considering resources within ADE and the Districts, and also resources available from outside sources and experts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. C. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 35 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) C. D. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 An updated ERIC Search was conducted on May 15, 1995 to locate research on evaluating compensatory education programs. The ADE received the updated ERIC disc that covered material through March 1995. An ERIC search was conducted in September 30, 1996 to identify current research dealing with the evaluation of compensatory education programs, and the articles were reviewed. An ERIC search was conducted in April 1997 to identify current research on compensatory education programs and sent to the Cycle 1 principals and the field service specialists for their use. An Eric search was conducted in October 1998 on the topic of Compensatory Education and related descriptors. The search included articles with publication dates from 1997 through July 1998. Identify and research technical resources available to ADE and the Districts through programs and organizations such as the Desegregation Assistance Center in San Antonio, Texas. 1. Projected Ending Date Summer 1994 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI. F. of this report. E. Solicit, obtain, and use available resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. 36 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 From March 1995 through July 1995, technical assistance and resources were obtained from the following sources: the Southwest Regional Cooperative\nUALR regarding training for monitors\nODM on a project management software\nADHE regarding data review and display\nand Phi Delta Kappa, the Desegregation Assistance Center and the Dawson Cooperative regarding perceptual surveys. Technical assistance was received on the Microsoft Project software in November 1995, and a draft of the PMT report using the new software package was presented to the ADE administrative team for review. In December 1995, a data manager was hired permanently to provide technical assistance with computer software and hardware. In October 1996, the field service specialists conducted workshops in the Districts to address their technical assistance needs and provided assistance for upcoming team visits. In November and December 1996, the field service specialists addressed technical assistance needs of the schools in the Districts as they were identified and continued to provide technical assistance for the upcoming team visits. In January 1997, a draft of the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties. The ECOE monitoring section of the report included information that identified technical assistance needs and resources available to the Cycle 1 schools. Technical assistance was provided during the January 29-31 , 1997 Title I MidWinter Conference. The conference emphasized creating a learning community by building capacity schools to better serve all children and empowering parents to acquire additional skills and knowledge to better support the education of their children. In February 1997, three ADE employees attended the Southeast Regional Conference on Educating Black Children. Participants received training from national experts who outlined specific steps that promote and improve the education of black children. 37 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 (Continued) On March 6-9, 1997, three members of the ADE's Technical Assistance Section attended the National Committee for School Desegregation Conference. The participants received training in strategies for Excellence and Equity: Empowerment and Training for the Future. Specific information was received regarding the current status of court-ordered desegregation, unitary status, and resegregation and distributed to the Districts and ADE personnel. The field service specialists attended workshops in March on ACT testing and school improvement to identify technical assistance resources available to the Districts and the ADE that will facilitate desegregation efforts. ADE personnel attended the Eighth Annual Conference on Middle Level Education in Arkansas presented by the Arkansas Association of Middle Level Education on April 6-8, 1997. The theme of the conference was Sailing Toward New Horizons. In May 1997, the field service specialists attended the NCA annual conference and an inservice session with Mutiu Fagbayi. An Implementation Oversight Committee member participated in the Consolidated COE Plan inservice training. In June and July 1997, field service staff attended an SAT-9 testing workshop and participated in the three-day School Improvement Conference held in Hot Springs. The conference provided the Districts with information on the COE school improvement process, technical assistance on monitoring and assessing achievement, availability of technology for the classroom teacher, and teaching strategies for successful student achievement. In August 1997, field service personnel attended the ASCD Statewide Conference and the AAEA Administrators Conference. On August 18, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held and presentations were made on the Early Literacy Learning in Arkansas (ELLA) program and the Schools of the 21st Century program. In September 1997, technical assistance was provided to the Cycle 2 principals on data collection for onsite and offsite monitoring. ADE personnel attended the Region VI Desegregation Conference in October 1997. Current desegregation and educational equity cases and unitary status issues were the primary focus of the conference. On October 14, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held in Paragould to enable members to observe a 21st Century school and a school that incorporates traditional and multi-age classes in its curriculum. 38 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 (Continued) In November 1997, the field service representatives attended the Governor's Partnership Workshop to discuss how to tie the committee's activities with the ECOE process. In March 1998, the field service representatives attended a school improvement conference and conducted workshops on team building and ECOE team visits. Staff development seminars on Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement are scheduled for March 23, 1998 and March 27, 1998 for the Districts. In April 1998, the Districts participated in an ADE seminar to aid them in evaluating and improving student achievement. In August 1998, the Field Service Staff attended inservice to provide further assistance to schools, i.e., Title I Summer Planning Session, ADE session on Smart Start, and the School Improvement Workshops. All schools and districts in Pulaski County were invited to attend the \"Smart Start\" Summit November 9, 10, and 11 to learn more about strategies to increase student performance. \"Smart Start\" is a standards-driven educational initiative which emphasizes the articulation of clear standards for student achievement and accurate measures of progress against those standards through assessments, staff development and individual school accountability. The Smart Start Initiative focused on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. Representatives from all three districts attended. On January 21 , 1998, the ADE provided staff development for the staff at Oak Grove Elementary School designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement. Using achievement data from Oak Grove, educators reviewed trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. On February 24, 1999, the ADE provided staff development for the administrative staff at Clinton Elementary School regarding analysis of achievement data. On February 15, 1999, staff development was rescheduled for Lawson Elementary School. The staff development program was designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement using achievement data from Lawson, educators reviewed the components of the Arkansas Smart Initiative, trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. Student Achievement Workshops were rescheduled for Southwest Jr. High in the Little Rock School District, and the Oak Grove Elementary School in the Pulaski County School District. 