{"response":{"docs":[{"id":"nge_ngen_city-of-rome-v-united-states-1980","title":"City of Rome v. United States (1980)","collection_id":"nge_ngen","collection_title":"New Georgia Encyclopedia","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Georgia, 32.75042, -83.50018"],"dcterms_creator":["Coenen, Dan T., 1952-"],"dc_date":["2004-10-04"],"dcterms_description":["Encyclopedia article about the case of City of Rome v. United States (1980). Race-based discrimination with respect to voting has pervaded American history, and the U.S. Congress aggressively attacked this wrong by adopting the Voting Rights Act of 1965. At issue in the City of Rome case was the most controversial provision of the Voting Rights Act, which requires federal Justice Department approval of any change in any voting practice put in place by a locale marked by a history of discrimination if that change has either \"the purpose [or] . . . the effect of denying or abridging the right to vote on account of race or color.\""],"dc_format":["text/html"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":["Forms part of the New Georgia Encyclopedia."],"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Forms part of the New Georgia Encyclopedia."],"dcterms_subject":["Judgments--United States","Race discrimination--Law and legislation--United States"],"dcterms_title":["City of Rome v. United States (1980)"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["New Georgia Encyclopedia (Project)"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["https://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/government-politics/city-of-rome-v-united-states-1980/"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":["Cite as: \"City of Rome v. United States (1980),\" New Georgia Encyclopedia. Retrieved [date]: http://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org."],"dlg_local_right":["If you wish to use content from the NGE site for commercial use, publication, or any purpose other than fair use as defined by law, you must request and receive written permission from the NGE. Such requests may be directed to: Permissions/NGE, University of Georgia Press, 330 Research Drive, Athens, GA 30602."],"dcterms_medium":["articles"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"nge_ngen_heart-of-atlanta-motel-v-united-states-1964","title":"Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (1964)","collection_id":"nge_ngen","collection_title":"New Georgia Encyclopedia","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Georgia, Fulton County, Atlanta, 33.749, -84.38798"],"dcterms_creator":["Coenen, Dan T."],"dc_date":["2004-10-04"],"dcterms_description":["Encyclopedia article about the case Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (1964) which resulted in the Supreme Court upholding the public accommodations provisions of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, outlawing racial discrimination by many private service providers, including hotels, motels, and restaurants selling food that had moved across state lines. None of Congress's enumerated powers unequivocally supported enactment of the \"public accommodations\" feature of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and challengers protested the legislation as impinging on states prerogatives to regulate local matters without federal interference. The Supreme Court upheld the antidiscrimination provisions of the 1964 Civil Rights Act were a proper exercise of Congress's power to regulate interstate commerce, in effect reasoning that race discrimination by even very localized businesses had negative effects on the interstate movement of people and products that allowed Congress to remove these impediments to commerce whether or not its true motives centered on racism.","The Civil Rights Digital Library received support from a National Leadership Grant for Libraries awarded to the University of Georgia by the Institute of Museum and Library Services for the aggregation and enhancement of partner metadata.","GSE identifier: SS8H11"],"dc_format":null,"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":null,"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":["Forms part of the New Georgia Encyclopedia."],"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Forms part of the New Georgia Encyclopedia."],"dcterms_subject":["Discrimination in public accommodations--Law and legislation--United States--Cases","United States. Civil Rights Act of 1964","Federal-state controversies--Georgia","Heart of Atlanta Motel--Trials, litigation, etc."],"dcterms_title":["Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (1964)"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["New Georgia Encyclopedia (Project)"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["https://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/government-politics/heart-of-atlanta-motel-v-united-states-1964/"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":["If you wish to use content from the NGE site for commercial use, publication, or any purpose other than fair use as defined by law, you must request and receive written permission from the NGE. Such requests may be directed to: Permissions/NGE, University of Georgia Press, 330 Research Drive, Athens, GA 30602."],"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":["Cite as: \"Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (1964),\" New Georgia Encyclopedia. Retrieved [date]: http://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org."],"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["articles"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_130","title":"Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2004-10"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Little Rock (Ark.). Office of Desegregation Monitoring","School integration--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Project managers--Implements"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/130"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nLittle Rock School District, plaintiff vs. Pulaski County Special School District, defendant\nArkansas DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 4 STATE CAPITOL MAU  LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 -1071  (501) 682-4475  http://arkedu.state.ar.us Ot+vbu :lOOL( September 27, 2.004 Dr. Kenneth James, Director of Education Mr. M. Samuel Jones, III Mr. Christopher Heller Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 200 West Capitol, Suite 2000 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 C, Mr. John W. Walker Mr. Stephen W. Jones ~ m C\u0026gt; John Walker, P.A. Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones = 0 m CJ 1723 Broadway 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 C\u0026gt; c::, -f \u0026gt;\"Tl :::! \"Tl ~ Little Rock, AR 72201 Little Rock, AR 72201 o- :z:~ 00 ~o C\u0026gt; \"Tl ~ Mr. Mark Burnette Office of Desegregation Monitoring :z: c::::, ::j c::::, c::, - Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, One Union National Plaza ~ Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 :z C\u0026gt; P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72201 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 RE: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. U.S. District Court No. 4:82-CV-866 Dear Gentlemen: Per an agreement with the Attorney General's Office, I am filing the Ar-~ v Department of Education's Project Management Tool for the month of ~\nnibeP 2004 in the above-referenced case. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. 1/Jti- General Counsel Arkansas Department of Education SS:law cc: Mark Hagemeier :a m -m0 m\u0026lt; C STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION: Chair - JoNell Caldwell, Little Rock  Vice Chair- Jeanna Westmoreland, Arkadelphia Members: Sherry Burrow, Jonesboro  Shelby Hillman, Carlisle  Calvin King, Marianna  Randy Lawson, Bentonville MaryJane Rebick, Little Rock  Diane Tatum, Pine Bluff  Naccaman Williams, Johnson An Equal Opportunity Employer UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of the ADE's Project Management Tool for October 2004. Respectfully Submitted, General Counsel, Arkansas Department of Education #4 Capitol Mall, Room 404-A Little Rock, AR 72201 501-682-4227 ., CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Scott Smith, certify that on October '2'1\"~004, I caused the foregoing document to be served by depositing a copy in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to each of the following: Mr. M. Samuel Jones, III Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 200 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the AD E's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. - IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Based on the information available at September 30, 2004, the ADE calculated the Equalization Funding for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Based on the information available at September 30, 2004, the ADE calculated for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. C. Process and distribute State MFPA. 1 . Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 On September 30, 2004, distributions of State Foundation Funding for FY 04/05 were as follows: LRSD - $11 ,833,216 NLRSD - $6,055,302 PCSSD - $10,864,038 The allotments of State Foundation FundinQ calculated for FY 04/05 at September 30, 2004, subject to periodic adjustments, were as follows: LRSD - $65,082,694 NLRSD - $33,304, 168 PCSSD - $59,752,214 D. Determine the number of Magnet students residing in each District and attending a Magnet School. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at September 30, 2004 for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. 1. Projected Ending Date  Ongoing, as ordered by the Court. 2 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at September 30, 2004 for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. It should be noted that currently the Magnet Review Committee is reporting this information instead of the staff attorney as indicated in the Implementation Plan. F. Calculate state aid due the LRSD based upon the Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at September 30, 2004 for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. G. Process and distribute state aid for Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Distributions for FY 04/05 at September 30, 2004, totaled $2,237,321. Allotment calculated for FY 04/05 was $12,305,271 subject to periodic adjustments. H. Calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school district is entitled. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Calculated for FY 02/03, subject to periodic adjustments. I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, September - June. 3 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Distributions for FY 04/05 at September 30, 2004, were: LRSD - $414,913 NLRSD - $377,155 PCSSD - $1, 158,934 The allotments calculated for FY 04/05 at September 30, 2004, subject to periodic adjustments, were: LRSD - $4,149,129 NLRSD - $3,771,548 PCSSD - $11,589,336 J. Districts submit an estimated Magnet and M-to-M transportation budget to ADE. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, December of each year. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 In September 2002, the Magnet and M-to-M transportation budgets for FY 02/03 were submitted to the ADE by the Districts. K. The Coordinator of School Transportation notifies General Finance to pay districts for the Districts' proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 In September 2004, General Finance was notified to pay the third one-third payment for FY 03/04 to the Districts. In September 2004, General Finance was notified to pay the first one-third payment for FY 04/05 to the Districts. It should be noted that the Transportation Coordinator is currently performing this function instead of Reginald Wilson as indicated in the Implementation Plan. L. ADE pays districts three equal installments of their proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 4 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) L. ADE pays districts three equal installments of their proposed budget. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 In February 2004, General Finance made the second one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 03/04 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At February 2004, the following had been paid for FY 03/04: LRSD - $2,487,682.66 NLRSD - $526,000.00 PCSSD - $1,454,813.26 In September 2004, General Finance made the last one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 03/04 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 2004, the following had been paid for FY 03/04: LRSD - $4\n019,063.00 NLRSD - $772,940.15 PCSSD - $2,478,863.72 In September 2004, General Finance made the first one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 04/05 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 2004, the following had been paid for FY 04/05: LRSD - $1,325,043.67 NLRSD - $275,333.33 PCSSD - $845,221.22 M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. 1 . Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 In August 1997, the ADE transportation coordinator reviewed each district's Magnet and M-to-M transportation costs for FY 96/97. In July 1998, each district was asked to submit an estimated budget for the 98/99 school year. 5 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) In September 1998, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 98/99 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. School districts should receive payment by October 1, 1998 In July 1999, each district submitted an estimated budget for the 99/00 school year. In September 1999, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 99/00 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2000, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 00/01 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2001, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 01/02 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2002, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 02/03 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2003, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 03/04 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2004, paperwork was Qenerated for the first payment in the 04/05 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as stated in Exhibit A of the Implementation Plan. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 In FY 94/95, the State purchased 52 buses at a cost of $1,799,431 which were added to or replaced existing Magnet and M-to-M buses in the Districts. The buses were distributed to the Districts as follows: LRSD - 32\nNLRSD - 6\nand PCSSD -14. The ADE purchased 64 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $2,334,800 in FY 95/96. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 45\nNLRSD - 7\nand PCSSD - 12. 6 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) In May 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $646,400. In July 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $624,879. In July 1998, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $695,235. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD- 6. Specifications for 16 school buses have been forwarded to state purchasing for bidding in January, 1999 for delivery in July, 1999. The ADE accepted a bid on 16 buses for the Magnet and M/M transportation program. The buses will be delivered after July 1, 1999 and before August 1, 1999. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nPCSSD - 6. In July 1999, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $718,355. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD- 6. In July 2000, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $724,165. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD- 6. The bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was let by State Purchasing on February 22, 2001. The contract was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include two type C 47 passenger buses and fourteen type C 65 passenger buses. Prices on these units are $43,426.00 each on the 47 passenger buses, and $44,289.00 each on the 65 passenger buses. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 2 of the 47 passenger and 4 of the 65 passenger buses. On August 2, 2001, the ADE took possession of 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $706,898. In June 2002, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include five 47 passenger buses for $42, 155.00 each, ten 65 passenger buses for $43,850.00 each, and one 47 passenger bus with a wheelchair lift for $46,952.00. The total amount was $696,227. 7 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. 0. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) In August of 2002, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $696,227. Specifications for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M school buses have been forwarded to State Purchasing for bidding. Bids will be opened on May 12, 2003. The buses will have a required delivery date after July 1, 2003 and before August 8, 2003. In June 2003, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include 5 - 47 passenger buses for $47,052.00 each, and 11 - 65 passenger buses for $48,895.00 each. The total amount was $773,105. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 5 of the 47 passenger and 1 of the 65 passenger buses. In June 2004, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The price for the buses was $49,380 each for a total cost of $790,080. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8, NLRSD - 2, and PCSSD - 6. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to LRSD as required by page 23 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 and January 1, of each school year through January 1, 1999. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Obligation fulfilled in FY 96/97. P. Process and distribute additional payments in lieu of formula to LRSD as required by page 24 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. 8 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) Q. Process and distribute payments to PCSSD as required by Page 28 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1994. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Final payment was distributed July 1994. R. Upon loan request by LRSD accompanied by a promissory note, the ADE makes loans to LRSD. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing through July 1, 1999. See Settlement Agreement page 24. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 The LRSD received $3,000,000 on September 10, 1998. As of this reporting date, the LRSD has received $20,000,000 in loan proceeds. S. Process and distribute payments in lieu of formula to PCSSD required by page 29 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. T. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to NLRSD as required by page 31 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 of each school year through June 30, 1996. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. 9 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) u. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 97 /98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 00/01. Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 01 /02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 04/05. V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. 1. Projected Ending Date Not applicable. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 99/00. 10 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring.(Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 00/01. Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01 /02 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 04/05. 11 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. 1. Projected Ending Date January 15, 1995 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 In May 1995, monitors completed the unannounced visits of schools in Pulaski County. The monitoring process involved a qualitative process of document reviews, interviews, and observations. The monitoring focused on progress made since the announced monitoring visits. In June 1995, monitoring data from unannounced visits was included in the July Semiannual Report. Twenty-five per cent of all classrooms were visited, and all of the schools in Pulaski County were monitored. All principals were interviewed to determine any additional progress since the announced visits. The July 1995 Monitoring Report was reviewed by the ADE administrative team, the Arkansas State Board of Education, and the Districts and filed with the Court. The report was formatted in accordance with the Allen Letter. In October 1995, a common terminology was developed by principals from the Districts and the Lead Planning and Desegregation staff to facilitate the monitoring process. The announced monitoring visits began on November 14, 1995 and were completed on January 26, 1996. Copies of the preliminary Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the ADE administrative team and the State Board of Education in January 1996. A report on the current status of the Cycle 5 schools in the ECOE process and their school improvement plans was filed with the Court on February 1, 1996. The unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1996 and ended on May 10, 1996. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and the data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Districts provided data on enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Districts and the ADE Desegregation Monitoring staff developed a definition for instructional programs. 12 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996 with copies distributed to the parties. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996 and concluded in December 1996. In January 1997, presentations were made to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties to review the draft Semiannual Monitoring Report. The monitoring instrument and process were evaluated for their usefulness in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on achievement disparities. In February 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was filed. Unannounced monitoring .visits began on February 3, 1997 and concluded in May 1997. In March 1997, letters were sent to the Districts regarding data requirements for the July 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and the additional discipline data element that was requested by the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Desegregation data collection workshops were conducted in the Districts from March 28, 1997 to April 7, 1997. A meeting was conducted on April 3, 1997 to finalize plans for the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report. Onsite visits were made to Cycle 1 schools who did not submit accurate and timely data on discipline, M-to-M transfers, and policy. The July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were finalized in June 1997. In July 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were filed with the court, and the ADE sponsored a School Improvement Conference. On July 10, 1997, copies of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were made available to the Districts for their review prior to filing it with the Court. In August 1997, procedures and schedules were organized for the monitoring of the Cycle 2 schools in FY 97/98. 13 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) A Desegregation Monitoring and School Improvement Workshop for the Districts was held on September 10, 1997 to discuss monitoring expectations, instruments, data collection and school improvement visits. On October 9, 1997, a planning meeting was held with the desegregation monitoring staff to discuss deadlines, responsibilities, and strategic planning issues regarding the Semiannual Monitoring Report. Reminder letters were sent to the Cycle 2 principals outlining the data collection deadlines and availability of technical assistance. In October and November 1997, technical assistance visits were conducted, and announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 2 schools were completed. In December 1997 and January 1998, technical assistance visits were conducted regarding team visits, technical review recommendations, and consensus building. Copies of the infusion document and perceptual surveys were provided to schools in the ECOE process. The February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report was submitted for review and approval to the State Board of Education, the Director, the Administrative Team, the Attorney General's Office, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process, external team visits and finalizing school improvement plans. On February 18, 1998, the representatives of all parties met to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. Additional meetings will be scheduled. Unannounced monitoring visits were conducted in March 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process and external team visits. In April 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were conducted, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. 14 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) In May 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. On May 18, 1998, the Court granted the ADE relief from its obligation to file the July 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report to develop proposed modifications to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. In June 1998, monitoring information previously submitted by the districts in the Spring of 1998 was reviewed and prepared for historical files and presentation to the Arkansas State Board. Also, in June the following occurred: a) The Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed, b) the Semiannual Monitoring COE Data Report was completed, c) progress reports were submitted from previous cycles, and d.) staff development on assessment (SAT-9) and curriculum alignment was conducted with three supervisors. In July, the Lead Planner provided the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee with (1) a review of the court Order relieving ADE of its obligation to file a July Semiannual Monitoring Report, and (2) an update of ADE's progress toward work with the parties and ODM to develop proposed revisions to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. The Committee encouraged ODM, the parties and the ADE to continue to work toward revision of the monitoring and reporting process. In August 1998, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Attorney General, the Assistant Director for Accountability and the Education Lead Planner updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and proposed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. In September 1998, tentative monitoring dates were established and they will be finalized once proposed revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring Plan are finalized and approved. In September/October 1998, progress was being made on the proposed revisions to the monitoring process by committee representatives of all the Parties in the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement. While the revised monitoring plan is finalized and approved, the ADE monitoring staff will continue to provide technical assistance to schools upon request. 15 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) In December 1998, requests were received from schools in PCSSD regarding test score analysis and staff Development. Oak Grove is scheduled for January 21, 1999 and Lawson Elementary is also tentatively scheduled in January. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD has been rescheduled for April 2000. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD was conducted on May 5, 2000 and May 9, 2000 respectively. Staff development regarding classroom management was provided to the Franklin Elementary School in LRSD on November 8, 2000. Staff development regarding ways to improve academic achievement was presented to College Station Elementary in PCSSD on November 22, 2000. On November 1, 2000, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Director for Accountability updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and discussed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for February 27, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group meeting that was scheduled for February 27 had to be postponed. It will be rescheduled as soon as possible. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting is scheduled for June 27, 2001. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from June 27. It will take place on July 26, 2001 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 16 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On July 26, 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 11, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. On October 11, 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the ADE's intent to take a proactive role in Desegregation Monitoring. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 10, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting that was scheduled for January 10 was postponed. It has been rescheduled for February 14, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On February 12, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 11, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On April 11, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 11, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. 17 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On July 18, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, talked about section XV in the Project Management Tool (PMT) on Standardized Test Selection to Determine Loan Forgiveness. She said that the goal has been completed, and no additional reporting is required for section XV. Mr. Morris discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. He handed out a Court Order from May 9, 2002, which contained comments from U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr., about hearings on the LRSD request for unitary status. Mr. Morris also handed out a document from the Secretary of Education about the No Child Left Behind Act. There was discussion about how this could have an affect on Desegregation issues. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 10, 2002 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from October 10. It will take place on October 29, 2002 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. On October 29, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Meetings with the parties to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan will be postponed by request of the school districts in Pulaski County. Additional meetings could be scheduled after the Desegregation ruling is finalized. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 9, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On January 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. No Child Left Behind and the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD were discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from April 10. It will take place on April 24, 2003 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 18 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On April 24, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Laws passed by the legislature need to be checked to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Ray Lumpkin was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he left, we will discuss the legislation with Clearence Lovell. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On August 28, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The LRSD has been instructed to submit evidence showing progress in reducing disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. This is supposed to be done by March of 2004, so that the LRSD can achieve unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 9, 2003 at the ADE. On October 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 8, 2004 at the ADE. On October 16, 2003, ADE staff met with the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee at the State Capitol. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, and Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, presented the Chronology of activity by the ADE in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan for the Desegregation Settlement Agreement. They also discussed the role of the ADE Desegregation Monitoring Section. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, reported on legal issues relating to the Pulaski County Desegregation Case. Ann Marshall shared a history of activities by ODM, and their view of the activity of the school districts in Pulaski County. John Kunkel discussed Desegregation funding by the ADE. 19 111. A PETITION FOR ELECTION FOR LRSD WILL BE SUPPORTED SHOULD A MILLAGE BE REQUIRED A. Monitor court pleadings to determine if LRSD has petitioned the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Ongoing. All Court pleadings are monitored monthly. B. Draft and file appropriate pleadings if LRSD petitions the Court for a special election. 1 . Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 To date, no action has been taken by the LRSD. 20 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION A. Using a collaborative approach, immediately identify those laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date December, 1994 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. B. Conduct a review within ADE of existing legislation and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. C. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. Request of the other parties to the Settlement Agreement that they identify laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. D. Submit proposals to the State Board of Education for repeal of those regulations that are confirmed to be impediments to desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. 21 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 A committee within the ADE was formed in May 1995 to review and collect data on existing legislation and regulations identified by the parties as impediments to desegregation. The committee researched the Districts' concerns to determine if any of the rules, regulations, or legislation cited impede desegregation. The legislation cited by the Districts regarding loss funding and worker's compensation were not reviewed because they had already been litigated. In September 1995, the committee reviewed the following statutes, acts, and regulations: Act 113 of 1993\nADE Director's Communication 93-205\nAct 145 of 1989\nADE Director's Memo 91-67\nADE Program Standards Eligibility Criteria for Special Education\nArkansas Codes 6-18-206, 6-20-307, 6-20-319, and 6-17- 1506. In October 1995, the individual reports prepared by committee members in their areas of expertise and the data used to support their conclusions were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. A report was prepared and submitted to the State Board of Education in July 1996. The report concluded that none of the items reviewed impeded desegregation. As of February 3, 1997, no laws or regulations have been determined to impede desegregation efforts. Any new education laws enacted during the Arkansas 81 st Legislative Session will be reviewed at the close of the legislative session to ensure that they do not impede desegregation. In April 1997, copies of all laws passed during the 1997 Regular Session of the 81 st General Assembly were requested from the office of the ADE Liaison to the Legislature for distribution to the Districts for their input and review of possible impediments to their desegregation efforts. In August 1997, a meeting to review the statutes passed in the prior legislative session was scheduled for September 9, 1997. 22 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On September 9, 1997, a meeting was held to discuss the review of the statutes passed in the prior legislative session and new ADE regulations. The Districts will be contacted in writing for their input regarding any new laws or regulations that they feel may impede desegregation. Additionally, the Districts will be asked to review their regulations to ensure that they do not impede their desegregation efforts. The committee will convene on December 1, 1997 to review their findings and finalize their report to the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. In October 1997, the Districts were asked to review new regulations and statutes for impediments to their desegregation efforts, and advise the ADE, in writing, if they feel a regulation or statute may impede their desegregation efforts. In October 1997, the Districts were requested to advise the ADE, in writing, no later than November 1, 1997 of any new law that might impede their desegregation efforts. As of November 12, 1997, no written responses were received from the Districts. The ADE concludes that the Districts do not feel that any new law negatively impacts their desegregation efforts. The committee met on December 1, 1997 to discuss their findings regarding statutes and regulations that may impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. The committee concluded that there were no laws or regulations that impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. It was decided that the committee chair would prepare a report of the committee's findings for the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation is now reviewing proposed bills and regulations, as well as laws that are being signed in, for the current 1999 legislative session. They will continue to do so until the session is over. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation will meet on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The committee met on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The purpose of the meeting was to identify rules and regulations that might impede desegregation, and review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. This is a standing committee that is ongoing and a report will be submitted to the State Board of Education once the process is completed. 23 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) The committee met on May 24, 1999 at the ADE. The committee was asked to review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. The committee determined that Mr. Ray Lumpkin would contact the Pulaski County districts to request written response to any rules, regulations or laws that might impede desegregation. The committee would also collect information and data to prepare a report for the State Board. This will be a standing committee. This data gathering will be ongoing until the final report is given to the State Board. On July 26, 1999, the committee met at the ADE. The committee did not report any laws or regulations that they currently thought would impede desegregation, and are still waiting for a response from the three districts in Pulaski County. The committee met on August 30, 1999 at the ADE to review rules and regulations that might impede desegregation. At that time, there were no laws under review that appeared to impede desegregation. In November, the three districts sent letters to the ADE stating that they have reviewed the laws passed by the 82nd legislative session as well as current rules \u0026amp; regulations and district policies to ensure that they have no ill effect on desegregation efforts. There was some concern from PCSSD concerning a charter school proposal in the Maumelle area. The work of the committee is on-going each month depending on the information that comes before the committee. Any rules, laws or regulations that would impede desegregation will be discussed and reported to the State Board of Education. On October 4, 2000, the ADE presented staff development for assistant superintendents in LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD regarding school laws of Arkansas. The ADE is in the process of forming a committee to review all Rules and Regulations from the ADE and State Laws that might impede desegregation. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will review all new laws that might impede desegregation once the 83rd General Assembly has completed this session. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will meet for the first time on June 11, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. in room 204-A at the ADE. The committee will review all new laws that might impede desegregation that were passed during the 2001 Legislative Session. 24 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations rescheduled the meeting that was planned for June 11, in order to review new regulations proposed to the State Board of Education. The meeting will take place on July 16, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on July 16, 2001 at the ADE. The following Items were discussed: (1) Review of 2001 state laws which appear to impede desegregation. (2) Review of existing ADE regulations which appear to impede desegregation. (3) Report any laws or regulations found to impede desegregation to the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts. The next meeting will take place on August 27, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on August 27, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on September 10, 2001 in Conference Room 204-8 at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on September 10, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on October 24, 2001 in Conference Room 204-8 at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on October 24, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. On December 17, 2001, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation composed letters that will be sent to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. Laws to review include those of the 83rd General Assembly, ADE regulations, and regulations of the Districts. 25 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On January 10, 2002, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to respond by March 8, 2002. On March 5, 2002, A letter was sent from the LRSD which mentioned Act 1748 and Act 1667 passed during the 83rd Legislative Session which may impede desegregation. These laws will be researched to determine if changes need to be made. A letter was sent from the NLRSD on March 19, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation. On April 26, 2002, A letter was sent for the PCSSD to the ADE, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation except the \"deannexation\" legislation which the District opposed before the Senate committee. On October 27, 2003, the ADE sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County asking if there were any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to review laws passed during the 84th Legislative Session, any new ADE rules or regulations, and district policies. 26 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES A. Through a preamble to the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 The preamble was contained in the Implementation Plan filed with the Court on March 15, 1994. B. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Ongoing C. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement by actions taken by ADE in response to monitoring results. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Ongoing D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 27 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 At each regular monthly meeting of the State Board of Education, the Board is provided copies of the most recent Project Management Tool (PMT) and an executive summary of the PMT for their review and approval. Only activities that are in addition to the Board's monthly review of the PMT are detailed below. In May 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the total number of schools visited during the monitoring phase and the data collection process. Suggestions were presented to the State Board of Education on how recommendations could be presented in the monitoring reports. In June 1995, an update on the status of the pending Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the State Board of Education. In July 1995, the July Semiannual Monitoring Report was reviewed by the State Board of Education. On August 14, 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the need to increase minority participation in the teacher scholarship program and provided tentative monitoring dates to facilitate reporting requests by the ADE administrative team and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In September 1995, the State Board of Education was advised of a change in the PMT from a table format to a narrative format. The Board was also briefed about a meeting with the Office of Desegregation Monitoring regarding the PMT. In October 1995, the State Board of Education was updated on monitoring timelines. The Board was also informed of a meeting with the parties regarding a review of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and the monitoring process, and the progress of the test validation study. In November 1995, a report was made to the State Board of Education regarding the monitoring schedule and a meeting with the parties concerning the development of a common terminology for monitoring purposes. In December 1995, the State Board of Education was updated regarding announced monitoring visits. In January 1996, copies of the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the State Board of Education. 28 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) During the months of February 1996 through May 1996, the PMT report was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. In June 1996, the State Board of Education was updated on the status of the bias review study. In July 1996, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the Court, the parties, ODM, the State Board of Education, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In August 1996, the State Board of Education and the ADE administrative team were provided with copies of the test validation study prepared by Dr. Paul Williams. During the months of September 1996 through December 1996, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. On January 13, 1997, a presentation was made to the State Board of Education regarding the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report, and copies of the report and its executive summary were distributed to all Board members. The Project Management Tool and its executive summary were addressed at the February 10, 1997 State Board of Education meeting regarding the AD E's progress in fulfilling their obligations as set forth in the Implementation Plan. ' In March 1997, the State Board of Education was notified that historical information in the PMT had been summarized at the direction of the Assistant Attorney General in order to reduce the size and increase the clarity of the report. The Board was updated on the Pulaski County Desegregation Case and reviewed the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued by the Court on February 18, 1997 in response to the Districts' motion for summary judgment on the issue of state funding for teacher retirement matching contributions. During the months of April 1997 through June 1997, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. The State Board of Education received copies of the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and executive summary at the July Board meeting. 29 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of AD E's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on August 4, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. A special report regarding a historical review of the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement and the ADE's role and monitoring obligations were presented to the State Board of Education on September 8, 1997. Additionally, the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Board for their review. In October 1997, a special draft report regarding disparity in achievement was submitted to the State Board Chairman and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In November 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on November 3, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. In December 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. In January 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and discussed ODM's report on the AD E's monitoring activities and instructed the Director to meet with the parties to discuss revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. In February 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and discussed the February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report. In March 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary and was provided an update regarding proposed revisions to the monitoring process. In April 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In May 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. 30 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) In June 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also reviewed how the ADE would report progress in the PMT concerning revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In July 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also received an update on Test Validation, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee Meeting, and revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In August 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the five discussion points regarding the proposed revisions to the monitoring and reporting process. The Board also reviewed the basic goal of the Minority Recruitment Committee. In September 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed the proposed modifications to the Monitoring plans by reviewing the common core of written response received from the districts. The primary commonalities were (1) Staff Development, (2) Achievement Disparity and (3) Disciplinary Disparity. A meeting of the parties is scheduled to be conducted on Thursday, September 17, 1998. The Board encouraged the Department to identify a deadline for Standardized Test Validation and Test Selection. In October 1998, the Board received the progress report on Proposed Revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring and Reporting Process (see XVIII). The Board also reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In November, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the proposed revisions in the Desegregation monitoring Process and the update on Test validation and Test Selection provisions of the Settlement Agreement. The Board was also notified that the Implementation Plan Working Committee held its quarterly meeting to review progress and identify quarterly priorities. In December, the State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion by the ADE, the LRSD, NLRSD, and the PCSSD, to relieve the Department of its obligation to file a February Semiannual Monitoring Report. The Board was also notified that the Joshua lntervenors filed a motion opposing the joint motion. The Board was informed that the ADE was waiting on a response from Court. 31 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) In January, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion of the ADE, LRSD, PCSSD, and NLRSD for an order relieving the ADE of filing a February 1999 Monitoring Report. The motion was granted subject to the following three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua intervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement. In February, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was informed that the three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua lntervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement had been satisfied. The Joshua lntervenors were invited again to attend the meeting of the parties and they attended on January 13, and January 28, 1999. They are also scheduled to attend on February 17, 1998. The report of progress, a collaborative effort from all parties was presented to court on February 1, 1999. The Board was also informed that additional items were received for inclusion in the revised report, after the deadline for the submission of the progress report and the ADE would: (1) check them for feasibility, and fiscal impact if any, and (2) include the items in future drafts of the report. In March, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received and reviewed the Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Progress Report submitted to Court on February 1, 1999. On April 12, and May 10, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On June 14, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. 32 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On July 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On August 9, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On September 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On October 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was notified that on September 21, 1999 that the Office of Education Lead Planning and Desegregation Monitoring meet before the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee and presented them with the draft version of the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan. The State Board was notified that the plan would be submitted for Board review and approval when finalized. On November 8, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. 33 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On May 8, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 12, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 11, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 9, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 11\n2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 8, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 12, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 12, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 9, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 14, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 11, 2001 , the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. 34 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On July 9, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 13, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 10, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 8, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 19, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 10, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 11, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 11, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the _month of March. On May 13, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 10, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 12, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. 35 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On September 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 18, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 14, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 12, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 9, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 11, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 8, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. 36 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of AD E's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On January 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 10, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 14, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 11, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. 37 VI. REMEDIATION A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 During May 1995, team visits to Cycle 4 schools were conducted, and plans were developed for reviewing the Cycle 5 schools. In June 1995, the current Extended COE packet was reviewed, and enhancements to the Extended COE packet were prepared. In July 1995, year end reports were finalized by the Pulaski County field service specialists, and plans were finalized for reviewing the draft improvement plans of the Cycle 5 schools. In August 1995, Phase I - Cycle 5 school improvement plans were reviewed. Plans were developed for meeting with the Districts to discuss plans for Phase II - Cycle 1 schools of Extended COE, and a school improvement conference was conducted in Hot Springs. The technical review visits for the FY 95/96 year and the documentation process were also discussed. In October 1995, two computer programs, the Effective Schools Planner and the Effective Schools Research Assistant, were ordered for review, and the first draft of a monitoring checklist for Extended COE was developed. Through the Extended COE process, the field service representatives provided technical assistance based on the needs identified within the Districts from the data gathered. In November 1995, ADE personnel discussed and planned for the FY 95/96 monitoring, and onsite visits were conducted to prepare schools for the FY 95/96 team visits. Technical review visits continued in the Districts. In December 1995, announced monitoring and technical assistance visits were conducted in the Districts. At December 31, 1995, approximately 59% of the schools in the Districts had been monitored. Technical review visits were conducted during January 1996. In February 1996, announced monitoring visits and midyear monitoring reports were completed, and the field service specialists prepared for the spring NCA/COE peer team visits. 38 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) In March 1996, unannounced monitoring visits of Cycle 5 schools commenced, and two-day peer team visits of Cycle 5 schools were conducted. Two-day team visit materials, team lists and reports were prepared. Technical assistance was provided to schools in final preparation for team visits and to schools needing any school improvement information. In April and May 1996, the unannounced monitoring visits were completed. The unannounced monitoring forms were reviewed and included in the July monitoring report. The two-day peer team visits were completed, and annual COE monitoring reports were prepared. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits of the Cycle 5 schools were completed, and the data was analyzed. The Districts identified enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996, and copies were distributed to the parties. During August 1996, meetings were held with the Districts to discuss the monitoring requirements. Technical assistance meetings with Cycle 1 schools were planned for 96/97. The Districts were requested to record discipline data in accordance with the Allen Letter. In September 1996, recommendations regarding the ADE monitoring schedule for Cycle 1 schools and content layouts of the semiannual report were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. Training materials were developed and schedules outlined for Cycle 1 schools. In October 1996, technical assistance needs were identified and addressed to prepare each school for their team visits. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996. In December 1996, the announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools were completed, and technical assistance needs were identified from school site visits. In January 1997, the ECOE monitoring section identified technical assistance needs of the Cycle 1 schools, and the data was reviewed when the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, the State Board of Education, and the parties. 39 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) In February 1997, field service specialists prepared for the peer team visits of the Cycle 1 schools. NCA accreditation reports were presented to the NCA Committee, and NCA reports were prepared for presentation at the April NCA meeting in Chicago. From March to May 1997, 111 visits were made to schools or central offices to work with principals, ECOE steering committees, and designated district personnel concerning school improvement planning. A workshop was conducted on Learning Styles for Geyer Springs Elementary School. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 15-17, 1997. The conference included information on the process of continuous school improvement, results of the first five years of COE, connecting the mission with the school improvement plan, and improving academic performance. Technical assistance needs were evaluated for the FY 97/98 school year in August 1997. From October 1997 to February 1998, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives. Technical assistance was provided to the Districts through meetings with the ECOE steering committees, assistance in analyzing perceptual surveys, and by providing samples of school improvement plans, Gold File catalogs, and web site addresses to schools visited. Additional technical assistance was provided to the Districts through discussions with the ECOE committees and chairs about the process. In November 1997, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives in conjunction with the announced monitoring visits. Workshops on brainstorming and consensus building and asking strategic questions were held in January and February 1998. In March 1998, the field service representatives conducted ECOE team visits and prepared materials for the NCA workshop. Technical assistance was provided in workshops on the ECOE process and team visits. In April 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process and academically distressed schools. In May 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process, and team visits were conducted. 40 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) In June 1998, the Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 13-15, 1998. Major conference topics included information on the process of continuous school improvement, curriculum alignment, \"Smart Start,\" Distance Learning, using data to improve academic performance, educational technology, and multicultural education. All school districts in Arkansas were invited and representatives from Pulaski County attended. In September 1998, requests for technical assistance were received, visitation schedules were established, and assistance teams began visiting the Districts. Assistance was provided by telephone and on-site visits. The ADE provided inservice training on \"Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement\" at Gibbs Magnet Elementary school on October 5, 1998 at their request. The staff was taught how to increase test scores through data disaggregation, analysis, alignment, longitudinal achievement review, and use of individualized test data by student, teacher, class and content area. Information was also provided regarding the \"Smart Start\" and the \"Academic Distress\" initiatives. On October 20, 1998, ECOE technical assistance was provided to Southwest Jr. High School. B. Identify available resources for providing technical assistance for the specific condition, or circumstances of need, considering resources within ADE and the Districts, and also resources available from outside sources and experts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. C. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 41 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) C. D. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. (Continued} 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 An updated ERIC Search was conducted on May 15, 1995 to locate research on evaluating compensatory education programs. The ADE received the updated ERIC disc that covered material through March 1995. An ERIC search was conducted in September 30, 1996 to identify current research dealing with the evaluation of compensatory education programs, and the articles were reviewed. An ERIC search was conducted in April 1997 to identify current research on compensatory education programs and sent to the Cycle 1 principals and the field service specialists for their use. An Eric search was conducted in October 1998 on the topic of Compensatory Education and related descriptors. The search included articles with publication dates from 1997 through July 1998. Identify and research technical resources available to ADE and the Districts through programs and organizations such as the Desegregation Assistance Center in San Antonio, Texas. 1. Projected Ending Date Summer 1994 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. E. Solicit, obtain, and use available resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. 42 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 From March 1995 through July 1995, technical assistance and resources were obtained from the following sources: the Southwest Regional Cooperative\nUALR regarding training for monitors\nODM on a project management software\nADHE regarding data review and display\nand Phi Delta Kappa, the Desegregation Assistance Center and the Dawson Cooperative regarding perceptual surveys. Technical assistance was received on the Microsoft Project software in November 1995, and a draft of the PMT report using the new software package was presented to the ADE administrative team for review. In December 1995, a data manager was hired permanently to provide technical assistance with computer software and hardware. In October 1996, the field service specialists conducted workshops in the Districts to address their technical assistance needs and provided assistance for upcoming team visits. In November and December 1996, the field service specialists addressed technical assistance needs of the schools in the Districts as they were identified and continued to provide technical assistance for the upcoming team visits. In January 1997, a draft of the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties. The ECOE monitoring section of the report included information that identified technical assistance needs and resources available to the Cycle 1 schools. Technical assistance was provided during the January 29-31, 1997 Title I MidWinter Conference. The conference emphasized creating a learning community by building capacity schools to better serve all children and empowering parents to acquire additional skills and knowledge to better support the education of their children. In February 1997, three ADE employees attended the Southeast Regional Conference on Educating Black Children. Participants received training from national experts who outlined specific steps that promote and improve the education of black children. 43 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On March 6-9, 1997, three members of the ADE's Technical Assistance Section attended the National Committee for School Desegregation Conference. The participants received training in strategies for Excellence and Equity: Empowerment and Training for the Future. Specific information was received regarding the current status of court-ordered desegregation, unitary status, and resegregation and distributed to the Districts and ADE personnel. The field service specialists attended workshops in March on ACT testing and school improvement to identify technical assistance resources available to the Districts and the ADE that will facilitate desegregation efforts. ADE personnel attended the Eighth Annual Conference on Middle Level Education in Arkansas presented by the Arkansas Association of Middle Level Education on April 6-8, 1997. The theme of the conference was Sailing Toward New Horizons. In May 1997, the field service specialists attended the NCA annual conference and an inservice session with Mutiu Fagbayi. An Implementation Oversight Committee member participated in the Consolidated COE Plan inservice training. In June and July 1997, field service staff attended an SAT-9 testing workshop and participated in the three-day School Improvement Conference held in Hot Springs. The conference provided the Districts with information on the COE school improvement process, technical assistance on monitoring and assessing achievement, availability of technology for the classroom teacher, and teaching strategies for successful student achievement. In August 1997, field service personnel attended the ASCD Statewide Conference and the AAEA Administrators Conference. On August 18, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held and presentations were made on the Early Literacy Learning in Arkansas (ELLA) program and the Schools of the 21st Century program. In September 1997, technical assistance was provided to the Cycle 2 principals on data collection for onsite and offsite monitoring. ADE personnel attended the Region VI Desegregation Conference in October 1997. Current desegregation and educational equity cases and unitary status issues were the primary focus of the conference. On October 14, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held in Paragould to enable members to observe a 21st Century school and a school that incorporates traditional and multi-age classes in its curriculum. 44 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) In November 1997, the field service representatives attended the Governor's Partnership Workshop to discuss how to tie the committee's activities with the ECOE process. In March 1998, the field service representatives attended a school improvement conference and conducted workshops on team building and ECOE team visits. Staff development seminars on Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement are scheduled for March 23, 1998 and March 27, 1998 for the Districts. In April 1998, the Districts participated in an ADE seminar to aid them in evaluating and improving student achievement. In August 1998, the Field Service Staff attended inservice to provide further assistance to schools, i.e., Title I Summer Planning Session, ADE session on Smart Start, and the School Improvement Workshops. All schools and districts in Pulaski County were invited to attend the \"Smart Start\" Summit November 9, 10, and 11 to learn more about strategies to increase student performance. \"Smart Start\" is a standards-driven educational initiative which emphasizes the articulation of clear standards for student achievement and accurate measures of progress against those standards through assessments, staff development and individual school accountability. The Smart Start Initiative focused on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. Representatives from all three districts attended. On January 21, 1998, the ADE provided staff development for the staff at Oak Grove Elementary School designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement. Using achievement data from Oak Grove, educators reviewed trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. On February 24, 1999, the ADE provided staff development for the administrative staff at Clinton Elementary School regarding analysis of achievement data. On February 15, 1999, staff development was rescheduled for Lawson Elementary School. The staff development program was designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement using achievement data from Lawson, educators reviewed the components of the Arkansas Smart Initiative, trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. Student Achievement Workshops were rescheduled for So!,Jthwest Jr. High in the Little Rock School District, and the Oak Grove Elementary School in the Pulaski County School District. 45 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On April 30, 1999, a Student Achievement Workshop was conducted for Oak Grove Elementary School in PCSSD. The Student Achievement Workshop for Southwest Jr. High in LRSD has been rescheduled. On June 8, 1999, a workshop was presented to representatives from each of the Arkansas Education Service Cooperatives and representatives from each of the three districts in Pulaski County. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACTAAP). On June 18, 1999, a workshop was presented to administrators of the NLRSD. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACTAAP). On August 16, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACT AAP program was presented during the preschool staff development activities for teaching assistant in the LRSD. On August 20, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACT AAP program was presented during the preschool staff development activities for the Accelerated Learning Center in the LRSD. On September 13, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACTAAP program were presented to the staff at Booker T. Washington Magnet Elementary School. On September 27, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was presented to the Middle and High School staffs of the NLRSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On October 26, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was presented to LRSD personnel through a staff development training class. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On December 7, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was scheduled for Southwest Middle School in the LRSD. The workshop was also set to cover the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. However, Southwest Middle School administrators had a need to reschedule, therefore the workshop will be rescheduled. 46 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On January 10, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for both Dr. Martin Luther King Magnet Elementary School \u0026amp; Little Rock Central High School. The workshops also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On March 1 , 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for all principals and district level administrators in the PCSSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On April 12, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for the LRSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. Targeted staffs from the middle and junior high schools in the three districts in Pulaski County attended the Smart Step Summit on May 1 and May 2. Training was provided regarding the overview of the \"Smart Step\" initiative, \"Standard and Accountability in Action,\" and \"Creating Learning Environments Through Leadership Teams.\" The ADE provided training on the development of alternative assessment September 12-13, 2000. Information was provided regarding the assessment of Special Education and LEP students. Representatives from each district were provided the opportunity to select a team of educators from each school within the district to participate in professional development regarding Integrating Curriculum and Assessment K-12. The professional development activity was directed by the national consultant, Dr. Heidi Hays Jacobs, on September 14 and 15, 2000. The ADE provided professional development workshops from October 2 through October 13, 2000 regarding, ''The Write Stuff: Curriculum Frameworks, Content Standards and Item Development.\" Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation provided the training. Representatives from each district were provided the opportunity to select a team of educators from each school within the district to participate. The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems by video conference for Special Education and LEP Teachers on November 17, 2000. Also, Alternative Assessment Portfolio System Training was provided for testing coordinators through teleconference broadcast on November 27, 2000. 47 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On December 12, 2000, the ADE provided training for Test Coordinators on end of course assessments in Geometry and Algebra I Pilot examination. Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation conducted the professional development at the Arkansas Teacher Retirement Building. The ADE presented a one-day training session with Dr. Cecil Reynolds on the Behavior Assessment for Children (BASC). This took place on December 7, 2000 at the NLRSD Administrative Annex. Dr. Reynolds is a practicing clinical psychologist. He is also a professor at Texas A \u0026amp; M University and a nationally known author. In the training, Dr. Reynolds addressed the following: 1) how to use and interpret information obtained on the direct observation form, 2) how to use this information for programming, 3) when to use the BASC, 4) when to refer for more or additional testing or evaluation, 5) who should complete the forms and when, (i.e., parents, teachers, students), 6) how to correctly interpret scores. This training was intended to especially benefit School Psychology Specialists, psychologists, psychological examiners, educational examiners and counselors. During January 22-26, 2001 the ADE presented the ACT AAP Intermediate (Grade 6) Benchmark Professional Development Workshop on Item Writing. Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation provided the training. Representatives from each district were invited to attend. On January 12, 2001 the ADE presented test administrators training for mid-year End of Course (Pilot) Algebra I and Geometry exams. This was provided for schools with block scheduling. On January 13, 2001 the ADE presented SmartScience Lessons and worked with teachers to produce curriculum. This was shared with eight Master Teachers. The SmartScience Lessons were developed by the Arkansas Science Teachers Association in conjunction with the Wilbur Mills Educational Cooperative under an Eisenhower grant provided by the ADE. The purpose of SmartScience is to provide K-6 teachers with activity-oriented science lessons that incorporate reading, writing, and mathematics skills. The following training has been provided for educators in the three districts in Pulaski County by the Division of Special Education at the ADE since January 2000: On January 6, 2000, training was conducted for the Shannon Hills Pre-school Program, entitled \"Things you can do at home to support your child's learning.\" This was presented by Don Boyd - ASERC and Shelley Weir. The school's director and seven parents attended. 48 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On March 8, 2000, training was conducted for the Southwest Middle School in Little Rock, on ADD. Six people attended the training. There was follow-up training on Learning and Reading Styles on March 26. This was presented by Don Boyd - ASERC and Shelley Weir. On September?, 2000, Autism and Classroom Accommodations for the LRSD at Chicot Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Karen Sabo, Kindergarten Teacher\nMelissa Gleason, Paraprofessional\nCurtis Mayfield, P.E. Teacher\nLisa Poteet, Speech Language Pathologist\nJane Harkey, Principal\nKathy Penn-Norman, Special Education Coordinator\nAlice Phillips, Occupational Therapist. On September 15, 2000, the Governor's Developmental Disability Coalition Conference presented Assistive Technology Devices \u0026amp; Services. This was held at the Arlington Hotel in Hot Springs. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On September 19, 2000, Autism and Classroom Accommodations for the LRSD at Jefferson Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Melissa Chaney, Special Education Teacher\nBarbara Barnes, Special Education Coordinator\na Principal, a Counselor, a Librarian, and a Paraprofessional. On October 6, 2000, Integrating Assistive Technology Into Curriculum was presented at a conference in the Hot Springs Convention Center. Presenters were: Bryan Ayers and Aleecia Starkey. Speech Language Pathologists from LRSD and NLRSD attended. On October 24, 2000, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On October 25 and 26, 2000, Alternate Assessment for Students with Severe Disabilities for the LRSD at J. A. Fair High School was presented. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. The participants were: Susan Chapman, Special Education Coordinator\nMary Steele, Special Education Teacher\nDenise Nesbit, Speech Language Pathologist\nand three Paraprofessionals. On November 14, 2000, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On November 17, 2000, training was conducted on Autism for the LRSD at the Instructional Resource Center. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. 49 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On December 5, 2000, Access to the Curriculum Via the use of Assistive Technology Computer Lab was presented. Bryan Ayres was the presenter of this teleconference. The participants were: Tim Fisk, Speech Language Pathologist from Arch Ford Education Service Cooperative at Plumerville and Patsy Lewis, Special Education Teacher from Mabelvale Middle School in the LRSD. On January 9, 2001, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. Kathy Brown, a vision consultant from the LRSD, was a participant. On January 23, 2001, Autism and Classroom Modifications for the LRSD at Brady Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Beverly Cook, Special Education Teacher\nAmy Littrell, Speech Language Pathologist\nJan Feurig, Occupational Therapist\nCarolyn James, Paraprofessional\nCindy Kackly, Paraprofessional\nand Rita Deloney, Paraprofessional. The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems for Special Education and Limited English Proficient students through teleconference broadcast on February 5, 2001. Presenters were: Charlotte Marvel, ADE\nDr. Gayle Potter, ADE\nMarcia Harding, ADE\nLynn Springfield, ASERC\nMary Steele, J. A. Fair High School, LRSD\nBryan Ayres, Easter Seals Outreach. This was provided for Special Education teachers and supervisors in the morning, and Limited English Proficient teachers and supervisors in the afternoon. The Special Education session was attended by 29 teachers/administrators and provided answers to specific questions about the alternate assessment portfolio system and the scoring rubric and points on the rubric to be used to score the portfolios. The LEP session was attended by 16 teachers/administrators and disseminated the common tasks to be included in the portfolios: one each in mathematics, writing and reading. On February 12-23, 2001, the ADE and Data Recognition Corporation personnel trained Test Coordinators in the administration of the spring Criterion-Referenced Test. This was provided in 20 sessions at 1 O regional sites. Testing protocol, released items, and other testing materials were presented and discussed. The sessions provided training for Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy, Algebra and Geometry Pilot Tests. The LRSD had 2 in attendance for the End of Course session and 2 for the Benchmark session. The NLRSD had 1 in attendance for the End of Course session and 1 for the Benchmark session. The PCSSD had 1 in attendance for the End of Course session and 1 for the Benchmark session. 50 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On March 15, 2001, there was a meeting at the ADE to plan professional development for staff who work with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) students. A $30,000 grant has been created to provide LEP training at Chicot Elementary for a year, starting in April 2001. A $40,000 grant was created to provide a Summer English as Second Language (ESL) Academy for the LRSD from June 18 through 29, 2001. Andre Guerrero from the ADE Accountability section met with Karen Broadnax, ESL Coordinator at LRSD, Pat Price, Early Childhood Curriculum Supervisor at LRSD, and Jane Harkey, Principal of Chicot Elementary. On March 1-2 and 8-29, 2001, ADE staff performed the following activities: processed registration for April 2 and 3 Alternate Portfolio Assessment video conference quarterly meeting\nanswered questions about Individualized Educational Plan (IEP) and LEP Alternate Portfolio Assessment by phone from schools and Education Service Cooperatives\nand signed up students for alternate portfolio assessment from school districts. On March 6, 2001, ADE staff attended a Smart Step Technology Leadership Conference at the State House Convention Center. On March 7, 2001, ADE staff attended a National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Regional Math Framework Meeting about the Consensus Project 2004. On March 8, 2001, there was a one-on-one conference with Carole Villarreal from Pulaski County at the ADE about the LEP students with portfolios. She was given pertinent data, including all the materials that have been given out at the video conferences. The conference lasted for at least an hour. On March 14, 2001, a Test Administrator's Training Session was presented specifically to LRSD Test Coordinators and Principals. About 60 LRSD personnel attended. The following meetings have been conducted with educators in the three districts in Pulaski County since July 2000. On July 10-13, 2000 the ADE provided Smart Step training. The sessions covered Standards-based classroom practices. 51 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On July 19-21, 2000 the ADE held the Math/Science Leadership Conference at UCA. This provided services for Arkansas math and science teachers to support systemic reform in math/science and training for 8th grade Benchmark. There were 200 teachers from across the state in attendance. On August 14-31, 2000 the ADE presented Science Smart Start Lessons and worked with teachers to produce curriculum. This will provide K-6 teachers with activity-oriented science lessons that incorporate reading, writing, and mathematics skills. On September 5, 2000 the ADE held an Eisenhower Informational meeting with Teacher Center Coordinators. The purpose of the Eisenhower Professional Development Program is to prepare teachers, school staff, and administrators to help all students meet challenging standards in the core academic subjects. A summary of the program was presented at the meeting. On November 2-3, 2000 the ADE held the Arkansas Conference on Teaching. This presented curriculum and activity workshops. More than 1200 attended the conference. On November 6, 2000 there was a review of Science Benchmarks and sample model curriculum. A committee of 6 reviewed and revised a drafted document. The committee was made up of ADE and K-8 teachers. On November 7-10, 2000 the ADE held a meeting of the Benchmark and End of Course Mathematics Content Area Committee. Classroom teachers reviewed items for grades 4, 6, 8 and EOC mathematics assessment. There were 60 participants. On December 4-8, 2000 the ADE conducted grades 4 and 8 Benchmark Scoring for Writing Assessment. This professional development was attended by approximately 750 teachers. On December 8, 2000 the ADE conducted Rubric development for Special Education Portfolio scoring. This was a meeting with special education supervisors to revise rubric and plan for scoring in June. On December 8, 2000 the ADE presented the Transition Mathematics Pilot Training Workshop. This provided follow-up training and activities for fourth-year mathematics professional development. On December 12, 2000 the ADE presented test administrators training for midyear End of Course (Pilot) Algebra I and Geometry exams. This was provided for schools with block scheduling. 52 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems for Special Education and Limited English Proficient students through teleconference broadcasts on April 2-3, 2001. Adminfstration of the Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy took place on April 23-27, 2001. Administration of the End of Course Algebra and Geometry Exams took place on May 2-3, 2001. Over 1,100 Arkansas educators attended the Smart Step Growing Smarter Conference on July 1 O and 11, 2001, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center. Smart Step focuses on improving student achievement for Grades 5-8. The Smart Step effort seeks to provide intense professional development for teachers and administrators at the middle school level, as well as additional materials and assistance to the state's middle school teachers. The event began with opening remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. Carl Boyd, a longtime educator and staff consultant for Learning 24-7, presented the first keynote address on ''The Character-Centered Teacher''. Debra Pic~ering, an education consultant from Denver, Colorado, pre?ented the second keynote address on \"Characteristics of Middle Level Education\". Throughout the Smart Step conference, educators attended breakout sessions that were grade-specific and curriculum area-specific. Pat Davenport, an education consultant from Houston, Texas, delivered two addresses. She spoke on \"A Blueprint for Raising Student Achievement\". Representatives from all three districts in Pulaski County attended. Over 1,200 Arkansas teachers and administrators attended the Smart Start Conference on July 12, 2001, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center. Smart Start is a standards-driven educational initiative which emphasizes the articulation of clear standards for student achievement and accurate measures of progress against those standards through assessments, staff development and individual school accountability. The Smart Start Initiative focused on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. The event began with opening remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. Carl Boyd, a longtime educator and staff consultant for Learning 24-7, presented the keynote address. The day featured a series of 15 breakout sessions on best classroom practices. Representatives from all three districts in Pulaski County attended. On July 18-20, 2001, the ADE held the Math/Science Leadership Conference at UCA. This provided services for Arkansas math and science teachers to support systemic reform in math/science and training for 8th grade Benchmark. There were approximately 300 teachers from across the state in attendance. 53 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) The ADE and Harcourt Educational Measurement conducted Stanford 9 test administrator training from August 1-9, 2001. The training was held at Little Rock, Jonesboro, Fort Smith, Forrest City, Springdale, Mountain Home, Prescott, and Monticello. Another session was held at the ADE on August 30, for those who were unable to attend August 1-9. The ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by video conference at the Education Service Cooperatives and at the ADE from 9:00 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on September 5, 2001. The ADE released the performance of all schools on the Primary and Middle Level Benchmark Exams on September 5, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Core Teacher In-Service training for Central in the LRSD on September 6, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Checklist training for Hall in the LRSD on September 7, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Checklist training for McClellan in the LRSD on September 13, 2001. The ADE conducted Basic Co-teaching training for the LRSD on October 9, 2001. The ADE conducted training on autism spectrum disorder for the PCSSD on October 15, 2001. Professional Development workshops (1 day in length) in scoring End of Course assessments in algebra, geometry and reading were provided for all districts in the state. Each school was invited to send three representatives (one for each of the sessions). LRSD, NLRSD, and PCSSD participated. Information and training materials pertaining to the Alternate Portfolio Assessment were provided to all districts in the state and were supplied as requested to LRSD, PCSSD and David 0. Dodd Elementary. On November 1-2, 2001 the ADE held the Arkansas Conference on Teaching at the Excelsior Hotel \u0026amp; Statehouse Convention Center. This presented sessions, workshops and short courses to promote exceptional teaching and learning. Educators could become involved in integrated math, science, English \u0026amp; language arts and social studies learning. The ADE received from the schools selected to participate in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), a list of students who will take the test. 54 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On December 3-7, 2001 the ADE conducted grade 6 Benchmark scoring training for reading and math. Each school district was invited to send a math and a reading specialist. The training was held at the Holiday Inn Airport in Little Rock. On December 4 and 6, 2001 the ADE conducted Mid-Year Test Administrator Training for Algebra and Geometry. This was held at the Arkansas Activities Association's conference room in North Little Rock. On January 24, 2002, the ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by ADE compressed video with Fred Jones presenting. On January 31, 2002, the ADE conducted the Smart Step quarterly meeting by NSCI satellite with Fred Jones presenting. On February 7, 2002, the ADE Smart Step co-sponsored the AR Association of Middle Level Principal's/ADE curriculum, assessment and instruction workshop with Bena Kallick presenting. On February 11-21, 2002, the ADE provided training for Test Administrators on the Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy, Algebra and Geometry Exams. The sessions took place at Forrest City, Jonesboro, Mountain Home, Springdale, Fort Smith, Monticello, Prescott, Arkadelphia and Little Rock. A make-up training broadcast was given at 15 Educational Cooperative Video sites on February 22. During February 2002, the LRSD had two attendees for the Benchmark Exam training and one attendee for the End of Course Exam training. The NLRSD and PCSSD each had one attendee at the Benchmark Exam training and one attendee for the  End of Course Exam training. The ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by compressed interactive video at the South Central Education Service Cooperative from 9:30 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on May 2, 2002. Telecast topics included creating a standards-based classroom and a seven-step implementation plan. The principal's role in the process was explained. The ADE conducted the Smart Step quarterly meeting by compressed interactive video at the South Central Education Service Cooperative from 9:30 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on May 9, 2002. Telecast topics included creating a standards-based classroom and a seven-step implementation plan. The principal's role in the process was explained. 55 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) The Twenty-First Annual Curriculum and Instruction Conference, co-sponsored by the Arkansas Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development and the Arkansas Department of Education, will be held June 24-26, 2002, at the Arlington Hotel in Hot Springs, Arkansas. \"Ignite Your Enthusiasm for Learning\" is the theme for this year's conference, which will feature educational consultant, Dr. Debbie Silver, as well as other very knowledgeable presenters. Additionally, there will be small group sessions on Curriculum Alignment, North Central Accreditation, Section 504, Building Level Assessment, Administrator Standards, Data Disaggregation, and National Board. The Educational Accountability Unit of the ADE hosted a workshop entitled \"Strategies for Increasing Achievement on the ACT AAP Benchmark Examination\" on June 13-14, 2002 at the Agora Center in Conway. The workshop was presented for schools in which 100% of students scored below the proficient level on one or more parts of the most recent Benchmark Examination. The agenda included presentations on ''The Plan-Do-Check-Act Instructional Cycle\" by the nationally known speaker Pat Davenport. ADE personnel provided an explanation of the MPH point program. Presentations were made by Math and Literacy Specialists. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, gave a presentation about ACTAAP. Break out sessions were held, in which school districts with high scores on the MPH point program offered strategies and insights into increasing student achievement. The NLRSD, LRSD, and PCSSD were invited to attend. The NLRSD attended the workshop. The Smart Start Summer Conference took place on July 8-9, 2002, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center and Peabody Hotel. The Smart Start Initiative focuses on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. The event included remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. After comments by the Director, Bena Kallick presented the keynote address \"Beyond Mapping: Essential Questions, Assessment, Higher Order Thinking\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. On the second day, Vivian Moore gave the keynote address \"Overcoming Obstacles: Avenues for Student Success\". Krista Underwood gave the presentation \"Put Reading First in Arkansas\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. 56 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) The Smart Step Summer Conference took place on July 10-11, 2002, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center and Peabody Hotel. Smart Step focuses on improving student achievement for Grades 5-8. The event included remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. After comments by the Director, Vivian Moore presented the keynote address \"Overcoming Obstacles: Avenues for Student Success\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. On the second day, Bena Kallick presented \"Beyond Mapping: Essential Questions, Assessment, Higher Order Thinking\". Ken Stamatis presented \"Smart Steps to Creating a School Culture That Supports Adolescent Comprehension\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. On August 8, 2002, Steven Weber held a workshop at Booker T. Washington Elementary on \"Best Practices in Social Studies\". It was presented to the 4th grade teachers in the Little Rock School District. The workshop focused around the five themes of geography and the social studies (fourth grade) framework/standards. Several Internet web sites were shared with the teachers, and the teachers were shown methods for incorporating writing into fourth grade social studies. One of the topics was using primary source photos and technology to stimulate the students to write about diverse regions. A theme of the workshop included identifying web sites which apply to fourth grade social studies teachers and interactive web sites for fourth grade students. This was a Back-to-School In-service workshop. The teachers were actively involved in the workshop. On August 13 Steven Weber conducted a workshop at Parkview High School in the LRSD. Topics of the workshop included: 1. Incorporating Writing in the Social Studies Classroom 2. Document Based (open-ended) Questioning Techniques 3. How to practice writing on a weekly basis without assigning a lengthy research report 4. Developing Higher Level Thinking Skills in order to produce active citizens, rather than passive, uninformed citizens 5. Using the Social Studies Framework 6. Identifying state and national Web Sites which contain Primary Sources for use in the classroom The 8:30 - 11 :30 session was for the 6 - 8 grade social studies teachers. The 12:30 - 3:00 session was for the 9 - 12 grade social studies teachers. Several handouts were used, also PowerPoint, primary source photos and documents, and Internet web sites (i.e., Library of Congress, Butler Center for Arkansas Studies, National Archives, etc.). This was a Back-to-School In-service workshop. The teachers were actively involved in the workshop. Marie McNeal is the Social Studies Specialist for the Little Rock School District. She invited Steven Weber to present at the workshop, and was in attendance. 57 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 (Continued) On September 30 through October 11, 2002, the ADE provided Professional Development for Test Administrators on the End of Course Literacy, Algebra and Geometry Exams. The train\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_213","title":"Enrollment, LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD, gender and racial count, school capacity, and transfers","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2004-10-01"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Educational statistics","Education and state","School integration","Little Rock School District","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","School districts--Arkansas--Pulaski County"],"dcterms_title":["Enrollment, LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD, gender and racial count, school capacity, and transfers"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/213"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nM TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002000 COUNTY: NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED TO (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL 1 DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 DISTRICT: 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NON- DAYS TRANSPORTED ABSENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25528.40 1194. 60 QUARTER NO. 1 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 554.97 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 580.92 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 554.97 580.92 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002050 COUNTY: PULASKI NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: 1 DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NON-TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 309.00 AMBOY ELEMENTAR 4 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 13. 00 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 QUARTER NO. 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 6. 72 1 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 7.00 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 6.72 7.00 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 1 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002055 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: CRESTWOOD ELEME QUARTER NO. 1 NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 53.00 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 6.00 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 1.15 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 1. 28 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 1.15 1.28 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 4 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002057 COUNTY: PULASKI NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: INDIAN HILLS EL QUARTER NO. 1 1 DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 136.00 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 2.00 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 2.96 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 3.00 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 2.96 3.00 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 6 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002058 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: LAKEWOOD ELEMEN QUARTER NO. 1 NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 547.50 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 9.50 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 11. 90 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 12 .11 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 11.90 12.11 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 7 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002059 COUNTY: PULASKI NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: POPLAR STREET M QUARTER NO. 1 1 DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 1834.50 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 62.50 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 39.88 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 41. 24 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 39.88 41.24 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 8 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002060 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: LYNCH DRIVE ELE QUARTER NO. 1 NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 4 6. 00 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 1.00 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 1.00 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 1.00 1.00 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 9 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002063 COUNTY: PULASKI NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: NO. HEIGHTS ELE QUARTER NO. 1 1 DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 179. 