39 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 (Continued) On April 30, 1999, a Student Achievement Workshop was conducted for Oak Grove Elementary School in PCSSD. The Student Achievement Workshop for Southwest Jr. High in LRSD has been rescheduled. On June 8, 1999, a workshop was presented to representatives from each of the Arkansas Education Service Cooperatives and representatives from each of the three districts in Pulaski County. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACTAAP). On June 18, 1999, a workshop was presented to administrators of the NLRSD. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACTAAP) . On August 16, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACTAAP program was presented during the preschool staff development activities for teaching assistant in the LRSD. On August 20, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACT AAP program was presented during the preschool staff development activities for the Accelerated Learning Center in the LRSD. On September 13, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACT AAP program were presented to the staff at Booker T. Washington Magnet Elementary School. On September 27, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was presented to the Middle and High School staffs of the NLRSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On October 26, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was presented to LRSD personnel through a staff development training class. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On December 7, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was scheduled for Southwest Middle School in the LRSD. The workshop was also set to cover the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. However, Southwest Middle School administrators had a need to reschedule, therefore the workshop will be rescheduled. 40 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 (Continued) On January 10, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for both Dr. Martin Luther King Magnet Elementary School \u0026amp; Little Rock Central High School. The workshops also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On March 1, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for all principals and district level administrators in the PCSSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On April 12, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for the LRSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. Targeted staffs from the middle and junior high schools in the three districts in Pulaski County attended the Smart Step Summit on May 1 and May 2. Training was provided regarding the overview of the \"Smart Step\" initiative, \"Standard and Accountability in Action,\" and \"Creating Learning Environments Through Leadership Teams.\" The ADE provided training on the development of alternative assessment September 12-13, 2000. Information was provided regarding the assessment of Special Education and LEP students. Representatives from each district were provided the opportunity to select a team of educators from each school within the district to participate in professional development regarding Integrating Curriculum and Assessment K-12. The professional development activity was directed by the national consultant, Dr. Heidi Hays Jacobs, on September 14 and 15, 2000. The ADE provided professional development workshops from October 2 through October 13, 2000 regarding, 'The Write Stuff: Curriculum Frameworks, Content Standards and Item Development.\" Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation provided the training. Representatives from each district were provided the opportunity to select a team of educators from each school within the district to participate. The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems by video conference for Special Education and LEP Teachers on November 17, 2000. Also, Alternative Assessment Portfolio System Training was provided for testing coordinators through teleconference broadcast on November 27, 2000. 41 VI . REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 (Continued) On December 12, 2000, the ADE provided training for Test Coordinators on end of course assessments in Geometry and Algebra I Pilot examination. Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation conducted the professional development at the Arkansas Teacher Retirement Building. The ADE presented a one-day training session with Dr. Cecil Reynolds on the Behavior Assessment for Children (BASC). This took place on December 7, 2000 at the NLRSD Administrative Annex. Dr. Reynolds is a practicing clinical psychologist. He is also a professor at Texas A \u0026amp; M University and a nationally known author. In the training, Dr. Reynolds addressed the following: 1) how to use and interpret information obtained on the direct observation form, 2) how to use this information for programming, 3) when to use the BASC, 4) when to refer for more or additional testing or evaluation, 5) who should complete the forms and when, (i.e. , parents, teachers, students), 6) how to correctly interpret scores. This training was intended to especially benefit School Psychology Specialists, psychologists, psychological examiners, educational examiners and counselors. During January 22-26, 2001 the ADE presented the ACTAAP Intermediate (Grade 6) Benchmark Professional Development Workshop on Item Writing. Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation provided the training. Representatives from each district were invited to attend. On January 12, 2001 the ADE presented test administrators training for mid-year End of Course (Pilot) Algebra I and Geometry exams. This was provided for schools with block scheduling. On January 13, 2001 the ADE presented SmartScience Lessons and worked with teachers to produce curriculum. This was shared with eight Master Teachers. The SmartScience Lessons were developed by the Arkansas Science Teachers Association in conjunction with the Wilbur Mills Educational Cooperative under an Eisenhower grant provided by the ADE. The purpose of SmartScience is to provide K-6 teachers with activity-oriented science lessons that incorporate reading, writing, and mathematics skills. The following training has been provided for educators in the three districts in Pulaski County by the Division of Special Education at the ADE since January 2000: On January 6, 2000, training was conducted for the Shannon Hills Pre-school Program, entitled \"Things you can do at home to support your child's learning.\" This was presented by Don Boyd - ASERC and Shelley Weir. The school's director and seven parents attended. 42 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 (Continued) On March 8, 2000, training was conducted for the Southwest Middle School in Little Rock, on ADD. Six people attended the training. There was follow-up training on Learning and Reading Styles on March 26. This was presented by Don Boyd - ASERC and Shelley Weir. On September 7, 2000, Autism and Classroom Accommodations for the LRSD at Chicot Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Karen Sabo, Kindergarten Teacher\nMelissa Gleason, Paraprofessional\nCurtis Mayfield, P.E. Teacher\nLisa Poteet, Speech Language Pathologist\nJane Harkey, Principal\nKathy Penn-Norman, Special Education Coordinator\nAlice Phillips, Occupational Therapist. On September 15, 2000, the Governor's Developmental Disability Coalition Conference presented Assistive Technology Devices \u0026amp; Services. This was held at the Arlington Hotel in Hot Springs. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On September 19, 2000, Autism and Classroom Accommodations for the LRSD at Jefferson Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Melissa Chaney, Special Education Teacher\nBarbara Barnes, Special Education Coordinator\na Principal, a Counselor, a Librarian, and a Paraprofessional. On October 6, 2000, Integrating Assistive Technology Into Curriculum was presented at a conference in the Hot Springs Convention Center. Presenters were: Bryan Ayers and Aleecia Starkey. Speech Language Pathologists from LRSD and NLRSD attended. On October 24, 2000, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On October 25 and 26, 2000, Alternate Assessment for Students with Severe Disabilities for the LRSD at J. A. Fair High School was presented. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. The participants were: Susan Chapman, Special Education Coordinator\nMary Steele, Special Education Teacher\nDenise Nesbit, Speech Language Pathologist\nand three Paraprofessionals. On November 14, 2000, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On November 17, 2000, training was conducted on Autism for the LRSD at the Instructional Resource Center. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. 43 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 (Continued) On December 5, 2000, Access to the Curriculum Via the use of Assistive Technology Computer Lab was presented. Bryan Ayres was the presenter of this teleconference. The participants were: Tim Fisk, Speech Language Pathologist from Arch Ford Education Service Cooperative at Plumerville and Patsy Lewis, Special Education Teacher from Mabelvale Middle School in the LRSD. On January 9, 2001, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. Kathy Brown, a vision consultant from the LRSD, was a participant. On January 23, 2001, Autism and Classroom Modifications for the LRSD at Brady Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Beverly Cook, Special Education Teacher\nAmy Littrell, Speech Language Pathologist\nJan Feurig, Occupational Therapist\nCarolyn James, Paraprofessional\nCindy Kackly, Paraprofessional\nand Rita Deloney, Paraprofessional. The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems for Special Education and Limited English Proficient students through teleconference broadcast on February 5, 2001 . Presenters were: Charlotte Marvel, ADE\nDr. Gayle Potter, ADE\nMarcia Harding, ADE\nLynn Springfield, ASERC\nMary Steele, J. A. Fair High School, LRSD\nBryan Ayres, Easter Seals Outreach. This was provided for Special Education teachers and supervisors in the morning, and Limited English Proficient teachers and supervisors in the afternoon. The Special Education session was attended by 29 teachers/administrators and provided answers to specific questions about the alternate assessment portfolio system and the scoring rubric and points on the rubric to be used to score the portfolios. The LEP session was attended by 16 teachers/administrators and disseminated the common tasks to be included in the portfolios: one each in mathematics, writing and reading. On February 12-23, 2001 , the ADE and Data Recognition Corporation personnel trained Test Coordinators in the administration of the spring Criterion-Referenced Test. This was provided in 20 sessions at 10 regional sites. Testing protocol, released items, and other testing materials were presented and discussed. The sessions provided training for Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy, Algebra and Geometry Pilot Tests. The LRSD had 2 in attendance for the End of Course session and 2 for the Benchmark session. The NLRSD had 1 in attendance for the End of Course session and 1 for the Benchmark session. The PCSSD had 1 in attendance for the End of Course session and 1 for the Benchmark session. 44 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 (Continued) On March 15, 2001 , there was a meeting at the ADE to plan professional development for staff who work with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) students. A $30,000 grant has been created to provide LEP training at Chicot Elementary for a year, starting in April 2001 . A $40,000 grant was created to provide a Summer English as Second Language (ESL) Academy for the LRSD from June 18 through 29, 2001 . Andre Guerrero from the ADE Accountability section met with Karen Broadnax, ESL Coordinator at LRSD, Pat Price, Early Childhood Curriculum Supervisor at LRSD, and Jane Harkey, Principal of Chicot Elementary. On March 1-2 and 8-29, 2001 , ADE staff performed the following activities: processed registration for April 2 and 3 Alternate Portfolio Assessment video conference quarterly meeting\nanswered questions about Individualized Educational Plan (IEP) and LEP Alternate Portfolio Assessment by phone from schools and Education Service Cooperatives\nand signed up students for alternate portfolio assessment from school districts. On March 6, 2001 , ADE staff attended a Smart Step Technology Leadership Conference at the State House Convention Center. On March 7, 2001, ADE staff attended a National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Regional Math Framework Meeting about the Consensus Project 2004. On March 8, 2001 , there was a one-on-one conference with Carole Villarreal from Pulaski County at the ADE about the LEP students with portfolios. She was given pertinent data, including all the materials that have been given out at the video conferences. The conference lasted for at least an hour. On March 14, 2001 , a Test Administrator's Training Session was presented specifically to LRSD Test Coordinators and Principals. About 60 LRSD personnel attended. The following meetings have been conducted with educators in the three districts in Pulaski County since July 2000. On July 10-13, 2000 the ADE provided Smart Step training. The sessions covered Standards-based classroom practices. 45 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 (Continued) On July 19-21 , 2000 the ADE held the Math/Science Leadership Conference at UCA. This provided services for Arkansas math and science teachers to support systemic reform in math/science and training for 8th grade Benchmark. There were 200 teachers from across the state in attendance. On August 14-31 , 2000 the ADE presented Science Smart Start Lessons and worked with teachers to produce curriculum. This will provide K-6 teachers with activity-oriented science lessons that incorporate reading, writing, and mathematics skills. On September 5, 2000 the ADE held an Eisenhower Informational meeting with Teacher Center Coordinators. The purpose of the Eisenhower Professional Development Program is to prepare teachers, school staff, and administrators to help all students meet challenging standards in the core academic subjects. A summary of the program was presented at the meeting. On November 2-3, 2000 the ADE held the Arkansas Conference on Teaching. This presented curriculum and activity workshops. More than 1200 attended the conference. On November 6, 2000 there was a review of Science Benchmarks and sample model curriculum. A committee of 6 reviewed and revised a drafted document. The committee was made up of ADE and K-8 teachers. On November 7-10, 2000 the ADE held a meeting of the Benchmark and End of Course Mathematics Content Area Committee. Classroom teachers reviewed items for grades 4, 6, 8 and EOC mathematics assessment. There were 60 participants. On December 4-8, 2000 the ADE conducted grades 4 and 8 Benchmark Scoring for Writing Assessment. This professional development was attended by approximately 750 teachers. On December 8, 2000 the ADE conducted Rubric development for Special Education Portfolio scoring. This was a meeting with special education supervisors to revise rubric and plan for scoring in June. On December 8, 2000 the ADE presented the Transition Mathematics Pilot Training Workshop. This provided follow-up training and activities for fourth-year mathematics professional development. On December 12, 2000 the ADE presented test administrators training for midyear End of Course (Pilot) Algebra I and Geometry exams. This was provided for schools with block scheduling. 