00 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 5.00 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 3. 89 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 4.00 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 3.89 4.00 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 11 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, ANO ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002064 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: PARK HILL ELEME QUARTER NO. 1 NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 41. 00 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 5.00 5 AOT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 0.89 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 1.00 TOTAL AOT, ADA, ANO ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 0.89 1.00 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 12 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002065 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: PIKE VIEW ELEME QUARTER NO. 1 NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL 1 DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 32 9. 00 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 9.00 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 7.15 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 7.35 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 7.15 7.35 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 13 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002070 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: LAKEWOOD MIDDLE QUARTER NO. 1 NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL 1 DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 6495.00 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 304.00 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 141.20 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 147. 80 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 141,20 147.80 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 16 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002075 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: NLR HIGH SCHOOL QUARTER NO. 1 NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL DAYS DAYS IN PRESENT QTR TRANSPORTED 46 46 46 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 8612.00 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 332.00 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 187.22 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 194. 4 3 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 187.22 194.43 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 17 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002076 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: NLR HIGH SCHOOL QUARTER NO. 1 NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL 1 DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED o.oo 0.00 6677.40 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 414. 60 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 145 .16 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 154.17 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 145.16 154.17 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 18 M TOM STUDENT QUARTERLY ATTENDANCE REPORT FY 2004/05 (FOR CALCULATING ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM SCHOOL STUDENTS IN GRADES K-12) LEA: 6002702 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL: RIDGEROAD CHART QUARTER NO. 1 NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS RECEIVED (BY M TOM TRANSFER) 7701 LITTLE ROCK 7702 NORTH LITTLE ROCK 7703 PULASKI CO SPECIAL 1 DAYS IN QTR 46 46 46 2 DAYS PRESENT TRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 DAYS PRESENT NONTRANSPORTED 0.00 0.00 269.00 DAYS ABSENT 0.00 0.00 32.00 5 ADT 2/1 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADA 2+3/1 0.00 0.00 5.85 7 ADM 2+3+4/1 0.00 0.00 6.54 TOTAL ADT, ADA, AND ADM OF M TOM RECEIVED: 0.00 5.85 6.54 STUDENTS ELIGIBLE TO BE COUNTED AS TRANSPORTED INCLUDE RESIDENT STUDENTS RESIDING TWO ROUTE MILES OR MORE FROM THEIR RESPECTIVE ASSIGNED SCHOOLS PAGE: 20 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM RECEIVED OCTOBER 1, 2004 NO2V 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS OFFIOCEF OESEGREGOANTIITOOtUR,I NG joo1-C E TRAL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I 09 II 9 189 225 4 8 0 153 144 744 10 7 7 152 140 7 2 2 0 107 136 560 II 6 14 125 104 2 0 0 0 126 107 484 ---- 12 s 4 92 98 3 4 0 105 103 415 TOT AL FOR: CE TRAL 29 34 558 567 16 14 2 2 491 490 2,203 ,_.. I ~:5 __,,,, J I - ., _/ 1002-HALL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL1 09 2 2 223 197 20 34 24 22 526 IO 2 3 137 125 22 26 0 22 18 356 II 4 107 133 13 IS 0 0 27 32 334 12 2 97 84 IO II 2 0 17 22 248 TOTAL FOR: HALL 9 12 564 539 65 86 4 90 94 1,464 ,- //C3 177 I ~ ... ~ 1003-MANN M/S GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 06 6 91 59 8 4 0 0 73 SI 293 07 s 7 94 54 5 4 0 0 73 52 294 08 8 s 83 58 6 6 0 59 60 286 - TOTAL FOR: MANN MIS 19 13 268 171 19 14 0 205 163 873\"\" ~a? / (, ~(,,../ .$ joos- p ARK.VIEW GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 09 7 3 87 64 8 0 71 57 301 IO 4 83 62 6 6 60 56- 280 II 6 3 80 59 5 4 2 0 65 50 274 12 2 6 83 47 6 3 0 0 66 40 253 - TOTAL FOR: PARKVIEW 16 16 333 232 25 16 3 2 262 203 1,108..., L5l~ .,, 7 -y\"i::= COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 1 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 006-BOOKER GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I Ol 2 0 30 24 2 0 0 15 21 95 02 0 0 26 29 0 0 32 18 107 03 26 29 2 2 0 0 28 15 104 04 23 24 2 2 0 25 16 95 05 0 34 27 2 3 0 0 25 20 l 12 K 0 0 23 28 2 0 0 20 18 92 TOT AL FOR: BOOKER 5 2 162 161 10 9 3 0 145 108 605.. .......- _J\n'.\nf3 d(9 ~53 ~ 1001-ou BARM/S GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL1 06 3 7 77 85 9 4 0 0 30 40 255 ------- 07 3 3 81 68 5 9 0 0 25 48 242 08 6 74 68 7 11 0 37 43 250 TOTAL FOR: DUNBAR MIS 12 13 232 221 21 24 0 92 131 747.....- _-fl\n\u0026gt;~ 71 ~\nr~ ~I 7- 008-FAIR GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL ---- 09 0 3 157 150 6 6 0 12 27 362 --- - 10 0 0 130 133 2 2 15 21 305 ll 0 102 89 3 2 0 10 12 220 12 0 0 61 75 0 16 12 171 ---- -- TOTAL FOR: FAIR 1 3 450 447 12 15 4 53 72 1,058 ..-- gq',\" /~'5 - ?.~-'o 009 -FORST HTS MIS GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM M WF WM TOTAL ------ 06 0 84 84 3 4 0 0 20 24 222 - -- 07 0 92 95 2 0 0 15 24 230 ---- --- - -- 08 2 88 90 2 3 0 0 27 23 236 - -- TOTAL FOR: FORST HTS M/S 2 5 264 269 7 8 0 0 62 71 688.....- 53~ ~~ ')7/. - ---------------- COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 2 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 010 - PUL HTS M/S GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF M WF WM TOTAL I 06 0 62 58 0 0 46 56 225 07 2 67 65 0 0 0 61 47 244 08 0 74 78 0 0 0 40 45 239 TOTAL FOR: PUL HTS MIS 4 203 2101 2 0 147 148 708 ..,...- .fo CJ\nJ,15 65'7~ 011- SOUTHWSTM IS GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM F NM WF WM TOTAL: 06 0 0 66 72 2 2 0 0 5 3 150 07 0 82 72 0 0 3 165 08 0 85 89 0 0 0 0 2 178 TOT AL FOR: SOUTHWST MIS 233 233 7 3 0 0 8 7 493 ........- ~i(.p\na- /-5 9~7. 012-MCCLELLA GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM F NM WF WM TOTAL! 09 0 0 126 146 5 2 0 0 7 II 297 10 0 145 107 2 4 0 2 9 271 11 0 0 82 81 4 2 0 0 6 8 183 12 0 0 77 85 0 0 4 4 174 TOTAL FOR: MCCLELLA 0 430 419 12 11 1 0 19 32 925-- j~9 ~5 ~I 2\n).7,. 013- HENDERSNM /S GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! 06 0 95 IOI 6 0 0 15 10 235 ----- 07 3 64 87 12 0 0 9 7 184 - -~---- 08 92 79 9 12 0 7 9 211 TOTAL FOR: HENDERSN MIS s 2 251 267 17 30 1 0 31 26 630 - - --- . - a-lg- ~-s ~1 ___ 8'3-?. 015-CLOVR M/S GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM -\nOTAL] 06 0 0 105 84 18 17 0 3 5 233 07 0 94 105 IS 19 0 0 5 2 241 08 0 99 73 12 14 0 0 8 208 TOT AL FOR: CLOVR MIS 298 262 45 50 0 16 a.i 682 - a\"P ~~ 3'\nt?. COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 3 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 016 - MABEL M/S GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL _I - 06 0 0 95 77 4 2 0 0 14 17 209 07 0 0 73 87 4 0 0 9 17 l9l 08 0 0 88 95 2 4 0 0 20 25 234 ------ - TOTAL FOR: MABEL MIS 0 0 256 259 10 7 0 0 43 59 634 - 815 17 /0 c}-1 81~ f 017 - BALE GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 0 14 17 5 0 0 0 4 2 42 02 0 0 23 16 5 4 0 0 2 51 03 0 0 19 20 3 0 0 2 48 04 0 0 13 19 0 0 0 0 34 05 0 0 20 19 0 0 5 47 K 0 29 21 0 0 2 3 60 p 0 0 20 12 I .\nl,. 0 0 I 3 2 37 ..,l-~ TOTAL FOR: BALE 0 138 124 16 12 10 16 319 - _., ..... ~I ------- .?\\ ~~ \"\"\"'  1018-BRADY GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! L - --- Ol 0 18 22 0 0 0 4 47 02 0 0 JO 16 2 0 0 4 2 35 03 0 16 22 4 0 0 3 3 50 04 0 0 22 12 3 0 0 0 2 40 05 0 17 19 0 0 0 4 3 45 - -- - ------ K 0 18 29 3 2 0 0 4 7 64 - p 0 0 13 14 o 0 0 0 0 6 n4 37 ~i? - TOTAL FOR: BRADY I 3 114 134 11 7 0 0 23 25 318 i--- ~..\u0026gt;.r8' ~~ -1? 78\"?. - - COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 4 of16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 020 - MCDERMOT GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM M WF WM TOTAL 01 2 0 23 15 4 3 0 0 IO 6 63 02 3 24 22 0 4 0 0 6 65 03 3 0 14 23 2 2 0 0 9 IO 63 04 2 26 18 2 4 0 0 7 8 68 05 0 13 14 2 3 0 0 14 4 51 K 2 2 18 16 3 0 0 9 5 56 p 2 0 16 ~'111 0 2-\"/ 0 0 4 c:. 5 40 ~r1. TOTAL FOR: MCDERMOT 14 5 134 119 11 21 0 0 59 43 406 _- ol'53 BJ/ /oc).J ~\n,. 1021 - CARVER GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I 01 2 17 28 0 0 16 16 82 02 20 21 2 0 17 16 80 03 4 15 31 2 0 15 21 91 04 0 0 25 18 3 0 0 II 26 84 OS 25 20 3 0 0 13 22 86 K 0 23 17 0 0 0 18 13 73 TOTAL FOR: CARVER 6 7 125 135 6 9 2 2 90 114 496-- ~Ceo s\n,.... d:}Gi .,g~- 1022 - BASELINE GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! 01 2 0 II 20 3 2 0 2 3 44 02 0 0 16 21 3 0 0 0 42 -- --- ------ - 03 0 0 20 19 2 0 0 2 45 ---- ----- 04 0 0 12 16 3 2 0 0 3 2 38 --- ----- --- -- - - 05 0 0 16 17 3 0 0 4 42 ---- K 0 0 17 18 4 0 0 0 41 p 0 0 11\n::\u0026gt; 21 \"' 0 0 3 ~ 2 39 _,7. - - TOT AL FOR: BASELINE 2 0 103 132 13 15 0 I 15 10 291 --- _\ni,~.t\n~, ~-s 8Vo COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 5 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 1023 - FAIR PRK GRADE AF AM BF BM HF RM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 2 10 II 0 0 0 0 2 4 29 02 0 0 7 13 0 0 0 2 2 25 03 0 0 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 16 04 0 0 8 10 0 0 0 0 0 19 OS 0 10 10 0 0 0 0 3 2 26 K 0 II IO 0 0 0 4 7 34 p 2 15 13 0 3 0 0 0 5 .. 2 38 ,. TOTAL FOR: FAIR PRK 2 5 67 74 1 0 0 20 17 ~  pl/ Cf ~7 ~7- 1024 - FORST PK GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM ~OTAL] 01 2 8 2 0 0 0 28 27 69 02 0 5 7 0 0 0 0 22 23 58 03 0 6 7 2 0 0 21 18 56 04 2 6 9 0 0 0 6 18 43 05 6 9 0 0 0 0 8 10 35 K 3 0 0 0 26 27 60 p 2\n)... 0 0 .., 0 0 0 18\n18 40 7- TOTAL FOR: FORST PK 5 9 36 35 3 129 141 -361,,,,..- '11 \u0026lt;f\n..O 6170 ~o? 1025 - FRAl~KLIN GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM F NM WF WM TO~A~] 01 0 0 37 30 0 0 0 0 0 68 02 0 26 3 I 0 0 0 0 0 59 03 0 0 26 26 0 0 0 0 2 0 54 04 0 22 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 05 0 0 18 28 0 0 0 0 48 K 0 26 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 p 0 0 26~-26 0 0 I 0 57 \"' 7,. - TOTAL FOR: FRANKL! 3 0 181 192 0 0 4 5 387 ....-- ,?73 .tr 1 9c.- ~ ------ COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 6 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 1027 - GIBBS GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF M WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 0 II 14 2 0 0 0 7 II 45 02 0 2 13 10 0 0 0 8 10 44 03 2 15 10 0 2 0 0 4 11 45 04 0 2 20 15 2 0 0 12 13 65 05 3 19 17 2 0 0 17 II 71 K 2 8 12 0 0 0 3 13 40 -- ------- TOT AL FOR: GIBBS 6 8 86 7 5 7 0 0 51 69 310 ....- /(, ~(, /oiO ~7 jo2s - CHICOT GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF -w~ ~--T~TAL I 01 0 0 23 33 10 5 0 2 2 76 - -- --------- 02 0 0 29 33 5 11 0 0 3 86 ---- 03 0 0 33 27 6 6 0 0 4 79 - -------- -- 04 0 0 24 26 5 8 0 4 3 71 -- - ----- --- 05 0 0 26 37 7 8 0 0 5 86 K 0 0 26 29 IO 6 0 0 2 6 79 p 0 0 29 ..,4 17 8 3 0 0 0 ~2 59 '78il, TOTAL FOR: CHICOT 0 0 190 202 51 47 2 0 20 24 536 V- ~q ..... /00 -# ~~ jo29 - WEST HIL -- - - -- GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM T-~T~~J ----- - 01 0 0 17 15 0 0 0 3 6 42 - ----- - 02 0 0 22 12 0 0 4 0 40 - --- - - 03 0 0 16 12 2 2 0 0 5 0 37 04 0 0 17 16 0 4 0 0 3 7 47 05 0 0 14 14 0 0 0 3 4 36 K 0 0 12 19 0 0 0 4 4 40 p 0 0 9 II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 ~? .. -- --- TOT AL FOR: WEST HIL 0 0 107 99 5 7 0 22 21 262 _.- _:\n,\u0026lt;O~ ~ -t.3 7Q  ----- ---- -- ------- -- COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 7 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 030 - JEFFRSN GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 01 0 0 8 13 0 0 0 0 20 19 60 02 0 0 17 II 0 0 0 IS 16 60 03 I 3 18 0 0 0 25 14 73 04 0 0 13 13 0 0 0 0 21 21 68 OS 0 0 14 12 0 0 0 21 18 66 K 0 0 9 9 0 0 0 0 22 22 62 p 0 3 6 2 0 o I 0 0 12 22 40 I TOT AL FOR: JEFFRSN 2 77 78 3 0 0 0 136 132 429,,.....--\n-5 t,, e\nP41f .:!Jt. /. 1031 - CLOVR EL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! I 01 0 0 21 31 13 7 0 0 74 02 0 0 18 28 s s 0 0 0 2 58 03 0 0 20 13 6 0 0 2 0 42 04 0 0 17 16 2 4 0 0 2 3 44 05 0 0 17 17 4 4 0 0 0 43 K 0 26 20 4 5 0 0 2 59 p 0 0 19- 13 2 4 ,, 0 0 40 ~ TOTAL FOR: CLOVR EL 0 138 138 36 30 0 0 7 10 360 ,__. c\n).7{, \u0026amp;1 /7 77,7. t2-DODD - GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF M WF WM TOTAL 01 0 0 10 11 3 3 0 0 3 4 34 02 0 0 12 8 4 6 0 0 3 6 39 - --- 03 0 0 8 17 0 0 0 4 6 36 04 0 0 7 13 3 5 0 0 5 8 41 05 0 0 9 8 5 2 0 0 10 3 37 K 0 0 6 10 5 3 0 0 4 9 37 p 0 0 10 ...... 12 23 0 0 8 4 r~~ TOTAL FOR: DODD 0 0 62 79 22 21 0 0 37 40 261 _. 1-1// 1/3 '7-, .i 1- -------- COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 8 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 1033 - MEADCLIF GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM M WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 0 21 17 3 0 0 2 7 51 02 0 0 14 20 2 2 0 0 2 4 44 03 0 17 18 3 0 0 2 3 45 04 0 0 24 22 2 2 0 0 3 3 56 05 0 23 17 3 0 0 4 4 53 K 0 0 17 27 3 0 0 8 4 60 p 0 0 18a=.11 l _\n0 0 I 3 2 40 ?a TOT AL FOR: MEADCLIF 134 138 13 13 0 0 22 27 349 _. ~1G1-- ~'! 9 ?t!,, ~4 - MITCHELL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF TOTAL-I 01 0 0 12 II 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 02 0 0 17 6 0 0 0 0 0 24 03 0 0 13 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 04 0 0 9 13 0 0 0 0 0 23 05 0 0 16 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 K 0 0 7 8 0 0 0 0 0 2 17 p 0 0 5 13 0 0 (' 0 0 20 7- .. TOT AL FOR: MITCHELL 0 0 79 71 0 0 . 0 2 3 156 -\n~P I ~ 9~?- 1035 - M L KING GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! 01 2 29 33 0 0 0 0 19 16 100 02 3 26 21 0 0 15 22 90 ------ 03 0 0 22 25 0 0 0 0 17 11 75 04 21 31 0 0 15 13 84 05 3 2 29 21 0 0 0 18 13 87 K 0 2 28 31 0 13 14 91 - p 3 16 c:, 30 0 3 8 17 80 .~?. TOTAL FOR: ML KING 10 10 171 192 6 2 4 105 106 607 ....... ~i?\u0026gt;- 6)~ al/ '-o?o COMPUTER INFORMATIONS ERVICESD EPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 9 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS io36 - ROCKFELR GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL L __ 01 0 2 22 22 0 0 0 9 10 66 02 0 28 24 2 0 0 7 8 71 03 0 0 21 20 0 0 6 7 56 04 0 0 18 17 0 0 0 11 4 51 05 0 0 22 12 2 0 0 6 8 51 K 0 0 19 22 0 0 0 6 7 55 p 28 31 4 '7 0 0 19 3rl 18 103 ~,-7. TOTALFOR:ROCKFELR 4 158 148 6 9 0 64 62 453 ,._... ~ ~ al /~~ t8'I 037 - GEYER SP GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 0 20 21 2 2 0 0 47 02 0 0 24 14 0 0 0 41 03 0 0 16 15 0 0 0 4 41 04 0 0 27 15 0 2 0 0 0 0 44 05 0 0 22 22 0 0 0 47 K 0 0 17 15 4 0 0 2 40 p 0 0 18 .\ni. . 17 2 0 ~ 0 0 0 2 39 7- TOTALFOR:GEYERSP 0 0 144 119 10 11 0 0 6 9 299 ...- ~\"'a J ~8' .. 038 - P L HT E GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF M WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 12 16 0 0 0 9 7 46 - --- 02 0 2 11 8 0 0 0 0 9 8 38 ------- 03 0 0 7 13 0 0 0 0 12 12 44 04 0 14 II 0 0 0 0 12 10 48 05 12 15 0 0 0 0 12 9 50 --- K 0 0 7 8 0 0 0 0 10 15 40 p 5 ~ 0 0 \"I 0 0 8 4 20 ao?. -- - - .. TOTAL FOR: PUL HT E 3 5 68 72 0 0 0 72 65 286 .....- ,10 '7 r~7 r, t COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 10ofl6 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 1039 - RIG-HTSEL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM F M WF WM TOTAL! 01 0 0 26 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 02 0 0 21 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 03 0 0 17 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 04 0 0 15 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 05 0 0 19 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 K 0 0 23 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 p 0 0 20 \"20 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 .. /.) TOTAL FOR: RIGHTSEL 0 0 141 121 0 0 0 0 0 0 262 ..,_., ol,(,:V (0 0 /O?- 1040 - ROMINE GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! I 01 0 0 19 17 4 0 0 0 6 47 02 0 0 17 16 3 4 0 0 3 4 47 03 0 0 12 12 2 0 0 3 3 35 04 0 0 17 23 2 2 0 2 48 05 0 14 22 3 0 0 3 47 K 0 0 21 24 8 6 0 0 0 60 p 0 14 - 17 4 (, 0 0 0 0 37 u 7- -- TOTAL FOR: ROMINE 114 131 20 321 '- 2~c/ 0 12 15 ~~6 ~7 76A r \\041- STEPHENS GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOT~ 01 0 0 39 32 0 0 0 74 ----- 02 0 0 30 39 0 0 (I 0 0 0 69 --- - . 03 0 45 32 2 0 0 3 85 ----- 04 0 0 32 30 0 0 0 0 64 05 0 0 30 35 0 0 0 0 69 K 0 0 37 38 0 0 2 80 ------ - --. p 0 0 286\"1 26 0 oo 0 0 0 4 58 '1 2 ----- - -- TOT AL FOR: STEPHENS 0 241 232 5 5 0 0 7 8 499 _.- -11 ~ // /'5 1~?- ---------- COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 11 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 042 -WASHNGTN GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 01 32 38 5 5 0 0 4 9 95 02 0 24 35 7 2 0 0 3 5 79 03 0 32 27 2 2 0 0 3 6 73 04 3 26 29 4 7 0 0 7 7 84 05 0 22 34 5 2 0 0 4 3 71 K 2 31 30 0 8 6 81 p 0 2 34 rl 33 2 0 0 0 4 5 80 ~ TOTAL FOR: WASHNGTN 6 10 201 226 26 19 0 33 7:) 563 _., .\n/').7 t,~ ?lJo 1043 - WILLIAMS ---- - GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! 01 4 19 16 2 0 0 0 13 13 68 02 4 3 19 15 0 0 0 7 19 68 03 3 3 23 25 0 0 0 20 14 89 04 6 6 22 25 0 0 0 15 13 88 05 2 5 29 18 2 0 II 20 89 K 20 9 0 0 0 12 15 59 - -- TOTAL FOR: WlLLIAMS 20 19 132 108 6 2 2 0 78 94 461 ....- ~ 0 -YQ 17~ ~ , - E4-WILso __ GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF M WF WM TOTALj __] 01 0 0 15 22 2 0 0 0 2 0 41 02 0 0 24 22 2 0 0 0 2 51 -- ------- 03 0 0 15 19 0 0 38 . ------ 04 0 2 13 16 0 0 0 0 33 --- 05 0 0 21 32 0 0 3 59 K 0 0 14 24 2 0 0 43 p 0 0 7 9 11 0 0 0 0 0 2 O 20 l- - . - . ---- TOTAL FOR: WILSO 0 2 109 146 8 4 2 0 6 8 285 - ~5S /~ /7 S: ~ ------------ - COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVJCES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 12 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 1045 - WOODRUFF GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL I 01 0 0 18 17 0 0 0 0 37 02 0 0 13 13 0 0 0 0 4 3 33 03 0 0 18 15 0 0 0 2 37 04 0 0 11 15 0 0 0 0 28 OS 0 0 IS 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 K 0 0 17 18 0 0 0 0 0 36 p 0 0 15 520 0 0 0 0 0 39 -- .  -~ ....... TOTAL FOR: WOODRUFF 0 0 107 108 0 0 8 10 ~/0 _\ni- 'g- C, ?- 1046 - MABEL EL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM -~ TOTAL I 01 0 0 8 18 0 0 0 5 3 35 02 0 16 17 0 0 0 2 2 39 03 0 0 14 12 0 2 0 0 4 33 04 0 0 21 11 0 0 2 0 36 05 0 0 8 22 0 0 0 3 6 40 K 0 14 13 3 0 0 0 2 38 p 0 0 13 al 18 2 1 :a 0 0 I\n), I 36 .I?. TOTAL FOR: MABEL EL 94 111 8 4 1 0 16 21 257 ,_. ~c5 15 ~1 ~(!) - 1047-TERRY GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM ~OTALI 01 6 28 34 2 0 0 16 15 103 02 7 3 27 25 7 0 0 0 14 14 97 03 6 24 24 2 4 0 0 16 10 87 04 3 2 18 18 0 3 0 0 13 17 74 05 3 18 20 6 2 0 0 I 5 15 80 K 6 3 24 29 4 2 0 0 14 14 96 p 2 3 12 I 6 0 ' I 0 0 8 /l. 8 40~?.. TOTAL FOR: TERRY 28 19 151 156 21 13 0 0 96 93 577 ...-- ~o1 ~, /?SJ ~\"\nl7. -------- COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 13 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 1048 - FULBRIGH GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF W\n~ TOTAL\\ 01 2 14 0 2 2 0 27 37 88 02 0 14 16 2 0 0 0 23 24 80 03 0 4 13 2 0 0 0 37 37 94 04 0 0 12 IO 0 0 18 36 78 05 4 0 14 18 0 0 19 26 83 K 3 15 3 0 0 34 33 91 p 0 3 'l 5 0 1 _\n)- 0 0 13':, 17 40 .., TOTAL FOR: FULBRIGH 7 7 65 7 7 5 3 0 171 210 554 ,.......- J.)./ ~1 $' ~ll- \\oso - OTTER CR GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM -~OTALI 01 3 0 15 24 5 3 17 12 81 ----- 02 0 30 25 3 2 0 0 14 15 90 03 0 0 20 27 0 0 0 0 9 12 68 ----- 04 0 0 23 23 3 0 0 0 12 IO 71 05 0 33 21 2 0 0 10 I 3 81 K 0 0 26 25 4 14 8 80 p 0 0 14 \"' 8 1 \" 0 0 10 ,I 6 40 ?- TOTAL FOR: OTTER CR 3 2 161 153 14 12 2 2 86 76 511V' _a5 /~~ (,I l \\os1 - W AKEFIEL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF M WF WM TOT~ 01 0 0 23 30 9 7 0 0 0 71 02 0 0 24 32 6 10 0 0 2 0 74 03 0 0 17 26 4 2 0 0 0 50 ---- 04 0 0 32 30 8 7 0 0 2 80 ------ 05 0 0 25 23 3 3 0 0 0 2 56 K 0 0 29 33 6 IO 0 0 2 0 80 - -- -- p 0 0 14 ...,a15 4 7 I I 0 0 0 I) O -~..,\n,? .. ------ - TOTAL FOR: WAKEFIEL 0 0 164 189 40 46 0 0 6 6 451-- ~~3 s\"' I~ 1%1 --- --- ---------- COMPUTER INFORJv!ATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 14 of 16 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENT REPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 052-WATSON GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM F 'M WF WM TOTAL OJ 0 0 28 44 0 0 0 0 2 75 02 0 31 41 0 0 0 0 75 03 0 0 30 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 04 0 0 25 35 0 0 0 0 62 OS 0 0 32 28 0 0 0 63 K 0 0 35 41 0 0 0 2 80 p 0 0 21 17 0 0 0 I I o 40 ~\n2. - - TOTAL FOR: WATSON 0 I 202 237 4 0 0 6 5 456...,.. -19-q ~ I/ ~?- \\ns-AGE CY GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL 01 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 3 6 13 02 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 3 8 03 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 4 13 04 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 5 12 OS 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 9 06 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 2 2 JO 07 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 7 ----- 08 0 0 5 II 0 0 0 0 4 3 23 09 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 2 5 21 10 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 4 16 - - -- ------------ 11 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 6 12 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 -- - - --- K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 -------- --- -- TOT AL FOR: AGE CY 2 0 25 47 0 0 0 2 34 38 148 ..... 1~ 3/ 7:\n)..\n. . COMPUTER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 15 ofl6 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 ENROLLMENTR EPORT WITH PRE-K STUDENTS 1766-ALC GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL! 06 0 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 07 0 0 7 20 0 0 0 0 0 4 31 8'~ 08 0 0 117126 0 0 0 0 0 l (_, l 39 ~~?. ~ 09 0 0 22 67 0 0 0 0 3 93 10 0 14 25 0 0 0 3 45 11 0 0 10 18 0 0 0 0 2 31 12 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 9 TOT AL FOR: ALC 0 70 ~J 0 0 0 5 13 261 178' J/..,\n)..\n}~ '9\n/ 1767-ACC L~ GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM TOTAL\\ j 09 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 10 11 0 0 14 16 0 0 0 3 35 12 0 37 37 2 0 0 0 2 11 90 -- TOT AL FOR: ACC LP 0 58 54 4 0 4 1 0 3 ,iJS 1361,1\"\"' I ~ 'R\nl, GRAND TOTAL: 227 230 8849 8876 643 647 39 28 3125 3204 25,868 - A.\nJ-\"rl \u0026lt;!., ~ 0 \" ,. ~rf{ ..J ~\n1.6 '8'a~/ t13 ~, ~o~J ~~, ,\no .,.l~O \u0026lt;zs\u0026amp;c\n\\9 {.,J./7 ~~ ~,~t,. 17\nl53 1,~10 l,~ 7\n:::. ~ 7 (~) ( (w (1 ?7~ COMPUTER INFORMATIONS ERVICESD EPT Friday, October 29, 2004 Page 16ofl6 STATEWIDE INFORMATION SYSTEM OCTOBER 1, 2004 LRSD ENROLLMENT REPORT W /0 METRO FINAL GRADE AF AM BF BM HF HM NF NM WF WM 01 27 14 649 729 78 47 8 2 245 273 02 19 22 678 684 67 59 2 2 229 243 03 15 20 620 660 45 50 3 266 234 04 16 21 638 645 46 61 6 2 216 251 05 22 17 662 671 54 51 2 242 236 - 06 10 12 679 635 51 40 2 0 208 208 07 13 15 656 656 37 48 0 0 200 204 08 18 12 699 667 39 50 2 205 2 II 09 20 17 812 856 43 53 4 270 269 10 10 16 672 597 42 40 6 3 209 248 II 16 21 521 503 27 23 3 2 236 215 12 9 14 449 _!34 23 26 193 K 19 17 656 682 63 63 3 4 250 266 p l3 l2 45811~57 28 36 q\n.,, 2 13~~ '.53 GRAND TOTAL: 227 230 8849 8876 643 647 39 28 3125 3204 (-:f\n)') {D) (wJ i:le ,-,-) g) 1 1)037 ,,,3,\n9~ (771 ----- LRSD INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT Friday, October 29, 2004 TOTAL I 2072 2005 1914 1902 1958 1845 1829 1904 2345 1843 1567 1365 2023 [296 7'1- 25,868 (. T /~, 110 lo S' (o ?\no 7\n:\nJ.-- te, 8\"~ l,\n,,l.l )) \\ 707/ ~5 ?\nJ.o l9~ Page 1 of! LEA: 6002050 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM PAGE: 1 COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: AMBOYE LEMENTARYSC HOOL I GRADEi ITOTALI WHITE M F M BLACK F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 581 81 61 171 241 21 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI 551 101 51 141 241 11 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI 541 101 81 191 141 11 11 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI 591 91 81 181 231 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 571 91 81 201 191 01 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI 421 51 41 191 141 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ---\n) CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 OI 01 01 01 0 r,: t!- ~--------+~I-+ __ ./+-- ++--2+-- C: +-- o +-- t'?+-- o+-- o+-- o+-----+---- ENRoLLI 3251 511 391 1071 1181 51 '- 41 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ~/5 -% 11./ /_:\nV / C\u0026gt; c\u0026gt; 7\u0026lt;? ~::5 / LEA: 6002053 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 3 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: BELWOODE LEMENTARYSC HOOL !GRADEi !TOTAL! WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 2 4 I 3 I 1 I 9 I 10 I 11 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 291 61 41 111 Bl 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 281 31 41 101 111 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 241 51 11 61 91 21 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 23 I 2 I 3 I 5 I 13 I OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 171 21 21 Bl 41 01 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 0 I O I ~ 0 I 0 I oi O I 0 I ~ O I O I 0 I 0 I 0 ---------+----+-----+~---+-----+~----+-----+--2--+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 1451 211 151 491 551 31 21 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002054 PUPIL ENROLLMENBTY SCHOOLF ORM PAGE: 5 COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: BOONEP ARK ELEMENTARYSC HOOL !GRADEi I TOTAL I WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 72 I 2 I 2 I 28 I 331 71 0 I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 721 11 01 341 361 01 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 621 01 01 361 251 01 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 561 21 01 211 321 01 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL! 571 21 01 271 261 11 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 671 01 11 331 321 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL! 3861 71 31 1791 1841 91 41 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- --:R, 1\u0026lt; d .?- _\ni .5(/~ ~ I 0 0 C' 0 ~~I -\nJ,Y-0 ? 5 ,\n?o3 ~o1 I/ 5 c\n..\u0026gt; (!_-. e:-, 0 9~?0 1! _,\n10 /',, LEA: 6002055 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENBTY SCHOOLF ORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 7 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: CRESTWOODEL EMENTARYSC HOOL I GRADEi I TOTALI WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 791 301 201 111 171 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 101 51 51 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI 511 161 191 71 91 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI 571 221 191 121 31 01 01 01 01 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI 751 281 261 131 71 01 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 651 241 251 41 81 21 01 11 01 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 21 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI 491 201 151 31 101 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI 0 I O I 0 I O I O I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+ r +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- cHoicE I 0 I 0 I {/f 0 I 0 I I 0 I 0 I (1 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ---------+-- -+-----~---+-----+m--+-----+-~---+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL1 3761 1401 1241 501 541 41 11 11 01 21 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 121 61 61 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ' -ne-J\u0026lt; --\n::\nJ g./lo LEA: 6002056 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM PAGE: 9 COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: GLENVIEWE LEMENTARYSC HOOL !GRADEi I TOTAL I WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC I PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 321 2 I 2 I 71 20 I OI OI OI OI OI 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 191 11 31 51 91 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 181 01 01 81 101 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 291 61 31 121 Bl 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 321 21 2 I 15 I 13 I OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 321 21 11 121 161 01 01 01 01 01 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 1621 131 111 591 761 11 01 01 01 01 2 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- /7 0 / ? g 0 r C\u0026gt; C, r, f-\"\") /77 /3 /__\n2 ~7 g~ I e:\u0026gt; c) D 0 ._S)._, _.\nA9 /9/ a LEA: 6002057 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 11 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: INDIAN HILLS ELEMENTARYSC HOOL I GRADEi I TOTAL I WHITE M F BLACK M F I ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! 751 281 301 71 81 11 01 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 201 91 101 01 01 01 01 11 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI 94 I 38 I 33 I 71 141 11 11 0 I OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 21 21 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI 921 301 331 151 121 01 11 01 11 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 21 21 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI 821 291 301 81 101 21 11 01 21 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 881 311 321 71 151 01 01 11 21 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI 771 311 281 101 51 21 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01,.,_1~01 Old~ 01 01 l1 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+- .I!-----+' --+-----+-----+-----+-- --+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- \"b1- ENROLLI 5081 1871 1861 541 641 61 41 21 51 01 0 ~ ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 7' CHOICE I 251 141 101 01 01 01 01 11 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002058 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM PAGE: 13 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: LAKEWOOEDL EMENTARYSC HOOL !GRADEi !TOTAL! WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ !AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISL!ALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! 591 161 251 41 111 11 21 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 51 11 41 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 641 161 271 71 111 11 21 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! OJ 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 621 221 231 61 91 21 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 691 171 281 121 101 01 21 01 01 OJ 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 11 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL! 561 191 121 91 111 11 31 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 OI 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 511 201 141 101 61 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O ll'l1i O I O I O~ 0 I O I J~ 0 I O I O I O I 0 ---------+---r+-----+~----+-----+1----+-----+ ----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 3611 1101 1291 481 581 61 91 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 71 11 61 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002059 PUPIL ENROLLMENBTY SCHOOLF ORM PAGE: 15 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: POPLAR STREET MIDDLE SCHOOL I GRADEi I TOTALI WHITE M F BLACK M F I ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 OJ OJ 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 OJ OI 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 11 01 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLLI 6801 1161 1101 2011 2141 181 151 11 41 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 ~(,01 01,l)lt 01 01 ~ 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+~ ---+-----+~----+-----+:\u0026gt; --+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 6811 1161 1101 2011 2151 181 151 11 41 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002060 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM PAGE: 17 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: LYNCHD RIVE ELEMENTARYSC HOOL !GRADEi !TOTAL! WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ !AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISL!ALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 50 I 2 I 4 I 22 I 22 I OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 551 41 31 251 221 01 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 551 71 01 23 I 241 01 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 471 11 41 201 221 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL! 681 41 41 281 30! 21 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI 55 I 1 I 5 I 22 I 27 I OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 0 6 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLL! 01 01 01 Oi 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL! 330! 191 201 1401 1471 21 21 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- r // c\n. 0 / 0 0 0 LEA: 6002061 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM PAGE: 19 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: MEADOWPA RK ELEMENTARYSC HOOL I GRADEi I TOTALI WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC IPACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 331 4 I 11 151 131 0 I OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI 261 21 11 121 91 11 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI 281 21 31 111 121 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI ~91 31 41 161 251 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 311 31 31 101 131 01 01 11 11 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 281 21 21 141 101 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 ~Q 01 01 (LOOI 01 6 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-- 1-----+l:!.---+-----+J----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- /')_,,1- ENROLL! 1951 161 141 781 821 21 11 11 11 01 0 l::,\n, ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002063 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE SCHOOL: NO. HEIGHTS PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT ELEMENTARYSC HOOL PAGE: 21 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 I GRADEi ITOTALI WHITE M BLACK ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV F M F I M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 811 13 I 10 I 2 9 I 16 I 6 I 7 I OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 OJ OJ OJ 01 01 OJ 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 761 91 91 171 261 111 41 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI 611 91 31 201 181 31 81 01 OJ OJ 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 OJ OJ 01 OJ 01 01 OJ 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 611 111 31 201 201 51 21 01 OJ 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ OJ OJ 01 01 OJ 01 OJ 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL! 681 31 131 211 171 61 BJ 01 OJ 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI 821 191 71 201 231 71 61 OJ OJ OJ 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ 01 OJ OJ OJ 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 0 6 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ 01 OJ 01 01 OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLL! 01 OJ OJ 01 OJ 01 01 OJ OJ OJ 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 OJ 01 OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 0 8 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ OJ OJ 01 OJ OJ 01 01 OJ OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 4291 641 451 1271 1201 381 351 01 OJ OJ 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ OJ 01 01 01 01 OJ OJ OJ OJ 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ? .:5 7 0 LEA: 6002064 PUPIL ENROLLMENBTY SCHOOLF ORM COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 23 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: PARK HILL ELEMENTARYSC HOOL !GRADEi !TOTAL! M WHITE BLACK F M F ASIAN/ !AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISL!ALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! 65! 161 131 141 121 61 21 01 01 11 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 571 121 121 141 151 21 11 01 01 01 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 45! 91 161 111 61 01 31 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 49! 141 91 101 101 41 21 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL! 551 121 61 171 171 21 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 501 111 41 141 151 41 21 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 0I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLLI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- OB ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 0 I 0 I 'l 0 I 0 I ? 0 I 0 I -? .,/ 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ---------+--v-+-----+t~---+-----+i----+-----+ ----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL! 3211 741 601 801 751 181 111 01 01 11 2 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002065 PUPIL ENROLLMENBTY SCHOOLF ORM COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 25 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: PIKE VIEW ELEMENTARYSC HOOL I GRADEi I TOTALI WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! 761 81 121 271 251 01 21 11 01 01 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 11 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 851 81 91 391 271 11 01 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 01 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI 681 161 71 241 131 41 31 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI 461 111 71 101 141 11 31 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 471 71 51 201 141 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI 551 51 51 201 211 31 01 01 11 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 11 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 0 6 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+--- -+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I O I O I of) 0 I O I ,.f,,,\n0 I O I .\n~O I O I O I O I 0 ---------+---\nf-+-----+J----+-----+~~--+-----+-C--+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 3771 551 451 1401 1141 101 81 31 11 01 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 41 01 01 31 11 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002067 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENBTY SCHOOLF ORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 27 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: REDWOODPR E-SCHOOL I GRADEi I TOTALI WHITE M F BLACK M F I ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC IPACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 OI 01 01 DI 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 OJ 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI OI OI OI OJ OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI OI OI OJ OI OI OI OI O I OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 OI 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI O I OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 7 9 71 0 0 0 !I -n.,I\u0026lt; ,,,.,. ~,._/ !'ft J .. LEA: 6002069 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: SEVENTH STREET ELEM. SCHOOL PAGE: 29 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 I GRADEi I TOTAL I WHITE M BLACK ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV F M F M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! 601 01 01 261 321 21 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI 621 11 01 291 311 01 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 421 01 01 231 191 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 511 11 01 251 251 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 511 01 01 231 281 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 481 01 01 211 261 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL! 11 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 OI 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL! 3151 21 01 1481 1611 31 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- :5?0 G- 0 9 // C C (') 0 C'\u0026gt; :\n\u0026gt;~ ~ 1~7 /7~ -~ } r r\u0026gt; 0 _: ~:)7 .i/ LEA: 6002070 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 31 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: LAKEWOOMD IDDLE SCHOOL !GRADEi I TOTALI M WHITE F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 Oi 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI O I O ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 Oj 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 0 6 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI O ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLL! 3751 1211 1121 701 651 21 Si 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 OI 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL! 3481 1071 1111 621 641 31 11 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ---=~~==~l-.\nl----~l~~~l---_-~~l l-.-2-~-~~l~--l---~-l~--lJ--l~ l----~+---- l,7. ENROLL! 7231 2281 2231 1321 1291 Si 61 01 01 01 0 - ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002075 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 33 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: NLR HIGH SCHOOL-EAST CAMPUS I GRADEi ITOTALI WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLLI 11 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 11 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002075 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: NLR HIGH SCHOOL-EAST CAMPUS PAGE: 34 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 I GRADEi I TOTALI WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 09 ENROLLI 7191 1261 1551 2361 1761 121 101 21 21 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 21 01 01 21 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 10 ENROLLI 7111 1381 1531 2171 1771 121 91 41 11 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 21 01 11 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 11 ENROLLI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 12 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 13 ENROLLI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- EE ENROLLI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- SM ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ss ENROLLI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ---~~~=~~l--v\"\"'~l----~l~1~l----~l~1-~l----~l2~~l----~l----~~,.1,  ENROLLI 1431 I 264 I 308 I 454 I 353 I 241 19 I 6 I 3 I OI 0 ti\" ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 41 01 11 21 11 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ******************************************************************************** NUMBERO F GRADUATESF OR PREVIOUS SCHOOLY EAR TOTAL ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- GRADUATEIS 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- Has your district voted to participate in School Choice? Y ******************************************************************************** LEA: 6002076 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: NLR HIGH SCHOOL-WESTC AMPUS PAGE: 36 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 I GRADEI I TOTALI WHITE M BLACK ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV F M F M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 09 ENROLLI 441 41 11 201 171 01 01 21 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 10 ENROLLI 1091 161 51 511 321 11 41 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 11 ENROLLI 6471 1511 1571 1551 1631 121 61 01 21 01 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 21 01 01 21 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 12 ENROLLI 5091 1241 1251 1181 1221 91 51 11 21 21 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 13 ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- EE ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- SM ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ss ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ---=~~==~l---)l----~l?..~~~l----~!tr~~-~l----~l:11\u0026gt;--~l----~l----~fl\"'7, ~~~~~~l-==~=l--===l--=~~l--=~~l--==~l---==l---==l----=CHOICEI 41 01 01 41 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ******************************************************************************** NUMBERO F GRADUATESF OR PREVIOUS SCHOOLY EAR TOTAL ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- GRADUATEIS 5251 1321 1641 951 1131 51 101 21 41 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- Has your district voted to participate in School Choice? Y ******************************************************************************** LEA: 6002077 PUPIL ENROLLMENBT Y SCHOOLF ORM PAGE: 37 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: ROSE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL !GRADEi !TOTAL! WHITE M F M BLACK F I ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 11 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL! 131 31 01 81 21 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLL! 1061 101 51 411 491 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL! 1021 91 41 441 451 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL! 2221 221 91 941 961 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002077 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENBTY SCHOOLF ORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: ROSE CITY MIDDLE SCHOOL PAGE: 38 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 I GRADEi !TOTAL! WHITE M BLACK ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV F M F M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 09 ENROLL! 31 01 01 31 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 10 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 11 ENROLLI 0 I 0 I 0 I OI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 12 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 13 ENROLLI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- EE ENROLLI 0 I 0 I OI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I O I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- SM ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ss ENROLLI 0 I OI OI 0 I 0 I OI 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 0 I 0 I ~ \\ 0 I 0 I J~~ 0 I 0 I I 0 I 0 I 0 I O I 0 I ---------+--v-+-----+~---+-----+ ----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 2251 221 91 971 961 11 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ******************************************************************************** NUMBERO F GRADUATESF OR PREVIOUS SCHOOLY EAR TOTAL ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- GRADUATEIS 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- Has your district voted to participate in School Choice? Y ******************************************************************************** LEA: 6002702 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENBTY SCHOOLF ORM SCHOOL CHOICE BY SCHOOL ON OCT. 1 PAGE: 39 SIS: rpt404 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: RIDGEROADC HARTERM IDDLE SCHOO JGRADEI JTOTALI WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ JAM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 OJ OJ 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! OJ 01 01 01 01 OJ 01 OJ 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI O I OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 OJ 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 01 01 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I OJ 01 OJ 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 0 6 ENROLLI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI OI 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI 2311 311 231 881 781 51 51 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL! 2801 211 251 991 1091 131 111 11 OJ 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+---r-+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICEI 01 01 001 OJ~\n, 01 01 2:.1 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+---./-+-----+1----+-----+9----+-----+7-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 5111 521 481 1871 1871 181 161 21 01 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002000 COUNTY: PULASKI PUPIL ENROLLMENTB Y DISTRICT SCHOOL CHOICE BY DISTRICT ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: PAGE: 1 SIS: rpt304 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:38 I GRADEi I TOTAL I ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ WHITE M F M BLACK F I HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- K ENROLL! 7641 1321 1261 2161 2431 271 141 21 01 11 3 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 371 161 191 11 01 01 01 11 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 01 ENROLL! 7451 1241 1251 2211 2411 191 131 11 01 01 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 31 21 01 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 02 ENROLL! 6721 1301 1161 2181 1761 101 181 21 11 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 31 21 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 03 ENROLL! 6971 1371 1231 1911 2151 161 131 01 21 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 01 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 04 ENROLL I 6991 118 I 1131 206 I 225 I 15 I 141 4 I 3 I 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 21 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 05 ENROLL! 6541 1181 881 2071 2091 201 101 01 11 01 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 31 11 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 06 ENROLL! 6951 1191 1101 2111 2161 181 151 11 41 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 07 ENROLLI 7121 1621 1401 1991 1921 81 101 11 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 08 ENROLL! 7301 1371 1401 2051 2181 161 121 11 01 11 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLL! 63681 11771 10811 18741 19351 1491 1191 121 111 51 5 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 501 231 221 31 11 01 01 11 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002000 PUPIL ENROLLMENBTY DISTRICT COUNTY: PULASKI SCHOOL CHOICE BY DISTRICT ON OCT. 1 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: PAGE: 2 SIS: rpt304 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:38 I GRADEi ITOTALI ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ WHITE M BLACK I HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV F M F M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 09 ENROLLI 7661 1301 1561 2591 1931 121 101 41 21 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 21 01 01 21 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 10 ENROLLI 820 I 154 I 158 I 268 I 2091 131 131 4 I 11 0 I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 31 01 11 11 11 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 11 ENROLLI 6471 1511 1571 1551 1631 12 I 61 01 21 01 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 21 01 01 21 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 12 ENROLLI 5091 1241 1251 1181 1221 91 51 11 21 21 1 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 11 01 01 11 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- 13 ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 OJ 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- EE ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- SM ENROLLI O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I O I 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ss ENROLLI 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ENROLLI 91101 17361 16771 26741 26221 1951 1531 211 181 71 7 ------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- CHOICE I 581 231 231 91 21 01 01 11 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+--jOf-+-----+--rr-+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- -r\np..,. J,) .... ,..,  11 \u0026amp;'b .q l' 7\"' 31P/1 ~ ~ 1:5 C? 0 0 0 1~ Has your district voted to participate in School Choice? Y ~ --1 ~.i/5! - .a / o7,,. 9-v1C::-r ,.. ~ ?(,, ..,~ ,\nrn I\n, '\u0026gt;\u0026lt;' ,\nJ. / I~ 7 7 A~ 7o ******************************************************************************** ~ f NUMBERO F GRADUATESF OR PREVIOUS SCHOOLY EAR TOTAL ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- GRADUATEIS 5251 1321 1641 951 1131 51 101 21 41 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- ******************************************************************************** LEA: 6002050 PRESCHOOLE NROLLMENTB Y SCHOOL PAGE: 1 SIS: rpt455 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: AMBOYE LEMENTARYSC HOOL I GRADEi I TOTAL I M WHITE F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- PK ENROLL! 211 41 41 71 61 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002054 COUNTY: PULASKI PRESCHOOL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL PAGE: 3 SIS: rpt455 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: BOONE PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I GRADEi I TOTAL I WHITE M F BLACK M F CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- PK ENROLLI 541 21 21 241 231 21 11 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002056 COUNTY: PULASKI PRESCHOOL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL PAGE: 5 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: GLENVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I GRADEi I TOTAL I WHITE M F BLACK M F SIS: rpt455 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- PK ENROLLI 171 01 11 81 81 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002060 COUNTY: PULASKI PRESCHOOLE NROLLMENBT Y SCHOOL PAGE: 9 SIS: rpt455 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: LYNCHD RIVE ELEMENTARYSC HOOL I GRADEi I TOTALI M WHITE F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- PK ENROLLI 201 21 01 11 I 61 01 11 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002063 PRESCHOOL ENROLLMENT BY SCHOOL PAGE: 11 SIS: rpt455 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: NO. HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I GRADEi I TOTAL I WHITE M F BLACK M F ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- PK ENROLL! 411 41 31 121 81 51 91 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002067 PRESCHOOLE NROLLMENTB Y SCHOOL PAGE: 14 SIS: rpt455 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 COUNTY: PULASKI DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: REDWOODP RE-SCHOOL I GRADEi I TOTAL I WHITE M F BLACK M F I ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- PK ENROLL! 2131 71 91 991 871 71 41 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- LEA: 6002069 COUNTY: PULASKI PRESCHOOLE NROLLMENTB Y SCHOOL PAGE: 15 SIS: rpt455 CYCLE: 10/15/2004 RUN: 10/15/2004 10:39 DISTRICT: N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL: SEVENTH STREET ELEM. SCHOOL I GRADEi I TOTAL I WHITE M F BLACK M F I ASIAN/ 1AM INDIAN/ HISPANIC !PACIFIC ISLIALASKAN NTV M F M F M F ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- PK ENROLLI 201 01 01 91 111 01 01 01 01 01 0 ---------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+---- r 0 C') _ .. C2 :a :-c: Set.cc: :-o:. 54 ::02 C:-ysc.a: r:1.:: :\"lag::.e: z:em ?K K School :-oc ocs 3ay::n.:. -1ec:::: c:eme!:tar~ K Sc::.ccl :-::~ K 24 ,8 26 23 ,5 30 19.1 :o ,o :c 35 22 30 3:\n: :s 29 208 :as !.2 :o 54 5 5 35 5) !.S 32 32 32 20 23 :s :a 23 23 :s 29 25 42 32 36 :5 :so 9 :2 - - ~e 1c6 -P'6 -- -I SC 35 s 3- 29 25 26 :a 23 :9 :as - 19 :.3 11 # 1:: 33 24 2G 29 33 ,, ?fr?) :!.\"'3 ,, :2 ~\\ 43 1 p ,~ .\n-l :s 2 C 2 s 5 0 4\n: C.o 0 JS 4:\n: 26 3- ,5 ,6 ./ 235 ..... 52. 2-t \\ :ss 5\nEO ~1 ' :.22 1:5 :cs 1:2 95 9- 95 S:4 -54 61 48 4E 63 59 65 70 -2 63 ...,.... 3 93 24 26 24 33 42 49 48 --, 2E\\v ,-, 66\\ 49 ,H 50 74\\ \u0026lt;, 33\\- K PK K !?K K Sc::cc:. Tot :-c.:. :r:c:.ud.:.ng PK Schee::. '!'c,:.. 'rot :::c~'.lC:.r:g ?K School :'oc . !.3 ,\nacks:mv:::e ::::::.ement.:i.r:1 3 13 11 57 13 10 9 14 aG 78 55 2E 26 24 29 21 25 o'I. 13 10 ::..1 16 205 16 13 23 16 18 12 34 10 6 5 11 7 10 5\" 50 20 21 22 n 15 d-.,Y:20 Sc ::.i. 20 11 83 55 55 sa 158 32 24 20 2- 20 24 13 20 :.12 12 5 :3 ::.a 28 24 14 23 12:\n~I ::..s 20 13 16 79 43 51 14 6 14 :o 8 l\" :..o 14 :\n_7 18 19 !.C 9 101 20 :.s :s 60 EJ () 55 53 71 36 40 56 242 252 735\"\"\" 38 44 JS 34 27 28 242  206 51 52 54 56 3 c 3 .....- 54. :.si : 9 :::\nil 7., -a 54 54 34 79 a- 545 V 526 55 91% 4.5.85% 16 50% ,c 2 5 %- 48 26% ?K K 60 62 :o 3: :2 !.'.) -- 1: !.S 62 JS (l a'i \\\\le oC s 5 5 4 ze a 7 ~5 25 :5 :a 9 31 :. s (I 2: :2 6 0 2\n/t 52 ,a 4c 48 50 50 4C 53 :\nos.,...\ns ,a 43 4- 35 4\" ~as  -5 54 5.\n4'J .\n6\n: ::: :\n:a::ec::: #1- .:\n56'  ,, :s, 20 2:1 V ~~7-- 25.5:\\.,,,,,. 74. 3 S \\ '.7i7~ 1\n- . :4 _., o: : 5 ?:.. K ?!\u0026lt; 22 :s SC~OC..1. Toe. s, :o 30 13 56 36 23 ~1:::- :: .-i.\n..:.z ='='.:-1.\n:..z :. 9 :a 63 50 .\ns ,2 39 2Z3 :a :s 42 :.J 53  59 50 52 \"= ZO\\: V 7- 38 SC\\ 6: SC% oo Jat ...., 69 92 \\ ,,. 95\\ 59 05% 56 95\\ .. __ a:t .,,.., ?K 55 6J 59 20 20 34 23 3C 2: 1 6 :s 45 55 6'J 53 s::: 26 3C :a :9 :.s 96 cs 239 2S 25 20 22 :s 69 2J-t 50 6J :s : 0 {6 _, 26 L, 66 53 62 -J sa s:. 63 55 E: 3-.\n, ...... 259 305 ... CSO V 71 :6.6H -2 ~\u0026lt;\u0026gt;/- :n ::J :~s :. as 5-i2 V 5,C 69 56 63\n7\\ 4- 5: t ?K K ... c!:co_ ':I- - ..... a:. c4 3C 43 30 JS J (I 24 :se 35 35 _6! ,2 :s :s -6 66 49 JS .\n3 89 34 0.3 52 ... 66 0 I 59 o- ES a, 58 15 :s 4 3 2C 69 55 204 )40 062 :_4 S 53 sa 3-:, ? . .:..,:\n::\nsa \u0026amp;ct sa S4\\ 55 ......, 44 40\\ 63 32\\: ,o\nst :s /t'rr\"  tj ! ( ~.f.t, .d-'('ot- 0 I , /4r:?-- A ~,9.J.// --r..,I:. , 32\n: 9\n:3 :E :5 2J 25 :.2 9 #9t/ -::t\ns\n). '5~ ~1\n.,,,1 -1{90~ -t~ ~ 93 !?9 as 96 550 io17? ~I~/ ~7?-. ...y'\ne . ' 286 266 2cz: 259 :ss ?K 455 39:Z 3 94 364 440 29 2.\n:c 0 32 28 3:. 13 :a J' 2 ! 42 5 :352 138~ :320 lG435 :.3449 4l 56% 60 39% 50 95\\ ~ L\\\\I PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT October 22, 2004 Horace Smith, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Mr. Smith: 925 East Dixon Road/P.O. Box 8601 Little Rock, Arkansas 72216-8601 ( 501) 490-2000 Attached is the October 1, 2004, enrollment counts for Pulaski County Special School District and the 2004-2005 School Profiles. Guidelines for racial balance for the 2004-2005 school year are: 20-50% at the elementary level and 20-54% at the secondary level. Pre-K enrollment is not included in the elementary racial balance guidelines. Sincerely, Dr. Brenda Bowles, Director of Equity and Multicultural Education c Dr. Don Henderson, Superintendent of Education Karl Brown, Assistant Superintendent for Equity and Pupil Services Sam Jones, Attorney PulaskCi ountyS peciaSl chooDl istrict Equity and Pupil Services Date: To: Fax:: Re: - - -- --  .   -  -- --- - - 925 E. Dixon Rd/P.O. Box 8601 Little Rock, Arkansas 72216 (501) 490-6215 (501) 490- 1352 Fax FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET rJ O( ) Q. rh-- k r J_ /\n2 () 0 l-/ 3'71-0100 Sender: 'r' c.. )e__ .. YOU SHOULD RECEIVE 1 [ PAGE (S), INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET. IF YOU T MESSAGE: DO NOT RECEIVE AU THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL (501) 490-6215. PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT November 2, 2004 925 East Dixon Road/P.o Box 8601 little Rock, Arkansas 72216-8601 Horace Smith, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Mr. Smith\n(501) 490-2000 Attached is a copy of the Pulaski County Special School District Summary of Building Capacities and Enrollments for 2002-2003. Building capacity remained Pthuel assakmi Hei gehx cSecphto foorl. RobinsonH igh School, RobinsonM iddle Schoola nd North , Robinson High School building capacity has increased from 770 to 780, additional capacity provided by the portable building that was installed at 8R3o0b.i nson High School in January 2004 increasedt he building capacity to  Robinson Middle School building capacity based on changes at the school 6d7u0ri.n g the summer of 2004 has increasedt he building capacity to 650 to  North Pulaski High School building capacity based on changes at the fsrcohmo o1l 0d5u0ri tnog 1th0e6 0s.u mmer of 2004 has increasedt he building capacity Sincerely, Vi\u0026gt; A,,,,_)._,__ B,-,vt~ Dr. Brenda Bowles, Director of Equity and Multicultural Education c Karl Brown, Assistant Superintendent for Equity \u0026amp; Pupil Services Jar.nes Warren, Assistant Superintendent for Support Services SUMMARY OF BUILDING CA?AC!11ES AND ENROLLMENTS I Revised May 2. 200s PULASKl COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT I (APRIL 28. 2003) l I '  SCHOOL CAPACITY ' RE.COMMENDED I 2002-2003 I INFORMATION I SCHOOi.. CAPACITY ' I ENROLLMENT\"! (jAN, 7, 2003 SHEET), (A?RIL 28, 2003 INFO) HIGH SCHOOLS ' I I I I JA.CKSONVILLE HIGH (10-12) ' 825 I 1,025 I 1,360 (FOR S-12) 1,127 i I MILLS HIGH ' 908 I 780 I 1,130 NORTH PULASKI HIGH ' 626 I 900 I ,.ese I /Of\u0026amp;.0 OAK GROVE HIGH (M2) I 795 I 935 1,130 - I (FOR 9-12) I 537 I ,/ ROSINSON HIGH I :i94 I 556 I\ni:\ne '1 ii) 8.3 D u, , SYLVAN HILLS HIGH I 1,055 998 ! i,120 fDI'\"' I I I ! i MIDDl..E/JR. HIGHS I I ! I I I FULLER MIDDLE I 664 : 945 I 1,360 JACKSONVILLE JR. {8-9) I 620 I 800 I 990 JACKSOIIIVILLE MIDDLE (6-7) 1 643 I 800 I 980 NORTHWOOD MIDDLE I 651 I 964 1,030 - ROBINSON MIDDLE I 451 I 486 I 569 ~r,[) __ SYLVAN HILLS MIDDLE I 901 925 I 1,080 ' I I I ,\n,,\nI i:::LEMENTARY I I / I I I ADKINS ' I 216 I 370 526 ARNOLD DRIVE I 347 I ~o I 453 BAKER I 268 I 330 428 BATES I 612 I aoo I 863 BAYOU METO I 460 I 660 I 697 CATO 367 II 576 I 800 CLJNTON I 615 I 833 840 COLLEGE STATION I 212 I 340 439 CRYSTAL rilLL I 757 I 620 I 870 DUPREE I 310 : 465 498 HARRIS I 175 : 52.5 I 906 JACKSONVILLE 457 I 785 I 850 LANDMARK I 306 I 568 I n, LAWSON 242 I 325 I 372 OAK GROVE 385 i -476 I 626 I OAl\u0026lt;9RODKE I 309 I 500 553 PINE FORR.=sr ' 505 I 556 554 PINE'NOOD 410 I 523 I 677 ROBINSON I 387 450 I 544 1scon 108 I 280 I 294 $~:~WOOD I 355 I 460 I 561 SYLVAN HILLS 393 i 456 606 ,, 348 450 j 566 / T/l.Y_QR 570 I 561 _,::.. 10LESON I 342 I ,,r. - I I I ,,, 7 !:\nN?.OL.LMEN\nlN:--ORMATION BASED ON 3RD QUAR~R 2002-Z003 ~ROLLMENT :\u0026gt;A7E.0 MAR'.::rl 2\"\\, 2D03 :\nAGE 02 SUMMARY OF BUILDING CAPACmEs AND ENROLLMENTS ! Revised May 2. 2003 PULASKl COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT I (APRIL 28. 2003} ' SCHOOL CAPACl1Y 1 RECOMMENDED I 2002-2003 I INFORMATION I SCHOOL CAPACJTY !ENROLLMENT\" (JAN. 7. 2003 SHEET) (APRIL. 28, 2003 INFO) HIGH SCHOOLS I I I JACKSONVIUE HIGH (1012) 1 826 I 1.025 1.360 (FORS-12) I 1,127 ' I MILLS HIGH 908 780 I 1,130 NORTH PULASKI HIGH I 826 I 900 1,050 OAK GROVE HIGH (712) I 795 935 I 1.130 (FOR S-12) 537 I  I RO6INSON HIGH I 594 556 ! 770 SYLVAN HILLS HIGH 1.055 998 I 1,120 I I I MIDDLE/JR. HIGHS I I I I ' I FULLER MJDDLE ! 664 I 945 I 1,360 JACKSONVILLt\nJR. {6-9) I 620 I 800 I 990 JACKSONVILLE MIDDLE (6-7) I 643 I 800 I 980 NORTHWOOD MIDDLE I 651 I 964 I 1,030 R.OBINSON MIDDLE I 451 I 486 I 650 SYLV..o.NH ILLS MIDDLE I 901 I 925 I 1.080 I I I I I ELEMENTARY ' I I I I I ADKJNS . I 216 I 370 I 526 ' ARNOLD DRfVE I 347 I 420 I 453 BAKER I 268 I 330 I 428 BATES I 612 I 800 I 863 BAYOU METO 460 I 660 l 697 CATO I 367 ! 576 I 800 CLINTON I 615 I 833 840 COLLEGES i ATION I 212 I 340 I 43S CRYSTA l HILL I 757 I' 820 I 870 DUPREE I 310 I 465 I 498 HARRIS I 175 I 525 I 906 JACKSONVILLE I 467 I 785 I 850 LANDMARK I 306 I 568 ! 711 LAWSON I 242 I 325 I 372 OAK GROVE I 385 ' 476 I 626 OAKBROOK!:: 309 ! 500 553 PINE FORREST I 505 I 556 I 554 PINEWOOD I 410 i 523 I 677 ROBINSON I 387 ' 450 I 544- SCOTT I 108 I 280 I 294 SKE:RWOOD I 355 I 460 i 561 SYLVAN HILLS I 393 456 : 606 TAYLOR 348 I 450 I 566 TOLLESON I 342 I 570 ' 561 I I ! I : ITENROL.L.M:=1N I NFO?..M~.noN BASED oN 3RD ouAR-:-ER I \\ 2002-2003 ENROLLMENT DATED MAR.CH 21, 2003 I fl -r.\n-~ ~~ ~- ~//.4\":J - - /d,\u0026gt;-.J /~ /$0. (5 /7.,/4 -\n:\u0026gt; -0: %: Gf .\n)- ~f Z_  __\ns,A,l{ ) - ~.- \"-1/ ( ,Yf 0- C,,diJ() ~r7 ~0/Y) ~~u /~9~2 ~~ AJJ._l(_~v . ~-=\u0026lt;. 4' //2~-~ /4/S0 -a- ~~ -=5ff2 ?:9--, t-'Abt. tl:.'./t:14 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT November 2, 2004 Horace Smith, Federal Monitor Office of Desegregation Monitoring 124 West Capitol Suite 1895 Little Rock,A R 72201 Dear Mr. Smith: 925 East Dixon Road/P.O. Box 8601 Little Rock, Arkansas 72216-8601 (501) 490-2000 Attached is a copy of the Pulaski County Special School District Summary of Building Capacities and Enrollments for 2002-2003. Building capacity remained Pthuel assakmi Hei gehx cSecpht ofoorl. Robinson High Schoo/, Robinson Middle School and North  Robinson High School building capacity has increased from 770 to 780, additional capacity provided by the portable building that was installed at 8R3o0b.i nson High School in January 2004 increased the building capacity to  Robinson Middle School building capacity based on changes at the school 6d7u0ri.n g the summer of 2004 has increased the building capacity to 650 to  North Pulaski High School building capacity based on changes at the school during the summer of 2004 has increased the building capacity from 1050 to 1060. Sincerely, (6 ~)_l_- BuvV!~ Dr. Brenda Bowles, Director of Equity and Multicultural Education c Karl Brown, Assistant Superintendent for Equity \u0026amp; Pupil Services James Warren, Assistant Superintendent for Support Services ~'-'!UJ. I y t-'Ut-' J.L ::,t.KV J.\\..,t. n.,:::,::,v t-'LAN DDPT SUMMARY OF BUILDING CAPACTTlES AND ENROLLMENTS Revised May 2. 200~ PULASK1 COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (APRIL 28. 2003) I SCHOOL CAPACITY RECOMMENDl:D 20022003 I INFORMATION SCHOOi. CAPACITY ENROLLMENT\"' (JAN. 7. 2003 SHEET) (APRIL 28, 2003 INFO) HIGH SCHOOLS I JACKSONVILLE HIGH {10-12) 825 1,025 1.360 (FOR .9-12) 1,127 MILlSHIGH 908 780 1,130 NORTH PULASKI HIGH 826 900 1,050 OAK GROVE HIGH (712} 795 935 1,130 (FOR 9-12) 537 ROBINSON HIGH ~94 556 770 SYLVAN HILLS HIGH 1,056 998 1,120 MIDDJ...E/JRH. IGHS FULL.ER MIDDLE I 664  I 945 1.360 JACKSONVILLE JR. {8--9) I 620 800 990 JACKSONVILLE MIDDLE (6-7) 643 I 800 980 NORTHWOOD MIDDLE: I 651 964 1,030 ROBINSON MIDDLE 451 486 650 SYLVAN HILLS MIDDLE 901 925 1,080 I I ELEMENTARY I ADKINS ' 216 370 526 ARNOLD DRIVE 347 420 453 BAKER 268 330 428 BATES 612 aoo 863 BAYOU METO I 460 660 697 CATO 367 576 I 800 CLJNTON I 615 833 T 840 COLLEGE STATION I 212 340 I 439 CRYSTAL HILL 757 820 870 DUPREE I 310 465 498 HARRIS 175 I 525 906 JACKSONVILLE 487 785 850 LO.NDMARK 306 568 711 LAWSON I 242 325 sn OAK GROVE I 385 I 476 626 OAKBROOKE I 309 500 553 PINE FORREST I 505 556 554 PINEWOOD ' 410 I 523 I o77 ROBINSON I 387 I 450 544 SCOTT I 108 I 280 294 SHERWOOD I 355 I 460 561 SYLVAN HILLS I 393 i 456 I 606 450 566 TAYLOR 348 570 561 TOLLESON I 342 I \"ENROLLMENT INFORMATION BASED ON 3RD QUARTER 2002-2003 ~ROLLMENT DATED tMRCH 21, 2003 t-'AGE 04/04 PAGE 02 _...,...,' ...-. , ...,..., C:.l\u0026gt;!UJ. I 'i l'\"'Ut\"' lL ::it.t-\u0026lt;V 1\\.-t. ,--._\n~.L) P!...AN DDFT SUMMARY OF BUILDING CAPACmES AND ENROLLMENTS I Revised May 2. 2003 PULASKl COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT I {APRIL 28. 2003) I '. SCHOOL CAPACl1Y RECOMMENDED 2002-2003 I INFORMATION SCHOOL CAPACITY I ENROLLMENT*' (JAN. 7. 2003 SHE:ETJ I (APRIL 28. 2003 INFO) HIGH SCHOOLS I I JACKSONVILLE HIGH (1012) 1 826 1.025 1.360 (FOR 9-12) 1,127 MILLS HIGH 908 ' 780 1,130 NORTH PULASKI HIGH 826 900 1.050 OAK GROVE HIGH (7-12) 795 935 1,130 (FOR S-12) 537 ROBINSON HIGH 594 556 770 SYLVAN HILLS HIGH 1,055 998 1,120 I MIDDLE/JR. HIGrlS I FULLER MIDDLE I 664 I 945 1,360 JACKSONVILLE JR.. {8-9) I 620 800 990 JACKSONVILLE MIDDLE (6-7) I 643 800 980 NORTHWOOD MIDDLE 651 964 1,030 ~OBINSON MIDDLE 451 486 650 SYLVAN HILLS MIDDLE 901 925 1,080 I ELEMENTARY ADKINS  I 216 370 I 526 ' ARNOI..D DRIVE 347 420 453 BAKER 268 330 428 BATES 612 800 863 BAYOUMETO I 460 660 697 CATO 367 576 800 CLINTON i 615 833 840 COLLEGE STATION 212 340 I 439 CRYSTAL HILL 757 820 870 DUPREE 310 465 498 HARRIS 175 I 525 906 JACKSONVILLE 487 785 850 LANDMARK 306 568 711 LAWSON 242 325 372 OAK GROVE 385 I 476 626 OAKBROOKE I 309 500 553 PINE FORREST 505 556 554 PINEWOOD I 410 523 677 ROBINSON 387 450 544 SCOTT 108 I 280 294 SKE'.RWOOD 355 i 460 561 SYLVAN HILLS I 393 I 456 606 TAYLOR 348 450 566 TOLLESON I 342 570 561 ' ! \"ENROLLMENT !NFORMAnON BASE:D ON 3RD QUARTER 2002-2003 ENROLLMENT DATED MAF{CH 21, 2003 t-'AGE 03/04 PAG:: 02\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1090","title":"\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2004-10"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","Little Rock School District","Education--Arkansas","Education--Economic aspects","Education--Evaluation","Education--Finance","Educational law and legislation","Educational planning","Educational statistics","School board members","School boards","School improvement programs","School superintendents"],"dcterms_title":["\"Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting\" agenda"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1090"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThis transcript was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nAgenda OCT ? ~UU't OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION foONITORfNG Little Rock School District Board of Directors' Meeting OCTOBER 2004 RECEIVED OCT 2 , 2004 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION r, ONITORING ,... n-,:, .\u0026gt;\n,m:J r- rr..-. :-11: Oz o\u0026gt; ~~ m..,\n,::, C: -z\n,::,n o-\u0026lt; r- i5 r-z nu, ~ !\"' n ::::\n!='~ r- z\n,::, u, n\n,::, -\u0026lt; m \u0026gt;~ !ll u, I. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM STREET LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS REGULAR MEETING October 28, 2004 5:30 p.m. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS A. Call to Order B. Roll Call II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS 111. A. Welcome to Guests B. Student Performance - Parkview Madrigals REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS/PUBLIC COMMENTS: A. Superintendent's Citations B. Partners In Education - New Partnerships Franklin Elementary- Ethel Dunbar and Carolyn Gray Fellowship Bible Church - Ray Williams Pulaski Heights Middle School - Dan Whitehorn Arkansas Department of Health - Maria Jones McClellan Magnet High School - Larry Buck and Carol Overton Gifts in Kind - Little Rock - Pamela Boles C. Remarks from Citizens (persons who have signed up to speak) D. Little Rock Classroom Teachers Association IV. REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS: A. Remarks from Board Members B. Student Assignment Report C. Budget Update D. Construction Report: Proposed Bond Projects E. Internal Auditors Report F. Technology Update ,.. n.., .\u0026gt;\nma ,,-- ,_.... :i: Oz o\u0026gt; El~ m..,\na C: -z\nan o,--i\u0026lt;5 r-z C')V, ~ .\u0026gt; ~.., \"'O .C.,:\n..a.. :-'!!! n::a :::im \u0026gt;n .... 8 Oz z=I \"'o z \"' Regular Board Meeting October 28, 2004 Page 2 V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. XI. APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MATTERS: A. Minutes - Regular Meeting: 09-23-04 - Special Meeting: 10-14-04 SCHOOL SERVICES A. Second Reading: Policy JIH - Student Searches HUMAN RESOURCES A. Personnel Changes BUSINESS SERVICES DIVISION: A. Donations of Property 8. Financial Report CLOSING REMARKS: Superintendent's Report: 1. Dates to Remember 2. Special Functions EMPLOYEE HEARINGS ADJOURNMENT 0-0 \u0026gt; ,m:, r,..-. r_-\u0026lt; E Oz o\u0026gt; el~ m..,\nx, C: -z\nx,O o-\u0026lt; r- l5 r-z 0 V, ~ ~\n= m-o 1\n:x, og Em me - C: ~~ cS ~\nx,::1 ~m z\nx, 0 V, m- \u0026gt;~ i,, c3 -Co:\n..x.., ~5!? o\nx, :::im \u0026gt;o -\u0026lt;8 Oz Z:::i V, 0 z V, I. PRELIMINARY FUNCTIONS CA.LL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL II. PROCEDURAL MATTERS/ WELCOME/ PERFORMANCE Ill. REPORTS/RECOGNITIONS A. SUPT. err ATIONS C. CITIZENS REMARKS 0. LRCTA LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: October 28, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Partners in Education BACKGROUND: The Little Rock School District Partners in Education program is designed to develop strong relationships between the community and our schools. The partnership process encourages businesses, community agencies and private organizations to join with individual schools to enhance and support educational programs. Each partnership utilizes the resources of both the school and the business for their mutual benefit. RATIONALE: The following schools and businesses have completed the requirements necessary to establish a partnership and are actively working together to accomplish their objectives. FUNDING: Not applicable. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that the board approve the following partnerships: Franklin Elementary and Fellowship Bible Church Pulaski Heights Middle School and Arkansas Department of Health McClellan Magnet High School and Gifts in Kind-Little Rock PREPARED BY: Debbie Milam, ViPS Director !I' !!l C: 0 m ~ \u0026gt; gi ci z !C m .z.. . fl a, C: 8 !!l C: ~ m !=' (\") 0z Ill ,X,. ~ X Franklin Elementary School \u0026amp; Fellowship Bible Church Education Partnership 2004-2005 School Year Fellowship Bible Church will: l. Complete facility and campus projects as prioritized by Franklin Elementary School for ShareFest 2004. 2. Seek to provide at least 30 STEP Encouragers. 3. Provide a teacher appreciation event to support and encourage the faculty and staff. 4. Partner with the PTA to strengthen and encourage increased parental involvement. 5. Provide speakers and support to student recognition events. Franklin Elementary School will: 1. Make available selected student art for display at Fellowship Bible Church. 2. Recognize Fellowship Bible Church as a Partner-in-Education in monthly school newsletters and at school functions. 3. Provide promotion and facility for parent life skills classes. 4. Enlist interested students to correspond with Fellowship selected International Partners. Pulaski Heights Middle School and Arkansas Department of Health Education Partnership 2004-2005 School Year Pulaski Heights Middle School will:  Provide artwork for the Arkansas Department of Health employee break room  Provide use of its facility for functions/ceremonies  Participate in the annual Christmas program  Allow its Spanish students to participate in Christmas caroling at the Department Arkansas Department of Health will:  Provide tutors for PHMS' after school program  Allow students enrolled in Career Orientation to job shadow employees  Organize a school supply drive for students that need supplies !I' !!l C: C .~....  g: iz5 I: zm ..... ~ n 0 z V, McCLELLAN MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL THE ACADEMIES: BUSINESS FINANCE, ENGINEERING, MULTIMEDIA PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT GIFIS AND KIND will provide on-going:  Supplies for families of McClellan students in need.  Incentives for volunteers promoting student achievement at McClellan.  Incentives for outstanding student performance at the nine weeks for McClellan to motivate students to achieve high standards.  Door-prizes for the PTSA meetings to get parents involved in promoting student achievement at McClellan.  Service-learning/community service opportunities for students to promote student achievement at McClellan. MCCLELLAN MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL will provide:  Free community education multimedia classes for two Gifts in Kind employees (if the class makes).  Inclusion of Gifts in Kind in McClellan's volunteer resource book.  Desktop Publishing services to Gifts in Kind.  Recognition at PTSA meetings for Gifts in Kind.  Recognition in the yearbook for Gifts in Kind.  Multimedia services for Gifts in Kind.  Students for community service/service learning opportunities for McClellan clubs and organizations at Gifts in Kind. 9417 Geyer Springs Road  Phone 447-2100  Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: BACKGROUND: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 October 28, 2004 Board of Directors Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools NCLB 2004 Update Junious Babbs The federal \"No Child Left Behind\" (NCLB} Act promotes educational choice by offering parents in low performing schools the opportunity to transfer to another school. LRSD has now completed the third year of implementation for this choice option. Attached report information notes 2004-05 results and provides a three year comparison since the 2002-03 school year. Request to void 6 approved NCLB transfers were received from parents. All request were granted and changes are reflected in the charts below. LRSD NCLB APPLICATION SUMMARY - OCTOBER 2004 APPROVED/ ACCEPTED APPLICATIONS BY SENDING SCHOOLS SCHOOL TOTAL Bale 1 Baseline 4 Brady 5 Chicot 3 Cloverdale Elem. 5 Fair Park 2 Franklin 4 Kinq 1 Mitchell 1 Rockefeller 5 Stephens 3 Wakefield 3 Washinqton 1 Watson 8 Wilson 5 Woodruff 4 TOTAL 55 :c::\na \u0026gt;- o~ ~~ ~! (/J ..... f\u0026gt; ti! C: C C) !!l C: ~ m m\na (/J !=' n 0 z !!l rn ~ C ::\n0 ~\na m \"C 0 :l APPROVED/ ACCEPTED APPLICATIONS BY RECEIVING SCHOOLS SCHOOL TOTAL Dodd 6 Geyer Springs 1 Mabe Iva le 5 Meadowcliff 1 Otter Creek 5 Romine 5 Western Hills 5 Forest Park 3 Fulbright 3 Jefferson 4 McDermott 6 Pulaski Heights 6 Rightsell 4 Terry 1 TOTAL 55 Applications Mailed 9-24-04 4364 students eligible for transfer (Bale, Baseline, Brady, Chicot, Cloverdale, Fair Park, Franklin, King, Mitchell, Rockefeller, Stephens, Wakefield, Washington, Watson, Wilson, Woodruff) Applications Received (10-1-04 5:00 p.m.) 69 ( .02%) Applications Approved 61 (88%) 6 Declined 55 Accepted Students report to \"Receiving School\" site on October 25, 2004. \"NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND\" 3 YEAR SUMMARY 2002-03 2003-04 Applications Mailed 3323 7619 Applications Received 202 128 (6%) (1.7%) Applications Approved 135 72 (67%) (56%) 2004-05 4364 69 (1.6%) 61 (88%) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: October 28, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: October 2004 Construction Report - Bond Projects BACKGROUND: The renovation and media additions at Pulaski Heights Middle and Elementary Schools are complete except for a punch list (discrepancies) that has been developed by the architect. Shelving for the media center has been installed, and the books are in place. The classroom and cafeteria additions at Parkview have been completed and are being used by students and staff. The new field house is nearing completion and should soon be in operation, pending installation of the gas line to the facility. The renovation of Scott Field has begun. The renovation is a partnership between LRSD and UALR. When completed in March 2005, UALR will use the track as part of their athletic program. RATIONALE: Monthly reports are submitted to the Board to keep members up-to-date on construction projects in the District. FUNDING: Bond Funds RECOMMENDATION: Report item\nno action necessary. PREPARED BY: Bill Goodman, District Engineer .:.n. Pl ::c C: ~ m ~ 1\"::c .., C: m~\n,c z is\n,c zm zu, mo .... C: ~ m Cl) CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD OCTOBER 28, 2004 BOND PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION I I t:st. 1.\nompIet1on Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Administration HVAC $70,000 Oct-04 Brady ___ Addition/renovation - ~-- $973,6~ _ _Q_ct-04 1-C_e_n_tral _____ --~Renovation - Interior ~ $10,200,266 Aug-05 Central HVAC Renovation - Band Area__ _ ~ $225,000 Dec-04 Dodd Fire Alarm Upgrade ____ $9,200 Oct-04 Dunbar _ R enovation/addition -___ ___ $6,149,023 Nov-04 Henderson MablevaleElem ~ Lockers- ---+--- $43,854 Dec-04 --Fire Alarm Upgrade -- - $12,000 Oct-04 Parkview - Addition _____ ~ $2,121 ,226- Oct-04 Pulaski Hgts. Elem Renovation -- - - $1 ,193,259- - Oct-04 Pulaski Hgts. MS -- - Renovation -- ___ _._ $3,755,041 Oct-04 Scott Field --~Track Renovations -- --- $289,056 Dec-04 -W-a-ke- fi-1eld- Rebuild - - - -- - $5,300,000 Oct-04 Washington Western Hills ___F1_ re Alarm Upgrade __ _: :::: $11]oa -- Oct-04 Fire Alarm Upgrade $8,400 Oct-04 BOND PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION - FALL/ WINTER 2004-05 I I t:st. 1.\nompIe1Ion Facility Name Project Description Cost Date Carver Media Center Expansion $167,490 Unknown Fair Park Roof _____ $245,784 Jan-05 Gibbs --,._ddition -- _______________ $705,670 Jun-05 Meadowcliff Remodel __ $164,150 Mar-05 Mitchell IRenovation ___ $2,212,493 Aug-05 Oakhurst (Adult Education) New Windows ________ $215,000 Jun-05 Wilson HVAC for Cafeteria $56,000 Jan-05 BOND PROJECTS PLANNING STARTED CONST. DATE TO BE DETERMINED Facility Name I I 1:sc. 1..,ompIe11on Project Description Cost Date Chicot Electrical Upgrade ____________U_ n_kn_o_w_n_ ___U_ n_kn_o_w_n, !Electrical Upg~rad-e ---------+, -- Unknown Unknown Booker CI over da Ie Elem_e_n_ta_r~y ---.-A~.d...,d~i.t..i.o,_n_ __________- -,... __.$ .c.5_2_0__,,_7_5_0_ ___A _u,g._-_0-51 Fair Park Addition $799,000 Unknown Forest Heights I Remodel $1,547,000 Unknown Garland Remodel Unknown Unknown Pulaski Hgts. MS Energy monitoring system installation Unknown Unknown Rightsell Renovation I $2,494,000 Aug-06 Scott Field Renovate Track $200,000 Unknown Western Hills I Electrical Upgrade \u0026amp; HVAC $640,000 I Aug-05 Woodruff Parking addition $193,777 Unknown BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name I I Est. Completion Project Description Cost Date Administration Administration -- !Asbestos abatement $380,495 Mar-03 Fresh air system $55,000 Aug-03 Administration Fire alarm $32,350 Aug-03 Administration A- n-nex - -~,-E-ne_r_gy_m_o_n-ito- r-in_g_s_y-ste_m_i_n-st_a_lla-t-io_n_--+_ ---~-----M~ay~ 02__, Alternative Learnin_g_c=-t-r_--=Ene_r=gy~m-o-n\"i\"t\"o- r-icn-~g-s~y-st,.e..-m\"\"'i-n\"s\"t'-a,l,l-a...t.,i,.o.._n_-+----$=-1,...5.,,.,.. 1.,..6,,...0.,-,-----cOCc\"\"~t:.o,,-.11 Alternative Learning Ctr. Energy efficient lighting $82,000 Dec-01 Badgett ----+-P--ar-ti~a~la_s_b_e-st_os~a~ba- t~e~m-e-nt------+----$23_7~,2- 3-7~----J-u-1--0-1-, Badgett !Fire alarm $18,250 Aug-02 Bale Classroom addition/renovation $2,244,524 I Dec-02 Bale Energy monitoring system Mar-02 Bale I Partial roof replacement $269,587 ' Dec-01 Bale HVAC I $664,587 Aug-01 CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD OCTOBER 28, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED I I 1Es t. Completion Facility Name Project Descriotion Cost Date Baseline ___ Renovation __ ___ $953,520 Aug-04 Booker Gym Roof ____ $48,525 Oct-04 Booker ADA Rest rooms___ ~ $25,000 ' -- Aug-04 Booker --Energy efficient lighting -- ~ - $170,295 ~ Apr-01 1-B-o_o_k-er______ --rnergy monitoring system installation ~ $23,710 Oct-01 Booker Asbestos abatement -~~---- ~ - $10,900 ~ 1-B,--o_o_k-er ________ Fire alarm $34,501 Mar-02 Brady Energy efficient lighting - ---~ - $8(),593 -- Sep-02 ,-~-~-ai - 1 ~~r---------+-~- ~~~\n0 ~i~i~~~i~\n~~stem installation ---,- $i~~:~~~ -- ~~ 1C-,-a-_rve_r_ _______P_ a_rking lot __-_ -_-- __ ~ $111 ,742 _ Au~ ,C_e_n_tr_al ________R_ efle_cting Pond __ ___ ____ $57,561 _ Sep-04 Central Parking Student parking ___ _ _ $174,000 Aug~ Central/Quig~ --S-tadium light repair \u0026amp; electrical repair $265,000 _c- Aug-03 Central/Quigley AthleticFleid Improvement ___ ___ $38,000 Aug-03 Central/Quigley Irrigation System ___ $14,500 Aug-03 Central ~ rchase land for school ______ Unknown Dec-02 Central --r--cR_o_of \u0026amp; exterior renovations 1 $2,000,000 I De~ ,_C_e_n_tr_al --------~C_e_ilin~g~a_n_d wall repair ______ $24,000 Oct:.Q.!_ Central Fire Alarm System Design/Installation $80,876 Aug__:_Q_!_ Cen_t_ra_l _______ _,.F_ro_n_t _la_n_din~g_ti_le_r_e~pai_r _ -----------.-- $22,470 Aug-01 ,_C_h_ic_o_t _______ --+-D_r_a_in_a=g_e______ 1 $64,700___ Aug-04 Chicot ____ ----'--S_ound Attenuation I $43,134 Jul-04 Cloverdale Elem. Energy efficient lighting I $132,678 ~ Cloverdale MS Energy efficient lighting ___ , $189,743 ___ Jul::Q_1_ Cloverdale MS Major renovation \u0026amp; addition i $1 ,393,822 Nov-02 Dodd ~ nergy efficient lighting I $90,665 - Au9.::Ql Dodd Asbestos abatement-ceiling tile I $156,299 Jul-01 Dodd Replace rooftop HVAC 1 $215,570 Aug~ Facilities Service Interior renovation I $84,672 ' Mar-01 Facility Services jFire alarm I $12,000 -- Aug-03 Fair Park IHVAC renovation/fire alarm I $315,956 Apr-02 f-F-_air_P_ark_____ _ !Energy efficient lighting I $90,162 Aug-01 Fair Park Asbestos abatement-ceiling~--- $59,310 , Aug-01 16 classroom addition \u0026amp; cafeteria/music J. A. Fair room addition $3,155,640 Aug-04 J. A. Fair Energy efficient lighting $277,594 Apr-01 J. A. Fair Press box I $10,784 Nov-00 J. A. Fair Security cameras I $12,500 , Jun-01 J. A. Fair 'Athletic Field Improvement $38,0QQ I Jul-03 J. A. Fair Irrigation System I $14,000 Jul-03 J. A. Fair Roof repairs I $391,871 Aug-03 Forest Park Replace window units w/central HVAC I $485,258 Nov-03 -- -- Forest Park Diagonal parking I $111 ,742 Aug-03 -- Forest Park Energy efficient lighting I $119,788 May-01 Fulbright - - -- E nergy efficient lighting I $134,463 ~ Fulbright -  Energy monitoring system installation _[_ $11,950 Aug-01 Fulbright Replace roof top HVAC units I $107,835 Aug-02 Fulbright - Parking lot - $140,000 - Sep-02 Fulbright Roof repairs I $200,000 Oct-02 Franklin Renovation I $2,511,736 , Mar-03 Geyer Springs 1 Roof Repair --- I $161,752 Jun-04 Gibbs Energy efficient lighting $76,447 Apr-01 Gibbs Energy monitoring system installation I $11 ,770 Jul-01 2 ~\n\u0026gt; :c -.::, C: ms\n:oz is\n:o zm zu, mo r- C: ~ m \"' rn \u0026gt; C: C :::\n0\n:o \"' ~  CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD OCTOBER 28, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name I Project Description I Cost I Est. Completion Date Hall ~ or renovation \u0026amp; addition $8,637,709 Sep-03 -- Hall Asbestos abatement I $168,222 Aug-01 Hall -- ~ rgy efficient lighting L $42,931 Jul-01 Hall Energy efficient lighting $296,707 Apr-01 Hall - Infrastructure improvements T- $93,657 __ Aug-01 Hall - Intercom I -Fe-b-01 Hall - - --Security cameras I $10,600 Jun-01 Energy efficient lighting $193,679 --- Henderson I Jul-01 Roof replacement gym - _I_ $107,835  - Henderson May-01 Henderson -- -- ~ sbestos abatement Phase I $500,000~ Aug-01 Asbestos abatement Phase 2 -- -1-- $250,000 Henderson -- Aug-02 IRC Energy efficient lighting I $109,136 Jul-02 Jefferson Asbestos abatement I $43,~ Oct-01 ---- Jefferson- - Renovation \u0026amp; fire alarm $1 ,630,000 Nov-02 _l:'arking lot -- ~ $269,588 - Laidlaw -- Jul-01 Energy monitoring system installation --ru-,150 -- Mabelvale Elem. Aug-01 Replace HVAC units -- - - $300,000 - Mabelvale Elem. I Aug-02 Mabelvale Elem. -- Asbestos Abatement $107,000 Aug-02 Energy efficient lighting - - - $106.~ - Mabelvale Elem. I Dec-02 Mabelvale MS Renovate bleachers -- $134,793 - Aug-01 Mabelvale MS Renovation $6,851 ,621 Mar-04 Mann Partial Replacement __ $11 ,500,00-0 - Apr-04 Mann Asphalt walks The total $1 .8 million Dec-01 Mann Walkway canopies is what has been Dec-01 Mann Boiler replacement , used so far on the -- Oct-01 Mann Fencing I projects listed Sep-01 Mann --Partial demolition/portable classrooms completed for Mann. Aug-01 McClellan Athletic Field Improvement $38,000 Jul-03 McClellan Irrigation System I $14,750 Jul-03 McClell-an -- - - _ ~ urity cameras - I $36,300 Jun-01 McClellan 1 Energy efficient lighting $303.~ - May-01 -- McClellan Stadium stands repair $235,ooo I Aug-01 McClellan Intercom $46,000 Feb-02 McClellan Classroom Addition I $2,155,622 Jul-04 McDermott 1 Fire Alarm Upgrade I $7,700 I Sep-04 McDermott 'Energy efficient lighting $79,411 I Feb-01 McDermott Replace roof top HVAC units $476,000 I Aug-02 -Me-adowcliff 1Fire alarm $16,175 Jul-01 Meadowcliff Asbestos abatement $253,412 Aug-02 Meadowcliff - - IEngergy efficient lighting - $88,297 Dec-02 Metropolitan 1 Replace cooling tower $37,203 Dec-00 Metropolitan - Replace shop vent system $20,000 May-01 Metropolitan Energy monitoring system installatio~ _ $17,145 Aug-01 Mitchell -- Building Remediation - $165,000 Jul-04 Mitchell Energy efficient lighting $103,642 1 Apr-01 Mitchell Energy monitoring system installation $16,695 Jul-01 -Mitchell Asbestos abatement I $13,000 Jul-01 Oa-khu-rst HVAC renovation $237,237 Aug-01 Otter Creek --- Energy monitoring system installation I $10,695 May-01 Otter Creek Energy efficient lighting I $81 ,828 Apr-01 -- Otter Creek Asbestos abatement $10,000 I Aug-02 Otter Creek Parking lot $138,029 I Aug-02 Otter Creek 6 classroom addition I $888,778 Oct-02 Otter Creek I Parking Improvements $142,541 Aug-03 3 CONSTRUCTION REPORT TO THE BOARD OCTOBER 28, 2004 BOND PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED Facility Name I Project Description Cost I Est. Completion Date Parkview HVAC controls - $210,000 Jun-02 Parkview Roof replacement $273,877 Sep-01 -- ~- - -Parkview Exterior lights $10,784 -- -N-ov-00 Parkview HVAC renovation \u0026amp; 700 area controls $301 ,938 ~ g-01 + Parkview Locker replacement $120,000 ___Au g-01 --- Parkview Energy efficient lighting $315,000 Jun-01 Procurement ~ rgy monitoring system installat~ $5,290 --- Jun-02 Procurement Fire alarm + - - $25,000 ~ g-03 Pulaski Hgts. Elem Move playground $17,000 Dec-02 -- Rightsell Energy efficient lighting - - - - $84,898 ~ -01 Rockefeller Energy efficient lighting $137,004 Mar-01 Rockefeller Replace roof top HVAC $539,175 ~ g-01 Parking addition ___ + Rockefeller $111 ,742 Aug-02 + - Romine Asbestos- a-batem-ent - $10,000 ~ pr-02 Romine Major renovation \u0026amp; addition - $3,534,675 Mar-03 -- Security{fransportation Bus cameras $22,500 Jun-01 Southwest Addition $2,000,000 Sep-04 - Southwest Asbestos abatement $28,138 Aug-00 Southwest 'New roof $690,000 Oct-03 Southwest Energy efficient lighting $168,719 Jan-02 Southwest i Drainage / street widening --,----- $250,000 - ~ g-03 Student Assignment Energy monitoring system installation $4,830 Aug-02 Student Assignment Fire alarm $9,000 Aug-03 Tech Center Phase 1 Renovation I $275,000 Dec-01 Tech Ctr / Metro Renovation Addition/Renovation - Phase II $3,679,000 Jun-04 Technology U~grade Upgrade phone system \u0026amp; data Nov-02 Terry 1 Energy efficient lighting I $73,850 Feb-01 Terry 1 Driveway \u0026amp; Parking $83,484 Aug-02 Terry - Media Center addition $704,932 Sep-02 Wakefield Security cameras $8,000 Jun-01 Wakefield 1 Energy efficient lighting I $74,776 Feb-01 Wakefield I Demolition/Asbestos Abatement $200,000 I Nov-02 Washington !Security cameras $7,900 Jun-01 Washington Energy efficient lighting $165,281 Apr-01 Watson I Energy monitoring system installation $8,530 Jul-01 Watson Asbestos abatement I $182,241 I Aug-01 Watson Energy efficient lighting $106,868 I Aug-01 Watson 1Asbestos abatement $10,000 Aug-02 Watson I Major renovation \u0026amp; addition $800,000 I Aug-02 Western Hills IADA Rest rooms $25,000 Aug-04 Western Hills 1Asbestos abatement I $191 ,946 Aug-02 Western Hills Intercom I $7,100 Dec-01 Western Hills Energy efficient lighting $106,000 - I Jul-01 Williams Renovation I $2,106,492  Mar-04 W-il-liams - Parking expansions I $183,717 Dec-03 Energy efficient lighting - -- $122,719 - -- Williams I Jun-01 Wilson Renovation/expansion I $1 ,263,876 Feb-04 Wilson Parking Expansion I $110,000 Aug-03 Woodruff Renovation I $246,419 Aug-02 4 .:n.. Pl :c C: ~ m ~\n,,, :c -0 C: m~\noz ~\no zm zc,, mo ,.... C: ~ m u, !\"' \u0026gt; C: 0 :::\n0\no \"\no' m c3 =l LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: October 28, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Board Auditor Report BACKGROUND: Monthly report to School Board. RATIONALE: Summary report of activities. FUNDING: No changes. RECOMMENDATION: None. PREPARED BY: Sandy Becker .:n.. ~ ::,: C: \"0 C ~ m ~ l\"::i:: \"0 C: m!f\naz is\na zm zu, mo .... C: ill m U\u0026gt; LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, ARIZA SAS Date: October 28, 2004 To: Board of Directors From:@Sandy Becker, Internal Auditor Re: Audit Report - October This is the sixtieth communication regarding status of the current year projects and reviews. Activity Funds a) Working with two high schools, two middle schools and three elementary schools to resolve financial issues in their activity funds. b) Reviewing monthly financial information for all schools and assisting in resolving balance issues. c) Training school staff at schools on financial processes by request. Activities Advisory Board (AAB) a) Working with the new Activities Advisory Board to develop plans for the new school year and beyond. b) Assist the Activities Advisory Board in its mission to strengthen the effectiveness and viability of activities in the District. c) Working with the Activities Advisory Board to provide ways to assist the different Booster groups in our schools. Board Policy and Regulation a) Coordinating development of payroll guidelines with Financial Services as part of Financial Services Section of the District Operations Manual. Technology a) Monitoring technology plans and technology meetings to determine how use of technology will improve and streamline the workflow for staff persons. b) Facilitating technology upgrade in cooperation with the English Department for Yearbook and Newspaper production staff in LRSD high schools to improve access to tools needed for students and staff Training a) Served as a trainer for financial portion of Nuts \u0026amp; Bolts, Bookkeeper \u0026amp; Secretaries Training, Security Guard Training, individual school in-service meetings, and others as needed. Working to facilitate best means to improve financial processes and increase accountability for resources. Training new bookkeepers on bookkeeping procedures as requested. Audit Report - October 2004 Page 2 of2 b) Placed training material, smart worksheets, and other helpful items on the Teachers Lounge section of the Little Rock School District web page. c) Coordinated guidelines and aids to inform and assist new activity sponsors of specific tasks relating to each activity. Added new checklist for spirit sponsors and smart spreadsheet for fundraiser reconciliation. This information is now in the Teachers Lounge section of the District web page. d) Developed skills test for financial positions. Implementing in coordination with Human Resources. Audit Area Sampling and Review of Financial Procedures Other a) Pulling samples of district expenditures to test for accuracy, accountability, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing district payroll processes for compliance, economy and efficiency, internal controls, and cost control. Working with Financial Services Payroll on internal control and processing issues. b) Working with Financial Services on internal controls and rules for payroll processes and implementation of a new interface system. c) Monitoring other selected risk areas for efficiency, cost effectiveness, and compliance with District policies. Reviewing grant programs. d) Working with Child Nutrition on implementation of streamlined information processing system with Information Services and Child Nutrition Staff. e) Working with Information Services on streamlining of data processes regarding SIS reporting. f) Monitoring cost reduction efforts in the District. g) Monitoring combined payroll and human resources issues for compliance with board direction and internal controls. h) Reviewing leave accountability system. a) Provided technical assistance to school staff on grant writing. b) Served as co-chair of Strategic Team One - Financial Resources. c) Served as District coordinator of United Way's Day of Caring (April 17, 2004) and on planning committee for 2005. Sharefest participating schools this year are: Otter Creek, Mabelvale Middle, J.A. Fair, Romine Elementary, Henderson Middle, Southwest Middle, Cloverdale Middle, Dunbar Middle, Adult Education, Franklin Elementary, and the Alternative Learning Center (off of 6th Street in East End). d) Have advertised for assistant auditor position and hope to have filled soon. Problem Resolution a) I have made myself available to help resolve financial issues, assist in improving processes, and help find solutions to questions that arise. Please let me know if you need further information. My telephone number is 501-447-1115. My e-mail is sandy.becker@lrsd.org.\n,,, 23\ns ~~ -\u0026lt; ::z: \u0026lt;-0 :_i,:..O.. ..., en lm :,c~ ! (\") cz m en C) ~ l\"'::z: ~i :,c  is~ zm zmcon ,.... C: ~ emn DATE: LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 October 28, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Technology Report BACKGROUND: This month the following technology activities took place:  The district was recently notified that E-rate funding appeals were approved by the SLD for 2003-04 funding year. Total approved on appeal was $1.7 million. This is in addition to the already approved amount of $1 .3 million for media retrieval systems in 2003-2004.  Riverdeep math program is now available to Middle and High School students from home via the internet. This application can be accessed from the districts' web page under the \"Parent\" tab.  Technology training classes for teachers are being offered at the Technology Center and have been well attended. RATIONALE: To implement the LRSD Technology Plan 2003 - 2006 FUNDING: N/A RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board accept this report. PREPARED BY: Lucy Neal, Director, Technology and Media Services John Ruffins, Director, Computer Information Services !Jl -n z \u0026gt;z (\") ! ~\n,,,::c \"DC: m~ ::Oz ~\no zm Z Ul mo ,- C: ~ m U) LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: October 28, 2004 TO: FROM: Board of Directors Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: SECOND READING: POLICY JIH - STUDENT SEARCHES BACKGROUND: Attorney Chris Heller provided a report at the September board meeting regarding the recent ruling from the Eighth Circuit Court of appeals on our student search procedures. At that time, the Board approved policy JIH on first reading. RATIONALE: The Board of Directors and the LRSD administration have an obligation to provide a safe and secure learning environment for our students. It is therefore necessary for our security staff to conduct constitutionally lawful searches when necessary and appropriate. Legal counsel has recommended implementing a Board policy that will provide for those searches to be conducted for administrative rather than for law enforcement purposes. FUNDING: No additional funding required. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the need for additional research by our attorneys, it is recommended that the Board table action on second reading of policy JIH, Student Searches at this time. After additional review, the policy will be returned for second reading approval and implementation. PREPARED BY: Sadie Mitchell Chris Heller ~ ?\" :r \"0 C: m~\noz lS\no zm zu, mo ,... C: ~ m \u0026lt;n .?.,' z z\u0026gt; n 5,: ~ ~ ?\"~ cer. o~ Zcr. ~er. 6~ z\n:c \u0026lt;n \u0026lt; c,,'.: er. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT NEPN CODE: JIH STUDENT SEARCHES It is the policy of the Little Rock School District Board of Education to conduct administrative searches of students for the purpose of detecting and deterring the presence of weapons and drugs in schools. In order for the District to implement an effective search policy in accordance with the U.S. Constitution, student searches will be conducted for administrative, rather than law enforcement purposes. Accordingly, to the extent this policy does not conflict with state or federal law, any contraband discovered during an administrative search of a student will subject that student to appropriate Little Rock School District administrative sanctions but will not be reported to law enforcement authorities. Any student found in possession of drugs or any contraband will be given an administrative sanction as outlined in the Little Rock Students Rights and Responsibilities Handbook. DATE: October 28, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Personnel Changes BACKGROUND: None RATIONALE: To staff allocated positions within the District FUNDING: Operating Fund RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the following personnel changes be approved at the indicated positions, salaries and classifications. In accordance with A.CA 6-17-1502, it is recommended that one additional year of probationary status is provided for all teachers who have been employed in a school district in this state for three (3) consecutive years. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 19, 2004 for regular schools are considered intern teachers. Teachers with an effective date of employment after August 9, 2004 for EYE are considf.rJd intern teachers. PREPARED BY: Beverly William7oirector of Human Resources .., z  nz ! Personnel Changes Page2 October 28, 2004 NAME POSITION SCHOOL START DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS Resignations/Terminations Certified Employees NONE New Certified Employees Baker, Deborah Reading Rec. 9-13-04 1-07 STEPHENS TCH925 Balmaz, Bettye Elem II 9-9-04 5-20 BOOKER TCH925 Binyon, Jonathan English 8-11-04 1-03 PARKVIEW TCH925 Brown, Carleton English 8-11-04 4-01 CENTRAL TCH925 Durham, Karen Special Ed 8-11-04 2-10 PHMS SPE925 England, Patricia English 8-11-04 1-01 PHMS TCH925 Forehand, Shirley Math 8-11-04 1-09 MABELVALE MID TCH925 Fuss, Amy American History 8-11-04 1-01 FOREST HGTS. TCH925 Gardenhire, Carroll Special Ed. 8-11-04 4-05 ALT LRNG CNTR SPE925 Green, Sarah English 8-11-04 1-01 PHMS TCH925 Horne, Wanda Special Ed. 8-11-04 1-04 HENDERSON SPE925 ANNUAL SALARY 37318.00 annual 31681.43 prorated 57276.00 annual 51309.75 prorated 31195.00 34575.00 40785.00 30040.00 38127.00 30040.00 38041 .00 30040.00 32350.00 Personnel Changes Page 3 October 28, 2004 NAME Ledoux, Kim Miller, Kasey Myton, Debra Pritz, Colleen Rizzardi, Marcia Roberts, Melanie Shue, Mary Trammell, Brett Walker, Sharon Warren, Alyson Whaley, Andress POSITION SCHOOL Math JA FAIR Math MANN Counselor PARKVIEW Pre-Algebra PHMS English PARKVIEW English FOREST HGTS. English FOREST HGTS. Spanish CENTRAL Math ALT LRNG CNTR Business Ed PARKVIEW English HALL ST ART DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS 8-11-04 4-01 TCH925 8-11-04 1-01 TCH925 8-16-04 4-11 CNL10 8-11-04 2-17 TCH925 8-11 -04 4-08 TCH925 8-11-04 1-01 TCH925 8-18-04 4-18 TCH925 8-11-04 1-01 TCH925 9-13-04 4-05 TCH925 8-20-04 1-01 TCH925 8-11-04 4-07 TCH925 Certified Promotion ANNUAL SALARY 34575.00 30040.00 50560.00 annual 49277.25 prorated 49217.00 41507.00 30040.00 53061 .00 annual 51679.20 prorated 30040.00 38041 .00 annual 33682.01 prorated 30040.00 annual 29101 .25 40351.00 Sebourn, Karen Promoted from 9.25 mo. teacher to 9.25 mo. librarian position split between Carver and Washington ?\u0026lt; 0 ~ 0 en z C'l\na m ~\no: en 2:5 ~ ?