46 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 (Continued) The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems for Special Education and Limited English Proficient students through teleconference broadcasts on April 2-3, 2001 . Administration of the Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy took place on April 23-27, 2001 . Administration of the End of Course Algebra and Geometry Exams took place on May 2-3, 2001 . Over 1,100 Arkansas educators attended the Smart Step Growing Smarter Conference on July 10 and 11, 2001 , at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center. Smart Step focuses on improving student achievement for Grades 5-8. The Smart Step effort seeks to provide intense professional development for teachers and administrators at the middle school level, as well as additional materials and assistance to the state's middle school teachers. The event began with opening remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. Carl Boyd, a longtime educator and staff consultant for Learning 24-7, presented the first keynote address on \"The Character-Centered Teacher''. Debra Pickering, an education consultant from Denver, Colorado, presented the second keynote address on \"Characteristics of Middle Level Education\". Throughout the Smart Step conference, educators attended breakout sessions that were grade-specific and curriculum area-specific. Pat Davenport, an education consultant from Houston, Texas, delivered two addresses. She spoke on \"A Blueprint for Raising Student Achievement\". Representatives from all three districts in Pulaski County attended. Over 1,200 Arkansas teachers and administrators attended the Smart Start Conference on July 12, 2001, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center. Smart Start is a standards-driven educational initiative which emphasizes the articulation of clear standards for student achievement and accurate measures of progress against those standards through assessments, staff development and individual school accountability. The Smart Start Initiative focused on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. The event began with opening remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. Carl Boyd, a longtime educator and staff consultant for Learning 24-7, presented the keynote address. The day featured a series of 15 breakout sessions on best classroom practices. Representatives from all three districts in Pulaski County attended. On July 18-20, 2001 , the ADE held the Math/Science Leadership Conference at UCA. This provided services for Arkansas math and science teachers to support systemic reform in math/science and training for 8th grade Benchmark. There were approximately 300 teachers from across the state in attendance. 47 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 (Continued) The ADE and Harcourt Educational Measurement conducted Stanford 9 test administrator training from August 1-9, 2001 . The training was held at Little Rock, Jonesboro, Fort Smith, Forrest City, Springdale, Mountain Home, Prescott, and Monticello. Another session was held at the ADE on August 30, for those who were unable to attend August 1-9. The ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by video conference at the Education Service Cooperatives and at the ADE from 9:00 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on September 5, 2001 . The ADE released the performance of all schools on the Primary and Middle Level Benchmark Exams on September 5, 2001 . The ADE conducted Transition Core Teacher In-Service training for Central in the LRSD on September 6, 2001 . The ADE conducted Transition Checklist training for Hall in the LRSD on September 7, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Checklist training for McClellan in the LRSD on September 13, 2001. The ADE conducted Basic Co-teaching training for the LRSD on October 9, 2001 . The ADE conducted training on autism spectrum disorder for the PCSSD on October 15, 2001 . Professional Development workshops (1 day in length) in scoring End of Course assessments in algebra, geometry and reading were provided for all districts in the state. Each school was invited to send three representatives (one for each of the sessions). LRSD, NLRSD, and PCSSD participated. Information and training materials pertaining to the Alternate Portfolio Assessment were provided to all districts in the state and were supplied as requested to LRSD, PCSSD and David 0. Dodd Elementary. On November 1-2, 2001 the ADE held the Arkansas Conference on Teaching at the Excelsior Hotel \u0026amp; Statehouse Convention Center. This presented sessions, workshops and short courses to promote exceptional teaching and learning. Educators could become involved in integrated math, science, English \u0026amp; language arts and social studies learning. The ADE received from the schools selected to participate in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), a list of students who will take the test. 48 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 (Continued) cin\"t:fec~tob~r::17\n2001 tti~ADEti\u0026gt;ridtrct~ctgrades Bencrntl~rt\u0026lt;sdBri~[tr.aining Fo{tadio'd. arii(rn~ili~::~chli~iH0or:8,1trict=wa$i:lt1vit~\u0026lt;lito 'i~nd '~:'rr.1atHi~rtcf:~ reaaii)\"g $P~d~iiift~Jr~imng'w.as ti~id a.ttfie Hoiiday' Inn Airport ln Littled{Qcl.c: !llitt~:iliti!iiili\nir~~r\n=tz:~:.mr~ti 49 VII. TEST VALIDATION A. Using a collaborative approach, the ADE will select and contract with an independent bias review service or expert to evaluate the Stanford 8, or other monitoring instruments used to measure disparities in academic achievement between black students and white students. 1. Projected Ending Date March, 1995 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 On March 29, 1995, letters were sent to four national experts about conducting a test bias validation of the Stanford Achievement Test, Eighth Edition, Form K (SAT-8). Dr. Paul Williams, Deputy Director of Educational Testing Service (ETS), contacted the ADE in April of 1995 concerning the proposal for validating the SAT-8 test. The ADE requested that Dr. Williams conduct a validity study of test items used in the SA T-8. Dr. Williams submitted a final proposal for his services. The ADE Bias Review Test Committee met Friday, July 7, 1995, and approved Dr. William's contract proposal. The final contract was forwarded to Dr. Williams for his signature. The contract was signed in August 1995, thereby, completing this goal. B. By April 1994, establish a bias review committee to oversee the bias review process, and invite representatives of the Districts and parties to meet with the bias review committee. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 Complete. ADE established a Bias Review Committee in April 1994. In accordance with the Implementation Plan, representatives from the Districts and the parties were invited to attend and participate in this and all meetings of the Bias Review Committee. C. Upon completion of test validation procedures by the bias review service or expert, the ADE will adopt and use a validated test as a monitoring instrument. 1. Projected Ending Date March 1995 and ongoing 50 VII. TEST VALIDATION (Continued) C. Upon completion of test validation procedures by the bias review service or expert, the ADE will adopt and use a validated test as a monitoring instrument. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 Dr. Paul Williams met with the staff of the Psychological Corporation to review their methods and procedures. In August 1995, he met with the staff at Georgia State University to review the statistical methods that would be used in the analysis. Dr. Williams reported difficulty with the bias-review study in receiving the names of the bias panel and the complete SAT-8 data set from the Psychological Corporation. Dr. Williams submitted an invoice totaling $8,961 for Task I activities of the SAT-8 validity study for partial fulfillment of the test validation study. On December 6, 1995, a contract extension for Dr. Williams was reviewed by the Legislative Council. In January 1996, he indicated that he was in the final stages of the test validation, and the ADE was presented a draft report in March 1996. In May 1996, Dr. Williams stated that the wrong data sets were sent to him by the Psychological Corporation resulting in Task 3 having to be redone. A new draft of the final report was received by the ADE in July 1996. In August 1996, copies of the test validation report were provided to the State Board of Education and the ADE administrative team for their review. On September 10, 1996, the LRSD notified the ADE that they had reviewed the test validation report and would like to meet with the ADE to discuss the report. The ADE Director indicated that he would schedule a meeting with the LRSD to discuss the report. In October 1996, historical files and data were provided to the ADE Director, the ADE Assistant Director for Technical Services, and the ADE Assistant Director for Planning and Curriculum for their review in preparation for a meeting with the LRSD regarding the validity study. Test validation procedures by the expert have been completed. A recommendation was drafted proposing the use of the SAT-8 by the ADE as the validated test for monitoring. The ADE is presently working to arrange a meeting with the Administration of the LRSD to discuss the test validation study. Effective September 22, 1997, the State Board of Education hired a new Director of the General Education Division, which should allow the ADE to move forward in this matter. 