\u0026lt; 0 :c ls~ C\na ~z 31:C'l men .z. . ~ \u0026gt; ~u. o- 0~ z u. ~: 0 IT Z\n,t en\u0026lt; c': IT u. Personnel Changes Page4 October 28, 2004 NAME POSITION SCHOOL ST ART DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS Certified Transfer NONE Resignations/Terminations Non-Certified Employees Bealer, Henry Driver Asst. 1-27-98 42-09 Reason: None Given PROCUREMENT 10-28-04 AN12 Bluford, Jacqueline Trainee 9-14-03 2-02 Reason: Terminated CHILD NUTR 9-21-04 FSMEAL Brown, Ann Deseg Monitor 7-26-88 1-01 Reason: Retired DESEGRATION 10-28-04 DESMON Campbell, Paul Instr. Aide 8-11-04 33-13 Reason: None Given DODD 9-21-04 INA925 Clark, Tenisha Instr. Aide 4-17-97 33-16 Reason: None Given CLOVERDALE 8-10-04 INA925 Dokes, Joann Child Nutrition 3-10-04 3-01 Reason: None Given MCDERMOTT 8-16-04 FSH550 Foster, Napoleon Bus Driver 8-14-98 3-11 Reason: Health TRANSPORT 9-10-04 BUSDRV Johnson, Lott Security Officer 4-12-04 36-10 Reason: None Given JA FAIR 9-16-04 SOFR9 Jones, Taneadra Care 8-30-04 2-02 Reason: None Given CARE 10-28-04 CARE Mitchell, Tolice Care 8-30-04 1-03 Reason: None Given CARE 10-11-04 CARE Crosby, Darlene Instr. Aide 1-31-91 33-17 Reason: Personal WAKEFIELD 10-01-04 INA925 Payne, Celeste Instr. Aide 8-11-04 33-13 Reason: Personal FOREST PARK 9-15-04 INA925 Pitts, Joe Custodian 8-28-01 31-05 Reason: None Given DUNBAR 5-28-04 CUS925 ANNUAL SALARY 25632.00 13472.00 119022.00 14735.00 16109.00 9350.00 16390.00 15463.00 7.70 per hour 7.28 per hour 16595.00 14735.00 12821.00 Personnel Changes Page 5 October 28, 2004 NAME Reeves, Sharon Reason: Retired Simpson, Sylvia Reason: None Given Smith, Jimmy Reason: None Given Tidwell, Paula Reason: Personal Ye, Weiwen Reason: Personal Alexander, Betty Anderson, Carroll Baker, Paul Boyd, April Brown, Darrell POSITION SCHOOL ST ART DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS Secretary 4-1-82 51-20 MAINTENANCE 9-13-04 MAINT Custodian 1-26-04 31-03 MABELVALE JR 5-28-04 CUS925 Instr. Aide 4-7-03 33-17 ALE 8-10-04 INA925 Custodian 8-18-00 31-07 ROMINE 9-27-04 CUS925 Instr. Aide 10-21-98 33-20 GIBBS 11-8-04 INA925 New Non-Certified Em~lo~ees Child Nutrition 9-11-04 3-01 PHMS FSH550 Custodian 9-7-04 31-01 MITCHELL CUS12 Custodian 9-20-04 31-01 MANN CUS925 Nurse 9-13-04 52-08 WOODRUFF NURSES FOREST PARK PUL. HGTS. ELEM. Custodian 10-04-04 31-01 FRANKLIN CUS928 ANNUAL SALARY 46572.00 12085.00 16595.00 13616.00 18149.00 9350.00 annual 8394.89 prorated 14532.00 annual 11749.00 prorated 11379.00 annual 9832.94 prorated 33528.00 annual 28463.87 prorated 11379.00 annual 9338.20 prorated ?\u0026lt; (\") 5 (I) z Cl\n,:, m ~\n:,\u0026lt;\n(I) ~ :,.. ?\u0026lt; C::c ls~ C:::::,:, ~z I: Cl me,, :!:j ~ .\u0026gt; a: ~ c- 0~ z er. ~: o rr Z\n:t Cl\u0026gt;\u0026lt; ?\nrr er. Personnel Changes Page 6 October 28, 2004 NAME Bryant, Caroline Burnett, Tarneisha Cartznes, Jerome Clayton, Bobby Cross, Dunte Curry, Tangela Davis, Arrysen Dorsey, Betty Doss, Jimmy Draper, James Evans, Felicia POSITION SCHOOL ST ART DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS Care 10-18-04 3-17 CARE CARE Care 9-13-04 2-03 CARE CARE Care 9-13-04 2-02 CARE CARE Custodian 9-07-04 31-01 PHMS CUS12 Custodian 8-23-04 31-01 MEADOWCLIFF CUS925 Care 9-17-04 3-08 CARE CARE Care 10-11-04 2-01 CARE CARE Child Nutrition 9-11-04 3-01 HALL FSH550 Instr. Aide 8-12-04 33-19 MABELVALE MIDDLE INA925 Maintenance 9-8-04 40-01 PLANT SERVICES MAINT Instr. Aide 8-25-04 33-05 FOREST HEIGHTS INA925 ANNUAL SALARY 10.36 per hour 7.38 per hour 7.70 per hour 14532.00 annual 11749.28 prorated 5689.50 annual 5503.97 prorated 8.85 per hour 7.55 per hour 9350.00 annual 8394.00 prorated 17621 .00 annual 17525.75 prorated 19020.00 annual 15216.00 prorated 11600.00 annual 10972.97 prorated Personnel Changes Page7 October 28, 2004 NAME Ewing, Pavia Fields, Samia Foreman, Lakeisha Geeter, Lula Gregory, Regena Hamilton, Ronita Harvell, Lola Hendrix, Christal Higgins, Greogory POSITION SCHOOL Clerical BRADY Instr. Aide CHICOT Child Nutrition HALL Care CARE Nurse STEPHENS Care CARE Child Nutrition PARKVIEW Clerical STEPHENS Maintenance ST ART DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS 9-13-04 39-08 CLK10 10-06-04 33-04 INA925 9-01-04 3-01 FSH550 10-11-04 4-01 CARE 9-20-04 38-03 NURSES 9-13-04 1-08 CARE 8-30-04 3-01 FSH550 9-13-04 39-04 CLK10 10-04-04 49-07 PLANT SERVICES MAINT ANNUAL SALARY 25632.00 annual 22096.55 prorated 11253.00 annual 9002.40 prorated 9350.00 annual 8797.04 prorated 6.25 per hour 19020.00 annual 15651.87 prorated 8.05 per hour 9350.00 annual 8897.58 prorated 20184.00 annual 16306.29 prorated 29760.00 annual 21781.79 prorated :-\u0026lt; n,... 0 U\u0026gt; z Q\n,:, m I ~ U\u0026gt; :!S :,.. ?\u0026lt; O::r:: 5~ C:\n,:, ~z :1:0 mu, .z.. . ~\n,,,,~ V. 8~ z V. ~::: Oz\n:rcr U\u0026gt; \u0026lt; 1\" rr V. Personnel Changes Page 8 October 28, 2004 NAME Holliman, Darren Jackson, Debbie Jackson, Gwendolyn Jackson, Laura Johnson, Mildred Jones, Valerie Madden, Andrea Marsh, Janice Mathis, Taurus POSITION SCHOOL ST ART DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS Maintenance 9-13-04 49-07 PLANT SERVICES MAINT Child Nutrition 9-01-04 3-01 HALL FSH550 Instr. Aide 9-15-04 33-16 CLOVERDALE ELEM. INA925 Custodian 8-16-04 1-01 J. A. FAIR CUS925 Child Nutrition 9-01-04 3-01 HALL FSH550 Care 9-13-04 1-06 CARE CARE Child Nutrition 9-27-04 7-01 WILLIAMS FSH650 Child Nutrition 9-01-04 3-01 WILLIAMS FSH550 Instr. Aide 9-21-04 33-16 HENDERSON INA925 ANNUAL SALARY 29760.00 annual 23554.72 prorated 9350.00 annual 8797.04 prorated 16109.00 annual 14019.18 prorated 5689.50 annual 5658.58 prorated 9350.00 annual 8797.04 prorated 7.74 per hour 11050.00 annual 9327.15 prorated 9350.00 annual 8797.04 prorated 16109.00 annual 13670.88 prorated Personnel Changes Page9 October 28, 2004 NAME McCoy, Betty McKenzie, Sherman Mitchell, Cecelia Muhammad, Kaye Nash, Niketa Nolly, Carolyn Nounanno, Christain Ollison, Yolanda Peterson, Montez Pondexter, Brack POSITION SCHOOL ST ART DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS Child Nutrition 10-05-04 3-01 GEYER SPRINGS FSH550 Instr. Aide 8-16-04 33-16 FOREST HEIGHTS INA925 Child Nutrition 8-24-04 3-01 J.A. FAIR FSH550 Instr. Aide 9-28-04 33-09 WAKEFIELD INA925 Instr. Aide 8-11-04 33-06 ALC INA925 Instr. Aide 8-23-04 33-03 FOREST HEIGHTS INA925 Instr. Aide 8-25-04 33-01 J. A. FAIR INA925 Care 9-13-04 1-04 CARE INA925 Security Officer 8-16-04 36-16 CENTRAL SOFR9 Instr. Aide 8-17-04 33-9 ALC INA925 ANNUAL SALARY 9350.00 annual 7691 .13 prorated 16109.00 annual 5847.77 prorated 9350.00 annual 9098.66 prorated 5228.00 annual 4295.44 prorated 11946.00 10934.00 annual 10461 .00 prorated 10295.00 annual 9738.51 prorated 7.41 per hour 18491 .00 13070.00 annual 12787.41 prorated ?\u0026lt; C'\u0026gt; r- 0 (/) z C)\nIll m !\n,,: (/) ?S ~ ?\u0026lt; 0::,: 5!\n! \u0026lt;=\n,o ~z :I: C) mu, .z.. . ~ ,,.a: . C c,, g~ Zc,, ~~ 0 IT z\n,c U\u0026gt;\u0026lt; c': IT c,, Personnel Changes Page 10 October 28, 2004 NAME Reams, Bernard Simpson, Nena Spaight, Linda Stricklen, Lisa Taylor, Lee Thompson, Dian Vanderpool, Milagros William, Adam Williams, Mary Wilson Murray, Judy POSITION SCHOOL Instr. Aide BASELINE Child Nutrition MCCLELLAN Instr. Aide ROCKEFELLER Child Nutrition HENDERSON Security Officer MCCLELLAN Custodian CARVER Care CARE Maintenance START DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS 9-20-04 33-13 INA925 8-27-04 3-01 FSH550 9-20-04 33-09 INA12 8-30-04 3-01 FSH550 8-16-04 36-11 SOFR9 9-27-04 31-01 CUS925 9-20-04 1-06 CARE 9-9-04 40-01 PLANT SERVICES MAINT Care 10-4-04 1-05 CARE CARE Clerical 9-22-04 39-12 BOOKER CLK10 ANNUAL SALARY 14735.00 annual 12584.49 prorated 9350.00 annual 8947.85 prorated 16603.00 annual 12858.49 prorated 9350.00 annual 8897.58 prorated 15929.00 5689.50 annual 4761.86 prorated 8.33 per hour 19020.00 annual 15135.06 prorated 7.56 per hour 25632.00 annual 21212.69 prorated Personnel Changes Page 11 October 28, 2004 NAME Wilson, Tina Woodley, Stephanie Cooper, Floyd Davis, Johnnie Williams, Ed POSITION SCHOOL ST ART DATE SALARY END DATE CLASS Child Nutrition 8-30-04 3-01 WESTERN HILLS FSH550 Instr. Aide 9-10-04 33-04 WASHINGTON INA925 Reclassification Supervisor 7-1-04 60-20 TRANSPORTATION AN12 Supervisor 7-1-04 60-20 TRANSPORTATION AN12 Research Spec. 7 -1-04 64-20 PRE ADC12 ANNUAL SALARY 9350.00 annual 8897.58 prorated 5964.09 annual 5287.09 prorated 60924.00 60924.00 64668.00 ?\u0026lt; ,(.\"..). 0 (/) z Cl :,0 m I (/) ?S :,.. ?\u0026lt; 0::,:: 5~ C: :,0 ~z :I: Cl mU\u0026gt; z --t DATE: October 28, 2004 TO: Board of Directors LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Donations of Property BACKGROUND: The Little Rock School District receives donations from businesses and individuals on a regular basis. It is the policy of the Little Rock School District that donations are not formally accepted until they are approved by the Board of Directors. RATIONALE: District policy states that, in order to maintain the centralized fixed asset property accounting system, all property donation requests are forwarded to the Director of Procurement. The Procurement Department forwards the requests, along with the appropriate recommendations, to the Board of Directors for acceptance and aproval. In order for proper recognition and appreciation to be conveyed to the donor, donor's name and current mailing address should be included in the donation memo. FUNDING: None RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the attached donation requests be approved and accepted in accordance with the policies of the Board of Directors of the Little Rock School District. PREPARED BY: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement Gwen Caraway, Fixed Asset Property Manager ?\u0026lt; n g z C) I DONATIONS School/Department Item Donor Central High School Desk, chair, HP Tonja, Michael and Pavilion 17\" monitor Chris Hettinger and HP Desktop scanner. Total value of all donated items is $200.00. Central High School $500.00 cash to the Jeanie Brown Swim Team Central High School $80.00 cash toward Bob and Wanda the \"Spirit Banner\" Wimberley Central High School $245.00 cash toward Sol Alman Company the \"Spirit Banner\" Central High School $300.00 cash to the Randal and Jan Hundley Troubadours Club Central High School $250.00 cash toward Rosie Dunham, the completion of the Class of 1943-44 reflecting pool and $250.00 cash to be used as needed Cloverdale Magnet Large sandwich food Burger King/Allied Food Middle School coupons valued at Industries, Inc. approximately $50.00 Cloverdale Magnet Employee of the Ryan's Grill, Buffet and Middle School month food coupons Bakery valued at approximately $50.00 Gibbs Magnet Six (6) computer Nuvell Financial Services Elementary School monitors, valued at $600.00, to be used for student advancement Hall High School Weight and training Mr. Fred Barofsky and equipment, valued at friends in memory of approximately Donnie Dietz, a 1962 $20,000.00, for new graduate from Hall gym and Donnie Dietz Scholar Athletes Citizenship Award to be presented to a Hall student each year .!J.,I z  School/Department Item Donor z (') \u0026gt;,... (/) Martin L. King, Jr. $100.00 cash for Reza Hakkak, parent lnterdistrict Magnet use by counselors Elementary School in purchasing uniforms and school supplies McClellan Magnet $1,000.00 cash to be Mr. Jerome Tidemore, High School distributed equally to Algebra I teacher ~ (') students who scored ,... 0 (/) proficient and advanced z C\u0026gt; on the End of Course\n,:, m Exam ~ :,\n: (/) Pulaski Heights Sound system, valued Pulaski Heights Elementary Elementary School at $2,765.00, for the and Middle School PT A auditorium Pulaski Heights Services of a full-time Pulaski Heights Elementary Elementary School art teacher, valued at PTA $21,640.50, for the i!S ~ ?\u0026lt; 2004-05 school year O:z: 5~ C:\n,:, Rightsell Academy $300.00 cash to be J. R. and Mary Sue 2lz ~C\u0026gt; m\u0026lt;n applied toward the Gusewelle ~ school uniform drive Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street DATE: Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 9/2/2004 TO: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT ~ FROM: NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRI CIPAL --(V:, ci-LL(tu. \\__, SUBJECT: DONATION Tonja, Michael \u0026amp; Chris Hettinger of 4 Butterfly Cove, Little Rock, AR 72210, donated the following items, valued at $200.00, to Central High School: 1. Desk 2. Chair 3. HP Pavilion 17\" Monitor 4. HP Desktop Scanner It is my recommendation that these items be accepted m accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. .:  ~ f\":'. t, ....... . l,.-\nDATE: TO: FROM: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 9/10/2004 SUBJECT: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT NA CY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL~ DO ATION Jeanie Brown of 60 Longlea Court, Little Rock, AR 72212, very generously donated $500.00 to the Little Rock Central High School Swim Team. It is my recommendation that these items be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. r. :.~ :- r~ 1 ... }~: :,-:. j j f!  I\n1 ~  - .... DATE: TO: FROM: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 9/13/2004 DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIPAL ~ SUBJECT: DO ATION Bob \u0026amp; Wanda Wimberley of 6502 Pleasant Place, Little Rock, AR 72205, very graciously donated $80.00 toward the \"Spirit Banner\" for LRCH. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. ~ DATE: TO: FROM: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-447-1401 9/13/2004 DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT NANCY ROUSSEAU, PRINCIP SUBJECT: DO ATION Sol Alman Company of 1300 East 9th Street, Little Rock, AR 72203, very graciously donated $245.00 toward the \"Spirit Banner\" for LRCH. It is my recommendation that this donation be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. ~ n 5 u, z C) :,::, I u, DATE: TO: FROM: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 9/24/2004 SUBJECT: DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF !)}OCURE~ENT A CY ROUSSEAU, PRI CIPAL ~ ~ DO ATIO Randal \u0026amp; Jan Hundley of 5515 Country Club Blvd., Little Rock, AR 72207, graciously contributed $300.00 to the Troubadours Club. It is my recommendation that this contribution be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District.   ~  ~ r -  t-' \\ - - - : - ~ ,.~ f: :t~ t: DATE: TO: FROM: Little Rock Central High School 1500 South Park Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 Phone 501-44 7-1400 Fax 501-44 7-1401 9/21/2004 DARRAL PARADIS, DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT A CY ROUSSEAU, PRI CIPAL ~ SUBJECT: DO ATIO Rosie Dunham, in behalf of Little Rock High School's class of 1943-1944, graciously contributed $250.00 toward the completion of the reflecting pool and $250.00 to be spent as we desire. Ms. Dunham's address is 3017 N. Grant, Little Rock, AR 72207. It is my recommendation that these items be accepted in accordance with the donation policies of the Little Rock School District. CLOVERDALE MAGNET MIDDLE SCHOOL October 4, 2004 To: Mr. Darral Paradis Director of Procurement From: Angela '2tt},,,ncipal RE: Donation Please accept the donation listed below to Cloverdale Magnet Middle School. Jeffery Williams, District Manager Burger King Large Sandwich Allied Food Industries, Inc. Food Coupons 3300 S. University Ave. Little Rock, AR 72204 Approximate Value $50.00 n\n'-:- i~ ?r~ 1~ ~ t . ~ \\,.:- - -  6300 Hinkson Road  Phone /501) 447-2500  Fax /501) 447 -2501  Little Rock. Arkansas CLOVERDALE MAGNET MIDDLE SCHOOL October 4, 2004 To: Mr. Darral Paradis Director of Procurement a /vl1 From: Angela Munns, Principal RE: Donation Please accept the donation listed below to Cloverdale Magnet Middle School. RYA 'S Grill, Buffet \u0026amp; Bakery 8815 Baseline Rd. Little Rock, AR 72209 Employee of the Month Food Coupons Approximate Value $50.00 6300 Hinkson Road  Phone (501) 447-2500  Fax 1501) 447-2501  Little Rock. Arkansas 72209 ?\u0026lt; (\") 5 en z Cl\na I rn GIBBS MAGNET Memo To: Darral Paradis, Director Procurement J / From: Felicia Hobbs, Principakft\\ I CC: Dr. Sadie Mitchell Oats 9/28/2004 Ra: Donations Nuvell Financial Services, a loan servicing company in Little Rock, wishes to donate six (6) computer monitors to be used for student advancement in education. The monitors are valued at $100.00 each in which there is a total of $600.00 It is recommended this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District. In advance, thank you for your consideration. FH:kt # hall high school 6700 \"H\" Street  (501 } 447-1900  Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 To: From: Darral Paradis, Director of Prqcurement Vernon Smith, Jr., Principal V~C[f'RE: Donated Equipment Date: October 5, 2004 Mr. Fred Barofsky and friends are donating equipment for the weight and training room for our new gym in the name of Donnie Dietz who graduated from Hall High School in 1962. Mr. Barofsky and friends attended West Point Military Academy and were football teammates of Mr. Dietz. Mr. Dietz died in Vietnam. Mr. Dietz teammates would like to present the Donnie Dietz Scholar Athletes Citizenship Award to a Hall High School student each year. The following equipment should arrive in the next four to six weeks: The donation will total approximately $20,000.00 dollars. A list of donated equipment is as follows:  Stationary Bike (2)  Bicep Curl  Lat Pull Down (2)  Seated Row Press  Abdominal Press  Leg Press  Seated Leg Curl  Leg Extension  Shoulder Press (2)  Chest Press  Standing Calf Machine  Dual Adjustable Pulley (2)  Ice Machine  Training Table  Training Supplies !.J.,I z \u0026gt;z (\") \u0026gt; ~ MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. INTERDISTRICT MAGNET SCHOOL To: Darral Paradise, Director of Procurement J.H, From: Tyrone Harris, Principal Date: September 1, 2004 Re: Donation A parent of Martin Luther King Elementary Magnet School has generously donated $100.00 to our counselors. The money will serve the purpose of assisting in purchasing uniforms and school supplies for our students. The parent is Reza Hakkak of 12680 Rivercrest Dr., Little Rock, AR 72212. It is recommended that this donation request be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. t{ 905 Martin Luther King , Jr. Drive  Phone (501) 447-5100  Fax (501) 447-5101  Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 ' McCLELLAN MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL THE ACADEMIES: BUSINESS FINANCE, ENGINEERING, MULTIMEDIA To: Darral Paradis, Director - Procurement and Materials Management From: Larry Buck, Principal ~ McClellan Magnet~ Re: Donation Date: September 7, 2004 Mr. Jerome Tidemore, an Algebra I teacher on staff at McClellan Magnet High School, has generously donated to the students of McClellan $1 ,000.00. This donation will be equally divided between these students who scored proficient and advanced on the End of Course Exam during the Spring 2004 Assessment. It is my recommendation that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Board of Education of the Little Rock School District. r~~ ~-: ~ ~= r : r r.~ ~ L ..i :-, '\":\n\n.J : ~. i. l- ~ 9417 Geyer Springs Road  Phone 447-2100  Little Rock, Arkansas 72209 ?\u0026lt; n 5 u, z C) ::,:, I u, PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TO: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement FROM: Lillie Carter, Principal/,~ DATE: September 8, 2004 RE: Donation The Pulaski Heights Elementary P.T.A. and the Pulaski Heights Middle School P.T.A. has generously donated a sound system for the auditorium valued at $2,765.00. Equipment donated is as follows:  Mackie DFX Mixer $380.00  Crown PCC 160 Microphones(3) 900.00  Gemini CDJ -10 CD player 225.00  Crown XL5202 Amplifier 410.00  Yamaha MSP3 Power Monitor 150.00  Miscellaneous wire connections 500.00  Power Master Switch 200.00 It is recommended that this generous donation be approved in accordance with the polices of the Board of Education. cc: Frances Jones Assistant Superintendent 3' 9 North Pine src-f-'  F\"\"'11C 4.i!.--5900  Fax 447-5901  Little Rock. Arkansas 72205 PULASKI HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TO: FROM: DATE: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement Lillie Carter, Principal J 4, September 8, 2004 RE: Donation The Pulaski Heights Elementary P.T.A. wishes to donate the service of a full-time art teacher for the 2004-2005 school year. The P.T.A. will pay the art teacher $21,640.50. This includes supplies and materials. It is recommended that this generous donation be approved in accordance with the polices of the Board of Education. cc: f ranees Jones Assistant Superintendent 319 North Pine Su,::co  r  = .1.17-5900  Fa, .1.1--sao  Little Rock Arkansas 72205 RIGHTSELL A CADEMY \"Great Expectations: Believe! Achieve! Succeed!\" TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Darral Paradis, Director of Procurement r/ Eunice M. Thrasher, Principani \\ Rightsell Academy I\" September 22, 2004 Donation The donor listed below has generously donated $300.00 towards the school uniform drive: J.R. and Mary Sue Gusewelle 13824 Pleasant Forest Drive Little Rock, AR 72212 It is recommended that this donation be approved in accordance with the policies of the Little Rock School District Board of Directors. Thank you. /lh 'I 911 W,s! 1 9 Stree:  Phone (501 .:.:--61QO  Fa,: 150 ~.:---::::-  Little Roe\u0026lt; A,rk2'7sas 72205- LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT 810 WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK, AR 72201 DATE: October 28, 2004 TO: Board of Directors FROM: Roy G. Brooks, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools SUBJECT: Financial Reports BACKGROUND: Financial reporting is designed to keep the Board of Directors up-to-date regarding the District's current financial condition. Financial reports are submitted monthly to the Board for review and approval. RATIONALE: September 2004 financial reports are submitted for the Board's review and approval. FUNDING: N/A RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of Directors approve the September 2004 financial reports as submitted. PREPARED BY: Mark D. Milhollen, Manager Financial Services LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003 AND 2004 APPROVED RECEIPTS % APPROVED RECEIPTS % 2003/04 09/30/03 COLLECTED 2004/05 09/30/04 COLLECTED REVENUE-LOCAL SOURCES CURRENT TAXES 57,547,800 11 ,111,439 19.31% 61,436,691 12,467,263 20.29% DELINQUENT TAXES 10,100,000 807,595 8.00% 12,135,000 986,045 8.13% 40% PULLBACK 29,600,000 31 ,250,000 EXCESS TREASURER'S FEE 210,000 205,000 DEPOSITORY INTEREST 180,000 155,000 REVENUE IN LIEU OF TAXES 150,000 185,000 MISCELLANEOUS AND RENTS 380,000 198,137 52.14% 485,000 13,590 2.80% INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS 200,000 43,822 21 .91% 245,000 82,243 33.57% ATHLETIC RECEIPTS 240,000 42,599 17.75% 215,000 48,071 22.36% TOTAL 98,607,800 12,203,593 12.38% 106,311,691 13,597,212 12.79% REVENUE-COUNTY SOURCES COUNTY GENERAL 21 ,000 5,420 25.81% 22,000 5,644 25.65% TOTAL 21,000 5,420 25.81% 22,000 5,644 25.65% REVENUE  STATE SOURCES EQUALIZATION FUNDING 53,226,139 9,677,479 18.18% 65,082,694 11 ,852,204 18.21% ALTERNATIVE LEARNING 1,927,250 481 ,812 25.00% ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS 193,739 NATL SCHL LUNCH STUDENT FUNDING 6,498,240 1,181,498 18.18% PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 1,141 ,165 1,141 ,165 100.00% REIMBURSEMENT STRS/HEAL TH 8,300,000 8,275,000 1,387,526 16.77% VOCATIONAL 1,400,000 266,989 19.07% 1,350,000 195,052 14.45% HANDICAPPED CHILDREN 1,675,000 2,100,000 EARLY CHILDHOOD 273,358 68,340 25.00% 5,542,510 1,430,540 25.81% TRANSPORTATION 3,875,562 1,243,841 32.09% 4,125,000 1,325,044 32.12% INCENTIVE FUNDS  M TO M 3,900,000 368,422 9.45% 4,575,000 414,913 9.07% ADULT EDUCATION 920,337 8,417 0.91% 934,380 109,000 11.67% POVERTY INDEX FUNDS 560,545 267,486 47.72% TAP PROGRAM 285,245 142,623 50.00% 382,903 7,645 2.00% AT RISK FUNDING 360,000 395,000 9,400 2.38% TOTAL 74,776,187 12,043,596 16.11% 102,522,882 19,535,799 19.06% REVENUE OTHER SOURCES TRANSFER FROM CAP PROJ FUND 770,000 770,000 TRANSFER FROM OTHER FUNDS 1,350,000 18,519 1.37% 1,295,000 8,416 0.65% TRANSFER FROM MAGNET FUND 1,632,430 1,849,008 TOTAL 3,752,430 18,519 0.49% 3,914,008 8,416 0.22% TOTAL REVENUE OPERATING 177,157,418 24,271,129 13.70% 212,770,581 33,147,071 15.58% REVENUE  OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 24,075,790 2,160,329 8.97% 21 ,531,929 1,972,536 9.16% DEDICATED M \u0026amp; 0 4,000,000 21 ,884 0.55% 4,500,000 57,924 1.29% MAGNET SCHOOLS 24,689,351 2,282,885 27,964,934 2,191,329 7.84% TOTAL 52,765,141 4,465,099 8.46% 53,996,863 4,221,789 7.82% TOTAL REVENUE 229,922,559 28,736,225 12.50% 266,767,444 37,368,861 14.01% LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003 AND 2004 APPROVED EXPENDED % APPROVED EXPENDED % 200~ 04 09/30/03 EXPENDED 2004/05 09/30/04 EXPENDED EXPENSES SALARIES 100,684,982 12,825,743 12.74% 117,324,912 14,828,817 12.64% BENEFITS 26,483,772 3,473,524 13.12% 36,185,811 4,383,568 12.11% PURCHASED SERVICES 19,719,297 2,914,009 14.78% 20,959,918 2,682,273 12.80% MATERIALS \u0026amp; SUPPLIES 8,185,459 2,284,946 27.91% 8,725,914 1,850,893 21 .21% CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,575,580 91 ,687 5.82% 2,760,600 283,330 10.26% OTHER OBJECTS 8,384,567 69,173 0.83% 10,770,418 73,741 0.68% DEBT SERVICE 12,098,342 4,705,779 38.90% 12,474,809 4,590,834 36.80% TOTAL EXPENSES OPERATING 177,131,999 26,364,861 14.88% 209,202,382 28,693,456 13.72% EXPENSES-OTHER FEDERAL GRANTS 26,056,193 2,515,820 9.66% 23,853,134 2,332,732 9.78% DEDICATED M \u0026amp; 0 4,000,000 1,235,893 30.90% 5,007,809 1,061 ,880 21 .20% MAGNET SCHOOLS 24,689,351 2,491,447 10.09% 27,964,934 2,989,585 10.69% TOTAL 54,745,544 6,243,159 11.40% 56,825,877 6,384,197 11 .23% TOTAL EXPENSES 231,877,543 32,608,020 14.06% 266,028,259 35,077,653 13.19% INCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE (1 ,954,984) (3 ,871 ,796) 739,184 2,291 ,207 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; OED M \u0026amp; 0 3,558,580 3,558,580 4,005,957 4,005,957 OPERATING 9,026,855 9,026,855 6,531 ,706 6,531 ,706 ENDING FUND BALANCE FEDERAL, MAGNET \u0026amp; OED M \u0026amp; 0 1,578,177 1,780,520 1,176,943 1,843,550 OPERATING 9,052,274 6,933,120 10,099,905 10,985,321 TOTAL 10,630,451 8,713,640 11,276,848 12,828,871 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ACCOUNT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 PROJECT BEG BALANCE INCOME TRANSFERS EXPENDITURES ENCUMBRANCES END BALANCE 07-01 -04 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 2004-05 09-30-04 $6,200,000 BOND ISSUE FAIR 17,956.90 2,900.00 15,056.90 MCCLELLAN 77,219.02 77,219.02 CLOVERDALE MIDDLE 396.12 396.12 CONTINGENCY 0.00 0.00 SUBTOTAL 95,572.04 0.00 0.00 2,900.00 0.00 92,672.04 $136,268,560 BOND ISSUES ADMINISTRATION 4,906.21 80,000.00 21 ,393.23 63,512.98 NEW WORK PROJECTS 6,088,520.49 1,939,015.99 955,096.57 3,194,407.93 SECURITY PROJECTS 14,541 .25 14,541.25 LIGHTING PROJECTS 20,856.80 20,856.80 MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR 7,567,591 .92 401 ,306.82 251 ,312.38 6,914,972.72 RENOVATION PROJECTS 13,366,715.04 3,444,763.38 2,449,707.91 7,472,243.75 TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES 1,569,424.27 1,143,377.19 175,433.96 265,415.90 2,271,951 .60 SUBTOTAL 28,632,555.98 1,143,377.19 80,000.00 5,981 ,913.38 3,921 ,532.76 19,952,487.03 REVENUES PROCEEDS-PROPERTY SALE 445,618.31 445,618.31 DUNBAR PROJECT 5,266.71 5,266.71 PROCEEDS-BOND SALES 14,143,144.75 (80,000.00) 14,063,144.75 PROCEEDS-QZAB SALE 1,293,820.97 1,293,820.97 INTEREST 5,037,437.95 359,962.12 5,397,400.07 SUBTOTAL 20,925,288.69 359,962.12 (80,000.00) 0.00 0.00 21,205,250.81 GRAND TOTAL ~l! ~~ ~Hi Zl l ~!l~ ~\nHI ~l l2.J2l2 li !Ill~ Ill~ ~II ~ l!~l ~~~ Zli ~l ~~!l !l!ll! Ill! PROJECT CATEGORIES ADMINISTRATION NEW WORK PROJECTS SECURITY PROJECTS LIGHTING PROJECTS MAINTENANCE \u0026amp; REPAIR RENOVATION PROJECTS TECHNOLOGY UPGRADES UNALLOCATED PROCEEDS TOTAL LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT BOND ISSUE PROJECT HISTORY THRU THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 I r I PROJECT I ALLOCATIONS THRU 09-30-04 EXPENSE 2000-01 EXPENSE 2001-02 EXPENSE 2002-03 EXPENSE 2003-04 '1 EXPENSE ENCUMBERED ' THRU 09-30-04 1 THRU 09-30-04 1 SUBTOTAL 753,846.55 38,786,097.95 265,814.17 4,883,405.13 18,920,386.34 51,641,607.54 12,878,988.97 15,356,965.72 889,772.32 443,467.00 113,930.47 2,641,482.13 791,385.63 397,615.34 575,016.53 (485,325.77)1 149,597.63 4,589,606.29 11,671,442.11 109,609.73 1,832,392.06 379,661 .38 . 4,218,294.40 3,455,350.67 j 4,119,045.21 15,666,239.90 4,325,201.40 4,500,374.61 I I . 143,487, 112.37 1 5,852,669.42 ! 18,708,823.32 I 35,822,666.30 I I I I I 114,896.16 15,993,062.06 27,732.73 9,012.76 2,887,763.72 18,091,992.05 765,594.97 I 37,890,054.45 21,393.23 1,939,015.99 0.00 0.00 401,306.82 1 3,444,763.38 175,433.96 I 5,981,913.38 I I I 0.00 690,333.57 955,096.57 35,591,690.02 0.00 I 251,272.93 I 0.00 4,862,548.33 251,312.38 12,005,413.62 2,449,707.91 I 44,169,363.79 I 265,415.90 I 10,607,037.37 I 3,921,532.76 108,177,659.63 I ENDING ALLOCATION 09-30-04 63,512.98 3,194,407.93 14,541.25 20,856.80 6,914,972.72 7,472,243.75 2,271,951 .60 15,356,965.72 35,309,452.75 LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS BY FUND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 Fund Purchase Maturity Institution Interest Rate Type Principal Date Date Operating 09-30-04 TFN Bank of America 1.710% Repo 11 ,220,000.00 Operating 09-01-01 10-11-04 Twin City Bank 2.110% CD 4,640,334.89 Total 15,860,334.89 Activity Fund 09-16-04 TFN Bank of America 1.280% Repo 760,000.00 Total 760,000.00 Bond Account 09-06-04 03-07-05 Regions 1.843% CD 400,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 07-14-04 01-10-05 Metropolitan 1.930% CD 1,000,934.31 Capital Projects Fund 01-30-04 01-31-05 Bancorp South 1.850% CD 2,100,244.72 Capital Projects Fund 08-17-04 08-16-05 Twin City Bank 2.610% CD 11 ,000,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 06-10-04 01-10-05 Bank of America 1.670% Treasury Bills 5,385,005.84 Capital Projects Fund 08-02-04 02-05-05 Twin City Bank 2.580% CD 4,500,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 08-02-04 08-02-05 Twin City Bank 3.030% CD 4,500,000.00 Capital Projects Fund 05-03-04 11-05-04 Bank of the Ozarks 1.350% CD 3,076,650.06 Capital Projects Fund 09-15-04 03-15-05 Bank of the Ozarks 2.210% CD 10,366,251 .16 Capital Projects Fund 09-30-04 TFN Bank of America 1.540% Repo 2,140,000.00 Total 44,469,086.09 Deseg Plan Scholarship 06-22-04 12-08-04 Bank of America 1.600% Treasury Bills 779,103.78 Total 779,103.78 Rockefeller Scholarship 06-10-04 01-10-05 Bank of America 1.670% Treasury Bills 252,468.56 Total 252,468.56\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"hbcula_becu_34","title":"Voice of the Wildcats Newsletter, October 2004","collection_id":"hbcula_becu","collection_title":"Bethune-Cookman University Digital Collection","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Florida, Volusia County, Panama Beach, 28.86832, -81.22778"],"dcterms_creator":["Bethune-Cookman University"],"dc_date":["2004-10"],"dcterms_description":["The student newsletter of Bethune-Cookman College, now Bethune-Cookman University, highlighting student voices, campus and community activities, and current events."],"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":null,"dcterms_subject":["African American universities and colleges","African American students","Campus life","College student newspapers and periodicals","Civil rights movements"],"dcterms_title":["Voice of the Wildcats Newsletter, October 2004"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) Library Alliance"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["https://hbcudigitallibrary.auctr.edu/digital/collection/becu/id/34"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["All rights to images are held by the respective holding institution. This image is posted publicly for non-profit educational uses, excluding printed publication. For permission to reproduce images and/or for copyright information contact University Archives, Bethune-Cookman University, Daytona Beach, FL 32114 (386) 481-2186. https://www.cookman.edu/library/index.html"],"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"tws_oid16_31293","title":"Frederick Knight, 2004","collection_id":"tws_oid16","collection_title":"Crossroads interviews","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Tennessee, Shelby County, Memphis, 35.14953, -90.04898"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2004-09-24"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["video/mp4","application/pdf","image/jpeg"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":null,"dcterms_publisher":["Memphis, Tenn. : Rhodes College"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["https://vimeo.com/279730089"],"dcterms_subject":["Interviews","Oral history","Music","Memphis (Tenn.)","Stax Records"],"dcterms_title":["Frederick Knight, 2004"],"dcterms_type":["MovingImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Rhodes College"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://hdl.handle.net/10267/31293"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["oral histories (literary works)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"geh_vhpohr_280","title":"Oral history interview of William B. Paul","collection_id":"geh_vhpohr","collection_title":"Veterans History Project: Oral History Interviews","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Alabama, Montgomery County, Maxwell-Gunter Air Force Base, 32.38266, -86.35502","United States, Florida, Hillsborough County, MacDill Air Force Base, 27.8472, -82.50338","United States, Florida, Miami-Dade County, Miami Beach, 25.79065, -80.13005","United States, Georgia, 32.75042, -83.50018","United States, Georgia, Atlanta Metropolitan Area, 33.8498, 84.4383","United States, Georgia, Chattahoochee County, Fort Benning, 32.35237, -84.96882","United States, Louisiana, Rapides Parish, Alexandria, 31.31129, -92.44514","United States, Maryland, Prince George's County, Andrews AFB, 38.80531, -76.8746","United States, North Carolina, Richmond County, Mackall Army Airfield, 35.03097, -79.50276","United States, South Carolina, Sumter County, Shaw Air Force Base, 33.97473, -80.46786","United States, Texas, Howard County, Big Spring, 32.2504, -101.47874","United States, Texas, Tarrant County, Arlington, 32.73569, -97.10807"],"dcterms_creator":["Gardner, Robert D.","Paul, William B., 1925-2015"],"dc_date":["2004-09-16"],"dcterms_description":["In this interview, William Paul recalls his career in the U.S. Air Force during World War II and Korea. He describes his childhood and the effect of the war on his high school. He was sent to be part of a college training detachment until he was chosen for flight training. He became a bombardier and describes his training in detail. He discusses the Norden bombsight. He describes working with Chinese and Free French pilots, and being served by German POWs in the mess hall. He describes his post-war education and career until he was recalled as a reservist. He recounts his work for the OSI and his marriage to an Air Force nurse as well as his own career. He displays a book he has written entitled \"The Road he Chose.\" He discusses patriotism and the importance of service.","William Paul was in the United States Army Air Forces in World War II and the United States Air Force in Korea.","Bill Paul Veterans History Project Atlanta History Center Interviewer: Bob Gardner September 16, 2004 [Tape 1, Side A] Interviewer: [Asks veteran to tell about his experiences in World War II.] Paul: Actually, I was in two wars. I was an aviation cadet in the Army Air Corps, that's what it was called in World War II. And then later on, about five years after I got out of World War II, the Korean War started and I was recalled to active duty with the Air Force during the Korean War. Interviewer: Were you drafted or did you enlist, sir? Paul: No, I enlisted. I enlisted in the Air Corps during World War II and, of course, I was an officer in the Reserves when I was recalled during the Korean War. Interviewer: Where were you living at the time, sir? Paul: Well, the time I, at the time I went into World War II, I was living over in the community called Lakewood, just one of those little neighborhoods outside of Atlanta here at that time. Interviewer: Why did you join, sir? Paul: Well, I joined . . . my high school class was the class of 1942, the first graduating class after Pearl Harbor was attacked. And most of my classmates, my buddies and so forth, went right into the service. They were eighteen, seventeen, eighteen years old. But I was only sixteen. And to use the expression of the time, it pissed me off no end that they could go and I couldn't. So, I wanted to go, too. Out of the seven kids that played on the line of our football team for Fulton High here in Atlanta, not Fulton County, five of us went into the Army Air Corps. So some of those birds were writing me, a lot of talking about flying, which kind of made me mad. But anyhow, I had to wait. But I got in as early as they would take me. Interviewer: Why did you pick the service branch you joined, sir? Paul: Well, I guess part of it was I had a brother six years older than I and he was in the Army Air Corps, too, at the same time. And then…that was what most of the kids in my group wanted to do. They wanted to fly. And so that's where most of us went. Interviewer: Do you recall your first days in service? Paul: Yeah, I do. As I say, I was all eager to go. I thought I was. And they finally activated me about a month after my eighteenth birthday. I'd been in the Reserve, the inactive Reserve until then. And we got on a train and the train was headed down to Miami Beach, Florida. And about halfway down there, I started getting to be the most homesick little kid you'd ever seen. So that's the main thing I remember about my first days. I got over it in about two or three weeks, but I'll never forget that. Never wanted to go back to Miami Beach. Interviewer: Can you tell me about any of your boot camp or training experiences, sir? Paul: Well, actually, most people laugh when I tell them Miami Beach because they think that was a luxury affair. But at that time, that was a basic training camp for Air Force people. And most of us were pre-aviation cadets in that program. And we did a little close-order drill and things of that sort, but nothing of any real magnitude. They just taught how us to wear a uniform and worked us out every day, calisthenics and that sort of thing. There wasn't any great deal to it, frankly. Interviewer: Do you remember any of your instructors? Paul: Not from that area, no. Interviewer: How did you get through it? Paul: How did I do what? Interviewer: How did you get through the basic training? Paul: Well, it wasn't . . . like I say, it was pretty easy for us. Now they had all the hotels stripped on Collins Avenue. They had multitudes of hotels that had been taken over by the Air Force, Army Air Force and we had bunks and such as that. But I didn't find it very difficult. I was in pretty good physical shape for a kid in those days. Interviewer: Which wars did you actually serve in, sir? Paul: Well, I served in World War II and then I served in the Korean War later on. Interviewer: Where exactly did you go? Paul: Well, during World War II I went to Miami, as I said, on basic and then we left there and we were assigned. Air Force had a program at that time that if you were a kid like many of us were, just out of high school, they would send you first to various college training detachments around the country. They were at universities and colleges and you went there to take some physics courses and mathematics and so forth. And in my case, I was sent to Wofford College in Spartanburg, South Carolina. The . . . do you want me to go forward with the various places? I spent about four and a half months there. That would be . . . I would have gone there in early . . . about December of '43, cause I'd gone in in '43. I think it was January. But anyhow, I spent about four and a half months there. And that was just a . . . really a college life but run by the military. I'll tell you one interesting experience there I think would be interesting. I was selected at eighteen years old to be the cadet commandant, cadet commander, in the group. I tell people I had more responsibility when I eighteen years old that I've ever had since. And it's not far from the truth. But in any event, I was sort of in charge of the group. They had about four hundred cadets there at the time. And one night, it would have been about April, '44. The Air Force captain, who was the Air Force officer in charge, who lived on the base, he called me and told me to get everybody up to the chapel. So I did, in the middle of the night about two o'clock. And we got there and they said that, “We're gonna call off some names and the names we call I want you to fall out outside the chapel and get prepared to go get your belongings. We're gonna ship you out.” And after about twenty names were called, I recognized what it was. They were . . . it was the cadets in the cadet program who had been in the ground forces prior to that, infantry, artillery, and so forth. And they told them they were going to Camp McCall. I believe it was in South Carolina, which is where they trained hangar, not hangar but glider, glider troops. And you want to see a sad looking bunch of folks. They really were sad. So they shipped out and left. We didn't know it at the time, but of course, that was about two months before D-Day. And we learned later that they were getting ready for D-Day and they needed people to train to be glider troops. So anyhow, we spent about four and a half months at Wofford College and then we went out to Shaw Field, South Carolina, which was just a . . . sort of a holding pool for us cause they didn't have many at that time. At that time the Air Force had more cadets than they knew what to do with. So they sent us there and we spent maybe six weeks there. We were actually there when D-Day happened because I remember we woke up in the middle of the night and sirens were blowing and whistles were blowing, a big celebration and it was because the troops had landed on D-Day on Normandy. So then we went from there to pre-flight school. I went to pre-flight school in Maxwell Field, Alabama. That was the major flight, pre-flight school. That was primarily a school for ground training and also to determine who was gonna be classified as either pilots, bombardiers or navigators. Now the routine was pretty rigid. And they had a—one thing I like to mention is we had a very strict honor code in the aviation cadet program. And if you breach that honor code, you're gone. And not only gone, but you were gone in a very dramatic and embarrassing way. When someone had violated the honor code, they would wake us up in the middle of the night, start beating drums slowly, slowly, slowly and then up. That was a signal to get up and get dressed, including your socks and garters, and get in formation. And they would typically get everyone in formation, do an inspection, flashlight. Make sure you were dressed properly. It sounds corny, but it's part of the discipline. Then they would announce the name of the person who had violated the honor code and said they were gonna—it was pretty dramatic—they said they were gonna be eliminated from the aviation cadet program. His name would never again be mentioned in the Corps. And it sort of got to you, that you'd better obey the darned honor code if you wanted to continue the cadet program. So then we went, we spent about two months there. We left pre-flight. I was classified originally to be a pilot, which excited me no end, cause everybody wanted to be a pilot. I went to primary flight school. Here's a picture of us, of my group of aviation cadets at the primary flight school. It may be hard to see, but in the background there's a famous Steerman PT-17 trainer. It's a biplane, open-air cockpit plane. Now as I said, by that time the Army had more cadets than they knew what to do with, particularly for pilot training. Everybody wanted to be a pilot. And you had to be pretty much of a natural if you were gonna survive the training program. And I wasn't. I was just not a natural flyer. I learned that pretty soon. So they took me aside one day, said “Look. We're gonna reclassify you, if you're willing to do it.” Cause all of these were volunteer jobs, volunteer-only jobs. He said, “We can either send you to gunnery school to be a gunner or we'll reclassify you to be a bombardier.” So I said, “Well, I want to be a bombardier.” Cause bombardiers were officers and the gunners weren't. That was the main reason, I guess. So they needed bombardiers because they were really losing bombardiers real rapidly, more so than probably any other crew member of the airplane. I didn't know it at the time, but even if I did I was eighteen years old, so I didn't think it'd be me, you know. So anyhow, we went from there later on to bombardier school. We had a couple of pools. We'd just stay and wait till the openings came up in bomb school before we went because they had so many people in the program. And I think I could say I was a natural bombardier. I did great in bomb school. But before we went to bomb school, we were required to be qualified as an aerial gunner. Because in combat, a bombardier served two purposes. He was a gunner before and after he went on the bomb run and then on the bomb run he would settle down over the Norton bomb sight, do the bomb run, then he jumped back in the turret and became a gunner again. So we went to gunnery school in Harlingen, Texas. Right down on the Mexican border. What's called the Rio Grande Valley. The, it was a pretty interesting program. We started out with, I remember we started out with shotguns from the ground shooting skeet, just like you would, skeet shooters would. Then from there they mounted a shotgun on a pickup truck. You went around an oval and other cadets would flip the pigeons out and you'd try to hit it on the fly so you could get used to leading an aircraft, a fighter plane. And then after the shotgun phase, we went to, at one point we learned to fire Thompson submachine guns. I don't know why, but we did. I was pretty good with that. I couldn't hit anything with a .45 pistol, but I was pretty good with a Thompson sub. But we went, then we went on ground training with machine guns and then we finally got in the air. Now we trained in the air part of the program as gunners on the B-24. That's the reason I brought my little B-24 this morning because that's to, just my souvenir for that part of the, of my life. In the B-24, the bombardier was primarily trained in the Emerson nose turret. It was a great turret. It was a twin fifty caliber machine gun, electrically operated. You could swing it around in a flash, split second. Whereas some of the other turrets were much slower, particularly the tail turrets. We trained in all stations. In the waist gun, in the tail, in the top turret. But your primary duty was to learn to be very proficient in the Emerson nose turret. And I remember when we were in the air and I would be in that turret. Now here I was, I guess nineteen by that time, and I'd be up in the turret, and when you're in the turret of a B-24, you're so far ahead of the engines and the cockpit, that all you see is air. And every once in a while I'd swing the turret around, make damn sure I was up there [laughs] with somebody with me, because you were just by yourself. But it was kind of a thrill, you know, for a nineteen-year-old kid. And we did firing at sleeve targets. The aircraft would bring a, carry a sleeve target along and if you and I were there, I'd be, my shells would be tipped with red paint, yours blue, so you could tell who hit the sleeve and who didn't. Every once in a while we'd hit the lead plane. I never did that, thank God. But it did occur. We, then we did actual firing on fighter planes and made simulated passes on the B-24, but those were photo, of course. We didn't fire real bullets. They were photos. They could tell where you hit by the photo after you're on the ground. So that was some of the training we had and we probably, my group was probably the best trained gunners in the Air Force because they still didn't have room for us in bomb school or navigation school. Navigators had to go through this, too, by the way. And we took about four refresher courses just to give us something to do, I guess. But finally we finished that and we went on up to bomb school. One funny story; you indicated you might like some of these. It turned out, it could have been tragic, but it turned out to be funny, kind of funny. We were told when we landed and they parked the B-24 that you're supposed to elevate your weapons just in case there's a hot round in there that might go off. Most people did that. But one day we'd been up on a firing mission and we came back and we had our backpacks on and walked off the tarmac, and this kid, who was a real big-mouthed kid from up around Boston. He just talked all the damn time. Yak, yak, yak, yak. And we had our cloth caps on, cause you wore those so you could put your earphones on in the air. I don't remember his name now, but all of a sudden blam! Here comes this bullet and it hit his cap. It went right through his cap and knocked it off on the tarmac. Didn't touch him. And he was that far from being a dead duck. And I don't think he spoke another word during the entire training period. [laughs] But thank God it turned out to be funny instead of a fraction of a inch one side or the other cause it could've killed him. We went on to bomb school at Big Springs, Texas. That's out in northwest Texas. A lot of oil fields and mesquite bushes mostly. And one thing I'd like to mention is that in World War II if you were a bombardier, you had to take an oath. I brought it with me. I just printed this out from the Internet not long ago. You had to take a bombardier's oath because the Norton bomb sight was probably considered to be the most secret and probably the most, the best advantage that the Americans had in high level bombing. The bombardier's oath reads like this. It said [reading]: “Mindful of the secret trust about to be placed in me by my Commander-in-Chief, the President of the United States, by whose direction I have been chosen for bombardier training, and mindful of the fact that I am to become guardian of one of my country's most precious military assets, the American bomb sight, I do here in the presence of almighty God swear by the bombardier's code of honor to keep inviolate the secret of any and all confidential information revealed to me and further to uphold the honor and integrity of the Army Air Force if need be with my life itself.” That was an oath that I think most of us took petty seriously. We had, they gave us a .45 pistol. In training school it wasn't loaded, of course, but we wore the .45 pistol and we took the bomb sight to and from the airplane when it was [going to be] in the air. And when it was on the ground, we took the bomb sight away from it, away from the airplane. And we were instructed that if in combat, if we ever went down, our first duty—or if the plane was shot up and was going down—was to stick the .45 in the lens and pull the trigger so that the Norton sight would not be captured by the enemy. I don't know how many times that ever happened or whether it was captured, but that was what we were instructed to do. By the way, here's a little picture, too, of me when I was in bombardier school wearing a flight jacket. I think, yeah, I was nineteen at the time. Interviewer: Oh, that's wonderful. Paul: Okay. In bomb school, we bombed from a little AT-11 aircraft. It was a two-engine aircraft designed for training bombardiers. We used 100-pound bombs. Usually had about ten bombs, five on each side of the catwalk that went over the bomb bay. And we, it had an explosive charge in it where you could photograph and tell when you hit the target or not. They had targets that were sort of circular on the ground and you would, I've forgotten the term now. But based on how far you were from the center of the target. Every once in a while we had some problems over that because there were—well, when we bombed at night. Because the oil derricks out there for some ungodly reason were lighted almost like the target areas were. And on the Norton bomb sight, I don't know if you're familiar with it or not, but when you're quite a distance from your target, you went into what we called extended vision. So you could pick up roughly the target as you approached it and then you would gradually wind it in, because you'd have left it, if you didn't wind it in, when you dropped the bombs you're gonna be twenty degrees off on your target. And that can be, depending on your altitude, that can be a long way. Apparently on one or two occasions, a cadet forgot to wind in the extended vision tube, and every once in a while they'd clobber one of those oil derricks, which of course, as you might realize, didn't make the oil derrick people too happy. But there wasn't much of that. But we went through