51 VII. TEST VALIDATION (Continued) C. Upon completion of test validation procedures by the bias review service or expert, the ADE will adopt and use a validated test as a monitoring instrument. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 (Continued) In October 1997, the GED Director was updated on the history of the test validation process to provide the Director with background information in preparation for a meeting with the LRSD. In February 1998, ADE staff met with senior staff members to discuss the test validation and appropriate test scores for consideration by the LRSD. The ADE Director met with the Superintendent of the LRSD to discuss test validation issues. In June 1998, the ADE Director directed the Assistant Director for Accountability to recommend staff to discuss how the ADE would measure LRSD's progress toward meeting the loan forgiveness thresholds of the Settlement Agreement. Plans were made to meet with the staff Tuesday, June 30, 1998. The Test Validation Committee met on June 30, 1998, and discussed the following: 1. The appropriateness of the use of scaled scores on the SA T-8 test as the metric for assessing LRSD compliance with the loan forgiveness provisions of the Settlement Agreement\nand 2. The need for an independent analysis of LRSD students' test scores to determine compliance or noncompliance with loan forgiveness standard, and who would bear the cost of such an independent analysis. The Test Validation Committee met on September 10, 1998, to review recent correspondence from LRSD and to further discuss issues related to the loan forgiveness provisions of the Settlement Agreement. A follow-up administrative meeting was held on October 13, 1998, to discuss issues related to the test validation process. Participants included Tim Gauger, Assistant Attorney General, Dr. Charity Smith, Lead Planner for Desegregation, and Frank Anthony, Assistant Director for Accountability. A meeting was scheduled with Dr. Les Carnine, LRSD Superintendent and Mr. Ray Simon, ADE Director, regarding Test Validation and loan forgiveness provisions of the Settlement Agreement on May 12, 1999. 52 VII. TEST VALIDATION (Continued) C. Upon completion of test validation procedures by the bias review service or expert, the ADE will adopt and use a validated test as a monitoring instrument. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 (Continued) On June 14, 1999, the State Board of Education was briefed on the status of LRSD's refusal to make principal and interest payments into escrow as required by the loan provisions of the Settlement Agreement and related documents. The Board requested that a draft motion to enforce the Settlement Agreement be prepared and submitted to the Board for review and discussion at the Board's next regularly scheduled meeting. On July 12, 1999, the State Board of Education authorized the fil ing of a motion to compel LRSD to make interest and principal payments into escrow pursuant to the loan provisions of the Settlement Agreement. The State Board of Education instructed the Attorney General's Office to file a motion by March 1, 2000 if a determination is made that the LRSD is not in compliance with Section 6 B of the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement regarding the establishment and funding of the escrow account in the loan provision section. On May 8, 2000, the Assistant Director of Accountability was directed by the Director of Education to contact Harcourt Brace Educational Measurement Company about the possibility of conducting a research study on the standardized test composite scores from 1990 through 1999 of LRSD (excluding special education students). The Test Selection Committee met on May 23, 2000, at the ADE and discussed ways to measure LRSD's progress toward meeting the loan forgiveness threshold of the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement. An update on the progress with Harcourt Brace was made at that time. Harcourt Brace has been contacted about conducting an initial research report on LRSD's progress toward meeting the loan forgiveness threshold of the settlement agreement. This report will review all composite scores since 1990 of LRSD's black and white students (excluding special education students). The purpose of the report is to determine if at any time from Spring 1990 to Fall 1999 did the composite scores of LRSD's black students (excluding special education students) reach 90% or greater of the composite scores of LRSD's white students (excluding special education students) on the State mandated norm-referenced test. Company representatives will advise the ADE of the cost and feasibility of producing the report by May 31 , 2000. If the report indicates that LRSD has not meet the loan forgiveness requirements of the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement, an additional analysis of the Fall 2000 standardized tests results will be made. 5 3 VII. TEST VALIDATION (Continued) C. Upon completion of test validation procedures by the bias review service or expert, the ADE will adopt and use a validated test as a monitoring instrument. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 (Continued) Harcourt Brace indicated that they would be able to provide the data, but indicated that analysis of the data should be done by an independent consultant. The search for an independent consultant has been undertaken. On February 12, 2001, the ADE Director provided the State Board of Education with a special update on desegregation activities. 54 VIII. IN-SERVICE TRAINING A. Through an interactive process with representatives of desegregating districts, identify in-service training needs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 The information for this item is detailed under Section VIII.D. of this report. B. Develop in-service training programs to address in-service training needs of desegregating districts. C. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 The information for this item is detailed under Section VIII.D. of this report. Implement in-service training programs to address in-service training needs of desegregating districts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 The information for this item is detailed under Section VIII.D. of this report. D. Evaluate in-service training programs developed and executed to address in-service training needs of desegregating districts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 In April 1995, the Tri-District Staff Development Committee were provided an overview of the Scott Alternative Learning Center's operation and met with students and staff. In May 1995, the Districts were in the process of self-assessment and planning for fall staff development. 55 VIII. IN-SERVICE TRAINING (Continued) D. Evaluate in-service training programs developed and executed to address in-service training needs of desegregating districts. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 (Continued) The Districts worked on staff development to be incorporated into their fall 95/96 preschool calendars. The uniqueness of each district's needs and their schools was considered in the planning by utilizing the results of needs assessment instruments. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on September 13, 1995 to plan for an ADE administered Classroom Management grant. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on September 19, 1995 to finalize the Classroom Management grant proposal. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on October 24, 1995 to discuss program and staff development evaluation models that might be available to the Districts. On November 15, 1995, the ADE met with an ODM representative to discuss the progress the ADE had made in attaining the objectives outlined in the Implementation Plan with regard to inservice training. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on November 21, 1995 to discuss upcoming training events and various NLR programs that focus on non-academic needs. A new program consisting of placing a graduate student of social work, a field supervisor, and a DHS worker in the district at no cost to the district was discussed. Additionally, NLR provided an overview of their program for credit deficient students. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on December 19, 1995 to discuss information dealing with ways to broaden the perspective of multicultural education. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on January 17, 1996 to discuss proposed changes in the standards regarding media centers and NLRSD's staff development strategic planning committee. The committee reviewed a video on diversity produced by the Arkansas Elementary Principals Association. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on February 21, 1996 to discuss the implications of budget cuts on staff development programs and PCSSD's request for unitary status for their staff development program. They also discussed the need for computer literacy, technology training, and acquisition of hardware and software by the Districts. 56 VIII. IN-SERVICE TRAINING (Continued) D. Evaluate in-service training programs developed and executed to address in-service training needs of desegregating districts. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 (Continued) The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on March 27, 1996 to discuss available resources concerning sexual harassment. ADE regulations in relation to staff members attending professional association conferences as well as the district staff development and potential sites for training seminars were also discussed. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on April 30, 1996 to discuss the reconfiguring of Jacksonville Junior High, PCSSD professional development schedules, and APSCN on-line time lines. A tour of the Washington Magnet school was also conducted. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee received a demonstration of UALR's Baum Decision Support Center's capabilities regarding consensus and planning on May 29, 1996. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee did not meet during September, October, and November 1996 because of scheduling conflicts and the extended medical leave of the ADE liaison. On December 18, 1996, the Tri-District Staff Development Committee met to discuss the linkage between the Implementation Plan, staff development, and student achievement. On January 21, 1997, the Tri-District Staff Development Committee met and discussed sharing middle school strategies and the Districts' training catalogs. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on February 25, 1997 to discuss their current staff development programs and an overview of the relationship of their current programs with their desegregation plans. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on March 26, 1997 to observe the Great Expectations Program. The principal and mentor teachers provided information on the components and philosophy of the program, and students demonstrated selected components. The PCSSD may adopt the program for selected schools in their district. The committee was provided with an update of pertinent information on resources available to the Districts. The committee decided that the ADE liaison to the committee would gather documentation of completed staff development directly from the Districts, instead of the Districts providing this information at the committee meetings. 57 VIII. IN-SERVICE TRAINING (Continued) D. Evaluate in-service training programs developed and executed to address in-service training needs of desegregating districts. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 (Continued) New information on teacher licensure and rules and regulations was shared with the Tri-District Staff Development Committee at their April 1997 meeting. A report was presented to the committee on information from the Arkansas Council for Social Studies about an October 1997 meeting on integrated curriculum. The Districts will provide principal retreats this summer as a part of their staff development. The PCSSD will sponsor a renowned speaker on strategies to serve at risk youth in August 1997 in which the committee is invited to attend. The LRSD shared survey results from a pilot administration to four teachers in each district. The survey found the sample to be strong in content but lacking in context and process. Plans to address these needs will be developed. In another survey to certified and non-certified LRSD staff, stress management was the major concern. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on May 14, 1997 to participate in a teleconference with the five 1996 awardees of the National Awards Program for Model for Professional Development. The PCSSD shared their summer and fall staff development catalog with the members. The committee will reconvene in the fall of the 97/98 school year. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee is scheduled to meet on September 30, 1997 to discuss collaborative actions for FY 97/98. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on September 30, 1997 to discuss their staff development for the 1997 /1998 school year. The PCSSD had a pre-school in-service for the faculty, and the LRSD conducted a Principals Academy with an expert on the math and science initiative which lasted several days. The NLRSD is providing staff development by satellite. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on October 28, 1997. The LRSD and NLRSD shared some of their staff development course offerings with the committee, and the PCSSD discussed ways of optimizing opportunities for staff development with specific emphasis on the junior high school conflict resolution training. In November 1997, the Lead Planner provided technical assistance to Central High School staff regarding data disaggregation, test score analysis and ways to improve student achievement. 58 VIII. IN-SERVICE TRAINING (Continued) D. Evaluate in-service training programs developed and executed to address in-service training needs of desegregating districts. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 (Continued) The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on November 25, 1997 to discuss the Standards for Staff Development. The LRSD will begin providing technology training to their employees in January by utilizing business teachers. Additionally, they discussed a collaborative venture of the Districts involving a workshop from Chicago on a program called \"Great Expectations.\" The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on December 16, 1997 to discuss technology plans, strategies for obtaining information currently being provided to the education cooperatives, scheduling of Arkansas history, and the development of a comprehensive list of locations available for staff development. Members agreed to bring information on available locations to the January meeting and have set a tentative completion date for the project of May 1998. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on January 27, 1998 to share information for developing a comprehensive list of locations available for staff development. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on February 24, 1998 to work on the development of the list of locations available for staff development. The committee also discussed the meeting on student achievement sponsored by the ADE for the Districts, principals' staff development in the Districts and emphasis on improving achievement as reflected on the SAT-9. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on March 19, 1998 to discuss the math and science grant received by the LRSD, the Districts' inservice calendars for August, TESA and Student-Team Learning trainers, and team building for staff. The ADE Deputy Director is scheduled to discuss ways the committee can strengthen their relationship with the regional cooperatives at their May meeting. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on April 27, 1998 to discuss their proposal for involvement with the regional cooperatives. The ADE Deputy Director is scheduled to discuss committee's concerns regarding their relationship with the regional cooperatives at their next meeting. 59 VIII. IN-SERVICE TRAINING (Continued) D. Evaluate in-service training programs developed and executed to address in-service training needs of desegregating districts. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31, 2002 (Continued) The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met Thursday, May 21 , 1998, in the Instructional Resources Center at Little Rock School District. Dr. Woodrow Cummins, ADE Deputy Director, joined the group to discuss ways to develop a closer connection with the Education Service Cooperatives. He also discussed other issues concerning Tri-District Staff Development. Tentative plans were made to meet with the Teacher Center Coordinators at their next regular meeting. The next Central Office meeting will be at 9:00 a.m., Thursday, September 29, 1998, in the PCSSD. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee will attend the Educational Cooperative Teacher Center Coordinators' meeting September 1, 1998, in the ADE auditorium. The next regular meeting of the committee is tentatively set for 9:00 a.m., Thursday, September 29, 1998, in the PCSSD Central Office. The Tri-County Staff Development Committee met Monday, August 24, 1998, at PCSSD central office with four members present: Marion Woods, LRSD\nDoug Ask and Mary McClendon, PCSSD\nand Betty Gale Davis, ADE. Topics of discussion included the September 1 meeting scheduled with the regional cooperatives' teacher center coordinators\nthe staff development task force on which Marion Woods is serving\nthe property tax issue\nand various mathematics and reading programs being used in the districts. The committee met Tuesday, September 1, 1998, with the Teacher Center Coordinators, at which time Dr. Woody Cummins presented. Six Tri-District Staff Development Committee members were present: Marion Woods, LRSD\nDoug Ask and Mary McClendon, PCSSD\nDana Chadwick and Estelle Crawford, NLRSD\nBetty Gale Davis, ADE. The next committee meeting will be 9:00 a.m., Thursday, September 24, 1998, at the Little Rock District Instructional Resources Center. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met Thursday, September 24, 1998, at the Instructional Resources Center, Little Rock, with five present: Marion Woods and Dr. Bonnie Lesley, LRSD\nDoug Ask, PCSSD\nDana Chadwick, NLRSD\nand Dr. Betty Gale Davis, ADE. Topics of discussion included the meeting with the regional cooperatives' teacher center coordinators\nthe staff development task force on which Marion Woods is serving and the NSCI training\ntraining provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)\ntraining provided by Casio\nand the proposal of a Principals Academy. 60 VIII. IN-SERVICE TRAINING (Continued) D. Evaluate in-service training programs developed and executed to address in-service training needs of desegregating districts. (Continued) 2. Actual as of January 31 , 2002 (Continued) Doug Ask will serve as representative to the October 6, 1998 meeting of the Teacher Center Coordinators. He will submit to Donna Harris, president of the group, a request for one other member of the Tri-County Committee (Dana Chadwick) to attend the meeting. Representatives for future meetings (second Tuesday of each month) will be: Marion Woods, November\nMary McClendon, December\nDana Chadwick, January. The next committee meeting will be 9:00 a.m., Tuesday, October 13, 1998, at the North Little Rock School District Central Office. The Tri-District Staff Development Committee met on Tuesday, October 13, 1998, in the NLRSD Administration Building. Doug Ask represented the committee at the Teacher Center Coordinators' meeting in Fayetteville, October 6. He shared w\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"luu_batonrougeboycott","title":"The Baton Rouge bus boycott of 1953 : a recaptured past","collection_id":null,"collection_title":null,"dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Louisiana, East Baton Rouge Parish, 30.53824, -91.09562","United States, Louisiana, East Baton Rouge Parish, Baton Rouge, 30.44332, -91.18747"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2002"],"dcterms_description":["Online exhibit about the 1953 bus boycott in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Baton Rouge was the site of the first successful bus boycott of the 1950s. This event became a blueprint for the more publicized boycott to take place two years later in Montgomery, Alabama, and it set the stage for desegregation in the Deep South.","The exhibit includes photographs, an historical timeline, and the personal recollections of some of the major figures behind the Baton Rouge bus boycott.","The Civil Rights Digital Library received support from a National Leadership Grant for Libraries awarded to the University of Georgia by the Institute of Museum and Library Services for the aggregation and enhancement of partner metadata."],"dc_format":null,"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["Boycotts--Louisiana--Baton Rouge","Buses--Louisiana--Baton Rouge","Segregation in transportation--Louisiana--Baton Rouge","Race discrimination--Louisiana--Baton Rouge","Segregation--Louisiana--Baton Rouge","Civil rights--Louisiana--Baton Rouge","African Americans--Civil rights--Louisiana--Baton Rouge","African Americans--Louisiana--Baton Rouge","Civil rights movements--Louisiana--Baton Rouge","Civil rights demonstrations--Louisiana--Baton Rouge","African American civil rights workers--Louisiana--Baton Rouge","Civil rights workers--Louisiana--Baton Rouge","Baton Rouge (La.)--Race relations--History--20th century","Direct action--Louisiana--Baton Rouge","Race relations"],"dcterms_title":["The Baton Rouge bus boycott of 1953 : a recaptured past"],"dcterms_type":["InteractiveResource"],"dcterms_provenance":["LSU Libraries. Special Collections"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["https://www.lib.lsu.edu/sites/all/files/sc/exhibits/e-exhibits/boycott/index.html"],"dcterms_temporal":["1953"],"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["instructional materials","online exhibitions","oral histories (literary works)","transcripts","timelines (chronologies)","photographs","black-and-white photographs"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null}],"pages":{"current_page":352,"next_page":353,"prev_page":351,"total_pages":6797,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":4212,"total_count":81557,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"educator_resource_mediums_sms","items":[{"value":"lesson plans","hits":319},{"value":"teaching guides","hits":53},{"value":"timelines (chronologies)","hits":43},{"value":"online exhibitions","hits":38},{"value":"bibliographies","hits":15},{"value":"study guides","hits":11},{"value":"annotated bibliographies","hits":9},{"value":"learning modules","hits":6},{"value":"worksheets","hits":6},{"value":"slide shows","hits":4},{"value":"quizzes","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":40428},{"value":"StillImage","hits":35298},{"value":"MovingImage","hits":4529},{"value":"Sound","hits":3226},{"value":"Collection","hits":41},{"value":"InteractiveResource","hits":25}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"Peppler, Jim","hits":4965},{"value":"Phay, John E.","hits":4712},{"value":"University of Mississippi. Bureau of Educational Research","hits":4707},{"value":"Baldowski, Clifford H., 1917-1999","hits":2599},{"value":"Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission","hits":2255},{"value":"Thurmond, Strom, 1902-2003","hits":2077},{"value":"WSB-TV (Television station : Atlanta, Ga.)","hits":1475},{"value":"Newman, I. DeQuincey (Isaiah DeQuincey), 1911-1985","hits":1003},{"value":"The State Media Company (Columbia, S.C.)","hits":926},{"value":"Atlanta Journal-Constitution","hits":844},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":778}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"African Americans--Civil rights","hits":9445},{"value":"Civil rights","hits":8328},{"value":"African Americans","hits":5912},{"value":"Mississippi--Race relations","hits":5750},{"value":"Race relations","hits":5604},{"value":"Education, Secondary","hits":5083},{"value":"Education, Elementary","hits":4729},{"value":"Segregation in education--Mississippi","hits":4727},{"value":"Education--Pictorial works","hits":4707},{"value":"Civil rights demonstrations","hits":4440},{"value":"Civil rights workers","hits":3536}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966--Correspondence","hits":1888},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1815},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1709},{"value":"Baker, Augusta, 1911-1998","hits":1495},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1312},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1071},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":858},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":814},{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":719},{"value":"Mizell, M. Hayes","hits":674},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":626}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"name_authoritative_sms","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":2598},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1915},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1704},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1331},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1070},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":856},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":806},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":625},{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":605},{"value":"Snelling, Paula","hits":580},{"value":"Williams, Hosea, 