that, and I don't remember the exact times now, but I do remember this. I was number two in my class in bomb school. I was a lousy pilot but I became a good bombardier. And then we'd just finished with all the bombing we were gonna do. We were just sort of fiddling around there with loading. Go out and load a ramp, load the bombs for the new crop of cadets. So the cadets come in following you, you know, there was some new ones there and some old ones leaving when the war ended. When we came out, I'll never forget that day. We came out and were gonna do something with the airplane. We had to put some practice bombs on it for some of the new cadets. And they told us, “Take them off. They just dropped a bomb on Japan and wiped out half the island.” A slight exaggeration, but the A-bomb had been dropped. So that ended the war. Now in bombardier school, we did something that might be interesting to people to see this later on. Like all aviation cadets did, we had already gotten our caps. You wore, they wore, officers had a cap that had a grommet in it. Well, in the Air Force, air crews only, we didn't let, tried not to let what we call “ground pounders” do this. But Air Force only people, air crews, would take the grommet out of their hat. That was our mark. And the pretense was so that your earphones could fit over. But it really was a point of honor to the air crewman. So we would get, it was a tradition that about a month before graduation, whether you were gonna be a pilot, navigator or bombardier, you took, you bought a hat, kept it under your mattress so you'd get the 50-mission crush. [laughs] So this is one of the things that I thought was kind of funny. Isn't that funny how you remember those things? But I remember that. Am I going too fast? In any event, I got something else I was gonna say. Oh, I might mention this, too. I remember when that happened, V-J Day. Of course, in the cadet corps we were really on strict provisions all the time about wearing the uniform properly and all that sort of thing. And, of course, during World War II, you had to wear your uniform off base as well as on base. Twenty-four hours a day, you wore it. But I remember that night, there was a celebration going on and some idiot had gone out and found him a civilian costume and a pair of roller skates. And he was roller skating all over the cadet mess hall. And one of the more interesting things I thought there too, this is what I was trying to remember, is in our cadet mess hall then, we had, well, in the training program in bomb school, we had not only American cadets, we had Brazilian cadets training there, we had three of Chiang Kai-shek's Chinese there and we had three French cadets. Now this was after the war in Europe was over. But the French were still training to be bombardiers against Japan. And then we had German POWs serving the food in the mess hall. They were still, they were Africa Corps guys. We'd captured a bunch of them. They still were allowed to wear their white caps, white hats symbolic of their Africa Corps, and they were serving the food. And I can still remember going through behind one of the little French guys, and you could just read his mind almost. He wanted to jump over that counter and cut that German's throat. Of course, nothing happened. If it did, he'd have been gone. In fact, one of the French kids did get washed out right away in bomb school because he went up on a bomb run, on a bomb training run, and he came back down, and typically the instructor would take you up to the nose when you got on the ground and tell you what you'd done wrong and so forth. And he was, maybe he got a little overzealous and castigated this young Frenchman, and the Frenchman grabbed a wrench and just tore the bomb sight all to pieces. Now that wasn't typical of the French cadets. Most of them were very cool, calm, and dedicated soldiers. But nobody ever knew what happened to him, but I'm sure it wasn't too good. So anyhow, bombardier school ended and they called us together within a week of that and said, “Look. We'll give you a choice. You can go ahead and graduate, but if you do you're gonna have a reserve commitment for at least four years. Or you can get out as aviation cadets.” I chose the latter cause I wanted to go to school. So that was my World War II career in a nutshell. I didn't get any great ribbons. That's the reason I wear my souvenirs on today to remind me of my experience. I didn't get any of that because I never saw combat. So after that, I got out. I went to Emory Law School here in Atlanta and got a law degree. I went on the G.I. Bill. And that's why I've often said World War II is the best thing that ever happened to this man because it gave me an opportunity to know what I could do competing with other people and it gave me the G.I. Bill. So I went to Emory and got a law degree. Practiced law about two years. I was in the Air Force Reserve and I was recalled to the Korean War. Now, I was a Air National Guardsman, 116, 154, AC and W group based at Dobbins Air Base here in Atlanta. And I went on active duty with that group. We were recalled for twenty-one months. That was the, what we expected to be kept on, how long we expected to be kept, with the understanding it could be extended depending upon the war, progress of the war. My first work on active duty during that—I was a second lieutenant at the time—was to be, I was squadron adjutant to one of the squadrons. But then I heard about OSI. This time the Air Force was a separate group, separate military, arm of the military service. I went on active duty and I heard about OSI. And that's an interesting story in itself. I'll try to be brief but tell it. After World War II, some of the inevitable, in some of the inevitable Congressional investigations, they learned that there was a procurement general, I don't recall his name now, but it was in the Army, that had been stealing the Army blind. And they also learned that, in the Army during World War II they had a division called Criminal Investigation Division and Counter Intelligence Corps people. And the CID guys knew he was doing it, but they were under his command. So every time they would try to get a report through, zap! He would block it and I'm sure most of them wound up being transferred to another station. But, so the Congress basically told the Air Force, “We're gonna make you a separate service. We don't want this happening. And we want you to set up an independent, relatively independent organization that is not under the command of any of the field officers, that's simply under the command of an OSI director who'll be based at . . . .” I think it was Bolling Field or Andrews, one of those just outside of Washington. So that's what they did. Now they brought over to organize it and to run it, made a brigadier general out of one of J. Edgar Hoover's most trusted confidants or assistants, and he organized it. And they had the same similar divisions in it. They had the CID. They didn't call it CID, but some people did criminal investigations mostly. Some did counter intelligence work. And I got interested in that, so I requested a transfer into OSI and I was given a transfer as a special agent in the OSI. We did not wear uniforms. We never wore uniforms. I've got a couple pictures here to show, I guess. This is before I went into OSI, when we were out on a field maneuver before I was an OSI agent. And this is a picture after I went into OSI, the day before I was married, as a matter of fact, to an Air Force nurse. So you see I'm wearing civvies. Now this is a picture of my wife and I. Again, before OSI. After we were married. Taken at Lookout Mountain. She was a second lieutenant in the Army, I mean Air Force Nurse Corps. This is a picture of my wife the day before we were married. She's in the nurse's sort of fatigue clothes in Alexandria, Louisiana. Oh, excuse me. Okay? Interviewer: [inaudible] It's fine. Okay. Thank you. Paul: Let's see. Where was I? Oh. In OSI. I liked that. I really enjoyed being in OSI. In fact, I'm still in the Association of Former Special Agents OSI. That's this little button I have on my lapel today. And I guess one thing I liked about it is we didn't have to wear uniforms all the time. Our rank was classified and we had civilian agents. We had noncoms who were agents, sergeants. We had officers, commissioned officers who were agents. But we all carried the same credentials. It just showed, “Mr. Paul” and whoever you were. [Did not show] whether you were colonel or whether you were buck private. And it was a great group of people. I really enjoyed it. Again, I didn't do anything that's particularly exciting in that. A lot of time doing background investigations for top secret and for crypto clearances. But other than that, I really didn't do anything particularly exciting. But I really enjoyed the experience. It was a great experience. Every once in a while, you would get challenged on whether your rank was classified or not. I remember once I had the obligation, at the time I was a first lieutenant, to take a lieutenant colonel over to Fort Benning for a polygraph test. And he wasn't too happy about going, and kept demanding my rank, and, of course, I kept telling him, “Sorry, sir. It's classified. I can't let you have it.” [laughs] But you ran into things like that. But by and all, it was a very effective group. Now in OSI, if we did have some, what they refer to as—I've forgotten the term now, but anyhow, indicating some violation of the law or security—we sent reports to the field commander. We sent him a copy. But we sent the original report direct to Washington, so it couldn't be intercepted and anything and any hanky panky dealt with it. One of the things that was an OSI responsibility occasionally was to do a, to try to break the security clearance of an air base. And they did one while I was in OSI at MacDill Field where I was stationed at the time. The idea was to try to penetrate the security and get on base as would an espionage agent. The evening we chose to do it was Christmas Eve. Well you can imagine how much resistance there was because it wasn't like today, when you had the terrorist threat or anything like that. But it was just like taking candy from a baby. And these were the kind of projects that every once in a while you went on. Now some of the agents, the CIC agents in particularly, did some good work during the war. As a matter of fact, generally credit has been given to an OSI agent for having been the first to contact MacArthur's headquarters when the Koreans came into South Korea from the north, which started, of course, the Korean War. When that was just a baby organization. It'd only been, OSI had only been in existence maybe a year at that time. So anyhow, I met my wife. We were married. We were married on Alexandria Air Force Base where she was based at the time. And we were married in a portable chapel, and when my wife went back down to take a picture of our wedding church two weeks later, it'd already been dismantled and shipped overseas. Anyhow, she and I came home. She got out of the service, too. She got pregnant with my son and she was released from the Air Force. Now I came back home and went back into law practice. Actually, I didn't go right in at the beginning cause I was broke, my wife was pregnant, and I needed to make some money right away. And I was always sort of maverick at law practice. I didn't want to be in big firms. But I ran into Jimmy Grizzard, who had been my group commander in active duty, a lawyer in Atlanta, and he demanded to know what I was doing and of course, I told him. He said, “Come on up to my office. You're gonna practice law.” So he put me in an office. No charge, no nothing. He got me back into law practice. So, that's basically what I've done in my life. I practiced law for forty-six years. I think I was a good lawyer. The, I'll brag a little bit. I was one of only two lawyers in my specialty to be listed in the first two editions of a book called Best Lawyers in America, which has become the one every lawyer would like to be in. [laughs] And so I'm happy with the career. We've had three children. My son is a rheumatologist in Alabama, and my two daughters are—one lives in Roswell, one lives in New York. And we have six grandkids. Have I missed anything? [laughs] Interviewer: No, sir. Did you make any close friendships while you were in the service? Paul: Yeah, I did make some. Unfortunately, most of them I've been out of touch with. There's one Italian-American kid. He and I became close friends and we went through bomb school together and he and I stay in touch pretty much. But the people in this picture, I wish to God I'd kept in better touch. The picture, the people in this group picture, in my primary flying school, I don't recall a single name. I don't recall who they were and where they were. You might want to note here, I'm in the right of the center there, right in the middle of that picture. Third from the left on second row. Okay? Interviewer: It's out of focus again. Paul: My nerves. What's left of them. Interviewer: Did you join any kind of a veterans organization, sir? Paul: Yeah. After World War Two I joined a American Legion and I stayed active in it for a while. And then I'm currently in a veterans organization, the Association of Former Special Agents of the OSI, as I mentioned earlier. Interviewer: What kind of activities does your post or association have, sir? Paul: Well, they do a convention every year. They do a lot of, they have a web site they use. In fact, they try to keep in touch to some degree with each other. In fact, I'd like to mention here something that's in connection with that. I wrote a, about four years ago, I wrote a World War Two, I mean I wrote a historical novel. And here's a copy of the book. It's called The Road He Chose. I wrote it primarily in memory of five of my boyhood friends who were killed in World War Two. But the reason I mention the connection with OSI Association, they asked me to write a story about the experience of doing a novel and I did. And just last week, for example, I got an email from one of the OSI agents who had kept that story and was now preparing to do a novel and is using the information I gave him, which helped, I think. I think it was one of the things that made it worthwhile. I'd like to also just mention one thing before I get off the record here. I'm now engaged, almost at the end of it, in a project very similar to the one you're doing and it's done, we're doing oral history projects for the alumni of Emory Law School, my law school, who were also World War Two veterans. And I've been doing all the interviewing, except for my own interview, of course. I've done, we've only done about twenty-five, cause most of our people are gone really, in ill health, too. But I really enjoyed doing that. I think it was one of the most satisfying things I've done. But I haven't been to any of the conventions of OSI because, as I said, I was one of the babies of the OSI program, and those fellas had so much more experiences, so much greater experience than I did. I sort of feel like the unwanted child at the family reunion maybe. [laughs] Probably not, but that's the way I feel. Interviewer: Did your military experience influence your thinking about war or about the military in general, sir? Paul: Well, yeah. Of course, it, I was, we had ROTC and junior ROTC in high school here at that time. But I didn't know much about the military and I think I learned a great deal about it. I think it did wonders for me. As I say, I think it's the best thing to happen to me, going into the military service. Taught me a little discipline. It also taught me, I went in with what really I think that could honestly be called the cream of the crop of American youth in those days. And I learned that I could compete with any of them. I grew up in a family which, you know, blue collar family. We didn't have much money. All of a sudden, I realized I could probably do as well as they could. It gave me confidence. Plus, I think it was a duty that should be done. Interviewer: How did your service and experiences affect your life, sir? Paul: Well, the callback in 1951 interrupted my career. But again, probably did the best day of work I ever did in my life when I met my wife, so that made it worth it. I think it [changed me] for the better. I think it made me a better patriot. I think it made me a better person. And I wouldn't change a bit if I had the opportunity. Interviewer: Is there anything you'd like to add that we haven't covered in this interview, sir? Paul: You don't want me to get on my political bandwagon. [laughs] Well, no. I don't really think so. But I might. Have I got any time left? Interviewer: Yeah. Paul: Yeah. I really don't think there's much more to add. I'm concerned at today's world, about whether we still have the wherewithal to face serious threats like we're in today. I hope I'm wrong about that because in my case, I remember in World War Two, everybody was ready to rally to the flag. In fact, I saw a little difference in the Korean War because, as you may know, it's often called the forgotten war, because as compared to my experience of World War Two, very few people seemed interested in it except people who were in the service and those who had family in the service. And I see a little of that now and it bothers me. But hopefully I'm wrong about it. But I think the, I think personally this country would be much better off if we had some kind of requirement for young men, at least. I'm still in the old Victorian age, I don't include women in this, but the young men, it would be very helpful, not only for the country but for them, if they could spend at least a year or something in military service. It really would be good for them. But whether that'll ever happen or not, who knows. But I want to thank you for letting me do this interview today. I appreciate it. [end of tape]"],"dc_format":["video/quicktime"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":null,"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Veterans History Project oral history recordings","Veterans History Project collection, MSS 1010, Kenan Research Center, Atlanta History Center"],"dcterms_subject":["World War, 1939-1945--Personal narratives, American","Stearman airplanes","B-24 (Bomber)","Paul, Janice Lee Osborne","Wofford College (Spartanburg, S.C.)","Georgia. Air National Guard. Tactical Fighter Wing, 54th","United States. National Guard Bureau. Fighter Group. 116th","United States. Air Force. Office of Special Investigations","United States. Army. Criminal Investigation Division","Big Springs (Tex.)","Consolidated B-24 Liberator (Bomber)"],"dcterms_title":["Oral history interview of William B. Paul"],"dcterms_type":["MovingImage"],"dcterms_provenance":["Atlanta History Center"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://album.atlantahistorycenter.com/cdm/ref/collection/VHPohr/id/280"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["This material is protected by copyright law. (Title 17, U.S. Code) Permission for use must be cleared through the Kenan Research Center at the Atlanta History Center. Licensing agreement may be required."],"dcterms_medium":["video recordings (physical artifacts)","mini-dv"],"dcterms_extent":["45:58"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_974","title":"Report: ''Student Achievement,'' North Little Rock School District","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":null,"dc_date":["2004-09-16"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st Century","School districts--Arkansas--North Little Rock","Education--Arkansas","Education--Evaluation","Educational statistics","School improvement programs"],"dcterms_title":["Report: ''Student Achievement,'' North Little Rock School District"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/974"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["reports"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nThe transcript for this item was created using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"nge_ngen_civil-rights-movement","title":"Civil Rights Movement","collection_id":"nge_ngen","collection_title":"New Georgia Encyclopedia","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, Georgia, 32.75042, -83.50018"],"dcterms_creator":["Tuck, Stephen"],"dc_date":["2004-09-09"],"dcterms_description":["Encyclopedia article about the civil rights movement in the American South, one of the most significant and successful social movements in the modern world. Black Georgians formed part of this southern movement for full civil rights and the wider national struggle for racial equality. From Atlanta to the most rural counties in Georgia's southwest Cotton Belt, black activists protested white supremacy in a myriad of ways--from legal challenges and mass demonstrations to strikes and self-defense. In many ways, the results were remarkable. As late as World War II (1941-45) black Georgians were effectively denied the vote, segregated in most areas of daily life, and subject to persistent discrimination and often violence. But by 1965, sweeping federal civil rights legislation prohibited segregation and discrimination, and this new phase of race relations was first officially welcomed into Georgia by Governor Jimmy Carter in 1971.","The Civil Rights Digital Library received support from a National Leadership Grant for Libraries awarded to the University of Georgia by the Institute of Museum and Library Services for the aggregation and enhancement of partner metadata.","GSE identifier: SS2H1"],"dc_format":null,"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":null,"dcterms_publisher":null,"dc_relation":["Forms part of the New Georgia Encyclopedia."],"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Forms part of the New Georgia Encyclopedia."],"dcterms_subject":["Civil rights movements--Georgia"],"dcterms_title":["Civil Rights Movement"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["New Georgia Encyclopedia (Project)"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["https://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/history-archaeology/civil-rights-movement/"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":["If you wish to use content from the NGE site for commercial use, publication, or any purpose other than fair use as defined by law, you must request and receive written permission from the NGE. Such requests may be directed to: Permissions/NGE, University of Georgia Press, 330 Research Drive, Athens, GA 30602."],"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":["Cite as: \"Civil Rights Movement,\" New Georgia Encyclopedia. Retrieved [date]: http://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org."],"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["articles"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":null},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_112","title":"Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118"],"dcterms_creator":["Arkansas. Department of Education"],"dc_date":["2004-09"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System."],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Little Rock (Ark.). Office of Desegregation Monitoring","School integration--Arkansas","Arkansas. Department of Education","Project managers--Implements"],"dcterms_title":["Arkansas Department of Education's (ADE's) Project Management Tool"],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/112"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":null,"dcterms_medium":["documents (object genre)"],"dcterms_extent":null,"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\nLittle Rock School District, plaintiff vs. Pulaski County Special School District, defendant\nArkansas DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ~ STATE CAPITOL MALL  LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 -1071  (501) 682-H75  http://arkedu.s1a1e.ar.us Dr. Kenneth James, Director of Education September 30, 2004 Mr.M. SamuelJones,ill Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 200 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Mr. Christopher Heller Rf Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark Cf fVfO 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 02\n1 - 200\nMr. Stephen W. Jones DESE OFFICEpF Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones GREGAT/ON i,tONITORJNG 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. U.S. District Court No. 4:82-CV-866 Dear Gentlemen: Per ail agreement with the Attorney General's Office, I am filing the Arkansas Department of Education's Project Management Tool for the month of September 2004 in the above-referenced case. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, General Counsel Arkansas Department of Education SS:law cc: Mark Hagemeier .A TE BOARD OF EDUCATION, Ch,\n, - JoNoll Coldw,11, Ulllo R0\u0026lt;k  Vie, C .. 1'. Jmn, Wo,tmo,..Jaod, Mkaddphlo Members: Sherry Burrow, Jonesboro  Shelby Hillman, Carlisle  Calvin King, Marianna  Randy Lawson, Bentonville MaryJane Rebick, Little Rock  Diane Tatum, Pine Bluff  Naccaman Williams, Johnson An Equal Opportunity Employer .\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of the ADE's Project Management Tool for September 2004. Respectfully Submitted, '--s'cott Smilli, Bar # 92251 General Counsel, Arkansas Department of Education #4 Capitol Mall, Room 404-A Little Rock, AR 72201 501-682-4227 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Scott Smith, certify that on September 30, 2004, I caused the foregoing document to be served by depositing a copy in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to each of the following: Mr. M. Samuel Jones, III Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 200 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. l 723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENOR$ KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL RECEIVED O'\"'T 1 - 2004 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION l,1ONITORING In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. - IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Based on the information available at AuQust 31, 2004, the ADE calculated the Equalization Funding for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Basedo-n theinforrriation available at August 31', 2004, the ADE calculated for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. C. Process and distribute State MFPA. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 On AuQust 31, 2004, distributions of State Equalization Funding for FY 04/05 were as follows: LRSD - $5,916,608 NLRSD - $3,027,651 PCSSD - $5,432,019 The allotments of State Equalization FundinQ calculated for FY 04/05 at August 31, 2004, subject to periodic adjustments, were as follows: LRSD - $59, 166,086 NLRSD - $30,276,517 PCSSD - $54,320,195 D. Determine the number of Magnet students residing in each District and attending a Magnet School. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at August 31, 2004 for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as ordered by the Court. 2 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Basedonthe.fnformairon available, the ADE calculated at August 31, 2004 for.FY 04/05, subjept to periodic adjustments. It should be noted that currently the Magnet Review Committee is reporting this information instead of the staff attorney as indicated in the Implementation Plan. F. Calculate state aid due the LRSD based upon the Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at August 31, 2004 for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. G. Process and distribute state aid for Magnet Operational Charge. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Distributions for FY 04/05 at August 31, 2004, totaled $1,118,660. Allotment calculated for FY 04/05 was $12,305,260 subject to periodic adjustments. H. Calculate the amount of M-to-M incentive money to which each school district is entitled. 1 . Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Calculated for FY 02/03, subject to periodic adjustments. I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, September - June. 3 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) I. Process and distribute M-to-M incentive checks. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Distributions forJ:Y 03/04 atAugust31, 2004,_were: LRSD - $4, 149, 129 NLRSD - $3,771,548 PCSSD - $11,589,336 The allotments calculated for FY 03/04 at August 31, 2004, subject to periodic adjustments, were: LRSD - $4, 149, 129 NLRSD - $3,771,548 PCSSD - $11,589,336 J. Districts submit an estimated Magnet and M-to-M transportation budget to ADE. 1. Projected Ending Date 2. Ongoing, December of each year. Actual as of September 30, 2004 In September 2002, the Magnet and M-to-M transportation budgets for FY 02/03 were submitted to the ADE by the Districts. K. The Coordinator of School Transportation notifies General Finance to pay districts for the Districts' proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 In January 2004, General Finance was notified to pay the second one-third payment for FY 03/04 to the Districts. It should be noted that the Transportation Coordinator is currently performing this function instead of Reginald Wilson as indicated in the Implementation Plan. L. ADE pays districts three equal installments of their proposed budget. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 4 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) L. ADE pays districts three equal installments of their proposed budget. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 In September 2003, General Finance made the last one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 02/03 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 2003, the following had been paid for FY 02/03: LRSD - $3,835,562.00 NLRSD - $742,399.62 PCSSD - $2,252,050.92 In September 2003, General Finance made the first one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 03/04 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At September 2003, the following had been paid for FY 03/04: LRSD - $1,243,841.33 NLRSD - $263,000.00 PCSSD - $727,406.63 In February 2004, General Finance made the second one-third payment to the Districts for their FY 03/04 transportation budget. The budget is now paid out in three equal installments. At February 2004, the following had been paid for FY 03/04: LRSD - $2,487,682.66 NLRSD - $526,000.00 PCSSD - $1,454,813.26 M. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. 1 . Projected Ending Date Ongoing, annually. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 In August 1997, the ADE transportation coordinator reviewed each district's Magnet and M-to-M transportation costs for FY 96/97. In July 1998, each district was asked to submit an estimated budget for the 98/99 school year. 5 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) M. N. ADE verifies actual expenditures submitted by Districts and reviews each bill with each District's transportation coordinator. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) In September 1998, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 98/99 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. School districts should receive payment by October 1, 1998 In July 1999, each district submitted an estimated budget for the 99/00 school year. In September 1999, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 99/00 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2000, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 00/01 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2001, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 01/02 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2002, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 02/03 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. In September 2003, paperwork was generated for the first payment in the 03/04 school year for the Magnet and M-to-M transportation program. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as stated in Exhibit A of the Implementation Plan. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 In FY 94/95, the State purchased 52 buses at a cost of $1,799,431 which were added to or replaced existing Magnet and M-to-M buses in the Districts. The buses were distributed to the Districts as follows: LRSD - 32\nNLRSD - 6\nand PCSSD -14. The ADE purchased 64 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $2,334,800 in FY 95/96. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 45\nNLRSD - 7\nand PCSSD -12. In May 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $646,400. 6 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) In July 1997, the ADE purchased 16 Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $624,879. In July 1998, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $695,235. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD- 6. Specifications for 16 school buses have been forwarded to state purchasing for bidding in January, 1999 for delivery in July, 1999. The ADE accepted a bid on 16 buses for the Magnet and M/M transportation program. The buses will be delivered after July 1, 1999 and before August 1, 1999. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nPCSSD - 6. In July 1999, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $718,355. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD-6. In July 2000, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses at a cost of $724,165. The buses were distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8\nNLRSD - 2\nand PCSSD- 6. The bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was let by State Purchasing on February 22, 2001. The contract was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include two type C 47 passenger buses and fourteen type C 65 passenger buses. Prices on these units are $43,426.00 each on the 47 passenger buses, and $44,289.00 each on the 65 passenger buses. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 2 of the 47 passenger and 4 of the 65 passenger buses. On August 2, 2001, the ADE took possession of 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $706,898. In June 2002, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include five 47 passenger buses for $42, 155.00 each, ten 65 passenger buses for $43,850.00 each, and one 47 passenger bus with a wheelchair lift for $46,952.00. The total amount was $696,227. 7 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) N. Purchase buses for the Districts to replace existing Magnet and M-to-M fleets and to provide a larger fleet for the Districts' Magnet and M-to-M Transportation needs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) In August of 2002, the ADE purchased 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses. The total amount paid was $696,227. Specifications for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M school buses have been forwarded to State Purchasing for bidding. Bids will be opened on May 12, 2003. The buses will have a required delivery date after July 1, 2003 and before August 8, 2003. In June 2003, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The buses to be purchased include 5 - 47 passenger buses for $47,052.00 each, and 11 - 65 passenger buses for $48,895.00 each. The total amount was $773,105. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8 of the 65 passenger\nNLRSD - 2 of the 65 passenger\nPCSSD - 5 of the 47 passenger and 1 of the 65 passenger buses. In June 2004, a bid for 16 new Magnet and M-to-M buses was awarded to Ward Transportation Services, Inc. The price for the buses was $49,380 each for a total cost of $790,080. The buses will be distributed accordingly: LRSD - 8, NLRSD - 2, and PCSSD - 6. 0. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to LRSD as required by page 23 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 and January 1, of each school year through January 1, 1999. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Obligation fulfilled in FY 96/97. P. Process and distribute additional payments in lieu of formula to LRSD as required by page 24 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. 8 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) Q. Process and distribute payments to PCSSD as required by Page 28 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1 , 1994. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Final payment was distributed July 1994. R. Upon loan request by LRSD accompanied by a promissory note, the ADE makes loans to LRSD. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing through July 1, 1999. See Settlement Agreement page 24. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 The LRSD received $3,000,000 on September 10, 1998. As of this reporting date, the LRSD has received $20,000,000 in loan proceeds. S. Process and distribute payments in lieu of formula to PCSSD required by page 29 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. T. Process and distribute compensatory education payments to NLRSD as required by page 31 of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date July 1 of each school year through June 30, 1996. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Obligation fulfilled in FY 95/96. 9 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) u. Process and distribute check to Magnet Review Committee. 1. Projected Ending Date Payment due date and ending July 1, 1995. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $75,000. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 99/00. Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 00/01 . Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01/02 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $92,500. This was the total amount due to the Magnet Review Committee for FY 04/05. V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring. 1. Projected Ending Date Not applicable. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Distribution in July 1997 for FY 97/98 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 97/98. Distribution in July 1998 for FY 98/99 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 98/99. Distribution in July 1999 for FY 99/00 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 99/00. 10 I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) V. Process and distribute payments for Office of Desegregation Monitoring.(Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued} Distribution in July 2000 for FY 00/01 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 00/01. Distribution in August 2001 for FY 01 /02 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 01/02. Distribution in July 2002 for FY 02/03 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 02/03. Distribution in July 2003 for FY 03/04 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 03/04. Distribution in July 2004 for FY 04/05 was $200,000. This was the total amount due to the ODM for FY 04/05. 11 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. 1. Projected Ending Date January 15, 1995 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 In May 1995, monitors completed the unannounced visits of schools in Pulaski County. The monitoring process involved a qualitative process of document reviews, interviews, and observations. The monitoring focused on progress made since the announced monitoring visits. In June 1995, monitoring data from unannounced visits was included in the July Semiannual Report. Twenty-five per cent of all classrooms were visited, and all of the schools in Pulaski County were monitored. All principals were interviewed to determine any additional progress since the announced visits. The July 1995 Monitoring Report was reviewed by the ADE administrative team, the Arkansas State Board of Education, and the Districts and filed with the Court. The report was formatted in accordance with the Allen Letter. In October 1995, a common terminology was developed by principals from the Districts and the Lead Planning and Desegregation staff to facilitate the monitoring process. The announced monitoring visits began on November 14, 1995 and were completed on January 26, 1996. Copies of the preliminary Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the ADE administrative team and the State Board of Education in January 1996. A report on the current status of the Cycle 5 schools in the ECOE process and their school improvement plans was filed with the Court on February 1, 1996. The unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1996 and ended on May 10, 1996. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and the data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The Districts provided data on enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Districts and the ADE Desegregation Monitoring staff developed a definition for instructional programs. 12 11. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued} The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996 with copies distributed to the parties. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996 and concluded in December 1996. In January 1997, presentations were made to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties to review the draft Semiannual Monitoring Report. The monitoring instrument and process were evaluated for their usefulness in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on achievement disparities. In February 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was filed. Unannounced monitoring visits began on February 3, 1997 and concluded in May 1997. In March 1997, letters were sent to the Districts regarding data requirements for the July 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and the additional discipline data element that was requested by the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Desegregation data collection workshops were conducted in the Districts from March 28, 1997 to April 7, 1997. A meeting was conducted on April 3, 1997 to finalize plans for the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report. Onsite visits were made to Cycle 1 schools who did not submit accurate and timely data on discipline, M-to-M transfers, and policy. The July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were finalized in June 1997. In July 1997, the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were filed with the court, and the ADE sponsored a School Improvement Conference. On July 10, 1997, copies of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were made available to the Districts for their review prior to filing it with the Court. In August 1997, procedures and schedules were organized for the monitoring of the Cycle 2 schools in FY 97/98. 13 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) A Desegregation Monitoring and School Improvement Workshop for the Districts was held on September 10, 1997 to discuss monitoring expectations, instruments, data collection and school improvement visits. On October 9, 1997, a planning meeting was held with the desegregation monitoring staff to discuss deadlines, responsibilities, and strategic planning issues regarding the Semiannual Monitoring Report. Reminder letters were sent to the Cycle 2 principals outlining the data collection deadlines and availability of technical assistance. In October and November 1997, technical assistance visits were conducted, and announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 2 schools were completed. In December 1997 and January 1998, technical assistance visits were conducted regarding team visits, technical review recommendations, and consensus building. Copies of the infusion document and perceptual surveys were provided to schools in the ECOE process. The February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report was submitted for review and approval to the State Board of Education, the Director, the Administrative Team, the Attorney General's Office, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. Unannounced monitoring visits began in February 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process, external team visits and finalizing school improvement plans. On February 18, 1998, the representatives of all parties met to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. Additional meetings will be scheduled. Unannounced monitoring visits were conducted in March 1998, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process and external team visits. In April 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were conducted, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. 14 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) In May 1998, unannounced monitoring visits were completed, and technical assistance was provided on the school improvement process. On May 18, 1998, the Court granted the ADE relief from its obligation to file the July 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report to develop proposed modifications to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. In June 1998, monitoring information previously submitted by the districts in the Spring of 1998 was reviewed and prepared for historical files and presentation to the Arkansas State Board. Also, in June the following occurred: a) The Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed, b) the Semiannual Monitoring COE Data Report was completed, c) progress reports were submitted from previous cycles, and d.) staff development on assessment (SAT-9) and curriculum alignment was conducted with three supervisors. In July, the Lead Planner provided the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee with (1) a review of the court Order relieving ADE of its obligation to file a July Semiannual Monitoring Report, and (2) an update of ADE's progress toward work with the parties and ODM to develop proposed revisions to ADE's monitoring and reporting obligations. The Committee encouraged ODM, the parties and the ADE to continue to work toward revision of the monitoring and reporting process. In August 1998, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Attorney General, the Ass.istant Director for Accountability and the Education Lead Planner updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and proposed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. In September 1998, tentative monitoring dates were established and they will be finalized once proposed revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring Plan are finalized and approved. In September/October 1998, progress was being made on the proposed revisions to the monitoring process by committee representatives of all the Parties in the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement. While the revised monitoring plan is finalized and approved, the ADE monitoring staff will continue to provide technical assistance to schools upon request. 15 11. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) In December 1998, requests were received from schools in PCSSD regarding test score analysis and staff Development. Oak Grove is scheduled for January 21, 1999 and Lawson Elementary is also tentatively scheduled in January. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD has been rescheduled for April 2000. Staff development regarding test score analysis for Oak Grove and Lawson Elementary in the PCSSD was conducted on May 5, 2000 and May 9, 2000 respectively. Staff development regarding classroom management was provided to the Franklin Elementary School in LRSD on November 8, 2000. Staff development regarding ways to improve academic achievement was presented to College Station Elementary in PCSSD on November 22, 2000. On November 1, 2000, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. The Assistant Director for Accountability updated the group on all relevant desegregation legal issues and discussed revisions to monitoring and reporting activities during the quarter. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for February 27, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group meeting that was scheduled for February 27 had to be postponed. It will be rescheduled as soon as possible. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting is scheduled for June 27, 2001. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from June 27. It will take place on July 26, 2001 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 16 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On July 26, 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 11, 2001 in room 201-A at the ADE. On October 11, 2001, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, discussed the ADE's intent to take a proactive role in Desegregation Monitoring. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 10, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. The Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting that was scheduled for January 10 was postponed. It has been rescheduled for February 14, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On February 12, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 11, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. On April 11, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 11, 2002 in room 201-A at the ADE. 17 II. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On July 18, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, talked about section XV in the Project Management Tool (PMT) on Standardized Test Selection to Determine Loan Forgiveness. She said that the goal has been completed, and no additional reporting is required for section XV. Mr. Morris discussed the court case involving the LRSD seeking unitary status. He handed out a Court Order from May 9, 2002, which contained comments from U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson Jr., about hearings on the LRSD request for unitary status. Mr. Morris also handed out a document from the Secretary of Education about the No Child Left Behind Act. There was discussion about how this could have an affect on Desegregation issues. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 10, 2002 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from October 10. It will take place on October 29, 2002 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. On October 29, 2002, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Meetings with the parties to discuss possible revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan will be postponed by request of the school districts in Pulaski County. Additional meetings could be scheduled after the Desegregation ruling is finalized. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 9, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On January 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. No Child Left Behind and the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD were discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for April 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. The quarterly Implementation Phase Working Group meeting was rescheduled from April 10. It will take place on April 24, 2003 in room 201-A at 1 :30 p.m. at the ADE. 18 11. MONITORING COMPENSATORY EDUCATION (Continued) A. Begin testing and evaluating the monitoring instrument and monitoring system to assure that data is appropriate and useful in monitoring the impacts of compensatory education programs on disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On April 24, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Laws passed by the legislature need to be checked to make sure none of them impede desegregation. Ray Lumpkin was chairman of the last committee to check legislation. Since he left, we will discuss the legislation with Clearence Lovell. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for July 10, 2003 at 1 :30 p.m. in room 201-A at the ADE. On August 28, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. The Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD was discussed. The LRSD has been instructed to submit evidence showing progress in reducing disparities in academic achievement for black students and white students. This is supposed to be done by March of 2004, so that the LRSD can achieve unitary status. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for October 9, 2003 at the ADE. On October 9, 2003, the ADE Implementation Phase Working Group met to review the Implementation Phase activities for the previous quarter. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, updated the group on all relevant desegregation issues. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, discussed the Desegregation ruling on unitary status for LRSD. The next Implementation Phase Working Group Meeting is scheduled for January 8, 2004 at the ADE. On October 16, 2003, ADE staff met with the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee at the State Capitol. Mr. Willie Morris, ADE Lead Planner for Desegregation, and Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, presented the Chronology of activity by the ADE in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan for the Desegregation Settlement Agreement. They also discussed the role of the ADE Desegregation Monitoring Section. Mr. Mark Hagemeier, Assistant Attorney General, and Scott Smith, ADE Staff Attorney, reported on legal issues relating to the Pulaski County Desegregation Case. Ann Marshall shared a history of activities by ODM, and their view of the activity of the school districts in Pulaski County. John Kunkel discussed Desegregation funding by the ADE. 19 111. A PETITION FOR ELECTION FOR LRSD WILL BE SUPPORTED SHOULD A MILLAGE BE REQUIRED A. Monitor court pleadings to determine if LRSD has petitioned the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Ongoing. All Court pleadings are monitored monthly. B. Draft and file appropriate pleadings if LRSD petitions the Court for a special election. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 To date, no action has been taken by the LRSD. 20 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION A. Using a collaborative approach, immediately identify those laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date December, 1994 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. B. Conduct a review within ADE of existing legislation and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. C. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. Request of the other parties to the Settlement Agreement that they identify laws and regulations that appear to impede desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date November, 1994 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. D.  Submit proposals to the State Board of Education for repeal of those regulations that are confirmed to be impediments to desegregation. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section IV.E. of this report. 21 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 A committee within the ADE was formed in May 1995 to review and collect data on existing legislation and regulations identified by the parties as impediments to desegregation. The committee researched the Districts' concerns to determine if any of the rules, regulations, or legislation cited impede desegregation. The legislation cited by the Districts regarding loss funding and worker's compensation were not reviewed because they had already been litigated. In September 1995, the committee reviewed the following statutes, acts, and regulations: Act 113 of 1993\nADE Director's Communication 93-205\nAct 145 of 1989\nADE Director's Memo 91-67\nADE Program Standards Eligibility Criteria for Special Education\nArkansas Codes 6-18-206, 6-20-307, 6-20-319, and 6-17- 1506. In October 1995, the individual reports prepared by committee members in their areas of expertise and the data used to support their conclusions were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. A report was prepared and submitted to the State Board of Education in July 1996. The report concluded that none of the items reviewed impeded desegregation. As of February 3, 1997, no laws or regulations have been determined to impede desegregation efforts. Any new education laws enacted during the Arkansas 81 st Legislative Session will be reviewed at the close of the legislative session to ensure that they do not impede desegregation. In April 1997, copies of all laws passed during the 1997 Regular Session of the 81 st General Assembly were requested from the office of the ADE Liaison to the Legislature for _distribution to the Districts for their input and review of possible impediments to their desegregation efforts. In August 1997, a meeting to review the statutes passed in the prior legislative session was scheduled for September 9, 1997. 22 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On September 9, 1997, a meeting was held to discuss the review of the statutes passed in the prior legislative session and new ADE regulations. The Districts will be contacted in writing for their input regarding any new laws or regulations that they feel may impede desegregation. Additionally, the Districts will be asked to review their regulations to ensure that they do not impede their desegregation efforts. The committee will convene on December 1, 1997 to review their findings and finalize their report to the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. In October 1997, the Districts were asked to review new regulations and statutes for impediments to their desegregation efforts, and advise the ADE, in writing, if they feel a regulation or statute may impede their desegregation efforts. In October 1997, the Districts were requested to advise the ADE, in writing, no later than November 1, 1997 of any new law that might impede their desegregation efforts. As of November 12, 1997, no written responses were received from the Districts. The ADE concludes that the Districts do not feel that any new law negatively impacts their desegregation efforts. The committee met on December 1, 1997 to discuss their findings regarding statutes and regulations that may impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. The committee concluded that there were no laws or regulations that impede the desegregation efforts of the Districts. It was decided that the committee chair would prepare a report of the committee's findings for the Administrative Team and the State Board of Education. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation is now reviewing proposed bills and regulations, as well as laws that are being signed in, for the current 1999 legislative session. They will continue to do so until the session is over. The committee to review statutes and regulations that impede desegregation will meet on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The committee met on April 26, 1999 at the ADE. The purpose of the meeting was to identify rules and regulations that might impede desegregation, and review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. This is a standing committee that is ongoing and a report will be submitted to the State Board of Education once the process is completed. 23 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) The committee met on May 24, 1999 at the ADE. The committee was asked to review within the existing legislation any regulations that might result in an impediment to desegregation. The committee determined that Mr. Ray Lumpkin would contact the Pulaski County districts to request written response to any rules, regulations or laws that might impede desegregation. The committee would also collect information and data to prepare a report for the State Board. This will be a standing committee. This data gathering will be ongoing until the final report is given to the State Board. On July 26, 1999, the committee met at the ADE. The committee did not report any laws or regulations that they currently thought would impede desegregation, and are still waiting for a response from the three districts in Pulaski County. The committee met on August 30, 1999 at the ADE to review rules and regulations that might impede desegregation. At that time, there were no laws under review that appeared to impede desegregation. In November, the three districts sent letters to the ADE stating that they have reviewed the laws passed by the 82nd legislative session as well as current rules \u0026amp; regulations and district policies to ensure that they have no ill effect on desegregation efforts. There was some concern from PCSSD concerning a charter school proposal in the Maumelle area. The work of the committee is on-going each month depending on the information that comes before the committee. Any rules, laws or regulations that would impede desegregation will be discussed and reported to the State Board of Education. On October 4, 2000, the ADE presented staff development for assistant superintendents in LRSD, NLRSD and PCSSD regarding school laws of Arkansas. The ADE is in the process of forming a committee to review all Rules and Regulations from the ADE and State Laws that might impede desegregation. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will review all new laws that might impede desegregation once the 83rd General Assembly has completed this session. The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations will meet for the first time on June 11, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. in room 204-A at the ADE. The committee will review all new laws that might impede desegregation that were passed during the 2001 Legislative Session. 24 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued) E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) The ADE Committee on Statutes and Regulations rescheduled the meeting that was planned for June 11, in order to review new regulations proposed to the State Board of Education. The meeting will take place on July 16, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on July 16, 2001 at the ADE. The following Items were discussed: (1) Review of 2001 state laws which appear to impede desegregation. (2) Review of existing ADE regulations which appear to impede desegregation. (3) Report any laws or regulations found to impede desegregation to the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts. The next meeting will take place on August 27, 2001 at 9:00 a.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on August 27, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on September 10, 2001 in Conference Room 204-B at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on September 10, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. The next meeting will take place on October 24, 2001 in Conference Room 204-8 at 2:00 p.m. at the ADE. The ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation met on October 24, 2001 at the ADE. The Committee is reviewing all relevant laws or regulations produced by the Arkansas State Legislature, the ADE and the Pulaski County school districts in FY 2000/2001 to determine if they may impede desegregation. On December 17, 2001, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation composed letters that will be sent to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. Laws to review include those of the 83rd General Assembly, ADE regulations, and regulations of the Districts. 25 IV. REPEAL STATUTES AND REGULATIONS THAT IMPEDE DESEGREGATION (Continued} E. Submit proposals to the Legislature for repeal of those laws that appear to be impediments to desegregation. (Continued} 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On January 10, 2002, the ADE Committee to Repeal Statutes and Regulations that Impede Desegregation sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County. The letters ask for input regarding any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to respond by March 8, 2002. On March 5, 2002, A letter was sent from the LRSD which mentioned Act 1748 and Act 1667 passed during the 83rd Legislative Session which may impede desegregation. These laws will be researched to determine if changes need to be made. A letter was sent from the NLRSD on March 19, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation. On April 26, 2002, A letter was sent for the PCSSD to the ADE, noting that the district did not find any laws which impede desegregation except the \"deannexation\" legislation which the District opposed before the Senate committee. On October 27, 2003, the ADE sent letters to the school districts in Pulaski County asking if there were any new laws or regulations that may impede desegregation. The districts were asked to review laws passed during the 84th Legislative Session, any new ADE rules or regulations, and district policies. 26 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES A. Through a preamble to the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 The preamble was contained in the Implementation Plan filed with the Court on March 15, 1994. B. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement and outcomes of programs intended to apply those principles. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Ongoing C. Through execution of the Implementation Plan, the Board of Education will continue to reaffirm its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement by actions taken by ADE in response to monitoring results. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Ongoing D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 27 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 At each regular monthly meeting of the State Board of Education, the Board is provided copies of the most recent Project Management Tool (PMT) and an executive summary of the PMT for their review and approval. Only activities that are in addition to the Board's monthly review of the PMT are detailed below. In May 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the total number of schools visited during the monitoring phase and the data collection process. Suggestions were presented to the State Board of Education on how recommendations could be presented in the monitoring reports. In June 1995, an update on the status of the pending Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the State Board of Education. In July 1995, the July Semiannual Monitoring Report was reviewed by the State Board of Education. On August 14, 1995, the State Board of Education was informed of the need to increase minority participation in the teacher scholarship program and provided tentative monitoring dates to facilitate reporting requests by the ADE administrative team and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In September 1995, the State Board of Education was advised of a change in the PMT from a table format to a narrative format. The Board was also briefed about a meeting with the Office of Desegregation Monitoring regarding the PMT. In October 1995, the State Board of Education was updated on monitoring timelines. The Board was also informed of a meeting with the parties regarding a review of the Semiannual Monitoring Report and the monitoring process, and the progress of the test validation study. In November 1995, a report was made to the State Board of Education regarding the monitoring schedule and a meeting with the parties concerning the development of a common terminology for monitoring purposes. In December 1995, the State Board of Education was updated regarding announced monitoring visits. In January 1996, copies of the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report and its executive summary were provided to the State Board of Education. 28 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of AD E's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) During the months of February 1996 thmugh May 1996, the PMT report was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. In June 1996, the State Board of Education was updated on the status of the bias review study. In July 1996, the Semiannual Monitoring Report was provided to the Court, the parties, ODM, the State Board of Education, and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In August 1996, the State Board of Education and the ADE administrative team were provided with copies of the test validation study prepared by Dr. Paul Williams. During the months of September 1996 through December 1996, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. On January 13, 1997, a presentation was made to the State Board of Education regarding the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report, and copies of the report and its executive summary were distributed to all Board members. The Project Management Tool and its executive summary were addressed at the February 10, 1997 State Board of Education meeting regarding the ADE's progress in fulfilling their obligations as set forth in the Implementation Plan. In March 1997, the State Board of Education was notified that historical information in the PMT had been summarized at the direction of the Assistant Attorney General in order to reduce the size and increase the clarity of the report. The Board was updated on the Pulaski County Desegregation Case and reviewed the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued by the Court on February 18, 1997 in response to the Districts' motion for summary judgment on the issue of state funding for teacher retirement matching contributions. During the months of April 1997 through June 1997, the PMT was the only item on the agenda regarding the status of the implementation of the Monitoring Plan. The State Board of Education received copies of the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report and executive summary at the July Board meeting. 29 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued} The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on August 4, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. A special report regarding a historical review of the Pulaski County Settlement Agreement and the ADE's role and monitoring obligations were presented to the State Board of Education on September 8, 1997. Additionally, the July 15, 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Board for their review. In October 1997, a special draft report regarding disparity in achievement was submitted to the State Board Chairman and the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee. In November 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. The Implementation Phase Working Group held its quarterly meeting on November 3, 1997 to discuss the progress made in attaining the goals set forth in the Implementation Plan and the critical areas for the current quarter. In December 1997, the State Board of Education was provided copies of the monthly PMT and its executive summary. In January 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and discussed ODM's report on the ADE's monitoring activities and instructed the Director to meet with the parties to discuss revisions to the ADE's monitoring plan and monitoring reports. In February 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and discussed the February 1998 Semiannual Monitoring Report. In March 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary and was provided an update regarding proposed revisions to the monitoring process. In April 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. In May 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. 30 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) In June 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also reviewed how the ADE would report progress in the PMT concerning revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In July 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The State Board of Education also received an update on Test Validation, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Committee Meeting, and revisions in ADE's Monitoring Plan. In August 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the five discussion points regarding the proposed revisions to the monitoring and reporting process. The Board also reviewed the basic goal of the Minority Recruitment Committee. In September 1998, the State Board of Education reviewed the proposed modifications to the Monitoring plans by reviewing the common core of written response received from the districts. The primary commonalities were (1) Staff Development, (2) Achievement Disparity and (3) Disciplinary Disparity. A meeting of the parties is scheduled to be conducted on Thursday, September 17, 1998. The Board encouraged the Department to identify a deadline for Standardized Test Validation and Test Selection. In October 1998, the Board received the progress report on Proposed Revisions to the Desegregation Monitoring and Reporting Process (see XVIII). The Board also reviewed arid approved the PMT and its executive summary. In November, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the proposed revisions in the Desegregation monitoring Process and the update on Test validation and Test Selection provisions of the Settlement Agreement. The Board was also notified that the Implementation Plan Working Committee held its quarterly meeting to review progress and identify quarterly priorities. In December, the State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion by the ADE, the LRSD, NLRSD, and the PCSSD, to relieve the Department of its obligation to file a February Semiannual Monitoring Report. The Board was also notified that the Joshua lntervenors filed a motion opposing the joint motion. The Board was informed that the ADE was waiting on a response from Court. 31 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued} In January, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received an update on the joint motion of the ADE, LRSD, PCSSD, and NLRSD for an order relieving the ADE of filing a February 1999 Monitoring Report. The motion was granted subject to the following three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua intervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement. In February, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was informed that the three conditions: (1) notify the Joshua lntervenors of all meetings between the parties to discuss proposed changes, (2) file with the Court on or before February 1, 1999, a report detailing the progress made in developing proposed changes and (3) identify ways in which ADE might assist districts in their efforts to improve academic achievement had been satisfied. The Joshua lntervenors were invited again to attend the meeting of the parties and they attended on January 13, and January 28, 1999. They are also scheduled to attend on February 17, 1998. The report of progress, a collaborative effort from all parties was presented to court on February 1, 1999. The Board was also informed that additional items were received for inclusion in the revised report, after the deadline for the submission of the progress report and the ADE would: (1) check them for feasibility, and fiscal impact if any, and (2) include the items in future drafts of the report. In March, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also received and reviewed the Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Progress Report submitted to Court on February 1, 1999. On April 12, and May 10, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On June 14, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. 32 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30: 2004 (Continued) On July 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board also was notified that once the financial section of the proposed plan was completed, the revised plan would be submitted to the board for approval. On August 9, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On September 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was also notified that the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan would be ready to submit to the Board for their review \u0026amp; approval as soon as plans were finalized. On October 12, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed the PMT and its executive summary. The Board was notified that on September 21, 1999 that the Office of Education Lead Planning and Desegregation Monitoring meet before the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee and presented them with the draft version of the new Desegregation Monitoring and Assistance Plan. The State Board was notified that the plan would be submitted for Board review and approval when finalized. On November 8, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 13, 1999, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. 33 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On May 8, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 12, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 10, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 14, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 11, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 9, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 13, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 11, 2000, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 8, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 12, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 12, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 9, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 14, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 11, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. 34 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On July 9, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 13, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. On September 10, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 8, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 19, 2001, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 10, 2oo'1, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 11, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 11, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 13, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 10, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On July 8, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of June. On August 12, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of July. 35 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On September 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 14, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 18, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. On December 9, 2002, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of November. On January 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 14, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 12, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 9, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 11, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 8, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. On October 13, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of September. On November 10, 2003, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of October. 36 V. COMMITMENT TO PRINCIPLES (Continued) D. Through regular oversight of the Implementation Phase's Project Management Tool, and scrutiny of results of ADE's actions, the Board of Education will act on its commitment to the principles of the Settlement Agreement. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On January 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of December. On February 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of January. On March 8, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of February. On April 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of March. On May 10, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of April. On June 14, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of May. On August 9, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the months of June and July. On September 12, 2004, the Arkansas State Board of Education reviewed and approved the PMT and its executive summary for the month of August. 37 VI. REMEDIATION A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 During May 1995, team visits to Cycle 4 schools were conducted, and plans were developed for reviewing the Cycle 5 schools. In June 1995, the current Extended COE packet was reviewed, and enhancements to the Extended COE packet were prepared. In July 1995, year end reports were finalized by the Pulaski County field seNice specialists, and plans were finalized for reviewing the draft improvement plans of the Cycle 5 schools. In August 1995, Phase I - Cycle 5 school improvement plans were reviewed. Plans were developed for meeting with the Districts to discuss plans for Phase II - Cycle 1 schools of Extended COE, and a school improvement conference was conducted in Hot Springs. The technical review visits for the FY 95/96 year and the documentation process were also discussed. In October 1995, two computer programs, the Effective Schools Planner and the Effective Schools Research Assistant, were ordered for review, and the first draft of a monitoring checklist for Extended COE was developed. Through the Extended COE process, the field seNice representatives provided technical assistance based on the needs identified within the Districts from the data gathered. In November 1995, ADE personnel discussed and planned for the FY 95/96 monitoring, and onsite visits were conducted to prepare schools for the FY 95/96 team visits. Technical review visits continued in the Districts. In December 1995, announced monitoring and technical assistance visits were conducted in the Districts. At December 31, 1995, approximately 59% of the schools in the Districts had been monitored. Technical review visits were conducted during January 1996. In February 1996, announced monitoring visits and midyear monitoring reports were completed, and the field seNice specialists prepared for the spring NCA/COE peer team visits. 38 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued} In March 1996, unannounced monitoring visits of Cycle 5 schools commenced, and two-day peer team visits of Cycle 5 schools were conducted. Two-day team visit materials, team lists and reports were prepared. Technical assistance was provided to schools in final preparation for team visits and to schools needing any school improvement information. In April and May 1996, the unannounced monitoring visits were completed. The unannounced monitoring forms were reviewed and included in the July monitoring report. The two-day peer team visits were completed, and annual COE monitoring reports were prepared. In June 1996, all announced and unannounced monitoring visits of the Cycle 5 schools were completed, and the data was analyzed. The Districts identified enrollment in compensatory education programs. The Semiannual Monitoring Report was completed and filed with the Court on July 15, 1996, and copies were distributed to the parties. During August 1996, meetings were held with the Districts to discuss the monitoring requirements. Technical assistance meetings with Cycle 1 schools were planned for 96/97. The Districts were requested to record discipline data in accordance with the Allen Letter. In September 1996, recommendations regarding the ADE monitoring schedule for Cycle 1 schools and content layouts of the semiannual report were submitted to the ADE administrative team for their review. Training materials were developed and schedules outlined for Cycle 1 schools. In October 1996, technical assistance needs were identified and addressed to prepare each school for their team visits. Announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools began on October 28, 1996. In December 1996, the announced monitoring visits of the Cycle 1 schools were completed, and technical assistance needs were identified from school site visits. In January 1997, the ECOE monitoring section identified technical assistance needs of the Cycle 1 schools, and the data was reviewed when the draft February Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, the State Board of Education, and the parties. 39 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued} A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) In February 1997, field service specialists prepared for the peer team visits of the Cycle 1 schools. NCA accreditation reports were presented to the NCA Committee, and NCA reports were prepared for presentation at the April NCA meeting in Chicago. From March to May 1997, 111 visits were made to schools or central offices to work with principals, ECOE steering committees, and designated district personnel concerning school improvement planning. A workshop was conducted on Learning Styles for Geyer Springs Elementary School. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 15-17, 1997. The conference included information on the process of continuous school improvement, results of the first five years of COE, connecting the mission with the school improvement plan, and improving academic performance. Technical assistance needs were evaluated for the FY 97/98 school year in August 1997. From October 1997 to February 1998, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives. Technical assistance was provided to the Districts through meetings with the ECOE steering committees, assistance in analyzing perceptual surveys, and by providing samples of school improvement plans, Gold File catalogs, and web site addresses to schools visited. Additional technical assistance was provided to the Districts through discussions with the ECOE committees and chairs about the process. In November 1997, technical reviews of the ECOE process were conducted by the field service representatives in conjunction with the announced monitoring visits. Workshops on brainstorming and consensus building and asking strategic questions were held in January and February 1998. In March 1998, the field service representatives conducted ECOE team visits and prepared materials for the NCA workshop. Technical assistance was provided in workshops on the ECOE process and team visits. In April 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process and academically distressed schools. In May 1998, technical assistance was provided on the ECOE process, and team visits were conducted. 40 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) A. Through the Extended COE process, the needs for technical assistance by District, by School, and by desegregation compensatory education programs will be identified. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) In June 1998, the Extended COE Team Visit Reports were completed. A School Improvement Conference was held in Hot Springs on July 13-15, 1998. Major conference topics included information on the process of continuous school improvement, curriculum alignment, \"Smart Start,\" Distance Learning, using data to improve academic performance, educational technology, and multicultural education. All school districts in Arkansas were invited and representatives from Pulaski County attended. In September 1998, requests for technical assistance were received, visitation schedules were established, and assistance teams began visiting the Districts. Assistance was provided by telephone and on-site visits. The ADE provided inservice training on \"Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement\" at Gibbs Magnet Elementary school on October 5, 1998 at their request. The staff was taught how to increase test scores through data disaggregation, analysis, alignment, longitudinal achievement review, and use of individualized test data by student, teacher, class and content area. Information was also provided regarding the \"Smart Start\" and the \"Academic Distress\" initiatives. On October 20, 1998, ECOE technical assistance was provided to Southwest Jr. High School. B. Identify available resources for providing technical assistance for the specific condition, or circumstances of need, considering resources within ADE and the Districts, and also resources available from outside sources and experts. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. C. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 41 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) C. Through the ERIC system, conduct a literature search for research evaluating compensatory education programs. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 An updated ERIC Search was conducted on May 15, 1995 to locate research on evaluating compensatory education programs. The ADE received the updated ERIC disc that covered material through March 1995. An ERIC search was conducted in September 30, 1996 to identify current research dealing with the evaluation of compensatory education programs, and the articles were reviewed. An ERIC search was conducted in April 1997 to identify current research on compensatory education programs and sent to the Cycle 1 principals and the field service specialists for their use. An Eric search was conducted in October 1998 on the topic of Compensatory Education and related descriptors. The search included articles with publication dates from 1997 through July 1998. D. Identify and research technical resources available to ADE and the Districts through programs and organizations such as the Desegregation Assistance Center in San Antonio, Texas. 1. Projected Ending Date Summer 1994 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. E. Solicit, obtain, and use available resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 The information for this item is detailed under Section VI.F. of this report. 42 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 From March 1995 through July 1995, technical assistance and resources were obtained from the following sources: the Southwest Regional Cooperative\nUALR regarding training for monitors\nODM on a project management software\nADHE regarding data review and display\nand Phi Delta Kappa, the Desegregation Assistance Center and the Dawson Cooperative regarding perceptual surveys. Technical assistance was received on the Microsoft Project software in November 1995, and a draft of the PMT report using the new software package was presented to the ADE administrative team for review. In December 1995, a data manager was hired permanently to provide technical assistance with computer software and hardware. In October 1996, the field service specialists conducted workshops in the Districts to address their technical assistance needs and provided assistance for upcoming team visits. In November and December 1996, the field service specialists addressed technical assistance needs of the schools in the Districts as they were identified and continued to provide technical assistance for the upcoming team visits. In January 1997, a draft of the February 1997 Semiannual Monitoring Report was presented to the State Board of Education, the Desegregation Litigation Oversight Subcommittee, and the parties. The ECOE monitoring section of the report included information that identified technical assistance needs and resources available to the Cycle 1 schools. Technical assistance was provided during the January 29-31, 1997 Title I MidWinter Conference. The conference emphasized creating a learning community by building capacity schools to better serve all children and empowering parents to acquire additional skills and knowledge to better support the education of their children. In February 1997, three ADE employees attended the Southeast Regional Conference on Educating Black Children. Participants received training from national experts who outlined specific steps that promote and improve the education of black children. 43 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On March 6-9, 1997, three members of the ADE's Technical Assistance Section attended the National Committee for School Desegregation Conference. The participants received training in strategies for Excellence and Equity: Empowerment and Training for the Future. Specific information was received regarding the current status of court-ordered desegregation, unitary status, and resegregation and distributed to the Districts and ADE personnel. The field service specialists attended workshops in March on ACT testing and school improvement to identify technical assistance resources available to the Districts and the ADE that will facilitate desegregation efforts. ADE personnel attended the Eighth Annual Conference on Middle Level Education in Arkansas presented by the Arkansas Association of Middle Level Education on April 6-8, 1997. The theme of the conference was Sailing Toward New Horizons. In May 1997, the field service specialists attended the NCA annual conference and an inservice session with Mutiu Fagbayi. An Implementation Oversight Committee member participated in the Consolidated COE Plan inservice training. In June and July 1997, field service staff attended an SAT-9 testing workshop and participated in the three-day School Improvement Conference held in Hot Springs. The conference provided the Districts with information on the COE school improvement process, technical assistance on monitoring and assessing achievement, availability of technology for the classroom teacher, and teaching strategies for successful student achievement. In August 1997, field service personnel attended the ASCD Statewide Conference and the AAEA Administrators Conference. On August 18, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held and presentations were made on the Early Literacy Learning in Arkansas (ELLA) program and the Schools of the 21st Century program. In September 1997, technical assistance was provided to the Cycle 2 principals on data collection for onsite and offsite monitoring. ADE personnel attended the Region VI Desegregation Conference in October 1997. Current desegregation and educational equity cases and unitary status issues were the primary focus of the conference. On October 14, 1997, the bi-monthly Team V meeting was held in Paragould to enable members to observe a 21st Century school and a school that incorporates traditional and multi-age classes in its curriculum. 44 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) In November 1997, the field service representatives attended the Governor's Partnership Workshop to discuss how to tie the committee's activities with the ECOE process. In March 1998, the field service representatives attended a school improvement conference and conducted workshops on team building and ECOE team visits. Staff development seminars on Using Data to Sharpen the Focus on Student Achievement are scheduled for March 23, 1998 and March 27, 1998 for the Districts. In April 1998, the Districts participated in an ADE seminar to aid them in evaluating and improving student achievement. In August 1998, the Field Service Staff attended inservice to provide further assistance to schools, i.e., Title I Summer Planning Session, ADE session on Smart Start, and the School Improvement Workshops. All schools and districts in Pulaski County were invited to attend the \"Smart Start\" Summit November 9, 10, and 11 to learn more about strategies to increase student performance. \"Smart Start\" is a .standards-driven educational initiative which emphasizes the articulation of clear standards for student achievement and accurate measures of progress against those standards through assessments, staff development and individual school accountability. The Smart Start Initiative focused on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. Representatives from all three districts attended. On January 21, 1998, the ADE provided staff development for the staff at Oak Grove Elementary School designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement. Using achievement data from Oak Grove, educators reviewed trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. On February 24, 1999, the ADE provided staff development for the administrative staff at Clinton Elementary School regarding analysis of achievement data. On February 15, 1999, staff development was rescheduled for Lawson Elementary School. The staff development program was designed to assist them with their efforts to improve student achievement using achievement data from Lawson, educators reviewed the components of the Arkansas Smart Initiative, trends in achievement data, identified areas of greatest need, and reviewed seven steps for improving student performance. Student Achievement Workshops were rescheduled for Southwest Jr. High in the Little Rock School District, and the Oak Grove Elementary School in the Pulaski County School District. 45 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On April 30, 1999, a Student Achievement Workshop was conducted for Oak Grove Elementary School in PCSSD. The Student Achievement Workshop for Southwest Jr. High in LRSD has been rescheduled. On June 8, 1999, a workshop was presented to representatives from each of the Arkansas Education Service Cooperatives and representatives from each of the three districts in Pulaski County. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACTAAP). On June 18, 1999, a workshop was presented to administrators of the NLRSD. The workshop detailed the Arkansas Comprehensive Testing, Assessment and Accountability Program (ACTAAP). On August 16, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACT AAP program was presented during the preschool staff development activities for teaching assistant in the LRSD. On August 20, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACTAAP program was presented during the preschool staff development activities for the Accelerated Learning Center in the LRSD. On September 13, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement and the components of the new ACT AAP program were presented to the staff at Booker T. Washington Magnet Elementary School. On September 27, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was presented to the Middle and High School staffs of the NLRSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On October 26, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was presented to LRSD personnel through a staff development training class. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On December 7, 1999, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was scheduled for Southwest Middle School in the LRSD. The workshop was also set to cover the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. However, Southwest Middle School administrators had a need to reschedule, therefore the workshop will be rescheduled. 46 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On January 10, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for both Dr. Martin Luther King Magnet Elementary School \u0026amp; Little Rock Central High School. The workshops also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On March 1, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for all principals and district level administrators in the PCSSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACTAAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. On April 12, 2000, professional development on ways to increase student achievement was conducted for the LRSD. The workshop also covered the components of the new ACT AAP program, and ACT 999 of 1999. Targeted staffs from the middle and junior high schools in the three districts in Pulaski County attended the Smart Step Summit on May 1 and May 2. Training was provided regarding the overview of the \"Smart Step\" initiative, \"Standard and Accountability in Action,\" and \"Creating Learning Environments Through Leadership Teams.\" The ADE provided training on the development of alternative assessment September 12-13, 2000. Information was provided regarding the assessment of Special Education and LEP students. Representatives from each district were provided the opportunity to select a team of educators from each school within the district to participate in professional development regarding Integrating Curriculum and Assessment K-12. The professional development activity was directed by the national consultant, Dr. Heidi Hays Jacobs, on September 14 and 15, 2000. The ADE provided professional development workshops from October 2 through October 13, 2000 regarding, \"The Write Stuff: Curriculum Frameworks, Content Standards and Item Development.\" Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation provided the training. Representatives from each district were provided the opportunity to select a team of educators from each school within the district to participate. The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems by video conference for Special Education and LEP Teachers on November 17, 2000. Also, Alternative Assessment Portfolio System Training was provided for testing coordinators through teleconference broadcast on November 27, 2000. 47 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On December 12, 2000, the ADE provided training for Test Coordinators on end of course assessments in Geometry and Algebra I Pilot examination. Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation conducted the professional development at the Arkansas Teacher Retirement Building. The ADE presented a one-day training session with Dr. Cecil Reynolds on the Behavior Assessment for Children (BASC). This took place on December 7, 2000 at the NLRSD Administrative Annex. Dr. Reynolds is a practicing clinical psychologist. He is also a professor at Texas A \u0026amp; M University and a nationally known author. In the training, Dr. Reynolds addressed the following: 1) how to use and interpret information obtained on the direct observation form, 2) how to use this information for programming, 3) when to use the BASC, 4) when to refer for more or additional testing or evaluation, 5) who should complete the forms and when, (i.e., parents, teachers, students), 6) how to correctly interpret scores. This training was intended to especially benefit School Psychology Specialists, psychologists, psychological examiners, educational examiners and counselors. During January 22-26, 2001 the ADE presented the ACT AAP Intermediate (Grade 6) Benchmark Professional Development Workshop on Item Writing. Experts from the Data Recognition Corporation provided the training. Representatives from each district were invited to attend. On January 12, 2001 the ADE presented test administrators training for mid-year End of Course (Pilot) Algebra I and Geometry exams. This was provided for schools with block scheduling. On January 13, 2001 the ADE presented SmartScience Lessons and worked with teachers to produce curriculum. This was shared with eight Master Teachers. The SmartScience Lessons were developed by the Arkansas Science Teachers Association in conjunction with the Wilbur Mills Educational Cooperative under an Eisenhower grant provided by the ADE. The purpose of SmartScience is to provide K-6 teachers with activity-oriented science lessons that incorporate reading, writing, and mathematics skills. The following training has been provided for educators in the three districts in Pulaski County by the Division of Special Education at the ADE since January 2000: On January 6, 2000, training was conducted for the Shannon Hills Pre-school Program, entitled \"Things you can do at home to support your child's learning.\" This was presented by Don Boyd - ASERC and Shelley Weir. The school's director and seven parents attended. 48 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On March 8, 2000, training was conducted for the Southwest Middle School in Little Rock, on ADD. Six people attended the training. There was follow-up training on Learning and Reading Styles on March 26. This was presented by Don Boyd - ASERC and Shelley Weir. On September 7, 2000, Autism and Classroom Accommodations for the LRSD at Chicot Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Karen Sabo, Kindergarten Teacher\nMelissa Gleason, Paraprofessional\nCurtis Mayfield, P.E. Teacher\nLisa Poteet, Speech Language Pathologist\nJane Harkey, Principal\nKathy Penn-Norman, Special Education Coordinator\nAlice Phillips, Occupational Therapist. On September 15, 2000, the Governor's Developmental Disability Coalition Conference presented Assistive Technology Devices \u0026amp; Services. This was held at the Arlington Hotel in Hot Springs. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On September 19, 2000, Autism and Classroom Accommodations for the LRSD at Jefferson Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Melissa Chaney, Special Education Teacher\nBarbara Barnes, Special Education Coordinator\na Principal, a Counselor, a Librarian, and a Paraprofessional. On October 6, 2000, Integrating Assistive Technology Into Curriculum was presented at a conference in the Hot Springs Convention Center. Presenters were: Bryan Ayers and Aleecia Starkey. Speech Language Pathologists from LRSD and NLRSD attended. On October 24, 2000, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On October 25 and 26, 2000, Alternate Assessment for Students with Severe Disabilities for the LRSD at J. A. Fair High School was presented. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. The participants were: Susan Chapman, Special Education Coordinator\nMary Steele, Special Education Teacher\nDenise Nesbit, Speech Language Pathologist\nand three Paraprofessionals. On November 14, 2000, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. On November 17, 2000, training was conducted on Autism for the LRSD at the Instructional Resource Center. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. 49 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On December 5, 2000, Access to the Curriculum Via the use of Assistive Technology Computer Lab was presented. Bryan Ayres was the presenter of this teleconference. The participants were: Tim Fisk, Speech Language Pathologist from Arch Ford Education Service Cooperative at Plumerville and Patsy Lewis, Special Education Teacher from Mabelvale Middle School in the LRSD. On January 9, 2001, Consideration and Assessment of Assistive Technology was presented through Compressed Video-Teleconference at the ADE facility in West Little Rock. Bryan Ayres was the presenter. Kathy Brown, a vision consultant from the LRSD, was a participant. On January 23, 2001, Autism and Classroom Modifications for the LRSD at Brady Elementary School was presented. Bryan Ayres and Shelley Weir were presenters. The participants were: Beverly Cook, Special Education Teacher\nAmy Littrell, Speech Language Pathologist\nJan Feurig, Occupational Therapist\nCarolyn James, Paraprofessional\nCindy Kackly, Paraprofessional\nand Rita Deloney, Paraprofessional. The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems for Special Education and Limited English Proficient students through teleconference broadcast on February 5, 2001. Presenters were: Charlotte Marvel, ADE\nDr. Gayle Potter, ADE\nMarcia Harding, ADE\nLynn Springfield, ASERC\nMary Steele, J. A. Fair High School, LRSD\nBryan Ayres, Easter Seals Outreach. This was provided for Special Education teachers and supervisors in the morning, and Limited English Proficient teachers and supervisors in the afternoon. The Special Education session was attended by 29 teachers/administrators and provided answers to specific questions about the alternate assessment portfolio system and the scoring rubric and points on the rubric to be used to score the portfolios. The LEP session was attended by 16 teachers/administrators and disseminated the common tasks to be included in the portfolios: one each in mathematics, writing and reading. On February 12-23, 2001, the ADE and Data Recognition Corporation personnel trained Test Coordinators in the administration of the spring Criterion-Referenced Test. This was provided in 20 sessions at 10 regional sites. Testing protocol, released items, and other testing materials were presented and discussed. The sessions provided training for Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy, Algebra and Geometry Pilot Tests. The LRSD had 2 in attendance for the End of Course session and 2 for the Benchmark session. The NLRSD had 1 in attendance for the End of Course session and 1 for the Benchmark session. The PCSSD had 1 in attendance for the End of Course session and 1 for the Benchmark session. 50 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On March 15, 2001, there was a meeting at the ADE to plan professional development for staff who work with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) students. A $30,000 grant has been created to provide LEP training at Chicot Elementary for a year, starting in April 2001. A $40,000 grant was created to provide a Summer English as Second Language (ESL) Academy for the LRSD from June 18 through 29, 2001. Andre Guerrero from the ADE Accountability section met with Karen Broadnax, ESL Coordinator at LRSD, Pat Price, Early Childhood Curriculum Supervisor at LRSD, and Jane Harkey, Principal of Chicot Elementary. On March 1-2 and 8-29, 2001, ADE staff performed the following activities: processed registration for April 2 and 3 Alternate Portfolio Assessment video conference quarterly meeting\nanswered questions about Individualized Educational Plan (IEP) and LEP Alternate Portfolio Assessment by phone from schools and Education Service Cooperatives\nand signed up students for alternate portfolio assessment from school districts. On March 6, 2001, ADE staff attended a Smart Step Technology Leadership Conference at the State House Convention Center. On March 7, 2001, ADE staff attended a National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Regional Math Framework Meeting about the Consensus Project 2004. On March 8, 2001, there was a one-on-one conference with Carole Villarreal from Pulaski County at the ADE about the LEP students with portfolios. She was given pertinent data, including all the materials that have been given out at the video conferences. The conference lasted for at least an hour. On March 14, 2001, a Test Administrator's Training Session was presented specifically to LRSD Test Coordinators and Principals. About 60 LRSD personnel attended. The following meetings have been conducted with educators in the three districts in Pulaski County since July 2000. On July 10-13, 2000 the ADE provided Smart Step training. The sessions covered Standards-based classroom practices. 51 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On July 19-21, 2000 the ADE held the Math/Science Leadership Conference at UCA. This provided services for Arkansas math and science teachers to support systemic reform in math/science and training for 8th grade Benchmark. There were 200 teachers from across the state in attendance. On August 14-31, 2000 the ADE presented Science Smart Start Lessons and worked with teachers to produce curriculum. This will provide K-6 teachers with activity-oriented science lessons that incorporate reading, writing, and mathematics skills. On September 5, 2000 the ADE held an Eisenhower Informational meeting with Teacher Center Coordinators. The purpose of the Eisenhower Professional Development Program is to prepare teachers, school staff, and administrators to help all students meet challenging standards in the core academic subjects. A summary of the program was presented at the meeting. On November 2-3, 2000 the ADE held the Arkansas Conference on Teaching. This presented curriculum and activity workshops. More than 1200 attended the conference. On November 6, 2000 there was a review of Science Benchmarks and sample model curriculum. A committee of 6 reviewed and revised a drafted document. The committee was made up of ADE and K-8 teachers. On November 7-10, 2000 the ADE held a meeting of the Benchmark and End of Course Mathematics Content Area Committee. Classroom teachers reviewed items for grades 4, 6, 8 and EOC mathematics assessment. There were 60 participants. On December 4-8, 2000 the ADE conducted grades 4 and 8 Benchmark Scoring for Writing Assessment. This professional development was attended by approximately 750 teachers. On December 8, 2000 the ADE conducted Rubric development for Special Education Portfolio scoring. This was a meeting with special education supervisors to revise rubric and plan for scoring in June. On December 8, 2000 the ADE presented the Transition Mathematics Pilot Training Workshop. This provided follow-up training and activities for fourth-year mathematics professional development. On December 12, 2000 the ADE presented test administrators training for midyear End of Course (Pilot) Algebra I and Geometry exams. This was provided for schools with block scheduling. 52 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) The ADE provided training on Alternative Assessment Portfolio Systems for Special Education and Limited English Proficient students through teleconference broadcasts on April 2-3, 2001. Administration of the Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy took place on April 23-27, 2001. Administration of the End of Course Algebra and Geometry Exams took place on May 2-3, 2001. Over 1,100 Arkansas educators attended the Smart Step Growing Smarter Conference on July 10 and 11, 2001, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center. Smart Step focuses on improving student achievement for Grades 5-8. The Smart Step effort seeks to provide intense professional development for teachers and administrators at the middle school level, as well as additional materials and assistance to the state's middle school teachers. The event began with opening remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. Carl Boyd, a longtime educator and staff consultant for Learning 24-7, presented the first keynote address on \"The Character-Centered Teacher''. Debra Pickering, an education consultant from Denver, Colorado, presented the second keynote address on \"Characteristics of Middle Level Education\". Throughout the Smart Step conference, educators attended breakout sessions that were grade-specific and curriculum area-specific. Pat Davenport, an education consultant from Houston, Texas, delivered two addresses. She spoke on \"A Blueprint for Raising Student Achievement\". Representatives from all three districts in Pulaski County attended. Over 1,200 Arkansas teachers and administrators attended the Smart Start Conference on July 12, 2001, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center. Smart Start is a standards-driven educational initiative which emphasizes the articulation of clear standards for student achievement and accurate measures of progress against those standards through assessments, staff development and individual school accountability. The Smart Start Initiative focused on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. The event began with opening remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. Carl Boyd, a longtime educator and staff consultant for Learning 24-7, presented the keynote address. The day featured a series of 15 breakout sessions on best classroom practices. Representatives from all three districts in Pulaski County attended. On July 18-20, 2001, the ADE held the Math/Science Leadership Conference at UCA. This provided services for Arkansas math and science teachers to support systemic reform in math/science and training for 8th grade Benchmark. There were approximately 300 teachers from across the state in attendance. 53 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) The ADE and Harcourt Educational Measurement conducted Stanford 9 test administrator training from August 1-9, 2001. The training was held at Little Rock, Jonesboro, Fort Smith, Forrest City, Springdale, Mountain Home, Prescott, and Monticello. Another session was held at the ADE on August 30, for those who were unable to attend August 1-9. The ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by video conference at the Education SeNice Cooperatives and at the ADE from 9:00 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on September 5, 2001. The ADE released the performance of all schools on the Primary and Middle Level Benchmark Exams on September 5, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Core Teacher ln-SeNice training for Central in the LRSD on September 6, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Checklist training for Hall in the LRSD on September 7, 2001. The ADE conducted Transition Checklist training for McClellan in the LRSD on September 13, 2001. The ADE conducted Basic Co-teaching training for the LRSD on October 9, 2001. The ADE conducted training on autism spectrum disorder for the PCSSD on October 15, 2001. Professional Development workshops (1 day in length) in scoring End of Course assessments in algebra, geometry and reading were provided for all districts in the state. Each school was invited to send three representatives (one for each of the sessions). LRSD, NLRSD, and PCSSD participated. Information and training materials pertaining to the Alternate Portfolio Assessment were provided to all districts in the state and were supplied as requested to LRSD, PCSSD and David 0. Dodd Elementary. On November 1-2, 2001 the ADE held the Arkansas Conference on Teaching at the Excelsior Hotel \u0026amp; Statehouse Convention Center. This presented sessions, workshops and short courses to promote exceptional teaching and learning. Educators could become involved in integrated math, science, English \u0026amp; language arts and social studies learning. The ADE received from the schools selected to participate in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), a list of students who will take the test. 54 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On December 3-7, 2001 the ADE conducted grade 6 Benchmark scoring training for reading and math. Each school district was invited to send a math and a reading specialist. The training was held at the Holiday Inn Airport in Little Rock. On December 4 and 6, 2001 the ADE conducted Mid-Year Test Administrator Training for Algebra and Geometry. This was held at the Arkansas Activities Association's conference room in North Little Rock. On January 24, 2002, the ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by ADE compressed video with Fred Jones presenting. On January 31, 2002, the ADE conducted the Smart Step quarterly meeting by NSCI satellite with Fred Jones presenting. On February 7, 2002, the ADE Smart Step co-sponsored the AR Association of Middle Level Principal's/ADE curriculum, assessment and instruction workshop with Bena Kallick presenting. On February 11-21, 2002, the ADE provided training for Test Administrators on the Primary, Intermediate, and Middle Level Benchmark Exams as well as End of Course Literacy, Algebra and Geometry Exams. The sessions took place at Forrest City, Jonesboro, Mountain Home, Springdale, Fort Smith, Monticello, Prescott, Arkadelphia and Little Rock. A make-up training broadcast was given at 15 Educational Cooperative Video sites on February 22. During February 2002, the LRSD had two attendees for the Benchmark Exam training and one attendee for the End of Course Exam training. The NLRSD and PCSSD each had one attendee at the Benchmark Exam training and one attendee for the End of Course Exam training. The ADE conducted the Smart Start quarterly meeting by compressed interactive video at the South Central Education Service Cooperative from 9:30 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on May 2, 2002. Telecast topics included creating a standards-based classroom and a seven-step implementation plan. The principal's role in the process was explained. The ADE conducted the Smart Step quarterly meeting by compressed interactive video at the South Central Education Service Cooperative from 9:30 a.m. until 11 :30 a.m. on May 9, 2002. Telecast topics included creating a standards-based classroom and a seven-step implementation plan. The principal's role in the process was explained. 55 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) The Twenty-First Annual Curriculum and Instruction Conference, co-sponsored by the Arkansas Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development and the Arkansas Department of Education, will be held June 24-26, 2002, at the Arlington Hotel in Hot Springs, Arkansas. \"Ignite Your Enthusiasm for Learning\" is the theme for this year's conference, which will feature educational consultant, Dr. Debbie Silver, as well as other very knowledgeable presenters. Additionally, there will be small group sessions on Curriculum Alignment, North Central Accreditation, Section 504, Building Level Assessment, Administrator Standards, Data Disaggregation, and National Board. The Educational Accountability Unit of the ADE hosted a workshop entitled \"Strategies for Increasing Achievement on the ACTAAP Benchmark Examination\" on June 13-14, 2002 at the Agora Center in Conway. The workshop was presented for schools in which 100% of students scored below the proficient level on one or more parts of the most recent Benchmark Examination. The agenda included presentations on ''The Plan-Do-Check-Act Instructional Cycle\" by the nationally known speaker Pat Davenport. ADE personnel provided an explanation of the MPH point program. Presentations were made by Math and Literacy Specialists. Dr. Charity Smith, Assistant Director for Accountability, gave a presentation about ACTAAP. Break out sessions were held, in which school districts with high scores on the MPH point program offered strategies and insights into increasing student achievement. The NLRSD, LRSD, and PCSSD were invited to attend. The NLRSD attended the workshop. The Smart Start Summer Conference took place on July 8-9, 2002, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center and Peabody Hotel. The Smart Start Initiative focuses on improving reading and mathematics achievement for all students in Grades K-4. The event included remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. After comments by the Director, Bena Kallick presented the keynote address \"Beyond Mapping: Essential Questions, Assessment, Higher Order Thinking\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. On the second day, Vivian Moore gave the keynote address \"Overcoming Obstacles: Avenues for Student Success\". Krista Underwood gave the presentation \"Put Reading First in Arkansas\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. 56 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) The Smart Step Summer Conference took place on July 10-11, 2002, at the Little Rock Statehouse Convention Center and Peabody Hotel. Smart Step focuses on improving student achievement for Grades 5-8. The event included remarks by Ray Simon, Director of the ADE. After comments by the Director, Vivian Moore presented the keynote address \"Overcoming Obstacles: Avenues for Student Success\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. On the second day, Bena Kallick presented \"Beyond Mapping: Essential Questions, Assessment, Higher Order Thinking\". Ken Stamatis presented \"Smart Steps to Creating a School Culture That Supports Adolescent Comprehension\". This was followed by a series of breakout sessions on best classroom practices. On August 8, 2002, Steven Weber held a workshop at Booker T. Washington Elementary on \"Best Practices in Social Studies\". It was presented to the 4th grade teachers in the Little Rock School District. The workshop focused around the five themes of geography and the social studies (fourth grade) framework/standards. Several Internet web sites were shared with the teachers, and the teachers were shown methods for incorporating writing into fourth grade social studies. One of the topics was using primary source photos and technology to stimulate the students to write about diverse regions. A theme of the workshop included identifying web sites which apply to fourth grade social studies teachers and interactive web sites for fourth grade students. This was a Back-to-School In-service workshop. The teachers were actively involved in the workshop. On August 13 Steven Weber conducted a workshop at Parkview High School in the LRSD. Topics of the workshop included: 1. Incorporating Writing in the Social Studies Classroom 2. Document Based (open-ended) Questioning Techniques 3. How to practice writing on a weekly basis without assigning a lengthy research report 4. Developing Higher Level Thinking Skills in order to produce active citizens, rather than passive, uninformed citizens 5. Using the Social Studies F\namework 6. Identifying state and national Web Sites which contain Primary Sources for use in the classroom The 8:30 - 11 :30 session was for the 6 - 8 grade social studies teachers. The 12:30 - 3:00 session was for the 9 - 12 grade social studies teachers. Several handouts were used, also PowerPoint, primary source photos and documents, and Internet web sites (i.e., Library of Congress, Butler Center for Arkansas Studies, National Archives, etc.). This was a Back-to-School In-service workshop. The teachers were actively involved in the workshop. Marie McNeal is the Social Studies Specialist for the Little Rock School District. She invited Steven Weber to present at the workshop, and was in attendance. 57 VI. REMEDIATION (Continued) F. Evaluate the impact of the use of resources for technical assistance. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 (Continued) On September 30 through October 11, 2002, the ADE provided Professional Development for Test Administrators on the End of Course Literacy, Algebra and Geometry Exams. The training was held at the Holiday Inn Airport. All three districts in Pulaski County sent representatives to the training. On October 3, 2002, Charlotte Marvel provided in-service training for LEP teachers in the Little Rock School District. On December 6, 2002,\nThis project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resoources.\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_creator\u003eArkansas. Department of Education\u003c/dcterms_creator\u003e\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n  \n\n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n\n\n  \n\n\n\n "},{"id":"bcas_bcmss0837_1774","title":"Court filings regarding Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tools, Office of Desegregation Management (ODM) report, and plaintiff's notice of filing quarterly update to ODM.","collection_id":"bcas_bcmss0837","collection_title":"Office of Desegregation Management","dcterms_contributor":null,"dcterms_spatial":["United States, 39.76, -98.5","United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959"],"dcterms_creator":["United States. District Court (Arkansas: Eastern District)"],"dc_date":["2004-09/2004-12"],"dcterms_description":null,"dc_format":["application/pdf"],"dcterms_identifier":null,"dcterms_language":["eng"],"dcterms_publisher":["Little Rock, Ark. : Butler Center for Arkansas Studies. Central Arkansas Library System"],"dc_relation":null,"dc_right":["http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/"],"dcterms_is_part_of":["Office of Desegregation Monitoring records (BC.MSS.08.37)","History of Segregation and Integration of Arkansas's Educational System"],"dcterms_subject":["Education--Arkansas","Little Rock (Ark.)--History--21st century","Arkansas. Department of Education","Office of Desegregation Monitoring (Little Rock, Ark.)","School districts","Little Rock School District","Project management","Education--Finance","Magnet schools","School integration"],"dcterms_title":["Court filings regarding Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tools, Office of Desegregation Management (ODM) report, and plaintiff's notice of filing quarterly update to ODM."],"dcterms_type":["Text"],"dcterms_provenance":["Butler Center for Arkansas Studies"],"edm_is_shown_by":null,"edm_is_shown_at":["http://arstudies.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/bcmss0837/id/1774"],"dcterms_temporal":null,"dcterms_rights_holder":null,"dcterms_bibliographic_citation":null,"dlg_local_right":["Available for use in research, teaching, and private study. Any other use requires permission from the Butler Center."],"dcterms_medium":["judicial records"],"dcterms_extent":["43 page scan, typed"],"dlg_subject_personal":null,"dcterms_subject_fast":null,"fulltext":"\u003c?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"utf-8\"?\u003e\n\u003citems type=\"array\"\u003e  \u003citem\u003e   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n \n\n\u003cdcterms_description type=\"array\"\u003e   \n\n\u003cdcterms_description\u003eCourt filings: District Court, two notices of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tools; District Court, notice of filing, Office of Desegregation Management report, ''2004-05 Enrollment and Racial Composition of the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD)''; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool; District Court, plaintiff's notice of filing quarterly update to Office of Desegregation Management and Joshua; District Court, notice of filing, Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) project management tool    This transcript was create using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) and may contain some errors.    Arkansas DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 4 ST.-\\TE C.-\\P!TOL MALL  Lfrrt.E ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 -1071  (S01) 682--1475  http://arkedu.sta te.ar.us Dr. Kenneth James, Director of Education September 30, 2004 Mr. M. Samuel Jones, III Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 200 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Mr. Christopher Heller R ~ C ~ Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark I;; ~ f V f D 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 G~T l - 2004 Mr. Stephen W. Jones DESE ,. OFFICE.OF Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones GREuAf/ONi, 10NITDRJNG 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. U.S. District Court No. 4:82-CV-866 Dear Gentlemen: Per ail agreement with the Attorney General's Office, I am filing the Arkansas Department of Education's Project Management Tool for the month of September 2004 in the above-referenced case. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, General Counsel Arkansas Department of Education SS:law cc: Mark Hagemeier BOARD OF EDUCATION: Chair - JoNell Caldwell, Little Rock  Vice Chair - Jeanna Westmoreland, Arkadelphia Members: Sherry Burrow, Jonesboro  Shelby Hillman, Carlisle  Calvin King, Marianna  Randy Lawson, Bentonville MaryJane Rebick, Little Rock  Diane Tatum, Pine Bluff  Naccaman Williams, Johnson An Equal Opportunity Employer UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of the ADE's Project Management Tool for September 2004. Respectfully Submitted, cott Smit , Bar# 92251 General Counsel, Arkansas Department of Education #4 Capitol Mall, Room 404-A Little Rock, AR 72201 501-682-4227 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Scott Smith, certify that on September 30, 2004, I caused the foregoing document to be served by depositing a copy in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to each of the following: Mr. M. Samuel Jones, Ill Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 200 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 - -- --- - - - - ------------~ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL RECEiVED o:T 1 - 2004 OFFICE Of DESEGREGATION ;,iONITORING In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. - IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Based on the information available at AuQust,31, 2004, the ADE calculated the Equalization Funding for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS (Continued) B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. (Continued) 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Based-ordfie-information available afAugust 31,' 2004, the ADE calculated for -FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. C. Process and distribute State MFPA. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 On AuQust 31, 2004, distributions of State Equalization Funding for FY 04/05 were as follows: LRSD - $5,916,608 NLRSD - $3,027,651 PCSSD - $5,432,019 The allotments of State Equalization FundinQ calculated for FY 04/05 at August 31, 2004, subject to periodic adjustments, were as follows: LRSD -$59,166,086 NLRSD - $30,276,517 PCSSD - $54,320,195 D. Determine the number of Magnet students residing in each District and attending a Magnet School. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of September 30, 2004 Based on the information available, the ADE calculated at August 31, 2004 for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. E. Desegregation Staff Attorney reports the Magnet Operational Charge to the Fiscal Services Office. 1. Projected Ending Date Ongoing, as ordered by the Court. 2 Arkansas DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 4 STATE CAPITOL MALL  UITLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201 -1071  (501) 682-4475  http:/ / arkedu.state.ar.us Dr. Kenneth James, Director of Education September 27, 2004 Mr. M. Samuel Jones, III Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 200 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 0 c-, -l t\\:) Oo ~ c:::\u0026gt; c:::\u0026gt; -- RE: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. US. District Court No. 4:82-CV-866 Dear Gentlemen: Per an agreement with the Attorney General's Office, I am filing the Arkansas /JC.JDepartment of Education's Project Management Tool for the month of fuwternber 2004 in the above-referenced case. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Sir::~, ~fL -a~~' General Counsel Arkansas Department of Education SS:law cc: Mark Hagemeier :c m -m0 m\u0026lt; C S E BOARD OF EDUCATION: Chair - JoNell Caldwell, Little Rock  Vice Chair - Jeanna Westmoreland, Arkadelphia Members: Sherry Burrow, Jonesboro  Shelby Hillman, Carlisle  Calvin King, Marianna  Randy Lawson, Bentonville MaryJane Rebick, Little Rock  Diane Tatum, Pine Bluff  Naccaman Williams, Johnson An Equal Opportunity Employer UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of the ADE's Project Management Tool for October 2004. Respectfully Submitted, General Counsel, Arkansas Department of Education #4 Capitol Mall, Room 404-A Little Rock, AR 72201 501-682-4227 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Scott Smith, certify that on October '2'1'~004, I caused the foregoing document to be served by depositing a copy in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to each of the following: Mr. M. Samuel Jones, III Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 200 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1 723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS AD~SPROJECTMANAGEMENTTOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1 . Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31, 2004 Based on the information available at September 30, 2004, the ADE calculated the Equalization Funding for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of October 31 , 2004 Based on the information available at September 30, 2004, the ADE calculated the Equalization Funding for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. II 11. Ii II 11 II II II II ll II II I I I I  2004-05 ENROLLMENT AND RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Horace R Smith Monitor November 23, 2004 Office of Desegregation Monitoring United States District Court Little Rock, Arkansas NOV 2 3 2004 ~;:MES W. McCORMACK, CLERK Polly Ramer Office Manager Arkansas DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 4 STATE CAPITOL MALL  UITLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72201-1071  (501) 682-4475  http://arkedu.state.ar.us Dr. Kenneth James, Director of Education November 30, 2004 Mr.M. SrunuelJones, III Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 200 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 RECEIVED DEC 1 - 2004 DN, OFFICE OF t,.EGREGATIGN friON/TORING RE: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. U.S. District Court No. 4:82-CV-866 Dear Gentlemen: Per an agreement with the Attorney General's Office, I run filing the Arkansas Department of Education's Project Management Tool for the month of November 2004 in the above-referenced case. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, ~~ General Counsel Arkansas Department of Education SS:law cc: Mark Hagemeier .E BOARD OF EDUCATION: Chair - JoNell Caldwell, Little Rock  Vice Chair - Jeanna Westmoreland, Arkadelphia Members: Sherry Burrow, Jonesboro  Shelby Hillman, Carlisle  Calvin King, Marianna  Randy Lawson, Bentonville MaryJane Rebick, Little Rock  Diane Tatum, Pine Bluff  Naccaman Williams, Johnson An Equal Opportunity Employer UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS . WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. No. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of the ADE's Project Management Tool for November 2004. Respectfully Submitted, General Counsel, Arkansas Department of Education #4 Capitol Mall, Room 404-A Little Rock, AR 72201 501-682-4227 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Scott Smith, certify that on November 30, 2004, I caused the foregoing document to be served by depositing a copy in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to each of the following: Mr. M. SamuelJones,m Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 200 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0. Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 INTHE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. e, IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of November 30, 2004 Based on the information available at October 31, 2004, the ADE calculated the State Foundation Funding for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1 . Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT V. LR-C-82-866 PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL KATHERINE KNIGHT, ET AL RECF,\"\"\" ~~ ,eo Ci 'ti' DEC 2 - 2004 OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION 1,JONITORING PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF FILING OUARTERL Y UPDATE TO OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION MONITORING AND JOSHUA PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS INTER VEN ORS INTER VEN ORS Plaintiff Little Rock School District (\"LRSD\") for its Notice of Filing Quarterly Update to Office of Desegregation Monitoring and Joshua dated December 1, 2004 states: 1. The attached document is the first quarterly written update by the Little Rock School District and its Planning, Research, and Evaluation Department. It has been provided to the Joshua Intervenors and the Office ofDesegregation Monitoring in accordance with the District Court's 2004 Compliance Remedy (Memorandum Opinion of June 30, 2004). 2. LRSD is filing this Quarterly Update so that the Court may be aware of the compliance work done by LRSD to comply with the Court's Memorandum Opinion of June 30, 2004. WHEREFORE, the LRSD submits its Quarterly Update to Office of Desegregation Monitoring and Joshua as required by the Court. Respectfully Submitted, LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT FRIDAY, ELDREDGE \u0026amp; CLARK Christopher Heller (#81083) 2000 Regions Center 400 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 (501) 376-2011 I / ~ 6 -~ B~ - 1/( ChristopherHelr CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served on the following people by depositing a copy of same in the United States mail on the 1st day of December, 2004: Mr. John W. Walker JOHNW. WALKER, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Sam Jones Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 2200 Nations Bank Bldg. 200 West Capitol Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Steve Jones JACK, LYON \u0026amp; JONES, P.A. 425 W. Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201-3472 Judge J. Thomas Ray U. S. District Courthouse 600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 149 Little Rock, AR 7220 I 2 Desegregation Monitor 1 Union National Plaza 124 W. Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Tim Gauger Mr. Mark A. Hagemeier Office of the Attorney General 323 Center Street 200 Tower Building Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Clayton Blackstock Mr. Mark Burnett 1010 W. Third Street Little Rock, AR 72201 c--- ~ -,-=;;;.-:z~:;,c:;Christopherl er Attachment furnished November 30, 2004 separately December 27, 2004 Mr. M. Samuel Jones, III Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 200 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark REC-f~~v7ED 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 OEC ?. ~ 2004 Mr. John W. Walker Mr. Stephen W. Jones OFFICE OF DESEGREGATION;1 iONITORING I I John Walker, P.A. 1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes, Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0 . Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: Little Rock School District v. Pulaski County Special School District, et al. US. District Court No. 4:82-CV-866 WRW Dear Gentlemen: Per an agreement with the Attorney General's Office, I am filing the Arkansas Department of Education's Project Management Tool for the month of December 2004 in the above-referenced case. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. General Counsel Arkansas Department of Education SS:law cc: Mark Hagemeier ATE BOARD OF EDUCATION: Chair - JoNell Caldwell, Uttle Rock  Vice Chair - Jeanna Westmoreland, Arkadelphia Memben: Sherry Burrow, Jonesboro  Shelby Hillman, Carlille  Calvin Kina, Marianna  Randy I.anon, Beaton.me MaryJane Rebick, Uttle Rock  Diane Tatum, Pine Bluff  Naccaman Williams, Johmon A Equl Opportalty Employer UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF V. No. LR-C-82-866 WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF FILING In accordance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education hereby gives notice of the filing of the ADE's Project Management Tool for December 2004. Respectfully Submitted, Scott Sm1 , ar # 2 51 General Counsel, Arkansas Department of Education #4 Capitol Mall, Room 404-A Little Rock, AR 72201 501-682-4227 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Scott Smith, certify that on December 27, 2004, I caused the foregoing document to be served by depositing a copy in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to each of the following: Mr. M. Samuel Jones, III Wright, Lindsey \u0026amp; Jennings 200 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. John W. Walker John Walker, P.A. .1723 Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Mr. Mark Burnette Mitchell, Blackstock, Barnes Wagoner, Ivers \u0026amp; Sneddon P. 0 . Box 1510 Little Rock, AR 72203-1510 Mr. Christopher Heller Friday, Eldredge \u0026amp; Clark 400 West Capitol, Suite 2000 Little Rock, AR 72201-3493 Mr. Stephen W. Jones Jack, Lyon \u0026amp; Jones 425 West Capitol, Suite 3400 Little Rock, AR 72201 Office of Desegregation Monitoring One Union National Plaza 124 West Capitol, Suite 1895 Little Rock, AR 72201 ~m1th . IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL PLAINTIFFS V. NO. LR-C-82-866 WRW PULASKI COUNTY SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL DEFENDANTS MRS. LORENE JOSHUA, ET AL INTERVENORS KATHERINE W. KNIGHT, ET AL INTERVENORS ADE'S PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOL In compliance with the Court's Order of December 10, 1993, the Arkansas Department of Education (ADE) submits the following Project Management Tool to the parties and the Court. This document describes the progress the ADE has made since March 15, 1994, in complying with provisions of the Implementation Plan and itemizes the ADE's progress against timelines presented in the Plan. - IMPLEMENTATION PHASE ACTIVITY I. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS A. Use the previous year's three quarter average daily membership to calculate MFPA (State Equalization) for the current school year. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June. 2. Actual as of December 31, 2004 Based on the information available at November 30, 2004, the ADE calculated the State Foundation Funding for FY 04/05, subject to periodic adjustments. B. Include all Magnet students in the resident District's average daily membership for calculation. 1. Projected Ending Date Last day of each month, August - June.    This project was supported in part by a Digitizing Hidden Special Collections and Archives project grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and Council on Library and Information Resources.\u003c/dcterms_description\u003e\n   \n\n\u003c/dcterms_description\u003e   \n\n  \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n  \n\n \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n  \n\n  \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n\n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n   \n\n\u003c/item\u003e\n\u003c/items\u003e"}],"pages":{"current_page":313,"next_page":314,"prev_page":312,"total_pages":6766,"limit_value":12,"offset_value":3744,"total_count":81191,"first_page?":false,"last_page?":false},"facets":[{"name":"educator_resource_mediums_sms","items":[{"value":"lesson plans","hits":319},{"value":"teaching guides","hits":53},{"value":"timelines (chronologies)","hits":43},{"value":"online exhibitions","hits":38},{"value":"bibliographies","hits":15},{"value":"study guides","hits":11},{"value":"annotated bibliographies","hits":9},{"value":"learning modules","hits":6},{"value":"worksheets","hits":6},{"value":"slide shows","hits":4},{"value":"quizzes","hits":1}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"type_facet","items":[{"value":"Text","hits":40200},{"value":"StillImage","hits":35114},{"value":"MovingImage","hits":4552},{"value":"Sound","hits":3248},{"value":"Collection","hits":41},{"value":"InteractiveResource","hits":25}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":16,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"creator_facet","items":[{"value":"Peppler, Jim","hits":4965},{"value":"Phay, John E.","hits":4712},{"value":"University of Mississippi. Bureau of Educational Research","hits":4707},{"value":"Baldowski, Clifford H., 1917-1999","hits":2599},{"value":"Mississippi State Sovereignty Commission","hits":2255},{"value":"Thurmond, Strom, 1902-2003","hits":2077},{"value":"WSB-TV (Television station : Atlanta, Ga.)","hits":1475},{"value":"Newman, I. DeQuincey (Isaiah DeQuincey), 1911-1985","hits":1003},{"value":"The State Media Company (Columbia, S.C.)","hits":926},{"value":"Atlanta Journal-Constitution","hits":844},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":778}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_facet","items":[{"value":"African Americans--Civil rights","hits":9441},{"value":"Civil rights","hits":8347},{"value":"African Americans","hits":5895},{"value":"Mississippi--Race relations","hits":5750},{"value":"Race relations","hits":5607},{"value":"Education, Secondary","hits":5083},{"value":"Education, Elementary","hits":4729},{"value":"Segregation in education--Mississippi","hits":4727},{"value":"Education--Pictorial works","hits":4707},{"value":"Civil rights demonstrations","hits":4436},{"value":"Civil rights workers","hits":3530}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"subject_personal_facet","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966--Correspondence","hits":1888},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1809},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1709},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1312},{"value":"Baker, Augusta, 1911-1998","hits":1282},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1071},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":858},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":814},{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":719},{"value":"Mizell, M. Hayes","hits":674},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":626}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"name_authoritative_sms","items":[{"value":"Smith, Lillian (Lillian Eugenia), 1897-1966","hits":2598},{"value":"King, Martin Luther, Jr., 1929-1968","hits":1909},{"value":"Meredith, James, 1933-","hits":1704},{"value":"Herrera, John J.","hits":1331},{"value":"Parks, Rosa, 1913-2005","hits":1070},{"value":"Jordan, Barbara, 1936-1996","hits":856},{"value":"Young, Andrew, 1932-","hits":806},{"value":"Silver, James W. (James Wesley), 1907-1988","hits":625},{"value":"Connor, Eugene, 1897-1973","hits":605},{"value":"Snelling, Paula","hits":580},{"value":"Williams, Hosea, 1926-2000","hits":431}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"event_title_sms","items":[{"value":"Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Nobel Prize","hits":1763},{"value":"Ole Miss Integration","hits":1670},{"value":"Housing Act of 1961","hits":965},{"value":"Little Rock Central High School Integration","hits":704},{"value":"Memphis Sanitation Workers Strike","hits":366},{"value":"Selma-Montgomery March","hits":337},{"value":"Freedom Summer","hits":306},{"value":"Freedom Rides","hits":214},{"value":"Poor People's Campaign","hits":180},{"value":"University of Georgia Integration","hits":173},{"value":"University of Alabama Integration","hits":140}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"location_facet","items":[{"value":"United States, 39.76, -98.5","hits":17820},{"value":"United States, Georgia, Fulton County, Atlanta, 33.749, -84.38798","hits":5428},{"value":"United States, Alabama, Montgomery County, Montgomery, 32.36681, -86.29997","hits":5151},{"value":"United States, Georgia, 32.75042, -83.50018","hits":4862},{"value":"United States, South Carolina, 34.00043, -81.00009","hits":4610},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, 34.75037, -92.50044","hits":4177},{"value":"United States, Alabama, 32.75041, -86.75026","hits":3943},{"value":"United States, Mississippi, 32.75041, -89.75036","hits":2910},{"value":"United States, Tennessee, Shelby County, Memphis, 35.14953, -90.04898","hits":2579},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, 34.76993, -92.3118","hits":2430},{"value":"United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County, Little Rock, 34.74648, -92.28959","hits":2387}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"us_states_facet","items":[{"value":"Georgia","hits":12843},{"value":"Alabama","hits":11307},{"value":"Mississippi","hits":10219},{"value":"South Carolina","hits":8503},{"value":"Arkansas","hits":4583},{"value":"Texas","hits":4399},{"value":"Tennessee","hits":3770},{"value":"Florida","hits":2601},{"value":"Ohio","hits":2391},{"value":"North Carolina","hits":1893},{"value":"New York","hits":1667}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"year_facet","items":[{"value":"1966","hits":10514},{"value":"1963","hits":10193},{"value":"1965","hits":10119},{"value":"1956","hits":9832},{"value":"1955","hits":9611},{"value":"1964","hits":9268},{"value":"1968","hits":9243},{"value":"1962","hits":9152},{"value":"1967","hits":8771},{"value":"1957","hits":8460},{"value":"1958","hits":8242},{"value":"1961","hits":8241},{"value":"1959","hits":8046},{"value":"1960","hits":7940},{"value":"1954","hits":7239},{"value":"1969","hits":7235},{"value":"1950","hits":7117},{"value":"1953","hits":6968},{"value":"1970","hits":6743},{"value":"1971","hits":6337},{"value":"1977","hits":6280},{"value":"1952","hits":6161},{"value":"1972","hits":6144},{"value":"1951","hits":6045},{"value":"1975","hits":5806},{"value":"1976","hits":5771},{"value":"1974","hits":5729},{"value":"1973","hits":5591},{"value":"1979","hits":5329},{"value":"1978","hits":5318},{"value":"1980","hits":5279},{"value":"1995","hits":4829},{"value":"1981","hits":4724},{"value":"1994","hits":4654},{"value":"1948","hits":4596},{"value":"1949","hits":4571},{"value":"1996","hits":4486},{"value":"1982","hits":4330},{"value":"1947","hits":4316},{"value":"1985","hits":4226},{"value":"1998","hits":4225},{"value":"1997","hits":4202},{"value":"1983","hits":4174},{"value":"1984","hits":4065},{"value":"1946","hits":4046},{"value":"1999","hits":4018},{"value":"1945","hits":4017},{"value":"1990","hits":3937},{"value":"1986","hits":3919},{"value":"1943","hits":3899},{"value":"1944","hits":3895},{"value":"1942","hits":3867},{"value":"2000","hits":3808},{"value":"2001","hits":3790},{"value":"1940","hits":3764},{"value":"1941","hits":3757},{"value":"1987","hits":3657},{"value":"2002","hits":3538},{"value":"1991","hits":3507},{"value":"1936","hits":3506},{"value":"1939","hits":3500},{"value":"1938","hits":3465},{"value":"1937","hits":3449},{"value":"1992","hits":3444},{"value":"1993","hits":3422},{"value":"2003","hits":3403},{"value":"1930","hits":3377},{"value":"1989","hits":3355},{"value":"1935","hits":3306},{"value":"1933","hits":3270},{"value":"1934","hits":3270},{"value":"1988","hits":3269},{"value":"1932","hits":3254},{"value":"1931","hits":3239},{"value":"2005","hits":3057},{"value":"2004","hits":2909},{"value":"1929","hits":2789},{"value":"2006","hits":2774},{"value":"1928","hits":2271},{"value":"1921","hits":2123},{"value":"1925","hits":2039},{"value":"1927","hits":2025},{"value":"1924","hits":2011},{"value":"1926","hits":2009},{"value":"1920","hits":1975},{"value":"1923","hits":1954},{"value":"1922","hits":1928},{"value":"2016","hits":1925},{"value":"2007","hits":1629},{"value":"2008","hits":1578},{"value":"2011","hits":1575},{"value":"2019","hits":1537},{"value":"1919","hits":1532},{"value":"2009","hits":1532},{"value":"1918","hits":1530},{"value":"2015","hits":1527},{"value":"2013","hits":1518},{"value":"2010","hits":1515},{"value":"2014","hits":1481},{"value":"2012","hits":1467}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null},"min":"0193","max":"2035","count":500952,"missing":56},{"name":"medium_facet","items":[{"value":"photographs","hits":10708},{"value":"correspondence","hits":9437},{"value":"black-and-white photographs","hits":7678},{"value":"negatives (photographs)","hits":7513},{"value":"documents (object genre)","hits":4462},{"value":"letters (correspondence)","hits":3623},{"value":"oral histories (literary works)","hits":3607},{"value":"black-and-white negatives","hits":2740},{"value":"editorial cartoons","hits":2620},{"value":"newspapers","hits":1955},{"value":"manuscripts (documents)","hits":1692}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"rights_facet","items":[{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/","hits":41178},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-EDU/1.0/","hits":17554},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/UND/1.0/","hits":8828},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/","hits":6864},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/","hits":2186},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-NC/1.0/","hits":1778},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-CR/1.0/","hits":1115},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","hits":197},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/","hits":60},{"value":"http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC-RUU/1.0/","hits":51},{"value":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","hits":27}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"collection_titles_sms","items":[{"value":"Jim Peppler Southern Courier Photograph Collection","hits":4956},{"value":"John E. Phay Collection ","hits":4706},{"value":"John J. Herrera Papers","hits":3288},{"value":"Baldy Editorial Cartoons, 1946-1982, 1997: Clifford H. Baldowski Editorial Cartoons at the Richard B. Russell Library.","hits":2607},{"value":"Sovereignty Commission Online","hits":2335},{"value":"Strom Thurmond Collection, Mss 100","hits":2068},{"value":"Alabama Media Group Collection","hits":2067},{"value":"Black Trailblazers, Leaders, Activists, and Intellectuals in Cleveland","hits":2033},{"value":"Rosa Parks Papers","hits":1948},{"value":"Isaiah DeQuincey Newman, (1911-1985), Papers, 1929-2003","hits":1904},{"value":"Lillian Eugenia Smith Papers (circa 1920-1980)","hits":1887}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"provenance_facet","items":[{"value":"John Davis Williams Library. Department of Archives and Special Collections","hits":8885},{"value":"Alabama. Department of Archives and History","hits":8146},{"value":"Atlanta University Center Robert W. Woodruff Library","hits":4102},{"value":"South Caroliniana Library","hits":4024},{"value":"University of North Texas. Libraries","hits":3854},{"value":"Hargrett Library","hits":3292},{"value":"University of South Carolina. Libraries","hits":3212},{"value":"Richard B. Russell Library for Political Research and Studies","hits":2874},{"value":"Mississippi. Department of Archives and History","hits":2825},{"value":"Butler Center for Arkansas Studies","hits":2633},{"value":"Rhodes College","hits":2264}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":11,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"class_name","items":[{"value":"Item","hits":80736},{"value":"Collection","hits":455}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}},{"name":"educator_resource_b","items":[{"value":"false","hits":80994},{"value":"true","hits":197}],"options":{"sort":"count","limit":100,"offset":0,"prefix":null}}]}}