1926-2000","hits":440}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Nobel Prize","hits":1769},{"value":"Ole Miss Integration","hits":1670},{"value":"Housing Act of 1961","hits":969},{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":853},{"value":"Memphis Sanitation Workers Strike","hits":366},{"value":"Selma-Montgomery March","hits":337},{"value":"Freedom Summer","hits":306},{"value":"Freedom Rides","hits":214},{"value":"Poor People's Campaign","hits":180},{"value":"University of Georgia Integration","hits":173},{"value":"University of Alabama Integration","hits":140}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":17987},{"value":"United States, Georgia, Fulton County, Atlanta, 33.749, -84.38798","hits":5437},{"value":"United States, Alabama, Montgomery County, Montgomery, 32.36681, -86.29997","hits":5151},{"value":"United States, Georgia, 32.75042, -83.50018","hits":4847},{"value":"United States, South Carolina, 34.00043, -81.00009","hits":4599},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":4328},{"value":"United States, Alabama, 32.75041, -86.75026","hits":3948},{"value":"United States, Mississippi, 32.75041, -89.75036","hits":2910},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":2580},{"value":"United States, Tennessee, Shelby County, Memphis, 35.14953, -90.04898","hits":2580},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":2536}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Georgia","hits":12823},{"value":"Alabama","hits":11313},{"value":"Mississippi","hits":10220},{"value":"South Carolina","hits":8493},{"value":"Arkansas","hits":4733},{"value":"Texas","hits":4399},{"value":"Tennessee","hits":3786},{"value":"Florida","hits":2602},{"value":"Ohio","hits":2403},{"value":"North Carolina","hits":1875},{"value":"New York","hits":1840}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1966","hits":10632},{"value":"1963","hits":10287},{"value":"1965","hits":10218},{"value":"1956","hits":9840},{"value":"1955","hits":9619},{"value":"1964","hits":9365},{"value":"1968","hits":9345},{"value":"1962","hits":9247},{"value":"1967","hits":8897},{"value":"1957","hits":8523},{"value":"1961","hits":8282},{"value":"1958","hits":8259},{"value":"1959","hits":8061},{"value":"1960","hits":7948},{"value":"1969","hits":7348},{"value":"1954","hits":7240},{"value":"1950","hits":7118},{"value":"1953","hits":6969},{"value":"1970","hits":6835},{"value":"1971","hits":6425},{"value":"1977","hits":6367},{"value":"1972","hits":6254},{"value":"1952","hits":6162},{"value":"1951","hits":6046},{"value":"1975","hits":5894},{"value":"1976","hits":5863},{"value":"1974","hits":5849},{"value":"1973","hits":5689},{"value":"1979","hits":5416},{"value":"1978","hits":5405},{"value":"1980","hits":5366},{"value":"1995","hits":4885},{"value":"1981","hits":4811},{"value":"1994","hits":4704},{"value":"1948","hits":4597},{"value":"1949","hits":4573},{"value":"1996","hits":4542},{"value":"1982","hits":4417},{"value":"1947","hits":4317},{"value":"1985","hits":4313},{"value":"1998","hits":4281},{"value":"1983","hits":4261},{"value":"1997","hits":4258},{"value":"1984","hits":4152},{"value":"1999","hits":4074},{"value":"1946","hits":4047},{"value":"1945","hits":4018},{"value":"1986","hits":4006},{"value":"1990","hits":3988},{"value":"1943","hits":3900},{"value":"1944","hits":3896},{"value":"2000","hits":3894},{"value":"2001","hits":3876},{"value":"1942","hits":3868},{"value":"1940","hits":3765},{"value":"1941","hits":3758},{"value":"1987","hits":3744},{"value":"2002","hits":3624},{"value":"1991","hits":3553},{"value":"1936","hits":3507},{"value":"1939","hits":3501},{"value":"1992","hits":3500},{"value":"2003","hits":3489},{"value":"1993","hits":3478},{"value":"1938","hits":3466},{"value":"1937","hits":3450},{"value":"1989","hits":3441},{"value":"1930","hits":3378},{"value":"1988","hits":3355},{"value":"1935","hits":3307},{"value":"1933","hits":3271},{"value":"1934","hits":3271},{"value":"1932","hits":3255},{"value":"1931","hits":3240},{"value":"2005","hits":3143},{"value":"2004","hits":2995},{"value":"2006","hits":2860},{"value":"1929","hits":2790},{"value":"1928","hits":2272},{"value":"1921","hits":2124},{"value":"1925","hits":2040},{"value":"1927","hits":2026},{"value":"1924","hits":2012},{"value":"2016","hits":2011},{"value":"1926","hits":2010},{"value":"1920","hits":1976},{"value":"1923","hits":1955},{"value":"1922","hits":1929},{"value":"2007","hits":1715},{"value":"2008","hits":1664},{"value":"2011","hits":1661},{"value":"2009","hits":1624},{"value":"2019","hits":1623},{"value":"2015","hits":1613},{"value":"2013","hits":1604},{"value":"2010","hits":1601},{"value":"2014","hits":1567},{"value":"2012","hits":1553},{"value":"1919","hits":1533},{"value":"1918","hits":1531}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"0193","max":"2035","count":506439,"missing":56},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"photographs","hits":10710},{"value":"correspondence","hits":9628},{"value":"black-and-white photographs","hits":7678},{"value":"negatives (photographs)","hits":7513},{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":4462},{"value":"letters (correspondence)","hits":3623},{"value":"oral histories (literary works)","hits":3607},{"value":"black-and-white negatives","hits":2771},{"value":"editorial cartoons","hits":2620},{"value":"newspapers","hits":1955},{"value":"manuscripts (documents)","hits":1692}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/","hits":41201},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":17721},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/UND/1.0/","hits":8830},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/","hits":7090},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/","hits":2186},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/","hits":1778},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-CR/1.0/","hits":1115},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","hits":145},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/","hits":60},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-RUU/1.0/","hits":51},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","hits":27}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Jim Peppler Southern Courier Photograph Collection","hits":4956},{"value":"John E. Phay Collection ","hits":4706},{"value":"John J. Herrera Papers","hits":3288},{"value":"Baldy Editorial Cartoons, 1946-1982, 1997: Clifford H. Baldowski Editorial Cartoons at the Richard B. Russell Library.","hits":2607},{"value":"Sovereignty Commission Online","hits":2335},{"value":"Strom Thurmond Collection, Mss 100","hits":2068},{"value":"Alabama Media Group Collection","hits":2067},{"value":"Black Trailblazers, Leaders, Activists, and Intellectuals in Cleveland","hits":2033},{"value":"Rosa Parks Papers","hits":1948},{"value":"Isaiah DeQuincey Newman, (1911-1985), Papers, 1929-2003","hits":1904},{"value":"Lillian Eugenia Smith Papers (circa 1920-1980)","hits":1887}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"John Davis Williams Library. Department of Archives and Special Collections","hits":8885},{"value":"Alabama. Department of Archives and History","hits":8153},{"value":"South Caroliniana Library","hits":4251},{"value":"Atlanta University Center Robert W. Woodruff Library","hits":4102},{"value":"University of North Texas. Libraries","hits":3854},{"value":"University of South Carolina. Libraries","hits":3438},{"value":"Hargrett Library","hits":3292},{"value":"Richard B. Russell Library for Political Research and Studies","hits":2874},{"value":"Mississippi. Department of Archives and History","hits":2825},{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":2785},{"value":"Rhodes College","hits":2264}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":81102},{"value":"Collection","hits":455}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":81360},{"value":"true","hits":197}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}